The URL can be used to link to this page

2019-09-17 Council PKT - Regular CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Council Chambers - City Hall September 17, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation: Mayor's Day of Concern — September 21 ...page 4 b. Proclamation: National Recovery Month — September 2019 ...page 5 c. Mayor's Emerging Issues and Report • Severe Weather Shelter Update—Sarah Bridgeford • Recent Events: Federal Way Chamber Quarterly City Update (9/10); DaVita Groundbreaking (9/10) • Upcoming Events: Federal Way Boys &Girls Club Breakfast on Sept 17; Mayors Day of Concern Food Drive at area grocery stores on September 21; Farmers Markets—Taste of Federal Way on September 28 d. Council Committee Reports • Finance, Economic Development Regional Affairs Committee (FEDRAC) • Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) • Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) • Parks/Recreation/Human Services/Public Safety Committee (PRHSPS) • Regional Committees Report(PIC) • Deputy Mayor Report 4. CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE A PINK SLIP AND TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. When recognized by the Mayor,come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Please limit your comments to three minutes. The Mayor may interrupt comments that exceed three minutes, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed in their entirety by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval;all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items maybe removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. Minutes: September 3, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes ...page 6 b. Greenway Plan 85% Design Report and Authorization to Bid ...page 13 The City Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. City Council Meetings are wheelchair accessible; and assisted listening devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk. Regular Meetings are recorded and televised live on Government Access Channel 21.To view Council Meetings online please visit www.cityoffederalway.com. c. Resolution: King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ...page 16 d. Award Contract for Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control — Traffic Control Center ... page 439 e. Authorization to Increase Project Budget for Surface Water Management (SWM) Comp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study ...page 441 f. Surface Water Management (SWM) 2020-2027 CIP Update ...page 443 g. Wild Waves Holdings Lease Agreement ...page 492 h. Federal Way Link Extension Task Order#2 ...page 494 i. S. Dash Point SW— 85% request to bid ...page 512 j. Portable Toilet Services Contract Amendment ...page 515 k. University of Washington Extra Duty Police Services Agreement ...page 519 I. Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Auburn for Leasing Space for the Puget Sound Auto Theft Task Force ...page 528 m. Ballistic Vest Partnership (BVP) Grant ...page 532 n. King County Registered Sex Offender Cost Reimbursement Agreement ...page 535 o. Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program for FY 2017 ...page 547 6. COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Performing Arts & Event Center (PAEC) Interim Financing ...page 597 b. Council Discussion regarding the proposed King County Regional Homelessness Authority (potential action) ...page 600 7. ORDINANCES First Reading a. Council Bill #764 Relating to Snow and Ice ...page 603 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO DECLARING WINTER SNOW AND ICE EMERGENCIES AS SNOW ALERTS, REMOVAL OF SNOW AND ICE FROM SIDEWALKS, REMOVAL OF VEHICLES FROM CITY PRIMARY SNOW ROUTES DURING DECLARED SNOW ALERTS,AND PROHIBITING THE ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLES ON CITY STREET DURING THE SAME; AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS TO CHAPTER 4.40 AND 8.60 FWRC. • Staff Report: Desiree Winkler, Deputy Public Works Director • Citizen Comment— 3 minutes • Council Questions b. Council Bill #765 Renewal of North Lake Management District #2 ...page 611 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO THE RENEWAL OF THE NORTH LAKE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE DISTRICT. • Staff Report: Leah Myhre, SWM Water Quality Coordinator • Citizen Comment— 3 minutes The City Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. City Council Meetings are wheelchair accessible; and assisted listening devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk. Regular Meetings are recorded and televised live on Government Access Channel 21.To view Council Meetings online please visit www.cityoffederalway.com. • Council Questions c. Council Bill #766 Surface Water Management (SWM) 2021 Rate Structure Change ...page 620 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CHANGING THE POLICY AND RATE STRUCTURE FOR THE STORM AND SURFACE WATER UTILITY; AMENDING FWRC 11.40.030, 11.40.100, 11.45.010, 11.45.020, 11.45.030,AND 11.45.070; REPEALING FWRC 11.40.050, 11.40.080,AND 11.40.090; AND ADDING A NEW SECTION TO CHAPTER 11.40 FWRC. (AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 14-775, 07-571, 06-544, 02-433, 96-277, 91-117, AND 90-32) • Staff Report: Theresa Thurlow, Surface Water Manager • Citizen Comment— 3 minutes • Council Questions 8. COUNCIL REPORTS 9. ADJOURNMENT The City Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. City Council Meetings are wheelchair accessible; and assisted listening devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk. Regular Meetings are recorded and televised live on Government Access Channel 21.To view Council Meetings online please visit www.cityoffederalway.com. CITY OF Federal Way PROCLAMATION "Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry" September 21, 2019 WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way recognizes adequate nutrition as a basic goal for each citizen; and WHEREAS, it is our fundamental belief that no parent should have to send a child to school hungry, no baby should be without the comfort of the feedings needed for mental and physical growth, no elderly person's health should be jeopardized by lack of appropriate foods; and WHEREAS, the Multi-Service Center food bank, emergency and hot meal programs, local churches, social service agencies, and hundreds of volunteers are striving each day to stem the rising tide of hunger, but still need more help; and WHEREAS, many Federal Way residents have the ability to impact hunger in their community through donations of food; and WHEREAS, we will strive to raise awareness and encourage our citizens to donate food to the hungry as winter approaches and their resources must be stretched to cover increasing fuel, electricity and rental costs—leaving even less money for monthly food purchases; and WHEREAS, the Emergency Feeding Program of Seattle & King County coordinates an annual food drive to help support the efforts of their .program and the area's food banks in fighting hunger which will be held at grocery stores throughout King County on Saturday, September 21, 2019. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Mayor and City Council of the City of Federal Way, do hereby proclaim September 21, 2019 as the "Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry' in the City of Federal Way, and strongly urge all citizens to join the Emergency Feeding Program and the Multi-Service Center to nourish those who are hungry. SIGNED this 17th day of September, 2019. FEDERAL WAYMAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Jim Ferrell,Mayor SuspqHda,Deputy Mayor d' ssefa-Da on, ouncilmember J s ohnson,Councilmember Hang V. n C ncilmember rk Kopffr , ouncilmem Martin Moore,tourcilmember Dini Duclos,Councilmember m l CITY OF . .... Federal Way PROCLAMATION "National Recovery Month" WHEREAS,behavioral health is an essential part of one's overall wellness; and WHEREAS, prevention of mental and substance use disorders is effective and people recover in our area and around the nation; and WHEREAS, preventing and overcoming mental and substance use disorders is essential to achieving healthy lifestyles, both physically and emotionally; and WHEREAS, we must encourage relatives and friends of individuals with mental and/or substance use disorders to implement preventive measures, recognize the signs of a problem and guide those in need to appropriate treatment and recovery support services; and WHEREAS, an estimated 400,000 people in King County are affected by these conditions; and WHEREAS, to help more people achieve and sustain long-term recovery, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, and the City of Federal Way invite all residents to participate in `National Recovery Month;" and NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Mayor and City Council of the City of Federal Way do hereby proclaim September 2019 as `National Recovery Month" and encourage all citizens to observe this month with appropriate programs, activities and ceremonies to support this year's Recover Month theme, "Join the Voices for Recovery:Together We Are Stronger". SIGNED this 17th day of September, 2019 FEDERAL WAYMAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL r Ferrell,Mayor 5u; Hon , Deputy Mayor L a Assefa- a cilmember �1` a 0. 61inson.Councilmember Hoanq V. an,Councilmember KoppfrgImembep/ Martin N400re,Councilmember Dini Duclos,Councilmember COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17, 2019 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the draft minutes for the September 3, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting? COMMITTEE: N/A MEETING DATE: N/A CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Stephanie Courtney, City Clerk DEPT: Mayor's Office Attachments: Draft minutes for the September 3, 2019 Regular Meeting Options Considered: 1. Approve the minutes as presented. 2. Amend the minutes as necessary. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION:N/A MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A N/A CITY CLERK APPROVAL: Committee Council ti sial,'i)ate Initial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A N/A N/A N/A Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "!move ap1)1-01)a1 Of the minutes as presented. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETF_D BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances on/.i) ORDINANCE# REVISED— 12/2016 RESOLUTION# CITY OF Federal Way CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES ON�� Council Chambers - City Hall September 3, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Ferrell called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. City officials in attendance: Mayor Jim Ferrell, Deputy Mayor Susan Honda, Councilmember Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Councilmember Jesse Johnson, Councilmember Hoang Tran, Councilmember Mark Koppang, Councilmember Martin Moore, and Councilmember Dini Duclos. City staff in attendance: City Attorney Ryan Call and City Clerk Stephanie Courtney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Ferrell led the flag salute. 3. PRESENTATIONS a. Police Department Swearing In Ceremony Police Chief Andy Hwang introduced Officer Alexander Clark who was recently hired as a lateral officer; the Chief also provided his law enforcement background. Mayor Ferrell administered the Oath of Office and congratulated Officer Clark. b. Proclamation: Constitution Week September 17-23 Deputy Mayor Honda read and presented the proclamation to Sally Jarvis who represents the Daughters of the American Revolution. Ms. Jarvis spoke regarding the importance of women in history and of understanding the intent and significance of the Constitution. She recognizes how important democracy is and honors those individuals who began a nation through this document. c. Proclamation: National Recovery Month Mayor Ferrell noted due to unforeseen circumstances,this proclamation will be presented at the next regular meeting. d. Certificate of Recognition Parks Director John Hutton introduced Federal Way Soccer Association President Josh Cheatham and Federal Way Soccer Association Fields Director George Pfeiffer. Mr. Hutton, along with Councilmember Johnson, presented Mr. Cheatham and Mr. Pfeiffer Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page I of 6 September 3, 2019 with a certificate of recognition for their generous donation of$50,000 towards the field turf replacement at Saghalie Field,which broke ground today. Mr. Cheatham thanked Mr. Hutton and Councilmember Johnson for the recognition and the longtime partnership with city staff and leadership from the elected officials over the years. He extended kudos to the Parks Department for the number of hours they put in to make that facility great and the Federal Way Soccer Association is proud to help maintain it. e. Certificates of Appointment: Senior Advisory Commission Deputy Mayor Honda read the certificates of appointment as Councilmembers assisted with distribution of certificates and congratulated the new Commissioners. Deputy Mayor Honda noted their first meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 5 at City Hall. The Council is very excited to see this committee begin working. f. Certificates of Appointment: Diversity Commission Councilmember Johnson read and presented certificates of appointment to newly appointed commissioners. g. Mayor's Emerging Issues and Report Back-to-School Safety Briefing: Police Chief Hwang briefed Council and the community on important safety reminders with school beginning this week. He reminded drivers to take special care when approaching school zones and student bus stops. He also noted distracted driving and younger inexperienced drivers continue to be of concern. He reviewed an illustration outlining which roadway conditions allow for legal passing of a stopped school bus. Mayor Ferrell reported on the recent Federal Way Public Schools New Teacher Breakfast he attended on August 12. He noted many upcoming events in the community including: the Groundbreaking Ceremony for the DaVita building on September 9;the Quarterly City Update at the Chamber on September 10; the 9-11 Ceremony at South King Fire & Rescue Station 64 on September 11; Experience the Difference Food and Beverage Showcase at the Performing Arts & Event Center on Sept 12; Boys and Girls Club Fundraiser Breakfast on September 17; the Korean Community Quarterly City Update Meeting at City Hall on September 17; and he reminded everyone to support the Mayor's Day of Concern food drive at area grocery stores on Saturday, September 21. h. Council Committee Reports Finance, Economic Development Regional Affairs Committee(FEDRAC)—Chair Duclos had no report, as the August meeting was canceled. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) — Chair Moore announced the next meeting would be on September 11 at 10:00 a.m. in the Hylebos Conference Room. They will be discussing a city welcome sign on 3481h, the City Center Access Plan, and many big events coming to Federal Way in the next few months. Land Use/Transportation Committee(LUTC)—Chair Koppang reported the next meeting would be Monday, September 9 at 5:00 p.m. He will be attending remotely and there is a very long agenda including discussions on the FW Link Extension and an airport update from Bill Vadino. Parks/Recreation/Human Services/Public Safety Committee(PRHSPS)—Chair Johnson reported the next meeting is Tuesday, September 10 at 5:00 p.m. in the Hylebos Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 2 of 6 September 3, 2019 Conference Room. The agenda includes police contracts and discussions regarding a new facility locating in Federal Way, and how the city can partner with them and serve the Latino Community.The Committee will also discuss the prioritization of the Homelessness Task Force recommendations, After School Programs, and severe weather shelter for those without permanent housing. Regional Committees Report (PIC) Councilmember Assefa-Dawson reported the PIC Committee meeting in August was canceled; the next meeting is September 11. She has already briefed the Council on and has requested input on the issues they will be discussing and voting on. Deputy Mayor reported August was a quiet month for Council and the remainder of the year will be busy. She encouraged individuals to apply for open volunteer commissions including the Youth Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission,and the Civil Service Commission. The next review of applications is the end of September. 4. CITIZEN COMMENT Dana Hollaway spoke regarding her ongoing concern with the city revenues and expenditures and the effect it has on essential city services. She expressed concern with the multi-family dwelling limited property tax exemption which may promote more units to be constructed without paying into property taxes which fund services such as police, fire, schools, and libraries. Eldean Montgomery cautioned citizens about the Pacific Highway Post Office and noted her mail was stolen from the box and has learned a lesson with sending bills through this post office. 5. CONSENT AGENDA a. Minutes: August 13, 2019 Special and Regular Meeting Minutes DEPUTY MAYOR HONDA MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA; SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER ASSEFA-DAWSON. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes 6. COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Interlocal agreements approving membership in Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) City Attorney Ryan Call briefed Council on the current self-insured coverage. Mr. Call noted at the time, the principle factor in becoming self-insured was to save money; however through analysis from 2013 it shows on average, the city did not save money. He also highlighted the proposed coverage, cost savings and benefits of transitioning coverage to the industry leader with WCIA. The city was previously covered by WCIA before withdrawing in January of 2013. He stated the request tonight is to authorize the city tojoin Washington Cities Insurance Authority(WCIA)and authorize the Mayorto sign the Interlocal to acquire no-deductible coverage for general liability. Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 3 of 6 September 3, 2019 WCIA Deputy Director Rob Roscoe, Deputy Director WCIA also provided a brief presentation to the Council. He noted WCIA is member—driven public organization with 155 members. Participating public entities are co-owners of the pool, sharing the core value of long-term risk management to contain and stabilize long-term costs while increasing safety. Advantages of WCIA membership include services to assist members in avoiding and reducing losses through risk management and claim handling; and stability and transparency in rates. Mr. Roscoe reviewed the coverage including liability; property and auto; equipment breakdown, crime and Fidelity, and information security/cyber liability. Experienced in- house staff will handle claims and risk management. Councilmembers thanked Mr. Call and Mr. Roscoe and asked various clarifying questions regarding earthquake coverage, and incidents which would increase costs. COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO JOIN WASHINGTON CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY AND TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO TAKE THOSE STEPS NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE NO-DEDUCTIBLE COVERAGE FOR GENERAL LIABILITY; COUNCILMEMBER KOPPANG SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes b. Federal Way Lieutenants' Association Bargaining Agreement City Attorney Ryan Call briefed council on the final ratified agreementwith the Lieutenants' Association. Mr. Call noted the current agreement expired December 31, 2018 this agreement would cover January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Key points of bargaining agreement include: • Wages — consistent with Guild wage increases • HRA VEBA— city will set up an account for mandatory contribution by union members, no city match • Clarified bereavement leave consistent with Guild contract • Expanded list of items eligible for reimbursement and streamlined method of processing claims • Paid jury duty increased to be consistent with other employees DEPUTY MAYOR HONDA MOVED APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED 2019-2020 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WITH THE FEDERAL WAY LIEUTENANTS ASSOCIATION; COUNCILMEMBER KOPPANG SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 4 of 6 September 3, 2019 c. Civil Action to Collect Money from Rental Agreements Deputy Mayor Honda noted she will be recusing herself from this item. City Attorney Ryan Call briefly reported on this item noting the Tacoma City Ballet has used the Performing Arts& Event Center for performances which fees have not been paid.Ongoing negotiations have not been fruitful and at this time there is a request to authorize civil action to enforce the contractual agreement which was in place for these performances. COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS MOVED TO AUTHORIZE FILING THE PROPOSED CIVIL ACTION; COUNCILMEMBER ASSEFA-DAWSON SECOND. The motion passed 6-0 as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda recused Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes 7. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Assefa-Dawson reported on the National Foundation of Women Legislature Conference she attended in Denver relating to the marijuana industry. She referenced the need for additional research regarding the impact on users and compounds in the products themselves. She believes more education is needed for the public, especially around youth, to ensure people are aware of impacts and to ease their concerns. Councilmember Johnson provided a brief update on the rental inspection program announcing a Landlord Stakeholder Meeting scheduled for September 25 at City Hall and Renter Stakeholder Meetings scheduled for September 24 at Sacajawea Middle School and September 26 at Illahee Middle School. He encouraged stakeholders from both sides of the issues to participate and attend. Councilmember Tran expressed his pleasure at being home after weeks of traveling. He announced the medical mobile van will be in Federal Way to serve individuals who do not have permanent housing. They are scheduled to be at Calvary Lutheran Church on September 12 from 3:30 to 7:30 p.m.; Federal Way Day Center on September 17 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.; and New Hope Fellowship on September 24 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Councilmember Koppang extended appreciation to the Lions Club for the annual Car Show. He shared it is a great event and they have done a greatjob over the years drawing people from around the region to both show and view the car show. He thanked the Parks Department for the Summer Sounds Concerts stating he enjoyed the great music and Steel Lake Park venue. Councilmember Moore encouraged individuals to attend the rental meetings to have their voices heard and allow for a robust conversation. He expressed excitement for the formation of the Senior Advisory Commission and is pleased the appointments have been made and meetings will begin. Councilmember Duclos shared she lost a dear friend at Ocean Shores. She had mentored him on doorbelling and running a race stating he was a good councilmember and friend. Deputy Mayor Honda attended the 12th Annual DESNA Cup and presented volleyball awards. She shared it is the time of year for the Recreation Program book to be sent to residents from the Parks Department; she highlighted it has programs for people of all ages. She also attended the National Foundation of Women Legislators and appreciated the interesting group of women she was able to meet. Her understanding from the conference is that if marijuana is to be used for medical reasons, additional research needs to be conducted to better understand drug interactions and appropriate Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 5 of 6 September 3, 2019 doses; she came away with both questions and answers. 8. ADJOURNMENT There being nothing further on the agenda; the Regular Meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Attest: Stephanie Courtney City Clerk Approved by Council: Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 6 of 6 September 3, 2019 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: -5b CITY OF FEDERAL 'WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITYWIDE GREENWAY PLAN—85%DESIGN STATUS REPORT&AUTHORIZATION TO BID POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize staff to bid the Citywide Greenway Project and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award,further reports,and authorization? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation,Committee MEETING DATE: Sept. 9,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Rick Percz,P.E.,City Traffic Engineer ��(�� . DEPT: Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memo dated September 9,2019 Options Considered: 1) Authorize staff to bid the Citywide Greenway Project and return to the LUTC and Council to award the project to the lowest responsive,responsible bidder. 2) Do not authorize staff to bid this project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the September 17,2019 City Council Consent Agenda'faypproval. 915111 � MAYOR APPROVAL: '" r7 G DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ! 5I 1 1 Gnm . Coun it initialll]ate ]nitial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. 01 i'l' ll-- Mark Koppang,Committee Chair JeqkJohnson,Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to bid the Citywide Greenway Project and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award,further reports, and authorization." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# _ ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: E.J. Walsh,P.E., Public Works Director — Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Citywide Greenway Plan–85%Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid Financial Impacts: This project was included and is projected to be completed within the approved budget under capital project #220. In accordance with the approved budget this project is funded by City funds. Upon completion of this project, ongoing costs associated with operations and maintenance will be performed and funded through streets maintenance. Funding requirements for operations and maintenance of infrastructure is reviewed and adjusted as required during the budget process. Background Information: This project will install wayfinding signs and markings throughout the City directed at bicyclists,but which can also be used by pedestrians. As identified in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which was adopted by City Council in 2012,the intent of the greenway concept is to encourage people who are interested in bicycling and walking for transportation,but intimidated by the roadway environment. It is estimated that 55%of Federal Way residents fall into this category. By addressing roadway conflicts, designating routes utilizing low-volume, low-speed streets,and making minor roadway improvements,it is hoped that the community will come to utilize these routes and feel safe in doing so. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 85%complete, which includes the following completed tasks: • Ordered sign design and fabrication from King County • Project Design to 85% Ongoing Tasks Include: • Project Design to 100% • Contract Specifications PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design(by City staff) $40,000 Sign Fabrication $60,000 2020 Construction Cost $180,000 10%Construction Contingency $18,000 Construction Management(by City staf)) $22,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $320,000 Rev.6/2019 January 8,2018 Land Use and Transportation Committee S Dash Pt Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 2 AVAILABLE FUNDING: City Funds (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax) $320,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $320,000 PROJECT BUDGET SHORTFALL: $0 After receiving bids, the total project costs will be refined and presented to the Committee and Council for bid award authorization. Staff anticipates bidding this project in October 2019. Construction is anticipated to start in Winter 2020 with an estimated substantial completion date in Summer 2020. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 5c - CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:RESOLUTION:KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN- APPROVAL POLICY QUESTION: Shall the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the 2019 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan? COMMITTEE: Land Use&Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: Sept. 9,2019 CATEGORY: Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ® Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste&Recycling Co EPT: Public Works Attachments: Memorandum with attached summary Resolution Options Considered: 1.Approve the Resolution 2. Do not approve the Resolution and provide direction MAYOR'S RECOMMEND ON: Approve the Resolution MAYOR APPROVAL: / j 9 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Z// t—71-Z l 1 Co ne 'CouJJ cil Initial/Date tnitiat-Date Initiaf.,Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:I move to forward the proposed Resolution to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. Lf Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the proposed Resolution." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor EJ Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Director`s _�__ FROM: Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste&Recycling Coordinator SUBJECT: KING COUNTY CWfPRENENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN—APPROVAL BACKGROUND The current Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(Plan) dates back to 2001. Attempts to update the Plan on a regular five-year cycle have been derailed several times, for various reasons: • Unilateral"waste export"decisions (stemming from the County's purchase of the Harbor Island intermodal railroad yard in 2003 without consultation with suburban cities)which incited general city opposition as well as increased involvement in solid waste as a regional issue. The resulting 2006 Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan then served as an interim plan. • System finances (related to County internal charges for landfill"rent"and the timing of repayment of transfer station construction bonds)—which lead to regional deliberations on the system's financial policies,ultimately emphasizing the need to update the Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement(renegotiated from 2010-2012, and widely executed by cities in 2013). • Transfer station capacity in northeast King County (stemining from a group of northeast county cities' interim decision to withdraw from the regional system via rejection of the updated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement).This lead to a series of studies to accommodate this withdrawal. These efforts became moot in 2017 when these cities signaled acceptance of the amended interlocal agreement, allowing definitive planning related to system capacity and distribution of related costs. Despite these delays, regional solid waste management system progress has continued, including: development of permitted disposal capacity at Cedar Hills landfill,construction the new Recycling and Transfer Stations in Shoreline,Bow Lake(Tukwila) and Factoria(Bellevue),and the planned replacement of the Algona Transfer Station(via the new South King County Recycling and Transfer station, scheduled to open in 2023). Regional progress is in large part a result of the Metropolitan Solid Waste Advisory Committee(MSWAC)which began meeting in early 2005 and was permanently established via the amended interlocal agreement.Through MSWAC, cities participate in monthly meetings of elected officials,County representatives and city staff.MSWAC provides a venue for regional and technical issues to be discussed and debated, and serves as a conduit for policy input via bodies such as the Regional Policy Committee and Sound Cities Association. This Plan update process began in earnest in 2017. With the federated system bolstered via uniform adoption of the amended interlocal agreement,the planning process focused primarily on recycling efforts, transfer system development, and disposal options. The major recommendation contained in the September 9,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Award of Contract—Solid Waste Collection Services Page 2 updated Plan is to expand capacity at Cedar Hills landfill—this is the least expensive disposal option, and is in keeping with prior policy-level decisions to also develop additional local landfill capacity. PLAN OVERVIEW AND DISCUSSION Each chapter in the Plan is prefaced by a series of policies, goals,and/or actions. There are 27 policies, 70 actions, and broad goals(concerning zero waste of resources and the aspirational 70%recycling diversion rate). The Plan also designates the parties responsible for implementing various actions. Cities,various King County divisions,haulers,processors, recyclers,the Department of Ecology, and Public Health- Seattle and King County all have roles. Policies provide broad direction and authorization for services and system priorities. Policies should not change through the life of the Plan. Goals reflect the long-term outcomes and aspirations for the regional system. Actions are targeted, specific, and time-based to implement policies and could include:programs, studies,infrastructure improvements, and regulations.Actions are built around ongoing daily service delivery by King County, cities,haulers,recyclers, and other stakeholders.The Plan focus is on those actions that are essential to initiate or continue. Actions may be updated outside of the formal Plan update process to adapt to changing conditions. Key Plan Chapters: The 0I9 Comprehensive Solid %Paste Nl in_aiuc-mcnc Plan is organized into eight chapters and six appendices,totaling over 400 pages. Chapters 4, 5, and 6 form the core of the Plan, supporting the Plan's major recommendations: • Site and construct a new transfer station in the northeast County service area(closing or rebuilding the Houghton Transfer Station [located in Kirkland]); • Further develop the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill capacity, with the intent of using this facility through 2040; and • Establish waste generation and disposal targets and recycling goals Chapter Summaries: The main chapters are highlighted below(though it takes all chapters in combination make a complete plan): Chapter 2: The Existing Solid Waste System.An overview of the garbage and recycling collection systems and facilities in King County and how those systems are integrated to provide safe, affordable,and reliable solid waste collection to the County's residents and businesses. Chapter 3: Forecasting and Data.Focuses on how the recycling and disposal data received from the various sectors(single family,multifamily, commercial, and self-haul)influence operational, programmatic, and educational planning decisions made by the County and cities. Chapter 4: Sustainable Materials Management. Sets this overarching goal: achieve zero waste of resources that have economic value by 2030, and achieve an interim 70%recycling diversion rate, along with waste generation targets, and implementation of related actions.All these targets and actions are geared toward extending the life of the Cedar Hill Regional Landfill through 2040. September 9,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Award of Contract—Solid Waste Collection Services Page 3 Chapter 5: Solid Waste Transfer and Processing. Details the transfer and disposal network in King County, and plans to complete the modernization of the regional transfer station network-including a planned new northeast County transfer station as well as the new South King County Recycling and Transfer Station(being built on the parcel just north of the Algona station)opening in 2023. An important service this new station will provide is a permanent Moderate Risk Waste(MRW) site for small-generator businesses and residences,making it a true"one-stop shop" since the station is also being designed to provide the widest range of recycling services. Aspects of this MRW facility will be highlighted in a related comprehensive plan(also currently undergoing an overdue update): the 2010 Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Chapter 6: Landfill Management and Solid Waste Disposal. Covers current and future methods of ultimate disposal the waste generated via the regional system. Of the three options considered, the Plan recommends the lowest cost option: development of additional local landfill capacity to serve interlocal agreement parties through 2040. Chapter 7: Solid Waste System Finance.This chapter discusses how the various revenues received by the County are used to operate the County's transfer and disposal system, plus and how those revenues are distributed among the County's various cost centers. Plan policies provide the framework to help ensure accountability and transparency in related County financial operations. The attached Planning for ilio l inure ot'Reuiona( \ astt: Njanagement (1-:AQ"s)provides an accessible overview of the Plan and the regional system,with a focus on landfill operations and mitigation of impacts. This also serves as a supplement to Plan Chapter 6, since the FAQ's address a range of concerns raised by landfill expansion opponents during the King County Council's Plan review process. SUMMARY The 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan is a long overdue update to the 2001 Plan, and will be satisfactory for guiding the regional system over the coming years.The plan endorses expansion of disposal capacity at the Cedar Hills landfill—the most cost-effective option. City staff participated in the Plan's development process via the MSWAC forum, and provided comments on the draft versions of the Plan-and its related EIS. The final Plan is modified based on staff comments as summarized in the responsiveness summary(Appendix E). The related Resolution included with this item will confirm City approval of the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. LA King County Department of olid s■rite Division Natural Resources and Par T.. Planning for the Future of Regional Waste Management Frequently Asked Questions on the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Responsible waste management is a top priority as we plan for the economic and environmental future of our region. The 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (Comp Plan) adopted by the King County Council on April 24, 2019, was developed in close cooperation with local jurisdictions, private sector waste management experts, and the input of numerous stakeholders and community members. While it addresses many topics,the plan zeroes in on three key priorities: • Increasing the regional recycling rate from the present 54 percent to 70 percent so these materials can be made into new products. • Expanding and modernizing services at current garbage and recycling transfer stations, and adding new facilities in underserved areas such as northeast and south King County. • Identifying how to dispose of garbage after 2028 when the currently built areas at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill are expected to be full. This document outlines responses to common issues and questions about the Comp Plan and landfill management. Contents BIRDand WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT........................................................................................................................2 BUFFERS/PROPERTY ACQUISITION/FORESTRY.......................................................................................................2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT..................................................................................................................................3 COMP PLAN ADOPTION and UPDATES ............................................................................... ...................4 COST and FINANCES (Comp Plan Alternatives).......................................................................................................6 ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH......................................................................................................................................7 LANDFILLCOVER MATERIAL....................................................................................................................................8 LANDFILL GAS MANAGEMENT................................................................................................................................8 ODOR MANAGEMENT/AIR QUALITY.......................................................................................................................9 RECYCLINGRATES .................................................................................................................................................10 SEISMICCONCERNS...................................................................................................................................... ........ 11 WASTE-TO-ENERGY............................................................................................................................................... 12 WATER QUALITY/AQUIFER.............................................................................................................................. ..... 12 1 iNaste Prevention Resowce Recovery Waste Disposal Solid Waste Division BIRD and WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT What steps are taken to keep animals, especially large birds like eagles, out of the garbage at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill? Operations staff work closely with biologists from the consulting firm Innovative Wildlife Solutions to ensure bird and wildlife protection, and to deter scavenging by the animals. Active areas of the landfill are covered daily to keep animals and birds out of the garbage. Bird control techniques include trapping and culling, and deterrents such as scarecrows and drones. Pyrotechnics are also used from time to time. Eagles' dietary preferences are spawning trout and salmon, followed by other animals and carrion. They are mainly attracted to the landfill because of warmth and absence of human activity. Eagles are protected under the Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, so while our operations cannot harass or harm the birds,they can and do take steps approved by wildlife biologists to make the landfill a less desirable habitat option. Who determines if wildlife control progress is satisfactory? The Comp Plan requires the Solid Waste Division to track and report on its bird management practices. I suspect animals or birds are carrying landfill garbage onto my property. What do I do? Landfill neighbors can call the division at 206-477-4466 to request assistance with removal of refuse deposited by wildlife. Operations will also investigate ways to reduce future incidents. BUFFERS/PROPERTY ACQUISITION/FORESTRY How much buffer separates the landfill from nearby properties? When the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill was originally permitted in the early 1960s, County Commissioners decided it should have a 1,000 foot buffer instead of the 250 foot buffer required by state laws in place at the time. Was there ever encroachment on the buffer? Aerial photos from 1966 show that garbage was improperly buried within the 1,000-foot-buffer on the eastern border near 22 homes. There is no county record to indicate why that was done. 2 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal Solid Waste Division Is King County acquiring homes from property owners near the area where the buffer was reduced? King County has already worked with four willing sellers to purchase their homes, and our offer remains open to the other property owners in that particular area who would be interested in selling. Are there any efforts to improve the buffer zone? Yes. Long term efforts to improve the quality of the buffer include working with a landscape architect from King County Roads to add more trees to the western buffer, and maintaining/restoring the size of the east buffer by acquiring properties from willing sellers along the east buffer. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT What does King County do to understand landfill neighbor concerns? Staying connected with the public, and especially our facility neighbors, is core to our commitment to customer service excellence. Examples of our community engagement since the beginning of 2018 include a 60-day public comment period on the Comp Plan that coincided with a well-advertised online open house and three in-person open houses including one for landfill neighbors. Over the past year, there was one public landfill tour; two semi-annual landfill neighbor meetings; participation in a councilmember's open house last October 2019 for landfill neighbors; public notification plus a two-week comment period on a proposal to temporarily extend hours at Cedar Hills during the Viaduct closure; nine e-newsletters to 590 neighbor subscribers and two mailed letters to about 900 neighbors; and multiple correspondence, phone calls, and face-to-face conversations with neighbors. There is another semi-annual landfill neighbor community meeting scheduled on June 20, 2019. How do the public or cities give feedback to the division? The division has two advisory committees—the Metropolitan Solid Waste Advisory Committee (MSWAC) and the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC). MSWAC comprises staff and elected officials from the cities that participate in the county's regional solid waste system. MSWAC members are appointed by their respective cities. SWAC members are appointed by the Executive and confirmed by the King County Council. SWAC members represent the diverse interests of residents, waste management companies, the recycling industry, public interest groups, labor, local elected officials, recyclable markets, and manufacturers located in King County. SWAC would be the committee landfill neighbors could serve on. 3 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal Solis! Waste Division Are community members invited to serve on the committees or attend the meetings? MSWAC and SWAC monthly meetings are open to the public, and agendas are typically published a week in advance. Minutes are taken at every meeting to summarize presented material, document deliberative discussion of committee business, and to record motions approved by the committee. Meeting minutes from the prior month are presented to committee members for review, and members have the opportunity to request amendments and corrections before minutes are approved by the chair. Landfill neighbors have served on SWAC in the past and we are currently recruiting for a specific committee vacancy to be filled by a landfill neighbor. Serving on the committee does require a commitment—meetings are held each month, usually in downtown Seattle at King Street Center. Although no landfill neighbors have yet expressed an interest, we are hopeful that we will soon benefit from their additional perspective on this important advisory committee. I've heard there has been legal action against the landfill in the past. What's the history there? Cedar Hills was originally permitted at a time when there were few regulations in place to govern the design and operation of landfills. There were also very few neighbors around the facility when it first opened in 1965. Since then, environmental regulations have become increasingly rigorous. As the community around the landfill grew, expectations for how essential public facilities should operate were also raised substantially. Our regulators and elected officials today hold Cedar Hills Landfill accountable for meeting stringent environmental and operational requirements, and for taking all reasonable measures to reduce impacts to the community. Regrettably, problems with landfill operations in years past prompted legal action by people who lived nearby. We've taken a number of corrective actions to address the issues that led to legal settlements, and we are committed to honoring the terms of these agreements moving forward. We have and will continue to honor our settlement agreements. COMP PLAN ADOPTION and UPDATES What is the current situation with regard to capacity at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill? According to population and economic projections, and current recycling rates,the existing cells at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill will be full around 2028. The Comp Plan directs King County to extend 4 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal Solid Waste Division the life of the landfill and gives us the needed time to identify and evaluate the best future disposal alternatives. How is King County planning to further develop the landfill? King County will not expand the landfill beyond its current boundaries. Our long-term plan centers on extending the life of the landfill by maximizing capacity on the existing footprint. This would entail building a new cell, relocating support facilities to a different location on the landfill property, and using that space for solid waste disposal. This could extend the landfill's operational life nearly two decades, and provide enough of a planning window to have a new alternative in place when the landfill closes. What long-term waste disposal alternatives were considered in the Comp Plan? The Comp Plan presented Waste-to-Energy and waste export by rail as alternatives to further landfill development. These alternatives are workable options that come with tradeoffs around cost, environmental impact, community impact and risk. A Waste-to-Energy (mass burn) facility, which would incinerate garbage to generate electricity, offers opportunities to explore advanced technologies for waste disposal. It is the most technically and financially complex option outlined. Rail transport to an out-of-county landfill is a viable alternative. The City of Seattle transports its collected waste to landfills in eastern Washington and Oregon. But rail capacity has limitations, and the increasing demand for rail transport among both public and private entities as our region keeps growing adds uncertainty to the cost and feasibility of this option. After considering the alternatives, the Comp Plan recommends that the Cedar Hills Landfill be further developed, maximizing its capacity as we continue working with public and private partnerships to increase the volume and value of recycling. Further development of the landfill is the most cost- effective and feasible option to serve our region's need for responsible waste disposal at this point in time. The Cedar Hills Regional Landfill will eventually fill up. Future Comp Plan updates will explore alternatives for when local landfill capacity is no longer available. Will the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill ever be allowed to build above its current permitted height? It's important to emphasize that the landfill currently has permitted height requirements, and that King County would not violate the terms of permits or settlement agreements around landfill 5 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal Solid Waste Division development, including height limitations. Any future development at the landfill would be subject to a project planning and permitting process that would involve public notification as well as the opportunity to provide comment or input that would inform design guidelines. How can I get more information on the Solid Waste Comp Plan, or make my views known? People can read the Comp Plan online at www.kitigcouiity.gov/SWDConil)Plan. The Comp Plan is currently undergoing review and approval by the 37 cities that contract with King County for regional waste disposal services. Also, many projects featured in the Comp Plan will have their own unique public processes related to siting, design, permitting and construction. People will continue to have opportunities to be informed and involved in the implementation of projects and programs outlined in the Comp Plan. COST and FINANCES (Comp Plan Alternatives) What is the cost difference between the three disposal options identified in the comp plan? The financial and environmental costs of the viable disposal alternatives were evaluated in the Comp Plan, which is outlined in Table 6-1 on Page 162. Table 6-1. Comparison of key disposal option characteristics (planning level estimates) Comparative Further Develop Waste Export Out-of-County Landfill Facility ma.11111111'....IA Hills Cost per Ton' $41 $55 $136 Life Cycle Greenhoust'`° Gas Emisslons (EPA's ' (134,000) (78,000) 12,000 to 80,0003 WARM Model) MTCO2e MTCO2e MTCO2e CAnnual Greenhouse 91,0004 91,000' 1,200,000 Gas Emissions (EPA's MTCO2e/year MTCO2e/year MTCO2e/year eGGRT) RecycOn4 bate No change No change 2%increase RFt/s`s SERA,Permitting Rail Capacity,Control Siting,Sizing 1 Estimated cost per ton in 2029. 2 WARM model calculation for 2029.(Hing County SWD).For more information,see Appendix D. 3 WARM model calculation.(Normandeau 2017). 4 Landfill options show estimated emissions in 2029. Extending the life of the landfill is the most cost-effective and has the lowest climate impact while we plan for the future of regional waste management after the landfill is full. 6 Waste Disposal Solid Waste Division ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH What about the health and safety of neighbors? The Cedar Hills Regional Landfiii is staffed 2417 `vb'ith skilled professinnals who are trained and certified in the best management practices established by the Solid Waste Association of North America, or SWANA. By far the most commonly reported issue is odor. Protecting our workers and the public is a top priority. Our landfill operations are subject to permit conditions and regulations by Public Health —Seattle & King County, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) and the Washington State Department of Ecology to safeguard public health, the environment, and the nearby community. SWD Operations is responsible for ensuring compliance for 33 groundwater monitoring wells near an aquifer, seven stormwater monitoring points, and over 700 gas wells. We regularly monitor and report on the quality of the air, groundwater, leachate (landfill wastewater) and stormwater, and we restrict or prohibit the disposal of many types of waste that could be harmful or toxic. Greater detail about our environmental monitoring is available in the Cedar Hills Landfill 2018 Annual Report, which is online at https://vour.kingcounty.gov/dnrp library/solid-waste/facilities/CHRLF- annual-report-2018.pdf. People can also call us at 206-477-4466 to request an emailed or paper copy. What does King County do to reduce impacts of the landfill to nearby communities? To control odors and reduce potential for wildlife to get into and carry away garbage, the active areas at the landfill are covered before the end of each working day. Staff also monitor for odors, and specially trained Nasal Rangers on staff do around-the-clock odor checks five times a day. People who notice odors, or any other issue they feel is related to the landfill operations, can call the Solid Waste Division at 206-477-4466 to get a response right away. People should always call 911 first if they believe there is a potential emergency, or a risk to public safety, health or property. Are there unlined areas at the landfill? Environmental controls have been in place at Cedar Hills since the 1980s, and that includes installation of protective bottom linings, as well as covering refuse areas daily to reduce impacts like odors and birds. There are two unlined areas of the landfill —the Main Hill and the Southeast Pit. Both are located on the east side of the landfill and were developed before regulations requiring bottom liners were established. Those two areas are equipped with environmental controls, including having a cap on top to prevent infiltration, as well as leachate and landfill gas collection. 7 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal 31t �; m w r What type of cover material is used at the landfill? King County takes daily action to prevent odors, control wildlife, and deter rodents and pests by covering active areas of the landfill daily. The cover also improves gas collection, which works on a vacuum system. Active area side slopes are covered with soil, and a thick, durable cloth tarp is placed on the top at the end of each working day. When the tarp is covering the area, the landfill gas collection pipes are operating on a vacuum to capture landfill gas and send it to Bio Energy Washington for processing. The type of cover the division is allowed to use is decided by regulators. The Comp Plan directs King County to implement best practices around landfill cover, which is consistent with our current practices, but includes additional reporting requirements. What is the status of energy recovery at the landfill now? It's important to point out that innovation is already happening at our current facilities. Through partnerships with Puget Sound Energy and Bio Energy Washington, landfill gas collected at Cedar Hills produces enough renewable energy to heat 19,000 homes annually, which reduces greenhouse gas emissions and supports broader County goals to address climate change. Some of the gas produced is converted to electricity, some gas is cleaned of impurities and returned to the regional pipeline. Revenue from the landfill gas-to-energy partnership brought in $8 million in 2017 which helps offset solid waste disposal operational costs. How is landfill gas managed? High-tech equipment is used to monitor, control, and measure the landfill gas characteristics and volume as it is captured within the vacuum-based system. King County performs quarterly surface scans of the landfill to seek out potential fugitive emissions and address them as appropriate. It is the frequent re-evaluation of the system performance and maintenance that ensures the system is well- managed and functions optimally. Once collected, landfill gas is conveyed via pipeline to Bio Energy Washington for processing. Some of the gas is converted to electricity for use on site by Bio Energy Washington, however most is cleaned of impurities and made into compressed natural gas and sold to Puget Sound Energy. 8 Waste Preventi0n ReSOL11ce Recovery Waste Disposal Solid Waste Division While international standards for measuring landfill gas vary from country to country, in the U.S.,the EPA serves as the chief regulator and establishes the measurement models. To inform the most accurate data points for input to the EPA models, King County conducts periodic waste characterization studies. What about landfill gas odors? At Cedar Hills, all supervisors, leads and landfill gas operators have been trained to recognize odors and evaluate the source and concentration levels of reported and detected odors.The training also features tools and techniques specifically designed to counteract desensitization to certain odors. The landfill gas staff has developed a site-wide monitoring program to include daily site-wide odor observations five times a day, day and night. These observations are recorded on paper as well as in an electronic database. Anyone who detects the smell of natural gas, or believes there is a gas leak or any other emergency related to landfill operation should call 911. ODOR MANAGEMENT/AIR QUALITY How is air quality managed around the landfill, especially controlling odors? The Cedar Hills Regional Landfill is staffed 24/7 with skilled professionals who are trained and certified in the best management practices established by the Solid Waste Association of North America, or SWANA. Around-the-clock odor checks are conducted five times a day on and offsite on weekdays and three times a day on weekends by operations experts trained in odor detection. In addition to these regularly scheduled checks, specially trained staff monitor areas commonly associated with prior odor complaints. What tools or monitoring devices are used to detect and control odors? The division uses Nasal Ranger training and technology to monitor and detect odors. The Nasal Ranger system is used across many sectors including state and local governments, wastewater treatment operations, landfill operations, environmental health agencies, and even police departments to determine presence and strength of odors. Use of the equipment takes the subjectivity out of odor measurement and provides a consistent standard for field staff to document odor strength. The Nasal Ranger training data is even used as a guide for regulatory enforcement in some jurisdictions. 9 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal Prevention is our most effective strategy. To control odors, and reduce potential for wildlife to get into and carry away garbage,the active areas at the landfill are covered before the end of each working day. Who permits air quality for the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill? Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) serves as the regulator over SWD's operations for all matters relating to air quality. People can call PSCAA to report complaints, but we also ask that they call our 24/7 hotline at 206-477-4466 so we can diagnose and correct any issues that might be related to landfill operation. How many odor complaints were reported in the past year? Puget Sound Clean Air Agency reported 160 complaints called in in 2018. By contrast, in 2018 the division received 14 complaints to SWD's odor hotline. An analysis of the 2018 neighborhood odor checks confirms that refuse accounts for less than five percent of the odors detected. Though neighbors always have the option to contact PSCAA, we encourage them to contact us as well because if there is a problem related to our operation, we can take corrective action right away. I live near the landfill. If I detect odors of garbage or natural gas,who do I call? Anyone who detects the smell of natural gas, or believes there is a gas leak or any other landfill- related emergency should call 911. Neighbors are encouraged to report a non-emergency problem by calling our 24/7 hotline at 206- 477-4466. Complaints to the issue-reporting hotline receive immediate response. RECYCLING R How does the Comp Plan address recycling? The Comp Plan identifies strategies for how the County will manage recycling for the next six to 20 years. Developed with the division's partnering cities and two advisory committees, a main priority of the 2019 Plan is how to achieve a 70 percent recycling rate. The current recycling rate in King County is 54 percent, far exceeding the national average of 34 percent. But we can do more. We estimate as much as 70 percent of what goes to the landfill every day—about 95 semi-truckloads—is recyclable or reusable material. What are some specific examples of recycling actions outlined in the Comp Plan? 10 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery baste Disposal Solid Waste Division The 2019 Plan provides a menu of recycling actions cities and the county can take to enhance recycling in their jurisdictions. For example, about a third of the material that goes to the landfill is food waste that could be composted and used to nourish crops and return nutrients to the soil. King County convened an Organics Summit earlier this spring comprised of cities, haulers, waste management experts and academics to identify strategies to develop markets for this material. Construction and demolition waste (C&D) makes up one-third of the solid waste generated in the county. King County requires that readily recyclable C&D materials (metal, cardboard, wood, concrete, asphalt, brick and drywall) be recycled, which furthers the division's Zero Waste and carbon emissions reduction efforts. In 2018, the division added an additional C&D recycling facility to the privately managed locations that manage C&D, bringing the total number of approved facilities to fourteen. Education is also part of our strategy. A record 245 King County schools (more than 151,000 students) are currently participating in the Green Schools program that helps teach students important lessons on recycling and conservation. New features of the program include a food rescue initiative that diverts unopened and uneaten food from being wasted. In 2018, nearly 13,000 of food and drinks were rescued and redistributed to communities in need. Finally, we're making our services more accessible and affordable as part of our commitment to equity and social justice.The new Cleanup LIFT program, modeled after Metro Transit's Orca LIFT, provides a $12 discount to low-income self-haul customers who recycle yard waste, clean wood and refrigerant-type appliances at a County recycling and transfer station. Which areas have the highest recycling rates? Recycling rates vary among our regional communities. Single family recycling rates range from a high of 65 percent in some areas to as low as 34 percent. For multi-family housing, rates range from 61 percent to as low as 5 percent. Education is an important part of recycling, as is ongoing coordination with haulers and cities. People can make the biggest environmental impact by recycling right. That means making sure recyclable materials are empty, clean and dry before being put in the bin. SEISMIC CONCERNS Are there known faults on or close to the landfill? 11 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal -' lid Waste Division According to the most recent studies to inform landfill development, there are no known earthquake faults within a mile of the Cedar Hills Landfill. The new landfill cells are not located in any known seismic impact zone nor within a mile of any Holocene faulting (activity in the last 11,000 years), which is a Washington Administrative Code (WAC) requirement. Is King County considering a Waste-to-Energy facility? King County is open to the possibility of new technologies for regional waste management, and future comprehensive plan updates could further explore new alternatives, including a Waste-to-Energy option. But without further development, the landfill is currently slated to reach capacity by 2028 and a nine-year time frame to site, permit, build, finance and commission a complex facility is not realistic. A Waste-to-Energy facility still requires landfill disposal capacity. What about the possibility of a waste-to-energy facility in the future after Cedar Hills is full? The Comp Plan directs King County's Performance, Strategy, and Budget (PSB) office to work with the Solid Waste Division to prepare a progress report by December 31, 2021 on long-term disposal options. Concurrently, PSB is managing a consultant contract for a waste-to-energy study that is scheduled for completion by October 2019. The study will help inform future work. In consultation with our city partners, it is anticipated that the post-Cedar Hills disposal method will be selected as part of the next Comp Plan update. King County is open to the possibility of new technologies for regional waste management, and future comprehensive plan updates could further explore new alternatives, including a Waste-to-Energy option. We recognize many in our region are supporters of this option, and invite them to engage in with other stakeholders and community members in regional discussions around future planning efforts. WATER QUALITY/AQUIFER What steps does King County take to protect water quality? The division is responsible for routine water quality monitoring and reporting on 68 groundwater wells onsite and around the site perimeter. 12 Waste Prevention Resotm a Recovery Waste Disposal Solid Waste Division A regional aquifer flows beneath portions of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill from the South to the Eastern border. SWD monitors the regional aquifer at 19 wells on a quarterly basis and monitors an additional 14 wells semi-annually. Incoming water quality is impacted by the former Queen City Farm, a Superfund site Boeing is responsible to clean up, which is located just to the south of Cedar Hills. Our monitoring shows that groundwater leaving the landfill site is in compliance with federal drinking water standards. I heard that an aquifer near the landfill is at risk of contamination by 2058. Is that true? No. The aquifer beneath the landfill is not at risk of contamination in 2058 because action is underway now to address legacy contamination that originated at a Boeing-managed Superfund site south of the landfill. A remediation study is being developed to identify the most appropriate cleanup actions of the historic contamination and to ensure it doesn't leave the site. Portions of the study have already been approved by Ecology while exploration of additional efforts is pursued. The former Queen City Farm, now a Superfund site Boeing is responsible to clean up, was found to have contributed to historic contamination discovered at Cedar Hills in the 1980s that was confined to areas of the landfill that continue to be closely monitored. King County continues to send our quarterly groundwater reports and annual reports to the EPA and Boeing. Alternate formats available: 206-477-4466, TTY Relay: 711 13 Waste Prevention Resource Recovery Waste Disposal RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City of Federal Way, Washington, approving the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan for the King County Solid Waste System. WHEREAS,the purpose of the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan("2019 Plan") is to plan for solid waste and recycling collection, handling and management services, infrastructure, and programs in the geographic area for which King County has comprehensive planning authority for solid waste management by law and by interlocal agreement, and; WHEREAS,the 2019 Plan was prepared in accordance with RCW 70.95.080,which requires that each county within the state, in cooperation with the various cities located within such county, prepare and periodically update a coordinated, comprehensive solid waste management plan; and WHEREAS, King County and cities in King County have executed the 2013 Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement ("the interlocal agreement"). Under the interlocal agreement, King County serves as the planning authority for solid waste; and WHEREAS, King County and city representatives serving on the Metropolitan Solid Waste Advisory Committee worked cooperatively to develop the 2019 Plan; and WHEREAS, the 2019 Plan updates and replaces the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan approved by City Ordinance 02-416 adopted on March 23, 2002; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2019 the King County Regional Policy Committee, acting as the Metropolitan King County Council Solid Waste Interlocal Forum, recommended adoption of Ordinance 18893 for approval of the 2019 Plan; and Resolution No. 19- Page I of 3 WHEREAS, on April 24, 2019 the Metropolitan King County Council adopted Ordinance 18893, which preliminarily approved the 2019 Plan; and WHEREAS, after City approval, the 2019 Plan is further subject to final approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology; and WHEREAS, City staff reviewed the plan and determined that related issues affecting the City have been satisfactorily addressed. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved and adopted by reference. Section 2. Severability. If any section,sentence,clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this resolution are authorized to make necessary corrections to this resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 4. Ratification.Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council, Resolution No. 19- Page 2 of 3 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON this day of 20—. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: JIM FERRELL, MAYOR ATTEST: STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. RYAN CALL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: _ PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: Resolution No. 19- Page 3 of 3 LMKing oun Updated April 17, ' Department of Natural Resources and Parks Solid Waste Division Attachment A Updated April 17, 2019 f *0 all, 1A r � ■ 1 P zol9 Com rehensive Solid Waste Management Plan July 2018 .�4 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Solid Waste Division p 2019 Com rehensive Solid Waste Management Plan July 2018 Updated April 17, 2019 Alternate formats available 206-477-4466;TTY relay: 711 www.kingcountyr_gov/solidwaste 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 � Att A Page 2 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Acknowledgements Prepared by King County Solid Waste Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks 201 South Jackson Street,Suite 701 Seattle,WA 98104-3855 kingcounty.gov/solidwaste Pat D.McLaughlin, Division Director Glynda Stein,Assistant Division Director Meg Moorehead,Strategy,Communications and Performance Manager Jeff Gaisford,Recycling and Environmental Services Manager Eben Sutton, Enterprise Services Manager Aaron Jeide, Human Resources Manager Neil Fujii, Facilities Engineering and Science Unit Manager Bill Berni,Operations Manager In collaboration with: Solid Waste Advisory Committee April Atwood,Vice-Chair Kim Kaminski David Baker Phillippa Kassover Elly Bunzendahl Kevin Kelly,Chair Joe Casalini Keith Livingston Gib Dammann Ken Marshall Karen Dawson Barb Ristau Jean Garber Stephen Strader Mason Giem Penny Sweet David Hill Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee City of Algona City of Kirkland City of Auburn City of Lake Forest Park City of Bellevue City of Maple Valley City of Black Diamond City of Mercer Island City of Bothell City of Newcastle City of Burien City of Normandy Park City of Clyde Hill City of Redmond City of Covington City of Renton City of Des Moines City of Sammamish City of Enumclaw City of SeaTac City of Federal Way City of Shoreline City of Issaquah City of Snoqualmie City of Kenmore City of Woodinville City of Kent 11 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 3 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 King County Executive Dow Constantine Department of Natural Resources and Parks Christie True, Director Bob Burns, Deputy Director King County Council Rod Dembowski, District 1 Larry Gossett, District 2 Kathy Lambert,Council Vice Chair, District 3 Jeanne Kohl-Welles, District 4 Dave Upthegrove, District 5 Claudia Balducci, District 6 Pete von Reichbauer, District 7 Joe McDermott,Council Chair, District 8 Reagan Dunn, District 9 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Hi Att A Page 4 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................. ii Acronyms and Abbreviations,and Common Terms ................................................ x Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................. x Common Terms .............................................................................. A Executive Summary .............................................................................. xv Chapter 1 Introduction Summary of the Plan Organization................................................................ 1-2 Chapter 2 The Existing Solid Waste System Policies Figure 2-1. King County service area ...................................................... 2-2 The Solid Waste System........................................................................... 2-3 Collection of Solid Waste and Recyclables..................................................... 2-3 Figure 2-2.The Solid Waste System ........................................................ 2-4 Transfer...................................................................................... 2-6 Figure 2-3.Map of transfer station locations ............................................... 2-7 Processing of Commingled Recyclables ....................................................... 2-8 Figure 2-4. Locations of composting,materials recovery,and designated construction and demolition recycling and disposal facilities............................... 2-9 Table 2-1.Materials recovery facilities locations and tons processed in 2017................. 2-10 Disposal ..................................................................................... 2-10 Figure 2-5.Current layout of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill............................... 2-11 Figure 2-6.Landfill gas-to-energy process.................................................. 2-12 Solid Waste System Planning ................................................................. 2-13 Table 2-2. Roles in regional planning and administration ................................... 2-15 Trends in Solid Waste Management ............................................................... 2-18 Leading the Way in Waste Prevention, Recycling and Product Stewardship ..................... 2-18 Expanding the Collection of Recyclable and Degradable Materials ............................. 2-19 Building a New Generation of Transfer Stations................................................ 2-19 Managing Solid Waste Disposal with an Eye to the Future.......................................... 2-21 Financing the Solid Waste System for the Long Term........................................... 2-21 Protecting Natural Resources through Environmental Stewardship............................. 2-21 Additional Planning Considerations............................................................... 2-22 ClimateChange.............................................................................. 2-22 Equity and Social Justice...................................................................... 2-25 iv 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 5 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Chapter 3 Forecasting and Data Policies Summary of Recommended Actions Forecasting....................................................................................... 3-1 Figure 3-1.Transfer station service areas population 2025-2040............................. 3-3 Figure 3-2. Estimated share of population increase 2025-2040 for transfer station service areas .............................................................. 3-4 Figure 3-3. Projection of solid waste recycled and disposed 2018-2040 ..................... 3-4 Current Data on Regional Waste Generation, Recycling,and Disposal............................... 3-5 Figure 3-4.2015 Recycling and disposal by generator type ................................. 3-5 Single-Family Residents ...................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3-5.2015 Recycling and disposal by single-family residents.......................... 3-6 Multi-Family Residents ....................................................................... 3-7 Figure 3-6.2015 Recycling and disposal by multi-family residents .......................... 3-7 Non-Residential Generators................................................................... 3-8 Figure 3-7.2015 Recycling and disposal by non-residential generators...................... 3-8 Self-haulers .................................................................................. 3-9 Figure 3-8.2015 Recycling and disposal by transfer facility self-haulers ..................... 3-9 Generators of Construction and Demolition Debris............................................ 3-9 Figure 3-9.2015 Construction and demolition materials diverted and disposed............. 3-10 Tracking Progress................................................................................. 3-10 Tonnage and Transaction Data................................................................ 3-11 Reports from the Commercial Collection Companies .......................................... 3-11 Ecology Survey Data.......................................................................... 3-12 Waste Characterization Studies ............................................................... 3-12 Solid Waste Characterization Studies.......................................................... 3-13 Organics Characterization Studies ............................................................ 3-14 Construction and Demolition Debris Characterization Studies ................................. 3-14 PlanningTools.................................................................................... 3-14 Plans and Studies ............................................................................ 3-15 Evaluation of Technologies ................................................................... 3-16 Waste Prevention and Recycling Studies ...................................................... 3-16 Other Plans Considered ...................................................................... 3-17 Chapter 4 Sustainable Materials Management Policies Summary of Recommended Actions Benefits of Recycling Efforts ...................................................................... 4-2 Goaland Targets.................................................................................. 4-3 Figure 4-1.Organics:Opportunities,values,and benefits in King County.................... 4-4 Figure 4-2. Recycling rate over time........................................................ 4-6 Figure 4-3.One approach of regional cooperation toward 70%recycling goal using collective mandatory actionS .................................... 4-7 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-judy 2018 V Att A Page 6 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Tools Used to Meet the Recommended Goal and Targets ...................................... 4-8 Table 4-1. Examples of successes achieved using various tools.............................. 4-8 Taking a Sustainable Materials Management Approach ............................................ 4-10 Figure 4-4.Materials life cycle ...................................................................4-10 Design and Production ....................................................................... 4-11 Useand Reuse ............................................................................... 4-11 End-of-Life Management..................................................................... 4-12 Turning Wastes to Resources ..................................................................... 4-13 Table 4-2. Designated recyclables ......................................................... 4-14 Figure 4-5. Recycling potential of materials disposed in 2015............................... 4-15 Priority Materials ............................................................................. 4-16 Organics ..................................................................................... 4-16 Priority Materials for Collection at King County Transfer Facilities............................... 4-17 Markets for Recyclable Materials .................................................................. 4-17 LinkUp-Expanding Markets for Recyclable and Reusable Materials............................ 4-17 2015 and 2017 Market Assessments........................................................... 4-18 Table 4-3. Findings from 2015 and 2017 market assessments ............................... 4-18 Grantsto Cities................................................................................... 4-19 Waste Reduction and Recycling Grants........................................................ 4-19 Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance Grants.................................................. 4-20 Competitive Grant Program................................................................... 4-20 Sustainable Purchasing ........................................................................... 4-20 Collection ....................................................................................... 4-21 Residential Collection ........................................................................ 4-21 Table 4-4.Summary of single-family collection for garbage,recycling,and organics in King County................................................................... 4-22 Table 4-5.Single-family minimum collection standards..................................... 4-30 Multi-Family Residential Collection............................................................ 4-30 Table 4-6. Multi-family minimum collection standards ..................................... 4-31 Non-Residential Collection ................................................................... 4-33 Construction and Demolition Materials Collection and Recycling .............................. 4-35 Table 4-7. Designated facilities for non-recyclable construction and demolition waste(July 2018).......................................................... 4-36 Table 4-8. Designated facilities for recyclable construction and demolition waste(July 2018).............................................................. 4-37 Vi 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 7 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Chapter 5 Solid Waste Transfer and Processing Policies Summary of Recommended Actions The Transfer System and Services ................................................................. 5-1 Figure 5-1. Locations of solid waste facilities ............................................... 5-2 Table 5-1.Current facilities and services.................................................... 5-3 Resource Recovery at Transfer Stations........................................................ 5-5 Services for Moderate Risk Wastes ............................................................ 5-5 Collection of Sharps.......................................................................... 5-6 Trends in Transfer Station Usage .................................................................. 5-7 Figure 5-2.Total tons processed at transfer facilities and disposed at Cedar Hills (1990-2017)................................................................ 5-7 Figure 5-3. Percent of tons and transactions at transfer facilities by hauler type(2017)....... 5-8 Evaluation and Planning for the Urban Transfer Stations ........................................... 5-9 The Planning Process......................................................................... 5-9 Service Level Evaluation Criteria .............................................................. 5-11 Table 5-2. Key service level criteria applied to urban transfer stations ....................... 5-15 Plans for the Urban Transfer Stations .............................................................. 5-16 Figure 5-4. Locations of existing and planned solid waste facilities.......................... 5-17 Table 5-3.Timeline for the facility renovation plan.......................................... 5-18 Transfer Facility Siting ........................................................................ 5-18 Siting a New South County Recycling and Transfer Station .................................... 5-18 Providing Transfer Capacity in the Northeast Service Area...................................... 5-19 A New Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station is Recommended............................. 5-19 Other Northeast Capacity Options Considered ................................................ 5-20 Table 5-4.Comparison of key characteristics of three transfer options considered ........... 5-21 Evaluation and Planning for the Rural Transfer Facilities............................................ 5-21 CityMitigation ................................................................................... 5-23 Transfer Services after an Emergency.............................................................. 5-24 Processing Collected Materials.................................................................... 5-25 Processing Commingled Recyclables.......................................................... 5-25 Processing Organics.......................................................................... 5-26 Table 5-5. Regional compost facilities...................................................... 5-26 Emerging Processing Technologies................................................................ 5-28 Anaerobic Digestion.......................................................................... 5-28 Advanced Materials Recovery................................................................. 5-28 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 v i i Att A Page 8 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Chapter 6 Landfill Management and Solid Waste Disposal Policies Summary of Recommended Actions Current Disposal at the Cedar Hills Landfill ........................................................ 6-1 Diversion of Waste................................................................................ 6-2 Current Strategies for Waste Diversion ........................................................ 6-2 Potential Strategies for Waste Diversion ....................................................... 6-2 Operational Efficiencies ...................................................................... 6-2 New Area Development .......................................................................... 6-3 The Next Disposal Method ....................................................................... 6-5 A Disposal Method Must Be Selected as Part of This Plan's Approval............................ 6-5 Further Development of Cedar Hills is Recommended ......................................... 6-5 Table 6-1.Comparison of key disposal option characteristics(planning level estimates) ..... 6-6 Other Long-Term Disposal Options Considered.................................................... 6-7 WasteExport................................................................................. 6-7 Waste to Energy Facility ...................................................................... 6-7 NextSteps ....................................................................................... 6-8 Technologies for the Future ...................................................................... 6-9 Disposal of Special Wastes ........................................................................ 6-11 Managing Illegal Dumping and Litter ............................................................. 6-12 Illegaldumping .............................................................................. 6-12 Table 6-2. Illegal dumping clean-up responsibilities ........................................ 6-13 Community Litter Cleanup.................................................................... 6-13 Secure Your Load............................................................................. 6-13 Disposal Services after an Emergency............................................................. 6-14 Restoration of Closed Landfills.................................................................... 6-15 Post-Closure Monitoring and Maintenance.................................................... 6-15 Figure 6-1.Map of closed landfills ......................................................... 6-16 Beneficial Reuse of Landfill Properties......................................................... 6-17 Other beneficial uses......................................................................... 6-17 Chapter 7 Solid Waste System Finance Policies Summary of Recommended Actions Funding of Solid Waste Services and Programs .................................................... 7-1 Figure 7-1.Solid Waste Division fund structure............................................. 7-2 Solid Waste Division Revenues................................................................ 7-3 Figure 7-2. Projected sources of revenue 2017 and 2018.................................... 7-4 Solid Waste Division Expenditures ............................................................ 7-5 Figure 7-3.2017 Budgeted expenditures................................................... 7-5 Influences on Future Costs and Revenue .......................................................... 7-8 Interest Earnings ............................................................................. 7-8 Waste Prevention and Recycling .............................................................. 7-8 Viii 2019 Comp2-ehen5zveS01zd Waste Management Plan-jVy2018 Att A Page 9 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Operational Efficiencies....................................................................... 7-9 Potential Changes in the Fee Structure........................................................ 7-9 Closure of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill ........................................................ 7-10 New Revenue Sources ............................................................................ 7-10 Sales from the Landfill Gas-to-Energy Facility.................................................. 7-10 Resource Recovery at Transfer Stations........................................................ 7-11 Fees from Materials Collected at the Transfer Stations.......................................... 7-11 Chapter 8 References Appendix A- Utilities and Transportation Commission Cost Assessment Appendix B- Six Year Capital Improvement Program Appendix C-Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement Appendix D-Waste Reduction Model (WARM) Inputs Used in Analysis Appendix E - Responsiveness Summary Appendix F - Descriptions of Disposal Options Considered Appendix G -Agency Plan Review Letters Appendix H -Title 10 Plan Content Code Requirements Att A Page 10 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Acronyms and Abbreviations, and Common Terms Acronyms and Abbreviations 2001 Plan . . . . . . . . . . . 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan AD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . anaerobic digestion ADC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . alternative daily cover AMR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . advanced materials recovery BEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bio Energy Washington C&D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . construction and demolition debris CERP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital Equipment Recovery Program dBA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . decibel DNRP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Department of Natural Resources and Parks Ecology. . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington State Department of Ecology EIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . environmental impact statement EECBG . . . . . . . . . . . . . Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . expanded polystyrene FEMA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Federal Emergency Management Agency GHG. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . greenhouse gas HDPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . high-density polyethylene plastic HHW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . household hazardous waste ILA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . interlocal agreement ITSG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interjurisdictional Technical Staff Group KCC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . King County Code KCSWD . . . . . . . . . . . . . King County Solid Waste Division LDPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . low-density polyethylene plastic LEED.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design TI LHWMP. . . . . . . . . . . . . Local Hazardous Waste Management Program LRF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Landfill Reserve Fund MFS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling MRF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . materials recovery facility MSWMAC . . . . . . . . . . . Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee MTCO2e . . . . . . . . . . . . metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent MW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . megawatt NWPSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . Northwest Product Stewardship Council PET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . polyethylene terephthalate plastic PSCAA . . . . . . . . . . . . . Puget Sound Clean Air Agency PSRC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Puget Sound Regional Council Public Health . . . . . . . . . Public Health-Seattle&King County PVC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . polyvinyl chloride plastic RAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . recycled asphalt shingles RCW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revised Code of Washington SAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Siting Advisory Committee SEPA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State Environmental Policy Act X 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 11 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Site Development Plan. . . Cedar Hills Regional Landfill Site Development Plan SWAC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Solid Waste Advisory Committee SWIF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Solid Waste Interlocal Forum Transfer Plan . . . . . . . . . Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan UASI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Urban Area Security Initiative UTC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission WAC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington Administrative Code WPR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . waste prevention and recycling Common Terms alternative daily cover-cover material other than earthen material which is placed on the surface of the active face of a municipal solid waste landfill at the end of each operating day to control vectors,fires,odors,blowing litter, and scavenging. advanced materials recovery -uses manual methods and advanced technology to separate all usable,recyclable, and compostable material from the waste stream and ensure that these valuable materials are available for use and not sent to the landfill. basic fee-the per-ton fee charged to customers disposing of municipal solid waste at transfer facilities. biochar-charcoal produced from plant matter and stored in the soil as a means of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. biosolids-refers to treated sewage sludge that meets the Environmental Protection Agency pollutant and pathogen requirements for land application and surface disposal. clean wood-unpainted and untreated wood,including pallets and wood from construction and demolition projects. commercial collection company(hauler)-a private-sector company that collects garbage,recyclables,and organics from residents and businesses. compost-the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic waste,including yard waste,food scraps,and food-soiled paper,which is beneficial to plant growth when used as a soil amendment. construction and demolition debris(C&D)-recyclable and non-recyclable materials that result from construction,remodeling,repair or demolition of buildings,roads or other structures,and requires removal from the site of construction or demolition.Construction and demolition debris does not include land clearing materials such as soil,rock,and vegetation. climate change-changes in the long-term trends in average weather patterns of a region,including the frequency, duration,and intensity of wind and snow storms,cold weather and heat waves,drought,and flooding;climate change is attributed primarily to the emission of greenhouse gases,including such compounds as carbon dioxide and methane. debris management site-temporary site where debris can be taken after a major emergency,such as flood, windstorm,or earthquake,until it can be sorted for recycling or proper disposal. diversion-any legal practice or program that diverts solid waste from disposal in the landfill. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2028 • Att A Page 12 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 drop box-scaled-down transfer facility,designed to provide cost-effective convenient drop-off services for garbage and recycling primarily for self-haulers in the rural areas of the county. equity-when all people have an equal opportunity to attain their full potential. Inequity occurs when there are differences in well-being between and within communities that are systematic,patterned,unfair,and can be changed; they are not random,as they are caused by our past and current decisions,systems of power and privilege,policies, and the implementation of those policies. G-certificate-a permit granting commercial solid waste hauling companies authority to operate in a specific area. The permit is issued by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission. green building-the practice of creating and using healthier and more resource-efficient methods of construction, renovation,operation,maintenance,and demolition of buildings and other structures. greenhouse gas-any gas that contributes to the"greenhouse effect"such as carbon dioxide,methane,nitrous- oxide,chlorofluorocarbons,chlorodifluoromethane,perfluoroethane,and sulfur hexafluoride. host city-a city that has a county transfer facility within its incorporated boundaries. industrial waste stabilizer-material which is mixed with industrial ash to structurally stabilize the ash. King County designates the use of construction and demolition debris residuals for industrial waste stabilizer at disposal. interlocal agreement-an agreement between a city and the county for participation in the King County solid waste system. landfill gas-gas generated through the decomposition of waste buried in the landfill,which consists of about 50 to 60 percent methane and about 40 to 50 percent carbon dioxide,with less than 1 percent oxygen,nitrogen,and other trace gases. leachate-water that percolates through garbage at the landfill and requires collection and treatment before being sent to a wastewater treatment plant. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design"(LEED°)-a recognized standard for measuring building sustainability;the rating system evaluates buildings in six areas:sustainable site development,water savings,energy efficiency,materials and resources selection,indoor environmental quality,and innovation and design. materials recovery facility-uses manual methods and advanced technology to separate collected recyclable materials. municipal solid waste or MSW-includes garbage(putrescible wastes) and rubbish (nonputrescible wastes), except recyclables that have been source-separated;the residual from source-separated recyclables is MSW. non-residential generator-businesses,institutions,and government entities that generate solid waste. organics-yard waste,food scraps,and food-soiled paper. product stewardship or producer responsibility-an environmental management strategy whereby manufacturers take responsibility for minimizing a product's environmental impact throughout all stages of a product's life cycle,including end of life management. xi i 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 13 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 regional direct fee-a discounted fee charged to commercial collection companies that haul solid waste to Cedar Hills from their own transfer stations and processing facilities,thus bypassing county transfer stations. self-hauler-anyone who brings garbage,recyclables,and/or yard waste to division transfer facilities except a commercial collection company. social justice-encompasses all aspects of justice,including legal,political,and economic;it demands fair distribution of public goods,institutional resources,and life opportunities. solid waste-all materials discarded including garbage,recyclables,and organics. special waste-wastes that have special handling needs or have specific waste properties that require waste clearance before disposal.These wastes include contaminated soil,asbestos-containing materials,wastewater treatment plant grit,industrial wastes,and other wastes. standard curbside recyclables-glass and plastic containers,tin and aluminum cans,mixed waste paper, newspaper,and cardboard. sustainability-an approach to growth and development that balances social needs and economic opportunities with the long-term preservation of a clean and healthy natural environment.This approach to action and development integrates environmental quality,social equity,fiscal responsibility,and economic vitality. tipping fee-a per-ton fee charged to dispose waste at solid waste facilities. vector-is an organism that does not cause disease itself but which spreads infection by conveying pathogens from one host to another such as a mosquito or rat. waste conversion technologies -non-incineration technologies that use thermal,chemical,or biological processes,sometimes combined with mechanical processes,to convert the post-recycled or residual portion of the municipal solid waste stream to electricity,fuels,and/or chemicals that can be used by industry. waste generation-waste disposed plus materials recycled. waste prevention-the practice of creating less waste,which saves the resources needed to recycle or dispose of it such as choosing to purchase items with less or no packaging. waste-to-energy technologies -recover energy from municipal solid waste and include both waste conversion technologies and incineration with energy recovery,such as mass burn waste-to-energy,refuse derived fuel,and advanced thermal recycling. zero waste of resources or zero waste-a planning principle designed to eliminate the disposal of materials with economic value.Zero waste does not mean that no waste will be disposed;it proposes that maximum feasible and cost-effective efforts be made to prevent,reuse,and recycle waste. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-judy 2018 AN Att A Page 14 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Executive Summary This Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (Plan)sets strategies for managing solid waste in King County over the next six to 20 years. Required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70.95,this Plan will guide actions by King County,all cities in King County except Seattle and Milton,and private companies that provide curbside collection and processing of recyclable materials. This Plan addresses the many public and private components of the regional solid waste system,including: • The King County Solid Waste Division's (division's) operation of the Cedar Hills regional landfill,ten transfer facilities,nine closed landfills,and many programs to prevent and recycle waste; • City efforts to promote recycling and provide for curbside pick-up of materials,either as a direct city service or through contracts with private haulers;and • Private companies'collection of materials at the curbside and operation of processing facilities that convert recyclable and organic materials into marketable products. Partnerships among system participants are key to the successful implementation of this Plan.In 2018,the final city signed the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement,securing participation of all 37 partner cities through 2040.This milestone reaffirms the county's responsibility to provide disposal through 2040,allows costs and risks to be shared across the large regional customer base,and strengthens opportunities to work together to achieve environmental goals. This Plan benefitted from extensive public input including nearly two years of collaboration between the division and its two advisory committees.The input helped the Plan address time-critical service choices facing the regional system: Recycling.Waste prevention and recycling are long-standing priorities.Much progress has been made through expanded recycling options and services,customer education,and other means. However the region's recycling percentage still hovers in the low 50s and stronger markets for recyclables are needed in light of factors such as China's recent import restrictions on recyclable materials.This Plan offers a variety of waste prevention and recycling approaches that allow system participants to tailor approaches to their jurisdiction's needs while working together to harmonize approaches to achieve better results for the region. Transfer.This Plan recommends the continued modernization of the transfer system.Station upgrades are completed or underway in all urban areas (except for Northeast King County)to improve services and meet future needs.This Plan recommends that the 1960s era Houghton station in Kirkland be replaced with a modern station so that equitable levels of service are available throughout the urban area including the fast- growing Northeast part of King County. Disposal.The Cedar Hills Regional Landfill has provided cost-effective,environmentally responsible waste disposal for more than 50 years.Built capacity at the landfill will be exhausted in 2028 however,leaving only ten years to put the next disposal method in place.To meet disposal needs,this Plan recommends further development of Cedar Hills to maximize disposal capacity,while affirming that garbage shall not be disposed of,nor shall soils be stockpiled,within 1,000 feet of the property line at the landfill,in accordance with the Settlement Agreement.To account for technological advances,this Plan does not specify the next disposal method after ultimate closure of Cedar Hills. Evaluation of future disposal methods will begin before the next plan update. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july2018 XV Att A Page 15 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Although many challenges lie ahead for the regional solid waste system,working together under this Plan,system participants can achieve more through collective effort that continues the region's commitment to customer-oriented environmentally responsible solid waste services. Xvi 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 16 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Introduction 1r r x X r Att A Page 17 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Tntr,oQduction This Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(Plan) proposes strategies for managing King County's solid waste over the next six years,with consideration of the next 20 years.The Plan was prepared by the Solid Waste Division (the division)of the Department of Natural Resources(DNRP)and Parks in accordance with the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70.95 and in cooperation with its advisory committees-the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee(MSWMAC)and the Solid Waste Advisory Committee(SWAC).MSWMAC represents the 37 cities in King County that are signatories to the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement(Amended and Restated ILA),the foundation of the King County solid waste system.This Plan revises the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(2001 Plan),and builds upon the 2006 Transfer and Waste Management Plan(Transfer Plan). With this Plan,the division embraces the DNRP's mission to foster sustainable and livable communities by focusing on these critical areas:environmental quality,equity and social justice,fiscal responsibility,and economic vitality. The division is building upon past and current efforts to increase waste prevention and recycling while advancing green building practices in the region's communities and within its own operations.The division continues to refine operational practices and facility designs in ways that further reduce its carbon footprint and promote the greening of natural and built environments.The participants in the countywide solid waste management system-from the 37 cities within the county's borders to the private-sector collection and processing companies to individual businesses and residents-are contributing to these vital efforts in their own operations and practices. Mie Y !, y. v AL A , r • viii �. +. f�.af �� , ,� i �, 'I ,"i � r+ - _,,. .. _. ..."r iH"•"�..orR.'r'AYxY,. :�. i�'Y°f�_�'a�r °� ' 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 � Att A Page 18 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Since its inception in 1969,the core mission of the division has been to ensure that residents and businesses in the county have access to safe,reliable,efficient,and affordable solid waste handling and disposal services.The last few decades have brought about significant developments in the management of solid waste,stemming not only from advances in technology and the changing marketplace,but from a widespread recognition of the importance of waste prevention,resource conservation,sustainable development and environmental stewardship. Over time,the management of solid waste has evolved from a relatively simple system of garbage collection and disposal to a much more complex network of collection,transportation,and processing for garbage,recyclables, organics(yard waste and food scraps),and construction and demolition debris.This integrated network combines the infrastructure and services of both the public and private sectors to provide long-term capacity for solid waste management in the region. Summary of the Plan Organization This Plan is organized to guide the reader through the major elements of the solid waste system.Within each chapter are elements as described below: Goals reflect the long-term outcomes and aspirations for the regional system.Goals should not change through the life of the Plan. Policies provide broad direction and authorization for services and system priorities. Policies should not change through the life of the Plan. Actions are targeted,specific,and time-based to implement policies and could include:programs,studies, infrastructure improvements,and regulations.Actions are built on a foundation of daily service delivery by the county, cities,and other stakeholders.This Plan does not attempt to describe every solid waste task in the regional system. It lists only those that are particularly important to initiate or continue.Actions may be updated outside of the formal Plan update process to adapt to changing conditions.The Summary of Recommended Actions table in each chapter includes a page number to indicate where information related to each action can be found in that chapter. Following the table of contents is a list of acronyms,abbreviations,and common terms used throughout the Plan. A list of the documents referenced in the Plan is provided in Chapter 8.Website addresses are provided for documents that were prepared by or for the division. Six appendices are provided with the Plan: • Appendix A is a cost assessment,as required by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission(UTC), • Appendix B includes the six-year capital improvement plan required to be included in the Plan, • Appendix C is the Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement(Amended and Restated ILA), • Appendix D shows assumptions used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) model of greenhouse gas emissions, • Appendix E includes the division's responses to the comments and questions received during the public review period;the full text of each comment is also be available on the division's website, • Appendix F includes detailed descriptions of the disposal alternatives that were analyzed,and • Appendix G includes comment letters from Washington state agencies that are required to review the Draft Plan. 1-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 19 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Review Process State law delegates authority to the county to prepare a comprehensive solid waste management plan in cooperation with the cities within its boundaries.An interlocal agreement is required for any city participating in a joint city-county plan (RCW 70.95.080(3)).This Plan was prepared in cooperation with 37 King County cities with which the county has interlocal agreements(all cities in the county except for Seattle and Milton). This Plan builds upon the 2001 Plan and the Transfer Plan that was approved by the King County Council in December 2007.This Plan presents goals,policies,and actions in the following areas:the existing solid waste system,forecasting and data,sustainable materials management,the transfer and processing system,landfill management and solid waste disposal,and system financing. On January 8,2018,the Draft Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement(EIS),conducted according to the State Environmental Policy Act,were released for a 60-day public comment period.The public comment period ended on March 8,2018.The division received 68 comment letters from 40 individuals,four organizations,five businesses,four agencies,one King County Councilmember and 14 cities. During the comment period,the division also held three open houses and participated in13 stakeholder meetings with varied audiences. In addition,the division employed a variety of communications tools in the public awareness campaign during the 60-day public review and comment period.These included on-line and in-person opportunities to comment,as well as printed materials,a cable TV spot,press releases,and a PowerPoint presentation to support presentations to stakeholders to make people aware of the key topics in the Draft Plan and how they could comment. Key messages were developed early and were used in all awareness efforts.An on-line tool was also used to offer people a way to voice their opinions on the three key issues in the Draft Plan.A total of 487 respondents(486 in English,one in Spanish) participated in the informal on-line questionnaire(KCSWD 2018a). The revised Plan,transmitted to the King County Council in July 2018,considers comments,preliminary review by the Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology),review by the UTC and the Washington State Department of Agriculture,and incorporates the Executive's recommendations.The revised Plan must be adopted by: • The King County Council, • The Regional Policy Committee acting as the Solid Waste Interlocal Forum (SWIF),and • Cities representing three-quarters of the total population of the cities that act on the plan during a 120-day adoption period. After adoption and completion of the Final EIS the County/City-Approved Plan will be submitted to Ecology. The Plan becomes final upon Ecology's approval. Following is the anticipated schedule for completion of the Plan review and adoption process: 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-judy 2018 1-3 Att A Page 20 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Approximate January 8-March 8,2018 Release Draft Plan and Draft EIS for 60-day public Complete review and comment. January 8-May 7,2018 Submit Draft Plan and Draft EIS to Ecology and UTC for Complete up to 120-day review and comment. Revise the Draft Plan and Draft EIS to incorporate May-July 2018 Ecology,UTC,and public comments and the King Complete County Executive's recommendations.Issue Final EIS. Submit the revised Plan to the King County Council July 26,2018 (including the Regional Policy Committee)for Complete adoption. Late 2018/Early 2019 Submit County-approved Plan to the cities for adoption (120-day adoption period). Mid 2019 Submit County/City-approved Plan to Ecology for final approval (45 day period). 1-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2oz8 Att A Page 21 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 aA r' r rri� ' 5w PENN— Aba r t w < wa Are. Q5�. a, w x� I Y The Existing Solid n Syste'.M Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Policies /ES-1 Maintain a public and private mix of solid waste transfer and processing facilities. ES-2 Work with the division's advisory committees,the cities,and the Solid Waste Interlocal Forum on solid waste management planning and decisions. ES-3 Incorporate principles of equity and social justice into solid waste system planning. ES-4 Consider climate change impacts and sustainability when planning for facilities,operations,and programs. Att A Page 24 lllio� Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Le Existing Solid Waste System The solid waste management system has evolved from a relatively basic system of garbage collection and disposal to a much more complex network of collection,sorting,salvage,reuse,recycling,composting,and disposal managed by the county,area cities,and private-sector collection and processing companies. Initial improvements to solid waste facilities and operations have been developed further to incorporate waste prevention and recycling programs that strive to balance resource use and conservation with production and consumption. One of the early influences in the evolution of the system was the sweeping environmental legislation of the 1960s and 1970s,beginning in 1965 with the federal Solid Waste Management Act,which established strict regulatory standards for landfills and other solid waste facilities. Washington State subsequently passed its own waste management act,codified in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70.95,and established Sign at Bow Lake Transfer Station encourages customers to Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste recycle more Handling in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-304. In 1976,the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act set even more stringent standards for environmental protection,including requirements for the use of impermeable bottom liners and daily cover at landfills.In response to the more stringent regulations,the county began closing the unlined community landfills across the region,replacing many of them with the more environmentally protective and geographically dispersed transfer facilities that are still in operation today.With the development of the transfer network(eight transfer stations and two drop boxes)and technological advances at the county-owned Cedar Hills Regional Landfill (Cedar Hills),division facilities and operations were brought into compliance with the new environmental standards,and a safe,efficient,and sustainable system of solid waste management was created.The standards have continued to evolve over time,and transfer facilities and landfills now operate in accordance with the Solid Waste Handling Standards(WAC 173-350)and Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills(WAC 173-351). Thirty-seven of the 39 cities in King County(all but the cities of Seattle and Milton)and the unincorporated areas of King County participate in the solid waste system. In all,the county's service area,shown in Figure 2-1,covers approximately 2,050 square miles. In 2017,there were almost 1.5 million residents and about 771,000 people employed in the service area,disposing over 931,000 tons of garbage at Cedar Hills.Studies show that even more can be done to reduce disposal through waste prevention,reuse,and recycling. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 2-1 Att A Page 25 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Cu Cu i U d ro O Q O m m a t N N m O C O O LL O U Cu N U C N U 01 CuO N .� y Y D U D z L � LD I E L o < m U) , I U) I I I I % I I I � I N i I (� I � I U I •\ I i I N I � I ' � a C: 000 I L i U i o' � sS I 1, EU r I _ o 00 U OUtE i t '0 N LL o E E Q m � m o a U) _ �° Cmo I o w o ri o o Q r r a o � I t'o o Q o E m ie I Y �a U — Q m w I o o LL N. y Q U Y Lo N N ) .O O N C L w ` cn ) m a o o a Z LL a m m w w C C o o w U � 4 m w Y 2-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 Att A Page 26 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 The Solid Waste System Figure 2-2 provides a general overview of the collection,transfer,transportation,processing,and disposal systems for garbage,recyclables,organics,and construction and demolition debris.Garbage is transported to Cedar Hills for disposal,while recyclables,organics,and most construction and demolition materials are taken directly to processing or compost facilities where materials are prepared for sale to manufacturers and other users.As shown,these recycled or composted products eventually return to the market for consumer purchase. As can be seen in Figure 2-2,this multi-faceted system uses the combined resources of the public and private sectors. Regulations and systems for collection,transfer,transport,processing,and disposal that come into play are complex, involving state,county,city,and private-sector responsibilities. Collection of Solid Waste and Recyclables In accordance with state law RCW 81.77.020 and 36.58.040,counties are prohibited from providing curbside garbage collection services. Legal authority for regulating collection is shared primarily between the state-acting through the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC)-and the cities.The UTC sets and adjusts rates and requires compliance with the state and local adopted solid waste management plans and related ordinances. RCW 81.77 also includes a process for allowing cities to opt out of the UTC regulatory structure and either contract directly for solid waste collection or provide city-operated collection systems. The county's 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(2001 Plan) v� specifies that recycling should be included as part of the basic garbage rate for residents in most of King County. King County enacted a service-level ordinance(King County Code(KCC) 10.18)that includes this requirement r - for unincorporated areas,except Vashon Island,Skykomish,and Snoqualmie Pass.The UTC then required collection companies to develop tariffs that spread the cost and availability of recycling to all residential garbage customers.These tariffs and service-level requirements also apply to cities that have not opted out of the UTC regulatory structure. Most of the garbage,recyclables,and organics collection in the county's service area are provided by four private-sector companies- Recology CleanScapes, Inc., Republic Services, Inc.(formerly Allied Waste, Inc.), Waste Connections, Inc.,and Waste Management, Inc. Except for Recology CleanScapes,which only provides contracted services,these companies " operate both through the UTC and service contracts with individual cities. Most of the 37 cities in the service area contract directly with one or more Most of the garbage,recyclables,and of these private companies for collection services. Eight cities(Beaux Arts, organics collection is provided by Black Diamond,Covington, Hunts Point, Kenmore,Medina,Woodinville, the private sector(Photo courtesy of and Yarrow Point)and all of the unincorporated areas receive collection Recology CleanScapes) services from these private companies operating under certificates issued by the UTC.Two cities-Enumclaw and Skykomish-provide municipal collection services within their own jurisdictions. Enumclaw collects garbage,recyclables,and organics;Skykomish collects only garbage. There is a fundamental difference in how the UTC regulates residential and non-residential collection of recyclable materials.The Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 prohibits regulation of price,route,or service 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 2-3 Att A Page 27 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 2-2.The Solid Waste System Garbage ■ Recyclables ■Construction & Demolition Debris Organics (C&D) 000 000 ©EM a o 0 0 Homes&Apartments Businesses Construction Sites Stores King County Small Scale Transfer Statio Organics Processing .0011,11 04 Private Composting Facility Manufacturer of New Products Cedar Hills Bio Energy WA Regional Landfill Private Construction&Demolition Materials Processing Facility Private Global,Regional& Transfer Station Local Markets heti4 Private Landfill Private Materials Recovery Facilities &Recyclables Facilities 2-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 Att A Page 28 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 of any motor carrier transporting property.While this provision does not apply to collection of garbage and recyclable materials from residents,recyclable materials generated by the non-residential sector are considered to be property and are subject to a different regulatory structure.King County cannot enact ordinances that require commercial garbage collectors to include recyclables collection as part of the non-residential collection service.Cities,on the other hand,may include recyclables collection as part of their non-residential collection service,but cannot prohibit businesses and other non-residential entities from choosing other vendors for this service. Revenue Sharing Provides Incentive for Collection Companies to Enhance Recycling In 2010,the state legislature amended statute RCW 81.77.185,allowing solid waste collection companies regulated by the UTC to retain up to 50 percent of the revenue paid to them for the recycled materials they collect from households (the statute does not apply to collection in cities with contracts for recyclables collection).The purpose of the statute is to provide collection companies with a financial incentive to enhance their recycling programs.Formerly,all revenues from the sale of residential recyclables were passed back to the households as a credit on their garbage bills. To qualify for the revenue sharing,collection companies must submit a plan to the UTC that has been certified by King County as consistent with the current Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan.The Solid Waste Division Director has authority to make this certification. To qualify for certification,the collection company's plan must: • Be submitted annually for approval, • Demonstrate how proposed program enhancements will be effective in increasing the quantity and quality of materials collected, • Demonstrate consistency with the minimum collection standards, • Incorporate input from the Solid Waste Division,and • Be submitted to the Solid Waste Division with sufficient time to review prior to UTC deadlines. Since January 2013,all UTC-regulated areas of King County,except Vashon Island,have certified revenue sharing agreements in place. Curbside Collection in Rural Areas When curbside recycling was initiated in King County in the early 1990s,the collection companies (operating under UTC certificates) serving unincorporated areas were required to provide curbside recycling services as specified in KCC 10.18 for most of the county.These requirements,consistent with the 1989 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan,stated that curbside recycling would be offered to all households as part of the basic garbage service and that yard waste service would be available to all households as a subscription service. However,some rural areas were exempted from these requirements because their low population density or lack of participation in garbage collection services suggested that curbside recycling might not be cost effective. Currently,three unincorporated areas are not included in the county's collection service-level standards as specified in KCC 10.18: 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 2-5 Att A Page 29 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Vashon/Maury Island- Historically,a comparatively high percentage of Vashon/Maury Island residents have chosen to self-haul garbage and recyclables to the division's Vashon Recycling and Transfer Station;however,the number of households subscribing to garbage service has increased over time.Waste Connections, Inc.,the company providing garbage collection service on Vashon/Maury Island,also offers subscriptions to recyclables collection services.From a survey of Island residents(KCSWD 2016c),about 17 percent currently subscribe to curbside recycling services. Organics curbside collection is not available. Skykomish Area-The area around Skykomish is remote and sparsely populated. Residents of Skykomish and some residents in surrounding unincorporated areas receive curbside garbage collection service from the Town of Skykomish.Skykomish does not collect curbside recyclables or organics.Customers may self-haul garbage and recyclables to the division's drop box facility located in Skykomish;however,separate organics collection is not provided at the facility. Snoqualmie Pass-The Snoqualmie Pass area is also very sparsely populated. Residential garbage collection is available from Waste Management, Inc.of Ellensburg in Kittitas County.Curbside recycling is not available;however; the division does provide a site with collection bins for the standard curbside recyclable materials.Organics collection is not available. Transfer The division operates eight transfer stations and two rural drop boxes in the urban and rural areas of the county (Figure 2-3). In addition to meeting standards for the safe and environmentally sound transfer of solid waste,the transfer network reduces the amount of truck traffic on the highways by providing geographically dispersed stations where garbage collected throughout the region can be consolidated into fewer loads for transport to the landfill. Transfer facilities are the public face of the solid waste system. In 2017,county transfer facilities received about 917,650 tons of garbage and recyclables,through more than 952,360 customer visits. Garbage and,at most facilities,recyclable materials from business and residential self-haulers are accepted at the transfer station and drop box facilities.The transfer stations also provide accessible drop-off locations for garbage picked up at the curb by the commercial collection companies. From these geographically dispersed transfer stations,garbage is consolidated in transfer trailers and taken to the county-owned Cedar Hills Regional Landfill in the Maple Valley area. Recyclable materials are transported to processing facilities throughout the region. I" Public Health-Seattle&King ,. County(Public Health) is the primary regulatory and enforcement agency responsible for issuing operating permits for both public and private solid waste handling facilities.This includes solid waste,recycling,and m composting facilities. Solid waste Entrance of Algona Transfer Station 2-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o18 Att A Page 30 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 2-3. Map of transfer station locations Bothell ---------------------- --------------------------------- -- ---------------- -- Lake Forest Shoreline park Woodinville r Skykomish u S en r J,Duvaff Seattle Kirkl nd 0 f� Redmond Yarrow Poin n 520 Hunts P CZ a�, Clyd H II n a Medin Bellevue ea A Sammamish erc Factoria I Ian c Newcastle Issaquah Sno ie i 1 orlh end urien Tu it Ren Cedar Hills Regional Landfill / Renton 169 SeaTac NoCedar Falls Vashon ar Lake 18 Vashon Island Des 06 Moi Kent vington Maple Valley 0 167 f� _ f v Auburn Federal way Blac D11 mo d o Algona _Milton Pacific U J 169 u G Enumcaw King County solid waste facilities C�dW Landfill �y Transfer Station Drop Box ® King County Boundary 0 2 4 S _ Q Cities Miles Unincorporated Area a , omo�a , omo�a p„m.a 1-7 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 2-7 Att A Page 31 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 handling regulations are codified in the Code of the King County Board of Health,Title 10.The permitting process is the vehicle by which Public Health enforces the state's Solid Waste Handling Standards(WAC 173-350) and Criteria for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills(WAC 173-351).Public Health inspects solid waste handling facilities and has the authority to take corrective action for noncompliance. Processing of Commingled Recyclables While garbage picked up at the curb goes to the county's solid waste system,the collection companies take the recyclable materials picked up at the curb to their own facilities for processing.The processing of recyclable materials into new commodities begins at a materials recovery facility.Materials recovery facilities receive material loads from collection trucks,remove contaminants from the loads,sort materials to meet the specifications of the end users or markets,and compact or bale the material for efficient shipping.As the residential collection system has moved to commingled collection,materials recovery facilities in the region have upgraded their facilities to improve their ability to remove contaminants and sort materials into marketable commodity grades.Any residuals,or non-recyclable waste products,from materials recovery facilities within the King County service area must be disposed of at a King County solid waste facility. ®.: 4M The processing of recyclables throughout the Pacific .w Northwest is currently handled through the private sector.Companies that � collect recyclables curbside are required by contract or ordinance to deliver them to recycling facilities. Local facilities receive recyclable materials from the region as well as from other areas of the United States.These Recology CleanScapes materials recovery facility private-sector facilities have made necessary upgrades over time to expand processing capacity to meet demand.The three largest collection companies in King County- Recology CleanScapes Inc., Republic Services, Inc.,and Waste Management Inc.,each own a materials recovery facility located within the county,shown in Figure 2-4,to process most of the recyclable materials they collect. Recology CleanScapes'materials recovery facility in south Seattle opened in 2014. Republic's 3rd and Lander Recycling Center in south Seattle was substantially redesigned in 2007 to improve its ability to sort commingled materials and in 2008 was upgraded to expand capacity. Waste Management's Cascade Recycling Center in Woodinville opened in 2002 and was recently upgraded with a new sort line.Curbside recyclables collected on Vashon Island are processed at Waste Management JMK Fibers'Port of Tacoma facility,which was upgraded substantially in 2013.Table 2-1 shows the address for each facility as well as how many tons were processed in 2017. 2-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2oz8 Att A Page 32 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 2-4. Locations of composting, materials recovery, and designated construction and demolition recycling and disposal facilities Snohomish County 522 �J United Recycling-Snohomish Lenz Enterprises 1= Maltby Container and Recycling 530 DTG Maltby TG Woodinville Cascade Recycling Center op Cedar Grove 99 520' v __ a In hird&Lander Recycling Center&Transfer Station ited Recyclin�- eat le �J a Recology Cleans a Y C6 qt Transfer/ RecyclingC t r,! - Recycling Sta' ' ^� i 1=Black River Recycling&Transfer Station 169 DTG Renton Cedar Grove � I IY ' Locations of composting, materials � — 767 recovery, and designated construction �r Regycling Northw2st and demolition recycling and disposal facilities a Compost Facility JMK Fibers \ Q Materials Recovery Facility Recovery 1 i�.■ ' y� Recyclable Construction and Demolition Waste Non-Recyclable Construction and Demolition Waste --- King County Boundary Cities 512 Unincorporated Area I pine ecycling o 1 2 4 w=F OMiles V v�w,v,e,oi��swowo�re,v,a�svau,s_�v��,wvwv�oeman _�v��„a m,a snvm,a 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 2-9 Att A Page 33 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 2-1. Materials recovery facilities locations and tons processed in 2017 Materials Recovery Facility Address Tons from Total Tons King County Processed Recology CleanScapes,Inc. 7303 8th Avenue S.,Seattle 73,121 92,038 Republic Services 3rd and Lander Recycling Center 2722 3rd Avenue S.,Seattle Data not broken out byjurisdiction 223,722 Waste Management JMK Fibers 1440 Port of Tacoma Road, 55,144 167,394 Tacoma Waste Management Cascade Recycling Center 14020 NE 190th,Woodinville 64,295 j 116,234 Facilities that process mixed recyclables in King County are subject to regulation by Public Health under the Code of the King County Board of Health Title 10.12,which adopts the standards of WAC 173-350. Disposa Solid waste generated in King County's service area is disposed at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill—the only active landfill in the county.Located on a 920-acre site in the Maple Valley area,Cedar Hills has provided safe and efficient disposal of the county's solid waste since 1965.In 2017,the landfill received over 931,000 tons of municipal solid waste. Cedar Hills was originally permitted in 1960,at a time when there were few regulations in place to govern the '`M design and operation of landfills.Since then,environmental regulations have become increasingly rigorous,requiring the placement of an impermeable,high-density polyethylene liner and clay barrier at the bottom of the landfill,daily cover(using soil or other approved materials) , over the waste,and frequent environmental monitoring, •` - . among other requirements. 4 WT Over time,Cedar Hills has been developed in sequential ,_,. stages(or refuse areas) in accordance with the most * ` current Site Development Plan.The division has invested considerable effort and resources to upgrade older areas of the landfill,while designing and operating new areas to meet or exceed regulatory requirements. Figure 2-5 shows the layout of the landfill,including the boundaries of the past and active refuse areas as currently permitted. As shown,Area 7 is the currently active refuse area,and is expected to operate through 2018 or early 2019.At that time,operations will transition to the newest refuse area, A bulldozer compacts waste at the Cedar Hills landfill Area 8. The landfill is bordered to the east by Passage Point,a transitional housing development,residentially zoned property on the east,north,and west, and by property to the south that is zoned for mining,other resource extraction, and similar uses.State regulation WAC 173-351-140(3)(b) requires a 250-foot buffer between the active area and residentially zoned property,and a 100-foot buffer between the active area and non-residentially zoned property. 2-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 34 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 2-5. Current layout of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill ipI k 99 AREA 4 ie,5, f .; 1991 -1999 CEN RAL Pi N AREA 5 � 1986- 988 x 1999-2005 e M f. a y" 2 . AREA 7 AREA 6 - s� + (Active) 2005-2010 r 4 2010- F UTURE AREA 8 SOUTHEAST ;. AREA ., } - M _ _ �a..• " yrr..� w��a a{xr,�s��wi"r .7c�a•�. �-oe r -"'-r-. .�:��". _ 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 � Att A Page 35 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 However,a special permit,approved by the King County Board of Commissioners in 1960,specified that a 1,000-foot buffer be established around the landfill.In the 1960s,landfilling inadvertently extended about 400 feet into a portion of the southeast buffer,but environmental regulations continue to be met in that area and opportunities to restore the buffer are being pursued.Active use of this buffer zone is currently limited to site access and other approved uses not directly related to land-filling operations,such as environmental monitoring and activities at Passage Point. The landfill has received national recognition for its operations and environmental control systems,which meet or exceed the highest federal,state,and local standards for protection of public health and the environment.This complex network of environmental controls includes a collection of pipes,culverts,holding ponds,and other equipment to manage water and landfill gas,as described in more detail below. Water at the landfill is separated into two categories for treatment.These are: 1)clean stormwater,and 2) contaminated stormwater,which includes leachate and other water that has potentially come into contact with garbage.Leachate is produced when water percolates through the garbage;it is collected in pipes within the landfill and diverted to lined on-site ponds. In the ponds,the leachate is aerated as a preliminary treatment before being sent to the King County South Wastewater Treatment Plant in Renton.The bottom liner and clay barrier beneath the landfill prevent leachate from seeping into the soil or groundwater.Stormwater that runs off the surface of active landfill areas is also potentially contaminated. It is collected in lined ponds before moving on to the treatment system.Clean stormwater is diverted to detention or siltation ponds to control flow and remove sediment,and is then discharged to surface water off-site. Landfill gas is generated through the decomposition of waste buried in the landfill.The gas consists of about 50 percent to 60 percent methane,with the remainder made up of carbon dioxide and trace amounts of oxygen, nitrogen,and other gases.Landfill gas from Cedar Hills is collected by using motor blowers to create a vacuum in Figure 2-6. Landfill gas-to-energy process Cedar Hills Regional Landfill BF Public Landfill Gas Renewable Energy 2,660 tolls of trash come into The BEW plant,in operation since Selling biogas produced by the BEW the landfill on average each day.The October 2010,processes the landfill gas plant generates$1-$7 million decomposing organic material forms into pipeline-quality biogas and electric annually,depending on production rates carbon dioxide and methane gases.In power.Along with generating and market prices,helping to keep solid 2017,the landfill generated about 10,000 approximately 15.4 million waste disposal rates low.The renewable cubic feet per minute of gas. therms of Clean renewable natural gas produced by the plant each The gas control system minimizes gas natural gas each year,BEW year equals the amount of energy emissions escaping through the ground generates over 15 million kilowatt hours needed to meet the natural gas needs of or through the air.The gas is captured of electricity from landfill gas each year over 19,000 homes in King County orto through a network of pipes and sent to to help offset the facility's electricity use. substitute for the energy use of the Bio Energy Washington(BEW) Residual impurities are destroyed by the 11.2 million gallons of diesel fuel. gas-to-energy plant on site. plant's thermal oxidizer. The gas collected from the landfill is sent to the Bio Energy Washington plant to be processed into pipeline quality gas 2-12 2019 Comprehensibe Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 Att A Page 36 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 perforated pipes within the solid waste.The gas used to be routed to high-temperature flares,where it was burned to safely destroy any harmful emissions. In a public/private partnership, Bio Energy Washington,began operating a landfill gas-to-energy facility at the landfill in 2010.The facility runs landfill gas through a series of processors that remove and destroy harmful components and convert the methane portion of the gas into pipeline-quality natural gas.The clean gas is routed through a nearby gas line into the Puget Sound Energy grid and is also used to power the facility(Figure 2-6).The division is also exploring other uses for the gas,such as producing compressed natural gas for operating vehicles.The flare system is kept in standby mode;during maintenance of the energy facility or in the event of an emergency,the flare system can be activated to manage the gas.Air emissions from the flare system are tested regularly and have consistently met or exceeded all applicable environmental regulations. Solid Waste System Planning In addition to regulating solid waste handling and disposal,state law also established a framework for planning, authorizing counties to prepare coordinated Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plans in cooperation with the cities within their borders.While cities can choose to prepare their own plans,all of the incorporated cities within King County,except for Seattle and Milton,have chosen to participate in the development of this single,coordinated regional plan for the incorporated and unincorporated areas of King County.Since July, 1988,cities have entered into interlocal agreements(ILAs)with the county that establish the Solid Waste Division as the lead planning agency. By the time the first Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan was adopted by the Metropolitan King County Council in 1990,there were 29 incorporated cities participating in this coordinated effort.Since then,eight new cities have incorporated and joined the King County system-for a total of 37 cities. To make sound planning decisions,it is important to understand how the solid waste system operates today and to identify changes that might affect it in the future.This information is critical to ensuring that plans for facilities, services,and programs meet the needs of the region in the years to come. Because the system is a combination of public and private entities,working with stakeholders in the early stages of system planning is essential. In addition to working with local jurisdictions and the private-sector collection companies,the division works closely with its two advisory committees-the Solid Waste Advisory Committee(SWAC)and the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee(MSWMAC). For the preparation of this Plan,the division collaborated with the advisory committees through a process of presentations and discussions. The next section identifies the participants in the planning process and describes the stakeholder process that guided the development of this plan.Also included is a brief description of the state,county,and city responsibilities in planning the solid waste system. A Regional Approach As partners in a regional system,cities share in the costs and benefits of King County's transfer and disposal system. The regional solid waste system was formally established in King County when the county and cities entered into the original Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement of 1988. In 2013,the county worked with the cities to amend the original ILA.The Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement(Amended and Restated ILA)extends the original ILA by 12.5 years,from June 2028 through December 2040(the full text of the ILA can be found in Appendix Q.The longer term will keep rates lower by allowing for longer-term bonding for capital projects.All 37 cities have signed the Amended and Restated ILA.Cities in the regional system are on the following page: 2019 ComprebenszveSolzd Waste 2wanagementPlan-ju1y2028 2-13 Att A Page 37 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Algona Des Moines Maple Valley Sea Tac Auburn Duvall Medina Shoreline Beaux Arts Enumclaw Mercer Island Skykomish Bellevue Federal Way Newcastle Snoqualmie Black Diamond Hunts Point Normandy Park Tukwila Bothell Issaquah North Bend Woodinville Burien Kenmore Pacific Yarrow Point Carnation Kent Redmond Clyde Hill Kirkland Renton Covington Lake Forest Park Sammamish The Amended and Restated ILA includes several enhancements to the original ILA,including provisions for insurance and a potential reserve for environmental liabilities.Other changes include: • Commitment to the continued involvement of the cities advisory group(to be renamed the Metropolitan Solid Waste Advisory Committee or MSWAC), • An expanded role for cities in system planning,including planning for long-term disposal alternatives and in establishing financial policies, • A dispute resolution process,which includes non-binding mediation,and • Mitigation provisions for host cities and neighboring cities. Issues specific to individual jurisdictions,such as the city of Bothell annexing areas in Snohomish County,may require an amendment to the ILA that addresses that particular concern. Both the original and the new ILA assign responsibility for different aspects of solid waste management to the county and the cities.The county is assigned operating authority for transfer and disposal services,is tasked with providing support and assistance to the cities for the establishment of waste prevention and recycling programs,and is the planning authority for solid waste. Each city is designated the authority for collection services within its corporate boundaries and agrees to direct solid waste generated and/or collected within those boundaries to the King County transfer and disposal system. Cooperation between the county and the 37 cities in a regional system of solid waste management has allowed the division to achieve economies of scale that translate into lower fees for system ratepayers.A significant benefit is the savings realized by being able to extend the life of the in-county landfill for solid waste disposal as a result of improved recycling rates.Economies of scale will continue to be beneficial once the Cedar Hills landfill reaches capacity and closes,and the region transitions to a new method of solid waste disposal.The benefits also extend to the network of recycling and transfer stations that provide convenient,geographically dispersed transfer points around the county.A regional system can operate with fewer transfer facilities than an aggregation of separate, smaller systems.The regional system also allows use of individual stations to be balanced to reduce over-or under- use of any one station.Examples of ways the division may influence station use are: 1) reader boards located at each transfer station that show what the wait times are at the two nearest stations and 2)the online information available for each station showing a picture of the inbound queue and the average disposal time after weigh-in at each station. 2-14 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 38 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Regional Authorities and Roles As defined in RCW 70.95.030,solid waste handling includes management,storage,collection,transportation, treatment,utilization,processing,and final disposal.Responsibility for solid waste handling in Washington is divided among the state,counties,jurisdictional health departments,and the cities,as delineated in various legislation, regulations,and agreements.Table 2-2 lists the responsibilities for each entity,its role,and the guiding legislation. As shown in the table,the state establishes authorities,minimum standards,and planning requirements,and delegates responsibility for implementation to the counties and cities. Table 2-2. Roles in regional planning and administration Guiding Legislation, Entity Role Regulation,or Agreement Establish solid waste regulations for management,storage, collection,transportation,treatment,utilization,processing, Revised Code of Washington(RCW)70.95 and final disposal. Washington State Delegate authority to the counties to preparejoint Department of Ecology comprehensive solid waste management plans with the cities RCW 70.95 in their boundaries,and review and approve those plans. Set Minimum Functional Standards for implementing solid Washington Administrative Code(WAC) waste laws and establishing planning authorities and roles. 173-304,173-350,and 173-351 Review the cost assessment prepared with the Comprehensive RCW 70.95.096 Washington Utilities Solid Waste Management Plan. and Transportation Regulate solid waste collection services and rates in Commission unincorporated areas and in cities that choose not to contract RCW 81.77 for solid waste collection services. Washington State Review the preliminary draft plan for compliance with RCW Department RCW 70.95.095 and RCW 17.24 of Agriculture 17.24 and the rules adopted under that chapter. Permit solid waste handling facilities,including permit Code of the King County Board of Health, issuance,renewal,and,if necessary,suspension(handling Title 10 Public Health-Seattle facilities include landfills,transfer stations,and drop boxes). &King County(as Make and enforce rules and regulations regarding methods authorized by the Code of the King County Board of Health, King County Board of of waste storage,collection,and disposal to implement the Title 10 Health) state's Minimum Functional Standards. Code of the King County Board of Health, Perform routine facility inspections. Title 10 2019 Compre&25Z)e Solzd Waste 2wanagementPlan-ju1y 2028 2-15 Att A Page 39 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Guiding Legislation, Entity Role Regulation,or Agreement Puget Sound Clean Air Issues air operating permits and enforces permit compliance. RCW 70.94,WAC 173-401 and PSCAA Agency Regulation 1,Article 7 The Regional Policy Committee convenes as the SWIF to advise the King County Council,King County Executive,and other Solid Waste Interlocal jurisdictions,as appropriate,on all policy aspects of solid waste King County Code(KCC)10.24.020C,and Forum(SWIF) managementand planning,and to review and comment on Interlocal Agreements alternatives and recommendations for the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan and other planning documents. Provide transfer and disposal services for unincorporated King County and the 37 cities with Interlocal Agreements.Lead the Interlocal Agreements development of waste prevention and recycling programs. Prepare the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan and RCW 70.95.080,KCCTitle 10,and associated cost assessment. Interlocal Agreements Establish disposal fees at the landfill,transfer stations,and drop boxes to generate necessary revenue to cover solid waste management costs,including: •Facility operation, •Capital improvements, RCW 36.58.040,KCCTitle 10,and -Waste prevention and recycling programs, Interlocal Agreements King County Solid •Grants to cities for recycling programs and special Waste Division collection events, •Self-haul and rural service,and •Administration and overhead. Establish level of service and hours of operation for all King KCC Title 10.10 County transfer and disposal facilities. Amend hours at transfer facilities,as necessary. KCC 10.10.020 and 10.10.025 Designate minimum service levels for recyclables collection in RCW 70.95.092,KCCTitle 10.18 urban and rural areas. Review impacts of the Comprehensive Solid Waste RCW 70.95 Management Plan on solid waste and recycling rates. Participate in the planning process and jointly implement the RCW 70.95.080 and Interlocal Cities Plan with the county,provide collection services and waste Agreements prevention and recycling programs. 2-16 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 40 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Guiding Legislation, Entity Role Regulation,or Agreement Advise the county in the development of solid waste programs and policies,provide feedback on proposed council actions Solid Waste Advisory Committee involving solid waste issues,and comment on proposed solid RCW 70.95.165 and KCC 10.28 waste management policies,ordinances,and plans prior to adoption. Advise the Executive,SWIF,and County Council in all matters Metropolitan Solid related to solid waste management and participate in the Waste Management development of the solid waste management system and KCC 10.25.110 and Interlocal Agreements Advisory Committee waste management plan. Stakeholder Involvement in the Planning Process In the development of the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan,the division sought participation and input from many sources,including the cities,the division's advisory committees,the Community Service Areas(unincorporated area community councils),commercial collection companies,the County Council,division employees,labor unions,and the public. In 2004,the Metropolitan King County Council adopted Ordinance 14971 to establish a process for the 37 cities in the county's service area to collaborate with the division in the early stages of long-term planning and policy development.It set the stage for creation of MSWMAC,which consists of elected officials and staff from participating cities. MSWMAC and the long-standing —p SWAC,mandated by RCW 70.95.165, have been instrumental in the a development of policies,goals,and recommendations presented in this Plan.SWAC has been an advisory group to the division since 1985,with a membership that is geographically _ balanced and includes King County residents and representatives from - . . public interest groups,labor unions, recycling businesses,the marketing sector,agriculture,manufacturing,the --=' waste management industry,and local elected officials. Both SWAC and MSWMAC have been working with the division to create the Ajoint meeting of the MSWMAC and SWAC committees 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 2-17 Att A Page 41 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 building blocks that form the basis for this Plan.Collaborative efforts that have helped shape the Plan include: • Establishing progressive goals for waste prevention and recycling that will further reduce solid waste disposal, • Conducting in-depth analyses and evaluations of the solid waste transfer system that resulted in the development and adoption of a major renovation and replacement plan for the transfer system network, • Conducting subsequent in-depth reviews of the renovation and replacement plan for the transfer network,and • Evaluating strategies for extending the life of Cedar Hills and beginning to explore viable options for waste disposal once the landfill closes. For the current planning cycle,the division met with SWAC and MSWMAC regularly to discuss their issues and concerns,and hear their perspectives on system planning.The contributions of these committees have been instrumental in developing the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan.The division's SWAC and MSWMAC websites contain background on the committees as well as minutes from their meetings with the division (http://www.kingcounty.govldeptsldnrp/solid-waste/about/advisory-committees.aspx). Trends in Solid Waste Management Leading the Way in Waste Prevention, Recycling and Product Stewardship King County continues to gain distinction as a leader in waste prevention and recycling.Together,the division and the cities work with collection and processing companies and local,state,and national businesses and organizations to develop the innovative programs and services that give the county its leading edge.Some key program developments include: • The addition of acceptable recyclable materials for collection at the curb and at division transfer stations, • Growing markets for a wider array of materials for recycling and reuse, • Successful promotions that encourage waste prevention, • An increase in product stewardship,including optimizing/reducing product packaging and shipping materials, whereby manufacturers and retailers are assuming responsibility for recycling their products through take-back programs at selected collection sites across the region, • Advances in the green building industry,including a focus on creating sustainable housing in affordable communities,and • An increase in the number of organizations that accept materials for reuse,such as clothing and textiles,edible food,and reusable building materials. With this Plan,the division and its advisory committees set goals to reduce,reuse,and recycle by focusing on specific waste generators and particular materials or products that remain prevalent in the waste stream.The division is also moving toward a sustainable materials management approach as a way to strengthen the economy while reducing the climate effects of materials and harm to the environment.This approach emphasizes the importance of looking at the full life cycle of materials:design and manufacture,use,and end-of-life.Sustainable materials management is being promoted by both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington State Department of Ecology and is discussed in more depth in Chapter 4. 2-18 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 42 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Washington's legislated system for managing unwanted electronic products and mercury-containing light bulbs and tubes illustrates the successes that can be achieved when manufacturers,retailers,local governments,and nonprofit organizations work together on a major initiative.State legislation was passed in 2006 that requires manufacturers of computers,monitors,and televisions-referred to as e-waste-to provide for the recycling of these products beginning in January 2009.As a member of the Northwest Product Stewardship Council,the division helped draft the model legislation that led to formation of the E-Cycle Washington program,which implements this recycling service at no cost for Washington residents,small businesses,small governments,nonprofit organizations,and school districts.The division assisted businesses throughout the county to become authorized e-waste collection sites. Approximately 175,000 tons of e-waste have been collected since the program's inception. Likewise,the LightRecycle WA program,which recycles mercury-containing lights,went into effect in 2015. Expanding the Collection of Recyclable and Degradable Materials A change in the collection of curbside recyclables has been the transition to commingled (or single-stream) collection.With this system,all recyclables can be placed in a single,wheeled cart rather than the smaller,separate bins often used in the past.The single cart system not only makes recycling easier and more convenient for the customer,it is more efficient for the companies that provide collection service. In addition,the division and cities have worked with the commercial collection companies to implement curbside collection of food scraps and food-soiled paper in the yard waste(organics)container.About 99 percent of single- family customers with curbside garbage collection have access to organics(yard waste and food scraps) collection service.Only Vashon Island and the Skykomish and Snoqualmie Pass areas,which house less than one percent of the county's residents,do not have this service.Studies estimate that over 50 percent of those who set out organics carts recycle some of their food scraps.The combined food scraps and yard waste are taken to processing facilities that turn the materials into nutrient-rich compost used to enrich soils. Building a New Generation of Transfer Stations Since the approval by the King County Council in 2007 of the Solid Waste Transfer _ and Waste Management Plan(Transfer Plan), the division has been moving forward on the renovation and replacement of the -- -- division's urban transfer stations to update technology,incorporate green building features,increase recycling services,and achieve operational efficiencies.New recycling and transfer stations include a flat tipping floor,areas for the collection of a wide array of recyclables,design features that reduce water and energy use,and solid waste compactors. By compacting garbage prior to transport for disposal,up to 30 percent fewer truck trips are required to Solar panels on the south roof of the Shoreline Recycling and Transfer haul the same amount of garbage. Station,one of the many green features of the building 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 2-19 Att A Page 43 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 In 2008,the division opened the first of five new state-of-the-art transfer stations-the Shoreline Recycling and Transfer Station.The station has exceeded all expectations for environmental excellence with its innovative design and green building features. It received the highest possible honor from the U.S.Green Building Council with a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design TI(LEED°) Platinum certification.The station has also been the recipient of 15 recognition awards from national,regional,and local organizations,including the Solid Waste Association of North America,the American Institute of Architects,the American Public Works Association,and the Northwest Construction Consumer Council. Public involvement was a crucial component of the successful design and construction of the Shoreline station. Throughout the process,the division worked closely with the City of Shoreline,neighboring communities, environmental groups,and local businesses and citizens to obtain their input on the project. The facility design and public process for the Shoreline station have set the bar high for the other recycling and transfer stations approved for construction during this planning period,reflecting: • How to approach the planning process-incorporating early community involvement, • How to build them-using the greenest elements possible,and • How to operate them-pursuing operational efficiencies that reduce fuel,energy,and water use;and increasing recycling opportunities. Following the success of the Shoreline Recycling and Transfer Station,construction began on the new Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station.The design of the new Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station builds upon the environmental achievements of Shoreline,with compactors for improved efficiency,water re-use,energy efficient lighting,and solar panels.Providing capacity for about one third of the system's garbage,Bow Lake also offers expanded recycling opportunities.The new recycling and transfer station was completed in 2013 and also earned a Platinum LEED°certification,as well as other awards of excellence. The most recent station to be completed,the Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station-opened in late 2017.This same year,a site was selected for the South County Recycling and Transfer Station (SCRTS)after completion of a Final Environmental Impact Statement. The selected site is just north of • the existing station. Design and construction of the station will take place over the next several years, with an anticipated station opening in 2022. All new recycling and transfer - r' stations will meet green building, safety and environmental standards,- accommodate tandards;accommodate projected growth in the region;incorporate best practices in transfer and transport operations;and offer a wide variety of recycling opportunities for residential and business customers. The new Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station opened in late 2017 2-20 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 Att A Page 44 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Managing Solid Waste Disposal with an Eye to the Future Cedar Hills is the only landfill still operating in King County.Because use of the county landfill is currently the most economical method for disposal of the region's wastes,the division has been extending its useful life.This strategy, recommended in the Transfer Plan,was approved by the County Council in 2007. In December 2010,the County Council approved a Project Program Plan enabling the division to move forward with further development of Cedar Hills.As approved in the Project Program Plan,a disposal area covering approximately 56.5 acres is being developed - this will extend the life of the landfill to about 2028 depending on a variety of factors,including tonnage received. The 2001 Plan directed the division to"contract for long-term disposal at an out-of-county landfill once Cedar Hills reaches capacity and closes." With this Plan,the division explored a range of options for future disposal.The Plan's recommendation is to further develop Cedar Hills to maximize disposal capacity.The next disposal method to employ after Cedar Hills reaches capacity is not specifed in this Plan,so that the latest technological advances can be considered. Emerging technologies for converting solid waste to energy or other resources,such as fuels,are in various stages of development and testing in U.S.and international markets.Some of the technologies are capable of processing the entire solid waste stream,while others target specific components,such as plastics or organics. Regardless of which long term disposal option is selected,the transfer system will still be needed to efficiently consolidate loads.The division will continue to monitor emerging technologies and advances in established disposal methods,recycling,and waste prevention.Although the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement requires consultation with cities at least seven years before Cedar Hills closes,evaluation of the next disposal method should begin prior to the next plan update to ensure enough time for method selection,planning,and implementation. Financing the Solid Waste System for the Long Term As the division continues to modernize the transfer system,keeping fees as low and stable as possible is a fundamental objective. While division revenues rely primarily on per-ton fees for garbage disposal,the current priorities are to increase recycling and prevent waste generation. Reductions in tonnage due to waste prevention and recycling have been gradual,and the system has adjusted accordingly.However,further reductions will continue to affect system revenues.The division will continue to identify new revenue sources,such as the sale of landfill gas from the Cedar Hills landfill and greenhouse gas offsets from this and other potential sources,and will explore sustainable financing options.The division will also work with its advisory committees and others to develop and/or revise financial policies, and address rate stabilization and cost containment. Policies,actions and more discussion can be found in Chapter 7, Solid Waste System Finance. Protecting Natural Resources through Environmental Stewardship Environmental stewardship means managing natural resources so they are available for future generations. It also involves taking responsibility-as individuals,employees,business owners,manufacturers,and governments-for the protection of public health and the environment. Building an environmentally sustainable solid waste management system in King County takes a coordinated,region- wide effort.The division,the cities,and the collection and processing companies in the region are making concerted efforts to help make this happen. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 2-21 Att A Page 45 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste prevention and recycling are just two of the ways in which the division and others are working to reduce wastes,conserve resources,and protect the environment.Other innovations and well- r established programs that support environmental FN stewardship include collecting and selling landfill gas to be converted to pipeline quality gas, 0' _Avu� potential new composting and reuse facilities,and The division provides cleanup assistance for illegal dumping providing cleanup assistance for illegal dumping. Additional Planning Considerations Climate Change Climate impacts are considered by the division when planning for future programs,facilities,and operations,in accordance with Washington State's Solid and Hazardous Waste Plan,Moving Washington Beyond Waste and Toxics (Ecology 2015)and the county's Strategic Climate Action Plan (King County 2015b).Climate change is manifest in the long-term trends in average weather patterns,including the frequency,duration,and intensity of wind and snow storms,cold weather and heat waves,and drought and flooding.Climate change is attributed primarily to the emission of greenhouse gases(GHG),including such compounds as carbon dioxide and methane. Planning for climate change means taking into account both how we might reduce our effects on the climate,today and in the future,and how changes in climate might affect our facilities and operations. Against a baseline set in 2007,the Growth Management Planning Council adopted a Countywide Planning Policy that targets a reduction in countywide sources of GHG emissions of 25 percent by 2020,50 percent by 2030,and 80 percent by 2050. King County will be responsible for assessment and reporting. At a regional level,the division and its planning participants continue to strengthen and broaden waste prevention and recycling programs to continually improve our long-term,positive effects on the environment(discussed in detail in Chapter 4,Sustainable Materials Management).The benefits are tangible in terms of reductions in GHG emissions, resource conservation,and energy savings. King County- Cities Climate Collaboration (K4C) King County and thirteen cities—Bellevue,Burien,Issaquah,Kirkland,Mercer Island,Normandy Park,Redmond,Renton,Sammamish,Seattle,Shoreline,Snoqualmie,and Tukwila— are collaborating through the King County-Cities Climate Collaboration (K4C)to coordinate and enhance the effectiveness of local government climate and sustainability action.Through K4C, county and city staff are partnering on:outreach to engage decision makers,other cities,and the general public;coordination of consistent standards,benchmarks,and strategies;sharing solutions; funding;and shared resource opportunities. All King County cities are encouraged to join this effort,which is supporting and enhancing projects and programs in focus areas such as green building,using and producing renewable energy, sustainability outreach and education,and alternative transportation. 2-22 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 Att A Page 46 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Considerations of how division activities and operations might affect climate change involve both positive and negative A ° impacts on GHG emissions. If areas where - GHG emissions can be expected to occur are identified,strategies to mitigate those emissions can be developed,for example: _ '" ? • The division contracts with Bio Energy Washington to turn landfill gas into pipeline-quality natural gas for the energy market. • The division builds facilities(such as the Shoreline, Bow Lake,and Factoria Recycling and Transfer Stations)that are more energy Compactors at the Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station compact trash, efficient to meet LEED°standards.As reducing the number of trips that county transfer trucks make to previously noted,two of the facilities have Cedar Hills earned a Platinum rating. • Garbage compactors,both for solid waste and recyclables,are being installed at all new urban transfer stations, which will decrease truck trips by up to 30 percent,saving fuel and decreasing emissions. • In day-to-day operations,the division looks for ways to reduce resource use and increase the use of environmentally friendly products. Examples of operational practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions include the use of compaction to reduce truck trips,reducing idling time,environmentally preferable purchasing,and exploring the use of compressed natural gas and other low-emitting technologies in trucks and equipment. • The Food:Too Good to Waste program also helps curb the effects of climate change.Uneaten food accounts for 23 percent of all methane emissions-a potent climate change contributor. When food is thrown away,all the water and energy used to produce,package and transport • • that food is also wasted.The program educates people about how to plan and prepare meals to decrease the amount of wasted food. TOO GOOD • The division teamed up with the City of Seattle to produce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in King TO WASTE County(Stockholm Environment Institute 2012),a report that looked at greenhouse gas emissions from several different perspectives including undertaking a consumption-based inventory.The inventory offers a more complete picture of the county's environmental footprint,taking into account emissions associated with the production and consumption of food,goods,and services.The report's research shows that efforts such as reducing food waste or purchasing sustainable and low-impact products can help to create a broader and deeper impact on global greenhouse gas emissions. • The division has planted deciduous and evergreen trees on the Duvall and Puyallup/Kit Corner closed landfills to create a carbon"sink"by capturing carbon dioxide through the process of photosynthesis. The division also looks at the potential impacts of climate change on facilities and operations and determines strategies for adapting to those impacts. For example,the division is using more drought-tolerant plants in facility landscapes and identifying alternate transportation routes to avoid areas where there may be an increase in seasonal flooding. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 2-23 Att A Page 47 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 0 King County - Climate Change Proper solid waste management plays a significant role in reducing GHG emissions.That role is recognized by both state and local governments in Washington.In 2015,the Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology) issued its plan,Moving Washington Beyond Waste and Toxics (Ecology 2015),which presents a long-term strategy for systematically eliminating wastes and the use of toxic substances.The 2015 King County Strategic Climate Action Plan (King County 2015b) synthesizes and focuses King County's most critical goals,objectives,and strategies to reduce GHG emissions and prepare for the effects of climate change.It provides"one-stop-shopping"for county decision-makers, employees,and the general public to learn about the county's most critical climate change actions. As documented in the 2011 King County Sustainability Report(King County 2011),GHG emissions from county operations(for sources other than transit) have stabilized and begun to decline.Building on these successes,achievement of the county's long-term targets is ambitious,but achievable. King County's overarching targets: • Communitywide:King County shall partner with its residents,businesses,local governments,and other partners to reduce countywide GHG emissions at least 80 percent below 2007 levels by 2050. • County operations:King County shall reduce total GHG emissions from government operations, compared to a 2007 baseline,by at least 15 percent 'W by 2015,25 percent by 2020,and 50 percent by 2030. • Department of Natural Resources and Parks Carbon " Neutral Commitment:The Department became a• Carbon Neutral in 2016.Both the Solid Waste Division and the Wastewater Treatment Division must be carbon neutral by 2025. Throughout this Plan,ways to reduce impacts on the climate and adapt to changes that occur are noted. These actions are grouped in three primary strategies: Factoria drought-tolerant plants and permeable Mitigation—directly or indirectly reducing emissions. pavement Examples include reducing energy use at division facilities,reducing fuel use,using hybrid vehicles, distributed composting facilities,using alternative fuels,and promoting waste prevention and recycling to reduce the mining of virgin resources and emissions from manufacturing and processing activities.Another example is the conversion of gas collected at the county's landfill into pipeline- quality natural gas. 2-24 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 48 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Adaptation—modifying facilities and operations to address the effects of climate change.Examples include designing facilities for more severe weather systems(e.g.,roofs designed for greater snow loads),using more drought-tolerant plants in facility landscapes,and identifying alternate transportation routes to avoid areas where there may be an increase in seasonal flooding. Sequestration—removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and depositing it back into natural"sinks,"such as plants and soils.Examples include planting more trees around facilities to . remove carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, using biochar, and using compost to replenish =y depleted soils and promote plant growth. ; Gas collection pipes at the Cedar Hills landfill Equity and Social Justice The division adheres to the King County Equity and Social Justice Strategic Plan 2016-2022(King County 2016b) which emphasizes that King County is committed to ensuring that equity and social justice are considered in the development and implementation of policies,programs,and funding decisions.Equity is achieved when all people have an equal opportunity to attain their full potential.Inequity occurs when there are differences in well-being between and within communities that are systematic,patterned,unfair,and can be changed.These differences are not random;they are caused by our past and current decisions,systems of power and privilege,policies,and the implementation of those policies.Social justice encompasses all aspects of justice,including legal,political,and economic;it demands fair distribution of public goods,institutional resources,and life opportunities. In solid waste system planning,the division examines ways that it may affect equity and social justice through its programs and services. • Fair distribution of transfer facilities,services at the facilities,and division resources,such as the community litter cleanup, school education,and green building programs,helps ensure that everyone has access to services that create safer and healthier communities. • The division provides technical assistance to ensure that the benefits of green building strategies,such as lower energy costs and improved indoor air quality,are available to residents of affordable housing developments. • In siting new transfer facilities,the division engages communities to ensure equal opportunity for involvement in the siting process.The division uses demographic data to ensure that these essential public facilities are distributed equitably throughout the county and that any negative impacts of the facilities do not unfairly burden any community. • In addition to translating materials into multiple languages,the division has added a Spanish-language component to its comprehensive outreach programs. Rather than simply translate existing materials,the division has worked directly with the local Spanish-speaking communities to create new programs and materials in Spanish that respond to the questions and needs of these communities,an approach referred to as transcreation. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 2-25 Att A Page 49 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Green Building and Equity The goal of the county's Equity and Social Justice Ordinance is for all King County residents to live in communities of opportunity.To reach this goal,all communities must be equipped with the means to provide residents with access to a livable wage,affordable housing,quality education,quality health care,and safe and vibrant neighborhoods.Green building can play an important role in providing safe, healthy,and affordable housing,public infrastructure,and commercial facilities,which have historically not been built to the highest green standards. There exists a variety of equity and social justice opportunities on any project including:education,training, apprenticeship,procurement,material selection,contracts,public outreach,public service,community amenities,communication,indoor and outdoor air quality,economic development,job creation,and more. King County's Sustainable Infrastructure Scorecard,the green building rating system used for county- owned projects not qualified for the LEED°certification,contains a Social Equity Credit as an opportunity to address equity and social justice issues.The county's Green Building Team is also working on additional guidance for capital projects to utilize an equity impact review tool,designed to help project teams to evaluate how people and places are impacted by an action,and to take into consideration distributional,process,and cross-generational equity. 2-26 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 50 A IIy' n i L aA P re� r x - M' r Tb Ordinance 18893 upd 1 Forecasti K4W*U a Data DNTMV (# bit, r FOR OFFICIAL US# MY 331 } .,. age 52 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Policies FD-1 Monitor and report the amount,composition,and source of solid waste entering the transfer and disposal system. FD-2 Update the solid waste tonnage forecast to support short-and long-term planning and budgeting for facilities and operations. FD-3 Monitor and report waste prevention and recycling activity, including the amount of materials recycled,programmatic achievements,and the strength of commodity markets. FDA Continue to monitor new and emerging technologies to identify opportunities for their use in managing solid waste and recyclables. Att A Page 53 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of ReCOmmended Actions The following table includes a menu of recommended actions that the county and the cities should implement.Under the responsibility column,the entity listed first has primary responsibility for the action,bold indicates that the entity has responsibility for the action, and a star(*) indicates that the action is a priority. If the responsibility is not in bold,the action has lower implementation priority. • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Standardize the sampling methodology and frequency in tonnage reports submitted to the division and the cities by the collection Page 3-11 companies to improve data accuracy. Perform solid waste,recycling,organics,and construction and demolition characterization studies at regular intervals to support Page 3-12 goal development and tracking. Monitor forecast data and update as needed. Page 3-1 Develop voluntary agreements with recycling companies that will Page 3-12 improve data reporting and resolve data inconsistencies. Att A Page 54 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 recasting and Data The monitoring of solid waste disposal,recycling,and waste prevention,and the forecasting of future trends are fundamental to system planning.The division routinely collects data about the amount and composition of waste and recyclable materials in the system,tracks demographic and economic trends that will affect the amount of solid waste generated in the future,and conducts focused studies to address specific topics,such as markets for recyclable materials,industry trends,and new technologies. Forecasts are used to estimate the amount of material expected to be disposed and recycled in the coming years, incorporating expected growth in population and other demographic and economic trends.This information can be used to estimate the necessary capacity of division transfer and disposal facilities and associated private-sector recycling facilities and markets. Existing data and forecasts form the basis for discussions with cities and other stakeholders about options for the future,answering questions such as: • How much waste are system users currently generating and expected to generate in the future? • How can waste generation be reduced? • What materials can be separated from the disposal stream " and turned into a resource through reuse and recycling? Division staff review plans • Who uses the solid waste facilities and curbside services, how do they choose those services,how often do they use those services,and what influences their choices? • What is the best method to provide these services? • What changes in markets and technologies need to be incorporated into our analysis of options for the future? Forecasts,planning data,and studies used in the development of this Plan are discussed in the following sections. Forecasting The division uses a planning forecast model to predict future waste generation over a 20-year period.Waste generation is defined as waste disposed plus materials recycled.The forecast is used to guide system planning,budgeting,rate setting, and operations.The primary objectives of the model are to 1)estimate future waste disposal and 2)provide estimates of the amount of materials expected to be diverted from the waste stream through division and city waste prevention and recycling programs.The planning forecast model-a regression model-relies on established statistical relationships between waste generation and various economic and demographic variables that affect it,such as population, employment,consumption'(measured as retail sales,excluding sales),and the tipping fees for garbage at division facilities. 1 The numbers for the sales tax base is taken from'The Puget Sound Economic Forecaster"which is published by Western Washington University. Sales tax base and price information are all adjusted for inflation. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 3-1 Att A Page 55 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 In late 2007,a nationwide financial crisis severely compromised the division's ability to forecast short-term trends in the economy.With the collapse of large financial institutions,a downturn in the stock market,a drop in housing prices and personal income,a jump in the unemployment rate,and a general slump in overall economic activity, the recession led to the bankruptcy of many businesses and home foreclosures.The effects of these dramatic events touched every sector of the economy including the solid waste industry. In 2007,garbage tons received at Cedar Hills surpassed the one million mark,due primarily to steady economic growth and population increases in the region over the previous few decades. Between December 2007 and December 2012,however,garbage tons disposed at Cedar Hills declined 20 percent overall.Garbage tons dropped eight percent in 2008 alone.The City of Seattle,surrounding counties,and jurisdictions in Oregon and California reported similar or greater declines in tonnage,as did regional recycling firms. The recession created a great deal of unpredictability in variables used in the division's forecast model to predict the short-term(one to five year)trends in solid waste generation.To respond to this uncertainty,the division has adjusted its approach to forecasting,using a more flexible system of ongoing monitoring.This evolving forecast method involves: • Monitoring solid waste tons delivered to division transfer stations and the Cedar Hills landfill on a daily basis, • Regularly checking regional and state-wide economic forecasts(local economic forecasts by the Western Washington University(former Dick Conway and Associates),King County's economic forecast,and forecasts by the Washington State Economic and Revenue Forecast Council), • Monitoring state-wide tax revenue streams,particularly in the home improvement sector,furniture store sales, clothing sector,and other key markets,and • Communicating regularly with other jurisdictions about the trends in their service areas. This information has been used to forecast short-term tonnage and subsequent revenues for use in critical budgeting, expenditure control,and management of capital projects over the three-to five-year period. With the new model established in 2018,the division is able to provide a prediction for disposal for the next ten years.After ten years,the tonnage forecast uses a long-term growth rate based on historical tonnage(described in further detail below).The new model also assumes that a years-long Ecology-reported recycling rate of 52 percent is sustained through 2040. An additional feature the division included in the new model is an upper and a lower estimate for the tonnage to be disposed. The main characteristics of the new model are: • Main Model o This uses the tonnage forecast model output to forecast the next 10 years,out to 2028. o After 2028,a historical trend is used to generate the disposal tons for the years from 2029-2040: • This annual growth rate is 1.73 percent,and • This historical trend is based off the disposal growth rate from 1995-2007. This period covers years after some major changes in the system occurred during the early 1990s(Seattle leaving the system,recycling changes,etc.) but before the Great Recession so it's an appropriate time period to use as a steady-state historical trend. • Upper Boundary o This incorporates the aggressive population growth rate provided by the Office of Financial Management (OFM) into our tonnage forecast model for the next 10 years,out to 2028. o After 2028,a high growth rate is used to generate the disposal for years from 2029-2040: • This annual growth rate is 2.91 percent,and • This growth rate for disposal is based on the period from 2012-2017,which has been a period of high growth since the Great Recession. 3-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 56 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Lower Boundary o This incorporates the conservative population growth rate provided by the Office of Financial Management (OFM) into our tonnage forecast model for the next 10 years,out to 2028. o After 2028,a low growth rate is used to generate the disposal for the years from 2029-2040: • This annual growth rate is 0.57percent,and • This growth rate is from 1995-2017,which is the historical trend line plus the Great Recession and recovery. Increases in population,employment,and consumption lead to more waste generated.Studies indicate that for the long-term planning forecast through 2040,the following trends are expected: • Population is expected to grow at a steady rate of one percent per year.Population growth is directly correlated with the amount of waste generated;i.e.,more people equal more waste generated.See Figures 3-1 for estimates for population growth in each transfer station service area and Figure 3-2 for the projected share of population growth in each service area. • Employment is expected to increase at an annual rate of two percent. Increased employment activity typically leads to an increase in consumption and waste generation. 2 Projections for population and employment are based on 2017 data from the Land Use Vision 2 model developed by the Puget Sound Regional Council(PSRQ.Data provided by PSRC are based on U.S.Census and other data sources and developed inclose cooperation with the county and the cities. Figure 3-1.Transfer station service areas population 2025-2040 1,800,000 11,000 11,000 11,000� 86,000 1,600,000 11,000 � 86,000 85,000 84,000 • 111 1,400,000 '• 111 Vashon • 111 1,200,000 Enumclaw 1,000,000 340,225 349,220 3 Algona *, 329,302PF Bowlake 3 C' 800,000 • I a "' d115,000 Jin Renton 600,000 :: 111 • 111 302,000 312,000 40 Factoria 40 Houghton 400,000 Shoreline 312,000 322,000 332,000 345,000 200,000 0111 106,000 108,000 111,000 113,000 2025 2030 2035 2040 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 3-3 Att A Page 57 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 3-2. Estimated share of population increase 2025 - 2040 for transfer station service areas 6% Renton FF • % 'A Bowlake Factoria Lk 24% Algona Houghton Note:The share of population increase for theO/O 3% Vashon Service area is less than 1 percent,so it Enumclaw is not indicated in this figure. Shoreline The projections shown in Figure 3-3 are based on the 2018 forecast.The tonnage forecast will be routinely adjusted to reflect factors that affect waste generation,such as the success of waste prevention and recycling programs and future events that affect economic development. Figure 3-3. Projection of solid waste recycled and disposed 2018 - 2040 Estimated Recycling 3,500,000 Tons Disposed 3,000,000 2,500,000 N 2,000,000 z O 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 3-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 58 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Current Data on Regional Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal Measuring the results of waste prevention and recycling efforts is a complex process.Discussions and data often focus on recycling and recycling rates,when in fact waste prevention is the number one priority.While programmatic successes for waste prevention can be assessed qualitatively,it is difficult to measure directly how much waste is "not created"in terms of tons or percentages.What can be measured more accurately is recycling and disposal activities. Data for these activities are available through division tonnage and transaction records,reports from the curbside collection companies,the Washington State Department of Ecology(Ecology),and the division's waste characterization studies.Using data on the types and amounts of materials recycled,combined with measures of waste disposed,the division can evaluate its success in reaching the goals established with each successive comprehensive solid waste management plan. Figure 3-4 shows the tons of materials recycled and disposed in 2015 (most recent data from Ecology) by category of waste generator-single-family residents;multi-family residents;non-residential customers such as businesses, institutions,and government entities;and self-haulers who bring materials directly to the division's transfer stations. More specific information on each generator type(including generators of construction and demolition debris for recycling and disposal)follows. Recycling data comes from numerous external sources.These are described in more detail in the section Tracking Our Progress.Note that the scale on each figure varies. Figure 3-4. 2015 Recycling and disposal by generator type 1,000,000 Recycled Disposed 750,000 643,069 500,000 "' III II 325,125 250,000 21,333 36,034 Single-family Multi-family Non-residential Self-haul While there has been considerable progress in waste prevention and recycling over the years,there is still room for improvement.As Figure 3-4 illustrates,the single-family sector provides the greatest opportunity to divert materials from disposal,with about 260,000 tons of materials disposed in 2015.Single-family residents are recycling more than 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 3-5 Att A Page 59 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 56 percent of their waste,but division studies indicate that a large portion of the disposed materials could be recycled or reused (as discussed in the next section).The multi-family sector generates the least amount of garbage and recycling of all sectors,but shows a need for improvement in recycling. The data shows that self-haulers as a group are recycling the smallest fraction of their waste.That may be because at many of the older transfer stations there is limited or no opportunity to recycle.At this time,however,two of the division's urban stations are undergoing,or are being considered for,renovation.A major goal of the renovation plan is to add space for collection of more recyclables and to build flexibility into the design to allow for collection of additional materials as markets develop.Adding space for collection of greater amounts and a wider array of materials is expected to result in higher recycling rates at the transfer stations. With studies indicating that 70 percent of the waste that reaches the landfill could have been recycled or reused,and specific data on what those materials are,we can focus on areas that will have substantial influence on the region's per capita disposal rate.The following sections address each category of generator and identify some of the more significant areas for improvement. 5ingie+amity Residents Sixty-five percent of the households in the division's service area are single-family homes.In 2015,these single-family households recycled on average about 56 percent of their waste. Ninety-six percent of the yard waste and 79 percent of the paper generated were recycled by this sector in 2015 (Figure 3-5).While food scraps and food-soiled paper made up over 35 percent of the waste disposed by single-family residents in 2015,recycling of these materials has increased as participation in the curbside collection program for these materials continues to grow.Considerable amounts of the standard curbside recyclables-glass and plastic containers,tin and aluminum cans,mixed waste paper,newspaper,and cardboard-while easily recyclable,are still present in the waste disposal stream. Figure 3-5. 2015 Recycling and disposal by single-family residents Material Tons Recycled Material Tons Containers* 9% 30,666 Disposed Containers* 2% 5,740 Plastic bags& 1% 4619 Plastic bags& ° ,Wrap Wrap 8/0 21,695 Mixed paper, newspaper, 32% 103,647 p � � Mixed paper, ° cardboard 56 %O � newspaper, 10/0 26,901 Tons cardboard Food scraps Recycled ' ' Food scraps &food-soiled 0% 293 &food-soiled 35% 89,848 paper paper Yard waste 49% 160,463 Yard waste 3% 7,285 Scrap metal 5% 15,101 Scrap metal 3% 6,895 Other 3% 10,336 Total Tons Generation:584,636 Other 39% 101,147 materials materials Tons Recycled:325,125 Tons Disposed:259,511 Tin,aluminum,glass,and plastic 3-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 60 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Recommendations for improving and standardizing curbside collection for single-family residents are discussed in Chapter 4,Sustainable Materials Management.Other recyclables found in the single-family waste stream in smaller amounts include scrap metal,textiles,plastic bags and plastic wrap,and some construction and demolition debris,such as clean wood and gypsum wallboard. If all recyclable materials were removed from the single-family waste stream,nearly one-third of the remaining,non- recyclable materials would be disposable diapers and pet wastes. Multi-Family Residents Thirty-five percent of the households in the service area are in multi-family complexes.In 2015,the average multi- family recycling rate in the county's service area was 21 percent.While this rate is considerably lower than the single- family rate,overall generation and disposal from multi-family residences is lower and the difference from single-family recycling rates is less when yard waste(which is minimal for multi-family) is removed from the calculation.As with single-family residents,the primary areas of opportunity are in recycling food scraps and food-soiled paper and the standard curbside recyclables,including paper and cardboard (Figure 3-6). Figure 3-6. 2015 Recycling and disposal by multi-family residents Material Tons Material Tons Recycled Disposed Containers* 20% 7,348 Containers* 3% 3,969 Plastic bags& 3% 1,014 Plastic bags& 7% 9,007 Wrap Mixed paper 63% 22,752 21 /�� Mixed paper 14% 18,872 Food scraps& Food scraps& �% _ Tons • 32% 44,445 food waste Recycled . • _ • food waste Yard waste 3% 1,206 Yard waste 2% 3,157 Scrap metal 9% 3,315 Scrap metal 3% 3,733 OOtherials 1% 399 OOtherials er 39% 53,901 matTons Recycled:36,034 Total Tons Generation: 173,118 Tons Disposed:137,084 Tin,aluminum,glass,and plastic Other materials present in the multi-family waste stream,both recyclable and non-recyclable,are similar to those found in the single-family waste stream. It is difficult to track multi-family recycling rates because of: 1)the varied nature of multi-family complexes,2)the growth in construction of mixed-use buildings that contain both residential and non-residential units,and 3)the varied levels of recycling services provided.What is clear is the need to provide adequate space for garbage and recyclables collection at these complexes and to standardize collection across the county. A detailed discussion of ways to improve recycling at multi-family and mixed-use complexes is provided in Chapter 4, Sustainable Materials Management. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 3-7 Att A Page 61 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Non-Residential Generators Nonresidential generators-businesses,institutions,and government entities-recycled an estimated 73 percent of their waste in 2015. Despite having the highest recycling rate of any sector,non-residential generators still present an opportunity for increasing King County's overall recycling rate(Figure 3-7).There are an estimated 771,000 employees in the service area working at an estimated 49,000 businesses and organizations.The make-up of the non-residential sector ranges from manufacturing to high-tech and retail to food services.The recycling potential for any particular business or industry varies depending on the nature of the business. For example,restaurants and grocers are the largest contributors of food waste,while manufacturers may generate large quantities of plastic wrap and other packaging materials. Because of the diversity of business and industry in the region,a more individualized approach is needed to increase recycling in this sector. There are significant opportunities in the non-residential sector to increase the diversion of food scraps and food- soiled paper.The largest increase will be realized as more restaurants and grocers contract with private-sector companies to collect their food scraps for composting and more cities begin to offer commercial organics collection. Figure 3-7. 2015 Recycling and disposal by non-residential generators Tons Recycled Material Tons ° Diisposecll`-�,,' Containers 4% 1 24,487 Containers 2% 5,726 Plastic bags& 2% 10,733 Plastic bags& ° Wrap Wrap 10/0 23,037 — orMixed paper, hkMixed paper, newspaper, 39% 237,893 72% newspaper, 17% 39,684 cardboard Tons - cardboard Food scraps Recycled Food scraps &food-soiled 18% 110,940 &food-soiled 31% 72,920 paper paper Clean wood 5% 27,186 Clean wood 4% 9,629 O Yard waste 2% 10,303 Yard waste 4% 8,614 Scrap metal 14% 84,524 Scrap metal 3% 6,895 Total Tons Generation:838,444 Carpet and Carpet and pad,furniture, 0% - pad,furniture, 2% 4,748 mattresses mattresses Otherials 16% 96,841 Otherials er 27% 64,284 matTons Recycled:602,907 Tons Disposed:235,537 Tin,aluminum,glass,and plastic Another opportunity for reducing overall disposal is with commercially generated paper.While large amounts of paper are being recycled,almost 40,000 tons of recyclable paper were disposed by businesses in 2015. Paper may also provide an opportunity for waste prevention-notjust moving from disposal to recycling,but aiming to reduce the generation of waste paper. 3-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 62 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Self-haulers Self-haulers are residential and non-residential customers who choose to bring garbage and recyclables to the transfer facilities themselves.According to on-site surveys conducted as part of the division's waste characterization studies,the two most common reasons given for self-hauling are: 1) having a large quantity of waste or large or bulky items to dispose,and 2)wanting to avoid the cost of commercial collection.About 37 percent of the materials disposed by self-haulers have the potential for recycling,most significantly clean wood,yard waste,scrap metal,and paper(Figure 3-8). Figure 3-8. 2015 Recycling and disposal by transfer facility self-haulers Tons Recycled Material Tons Disposed Curbside Curbside 9% 21,362 recyclables* 23% 4,781 recyclables* Food scraps Food scraps &food-soiled 0% - &food-soiled 2% 5,168 paper °4110iu�uuim paper Clean wood 10% 2,096 80% • % Clean wood 14% 32,331 Yard waste 55% 11,723 Tons Yard waste 5% 11,322 Scrap Recycled Scrap metal and 12% 2,571 metal and 9% 21,521 appliances appliances Carpet and L: Carpet and pad,furniture, 0% - pad,furniture, 12% 28,712 mattresses Total Tons Generation:258,901 mattresses Other 49% 117,252 Other 0% 62 materials materials Tons Recycled:21,233 Tons Disposed:237,668 Glass and plastic containers,tin and aluminum cans,mixed paper,newspaper,and cardboard At the older stations and drop boxes where space is limited,the division provides collection containers for the standard curbside recyclables,which include glass and plastic containers,tin and aluminum cans,mixed waste paper, newspaper,and cardboard. No recyclables are collected at the Algona Transfer Station due to space limitations.At the stations that have been renovated and there is more space,additional materials such as textiles,scrap metal,used bikes and appliances are also collected.Other materials will be collected as markets develop.There are a number of materials still prevalent in the self-haul waste stream for which there are currently insufficient or no recycling markets, such as treated and painted wood. Generators of Construction and Demolition Debris In 2015,nearly 900,000 tons of construction and demolition debris were generated in King County. Debris from the construction,remodeling,repair,or demolition of buildings,other structures,and roads includes clean wood, 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 3-9 Att A Page 63 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 painted and treated wood,dimensional lumber,gypsum wallboard,roofing,siding,structural metal,wire,insulation, packaging materials,and concrete,asphalt,and other aggregates. Clean wood makes up about 24 percent of the construction and demolition debris that is being disposed.Other recyclable construction and demolition materials that are being disposed include scrap metal,clean gypsum,and asphalt shingles. Figure 3-9 shows the composition of construction and demolition materials diverted and disposed in 2015 based on reports from private processing facilities, Ecology data,and waste monitoring at the division's transfer stations (Cascadia 2012a).Most concrete,asphalt,and aggregates are source separated for recycling atjobsites and are not reflected in these numbers.For more information on construction and demolition debris collection and recycling see Chapter 4,Sustainable Materials Management. Figure 3-9. 2015 Construction and demolition materials diverted and disposed WiFIMIM Tons Recycled Material Tons 111/1111,,,, Disposed Clean wood 4% 35,245 _ Clean wooda 24% 41,272 Asphalt ° Asphalt 17% 28,891 g roofin 0% 2,432 roofing Clean gypsum 5% 43,435 84% Clean gypsum 6% 9,802 � Tons Metals 4% 6,707 Metals 21% 186,680 Recycled Aggregatesa 58% 507,583 Aggregatesa 6% 11,178 Other Other recyclable 15% 25,451 recyclable 0% 2,462 materialsb materialsb Materials with Materials with low recycling 28% 48,667 low recycling 11% 99,594 Total Tons Generation: 1,049,399 potential potential Tons Recycled:877,431 Tons Disposed:171,968 aDiverted total includes only aggregate material(asphalt/concrete,brick and masonry)processed at mixed construction and demolition debris processing facilities;it does not include aggregate materials that are source separated atjobsites,which comprise approximately 450,000 tons of asphalt/concrete. bincludes glass,yard waste,carpet and pad,textiles,plastics,and paper. c Includes painted and treated wood,painted/demolition gypsum,plastics,and other mixed construction and demolition debris. Tracking Progress The division uses a wide range of available data,both qualitative and quantitative,to evaluate the success of waste prevention and recycling efforts.Over the years,the division has developed a robust collection of surveys and data from a variety of sources to track progress. In most cases,more than one source of data is needed to accurately quantify how well the region is doing in diverting materials from the waste stream. For example,to track progress toward a target of 4.1 or fewer pounds of waste per employee per week,the number of employees in the service area for a given year is divided into the annual tons of garbage generated by the non-residential sector,as reported 3-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 64 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 in customer surveys conducted at transfer stations and information submitted to the division by the collection companies.Using these data,pounds per week can be calculated.The targets are tracked using aggregate data for the service area,rather than using data by individual city or unincorporated area. The following subsections provide information on the types of data collected,how those data are calculated,and how reliable the data are,as well as recommendations on how the data might be improved. Tonnage and Transaction Data An automated cashiering system is used to track data on the tons of garbage received and number of customer visits at division transfer facilities.In-bound and out-bound scales weigh loads for all vehicles except fixed-rate vehicles (as defined in KCC 10.04.020 MM),which are charged a minimum fee that assumes a weight of 320 pounds or less.These data are used to track overall garbage tonnage and transactions at individual stations. Data for recyclables accepted for a fee,such as yard waste,are also tracked by the cashiering system. For recyclables collected at no charge,data are provided to the division by the hauling company that is contracted to collect them. Reports from the Commercial Collection Companies The private-sector companies that provide curbside collection of residential garbage and recyclables throughout most of King County submit monthly tonnage reports to the division.These reports are also provided to the cities. Data for single-family households are the most complete,providing the following monthly information for each city and for unincorporated areas operating under a Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission tariff: • Tons of garbage disposed, • Tons recycled by material type, • Tons of organic materials recycled (yard waste,including food scraps for most areas),and • Number of garbage,recycling,and organics collection customers. Generally,customer counts and tonnage numbers for single-family garbage,recycling,and organics are the most reliable because they are based on weights measured at the entrance scale of either county transfer stations (for garbage) or material recovery facilities(for recyclables).To estimate the tons of individual materials(such as newspaper,aluminum cans,and so on),collection companies take periodic random samples and determine the percentage of each material present in the loads.As overall recycling tonnage is weighed,tons for individual materials are allocated based on the percentages obtained in the random sampling.The county has worked with the haulers to develop and implement a standard protocol for sampling in order to provide reliable estimates of the component recyclables and contaminant materials. The same information provided for single-family residents is provided for multi-family residents and nonresidential generators;however,the per capita data are less accurate because the number of apartment units and business customers is not provided. In some cases,the same truck collects multi-family and nonresidential wastes,so collection companies must estimate how much waste comes from each generator type. Even though some waste may be allocated to the wrong generator type,overall changes in recycling and disposal are reflected in tonnage totals, thereby providing a reasonable indicator of change. Since non-residential recycling collection is open-market and because many companies besides the large hauling companies provide commercial recycling services,a non-residential recycling rate cannot be calculated from the collection company data.This means that an overall system-wide recycling rate cannot be calculated using these data alone. 2019 Comprehenszz)eSolzd Waste 2wanagementPlan-ju1y2028 3-11 Att A Page 65 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Ecology Survey Data Data on the total tons recycled come from the annual statewide survey of recycling companies conducted by Ecology. These data supplement curbside collection data by including recyclables collected by private sector companies across the region. Recycling companies are required by state law to report tonnage data on the survey,which asks for tons by material type,by generator type(residential or non-residential),and by the county in which the materials were generated. For King County,companies are also asked if materials were generated in the City of Seattle. The division uses the Ecology survey data to estimate both non-residential and overall recycling rates.All of the recycling tonnage reported by Ecology is counted as non-residential except for tonnage that was included in residential collection company reports and recycling tonnage from transfer stations.Use of this accounting method means that recyclables taken by residents to privately owned drop boxes or recycling centers are included in the non-residential recycling tonnage.Ecology survey data are also used to estimate construction and demolition debris diversion. While the Ecology data provide the status of statewide efforts,there are some limitations to the usefulness of the data for local planning and evaluation,including the following: • Because data from Ecology is not immediately available,there is about a three-year lag before the county is able to finalize annual recycling rates, • Data are self-reported by recycling companies,with few resources available to Ecology for checking accuracy, • Companies make unverified estimates about the county in which the recyclables were generated,and the reporting for data between King County and the City of Seattle has been inconsistent,resulting in tonnage variations from year to year which seem unlikely, • City-specific information,other than for the City of Seattle,is not available, • The identification of residential versus non-residential sources is not reliable, • The identity of some companies that report data is confidential,limiting the ability to verify the quantities reported,and some of the companies with confidential data report only statewide totals,which requires the county to estimate allocation based upon population percentages,and • Significant amounts of metal are reported;it is difficult to determine how much of this metal should be counted as municipal solid waste,how much as construction and demolition debris,and how much as auto bodies,which the county does not include in its waste generation or recycling totals. Improving the reliability of recycling data would greatly benefit our ability to evaluate progress in reaching our recycling goals.The division will work with Ecology and the cities to develop voluntary agreements with recycling companies that will improve data reporting and resolve data inconsistencies. Waste Characterization Studies Since 1990,the division has conducted a Waste Monitoring Program to understand who uses solid waste system facilities,what materials they bring to the stations,how and why they use our facilities,and how satisfied they are with the services provided.To answer these questions,the division retains consultants to conduct both waste characterization studies and customer surveys that analyze the municipal solid waste received at county facilities 3-12 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 66 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 for disposal at Cedar Hills. For these studies,the waste stream is examined by collecting and sorting sample loads delivered to transfer facilities in King County.These studies help the county and the cities understand the composition of both the overall waste stream and what is received from different types of generators,such as residents of single- family homes and apartments,non-residential customers,and self-haulers.Separate analyses are conducted of the construction and demolition debris and organics waste streams. The waste characterization studies are designed to provide a statistically valid picture of what is being disposed by the different generator types.Samples are taken over the course of a full year to account for seasonal variations.The sampling method is designed to ensure that all generator types and geographical areas are sufficiently sampled.The studies provide a high level of confidence of what is in the waste stream.Each study,described below,is conducted by the division as necessary to provide up-to-date information for planning purposes. Solid Waste Characterization Studies The most recent study of solid waste destined for Cedar Hills was conducted in 2015 (Cascadia 2015a). For this study, 421 samples were collected on 28 sampling days.The waste stream was separated into 97 categories of material. For each material and generator classification,the study was designed to achieve a 90 percent confidence interval for the amount of waste disposed countywide. In other words,the study tells us that we can be 90 percent sure that the amount of cardboard disposed in 2015 was 3.1 percent(26,112 tons)of the total waste stream,plus or minus 0.3 percent. These waste characterization r studies are not designed to characterize each city's waste stream. However,based on _ sampling done in a variety of communities,the types of materials disposed by residents are similar,while the amounts r may differ.For example, Q jurisdictions with food waste ' � collection programs will have lower percentages of food in their garbage than those without. y These differences are reflected in the recycling rates and pounds f' disposed per household for each jurisdiction. In-person surveys are also Garbage at the Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station administered to customers bringing materials to transfer facilities(Cascadia 2015a).Customers are asked about the types of wastes they are bringing,the origin of those wastes,reasons for self-hauling (rather than using curbside collection services),how often waste is self-hauled,and willingness to separate out various recyclable materials.These surveys provide a better understanding of the customers who visit the stations and,in turn,provide the proper levels of service.The surveys are also useful in informing programmatic decisions. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 3-13 Att A Page 67 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Customer satisfaction surveys are also conducted at the stations to evaluate the level of satisfaction with customer service and the disposal and recycling services provided at division facilities(Cascadia 2016).The division uses this information to monitor its performance and identify areas where improvements can be made. Organics Characterization Studies Curbside yard waste collection services throughout King County accept food waste(food scraps and food-soiled paper),and the division is now working to measure how much food waste is actually collected from residential sources. Reports from the collection companies provide information about total tons of organics delivered to compost facilities,but do not differentiate between yard waste tons and food scrap tons.The solid waste characterization studies described above measure decreases of food scraps and food-soiled paper in the waste stream,but not whether the decreases result from curbside collection or from other diversion,such as home composting. To improve our ability to measure progress in organics recycling and establish achievable goals,the division is conducting periodic characterization studies of organics collected at the curb from single-family households.The division conducted its fourth organics waste characterization in 2017(Cascadia 2017b) and plans to conduct studies every two to three years.The study looked at total organics generation,assessing how many food scraps were disposed in the organics cart and the garbage can.The division has started planning for discussions with stakeholders to ensure there is adequate organics processing capacity for the materials now being disposed to be processed more sustainably in the future. Construction and Demolition Debris Characterization Studies In 2001,the division began to conduct periodic characterization studies of construction and demolition debris disposed at select private facilities by commercial and self-haulers,as well as small quantities delivered to division transfer stations by self-haulers.The studies measure the composition of construction and demolition debris that continues to be disposed instead of recycled.Three studies have been conducted to date,with the last study completed in 2011 (Cascadia 2012a).Information from the waste composition studies helped to inform what materials would be designated as readily recyclable under the new construction and demolition debris recycling ordinance (see Chapter 4,Sustainable Materials Management for more information). Planning Tools To support overall system planning and determine appropriate rates,the division conducts focused studies to evaluate elements of the solid waste system and its operations,emerging technologies and industry challenges,and private-sector markets for recycling and reuse.The division will conduct additional planning studies as needed to explore a variety of topics including best practices in solid waste management,alternative disposal technologies,and sustainable financing. Major studies used in development of the Plan are listed on the next page. Plans or studies approved by Council action are noted. 3-14 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 Att A Page 68 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Plans and Studies • 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(KCSWD 2002)-This is the last adopted plan.The 2001 Plan was approved by the King County Council in 2002. • Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan(KCSWD 2006b) - Provides recommendations to guide the future of solid waste management,including the renovation of the urban transfer system and options for extending the life of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill.The plan was approved by the King County Council in December 2007. • Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill 2010 Site Development Plan(KCSWD 2010a)- Identifies development alternatives for the landfill,outlines the environmental impacts of each alternative,and identifies potential mitigation measures,and recommends a preferred alternative. • Project Program Plan:Cedar Hills Regional Landfi112010Site Development Plan(KCSWD 2010b)-Summarizes the preferred alternative for development of the landfill based on environmental review,operational feasibility,cost, stakeholder interest,and flexibility to further expand landfill capacity if future circumstances warrant.The plan was approved by the County Council in December 2010. • Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan Review(KCSWD 2013)-The division conducted this review in response to a budget proviso in Ordinance 17619.The purpose of the review was to assess transfer station options and resulting impacts to cost,service and the environment.The recommendations helped inform changes to the plans for the Factoria,South County,and Northeast County recycling and transfer station projects. • DRAFT 2011 and 2013 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(KCSWD 2013c).The draft updates of the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan were used as the basis for this Plan update. • Sustainable Solid Waste Management Plan(KCSWD 2014)-Evaluates operational and strategic planning options and provides recommendations on implementation approaches.The study focuses on five areas:resource recovery at division facilities;construction and demolition debris management;organics processing;disposal alternatives and technologies;and sustainable system financing. • Solid Waste Transferand Waste Management Plan Review Part//(KCSWD 2015)-In response to Council Motion 14145, the division,in collaboration with stakeholders,continued to evaluate a mix of capital facilities and operational approaches to address system needs over time, including potential demand management strategies(such as peak hour pricing or controlled access hours)that could motivate changes in how customers use transfer stations, thereby potentially reducing the need for added transfer station capacity in the northeast county. • Cedar Hills Site Development Alternatives Final Report, Volumes 1 and 2(KCSWD 2017a) -Summarizes the options for continued development of the landfill based on operational feasibility,cost,stakeholder interest,and flexibility to further expand landfill capacity if future circumstances warrant. Division staff review plan for centralized project management unit 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 3-15 Att A Page 69 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Executive Proposed Solid Waste Disposal Fees 2017-2018(KCSWD 2016c)-Rate study that examines four key inputs that determine solid waste disposal fees-financial assumptions,tonnage forecast,revenue and expenditures projections,and required target fund balance.Fees are calculated to ensure that revenues are sufficient to cover the costs of operations and services;funds are available for landfill closure and maintenance and capital investment projects for the transfer and disposal system;and a reserve Operating Fund balance is maintained.The 2017-2018 Proposed Solid Waste Disposal Fees were approved by the King County Council in September 2016. • Executive Proposed Solid Waste Disposal Fees 2019-2020(KCSWD 2018b)- Rate study that examines four key inputs that determine solid waste disposal fees-financial assumptions,tonnage forecast,revenue and expenditures projections,and required target fund balance.Fees are calculated to ensure that revenues are sufficient to cover the costs of operations and services;funds are available for landfill closure and maintenance and capital investment projects for the transfer and disposal system;and a reserve Operating Fund balance is maintained. The 2019-2020 Proposed Solid Waste Disposal Fees were transmitted to the King County Council in July 2018. Evaluation of Technologies • 2006 Material Recovery Facility Assessment(Cascadia 2006)- Provides an assessment of four materials recovery facilities where commingled recyclables collected at the curb are sorted and processed.The purpose was to quantify and characterize materials processed at the materials recovery facilities.Materials recovery facilities activity and capacity will continue to be tracked as necessary to monitor the need for improvements and to ensure there is processing capability for additional materials diverted from disposal in the future. • Comparative Evaluation of Waste Export and Conversion Technologies Disposal Options (R.W. Beck 2007)-Provides a planning-level " ° assessment and comparison of various solid waste conversion technologies and waste export. • Anaerobic Digestion Feasibility Study(H DR 2017)-Assesses the viability of several different scenarios using anaerobic digestion t • to process organic materials collected in Cedar Hills Regional Landfill King County. • King County Waste to Energy Study(Normandeau 2017)- Evaluates waste-to-energy technologies and recommends the technology that best matches King County's circumstances. Waste Prevention and Recycling Studies • Sustainable Curbside Collection Pilot(KCSWD et al.2008b) -Presents results of a pilot study to test the feasibility and public acceptance of every-other-week curbside garbage collection.Conducted in the City of Renton,the pilot study was performed in conjunction with Public Health-Seattle&King County and Waste Management, Inc.and was permanently implemented in 2009. 3-16 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 Att A Page 70 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Greenhouse Gas Emissions in King County:An Updated Geographic-plus Inventory,a Consumption-based Inventory,and an Ongoing Tracking Framework(King County 2012)-Presents results from two different,but complementary,inventories of GHG emissions associated with King County,Washington. • Optimized Transfer Station Recycling Feasibility Study(KCSWD 2013)-Evaluates methods to optimize County resources being dedicated to recycling activities at division transfer facilities. • Waste Monitoring Program:Market Assessment for Recyclable Materials in King County(Cascadia 2015a)- Helps identify opportunities and establish priorities for market development and increased diversion of recyclable materials from the waste stream. Data from the market assessment are used to guide the direction of future recycling programs and services recommended in this Plan. Other Plans Considered The Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan is just one component of regional planning for land use, development,and environmental protection in King County.The division considers plans developed by the state, the county,and the City of Seattle in its own planning process to ensure consistency with other planning efforts in the region.The following list was used in the development of this Plan;in future planning efforts,the division will refer to the newest version of these plans. • On the Path to Sustainability and 2011 Plan Amendment-Picking .�IITI� Up the Pace to Zero Waste(City of Seattle 1998/2011)-The City of Seattle's solid waste management plan,including goals for ° recycling and waste prevention. • 2010 Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan Update(Watson et al.2010)- Presents plans for managing hazardous wastes Y'. . produced in small quantities by households and businesses and for preventing these wastes from entering the solid waste J stream. • The State Solid and Hazardous Waste Plan:Moving Washington Beyond Waste and Toxics 2015 Update(Ecology 2015) - Presents the state's long-term strategy for systematically eliminating wastes and the use of toxic substances.The plan _ includes initiatives that focus on expanding the recycling ofm ' organic materials and advancing green building practices. • King County Strategic Plan(King County 2015a)- Presents countywide goals for setting high standards of customer service and performance,building regional partnerships, Y M" stabilizing the long-term budget,and working together as Division staff conducting sampling one county to create a growing economy and sustainable communities.This Plan supports each of the primary goals of the King County Strategic Plan,with particular emphasis on environmental sustainability and service excellence. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 3-17 Att A Page 71 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Strategic Climate Action Plan(King County 2015b) -Synthesizes King County's most critical goals,objectives, strategies and priority actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prepare for the effects of climate change. It provides a single resource for information about King County's climate efforts. • 2016 King County Comprehensive Plan(2016 Update)(King County 2016a)-The guiding policy document for all land use and development regulations in unincorporated King County,as well as for establishing the establishment of Urban Growth Area boundaries and regional services throughout the county,including transit,sewers,parks,trails,and open space.Updates to the 2016 plan were adopted by the County Council in December,2016. • King County Equity and Social Justice Strategic Plan 2016-2022(King County 2016b)-The county's blueprint for change that will guide policies and decision-making,design and delivery of services,and workplace practices in order to advance equity. 3-18 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 72 Ordinance 18893 pdated April rr -foo Mmle- A � v V { r w ter, i a .III Att A Page 73 Ordinance 14893 update 2019 w AO iL sw Sustain bl M a t e,ri Mana m lIF , w i x a n to r m . MNM 4�r �. • Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Policies /Goal Achieve Zero Waste of Resources-to eliminate the disposal of materials with economic value-by 2030,with an interim goal of 70 percent recycling through a combination of efforts in the following order of priority: a. Waste prevention and reuse, b. Product stewardship, c. Recycling and composting,and d. Beneficial use. ��14144 S-1 Set achievable targets for reducing waste generation and disposal and increasing recycling and reuse. S-2 Enhance,develop,and implement waste prevention and recycling programs that will increase waste diversion from disposal using a combination of tools: a. Infrastructure, b. Education and promotion, �Y G c. Incentives, d. Mandates, e. Enforcement,and f. Partnerships. S-3 Advocate for product stewardship in the design and management of manufactured products and greater responsibility for manufacturers to divert these products from the waste stream. S-4 Prevent waste generation by focusing on upstream activities, including encouraging sustainable consumption behaviors,such as buying only what one needs,buying durable,buying secondhand, sharing,reusing,repairing,and repurposing. t S-5 Work with regional partners to find the highest value end uses for recycled and composted materials,support market development, and develop circular supply loops to serve production needs. S-6 Strive to ensure that materials diverted from the King County waste stream for recycling,composting,and reuse are handled and processed using methods that are protective of human health and the environment. Att A Page 75 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Policies S-7 Provide for efficient collection of solid waste,recyclables,and organics,while protecting public health and the environment, promoting equitable service,and maximizing the diversion of recyclables and organics from disposal. S-8 Promote efficient collection and processing systems that work together to minimize contamination and residual waste,maximize diversion from disposal,and provide adequate capacity. Att A Page 76 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions The following table includes a menu of recommended actions that the county and the cities should implement.Under the responsibility column,the entity listed first has primary responsibility for the action,bold indicates that the entity has responsibility for the action, and a star(*) indicates that the action is a priority. If the responsibility is not in bold,the action has lower implementation priority. Action Detailed Number and Action Discussion Responsibility Regional Leadership Lead by example by improving waste prevention and recycling in Page 4-7 public-sector operations,facilities,and at sponsored events,as well as through the purchase of sustainable products. Form a regional responsible recycling forum to work with public Page 4-15 and private partners to address production,use,and end-of-life management of goods.The forum will identify ways to strengthen recyclables markets,reduce contamination,and improve the quality and quantity of recyclable materials through more uniform city/county recycling approaches,education and outreach,and other means. Education, Outreach and Technical Assistance Provide regional education outreach support and incentive programs Page 4-8 to overcome barriers for residents and businesses to effectively prevent waste. Emphasize the primary importance of purchase and product use decisions that prevent waste,and secondary importance of recycling items/materials that couldn't be prevented. Work in partnership with other governments,non-governmental organizations,and the private sector to maximize the effectiveness of these efforts. Provide waste prevention and recycling education programs in Page 4-11 County schools throughout the county,and help schools and school districts establish,maintain,and improve the programs. Continue to educate customers on proper recycling techniques to Page 4-8 cocolluction companies nty, reduce contamination of recyclables and organic feedstocks going to the materials recovery facilities and compost facilities. Att A Page 77 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Increase educational outreach and promotion to single-family,multi-family, Page 4-19 and non-residential customers to encourage recycling and reduce waste. Increase single-family food scrap recycling through a three-year Page 4-16 educational cart tagging program. Continue to develop infrastructure and increase regional and local Page 4-16 educational outreach,incentives and promotion to increase recycling of food scraps and food-soiled paper.These efforts should target single-family and multi-family residential developments,as well as non- residential buildings such as schools,institutions,and businesses. Provide information and technical assistance to external agencies,such Page 4-20 as local governments,schools,colleges,and other public and private organizations to increase their purchase of sustainable products.Support implementation of the county's Sustainable Purchasing Policy through waste reduction,recycling,use of recyclable products,and green building. Policy and Infrastructure Work with public and private partners to support the development of Page 4-18 reuse and recycling value chains,including markets,for target products and materials.Employ incentives and material-specific projects that reduce or eliminate barriers to reuse and recycling. Pursue product stewardship strategies through a combination of voluntary Page 4-12 and mandatory programs for products that contain toxic materials,are difficult and expensive to manage,and/or need sustainable financing, including,but not limited to,paint,carpet,fluorescent bulbs and tubes, mercury thermostats,batteries,unwanted medicine,mattresses,e-waste, paper and packaging,plastic bags and film,and sharps.Strategies may include Right to Repair legislation and framework legislation for addressing producer responsibility. Explore options to increase recycling and resource recovery through Page 4-15 innovative methods and technologies. and 6-3 Att A Page 78 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of ReCOmmended Actions • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Assess and develop options if selected actions are not enough to achieve Page 4-3 an overall 70 percent recycling rate. Reduce consumer use of common single-use items-for example, Page 4-10 • promote reusable shopping and produce bags. Work with food producers,grocers,restaurants,and schools to prevent Page 4-11 food waste and to increase food recovery through donation of surplus meals and staple food items to local food banks. • Develop a process and criteria to amend the designated recyclables list if Page 4-13 conditions warrant adding or removing recyclables. Measurement Use the following targets to measure the progress toward the goal of zero Page 4-5 waste of resources: 1. Generation rate target: • Per capita:20.4 pounds/week by 2030,and • Per employee:42.2 pounds/week by 2030. 2. Recycling rate target: Interim goal of 70 percent. 3. Disposal rate target: • Per capita:5.1 pounds/week by 2030,and • Per employee:4.1 pounds/week by 2030. These targets should be evaluated at least every three years when data becomes available from the waste monitoring studies. Develop a target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from disposed Page 4-12 waste by 2030,with 2007 emissions used as a baseline for comparison. Att A Page 79 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of ReCOmmended Actions • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Grants Continue to support the cities'implementation of the Plan through Page 4-19 the county waste reduction and recycling grant program and allocation of Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology.The county should strive to maintain the level of funding to cities,increasing waste reduction and recycling grant amounts as Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance funding decreases;and should revise or amend grant criteria to reflect priority Comprehensive Plan actions. Work collaboratively with cities and other stakeholders to develop a Page 4-20 new competitive grant program funded from the tip fee that would be available to private entities,non-profits,and cities to support innovative programs that help meet plan goals. Evaluate options to transition away from recycling collection events Page 4-19 as enhanced recycling services are provided at renovated transfer stations,improved bulky item collection becomes available and cost effective curbside,and product stewardship programs emerge. Develop a list of effective waste prevention and recycling efforts that Page 4-19 can be implemented using existing and new grant funds. Green Building Adopt green building policies and regulations that support the Page 4-1 design of buildings and structures that are carbon neutral,are energy efficient,and use recycled materials. Assist cities in developing green building policies and practices; Page 4-32 encourage green building through Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design TI(LEED'), Built Green T', Living Building Challenge,and other certification programs. Provide technical assistance and promote proper deconstruction, Page 4-35 building reuse,and reuse of building materials. Att A Page 80 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of ReCOmmended Actions • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Construction and Demolition Materials Recycling Work collaboratively with cities to implement building codes Page 4-35 that require compliance with construction and demolition debris recycling and handling requirements contained in county code. The county will provide outreach/promotion for city permitting and enforcement staff. Continue to explore options to increase the diversion of construction Page 4-35 and demolition debris from disposal in the landfill,particularly for wood,metal,cardboard,asphalt shingles,carpet,and gypsum wallboard. Increase regional recycling of construction and demolition materials Page 4-35 through education and enforcement of construction and demolition debris recycling requirements. Ensure that construction and demolition debris is managed in Page 4-35 an environmentally sound manner by privately owned landfills via enforcement of construction and demolition debris handling requirements contained in county code. Collection Involve the Vashon/Maury Island community and service providers to Page 4-21 develop the appropriate type of recycling services provided curbside and at the transfer station. Include Vashon in the county's collection service standards for curbside services. Explore options to increase the efficiency and reduce the price of Page 4-28 • curbside and multi-family collection of bulky items,while diverting as many items as possible for reuse or recycling. Adopt the single and multi-family minimum collection standards. Page 4-30&4-31 Att A Page 81 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Consider improvements to single-family collection services in the Page 4-29 unincorporated area to increase the recycling rate. Include non-residential recycling services in city contracts(consistent Page 4-33 with state law). Consider implementing an incentive-based rate structure for non- Page 4-33 residential garbage customers to encourage recycling. Update and enforce building code requirements to ensure adequate Page 4-30 and conveniently located space for garbage,recycling,and organics collection containers in multi-family,commercial,and mixed-use buildings. Make recycling at multi-family complexes convenient by Page 4-30 implementing best practices. Att A Page 82 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Ltainable Materials Mamaement In 1989,the state adopted the Waste Not Washington Act,making waste prevention and recycling the preferred method of managing solid waste and requiring jurisdictions to provide curbside recycling services to all residents living in urban areas. In King County,the division,cities,Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC), and solid waste collection companies worked together to launch a coordinated system for curbside collection of recyclables throughout the region.Working together over the last almost 30 years,both the public and private sectors have taken the region well beyond curbside recycling by creating myriad programs and services that foster the recycling and reuse of materials that might otherwise be thrown away and,more importantly,that prevent waste from being created in the first place. Since the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan was adopted,the collection system in the region has evolved significantly.The number of materials that can be recycled or processed for recycling and reuse has increased, technologies for collecting materials have improved,and participation in curbside recycling has continued to climb. Along with the growth of recycling in the region,however,comes issues that could potentially impact how much and what materials are recycled.Since inception of the waste reduction and recycling programs,markets and processing capacity for materials have fluctuated.Recent issues such as China's restrictions on multiple materials markets, contamination of recyclables and organics,and almost reaching local capacity to process organic materials,are testing the system's resilience.Working through these challenges with the cities and local haulers and processors will ultimately strengthen recycling,collection and processing in the region. Two key developments have added to the increase of materials collected T. ,a in single-family residential curbside recycling in the region. First is the - transition to commingled (or single-stream) collection.Since 2001, the collection companies have transitioned to commingled recycling, whereby all the recyclable materials are placed in one large cart for r curbside pickup. A second development is the addition of food scraps and food-soiled paper to yardwaste collected curbside.In 2001,the division began working with cities and collection companies to phase in curbside collection of food scraps and food-soiled paper in the yard waste (organics)cart.Compostable food scraps and food-soiled paper,which currently make up about one-third of the waste disposed by single-family residents,include all fruit,vegetable,meat,dairy products,pastas,grains, breads,and soiled paper used in food preparation or handling (such as paper towels).Food and yard waste,either separated or commingled, are referred to as organics. Nearly 100 percent of single-family customers who subscribe to garbage collection now have access to curbside food scrap collection.Only Vashon Island and the Skykomish and Snoqualmie Food scraps can be collected in small Pass areas,which house less than one percent of the county's residents, containers lined with compostable bags to do not have this service. make it easier to recycle 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 4-1 Att A Page 83 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 In addition to these major developments,programs such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental DesignT" and Built Green"are encouraging the building community to focus on waste prevention,recycling,and reuse of construction and demolition debris and helping to stimulate markets for the recycling and reuse of construction and demolition materials. In the 1980s,projections indicated that with the growing population and economy in the region,the amount of garbage that residents of King County would throw away would continue to climb steeply.Through the efforts of the county and area cities,businesses,and individual citizens,the amount of garbage disposed per resident per week dropped from 35 pounds in the 1980s to 15.2 pounds in 2014—a reduction of almost 57 percent.This reduction in disposal has contributed to extending the life of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill (Cedar Hills) by more than 20 years. Yet even with the increased recycling and waste prevention seen over the years,recent waste characterization studies conducted by the division indicate that about 70 percent of all materials disposed in the landfill are resources that could have been recycled or reused.As discussed in this chapter,identifying what these materials are and who generates them can help us determine where future efforts should be focused to achieve ongoing improvements. Concentrating efforts on a particular class of waste generator(e.g.,residential or business)or commodity type can yield measurable results. Four categories of information,discussed in detail herein,can be used to evaluate the current status of waste prevention and recycling efforts and help develop strategies that will lead to future improvements: 1.Waste prevention programs achieving results in the region. 2. Recycling and disposal rates by type of waste generator(discussed in Chapter 3,Forecast and Data),including: • Single-family(up to 4 units) and multi-family residents(in some cities may include townhomes), • Non-residential generators,such as businesses,institutions,and government entities, • Self-haulers,both residents and businesses,who bring materials to division transfer facilities,and • Generators of construction and demolition debris. 3.Types and quantities of recyclable or reusable commodities that remain in the waste stream,such as food scraps, clean wood,metals,and paper. 4.The status of markets for recyclable materials,availability of take-back options for used products,and opportunities to partner with private-sector businesses,national coalitions,and other jurisdictions to effect change. Information from these four categories was used to shape the goals and recommended actions presented in this chapter.To set the stage,this chapter begins with a description of the benefits of recycling and a discussion of our regional goals for the future. From there the focus moves to ways to sustain the momentum by looking at additional waste prevention,resource conservation,recycling,and product stewardship opportunities.The chapter concludes with a discussion of the status and challenges of collection by customer type. Benefits of Recycling Efforts The regional commitment to recycling has many benefits—financial,social,and environmental.Financial benefits are probably the most immediate for many county residents and businesses.Convenient recycling services not only provide an alternative to the higher cost of disposal,but also provide a long-term significant cost savings for ratepayers by increasing the lifespan of Cedar Hills.As discussed in Chapter 6,Landfill Management and Solid Waste Disposal,Cedar Hills landfill is a more cost-effective means of disposal than the other disposal alternatives currently 4-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 84 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 available.After Cedar Hills reaches capacity and closes,minimizing the amount of waste that requires disposal will translate directly into lower fees for King County ratepayers. The social benefits of recycling can be described in terms of economic growth and job creation.Materials diverted from Cedar Hills for recycling must be sorted,processed,and transported.The 2016 Recycling Economic Information (REI) Report(EPA,2016) includes information about the recycling jobs,wages, 111 III and tax revenue benefits.The report shows MC that recycling and reuse of materials creates dit jobs,while also generating local and state tax revenues. In 2007,recycling and reuse V. activities in the United States accounted for: • 757,000jobs, • $36.6 billion in wages,and • $6.7 billion in tax revenues. This equates to 1.57jobs for every 1,000 tons of materials recycled.Construction and demolition debris recycling provides the largest contribution to all three categories (job,wage,and tax revenue),followed by The Recology Store is a place to both recycle items and to purchase items ferrous metals and non-ferrous metals such made from recycled materials(Photo courtesy of Recology CleanScapes) as aluminum. The positive environmental benefits of recycling are local and ultimately global.Environmental benefits are focused in two primary areas,both of which have wide-reaching and long-term impacts. First,the release of pollutants emitted during the production and disposal of products is decreased,reducing the potential for harm to human health and the environment.Second,savings in energy use and associated reduced greenhouse gas emissions will result from decreased demand to process virgin materials into products,which also contributes to a healthier planet. Figure 4-1 illustrates a circular supply loop.The figure graphically shows the opportunities,values,and benefits of organics recycling in King County. Goal and Targets The goal and targets for waste prevention and recycling were established through extensive discussions with the division's advisory committees:the Solid Waste Advisory Committee(SWAG) and the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee(MSWMAC).The countywide goal and targets are intended to improve the effectiveness of established waste prevention and recycling efforts.The recommended actions for implementation presented at the beginning of this chapter were developed to provide general strategies for meeting the goal and targets and to identify the agency or agencies that would lead those efforts.The recommended actions are intended to serve as a guideline for the county and cities.They do not preclude other innovative approaches that may be implemented to help achieve the goal and targets. Factors other than waste prevention and recycling programs and services can increase or decrease the overall amount of waste generated.For example,the 2007 economic recession resulted in significant,unanticipated reductions in garbage collected,stemming primarily from the drop in consumer spending and business activity in the region.When establishing the goal and targets and measuring success in meeting them,it is important to consider the economy, policy changes,and other factors that may be in play. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-3 Att A Page 85 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 4-1 Organics: Opportunities, values, and benefits in King County Food, yard, and wood wastes: Organics recycling retains useful materials in the economy,creates newjob opportunities,converts a would-be waste into beneficial, Opportunities, values, and marketable products for farmers and gardeners,reduces the need for petroleum-based chemicals and fertilizers,improves nutrient benefits In King County recycling,and reduces the impacts from disposal. 2015 To Landfill 341,200 tons ' (approximately 48%) We reduced GHG emissions by 3,730 MTCO2e*by landfilling Represents$11.5 million in economic,environmental and health costs Portion Organics in the landfill produce 1 Willi . returns to methane,most of which is production captured and converted to natural gas. _ Collection TO . - To To To Products food banks farms from Organics to feed people to feed Processing livestock -Current- 10,000 tons soil-building Conservative estimate of mulch,compost,fertilizer surplus,perishable food energy rescued by hunger fuels,heat relief organizations. construction materials engineered wood Processing -Potential- animal feed,soap,and To Resource Recovery others 361,000 tons (approximately 52%) We reduced GHG emissions by 67,680 MTCO2e by composting Nearly all organics currently collected for processing go to composting facilities. Other processing technologies for organics include anaerobic digestion,biochar,and co-digestion with biosolids. *metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent 4-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o18 Att A Page 86 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste Prevention and Recycling Goal and Targets • AIM Achieve Zero Waste of Resources-i.e.,eliminate the disposal of materials with economic value-by 2030 through a combination of efforts in the following order of priority:waste prevention and reuse;product stewardship,recycling,and composting,and beneficial use. Waste generation rates to be achieved by 2030 Per Capita-20.4 pounds/week This target addresses residential waste from single-and multi-family homes. Per Employee-42.2 pounds/week This target addresses waste from the non-residential sector. Waste Dis ts • achieved by 2030 Reductions in disposal over time indicate an increase in waste prevention and/or recycling. Per Capita-5.1 pounds/week This target addresses residential waste from both single-and multi-family homes. Per Employee-4.1 pounds/week This target addresses waste from the non-residential sector. PreventionWaste • Establishing waste prevention targets and measuring success in achieving them is a challenge,because data quantifying the amount of waste not generated is difficult to obtain.However,by tracking overall waste generation(tons of material disposed+tons recycled)over the years,King County can attempt to identify regional trends in waste prevention.A decline in waste generation means that the overall amount of materials disposed or recycled,or both,has been reduced.The county also uses data from reuse and repair,building salvage, commercial food waste prevention grants,catalog/junk mail/phone book opt-outs,and material efficiencies spurred by product stewardship,to help determine whether waste prevention progress is being made. Recycling Target Recycling will continue to be an important strategy to reduce the disposal of solid waste.The recycling goal combines single-family,multi-family,non-residential,and self-haul recycling activity. It addresses the amount of waste being diverted from disposal at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill to recycling.It does not include construction and demolition debris(which have separate recycling goals),or other wastes,such as car bodies, which are not typically handled through the county system. In 2015,the overall recycling rate for the county was 54 percent. The goal for this planning period reflects the estimated recycling rate achievable if the recommended strategies in this plan are fully implemented (see Figure 4-3). Overall interim recycing goal: 70 percent 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 4-5 Att A Page 87 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 -o—a—o- What is Your Recycling Rate? It Depends on What You Count. "—Currently,there are no state or national standards for what should be counted in the"recycling rate" for a city or county.As a result,recycling rates reported by various jurisdictions may include different materials.For example,the recycling rate reported by some jurisdictions includes many materials that are not managed as a part of the county's system,so they are not included in establishing the county's recycling rate.This includes construction and demolition debris,asphalt and concrete, auto bodies,and biosolids.Many of these materials are very heavy and can considerably increase a recycling rate based on tons.In addition,some jurisdictions add percentage points to their recycling rate to account for the estimated success of their waste prevention efforts. The division has chosen to calculate King County's recycling rate based on the known amount of materials diverted from disposal at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill.As such,it does not include materials such as construction and demolition debris or car bodies that are handled largely by the private sector.Neither does the division include any estimate of waste prevention,primarily because of the lack of measurable data. For example,based on the definition above,the county's recycling rate in 2014 was 52 percent. Adding recycled asphalt and concrete would raise the calculated rate to approximately 62 percent. The rate would have been higher still if hard-to-measure materials such as car bodies and land clearing debris were added. Given the various methods for calculating a recycling rate,it is important to understand what materials are being counted before comparing rates across jurisdictions. Figure 4-2. Recycling rate over time 100% 90% 80% foal 70% 60% 50% 40% National Average Recycling Rate (2014) = 35% 30% 20% Regional Commitment to Single Stream Recycling 10% 0% 19901995 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112012 2013 2014 2015 4-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 88 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 As can be seen in Figure 4-2,the recycling rate has stalled,even as waste generation has increased in recent years.The role of individual cities will be critical in reaching our countywide waste prevention and recycling goal and targets.The way in which each city contributes to the overall goal and targets,however,may vary depending on the city's demographic make-up and other factors.For example,a city with a large concentration of apartments and condominiums might focus more efforts on programs for multi-family residents. Communities with primarily single-family homes , w might focus education and promotion on food scrap recycling for their residents. Another factor cities may consider is the make-up of their business(or non-residential) sectors.Cities with many restaurants,grocers,or other food- -40 related businesses might look at ways to promote ..w the recycling of food scraps or to partner these businesses with local food banks to donate surplus food to those in need.Similarly,cities with booming construction activity may want to take advantage of markets for the recycling and reuse of construction and demolition materials. Westwood Help Stop Food Waste campaign Likewise,the county will consider the make-up of the unincorporated area in which to focus waste prevention and recycling efforts. The county and the cities lead by example to improve waste prevention and recycling in their respective operations, at their facilities,and at sponsored events,for instance: • Some cities have held their own zero waste events and picnics, • The county and many cities collect food scraps and food-soiled paper at their offices and associated sites,and • The county enacted an ordinance to purchase copy paper that is 100 percent recycled content and reduce paper use by 20 percent. Figure 4-3 provides an example of how the region could reach a 70 percent recycling goal by collectively implementing mandatory recycling programs. Figure 4-3. One approach of regional cooperation toward 70% recycling goal using collective mandatory actions 1.0% I f0.5% A � ngle[ A [ amily 2.2% Single Every ° Multi Family Mandatory Other 2.5/o 1.8% Non- Family Separation Week Self-Haul Residential Carpet, Collection 3.2% Tires, Multi Mandator Separation Recycling 4.5% I Y p Y 9 Mattresses, Single Family Non Family Mandatory Asphalt, Separation Shingles, Residential Wood, Gypsum Metal, Mandatory Separation Food Cardboard, Paper,Yard Waste 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-7 Att A Page 89 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Tools Used to Meet the Recommended Goal and Targets The division and the cities have various tools at their disposal to promote waste prevention and increase recycling. Table 4-1 below identifies these tools and cites some of the successes achieved through their use. Table 4-1. Examples of successes achieved using various tools Tool Application Successes New transfer facilities are being designed with dedicated areas for Establishing the collection and recyclable materials such as yard waste,clean wood,and scrap metal. processing infrastructure is always the first step.It can be accomplished Approximately 99 percent of single-family curbside collection customers through enhanced curbside collection have access to collection service for food scraps and food-soiled paper, Infrastructure services,additional recycling options along with the yard waste. at transfer facilities,and partnerships with private-sector processing facilities Through E-Cycle Washington electronics manufacturers have developed a and manufacturers/retailers,e.g.,to statewide network of locations for recycling televisions,computers,and develop take-back programs. monitors.Likewise LightRecycle Washington established a network to collect mercury-containing lights. The division's Green Tools team provides education,resources,and technical Educational programs and targeted assistance on how to manage construction and demolition debris as a advertising play a key role in initiating resource rather than a waste. Education and new programs and sustaining the Many cities provide assistance to businesses to establish and maintain promotion momentum of existing programs. These efforts can be tailored to specific recycling programs.EnviroStars Green Business Program is a free program waste generators or materials. that offers rebates,resources,and incentives to businesses who take action to protect the environment and employee health and safety.Bellevue, Kirkland and King County are founding members. Incentives encourage recycling. For example,in a pay-as-you-throw To encourage waste prevention and recycling,curbside garbage collection (or variable rate)type program,if fees increase with the size of garbage can that customers subscribe customer generates less garbage,they to creating a"pay as you throw"(or variable rate)system.In addition, Incentives need a smaller garbage container,which embedding recycling in the rate can also act as an incentive. means a lower charge on their garbage bill.Incentives can also take the form Some cities provide kitchen containers and sample compostable bags to of give-away item that makes waste encourage residents to recycle their food scraps. prevention and recycling easier. 4-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 90 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Tool Application In order to discourage disposal of yard waste,its disposal in curbside garbage has been prohibited since 1993. Mandates that restrict the disposal of In 2005,fluorescent lights and many electronics were prohibited from specific materials have proven effective disposal at King County transfer stations to encourage the recycling of in increasing recycling,particularly in these items and use ofthe Take It Back Network Mandates instances where there is a viable and http://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/programs/take-it-back. developed recycling market for those materials.Mandates can be legislated aspx. at the local,state,or federal level,or To increase recycling,the division requires self-haulers to separate their implemented through city contracts. materials at county transfer stations.Starting in 2018,cardboard,metal, yard waste,and clean wood is banned from disposal at transfer stations that provide recycling services for these materials. Enforcement of program rules ensures The construction and demolition debris program employs a King County Enforcement that materials are recycled or disposed sheriff to enforce the recycling and disposal rules for construction and of properly. demolition materials.Outreach and progressive fines are issued to violators to encourage them to learn how the materials should be handled. Partnerships enable a program to Product stewardship efforts rely on partnerships to implement programs. be amplified by bringing in other Partnerships The division routinely partners with other organizations to further product organizations or agencies to assist with stewardship goals through the Northwest Product Stewardship Council. the program The successful diversion of residential yard waste from disposal exemplifies the effective use of four of these tools. First,an infrastructure was created to make it easy to separate yard waste from garbage.Curbside collection programs were implemented in phases across the county,easy-to-use wheeled collection containers were provided to residents,and private-sector businesses began turning the collected yard waste into compost for building healthy soils. Promotions were used to inform residents of � � the availability of curbside collection as the service was phased in.Educational campaigns were launched to teach citizens how to compost yard waste from their own yards for use as a soil amendment. Because the cost of collecting yard waste for composting was less than the cost of disposal in the garbage,residents had an incentive to subscribe to yard waste collection service.Many cities provided an additional Food:Too Good to Waste campaign shares information W"»g with consumers about how to purchase and store food to minimize waste 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-9 Att A Page 91 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 incentive by including yard waste collection as part of their basic package of collection services at the curb. Finally, mandates were passed by the cities and the county to prohibit residents from disposing of yard waste in the garbage wherever separate curbside yard waste collection was available.The resulting collection system for yard waste successfully recycled almost 96 percent of the yard waste disposed by single-family residents in 2015. Taking a Sustainable Materials Management Approach The following discussion describes a different way to look at the waste prevention and recycling programs and activities already in place.It describes the advantages of a sustainable materials management approach that encompasses the full life-cycle of materials:design and manufacturing,use and reuse,and end-of-life. Figure 4-4 graphically depicts the sustainable materials management approach.This approach has been adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) as well as the Washington State Department of Ecology in the last update of the state solid waste plan (Ecology 2015).Sustainable materials management still focuses on recycling and disposal,but by including production,design,use,and reuse,it provides an opportunity to identify more resilient, sustainable ways to design products that prioritize durability and recyclability,and use less energy,water,and toxics. Figure 4-4. Materials life cycle Source:Moving Washington Beyond Waste and Toxics,2075 • • r r • 4-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 92 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Decisions to reduce waste can be made at several critical stages in a product's life cycle,helping to develop a circular supply loop: • When manufacturers decide what goods to produce,how to design them,how to produce them,and how to package them, • When consumers decide whether and what to purchase,and • When consumers adopt ways to use and reuse products more efficiently. The following sections provide examples of programs in the different phases of sustainable materials management. Design and Proauciion Food:Too Good to Waste-This program educates consumers on ways to prevent wasting food.When food is wasted,it also wastes all the water and energy used to produce,package and transport it from the farm to table. In addition,about 33 percent of the single-family garbage disposed at Cedar Hills is food,which significantly reduces landfill capacity and life. Green Schools Food Waste Reduction and Food Share-The King County Green Schools Program assists schools and school districts to reduce wasted food through a number of strategies: • Encourage students to take what they will eat and eat what they take, • Set up cafeteria share tables on which students may place or take unopened,packaged foods and drinks from the school lunch program,and • Donate unopened,packaged items and uneaten whole fruits that cannot be re-served to students. The goals of the School Food Share program are to minimize wasted foods and beverages and safely distribute unwanted items from school lunch programs to local food banks and meal programs. use ano reuse Threadcycle is a public education campaign sponsored by King County and Seattle Public Utilities that encourages residents to donate used clothing,shoes, } and linens for reuse or recycling. Local N ' thrift stores and other organizations are partners in the program and will take all clothing,shoes,and linens regardless of condition (except items that are wet,mildewed,or contaminated with hazardous materials). The EcoConsumer public outreach program sponsors Repair Groups and Repair Group event provides an opportunity for residents to bring in broken events. Each repair event or group items for repair operates differently,based on the needs of the local community. It might be a one-time event,or they may be held every few months. People can bring to these events household items including small furniture,small appliances,personal electronics,and clothing that need to be repaired.Experienced all-purpose fixers and sewing fixers will work on the items,and can also help residents to learn to do their own repair. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 93 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste Prevention, Recycling and Climate Change The purchase,use,and disposal of goods and services by King County residents,businesses,and governments are associated with significant greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions.Emissions can occur at all stages of a product's life-from resource extraction,farming,manufacturing,processing, transportation,sale,use,and disposal.In 2008,consumption-related GHG emissions in King County totaled more than 55 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents(MTCO2e)-more than double the emissions produced within the county's geographic boundaries(King County 2012). As a major employer and service provider in the region,King County government is also a major consumer of goods and services.These goods and services-especially construction-related services-account for 270,000 MTCO2e,or about 42 percent of the County's operations-related GHG emissions(King County 2012). Residents,businesses,and governments can reduce GHG emissions associated with goods and services by choosing sustainable options,reducing the amount they purchase,reusing and repairing goods when possible,and recycling after use.King County is involved in these efforts through the solid waste management services and procurement efforts that the county provides,as well as through the county's efforts to educate residents and businesses about ways to use less and recycle more.The county is also taking a number of steps to reduce the environmental footprint of the products used in government operations and to reuse previously wasted resources. Recycling outreach-The Solid Waste Division's Recycle More-It's Easy to Do campaign promotes basic recycling of curbside materials,food scraps and yard waste.Other programs that support increased recycling and waste prevention include the Green Schools Program,which supports conservation in schools. Recycling infrastructure-In King County in 2010,about 832,000 tons of recyclable materials were collected by private hauling companies at the curb and about 10,000 tons were collected at King County transfer stations.Turning this waste into resources resulted in the reduction of approximately 1.6 million MTCO2e of GHG emissions. Reusing resources-King County is helping develop,expand,and support markets for reused and recycled products.The LinkUp program has expanded markets for recyclable and reusable materials such as asphalt shingles,mattresses,and textiles.The EcoConsumer program has expanded reuse by promoting and supporting tool lending library projects in the county. End-of-Life Management Product stewardship is a life-cycle approach that is being implemented at the state,national and international levels. In practice,the product manufacturers-not government or ratepayers-take responsibility for their products"cradle to cradle"This means that manufacturers are given the authority to finance and provide for the collection,recycling and/or proper management of their products at the end of the product's life cycle. 4-12 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 94 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 The division is on the steering committee of the Northwest Product Stewardship Council (NWPSC)and has been participating in the development of product stewardship strategies for commodities that contain toxic materials or are difficult and expensive to manage,such as paint,carpet,mercury thermostats,rechargeable batteries,mattresses, junk mail,and telephone books. The division and NWPSC were instrumental in getting state legislation adopted to implement the E-Cycle Washington and LightRecycle Washington extended producer responsibility programs.Both programs provide drop-off sites for consumers to take their electronics and mercury-containing lights.The division also worked to get a secure medicine return program implemented in King County.The program started in February 2017,and has approximately 100 locations where residents can securely dispose of unused medications. What do I do with...?Hundreds of thousands of visitors use this application annually to find recycling,reuse,and disposal options. Businesses and organizations maintain their listing of the materials and products they recycle,reuse, or dispose of as a requirement of being included as a partner on this high traffic division website.One of the oldest recycling databases in the country,What do I do with...? has evolved over almost twenty years from a printed paper directory to a modern,mobile friendly application.The most searched-for materials are consistently:Appliances, Batteries,Construction/Demolition Debris,Electronics,and Furniture.The division constantly seeks to refine and improve the What do I do with...?website,which currently provides information on over 100 materials. Turning Wastes to Resources In 2004, King County adopted"Zero Waste w _ v of Resources"as a principle designed to � eliminate the disposal of materials with economic value.Zero Waste does not Aft mean that no waste will be disposed;it proposes that maximum feasible and a1 r cost-effective efforts be made to prevent, reuse,and reduce waste.The division t has been taking steps to eliminate the disposal of materials that have economic value and for which there are viable markets. King County's list of designated recyclables is defined and updated by Ecology's annual statewide survey of materials that have been recycled in Recida Mas Facilitadores or facilitators of recycling teach recycling and Washington.The current list is shown in composting basics at a community event in King County Table 4-2: 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-13 Att A Page 95 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 4-2. Designated recyclables Category Includes Carpet and Pad Carpet and pad remnants. Clean Wood Unpainted and untreated wood,including wood from construction and demolition projects,and pallets. Recyclable and non-recyclable materials that result from construction,remodeling,repair or demolition Construction and Demolition Debris of buildings,roads,or other structures and requires removal from the site of construction or demolition. Construction and demolition debris does not include land clearing materials such as soil,rock,and vegetation. Electronics Includes audio and video equipment,cellular telephones,circuit boards,computer monitors,printers and peripherals,computers and laptops,copier,and fax machines,PDAs,pagers,tapes and discs,and televisions. Furniture Includes mattresses and box springs,upholstered and other furniture,reusable household and office goods. Glass Clean glass containers and plate glass'. Clean ferrous and non-ferrous metals,including tin-plated steel cans,aluminum cans,aerosol cans,auto Metal bodies,bicycles and bicycle parts,appliances,propane tanks,and other mixed materials that are primarily made of metal. Moderate risk waste from households and small quantity commercial generators,including antifreeze, Moderate Risk Waste household batteries,vehicle and marine batteries,brake fluid,fluorescent lights,oil-based paint, thermometers and thermostats,used oil,and oil filters. Food scraps and food-soiled paper;fats,oils,and grease(FOG);biodegradable plastic kitchenware and bags'; Organics yard waste,woody materials under 4 inches in diameter;and stable waste(animal manure and bedding). Other Materials Includes latex paint,toner and ink cartridges,photographic film,tires,and other materials reported as recycled to the Department of Ecology in response to annual recycling surveys. Paper All clean,dry paper including printing and writing paper,cardboard,boxboard,newspaper,mixed paper,and aseptic and poly-coated paper containers. Plastic All clean,single-resin plastic numbers 1 through 7,including containers,bags,and film(wrap). Textiles Includes rags,clothing and shoes,upholstery,curtains,and small rugs. 1 Plate glass is not accepted in curbside programs. 2 Biodegradable plastic products must be approved by organics processing facility receiving the material. 4-14 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 96 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 While the list of recyclable materials is extensive,available markets and infrastructure can vary from region to region. The division prioritizes materials for recycling in King County based on four key factors: • The amount present in the waste stream, • The ability to handle the material-both collection and processing, • Viable and sustainable markets for the material,and • Environmental considerations. These factors are also used to determine the appropriate method for capturing the materials,i.e.,through curbside collection or at county transfer facilities.The division may also consider other technologies such as anaerobic digestion or demonstration projects of other evolving technologies that promote resource recovery as ways to recycle or reuse materials.Since the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan was issued,the list of materials that are being recycled has grown substantially. In 2017,over 931,000 tons of solid waste were disposed at Cedar Hills.As shown in Figure 4-5,at least limited options in the market exist for the recycling of about 70 percent of the materials disposed. Figure 4-5. Recycling potential of materials disposed in 2015 62% Readily Recyclable Limited Recyclabitiy 7 . Not Recyclable For years,the Pacific Northwest has relied almost exclusively on exporting recyclable paper and plastics to China for processing.In early 2018,however,China made the specification for contamination so low(0.5 percent)that it is extremely difficult to meet,essentially banning the import of 24 recyclable commodities,including unsorted paper and mixed#3-#7 plastic. Recyclable materials entering recycling facilities may be contaminated for a variety of reasons,including commingling the materials in one bin,new packaging types,and resident confusion.Some materials being collected as part of the approved recyclables list have no markets,contaminate other valuable recyclable material,and/or create problems in the processing system (examples include plastic bags,poly-coated paper,cartons and aseptic packaging).China's ban is intended to crack down on illegal smuggling of foreign waste brought in under the guise of recycling,improve environmental quality,and reduce the volume of contaminated recyclables legally brought into the country. In response,agencies,cities,and haulers in King County have formed the Responsible Recycling Task Force(Task Force).The Task Force will identify common ground for advancing recycling given China's restrictions on acceptable recyclables,focusing on short-,mid-and long-term actions.Tenants of responsible recycling include: 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste 2wanagementPlan-july2018 4-15 Att A Page 97 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Focus on the quality and quantity of recyclables,including reducing contamination, • Use consistent and harmonized messaging across the region, • Prioritize domestic processing and markets for recyclables(including the social justice and environmental impacts of export), • Create domestic demand for recycled feedstock, • Understand that responsible recycling is not free,and • Shift to measure recyclables that are made into new products. While this issue presents a policy challenge for the region,it offers an opportunity to improve on recycling in the region,reeducate the public on recycling best practices,reduce contamination,and reinforce waste prevention messaging. Priority Materials The following sections describe priority materials identified by the division for recycling through curbside collection and at county transfer facilities. Priority Materials for Curbside Collection Over time,new materials that can be efficiently and cost-effectively captured for recycling are added to curbside collection programs.Adding materials for curbside collection requires sufficient infrastructure for collection and processing,and viable and sustainable end use markets.Standardizing the materials collected across the county simplifies recycling education,reduces confusion among consumers as to what is recyclable,and increases collection efficiency.However,all materials listed as priorities are not required to be recycled in all city programs. When the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan was adopted,materials collected at the curb included newspaper,cardboard,mixed paper,plastic bottles,tin and aluminum cans,glass bottles and jars,and yard waste. Materials added since that time include food scraps and food-soiled paper;aerosol cans;small scrap metal;plastic jugs and tubs;plastic plant pots,trays,and clamshells;plastic and paper drink cups;and aseptic containers. Organics More than one-third of what gets disposed at Cedar Hills landfill is food scraps and food-soiled paper.Collection and processing of these food scraps is critical to meet the county's ambitious waste diversion targets and climate change goals. There is also a growing effort to capture a large portion of the food scraps that are still considered to be edible. A recent division study of service management businesses and restaurants in King County(Cascadia 2017b) estimated that approximately three-quarters of the food scraps these businesses generated was edible food. Significant opportunities remain to reduce and prevent the tons of food scraps that are disposed. Commercial haulers throughout King County offer organics collection to both residential and commercial customers. Nearly all single-family households(99 percent) in King County have access to curbside organics collection that includes food scraps and food-soiled paper products.Unpackaged food scraps and approved compostable paper products can be collected along with yard waste in the same containers. King County and many cities have implemented public education and outreach campaigns to promote and increase participation in food scrap 4-16 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 98 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 diversion through curbside organics collection.The division also funded a grant program to promote commercial food scraps recycling.While participation rates appear to be increasing,there remains room for improvement. Challenges to food scraps collection include customer access(such as at multi-family residential units where organics collection is not required or offered by property management),participation levels in diversion programs,political and institutional barriers,and the level of contamination of the organics collected.As collection of organics increases it will be essential to ensure adequate regional processing capacity and reduced contamination of material.The division is actively working with regional partners to: Engage in long-range planning to increase organics processing capacity, Encourage greater use of compost,and Encourage operational changes at processing facilities to mitigate impacts on the surrounding community. Priority Materials for Collection at King County Transfer Facilities The division has identified several priority materials to collect at all transfer stations once they are renovated or replaced: • Yard and wood waste, • Cardboard, • Clean wood (not treated or painted),and • Scrap metal. Some materials designated for curbside collection and/or as priority materials for transfer station collection are also collected by private-sector businesses. R _ Markets for Recyclable Materials LinkUp — Expanding Markets for Recyclable and Reusable Materials Market development is an important strategy to ensure that recyclable materials are successfully moving from waste to resource.The division is working to expand markets for recyclable and reusable materials and facilitate the infrastructure that supports those markets,through , its LinkUp Program.Working with businesses,public agencies,and other organizations,LinkUp develops projects that address specific market barriers(from collection to processing to end-use)that prevent or restrict a material or product from moving up the value chain for ultimate reuse or use as a raw material for manufacturing new products. In recent years, LinkUp has conducted projects to improve markets for asphalt shingles,carpet,mattresses,compost,and textiles. Projects have supported efforts,such as the development of collection and Developing markets for asphalt shingles processing infrastructure for asphalt roofing shingles,carpet,and has been one focus of the LinkUp program. mattresses;establishment of the hot mix asphalt pavement market for Shown here are asphalt shingles used in asphalt shingles;expansion of the Take it Back Network to include latex paving roads paint,and promotion of the network to the public;public education to promote donation of damaged textiles for reuse or recycling;and demonstration of the use of compost for agricultural applications by King County farmers. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july2018 4-17 Att A Page 99 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 2015 and 2017 Market Assessments In 2015 and 2017,Cascadia Consulting Group conducted market assessments for the division that focused on commingled curbside recyclables,organics,electronics,film plastics,and construction and demolition materials (Cascadia 2015b and Cascadia 2017). First,Cascadia conducted a preliminary analysis and ranking of potential focus materials. Evaluation metrics included disposed tons,disposed volume,GHG emissions if recycled rather than landfilled,ability to influence the county's recycling rate,and market strength.Table 4-3 shows the results of the preliminary analysis and ranking. Table 4-3. Findings from 2015 and 2017 market assessments Overall Food and food-soiled paper* High Clean wood Textiles Film plastic(same score as textiles) Electronics(covered by E-Cycle) #3-7 plastics Mattresses*(same score as#3-7 plastics) Medium Clean(new)gypsum Electronics(not covered by E-Cycle) Asphalt Shingles* Carpet Treated wood Low Painted(demo)gypsum Tires *Materials for which the division is already engaging in market support through the LinkUp program. Cascadia then conducted"mini assessments"of the top six ranked materials,combining two categories of electronics, and excluding textiles and mattresses,for which the division already has market support efforts underway.Findings from these studies,which looked at the material supply for recycling,processing capacity,and current markets, included: • Markets for commingled curbside recyclables,including paper,plastics,glass,and metals were generally stable in 2015. However,China's 2018 implementation of their"National Sword"policy to restrict the importation of mixed paper and mixed#347 plastics has resulted in the immediate closure of a significant market for these recyclable materials.Annually,around 138,000 tons of these recyclable materials from King County that would normally go to China now need to be processed elsewhere.At this time,alternative export and domestic markets for mixed paper and mixed plastics are extremely limited.Food scraps and plastic film/wrap are the biggest contamination challenge in curbside commingled recycling. 4-18 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 100 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Almost all organic materials collected within the King County system are being converted into compost products,which are primarily used as soil amendments.Anaerobic digestion(a biological process that transforms organic waste into renewable energy,and in some situations,a useable residual by-product) is an emerging processing technology in the region.More organics processing capacity is likely needed if there are to be significant increases in food scraps and food-soiled paper composting in King County and surrounding regions(See Chapter 5 for more information about processing capacity).Market prices and sales of compost products are reported to be stable. Expanding agricultural compost markets is of interest. • Wood and plastic films have significant barriers to successful recycling.Wood markets are stable but weak and highly dependent on use as hog fuel.Barriers to plastic film recycling occur at all points of the supply chain. Grants to Cities _ - Waste Reduction and - - Recycling Grants M The division provides grant funds and technical assistance to cities to help -A -- further waste prevention and recycling programs and services within their communities. Each distributes million n rant funds -, � . 'UL Y g Y _ g to cities;these funds are supported by the solid waste tipping fee.All cities in the service area are eligible for the funds. Clean wood is collected at the Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station The formula for their allocation includes a base amount plus a percentage based on the city's population and employment. Currently,much of these grant funds is used by the cities to hold recycling collection events in their communities. The cities and the county may be able to phase out these collection events and use the funds in other ways that support waste prevention and recycling in their communities as enhanced recycling services are added at renovated transfer facilities,curbside collection for bulky items becomes more cost effective and widely available,and product stewardship programs begin to offer more options for recycling.The grant monies can be used to support a number of activities,including: • Encouraging and promoting waste reduction, • Continuing to implement and improve general recycling programs, • Improving opportunities for the collection of specific commodities,such as paper, • Improving opportunities for the collection and/or composting of organic materials, • Increasing the demand for recycled and reused products, • Fostering sustainable development through the promotion of sustainable building principles in construction projects, • Managing solid waste generated by public agencies in a manner that demonstrates leadership, • Broadening resource conservation programs that integrate waste prevention and recycling programs and messages,and • Providing product stewardship opportunities. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 4-19 Att A Page 101 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance Grants Ecology also supports waste prevention and recycling programs in King County through the Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance(formerly known as the Coordinated Prevention Grant) program. Funds are allocated within the county based on population.The division uses funds allocated to the unincorporated areas to support waste prevention and recycling efforts such as recycling collection events,yard waste and food scrap recycling,and natural yard care education and promotion.The cities also receive funds directly from Ecology to support their own waste prevention and recycling programs(applications are coordinated through the division). Competitive Grant Program .: In 2012,the division worked collaboratively with the cities to develop a new competitive grant '' program to fund innovative projects and services that further the waste prevention and recycling goals outlined in this Plan.Cities,commercial collection companies,and other entities,such as non-profit organizations or schools,would be eligible to apply for the grant program.The program has not been approved by the cities or funded through the solid waste rate,but the r division will continue to work with the cities to identify opportunities to initiate the new competitive grant program in the future. Cities use some of their grant money to hold recycling In the meantime,the division has initially funded collection events a small competitive grant program through the Solid Waste Division budget with the focus on commercial food waste.A program funded through the solid waste rate would extend reach and impact. Descriptions of the funded projects can be found online at: your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/garbage-recycling/commercial-grants.asp Sustainable Purchasing King County is also working to reduce the impacts of its operations by purchasing products that have recycled content and are more resource-efficient and durable.The Sustainable Purchasing Program provides county personnel with information and technical assistance to help them identify,evaluate,and purchase economical and effective sustainable products and services. The division will continue to provide technical assistance to cities by sharing contracts,specifications,and procurement strategies.Many cities in the county have also implemented environmentally preferable purchasing programs. Another strategy to increase sustainable purchasing is to provide training and education about the benefits of compost applications in parks and landscape projects,topdressing grass in parks,and stormwater management applications. 4-20 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 102 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Collection The remainder of this chapter looks at the current collection challenges and recommendations for improvement for three sectors of generators-single-family households,multi-family households,and non-residential customers, which include businesses,institutions,and government entities. For each sector,the issues may vary and present different challenges due to collection methods and the regulations by which they are governed.Construction and demolition debris is discussed separately at the end of this chapter because of the unique nature of collecting and processing these materials. Residential Collection The residential garbage collection system in King County is a well-established system that serves the region in a safe, efficient,and cost-effective manner.With the shift toward increased collection services for recyclables and organics, customers can choose to subscribe to smaller,less expensive collection cans for their garbage.Container sizes now range from the micro-can at 10 gallons to the mini-can at 20 gallons and on up to the large 90+gallon cart.The reduced fee for the smaller cans creates an incentive to generate less waste and divert as much material as possible to the recyclables or organics carts. Throughout King County,individual city contracts for collection of garbage,recyclables,and organics differ in a number of aspects.Cities have entered into contracts with the collection companies at different times and then renewed contracts as they have expired. Each time a contract is negotiated and renewed,the city may make adjustments to their services such as changing the range of materials being collected,the collection frequency, container types or sizes,fee structures,and more.Changes to services may also be negotiated for existing contracts. The varying collection standards among cities that have resulted from these changes over time have led to inconsistencies in regional education and messaging,confusion among customers,and difficulties in measuring and potentially attaining region wide goals. To illustrate the varying collection standards that currently exist,Table 4-4 presents a summary of single-family collection services by city and unincorporated area,showing the types of contracts held,the collection company serving the jurisdiction,container sizes offered,collection frequency,and fee structures.The recycling rates for each jurisdiction and unincorporated area,with and without organic materials,are also presented for comparison.The UTC cost assessment in Appendix A(Section 3.3) - provides additional information about the UTC-regulated and contracted companies. Working with the community and the hauler,the division is exploring the inclusion of Vashon/Maury Island in the service level standards,as well as other ways to improve recycling services provided curbside and at the transfer station.Skykomish and A truck picks up in a neighborhood (Photo courtesy of Republic Services) Snoqualmie Pass will not be included in the service level standards at this time because of their remote locations and low population densities. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-21 Att A Page 103 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 4-4. Summary of single-family collection for garbage, recycling, and organics in King County (owebio bulpnpxa) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N w N oN %O r� to n m N N M m 00 N N M O� 1� W O� V O� N N �/1 kO /1 a, a}ea bulp�(aaa N N V M N M M N M N M M N N M V M N M M N M M M M M N M � o a� (saluebao bulpnpul) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N.Va}ea bulp�(aaa M Ln I I ID C' mID Ln In ID I ID Ln Ln\D Ln ID v (HIAA/tsn:)/sq l) OV n M N V1 a\ N M N N V O �O lQ O M W O1 L M W W 7 lesods14 abegaeE N N N M N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N aa�abegaeE) ul papnpul SDIUe6a0 w V 'L. i aa�abegaeE) N ul papnIDUI 6UIID(Daa x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x (a a}u IAA) uol}aa1IOD Salueba0;o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 buanbaa Ll/9LOZ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a 3 aa, (Ile;-aawawns-bu!iAs) LL C uol1aaIIOD S:)lue6J0 JO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 4 �(4. auanbaa w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 J Ll/9LOZ V W 10 ADuanbaaj L l/9lOZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TJeD S:)IuebAO %A w a\ w a\ w w w w a\ w a w a\ w a\ w a\ w a\ w a\ w a\ w a\ N u+ paepue}S rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn V1 = 10 V tleD 6UIIDAD@d w rn m rn m Io m rn m rn m Io m rn m rn m rn w rn rn rn m rn m Io w Io paepue�S uol}aallo�abegaeE) �(ao�epueW x x x x x x x x x x x 0 a Din /}Deatu0D U UU � U U U U U U U v v v v v U v v U v v v 0 V w O d a HAuedw OD g w w w n n w Y w n n n w n n n n eaay pajeaodaoaulun Y Y ao uolplpsunf v Y ° o 3 v Y t v v O n a E Y E N @ O 3 f6 2` O N 7 v 7 Q Q o] m o] [o o] V V U 0 0 w w 2 Y Y Y Z Z Z d ¢ 4-22 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2oz8 Att A Page 104 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 � vv v v (s:)Iue6ao 6ulpnpxa) a w o v n o. (Nv n m r4 0, M v e v U @Jea 6UIIDADaa m m m m m ry m m ry M In ry ^ N o � = � � tC v CM (salue6ao bulpnpul) 0 = o ao m v m 3 v r4 O m m 10 ak 0 3 p e �,•- O area 6U11��(�aa w In 'n 'D N �n v a O v1 V N In o � N � v c = o v V (HIAA/jsna/sq0 e M a C) n m m 10 w ^ o v �o w ao rn z $ c Q �o O a ry ry ry ry ry ry ry m ry N ry ry m N lesods14 a6egae� 6 U aa�a6egae� ° o e v v a, E 3 u!papnpUI SDIUe6a0 x x x x v E e ° o v p a v +� x x x x x x x x x xv v c 3 _2 v a w '^ ui papnpUI 6UIIDADaa o a (aatulnn) e v ° v UOIIDaIIOD SDIUe6a0 JO 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 w w z z ADuanbaai ZI/910Z — Y a . o v (m (Ile;-aawwns-6ulads) ° U. uolIDalloDsDlue6a0JO2 2 0 0 z 2 0 2 0 w w z z v o e 4 ADuanbaai L1/910Z §ua o, g _ o -zw e V 0 0 B v o v O V UOIIDaIIOD 6UIIDADaa Ln R v CO v 0 2 0 0 z 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 z e v e N e c o 0 Jo�Duanbaai L 1/9102 w w w W w w w w w c c U e E c TaeD SDIUe6a0 e o o, v O o, k '0 \0 \0 '0N C N k O Y Nin paepuels rn rn rn rn z G\ rn G\ o. m G\ z z w � > e h � o ai v a R R taeD6UIIDADaa V a1 w w Ln v w w w w v a v t B a v o paepuels rn rn rn rn z rn rn rn rn rn rn z e U E c '� -C- -Z e UOI}aalIOD a6egaeE) Aaolepuevy x x x e a v v o a 0 N i1 a Din /JDeJTUOD v v u v v u > > > > > > v 0 W � U �(uedwOD w E a Y 2 2 2 2 2 v 23 c UOIID@IIOD 910Z u 2 2 2 2 2 8 .c z v � v v a v v 3 rCa ¢ to \ G B B O' eaay paIeAOdao�ulu� 6 d c a o 'u o Y 7 7 a U .O w .IO UOI DI S I.nf �nravvi ivi NYvi �n �Ho 2 } �nra vr31 YZOv �vO 0 uv v E ag ro s E E0o Ec E O O O ✓ eUi Lu .co vv co 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-23 Att A Page 105 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 As shown in Table 4-4,the single-family recycling rate varies significantly among the cities and unincorporated areas, ranging from 37 to 65 percent(combining organics and the curbside recyclables)with an average of 55 percent.While it would be difficult to identify a single factor or factors that will ensure a higher recycling rate,there are some factors that appear to lead to increased participation and amounts of waste diverted from disposal,as discussed in the following sections. Range of Materials Collected In addition to the materials identified for curbside collection in the last Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-newspaper,mixed paper,and cardboard;tin and aluminum cans;plastic bottles;glass bottles and jars;and yard waste-new materials have been added over time.These materials include food scraps and food soiled paper, aerosol cans,small scrap metal,plastic jugs and tubs,plastic plant pots,plastic trays and clamshells,drink/coffee cups, and aseptic cartons/containers (such as juice boxes).Some cities have added other materials for collection,such as electronics,fluorescent bulbs and tubes,and motor oil. Curbside collection,however,is not necessarily the most efficient and cost-effective way to capture every type of recyclable or reusable product.Some products cause problems for materials recovery facilities because of their size or composition,while others are better candidates for take-back programs by manufacturers and retailers to extract potentially harmful components and recycle other components. Examples of these types of materials and their particular challenges include the following: • Plastic bags and plastic wrap are prevalent in the waste stream,particularly residential.Collection of plastic bags in the recyclables cart creates a nuisance further down the line at the material recovery facilities.As the bags move through the facility they sometimes catch in and jam the sorting machinery,and they can blow around and cause litter problems. For these reasons,curbside collection may not be the best option for plastic bags and wrap at this time.More appropriate options for consideration may be an increased use of reusable shopping bags and the establishment or expansion of take-back programs at the retail level. For instance,the Wrap Recycling Action Program (WRAP),a national initiative,provides a network of drop-off locations for clean and dry plastic film,including wraps,bags and flexible packaging,to be recycled. • Electronic Products and Fluorescent Bulbs and Tubes Collecting these materials at the curb is complicated by the fact that some of them tend to break easily and - -- contain potentially hazardous _. n materials that must be safely disposed. In Washington p g State,legislation requires ., ** � manufacturers of computers, -. . "' • �� t � • .-' c. a • 'M monitors,and televisions to .� ,� r •` y �,�•q k ,� provide separate locations for free recycling of these items. '* V41 Handling electronics through F. • product stewardship ensures • ° that the various components, such as glass,plastic,and metals,are separated and recycled as appropriate and that any potentially Fluorescent tubes are collected at the Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station 4-24 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 106 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 hazardous materials are recycled or disposed in a safe and environmentally sound manner. Product stewardship efforts reduce costs to local governments and their ratepayers by eliminating the costs to recycle these products. Take-back programs have also been implemented for fluorescent bulbs and tubes.Cities such as Kent and Shoreline and have contracted with their recycling collection companies to develop a safe,convenient program for collecting fluorescent bulbs and tubes at the curb.The City of Bothell's garbage and recycling collection contract includes curbside collection of electronic products and fluorescent bulbs and tubes as well as collection at the The Recology Bothell store. Some cities offer collection of small appliances and home electronics not covered by Washington's current product stewardship laws. For appropriately sized products that do not contain hazardous materials,curbside collection is a viable and efficient option. • Polystyrene Foam-One type of plastic that is not recommended for residential curbside collection is expanded polystyrene foam,commonly known as Styrofoam,which includes clamshell containers for take-out foods and blocks of plastic that are used to package many electronics and other goods.These materials are light and bulky, can break easily into small pieces,readily mix with other materials causing contamination,and are difficult to separate out at the material recovery facilities. In addition,the quantity collected is so small that it takes a long time to collect enough of the material to ship to market.Although there are challenges to collecting expanded polystyrene foam packaging curbside,the City of Des Moines began offering its single-family residents this service in 2012. Block expanded polystyrene foam (not packing peanuts) is accepted and residents are asked to put the blocks in a clearly labeled plastic bag and place it next to their curbside recycling cart.This allows the expanded polystyrene foam blocks to be handled separately from the commingled recyclables.The cities of Issaquah and Seattle have taken another approach and banned the use of expanded polystyrene foam containers for take-out foods.Other cities,such as Kirkland and Redmond,have regular or semi-regular collection events to collect expanded polystyrene packaging. Size of Collection Container The size of the recycling collection cart can affect recycling success.Areas where most residential customers use smaller recycling carts have reported lower recycling rates and when larger carts have been provided the recycling rate has increased.As more materials are identified for commingled recycling,and food scraps are added to the yard waste cart,recyclables carts are getting larger and the size of garbage can to which customers subscribe should become smaller. Frequency of Collection Adjustments to the frequency of curbside collection for garbage,recyclables,and organics can also be used to influence recycling and disposal behaviors and reduce collection costs and truck traffic.Garbage collection across King County typically occurs on a weekly basis.This collection schedule has been driven,in part,by the presence of food scraps and other organics in the garbage that rapidly decompose and have the potential to lead to environmental or public health concerns.With separate collection of organics for recycling,there is an opportunity to modify weekly garbage collection to benefit ratepayers and to create a more environmentally sustainable system. One of the most important factors in determining the appropriate collection frequency for the various material streams,particularly for organics(yard waste and food scraps),is compliance with the public health and environmental standards in Title 10 of the Code of the King County Board of Health.To study the effects of changing the collection method and possibly the frequency of collection,in summer 2007 the division conducted a pilot 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-25 Att A Page 107 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Regulatory Changes Allow Adjustments in Collection Frequency Schedules After successful completion of the Renton pilot study,a variance to Title 10 of the Code of the King County Board of Health was approved to allow every-other-week collection of organics(with the yard waste)for single-and multi-family residents,as well as every-other-week collection of residential garbage.The variance applies as long as the following standards(excerpted directly from the variance) are met.During the next review of the Title 10 Health Code,these variances are scheduled to be adopted. Residential(Single-Family)Garbage Collection Residential garbage may be collected every other week provided that: • Garbage is contained in a provided cart. • A food scrap collection program is available and actively promoted to residents. • The garbage collection and food scrap collection services are offered on alternating weeks to ensure that customers have access to at least weekly disposal or composting options for problematic compostables. • Residents are instructed to bag all garbage before placing it in carts to reduce vectors,free liquids,and litter. Residential(Single-and Multi-family)Organics Collection(with yard waste) • When mixed with yard debris,residential food scraps may include all vegetative,meat,dairy products,pastas,breads,and soiled paper materials used for food preparation or handling; provided that all collected materials are picked up by haulers which deliver the mixed yard waste to a permitted transfer and/or permitted composting facility for serviced customers. • Combined food scraps and yard debris shall be collected no less frequently than every-other- week,year-round provided that there are no leachate generation,odor,or vector problems. • Combined food scraps and yard debris shall be collected in carts.Residents shall be instructed to place food scraps only in the cart provided to them.Any extra customer-provided cans or large paper bags shall contain only yard debris. • Compostable bags may be used to consolidate food scraps placed in carts if and only if the bags have been approved by the facility receiving the material for composting.Plastic bags shall not be used for yard/food debris. • Haulers shall make available a cart-cleaning or replacement service for customers with carts which have unacceptable residue or odor levels to avoid improper disposal of rinse water to storm drains,yards,etc.,and reduce the need for customers to self-clean their containers. • Educational and promotional materials from the county,city,and haulers shall inform residents about the benefits of recycling food scraps and soiled paper;and appropriate options for managing it,including the use of approved compostable bags;and appropriate options and restrictions for cleaning carts. 4-26 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 108 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Commercial/Multi-family Food Scraps Collection(without yard waste) • Food scraps shall be collected in leak-proof,contractor-provided containers with tightly- fitting lids. • Containers shall be kept clean through the use of contractor-cleaning,compostable bagging, compostable cart lining or boxing,or limiting the types of materials collected from a particular customer. • Containers shall be cleaned by the customer or the hauler immediately upon the request of City, County,or Public Health personnel. • Customers shall be informed of container cleaning restrictions(i.e.,proper disposal of rinse water and any residues from containers outside of storm drains,landscaping,etc.). • Customers shall be informed of what is not acceptable in containers and the need to keep container lids closed when not in use and inaccessible overnight. • Collection of commercial/multi-family food scraps shall occur weekly at a minimum.Any exception to the minimum weekly schedule will have to bejustified by information on a particular customer's food scrap composition,where it can be shown that less frequent collection can occur without leachate generation,odor,and vector problems. study in cooperation with the City of Renton,Waste Management(the collection company),and Public Health.The purpose of the study was to explore the public health and environmental impacts,customer responses,and effects on potential waste diversion that would result from changes in collection. In particular Public Health was concerned about the feasibility of collecting meat and bones every other week in the yard waste cart and changing garbage collection to less than weekly.To explore these concerns,approximately 1,500 Renton households participated in the six-month pilot study to look at two different collection schedules: • Every-other-week collection of all three solid waste streams-garbage,recyclables,and organics,and • Every-other-week collection of garbage and recyclables and weekly collection of organics. The pilot study showed positive results for both collection schedules tested.There were no negative health or environmental impacts observed,and customers were highly satisfied with the collection schedules and the container sizes provided to adjust for the shift in schedule.Study results indicated not only a 20 percent decrease in the amount of garbage disposed,but an overall reduction in the generation of garbage,recycling,and organics.An added benefit was the reduction in truck traffic and transportation costs with the less frequent collection cycles. As a result,the City of Renton rolled out a citywide program in January 2009 to offer every-other-week collection of garbage and commingled recyclables,with every week collection of organics. Renton is the first city in King County to provide every-other-week garbage collection as the standard collection service for single family households.By 2013,Renton's disposal per household had dropped by 23 percent. While other factors such as the economic downturn likely played a role in disposal reductions,data from all of King County over the same time period estimated a disposal drop of 8 percent,suggesting that every-other-week garbage is a significant tool to reduce disposal and increase recycling. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july2028 4-27 Att A Page 109 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Fee Structure Curbside Recycling Services: In nearly all areas of King County,households paying for garbage collection services also cover the embedded cost of recycling collection services. In most cases,unlimited amounts of recyclables can be set out. In contrast,the fee for garbage service varies depending on the number or size of containers each household sets out.A variation of this pay-as-you-throw system is to couple it with a linear rate structure in which there is no "bulk discount"for having a larger container and the price per gallon is the same across all service levels. Consequently,King County residents have a clear financial incentive to reduce the amount they dispose and increase the amount they recycle. Curbside Organics Services:Sixteen cities,comprising about 55 percent of the population in the county,have adopted rate structures that embed the cost of organics collection in the curbside garbage collection fee,providing a further incentive for residents to reduce disposal and maximize use of the recycling options for which they are paying. In 2016,the average pounds of garbage disposed per household in these cities was 12 percent lower than the average for the rest of King County. Curbside Collection of Bulky Items for Residents An ongoing issue with collection is finding the most efficient and cost-effective way to handle bulky waste—larger, individual items that do not fit in a garbage can or recycling cart.This type of waste includes recyclable items such as appliances,potentially reusable items such as furniture,and other large items that must be disposed. Bulky waste collection services are available from collection companies throughout the county;however,these services are not widely used. Residents may not use the service because it is expensive,ranging from $25 to$128 per item,with the possibility of additional charges '" for travel time and labor.Customers may also be unaware of the collection options available to them.The primary alternatives to bulky curbside collection are self-hauling the materials „r to transfer stations for disposal or recycling,or taking them to collection events sponsored by the county or the cities. Neither of these self- haul options is an efficient way of handling the materials because of the number of vehicle trips, the increased number of transactions at transfer �= stations,and the high cost of staging Bulky items are taken to a special recycling collection event collection events. The current recommendation is to work with collection companies and the UTC to explore options to increase the efficiency and reduce the price of curbside collection of bulky items.For example,the cost would be lower if a small charge were included in the regular garbage fee,and curbside collection days were regularly scheduled and promoted,thereby increasing the efficiency of the collection routes.Collection systems for bulky items should be designed,to the extent possible,to divert reusable items to charitable organizations for resale,reuse community organizations(Green Bee or Buy Nothing community groups), and recyclable items to processing facilities. 4-28 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 110 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Single-Family Residential Minimum Collection Standards Single-family collection services for garbage,recyclables,and organics are well established.As discussed earlier, however,there are many variations among the cities in the specific methods of collection and rate structures.The division has evaluated the factors that appear to lead to higher recycling rates and an increase in the diversion of materials from the garbage. Based on this evaluation,it is recommended that minimum collection standards be adopted by the cities and unincorporated areas to provide the optimal service level for reducing waste and increasing the diversion of recyclables and organics from disposal. Working with the community and the hauler,the division is exploring the inclusion of Vashon/Maury Island in . the service level standards,as well as ' other ways to improve recycling services -- provided curbside and at the Vashon Recycling and Transfer Station.Skykomish �+.. and Snoqualmie Pass will not be included i in the service level standards at this time because of their remote locations and low population densities. The minimum collection standards can be implemented as the county updates its service-level ordinance and jurisdictions ° amend their collection contracts (some of these targeted standards may not require Curbside collection (Photo courtesy of Recology CleanScapes) changes to contracts or the county's service-level ordinance).A description of the recommended collection standards follows in Table 4-5. Continuing education and promotion will also be important for increasing recycling and reducing wastes generated by single-family residents.The cities and the county will increase education and promotion to encourage the recycling of food scraps and food-soiled paper. In concert with the commercial collection companies,the cities and the county will also continue to focus promotions on the proper recycling of the standard curbside materials to increase participation and reduce contamination in the recycling containers. Financial incentives will also be explored through the fee structure for garbage and recyclables and grants to cities. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 4-29 Att A Page 111 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 4-5. Single-family minimum collection standards Garbage Recyclables Organics Required Mixed solid waste Newspaper,cardboard,mixed paper,and Yard debris Materials for polycoated paper Food scraps Collection* Plastic bottles,jugs,and tubs Food-soiled paper Tin and aluminum cans Glass bottles andjars Aseptic packaging Small scrap metal Container Type Containers or wheeled Wheeled carts Wheeled carts ca its Container Size Subscriptions available 90+gallon if collected every other week 90+gallons if collected every other week for various sizes Smaller size if collected more frequently or if Smaller size if requested by customer requested by customer Frequency of Minimum ofonce a Minimum of every other week Minimum of every other week Collection month Fee Structure Fee increases with Recyclables collection included in garbage fee Organics collection included in garbage fee container size Additional containers available at no extra charge Additional carts may be included in base fee or available at an extra charge Customers requesting smaller carts may be offered a reduced rate *Subject to status ofrecyclables on King County's Designated Recyclables List Multi-Family Residential Collection Multi-family recycling has not been as successful as single-family recycling.There are a number of contributing factors,including space constraints for collection containers and a higher turnover of residents and property managers.These factors make it difficult to implement standardized collection services and provide consistent recycling messaging to this diverse sector.Some local progress has been made,however,in developing consistent design standards to accommodate waste in multi-family complexes. In addition,in many areas of the county there is a trend in the construction of mixed-use buildings,which contain retail shops on the lower level and residential units above. 4-30 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 112 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Mixed-use buildings present somewhat similar challenges for recycling,including: • A lack of space for adequate garbage,recycling,and organics collection (often competing with parking needs and other uses), • A need for collaborative planning among property developers,garbage and recycling collection companies,and cities early in the development process to ensure that adequate space is designated for garbage,recycling,and organics containers in the building design,and • Different customer types,both residents and employees,with different recycling needs. Recycling could be increased substantially at multi-family complexes and mixed-use buildings by adopting minimum collection standards for multi-family collection.The multi-family standards vary somewhat from the single-family standards to account for differences in service structure.To improve recycling at mixed-use buildings,the cities and the county must consider both the multi-family collection standards and the recommendations for non-residential collection.A description of the recommended collection standards follows in Table 4-6. Table 4-6. Multi-family minimum collection standards Garbage Recyclables Organics Mixed solid waste Newspaper,cardboard,mixed paper,and Yard debris polycoated paper Food scraps Required Materials for Plastic bottles,jugs,and tubs Food-soiled paper Collection* Tin and aluminum cans Glass bottles andjars Aseptic packaging Small scrap metal Clearly mark Clearly mark containers indicating materials Clearly mark containers containers indicating acceptable for recycling.Information should indicating materials acceptable Required Informational Labeling materials that are include pictures. for organics container. garbage.Information Information should include should include pictures pictures Container Type Wheeled carts or Wheeled carts or dumpsters Wheeled carts or dumpsters dumpsters Container Size Subscriptions available Service equal to garbage service Subscriptions available for vari- for various sizes ous sizes Weekly,or more often Weekly or more often if needed Weekly or every other week Frequency of Collection if needed Fee based on container Recyclables collection included in garbage fee Subscription service available for Fee Structure size and/or collection an added fee frequency Additional containers available at no extra charge *Subject to status ofrecyclables on King County's Designated Recyclables List 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 4-31 Att A Page 113 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Increased education and promotion are needed to improve recycling at multi-family complexes. It will require concerted efforts on the part of many to standardize the collection infrastructure and provide ongoing education and promotion for property managers and residents alike. To further increase recycling in multi-family and mixed use buildings,the division, "No loll, in cooperation with other jurisdictions, property managers,and owners of multi- .rt r.. r family properties,collection companies and � � ,�� 'I other stakeholders,has conducted several i research and pilot studies(KCSWD 2014b and 2016b).The findings from these studies conclude that successful recycling depends on: :•* • Collection logistics:Effective programs place recycling containers for convenience,access,and ease of use;provide sufficient space and capacity for collection both inside and ` outside of the buildings;provide tools for collection,storage,and transport Recycling and garbage containers at an apartment complex.The signs of recyclables and organics from units detail what should be put in each bin to collection points;and clearly label collection containers. • Policies and regulations:Clear policies ensure that recycling is available and addresses issues such as contamination. Examples might be service level ordinances,city contracts that embed recycling in garbage rates,and building code requirements. • Education and outreach:Effective recycling and food waste collection in multi-family buildings hinges on education and outreach.Strategies such as door-to-door outreach,property manager trainings,and onsite assistance have been successful. In addition,education and outreach that addresses non-English speaking communities is crucial. Improving multi-family recycling will likely require,at a minimum,the following actions: • Clarify and strengthen building code requirements-The division's GreenTools program has been working collaboratively with cities to develop standards that can be used for multi-family buildings. If adopted,these standards will help ensure that enough space is designed to allow for recycling in future construction. • Research collection and demographic characteristics,complex by complex- Planning outreach strategies should begin with a careful look at language and other population demographics,collection infrastructure, tenant turnover rate,and other applicable characteristics of each complex.Outreach strategies must be comprehensive and flexible to fit the complex. Customized combinations of outreach tactics and education reinforcement,designed to address the researched characteristics of that complex,help ensure successful outreach which will increase recycling and decrease contamination. 4-32 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 114 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Provide manager and maintenance staff education- Involvement and support from the property manager and staff is important to the long-term success of multi-family recycling. The institutional knowledge property managers can provide and the role they play in delivering education to each tenant and at each container are important considerations. This function should be supported with training and materials. • Provide ongoing recycling education for residents- Recycling education needs to be provided on a continuing basis because most multi-family complexes have high tenant turnover. Providing education materials with the lease and at least annually coupled with information through newsletters and posters ensure that residents get the message and it is reinforced on a regular basis. • Involve collection companies to assist with service improvements and education-The collection company should be involved to provide insight and information about complexes'recycling infrastructure systems and to help with education outreach and feedback to the tenants about the quality of the recycling and level of contamination. Companies should monitor the recycling performance of - 5' i -71 the complexes and tag or refuse pickup _ of loads that are contaminated. Smog Green, • Expand organics collection-Currently, Think Clean, only a few cities are offering collection of food scraps and food-soiled paper to multi-family residents.The cities and * '' the county will need to work with the Aim am- collection companies to determine what containers and collection methods will work best for multi-family complexes. Education and promotion will be a critical A collection truck picks up garbage at a business(Photo courtesy of component of the new multi-family food Waste Management) scrap collection programs. Non-Residential Collection The non-residential sector comprises a range of businesses,institutions,and government entities from manufacturing to high-tech and retail to food services.This sector has achieved recycling successes in the last few years,with a recycling rate of almost 71 percent in 2014,according to Ecology statewide recycling data. Unlike the residential waste stream,the types of materials discarded by the non-residential sector differ widely from business to business.Thus,the recycling potential for any particular business or industry can vary greatly. For example,restaurants and grocers are the largest contributors of food scraps,while manufacturers may generate large quantities of plastic wrap and other packaging materials. Because of the diversity of businesses in the region,a more individualized approach is needed to increase recycling in this sector.One area with significant room for improvement is the diversion of food scraps and food-soiled paper. The largest increase will be realized as more restaurants and grocers contract with private-sector companies to collect their food scraps for composting,and more cities begin to offer embedded commercial organics collection. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-33 Att A Page 115 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Strategies for increasing recycling in the non-residential sector present some of the same challenges as the multi- family sector,including: • The lack of consistent and/or adequate building standards for locating collection containers. • The need for financial incentives for business owners,property managers,and tenants to take advantage of recycling services.For example,cities that include recycling services in their garbage rate provide a financial incentive for businesses to recycle. • A need for consistent and ongoing technical assistance and education. Involvement and support of the business owners and property managers is important to the long-term success of recycling at individual businesses or complexes.Educating building maintenance staff about properly collecting recyclables from building tenants is important to ensure the proper handling of recyclables. Education for employees about proper recycling methods is also crucial. To assess the relative size of the non-residential waste stream in different jurisdictions,the division looked at the number of jobs located within them.About 94 percent of jobs in the King County service area are located within incorporated cities.More than 73 percent of these jobs are in cities where the garbage collection contracts include recyclables collection in the garbage fee.These contracts typically define the capacity required for recycling collection as 150 to 200 percent of the amount of garbage capacity,and target collection of the same materials as residential curbside programs. Non-residential customers have the option to take advantage of recyclables collection offered by their service provider or to contract with other collection companies that may pay for the more valuable recyclable materials, such as high-grade office paper.For cities with collection contracts,adding recycling service to their contracts and including the cost of service in the garbage rate does lead to higher non-residential recycling rates and ensure that recycling 0 0 tl, services are available to all businesses. However,while including recycling service in the rate requires all businesses to pay for the service,it does not require that • k • '� those businesses use the service that the city contractor provides. Businesses in unincorporated King County and cities with UTC-regulated collection services can choose from a wide array of recycling service providers in King County for their recycling g needs. Promotion of these services by the s county and these cities will help increase awareness among businesses of the available options. For example,the county's"What do I do with...?"website(www.kingcounty.gov/ Food waste comprises a large part of the waste stream at restaurants whotdoldowith) is one place businesses can look for a service provider. Another strategy that might increase recycling for some business customers is to consider a rate structure based on weight or composition of waste,rather than the size of the container.A study was conducted to measure container weights for non-residential wastes on five weekday collection routes in the City of Kirkland over a 12-month period (KCSWD et al.2008a).This study determined that businesses with large amounts of food scraps generate garbage 4-34 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 116 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 that is significantly heavier than the garbage generated by businesses without large amounts of food scraps.In Washington,non-residential garbage rates are based on the size of the garbage container.So generators of heavy materials,such as food scraps,pay less than they might if the rates were based on weight,as they are in some jurisdictions across the country. Because a weight-based rate would likely cost more for generators of large amounts of food scraps,it would provide an incentive for increased participation in organics recycling programs.Another strategy is to offer organics collection to businesses at no additional cost or at rates less than garbage. Construction and Demolition Materials Collection and Recycling Construction and demolition debris is from the construction,remodeling,repair,or demolition of buildings,other structures,and roads and accounts for approximately 30 percent of all waste generated in King County.Construction and demolition debris includes clean wood,painted and treated wood,dimensional lumber,gypsum wallboard, roofing,siding,structural metal,wire,insulation,packaging materials,and concrete,asphalt,and other aggregates. The county banned the disposal of large loads of construction and demolition debris at the county-owned transfer stations and Cedar Hills landfill in 1993.In the following years,until 2016,the division contracted with two private sector companies to manage the majority of the region's construction and demolition debris. Construction and demolition materials are typically hauled from a job site by: 1)the contractor or individual working at the job site,2)an independent construction and demolition debris hauler permitted to handle construction and demolition debris for recycling only,or 3)a collection company permitted to haul materials for both recycling and disposal. Construction and demolition debris processing of recyclable materials occurs using either source-separated or commingled methods.Source-separated processing,which occurs particularly on large projects with adequate space,involves sorting specific types of construction and demolition material on the job site(e.g.,metals,concrete, and clean wood)and transporting them to one or more recycling facilities.Commingled processing involves placing all recyclable construction and demolition debris in one container and then transporting the loads to a facility that uses mechanical and manual methods to sort the recyclable materials. Non-recyclable construction and demolition waste should be hauled directly to a construction and demolition debris transfer station where the waste is transferred to rail cars for transport to a - landfill. The division does not accept construction " " s and demolition waste at its transfer stations or Cedar Hills landfill,except for incidental amounts. King County " Ordinance 18166,effective January 2016, requires that construction and demolitionm waste must be taken to a designated privately-operated construction and demolition debris recycling and/ or transfer facility.The division has agreements with the designated facilities that require these facilities to recycle readily recyclable materials.These Container with construction and demolition debris for recycling 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 4-35 Att A Page 117 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 facilities are banned from landfilling certain materials including:clean wood;cardboard;metal;gypsum scrap(new); and asphalt paving,bricks and concrete.All other construction and demolition waste may be disposed.As markets develop,the division will consider banning other construction and demolition materials as well. With improvements in the ability of processing facilities to separate materials,the current trend is toward the commingling of recyclable construction and demolition debris. If recyclable construction and demolition debris and garbage are commingled,however,the recyclables are more difficult to extract and the processing facilities end up having lower facility diversion rates.These mixed loads should therefore be disposed of in their entirety. Independent construction and demolition debris haulers with commercial permits can transport recyclable construction and demolition materials from job sites to either source-separated or commingled construction and demolition debris processors.These independent haulers cannot,however,transport construction and demolition materials for disposal.Only collection companies permitted by the UTC to haul solid waste can transport construction and demolition materials for disposal. The designated facilities listed in Tables 4-7 and 4-8 have agreements with the division and are a part of a network of designated facilities where construction and demolition materials can be recycled and/or disposed. Figure 2-4,a map in Chapter 2,shows the locations of these facilties.These facilities agree to meet criteria that the division specifies for recycling of construction and demolition materials.The division contracts with the King County Sheriff's department to provide enforcement that helps to ensure that materials are being recycled.Cities are encouraged to adopt regulations that complement the King County ordinance.The division's GreenTools program is available to provide technical assistance to cities and has a model ordinance for cities to use. Table 4-7. Designated facilities for non-recyclable construction and demolition waste (July 2018) Construction and Demolition Material Location King County Tons Facility Processed in 2017 Republic Services Third&Lander Recycling Center&Transfer Station 2733 3rd Ave South,Seattle 10,358 Black River Recycling&Transfer Station 501 Monster Road,Renton 44,823 Waste Management Cascade Recycling Center 14020 NE 190th,Woodinville 14,237 EastmontTransfer/Recycling Station 7201 W Marginal Way SW,Seattle 19,654 Recycling Northwest 701 2nd Street NW,Auburn 28,086 4-36 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 118 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 4-8. Designated facilities for recyclable construction and demolition waste (July 2018) Construction and Demolition Location King County Tons Material Facility Processed in 2017 Alpine Recycling 3504112th Street E,Tacoma 2,439 DRS Seattle(managed by DTG) 7201 E.Marginal Way S.,Seattle N/A DTG Renton 701 SW 34th Street,Renton 77,077 DTG Woodinville 5906 238th Street SE,Woodinville 18,059 DTG Maltby 8610 219th Street SE,Woodinville 7,010 Maltby Container and Recycling 20225 Broadway Avenue,Snohomish 81740 Recovery 1 1805 Stewart Street,Tacoma 6,352 United Recycling-Seattle 74 S.Hudson Street,Seattle 2,314 United Recycling-Snohomish 18827 Yew Way,Snohomish 23,896 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 4-37 Att A Page 119 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 4 q " Greet) Bin aMM Vii'" ow Asa uw syLwXr r.ar`r. ^ .roka ,arrwM..� i Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Solid Transfer and rocessin Pg System Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Policies T-1 Provide solid waste services to commercial collection companies and self-haul customers at transfer stations,and to self-haul customers at drop boxes. T-2 Provide solid waste transfer services in the urban and rural areas of the county that may be tailored to local and facility conditions and interlocal agreements with King County cities. T-3 Engage cities and communities in the siting and development of facilities,and in developing mitigation measures for impacts related to the construction,operation,and maintenance of transfer facilities, as allowed by applicable local,state,and federal laws. T-4 Build,maintain,and operate Solid Waste Division facilities with the highest green building and sustainable development practices. T-5 Provide for collection of recyclable materials at all transfer facilities -recognizing resource limitations,availability of markets,and service area needs-focusing on maximum diversion of recyclables from the waste stream and on materials that are not easily recycled at the curb or through a readily available producer or retailer- provided program. Att A Page 122 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions The following table includes a menu of recommended actions that the county and the cities should implement.Under the responsibility column,the entity listed first has primary responsibility for the action,bold indicates that the entity has responsibility for the action,and a star(*) indicates that the action is a priority. If the responsibility is not in bold,the action has lower implementation priority. • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Except as noted in action 2-t,continue to implement transfer station Page 5-16 • modernization as set forth in the Solid Waste Transferand Waste Management Plan and approved by the Metropolitan King County Council in 2007,including siting and building a new Northeast recycling and transfer station and closing the Houghton station when the new station is complete.Adapt the siting process included in the Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan to meet community needs in the Northeast service area. Although approved for closure under the Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Page 5-16 • Management Plan,reserve the option to retain the Renton station until the new urban transfer facilities have been completed and the impact of closure has been fully evaluated. Evaluate adding a second scale and an additional collection container at the Page 5-22 • Cedar Falls Drop Box to improve capacity. After the new recycling and transfer stations(including the new South station) Page 5-22 • are sited,if service level assessments indicate the need for additional capacity in the rural areas,consider siting drop box facilities. Periodically evaluate the level of service criteria to ensure that the criteria Page 5-11 • remain relevant. Explore prospects for the transfer of commercial loads of organics through Page 5-26 • county transfer stations. Continue to implement a resource recovery program at new recycling and Page 5-5 • transfer facilities to remove targeted materials from the waste stream. Att A Page 123 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Encourage recycling processors to continue to improve facility sorting and Page 5-25 processing equipment and practices to remove contaminants and separate recyclables into marketable commodity grades. Page 5-26 In collaboration with stakeholders,pursue and identify new technologies • and expanded processing capacity to serve the region,and more sustainably manage organic waste. Continue to evaluate and assess the feasibility of advanced materials recovery Page 5-28 • and anaerobic digestion at division facilities. In the event of an emergency,reserve the transfer system for municipal solid Page 5-24 • waste and make the recycling of related debris a priority. Identify potential temporary debris management sites where emergency Page 5-24 • debris can be stored until it is sorted for recycling or proper disposal. Provide education and outreach on the proper management of home- Page 5-6 • generated sharps. Att A Page 124 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 SQ,Iid Waste Transfer and Processing The increased focus on environmental stewardship has reshaped the role of transfer stations in managing solid waste, creating the need for more robust and modern facilities that will facilitate a sustainable system in the future. This chapter outlines a transfer system plan that will improve current levels of service,with the flexibility to adapt to changing needs and emerging technologies.The chapter also discusses plans for effectively managing local and regional emergencies. The Transfer System and Services The concept of a regional transfer and disposal network in King County grew out of a nationwide movement in the 1960s to impose stricter standards for protection of public health and the environment.The original purpose of the transfer network was to replace the open,unlined community dump sites in use at the time with environmentally safe transfer facilities where garbage could be delivered by curbside collection trucks and self-haulers. From these transfer sites garbage could then be consolidated into larger loads for transport to the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill (Cedar Hills) (see Figure 5-1). Table 5-1 lists the locations of current transfer facilities,along with the tons of garbage,yard and wood waste received, numbers of customers served,and recycling services provided for at each facility. 0 i ram 'Ar Jot as s - 41a+ . . +r r .. Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 5-1 Att A Page 125 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 5-1. Locations of solid waste facilities Bothell -------------------------- z Lake Forest 1 Shorelin; park[ woodinv le w S en r ADu'vaff Seattle Kirkl nd 0 p Redmond Yarrow Poin n 520 Hunts P C is Cly H II d Medin Bellevue ea A Sammamish erc Factoria I an c Newcastle Issaquah S ie i 1 orth end urien Tuk it Re Cedar Hills Regional Landfill / Renton 769 SeaTac L.0 No Cedar Falls Vashon ar Lake 18 Vashon Island ?Des Moi Kent vington Maple Valley � 767 0 f� 1 f V Auburn Federal Way Blac Diamo d ona O Algona _Milto_n --Pacific 169 U O Enumcaw King County solid waste facilities °faW Landfill Transfer Station Drop Box King County Boundary 0 2 4 S E Q Cities Miles Unincorporated Area a�,roo n wowo menol�nvMnng omo�a omo�a o„tea 1-7 5-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 126 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 5-1 . Current facilities and services C IA North County Standard curbside recyclables" appliances, Shoreline Recycling& bicycles and bicycle parts,clean wood, Replace First Northeast Transfer Station" 2008 57,619 15,927 101,013 fluorescent bulbs and tubes,scrap metal, Transfer Station. 2300 North 165th St textiles,yard waste,flags,plastic film and Complete 2008. Shoreline 98133 plastic grocery bags,expanded polystyrene foam blocks and coolers,household sharps. Northeast County Standard curbside recyclables,scrap metal, Factoria Recycling& textiles,appliances,clean wood,yard waste, Transfer Station household sharps,and moderate risk waste Replace Factoria Transfer 13800 SE 32nd St 2017 142,425 697 110,461 including recycling of batteries(household, Station. Bellevue 98005 vehicle or marine),fluorescent bulbs and Complete 2017. tubes,thermometers and thermostats, propane tanks. Houghton Transfer Close Houghton Transfer Station mid- Station when replacement 11724 NE 60th St 1960s 154,547 638 128,674 Standard curbside recyclables,textiles. capacity is available.Process Kirkland 98033 to review capacity needs starting in 2018. Central County Standard curbside recyclables,appliances, Bow Lake Recycling& bicycles and bicycle parts,clean wood,scrap Replace Bow Lake Transfer Transfer Station metal,yard waste,fluorescent bulbs and tubes, 2013 285,874 8,023 212,035 Station. 18800 Orillia Rd South plastic film and plastic grocery bags,expanded Complete 2013. Tukwila 98188 polystyrene foam blocks and coolers, household sharps. Close Renton Transfer Station when replacement capacity is available. Renton Transfer Station No decisions have been made 3021 NE 4th St mid-1960s 64,569 721 87,456 Standard curbside recyclables,textiles. regarding closure pending Renton 98056 completion of the new South Recycling and Transfer Station and decisions for a potential Northeast Station. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 5-3 Att A Page 127 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 IA M IA LL South County Close Algona Transfer Station Algona Transfer Station and replace it with a new 35315 West Valley Hwy mid- 154,975 N/A 145,452 None. South Recycling and Transfer Algona 98001 1960s Station. Site selected,anticipated opening date in 2023. Rural County Cedar Falls Drop Box Standard curbside recyclables,textiles,yard 16925 Cedar Falls Rd SE 1990 3,820 704 20,903 waste. North Bend 98045 Enumclaw Recycling& Standard curbside recyclables,appliances, Transfer Station 1993 24,169 2,163 53,601 clean wood,scrap metal,textiles,yard waste, 1650 Battersby Ave East fluorescent tubes and bulbs. Enumclaw 98022 Skykomish Drop Box 74324 NE Old Cascade 1980 1,522 52 3,695 Standard curbside recyclables. Hwy Skykomish 98288 Vashon Recycling& Standard curbside recyclables,appliances, Transfer Station scrap metal,textiles,yard waste,fluorescent 18900 Westside Hwy 1999 7,674 2,302 20,013 tubes and bulbs,household and business SW generated sharps,construction and Vashon 98070 demolition debris'° Only paid transactions are recorded. Replaced the First NETransfer Station. Standard curbside recyclables are glass and plastic containers,tin and aluminum cans,mixed paper,newspaper,and cardboard. Construction and demolition debris is accepted for disposal. 5-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Mafiagen2e7d Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 128 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Resource Recovery at Transfer Stations Resource recovery is separation of recyclables that happens after disposed materials are received by the county. It is a growing aspect of division business. Historically,the division's recycling programs have been limited to source separation by curbside customers. However,since 70 percent of the materials brought to the transfer stations could be recycled,sorting out target materials can help reach recycling goals.The division is increasing its resource recovery efforts.Based on a successful pilot project that separated tons of recyclables at the Shoreline Recycling and Vji °�"`- 1 _ Transfer Station,new staff were approved for expanded sorting of recyclables from mixed waste at the Shoreline, Bow Lake,and Enumclaw stations. Recycling bins are also provided near where self-haul customers unload their ,• cars at those stations. �. In addition to providing the standard recycling services, Bow Lake,Enumclaw,and Shoreline Recycling and Transfer ' Stations have increased the amounts of cardboard,scrap metal,and clean wood recycled by actively removing these materials from mixed waste with use of an excavator and by providing additional staff to engage customers in ATransfer Station Operator recovers cardboard from a mixed load of solid waste the separation of recyclables from mixed waste loads at the point of disposal. -o—o—o- Materials Recovery by the Numbers In 2017,additional staffing,recycling bins,and signage in the self-haul areas resulted in the recovery of 7,184 tons of cardboard,metal,and wood,an increase of 1,323 tons over 2016. Tons)Materials Recovery(Additional April 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Bow Lake 0 1,160 2,814 3,426 7,400 Enumclaw 6 156 286 776 1,224 Shoreline 1,184 2,114 2,761 2,982 9,041 1,190 3,431 5,861 7,184 17,666 Services for Moderate Risk Wastes Many common household products,such as pesticides and certain cleaning products,contain ingredients that are toxic,flammable,reactive,or corrosive.Disposed improperly,these products,referred to collectively as moderate risk waste,can pose a threat to human health and the environment.Moderate risk waste generated in King County is managed through the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program (LHWMP).This program is jointly managed by 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 5-5 Att A Page 129 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 King County,the City of Seattle,the 37 cities within our service area,and Public Health.The guiding policies and plans are contained in the joint Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan(Watson 2010),mandated under RCW 70.105. The county accepts moderate risk waste from residents through two avenues:the traveling Wastemobile and the stationary drop-off site at the Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station.In addition,the City of Seattle operates two moderate risk waste collection sites within its borders,which are open to all King County residents.Wastes collected through these services are recycled,reused,or incinerated when necessary.None is disposed at Cedar Hills.Moderate risk waste collection for residents is funded through a surcharge on garbage disposal,residential and business garbage collection, and wastewater discharge fees.Residents and businesses using `` the services are not charged at the drop-off locations.Jurisdictions receive funds from the LHWMP to provide the service. Created in 1989,the county's Wastemobile was the first r program of its kind in the nation. It is a mobile service that travels to communities within King County,staging collection of moderate risk waste at each site for two or three days at a time. The traveling Wastemobile had 21 events in 2017 that served 11,851 King County residents,collecting 272 tons of moderate risk waste.This represents a customer increase of five percent from 2016.The Wastemobile also provides a mobile moderate risk waste collection at The Outlet Collection Seattle(formerly the Supermall) in Auburn each Saturday and Sunday. In 2017, k3 235 tons of moderate risk waste were collected at this location - -�7 4pf71.,.arw from 9,481 customers,six percent more customers than used the service in 2016.The county's Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station offers moderate risk waste drop-off service six days a The moderate risk waste collection facility at the week. In September 2017,the new Factoria state-of-the-art new Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station collects moderate risk waste facility opened. It has more capacity and moderate risk waste from households and small functionality than the previous facility did,enabling the division businesses to effectively and safely collect hazardous waste.In 2017,a little over 13,000 customers brought 281 tons of moderate risk waste to Factoria. Since 2008, Factoria and the Wastemobile have also accepted moderate risk waste from small businesses. In 2017,this program served 267 small-quantity generator business customers and collected 18 tons of moderate risk waste. Collection of Sharps Sharps are medical products,such as hypodermic needles,scalpel blades,and lancets,which require special handling to ensure their safe collection,transfer,and disposal.Without proper containment,sharps can pose a safety hazard to workers through potential exposure to blood-borne pathogens or other disease-causing agents.Within King County, the disposal of sharps is regulated by Title 10 of the Code of the King County Board of Health and by King County's Waste Acceptance Rule PUT 7-1-6(PR),9/17. Disposal of sharps in the general waste stream is prohibited.Separate,secure receptacles for sharps collection are provided for residents and small businesses at the Vashon Recycling and Transfer Station with prior authorization from the division's Special Waste Unit. Residents may also deposit home-generated sharps in separate,secure receptacles at the Factoria,Shoreline and Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Stations.Business-generated sharps are not accepted 5-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 130 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 at the transfer facilities,except at Vashon with prior authorization from the Special Waste Unit.Sharps generated by medical facilities or businesses are accepted for disposal at Cedar Hills with prior authorization from the Special Waste Unit. There are alternative methods for the proper management of sharps. For example,some health care providers and pharmacies will take back used sharps in pre-approved containers.There are also mail-in programs available. Trends in Transfer Station Usage Figure 5-2 shows the tons of garbage received at the transfer stations and the landfill over the last 27 years.The drop in total tons disposed in the early to mid-1990s is attributable to the success of waste prevention and recycling programs that began in the late 1980s,the withdrawal of the City of Seattle from the county's system in 1991,and the ban on most construction and demolition debris from the division's solid waste system in 1993. In 2004,the amount of garbage taken directly to Cedar Hills decreased significantly due to an increase in the fee charged to commercial collection companies that were hauling wastes directly to the landfill.The economic downturn is primarily responsible for the tonnage reduction since 2007.The division does not expect a rapid return to earlier tonnage levels. Figure 5-2.Total tons processed at transfer facilities and disposed at Cedar Hills (1990 - 2017) 1,400,000 Transfer Facilities 1,200,000 Cedar Hills 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 O N M � Ln l0 n 00 O1 O N M � Ln l0 n 00 O1 O 0� d1 ON � 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� O O O O O O O O O O d1 d1d1 d\ d1 d1 d1 d1 d1 d1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Seventy-two percent of the garbage received at the transfer facilities in 2017 was brought by the larger,commercial collection trucks,with the remaining 28 percent delivered by business and residential self-haulers(shown in Figure 5-3).While the larger garbage loads come from the commercial haulers,self-haulers account for 87 percent of the customer transactions (Figure 5-3).At some of the urban stations that are operating at or near maximum capacity, the mix of self-haul and commercial customers can cause long traffic queues and crowded conditions on the tipping floor.Transfer station capacity depends on a number of variables such as the mix of collection trucks versus self- haulers,available tipping stalls for each,on-site queue capacity for each,and trailer loading ability(in the case of the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 5-7 Att A Page 131 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 5-3. Percent of tons and transactions at transfer facilities by hauler type (2017) tons transactions Commercial haulers Self-haulers 28% so 87% older stations with no preload compactors). The division has managed these problems,to the extent possible at each station,by providing separate queuing lanes for the two customer types and allowing maximum separation on the tipping floor,for safety as well as efficiency.Crowding is somewhat eased by the fact that self-haulers typically use the stations more on weekends,while commercial transactions occur primarily on week days. To understand who self-hauls to the transfer facilities and why,the division conducts periodic surveys of customers through on-site questionnaires at each facility.Self-haulers consist of single-and multi-family residents and non- residential customers,such as landscapers,small contractors,industries,offices,stores,schools,government agencies, and increasingly,independent haulers for hire.The most common type of self-hauler is the single-family resident. Of the self-haul trips,about 88 percent are made by residential customers,who bring in about 75 percent of the self- haul tons.About 12 percent of the trips are made by non-residential self-haulers,bringing about 25 percent of the self-haul tons. The number one material disposed by self-haulers is dimensional lumber(a subset of construction and demolition debris),followed by yard waste,other construction and demolition wastes,furniture,and scrap metal.The division's waste characterization studies indicate that approximately 70 percent of the materials disposed by self-haulers are recyclable. Planning Capacity at New Recycling and Transfer Stations New recycling and transfer facilities are being designed to safely and efficiently serve both commercial and self-haul customers.When a new station is designed,maximum capacity is not targeted to occur when the station opens,but is dependent upon vehicular projections into the future,usually 20-30 years.The mix of traffic and tonnage on weekends and weekdays varies significantly,so itis usually vehicular capacity on weekends that drive queue length,number of tip stalls,and therefore overall size of the facility.On weekdays,tonnage drives the operation of a station. 5-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 132 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste characterization studies conducted at transfer stations also survey self-haulers on-site at the transfer facilities (Cascadia 2016).The most common reason for transfer station visits was"large amount of garbage"(18 percent). Other primary reasons for self-hauling included,"items too big to fit in garbage can;"(16 percent)"cheaper or saves money"(14 percent),"other"(10 percent),and"cleaning home or workplace"(nine percent).The most frequent response from nonresidential customers was"large amount of garbage"(26 percent). Evaluation and Planning for the Urban Transfer Stations The county's implementation of the Solid Waste Transferand Waste Management Plan(Transfer Plan)is underway to renovate the aging transfer system to better serve its customers.This investment in the transfer system will help the division meet demands created by the growth in population since Cedar Hills began accepting waste in the mid- 1960's,by technological changes in the industry,and by ongoing advances in the recycling and salvage of materials from the waste stream. The Planning Process Since 1992,continuing growth in the county and technological changes in the industry have intensified the need for significant improvements and updates to the division's infrastructure.The 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(2001 Plan) reasserted the need for an updated transfer system (KCSWDl 2002).Given the scope of changes anticipated,both the cities x and the county recognized the need for a more coordinated approach to the planning and decision-making process. In 2004, the County Council adopted Ordinance 14971,which prioritized evaluation of the urban transfer station network as an integral part of the waste management plan and established a process for collaborative participation by the cities in solid waste planning. Codified in KCC 10.25.110,Ordinance 14971 outlined an iterative process of analysis and reporting that would culminate in a plan containing recommendations for upgrading the solid waste system.The ordinance also established a forum for cities, division,and County Council staff to collaborate on solid waste planning through the advisory committees-the Solid Waste The Algona Transfer Station was built in the mid-1960's Advisory Committee(SWAC)and the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee(MSWMAC).The legislation also created the Interjurisdictional Technical Staff Group(ITSG)to assist MSWMAC with its work.ITSG included staff representatives from the cities,County Council staff,and the division.The group was very active during the initial stages of data gathering and analysis for the planning process,but is no longer meeting.Much of the initial work was to evaluate the whole system and develop recommendations that would help inform and guide the direction of this Plan. Along with division staff,the committees first analyzed various aspects of the solid waste system through four iterative milestone reports.These reports identified the need to renovate the county's urban transfer facilities by evaluating the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 5-9 Att A Page 133 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 current conditions of each facility,discussed options for public and private ownership and operation of solid waste and recycling facilities,and identified packaged alternatives for the future configuration of the transfer station network. These four milestone reports culminated in the Transfer Plan,which provides recommendations for upgrading the transfer station system and services;methods for extending the lifespan of Cedar Hills;and options for preparing the landfill for eventual closure.Through the process of analysis and reporting,the division's stakeholders had a significant role in shaping the recommendations in the Transfer Plan.At the conclusion of the process,they communicated their support of the plan to the King County Executive and the County Council. Before final approval of the Transfer Plan,the County Council requested an independent third-party review of the Transfer Plan.The review was conducted by the firm Gershman,Brickner&Bratton,Inc.,who fully supported the primary objectives of the plan to modernize the transfer station system and maximize the lifespan of the Cedar Hills landfill.Based on Gershman,Brickner&Bratton's review and the support of both SWAC and MSWMAC,the County Council unanimously approved the Transfer Plan in December 2007. In 2012,as the division moved to implement the Transfer Plan,several cities raised questions about how changes in core planning assumptions may call for a change in if/how to proceed with the replacement of the Algona, Factoria, and Houghton transfer stations.With a lower tonnage forecast than was predicted in 2006 when the Transfer Plan was agreed to,and the indication that five cities were going to exit the system in 2028 resulting in an additional drop of system tonnage,it was decided to conduct a Transfer Plan Review,starting in 2013.At the end of that process,it was confirmed that a new Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station should be built and siting for a new South County Recycling and Transfer Station should continue. However,siting for a new Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station was postponed while alternative options were explored. In 2014,Council Motion 14145 directed the division,in collaboration with stakeholders,to continue to evaluate a mix of capital facilities and operational approaches to address system needs over time,including implementing operational approaches such as transaction demand management strategies that would provide service for the northeast county without building an additional transfer station;and to compare trade-offs and benefits with the Transfer Plan. The division transmitted a final report to the County Council on June 30,2015 as directed by Motion 14145. The report reaffirmed that the siting process for the South County Recycling and Transfer Station should continue,but that the siting process for the Northeast Recycling and Transfer,. e Station should be postponed. Instead,the report recommended that the division conduct a demand management pilot to test whether instituting longer The new Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station opened in the fall of 2017 5-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 134 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 hours and peak pricing at the Factoria Transfer Station would influence customers to either use the station at different hours or to use another station. During lengthy discussions with the division,advisory committees raised numerous concerns about the demand management pilot,including its impact on service levels,traffic,and regional equity. In 2017,with the city of Bellevue signing the Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement(Amended and Restated ILA),and higher tonnage than was forecast in 2014 coming into the system,the county concluded that the demand management pilot as planned would likely not be effective.County Council Ordinance 18577 and accompanying Motion 14968 canceled the demand management pilot and initiated a further planning effort for transfer capacity in the Northeast service area.The legislation allocated one million dollars to planning work to assess waste transfer capacity needs in the Northeast area of King County and options to meet these needs.It also directs the division to plan for needed transfer station capacity in the Northeast area that would be in addition to the existing Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station. By early 2018,the remaining four cities,Clyde Hill, Hunts Point,Medina and Yarrow Point,also signed the Amended and Restated ILA. Service Level Evaluation Criteria In the first milestone report(KCSWD and ITSG 2004),the division and advisory committees developed 17 criteria to evaluate the urban transfer facilities.To determine the appropriate standards of performance,the division consulted the local commercial collection companies and other experts,and applied national environmental and transportation standards. Details on the application of these evaluation criteria to individual facilities are contained in the second milestone report prepared by the division and advisory committees and approved by the County Council (KCSWD 2005a).Criteria to address costs and rate-setting considerations were applied during the development of system alternatives in the final milestone report(KCSWD 2006a). The evaluation criteria were applied to five of the six urban stations-Algona,Bow Lake,Factoria,Houghton,and Renton.The former First Northeast station was not evaluated because it was in the process of being rebuilt.The rebuilt station opened in 2008 as the Shoreline Recycling and Transfer Station.These criteria were again evaluated and confirmed as appropriate during the 2013/14Transfer Plan Review process.They provide guidance for evaluating existing stations and designing new ones,but the facility site and other constraints may mean that new facilities do not entirely meet all criteria. For the urban station evaluations,the 17 criteria were grouped into three broad categories-level of service to customers,station capacity and structural integrity,and effects on surrounding communities.As expected for these five aging facilities,the majority of the criteria were not met,resulting in decisions to reconstruct or close the stations when sufficient replacement capacity was available. The three categories of evaluation criteria are described below: Level of Service • Estimated travel time to a facility-This criterion measures how conveniently located the facilities are for customers,measured by the maximum travel time to the closest facility in their service area.The standard was established as 30 minutes for at least 90 percent of the customers. It provides an indication of whether the transfer stations are well dispersed throughout the county. • Time on site-Time on site measures the time to get in and out of the station,including unloading time. It was evaluated separately for commercial haulers (with a standard of 16 minutes)and business and residential self- 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 5-11 Att A Page 135 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 haulers(each with a standard of 30 minutes). It provides an indicator of whether a transfer station can handle customers efficiently. • Facility hours- Individual days and hours of operation for each station are based on the division's usage data and customer trends.Some of the urban stations are open in the early morning or late evening hours to serve the commercial haulers.Currently,the only days that the entire system is closed are Thanksgiving,Christmas,and New Year's Day. • Level ofRecycling Services-The final criterion in this category was whether recycling services provided at the stations met the waste prevention and recycling policies established in the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. In general,the policies directed that all stations should 1) provide for collection of the curbside recyclables,including glass and plastic containers,tin and aluminum cans,mixed waste paper, newspaper,and cardboard,2)where feasible,provide areas for source-separated yard waste collection,and 3) maintain the capacity to add collection of new materials based on market opportunities and community needs. Station Capacity Station capacity is likely the single greatest limitation of the five urban transfer stations,both now and in the future.It was measured using a number of criteria that affect daily operations,future expansion,and emergency capacity. • Vehicle and tonnage capacity- Two major operational - -� considerations measured were station capacity for vehicle traffic and solid waste tonnage,both at the time of the study and over the 20-year planning horizon.Optimal operating capacity is the maximum ;cert It 00t number of vehicles and tonnage that can be efficiently processed through the station each hour EA10 based on the station design and v customer mix.To derive criteria that — would indicate how well a station could be expected to perform,the division modeled its criteria after the transportation standards used Recycling at the Enumclaw Recycling and Transfer Station to measure roadway capacity.The transportation standards were modified to assign measures of capacity to transfer facilities.The optimal level of service was defined as"able to accommodate vehicle and tonnage throughput at all times of the day,except for occasional peak hour times. Based on the criteria,a station that provides the optimal level of service more than 95 percent of the time is considered underutilized,meaning it offers more capacity than required for the area it serves.A level of service in which capacity is exceeded during only 5 to 10 percent of operating hours is considered optimal. • Space for three days'storage-Available storage capacity establishes whether a transfer station can continue to operate,or accept garbage,for at least three days in the event of a major regional disaster. 5-12 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 136 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Space forstation expansion-Stations were evaluated to determine 1)whether there is space for expansion on the existing property or 2)whether there is adjacent land available on which to expand operations.These two standards were used primarily to determine if the station could be expanded in its current location or if a new location would be needed to efficiently manage current and future needs. • Meets facility safety goals-While all stations hold current permits from Public Health and meet health and safety standards,overall safety is a concern as stations become more congested and operations more constricted. The presence of these physical challenges at the stations does not mean they operate in an unsafe manner;it does mean that it takes extra effort by staff and management at the stations to ensure the facilities are operating safely. • Roof clearance-This criterion measures a station's capacity to handle the larger commercial collection trucks. Through discussions with the commercial collection companies,it was determined that a minimum clearance of 25 feet was needed to allow the new,larger trucks to unload efficiently.The longer truck/trailers with automated lifts,which allow the garbage to slide out the back of the trailers, require higher vertical clearance than trucks did in the past. Before - - -- impovements were made to some of the older stations,the collection trucks could hit and potentially damage station roofs,supporting - structures,or hanging lights as � � they unload. • Ability to compact waste-This criterion examines whether the station is equipped with,or has the space to install,a waste compactor. Waste compactors increase efficiency and reduce costs by compressing more garbage into The roof at the Houghton Transfer Station was raised in 2012 to accommodate larger trucks fewer loads for transport to the landfill or other disposal option.When garbage has been compacted,transfer trailers can carry about one-third more tons per trip,resulting in less traffic,less wear on local roads,less fuel use,and a reduction in greenhouse gases. • Structural integrity-The purpose of this criterion is to ensure the facility meets code requirements for seismic, wind,and snow events.All facilities were constructed in compliance with the applicable standards of the time and were grandfathered in their current condition and presently meet the"life safety"standard,meaning the station would not endanger occupants in the event of an emergency.The current standard for assessing new transfer buildings for seismic performance is the Immediate Occupancy standard,developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA).This standard means that the facility could be occupied immediately following a seismic event. Because the King County Emergency Management Plan identifies transfer stations as critical facilities in the event of an emergency,this FEMA standard applies to all new stations. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 5-13 Att A Page 137 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Effects on Surrounding Communities One of the division's highest priorities is to minimize the effects of its facilities on host cities and surrounding communities.Through its advisory committees and meetings with cities,the division works to understand city and community issues and concerns and bring their perspectives to system planning.Working together,five criteria were developed to evaluate effects on communities. • Meets applicable local noise ordinance levels-This criterion is to ensure that a facility does not violate state or local (city)standards for acceptable noise levels.State and city standards are based on maximum decibel (dBA) levels that consider zoning,land use,time of day,and other factors. Evaluations were based on the existence of any reports of noise violations to the cities and additional noise level measurements performed at each station by a consultant. • Meets Puget Sound Clean Air Agency standards for odors-The primary measure of odor issues is complaints by the public or employees.Complaints are typically reported to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency(PSCAA)or directly to the division.Complaints to PSCAA are verified by an inspector.If an odor is verified and considered to be detrimental, PSCAA issues a citation to the generator of the odor.The division also tracks and investigates odor complaints. • Meets goals for traffic on local streets-This criterion measures the impacts on local streets and neighborhoods from vehicle traffic and queuing near the transfer stations.The area that could be affected by traffic from self- haulers and commercial collection trucks extends from the station entrance to the surrounding streets.The division hired a consultant to evaluate this criterion based on two standards: 1)that additional traffic meets the local traffic level of service standard as defined in the American Association ofState Transportation Officials Manual and 2)that traffic does not extend onto local streets during more than 5 percent of the station's operating hours. • Existence ofa 100-foot buffer between the active area and nearest residence-This criterion calls for a 100-foot buffer between the active area of the station and the nearest residence. • Compatibility with surrounding land uses-The final criterion used to evaluate the stations was the most subjective and difficult to apply.It looks at consistency with land use plans and zoning regulations,aesthetics, and compliance with state and local regulations.This criterion was evaluated for each station during lengthy discussions between the division and its advisory committees. Since the level of service criteria were first applied to the transfer stations in 2005,the division has made changes and upgrades to the system. New recycling and transfer stations have been completed at Bow Lake and Factoria,and the roofs at Houghton,Algona and Renton were raised to meet the roof clearance standard. In 2017,the division applied selected criteria to the transfer stations again,using the current system conditions and an updated tonnage forecast. Table 5-2 presents the updated results for criteria that could be affected by these changes.Although the Shoreline station was not part of the original analysis,it is included in the update for reference. 5-14 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 138 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 5-2. Key service level criteria applied to urban transfer stations 2.Time on site meets standard for 90%of trips a.commercial vehicles <16 min=yes NO YES YES 0 0 YES b.business self-haulers <30 min=yes YES YES YES YES YES YES c.residential self-haulers <30 min=yes YES YES YES YES YES YES 4.Recycling services...meet policies in 2001 Solid Waste Plan a.business self-haulers YES/NO NO YES YES NO NO YES b.residential self-haulers YES/"JCS "JCS YES YES ",n NO YES 5.Vehicle Capacity a.meets current needs YES/NO NO YES YES YES YES YES b.meets 20-year forecast needs YES/NO NO YES* YES* NO NO NO *This is very close;the result is within .5 percent of meeting the criteria. 6.Average daily handling capacity(tons) a.meets current needs YES/NO YES YES YES NO YES YES b.meets 20-year forecast needs YES/NO NO YES YES NO YES YES 7.Space for 3 days storage a.meets current needs YES/NO NO YES YES NO vu YES b.meets 20-year forecast needs YES/NO NO YES YES NO NO YES 11.Ability to compact waste a.meets current needs YES/NO NO YES YES 10 ,�0 YES Remaining criteria not listed above includes: 1. Maximum Time to a Transfer Facility 10. Meets facility safety goals 15. Meets goals for traffic on local streets a. meets current needs a. Meets LOS standard b. meets 20 year forecast needs 12. Structural integrity b. Traffic does not extend onto local a. Meets goals for structural integrity streets 95%of time 3.Facility hours meet user demand b. Meets FEMA immediate occupancy standards 16. 100 foot buffer between active area& 8. Space exists for station expansion nearest residence a. inside the property line 13. Meets applicable local noise b. on available adjacent lands through ordinance levels 17.Transfer station is compatible with expansion surrounding land use 14. Meets PSCAA standards for odors 9. Minimum roof clearance of 25 feet 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 5-15 Att A Page 139 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Plans for the Urban Transfer Stations Based on the application of evaluation criteria,the division and its advisory committees developed a plan to modernize the transfer system,including the addition of waste compactors and other changes needed to provide efficient and cost-effective services to the region's customers. Activities approved by the County Council in the Transfer Plan include the following: Bow Lake-deconstruct the existing transfer station and construct a new recycling and transfer station on the existing site and adjacent property-complete, Factoria-deconstruct the existing transfer station and construct a new recycling and transfer station on the existing site and adjacent property-complete, Algona-close the station after it is replaced by a new recycling and transfer station in the South County area-site selected, Houghton-close the station when replacement capacity is available at a new Northeast recycling and transfer station,and Renton-close the station when replacement capacity is available. Although approved for closure,this Plan recommends reserving the option to retain the Renton station in some capacity,should its closure leave Renton and surrounding rural areas underserved.After the new transfer stations have been completed,the impact of closure can be fully evaluated.Table 5-3 shows the planned changes for the urban transfer stations and the two areas identified for construction of new stations. The new Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station is located on the site of the old Bow Lake Transfer Station and on adjacent property purchased from the Washington State Department of Transportation. During construction, the facility remained open to commercial haulers and self-haulers.The new transfer building opened in July 2012, immediately followed by deconstruction of the old transfer building to make way for an expanded recyclables collection area and new scale house.The station was completed in 2013. The new Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station was built on the existing site and adjacent property purchased by the division for construction of the new facility.The old station remained open as the new transfer building was constructed.Once the new building was complete,the old building was deconstructed to make room for the stationary moderate risk waste facility and recyclables collection area.The new facility was completed in late 2017, cost approximately 90 million dollars,and will not be expanded on the upper Eastgate Way property near the Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station per Ordinance 18577 and accompanying Motion 14968. A new South County station,estimated to cost about 113 million dollars,will replace the current facility in Algona on a site just north of the existing station.A new Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station is recommended,with an estimated cost of approximately 133 million in 2017 dollars. Initial planning for Northeast area transfer capacity is underway with more substantive work toward a new Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station anticipated after Plan approval in 2019. All new stations will be built to similar standards of service and sustainability as the Bow Lake, Factoria,and Shoreline Recycling and Transfer Stations.There will be differences to accommodate community needs(e.g.,Factoria retained a stationary moderate risk waste facility),and each station will be appropriately sized and designed to meet tonnage and customer requirements.All stations will have improved capacity,waste compactors,and additional space for collection of recyclable materials.The capacity to accept yard waste and other recyclables from commercial collection companies and to sort and remove recyclables from mixed loads will also be considered for new transfer facilities. For each new station,the division will seek the highest appropriate environmental certification as mandated by the County Green Building Ordinance. 5-16 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 140 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 5-4. Locations of existing and planned solid waste facilities Bothell Lake Forest Park Bothellz � Woodinville Skyt omish �1 Shoreline Kenmore Duvall 1980's 2008IV I i Kirkland Redmond Houghton Seattle 1965 Yarrow Point ezo Hunts Point Carnation Clyde Hill Medina Bellevue Beaux Sammamish Arts Factoria Mercer Island 2017 Newcastle Issaqu '"° Snoqualmie 7 1 jNorth Bend Renton i/ Burien Tukwila 1965 ss I j�Vashon SeaTac Cedar Hills Regional Landfill 1999 Normandy Park Ce Bow Lake a 9aFalls 80' 2012 \ Des Moines \ nt j Covington Maple Valley I Auburn �\ Federal Way Black Diamond \ Algona \ 1965 Pacific -----�, General areas for siting a new transfer station Northeast Enumclaw .l 1993 Type of facility c --� New,retained or rebuilt transfer station \�J J Transfer station to be closed when replacement capacity is available Cedar Hills Regional Landfill 0 1 2 4 6 8 Drop box Miles 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 5-17 Att A Page 141 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 The timeline for completing the siting,design,construction,and closure of the urban transfer stations is shown in Table 5-3. Table 5-3.Timeline for the facility renovation plan 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Factoria open South siting design and permit construction open Algona close Northeast planning siting design and permit construction open Houghton close Renton' close or modify operations 1 Division recommends reserving the option to retain the Renton Transfer Station in some capacity. Transfer Facility Siting As described earlier in this chapter,the need for new transfer facilities was identified through a comprehensive analysis of the transfer system network,with extensive involvement from the division's advisory committees.While general areas for site locations were identified (Figure 5-4),specific sites or specific site selection criteria were not. The siting of a transfer facility is based on the technical requirements of operations and site constraints,such as site size and shape;however,a successful siting effort must also be tailored to address the needs and concerns of the service area communities.Many of the already renovated stations were rebuilt on the same site that the old station was built on in part due to the challenges finding a suitable site in the urban area.The siting process involves a number of steps—from development of site selection criteria to final selection of a site—and public involvement plays an important role each step of the way.The following section describes how the division implemented the standards and practices developed for transfer station siting during the planning process in its search for a new south county facility site.A similar process adapted to the needs of Northeast area communities will be used to site a new northeast county facility. Siting a New South County Recycling and Transfer Station The search for a site to replace the Algona Transfer Station with a new South County Recycling and Transfer Station began in 2012.The new station will serve the same communities that are served by the current Algona station— Algona,Auburn,Federal Way,and Pacific. A Siting Advisory Committee(SAC)was formed to advise the division from a community and system-user perspective by identifying community concerns and impacts,developing criteria used to evaluate potential sites,and expressing opinions and preferences.SAC members included representatives from cities,local agencies and businesses, chambers of commerce,school districts,commercial garbage and recycling collection companies,transfer station users,environmental and neighborhood groups,tribes,and interested citizens. 5-18 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 142 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 In addition to forming a SAC,the division worked to ensure that members of the communities to be served by the new station were aware of the project,were able to receive information about the project,and had opportunities to give input on the project.Public information efforts to non-English speaking communities included translating public information materials into Spanish, Russian,and Korean and providing translators at public meetings. In addition,the division conducted an initial Equity Impact Review(see text box for more information)to provide more information about the communities surrounding the potential sites. After an extensive site selection process and the completion of an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS),the County selected a site at 35101 West Valley Highway South,Algona,WA which is just north of the existing station.As indicated in Table 5-3,the next phase of this project,design and permitting,will be undertaken in the next two years,followed by another two years of construction. It is anticipated that the existing Algona Transfer Station will continue to operate until the new station is complete.At that point,the old station will close.Up-to-date information about the South County Recycling and Transfer Station project can be found on the division's website:www.kingcounty.gov/ depts/dnrp/solid-waste/facilities/algono.aspx. The Equity Impact Review The Equity and Social Justice Strategic Plan 2016-2022(King County 2016b) establishes a goal to"Develop facility and system improvements responsive to the values and priorities of residents and stakeholders and achieve pro-equity outcomes"The purpose of the Equity Impact Review is to fulfill that goal and to ensure that equity impacts are considered during the siting,design,and operation of a new facility.It is a process to identify,evaluate,and communicate the potential impacts on equity—both positive and negative—of the project.There are five phases of the Equity Impact Review which correspond to the different stages of the project.For instance,an initial Equity Impact Review was conducted during the siting of the South County Recycling and Transfer Station.The review determined the populations that would likely be impacted by the project and what the impacts might be.An expanded Equity Impact Review that will address approaches that will best meet community priorities and concerns will be an integral part of the design and operation of the facility. Providing Transfer Capacity in the Northeast Service Area As early as the 1992 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan,the Houghton Transfer Station was identified as being in need of replacement.Throughout the years,subsequent evaluations and studies,including the Transfer Plan, confirmed the need for a new station and the closure of the old one.The existing Houghton station was constructed in the mid-1960s on 8.4 acres of land.The station is bordered by the closed Houghton landfill on the north side,Bridle Trails State Park on the south side,and private homes on the east and west sides.The station has an open-sided, direct-dump style transfer building,a scalehouse,a modestly-sized no-fee recyclables collection area for a limited range of materials,and trailer parking areas. A New Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station is Recommended Although previous plans recommended a new station,a Northeast station decision was not finalized,offering the opportunity to re-evaluate transfer needs as part of this plan.County Ordinance 18577 directed that this plan"... must address current waste transfer needs in the Northeast area of King County and how those needs are proposed to be met"The Public Review Draft Plan issued in January 2018 identified three options to meet Northeast area 4 C „�c� „z1«� tau„x'lti r� ✓u r ra,,,� yr J ;y X018 -19 Att A Page 143 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 transfer needs: 1) Houghton station"as is,"2) site and build a new Northeast recycling and transfer station,and 3)a combination of existing and/or new facilities. After public comment and careful consideration of the three options,the option to site and build a new Northeast recycling and transfer station is recommended,with the Houghton station to be closed after the new station is complete.The location,services offered,and financial and transportation impacts to the community are components of providing regional equity in transfer services in the Northeast service area.A new station will provide similar services in the Northeast service area that updated transfer stations in other urban service areas now provide.The Northeast area is among the fastest growing parts of the county and was the third busiest station in terms of both tons and transactions in 2017.A new station will meet key levels of service to accommodate current and future tons and vehicles,both on a daily basis and when emergencies require extra storage. It would include compaction which could decrease truck traffic from the station to the landfill by almost a third.It would be designed to move customers through the station efficiently,reducing customer disposal time.It also would allow for full service recycling to help meet county goals.A new station is the highest cost option,but its costs are in line with the cost of modern stations recently built in other parts of the urban area.Siting a new station could take time and generate host community opposition. Initial planning for Northeast area transfer capacity is underway with more substantive work toward a new Northeast Recycling and Transfer Station anticipated after Plan approval in 2019.The division will use experience gained in siting the South County Recycling and Transfer Station to refine its approach to understanding capacity needs,evaluating potential sites,and involving the community.Criteria for any facility that might ultimately be built in the Northeast service area would be developed with members of that community.A first step in this process will be a dialogue to understand the needs and concerns of all of the stakeholders in the northeast service area. Other Northeast Capacity Options Considered The Houghton station"as is"and a combination of facilities,described below,were considered as options in the Public Review Draft Comp Plan,but are not recommended as the best way to provide transfer capacity in the Northeast service area. Keep Existing Houghton Station Open This option would keep the existing station open indefinitely and largely in its current condition.This option is the "no action"or status quo alternative to addressing transfer capacity in the Northeast service area. It would be the least expensive option but would continue to provide lower levels of service for the Northeast compared to other urban parts of the County system.Recycling options would be limited,compaction to reduce truck traffic would not be available,and there would not be enough space to efficiently accommodate the future tons and numbers of customers. Host city concerns about continued operation of the open sided station adjacent to a residential neighborhood would continue. Combination of Facilities This option would use a combination of facilities to meet transfer capacity needs based on expected population and employment growth,transportation corridors and other criteria to determine the types and sizes of transfer stations needed to serve the area. It would consider various combinations of facilities to meet transfer capacity needs. For example,one combination that was used to develop the comparison in Table 5-4 would be to leave the existing Houghton Transfer Station open to serve only self-haulers and site and build a separate facility elsewhere in the service area to serve commercial haulers.Although this option could meet more level of service targets than the Houghton station alone,it carries some of the challenges of both the Houghton"as is"option (continued open sided station,limited space)and the new NE station option (siting a new facility,potential host community opposition). 5-20 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 144 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 5-4 Comparison of key characteristics of three transfer options considered Comparative Houghton"As Is" Northeast Recycling Combination of Attribute and Transfer Station Facilities Total cost per Ton(2029)' $2.39 $13.11 $9.79 GHG Reductions from Transfer Station Recycling (2,165 MTCO2e) (32,098 MTCO2e) (28,802 MTCO2e) (2029)2 Level ofService 3 Will not meet any of the 6 Will meet all 6 key level of Will not meet all 6 key level of key level of service criteria. service criteria. service criteria. Curbside mix, textiles, Curbside mix, Curbside mix, cardboard, textiles, clean wood, cardboard, Recycling textiles,and scrap metal, clean wood, cardboard. yard waste, scrap metal,and appliances,and yard waste. other recyclables TBD. • Limited recycling and Siting a new station may take Limited recycling and flexibility Risks flexibility for the system time and be costly,and for the system in the future, in the future,and Siting a new station,and • Host city opposition. Potential host city opposition. Potential host city opposition. 1 Cost includes both capital and operating costs.Previous estimates of cost per ton and impact on the curbside rate only included capital costs 2 Using WARM model,calculates the GHG reduced by recycling at the station 3 Key level of service criteria:Time on site,Recycling services offered,Vehicle capacity,Average daily handling capacity(tons),Space for 3 days storage,and Ability to compact waste Evaluation and Planning for the Rural Transfer Facilities Historically,the rural areas were served by small community landfills.As those landfills closed, most were replaced by either a transfer station or a drop box.The Duvall and Hobart(near Maple Valley) landfills were closed without replacement. Currently,rural King County is served by two recycling and transfer stations,in Enumclaw and on Vashon Island;and two drop boxes,in North Bend (Cedar Falls)and Skykomish. The Vashon Recycling and Transfer Station 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 5-21 Att A Page 145 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 In 2007,the division applied the same 17 criteria used for the urban stations to the rural facilities. Because the drop boxes are essentially collection containers covered by roof structures,there is no building per se to evaluate,so many of the criteria did not apply.Criteria specific to the rural system were not developed because a preliminary look indicated that the rural facilities,for the most part,met the standards set for the urban system,although they may be open for fewer hours and days.To provide an appropriate level of service to area residents and the commercial collectors,the division periodically reviews the operating hours of rural facilities and makes adjustments as needed. The Enumclaw Recycling and Transfer Station,which opened in 1993,serves the City of Enumclaw and southeastern King County.The City of Enumclaw provides its own garbage collection service and takes the wastes to the transfer station.The station offers a wide variety of recycling opportunities and is equipped with a waste compactor.This station met all of the evaluation criteria,with the capacity to provide a wide range of services and the flexibility to respond to future needs. The Vashon Recycling and Transfer Station opened in 1999 to serve residents and businesses on Vashon Island.This station also met all of the evaluation criteria. It accepts a wide range of recyclables and is also equipped with a waste compactor. Because of its remote island location,the facility accepts some construction and demolition materials and special wastes for disposal that the other stations do not.The division partnered with Zero Waste Vashon,a community group focused on finding practical ways to recycle waste,to conduct a pilot program to collect yard waste mixed with food waste.The program started in October 2015 and was made permanent in 2016.The division will continue to partner with Zero Waste Vashon to find solutions to managing Island waste in a cost effective and environmentally appropriate fashion. The drop boxes are scaled-down facilities,designed to provide cost-effective,convenient drop-off services in the more remote areas of the county.The Cedar Falls Drop Box,which opened in 1990,serves self-haulers in the North Bend area. It has three containers-two for garbage and one for yard waste-and provides a collection area for some recyclables.This facility met all applicable evaluation criteria except for vehicle capacity,which is primarily due to heavy weekend use.Currently,the same scale is used by both inbound and outbound traffic,which can lead to backups on weekends when the station is most busy.The division is considering a number of improvements to this facility,including a second scale to address heavy weekend use,another container for garbage or yard waste collection,and expanded recycling opportunities. The most remote facility operated by the division is a drop box in the Town of Skykomish. Built in 1980,the drop box serves Skykomish and the communities of 4- Grotto and Baring.Skykomish provides its own garbage collection service and takes w' the wastes to the Skykomish Drop Box.The drop box is also used by self-haulers,who can bring garbage and recyclables to the facility.The Skykomish facility is unstaffed; # payment is made at an automated gate using a credit or debit card or pre-paid solid waste disposal card.There are cameras at the site to monitor activities,and division µ staff makes regular visits to the site to perform maintenance. In addition,the King County Road Services Division has a facility The Skykomish Drop Box 5-22 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 146 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 next door,from which Road's staff help monitor the site.The drop box met all the applicable evaluation criteria and appears to provide an appropriate level of service for the area.The facility received a new roof in 2008,after the old roof collapsed under record snowfall in January of that year. Some rural area customers may be affected by changes to the urban transfer system,primarily self-haulers who currently use the Houghton or Renton transfer stations.When a new urban facility is ultimately sited in the Northeast service area,the facility location may or may not adequately meet the service needs of rural areas.Should it be necessary,the division may consider siting drop box facilities to serve residents.Construction of regional transfer stations in these rural areas is not being considered. The division recommends deferring decisions about whether to site drop boxes in these potentially underserved areas and whether to close the Renton transfer station until after the new urban transfer stations have been completed and the impact on service capacity has been fully evaluated. City Mitigation Transfer stations provide an essential and beneficial public service.However,the stations have the potential to cause undesirable impacts on host cities and neighboring communities,such as increased litter,odor,noise,road/curb damage,and traffic,as well as aesthetic impacts.The division works to mitigate these impacts in a number of ways, such as collecting litter,landscaping on and around the site,limiting waste kept on-site overnight to reduce the potential for odor,making road modifications,and siting facilities on or near major roadways to keep traffic off local streets. Seven cities in the division's service area currently have county-owned transfer facilities within their boundaries: • Algona-the Algona Transfer Station, • Bellevue-the Factoria Recycling and Transfer Station, • Enumclaw-the Enumclaw Recycling and Transfer Station, • Kirkland-the Houghton Transfer Station, • Renton-the Renton Transfer Station, • Shoreline-the Shoreline Recycling and Transfer Station,and • Tukwila-the Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station. As new transfer stations are constructed in the near future,the division will work with host and neighboring cities to build stations that are compatible with the surrounding community. For example,during the design of the Shoreline Recycling and Transfer Station,the division worked closely with the community to identify impacts and mitigation measures.One result is that transfer trailers drive directly from the station onto Interstate 5 using King County Metro Transit's dedicated freeway ramps rather than city streets for access. In addition,sidewalks on nearby streets were improved;a new walking path was constructed at nearby Ronald Bog Park;trees were planted;and the portion of Thornton Creek that flows through the site underwent significant restoration.The transfer building was also moved farther from residences and is fully enclosed to mitigate impacts from noise,odor,and dust. The division has also worked closely with the City of Bellevue on the replacement of the Factoria Transfer Station. The initial plan was for a new facility to be constructed on property that fronts Interstate 90 adjacent to the south side of the old station. However,as a result of discussions with Bellevue,the division purchased adjacent property to the northwest of the old station to complete the new facility. The Amended and Restated ILA(included in its entirety in Appendix C) identifies the roles and responsibilities of the county and the cities in the regional solid waste system.The county agrees to collaborate with host and neighboring cities on both environmental review and project permitting.Additionally,the Amended and Restated ILA 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july2018 5-23 Att A Page 147 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 recognizes that,in accordance with RCW 36.58.080,a city is authorized to charge counties to mitigate impacts directly attributable to a county-owned solid waste facility. It must be established that such charges are reasonably necessary to lessen or eliminate impacts and the revenue generated may only be used for impact-mitigation purposes. Direct impacts may include wear and tear on infrastructure,including roads.The city and county will work cooperatively to determine the extent of the impacts and appropriate mitigation payments and will document any agreement. Mitigation,including any necessary analysis,is a cost of the solid waste system and as such would need to be included in the solid waste rate. Transfer Services after an Emergency Relatively common emergencies,such as seasonal flooding and winter storms,as well as major events,such as earthquakes,can create a significant amount of debris.Debris generated during these types of events can obstruct roadways,cause power outages,and interrupt essential services.A coordinated and effective plan ensures that debris is properly managed to lessen the impacts on communities,the economy,and the environment in the immediate aftermath of an emergency without causing additional problems later in recovery. To this end,the division prepared the King County Operational Disaster Debris Management Plan(Debris Management Plan)(KCSWD 2009)for unincorporated King County.The Debris Management Plan is intended to facilitate rapid response and recovery efforts during a disaster.The Debris Management Plan will be reviewed periodically,prior to the storm season,and updated as needed. The Debris Management Plan supports the 37 incorporated cities that are part of the King County solid waste system with a framework and recommendations that can be used by the cities to develop their own operational disaster debris management plans.The cities have the flexibility to develop a debris management plan that best addresses their individual needs without compromising continuity within the county.Several cities have now adopted individual plans.The City of Seattle has its own debris management plan and the City of Milton is participating in Pierce County's debris management program. The county's Debris Management Plan stipulates that during emergency response and recovery,the roles within the King County solid waste system do not change.This means that the division will continue to accept municipal solid waste at the transfer stations to the extent possible and will maximize recycling in accordance with RCW 70.95.010(8) and KCC Title 10.The transfer facilities will not be used for disposal of disaster debris that could be recycled. The debris created by a larger event,such as an earthquake,would likely consist primarily of recyclable materials,such as concrete,metal,and wood.The division's Debris Management Plan is coordinated with emergency plans prepared by other jurisdictions to maximize the recycling of these materials.The division works with the King County Regional Communications and Emergency Coordination Center(RCECC)and the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program to coordinate public information and help cities and residents identify recycling options in the event of a debris- causing emergency. Recycling the majority of emergency debris will maximize the division's capacity to continue to handle municipal solid waste over the short-and long-term. In the event of an emergency,transfer services may be suspended in the short-term.The division's priorities are to: 1. Ensure the safety of staff and customers, 2. Confirm the structural integrity of facilities and environmental control systems, 3. Coordinate with the RCECC to determine any immediate needs for division staff or equipment,and 4. Resume service. 5-24 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 148 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 The division will maximize the use of existing transfer facilities after an emergency through operational measures such as increased staffing or hours.If some transfer facilities are closed or damaged as a result of the event, customers will be rerouted to remaining stations,and commercial haulers may be routed directly to Cedar Hills landfill Additionally,the division and the cities may establish temporary debris management sites where debris can be stored until it can be sorted for recycling or proper disposal. It is recommended that potential sites in unincorporated King County and in cities be identified by each jurisdiction in advance of an emergency.The acceptance policies at these sites would be determined in response to the nature of the event and the debris that is generated. Processing Collected Materials Processing Commingled Recyclables The division expects that the private sector will continue to expand processing capacity for commingled recyclables as the need arises. In addition,numerous other private-sector facilities have emerged across the county where individual residents and businesses can bring source-separated recyclables,from paper,cans,and bottles to printer cartridges and cellular telephones,for processing. While the conversion to commingled collection makes recycling easier for consumers and has resulted in increased recycling,it presents some challenges for the recovery and processing facilities.One of the challenges is cross- contamination of materials as they are sorted and separated. This is a problem particularly for the paper stream,where `+ materials such as plastic milk jugs end up in the baled paper. :; y .Y �" �•, t Plastic bags sometimes catch in e �,. ' and jam the sorting machinery at materials recovery facilities, and they can blow around and ' ° ��++ .mo cause litter problems. Paper - w mills overseas typically perform y!M additional sorting of the _ . . materials to recover misplaced recyclables;however,most domestic paper mills dispose Sorting line at the Cascade Recycling Center(Photo courtesy of Waste Management) of these materials. In the case of glass,even small amounts of contamination in the sorted material can reduce the quality and affect the potential end use of the recycled glass.These problems illustrate a fundamental conflict between the benefits of commingled recycling (it makes collection easier and leads to increased recycling) and the need for the materials recovery facilities and end users to minimize the costs of handling these materials. For the processing of commingled recyclables to be most efficient,it is important that consumers are careful about preventing contamination in the recycled loads by: 1) preparing recyclables for the collection cart(i.e.,rinsing out bottles and jars,breaking down cardboard boxes)and 2) placing materials in the proper collection container 3)closing container lids to keep materials dry.Contamination in the recyclables can cause a wide array of problems during processing,which can lead to a reduction in the value of the materials processed for market or,in extreme 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 5-25 Att A Page 149 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 cases,the disposal of entire mixed loads.This issue can best be remedied through education programs on proper recycling techniques offered through local governments and the collection companies.See Chapter 4 for a discussion of issues regarding markets. As the region moves forward,the recommended role of the county and cities is to focus on increasing the supply and improving the quality of recyclable materials delivered to processors.The value of materials for recycling can be maximized through public education-to decrease contamination in the recycling stream and ensure that materials are properly prepared before being placed in the recycling container-and through market development-by encouraging businesses to invest in technologies used to sort and process recyclables. There are materials that present unique challenges or require more definitive decisions about the optimal way to process them,such as container glass,food-contaminated paper,compostable and degradable plastic,plastic bag and film,plastic caps,poly-coated paper,and shredded paper.The division,along with several cities,has participated in the Northwest Region Commingled Workgroup to identify key issues with commingled collection and processing and to develop recommendations for addressing them.The division will be working with the cities,the collection companies,and processors to determine which of these recommendations will be implemented in King County. Processing Organics Organic waste(yard,wood and food waste) represents the largest recyclable commodity that is landfilled-320,000 tons,more than a third of the total tons disposed at Cedar Hills landfill.Diverting these materials is key to meeting our goals.Currently composting is the primary processing option for these materials in the region. The volume of organics that is currently collected from King County businesses and residents for recycling is close to exceeding the regional permitted capacity for such processing.The current amount of recycled organics represents 90 percent of the region's processing capacity. Table 5-5. Regional compost facilities 2017 Summary of organics recycled by region Jurisdiction King County City of Seattle Snohomish County TOTAL Tons Per Year 257,829 177,315 65,800 500,944 2018 Summary of organics permitted capacity by processor Processor Cedar Grove: Cedar Grove:Everett Lenz:Stanwood TOTAL Maple Valley 17825 Cedar Grove Rd SE, 3260 36th PI NE 5210 SR 532 Address MapleValley,WA Everett,WA Stanwood,WA Tons Per Year 250,000 228,000 75,000 553,000 5-26 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 150 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 There is only one facility in King County permitted to handle food waste. Relying on one large regional facility that is operating near its maximum permitted capacity is a concern,especially if the region wants to increase the amount of organics that are recycled instead of being disposed.This facility is pursuing operational changes to help mitigate odor concerns,and continues to be the subject of community odor complaints.One reason that capacity is constrained in the region is because organics cannot be transported to Central/Eastern Washington for new processing capacity because of the Washington State Apple Maggot Quarantine regulations(RCW 17.24). Maintaining the quality of finished product is critical to compost markets,and processing challenges include: • Contamination of composting feedstocks,particularly from glass and plastic film. • Composting feedstocks are in transition. Regional commercial facilities were largely designed for yard waste,not the mix of food,yard,and compostable AL packaging that is collected and processed today.A need exists for upgraded technology to manage the new material mix. • Processors have expressed a desire to better anticipate the future feedstock mix,noting a Cedar Grove Composting Facility(Photo courtesy of Cedar Grove) need for better information on volumes and incoming materials to inform investments in capacity,equipment,and labor. • Financing for technology upgrades at existing facilities. • Composters report that market prices and sales for compost products have been stable. However,maintaining the quality of finished product is key to maintaining adequate market demand for compost;processors must balance the costs of adding processing steps(such as for additional contaminant removal)with maintaining competitive market prices for finished product. If organics diversion significantly increases in King County and the surrounding region,more processing capacity will be needed. In order to significantly increase diversion of organic materials that are disposed from single and multi-family homes and businesses,a regional dialogue with exploration of alternatives and solutions for expanding capacity is necessary.This will help minimize environmental and community impacts related to regional organics processing and ensure an adequate capacity and infrastructure is in place for regional organics processing,including contingency plans in the event regional capacity is constrained. A range of options should be pursued to address organics recycling capacity including continued organics and soils education to promote the recycling and use of organics on landscapes,market development such as local buy-back programs,the pursuit of new technologies and additional private or public infrastructure development. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 5-27 Att A Page 151 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Emerging Processing Technologies Resource recovery goes beyond sorting to include technologies such as anaerobic digestion,advanced materials recovery,pyrolysis,and gasification.Most of these technologies hold promise for the future but do not yet have extensive track records in reliably handling the amount of waste in King County's system.A brief discussion of anaerobic digestion and advanced materials recovery follows.For a discussion on pyrolysis and gasification,see Chapter 6,Landfill Management and Solid Waste Disposal. Anaerobic Digestion In 2016,the division hired HDR Engineering to evaluate options for adding anaerobic digestion to regional organics processing (KCSWD 2017b).Anaerobic digestion is a biological process that transforms organic waste into renewable energy,and in some situations,a useable residual by-product. HDR evaluated anaerobic digestion technologies using both source-separated organics with minimal contamination,and municipal solid waste containing approximately one third organic waste.The division required HDR to focus on local conditions,feedstocks,and markets. While the study does not identify a clear role for anaerobic digestion in the county's solid waste system,it does recommend further research into several small-scale anaerobic digestion options for source-separated organics,with varying levels of public and private sector collaboration.For instance,with grant money from the division,a small- scale anaerobic digester is being piloted on Vashon Island.Source-separated organics-based anaerobic digestion solutions are currently more affordable and more reliable than municipal solid waste-based systems.As a feedstock, municipal solid waste typically benefits .",' greatly from advanced pre-processing, which is costly and currently has mixed success rates. All Currently,source-separated organics in " King County are managed by private-sector r companies,and do not even come to the county's transfer stations.However,source- separated organics are likely the best feedstock for successful anaerobic digestion based on minimal contamination which Example of a small anaerobic digester in Redmond lowers pre-processing costs,eases the (Photo courtesy oflmpoct BioEnergy,Inc.) anaerobic digestion process,and results in a marketable organic by-product. Advanced Materials Recovery Advanced materials recovery as it is envisioned at the county recycling and transfer stations would involve both floor sorting of recyclables by division staff and installing some mechanical sorting systems at select facilities(most likely Bow Lake,the new south station,and any other new stations).An additional consideration might be a separate advanced materials recovery facility(public,private,or a partnership)capable of processing sufficient mixed waste to reach a 70 percent recycling rate for the county.This alternative would reach recycling goals more quickly than waste prevention would,as it relies less on changes in customer behavior.However,feasible system configurations and cost effectiveness are not yet known and would require more study,including a cost benefit analysis. 5-28 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 152 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 G I � e Att?,,,Page 453, �. • i i• Landfill Managem and Solid Disposal 4 �xk r Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Policies D-1 Operate and maintain the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill to meet or exceed the highest federal,state,and local standards for protection of public health and the environment. D-2 Maximize the capacity and lifespan of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill. D-3 Monitor and maintain closed landfills to meet or exceed the highest federal,state,and local standards for protection of public health and the environment. D-4 Plan for future disposal when Cedar Hills Regional Landfill closes to ensure no gap in service.Siting a replacement landfill located in King County will not be considered. D-5 Garbage shall not be disposed of,nor shall soils be stockpiled, within 1,000 feet of the property line at the landfill,in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. The solid waste division shall reserve sufficient funds to acquire any parcels from willing sellers as necessary to establish or maintain the buffer. Att A Page 155 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of ReCOmmended Actions The following table includes a menu of recommended actions that the county and the cities should implement.Under the responsibility column,the entity listed first has primary responsibility for the action,bold indicates that the entity has responsibility for the action,and a star(*) indicates that the action is a priority. If the responsibility is not in bold,the action has lower implementation priority. • Detailed •- • Action Discussion Further develop the Cedar Hills regional landfill to maximize disposal capacity.To account for technological advances,do not specify the next disposal method after ultimate Cedar Hills closure in this Plan. Conduct analysis of post Cedar Hills disposal options prior to the next Page 6-5 Plan update to ensure adequate lead time for selecting,planning for, and implementing the next disposal method. Continue to track,evaluate,and test other disposal and conversion technologies for their potential to handle all or a portion of the Page 6-9 county's future waste.Provide updates on findings to division advisory committees on a regular basis. To prepare for potential emergencies,work with state and regional authorities to coordinate an updated Debris Management Plan for Page 6-14 King County. Investigate beneficial reuse options for closed landfills,designing monitoring and environmental systems that will facilitate reuse of the properties,provide potential revenue,and provide continued benefit Page 6-17 to the surrounding communities. • Implement a bird management plan for Cedar Hills Regional Landfill Page 6-8 Att A Page 156 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 ndfill Mamcrement Solid Waste Disposal This chapter discusses the County's current disposal practices at the Cedar Hills landfill,as well as presenting important long-term disposal choices that must be decided as part of the approval of this Plan. It also provides information on how special wastes are disposed,disposal of waste after an emergency is handled,and programs to address disposal of illegally dumped waste are operated.Finally,it addresses how past disposal sites-closed landfills -are managed. Current Disposal at the Cedar Hills Landfill For more than 50 years,King County has relied on the Cedar Hills landfill as a local means of cost-effective solid waste disposal.Although another disposal method will ultimately be needed,the county has used several approaches to maximize value for ratepayers and extend the landfill's life beyond the 2012 closure date predicted in the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. Since 2001,new practices and policies have made better use of landfill space,new capacity has been built,the tons going to the landfill have been reduced,and studies have identified opportunities to further develop Cedar Hills to maximize disposal capacity through the planning horizon of this Plan. The Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan(Transfer Plan),approved by the County Council in December 2007,included the following recommendation: "Explore opportunities for taking advantage of available landfill capacity to extend the life of this cost-effective disposal option;revise the Cedar Hills Site Development Plan and seek to maximize the capacity(lifespan)of the landfill,subject to environmental constraints,relative costs to operate, and stakeholder interests.' To implement the Transfer Plan recommendation,the division is pursuing three primary strategies to extend landfill life: • Diversion of waste, • Operational efficiencies,and • New area development. These three strategies seek to extend the life of the landfill by increasing landfill capacity and density,which are defined as follows: • Landfill capacity-the amount of space,often referred to as airspace,which is permitted and available for disposal of waste.Landfill capacity is calculated based on the height,footprint,and slopes of the landfill. • Density-how tightly materials are packed together,in this case solid waste in the landfill.A higher density means more waste packed into a given amount of space.The density of solid waste within the landfill is a function of both operational practices,the types of waste,and natural processes. Density is increased as waste is compacted by heavy machinery on the face of the landfill and by the natural settling that occurs over time as solid waste decomposes. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2028 Att A Page 157 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Diversion of Waste Reducing the amount of waste delivered to the landfill (waste diversion) is the most effective strategy for extending landfill life.The division will continue to practice current methods of waste diversion and may implement further strategies,as discussed below and in more detail in Chapter 4,Sustainable Materials Management. Current Strategies for Waste Diversion Waste is currently diverted from Cedar Hills through two primary methods-waste prevention and recycling and a ban on the acceptance of most construction and demolition debris. Waste prevention and recycling efforts have proven a successful strategy for extending the life of the landfill.During a 20-year period,an estimated 10 million tons of materials that would otherwise have been disposed in the landfill were recycled,extending the landfill's life by approximately 10 years. Banning most construction and demolition debris from Cedar Hills has also contributed to extending landfill life.Since the disposal ban went into effect in 1994,an estimated 4 million tons of construction and demolition debris has been diverted from the landfill (see Chapter 4,Sustainable Materials Management for more information about construction and demolition debris recycling and disposal). Potential Strategies for Waste Diversion The division will continue to consider diverting a portion of the solid waste stream to another recycling,recovery, or disposal option(s)while the landfill is still in operation.However,a cost-benefit analysis,including a comparative analysis of greenhouse gas emissions,would precede any decision to pursue early diversion because the cost of adding a new disposal method to the cost of operating Cedar Hills may outweigh the benefits of extending landfill life. Possible diversion options include waste conversion technologies such as anaerobic digestion,demonstration projects of other evolving technologies that promote resource recovery,or exporting some waste to an out-of-county landfill.Environmental,social,economic,and other criteria also would play into any waste diversion decision. Operational Emciencies The division has made a series of operational changes to increase landfill capacity and density.These changes include reducing the amount of soil and rock buried in the landfill,using more efficient unloading and compaction equipment,and taking advantage of natural settlement.Some of the key changes and efficiencies achieved are described below: • The division has implemented strategies to minimize the placement of soil in the landfill.For example,in the past, six inches of compacted soil was used to cover the entire surface of the active solid waste disposal area at the end of each working day.Daily cover serves to control litter and discourage foraging by animals,such as rodents and birds.However,the use of soil consumes valuable landfill space.The division now uses retractable tarps to cover most of the waste at the end of each day to reduce the amount of soil buried in the landfill.The tarps serve the same function as daily soil cover.At the start of each day's operations,the tarps are rolled up,and more solid waste is placed directly on top of the previous day's waste.Soil is still used to cover side slope areas.However,as much of this soil as possible is removed before more waste is placed,and the soil is then reused.Together,these practices have resulted in a reduction of the volume of soil buried in the landfill. 6-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 158 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Tippers now empty trailers and containers rather than the walking floor trailers previously used.Walking floor trailers require a large,rock covered surface for the trucks to drive on as the walking floor rolls the garbage out the back of the trailer. These large rock surfaces are not required with the tippers. Instead,the garbage trailers are backed onto the ^ fT tipper,which tilts the trailer,allowing the garbage to slide out of the back and into the refuse area.The use of tippers not only reduces the use of a �° rock,it also decreases unloading time Tippers empty trailers more efficien-uy for each trailer by at least half,and reduces damage to equipment and tires. • Heavier equipment and improved methods have increased waste compaction. Packing the waste to a greater density allows more airspace for additional solid waste in each landfill area. • Another strategy for increasing landfill capacity is taking advantage of the natural settlement that occurs as waste placed in each area decomposes.As this natural settling occurs,the level of the landfill drops below the permitted height,allowing more waste to be added to bring the height of a previously filled area back up to its planned level.To take advantage of this natural settlement,the division has delayed final closure of Areas 5 and 6,and will delay final closure of Area 7,to allow settling to occur so that additional waste can be added before final cover is applied. With these operational changes,more solid waste can be placed within the already designed and permitted refuse areas.The division will continue to pursue these and other best management practices that preserve airspace and make more efficient use of landfill capacity. The division will also work with subject matter experts to determine best practices related to use of top lifts and temporary covers,including how long temporary covers should be used prior to applying final cover. The division will provide a report on the best practices with implementing actions to the King County Council no later than April 1,2020. wew Area uevelopment During 2009 and 2010,the division explored alternatives for developing new refuse areas to extend the landfill life. A wide range of alternatives was originally identified. Based on a preliminary assessment of operational and engineering feasibility,as well as likely environmental impacts,five action alternatives were developed that would extend landfill life for an additional three to 13 years beyond the then projected closure date.The environmental impacts of these alternatives were evaluated in an environmental impact statement(EIS),with the Final EIS issued in July 2010.The EIS determined that none of the five action alternatives would result in any significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts compared with the no action alternative(KCSWD 2010a). The preferred alternative from the Final EIS develops 56.5 acres for a new Area 8 in the southwestern portion of the landfill and extends landfill life for eight to nine years. It maximizes the use of readily available space at the landfill, with the least amount of disruption to existing landfill structures. Garbage shall not be disposed of,nor soils be stockpiled,within 1,000 feet of the property line at the landfill,in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. At the same time,this alternative preserves the flexibility to implement further development should it be necessary in the future and balances the cost of future development and operations with savings to the rater)aver. 6-3 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 159 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 In 2000 King County entered into a Settlement Agreement in the following consolidated class action cases:Anderson et al v.Cedar Grove Composting Inc,et al(King County Superior Court Case No.97-2-22820-4 SEA and Rick I. �,- - - - and Kim M.Brighton,et al v.Cedar Grove Composting etal(King County Superior Court Case No.97-2-21660-5 SEA(hereinafter referred to as the"Settlement Agreement"). Following publication of the Final EIS,the division submitted a Project Program Plan for implementing the preferred alternative to the Developing a new area requires extensive excavation and preparation County Council for approval (KCSWD 2010b). The County Council approved the Project Program Plan in December 2010. Permitted Capacity Planned for Cedar Hills through 2028 Q_o_o Cedar Hills has built capacity remaining in four areas(Areas 5,6,7,and 8).The estimated capacities are based on the difference between existing landfill contours(September 2,2017 aerial survey) and the approved design contours at completion. As the landfill ages,it settles.Airspace from settlement can be recovered for disposal.Settlement occurs due to consolidation and to loss of mass from leachate and more importantly,gas production.As gas is collected,it is removed from the landfill.The airspace gas once occupied consolidates and the landfill settles.Soil surcharge can be used to accelerate settlement.Areas 5 and 6 both have areas of soil stockpiled over them to accelerate settlement.This soil will be recovered later for other uses.Cedar Hills landfill has additional planned capacity in Area 8.Area 8 is currently under construction,which began in 2017 and will be ready for use in 2018.In addition to Area 8,a top lift over Areas 7 and 8 is planned to bring those areas to a permitted maximum design elevation of 800 feet.Such activity would be done only to the extent that such activity would be consistent with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement,which requires King County to make a good faith effort to keep the maximum height of areas 5,6,and 7 of the Landfill at or below 788 feet above sea level. The table below presents current and planned capacity in cubic yards and tons by area,as of September 2, 2017.It is based on an air space utilization of 1,600 pounds of refuse disposed per cubic yard of air space consumed,and an average yearly 1,025,000 tons(forecasted between 2017 and 2028). 1,600 pounds per cubic yard is the airspace utilization achieved in Area 7 using current operational practices(compaction,daily cover usage,and rock recovery).The terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement may impact the actual utilization of the Area Capacity described in the table. Area Capacity Estimated Cubic Estimated Tons Estimated Yards Number of Years 5 Top Lift 1,923,000 1,538,400 1.4 6Top Lift 1,367,000 1,093,600 1 7 2,070,000 1,656,000 1.5 8 7,842,000 6,273,600 5.7 7&8 Top Lift 1,061,000 848,800 0.8 Total 14,263,000 11,410,400 10.4 6-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 160 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 The Next Disposal Option A Disposal Option Must Be Selected as Part of This Plan's Approval With permitted capacity(Area 8)at the landfl predicted to be used by 2028,the disposal option for beyond 2028 must be selected.The selection is needed to provide substantial lead time to complete fi nancial,operational,and infrastructure preparations,including completion of environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Interlocal agreements also require the county to consult with partner cities at least seven years before Cedar Hills closes,triggering a consultation in 2021 if no new Cedar Hills capacity is built. For these reasons,selecting a disposal option as part of approval of this Plan is essential to ensure there is no gap in the division's ability to dispose of waste and meet contractual obligations. Further Development of Cedar Hills is Recommended For the Public Review Draft Plan issued in January 2018,the division used information from the Conversion Technology Report(R.W. Beck 2007),the Waste-to-Energy Study(Normandeau 2017),and an updated Cedar Hills Site Development Alternatives Final Report(KCSWD 2017a)to identify three options to meet the county's disposal needs after currently permitted capacity at Cedar Hills is used: 1) Further develop Cedar Hills,2)waste export,and 3)waste to energy(mass burn)facility.After public comment and careful consideration of the three disposal options,the option to further develop the Cedar Hills Landfl is recommended. This recommendation will further develop Cedar Hills to maximize disposal capacity,extending the division's over 50- year practice of managing its waste locally.The increased capacity shall not all result in either disposal of garbage or stockpiling of soils within 1,000 feet of the property line at the landfill,in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, but will develop new cells within the existing footprint of the landfill and increase the height from the permitted 800 feet up to 830 feet,only to the extent that such activity would be consistent with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement,which requires King County to make a good faith effort to keep the maximum height of areas 5,6,and 7 of the Landfill at or below 788 feet above sea level. Based on the 2018 tonnage forecast,maximizing the development of the landfll should extend capacity through the planning horizon of this Plan.Landfli life could be extended if recycling increases,recessions occur,or more complex development approaches are used.To account for emerging technologies,the next disposal option after Cedar Hills is not specified in this Plan,but would be evaluated in collaboration with regional partners prior to the next Plan update to ensure no gap in service.The recommended further development is consistent with county policy to maximize the life of the Cedar Hills landfill.The Conversion Technology Report(R.W.Beck 2007)and more recent division analysis concluded that Cedar Hills disposal is the most economical way to handle King County's waste.Other advantages include the division's experience in landifoperation, availability of space in a county-owned landfill with state of the art environmental controls,and collection of landfill gas to produce renewable energy. Developing Cedar Hills to the maximum extent feasible has the lowest rate impact of the three options considered, the lowest greenhouse gas emissions and the lowest risk because of long-term experience in its operation.Other benefits include that waste created in King County will continue to be managed locally,the division will maintain control over the system,and landfill gas will continue to be delivered to the Bio-Energy Washington facility,resulting in pipeline-quality natural gas,revenue for the division,and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.Table 6-1 includes a comparison of key attributes of the three options. To reduce impacts on neighboring communities,King County shall implement a bird management plan. 6-5 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 161 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 6-1. Comparison of key disposal option characteristics (planning level estimates) DevelopComparative Further Waste Export Attribute Cedar Hills Out-of-County Landfill Facility Cost per Ton' $41 $55 $136 Life Cycle Greenhouse z z s Gas Emissions (EPA's (134,000) (78,000) 12,000 to 80,000 MTCO2e MTCO2e MTCO2e WARM Model) Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions (EPA's 91,0004 91,0004 1,200,000 eGGRT) MTCO2e/year MTCO2e/year MTCO2e/yea r Recycling Rate No change No change 2%increase Risks SEPA,Permitting Rail Capacity,Control Siting,Sizing 1 Estimated cost per ton in 2029. 2 WARM model calculation for 2029.(King County SWD).For more information,see Appendix D. 3 WARM model calculation.(Normandeau 2017). 4 Landfill options show estimated emissions in 2029. rdecision odels used by Regulatory Agencies to Calculate Greenhouse Gas Emissions he Waste Reduction Model (WARM) is a U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)-approved tool for estimating relative lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with disposal ptions such as landfilling,composting,mass burn,or anaerobic digestion.WARM answers the question:Which of my next disposal options result in the lowest lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for both emissions and offsets? WARM requires a profile of disposed materials,which was drawn from the division's 2015 Waste Characterization.WARM then assigns emissions to the materials and converts the emissions into metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents(MTCO2e).Each material's emissions represent lifecycle emissions from mining to manufacturing to disposal.Because those emissions did not happen in a single year or place,WARM results cannot be directly ascribed to a particular year or facility site. WARM emissions are not precise—they represent the relative emissions of different choices (i.e.Option A has lower emissions than Option B).WARM results from this plan's landfill options show negative values largely due to offsets created by displacing fossil fuels with landfill-derived gas and sequestration of carbon due to burial of organics. • The eGGRT model creates a greenhouse gas(GHG) inventory of emissions from a specific facility (such as a landfill or mass burn facility) in a given year.This model answers the question:What are the emissions from historically disposed materials at my landfill this year? eGGRT default values can over-ride site-specific data so that model results and facility monitoring data may not entirely agree.The division reports eGGRT-estimated Cedar Hills landfill emissions each year for the Washington Department of Ecology and EPA.Year-to year eGGRT emission changes from that specific facility can be tracked and compared with emissions from other facilities.The agencies also use the results to set priorities for developing facility emission-reduction programs. 6-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 162 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Other Long Term Disposal Options Considered Waste export and a waste to energy(mass burn)facility(described below)were also considered as disposal options in the Public Review Draft Comp Plan.Those options are not recommended as the next disposal option after current permitted Cedar Hills capacity(Area 8) is used in 2028,but could be undertaken after an expanded Cedar Hills ultimately closes.This plan does not consider the option of developing a replacement landfill either in King County or in another county,in keeping with policy established in the 2001 Plan.Conditions in King County such as land availability, environmental considerations,public acceptance,cost,and other issues would impede any effort to site a replacement landfill in the county.In addition,there are existing landfills outside of King County with significant capacity available. Waste Export This option would export waste via rail to an out-of-county landfill after permitted capacity at Cedar Hills is used by 2028.Waste export by rail is a proven disposal option used by neighboring jurisdictions,including the City of Seattle and Snohomish County.There are several regional landfills available by rail with combined capacity sufficient to handle the county's waste in the long term (KCSWD 2017c).This option would transfer a significant portion of the County's waste management activities into the private sector for long haul and landfilling.This option is not recommended as the next disposal option after 2028 for several reasons. It has higher costs than further development of the Cedar Hills landfill. It requires modifying transfer stations for rail-ready transport,division operational changes, and requires sufficient lead time for contracting for services. The Waste Export option would require all of the county's waste to be exported on trains.According to the Washington State Freight Rail Plan,it is unclear if the freight rail system will have adequate rail capacity by 2028 (Normandeau 2017)to accommodate all of the county's waste. In addition,according to the Washington State Department of Transportation 2014"Landslide Mitigation Action Plan,"rail service can be disrupted by landslides and flooding. If service interruptions stretch from days to weeks,unsanitary conditions could occur at transfer stations and eventually in the neighborhoods where collection services must be stopped.Scarce rail capacity and service disruptions could increase costs and require robust contingency planning. Waste to Energy Facility Under this option,all of the region's municipal solid waste would be directed to a waste to energy facility built in King County when current permitted capacity at Cedar Hills is reached by 2028.As discussed previously,a recent study identified a mass burn facility as the best waste to energy technology for consideration by King County(Normandeau 2017).Mass burn facilities operate successfully in many parts of the U.S.and the world. To handle the county's projected tonnage,the facility would require approximately a 40 acre site and be designed to handle 5,000 tons-per-day so that it could operate 20 years before further disposal capacity is needed.After 20 years, an added/expanded waste to energy facility or other disposal method would be required.A waste to energy facility would reduce waste to ash 90 percent by volume and 75 percent by weight,while offsetting some costs through the sale of electricity and increasing recycling by as much as two percent by recovering metals after the waste is burned. Non-processable,bypass waste,and ash would be transported to an out-of-county landfill by rail.This option is not recommended as the next disposal option after 2028 for several reasons. It has the highest cost of the options considered,it requires guaranteed amounts of consistent feedstock,has potential for inefficient operation in early years when less capacity is used,and it has the highest greenhouse gas emissions of the options considered.As with waste export,rail capacity constraints could disrupt export of ash and bypass waste.At 5,000 tons per day,the facility would be among the largest in the world with associated implementation and siting risks. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Wlaste Management Plan-_July 2018 6`7 Att A Page 163 flrrlinanrc 1889:3 Updated April 17,2019 Next Steps Several actions will need to be taken in order to further develop the Cedar Hills Landfill beyond its current permitted capacity.The following steps are needed at Cedar Hills to maximize disposal capacity: • Move facilities currently located at the landfi II that are on areas permitted for refuse disposal. • Revise the Project Program Plan (KCSWD 2010b)and Cedar Hills Site Development Alternatives Final Report(KCSWD 2017a)for the development of Cedar Hills and conduct a new SEPA environmental review,since increasing the height of the landfi II up to 830 feet was not considered in the 2010 EIS(KCSWD 2010a). • Apply to Public Health—Seattle and King County for a permit modifi cation to allow the landfi II to be expanded up to 830 feet in height only to the extent that such modification would be consistent with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement,which requires King County to make a good faith effort to keep the maximum height of areas 5,6,and 7 of the Landfill at or below 788 feet above sea level. • Develop new landfi II cells. • While Cedar Hills expansion is underway,the region will need to review the latest technological advances and take those into account during the next Plan update to properly evaluate disposal options for the ultimate closure of Cedar Hills. Given the longer life of the facility,King County will develop and implement a bird management plan for the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill. The bird management plan shall include at least the following elements: • An inventory of birds at least seagull-sized or larger that inhabit the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill,including species and number of birds,to be updated annually; • Design suggestions to minimize attractiveness of the site to birds; • A description of proposed bird control methods including equipment,construction activities,permits required (including federal and state fish and wildlife permits),and other operation and maintenance requirements related to bird control; • Description of staff resources and training needed to implement the control plan thoroughly and completely; • Performance metrics related to bird management;and • A monitoring plan to,on at least an annual basis,assess the efficacy of the bird management plan and allow further adaptation and improvement of the plan.It will also provide a basis for determining if bird use of the area changes through time. In recognition of the longer life of the landfill and to ensure transparency of landfill operations,the solid waste division shall transmit to the council each year the annual report submitted to the local health jurisdiction and the department of ecology,as required by WAC 173-351-200(11),as amended. Even with further development,Cedar Hills landfill capacity will ultimately be exhausted and a new disposal option will be needed.The next disposal option is not specified in this plan so that the latest technological advances can be considered when the choice is made.The Transfer Plan suggested that one disposal option-waste export-is best evaluated within 5 years of initiating service to ensure decisions consider current market conditions.Other disposal options such as waste to energy likely require a longer lead time.Although the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement requires consultation with cities at least seven years before Cedar Hills closes,evaluation of the next disposal option should begin prior to the next Plan update to ensure enough time for method selection,planning,and implementation. JFactors in Selecting a Long-Term Disposal Method In cooperation with advisory committees,the division identified several criteria be used in selecting a long-term disposal option (see below).It is particularly important that disposal options are consistent with the commitment of the County and its partner cities to Zero Waste of Resources by 2030.Any long-term disposal option also must be responsive to increases in population,housing,and solid waste tonnage,as well as the specific composition of King County's waste.The 2018 tonnage forecast projects solid waste tons increasing to 1,275,000 tons by 2028 and continuing to grow,reaching 1,564,000 tons in 2040.This forecast assumes that the region's recycling rate remains at 52 percent. King County's Office of Performance,Strategy and Budget will engage with the Solid Waste Division and the regional partners to develop a plan for long-term disposal,to be recommended to the King County Executive, who will transmit legislation to the King County Council implementing the next long-term disposal method. The Executive will transmit a progress report that outlines how this plan will be developed,including timing for development and transmittal of this plan,to the Council by December 31,2021. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste I >u>aEmeu 1'a2 Jay X01-,' 6-8 Att A Page 164 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Screening and Evaluation Criteria for Disposal Options The division,in collaboration with its advisory committees,has developed criteria by which disposal options may be screened and evaluated when making future decisions.The screening and evaluation criteria fall into six categories,each with a number of sub-categories on the following page: • Environmental Availability Human health Capacity Climate change Start date Air quality Operating life of facility Water quality Siting,design,permitting,and construction Energy production requirements Resource conservation Operating and maintenance personnel Compatibility with waste prevention Financial assurance and insurability and recycling • Economic Social Capital cost Environmental justice Financing Social justice/equity Operating cost Effects on livability and character Revenue generated of communities Risk • Operating history Contract and operational requirements Proven performance Minimum level of waste required Ability to handle amount of waste Composition of waste required Operator record Contract flexibility Safety record Length of commitment required Environmental compliance Opportunity for contract reopeners Compliance with regulatory requirements Waste not accepted/ability to handle Ability to respond after an emergency special waste Ability to provide performance guarantees Residue disposal requirements Compatibility with waste prevention and recycling Compatibility with current collection and transfer systems Technologies for the Future A number of other thermal,biological,and chemical technologies,some established and some emerging,could handle all or specific components of the county's waste stream in the future(RW Beck 2007,KCSWD 2014a,and Normandeau 2017). Hundreds of companies are forming,developing new methods,obtaining patents,and improving waste conversion technology systems.Many universities,consultants,and organizations are conducting studies and producing 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 6-9 Att A Page 165 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Terms Waste conversion technologies are non-incineration technologies that use thermal,chemical,or biological processes,sometimes combined with mechanical processes,to convert the unrecycled portion of the municipal solid waste stream to electricity,fuels,and/or chemicals that can be used by industry. Incineration is a disposal method that converts waste materials into ash,flue gas,and heat using controlled flame combustion. Waste-to-energy technologies recover energy from municipal solid waste and include both waste conversion technologies and incineration with energy recovery,such as mass burn waste-to-energy, refuse-derived fuel,and advanced thermal recycling. Systems are unique technological methods for processing specified feedstock that are developed and patented by companies. Feedstock is the input material used by waste conversion and waste-to-energy technologies. reports,and partnerships are forming to fund,build,and operate facilities.Meanwhile,jurisdictions are undertaking rule-making efforts to define terms and establish regulations that both facilitate the development of sustainable technologies and protect the environment and the public.Waste conversion technologies are also now being defined separately from incineration,e.g.,"Waste conversion technologies are non-incineration technologies that are used to convert the non-recyclable portion of the municipal solid waste stream to electricity,fuels,and/or industrial chemical feedstocks"(SWANA 2011). Waste conversion technologies use thermal,biological,or chemical processes that are sometimes combined with mechanical processes.Technologies using a thermal process include pyrolysis,gasification,and plasma arc gasification.Hydrolysis/fermentation,anaerobic digestion,and aerobic composting use biological processes. Depolymerization uses a chemical process. The feedstock used by waste conversion technology systems can be municipal solid waste;selected materials removed from municipal solid waste,such as organics;or municipal solid waste combined with sewage sludge. Each system has unique requirements regarding the types,size,and amount of feedstock processed per day. Below is a sampling of conversion technologies,as described by Jeremy K.O'Brien of the Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA 2011).These technologies are not currently considered to have the capability to reliably and cost-effectively handle all the materials in the regional system. Gasification is a commercially proven manufacturing process that converts such hydrocarbons as coal, petroleum coke,biomass(such as wood and agricultural crops or wastes)and other organics to a synthesis gas(syngas),which can be further processed to produce chemicals,fertilizers,liquid fuels,hydrogen,and electricity.In a gasification facility,hydrocarbon feedstock is injected with air or oxygen and steam into a high- temperature,pressurized reactor until the chemical bonds of the feedstock are broken.The resulting reaction produces the syngas.The syngas is then cleansed to remove such impurities as sulfur,mercury,particulates, and trace minerals. 6-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 166 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Pyrolysis is a process that involves the thermal decomposition of feedstock at high temperatures (750°F-1,500°F) in the absence of air.The resulting end product is a mixture of solids (char),liquids(oxygenated oils),and gases(methane,carbon monoxide,and carbon dioxide).The oils and fuel gases can be used directly as boiler fuel or refined for higher-quality uses such as engine fuels,chemicals,adhesives,and other products. The solid residue contains most of the inorganic portion of the feedstock as well as large amounts of solid carbon or char. Plasma arc gasification technology is a heating method that can be used in both pyrolysis and gasification systems.This technology was developed for the metals industry in the late nineteenth century. Plasma arc technology uses very high temperatures (7,000°F)to break down the feedstock into elemental by-products. When municipal solid waste is processed,the intense heat actually breaks up the molecular structure of the organic material to produce such simpler gaseous molecules as carbon monoxide,hydrogen,and carbon dioxide.The inorganic material is vitrified to form a glassy residue. Anaerobic digestion is the bacterial breakdown of organics in the absence of oxygen. It can occur over a wide temperature range from 50°F to 160°F. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste can occur naturally,as in a landfill,or in a controlled environment,such as a municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion facility.In the latter,municipal solid waste is first processed for removal of inorganic and recyclable components,reduced in size,and then placed in an airtight vessel called a digester,where the process occurs. Biogas is one of the by-products of anaerobic digestion facility and it can be used as fuel for engines,gas turbines,fuel cells,boilers, and industrial heaters. It can also be used in other processes and in the manufacture of chemicals.Anaerobic digestion would be a good option when the food waste is separated at its source from other wastes. The division is committed to the continued exploration of these and other emerging technologies. In addition,the division is monitoring changing definitions,legislation and regulations,companies,and partnerships. Disposal of Special Wastes Most of the waste delivered to the division's facilities is municipal solid waste(garbage)from residential and non- residential sources.A portion of the waste stream,however,requires special handling and waste clearance before disposal because of legal,environmental,public health,or operational concerns.Of the approximately 800,000 to 1 million tons of solid waste disposed each year,between 6,000 and 9,000 tons is designated as special waste.These special items include industrial wastes;asbestos-containing materials;off-specification,recalled,or expired consumer products;over-sized materials;treatment plant grit and vactor wastes;and other miscellaneous materials. It does not include moderate risk wastes. The division continues to educate customers on the county's waste acceptance policies through public outreach materials and hands-on customer service.Since 1993,the division has conducted a waste screening program to ensure that materials in the waste stream are handled in accordance with federal and state regulations(Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,Title 40,Subtitle D and WAC 173-351).Under this program,waste screening technicians,in cooperation with other staff,perform random manual and visual screening of incoming loads of waste at each transfer facility and at Cedar Hills to identify and properly manage any potentially unacceptable wastes. About 11,000 loads of waste are screened at division facilities each year.Waste screening,combined with ongoing surveillance and control of incoming solid waste by transfer station and landfill operations staff,is a significant step in the county's solid waste enforcement program. In cases where special waste policies are repeatedly disregarded, division staff enforces compliance through a progressive process of warnings,citations,and eventually fines for improper disposal of special wastes. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 6-11 Att A Page 167 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Under the county's Waste Clearance Policy PUT 7-2-1(PR)and Waste Acceptance Rule PUT 7-1-6(PR),the Special Waste Unit provides a free service to customers to evaluate wastes and determine if they can be accepted for disposal and under what conditions.Special waste staff process and provide more than 400 waste clearances for disposal each year.Conditions for disposal could include wetting to control dust,bagging,hauling directly to the Cedar Hills landfill,specific packaging and labeling requirements,separation from other waste in a special waste disposal area,or certification of disposal by authorized landfill staff.Procedures for disposal of special waste are often defined by local, state,or federal regulation. The method for handling special wastes once the Cedar Hills landfill closes will be considered during the evaluation of alternative disposal options. Managing Illegal Dumping and Litter Managing municipal solid waste that is dumped on open ground is one of the division's responsibilities. Illegal dumping and litter can cause environmental contamination and pose both safety hazards and risks to public health. Addressing the issue of illegal dumping requires several coordinated programs and the participation of many county departments,the cities,and other agencies.The division manages or participates in programs that strive not only to reduce littering and illegal dumping on public and private property,but also to assist its victims. Illegal dumping Illegal dumping is a continuing problem for agencies,businesses,and the general public who find yard waste, appliances,car bodies,and other wastes dumped on their personal property,on public property,and on road rights of way.The division continues to lead the implementation of recommendations made in 2004 by a county task force charged with strengthening and coordinating the county's response to illegal dumping complaints. In 2008,the County Council adopted an ordinance to refine the county's role in enforcing laws that prohibit illegal dumping on public and private lands. The ordinance enhances the county's authority to cite and prosecute illegal dumpers. For example,it allows the county to charge a restitution fee to illegal dumpers and,in turn, -� 4 provide monetary relief to victims of the illegal ' dumping.The fee can be waived if the illegal dumper cleans up and properly disposes of4 the waste. Coordinating illegal dumping reporting and response through the Illegal Dumping Hotline ' (206-296-SITE) is a major element in the county's surveillance and control system for illegal dumping. Regional responsibilities for illegal dumping enforcement,clean up,and prevention arefII identified in Table 6-2. Clean-up of an illegal dumpsite 6-12 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 168 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 6-2. Illegal dumping clean-up responsibilities ResponsibilityEntity Washington State Department of Ecology Provides Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance-Community Litter Cleanup Program funding for cleanup to local agencies.Sets statewide policy. Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Responds to illegal dumping of materials where asbestos is suspected,such as some demolition materials,and addresses illegal dumping where incineration occurs. Public Health-Seattle&King County Primary enforcement agent for illegal dumping complaints on private property. Department of Planning and Provides code enforcement.Addressesjunk and debris on private property. Environmental Review Responds to complaints and removes illegally dumped materials from public roads and rights of way Road Services Division in unincorporated King County. Local Hazardous Waste Management Addresses illegal dumping and mishandling of potentially hazardous waste materials. Program Responds to complaints about illegal dumping and litter near county solid waste facilities and Solid Waste Division manages:programs for illegal dumping cleanup,the Illegal Dumping Hotline,county-wide illegal dumping prevention programs,and the junk vehicle program. Water and Lands Resources Division Investigates illegal dumping and litter complaints involving surface water. Enforce municipal littering and illegal dumping ordinances and provide cleanup of litter and illegally Cities dumped material from city streets and properties. The division also developed a program called the Community Cleanup Assistance Program,which enables environmental site inspectors from the county,cities,and other agencies to issue free disposal vouchers to property owners who are victims of illegal dumping. Community Litter Cleanup The division's Community Litter Cleanup Program,funded in part by a grant from Ecology,supports the cleanup of litter and illegal dumpsites on public lands and waterways in King County.The program also supports prevention and education,through advertising,signage,and other measures. In 2016,litter crews cleaned up over 176 tons of debris from 151 sites.About 17 percent of the debris—including items such as tires,appliances,and junk vehicles—was recycled. Secure Your Load In accordance with state law,since 1994 the division has assessed a fee to the drivers of vehicles with unsecured loads arriving at its staffed transfer facilities and landfill.An unsecured load has not been fastened in or attached to the vehicle with tarps,rope,straps,netting,or chains,so as to prevent any part of the load or the covering from becoming loose,detached,or leaving the vehicle while it is moving. 2019 ComprehenszveSolzd Waste Management Plan-july2028 6-13 Att A Page 169 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 According to the Washington State Department of Ecology's Focus on Secured Loads(Ecology 2009a),road debris causes about 400 accidents every year on Washington State highways and roughly 40 percent of litter on highways comes from unsecured loads. The requirement to secure loads is in the"Rules of the Road"(RCW 46.61.655),which is enforced by the Washington State Patrol.State law(RCW 70.93.097)and King County Code(Title 10.12.040) require the division to charge an unsecured-load fee,which is assessed by scale operators. In 2006,the division launched the Secure Your Load outreach program to raise public awareness of the importance of securing loads.The division has worked closely with the King County Sheriff's Office and the Washington State Patrol to enforce the law,and with Ecology and the Maria Federici Foundation to raise public awareness. In 2013,to strengthen its deterrent effect,the fee for an unsecured load arriving at a division facility was raised to$25.Division staff have received training from the Washington State Patrol to help them accurately identify unsecured loads and uniformly assess the fee.The increased fee for unsecured loads supports safe,clean communities. Disposal Services after an Emergency The King County Operational Disaster Debris Management Plan(Debris Management Plan)(KCSWD 2009) outlines the process for managing disaster debris within the boundaries of unincorporated King County and for coordinating with the 37 cities with which King County has interlocal agreements.The Debris Management Plan is aligned with other national,state,and county plans,including the 2014 King County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan,as well as regulations and policies that will affect how King County manages disaster debris. Debris management operations are grouped into three response levels-routine,medium,and high.The response level is determined by the division based on the geographic scope and impact of an actual or anticipated incident. Routine incidents are relatively common emergencies such as small landslides or minor flooding,which can be supported with existing resources and require minimal coordination. • Routine incidents are relatively common emergencies such as small landslides or minor flooding,which can be supported with existing resources and require minimal coordination. • Medium-impact incidents require more than routine coordination,and generally involve multiple jurisdictions. These include incidents such as moderate earthquakes,minor or moderate flooding in multiple locations,and storms with snow,ice,and/or high winds.The situation may require mutual aid or contract resources,and it may be necessary for the King County Executive to proclaim an emergency. • High-impact incidents require a high degree of coordination and generally involve requests for state and federal assistance.These include incidents such as large earthquakes,severe flooding,or severe storms.In most cases, an emergency will have already been proclaimed by the King County Executive. A regional approach to planning is essential for managing the multi-jurisdictional impacts of emergencies in the Puget Sound area and for coordinating the limited disposal capacity in western Washington.This disposal capacity is subject to two major constraints.First,most jurisdictions in the region export their solid waste to landfills east of the Cascade Mountains.Without local landfill space,disposal capacity relies on the region's transportation network,which could be compromised in a major emergency.Second,the only operational landfill in King County-Cedar Hills-does not accept for disposal construction and demolition debris-the most common aftermath of high-impact incidents- only municipal solid waste. 6-14 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 170 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 The coordinated regional Debris Management Plan emphasizes recycling to the extent possible.The plan calls for the use of temporary debris management sites for storage of debris until it can be sorted for recycling or proper disposal. The division has worked with the King County Regional Communications and Emergency Coordination Center to coordinate public information and help cities and residents identify recycling options in preparation for and in response to emergency events of all types. The ability to respond after a major regional emergency is one criterion that will be used to select a disposal option to be used once the Cedar Hills landfill closes. Restoration of Closed Landfills The division is responsible for maintaining and monitoring closed landfills that were constructed under different standards than those that guide landfill development today.Depending on the year the landfill closed,a minimum maintenance and monitoring post-closure period is specified in the Washington Administrative Code,but the timeline is not definite in state law.Although most of the closed landfills have reached the end of the required minimum post-closure period,regulations and the understanding of closure requirements have changed,requiring ongoing maintenance and monitoring.See Figure 6-1 for the location of the closed landfills. Post-Closure Monitoring and Maintenance At seven of the nine closed landfills,the division routinely monitors groundwater,surface water,wastewater,and landfill gas.The Bow Lake and Corliss landfills were excavated to build new transfer stations on site,so very little,if any,waste is left and monitoring is no longer necessary.Studies are underway at the Vashon,Cedar Falls, Hobart,and Enumclaw landfills to determine what additional actions are needed for these landfills to reach a stable state.When a stable state has been reached,post-closure activities at these landfills may be reduced or terminated. Under the current monitoring program,sampling data are collected from more than 180 groundwater,surface water,and wastewater monitoring stations,and approximately 100 landfill gas monitoring stations.These data are summarized in quarterly and annual reports submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology and Public Health.Public Health also routinely inspects all of the closed landfills. The closed landfills were constructed under different standards than those that guide landfill development today.With the exception of portions of the Vashon landfill constructed after 1989,they are unlined and do not,in some cases, incorporate all of the environmental control systems present in a modern landfill.Thus,the unique characteristics of each site-in particular ` the underlying geology,what lies downstream, and the waste that was originally placed in the landfill-play an important role in the post-closure needs of the site.These factors also influence the need for ongoing monitoring and maintenance of the existing landfill control systems.Since all but the Vashon closed landfill have reached the end 2019 Compre&2szveSolzd Waste Management Plan-july2028 6-15 Att A Page 171 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Figure 6-1. Map of closed landfills Corliss Duvall ' L.F i l Cedar Hills Regional Landfillx, _ r;• „ 169 - Vashon Cedar Falls® Bow Lake 78 f . Hobart Puyallup/Kit Corner 169 +C Enumclaw King County solid waste facilities Uxi6 Open landfill Closed landfill +E King County Boundary Q Cities 0 2 4 8 Unincorporated Area Miles 1-7 6-16 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 172 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 of their required post-closure periods,each is being evaluated to determine what actions are required to bring the landfill to a stable state.In some cases,there may be no need to continue monitoring;at other sites,monitoring may continue at a reduced frequency and for a reduced range of constituents found in the medium being tested. When the Cedar Hills landfill reaches capacity and closes,the bottom liner,capped top,and extensive gas and water control systems will inhibit releases to the environment for many years.Applicable regulations will define the minimum post-closure period (currently 30 years).Landfill closure is guided by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Title 40,Subtitle D, Part 258,Subpart F-Closure and Post-Closure Care,as well as Washington Administrative Code 173-351.The post-closure period may be shortened or lengthened based on the perceived risk to human health and the environment.After the post-closure period,there is expected to be some reduced level of monitoring and care to ensure the integrity of the cap and other environmental controls. Beneficial Reuse of Landfill Properties The county continues to examine possibilities for the beneficial reuse of closed landfill properties.While the presence of landfill control systems at these landfills can limit the types of beneficial reuse projects that can be implemented, such as at the Enumclaw landfill,the county has been successful in converting several properties wholly or in part to new purposes.Future beneficial uses also could create revenue opportunities. Houghton landfill-Athletic fields were developed on the former Houghton landfill area. Hobart landfill-Model airplane enthusiasts and an astronomy club use the open spaces of the Hobart landfill. Duvall landfill-The county installed an 800-MHz radio tower outside of the refuse boundary of the Duvall landfill as part of its Emergency Communications Project. Cedar Falls,Duvall,and Puyallup/Kit Corner landfills-Walking and cycling trails in the property buffers are used by area communities. Other beneficial uses The open spaces at closed landfills, often grassy areas surrounded by m � woods,provide habitat for diverse a : ; species of plants and animals.Closed k r landfills that currently provide homes C "� to healthy populations of wildlife are Cedar Falls, Duvall, Hobart, Houghton, Puyallup/Kit Corner,and Vashon. Grass covers have been placed over all the landfills,engineered to suit the naturally occurring features and areas of potential enhancement at the properties.Vegetative covers at the Duvall and Puyallup/Kit Corner properties include planted trees and Vegetative cover at the Duvall landfill 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 6-17 Att A Page 173 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 other vegetation to improve ground cover and water quality,as well as perches and nesting boxes for hawks and owls. The Cedar Falls and Duvall landfills are near the headwaters of large streams and provide cover and a source of food for birds,deer,coyote,and other woodland animals.Managing these properties as green space helps support the county's goals and policies for habitat preservation and increases carbon sequestration (i.e.,reduces the total carbon emissions)at the properties. Finding reuse opportunities for the closed landfill properties provides continued benefit to the surrounding communities,but the uses need to be compatible with the ongoing environmental monitoring at the sites.The division continues to explore beneficial reuse options for closed landfills,such as alternative energy farms(solar and wind)and sustainable forestry. 6-18 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 174 ._...... ,tea" i r �� .. � Y^rye+•��ne m .. la Iu r + NY B r � r u n 01 aste Y stem lna.� �� e �m= m� 1 Y P ` m fl vs"• h. Page 176 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Policies /F-1 Keep tipping fees as low as reasonable,while covering the costs of effectively managing the system,protecting the environment, encouraging recycling and providing service to customers. Att A Page 177 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions The following table includes a menu of recommended actions that the county and the cities should implement.Under the responsibility column,the entity listed first has primary responsibility for the action,bold indicates that the entity has responsibility for the action,and a star(*) indicates that the action is a priority. If the responsibility is not in bold,the action has lower implementation priority. • Detailed .- . Action Discussion •• • Adopt the following as divisionpractices: • Assess fees for use of the solid waste transfer and disposal system at the point of service. • The fee charged to customer classes will be the same at Page 7-3 all facilities,unless the Metropolitan King County Council determines a change in the rate structure is necessary to maintain service levels,comply with regulations and permits,or to address low income needs. • Utilize the assets of the King County Solid Waste Division Page 7-9 consistent with the conditions established in the Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement with the cities. • The County General Fund will not charge use fees or receive other Page 7-1 consideration from the Solid Waste Division for use of any transfer facility property in use as of November 6,2013.The division's use of assets acquired by other separate County funds is subject to use fees. If the division ceases to use a property,all proceeds from the sale or other use of such property are due to the owner of record. • Maintain reserve funds and routinely evaluate the funds for long- Page 7-5 term adequacy and set contributions to maintain reasonable rate stability. • Finance capital projects using an appropriate combination of cash Page 7-6 and debt depending upon the life of the asset,financial benefits such as rate stability,and interest rates. • Use solid waste fees to fund mitigation payments to cities for Page 7-5 impacts directly attributable to solid waste facilities per Revised Code of Washington 36.58.080 and the Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement. • Use solid waste fees to fund required mitigation for solid waste Page 7-5 facilities,including mitigation mandated by federal,state,and local regulations and permits. Att A Page 178 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions • Continue to evaluate and implement fiscally responsible operational changes to support a sustainable business model and maintain the assets of the solid waste facilities. Page 7-8 • Include a target fund balance in the Solid Waste Division financial plan equal to at least 30 days of operating expenses. Page 7-7 • Establish a minimum balance in the Rate Stabilization Reserve to mitigate the risks associated with a moderate-level economic recession. Page 7-7 • Maintain the Landfill Post-Closure Maintenance Fund at a level to ensure that environmental monitoring and maintenance of the closed landfills will be fully funded through the end of their regulated post-closure maintenance periods,as defined by applicable law. Page 7-6 Maintain a Solid Waste Division financial forecast and cash-flow projection of four years or more. Page 7-3 Subject to approval from the Metropolitan King County Council, define customer classes and establish equitable fees for each customer class based on services provided,benefits received,use of Page 7-9 the system,and the costs,incurred or avoided,of providing those services. Consider alternatives to the current rate methodology,such as llu�lll��l� Page 7-9 incorporating a transaction fee into the rate structure. Study the cost of providing services to self-haul customers,and to other customer classes if needed. Page 7-9 Consider discounts for low-income customers consistent with RCW 81.77.195. Page 7-10 Continue to explore new revenue sources to help finance the solid i�l��l� „ ,� �:::• Page 7-10 waste system. iil1hl The Executive may establish an Environmental Reserve Fund with Page 7-7 revenue from solid waste fees for the benefit of the signatories to the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement. Develop the procedures to establish and maintain the Rate Page 7-7 Stabilization Reserve. Att A Page 179 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Summary of Recommended Actions Action Detailed MI 44-f 71�1 Action Discussion Maintain the following solid waste funds: Page 7-6 • Landfill Reserve, • Landfill Post-Closure Maintenance, • Capital Equipment Recovery Program,and • Construction Fund. u When possible,manage solid waste rates through smaller,more Page 7-3 frequent increases,which in combination with the rate stabilization reserve,smooths rate increases over time. Att A Page 180 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 lid Waste System Finance 1-11, Financial policies help guide the solid waste system's operations and investments.This chapter first provides a brief summary of the division's financial structure,including descriptions of funding sources,revenues,and expenditures. The remainder of the chapter describes a range of influences expected to have a financial impact on the division in the future. Funding of Solid Waste Services and Programs King County's solid waste transfer and disposal system is a public-sector operation that is funded almost entirely by fees collected from its customers.The division is an enterprise fund,managing nearly all of its expenses with revenues earned through these fees. The fees charged at county facilities,called tipping fees, i pay for the operation and maintenance of transfer and disposal facilities and equipment,education and promotion related to waste prevention and recycling,grants to cities to support waste prevention and recycling efforts,and administrative operating expenses and overhead. r E� Tipping fees also pay for the construction of transfer facilities. Bonds or loans may be used for large projects,but repayment of this debt is funded by tipping fees. As discussed later in this chapter,through transfers into i reserve funds,the fee paid for each ton of waste entering the system today covers the expenses involved in disposal of that waste,even if some costs are incurred decades in the future.Using this financial structure ensures that the full cost of solid waste handling is paid by the users of the system. A summary of the fund structure is illustrated in Figure 7-1 �. and discussed in the following sections. Customers pay a tipping fee at the scalehouse 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 7-1 Att A Page 181 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 v -0 M � � C c 3 (v i LL O u O H N 4 v _ _ _ C I uIA W tG C C f+ C C 0 M > f0 p No .� N Np O V O u F w O O N 6 N N C O > Co •- 1 1 V .. ° LL J O_ E C w M O al N iF � M N > �^ t0 LL 0. 3 C C > O O p O LL O y O N '^ Q N _ O Y •O i n v C w N _ M W > O .. Y 2 N +�' � r 'O , V N C M O C = CN .v N N 'C C C Q OC v � E m Z �i V V `O V i6 g V .2O U M w o E M N to O 'G O -0 C r 7 C N H d £ ,� V tA LL r N C V N r N c o > � E E a O c O a O ° — >i = to 0) v v t r 0 V R W — u " `6CU 0 N N 41 t6 t6 t6 C i cc� al > d y i 4J -0 7 T IL O 20 3: r6 J U a G L- W Q y, N C l) O W 2 m U 2 0 • Q. C . . . . N i 3 O to D H LL 2 r v I a E tv 2 -0 M �j 01 N cp N T m N C .0 T N u O O M U. tp Cu C N £ V O Im O 0 U. w m C -Q A (u 3 , i N .� tp f+ J V A r r . w th O L V to in D co N O •Q' V C i C ( i V N tV H L O V O H E to 7-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 182 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 How Cities Fund Solid Waste Programs Cities fund their solid waste and waste prevention and recycling programs in a variety of ways,and the resources available to the 37 cities in the King County system vary widely.Some cities receive revenue from fees paid for solid waste collection services.These fees may be paid directly to the city or to the collection company depending on who provides the collection service-the city itself or a commercial collection company-and what contractual arrangements have been made. In some cases,the collection companies charge a fee that is passed on to the city to fund their programs.Some cities also charge a utility tax.Another funding source for cities is state and county grants(see Chapter 4,Sustainable Materials Management for more information about grants).For cities that do not receive any revenue from collection,the only revenue sources for funding waste prevention and recycling programs may be grants and the city's general fund. Solid Waste Division Revenues As mentioned earlier,the solid waste system is funded primarily by the tipping fees charged at division facilities. The tipping fee is charged to the commercial collection companies that collect materials curbside and to residential and business self-haulers who bring wastes to the transfer facilities themselves. In accordance with KCC 10.08.040, the County Council establishes the fees charged at county solid waste facilities. There are four main types of tipping fees: Basic Fee-The per-ton fee charged to customers disposing of municipal solid waste at transfer facilities and to curbside collection vehicles at the Cedar Hills landfill.The basic fee accounts for about 97 percent of tipping fee revenues. Regional Direct Fee-A discounted fee charged to commercial collection companies that haul solid waste to Cedar Hills in transfer trailers from their own transfer stations and processing facilities,thus bypassing county transfer stations. Yard Waste and Clean Wood Fee-A fee for separated yard waste and clean wood delivered to facilities that have separate collection areas for these materials. Special Waste Fee- The fee charged for certain materials that require special handling,record keeping,or both,such as asbestos-containing materials and contaminated soil. There are two different special waste fees that reflect the greater or lesser expense involved in handling and tracking different materials. Other fees are charged for recyclables,such as appliances. KCC 10.12.021.G authorizes the division director to set fees for recyclable materials for which no fee has yet been established by ordinance.These fees may be set to encourage recycling and need not recover the full cost of handling and processing. In accordance with state law(RCW 70.93.097), the division also charges a fee to vehicles with unsecured loads arriving at any staffed King County transfer facility or the Cedar Hills landfill. Figure 7-2 shows the breakdown of revenues as projected for 2017 and 2018 in the 2016 Rate Study.As shown,about 90 percent of the division's revenue comes from tipping fees.The remainder of the division's revenue comes from a 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 7-3 Att A Page 183 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 few additional sources.The most significant of those is the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program (LHWMP). Other sources of revenue include revenue from the sale of landfill gas from the Cedar Hills landfill;interest earned on fund balances;recyclables revenue,including revenue from both the sale of scrap metals received at division transfer facilities and from a fee on recyclables collected in unincorporated areas;fees collected from construction and demolition disposal;income from rental properties;fees collected on unincorporated area curbside accounts to support waste prevention and recycling education;and Washington State Department of Ecology grants to help clean up litter and illegal dumping throughout the county,as well as to support waste prevention and recycling. Based on economic and market conditions,revenues from these sources and interest earned can vary considerably. Figure 7-2. Projected sources of revenue 2017 and 2018 1 % 3% 1 % Disposal Fees Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Fees Landfill Gas-To-Energy SWD Other Revenues-grants,interests,and other income Recycling Revenues- including construction and demolition disposal fees Construction and Demolition Debris Surcharge Starting in September 2015,management of the county's construction and demolition waste changed. In the past,the division had contracts with two private companies-Republic Services and Waste Management-to manage the majority of the county's construction and demolition debris.Under the new system,the division designates qualified facilities to accept and process construction and demolition debris. In 2016,the division banned disposal of construction and demolition materials that have stable recycling markets.As future markets develop,more materials may also be banned.Materials that are brought to a designated facility for processing,but cannot be recycled,will incur a$4.25 per ton disposal surcharge that will be payable to the division.This system is designed to encourage recycling of construction and demolition materials.For more information,see Chapter 4, Sustainable Materials Management. 7-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 184 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Solid Waste Division Expenditures Division expenditures,can be divided into four broad categories:operating costs,support service costs,debt service, and transfers to other solid waste funds.The division maintains a target fund balance-an average balance in the Operating Fund sufficient to cover 30 days of direct operating expenses.Operating expenses are defined to exclude reserve funds.A rate stabilization reserve allows the accrual of funds to smooth out rate increases over time. Figure 7-3 uses 2017-2018 projections to illustrate the various division expenditures,which are described in the following sections: Figure 7-3. 2017 Budgeted expenditures • I I 4h • I I Operating Costs Other Solid Waste Funds I Debt Services 63% Support Services Operating Costs Operating costs,which constitute the majority of all division spending,include the day-to-day expenses for transfer, transport,and landfill operations,maintenance of equipment and facilities,and management of landfill gas and wastewater.Operating costs also include business and occupation tax,and an emergency contingency to cover some costs related to weather-related events or other small emergencies.In addition,all but one of the closed landfills have met the obligatory number of years of post-closure care,but have on-going needs for monitoring and maintenance. Since the post-closure period has expired and maintenance and monitoring is still required,those projects are now funded by the Operating Fund. Also included in the operating costs category is the rent that the division pays to the county's General Fund for use of the landfill property. Rent is based on a fair market property appraisal.An appraisal by Murray&Associates in 2012 determined a rent payment schedule for 2015 through 2025.Also included in operation costs are mitigation paid to cities for impacts directly attributable to solid waste facilities(RCW 36.58.080)as well as other mitigation related to construction or other activities as required by federal,state,and local regulations and permits.Similar to the cities' authorization to receive mitigation,and due to the longer life of the Landfill,the Road Services Division of the Department of Local Services will study the ability to charge the Solid Waste Division to mitigate impacts directly attributable to the regional facility,including wear and tear on nearby roads. Another expense in this category is recycling costs.This includes grants to the cities and other waste prevention and recycling programs and services provided by the division. 7-5 Att A Page 185 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Support Service Costs This cost category includes functions that support operations,such as engineering,overhead,finance,administration, and planning. Debt Service Debt service is the payment of interest and principal on bonds and loans.Major transfer facility capital projects are generally financed by a combination of general obligation (GO) bonds backed by the full faith and credit of the county's General Fund and rate dollars in the Construction Fund. It is anticipated that with approval of the County Council,GO bonds will be issued for future transfer facility capital projects. Repayment of the debt will not extend beyond,and may be less than,the useful life of the facility.Additional factors that may be considered include but are not limited to:changes in disposal method,length of the ILA,bond market/bond rates,and waste generation. To date,Cedar Hills landfill capital projects are not funded through debt financing,but through the Landfill Reserve Fund discussed later in this section. Transfers to Other Solid Waste Funds Transfers from the Operating Fund to reserve funds make up a portion of the division's costs.These reserve funds were established to ensure that the division can meet future obligations,or expenses,some of which are mandated by law.Contributions to reserve funds are routinely evaluated to ensure they are adequate to meet short-and long- term needs. Paying into reserve funds stabilizes the impact on rates for certain expenses by spreading the costs over a longer time period,and ensures that customers who use the system pay the entire cost of disposal.The three reserve funds-the Capital Equipment Recovery Program Fund,the Landfill Reserve Fund,and the Post-Closure Maintenance Fund-are discussed below. Bond proceeds and contributions from the Operating Fund to the Construction Fund are used to finance new construction and major maintenance of division transfer facilities and some closed landfill mitigation projects. Contributions from the Operating Fund to the Construction Fund result in less borrowing,and consequently,a lower level of debt service. The Capital Equipment Recovery Program Fund (CERP) is codified in KCC 4A.200.680.The purpose of the CERP is to provide adequate resources for replacement and major maintenance of solid waste rolling stock(primarily long-haul trucks and trailers)and stationary compactors. New equipment is purchased from the Operating Fund, but after the initial purchase,replacements are funded from the CERP. By accumulating funds in the CERP,the division is able to cover the expense of replacing needed equipment without impacting rates,even while revenue fluctuates.Annual contributions to the CERP are calculated by projecting future replacement costs,salvage values,and equipment -.. life.Contributions are adjusted to reflect changes in facilities and operations that affect equipment needs.The contributions are held in an account, earning interest,until needed. The CERP Fund provides resources for replacement and major The Landfill Reserve Fund(LRF),codified in maintenance of equipment KCC 4A.200.390,covers the costs of four major accounts maintained for the Cedar Hills landfill,which are described on the following page: 7-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 186 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • New area development account-Covers the costs for planning,designing,permitting,and building new disposal areas. • Facility improvements account-Covers a wide range of capital investments required to sustain the infrastructure and operations at the landfill,such as enhancements to the landfill gas and wastewater systems. • Closure account-Covers the cost of closing operating areas within the landfill that have reached capacity. Mandated by federal and state law,these contributions help the division prepare incrementally for the cost of final closure of the entire landfill. • Post-closure maintenance account-Accumulates funds to pay for post-closure maintenance of the Cedar Hills landfill for 30 years.This account is also mandated by federal and state law. The sum of all four accounts,based on projected cost obligations,makes up the LRF contribution from the Operating Fund.Projected cost obligations are based on the current plan for the landfill.When Cedar Hills closes,the division will discontinue its contributions to the LRF.After final closure,the balance of the LRF will be transferred to the Post- Closure Maintenance Fund to pay for Cedar Hills'post-closure maintenance and monitoring. The Post-Closure Maintenance Fund,codified in KCC 4A.200.710,is a separate fund that pays for the maintenance and environmental monitoring of the Vashon landfill-the only closed landfill that is still within the regulatory period set in 40 CFR 258.61 and Washington Administrative Code 173-351-600(see Chapter 6,Landfill Management and Solid Waste Disposal). In addition to the funds mentioned above,the division is investigating the establishment of an Environmental Reserve,as discussed in the Amended and Restated ILA.The purpose of such a fund would be to help to pay for any environmental liabilities not already covered by system rates or insurance.The fund would be retained for a minimum of 30 years following the closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill. Target Fund Balance ' The division's current practice is to retain an average balance in the operating fund sufficient to cover at least 30 days of direct operating costs. A stormwater pond at the Cedar Hills Landfi II is part of the Minimum Rate Stabilization Reserve infrastructure paid for by the Facility Improvements Account FCS Group conducted a rate structure analysis (KCSWD 2017d),and reported that the division suffered an 11 percent reduction in Basic Fee revenue over a two-year period during the Great Recession. For comparison,during the more moderate 2001 Dot-Com Bust, Basic Fee revenue decreased by four percent in that two-year period. To mitigate the risks associated with a moderate-level economic recession,holding five percent of annual revenues as a minimum Rate Stabilization Reserve balance would provide for a moderate-level recession slightly more severe than the Dot-Com Bust,but not for an outlier like the Great Recession. Preparing for two years of reduced revenues fits with the County's two-year budgeting cycle.Presumably,the Council would be able to pass any needed recession response measures within two years,and the division would not need to carry excessive reserves.The division is developing specific procedures for maintaining recession reserve monies to include access to and replenishment of funds. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 187 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Influences on Future Costs and Revenue In addition to the unanticipated increases or reductions in tonnage due to the economy,there are other factors that can be expected to influence costs and revenues.These factors,which can be projected and budgeted for with varying degrees of certainty,are summarized below. Interest Earnings The division's reserve funds are invested to earn interest during the years,or even decades,before the funds are needed.This is particularly significant for the long-term Landfill Reserve Fund,which will finance landfill closure and 30 years of post-closure care,a period expected to run from about 2028(the currently approved capacity)through 2058,or if expanded capacity is approved,for about 30 years after Cedar Hills reaches its maximum disposal capacity, making interest earnings a considerable factor in the amount that needs to be put aside. In 2013,the value of interest earned was less than inflation.Starting in 2018,a small increase in interest above inflation is expected through 2026. The county is looking at how the funds might be invested differently consistent with County guidelines to earn a higher rate of return. Waste Prevention and Recycling As discussed earlier,revenues from garbage tipping fees cover the costs of waste prevention and recycling services and programs.This financing structure requires the division to estimate the effects of waste prevention and recycling on garbage disposal to reasonably project future revenues. While the revenue stream relies primarily on garbage tipping fees,the current priorities in solid waste management are waste prevention and recycling,which lead to reductions in the amount of solid waste disposed and therefore in revenues received.The reduction in the amount of waste received due to waste prevention,recycling and product stewardship has been gradual,and the system has adjusted to lower revenues. Further reductions through increasingly rigorous waste prevention and recycling efforts will continue to affect the revenues of King County and other jurisdictions across the state.The state's Moving Washington Beyond Waste and Toxics,2015 Update recognizes that,"Local governments in particular are concerned about how to sustain funding for programs when the goal is to reduce waste disposal,the source of most funding"(Ecology 2015). The county completed a Sustainable Solid Waste Management Study(KCSWD 2014a)that looked at multiple strategies,technologies and services that the division could employ to increase recycling and manage solid waste.One of the strategies suggested by the study is to develop a sustainable financing model that is aligned with waste prevention and recycling (KCSWD 2014a). Increased waste prevention and recycling efforts have had positive influences on the financial aspects of the system as well.As discussed in Chapters 4 and 6,waste prevention and recycling have contributed to extending the life of the Cedar Hills landfill,which will save money for ratepayers.Another aspect of waste prevention and recycling that has had a positive financial effect is product stewardship.Product stewardship shifts the management of materials at the end of their life to the product manufacturer.This shift reduces the costs to cities and counties of managing products such as televisions,computers,and fluorescent bulbs and tubes,to name a few.The savings are most substantial for products that contain hazardous materials and are more difficult and expensive to manage within the public collection,transfer,and disposal system. 7-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 188 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Operational Efficiencies The division continually seeks to eliminate waste and variability in its operations.This commitment ensures the division's ability to provide value to its customers,while improving the quality of service,controlling costs,and upholding the county's environmental goals. Examples of operational efficiencies that are producing significant and long-term results are discussed briefly below. 3W"' Landfill Tippers The division uses tippers to empty garbage from transfer trailers at the landfill.The tippers Landfi replaced the use of older walking floor trailers (see Chapter 5,Landfill Management and Solid Waste Disposal,for more details).Tippers save staff time and other resources,as well as reduce equipment and tire damage. Solid Waste and Cardboard Compactors As discussed in Chapter 4,the transfer system in King County is undergoing major renovations to update station technology,improve efficiencies,and enhance environmental sustainability.The installation of solid waste compactors is one important component of that plan.The Bow Lake, Enumclaw,Shoreline, Factoria,and Vashon stations currently have waste compactors.All newly constructed recycling and transfer stations will incorporate compactors as well. Compacting solid waste at the stations reduces the number of trips necessary to transport the waste by up to 30 percent.Fewer trips translate directly into lower costs for fuel,equipment,and staff. For instance,in the first six months of operation at the Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station,the use of a compactor saved almost 900 trips and over 8,400 gallons of diesel fuel. In addition to solid waste compactors,the division is installing cardboard compactors at many of the stations.These compactors will allow the division to reduce the number of trips needed to pick up the bales. Potential Changes in the Fee Structure The division may propose changes to the current fee structure in future rate studies. Possible changes include establishing different customer classes,discounts for low income customers,and moving some costs from the fee charged at transfer facilities and the landfill to a fee on the curbside collection bill.In the 2014 Sustainable Solid Waste Management Study(KCSWD 2014),one of the recommendations was to look at revising the fee structure.The division completed a rate restructure study in 2017 and will be discussing with stakeholders what a rate restructure might entail (KCSWD 2017d). To equitably allocate the benefits and costs of transfer system improvements,the division may consider different customer classes.The customer classes would take into consideration the services provided,benefits received,use of the system,and the costs(incurred or avoided),of providing those services.An example of a customer class would be self-haul customers or commercial customers at the transfer stations. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 7-9 Att A Page 189 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 In 2010,legislation was passed authorizing the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission to approve discounts for low-income customers under certain circumstances.For the first time,the division is proposing a low- income discount in its 2019-2020 Rate Proposal (KCSWD 2018b). Before changes to the fee structure are proposed,the division is studying a number of factors,including the impact on revenue and cost,equity issues,and system-wide financing implications.These factors will be considered in future rate studies. Closure of the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill When Cedar Hills reaches capacity and closes,the division's solid waste tipping fee is expected to increase to cover the cost of using an alternate means of disposal.Whether it is export to an out-of-county landfill,disposal at a waste- to-energy facility,or other conversion technology,past studies,as well as a recent preliminary study,indicate that the cost for disposal after Cedar Hills closes will be higher(KCSWD 2017c) (see Chapter 6,Landfill Management and Solid Waste Disposal for further discussion). New Revenue Sources The division is continually exploring new sources of revenue to help offset reductions in tonnage.Cities may also want to consider additional funding sources to support their solid waste and waste prevention and recycling programs. Sales from the Landfill Gas-to- Energy Facility An example of the successful development of a revenue source is the sale of landfill gas.In 2009, a landfill gas-to-energy facility began operations at Cedar Hills,and the division began to receive revenues from the sale of landfill gas.The facility, which is privately owned and operated by Bio , Energy Washington,converts methane collected from the landfill into pipeline quality natural gas, which it sells to Puget Sound Energy. In addition,the environmental attributes from the pipeline quality gas produced by the landfill The Bio Energy Washington plant at Cedar Hills landfill converts gas-to-energy facility at Cedar Hills have value landfill gas to pipeline quality gas in the market and offer another ongoing source of revenue.The division,rather than the owner of the landfill gas facility,Bio Energy Washington,has contractually retained the environmental attributes associated with the project. In January of 2011,the County Council unanimously approved an ordinance authorizing the division to enter into a contract to sell the environmental attributes associated with the landfill gas-to-energy project to Puget Sound Energy.This contract is structured so 7-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 190 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 that the county shares in profits that Puget Sound Energy gets when selling the environmental attributes associated with the gas.The division receives revenue for both the gas and the environmental attributes associated with the gas. The revenue received by the division is highly volatile,and has ranged from $1 to$7 million per year,depending on production rates and the market price. Resource Recovery at Transfer Stations Significant amounts of recyclable materials—notably wood,metal and cardboard-are disposed at the transfer stations.The division is implementing new approaches,such as sorting the recyclable materials on the tipping floor and banning certain materials from disposal,to recover more of these materials at the transfer stations. Revenues from the sale of these materials help offset the costs of sorting and equipment.(see Chapter 5,Solid Waste Transfer and Processing System for further discussion). Fees from Materials Collected at the Transfer Stations King County Code(KCC 1 0.12.021.G)does not require that fees for recyclables recover the full costs of handling and processing recyclable materials.Therefore the fees can be set lower to encourage recycling over disposal. In fact, for materials such as the standard curbside recyclables collected at the transfer stations,there is currently no fee at all,even though the division pays the cost of transport and processing.As collection services for more recyclable materials are added at transfer facilities and more tons of materials are recycled,fees will be evaluated on a regular basis and adjusted as necessary to optimize the financial and environmental benefits. The division will continue to explore innovative opportunities,such as partnering with the private sector or other public agencies,to earn additional revenues and achieve savings through operational efficiencies. Although,these efforts may involve relatively small amounts of money,cumulatively they contribute to stabilizing rates for solid waste customers. 2019 ComprebenszveSolzd Waste 2wanagementPlan-ju1y2028 7-11 Att A Page 191 ated April 17,20 + w R a ' " 1% polo—Aggo AILn r "iN -15 fig_ �r 0.9 61 1 a ' �p Oe . 411 0 �. � ,e� std •rr� +� c� v q " or {,� ` Ordinance 18893 b -ILL Referep. r ---------- ............. .......... .. ...... 01 � yh u A A w" �f x 0 w skM� r b y, s. �. r;.-•,.�, Att A Page 193 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Rekrencces Cascadia.2006.2006 Material Recovery Facility(MRF)Assessment. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group, Inc.,Seattle,WA. Cascadia.2009a.2007/2008 Construction and Demolition Materials Characterization Study. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group,Seattle,WA. http://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/waste-monitoring/waste-documents.aspx Cascadia.2012a. King County Waste Monitoring Program:2011 Waste Characterization Study. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group,Seattle,WA. http://www.kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/documents/waste-characterization-study-2011. ashx?la=en Cascadia.2012b.Organics Characterization Report. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group,Seattle,WA.(http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/garbage-recycling/documents/Organics- Characterization-report-2012.pdf) Cascadia.2015a.Waste Monitoring Program:Market Assessment for Recyclable Materials in King County. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group, Inc.,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/documents/waste-monitoring-market-assessment-2015.pdf Cascadia.2015b. King County Waste Monitoring Program:2015 Waste Characterization and Customer Survey Report. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group,Seattle,WA. http://kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/documents/waste-characterization-study-2015. ashx?la=en Cascadia.2016.Transfer Station Customer Survey. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/documents/customer-survey-2016.pdf Cascadia.2017a. King County LinkUp Program 2017 Market Assessment. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group,Seattle,WA. http://kingcounty.gov/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/programs/linkup/documents.aspx Cascadia.2017b. King County 2017 Targeted Business Characterization Report. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group,Seattle,WA. http://www.kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/documents/business-characterization-2017. ashx?la=en 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july2018 $'1 Att A Page 194 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 City of Seattle. 1998/2004.On the Path to Sustainability and 2004 Plan Amendment.City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities,WA.(A draft update to this plan is posted here: http://www.seattle.gov/util/MyServices/Garbage/AboutGarbage/SolidWastePlans/Solid WasteManagementPlan/ index.htm) Ecology.2004. Background Paper for Beyond Waste Summary Document Financing Solid Waste for the Future. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0407032.pdf Ecology.2009b. Focus on Secured Loads.Washington State Department of Ecology.Olympia,WA. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/0907020.pdf Ecology.2015.The State Solid and Hazardous Waste Plan.Moving Beyond Waste and Toxics,2015 Update.Washington State Department of Ecology,Olympia,WA. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/wasteplan GBB.2007. Independent,Third Party Review of the Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Export System Plan. Prepared for the King County Council by Gershman, Brickner&Bratton, Inc., Fairfax,VA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/documents/solid-waste-transfer-export-review.pdf KCSWD.Updated monthly.Solid Waste Advisory Committee Web Page. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/swac.asp KCSWD.Updated monthly.Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee Web Page. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/mswmac.asp KCSWD.2002.2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/comp-plan.asp KCSWD and ITSG.2004.Transfer System Level of Service Evaluation Criteria and Standards. Prepared by the King County Solid Waste Division and Interjurisdictional Technical Staff Group,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/documents-planning.asp KCSWD.2005a.Analysis of System Needs and Capacity:Using the Transfer System Level of Service Evaluation Criteria and Standards. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/documents-planning.asp KCSWD.2005b.Options for Public and Private Ownership of Transfer and Intermodal Facilities:Using the Transfer System Level of Service Evaluation Criteria and Standards. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/documents-planning.asp 8-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 195 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 KCSWD.2006a. Preliminary Transfer&Waste Export Facility Recommendations and Estimated System Costs, Rate Impacts&Financial Policy Assumptions. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/documents-planning.asp KCSWD.2006b.Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan and associated Environmental Impact Statement. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/documents-planning.asp KCSWD et al.2008a.Commercial Customer Evaluation of Waste Densities&Food Waste Recycling Impacts. King County Solid Waste Division,City of Kirkland,Waste Management, Inc.,and Sound Resources Management Group, Inc.,WA. KCSWD et al.2008b.Sustainable Curbside Collection Pilot. Prepared by the King County Solid Waste Division,City of Renton, Public Health-Seattle&King County,and Waste Management, Inc. https://kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/garbage-recycling/documents/Renton_Residential_Pilot_ Report.ashx?la=en KCSWD.2009a. Draft King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. King County Solid Waste Division, Seattle,WA. KCSWD.2009b. King County Operational Disaster Debris Management Plan. King County Solid Waste Division, Seattle,WA. KCSWD.2010a. Final Environmental Impact Statement:Cedar Hills Regional Landfill,2010 Site Development Plan. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by HDR Engineering, Inc., Bellevue,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/facilities/cedar-hills-development.asp KCSWD.2010b. Project Program Plan:Cedar Hills Regional Landfill 2010 Site Development Plan.King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/facilities/cedar-hills-development.asp KCSWD.2010c.Vashon Recycling Survey. King County Solid Waste Division,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/documents/2010-Vashon-recycling-survey.pdf KCSWD.2013a.Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan Review. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/plan-review.asp KCSWD.2013b.Optimized Transfer Station Recycling Feasibility Study. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Herrerra,O'Brien and Company,and HDR Engineering, Inc. http://kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/Planning/documents/optimized-TS-feasibility-study. ashx?la=en 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-judy2018 $'3 Att A Page 196 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 KCSWD.2013c. DRAFT Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. http://www.kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/planning/documents/2013-swd-comp-plan. ashx?la=en KCSWD.2014a.Sustainable Solid Waste Management Plan. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/planning/documents-planning.asp#sustain-study KCSWD.2014b. King County UTC Area Multifamily Pilots. Prepared for King County Solid Waste Division by Cascadia Consulting Group. http://kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/Planning/documents/KC-UTC-multifamily-recycling- project-2013-fi na I-report.ashx?la=en KCSWD.2015.Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan Review Part 2. http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/about/plan-review.asp KCSWD.2016a.Waste Export Evaluation,October 2016.Moorehead, Hobson,et al.,page 27. KCSWD.2016b.Multi-Family Recycling Best Practices Report. KCSWD.2016c. Executive Proposed Solid Waste Disposal Fees 2017-2018.June 2016. KCSWD.2017a.Cedar Hills Site Development Alternatives Final Report,Volumes 1 and 2. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by Herrera Environmental Consultants. KCSWD.2017b.Anaerobic Digestion Feasibility Study. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by HDR Engineering, Inc. http://www.kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/planning/documents/anaerobic-digestion- feasibility-study.ashx?la=en KCSWD.2017c.Working Draft Copy of Evaluation of Disposal Technologies.March 28,2017. KCSWD.2017d.Alternative Solid Waste Revenue Structure. Prepared for the King County Solid Waste Division by FCS Group. November 2017. KCSWD.2018a. Peak Democracy/King County Connects Evaluation for the Draft King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan.May 2018. KCSWD.2018b. Executive Proposed Solid Waste Disposal Fees 2019-2020.June 2018. King County.2011.Annual Report of King County's Climate Change, Energy,Green Building,and Environmental Purchasing Programs. King County,Seattle,WA. http://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/climate/documents/2011-King-County-Sustainability-Report.pdf 8-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 197 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 King County.2012.Greenhouse Gas Emissions in King County:An Updated Geographic-Plus Inventory,a Consumption-based Inventory,and an Ongoing Tracking Framework.Prepared for King County by the Stockholm Institute. http://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/dnrp-d irectors-office/climate/2008-emissions-inventory/ghg-inventory- summary.pdf King County.2015a. King County Strategic Plan,2015 Update:Working Together for One King County. King County, Seattle,WA. http://www.ki ngcou nty.gov/depts/executive/performa nce-strategy-budget/performa nce-strategy/Strategic- Planning/2015%20Strategic%20PIan%20Update.aspx King County.2015b.Strategic Climate Action Plan. King County,Seattle,WA. http://www.kingcounty.gov/services/environment/climate/strategies/strategic-climate-action-plan.aspx King County.2016a. King County Comprehensive Plan with 2016 Update. King County,Seattle,WA. http://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/executive/performance-strategy-budget/regional-planning/king-county- comprehensive-plan.aspx King County.2016b. King County Equity and Social Justice Strategic Plan 2016-2022. King County,Seattle,WA. http://www.kingcounty.gov/elected/executive/equity-social-justice/strategic-plan.aspx Michaels,T.,Shiang, I.,2016 Directory of Waste to Energy Facilities, ERC,page 5. Morris,J.2008.Curbside Recycling in King County:Valuation of Environmental Benefits-Revised Draft.Dr.Jeffrey Morris,Sound Resource Management Group,Olympia,WA. Normandeau.2017. King County Waste-to-Energy Study. Prepared for the King County Department of Resources and Parks,Solid Waste Division by Normandeau Associates Inc,CDM Smith,and Neomer. http://www.kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/planning/documents/waste-to-energy-options- considerations.ashx?la=en R.W. Beck.2007.Comparative Evaluation of Waste Export and Conversion Technologies Disposal Options. Prepared for the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks,Solid Waste Division by R.W. Beck, Inc.,Seattle,WA. http://www.kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/dnrp/solid-waste/about/planning/documents/Conversion_ Technologies_Report.ashx?la=en Sound Resource Management.2006. Estimated Market Value for Recyclables Remaining in King County's Disposal Stream.Memorandum from Sound Resource Management Group to the King County Solid Waste Division,January 2006(values updated by Sound Resource Management August 2008). SWANA.2008.The Long-Term Environmental Risks of Subtitle D Landfills.Solid Waste Association of North America Applied Research Foundation, Dallas,TX. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july2018 $'5 Att A Page 198 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 SWANA.2011.Waste Conversion Technologies,Jeremy K.O'Brien, P.E.,Solid Waste Association of North America MSW Management Magazine. Watson,Jay L., Liz Tennant,and Dave Galvin.2010.2010 Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan Update. Local Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County,Seattle,WA. http://www.hazwasteheIp.org/AboutUs/pdf/Chapter4_LegalAuthority_Cover.pdf 8-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 199 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 i jw Ip 3 y I is P Y i` t yJJ Y� i a' p _ "� Att A Page 200 " Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Appendix Utilities and Transportation Commission Cost Assessment Att A Page 201 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission Cost Assessment This plan is prepared for King County and its incorporated cities, excluding Seattle and Milton. Prepared by: King County Solid Waste Division Contact: Meg Moorehead, Strategy, Communications& Performance Manager Date: May 17, 2018 DEFINITIONS Throughout this document: Year 1 refers to 2018 Year 3 refers to 2020 Year 6 refers to 2023 Year refers to calendar year January 1— December 31 1. DEMOGRAPHICS The King County solid waste system comprises 37 of the 39 cities in the county (including all but the cities of Seattle and Milton) and the unincorporated areas of King County. In all,the county's service area covers approximately 2,050 square miles. There are about 1.45 million residents and 840,000 people employed in the service area. 1.1. Population 1.1.1. Population for the entire King County Year 1: 2,166,600 Year 3: 2,257,800 Year 6: 2,297,000 1.1.2. Population for the King County solid waste system Year 1: 1,472,384 Year 3: 1,503,363 Year 6: 1,533,750 1.2. References and Assumptions Projections for population are based on data developed by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC; 2017). Data provided by PSRC are based on U.S. Census and other data sources and developed in close cooperation with the county and the cities. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 A-1 Att A Page 202 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 2. WASTE STREAM GENERATION 2.1. Tonnage Recycled Year 1: 1,032,873 (52% recycling) Year 3: 1,090,977 (52% recycling) Year 6: 1,179,649 (52% recycling) 2.2. Tonnage Disposed Year 1: 953,421 Year 3: 1,007,056 Year 6: 1,088,907 2.3. References and Assumptions The division uses a planning forecast model to predict future waste generation,which is defined as waste disposed+materials recycled. The forecast is used to guide system planning, budgeting, rate setting,and operations. The primary objectives of the model are to: 1)estimate future waste disposal and 2) provide estimates of the amount of materials expected to be diverted from the waste stream through division and city waste prevention and recycling programs. The tonnage forecast is described in more detail in Chapter 3 of the Plan. 3. SYSTEM COMPONENT COSTS This section addresses costs associated with current programs and those recommended in the draft plan. 3.1. Waste Reduction and Recycling Programs Many programs address waste reduction and prevention as well as recycling;therefore,they are presented here together. 3.1.1.Programs • Education and promotion campaigns • EcoConsumer program • Grants to cities to support waste prevention and recycling • Product stewardship support and promotion—"Take it Back Network" • Construction and demolition debris waste prevention and recycling education and promotion • Sustainable building education and promotion • LinkUp program • Organics management program • Master Recycler composter program • School programs • Special recycling collection events • Green Holidays program • Transfer facility recycling A-Z 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 203 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Detail on current programs and proposed waste prevention and recycling programs, primarily building on current efforts, are presented in the recommendations in Chapter 4 of the Plan. 3.1.2. The costs of waste reduction and recycling programs (including transfer station recycling) implemented and proposed are estimated to be: Year 1: $12,150,041 Year 3: $10,447,707 Year 6: $12,730,951 3.1.3. Funding mechanisms: Year 1: Disposal fees $11,871,402 G ra nts 118,639 Unincorporated area recycling fee 160,000 Year 3: Disposal fees $10,167,069 G ra nts 120,639 Unincorporated area recycling fee 160,000 Year 6: Disposal fees $12,468,313 G ra nts 102,639 Unincorporated area recycling fee 160,000 3.2. Recycling Programs—see 3.1, combined with Waste Reduction Programs 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 A-3 Att A Page 204 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 3.3 Solid Waste Collection Programs 3.3.1 UTC Regulated Solid Waste Collection Programs Data for 2017 and estimates for 2018, 2020 and 2023 are shown below: UTC Regulated Hauler Name: Waste Management of Washington,Inc. G-permit#:G-237 720 4th Ave,Ste 400 Kirkland WA 98033 Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 37,974 38,378 39,187 39,979 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 61,060 62,519 66,036 71,403 Commercial #of Customers 1,346 1,360 1,389 1,417 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 26,487 27,119 28,645 30,973 UTC Regulated Hauler Name: American Disposal Company, Inc. G-permit#:G-87 4662 70th Ave E, Puyallup WA 98371 Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 2,074 2,096 2,140 2,183 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 1,486 1,522 1,608 1,738 Commercial #of Customers 215 217 222 226 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 1,411 1,444 1,526 1,650 A-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 205 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 UTC Regulated Hauler Name: Fiorito Enterprises, Inc.&Rabanco Companies G-permit#:G-60 22010 76th Ave 5, Kent WA 98032 Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 25,343 25,613 26,152 26,681 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 36,564 37,438 39,544 42,758 Commercial #of Customers 520 526 537 547 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 13,440 13,761 14,536 15,717 UTC Regulated Hauler Name: Rabanco LTD,1600127th Ave NE Bellevue WA 98005 G-permit#:G-12 1600127th Ave NE,Bellevue WA 98005 Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 7,848 7,932 8,099 8,262 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 13,300 13,618 14,384 15,553 Commercial #of Customers 203 205 209 214 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 9,434 9,660 10,203 11,032 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 A-5 Att A Page 206 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 3.3.2 Other(non-regulated)Solid Waste Collection Programs Data for 2017 and estimates for 2018, 2020,and 2023 are shown below. Hauler Name: Republic Services Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 123,174 124,485 127,108 129,677 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 232,390 237,941 251,327 271,754 Commercial #of Customers 5,400 5,457 5,572 5,685 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 196,424 201,116 212,430 229,696 Hauler Name: Recology Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 63,872 64,552 65,912 67,244 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 118,391 121,219 128,039 138,445 Commercial #of Customers 2,324 2,349 2,398 2,447 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 86,337 88,399 93,372 100,961 Hauler Name: Waste Management of Washington, Inc. Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 84,442 85,341 87,139 88,900 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 168,584 172,611 182,321 197,140 Commercial #of Customers 5,479 5,610 5,925 6,407 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 136,633 139,896 147,766 159,776 A-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 207 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Hauler Name: City of Enumclaw Yr 1 Yr 3 Yr 6 2017 2018 2020 2023 Residential #of Customers 3,621 3,660 3,737 3,812 Tonnage (garbage,YW&recycling) 4,494 4,602 4,861 5,256 Commercial #of Customers 3,621 3,660 3,737 3,812 Tonnage Collected (garbage only) 2,835 2,903 3,067 3,316 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 A'7 Att A Page 208 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 3.4 Energy Recovery&Incineration (ER&I) Programs Not applicable—the Solid Waste Division has no such program. 3.5 Land Disposal Program 3.5.1 Landfill Name: Cedar Hills Regional Landfill Owner: King County Operator: King County Solid Waste Division 3.5.2 The approximate tonnage disposed at the landfill by UTC regulated haulers is expected to be: Year 1: 94,716 Year 3: 100,044 Year 6: 108,176 3.5.3 The approximate tonnage disposed at the landfill by other contributors is expected to be: Year 1: 858,705 Year 3: 907,012 Year 6: 980,731 3.5.4 Landfill operating and capital costs are estimated to be: Year 1: $46,973,382 Year 3: $55,365,039 Year 6: $51,868,163 3.5.5 Landfill funding: Tipping fees 3.6 Administration Program 3.6.1 Budgeted cost and funding sources: Budgeted Cost Funding Source Year 1: $40,785,701 Tipping fees Year 3: $40,827,859 Tipping Fees Year 6: $52,185,563 Tipping fees 3.6.2 Cost components included in these estimates are: All Operating Expenditures except for direct cost components of Transfer Operations, Disposal Operations, and ancillary operating units. 3.6.3 Funding mechanisms Around 90 percent of the division's revenue comes from tipping fees charged at transfer facilities and the Cedar Hills landfill.The remainder comes from a few additional sources, including interest earned on fund balances, a surcharge on construction and demolition (C&D), revenue from the sale of recyclable materials received at division transfer facilities, a fee on recyclables collected in A-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 209 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 unincorporated areas, and grants to help clean up litter and illegal dumping throughout the county and to support WPR. Other than grant funds,all revenue sources support all programs. 3.7 Other Programs 3.7.1 The Transfer Services System Program is described in Chapter 5 of the Plan. It includes the division's recycling and transfer stations, private facilities that handle construction and demolition debris (C&D),and household hazardous waste (HHW) service,which is covered in detail by the Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan. 3.7.2 The division owns and operates eight transfer stations and two drop boxes. Allied Waste and Waste Management own and operate facilities that handle C&D. The division operates HHW service at its Factoria transfer station and provides Wastemobile service via a contractor. 3.7.3 The UTC regulates the C&D facilities. 3.7.4 Solid Waste Division Costs 3.7.4.1 Transfer facility operating and capital costs are estimated to be: Year 1: $61,022,952 Year2: $68,229,939 Year 3: $80,090,023 3.7.4.2 HHW service costs are estimated to be: NA 3.7.5 The major funding source for division transfer operations is tipping fees. Capital costs are paid from the construction fund; bond proceeds and contributions from the operating fund (tipping fees) are deposited into the construction fund. The cost of providing HHW service is funded by the LHWMP. 3.8 References and Assumptions The estimate for year 1 costs is from actual 2018 costs to-date plus projected costs for the remainder of the year;years 3 and 6 were increased to account for inflation,tonnage projections,and expected program additions.The collection program estimates were derived using hauler reports and a projected rate of population increase in King County. Numbers have been rounded in most instances. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 A-9 Att A Page 210 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 4 FUNDING MECHANISMS Table 4.1.1 Facility Inventory Facility Name Type of Facility Tip Fee Estimated Transfer Final Disposal Total Tons Total Revenue per Ton Transfer and Station Location Disposed Generated Transportation Location (Tip Fee x Cost" Tons) King County Transfer Station $134.59 $61,022,952 King County Cedar Hills 922,121 $124,108,265 Transfer Stations Landfill Regional Direct Landfill $114.00 Cedar Hills 9,000 $1,026,000 Cedar Hills Landfill Special Waste Landfill $162.00 Cedar Hills 2,300 $372,600 Cedar Hills Landfill Commercial Haul Landfill $134.59 Cedar Hills 20,000 $2,691,800 Cedar Hills Landfill Yard WasteNVood Transfer Stations $75.00 Cedar Grove 21,000 $1,575,000 King County Composting Total 974,421 $129,773,665 Table 4.1.2 Disposal(Tip) Fee Components Fee per ton Moderate risk waste State tax surcharge Basic Fee 134.59 4.73 5.02 Regional Direct 114.00 Special Waste 162.00 5.83 Yard Waste 75.00 Table 4.1.3 Funding Mechanism(see next tables) Table 4.1.4 Tip Fee Forecast Year One Year Three Tip fee per ton by facility[1) (2018) (2020) Year Six(2023) All Facilities $134.59 $140.82 $154.16 [1] Basic fee A-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2c,-z8 Att A Page 211 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 4.2 Funding Mechanisms Table 4.2.1 Funding Mechanism By Percentage—Year 1 Component Tip Fee% Grant% Bond % Collection Tax Other% Total Rates% Waste Reduction & 99% 1% 100% Recycling Transfer 100% 100% Capital Projects 100% 100% Land Disposal 100% 100% Administration 100% 100% Capital Debt Service 100% 100% Other 100% 100% Table 4.2.2 Funding Mechanism By Percentage—Year 3 Component Tip Fee% Grant% Bond % Collection Tax Other% Total Rates% Waste Reduction & 99% 1/o 100/ 0 Recycling Transfer 100% 100% Capital Projects 100% 100% Land Disposal 100% 100% Administration 100% 100% Capital Debt Service 100% 100% Other 100% 100% 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 A-1 1 Att A Page 212 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 4.2.3 Funding Mechanism By Percentage—Year 6 Component Tip Fee% Grant% Bond% Collection Tax Other% Total Rates% Waste Reduction& 99% 1/°° 100% ° Recycling Transfer 100% 100% Capital Projects 100% 100% Land Disposal 100% 100% Administration 100% 100% Capital Debts Service 100% 100% Other 100% 100% 4.2 References and Assumptions Revenue and operating cost projections for years 1,3,and 6 are shown in Attachment 1. 4.3 Surplus Funds The division develops its solid waste rate to maintain a 30-day emergency reserve in the operating fund. Beginning in 2019,the division will also maintain a minimum reserve balance for economic recessions equivalent to 5%of projected disposal revenue. A-12 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 213 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Attachment 1 2018 2020 2023 Basic Fee 135 141 154 Revenues Disposal Fees 130,251,197 143,923,834 170,697,073 Interest Earnings 849,809 1,030,297 879,336 Grants 118,639 120,639 102,639 Landfill Gas 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 Rental Incomes 612,208 621,338 675,097 C&D 849,543 642,669 648,192 Other Revenue 8,643,986 537,707 584,231 Moderate Risk Waste Reimb Expense 2,141,140 3,612,578 3,925,147 Low-Income Discount - (300,000) (328,411) Total Revenue 146,466,521 153,189,061 179,683,303 Operating Expenditures Moderate Risk Waste 2,141,140 3,612,578 3,925,147 Public Health Transfer 1,058,216 1,097,691 1,253,623 Landfill Reserve Fund 18,739,437 29,688,762 23,130,987 Capital Equipment Recovery Program 6,900,000 6,900,000 6,100,000 Construction Fund 6,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Capital program debt service 13,350,000 23,267,327 27,786,035 Cedar Hills Rent 3,039,274 3,108,000 3,250,000 City mitigation - 39,872 43,322 CHRLF Environmental Liability Policy 572,806 500,000 543,261 Fund Management 10,227,554 12,784,723 17,534,519 SW Directors Office 1,659,920 1,798,199 2,188,021 Human Resources 1,828,997 1,828,382 2,353,656 Legal Support 25,782 38,082 44,817 Customer Transactions 3,691,021 4,056,591 4,774,049 Strategy,Communications&Performance 3,263,234 3,273,757 3,884,536 Enterprise Services 3,769,015 3,720,642 4,410,987 Contract Management 1,034,931 755,109 888,660 Project Management (29,429) 160,346 188,706 Recycling&Environmental Services 12,150,041 10,447,707 12,730,951 Facility Engineering&Science 6,374,588 5,914,155 7,829,226 Envir Monitor&Compliance 481,068 686,847 808,325 Operations Management 922,213 942,807 1,109,554 Transfer Operations 11,978,151 13,224,667 16,425,961 Transportation 10,840,311 9,914,616 11,668,137 Disposal Operations 9,079,756 7,460,202 8,913,334 LF Gas Water Control 5,456,152 4,359,666 5,130,726 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 A-13 Att A Page 214 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Shop Operations 6,669,010 6,482,565 7,705,582 Stores 5,967,386 5,940,957 6,991,688 B&O Tax 1,591,460 2,158,858 2,560,456 Total SWD Costs 148,782,035 166,163,110 186,174,267 under expenditure of 2%in low orgs - 1,740,274 2,030,518 SWD cost minus under expenditure 148,782,035 164,422,836 184,143,749 A-14 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 215 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Appendix Six Year P Capital Im rovement Program Att A Page 216 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 a m a N O N c0 m N N m O n N � N c0 oo c0 I� m M N O m m m n N �p n O n O m n ti tiW cl cl cl cl m m N .--i c0 .--I c0 - N m m m m .--I m CGQa� N N N N al Lll V Q N W o oo m Lai N lfi Oi lfl r-I Oi N m c0 c0 N m O O N N N N N p Z sW O .--I m W W � O o m n N m Q O oo N n W .m-I .N-I a, lN0 �y O N N N N CO m l0 LCia N Ol G o J Lr N O N Om N O N c0 lfl m N m m rl Ol W l0 Q O N N N N V m .--I c0 U N a o, Win o in in o in o in in O N O N O O Llt XW m n m n O m W N lfl lfl l0 lfl lfl l0 I� W c0 N Z Q m m O r-I lfl lfl rl N l0 l0 l0 V lfl rl V, 2 O Co Co .--I Ol Ol Ol m O m N = n N N LrV m m .--I I� V m m N cl O H "'� V V V 01 l0 l0 O 01 V N .--I O V Q O - - .--I .--I .--I - l0 Ol V .--I I� lft N c0 c0 N N c0 cl rl V V l0 W a � a � a o V Q Y o o o o o o o o o o o v °' o v °' o v °' o v °' o v °' o v °' o v °' o v °' o v °' o o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- W O O O O O LL O O O O O LL a o o LL a 3 c LL a 3 c LL a 3 o LL a 3 c a 3 c LL o 3 c LL a 3 c LL a 3 c LL a 3 c ¢ ° o ¢ ° o ¢ ° o ¢ 2 0 ¢ 2 0 ¢ 2 0 ¢ 2 0 ¢ 2 0 ¢ ° o ¢ ° o '- O m > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U N N C C C C J JE E O O ¢ ¢ U 5 U U 75 0 2 H .o .o v v U tL tL d d U U U U N t0 N O L L l0 l0 0 o > p u u E E io io > > c" o c "o v v a toy v 0 o U U cn cn cc cc = = = E = E w w m mo L — O — O 'Z- �p �p O O a s = n- O a -o u u'L a 'L a a - m m m v m v m 12 m 12 m m LL LL LL cn LL cn cn cn v coy LL LL u u u u u o u o u Diu Z) u u V V Ln Ln o o co c0 Ln Ln Ln Ln l0 l0 o o Z O O O O lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl Ol Ol Ol Ol lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m 'p m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 B-1 Att A Page 217 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 N al O V l0 m a � O N O co N 111 a o 0 N N 0 O O . N ,vj � m m o O al O M 0 0 N O V m N V - l0 � 11 CO cl�N W al N - O V O N W m O W I� N m N N O lfl lfl N N N oo W �--i Z W W N V V m O \ 11 N O N 10 N 0 O W co co N o O m rl O O CLL N G J Q lfl O m N lfl l0 N V cn N v co io n N io o O IR m I, m W .--i al V c0 d vi ai v o ai N a iri m io co N N io m co m aN ti n in ti N in m N O NUN N N rl r-I lfl m N Wl0 Co m N lfl N V lfl m V V al lfl - al al V m lft 11 al m Lr Xoo N 0 O O O al N m N m m N O W al lfl V O W m 11 lft lft l0 m O (� N 10 16 o N N Z 0^ - oo - m Io V o N m O m l0 o V co m 52 i cl m W al O m al O O c0 O I� O to c0 al N N al V ' al c0 l0 V O V Il n ' / V O .--i lfl r-I V .--i l0 Q O - W V N n N W lft co N V l0 co N m O V m O co N .-I llt m W U V m (T1 lfl lfl lfl I� l0 V ' °J •� v N � a � a o N v v o v v o v v o v v o v v o v v o v v o v v o v v o v o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- o fl- w LL °0 3 a 3 c a 3 c LL a 3 c a 3 a 3 c a 3 c a 3 c a 3 c c Q o o c Q o o c Q o o c Q o o c Q 2 o c Q 2 o c Q 2 o c Q 2 o c < -2 o c i O to > > O m- > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O m- > > O m- > > U N U m U N U U N U m U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U C C N N O O C C C C T T N N N N O O = = Y LJ LJ t0 2 l0 -2 -2 E v E v E o E o o o z z F u o v o v o o a s w °' = = o o a n ` n `_' u E E a a a a a a a a > > w > '� LJ LJ C C fl_ fl_ C C C i C i LJ a Q Q w E w E w o w o Q Q v — — — -L x x x x x x x x x a x a x x x x x x x E o f o E E co mco o o io io co « co « co « co « co co co " co " co co o io 2 co a s a a a a a s v o v o -o � a a a a n a a a a a N N N T w N T w N w N w N N N N N O N O N U U U to U Vl U Vl U Vl U U Q Q U �C U �C U to U Vl U C N N V V - - - - N N - - l0 l0 V V I� W Z V r V V V V - .--I al al O O O O V V V V V lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl lfl V V al al rl rl rl rl W W W W W m m m m m m N N lfl lfl V V V V al al al al al B-Z 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 218 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 i" = cl 00 a a, N O N a m N I� O m N o N 01 c0 N m v m O N Ol 0 O N ^ p N m v c0 m Lr Lr N Vo N N V O o N � O Q W ti m aN n O N V r N Z W W c0 O .--I I� m QO ONl lm0 l�0 Om N O Ol V lfl lfl l0 CL N G J a cl o o N o com o io o cl a o o o m O N lfl N lfl lfl Ol NU N I.f to l^O O O ON n o lm0 Xoo 01 O N m ti N N lft c0 O .-I c0 01 N V N Z Q m I� O N O 01 m l0 N Ol Ol l0 O �--� / ~ O N c0 V V m .--I n Q N .--I Ol I� m Ol Il l0 is W N � a � CO o Q Y o V o V o V o V o V o V o V o V o � m o n cn o n cn O n cn O n cn O n cn O n cn O n cn O n cn o n cn a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o ¢ 2 o O m > > O m > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U U N U O O UU L L L L Q Q it O O C C o o O O U U d a O O u — — U U o o Q L L d d Ol Ol w w io m io O O y U U l0 l0 U U U U — fl_ i0+ C i0+ C F O v v w w ¢ ¢ z z E o E o E 2 E 2 c o c o F- = = = = = = = o o ° ° °_ u o u E v E u c a a a a a a a a ¢ ¢ w E w E > > 'r- o � o cr a ¢ °J °' w o w o 0 o o o E E o f o f O p o v v o p o m E w E a L a L w a a o a op a c a c a a a a a - a - a c a c > > UJUJ UNUM U U U U UmUm UU UU w � w � > > � c0 .--I .ti N N m m V V V V m m c0 c0 O O Z V N N N N N N N N O O m m m m V V c0 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 V V c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 Ol m m m m m m m m N N l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 l0 'p N m m m m m m m m .--i .ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 B-3 Att A Page 219 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 � � o o 00 ti m a � N O N Ln O O m a a0 N � W 0 Lo Ln m M N a--I 4.f1 N c N n O O W �--i N o u W Q, N N rWo N I- C O m Ln m Ol00 l00 l00 Qt Qt Qi IL N m m m N 0 n O l0 l0 l0 N N � Z � m � W ` 7 m O O O O Q, N Q, W IR l00 O N O N O W O O lo0 o a�-I o a� –I o a�–I L-f, Lmf, QO, W O l0 m l0 Ql l0 Ql l0 N a--I l0 CL N W T co .ti m m J Q O m O N O O N n m O O N O Q, O O O LO N OIli Ln O m N Ln N Ln .ti Ln � Lo O m I� N a N o a N to .ti O co O ti O I� T m N N co m co m Q, m .–I Ln I" .--I U N a--I N Ql to a--I WLn O I" O n O n Q, m Ln l^O O Xoo ri o ti m ti m ti m ri a, N a, O a, co a, co a, o I, N O a--I N o N N Z 0 N a, m 7 T O N a, o / rl Lr l0 0o I, 7 m to ai m 0o m Q N N a--I l0 Ll, a-I m l0 o m O Ll, a, l0 a-I Q, LO o l0 Lr, - N Uto to N N W o O � W W Q W u N Q Q 0 a N m v o v o v o v o v o v o v o v o v N v °' o v v o o fl- o fl- o fl- o L2 L2 L2 L2 fl- o w -°o 3 -°o 3 -°o 3 -°o 3 -°o 3 -°o 3 -°o 3 -°o 3 c a s o c a s o c < -2 o c < -2 o c < -2 o c < -2 o c < -2 o c a o o c O to > > N O to > > N O to > > N O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O O > > U � U U � U U � U N U � U 0 o O o E E E E E E a O +O+ O +O+ +O+ +O+ i i 12 c c cy y c c Ft: F- r F- -° -° o o v>i v>i v>i v>i c c Y Y ~ > > c c c c L c L c T T c c N O O N N O O O O O w O U U 1.1 U U T U >' U 5 U 5 U N N U U N N as _ _ E E o — o — o — o — m o n o v v v n T T p = = c c a a x x 2 ° v c v c v c v c v v U w cE E E E o `" o o o — — o c o c o c o c U U O O U OU O U O U O > > L L L O L O O O O O O O p ,O 4 4 c c '> > > '> ? c c c n n 3 ' 3 o o 0 o > > o c o c o c o c o o o `° o `° E `° E O `° O `° LL x U x U o o a a a a r F- z in z in x x m in m in in C � W W m m l0 l0 Ll, O O 7 7 Ln Ln Ln Ln Q, Q, a, a, O O O O o Z ti ti ao ao ao ao ao ao :T Ln Ln Ln Ln m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ao B-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 220 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 o m °, co IR o m N o N O N N al N c0 N N ' lft m O N m v m N O a N TV m m m .-I c0 I� al ' Il O m m V O m c0 O N m m O to a� N to rl rl o o to to N Lr O V l00 l0 N W lf? m O N to rl .--I .--I O lfl to O O cln n O oo V O N W m aa, N al V LL ei CO m Ol .--i O C N W al O rl .--I al lfl to to Z al W W �--i O V W O n N l0 N m - m O O O I� Ol l0 Ol Lr rl O lft N lft 0 O N N T V .--I O V W al N o I� rl 11 Il m LL N .--i I� Ol ifl J in io m m m o m io io co v ti m a� in in of a m co v o .-i o N ai v o a a 0 NU N .--I .--I ^ co N N W O Vo m O �--i O al O O } al I� V co O lft O lft O N O al O O V O llt N V to O .--I O O V O al O llt rl 11 X oo mN o m m N m O al O N co cto Izr N m c0 to c0 N m .--I N 11 V o O al O O c0 c0 lft N c0 al l0 O 10 al (n N .ti .-i .ti n W O V Z 0 V I� l0 m a, O -zr lft l0 .--I l0 o m V, N lft l0 l0 Ol O V C cl rl cl O N Il m L 1� V l0 ' O m ' V N N al c0 I� W Il al m V / H rl W m al l0 - V V - V m m l0 W Q O O N m O O W .--I N U NN N N l0 a, m � a .--i .--i m co m m � � o a JO a oN oN oN oN oN oN oN oN N 3 a s v a s v a s v a s v a s u a a v a s u a a v a s u v o cn O o cn O o cn O o cn O o cn O o cn O o cn O o cn O o cn `p a vi w a 3 � LL a 3 � LL a 3 � LL a 3 � LL -o0 3 � -o0 3 � -o0 3 � -o0 3 � -°0 3 � w v 3 c o o c ¢ 2 o c ¢ 2 o c ¢ 2 o c ¢ 2 o c ¢ 2 o c ¢ 2 o c ¢ 2 o c ¢ 2 O c Q o Oto > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to > > O to J O 10 N U E U N U E U N U U N U U N U E U N U E U N U U N U U N U U N U 01 c c O L L O O ry o o t t L� L� E E d a Q Q C C E E > > tV0 tV0 H coo x x o m o v v O O L L n n o u u o n .Q u _ a a 'p U O O O O 00 00 U U > > K K N N a o o --SLI E ---m aSLI E u u o o ,`0. ,`0, n n a, a, v LL v r ,��, F- u u co co Lo Lo = io io O 2 i U U i> > �+ d d d t d t u « a O O n a n °on ° °on ° s s c c a a cc cc cc " cc lft l0 l0 lft lft I� n O O I� n W al al I� n o o to o o V V c0 c0 c0 c0 co c0 - - - n m m m a, a, .--i ti co co in in in in v v v v c0 N N lfl lfl V V al al m m m m m m m m o 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 B-5 Att A Page 221 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Appendix Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement Att A Page 222 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 AMENDED AND RESTATED SOLID WASTE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT This Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington and the City of , a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "County" and "City" respectively. Collectively, the County and the City are referred to as the "Parties." This Agreement has been authorized by the legislative body of each jurisdiction pursuant to formal action as designated below: King County: Ordinance No. City: PREAMBLE A. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW for the purpose of extending, restating and amending the Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement between the Parties originally entered into in (the "Original Agreement"). The Original Agreement provided for the cooperative management of Solid Waste in King County for a term of forty (40)years, through June 30, 2028. The Original Agreement is superseded by this Amended and Restated Agreement, as of the effective date of this Agreement. This Amended and Restated Agreement is effective for an additional twelve (12)years through December 31, 2040. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-1 Att A Page 223 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 B. The Parties intend to continue to cooperatively manage Solid Waste and to work collaboratively to maintain and periodically update the existing King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (Comprehensive Plan) adopted pursuant to chapter 70.95 RCW. C. The Parties continue to support the established goals of Waste Prevention and Recycling as incorporated in the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, and to meet or surpass applicable environmental standards with regard to the Solid Waste System. D. The County and the Cities agree that System-related costs, including environmental liabilities, should be funded by System revenues which include but are not limited to insurance proceeds, grants and rates; E. The County, as the service provider, is in the best position to steward funds System revenues that the County and the Cities intend to be available to pay for environmental liabilities; and F. The County and the Cities recognize that at the time this Agreement goes into effect, it is impossible to know what the ultimate environmental liabilities could be; nevertheless, the County and the Cities wish to designate in this Agreement a protocol for the designation and distribution of funding for potential future environmental liabilities in order to protect the general funds of the County and the Cities. G. The County began renting the Cedar Hills Landfill from the State of Washington in 1960 and began using it for Disposal of Solid Waste in 1964. The County acquired ownership of the Cedar Hills Landfill from the State in 1992. The Cedar Hills Landfill remains an asset owned by the County. C-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 224 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 H. The Parties expect that the Cedar Hills Landfill will be at capacity and closed at some date during the term of this Agreement, after which time all Solid Waste under this Agreement will need to be disposed of through alternate means, as determined by the Cities and the County through amendments to the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. The County currently estimates the useful life of the Cedar Hills Landfill will extend through 2025. It is possible that this useful life could be extended, or shortened, by System management decisions or factors beyond the control of the Parties. L The County intends to charge rent for the use of the Cedar Hills Landfill for so long as the System uses this general fund asset and the Parties seek to clarify terms relative to the calculation of the associated rent. J. The County and Cities participating in the System have worked collaboratively for several years to develop a plan for the replacement or upgrading of a series of transfer stations. The Parties acknowledge that these transfer station improvements, as they may be modified from time-to-time, will benefit Cities that are part of the System and the County. The Parties have determined that the extension of the term of the Original Agreement by twelve (12)years as accomplished by this Agreement is appropriate in order to facilitate the long-term financing of transfer station improvements and to mitigate rate impacts of such financing. K. The Parties have further determined that in order to equitably allocate the benefit to all System Users from the transfer station improvements, different customer classes may be established by the County to ensure System Users do not pay a disproportionate share of the cost of these improvements as a result of a decision by a city not to extend the term of the Original Agreement. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 C-3 Att A Page 225 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 L. The Parties have further determined it is appropriate to strengthen and formalize the advisory role of the Cities regarding System operations. The Parties agree as follows: L DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Agreement the following definitions shall apply: "Cedar Hills Landfill" means the landfill owned and operated by the County located in southeast King County. "Cities"refers to all Cities that have signed an Amended and Restated Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement in substantially identical form to this Agreement. "Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan" or"Comprehensive Plan" means the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, as approved and amended from time to time, for the System, as required by chapter 70.95.080 RCW. "County" means King County, a Charter County and political subdivision of the State of Washington. 'Disposal' means the final treatment, utilization,processing, deposition, or incineration of Solid Waste but shall not include Waste Prevention or Recycling as defined herein. C-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 226 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 "Disposal Rates" means the fee charged by the County to System Users to cover all costs of the System consistent with this Agreement, all state, federal and local laws governing solid waste and the Solid Waste Comprehensive Plan. "Divert" means to direct or permit the directing of Solid Waste to Disposal sites other than the Disposal site(s) designated by King County. "Energy/Resource Recovery" means the recovery of energy in a usable form from mass burning or refuse-derived fuel incineration, pyrolysis or any other means of using the heat of combustion of Solid Waste that involves high temperature (above 1,200 degrees F)processing. (chapter 173.350.100 WAC). "Landfill" means a Disposal facility or part of a facility at which Solid Waste is placed in or on land and which is not a land treatment facility. "Metropolitan Solid Waste Advisory Committee" or"MSWAC" means the advisory committee composed of city representatives, established pursuant to Section IX of this Agreement. "Moderate Risk Waste" means waste that is limited to conditionally exempt small quantity generator waste and household hazardous waste as those terms are defined in chapter 173-350 WAC, as amended. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-5 Att A Page 227 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 "Original Agreement" means the Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement first entered into by and between the Parties, which is amended and restated by this Agreement. "Original Agreements"means collectively all such agreements between Cities and the County in substantially the same form as the Original Agreement. "Parties" means collectively the County and the City or Cities. "Recycling" as defined in chapter 70.95.030 RCW, as amended, means transforming or remanufacturing waste materials into usable or marketable materials for use other than landfill Disposal or incineration. "Regional Policy Committee" means the Regional Policy Committee created pursuant to approval of the County voters in 1993, the composition and responsibilities of which are prescribed in King County Charter Section 270 and chapter 1.24 King County Code, as they now exist or hereafter may be amended. "Solid Waste" means all putrescible and nonputrescible solid and semisolid wastes including but not limited to garbage, rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, swill, commercial waste, sewage sludge, demolition and construction wastes, abandoned vehicles or parts thereof, contaminated soils and contaminated dredged materials, discarded commodities and recyclable materials, but shall not include dangerous, hazardous, or extremely hazardous waste as those terms are defined in chapter 173-303 WAC, as amended; and shall further not include those C-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 228 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 wastes excluded from the regulations established in chapter 173-350 WAC, more specifically identified in Section 173-350-020 WAC. "Solid Waste Advisory Committee" or "SWAC" means the inter-disciplinary advisory forum or its successor created by the King County Code pursuant to chapter 70.95.165 RCW. "System" includes King County's Solid Waste facilities used to manage Solid Wastes which includes but is not limited to transfer stations, drop boxes, landfills, recycling systems and facilities, energy and resource recovery facilities and processing facilities as authorized by chapter 36.58.040 RCW and as established pursuant to the approved King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. "System User" or"System Users" means Cities and any person utilizing the County's System for Solid Waste handling, Recycling or Disposal. "Waste Prevention" means reducing the amount or type of waste generated. Waste Prevention shall not include reduction of already-generated waste through energy recovery, incineration, or otherwise. IL PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to foster transparency and cooperation between the Parties and to establish the respective responsibilities of the Parties in a Solid Waste management System, including but not limited to, planning, Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Disposal. . 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-7 Att A Page 229 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 III. DURATION This Agreement shall become effective as of and shall remain in effect through December 31, 2040. IV. APPROVAL This Agreement will be approved and filed in accordance with chapter 39.34 RCW. V. RENEGOTIATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TERM OF AGREEMENT 5.1 The Parties recognize that System Users benefit from long-term Disposal arrangements, both in terms of predictability of System costs and operations, and the likelihood that more cost competitive rates can be achieved with longer-term Disposal contracts as compared to shorter-term contracts. To that end, at least seven(7)years before the date that the County projects that the Cedar Hills Landfill will close, or prior to the end of this Agreement, whichever is sooner, the County will engage with MSWAC and the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, among others, to seek their advice and input on the Disposal alternatives to be used after closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill, associated changes to the System, estimated costs associated with the recommended Disposal alternatives, and amendments to the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan necessary to support these changes. Concurrently, the Parties will meet to negotiate an extension of the term of the Agreement for the purpose of facilitating the long-term Disposal of Solid Waste after closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill. Nothing in this Agreement shall require the Parties to reach agreement on an extension of the term of this Agreement. If the Parties fail to reach agreement on an extension, the Dispute Resolution provisions of Section XIII do not apply, and this Agreement shall remain unchanged. C-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 230 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 5.2 Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the Parties may, pursuant to mutual written agreement, modify or amend any provision of this Agreement at any time during the term of said Agreement. VI. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS OF PARTIES 6.1 King County 6.1.a Management. The County agrees to provide Solid Waste management services, as specified in this Section, for Solid Waste generated and collected within the City, except waste eliminated through Waste Prevention or waste recycling activities. The County agrees to dispose of or designate Disposal sites for all Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste generated and/or collected within the corporate limits of the City which is delivered to the System in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local environmental health laws, rules, or regulations, as those laws are described in Subsection 8.5.a. The County shall maintain records as necessary to fulfill obligations under this Agreement. 6.Lb Planning. The County shall serve as the planning authority for Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste under this Agreement but shall not be responsible for planning for any other waste or have any other planning responsibility under this Agreement. 6.Lc Operation. King County shall be or shall designate or authorize the operating authority for transfer, processing and Disposal facilities, including public landfills and other facilities, consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan as well as closure and post- closure responsibilities for landfills which are or were operated by the County. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-9 Att A Page 231 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 6.1.d Collection Service. The County shall not provide Solid Waste collection services within the corporate limits of the City, unless permitted by law and agreed to by both Parties. 6.Le Support and Assistance. The County shall provide support and technical assistance to the City consistent with the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan for a Waste Prevention and Recycling program. Such support may include the award of grants to support programs with System benefits. The County shall develop educational materials related to Waste Prevention and Recycling and strategies for maximizing the usefulness of the educational materials and will make these available to the City for its use. Although the County will not be required to provide a particular level of support or fund any City activities related to Waste Prevention and Recycling, the County intends to move forward aggressively to promote Waste Prevention and Recycling. 6.1.f Forecast. The County shall develop Solid Waste stream forecasts in connection with System operations as part of the comprehensive planning process in accordance with Article XI. 6.1.g Facilities and Services. The County shall provide facilities and services pursuant to the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan and the Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management plan as adopted and County Solid Waste stream forecasts. 6.1.h Financial Policies. The County will maintain financial policies to guide the System's operations and investments. The policies shall be consistent with this Agreement and shall address debt issuance, rate stabilization, cost containment, reserves, asset ownership and use, and other financial issues. The County shall primarily use long term bonds to finance transfer System improvements. The policies shall be developed and/or revised through C-1 U 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 232 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 discussion with MSWAC, the Regional Policy Committee, the County Executive and the County Council. Such policies shall be codified at the same time as the Comprehensive Plan updates, but may be adopted from time to time as appropriate outside the Comprehensive Plan process. 6.2 City 6.2.a Collection. The City, an entity designated by the City or such other entity as is authorized by state law shall serve as operating authority for Solid Waste collection services provided within the City's corporate limits. 6.2.b Disposal. The City shall cause to be delivered to the County's System for Disposal all such Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste which is authorized to be delivered to the System in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local environmental health laws, rules or regulations and is generated and/or collected within the corporate limits of the City and shall authorize the County to designate Disposal sites for the Disposal of all such Solid Waste and Moderate Risk Waste generated or collected within the corporate limits of the City, except for Solid Waste which is eliminated through Waste Prevention or waste Recycling activities consistent with the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. No Solid Waste generated or collected within the City may be Diverted from the designated Disposal sites without County approval. 6.3 JOINT RESPONSIBILITIES. 6.3.a Consistent with the Parties' overall commitment to ongoing communication and coordination, the Parties will endeavor to notify and coordinate with each other on the development of any City or County plan, facility, contract, dispute, or other Solid Waste issue that could have potential significant impacts on the County, the System, or the City or Cities. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2o-z8 C.- Att A Page 233 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 6.3.b The Parties, together with other Cities, will coordinate on the development of emergency plans related to Solid Waste, including but not limited to debris management. VII. COUNTY SHALL SET DISPOSAL RATES AND OPERATING RULES FOR DISPOSAL; USE OF SYSTEM REVENUES 7.1 In establishing Disposal Rates for System Users, the County shall consult with MSWAC consistent with Section IX. The County may adopt and amend by ordinance rates necessary to recover all costs of the System including but not limited to operations and maintenance, costs for handling, processing and Disposal of Solid Waste, siting, design and construction of facility upgrades or new facilities, Recycling, education and mitigation, planning, Waste Prevention, reserve funds, financing, defense and payment of claims, insurance, System liabilities including environmental releases, monitoring and closure of landfills which are or were operated by the County, property acquisition, grants to cities, and administrative functions necessary to support the System and Solid Waste handling services during emergencies as established by local, state and federal agencies or for any other lawful solid waste purpose, and in accordance with chapter 43.09.2 10 RCW. Revenues from Disposal rates shall be used only for such purposes. The County shall establish classes of customers for Solid Waste management services and by ordinance shall establish rates for classes of customers. 7.2. It is understood and agreed that System costs include payments to the County general fund for Disposal of Solid Waste at the Cedar Hills Landfill calculated in accordance with this Section 7.2, and that such rental payments shall be established based on use valuations provided to the County by an independent-third party Member, Appraisal Institute (MAI) certified appraiser selected by the County in consultation with MSWAC. C-1 2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 234 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 7.2.a A use valuation shall be prepared consistent with MAI accepted principles for the purpose of quantifying the value to the System of the use of Cedar Hills Landfill for Disposal of Solid Waste over a specified period of time (the valuation period). The County shall establish a schedule of annual use charges for the System's use of the Cedar Hills Landfill which shall not exceed the most recent use valuation. Prior to establishing the schedule of annual use charges, the County shall seek review and comment as to both the use valuation and the proposed payment schedule from MSWAC. Upon request, the County will share with and explain to MSWAC the information the appraiser requests for purposes of developing the appraiser's recommendation. 7.2.b Use valuations and the underlying schedule of use charges shall be updated if there are significant changes in Cedar Hills Landfill capacity as a result of opening new Disposal areas and as determined by revisions to the existing Cedar Hills Regional Landfill Site Development Plan; in that event, an updated appraisal will be performed in compliance with MAI accepted principles. Otherwise, a reappraisal will not occur. Assuming a revision in the schedule of use charges occurs based on a revised appraisal, the resulting use charges shall be applied beginning in the subsequent rate period. 7.2.c The County general fund shall not charge use fees or receive other consideration from the System for the System's use of any transfer station property in use as of the effective date of this Agreement. The County further agrees that the County general fund may not receive payments from the System for use of assets to the extent those assets are acquired with System revenues. As required by chapter 43.09.2 10 RCW, the System's use of assets acquired with the use of other separate County funds (e.g., the Roads Fund, or other funds) 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-13 Att A Page 235 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 will be subject to use charges; similarly, the System will charge other County funds for use of System property. VIII. LIABILITY 8.1 Non-Environmental Liability Arising Out-of-County Operations. Except as provided in this Section, Sections 8.5 and 8.6, the County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and shall have the right and duty to defend the City through the County's attorneys against any and all claims arising out of the County's operations during the term of this Agreement and settle such claims, provided that all fees, costs, and expenses incurred by the County thereby are System costs which may be satisfied from Disposal Rates as provided in Section VII herein. In providing such defense of the City, the County shall exercise good faith in such defense or settlement so as to protect the City's interest. For purposes of this Section "claims arising out of the County's operations" shall mean claims arising out of the ownership, control, or maintenance of the System, but shall not include claims arising out of the City's operation of motor vehicles in connection with the System or other activities under the control of the City which may be incidental to the County's operation. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to claims arising out of the sole negligence or intentional acts of the City. The provisions of this Section shall survive for claims brought within three(3) years past the term of this Agreement established under Section III. 8.2 Cooperation. In the event the County acts to defend the City against a claim under Section 8.1, the City shall cooperate with the County. 8.3 Officers, Agents, and Employees. For purposes of this Section VIII, references to City or County shall be deemed to include the officers, employees and agents of either Party, C-14 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 236 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 acting within the scope of their authority. Transporters or generators of waste who are not officers or employees of the City or County are not included as agents of the City or County for purposes of this Section. 8.4 Each Party by mutual negotiation hereby waives, with respect to the other Party only, any immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. 8.5 Unacceptable Waste 8.5.a All waste generated or collected from within the corporate limits of the City which is delivered to the System for Disposal shall be in compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.) (RCRA), chapters 70.95 and 70.105 RCW, King County Code Title 10, King County Board of Health Rules and Regulations, the Solid Waste Division operating rules, and all other Federal, State and local environmental health laws, rules or regulations that impose restrictions or requirements on the type of waste that may be delivered to the System, as they now exist or are hereafter adopted or amended. 8.5.b For purposes of this Agreement, the City shall be deemed to have complied with the requirements of Subsection 8.5.a if it has adopted an ordinance requiring waste delivered to the System for Disposal to meet the laws, rules, or regulations specified in Subsection 8.5.a. However, nothing in this Agreement is intended to relieve the City from any obligation or liability it may have under the laws mentioned in Subsection 8.5.a arising out of the City's actions other than adopting, enforcing, or requiring compliance with said ordinance, such as liability, if any exists, of the City as a transporter or generator for improper transport or Disposal of regulated dangerous waste. Any environmental liability the City may have for 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-15 Att A Page 237 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 releases of pollutants or hazardous or dangerous substances or wastes to the environment is dealt with under Sections 8.6 and 8.7. 8.5.c The City shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the County for any property damages or personal injury caused solely by the City's failure to adopt an ordinance under Subsection 8.5.b. In the event the City acts to defend the County under this Subsection, the County shall cooperate with the City. 8.5.d The City shall make best efforts to include language in its contracts, franchise agreements, or licenses for the collection of Solid Waste within the City that allow for enforcement by the City against the collection contractor, franchisee or licensee for violations of the laws, rules, or regulations in Subsection 8.5.a. The requirements of this Subsection 8.5.d shall apply to the City's first collection contract, franchise, or license that becomes effective or is amended after the effective date of this Agreement. 8.5.d.i If waste is delivered to the System in violation of the laws, rules, or regulations in Subsection 8.5.a, before requiring the City to take any action under Subsection 8.5.d.ii, the County will make reasonable efforts to determine the parties' responsible for the violation and will work with those parties to correct the violation, consistent with applicable waste clearance and acceptance rules,permit obligations, and any other legal requirements. 8.5.d.ii If the violation is not corrected under Subsection 8.5.d.i and waste is determined by the County to have been generated or collected from within the corporate limits of the City, the County shall provide the City with written notice of the violation. Upon such notice, the City shall take immediate steps to remedy the violation and prevent similar future violations to the reasonable satisfaction of the County which may include but not be C-16 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 238 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 limited to removing the waste and disposing of it in an approved facility; provided that nothing in this Subsection 8.5.d.ii shall obligate the City to handle regulated dangerous waste, as defined in WAC 173-351-200(1)(b)(i), and nothing in this Subsection shall relieve the City of any obligation it may have apart from this Agreement to handle regulated dangerous waste. If, in good faith, the City disagrees with the County regarding the violation, such dispute shall be resolved between the Parties using the Dispute Resolution process in Section XII or, if immediate action is required to avoid an imminent threat to public health, safety or the environment, in King County Superior Court. Each Party shall be responsible for its own attorneys' fees and costs. Failure of the City to take the steps requested by the County pending Superior Court resolution shall not be deemed a violation of this Agreement; provided, however, that this shall not release the City for damages or loss to the County arising out of the failure to take such steps if the Court finds a City violation of the requirements to comply with applicable laws set forth in Subsection 8.5.a. 8.6 Environmental Liability. 8.6.a Neither the County nor the City holds harmless or indemnifies the other with regard to any liability arising under 42 U.S.C. § 9601-9675 (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) or as hereafter amended or pursuant to chapter 70.105D RCW(MTCA) or as hereafter amended and any state legislation imposing liability for System-related cleanup of contaminated property from the release of pollutants or hazardous or dangerous substances and/or damages resulting from property contaminated from the release of pollutants or hazardous or dangerous substances ("Environmental Liabilities"). 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-1 7 Att A Page 239 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 8.6.b Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create new Environmental Liability nor release any third-party from Environmental Liability. Rather, the intent is to protect the general funds of the Parties to this Agreement by ensuring that, consistent with best business practices, an adequate portion of Disposal Rates being collected from the System Users are set aside and accessible in a fair and equitable manner to pay the respective County and City's Environmental Liabilities. 8.6.c The purpose of this Subsection is to establish a protocol for the setting aside, and subsequent distribution of, Disposal Rates intended to pay for Environmental Liabilities of the Parties, if and when such liabilities should arise, in order to safeguard the Parties' general funds. To do so, the County shall: 8.6.c.i Use Disposal Rates to obtain and maintain, to the extent commercially available under reasonable terms, insurance coverage for System-related Environmental Liability that names the City as an Additional Insured. The County shall establish the adequacy, amount and availability of such insurance in consultation with MSWAC. Any insurance policy in effect on the termination date of this Agreement with a term that extends past the termination date shall be maintained until the end of the policy term. 8.6.c.ii Use Disposal Rates to establish and maintain a reserve fund to help pay the Parties' Environmental Liabilities not already covered by System rates or insurance maintained under Subsection 8.6.c.i above ("Environmental Reserve Fund"). The County shall establish the adequacy of the Environmental Reserve Fund in consultation with MSWAC and consistent with the financial policies described in Article VI. The County shall retain the Environmental Reserve Fund for a minimum of 30 years following the closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill (the "Retention Period"). During the Retention Period, the Environmental Reserve Fund C-1 8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 240 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 shall be used solely for the purposes for which it was established under this Agreement. Unless otherwise required by law, at the end of the Retention Period, the County and Cities shall agree as to the disbursement of any amounts remaining in the Environmental Reserve Fund. If unable to agree, the County and City agree to submit disbursement to mediation and if unsuccessful to binding arbitration in a manner similar to Section 39.34.180 RCW to the extent permitted by law. 8.6.c.iii Pursue state or federal grant funds, such as grants from the Local Model Toxics Control Account under chapter 70.105D.070(3) RCW and chapter 173-322 WAC, or other state or federal funds as may be available and appropriate to pay for or remediate such Environmental Liabilities. 8.6.d If the funds available under Subsections 8.6.c.i-iii are not adequate to completely satisfy the Environmental Liabilities of the Parties to this Agreement then to the extent feasible and permitted by law, the County will establish a financial plan including a rate schedule to help pay for the County and City's remaining Environmental Liabilities in consultation with MSWAC. 8.6.e The County and the City shall act reasonably and quickly to utilize funds collected or set aside through the means specified in Subsections 8.6.c.i-iii and 8.6.d to conduct or finance response or clean-up activities in order to limit the County and City's exposure, or in order to comply with a consent decree, administrative or other legal order. The County shall notify the City within 30 days of any use of the reserve fund established in 8.6.c.iii. 8.6.f In any federal or state regulatory proceeding, and in any action for contribution, money expended by the County from the funds established in Subsections 8.6.c.i-iii and 8.6.d. to pay the costs of remedial investigation, cleanup, response or other action required 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-19 Att A Page 241 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 pursuant to a state or federal laws or regulations shall be considered by the Parties to have been expended on behalf and for the benefit of the County and the Cities. 8.6.g In the event that the funds established as specified in Subsections 8.6.c.i-iii and 8.6.d are insufficient to cover the entirety of the County and Cities' collective Environmental Liabilities, the funds described therein shall be equitably allocated between the County and Cities to satisfy their Environmental Liabilities. Factors to be considered in determining "equitably allocated" may include the size of each Party's System User base and the amount of rates paid by that System User base into the funds, and the amount of the Solid Waste generated by the Parties' respective System Users. Neither the County nor the Cities shall receive a benefit exceeding their Environmental Liabilities. 8.7 The County shall not charge or seek to recover from the City any costs or expenses for which the County indemnified the State of Washington in Exhibit A to the Quitclaim Deed from the State to the County for the Cedar Hills Landfill, dated February 24, 1993, to the extent such costs are not included in System costs. IX. CITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 9.1 There is hereby created an advisory committee comprised of representatives from cities, which shall be known as the Metropolitan Solid Waste Advisory Committee ("MSWAC"). The City may designate a representative and alternate(s) to serve on MSWAC. MSWAC shall elect a chair and vice-chair and shall adopt bylaws to guide its deliberations. The members of MSWAC shall serve at the pleasure of their appointing bodies and shall receive no compensation from the County. - 21 - C-20 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 242 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 9.2 MSWAC is the forum through which the Parties together with other cities participating in the System intend to discuss and seek to resolve System issues and concerns. MSWAC shall assume the following advisory responsibilities: 9.2.a Advise the King County Council, the King County Executive, Solid Waste Advisory Committee, and other jurisdictions as appropriate, on all policy aspects of Solid Waste management and planning; 9.2.b Consult with and advise the County on technical issues related to Solid Waste management and planning; 9.2.c Assist in the development of alternatives and recommendations for the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan and other plans governing the future of the System, and facilitate a review and/or approval of the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan by each jurisdiction; 9.2.d Assist in the development of proposed interlocal Agreements between King County and cities for planning, Waste Prevention and Recycling, and waste stream control; 9.2.e Review and comment on Disposal Rate proposals and County financial policies; 9.2.f Review and comment on status reports on Waste Prevention, Recycling, energy/resources recovery, and System operations with inter jurisdictional impact; 9.2.g Promote information exchange and interaction between waste generators, cities, recyclers, and the County with respect to its planned and operated Disposal Systems; 9.2.h Provide coordination opportunities among the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, the Regional Policy Committee, the County, cities, private waste haulers, and recyclers; 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-21 Att A Page 243 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 9.2.i Assist cities in recognizing municipal Solid Waste responsibilities, including collection and Recycling, and effectively carrying out those responsibilities; and 9.2.j Provide input on such disputes as MSWAC deems appropriate. 9.3 The County shall assume the following responsibilities with respect to MSWAC; 9.3.a The County shall provide staff support to MSWAC; 9.3.b In consultation with the chair of MSWAC, the County shall notify all cities and their designated MSWAC representatives and alternates of the MSWAC meeting times, locations and meeting agendas. Notification by electronic mail or regular mail shall meet the requirements of this Subsection; 9.3.c The County will consider and respond on a timely basis to questions and issues posed by MSWAC regarding the System, and will seek to resolve those issues in collaboration with the Cities. Such issues shall include but are not limited to development of efficient and accountable billing practices; and 9.3.d. The County shall provide all information and supporting documentation and analyses as reasonably requested by MSWAC for MSWAC to perform the duties and functions described in Section 9.2. X. FORUM INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT 10.1 As of the effective date of this Agreement, the Forum Interlocal Agreement and Addendum to Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement and Forum Interlocal Agreement by and between the City and County continue through June 30, 2028. After 2028 responsibilities assigned to the Forum shall be assigned to the Regional Policy Committee. The Parties agree that Solid Waste System policies and plans shall continue to be deemed regional countywide policies C-22 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 244 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 and plans that shall be referred to the Regional Policy Committee for review consistent with King County Charter Section 270.30 and chapter 1.24 King County Code. XL COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN 11.1 King County is designated to prepare the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (Comprehensive Plan) and this plan shall include the City's Solid Waste Management Comprehensive Plan pursuant to chapter 70.95.080(3) RCW. 11.2 The Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed and any necessary revisions proposed. The County shall consult with MSWAC to determine when revisions are necessary. King County shall provide services and build facilities in accordance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. 11.3 The Comprehensive Plans will promote Waste Prevention and Recycling in accordance with Washington State Solid Waste management priorities pursuant to chapter 70.95 RCW, at a minimum. 11.4 The Comprehensive Plans will be prepared in accordance with chapter 70.95 RCW and Solid Waste planning guidelines developed by the Department of Ecology. The plan shall include, but not be limited to: 11.4.a Descriptions of and policies regarding management practices and facilities required for handling all waste types; I l Ab Schedules and responsibilities for implementing policies; 11.4.c Policies concerning waste reduction, Recycling, Energy and Resource Recovery, collection, transfer, long-haul transport, Disposal, enforcement and administration; and 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 C-23 Att A Page 245 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 11.4.d Operational plan for the elements discussed in Item c above. 11.5 The cost of preparation by King County of the Comprehensive Plan will be considered a cost of the System and financed out of the rate base. 11.6 The Comprehensive Plans will be "adopted"within the meaning of this Agreement when the following has occurred: 11.6.a The Comprehensive Plan is approved by the King County Council; and 11.6.b The Comprehensive Plan is approved by cities representing three-quarters of the population of the incorporated population of jurisdictions that are parties to the Forum Interlocal Agreement. In calculating the three-quarters, the calculations shall consider only those incorporated jurisdictions taking formal action to approve or disapprove the Comprehensive Plan within 120 days of receipt of the Plan. The 120-day time period shall begin to run from receipt by an incorporated jurisdiction of the Forum's recommendation on the Comprehensive Plan, or, if the Forum is unable to make a recommendation, upon receipt of the Comprehensive Plan from the Forum without recommendation. 11.7 Should the Comprehensive Plan be approved by the King County Council, but not receive approval of three-quarters of the cities acting on the Comprehensive Plan, and should King County and the cities be unable to resolve their disagreement, then the Comprehensive Plan shall be referred to the State Department of Ecology and the State Department of Ecology will resolve any disputes regarding Comprehensive Plan adoption and adequacy by approving or disapproving the Comprehensive Plan or any part thereof. 11.8 King County shall determine which cities are affected by any proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. If any City disagrees with such determination, then the City can request that the Forum determine whether or not the City is affected. Such C-24 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 246 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 determination shall be made by a two-thirds majority vote of all representative members of the Forum. 11.9 Should King County and the affected jurisdictions be unable to agree on amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, then the proposed amendments shall be referred to the Department of Ecology to resolve any disputes regarding such amendments. 11.10 Should there be any impasse between the Parties regarding Comprehensive Plan adoption, adequacy, or consistency or inconsistency or whether any permits or programs adopted or proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, then the Department of Ecology shall resolve said disputes. XII. MITIGATION 12.1 The County will design, construct and operate Solid Waste facilities in a manner to mitigate their impact on host Cities and neighboring communities pursuant to applicable law and regulations. 12.2 The Parties recognize that Solid Waste facilities are regional facilities. The County further recognizes that host Cities and neighboring communities may sustain impacts which can include but are not limited to local infrastructure, odor, traffic into and out of Solid Waste facilities, noise and litter. 12.3 Collaboration in Environmental Review. In the event the County is the sole or co- Lead Agency, then prior to making a threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), the County will provide a copy of the SEPA environmental checklist, if any, and proposed SEPA threshold determination to any identifiable Host City(as defined below) and adjacent or neighboring city that is signatory to the Agreement and that may be affected by the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 C-25 Att A Page 247 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 project("Neighboring City") and seek their input. For any facility for which the County prepares an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS), the County will meet with any identified potential Host City (as defined below) and any Neighboring City to seek input on the scope of the EIS and appropriate methodologies and assumptions in preparing the analyses supporting the EIS. However, nothing in this Section shall limit or impair the County's ability to timely complete the environmental review process. 12.4 Collaboration in Project Permitting. If a new or reconstructed Solid Waste facility is proposed to be built within the boundaries of the City("Host City") and the project requires one or more "project permits" as defined in chapter 36.70B.020(4) RCW from the Host City, before submitting its first application for any of the project permits, the County will meet with the Host City and any Neighboring City, to seek input. However, nothing in this Section shall limit or impair the County's ability to timely submit applications for or receive permits, nor waive any permit processing or appeal timelines. 12.5 Separately, the County and the City recognize that in accordance with 36.58.080 RCW, a city is authorized to charge the County to mitigate impacts directly attributable to a County-owned Solid Waste facility. The County acknowledges that such direct costs include wear and tear on infrastructure including roads. To the extent that the City establishes that such charges are reasonably necessary to mitigate such impacts, payments to cover such impacts may only be expended only to mitigate such impacts and are System costs. If the City believes that it is entitled to mitigation under this Agreement, the City may request that the County undertake a technical analysis regarding the extent of impacts authorized for mitigation. Upon receiving_such a request, the County, in coordination with the City and any necessary technical consultants, will develop any analysis that is reasonable and appropriate to identify impacts. The cost for such C-26 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 248 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 analysis is a System cost. The City and County will work cooperatively to determine the appropriate mitigation payments and will document any agreement in a Memorandum of Agreement. If the City and the County cannot agree on mitigation payments, the dispute resolution process under chapter 36.58.080 RCW will apply rather than the dispute resolution process under Section XII of the Agreement. XIII. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 13.1 Unless otherwise expressly stated, the terms of this Section XIII shall apply to disputes arising under this Agreement. 13.2 Initial Meeting. 13.2.a Either Parry shall give notice to the other in writing of a dispute involving this Agreement. 13.2.b Within ten (10)business days of receiving or issuing such notice, the County shall send an email notice to all Cities. 13.2.c Within ten (10)business days of receiving the County's notice under Subsection 13.2.b, a City shall notify the County in writing or email if it wishes to participate in the Dispute Resolution process. 13.2.d Within not less than twenty-one (21) days nor more than thirty(30) days of the date of the initial notice of dispute issued under Subsection 13.2.a, the County shall schedule a time for staff from the County and any City requesting to participate in the dispute resolution process ("Participating City")to meet(the "initial meeting"). The County shall endeavor to set such initial meeting a time and place convenient to all Participating Cities and to the County. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 C-27 Att A Page 249 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 13.3 Executives' Meeting. 13.3.a If the dispute is not resolved within sixty (60) days of the initial meeting, then within seven(7) days of expiration of the sixty(60)-day period, the County shall send an email notice to all Participating Cities that the dispute was not resolved and that a meeting of the County Executive, or his/her designee and the chief executive officer(s) of each Participating City, or the designees of each Participating City (an"executives' meeting") shall be scheduled to attempt to resolve the dispute. It is provided, however, that the County and the Participating Cities may mutually agree to extend the sixty(60)-day period for an additional fifteen(15) days if they believe further progress may be made in resolving the dispute, in which case, the County's obligation to send its email notice to the Participating Cities under this Subsection that the dispute was not resolved shall be within seven(7) days of the end of the extension. Likewise, the County and the Participating Cities may mutually conclude prior to the expiration of the sixty (60)-day period that further progress is not likely in resolving the dispute at this level, in which case, the County shall send its email notice that the dispute was not resolved within seven (7) days of the date that the County and the Participating Cities mutually concluded that further progress is not likely in resolving the dispute. 13.3.b Within seven (7) days of receiving the County's notice under Subsection 13.3.a each Participating City shall notify the County in writing or email if it wishes to participate in the executives' meeting. 13.3.c Within not less than twenty-one (21) days nor more than thirty(30) days of the date of the notice of the executives' meeting issued under Subsection 13.3.a, the County shall schedule a time for the executives' meeting. The County shall endeavor to set such C-28 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 250 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 executives' meeting a time and place convenient to all Participating Cities that provided notice under Subsection 13.3.b and to the County. 13.4. Non-Binding Mediation. 13.4.a If the dispute is not resolved within thirty (30) days of the executives' meeting, then any Participating City that was Party to the executives' meeting or the County may refer the matter to non-binding meditation by sending written notice within thirty-five (35) days of the initial executives' meeting to all Parties to such meeting. 13.4.b Within seven (7) days of receiving or issuing notice that a matter will be referred to non-binding mediation, the County shall send an email notice to all Participating Cities that provided notice under Subsection 13.3.b informing them of the referral. 13.4.c Within seven (7) days of receiving the County's notice under Subsection 13.4.b, each Participating City shall notify the County in writing if it wishes to participate in the non-binding mediation. 13.4.d The mediator will be selected in the following manner: The City(ies) electing to participate in the mediation shall propose a mediator and the County shall propose a mediator; in the event the mediators are not the same person, the two mediators shall select a third mediator who shall mediate the dispute. Alternately, the City(ies)participating in the mediation and the County may agree to select a mediator through a mediation service mutually acceptable to the Parties. The Parties to the mediation shall share equally in the costs charged by the mediator or mediation service. For purposes of allocating costs of the mediator or mediation service, all Cities participating in the mediation will be considered one Party. 13.5 Superior Court. Any Party, after participating in the non-binding mediation, may commence an action in King County Superior Court after one hundred eighty (180) days from 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 C-29 Att A Page 251 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 the commencement of the mediation, in order to resolve an issue that has not by then been resolved through non-binding mediation, unless all Parties to the mediation agree to an earlier date for ending the mediation. 13.6 Unless this Section XIII does not apply to a dispute, then the Parties agree that they may not seek relief under this Agreement in a court of law or equity unless and until each of the procedural steps set forth in this Section XIII have been exhausted, provided, that if any applicable statute of limitations will or may run during the time that may be required to exhaust the procedural steps in this Section XIII, a Parry may file suit to preserve a cause of action while the Dispute Resolution process continues. The Parties agree that, if necessary and if allowed by the court, they will seek a stay of any such suit while the Dispute Resolution process is completed. If the dispute is resolved through the Dispute Resolution process, the Parties agree to dismiss the lawsuit, including all claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims, with prejudice and without costs to any Party. XIV. FORCE MAJEURE The Parties are not liable for failure to perform pursuant to the terms of this Agreement when failure to perform was due to an unforeseeable event beyond the control of either Party ("force majeure"). The term"force majeure" shall include, without limitation by the following enumeration: acts of nature, acts of civil or military authorities, terrorism, fire, accidents, shutdowns for purpose of emergency repairs, industrial, civil or public disturbances, or labor disputes, causing the inability to perform the requirements of this Agreement, if either Party is rendered unable, wholly or in part, by a force majeure event to perform or comply with any obligation or condition of this Agreement, upon giving notice and reasonably full particulars to C-30 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 252 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 the other Parry, such obligation or condition shall be suspended only for the time and to the extent practicable to restore normal operations. XV. MERGER This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representation and/or agreements between the Parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and constitutes the entire contract between the Parties [except with regard to the provisions of the Forum Interlocal Agreement]; provided that nothing in Section XV supersedes or amends any indemnification obligation that may be in effect pursuant to a contract between the Parties other than the Original Agreement; and further provided that nothing in this Agreement supersedes, amends or modifies in any way any permit or approval applicable to the System or the County's operation of the System within the jurisdiction of the City. XVI. WAIVER No waiver by either Party of any term or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to constitute a waiver of any other term or condition or of any subsequent breach whether of the same or a different provision of this Agreement. XVII. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY This Agreement is not entered into with the intent that it shall benefit any other entity or person except those expressly described herein, and no other such person or entity shall be entitled to be treated as a third-party beneficiary of this Agreement. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 C-31 Att A Page 253 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 XVIII. SURVIVABILITY Except as provided in Section 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, Section 8.6.c, except 8.6.ciii and Section 8.6d, no obligations in this Agreement survive past the expiration date as established in Section III. C-32 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 254 ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 XIX. NOTICE Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, a notice required to be provided under the terms of this Agreement shall be delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested or by personal service to the following person: For the City: For the County: Director King County Solid Waste Division 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 701 Seattle, Washington 98104 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by each Party on the date set forth below: CITY of KING COUNTY (Mayor/City Manager) King County Executive Date Date Clerk-Attest Clerk-Attest Approved as to form and legality Approved as to form and legality City Attorney King County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Date Date 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2oz8 C-33 Att A Page 255 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Appendix Waste Reduction Model (WARM) Inputs Used in Analysis Att A Page 256 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 1: Waste Reduction Model (WARM) inputs used in Chapter 6,Table 6-1 WARM Model Input Cedar Waste Mass Notes Hills Export Burn' - 134,000 -78,000 + 12,000— MTCO2e 12,000— MTCO2e MTCO2e 80,000 MTCO2e Materials 2015 WC 2015 WC 2015 WC 2015 Waste Characterization was adjusted to match a (2015 Waste 52%recycling rate before waste was assigned to Characterization WARM categories.The WARM model assumes [2015 WCj) negative emissions(an offset)due to sequestration of organic materials.About 29%3 of landfilled materials are organics with negative emissions. Region Pacific Pacific Pacific Compared to elsewhere in the U.S.,the energy (regional/state or (WA) (WA) (WA) displaced in the Pacific NW is largely hydropower national average) instead of fossil fuels. Source Reduction/ none none metals This field calculates offsets from recycling. No added Recycling (current (current (current recycling was assumed from landfill options.Added (displace current mix mix) mix) mix) metal recycling(equal to 2%on regional recycling rate) or 100%virgin) was assumed for Mass Burn. Landfill gas recovery recovery recovery recovery For mass burn,gas recovery was assumed for (no, recovery, landfilled bypass waste. national average) Gas Recovery(flare, recover recover recover For mass burn,gas recovery for energy was assumed recover for energy) for energy for energy for energy for the bypass waste that is landfilled. Collection efficiency CA aggressive typical Cedar Hills most closely matches the efficiency (typical,worst, assumptions in the California regulatory collection aggressive,CA) scenario. Moisture wet arid national Decay rates and fugitive emissions are higher in wet (national average, average climates than in other categories. dry, moderate,wet) Anaerobic digestion wet wet wet A choice must be made in the model, but because AD (AD) (wet or dry) is not part of the proposal, it doesn't affect outcome. AD digestate cured cured cured See above.Cured is the default. (cured, not cured) Transport emissions default 320 mi default A landfill choice has not been made but waste export (default<20 mi, shows the closest out of county landfill. actual>20 mi) lA 2017 Normandeau Waste to Energy study was the source of these WARM estimates, but the study did not show model inputs.While Normandeau's WARM inputs are not available, results ranged from 12,000 to 80,000 MTCO2e per year.Their range is likely explained by a different waste composition assumption,exclusion of bypass waste disposal,and much longer time periods(and thus larger plants burning more materials)than in this division comparison,which used 2029 as the base year.The model inputs in the Mass Burn column are the division's assumptions of Normandeau's model inputs. z Paper 16.7%, Plastic 12.2%, Food 20.5%,Wood 16.8%, Other Organics 15.3%, Metal 4.7%,Glass 2.6%, Electronics 0.4%, Household Hazardous Waste 0.9%. 3 2015 Waste Categorization material categories that create WARM offsets when landfilled include corrugated containers 3%, Dimensional Lumber 11%,Yard Trimmings 6%, Mixed paper 7%,and Drywall 2%. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july2018 D-1 Att A Page 257 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Appendix Responsiveness Summary Att A Page 258 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) T Q ao L a0 N N M Q) Q) Q) +U+ C L f6 L C Q) "° N N E O Q) + U V f6 �n f6 C Q) Q) '� Q) f6 Ln L a� "O QJ -0 Q) L O L V1 V1 C u C C � QJ QJ QJ ++ U H � QJ "° C U Q) 00 C O f6 f6 > fl O M 0 0 M LL E O vui O ° QJ 00 a� Q O � -0 N Q) v E °� ;+� C mv +� ° c� > N ° O U "O N O L QJ '+ C Caco Q 0 m U-0 n r° O ~ U O L O vi Q) C N f6 �, C Q f6 O C 7 •+-+ �n C 00 C.w O n t QJ fl QJ ° Q N Q) U — LL ° v a f6 E 0 v Q) o Q) c O a Q) a0-O 'O -O L N .E L O Q > '+ •L f6 -a C U U Q) C 7 �_ C C N f6 QJ — 00 U �n QJ m �, L +.+ C E -0 v c m E o Q O *' v ,� c � M U �, a, ao ,� o m 0 O — .O •� Q C U C c Q) > C C `� -° .0 m 0 LL N E o m ) Q) v -0 Q) O v o •Q N N a, U E o E a E E - E Q) a, .N O o Ln -a Q) 00 0 �' u Q Q -° O o E v c a, Q) m � u v 0 .0 w m H Q u m H -0 U vO -0 -00 U H v_ t Ou m H m 7 M 00 O V O N C O Q) N 7 a0 3: u vi ;O L -r- .2 E 00 Q C QJ = r6 *' 00Q) + a O +' QJ Q) L C L E >' C fC6 C > CO "O "O ° vOi 'U f6 f6 C E I O C Q- Q) L ?j M *' .Lu -a m \ •E CO -0 E C •C f�6 V C 00 C QJ -° m LU N ) 00 U '^� 0 OC: C VI Q > O •O •L •++ t ° ? m Q) U +� *' •E U ro ro c .^_� o E 0 ro a a= E +, '+� •+� C N C Q) O E U Q) O Q > U x ,� U _ - m C N N L °' o °�' v c E `° c m 5 °- .Q Q) c o L ao +� v U -0 (p Q) C f6 Q) O Q) C O O Q E m o- ° Q 'N ° QJ c +J N C +J L E -° -° - +' C U C Q) fl- O QJ Q ° QJ c L c C a fl- U L N O f6 +r v c m N 0 o ° 0 o � -0 a, u u 0 c a U bD O 0 v m Y .� v aco E v c v 0- o C c E a > O 0 o c U +� V U v +C+ — cf6 .E V U iE C a-.+ +.+ +' O "° N L •� U N 00 C E L C fl- 'O f0 QJ '� C QJ - C fC6 v O C 'n U C N f6 +-+ '° `� O .O fC6 U •° E ar °) o .� 3 c e f6 c Q) c E = a, m m - -0 M- -0 o aJ +� c 0 a ° -a 0 u w 0 �, c E> 75 U O U 0 - ro 0 +� E = u 0 U 4, c c - O +H+ -� N f0 L QJ m 7 N C f6 �n t,, > N ° vCi '� C w w >- >, Q) •i O C C O +' O i 0 Q C i C c +' `° tjo Q) r' o o v ° u O E E m a, E tv c E Q) -N c c -0 a°0 a o .� E o > C7 .2 •� * v N c N c O t Q x Q) a0o E c o - m N - -0 E — u oo m o I m Em � v � n — ns o Q) m n v v ao c c u c ao +� °� c •*' 0 0 > v -O QJ i QJ o QJ — Q) O Q .E Ou QJ O Y O "O .� Q) O m — 'O .0 r6 0 Q f0 C O N > L L 7 N Q) 'n Q) � L O "O X *' vl 7 N > N Q L O 4100 N 'n 3 L ti 02S N N L d U W r3 I- O d CL s 0 4 4 N rz) rz) aS Z p Q Q W O 0C ,V U X "O Qr i0 'Q in O i 3 01 01 C O O - O �. m dLd Q) a aQ 3 a u a a E Q fl- f6 f6 L f6 E a Uf6 N f6 N Q t t � t p Qr u O 01 t t E Q U U .s v U u cc U -I U d U d 7 N Vf L H r ice+ Q) Q) Q) Q) > d r Em = o o o o O Q) a C o o o o L N L N L N L N Ol V Li U N N N N > 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 259 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 L v a0 0 ° u > 4 C a0 -a c Q) 0 v c d w ns +° m o b.0 a) O J L X m � 00C vC N C Q b.0C m N Co r v v E L CL Q) v `L° o a an vi o N L -O N L U LL i6 N O a; U � ~ H 0 U o0 m 0 v C L U ° C O N 0 v O v v O aJ 0 ns Q O — 0 -a C iE v m m a0o v NC >= f6 0 +J Q C E C 00 N f6 C 7 OU C u C O C O N ao 0 0 -a Q) o a, N Q E y� �n �, O Y �O C �6 0 Y o aCi 0) C 3 '+� o ° a s E .o a v 0 Q) Q) a, o E O E a N -a 0 a, m u c N .F > E Q) C u Q) o E � w � -0 L °� v a v ° u o L am m o o Q) m f6 0U' M y CL N C: Q) Q) -a C v Q) a' N = E v c - o m a0o ° o a, o v m 3 m 00 o v v u v a = E Q) Q) " v CO i m N U 0 f O L C O EO — O N U Q E U .L L U N N N L f6 L 'a U "a O — U +�.+ O h0 N m f6 'L +O+ N ° O L C > `� �, L O 7 to N U Op 'L -a N L f6 Q 7 O V +' E C Q C U �_ 00 M "� O ° N O C Y t ns •E '� "a O Q C H O ° L L x •� m u a m E 0 V o )0 3 N N 'U v N aO N L 7 a n O Q u "a f6 a� a� U CO a N O L a O L ns L +� v Q) C C x • a C C L C u C i+ >- L m f6 N O O W C M N n C U M -0 "a C 7 `�C ° +' ° "N + 0 >` a) C 4N U o 0 m 0 Q) v L 0 0E Q) C E ED N u -0 '� N 'N Q N N o a N U Q) = N U V o ° m v 0 n3 L +� v E n3 n3 +' a E Q) °� o a, —� ° o U L 3 a 0 O � L 0 L u 7 E v w C ao ao Q o o C7 v � a; C v m v v a 'E °a'' v > -0 m .E °° � C ° O N N L fL6 `° a�L-+ •° 0 N -tea m m "a N 0 •u O •O O .> > j C vi ao ° -° v v Q) Q N v v o v v x m 3 m m m ° m o 00 v E c 0 L E 3 Ln C c E U 0 w Q) a, C N ao °�° n3 -a C N o c v E 0 ° *' 00 � c -a F b.0 � .� o v v v v o 3 o 0 H > 00 v = U E m C .� Q) a a a v v ro ro +� v C L a o a 'U O v m = m O O a, E �, L m a, Q fl- U n C of U E Q ao m a v m o .E H E vv) ° H U° o ° °� 0�' � .L v v .E .L v L o S L d — O N N N ice+ "a :� Q1 N N C. E C N N + Op (1 7 Q Q Q a CL Z v V d N N N N N �'`� N L L Q) Q) N L C-4 U L +O+ N aO+ N aO+ +O+ .O — N L aO+ m d L IL Q v Q m f6 Cy f6 f6 f6 (p f6 E U Q U Q- U N U 0- U LL C7 U 7 of y L L L y ice.. f6 f6 f6 � C C v v E E E w d � � � = = m m � Y � Y � Y .r E O O U C C U C C U C C U C Q V N N m Q 0 0 .E Q 0 N ar N > N > Emv) Emv) Emv) EmQ E-Z 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 260 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) 0 v oO > c L -a E v Q U O > aC: Q m fl- U O m v - -CE c 'E N u O) Q +J O u 3 O m p � M v H � - aco v N o N '+, v �' v E u c E m Q) v c ° E ° U E > c o Q) L VN C U C.w a O L U N U m UQ) 'N fC6 a0 N N N N v E ;� v c > *' ,E E E L oo E c v 2 E -0 E (n u O = OOU NJ> U U O Q i �, N L 'O N "O Q N U C C L L •QJ E O O N `� O dj Q Q M C m — u O L O C O CL E c o > °�' v v -a > v > *' O �n U ' m > U* L "ON UL NC NO O +C O -0 O : M UUU N E n CN L N L -O O L C �n C 7 fNa 7 N L O N "O ate+ >� Q N aC0 0 C N O L O "O O v L -0 v N c O O - v a 00 u L - N C N 'O C C N v' U C C C `-' v m = v -0 n Q,.E C u f6 N ao v v H U L H H L U c M L m H CL 00 ao E v v Ln N N N a✓ 7 C N O 00 U a E N fa fNaI Ln> N U O +' L o °' E v v 3 v v v E c H v v QOL _r_ a-+ _ LN U N Q) Y as C: m Y Q) N N N OL ++ fa .� N � O O U w L � N >Ln M N m Q .0 L O C N N L N C +-+ O h0 �n > 3 c 0 v 3 v v v - > .E v C N O O L O U N ++ N O E N ++ L fa N m U L m C .V1 >� C ' O 3 m O .V1 ate-+ N C fa ++ U -0 U — >, a-+ d v v o a; U M -0 L E o � UO m v L E O L �n Y L C L _� O C C p C N N O C N N L L E Q) tm +� V) m oo V '> ovoOv � v c .v° � vC: >o >E ° U ao � = +ac�° nv v U M o c vMycv ao E v +t.+ Y N N L C U �n •}U—, +' CO m +�.+ O U fa L E (a O (J v Q v Q 3 N CC0 .0 .N O' N a0-+ Q c O 3 c N v a - � o a o aco v - o N ar _ Q a c o v Q) O O v c '�' Fu - v v c v +� ao E c� o E E o u � v c '0 a v '� N °c° UO a N .° u o ) O c E `" a o '+� U v -a ° v v m 3 aco o 0 - v u a O UO Q) • • o v c o E a a° E z 2 a Y a 3 3 H a - u- m e 3 v a L O a0+ � L ,s •� � v N a0 u �n N Ln d v v v v N r d u N i c 4 io a.. u O d C. Q� 4 Z5 O Qj I S N CL R i a a 0 •�, QC N O 0- O v' S Z � vi � , ro Q v V d N 'S N c N � N N O N L E L L Q) iT 3 lG lG +O- CL u O v C v >, v E N a '- a r +, ro U u ro +-� ro a ro E U o Cr U z N U U Ln U cn U w 7 N Vf L H C �+ � C N N Q) N N d — c E o o a o o v O O � O O � o � CL O L N L N L N L N V N > N > U N > N > U 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-3 Att A Page 261 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 0 N -a C v Q) 0 a, c > ) c� a )Qo v °� a, �n 0J Q O 0 > C i 0) u 3 o o E 0 v H C a v v N v - ;_ n In 0) w E UO �n 0J a) � o 'E .o U o 0 i 0 Q •Z- m C C C E �n Q. U .� m U •N 0J 0J M fl- t/1 a) am C > H E E tW i M d 0 C L v0i m vi 0J >= vi >_ m + > 'O N > v0i 0 m �, OU CO OU Q Q O_ -0 0J "0 Q 0J N C •LQ Q C v m +-+ U 7 U 7 0 •� Q 7 +0.+ v 0J "0 C m >, �n Cw m > "0 J > 0J 0J it C -0 N 0 a-+ U L 0J 0J h0 C N CN > �O O 01 C C u ou 0 EO CO V N -0 "0 U m U m i 0 Q O L H v .� u n m v H v 7 CL 00 "0 L 0 "0 N "0 O N 0J a� N -0 O 0J >� m 00 N 0 n (*0 0 -0 Q C o E N N E M Q > 0 L 0J C C O m C L +' 0 a,19 =- E C o > v v a, a, °�° o o a, o "0 Vl 0J ,110 00 E n O CC0 U -0 "0 >� a_+ m 0J �n m N E m 0 3 E m - o U U �, oo .2 C - a a0 m E O 0 ++ 0 U •Q O U L L C 0J 7 1m0 C °- m o U E u o 0- •� aC: aCo 'n0 °- v +� v —� 0J 10 •N 00 0 m L ++ ++ Q C m m L m Q E L '^ n m '+J >' .E 00 >, .*' f6 v 0 L 0J N •0J �, "0 C 0J C 0J N U m O N "0 Q 0 U -0 L E O •j m O > U v v > o =a -C m 3 E O C - > o a, C M 0 CO OCO U O f�0 }' .' 7 -a N V N •E CO 0 •ate—+ —vmi M y m U m v oo v U U v m v ^� v m > o U +� oo C v m v o = v o v > v o o N C v 3 a; C o m U a E .>_ °�° a✓ Q v m o ma 'c E o o u a C N aCo o o m +0-+ +L-+ — C 0 •+J C C "O 0 "O �n m N > 0J C •— m N +J E v 3 > a m C > aU 0 m '� o c v v }, > _ n -a v 0 C C v v v v m aJ o c a, E v m m v o .• - Q) � .. o u U U 04 � �, � C ar Q v o v -a o a .� 0- o C U o •+, , u > v C ° m C > ° > E n U � — = C " v > " O — m " U m m Q L O 0J O0 N V > 'j 0J c-I "0 N U m +-+ M O v0i N Q i O0 C "a m m O0 E v 0 �, 0 E o *' E o m _a > a v V Q .'� U 0 *� �O 00 • • • m lU6 .0 +J O h0 _ O L U v m C U o4 m m > 0J O U O U Q 00 Q a+ L U C O0 C n C E E *' Q H 0 v U v O U O = U t L O O N i 4' 3 i d W a C Vf d >� QJ a L C aQj U EA M a' sZa � uQ 00C v V d N m m m a i •O a i d m Q Q Q Q v O ° E ap m m m m rU Oven, E U U U U a o 0 Vf L N Ol ice+ o- C 0J � d Q > E In E C v 0) U 00 O 0m y 0 H n C a, v (D > ) E-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 262 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 +� v o +� a -0 a a0 !J c E > c O E c ao c U a, a a, c N c 0 v — u .v E EL- o b.0 � c b.0v o aJ o c v o w m > . — -0 .! 3 c O Q > c 00 v x aJ aJ o O 0 ao m E o _j m c N 00 •- N .L L �n a) + N +J + 7 C m m L m N ui N N d ate-+ v '� v -0 N 'ro '^ m m Q c O O "� t O -0 N O a N J O cn E LL N > N C N C: L10 EO aU0-a O - a0 L > c c 3 v a, +� a, E u O v E a ,� c C.w O N O OCO N Q N O N N •- E C m ?j C U am m E o N m Y E a, E E E E > a > ° v d c a a, c E o E c Q E E E M v o n m y Q 6 o v O o o - a, - ' N O C +� a u u u u O c a0 u O N H QJ E C N C O O m L O O v U L L N L -a U ++ 'X CL E2 E ao=a o > o > ,o E u v m 3 a ° > u c a, a, cQj c a o bD o o c c o o - � a, c 0�' v a0o -ro a v E �' 0 0 1 Q 0 0 0 c a, v o o uo o `�° o a, ° � fl E -a 00 °J u D- a M - 3 a H 0- H 1- � H a m 0- H H 3 3 Q =a 0 E u m u u 0--a O 3 CL 0a, a, o ci m O N u O m N C Q O � N N � � aao n -0 N E m - C: u v E v O U-00 a e +� O u O O Q N m y m aJ E O uv .fl- C C N O O O v N C Q C f�6 m v ,n — n m n O io aJ "O O O m U m ate+ ; 0 > f6 �' N C �O w C 0 U 0 E 7 N N > m O L N •0 i 0 fl- 0 00 N O m 'U a-+ E N N � m N "a i � C "a m tw a-+ > C N U L Q N N �n N 0 Q) ,� U •� f�6 00 vOi QJ N N h0 m N C N 0 Q — O w "a � a�U-+ L m E p Q m WE -a N Q .0 -a m 0 `— O w O E •c u L U 0 E E ao +� m O 7 O m + v m a a, 3 Z O v 3 M O W .a m a, E u a � u ao- > 0 E o „ O -o c U -O o � > -Oo c u v W m m - E a; m v a, E y u a, c a a m a a a c a v a m 0 Q) a 'o u -, +�+ 7 C c -a tip > N N f6 N °j 'N m N '+J Q) - +� c -a m a m o v v N .�, m E v c ++ c N M1• -a N >, L 0 -0 �, C N C 06 N z U C ao > u ° c E °� c a s O -0 0 a ' QJ N .0 OCO N 'U 00 m •++ M m v ++ �n O a Q v N Q N c c '� E a O o m a, v -0 c a ° m `� Y i i .� a0 a0 C aJ N O O L ao O *' '= ao m m c u m m m E u m � o v a a n � N u m ) io +� a s v F a u -1 m u ao v m aJ m a u m ao v a N N v v o v +� aJ E a E o .E a Q =a o oZS H m H - Q � n E m 3 a, L O 0 H H 3Co C C � f+ M O d 5L E OU 4 O •O C M Ol 02S CL R 3 W O � N Z a ° 4 M Y O U d m a m Ln O m m •S m M 4 of v i 3 lG lG +0 +0 ti a N +0 — O +0 Q m d Ld a ; o- a Ln o- 0 U a - - E p m i m a N m cti� m i y m E a E U cn U I— a N U6- U � M ULL- 2 3 N Vf L H C ��.. C N N N N N w d C EE o o o o o O O � O � O � O � O � a C i i i i i O V N N N N N 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 E-5 Att A Page 263 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 -a °p o.0 Q) — � - C — •— '> 0) +U-+ CC: O U M 0) U .— 0) f0 03 Q 7 V1 -0 v U C N U p aU+ — U aU+ C L n f0 O) •2 O i U 000 •� 0 r0 >= i O M Q M U N E L 0 0 N O N vOi C p O O Q j N CC0 L d t0 = CC: >- >_ N O O N v •— O •C ns 0 i L "a U >� C "a C 0) CLw C �Q' 4 v UU 0) N U L N 0) O0 v E O0 >` E LCL L n3 n3 Q -0 O C C O O L O Q) N 000 n Lu O a E *' v N , CL -0 > a -0 > a i+ C O V1 U L f0 N L f0 N 0) E j M 0) n C C O 7 C O M L 0 0J Q 0 0J !2 0) N 0) 00 a-+ L L O0 u c v C v v C v a u ns U nC: 0= )ns > — Qns > 73 -0 O U-Lo O v H L u H L O 3 CL 00 _ C N N O t t0 0) 110 > L10 'T m U C O i C ++ f0 — C C L +J N ON rzr w t •N r_ 0) 0) u 0) r0 r0 N O0 C O 0) UO t C +' iE "O aL-+ L •C +O +' 0) O) '�, *' O "t3 .0 U7 O h0 L v E O N N 0 ) ?) -O �n m O N O) O t o n CD + `/1 v O L 7 0) +C O ro u) -0 u U LL � Q Q O) f�0 of >• +' O o 0) 0) N c O 0) N O O Q m U 0) +� n n L \ O C i Q r0 U n 00 N i h0 0) t o � +-+ = 0) >� O }' - O = i� CO � 0) >T > f0 8, 0 �' �0) O C +� O .to f0 "a U 0) X t0 0) 0) �n r0 U � 0) i U O ++ v "O 0m Q) 0) 0) _ "O i L �, 0 a>--+ 0) O O Q d 0) N +O-+ O C f+ -C U O 'n Q f0 L ON 0) "a f0 O O) C +L+ N fN0 0) y d f0 >. +' O) O) O O) +� M 0) O0 >_ > N � 0) —w f0 f0 OU 0 L 0) hC0 L E 0) U �_ C h0 U 7 h0 — Lr) +-+ O0 L N 0) m N m L �n i C L m a+ of O) O C L •� Ln f6 N 0) vi "O O N .� U 0J Q" 0) O '— O U r 0 0) of O) C +� -O U Y O) �n +' — +-+ 0) -O ,f0 -i N O f0 U 0) 0) +-+ `u E ° w x o v m v v m y o °��' `�° Q) f�0 f�0 M .� Q 0) O U t]0 i L OU 'E m N 'o LL "C -a OU -o d 0) •O0 EA aov t v o Q) °Jt aoov + 4 > v _o +) U o y > -0 Q o L C U ro U E > C ns O > C m n 0) = r0 Q v Ln a v o H v H o o f ago o \ Q v o M a ? > o N w u ro o a a o �° a U u °) .� Q) 0 +� M o v u 0 a +, E ro v a, v Ln > U C e4 w v a, L -0 v X LO o o O Q) o > a, u > o t - � o Lu Q e0 = U m U N ._^ M n D: v +� U o n a n O U- m — +� C m +� L O O a, 3 d m c > v u CL a � R3LLa-° U- m C L C ♦1 L E U U Ln U 3 N Vf L H r iC+ C f0 f0 w v r > O v v v M 'o♦ -a O) U LL LL 00 E-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 264 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 a0 N a n3 0 f6 L Q) U a) O U N N Q) v O O O O U N LL Q,E a Q) ++ L L ° Q) N 0 ~ u U u ++ �+ Q) v 0 L C "a O C C Q CL w Q' o Q) Q) Q) dv E +, E E 6 L O Q) OO O - o ) N Q) Q) C E O C u >`> ` ° Y Q LQJ O L L U C L QJ O � N �O � Q �O �O > U E d ° cm ° ° C O p n u n3 u Q n3 n3 O H vQ) u 7 CL o0 O .— O Q) aJ > n C v 000 to u QJ QS aO N Q Q E >� C U U ++ f6 Q) 7 a a.., a-+ a L7 h0 -C I- O Q 110 +Q+ O 7 C O Q) - •— U QJ ° QJ m C: ° u U a "° f6 ++ f6 "C v L QJ — M O "° L Q) �' Q) I v U C O t U v °) Q m N m _ fC6 --+ n ° x 0 `� 3 � 'i i 3 3 8 tw w a aco a ° a r o t o C: Ma0o °' -0 _ v C ao ° o o v �' .� u m O u = 0 a, Q) 3 a c t. E u .N Q, ns, a E Q) �' E U LL `° C C o >= E > 0 m C 110 U •� M X) +-, L � 00 N U ++ Q) Q) N U Q) U C U O L O O C M QJ QJ L f6 L > `•� "° Q) >' N Q) Q) U U O L QJ '> '�' U S C QJ o •�n -° QJ -0 , L '� -° L u 0 in y u U C Q o E io ,� 00 > n3 m +-� U O N O +' >� Q) "° Qj Q� �, O Q QJ ^ U C C: "° Q C fN6 m > U E (j o 0 a a ° c Q,, ` o a v a �' c 3 Qom' ° Mo 0 c v m o Q) .o o 3 E `�° a, E a, `�° o E z a, a, 'p U -a M t6 0 U ° in O .� i C +� O U +�+ .a *�' C U - O O U Q Qj L C QJ L �n ++ �n C O O C Ou Q v •� 's 'ro c +J +J Q) 2 a C cCi m o •� 3 E m .o a Q) m a o E ai E C •o a v v o 'E a °� a a, m " S - 3 v- Q) m O o o v •°J v o Q ao , O o s E -- a , v v a m o 'o-a v N - C Z- 3 fl Q) L Q) LL U f6 Q u O C Q C v C N Q) Q) 3 O u E O u Q) Q) X E U L ° L m O N •N L N +�.+ 7 "a C O fU6 U E 3 v ._ 3 +� z +� Q U -0 =a +� C7 m O a Q cn v in -0 Q) L o 0 41 3C L dd � Q) � C '> Q. f6 CL m Z a a0 r ^ Qj Z OC V V d ni m tri LCLI of Q m Q) b.0 m a La Q a Qo O Q E p m o m LL m E U U ri Q U 7 N Vf L Q) _ 41 i0+ Q C C U =3 d — Q +' C _ Q) > LL C a 0 v v u > Q) f6 V U C7 > H 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-7 Att A Page 265 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O c c .� _, ° ° a, O m n f6 O v -w m E 0 U � � 00 � +, v +, v c� ° O °; a ° a, v 00 � °, v O m o0 m O m o C - - E E > u u � U O N •U N W u OU h0 .*�—'' yQ) •� Mm f6 i +L+ t m +6 0 0 ,n aJ -O m Q •j .� aJ C L c L L O C N O H C m ) 00 N .� � N O t C "a N U 0 +� i �, �; j,i N m Q ,_ L O +� +� N O O > C m 0 a� -° r_ E � N v a a o Co 0J a, a C: °, = E °, v0i a E °�° o : .� �° ° o v ° c v � .� E L o v v v v 0 v c .� > u � v n +� v o 3 E E o n °, m - w E O M - �, a, W -0 u c ) O E > M O +� CL > m a c aJ +� +� - c >, u v M 0 *' m u c > -u c E E '� -o '� ao m m v -0 '� .� v E v •u v ca o - �' - ° c v � M •� M a E u V) C c o E d > .� 0 c o �_ m :} m .� m H ,c - °, v •° O c o0 n >- ° 3 u c Q) Q) � � 000 as v v � a v E � w E cm -0 u"O Op u O 7 CL _ i N N > O N Op aL0- + •aL-+ N N M > vN �n O �n �, +' �n 7 L U m L O O N i C C N N vi O C C L �n up N C L m 0 O C' u E i L z N Op = ° N ° > O O C O m vi Q) +Q) > N "O 0 u u �n u .+J 00 �n > 7 C C ) fC6 N fC6 N 00 O O N C a-+ 0 v O m N L > ° -0 °, '+, 00 °, m c ) a-+o c u 5 E a m m c = > E a u v +� °, °, a m o Lv m ° a > oa a ° v -0 E 3 v > > °, o +' E u v W Q) ~ > a .0 0 3 a v o v '� E c c 0 O L m 0 O m u O O o O Q O C - a0 M .— ° Q) +� L V 3 u fl o o = a c °, v a m o O = v v v v v � v o o v c °J NL am+ m O i C L .0 C ++ u — i N N u N •C 4; CO O U u N 0 C `i m °LL' C 0 -O 0 m •C "O O m C m u � > > +� v c +� aO E v v z `—° ° °� C v ° v °0 r m v Y "a U L m O Q 0 N C O N N C +-+ -° �n Op N .— C O ". — u Ql u 0 O •O M1. aJ m O _ C O "C aC0 C' E u C o - +� m � c a; 00 M m >, m o L L n N U N O u O v .0 O N N E Q L "O +, -0 N 7 •O O .� Op N L N +� u "O u 0 _, v v v aJ > m o o 'E ° c ' o �' Sao av S9 v a .- °, U au .0 o v v E a0 v .E -a U ° 0—u O � v �' � Q v o o u � L 0 0 Y 3 w L 'n L d Q. CL S3 Z m d L d a a a a E p m m m m E U U U U Vf L H L y ice.. m r C E w > ti0 Y o G E u C v m M °, O a O E > > a V E u Y oc - E-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 266 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 a C 0 c 0 f6 c ° ° ao f0 ry C O O u vi *' > vi u "a > a _ - D- u u N O ++ ++ EL N U L N O "O '� > > +>+ ++ 7 L 0 N N "a C C M N Q O o v a � v c � ao > � � Q L f6 C N 0 +� p +; ro u � E 0 L C Y (v Q Q) WN Y L � L U .L C. ro o f 0 C -0 N o 0 0 0 0 - v 0 0 c 3 o u > 0 �' ,� o ao o v L a E v 0 v 0 0 'r- o o •- 'u E CL M 41Q) L L L L C: 0 `L° o ami E o o ao v o o 'u u E a -0 E s� E v u 0- - u aco v E a ° ° v v E ° �' o >, ° �' Y 0- m E u L fl 00 u vv m � Q) o C: C:m m F > vmo m L -r- -r- > � � m o v - L a u u v H H o.o -a CL 00Q)N 0 N o v c m Q-a o � > 0 u o m E v c v N .0 �; o v c � v c 0 -a 0 �' v L v m 0 3 3 v o 3 `m o v c E m ° 0 ao E o o v o m � -0 v v 0 o v u a c c N m U c v m ° v v c v 3 •0 a '� m C L C m U c 0 ao M L N a f6 f6 N N C E `° v v v -a °' c o c ao c L o v +� c E a ao �, E c 0 c a o v jE v L c > ° v v ao Y °p v v 0 a ,ao ao m ao c I o u E v c +� c ° v c - - 0 3 ao - v oE > .- L > u. _ E Fu o •° v o .Q) Q) `L° 0 v *' o ° o v c 'E ao v L c o E ao � o +� c v v .� v c 7 !a — v C > 0 = N O m .� > v (J ° > 0 'C r6 -° -° a ~ 0-0 *' 0 C c aco Saco v ao o ° m o 0a ° v E °' °�° v ao E o E > .E 0 m v d v c c a *' " L E L c 0 - v C "a v +� ° E +� L ; E °�-° v E E o E ° N .v ° u v ° v 0a 0 o n E c u c 0 v c f6 0 m v 3 v C v c v n u v ° v a L v 3 c o c o •L U ) o m 3 E ao > > v o > v m - 0 v m 0 , 0 -a — v 3 +, ao U c + >, c : m E v - > > +� v v v � o ao v u o L o v ao •E m c c v o E ao v `° o a v v c o •`-' > o °° v Q E :' u o a v .E 0 v o m �' v U a v +� m .- .0 +, +, � v E - 3 o - °� +� a o E .NQ) u v a; > u u c 0 m c Q C7 E o E m f6 �' o a c E m e c m °' 3 °' '� N ao v v ° v ao +, u o Q) mv v _ E '�, 3 a o +° 3 a ° o ° m .c c �' v L a .0 Q C m c v E 3 0 0 c c a N v a 'N o o °c° m °+�' �L�° U m 5 c E c Sao o E C c o m v u -°0 E v �-0 m v o *' - a c c E .E o v E °J o L > *' o .y V v o c u v m E V v v o Q o c v v .L_ v u v v E .� > v u .°; o u v ° .c .E v .E u °; o 'v v a u ° aco 0 > aco o E v .E - o m v a o °� 0 H o v v a .E C7 ao n L 0 0 CoY Co L � L d C. W M Z Qj n V d m ♦1 L ♦1 Q Q Q Q E r0 r0 r0 r0 E u u u u Vf L d C N N > m m � -0 > > c M E c v v a 0 m m a ar V Y ) 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-9 Att A Page 267 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O O 0JU O > N 00 ns o o v E E O L N i 0J 2 0) E f6 M '° ++ ate+ v E N Ou E Q v) � E - f6 N O N p a v v L Y Q � m V 00 ~ v V) Z O U E O- W O L v J O v +J C.w 0J O O O U O O 0J > 0J >_ F 0J d N - 7 E d E CO E L N N ate., O E fC6 .6 L O Q O M mz �n O C �n f6 fl- U O O C v i o wE O 0J L ° O n 0) 0 m CL �� > �' v 'ao u C 0 +-+ i i O C o C o v f6 m o v *' ar a� E m E v Q) m m v Q) ov u o > Eo E � a u C L C U ° Q) -O C F u t vi ns Q) m O t 00 L 0 0J a N v 00-� U v Q u C +� o . o C _ v v v m C aJ N 0J 0J 0J C O0 V) = Vl n •� V L N •� ate+ O ++ W > _� W U aC+ n u N 0J L O CQj v 2 ++ i E E 00 C '� N x f6 O r_ U ,O O C •N � _° C m 0J ) 00 0J Q) +� v M y 0- v E v E a; o o E v �' v C v o- M E o v m00 u 'm o cn c ° v o a0 - aJ a v v > m U v •� 3 v C O ns W v E c t. a C m cn Q O v .� C v U +� v 3 o C > Y O0 u U L A U 0 C +O-+ U O 0J "O i N i M1. O O O O E 0J -° E N ++ H .— v •O N u 0J *�'' V C O O f6 0O O0 E U a-+ f�6 0J •L U >, 3 O c •o m v O •� m v v E v •n0 a, o _ •o .� M 0 v o +6 `° +° v +� ago '�U- c .� Vn u m v o > ° v ° OJ Q M — Q v u 0J +� 0J 0J M O _ L -O Q "O '� M M +� a-+ 0J �n O0 w vCi C 'C W C vOi O U •C Q O O 0J O0 •� in O Q EA L O 0 m .— a-+ u M � f 6 M >C: 0 -C +� N ate_ v m '�C—o a--+ 0J N Q) 1100 41 y ns °+�' m � v E f6 � v C C v ° ° c N E v o - > m +, N m ns oo ns o v � `-' E n u aJ ago ago a ° v N aJ .� o ° a c� a\ v ns 'N '+ a > a; v _ _ �, o E m �, E a, oo �_ m U v m v o o E u O O O w U U U M ±:! � O0 0J i C 0J N - M O 7 w Q Q L a-+ 0J >` U C i ° f6 v O •+' m u U w 0J -0 — U m w O O u ,-I C �n O U' - - M O > w m O Q u E E E v v m m v -a E m o .E ri O m Q w +° Q a — m H ns f6 L O O _y Y 3 w L 'n L d C. CL S3 Z m a L a Q Q Q E ns ns ns E v v v Vf L H C O L L E C f6 f6 fO a a Oo m m CL p O Gl V U U E-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 268 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) Q) �. v O c ns v O) E u. 0J vOi O r 0JaL-+ Q) -0 0 n +J C N m v o4 N �° 0 C: U 0 0J d 0J v N O E 00 c c m °' o CL f Q) v a �' N a� E E o E O d E E � > 3 6 L O O �_ 0 3 0 .° Q.; E o O L D_ > 70 CL � >, >, v n3 o n3 C o o L v ar o a o 0 0 + E mo o C v E Ea > > m . *� o v 3 Q) u c c 0 E u ns ns Q v +� C .0 3 3 �° > CL 00 oo v o v c v o 3 o a oo ) f0 C Q L > 0J 00 (0 0J - �, O 0J -° W O (0 3 0J "° 00 = 0J U m L ,� m o a, -0° 3 .o o *' m u - o o m v 'v v - n �a E a o m � v C u 3 m a, a, C o C a 0 3 ° o 0J O U U N -UO_ v E 30 •}U—, U O ° M � 0 `° O` O '� •� � +�+ .0 •� tw 0 ° O W 6 a v � C +� v C: -r- u •— �. �n L L C *' > 0J — f0 "O 0J N O m — U "O O u m > fL0 i 0 0 0 r0 Y v Q > C Q O `� - � � 0J U U 7 O V1 0J C .0 Q 0J U 'C +' C U O M 00 C f+ fl- 3 O L O -° a, .� O O0 C a h0 C �n O O >� >, i Q V C D- m C 0J O o i •+J 0J '+-+ C "O f0 N m "O -O v� vOi L f0 `� O0 U Q -O f0 .0 0J f0 L 7 f0 0J U C O U O �, — 0J C d O U U + 0J 7 *' O0 O f0 O L > U C v 0J C C L E f0 O L -O C �n0 =3 Z N 0J O E C — Q 00 O f0 Oi 0J M oa p 0 3 tw °J ° m 0 ��- 3 Y tw v C - ago a U C ++ f0 L O aU+ — O 0 � a-+ +J U CO f0 �, C .� m Q •, tw •� f0 O L •i U C ++ f6 >� Q L ° C O L f0 O L f0 •00 fl- 7 L O C �n O L > Q 0J -r- 0 f0 +J E O "° O "° L U Q N C f�0 O O C C v O C f_°0 N f�0 a� U O 0J f0 0 Ol Q N N U E .O O n3 C O 0_ 0Q) u Q Q 0- - L ,� , 0 000 7 O0 O0 C E 0J O �0 0J L �n O O U 0J d C M E C '+ L L Y E O Q mU O -0 00 C }' O j L 0J Q 3 Q N w f0 O ° ° v v °' a a 0 3 0 a v w o c C H ° c p N '� Q .� U E O = N 0 00 •E > -O ns C -°a 0 m 0J U v +� .f6 •� O u v u a - - v m � oo fl m °�' v v C o E -'a �° a v v O .L ° -0a m o m v v ° 0 0 o m ° x v v o 0- u �' ° ° E v cn u 0- z ° a +� -0 ._ +� E = W L L U w - a a 0 v E ._ v L 0 0 Y 3 Co L 'n L d O. a R 7 Z of v v m a L IL 0- Q ° E D m m ' E v _r_ Q Vf 16- rr i+ C Ol O N > d E ns v W CO v o0 0E o -r- CL c o V N > 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 E-1 1 Att A Page 269 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N N t d +' N O C +J O L C.w d � L w E Q 41 C C w E a o -- u u CL 00 0 E +, O p a� Op � O O m Nm U M N a � o v -0 M m O N O n � > L v :u m a - ° v a v m v u a > ro N L U C = O U i N o C N N Op Op U = Op m 0 '++ m m �n ate-+ N > V O tio C U v +O+ C N >' O E ~ N O m U _° L Q N +' _° N m ++ U m O N U � Q E .N 00 - N Q '� c C ° N o +' N M > n a o m 00 N 'n U -O U "O .� OU r- .- N 'n N Q) - 'Q) M ., "O > O U N i Q) a ago N •o o Fu E U E a u U o a a m - da `u0 -0 ~ U C N C -a � c o f 6 c °U' o fl 0 f6 v ago ° v °+,' 00 v 3 o '� m o v ° °+,' ao a U U .--, m C o w > •� m 'u ' o_ � m � O c i v a ao � � v - m 00 a v c v O q U u o v °' m V +, v v O o o > .0 o O c U m E a + ° O ° °; 00 v a, m m c '� 00 '� O v y v 3 o v v +� m 0 0 3 = v o v u m C: ago > 00 v >. o E v '� m m � 3 M 'v ° v ° v �_ a Q) 2 ° > u u `�° > m m ° N v a a0 -0 � o a - cQ) M 3 E o m o � W M a0 +6 > v v iv m y c �° a E v c a �' v ° ao +o ago ° o N .�' E a '� v E a, v a v u O ° -0a a0 � � o o m o `° ° •E m � u o v o v o ° m o �° a v 0 0 E V) U Q ° ° E O m U U (.0 U H U ° v v v E o0 v o ii a s L 0 0 CoY Co L 'n L d C. W w S 3 y v V Z � - d m 3 L d E a E Vf L H C ice+ C � 41 d 7 C CL U ar E-1 2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 270 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 N v v o a Q) v .0 C O O O C Q '^ O Q .- O *' n N C C N E N U N 7 r •O N V 00 E U O U E ° �, O v E n � "' ia c Q f6 E U U O E o Q) N E O u c E u -0 m N . fE O a) O —m io 0) Q) ro ro u C +O, •� Op L U O L- n - •— L N Q) aU+ +' v Q N N O +�, m a° UE .v v } U E E v 0 CL v U O °' � v v M � v = �_ f6 v d E a O = E m Q) N .� E E ° > E o � u E 0 c o u v o 0 0 0 a E o a • �' ° — v c O c oU m U O O h.0 N O O Q 7 >� N 3 N C >` >' Q) +, >� >` >` C > C O Q) L .0 C O i 0 v i O O D U m C O t� 7 L N C C N > n n N O U n E d N U h0 O •E m O O N f�6 O U U r6 fl ° f6 > �n C C O +-+ >' N u c o ° c a - 5 •°p c c v c O c u m E 0 c v m o t �, v m m Q) U c m Q) o � O v � � o v O � o U E E 3 0 3 > CL O f6 N O fl L p N O L N +, Q) — Q) O O — O .� o f 'v 3 3 c E v c O C U Q; v c N - a ro O Q) o •� m m v Q) ,n "O O c > 4; ro v — .v v M .>- ° f6 c v u .c 'c u v U m 00 E v •� Q ° ro "O N O aJ E I Q) ro �n U U `� N i N O -° o c O — U :+� u E c v C u °+�' c o v Q) M1. C i+ > ro N O r- — — O E O °' �, N +, N °�' N 0 `° O C c v > a� m E — +, E o c a > a � m e > v u d +, +, N � o '� v v ° c -° c v E o v -° m v L E +L-+ "O C O +-+ Q) _° �n >, m L vii >- C h.0 N N N U0 �n N Y N L -O "O Op C N C f6 C "a U m •�n oA E •� 3 CE N C N .> 1100 fC6 � M m m +, O N -U° Q) O Q aL-, M Q) U v °- c u v C O o -0 u v .c °tio c v N v w - v O .� v to m E 3 a E m v v LL ° a E Qj v t10o v aCo o °� o �° E `n r° o E o c° w tjotio O O "O •*' 4 O h0 O vi N OC: >� O 0 .M O > E 0 z j a+ U U m N E — •— L '— N Ntio C U Q) +O-+ vOi m m C ° Y .0 C 1 > .� u .f6 f6 N �' U O fl' ?) _° C i Gl *' "O Q) ro Q Q O "O N o > E U +, -° O > aJ '— O E E 0 � O Fu u � Q) o v fl E o ° > �a u v u ,� � N E E o o a N > Q) v 1E � O � v v O > 3 c o o a v O O v .M v c > �' ° Q) ° o ma E m v Q) ° 3 c ° u E ao ao w .� .� > U v .� m m Q) +, E -a m v v E .� a0 m E o Q v c L O 0 3 Co .O O O L G> C C U U U •; d O O N N N O d Q- U U O O O EA w t Z Q Q U U U Y V V d +U, m ♦1 L ♦1 Q Q Q Q Q E D E U v) U v) v v v Vf L i�+ C C 110 110 CQ) N N � d E E Sao Q) v c v o0 v o0 = a a O E CL C 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-13 Att A Page 271 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 ° v � —° a, > a v v °J ° °'a v aJ c m v . f0 a N v c -a i •� H a ;- c -0 ' v m .� d v p +J 0 u u N •u L v 0 ,n N Q) �0., v u m m 0 a, a o a E c +, a, u c v m o 'c v u o a°o u !' 0- 'a v .0 E E E u c O - m � =a a, - a, a, m a, ao O u m a,Q) nv a� ac° u U 0 m 'E 3 0 - m n -0 m f6 v o 0 0 E o E v } c U = m U o o c o 0 N a� o ff v a E E = ao E a -° E M +, O u u v `° E 0 °u' O u > m 0 E w v o� v c a E 3 o v °' °�' a°0 c = fl a, u a, a, o '+� m m n o v E v ac0 •E ° O N ;� i h0 N '� ++ U O _0 h0 c =' O +' N d — c u c 'u O >' ,� c v c 0c0 '+� u o v O c u 'm v aJ a v v aJ - c - v v u c 0- a a0 u v a '� o > o o > v Sao ° o v m o m o w CL m Q Q)00 N c +� ° aJ O c N u a, ° 0 3 o a, c v m °J u •o u i O > n 00 3 c v v v a0 .0 - 0 - O m u a, a, a, O m O c *' -r - +' 00 O +� c c c -° >, _ c a, >, _ �' E ai u L aJ c :" N m o m m O 0- aJ c m �' "o +� N v Q) m ) v CO E o L- v v v u `�° o a c S9 m u v v `�° a°o 0 m c ° °' ° °' O N N m �, o o a Q m a, a, I � a E v .E O m o > n v ate" m m a =LU a ao 0 00 a o � u 00 c ao c 'c O n ° a m �„ m - E ao v a, v c u U >� N m E 7 N N m Up 0- O "O +' O O r-+ m d > aL-+ a-+ 2 aL-+ •c co: u E 0- +, > -0 -0 a, a, O c a v u a, o Q) a m O v m ao +� +� 0 r. E °� +. a t3 v m v 3 N C i+ +� n N N ._ 0co v m +� .c n n 0 i O i0 c > m m N 0 m ro c oN v E '� ° v N° v °tea v u 0; ao = -° 3: -r- v a, °' d c > ° aJ ° .f6 0 °a ;°; ' >_ o o m c - p a' c aJ 0 a - m -2 v Y a .o _� o o 0 v u °� o N .� v .� °t10o o o - v o v c O a a E c -a a, E � io c: 0 a, m y m e a; m ao o v m V o M •c ° v o �' ° c o v e 0 u o M M o .N ao .- u � > E o u -r aJ o +� v aJ +� c +� .� �, c o aJ o a0 m a - c ao 'u m 0+,' 0 h0"O 0 m aco O - u "O "O � V)i N o- O C S > v u ° •° cv N E c � E O v N a v 0 E ao o c E > ~ v � ° E u 0- E - n = Y � E O N Q u N -a - '° O i n c c N O a0 a O m � � c "O 0 of O a, o o v N m > m +� C =a E '� a0 -O •E c v 0 c o a - .O a, aco 0 M1. m c +o M y o 'E a �„ v � a E 0 �. v w v o 0 0 E - a +� m m E ao - a v U v u Q E E v v E L O 041 y H 3 oV L •O O w v L u v , EA d d �.. O CL O � M S 3 U w iz COC v V d ��- �, N N O N N L d E Q d D d E er � O _r_ _r_ E U U U U U d 3 Vf L H > d w E W E v � 0 c m O in a O m c ° Y V V) Q N > E-1 4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 272 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 a � vn3 0 0 C v - - n3 a: O0 ° v ii N fU6 nj �v0 C Q ° u .Q Q) 0) Ens ns C v O +, O N v O v c u u °' °+' c v v -0 v .� v v OCO U a-+ +O+ ate+ fN6 •� O +U+ +�-+ a) f6 ++ f6 N V1 V1 U "O C 7 d o v �° o 3 a, E c v 3 > a, Q) — ° u C C -n u o v p > +� X E a v 0 0 ) v v E m o o 0J S u E O0 m o f 0 O i +� N C E N U > - N �' n3 Oo v C C a 0 E o �, � o v a, v O 0) C N L N ° �n N 0 N O •'� U 'n 'n N O N Op C n3 a > u N a 3 n C v m a ar v a� o u °� .`—° C ns x o v `,° O0 `° v v - ns 1 c 0 ° ns 0 > N O N O N H O C v n3 C -0 C m 3 — M 0 0 n3 0 E v ° f6 Ln :+ .2 L .. L N f6 C i N ° n U E d C C v n3 ° n3 v E 0, n3 > E E C C u > 0 0 .2 v a E v 0 °; � U a E u ° ° v o E o n U m v a � E a > > Q' m o E 2 o S ° � 3:1-0° H H a0 a E v _mr_ E CL 00 +, v o )> c > 0 a +, N "O O 0 N O _ N —O N N L v o io O -0 n U � o u �n � O v 0 vi 0 ° C C -0 b.0 w +J m U N U fl- "O ++ U O N C O N c 7 fl- ,n C .0 —t C a-+ — Q= N = L C 0U0 0 00 O C O Q o N -a E >- L L N OIO O a N N OU N E Q j,— C .N U a-+ N Q) N O "O > •L N C f6 f6 f6 ''� +�-+ "O n N _ X m v >� Op 7 �n L >, N �n C 'O f6 f6 •C >, vi Q C a N +J -O Ln C Q C �n c t. c N O0 � E Q) v v E - '0 a, b.0Q a ° > H 00 a00 ° a ° a > LE 16 uN 0 00 C o • C L +' C U O N L N -° N C t N i O C .0 .� C .� h00 i O U vUi r O o f6 E — +� > O O' (0 C C —U 00 N i ++ f6 C C -0 .0 i V 0 M '*' Q +O-' vOi O N .0 m N Op E N C Q � 0 C 7 L — f6 .fo L L +-' — C ++ > U N f6 L O f6 'O .� t v O LO Q +.+ Q O 'ap "a O tw ti0 ar +� � v n3 n3 E n3 v a v •E C o m v v a s m v v C •;° m o o 0 0 u 0 -a E —_ tw E o , E c 0a `�—�° aM ago ° o f o N v o E 'o �' v ° 0 E a v a°o > a a, " ° >, . >, > > u o am Ego n -0 p > o Q) v' v w C c u ai c .—' m v 0 v Q) -j a, L j m U0 n v �_ n v 0 — �n v 0 L N v o ;6 O i 0 , 0 7 N 0 E o 00 Q 7 Z N H Q U — U L V N 0 U N U Q 0- 0 O O Y w L er iu_+ u a + d � c > +� E Z5 O2 Z n3, ou MO d C. E � •c 'c CL � ta3 iz c � Z � -_j 3 c 3N0 EA o°1c v V Z c C of v nu, .a o d o 3 lG lG — u - S - 0 � C5 Qj Q, u E a o a � u � � � ° � v "c � � m 0 n, _r_ o o s o n, o� o E U 0r et U N 4 U u v� U u 7 N Vf L H C N N N > w d 0 c o o o O E 0 L 0 L 0 L ns CL O i i i "0 V N N N U 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-1 5 Att A Page 273 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) O "0 C } 00 C m N C m (B � U W !2 O •� >� Vl L U 0 v U L Ln v O - v CD o- X00 VV) m m N O > 'u O L C m 0 n C. v E u a N N E N m N L fA EO U -O "O C L O L O L U 'O U Ol E O 0- q-- Q Q -C3 N v -a L C C C L .� C O m n -aa Ol O V1 C N E a ° '� '� E u E c u u O u m 0 0 0 U .0 H Q m 3 CL 00 O — O N O U '� oo N C m N E a_+ -a N N OC: > U a0 N - c N r- N m N O 00 O g v E o .� a o o 'o ao v �, o 00 O N `L° '� .o w O ate-•+ 0 •C N O N O "O -0 � Q Y 'C Q) > � U o a - �_ 00 m C o a- 00 E u m m v v 0 3 a > 3 o u a '� o > v o m 0 C C u v a �o C u u o v v u _a a u m v > v ago . ar a a n - U Q v 0 m - O m a •� L +� L C n O m .� Y E C v E v v C v ° o m .— U .v �„ a, v o .v > w v v v C O m C) ° o v a 'U � E c o � o v > o m 3 0 ° v •i V L Q >- > m a-+ C O O a-+ L N C N a-+ > "O 00 m N o o > .0 v = o ° U a m v v = o a °� '� o m E c v ar a C o o v o o u v �' m a, a °�' °�° o O ao a o N N o a v •� :_ v °J °� v °C0 c °+�' o 0_ °c° 3 E +� m U M= U . � o- L 3 0 a, +� 00v L � C v o Q a Q) a c > > 0 0 0 E o .� v v o 'C "a N m E - aJ O m .�, O "a C iv 0 0 r0 a0 E = m +� n > u E O c m e E O a>o u 0 •0 u 3 > v E E m a o 0 E c `L° v C v M M v u c >, *' E voi E o a C o0 o W C W O O > u .Q o c .� ° �a0 o v o = ago o u = v •`-' m u o 00 C 0- � v c E � O >- . o v a U o v c E 0 o OO mE O Z) L 0 0 y 3 w L U L d Ctw m C. L CL t3 O Z m E a0 E U 3 Vf L H r ice+ C N w d m Eo c E 0 0 -r- CL o L Y V N > E-16 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 274 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O v .-. u m O "O +' 00 0J L 3: C U O) O *' O p U 0J � u +' Q O v '+, u O 0 m N E E -° N Z ) U U Q N 0 ° °Ja v E d � c v Q .�_ E .E E 0J C O + + + + N C N O.w v 3 -0 v v v o E E o ° m *' O 0J Q n 'O O N t O O O CN O -0 O Q, 'C 7 0) E 7 7 7 v ° f6 "O m w E O > O O O O C E Q > M >� > > 0J -0 ON U L w '++ C O +' E O O O- ° U m io y a� m a ,Ln NE .L C a E O O O 0 w C '� O "O 0J U L 0J 'L m +' �O u C ,0 0J C C C v -0 0J — _° u ++ u m p "O m m m "O �n 0J C — '^ .0 H Q C H H H m L G H V oU N 7 CL i 0J +�.+ ° ° ~ 00 OD O C i L C N a, U C m E v U c > oo v O o E o 00 0J L C 0J "O C Q > L U L �n '+.+ O — Q"O L u L O ° C C O 0J 0J 0 � -a `� C 7 Z C �n OD OD O L m 0- N b.0 OL f�6 +L C U O � U 00 00 . N OD 0J O C n C — > .0 L �, 0J 0J U C N 0J m C C L C f6 ° "O u O Q) 00 0 u .� v ° m o E •°� ai `° fl `° O U v m > o v o v v m E Q o v m °C° ° m E v O E C i+ C L v m air--+ O O N N 0 C v Q Om0 N ° .� 'O Q a�0-+ i o _ o o N o ago E a o E C: u .� x a No 'N °c° L ° > +-' m + C ° _Q *' N U aC N > w CO .0 Q N E v 3 m 3 tm O r- m E r- 0J m a-+ -0 C r- 0 O > "O u C X m N 2 0 C O � E v O o0 E 0- m r- - C O D - C Q m E 7 V 0J v a-+ ate+ C m 0 > Q 0J U M OU Q +' N 0J ° 0J 0J v0i m 0 O N U = > N W -O — +' E U OD L m U — O ?) m 0J N Ol m N r- NO 0 ate-+ -0 a-+ N .O C C a0+ 0) r- — ±- m N U c-I i 01 °; u m >, ° m -00 � v a o f 6 : v U c �' v v E � v E v v m a, E m v E v cm aUo -° o a, > E a C ° a m +� ,n o m o > v °+-� E m u v -r o tio° U ° v `I a v c v u v ao v � y C - 3 � u o °p fl 3 00 v fl °' o ° a H •N m °' a, E C E 2� m — v E .!2 E 0 .N m N o o a m L a m E O o m a .0 o v m E U a c = m a, +� ° C m a v '> ai O ° *' �„ v v E o o v O o0 E v m m oo m U o U o a, o � � E c m U v ° ° U ao ° m ai .0 C °c° v v o v E ° o E ao a a w °+�' a o O ° c vUo w ° n c o m v o J aE ° va L O d L d O c � a o 0) � 'oo-o a°o �j � c a R 3 a a � a a c E a EA vsZ b.0 v v Ln Ln oc U a, - � E ui o a0 a0 +U Q) Izt O m U +' u m d L d a a r- m ° fl C ° E -C 00 - o v -r- m _r_ a 0 0 E U -i UU -iULu UI- LL- U 7 N Vf L m m r C E E v v > d b.0 � E E E r- Y r- Y N 0J .r U N o- U C N Q N U0 U0 m m N Q 0 Q C i 0J Q 0J EA V Emv, Emv, 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-1 7 Att A Page 275 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) 0- Q) o.0 � >, v _ v C c U L C c -z'0 z 0N n W .0 O d ao c o a C: a3 v o m v0 u o -0 °J N_ E - Q v o m ao Q) a v o v 3 N3:O O .� 110 �n , f6 f6 N O C Q bf C Q) m E 0 L c E c u v c O c E CL O m Q) u f6 >� — Q) �n N > a rn Q) c E v o Q v o v °� ' d o o E a v N _ o L ° v v MO �' E w E u no m a � v v ° CL c vo ° Q) ° f6 _ r6 ao w O o o v m v v o E a v E u > v `- m °0 = o m 0 a 1 -O L U Q) y c M N u ao c c v N c v o U O 'L f6 V L Q) N Q) 7 Q •� H o O ° ao o *= 0 N N �-I o O }' O "O Q) �` N v v v +� N O r, 'n m � � r6 c ° "O L N f6 N +.+ U N U ) N h0 N v f6 II >' a-+ E c +� L N a-+ � '� f6 > f6 M L Q — -° f6 C N O N "a U N D- m N f6 o c o f o v -a •v u o •� ai v c .c u E - v o '- v c c v o fl o u u m Q) v � Mo Q) +o v v v m v M v E o Q v a E u 00 :Ec M O = E 2 E c u c v 3 c > .c x > o- +� •� .° > ao o `- >; }; c E o v -0 c v m 0 O O m E > r c `�° c v E c •- , E v c o - '� v no v v o v C c > - O N ate+ •� L L 0 N "O L N Q LN N Q) c�c C O "O U UO +=-+ N O N O ~ U n Q) - i "O U OA 0 >� cGc N E .� O C fQ) E 6 Q) +�.+ N n Q) N �n fi6 V V) — p0 fl-L m +0-+ O "O vii Q) -O N N v m Q) C N tio N n m v `� L Q) +�.+ E > O C > +' O hD _ +�+ 110 N � +J 0 Qj M > O n t6 N 0 L O U n c u •� .� N c E C E v a Q) 0 0 v a .o u .� 3 vao `-° C E o .c > v E v °+�' ao - o 00- a0o ° ° cv v o w Y v v v o +6 E o = m •N o .� � v E v I o v v E c N L E n c bf ._ 0 N f6 N L O — c L nn pp Q O 0 c M N 8 c O +� *' U c ++ >, f6 •,J *' G aco M v .f6 +c .E v �� •� u u � '^- � > 3 � � E '� v � aco v � o c m Q, a� > C o °� `�° °� E n °0 v 2 = o m v o m Sao m m v m v v m x ° .E �' v v°i v o ao c v o 0 3 0 E Q E m E � 3 v) E ,� E v a ,� _ L 0 0 c > d v O o d a - a M a Q) o EA ma _ oc v V d ao T v a c E � 0 u b.0 E v Vf L Vf � ++ Ci+ Q) w C v > d E N C v ao o Ef° CL 0 Qj E-18 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 276 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) v a 00 -r- >, v Q) c +6 E I '° ON n --� .° O +, a n c o o Q) o� 'E v *' - Q Q) o C 00 °+�' a v o v 3 N U a -CO m Q) 'O a0 Q � a d +' 0 -FuO U +� 00 f6 U N O } O Q C v O E Q) 0 L C C v0i C vii Q) C E CLw N N L O N U m > — 0 n N N E E ° > E v ° v CLL Q) LU M O E Gl E O O = O .� C 0- -o N N C O U m o N C m pp 0 O O 4 N N O o 0 7 7 — 7 N m N a-+ �n L ' E d O O O m a0 = v N n _ p .2 .0 'O i U N � C Op N a C U N fN6 N N o r, CL 00 f6 v v > o .1 a, o N > M0 r• • v L a ° c o aoo aJ o 00 p N o c Q- o C E L o cv ° H E ° ° a v ° o + UU O N UO V1 N o N C Q) o o M1' *' m v N N , C H --�+ 0 ` Q) N plp '++ G E b •� f�6 n >. 0 C aN+ .N n 'V ° o +' C o U o U �, �, v m M +-+ -0 O v U Q) m C � E v �' a°o o °J v N U - n m ° -° O o C t. v w v -0 a m > - +� v - v � m c U > E a, m o Q) v m O o - m Q) o v 3 0 L E Q) 0 Q 0 aJ aJ u C v O m Q) N C C c m m E v m 0 V °�°o >` v Q) u w u v o `n v - t v a°o u ao°; Q) °J m °) 'O N -0 0O vi -0 o 7 a_+ O m +�+ � � N Q N � N 00 a-+ O O E aJ O O N 0 `� v `� ro m m O E O m m . .n +� m m > v '0 C +J U O �n C Q) C Op N �, N O +J — i' �, O +J O m ++ C — m N C > X Op N m N N O O Q) Q Q L N N C m 0 N m 7 C OCO N v' +� U �' N ' 0EA U0 O N 0 U N C N C C �n iJ fl- U a� +' — �O .m � vOi -00 N O v O m O Q U m v m U O L m 0 Q i 7 n C U am-� >, +J U O Q) -r- L C L N 0 a-� — C N '� C .� >� +J O +J Q O Qj U J N >. C m f�6 Q L a-+ L �' C O 0- M tao OCO�- Y fE6 C U OCO 0- N f6 N o +� +� 0 3 0 m o C U aJ aJ .- E m m 0L10 ° c �' v Q, oE O -o o , o v m o m o o o Y E o o ~ m ~ o m E '�n N +-+ 7 fl- LL '+J +-+ E _ +-+ Y �n > i "O U � LL Q m L �t E -1 0) N -° K1 U -° L 0 +., 3 _y L ado ado Vf W C d d 'o � � C �' 0 U U 5L Q C R 7 L N N � S LL Q Qj 1E Z m Q m Q Q E ap m Q) m m E U v) v v Vf L 0 Qj H _ C i+ Gl > E v) U N N - N C E n .0 CL 0 C a > a V Q cn 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-19 Att A Page 277 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N 0) d t N O p c c c c Q Q) Q) Q) Q) N E E E E d E E E E i O O O O O Gl E O O O O CL 7 aO O O O O E O) 7 7 7 7 O O O O O u c c c c u ns ns ns ns .0 H H H H CL N 00 Mc O v v ° v N 000 L ° O u +L-+ N '� O^ U Q C 0J O t +� j v *' o 3 a, c c > v c v v E o = bb N L p 0 3 O c ° c a; - >, v > o N o o ro ° O N ~ Q O 0 •- -a r6 O o vi 0J U O , i .- �, 0J 0 0 m v o .c n3 ° U 3 — o v — E o v +� v v c -0 r, ao > g o m o o ° c v V) n � o > 0 n o o ° U a U E °' •°' o n3 n3 > o c U v c — c • °° v n3 ro ro 00 *� o U 0�0 U f�6 v� 00 '; 0 0J U n O M + 0 O f6 f6 N v •� 0J = 0- Q) v n3 3 •� N +� E .E 3 •� — v c +� - N O a0o o E o v aJ Q 'U O m u O L Q, -a +.+ 00 7 N N -0 t c v v U +� v n3 0 .— o a, °�Eo .L E -6 m v °J v N o 'v o -°0a v o o �° E m o c `�° 0 E c o o v L EQj c O O N 5 :O 0000 0J N ate-+ U O i c C O a0 +L-+ v c o- O i 0 000 >, +L-' > n M Y H E m v v v 000 O O Q v V C vi C "° o U 0-L fl- 7 U +0-+ u C M U -0 00 0J +o E O o Q U OU o O O n m Q) yU, v Q W r6 �n v 'v 'n o 0 N O yC, N Q 0J H 0J > O �' 7 ° Y Q > +�.+ >' a0+ 0J _° f6 o^ v _ c N .v '� ° 0 E c > o ° v o � >, 0 - - ° 3 0 0 EA N c m H m U v L "0 0J d of L '� v t10 >� ° 0J N a-+ `� U >` f0 i c U - Q v ns +� aJ E ns c c c o c 'ao o -0 c N ; +, O — — v M ar U n3 ao c v a ao > c v a, c o c o 0 � +� v •— c E E c 0 > v 0 a ao v v 0 c 'a U _ aco E -0 v -r- ° v ? v u o v v •E m m 0 U v '� o aco c E v Qu °� 0 v Q) u QU v f�6 n o o f 0 O O °+' ° NO N f�6 :� O N < o O N t N L N f�6 N U N N u t U E U c ++ a0 H U ++ ++ �n fl- Q > U Q "O Q 0J U Q ++ i ++ L E .n v - (6 - c L O +, 3 _y L a�0 a�0 a�0 a�0 Q W dQj 0 .0 uu u u 4' U U U U Q M 3 0J 0J 0J 0J EA m Qj Z +0. +0. m a L a Q Q Q Q E n3 n3 n3 n3 E U U U U Vf L H C ice+ C � w ° b.0 L Vf E c .2 C E c c o n CL O L i a V Q U E vv OC - E-20 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 278 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 °�' u '� °�' o }' o O 00 ++ V)o 1E5 ti0 > V1 > V1 U C n N m >, N L 0) L !2 V1 •V 0)m L .� 0J C w C + 0) E U �' E >, O C m C m r m 0) �' � m NO 0J "O O > *� p > *� p O0J m O >; "a U -a U L U yi 0J C 0J C Vl L O Vl H M H p0 C O O C °U .0 O 4-+ C.w w V) 00 0J 0J > 0J > 0J N E � -° a v > E v >, E E o m c - E - E - E CD u v QJ E O J '^ U O m O m O CL > 3 C E v v > > > > > +J m C O m am-+ O UO a�0-+ ate•+ UO a�0-+ ate•+ f0 O V) O O ^m C O Q) U > O > u C O C ,n d; 00 C Q) 0J C 0J N C M -0 MM MM u m u m .0 o ° E 3 E -ma v H E -ma v H CL L v 0 -0 e4 >, v v ° +, -a m aJ ° eo + �, o a m _ m N E ate.., Y 7 'a 'U 0J V°1 N -a +�-+ 0J 0 +�-+ N 0J -0 0J - >� - L ,� �n 00 i 0J m 0J N d n E a 0 U L -0 m O L O O0 L aJ T m C m O O > >, O v +� E +� m m > 0 0 0 t e0 O v aJ v c 0 v `.t o N m L ° a _ E E a > a v a o Q m e v v u oo °; O a; v m ao v v ° o ° E v v C .E 0 v O �_ - v v ao -a L 0 Q 0 O t L ,N C N C 0J O0 U m +, _ E +� o +� C v oo O -a m m > U m 3 c t. v .N � w o 0 w a — o v .o -0 o aEo E m v a °' m c > V _ C C E a M v v +, L Q a 0 °p _ E Vi m m o a o o m v o u aJ ° 0 0 °' Q C U 0 �, v a aJ > v V m ° a ° m a °� o a V) E o •E c ° 0 0 > U eo .E _ M C - ° C C 3 O v E a C C 0) iJ Q C m t 0J � 7 L m O C O a L • N C ar o ° - +� t m 0 o O v H C C a ° ° ° v Q o m U aJ t C C u C O a O o +� _ >, oo a C U E m m -a *' >� L • 0 •+, U 0J m m m d d E U -a +� ° - v E m v a a U v a u N u oo 0 C m m U v v m v C O 7 > u C C h0 ° M L �, ,n O M O > O i m C '+� -O +�+ O O N N O +' 0J O 0J 0J *' 0 0J N fl- O0 aJ p U0 Q) E Vo t — 3 0 a o ro E � > � o L E t E ._ Y 0r C U +� a +� cn cn m 3 3 Q 0- Q > _ a +� v _ +� m L 0 a1 3 _y L MMOCO OCO W 4' U U U U Q M 3 0J 0J 0J 0J EA m Qj Z m a L a Q Q Q Q E p m m m m E U U U U a Vf L H d C C N N N OCO > d C C Y •7A E Q O O r 0J m O a 0 v v � V H Y Y > 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 E-21 Att A Page 279 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 U O Q) i .. O Q •� Q) Q) fN6 C fN6 O '^ L O -r- M f0 N L CN m f-6 a0 •C Q O Q �O Q m h0 MC Q U O) O C 3: E X110 O +� + N >= u 0 'N v C C 7 C "Q m iJ N > O m m = � u Q Q OU -O Q O a-+ = L Q C fN6 Q O L -0 N Q Q -r- U Q C CL Q - C -Q m Q Q -r ++ Q *' C z Q O N N E m m E •N E - H v' E3: O E d E o v E E S E E 'v o Q v o C v > > C o `�° '0 0 o o ° v E o o w 0 o 0 +� o C m Q C N M m U 7 V) C Q Q 7 L O U C C C h0 E !2 > am > O .� > �Q C O > L O �n E •� +-+ +-+ "O "O O C E O m cm Q v N m Q Q m Q L Om Q L L Q O m L L Q ++ L Q O U U L � � L U -r- m -0 V) Q 00 N C M1 Q M1. 00 of ++ Q 'N Q v VI C Q Q L m N C Q _Q O Q > h0 110 O O C C C _ L M U .� O Q m .n Q O Q m y N Q C tio Q) 00 .E ; � +� L OCO� O Q O O N � N C um Q) o N m O r) ) w 'c C 0 � � Q E O ) C t. v Q }> _r_ Q)v iv E v o Q o Q v 7to f�6 Q C E m fN6 Q vQi O N N UV — m C Q Q m o E u v Q +� oa C oo-0 v Q a •� Q V E o � v 3 ' a�Q QQ) 0 u -0 'ZC-, v E D- Q) o m - Q � •- Q o Q m -0 - C o m m E Q -Q n C Q N a0 `�° O o o � Q Z t 0 o .m 0 u `° E `° - u E ajo - -0 fl � o v o > Q m opo m O - Q m � t o _ a C m Q E - u Q Q Q 41 O L �O O C .V +' Q Q U Y -O O �- m O ?� Q Q L v C E SE Qv o v•`' o ° o ao oo � 'U a > m Q' c u m v Q' 3 x_ Q a m o Q Q E m L O O _y L OCO OCO OCO OCO +, 3 W r dd � 4' 3 U U U U Q N M Q Q Q Q Qj Z y V C 3 lG lG +Q +Q +Q +Q u m a L a Q Q Q Q v E -C o E v v v v v Vf L H r ��.. C > u m 0 o C a u Q r Q 0 E > > CL O � u v o V aQ) z w U H E-22 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 280 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) O +� a U N U m U 0 .0 Q a Q) o ° c C v v 0) v > _r_ > l]0 - a.0 U U N O LL 7F O C O u "O N O -a O Q X QJ Qr �O N O -0 v u > H O Q Ou 0 L x n Q C C 0 C C — vQi a v °�' E E a E Q d L -0 � C m E E v N E Q' ° 0 F Q ° u E N �, O O E o CL o °p O ao > > ao " > ° 41 c m N .E C � � � ° � C: E a o v v v ° ° ° o ° u *'2 E LL v C C D u C v O > ° t 73 Q 'ho H ++ E V) U H °U 0- CL 00 O ao — +� n a°o a v -2 N +J +J LO > M u C H Ov -0 O N C -0 '� -��' O� N u x0 "O m N N N i N i O N N 0 Q > O O v n 'X +' C c O Qj 00 CO C a0 N () O L � O 7 7 v 7 N OCO C i O O E N L N U .0 C v E O .� O � E o ,O n o .0 E +� m y C v c n v m C m c o 0 0 v u U o o u E m o Q a ° E u v o o _ ao v O o v v � v a v ao " a v � m E U v m O v v _ _ E ai x b.0 Q) iQj i �' u tio ' v o o o E a v 3 -0 -a c -a � E c v E �' aU a-+ "O Q v ° ate-+ N m o C � � C C O U O EA t�o E Ln ar ° a 'a 'c m o `�° m v n o v > -v° vi m C u > a0 f6 LL > LL > O ° m o -aa Q v o (n o O Q ° v m N �° �„ c cin '�' °' " v =3LL } u v v v 3 E Q Ou .L E > v v +� m n n +� (D n U O t CL 'u = U U C L 0 0 U0 0 W C a-+ r C. C > m N S S a 01 3 = v Crcal vl c uo Z m m 4 cn v v 0�C V V dLL n v z :EE f+ u 0: O m U i 3 01 01 *' i u al Q) •C Mm d L d Q v b.0 ° o Q Q ao Q +° c E u v CU vLL- vj UV)i � 3 �n Q H 5 r ice+ C N N N N a pE _ o ?: o ?: o -°a o N o N o N o _� Ol V u N > N > N > N 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-23 Att A Page 281 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 > v L v N � � O Q) _ �n 00 m E U O C "O O a, m o O Q) 0- C d N m Q) a C O E N 00-a O0 O +� Q u +J a N M � � o a o- CN m E 0) +-� m t O L v O n O a m d ate"' O U C O v O O "O u C Q) a0 u O + 0 i C C m U O '� U C C.w 0J 0J > n C M ° U 0J d E C E ° ° > 0 0 u m* )N E N - m 6 O o N '� ° N o 0 3 M O ar E O � O O > -0 U v O CL > *' > O U 'E O > o o C 0- .0 v cn m -° O 0Qj 0 E °) n v n o = C u u o E o m a O -a E -a E 5 u C C C U U a •E m Q) C:u m Q) m v v v O W Q) E m 7 H L H H Q U H U w u > M 00 ) N + C 3: � L = o C > 7 N S 7 7 0O L ^ O 0J n O 0J > O •� 00 0J 0J N ate-+ >, 7 L Qj a) .0 0J O -Q v "° 0J 000 L C N � +U-' ° ° U0 _ m S a s o 0 Q a� 0 o m ° � m E 3 a, o O O C m o 00 C 7 Q U l- m m u i U — O 0J 7 0J N C C v � 0 d O N -t3 C O }' O o a� o o N o a, > 0J 0 a E E �, m E a, a°o E C t. n a .- .E m m m oo U > m v E L c o oQj u E a 3 " °�' *' E �' v O C -Q U O O H O •v, � CO M > m m aC0 O C u L m O V - = 3 v n ° � a°0 o o�S a °o u o °�' ° o C o Qj a Q u m c N o ° E U N C +, O ° m 0 •� -O m o0 'O U a a C j .° m L O •m Q C E J o v a v v o V) 0 -r- °� v `C v .N v 3 ,n O `n O �, � w C O O m v' C m m W — C � +, �n L M In - �' O "t3 0J Q E > W M L +' L U O U v c a o m Q) u `j ° u m ° o 0 0 0 0 o o C E C ° Qj N m C u i a� O0 ° *' ° i N O L E o v `n U 3 .a = C aJ m +� It C N aJ 3 m u •u S ..a, O .� u U i -° C O u > C m m m 'O Q C m N C v o Q o C o 0 o v 3 o m � m v w _r_ o m E o 0 E O �� a0 E 3 m > 0 E _ 3 ao0 a a 3 `0 o d d m 0 > Q. E o 0 0 4 Q m m m wz ED Ln L Z w w v Q) n o°1c UE E x) E o t. m y m y i O Qj .o .� of v C �U •C: M �U .S aU+ M aU+ Q) U E c c Z5a, E U V) G U V) G U cn U a U 0- a° U c )Q1 C aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ m > d m m m m m ro o CL 0 0 0 00 00 00 °a v Gl V N N N > N > N > U V E-24 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 282 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) C M M v C� 0 r 0 N N _° O Q U C N > — O L N U O 0 H E C O }, E v O Q O L C C V) >'-° CL N n n N d CD E v m v m E a E E -0 V) o O a )ns ns ns L Ltao QJ E O - ° O CL > aJ a o > Q) v C E o o C o E a > > O v C .v U O u C u t 0 0 0 t CL Q) C U — O N O f6 N v V N uu '+ t O f�6 i N v 3: O "O ° O "O L C L C N E "O *' '++ f6 +-+ tiof6 N >, L L N L C N +-+ 00 > C f6 N N f�6 L N - M N -0 +' Op +' E 7 c O N LU > C Q0, L N Op N C pp O L O = O U N m i N Q c Op N O O vi Q fN6 7 O +� +-O EfC6 Op Q) C E C ago N C c v ° m o 00 o o v u E o V v n3 E .o a, E c E .� c v vi C t. 00 0; m — �' m C 0 v °' m 0- 0' a o �° m v 3 a, :o L N O f�6 O L f6 C 7 C O Op N L ate-+ C O O -0 f6 C C CO +, E � -0 m .� N E a, u o E v E o a a, .o _ U C O " c v m ao > -0 > 00� m ° v v m > °; E v .� °�° v — Y O O L O v O _ EO v u +6 L aJ ° o v o o u C E o v a, 0i U a, a, a, 3 um Q) C na ° - �i ai N \ u a, O 00 > H o E v E o o o '> v v v o v c n3 o '� E o O O u aJ 0- N C aJ o0= ns > *' > o — ns aJ > U �' 0 c U a+ O C N r6 N >' "O ?j — �' - +� i >,"O +.+ U •*' L +-+ N r6 i E ami v o fl E a °o v �' f6 v ° a, •� 0 •u 3 = a, �, aJ ns O aJ ns U — — � v � O o ro O O t o0 � O u u U • • • • C O 0 .� = N °) '+� C ns r6 v ns aJ E c -0 > 0 0 v Q o v C .� n3 N v v E v a, v E C E `_° 3 v 3 v -a ° E a° 0 ° v ° ° m E O O L O 0 _y Y 3 w L L d r ice+ E f6 f6 W � CL mz Qj V d Q- .� i .- m Q 7 Q 7 E a D m m E u u Vf L H r �' L QJ d u > U L H E =3 U- r C E N O C O O E O Qj V o 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-25 Att A Page 283 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) u _ I C � C (0 u O !2 v '+ f6 � 0) u i ro O O bD Q N c c Q N O L Q � N C. a N N M d L u L Y (O Y VI 0 N Y w E 0 Y Q C O O a EN f0 � O 'n E d A *' c o = v u u v m CL 00 n = O N hD O — ° 00) v v o *' > o o a c O Eu — ° Q u LO O O v L L v L E N v N N N m C f6 f6 ° f6 L L O -° a0-+ Q t6 N C *' ate+ +' O u .v E 0 _ _ +' fN6 0- +Q) N L h�0 h�0 - '� m O 00 M N Q - 3 — � o +, °� - .E fl M v a u m ago u 'n u 00 + V O N O N O0 M N O +J Q) Q n +J N O N f�6 O N C ° m ° f6 M u M v 0- -0 > v v 0 m � � � O a v � E o r° r° Q) 0 m a0 ° °' ) m v E .o o ° .v o o a o.o c C t. v c c ) E — c m L E > 7 Q) x N — L O �O pp C .� f6 O L- f6 "° 'n 0 O v fN6 N �' U h00 ° L .� ° M N M a E � r f6 > u o Q) f6 u O m v °° v '� 3 E ° .° 0- Q) 3 v u - 3 v 3 cf 6 E o m > m 3 c to v o o m f6 v uQ C: v v v v a o m a ° N c m E - m m o }' v N c v o > v m v E c o Y o •� 0 0 3 v 3 v *' N c E m 3 o v N v N .Q a o m o v °� o o 0 3 o 0 � u v v v m °° ov° amNvQ) m v Eo —oE : o v vi v a v .E jE 3 c v W = v v a • c _ o c m m E E a00 H o Z) n 0- `+° u a°0 0- 3 0 Q) c .E E a E m v v 3 v — a E ° v L 0 0 a+ H H d H > C. s 0a � s3 � a o L E a v -r3° Vf L H C iC+ C N � d � 7 m Eo C E 0 0 -r- CL o V N > E-26 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 284 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 U �n •++ 0J N .� 0J O C — f6 L (p V1 > C Q V Q -° 00 N 0J ++ C 0J — f0 C m — — n !2 C 0J > O '+J >= 00 U O) ns Oi .' u 0J N p0 ° Q U v ai a� C C vi Q) "O O N 0 N .� ns 01 >_ C ++ E ' = C 0J "Q +-+ 0J 0 L 'F � � f6 u 0J C 0J C.w L� O 7 O +J Q 0J -0 N N -O E 0 0 0 0J � L L C L N E N d o E ' +� M n E 'm L Q -Q O u v E ^ ,� O t O i +' u ° ate-+ -0 f6 �n y� `� 0Jn 16 •Ly E CL � L 111oo 0J u "O ft0 O L O d N t2 0 O N Q > CO Q ++ Ln 0J tm U7 -0 E Q 7 0J O O O m 0J 0J ho M U 7 4-+ 0J 0J +-' O 7 E d L C ° a u v v u ;° c C c u a m w v m v >, -r Q H u v H .� H H CL 00 It v ° u ° vH ° O N N OC: C — -0 0J N r6 u N -°O ° >O •E _° vi 000 .u— 11C—o E -°O v 0J U �I � .E °' O O �, C ns o +� E C f+ "O r6 O ) Q 0J OD O "n O N 7 O ry '� Ov Q "O fo c u 7 Q o •C �n �o •_a u O V Q N -Q o �o Q •� �o N c v o Fu 0 o o ns o ° vi aJ v a °� '> v C V v O u N — > v v C -oa � +� a, v a > ao > +� ) v ° v C ns E o '� fl -r � ° v v �' oo `° v ° +� C Q •� E C — � C C ° C ° H o v o aQ O 0- Q O C aCC r 0J -00 .� Q aQ O f6 7 f6 '� O +� Qj v c ° o 'v aJ o nsiE `° W > c v - v -z- C: ago E oZS C a, ns `�° E a ns a v 3 b.0 v ago v v .� oo u > > E O o ami Q) tao a u m ai N c o a o v -C v u o c E a, v .o a .o °J v O 'N N ° N m m u X vQ O 0 m -0 o u O +o O C v 0J u 0�0 Q 0 — aJ vao : u v v c o v na u > f6 � -r .— �' ° � E Q 0J � Y Q m 0J Q LL v O N f6 Q Q Q 0J E C D Co L O O a v Y 3: O O C � Q. t 'N a-� O CL � tZ c (D a pOC O V 0 't E u' m v E a 0 a Z5 N E v uv v H C C 0J ct6 > d G Q EC + Z) — r O U C _ 0J O O -r- m C ns v t Q 0L �n Q Q 0) Q = a-+ a EA V N > E m < C7 > Co 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-27 Att A Page 285 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 U c a 0 o ' N L U _ Q O L M O O C O U v +) o N U ro , m N v N OQ U p L c c c E c ago -0 v CL U U U n U _ N a� E E E m E U U d L E E E E EU 'E o0 i O O O � v uO = C: N ro E U 3 C U CL Y C L L L E L f6 U a O O O O O O N Q E O 4 C 0 00"O Ed O o -- E v u C C C U O L U u ro ro ro *„ 0- v > 7 H H H N H O Q 3 CL O — U U U U E N i U N b.0 m N _ N N 7 N f6 O �, M N L O C t .� U -O f6 Q) U N Y - O +j +�-+ .'n U U C O O h0 +� C •� o L -O O _ U M C U C U m m mu > *' h0 U U •+� Lo 0 0 `n v u ° o fl °JUO +, v v a v v o ma _ .� v Q ^ ro N ,Q) U .pp "O O .O `� f6 U O `T- r--+ j Q C U C W U T L U O v +� -O i — 2 O O Z t a, U ',n = +� > — C 00 -O O �n U f6 110 U h0 U L 0 4 L U `� O In U N .0 '+� fC6 +�.+ -O ) C Q C C U O U0 0-L O u N L _ a-+ •vf U C j O f0 U f0 U +� O U m u °� a ao U +� .E ao C U � E `��° '� o E `Q) U E U c v v +� U C t. o o , o �' v .- E �, ° E O a C N o E o o O L L L o ao E v ° m a N O -0 -0 N w a U o Etm � a; • v o .E U `-' m U > U o a > 0 0 0 E L . L Vn i N �— a `° i C O U r6 M U m O O Ln NU C) 0 N hC0 `L° 'O Z "O C f6 O 0 Op .o C �, U `�,° C *' "O C C O L Q C t f0 L Gl O 7 C O N ate+ N fl- O ++ N U C C C '^ f0 C of — of +� L L U O .6 N r6 +-+ o Q •� C -O E E E N N +� Qj i 7 r6 O U h0 O f6 n O L O mO > N '^ L U C N MC N O O C U *' .0 t -r o O t U "O E �n p O h0 Q i > .� O O -a 'pp W +-+ O in O U +J N >',� > O t0 !?- N O E — 7 `� O N C a-+ vi > .- E f6 .0 C C i Q U U U h0 C U U Q U7 '� L C +�+ C N ate+ •- +' C '++ U O .V U ++ U f6 Y of U .0 O U U m '� E N 0 U OU C w O C U O 'C: o0 h0 O f6 '� C L E *' +>+ U .� L Q f0 O C i U o O O C f6 O O H O U -0 U U U L O U E -O .0 Z v Y OU vOi O U .0 E E H Q) -iU E = U a m m C Q U a 3 U 6- - _ L O O __yy Vf 3W L N N L d v1 EA d d J3 >• m O Cr 4'L U I Q S3 0 N Z a o v V d o in in in m3 R R aO+ U N aO+ aO+ aO+ E U m m U U U 3 Vf L U U Gl ��.. � Q Q � i In E Z i � i Y -a O mU ro U M O v F v Q O 'E EA V C7 > C7 >E oc — E-28 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 286 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) v -0 C L U N m (0 U .O "O UO !2 C U U n C O N i Q C >, r a m U O N E v N N O O = In N ` U t w -0 �, v z N O U- _r_ +J U +� v 0 c O In C c c E L >_ E E 0 U E i O 'n U OO L O i 0 Q) � i O •Gl E O In -8 .+J C m C L m U C C O L ° 0 O M Qj In E a ° E > :� ° E u c mm ° c E u •= a) E o .0 H N "° 7 Q ,n N N iJ In In O N 4(+ ° U =� O ate+ U +N.+ u - � v a; v v m m a 3 v 00 o v 'Z a v .� Q c� L tio In O >` aJ L m C N C O a }' >m In "a m N W O v 0 5, 0 O C .+� O fl- N C U C +L-' -° U 0- f 6 N C •� "C N O •> In In 0 U '+J Co n In Q O O +.+ "0 O -t- Q- Q"O C +J m ?j "O v a-+ 0 m ao v a°-o E ° m o o In a v * v > � 3 aco � v c C In Ln o N 7 C iJ °' `° `�° L a' .0 N "O "O U "O O a' *' °' N •0 .22 i O c t. a c > I- v c 0 E L c � u c +� In C ° � � O m C U N i _ N N N L O Q ° O m U N Q m N m y .0 �, +.+ - N C L �O y d u v p E m c o a o E v °- v .0 - ao c .v u c c o v m aco 3 m +' E i •E o °au 0 LU In v 3a 0 3 o O .> a U In c v o — U U c 2 v bD U tco vc a z co °a v v co >, N v +� - .v u In 3 � c In o o a o 3 v o o n v m c u o In In ° > cw m 'V Q) U > vi C 3 'in .V >, -O N :� +m.+ +.+ j, L vvi �n m N L O N .- L m •- E _ - vf i i v m u •v C N h0 7 In Y +L-+ i .*' "O L i C O U U h0 > O U u C c *' ao �' *' a ° 3 v m a +�0 In In In m v O v v C ' '� v aco D o v .0 °� Ec c v v v m ° ° °J° v °� vu Q)m -0 E cn v Y o o E ° ro c O °J v v a o m E c c c v .�' o ° ° In ° >� ,0, v o v v E °a °>' .t �°' H U ao 3 ° °+�' n ° ° v m o c o_ E o c ca }' v ' ' `�°Q) U o ' ' °c° :t o °J v m m v C .� � o v m O v m +� nn z m o U In u c ° 3 m U In 71 m -0 E L 0 0 Y w L L d C. M M y z v V d Ln Ln m E d 0 m m E U U In L H d r N a7A E m C E C N m a 0 a V Y 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-29 Att A Page 287 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 3 Q) O v U N � C U U 0J ++ L 0 L C O �_ C 0- c - m *' u n3 _ V) N - — m l= O 0L Q 0 0 > C Q a0+ •0 v NC .0 > N O .� Q Q t N ro -Fu a L +° O O z N N 0J- C N N v0i U U O "O O 0 0 3 i C i O o m o — i C i 0J 0J O m L E ._ 0J C C.w 00 C n •a, Q 0 C > C O 0 n 0J f6 0J f6 L 0J C f6 0 a-+ 0 O > N L N o L �6 L o L = L n L 0J U U C O N O fN6 m L 0J O 0 Q)C L N f6 ++ > ++ L Uw E0 C Q Q C "O C n w C L C +' i "0 •++ O U U C C O O ° = C C C f6 f6 O CO f6 f6 E U 1 "O 0 u N t m 0J C LU +' � > U 0 �, C C +' + L V !2 ° o u U -0° O a � U u •O 0 Mo- 0 C 3 Q aJ ns a C L H Z �0 Z u H 7 °U CL 00 v .1 ° v C O 0 �O .0 w W u -° N E U o v v m m ° >_ °' = v v o c 0o v °° c 3 v v " o v °�° n3 C O o U E - n3 M Sao v 'ns L 2 0 U 0 Q ,0J f6 Ln f6 f6 *' L C 0 0J -0 0J > C 00— 0 > 3 O u Z - o v m O m ° m O � m m — O O "O 0 ;6 0J U u — *' cn 0 0 U t N +� O U Q •- 0 C Q � "O V N 3 •V 0J \ C u O N '0 L 0 N O f6 ++ L VI C — 0J C f6 L _0 uo Z N O �O 0 v U O 0 0 - vl 3 •++ v v U U v ns Ln m o c v v O w n > m = —°° +� Q N - ro 1130 u m " m v0 M m C L f 6 ° O Q) v O v O C — Z, - 3 m a v m LL u o m v c FU 0 > '+6 .0 ° > 0 t v ns 3 Q O Z °� '+� U M .� aJ E ar v °� o ° o Z o N N LL v ° C 3 O O o *ui-0 a, L 'n — V) "0 vl 0J L O 3 L N _ y, > +J O 00 Q) L C C +0.+ L 0 C u C +�.+ f�6 U U C 0 N N 0 Q p F L 0 U +' _0 a-+ O C 0 O •, ns ns ° n L ii O t ns v .v C U �' C EF L C M \ N o U a +' 3 ° ;+' ° U C v u n3 v f 6 N OJ ns O ro = ) Z -0 •� C �, 0 U u ns - EO .E v C *' m >_ E 0 ,�, •O r- �' OU n3 vl L U "O cil 0 >= 3 •0J >, aL-� E 7 O O U O C Q '� ° cn 0 0 *' o o o ns Z C u u m n � > ° v N `LL° .� o E +� v +� o v ai a ii a oDo o ° `�° v '� � E o -0 v C E ago _ v v C —_ H — v O 0 f6 0 �' 0J •: OCO"O C 0 C v L f6 .T 0 °U -° C Y 0 � L f6 00 L7 ate-+ O U fU6 U •0J `—° C ° f6 E N O U o U L N N C v ° N 0 O o v o v m v v � v o o m v o o v o m v o c u E C CH +� LLLZ m � � H � +� ._ v CLLZ O U - -0 ULL L O O _y � L d C. M M y Z v V d Ln Ln m E d D ns ns E v v Vf L QjH C iC+ C OJ d 0J 0J 7 E a + Eu u O U U Q V 0J 0J a Z Z E-30 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 288 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 0 C: M 'a M 'a Q) mm O O0 .� v0i -0 00 C 0J u 0J C: ns — O c ns ±+ 0 Q) N ns v Q) -C ° ns = v v ° Q a w > U a w > U O L L C Y = Y VI C Y = ++ VI N N C: Q) N N M N +�+ N >_ N 0J 0O c% Q >_ N 0J 0O c% Q d 0J E •� U i o E •� U i 0 O + > L n 7 C .� L n 7 C .� .2 7 ++ 7 Q a E o 0 O v c O v c CL c >, .o C: -° O H N >, .o C: -° O H N c m o o U o o U C E O c m O c 0 3 0 c O 3 Qj S9 w E ) V) � ._ 0 v ns N M y 0 °J m y M y E a > E Q o O C > E � o O u ° = oc v v v = v c o c v 2 0 u v U m U > v U m U M � > v U t 0 u +� v _r_ c � v — v _r_ c .0 H +J H i H 0 O H O H i H O O H O CL 00 a �, p 0 v ° v v v a o v �, v v E c a; N i N 0 f6 C �n - i f0 f6 i 0J U 0J Vi 0J 0J 1 = _ + u 0 0 3 f6 cin +9 o E U o f6 a E a) -° +o v o M °) :a m f6 'f6 O f6 M Q 'U E ao •�_ N o E a, U O E O -_ L O +J 0 U U U - O i m 0J f0 ° L 0J E > C '� ?j U m v u N C 0J C "O E >, v0i - m 2 M C +-+ -a —O O 0 � +.+ N a L n 00 0J 0o O � — m m w E *' c > m 0 v o > v E m N ° N i U 0J O U 0J f�6 f6 E -a N O `° 0 N 0 N a O f6 > C °'C Q) o O ° E z 0 v 0 v N -_ U a, oo O - 'm +' U N N c 0 v °�° °� a 3 c +� 3 n3 0 v °� v .o ° 3 E o L E —O L 'n 0J "O �' i i 7 L 'j -0 +0-+ .0 O *' 0J u 0J E i O0 = blo 00 E O 0 ° fl- 0 Q) 2 +�-+ "O +��+ 0 'O �' C *' O0-0 O O m "O N C V _ v U a�0 O O aJ ;o _ c �n aJ — E =a O u .� — n "O c u m 3 o v � o v a v ° E a°o > n °�' ° `��° 0 0 0 ° _ ° ° o _ m U x c a, -a a, o ° o a, o f m a ° m m M =' 0 0 a, v v °' 3 � v - v � .E °�° 0 0 I m m o c a, 3 N •�, oo o v m 3 N o = 'c n3 ° 0 c _ — v '� ° � ° m �' ° a a ° a, c - 'm c a a, E ooU m 0 0 °' •E a, 0 ° a Y °a .� ° " E o -° w — - m n uuE E .E � 0 ate+ 0 m m •� E v O o O E — ago + '� a m o 0 L > m E v 3 0 v 2 .O E ° v a c � n3 0 •U o N c U E C N > c � oo E O a, �, +� O c v c v U oo m c — > °' �, m c u v 3 n3 n3 ° o .� c E O 0 0 0 m E C ° v a > 0 .v C ' 0 °J 3 _ U z z a°'o fl °o v m E o `2 u 0 3 °o � �_ � `—° = m O m E v a, v O o E o o m a; o m m v E L d ._ Z 3 O _ O ._ ._ Q U O0 n Q U 3 0-0 m -0 L 0 0 Y 3 w L H L d H Qj d 0 4+ Q. M M 3 y Z v V N N N m a L a Q Q Q E n3 n3 n3 E v v v Vf L H r 0J N c E u E a 0 3 o a V z 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-31 Att A Page 289 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 o v 0 Q v .� v -' -- .N E m m U U Q Q "O ±- (B V1 -O Q > C U 0 7 C Q Q O Q O —U + i O) 0 w _C C Q f6 M Q i N vU > C m v Q Q m o m C + Q Q . 0 �O 0J 0 w u C 0 C > a 0J CL w -0 0 0- .-0 O O _r Q > a-+ Q •> v — O m Q "O Q O 0 > .— O O H O 0J 41 E 0 U '> "O C Q C C U —� -Dm 0 7 L CQj O E 0J Q U N ., E f0 �n OQ E d Q .S O Q — a0 um +N U — O U u C u Q Q 3: 0 Q •Q _ m 0 .0 Q 3 m E m a CL 00 Q) > °) v v .� Q ao a0 m N U O C C C W 'F n C C C •U Q 0 •+_+ Y Q �n M n a � Q a Q a — +� Q Q 00 :}' o >, c >, o m " O v v o c o v *' a ns *' °+�' •°J v °Co v 0 aio v v o > v .c Qv ) N cn � -aa o N c o a .v ns Q v C M 0 oa Q C w E C o 0- Q Q > T C �O Q v p CO "O v o U '� m +� z Q +� OU v .O OU zS 0 � :� � Q E .� � z ° aQo Q a 'E +° v `�° 0 .E > v E v .� C > = O Q Q Q ao cn -a E +� o o o Q ns C c o � ° c N E Q U o Q o Q .E v i m m 4; a C o :`° y N Q O Q f6 UQ .� Q Q m 0- E .� f6 - +Q-+ U ,� M +Q 0 L Fu > >, o a Q c > U E 0 m 0 E ns Q •� z a+ *' ns ns +' ns •o U `° c Q Q E — Q 20: U Q .E "' ,U, Fu U Q 0 •O L U d _ 0O E C N 0 v C N f�6 Q ate-+ C •a—�+ aN-+ > L U aa; E C •� v > o °� Qa •� ns c ar a0 -Q Q v UO 3 - +' E u +� 0 U M b. f) 0 o ano E v a U Q a m vQi f6 U -O C .� Q C L L O Q U- +' f6 �n +' L +�.+ 0 Q +Q.+ Q C: m E vCUA= m O U C O C � +� N N U O �O N CO L ?� O 0 O U r m +� r0 +-� � •r0 .— � 'Q i' ns z v +� -0 U E °c° v v -Q `u0 : v u '0 v o o _C _C a0 b.0�' +� > a -0 v m V) c a v E E c • °�Fu M Q) S9 Q m > m .0 0 •� a E °� v f6 v > o u u N •E v v �, o Q Q Q Q U 0- C ao cn — C '+� U -0 +� Q Q U C Q O t aJ ns a' L _C N m m Q _C Q O E N �J 0 t 0 7 0 :+' t t m E U +, E +, .E +, -0 a3 o +, o Ua mz a H U U aU cnH n Q) 00 L o 0 � L d C. CL S 3 v V d Ln m E a 0 E U Vf L H r Q E C rE Q C 0 a, U E-32 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 290 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn o N � � a d v N O C 0 +' E c L N E N O O O L CL C Q w E d N O y u aJ C u � � � H H CL N 00 ) C N Q) ° N C > ,� C f6 N *' C7 ,F O N N N .'� N "O O LOCO - f6 .12) + 00 O N H a u .0- O +�-+ U _° 'V fl- .'^ •O z N d L 00 •��-, "O 'X v CO r`o o .� °u' c ° � v o C a, O > a o v .� �' v m v v o a �' a u c .- = � , +� v E - E v v O v oo-O Y V O Q Q Op 5 - O +' > '� n Op O > m C a L C C N I C N � E = oo o .0 o C N m y > E v ro ° v m m c N -° ,n cii o m a, .� -° m - O 0- 00 tioE C m E v " ° 0 o N .E v o b.0 -- �' m a° Q) 'x Q a, o L O ,n r6 +� O .,n u O C O C t. +� E v +� 3 C O o - L a� L `r,° a, a O a, f6 C Y O Q •� C L O ++ N ~ f6 fL6 C "a U C O ,� N m ,n L O N }, "O Op,� H ._ O .L ,n N C '� -O O N (J V N O L E N O N Q) "° . r fL6 000 •C ° C — 7 Y N v N >, O Ln E N z +�tm > m v O 0- m a 00 +- � � �, : E m +� m in v m f6 > a, E a, v° c ago m m a o m 'v H v c L C L u m O O O O O Q = L ,� �, C O a.-, "O o v° o ° o m a a, C v '� E a o o °�° u z v 3 ° v o0 o °�' ° v° = E a°o o +' M a °�' E N Q Y L ° C + n v C +� 0 tw n C fC6 Y N O Q .+C— Q O +, a, - a ° o � a a p aJ o o C o c a°o ° o o n° v L v E O a v u - v L a •o o N - v o 00 N o m ° v= °�' - o a, ° o ° o o a.0 v Q m o v v o -a v u •°�_° v 3 E a, v v Ln o E o C -0 � v •" u o - -0 O = � = o u f6 U -° N > O E O i N C 7 0 u 0 0 i •� u L .'^ '+� C O O . 0 u 7 aJ c C "O O C ro O O i L v C O u 0 - m L N O E _ � O 3 � 3 m u EQu �n � � � � � 0- 7NQZ 0 -r- mv L O O _y � L d Q. CL S 3 y Z v V Ln Ln m E d D ro ro E u u Vf L H C N N w E C C Q C O O EA U 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-33 Att A Page 291 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 o.0 x •� Q) c V) 'x c� w v a o 0) C C O a � N v u N O ro N p L C C Q Q) v! N E E — d E E c o L u u O O a E o o v CL > a o o v E c� o o v E a > > v u C C v u > .0 H H CL a v 00m E .�' o v o o °C° LU > NLn v0-0v m m O E o ro v v v f0 mvw o u oo �o O Otz0 •O Vl O = i h.0 O n � O Q n v O v O O E '^ v 00 N +O-+ M + N U W = •C f6 O U O N O + N V) u C f0 u +' h0 n Q u m Q C - n N N +' C O C -a �, O .f6 — U L UJ � UJ — L o •� E °' o v °- •� N m L �, O e4 v ao e4 = _ = 3 ° ° .v c c o v v �_ `�° Q ?'� o o �V +� v `L° '� M v c C C °c° �' 0 0 v n a o o a v a ao ao 0 0 u a v °' c ao v °� v o O u r, °' 0- 0-0 N D- Q) v ro v L VI r6 Q ++ >�L 7 .^� ++ "O 'O c-I O E 7 O ~ UJ O Q) v m c a N '� 'v o m '� o v o Q Y v o � m Y Q on C v_, ° C E C v *' C v > C ro ^ U W > +� v > o E a 3 C 0 +� v J ro L o v m > -a v o Gl O i -O N ._ >, O O > U +M.+ `•� +' +' V) —O h0 N 7 E Co i v O — .Lu OQ LO N ate+ f6 +�-+ U f�6 +O-+ > N i a-+ +�-+ '� -a +��+ W L C L Q '— t]p 7 7 Q Q- OU �n +.+ �n > O C N h0 '� +�.+ — O O 00 '*' �' C .'� .� O O v C W (6 110 L j, O u f�6 z N CO O C U �' N O > h0 N i v i v > O O C N L >M fl- O C -O E C O = Q .0 .++ UJ N f0 OU fN0 > O O O Q Qj V) O N Q +� E ro u O u O 000 u x — j, .Q- -p Z Q +' C E O W C n N ++ C O O "� "� O ate+ C ++ f6 C tI0"O C C UJ 7 L u'rZC f0 UJ N U O .� O '^ +' M y •� O 'ro ro v O j, t O tYo v u N •'' v i .� •++ C om., O U C ate+ U m Vf L �Vf t f0 J +� O N v v f6 }' v u o o ' ° 'x o v E 'o °p f6 ° o o w ° v o o m x E Y a +� m m o v +� z > v C � E u 3 Q ._ U t cn eo E m u _ v L O O _y C > +�+ Oa CL s 3 O y Z � U Ln Ln m E a D E v v E — O a O 0c w d •o ao E r O EO H CL c v Q Gl V V) Q cn cn E-34 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 292 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) 0 0 00 o aJ N ° U E ° !2 2!- 0 C C — O) N Op C C Q L 0 o ns 00 n ns v0i N •C +-+ �n vCi ° > u C N a(6+ U Q) f6 N N a+ •a-+ d ate-+ 0 0 N O U O vl C: •� O Q) N C +' uo +.+ �, 4-; O N U +.+ O N •Q •C: N N N - M >� O f6 N C o E E E > Q) i E E O O O CO O a) E 0 oo v o C O N � 00 •— E ns U f6 + 41 Q C — •- NL L L U u _ E o0 C u O O O O a-+` � tm f6 •� N E d E v ° ° ° u o o C u E c c c 0 U v o f m m m W Q) CL 00 > a c v ago N a, Q) v N C C: � o o +�-+ f6 �n E 'O N fC6 N O C n N C N . L N N Q L o C f6 00 t ro () +' O ?) o � N Q — v U O O C L N N � 2 � N � � � ) C � O C � m E � aQ) O O � Q u .O O -� y +� N N ,� O OU o O M �M - � O � U m o O N N 000 •� v o u C v a, � a, o m 00 o C 0 C a, .v Q o o 0_ = U o m E o °° "C° n — a = � aE -0 o — m ° o U o a v v a, °� m o m E E v E a, a, d m ° v E *6 E c v ° o o v o � °C-° m C N L E n o N ±J m = N > 0°0 o E C > N N U O _ E M O E vi Q 2 N O _� •LU � N O v +J �J �n > _ (� 0 Q)C -O N "O N QJ O t ro ro +>• •� O N Q N O O •� O O O E ON C: ) .Q) 0- C i U a-+ U C- U O N C v �° m m '� m o v �' ° o .v 00 f6 °J E m -0 v v v o � v o v v 0 v v c v v -0 0 0 L E L Q O 7 U i O V •a.., +-+ U L N — N C Q u 3 = o E -0 U o v -0 , M o v `—° o >' m m E u m m O = m .S o .L O 0- 0 o cn Q a +, 0 3 3 .� Q > > L O 0 ° N U atS L aJ a E EA 3 d u o ; v Q) -j CL E > m M M 3 Q ° Q u, EA m Z a, a o0 Qj vV d L N C N ' Q) •f6 v m •° v o 0 Q a D a m b.0 -C E u m v o u u 3 Vf L H r ��.. w d N C O E o o O O O CL O i n i n > O V N > N > Y 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-35 Att A Page 293 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 — 00 x .� Q) +� C V) 'x c� w v a o C C00 C 0 C ° ,C O CD U a Q) v 0 0 N O H u O C - +j n p i C 0 v CL 2) � Y n N N N E C O 6 O E E O N u. +' EOU •QJ O 0J OU 0J QLnC L > V U 0J a� QJ ` U f6 0 C 0 E > N E 0J O � L . E u m -oa E 7 H L 0 OU CL > +, N ° u 0J m "a ° C f6 m O fl- C 00 ° = ate-+ .+' L 0o c m ° 0 0 3 a v Q oo m •° = n 5 - n °�°> c v o ° E c aQ) E .� o a v o N oa v c v Y v E v O a, E °J +° N m ao' o C m *' n - ° O m v m 3 N ° v -0 - a v v U E C o o 0 n U v U - °' O ° a0o 0 E o > f6 o _ .- .- .� N o c o o s u o � � u o > c o o ° " `� N Vi 0- 'x o .° °� o o E a E a°o m o m o V? v .E m w OW a u v v - o Q a; m > +, C C f+ Q C > O m U i f6 iE +' o N E Q V vi >, 7 O C i v O •E m c O v w oo +, oo O v v +, c� U v o o +, 4� +, a U n u L C 7 N •E +�., +�,, a-+ U z C O U U L O ,� -��, N QJ >, f6 'N 0J f6 L U U ++ -° in 0J U N f6 O U C n +�,, U = E - L E ++ �i 7 i +�,, V ° -° .E C C = - - _ "° t °l10 O c-I C iJ > ° fU6 -0 M C V v W C N E;o °� w � 3 Q) 0 .v m o fl .� °�° o ° o v °° v a o v o 'm v v > > a, Q °U' v v ° fl v .° u o o •E v L u O r_ v d Op .> .f6 f6 E L L Lh0 0J N f�6 v o O .a-�+ O f�6 o a w fl- o � u c a a 3 0 > •� c m v > o > u E v) E O >_ v C v m y m C E o C v O °c° u Q a c +, > E E +, v o E > °�° v m N N N N v o E 0 O 2 oo '� � v � a, � C ,0, Y E C .� v a, c > •+' U '� C .� M O a a a o o a v v fC6 f�6 +' a 0J ' 0J U +�.+ 0J o 00 m 0 Q) "� 0J 0- 'N +� "° +' E E "° Q Q E f6 t6 o > °0 m o °J O � E E o x C +' o o C fl fl O a, v E ++ V) m m Q ._ O > n O U U 0J C 0J f6 Q Y U U m m m U >- L L O O CoY w L � L d � � ice+ � L Q. a S 3 0�0 Qj Z v V d Ln Q') o L E aha m o E v v a 3 Vf L H C ice+ O C C > d O ME V) Q > C E +., C U Q O 00 N 0J a V CL v Q E-36 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-_July 2018 Att A Page 294 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) .0 (0 n N0 "O D- -0C C d 0 O 0 m "O .C: Q) .0 N C v v u N NaN+ Q u u � u E C L C 0 C O Q Ou 0 v M O ++ C N L 0 C. N L m N O u + U 0 N y L o ) •� �i N X w •� O O a+ C W N v o N E E tm C b.0 U f6 N m C o d _ 0 - C E n O ° u u a u + 0 m N u N o 0_0 H a u M n CL w C w v 5= -a v o Z oo o - 00� 00 v v Q) -aC - N v +� v v v x o o +� o-0 v v v `�' u o a E v e 00 0 � o E OL fl o a v v - u o o v o C u E o o ° C E v N E v o Q) cw N o a � �, •�_ a N o v v u E o cm 0 — O O f6 O +-+ = L U0 u O U N +J C N N u L u N C C u C +-+ m W vOi — as V � '7n -O O — �n , V C ate"'' ate"' 'C O 00 L U I L C •0 L n C U — -a Q "a O -0 v - 0 h0 -a +� m 'N C +' 000 *' 0 *' "a C L N u v) v f6 N v "a -O "a Ln ap •+� O� C •V 0 7 *' N -r- L .� >T �' ++ `� ++ ++ 0 N N C 2 Q^ C Q N � >.� Q -0 ++ C m v - C ° v C 3 n3 00° +� -a - 0 m v v •0 C t. v > a a C .- ovai a, o v -6 -0 n •x v - � E v aao - C m E •� C 0- W +>+ u O +Q) u 0 -0 M +� 0 +N.+ i Op v •� v 0 +�.+ N tib N 0 vi E 41 d C O u m u � N N Ln .0 O O f6 0 s N _ -0 .O "� - "a O N a+ C fC6 Ou N 00 N a� O N O O 'a +Q) C N —O tib v "a N C N O a� C c V n 'N v c 0 E •x N v o - C n3 H o v ao R u x 0 .� o u o o m o '� o .v u E v 0 0 •N > "a C L, N �- Q fl- N m m N L M i +' - h00 L i O C U0 Q) o -0 v v m u v 'U m E C o ,n a, E a, U 0 v - -0 C o ,�m Q) - o E a, .E v o v m '� a -a u o 00 'x 00 o m �' v o 0 o E �' v o v +� v c �' a v `u' °C0 **0' 00 a, a0o 'v .v °' a' E Et:xa, > +� o °�' E o C N o > O o .� E •ao v v +� .X " o u a o E C o C �' v =a � -0 o v a 3 a H E ii Z a E a, v v E v 0 '0 v 0 v m a o 0 'm .T v ° v u a v v a E ao • • • a, a, v v E 0_0 > E ° o ° m 3 E a o m m m o C cn E u +� v > u .� n3 m y L O 0 CoY Co L L d C. a S 3 0�0 Qj Z vV d N ' Q) o L E aha mo E v v a- a Vf L H C iC+ � C C > d o oE V1 Q > C E — C u Q O U0 N N a 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-37 Att A Page 295 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 V O Q) v � � Q) Q) = v C U v0i �n CO 00 0J 0J 0) O VN .� U E O N O C N ^ u Q E r0 > O Q) ° o ago ++ E U tw C +' aJ I � '+J O CL w 0J o n E E 0) O O O 0 'O X C w u C O 0J O E 2 O E E Yf6 Q 7 n O — + a+ C C ° a0 -0 u - Ca p) _° •E O v Q C ° 0J O av c '� UbD Q- - ti0 . .0 H a, 3 0- 0 E 3 Q L L "° "° C C >� L = -0 00 i "° 0J C w w w w O '0 '0 0J 00 O O f6 •— •— +' O (6 0J 0J 0J C O C n •— +' L > L — 0J 0J L O O 000 aJ n 0 r0 +� "O !n O aJ u m �, — C m � 0J 00 +' > •+' U 0J O 0J f�6 C "O N +J �' E h0 L f6 0J 0J >? r, f6 L C N +J rl O �o 0J �n 0J fl- "O L c I m 0J N ON 00 f�6 C C O 0J v > u f6 V C E 0J > U _ L N 0J C .E L U .� O ° m .N -° f6 +-+ �n f6 N f6 fN6 L m O C 0J V) c-I _° O "° �, "° C .a-+ L a-+ C � 0 Cn 0J E 0J 0J 0 = u. 00 v ,� w n3 a 0 � C n3 O v C N n3 *' N > E �' .� v t ns p C aJ O U >, . +� > Ln c t. C -°a n3 -0 -0 ago ao u E u C o ° ° — n3 N '+� E +� U a, n3 m C O m n C °C° .Z, m '— m m m O v C O .� 'n m O m '° •� ++ U U O N 0- N E O C Q 0J -O *' - f6 .a,° U U N 0J C Y E v •� ao "ago v v `� N 'Q a o N N E E O a o E v v n3 c _ v _ in U M y E O L E i "0 >, L "0 z5 +' u v M L OCO v L L a0 .O 3 O O n 7 Ln N v 0J 00 •— 4; -0 0J U C fY'1 a-+ O �n 0J = _° 7 E 41 C M O 0J >� 'n 7 N vCi --+ M w fl- >- O U .0 N m U L � ° E O '0 O N _ U C ,++ ++ .0 f6 0J > U L +0.+ �n M ,� Q fV L �J M U •N L L C C f>6 +' •O C 7 m N --, +0.+ n3 Q U -0 O U �n `� U U a-� O N "0 Y N O Q ns a ._ — -a m O U N U C L > Qj TI E N v vN v o N � >- f0 C ° 0J O > L O O _y � L d � � ice+ � L C. a S 3 0�0 Z v V d Ln Q) o L E aha o E v v a 3 Vf L H r ice+ w >` C > d O oE V) Q > C C U M O a0 v v EA V aI v Q E-38 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 296 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) U E o Q) O ° , 0) Q) o E > N Q) Q) Q O a Q) Q N N n3 i Q) Q) = ++ N U Q) >r Q) (U6 C C.w a) ti0 Q) Q) O N > oO E E i v O O i a' 'n t6 N •O C In a) . Q a Wi O C "a ° O u O C E tm f6 E 0- -S n -0 n m E +J O — O "a O a ns 0 C a_ u '`� E '° > ao O H E ° H v H fl CL -a o0 cn Q) u >, Q) C Q) -a � ._ � � Q, � -a -a +� Q) 00 00 C C - m om O O � C o c c u c Q) C C > C - Q) 0 .-- v v n m *' a o a as o a .7, O `° .v '� m o N c x "a •+J Q •N �j O .110"a C_ N ,z U �n Qj O� U 'n �n 0 U O v G O fl' to 0J O O r O S 1; M ' vUi -° C Q) v Q) "a t U +�+ dc f�6 f�6 a) ate-+ v E O 0 00 — � C Q, L Q, In -a fC6 •- .}>' 3 u f6 O a O ) -a O W L C C 'L ) Q, u C C +�.+ Q C Q N "a Cm I a V) >, -°a v E '� o c' a u o -0 .° o 0 o a U0 .E o > °Ja N -a ,� f6 C .0 "� -a a) Q 3 � S a) C U ° vUi vi M O W C Q) 1/1 N U m m E a) l0 a a x a E c Q, a) .Z a v x 0 ° v v 'ao C a a Q) a m E v 0 Q, rz ° o c o N m c oo - Q) C o �' Y O C f+ a) •++ L "a -0 C U O Q) *' O Q, .N C .0 v) �n C N U a-+ E C m C Q) — L m O i) Q �' - U O .° U O f6 f6 .l].0 x `� C N u U Y O E E Q) *z, ._ in �n f6 L E ++ ._ aS ° aU+ �, +�.+ f6 Q) Q) O +-+ O U — }' C a) L O E ° C to �, ;N +.+ L "a U ate+ >� = U U r C c n0 0- m OU a O OU o v F .0 4 v O O o N O U O Q 0 •� N +' O +.+ +.+ f6 C O t 0 SO *' C m Q) Q)t10 ,C OCO f6 .� N OCO U Q;: O �, Q, O i a +0 O a) C: Q O Qj 0 U 0 a) C E S a o m N ' Q) a a a .o a= N v a, Q) +; a v aao N ° o E - o Q) v .E o ° Q� °1 v n u o m m mC: u m m v v E o v °a a fl o a c o :�' Q) > j s c v c •E n u m m C *' a, m E +, m E a O C .° a n m � c as o > a, N N Q) o Q) .N °C° C: o 10 5 .� m m ° o 'c c E - Qa' v Q v °a E Z m E a •� o U m `n > a :_ v o v v E Q, ao Q`, u E a u -o Q) E E a w C 0 ` X Q t t t 0 -r- i Q, O t t t U C 0- 0 v 0 t x a E o Q) - ° Q) E 0 n E u O as c u Q �° •� .E '� m - O u u a, L 0 o tip n Y 3 C C L d 110 iC+ L L 0 o d C. a a ° CL M 3 w ai s Z u n V ° 'n In In L 0 L 0 L N ♦1 L U a v ° av ° av E vs vs a 0- r r iC+ � C C C aU+ > 0i 0i 'vfE V) Q >, v) Q >, C E — C U — C U O o C110 Q) 110 Q) V1 Q Q) Q) EA V as v Q as v Q N > 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-39 Att A Page 297 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) Q) c a, � a a v om v 0 O N E N v v N u n p m +� L 2 Q) Q) O N d N E E > 0) O O OU v O "O Q) L L L a w E Q v O O O 7 L > > > 0J Q >= O L L L •> a0) X Q O O O O0J n n n 0J EE m 0 > 0J � � 0J a U L O L � v � Q u aJ c v c c OU H u H H U 7 N 00 N ! 0 14 O in } - Q v°J aJ aJ ao E G U L v 3 * O aJ t>o N 0J �n C m +�.+ V) 0J �n N m i O .� — t t u N Q O L — in C: m �n "a � L -a 7 O ,� m Q +� O O M C L C m 0J i N a-+ +�+ O O m O 0J 000 -0 U '+u�+ 0J 0J Q O O +m+ Q O C Q - L 0J C L C +� Q--a ,n O m h0 m N .� _ U 0) L U 0 fL6 N _ m U fL0 m L M C >_ '� M 0J O O0 +-' }' � 7 ~ '� O h0 O Ln Q- O +' m L a o -a u Z Q "a � a L a m T v 0- m aJ U c v O O v v -i U v o L m a o L O Q m v a m U L T - a, C v v o a E v E fl v ° oo .° 'v 0- =3 v v > Ln a m � O 'u a3 � L Y m o m o COE 0 v E w �' E a v Ln Co m o L •� o O ° N a o a� -0 .� a m .� a o o > b.0-r- i o U v �' a � a - E *' L vow 3 � c m vc) � L *' aJ ao eoeo Q E O - a .E 0 o a, a, m E O o •E +, a, S a m a ar o 0 a, O c v E a; c E °, L —0 � m *' °; � a, , E o Y O i � M� - - 0 W o O E 3 � v a� O -a Q o 0 41 m y L Otjo oo o o 0 0 o r` a v aaoM ". v m o Ya c v ao °o03 o m � o - 00-a - Lo m aJ aJ ° O O O O 1100 ° p ~ *�'' 'a �n .� -a .'� m m 0J Y m O C *' O U E U v o c O N m - v m m y a v � .a E v .0- .o o o Y E a ° E -2 ' .v c .v a u c a m c : v _ v o m m a v v 3 v o m c m Z t v m a a', E v a Q o °a' E u 0 3 t H o a E a m -w - +, H 3 a m U a H L a c) a L w -a E m Q L L O O m Ln EA L v EA d d L v v o d Q- E aa0 v v CL S 3 ii C7 C7 y Z U in Ln Ln m d L d a a a E p m m m E v v v a W d O c O c a y d O O v v 3 m M E C Q L a O — v N Mu CL 0 L ;5- m 0- Q) tLo 'i V Q O Q E-40 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 298 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O v > v a a 0 0 ._ i +-+ N 0J N Q) l4 LL C L 0J U f6 U N 00 U ate-+ E O C ++ Q ++ 00 .2 f6 00 ++ N r "° 0 3 •}, M U LL ro O 0 E 0J 0 M O N U 0,+i� O -r- 0 Q N O ns M i 0J "0 — 0J 'O *' E 0) O °0J C M - -0. � O U 0 Ln O 0 0J E E + 0J + Q O v M C °� �' N E �' 7 _°0J L C U 0J C C 0) ~ o 0J 0 3 N � M U +-+ n n N ° 0J 0J N a� v O E `� c °° 0 0 N 0 E E d L O M E w a + + W c v 0 3 1 v � � E E o L U ° U v U c v N v > °a .� O O O a ° U L C v O w E v o c E U v v 0 0 0 co v E oo � � E � m m C 0 v o0 0 n m O O ° o U 'U E o 0 s� o m ` Ln A_- 0 E m06 c0 .0 � H Co U 3 U .E U 0- o U U c trL H H 00 C i C 0 —O L -0 O b.0 U C n CO � _ = a0 U ro m ar a, a, x �, X - E v 00 v � E a E o v C > �' °a ° - o ° 0 -a o o ro �_ E 0 a c v v - Q) 0 E v v v m a m o U �Lo v 3 3 v E t c v Q .ao aio M E °a 0 o > +� � ago olo ° v v m c I - v E E 0 C 0 0 °�° � m o v T N a c N o o n v C c U 0 0 M v E -- '+' 0 .v v oZS 3 U M 0 0 3 m aEi a c 0 W 0 m o U ° C E m > v '� = > c ago _ E +� U o v v — O U c - _ c C f+ L C Co — E LL aL+ L - M N •� V O O 0 7 N 7 a� U M1 Y "O M C •— U (6 QJ L U E - a0 U +' (6 U 3 0 Q C 0J 'in y d O) o Q C U L a+ L L 0 .� a iE f6 f6 0J O v0 0 U f6 f6 0 0J of a+ E N 0J > _0 N 0J U U ++ M E � c 3 3 ° o o m E 0 LLQ) o °J m y °a v v 0 c C U -0 f�6 C ° u ° i N N U 0J > a a O a M .S 0 0 � 0J +� a, a o f a M Q)v �, v E > _ - v ar ° c o ar u o u w C 0 c M M � U o N v — v v n v o ro ai a y v C: _r_ a, E 0 v o n3 N O c 0 c �, oo L +, +� v +� v >, O E u -° °J n c E n3 E +� 0 M n E ° E v o v 3 M N 0 a°o v -Om v - 0 v O O 3 m > -oo tL c a E v v) ° a H ° O °a -- E v U +, m U a v yo aJ v +� v +� m c c ' `° c 0 a n c E °J = n3 c - � � v o m y o m E O U > � v E 0 O v c > c E E a, c U N 0 .O O 0 U E +� '+� 0 oo n L O o Q v a, -r v 0 N v O O a 0 ° _ '+� c > Q E *' E .v a, �_ > O -° v 3 c LL u a o Uao r E u N o m y v v v v v v N 0 m .0 a Q c G v v v _r ao � a0 M � o v o , v v a, M o L O O U0 U0 LnQj Wd -i 0) U U V1 W •> l�D Ln U U O U •� U C O d C. oo O O M v o v v a lG 7 a a a CL Lr) +� > U d LU �n �n �n �n � Ln v - t. N o ' L a Q Q Q Q a Q fl- N E d n3 n3 n3 n3 on M M - E um U U U0 U o u u Vf L � � � � C C �+ E N 0) C 0J > d >'tio — �V1 �V1 0 c u v 5 _ ?: 0 0 O Q-Ln o Q) CL Q ° 0 '� �_ ° v > > 41 V E m U N N 0 O W 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-41 Att A Page 299 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N N t d +' N O C +J O L C.w d � L O w E Q 41 41 C w E a o -- u u 00 u 0 °c0 'a � N c u +� v O u U M H ns ns o- E *' N 0O U O Q E L +0.+ +�' +�.+ vi +�-' C U 00 N O (J O N a > N 7 u n j E +J '� N > Uf6 U U Y N m L O fN6 >, u -O f6 L U f6 UO =+ i O N vOi N u 00 Q a-+ N � O L L G O O N O N r6 -0 'n u O u v oo C v = m v °; m c > ° `�' v E a, +° m o a, > .Z5E > > •N E c c v > n3 o = v C t. *' c > c 0 v +� 0 O a0 u v a Co m c w c n v 3 O O > c c 3 +� O o0 +� n3 O +� d u °Ja 0 u 00 u °; v Q) � E *' o o v c O _ a 'o a, v w a v c o n3 > n M '- o- = n - L c v m u Y E v °�° c c a v o o v M o E v c na oa > c O .O O o - u M � a f 6 c ro C O Y v v a v a E o 5 0 > 'L (� O N `b "O "O v "O +0.+ v I C Y i n C +J 0 7 •— f6 O f6 N �n 00 N �n '� f6 7 C "O f6 "6 7 C N O '� 7 u p O O v :�O—, O Q N O 7, "O N � Q, O N .O > L O U N - L U — C N 0- N u iJ O L Q) Q) >� O > v -O 7 �O 00 f6 C +�.+ f�6 f6 Y >, E m N C r6 N C vOi }' u > U v "O "O O O v r6 -O "O .� .� O �n N C a E > >E Q) a, m v ao c o � > > " E n > •M - m E Q) o o a v •�-° o m Q, Y a a m o .E a 3 v o o v 0- E v ._ O v cC: - uc 5 c v c o ns ° • • • • • • • Q) E a>, a a>, ° Y v Q) Q) Q) L 0 0 _y � L d C. M M y v V Z � — d m i d E a E Vf L H +�+ N C d u Q CE 7 _ CL 0O o EA V a E-42 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 300 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 n3 ° -Oa 00 .I vOi - 00Oa C .0 c ns +' O c U a v —> u U •� N U •� N a w > o a w > p i � z o aC 3 � z o 0- c Q) •� oo c v •E o4 N N Q) N N N E - N 0JC0 c% Q E N w i O ,� O L O i �O C C .0 i �O N C Q Q L �n ns c a 7 > .0 C -0 O H N > .0 C O C O O � , O v ;, O u a+ C •� O •}, O QJ ate+ N •C 0J ate+ N •C t� 7 Vl "O C 7 Vl w "O E d n O 0 n O G >_ i = �' E Ou M t > v u m Ou M t > .0 H i H 0 "O H O H i H O "O 7 CL 00 N O N hC0 uC CM Q) -0 U O > UO •C f6 ° U Q Y 0J 0J O E C -a h0 O u >• O0 N •C v 0 O ON m >' C 0 'n U f6 vi O •0J O � N '� f6 C vi +�+ ;+, U "O 0J O 0J - O0 i •L �, +, ate+ L L 0) O U 2 E O 0) C �n U "O N '+, -0 i N I E m v m C 0 3 > M `n c v ° E 3 00 ao O v ° 0 v E v ° vi o m m m v E v ._ c L 6 . 0J n >T C 0 O0 N +0, U fl' C .V 0 C O0 L C — U �n L >` +' C O C C 7 O O0 .E > O a "O "a 0J oU -O N h0 = N O N Q) 0 C Q U 7 '� N > O Q N v C O0 O t +L, O0 ` X 7 O L Q w v >' — O N "O �-L >' 0J •� *, 0 0J "O •C "O C: N C U 00 0J L iJ O �n 'n L F i (� E �n - ?) C U m 0J C N OC: 0J fC6 ~ 0J t ate+ 0O •C — .0 — o — 00 U Q '+, 0J � .0 OU 00 O E � N m N -p C O C C f�6 v u •� M V C -°'° 0J v m .f6 N o O C O .0 C 0 - O N o 0J 0 W U +, O Y +, V *' 0J *' � -0 — O a-, •C O U � +, CD "O "C LO Q Q "O "O N L O 0J C 0J > .y E i -0 > +L-+ Q) 'n E 3: O U v — m E poo � ate-+ f6 Q N Q v C v � t Q m m •+, q O n3 L C o O 0 o o O u N C -a L v Q +�+ N v 'C '+C—.+ L C Q fC6 �n 0J ate-+ •+ +, C a a c a v a a E .� w C cn .° m ` m — w o tw `n ° C • • • • • U v C v _ v 00 N aJUO E Y �, U O m O � E v e .E Q U a w � L O 4 L L 3 o d CL CL CM3 Ln Ln m E d D ro ro E v v Vf L H r ��.. C � w d 7 VfE C 7 00CL ° Gl V Q m 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-43 Att A Page 301 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) 0 Q) a a s a °�° C m c a, a, C v a, a, a, C v a, a, m a, -a o0 -a o0 -, . +, O C _ O n c_ _ — O n3 H m U N y,, U N y,, O v Q) v v aJ M N 'O m N N L "O m N N L "O 'n C O > a w > U a w > U — t m N O z O z O O O D u L > fl- C O L > U U 0 H M L C ~ 'C: t]0 L C V) N �n m C O +J C O .� *' O +J C O .� *' O +j +j N N o C v o C v +� - +' C v v o UO aJ C.w m m L vJ a E �_ v v o a E �_ ) v o V) Q E E N +� 0 E o +, O E o +, O E E N i C O L L C am+ N C O L L C am+ N C O O > y, w E M O a, C m O a, C m +� 3 C O CL 0 o N . o E 0 0 C O O m O O m 0 3 0 O v E o w N — N "a am+ N a-+ N "a am+ N a-+ N L "a C 7 N V) 1' "a C 7 N V) 1' (0 N O m N b.0 N O m N b.0 v 0 O M m E d o _ E a, a o � 5- E v ° o C u = tw aJ C 0 C aJ v = aJ C 0 C aJ v = aJ c c U .� aJ u m U m > aJ u m U m > aJ u m m U m C C aJ +� v C aJ — aJ � C � aJ — O M o a, — O aJ o M o m N i N C L 00 N C C dJFu 0 U m m L C Cm aJ +� aJ a N +_ •> m v v E aJ C C v' f�6 v fC0 +�+ C .� +� U t 'O O C N N N — 00 N a ti O N m O C dJ +, o U — m m N tip C O m O Zt -a o � on O ^ C CE � — U m t m C +, i; E aJ 'u C j, 3 O +� m i C i L +., �n 0 +-+ QJ d O O O +, v O O C C dJ dJ O dJ t N O t� N >, m C L E U C N N v O v i L Q- +� O v �O L BA •iQ1 (� c +� aa `ti Vi '+� vv m + O 0 � O C C E u C O u O dJ v O+ Q ' OtCO N Q n N O ON u c C1 hO 'p - '0 O O 7 Q) C do m L E OOC pttio Q) U V) O m + C L m aJ O .� — i O Up C > m +' m aJ U m + C O ++ +..+ 'z0 Zn _ ULn ++ C 41 - c +� C a o u a a, a +, a C v C +� H QJ Y > O O = m +� N m dJ hC0 O ° O N O +' N C •'� > E C ° 0 v +� a o E t Y > W ao m a °-. °�° M O a, E m `� v C v 0 `—° v o ° a, ° E o v O Q m c E v o o aJ *' C C o m m *' U J m O v o U U .� v +� v ro 0 e0 aJ Q O +' m m > +, c N •++ ++ O' i=+ >. C O) +� ._ 7 +� i 7 O) of 'vf U E +' C 0 E l]4 "a C m m Q j, N Q N a t dJ O O m O' L m m Vl Q E L C E +J O O o Cc O i a..+ H V) L 0 Co Q w +J m u L O O _y 41 W L L L of d d O , O r •� i+L E C C to O v1 C 0 d R 7 O N m '0 HL H H > > m 2 Ln 1 2 omC Z 0 v V d N N N N v) i i i s i 0 m a L a Q Q Q ::, .2 �- C E p m m m u a m m E v v v � n v H Vf L H QJ iC+ C O N > _ m r O N a OW0 0+� C w V Co H N > E-44 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 302 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N N d � N O p c Q QC E L O O L w E O Q L C Q E E a ° u c u � H CL 00 v -a -°_ 00 aJ m v ai m v N L N N Ln N U C L 0 .0 = ° 'n �n L i U N 0 7 0J L +L.+ 0J 0J 0 N U.O vii U L f 6 f 6 vOi +-+ U +O-+ �n f6 C h.0 00 �ri aL v N o m U E U - v v m +' u v v v v �_ E u E °� ai a LL E > +' f�6 L 0J -a .� > U 'N (v) U +-+ 0J f6 f�6 a 0J E , - c � v � a0o °� n -a v v a oa � .v - E aom *' °p � > � 00 °�° m 0 '� m *' c m L u- o u O o c 3 a U c CO 0 c •10 n -0 m m a N m a z o — +� c cn +� c " '� a a o •} a, a °� c �' u v :ao v � U° o o c v > v `° ELL' `n L 7 E ?) a - m 'Op i iJ m O E +Q) +L-+ N 00 �n '+J M — _° > +L-+ f�6 +f6.+ N +L-+ W �n O ?: +-+ 0J 0J L C C '— C f6 fl- U O -O 'aJ �n 0J tM E � _ o v 3 a iE N 2 v v _ v x ° m E v C E oo > o •� a � a -a `° M ' m y v C `° v °' °' E V a v 0 00 00 0 ,� 0 c v E v o N v u v o Q o v 6 00 ° m .Q a a C7 E ° o a u -0 N v m — E u 3 a .° a Qj N a E - +L-' U O ) E "a v U 'O N f�6 ° 0J +L+ O .'� u O U ate-+ ++ n f6 v +° N aao E c .v E c —Q' o o c v > E Com n3 +� E ° O 0- O i O ._ i >� M O O �n — r6 '— C vi 0J i +-+ C p U 0J L 0J O E C `� �n N *' 0J O N 0J f�U6 +�+ fC6 +�+ CO CO N u 0J O 'N aQ) 0J L f�6 C C +� 1� N +� O ._ C C N ._ -O 00 U 7 O L M C Qj ° 0J C -a 0J 0J N 0J 0J �n C f6 fU6 a 0J f6 Q +�-+ 7 f6 ++ N U 0J E oo �, a a — 'v U C7 E — m U a — 0 .E v a c c a > aao 0 o > c v M E M M �' °� v c > � 0 n3YL E o c c — _ �? a E o E - v aJ o � > ,ao Q) a o c E � >, 3 u ii v m u a Co c—n m LL v � ou 3 .E m v) m v o v) L 0 0 Cof6 +' 3 w L o H L d EAice+ v Q. N CL S 3 v y Z of v a_ N L ° i E d p a m o o E v w Vf L H C 0J w — E C CE CL o � U � 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-45 Att A Page 303 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) -a O C 0 +, d ago 'v O t O CU N U •0 m - L N aJ � O N a w > U a-+ 00 z o a 0 3 •� M C =a E p o c C O :S O N O o N v Q) ru vQi a E E Q) v o v) Q Q) •> d E E •� U r- .2 L O +-+ G O O O fl- 'E a_+ '� C U L N Q i m O aJ +—Q) aJ .O E O O C a) C m Q) m -O CL 7 >, >, •O C "O O H N m '� aJ C O O � .— O Q) -O O w +' aJ 7 7 V) f0 O O N L m aJ 00 Q) Ln N v E a > > EN o o Q) EE v 2 E 3 u C C: O C Q) aJ aJ 0- O — r) m m u m > v u mu m Q) +� v C _r_ Q) _r_.0 H H i H 0 "O H O U i +J 3 CL _ 00 OtlA C — N U N Q) aJ C .N ,E m X N a-+ N > N aU+ Co y `^ O u w N O Q) O_ 00 U O *' O L 0 aJ U 3 v u u O C y O +-� v v L p vmi N ° -6 Q aJ aJ °' ci u m •� ° v +t+ w "O O U Vim) � Q) 0 3 O m E C m a a� a m > C +� v a C u a E m -0 y o u a) O v v LL a u E O T a w r° o C o 0 L o ° � our > .� o u a) u v � � v E n n +� C N N •O a45� J v m u tip j y 0 N •E Q) t 00 > Z N C L C U +' ro C ate.+ •� u tlA aJ U N U w N .E U .� �n N N O O Q U y0 m U v w u O ate.+ L V) Q C aJ 'v� � 0- Q) m 'in �. 7 O 00 '^ C- y N `n v t v - u m w O H �n O a0-� Q C O aJ 0 0 aJ > aJ C .� = r-+ m > a.+ N — Q O w a-+ Q O V) C V) Q N f0 i i - > oA- t C O m �n Z U O a-+ '+J H O Q"O w Q N 3 C m -a C u u C u N 0 C v C O u'f •U `� , i m •� 7 Z --+ f0 C OU (CO C raj ° m y N O u m y u N rC0 O — mo w Vl C -r -, U +�.+ 'i X 00 L 'N N E 'O c aJ 'u Ln m co m m +-+ C �, ,v L '� Q) v O C N C a+ •++ +�+ N O u •� Ou .O O w u w U aJ vi C 'i ++ "O U �n N N N O U s y m v a O _ a m C V) � v a 04 v +� C 0 'x (, m 00 �j `_' y v O " aJ u y co -O O N U .N U C H U — m C U v E v t o C v v omu 9- c .ro E N o r�o v *' w o o er v a y 3 3 ._ t o y a '� a C a v *' o a z ° o O C y 3 v O � m v o v +� o O N C N C O > S2 aJ -r O > C a C 4; m 00 v L C U Q U .o u i '� = 3 t o u .o m .� O O C v o " C m Q) v c v y a m ' E v E o v v m ro C Q) a v o o v ° C C v E o �, a E C -a v E N i > v O s m ° u o � .o (7 _ Q o u °) o ~ o v io Y o v � m a y v y >t o v c°� ° u Q) v v E -0 `>' ao m a}`' c +, +� m o c m .y v o ou v m u +� o �' •� > v — - C E Q) •E h0 O Q v � •� y C 'a! E Y +�+ ° fC6 M -0 ate-+ N O aU+ •N U 'Ua M .� U _ v E > oo .0 z t E > v ._ o v) U E O v m � a v u u C +� v O m m a o t 3 c v v w v v oo m a 5 v °J °� > O C7 • m .+� U > E out w C y > 00 v Ou Q ) '� O r' ao v a) = a) a ;� .� a o o wu •O v) z v > C v 3 — " 3 '� m v v o o o v E m m o E a v —_ E in E E E ou y v y ; a 3 v m •+� E v E H 3 -00 � o L O 41 O _y _ V) 3 W L N L d rl 00 C > +�+ E N . a QN R 3 N tw v) t Z Q N Q Ol V V d N m N ro a L d Q Q Q E m Q) E v a v 3 Vf L � d m C c E m > d a.0 i Y U U Q 00 Q) O i EA a V Emv) aw' E-46 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 304 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 o C H o o z d Q) M v 3 —° _ C C O) +J N O O r 0 0 v m m m N — Q 00 t N + O N C U N O M v io o L aJ •� aJ m .S n CL w > U a v m N d E C � •+.+ 0 E O .N — L O U O O C L C U 00 UO N vv° =, 0- M � o ° o C C v m E v C E a Q v _a C o a I - E o -0 u u O v .0 H H ,� m O m 7 CL 00 — v c L v O ci 00 m L N ++ C of C U N Q) m OO + � C N N N + N N + +J > L u L = C > N — > t U 7 O 00 C O -0 U N +'0 Q) U v > -O "O i +J u \ O L O +J a-+ "O .O Q E O > Q"O O N L •� C N C N ) � 0 m m N L > 7 0 "O N � ' +' UJ Ln L N +L-+ 7 Q v f6 N ° N U N U C 7 > Q C N f�6 > � UJ C L 'n L ° O .0 L X N BUJ t ° N > "O 00 = N C N N O , O +' N U a, +� C O C 0 0 Q O +� '0 Fu 0 m = LL u u v o m o > ° E o v w m c u a o c Q c v O o f '� o -0 C o E 0 o m C c E S E fl C E E m - N *' O T ^ o o +° Q C 0 O +� °° = =° ! E v C v O ° U C � m x •° L wm x O o o a, �, 00 O m v a E fl U v ° ;° c o m aJ u u m a; U E C O C 0 C t N N N -0 N d > N LL N m m0 N 0 m L x u u U •u •° U u OCO v0i •+.+ 00 m +N.+ 0' +�.+ — C +� _° u L *' Q N OJ > m aJ m a E t O O m O O O m C t 0 aJ t m aJ Q .� O v0i m t O E -0 O Q H .� 2 v �n +-+ N d U O Q O -0 +� a H "O L "O m in �n 7 L VI L O O CoY w L- L- L d cI N tOnd d � N N i+ Ln Ln C. Q R 7 Q Q En S Z w V V N N N N m E d 0 m m E v v Vf L H C iC+ m m m m C E M o -a -a 01EA U LL LL I= 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-47 Att A Page 305 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 UQ) b.0-0 C � L +- •— Vf f6 U 'L VUl "C: > 7 -a N U N O u N !2 M X L C N U N N "a N O -00 N r6 O O Q) } Y t v v Z N O v C '� = O Ma +� OL "a fL6 fl' ate+ •N f6 +' C x C.w N 0 v� U O C N +U -O OU ° -a d N +' C Q L C C •� L 0) v •LL U ++ L C 41 E O C ++ ++ Q 7 ate-+ U N 7 U C N > .O +f 6�+ i+ N N N ° � ate-+ 0 C N Op i C Ln 0 O i E 7 ++ i� 4J N tio E !2 f6 Op Q vUi Op E fC6 -0 C C f6 1� �n U N '++ L v •+' C E m u N *' 'n U U Q V f6 OU "O L H U v v O H v 7 M h0 > v -O i C N 0 'O •aC—,, ,� t C O ;'V C 'O C -O }, O v C f0 O -O UJ .— f0 -O C CO i U fZ0 L v o N a *' 0 +� M C C f 0 C Q N 0 Q C 0- +� v L °°m C: o f ° *-' ° o E N t .o f 0 v � v f 0 v v -0 '*' v o N Y o C a ao o .� 'Q o f ° v v v = O C u ov O O 000 0 0- C m Q o ° ro Y C t a LO eo � +' E v e f0 U o o U z j O O Q '^ _ '+� 0 C to N N •C: m - +; .--, v> > = v to +� O O .— � twoLL UJ C C +O+ bA O °- UxJ O t E vUi N C t�0 UJ O L +� 'O 0 Q m .� N -C C —L•+oira U L � C >O tom 'CO ° O :� OO UO E E , M O v O v C O vv •— v O C U O U O O aU CO > EU o C o UJ oo Q -0 O > O ~ E YLO � m rNU0J Ln m O U UJ UJ U ° > U E E C U v v �}— '� v ° v o 0 0 0 >Ln Q) Ln a 0- ,— ° •O iJ iJ O t0 N Q Q = CO U U v t0 U *' �_ v J .hCO E � M v = 'O r0 0 r0 o C aJ C r0 v� O L v o M > + U o EA 4� U +� � -0 t0 ° N E i *' Y v N .. _ °U v o U C '�^ fu `~ 0 C C OJ +�+ C f0 i U vU 7 i +U+ E Q E C i U>J C +�+ m E o a eo v E m '� � > u �o t v � o z; , �o � T 0 �o � +, — v C � T E p o -O - C � +� v = v hC0 Q U U t0 h0 C C U +' tNo Q t0 C UJ 4. U C _ C '+•i LL C = C v +� o of C i i — f0 +� v v f0 C f0 Y_ u O U v v O t O v = Q O 'O C U E h0 N +� .0 i > h0 C f6 (6 OJ C f0 t UJ > f0 U f0 UJ U i UJ U E .N -O C ° i ° C C ° � � UE E Qc + E L 0 0 41 L N i+ Ln C. a 0s 7 Q- a Z V d N o L E a E U U Vf L H ice+ > > m m C M 'o♦ -a -a Gl U LL LL E-48 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 306 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c Q) c� v o Q) N o a, N v aJ M M Q) Q) a d 0 >O N N O O L Q) Q) Q Q) Y L Q) N Q) E C 0 n3 d E a Q) E U o C C C Q) Q)Q) w E o _a -0 CL > Q) 41 C L f6 U m m L f6 L L Q) O C C E m O b.0n3 .O O > +� U U X Q) Q) V .... i Q) Q) Q) Q) t Q) t t t .0 7 CL 00 � N NQ) Lnm S '� O •� Q) p O N O i O L •b0 .0 �— O ro L S ° d i Q a, +, Q) O a' L C t rp 'a Ln v= 4-- dJ Ln .S U Q of Q) n5 O a' O •O > O Q O > E t10 O v > L C Q M 0 ++ Q) +� +' M U I C6, Q) v C U a - = U L — :+-� o ° O C C +J Vf C '> O ,F L L Vf (0 U •N L E (Cp L c ac °' f ° v O 4� m -a > ° o E o o C o v � E v o U t U o oa, a)o x ° O r6 +� ° ro > O v° ro O Q t t C Q) t -O t0 L a., L L E O n ro C v_ f0 O h0 Q Q v Q) O E aJ u Q O O OA E t0 +� C Q) O E O Q) +J i) O 7 t]Q Q) M t0 O i Q) ° v� C v� O > ° E V O O a E "a U W m W •+, X L 0 ro O +' m U aJ ) N OU t 4� O 110 > Q) V E O tL0 Q) •+, +' C v� m Q T LLJ Q) +' 7 4� O •L U O V C L .0 'O L +� Q) U) +�+ °' CC: v C 'O i Z f0 4� N 'O U *C) 0 •N x n3 � O v O � '+� � O .0 � � O •� � � .v � aJ � aJ N � O C O_ C _ D f0 +� -0 C C Q) v� QJ 0 N v' O n3 O t L O N ro aJ N >• = M — aJ _ O 75 vi E Q) O +�.+ Q) Q Q) f0 i +' C f0 f0 O Q Y -O U > f0 U E •+�+ °- ° > +�+ X _ •'n f6 > ` Q) Q) Q) cif t]Q > = Q) � ,n C .— U d -O E m Q) Q) +�+ "a L �n ++ — f�0 fN0 C C L C f�0 L L L Q) O O ° m U F +>+ E ° > -0 aJ Q) U O — L O U •n0 +� Y O ° U ,F Q) aJ U *' +'C C: •N �' C tCo C U 75 +' 75 10 '� v v Q ro U ro ro ro Q a O �O > E .� E aJ d 1 ro +� Q) LL n3 �n "a E = C U +� +� U U LL Q v� +� O L L N O L O 0 _y +' w L -zt r, r, t�ifd d b N N N N C Q. E Ln Ln Ln Ln Q R 3 Q Q Q Q H S Z v U d Lr Lri Lr Lr +U. m ♦1 L ♦1 Q Q Q Q E D m m m m E U Ulu U Vf L H ice+ > > > > n3 n3 n3 n3 o0Q) Q) Q) Q) CL '0♦ -a -a -a -a Q) U LL LL LL LL 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 307 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) ab > C Q) m V U O C O dO L :� Q 0 Q C N ao CD N L d +�+ a C N O O O 0 L N C N •O C) Q N N E d 00 E O L N u O O L - L w E O � O Q 7 >� a-.+ >, a O N O E n -0 n E !2 > E > O � � u C C C u v -C v _r_ .0 H H CL 00 +� -c c t 0 U O N v O +� •+, v +) O w LL L Vl UJ E .O E v E M 0.0 U t0 °' N O 'O O L u O E -O ,0 O C u .E i v Q v -O '� v _ O T t C) > U fL6 t O L LO O L O L O UJ .E O C 0 00 v +' Q -O v� L O 3 Q N ro Q L +� 00 O Q cn +� M Q C •E > +� -0 ro C v N E 0 of v Q C _O vi t0 .N Q L T Y E of E L v ,> ro > O t w > t C o E > a 0 Q o m c 0 ° �° o ? ° N - L v u �o o �o o M > Q - ° ccQ) 0 f0 Q M E o C w N •� UJ �bA fU0 BUJ E O ,U 0 U C = 4' Y O 'O ° ° +�+ N ° 00 � U C s E +_' > C •° f0 L a ° *-' v :° aUo aUo °J aUo o O L +� o .� v ao v x ao c� v v U L > L L OYA C U .E j U O *' j° Ln =3 v� �.�j C UJ ° ° Q- U U1 L V L v O O N - C v O O ro O .f0 U O 00 f0 J Q Q C V +� O _ F U -0 rZ C L _ =3 '- V m m t]0 C UJ O C C f0 OD v f0 ° UJ UJ O v '� v v E E t > r`o p o v E U N U Q N ° oo ro ate+ O +� 3 v +J U LO >,v CO T CO U O O M .� Ln C -o w + v oO o > , W ` C :C C '+� (6 ° t N C v t0 t m U O v Q t0 .�° t0 t0 O Q' Co — C M w •— E :U Q) mQ ro ' E a N v v 0 -0 w a v o 0 Ln v M 0 E M vi T Q >, N T .v C 0.0 UJ to -O d .O UJ Q .N i to _'^ +� E +� ° +� +� f0 C Q +' v E C h0 of UJ .i -O >, E C '+� u O w 3 a U v U a U a '� v v v -q m Ln v +� o _ 0n O U O ro +� ro ro f0 E cc +� v � U ^ O U O t O " 0 t m O m O m t t f0 x O ° t In E w O c p 0 v O O p W E +� U 9_ � H U U U U U +� Q w 0- u H o ._ N ro 0- +� — ro O U ro a) U v L O O _y d o vOid 0 .0 m m 4' Ln Ln C. a R 3 a a En s Z w 0 U Lr Lr m E d D ro ro E v v ofO c �; >, 0 — m ° c L j d m ,° a *' c Fu v c °J O + Q) LO ++� CL C m y m G l V Li V) Q cn E-50 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 308 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 C m O O c a, v v c� Q) a > rn m N v v C a 0- a 0- t v v N O U ~ v ~ v C p L C C C Q Q) Q) Qf Y Q) Qf Y N E E 'u E 'u d E E m E m 6 O O O 0 O u O u L 7N 5 w E O N O O O O CL >� >� ._ O > ._ O a+ C i N i +-' Q i +-' 0- m N m N C O O O E O ~ O O O O O O O a o E E a , E .E EE . u "O O x O x u f6 m u m u m E v E v E CL >. e0 a, a, t C C - O .^� O �n L �n -a -O v o ° E E o o o v C .� 0i +� O v o - pU O N N fx6 L ° O C 00 Q +�.+ �vOi *O' O N O U 00 t E aJ aJ a C E °C° v o o v m E a a, a o o +, ro o 0 Ln .� o °J m 3 3 v o .� o v C o �° o a - a, Q `° a v o E o �°a a c o bf 0 v u '� .v `° O 0 'm m ° t o C *' 3 '} 00 °' 00 v ' o 00 i aEi m o o v 3 v a, ° .fl v m °�' v 'Z�-, > .o v ° E 7 u C m =3Y OJ •i Q) +�+ t N 'O -O m > C L C 7 p -° O N i iJ 00 >� +�+ 0 C i+ --0° •*—' CO m Q N h.0 N N N N m 0 7 a; N C Q ro '� a +� m e0 0 v > C m a '� O -0 : v 00 o m � O 3 ) CO '^ Q .O .E = Ou �°° M o •`° ° 2 :*C--' .° O CC0 m N U° � - > >, m E u N E >, a, = o -0 v .E 0 u a, m a M °� v °Q) m v N i L L O C) = U`� C C 7 -° O C E Op O o •j V L -O E +' C -O O L ri a-+ '° O -° >- v +�-+ .° U O fl'-O C Q fl- of ++ N -O ++ N O � C O N O ° m C m m u v +� +, m +� N dJ 0- m O N E a�0 w N C a� 7 N v) 0 p W of _ u 7 O O) u ++ C C 0 Q) ate-+ N f6 — = O m E "O +•i r,4 u o •u u m N N > +•i N O ate-+ •2 O N fl- C f�6 N N *' ° Q) =~ > L -° O) m `� N �' L N N O C � C O C L -O N — O O C N C m 7 -° O > V m N -° — m m N O W ++ C L 0- a+'+ N o L = f0 t O lD 'O L �n '+J O L >� N C N N d u > u H N m m C -O of m 'i E E T t +' O) O) N u ++ — N "O N ,� ?) > N U "° N O C u +) u E +J u a o v v = ~ v U0 v E N ° v m _ v C .v m O Q = +� 0 v m m C oo �, t •x a +� C — E H C H ~ U m o u ou O Q U u .S U NN m aJ E .s a m o O ou in L O 0 _y Y w L a L d Ln c > Q. Ln a � s 3 a a OU d Lr �D �D m d L d a a a E p m m m E v v v Vf L H C ice+ m o E o Gl V L U Y 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-51 Att A Page 309 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O O O Q Q 0) N U U U Q) O v O v O d > >> N O~ v ~ v ~ v o L C L C L C L C.w v va> v v a> v v a> d a-+ m a-+ m a-+ m L L L i OQ O Q O Q O u O u O u Lm C m C m �n O �n O QJ E O �n Q > .0 O > .2 O > .2 O C O O O Q) 16 En n O O O O O O O O O O O a EE E E E E E . E . E u ou M ou M ou M .0 TE v E IE-Z v E 1E v E CL 00 " o E N *' NO .2 = fN0 O) f�LO C W m O �, 0 M �n +) N m +-+ Q O Q t _ O_ — 'n O C N 0 m 0 00 0J �� 0J O = N m hD +� a N fl C •L a0 0J N �' E h�0 LLI U i > m u "O U L L w C O C C 7 Q OD i 0J ' 0J 0J •in m N C N N .0 m C _ 0 L C "� +� O m Cr O .E — ro 0 +' L � O > N N O f6 •h°-0 I �" N O m 7 v �- m Q Q 0J ~ L m co X - - C: n m O o E =a c 0 m Q p —_ —U D f 6 m fl 16 o _ ) *� O M o _o t DO _ 0J 0J 0J m '� C C +� t Y C T L m U Q— C "O 0 0- Q) C "O m N a-+ ate-+ •0J i > E a s a v o ° °J o f6a " 0 0 = O E Em 3 m O M v m 0J C m N 0J 0J C E 0 +� E C N +J L O m 0 n J N O > i -0 O >O C f+ '� O 0 L +-r- L m °- m C � O L U �n >� �n m Q >� U — Q 0J vi O u m m + + +J O hD +� u 0 +J C O O + C 2 L n +' 0J C 0J d O v m •E Q Q 'Q fl o Q U —vm u - w v Q — N aL+ ° 0J N �' v N -O 'O O E •r, E OD U O Q`� C •� v N Ou N +t-+ E •m OA •� E .> > C N L 0J hD m — 0J hD +�-+ OD — �n m OD �n U > +-+ L °' 0J +0J-+ C Q = m +-+ �n N 0J L +-+ O) of m +� L .0 C vmi C "O C .N C +' '}, u O *' 0J m U v ao _ v o E ° o M a, C m Y o m 0 o m .E a m o E 0 Q N v u o L o a— E Q 3 ° a 0- Q) E m 3 C u ° E v v o N a ° o o aJ °J x a ao 16 x 0 v Ov Q) o — a c E v C O 4(+ *' C 0) X 0J O � 0 C m C 0J - Q — 0- `� — 0 0 OD U m W m -O O 'ma N •f6 +�+ ° W > v m ate+ "' 0J ate+ *' •0 C a v m m 'n '0 •C :+J .0 fC6 +vC ° —° E a, aE J N . C o w C L 0J 0 � p E O >, + w Q "O O vjbFDEO N O mE O ° ' ' O C O Vl 0 = N° Co o EC- O C v ° aoo v v o E > Q) a, ° o a,vn � C E Q' o o ° v 0 ° o m Q v v ° o o v o v o m �' °p +� E -O "a U +-+ 0J N m U +-+ Y 00 U m O L 0 0 Y w L � L d C. CL S 3 a vU d m d L d a a a E p m m m E v v v Vf L r 0J 0J E � > r0 o oa E M o o m a O Qjv E-52 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 310 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N 0) t d +' N O C +' O L C.w d � L w E Q 41 C C w E a o -- u u CL 00 .1 c aJ c ° w O C:c m m +� m N .� �O Q >, O iJ . 0 OC: n M �n Q V O L Q 0J - +' m W O l0 N L m 0J 0 fl- Y (J- v O t a �� w O 0 � c m O a >, U Ou U n aJ C i~ -O .0 vV'i > •m i= � + m O o o •0 Q u Q aJ 00 0J 0J Q) >`tioa p v > E u Y .� m o E m o o v Q Q N U .N > � - - c L c O o O c N c •° C C o a; o c - v E " ° r' 7 +v.+ N C +�.+ Z M .'� = Q *' - E CO 1E f�6 +�.+ m C ate., *' O 0 ' 0- a.., O LL.I °U 0J M '0 'n -O N V i O vl O O0 Q ° �n N m C L 0J —' d U m c m - m > v 3 > v Q) �' U w a v v v v �' v °N° 41 ° Vl Q O m Ln `� ° ^ N *�-' N v v U L -0 0 `•� U N > L 0J >. +' 0J �N Q N ++ L �n O O C 0J c-I C U C 0J m L V w O c v w � m V vCLO �v v fl o M = v �v0 ,N U o >m EY' c tw o o a ° v *� '+6 o o v - O 3 0 V) v ar N N c — +� v = a v 3 '+� O v°J c w u °' 'O 0J V m L C o X •� a a� m E C v ate+ Ln N O0 U C N 00 > 0J V1 0O 0J :� m O ++ 0J 0J Q "° N O L O M ° c-I 0J O �O N l0 > U O OU U -0 M d d c �' U -a Q c-I 7 -O bA_ 4J bA Q N �' m _ A In N c O O Q E m •�n — "O –1- 7 '° a C Fu C io 0 0J C i C = o f c 'x +� c O c v N c ° O v E `2 � E E c E v v o a '- m r ° ro U m v ao a o a a c •0 f6 f6 0 0 c a m t U m 1 () 0 u E cvl o c� c ?� Q v' O cvl v C m Q v o .2 m `�° v v u o v io .2 m o c a; v ��- E o o N v v m U _ n O Q O > O Q O N m m Q •+� Q Q 0 C � n 0J C i Q Q m � 0J 0J Y v O m O E 0J Q N Q 00 0 .E 0 0J Ov Ov T +�-+ '° +0-+ V 0 + N +�-+ +�-+ L 0 0 _y +' w L � L d C. CL 3 y v m Z � – d m 3 L d E ao E Vf L H C ice+ C � w d 7 C CL U a 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-53 Att A Page 311 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O 0) o v N a a O O O > N O ~ v C.w 0J 0 N E -r- . d i O >? O v ++ _ Qj E O C CL > .� O L Q Qj N E CO 0J 0J O a E E u C Eox u u m Q2 E CL 00 > O +, U0 a ° E O 00 +� O v u V) C '� ao a C C �' +' 0 Eo Q N U O O Z m C a n — N O m l0 m = 7 m Ou Y 7 m m y +�.+ L m •� ° �0-, .� N 'L fl- 0J N O .° m m Ln C •0 ° U L C E 0J C O C E Q C o — .° o c � c � v N 0 ° =' v C f6 0 m c� U 'x '� v ° •2 v O m v — w Q E o *' Q) *' E m 0o E C O O v w L Q �, '� " O •, v o _ O 3 O O O •L •�, "O +.+ C 0J O +�.+ O m O +L.+ ° �O 0- 00 O +�.+ m c 7- Q) ci m — C O a Q) O E Q, ,�, _ — O v Z m u -- m v O r a, C a, o C +' Q 7 c-1 N 00 0J 'u .- = — C 'U m N n 0J u C �n Q) L M .2 .>_ Q O V c •C N ~v� m V) .� w O 4; 000 v0i `� O O � O n ar w m y °; v Y v v ° E > O Q) C: cl v a E ° °�° E o +I u o ° > a O C � C `�° o m > f6 ° v O Q) a v 0C: m Cm 0N0 ' �n 0 N C NH Co O E O � 0J 00 m Q M c , 00 7 Q) > uCO C o a vo oCQ) - > Qj CO .V .S X a0 -O 0J vO Q) ami 0- C 00 U Q C d O N Z 0J V) u a flm flv C oO mQ O v Q O OQ O 0 v ' Q) ° ° O + Ocj ~ u .� 0O m u L O O o n o> m OL v a C O 0 C Q O _ o v v v O t 0 HOv ut0 ° Q 0 �e u m0- a0 U L 0 0 Y 3 w L Qj L d Qj C. CL S 3 m E a 0 E v Vf L H C ice+ C d C y Co C L CL o a, z E-54 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 312 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O Q) c o Q) Q) — ~ EQ) E 0 _ CF) A n m u �a U a O "a •� Q) O A +-' U +� Q) m N a t a 0 0) O +J O L C a O -r N N O m o i H Q) C ++ Q) aL-+ O 0 00 i 0- C i O.w + '� Q O 0J N C a ° n E — d N E m O G 0) v m 0 u O U C f6 — Qj C a-' "O O 0 �n Q 7 O m > .� O 41 Ca 0J L Q Qj L Q 0 C O 0J O N >. E •N u O +J E Q) 0 >_ .� V N L E N -- m OU MQ L M L H Ov aL-+ O H v 7 CL O N O O -r- .-L- _ — O +1 - > 0J = m 00 3 = v *' °�° o C _a C m Q) E ° v v o c o Q m a a a o °o •� o 0I0 Q) x C n -0i0 N OU a0 °� +° *' O ° _ +6 x0 LQ L >� 7 a-+ '— 'a 0J C -a Q) m Q) L U C m m m ° U C L VI —O 0i0 N U C >� >� O C U0 nN m ++ W C f+ m a, C:U *' O O o `�° 0 3 °- O E Q J C a aao 'N ° o a, f0 C ;0 +J L aJ aJ C 'N +-' C fU6 ,ten u m Q) C C ° O m +J m �n O d aJ m a m aJt10 t v +° �' + v ` 2 v E v m v O "a L E Q) +-+ — U X 00 ._ O a a, v o v E o v c o m ° - N Q) C � b.0 Q) V O m c °� v v > c Q •O ao v O ° o a s c ` Q) J .0 O C C � 0J �n C 00 O - +J N V) U — - — 0J m 7 c Ua o v .� o U o .N v c aCo o Q c O ' C o ° a `�° ° o v v v Q) o v Q) C: - � > c aJ �' m m O m '+� +� > m f6 Q) — +� Q O Q x m m U n : � C -0 v o o0 0 ,A C > _ 3 0 � ° .� N aCo a, 3 3 ai a, +� m O > H > C 0- w U C O m m O m m Q) m Y U _° ++ m C X U m i N = C 41 i 0 '+� N "a ,� 0J �O +� i t 0J C i O 0J C m 0 m .� QQjj N Q) >� m O U 7 L Q) 0 � — "a N > O aU+ C C }, m O "a -0 N = L Q) E ^ C f�6 i ° 0�0 a f�6 C Q •� f�6 U O O x x •� iE � O +L ?) U V E '� 3 v v c o v a +� E a aCo o v v +� m a v C � v o a _ U ° ir- 0 N °U u Q) N •}C—, L U N O U E • • • �' 00 L '� o m v ° o ° o o v v c Q) ° U ° v v E O 00 00 U — a H m ._ L U U U L L Y — _ -a m U ._ a m L O O _y Y � 0iS L Q. CL S 3 w vU d m E d p m m E v v a Vf L H C �+ � � 0J 7 � i E m U a m O m M O m Gj V U cn 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-55 Att A Page 313 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O Q c °' _ 0) o vv N a Q O O O j N O ~ v C.w v v N E -c . d i O Q O v ++ _ C 41 EO ,n CL 7 .� O L Q Gl N E CO 0' 0' O a E E u c EoX u U M Q2 E CL o0 00 c v a' c °co c O U A° N .N O = o 00 N j CO > f6 O + 0' 0' +� f6 n L .E � � � +.+ E C "O E O0 0' r6 E 0 vCi O N •h0 L E E m N .z' - E > Q r6 ,n O N O0 c L 01 L 0 O 0n X C Qn i �O 00 O O C O �o +J 00 c E Q �, E O E u aco n -0 v c m 'E ax' E °co a c N c Q) o v u = v ao o ° a o � ma c° 0' O -O �p M1 7 f6 L >> f6 }' U 0' O 0' b.0"0 0' *' f6 f6 O Q -2 M1. "O L v v a, v -a m E E v > c .v v +, O 3 c C c - c (6 L - Q) O L Y 0 O ,H — E ° - O M a, E o c o �_ c n3 c a, a = c .E v 0 O ,n v E .'n ,n O0 vii •O0 > O '� .E � ,n +-+ L V '�, C ,n � aJ 3 O a' .� v O w O u O ao u v � o o E N a v a m m o O v o 3 -0 c +� v v v M � O Oa c v o0 0 0 °� c O v ao c v E _ c E v n3 C O E *' u n3C: UO E c a, � E o �' c E m .� m OM '� � o 00 'EA 0 O .E N 0' Q O O u O N 0' c H 1100 u - O c N Y +) N C *' y L C C a O0 n I L O E U c 0' C E m y +� o aco 0o u oo ~ 'u m °) m V V m v a; o f u E v c v 7 v v •c v - N - > c '+� o 3 v v E c ao v u � V U 'O E u � O "a -0 0' O N 0' 0' j .Q O C ,n M1. "a C O O 010 a � c ca ° a °' a o aco ° o > 0 3 E o u 0- E v E v v o v o o 0 O v 'E m Q o v o o v a = °�' z° V) v L 0 0 'n w L w L d o � d d c 3 Q. a a � s 0 w �_ V M E a 0 E v Vf L H r i0+ C � w 3 N c E O 0 Q i CL EA Q, U In E-56 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 314 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O 0) o v N a Q O O O d +L+ L j N O ~ v 0.w v v N E L . d i O Q O v ++ _ C 41 EO �n CL > .� O 41 i Q Gl N 16 E 00 N N O a E E Z) C EoX u U M Q2 E CL 00N C +� � v � ov o N C 0 L O +�+ — >� L Q) ,� E C C - C O o0 —u i 00 >' i i r0 = O O C N — •� 7 `� C 'U C r6 N C� X C w N E 00 N O N a0+ 'O Q C —O i 0�0 E G v n3 v Q) E v v u V '^ � v v >• f6 0�0 LY N v v O ++ f6 > +L-+ = f6 N N m N m C E Qj 7 CO C V v aL0-+ •O N L C -a 'O - - 0 C CO M N C O> d Q) Qo a� v °' va N O E o c rn o o c o N V L E 3 0 d •� a '� C N ao m f6 Ln C L c-I aO+ O O N i Y E O Y N — T O > N rq L O .. L f6 Ln Ql N M N = >' N pp C i m G N +-+ O OA +-+ M O N Y H m 00 N 00 > C 0 a y E -o 3 +� �' O +� ri > u = L`0 00 c o E U a c Z o U m o - - m w o O Ln E o r' .0 � v O u O -0 Q 'v U fC6 O a u C N O-i v O 'O C -p J r6 N O 7 C w O = C r6 '^ E .0 = J fY6 L N L0 r6 O O r6 C m � "O O Y m O F O -O a+ .N .E O O -0 C L6 -w Vf = n m m � m � .E '0 C H rq 0 f0 _ i 0 3 N 00 i C i 'o C 7 00 U L N �n N v . N N r6 'O Gl rq '^ 0 Q O ai c M C N ) r6 c C O O "O n = N — r6 E Y "0 i 7 L Y •+�+ ,N O L C 0'L N -O L m bn L L C �n L �n N C O N H Y LO C = U +' f0 C �n ,� C N N J Gl f6 Y f6 Ln '0 "0_ c V1 c C Ql 41 E i 0 = Q C C a+ f0 m L N m C � ` C N �n C O O O f6 c-I E v *' c Y E o v o c v o_ c Y +' > v m L0 - o ++ _ i+ J E E °' °' L0 E - c m - `° 00 0 C o- C � _ u U N C m _ f6 u L U N L f0 41 O >, •f6 N ++ ate-+ a-+ N N O ate-+ Q L u 'i f6 = O E — >� — O U m 0- v L0 v c c n3 v o v m E m O t0 c 3 y c E v E n3 f6 C m •C 0 N ++ O C = v 0 0 X N L O N O O m O O i O N C N �0 E 00 _ ._ O U ._ -Fu -r- O U v -0 3 � v OC u ar v O v a LL 0- U L O O Y 3 w L Qj L d o d 0 .0 C Q. a a � s 3 0 L`0 E a 0 E v H L H C ��.. C � 41 3 N C E U O CL 0 Q > 0 a U Ln 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-$7 Att A Page 315 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O O O Q Q Q 0) S f6 f6 f6 N U U U fl- a) v O v O v O d > > > N O ~ v ~ v ~ v CL a) v v v v v v E E E i OQ O Q O Q O U O U O U L 5 f6 5 f6 5 f6 wE O �n O n O �n Q > .� O > .� O > .2 O C 0r6 n O O r6 n w a O O O O O O O O O O O a E E E E E E .E E . E . u ou M ou M ou M 7 v E TE v E v E CL 00 v 00 N .� C N v 7 +� N O E m '° O Q v O O c O a Mv o N v > O - o ° E o a ao Q) v r o om E :+� o a) c v r0 3 - v v m -0 3 _ -0 o v c o m > m y 3 +� � -' v o v O m 3 m °� 3 -0 •N ago 7 +-+ +-+ O -O 'U `� -O N f6 r — N Q — O N N O N C � � O � � u °' v m v 0 m v v v -0 c H +� ° N v c O +, c a s v 5 0 -0 � o v U M v c v v - o C0 U f6 = f6 F N f6 L f6 7 ��., f6 N Q •+-' f6 •� f6 f6 C 0 f6 V0 v -0 c v v a°o � ° o v m > = Q a 0- v E 3 0 0 0 W v o O 3 E m e c :� v O - O v � m = o a O U 3 O - -0 O .E v v ° 3 = 0 - E _ v v +� u ° C o ao ° t >, m u Q) v v Y v vE . m v a N QE m ° o o °c O u E -0Q) O v -0 rd ov O v vo ° °o ° E0 Q) O c o N2 X - .o m > 0 c O O o v c v � u m u v v � E = a •� u a O - o c v - v v E o a c m E °� .E m aoo v v in a v o 3 o Q m f6 a Z v L O O _y +' 3 w L d L 0 0 O O d C. E O CL t 7 p m a L a Q Q Q E ro ro ro E v v v Vf L H r �+ C w ° C > d r O o E _ M o V Q U w E-58 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 316 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O O O Q) Q C v = °J = °J d 7 = 7 = 7 = N O ro U U U m U Q fl- -a U Q U U U C U O m 00 NU U U Q v C O O O O O U O i � U ate-+ U U U f6 N N O ~ v ~ v ~ v t 'O L C +J 4-+ "O 4-+ "O 4-+ "O H U �n 0 L C L C L C L C CLw 0 0 0 0 0 0 C _ E E E > C C C O O O O UOUO U O U O U •O O O w E OC O Ca .0 O 2 vO >' 0 ° Q — Q • Q ° u C O O M L(OC6 O O N "O "a "a > E CO N U CO N U CO N N N E a E EE o uOux Ou mu v H v E H v E v E 5) E CL CO U L E N c-I X U aU+ Q) vi +� N O m N C C >• C L ° O U -0 N C O v� •O00 t +� L -a LL C > L *' C: Q v U 7 t0 i vOi vi •O Op vi N O Q� U +� m ° U .> E _ UJ m O +J iz Q m L U a-+ N L U O U — U 'n N U Q U O +.+ > �n +.+ 7 Q) O L C L ++ O Q) °- c ro o 71 O O C v m Q O v "O ,� v' n O ° +� Q- m E F � a n, +, C v 3 o U Q- �o x 00 > O° o v v° o °o> uc ° oo Q° uc a O C> v C Q) u OA 0 O N .E r6 a -O Q C > N ° E +�.+ lD L O L ++ +' O U +� _ 'pp L c C L E n C O E t v v C L U L C C N v O O 0 f6 E — O 6- U O L O •° O Co N N +' C E 'a L 0 C N O v *' t > U j v a0 v N ° f6 C v •p O Q N •O L +-+ Up > U -a C to Gl 110 -a l0 v m N :� +-+ N Ln S1 Qj r3 •0 O '� C ;� a.., f0 t]p ° 7 •N C O C Q ° "O "O N +�-' •'� C O Q,i i C '� (J "O ° i -a C U BUJ C L +� L N ° E > •0 u n C L a v L 3 ° v 'v o L E ao m O O ao a O z > N a - u " v u a .0 O v m f0 'x v Y U ° L +� a O 3 Q v n a v C v H °�° m C v ° +� _ n v - ro C LO a U OU � C � O Q °U m v - UUO 0- � E a � Y o c .E v U M > v •° E Z o o v -0 o m •X O L +: � - � 0 3 o C v 0 Ea C �, m v a a- 4 - N v 3 w c v M 0 ro u ro °�° _ t o 0 0 .� -a c E ° � o c v � m .� j ° � °° � � � Ua � _C � C � � E � � � � u m - 0 v LL L L S C L U o '> N *' ° ° ° E a m — Q O L a o m U L o v o a = a 3 0r x ._ o +� L O O _y Y Co L H 'L d O O O d E Q Q Q CL S 7 Y V V d m d L d Q Q Q E D E v v v Vf L H r d v E =3 c E > v M C v -aa EA V m °LL'00 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-59 Att A Page 317 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N N t d +' N O C +J O L C.w d � L w E Q 41 C C w E a o -- u u M v v DO U > -O hp > 0 tCo NO � tl — vi O (� O 00 O UJ .0 C UJ 0 O UJ O O UJ UJ w +� C U M 0 > O N O C v v O 'O ,� O L r0 +� L1 L L .� C v t0 C '^ v O L � Q O U Q v L � Pv Vf UU 0 U O Q 6 O O UJ +� '^ O •C >' T ro ° rL u +� Q ° N U `� • O v 'O O C v L H 0 O ° U00 O O 1 . E m M up Oi O v M v +� v v a E v a L —cr- U UJ O U 0 r0 +� 'O +'' UJ t _ of L f a.., Y Q v _ N -O "O LO Y O 'O r0 = - ° 7 O O +' H t •U iJ h0 r0 •� f0 Cru C t. o C _ ° ._ L C u E o T u C U L L U .L v r6 C — ro ro v� aJ ro �' L v� aJ v v 0 O u E O L E O v +� .0 hT0 UJ U UJ Ou U -aW Q NN C U U C 0 'O Q' UJ N N OA E Q L U T •� C O O O C v(10 U O r- Lo C: w u v v O Y O O '� t Q U C O -O Q t t• hp UJ 0- w vii i r0 — 7 LO 0m i N m 0 U U r0 C }, — O O L V v X — rup C UJ t]p +0., Q ° ° -O L r0 t Q O Q — r0 C U U l0 •v>—i v Q 7 'C U UXJ .� x 7 N u O U v vUi v Q O "a i ro - +� ro C .� L +� > v O E v C L Q) Q) v .� -0 o 'x v N E 00 o U a a L ? m a Q ° u1 O Q v ° v N .0 C NO Q u rru t v +; v U C v ro rn v rCo � E -O ro UJ O UJ u M N 0 UJ rLo •C ro v U +, UJ Y r0 u t O W M C v� C E �0 -O Q O C O W L v , U -a C C LO N C v eC0 +� U p u1 'L f0 +� O v C ° .T O rTo '*' ro O •� ro v ° LO C +, v� C ro UJ U C v — O X 'O 2 v '^ i U i UJ -p rLo -9 — 0 +� O — m C CL-0 UJ v ' r6 N p C _ roLO u C O U fL0 UJ v t v L U ��if +�+ L i +�+ '}, iJ U O U t U>J -O Ln E f6 UJ '^ -O U �h0 0 i = UJ a Q�0 j Q O v 'O Q- UJ O- v 0 v N E t ro v C > — L C +� v O t E ro ro ro UJ UJ t 0 O L > 0 E +� L U U ._ v t Q L r J H U U ._ o U E +� LL o H +� E t 0- +� ° u L O O � L d C. M M y v V Z 0C — d m i d E ao E Vf L H r ice+ C � Gl d 7 C CL U a E-60 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 318 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O O Q 0) N U U a fl- a fl- Q) O v O d > > N O ~ v ~ v O c c c c CL Q) Q) Q) Q Q) Q E E E E i O O O O G O U O U .L wE O O O �n O �n Q 7 >, >, >, .0 O >, .0 O N N C Q) Q Q Q Q m 0 0 o a EE E u o 'x o 'x u U M U M H H 1E v E H v E CL +J +J C L N L f0 O v v = C ro �O 4� N v O O N c v E Q C � 0 = O O � C O N O 00' = v v v O — v 0 0 0 +� •_^ f0 0 O 'C C N O C n L — L = E 'M ro O O N '^ Q t v '^ O O d L O 0 d •> to O c u a) m —0 � c Lo 0 0 ro � 4' 'i v C N E Q U E N Q Q O 'U 3c- u +L+ N 'O U t Q N M •�, — •— +.+ UJ O UJ UJ -O v t0 pp L f6 O O C O_ L N f6 -0 U N N O L C U i .� Q N 4� O X UJ O "O E -O v O "O 7 N > L C L >� - .� O M Ln .S N 0 t i v T c U v v > i O > C (6 O t0 N C f6 > v a ro +� U v o v ULO 3 +' C U c Gl d u v f6 'U ro O Q � +� T Y T U Q "O C L '� +' L E Q r6 > ,� E O U v 0 m 0 +' - c 7 +� O c v C 0 0 U c m 0 -0 O on U ui +, c '+, a s t f0 v v v '+� u > O ao O 0 O O N U o C O c = 0 C +� +� v O v v X 0 ++ L C v) v_f O U O L 0 0 U o v E -a u O � m -0 f0 � 0 0 "' U �_ E E U 0 c L L A O U v - , -0 � T w o N 0 C O O O c ._ v ° U 0 " E > v E *' o E E c o E °' 0 > o E vUi M N E C N ) ro L '0 c p Y O +' pp to 41 O U , ro f6 L f6 N 7 .� •° .N > 0 +m+ 0 0" -O � U t C > = c C > L N N U E v Q) 'o 0 .0 w a .� o v o v ,, o �o •U 4 '— o M 0 (u a4 . o •EA U Op U O �n N j N t Q •+ v C N N Q i 'L v C — �, v +-+ C t .c 0 >• d ro C -O -O -O -O f6 f6 C 0 0 C > C = N N O ++ U a..i v U C C v U 0 i' C Q W ++ Q v •+•i 0 O C 4�A-Z E v E m v c 3 v m ° '— c c t +� c t +� c c o GU O C O i N O H O +� E c E O UJ O O vO N U C +V+ O C v a •• U 0 o U U 'c E o E E U E E +� O U M o v f6 L - +U+ +� N E L 0 E — v N i v v O .� C O v E 'V1 N O Q' f6 C UJ ULA E > cif +-+ X +-+ O -O 7 L t O M UJ UJ 'i UJ i v v O L O > O O (6 .*' C O E O — N L U m w N Q of of U i +.� i of U i•' U > U +� of UJ U L O 0 _y +' 3 w L d i d O O O O • ' E Q Q Q Q � M 7 m a L a Q Q Q Q E ro ro ro ro E U U U U Vf L H C N � 0O L L CE V) 0 ca ca CL O ro ro a V o E 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-61 Att A Page 319 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O m v 00 v O O O > r6 u a v v v 'E v > u ° o � = u 'O V V V 0) .L N ate-+ O C C C O O C O C O U U U N (J v C u 0 4 0 4 0 4 N O ~ C n v r6 H N H N H N C L M '� UO O UO 4-; 4-+ "O 4-+ "O O O.w N N N N N > N N > N N > E � � L+YC =u E L+Y u=M E L+Y U E E E E E O O O O L ,OvEv - Ou Ou Ou •O O — OQJ E N n O O OC m C C O O +J a0tio- N 00 O O O O f6 f6 '� ,� N f0 O .� *L'' L O N C O 0N N CO N N CO N N E a > _ v u a a w >, > E .N >, E N >, E N O -- c v E 'Q a E E - E E - E E u C a O O C C C O x C O x C O x O c m m m m `-' C: Q) O � TE v E TE v E TE v E - m -0 - v) 0 — S- C f6 fC6 0 N .O L 3 C i L f6 >� 7 N D- Q) -O DO O f6 N - O ++ O L N W f6 C f6 L >? Q) N C C: vO t c M y v a E to 0_ v m O E c 3 W °� o c v o ° ) o oo u E E c w m u o f6 � c v E O o aJ a E 3a o t3 +, v C ^o N v v a m a O °' `� v C m >� O aO+ O L •� L N O C -a 7 O O vi m = v m O c i+ +L 0 0 n = 3 c u 3 v N O n 0 C O O v N _ °p N *' t u U n - — "O C N +' O OU ++ J L "a 2 N N ++ N f6 C L E N > 7 N C l0 'n "O f6 N .fl- - C O +, M L t10 Y _O E L N N O m C .� L i p C — N N >� N J m L O O +' +r C M a, +, .N a O o v +, Q O �, E _ �' oo O v v E c O o ro N c 3 v v t3 m o °J C�7 a °� v = v v E v c v O ro c C O 0) E 3 Q) -C -0 >, L V +� z o m .v E > c m O .� fl o rn O Q) v v o ° m � - Q) O 'N oo v v m m C u v v 3 v °; f6a v w v c v c 3 O E +� v v o M + v o E a c ar o o O v a c O c c 3 C �o v v O v a a v v v o _ v v' " v o v �° ° tico E �' n cn v oo v o .� E a, o f o °; ao u `° O •> °' E aCo 0 o a a N � *' 0 v o 0 r C) o e4 r- E2 E v v o o _ c v E o -°O c f6 c -0 O y v v N •�, >? O L L > O C •N C >? C f6 N m v > C f6 C f6 >? E c > aJ c E > u a a �' M E O v c v v N a �, O u C m E > o .c O c c a; c > O - •0 � o o c u v O +� C t - m u O m O Q) c m = �' oo u •� O O E c u aJ f0 a c E v E v u > v �, v O a; c a v v ao °c° o f +� v E c E m u aco v m v v v 3 v aco > o Y m E E m `E ao o E 3 v Y m a o v u 3 Y o L O O _y +' 3 w L d i d O O O O O O dCL CL t 7 i i i i i Q) to ♦1 L a >? >? >? >? >? E ro ro ro ro ro E v v v v v Vl L H r ��.. C N vl E N m u O ro C E m N O C C r6 CL o v E > Gl V m D Y cn E-62 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 Att A Page 320 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O O Q 0) N U U a fl- a fl- Q) O v O d > > N O ~ v ~ v Q. N N Q) N ate+ d +� U — U E E i O Q O Q O uO u .L 0 C M � M w E O n O n Q 7 .� O .� O C O O w E tm O O O O O O O O a EE E E E . E ou m oU M Q2 E v E CL 00 O - v n o v N c 3 o v v o c 3 o v c c v 00 o a v v o vao m ° n O u v 3 E a ° ) E a v 3 E a Y o > ' '° o v =6 0 o .� O m 3 c v o 0�.' _ o O c Q) f6 00 o v 3 o c • f6 E o v f6 o v 3 v E O C: v °- v :+� o f ° f6 0- a°Jo -0 E � v ° v :+� o E 0 c E °� � 00 v a; 3 �, v E O O - v a0 0 .� v a; 3 �, v E 0J v o o c c C c o '� ° m 0 c -0a o o = c u o '� m O N -a a ac0 0 3 a Op +N.+ 00 "O i N .fl- C a Op +v.+ 00 f6 �' �n L 00 O L E .2 3 O C n N J -0 O O +J CJ O 3 O O C Op Q) u c aCo M v IE5 C --a v v � N �j > u E � °c° v v C O v o .� v c v ` � = v `-° > v O .� v ' c v - v E o0 •L V >_ +' C -O •C o ,� f6 -a L _ N +� > C +J C -O •c o O C' •V +�-+ v `0 v o -ao ° C: b.0 v av v E a o v° c N o 0 v H N C v f6 f6 'a U Q O �n "a N fl- O O N C v f6 f6 'a U O = i f6 .^� E .O a+ C OU V N N v 7 Q C +�+ L f6 L ++ -0 O C OU U N N v 7 Q Q L N o- F0 in w oa � o v .E `+`° v v c m o O `° E N f6a c v o E Ln O 3 E 0 v O v c o v o •� 0 3 E o � v v t m a) -a X E Op 'L = v V N L a� C C C �) f6 Q pp L - v V N_ = L L C W rz Q) v v Q p .E c a u vao v bD � � - v c v a .E o 'm H m O }' S O N ro 'C t vCi C CO .� Y *' O > O , C .0 v v O O E c .E m a v - .� .E .E c .E a E - +� o E o0 00 L 0 0 Y � 0iS L d L O O C Q. Q Q W M 7 41 V V t`0 E d D r0 r0 E v v Vf L b.0 H L N C N '- E o °a o a V Q 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-63 Att A Page 321 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O O Q 0) N U U a fl- a fl- Q) O a, O d > > N O ~ aJ ~ aJ Q. N N Q) N ate+ d +� U — U E E i O Q O Q O u u O u .L wE O n O n Q 7 >, .� O >, .� O w 16 E O O O O O O O O a EE E E E . E oU M oU M Q2 E v E CL 0 Q, O • CO NL m - O ' > N O Q) O -r C N N E O c 0v .ava ao aJi 0 > m00 O 00 0 ° C m `° _ v n E o v -0 v N O v E o v °�' v 0 x U m E o0 v Y v v E O v v m O a, - 3 Y O m E Q0 0- ) o � m - v �J m +� U v E o m — a L m C 7 L +� "O -O L O O +� i � — N O C 7 -a .� J '^ L 00 N on E m a '> v o0 v v Fu N U > m v E u °�_° m a, ° v N -a Vm v •Q n >, 2 v � - > O .� aJ C O �n m v c m ° v •E .E W a ao + o v o E a ° a C o a; tao o v U ° U° m > - a a c m v U m O' E � a O v � � ° — � � E m a, 0- '0 oo m } ° N ° i cn v 00 iJ O + ._ N -° w �° >� N N ° i cn N Op L C C a� m E tioN m N .++ O C m ° V d m v N ate+ O u � a 0 =a a, a 0 0 6 C v m C m ° u Q 0 =a O m u C - +' m +� - J anl c NC °o C o u aaJ .aJ C aJ ° ° av � � v �v v o Ev ° a � °c° •°E x u a, O v E r � C °' Q) u ° o > m o m � UQ v aE 00 O m Op+ + a Q E c 3 Y - .� .E .E c .E m a °� .3 E � 3 Y ou o =a 3 v L 0 0 +' 3 w L Qj H L' O O d E Q Q M M 7 QJ V V zM N N m a Q Q E d 0 m m E v v Vf L H C ��.. > UO Q) O C z Q) 0 16c M m EA V = 0 E-64 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 322 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O 0) o v N a a O O O j N O ~ v C.w v v N E -r- d i O Q O v ++ _ QJ E O C CL 7 .� O L Q Gl N E 0O N N O a E E u c EoX u u m .0 � v E CL o o v v N °' m = o °�' o o v N O N N N = O •� 00 O +� O >. .5 E u r- Q v v m +' m 0 = o v n O o v v a c 3 z `-° E 00 v m ° o a ° °� c o Y .E °' m E ° �°' a '} 7 -0 -a o v v; v m v v o v °J o U L v av °�' E -a a •- - a - a ooh � v a C t. o '5 O •Z O E ao O `°3: E o v E a Op 0 �O c c v O LC •O O .*' OCO EO C "O L =3 >- N _5 O O v .O 3 �O N C V O .- � m E vi O u Q) 0O 2 N � O '� N v ��- v °) i c E C °c° a 3 v v - Q; o = - O v ._ c a O O c tjo �, +� v a v �, c o U o v om Q) a aio v o o ai m au °' E a o -0 o mv - c c �, > v Q O C m O u ,� m a N m y 3 Q) C: o u o +° n v v ° Oa v a o o ai v c +� u v v v Q i n fl o u n c m +� o c 0 u v v v C 0 •00 v E v E ) > v v c � � o O 0 c a c > f6 v t - ° t U v bD M v C N O > O t t '� t t O N N tto U > m Y ate., o o j 0 E " u m a +, E H H m LL a) tt 2 - 3 Y u - .� .E .E C .E m Q n L O 0 _y o C Q. a a � s 3 0 m E a 0 E v Vf L H C ice+ w > d C 7 C + 0 m a V Q Q 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-65 Att A Page 323 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c � c� N a ° Q 0) .� 0 N N > E M N O w C +J �; O O L C: C.w Q) M Q) E uO o u N O i N w E O CL .� C N �O O O) E O O t E a Q) u 0 � u n3 C Q L O fl H u m 7 CL 00 OCO �O v N QJ +-+ C L +' p 0 t6 Z5 p O O 'U = Q Q -O `� Q) U0 L u Q �,0 t C U u -Q ,�, Q Op "O Op Q) EZ5 C N QJ .0 a � Q� z Q�Ei Q O •u -r3 Q p Q L .'n V Op Q) 00 C C Q n QS n , tiz Qj Z5 13 + n 3: u r6 — i Lf6 E .� O QJ C QJ �, C .� ° C C m L Q) � Op QJ .Q U Q) QJ m C °U "O QJ QSJ ,Q C 'V �_ ,� QJ f6 N i f�6 L ° O 4 Q: O O L O � N 'Q) t "O C E U O i '�" O O C � +-' C Q) C Q 3 - oa Q) " .c ° QQ, Qs s ° v a u u �, a, o o a, Q) ° E u +� +, 3: tnQ O +, ° V E o m w c n u u c > ° 0 Q) n v Z) Q) M1. 6 n v n, c n Qs v Q) o 0 o v O o c Sao E s Q c *' m O . Q u - m +� C O � +� 0 3 .c v � o Q, c C E n Z5 ° v c *' °� C O o o 0 v ° 7 � Q, o Q) }�- a o c z ° - v o v c v u v a s ° Q ° C °o ns a c o m Z E a •>_ -0 a . m Q Q o E , . O a E � ooM1. o E v r Z5 a E ni i t Q) 0 EE � � vi m Q .00 +' ° 01 O Q O a-� N L i0 L 'i Q. = O C "O O U .E O Q� •� r_ LL ° .a .0 "O "O �, Q� C "a •L Q) L C C C m n a Q.t u � L EO -Q .� Q) t Q C QJ QJ f�6 t O W Q. O Qr o c 'o E �, �, = Z5 m Q) L �, Q X O C C L E J E } . 0 3 u Q u o Q. _ .- o Q. LL Q a, u m m L O O CoY w L- L- i d d d J3 Q. a a � M 3 0 a n V m E a 0 E v Vf L H r ��.. C � d H O Cv Q C O a V 0r E-66 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 324 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O 0) o my N a Q O O O > N O ~ v C.w v v N E -r- . d i O Q O v ++ _ C QJE O �n CL 7 .� O 41 i Q Gl N E 0O 0 0 O a E E u c EoX u U M Q2 E CL Q) 00 00 C 000 a S C 00 a N o u E v o f6 v c O L ° r6 v f6° o Q 0- N v N V 0 L O O +� ° O *� O ii Q) c U v 3 000 a — > v > v o v U O 3 3 v f6 U c 'C m y f6 0 E v E 3 f6 v °� a 00 3 v v C .0 a0 v o v m +� ° > o N 3 Sao 0 ar ro c > LL °� E v O _ c ° i N N "O -0 0 0 O M 00 L .O Q O N 0 O r6 O +�+ L �n O Q Cf+ rU6 O 0 7 r_°6 �n `� r>6 L �' •L N O X110 N N V "O r6 > C 7 C OU 7 o N E v -0a - N N o `° o m v �_ Q) —=3 E ) v c E o L o 3 0 v ai m e o -0 � >, 00 ° v O m v - v v ., E ro N N o '� " E H = v iT C '0 w 00 a ,� a v W ON W C Q 0p +�-+ v j O h0 N 'v N � •+�_-+ Q +�-+ i — O •c No v .� ro ° E o v v Q c *' 0a t ° — c N t o � 0 N m � N N m 00 N = U , " v '� N O '� mc N — N O -t3 a_- N u = :O .2 O E C: "° rp '� C 0 "O i� 4J ++ U OL M 0 � 0 C � 0 -r O N O "O � � v O 0 0 -O � 'N > N ++ � -° O -O 0 � r 0 "O ++ V1 U 7 > >- m 4J Q H 0p 0 ._ C *' 0 0 `� 00 -0 C ate+ _ 0 +' 0 0 C L r6 N V1 y0 L N C > v — f6 L +c L r6 N O V 7 L O N QJ L + r6 OU u E o > v ° m E > E .° w .2 v .2 m rv. f6 v ' '� ° c v v L0 -a E m (D o w z Y ° °� o -0 Q E = a.0 E -00 0 m v v a w 3 L 0 0 o c Q. a a � M 3 0 a n V m E a 0 E U Vf L H r ice+ C � d H 0 Cv Q C ° a V 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-67 Att A Page 325 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 0 Q c °' _ 0) o v N a Q O O O > N O ~ v C.w v v �> N E -r- . d i O Q O v + _ Gl E O C CL 7 .� O L Q Gl N E CO N N O a E E u C EoX u U M Q2 E CL o v 00 G v m N C - ° o v °J �' 00 m a v v � C C m u C N i C C L E N N O N +' `� O '}, 0 7 L C L 0 L x N C N ~ E W >' m "O O M "O *' M1 +�'C Q `�° ! v °�-0 v a o0 0 o v v E > U �_ Q _ f6 0 ~ > N 2 f6 u N V1 > 7 00 N L V1 > L O N f6 f6 N O - 00 00 v E z a � c *' °' N Y a0 v �' •*' E v n0 Uate-+ f6 U N f6 00 O ate-+ j >, — N ,C UO +�+ f6 C �n fl' N "O f6 0 +�+ •0 f6 N N C M C `� L M f�6 N Op ++ L c N N v Q-0 0 N N EuQ) N 0 YE Q) O > v Y f6 C p 7 L O h0 '+J `� c-I .0 N N >� N 0O C N O Q) 2 y C U iE r6 N -O +-+ r6 — U V E X N E U N =� .'^ hC0 ; W .— W LU 00 W O 0 7 O �, C 0 L U -p 0 m O U v 0 N = C C N N O C Vl Z ++ C N C 0 7 G ,� v fl- E "0 0 O 'x v C *' v O O 0 aC0 u 0 >` c0 O O ro �n C N C �n 0-= O O +-+ C G N N v f6 O f6 Q N *' L +' ++ C 7 .� ++ E •— L C ++ •E L m L U N M C : aC�-+ O 0 O +�.+ — 7 .`-° f�6 _ 7 L — Ltio r_ C a"'' O U O0 0 0 2 L •> ate-+ U ++ Qr r6 0 CO a +.+ U +.+ +.+ t o0 N 0 C — +-� 0 t a O E � o 0 m v ° v -6 v N +, °�° 0 3 0 ajo o v v v o a •� 0 } ai a v 0 v • , > v v v •� +� .� C - C > v v u v0i C v0i C +�-+ v0i v O •C -Fu --2 v V U N N N � �h0 Z U C L -a 7 N f6 0 m .o o v v o C iE 3 v o v o m E v E v 3 _ C ._ +� o Z 3 H m U cn v H ri C C c i +� U - - L 0 0 o C Q. a a � s 3 0 Z � m E a 0 E U Vf L H C ice+ C � d H 0 3 v -0 Q C 0 E-68 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 326 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 o.0 C N Q) o � v O) O 0 +J o v N v o a� Q, •u E N O O u C L O O0 � v CL N N N N to E �_ v N Q E d E ` "O v v E N Ou E .^ O O O w E O O N E O O Q C i 0tio i O N C C O O N O E � u m f0 O m m O +J a O C: N > O m Q 0 u u c v m u v v = m t +' UO 0 t H O +J U H 7 CL O Op > N _ O O �n -0 Q) h0 O O N 000 i -° m -0 n +J }' N n _ C Op 110 00 tio O p E h0 u -° O Q O + H m m Lu U +m C L m Qj E '° O +� � N O w C C ?� h0 Op ° i > C O N fl- L v C h0 O E "O '� Y O > vi m o m ° ° u ao n Q) .� v c E e U — N — .° L N N m C m hD .0 N > ate-+ d .'� N N O 0o v v v *' v 3 b.0ao `+° *' ° v c U ~ >° O O ° m r° mac- _ Q °�° r° c E v m - c v v > ao m a *' v c .- ° '� .v b in E - C t. +6 v - v c ao a - o v m °�° = v E > w m v m C a0 Q O � mm vl v ° x d - ao c o f > E o .� E v co: c N o `-° °' E L E '� o _ v = o v 3 0 '� o cn ° a c 0 0 C 0 x E E E v o E � o v �° o o v E °�' E Q) ao o ) v ° = o = .v o .- a •� v° o v u `° m c o o v E moo J a � v Lo a; v a I v a m °� °c° m y v E E w a MO c C o 0 3 �' 3 0 v .E Z ao v c ca C •° •'� •f6 ++ Q) L "O N h0 N 0 O `� m C •� -0 > h0 -a N m G > vi m v 3 v � LIOv � v m c v �' o c v > c o E E o - O - c m H a 3 H O +� m Q 3 ._ cn U w 3 v w H m 0 L O O _y 'n w L Qj H LO O d rLn Q. Q Q CL w t 7 0 m E d 0 m m E v v Vf L H r ��.. C � E N E O O 00 v o0 0 H C 0 N O a V m o m 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-69 Att A Page 327 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 C V1 U °u Lu N �; v n f6 f6 it M CO +�+ 0 N i b. o- > 0) — - C d —O V i 1 Q SC Q Q) O m C C N L C �n U r_ Ln O a -Fu v C �n O >, L .� Ln N vii N C E N w O N N > 0 N Q) O t N i N a, v L O ° C Q +' N N L N f6 N O ~ "a O O N C 7 H Q 0 L C f6 > C E n C + fL6 0.w N C ° E n O C +O-+ 0 N > n N N E C f6 w ho O U O �n -0 N L d E .2 v vi C u o u ° EL i O vii N '� �n O N ° m N > E u O L E -0 N M ate-+ n Q aN+ L L a-+ N L 7 f6 a-+ m w m Q N nQj �n L L + O. j °j, �n (6 >, O L -0 +O+ ate'' a0'' tw >' +�-' a v O v v E -o v u a m O CO -O n n O "O N O un "O O d c > v u z ° n -0 N v u C N N "O C O � �n N C f6 N +C-+ w u O °� ° E n E ro > L 73 H ao v E Q *'4 m }' a CL o0 00 C >� C U V1 N n N O o Q) m O •0 +-+ ° N m N .E ,0 "C f6 ate+ n t N L f6 v > -° N C -O f6 ro ro C Q) w 'n ro CC0-O O m >' L u ro >, +� L .E O0 U O C ro '� O v vOi a c c ° w ? (7 E E c � v v o o c C o z ;6 .� E •E a Q) -0 o U > o Q) O v +� O C +� ao +� c 110 H f6 Q C U L •> O O N N N oho E '� ° q `i - E f6 v o- � �, Q) v c °° do > v C v 0 � C O _ C o � L - — f6 °c° C � � > � � v � E o 00 C f6 — O u ° _ �, L — L '° ° L ai n Q) u � v — a0 C v v O C m C v v ao C t. c u ? v° m v `° °' o N °' m v a Q") E v E > - v .� °' v > N C C L J to f6 f6 O > a-+ C f6 'L C f6 �n ° +' ?) U ++ '� IE U N d ° "° O f6 C U L + .� E 7 .� N + C Q C C C f6 C + N h0 L E L N fl- Y m N — E N N ro "O O Q O — O .° O vi fl- j, �, N O OCO C N 0 O _ p X 4 1 N N Q N "O >� v00�' N Uh0 f��6 S C O N `� O_ N E Q N > N "O . OU O f6 L� OU +�.+ C "C C C N �' O f6 •E ++ 110 m U0 E v v v U v W v v —S N Q) °e v � c*n E - Y L � o C o v ago � � � —u O o ao .0 a> N o> vv av ' a cvcv .ov M o c c o _ wL v o ov ° ` ° c: 6 Eb.0 a+ ++ O O N C ++ L C U f6 U f6 N O N C ON N H N N f6 E f6 Q .� -° N C O L fL6 +�-+ Ln +' N v Q C *' O vtaoii N "° vi 'n N N N D C C C +�-+ ca E E h0 +� > OCO _ >� Op .� U N v E vO '+J f6 > ?) O > N > ° N '� G O O O a° .N a m v v a�_o a�_o o °° m m N v `° v .� � m v n u o 0 m w v � o u E a ° E o v v v ao E v �°J a > ° u ° +� C a M > m U v C — > v v O v O — E Fu v — E f6 U N C O O O N C C C +-+ L f6 +, -O C N L L = L M O C L 7 7 Q ._ ro +� a u w > Q 5 ._ v m v H t ro ro w H Q H v Q t u ro H C L O O _y +' 3 w L d L O O O C ' E .Q Q Q EA S 7 p Y V V m a L IL 0- Q Q E D m E v v v Vf L H C ��.. C � 41 d H N m N m N O CL 0M ° M ° M ° N O N O N O EA V m Co Co E-70 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 328 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 00 � > O f0 L v C °U (�0 "O j, j O !2 ate+ N , m 0 N v 7 Cf +�.+ �' O O +J E — C m ry U 00 Ln C U m t "O 0 •� m Q v 0 O N N "a �n E 0 -an N i C m a) u1.Q) E vOr- Q) Ln ++ �n v m h0 N vCi N 7 Ql I a 0 3 E N N ~ n E > a-+ C ° o •E O E vNi m •0 CO - E m O o N u-a ° E 0 0 .� o v ° Q v N O N N i~ Dp ,— E N E i U C •QJ E O N i v > u O 7 0 N CL a+ C O i u C +J Dp N +-' N O w tmQ) E c Do °C° a a •- M n C = a a E I E W C: 60c� U 7 •N L U C d ate-+ CO C v d m N 00 C z +�.+ +�.+ O u a u tio 0 0- C m O m m m "a m L a-+ O Dp m U N 7 Q 00-i o > E a `-�° - ° C aao o c o °a E o O v C m O - m O a, C ° a N ° aao a, - -a +� U m a _ >, O C E a o C E E r 0 000 °po m o 0 - -°`a ao �' fl 3 '� E �a0 w w m > �_ m m 0 0 v u a C a > v - v m °0 v f 6 N O m m > a m a ) � a ° O E E v ao E E O ° v C o aao a .Q E J a ° ', *' •° x a ° C o a°o _"-' v 0- N m o O v N m n +� N � u 0- m C Q �' Q ao ° t om a O a, u v m y u ° o •c E m � ° a, C c t. - m -a v +° Qa a, m ° m '� H m m 3 , v c ai C `� v m C v a w a C C m m y C v v u E +� v +� O > d aao °� +' " u N cn +' °' v E � m .v ° a a > C a m a v v a, u U0 Q) to v N v D0 C a v > > o C u C O o oa C u v v m m v c o V) v C ,� V) 3 m ° O = E m m U •� m >, 0p > u -a C O •- O >, = D •? m +, .E 000 p *' V >, ua N a m +� - aJ aC a v a a — u C Ln m ar — m o O •— a, E — O — a; *' v S9 u a, o > +� _r_ v u 0- v C >, O u a \ C L N u L a N u �, m N L 'c cn L O "a tip E v o ° �' a' N m `° °0 0 m v a v w v m v +, - a 3m u-0 C -0 a a o c U v U +' U o a; o a ao m a .� v a C a > v D0 Q) -a x a v 0 E v o 0 QJ C m n ami+ .E C Q 0 ate+ V) m .0 N > m ate-+ C �, C N O DCO fN6 L - N N +�.+ cN-I E a m o c .— )- -a - m +� a mA-Z C ° - u Ua w aao •a v m a m a V m m > � v — C w 3 > °� > F o .E o D0 v 0 3 •a ° o o '� cn o v a, +� 3 3 m m U N O U C n — C ate+ � '+ > N Q) > a E —_ a a ° m U C W N O E O L E �' E O m o - .s o o �' .S v o m v 3 0 0�' U° o °a LL - ° L O O _y Y 3 w L d i d O O O O O O d ' E Q Q Q Q Q CL S 7 D D D D D m d L d a a a a a E p m m m m m E U U U U U Vf L H r ��.. C � QJ d HfC6 Q) fC6 Q) fC6 � fC6 O E � � - Q 0 D0 0 D0 0 D0 0 D0 0 Q) 0 v 0 v 0 v 0 Q Gl V m Co Co Co V)i 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-71 Att A Page 329 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 00 � m o om -0 E m > 0 0 0 _a a, a, m °p a, �' M O N C O "O N 'U +' .0 Q- N N O r_ '+-+ C _° 0 C N O O tw L C M Q) _° OD O t — O =� m N N O N N 7 0 N O LL N !2 OD u o "O 0 E O ObD +� +-' '� Q > C N = > fl- X C U �O O O) r- > U "O m m "O "O m U E O N U OD O vii O NO Q .110 O N O f�6 ate-+ �, i O E x f6 f-6 fN6 C) — >,r 0 m m -r O - a, -r- 0 Q) m W -0 ° v m +� Q) E 3 'E S ° o E o �O C Q ate+ N a" E 00 E V U C N L U >- L m OQ OO OU O � Uw v � O 0O OD O vv 3 U ° N° ° N — = c E o- �-.m C "° NO of6 '> ' O ` ° m C Q) 00= a, ° a, a, •CO omO N o U m -O + C U O OjQ .OOO o— OLmOOm U i m "N Q O h0 N N -r tteQ) tio " Q) LL Qa+ C LQ � m -O + 0- NvN ,w O0- =3 O E o O m E co — v *' ° C C 0J E r, m U m a, 00 � C o o m a, -O N C L +-+ . > i Q=)3 ° rl 7 C N C O m 7 Vl +I+ O d ° m ° Q O C > m ° O u t v m 0 +� u U E >, n aJ m 0 u C aJ = U '+� = aJ z ° r 4 UM +� � E :+' m m m � - v E .+� u E C S C -° a, C a a, � m v fl ° � >, a, — C 4„ — fl o ° c H O o m o o z v H o H H oN o ° ° .E o C t10 o M � M rn CL C 00-� E u w m N fV W N 'V? 00 O O > CO m C *�'' O v 0 O C +�+ .- X i O N 00 O Q O 0 00 O Ln t O 0 M1. N +m-� O v U m �' ° C C U L 00 m a, m a °- 't a, C O E v O 7 L U V1 U Q -0 — m C 0 E +J L E O O n m v C 0 00 o W v •o *N-' m mo - �n �n �' U C — �p V m E m = ° m v E E N m v v r > O ° N M1• C ° o- V a-+ O O ,n v v O O ., > +� m O C ate-+ +�.+ O o M .0 1' M U N E E m o > m E > a, O N "' ate+ -a N -° ~ C N v m m Ov v = > 7 m , Q O aJ m H E +� U C ° O O O N L U N > E ou Z OU a -a Q Vn V)- .E L O O +, 3 _y L d L O O O O O Q.E Q Q Q Q CL S 7 D D D D +U. +U. � m E p m m m m ip E iu v v v 0- <Q H 5 r ��.. C N � d � E m r C O ° M C.) U U v U Gl V) V) N V) E-72 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 330 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) .. N O E U f0 — >= d � O O E O) 0 � + U O O -zt v v7 v v N ON 5, 0 0 H t t m d a-+ 00 fl- mfl- N O E +J ° O 0 v m e ° c C a)N N U N N a) + E v ao E d L n N U M E "° N E N > p >? >? O N N O Q a-�+ •� 0--O >j O m 0, U ++ E U U L U L C a) C C OU O �O N O _O �O E 0 �O � a0 7 L a-+ (C6 n c0 v E — O E N N > + N > O Q O m N a 1 u L N C m h0 m C O > m °U L H Q Q H 7 Q N >� L >� L >� N "° N N >� bD N N L w L L Y U Y co ao 'v E ° _ C > E E °; C m O v O v — E O v �; v- aJ o n o C Ib.0 O u O C N +J ro Q u m +° O + +� E N +, N U- 00 u- C m m ° L — > o ao C > m C v E v v v E �' E o o � > o `L° o n = v m v � N m 3 —t E N o � U O � °� N ° O -0 v CO > (J a U O 3 O v U ao C +� c t. a c o v ao— a 3 = ao N m > .0 o C 0 m m N �n *' vmi O O •E O N N O O N Z O -00 00 "O •� Y m N Y o0 -a 1 - o `n o o ) c E c o •� ao = 3 0 C O aJ aJ m C 4 5 +� '— O W > aJ -0 aJ aJ aJ — C L H m N c o .v c U a u o m v v - C u " o }; 0 — a. � .— °�' v u o m a u a, fl 0 a, 'E Q) �' m ° a, m `° o ° �' o v m O c m m v 3 v v = ° a a° — ao u w += u �, v E a m 'm E N C N Q — ° m O > ° U i L 1 +j O — i ° 0 E Q — ° C + N '� a m o f ,C L > v a, O U vi ai �' *' o ao E u S9 m o }' v 0 fl u v v > O a Q� .2 v v 'v a 3 m o m t > aJ aJ v O m aJ m aJ t .0 io w p a 0 v O C u m E d — C U L 0-0 L 0-0 m — Q — Vl L O m 3 + L 'L m = m H L N L O O O +' 3 o L d Qj {A d Y m N r U0 O d 0. E �_ M aJ m CL S 7 Q a EA 0 V Z u U0 m 7 R R O .Q m L U E aDa m � m"E m - E U o U o U Vf L r i+ C � C N — N > d m E m MC a 0 O N n c Gl V N > m 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-73 Att A Page 331 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) oa �. v m u co l0 Q >- O O 0) 0 ° E o 0 uc �O Q)Q O a) _ 3 a ° NO CL MH t a+ Q U0 u C L C m •� + C C CL Q N O Q Q EE E Q 0O E v = E E ° ai Q fl 'a°-o a Q Q v O m O c > > L .0 t LO u Y L L E7 M X d O O O > Q +� Q 00 Q u c UQ) H m m Q 3 H H Q CL 00 Q Q c 0 m t M m!- m O Q N vi C i N r6 0 °J Q) d + + ° Vl N N Q f6 N b.0 L o Q ,� a �, v Q m m o Q a t H •� o ' o `�° a o v ao c o 'u c .E o o Q o O •° 3 `° Q a0 O Q L O � Q N ° u •° v - C O + O �' Q = u } *' d u u — N O 03: o +� _ H Q cc W— Q Q -O m 0 c m c 'a O N O LL y,, O a.., Q m m Q "O m 0 0 m Q C 0 0 v C C v c M o v c -0 v 0 0 = C f+ '+_+ +-+ L .Q O O Q -J _ *' Q >, O Ln >� Q O � V1 C C •}, Q LL "O i O_ p vQi c Q 'n C `� L C �n i O E .2 .O Q J Q L E i Q Q 0 Q � E Q iJ Q +J Ui O N m Q ,� m 0 + L C Q N -Q O Q O C L Q u m J u Q Q Q I C = �n — "Q O U Q E a C Q = t u Q Q .Q C a 'Q) X � m Q u O a-2 0Q r u '� Q `� Q — Q o--C +� () Q +�-+ Q E 7 �' C O0 O �, '� U 00 O v *N'' u O Q O f6 'E N N � N "O L _ — +� — _ �O ° "O ° .� C m Q •� O Q ° Q Q � Q "O >, Q "O O _ �o '� v aJ `° OU Q m Q L C C Q ate-+ ° ate-+ a o -Q C O Q Q `L° N •� fN6 •>, O O0 O u m 0 +J ,� E Q 0 00 C Q `� "O Q C Q N o '=' n Q m m aLn -C N -° -Q > 41 O0 m Q) m ° Q Q +Q L C C Q O M tw O m C Q C J m Q N O m +J N Y "O Q Q m '^ O m "O o ° LL O -0 LL ) 0 LL LU '*' Q y c c v c -0 .E O _C -O E 3 c u C in c Q > ° J �' ) Q E N +' C a� ° m fl h0 N > N N h0 c-71 N O -c 0 U J ° O N n > C N O L N Q E adv-+ j 0 m 0 N ° 'N Q •� N c ~ O f6 .f6 m v +� v z ,O adv v v adv-+ v u m 3 t j 0 Q Q .� Q Q °J co c E o 0 0 Q v o m c - m c -Q c c Q c c w Q c Q E Q *' Q c u Q c m c c o .c E U m H "O +Q-+ +�-+ H O E N Ov m fl- m "O Y "O "O m U O Ov L 0 +' l0 N n 00 _ 3 d °0 •f6 ° c •5 0J45L E Q o Q Q c R 7 J 0 _ C a ° O a a 0 0 y s Z O Q O a ° c oC v V d c ° c - D m t. c O w c -J —M 7 R R +Q) ° Q C Q Q tD •O vmi m a L d a voO E CO ° m m v 0 a E vY o v v ° u° o Vf L al ice+ C C C r Q Q Q > d E E E CQ b. Q t Q t a 0 C C C a V E-74 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 332 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 C: o �6 � � v c U fl- 0) v m c o •- N Q) v N 0 N O ~ O 0 L c O c c c Q Q Y Q) Q) Q) N N E n E E E d L E •°J E E E u� M 6 O O O O O o o a E 0 0 0 0 Q > U > > > Y C i N a O O _ O O O tm O O C O O O E d > N � � � p +) u c O H O H H H CL c •� _ 00 E N aJ 0 0 0*' > n O N N — > m a, O u E +� c i v H Ln 00 E } a - a o o c ° -- .E E C a a a, o °Ja ;° }>- ac-o v = a 0 m o �, -3a v - v a, J r v 0 ° c v E o m .� E = 3 v T -0ac m a a o .� 0 v o0 v 0- u o ° a a; " *' �' N '� >, o a m E c c 3 = a c v -0 , v x a,m v 0 m 0 C ° Q) u o `° E E v a, ° 0 c o o o > a a, N o L v 3 SI c m v v n E u ~ o v -0 a N v 3 v c '+� O m a, 00 m a a tw u � •N o c > m m > E aco - a, N o 0 C 0 m N .0 N v Q O Q N 00 � E x0 v0 o v N *-r- � L0 Q) - 7 N N — j, U N'0 0 -0 .'^ C t ,moi, O .-- -a n O +' O N N m �, > O N Q oz yu v v v . U 0 .� >, +6 v ) +m E m v � � aJ co o v 3 > - N c o a v v o m c c 3 v 3 '+� m m i O >, c ,n in N O Q O 0 M 0 N 00 E 0 z E o a o c E c v ° '�;,, o v E E n 3 E m Z a, V a, 3 c o m QE Q) v o 0 00 aco -aa o v _ N OU c +�+ m � m c L c "O m a0+ N N > 00 .� m +�-+ N 0 C aJ - v c `-° aJ N aJ � c -a ,� o aJ a >, E °J aJ io o c ._ ._ o m m -a � m v 0 ° o v m , m a c � x m c w u o � m E c - - E a a 0 _ U > 3 00 ±' E O m H aH w 3 -0 a +, m +, H C7 L o 0 .1 L O C11 d L d v v O 6 0 D- 0 CL R 7 N t Z > 16 u o°1c v U d o o u i m E a p m U m m a m E U H U W U W U 7 N Vf L H QJ i0+ C w d > N ,moi, ,ten m m c E � o o �, o CL V E v o N H N N > m 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-75 Att A Page 333 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) o N m U) c O m C d a a Q) m n O 0) N L LL + + O *' C � v O N ` - O E m O N ~ O N O O C +' +� 0 L C > a C.w v v >, f6 N N E .'^ 00 r0 LE 4r� N O OC: Mate-+ N .— Q) >= N w E O O O Q Q N CO 0 v + U w E o Em a > E a > Q) 00 +� MO °� C C v v ao� � u v .0 H O u 7 Q C hD 00 rq C1 O C- =' L L C �O f6 (0 -O 00 c E Q 3 v > +� —i x f6 C v Fu v v L N OU N fl N O a_ — — N N Q fl 0 m f6 u f�L6 fC6 v ao m = m o v a Q = o E 5 m E .> •C Q v o N f�6 110 L V L C LL "a O C O 'n 0 L "O _ ti0 z .0 +L-+ O C 0 "O U N L r6 U C -O 7 O L . C > �n cc N C "O 00 E N hD C N -r M �' _ u N U N f6 O f6 O � G ti0 '� OU N �"� N N Y � �"� N •Y N Y W (6 N N O (O 7 N h0 E �O '+' O +�-+ .� v C .v 0 0 �n ;� N 0 J O C aJ d 00 v � -C Q v Q O 0 Q U O C +' O C v `� O v ro Y E o E E o �aoC u 0 v o .� E a C E v v C o v v O N U 'v ro u vi r0 > +� n - v a v f 0 ro O C u QT V O u C ° -00 'N iE > 00 C X C 00 N v .0 E O = m p C0 N 7 N v v ai '� ;6 0 m •v o v v > E +� ) E u v o co a •� o •� 0 c *' o - M a E v v f6 °' 2 (D G o0 (, Op O ° v fC6 Q C >> N a� .-- C m C — *� CO 7 E � +agJo •E °c =3 !E 3°' O ao c � oO > gEvO O O N > N NU U U O a > . - -0� 0 N -E � L0 Q) 3C: - - C Q) U o o Q u _ m =3 O v �Cmn � v M W v > o C 0 a N O v v c °� v ao v v a o v v m m 0 '� U E m fl v v v E O m H en m 3 N Q N -0 u u H m a a E L O O Co0 Y w L vhf d d C 0 CL U W S Z Q a v V d t`0 E a 0 E v Vf L N 41 ice+ Q C r6 u w Q C v C O C o v CLEA v E-76 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 334 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O Q) a ° m v Q m -O U Q N w O M O m U Q v O N a 0 Q J d ++ t > aJ U N O ~ v _ OL C: Q) Q5 t Y > N 0) E 'v C •� d L E ` M 0 — L o M Q .20 V C� Y > w E O '0 U .O Q 1 Q Q w _O c-I v U 7 N N O G d E ' C - EE O o 'X '� v E w '� TE v E a CL +, fN-6 N N •� fC6 0 •� -Q Q) H L Q C o 0 o a Q) +� o 0ro C v o C v +� +�+ +7.+ "O p00 O N N N •L vi C UJ U X a' 00 m x �n f6 N -Q `� f6 >� V V) C U U UJ C f0 t UJ of +� UJ N W of t E v N v o .>_ v Q) -0 H `: M y -0 0 a a = E � � Q m o f � = 0' o m vY o vt aL o v Ln U U O O N N > = O UJ Y +� -Q U t C *' -Q O O .'n i U E V1 '� +� Y Q *' UJ >• O m N _ _ 0 > CO � L N f�6 O i C v +�+ Q '^ fT0 -O O U v -Q 0 .0 *' t 00 O +-+ N O O v N E i C f0 w U E C +' *' o 7 O E O N v - N +' D- H Q O N O E UJ 0--0 v w Z C a� r0 - C L O L ro C o 0 C 0 a � v C E u f0 � at eo v C °� o z - 0 C f6 >- Q- ' � c � Q) v ago U � � � o 'Z Q v � — o v -r- �o Q v w E C -Q N -O n M 00 -O O U C f0 U L .— v v v N MM O O -Q � d; N Q O '� -Q C CO 7 t0 C C > -O V '� QeoT oO o O o U 0 uf0 - u m OEm Q) m U vu 0 o v vf0 =C Q v :3N OL L _ 2 Q U Q) o E N UJ YoU oEv E6 or Q) a a Q w m O UJ OQE U O O -1 0} fl- U O O C QUU O UZ0 O S N eEO C E C = - Y N y , QUC 6 o E EULaQJ E v N N v c a o °c° o L E ro +' E 0- x C + ro ro O N O U N "O i +� O r6 +� -O 7 Q +� to C .'� M N Q v Q E O O E c � � v v C U v a L a o — v v v v v v -1 7 a +� o v O O +J 7 Q 0 0 � x l0 7 t O 'O UJ '^ t v m o X U C O N LL +J O U i H N rl LL 2 U ._ L 4— +� 111 -O U U -0 UJ -0 L 0 0 Y 3 w L H L d H d N Q. CL m Z Q � v m E a 0 E U Vf L H r ice+ m r E f�6 O EA M U v Ol LL 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-77 Att A Page 335 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 0 a c °; � o O o n 0 Y O N v v N � � Q) N O 0 ` N v CL N N E v E ao i O N O w w E O C CL C O O Ctf E Q E d N O u u c •� u � Q) H V) CL 00 E v 0 ° Q O +�-' ° -°o O O UJ O N N °J o "O N a C v ° vE -y t v o m O O 0 - M c m I C: v m -0 o Ln v 1:1 -0 � Q +� > fl v v v u oo o co m E 0 3 oa u o v aN w c v m o v E a � z L v v o o > a E � v °+�' c v M m v —' o 'n c o X o o N o E O °�' v = m c t. ao +' c 0 v ro c c a v 1- ' +, m m 0 3 = v v ° m ro o r- •� .v v a •� -0 o u a \a o v Q E s o m a v L i� > o v — > v m o v v v ° c o E v ° C -" > m +' ro c .- o m c a 3 E '� v u -a °� i V cn vm Q hp *' to O 0 Q o O N m O u Ou vO� v Q u O Q v 0- .-N O v E Q u U .� Q }, O O m "O O N m "O n 00 41 'i t rp O ,� -O d O N m N -O — mo Ln m m +� Q v .E v *' (n C _ ° L U O v 00 'n C O O Q Q *' m E c L t - +� L v m 0 Ln v +� m v c m m m u v x a Ln Ln t o Q- m °23 C o c E — v m .v �_ •� o = v E c O +� o -O = O v >' a, ,n U m +, O N c °' > N N C -0 C N N E g v E L 0 ° N L °° cn EU c .c E > c > m o o m O 0 v M o v e v o u u u LL a m °- � ^ � 0 u >• +) w u U 'o > a 'Q +� v c m c u W O c v O u c E u N v) UJ O X UJ UJ L Q O v - o E L N � 0 - +-+ N M N � N � E -0 L UJ K i o Q m O C o U m u H .� -0 +J +, "O N 'O L O O _y o CL a� ta3 tw a a, s Z D- m E a 0 E U Vf L H r ice+ m m r E f�6 0 U v W 41 LL E-78 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 336 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q V C: Q Q c Q C m 0O Q f�6 .0 '0 U U Q L U L Q n Q C) n L O 0 O M C) t0 N r' Q Q O 0) Q > Q d +S' Q O C +' v +� N 0 L C C Q C C C. Q E O U O Q 0 N E N E v E E '- 0�0 �_ L O u O O O O E c N Q O L C Q •L a Q n Q 7 7 U O Q + 41 O Q O O O 2 Q 7 -0 C7 Q L a C Q O O O O C O -° O 0j O "a O t]0 E !2 >, aQ., "Q l0 N Q N C Ou Q u C v C C u C >O C O 3 Q doQ -0 DO C U O Q �, _ Q (D a-+ ° +�-+ O f6 7 tio Q L Q = N U >_ w Q t p t t E U _ Q DO m Q Q — Q U — N _° .� x L f6 O ate+ V1 V1 Q l]0 S 0O M Q U C Q f6 U U w Q w �, L ^ "Q O Q C � N "Q f6 u Q L U ~ Q .0 ~ f6 lD ° L ° 'L E °� a w E aco a Q E c fl F ° n3 Q E c +, v Q m H v 3 Q ao Q Q E 00 0 0 Q o v °p v v } v LL E v O o C7 v° C Q) Q) c x Q °0 - 0o - Q LL �n v, Q i r6 Q C L E b.0 p0 u Q U ON "a Q E .'_^ +-+ Q +-+ •� = 00 O u -° �j +' C 'a Q Q �' C a-+ ._ LU -a L C �, m W C "a f6 C0 vii "a +Q-+ M a� L C 7 i Z> C — ,Q U0 -a L > f�6 *�'' V c E w 3 ao E E Quo o u � c a > c c i u *' '� a v a Q� Y 6 Q o N �, v a u ° ° Q > `° n o Q v o `° E c Q _ fl o Qj E �' > Q Q ao `° a v Q v N o v N '° ° c v Q E c v ° o E m u m u oo N '3 v v o .w a Q .° E c v +� ° u Q a N b. ° m a ro c c o a Q u o a Q v ;o tw W no c o u E +� ° a +� a Q E to Q a .E v n3 c v O a-Q Q u t c v Q) —=3 M v n3 .0 amio .E v ° v o Q v .� c .E Q 3 °a O +� .E o E v o c � Q •� a; o u Q v `° c o to v - m o c -0 D s-, o aCo O a 3 u Q - m Q +, O c a0 O `�° o o E v O m �a o v E o o Q Q Q a E E 4 H cn a U m 0-u U H w t oo Q a 3 u E ii E o cn Q a L O O _y L- C C Q. E l0 l0 l0 l0 Q lG 3 Q Q Q Q `^ S Z O V V d t0 a L d Q Q Q Q E n3 n3 n3 n3 E U U U U 3 Vf L H r ice+ w d n3 n3 n3 n3 o Ev v v v CL '0♦ -a -a -a -a Gl U LL LL LL LL 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-79 Att A Page 337 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) 0 *' _ N C am U C E N O O Nm u (B N m C fl — a L .� N 2 C .� O U U ._ _ 0) ate.., am+ C •+�+ E C O N m V -0 N m L L N N O N N 0 u fl N O Q) +� ° C C Q) u n CE N C .'� O L N O O N M� N N LL C 7 N C m N O C O E x .0 L O N Q.,� v O m C N 0) a 0L - L *' a> W L L N N N fl' •m C >' O N L �n Q 0 0 •L Q) 'n Q E L L m a+ CQ) t C'4 N C U C = +' •U N N W O E a m � a o u .-. N O b. O ?: >, 'U U U U .0 N 7 CL e00-I ) L n O O -0 0 '^ O C N 0 U to H m m O O a- N — Q Ln >, ON O `.- C V7 t t •m ' O m N O *' O 00 C *—�' UNJ C O UUJ = W L vC +�- 0 C C) ?� 0 -O C O m u V N N N C U O O O t u C ,� ° Q O E 3 m -0 00 m -a L �' O m o O � 0 >'H � a m On > t w m ° � O t ° - � � � N0 � Q) E Q � O � 'L N 00 aJ m m - O O O U O O Q L - C: C O CO U n Q) Q i U O N a-+ U C M m '0 Q) � N t 1 C C m +� •� m O > O C Q) >• N m >, n 0 v u > U Ln V) On m m 10 Q t O m Q-5 C m *' Op H O c m v - a v ,, +� a ° ° i ao n ° � ° a ago aUo •f6 t E o d 0 Q Q) o0 � +� c o c O O O O O ,, - =tm C ,, O 0 � x � .� m C 0 0 Y a-+ EO N Y u .� E -0 , U m C L - Q Q m � � -1 m C N -O O W Q m L > +� c V) m a-' Q) 3 m t c L m Q) Q O U > C C v O C fl t Um) Q N >' O C 0 > v bA '� m 0 0 +J •N C +� •7 V CO Ln C •0 m O u aC-� H O m •O L m +� C O x V) ? U m •� Q) vOUi C >. U W O) 7 V7 _ LJ U O) N C ° O O v > Ln O m L C m m D > C to O m +- " M t -0 Q C E v > m Q1 N O — -0 -a +� z t -0 O O L U C m m bA 7 ~ 0) l0 aJ f6 aJ +� L O U m C E N Q) N m -a m U V7 U t 4' +t)D + U Q 3 � � U 0 N O) -a Q ate-+ a-+ N - - aJ > O C7 .� o a; �, 3 .E p O t .s Q O w 0) m r, W L t Q) — vf u C7 Ln 2 N N = C C 'ate t Q C m � C Q O m U) �' m U to l0 ~ O �' C L m C C C ON (D m ON E w .0 m O •O m 3 O C t '^ t C E io i.i ap o �j u >, °C0 >, o > a Z Lon � �O +' t •� � L � � � � � •c ii � m m P- � w O .� ^o U m aJ 0 O m '3 Q bCA O O O m O m O o0 +� a v ?� O v c O c L v� 0 + 0 > 0 c r m " v0 3 0 Q v m y U C U Ln N O N O a•+ C C W O U +� O l0 O) U O O C E U "O C C L N U L m U +� ^ m L7 � C7 O w C C t ao +� •L L m 0) iCo m o >, v O O aJ t O a) �=C�11 O u �=CI�11 O 0 O tCo O -" f6 0 v 0) 0) t C d N Q }+ }+ Q }+ C L V ou m ._ V W L 11 ' ou ._ L 40 Q U - VI 0- 0- 0 d0 0 +' w L d d d . CL a w R 3 a y m m E a 0 E v Vf L H ice+ > m C fL6 0 U v 0 Q) W E-80 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 338 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) o � -a � v O � Q m v °�' 0 0 O o > o c rn a o- o Q; � E o f 6 _ � ° v N 7 m U ++ !2 O "O O *' O a-+ i o N OL O X O O O01 m t .N-i O O M v Q v '^ in O -O 0- 00 N �n > c oN ELL v -0 v m Q a � v v 00 O 0i v o > E 3 c c o N +m+ 0 "a "a C f0 .� 0 a..; i +U+ U ++ N O ++ N o N ._ m ++ U C N m m N 00 N N O m N c - O uo Q) E c O N 0 N C C O o E N +L O c o L N N .� c 71 ~ O - O > f6 E - - •0 C L U N m N N CL N N m E j N O O vUi O m m .Q O U OU Q N O •� N 7 N m *' m LL ,v •X c c N N N +� N +-' O O m 0 W m i s 0 .N 3 N c �; v U c o o v io c n v O C Q n E m O U m E oo -o N m v c C C U _ O - a O 0- c v U .c ` c c v 47 m w E N N ++ m U N m N > N ++ O '� O C CL c > O U X N o > o v +, � O 0 >- m !2 O 7 ++ O OU 0 +m+ '�>—, �n N i +m+ O N OC—0 0 W L Q Z Q) "a V N i N N N E Q �n �n ++ U0- 0 o N c-I 7 N O E �n L L •}, L N L N L 0 7 C N N >, ++ N L N fl- L N N N �n n H +� a H E U O v= 0- n m i Ln H e w O v e a 00 Q) o M1• C C U o M1. c m N m o UJ N O o C t 00 3 v -0 U v m m 0 aJ t L i ) +.� In •U UPJ `~ 00 O o +� c- E E U c t 3 c N v 0 0 m U O O m — > v 0 0 C c ~ v E 0 Q o t O +' > U Q 00 o f E 0 > +� v LL, v 0 > ; m i L m v v O o C ar m = v O O 0 t +� o m +� E 0 v c U 3 oao N - v v v m m t > U u �O T C � m > E Q E Q *O u O U Q i .— a-+ C f0 t +� LL m > N ar m O 0 C X +� OUm Q) O O '6 U o U '^ c v, O UJ C f6 UJ i Ln N -0 C i O o E 00 N E N v 0 O v �O U 00 Y +m m 0 c v m .> t v Q O f0 v C v LL v v E 0 v E E 0 a -6 v E � ¢ °c° u > 0 E N UJ : :+� W v i m •i C o UJ 0 E Q m O ~ N n v o C v E +� n U 7 +' - 'O > > N o > m UJ m m N t v m N OU C: uU ,� U uU 00 aL aL L O 0 _y � L d l0 l0 4+ Q. a lG 3 a a y L Z 0r OU m E d 0 m m E v v 3 Vf L H r ice+ m m r E M o -a -a Gl U LL LL Or 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-81 Att A Page 339 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 +� -a v 7 +-+ U U Q, O � N L N — m N N N m Q "OvOi C m N !2 O V1 O U O C C U N N n E U +�+ m 0) E f6 �n �n �,, +-+ f6 f6 f6 -0 L O N N W Q) E E °� m +' +' +' 3 :U a f6 O c e Q) N O N >• m 4- 4 m W OU 00 — O C.w O U N 0 N C > > f6 = 7 f6 a O O N U — N > -a .+� v -r- 0 O U O o - c aa-o v v E S E L L N - L L f6 W G N O O U C C C 0 ~ O ++ >� �O _Q •M N •L L N Op U N N •0 U 0 - � w E o `Q -0 .c v v v a = v °� •" c U CL 7 C 4; N O Q Q) -Ca -Q .0 C m C f6 0 o o > +� 3 m y w Q E C � � H m o v E Q � C Q f0 �n > i 0 0 O O L C N C +� N N N N L O `b — = vii u !2 N ° N +� +� +� N +0 > O 0 V c > > N i Q Q Q " OU0Q t O t aJ O X Vl 7 r0 'n N U "a 7 Q 00 o c v v _ C �� H N t v i M 0 -O f0 +' - +0+ N "O i N v o _° O C UJ *' o h0 O ° C L f�6 f-6 N 0 -1 = W O N .0 L L N Q) L v O C L + n0 E Q E +� v a o �_ v •° o m c v E c o o > fl o v o N � v v v v o +� a o - °° a°o N o E m Q E > o 00 CO hC0 u 0 +� X Q, O 7 E W 0 f 6 >M E U a0+ U O U 'a-+ 0- u f�6 T _ U � v o o v v C v L C C O r0 ° > E " ?: E Q n - r0 = •� O > ro f0 v Q u v o *' f0 v v ° a Q a °° v > C ° LO t a v ° v a ao m N O O > O o O = ° L E ° - Q +� v_ f0 U ro v C v O 3 'v v a+ r0 O C L C v .� U N r.. �, N O O O +� N W M > C 0 E i O j +' UJ C: r\ v v0i N _° O L ON •L (� O UJ = > O v� h0 L _0 t t0 +-+ rl' +' N >, ?j W L > o ° o +� U a= — +� .� Ol Q v i Y Q +� v a�0-+ Q f6 N a-+ C) o N m Q L L ro E - x X t vE a v v C C N N = U f0 Q m N v W *' O "C = N +-+ 7 vCi � 0 L 00 O E .°_ i o m m v +� v ° v .c 3 Y -O v v t C -0 +, v v +� -O O _0 E >,-O C �n .v +-+ d +J O v C 7 > UO T 00 C .- +0+ +�+ v0i 0 Lnm fL0 ('D f0 N U N 0 a-+ L v O E M •- C U Q � N Q +� 7 L -0 u 0 N � N .S +0' i .� �O u d v 7 *' -O LO* N t0 t -O v C C v C *' }' _° >' C 0 C L Q) v v v o C v ao O v E .+, 00 Cc: m o v > v c 3 v E o a 'n us o a Q U m u .� - ° a o o ° o o Q v L 0 0 Y Co L L- 0 0 W W C. M R 3 a a a W m Z 0t U +0. +0. m d L d Q Q Q E r0 r0 r0 E v v v Vf L H C iC+ w d o Ev v v CL '0♦ -a -a -a w U W W W CL E-82 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 340 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 �. v c v c� -0 a > 0) N o v N M N � d 0 U N O C p c Q 2) QC E i O O u O Q > N C w E O 0 E !2 > O O v u � � H E CL M c -a +' v > _ 0E r6 = Y Vf v c-I Vcl Q Q U f6 m .0 ate+ 7 •+� of of f0 UJ O C N C 0 W `.�_ f6 j. +�+ +�+ N f0 i •a.., :n -O vNi t +�+ O O N �n i v� v� UJ i cm: Q 7 ~ N Q aL O M a' UJ 0 LO Q O i u v Q- u h0 7 N N hD +' to -O vTi 7 t Lo Q .� iii v h0-O v m "O L `� u N C i v H i of O t0 N O of O _ 7 a-+ O a-+ L N -O i O a0., T Vf Vf i N i Y O O 7 O O ro Q" C N p v� *' UJ ro UJ -0 O u t W �n N +J of +O+ C 7 +�+ .'� O f0 O u ~ Q >� N 00 Q- v t6 L D o Q h0 U N �' 0 0 T i UJ o f6 >_ — O_ N L 3 m � i f0 +� O 3 `.t +� u v +� O of Q fE0 ,UJ i f0 +� �i O f0 > Q- Ln — v ro +' D ro ro aJ 0 t ro Q O x O w O O +-+ �n Q L "O w v *' � O U _ �, � o D_= v v Z o U 'v 7Au v �o v - - O Q v c O ro n � 0 •E v Q) 0- ro U +' M t *' M U T O '+� E 0 > 3 H 3 ro Q +� eo 7 V H v "O O v c c + t m 0 0 0 w 0- v� u m 0 0 0 0 m 0 E o 'O 0 ?) ate+ Q N f6 3 w O C i U f0 C C C ~ +' vii -O >, Qj ro —� ro T O O C N p N L a� O O v '^ i > v t C h0 v Q_Q C t0 O t]p h0 C -O O v' _O W +-+ M M t O +� Y LO '^ t]p N Y O O O- 3 N ~ h.0 O .� O- �n N j >, — v 3 x v i v 'i 0 .S u v tD = •� '^ O O O v E O V C D_ M N — +� +� of O of Q v N 7 >. ci O U •_ f0 — o = v E D_ v 0 m E ° o t ° v 0 o o Y o f0 u o v E a u o m ._ o ao = u ._ 3 3 ._ — u 3 t a E u L `O O _y Y w L- L- L d rn CL a� M 3 a W m Qj OU m E a 0 E v Vf L H C ice+ C f�6 0 U v W Gl W 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-83 Att A Page 341 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 +' Q O u Q U � C � C v b.0 +, (0 .� v N N �' L a U U V1 -i U X00 M U ON v C }, C 0 E C f6 Q Q a N > a o a Q O N O ~ Q O L C C O 00 C .*' a C CL N Q O � C Q f0 Q N a E u bf =n u E E E E d E o E L 3 Q E 6 L O U o o u Q)o *' � � o �C •i 7 "a 7 C U 7 w E O Q Q w O Q -r C O Q 7 >� +' E L >� > > f6 C C O vCi 0 O '^ O O N Q Q "O E O) C 7 r6 n L n (0 O C �n �n N O U Q E a Q ' �� > v a E > p y Q o ao My '� Q E i U C N O Q C Q Q QLn C t ou t X Q v t H L O LU Q -0 L H CL 00 o Lu -C T E N U U •� C C O n Q +-+ 'U v0i U M m t Ln t ro � O �- +� Q 7 UQ Q) Q C Q C u Lr -0 M "a f�6 ate-+ Q T � L E of 'a r6 L O U L Vf O L of C f6 *' C Q"— O .E "O +Q) v' Q lb v bo }' v Q L t0 rl v Q m of O OL X 'n o E u U u p Q Q .� N �O O Q of O v� Q Q .L 0p Q L 00 v �n Q O E to Q E O _ +� +' i f0 C i •� U N Q Q 0- 0 U .+.+ "a a-+ vUi i > f�0 O Y Q C O U o E C T > v > Q °�° o o v ai f6 c .� v Q U � Q u 0 o 'C t m E 0 o C E �, v "� E Q Y Q u Qa C i+ ip E v +�' C '� O *O' L N CO •� 000 aQ-+ C C +' LO 0p O -mi - T O O m >, C +�+ C O *' +' "O �O +' U Q� Q M '^ v Q � O C C t d N C C O C f6 +U O Q C a r0 0) L ^ +' > v L 0 v 000 Q Q 'O Q C Q 00 •v' U Q C •Q 7 N U >' U -O Q O U C .� m C L - .0 +-+ -a 0 O � O � +�-+ O of �O t 7 j of .0 ,� C E C O 'O Q 7 O +� '^ Q c�.� N O N U �n 7 O }' > C +' O L •C N U a Q u a C t Q +� Q Q > °° a - o — Q a Q Q � U ro 0 0 Q o Q o .� � N o v o � 0 0LF- o Q .LO Q) 7 Q � � " v -o C a y U O > of U 110 tjoQ 00 L +' Q N L -0 m L of C C d +� C M -O O E o +; E v o ? o ° C LQ +' t ro °U' v u Q L of L Q ++ L Q O +' 0 tjoL U -a C Y U f 0 iJ +Q+ (10 ) 0 M ++ Q) N C f6 f6 L +�.+ O N U +' - U Q O Q Q C C 00 v C C Q v Q N v — '� N f6 f�6 ) N U +�.+ +Q-+ E Q 00 f0 �, ,� of , O Q O C +� O v� t t0 O -O 2 Q C U C r6 O C m O C .0 0- -0 'O Q N of U U Q E `° ao Q r° .+� ro v O O o ao E o *' O `�° *' _ > Q U Q O E c: -o � — +� -a _ ^ O -O of Q — E L L U r6 v E 00 O 2 Q C +J U f6 U Q of of Q Q Ln O m Q >, L L N N L -a C U Q Q L Q C _ f6 N E E LL O ro L Q L H .� U � U QE 3 NN O U m v v vl N E O -O n O O _y C d aE CL M 3 Q Q Q y LZ L L L 3 lG lG +Q 4 1 +Q m a L a Q Q Q E ro ro ro E v v v 3 Vf L H r ice+ � f6 f6 E _ — — r E Q CL O -aa -aa U LL LL E-84 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 342 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O Q c °' _ 0i o v N a Q O O O > N O ~ v C.w v v �> N E -r- . d i O Q O v + _ Gl E O C CL > .� O L Q 41 N E CO N N O a E E u C EoX u U M Q2 E CL °J 00 .1 > o f0 v v C ° Y O L a0 U i w 0 m O Y . 7 +>+ N U ate+ L f6 Q) 0 N � U 0 = >' U -O 0 U- C C O Q t C C O U M -O V1 N V1 C — U N ° - C .aV—, L Q 0 O Q C �- vi -0 'j, 7 N t -O N > E o o Q E v u - ' C m v C C C u v v m t ro 0 o v E ap L ° v — C > C :+� C C i+ +� +, UJ U E '+� C t0 .T C Y U +-+ N C CO f0 p 'U ) v N r6 O .� Q Z, ' '- ro -O K v v o a0-0 ro ro O OU U r- ro m Gl U -O C M 0 UJ C m U -O a-+ Q .0 U fl- aO+ v L +�+ E U 00 U C +' E o ao v — t v v E -0 c E c ro E v v c o c C E ao . i `�° a t v ° ° m ° c •°0 v 3 v N o .Q U o v 0 Ln a .E o f o v m o � ° o -0 v N U E 'i T N ` i 0 U > f6 ° M +� ' f6 ate-+ 0 _E O> -O f6 L N "O 0' -0 v ° O a0 > Q v ro N v 0 O O v -O M 0 *' N - f6 E L C LL L N E 0 ° a0 +' 0 iJ 0 0- +� v U 0 v N a� Q E f6 o o O v v v E _r_ N N N 2 v C L UJ E o -O -O *' U 0" 'O 7 - N Q .'^ ._ N a0 C 0 T U p v w 7 W o U >, f0 v a0 C `~ 0 ) C N •E +� f0 C O 1= vi v� U v� -O L C U to UJ �p U M = '^ U .z- -O C UJ o O C •+, +J U t0 +� T'O C t T Q N a0 �n .O t O C 0 -O *' Z O G Q vNi 7 C f0 i +' E CD C OC: 2 �, O O }' v .+� 0 -O Qu +' > O O u u ° to E 0 N L u t 0 u '.p m Q Q d; X v +- o C N •� 0 '� v +� +� E v ° f0 a v U v v v C v ° v ° •�, a > L ' -0m o E o ° 31 ° Q � v v o m m > v o v v E C Q U U a) a U u U _ E U U +� +� co +� m O H a U L L — 0 0 Y 3 w L 'n L d �+ l0 C. W m Z Q a OU d m E a 0 E U Vf L H C ice+ C E f�6 0 U v W 41 LL 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-85 Att A Page 343 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 r Q o "O o -r- Q N c O N C Q Q + G (0 -a > �n b.0 fC6 N +' N O 0v C a o E '} Q f6 f6 0 M Q C E OO C E � Q C O Qw C N O Q u �n Q .0 C ,Q -0 N 0 ~ ro , O O C - - +-+ Q Q Q -a O •E C CL Q O L 'E > N x f6 7 �, f6 ~ L N E U EOp L vi 7 O O N ate+ N O N 7 •' "O }' Q U Y 7 7 C U E O Q Q iQ N Op Lu E 0 O 41 C -aH w C E n M > ?j v t E E f0 O C C Op OCO '� a� N U Q vi d > Q O L r0 n i N + •�n Op �' C N O Q u C L 'j 7 O_ 'v W "O 0 ?: O Op H U V) Q 7 H a v o v v -aa CL 00 C 0 0 0 .� > — 3 ci o �n > V) o i Q L � � ro O O i0 a 0 w E O - c 3 O o E o 0 m C u o U W u o u D 0 � �' 0 1� 3 � o Q v ° •� Q ' m f6 .0 E L > Q U Q C Q C Q (6 (6 L �, +-+ O i ' 0 0 O 0 = Q t Q '^ 4' +� �' O ro Q mUUJ UPJ �n +' L •O t 7 '�C: Eu o0 — oC-0 O u t Q O m O C V) Q H w LJ Q Q Q Q Q +� U O p a E -a ro d Q 0 (o Q (o C (o o m a `6 o O Qo f0 E ° > C '° L E C N v, o 0 � Q L d >� 0 IA = Q Q .QLu tw O N 'Q Q 4+ .— 0 C L 4� E 0 w 0 C _� Q U U +� Q .E U O •L V +, Q O m N c Q N L O .E .2 O t (6 �' N L O u = O ++ O Q � U t 0 E _ o = U 0 Cr- +� U 3 o v v o 3 o QJ O (6 C: L M L Q to o Q 0 0 IA � Q C Q ao N E Q Q O '° �_ o o 3 3 c E o o ° ° a Q .2 X a Q 1 3 o v .o E L w Q 1� +� Q o m 41 0 (6 U (6 OJ L +•� L C Q N O O C 0 O — Q� Ian VI m O u E Q � = Q ,n � C 0 E 0 E U C fl ', 0 E C C M x +� Q >, 0 -0 >` � U � o .0 Q) a -0 M C U E 0 ao Q Q C 0 C E E U 0 C Q `° > C ° ° °�' ) > �, Q Q a o o U a C 'u Ln a; � 3 a0 ° o 'm 'm �°�' o v ° Q Q Q O 0 w >, 0 V) 0 0 L Q Q 3 a 0 2 0- �_ Q > E t OJ E Q C m L U 0 � N i Q N OJ L Q f6 f6 N N L O E H N L d N a E 0 Q � U Q Q Z L U H O +J O U U L L +J L U L 0 0 Y Co L w d L- C c daE � M 3 En ZQ a a , a� +Q. m a L IL 0- Q Q E m r0 r0 E u u u Vf L H w ice+ > > > w d E — — — o Ev v v CL '0♦ -a -a -a EA Gl U w w w CL E-86 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 344 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c � c� d a a) Q) O v' E N v N p M d +L ) O c c c c c O N to N E E E E E 3 0 d L E E E E E > O O O O O v O 0 Gl E O O O O O O V) CL 7 > C O O O O O OQj •� E O O O O O O O -r- Q)v u c c c c c c u m m m m m m E a 00 — � � aco v � — v a c ° a +� Q) Oa •u v o v N c c t t6 *' O "O N 'V O V) U c c L c ++ U0 O >. O L �v0i U O c h 0 0 V ro L N -a O O N +� O c c u O c i O N N L 0 �' 4' +L-' U t •� •0 o > '� 0 — E '� 00 a 3 ° ' c b.0co b.0co ov 0 O O v i~ 3 u L10u ooo ub.o ? > v U Y c ° v o E a v m o v u _a o :°; v a u E a m 3 o v v a v o o X —' m = +° - E o f ao .� :N v v v v v' E m C f6 c a-+w Q) •U N N J N o U N E ON L f6 C m u � +) ma c v 0 > E °Ja EQ) 0 f6 o E o v ao Y E -aa LU -r- Q) -1-- 3 = v o o ' o o o v .*' 4 v c O - '� 0 3 �a v E .v 3 v v 3 a -0 v o °; co •� Vo 0 "a "a N U ,� > .E +Q) n� c "a 0 u "a O 1L- m 0 0 •N ro N '0 � E ;u v -00 -0 f6 v ai E E c +� o v fl 'r6 oN 0 3 v v u v 0 O O m m o v v v c >, E °c° 'ao v �' E m f6 "a E O +�+ >� N c >' U O N "a N ++ O N N f�6 N •N OU O i E m � U - m m v U N u a o a E v o o a EA Q N Q 0- O C: >� O v O C O- C °*'' > +�+ c U — O a v m Oa �' ' m O v c �' ;° m N c O v •u o Q v 0 0 E o m aco o E a Y (6 D Y > Q Y E Ym c) c Y Ln N o fN6 N Y n 3 O O a a a fl c c -0 °o — a v Ln v - -a v o Q) E E Q 3 o m c a0 u m U b.0 0 o a m a 0 3 u m Y H v o U L O O 4j 3: L d U EAd d N C N O O CL U io r c v CL s 7 a0 c a ii C7 tm i i i i E 7 lG a 0 0 0 0 O v v m d � a a � a a Q .� c a s E D mo m m m > O m m L L L L C U L L E U I U U U w w U U 7 N N N Gl Q Q EO 0 C N O •y E c mO U0 �n O 'n r > N Q O E f�6 N f�6 N p O 0 O N :+' E CL O c _ E V (D > U > N > o U 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-87 Att A Page 345 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) Q) c a, a, d t v v O N N N 00 N N M M O r6 M M N u 0) aJ aJ aJ N O O L C C C Q Q) Q) Q) N E E E d E E E i O O O O Qj E O O O CL N N C O O O 41 >_ >_ E O) 0 7 7 O O O C O C E !2 N N O 0j aJ aJ H E H t H t CL 00 L w Qj aJ u — C °) � aJ aJ o O N — N U t C O N L Qj — c LJ L Q L M O N O Q Qj L T UJ O N i O i U v U r0 •� C U -� O Q _T u aJ c 3 ° c i a E O ns _ aJ C n + + v 0 Q) .° o 0 00 >, LL 0 3 v W o QJ :z V O u 3 O N (� u N C - ) f6 N Q -a V `1 C O 00 a + .fl +aj ns ~ N c Q v i W Qj u m OU w C m *�' N v -0 f6 Ol O O Qj 0 L O N 7 O kn O Qj Co '� .O c ° o a •°' •3 a, Q ° o v a, o o v NN Qj m E +' m L E ns °c° •aj u Q ns O O ns rn L 3 ice, kn t 4 +' N +' E C Y Q ) L N > C a-+ vaji N c 1� U � I� U a Q O O UJ p O o ° a vNOQj >t E u °� N v v o ¢ E vQj x C O O v v v v Q) na, o v v � � U o L Q o c ° •0 v°J oN v U m v° m m ° ° v .0 a t � � E ° E a, E +� E c a aJ +� aJ a '— +� C +� +� u v + a0 a ' O v l a, Q °�° ° _ ° o ° m n3 0 o L L a o c Q c >,— Y •C c^-I f�6 `� N i Y L +�+ N f6 7 N f6 f6 Qj Qj y. +�.+ U 41 N C Q) ON v '0 O � 'C C +aj+ O 'U r, ++ U ++ N O �Qj , C Qj t OJ C —O ° E w — m o0 c +� > E N .° 0 3 � 'c °� o a n3 °c° C C t3 v va; v i o o ^ ° m O o o 00 f6 �6 `6 `�° ° �6 a°o > a a°o :° ° a°Jo QC v va; v 3 c �_ a, u N N •i N -i v E 'ao N U m O m U '_^ c U 0 Q � .vi �(A O - O O '� `�° � � a, Lv t ° � 3 Loa O E ++ "O N O N L U — 0 V) a' — U U 0- -Cu Q L U U L L O O _y 'n w L `n L d O OP Hdi�.. n � O d Q ' N n M R 7 Li Q Q Qj S Z 0CO V d n 0 n n mL a Q u Q Q E a p n3 n3 n3 E U V U U Vf L H ice+ > > f6 f6 d a, E =3 — — C E > o v a, a, M o -a -a Qj U 00 LL LL Ct E-88 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 346 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) v Q) Q) C v Ln Q) Ln 04 .E M ° a Q) m � 0) U O fl- u m + i n 0 v > N n c O +�+ f>6 C N 71 L Q) 0 O + C O Q c ) a>-•+ Q) O L ° + O U 5 E C a) m O m v c _ uo- H L O c :a O c U o 0 a) D o m 0 E a °o a U c v v v w a) = i N 0 N E !2 > O T E O O N u t v Q) E +J Q) .+, O 73 Q ate-+ U +U+ 7 Q Q) O Q) N ++ N c L10 0 N O ++ O Q U U O ate-+ N 'N •� Op m x u McSao o 0 0 v c v n o O a m O v L +, a LL v O u o -0 E .� u ° v ° O b.0 u b.0c V) O 0 M N O — E E v bD c O o m ° m E - E c +� v n -r m m o c=° c E o v v E v �, E E o C aco " E E '0 ° E 0 m y Q) v °) O E bD +, +, oo u a C Q 0 v c o v v v '� ° a Q) +� ° v Q) o V 0 aco c v ° c v E o °�' o �° v o ° v) - m -0 t .> vi M O c m c c N c E m � O m O i m a✓ M bD °c° .� v u o E u o ° v ° 3 -a v ao x E c o •Q v ao `° v o � v u Q) •+� Q) `° `° u ai '+6 °) aco 'E a°o u u '— E N 0 Q E � m M-0 m c � � a o E � Q c u - u N Y aco a c L Q) c c v E m m Q) ;+- v E a a - E m e c +, 0 0 0 v v � v m = E v E E u +� i ao 0 3 E v > M m c �, O ) E x v v 0 � O m v v n o N -a 00 0 •c ?) m +J _ +-+ H +J m H 'O N i V) U H u ,n '0 �,• ~ >, E -, c � c M v c - c v O O r° v 00 v N c+ +� c '+� E m G +� io ,"i u m c c u fl v c o U E U G a E O E Q a v �' ° ° .E 2 .E in ° a U° .0 v L O O L _ x L d Q) Ql 110 U ^ Q C. + v o E a R 7Z O - m a +� Qj v V ^ c ~ >, of v o m ap` a ,� E E U U v) U° E Vf L H C ice+ C N w — N 7 — E _ o °a o Gl V U N > 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-89 Att A Page 347 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Q) O ° o v Q) ;� v 0) .O v M v M 0 — o � U M (V > L -0 of Y "O L of O Q) of of E 7 N 0 ~ -0 U ~ o } p L c a ro v Q N Q) E00 -20E N E EE E i O p '� O O O U 0 U U U G i 0 U C 7 0C 7 7 w E O m L L O a O Q 7 >, N Q Q) of >, 0 6 >, L Q) C: C O -r- L O ,� o o m w N t 0 O 0 ' n E c in E ° of -oa ° v O ° N o 'O 0 -0 ^ of u c '> u 0 0 ro t U U t .0 7 Q Q) "0 = C00 0 �O vi n .� of � 0 14 �n Q) v ns ns 00 00 C O O O C o0 N L 7 Q) N w Z5 -0 "a O 0 > 00 Q O O O 01 L -0 u a °� > m �, 3 u u v O .� o v o 0 o a a, F > c O n d � � v m Q O E v >' >, ° •c_ — L ago � � u o -0 -a Z5 E � > L E E '- E - > °0 0- � o v c E •+ E v U- - nu, c a0 +� Om y o Q v° a, L ago m v o o s u o .a 6- o v ° m L V 0 Q) o � E � 0 0 0 � o � � a, � a � � s � a = a Q) �n tn C -O +-� U 0 +-� of `� u O � Q, Q, O f6 — ++ O C U f6 O �n — a+ O 'r3 a Z: �, �, +J f6 .0 U E Y °� a o o v o •o o a n� v o� o 1 E a, E v ° v U 3 m ° E o j -r3 v a v a °J f6 E v .E m m o ° ° v a c o ° Q o a a n s o v v E - m y o o m a O w o m `° L O > •`-L° c o •� > 00 > v o :*' :*' .`-' o o 4 u o o Sao u E L o *' v u v u v C - > L c E L a i n, o `� �i c c -r C m a, a, ° v c w w E o 0 0 ° a, n° ° E v m E m � v � 3 ii L L � o 2 a -0 v o -0 Q U u o v +� L 0 0 CoY w L � L d � � ice+ � L Q. CL S3 o\o Z Qj mi d 0-= C C E a D E ns O =3 v v E v a o 0 `n Q Q C 0 5 w of of > O L f6 f6 E V) a > c +� C U o p ns v O O CL a, V a U Q N N E-90 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 348 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N 0) t d +' N O p L C Q �C E L O 0 Q L w E O Q L w Q E E a o -- u C u � � H CL +, O +� u 00 O 00 u n O >z"O u ^ E m O C: O L +0-+ h0 N "O f0 N ti0 +0.+ N 7 N U U 'n •� V O L f6 U C E ` N C N — c�c h0 vii •C N +J v fp •C L +' f0 G C f6 O f6 N �n c �n N f6 in �J fl- N C +-+ y. pip-O E 0 00 > C -0 Q ro a) +' N "O v - O O O fl' u .p Q) 0 "O O O L N L N N C u O .� f6 +�-+ N +0-+ > O N `� Q N N N 00 �n +-+ f6 f6 +J 0 E a C m C U N O v N •> 0O O O O �1 O CO CO � N h0 0 N �j 00 . -O +�+ N Q O N f>6 +J N O C `� O U 2 -0 +-+ +-+ O N N aL+ Y N 7 .v O C f0 "a M M E E "O Q O N .0 v C 0 c o 3 0 E m v o v -LU> •O m O E c oo v 0 N o o ° a L V v — N +-+ Q N � +'Q) V �n .� U — >, --+ Ou N i u N C .0 f�6 •V v �n f6 f6 C C L � •V u N i f6 C u •o N E ( f6 f6 u y, E N +�.+ 00 > N Q ON N O 00 O ,n a0 v 3 - ,i o 'E o c_ H O f6 E o E v E v w v O41 Q) ~ arz gog v a �' E4 'n E c �' a am ac as E CO y o `�' v 3 o *' o .Fu v o o v tw � m E E E p C O W N E .� L3) Qj v N N 00 n N u _ _ f6 0 +° E ro ro N ro � v —°J„ a E = a) v • • • • • ° =' ° aoE u -'a L 0 0 Y 3 w L 'n L d Q. M M y v V Z � - d m ' � a v E a 0 C: Q) E � ice+ f6 C > i C E u v C M O a o v a V E m Q 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-91 Att A Page 349 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O Q) L � 00 d C o o O o0 0 O .� c N — > O N p N O u• C p L C m CL N E v) a E O 6 i Ou m O 0) O O � w E O OJ m Q --+ � i C 0 r- E On E a > °�° v u c v C • N O .0 CL 00 a C N a� � m N m O C +�+ E Q +Q) 00 E Q) U -0 C L N U L O) OJ N + _ 3 m > a c °u a0 v m u a C: o 0 0 C u -0 > •i OJ ° C W OJ O f6 C fl- "O C `� •+� u •°0 .� oho � v v E o o v v o °; a°o o '� L O) m O U N +�.+ �, L fl- ate-+ i ° C a-+ W — E U u a i v u C o +� > .� aJ o two C C UO .0 _ •u u N i O fl .� 0 4; in 0 — '� N d v v o a, ° a ° •° O v ) v ) m .E a0- -0 L E v U CO +' •aL+ U +m+ O +J 0 > h0 v C oLNm C C ++ m O OJ 0 p Q NE O > Cr- 0 O> OJ O OJ ° aC "OC OLoOo OJC O - OJ m U L -a U O O O COJ 0 O OJ >� — CU "0 .OJOOO O •C m C E Q OJ E U C L O "0 O C L •> Q > m 7 "° }' > Oo L O v �' '� o v °; Y ~ E u C 'n0 v E v o .� m m m E m m V) u Q) c 3 ao v m >, m +� •— cn O m U C a a, — E -°a L° m v .�LU N E C �_ v v v ° m °J o f6 m m •u EA — u ° o ao > 0 � � C m aJ - -° m a, m m m ° ° w '� E E ao ° -° o c o v E c 'ao c vi o :° o � a°o m m v o C 0LU E °� -0 vi - u O m m U Y a E ° vo o v° � Uo � -0 o > � 0 .f6 E O � C o O oo u -0 • • • • U l m a; UC O ou Q N � .5m0mC � � � '� vm L O O _y Y � •iS L � L d H d J3 Q. W M 3 y v V Z � — d m ' tea v E a 0 C: Q) E Vf L H Q) r C +� .0 Gl d C > •y E O OJ O 0 Uao m M EA V Y E-92 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-july 2018 Att A Page 350 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 o.0 U L Q U C v (J u N >? CF) C f6 O N C +� > O N r° L a) a O -0 a� L Q) c ° ° L C f6 f6 OU O.w v '° O a' O O 0 C o 6 a o N O a E O '+, v Q > Om N L N E w O N C (� U N E E a , E E o E L o u O v .0 H v ro 2 CL 00 °p +� ° ° C M — N Q N U C L >, "° C Y L C N C C 0 C C N ro O+ �7 ro — N L L O m0 0 o °x' - o m ° n c .E U L L N ;6 U v c >? ++ N C vi N �n ry N O O 7 N C C N w Q O Q Ufl- I v ago v - v ni f6 v > v u a '� +� v Q x C v 00 +N N Q LO L >, O f6 L d p > M C O M M L N C N O Q > j * -C° L N ° ++ iJ N U fL6 °' c-I �vUi N LO ON v N L *' .0 m O c ° v m a0 = °�' v a; ° > > `L° °�° v m O v C L *' U v C d au+ N -° C C Z fL6 C Y fm I� +-+ ) fL6 L Q .� b.0 �J i � .— 0 E Q) L J-5 Oa00 OE Q N r -° — +te - E LC U O � O ry C O pi 70u >, Q) v p � v jj OO v O O Ov v ° +°O O -a J -=am >, • v v v v v E o C o V1 Q, +� v Q) 7 N fC6 C C C +U.+ �' N m OU Y N �' Q 0 "O C O C �n U �n *' 7 O M — �n E •— f6 f6 Y U N d +-+ E L C O .�N > >? O ry N C f6 -° Y v o v •C o4 0 w E °�' w o N v v v v a o -°_ > •° v >, m O +-+ +-+ N Y U O C CO O m N •ate-+ M O N C "O � E o .- n o M M t :} +� 3 v ory o E c o E cn m c v N � 0- E E M a � B a a C 3 *' v v f° — v v E � o v o a v u - m c v N m E •o E o m c U M Q) -a O o U m a✓ v m 3 m m C O C C m ' E > E > ° °; v v O •� o +' � •� v m v L O L O v v U v Q O m v v C m C v o C o v E • C L • C Q E >. U U Q U 3 — O L v) U E C O -a m L O U Y — 2 a0 +J L O 0 _y Y 3 w L H L d Qj Q. CL 3 y v m Z � — d m ' tea v E a 0 C Q) E Vf L H r ��.. C � w d 7 7A E C O C v Q a V m 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-93 Att A Page 351 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 L70 U � Q U C Q) U u N Q CF) C M 0 Q) OC +� > N n3 Q) a� a o -0 Q) d t a t v c ° fl OCL L C C f6 f6 U UU O N N E E d L E >_ C ° o 6 0 0 C 0 0 m a o w E o o 'Z, Q) L Ln C C 7 7 ) X E a ° ° E E O E ° u O ° v � H H v n3 = CL +� e0 0 0 Q) u ° 0 0 m L C -0 C -r- Q) Q) ° CD 0 00 "° "° of v 7 U f0 Q) L C i CL —hT0 U > V u v > � Q Q' O aJ >, > C t0 'O Z N CO +L' O C UJ W w of W 0 m a.., 0 O to O Vi C f0 -° 2+ U t U -° c N +J +-+ C — C f0 aJ O L E aJ L -° f0 f0 }, +� to C of +� U L i oUi m U C U E N O T o 7 C f6 o>i UJ UJ 00 N `.� (U6 0� aJ U Q) C > C U O 7 +C+ Q) CL Q) Y C v aJ iT Q tw— > +�-+ -LU0 Q) x +U., O U �_ 'U aJ +�-+ O C m > +, U +, Ln 0- v C C C • M .- > e0 aJ �' 0 L u C u n3 >Fu Q) o �o a, m ° Ln o C �o t o a, C m C C Q j CO '^ .� U -� C 0 C >' v Q) .— tYo p t0 t0 0 •� t0 QJ �p O +J +J ._ ro a, O C Q +� +� vi t O O '� 0 -° — U U a-+ Q— O U 7 t C to 7 C +� C L i Q n3 *' ° > O Q- T O ^ > E C C U 0 0 E W 0 i v� > O O N C O "O -° -° aJ Q Q) iJ O 0 m m -0 -° > O N E 0 w +' aJ > L U L +� L +, C O V "° +.+ i Q" E L >, +� 4J •SO f0 C m aj L L "° N C E •+� U a t Q) Q .� = C 0 ^ > vC O t hC0 O U a p Q .Q 0 p 'O V O v 3 a, � v L aJ L +� Y +� ro aJ +� Q a, C U - u o C �, v m a, ao t a E a, w ^ � o v C C a, a, w m y b.0 N v a E E Q E +� ^ O E C t 10 L +� U to C n L L aJ "° - � 'i +�+ t °� > > U -° O •S2 f0 i ate+ t aJ ar > n 0 0 a, +� a, T o Q u ro 0 �, E aJ +J +>� yC, hp O — Q .0 Q) -° C T vUi -0 aJ Q) hU0 u u c 'u •��— 0 0 'E L o Q) u +� E a u v D u o 'ro E -0 E Q}' " v v a0 °C° o a, a o v f 0 v a N o N `° E 0- Fu u Q 5 E u v a .E v a Q t > o 0 3 LU v o L O O � L d Q. CL S 3 y v V Z � — d mi d v v E d p C C Q) Q) E H L H r ice+ r C CL ° O -a G l V LL Y E-94 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 352 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 v v C oo v u a, — v .� ° a; ° v o Y ago .� .� 'Q o co c aJ aJ v v > — v '� Q) aJ c O m m 0 u 3 m > u m m '+—, H: w o °�' `�° o 0 0 0 a v '� o u u v E o "a a, +� v 0 o n3 n3 M ,� a, >, c M N *' v E .E N C ~ v� L f6 C O O Q 000 .— .0 C M O N n O + N � O N f6 4+ N .N u O .� L +�+ C U N v L u — L L N C f6 u E 7 — f6 N � N O vi w m u w 2 •� N N 0 O N "O Q u � — N U O 'i M '— 1 -O O c +J �, a a a m E u > o Q) Q) u U a, u .� 0 C L c E n3 v c +� n3 a o o v +' fl a, a, � Y v C. a, O a, � E `° —' v n3 ao > u E - L O fl u N CD E u u a, > m v m -0 = E N N O oa f6 0 ~ E 0, o 00 v -0 E v v u v c v ao�_ v M v > a, � °c° v a " a a E o °° �' a0o o.2 0 v ° > °0 'a 0�' _ o 0u' E CL > m o o N c a, a a, 0 v v o O E c o E v m e a o 3 v v a .� w v o v ao o ago Q) L E a>+ E •0 ++ E Op �'' n n3 ate+ �n f6 0 " m — f6 .0 C N 7 N f6 of O f6 _ — — f0 O L N >' Q '� O 'O O Ou Q *' O O cm •N 'n "O �, 'n O N ON N vl V f0 O u C C N f6 'n •00 Q f6 m u - O .� V ' u fN6 N O — i > C •L N i E �' O C }' O *' O "0 .0 .E E Y u a a s u a, a ou E '� ° V) 0 E v c O 7 CL Q) 00 N O dJ to dJ "a No .� O a� a� +� O) i N L N N o v L _O O t O dJ O O v *' 0 f6 u Op +: Q c E o v oE m O L — .> ,-, o Ln o LO 00 a, u u .� +, t a, O -0 o O a, -r- a, Q E Q 0 'E m m m c +� o a E c c a, v a o 0+' c t. ro a, > m a, a, 0 .x E o U O c m r0 T E o 0 o v 0 v c N E u > a, u > n3 ° o a, a, L u E o = v o - v v a > 00 E •Q v +� 0 aJ N aJv o 0 a c C aJ N aJ t L O ro a, O •— N 0 0 0 •L () E t 0 +, 0 m a 0 •E v 0 � w O ua, +� ua, o . m C: -r- w 3 w O O E o C -0 u o N v ° 3 C: u D- amu, 0 o t o v o m •- c c 0 � a s o E u +, a, 0 L L a, a, � .0 o ° 0 of -O > dJ O dJ r6 +� O N O E o o L aJ o a b e0 � N E `—' u v 0 v 3 °' t o aTo aJ v M a � o GaJ ro oN oN u c Q v v v 0 = Q L 0 � v O o E — 1 m oo +, o t o f0 a, ° L a, a, -0 a, m a, u .E c E a a H U ° a° m .E u ° v H °0 v -0 00 L 0 0 Y � 0iS L � L d C. CL S 3 y v V Z 0C — d m a' � a v v v E p c c c Q) a, a, E r �+ -0 -0 -0 w d E E E 7A J J J r E 0 CL c 41 V Y Y Y 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-95 Att A Page 353 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 va c 00 r, c o ° v v TI L N > Q) O C 0 OLUOO L >O C C U C aJ v m .� a U C m O a C O =3 _r_ !2 � >, o C .T -0 +' +�-' N 000 O Q) 0vi ; > - O - � ° CO O0 O N U U U o a; ° m o a, .� .c o C O m o m N 3 N CO v u O O Q O N E o 0 6 �O OU N Q O O L .� •++ m O C O f�6 U N yam,, .�_'' O C N N z +O+ 0 m - .S'O O N U N O m v C W v t C aao bD N E - '� t 00 u o � Q aJ C OL -Cu v a v ° c .+� v M3 .0 = m O O.42 0 3 u °' o !, C u m o o v o v ao a C °' H ° �' = N C o C o o v 'Q) 0- v U v ° m a 00 O v aJ v a °J ° 0p > c v •� v 00 ° o O -0a m v v v o o M -0 .2 M aJ o 0 > u u v v °J ° a 0 °) C = c o ~ a m a v m aJ o u v c u H > x v Q N v v aJ o v �' o > CL 7 — Q Q � U C i d O N C0 V Gl +�+ m C -O O 0 ++ E -° *' O N O C N N a — C — — 00 a C7 a O 3 aJ o °; E d v 00-0 °; m m aao :°; v m E : u m - �° Sao .� > 4 c a, c� a C - +� u o v U u ' v o ° c E ° u 0 ao a, O E �, O 3 Sao " E aJ 00 E - Q) - . m O a u O U m ._ v `-' °� v m v o m C v ° v m C a o ° o ma u v 7 m L U Q L U LL U +� u U H +� > w Q m m O U m H .S Q 7 M00 O 14 000 C •f6 ° O N o 0p —' n N 0p ON O 3 -O - _r_ �' --2 O 0p L O "a ++ U fl- 7 E L ++ �. Ln 6 U m O Q m O "O >= c m i 0 m e m m 3 aJ C 3 - _ c v o -0 U O N L L C m +-+ C L N i E i -0 ate-+ N N N tjo C: am+ •O m 0p 0 E m � "a CO O ?j m m C v C C m +' O 0p O N E — +-+ N m N m N -a m N C � Q) -aO -r- C i"a "O N C tio 000 d c u tw m -0 aJ c *) C a0o M N O c *' aJ U0 Y v '� v bD =3 .m o a, m c c 3 v c N � = o V •m O 0 a' N° c a) v o 0a E m °�° *' o f 6 E -a � � O -a 3 c m aJ - aJ U LL +2 0 � m yc, v' •v m m 0 +� E au .mttC7 o- Q) ° o � aio °J U E a m u v E v a v OL ' ° m 0J m 3 � 0 O U C E C C O v � N ao 3 ao m O :, a E N Q u C vv a v m E a a a, Q) C � m a � `-° � O Q) a 'v c o f ao v o U E 0 0 a O o Q 0 ° 3 a E m a 0 3 0 L 0 0 Y � 0iS L � L d Q. CL 3 y v m Z � — d m a' � a v v v E p C C C Q) v v E C �+ -0 -0 -0 w d E E E 7A J J J C E 0 CL O QJ V Y Y Y E-96 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 354 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 n 0 o °) m m C o v o 0- o o CF) O a E :� a v C U m m -° _r_ -I-- > m m c o v o E > Q o u v �, C v v o m o N � C m L n O c-I C � � m >- L N — L �n +' E L -O M W �n N do v U m `� Q) ,n O Q U p O .0 ti0 O U aO+ •m O m O U N "O •� �n N U n Op a� Opp fN6 C 'v>—i N >� N N C m C O C N �n C •a0-+ .0 �' — N >, m O �J N `� N vCi f6 C +�.+ U +�.+ C U -U �' C ° m C > � Ew >� N o v m v ° O v a ° m m Q v O E r L w O > 'O N O N Q Q t O "O `� t U v Op O o v v a; m o v o N > v 0 ° O Q o E °N° v 'Sr- m =0 To: = -° E O v .E O.� � C C V v — ao �' m O N — - m o n is E o d ` o o 3 a o v v C °�' m o `° •� `° ao= O 0 o v U a. y v a m m m a — v C: -r- O m n Q 3 v .a v 3 v N N "O N a *O C N N O m v _ ° W .� _ � v C 0- C o °�' °�' o o v E E E o °J o .N v v CL 0 m N 2 N a r� N ° 'O O N L h0 C O E N ++ ate-+ U C +� U 41 C fl O oo .E v E v E a '+� +� +� 0 m ° v a m fl m +� o o C C +-+ O w c-I C -0 �n +-+ U L U m N o EL ° > '++ L U 0- E L Q -o fN6 110 `° 7 `° 0 U +_+ E co - - v +� O v C `° o = > C c ° v m v 0 3 E d v 'Q `° a a a c *' +� = ao m v o v m ' �, �, v oo v W c 0 •� u — ao— v +� — m m m N > M Q) -1-- Q N 0 C +° 'n Q t 7 7 N C 7 vii X t N O .0 — 2 U N "O +J 0- i O U O U +J "O H V) "O �n U U �n Q N m N H i Q 7 CL 00 +J n C 0 C Q U OUO N N O u N O *' �' O .� 0 7 v m DO Op C 'i U N m -O L C o 0- C N E m C m L O m O N O -0 C C •v' "0 m I > E °p v 3 0 3 > o > m C m °) 0 -r00 L U N �, — 0 w . E o v m n m v v .E c o v o - v v v m v 3 c t. v x v U c 0- .+� ° o u N m a�0-+ u N -0 O 'j C L `�° ° v > >' E O .E m -° o = 00 LN v v = c 0 0 E U o U C >' O O N Q — — "O O n g v 'o m C N U +-+ UC m E Ln L m > m E N ++ C U U C ++ "O EA o v u 3 o 0- o v 0 v o 0 c - v E m aQ n O C v 3 +, E a °�' v ° o `�° � n °�' ° C o o m o v 0 ° *' v ai oo C > U a c v 0 ma v o C E o m ,� C O O m v N N OCO •a-+ N E -° i C C N -0 C -0 0 N > E 3 m m ° v � v o m +� v 0 o C C '" H O m +J m U `� +J U �n C m U m a H a� L 0 0 Y 3 w L 'n L d H d Q. M S y v V Z � — d m a' � a v v v v E p C C C C E r �+ -0 -0 -0 -0 w d E E E E 7A J J J J r 0 CL O Ol V Y Y Y Y 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 355 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 a, > " o L70 a, a, L70 E a0 -0 o C n C N U o L70 C o E v O _ E U C o - Y L10 •— C O O' M N UO N — +J N V 7 N C O fL6 7 �n N N C L ,� L f6 f6 U >� N O — `� N a-+ N L N - �n .0 O f6 — V > U _ }' m � a-+ i C C L U C f6 "a "a >, m f6 .— Q f6 M a-+ �_ yU. '� d L U O aU+ +m.+ Ln -a -a ++ U '0 O U U v 7 E -a O U N n L (� f6 O f6 N 'n O L "O C C f�6 '� 4 O N }, C 00 C E O 4(+ V) *' J f6 N v n3 + c :a U O C n3 E E E E v a, U C � a0 o a, U E o c o L E f6 N 7 N .0 • U f6 �' U iJ U U U O hC0 �' C > +' Q ++ O f6 L U ++ L L C ++ L L ++ C f6 N L C L '�, Q Q N O H d N �n f6 U N Q U C .0 U O 'L 00 `:� N "O O m i O C +' n N L N U U N C V •C � O N L O L C L L N O L f6 C E L N N C O O N +' fl N N *' Y N L L —u N > U L v U a a� +, m a, U E m a E O a 5 .— =a C v C m N N rn U U Q �' N -0 X O ~ N Q L bo N O � -0 -O - 7 -O d E 6 a mV — 4m a, a, L70 U a, +� a, a_ L L70 °; °; v N > °; a, o v ao v o o a� L70 a s v E E .Q •7, v LOl .71 +° u u 3 +, a °� a C E m Vi E w> a ago v Q) o v u U v E u L v L c uo -a m v E n3 — v v o ° u L70 O C m n3 o m c E O i N —vO O m , C N U N N O .� .N N OCO= G — N (0 L -a L N >� Q O — "O a� O O N N L N .N i E E !2 + + Vl U f6 00 0- C f6 C U - f6 N f6 -r N O f6 L a N V N �n "t3 `.�u Q) .v Q N �vOi r6 O C O .E > M M Q) o v .E � E a o E :u o v o E v S o � o v t C w O o w O a > +� n aJ ca, N u N v EO y0. r6 n ON N N L O E 2 a� N L 0 •E i E x m U v m O a o f O z > E C U O w a, ° Lw E E Qt Q U O .E •C O m N C ' L -O +-' >' Q U U O N +-+ N f6 U N E �n ++ OO -O ro "O O o0 •� E _ L j L •� +L-' O U O fC6 N N 00 O E +-+ E N C f+ N L L Q) N +O-+ m C N .� C ++ N O N U +' u �n C U U 7 L — O E >, N f6 C L °J E .E a, M - E 0— a, a, E w O E 0J n3 C E C p a o O N S > o v v — U C - -0 aJ � n — -0 7 N U M V1 N > > "O >` 'O N ate-+ m � C � O > � Q) � � M M E Op L f6 .O +N.+ •N C f6 "O N m 7 E V) n E O N 'a "a m O C •U M N "a f6 .ice L N 0 0J f6 a 0i �a Q .0 M o C O r6 U U >. N L10 L U i 7 C U ++ o E m m m •E o °) o o u u E °o °) -a H ao E Nu .E -0 0+' v 3 a, a, a, u 3 v ,OJn -0 n aio • • • E 0 0 _ U -a `0 0 Y � •iS L � L d Q. CL S 3 y v V Z � - d m a' � a v v v p C C C Q) a, a, E r �+ -0 -0 -0 w d E E E 7A J J J r 0 CL O QJ V Y Y Y E-98 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 356 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 U O U O N .� C 00 L N C ++ a-+ E L m fl- L aO+ �n "° Q N N 1100_° N L >= U Q — L N a-+ N N E m m V1 EL - N N ° `- C -r C > N N C �n N N .— +-+ 2 v - - LL N .� N E "O "j "O +0+ =a N N u m ° v O u O u m +, a E d C v E v ° � v p c r Q) U v O L +� +, -0 •Q C v v m O a "M v C a _ O. v v m o > v +� E +� c v' ° E � °' o L ° v °Ja aio m y °' E m ° '� o U m .O C "a U OO. O E •U m N m L O t •y C L o- — C U C •� 0 N C E no Q 7 U a0+ "° N C aO+ ON Op f6 Q W o- a-+ fl-L N — > C o f E m c a - o o n - o c E C v vi v � v ° °a p m C n 0 0 7 E d � m c v v m m x c > v v O v o u o v a o v ° `° v � v c u Z U U Z H +� a +� L r- w H M 0 0 N — o0 0 0 o v ° E N m C •� "O O N N _ 0 V i DO u u Q O o +�-� +�-� N io u `� •u u o u o C v U C: E a � N — a -a E +� m m y U o m O c v o m v °�' v o I vLIO o o � 'v E n v o E .- E E m o 00 — O m >� ~ U 0 C ni N yU ° m N + n Q u v C O v f 6 = m cn H E m L ° v m Q) 3 E o C ° '� O E •� ° m v > ) m E > v a U m c � ' m � vZ E 'er � — O — o >� o � .E � -° C N "O O u m C C m — C 0 '° +L+ m ou u o v m ago v v w Q ° v v C C E u n o " v °' o a C N v v v E E C V m o o E o o C v m — o v C f6 O m Q C O C ++ 0 U L 0 r- Q m C 'h0 0 0 ° ° '� U ° -0 Q) - c v ago o u o m .2 o E NX _° fN6 C N Y N N C fC6 LL m m N C N C v ° tio v v c m -aa 0 S9 o a E m e v E C > O E Co — cm fl- N `� ai C Q `n ° � O ;� 0 +-' m f 6 ° - N Q Q E v O o v a 0 °C° T v v — o ° °- . :� -° m U m > v a) E *' m > v ° o — O m m � O O -0 oo -° 0 o E � o > -0 E � E � cin � cin v° c � C7 f6 w .0 � .E v L 0 0 Y � •iS L � L d Q. W S 3 y v V Z � — d of ro ro ro ro ro ma' � a v v v v v p C C C C C E r �+ -0 -0 -0 -0 w d E E E E VfE J J J J m N 0 E L L L L M O CL O v O 0C 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 E-99 Att A Page 357 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c 03 a rn 0 N N d � N O 0 C C Q Q) Q) N E E d E E i O O O w E o 0 CL 7 C O O O E O) 7 7 u C C u � � � H H CL p v Q) 00 Q) Q) m O c n3 O aJ O N O N C E Q) °� a, E > ) E +° O a c 3 0 ao 00 a _ +� C C U > C O Q) +� Q) C �, � ._ � v a ns °; o v r o v O u m 0 m .E o u m o w C Q) _o W n = o � 3 _0 a ; ago •� � 'o a ) p � .- cn o `�° a _ v m o v C v o a °�' a E v 06 0 -Oa o - v I a, + v o -0 " U c N - Q) o 00 U a Q) U a c o � E n3 N c 00 N aJ aJ Op Q — .0 u C + N >? Qj N N i O i O Q) W E - O E O O o0 = Q) �� O s > E m - C 5 O m ° N ° O N o 0 1100 .0 C ° U >' L v) N f6 � - � 0 tW C Q) o > > m u Ln E u C �_ +� u = 3 > v �' E C C .x o0 C C c o m a — a, a, a, Q E o v •c v O ° > a, o f a; o E m L C aJ �n C L aJ .> N -O Op aJ -O L O bD ) �n fE6 Q) m O 0 O O U Q) L 7 O v N Q --' C - "O v i m OCO C m N hC0 C 0 a� Op N C Q) fC: Q W C +.+ �'' o .0 Q ) Co L - +Q, Q"O "O "O L Q) O •— 'i V N C O Q -O •2 - - - O O N >, O E ++ v aJ n5 j, 00 i U U aJ L Q) �' f6 ' N — ++ 'a 7 - aJ N C VI -a aJ — O � O f6 Q L Q C a-+ f6 ++ O ate+ VI o v m L1 a; `�° o ago ) a E m E o � n O u 41 C O Op -O N N C +.+ C �., C O N �, O O- O +.+ 7 Q aJ Op Q L E a, E E o '0 u vO) o c a' O Q' E o E '� O v -0 a 7 c n u v a, O o Y 3 Q) +� o v v °c° C ° Q, f 6 f 6 Y a a, C �� Y OC— a O 3: 'C U aJ C 6aC Qj E m °; a.0 -a +° C �' - - v v .- m a -a °' o E c Q) ago o O E ' o n3 0 3 o `n Oa o v o v Q o v v 0- E +� ; E a c Q' > o Co v a Q' a0 0 Qom' v c ?' E a E `° �' v o m u v '- u � v v ° u ., w v - -0 ao m .v o E a '- > 2 O t .� v •> n3 O n3 .� n3 H N a vui N n3 a0 � .L m O O _y Y 3 w L 'n L d Q. CL 3 y v m Z � — d mi d v v d p C C Q) Q) E �n Q rn 5 r i0+ C Q) E N C O 0 aUO 0 J O o EA Q 41 V G Co N E-100 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 358 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 c c� a rn 0 N N d � N O C +J O L C.w d � L w E Q 41 41 C w E a o -- u u CL N v N u bD Op +�-+ �J OCO N N N O �n f�6 L v U CO .N ate-+ N N ate-+ N U N m m ++ Q O 0- N f6 mL m N "o C no - -r- -r- UQ) O m � U U N C j N '� C h00 ++ U C M m m ++ U O U N Q) m �, C N .� ate+ 7 N "a >�"a 4 'N � > N 16 L m U U L C C N LL N •L N ++ M — M O C m "O N + i N 7 f6 C f+ N "O "O > O m -O > O H `� Q �_ O �_ L u C >` O m m O N .Ln N N vOi Op N >' .0 O v X N X m m Op-O O L v v m - v O v N Y N n 3 a, v c o 3 ago E > Lu -a - E - E O m �, O O — O � N — u N a0 N � O O C O io m fl- aJ O Q t Q O v 2 pp m v = •� .E C u v U > U C '_ v U0 +� v C m o aJ +� m :+� v O a, - +� > a a m y > a a +� +, 'O iJ N U = U N +' 0 m m -O C v "O C Y Q C X N m O X vi U 0 m Q) O vCi N N O +' > +.+ m }, "O U O L +.+ N -O +�.+ E +� vi U O N N N vi N m L N +J m n C OU M •U U o _ m v m '� v +� v a, E ao *' °c° c v mtio v m O o m Fu C m a - v v m v ° v o v o a0o u o ° o o a °� o .0 ar m > o a o a = v > o u a m v a c v C N m C o g m > U v O C E o m v = +9 U m fl m v v m a m �' 00 +� > o c ° u o ago cn " 0 a; 00 ° E `° O > C E n O o 2 u '�_ o 0-u' .0 m u n a; °; .v .� j a; o 00 v v v a m > ° a, Q) - .� v C o E 00 •E � u > n n U U O Q) C v m o U iE � �, v O � v o o m L N i i fl- i U H �n U Q U N Op U v "O "O vCi (U6 ate+ Om0 U L 0 0 _y � L d C. W S 3 y v V Z � — d m ' tea v a 0 C:E Q) E Vf L H C ice+ C N � d � m Eo C E 0 0 -r- CL o Y V N > 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-101 Att A Page 359 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 ao v Q; �. Q) c u o m _ — m O Q) U C V a N M U m f6 = C > C L f6 0L .— 0 N Q) 0�-0 O Q O Q O C u ro N CO u y0 0 0 N O r0 +� c aj u n 0 0 O + Q r6 N .0 ro t Q) u Q) "O +' ro Q)N v > - O N O Q) Q— C C.w N C f�6 >_ f6 fl f�6 v N N E 0 f6 N Q) L ,n ,Q) +' d L E u c � Q) C: v v O C > v O f6 u v C U 0 O C Q) C >. N O i 0 •�, r6 v > r6 ,n 00 41 C i r6 Ou f6 '^ •0 r6 C u C -r- O m QCj O C N U N 0 � � -0 Q) +' �' 00 C f0 O O — Q N 0 !2 OU 0O 0b.0 -0 O Q M o o -o o o v Q) ♦— V) LL > O U m Vl "0 Vl E 7 Q L N N N UO Q 00 0 + c-I U a-+ C Q) L 0� N Q c o o +� E Q) ° o Q) Q) E _r_ c ° u C ° o v � oo 0 o vv - ° Q) O U° Q om o o > * �v . E U v °oo r I C fl- C O 'n C ° f�6 u M U N i X > L +J M +J C 00 00 O u j0 `� u O -0 'i ,� `� 0 +J L t6 u O O ) N - N i vl Q) 00 t O 0 .0 u "a U U N N 00 hC0 m C X C C N U O u m 'M"m . O u -0 LCL +0+ 7 0O a_+ E Q �' Q1 E f6 f6 p > 110 - N i >. +' f6 Q V N Y +N.+ *' 00 d M O i C N +�.+ '0 E 110 Q) Q f�6 �Fu M — U -0 0 cn — 3 Q) MaUo — f6 u .0 -° � L N E j3 -a E a u >,— v O — oo— . C v .° > C O v ar C v; O a u -0 > -r u .E > •° u °o °a m C u .2 u — Q m in U 0O 0- N 'v� ate+ `-+ N C >- ate+ .� p �° a0+ >. +�-+ f�6 > m O +0.+ i O 7 N Q C 7 00 vl u 0 O vi v C C v) "O "O N m vl f6 L N 7 f6 C H i C > N L f6 ?� O N N U' C > c c� v +� o > ao v E C E °J v u C 3 u m �_ u E C "O •U v 000 '� u O N O . m --+ m u E i O N •a0—+ '§ m Y N fm6 , i O v C � 0 C W m L O — u -0 u > m N L — ♦— U U v) Q "O >- - ♦— U U O N LL E n v v O 0 vi -0 L O u E +� > • • • m v v E > O m N +� L O O _y Y 3 L 'n L Q� C. CL 3 ar v m Z � — d f0 i d E ao E V1 L H r iC+ C C w d 7 C CL U ar E-102 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 360 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 O o m v a � a 0) v E o U N � O O N n d +�' N U N O t 0 L O C N v v C.w +Q) >_ 7 N E i O O > O U ON C 7 a 3 >. Q) yN -O .0 O E O > 7 E a Q) Q) 0 O -- v u p N C u � � .0 V) H CL +� C aJ v N v o 0 o v > v N u N O u dJ -O dJ Q) N C \ N O 0 r6 00 0 — — O O O U O O U N O N p O +' L7 O N .� 7 f�6 C C vl > "O U L "O ^ 00 m O O ++ m ,� � r E a L U •o U v o °�' o v c 3 - — v a v ° Ln E 0 O L J u > v 0 o ° •°0 E Q > } '� � w c o o a 0 w o o >' C a m O O O , , a v L �n O >, •— C m C m >, of C f0 Q U Co N O 0- Q L 'j f6 f6 vi ho 00 ,> m U ++ L "O O N 7 C -O +� v fL0 L T �- f6 N_ VI = N "O L .0 C i C t. C C H n — EV f0 c CJ .0 +� c C +' > °; v v � 3 0 W C 3 a o m C m o v 0 E v o o � > o v m u � � � � � •� c r u ° u � o � fl- d a0 v `�° a ° a 3 t v �° ao `° v `° N > m o ao uoQE av o L N O N O O � C -O U .� U >, U "O E U O _r_ N N O bD O i 110 "O Q U dJ W C i i dJ v h0 N '� N Op U — n r6 '^ O i U O n 'U N O fC6 fC6 *' N -O E CQ) c _ '� Y vvi +>' fN6 Y C N O N o i 'O N ° v m u E u ago 0 0 0 E c c v '� bD v LIO ° =� u n v — � cn — o O n O f6 U aO+ N v U NO O i Q i i f0 +�-+ U Q-O V v a C W Y ° Mv L a; o E E Q v L v m ;6 — °�,' m a amm c- i o ao o v 0- 0 *' E a a, � O m v � a°o Q 0 E '0 °; � a E u Q } n O +� o C M- v f0 OU U N C L f�6 U C .>_ w C C L E T O UJ ro '0 Ln H N --� ,O O O O ccC E-le i O M +' +' N �n G N f6 • f0 C f0 O O 'h0 Q '� t10 N f6 "O Q N O UO U o N N L 0 O L ro O > O > U +J v E Y cn ao a Ln o 3 H V) u v a a 1O a m 3 -0 3 a L O O _y Y 3 w L 'n L d H d Q. M M y v V Z � — d a1 ro m ' tea v E a 0 C: Q) E W E _ O c O c w d M •0 a E v v O +� Q) O +� CL C v Gl V V) Q cn 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 E-103 Att A Page 361 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 E o.0 .. 0 co a0 0 a a u v v 0) v -00 - 0_ _ •c O m U > N a v N v -0 O v N H i H O c m n c 0 L v t CL a) N M + N d E ° O E a E vE -p L Ov ate-+ .0 Ov J i 0 N i 0 w E O vu O Q > U V1 >, L C a L Q) C a ) O v O E E !2 ° N O O i 0 ro ao v O u C 1 n N u m U m y 7 H H +3 7 CL L O .moi .> V 0 N U N MN >'"a O u a.., 00 N f��6 f6 Q -a N O N f�6 -° 3 d E L 110 M 00 f6 ° v .c = c v a o- 0 O L > f6 �, U f6 N 'Z- f6 �O ° C "O U *' L O J O M O "O L f6 Q) � U C O Q •i 0 v J r6 Q -, O N �' i' p O U a0 O i v ro 0 O N +J m v - -O E v O v v m " 3 = c a v v v v ° 00 0 o m m O LL v O v e - > m c °° a E `° v ° 7 O o 'v0—i N ° G O N _0 C O Q U O X u w a�U'' OUZO V Q +�' —O 0 7 m C m u v v v t v 0 v v o 'S .— n a io .0 v 0m f6 v U ca a COJ Gl "0 O u +�+ = N O �n ++ m U N C O VI N N +L+ f6 U - U u .— = j - C: 41 f6 ++Q) E 'n N v C 0 C o Q) � O �O N +0.+ O N O f6 N ~ J Y r 0 ° N - m •� O +u =3m+ . ate-+ ate.., N >- '� 7 f6 f6 �' �- C �' "O N i V M Q N UO f6 O Vl N f6 c f6 "° N �n N f6 }, > "O t O O E "O p 'E aJ -O -0 O +�.+ ro E C N C o p Q) u o x m m v — o E — o c o E C O a� v N ° 0 r6 0- 0�0 >' =3 O - v � u v0i E u Ov "O O Y Y a� ro E n O +J O W M n - w � v v E � L 0 O a M N .E E a c o v es v v tw 0 U v c '>o E � v y • Yo o vv ' -r-a 2 E c c -0 ° m E .v m v ° v v v m v v c C o v a°o 0- v 0 v o o E v o E v � °� •N .v E w a E > n :W v C a N U v Q; E ° N m E v � v a m m o - ° U Q) m E — a cn a s U U - E v m U L 0 0 Y 3 Co L L d 0. a w S 3 O 2 Gl 0o Z LL J V ' � a v v E d p c c Q) v E �n Q H 5 r ��.. C N Qj d � r E 0E r6 a 0 0 41 V N Y E-104 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 362 Ordinance 18893 Updated Apm 9,mg § � p \ / _ 5 u E » / { 2 2 \ 2 e / } \ � Q) ■ o E 2 < / ® 0 U � � u \ CL f ) m /\ / � \ u o a = = # z § , / k \ � § \77 _ \ 4 } 3 ® { 2 2 ± 0 u E a \ & > E E ® ¥ u e 2 \ j \ } E E q = y ° = 2 o u u e a 2 2 a — ® \ E , » 2 \ o { « / Q) m \ 7 m = 7 E / / \ \ 7 G q « ; \{ 0 } Q) \ / / CO ) a I Q \ \ Q) 00 \u /\ / E\ ) _o[ , j2Q) \ % u§ , \ o / ® _ m ° ® g » 2 � jee { 7 ) ° s2 g £ � y u o G ® , § § \ a $ / E 7 0 \ § \ 4 § @ \vo 4 & _ \ E / F § > 0 § \ \ 2 / E / z x ® » _ ± -0 C: o ` k G m { / E ® \ \ \ * k / k \ 0% E E / 2 \ § § 2 § % E ® _ % E u 2 / / \ V 2 / § / / 41 / / § / e & & - j \ \ u » { ® _ = e » � o — ) \ _ K ) ? / Q ` u } E m a e \ 2 E o e & @ 0 ® = u = / @ o , 8 S ® 2 w t / / § / y 2 u E t > Q) ) e $ — o = @ u = o = E \ y ± / R } j u f / \ \ \ [ / a 2 § .■ k © � 3 \F � = z ± 3 ) / LU m Q) LU LU E G E e j � j � 3 E 2 \ § 0 § — o = ƒ } Q, / m@Comprehensive Solid Ws Management Plan-JZma 5555 &ttA a9 363 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Appendix Descriptions of DisposalOptions Considered Att A Page 364 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Options Considered for King County's Next Disposal Method The division used information on waste disposal options from the Conversion Technology Report (R.W. Beck 2007), the Waste-to-Energy Study(Normandeau 2017), and an updated Cedar Hills Site Development Alternatives Final Report (KCSWD 2017a) to identify three options to meet the county's disposal needs after currently permitted capacity at Cedar Hills is used. A long-term disposal method was selected from the following three options: • Further develop Cedar Hills, • Waste Export, and • Waste to Energy(Mass Burn)Facility. Further Develop Cedar Hills This option would further develop Cedar Hills to maximize disposal capacity, extending the county's 50-year practice of managing its waste locally.To account for emerging technologies, the next disposal method would not be specified, but criteria would be established for selecting the next disposal method.This option is consistent with county policy to maximize the life of the Cedar Hills landfill. The Conversion Technology Report (R.W. Beck 2007)and more recent division analysis concluded that Cedar Hills disposal is the most economical way to handle King County's waste. Other advantages include the division's experience in landfill operation, availability of space in a county-owned landfill with state of the art environmental controls,and collection of landfill gas to produce renewable energy. Challenges with this option include obtaining new or modified permits to authorize further development, relocating buildings to make room for refuse, and continuing to be good neighbors for the surrounding community. Features used in the re-evaluation of this option include: • New landfill cells would be developed at the Cedar Hills landfill, • The permit and the landfill would be modified to increase the height of the landfill from approximately 800 feet to 830 feet,to the extent that such modification would be consistent with the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement,which requires King County to make a good faith effort to keep the maximum height of areas 5,6,and 7 of the Landfill at or below 788 feet above sea level, • Division facilities currently located in areas permitted for refuse disposal would be moved, • High-efficiency collection systems would continue to deliver landfill gas to the Bio-Energy Washington facility, resulting in pipeline-quality natural gas,revenue for the division,and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, • The added capacity would be sufficient to handle the forecast tonnage,maximizing disposal capacity at the landfill, • Consistent with long-standing practice,new development would be financed through rate revenues managed in the landfill reserve fund, • As Cedar Hills reaches capacity,previously described evaluation criteria would be used to select the next disposal method,and • A new disposal method would need to be ready for service when the new capacity at Cedar Hills is exhausted. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 365 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste Export This option would export waste to an out-of-county landfill after currently permitted capacity at Cedar Hills is used in 2028. Current county policy establishes export to an out-of-county landfill as the choice for disposal after closure of the Cedar Hills landfill.Waste export by rail is a proven disposal option used by neighboring jurisdictions, including the City of Seattle and Snohomish County.There are several regional landfills available by rail with combined capacity sufficient to handle the county's waste in the long term. (Table 6-1)(KCSWD 2017c). This option would transfer a significant portion of the County's waste management activities into the private sector for long haul and landfilling. Challenges include modifying transfer stations for rail-ready transport, cost, lead time needed for contracting and division operational changes, and potential rail service disruptions that might arise from rail capacity constraints and weather events. Features of this option include: • The county would enter into a contract to export waste after current permitted capacity at Cedar Hills is used by 2028, • Waste would be exported to a yet-to-be determined out-of-county landfill, • The out-of-county landfill would produce energy from landfill gas using an efficient collection system, • The county would negotiate revenue sharing or energy credits with the out-of-county landfill for the county's share of waste that produces landfill gas that is then harvested for energy, • Waste would be transported to the out-of-county landfill by rail,the preferred transport mode, based on travel time, equipment requirements, payload,and capital costs(KCSWD 2017c), • The division would buy container-ready trailers to transport rented rail-ready containers from transfer stations to a rail intermodal facility, • The division would modify its transfer stations so that municipal solid waste can be loaded into railroad shipping containers, and • The division would contract for an intermodal facility to transfer containers from trucks to rail. F-Z 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2oz8 Att A Page 366 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Table 6-1. Potential locations for out-of-county landfill disposal LU 1.Columbia 12.8 MW gas- Ridge Landfill Gilliam Waste to-electricity; County, 325 354,275,000 329,000,000 1990 2150+ and Recycling OR Management plasma gasification Center demonstration plant. Allied Waste 2. Roosevelt Klickitat Industries 20MWgas-to- County, 330 electricity co- 244,600,000 120,000,000* 1990 2110+ Regional Landfill dba Regional WA generation facility'. Disposal Co. 3.Finley Buttes Morrow Waste 4.6MWgas-to- Regional Landfill County, Connections 352 electricity;co- 158,900,000' 131,000,000* 1990 2250+ OR generation facility. 4.Sim co Road Elmore Idaho Waste 628 210,000,000` 200,000,000 2000 2100+ County,ID Systems Planned gas-to- 5.Greater electricity, initially Wenatchee Douglas Waste 157 42,000,000 36,000,000 1960 2110+ County,W Management 1.6 MW expanding to Regional Landfill 3.2 MW a Co-generation facility captures waste heat from burning landfill gas in gas turbines,and uses it to make steam to generate more power in a steam turbine. The water used to produce steam is continually cooled,condensed and reused The co-generation facility captures waste heat from the gas-to-electricity pla ntfor use by anadjacent property owner. b Finley Buttes has the potential to expand to a permitted capacity of 400 million tons. c Simco Road Regional Landfill is currently expanding to a permitted capacity of 420 million tons. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 F-3 Att A Page 367 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste to Energy Facility Under this option,current permitted capacity at Cedar Hills would be exhausted in 2028 and then all of the region's municipal solid waste would be directed to a waste to energy facility built in King County.As discussed previously,a recent study identified a mass burn facility as the best waste to energy technology for consideration by King County(Normandeau 2017). This option would reduce waste 90 percent by volume and 75 percent by weight,while offsetting some costs through sale of electricity and increasing recycling by as much as two percent. Challenges include facility siting, cost, providing guaranteed amounts of feedstock, having unused capacity at the beginning of the operating period with potential inefficient operation during periods when less capacity is used, possible shutdowns due to waste deliveries below the system's requirements, rail capacity constraints for ash and bypass waste export, and other factors. Features of this option include: • For the first 20 years of operation (2028-2048),the facility would be designed to minimize waste that bypasses the facility because it is too bulky or exceeds facility capacity, resulting in a 5,000 tons-per-day plant built on a 40-acre site with five lines that could handle 1,000 tons per day each, • To handle forecast tons, additional capacity would be required beyond 2048, or sooner if the actual tonnage increases faster than forecast, • The mass burn facility would include a tipping floor, pre-incineration screening of non-processable materials at transfer stations, an infeed hopper,combustion chamber, ash collection, metals recovery, and emissions scrubbing systems that use activated carbon and selective catalytic reduction technologies to keep dioxin and other potential emissions below permit limits, • The facility would burn municipal solid waste to produce steam,which turns an electrical turbine to create electricity.Washington State does not currently consider electricity from a mass burn facility as renewable, • The ash produced as a by-product of the process would be screened to recover all remaining metal for recycling, • After screening,ash would be transported to an out-of-county landfill where it would be buried separate from the municipal solid waste in an ash monofill.Various groups are researching beneficial use of incinerator ash; however, in Washington State the ash must be disposed in an ash monofill, and • Non-processable and bypass waste would be transported to an out-of-county landfill. F-4 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 368 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste-to-Energy in King County and the United States In the late 1980s, both King County and the City of Seattle planned to convert from burying municipal solid waste in a landfill to sending waste to a mass burn facility. Protests by the public and environmental groups led both jurisdictions to abandon plans to build mass burn facilities and instead shift emphasis to recycling and waste reduction, along with exploring waste export to out-of-county landfills. However, during the past decade,technological advances in mass burn facilities and the emergence of other potentially viable waste conversion technologies have resulted in renewed interest in these options for long-term disposal once Cedar Hills has reached its permitted capacity. The King County Waste-to-Energy Study(Norma ndea u 2017)identified a mass burn facility as the best waste-to-energy technology to consider for the county's solid waste system.There are 77 individual waste-to-energy facilities in 22 states listed in the Energy Recovery Council 2016 Directoryof Waste to Energy Facilities(E RC 2016).Sixty of thefacilities are mass burn, 13 are refuse-derived fuel,and four are modular. Mass burn is the most common waste-to-energy technology, representing 78 percent of the industry technology in the United States. Most facilities were built before 1996.The most recent plant was built in Florida in 2011(operational in 2015)and is a 3,000 tons per day facility. In the United States,3,000 tons per day is the upper capacity limit on the aging facilities from the 1990s. Small units with capacity of 1,000 tons per day or less have been built and some have been redesigned to expand capacity. A 5,000 ton per day facility, as proposed for King County,would be the largest mass burn facility in the United States. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 F-5 Att A Page 369 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • Appendix Agency Plan Review Letters Att A Page 370 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 i-U-i ,,I A I I I W k%ANt 4 IN t Tt ot, 1.)ITIA RJ lick VNI F f ()I M P 000&-�0 Hijm.014 1 VIA,7,- 10'04 t 1.1111P.1 L 00AP01 It. 1,v#4Puj.q rop i 'MooWi,54J, F U15464V-A*W1 May 1, 2018 Val \k'I ailWflm Kiii,.�( mnl N �,-Oi,i %-. lhvision D[reclur y01 ';-,o, i 1;1, %% A 1; 1 Re: .Ow P)r-;l tc ( miklivehensive Salid Waste Managemeni I'lan—lanuary 2018 EDC.1- I'm N1,:I aughli-1; 111:L_ 1,%t.li 1,-1 111L! llmin:,, to mview and cownioni on ilii, Plan- We fbaod it well-wrtten and hezqutifully produced. We commeml you. as well-on}Our early, afld WdespmW Public involvt-Mnt}„MM ,arld the Diizioll,i 1-L:,,j-v-n.,J%ciies.s.diow:i Lt,Ole --irielN til comments and opinions expressed- Besidesour t;onMtJa1ions,Ecology's formal comments arc tnnsmkW x4 i1b Illi; lokv. We lack forward to reviewing your Final Draft. sinc,erely, Vicki ,SBA ',o Calgewl. C 4 , I kegj01)2J PlflaAinp,Grant$and MOLTCna4 MXIAWMAL Enclosure cc: Polcr Ckrisdanscn Beth Humphreys 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-JZZIY 2o18 G-1 Att A Page 371 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 ICING COUNTY JANUARY 7018 PRELIMINARY URAiJ SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Retriew Ccimrnents fey: Vicki Colgan Solid waste Planner,NWRO May 7,20118 The goals of tric ;olid waste planning process i5 to further reduce thl total am®Lint of waste materials produced by usil,,g tfflective waste reduction, recychng and outreach method5, properly disposing the UM.to remaining,and achieving compliance with state,and local envinC'nmental regulaOons. Fcoingy`s rr.aEPW [:txnnTi-or% arP nfferoPd to '7s5ivt King CU11111y in p0li4hir,r, an FiIrPady roinprPhPnc!vv, alpprow iNe, useful,and beautiful-pFoduced solid waste rnanaaemgnt plan OL'a °,;"r li'.rl•i,s i'I41 .i; "lapmcrre is not an easy assignment considering the multitul14'of r f.-Fpoimhilitie Oil"; III II I Illi; f la II, . i ..I >,'; i :1',? •' Iht exlefsslve 2 llitrl :1.'Edi ils alvvvlClpiCih I.-Id LIprl,3tinl*this f raft CArr,I�rE], n5ik Solid Waste II'. .;Clt;ltl;:ll, t11E F31311 preSCrte~d to f_CQID0,y f°ia5 Unfll;i 1.4 anfj is Still cindergoinga thorough i0"117,'- f,ll',�; LUuI°It,V SoliJ 'hlosk('AO%.-isoi-e i:,°III,'„11 tee (5WAC), tilt rwtietropol"rtan Solid Waste Manage rill-^,`,',,.I,:;.: } ({1�,tllltl+'C UVI5WN4AC},blot;C,-+',jmy 6- )e5, llalriin ,vi vice prov.ders,Tribal representatives,: 0,1- pul::!I .:,I rl :yl I ; iioorerti,d pnriw5 iii kt,r;Cu;jnty. This Plan, Founded on Wetl-concelved asitl r:s�e 1:; ills ;yr;s ll,e= .Ss and 10015fCing County will u5e as it cootlnoes to perform Itslot)of solld WV Tite ha idle g al�d waste reduction within Tts jurisdiction.. Til 1--c,-al complete as possible, portions of this Plan were re}:iewcod by staff who specialize irk the fields of laa_Ilitil'`.. Lirganlcs, solid wa5te handl4jj.G,god Ct'Li ii HH15 I.Irid H. Thuir I_omriit?iLJS ori In luded in EcGlogy�;conimeiits below,which are organued its follctir•,_: 1 Prc>' Clilr,:;Iteirls that must be addressed prior t❑ Ecology approval 2- com1'lit it+ rrl.7,1:11 I' uSt bEr 7dlir[�ssr.d prior to Ecology approval 3. Highly Feconrini :..t r l,11-l9e5 You will note th, t, ;°]I.!°,-r thin use 'd:viSi3rr' il,.trweF case a5 can often he seen in Legislative Language land as dorie 1111 YOL11 P'j 1. I'V car,t l!I;:':I °.vord here,since it is used throughout as a name. PROCEDURAL ITEMS THAT MUST OF ADDRESSED PRIOR TO PLA N APPROVAI Resolutions of Adoption: Bing Cowlity, Its cities,and other entiLk s With interlocal agicTeiwnts lienal to approve the 01,3(ldleri(:0ITiprehensive Solid WaSte Mariageirient Plan ICSWMPI nrinr to Fix�I;sEy's approval of the final draft. Tease include a statement assuring that the plan acceptarcf. process uutliIik0IIIl,l1eIIItClkJLAI jgjUell[el 11leasbeen I'V41Iled, E lolaray Crim,,-MV 10 F'1Q p CULMLY 5uhd,,id t-x Irda,W,WYaaa,,Aaar,avWnelit Flaa—Pace 1 G-2 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 372 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 1131II-Q;i014 Of lettk7f�: M'--"- lilo,!:- -,I;rhi,Plan the letters from bath the State Deprr;tinvnl of :11°'.III.,, !I Irl ",'Ire 'A'.11 li"i,.Ior and Transportation CommissiDn sent in rrKponsr-to tll;_;i 1 4=, :::'A%.:, i i..sk�Ecology comments on the Prel'imini-Y Drall. SEFIA Crlri:filetion: A,of I I),( %,:w 1g,your pfograrniviatic State Environmental Policy Ar-,t ISE PA) F-1i-:11 tW-1-"I"JI 'I r f0l I'it%i�llr -".'Ljt Of 11 PC!I-iod and likely il-.i"i cosl-;i�; r-I 1;1'1-1%1-. I Y 11 ill)-, on or beforo ill-- JAI(-Tlli' Dr<li L �5 and 1.'-ease E!r-%jre a copy of[1'-41 1 oki� isi�ormii Fr :,oi I I , qjr Irrilmcl S1..iterilomL us aow final,is included in the Final bro' UY.'q.T':1F. SWAC PaTtidpatlow Per Chapter 70,95.167(1) FtCVj,J fte I I Pla' Wrl y I(';L".,I I i I,I i I,-n d racycfinl; leme nt of the Plan is apprav,--d by 1 1w local legislative authority,but Before jT is�-!I -Bitted to Ecology lo( ippraval, the SWAG must hold another meeting to review The Fina[graft of this element. Please veriliv SWAC participation With It, 5otes/nn1notes containing discussion of this review. CONTENT ITF MS TkAT MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR T 0 E CO LOGY APPROVAL Gate AdivIstment to Restoration of Closed Landfills(Page.5-24) The five-year period Stated on page 6-24 is from VVAC 173-301-309, Because Chapter 113-301 WAC.was repealed in !985 when Chapter 173-304 WAC went into effect,the fiy-�-year period is not applicable and should not Ibe cited,For these landfills that dosed before 1985(the effective date of Chapter 173-3174 WAC),the;i p plicibL?reoulations are those of the Code of the King Co url ty Board of Health,Title 10. Update L5WFA Info rmadon tftge 44811 Since this Draft PIAN WOS IAR50111!1211 fpr review before the Legislature passed Rhe Capit�al Budget iiii Mid. January, 2019,the Lo Cal Solid Waste Fina nt ial A-ssislaii ree(LSW FA)program is now funded and weIl- ti nd of In aq.Sadly,t Ii:?amount nf funding available was reduced oi ive again for imple nian t a I;fD n projects but enforcement programs were funded at levels comparable to the[Est funding f7yfle--rlif7 Washington MIM1`1111433rit Of EL0109Y administers LSWFA in King County on behalf of many of tfiL suburban cilies,as well as for the Division ajW King Courity Public Health, Important Additlon;(Page!;x-Al,2-191 0 Please add the word"legal'after the word'Any'in the divemloin d4Jirpitiork to i'LJ14?Our illegal durnpirip,as an option. 6 131 u a se add a registered mark to the Leadership 1n Energy and Environmental D esige BLEED} definition, 1,1e preceding LECO'acrollvili,and to its first mpntbn in the text on page 2-19, I-1 I G H LY 9 ECOMPA ENDED C HANGIES Plan Year I(Page A-1)- I oi ;i.irq! I yi!or i of th5 Plin to 2018,or vetter 2019,as Rion iinpI,ri,oiii,-Ltian �c-E.iri}onc,.- Ji;Qh"CVTnnnrrdl If.i VdjjtL 1.1in3qcme?nj Fasn—Traci 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan—JZZIY 2o18 G-3 Att A Page 373 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 More Additlotls QFlnas kic-41):DMininC'acIv.Ij '-(l rm tenal recovE,ry' and 'r1akei1a1 i txovery facility' would also facilitate lay readers'uradN',tdnLlirlg of rurilrnun Ie rril Li_Lf:uI c)1.r inL1;I'try- Composting and Fr xi Recovery Facilities.Somewhere in Chapter 2 it viould he pond to build Irl a map CII L1._°x1101 °... .I,i „- .-::+ .'-'1 the Current conlpo5ting and food-re5tue facilities:. I r,AUrc% I I',>r;o 2-:'n}: ± i r,.'l I.I�rfan;ntir3lril; ?;;raor;,L nit'V to Insert more inf+nn.;Linri on i,1h1µ4-; F1:1y.Itin4i,,1.-, I P,ii;1 =1 114 J: 1' i cinsidef movirm r +;:'.-<±':II,LJ 1:ono paragrap9 i Lip to irnlylf°r:!.,.:°i.'I 11 '.'.' ,. 1 ,I,.,I,':^ 11; i•.IJ,= r1 ^0 1°: :'Ir•tom ,'I,Li.-IIT 1 A thF'IPrld fif 1hP WCnnd rara&rslll-, ill "1011;an,.i .'I°-. f.,..,°. .i .\•.. .-. ,'.r,t; �to,r)rr,,?,-i. vli:::IrUhieSlon. blut 51Ly i.}I 5-G1155Irm f Parc 4-20); 'tis ft was s :sir_;° ;:, :, r,li ,.7ge 4 i?,o r11c Draft CSVVM11"gi"n expected chanFr,-, ,II° hiwl'� ,°}-;J t 1,c}liC112: II 0.11x1'A: II!,c lu1!C,JI!,I 1 1360 dl :SCV pt[Oh 011 the inlpart5 fell I�y the division and h+, r I,o% :ii—iI r1J36:ti11h tr,t-I111ia'tvjui d : NiJLi(31till Svrard- F`I.i,,til.°;rIf.-.VL FppnIeDt5. Flail C'a;s;,city(page(, 1j)): Ir. i: :1;:,i, 1,°IIf 111-1c the Waste Export scenarlo twill require far greeter rail Capacia','t11 ,1' v:111 I1,:= °.,,,+, F,i,•ri;ti ojitioi%. t_an LN5 dirferenr7e be estimatf=d, perhaps in percentrig terms?To Y,I",I,:.I',ooii.::` iS 11+, •.,..•:l,,,1 y1,11,'„ a',•1 QE 111 i3 FMrdfrapi1 re�frreprog? Fgure Titles(Pages t--11 to 6-ifi):L c,1, ,,:lel JddIIIK 04110Y t11e word';,',,I,r,I,.r nr the ward'Ertirr te' a� ap pro pri ah}Id the Wit r;of the Fit'.0 r,'•y o ppe a ri ng ion t heSC I73 t?;5_,-,r':""01,,: L I I L:idea t hr3 L .-'I' ,:'1 ,,s.'"„ 5111110 }I S71C-r.1,K}11's,E3111 An-'rinal'p.14(that I focros?'S orl k4!y+Izictor'," t:Ir,;1 ir, ,,,-,f i.m-L3dllcc,,.,L i, thl$ SCCIi(1+1 Pd so,1}1 m' 0 rC°.fr I L'11.' r%ddC'r tc diiy or-.V table?(11 list I%L!t,-!i lr1•'I.)i,i'i'1�I.)4-',,:l ,;I,-.,tir17117Llow that n,a)r ewpaod no the{ontLnts o1 tll,rtiP riguros. Figure 6-8: W11110LJr ,1rw!fill I LtcKfi1-,F-rid{w e t 6 aplie,ir}10 SIIUW ti Can Sirserabh:! :J,1,: 111! I°°i'll °.','%i 1;;, re5Jdklal5 to a lay petro-i haw l„just 100k(A :it thf°MIStP W f 1014gy t1,111 (11 LI',C'�.I r,1)�Iti ; if Plea redrisW 111is g.aph to inclLlde the nthel I)Frf:{;lit of re('yclable nmteri;,l;,, L. ,Icr°: tl-Inru wa{,a Certain pi1i10 YLILi wire trying to make by showing a mod est gain with a Fat helr ioflo-.,i_trrl,.I i. If so, please Jew rib, the, purpose for the graph(as is)In the text, Prig of Success(Page 7-1UM: [-low w nulcl rpac:hing the MIX riIvemion guaI at.Cellar Hills,Fivers the Irk,!i,%tiiry iilcrr.i5e irl urganic5,Cflrrpnstlmr�, thrid food recycling,affect oUrput of the Landfill-Gdb'io- I:nert":Y rlant? Additional AppendiK:A tattle listing each of the colt eategaries used to geiwRte Figures 6-3 and 6•6 'specially%VOLrIC1 111a3 a.10 ftCellC3M dpl}L'11tj1JL, Anal Yp,ily Viv L'(Mij iarinjF-;apF11'.!s Ji)-apples appraath the Divi%ion is atil?PnpI11,,p here. (J7HFR COMMENTS Those that stingeM change, Eedvgylormhicn4laP:int.Cuumy'%Dr,11LCUmprLtwrE4iVCWir"'..1 P:i.1:,- ,.r,ru:I"ii. J.I:,,,�-, GA 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 Att A Page 374 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Uniform Color Use; 101'15it C h.:'rk"' 4 lo'.L.Asting "Id Data. C01-1515W'r 0; I C'fJI-esenting th+n ",I... ...A;: "r, ISI�!'.I., i!;.l rr.1.7,1 h--j 11. i e 3-3 and by gi[:C'Il III pip'kjw.3-4, as an example), to avorl Definlrig TLrms. Aft DIINflfIIII(,the;i 1 1!I.' 1111-1.1 1:,'pI 110 11,11'11 7 11 I,. I.1- t-i ii I oi r,-,r onexpecled te:i(-Hn�.(q),;,j 0 Including I S'tD tliu I W (PagkL Xiiii)Please :i{;I:HoL,-ij wastc provvimtian i 1) rI :'A .kjr,sF1,1, 11 F,I 7',';Ia9P I teM5 wi t h I ess or no P:.K r1k. 4, It --vi 11.1(1 I)e FYnf)cl t(i ver I I I I I i kc I j I i I I I i o,: Transportatii-1- Co1inii5slon is still using W in Itis y I I r(j 0 1'I'l h1i-" 1-.11 1 tro not ri i)yi)l t I r e-. I I I P.:-,I)i i I r Lrd C I:I-i r:.I I 11, C . I!II u(Th N�78"text box,compocloon and ;11ji-,::�W!1, r.1 .)I,"=r', 1'!11'l" 11 i-w coiisoledariion and consvilidates(see use ori 4:.;. 11,,:. `-;,%sion seethe c %-, 6 t-,i it h.- 1)01;)iLrl to p�e5mt your thLfw-m:--I- ..r I:,-i.., .!;airier rwighiiof'. %ince that -eljcwioii t.cenks to v6jy gr,athj:m%ori8 pffirilf..... Oulleted Response Levels�Pajge 6-24); eicli&Minitiofi of thy-- three Leval~L)y Lmllc-1,3 hvrr-- %',")IIW rl%XI: VIL.-de1j0jti095 easier,to read and locate in the document- 15 WQII.15 WL)L):d add(,I)Iplwsi:i lo this important concept on what to expect In an emewric!y. References:The websites given far many of the references ere great tools for those of us that like t13 4 1 LI further rewarrK is it pos5lble to and to the citaflons Without website>where the material can be obtained or at least add an introductory paragraph on general guidance for contacting the sources at the beginning of Chapter 97 Labeled Appen6ices.It may be lielpfol for the reader it each Appendix were lat)eled as to its contents, much like the Cliaptf-rs of the Flan are,e5peciatly In the Table of Contems OTHER CONAMEN'S Commefits thm applaud worli ongoing or already romplete: SQ lection and pta cerne ra GI the photographs in the Plan made for easy reading as dlij the p rese, thankfully iibseathe'n(WITIAl'tfpotitlive references old-school technluJ Wrtrers employ. The blvix text boxo5(jsQd OFOUghnilt that explain uncommon terms or!ipeodaliv-tcl i-cjncvpl�ori, very welcomed and fkirther add io thr.(larity and readability of this Plaii. Noted drip applawied iiio thIL' ap'.wml worded definitions of Lquity and sustairrahllity orl rl-,., o penni ng pages of the P!,1 r I. ELD161-7 CIM'1711'1fU 10 F111F Zgljnjy'y 11rill �L-I-d VeAfle MAAAfl4-11IkM1 PI-0-hnUIF.A,7F0 1 I;li,- 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2018 G-5 Att A Page 375 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 k Figure 2-5:Current Layout of Cedar Hills Landfill illustrates the principle thist"a picture is worth a thousand words,"said map tieing quite easy to Interpret,as well as nice IV colored I r Examples gi-.,Pn on ways to fmprove trafrir n1,,11iJf?ri1r?nt A Innsfer statlons given on page 2,14 are 15pirf i- I I.;t^-:v safo 16 a,y 11-1 114x1 I I}., .,°,li I,,.Ni ',';OL Id be compatible with cera phviiL, Vla'- iI-, 11.1fln' I''. 1(1 !71:;,,rstVill1)r:" I-,i 3 of:= r,I,I.IIviewirg;locations- I look forward to thl.'ll II"I; I 'I'I!'lll o!i I(:r"i I w Another inspirational idea i$tIl + 1:.!pair Grouts cited on page 4-11-a great waste reduction/ sustainable matBriair,managem "i l ,I... �, with they ::irlari hanrfit of rnmmwrnity-h!liiding that can help eo5e equity is5;W-1. Esperfallyregardiop,Cl,; iwrs 2, :,Istl ti i' .. ;i,lir'r o.,l: t'r I: 171,;::,1 'I! "" t' 1..;r',, ,r1t`yl continues to tale In I)iil,l7lllFt�t ,'iI�'�[,Iis+; 1:": I;}}i7<iei^i".7i:.i�. Ift"" ",.Ii'.'iiiS,il:Ii ri--itetlals managemimt pFaCtl{CS 10[I il.i=:I(l.°l'°.! °I1.0 (IIlY lent'. i dew wast;}hamik I; Success nut mily mgoire5 car4ful ploniling anti strategic publicinvoivernent,liol . .cl pll1 diel n and finesse to achieve. Well done+ Transfer Station Upgrades/New Conscruclion: Ecology's Norti-west Rcgiollal Oifice sits just uphill from the j%Lw Nct orik Tiarrsfer Station,and we have vis ted-and used ds pnv.iri, fling County citizens-the new facilities at Etfudn%lacy,Shareline acid Bow Lake. We found these fad Iaies easy to access,tho ugh Ifully laid out,staffed with skilled peopie,and effIF107!t 111 operation, We commend as well as appreciate the division's careful design and construrt on of these transfer stations,which dicorporated many elements ofsustainable building that will.add to their longevity,Inner the cast of their upkeep,and provide staff with superior working roraditioiks. And again,well done[ ReSpectfulry klihinitted, Vicki Colgan, CSa4,,LE D AF Regional Planning, Gr s and Moterials Management WA Dept,of Ecology, NW W 2R prrmjgrani 3190 160th Ave.5E. Bellevue WA 93003-5452 425/649-7224 vcol:4G1eecy.wa,paw [ PARTMUNT Or ECOLOGY tai°e [rl 4Va�,hi��4�tt Evah*q Cprnmemh tG KJWp Ctwr,Sy saod blld tiauldCLLS Waste IManapymym plan-WRim f G-6 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 376 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Service Date: February 8,2018 STATE OF WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1300 S.Evergreen Park Dr.S.W.,P.O.Box 47250. Olympia, Washington 98504-7250 (360)664-1160 9 TTY(360)686-8203 February 8,2018 Meg Morehead King County Solid Waste Division,DNRP King Street Center 201 S. Jackson Street Seattle,WA 98104-3855 RE: King County Draft Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Cost Assessment Questionnaire,TG-180044 Dear Ms. Morehead: The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission(Commission)has completed its review of the cost assessment questionnaire for the draft of the King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(Plan), submitted Janurary 9, 2018. The cost assessment questionnaire in the Plan proposes three tip fee increases at all King County transfer stations during the 2017—2022 Plan period. The tip fee increase in 2017 has already been in effect for over a year,while the other two tip fee increases are projected to take effect in 2019 and 2022.As a result, there will be a rate impact to ratepayers served by regulated solid waste collection companies in King County in years 2019 and 2022. This is illustrated in the table shown on the following page. Respect. Professionalism. Integrity.Accountability. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 G-7 Att A Page 377 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Letter to Meg Morehead TG-180044 Page 2 2017* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total All King County Transfer Stations—Projected Disposal Fees Per Ton Disposal Cost $134.59 $134.59 $141.66 $141.66 $141.66 $147.33 Per Ton Increase $14.42 $0.00 $7.07 $0.00 $0.00 $5.67 $27.16 Projected Rate Increases Residential Monthly rate increase for $1.06 $0.00 $0.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.42 $2.00 one 32-gallon can per week service Commercial Monthly rate increase for $5.47 $0.00 $2.68 $0.00 $0.00 $2.15 $10.30 one-yard per pick up service *The 2017 tip fee has been in place since January 1, 2017, therefore customers have already experienced the rate effect of this tip fee increase. Staff has no further comment on the cost assessment questionnaire. Please direct questions or comments to Greg Hammond at (360) 664-1278, or by email at greg.hammond@utc.wa.gov. Sincerely, Steven V. King Executive Director and Secretary cc: Vicki Colgan, Department of Ecology, Regional Planner Ci-8 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 378 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Service Date: June 14, 2018 ;eti. STATE OF WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1300 S.Evergreen Park Dr. S.W., P.O. Box 47250 a Olympia, Washington 98504-7250 (360)664-1160 e TTY(360) 586-8203 June 14, 2018 Meg Morehead King County Solid Waste Division, DNRP King Street Center 201 S. Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 RE: Revised King County Draft Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Cost Assessment Questionnaire, TG-180451 Dear Ms. Morehead: The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Commission)has completed its review of the revised cost assessment questionnaire for the draft of the King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (Plan), submitted May 18, 2018. Staff reviewed this plan and the prior cost assessment questionnaire under the previous Docket, TG-180044. The cost assessment questionnaire portion was updated at the request of Department of Ecology due to the fact that the plan period began in 2017, which was one full year out of date when filed with the Commission. There was a relatively large change to the overall recycling rate in this revised cost assessment. From 2017 to 2018, the recycling rate dropped 5.4 percent, to an overall recycling rate of 52 percent. This is due to a 14 percent increase in garbage tonnage disposed, and an 8 percent reduction in recycling tons processed. The County proposes two tip fee increases at all King County transfer stations during the 2018 —2023 Plan period. These tip fee increases are expected to occur in 2020 and 2023. As a result, there will be a rate impact to ratepayers served by regulated solid waste collection companies in King County in years 2020 and 2023. This is illustrated in the table shown on the following page. Respect. Professionalism. Integrity. Accountability. 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o-z8 G-9 Att A Page 379 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Letter to Meg Morehead TG-180451 Page 2 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total All King County Transfer Stations—Projected Disposal Fees Per Ton Disposal Cost $134.59 $134.59 $140.82 $140.82 $140.82 $154.16 Per Ton Increase $0.00 $0.00 $6.23 $0.00 $0.00 $13.34 $19.57 Projected Rate Increases Residential Monthly rate increase for $0.00 $0.00 $0.46 $0.00 $0.00 $0.98 $1.44 one 32-gallon can per week service Commercial Monthly rate increase for $0.00 $0.00 $2.36 $0.00 $0.00 $5.06 $7.42 one-yard per pick up service Staff has no further comment on the cost assessment questionnaire. Please direct questions or comments to Greg Hammond at(360) 664-1278 or by email at greg.hammond@utc.wa.gov. Sincerely, Mark L. Johnson Executive Director and Secretary cc: Vicki Colgan, Department of Ecology, Regional Planner G-10 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 Att A Page 380 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Division of Plant Protection P.O.Box 42560-Olympia,Washington 98504-2560-(360)902-1800 March 7,2018 Ms. Meg Moorehead Strategy, Communications, and Performance Manager King County Solid Waste Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks King Street Center 201 S. Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Dear:Ms.Moorehead, The Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) reviewed King County's Draft Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP).Our staff has determined that the draft SWMP is in compliance with state plant pest and disease quarantines as described in Chapter 16-470 WAC. We reviewed the waste management plan with particular emphasis to the state's apple maggot quarantine, described in Chapter 16-470-101 WAC. The transport of municipal green waste and municipal solid waste from the apple maggot quarantine area to the pest free area is prohibited without a WSDA special permit. WSDA will not require King County to have a special permit to ship municipal solid waste or green waste. However, if the conditions contained in the SWMP change and you have questions about whether King County is in compliance with the apple maggot quarantine rule please do not hesitate to contact me or WSDA Pest Program staff Thank you for providing our agency with the opportunity to comment on the King County Solid Waste Management Plan. RCW 70.95.096 requires the Washington State Department of Agriculture to review solid waste permit applications for any increased risks of introducing a quarantine plant pest or disease into apest free area. Rega s, Jim Marra, Ph.D. cc:Leah Doyle 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan-July 2o18 G-1 1 Att A Page 381 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Appendix H Title to Plaii Content Cade Requiremenis Att A Page 382 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Att A Page 383 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 The following describes how the Plan meets these Title 10.24.30 Plan content requirements: F. A current inventory and description of solid waste collection needs and operations within each respective jurisdiction, which shall include: 1. Any franchise for solid waste collection granted by the utilities and transportation commission in the respective jurisdictions including the franchise holder's name, the business address for the franchise, the area covered by the franchise and the rates charged in comparison to disposal costs; Most of the required information can be found in Appendix A— Utilities and Transportation Commission Cost Assessment: • Specific information regarding UTC-regulated haulers including G-certificate permit numbers, addresses, customers served and tons collected as well as six-year projections for both can be found on pages A-4 through A-5. • A map, Solid Waste Collection Company Service Areas, is included on page H-6 • More general information regarding non-regulated hauler areas (cities with contracts), including number of customers and tons collected as well as six-year projections for both can be found on pages A-6 through A-7. • Appendix A, pages A-2 throughA-14 provides details on the system component costs and funding mechanisms. Pages A-13 and A-14 includes information on division revenues and expenditures, including disposal costs. • Attachment A includes a tariff page from each hauler serving unincorporated King County and UTC-regulated cities for the residential curbside rate, the disposal rates, and a link to the entire UTC franchise tariff. • Table 4-4 on pages 4-22 and 4-23 in Chapter 4 identifies which hauler is serving which city and unincorporated area along with other contract and collection information. 2. Any city solid waste operational plan, including boundaries and identification of responsibilities; By signing the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement, all of the 37 cities in the King County solid waste system have agreed that the King County Solid Waste Division is the planning authority for the system, therefore the cities don't have their own solid waste plans. Att A Page 384 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 3. The population density of each area serviced by a city operation or by a franchised operation within the respective jurisdictions; • Appendix A, page A-1, includes the population projections for the entire King County system. • The area served by the regional system, including cities and the unincorporated areas, is shown in Figure 2-1, page 2-2. • Chapter 3 discusses the current and projected population of areas served by the transfer stations (which encompasses all of the cities and urban areas). • The City of Enumclaw provides solid waste collection to a population of 11,490. The City of Skykomish services a population on 200. • Population of areas served by UTC-regulated haulers include: Area Population Beaux Arts 300 Black Diamond 4,335 Hunts Point 415 Kenmore 22,580 Medina 3,205 Woodinville 11,660 Yarrow Point 1,040 Unincorporated King County 245,920 4. The projected solid waste collection needs for the respective jurisdictions for the next six years; • Chapter 3 includes details of solid waste generation projections for the future. • Chapter 4 discusses current and future collection issues (pages 4-21 to 4-35). • Table 4-4, on page 4-22 and 4-23, includes information on haulers, contracts, and collection needs/service types in each jurisdiction. 5. Analysis of operating economics, travel distances and economically optimal locations of solid waste facilities; Route efficiency is essential to operating economics, travel distances, and economically optimal locations of solid waste facilities as described below: • Chapter 5 discusses planning for the Transfer System. Figure 5-1, page 5-2, shows where each of the transfer facilities and Cedar Hills Landfill is located. The map shows that the facilities are well-distributed to maximize the efficiency of the system. • Table 5-1 lists each station and how many tons and transactions each received in 2017. Att A Page 385 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 • The Plan discusses the need to site and build a new transfer station in the Northeast part of the county, but does not identify a site. • The Plan discusses the Level of Service criteria (including travel distance, which is an indicator of route efficiency) and siting criteria (developed as part of the Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan) that will be used in the siting process. These criteria take operating economics and location into account. • A map, Census Tract Travel Time to Nearest Solid Waste Transfer Station, included on page H-7, shows that the travel times to the nearest station meet the Level of Service criteria. This criterion indicates how conveniently located the facilities are for customers (including commercial haulers concerned with maximizing route efficiency), measured by the maximum travel time to the closest facility in their service area. The standard was established as 30 minutes for at least 90 percent of the customers. It provides an indication of whether the transfer stations are well dispersed throughout the county. G. A review of potential areas that meet the siting criteria as outlined in RCW 70.95.165. The siting process for the NERTS has not progressed to a point where any potential sites have been identified. A budget request to start a preliminary siting process was submitted for Council consideration, but has not yet been approved. • The Plan discusses the siting process (pages 5-18 through 5-20) that was used for the South County Recycling and Transfer Station and will be adapted for NERTS. • Action 1-t also states that the siting criteria identified in the Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan, Appendix C, will be adapted to meet the community needs in siting a new NERTS. Appendix C identifies the same elements to review that are included in RCW 70.95.1. Att A Page 386 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 N o A . w} 3 J'IT 0 c 6 53 Att A Page 387 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 y �YpLI u1, i 'all r �4 �F full ]r U '4 s H E ¢ E Att A Page 388 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 ATTACHMENT A American Disposal Company, Inc. G-Permit G-87 Serves Vashon Island https://www.utc.wa.gov/regulatedi ndustries/transportation/TransportationDocuments/American%2ODi sposal%20Company%201nc%2OVashon%2ODisposal%20G-87%2OTariff%20No%201.pdf RECEIVED NOV 03,2016 WA. UTI &TRANS, COMM.ORIGINAL TIG-161184 SUB 11129/16 Tariff No. 1 3 Revised Page Fac. 2 Convany NametPefrw Number American blsposs Co Inc "7 Reglslare0 TradeNwla(ej Vashon blsposel Fern 11313–Residential SeNee–Monthly [Cdna11l1ed an Helm.Pape) Rales ri lhls Hem arJply: (1)To sold wa3te ccllea nip.urns1de recyrJing(where notecil and yardwasbe services(where NAM)Inv irealckmAelprupLAY. ems,rroole'hornes, condarnInKrns.etc..wyrere service is lid dlreclly 113 the occupant of each resicerkat un,and4u (21 When requlreo by a:xal go;emnlent service leve+annroanos,saws waste maieection.curmcle ieccyc" and yardwasle service mull he pravvted lar sirx tarnlly dwe:Angs.duplexes.rnoble 7ohtea, condos iN,!hls-and apahment buomngs of less than res0ent"Hurts.where servror is Med In tr1E property~Xf ar nlanag-- Rates below apply In the follow,•y srrvlce area: Numbercrl F.* -, .. .. PEMy`e k—h:-'.'Ic rt—Wa Fl p---y r3ar" R-110"! Taldx9O2 Lin=.Trp. V .. zi-- 1111051 Tj. ui 5—r"-= aL`nrlm S— .r iia Rn. Pa.r. �I:' R.I. Ra& RYe kA: 1 EOWG ^;s iA InFran W a L '_1'a .;A! 2 WG a we + WG 'ib FOrfaR.oriel EIWE,3ge 5 �. a EOWP.wlthout g8 5 Flaawrrrtors=aas:YVS h)mktVGLrhap EowaEr yOtlwti miilE;Tg:M—Narrmgn.rbWWR-Wii, yla—.yr:.uy E01WR-E'Nry 03W riree R@CW":hF Mclmrlj Fl. d :L.trl aBlera uwtl M'�RINrIF. Nne 1: bescrlpbonftians re[alerr to recycling program ata enown an page 23. No*2: related to yardwsele prograhi are shorn on page Now 3: n aetmltisrt m ma reaynmg rales shown above,a recyclerg debpaaeda 3 BMWs. "cling service rates an Inls page expoe on: Issued By Ffeatrler Gadmid ladle bete' Novertmer 1d,21316 Fffedive0atn: Jarkiery 1.2617 (Far Oftiar Like onyp borxet No.TG Dew: By. FOR OFFICRL tISE ONLY Dvckei- IG-161184 .4g mla Date Dec•eynb r 8.016 F errrileDam-.laiTmcrrt'1.2017 Att A Page 389 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 RECEIVED NOV 03, 2016 WA. (JT_ TRANS_ COMM- ORIGINAL TG-161184 ?._rift No. 1 4 Revised Page No- 34 C crr nary NameMennat Number: A rnetiran disposal Co Inc G-97 a,r.=.lered Trade Naane s vashon Item 230—DL:s l Fees Charges in This+tem apply when other items in the larifi spBeftalty referto this it Disposal site name or T;r-: :. ',naberial King County Landriff $l s:.SY Ai oer IDr, S per S per r $ per 5per r $ per S per $ per $ per S per S per S per $ _r S per S par S per 5 ar sr S per S _r $ per S per S per is per $ per Sper SI_I:a-r'°?1,L I yes are per yard,per ton,etc. Include charges assessed for special corm rnodities I bre5. app,ances,astksics.eic_)or specielcondtiom at each specific cispceal site. Mach additional sheets as necessary. Issued By: Heather Garland Ensue date: November 14,201E Effective date: JamBry 1,2417 l'Fnr Ofii &V bba Ordyl dna Na.T& Date: By' FTYRFFIC"14L USE fl LY Doekel: TCi-16118,E .41 efrrla Date:Lkcembe,•8, 7016 a J)e,e ive Lkne:January 1, 2017 Att A Page 390 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Rabanco LTD Permit G-12 https://www.utc.wa.gov/regulatedi ndustries/transportation/TransportationDocuments/Rabanco%20LT D%20dba%20Eastside%2c%20Container%20Hauling%20G-12%20Tariff%2011.pdf Serves Unincorporated King County, Beaux Arts, Hunts Point, Kenmore, Medina, and Yarrow Point RECEIVED MAY 31, 2018 WA. UT. & TRANS.COMM.ORIGINAL TG-180484 SUR 07/12118 Tariff No. 91 281h I Revised page No- 21 Company NamelPermit Number: Rahanco LTD G-12 Registered Trade Name(s) Ensmae Om sal,Rabanm corn Rebenao Cn nerede teem 100--Residential Service--Monthly Rates(continued on next page) Rates in this item apply_ (1)T4 solid waste collection,Curbside recycling(where noted)and yardwasle services(where noted)for residential property. This Includes single family dwellings..duplexes,apartments-moblle homes, condominiums,etc-,where service is tilled directly to the occupant of each resi:dentiAl unit,andfor (2) When required by a local government service leve3 ordinance.solid waste collection,curbside recycling,and yardwaste service must be provided for single-fatuity dwellings,duplexes,mobile homes, Wridominiums,and apartment buildings of less than 4 residential units,where service s billed to the property owner or manager. Rates below apply in the following service area: Appendix A t+lw tGe<Of Frequency Gaibage Recycle Yar�.ast= room Llnnsor Type of Serv!oe Sernxa Organics Container of Conlainers Service Rale Rale Service Rale Rental 20 gallon can WGIEOWR 58.05 $9.23 $9.23 $0.42 1 Can WQEOWR 512.93 $9.23 $923 $0-53 2 Can WGIEOWR 522.00 $9.23 $9.23 $1.05 3 Can I WG+EOWR 532.18 $9.23 $9.23 $1.59 4 Can WQEOWR 343.23 $9.23 $9.23 $2-12 5 Can WG1EU',r5ll 554.55 $9.23 $9.23 $2.65 32 Gal Tater WG1E0VVlR 512.93 $9.23 $923 $1-09 64 Gal Toter VVG1EOVVR 321.92 $9.23 $9.23 $1.85 96 Gal Toter WUGlEOWR 532.01 $9.23 $923 $1-85 1 Carl MGIEOWR 54.56 $9.23 $9.23 $4.53 YReeo{ $10.23 tn) $1-86 20 Gal Toter(N)l EOWV Organics(trrhited avaidabiHty) $8.82 $1.09 see page 255 32 Gal Bear Proof Toter $12.93 53.94 see note 8 64 Gal Bear Proof Toter $22.110 $3.17 see nate 8 96 Gal Bear Proof Toter 1 $32.18 $8.43 see flute 8 Frequency of Service Codes:W(s Weekaq Csarhagr,E6NfQ�very Other Week:�aroage;hi�hhc nt'-: :=uM1eekly R2c}YAiny EDWR-Evart'Otrrer Week Recycling:MR--Kbntruy Recycling cs:cmers xed by mmpany. Note 1: Descriptionhules related Id r"Ong program are shown on page 25. Note 2: Descriptionhules related Id yardwaste program are shown on page 26. Note 3: In addition to the recycling rales shown above,a retycling debit/(Credit)df X 16)(A)applies- Note 4:Recycling rates shown above are subject to an additional recycling pracessing surcharge of$0.55 per month. the recycling processing surcharge on this page will expire:Docamber 31,2018 Recycling rates Din this page expire an: January 31,2814 Issued By: Rick Waldren,Business Unit Controller Issue Date: June 15,2018 Effective Date August 1 2018 (Pcv OMciat Use Only) Dockel No.TG- nate_ By: FOR OFFICIAL USE[] LY Att A Page 391 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 RECEI VED MAY 31, 2018WA. [JT. & TRANS_ COMM. ORIGINAL TC-180484 S t I B 07/12/18 Tatf No- 11 29th Revised Page No. 23 C.ornpeny NamelFemml Numter. Rabartco LTCB G-12 Pea-.eredTrade Name(s) Eas.iteolWc a.rtacarc:oC_ -�a.�.gamncoc;anwnci:lcws Item 104-Residential Service-Montkdy]affis 1 eonbrued on nex!Paps 1 Re'es in this item apply: 11)To soled waste CODE/ Lan.curbside recycling twhere noted}and wardwaste services(where noted}for residermaa property. This includes single family dwre4ungs,duplexes,apartments,motdle homes. condo rurtiums.etc..where serurce is tAIL-d directly to the aceupeni of each residential:mit.ancuor (2) When required try a local government service level ordinance,solid waste oollectkn,curbside recycling,and yardwaste service must be provided for single-family dwelrtnxgs,duplexes,mobile homes, condominiums,and apartment buildings of lens&on 4 residential units,where service is biles to Phe property owner or rnariageT. Rales below apply rcr Ore fo/ewing service area: Appendix B taaoer at FMQLer�I Garge 4 1k Yardxas:e 1 r7ciunx Unitsw FMa ail tier m Somas Organics I Cc-�-- Cd CaNamerm G wn Hate nate Servi a Rate Ke 20 galloncan WOMR $8-05 $1147 _"75 $0.42 1 Can W GMR $12-93 $11.47 75 S0.53 2 Can 1NG-1WR $22-00 $11.47 $12.75 $1.66 3 Can W&WR $.32.18 $11.47 ST2.75 $1.69 4 Can 44G11NR $4,3.23 $1'.I" 3t2.75 $2J2 5 Can 4VGWR 554.58 $11. $42.75 $2.65 32'Cal T-oier 4VG-WR $12.93 $11 $42-75 $1.09 61 Gai'•offer 4VGMR $21.92 $.1 q.-I r' $12.75 $1.86 %Gal 7 oief WG,,W1R 532.01 $11 47 512.75 $1.86 1 Can I.IGd',4'R 54.66 $1;•I:' 542.75 $0.S3 Recycle O $12 Yardwaste Only "175 $1.86 32 Gal Beer Prcof Toter $12.93 SIN see 64 Gal Boer Proof Tater 522.00 58.17 see"acre 3 96 Gal Bear Proof Tatar $32.19 Sc'.43 sac node 8 FrequencydS4�Code:WG-Weekir^Garbgge:r=0WG-€u yComer"neco iarbage:VoL--Mmtllty GwtmF;W'n=tHee"Kecdng ECrWr=E�y Csrm n a&tlrc}r rq MR-Lknt ty Pamy ung:Usi auws iaea by mnnaer Nolo 1: Descriptiown-iles related to recycling program ase show on page 25- Note 2: Descripnown-iles related to yardwasle program are shown on page 2$. Note 3: In addition to the recycling rates shown above,a recycling deb&(credil)of(50.16)(A)applies- Note 4:Recycling rates shcwr7 above are subject to an,addiltional rec}drg pnacBsEslg surcharge of$0.55 per month- The recycling processing s•rdiarge on this page wits expire:dacamnber 31,21318 Recycling reties an this page score on: January J1,2014 lisswed By: Ride WeldFen,Business Unit Controller Issue[late: June 1&2018 Effecdue Clare: RU a,=_t 1,201 b (For OfJicrat Use OnJ}+ Docket NG.TG- date: By: LOO r)FFIC'I-iL LY �8 {;rumen, I'iriffRel-asreras per Order Q1 rr? Lhwket 76-18884 Agenda Dare_Juh,26.21018 Effee'dr>,-e.Clore:Aagm t 1, 2018 Att A Page 392 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 RE[:1:I'4rt':1) NOV 15, 2016 WA. LIT. & TRANS. COMM. ORJG1N 1L TG-im 214 A Jt AT/71/117 tariff No_ 11 5th Ravi sed Page Nod.39 Company Narrre Perrrot Ni-amber_ Rabaamoo LTU G-12 Registered tram NaS 6mftae as Cort n 1-InAnS Hzanm es.F+rba Canrwd� 1twn 2Sa—0IS005ad Fees Charges!n this oem apply wmr,serer!terns In the tared specrLcally rarer to this Item. Disposal site name or location ?vrae f.,+ a+.er,al t=ea for Olsposai KtrH3 County Vanslar s<auonsand landMis 'J:::L, c: X5134.59 per tan King County transler stations and IandilWs s-u.r;vwaa9e 14v-"-C Dr! tan King County transfer stations and landfills v!ru°.vas.te S75'if-'uo "ulI Rabanoo Transfer Station 4aa.'�j4 e v 1.s; ,'_Dc. !.: F=anoa Transler Stawn GDL 1.75 uc-! %:i! Rabanco Transfer Statrar, .ard1uas.te v5:�5-a_r! 1,71 Stack Nver Transfer Stali:w C!vL v�'5.75::c! :. Land Recovafy Inc. rth!r:!i-jrti Cliai u v-C"; �11! 'qac$ Land Romvitqy rrlc. L'eir-DI I:u-i+,Uuu-.,� '".11 Land Recovery Inc. C r}I _cls& :'Jr;:- c 1 .M 7 1m r�Iu Seattle Transfer Statro" A Jl : c r-9.=7,."_-I :UII Cedar Grove Com brr .IrIC. k 7'::,"1'_l.: vD-- Sri uo :t±;1 Stats whetiner fens are per yard, per ton,etc. Irrtdusde charges assasmd tar spaual Corn Mocd!es it!i es. appt!anom.ashestos,ate.)or specral conditions at each specific disposal site. Attacrr adc!t!ar!al sheets as necessary. Issued Ry: Rick Waldren.Business Unit Comratler mue Bate: filo+rearlber 16,201$ btlectiwe bate. Januar 1,2017 (Prrr of dar Use ) Owmi No_TG- Date. By: FOR OFFICIAL t SE ONL Y D(xkef: FG-161214 Agenda Dare: Jan uary-26, 21)7 Effective Date:.lrrraxrrrx),1. 2017 Att A Page 393 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Fiorito Enterprises, Inc. and Rabanco Companies G-Permit G-60 https://www.utc.wa.gov/regulatedi ndustries/transportation/TransportationDocuments/Fiorito%2OEnt. %20Raba nco%20Co%20dba%20Kent-Merid ian%20DisP%20G-60%20Tariff%20No%2027.pdf Serves unincorporated King County RECEIVED MAV 31, 2018 WA. UZ`.& TRANS. COMM.ORIGINAL TG-184485 SUB 07/12/18 TariFF No. 27 251, Rr,,isec Page No. 21 Company NamruPrinnil Number: Fordo ErMptses lm.a Rtlar-Cnmpaiws.tsrn Regismwed Trade Nance s K.,a4 b,,JW dbpeaal comps„r,Acrd was-servoasctHrni.a sorcr..^a hem 100-Residereial Service--I ufft Rales I oontinued on nag pace: Rates in th+s item eppry-. fl}To solid waste collection,c=Ehds fecycling(where rioted)and yaidwasle sernres rwhere noted)for residential property. This includes single family dwellings,duplexes.apartments.motiL-homes. conciominiuTns,etc.,where service,s billed dlrmtly to tine occupant of each residential unh.aridfor (21 Wtten mgLwed by a local govEmmerd Ear crce level ordinance.,solid waste oNlenccn.c mbside req,aing,.and yardwasle serwiae must be provided for single-faddy,dvm1lings.duplexes.mobile homes, condominiums,and apartment buildings of less than 4 residential units where seance is bSed to the prop"owner or manager. Rates below apply in the lotlowing service area: Appendix A H-b6c A Feequero_y G..tow ies}cle Yiw'dwasle- <:p6- Lh6 cr Type �f 8.- !L- r],gaer:s cunt-, of earriamds Scr,i Pk Fuk S-kat Ht. 20 galk3n ran W =C4;'R $9.79 $7.90 $9.22 51-02 Karr 'A"-=C,';R $16.05 $7.90 $6.22 30-65 2Can 'N _ a''R $25.90 $7.90 59.22 51-31 3Can 4": =_',;%,R $37.19 37.90 59.22 ,S1-96 4Cas :,,NR $39.56 3,.90 $9.22 S2J31 S Cart _.:;'rdR $58.05 $7.90 $9.22 33.26 32 Ca To-L- �','R $14.77 $7.90 $9.22 $127 64 i.= f.re,. =:',ttiFR $2126 37.910 59.22 5127 Vi Gra-To-e =,r?;vR 531.92 37.90 $9.22 .5127 1 Can li'aiF1-)-,V3 516.78 $7.90 $9.22 30'n Rec Only 39.04 Yattivasie Only I F myx�mgar S--Cods:w G=Vme jyLNy,li. WM:iW"6 . Garbage"wrtrWa1lAly He� LCMH=-V CI.ner dh' *fdenrimq W,Monhgp^ft.-Y.Wlg L.1o14,uaa-d fn rmmpanr: Note t: Oesmiptionhules related is recydi g,program are mown on pagie23_ Not 2: DescrWborvrules related ie yardweste pmgrarn are shown on page 24. Note 3: in addition to the recycling rates s1no m above.a recycl mg oebiLifcredit)of(50.14X,A)aloplies Note 4:Recyang rates shown above are sut>leet to an addihonal recycling proDmaing surcharge of$0.54 per month. The recycling processing surcharge on lInts.page will expire:december 31,2418 Recycling rates on this page expire on: Jartuary31,2019 Issued By: Rick Waklren,Business Lira C:-nuoller Issue Date: June 15,2019 Effeciwe[Dale: Augusi 1.2L 1`a (For Oi7Fciaf Use 0myJ fJotlke7 No.TC- Delle: By: VOR 01-PI"VL'�FL Y Dvelrer:16-18048i Grawing Tariff Anrzsioru per-Order 01 in Dor-ket TG-1804,4' Agenda Line:July 26,21)18 Effec•riiw Lktee. Aurgum 1,018 Att A Page 394 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 RECEIVEDNOV 15, 2016 'A. 11T. & -rRAN . comm. ORIGINAL TG-161217 SUR 12/14/16 Tanff No. 27 8t1a Rawlsee Page No. 38 Company NameiFerrmit Nu mb@r fluff Effwp�.Bc.a ream i ,ria IRENL,startd Trade Names Kerri.iwarzkm ompmai CampwV,Amd wzsk Semcm d F�t 3 Faera:mE Semi d Kt k Item 23U—Oloosal Fees Charges inthis item apply when;othar ftems in the tariff speufically refer to this idem. aisgasal sKe(mama or location) Type of Uaeerial. Fea for Disposal King County iranslear sdarions and Landfills garba $1,34.59 per ton A King County transfer star ions and Landfills spedal waste $162.00 per ton(A) Rahar►ca 7rari9w Station garba" $134.5 r tcm A Rabaw Transfer Station COL $22.23 pef Ion A ®lack Riser TransW Slatiam COL $flom W Ion h -udar Grove COMPOSHN,Inc. yaidwasta .13.95 partm A :.ata whel her fees are per yard,Per wn.elc. Ifid uda chaiges assessed for special 60mmuaiibar.{tires. �plianc_.= asheslos,etc.)Of special candiGons at each specific disposal rile. A"rh add itional sheets ds viiiCeSSary. Issued Hy Rick Nfaldren.C)lvision Cor&0w Issue t7ate. November 15,20115 Etteective Dale_ January 1' 2017 fPor 00icraf Use Olwy) Docket No.,TG- Data. fay 1ifJ X11 !dCL=1 r. . ONLY Docket: I Agenda Dale: f ecember E eefive Date Jranuan, 1, Nil e' Att A Page 395 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Rabanco LTD, G-12 https://www.utc.wa.gov/regulatedi ndustries/transportation/TransportationDocuments/R%20LTD/20- 20AI I i ed%20Waste%20of%20Ke nt%2c%20Ra ba nco%20Cos%2c%20SeaTac%20D is p%20G- 12%20Ta r iff%2026.pdf Serves unincorporated King County and Black Diamond RECEIVED MAY 31, 2018 WA. i1T-& TRANS. COMM.ORIGINAL TC-180487 SUB 07/12/18 Tariff No. 216 1 Tth Revised Page No. 21 Company NamelParmilNumber: raacaxotTnanx Registered Trade Name(s) FN=&k Ser-Raban-ca+cor-sal roc DW-W Item 106-ResidentiRl SeryicE-MaDj*Rates I continued on next paget Rates,in his item sppf r (1 J To solid waste colie cion,curbside recycling(where rested)and yamMaSte ser"Das(where nosed)for Tesldendal property. This includes single lemily dwellings,duplexes.apartments,mobile homfs, condominiums,el r-,where service is killed niredtly to he occupant df each Tesinerilial unrL arxsjor (2F 1Nlwin reed by a local govemmenl service lerel ordinance soba waste cedtecfiw.c4xbr de recycling-and yardwaetE Service must he provided for single-famMy dwellings,duplexes,mobile homes. coMominhmis,and apertareont buildings of less than 4 resldentiai units_where service ib hired to toe prop"owner or manager Rates below apply in the following service area: Appendix k WIN!-M Rei" 7.M-t- Opsdua Lk-rra 9 Semcr Carrtainer of Cwrtamas Sernca R ft R.W� S-R�ir. rima 20 gallon ran W&E-OWR $10-78 $7 t':. 99.99 $0-44 1 Can WGIEOWR $15.54 $7.i: "s9.99 $0.55 2Gat WGJEDWR $26.17 $7.0£ 99.99 $1.11 Scan WG( ChNR '$37.77 $7.06 39.99 $1.55 4Can W&EOWR $50.5t $7.W 39.99 S2 Scan WC-WEOWR $81.53 $7.06 89.99 5_ ' 32 Gal Tatar W&EOWR $15-54 $7.06 Si GA Gal Toler WGlEOWR $23.23 $7.06 96 Gal Ti ler W&ECOR $3274 $7.68 39.E S1.66 1 Can )ACrrEOWR $6.68 $7.06 G9.99 $055 Reqjcle Only ' YdrdwaLte Ordy 511:00 $1-51 Fmgaaicyraf Senwe Cc�tla YYf�l4eca!y�u4ax:�Ci+Ft i. ..:_aha�4ecs�arhagc�MS.;=hh�f.`ib Gar0.ye:P1fx�Weekly�Serystr�, fko icing'WR-Kfk nlFdJ -1 H--d et ccmWr+: Now t: t=leacaipdonrrulas related in regUang program ares shown on page23. Noce 2. DiRsoripdorbl ales related to yarowaste program are strawn on page 24. Nate 3: In addition to the recycling rales stown above.,a recydtrg debirUlcredi0 of($0.16XA)applies. Nate 4:Recycling rates shown above are subpc.1 to an additional recycling processing surcharge of$0.45 per month. The recycling processing surc"e on thispage will expire:Decam,ber31,201® Recycling rabBE on this page expha bn: Jarwary Si,2019 Issued By: Rick 4Waldren,Business IJnil Controller ISSUE Date: June 15.2678 Effeexiwe DeAB- Ac:c.=: --8 (Ear Officiar Use O.v)yi - Docket No.TG- Dale: By: FOR OFFI(I4L L1.E ON LV Doekei-7°G-1804.87 ICrrrrnnng 1`sari/f Rd1isions per Order 01 in Docket 7'0-180487 Agenda Uure:July 26,20)8 Effecdive Date:Airgirst 1,2018 Att A Page 396 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 RECEIVED MAY 31, 2018 WA. LJ•r. TRANS, COMM. ORIGINAL l (;-181114 SUB 07112/18 -arllf N0. 25 19th Revised Page No. 2` Company Namerlxermn Number. Rstr�am rxiz tiered'Trade Na s) RrysaNrt S*Na Raeu forco�sa.+Tac ISWC eesn FUD—ResideFffid Service—Mmlhtr Rates fcarNRued an next papal Rates-n this Siam apply. +:•T'0 sclid waste eollectan,ctrb&de recyckig;mhefe mated)and yard asle services(whefe noted;far resxiemiaf propeny Thls Includes Bangle family dwelling%duplaxes,apanrnenls.,n ifte hornes u Acirnimr mis.etc.,where service ka billed directly to the occupar'A or each fesideni al unit.arid'y ..,erg.required by a local g0ueirunant serAce k-M ordinance,solid wasle e&r L-dion,curbside ecyclinq and yardwsste service must be provided for singledarnVy dwet rigs,duplexes,mobile hcrms. aztdaminwre,ail apartment bulkRigs of less Ihan 4 resldeniia units.where serve*Is orlled try ane jfcgerty owner or fnenregar- Rates Below apply in the IdicA ing service area: AppamAix rL— A srv..qc Rae.*:. ra-d— v.axuwlu 'x31 ar;',79 U acral See" S,:Ram ugwAm CA cogmit Sartre Rse !Ea ialt 06 mO - 2D pialloncan NC,1E0Y0FV.','.. - 87.66 $12.39 $13m _ 1 Gan w,!!E0d0R4ti1':• £7.06 512.39 51385 2 Can 0,G,ECWRA11'W4 39 Sy a aj . 3 Can 4r' ECOHANYW -' 3;.06 39 n13 aj •Can A)aE0VfFbA-YW 51'_aj ..... 5 Can WG' E6•/IFV%Nti A 513 35 32Ga1Tolef 04a'E(7hR*":, - 57A6 39 513.a5 54 Gal Totef %%S-ECYARN.^.. - 37.06 _ 39 513 aj Ual Tom, 6hU'MYOFblhNW4Can AJGE--W4R1eV/0 5r3.i�3 3.-.Q;3 39 513.as 'Dflr $8.19 +.c-w.w., .i .-�.�o�ac:W[is4Matl7�-��b°BK eQxCa-enc+y cirrr fi:•_, . .r .s.,.-, .. ....�..,r-- z"•fieaY�p RraYYdr'8 �U6µR�wrY[1Gw Waif Racyunp,AJA=►k�r±Yie Regran7.>_aiosscn�hryi can�arrr. Note 1: Deservptto Wales nelated b recycling program are shown art page 29. Note 2: DescrNioffdfulesrNaled to Fiedwaste program are shown an page 317. Note 3: In adUdvon to the recy ,ng rates ahDw l anove,a fecycamg dabtr(rredil)of(W-19)SA)applies Nate 4:Recyc g rates shown above are sab)ecl Ie an addvoftal recycling mcassng su+criarge of HAS per o orm. Tire recycling processing surcharge on Chis page YM expire.DscarmLar 31,2616 R_-uyc:Hy rd!C9 011 INS❑5yc exuiik-On. J,arivaiy 31,2(18 IssLieiPfly- Rich Waldren.ENsaless Unit GofdroGef Issue date: June 15.ZDta EfEecilvre Date: Alqual 1,2W3 fFW om6w use Clay) Doekat No.TG Dale: ey FOR OFFICIAL USE 0r1'L Y Dacket: TG-180487 Granting Tariff Retiisiutrs per Order 01 in Dcxket 76-180487 Agenda,Date:Jid-1!26,2'0!6 E -eceive Date:Atrglsst 1, 2118 Att A Page 397 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 RECEIVED NOV 15, 2016 WA. UT. & TRANS. COMM. ORIGINAL TG-161216 SUB 12114116 Tariff No. 26 9411 Revlsed Page Pto_ as Company Name,Verrtmt Number- Ab.LTD G 12 kagistdred Trade Namefs Republic Sir .r e�-%a amomamal Item 23D-Disposal Fees Crrar-ges in Ibis item apply whets otlser mems in the tariff specrrically refer to Ittis Ilan_ gii,pasal sd6e(name or locaiiun� Type of Malertar Fee fbi DiSposd; Kj ncl Couf ity Mans or s!arlum and Landfills garbage 5134.59 per ton iA? Krn4 Cou'rity lid iis'r r staiioM and Landfills specaal wabW 5162.00 per tbfi(A:- RaVariW Trdrrsrri 54atiorr yarbag L! 5134.59 per ton A) RaharHm Transfer station CCL $92.23 put',On{Ai 94ack Rivtr Trans,Nr SM bw COL $80.60 put'on�A Cedar Grov9 ConVasting,Im. yalawaslu 40.99 per Lnr1 A State Wbet'her fees are per yard,per tar,.alc. larclude charges assessed for speclaf cormmodllies(tires, appliarroes,asl slos.etc.)Of special nnditibns at saott specific disposal site. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Isfted 13y_ Dick Waldr'iar1.Mvis ion Cont Ilet fasue[gate: Novg2mber 15.2016 E.1rrt.Mv Ddt6. January 1,2G17 (Fct oftd US&OrvJy) oacket FIa_7c� Data. fly- FOR 0FRCL4L USE OVL Y A50kel: M-161216 Agenda Date:December- 2016 E eciii-c Dian: .1imuari-1, 2017 Att A Page 398 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste Management of WA G-237 https://www.utc.wa.gov/regulatedi ndustries/transportation/TransportationDocuments/WM%20- 20North%2OSound%20and%20WM%20-%2OMarysville%20G-237%2OTariff%2019.pdf Serves unincorporated King County and Woodinville RECEIVED MAY 11, 2018 WA- UT.&TRANS-COMM.ORIGINAL TG-180415 Tariff No.19 5th Revised Page No..24 Company Name/Permit Number:Waste Management of Washington,Inc./G-237 Registered Trade Name:Waste Management North Sound and Waste Management bfarvsvil.le Item 1.00-Residential Service-Monthly Rates R f ontinued on next Friel Rates in this item spiply I I l To salad waau uollertion,curbside recy)rl:ng and yardwasic collection services for resudenhal pmpcnty. 'Tlus includes single family&A-cllings,dapirmcs,apennimu,mobile haws,rondominuums,,etc.,where scniee is billed directly to the occupant or each residential unit;anddor 12M Wbm required by a local eovemnnent scn-ire level cudmaocr sand waste collection,curbside rreyelna,and vardwaste srrwcr must he piTwided lou single-f"arnily dwellings,duplexes,,mobile homes,cnndnminmuis and apatunrntbuddingsof less than 5 residential units,Where enrolee rs billed lo the prnperty owner at nnanager. 13)In the tollowrng servtoe arra:The service area required by KinZ county Code Tale I U.wrilanned in 6-237 as desEnhed in Appendix A. Fnegttrnr r of Each 35 Gdm 54 i s_ilao 96 ca;11ae hurdler of i nils or Senice 1Note 21 #;arhgt Additional Reticle Yord%Ate 1 trrd%aste 1•ardw2 le Ltfw of{otrtstucr ll'i kers ict IRrrte Con Senice(Rete 'knice trate Senin Rate Service Rete licrt'afi Al,l:t 11' . :. wb.12 3 'G $1031 $11.33 1 L'�O till,I t}11 d w r_ S$.82 $916 S1015 511.33 I L ar 11(;'r.f7551k 1+.�w $8.82 $416 $10.35 $11.33 - S5.82 $926 $1013 $11.33 ;leu 13(iL0ikR k'3.64 5, 19.'-i, $1035 $11.33 =tz�; 'V6E1144R 54_'.44 S4�' $9.26 $10.35 $11.33 i zr! W6 EOWR $53.56 Sk.w_ $9.26 $1035 $11.33 6 WU10141R $63.53 $S.52 $9.'r, $1035 511.33 1 20Lja.-r,Cart %'GEO1l1 $10.6t 5111.61 SS V S9.26 $1035 $11.33 715-jiL,r.Cart WG'EOWR $l 6o.64 516.64 Sn+= $9.26 $10 35 $11.33 137 sa!I,.m Cart '41610AIIt 9.01 m-a 58.52 $9.26 $1015 511.33 1'-A sul::m Cart 14'GTOWk $110.11 $26.11 $8.82 $9.26 $1015 SI 1.33 T Lill.*1 C'm WGrEOWR $35.51 535.31 $8.82 $9.26 $1035 511.;.? Fivquetky of Senice Lodes. Wfi-Weekly Garbage, EOWR=Every Outer Week R,.- N10,moaiihjy Garbage Demmptiowrules related to ree}clitit program are shown on page 26. Deg riptinn"rules related to yardx asle program are shovm om page 26_ ?dotes For this item are on page 25. RecwL liug rales shown abDve are subject to a recycling<crediv-/debit of<51-622 per ntcmlh for cwtohters in the service areas&scribad in Appendices A and B. ReuVL:lingconerrio&t+ ':n°ti,lnr Irefiampdebitfrhargelonthispage expire;December 31.201.8 Recycling rates shown above are Rubject to an additional recycling prcw,Lgsing surcharge of 54.46 SA?per month.The recycling processing surcharge on this page will expire.October 31,2019(C) Issued by: Michael A.Weiastein,Senior Pricing Manager,Pacific Northwest Market,Area Isauc date.Mayl I,2018 Effect*0dbt�f,1&i1�[ A'QsF$aw f (For Official Use Only) oe el, fG-ftYfH13 Docket No.TG- date: ,genda Dare:July 26,2118 . e . fols Att A Page 399 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 REC'E[V'ED OCT 14, 2016 WA. UT. & TRANS. COMM. ORIGINAL TG-161132 Tariff No_ 19 1 st Revised Page No. 39 Company Name:+Permit Number:Waste Management of Washington,1nc.JG-237 Registered Trade Name: Waste-Management North Sound and.Waste Management-Marysville Item 230- Disposal Fees Charges in this item.apply%%-hen other items in the Gari ff specifically refer to this item., Disposal site(name or lacstian) T e of MHterial Fees for disposal Snohomish County Transfer Stations Msw S 105.40 per ton NGrk-Recyclable CDL S 105.40 per ton Special Waste S 200.00 per tori Shelco Transfer Station VISW $ 105.00 per ton Non-Recyclable CDL S 105.00 p.,r':. Special Waste S 240.40 per tun King County Transfer Stations VISW S 134.59(A)pff ton Special Waste S 162.00(A)per tan WM of Seattle Transfer Station Msw S 134.59(A)per ton CDL Waste S 108.15 PEr tan State whether fees are per yard,per inn,etc. Include charges assessed for special commodities(tires, appliances,asbestos,etc.)or specsal conditions at each specific disposal site_ Attach additional streets as necessary. Issued by: Michael A_Weinstein, Senior Pricing Manaaer,Pacific Northwest.Market.Area FOR OFF]CIA L USE OAT Y Issue date=October 14,2016 Effective date_J &=76113 2 (For 0A'i&&V4 W lt)t4l ewsiarr_i per Order x- el r 32 Docket No.TG- Elate: Age&&Date_-December 8, 2016 ]et wea►e.-, auurrr}• , _017 Att A Page 400 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 Waste Management South Sound G-237 https://www.utc.wa.gov/regulatedi ndustries/transportation/TransportationDocuments/WM%2OSouth %20Sound%20and%20WM%2OSeattle%20G-237%2OTariff%2ONo%2023.pd Serves unincorporated King County, RECEIVED MAY 11,2018 WA_ LIT_ &TRANS_ COMM. ORIGINAL TG-180409 Tariff No.23 7th Revised Page bio_22 Company NamelPermit Number:Waste Management of Washington,IncfCi_237 Registered Trade Name:Waste Management-South Sound and Waste Manag€menu of Seattle Item 100-Residential Service--Moxitki r Rates(Coati nued un next nave) Rale In this Rem Apply: [1) To solid+uaslt collaninn,curisside recyrlingand vardwasmc collection servitts Fur residential propeM This moludes srngk family dwclhnp,duplexes,apartments,mabdc homes,oandomrmums,cic.,where service in billet)directly to thr uocupant of each resadennal unit;ending 1211Y'hen required by a local governmeni service level ordinance solid waste cahtnion,curbside reevelinc,,and vmrdwastt strt,itic must he provided fou single-faintly dweJJinp,duplexci.rnobde honies,condominiums and apartment buildings ol'[oss Ihan s res drrrturl units,where service is billed to the propem owner or maaragen [3)In the f'oilo-wi scrvirr area:K311A Count m described m.41 pend:ix A 35 Gallon 64 Callan 95 Gallon Number of Units or Frequency of Garbage Senice Recede Service Yardw sue Service Yardwaite Yardwasilee Type of Camainer Service Pate Rate (tate. Senice Rate Service Rade Minims 24 ad. MCv'E01v1R'IYY $7.82 0.40 514.00 $11.00 $12.20 1 Can I,IG POWR 41y 58.79 w::,40 $10.00 $11 00 512.20 Mirro-Can[l0 ) AG Ft hR.WY S9.67 59.40 5111.00 S111:1 $1-'.-'U Mini-Car101211 9.al.9 M;F0%k%Y $11 1 S9.441 51{1.00 $1 i tit, 512.211 [can ti!u LiaWk"'Y $19.84 5q.4. 514.00 511.00 512.211 2 Can, NG P.O hQ kk 1 $28.66 S I0_[IO $19.00 912.20 3 Cans kkG LQi1'R tt.i S R i Y>.4i1 S 10.00 S-11.00 S11-1-0 4 Cares WGrEo%4 R k';1 59.40 510.00 511.00 l! 5 Carte At;1:1711 k t4 Y 159.61 $9.44 $14_00 511.00 $12. 11 120 gallon= 116'l:tAQWy S�.R' $9.44 $10-00 $11 IV $12.24 [24 gaftmcari th[;LC)t4'ku'4' $13.3? 59.44 514.00 S1:, 512.20 135 oloncan MGEQNR'1VY $9.71 _ °, $14.00 $111.16 512.20 135 galloncari WG:EOWR'WY $20.6, ti'-.4,i 514.00 $11.00 $12-20 1164 pAlca ea WG:EOWRa'tS Y $30.3: 59.4t1 514.00 $11.00 512.20 196 g@IILln ear. 11(;!-,OWR,WY 541.61 $9.44 S[4.00 $11.00 512.24 Frequenov of�,crti itic Godes 4w'{,i=Werkiv Grrrbagr;EOWC'e--Every(Aher Week Crwbage;MG=Morrthly fiarbage, LOWR=L,en Ciftr W sxl:Rrryolin&WY=Weekly Yard Waste Notes for dn.,iicrn are on page 23. 1 ic_ticriptiOR rule,related to recycling program are shown on page Zd_ De cvipturrt't tilus related to vatdwraste program are shown,on page 24_ Recycling rates shown above are subject to a recycling-f4-�redit>;debit of X1.42 per rrionth for eastonwrs in the s0ervice areas de-wribed in AWndcx A. Remling--credit=ddebit adjustments above an this We expire. rk-cern tier 31.2018. Recycling rates shi)wm above are sultijetr torn additional recycling processing swcharge of 30.8 1IAI per month The Nt:ycling prUVa%ng Slrchatge on this page will expire.Ocmbt.r 31,2018{C) Issued by: Michael A.Weinstein,Senior Pricing Manager,Pacific Northwest Market Urea Issue date:May 11,2:018 C:rfeclyq¢gtp�%rk}8yastl{l f }1 � 'f_Y (For Official Uw Only) Docker_" 1-6486409 Dricket No_TG- Late: Oi;Ireyeda Lhiee:Ady 26,2018 r`f rzie D. ooc:Auzzivt 1. 2018 Att A Page 401 Ordinance 18893 Updated April 17,2019 RECEIVED OCT 14, 2016 WA. UT. & TRANS.COMM. ORIGINAL '1'C-161134 Tariff No. 23 1st Revised Page No. 34 Company NanneiPermit Number. Waste Management of Washington,Inc./G-237 Registered Trade Name: Waste Management South Sound and Waste Management-Seattle Item 230 Disposal Fees Charges in this item apply when other items in the tariff specifically refer to this item. Disposal site(name or location) Type of Material Fees for disposa I Icing County Transfer Station MsW is 134.59(A)per toil Special Waste $1.62.00(A)per ton WM of Seattle Transfer Station MSW $ 134.59(A)per ton King County CUL Waste $ 108.15(A)perton State whether fees are per yard,per ton,etc. Include charges assessed for special commodities(tires. appliances,asbestos,etc.)or special conditions at each specific disposal site_ Attach additional she,•i a:- -'r-.L, ,:sary. Issued by: Michael A. Weinstein, Senior Pricing Manager,Pacific Northwest.Market Area Issue date_October 14,2016 Effecti,&"f" OAT f' (Far O�;.� 11 C�,�v 3 4 t7hj:ttl 7ttTrftReri.Sians'perOrder01 Dark-ei #G-161134 Agenda Date-- 8,December , '#116 Duc et No. TG- Date: rT I Iffy 1" trrnYrnrt off Att A Page 402 Ordinance 18893 ... -. April • TRKing County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Solid Waste Division COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: _ 5d - CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DILL SUBJECT: Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control-Traffic Control Center—Bid Award POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council award the Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control-Traffic Control Center project to the lowest responsive,responsible bidder? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: September 9,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Rick Perez.. P.L., City Traffic Engineer Manager i DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: 1. Award the Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control-Traffic Control Center project to Shaiman Contracting, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $109,907.61 and approve a contingency of$11,092.39 for a total of$121,000.00, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2. Reject the bid for the Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control-Traffic Control Center project and direct staff to rebid the project and return to Committee for further action. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor lie mmends approval of Option 1. c MAYOR APPROVAL: / 1 I S (r d DIRECTOR APPROVAL: / G'rirna4i�tce Cnu]�[ Initial/Date Initial/Date lnitial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. F.n Mark Koppang, Committee Chair Je ohnson,Committee Member Hoang Tran, olnmittee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to award the Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control-Traffic Control Center to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of$109,907.61 and approve a contingency of$11,092.39 for a total of$121,000.00, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2019 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor .rte FROM: EJ Walsh, P.E.,Director of Public Works' Rick Perez, P.E., City Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control=l raffic Control Center—Authorization to Bid Award Financial Impacts: The Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control -Traffic Control Center (TCC) project is fully funded in the Capital Improvement budget (Project 202 &203). In accordance, with the approved budget, this item is funded with $1.76 million from federal grants and $240,000 of City Utility Tax funds for match. This project is one of the three phases of the project. The system operational costs will be paid out of Street fund. Background Information: The adaptive traffic control system is a system that monitors traffic conditions in real time and modifies signal timing every signal cycle. This reduces delays and stops,thus improving air quality and safety. The City Council previously authorized to bid the project at the City Council meeting dated August 14, 2018. The other two phases of the project are: 1. System Software; and 2. Construction of the field equipment to support the system software and Traffic Management Center operations. The Request for Bids was solicited from July 19,2019 and bids were opened on August 9, 2019 for the project. Two bids were received for the project.The lowest responsive,responsible bidder is Shaiman Contracting, Inc.with a total bid of$109,907.61. AVAILABLE FUNDING: Project 202 & 203 $2,000,000.00* Total Available Funding $2,000,000.00 *For all Three Phases of the project PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: The following is a breakdown of the estimated total project costs based on the low bid: Citywide Adaptive Traffic Signal Control- $109,907.61 Traffic Control Center Construction Contingency $11,092.39 Total Project Costs $121,000.00 Rev.6/2019 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 9, 2019 ITEM#:-5e CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:AUTHORIZATION TO increase budget for SWM Project 304-3100-288: SWM Comp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study 1. POLICY QUESTION: Should city council authorize the reallocation of funds from the unallocated SWM fund to increase the budget for SWM Project 304 – 3100 – 287: SWM Comp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: September 9, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF,REPORT BY: Theresa Thurlow,P.E. SWM Manager AA/--1 DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: 1. Authorize the reallocation of funds from unallocated SWM fund to increase the budget for SWM Project 304–3100–287 SWM Comp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study. 2. Do not authorize the reallocation of funds and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: ' =� DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ` �/ g(- ly Co mi Council Initial/Date Initial/Date lniIi"A.7D,te COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option I to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. V \A 0 � � Mark hoppaii,. Committee Chair Jes{e .loll) oii.Committee Member I-Ioarlj) Tran, onunittee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "1 move to authorize the reallocation of funds from unallocated SWMfund to increase the budget for SWMProject 304–3100–287 SWMComp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED-12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: EJ Walsh, P.E., Director of Public Works/_� Theresa Thurlow,P.E., SWM Managerj� SUBJECT: Authorization to increase budget for SWM Project 304-3100-288: SWM Comp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Staff proposes to transfer funds from the SWM unallocated fund account in the amount of$39,904.00 to fund the SWM Comprehensive Plan Update. At the end of 2018 the balance in the SWM unallocated fund was$171,058.00. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)Western Washington Phase II municipal stormwater permit was issued on August 1,2019. In anticipation of the increased requirements in the new permit, SWM hired a consultant to evaluate the surface water program, facilities, and watershed needs. This project was included in the 2017 SWM CEP Update approved by City Council on June 20, 2017. Under the original plan,the update to the SWM Comprehensive Plan was not included within the Scope of Work(SOW)to be done by the consultant. The original SOW included an update to the SWM CIP and a program gap analysis to determine what changes in the SWM program were required to meet the new NPDES Phase Il permit. Analysis of the SWM Utility rate was also included in the original SOW. Using the data generated from the project, it was anticipated that the update to the SWM Comprehensive Plan would be done by SWM Staff in-house. However,due to the recent Public Works Department reorganization and staff turnover, SWM no longer has the capacity to perform this task in house. As the SWM Comprehensive Plan Update is dependent on work being done under project 304-3100-278, SWM staff proposes an increase in the project budget. This will allow Staff to amend the contract to include update to the SWM Comp Plan. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 5f CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2020—2027 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM(CIP) UPDATE POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council approve the proposed 2020-2027 SWM Capital Improvement Program update? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: September 9, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Theresa Thurlow, P.E. Surface Water Management, f ADEPT: Public Works Division Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: 1. Adopt the proposed 2020-2027 update to the SWM Capital Improvement Program. 2. Do not adopt the proposed 2020-2026 update to the SWM Capital Improvement Program and provide direction to Staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the September 17, 2019 City Council Consent agend MAYOR APPROVAL: S S DIRECTOR APPROVAL: $ 3ol 1)_/n Cofnmillle couu cil Initial/Date Initial/Date Initial/Dale COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. V i c� 7Ln p to Mark Koppang, Committee Chair Jes Johnson, Committee Member Hoang Tran,Kommittee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the 2020-2027 Surface Water Management Capital Improvement Program update" (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor EJ Walsh,P.E.,Director of Public Works FROM: Theresa Thurlow, P.E., SWM Manager_�. SUBJECT- 2020-2027 Surface Water Management(SWM)Capital Improvement Program(CIP) Update FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Included in the proposed 2020-2027 SWM CIP update are two possibilities. The recommended option is to fully fund the proposed SWM CIP as is. Another option would be to fund only those projects identified as meeting minimum needs. Minimum needs include maintaining City drainage infrastructure, repair and/or rehabilitation of failing infrastructure, reduction or prevention of flooding, and projects identified as a result of regulatory requirements. Both fully funded and partially funded SWM CIP updates will require a rate adjustment to the SWM Utility. The necessary adjustments to the SWM Utility fee will be presented as a stand-alone item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The purpose of the SWM Capital Improvement Plan(CIP) is to identify, design, and construct surface water related projects that will enable the City to continue meeting both its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)Phase II permit requirements and surface water related needs of the citizens of Federal Way. While it is the intent of the SWM utility to construct the SWM CIP Projects as scheduled, CIP projects may at times be advanced, delayed, removed, added or modified based on unforeseen infrastructure failure, new information gathered through engineering studies, operational observations, permit monitoring and continual re-evaluation of our surface water related needs. The most recent SWM CIP update was approved June 20, 2017 and since that time, six of the projects planned for 2017-2019 have been completed. 2017—2019 Completed Projects • Phase V Highway 99 Project—S 3441h St at Highway 99 • Lakota Berm and Pipe Repair • 373`d Bridge stream gravel removal • 2018 CCTV Conveyance System Evaluation and Assessment • Brooklake Connector(Estimated completion September 27,2019) • 2019 Pipe Rehabilitation Project Phase I One of the projects approved under the 2017 CIP Update was the SWM Comp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study. Task 5 under the scope of work was to evaluate the surface water program, facilities, and September 9,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Award of Contract—Solid Waste Collection Services Page 2 watershed needs. The scope of work also included development of a prioritization matrix for all proposed CIP projects. Using the evaluation and the prioritized matrix,the consultant provided a proposed update to the SWM Capital Improvement Program. Attachment 1 provides a summary of the current,revised, removed, and or new projects in the 2020—2027 SWM CIP update as developed by the consultant. Attachment 2 provides the summary sheets for each project. For the 2020-2027 SWM CIP Update,the proposed changes are as follows: Proposed Projects to be Removed: Project 304-3100-282: Highway 99 and 336"tightline and Water Quality Facility This project required Army Corps of Engineering as well as Washington Fish and Wildlife permitting. Both permitting agencies have indicated that current scope of work for this project is not beneficial to stream and salmon recovery efforts within the West Hylebos watershed. Proposed Proiect Additions 1. Public Works Complex Federal way was incorporated in 1990. Since then the city has experienced significant growth.The city's population has grown from 67,000 in 1990 to almost 100,000 now. With annexations over the last 29 years,the city's area has grown from 20 square miles to more than 22 square miles. The city is anticipated to continue to grow in the future. Currently, Public Works and Parks office staff are housed in city hall while Public Works and Parks maintenance crews are in a separate maintenance facility. The capacities of both locations are maxed out. Additional room is needed in order to maintain required level of services. This project will build new facilities on a yet to be determined site that may house both office staff and maintenance crews. Although this proposed project would be funded through the SWM Utility,the utility fund would be reimbursed based on final occupancy. Occupancy and lease terms are to be determined. 2. Cold Creek Culvert Replacement The Marine Hills culvert in Cold Creek downstream of SR 509 near the Marine Hills pool is over 40 years old, is at the tail end of its lifespan, has deteriorated, and needs to be replaced. In addition,the Cold Creek drainage basin is over 30 percent impervious, field observations indicate the hydrology is very flashy, and sediment deposition is a problem that requires frequent dredging by the City to maintain culvert capacity. Stormwater crews remove 10-15 CY of sediment from the upstream end of the Dash Point Rd. culvert each year(the culvert directly upstream of the Marine Hills culvert). Also, restoring aquatic habitat throughout Cold Creek is a long-term goal of the City. Per the W�1)r-,T Fish Passage Inventory,the Dash Point Rd. culvert(991192) is identified as a total fish p;:1s,a .0 harrier.The Marine Hills culvert is also a fish passage barrier. 3. Redondo C'recl; CultEnt The Redondo Creek culvert at 16th Ave S has failed;there is a large(6 inch)joint separation 20 ft from the downstream end of the culvert.This has been a known issue for 5 to 10 years and seems somewhat stable. The culvert conveys Redondo Creek under a utility access driveway and water and sewer lines cross the creek at the culvert location. If the road fails during a large flow event,there is a risk to water or sewer line damage due to the lines crossing the culvert. The existing culvert is mapped as a fish passage barrier due to slope. 4. Outfall 4256 Erosion Prevention Project The outfall is located at the top of a slope and without stabilization further erosion could result in slope instability along the edge of the erosion channel extending a horizontal distance approximately equal to the depth of the channel. Localized areas of instability may result in shallow failures directly adjacent to September 9,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Award of Contract—Solid Waste Collection Services Page 3 the erosion channel with an estimated channel scour of 0.5 to 1.5 inches per year. Geotech investigations recommended full stabilization by installing a system to convey stormwater from the top of the slope to the base. This project will connect the two existing concrete pipes at the top of the slope to a new type-2 catch basin and install a 12 inch storm pipe from the top of the slope to the base to convey stormwater. An energy dissipater will also be installed at the base of the slope where the new outfall of the pipe will be located to reduce erosion and slow down the stormwater exiting the new pipe. 5. Cit\wide 'Vater Q11,1 I t% Vlonitorin There are five freshwater streams within the City of Federal Way that are designated as Category 5 on the 303(d) list. Pursuant to the standards set forth under the Clean Water Act,the city is required to make all known, available, and reasonable efforts to return these waters to their beneficial use. In order to achieve this,water quality monitoring data must be collected to inform source identification for pollutants and determine a course of action for water quality improvement. This project will install water quality monitoring stations at various selected locations throughout the city. 6. 33'P1 S Drainage Improvements This area experiences chronic minor flooding that affects private lawns. The grade in the areas is very flat and infiltration galleries were installed about 10 years ago, but have not resolved flooding issues,which indicates infiltration may not be a feasible solution. There is no access to the nearby lake for a new outfall. If monitoring of flooding in the area merits the cost of extending the stormwater pipe,project will extend the conveyance system westward to improve drainage conditions. 7. 324`x'and 99 Drainage Improvements Street flooding has occurred along Highway 99 just north of S 324th Street during intense rainfall events. Most recently, flooding occurred in July that closed a portion of Highway 99 and blew storm lids off their frames.The cause of the problem is not known. No obstructions were found in the pipe during inspections. This project will include three phases: a drainage study with modeling and alternatives assessment, design, and construction. Two options will be considered during the modeling phase: Increase capacity in the system or provide upstream retention. Modeling is required to identify the location of capacity 8. Upsize pipes at SW Campus Di- West SW Two storm drain laterals on SW Campus Dr. West are undersized and cause flooding in the roadway. Due to the recent HMA overlay on SW Campus Dr. West,the City would prefer to limit impacts to the road surface. Pipe bursting techniques should be used to replace the existing 8 inch diameter laterals with 12 inch stormwater pipes to increase capacity in the system. 9. .AflntrA Ctrs! of SWM 5ul1par1 to 11u,City's Transportation Improvement Most of the City's Transportation Improvement Programs(TIP) involve some drainage system improvement elements. It is City policy that the SWM utility is responsible for the costs of these drainage improvement elements. SWM utility will provide annual contribution to the City's TIP. 10. Catch Basin_Repair Under the NPDES Phase II permit,the City is required to respond to catch basin (CB) maintenance and repair requirements within a set time frame once the maintenance and/or repair threshold has been met or exceeded. On average,the City requires up to 30 CB repairs in any given year. This project will provide an on-call service to assist the SWM Utility in meeting repair requirements when in house capacity is exceeded. 11. Neighborhood Drainage Improvements September 9,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Award of Contract—Solid Waste Collection Services Page 4 Older areas of the City have little to no drainage infrastructure or have open conveyance that was filled in over the years. This program would provide funding for small projects where residents could have an above ground water quality facility installed in the right of way in front of their residence to help improve water quality as well as drainage. Residents would be required to agree to maintain the facility. This responsibility would be written into their property title to ensure a requirement for subsequent owners to maintain the installation. 0 0 N $ g S $ O $ O O P O G — O d O x b $ O O N O — $ E s S $ $ o $ 8 e � `e o $ $ v To _3 5 d 0 N ri 0 0 a _ m E o � �C 75 an No` o' z v � O City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: Stormwater Contribution to City of Federal Way Public Works Complex Location: Basin: N/A Number: 40 Date: Priority Score: 24 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $0 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: Federal way was incorporated in 1990. Since then the city has experienced significant growth. The city's population has grown from 67,000 in 1990 to almost 100,000 now. With the annexation over the last 29 years, the city's area has grown from 20 square mile to more than 22 square mile. The city is anticipated to grow more in the future. Currently Public Works office staff are housed in city hall while maintenance crews are in a separate maintenance facility. The capacities of both locations are maxed out. Additional room is needed in order to maintain the level of services. Project Solution: This project will build a new Public Works Complex to house both office staff and maintenance crews. The facility will be constructed seven years from now. Cost Estimate Assumptions: The estimated cost of the facility is $8M. SWM will fund the initial construction cost of the facility. SWM will set aside adequate amount of funds between now then in order to construct the facility. Stormwater Contribution to City of Federal Way Page 54 of 78 Public Works Complex CIP Number: 40 City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Stabilization Location: Cold Creek near 302nd St and 8th Ave Basin: Central Puget Redondo Creek Number: 3 Date: Priority Score: 70 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $3,800,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: The Marine Hills culvert in Cold Creek downstream of SR 509 near the Marine Hills pool is over 40 years old, is at the tail end of its lifespan, has deteriorated, and needs to be replaced. It appears that a slurry was used to temporarily repair the bottom of the culvert over a decade ago. In addition, the Cold Creek drainage basin is over 30 percent impervious, field observations indicate the hydrology is very flashy, and sediment deposition is a problem that requires frequent dredging by the City to maintain culvert capacity. Stormwater crews remove 10-15 CY of sediment from the upstream end of the Dash Point Rd. culvert each year (the culvert directly upstream of the Marine Hills culvert). Also, restoring aquatic habitat throughout Cold Creek is a long-term goal of the City. Per the WSDOT Fish Passage Inventory, the Dash Point Rd. culvert (991192) is identified as a total fish passage barrier. The Marine Hills culvert is also a fish passage barrier. Project Solution: A feasibility investigation and alternatives analysis is necessary to identify the preferred approach for addressing this problem.The feasibility investigation would include hydrologic modeling, geomorphic analysis, review of permit requirements, public participation, consultation with agencies and tribes, conceptual design, and cost estimating. The preferred approach may include a sequence of projects that address upstream erosion and scour issues, install grade controls and channel stabilization downstream, and replace or daylight the culvert under Marine Hills pool. After the preferred solution is identified, the City will begin preliminary design and final design and permitting for the initial phase of construction, followed by subsequent phases of design permitting and construction. Cost Estimate Assumptions: The $3M cost includes an allowance of$500,000 for the feasibility assessment and alternatives analysis, and an allowance of$2,500,000 for final design, permitting, and construction during the planning period. After the feasibility assessment and alternatives analysis is completed funding for design, permitting, and construction should be revisited. The current total project cost includes an additional $760,000 for Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Page 1 of 78 Stabilization CIP Number: 3 construction management, construction administration, construction inspection, and construction contingency. Monday,July 15, 2019 Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Page 2 of 78 8:47:22 AM Stabilization CIP Number: 3 Project Scope Definition: Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Stabilization Vicinity Map: �� 't^r fiP •.�� i i tGit .vT 9�jr ' � r R Marine Hllls Pool A ,k Replace This Deteriorated ' Culvert or Qaylight Cold Creak Through This Area _ TM Frequent Maintenance '+ And Sediment Removal r is Required In These Anus low ,• 10 AN log Legend J' King Federal Way Stormwater CIP Update Euftmgrealure. County Colts Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Stabilization stormwaw pipe Streams and culverts -. '"'t•� � 0 206 410 $2D Feet ccou�nty rl HERRERA King County,Aerial 42017) Monday,July 15, 2019 Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Page 3 of 78 8:47:23 AM Stabilization CIP Number: 3 Project Scope Definition: Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Stabilization Cost Estimate: City of Federal Way, Public Works: Capital Project Project Scope Definition Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Stabilization Authorized Funding SWM CIP $ 1.800,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $ Estimated Construction Cost $2,000,000 Design Cost Site Survey $ - Structural Engineering Review $ Special Studies:Geotech f Asbestos I Haz Mat I Utilities&Structures $ 500,000 Project Design S 500,000 $ 1,000,000 Right of Way Costs ROW Appraisals S - ROW Acquisition $ Other Costs and Commitments Direct Purchase of Material S Direct Purchase of Equipment $ - Other Construction Cost Construction Management 8% $ 160,000 Construction Administration 10% $ 200,000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 200,000 Construction Contingency 10% S 200,000 $ 760,000 TOTAL COSTS DEDUCTED FROM PROJECT FUNDS: $ - Calculated Construction Cost $ 3,800,000 Total Project Cost $ 3,800,000 Monday,July 15, 2019 Cold Creek Culvert Replacements and Channel Page 4 of 78 8:47:23 AM Stabilization CIP Number: 3 City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: S 356th Street Culvert Replacement Location: West Hylebos Creek crossing of S. 356th Street Basin: West Hylebos Number: 16 Date: Priority Score: 66 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $1,200,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: The twin 36-inch culverts have rusted through at the seams causing the pipe bedding and road embankment fill to wash downstream. In addition, if the Brook Lake Dam were to fail, the culvert lacks capacity to convey the flood flow. Soils are soft in this area, so a replacement culvert may need pin pile support or other geotechnical stabilization. Project Solution: Replace the rusted culverts with larger box culverts that meet WDFW fish passage criteria. Consider the potential impacts of Brook Lake Dam failure and whether the culvert can /should be upgraded to convey flood flow. This project will be scheduled to occur with the street widening project for S 356th Street. A dam break alternative analysis will be included as part of the project to consider options such as fortifying the road rather than making the culvert larger. Cost Estimate Assumptions: Cost estimate based on replacement of the culverts with a 50' long by 15' wide fish passable design that can convey the flood flow and permitting for construction in a stream. The cost estimate also includes the cost of hydraulic modeling and the dam failure alternatives assessment. Monday,July 15, 2019 S 356th Street Culvert Replacement Page 24 of 78 8:47:27 AM CIP Number: 16 Project Scope Definition: S 356th Street Culvert Replacement Vicinity Map: Remove Two 36-Inch Diameter Culverts Revegetate Impacted and Replace With A 15'Wide By 5.5' Riparian Areas with Higb Fish Passable Box Culvert Native Plantings(TYP) z Al u tl l f w v. Restore Impacted Asphalt Concrete Roadway to Orfglnal Condition t T ,.d" v ►� `" yule � r *o Legend ring Federal Way Stormwater CIP Update .ir county S 356th Street Culvert Eaiatingfeewrey �,,,...-- �gg, Replacement Stnrmwater pipe ,^-� Suborns and cultinrm 0 37,5 75 150 Proposed feetures `� f Feet Storm drain p.pe Rome AN Proposetl culvert county �, H E R R E RA 'I" ` KingCouMy AerIa112017j Roadway reawration Monday,July 15, 2019 S 356th Street Culvert Replacement Page 25 of 78 8:47:28 AM CIP Number: 16 Project Scope Definition: S 356th Street Culvert Replacement Cost Estimate: City of Federal Way, Public Works: Capital Project Project Scope Definition South 356th Street Culvert Replacement Authorized Funding SWM CIP 5 1,200.000 TOTAL 'RC JECT FI,INDING fi Estimated Construction Cost $ 607,600 Design Cost Site Survey $ 20,000 Structural Engineering Review $ - Special Studies:Geotech/Asbestos I Haz Mat/Utilities&Structures $ 186,000 Project Design $ 120 000 S 326,00U0 Right of Way Costs ROW Appraisals $ - Q(-)VJ AG�Ul�ftfOil S S - Other Costs and Commitments Direct Purchase of Material $ Direct Purchase of Equipment $ Other Construction Cost Construction Management 8% $ 49,000 Construction Administration 10% $ 61,000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 61,000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 61,000 $ 232,000 TOTAL COSTS DEDUCTED FROM PROJECT FUNDS- $ - Calculated Construction Cost $ 1,200,000 Total Project Cost $ 1,200,000 Monday, July 15, 2019 S 356th Street Culvert Replacement Page 26 of 78 8:47:28 AM CIP Number: 16 Engineering Construction Cost Estimate for Conceptual Design Project Name: South 356th Street Culvert Replacement Project Number: 18-06849-000 Client: City of Federal Way Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Update ` 4A Review H E R R E RA Completed/Updated By. Ondre(Sklenar Last Updated On: 4126/2019 Reviewed By Mary Larkin Reviewed On: 4/26/2019 Approved By: Matt Fontaine Approved On: 4/30/2019 Spec Sect./ Spec Item No. Std.Item No. Division Item Description Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Construction Cost Based On Average Unit Cost for Similar Culvert Projects rounded to 1 significant figure) L.S. $ 400,000 Desi n Contingency 40% $ 160.000 00 Subtotal(with Contingency) $ 560.000 Tax 8.5% $ 47,600 Construction Total(with Contingency and Tax) $ 607,600 SurveV L.S. $ 20,000 Geotechnical Evaluation L.S. $ 20.000 Feasibilitv,Alternatives Analysis and H&H Modelin 15% $ 91,000 Design 30% $ 120,000 Permittina L.S $ 75,000 Citv Administration 10% $ 61,000 Construction Management 8% $ 49.000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 61.000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 61.000 Estimated Project Total rounded to nearest 1,OOOth) $ 1,200,000 Cost Estimate Template:Herrera APWA Printed On:7/12/2019 Page 1 of 1 C:\Users\mmullen\Herrera Environmental Consultants\Federal Way Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan,Capital Improvements Program Update and Rate Study-Task_5_CIP\FedlWay_CIP_Cost Estimates Alm City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Location: Redondo Creek 16th Ave S North of Dash Point Rd Basin: Central Puget Redondo Creek Number: 7 Date: Priority Score: 64 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $1,100,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: The Redondo Creek culvert at 16th Ave S has failed: there is a large (6 inch)joint separation 20 ft from the downstream end of the culvert.This has been a known issue for 5 to 10 years and seems somewhat stable.The culvert conveys Redondo Creek under a utility access driveway and water and sewer lines cross the creek at the culvert location. If the road fails during a large flow event, there is a risk to water or sewer line damage due to the lines crossing the culvert. The existing culvert is mapped as a fish passage barrier due to slope. Project Solution: Replace the failed culvert with a fish-passable culvert. Lining the culvert (without replacement) may be feasible from an engineering standpoint but may not be permittable or may required significant mitigation because Redondo Creek is a fish bearing stream. Cost Estimate Assumptions: Cost estimate assumes installation of a 40' long x 15' wide fish passable culvert and allied costs ( feasibility investigation and alternatives analysis, survey, permitting for construction in fish bearing stream (HPA and JARPA application), design, construction, city project management, and construction management. Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave 5 Page 7 of 78 CIP Number: 7 Project Scope Definition: Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Vicinity Map: " Stabilize LipsireamAnd { , oownstrearn Of Replaced Culvert ' y Using Large Wood and Boulders 4 } 1 l, Revegetate Impacted . t Riparian Areas with Native Mantinga(IYP) ,. l 14 i u i 1 � Water and Sewer Lines #. `J 4 * ,r♦ Replace Exuding Failedi # , > Culvert Wlth A Fish . w Passable Box Culvert r Restore Impacted 1 Gravel Roadway To r Original Condition b � A71 Legend King Federal Way Stormwater CIP Update Faatingfeou,rca r� _ 93 County Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Smrmwater pipe Sveam%and Calvert; 0 37.5 75 150 Proposed features n Y Storm drain prpe Ce Feet Plorr � Proposed culvert County t H E R R E RA t_........J Roadw"restoration King County,Aerial J2017) Monday,July 15, 2019 Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Page 8 of 78 8:47:24 AM CIP Number: 7 Project Scope Definition: Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Cost Estimate: City of Federal Way, Public Works: Capital Project Project Scope Definition Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Authorized Funding SWM CIP $ 1,100,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $ Estimated Construction Cost $ 569,625 Design Cost Site Survey $ 20,000 Structural Engineering Review $ - Special Studies-Geotech f Asbestos/Haz Mat!Utilities 8 Structures $ 180,000 Project Design $ 90,000 $ 290,000 Right of Way Costs ROW Appraisals $ ROW Acquisition $ Other Costs and Commitments Direct Purchase of Material $ Direct Purchase of Equipment $ Other Construction Cost Construction Management 8% $ 46,000 Construction Administration 10% $ 57,000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 57,000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 57,000 $ 217,000 TOTAL COs i S DEDUCTED FROM PROJECT FUNDS $ - Calculated Construction Cost $ 1,100.000 Total Project Cost $ 1,100,000 Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Page 9 of 78 CIP Number: 7 Engineering Construction Cost Estimate for Conceptual Design Project Name: Redondo Creek Culvert Replacement at 16th Ave S Project Number: 18-06849-000 Client: City of Federal Way Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Update 4W QA Review H E RR E RA Completed/Updated By: Ondrej Sklenar Last Updated On: 4/26/2019 Reviewed By: Mary Larkin Reviewed On: 4/26/2019 Approved By: Matt Fontaine Approved On: 4/30/2019 Spec Sect./ Spec Item No. Std.Item No. Division Item Description Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Construction Cost Based On Average Unit Cost for Similar Culvert Projects rounded to 1 significant figure) L.S. $ 300,000 Desi n Continciency 75% $ 225,000.00 Subtotal(with Contingency) $ 525.000 Tax 8.5% $ 44,625 Construction Total(with Contingency and Tax) $ 569,625 JSurvey L.S. $ 20.000 Geotechnical Evaluation L.S. $ 20,000 Feasibilitv,Altematives Analvsis and H&H Modelino 15% $ 85,000 Desi n 30% $ 90,000 Permitting L.S. $ 75.000 City Administration 10% $ 57.000 Construction Management 8% $ 46.000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 57,000 Construction Contin encv 10% $ 57,000 Estimated Project Total(rounded to nearest 1,000th) $ 1,100,000 Cost Estimate Template:Herrera APWA Printed On.7/12/2019 Page 1 of 1 C:IUsers4rimullenlHarrera Errvironmenlal Consult-ts\Federal Way Sun—Water Management Comprehensive flan,Capkal Imp rovemants Program Update and Rate Study-Ta5k_5_CIMFedWay_CIP_Gost Estimates dsm City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: Outfall 256 Erosion Prevention Location: At the northwest corner of the intersection of S Number: 2861 St and 13t1 Ave S Problem Description: Following routine outfall inspections a large incised erosion channel was discovered at the top of the slope where stormwater from outfall 256 outfalls. After an evaluation by a private geotechnical engineering firm, Landau & Associates, the following conclusions were determined. The outfall is located at the top of a slope and without stabilization further erosion could result in slope instability along the edge of the erosion channel extending a horizontal distance approximately equal to the depth of the channel. Based on the location of the outfall continued erosion is not expected to impact the global stability of the City's roadway or adjacent residential homes, however localized areas of instability may result in shallow failures directly adjacent to the erosion channel with an estimated channel scour of 0.5 to 1.5 inches per year. Full stabilization by installing a system to convey stormwater from the top of the slope to the base was recommended by Landau &Associates. Project Solution: Based on the recommendations of Landau & Associates the City is proposing to connect the two existing concrete pipes at the top of the slope to a new type-2 catch basin and install a 12 inch storm pipe from the top of the slope to the base to convey stormwater. An energy dissipater will also be installed at the base of the slope where the new outfall of the pipe will be located to reduce erosion and slow down the stormwater exiting the new pipe. Cost Estimate Assumptions: The total estimated cost of the project is $157,020.00 including an estimated design cost of$46,500.00, construction cost of$84,350.00 and a 20% construction contingency of$26,170.00. Outfall 256 Pipe Slope Drain Installation Line Description Quantity Units Unit Price Construction Cost 1 Engineering Design (by the City) 1 EA $ 14,000 $ 14,000 2 Survey 1 EA $ 7,500 $ 7,500 3 4 Geotechnical Report 1 EA $ 10,000 $ 10,000 5 Geotech/Structural Design 1 EA $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Design Subtotal $ 46,500 Construction Items 5 Mobilization 1 LS $ 12,500 $ 12,500 6 Clearing and grading(tree and debris removal) 1 LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000 7 Excavation, including haul 25 CY $ 50 $ 1,250.00 8 Energy dissipater(rock pad) 1 EA $ 2,000 $2,000 9 10 12" Class IV Concrete pipe 25 LF $ 100 $ 2,500 11 12" SaniTite HP Pipe I 150 LF $ 90 $ 13,500 12 54"Type 2 CB 1 EA $ 5,000 $ 5,000 13 Pipe piles with coupling bands 2 EA $ 5,000 $ 10,000 14 Remove and Replace Guard Rail 1 EA $ 2,000 $ 2,000 15 $ - 16 $ - 17 Silt fence 50 LF $ 6 $ 300 18 Site Restoration (revegetation) 1 EA $ 5,000 $ 5,000 19 Construction Entrance/Work Platforms 50 SY $ 30 $ 1,500 20 Connection to Drainage Structure 2 EA $ 1,000 $ 2,000 21 Gravel Backfill for Drains 20 CY $ 50 $ 1,000 22 High Vis Fence 100 LF $ 4 $ 400 23 Inlet Protection 2 EA $ 200 $ 400 24 Construction Management(by the City) 1 LS $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Construction Subtotal $ 84,350 Total0 : 20% Contingency $ 26,170.0 Total $ 157,020.0 i S*284TH ST New outfall location and new energy dissipator 1 Yi New 12 inch storm drain pipc New Storm Drain Structure Existing outfall location & F n rI S 287TH 8T u , N 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet 1 _ l� Legend Open Conveyance }->—> <all other values> Closed Conveyance Trunk, Maintenance Responsibility, Special Mods ► No,Private,None �► No, Public,None City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: South 359th Culvert Replacement Project Location: South of 359th Street Basin: West Hylebos Number: 31 Date: Priority Score: 60 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $890,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: The culvert under S 359th St includes a large upstream control structure and a system of weirs downstream.The control structure may reduce flows downstream. Though the culvert and weirs are not mapped as fish passage barriers, they are not fish-passable due to the drops caused by the downstream weirs. Project Solution: The City would like to replace the culvert and regrade the stream by removing the downstream weirs so that the system is fish-passable and restore in-stream habitat. Cost Estimate Assumptions: Cost estimate based on replacing the culvert with a 40' long by 15' wide fish-passable culvert and regrading the stream.The cost for removing existing structures is expected to be significant. The estimate also includes hydraulic modeling for downstream impacts of removing the existing control structure and weirs and channel roughening downstream due to the high slope. South 359th Culvert Replacement Project Page 34 of 78 CIP Number: 31 Project Scope Definition: South 359th Culvert Replacement Project Vicinity Map: Remove 54-Inch Diameter Culverts and Replace with A 15"Witte By 5.5"High Flsh Passable Box Culvert Revegetate Impacted BII III' Riparian Areas with � u wl :, Native Plantings(TYP) PPF n4 Downstream Channel k I Roughening and . Wood Structure Placement r , Restore Impacted .. �N W ., Asphalt Roadwayto : #- M q M t N. Original Conditionkl " ' 3" 4 .,�" � !'Art F.. . rm T .,•a. .eo„ Ante a �""" d ' y � x e'm ++ v a r' W A , Legend + King Federal Way Stormwater GIP Update faeftinglertures ��, °' County South 359th Culvert Replacement Project S[ormwater pipe Steam's and cultiems Proposed features 0 37.5 75 150 Storm draln prpeFel Come * HERRERA Propos ed Culver[ County \ KingCounty AerlaI12017'I �� RaadKay reetoratibn "�!!' Monday,July 15, 2019 South 359th Culvert Replacement Project Page 35 of 78 8:47:30 AM CIP Number: 31 Project Scope Definition: South 359th Culvert Replacement Project Cost Estimate: City of Federal Way, Public Works: Capital Project Project Scope Definition South 359th Street Culvert Replacement Authorized Funding SWM CIP OCU TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $ Estimated Construction Cost $ 455,700 Design Cost Site Survey $ 10,000 Structural Engineering Review $ - Special Studies:Geotech I Asbestos!Haz Mat I Utilities&Structures $ 158,000 Project De-;win $ 90,000 S 258,000.00 Right of Way Costs ROW Appraisals $ - ROW Acquisition $ Other Costs and Commitments Direct Purchase of Material $ Direct Purchase of Equipment Other Construction Cost Construction Management 8% $ 36,000 Construction Administration 10% $ 46,000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 46,000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 46,000 $ 174,000 TOTAL COSTS DEDUCTED FROM PROJECT FUNDS— S Calculated Construction Cost $ 890,000 Total Project Cost $ 890,000 South 359th Culvert Replacement Project Page 36 of 78 CIP Number: 31 Engineering Construction Cost Estimate for Conceptual Design Project Name: South 359th Street Culvert Replacement Project Number: 18-06849-000 Client: City of Federal Way Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Update QA Review HERRERA Ccmpleted,'Updated By. Ondrej Sklenar Last Updated On: 4/26/2019 Reviewed By: Matt Fontaine Reviewed On: 4/3012019 Approved By: Matt Fontaine Anoroved On: 4/30/2019 Spec Sect.I Spec Item No. Std.Item No. Division Item Descriptio Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Construction Cost Based On Average Unit Cost for Similar Culvert Projects rounded to 1 significant figure L.S. $ 300,000 Desi n Continaencv 40% $ 120,000.00 Subtotal(with Contingency) $ 420.000 Tax 8.5% $ 35,700 Construction Total(with Contingency and Tax) $ 455,700 Survey L.S. $ 10,000 Geotechnical Evaluation L.S. $ 15.000 Feasibility,Alternatives Analysis and H&H Modelin 15% $ 68,000 Design 30% $ 90,000 Permitting L.S. $ 75,000 City Administration 10% $ 46,000 Construction Management 8% $ 37,000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 46,000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 46.000 Estimated Project Total rounded to nearest 1,000th) $ 890,000 Cost Estimate Template:Herrera APWA Printed On:7/12/2019 Page 1 of 1 CAUsersVnmu11-V-1errera Environmental ConsullanlsVFederal Way Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan,Caplial Improvements Program Update and Rate Study-Task 5_CIPTedWay_CIP_Cost Estimates dsm City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: West Hylebos Basin Land Acquisition Location: Creek corridors between S 356th St and S 373rd St. Basin: West Hylebos Number: 36 Date: Priority Score: 52 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $2,378,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: Project Solution: This project will purchase properties along West Hylebos Creek and North Fork West Hylebos Creek corridors between S 356th St and S 373rd St. The purpose of the project is to protect the creek and its riparian zoon. Some of the parcels have already been acquired by the city. A few parcels are owned by other public agencies such as Lakehaven Utility District or WSDOT. The goal of this project includes acquiring five parcels along the corridor that are currently owned by private owners. Cost Estimate Assumptions: The total 2018 assessed value of the five parcels is approximately $2,378,000. The city plans to set aside $150,000 per year for the acquisition of these parcels. Monday,July 15, 2019 West Hylebos Basin Land Acquisition Page 44 of 78 8:47:31 AM CIP Number: 36 Project Scope Definition: West Hylebos Basin Land Acquisition Vicinity Map: =il 35t3 _ rs 7i+�� n PI m v •r ro M " r. a N v + 9' t r 1Y s 3 3R - W » w =,Nr•�� ^ v ,�x.,,, ,✓4 �.'7�•�` ,,c y 7,f,.1 r N�.( 9•"� R ,�a v�'� _ v n r y • ,r, tea^.. "' • �,f,..„, 'f �*'�* ��' r'�...'1 ,.ry»�~y�+. � fid"'«• a.. .01 ��tih4�A�^+,,�.� ,a'w. � � ®;4 � +A►.'!� may•, A v LegendFederal Way 5tormwater CIP Update c ry West Hylebos Basin Land Streams and culverts .►—`� l Acquisition "wsitton Parcels 0 375 750 1,500 Feet County \ HERRERA King County,Aerial 12010 Monday,July 15, 2019 West Hylebos Basin Land Acquisition Page 45 of 78 8:47:32 AM CIP Number: 36 City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: West Hylebos Educational Center Site Improvements Location: Brook Lake Community Center Basin: West Hylebos Number: 37 Date: Priority Score: 46 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $1,700,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: Project Solution: This project will convert a portion of the Brook Lake Community center site into an education and outreach center focused on stormwater education and environmental stewardship. The site will provide a trailhead location for the expansion of the Hylebos Wetlands Park Trail to the south. This will be a joint project between Surface Water Management and the Parks Department. Both the scope and timing of the project will be highly dependent on grant funding sources. Cost Estimate Assumptions: The itemized cost estimate includes design and constructed improvements to the building including the entrance, driveway, and educational displays. West Hylebos Educational Center Site Page 49 of 78 Improvements CIP Number: 37 Project Scope Definition: West Hylebos Educational Center Site Improvements Vicinity Map: w Headwaters Educational Facility and Restoration Site ,. fir*r;m' ,. , '`•.,'" . i r I Ml- m � a s aYa d., F AI o m. r-, 1 � =a 4 i fir. i c, a EELIr rvr %i`iC; Legend King Federal Way Stormwater CIP Update county West Hylebos Educational Center Faistingttewref ;gg i Site Improvements kormwalw pipe 4 54 100 200 Plena County H E R R E R A King County,Aerlel 12017) Monday,July 15, 2019 West Hylebos Educational Center Site Page 50 of 78 8:47:33 AM Improvements CIP Number: 37 2020-2027 SWM CIP—GRANT DEPENDENT PROJECT May 2019 North Fork West Hylebos Trail Project Location: North Fork West Hylebos Watershed Project Category: Education and outreach Land Acquisition: Land acquisition is required and will be accomplished through a separate project Project Benefits ,�, • Stormwater education and outreach ..S'"SM.bQ '-Ri�ny •w. H 1l;"h 1� .d', 1 ,..• Preservation/restoration of valuable habitat �� <,,��..�i��• � . • Creation of a new wildlife and outdoor r activity destination for City residents Project Facts f a' • The project would create approximated 1.1 , miles of nature trail in vibrant wetland settings k " a 't • Three possible trailhead locations would provide nearly unrestricted access to the V`4i trail system "�: Ru gym; '. � � • The trail system is an opportunity to display M the City's restoration and conservation efforts in the West Hylebos Watershed North Fork W Hylebos Trail This project will create a nature trail system within the Spring Valley along North Fork West Hylebos Creek. One leg of the trail system will be extended to the nearby Todd Beamer High School.The trail will better y connect the community with the natural environment, provide numerous education and outreach opportunities and encourage + environmental stewardship. This project would be a joint ventureNot : �� n between SWM and the Parks Department. The scope and timing of the 4r ;rf �4 �11" project will be highly dependent upon grant funding success. I _ Description Cost Property Acquisition $ Design $ 147,144 Construction $ 3,678,600 Grant Funding $ (1,912,872) Total $ 1,912,872 Page 1 2020-2027 SWM CIP—GRANT DEPENDENT PROJECT May 2019 4" sw to ; ' Legend LN, Proposed hlFork TrailheadLocation L �4 as s � i •.'�`, t ,..�,.. ,,- �,-_� i 3f Proposed NFork Trail '�/ / I�Existing Trails S1 Fsit ST a #1�1�iL f`:i_ . aF��4 x. I 1' t�1+ I�J Parcels Property&EasmentAquisitions Streams&Open Conveyance r f Lakes Wetlands(1998 City Survey) 1 Tr I BILIz� Impervious Surfaces Iia Date A. ri120n2 ,,� ;•,7 /i � r p p 'liclnityl.lap City of Federal4Vay 33325 8th Ave S Federal Wa/1":A 98003 FE DER AL i.P))253}835-7000 W A Y I 5T g a Fi y j py (1)www.cityoifederalway com is 3 ,1$ I1 1 CITY or Federal Way �i Li Cunt+r.-r.1,.t; Op(rvrluruty, North Fork West Branch Hylebos Trail Line Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Construction Cost 1 Boardwalk Trail 7035 LF S 600 $ 4,221,000 2 Engineering/Survey/Planning (4%) 1 EA $ 168,840 $ 168,840 4,389,840 Page 2 2020-2027 SWM CIP-GRANT DEPENDENT PROJECT May 2019 West Branch Hylebos Trail Project Location: Lower West Branch Hylebos Watershed Project Category: Education and Outreach ; Land Acquisition: Land acquisition is = 1 B ' required and will be accomplished through a r, q p 9 r � separate project Protect Benefits -4 • Stormwater education and outreach -. t "'` ' � e � - • Preservation/restoration of valuable habitat ,.; • Creation of a new wildlife and outdoor activity destination for City residents Protect Facts • The project would create approximately 1.7 miles of nature trail in vibrant wetland settings ;�� , ,s� `�:,,, • Two possible trailhead locations would provide nearly unrestricted access to the trail system �. R " • The trail system is an opportunity to display NO- the City's restoration and conservation efforts in the West Hylebos Watershed West Hylebos Watershed Trail This project will create a nature trail system within the Lower West M Branch Hylebos conservation areas to expand on the existing West ' Hylebos Wetland Park trails. The trails will better connect the community with the natural environment, provide numerous education and outreach opportunities and encourage environmental stewardship. Similar to the Headwaters Educational Facility,this project would be a ' �r joint venture between SWM and the Parks Department. The scope and timing of the project will be highly dependent upon grant funding success. _ Description Cost Property Acquisition — - $ - Design $ 220,080 Construction $ 5,502,000 Grant Funding $ (2,861,040) Total $ 2,861,040 Page 1 2020-2027 SWM CIP—GRANT DEPENDENT PROJECT May 2019 oF1 � sw.& I- F m 'tom 18 59 34 a 61 Legend � -_{ `�t6•� �-. — f- -- z=-- Pro posed'rV Branch HylebosTrailhead Proposed 114 Branch HylebosTrail y t s I � 7l �- s r I i I ` n. � r �`�� j •••_ �w � � Existing Trails 7 Parcels jj 7- Property R EasmentA uisiGon s treamsR Open Conveyance i --Hj�E Lakes (1�,I—�L I d `,�r.l .r 1 _ 7L �3Wetlands(1598City Survey) v 1 y Impervious Surfaces i. f Map Date:.April 2012 Vicinit:hlap r. City of Federal Way 3325 BWay, S FEDERAL f fth A 0S Federal4P?(253}•835-7000 W A Y ('.11}www.atyoffederalwat.com El CITY or tIj I� �.� __ �4..• ,,.. !'' Federal V1ly r li. Lll f;k:f{<41 WJl a .vs�(.. t. West Branch Hylebos Trail Line Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Construction Cost 1 Boardwalk Trail 9030 LF $ 600 $ 5,418,000 2 Engineering//Survey/Planning1 EA - $ 216,720 .. $ 216,720 Page 2 City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: Hidden Pond on Kim's Property Location: East of Pac Highway and North of S 373rd St. Basin: West Hylebos Number: 15 Date: Priority Score: 11 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $80,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: This pond manages stormwater runoff from Pacific Highway S and discharges to the West Hylebos.The pond was initially constructed by a private land owner and little is known about the design and the current stormwater treatment function of the pond. A 2015 report from HDR identified low dissolved oxygen levels in the pond and determined that these oxygen levels likely prohibit fish species from inhabiting the pond under its current conditions. The City is interested in using the site for advanced wetland mitigation. Project Solution: Develop a wetland mitigation project that can be used by Sound Transit as advanced mitigation for wetland impacts by their projects that complies with the Interagency Regulatory Guide—Advance Permittee-Responsible Mitigation (Ecology Publication # 12-06-015). Herrera assessed the feasibility of using this site for mitigation using drone and ground truthing techniques. The results of the feasibility assessment indicate a significant degree of uncertainty regarding potential value as an advanced mitigation site for wetland impacts due to the somewhat high level of ecological functions being performed in the wetland's current condition, and due to the limited opportunities for wetland creation at the site. It is unlikely that Sound Transit would invest in using the site for advanced wetland mitigation due to this uncertainty. If advanced mitigation is pursued, the project would require delineation of the existing wetland and a baseline assessment of the water quality, hydrologic, and habitat functions provided by the pond and surrounding vegetated areas.This work would be documented in a Critical Areas Report that would be valid for 5 years following its completion. Next, an advance mitigation plan would need to be developed which will include a proposed wetland mitigation design to achieve the maximum environmental lift from the system. For use as advance mitigation, the construction of the mitigation site would be required a minimum of 2 years prior Sound Transit impacts. Mitigation work must be proposed and permitted by Sound Transit if proposed for Sound Transit impacts. Cost Estimate Assumptions: Hidden Pond on Kim's Property Page 17 of 78 CIP Number: 15 The cost estimate is based on delineating the wetland and developing a Critical Areas Report ($30,000) and developing a design for wetland restoration to be documented in an Advance Mitigation Plan ($50,000). The cost of permitting and construction is not included in this estimate. Monday,July 15,2019 Hidden Pond on Kim's Property Page 18 of 78 8:47:26 AM CIP Number: 15 Project Scope Definition: Hidden Pond on Kim's Property Vicinity Map: � � u 14 i » M General area of potential � , ;� ,►� advanced mitigation site 4 N. v �"", ' . . r , ,yy trR ., e OR In Legendn8 Federal Way Stormwater CIP Update Hidden Pond on Kim's Property Appr=imateProjer:teztent Ebatingfeatures stormwow pipe �'a 0 100 200 400 9tneams and culyorts ',` `¢e FAA! Ptei6e1`\ r,yl County .w ��' HERRERA King County,Aerial 42017) Monday,July 15, 2019 Hidden Pond on Kim's Property Page 19 of 78 8:47:27 AM CIP Number: 15 City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: 33rd PI S Drainage Improvements Location: 33rd PI. South & S. 336th Basin: East Hylebos Number: 9 Date: Priority Score: 16 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $340,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: This area experiences chronic minor flooding that affects private lawns.The grade in the areas is very flat and infiltration galleries were installed about 10 years ago, but have not resolved flooding issues, which indicates infiltration may not be a feasible solution.There is no access to the nearby lake for a new outfall. Project Solution: The City should monitor flooding in the area to determine whether the cost of extending the stormwater pipe is merited. If monitoring indicates that this is the case, the City will extend the stormwater pipe westward to improve drainage conditions. Cost Estimate Assumptions: Cost estimate is based on extending the existing drainage system to the east. The itemized cost includes 900 LF of storm drain pipe, 6 drainage structures, protection of existing utilities, City project management, survey, geotech study, design, permitting, and construction management. 33rd PI 5 Drainage Improvements Page 12 of 78 CIP Number: 9 Project Scope Definition: 33rd PI S Drainage Improvements Vicinity Map: Connect Ta Existing Infiltration Facility Install 900 LF Ot - - ]2"Storm Drain Pdpe b 0 , 4V Restore Surface To w Pre-Project Conditions il�lgl Connect To Existing; Install Storm Drain Structure(TYP} �. 71 s rp' T - i Kirr',Cattn, Legend King Federal Way 5tormwater CIP Update county 33rd PI S Drainage Improvements Eaesting irrrures 99 Stormwater pipe Proposed features Storm d*a1n p.pr 0 75 150 300 Feet Proposed cuN.nrt y se Werce '"+r Storm drain structure County ` H E R R E R A King County Aerial 12017) Monday,July 15, 2019 33rd PI S Drainage Improvements Page 13 of 78 8:47.26 AM CIP Number: 9 Project Scope Definition: 33rd PI S Drainage Improvements Cost Estimate: City of Federal Way, Public Works: Capital Project Project Scope Definition 33rd Place S Drainage Improvements Authorized Funding SWM CIP $ 344,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $ Estimated Construction Cost $ 194,275 Design Cost Site Survey $ 15,000 Structural Engineering Review $ - Special Studies:Geotech 1 Asbestos J Haz Mat I Utilities&Structur( $ 18,000 Project Design $ 39,000 S 72,000.00 Right of Way Costs ROW Appraisals $ - ROW Acquisition $ - Other Costs and Commitments Direct Purchase of Material $ Direct Purchase ofEqu: ment S Other Construction Cost Construction Management 8% $ 16,000 Construction Administration 10% $ 19,000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 192000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 19,000 S 73,000 TOTAL COSTS DEDUCTED FROM PROJECT FUNDS: $ - Calculated Construction Cost $ 340,000 Total Project Cost S 340,000 Monday,July 1S, 2019 33rd PI S Drainage Improvements Page 14 of 78 8:47:26 AM CIP Number: 9 Engineering Construction Cost Estimate for Conceptual Design Project Name: 33rd Place S Drainage Improvements Project Number: 18-06849-000 Client: City of Federal Way Storrnwater Comprehensive Plan Update NJO QA Review HERRERA Completed/Updated By: Ondrej Sklenar Last Updated On: 4/26/2019 PeviPwrtd By: Matt Fontaine Reviewed On: 4/18/2019 Appriived By: DRAFT Ap-,ruv,-,d On: DRAFT Spec Sect./ Spec Item No. Std.Item No. Division Item Description Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Div 1 General Re uirements 1 IMobilization 1 L.S. 8% S 5,360,3-',, 2 Erosion/Water Pollution Control 1 L.S. I% $ 370.00 3 Utility Protection and Relocation 1 L.S. 2% S 1,340.00 4 Surface Restoration I L.S. $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 Div 7 Drainage Structures,Storm Sewers,Sanitary Sewers,Water Mains,and Conduits 5 Drainage Structure(Catch 3 3sln rr Manhole) 5 Each $ 2,500.00 $ 12 G 6 Connect to Drainage Structure 1 Each $ 500.00 $ 500,00 7 Storm Drain Pipe,Bedding and Backfill 900 L.F. $ 60.00 J $ 54,000.00 Construction Subtotal $ 119.370 Continaencv 50% $ 59.685 Subtotal(with Contingency) $ 179,055 Tax 8.5% $ 15,220 Construction Total(with Contingency and Tax) $ 194.275 Survev L.S. $15.000 Geotechnical Evaluation(infiltration potential) L.S. $15,000 Design 20% $39.000 Permitting L.S. $3.000 Citv Administration 10% $ 19,000 Construction Manaoement 8% $ 16.000 Construction Inspection 101x./ $ 19,000 Construction Continaencv 10% $ 19.000 Estimated Project Total(rounded to nearest 1.000thJ $ 340,000 Cost Estimate Template:Herrera APWA Printed On:7/12/2019 Page 1 of 1 CAUsers\mmullen\Herrera Environmental Consultants\Fedval Way Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan,Capital Improvements Program Update and Rate Study-Task_5_CIP\FedWay_CIP_Cost Estimates xlsm City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Location: Basin: West Hylebos Number: 28 Date: Priority Score: 11 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $350,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: Street flooding has occurred along Highway 99 just north of S 324th Street. The cause of the problem is not known. Though no flooding has been seen in this area in the last two years, flooding during an intense storm is expected. No obstructions were found in the pipe during a recent inspection. Project Solution: This project will include three phases: a drainage study with modeling and alternatives assessment, design, and construction. Two options will be considered during the modeling phase: Increase capacity in the system or provide upstream retention. Modeling is required to identify the location of capacity constraints. Cost Estimate Assumptions: The cost estimate includes the cost of the study, design, and a construction allowance based on consultant experience with similar projects. Monday, July 15, 2019 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Page 29 of 78 8:47:28 AM CIP Number: 28 Project Scope Definition: 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Vicinity Map: A Numerous priwate properties l I� tare tribornry to the smrrrt iimpr ..�i sv-Mem In "rv5 location, uhlc:h will , I add cotnpiexity to storrnwater 1 ie modell nlo a n fA tWI-1 —1111 fill x, w , xw a '�', R ' rlrr:a of Flooding Problems. I'raposed `;Gll11 on Dependent an hladelin[; Re-5,Lks And Alti'rn�ltl':?'A �IT,I�'r'S� r � a.. µ,. Le�enc N n4 Federal VVa} Stormwater CIP Update . � - ,, 324tr: and 99 Dr:in�ige IrTTQrOVC•!T1ltrltfi b ;!Indra:.!•. _.._. Smrmwar• FII:;,' "Y '�R 7rr1 1 — pp l.C:•JA 11'}' i..�'�T e ��'i l�Imo.�R{. N :pllr:!!, .9lirl:71I21C''i �r Monday,July 15, 2019 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Page 30 of 78 8.17.29 AM CIP Number: 28 Project Scope Definition: 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Cost Estimate: City of Federal Way, Public Works: Capital Project Project Scope Definition 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Authorized Funding SWM CIP $ 350,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $ - Estimated Construction Cost $200,000 Design Cost Site Survey $ 20,000 Structural Engineering Review $ - Special Studies-Geotech f Asbestos/Haz Mat!Utilities&Structures $ 35,000 Project Design $ 20,000 S 75,000.00 Right of Way Costs ROW Appraisals $ ROW Acquisition Other Costs and Commitments Direct Purchase of Material $ Direct Purchase of Equipment $ Other Construction Cost Construction Management 8% $ 16,000 Construction Administration 10% $ 20,000 Construction Inspection 10% S 20,000 Construction Contingency 10% S 20,000 S 76,000 T!.,TA `--{'QTS DEDI-I(-T ED S - Calculated Construction Cost $ 350,000 Total Project Cost $ 350,000 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Page 31 of 78 CIP Number: 28 Engineering Construction Cost Estimate for Conceptual Design Project Name: 324th and 99 Drainage Improvements Project Number: 18-06849-000 Client: City of Federal Way Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Update QA Review HERRERA cr,nip;i-ted/Updated By. Ondrej Sklenar Letist Updated On: 4/5/2019 Reviewed By. Matt Fontaine Re ne,.ved On: 4/18/2019 Anpi o,jud By: Matt Fontaine Approved On: 4/30/2019 Spec Sect.I Spec Item No. Std.Item No. Division Item Descriptio Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Construction Total(with Contingency and Tax) $ 200,000 Survev for Modeling1 L.S. $10,000 $10,000 Stormwater Modeling 1 L.S. $20.000 120.000 Alternatives Assessment 1 L.S. $10,000 $10,000 Survey for Desian 1 L.S. $10.000 $10,000 Design 1 L.S. $20.000 $20.000 Permitting 1 LS 1 $5,000 $5.000 Citv Administration 10% 5 20,000 Construction Management 8% 16.707 Construction Inspect on 10% 5 2C+000 Construction Continoencv 10% $ Z0,0'00 Estimated Project Total(rounded to nearest 1,OOOth) 5 350.000 Cost Estimate Template:Herrera APWA Printed On:7/12/2019 Page 1 of 1 CAUsersMmullenlHemera Environmental Consultants\Federal Way Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan,Capital Improvements Program Update and Rate Study-Task_5_CIPtFedWay_CIP_Cosl Estimates.bsm City of Federal Way Public Works: Capital Projects Project Scope Definition Project: Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Dr. West of 9th Ave SW Location: SW Campus Dr. West of 9th Ave SW Basin: West Hylebos Number: 32 Date: Priority Score: 11 Program Funding Components: SWM CIP (304, Project 284) $30,000 ENR CCI 11,061.85(December 2018) TOTAL FUNDS ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT: $0 Responsible Program Manager: Program Manager Responsible Project Manager/ Project Engineer: Project Manager Problem Description: Two storm drain laterals on SW Campus Dr. West are undersized and cause flooding in the roadway. Due to the recent HMA overlay on SW Campus Dr. West, the City would prefer to limit impacts to the road surface. Project Solution: Pipe bursting techniques should be used to replace the existing 8 inch diameter laterals with 12 inch stormwater pipes to increase capacity in the system. Cost Estimate Assumptions: The cost estimate for this project is based on the cost for replacing two pipes using pipe bursting techniques. Monday,Juiy i5, 2019 Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Dr.West of 9th Ave SW Page 39 of 78 8:47:30 AM CIP Number: 32 Project Scope Definition: Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Dr. West of 9th Ave SW Vicinity Map: Upsize Existing&Inch "' r Diameter Storm Drain Pipe to 12-inch Dlameter h s 4Q w , w A a Upsize Existing 8-Inch _ Diameter Storm Drain Pipe to 12-Inch Diameter I No Open-Cut Of 4W . SW Campus Drive Allowed, Utilize Pipe Bursting Technology + for Pipe Upsizing it x a , oft ter" Legend King Federal Way Stormwater CIP Update EawlnSfellture! __, county Upsize Pipes at SE Campus Dr. �I "' West of 9th Ave SW __....___ 5[nrmwster pilus ..! Streams and culve"s `� 5 0 59 190 296 Proposed features , Storm drain pspe Feet Come HERRERA Proposed culvert County p King County.Aerial 12017) Monday,July 15, 2019 Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Dr.West of 9th Ave SW Page 40 of 78 8:47:31 AM CIP Number: 32 Project Scope Definition: Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Dr. West of 9th Ave SW Cost Estimate: City of Federal Way, Public Works: Capital Project Project Scope Definition Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Drive West of 9th Ave SW Authorized Funding SWM CIP TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $ Estimated Construction Cost $ 22,026 Design Cost Site Survey $ - Structural Engineering Review $ Special Studies-Geotech!Asbestos!Haz Mat/Utilities&Structures $ Prolecf Des1gn e 5 Right of Way Costs ROW Appraisals $ ROW Acquisition $ Other Costs and Commitments Direct Purchase of Material $ Direct Purchase of Equipment $ Other Construction Cost Construction Management 8% $ 2,000 Construction Administration 10% $ 2,000 Construction Inspection 10% $ 2,000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 2,000 $ 8,000 TOTAL COSTS DEDUCTED FROM PROJECT FUNDS- $ - Calculated Construction Cost $ 30,000 Total Project Cost $ 30,000 Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Dr.West of 9th Ave SW Page 41 of 78 CIP Number: 32 Engineering Construction Cost Estimate for Conceptual Design Project Name: Upsize Pipes at SW Campus Drive West of 9th Ave SW Project Number: 18-06849-000 Client City of Federal Way Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Update QA Review R R P A Conipletec Lipcated By. Ondrej Sklenar I;ast Updated On: 4/26/2019 Reviewed By: Matt Fontaine R,evlewee On: 4/30/2019 Approver By: Matt Fontaine Approved On: 4/30/2019 Spec Sect./ Spec Item No. Std.Item No. Division Item Description Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Pipe Bursting 60 L.F. $150 $9,000 Sidewalk Restoration 70 S.F $50 $3.500 (Remove and Reinstall Drainaae Structures 1 $2.000 $2.000 Construction Subtotal $ 14,500 Desi n Continaencv 40% $ 580000 Subtotal(with Contingent ) $ 20,300 lTax 8.5% $ 1,726 Construction Total(with Contingency and Tax) $ 22,026 1CitvAdministration I10%� $ 2.000 Construction Management 8% $ 2,000 Construction inspection 10% $ 2.000 Construction Contingency 10% $ 2.000 IEstimated Project Total(rounded to nearest 1.000th) $ 30.000 Cost Estimate Template:Herrera APWA Printed On:7/12/2019 Page 1 of 1 C:\Usen\mmullen\Herrera Environmental ConwItantsTederal Way Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan,Capital Improvements Program Update and Rale Study-TasIt_5_CIRFedWay_CIP_Coal EsUmates dsm COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#• —Eig— CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: WILD WAVES HOLDINGS LEASE AGREEMENT POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council approve a lease agreement with Wild Waves Holdings and authorize execution of the agreement? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: September 9, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY:'))esiree Winkler,P.E. Deputy Public Works Director DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: 1. Approve the proposed lease agreement with Wild Waves Holdings for an initial period of ten (10) years and authorize execution of the agreement. 2. Reject the lease agreement and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMEND TION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: j S 4 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: `1 Co C C I itial/Date Initial/Date Initial Da c COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option I to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. Mark oK an ,Committee Chair JOske Johnson,Committee Member Hoang Tran, _ommittee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): "I move to approve a lease agreement with Wild Waves Holdings and authorize execution of the agreement." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: City Council VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: EJ Walsh,P.E.,Director of Public Works Desiree Winkler,P.E.,Deputy Public Works Director SUBJECT: Wild Waves Holdings Lease Agreement FINANCIAL IMPACTS: In consideration of the lease agreement,Wild Waves Holdings is agreeing to pay the City$4,235.66 and a 12.84%leasehold tax in year 1 of the lease. Each subsequent year the lease payment will be adjusted by the MSRC June CPI-U for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue Region. BACKGROUND: Wild Waves Holdings and the previous owners of Wild Waves Theme Park have had an agreement with the City to lease a portion of the Right of Way along Milton Road for many years.The previous agreement has expired and a new agreement is required to be executed to allow the continued lease of the Right of Way. The Right of Way is not currently being used for Milton Road,however is required for construction of the ultimate cross section.Until such time that Milton Road is expanded,the City does not require the use of this property. As part of the agreement,Wild Waves Holdings has agreed to make an annual lease payment and be responsible for maintaining the associated area. Additionally,the lease contains terms that if the City elects to construct, or causes construction,of improvements to Milton Road Wild Waves Holdings will need to remove their improvements and allow for said construction. The proposed lease is for a period of ten(10)years. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 5h_ ............... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:FEDERAL WAY LINK EXTENSION TASK ORDER#2 POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute Task Order#2 for the Federal Way Link Extension Project between the City and Sound Transit for City services and costs related to project review and permitting, and authorize a total of up to four term limited temporary positions funded by the Task Order? COMMITTEE: Land Use,and Transportation MEETING DATE: September 9, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY:, To Doucette, P.E., City Liaison to Sound Transit4b DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Federal Way Link Extension Task Order#2 Options Considered: 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute Task Order#2. 2. Do not authorize the Mayor to execute the Task Order,and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMEND TION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: `j DIRECTOR APPROVAL: cI �j1�cl AF Cos nuuL -CnLutei Initial/Date Initial/Date IniUn1 Datc COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Federal Way Link Extension Task Order #2 to the September]7, 2019 consent agenda for approval. 01 �^e In- Mark Koppang. Committee Chair Jess Johnson,Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of Federal Way Link Extension Task Order #2, effective September 1, 2019 through December 31, 2024, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreement. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# I CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2019 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: EJ Walsh, P.E., Public Works Director Tony Doucette,P.E.,City Liaison to Sound Transit'I� SUBJECT: Federal Way Link Extension Task Order#2 Financial Impacts: The revenue to the City for Federal Way Link Extension Task Order #2 will be $4,940,000 and will be credited to the Public Works and Community Development Departments. The cost to the City to receive the funds is anticipated to be equal to the revenue over the life of the Task Order. Upon completion of the Task Order#2,there will be no future revenue or costs. Background Information: The City of Federal Way and Sound Transit have been working cooperatively for several years to plan and preliminarily design the Federal Way Link Extension Project(FWLE). The City and Sound Transit approved a Development Agreement in 2019 that identified the project location, project elements,station layout, surplus property development goals, development standards, and the design, permitting and inspection process. This Task Order#2 and staffing authorization will provide the funding to achieve the goals and objectives identified in the Development Agreement. The City and Sound Transit entered into the City Services Agreement in July of 2017 to reimburse City staff for time on the project. To-date, staff have worked under Task Order#1 for planning, procurement and preliminary design services. In June of 2019, Sound Transit selected Kiewit,Inc. as the design- builder to deliver the FWLE Project. Task Order#2 under the City Services Agreement will allow the City to be reimbursed for staff time and permitting fees for the following project phases: 1. Early Design Review 2. Design Review an Construction 3. Systems/Rail Activation/Project closeout Sound Transit will pay the City in nineteen(19)quarterly installments with amounts outlined in Attachment 3 of Task Order#2 for a total amount of$4.W0.000 For staff time and permit fees related to the FWLE Project. Payments will be made on a quarterly basis %\ith payments beginning for the 3 Quarter of 2019 and the last payment due in the second quarter of 2024. The final payment shall be due with the completion of construction inspection activities, resolution of punch list items, and certificates of occupancy issues. No additional Task Orders are expected for the project. To provide the design review, permitting and inspection services,the task order will fund up to four(4.0)term-limited temporary positions between the Public Works and Community Development Departments or allow City staff to utilize consultant resources. This staffing authorization will extend only for the duration Sound Transit funding. Rev.6/2019 Final Draft 8/29/19 CITY SERVICES AGREEMENT(GA XXXX-17) BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND SOUND TRANSIT FOR CITY SERVICES AND COSTS RELATED TO FEDERAL WAY LINK EXTENSION PROJECT REVIEW AND PERMITTING Task Order 2: Design Review and Construction Services Support(through project close-out) This Task Order is issued under the City Services Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Sound Transit for City Services and Fees related to Federal Way Link Extension (FWLE) Project Review and Permitting dated July 17, 2017. This Task Order establishes the scope, schedule, and budget including staffing and permitting fees, through Project construction and close-out, scheduled to occur in 2024. In the event the project schedule extends beyond 2024, the City and Sound Transit will evaluate the need for additional funding. The City agrees to perform the Services in the manner set forth in this Task Order. The terms and conditions of the City Services Agreement are incorporated into this Task Order unless expressly modified below. This Task Order shall be effective as of the date signed by Sound Transit. Project Description. This Task Order covers city work and fees during the Early Design Review, Design Review and Construction, and Systems/ Rail Activation/ Project Closeout Phases. City involvement will include a City Project Liaison (as variously described in Design-Build Contractor documents and in the City's Development Agreement with Sound Transit) and other staff whose role it will be to expedite processes related to Design-Build Project delivery, including design review, permitting, and inspection. • Attachment 1:Task Order Scope of Work(Pre-Construction and Construction Services Support) • Attachment 2: Project Preliminary Permitting Plan • Attachment 3: Achievement Milestones and Payment Plan The authorized representatives of the parties have agreed to the terms of this Task Order by signing below. For the City For Sound Transit Signature Signature Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: City Attorney Sound Transit Legal Counsel Task Order 2 Page 1 GA XXXX-18 Task Order 2 -Attachment 1 Pre-Construction and Construction Services Support: Scope of Work Overview. The scope of this Task Order 2 identifies City tasks associated with preparations for issuance of the Design-Build Contractor Notice-to-Proceed (NTP), final design, permitting, heavy construction and Project close-out, scheduled to occur in 2024, as well as all permitting and approvals. This Task Order is defined to cover the range of tasks below from September 2019 through March 31, 2024 in order to provide certainty and predictability to both the City and Sound Transit by clarifying workload and cash flow payments, expeditiously conducting Project reviews and permitting, and ensuring Project delivery and closeout within the lifetime budget Total Compensation for City Services. Sound Transit will pay the City a fixed fee in the amount of four million nine hundred forty thousand dollars ($4.94 million) for City costs associated with the scope of this Task Order 2. Payments will be made on a quarterly basis as noted in Attachment 3. This payment shall be inclusive of: • Permitting: All permit fees and approvals and related costs. The City agrees that it will not separately charge Sound Transit additional permit or approval-related fees. The scope of this Task Order 2 includes anticipated City activities necessary to facilitate all permits and approvals required for completion of the FWLE Project as identified during the procurement process. As part of the Development Agreement between the City and Sound Transit, the Parties prepared a Preliminary Permitting Plan that identified anticipated permits and is included as Attachment 2 to this Task Order. The Plan includes timelines and milestones for City review and approval of Project permit submittals. Sound Transit's Design-Build Contractor will further refine and finalize the Preliminary Permitting Plan to create a Final Permitting Plan that will be reviewed and approved by the City as detailed in the Development Agreement.The Final Permitting Plan will provide a framework that supports approval of construction permits within mutually agreed upon timeframes that support the overall Project schedule. • Staffing: All staffing and staff related costs necessary to support the overall project schedule and as detailed in this Task Order. Staffing is required to support the following four phases: Phase 1: Early Design Review: This phase covers staffing services for review of early submittals beginning in September 2019 and continuing through to December 2019. Phase 2: Design Review and Construction: This phase covers staffing services through the entirety of the final design and construction phase, which is estimated to begin in January 2020 and to conclude in September 2023. This phase also includes design review, permitting, inspections, and testing. Phase 3: Systems/ Rail Activation / Protect Closeout: This phase covers staffing services from the conclusion of heavy construction until the following three conditions are met: 1) construction inspection activities end, 2) punch list items are accepted via a letter from the City, and 3) building inspection services end and the last Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Costs of permitting and staffing will be paid to the City and are reflected in the respective payment estimates below. Invoicing and Payment. Payments will be made to the City tinder this Task Order 2 as follows: • Staffing and Permitting Costs: Sound Transit shall pay the City a total of four million nine hundred forty thousand dollars ($4.94 million) to cover all staffing and permit related costs.This shall be paid to the City in nineteen (19) payments detailed in Attachment 3. Eighteen (18) payments will be paid within 30 days of submission for work completed in the previous quarter, Task Order 2 Attachment 1 GA XXXX-18 Page 1 starting in Quarter 4 of 2019 and ending in Quarter 2 of 2024. The final payment (191h of 19 payments) will be made payable upon achievement of the following: 1) construction inspection activities end, 2) punch list items are accepted via a letter from the City, and 3) building inspection services end and the last Certificate of Occupancy is issued. If completion of these items occurs later than Quarter 2 of 2024, payment will be made 30 days after completion of the items.The payment plan is captured in Attachment 3. • City invcicin�:The City shall submit to Sound Transit quarterly progress reports and an invoice for the quarterly payment as described above. Progress reports must describe services provided by the City during the payment period, including progress made and work completed toward agreed upon activities and milestones identified in Attachment 3. Scope of Work. A. Project Management and Administration. A.I. Management and Administration. The key purpose of this task is to provide accurate and timely project administration and production of quality work products to allow for Sound Transit's design and construction of the Project. This task will be continuous throughout the duration of this Task Order and through Project closeout scheduled for 2024 and includes the work necessary to set up and participate in meetings, design reviews, construction progress meetings, quarterly invoicing, monitoring and reporting progress, and providing overall Project coordination. The Parties anticipate that work plans will be developed as the Project proceeds to provide greater specificity on tasks and durations of activities, which will allow for the flexibility needed to respond to the Design-Build construction process. These work plans may be produced for milestone phases, on an annual or other basis as mutually agreed by the Parties. Deliverables • Provide quarterly invoicing and progress reporting and ongoing project management activities. • Develop and/or refine, in collaboration with Sound Transit, annual or milestone City work plans detailing City support to be provided to the Project. A.Z. City Project Liaison. The key purpose of the City Project Liaison is to participate in and facilitate the intensive coordination with Sound Transit required to deliver the FWLE Project. The City Project Liaison will be co-located at least 50%of the time at the project office. This Task Order presumes that the City Project Liaison position will be funded by Sound Transit at 100%of an FTE. Given the mutual interests of both Sound Transit and the City in ensuring the City Project Liaison is qualified and effective in discharging their duties,the City shall consult with Sound Transit on the best-qualified candidate should this position need to be refilled. Deliverables • Colocation of City Project Liaison • Provide job description for the City Project Liaison • Select the best-qualified candidate for the position. A.3. Coordination and Communication. The key purpose of coordination and communication during all phases is to participate with Sound Transit to effectively deliver the Project. Activities include Task Order 2 Attachment 1 GA XXXX-18 Page 2 participating in project coordination meetings and preparing for and/or following up on key topics to advance resolution of issues that may arise during delivery of the Project. Deliverables • Attend Sound Transit project coordination meetings. B. Phase 1: Early Design Review. B.1, Over-the-Shoulder Design Review. The key purpose of this task is for the City's Project Liaison to participate in the design review process, working closely with Sound Transit and Sound Transit's Design- Build Contractor to ensure timely review of Design-Build Contractor designs and materials and resolution of identified issues. The City Project Liaison will be at least part-time co-located at the Project office during this phase and through Project heavy construction, and their primary function will be to identify and resolve issues to support the design process and development of plans that satisfy the City's permitting requirements. Sound Transit will provide a co-located working space for the City Liaison at no cost to the City. Deliverables • Co-location of City Project Liaison at Sound Transit's construction project office,with the amount of time spent to be determined based on Project workload. • Attend construction progress and other meetings. • Participate in resolving issues resulting from review of Design-Build Contractor design submittals. B.2. Review of Design-Build Contractor Submittals. As part of this task,the City will participate in Sound Transit's review of Design-Build Contractor design submittals, pursuant to commitments made in the City's Development Agreement and as part of fulfilling commitments for expeditious Project permitting. Close coordination through regularly scheduled meetings referenced in Section A.1 of this Task Order and additional meetings as needed will be necessary to advance, review, and communicate issues with the City and to seek feedback or concurrence from the City. The City will be responsible for performing reviews of document submittals and returning unified and coordinated comments from all relevant City departments within a timeframe mutually agreed upon with Sound Transit staff. If for any reason the City requires additional review time, the City will notify Sound Transit as soon as possible. Deliverables • Provide consolidated and coordinated comments on Design-Build Contractor Design submittal packages, consistent with the Design-Build Contractor's final Project Permitting Plan. • Review and submission of consolidated comments on other Design-Build Contractor submittals, including but not limited to: o Transportation Management Plan. o Maintenance of Traffic Plan(s). o Construction Noise and Vibration Mitigation Plan. o Construction Outreach and Communication Plan. B.3. Review/Approve Design-Build Contractor Final Permitting Plan. The City will participate in the development, review, and approval of a Final Permitting Plan submitted by Sound Transit's Design-Build Contractor. The Plan will include City commitments for timely and expedited review of design and permit submittal packages. Task Order 2 Attachment 1 GA XXXX-18 Page 3 Deliverables • Submit consolidated and coordinated comments on Design-Build Contractor draft Project Permitting Plan. • Work in good faith to resolve comments on draft Project Permitting Plan. • Approve final Design-Build Contractor Project Permitting Plan. 8.4. Permitting Early Work. There will likely be activities during this phase requiring the issuance of City permits. The following activities are currently anticipated: 8.4.1. Permitting for Early Demolition. Sound Transit began the process of acquiring property needed for Project construction and operation in 2017. Some of the properties being acquired in the City have structures that will require demolition as part of Design-Build Contractor activities. The key purpose of this activity is to coordinate on the demolition permitting process. Deliverables • Support process to expedite permits required for demolition activities consistent with the final Project Permitting Plan. 8.4.2. Permitting for Early Foundation Construction. Under this task, City staff will work with Sound Transit and its Design-Build Contractor to review and permit early work in accordance with code regulations to allow for installing structural and other foundations in advance of heavy construction. Deliverables * Support process to expedite permits required for installation of structural and other foundations consistent with the final Project Permitting Plan. B.4.3. Permitting for Clearing and Grading. Under this task, City staff will work with Sound Transit and its Design-Build Contractor to review and permit early work clearing and grading the Project in advance of heavy construction. Deliverables • Support process to expedite permits required to begin clearing and grading work. B.S. Early Utility Relocation. City staff will work with Sound Transit and its Design-Build Contractor to review and approve plans for early work to relocate utilities in advance of Project heavy construction. Deliverables • Expedited review and approval of early utility relocation plans and submittals. 8.6. Stormwater Coordination. Under this task, City staff will work with Sound Transit and its Design- Build Contractor to refine design of stormwater infrastructure constructed as part of the Project to handle stormwater runoff generated by the Project. Deliverables • Expedited review and approval of infrastructure that will be constructed as part of the Project to manage stormwater runoff within City rights-of-way. C. Phase 2: Design Review and Construction. D.1. Permitting. Consistent with the Final Project Permitting Plan, developed during the early construction phase, the City will provide timely review and processing of Design-Build Contractor permit submittals to support the design/build construction approach and the overall construction schedule. Task Order 2 Attachment 1 GA XXXX-18 Page 4 Deliverables • Expedite permits as issued to Sound Transit's Design-Build Contractor for Project construction. C.2. Desipn Review of Change Orders. As part of this task, City staff will review design revisions associated with change orders, as requested by Sound Transit,that affect City rights-of-way or for which the City may have permitting authority. Deliverables • Provide design review of elements included in Project Change Orders, as requested by Sound Transit. • Submit consolidated and coordinated comments on design revisions associated with Project Change Orders to Sound Transit on a timeline mutually agreed to and based on the magnitude of the Change Order proposed. C.3. Pr-olect Inspection. The reimbursement of City staff time for Project inspection activities will focus on infrastructure constructed as part of the Project that will be under the City's eventual ownership and control, and activities with required inspections per the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) outlined in the Development Agreement to support the process of acceptance. The following categories have been identified for City inspection services and should be used by the City for the purposes of administration and progress reporting. C.3.1. Rifflit-of-way Inspection C.3.2. Civil/Utilities/Grade and rill Inspection C.3.3. Tree Replacement/ Landscaping Inspection C.3.4. Stormwater Inspection C.3.5. Building Inspection (Foundations,Walls, Structural, Code Compliance) C.3.6. Mechanical Inspection C.3.7. StrrtcUKal ln�pection C.3.8. Electrical Inspection C.3.9. Plumbing Inspection C.4. Utility Relocation. During this phase, City staff will be asked to participate in the utility relocation process for City-owned facilities located on City property or within public rights-of-way. The City will work with Sound Transit and its Design-Build Contractor to provide timely review of plans submitted and to perform required site inspection activities. Review, approval, and inspection, as needed, of utility relocation plans and submittals. C.5. Lire, U'le, and Safety Coordination. South King County Fire and Rescue (SKF&R) will be the lead agency reviewing fire, life, and safety design elements and City staff may be asked to coordinate with SKF&R during review of fire, life, and safety issues as they relate to Project design and construction. Deliverables • Coordinate with SKF&R as needed to consolidate input and comments on Project issues as they relate to fire, life, and safety. C.6. Maintenance of Traffic and Transportation. Under this task, City staff will be asked to review and approve maintenance of traffic (MOT) and other plans for temporary traffic controls proposed by Sound Transit's Design-Build Contractor. Deliverables Task Order 2 Attachment 1 GA XXXX-18 Page 5 • Attend MOT and other meetings to discuss maintenance of traffic and transportation. • Review and approve MOT submittals provided by Sound Transit's Design-Build Contractor. C.7. Right-of-Way(ROW). The purpose of coordination between the City and Sound Transit during this phase is to track and facilitate the process of required vacation of City rights-of-way and the dedication and recordation of property transfers that may be made between the Parties. Deliverables s Recordation of property transfers. D. Phase 3: Svstems/Rail Activation /Project Closeout. D.1. Electrical Inspection In this task, the City will work in close collaboration with Sound Transit construction staff to inspect electrical systems installed at Light Rail Transit(LRT) station areas, specifically, in station garages and in LRT stations. D.2. Fire, Life, and Safety Inspection. In this task, SKF&R will be the lead agency for fire, life, and safety inspections and the City will coordinate with SKF&R inspections of structures and other elements constructed as needed to ensure that fire, life, and safety measures are certified, as appropriate. D.3. Noise Monitoring/Testin-o. In this task,the City will participate with Sound Transit in the implementation and review of any noise monitoring and/or testing that may be required as part of constructing noise walls or other mitigations to minimize LRT-generated noise. D.4. ,Acce�ata ice,,of City Proiect Infrastructure. In this task,the City will work with Sound Transit construction staff to appropriately document the acceptance of City infrastructure constructed as part of the Project. D.5. Certificates of OCCLIpancy. The City will work with Sound Transit to ensure timely issuance of certificates of occupancy upon fulfillment of all code requirements for Project infrastructure, including LRT stations, park-and-rides, and other occupied structures. Deliverables • Punch list items are accepted via a letter from the City. • Building inspection service end and the last Certificate of Occupancy is issues as appropriate. • Acceptance of record as-built drawings. Task Order 2 Attachment 1 GA XXXX-18 Page 6 Design Packages Permitting Packages z - E E € a a a E o s — �a o 1 L C m A s g �� d 3 to e E N0 v C y C 0 N E2 ' E o E 3 'L$ c w4 5 .N'..�. a .. N'� .. n m n ry H ry m m m a E E Q dyy Q' E -2y 9 3 p — E - 3 tri Eca°�Za c_ E �aEc£ c C d you ed E i E ' Ea E �Na` LL� m o e, ` m' a` .5 3 m a E EE 3 n 113 ei _ S� ro a A _ d .SaE c'o� a3, 0 5� E E 6 ffiE E 0 0 ffi0 S. n a E � r@ u ^ E'm n •N E� E n' 3 '„ a '=�c All _ c m h n g a u r ra <c rd n v m` €.. a3° a �3 E3� .. `� E2. 9 i^ c u,� C A Elg° v -' .. `o S; �a fir is C— I'. E ztq� Y I-. a� a E c E °i r $ € c E s 6 y 9 E E! n L 9 JS .� M 4, 4J C � aJ f0 o E a O U O � Lr) 4"� ih Q y On On OA W c _ c c c O Q1 •t O M `� N ' 4J O N E O E O " ON aJ U Q Ln Q ON n O 0.. C C i : "c Lr C Q7 m fC f0 Co E O On C OD �• U C CC Q v Q ' v `` a co cc -- ro N M Lnv o Ln o � N c � c C) c o c o C) aJ raJ r-i O a1 N 0 aJ N 0 arn a Cf .i a C7 � a � vi O +� U > v t a' c m bZ > aJ C O O -° c > "O c i 41 L c N u > L Q m O v OD O `o -° V)i M O +� aJ p c 4, Ln O 7 E N �p •O L U CO .N 'a cu c HU ^ CU v a� 1� a..+ c � Q tin L a) 4--+ � C O E 'a u o c U ~ c U rLv 16 U v a E c4-1 ' c v _ m m °' ° ° en ° ° '- O E '° " w E u a 4* E c� N C , 0- N u u N E i m Q Q = Q1 •� c (A >, Q i (0 •� L O Q c C N N O > c p C o GJ > N O O L N E1 O v E c �O a a ,O .QC •+p •+., O •f6 +J aJ � O > LA O G V N 7 7 L Q J In d a U o .� >„ O Q ate+ Q 'N 4 O c ° " a > E a Q. ( > c c E `L° c O o c Q � a� c += o o v V F- v> n ii cv V a) ° n N U v v a LnGl > C 4-1 'a c ai > ° 0 3 r u oc co 3 } c + a� f° 0 a� a _ > a o 4� Lcu o E o `) c o v s Ln E y c a p E c O +� 4� c 0 co u,� tin -0L. tjo �' o v •E o ° ai E v ro to a ,c o 3 n3 v L 4 a a t � a) }' u >. u E 45 � a' c N +� o o `��° v o o c 4-> C) a > v C) ° L +J O o V) v +� � a o o n c V ' -a _ o f � v 3 ° > o +, V v 0 Q +� C) Q Q a v c 0 a`) N a) c QLn M > � >� o c X p > c E o cp �, u c c n3 li C> > COi i i C LM ° _0 +J d V ,, a1 3 ro U C In C v O E _ > a a) c u a) c ro oA a� a N — o � o o ro v E N o +, 'y Y CU OD V) a� v cc v, i a) O OJ Y Q O +' C) r v E a a +J oc a, v E c 0 c M � c 0 `° `° p c ,C OA E CL a a, E c E vc L a� m cc v v v c c u o cu E v c a) O M 0 � M tin cv co o f�6 a1 C +, 7 u aJ ,� N X W a s n ° a, a v v C _L C- .E v a c a a X v O 'u E 'v v N •iv—, � � � N U Q � � ° � � 'a X W •L iz "c a) Q L L E L a,) > •> •p O •L W L '5 •p c = L � L X N t0 On ° cv cv O co aJ N +� i p co N m aJ aJ p ro C X Q a m M M a v U a +- � ar a u a Q a -0 a a a u Ln a 4, X 2 2 V) Q M nJ � v � a v ro Q on tin on tin tw tiA bn w C C C C C N C C C rV0 4-+ � +� N N +y +� N O NO O O N N N N N E N E O E N �j a) (J O a) N aJ Lrj a a N a) O a1 Q Q N Q O Q �.1 Q Q Q N Q O C C CC Ql C C C C •C M m m r6 c9 -CM 7 M = M c6 O to 7 OA = on w O to dD L > C � d<J U C C C QQ C C M m m — m m O c0 c-I (O N cD ++ N O N O 41 � O A N O a-+ N O a.. Ln O + Ul) O +, Ln O C O O C O O C O C `i 0 C `1 O C S O C N O C N O a NO W N O a! N O a) N O a) N O w N O aJ N0 aJ N O E ON o E oN o E oN o E roll o E oN o E CN:) o E Crc E oN o >. Ln >. an >- Ln >- u> >. Ln >. Ln >. Ln >- O M � a � aC7v`"i a � n`° cfv} a � aUv acf co a c a� M rn E C m � a E v C m f0 Q � N O 0 -a — O 2 Y � M H t t U +� V U C V 4-1 a) f9 ++ O m a� a U cu a > 'o � U d � f9 ro O 4- V) U Q ei O C: Q. Q cu bo V) ai 3 E v 3 N X O X a +J V) x v o C�o 0 x cr '% a u U Y X N Q ro • r f- C7 Co M 4� a C CA f0 C E in- 0 O CL N U O N CDM CD CD M CCD � m O '+' O +_ + _ N ate_ (N ~ 4 > a C N E NE �M.J E M E N E NN E C E U L L L N L L L a L (o � a Lr a O a a a Lr a a E o r-I Q CL N Q. ON Q `� CL ri Q Q a O O C) a gyri - v -0 a ro ZZ n C C C �i C c co a c — a U O ro — m co O ro t ca co — a u CD CD Q t CD CD w 3 a O �¢ O •a ro L V, N N N L � E a a O +, O o +� O 4� o +, o � O > E 'u C N O C N O C M O C M O C M O C co O C S O fB a N 0 a N 0 a N C) a N 0 a N 0 a N 0 a N O a j i E ON o E O o E � o E No o E r o E � o E C o F > m M O c O m H O M N O m M O co � -i m H � jz C u C a cf a C7 a C7 a cf a d � rz C7 v� a C7 v} r"o uu c � Mc ro = N O m a..r U '5 U aj GlQ a f° O V) c/ Q M O N C U_ U a U U Q O 0 4- O 2 .04-1 U O Q Q C u QJ 4Z +J C- a Q 1 Q ai c a E - a L y +• QJ G1 O v V, O CD a ro N Q > > u 'a v O N a u 7 O a vO y C L = r0 d m G1 fo O E • • • 0 CA s O C v Q 3 0 o N O C n IA roo V) +� O c 'm m v E v u Ln v a L L1 r0 � O •C � O a-- O cr "a a z +' CD d y LJ C vi > C C ++ O C O ++ •� cn a Y Q U U u N N Q O :6 v a OD L 0 aU V a, a E x aa+ l6 y.r C U a 3 U U v a U O ro U U C O +•+ } O a Q u co C �- r 4-1 > }' ° °j v E L x N > 3 n c- 0 X O Q LU 4.01 ° N EEv a O 0 X a y u a w v U aL Y a � f° a m 4, c � v � E a L � Y 0 V u O aj m Q Q m m a M i � C QJ Q p U U - (O ^ m L m -0 Y LMC E fa LA R CU a - V) 4+ U U (A Q1 C Vf M a CL t7 E U 7 = 0 U CL y O s a s a� M C � � a � s ++ y Q c N 0 r.+ L y Gl Q1 y = CJ d t V Q N X L X � X O X -�c X V) a Task Order 2 Attachment 3 Achievement Milestones and Payment Plan CITY OF FEDERAL WAY INVOICE COVER TEMPLATE ISSUING COMPANY AND REMITTANCE ADDRESS INVOICE NUMBER Prime Firm Address Line 1 XXXXXXX Address Line 2 DATE Tel: (XXX)XXX-XXXX Fax:(XXX)XXX-XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Attn: Designated Representative PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER PRIME PROJECT NUMBER Sound Transit Union Station XXXX 401 South Jackson Street GA 0183-17 Seattle,WA 98104-2826 —._... ____.... _._..a._. .__....._._ - _. PERIOD COVERED From:XX/XX/XXXX To:XX-XX-XXXX PROJECT TITLE FWLE City of Kent Task Order 2 Total Invoice Amount$ GA 0183-17 PAYMENT REQUEST NUMBER Total To Date: $0.00 Total Previously Invoiced: $0.00 Amount This Invoice: $0.00 Amount Paid to Date: $0.00 Amount Outstanding: $0.00 Original Contract Amount: $0.00 Approved Change Orders: $0.00 Total Authorized Contract Amount: $0.00 Remaining Contract Amount: $0.00 I certify that the charges invoiced are true and correct and include only such charges as were directly incurred in the performance of work on the project, have not been previously submitted,and are in accordance with terms of the Agreement. [Project Manager Name] [Title] Task Order 2 Attachment 3 GA XXXX-XX Task Order 2 Attachment 3 Achievement Milestones and Payment Plan Payment Progress Detail Template (Please Submit with each invoice) Invoice#: Period covered: PHASE 1: Early Design Review Key City Activities Achievement Milestones • Participate in the development, review, and • City Liaison is co-located at Sound Transit's approval of a Final Permitting Plan including the construction project office development of an agreed to process for • Final Permitting Plan approved by Sound expedited permit review and approval Transit and City including the process to • Participate in the timely review of design expedite permit review submittals of early work and return consolidated • Final Contractor mitigation plans approved by and coordinated comments from all relevant Sound Transit and the City City departments • City issues permits needed to begin early • Participate in resolving issues resulting from construction activities, such as demolition and review of the design submittals clearing and grading, to support Project • Review and approve other Contractor required schedule plans • Review and approve plans for early work to relocate utilities • Provide accurate and timely project administration and coordination • Participate in project coordination meetings Please insert narrative summarizing activities and progress towards achievement milestones: Task Order 2 Attachment 3 GA XXXX-XX Task Order 2 Attachment 3 Achievement Milestones and Payment Plan Payment Progress Detail Template (Please Submit with each invoice) Invoice#: Period covered: PHASE 2: Design Review and Construction Key City Activities Achievement Milestones • Participate in permit-focused, over-the- • City issues permits needed for heavy shoulder, discipline-specific meetings described construction activities, including site in the D-B Permitting Plan construction, building, and trade permits,to • Provide timely review and processing of design support Project schedule and permit submittals in a way that supports the construction approach and the overall construction schedule • Participate in resolving issues resulting from review of the design submittals • Review change orders as requested that affect City rights-of-way • Provide timely inspection activities on infrastructure constructed as part of the Project that will be under the City's ownership Please insert narrative summarizing activities and progress towards achievement milestones: Task Order 2 Attachment 3 GA XXXX-XX Task Order 2 Attachment 3 Achievement Milestones and Payment Plan Payment Progress Detail Template (Please Submit with each invoice) Invoice#: Period covered: PHASE 3: Systems/Rail Activation/Project Closeout Key City Activities Achievement Milestones • Track and facilitate the process of required • Heavy construction and inspection activities vacation of City rights-of-way and dedication end and recordation of property • Punch list items are accepted via a letter from • Resolve any outstanding issues as they arise the City • Review and accept record drawings • Building inspection services end and the last • Complete Acceptance of Work activities such as Certificate of Occupancy is issued as by issuing letters of acceptance appropriate • Complete and document inspections to ensure permitted work is executed according to permit requirements Please insert narrative summarizing activities and progress towards achievement milestones: Task Order 2 Attachment 3 GA XXXX-XX COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 51 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: S DASH PT RD SIDEWALK PROJECT—85%DESIGN STATUS REPORT&AUTHORIZATION TO BID POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize staff to bid the S Dash Pt Rd Sidewalk Project and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports, and authorization? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: Sept. 9, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business � nn ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Christine Mullen�Y.E., Senior Capital Engineer DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memo dated September 9,2019 Options Considered: 1) Authorize staff to bid the S Dash Pt Rd Sidewalk Project and return to the LUTC and Council to award the project to the lowest responsive,responsible bidder. 2) Do not authorize staff to bid this project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the September 17, 2019 City Council Consent Agend r approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: 1 S f� � DIRECTOR APPROVAL: g 1� Co mint otos lniliaUDatc initial/Date wwllfate COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. V Mark Koppang,Committee Chair Jesse J, inson,Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to bid the S Dash Pt Rd Sidewalk Project and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award,further reports, and authorization." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: E.J. Walsh,P.E., Public Works Directo Christine J.Mullen, P.E., Senior Capital -gineer ' SUBJECT: S Dash Pt Rd Sidewalk Project—85%Design Status Report and Authorization to Bid Financial Impacts: This project was included and is projected to be completed within the approved budget under capital project#212. In accordance with the approved budget this project is funded by a grant from T.I.B. in the amount of$400,000 and the remainder in City funds. Upon completion of this project, ongoing costs associated with operations and maintenance will be performed and funded through streets maintenance. Funding requirements for operations and maintenance of infrastructure is reviewed and adjusted as required during the budget process. Back round Information: This project will construct a sidewalk(8')and bicycle lane(7')along the south side of S Dash Pt Rd along the frontage of Sacajawea Middle School(approximately 900 feet). Also provided are a planter strip with street trees, storm improvements,ADA improvements,and illumination. A grind and inlay to the centerline will also be completed in order to provide a uniform cross slope for the minor widening associated with the new bicycle lane. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 85% complete, which includes the following completed tasks: • Topographic Survey • Project Design to 85% • Utility Coordination • SEPA Application Ongoing Tasks Include: • Project Design to 100% • Contract Specifications • SEPA Approval • Channelization Plan Approval • Lakehaven Interlocal Agreement PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design(by City stafj) $200,000 2019 Construction Cost $940,000 10% Construction Contingency $94,000 Lakehaven Bid Schedule &Project Admin Costs $350,000 Construction Management(by City staff) $70,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,654,000 Rev.6/2019 January 8,2018 Land Use and Transportation Committee S Dash Pt Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 2 AVAILABLE FUNDING: T.I.B. Grant (State) $400,000 City Funds (Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax) $320,000 City Funds (Transfer from Project#194 Savings) $206,228 City Funds (Transfer from Project#204 Savings) $300,000 Lakehaven Water& Sewer District $350,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $1,576,228 PROJECT BUDGET SHORTFALL: -$77,772 After receiving bids, the total project costs will be refined and presented to the Committee and Council for bid award authorization. Staff anticipates bidding this project in October 2019. Construction is anticipated to start in Spring 2020 with an estimated substantial completion date in Fall 2020. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17th,2019 ITEM#: _ 1 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:PORTABLE TOILET SERVICES CONTRACT AMENDMENT POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council amend the contract by adding compensation with Headquarters Portable Toilet services and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract? COMMITTEE: PRHSPS MEETING DATE: September 10th, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Jason Gerwen DEPT: Parks Attachments: Contract Amendment Options Considered: Option 1. Award the contract amendment in the amount of$23,000 for Portable Toilet services for total contract amount of$41,750 to Headquarters and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Option 2. Do not award the contract amendment and provide staff with direction. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option#1 MAYOR APPROVAL: S DIRECTOR APPROVAL: d IS lty G�n nnl t t:�mcil [null/Date Initial/Date initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the proposed Agreement to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. Committee Chair Committe Member Comriftee Memba PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Portable Toilet Services Agreement, and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF CITY HALL e8th Avenue South Fe d e ra I Way Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 w vwcityoffederalmay.com AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEEMENT FOR PORTABLE TOILETS This Amendment ("Amendment No. 1") is made between the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation("City"), and Temporary Storage of Washington,Inc.,dba Head Quarters a Washington corporation or ("Contractor"). The City and Contractor(together"Parties"),for valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the Parties,agree to amend the original Agreement for Portable Toilets("Agreement")dated effective January 18,2018 as follows: 1. AMENDED COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation, as referenced by Section 4 of the Agreement, shall be amended to change the total compensation the City shall pay the Contractor and the rate or method of payment,as delineated in Exhibit B-1,attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.The Contractor agrees that any hourly or flat rate charged by it for its services contracted for herein shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) for the Term. Except as otherwise provided in an attached Exhibit,the Contractor shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes imposed by any lawful jurisdiction as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS. All other terms and provisions of the Agreement, together with any prior amendments thereto,not modified by this Amendment,shall remain in full force and effect.Any and all acts done by either Party consistent with the authority of the Agreement,together with any prior amendments thereto, after the previous expiration date and prior to the effective date of this Amendment, are hereby ratified as having been performed under the Agreement, as modified by any prior amendments,as it existed prior to this Amendment. The provisions of Section 13 of the Agreement shall apply to and govern this Amendment. The Parties whose names appear below swear under penalty of perjury that they are authorized to enter into this Amendment,which is binding on the parties of this contract. [Signature page follows] AMENDMENT - 1 - 3/2017 "I y o 3- CITY HALL era' W 33325 8th Avenue South � Federal Way,WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 w iv afyotfederalwNy.com IN WITNESS, the Parties execute this Agreement below, effective the last date written below. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: ATTEST: By: Jim Ferrell, Mayor Stephanie Courtney, CMC, City Clerk DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. Ryan Call, City Attorney TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WASHINGTON, INC. DBA HEAD QUARTERS: By: Printed Name: Title: Date: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the of that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of --, 20—. Notary's signature Notary's printed name Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires AMENDMENT -2 - 3/2017 CITY Od Federal I I Jtl� CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way,WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 wwwcityotfe-r, ,..u, coin EXHIBIT B-1 ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION 1. Total Compensation:In return for the Services,the City shall pay the Contractor an additional amount not to exceed Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty and NO/100 Dollars ($18,750.00). The total amount payable to Contractor pursuant to the original Agreement,all previous Amendments,and this Amendment shall be an amount not to exceed Forty-One Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty and NO/100 Dollars ($41,750.00). AMENDMENT - 3 - 3/2017 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17, 2019 ITEM#: 5k CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: University of Washington Extra Duty Police Services Agreement POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way,Federal Way Police Department enter into an agreement with the University of Washington (UW)for extra duty police services? COMMITTEE: PRHS&PSC MEETING DATE: Sept. 10,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Kyle Sum ter Deputy Chief of Police DEPT: Police Department Attachments: 1. PRHS&PS Memo 2. UW Police Services Agreement Options Considered: 1. Enter into an extra duty police services agreement with UW 2. Do not enter into an agreement. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: 1 Enter into an agreement for extra duty police services with UW MAYOR APPROVAL: 9 DIRECTOR Ini IRECTORAPPROVAL'141y , r_'unm t ce Ci uncd G COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the University of Washington extra duty police services agreement to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. gmmittee Chair CommitteekMernber Conal ' tee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: I move approval of the University of Washington extra duty police services agreement, and authorize the Police Chief to sign such agreement. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—08/12/2010 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 10, 2019 TO: Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Andy J. Hwang, Chief of Police SUBJECT: University of Washington Extra Duty Police Services Agreement Financial Impacts: Costs for this agreement are reimbursed by the University of Washington. Overall there should be no negative impact to City funds or to the police department's operating budget. Background Information: FWPD Officers have been working extra duty for the University of Washington(UW) since 2014. This year UW requested that we complete a Services Agreement. The term of this agreement is August 15, 2019 through December 31, 2021. The University of Washington has agreed to pay an overtime rate of$72.50 per hour for each officer working in 2019. Beginning January 1, 2020, the hourly rates shall be increased by the same percentage of pay increase in the Federal Way Police Guild bargaining agreement with the City. The extra duty hours will be worked for UW Football games. Officers work this job during their off-duty hours, so this does not impact regular police services for the Federal Way Police Department. 1 City of Federal Way EXTRA DUTY POLICE SERVICES AGREEMENT This agreement is made and entered into this 19- day of 5 2019 by and between the City of Federal Way, Washington (hereafter "City") and Wversity of Washington (UW) WHEREAS, the University of Washington operations occur in and around the City of Seattle; WHEREAS, the University of Washington seeks to contract with the City for police related services or assistance to support University of Washington sporting events; and WHEREAS, the City normally has resources available and is able to provide duly commissioned law enforcement officers to provide police related services to the University of Washington subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the approval of the City's Chief of Police or Designee; and WHEREAS, the duly commissioned officers who may provide such service will be assigned to extra duty under this contract during their off-duty hours which will not conflict with their law enforcement obligation to the City; and WHEREAS, the parties intend that the City be reimbursed, as nearly as possible for ,its cost of providing policing services to the University of Washington and that there shall be neither profit nor subsidy in the rates for such services; and WHEREAS, the parties are authorized to enter into this agreement by virtue of RCW 39.34 and 35.02.225; NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: 3 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this agreement is for the City to provide the University of Washington with law enforcement services through the Federal Way Police Department (FWPD). It is the intent of all parties that the services provided herein shall be provided in conjunction with the University of Washington's Police Department to provide law enforcement services to support University of Washington. 2. SCOPE OF PERFORMANCE, The City shall provide the University of Washington with extra duty police officer services upon request by the University of Washington Police Department. The parties acknowledge that the number of officers and number of hours requested by the University of Washington may fluctuate depending on the University of Washington needs, and the City's Chief of Police and University of Washington's Chief of Police shall work together to Page 1 of 7 UW—Federal Way PD determine the appropriate staffing level. Service provided by the City will be as generally described below: (a) Number of officers: As requested by the University of Washington subject to the approval of the City's Chief of Police. For planning purposes in the first year of this Agreement,the City's Chief of Police has agreed to no more than 6 officers. (b) Hours and dates to be worked: will vary depending on the dates and times of the University of Washington games. (c) � 1_; location of service. As requested by the University of Wes :l i a,ton,subject to the approval of the City's Chief of Police. The Un:v,�rsity of Washington requests service at the University of Wash;n-ton(3939 151h Avenue NE, Seattle, WA.). (d) Duty of Officers: The officers assigned to support the University of Washington in this agreement shall provide law enforcement services for various football games, at the discretion of the City's Chief of Police. Such services shall include but are not limited to addressing issues of safety and security. Service also includes ensuring the safety and security of the patrons, employees, staff and visitors to the University of Washington games. FWPD officers are expected to be at the University of Washington game locations serving as a visual deterrent and liaison to the patrons and employees for a majority of the work shift. These services shall be provided in full uniform and shall be accompanied by a marked or other authorized police vehicle. It is the expectation of the parties that the officers scheduled for a pre- determined shift will be present to complete his/her shifts, except for the following circumstances: agency callback, late call/report from primary employment, family emergency, personal illness, all of which will be e�;cused. .l hz� offi:crs understand that it is their responsibility to make appropriate notification to FWPD management and attempt to find a replacement for their shifts. (e) The City shall furnish and supply all necessary personnel, supervision, equipment, uniforms, communication equipment, vehicles and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder, and shall pay all salaries and employee benefits and other costs in connection therewith. (f) The City shall maintain all records relating to the administration of Page 2 of 7 UW-Federal Way PD this agreement and staffing for same, 3. ADMINISTRATION OF PERSONNEL. All personnel assigned to the University of Washington shall be employed by the City and governed by the City and FWPD laws, rules, policies and collective bargaining agreements. Recruitment, replacement, and performance of all personnel shall be in accordance with such City laws, rules, policies, and agreement; provided however, that the University of Washington may communicate performance concerns of City personnel to the City. Any assignment or re-assignment of personnel will be at the sole discretion of the City's Chief of Police. 4. CONTRACT TERM. The term of performance of the contract shall be from August 15, 2019 through December 31, 2021. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason and at any time when, in its sole discretion, it is in the best interest of the terminating party, by giving one hundred twenty(120) days prior written notice to the other party, 5. COMPENSATION. The University of Washington shall pay the City full reimbursement for all police services furnished under this contract, a fee of$72.50 per hour, per officer; $75.71 per hour, per Corporal; and $94.25 per hour, per Lieutenant in calendar year 2019. On the following holidays the hourly rate shall be $96.67 for officer, $100.94 for Corporal and $125.67 for Lieutenant; January 1 (New Year's Day), July 4 (Independence Day), Thanksgiving Day, the day after Thanksgiving, December 24, December 25 (Christmas Day) and December 31. The hourly rates shall be increased by the same percentage of pay increase in the Federal Way police Guild and Lieutenants bargaining agreements with the City. 6. PAYMENT. The University of Washington shall reimburse the City for law enforcement services described herein pursuant to the all-inclusive payment rate shown above, The City shall invoice The University of Washington on or about the 30th of the month following the service and include detailed service information, including actual service hours. Payment shall be made by a check payable to the City of Federal Way and sent to the City within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of invoice. Payments will include a processing fee of $10.00 per month, Payments to the City that are received later than thirty (30) days following the invoice dates shall accrue interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum on the balance due. All payments shall first be applied to the Page 3 of 7 UW -Federal Way PD accrued interest, The University of Washington shall not be financially liable for scheduled law enforcement services which are not actually performed if non-performance occurred because an officer was unable to complete his shift, However, the University of Washington is financially liable for scheduled law enforcement services at the designated hourly minimum in all other circumstances. 7. COORDINATION WITH CHIEF OF POLICE. The UW Chief of Police or designee will be tasked with coordinating all law enforcement efforts along with the City's FWPD officers. It shall be the responsibility of the UW Chief of Police to deterinine the appropriate coverage, amount of hours, and type of work needed by FWPD officers to support the University of Washington sporting events. The UW Chief of Police will coordinate with the City's Chief of Police as needed, to ensure appropriate levels of law enforcement coverage. 8. DUTY STATUS. Each police officer assigned to work,pursuant to this contract, is subject to call or assignment elsewhere by the City's Chief of Police or the Chief's designee, at any time for emergencies, special assignment, or overtime duty. Extra duty employment shall not infringe or interfere with the officer's primary obligations associated with his or her employment obligations to the City. 9, ADHERENCE TO CITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES-SCOPE OF WORK Police officers engaged in extra duty employment are obligated to discharge all duties of their office and adhere to the City's police department policies and procedures at all times. Such officers shall obey, uphold and enforce the laws of the City and State of Washington and the Constitutions of the State of Washington and the United States of America at all times. Such officers shall understand that while they are on duty or engaged in extra duty assignment under this contract,they may remain subject to the supervision, direction, and/or discipline by the City, and subject to any applicable collective bargaining agreement in effect with the City. Police officers performing work pursuant to this contract shall only provide law enforcement/peaeelceeping services as specified in Section 2(d) of this contract and they are at all times while performing said services subject to the direction and control of the City police department only. 10. NO SPECIAL DUTY TO CONTRACTOR OR OTHERS, Police officers on extra duty assignment have a primary obligation to the City,not the University of Washington. They are expected to discharge all duties of their office while performing pursuant to this contract and are not required to perform any non-law Page 4 of 7 UW- Federal Way PD enforcement/peacekeeping functions for the University of Washington. Furthermore, this contract and performance thereof by City police officers shall not create any special relationship with any person or duties to protect any specific persons from harm or injury including the party signing this contract. The law enforcement/peacelceeping duties to be performed pursuant to this contract are the same in extent and scope as those provided by police officers to every member of the public. 11, NONDISCRIMINATION. The parties shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, creed, age or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap. The City and the University of Washington certify that they are Equal Opportunity Employers, 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City is, and shall at all times be deemed to be, an independent contractor.Nothing herein contained shall be construed as creating the relationship of employer and employee, or principal and agent. betxvccti the University (if Washington and the City or any of the City's agents car employs��s. TI1)--I! ret�iin <ai <U!0101-ity for rendition of services, standar-ds of performance, co±,.trol or personnel, and other matters incident to the performance of services by the City pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this agreement shall make any employee of the University of Washington a City employee or any employee of the City a University of Washington employee for any purpose, including, but not limited to, for withholding of taxes, payment of benefits, worker's compensation pursuant to Title5l RCW, or any other rights or privileges accorded City or University of Washington employees by virtue of their employment. 13. INSURANCE COVERAGE. The City shall maintain at all times during the course of this agreement a general liability insurance policy or other comparable coverage with a self-insured retention of no more than$500,000.00 and a policy limit of no less than$5,000,000.00 dollars. 14. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION. Each party shall be responsible and liable for the consequences of any act or failure to act on the part of itself, its employees or officers. While providing services hereunder, the acts or omissions of extra duty officers in the course and scope of supporting or otherwise providing services to the University of Washington under this Agreement shall be deemed to be acts or omissions of City employees which shall be the sole responsibility of the City. Each party shall be responsible for its own negligence and f that of its employees. Each party shall defend, indemnify and save harmless, the other Page 5 of 7 UW-Federal Way PD party or the other party's officers, employees and agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments or awards of damages, resulting or arising from the acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, its officers or employees arising out of or in connection with the performance of this agreement. This indemnity provision shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 15, DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of a dispute in the administration of this agreement, the UW Chief of Police or designee shall discuss the dispute with the City's Chief of Police in an attempt to resolve the problem. If the University of Washington and the City are unable to resolve a claim or dispute stemming from this Agreement, the parties agree to participate in non-binding mediation before a third party professional mediator, whose selection will be mutually agreed upon. The cost of mediating the dispute will be borne equally by both parties, and mediation should occur within thirty (30) days of a request by either party to engage in mediation.No claim or suit may be brought until the dispute resolution procedures as set forth in this section have been exhausted. If dispute resolution efforts under this section are not successful, either party may institute legal action to enforce the terms and conditions of this agreement. 16. NOTICES All notices and other material to be delivered under this contract shall be in writing and shall be delivered or mailed to the following address: City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave. S. Federal Way,WA 98003 Attn: Kyle Sumpter,Deputy Chief lcyle.sumpter@cityoffederalway.com University of Washington 3939 15"'Ave.NE Seattle,WA 98105 Attn: Steve Rittereiser,Major ritters@uw,edu Or such other addresses as either party may,from time to time, designate in writing. ' 17. SIGNATURES. The parties agree that all signatures, whether original, copy or faxed on this agreement will be considered originals. i Page 6 of 7 UW-Federal Way PD i 18. SEVERABILITY. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 19. CONFLICTS. In the event of a conflict between any other agreements between the parties including,this Agreement shall govern. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. No modification or amendment of this contract shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties after approval of their respective governing body. This contract contains the entire agreement between the parties and may not be enlarged, modified or altered except in writing signed by the parties. In WITNESS hereof,the parties have executed this Agreement on this date, the day of , 2019. I City of Federal Way Ur: v,.'is,i ',-of Washington + AL 2d 81/12 17 hn-� 21�;Vlll wwrg -c4lef on a 1' once 1 Dater all W ,In erim Chief of Police/Date C�i of 0 Po�i�e `J Approved as to legal form only: Approved as to legal form only: Ryan Call, City Attorney/Date `-- University of Washington/Date v i E Page 7 of 7 UW-Federal Way PD a COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17, 2019 ITEM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING OFFICE SPACE FOR THE PUGET SOUND AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE POLICY QUESTION: Should the City enter into an amended interlocal agreement that reduces the monthly cost of the lease from $5,000.00 to$2,916.66 per month? COMMITTEE: PRHS&PSC MEETING DATE: 9/10/19 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Commander Chris Norman DEPT.: Police Department Attachments: 1.PRHS&PSC Staff Memo 2.Amended Interlocal Agreement Options Considered: 1. Accept the amendment. 2. Reject the recommendation to accept the amendment. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option#1 MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: L Ch),h f ' Cn n llcc ciof;- ItutiaLDatc Initial/Date Initia/Date VI 1/17 lip COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the proposed amended interlocal agreement to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. ,.. mmittee Chair Committee Ntember Commi Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "1 move approval of the amended interlocal agreement with an effective date af.July 1, 2019 and authorize Mayor Ferrell to sign said agreement. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BYCITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 17, 2019 TO: Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Andy J. Hwang, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Amended Interlocal Agreement with City of Auburn to Reduce Costs of Leased Space for PSATT Operations. Financial Impacts: There is no financial impact to the City of Federal Way or the Federal Way Police Departments budget. The lease agreement costs are covered by Washington Auto Theft prevention Authority (WATPA) Grants. Background The Federal Way Police Department(FWPD) is the lead administrative agency of the Puget Sound Auto Theft Task Force (PSATT). The task force, 11 detectives and 2 sergeants, are housed in office space leased from the City of Auburn. PSATT is grant funded by the Washington Auto Theft Prevention Authority (WATPA). Due to a shortfall in the 2019-2021 grant funding award Federal Way asked Auburn to reduce the cost of the office space. Auburn agreed to reduce the monthly cost for rent and utilities from $5,000.00 per month to $2,916.66 per month and drafted the attached amended interlocal establishing the new rates. Staff Recommendation The rate reduction provided in the amendment reduces the cost by $50,000 over the two-year grant cycle which allows PSATT to continuing using the office space. Staff recommends the amendment is accepted and approved. 1 AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING OFFICE SPACE FOR THE PUGET SOUND AUTO THEFT TASK-FORCE THIS AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day of . 2019, between the CITY OF AUBURN, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington ( "Auburn"), and the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ( "Federal Way") ("Parties"). RECITALS: A. Federal Way is the Lead Administrative Agency for the Puget Sound Auto Theft Task-Force (PSATT), established through an Interlocal agreement, adopted by Auburn City Council under Resolution 5303 between the cities of Federal Way, Auburn, Bonney lake, Lakewood, Tacoma, and Tukwila, the Washington State Patrol, the Pierce County Sheriff's Office, the King County Prosecutor's Office, and the Pierce County Prosecutor's Office, to combat automobile theft in the Puget Sound area through coordinated law enforcement; and B. As the Lead Administrative Agency, Federal Way is authorized to expend Washington Auto Theft Prevention Authority grant funds for eligible expenses associated with the operation of the PSATT, including the leasing of office space for the operations of the PSATT; and C. On November 6"', 2017 the Parties entered into an Agreement adopted by Auburn City Council under Resolution 5324 for the establishment of office and vehicle parking space; and WHEREAS, Federal Way has notified the City that the grant amount has been reduced for the next funding cycle, and has asked the City to reduce the cost of the facility; and WHEREAS, The City of Auburn believes it to be in the best interest of the public to amend the Agreement. AGREEMENT: 1. Section 3 is amended by adding a new section F to read as follows: F. For the grant cycle beginning July 1, 2019 and ending June 30, 2021, Federal Way agrees to pay a total of Two Thousand, Nine Hundred Sixteen Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($2,916.66) per month for base rent and utilities. 2. Section 8 is amended by adding a new section J. Execution in Counterpart to read as follows: J. Execution in Counterpart_This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which deemed to be an original against any party whose signature appears thereon, and all of which together constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement will become First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement between City of Auburn and the City of Federal Way Original Agreement for Office and Parking space under Resolution 5324 Page 1 binding when one or more counterparts, individually or taken together bear the signatures of the parties reflected hereon as the signatories. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS AGREED TO IN THE AGREEMENT INCLUDING THE TERMINATION PROVISON IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPH TWO SHALL REMAIN THE SAME. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF AUBURN CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Nancy Backus, Auburn Mayor Jim Ferrell, Federal Way Mayor Attest: Attest: Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk Stephanie Courtney, Federal Way City Clerk Approved as to form: Approved as to form: Steven L. Gross, Auburn City Attorney J. Ryan Call, Federal Way City Attorney First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement between City of Auburn and the City of Federal Way Original Agreement for Office and Parking space under Resolution 5324 Page 2 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 5m CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Ballistic Vest Partnership (BVP) Grant. POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way, Federal Way Police Department apply for the 2019 Ballistic Vest Partnership (BVP) Grant; and, if awarded, accept the Grant with matching City funds? COMMITTEE: PRHS&PSC MEETING DATE: Sept. 10,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: K. Gregory, Quartermaster/L. Allen, Office Mgr DEPT: Police Department Attachments: 1. PRHS&PS Memo 2. Letter to the Chief Options Considered: 1. Approve the Federal Way Police Department application for the 2019 BVP Grant, and acceptance of the Grant if awarded. 2. Deny Application MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: 1 Approve the 2018 BVP Grant rt MAYOR APPROVAL: "C111-111 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: � l Y)C nmrt ,c C7 nidal COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the 2019 Ballistic Vest Partnership (BVP) Grant application and acceptance request to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. ornmittee Chair Committe Member Conyvittee Membe PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the 2019 Ballistic Vest Partnership (BVP) Grant application with matching City funds, and authorize the Police Chief to sign such Agreement if awarded. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED IST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE# _ RLVISL-D—08/12/2010 RESOLUTION 9 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 10, 2019 TO: Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Andy J. Hwang, Chief of Police SUBJECT: 2019 Ballistic Vest Partnership (BVP) Grant Funds. The Federal Way Police Department has a ballistic vest mandatory wear policy for all officers. As the vests expire (every 5 years), the department purchases replacement vests. By 6/1/2021, it is estimated that the Federal Way Police Department will need to purchase 65 ballistic vests.Each vest will cost approximately$1200.00.The total cost to the City of Federal Way is estimated to be $78,000.00. The purpose of the Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Program is to reimburse up to 50% of the cost of body armor vests purchased for law enforcement officers.The 2019 BVP award amount will be announced and available in the 3rd quarter of 2019.Awarded funds will expire on 8/31/2021;City matching funds will be taken from the Police Uniform budget (001-2100-111-521-21-330). The Federal Way Police Department is seeking approval to apply for the Ballistic Vest Partnership Grant during the 2019 application period and that matching funds be set aside if awarded. 1 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Federal Way Police Department MEMORANDUM To: Andy J. Hwang, Chief of Police From: Kristen Gregory, Quartermaster Date: July 26, 2019 Subject: Recommendation for 2018 Ballistic Vest Program Grant application The Federal Way Police Department has a ballistic vest mandatory wear policy for all officers. As the vests expire (every 5 years), the department purchases replacement vests. By 6/1/2021, it is estimated that the Federal Way Police Department will need to purchase 65 ballistic vests. Each vest will cost approximately $1200.00. The total cost to the City of Federal Way is estimated to be $78,000.00. The purpose of the Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Program is to reimburse up to 50% of the cost of body armor vests purchased for law enforcement officers. The 2019 BVP award amount will be announced and available in the 3`d quarter of 2019. Awarded funds will expire on 8/31/2021; City matching funds will be taken from the Police Uniform budget (001-2100-111-521-21-330). I am seeking approval to accept and set aside 2019 Ballistic Vest Partnership matching funds if awarded by the Department of Justice. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#:_ 5n. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: KING COUNTY REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER COST REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Of Federal Way/Federal Way Police Department accept the Registered Sex Offender (RSO) Overtime Cost Reimbursement Agreement from the King County Sheriff's Office (KCSO)? COMMITTEE: PRHS&PSC MEETING DATE: Sept. 10,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY; Lynette Allen, Chief's Office Manager DEPT: Police Attachments: 1. PRHS&PS Staff Memo 2. KCSO Cost Reimbursement Agreement Options Considered: 1. Accept the KCSO RSO Overtime Cost Reimbursement Agreement 2. Reject the KCSO RSO Cost Overtime Reimbursement Agreement MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: 1.Accept the KCSO RSO Overtime Cost Reimbursement Agreement MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: mitt �C- C') Initial COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move to forward the RSO Overtime Cost Reimbursement Agreement between the Federal Way Police Department and the King County Sheriff's Office to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda,fo•approval. " ommittee Chair Committee M tuber Col ttee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to accept the RSO Overtime Cost Reimbursement Agreement between the Federal Way Police Department and the King County Sheriff's Office and authorize the Chief of Police to execute said Agreement." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—08/12/2010 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 10, 2019 TO: Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Andy J. Hwang, Chief of Police SUBJECT: King County Sheriff's Office (KCSO), Registered Sex Offender(RSO) Cost Reimbursement Agreement Financial Impacts: Overall, there should be no negative impact to the City funds or to the police department's operating budget. The revenue to the City for the King County Sheriff's Office (KCSO) Registered Sex Offender (RSO) Cost Reimbursement Agreement will be up to a maximum amount of$19,020.11 for officer overtime reimbursement. The overtime our officer(s) work will be billed to KCSO for the Police Department in account number 001-0000-090-337-07-004. Back-,round Information: The Federal Way Police Department (FWPD) will receive grant funding from the King County Sheriff s Department in support of the Federal Way Police Department's Registered Sex Offender and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program. The grant is for reimbursement of overtime expenses incurred while verifying current addresses and residencies of sex and kidnapping offenders, up to a maximum amount of$19,020.11. FWPD will be partnering with the King County Government in implementing multiple program elements to ensure that sex offenders are in compliance under the guidelines of current laws. A strong enforcement effort to apprehend and prosecute offenders will help improve the quality of life for our citizens. We have been participating in the King County RSO Grant Funding since at least 2009. 1 Cost Reimbursement Agreement Executed By King County Sheriffs Office, a department of King County, hereinafter referred to as "KCSO," Department Authorized Representative: Mitzi Johanknecht, Sheriff King County Sheriff's Office W-150 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 and Federal Way Police Department, a department of the City of Federal Way, hereinafter referred to as""Contractor," Department Authorized Representative: Andy Hwang, Chief of Police 33325 8 Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98003 WHEREAS, KCSO and Contractor have mutually agreed to work together for the purpose of verifying the address and residency of registered sex and kidnapping offenders; and WHEREAS, the goal of registered sex and kidnapping offender address and residency verification is to improve public safety by establishing a greater presence and emphasis by Contractor in King County neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, as part of this coordinated effort, Contractor will increase immediate and direct contact with registered sex and kidnapping offenders in their jurisdiction, and WHEREAS,KCSO is the recipient of a Washington State Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program grant through the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs for this purpose, and WHEREAS, KCSO will oversee efforts undertaken by program participants in King County; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: KCSO will utilize Washington State Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program funding to reimburse for expenditures associated Cost Reimbursement Agreement with the Contractor for the verification of registered sex and kidnapping offender address and residency as set forth below. This Interagency Agreement contains eleven (11) Articles: ARTICLE I. TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this Cost Reimbursement Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2019 and shall end on June 30, 2020 unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions hereof. ARTICLE II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES This agreement is for the purpose of reimbursing the Contractor for participation in the Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program. The program's purpose is to verify the address and residency of all registered sex and kidnapping offenders under RCW 9A.44.130. The requirement of this program is for face-to-face verification of a registered sex and kidnapping offender's address at the place of residency. In the case of • level I offenders, once every twelve months. • of level II offenders, once every six months. • of level III offenders, once every three months. For the purposes of this program unclassified offenders and kidnapping offenders shall be considered at risk level I, unless in the opinion of the local jurisdiction a higher classification is in the interest of public safety. ARTICLE III. REPORTING Two reports are required in order to receive reimbursement for grant:related expenditures. Both forms are included as exhibits to this agreement. "Exhibit A" is the Offender Watch generated "Registered Sex Offender Verification Request (WA)" that the sex or kidnapping offender completes and signs during a face-to-face contact. "Exhibit B" is an"Officer Contact Worksheet" completed in full by an officer/detective during each verification contact. Both exhibits representing each contact are due quarterly and must be complete and received before reimbursement can be made following the quarter reported. Original signed report forms are to be submitted by the 5th of the month following the end of the quarter. The first report is due October 5, 2019. Quarterly progress reports shall be delivered to Attn: Tina Keller, Project Manager King County Sheriff's Office 500 Fourth Avenue, Suite 200 M/S ADM-SO-0200 Seattle, WA 98104 Page 2 of 6 August 11,2019 Cost Reimbursement Agreement Phone: 206-263-2122 Email: tina.keller@kingcounty.gov ARTICLE IV. REIMBURSEMENT Requests for reimbursement will be made on a monthly basis and shall be forwarded to KCSO by the 10th of the month following the billing period. Please note the following terms will be adhered to for the 2019-2020 Registered Sex Offender Address Verification Program: • Any agency not meeting at least 90% of required verifications will not receive that quarter's grant payment. • Any agency not using Offender Watch to track verifications will not receive that quarter's grant payment. Overtime reimbursements for personnel assigned to the Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program will be calculated at the usual rate for which the individual's' time would be compensated in the absence of this agreement. Each request for reimbursement will include the name, rank, overtime compensation rate, number of reimbursable hours claimed and the dates of those hours for each officer for whom reimbursement is sought. Each reimbursement request must be accompanied by a certification signed by an appropriate supervisor of the department that the request has been personally reviewed,that the information described in the request is accurate, and the personnel for whom reimbursement is claimed were working on an overtime basis for the Registered Sex and Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program. Overtime and all other expenditures under this Agreement are restricted to the following criteria: 1. For the purpose of verifying the address and residency of registered sex and kidnapping offenders; and 2. For the goal of improving public safety by establishing a greater presence and emphasis in King County neighborhoods; and 3. For increasing immediate and direct contact with registered sex and kidnapping offenders in their jurisdiction Page 3 of 6 August 11,2019 Cost Reimbursement Agreement Any non-overtime related expenditures must be pre-approved by KCSO. Your request for pre-approval must include: 1) The item you would like to purchase, 2) The purpose of the item, 3) The cost of the item you would like to purchase. You may send this request for pre-approval in email format. Requests for reimbursement from KCSO for the above non-overtime expenditures must be accompanied by a spreadsheet detailing the expenditures as well as a vendor's invoice and a packing slip. The packing slip must be signed by an authorized representative of the Contractor. All costs must be included in the request for reimbursement and be within the overall contract amount. Over expenditures for any reason, including additional cost of sales tax, shipping, or installation, will be the responsibility of the Contractor. Requests for reimbursement must be sent to Attn: Tina Keller, Project Manager King County Sheriff's Office 500 Fourth Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 206-263-2122 Email: tina.keller@kingcounty.gov The maximum amount to be paid under this cost reimbursement agreement shall not exceed Nineteen Thousand Twenty Dollars and Eleven Cents ($19,020.11). Expenditures exceeding the maximum amount shall be the responsibility of Contractor. All requests for reimbursement must be received by KCSO by July 31, 2020 to be payable. ARTICLE V. WITNESS STATEMENTS "Exhibit C" is a"Sex/Kidnapping Offender Address and Residency Verification Program Witness Statement Form." This form is to be completed by any witnesses encountered during a contact when the offender is suspected of not living at the registered address and there is a resulting felony"Failure to Register as a Sex Offender" case to be referred/filed with the KCPAO. Unless, due to extenuating circumstances the witness is incapable of writing out their own statement,the contacting officer/detective will have the witness write and sign the statement in their own handwriting to contain, verbatim, the information on the witness form. ARTICLE VI. FILING NON-DISCOVERABLE FACE SHEET "Exhibit D" is the "Filing Non-Discoverable Face Sheet." This form shall be attached to each"Felony Failure to Register as a Sex Offender" case that is referred to the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. ARTICLE VII. SUPPLEMENTING, NOT SUPPLANTING Page 4 of 6 August 11,2019 Cost Reimbursement Agreement Funds may not be used to supplant (replace) existing local, state, or Bureau of Indian Affairs funds that would be spent for identical purposes in the absence of the grant. Overtime - To meet this grant condition, you must ensure that: • Overtime exceeds expenditures that the grantee is obligated or funded to pay for registered sex and kidnapping offender address and residency verification in the current budget. Funds currently allocated to pay for registered sex and kidnapping offender address and residency verification overtime may not be reallocated to other purposes or reimbursed upon the award of a grant. • Additionally, by the conditions of this grant, you are required to track all overtime funded through the grant. ARTICLE VIII. HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION Contractor shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless King County, its officers, employees, and agents from any and all costs, claims,judgments, and/or awards of damages, arising out of, or in any way resulting from, the negligent acts or omissions of Contractor, its officers, employees, contractors, and/or agents related to Contractor's activities under this Agreement. Contractor agrees that its obligations under this paragraph extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or on behalf of any of its employees or agents. For this purpose, Contractor, by mutual negotiation, hereby waives, as respects King County only, any immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event King County incurs any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom including attorney's fees to enforce the provisions of this article, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be recoverable from Contractor. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE IX. INSURANCE Contractor shall maintain insurance policies, or programs of self-insurance, sufficient to respond to all of its liability exposures under this Agreement. The insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the Contractor engaged in work contemplated in this Agreement shall respond to claims within the i_01IoNN,,in,I C0%01 1210 types and amounts: General Liability. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form number CG 00 01 covering COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY. $5,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence, and for those policies with aggregate limits, a$5,000,000 aggregate limit. King County, its officers, officials, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the City. Additional Insured status shall include Products-Completed Operations-CG 20 10 11/85 or its equivalent. Page 5 of 6 August 11,2019 Cost Reimbursement Agreement By requiring such liability coverage as specified in this Article IX, King County has not, and shall not be deemed to have, assessed the risks that may be applicable to Contractor. Contractor shall assess its own risks and, if deemed appropriate and/or prudent, maintain greater limits or broader coverage than is herein specified. Contractor agrees to maintain, through its insurance policies, self-funded program or an alternative risk of loss financing program, coverage for all of its liability exposures for the duration of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to provide KCSO with at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of any material change or alternative risk of loss financing program. ARTICLE X. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES There are no third party beneficiaries to this agreement. This agreement shall not impart any right enforceable by any person or entity that is not a party hereto. ARTICLE XI. AMENDMENTS No modification or amendment of the provisions hereof shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. The parties hereto expressly reserve the right to modify this Agreement, by mutual agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement by having their representatives affix their signatures below. Federal Way Police Department KING COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Andy Hwang, Chief of Police Mitzi Johanknecht, Sheriff Date Date Page 6 of 6 August 11,2019 ®' Page: 1 Verification Request Agency: King County WA Sheriffs Office Administrator: King County Sheriffs Office RSCPhone: (206)263-2120 Date: 6!1612016 Offender Information Offender Photo Name test,test Registration# 2353765 POB SSN DOB 01/01/1990 Age 26 Alt Reg# Sex Orient Drv.Lie./State PHOTO NOT,AVAILABLE Race Nat. No Selection FBI Height Hair State ID Weight Eyes Last Verified: Risk Type Date Comm. i Active Officer Alert LOOK HERE FOR OFFICER SAFETY INFORMATION Employment/School Name Address Supervisor Phone Residence (Bold-Primary Home Address) Street Alins Phone (Bold-Primary Contact Num bcrs) Sears/Tattoos Number i'ypc, Description Location Type DeserIption Vehicle Make Model Color Year License State VIN Comments Offense Date RS Code/Description Convicted Released Case# Crime Details I i I do hereby attest, under penalties of perjury,that any and all information contained here is j I current and accurate on this „__day of 20 I Offender Signature: Officer Signature: Date: r I Produced by OffenderWalch-www.watchsystems.com i' . o W w � w C) a a a N W W O � z w � P4 w z A ° Hp *0 � ° oWw Ww Ww zaz w o � Lw 11 a ii a W w ° O ❑ ❑ a w O ❑ ❑ � ww W O P4 0� 0 f-4 O �ozO w � p � p � o � w ►- b Wv� WWW a W � Qw � ° W ,I- If) W wz .4 W W H x a H v EXHIBIT C Date Agency/Officer Incident number Witness Statement—Failure to Register Suspect's Name: Suspect's Last Registered Address: Witness'Name: Witness's Home Address: Witness' Home Phone Number Cell: Other: How do they know the suspect(please be as detailed as possible)? *If suspect rented an apartment or a room from the witness,please have them provide a copy of any documentations to this effect and any documentations the suspect moved out. Did the witness ever see the suspect at his/her last registered address? How often would they see him/her there? When did the witness start seeing him/her there? When did they stop? Why did the suspect stop staying at the address? Did the suspect keep any personal belongings there? In general, when is the last time they saw the suspect? Do they know where the suspect moved to or their current whereabouts? Can they provide the names and contact information of any other witnesses who would have seen the suspect staying at his/her last registered address? Is the witness willing to assist in prosecution? Under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, I certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Witness' Signature date EXHIBIT D WASPC GRANT FILING NON-DISCOVERABLE TO: KCPAO—Special Assault Unit—Seattle DATE: FROM. INCIDENT#: AGENCY: SUSPECT#1: DOB: RACE: SEX: M ❑ F❑ I HGT: WGT: SUSP#1 ADDRESS: CHARGE: Failure to Register as a Sex Offender DATE OF CRIME: VICTIM#1: State of Washington DOB VICTIM#2: DOB: INTERVIEWED BY: NO ONE DPA NAME: TYPE OF CASE: FTR-Failure To Register OTHER TYPE: THIS CASE IS BEING REFERRED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS FILING OF CHARGES: - Comments: DECLINE: - Comments: __WA S-PC STATISTICAL REPORTING TO KCSO Case Referral Received by KCPAO on this date: Case filed by KCPAO: YES ❑ NO ❑ Cause Number Assigned: If no, please indicate why: Other Explanation: COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 5O CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT(JAG) PROGRAM FOR FY 2017 POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way,Federal Way Police Department accept the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) Grant for FY 2017? Acceptance of grant requires no matching funds. COMMITTEE: PARKS,RECREATION,HUMAN SERVICES AND PUBLIC MEETING DATE: SAFETY COUNCIL COMMITTEE—(PRHS&PSC) September 10, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: DIANE C. SHINES,CIVILIAN OPERATIONS MANAGER DEPT: POLICE Attachments: 1. PRHS &PS Staff Report 2. Resubmittal Cover Letter 3. Grantee Certifications and Assurances 4. JAG 2017 Grant Award 5. JAG 2017 Budget Worksheet Options Considered: 1. Accept the FY 2017 JAG Grant 2. Reject the FY 2017 JAG Grant MAYOR'S RECOMMEND ION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: Q DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Corn iri ' Cour•il Gurml'1)atc Initis+'Darc Initiallate COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:I move to forward the FY 2017 JAG Grant to the September 17, 2019 consent agenda for approval. mmittee Chair Committee M mber Coi ee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION:I move approval of the FY 2017 JAG Grant (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: September 10, 2019 TO: City Council Members VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Andy Hwang, Chief of Police SUBJECT: FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program Financial Impacts: Funds are requested to provide temporary support personnel in the Information Technology Department to support GIS improvement for address verification and enhanced GIS mapping. The salary is based upon an average hourly rate of$18 per hour and 1907 hours worked. Background The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) Program is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to state and local jurisdictions. JAG funds support all components of the criminal justice system. JAG funded projects may address crime through the provision of services directly to individuals and/or communities and by improving the effectiveness and efficiency of criminal justice systems, processes, and procedures. The City of Seattle is identified as the Fiscal Agent, submitting the joint application to the Bureau of Justice Assistance to request JAG program funds; and pursuant to the terms of the grant, the City of Seattle is to distribute grant funds to the County and one or more jurisdictions. The City of Seattle ("City") is resubmitting its Grant Award Document and Certifications Document for the Fiscal Year(FY) 2017 Byrne Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) Award per the guidance provided by the Department of Justice("DOJ"),but continues its strong objection to certain conditions, specifically Paragraph 7 of the Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive regarding the compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1373 and conditions 52 through 56. The DOJ's authority to require compliance with Award Conditions 52 through 56 in FY 2017 JAG awards is the subject of pending litigation. DOJ has determined that it will not use or enforce those conditions in FY 2017 JAG awards to the ("City"). Proposal The Department proposes to use its share of the grant to fund temporary IT support staff. The JAG Program allows for investment in technology and equipment improvements to enhance efficiencies, and service to the Community through the Police Department. Staffing levels in the Information Technology Department have fallen short of expectations, delaying much needed upgrades and enhancements to law enforcement programs, specifically GIS systems. The lack of 1 upgrades/enhancements have resulted in significant staff hours scrubbing data and utilizing time consuming verification processes to produce critical data needed for regional information sharing. IT Support personnel will serve to support a number of planned technology improvements in 2018; to include; enhanced geographical verification, improved validity of crime data, increase mapping capability, and improve necessary infrastructure upgrades to support a number of data sharing and data driven analysis initiatives. Deliverables include increased accuracy of real-time incidents that are being traced and reported into regional databases to combat gun violence, violent gangs, and support collaborative data driven prosecution. Specific projects are described in the attached financial and narrative summary document. Project Award: $34,331. Program Need: Provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological advances to enhance safety and create efficiencies that allow officers and staff more time serving the citizens of Federal Way. The Federal Way Police Department and Information Technology Department will provide a project management matrix that identifies the scope of work,timelines, target dates, and milestones. 2 011+�1 City of Seattle Mayor Jenny A. Durkan May 9, 2019 Mr. Matt Dummermuth Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance/Office of Justice Assistance 810 Seventh Street, NW Washington, DC 20531s RE: FY 2017 Byrne JAG Award #2017-DJ-BX-0496 Dear Mr. Dummermuth, The City of Seattle("City") is resubmitting its Grant Award Document and Certifications Document for the FY 2017 Byrne Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)Award per the guidance provided by the Department of Justice ("DOJ"). In so doing,the City accepts this award but rejects certain conditions, as outlined below. The City continues to maintain its strong objection to certain conditions,specifically Paragraph 7 of the Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive regarding compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1373 and Conditions 52 through 56, inclusive in the Grant Award and Special Conditions document.Although the City has not modified or crossed out the Special Conditions 52 through 56, please note the prominent disclaimer the City has appended to the text of these documents. Nothing in Seattle's acceptance of this award shall be construed as a certification of compliance with Paragraph 7 of the certification document or as an acceptance of Award Special Conditions 52, 53,54, SS,or 56 in the Grant Award and Special Conditions documents.Without waiving any other arguments, claims,or defenses,the City asserts the Special Conditions placed upon the award and disbursement of FY 2017 JAG funds are unlawful, unconstitutional, unenforceable, and ultra vires. Please do not hesitate to contact me at(206) 684-5452 or via email at Mictielle.ChenPSeattleF-cv, if you have any questions. Sincerely, [' Q ichelle 5. Chen Legal Counsel, Mayor of Seattle cc: Pete Holmes,Seattle City Attorney Kenny Pittman, Office of Intergovernmental Relations Office of the Mayor 1 600 Fourth Avenue,P.O.Box 94749,Seattle,WA 98124 1 206-684-4000 1 seattle.gov/mayor V.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Program FY 2017 Local Solicitation Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government On behalf of the applicant unit of local government named below, in support of that locality's application for an award under the FY 2017 Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant("JAG") Program, and further to 34 U.S C_ § 10153(a , 1 initial certify to the Office of Justice Programs("OJP"), U.S. Department of Justice("USDOJ"),that all of the following are true and correct: 1. 1 am the chief executive of the applicant unit of local government named below, and I have the authority to make the following representations on my own behalf and on behalf of the applicant unit of local government. I understand that these representations will be relied upon as material in any OJP decision to make an award, under the application described above, to the applicant unit of local government. 2. 1 certify that no federal funds made available by the award (if any' that OJP makes based on the application described above will be used to supplant local funds, but will be used to increase the amounts of such funds that would, in the absence of federal funds, be made available for law enforcement activities. 3. 1 assure that the application described above(and any amendment to that application) was submitted for review to the governing body of the unit of local government(e.g., city council or county commission), or to an organization designated by that governing body, not less than 30 days before the date of this certification. 4. 1 assure that, before the date of this certification—(a)the application described above(and any amendment to that application)was made public-, and (b) an opportunity to comment on that application (or amendment)was provided to citizens and to neighborhood or community-based organizations,to the extent applicable law or established procedure made such an opportunity available. 5. 1 assure that, for each fiscal year of the award (if any)that OJP makes based on the application described above, the applicant unit of local government will maintain and report such data. records, and information initial (programmatic and financial), as OJP may reasonably require- 6. 1 have carefully reviewed 34 U.S.C. § 10153(a)(5)and,with respect to the p;ograms to be funded by the award(if any), I hereby make the certification required by section 10153(a)(5), as to each of the items specified initial therein. 7 1 have e a r fication entitled"State or Local Government: FY 2017 Cenific i f-Ga ce wi h 6 U.S.C. § 1373'* ecuted by the chis a ao L wt respect to the FY 2017 JAG program an su itted in su rt -e ion described a ove. I have no reason to initial b 'P� a ion to a false-or othe ncorrect. Signat f Chief E 'e tive of the Applicant Unit of Date of tertlfkation Local ov rnment Je A. Durkan Mayor Printed Name of Chief Executive Title of Chief Executive City of Seattle, Washington Name of Applicant Unit of Local Government *Acceptance of Byrne-JAG 2017 funds by Plaintiffs New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Washington,and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia—and by the political subdivisions of Plaintiff states—shall not be construed as acceptance of Special Conditions 11¶52-56. Nor shall these initial conditions be enforced against these grantees given Judge Ramos's ruling in New York et ai., v. U.S. Departmentof Justice etol., 18 Civ. 6471 (ER) (ECF 114 and 122) (S.D.N.Y.) where these disputed conditions were enjoined for the reasons stated therein, including that 8 U.S.C_§ 1373 was unconstitutional and not within the purview of"all applicable laws" as referenced in 34 U.S.C. § 1D153(a). Rev.August 10,2018 C�11 U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of the Assistant Attorney General Ifashingeon,D.C. 2O531 October 10,2018 The Honorable Ed Murray City of Seattle 700 5th Avenue,Suite 5800 Seattle,WA 98124-4708 Dear Mayor Murray: On behalf of Attorney General Jefferson Sessions III,it is my pleasure to inform you that the Office of Justice Programs has approved your application for funding under the FY 17 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)Program- Local Solicitation in the amount of$657,975 for City of Seattle. Enclosed you will find the Grant Award and Special Conditions documents. This award is subject to all administrative and financial requirements,including the timely submission of all financial and programmatic reports,resolution of all interim audit findings,and the maintenance of a minimum level of cash-on-hand. Should you not adhere to these requirements,you will be in violation of the terms of this agreement and the award will be subject to termination for cause or other administrative action as appropriate. If you have questions regarding this award,please contact: Program Questions,Jeffrey S.Felten-Green,Program Manager at(202)514-8874;and Financial Questions,the Office of the Chief Financial Officer,Customer Service Center(CSC)at (800)458-0786,or you may contact the CSC at ask.ocfo@usdoj.gov. Congratulations,and we look forward to working with you. Sincerely, -Aw„Y,...� Matt Dummermuth Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Enclosures r OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS Office of Justice Programs US. Department of Justice w 810 7th Street,NW Washington,DC 20531 Tel:(202)307-0690 TTY:(202)307-2027 E-mail:ask0CR@usdoj.gov Website:www.ojp.usdoj_gov/ocr OCR Letter to All Recipients October 10,2018 The Honorable Ed Murray City of Seattle 700 5th Avenue,Suite 5800 Seattle,WA 98124-4705 Dear Mayor Murray: Congratulations on your recent award. In establishing financial assistance programs,Congress linked the receipt of federal funding to compliance with federal civil rights laws. The Office for Civil Rights(OCR),Office of Justice Programs(OJP),U.S.Department of Justice (DOJ)is responsible for ensuring that recipients of financial assistance from the OJP,the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS),and the Office on Violence Against Women(OVW)comply with the applicable federal civil rights laws. We at the OCR are available to help you and your organization meet the civil rights requirements that come with DOJ funding. Ensuring Access to Federally Assisted Programs Federal laws that apply to recipients of financial assistance from the DOJ prohibit discrimination on the basis of race,color,national origin, religion,sex,or disability in funded programs or activities,not only in employment but also in the delivery of services or benefits. A federal law also prohibits recipients from discriminating on the basis of age in the delivery of services or benefits. In March of 2013,President Obama signed the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013. The statute amends the Violence Against Women Act of 1994(VAWA)by including a nondiscrimination grant condition that prohibits discrimination based on actual or perceived race,color,national origin,religion,sex,disability,sexual orientation,or gender identity. The new nondiscrimination grant condition applies to certain programs funded after October 1,2013. The OCR and the OVW have developed answers to some frequently asked questions about this provision to assist recipients of VAWA funds to understand their obligations. The Frequently Asked Questions are available at https:Hojp.gov/about/ocr/vawafags.htm, Fnforeing Civil Rights Laws All recipients of federal financial assistance,regardless of the particular funding source,the amount of the grant award,or the number of employees in the workforce,are subject to prohibitions against unlawful discrimination. Accordingly,the OCR investigates recipients that are the subject of discrimination complaints from both individuals and groups. In addition,based on regulatory criteria,the OCR selects a number of recipients each year for compliance reviews,audits that require recipients to submit data showing that they are providing services equitably to all segments of their service population and that their employment practices meet equal opportunity standards. Providing Services to Limited English Proficiency(LEP)Individuals in accordance with DOJ guidance pertaining to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C.§2000d,recipients of federal financial assistance must take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to their programs and activities for persons with limited English proficiency(LEP). See U.S.Department of Justice,Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition Against Irrational Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons,67 Fed.Reg.41,455(2002). For more information on the civil rights responsibilities that recipients have in providing language services to LEP individuals,please see the website pups://www.lep.gov. Ensuring Equal Treatment of Faith-Based Organizations and Safeguarding Constitutional Protections Related to Religion The DOJ regulation,Partnerships with Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood Organizations,28 C.F.R.pt.38,updated in April 2016, prohibits all recipient organizations,whether thev are law enforcement agencies,governmental agencies,educational institutions,houses of worship,or faith-based organizations,from using financial assistance from the DOJ to fund explicitly religious activities. Explicitly religious activities include worship,religious instruction,or proselytiyation. While funded organizations may engage in non-funded explicitly religious activities(e.g.,prayer),they must hold them separately from the activities funded by the DOJ,and recipients cannot compel beneficiaries to participate in them. The regulation also makes clear that organizations participating in progrwns funded by the DOJ are not permitted to discriminate in the provision of services on the basis of s beneficiary-.religion,religious belief,a refusal to hold a religious belief,or a refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice. Funded faith-based organizations must also provide written notice to beneficiaries,advising them that if they should object to the religious character of the funded faith based organization,the Cunded faith-based organization will take reasonable steps to refer the beneficiary to an alternative service provider. For more information on the regulation,please see the OCR's website at https://ojp.govlabour/ocr/parinerships.htin, SAAB and faith-based organizations should also note that the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act(Safe Streets Act)of 1968,as amended,34 U.S.C.§10228(c);the Victims of Crime Act of 1984,as amended,34 U.S.C.§20110(e);the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974,as amended,34 U.S.C.§11182(b);and VAWA,as amended, 34 U.S.C.§ 12291(b)(13),contain prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of religion in employment. Despite these nondiscrimination provisions,Ire DOJ has concluded that it may construe the Religious Freedom Restoration Act(RFRA)on a case-by- case basis to permit some faith-based organizations to receive DOJ funds while taking into account religion when hiring staff,even if the statute that authorizes the funding program generally forbids recipients from considering religion in employment decisions, Please consult with the OCR if you have any questions about the regulation or the application of RFRA to the statutes that prohibit discrimination in employment. Using Arrest and Conviction Records in Making Employment Decisions The OCR issucd an advisory document for recipients on the proper use of arrest and conviction records in making hiring decisions. See Advisory for Recipients of Financial Assistance from the U.S.Department of Justice on the U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Enforcement Guidance:Consideration ofArrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title V11 of the Civil Rights Act of 1969(lune 2013),available at https•J/ojp.gov/about/ocr/pdfs/UscofConviction_Advisory.pdf. Recipients should be mindful that the misuse of arrest or conviction records to screen either applicants for employment or employees for retention or promotion may have a disparate impact based on race or national origin,resulting in unlawful employment discrimination. In light of the Advisory, recipients should consult local counsel in reviewing their employment practices. If warranted,recipients should also incorporate an analysis of the use of arrest and conviction records in their Fqual Employment Opportunity Plans(EFOPs)(see below). Complying with the Safe Streets Act An organization that is a recipient of financial assistance subject to the nondiscrimination provisions of the Safe Streets Act,must meet two obligations:(1)complying with the federal regulation pertaining to the development of an EEOP(see 28 C.F.R.pt.42,subpt.E)and(2) submitting to the OCR findings of discrimination(see 28 C.F.R.§F 42.204(c),.205(c)(5)). Meeting the EEOP Requirement An ESOP is a comprehensive document that analyzes a recipient's relevant labor market data,as well as the recipient's employment practices,to identify possible barriers to the participation of women and minorities in all levels of a recipient's workforce. As a recipient of DO]funding,you may be required to submit an EEOP Certification Report or an EEOP Utilization Report to the OCR. For more information on whether your organization is subject to the EEOP requirements,see https://ojp.gov/about/ocr/eeop.htni. Additionally,you may request technical assistance from an EEOP specialist at the OCR by telephone at(202)616-1771 or by e-mail at EEOPforms@usdoj.gov. Meeting the Requirement to Submit Findings of Discriminatiou If in the three years prior to the date of the grant award,your organization has received an adverse finding of discrimination based on race, color,national origin,religion,or sex,after a due-process hearing,from a state or federal court or from a state or federal administrative agency,your organization must send a copy of the finding to the OCR. Ensuring the Compliance of Suhrecipients SAAB must have standard assurances to notify subrecipients of their civil rights obligations,written procedures to address discrimination complaints filed against subreeipient_c,methods to monitor subrecipients'compliance with civil rights requirements,and a program to train subrecipients on applicable civil rights laws. In addition,SAAB must submit to the OCR every three years written Methods of Administration(MOA)that summarize the policies and procedures that they have implemented to ensure the civil rights compliance of subrecipients. For more information on the MOA requirement,see https://ojp.gov/funding/ExplorelStateMethodsAdniin-FY2017update.htrn. If the OCR can assist you in any way in fulfilling your organization's civil rights responsibilities as a recipient of federal financial assistance,please contact us. Sincerely, a. A&A--- Michael L.Alston Director cc: Grant Manager Financial Analyst U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs *_ PAGE 1 OF 21 Bureau of Justice Assistance Grant I _ 1 1.RECIPIENT NAME AND ADDRESS(including Zip Code) 4.AWARD NUMBER: 2017-D1-BX-0496 City of Scaulc 700 Sth Avenue,Suile 5800 5.PROJECT PERIOD:FROM 101012016 TO 09/302020 Scatdo,WA 98124-4708 BUDGET PERIOD:FROM 10/012016 TO 09!302020 6..AWARD DATE 10/102018 7.ACTION 2a.GRANTEE IRSIVENDOR NO. 8.SUPPLEMENT NUMBER Initial 916001303 00 2b.GRANTEE DUNS NO. — 790597814 9.PREVIOUS A-l'ARD AMOUNT S0 3.PROJECT TITLE 10.AMOUNT OF THIS AWARD $657,975 FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance(JAG)Grant _ Formula Program 11.TOTAL AWARD 4 657,975 12.SPECIAL CONDITIONS THE ABOVE GRANT PROJECT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO SUCH CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS AS ARE SET FORTH ON THE ATTACHED PAGE(S). U.STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR GRANT This project is suppmcd under FY I-tbJA-JAG State and JAG Locol)Title I o1 Pub.L.Nn.90-351(gcntrally codified at 42 U.S.0 3711•3797ff•5), islcludmV subpart 1 of pan E(codifw°d s(42 U.S.C.3750-3758);see also 28 U.S.C.53DC(a). 14.CATALOG OF DOMESTIC FEDERAL ASSISTANCE(CFDA Number) - 16.73R-Eduard Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Prugram 15,METHOD OF PAYMENT GPRS AGENCY APPROVAL —��— GRANTEE ACCEPTANCEx_ _ 16.TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL 19.TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GRANTEE OFFICIAL Man.Dummennuth Rd: JAALCII-I Mayor „,///Prixipal Deputy AssistantAuomcy Grncral initial 17 SIGNATURE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL 19.51GNA-TT.F R FC•fPIENT OMCIAL 19A.DATE AGENCY USE ONLY 20.ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION CODES 21. SDJUGT0007 FISCAL FUND BUD. DIV. YEAR CODE ACT. OFC. REG. SUB. PDMS AMOUNT X B DJ 80 00 DD 657975 OJP FORM 40002(REV.5-87)PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. initis `Acceptance of Byme-JAG 2017 funds by Plaintiffs New York,Connecticut,New Jersey, Rhode Island, Washington,and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia—and by the political subdivisions of OJP FORM 411D02(REV.4-89) Plaintiff states—shall not be construed as acceptance of Special Conditions¶¶52-56.Nor shall these conditions be enforced against these grantees given Judge Ramos's ruling in New York et at.. v. U.S. Department of Justice et a1., 18 Civ 6471 (ER)(ECF 114 and 122)(S.D N.Y)where these disputed conditions were enjoined for the reasons stated therein,including that 8 U.S.C. § 1373 was initial unconstitutional and not within the purview of"all applicable laws”as referenced in 34 U S.C.§10153(a) U.S,Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 2 OF 21 Grant I PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0476 AWARD DATE 10/10/2018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Requirements of the award;remedies for non-compliance or for materially false statements The conditions of this award are material requirements of the award. Compliance with any certifications or assurances submitted by or on behalf of the recipient that relate to conduct during the period of performance also is a material requirement of this award. Failure to comply with any one or more of these award requirements--whether a condition set out in full below,a condition incorporated by reference below,or a certification or assurance related to conduct during the award period— may result in the Office of Justice Programs("OJP")taking appropriate action with respect to the recipient and the award. Among other things,the OJP may withhold award funds,disallow costs,or suspend or terminate the award. The Department of Justice("DOJ"),including OJP,also may take other legal action as appropriate. Any materially false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement to the federal government related to this award(or concealment or omission of a material fact)may be the subject of criminal prosecution(including under 18 U.S.C.1001 and/or 1621, and/or 42 U.S.C.3795a),and also may lead to imposition of civil penalties and administrative remedies for false claims or otherwise(including under 31 U.S.C.3729-3730 and 3801-3812). i Should any provision of a requirement of this award be held to be invalid or unenforceable by its term:,that provision shall first be.applied with a limited construction so as to give it the maximum effect permitted by law. Should it be held,instead,that the provision is utterly invalid or-unenforceable,such provision shall be deemed severable from this award. 2. Applicability of Part 200 Uniform Requirements The Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements in 2 C.F.R.Part 200,as adopted and supplemented by DOJ in 2 C.F.R.Part 2800(together,the"Part 200 Uniform Requirements")apply to this FY 2017 award from OJP. The Part 200 Uniform Requirements were first adopted by DOJ on December 26,2014. If this FY 2017 award supplements funds previously awarded by OJP under the same award number(e.g.,funds awarded during or before December 2014),the Part 200 Uniform Requirements apply with respect to all funds under that award number (regardless of the award date,and regardless of whether derived from the initial award or a supplemental award)that are obligated on or after the acceptance date of this FY 2017 award. For more information and resources on the Part 200 Uniform Requirements as they relate to OJP awards and subawards ("subgrants"),see the OJP website al haps:/lojp.gov/fending/Part2OOUniformRequirements.htm. P In the event that an award-related question arises from documents or other materials prepared or distributed by OJP that may appear to conflict with,or differ in some way from,the provisions of the Part 200 uniform Requirements,the recipient is to contact OJP promptly for clarification_ 3. Compliance with DOJ Grants Financial Guide The recipient agrees to comply with the DOJ Grants Financial Guide as posted on the OJP website(currently,the"2015 DOJ Grants Financial Guide"available at https://ojp.gov/fininciaiguideADOJ/index.huii),including any updated version that may be posted during the period of performance. i initial OJP FORM 4000`'(REV.4-98) U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 3 OF 21 ti Grant i i PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 1011012019 I_ SPECIAL CONDITIONS 4, Required training for Point of Contact and all Financial Points of Contact Both the Point of Contact(POC)and all Financial Point,of Contact(FPOCs)for this award must have successfully completed an"OJP financial management and grant administration training"by 120 days after the date of the recipient's acceptance of the award. Successful completion of such a training on or after January 1,2016,will satisfy this condition. In the event that either the POC or an FPOC for this award changes during the period of performance,the new POC or FPOC must have successfully completed an"OJP financial management and grant administration training"by 120 calendar days after--(1)the date of OJP's approval of the"Change Grantee Contact"GAN(in the case of a new POC),or(2)the date the POC enters information on the new FPOC in GMS(in the case of a new FPOC). Successful completion of such a training on or after January 1,2016,will satisfy this condition. A list of OJP trainings that OJP will consider"OJP financial management and grant administration training"for purposes of this condition is available at htips://www.ojp.goN,/training/fTnts.htm. All trainings that satisfy this condition include a session on grant fraud prevention and detection. The recipient should anticipate that OJP will immediately withhold("freeze")award funds if the recipient fails to comply with this condition. The recipient's failure to comply also may lead OJP to impose additional appropriate conditions on this award. 5. Requirements related to"de minimis"indirect cost rate A recipient that is eligible under the Part 200 Uniform Requirements and other applicable law to use the"de minimis" indirect cost rate described in 2 C.F.R.200.414(f),and that elects to use the"de minimis"indirect cost rate.must advise OJP in writing of both its eligibility and its election,and must comply with all associated requirements in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements. The"de minimis"rate may be applied only to modified total direct costs(MTDC)as defined by the Part 200 Uniform Requirements. 6. Requirement to report potentially duplicative funding If the recipient currently has other active awards of federal funds,or if the tecipient receives any other award of federal funds during the period of performance for this award,the recipient promptly must determine whether funds from any of those other federal awards have been,are being,or are to be used(in whole or in part)for one or more of the identical cost items for which funds are provided under this award. If so,the recipient must promptly notify the DOJ awarding agency(OJP or O V W,as appropriate)in writing of the potential duplication,and,if so requested by the DOJ awarding agency,must seek a budget-modification or change-of-project-scope grant adjustment notice(GAN)to eliminate any inappropriate duplication of funding. rte" 111Jt1a1 OJP FORM 400012(REV.4-SS) " U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 4 OF 21 Grant PROSECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-nX-0476 AWARD DATE 10110/2018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 7. Requirements related to System for Award Management and Universal Identifier Requirements The recipient must comply with applicable requirements regarding the System for Award Management(SAKI), currently accessible at hitps:/Iwv.,wstim.gov/. This includes applicable requirements regarding registration with SAM, as well as maintaining the currency of information in SAM. The recipient also must comply with applicable restrictions on subawards("subgrants")to first-tier subrecipient& (first-tier"subgrantees"),including restrictions on subawards to entities that do not acquire and provide(to the recipient)the unique entity identifier required for SAM registration. The details of the recipient's obligations related to SAM and to unique entity identifiers are posted on the OJP web site at https://ojp.goy/funding/Explore/SAM.him(Award condition: System for Award Management(SAM)and Universal Identifier Requirements),and are incorporated by reference here. This condition does not apply to an award to an individual who received the award as a natural person(i.e.,unrelated to any business or non-profit organization that he or she may own or operate in his or her name). 8. All subawards("subgrants")must have specific federal authorization The recipient,and any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,must comply with all applicable requirements for authorization of any subaward. This condition applies to agreements that--for purposes of federal grants administrative requirements--DIP considers a"subaward"(and therefore does not consider a procurement "contract"). The details of the requirement for authorization of any subaward are posted on the OJP web site at https:/Iojp.gov/funding/Explore/SubawardAutliorization.htm(Award condition: All subawards("subgrants")must have specific federal authorization),and are incorporated by reference here. 9. Specific post-award approval required to use a noncompetitive approach in any procurement contract that would exceed$150,000 The recipient,and any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,must comply-with all applicable requirements to obtain specific advance approval to use a noncompetitive approach in any procurement contract that would exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold(currently,$150,000). This condition applies to agreements that--for purposes of federal grants administrative requirements—OJP considers a procurement"contract"(and therefore does not consider a subaward). The details of the requirement for advance approval to use a noncompetitive approach in a procurement contract under an OJP award are posted on the OJP web site at https:Hojp.gov/funding/£xplore/NoncoLnputitiveProcuremtnt.htni (Award condition: Specific post-award approval required to use a noncompetitive approach in a procurement contract (if contract would exceed Sl 50,000)),and are incorporated by reference here. 1Tflt1al OSP FORM 4000/2(REV.4-88) ); U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 5 OF 21 Grant i PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-B%-0496 AWARD DATE 10/10/2018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS j 10. Requirements pertaining to prohibited conduct related to trafficking in persons(including reporting requirements and OJP authority to terminate award) The recipient,and any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,must comply with all applicable requirements(including requirements to report allegations)pertaining to prohibited conduct related to the trafficking of persons,whether on flit par of recipients,subiecipiems("subgrantees"),or individuals deiiuu3(for purposes ofthis cor,ddior.)as"empicyse ' of the recipient or of any subrecipient. I The details of the recipient's obligations related to prohibited conduct related to trafficking in persons are posted on the OJP web site at httpsJ/ojp.gov/funding/Explore/ProliibitedConduct-Trafficking.litrr (Award condition: Prohibited conduct by recipients and subrecipients related to trafftckrug in persons(including reporting requirements and OJP authority to terminate av ard)),and are incorporntcd by reference here. I 11. Compliance with applicable rules regarding approval,planning,and reporting of conferences,meetings,trainings,and other events The recipient,and any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,must comply with all applicable laws,regulations, polictCti,and official DOJ guidance(including Specific Cost Imus,prl0r approval and reporting renU3rC[rlCntti,Where applicable)govemtng the use of federal funds for e.xpcnses related to conferences(as that term is d_fincd by DO)). it.cluding the provision of food and/or beverages at such confcrences,and costs of aftead.tnce at Such confc3 cotes. Information on the pertinent DOJ definition of conferences and the rules applicable to this award appears in the DOJ Grants Financial Guide(currently,as section 3.10 of"Postaward Requirements"in the"2015 DOJ Grants Financial Guide"). 12. Requirement for data on performance and effectiveness under the award The recipient must collect and maintain dew that measure the perfonmanke and effectiveness of%Mork under this a:vard. The data matt be provided to OJP in the manner(including a ithin the timelrantes)spet:if ud by OJP in the prn&rain solicitation or other applicable written guidance. Data collection suppor'.s compliance with the Guvviianctu Performance and Results Act(GPRA)and the GPM.Modernization Act of 2010,and other applicable laws. 13. OJP Training Guiding Principles Any training or training materials that the recipient--or any subrecipient("subgrant"")at any tier--develops or delivers with OJP award funds must adhere to the OJP Training Guiding Principles for Grantees and Subgrantees, available at https://ojp.gov/funding/ojptrainingguidingprinciples.htm. I 14. Effect of failure to address audit issues The recipient understands and agrccs That the DOJ awarding agency(OJP or OV\V,as appropriate)may withhold award tends,or may impose other related requirements,if(as determined by the DOJ awarding agency)the recipient does not satisfactorily and promptly address outstanding issues from audits required by the Part 200 uniform Requirements(or by the terms of this award),or other outstanding issues that arise in connection with audits, investigations,or reviews of DOJ awards. 15. Potential imposition of additional requirements T1rc recipient agrees to comply with anYadditioml requirements that may be imposed by the DOJ uwardin+agency 1 (OJP or OV W,as appropriate)during the period of perfermanre for this award.if the recipient is dcAgnated as"hip b- risk"for purposes of the DOJ high-risk grantee hst. MAW DJP FORM 400!V2(REV.4-88) "- U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION E Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PACE c of 21 Grant PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 101101'2019 SPECIAL CONDITIONS lb. Compliance with DOJ regulations pertaining to civil rights and nondiscrimination-28 C.F.R.Part 42 The recipient,and any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,must comply with all applicable requirements of 28 C.F.R.Part 42,specifically including any applicable requirements in Subpart E of 28 C.F.R.Part 42 that relate to an equal employment opportunity program. 17. Compliance with DOJ regulations pertaining to civil rights and nondiscrimination-28 C.F.R.Pan 54 The recipient,and any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,must comply with all applicable requirements of 28 C.F.R.Part 54,which re)ates to nondiscrimination on the basis of sex in certain"education programs." 18. Compliance with DOJ regulations pertaining to civil rights and nondiscrimination•28 C.F.R.Pan 38 The recipient,and any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,must comply with all applicable requirements of 28 C.F.R.Part 38,specifically including any applicable requirements regarding written notice to program beneficiaries and prospective program beneficiaries. Part 38 of 28 C.F.R.,a DOJ regulation,was amended effective May 4,2016. Among other things,28 C.F.R.Part 38 includes rules that prohibit specific ferns of discrimination on the basis of religion,a religious belief,a refusal to hold a religious belief,or refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice. Part 38 also sets out rules and requirements that pertain to recipient and subrecipient("subgrantee")organizations that engage in or conduct explicitly religious activities,as well as rules and requirements that pertain to recipients and subreeipients that are faith-based or religious organizations. The text of the regulation,now entitled"Partnerships with Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood Organizations,"is available via the Electronic Cade of Federal Regulations(currently accessible at https://w,),,nv.ecfr.gov/cgi- bin/ECFR?page=browse),by browsing to Title 28-Judicial Administration,Chapter 1,Part 38,under a-CFR"current" data. 19. Restrictions on"lobbying" In general,as a matter of federal law,federal funds awarded by OJP may not be used by the recipient,or any subrecipient("subgrantee")at any tier,either directly or indirectly,to support or oppose the enactment,repeal, modification,or adoption of any law,regulation,or policy,at any level of government. See 18 U.S.C. 1913. (There may be exceptions if an applicable federal statute specifically authorizes certain activities that otherwise would be barred by law" Another federal law generally prohibits federal funds awarded by OJP from being used by the recipient,or any subrecipient at any tier,to pay any person to influence(or attempt to influence)a federal agency,a Member of Congress,or Congress(or an official or employee of any of them)with respect to the awarding of a federal grant or cooperative agreement,subgrant,contract,subcontract,or loan,or with respect to actions such as renewing,extending, or modifying any suet.award. See 31 U.S.C. 1352. Certain exceptions to this law apply,including an exception that applies to Indian tribes and tribal organizations. Should any question arise as to whether a particular use of federal funds by a recipient(or subrecipient)would or might fall within the scope of these prohibitions,the recipient is to contact OJP for guidance,and may not proceed without the express prior written approval of OJP. initial OJP FORM 4000/2(REQ'.4-58) U.S.Department of Justice I Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION zi � Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 7 of 21 Grant PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/70/2018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 20. Compliance with general appropriations-law restrictions on the use of federal funds(FY 2017) The recipient,and any subrecipient t"sub&rantee")at any tier,must comply with all applicable restrictions on the use of federal funds set out in federal appropriations,AAutes. Pertinent restrictions,including from various"general provisions"in the Consolidated Appropriations Act,2017,are set out at haps://oip.gov/funding/Explore/FY17AppropriationsRestrictionc.htm,and are incorporated by reference here. Should a question arise as to whether a particular use of federal funds by a recipient(or a subrecipient)would or might fall within the scope of an appropriations-law r'csiriction,the recipient is to contact OR for guidance,and may not proceed without the express prior written approval of OJP. 21 Reporting Potential Fraud,Waste,and Abuse,and Similar Misconduct The recipient and any subrecipients("subgrantees")must promptly refer to the DOJ Office of the Inspcetor General (01G)any credible evidence that a principal,emp(oyee,agent,sabrecipient,contractor,subcontractor,or other person has,in connection with funds under this award--{1)submitted a claim that violates the False Claims Act;or(2) committed a criminal or civil violation of laws pertaining to fraud,conflict of interest,bribery,gtatuir.,or similar misconduct. Potential fraud,waste,abuse,or misconduct involving or relating to funds under this award should be reported to the OIG by—(1)mail directed to:Office of the Ingactor General,U.S.Department of Justice,Investigations Division, 1425 New York Avenw-N.1k,Suite 7100,Washington,DC 20530;and/or(2)the DOJ DIG hotline:(contact information in English and Spanish)at(800)869-4499(phone)or(202)616-9881(fax). Additional information is available from the DOJ OIG website at htips://oig.justice.gov/hotline. i initial OJP FORM 40002(REV.4-t:8) U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PACE S OF 21 .� r Grant PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-04916 AWARD DATE 1011012018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 22. Restrictions and certifications regarding non-disclosure agreements and related matters No recipient or subrecipient("subgrantee")under this award,or entity that receives a procurement contract or subcontract with any funds under this award,may require any employee or contractor to sign an internal confidentiality agreement or statement that prohibits or otherwise restricts,or purports to prohibit or restrict,the reporting(in accordance with law)of waste,fraud,or abuse to an investigative or law enforcement representative of a federal department or agency authorized to receive such information. The foregoing is not intended,and shall not be understood by the agency making this award,to contravene requirements applicable to Standard Form 312(which relates to classified information),Form 4414(which relates to sensitive compartmented information),or any other form issued by a federal department or agency governing the nondisclosure of classified information. 1. In accepting this award,the recipient-- a. represents that it neither requires nor has required intemal confidentiality agreements or statements from employees or contractors that currently prohibit or otherwise currently restrict(or purport to prohibit or restrict)employces or contractors from reporting waste,fraud,or abuse as described above;and b. certifies that,if it learns or is notified that it is or has been requiring its employees or contractors to execute agreements or statements that prohibit or otherwise restrict(or purport to prohibit or restrict),reporting of waste,fraud, or abuse as described above,it will immediately stop any further obligations of award funds,will provide prompt written notification to the federal agency making this award,and will resume(or permit resumption of)such obligations only if expressly authorized to do so by that agency. 2. If the recipient does or is authorized under this award to make subawards("subgrants'),procurement contracts,or both-- a. it represent.-that— (1) it has determined that no other entity that the recipient's application proposes may or will receive award funds (whether through a subaward("subgrant"),procurement contract,or subcontract under a procurement contract)either requires or has required internal confidentiality agreements or statements from employees or contractors that currently prohibit or otherwise currently restrict(or purport to prohibit or restrict)employees or contractors from reporting waste, fraud,or abuse as described above;and (2) it has made appropriate inquiry,or otherwise has an adequate factual basis,to support this representation;and b. it certifies that,if it learns or is notified that any subrecipient,contractor,or subcontractor entity that receives funds under this award is or has been requiring its employees or contractors to execute agreements or statements that prohibit or otherwise restrict(or purport to prohibit or restrict),reporting of waste,fraud,or abuse as described above,it will immediately stop any further obligations of award funds to or by that entity,will provide prompt written notification to the federal agency making this award,and will resume(or permit resumption of)such obligations only if expressly authorized to do so by that agency. initial OJP FORM 40002(REV.4-99) U.S,Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE9 OF 21 Grant PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-D496 AWARD DATE 101102DIH SPECIAL CONDITIONS 23. Compliance with 41 U.S.C.4712(including prohibitions on reprisal;notice to employees) I The recipient(and any subrecipient at any tier)must comply with,and is subject to,all applicable provisions of 41 U.S.C.4712,including all applicable provisions that prohibit,under specified circumstances,discrimination against an employee as reprisal for the employee's disclosure of information related to gross mismanagement of a federal grant,a gross waste of federal funds,an abuse of authority relating to a federal grant,a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety,or a violation of law,rule,or regulation related to a federal grant. The recipient also must inform its employees,in writing(and in the predominant native language of the workforce),of employee rights and remedies under 41 U.S.C.4712. Should a question arise as to the applicability of the provisions of 41 U.S.C.4712 to this award,the recipient is to contact the DOJ awarding agency(OJP or OVW,as appropriate)for guidance. 24. Encouragement of policies to ban text messaging while driving Pursuant to Executive Order 13513,"Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving,"74 Fed.Reg. 51225(October 1,2009),DOI encourages recipients and subrecipients("subgmnlees")to adopt and enforce policies banning employees from text messaging while driving any vehicle during the course of performing work funded by this award,and to establish workplace safety policies and conduct education,awareness,and other outreach to decrease crashes caused by distracted drivers. 25. Cooperating with OR Monitoring i The recipient agrees to cooperate with OR monitoring of this award pursuant to OJP's guidelines,protocols,and procedures,and to cooperate with OR(including the grant manager for this award and the Office of Chief Financial Officer(OCFO))requests related to such monitoring,including requests related to desk reviews and/or site visits. The recipient agrees to provide to OJP all documentation necessary for OJP to complete its monitoring tasks,including documentation related to any subawards made under this award. Further,the recipient agrees to abide by reasonable deadlines set by OJP for providing the requested documents. Failure to cooperate with OJP's monitoring activities may result in actions that affect the recipient's DOJ awards,including,but not limited to:withholdings and/or other restrictions on the recipient's access to award funds;referral to the DOJ OIG for audit review;designation of the recipient as a DO]High Risk grantee;or termination of an award(s). 26. FFATA reporting: Subawards and executive compensation The recipient must comply with applicable requirements to report first-tier subawards("subgrants")of$25,000 or more and,in certain circumstances,to report the names and total compensation of the five most highly compensated executives of the recipient and first-tier subrecipients(first-tier"subgrantees")of award funds. The details of recipient obligations,which derive from the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006(FFATA),are posted on the OJP web site at https://ojp.gov/funding/Explore/FFATA.htm(Award condition:Reporting Subawards and Executive Compensation),and are incorporated by reference here. This condition,including its reporting requirement,does not apply to—(1)an award of less than$25,000,or(2)an award made to an individual who received the award as a natural person(i.e.,unrelated to any business or non-profit organization that he or she may own or operate in his or her name). I I OJP FORM 4000/2(REV.4-88) initial �. U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 10 OF 21 ` I Grant PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/1012019 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 27. Use of program income Program income(as defined in the Part 200 Uniform Requirements)must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Part 200 Uniform Requirements. Program income earnings and expenditures both must be reported on the quarterly Federal Financial Report,SF 425. 28. Justice Information Sharing In order to promote information sharing and enable interoperability among disparate systems across the justice and public safety community,the recipient(and any subrecipient at any ticr) must cothply with DOTS Global Justice Infor-oration Sharing initiative(DOTs Global)guidelines and recommendations Ifir this pumcular award.The recipient shall conform to the Global Standards Package(GSP)and all constituent elcnlctns,where applicable,us described at: https:!!is.ojp.gov gsp_grantcondition.The recipient shall document planted approaches to information sharing itnd describe compliance to the GSP and appropriate privacy policy that protects shared information,or provide detailed justification for why an alternative approach is recommended. 29. Avoidance of duplication of networks To avoid duplicating existing networks or IT systems in any initiatives funded by i3JA for law enforcement infzrmation sharing systems which inrolve interstate cormcctivity botwcenjurisdictious.such systems shall employ,to the extent possible,existing networks as the communication backb.mc to achieve interstate connectivity,unless the recipient can demonstrme to the satisfaction of BJA that this requirement would not be cost effective or would impair the functionality of an existing or proposed IT system. 30. Compliance with 28 C.F.R.Part 23 With respect to any information technology system funded or supported by funds under this award,the recipient(and any subrecipient at any tier)must comply with 28 C.F.R.Part 23,Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies,if ON determines this regulation to be applicable.Should OJP determine 28 C.F.R.Part 23 to be applicable,OJP may,at its discretion,perform audits of the system,as per the regulation.Should any violation of 28 C.F.R.Part 23 occur,the recipient may be fined as per 42 U.S.C.3789g(c)-(d). The recipient may not satisfy such a tine with federal funds. 31. Protection of human research subjects The racipicnt l,utd:any:�ubracipient at any ticrl mint cornply with the requirements of 7-1iCF R.Part 46 uci nalt CJP policies and procedures regarding the protection of human research subiects,mcluding obtainment of Institutional R eview Board apprny3i,if approprime,and sllhiect informed cnnsenl. 32. Confidentiality of data The recipient(and any subrecipient at any tier)must comply with all confidentiality requirements of42 U.S.C.3789g and 28 C.F.R.Part 22 that are applicable to collection,use,and revelation of data or information.The recipient further agrees,as a condition of award approval,to submit a Privacy Certificate that is in accord with requirements of 23 C.F.R.Part 22 and,in particular,28 C.F.R.22.23. I OJP FORM 4000/2(REV.¢s9) initial F_ U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION t Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE a OF 21 Grant PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/10/2015 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 33. Verification and updating of recipient contact information The recipient must verify its Point of Contact(POC),Financial Point of Contact(FPOC),and Authorized Representative contact infomtaiion in GMS,including telephone number and e-mail address. If any information is incorrect or has changed,a Grant Adjustment Notice(GAN)must be submitted via the Grants Management System (GMS)to document changes. 34, Law enforcement task forces-required training Within 120 days of award acceptance,each current member of a law enforcement task force funded with award funds who is a task force commander,agency executive,task force officer,or other task force member of equivalent rank, must complete required online(intemet-based)task force training.Additionally,all future task force members must complete this training once during the period of performance for this award,or once every four years if multiple OJP awards include this requirement. The required training is available free of charge online through the BJA-funded Center for Task Force Integrity and Leadership(www.ctfli.org).111 training addresses task force effectiveness,as well as other key issues including privacy and civil liberties/rights,task force performance measurement,personnel selection,and task force oversight and accountability.If award funds are used to support a task force,the recipient must compile and maintain a task force personnel roster,along willr course completion certificates. Additional information regarding the training is available through BJA's web site and the Center for Task Force Integrity and Leadership(v.,ww.ctfli.org). 35. Required attendance at BJA-sponsored events i The recipient(and its subrecipienis at any tier)must participate in BJA-sponsored training events,technical assistance events,or conferences held by BJA or its designees,upon BJA's request. 36. Justification of consultant rete Approval of this award does not indicate approval of any consultant rate in excess of 5650 per day.A detailed justification must be submitted to and approved by the OJP program office prior to obligation or expenditure of such funds. OJP FORM 400012(REV.4-98) f initial U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PACE 12 OF 21 Grant i PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10110/2ols SPECIAL CONDITIONS 37. Compliance with National Environmental Policy Act and related statutes Upon request,the recipient land any subrecipient at any tier)must assist BJA in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA),the National historic Preservation Act,and other related federal environmental impact analyses requirements in the use of these award funds,either directly by the recipient or by a subrecipient. Accordingly,the recipient agrees to first determine if any of the following activities will be funded by the grant,prior to obligating funds for any of these purposes.If it is determined that any of the following activities will be funded by the award,the recipient agrees to contact BJA. The recipient understands that this condition applies to new activities as set out below,whether or not they are being specifically funded with these award funds.That is,as long as the activity is being conducted by the recipient,a subrecipient,or any third parry,and the activity needs to be undertaken in order to use these award funds,this condition must first be met.The activities covered by this condition are: a.New construction; b.Minor renovation or remodeling of a property located in an environmentally or historically sensitive area,including properties located within a 100-year flood plain,a wetland,or habitat for endangered species,or a property listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; c.A renovation,lease,or any proposed use of a building or facility that will either(a)result in a change in its basic prior use or(b)significantly change its size; d.Implementation of a ne'.r program invol•.ing Ute use of chemicals ether than chemicals that are(a)purchased as an incidental component of a funded activity and(b)traditionally used,for example,in office,household,recreational,or education environments;and e.Implementation of a program relating to clandestine methamphetamine laboratory operations,including the G identification,seizure,or closure of clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. The recipient understands and agrees that complying with NFPA may require the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement,as directed by BJA.The recipient further understands and agrees to the requirements for implementation of a Mitigation Plan,as detailed at https://bia.gov/Funding/nepa.html,for programs relating to methamphetamine laboratory operations. Application of This Condition to Recipient's L-xisting Pregrsm::or Activities: For any of the recipient's or its sutrrccipacnis'cxr nng programs or activities that v;ill be funded by these award funds,the recipient,upon specific request from BJA,agrees to cooperate wit 13JA in:my preparation by BJA ofa national orprogram environmental assessment of that funded program or activity. 39. Establishment of trust fund If award funds are being drawn down in advance,the recipient(or a subrecipient,with respect to a subawsird)is required to establish a trust fund account.jThe trust fund may or ra:ry not be an interest-bearing account.)The fund, including any interest,may not be used to pay debts or expenses incurred by other activities beyond the scope of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program(JAG).The recipient also agrees to obligate the award funds in the trust fund(including any interest earned)during the period of performance for the award and expend within 90 days thereafter.Any unobligated or unexpended funds,including interest earned,must be returned to OJP at the time of closeout OJP FORM 40)N2(REQ`.4-85) i ltlal U.S.Department of Justice . Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 13 OF 21 y' Grant I FROMCT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/IJQ1?19 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 39. Prohibition on use of award funds for match under BVP program C JAG funds may be used to purchase vests for an agency,but they may not be used as the 50%match for purposes of the DOJ Bulletproof Vest Partnership(BVP)program. l 40. Certification of body armor"mandatory wear"policies I � The recipient agrees to submit a signed certification that all law enforcement agencies receiving body armor purchased with funds from this award have a written"mandatory wear"policy in effect.The recipient must keep signed certifications on file for any subrecipientc Alarming to utilize funds from this award for ballistic-resistant and stab- resistant body armor purchases.This policy must be in place for at least all uniformed officers before any funds from this award may be used by an agency for body armor.There are no requirements regarding the nature of the policy other than it be a mandatory wear policy for all uniformed officers while on duty. 41. Body armor-compliance with NO standards Ballistic-resistant and stab-resistant body armor purchased with JAG award funds may be purchased at anv threat level,make or model,from any distributor or manufacturer,as long as the body armor has been tested and found to comply with applicable National institute of Justice ballistic or stab standards and is listed on the NIJ Compliant Body Armor Model List(htips:Hnij.gov/).In addition,ballistic-resistant and stab-resistant body armor purchased must be American-made.The latest NIJ standard information can be found here:haps://nij.govAopics/technology/body- armor/pages/safety-init iative.aspx. 42, Required monitoring of subawards The recipient must monitor subawards under this JAG award in accordance with all applicable statutes,regulations, award conditions,and the DOJ Grants Financial Guide,and must include the appiicable conditions of this award in any subaward.Among other things,the recipient is responsible for oversight of subrecipient spending and monitoring of specific outcomes and benefits attributable to use of award funds by subrecipients.The recipient agrees to submit,upon request,documentation of its policies and procedures for monitoring of subawards under this award. 43. Reporting requirements The recipient must submit quarterly Federal Financial Reports(SFA25)and semi-annual performance reports through OJP's GMS(https:Hgmnts.ojp.usd(Di.gov).Com%istent with 4,e Department's responsibilities under the Govt mmt Performance and Results Act(GPRA)and the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010,the recipient must provide data that measure the results of its work. The recipient must submit quarterly performance metrics reports through BJA's Performance Measurement Tool(PMT)website(av+w.bjaperformancetools.org).For more detailed information on reporting and other JAG requirements,refer to the JAG reporting requirements webpage.Failure to submit required JAG reports by established deadlines may result in the freezing of grant funds and future High Risk designation. 44. Required data on law enforcement agency training Any law enforcement agency receiving direct or sub-awarded funding from this JAG award must submit quarterly accountability metrics data related to training!hat officers have received on the use of force,racial and ethnic bias,de- escalation of conflict,and constructive engagement with the public. initial ON FORM 4000/2(REV.4-88) U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 14 OF 21 Grant PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX449(, AWARD DATE 10/102019 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 45. Prohibited Expenditures List Award funds may t,ot be used for items that are listed nn the Prohibited Expenditure List at the time of purchase or I including as the list tray be arnended from time to bine.The Prohibited Expenditure List may be accessed here:hitps://wvfw.bja.gowfundirg,'JAGContmllcdParchascL.isi.pdf 46. Controlled expenditures-prior written approval required Award funds may not be used for items that are listed on the Controlled Expenditure List at the time of purchase or acquisition,inclurlinr ag the list stay be amended from time to time,without explicit written prior approval from BJA. The Controlled Expenditure List,and instructions on how to request approval for purchase or acquisitions are set out at htips 1-,r•w,w,bja.govrfun dmg lAGContro11cdpurclas,List.pdf 47. Controlled expenditures-incident reporting if an agency uscs award funds to purchase or acquire any item on the Contrniled Expenditure List at the tumu of puret.ase or acquisition,including as the list maybe amended Rom time to time,the agency must collect and retain(for at least 3 years)ceratin information about the use of—(1)any fedcraily-acquired Controlled Equipment in the agency's inventory,and(2)any other controlled equipment in the sarne category as the federally-acquired controlled equipment in the agency's inventory,regardless of source-,and the agency must make that information available to BJA upon request.Details about whist information must be collected and retained are set out at https://oip.gov/docs.E- Equipment-WG-Final-Reporr.pdf. t 48. Sale of items on Controlled Expenditure List Notwithstanding the provision of the Part 200 Unifu=Requirements set out at 2 C.F.R.200.313,no equipment listed on the Controlled Expenditure List Thal is purchased with award funds may be transferred or sold to a third party, except as described below; a. Agencies may iransfer or sell any controlled equipment,except riot helmets and riot shields,to a Lia Enforcement Agency(LEP.)after obtaining prior written approval from BJA.As a condition of that approval,the acquiring LEA will be required to submit information and certifications to BJA as if it were requesting approval to use award funds for the initisl purchase of items on the Controlled Expenditure List. b. Agencies may not transfer or sell any riot helmets or riot shields purct:esed under this award. c. Agencies may not transfer or sell any Controlled Equipmew purchased under this award w non-LEAs,with the exception of ftxcd wing uncraft,tulaty wing aircraft,and commatid and control vehicles.Before any such tr=sfcr or sale is Finalized,the agency must obtain prior w:itten approval from BJA.All law enforearnent-related and other sensitive or potentially dangerous components,and all law enforcement insignias and identifying markings must be removed prior to transfer or sale. The recipient must notify BJA prior to the disposal of any items on the Controlled Expenditure List purchased with award funds,and must abide by any applicabie laws(including regulations)in such disposal, 49. Prohibited or controlled expenditures-Effect of failure to comply Failure to comply with an award condition related to prohibited or controlled expenditures may result in denial of any further approvals of controlled expenditures under this or other federal awards, 01 OJP FORM 40002(REV.4-a8) � initial I U.S.Department of Justice a Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 15 of 21 Grant PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/10(2018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 50. Controlled expenditures-Standards Consistent with recommendation 2.1 of Executive Order 13688,a law enforcement agency that acquires controlled equipment with award funds must adopt robust and specific written policies and protocols governing General Policing Standards and Specific Controlled Equipment Standards.General Policing Standards includes policies on(a) Community Policing;(b)Constitutional Policing;and(c)Community Input and Impact Considerations.Specific Controlled Equipment Standards includes policies specifically related to(a)Appropriate Use of Controlled Equipment; (b)Supervision of Use;(c)Effectiveness Evaluation;(d)Auditing and Accountability;and(e)Transparency and Notice Considerations.Upon OJP's request,the recipient must provide a copy of the General Policing Standards and Specific Controlled Equipment Standards,and any related policies and protocols. 51. Authorization to obligate(federal)award funds to reimburse certain project costs incurred on or after October 1,2016 The recipient may obligate(federal)award funds only after the recipient makes a valid acceptance of the award. As of the first day of die period of performance for the award(October 1,2016),however,the recipient may choose to incur project costs using non-federal funds,but any such project costs are incurred at the recipient's risk until,at a minimum--(1)the recipient makes a valid acceptance of the award,and(2)all applicable withholding conditions are removed by OR(via a Grant Adjustment Notice), (A withholding condition is a condition in the award document that precludes the recipient from obligating,expending,or drawing down all or a portion of the award funds until the condition is removed.) Except to the extent(if any)that an award condition expressly precludes reimbursement of project costs incurred"at- risk,"if and when the recipient makes a valid acceptance of this award and OR removes each applicable withholding condition through a Grant Adjustment Notice,the recipient is authorized to obligate(federal)award funds to reimburse itself for project costs incurred"at-risk"earlier during the period of performance(such as project costs incurred prior to award acceptance or prior to removal of an applicable withholding condition),provided that those project costs otherwise are allowable costs under the award. Nothing in this condition shall be understood to authorize the recipient(or any subrecipient at any tier)to use award funds to"supplant"Slate or local funds in violation ofthe recipient's certification(executed by the chief executive of _ the State or local government)that federal funds will be used to increase the amounts of such funds that would,in the absence of federal funds,be made available for law enforcement activities. 52. "Certification of Compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373"required for valid award acceptance by a unit of local government In order validly to accept this award,the applicant Iota]gorerrunrm moat submit rho rNulred"Celtlfletl[IOI7 Of Compliance with 8 U.S.C.1373'(executed by the chief legal officer of the local government). Unless that executed initial certification either--(I)is submitted to OR together with the fully-executed award document,or(2)is uploaded in OJP's GMS no later than the day the signed award document is submitted to OJP,any submission by a unit of local government that purports to accept the award is invalid. If an initial award-acceptance submission by the recipient is invalid,once the unit of local government does submit the necessary certification regarding 8 U.S.C. 1373,it may submit a fully-executed award document executed by the unit of local government on or after the date of that certification. For purposes of this condition,"local government"docs not include any Indian tribes. I i OJP FORM 40DO2(REN'.4-88) 'Acceptance of Byme-JAG 2017 funds by Plaintiffs New York,Connecticut,New Jersey;Rhode Island, Washington,and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia—and by the political subdivisions of *, Plaintiff states—shall not be construed as acceptance of Special Conditions¶¶52-56_Nor shall these f /f conditions be enforced against these grantees given Judge Ramos's ruling in New Yor1 et al.,v.U.S. l Department of Justice et al., 18 Civ 6471 (ER)(ECF 114 and 122)(S.D.N.Y.)where these disputed candV— were enjoined for the reasons stated therein,including that 8 U.S.C. §1373 was unconstitutional and not initial within the purview of`all applicable laws'as referenced in 34 U.S.0 §10153(a). U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 16 OF 21 + Grant PRoJEcrWUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/10/2019 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 53. Ongoing compliance with 8 U.S.C.1373 is required 1.With respect to the"program or activity"funded in whole or part under this award(including any such"program or activity"of any subrecipient a1 any tier),throughout the period of performance for the award,no State or local government entity,-agency,or-official may prohibit or in any way restrict--(1)any govertunent entity or-official J from sending or receiving information regarding citizenship or immigration status as described in 8 U.S.C. 1373(a);or initial (2)a government entity or-agency from sending,requesting or receiving,maintaining,or exchanging information regarding immigration status as described in 8 U.S.C. 1373(b). For purposes of this award,any prohibition(or restriction)that violates this condition is an"information-communication restriction." 2.Certifications from subrecipients. The recipient may not make a subaward to a State or local government or a "public"institution of higher education,unless it first obtains a certification of compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373,properly executed by the chief legal officer of the jurisdiction or institution that would receive the subaward,using the appropriate form available at https://ojp.gov/funding/Explore/SarnpleCertifications-8USC1373.h(m. Similarly,the recipient must require that no subrecipient(at any tier)may make a further subaward to a State or local government or a "public"institution of higher education,utiles it first obtains a certification of compliance with 8 U.S.C.1373.properly executed by the chief legal officer of the Jurisdiction or institution that would receive the further subaward,using the appropriate OJP form. 3.The recipient's monitoring responsibilities include monitoring of subrecipient compliance with the requirements of this condition- 4.Allowable costs. Compliance with these requirements is an authorized and priority purpose of this award. To the extent that such costs are not reimbursed under any other federal program,award funds may be obligated(including for authorized reimbursements)for the reasonable,necessary,and allocable costs(if any)that the recipient,or any subrecipient at any tier that is a State or local government or a"public"institution of higher education,incurs to implement this condition. 5.Rules of Construction A.For purposes of this condition: (1)"State"and"local government"include any agency or oilier entity thereof,but not any institution of higher education or any Indian tribe. (2)A"public"institution of higher education is one that is owned,controlled,or directly funded by a State or local government. (3)"Program or activity"means what it means under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964(see 42 U.S.C.2000d-4a). (4)"Immigration status"means what it means for purposes of 8 U.S.C.1373(Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996);and terms that are defined in 8 U.S.C.1101 (immigration and Nationalitv Act) mean what they mean under that section 1101,except that the term"State"also shall include American Samoa(cf.42 U.S.C.901(x)(2)). (5)pursuant to the provisions set out at(or returenced in)8 U.S.C. 1551 note("Abolition ..and Tr:msfer of Functions"1,references to flue"hnntigration and Naturalization Service"in S LIS C. 1373 are to oc read as references to particular components of the Department of Homeland Security(DHS). B.Nothing in this condition shall be understood to authorize or require any recipient,any subrecipient at any tier,any State or local government,any"public"institution of higher education,or any other entity(or individual)to violate any federal law,including any applicable civil rights or nondiscrimination law. -Acceptance of Byrne-JAG 2017 funds b Plaintiffs New York. Connecticut,New jersey,Rhode Island, orP ForzM a000n(REV.a•ssl p Y Y Y� Washington,and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia—and by the political subdivisions of Ainitial Plaintiff states—shalt not be construed as acceptance of Special Conditions IM52-56.Nor shall these ` conditions be enforced against these grantees given Judge Ramos's ruling in New York of al., v. U.S. Department of Justice of at., 18 Civ. 6471 (ER) (ECF 114 and 122)(S.D.N.Y)where these disputed conditions were enjoined for the reasons stated therein,including that 8 U.S.C.§ 1373 was unconstitutional and not within the purview of`all applicable laws' as referenced in 34 U.S.C.§10153(a) U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION .+ Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PACE n OF 21 " Grant 4 I �I PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/1012016 SPECIAL CONDITIOR'S IMPORTANT NOTE: Any questions about the meaning or scope of this condition should be directed to OJP,before award acceptance. j54. Authority to obligate award funds contingent on compliance with 8 U.S,C.1373;unallowable costs;obligation to notify 1. If the recipient is a State or local government— A. The recipient may not obligate award funds if,at the time of the obligation,the"program or activity"of the initial recipient(or of any subrecipient at any tier that is a either a State or unit of local government or a"public"institution of higher education)that is funded in whole or in part with award funds is subject to any"infomtation-communication restriction." B. In addition,with respect to any project costs it incurs"at risk,"the recipient may not obligate award funds to reimburse itself if--at the time it incurs such costs—the"program or activity"of the recipient(or of any subrecipient at any tier that is a either a State or unit of local government or a"public"institution of higher education) that would be reimbursed in whole or in part with award funds was subject to any"information-communication resttiction." C. Any drawdown of award funds by the recipient shall be considered,for all purposes,to be a material representation by the recipient to OJP that,as of the date the recipient requests the drawdown,the recipient and all subrecipient, (regardless oftier)are in compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373. D. The recipient must promptly notify OR(in writing)if the recipient,from its requisite monitoring of compliance with award conditions or otherwise,has credible evidence that indicates that the funded"program or activity"of the recipient,or of any subrecipient at any tier that is either a State or a local government or a"public"institution of higher education,may be subject to any"information-communication restriction."In addition,any subaward(at any tier)to a subrecipient that is either a State or a local government or a"public"institution of higher education must require prompt notification to the entity that made the subaward,should the subrecipient such credible evidence regarding an "information-communication restriction." 2. Any subaward(at any tier)to a subrecipient that is either a State or a local government or a"public"institution of i higher education must provide that the subrecipient may not obligate award funds if,at the time of the obligation,the "program or activity"of the subrecipient(or of any further such subrecipient at any tier)that is funded in whole or in part with award funds is subject to any"information-communication restriction." 3. Abscxrt au axprcas written detcrrninatien try DOJ to the contrary,based upon a finding by DO]of cornpelhnu circumstances(e.g.,a small amount of award funds obligated by the recipient at the time of a subrecipicnt's tumor and transitory non-compliance,which was unknown to the recipient despite diligent monitoring),any obligations of award funds that,under this condition,may not be made shall be unallowable costs for purposes of this award. In making any such determination,DOJ will give great weight to evidence submitted by the recipient that demonstrates diligent monitoring of subrecipient compliance with the requirements set out in the award condition entitled"Ongoing compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373 is required." 4. Rules of Construction A. For purposes of this condition"information-communication restriction"has the meaning set out in the award condition entitled"Ongoing compliance with 8 U.S.C, 1373 is required." B. Both the"Rules of Construction"and the"Important Note"set out in the award condition entitled"Ongoing r i compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373 is required"are incorporated by reference as though set forth here in full. it initial OJP FORM 4000/2(REV.4-88)'Ac"eptance of Byrne-JAG 2017 funds o; Plaintiffs New' on: Connecticut,New Jersey. Rhode Island,Washington, and the Commonwealths of Massac. tusetts and Virginia—and by the political subdlvisicrs of Plaintiff states—shall not be construed as acceptance of Special Conditions¶¶52-56 Nor shall these conditions be enforced against these grantees given Judge Ramos's ruling in New York et al., v. U S.Department of Justice et al., 18 Civ.5471 (ER)(ECF 114 and 122)(S.D.N.Y.)where these disputed conditions were enjoined for the reasons stated therein,including that 8 U-S.C. § 1373 was unconstitutional and not within the purview of"all applicable laws"as referenced in 34 U.S.C. § 10153(x). - U.S.Deportment of Justice ! Office of justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE IS OF 21 Grant PROJECT NUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/10/2018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 55. Required State-level rules or practices related to aliens;allowable costs The following provisions apply to the recipient of this award,if the recipient is a State government,and also apply to ial any State-government subrecipient at any tier(whether or not the recipient is a State government). 1.Requirementss With respect to the"program or activity"that is funded(in whole or in part)by this award,as of the date the recipient accepts this award,and throughout the remainder of the period of performance for the award-- A.A State statute,or a State rule,-regulation,-policy,or-practice,must be in place that is designed to ensure that agents of the United States acting under color of federal law in fact are given to access any State(or State-contracted) correctional facility for the purpose of permitting such agents to meet with individuals who are(or are believed by such agents to be)aliens and to inquire as to such individuals right to be or remain in the United States. I B.A State statute,or a State rule,-regulation,-policy,or-practice,must be in place that is designed to ensure that, when a State(or State-contracted)correctional facility receives from DHS a formal written request authorized by the Immigration and Nationality Act that seeks advance notice of the scheduled release date and time for a particular alien in such facility,then such facility will honor such request and--as early as practicable(see para.4.B.of this condition)—provide the requested notice to DHS. 2.bfonitoring The recipient's monitoring responsibilities include monitoring of subrecipient compliance with the requirements of this condition. 3.Allowable costs Compliance with these requirements is an authorized and priority purpose of this award.To the extent that such costs are not reimbursed under any other federal program,award funds may be obligated(including for authorized reimbursements)for the reasonable,necessary,and allocable costs(if any)of—(1)developing and putting into place statutes,rules,regulations,policies,and practices to satisfy this condition,and(2)permitting access as described in para.LA.above,and(3)honoring any request from DHS that is encompassed by para. I.B.above, 4.Rules of construction A.For purposes of this condition-- (1)the term"alien"means what it means under section 101 of the immigration and Nationality Act(see 8 U.S.C. I101(a)(3)). (2)the term"correctional facility"means what it means under the Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968(see 42 U.S.C.3791(a)(7)), B.Nothing in this condition shall be understood to authorize or require any recipient,any subrecipient at any tier,any State or local government,or any other entity or individual to maintain(or detain)any individual in custody beyond the date and time the individual would have been released in the absence of this condition. Current DHS practice is ordinarily to request advance notice of scheduled release"as early as practicable(at least 48 rt�� hours,if possible)."(See DHS Form 1-247A(3/17)),In the event that(e.g.,in light of the date DHS made such request) the scheduled release date and time for an alien are such as not to permit the advance notice that DHS has requested,it shall not be a violation of this condition to provide only as much advance notice as practicable. initial OJP FOkM 40002(REV.4-88) *Acceptance of Byrne-JAG 2017 funds by Plaintiffs New York,Connecticut.New Jersey,Rhode Island, Washington,and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia—and by the political subdivisions of Plaintiff states—shall not be construed as acceptance of Special Conditions¶¶52-56.Nor shall these conditions be enforced against these grantees given Judge Ramos's ruling in New YGn�et al.. v. U.S. Department of Justice et al., 18 Civ 6471 (ER)(ECF 114 and 122)(S.D.N.Y.)where these disputed conditions were enjoined for the reasons stated therein,including that 8 U S C §1373 was unconstitutional and not within the purview of "all applicable laws' as referenced in 34 U S.0 § 10153(a). U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINliATION YIV,, r ' ' Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 19 of 21 Grant PROJECT NUMBER 2017-D1-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/102M9 SPECIAL CONDITIONS NOTE:Current DHS practice is to use one form(DHS Form I-247A(3/17))for two distinct purposes—to request advance notice of scheduled release,and to request that an individual be detained for up to 48 hours AFTER the scheduled release.This condition imposes NO requirements as to such DHS requests for detention. C.Both the"Rules of Cons(ruction"and the"Important Note"set out in the award condition entitled"Ongoing �1 compliance with 8 U.S.C.1373 is required"are incorporated by reference as though set forth here in full. 56. Required local-government-level rules or practices related to aliens;allowable costs The following provisions apply to the recipient of this award,if the recipient is a unit of local government,and also initial apply to any local-government subrecipienl of this award at any tier(whether or not the recipient itself is a unit of local government). 1. Requirements With respect to the"program or activity"that is funded(in whole or in part)by this award,as of the date the recipient accepts this award,and throughout the remainder of the period ofperfomtance for the award-- A. A local ordinance,-rule,-regulation,-policy,or-practice(or an applicable State statute,-rule,-regulation,- policy,or-practice)must be in place that is designed to ensure that agents of the United States acting under color of federal law in fact are given access a local-govemment(or local-government-contracted)correctional facility for the purpose of permitting such agents to meet with individuals who are(or are believed by such agents to be)aliens and to inquire as to such individuals'right to be or remain in the United States. B. A local ordinance,-rule,-regulation,-policy,or-practice(or an applicable State statute,-rule,-regulation,- policy,or-practice)must be in place that is designed to ensure that,when a local-government(or local-government- contracted)correctional facility receives from DHS a formal written request authorized by the Immigration and Nationality Act that seeks advance notice of the scheduled release date and time for a particular alien in such facility, then such facility will honor such request and--as early as practicable(see"Rules of Construction"incorporated by para.4.B.of this condition)--provide the requested notice to DHS. 2. Monitoring The recipient's monitoring responsibilities include monitoring of subrecipicnt compliance with the requirements of this condition. 3. Allowable costs Compliance with these requirements is an authorized and priority purpose of this award. To the extent that such costs are not reimbursed under any other federal program,award funds may be obligated(including for authorized reimbursements)for the reasonable,necessary,and allocable costs(if any)of--(1)developing and putting into place statutes,ordinances,rules,regulations,policies,and practices to satisfy this condition,(2)permitting access as described in para.I.A.above,and(3)honoring any request from DHS that is encompassed by para. I.B.above. 4. Rules of construction A. The"Rules of Construction"and the"Important Note"set out in the award condition entitled"Ongoing compliance with 8 U.S.C.1373 is required"are incorporated by reference as though set forth here in full. B. The"Rules of Construction"set out in the award condition entitled"Required State-level rules or practices related to aliens;allowable costs"are incorporated by reference as though set forth here in frill. .M ial OJP FORM 4000/2(REV.4-89) 'Acceptance of Byrne-JAG 2017 funds by Plaintiffs New York,Connecticut,New Jersey,Rhode Island. Washington,and the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia—and by the political subdivisions of Plaintiff states—shall not be construed as acceptance of Special Conditions%62-56.Nor shall these conditions be enforced against these grantees given Judge Ramos's ruling in New York ei al. v U.S Department of Justice et al., 18 Civ.6471 (ER)(ECF 114 and 122)(S.D.N.Y)where these disputed conditions were enjoined for the reasons stated therein.including that 8 U.S.C.§ 1373 was unconstitutional and not within the purview of`all applicable laws"as referenced in 34 U S.C. §10153(a) U.S.Department of Justice ! % Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTIINUATION Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 20 of 21 Grant I PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-BX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/10/2018 SPECIAL COAIDITIONS i 57. Use of funds for DNA testing,upload of DNA profiles If award funds are used for DNA testing of evidentiary materials,any resulting eligible DNA profiles must be uploaded to the Combined DNA Index System("CODIS,"the DNA database operated by the FBI)by a government DNA j laboratory with access to CODIS. No profiles generated under this award may be entered or uploaded into any non-governmental DNA database without prior express written approval from BJA. Award funds may not be used for the purchase of DNA equipment and supplies unless the resulting DNA profiles may be accepted for entry into CODIS. 58. Encouragement of submission of"success stories' BJA strongly encourages the recipient to submit annual(or more frequent)JAG success stories.To submit a success story,sign in to a My BJA account at haps://www.bja.gov/Login.aspx to access the Success Story Submission form.If the recipient does not yet have a My BJA account,please register at lilps://www.bja.gov/profile.a.7x.Once registered, one of the available areas on the My BJA page will be"My Success Stories."Within this box,there is an option to add a Success Story.Once reviewed and approved by BJA,all success stories will appear on the BJA Success Story web page at https://wwnv.bja.gov/SuccessStorvLisLaspx. 59. Requirement to disclose whether recipient is designated"high risk"by a federal grant-making agency outside of DOJ If the recipient is designated"high risk"by a federal grant-making agency outside of DOJ,currently or at any time during the course of the period ofperfonnance under this award,the recipient must disclose that fact and certain related information to OJP by email at OJP.ComplianceReporting@ojp.usdoj.gov. For purposes of diis disclosure,high risk includes any status under which a federal awarding agency provides additional oversight due to the recipient's past performance,or other programmatic or financial concerns with the recipient.The recipient's disclosure must include the following:1.The federal awarding agency that currently designates the recipient high risk,2.The date the recipient was designated high risk,3.The high-risk point of contact at that federal awarding agency(name,phone number,and email address),and 4.The reasons for the high-risk status,as set out by the federal awarding agency, I 60. Reclassification of various statutory provisions to a new Title 34 of the United States Code On SSuptembcr I,2017,various m.tuwry provi:ion>preciously codified els—hcrc in the U.S.Code werc editorially reclassified to a new Title 34,entitled"Crime Control and Law Enforcement." The reclassification encompassed a number of statutory provisions pertinent to OJP awards(that is,OJP grants and cooperative agreements),including many provisions previously codified in Title 42 of the U.S.Code. i Effective as of September 1,2017,any reference in this award document to a statutory provision that has been reclassified to the new Title 34 of the U.S.Code is to be read as a reference to that statutory provision as reclassified to Title 34. This rule of construction specifically includes references set out in award conditions,references set out in material incorporated by reference through award conditions,and references set out in other award requirements. 61. Withholding of funds:Required certification from the chief executive ofthe applicant government The recipient may not obligate,expend,or draw down any award funds until the recipient submits the required C "Certifications and Assurances by the Chief Executive of the Applicant Government,"properly-executed(as determined by OJP),and a Grant Adjustment Notice(GAN)has been issued to remove this condition. initial OJP FORM 4000/2(REV.4-88) U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs AWARD CONTINUATION %2j x Bureau of Justice Assistance SHEET PAGE 21 Or 21 Grant i PROJECTNUMBER 2017-DJ-RX-0496 AWARD DATE 10/10/2018 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 62. Withholding of funds; Memorandum of Understanding The recipient may not obligate,expend,or draw down any award funds until OJP has reviewed and approved the Memorandum of Understanding(MOU),and a Grant Adjustment Notice(GAN)has been issued to remove this condition. 63. Recipient integrity and performance matters: Requirement to report information on certain civil,criminal,and administrative proceedings to SAM and FAMIIS The recipient must comply with any and all applicable requirements regarding reporting of information on civil, criminal,and administrative proceedings connected with(or connected to the performance of)either this OJP award or any other grant,cooperative agreement,or procurement contract from the federal government- Under certain circumstances,recipients of OJP awards are required to report information about such proceedings,through the federal System for Award Management(known as"SAM"),to the designated federal integrity and performance system (currently,"FAPIIS"). The details of recipient obligations rega=rding the re.Iuired reporting(and updating)of information on certain civil, criminal.and,idrnimstraiive procccdings to the federal designated integrity and perfor=mance system(currently, "FAPIIS")within SAM are posted on the OJP web site at https://ojp.goN,/funding/FAPIIS.hun(Award condition: Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters,including Recipient Reporting to FAPIIS),and are incorporated by reference here. 0 I I I OUP FORM 40011/2(REV.4-88) initial U.S.Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs J �w Bureau of Justice Assistance lyoshingtm D.C. 20531 Memorandum To: Official Grant File From: Orbin Terry,NEPA Coordinator Subject: Incorporates NEPA Compliance in Further Developmental Stages for City of Seattle The Edward Byme Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program(JAG)allows states and local governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent and control crime and to improve the criminal justice system,some of which could have environmental impacts. All recipients of JAG funding must assist BJA in complying with NEPA and other related federal environmental impact analyses requirements in the use of grant funds,whether the funds are used directly by the grantee or by a subgrantee or third parry. Accordingly,prior to obligating funds for any of the specified activities,the grantee must first determine if any of the specified activities will be funded by the grant. The specified activities requiring environmental analysis are: a,New construction; b.Any renovation or remodeling of a property located in an environmentally or historically sensitive area; including properties located within a 100-year flood plain.a wetland.or habitat for endangered-species,or a proper[y listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Placcs; e. A renovation,lease,or any proposed use of a building or facility that will either(a)result in a change in its basic prior use or(b)significantly change its size; d. Inplementation of a new program involving the use of chemicals other than chemicals that are(a)purchased as an incidental component of a funded actin ity and(b)traditionally used,for example. in office,household, recreational,or education environments;and e. Implementation of a program relating to clandestine methamphetamine laboratory operations,including the identification,seizure,or closure of clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. Complying with NEPA may require the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and,"or au Environmental Impact Statement, as directed by BJA. Further,for Programs relating to methamphetamine laboratory operations, the preparation of a detailed Mitigation Plan will be required, For more information about Mitigation Plan requirements,please see httpS:Iluil,�w,.bja.go r/Funditi_phtepa.html. Please be sure to carefully review the grant conditions on your award document,as it may contain more specific information about environmental compliance. U.S.Department of Justice GRANT MANAGER'S MEMORANDUM,PT.1: Office of Justice Programs PROJECT SUMMARY Bureau of Justice Assistance 1 Grant s PROJECT NUMBER 2017-D]-$X-0496 PAGE 1 OF 1 ' This project is supported under FYI7(BJA-JAG State and JAG Local)Title I of Pub.L.No.90-351(generally codified at 42 U.S.C.3711-3797f1 5),including subpart 1 ofpart E(codified at 42 U.S.C.3750-3758);see also 28 U.S.C.530C(b). I 1.STAFF CONTACT(Name&telephone number) 2.PROJECT DIRECTOR(Name,address&telephone number) Jeffrey S.Felton-Green Diane Pilon (202)514.8874 Strategic Advisor 610 5th Avenue P.O.Box 34986 Seattle,WA 98124-4986 (206)386-1996 3a.TITLE OF THE PROGRAM 3b.POMS CODE(SEE INSTRUCTIONS B]A FY 17 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)Program-Local Solicitation ON REVERSE) I 4 TITLE OF PROJECT FY 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance(JAG)Grant Formula Program 5.NAME&ADDRESS OF GRANTEE 6.NAME&ADRESS OF SUBGRANTEE City of Seattle 700 Sib Avenue,Suite 5800 Seattle,W.4 981244708 7.PROGRAM PERIOD S.BUDGET PERIOD FROM: 10/012016 TO: 09/30/2020 FROM: 10/01/2016 TO: 09/302020 9.AMOUNT OF AWARD 10.DATE OF AWARD �I S 657,975 10/102018 11.SECOND YEAR'S BUDGET 12.SECOND YEAR'S BUDGET AMOUNT 13.THIRD YEARS BUDGET PERIOD 1 14.THIRD YEAR'S BUDGET AMOUNT 15,SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT(See instruction on reverse) Tho Edward Bymc Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program 1JAG)allows states and units of local government,including tribes,to support a broad range of criminaljustice related activities bused on their own state and local needs and conditions,Grant funds can be used for state and local initiatives,technical assistance, 1 training,personnel,equipment,supplies,contractual support,and information systems for criminal justice,including for any one or more of the following purpose I areas:1)law enforcemenf programs;2)prosecution and court programs;3)prevention and education programs;4)corrections and community corrections programs; 5)drug treatment and enforcement programs;6)planning,evaluation,and technology improvement programs;7)crime victim and witness programs(other than compensation);and 8)mentul health programs and related low enforcement and corrections programs,including behavioral programs and crisis intervention tcams- This Local JAG award will be shared by the County and one or more jurisdictions identified as disparate within the current Fiscal Year eligibility list (wv A'.bja.gov/lag).JAG funding will be used to support criminal justice initiatives that fall under one or more of the allowable program areas above.Any OJP FORM 4000/2(REV.448) ti" initial equipmcru purchases or funded initiatives such as oVcrLime,tisk forces,drug programs,information sharing,etc.will be aimed at reducing crime and'or enhancing public/officcr safeq. NCA/NCF r j /initial FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application—Budget Worksheet& Narrative A. Personnel CITY OF SEATTLE: Name/Position _ Computation_ Cost Crime Prevention Coordinator Salary weekly salary #of weeks #of positions (3 positions) $1,731 38 3 $197,334 TOTAL: $197,334 B. Fringe Benefits CITY OF SEATTLE: Name/Position Computation Cost Crime Prevention Coordinator Salary weekly benefits #of weeks #of positions (3 positions) $480.90 38 3 $54,823 1 TOTAL: $54,823 Seattle SubTotal: $252,157 G. Consultants/Contracts CITY OF AUBURN: #of Purpose OT Rate Hours Teen Late Night Program Officer OT $86.18 47 $4,050 Citizen's Police Academy Program Officer OT $86.18 29 $2,499 Fireworks Emphasis Program Officer OT $86.18 278 $23,958 Misc. Supplies for Teen Late Night vendor estimate $60 Auburn SubTotal: $30,568 CITY OF BELLEVUE: Purpose Location Item Computation Officer Safety Training Airfare 8 x$500 each $4,000.00 Officer Safety Training Lodging 8 x$400 each $3,200.00 Officer Safety Training Per Diem 8 x$250 each $2,000.00 Officer Safety Training Conf. fee 8 x$500 each $4,000.00 Officer Safety Training Misc. Travel 8 x 114.75 each $918.00 Bellevue SubTotal: $14,118 CITY OF BURIEN: Purpose Location Computation Cost WSSO SRO Annual Con£ Registration WA State I SRO x $350 $350 WSSO Conference Travel WA State 500 miles x .56/mile $280 WSSO Conference Hotel/Per Diem WA State 4 days x$175/day $700 Bicycle Repair School Registration I Officer x$250 $250 Overtime for Training 40 hours x$90/hour $3,600 Security Cameras and Installation for City Hall/Library 4 cameras x$2,500/each $10,000 Less Lethal Shotguns 7 @$600 each $4,200 Page 1 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application—Budget Worksheet& Narrative Bicycle Racks 3 @$250 each $750 Misc.Police Equipment $948 Burien SubTotal: $21,078 CITY OF DES MOINES: Item Computation Cost One(1)Sergeant Instructor Overtime 24 hours x$82 $1,968 One(1) Sergeant Backfill Overtime 24 hours x$82 $1,968 Two(2)Officer Instructor Overtime 96 hours x $70 $6,720 Reality Based Officer Safety Equipment vendor estimate $466 Des Moines SubTotal: $11,122 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: Item Computation Cost (average hourly Temporary IT Support rate) $18 x 1907 Hours $34,331 Federal Way SubTotal: $31,331 CITY OF KENT: Item Computation Cost Officer OT-Racer Emphasis/Hot Spot Policing-2018 $65 x 72 hours $4,680 Officer OT-Racer Emphasis/Hot Spot Policing-2019 $67 x 72 hours $4,824 Social Security(OT) $9636 x .0765 $736 Retirement(OT) $9636 x .065 $626 Microsoft Surface Pro Tablets for use by FTOs $1,000 x 4 tablets $4,000 Civil Disturbance Team Upper Body Protective Equipment vendor estimate $5,132 Enhancements to FATS Use of Force Training Simulator vendor estimate $12,000 Graffiti Removal Kits $100 x 20 Kits $2.000 �— Kent SubTotal: $33,998 KING COUNTY: Item Computation Cost Patty Noble-Desy- Salary 75%of grant $150,848 Recidivism Reduction/Reentry Coordinator (Senior Project Manager) Patty Noble-Desy-Benefits 25%of grant $50,283 Recidivism Reduction/Reentry Coordinator (Senior Project Manager) King County SubTotal: $201,131 CITY OF RFNTON: Purpose Computation Cost End Violence Against Women Conf Registration Dallas TX 6 ofc x$250 $1,500 End Violence Against Women Annual Conf Travel Dallas TX 6 @ 391 $2,346 Page 2 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application —Budget Worksheet& Narrative End Violence Against Women Conf Hotel/PerDiem WA State 5 days x$175/day $5,250 Technology Training Registration 1 @ 3500 $3,500 Purchase of airfare and taxi voucher WA State 40 @$25 $1,000 Gift Cards(emergency groceries,supplies,and clothing) 80 @ 25 $2,000 Hotel Vouchers for Victims 10 @ 100 $1,000 Human Trafficking investigations(hotel rooms,Web access) 2 @ 500 $1,000 Human Trafficking Victim Support-Transportation to and from Court 40 trips x$12.50 each $500 Technology equipment—improvements and purchase new hardware 2@ 2224 $4,448 Technology improvements(Software—New forensics program) 1 @ 4000 $3,192 Miscellaneous Supplies $404 Renton SubTotal: 526,140 CITY OF SEATAC: Item Computation Cost $100 per hour x 140 Police Officer Overtime hours $14,000 Ballistic Blankets 2 @ $1,500 each $3,000 Training Development/Implementation Supplies 415 $415 SeaTac SubTotal: $17,415 CITY OF TUKWILA: Items Computation Cost Leadership Training 3 @$1,667 (Location TBD) $5,001 Treadmill 1 @ $5,916 $5,916 Monitor and mount 1 @ $1,000 $1,000 Clothing ensemble for Firearms Instructors 2 @ $2,000 $4,000 Tukwila SubTotal: $15,917 BUDGET SUMMARY Overall Summary Total Budget Category Budget A. Personnel $197,334 B. Fringe Benefits $54,823 C. Travel $0 D. Equipment $0 E. Supplies $0 Page 3 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application—Budget Worksheet& Narrative F. Construction $0 G. Contractual $405,818 H. Other $0 Total Direct Costs: $657,975 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS: $657,975 TOTAL JOINT ALLOCATION: $657,975 Page 4 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application–Budget Worksheet& Narrative Budget Narrative A. Personnel ($197,334) A request of$197,334 is included for City of Seattle for salary costs associated with preservation of 3 Crime Prevention Coordinator Positions in the Seattle Police Department. This amount will pay for 38 weeks in 2018. B. Fringe Benefits ($54,823) A request of$54,823 is included for City of Seattle for fringe benefit costs associated with preservation of 3 Crime Prevention Coordinator Positions in the Seattle Police Department. Fringe benefits are City of Seattle standard fringe benefits for civilian personnel, and include FICA, Health Care Medicare, Life Insurance, Retirement, Workers Comp, EAP, Disability Insurance, and Death Benefits, and are calculated at a rate of approximately 28% of base salary. G. Consultants/Contracts ($405,818) As the fiscal agent, City of Seattle will enter into Interagency Agreements with all of the sub-agencies listed below. Sub-Agencies will be required to spend their funds, and then request reimbursement from City of Seattle. Therefore, we are listing all of the costs associated with their programs under Consultants/Contracts: City of Auburn ($30,568) A request of$30,568 will cover Auburn Police Officer overtime costs associated with three programs requested by City of Auburn: Teen Late Night, Citizen's Police Academy, and Fireworks Emphasis Patrols. At an average overtime rate of$86.18 per hour, approximately 354 hours of overtime will be worked. Additionally, $60 is requested for miscellaneous office supplies for Teen Late Night. City of Bellevue ($14,118) All of the proposed Bellevue allocation of$14,118 shall be allocated to Travel/Training for the Investigations Unit, to include Special Operations Group and Crime Analysis as well. Costs will be expended in the traditional categories—Airfare, lodging, conference fees, per diem, and miscellaneous travel (baggage, transportation to/from airport, etc.). All trips shall be used toward conferences/courses that emphasis Officer Safety/Wellness. City of Burien ($21,078) Page 5 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application—Budget Worksheet& Narrative Traininp-'Travel ($1,580): Besides basic academy and ongoing required training, the City of Burien has no budget dedicated towards the enhanced training of its officers. Having the ability to send officers to enhanced training will make our officers more effective towards reducing crime and improving officer safety. Travel costs are included if the annual class is not located nearby. Training classes proposed include school resource officer training, and a bicycle repair class so repairs to the 2 new police bikes can be done in-house, rather than sent to a bicycle shop. Overtime for training ($3.600): In addition, our total number of officers generally only allows us to meet minimum staffing requirements. Overtime backfill is required most of the time when we send officers to training, and funds from this grant would be used to fulfill our staffing requirements when sending officers to important training. Security cameras and installation($10,000): Increased social disorder crimes are occurring in the downtown Town Square area near the City Hall/Library. Security cameras and installation are proposed as a way to help manage these crimes. Less lethal shotguns ($4,200): Less lethal shotguns are proposed as a potential way to handle escalated incidents from longer distance than Taser guns allow. Bicycle Racks/Mise. Police Equipmen(($1 698 : Two new police bikes were purchased with an earlier JAG grant, so bicycle racks and other miscellaneous bicycle/police equipment is proposed. City of Des Moines ($11,122) Funds from the JAG Grant will allow the Des Moines Police Department to pay instructor overtime to provide reality-based training utilizing simulations as a means to optimize future performance and enhance officer safety. In addition, the grant funds will allow the department to pay overtime to backfill a sergeant position thus allowing the sergeant instructor to conduct the training during his scheduled work day. There will be at least 4-12 hour long days of instruction requiring three (3) instructors for each day. The participant officers attending this training will be on their normal duty time. Reality-Based/ Officer Safety Training Program One(1) Sergeant Instructor Overtime: 24 hours x $82.00 = $1,968 One (1) Sergeant Backfill Overtime: 24 hours x $82.00 = $1,968 Two (2) Officer Instructor Overtime: 96 hours x $70.00 = $6,720 Total Overtime Cost $10,656 Funds from the JAG Grants will allow the Des Moines Police Department the ability to purchase necessary safety equipment to assure the participant officers and scenario actors are safe.. This safety equipment includes headgear, gloves, eyewear or other protective equipment. Reality-Based/ Officer Safety Equipment = $466 Page 6 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application —Budget Worksheet & Narrative City of Federal Way ($34,331) Funds are requested to provide temporary support personnel in the Information Technology Department to support GIS improvement for address verification and enhanced GIS mapping. The salary is a based upon an average overtime rate of$18 per hour and 1,907 hours worked. City of Kent($33,998) 2017 JAG funds will include a total of$9,504 in overtime wages. On the budget worksheet, each year is divided out—2018 we estimate 72 hours of overtime at an average overtime rate of$65 per hour. We increase the overtime rate for 2019 rates to include collective bargaining contracts wage increases. In 2018 we estimate 72 hours of overtime at a rate of$67 per hour. We included fringe benefits for the overtime. Fringe benefits include Social Security calculated at .0765 and Retirement calculated at .065. We estimate the Microsoft Surface Pro Laptops/Tablets to cost $1,000 each based upon the quote given to us from our Information Technology Department. We are requested four of these for a total of$4,000. We will use$5,132 to purchase upper body protective equipment for members of our Civil Disturbance team. These items will include elbow pads, thinner less combative looking vests. We will work with our department uniform distributor to get the best pricing possible at the time these JAG lands become available. We will use $12,000 to purchase technology which will enhance our Fire Arms Training Simulator. We will work with the vendor to get the best pricing possible at the time these JAG funds become available. We budgeted $2,000 to equip 20 additional graffiti removal kits with a cost of$100 per kit. These kits include spray paint, roller pads, rollers, and graffiti wipes and are used by volunteers and community groups for graffiti clean-up. King County ($201,131) Patty Noble-Desy: Recidivism Reduction/Reentry Coordinator(Senior Project Manager) 75% of grant: $150,848 (Salary Costs) Patty Noble-Desy: Recidivism Reduction/Reentry Coordinator (Senior Project Manager) 25% of grant: $50,283 (Benefit Costs) Page 7 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application —Budget Worksheet & Narrative City of Renton ($26,140) Training is an ongoing challenge for all small police agencies. Finding the best and most relevant training can be a struggle. This agency has a history of insuring members of the organization receive the best possible training. However, since training can be costly, officer who attend outside training are required to bring this information back to their respective workgroups. Additionally, any new tactics or technics for investigating a crime are put into department wide training and regularly implemented department wide. This is the best way to maximize the use of this training money, effectively more than tripling its effectiveness. Funds will also be utilized to send Renton Police personnel to Technology related Training. Funds allocated for Training: $12,596 Equipment funds will primarily be used for technological advances for the department. The added advantage here is that the Renton Police Department is utilizing its new expertise to our smaller law enforcement partners. This prevents them from having to ask larger, already overworked, agencies for their help. Additionally, we purchase updated investigative equipment that are often used to assist our partners in regional investigations such as our Valley Investigative Team, a regional use of force investigations group. Funds allocated for Equipment: $7,640 Our projects require a certain amount of regular and ongoing supplies to keep them working. Such supplies include training and educational materials,printing materials, public display materials and repair or replacement materials for prints, copiers and fax systems. Funds in the supply category are additionally requested to support services for victims and for investigative supplies. Funds allocated for Supplies: $5,904 City of SeaTac ($17,415) A request of$14,000 is included for officer overtime. At an average overtime rate of approximately$100 per hour, 140 hours of overtime will be worked. SeaTac Police will use the$14,000 for 140 hours of overtime to develop/implement training and education programs related to In-Progress Violence Response Training and Education for first responders and community members; Law Enforcement Programs; Multiple-Assault Counter Terrorism Action Capability(MACTAC)Training; Civilian Response to Active Shooter Events (CRASE). This will include overtime for course/program development and implementation and backfill overtime while officers are in training. A request of$3,000 is included for the purchase of Ballistic Blankets. At$1,500 each,two blankets will be purchased. A request of$415 is included for training development and implementation supplies. Supplies will be purchased to assist with development, implementation and maintenance of the training/education efforts. Page 8 of 9 FY 2017 JAG City of Seattle Joint Application —Budget Worksheet& Narrative City of Tukwila ($15,917) Training and Professional Development: $5001 The Tukwila Police Department will use these funds to send department members to professional leadership development courses, such as the Leadership in Police Organizations course offered by the IACP. The Tukwila Police Department's strategic plan includes providing leadership training department wide, and the LPO course is one of nationally sought training courses due to the content and value of what is provided in the cost of the training. The cost for each attendee is $1667 per attendee, for a three-week training course that is conducted one week at a time over three month time period. Gym Equipment: $5916 The Tukwila Police Department will use these funds to purchase a treadmill for the city owned gym facility. Our agency has identified an officer as a leader regarding employee health and physical fitness; this officer has conducted research to determine the most cost and quality effective treadmill that can be purchased with these funds. Firearms Training Cadre Equipment: $1,000 The Tukwila Police Department will use these funds to purchase a monitor and mount for the trailer that is used by the Firearms Cadre. A Firearms Cadre Instructor has conducted research to determine the size of monitor needed to maximize training efficiency, to include the corresponding sized mount. The cost for these two items is $1,000. Additionally, as our agency has grown, so has the size of our Firearms Instructor Cadre. Currently,there are two instructors who need to be fully outfitted with an instructor's uniform and corresponding gear. The cost for these two instructors to be fully outfitted is $2,000 per instructor, for a total of$4,000 to outfit both instructors. The uniform for each instructor will include: two pairs of range pants ($250), two polo shirts ($150), two pairs of shorts ($150), cold weather gear($350), rain gear($350), equipment/armorer bags ($150), storage containers ($200), range vest carriers ($400) Page 9 of 9 Memorandum of Understanding Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program FY 2017 Local Solicitation Executed by City of Seattle Department Authorized Representative: Faye Landskov 610 5th Avenue PO Box 34986 Seattle,WA 98124-4986 and City of Federal Way, hereinafter referred to as "Subrecipient" JAG Grant Manager: Diane C. Shines 33325 8 Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement by having their representatives affix their signatures below. FY 17 JAG Interagency Agreement,Page 1 of 7 City of Federal Way City of Seattle Jim Ferrell, Mayor Mark R. Baird Chief Operating Officer, Seattle Police Department Date: Date: Authorized by: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG)Program WHEREAS, the Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to state and local jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the JAG Program supports all components of the criminal justice system, from multi-jurisdictional drug and gang task forces to crime prevention and domestic violence programs, courts, corrections, treatment, and justice information sharing initiatives; and WHEREAS, the United States Congress authorized $657,975 in the Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program for jurisdictions in King County; and WHEREAS, 11 jurisdictions in King County were required to apply for a JAG Program award with a single,joint application; and WHEREAS, the City of Seattle ("City"),as the identified Fiscal Agent, submitted the joint application to the Bureau of Justice Assistance on September 5, 2017 to request JAG Program funds; and WHEREAS, based on the City's successful application, the Bureau of Justice Assistance has awarded $657,975 to the City from these JAG Program funds; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the grant whereby the City, as the identified Fiscal Agent for this award, is to distribute grant funds to co-applicants,the City intends to transfer some of the JAG funds it receives to those co-applicants; and WHEREAS,the City is not obligated to continue or maintain grant funding levels for the JAG Program once grant funds have lapsed; and WHEREAS, Subrecipients of JAG funds from the City should not anticipate the City will assume responsibility for any program costs funded by JAG once JAG funds are spent; NOW THEREFORE,the parties hereto agree as follows: This Interagency Agreement contains seven Articles: FY 17 JAG Interagency Agreement,Page 2 of 7 ARTICLE I: TERM OF AGREEMENT: The term of this Interagency Agreement shall be in effect from the date it is executed, until September 30, 2020 unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions hereof. ARTICLE II: DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services to be performed under this Agreement shall be conducted for the stated purposes of the Byrne Memorial justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program (42 U.S.C. 3751(a.) The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to state and local jurisdictions. The JAG Program provides states and units of local governments with critical funding necessary to support a range of program areas including law enforcement; prosecution and court programs; prevention and education programs; corrections and community corrections; drug treatment and enforcement; crime victim and witness initiatives; and planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs. ARTICLE III: SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Funds are provided by the U.S. Department of justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of justice Assistance solely for the purpose of furthering the stated objectives of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. The Subrecipient shall use the funds to perform tasks as described in the Scope of Work portion of this Agreement. 2. The Subrecipient acknowledges that because this Agreement involves federal funding, the period of performance described herein will likely begin prior to the City's receipt of appropriated federal funds. The Subrecipient agrees that it will not hold the City or the Department of justice liable for any damages, claim for reimbursement, or any type of payment whatsoever for services performed under this Agreement prior to the City's receipt and distribution of federal funds. In the event that the Department of justice requires the City to repay awarded funds for failure to comply with Special Conditions 52-56 listed in Attachment A,the Subrecipient will repay the City any funds it received under this Agreement that the City is required to repay to the federal government. Subrecipient further acknowledges and agrees that the City may reject federal funds if it is required to comply with Special Conditions 52-56 as a prerequisite for receiving these funds. Subrecipient will not pursue the City for such funds but may be able to pursue the federal government. 3. This contract is funded with federal grant funds under CFDA 16.738. The grant is FY 2017 Justice Assistance Grant Program Award # 2017-DJ-BX-0496. All federal financial and grant management rules and regulations must be adhered to in the execution of this contract. Exhibit Attachment A is a copy of the federal award documents. All special conditions stated in the award documents apply to the execution of this contract. All Subrecipients are assumed to have read, understood, and accepted the Award as binding. 4. The Subrecipient acknowledges that all allocations and use of funds under this agreement will be in accordance with the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance FY 17 JAG Interagency Agreement,Page 3 of 7 Grant (JAG) Program: FY 2017 Local Solicitation. Allocation and use of grant funding must be coordinated with the goals and objectives included in the Local Solicitation.All Subrecipients are assumed to have read, understood, and accepted the Local Solicitation as binding. 5. Subrecipient agrees to obtain a valid DUNS profile and create an active registration with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database no later than the due date of the Subrecipient's first quarterly report after a subaward is made. 6. The Subrecipient shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and program guidance. The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, as adopted and supplemented by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2 C.F.R Part 2800 (together, the "Part 200 Uniform Requirements") apply to this 2017 award from the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). 7. The Subrecipient must comply with the most recent version of the Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals, and Audit Requirements. a. Non-Federal entities that expend $500,000 or more in one fiscal year in Federal awards shall have a single or program-specific audit conducted for that year in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133- Audits of States, Local Governments, and non-Profit Organizations. Non-federal entities that spend less than $500,000 a year in federal awards are exempt from federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No.A-133, but records must be available for review or audit by appropriate officials of the Federal agency, pass-through entity, and General Accounting Office (GAO). b. Subrecipients required to have an audit must ensure the audit is performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS),as found in the Government Auditing Standards (the Revised Yellow Book) developed by the Comptroller General and the OMB Compliance Supplement. The Subrecipient has the responsibility of notifying the Washington State Auditor's Office and requesting an audit. c. The Subrecipient shall maintain auditable records and accounts so as to facilitate the audit requirement and shall ensure that any sub-recipients also maintain auditable records. d. The Subrecipient is responsible for any audit exceptions incurred by its own organization or that of its subcontractors. Responses to any unresolved management findings and disallowed or questioned costs shall be included with the audit report submitted to the Seattle Police Department. The Subrecipient must respond to requests for information or corrective action concerning audit issues or findings within 30 days of the date of request. The City reserves the right to recover from the Subrecipient all disallowed costs resulting from the audit. FY 17 JAG Interagency Agreement,Page 4 of 7 e. If applicable, once any single audit has been completed,the Subrecipient must send a full copy of the audit to the City and a letter stating there were no findings, or if there were findings,the letter should provide a list of the findings. The Subrecipient must send the audit and the letter no later than nine months after the end of the Subrecipient's fiscal year(s) to: Faye Landskov,JAG Program Manager Seattle Police Department 610 Sth Avenue PO Box 34986 Seattle,WA 98124-4986 206-733-9163 f. In addition to sending a copy of the audit,the Subrecipient must include a corrective action plan for any audit findings and a copy of the management letter if one was received. The Subrecipient shall include the above audit requirements in any subcontracts. g. The Subrecipient agrees to cooperate with any assessments, national evaluation efforts, or information or data collection requirements, including, but not limited to,the provision of any information required for assessment or evaluation of activities within this agreement, and for compliance BJA reporting requirements. h. Suspension and Debarment: The Subrecipient certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in transactions by any Federal department or agency. By signing and submitting this Agreement, the Subrecipient is providing the signed certification set out below. The certification this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the Subrecipient rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Government and City may pursue available remedies, including termination and/or debarment. The Subrecipient shall provide immediate written notice to the City if at any time the Subrecipient learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The Subrecipient agrees by signing this Agreement that it shall not enter into any covered transaction with a person or subcontractor who is debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized in writing by the City. The Subrecipient shall include the requirement in this section in any subcontracts. ARTICLE IV: SCOPE OF WORK The Scope of Work of this Agreement and the time schedule for completion of such work is as described in Attachment B: JAG Budget Worksheet, as approved by BJA.Attachment B is attached to and made part of this agreement. FY 17 JAG Interagency Agreement,Page 5 of 7 The work shall, at all times, be subject to the City's general review and approval. The Subrecipient shall confer with the City periodically during the progress of the Work, and shall prepare and present such information and materials (e.g. a detailed outline of completed work) as may be pertinent, necessary, or requested by the City or BJA to determine the adequacy of the Work or Subrecipient's progress. ARTICLE V: PAYMENT 1. Cornpensation The Subrecipient shall be reimbursed on an actual cost basis. Compensation under this Agreement cannot exceed $34,331. The Subrecipient shall incur authorized allowable expenses in accordance with the Project Budget, as detailed in Attachment B. The Subrecipient may request additional reimbursement up to the amount of interest accrued on their portion of the grant award. The City will provide quarterly statements to the Subrecipient, once the interest balance accrued equals at least$1,000. Reimbursements will not be made for interest accrued that is less than $1,000. Reimbursements can be requested, up to the total amount of interest accrued, after the initial quarterly statement has been sent,to perform tasks in accordance with the Project Budget, as detailed in Attachment B. No travel or subsistence costs, including lodging and meals, reimbursed with federal funds may exceed federal maximum rates,which can be found at: http://www.gsa.gov. 2. N7aiiner o f Payment The Subrecipient shall submit reimbursement requests not more than monthly, and at least quarterly.After the first quarter, monthly submission is preferred. Requests are due no later than 30 days after the end of the period in which the work was performed. Reimbursement request forms are provided. Substitute forms are acceptable. With each reimbursement request,the Subrecipient shall submit: m Detailed spreadsheet of expenditures by task and related financial documents (timesheets, invoices) m These documents and invoices must be kept on file by the Subrecipient and be made available upon request by the City or to state or federal auditors, for at least six years after the closure of the grant. Reimbursement will not be processed without accompanying documentation for the corresponding costs. Once the above conditions are met, payment shall be made by the City to the Subrecipient. FY 17 JAG Interagency Agreement,Page 6 of 7 Submit invoicing to Submit Documentation to Fiscal Accounts Payable Faye Landskov, JAG Program Manager Seattle Police Department Seattle Police Department 610 Sth Avenue 610 Sth Avenue PO Box 34986 PO Box 34986 Seattle,WA 98124-4986 Seattle,WA 98124-4986 SPDAP@seattle.gov 206-733-9163 Article V1. COOPERATION IN MONITORING AND EVALUATION. 1. SPD Responsibilities: SPD shall monitor, evaluate and provide guidance and direction to Subrecipient in the conduct of Approved Services performed under this Agreement. SPD has the responsibility to determine whether Subrecipient has spent funds in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, including the federal audit requirements and agreements and shall monitor the activities of Subrecipient to ensure that Subrecipient has met such requirements. SPD may require Subrecipient to take corrective action if deficiencies are found. SPD will not monitor Subrecipient's adherence to Special Conditions S2-56 in the Grant Award and Special Conditions documents. 2. Subrecipient Responsibilities. a. Subrecipient shall permit SPD to carry out monitoring and evaluation activities, including any performance measurement system required by applicable law, regulation, funding sources guidelines or by the terms and conditions of the applicable Notice of Prime Award, and Subrecipient agrees to ensure,to the greatest extent possible, the cooperation of its agents, employees and board members in such monitoring and evaluation efforts. This provision shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. b. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully with any reviews or audits of the activities under this Agreement by authorized representatives of SPD, DOJ,the U.S. Government Accountability Office or the Comptroller General of the United States and Subrecipient agrees to ensure to the extent possible the cooperation of its agents, employees and board members in any such reviews and audits. This provision shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE VII: AMENDMENTS No modification or amendment of the provisions hereof shall be effective unless in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. The parties hereto expressly reserve the right to modify this Agreement, by mutual agreement. FY 17 JAG Interagency Agreement,Page 7 of 7 City of Seattle Invoice Voucher JAG 2017 invoice #: Agency Name: Sub Recipient Certification: Seattle Police Department 610 5th Avenue I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the items&totals PO Box 34986 listed herein are proper charges for materials, merchandise, or Seattle,WA 98124-4986 services furnished,and that all goods furnished and/or services rendered have been provided in accordance with the approved JAG Program Narrative and Project Budget,and comply with all requirements set forth in the JAG Interagency Agreement. Sub Recipient: (Reimbursement is payable to) Diane Shines City of Federal Way 33325 8 AV S Submitted by: Federal Way,WA 98003 Diane Shines,Sub Recipient Project Director Date: Approved by: CFDA#16.738 Grant#2017 D1 BX 0496 Faye Landskov,Seattle JAG Program Manager Project Title: Project FY 2017 Justice Assistance Grant Program Date: Activity Grant Term Dates:10/1/2016-9/30/2020 Submitted herewith for payment are expenditures made for services performed and/or supplies and materials received during the above period. Duplicate copies of time sheet summary,invoices, proof of payment, proof of receipt,and signature are attached. A Project Status Report,as outlined in the Interagency agreement,is also attached to this voucher. Original documentation are maintained on file. Current Past Cumulative Project Budget Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Balance Personnel $ 34,331.00 $ - $ $ $ 34,331.00 Fringe Benefits $ - $ $ $ $ - Travel/Training $ $ $ $ $ - Equipment/Supplies $ $ $ $ - Consultants/Contracts $ $ $ - $ $ Other $ - $ $ $ $ TOTAL $ 34,331.00 $ $ $ $ 34,331.00 Revised 3/11/10 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 6a CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:PAEC INTERIM FUNDING POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve PAEC interim funding need in the amount of$425,000 COMMITTEE: NA MEETING DATE: NA CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: John Hutton, Parks Director DEPT: Parks Attachments: Staff Report: PAEC interim funding Memo from Brian Hoffman-PAEC General Manager: Spectra Venue Management Options Considered: 1. Approve transfer of funds in the amount$425,000 to the PAEC for interim operation funding 2. Do not Approve transfer of funds in the amount of $425,000 to the PAEC for interim operation funding and provide staff with direction MAYOR's RECOMhIEND TION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: // DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Cot hitt C Cou it Initial[Date )4� Initial/17 tC Lnitial ?atc COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION-NA Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the transfer of funds in the amount of$425,000 to the PAEC operating account" (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION 4 CITY OF V DATE: September 11, 2019 To: Mayor Jim Ferrell and City Council FROM: John Hutton, Parks & Recreation Director Ade Ariwoola, Finance Director RE: Staff Report regarding PAEC Interim Funding Financial impacts-The PAEC interim funding financial impact is $425,000.00. The PAEC and City planned to analyze and discuss additional funding allocation during the 2019 Budget Amendment;however initial funding has left the PAEC just short of the Budget Amendment timeline. Future financial impact will be brought before the Mayor and City Council for approval during the 2019 Amendment Presentations. Upon City Council approval Finance Director Ade Ariwoola will fund the request. Background In 2018,the City of Federal Way entered into an agreement with Spectra Venue Management to manage and operate the Performing Arts&Event Center on behalf and for benefit of the City of Federal Way. During the 2019/2020 Biennial Budget process,City Council approved$453,855 for initial PAEC funding. Under the Spectra management contract, Spectra acts as our managing agent for the facility and the City retains ownership of the facility and ultimate responsibility for profit or loss. Specifically,the City remains liable for all debts and liabilities incurred by the operation of the facility, including things such as personnel costs, utility costs, booking fees, etc. As the manager, Spectra is contractually obligated to exercise reasonable commercial, good faith efforts to minimize operating expenses and maximize operating revenues. Staff believes that Spectra has lived up to this requirement and has closed the gap between revenue generation and operating costs by approximately$400,000.00 in its first year of operations.Even so,the facility continues to require a subsidy to continue operations,and the City is contractually obligated to provide that subsidy. CITY OF _ SPECTRA DATE: September 11, 2019 TO: Mayor Jim Ferrell and City Council FROM: Brian Hoffman, General Manager PAEC, Spectra Venue Management RE: PAEC Interim Funding Spectra Venue Management is requesting funding approval in the amount of$425,000.00 to cover operating costs in the coming months at the Federal Way Performing Arts and Event Center. Operating costs which these funds will cover include but are not limited to payroll,utilities,advertising and performance costs. Some operational and performance contracts were put in place prior to Spectra being awarded the management agreement in August 2018. These contracts ran through June of 2019 thus creating some financial challenges to the PAEC operations. These challenges we continue to overcome in our first year of operation. I am pleased to report at this time Spectra is forecasting an overall operational savings of approximately $400,000.00 in 2019 vs calendar year 2018. Spectra continues to analyze the operational needs of the facility by looking at all cost saving measures and exploring all avenues to continue to be fiscally responsible at the PAEC on behalf of the City of Federal Way and its residents. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#. 6b : CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED KING COUNTY REGIONAL HOMELESSNESS AUTHORITY POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council approve a letter to the King County Council, City of Seattle Mayor and Seattle City Council,King County City Mayors and Sound Cities Association Board regarding the proposed King County Regional Homelessness Authority. COMMITTEE: NA MEETING DATE: NA CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing X City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Bill Vadino DEPT: Attachments: Draft letter to be provided at (or before) the council meeting. Options Considered: (1)Approve the draft letter (2) Approve the draft letter with modifications (3) Do not draft letter and provide direction to staff _. _.........................- MAYOR'S REcomNIENDATiON: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: ( C� DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �3 Coninittele Cuuru i InitiaL'Date InitiaVDat IIIIII I)iwie COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of a letter to the King County Council, City of Seattle Mayor and Seattle City Council, King County Mayors and Sound Cities Association Board members regarding the proposed King County Regional Homelessness Authority." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading _ ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# (VV i CITY OF MAYOR'S OFFICE 33325 8th Avenue South Federal �Nav�' Federal Way,WA 3)98003-6325 2400(253)835-2400 fes, +gyred on www.cityoffederalway..com Jim Ferrell, Mayor September 17, 2019 Honorable King County Executive Dow Constantine Honorable Mayor of Seattle Jenny A. Durkan Honorable Members of the Seattle City Council Honorable Members of the King County Council Honorable King County Mayors Dear King County Electeds, At the September 17, 2019 meeting, and with the concurrent approval of the Mayor, the undersigned members of the Federal Way City Council unanimously voted to forward our concerns regarding the proposed King County Regional Homelessness Authority. On September 4th, the proposal was announced to create a King County Regional Homelessness Authority, a Public Development Authority. This was unveiled at a press conference featuring the King County Executive, the Seattle Mayor, Sound Cities Association (SCA) members and other representatives working on homelessness issues. It is our understanding that a steering committee and governing board will oversee the proposed King County Regional Homelessness Authority.The steering committee confirms governing board members and has budget authority. The governing board hires, fires, and reviews performance of an executive director and provides guidance, management and oversite of the King County Regional Homeless Authority. We are concerned with the lack of notification. We became aware of the press conference via live social media feeds alter the cress cooferef-)ce hod begun. Though members of the SCA were present on stage at this press conference, the SCA President, Vice President and Mayor Ferrell, a board member, were not aware of the proposal,though the proposed structure has a role for this organization that represents King County cities. Due to the overwhelming presence of SCA representatives at this highly publicized event and the inclusion of SCA representation in the governing structure, the appearance was given that SCA had already taken a policy position on this issue and is fully behind this proposition. However, at the time, the SCA board and Public Issues Committee had yet to take an official position on the creation of a Regional Homelessness Authority in King County. We are also concerned with the absence of collaboration on an initiative regarding one of the significant issues facing our region. The proposal includes a Charter authorizing the creation of a new Public Development Authority (PDA) and an Interlocal Agreement (ILA). Our city did not have input on the Charter nor the ILA, a critical mechanism for cities to participate. Prior to the press conference, the drafts of the Charter and Interlocal Agreement had not been officially shared with the City of Federal Way. In addition, representation of King County cities appears to be disproportionate. In summary, the proposed creation of an agency as large and encompassing as a Public Development Authority occurred without consultation, especially regarding the critical area of how other King County cities would be represented. The appropriate representation of the unique needs of cities in the proposed governing board and steering committee structure is essential. We are sharing this letter with Mayors of all cities in King County. We look forward to a dialogue as this initiative moves forward. Sincerely, Mayor Jim Ferrell Deputy Mayor Susan Honda Councilmember Lydia Assefa-Dawson Councilmember Jesse Johnson Councilmember Hoang Tran Councilmember Mark Koppang Councilmember Martin Moore Councilmember Dini Duclos cc: SCA Board of Directors COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 7a CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE:RELATING TO SNOW AND ICE POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council approve the ordinance to add new sections to Federal Way Revised Code related to Snow and Ice? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: September 9, 2019 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ® Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Desiree Winkler,P.E. Deputy Public Works Director DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance Options Considered: 1. Approve the proposed ordinance. 2. Reject the proposed ordinance and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMEND: ION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: `I �1 5' DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �✓ B X30(<1 ,or itt Co cil it Initial/Date InoLiaUDate Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on September 17, 2019. X11 Mark Koppang,Committee Chair Jes son,Committee Member 1-Ioang Tran, ommittee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE(SEPTEMBER 17,2019): "I move to forward approval of the ordinance to the October 1, 2019 Council Meetingfor enactment." SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE(OCTOBER 1,2019): "I move approval of the proposed ordinance." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: City Council VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor /� FROM: EJ Walsh, P.E.,Director of Public Works W Desiree Winkler,P.E., Deputy Public Works Director 1/7, SUBJECT: ORDINANCE: Relating to Snow and Ice FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This Ordinance does not contain financial considerations which propose an impact. BACKGROUND: During the winter of 2018-2019 the City of Federal Way experienced above average snow and ice accumulation which required an atypically large response by the City. Based on those events we have reviewed our Operations Procedures, Standards, City Code, etc. and compared the same to surrounding jurisdictions to be better prepared for future events. During the review of City Code and comparison to surrounding jurisdictions, several deficiencies were identified as well as a need to incorporate several informal policies that the City has operated under for many years. The primary deficiency identified relates to parking and abandoning of vehicles.The City maintains Primary Snow Routes and City Facilities which are critical to the safe operations by emergency personnel as well as mobility for our residents. Parked or abandoned vehicles on these routes impedes city staff's ability to make them accessible and creates a safety risk to both emergency personnel and the general public.This Ordinance codifies requirements,that when deemed necessary, the City may declare and advertise a Snow Alert which allows the Police Department to immediately remove vehicles for the safe and efficient removal of snow and ice from Primary Snow Routes and City Facilities. The City has operated for many years under the informal policy that the City is responsible for removal of snow and ice from streets and city facilities and that it is the duty of the abutting property owner to remove snow and ice from sidewalks.This Ordinance codifies this informal policy. The City has operated for many years under the informal policy that it is prohibited for a private party to dump snow into a public street. An example could be an entity plowing snow from a parking lot into the public street, obstructing traffic. This Ordinance codifies this informal policy. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to declaring winter snow and ice emergencies as Snow Alerts, removal of snow and ice from sidewalks, removal of vehicles from City Primary Snow Routes during declared Snow Alerts, and prohibiting the abandonment of vehicles on City Streets during the same; and adding new sections to Chapters 4.40 and 8.60 FWRC. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way ("City") is a non-charter code city under Title 35A of the Revised Code of Washington ("RCW"); and WHEREAS, FWRC 2.27.030 provides that the Public Works Director or designee shall have charge of and supervision over all City streets; and WHEREAS, winter weather conditions make it necessary and advisable to declare snow emergencies ("Snow Alerts") in order to permit City staff to promptly remove vehicles from the City's Primary Snow Routes that are impeding the proper and efficient removal of snow and application of deicing or traction materials to roadway surfaces; and WHEREAS, vehicles stopped, parked, or left standing on the City's Primary Snow Routes during Snow Alerts obstruct traffic and jeopardize public safety; and WHEREAS, upon public proclamation of a Snow Alert, the Chief of Police and members of the Federal Way Police Department are to summarily impound vehicles if, in the discretion of the Public Works Director, or designee, the Chief of Police, or a member of the Federal Way Police Department, a vehicle stopped, parked, or left standing on a Primary Snow Route constitutes an obstruction to traffic or jeopardizes public safety by impeding the removal of snow or the application of appropriate deicing or traction materials on Primary Snow Routes; and Ordinance No. 19-,- Page I of 6 WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary to clarify and formalize current practices and responsibilities for snow removal from sidewalks abutting City streets and property. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 4.40 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 4.40.040 to read as follows: 4.40.040 Cleari►ig of Snow. It shall be the duty of the property owner, lessee, or occupant of property abutting or bordering ani+Lh-,VJV. �,trzet, 4ivenue, or public 111acc. to r21110v e Or cause to be removed all snow and ice fron) the M firont of or- 'IIdiacent tosuchtlrol_1criv to the full width of said sidewalk within 24 hours after such snow or ice has accumulated thereon. Section 2. Chapter 4.40 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 4.40.050 to read as follows: 4.40.050 Dumping snow in street prohibited. It is unlawful for any person, by any means, to scrape, plow.pile,dii lv bush, or dejsit snow on. into, or upon any city street, right-of-way, or traffic si!n; ri-oyided. however, this chaptel- neither prevents the removal of snow_from public sidewalks, nor prohibits the city's snow removal or street maintenance operations. Section 3. Chapter 4.40 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 4.40.080 to read as follows: Ordinance No. 19- Page 2 of 6 4.40.080 Violation - Penalty. A violation of thus chapter is a Class 3 civil infraction and will be enforecd ,ts set lu1-111 it] C I1',111(cr 7.80 RCW. Each day a violation continues is a separate offense. Section 4. Title 8 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 8.60 to read as follows: Chapter 8.60 Snow Alerts and vehicle removal from city streets. 8.60.010 Snow Alert. A Snow Alert may be decl trc(l by the ptiblic works director or designee in the event that snow or ice accumulates or is forecasted to accumulate within city limits and when, in the sole discretion of the public works director or designee, vehicles ,tk_1hj,cd. parked, or left standing on Primary Snow Routes would impede the propor and efficient retnok-:il of sno\v application of deicina or traction inatcri,lls it) I-o'ul\v,Iv A S11(m alert ,IiAl 1)c distributed by the city's public information uf'ficcr. 8.60.020 Primary Snow Routes. The purpose of designating Prirntary Siww KOLltc'S into allow the citvto peris>rm unirti pet ded snow and ice removal operations during and following the declaration of a Snow Alert. All Primary Snow Routes shall be designated and posted on the city's website and may be revised as deemed necessary by the public works director. Primary Snow Routes shall include the entire width of the public right-of-way, which includes, but is not limited to any portion of the Primary Snow Route orirnarily used for the movement of vehicles or pedestrian traffic (e.g_ the travelwav and anv abutting shoulder). Any Snow Alert must include a reference to where the Primary Snow haute,, can be found. Ordinance No. 19- Page 3 of 6 8.60.30 Vehicle prohibitions during Snow Alert. Vehicles stopped, parked, or left standing, upon any roadways desippiated as Primary Snow Routes shall be prohibited from the time a Snow Alert goes into effect until the Snow Alert is terminated by the public works director or designee. 8.60.40 Stopped,parked, or left standing vehicles—removal by police authorized. A. During a declined Snow Alert, mcinbers of the Federal Way Police Department are authorized to remove, or have removed, any vehicle from Primary Snow Routes to a place of safety when any part of the vehicle is stopped, parked, or left standing on any portion of a Primary Snow Route during a Snow Alert. For the purposes of this section, a place of safety includes the business location of a registered tow truck operator. B. Whenever a member of the police department removes, or has removed, a vehicle from a Primary Snow Route as authorized in this chapter. the notice requirements of Chapter 46.55 RCW shall apply. C. This section shall be suziLALirrczrtal ulyd in addition to any other provisions of law granting members of the police department authority to remove motor vehicles. 8._60.50 Stopped,^parked, or left standing vehicles _. leaving in roadvw"prohibited. During a declared Snow Alert, wli neves- i VC11ICiC becon7es stopped, parked, or left standing far any reason, whether or not in violation of this chapter, within any travelway on ally city street on which there is a covering of snow, sleet, or ice, the person operating such vehicle shall take immediate action to have the vehicle towed or removed from the roadv ay. No person shall stow, park, or leave standing a vehicle in the roadway of a street. _regardless of whether the person indicates that the vehicle is stalled, except for the purpose of securing assistance durin.? the Ordinance No. 19- Page 4 of 6 actual time necessary to go to .i iie. -Laves?l i_cc to gain assist'llicc "AAI(! retuc-ti �a il.lic�til di l.a . Vehicles that are parked entirely witliiii desic-mated pat-kin;(y vire is c)tI public streets not classified as a Primary Snow Route are exempt from this section. Section S. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance, or its application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Sectioii 7. 1ZttliFjcLm011. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of 20 [signature page follows] Ordinance No. 19- Page 5 of 6 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: JIM FERRELL, MAYOR ATTEST: STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. RYAN CALL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 19- Page 6 of 6 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 7b CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE:ORDINANCE TO RENEW THE NORTH LAKE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2 AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE DISTRICT POLICY QUESTION: Should Council adopt an Ordinance to renew the North Lake Management District Number 2 and set a public hearing on the assessment roll for the district? COMMITTEE: Land Use&Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: September 9,2019 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ® Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Leah Myhre, Water Quality Coordinator LW\ DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Proposed Ordinance Options Considered: 1. Adopt the proposed Ordinance. 2. Do not adopt the proposed Ordinance and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMEND ION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: S l9 / S c�DIRECTOR APPROVAL: Cunni ttcc Cauncil Initial/Date l I1n laliDaie COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on September 17, 2019. Mark Kopp i-i.L Committee Chair JeAe.folmsoii, Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE(DATE): "I move to forward approval of the ordinance to the October 1, 2019 Council Meeting for enactment. " SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE(DATE): "I move approval of the proposed ordinance." _ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERIC'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: Land Use &Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: EJ Walsh, P.E., Public Works Director 'L� Leah Myhre, Water Quality Coordinator L4v\ SUBJECT: Ordinance to Renew the North Lake Management District Number 2 and Set a Public Hearing on the Assessment Roll for the District FINANCIAL IMPACTS: North Lake Management District Number 2(NLMD)activities are funded through the collection of special assessments that will be collected annually. These assessments are collected from property owners having properties adjacent to North Lake with lakefront footage or with deeded lake access. All City of Federal Way staff activities related to the NLMD are funded through these assessments,and thus will have no direct financial impacts on the City. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: After 10 years of successful lake management, 2019 will bring to a close the existing North Lake Management District Number 2 (NLMD) (2010-2019). The NLMD provides an organizational structure and funding mechanism that allows for proactive lake management activities focusing on the protection and enhancement of water quality, recreational use, and aesthetic value of North Lake. NLMD Advisory Committee members and other affected property owners are interested in renewing the NLMD for another 10-year period (2020-2029). At the May 21,2019 City Council meeting,a public hearing date concerning the reformation of the NLMD was set for July 16,2019,and a resolution of intent to reform the NLMD was adopted.Following the public hearing on July 16,2019, City Council adopted a resolution to renew the NLMD and call for a vote by the affected property owners on the renewal of the proposed district. Ballots were mailed out on July 31, 2019 based on criteria in RCW 36.61.080.Valid ballots were tabulated after the voting deadline of 5:00 P.M. on August 23, 2019. Pursuant to RCW 36.61.090, a simple majority of votes cast determines whether or not the proposed lake management district is approved. The proposed NLMD is approved with a final vote count of 7,566 in favor, and 125 against. (Votes are weighted by the proposed annual assessment for each property owner; i.e.,one vote per assessment dollar to be paid, pursuant to RCW 36.61.090.) The next step in the process of renewing the NLMD is the adoption of an Ordinance to renew the NLMD and set a public hearing on the assessment roll for the district. Following adoption of the Ordinance, an assessment roll will be created, published,and sent to the affected parties.A public hearing will be held on November 5, 2019 to receive public comment on the proposed assessments. After the public hearing, resolutions establishing the assessment roll and North Lake Advisory Committee will be brought before City Council for consideration. The adoption of an Ordinance establishing the time of payment, interest, and penalties for assessments will then be brought before Council for consideration. The final step in the renewal process is the selection and appointment of the North Lake Management District Advisory Committee. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way,Washington, relating to the renewal of the North Lake Management District Number 2 and setting a public hearing on the assessment roll for the district. WHEREAS,on April 16,2019,the City of Federal Way City Council received a petition for the renewal of the North Lake Management District Number 2 pursuant to RCW 35.21.403 and Chapter 36.61 RCW,and passed Resolution Number 19-754,declaring its intent to renew the North Lake Management District Number 2 and setting a public hearing on the renewal of the proposed district for May 21, 2019; and WHEREAS, the public hearing notice requirements of Chapter 36.61 RCW relating to the public hearing scheduled for May 21, 2019 were not met; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2019, the City of Federal Way City Council passed Resolution Number 19-758, declaring its intent to renew the North Lake Management District Number 2 and setting a public hearing on the renewal of the proposed district for July 16, 2019; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2019, the City of Federal Way City Council passed Resolution Number 19-764, declaring its intent to renew the North Lake Management District Number 2 and calling for a vote by affected property owners on the renewal of the proposed district; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way City Council conducted a public hearing on July 16, 2019 for the purpose of accepting testimony in support of and in opposition to the renewal of North Lake Management District Number 2. At the public hearing,testimony in favor of the renewal was provided by the Chair of the current North Lake Management District Advisory Committee; and Ordinance No. 19- Page I of 6 WHEREAS, at the public hearing on July 16, 2019, there was no testimony given in opposition to the renewal of North Lake Management District Number 2; and WHEREAS, the North Lake Management District Number 2 is created for the purpose of generating revenue to provide ongoing aquatic vegetation management, water quality monitoring, community education, and other related projects; and WHEREAS, under RCW 36.61.090, a simple majority of the votes cast shall determine whether the proposed lake management district shall be approved or rejected; and WHEREAS,the ballots were tabulated on August 23,2019 at 5:00 P.M.,and the proposal to renew the North Lake Management District Number 2 has been approved by at least a simple majority of the votes cast; and WHEREAS,the ballots cast are available for public inspection at City of Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, Washington; and WHEREAS,the City of Federal Way desires to renew the North Lake Management District Number 2 and proceed with special assessments and performing lake improvement activities; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way has established that the 2004 North Lake Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan ("IAVMP") and subsequent Annual Reports (2005-2018) (together the "Plan") form the basis for the annual Lake Management District work plans and management goals; and WHEREAS, the hearing notice requirements of Chapter 36.61 RCW will provide an opportunity to evaluate the assessment roll for each property within the district. Ordinance No. 19- Page 2 of 6 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS. Section 1. Renewal of District.The North Lake Management District Number 2("District") is hereby renewed. The boundaries of the District encompass all properties adjacent to North Lake with lakefront footage or with deeded lake access as represented in Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference. The duration of the District shall be for ten (10) years, from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2029. Special assessments totaling $15,288.00 will be collected annually to finance District activities, with the total amount to be collected during the life of the District estimated at being$192,290.82,which includes an automatic inflation increase based upon the Seattle Consumer Price Index, not to exceed five percent in any given year. The proposed rate structure is based on equal charges for similar parcels. Undeveloped parcels with lakefront footage (RS9.6) will be charged$0.85 per lakefront foot per year. Single family developed parcels (RS9.6)will be charged $125.00 per year. Non-lakefront single family developed parcels (RS9.6) with deeded lake access will be charged$90.00 per year. Commercial property(CP-1)with lakefront footage will be charged $1.00 per lakefront foot per year. The Department of Fish and Wildlife parcel with a public boat launch will be charged $4,000.00 per year. Unallocated funds left in the current North Lake Management District Number 2 (estimated to be $14,000 at the end of 2019)will roll over into the renewed North Lake Management District Number 2. Section 2. Publication.Within ten(10)days of adoption of this Ordinance,the City of Federal Way shall publish,in a newspaper of general circulation in North Lake Management District Number Ordinance No. 19- Page 3 of 6 2, a notice indicating that this Ordinance has been adopted. Section 3. Creation of District Limitations on Appeals. Pursuant to RCW 36.61.110, no lawsuit may be maintained challenging the jurisdiction of authority of the City of Federal Way's legislative authority to proceed with lake improvement and maintenance activities and creating the lake management district, or in any way challenging the validity of the actions or decisions of any proceedings relating to the actions or decision unless the lawsuit is served and filed no later than forty (40) days after publication of a notice that the ordinance has been adopted ordering the lake improvement and maintenance activities and creating the lake management district.Written notice of the appeal shall be filed with the City Council and Clerk of the Superior Court in King County. Section 4. Special Assessment Roll to be Prepared.Upon passage of this Ordinance,the City of Federal Way shall cause to be prepared a proposed special assessment roll in accordance with Chapter 36.61 RCW. Section 5. Public Hearin .A public hearing will be held by the Federal Way City Council on November 5,2019 at 6:30 P.M. or shortly thereafter at the City of Federal Way City Hall,33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, Washington. At the public hearing, the City of Federal Way City Council will consider the objections to the special assessment roll of the District,shall act as a board of equalization, and may correct,revise,raise, lower, change, or modify the special assessment roll or any part thereof, or set the proposed special assessment roll aside and order a new proposed special assessment roll to be prepared. The City of Federal Way City Council shall confirm and approve a special assessment roll by adoption of a resolution. Notice of the proposed special Ordinance No. 19- Page 4 of 6 assessment,the procedure for filing written objections thereto,and notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to the taxpayers of record of all properties within the District by the City of Federal Way pursuant to RCW 36.61.140. Section 6. Severability. Should any section,subsection,paragraph,sentence,clause,or phrase of this ordinance,or its application to any person or situation,be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses,phrase,or portion thereof,irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections, sentences, clauses,phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 7. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 8.Ratification.Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty(30) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of , 20 [signatures to follow] Ordinance No. 19- Page 5 of 6 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: JIM FERRELL, MAYOR ATTEST: STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. RYAN CALL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 19- Page 6 of 6 Ta CU }� C N O U VfU 15 m N 0 •Lo o U4.0 ) d Y > T N Q o m a� r _ n w a c n N N o N _ Q a Z a O LL c U C r O L .. LO m Na > L 3 W t0 t9 J l6 C m C _ J N 0 N-p 63 O J U') 0) y LL W may/ v 3 . "a 0- m Na M WI m m c Un N = E ° X � . W v3 . ww -0 E N p F ,�rrM = Y E Ey E E �� vWl.r o LL ii r ii o a s O CM c m m v m c U Q v m a CL 'a C) m in a U) ° 4? .N o C c4 CL U �Z A E U m ca a N J �F- N s Id 1SLV u S ld lW sy m N pec s N N S AV H18V S AV H18b S AV HIft 39Saoe y��s a 39TH AVE S Z g 0 ' S AV HUec SAV HLK 38TH AVE 5 38TH AVE S F w s a t w S AV HIS¢ ' O ' 3 V ' 8��bCC 3 3 e °brr S ? �Sn3dHd13A3M i S.{M if3sn3�.Nb3�� 9 AY H,a S{J _ 5 WEYERHAEUSER 9� ro6�a A 0 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 17,2019 ITEM#: 7c CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE: Amending the rate structure for the Storm and Surface Water Utility. POLICY QUESTION: 1. Should City Council approve the ordinance to amend the Surface Water Management Utility Rate Structure? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: Sep 9, 2019 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Theresa Thurlow, P.E.. SWM Division Managet..�A--I DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance Options Considered: 1. Approve the proposed ordinance. 2. Do not approve the proposed ordinance and provide direction to Staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the September 17, 2019 City Council consent agenda or approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: Cf' `j S DIRECTOR APPROVAL: '`` 9 311 i ' C muni cc counci Initial/Date Initial/ ate Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on September 17, 2019. V i p�noN e 'G% Mark Koppang, Committee Chair Se,Johnson, Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE(SEPTEMBER 17,2019): `I move to forward approval of the ordinance to the October 1, 2019 Council Meeting far enactment. " SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE(OCTOBER 1,2019): "I move approval of the proposed ordinance. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances ont}) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION 4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9,2019 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor EJ Walsh, P.E.,Public Works Directorq FROM: Theresa Thurlow, P.E., Surface Water Division Manager 4j'1�`�' SUBJECT: ORDINANCE: Amending the Storm and Surface Water Utility Rate Structure FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Under the current SWM Utility rate and rate structure,2019 Rate revenues are approximately$4.4 million. Operational expenditures for 2019 are estimated to be $4.2 million and expenditures for 2020 are expected to be$4.3 million. The remaining revenue available for capital improvements is$100,000 in 2020. As a result,the SWM Utility is currently covering operating costs with little to no annual revenues available for on-going capital projects. In addition, a recent gap analysis done by a SWM Consultant determined that additional operating expenses will be needed to meet the newly issued National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)Phase II permit requirements. Without an increase in the rate, capital projects and SWM program operations will draw down reserves starting in 2020. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On June 20,2017, City Council approved the 2017 SWM CIP Update. One of the approved projects included a programmatic study—304-3100-287: SWM Comp Plan/CIP Update and Rate Study. The scope of work for the study included: 1. Review the current Surface Water Management(SWM)capital program and identify capital needs through 2026; 2. Review the newly issued 2019-2024 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)Phase II permit and identify gaps in the current SWM program necessary to meet the permit requirements; 3. Analyze the SWM Utility rate structure and annual service charge to determine if the current annual rate requires adjustment to adequately fund SWM Utility requirements. Results of the utility rate structure analysis determined that revenue is currently covering operational expenses with little funding available for capital projects. As such,the SWM Utility needs to consider a rate increase. Another outcome of work done by the Consultant was a proposed change to the utility rate structure from Density of Development to an Equivalent Service Unit system. This proposed change was previously presented to Council in February 2019. The current SWM Rate structure was conceived in 1996 and is based on a range of percent impervious surface per gross area of each parcel, referred to as density of development. Each parcel falls into a flat rate that is divided into seven classes: residential,very light,moderate, moderate heavy,heavy,very heavy, and streets. While this rate structure does consider the amount of impervious surface, it does not adequately correlate the impact of impervious surface to the stormwater drainage system. In addition, this September 9,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Ordinance:Amending the Storm and Surface Water Utility Rate Structure Page 2 structure perpetuates inequities among customers at the extreme ends of each class range. For example, a non-residential property that is 19% impervious would pay significantly less than a similarly sized property that is 21% impervious, even though they have comparable amounts of impervious area. The consultant recommended that the City change to a more commonly used approach to stormwater utility rates,the Equivalent Service Unit,which administers charges based on actual impervious surface area. SWM Staff concurred with this approach and provided a briefing to Council in February 2019 to determine if this approach could be considered under the rate structure analysis and incorporation into the amended ordinance. For the financial analysis of the rate structure,the Consultant utilized the current financial status of the SWM Utility,the updated CIP plan,the gap analysis done under this project to identify programmatic needs in order to fully meet NPDES Phase II permit requirements, and the goals and policies set forth when the utility was established. The gap analysis provided three levels of service: minimum level, moderate level, and enhanced level. The Consultant was asked to run four scenarios to determine the SWM Rate structure necessary to meet requirements and goals of the SWM Utility. Each scenario was run under the current rate structure and the updated Equivalent Service Unit approach. Results are included in Attachment 1. The scenarios for each approach are: Scenario 1: Minimum level of service with Priority Capital projects from the updated CIP plan incorporated. Scenario 2: Minimum level of service with the full updated CIP plan incorporated: Scenario 3: Moderate level of service with Priority Capital projects from the updated CIP plan incorporated. *Scenario 4: Moderate level of service with full updated CIP plan incorporated. *Recommended scenario. RECOMMENDATIAN Based on the work done by the Consultant,the recommendation is to amend the SWM Utility Rate Structure ordinance, Attachment 2, as follows: 1. Discontinue the tiered structure for the SWM Utility fee and change to the Equivalent Service Unit rate structure. 2. Approve Scenario 4 (ESU Approach)rate per ESU to be effective January 2021 through December 2028. 3. Discontinue rate discount for maintenance of stormwater control facilities,private retention/detention ponds, and surface waters that function as stormwater control facilities. (Maintenance of private stormwater drainage infrastructure is a requirement under FWRC 16.35.010 and as such, this current discounted of the SWM Utility fee is not recommended. As the SWM Utility fee is determined by impervious surface, this current discount does not have a correlation to the impact on the drainage system) 4. Identify which City owned or leased parcels provide direct support to the SWM Utility for determination of a SWM Utility fee waiver on those parcels. 5. Incorporate a maximum allowed rate adjustment of 50%of the assessed SWM Utility fee on parcels owned or leased by a public-school district. NOTE: Another recommendation under the SWM rate study was to add a System Development Charge (SDC). This recommendation is not included within the update of this ordinance. As this fee is to be September 9, 2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Ordinance: Amending the Storm and Surface Water Utility Rate Structure Page 3 included within the 2020 City of Federal Way Fee Schedule and requires changes to FWRC 19 Division III, Mitigation and Fees, it will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration in October 2019. $o m St s X R X s « �3 0 - r e » � w» »»t9 . »»« � s $ N t9 s X «w»Dvi www «�� 4 fs F2 A Aa2 _ X a » «« w or ryry �+ w S w w$ �. Nze CL � LL Q R x zg s q X m - - w»pe S»»»» . x w n r X $ g o 2z R« X 8 o X X ae h � P' mo X ^' Yis o, yt9Egso s ey^ me S g - X - S - « ZE e a <' w w W w w gee AU g ,y�e o O — rg f c� m �. ��Q � ��a •mc & o c � m?�$a ?a •mc �. d m V h H d� N dr M dU a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington, relating to changing the policy and rate structure for the Storm and Surface Water Utility; amending FWRC 11.40.030, 11.40.100, 11.45.010, 11.45.020, 11.45.030, and 11.45.070; repealing FWRC 11.40.050, 11.40.080, and 11.40.090; and adding a new section to Chapter 11.40 FWRC. (Amending Ordinance Nos. 14-775, 07-571, 06-544, 02-433, 96-277, 91- 117, and 90-32) WHEREAS,Chapter 35.67 RCW authorizes the City to establish a Storm Water Utility;and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way established a Storm and Surface Water Utility by Ordinance 90-32; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council also established the Storm and Surface Water Utility policy by Ordinance 90-32 to determine a methodology for assessing utility charges; and WHEREAS,the Federal Clean Water Act prohibits discharge ofpollutants into waters of the United States (WOTUS); and WHEREAS,the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit program was created by the Clean Water Act to address water pollution by regulating discharges to WOTUS; and WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency authorizes State governments to implement the NPDES program; and WHEREAS, the State of Washington Water Pollution Control Law, Chapter 90.48 RCW, regulates discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewers (MS4s)through the issuance of an NPDES and State Waste Discharge General Municipal Stormwater Permit, referred to as the NPDES Permit; and Ordinance No. 19- Page I of 14 WHEREAS, all operators of regulated MS4s are required to apply for and obtain coverage under the NPDES permit; and WHEREAS,the Storm and Surface Water Utility is operated by the City of Federal Way and is a regulated MS4; and WHEREAS, the Storm and Surface Water Utility is responsible for meeting all NPDES Permit requirements,which allows for discharge of water collected within the utility's infrastructure to WOTUS; and WHEREAS, the Storm and Surface Water Utility must also comply with state mandated Underground Utility Damage Prevention Act (Call Before You Dig) requirements pursuant to Chapter 19.122 RCW; and WHEREAS,in response to the continuing need to comply with NPDES Permit and Chapter 19.122 RCW utility locate requirements, the City reexamines its practices on a regular basis to determine whether the existing policies and rate structure adequately support meeting federal and state mandates; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council amended the rate structure of the Storm and Surface Water Utility by Ordinance Nos. 91-117, 02-433, and 14-775 to adequately support the necessary maintenance, operations, and capital improvement of the surface and storm water management system; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council amended the rate structure of the Storm and Surface Water Utility by Ordinance No. 96-277 to include a utility tax to fund a transportation bond levied on the provision of utility services within the City; and Ordinance No. 19- Page 2 of 14 WHEREAS,the Storm and Surface Water Utility conducted an evaluation of the rate and rate structure in 2019 and determined that the current rate structure does not adequately fund the 2019-24 NPDES Permit requirements and 2020-27 Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, the rate structure developed under Ordinance 90-32 was based on tiers of percent impervious surface area; and WHEREAS, the 2019 evaluation of the rate and rate structure identified inequities among customers at the extreme ends of each tiers; and WHEREAS, the 2019 evaluation of the rate structure recommended a new approach that would assess charges based on actual impervious surface area expressed as an Equivalent Service Unit (ESU); and WHEREAS, one ESU shall be equal to the average amount of impervious surface area on single-family residential detached dwelling unit parcels within the City of Federal Way; and WHEREAS,the City conducted an analysis isolating all single-family detached dwelling unit residential parcels in the database and applied a random number generator equation to all these parcels in order to generate a random parcel list from which the average impervious surface area was calculated; and WHEREAS, the value of the average impervious surface area of single-family residential detached dwelling unit parcels was calculated to be 3,200 square feet; and WHEREAS,under the ESU system,the Storm and Surface Water Utility charge assessed to all other parcels,i.e.,non-single-family detached dwelling unit residential and commercial parcels,is based on the measured actual impervious surface area, expressed as a number of ESUs and calculated as a dollar amount per ESU; and Ordinance No. 19- Page 3 of 14 WHEREAS, adequate and appropriate rates are necessary for the operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of failing infrastructure, as well as capital improvements of the storm and surface water management system; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council finds it is in the best interest of the citizens to change the utility rate policy and structure as outlined in Chapters 11.40 and 11.45 FWRC,effective January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2028, to fully and adequately support the City's Storm and Surface Water Utility needs and to calculate rates and charges using a more equitable methodology. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. FWRC 11.40.030 is hereby amended to read as follows: 11.40.030 Developed properties. It is the finding of the city that developed properties contribute to an increase in surface and stormwater runoff to the surface and stormwater management system. i.e., the cjtv's MS4. This increase in surface and stormwater runoff results in the need to establish rates and charges to finance the city's activities in stormwater and surface water management. Developed properties shall be subject to the rates and charges of the surface water management utility based on their contribution to increased runoff. The factors to be used to determine the degree of increased surface and stormwater runoff to the surface and stormwater management system from a particular parcel shall be based oiithe pi-eefitat�e-t)('impervious surface -,area expressed as TcuivLilem Service units, as defined in FWRC the tet�c4 Section ?. Chapter 11.40 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 11.40.035 to read as follows: 07"di)Wnce No. 19- Page 4 of 14 11.40.035 Equivalernt Service Units_ It is the finding of the city that the rate structure developed under Ordinance 90-321 was based on tiers of percent impervious surface area and does not adequately correlate the impact of impervious surface to the stormwater draina a system and the rate structure perpetuates inequities among customers at the extreme ends of each tier;therefore the Storm and Surface Water Utilitv char<,c will he haled c,n acwaI iinpervioti:s surface area c..\pr sscd as an Ijquivalent Service Unit(ESU). �t1 L wL s17�t11 1)c equal to the,n��ra�e ��m�utnt r ( inih �imI'S 5t[I-Iacc�IFCJ 011 �ir�� l��Iiin:iI ]usidCntial parcck\vltlii>>tlie City ofFederal Way. Impervious surface area includes thes]n L,1c Ia1lIIv re idencc. drip ew,i}. iv ilk\v.m paved areas. and other surfaces that do not allo\v penetration of stormwater runoff into the ground. The ESU value for the City of Federal Way has been calculated to be 3,200 square feet. Section 3. FWRC 11.40.050 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 4. FWRC 11.40.080 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 5. FWRC 11.40.090 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section G. FWRC 11.40.100 is hereby amended to read as follows: 11.40.100 Road systems. It is a finding of the city that city,county and state roads contribute a significant amount of increased runoff to the surface and stormwater management system, which contributes to the need for basin planning, storm drainage control facilities and other related services. However, the city and county roads and state highway programs provide substantial annual programs for the construction and maintenance of storm drainage control facilities, and the roads systems and their associated storm drainage facilities serve as an integral part of the surface and stormwater management system. The Ordinance No. 19- Page 5 of 14 rate charged city and county roads and state highways shall reflect the benefit which city and county roads and state highway facilities provide to the surface and stormwater management system and therefore will exclude any system costs associated with capital improvements and on-site retention/detention facility maintenance.The pe.-eenta e of impepAaus r uff ee^ave ge fe f^i*f-and county foads and state highwa)-3 shall be ealefflated by dividing avemge Widih af r-eadway and "tElth-of the fight of way- kEeehaFzgo?-shall be detefl,,:. ed t... -ice tai °:, ,_. of read and Ng ,, ay,.ght of,.ray wi4hit,the see ,ice a!,e twies die fate per acre a 1 c n 1 0 tl,.-r,.,..1, 1 1 1� rtiti[t_ Section 7. FWRC 11.45.010 is hereby amended to read as follows; 11.45.010 Basis for rate structure. The see Storm and Surface Water Utility charges shall be based on the relative contribution of increased surface and stormwater runoff from a given parcel to the surface and stormwater management system. ge of II„i)eivionit, 0<<Ifa..�2 :=,i t -t)aittil and the fetal .,,ifef_.} 11 1,e ,k.-.ed to i—,rate the f:eIa4ye,,, Ei44batie__ , i �: a �?i�a �c`�.c �1, 3.. .,;?t ��a.��rv-�rccrrcam-a . Impervious surface area is an appropriate measure of a property's contribution of runoff, and provides a rational nexus to service received from a surface water maria ement progam,therefore,the Storm and Surface Water Utility charge shall be based on impervious surface area. The relative contribution of increased surface and stormwater runoff from each parcel determines that parcel's share of the service charge revenue needs. The service charge revenue needs of the utility are based upon all or any part, as determined by the council, of the cost and expense within the service area of maintaining and operating stormwater control facilities, all or any part of the cost and expense of planning, designing, Ordinance No. 19- Page 6 or 14 establishing,acquiring,development,constructing and improving any of such facilities,or to pay or secure the payment of all or any portion of any issue of general obligation or revenue bonds issued for such purpose. Section 8. FWRC 11.45.020 is hereby amended to read as follows: 11.45.020 Methodology for determining service charge. The public works director shall determine the Storm and Surface Water Utilitysefviee charge for each parcel within the service area by the following methodology: (1) SIrigle-family residential detached dwelling unit parcels: The utility shall impose a uniform rate on parcels with a sHiLdc-family residential detached dwelling unit use for the reasons set forth in Chapter 11.40 FWRC, and because tracking_parcel-specific measurements of impervious area for single-family residential detached dwelling units would add considerable administrative effort and complexity to the rate structure, the rate shall be based on an estimated average amount of impervious surf.Ice dl-ca. This average amount of impervious surface area shall be represented by a sinL,lz Eduiv, lent Sen Ice-[ nit I St i I. U,,Mn�-, a random sampling of sin,-,lc l�m�ily dc�aehecl�iwellin unit parcels within the City, it has been determined that the average impervious surface area of single-family residential detached dwelling unit within the City of Federal Way to be 3,200 square feet;therefore,the value of a single ESU is determined to be 3,200 square feet of impervious surface area. To qualify for the charge set forth in this subsection, the single-family residential detached dwelling unit use must be the primary use on the parcel,as determined by the lie public works director, and not accessory to any other use on the parcel.Residefitia! and rery ligh! fienfesidential pareels shall i:eeeive a flat rate sen,iee ehar-ge for-the Feasens set forth in Chaptef 11. 10 PAI Ordinance No. 19- Page 7 of 14 (2) A!l ulli r ixii-cels: The charge basis for all other parcels, i.e., those parcels that do not qualifyfor the charge described in subsection (1) of this section, will be measured by the actual impervious surface area,eNpressed as a number ofESUs.The rate will be calculated as a dollar amoui-it per ESU as set forth in FWRC 11.45.030. ) . (3) Land use codes and data collected from parcel investigations will be used to determine each parcel's p_#eeatage of impervious surface areaeov-e�. (4) After-a par-. l has_been naass igii,4-te-tlte-aa13pFo,, :ate ate eategei=y,the sei-vice..a,afge f y-the p.,fee will be ealeuWed by mukipl�4n-, die total qereat�e of flie pareel timeq the fate fi3r-that ea;egofy. Section 9. FWRC 11.45.030 is hereby amended to read as follows: 11.45.030 Service area annual service charge. There is hereby imposed upon all developed properties an annual Storm and 4> r_ \V {i r l i I i i 1 cliarL, basE t] or ll-ie methodology in FWRC 11.45.020 ,expressed as a number of ESUs multiplied by the rate area ^' sep.,iee ...ti..ar-ge f: ''^' < as follows: In., . v u M„ 'Annual Rate per ESU "(Excluding Utility Tax) $140.54 $153-18 5166-97 $182.00 $198.38 $216.23 $235.69 $256.90 '"" t and Gaunt or State Highways N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This table shall be in effect starting January 1, 2021 through December 3.1, 2028_ Ordinance No. 19- Page 8 of 14 7:5 � k 4 �T` (7 T�ATT�� cj�c 'iii$t'erT TT Y'"VA $7n� $6.12 (P) Light ELS 10 20-0A S 17 8.9 8 e n s $13.87 Pete( 20 450A $3 A) Mader-ate N)14 24--4-5-OA e 4,� $31 Head 65 850A $891.19 '7 $69 t4ea=�r-fi 63 5 ; aQ� ' "n' A Nler-y hem,y 85I�r/a $1,166.064A) $90 C-.iiy or ceunty 1.0ad NA NA NA State h ighways NA NA * Rate expressed in dollars per Equivalent Service Unit (ESU) - Parcels with a primarti' residential dct tall,:! dwelling unit use = I ESU regardless of impervious area. All rltltcr parccls. i_c.. 11,H-CCI; WithOLI( a j)rinrarA, sill'-de-larnily hed (kti( ; unit use= 1 ESU per 3,200 impervious square feet. ** The rate shown does not include the City of Federal Waytitility tax assessed on the total charge. Ordinance No. 19- Puck 9 of 14 The total Storni and Slii{:li:e W<lIe!- 1_Ilkllll I C:li:ll tiLItiIi5171c! lti c�;lclkl:;Iecl :is I{711[}11.": (Annual Rate x total ESU(s)) + City Utility Tax assessed on the total char * Par-Gel : d4,��. 94.36.381, ilie parcof -,hall be e ..t &e ffl the SeffViEe „h., gt Tl,.it3� H: ^.1' ti f ��.yl f7 s11 h i1- .^ :, 1 s: .. The ` } � .,�t'i-= 04' -Plt-palce-l.i.s;..kil3±iI I'd"l:;l1:;li IIId d"CJ.,i?;;J. E .E f:,�r� �1?#Tn n ,,.�, ,a of the per-eel eha-ged f. Icltt'4-}l !f± it d i irti ie±oE k.:ic ..,, c _' ;4 1ikii-i th:�' ]-I k., k 1..°°_, igned the , (4) The p.,r,,,,1 is - ;.le n, fi and the-par-eel Eneets the definition of open spaee in FWRC 11.3 S.010. Pfapei4j, 4i (_ ) The parcel ig served # t?i =tteii fion of'`ii,,,-.,,.,,.,+n«to the k.,,,. a cl-N '' 41 -ATDr' Ti-tle 16 and maintained.,+the the light rate eategefy qualif-jing undef this divisien shall be ehar-ged -t. the rate ef ene le'Aw ffiw in the fight oategar-y qualifying under this, division shall be chafged '10 per-eent4441w Current I HAt oat=z,- rate „e,- . La,- .tial parcels . .- par-eels -n the --y 1'a-+ „•., �,,,.,1;f-,;.,�_z, � .I : ! i 1,.,f 1z; .t i .d.1..�.1.: r,+ F.f'"+lye .- .,t .�1 .. t ?tLt Tr c}i.i- ., c,,a-:a]i tact i, fir.:,. c IjL is , C'•i`" ±'all" twit- , efeek, lake, pead or-wetland that has beeii idenfified in an adopted til'lilf7cl 1 E': i ;_..r .,,;d, I +1,,+ +1,e pareel ,,,,, r , _. . . f)r�.,31r_.-.:,��t,t;•,�-„ 1, ,a ,,1,x,11 �-'t r}1�1��t-i:�,-cii]}3 t :.�kii Ftiitia rii.�c i�lE cs::ti-��}•Talc ail�':-�- � bQ `�-vn l+cd I t± t`taiFE}i-itis it E itiiii]tl tit3 itii Era-lei- ?k 3 ttf ion (5)-olLd-i-is section. HoweveF, paFeek ('lii:,IIf',lil,� :lili�'.i=41:i tt11tH � } Er?t� �t:y:_j_{�.� 1��l ccCtr � R c1♦11i iye only one rate class .3;._.,.�,,,,-,+ k whiche;o;er is the gy-ea!eF; (7) A par-eel is divided by the boundary of the se, and the iffipef-viaus stif&ees of the pai Ordinance No. 19- Page 11 o -14 r+ [T: t-lie r-3 : atid (39) A parcel is divided by the boundary of the service area, and the impervious surfaces of the parcel are outside of the service area,and the drainage from the parcel is outside of the service area; and impeniotts surfaces which dr-ain into the ge.-vice (49) The rate or service charge is otherwise erroneous in applying the terms of this division; (5:A) A parcel is served by a stormwater treatment facility which holds a current national pollutant discharge elimination system(NPDES)permit under the authority of the Clean Water Act of 1982, Section 402,specifically for the treatment of stormwater from the parcel and such system discharges directly into Puget Sound,without in any way utilizing any other stormwater conveyance or storage facilities. Parcels qualifying hereunder will be charged only for the area of impervious surface not served by the stormwater treatment facility and at the Fate based upon the •' 1 A14ion of the pafee4; (64) A parcel is owned or leased by a public school district ander provides activities dlatNvli" directly benefit the surface water management utility.The activities may include curriculum specific to the issues and problems of surface water management,and student activities in the community to expose students to the efforts required to restore,monitor or enhance the surface water management system. The amount of the rate adjustment shall be determined by the public works director based upon the cost of the activities to the school district but not to exceed 5Q percent of the assessed Storm and Surface Water Utility chargethe value of the ae, vi;y to «"-e n ,rf nb atei-manageffien t may.The rate adjustment for the school district activity maybe applied to any parcel in the service Ordinance No. 19- Pa,ue 12 of 14 area which is owned or operated by the school district. Sectioil 11. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance,or its application to any person or situation,be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses,phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 12.Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 13. Ratification.Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 14. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five(5)days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of 20 [signatures to follow] Ordinance No. 19- Page 13 of 14 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: JIM FERRELL, MAYOR ATTEST: STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. RYAN CALL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 19- Page 14 of 14