The URL can be used to link to this page

2019-10-15 Council PKT - Regular 4J14 CITY OF 4M Federal Way Centered on Opportunity CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Council Chambers - City Hall October 15, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation: Domestic Violence Awareness Month — October 2019 b. Proclamation: National Disability Employment Awareness Month c. Arts Commission: Arts Alive Artist Recognition — Chair Daniel Hershman d. Certificates of Appointment— Independent Salary Commission e. 2018 Audit Report— Finance Director Ade Ariwoola f. Mayor's Emerging Issues and Report • Parks&Public Works Snow Crew Kickoff Meeting and Update—Public Works Director EJ Walsh • Report on recent events: FWCCN Souper Supper(10/4); PAEC Gala and Los Lobos Performance (10/5); FUSION Open House, Tall Firs Transitional Housing (10/10); Ribbon Cutting for Brooklake Connector Trail (10/11); Communities in Schools (CIS) Fundraising Breakfast at Todd Beamer HS (10/11) • Upcoming Event:Aerospace Futures Alliance(AFA) 14th Annual Aerospace Summit at the Performing Arts and Event Center on October 16th; Multi-Service Center HELPS Luncheon at Emerald Downs on October 17th g. Council Committee Reports • Finance, Economic Development Regional Affairs Committee (FEDRAC) • Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) • Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) • Parks/Recreation/Human Services/Public Safety Committee (PRHSPS) • Regional Committees Report(PIC) • Deputy Mayor Report 4. CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE A PINK SLIP AND TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. When recognized by the Mayor,come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Please limit your comments to three minutes. The Mayor may interrupt comments that exceed three minutes, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. The City Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. City Council Meetings are wheelchair accessible; and assisted listening devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk. Regular Meetings are recorded and televised live on Government Access Channel 21.To view Council Meetings online please visit www.cityoffederalway.com. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed in their entirety by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval;all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items maybe removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. Minutes: October 1, 2019 Regular and Special Meeting Minutes b. Complete Streets ADA Upgrades — 30% Design Report c. Horizontal Curve Warning Signs - 30% Design Report d. Lakehaven Interlocal Agreement - S Dash Point RD Sidewalk Improvements e. 2019-2021 Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program - Bid Award f. Authorization to Apply for State Department of Commerce Grant in support of developing a City Housing Action Plan (E2SHB 1923 Funds) g. City Hall Front Door Replacement— Contract Award h. Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team (VNET) / U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Task Force Agreements i. RESOLUTION: Encouraging Investments in Affordable Housing and Supporting Housing through Sales Tax in Accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (SHB 1406) 6. PUBLIC HEARING a. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan & 2020 Annual Action Plan • Staff Report: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager & Joseph Adriano, CDBG/Human Services Coordinator • Citizen Comment— 3 minutes • Council Action b. 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice • Staff Report: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager • Citizen Comment— 3 minutes • Council Action c. Ordinance: Encouraging Investments in Affordable Housing and Supporting Housing through Sales Tax in Accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (SHB 1406) —Action will be taken under Ordinance portion of the agenda • Staff Report: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager • Citizen Comment— 3 minutes 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointments b. Arts Commission Appointment The City Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. City Council Meetings are wheelchair accessible; and assisted listening devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk. Regular Meetings are recorded and televised live on Government Access Channel 21.To view Council Meetings online please visit www.cityoffederalway.com. c. Cancellation of December 17, 2019 Regular Council Meeting d. Proposed Settlement Agreement Regarding the Prekeges Lawsuit 8. ORDINANCES First Reading a. Council Bill #768/Encouraging Investments in Affordable Housing and Supporting Housing through Sales Tax in Accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (SHB 1406) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO INVESTMENTS IN AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING; ADDING NEW SECTIONS TO CHAPTER 3.35 FWRC. • Staff Report presented during Public Hearing • Citizen Comment— 3 minutes Second Reading/Enactment b. Council Bill #767 Relating to PAEC Construction Interfund Loan Bonding AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CONTRACTING INDEBTEDNESS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF NOT TO EXCEED$7,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO PROVIDE FUNDS TO REPAY THE CITY'S COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING THE PERFORMING ARTS AND EVENTS CENTER, AND TO PAY THE COSTS OF ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS; FIXING OR SETTING PARAMETERS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TERMS AND COVENANTS OF THE BONDS; APPOINTING THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE THE FINAL TERMS OF THE SALE OF THE BONDS; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER RELATED MATTERS. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION • Collective Bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(b) • Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) 11. ADJOURNMENT The City Council may add items and take action on items not listed on the agenda. City Council Meetings are wheelchair accessible; and assisted listening devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk. Regular Meetings are recorded and televised live on Government Access Channel 21.To view Council Meetings online please visit www.cityoffederalway.com. CITY OF ~ . Federal Way s PROCLAMATION "Domestic Violence Awareness Month" October 2019 WHEREAS, domestic violence is a serious crime that affects people of all races, ages, gender, and income levels;and WHEREAS, according to the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, police respond to about 50,000 domestic violence calls every year in Washington and approximately 2,100 domestic violence calls every year in the City of Federal Way;and WHEREAS, even with the significant number of calls responded to by police, 70%of domestic violence that occurs goes unreported;and WHEREAS, although men and children can be victims of domestic violence it is committed predominately against women and is the leading cause of injury to women between the ages of 15 to 44 in the United States; and WHEREAS, children that grow up in violent homes are believed to be abused and neglected at a rate higher than the national average; and children that experience domestic violence are impacted in their education and are more likely to continue the cycle of domestic violence in dating relationships as youth and in adult relationships;and WHEREAS, each year, medical expenses from domestic violence total at least $5 billion dollars, and businesses forfeit another $100 million dollars in lost wages, sick leave, absenteeism and non- productivity;and WHEREAS, in response to the prevalence of domestic violence in this community, the Federal Way Domestic Violence Task Force members have been working toward promoting prevention, victim safety,community awareness and abuser accountability through organization,education and outreach; NOW, THEREFORE, we, the undersigned Mayor and City Councilmembers of the City of Federal Way,do hereby proclaim the month of October $019 as "Domestic Violence Awareness Month",and urge our citizens to recognize this critical problem facing our entire community, work to prevent domestic violence,increase services to domestic violence victims and their children,and continue efforts to eliminate this crime which affects all of us in this community,our state,and our nation. SIGNED this 15th day of October,2019 FE I"U WAYMAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Ferrell,Mayor Su Honda,Deputy Mayor Rssefa-Dow Councilmember Je s E.Johnson,Councilmember Hoang V. ran,Councilmember I Ko Councilme er Martin M are,Councilmember Dini Duclos,Councilmember CITY OF .. Federal Way PROCLAMATION "National Disability Awareness Month" October 2019 WHEREAS,Americans with disabilities are entitled to the same rights and freedoms as any other citizen,including the right to dignity and respect in the workplace;and WHEREAS,the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Act provide anti-discrimination protections for the 49 million Americans with disabilities and recognize their right to be integral, contributing, productive and valued citizens of our country, state, and city; and WHEREAS, workplaces welcoming of the talents of all people, including people with disabilities, are a critical part of our efforts to build an inclusive community and strong economy;and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way actively supports the goals of equity, opportunity, full participation,independent living and economic self-sufficiency for all people with disabilities;and WHEREAS, in this spirit, we recognize National Disability Employment Awareness Month to recognize the many ways individuals with disabilities strengthen our workforce and contribute to our community;and WHEREAS, the theme of this year's Awareness Month is "The Right Talent, Right Now " in order to raise awareness of disability employment issues and honor the contributions of America's workers with disabilities; NOW THEREFORE, we, the Mayor and the Federal Way City Council do hereby proclaim October 2019 as"National Disability Employment Awareness Month" in the City of Federal Way, and urge all citizens in Federal Way to embrace the talents and skills that individuals with disabilities bring to our community. SIGNED this 15th day of October,2019 FEDERAL WAYMAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 1im Ferrell,Mayor / Susan Honda,Deputy Mayor Ly a sefa-Dawson ounc(member J. Johnson,Councilmember Hoa N.Tran,Councilmember rk Ko ng, nc.1 er Martin Moore,Councilmember Dini Duclos,Councilmember K i 1 1 1 1' 1 [' t < 1�✓ S•+Y Y f Y C Y Y • 1. • . 1�+ Y� 1' � _ V r r � c' I r r ♦ �i ✓ _ ` ri CL fD ft—,3� (D QU PAO o In, p o- n3 =5 Q a - a ! ! . Cl Q a M CD rb rb • '{ to `D p cD (' -n W cn Q InCb = (D Y - ZAI _ (DD O o 3 0 [ �. 0 rR P O17D 0- \ a fD _ 3 o c m O r f I'Y rE] a CL fD N _ ` Y - co _ ,r = o ` N y Win sl - 2' •:'�_tea. �...► � _... - S'- + rl ID N - - ID js _ (D i--r 10 r+ moh 3 0 T t N ' Q TI r - Q. CL I [D ;•t" O j `< _ o CD 0 p = Y n [p [D _ N rtL 3 T bo O (D s 00 � •. jL •.�. � .. ��`iwcy:a.. i~� ',� '� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#: '✓ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the draft minutes for the October 1, 2019 Regular and Special City Council Meetings? COMMITTEE:N/A MEETING DATE: N/A CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: .Stephanie Courtney, City Clerk DEPT: Mayor's Office Attachments: Draft minutes for the October 1, 2019 Regular and Special Meetings Options Considered: 1. Approve the minutes as presented. 2. Amend the minutes as necessary. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION:N/A MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A N/A CITY CLERK APPROVAL: �Q Committee Council lnitiaU?atc Initial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A N/A N/A N/A Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the minutes as presented. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF z•.... Federal Way CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Council Chambers - City Hall 11)?4AAr October 1, 2019 5:00 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Ferrell called the meeting to order at 5:33 p.m. City officials in attendance: Deputy Mayor Susan Honda, Councilmember Johnson; Councilmember Hoang Tran, Councilmember Mark Koppang, Councilmember Martin Moore, and Councilmember Dini Duclos. Councilmember Assefa-Dawson participated via phone. City staff in attendance: City Attorney Ryan Call and City Clerk Stephanie Courtney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Ferrell led the flag salute. 3. STUDY SESSION a. Sound Transit Operating and Maintenance Facility (OMF) Tony Doucette, Staff Liaison to Sound Transit introduced the representatives from Sound Transit who would be presenting including Austin Neilson, Government and Community Relations Office; Currie Hawkins, TDLE Project Development Director; and Gwen McCullough, OMF South Development Manager. Mr. Neilson thanked the City Council for the invitation to speak and noted they last briefed the Council on the OMF process in February of this year. The early scoping public comment period ran through April 2018; alternatives evaluation took place summer-fall 2018; and the scoping public comment period was open from February 19 through April 1, 2019. Mr. Hawkins spoke regarding the need for, and the purpose of the facility which will open in 2026 to provide service to the projects coming on line in 2030 including delivery of vehicles and maintenance. This facility will store and maintains the vehicles and will also do light maintenance and cleaning. In addition, this facility will house staff and equipment for right-of-way maintenance, creating over 300 living wage jobs. Ms. McCullough reported on the outreach Sound Transit has done including Federal Way Open Houses, online comments, direct mailers and social media engagement. They reviewed the process Federal Way City Council Special Minutes Page 1 of 3 October 1, 2019 to-date including the public process and comment period, the six sites that were reviewed under the scoping period, and the remaining three sites that are currently being evaluated. Mr. Neilson also highlighted upcoming open houses and online survey opportunities to provide feedback on the project and the three sites under analysis. The Sound Transit Board took action in May 2019 to forward the following three sites for further review (1) Midway Landfill; (2) S. 336th Street; and (3) S. 344th St. Ms. McCullough noted the issues which are typically studied during and Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) including Transportation, Natural Environment, and Built Environment.She provided the following timeline, noting dates are subject to change: • Summer 2019— Begin work on the Draft EIS Summer 2020 — Draft EIS issued, public, tribal, agency comments • Fall 2020— Sound Transit Board identifies preferred site Winter 2020 — Begin work on the Final EIS Summer 2021 — Final EIS issued, Preliminary Engineering complete • Fall 2021 — Sound Transit selects project to be built Citizen Comment Dana Holloway spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and in support of the Midway Landfill location. Howard Nash, associated with Garage Town, spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and in support of the Midway Landfill location. Scott Carsa_n, Garage Town owner, spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and in support of the Midway Landfill location. Russ„Hibbard, Northwest Equipment Sales, spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and in support of the Midway Landfill location Mia Franklin spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and in support of the Midway Landfill location Pp,ter Barbin, Garage Town owner, spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and in support of the Midway Landfill location. Margaret Nelson spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and in support of the Midway Landfill location. Lawson Bronson was a stakeholder on the Tacoma Dome Link Extension project and shared at one point the Midway Landfill was off the table due to contamination. He believes this should not exclude the site from consideration. Lamont Styles spoke in opposition to the OMF being located in Federal Way and questioned how people are notified about public meetings. Council Comments/Questions Deputy Mayor Honda clarified this is not a decision made by the Council, and the Council has sent letters to the Board and testified regarding the Federal Way sites. She feels Sound Transit needs to engage the community better as these projects are going to affect the downtown and community. Councilmember Moore would like to make sure Sound Transit is communicating better with those who could be or are impacted by these locations, he is concerned with how 20 sites were narrowed down to three, with three sites located in Federal Way. Councilmember Johnson noted he recently met with Sound Transit CEO Peter Rogoff and he would like assurances that impacted stakeholders have a voice in this process, and that properties are fairly Federal Way City Council Special Mimttes Page 2 of 3 October 1, 2019 assessed. Councilmember Tran asked to clarify who the lead agency is for the EIS Study and if it was independently reviewed. Councilmember Assefa-Dawson echoed comments of her colleagues and stated this should be sited at the landfill which will repurpose that property and not affect home and business owners. She also noted this could potentially impact a high population of minority owned businesses who are less likely to attend and give comment at meetings. Councilmember Koppang stated there are benefits for light rail coming to Federal Way however there is not a lot of confidence in the process to date with communication. He would like Sound Transit to do better and have the Council and community members more confident in knowing information is getting out. Deputy Mayor thanked Sound Transit representatives for coming to present tonight, and reiterated that no one wants the OMF site in Federal Way, the clear choice is the Midway Landfill. Mr. Hawkins thanked the Council and citizens for the comments. He confirmed all comments are taken under consideration by the Sound Transit Board. He noted in response to multiple comments regarding the Midway Landfill site, there are increased risks and legal responsibility as well as unknowns on that property which could affect or delay the timeline of the OMF opening, which are issues being addressed and studied. Mayor Ferrell thanked Sound Transit for appearing at this special meeting called by the City Council, and clarified this was an added meeting for briefing the Council and informational purposes in enhance the dialog. 4. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 6:21 p.m. Mayor Ferrell announced the Council would be recessing into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing potential litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1(i) for approximately 10 minutes. • Potential Litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) Council returned from Executive Session at 6:30 p.m. 5. ADJOURNMENT There being nothing further on the agenda; the Special Meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m Attest: Stephanie Courtney City Clerk Approved by Council: Federal Wav City Council Special Minutes Page 3 01 3 October 1, 2019 CITY OF Federal Way CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Council Chambers - City Hall October 1, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. "44Ar 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Ferrell called the meeting to order at 6:36 p.m. City officials in attendance: Mayor Jim Ferrell, Deputy Mayor Susan Honda, Councilmember Jesse Johnson, Councilmember Hoang Tran, Councilmember Mark Koppang, Councilmember Martin Moore, and Councilmember Dini Duclos. City staff in attendance: City Attorney Ryan Call and City Clerk Stephanie Courtney Councilmember Lydia Assefa-Dawson participated via phone. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Ferrell led the flag salute 3. PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation: Fire Prevention Week October 6-12 Deputy Mayor Honda read and presented the proclamation to South King Fire and Rescue's Chief Vic Pennington. He thanked the Mayor and Council and reminded everyone to change their smoke detector batteries twice a year when they change their clocks for Daylight Savings. b. Second Quarterly Financial Report Finance Director Ade Ariwoola presented the Second Quarter Financial Report for the period ending June 30, 2019. He reviewed sales tax, utility tax, property tax and REET numbers. Director Ariwoola also reported on the city's overall debt and debt capacity,the balanced budget, and the 2018 State Financial Audit. c. Mayor's Emerging Issues and Report Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 1 of 8 October 1, 2019 • Mayor's Day of Concern Recap City Council's Executive Assistant Jeri-Lynn Clark gave a brief report to Council regarding the recent Mayor's Day of Concern Food Drive at local grocery stores. She noted they had over 20 volunteers at local stores where they collected a total of 2,100 pounds of food and $305.66 in cash donations. Laura Moser from Waste Management further reported on the curbside collection which happened concurrently; Waste Management picked up over 13,200 pounds of food (6.6 tons) for donation to the Multi-Service Center Food Bank. Ms. Moserthanked the Waste Management drivers, the city, and the citizens for collaboration on this great cause. She was pleased to note that in the 12 years Waste Management has participated, they have collected 154,495 pounds of food for donation back to the community. The Mayor and Councilmembers all expressed their gratitude and appreciation to Ms. Moser, and Ms. Clark, and all the volunteers for their ongoing dedication and efforts in helping the community every year. • Jaywalking and Enforcement Chief of Police Andy Hwang gave a brief report on efforts to address jaywalking in the city and other traffic related accidents. Chief Hwang noted overall total accidents in 2018 were 2,174 and in the first 6 months of 2019 the total is 938. Pedestrian related infractions have seen an increase from 2018 in incidents where pedestrians fail to cross at crosswalks and drivers failure to yield to pedestrians. He stressed that traffic accidents are the leading cause of injury and asked for everyone to be more vigilant in safe driving practices. • City's Recycling Event Report Jeanette Brizendine, Solid Waste & Recycling Project Manager reported on the recent recycling event held at the Wild Waves parking lot. She noted this is a 100% free event which is funded by grants. The event was very successful and had the highest historical attendance; staff worked to keep lines moving and the event organized for those waiting.The next event will be April 18 from 9:00 a.m.to 3:00 p.m. The Mayor and Councilmembers thanked Ms. Brizendine for her hard work and ongoing dedication in organizing these beneficial events for city residents. They were overwhelmed with the amount of vehicles moving through and the great attitudes of staff and volunteers who were working the event. • Report on recent events Mayor Ferrell reported at his attendance at recent community events including the Taste of Federal Way at the Farmers Market on September 28; many Councilmembers and community members also attended and the food was wonderful. Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 2 of 8 October 1, 2019 Deputy Mayor Honda recognized and congratulated Ms. Betty Taylor who recently received the Dick Mayer Community Award for her heart, advocacy, and unfailing commitment to better the local community. • Upcoming events Mayor Ferrell reminded everyone of upcoming events including the National Coffee with a Cop at B & R Coffee on October 2; Federal Way Community Caregiving Network Souper Supper on October 4 at Christian Faith Center at 5:30 p.m.; the Performing Arts & Event Center Annual Gala and Los Lobos Performance benefiting Arts for Youth on October 5 at 8:00 p.m.; and the Brooklake Trail Connector Ribbon Cutting on October 11 at 10:15 a.m. d. Council Committee Reports • Finance, Economic Development Regional Affairs Committee (FEDRAC) Councilmember Duclos noted last Tuesday's meeting had a long agenda where school impact fees and fireworks fines were discussed. She noted she will be meeting with the Finance Director and the State Auditors tomorrow. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) Councilmember Moore noted he continues to work toward a name change for this committee to make it more relatable. • Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) Councilmember Koppang reported on a long agenda for the most recent LUTC meeting. He noted the items on the upcoming agenda and encouraged citizens to attend. Parks/Recreation/Human Services/Public Safety Committee (PRHSPS) Councilmember Johnson noted the next meeting will be October 8 in Council Chambers and the first meeting that will be video recorded. He reported on the issues being discussed by this committee and noted Chief Hwang will be presenting a quarterly public safety update. He also noted the Council is holding a special meeting on October 28 regarding the Homelessness Task Force recommendations. • Regional Committees Report (PIC) Councilmember Assefa-Dawson reported on the upcoming Sound Cities Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 3 of 8 October 1. 2019 Association Public Issues Committee meeting on October 9. She noted the issues which will be reviewed by the King County Charter Review Commission. Deputy Mayor Report Deputy Mayor Honda reminded everyone of the next Coffee with the Council on October 12 at City Hall. She noted this is a very informal setting with open dialog and conversation. She reviewed the committee meetings dates and noted all Council Committees are now being video recorded. 4. CITIZEN COMMENT Dana Holloway expressed her concern regarding the multi-family property tax exemptions being granted and the city not being included in the decision making process. Robert Morrison shared multiple safety concerns including the need for additional lighting at intersections to reduce the number of accidents and graffiti behind McDonald's on S 23rd Avenue. Tim O'Neil, Federal Way resident and Planning Commissioner, shared his concerns regarding the proposed location of the ST3 Station and the anticipated increased pedestrian traffic. He requested Council consider an overhead walkway to cross S 320th Street. Lamont Styles expressed concerns regarding noticing for public meetings,especially meeting related to Sound Transit. Betty Taylor announced overnight shelters have opened and directed individuals in need to first go to the Day Center. She provided details regarding Reach Out's 9th Annual Fundraising Breakfast scheduled for November 7. Anna Pairick invited participation in the Thriller Flash Mob scheduled for October 26 at 11:00 a.m. at the Saturday Market. 5. CONSENT AGENDA a. Minutes: September 17, 2019 City Council Regular and Special Meeting Minutes b. Vouchers—July 2019 c. Vouchers—August 2019 d. Monthly Financial Report- July 2019 e. Monthly Financial Report—August 2019 DEPUTY MAYOR HONDA MOVED APPROVAL OF ITEMS A THROUGH E ON THE CONSENT AGENDA; COUNCILMEMBER KOPPANG SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 4 of 8 October 1, 2019 Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes 6. COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Council Discussion regarding the proposed King County Regional Homelessness Authority Senior Advisor Bill Vadino provided background and additional information regarding the proposed King County Regional Homelessness Authority. He noted the proposed authority would oversee policy, funding and services for people experiencing homelessness countywide.This would occur through a new Public Development Authority(PDA)who would administer and oversee regional homelessness efforts with Interlocal agreements with cities participating. Mr.Vadino reviewed many of the questions currently being discussed including the city's role and the proposed entity's authority. The Mayor and Council discussed this issue and asked clarifying questions. Mr. Vadino noted this is a moving target at this point in time and more information will be forth coming as the process moves forward and is further discussed regionally. No action was taken. b. Council Confirmation of Independent Salary Commission Appointments DEPUTY MAYOR HONDA MOVED TO CONFIRM THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF ROGER FLYGARE TO POSITION #2 AND KENNY BYRNE TO POSITION #3 OF THE INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION; COUNCILMEMBER KOPPANG SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes 7. ORDINANCES First Reading: a. Council Bill #767 Relating to PAEC Construction Interfund_Loan Bonding ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CONTRACTING INDEBTEDNESS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF NOT TO EXCEED $7,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO PROVIDE FUNDS TO REPAY THE CITY'S COSTS OF CONSTRUCTING THE PERFORMING ARTS AND EVENTS CENTER, AND TO PAY THE COSTS OF ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS; FIXING OR SETTING PARAMETERS WITH RESPECT Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 5 of'8 October 1. 2019 TO CERTAIN TERMS AND COVENANTS OF THE BONDS;APPOINTING THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE THE FINAL TERMS OF THE SALE OF THE BONDS; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER RELATED MATTERS. Finance Director Ade Ariwoola introduced the city's Bond Counsel, Nancy Neraas, Principal, Foster Garvey PC; and Caitlin Caldwell, VP, KeyBanc Capital Markets,who both spoke to this item. The Limited Tax General Obligation Bond (LTGO)will be amortized over 20 years with a 10-year call option. The bond amount will not exceed $7 million and will repay the Interfund loan for PAEC construction,which was authorized by Council in 2014. Of the $13 million original loan, the balance is currently$6.76M. No citizen comments were received Director Ariwoola responded to questions from Council. City Clerk Stephanie Courtney read the ordinance title into the record. COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS MOVED TO FORWARD THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO THE OCTOBER 15, 2019 COUNCIL MEETING FOR SECOND READING AND ENACTMENT; COUNCILMEMBER TRAN SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes Second Reading/Enactment: b. Council Bill #764 Relating to Snow and Ice ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO DECLARING WINTER SNOW AND ICE EMERGENCIES AS SNOW ALERTS, REMOVAL OF SNOW AND ICE FROM SIDEWALKS, REMOVAL OF VEHICLES FROM CITY PRIMARY SNOW ROUTES DURING DECLARED SNOW ALERTS, AND PROHIBITING THE ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLES ON CITY STREET DURING THE SAME; AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS TO CHAPTER 4.40 AND 8.60 FWRC. City Clerk Stephanie Courtney read the ordinance title into the record COUNCILMEMBER KOPPANG MOVED APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE; COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes Federal 6Vay City Council Regular Minutes Page 6 of 8 October 1, 2019 c. Council Bill #765 Renewal of North Lake Manaaement District#2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO THE RENEWAL OF THE NORTH LAKE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE DISTRICT. City Clerk Stephanie Courtney read the ordinance title into the record. COUNCILMEMBER KOPPANG MOVED APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE; COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes d. Council Bill #766 Surface Water Management (SWM) 2021 Rate Stl-Licfllre Change ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CHANGING THE POLICY AND RATE STRUCTURE FOR THE STORM AND SURFACE WATER UTILITY; AMENDING FWRC 11.40.030, 11.40.100, 11.45.010, 11.45.020, 11.45.030,AND 11.45.070; REPEALING FWRC 11.40.050, 11.40.080,AND 11.40.090;AND ADDING A NEW SECTION TO CHAPTER 11.40 FWRC. (AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 14-775, 07-571, 06-544, 02-433, 96-277, 91-117, AND 90-32) City Clerk Stephanie Courtney read the ordinance title into the record. COUNCILMEMBER KOPPANG MOVED APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE; COUNCILMEMBER DUCLOS SECOND. The motion passed unanimously as follows: Deputy Mayor Honda yes Councilmember Koppang yes CouncilmemberAssefa-Dawson yes Councilmember Moore yes Councilmember Johnson yes Councilmember Duclos yes Councilmember Tran yes 8. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Assefa-Dawson thanked the Mayor and Council for allowing her to participate via phone this evening. Councilmember Johnson invited everyone to the next"Coffee with Council"on Saturday, October 12 at City Hall. He noted the King County Charter Review Board will be holding a public meeting at City Hall on October -17t'' from 7-9 p.m. where they will be reviewing many important topics including the size of the King County Council, and the King County Sheriff; he encouraged participation and representation for residents. Councilmember Tran had no report. Councilmember Koppang reported on his attendance at the Korean Community Quarterly City Update and was impressed with how engaged and committed the Korean community continues to be. He thanked Shelly Pauls and the We Love Our City group and encouraged citizens to volunteer and Federal Wav City Council Regular Minutes Page 7 of'8 October 1. 2019 become involved. Councilmember Moore reported he had a great time as a guest teacher for the Federal Way School District with a 3�d Grade class at Woodmont Elementary. He reported on attending meetings for the Rental Inspection Program, and thanked staff members who are working on that important program. Councilmember Duclos had no report. Deputy Mayor Honda thanked the Jr. ROTC and the Key Club for their participation in the Mayor's Day of Concern Food Drive. She encouraged citizens to connect with Council via the Council Facebook page and find out upcoming events. She asked everyone to pay extra care driving this week with Homecoming for multiple local high schools.This month is Domestic Violence Awareness Month and the Federal Way Domestic Violence Task Force meets every month at City Hall; a proclamation will be given at the next Council Meeting. 9. ADJOURNMENT There being nothing further on the agenda; the Regular Meeting was adjourned at 8:43 p.m Attest: Stephanie Courtney City Clerk Approved by Council: Federal Way City Council Regular Minutes Page 8 of 8 October 1, 2019 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: COMPLETE STREETS ADA UPGRADES—30%DESIGN REPORT AND AUTHORIZATION TO BID WITH THE 2020 ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJECT POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council authorize staff to proceed with design of the Complete Streets ADA Upgrades, allow the Complete Streets project to be bid under the 2020 Asphalt Overlay Project and return to the LUTC and Council at 85%design completion for further reports and authorization? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: Oct. 7,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT.BY: John.Mulke ,P.E., Senior Capital Engineers 2w DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated October 7,2019. Options Considered: 1. Authorize staff to proceed with design of the Complete Streets ADA Upgrades, allow the Complete Streets project to be bid under the 2020 Asphalt Overlay Project and return to the LUTC and Council at 85%design completion for further reports and authorization. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed with thisr�olect and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the October 15,2019 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: Cu�nmi DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ' O l l 19 InitiaVDate �°r InitiaVDate "Inifi.U�Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward 0 0y) to the p C.0 (e sV(fill in date)consent agenda for approval. Co ittee Chair Xo6imittee Member Co mttee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to proceed with design of the Complete Streets ADA Upgrades, allow the Complete Streets project to be bid under the 2020 Asphalt Overlay Project and return to the LUTC and Council at 85%design completion for further reports and authorization." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7, 2019 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: E.J.Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Director John Mulkey,P.E., Senior Capital Engineer SUBJECT: Complete Streets iIDA Upgrades—30%Design Report and Authorization to Bid with the 2020 Aspli fll Overiziy Pro-iect FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This project was included and is projected to be completed within the approved budget under capital project#222. In accordance with the approved budget this project is funded by a grant from T.I.B. in the amount of$100,000 and the remainder in City funds. Upon completion of this project, ongoing costs associated with operations and maintenance will be performed and funded through street and traffic maintenance, as this will only replace existing equipment. Funding requirements for operations and maintenance of infrastructure is reviewed and adjusted as required during the budget process. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This project will replace existing,non-compliant, curb ramps and other pedestrian facilities at the intersection of S 320t'Street and SR 99 and bring them into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities(ADA) as part of the City's effort to comply with our submitted ADA Transition Plan. The Public Works Department is also requesting to include this work to be bid as a part of the City's 2020 Asphalt Overly Project, as a separate schedule. Staff believes, due to the location and type of work,this project would not bid favorably on its own,and believe including it in the Overlay project would benefit this projects bid prices due to similar work done in preparation for overlay. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 30%complete,which includes the following completed tasks: • Completed survey and field review • Project Design to 30% • SEPA Exemption Review Ongoing Tasks Include: • Project Design to 85% • Contract Specifications + Plans to 85% PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Survey $8,832 Design(In House) $15,000 2020 Construction Cost $151,000 10%Construction Contingency $15,100 October 7,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Complete Streets ADA Upgrades—30%Design Report Page 2 Construction Management (by City staff) $10,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $199,932 AVAILABLE FUNDING: TIB Complete Streets Grant (State) $100,000 City Funds ('Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)account) $100,000 TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $200,000 PROJECT BUDGET SURPLUS: $68 After receiving bids, the total project costs will be refined and presented to the Committee and Council for bid award authorization. Staff anticipates bidding this project in February 2020 with the 2020 Asphalt Overlay Project. Construction of the overlay project is anticipated to start in Spring 2020 with an estimated substantial completion date in Summer 2020. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM#:_ 5C _ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:HORIZONTAL CURVE WARNING SIGNS—30%DESIGN REPORT POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council authorize staff to proceed with design of the Horizontal Curve Warning Signs and return to the LUTC and Council at 85%design completion for further reports and authorization? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: Oct. 7,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: John Mulkey,P.E., Senior Capital Engineer, DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated October 7,2019. Options Considered: 1. Authorize staff to proceed with design of the Horizontal Curve Warning Signs and return to the LUTC and Council at 85%design completion for further reports and authorization. 2. Do not authorize staff to proceed.with this project andprovide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the October 15,2019 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: / iQ (�q COMMAMCuu icil SnitiafA7atc InitiaMate 1nittaLi Wte COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward j-i Cr to the OCk�b« 1 � Gill in date)consent agenda for approval. C ittee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to proceed with design of the Horizontal Curve Warning Signs and return to the LUTC and Council at 85% design completion for further reports and authorization." BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7,2019 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: E.J. Walsh,P.E., Public Works Director ,' ,..., .Toll 7 ML11kcy,P.E., Senior Capital Engineer SUBJECT: Horizontal Curve Warning Signs—30%Design Report FINANCIAL IMPACTS: ' This project was included and is projected to be completed within the approved budget under capital project #218. In accordance with the approved budget this project is funded by a Federal grant in the amount of$519,700 and the remainder in City funds. Upon completion of this project, ongoing costs associated with operations and maintenance will be performed and funded through traffic sign maintenance. Funding requirements for operations and maintenance of infrastructure is reviewed and adjusted as required during the budget process. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This project will collect data,determine and install the appropriate signage to upgrade to current MUTCD standard curve warning signs citywide. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is approximately 30%complete,which includes the following completed tasks: • Completed Ball bank Study to determine in curves requires signage • Determination of appropriate signage • Project Design to 30% ■ SEPA Exemption Review Ongoing Tasks Include: • Project Design to 85% • Contract Specifications ■ Plans to 85% PROJECT ESTIiII_LTED EMIENDITURES: Ball Bank Study $8,100 Design(by Consultant) $79,120 2020 Construction Cost $385,727 10%Construction Contingency $38,573 Construction Management (by City staff $10,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $521,520 October 7,2019 Land Use and Transportation Committee Horizontal Curve Warning Signs—30%Design Report Page 2 AVAILABLE FUNDING: Federal Grant $519,700 City Funds (miscellaneous capital street fund $4;600 transfers) TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $524,300 PROJECT BUDGET SURPLUS: $2,700 After receiving bids, the total project costs will be refined and presented to the Committee and Council for bid award authorization. Staff anticipates bidding this project in March 2020. Construction is anticipated to start in Spring 2020 with an estimated substantial completion date in Summer 2020. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 15,2019 ITEM#: 5 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SILL SUBJECT:LAKEHAVEN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT—S DASH POINT ROAD SIDEWALK PROJECT POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize the Mayor to execute the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Lakehaven Water& Sewer District for the S Dash Point Road Sidewalk Project? COMMITTEE: Land Use&Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: October 7,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Christine MullSenior Capitn eer DEPT: Public Works e E, al E Attachments: 1. Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated October 7,2019 2. Interlocal Agreement Options Considered: 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Lakehaven Water& Sewer District for the S Dash Point Road Sidewalk Project. 2. Do not authorize the Mayor to execute the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Lakehaven Water& Sewer District for the S Dash Point Road Sidewalk Project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the October 15,2019 City Council Consent Agenda pr approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: 47 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: M `1 co COACH/, InitiaVDate ]nitia].Date InitiaVDate COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the October 15, 2019 City Council consent agenda for approval. r Mark 1Co r,CommitteerLhair Jesse son,Committee Member Hoalig Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize the Mayor to execute the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Lakehaven Water&Sewer District for the S Dash Point Road Sidewalk Project." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7,2019 TO: Council VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor f �_ FROM: E.J.Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Directory�✓:.�'' Christine Mullen,P.E., Senior Capital Engince SUBJECT: Lakehaven Interlocal Agreement—S Dash Point Road Sidewalk Project FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Any costs incurred by the City for the construction of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District's improvements, will be reimbursed as outlined in the Interlocal Agreement. Upon completion of the project,the City will be reimbursed in full for costs associated with Lakehaven Water& Sewer District's improvements. Ongoing operations and maintenance costs associated with the water and sewer improvements will be funded by Lakehaven Water& Sewer District. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Lakehaven Water & Sewer District requested the City enter into an interlocal agreement for the construction of watermain replacement and adjustment of facilities as part of the S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Project in an effort to reduce both cost and extended public disruption of the area. A copy of the proposed agreement is attached to this memo. The estimated cost of the interlocal agreement is $372,922.91. This amount will be paid to the City by Lakehaven Water& Sewer District to reimburse the City for construction, construction management, and project administration costs. Actual reimbursement costs for the interlocal agreement will be determined based on bid amounts from the selected contractor and actual costs incurred. After recording, return to: City of Federal Way Public Works Department Attn: Christine Mullen, P.E. 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT FOR THE S DASH POINT RD SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (9TH PL S TO 320' EAST OF 11TH PL S) CFW PROJECT#36-212 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ,2019, by and between the City of Federal Way(hereinafter"City")and Lakehaven Water and Sewer District(hereinafter"District"), collectively referred to herein as the "Parties." WHEREAS, the City proposes to proceed with the S Dash Point Road Sidewalk Improvement Project (9th PI S to 320' east of 11th PI S), hereinafter"Project"; and WHEREAS, the District provides water and sewer service in the general area of the Project in accordance with applicable Washington State and City laws, regulations and franchises; and WHEREAS,in connection with the street and storm improvements being undertaken by the City, the District will be required to relocate and modify certain water and sanitary sewer facilities such as water main,fire hydrants,valves,water meters, etc.; resolve water and sewer facility conflicts with other proposed improvements;and undertake other related work within the Project area; and WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act) permits local governmental units to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other entities to provide services in a manner best serving the needs and development of their local communities; and WHEREAS, the District can achieve cost savings and other benefits in the public's interest by contracting with the City to perform certain services for the District, including letting a public works construction contract for the water and sewer work in connection with the Project (hereinafter "District Work"), and providing construction management services in support thereof; and S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 1 Lakehaven Water&Sewer District Interlocal Agreement WHEREAS, RCW 39.34.030(5)(b)and RCW 39.34.080 authorize the District to contract with the City to utilize and join in the City's bid and award process for the Project to include the District Work; and WHEREAS, the City agrees that the District Work should be included in the bid and award process for the Project to take advantage of the cost savings and other benefits in the public's interest. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby covenanted and agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows: 1. DESIGN AND PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE. The District shall provide the City with reproducible construction drawings, special contract provisions, and other necessary documents which will sufficiently detail requirements for the District Work to become a part of the Contract Bid Documents and Engineer's estimate for the Project.The necessary documents in this section shall be subject to City approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. II. BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. A. It is the intention of the Parties that the District plans and specifications be incorporated into the Contract Bid Documents for the Project in such manner as to allow,to the extent possible, identification of cost allocations between the Parties.The District Work will be advertised as a separate bid schedule that will be part of the Base Bid for award. B. The City shall call for bids for performing the Project and the District Work. The District Work Following opening of construction bids for the Project, the City shall furnish for the District's review a tabulation of the bid responses submitted forthe District Work. The District will be given the opportunity to review and comment on the low bidder; however, the City will have the sole discretion regarding the selection of the contractor. Within twenty days of receiving the bid tabulation, the District shall notify the City in writing whether the District approves or rejects their portion of the bid award. If the City elects to award a contract for the project, bid award will be made to the lowest responsible bidder for the total Project subject to applicable laws and regulations. The City shall not proceed with the District Work until the City has received approval from the District for its portion of the bid award; provided, however, if no bids are received which, in the estimation of the District, are acceptable to the District for the District Work, the District shall so immediately notify the City. Following such notice from the District that the bid results are unacceptable to the District,the City may elect to proceed with its portion of the Project, and the District Work shall be deleted from the Contract Documents. C. Pursuant to RCW 39.34.080(5)(b),the City shall either(1)post the bid or solicitation notice on the City's web site, the website of a purchasing cooperative, or similar service provider, for purposes of posting public notice of bid or proposal solicitations, or (2) provided an access link on the state's web portal to the notice. S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 2 Lakehaven Water&Sewer District Interlocal Agreement III. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. A. The City shall provide the necessary administrative, construction observation,and clerical services necessary for the execution of the Project, exclusive of such construction observation, material review and ancillary construction administration support provided by the District in coordination with City staff. In providing such services, the City Public Works Director and/or his or her designee may exercise all the powers and perform all the duties vested by law in him or her. The District grants to the City Public Works Director and/or his or her designee authority to act on behalf of the District sufficient to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. B. The District shall notify the City, in writing, of any changes it wishes to make in the plans and specifications which affect the District Work, which changes shall be made, if feasible. The City shall notify the District, in writing, of any changes required of the District Work and shall obtain the District's approval of such changes. The District's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The District shall be responsible for all costs incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of these or any other changes required or requested by the District. IV. PAYMENT. A. The District shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in performing the District Work,which costs shall include, but are not limited to, the District work performed by the City's Project contractor(s), the City's design and inspection consultants, all District requested changes, and the District's cost of the City services described in Paragraph IILA herein and as summarized in Exhibit A. The estimated costs for the District Work are for order-of-magnitude planning purposes. Actual costs to be reimbursed to the City will be determined after bid opening. B. All payments shall be due from the District to the City within thirty (30) days after approval by the District's General Manager or his/her designee of said sums billed to the District. Amounts unpaid after said due date shall accrue interest at a rate of one (1) percent per month. C. The City shall make all disbursements to the Project contractors and consultants. V. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. A. The City agrees to indemnify and hold the District, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the City, its agents or employees, or by the City's breach of this S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 3 Lakehaven Water&Sewer District Interlocal Agreement Agreement. B. The District agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this Agreement to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the District, its agents or employees, or by the District's breach of this Agreement. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement with respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination. VI. DURATION. This agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution by both parties, and shall continue in force until either: (1) the District rejects all bids as set forth in Paragraph 11.13 herein;or(2)the City Council accepts the completion of the project,whichever is earlier. VII. OTHER PROVISIONS. A. The City shall retain ownership and usual maintenance responsibility for the roadway, storm drainage system, sidewalks, landscaping, traffic signals and all other appurtenances related thereto. B. Upon completion of the construction and City's acceptance of the Project as fully constructed according to the Contract Documents,including District requested changes, the City shall provide a final invoice to the District for any final payment due. The District's payment of this final invoice shall, in effect,transfer ownership of these water and sewer mains and appurtenances to the District and the District shall thereafter be responsible for maintenance of such facilities. C. This Agreement contains the entire written agreement of the Parties and supersedes all prior discussion. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, signed by both Parties. D. This Agreement may be extended for additional periods of time upon mutual written agreement of the City and District. E. Adherence to deadline dates is essential to the performance of this Interlocal Agreement. F. Any provision of this Agreement,which is declared invalid,void or illegal shall in no way affect, impair,or invalidate any other provision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 4 Lakehaven Water&Sewer District Interlocal Agreement G. Should any claims arise related to the District Work portion of the Project, the City shall handle and administer the claims in the same manner it would handle any other claims on the Project and the District shall reimburse the City for all expenses associated with handling such claims. The City shall immediately notify the District and keep it informed as to the progress of the claim. The District will provide guidance regarding proposed terms of settlement. Any decision regarding the settlement or prosecution of a claim shall be approved by the District prior to being finalized. If the District and the City cannot agree as to the prosecution or settlement of a claim,the District may prosecute or defend the claim and the City will assign such claims to the District. The District agrees to pay all costs of prosecution or defense if assigned such claims and defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City from all damages the City suffers from the District's prosecution or defense of the claim. IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefit accruing herein, the Parties hereto agree that the work, as set forth herein, will be performed by the City under the terms of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY LAKEHAVEN WATER& SEWER DISTRICT Jim Ferrell, Mayor John Bowman, General Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. Ryan Call, City Attorney Steven H. Pritchett, General Counsel ATTEST: Stephanie Courtney, CMC, City Clerk S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 5 Lakehaven Water&Sewer District Interlocal Agreement EXHBIT A ESTIMATED LAKEHAVEN WATER &SEWER DISTRICT COSTS ESTIMATED DESIGN COST Design Estimated design costs for District Work KPG, Inc.) $ 0.00 Lakehaven Water & Sewer District has contracted directly with an engineering design consultant (KPG, inc.) to provide plans and specifications for inclusion in the City Contract Documents. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS The proportionate Lakehaven Water& Sewer District(LWSD) percentage will be applied to the Schedule A Bid Items listed below. The LWSD percentage will be determined as follows: LWSD % = Schedule B Total Bid Amount Schedules A+ B Total Bid Amount *Note Schedule B Bid Amounts for this calculation do not include sales tax. Construction—Schedule A Shared Bid Items Mobilization (LWSD %) TBD Roadway Surveying (LWSD %) TBD As-Built Survey & Record Drawings (LWSD %) TBD Temporary Traffic Control (LWSD %) TBD Erosion Control &Water Pollution Prevention (LWSD %) TBD Material Testing (LWSD %) TBD Schedule A Shared Bid Items TBD Construction—Schedule B TBD Sales Tax @ 10.0% of Construction Cost—Schedule B TBD Schedule B Including Sales Tax TBD Subtotal—Schedule A Shared Bid Items TBD Subtotal—Schedule B Including Sales Tax TBD Subtotal—Construction TBD Construction Management (15% of Subtotal - Construction cost) TBD Estimated Construction Cost TBD ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTS Estimated Design Cost $0.00 Estimated Construction Cost TBD Subtotal TBD Project Administration (5% of Design & Construction Subtotal) TBD Total Estimated Cost TBD Note: Bid amounts from the selected contractor&actual costs incurred will be used to calculate the final cost due from the District for its portion of the District Work for reimbursement to the City. S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 6 Lakehaven Water&Sewer District Interlocal Agreement The following has been prepared based on 75%-level Design in order to provide an estimated cost for order-of-magnitude planning purposes. Actual costs will be determined after bid opening. ESTIMATED DESIGN COST Design Estimated design costs for District Work KPG, Inc.) $ 0.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS The proportionate Lakehaven Water& Sewer District(LWSD) percentage will be applied to the Schedule A Bid Items listed below. The LWSD percentage will be determined as follows: LWSD % = Schedule B Total Bid Amt = $243,351.50 = 19.23% Schedules A+ B Total Bid Amt $1,022,000 + $243,351.50 *Note Schedule B Bid Amounts for this calculation do not include sales tax. Construction—Schedule A Shared Bid Items Mobilization ($90,000 * 19.23%) $ 17,307.00 Roadway Surveying ($13,000 * 19.23%) $ 2,499.90 As-Built Survey& Record Drawings ($3,000 * 19.23%) $ 576.90 Temporary Traffic Control ($90,000 * 19.23%) $ 17,307.00 Erosion Control &Water Pollution Prevention ($8,000 x LWSD %) $ 1,538.40 Material Testing ($10,000 x LWSD %) $ 1,923-00 Schedule A Shared Bid Items $41,152.20 Construction—Schedule B $243,351.50 Sales Tax @ 10.0% of Construction Cost—Schedule B $ 24,335.15 Schedule B Including Sales Tax $267,686.65 Subtotal —Schedule A Shared Bid Items $ 41,152.20 Subtotal—Schedule B Including Sales Tax $267,6°6.65 Subtotal—Construction $308,838.85 Construction Management (15% of Subtotal - Construction cost) $ 46,325.83 Estimated Construction Cost $355,164.68 ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTS Estimated Design Cost $ 0.00 Estimated Construction Cost 355 164.68 Subtotal $355,164.68 Project Administration (5% of Design & Construction Subtotal) 17._753.23 Total Estimated Cost $372,922.91 S Dash Point Rd Sidewalk Improvements Page 7 Lakehaven Water&Sewer District Interlocal Agreement COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#: 5e ............ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:2019-2021 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY(NTS)PROGRAM-BID RESULTS POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize staff to reject the bid for 2019-2021 Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports,and authorization after rebidding the project? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: Oct 7,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Naveen Chandra P.E Senior Capital Engineer ti DEPT: Public Works - - _ _ _ Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memo dated October 7, 2019 Options Considered: 1) Authorize staff to reject the bid for 2019-2021 Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports, and authorization after rebidding the project. 2) Do not authorize staff to bid this project and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option 1 to the October 15,2019 City Council Consent Agenda for approval. MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: C Dunt Initial/Date Initial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the October 15, 2019 consent agenda for approval. Mark Koppa W, Committee Chair Jess son,Committee Member Hoang Trail,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to reject the bid for 2019-2021 Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award, further reports, and authorization after rebidding the project." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7,2019 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: EJ Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Directok&� FROM: Naveen Chandra,P.E., Senior Capital Engineer SUBJECT: 2019-2021 Neighborhood Traffic Safety(NTS)Program—Bid Results BACKGROUND: The Request for Proposal (RFB # 19-006) for the 2019-2021 Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program was published on August 28, 2019. The one bid was opened on September 17, 2019. See the attached Exhibit A, for Bid Tabulation Summary. Asphalt Patch Systems Inc, Puyallup WA was the only bidder who submitted the bid for the project. However, the unit prices quoted for comparable bid items are much higher(average of 109%increase)than the 2016-2017 NTS program contract. A comparison to previous contract is attached as Exhibit B—Previous Contract Unit Price Comparison. As Exhibit B indicates the current unit prices are substantially higher than previous 2016-2019 NTS, contract for comparable unit prices on comparable work items. There are no known market factors that would explain the extreme increase in pricing. To accept the current low bid would mean fewer work items per project could be funded, and perhaps fewer NTS projects could be undertaken within the annual $30,000 operating budget for contractor work. Therefore, Staff is recommending to reject the bid and re- bid the project late 2019 or early 2020. cc: Project File Day File EXHIBIT"A%BID TABULATION-2019-2021 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY(NTS)PROGRAM RFB NO.19-006 BID OPENING DATE 17-SEP-2019 Vendor Nam Asphalt Patch Systems,Inc Location Putallup,WA SCHEDULE A, Example of 'Typical"Projects As Described in Scope Item ypica Unit Unit Price Imultiphei Total B-3 Extruded Curb,Painted WSDOT Standard Specification Section 8-07 50 $100.00 50 $5,000.00 (except no rebar)COFW Development 'Standard 3-4A,COFW SP 8-04 LF B-7 Speed Hump,Complete(includes toe grind 4 $3,000.00 4 $12,000.00 and temporary markings.Permanent signing EA B-1 Traffic Circle Island,Complete(includes foot painted pre-cast curb,pavement removal, Diame 1 $18,700.00 1 $18,700.00 monument case&valve box adiustment. EA Total of Schedule A 535,700-00 Must be the same as Schedule B Price SCHEDULE B.(Discretionary Work Orders As Described in Scope of 1 Item uantity Rangi Unit Unit Price Multipliey Total° B-1 Pre-Cast Traffic Curb,Painted 50 100 LF 100.00 50 $5.000.00 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 8-07 101 5.00_ LF 80-00 101 $8.080.00 COFW Special Provision 8-07 501 + LF 60.00 501 D0.060.00 B-2 Block Traffic Curb,Painted 50 100 LF 100.00 50 $5,000.00 COFW Development Standard 3-4 101 500 LF 80.00 101 $8.080.00 COFW Special Provision 8-07 501 + I LF 60.00 501 $30,060.00 B-3 IExtruded Curb,Painted 50 100 LF 100.00 50 $5,000-00 WSDOT St.Spec.8-07,and St.Plan F-10.42(e 101 500 LF 50.00 101 $5,050.00 COFW Development Standard 3-4A,COFW SP 501 + LF 40.00 501 $20.040.00 B-4 Remove Pre-Cast,Block,or Extruded Curb 50 100 LF 60.00 50 $3,000.00 (include asphalt patching if necessary) 101 500 LF 40.00 101 $4,040-00 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 2- 501 + LF 30.00 501 $15.030.00 B-5 Crushed Surfacing Top Course,Include Haul 1 5 TONI 500.00 1 5500.1')0 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 4-04,9 6 15 TON 200.001 6 $1.200.00 COFW Special Provision 4-04 15 + TON 100.00 15 $1,500-00 B-6 HMA Class 1/2"PG 64-22 1 5 TON 500.00 1 $500.00 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 5-04 6 15 TON 300.00 6 51,800.00 COFW Special Provision 5-04 15 + TON 200.00 15 $3,000.00 R-7 Speed Hump,Complete(includes toe grind and temporary markings.Permanent signing 2 31 EA 6,500.00 2 $13,000.00 4 + EA 3,000.00 4 $12,000.00 B-8 Speed Table,Complete(includes toe grind $8,000.00 and temporary 1 EA 8,000.00 1 markings.Permanent signing and markings by 2 3 EA 5:000-00 2 $10,000 00 COFW Develo ment Standard 3-27A,COFW S 4 + EA 4,000.00 4 $16.00000 R-0 Raised Crosswalk,Complete(includes toe -E77-7177Mtil ��•r,:' grind and temporary markings.Permanent 2 3 EA 7,000-00 2 $1_1 00000 + rnA/ 4 + EA 6,000.00 4 $24.00000 BAC Remove Speed Hump,Speed Table,or Raise 1 EA 7,000-00 1 $7.00000 (include asphalt patching if necessary) 2 3 EA 6,000.00 2 $12,00000 COFW SP 2-02.3(3)(7) 4 + EA 5.000-00 4 :20.000 00 B-11 Pedestrian Refuge Island,Complete 1 EA 3.000.00 1 I 53.000.00 (includes detectable warning strips)COFW SP 2 3 EA 2,500.00 2 $5,000.00 COFW Development Standard 3-58 4 + EA 2,000.00 4 $8,000.00 B-1 Remove Pedestrian Refuge Islands,Complet 1 EA 2 500.00 1 $2.500 00 (include asphalt patching if necessary) 2 3 EA 2.000.00 2 54.000.00 COFW SP 2-02.3(3)(7) 4 + EA 1,500.00 4 $6,00000 B-1 Remove&Replace Concrete Curb Ramp,Co 1 EA 4,000.001 1 $4,00000 COFW Development Standard 3-8,3-8A,3-813,` 2 3 EA 3,200.00 2 $6,40000 WSDOT Std Plan F-40.14(Up to 25 ft.)COFW; 4 + EA 2.700.00 4 $10.80000 B-1dI Remove&Replace Concrete Sidewalk,Comp 5 10 SY 400.00 5 52.000.00 COFW Development Standard 3-3&3-12 11 50 SY 300.00 11 $3,300.00 COFW Special Provision 8-04.8-14 I 51 + SY 150.00 51 $7,650.00 B-15 Remove&Replace Concrete Curb&Gutter, 10 30 LF 200-00 10 i 52.000 00 Complete (includes sawcutting,disposal, 31 100 LF100.00 31 1 53.100.00 ashoalt oatchin COFW Dw 3-4,3-4A& 101 + LF 70.00, 101 ! $7.070.00 g_1 Traffic Circle Island,Complete(includes Diam. Quanti EA 15,000.00 1 $15,000.00 painted pre-cast curb,pavement removal, 17'-24' 1 EA 17.000.00, 1 $17,000.00 monument case&valve box adjustment, 15'-32' 1 E4 18,700.00 1 $18,700.00 Total of Schedule B $428,460.00 Adjusted Total of Schedule B a X 0.101 $42,846.00 Total Total of Schedule A+Adjusted Total of Schedule B $78,546.00 1I1 9/25/2019 EXHIBIT B - Previous Contract Unit Price Comparison 2019-2021 Bid 2016-17 Low Bidder REQUEST FOR BID Vendor Name: Asphalt Patch Systems.Inc Ton L•nd Pavin CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Date Prepared: .September 17,2010 February 12 2016 2019-2021 Neighborhood Traffic Safety(NTS)Program SCHEDULE A, Example of a"Typical"Project As Described Under Section VI-11 "Typical"Project 2019-2021 Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Multiplier Total Increase Unit Price Multiplier Total B-7 Speed Hump,Complete(includes toe grind and temporary markings.Permanent signing and markings by others.)COFW 2 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 $2,70000 2 $5,400.00 Development Standard 3-26 COFW P B-32 111 11% 8-9 Raised Crosswalk,Complete(includes toe grind and temporary markings.Permanent signing and markings by others.)COFW 1 $0.00 $3,400.00 1 $3,40000 Development Standar a-27.COFW SP 8-33 EA 8.165 Traffic Circle Island,Complete(includes painted pre-cast curb, pavement removal,monument case&valve box adjustment, 32-foot topsoil.Each(1)island by Circle Diameter range in feet) COFW Diameter 1 $18,700.00 $8,200.00 1 $8,200.00 $18.700 QO Development Standard 3-59,COFW SP 8-04 Circle 128% ................ _ $30.700 00 SC14EDULE 9.0scittionary Work Orders As Described Under Section VI-21 Item Multiplier Totals 2019-2021 Multiplier Totals Quantity Range Unit Unit Price Increase Unit Price S-1 Pre-Cast Traffic Curb,Painted 50 100 LF 50 $5,000.00 I 50 $2,25000 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 8-07 101 500 LF 101 $8,080.00 78% i0 101 $4,54500 COFW Special Provision 8-07 501 + LF 501 $30,060.00 58"s, 'i0 501 1 038.00 13-2 Block Traffic Curb,Painted 50 100 LF 50 $5,000.00 82% -0 50 $2,750.00 COFW Development Standard 34 101 500 LF 101 $8,080.00 67^,t 4800 101 $4,846.00 COFW Special Provision 8-07 501 + LF 501 $30.060,00 _331% 45 00 501 $22 545.00 8-3 Extruded Curb,Painted 50100 LF 100 00 50 $5,000,00 376t� CO 50 $1,050.00 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 8-07(except no 101 500 LF 50.00 101 $5,050.00 213% OD 101 $1,616.00 rebar COFW Develo ment Standard 34 COFW SP 8-07 501 + LF 40.00 501 $20,040,00 233% 1200 501 $6,012.00 $i Remove Pre-Cast,Block,or Extruded Curb(Include as.phall 50 100 LF 60.00 50 $3,000.001 500% 10 00 50 $500.00 patching if necessary)WSDOT Standard Specification Section 2- 101 500 LF 4000 101 $4,040.00 344% 9.00 101 $909.00 CO3FdS?1-C7 501 + LF 30.00 501 $15,030.00 275% 800 501 $4008.00 B-5 Crustied SurfamnU Top Course,Include Haul 1 5 TON 50000 1 $500.00 5251$ 8000 1 $80.00 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 4-04,9-03 6 15 TON 200.00 6 $1,200.00 344% 4500 6 $270..00 COFW S tical Proviau,,4,J,• 15+ TON �300 15 $1,500.00 :33°, 3000 15 $450.00 B-6 HMA Class 1/2"PG 6422 1 5 7ON 1 $500.00 43% 35000 1 $350.00 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 5-04 6 15 TON 6 $1,600.00 Owl 30000 6 $1,800.00 COFW Special Provision 54-1 15+ TON 1 $3.000,00 -26% 270.00 15 $4 050.00 B-7 Speed Hump,Complete(includes toe grind and temporary 1 CA 1 $10,000.00 270% _70 00 1 ,70 . markings.Permanent signing and markings by others.)COFW 2 3 EA .00.00 2 $13,000.00 141% 2.700;00 2 $5,400.00 wlo ri:ini 5'a-dCO FW SP 8.12 4+ EA 10 00 4 $12,000.00 11% 2 700 00 4 $10.800-00 B-8 Speed T,ble,Complete i.rc odes toe grind and temporary 1 EA 8.000.00 1 $8,000.00 167%] 3.00000 1 $3,000.00 markings Permanent signing and markings by others.) 2 3 EA 5-00000 2 $10,000.00 6K% 3.000.00 2 $6,000.00 C.OF'N Oeveld inert Slnnd,ud 3-27A.COFW SP 8-a3 4+ EA 4.000,001 a $16.000.00 21% 3300 00 4 $13.200.00 B-9 Raised Crosswalk,Complete mc.u:f=-,me pend and temporary 1 EA 10.am Da 1 10,00 . 0 -174/o 3.400.00 1 $3.400.00 markings.Permanent signing and markings by others.)COFW 2 3 EA 7.00700 2 $14,000.00 106% 340000 2 $6,800-00 Development 5'il,Jn,d 3 2" COP"q SF'8a:i 4.+ EA 600000 a $24.00090 76% 3,40000 4 $13.00-00 8-10 Remove Speed Hump,Speed Table,or Raised Crosswalk 1 EA 7,00000 1 $7,000N 289% 1,800.00 1 $1,800.00 (include asphalt patching if necessary)COFW SP 8-04 2 3 EA 6.000.00 2 $12,000.00 233% 1.80000 2 $3,600.00 WSDOT Stand,.-_, Sec:•on 2.013(3) 4+ EA 5.000.00 4 $20 00_00 1 178% 1.800.00 4 $7,200-00 8-11 Pedestrian Refuge Island,Complete(includes detectable warning 1 EA 3.000.00 1 $3,000.00 -76%; 12.500 00 1 $12,500.00 strips)COFW SP 8-04 2 3 EA 2.500.00 2 $5,000.00 -80% 12.500.00 2 $25,000.00 COFW Development Standard 3-58 4+ EA 2.000.00 4 $8,000.00 -84% 12,500.00 4 $50.000-00 B-12 Remove Pedestrian Refuge Islands,Complete 1 EA 2.500.00 1 $2,500.00 -57% 580000 1 $5,800-00 (include asphalt patching if necessary)COFW SP 8-04 2 3 EA 2.000.00 2 $4,000.00 -66% 5,800 00 2 $11,600-00 WSDOT Standard Specification Section 2-02,3(3) 4+ EA 1,500 00 4 $6,000.00- -74% 5,800 00 4 $23.200.00 8-13 Remove&Replace Concrete Curb Ramp,Complete 1 EA 4.000.00 1 $4,000.00 8% 3,700,00 1 $3,700.00 COFW Development Standard 3-8,3-8A,3-86,3-10,3-10A,3-11, 2 3 EA 3,200.00 2 $6,400.00 -14% 3.700,00 2 $7,400.00 WSDOT Std Plan F40.14 Un to 25 it COFW SP 8-04 8-14 4+ EA 1 2,700.00 4 $10,800,00 -27% 3,70000 4 $14,800-00 B-14 Remove&Replace Concrete Sidewalk,Complete 5 10 V 400.00 5 $2,000.00 -71% 1:.375.00 5 $6,875.00 COFW Development Standard 3-3&3-12 11 50 SY 2021.00 1 $3,300.00 33% 225.00 11 $2,475.00 COFW Special Provision 8-04.8-14 1 + SY 150.00 1 $7,65000 -25% 20000 51 $10,200.00 B-15 Remove&Replace Concrete Curb&Gutter,Complete 10 30 LF 200-Q0 10 $2,000.00 100% 100.00 10 $1,000.00 (includes sawcutting,disposal,ashpalt patching)COFW Dwg 34,3 31 100 LF 100.00 31 $3,100.00 25% 80.00 31 $2,480.00 4A&WSDOT Sind Spec.5-042(141,COFW SP 8-04 101• LF 70.00 101 $7 070.00 0% 70.00 101 $7,070.00 B-16r Traffic Circle Island,Complete(includes painted precast curb, Diam. Ouanti pavement removal,monument case&valve box adjustment, 101-16, 1 EA 15..00000 1 $15,000.00 121% 6,800 001 1 $6,600.00 topsoil-Each(1)island by Circle Diameter range in feet) COFW 17'-24' 1 EA 17.000 CC t $17,000.00 133% 7.300 00 1 $7,300.00 ngyploi2ment Standard _54. -4 25'-32' 1 EA 18.700 00 18 700.00 128°/a 8.200.00 1 $8.200.00 109°' Average Increase of 2019.21 Low Bid Unit Cost over previous contracts 1/1 9/25/2019 . ._....... .. 5f COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October15,2019 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO APPLYFOR STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE GRANT IN SUPPORT OF DEVELOPING A CITY HOUSIN(3 ACTION PLAN(E2SHB 1923 FUNDS) POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way seek a State Department of Commerce grant in the development of its Housing Action Plan? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation MEETING DATE: Oct. 7,2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Doc Hansell. Plammn« Nlaiia'ei- DEPT: Community Development Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: Permit Grant Authorization Reject Grant Application Authorization MAYOR'S RECOMMENDAT ON: Approve Autho•, tion to Seek Monies from E2SHB 1923 .......... J MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �+- '�/�' Lamm' er ceuncil .14 Initial/Date Ini[iai ate InitiaVDntC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward authorization to Community Development to apply for monies from the State Department of Commerce to the October I5,-2019 consent agenda for approval. Council Me r Mark Kopp C cll Member Jesse Johnson Council Member Hoang Tran Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of authorization to Community Development to apply for monies from the State Department of Commerce in Development of a City Housing Action Plan. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# 40k CITY OF Federal Way LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE STAFF RVPORT DATE: October 7, 2019 To: LUTC Chair,Mark Koppang Brian Davis, Community Development Director � -- FROM: Robert"Doc"Hansen,Planning Manager -;� . SUBJECT: Request to Apply for State E2SHB 1923 Funds I. Introduction In the last State legislative session,the Senate and House of Representatives passed a bill authorizing the State's Department of Commerce to distribute five million dollars($5,000,000)to cities in the State planning under the Growth Management Plan to either adopt various land use actions or a Housing Action Plan, actions of which are designed to enhance residential building capacity. This grant opportunity is prioritized in the bill for cities with populations over 20,000.Based upon population estimates provided by the state Office of Financial Management(OFM), a list of fifty-three cities, including the City of Federal Way,meets this obligation. As directed by the bill,the Department of Commerce has developed a grant program to ensure that grant funds awarded are proportionate to the level of effort proposed by the City. Funding is offered in advance of, and to support, adoption of policies or ordinances developed. II. Request Amongst a number of activities that are eligible for funding under this bill include researching and developing goals and policies for creation of an active Housing Action Plan. The City is responsible for review and update of its current Comprehensive Plan in 2023. One of the elements of the Comprehensive Plan required by the Growth Management Act includes a Housing Element. The activities and policies adopted by this effort can, and will,be used to development this required element. If approved for application,the staff within the Department of Community Development will apply for a grant of approximately$100,000,monies of which will go to the City for: • the administration of the grant, • the development of a Request for Proposal(RFP)to obtain a qualified consulting firm to create the plan to be reviewed by the City, • the creation and administration of a public involvement program, and • the adoption of a plan agreed upon by City decision makers. If the grant is accepted, a resolution will be brought back before the Council for approval to receive such monies. COUNCILMEETING DATE: October 151h,2019 ITEM............... ........... #:4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY HALL FRONT DOOR REPLACEMENT POLICY QUESTION: Should council award a contract in the amount of $24,954.60 to HTR Glass & Construction to replace the City Hall main entry doors and ADA accessible opener? COMMITTEE: PRHSPSC MEETING DATE: 10/8/2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Jason H. Gerwen, Parks & Facilities Manager DEPT: Parks Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: 1. Award a contract to HTR Glass & Construction to replace the City Hall main entry doors and ADA accessible opener and use budgeted funds to make the purchase. 2. Do not award a contract to HTR Glass & Construction to replace the City Hall main entry doors and ADA accessible opener and provide staff direction. MAYOR'S RRC NINIEN TION: Option#1 MAYOR APPROVAL' D[RECTOR APPROVAL: Cur mitten Council lni[ia ate Initial/Date InitialfnD COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move to forward the contract award to HTR Glass & Construction to the October 15`", 2019 consent agenda for approval." mittee Chair Committee Member Com I e Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to award a contract to approval to HTR Glass & Construction in the amount of$24,954.60 to replace the replace the City Hall main entry doors and ADA accessible opener." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# 1° CITY OF Federal DATE: September 25, 2019 To: PRHSPS Committee FROM: Jason H. Gerwen, Parks & Facilities Manager RE: City Hall main entry doors and ADA accessible opener Financial implications: During the April budget adjustment Council approved funds to replace the City Hall and ADA accessible opener in the amount of$25,000. Background: The Parks & Facilities division has been aware that the front doors at City Hall and ADA accessible opener have been failing over the past couple of years. Facilities maintenance staff has responded to over two dozen work orders to resolve various issues with the automatic opener, hinges, threshold and the exit devices. We have had several different door companies out to assist staff to make repairs and keep them operational with varying success. We have made all of the repairs possible but are now out of options and run the risk of the doors completely failing which would leave City Hall unsecure. Therefore the doors now need to be replaced. Staff contacted several companies to request bid/quotes. Several of them were too busy, didn't want the work or did not return calls or respond. Of the two companies that submitted bids the price difference, ability and past history lead us to select HGR Glass &Construction to provide the materials and labor to install. Bid Results: HTR Glass &Construction: $20, 416.00 Niemen Glass: $26,051.00 Hollow Metal Specialties: No Response Rainier Glass: No Bid Vortex Industries: No Bid Available Budget: $ 25,000.00 Recommendation: City Council to award a contract to HTR Glass & Construction in the amount of$24,954.60 to replace HTR Glass &Construction COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#: 5h CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VALLEY NARCOTICS ENFORCEMENT TEAM(VNET)/U.S.DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION(DEA)HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA(HIDTA)TASK FORCE AGREEMENTS. POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way/Federal Way Police Department enter into an Agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration to continue efforts to stop the COMMITTEE:PRHS&PS MEETING DATE: Oct. 8, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other- STAFF ther-STAFF REPORT BY:LYNETTE ALLEN,CHIEF'S OFFICE MANAGER DEPT: Police Department Attachments: 1. PRHS&PS Committee Memo 2. Drug Enforcement Administration MOU 3. State and Local HIDTA Task Force Agreement—Appendix F 4. U.S. Department of Justice — Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements. Options Considered: 1. Accept the DEA MOU, State &Local HIDTA Agreement& Certifications 2. Reject the DEA MOU, State & Local HIDTA Agreement& Certifications MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 —Accept DEA MOU,HIDTA & Certificates MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: —.7 C«nmi 11re icmilcil Initial COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move to forward the proposed Agreements to the October IS, 2019 Council can nt agenda for approval. " onllnittee Chair Committee Member Colli }httfe Membe Plt POSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the Drug Enforcement Administration MOU and HIDTA Agreement between the City of Federal Way /Federal Way Police Department and the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, and authorize the Chief of Police to execute said Agreements." t BELOIV TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED 1ST reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT DATE: October 8, 2019 TO: Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Andy J. Hwang, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team (VNET) /U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) HIDTA Task Force Agreements Narcotics and dangerous drugs have a detrimental effect on the health and well-being of not only the Citizens in Federal Way,but all people throughout Washington and beyond. The US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) formed a local Task Force to help stop the trafficking of narcotics and dangerous drugs. The Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team (VNET) was established to create and maintain a multi- jurisdictional team to effectively investigate and enforce the laws relating to controlled substances. This Agreement designates the equitable sharing which the law enforcement participating agencies must acknowledge. In reference to Appendix F,the Federal Way Police Department(FWPD)assigned a Commissioned Officer to the DEA Task Force on February 8, 2010 and FWPD entered into an Agreement with the State and Local HIDTA for the reimbursement of overtime for the Officer. The attached appendix F is a continuation of our efforts to control the trafficking of drugs. This Agreement is effective October 1,2019 through September 30,2020 and reimburses FWPD for the Officer's overtime up to $18,649.00. 1 Drug Enforcement Administration Asset Forfeiture Sharing Memorandum of Understanding This agreement is made this 1St day of October, 2019, between the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration Enforcement (hereinafter "DEA"), and the Federal Way Police Department (hereinafter "FWPD"). 1. The police agencies participating in the Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 Task Force, hereby agree to the following terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") governing the Task Force's equitable sharing requests and participation in the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") Equitable Sharing Program: The following are the Task Force Participants and their contribution to the Task Force: Participating Agency Contribution Auburn Police Department 1 TFO Federal Way Police Department 1 TFO Kent Police Department 1 TFO Port of Seattle Police Department 1 TFO Renton Police Department 1 TFO Seattle Police Department 1 TFO Tukwila Police Department 1 TFO Washington State Patrol 1 TFO 2. Participants acknowledge that equitable sharing is at the discretion of the Attorney General and not guaranteed in any case. Participants acknowledge that sharing will not be awarded in a case if victims have not been fully compensated. State, local, or federal government entities can be considered victims. Equitable sharing among the Task Force members shall be based upon the following pre-arranged percentages: DEA shall receive 20% Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team Shall receive 80% *The equitable sharing will be disbursed per the agreed upon MOU signed by all the parent agencies participating in the Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team Task Force. 3. Participants understand that if a non-MOU member receives an equitable share based upon their contribution, then the MOU Participants' shares shall be reduced proportionately (e.g., if non-MOU agency C receives 10% based upon their contribution, then the MOU Participants' pre-arranged percentages shall be based upon 90% of the full amount available for sharing). 4. Participants further understand that additional adjustments may be necessary so to ensure that DEA (DOJ) receives a minimum of 20%. 5. Participants further understand that the federal decision-makers on each equitable sharing request retain discretion to modify percentages as deemed appropriate based on the facts and circumstances in each case. For the Drug Enforcement Administration: Date: Keith Weis Special Agent in Charge For the Federal Way Police Department: Date: Andy Hwang Chief of Police 2 Appendix F STATE AND LOCAL HIDTA TASK FORCE AGREEMENT This agreement is made this 1St day of October 2019, between the United States Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (hereinafter "DEA"), and the Federal Way Police Department (hereinafter "FWPD"). The DEA is authorized to enter into this cooperative agreement concerning the use and abuse of controlled substances under the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 873. Whereas there is evidence that trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs exists in the Greater King County area and that such illegal activity has a substantial and detrimental effect on the health and general welfare of the people of Washington,the parties hereto agree to the following: 1. The Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 Task Force will perform the activities and duties described below: a. disrupt the illicit drug traffic in the Greater King County area by immobilizing targeted violators and trafficking organizations; b. gather and report intelligence data relating to trafficking in narcotics and dangerous drugs; and c. conduct undercover operations where appropriate and engage in other traditional methods of investigation in order that the task force's activities will result in effective prosecution before the courts of the United States and the State of Washington. 2. To accomplish the objectives of the Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 Task Force, the FWPD agrees to detail (1) experienced officer(s) to the Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 Task Force for a period of not less than two years. During this period of assignment, the FWPD officers will be under the direct supervision and control of DEA supervisory personnel assigned to the task force. 3. The FWPD officers assigned to the task force shall adhere to all DEA policies and procedures. Failure to adhere to DEA policies and procedures shall be grounds for dismissal from the task force. 4. The FWPD officers assigned to the task force shall be deputized as task force officers of DEA pursuant to 21 USC 878. 10/2019 5. To accomplish the objectives of the Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 Task Force DEA will assign (3) Special Agents to the task force. FWPD and DEA anticipate that funding of the Task Force may be provided by HIDTA to cover costs to include: office space, travel funds, office supplies, purchase of evidence and information, investigative equipment, training and other support items. HIDTA funding is subject to annual approval of the HIDTA Executive Board and to annually appropriated funds for the HIDTA program. 6. During the period of assignment to the Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 Task Force the FWPD will remain responsible for establishing the salaries and benefits, including overtime, of the FWPD officers assigned to the task force and for making all payments due them. Funding for reimbursement to the Valley Narcotics Enforcement Team "VNET" on behalf of the Federal Way Police Department for overtime incurred by Task Force officers may come from HIDTA subject to annual approval of the HIDTA Executive Board and to annually appropriated funds for the HIDTA program. This does not exclude the possibility of overtime reimbursement funding from additional sources. Overtime reimbursement shall not exceed a sum equivalent to 25 percent of the salary of a GS-12, Step 1 (RUS) federal employee, currently $18,649.00, per officer. Note: Task Force Officer's overtime "Shall not include any costs for benefits, such as retirement, FICA, and other expenses." 7. In no event will Federal Way Police Department charge any indirect cost rate to DEA for the administration or implementation of this agreement. 8. FWPD shall maintain on a current basis complete and accurate records and accounts of all obligations and expenditures of funds under this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and instructions provided by DEA to facilitate on-site inspection and auditing of such records and accounts. 9. FWPD shall permit and have readily available for examination and auditing by DEA, the United States Department of Justice, the Comptroller General of the United States, and any of their duly authorized agents and representatives, any and all records, documents, accounts, invoices, receipts or expenditures relating to this agreement. FWPD shall maintain all such reports and records until all litigation, claim, audits and examinations are completed and resolved, or for a period of three (3) years after termination of this agreement, whichever is later. 10. FWPD shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations of the United States Department of Justice implementing those laws, 28 C.F.R. Part 42, Subparts C, F, G, H and I. 11. FWPD agrees that an authorized officer or employee will execute and return to DEA the attached OJP Form 4061/6, Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and drug-Free Workplace Requirements. FWPD acknowledges that this agreement will not take effect and no federal funds will be awarded until the completed certification is received. 10/2019 12. When issuing statements, press releases requests for proposals, bid solicitations and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or part with federal money, FWPD shall clearly state: (1) percentage of the total cost of the program or project which will be financed with federal money and (2) the dollar amount of federal funds for the program or project. 13. FWPD and DEA may request that funding be provided by HIDTA to provision Task Force Officers with leased vehicles suitable for surveillance, installation of mobile radios in the HIDTA Task Force vehicles, fuel, and routine maintenance. Procedures for reporting and investigating automobile accidents involving Official Government Vehicles (OGV'S) shall apply to accidents involving the leased vehicles furnished to the FWPD personnel, in addition to whatever accident reporting requirements FWPD may have. 14. While on duty and acting on task force business,the FWPD officers assigned to the HIDTA task force shall be subject to all DEA and federal government rules, regulations and procedures governing the use of OGV's for home to work transportation and for personal business. DEA acknowledges that the United States is liable for the actions of a task force officer, while on duty and acting within the scope of their federal employment, to the extent permitted by the Federal Torts Claim Act. 15. The term of this agreement shall be effective from the date in paragraph number one until September 30, 2020. This agreement maybe terminated by either party on 30 days advance written notice. Billing for all outstanding obligations must be received by DEA within 90 days of the date of termination of this agreement. For the Drug Enforcement Administration: Date: Name: Keith Weis Title: Special Agent in Charge (SAC) For the Federal Way Police Department Date: Name: Andy Hwang Title: Chief of Police 10/2019 r' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this from. Signature of this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, "New Restrictions on Lobbying"and 28 CFR Part 67,"Government-wide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement)and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace(Grants)."The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. LOBBYING PL LI:C l "F'cra1, State, Ir!r ,!] lrans<<rtirn r.1 :nnhacl under a i.1 bel "tr n LucI V OLItlr-1 Fed ISI er Slate antitrust As req!.ired by Section 1352, Ti*,e s: r the. 0 ti Corle an;J i ilutr s [rnl7iisilr l o' erluetcl 171 rl' 1 ea forgery, d,111 1 t ! 11 Section, Part 'C Ir 1 `, L 1 e•11PI ny rltn far: briber, II 1f1Car rl i .tlue 1 1 ;if I,LU7'dS 1 21.1ng alse u C_ a ILI t1,re , [,e2rnent ue 1C 1 15u 3s defl LJ at 28 uFR slate ,enIS, o rnrr r�nr lola7m [)1-lf�crly Fart 9 Ih, :a: scant certlfir S:lici l a1 `Ju erjz cl g Ite f.1n s nave t,� m he 1 l Art u+1 pie ertly 1n I1 ie F rr othc. its rum n.l11y of Civilly p P [ all hat; "I Iy a go _r.,i-eI e y ,Federal M � OF k,c•71) VVIth f y+ 6` Jr bcI•,3 F U [I ILryIJr U t, _Irly rS011 lur CI'iul=I Crla cn'mini si n rlf goy ,)I II y offenses enumerated rn paragraph (t) n1 allele[t11 ,1 in[1uem,e all 1J°iiccr _.i emV)lovtr c' :ny ajer;.I,_ (b) of thisruillfcalion.ar.J cembF, ri' r:qn ;• r:n affic=i ar -•mp"layrr-I.-r. .7f Cnr.c.; ss. or II,,1Vee L rdie L f I I.IJn 1.es in 'I' e L 1 v)i h the nr l onv rdl r r 1 r fl-,c nt r nr into any (d) Haul rot If 11 G 1 r v ar period receding thljapplication c. r 1 � u n+ e� r "or r crl".�i Jiliori ren-J-*I, mad o1 or mora u il l c lr 1 msactrons Federal, Sta or local) 111 -rn'. .,r ,...1 r•,...,,. 1 f ry F-dc. gl J r.rt �., r.f.:.r�,tl vu termimv, .I F,c.-;,:,ti ,;1r Tera 1. ,;,:rid B ,Mhere the a•np;icanl is unable to c rtify to an V of the stat;ments in this :c.1n11cation, he or she shall attach an r; V F,ll- 1 ar tl rl [ rl l r I-19ve been e:C,I ration to this a[)F]'Ir tori In il.:C•`1C?' a:'I .r1:_:r --•'lp. ::er ar•y� tlr:ari;;v fr1enibei o! ;r"_ I r :r r11 1 .'. •1 r .'r d 1 erT1[;II yr t7i 1 n c�1 1;.rj13. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE rr ll rn ,+. I r nm nl I L-11 curnpiclr and (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) sl !+n 11{ 1.'a lr 9r:1 FmrFri - 11 i,e of Lor my:n❑ 1::v11ea 1r'ac'crJ lr r.1tl: uc 1_+r As rL n d by [he Drug l"ree -kplace Act of 1988. and nl�le mr ntee: at .'; CFR r'a t 67. S i_zoart F, for acantees, as d rlredal 2 CFR Part a acctlrrls 67.615 and-67,62D- fifiii:-rile unders,ar:+,c: shall require th :; the Iarint,agge of this cer- cal.io1 be inclJse"J in the award daCL:ments f_u alrsubawards at A Tpe apglica It c tifies that it will or will continue to provide a .111 tl-rs [:ncludlnr; ; ,bnr nts, corlt'acls under grants and drug-reew rkpface, y: o.-operative ac:"et_ih,its•`and subcontracts) and that all sub- eclp:errs s:halfcerfiiy aril disclose accord•ii ly. (a) P:ihllslminqar'ua statomc 1t ncllylriq e111ufcryees that [I-s: u 11av t it ,a :e stnciijhor, t1,: n5 nr;. possessll or use '_t a corn ,le'd . 1L ..': 1: pr_,nibil..lt u' the y: nt +:'s 22.EgDEB MENT P N ION,AND OTHER wo*place arid specltyinr? the a -1orls that '.4111 bm takeri aq-a�rr�' (DIRPCT�'1 N11 1 i�i-r R eniployees for violation o such,prohibition, E (b� Establiihin%an on-going drug-free awareness program to As required by. Ex i O 1 r p , cot and In orm emp oye s about- s 1; ,I r mr, anrf Imt;ll n rG�t CI 1 Fr" 67 ,y r [ yrspe tive [,11;nd'y v le ll a Iia r1 1 3, aS J_rl1 ,[1 a 18 GFR mart 6 1 Section�i7.510- (1)The dangers of drugs abuse in the workplace; A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: (2)The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; a3� ApA available druga counseling, rehabilitation, and employee (a) . . e not nresfrntly debar"cd st;Sneirdo ( oropow.-d fcr deoar- sls ce programs; n nr=ra, rlec Arad 1 leligiL l sen[e`lc+t to a deri:j -Y acral bel P y a Stste „ i- r eia t1 r.jrlly utter Irr rtt 4� The Penalties that ma be imposed ar][rn employees for drug ena c u 'l rsG 1 ii 1a y J i r '.1ral eil.F:arrrn rl or ragcl cy, �tfuse violations occur in the workplace, c• rn �c) Making it a 1 a allf-rnttnt that each employee to be eniga ed in (b) H-,v ,t withll- a Ihlee vm gr h= lar QF cedlnq 1hi ,ppl n "on he [ m1 rlanr o 'he grant be given a copy of the sat ment beet coiivicted of or had a civil Iudgrt C l r,:•IUeied 7 llrlS ,ire rl re=_lur e,, by par grapr"I ca}, mcriminal for commission of fraud or a crinal offense In conA!ciion with obtaining,attempting to obtain,or performing a (d) hlotri�inq the employe in the statement rreeqq'' tied by PP�]Iraora;�'t' {a' [t•.at,as a cond�tion of employment undert e grant, tl Cr fill pl uyl?e'wl11- .i);d('by the m" of lhe a[A Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 wiiiinc,, of his ur hor conviction for inn ofi'-� 7111-111,a, t�� occ�jrrinq in the workplace ng 1 300 5th Ave, suite 1300 Inter e I t-1�'9 F I I-, JHVS 3"'ei "11�."h Seattle, WA 98104 ',e) N,,ifvirq [he acency ir )riiirg vmfi r I0. caier,Iar days after receiv Ill notice (d 2) '-r)r,.- an employeeIf there are worknince onfile [hat are not Identified L, Check r 111OV kc r S L)I C J f) __'k G 1'. D I:D V C,E2 S I I W li-,10MdL� ViCe. IIC"LJdir_(, Derarinir-',nt of ice 1 Glii r b1 Joislicb C.g'l T N ItFCP Dzis�. 633 II1JIaI)@ AVer-LJC, NY,' Section 67, 630 of the flii'a watilca *,ha[ is I uli Qe shall I I idu de lite ideni I .�a ho I I let f I I a-V e le(A Io m'AUo-iL- ctf I�a lio I,I n e AtT FL,derJ fii sc al avant;-,q n t u�a, A,-m-A Y of W hir.I-I S h-".J I d I J e, 11"7 1,J vv i!I-I C.n 2 Lag I I I ,:r�s)of each affi� r C e P L,C71111,-,111 Gf .,LJSIICe ILJ,-ICJil'Q. States and SIale m a v(.,,I e d louse iJP Fora 4061 r i rine of follw.vnq actions, within 30 calendar duyak-;: sub r- if the State has elected to complete OJP Form ;eceivinq ;Uce L.':!, actions, (d)(2), with respect to any emiJI--,yee who is so convigied- Check 4061/7, (1+ Takir-1 aporljoli . s: , ;:-.-(ion _,j a n sl su�,h an C't:, Uji 1C @'IJ III 1'� .......1) kon _;;I sI .lith the DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE rcqriirernents of trie I-_lon fact of .W3,as arn'onc;-A,or (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS) (2) Requirirci cjc-I 'o ��. tisfactnlIIV In cl alr,_iR As requireo by the Dm Free rA1qFkpIaqe,Act of '1988 and - �Ilalr'[A� :I wh'-Ii-i:11a�11 r. ;�FFJKJi�!-x aF?PFQVr',1 f d rt 7, Subpart b rt � -es, as abi.,�- 'P�I_ . - Or ��LJC iniplFji I e �t 28 CFR a forniw.t? purr n'.-, h" �i -�t,,JQ-:-11, 1 _�cGI ealth, law enforce ment, defined a t 28 F P Part 67� ecbo ris 67.915 and 67.620 or!2-thor a pi:1-1-)r Ii.--I le F!,- A � I "onditinn i-.f the craqf. I -eFtifV halt 1 0,1:1-IOt engage in (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free th�. uni,3viftil penscj, p�)s,,ession workplace through implementation of paragraphs(a), (b),(c), (d), or LISE Qf a co-i Med substance in cl-'11dition arly activity with (e),and(f). gr j,1 t;an d B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site B if convinced of a criminal drugq offense resulting frim a erformance of work done In connection with the 1--y tv, 1 "2 (s) for the p V!01� 0 C',�_'L,IT I n q IJ U 1:1 111c, of 3 rant acti% specift grant: 10:�poil Hhe L'I I 11"'Y'l III"I YYII 111 0 ijar".I idd I 'tij V-� o� I I 1�1 conn c�,c,n, I c, E,e,)a rtnie:i-I of ic e o1 J jS tic- Priu:I EJ Plare' of Performance (Street address, city, country, state, zip AT-IN on[r o; I -,i 3 3 1 nd I a n,-i Ave��i u u. N'N, 'Na s;I I n g t�I I I, code) D C "'CI"3.I As the duly authorized representative of the applicant,I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications. 1. Grantee Name and Address: Federal Way Police Department 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way, WA 98003 2. Application Number and/or Project Name 3, Grantee lRSNendor Number Seattle Enforcement Group D-22 4, Typed Name and Title of Authorized Representative Andy Hwang, Chief of Police - Federal Way Police Department 5. Signature 6. Date COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#: I CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:RESOLUTION:ENCOURAGING INVESTMENTS IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING THROUGH SALES AND USE TAX IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF 2019,CHAPTER 338(SHB 1406) POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council adopt a Resolution declaring the intent to adopt legislation to authorize a sales and use tax for affordable and supportive housing in accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338? COMMITTEE: Parks, Recreation,Human Services, &Public Safety MEETING DATE: October 8, 2019 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ® Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Sarah Bridgeford DEPT: CD/CS Attachments: Staff Report Resolution Options Presented: 1. Approve the proposed resolution. 2. Do not approve the proposed resolution and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'SRECOMh9END TION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: � Of d DIRECTOR APPROVAL: / tarnmltCe Cum i t InitiaUDate InitiaUDate COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move to forward the proposed resolution to the October 15, 2019 consent agenda for approval." ,Viffommittee Chair Committee Member Com Vee Membe PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the proposed resolution.". (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: City Council Members VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION: Encouraging Investments in Affordable Housing and Supportive Housing through Sales and Use Tax in accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (SHB 1406) Financial Impacts: Adopting the sales and use tax allowed by Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 —Affordable and supportive housing—local sales and use tax(Substitute House Bill 1406)will add a revenue source dedicated to addressing affordable and supportive housing needs in the City. The adopted sales and use tax will be deducted from the existing sales tax so that there will not be an increase in sales and use taxes. Background information: On July 2, 2019, Community Services Manager Sarah Bridgeford provided the Council with an update on Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 and recommended moving forward with a resolution of intent and subsequent ordinance in the fall. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the program and request that Council pass a resolution of intent to participate in the program. Laws of 2019, Chapter 338. Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 was enacted in 2019 to encourage investments in affordable housing and/or supportive housing. The revenue sharing program does not increase sales tax, but instead allows for the City of Federal way to recapture a portion of the existing sales tax to use it in the following ways: • Acquiring, rehabilitating, or constructing affordable housing; • Funding operations and maintenance costs of new units; or • For cities with populations fewer than 100,000, provide rental assistance. The revenue will be capped based on fiscal year 2019, which ended on June 30, 2019. The estimates based on 2018 sales tax would provide $124,142 to Federal Way for eligible uses. The bill includes the ability for cities to recapture a larger portion of the sales tax (0.0146%) if the City has implemented a qualifying local tax; otherwise the Rev.7/18 second 0.0073%will be available to King County, which has passed a resolution of intent and ordinance implementing the tax on August 28, 2019. Qualifying taxes. There are four qualifying taxes to access a larger portion of the sales tax recapture provided in Laws of 2019, Chapter 338. The City of Federal Way is not authorized to impose the tax provided by RCW 82.14.460 as King County has already imposed the tax. Two of the taxes are property taxes allowed by RCW 84.52.105 and RCW 84.55.050. The final option is a sales tax increase of 1/10 of 1%to be used for affordable housing as permitted by RCW 82.14.530. At this time, a qualifying tax is not being recommended. Resolution of intent. Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 went into effect on July 28, 2019. To participate, the City must pass a resolution of intent within six months of the effective date. Length of time. The tax may be in place for up to 20 years. Pooling of funds with South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP). There is discussion among SKHHP participants and tentative agreement that pooling of funds will provide the most effective means by which to invest in affordable housing. More information will be provided as SKHHP continues its discussion. Prioritizing use of the funds. Should Council pass the resolution of intent and a subsequent ordinance, staff will prepare policies and recommendation for prioritizing use of the funds for Council consideration. Rev.7/18 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City of Federal Way,Washington,declaring the intent of the City council to adopt legislation to authorize a sales and use tax for affordable and supportive housing in accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (Substitute House Bill 1406). WHEREAS, in the 2019 Regular Session, the Washington State Legislature approved, and the Governor signed, Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (Substitute House Bill 1406) and WHEREAS, Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 authorize the governing body of a city to impose a local sales and use tax for acquiring, habilitating, or constructing affordable housing, including facilities providing supportive housing services, and for the operations and maintenance costs of affordable or supportive housing, and/or, if eligible, for providing rental assistance to tenants; and WHEREAS,the tax will be deducted from the state sales taxes collected within the City and, therefore, will not result in higher sales and use taxes within the City and will represent revenue dedicated to addressing housing needs in the City; and WHEREAS,the tax must be used to assist persons whose income is at or below sixty percent of the median income; and WHEREAS,in order for a city or county to impose the tax,within six months of the effective date of Laws of 2019, Chapter 338, or by January 31, 2020, the governing body must adopt a resolution of intent to authorize the maximum capacity of the tax, and within twelve months of the effective date of Laws of 2019,Chapter 338,or by July 28,2020,must adopt legislation to authorize the maximum capacity of the tax; and WHEREAS, this resolution constitutes the resolution of intent required by Laws of 2019, Chapter 338; and Resolution No. 19- Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS,the City Council now desires to declare its intent to impose a local sales and use tax as authorized by Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Resolution of Intent. The City Council declares its intent to adopt legislation to authorize the maximum capacity of the sales and use tax authorized by Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 within one year of the effective date of Laws of 2019, Chapter 338, or by July 27, 2020. Section 2. Severability. If any section,sentence,clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this resolution are authorized to make necessary corrections to this resolution including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, resolution numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 4. Ratification.Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5.Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON this day of , 20_. Resolution No. 19- Page 2 of 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: JIM FERRELL, MAYOR ATTEST: STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. RYAN CALL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: Resolution No. 19- Page 3 of 3 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#: 6a . .... ....... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the Community Development Block Grant 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan? COMMITTEE: Parks,Recreation,Human Services, &Public Safety MEETING DATE: 10/8/2019 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager DEPT: CD Joseph Adriano, CDBG/Human Services Coordinator Attachments: Staff Report 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan Options Considered: 1. Approve the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan 2. Do not approve the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan and give staff direction MAYOR'S RT~COMMEND ON: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: 7 �1 �t. DIRECTOR APPROVAL: $ 1Q Co 'Re (. ssur.: , ItutiallDute Intli Date WlKh L7.Lr COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:I move to forward the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan to the October 15, 2019 agenda for approval. _X`--- ,f i mmittee Chair Committee ember Coimi 'it'ee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan with the conditions recommended by the Human Services Commission and authorize the Mayor to execute all necessary documents to implement the Plans and the corresponding funding agreements with the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S 2ELICE COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: City Council Members VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manage- SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan Financial Impacts: The cost to the City for Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)program and 2020 Annual Action Plan was included within the approved budget. In accordance with the approved budget,this item is funded by a grant from U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development in the anticipated amount of$691,143.00 per year and prior year resources in the amount of$157,722.The grant will fully reimburse the costs incurred by the City to carry out the projects or to reimburse subrecipients for expenses incurred in carrying out the projects. Background Information: In program year 2015, the City, as a member of the HOME Consortium with King County, began participation in the County's Consolidated Plan, resulting in the adoption of a new Consolidated Plan for the 2015-2019 program year period. Similarly,for 2020-2024,the City will continue to participate in the King County HOME Consortium with the City's 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan submitted with the King County HOME Consortium Plan. Staff has updated the City-specific Consolidated Plan and has provided input for the housing portion of the HOME Consortium Plan, for which King county is responsible. The City's Consolidated Plan assesses needs and identifies goals and strategies for its CDBG program. The goals are mostly a continuation of the prior Consolidated Plan with one exception as addressing homelessness has been made into a separate goal for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan.The identified goals and strategies included in the Consolidated Plan are: 1. Expand Economic Opportunities a. Encourage the creation and growth of businesses; b. Increase opportunities for employment in jobs providing livable incomes;and c. Promote an environment that is attractive to both establishing new businesses and expanding existing businesses to create jobs and strengthen the economic base of the community with a plan that integrated with other City initiatives. Rev.7/18 2. Preserve Affordable Housing a. Support homeownership focusing on programs that assist homeowners to retain and maintain their homes, and offer new homeowner opportunities; and b. Preserve existing affordable rental housing. 3. Prevent and Address Homelessness a. Provide emergency assistance to prevent homelessness; and b. Develop and/or support infrastructure and services to address homelessness. 4. Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environments a. Provide an array of services to households to help them on the path toward self-sufficiency; b. Provide a safety net of services to stabilize households who are in crisis or at risk; and c. Provide public improvements or supports to build a vibrant community through facilities and activities while revitalizing deteriorating neighborhoods Included in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan is the 2020 Annual Action Plan. The Annual Action Plan is the annual work and spending plan for the City of Federal Way's CDBG funds from HUD. An Action Plan is required for each year of the Consolidated Plan program period. The PY 2020 Action Plan is for the first year of the Consolidated Plan program period and allocated $848,865, including$691,143 from the anticipated 2020 allocation and $157,722 from prior year resources. The Human Services Commission considered the Program Year 2020 Annual Action Plan at its regular meeting on September 16, 2019, and voted 9-0 to "recommend the City Council approve the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan as presented and that, in the event the 2020 annual grant amount from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is either less than or more than anticipated, staff is authorized to make appropriate pro rata adjustments to the categories of Public Services, Planning and Administration, and Community Economic Revitalization Funding (CERF) provided that amounts do not exceed the amount requested; and additionally, staff may make technical amendments to incorporate final performance measures from 2019." Rev.7/18 Centeredon Opportunity Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 1 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Executive Summary ES-05 Executive Summary— 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The City of Federal Way Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan (Consolidated Plan) guides the investment of federal housing and community development funds, and other local funds.The City's Consolidated Plan is associated with the larger King County Consortium Consolidated Plan.The Consolidated Plan is a requirement of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD), through which the City of Federal Way receives an annual entitlement, or formula grant, from the Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Program. These funds allocated to the City are used to address community development needs throughout Federal Way over the next five years,from 2020- 2024. As a participant in the King County HOME Consortium, the City of Federal Way has access to benefits of the HOME Investment Partnerships(HOME) Program. The cities of Auburn, Bellevue, and Kent also participate in the Consortium for the use of HOME Investment Partnership Program funds for affordable housing. Data in the Consolidated Plan is based primarily on the 2013-2017 American Community Survey(ACS) five-year data set.This data provides the most detailed and reliable information available on income, poverty, housing, housing cost burden, and other data. In certain cases,the most recent data and analysis is from 2011-2015 ACS. In these instances, data is compared from the same time period for consistency. ACS data has been supplemented in this Consolidated Plan with more recent data from surveys, interviews, public meetings, and other available data pertaining to housing and community development.The Consolidated Plan follows the US Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) standardized template, and each section contains questions framed by HUD. The Consolidated Plan incorporates findings and goals from the 2019 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). The 9/6/2019 Update replaces the original. It includes language relating to incurring pre-award costs on page 72 as it is anticipated the federal government will pass a continuing resolution and CDBG budget allocations will be delayed.While the City will comply with the current deadlines of submittal on or before November 15,the included language allows pre-award costs to be incurred should the 2020 allocation be delayed. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 2 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview The Consolidated Plan establishes local priorities consistent with national objectives and the US Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The identified goals are in this Consolidated Plan are: • Expand economic opportunities- increase local opportunities and create jobs. • Preserve affordable housing-ensure access to healthy, safe, affordable housing for low-and moderate-income households throughout the City and advance fair housing to address discrimination. • Prevent and address homelessness- make homelessness rare, brief, and one-time and eliminate racial disparities. • Establish and maintain suitable living environments-create a healthy, integrated, and vibrant community by improving the well-being and mobility of low-and moderate-income residents through an array of services addressing basic needs and progress toward self-sufficiency. Strategies in the Consolidated Plan will be implemented with CDBG funds provided by HUD. Based on its 2019 formula allocation,the City estimates that approximately$691,143 in grant funds will be available annually, subject to annual federal appropriations. 3. Evaluation of past performance The City has been able to meet the needs of many low-and moderate-income households through its CDBG Program. Activities implemented under that arrangement have succeeded in: 1) meeting the needs of homeowners through its housing repair programs; 2) providing much needed services to help households to regain stability; and, 3) providing facilities and improvements to increase the quality of life. During the period of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan,the City of Federal Way worked closely with the community, nonprofit agencies,the private sector,the State of Washington, HUD,the faith-based community, and the philanthropic community to make progress towards goals. From 2015 through 2018,the City of Federal Way reported in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Reports(CAPERS): • 3 persons received support for housing repair and rehabilitation • 1,309 persons received assistance with public services including 139 persons who received employment training leading to 85 job placements • 231 persons received economic development-related assistance • One domestic violence shelter received critical repairs for security • Two homes were acquired as affordable housing Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 3 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) • One home was added as an adult home for individuals with disabilities • The Performing Arts and Event Center opened in 2017 In 2019, additional persons will receive needed public services and technical assistance for their businesses and the City anticipates assisting partners in completing up to 16 additional housing repair projects, rehabilitating an 86-unit affordable housing complex, and acquiring one transitional housing unit. The City has also made progress in the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA) located in North Federal Way. Several of the projects above are in the area including homeowner rehab,the affordable housing rehabilitation, and a streetlight project.Additionally, the City collaborates with Build the Bridge, a group of organization representatives and community members that has a track record of successful place-based work. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The City engaged the community prior to and during the development of the Consolidated Plan in order to receive input on community needs, barriers to fair housing, priorities, and potential strategies. Notices were on the City's website and emailed to partners and community stakeholders. The City, in conjunction with the Consortium, consulted with multiple public and private agencies during the development of Consolidated Plan.Agencies included King County Housing Authority, All Home King County, regional jurisdictions, other government human service providers, and nonprofit agencies delivering services to City residents in the City of Federal Way and the region. The City had a public participation process, as outlined below: • Notice of Funds Available for PY2020 CDBG Community Economic Revitalization Funds was published in the Federal Way Mirror on June 7, 2019. • Request for public comments and input was emailed to stakeholders and service agencies on August 30, 2019, seeking input through October 14, 2019. A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Federal Way Mirror on August 30, 2019 notifying the community of public hearings to be held on September 16, 2019 and October 15, 2019 and to announce a 44-day comment period on the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan. • Two open houses were included in the notice; an open house was held on September 12, 2019 and a second will be held on October 1, 2019 to provide an overview and receive input on the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. • A public hearing was held on September 16, 2019, before the Human Services Commission,to receive input on the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020 Annual Action Plan. A public hearing will be held on October 15, 2019, before the Federal Way City Council, to receive input on the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and the 2015 Annual Action Plan. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 4 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 5. Summary of public comments No public comments have been received on the draft Consolidated Plan to date,though public input in the development of the Consolidated Plan is included throughout the Consolidated Plan. Public comments on the draft plan will be added as received. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them No public comments have been received on the draft Consolidated Plan to date. If a public comment is not accepted, it will be added as received. 7. Summary A summary will be added based on comments received. The remainder of this report will provide details on how the City proposes to prioritize its investment. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 5 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator FEDERAL WAY Community Services Division Table 1—Responsible Agencies Narrative The City of Federal Way, as member of the King County Consortium, administers its own CDBG funds and prepares its own Consolidated Plan for the administration of those funds. However, it also contributes to sections of the King County Consolidated Plan relating to the HOME program. As a member of the King County Consortium,the City works closely with numerous nonprofit organizations in the region to implement programs funded by the City's CDBG program. A detailed list of the agencies responsible for administering programs funded by CDBG may be found in the Annual Action Plan section of this document. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Sarah Bridgeford Community Services Manager City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way,WA 98003 253-835-2650 sarah.bridgeford@cityoffederalway.com Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 6 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1) 1. Introduction Consultation and citizen participation are important elements of the plan and its implementation. The City follows and regularly updates the Citizen Participation Plan for the City of Federal Way Consolidated Plan to guide the process, provide opportunities for citizen involvement throughout the development of the Plan, and provide input for the implementation and program evaluation phases in future years. During the process of developing the Plan, organizations (both public and private) were consulted and local groups participated in providing input on needs and proposed strategies. The City of Federal Way is an active partner and participant in local and regional community development and human services efforts. The City engages in ongoing coordination between other cities in South King County having common interests and needs for community development, as well as public policy organizations, housing providers, health providers, service agencies, and faith-based organizations that are extensively involved in providing support to low-and moderate-income persons and households, as well as people experiencing homelessness.The City also works with other members of the King County Consortium (Consortium)to conduct and participate in ongoing meetings with each other, stakeholders, public housing authorities (PHAs), including the King County Housing Authority, and for the Continuum of Care, nonprofit housing and service providers, members of the Housing Development Consortium of Seattle-King County, Public Health Department of Seattle and King County, Puget Sound Regional Council, South King County Human Services Planners, and the Washington State Department of Commerce.This coordination takes place regularly and informs recommendations for decision making bodies such as the City's Human Services Commission. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)). The City of Federal Way participates in both local and regional approaches and engages in ongoing coordination between other jurisdictions, housing and homeless services providers, health providers, and service agencies.The collaboration includes monthly human services planners meetings and participation in numerous formal and informal regional collaborations such as the Joint Recommendations Committee (JRC), South King Housing and Homelessness Partners(SKHHP),the Affordable Housing Committee (AHC), and AHC's Housing Interjurisdictional Team (HUT).The City is also a member of the King County Human Services Funder Collaborative, which provides a more streamlines process for human service agencies and increase collaboration and alignment, when appropriate, between cities.This coordination is ongoing throughout the year and, along with other community engagement and public meetings, informs the development of the Consolidated Plan and the decision- making of groups such as the Human Services Commission. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 7 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth)and persons at risk of homelessness The City of Federal Way coordinates with All Home King County(All Home),which has been designated by the King County Council as the Continuum of Care (CoQ for King County.All Home is a local organization created to work with service providers and advise local government on the creation of a local homeless housing plan and to participate in a local homeless housing program. Federal Way works with King County and other communities in the Consortium to provide input to All Home on local and sub-regional issues and needs regarding homelessness and housing and services for people experiencing homelessness. Since 2016, King County and All Home have implemented Coordinated Entry for All (CEA)for persons experiencing homelessness and has been refining the system since then. National research indentifies coordinated entry as a key component for an effective homeless system as it improces the quality of client screening and assessment, matches clients to appropriately targeted services and resources, and promotes a more efficient use of resources. CEA utilizes a common assessment tool based on vulnerability and severity of service needs to ensure people who need the service the most receive it in a timely manner. In addition, CEA has established regional access points serving as the primary"front door" for the homeless housing system; one of the regional access points is in Federal Way with the Multi-Service Center as the provider. The City also works with collaborative efforts such as the South King County Homelessness Action Team. These collaborations look at addressing regional needs in sustainable ways and by carrying out evidence based-and/or best practice models. In 2018,the City of Federal Way established a Homelessness Task Force to evaluate and make recommendations to address homelessness in Federal Way. City Council has also set homelessness as one of its top priorities and is engaging in conversations on how to move forward with the task force recommendations.The City also provided grant funds in 2019 to FUSION, a local nonprofit serving homeless families, as they move forward in acquiring property to establish a permanent family shelter located in Federal Way. The City provides both CDBG and local funds to agencies that serve chronically homeless individuals and families,families with children,veterans, and unaccompanied youth. In addition, Federal Way is fortunate to have numerous faith-based organizations that provide regular services and support to people experiencing homelessness in our community. This includes meals, overnight shelter during the cold months, and shower and laundry services.The City also uses general fund dollars to fund the Reach Out winter shelters for homeless men and women as well as a year-round day shelter. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 8 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) The City participates in and co-leads a local deployment site for the annual Count Us In, Point in Time Count. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS McKinney-Vento funding for the Emergency Solutions Grant(ESG) is administered by King County and allocated through a competitive process.The City of Federal Way regularly collaborates with King County and All Home and maintains a close working relationship with other communities,especially those in South King County,to provide input.This input includes discussions on performance standards and the implementation of the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), King County also administers. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 9 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities Table 2—Agencies,groups,organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization City of Auburn Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government- Local What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Lead-based Paint Strategy Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless Non-Homeless Special Needs Anti-poverty Strategy How was the Staff consults with City of Auburn staff regularly Agency/Group/Organization consulted through ongoing collaborative efforts in addition to and what are the anticipated outcomes discussions and coordination specific to the 2020- of the consultation or areas for improved 2024 Consolidated Plan. coordination? 2 Agency/Group/Organization Catholic Community Services of Western Washington Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Services- Housing Services-Children Services-Elderly Persons Services-Persons with Disabilities Services-homeless Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless Homeless Needs- Families with children Homelessness Needs-Veterans Non-Homeless Special Needs Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 10 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) How was the Agency was consulted in a one-on-one interview Agency/Group/Organization consulted regarding local and regional needs and strategies. and what are the anticipated outcomes Agency is consulted throughout the year for general of the consultation or areas for improved collaboration and emerging issues as well as regular coordination? updates on programs and service delivery improvement. Agency was as also contacted via email to respond to the draft Consolidated Plan. 3 Agency/Group/Organization CHI Franciscan Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Health Health Agency ' Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs Economic Development Market Analysis Anti-poverty Strategy How was the Agency leads a place-based collaboration,which Agency/Group/Organization consulted includes focus on the approved Neighborhood and what are the anticipated outcomes Revitalization Strategy Area and implementing the of the consultation or areas for improved corresponding strategies in that area.Agency coordination? representatives are in close communication regarding the Consolidated Plan and the included strategies. 4 Agency/Group/Organization FUSION Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-homeless What section of the Plan was addressed Homelessness Strategy by Consultation? Homeless Needs- Families with children How was the Agency was in close contact regarding homeless Agency/Group/Organization consulted strategies specific to families experiencing and what are the anticipated outcomes homelessness. of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 5 Agency/Group/Organization HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Education Services-Employment Regional organization Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 11 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) What section of the Plan was addressed Economic Development by Consultation? Market Analysis Anti-poverty Strategy How was the Agency participated in a one-on-one meeting and Agency/Group/Organization consulted provides regular input on regional and local needs and what are the anticipated outcomes and strategies. of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 6 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Development Consortium Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional organization Planning organization What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy Market Analysis How was the Agency was contacted via regular collaborative Agency/Group/Organization consulted efforts and regarding specific housing and and what are the anticipated outcomes homelessness slra flies. of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 7 Agency/Group/Organization KING COUNTY Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government-County What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless Homeless Needs- Families with children Homelessness Needs-Veterans Homelessness Needs- Unaccompanied youth Market Analysis Anti-poverty Strategy How was the Participated in developing local strategies to align Agency/Group/Organization consulted and coordinate with county-wide strategies. and what are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 12 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 8 Agency/Group/Organization KING COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Public Housing Needs How was the Agency was contacted for input regarding housing Agency/Group/Organization consulted needs in the City and region as well as the and what are the anticipated outcomes Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area in North of the consultation or areas for improved Federal Way. coordination? 9 Agency/Group/Organization MULTI-SERVICE CENTER Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Services- Housing Services-Children Services-Elderly Persons Services-homeless Services-Education Services-Employment Service-Fair Housing Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy Homeless Needs-Chronically homeless Homeless Needs- Families with children Homelessness Needs-Veterans Non-Homeless Special Needs Anti-poverty Strategy How was the Agency was consulted in a one-on-one interview Agency/Group/Organization consulted regarding local and regional needs and strategies. and what are the anticipated outcomes Agency is consulted throughout the year for general of the consultation or areas for improved collaboration and emerging issues as well as regular coordination? updates on programs and service delivery improvement. Agency was also contacted via email to respond to the draft Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 13 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 10 Agency/Group/Organization Public Health of Seattle-King County Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Persons with HIV/AIDS Services-homeless Services-Health Health Agency Other government-County What section of the Plan was addressed Homelessness Strategy by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency was consulted in a one-on-one interview Agency/Group/Organization consulted regarding local and regional needs and strategies. and what are the anticipated outcomes Agency is consulted throughout the year for general of the consultation or areas for improved collaboration and emerging issues as well as regular coordination? updates on programs and service delivery improvement.Agency was also contacted via email to respond to the draft Consolidated Plan. 11 Agency/Group/Organization South King County Housing and Homelessness Partners Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Regional organization Planning organization What section of the Plan was addressed Housing Need Assessment by Consultation? Homelessness Strategy How was the Agency was consulted via regular collaborative Agency/Group/Organization consulted processes.The City is a member of South King and what are the anticipated outcomes Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP) and is of the consultation or areas for improved in close contact regarding regional planning efforts coordination? pertaining to affordable housing and homelessness. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting No types of agencies were excluded from consultation.The City invited all agency types to provide preliminary input on strategies for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan via email and in meetings.This included the solicitation of input via an email to 56 agencies of different type, one community meeting, four monthly Human Services Commission meetings with the Consolidated Plan as a discussion item, and many one-on-one conversations and meetings.The consultation process will continue throughout the public comment period. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 14 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care All Home,the This plan informs priorities and strategies relating to Continuum of Care the City's Consolidated Plan goal to address homelessness. Regional Affordable King County, The five-year plan includes goal areas and strategies RL Task Force- Affordable Housing that coincide with the City's Consolidated Plan goal Committee to provide decent, affordable housing. Table 3—Other local/regional/federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(1)) A wide range of groups and organizations participated in the process including public funders from State of Washington, King County, and other local jurisdictions. Additionally,the jurisdictions participating in the HOME Consortium coordinate closely with each other and participate in a wide range of standing and one-time meetings with city planners, housing, and service providers for the purpose of aligning efforts when possible and reasonable to do so. The City of Federal Way works with the State of Washington and King County in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan through participation on committees, review panels, boards, and planning groups. The City coordinates funding opportunities where possible with other jurisdictions and works with state and county funders to assist non-profit organizations in developing funding packages to provide housing for people experiencing homelessness and those at-risk of becoming homeless. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 15 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) L m i C a) L .� Cla c f° c m `^ ° a) -0 0 0 0 °D N d1 .0o U GD . 0 m o �••' � N VI a1 U L � -0 v u o v kD VI +J Q OD N L L o C a1 L a"' O O m +� O U N U Vf O 0_ to c c a � v s U W LF- -0 m C 3 GD -0 u O a) t OL O C "a a Q 4., a- 3 Q- O > L v c m U > c N G a u 3 o s GOD a) •? L a v >- > } O E u c a o +' a +� 3 +, � a m �c MO M Q- -0 O N 3 c n v, 3 a� •� - E -0 > t t ° 4-1 c E cu o o m +, M 0 O E U 3 �- c CL �= 3 +_ 0in U tjo c C >^ C d m to m 3 3 N L to o a-+ Na1 w 3 U E m pOD a) u m OoD C 04 N v m t v U U O G7 C O 0 +� C L0 L t O d t O O 0 0 +� O 2- 0O GD E U iL Lm O w L L J O �O N to N a) CL L bD m N Q V) 'C7 GOD ,+>J c �' w LULU V a1 m U C o tw >• CL C v s o r 3 o U N � r+ to 3 01 O O o m Ln o •E O E Ln ui3 3 0 L 0 .s 0 U c V) O N U Q- U GD E cu +J t m T-4 d 0 O N C7 GD (vCo a � •N V4V GDN 0 p + O O U m CL f0 N N vlX + m LO N > 3 U N C •+>+ L 0 m i -0 C -0 C GJ C U CIA t O C E ++ V O N a1 3 GD U -0 m 'L O L > en o 01 O- L j E +> +�+ t O +' O m LD O .� a Q o O L +•' t L L 3 w N m C c E v a ,� oD ° CL E _� a p M v > E an S c -0 0 aEi °° ++ co -a E m .� L c N o 0 fC r- CL v -a O O a) 2' O O m ,,, O m o a) O •3 C N C O O tV Q f6 C o +�+ L GD aJ O a L ate. 'c +� O -a O GD C +J E O a� C Z- vl O Q U 4-1 O vl N N 00 0 L N L Q >` U L N O M +� O O to E m O L E v_I a1 > c E V of U OL w m ? a1 L LL +' C O Q. 4- 4.1 m 4- CID a,.� � >+ O 3 N 4- 3 +L+ -a c 3 }>_i v 3 m L += z O V N f0 0 0tio L3 m "a U A Q L w 3 E U 3 _0 vl °D c U > o E `o E w OL U w OL GD I a1 a1 a) � E m d .4 1A H � •E a Q- w 0 F- vOi 4- m o O 2 t � 2 § CL CL � o § E $ r- o w E 0 u c § § 2 2 2 2 k 0 / ® k 0 / - 0 3 V) a '� k � k « f / \ \ lao§ y / c § / \ \ / \ \ % 2 u / u g c u / u y u G u 4- \ \ � f 2 / \ 3 E \ cw M - \ ^ e 0 M 3 \ ^ a ^ / k / / ® % [ > _/ ƒ / / / \ m E E a o — 2 E > -0 E E E W / 5 = y S 0 \ f § u ± \ u QJ t a m m m ° A � E k / g u ° E 3 m / g u / E bo c = u 0 u m r 3 & E s © § LA o E W c g �3 - \ & w u E 2 2 3 4- / w # 3 / / uR e u = ° % u k ¢ a : 0CIJ / k § cli §\ / f � � § \ / M LU EmLL V / / k / § \ / -0E E@ @ m @ m CA E 'E « 2 § § / E E q § $ aj q § E E ECL) 0 0. E E E cliE § ~ E E § ~ E E o E ) ® ƒ \ E S � q ƒ / � q ƒ / / S CL q % % § >§ � § > tw 4 - O m E $ E ƒ E E w E � 6 E E 6@ E % k 3 S �2 3 u k 3 S _ u . r . $ m -0 \ O 7 / / ? r V) ( § k i / / / m I a % 2 I © u u u / 3 Ln az k o 2 u (A o _ C4 m § O 0 2 t � � 2 ^ q0. a � . 0 0 m E 2 CL q E 2 \ 2 ® / ƒ _ L § m w : x c 2 V k ƒ § k k ' / $ k E ) . ° ' 5 = $ I f M § K 2 -o 2 m u c 0 2 g % 'u m Vi = u g E e c % 2 7 / 0 § / r / r 3 0 § k � / / \ 0 E g ' & § \ E 7 ' e ƒ E � -M'-' \ g / § \ \ q ' a k \ m & � k k ) k / co \ 2 / bo 0 k ƒ ± / # $ s E § F � � \ / - Z -0> = .- \ q / k § k / k / E / / � _ / f / / a 2 / 2 = # f \ 2 § § S f \ \ \ f E 2 ' u / / bD k f k / m 2 E o / 7 . > o f § / o § § Ln e _ W ) " � ƒ / W / w e m c • e ms 3 > aj § o 2 2 g E u o = m / \ 3 2 \ § a 2 q \ \ ) / / 3 & E 2 m m � / » o � u R m Q 0 2 f LU / LU / 7 E @ ¥ f 2 § ƒ § / CL @ > w r- § =3 � . % CL tw 2 E § _ / = oto �ie > � 41 7a dO o L.� 2 m % E 6 7 ƒ \ ® C) @ E m ,k � # � ƒ 2 « E CL) ( \ cu \ G » 0 2 \ / aj > 9 k > \ k $ \ z O \ 0 a, CL ro 0 'o -a v O - EE a c c c C c u c 0 O o o o cn m z z z z L -0 O 0 � } OtOa vi O 4' C O 0 � Q o 4- bo aj c c S: _ w o > O a eA o -0 a, �' M U O m Q Q) :3 E Q p •� a N a aj v E ni + o o 'O v u A O C o O C ou o O v) U O u o N H N O M N Q 'a N O c E o E o O oN 3 0 0 c � N Ln ami ° o 0 oN v No No = c on v O L N N o 'O O vi E a cu m Q rn ° o oN a 3 Q v CL •� N o VI �, o $ 00 CL Q u C o L o Cj r4 N cu �n r-I E N N r-I Q -co n v fO (O V 3 L 3 U O G G E O O 7 L O co O O N U N N t > t d ........... — } ai b < u cu +' On L C a) N a) a) _ O a) cu a- vi to J � "O �'' 3 7 dD N N 0 C f0 CU U +1 aJ 0 � 0 O al a) aJ aj N 'f O C E f6 O C •� O E L +' W f6 0 f0 L O cu O O cC a1 +, co L LL vi o f oN o 3 v aj `° v 'E v � i o oai a m � L° o X u Q _ L _ i Q N 2 U Q r-I Ln Ou z '> N ?i +f 6+ Q- vii N c+o .O c� �1 O L O w O O O >" O > L abo +, c c v= c a c 7 a 7 a) O O aj O a) w O O ai E v E C a E " a E c IOD E c tin E ao E L UO E co Z 4- Ov Z � Ov Z z � Ov N Z 4M Ov oo d — y o ++ � u t o fa U U _ L On Ony On •O o }1 C C L L c_ N N Q) O O N U O i2: CU ai c c U O C a) aJ - Z L O` o O u O Ln W n 00 rn co -- _ 0 2 t � � 2 ^ q � a . � o o � k ° g / ¢ M , \ m m = c m E E u e o g g E o m - � � � . i / M E m / m E m / t E m k = 2 5 m a a k % 0. % 2 � 2 / $ m E E 3 u E u / � / M 2 2 E 4 3 § E k = / \ G @ '� ° / § E f o / / m m LA E E u e w 6 _0 _0 0 � 3 $ / e f f o E o c t 2 2 / 6 k § § 2 2 k \ \ B § m CL \ C / / 2 � . 41 0 k \ aj a m q C $ § § ai m % q c m q 2 m § - \ ~ \ 2 � f 2 ± S 2 \ - a 2 2 e 2 Q § m \ ƒ 2 w -0 u a) ƒ 2 � E E § CL � ° 2 = ° 2 f \ CL $ E / d \ / d / 0 § § § > > > W t G § G b 6 b 2 3 u 2 3 , 2 3 — . Mrq � � \ m A k / % ) / / ■ u u u 9 0 _ . . § / z ou Ln L\ q q § — 0 Needs Assessment NA-05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview In assessing the needs of the City of Federal Way, information was obtained from the American Community Survey(ACS), other data sources, governmental agencies, public and private non-profit organizations, and other sector representatives. The City is home to 94,905 residents(2013-17 ACS). It has grown around transportation and residential or retail development supported the needs of residents who commuted to neighboring industrial and urban areas for employment. Similar to other communities around the 1-5 corridor,the high mobility is a benefit and a challenge. The City has a very diverse population.About half(52%) of the population is Hispanic and/or a race other than white alone. Of 89,000 people over age 5, 34%speak a language other than English in the home and the school district rcports 120 languages spoken by students. While diversity is an asset, inability to speak English can be a barrier, especially to those who might be isolated by need, age, disability, or other circumstance. Additionally, growing diversity highlights the need for services to be culturally responsive with values of equity and inclusion. The City's median household income (2013-2017 ACS) was$62,086—just 74%of the median of King County($83,571) as a whole.Twenty-five percent of households had incomes less than $35,000 annually. Most workers commute out of the City. While housing costs are lower in Federal Way than many areas in the region,studies show the cost of commuting can offset lower housing costs.The Center for Neighborhood Technology calculates that Federal Way households spend an average of 44% of income on housing and commuting. In-depth economic development analysis is provided in section MA-45. The 2019 Point in Time count found 11,199 people experiencing homelessness in King County, of whom 124 were unsheltered in Federal Way.This underestimates the number of persons experiencing homelessness because the count does not calculate the number of unique individuals and families experiencing homeless throughout the year. Services from emergency shelters through permanent supportive housing as well as services to intervene and prevent homelessness are inadequate. Systems of cooperating agencies and volunteers are unable to meet the overwhelming number of calls for assistance. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 21 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) For instance, during the first half of 2018, Mary's Place—which operates the call-in line for families experiencing homelessness—received 54 calls for emergency shelter from Federal Way families. Of these, only 19 were able to get shelter.The remaining 65%could not access shelter, exposing them to the dangers that come with homelessness. People experiencing homelessness have shorter lifespans when compared with the general population, and are at greater risk of chronic health problems, injury, and death. For 2018,the King County Medical Examiner reported that the South King County region (which includes Federal Way) saw 21%of deaths of people experiencing homelessness countywide.This was second only to Seattle, which saw 63%of such deaths. Of the 40 deaths in South King County, at least 10 deaths were of people experiencing homelessness in Federal Way. People in Federal Way also have special needs including visual, auditory, ambulatory, and cognitive disabilities as well as difficulty with self-care and independent living tasks. Of the nearly 11,000 Federal Way residents over age 16 who have a disability, about 30%were below 150%of the federal poverty level, in contrast to about 18%of those without a disability. Over 70%are not in the labor force. Over 40%of those with a disability who did work earned less than $25,000 annually(ACS 2013-17). Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 22 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs - 91.415, 91.215 (f) Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Facilities: There are facilities owned and/or operated by public and nonprofit organizations that are located within the City of Federal Way, as well as numerous agencies with offices elsewhere in South King County that support City residents.These include, but are not limited to,the following: a Multi-Service Center • Catholic Community Services • Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) • Valley Cities Counseling&Consultation • HealthPoint • Seattle-King County Public Health • Franciscan Hospital • King County Library System • City of Federal Way Community Center The City has and continues to study needs for infrastructure to address homelessness.The City is home to Reach Out, a shelter that operates from October through March and services singles adult men and women. A day center opened in 2016 for adults with limited hours for families.A family shelter is in development with support via a pass through grant from the City, and large capital investments from the State and King County. However,the City and the surrounding region in South King County lacks necessary infrastructure to address increasing homelessness, which has been identified as both a top concern and priority by City Council and residents.The Mayor's Task Force on Homelessness concluded in winter of 2018 and City Council is reviewing recommendations to create a strategic plan of action. Additionally,the City participates in ongoing regional conversations and efforts to expand infrastructure to address homelessness in South King County potentially including one or more enhanced, 24 Hour- Emergency Shelters or other models. Siting of such a shelter or shelters will include many factors as not one city is likely going to be able to sustain such a service alone.Accessibility will become a key factor. Medical respite is another need that existing human service organizations are not able to address. People often exit emergency rooms and hospitals with nowhere to go and end up in emergency shelters or on the street. Public Health of Seattle-King County's Mobile Medical Team continues to see increasingly worsening medical conditions that would be preventable with medical respite care. The City has a relatively young population, with about 34%of its residents under the age of 25 compared to 29%countywide (American Community Survey, 2013-17).Additionally, unemployment is higher for Federal Way residents age 16-24 than the County as a whole and educational attainment is lower for both high school and bachelors degrees. Combined with retail representing the second highest business sector in Federal Way,these statistics indicate a need for creating additional education and Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 23 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) employment training and opportunities for youth and young adults.This could include a center such as the Tacoma Reach Center or similar model. The City has also experienced changing racial and ethnic composition.As diversity increases,the development of facilities should be approached with this in mind to create places that are culturally relevant, equitable, and inclusive. The City may use CDBG capital funds for public facility improvements and infrastructure updates.This will be determined on a case-by-case basis, readiness of projects, and afunding availability. How were these needs determined? The determination of needs is an ongoing process based upon monitoring, reporting, and consultation with agencies supported by the City, as well as community conversations and input that takes place at public meetings,the Human Services Commission, and City Council. A variety of data sources were also considered as part of determing the needs. Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Improvements: The City does not anticipate using CDBG funds for public improvements; public improvement needs are supported by other City funds. How were these needs determined? Public improvement needs within the City are determined by elected and appointed officials, city staff, community input, and life cycle. Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Services: The City has experienced population growth of about 8.6%since 2010 and changes in demographics from race, ethnicity, income, educaiton, languages, and other categories.The increase in the number of residents living in poverty or with low-and moderate-incomes has increased the demand for services while nonprofits continue to report limited resources and capacity to meet the need.The 2017 Self Sufficiency Standard for South King County for a one adult and two child home is$68,625 annually and for a two adult and two child home, it is$74,083 annually.The City's median income is$62,086,falling short of both standards. Coupled with increasing rents and local economic growth that has not kept pace with the region specifically income growth, such growth increases the inequities locally presenting further challenges to residents that have low-to moderate-income. Additionally,the City participated with the Consortium in having fair housing testing completed.The testing found that individual-level discrimination was present and ongoing in King County,the City being no exception.About half of field-testing found evidence of this discrimination and as did 60%of the Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 24 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) tests in the City.The sample size was small and restricted primarily by budget, but also due to the time it takes to conduct such testing.As the City becomes more diverse,this discrimination and disproportionate housing needs and access to opportunity in South King County present a growing challenge. As mentioned above in relation to public facilities,the larger youth and young adult population and statistics on employment and education rates for this population indicate a need for continued investment in public services for youth and young adults.This need has also been affirmed by residents, stakeholders, and the City. One of the most pressing needs for public services continues to be services to address homelessness. The need includes prevention, shelter, housing, and services to increase stability.Youth services are also identified as a high need within the City.The City anticipates using the full 15%of its CDBG allocation to support public services programs over the five-year Consolidated Plan period. How were these needs determined? The public services needs were determined using demographic information, needs assessments, unemployment rates, social service agency information, and public input. Additionally, City staff participate in regular meetings and events where human services needs and potential solutions are the primary focus of discussion. The determination to use the full federally allowed amount of CDBG funds for public services projects was determined in consultation with nonprofit organizations, stakeholders, and community leaders, as well as historical demand, which always outstrips the funding available. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 25 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Housing Market Analysis MA-05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview: The Market Analysis Section covers areas of non-housing community development within the City of Federal Way. King County's Consolidated Plan has a substantial housing market analysis including the City. However,the City is including a brief housing market analysis in this overview as it pertains to many of the strategies for achieving affordable housing and suitable living environments. The American Community Survey(ACS, 2013-17) estimated that the national vacancy rate is 1.7 for homeowner units and 6.1 for rental vacancies. In Federal Way,those figures are 2.0 and 3.8, respectively. Of 36,435 housing units, 57%are single family, 39%multifamily, and 4% mobile homes. According to the ACS, about 54%of households renting a unit in Federal Way paid 30%or more of income toward rent.Average rent in the city is about$1,400 per month as of April 2019.This is a 4% increase from April 2018 and a 34%increase since April 2014. In order to afford rent and living expenses in South King County in 2017,two adults and two children would need an annual household income of nearly$82,000, according to the University of Washington. However,the median household income in Federal Way was just over$62,000. Average rent has been trending upward for the past five years. If this trend continues, average rent could increase by 16%to over$1,600 in 2024.Additionally,the median value of owner-occupied units was$280,700(2017), a 17%increase over the median of $242,800 in 2014. Should that trend continue, median values could reach around $350,000 in 2024. Almost all of the housing was constructed after 1959 (93%). Even so, about 46%of homes were built in 1979 or earlier.As about 75%of housing built before 1978 is subject to lead-based paint hazard disclosure, an estimated 13,000 units in Federal Way may have lead-based paint. Most of the housing stock is in average (52%) or good (29%) condition according to the King County Assessor's residential building quality data, in the three zip codes that overlap with Federal Way. 11% range from poor to the lowest grade currently meeting code. Rising housing costs and low vacancy rates make finding affordable housing an ongoing challenge, highlighting the need to preserve affordable housing, maintain the quality of public-and privately- owned affordable housing, and look at developing new affordable housing, particularly units affordable to extremely low-income households. Per adopted growth targets, 12%of the housing supply should be affordable to households at or below 30%of the area median income.As of April 30, 2019, only about 2%of units were affordable for this population. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 26 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Public policies, such as tax structures, can create barriers for a city to foster affordable housing.The state does not have an income tax, which burdens lower income households. Meanwhile, cities have limited budgets as, without the benefit of a statewide income tax,they must turn to property and sales taxes to fund competing needs.The state has a cap on annual property tax increases. As the City of Federal Way has a low property tax rate,the City has no ability to catch up to neighboring cities and has lower revenue as a result.This leaves little power for the City to heavily impact the development or preservation of affordable housing. Recent state legislation allows cities to recapture small portions of sales taxes and use them toward affordable housing. For Federal Way,that would amount to hundreds of thousands in a given year while affordable housing developments cost millions to build.Through collaborations, such as South King Housing and Homelessness Partnership, cities may pool resources regionally to create a steady stream of affordable housing development. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 27 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) L- f \ » / \ C: 0 : \ § { L / to / s 2 E G / c o a) / t 2 ® e & = u \ f ± / t ' / _ g e e a y 0 = a @ b aj o > c 3 \ 7 g = / . u / $ 7 \ # 2 1 / k \ / m » u u p :3 2 % ._ . e y � f f / 4 § / \ � m E o y E \ o u E 2 2 u a) % 2 o k k / 0 & 2 ƒ 0 > f f � 2 k \ 2 \ \ \ fLn f ( o ¥ o e ° k ƒ E y o -0 > 2 4-1 _ a e = / § " j S 0 R _ � 2 £ e f ' f $ 1 S E o ƒ o o LU 4-0 § u c 0 k / / / _ ) C E e @ « ro k � ' m & LL . @ 4 • E o m / CL g c = \ m « ± u \ E ® o y ± £ J U f \ o E f \ \ CL & ) _ ƒ > e E u o -c 2 2 t / / / 0 Qj o CL / 3: / - o m( LA fLA / / ƒ \ f / 0 / E e § ._ o = K f / % / 7 / / 0 7 d / U $ \ o/ \ R m c / - c k % § t / 5 o * -0o _ » Z j / � a) u \ M G ' t E 2c \ R / e k O 0 Ln Z o / / 3 k k R § % F f a . 0Ln u c / $ 3 / / u LL \ \ 0 % / / 2 ( 0 Z� 00 M 71 O ri N N Ln 00 O ; O Ln ri o0 00 N N M O -::J' Y ' N r-I o0 N Ln o Ol Ln N u3 a° 1:t N N O O Ln M 00 00 O r-I M M LD 1-� r-1 -zt ; N ri N ri ri o N w 10 a L h N c-I ri 1� O Ln ri ri r-I N a) -zt r-I N e•i r-I ri Y O 3 * 0 0 SU `m L N O O N Ln Ln Ln lD r-I m fn 1* M DO Ln r-1 N ri 1� r� mow LD to M 1� m Ln p r-I M O O r-I r-1 N 00 LD Il- m M N m w i —Z 00 N M r-I CZ ri 00 M O N a w � .O E 3 � u Z +}+ uo m M M M O M Ln 1*l m N N —i m..i lD V +� 0 N 1� N N N M r� 00 It ri N Q '^ LL } M O M O r-I tD Ol O 1*- Q) N 00 00 r-I O j Y Ln M Ol N N -te ri Ln M r-I LnC J a E o 3 v J Q 33 m ^ LO Or Z o W Ln O O a m W 41 '^ LO LL m H c io I a x W L J N N O U N Q i I„ N a O y Ln LLL N Q y p }, v +O+ N O N lD C � m C o A f6 H X U f0 C Y J lD Ln > LU 'a V) O C u v CL Y O i LU OD Ln -0 00 L w E O _ f0 m N m C N 41 QJ p 5 cLn O v 3 — O OD oD 4- L cn m -" U (C L E U L L C Q U (� >� °c F- O Q 1O «O O o y ra c > v p +L O N N 01 c a + } O E W d + +J +, O v CL _� O N V 0J m Z v r "a �' CC OC u n +T+ O c OD LA N O 7 v m O >' C C C O •� C 7 O N .O O L O v) E 4' N N (v LG Q +0.1 u O ++ u O O "a L m a O u L s? w O O O o c L +, ai fD Ln "' Q H n v r 5 0 a° c Q z W U to _ c C IA O C L 7 ` _O •U Ln — m Q O LL — t0 E C C Ln O = i 41 C 7 O t O 3 ++ to L +, m riE Ln m C +� c C a o C oA i O 'a C c �+ L N i O �' .� m O V •N Q.._a.__..0 Lu i.i U W m 0 00 O Rt 9 (-DD 9 D 00 ... O ^ M c 90 O �* m M Ln Ln M rl O Ol M Ln 1 N M c-I Gl OA O M C d V d a a� M 0 a, CL 0 d Ln Ln O O -0 N M N CO E O 9D Ln H 7 a--I Lr Ln n` Z N r-I e} 0 v Nn � a E J 3 ~ < U Z W O v in W m LL G1 f0 H C O O U- m L _ U M +�+ •V f6 f0 C c U � f6 m O a C i -� -4 N C 41 r.4 9�j C C U U f0 0 Q L O Q Q O o L Ln N O fp o o O O cliN N N 4J u 0 N N O a 0 4J 0 LA i Q o 4- o U v N N 4- N N N r '� v v m I ,,, C o v y c 4 4 o Ln 0 O �-+ N O N 0 U ++ L 7 O Q� C Ql G \ O O f6 L Q O O ,10, 4l fp O a+ a0+ O 0 Ll Ln to U M C c� H V 0M lOD D U Ln Ln o O O o O Ln Ln Ln o Il- Ln m LD 00 m 00 m M LD m r-I LO I, n 00 00 O O O r-I M M r-I i N N N r-I vL. O + LL Ln i l0 O f6 J C O O O Ln O rI +-jm Z m N N LO Ln O O O O 00 r-I Ln Ol M I, M N O Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln LM O r�-I r, � O LLD M N ri N O t Q. � Q r Ln w c0 M C EA C a) a! (U tka O O O Ln Ln O O Q aN m RT r\ M In I LLO y Ln 00 M r� LD M ILD L Q > M M ri ri al ml 0. �++ M L m o� r-1 LSO w O n LD -;I- -M Ln �p } 0 C d M C N Q a! E J c o O In o Ln Ln O o o Q E +Y' N 00) TT O LO LWD m N w LU Q L ri M m 7 pw C m C W LL p +' 2 u 010 fl- W O m O_ ~ _ 01 11) � 4 m c0 H 4 Ln N ra E > C >- :3 cu C cu aC E dA ro v a 00 C 4- a) a) OA c0 L L -� LU mco E O a�1 a1 O a a cu u > o p -a u m o Q Q w Q 'a m _ L C a)fD OO 'n � (d OAU L O 'a C7 a) CO o .O O C aj CL ttpUN L QLML ' L O v O Vo O N rbn 00 OA " L aJ bA M O ++ L 00 a) a 4+ C Op OD 6a1 LD Q W s O N -O Q O ci N -O LO O {n a H N Ln C C L6t O 0 V C ro rNI S O a, 0 4- V Z U U U U f0 f0 O N L H O 0 � t C •0 t O ; m LO to OO E U ,m, Ln t OA C v) U 0 (Af0 �o c 7 7 J S to m O J 0) 2 Ln Q [D U' G u a a m W w w 2 0 M m o m m / / \ $ \ Ln k r� k k r'4 m m m ID 2 § ro q g i u a � e ■ I m o c � . � %LU Aj s � I � k � q � m -:5 k S \CA E . ■ k 2 ° / \ § E ƒ 2-1 § ■ C'4 # ro � 2 2cu / k \ ƒ J > \ / \ E E 2 2 i 0 � U f c v g \ E / � 2 7 ■ \ ) u w .s B 0 2 � k E E w 2 § 2 E i U » / : / ai © E e � Ln 2 / * § G ' 1 � m % ,k ƒ \ » E \ \ / » \ g � I § E a LA 0 § Ln f / / \ ( ( 2 o k � 3 e & k IA � / ° 0 _� ° ° © m ° 0 m k E © t -0 ■ \ W / / / Ln / / - § 2 2 / 0 ) 2 2 3 § 0 3 ƒ \ M- � R / :341 0 \ z \ / § m \ - , . . . . . . \ 3 m/ § 0 T V) u i M — C - a aci ° o Qi v) °' Y � 3 Qo co cC,j = " o Eai o UO r-i o "E vi 0 vQ LL 4- O O > a O > 4- M = Ot v +•C > aCO . 'L ° O O OpE � 0 O 00 a -a > v_a i+ O E M° M u - c a E fl- 4-1Ln v +' 3 Ln :3a .tio +, on =3E 3 c O -a U O a "a LA in 1 � c W O Ln vi T 3 a s H a +1 +, 4.1 LL LnLn a > a N O O Q C a 4.1 a O a +, O � M +� C Ln a p Q U O N — 3 •L g 4— c -a ° 3 .c oU m ra a C ro O _ v, O M 'a 7 N N Ln rl �n L N 0 +, a +, + p L ,� E C "a u o +' u - v � Y son C x ami 3 " a 3 x o E CL a L _ E L a a p L O C w L co _0 E o ~ E -0 L +� o o ° 3 v o x O o p M L E a c s E � Q a LL N _� Q_ L E a o E ocn 1 1 ° 3 > a Ln 4— � — co m on Ln v �; +, o O O c p H Q a co o L E v`ni (U :3 ° > +J L U 4- C a a O -0 tYif 'La p '� O O 'O a O O -0 -0 � r-I E a 'n M s a w v E +, T M . o U y. a }' N M N of U L O � a (O N on C CL M N +, a M a M On a U p > +' C — E a p O 0 of Ln C a Ln +, L a O +� a L +, +, E o +, U �_• afDi tUo U L a U L1 -c 3 +J c U rLo O E O Q L a 2) _0 on M 4. C p " L �+ a a 7 .3 v ai � a L E -a ro O M Q a as N u 41 CL M CL E o cu = Y 3 c 0 M L a — E o t U L- o E c ami on o � N L a 1 3 i D E 3 a c Q v t `^ o p o c a a oo Q `n `� E o aai a C CL .7- E vcu 4-1 + 'E oT a) aa' Y E 3 E v M U Y C L C 'yr L W 3 -o c •� cu M c o0 `° O E 0 3 u o c LL -a p W M p 3 .� `^ Ln 3 a O > c � .r Ln +� a on a }' p -0 a a Q N E a a r- 0 > L < p C 4. a U a } N N M a C p #A +J a m E a a s `� -0 a � a C 4y3Lco7 >aLa L afL6 YLL sC 3m +� •Q M aj C3c3CU o o E t1a 4- U E LL on a Q o = E a _ t O *n t o o O sO+J E y uCL cu a n O O 4.1 'O N> �+ v O � o c EO u C omovOoo 6 a +, o s +, on � d4 4-1 UT U E N o � a 4H wE . OoaL " O NN Q E _p U M M o O O E CL O o 0 aQVCU�) C � c c c > E Y — E o - 3 4- CA 0 3 += +' N o a n 3 E v o° ' x 0 a>. O Q N E Q V) .L 7 a N U E T +� L 4 U _ \ u o o a s c*o E c°Ao ro a E f 6 a E vi L vii ° 0 0 L 3 Q in a a a co c �, s ° a ro E a c CL ca. a pa) LL u a s v; U CU c x ,C Qj u O O �O i � * 0 a Ln a a °CD u , `- 'N O CL O m O n a U o -1 L E L75 a' on 4- m o oD +' a s U '� 3 5 N -a L c oN � aai o u >Ln 0, `L° Ln ° Q- c E o M E O 'w -0n -0 0 > N CL f6 O T M of p p L a C N }+ f0 (O a Q f0 N a U U O > � 7 a a a O E a = �n C " as 'n `n z U "a on O a = vi C +' U p 4- > a t u �O E E - o a c co co 3 = ~ a p � E c Q api _a > +' M U p j c •V � (6 L L N M p •_ (O a O- — O Vf L 'n -a T a ri C +-+ O- C of � :c a C a u U a s a s O ' I, in p > in U m D a 0 LL LL -0 O N E � r--i � � a LJ H m C7 M pU � 'a O 0 L N O a to 4- aE t L O t L I— a +� -a pp N O a > O Jp io L a LL L Q" j a C Q. p N ~ L O a U CCL Q N w +a N a+ a C 7 L C O U N �_ O N > > O 0 a 7 QJ �C ro 'L O 3 v a ?� N a) cC C:4.0 p > \ c ° ro a L U N m } -a c L CL E v v°i — a u C �' a co O. y 3 N N ami v o a N ° o > ami = O a o a 3 v u ai +� a bz Y v = Q E O aco O "OCU� m C C a j- LLA W E a L ++ + O ba H °O Qpo aa c�a L L OD C O N � L ^ L C >' t L > C L E -O a L i v O N a O 0 — a O N O +J Q a }, OLM +' �o 4- > L O Q N O N OL C U O a C O +- to U f0 O t `- A Q 30 t- a U a N O N + L u +� a a U U a +V "a C Q A N N — � i C � += = a > C C a O += a N ° 3 g� ° 3 o fO w a, U U ° u a oN c on U H co > oA 7 t a a a N 'v C a C f0 H N U N a,,, E •O O O M N O a Q f0 - C +O 4- to lF L v -0 L L +•+ a O 3 O Ln Ln a)(O C 4-- E L NQ- CO +, ; M ptU O 4- CL Q CN V ° LO . JQ CL o CL CL CL CL 6 0 N °° E H •� 7 rn L L OA a a a uJ O3 > U > > V of w Co >� `—° LL IA •Vf -o .X OL +'' V 4J Vf O dA '� +' L (6 > Q a C a Q U � +' C -C ° + 1 O C 4- a •E C ++ +1 +, C L 4. to a E = +� cC +, L 7 C > a a r T •3 a O L t +' 'N N 7 L O R N U Q +, a C a O +' U E a N N M O LL N ai U ._ _ U on C > O a f0 O ns C a (A ai CL 3 Y N a .0 t6 UO a +(U Q. N Q N O C a C ° Q C co +� > v p a E a O a N U C co O a CL �" y to L a) N -0Q v O f0 N N a j a N O U 0o O L1 +, +, ca V C a t U U ,� O > _Q C a O a C m t i to m L — a ° v O a 4- L 0 -W41 0 4= � m .� a � C X � � d o0 ° ai ++ L �_o a a N C O ° N a o 03 Y O L N n3 dA s CLO ° 3 0 t p W t > w y d v O o +� N a V �p O d 4+ a +, N U t C .O C a a s Q > C +� �^ to O O �' a C +J L a Q x O :; C Q O -O L O 'a a oC a � Q = o0 a) `� o Z U cu 0 ++ Q" � = iNif C O = O W bn CL 4-1 Q 0 +, 0 f0 is N a C C 4+ >^ Q- ,� N Z O -a vi a U N 3 a3, L CU a aci a 30 a + z :3 E CUN a U C a �i H i W ++ a Z U cu cu > N c a s 3 — 7 > W a s O "O m _ � E o o L 3 � o CL v a s 0 a � E 4., E 0 a a p U C t 0 w a M 0 OD .0 C o C = -0 OD 0 C E Ln +' L Y m +j � 0 3 Ln = -C + C U +- U fC T Q a) O v Lo a O -0 C ra E c U aj X = 0 O Ln p 0_ = - M a o v m E a c'j E O a -0 '0 _ +-1 N N l9Ln > +, !Z V N OD C Q p OD a to O L > N it 0 -0 a t a E E vi 3 OCD fL6 L2 p OQ C foo +' +1 � O O p L OD ..0 C a _ U t a L a a E .p — +' +d = ai o_ CL 4-1 4-1 Y v > 3 t N N = m a fU +' co L a T U T l0 Q N C L L = L Y Lo 3 a a a p a O- -0 m L +1 O u "a WCOC L a _ N ~ C L.L t to U -0 '� Y •N Y Q O aj N t U O Y d LU +J N 4- ra a to `—° Q N — to a > ar — 2 U C N m T LL6 d U .3 O LU 4� f0 •V ci7 a a +' Q = V) L •i i C O N a) = OCD a 3 +•+ O -C OD o Q t o N O 4- �y +� 3 +, 0 4- N La O r I to a +., Lo H a p C to L N OA � "a L) a 4- C C - >' f0 a U M N •L +••+ >Q C CC OD C 03 -0 U f6 bD C a O C — +L+ J Y j N U U E v t E 0 a } 4' — LU Q) 0 CL N 0 OOA a !Z io D t = U a ++ L O a = 0 m +••+ LU C +T+ C a = E a LO += +' N O +� +' Ov p +�+ 'U 3 m U a +� a v f6 a +� -0 a) N � y co I� +, -0 m C a U a U `� C C C ++ U Lo E - C O O Q a = u _ L c C 0 +, 'N ++ a 6 o a Q p 0 a) '- C 0 C W O OD -a a = Q w U a 0 - = C O O to O E Q a C 0 C t*a a Ln 3 CL o OCD o a � Lm N .- o E Q_ N m ++ L a 'L LLa v _ -0 CL +' C +��, r p a t N a +r 4� a M5 3 E -C = T 3 E o — E oCD C +� L OD += — a to O T L=) N C a to o to ro :> a o0 R T CL a M M a o N L t U U a N i C +J a O 0 E to Q N t o O N L LL -0 m bD,� 0 X 4- t p 3: Lo t iZ Q 3 C N O O o -0 U a LLo - U O N L p +, a ai U Q a N p � N a O a +1 m O v C T 4� C 0 > -O a) a a o U 4- U 0 f6 a s o U 3 .E w a E `� 4, ~ a a o L LN3p d N N •N N tCoD UUa L Q LL OC Q -d .LI) n > +_ t LL C4- loD ao U C a O +• O = = Z w a C *= C +- N EO = Q O Z U i O oa) a O EO N N o N 7 M > C (7 4� i OU N u aQ L a a a +' O 0. a " W a H 3 m 2E +, > Ln U N N "ZS 4- 1= 0 c O i � Vf O La� S C6 (L6 ++ ccu E a1 L r-I CL s :3 p 4- o p O o O c (ti• 0\ ? a=+ `�° 00 .+>—, (° ° p O bb O cu N CMo o E N N c opn v > C7 � o c m o .3 3 a, 00 > v >, O m LM L.L 'L a"' cu — O Oo N Cf3 0 OD O C L O � cu p O CU c Z p aJ Q cu LM M 0 �, M Co +1 p ?� "a +, +, mc Ln ca � OU co _O c N aJ O > " p c U •vi O 0- 0 OD a p >- E 0 O CO QJ -0 p LO i +' o to U c LU p_ a) L - Q c >- Q H N C CO O Q (>6 j o E a1 00 N U L OU Q p (6 O V1 i O a1 o N p > U t a) O j CL Q � L p >� :3 ~ Q Q CL s ° s u " ° O = E o G o CO c an m (� 4- L X a� °1 C t Co Nai 4-1 76 rY 7 Q Q > i ice- v CQ 1Ln t U t O 0 N �- >° o c ? OD "a N c L c c c O — L ..0 ° }, la U D C 00 CL6 i O Q CO L v Q +r 0 U j aJ E L CL Ln N f6 0 t ° o > W +0+ L c O c ,O LL 0 l+' o ° ' >ro Q C OD 4- M Oo v N .0 Q o GJ O O l" > L 4-1 +, O L m w L LU V i c p lD L bD 0 i w w LL 1n U V -0 N fO O Q CF_ N CL +, L Q o oOD m v M O O a t E Q a'- p Co +J m c Ln p U •3 n Ln 'E -0 0 L1 -O > ^o a) m CO OD 3 N ra 4- N L y m � pp ° O L *, 1 r, o c O°�D = i (v aj a) U m ra fO a) rrs = m DD OD � c p v L ri O aJ a1 t 'a a1 U 7 4- 4-1 O O o U _0 L ++ aJ N c N _ V a) c Q c �t O 3 a) a) c w c 'a ri m Ch i t L Ln }moi cu I'D 4.1 N Ln 0to L w N 0 Ln � ate+ O 0 (6 o a) L 3 O L NO N Ln 0 aJ c �_ Q aJ p L a) >j aJ N 0 O ?� -p CO L 0 O +, a� Ln O L 0 +' t 0 m c w 'a co U +' O to ._ of 'a .� CO V a) Q cu 0 'a-� •0 +, O i a) 1n CO aJ en 11 O u a) c N o lO Oo c Co _O Y aJ 4-1 0 M U N � �= c X Q s LPI O a1 a>J U Q E a1 t O O 0 O m 01 0 v c L c O O W 3 C � L 0- .0- 0 co C0 0 v > 1n Q `—' C +� CU i l0 ate- n N E U •Q 0 c O (6 -0 a1 U L U •c U f0 1n m O 3 Q Co > o c L o ri = v m > o ra w Y v i m a N Y > 1 O 1n N U C c a1 �` 1n a1 >. 0 O y (r, > 0 ° a) 'O U C v0i CLO ° 4' O N 0 OD 4- = ,� O N -p c 0 �- = o +' � 3 � -0 v c > L z O ON Ln Qj O Q m >� i .- 4� w 1n o Z m 0 > v o U -a o p +' O N p N N O U O c Ln U O c 1n a1 3 Q c 01 V O O N O O c >>� .� p0" O CL 2 d OU 0 3 C6 - H On Q N > � d Q w 0 4.1 O Q aJ C aJ 3 N O NO -r- a) U C aJ Q C .-, C 0O O O O CD O fC a-+ L N N + a_' ? aJ 3 a) tvo C �= O OA N '� C � C O CQ CO 3 U a) C C N a) a1 N 4 C C f0 N a) I L C U O V E c *' R ° v Q 3 ° c o O C Q O u v V dA O i v r\ v t 4— M 0 - C ai H +�+ U Q pOp O M M a U to U t p 'N a c`o E � � o C bA o 3 ° m ° C O c a� rHcar, "•a- o u ai to OA ? ° O c ° °a "aa) M 0 u -0 v tC LM CIJ o° c ° v 3NcaC aa) = u Q „ - Hn• L C oui O ° Q m a ' Q O uO " O O �> -a 3 C O O (U ° .N 7 O L ai O O al ° Q LL tw tw u ai +J + O y .> ,C N m c Q ma E aJ v i ++ 7 V) O Vf \ N a1 N L w cu GJ cL L ai CD u CL +1C 41 aj N O � m L 'a C lu aj 4L 3 CL v L C, 3 o '^ Q' a> > io E > N m +J m 3 > Q 3 L O 'O E +� ` O v O GJ VI h a-• W W U O O cf6.� Q Q O -a J t}if m N Q aicu mc _ 00 ,n 3 +� c a, tNo f0 n O •4.1 £ O u LU Ocu aj !2 +- o co v ° O Q c=3 aJ = to ° 0 4- -O W C GJ %- °mm +O.• 0 vi 'a ++ 3 a1 v to � •Vl O ° i LJ E c a) Q •N +�+ i a1 Q aJ O N O O O O 3 Q ca ° `� O 0 coo O N c>o > c s O C - a1 ro N C O O w m O oD O m -a C) i U yCL c ° v ° v +' O ai of V N `� to -O O C C ++ m M -Cp ++ o �; L N O +O' +' N O Q N i1 i f0 p O •C "a s C .� O O N m m '1r CL LL cn U >m .� uM 4- 0 .Q a O O L > C aJ O Q �•'' L QJ C N 4 O O ,U f6 O Q C 7 a1 a) O x N U L ? M fL6 +J H E = i C +•+ u C> L t U a � ° u u 3 D o v M O o V Lau O m 3 Q- .� U L N Ln C-4 m m a1 ate"• 4- Z i I L W f6 ++ C N oN N > m F Lcli ai v Q +- — O o O m i ° m Q75 LL > N O O m D V E +, N OU LL L ON z 0 p t c t _ *' Q °° o 0 ° +, +� O E O m = 0 N *' M1 ,o C C w 4o � E a M f0 ° w m Q O Ln CN a a) �1 E O O -0 > +r N U aj 0 a1 C 'O m 00 on utw C - v1 N 4Q+ M m of '— aJ in +p m t v O > (M6 +J a) L Ln V1 cu L j m OD to M L +J O O FuO O u m N O 6D m L (J LL +� m w a a�+ L ° > Q C Q } p a O +� 3 aj C C a) H O u O -0 m N t 1 a) N O OD LL O = H C m C i ++ _ Ln C J a — m U O m i 4LU O — •U Q C C = O V) 3 m 0 O 6D 3 L d O O C L O v O -� 3 _ ? O C 7 OD QO � ° i = Ncr mo ai u +� u m " w O N O aJ } bp C E C C +, L Vf 3 C a) J O ai au > p C m p ° v> > Y u E a, Q Q — aj ,,, R G � �..� Q *, Q '3 a c oD a) u o 3 N L u a ,� += 0 t t w d m E m C v = V) E +� u aj LL Q. O Ln > } mo L +.+ U s C CL O U L (V m a t T a+' E +J -0 ru Ln m .� 3 — E IA M V) aj f0 0) N > C O C LE m In aJ ++ s O 2- C � m aC Q a) U- a)a) a) O C +- C Q 4 OE ) U •i O .0 C a1 UA M a) E a w C C 'a O Y m a) a-+ ti4 C 0) m U .3 L L O E L > V L m v) 0 C N O 4- p p +, 4- 0 2 v a Q. Q- E c o a> > 3 m 'n 3 E c = Q 00 O M } E O N a Vi X N O O a1 0 V) O Q Q �..1 N O U -0 4- ° L aJ +, L Q 0 7 mm d7 �� a1 C a1 > aJ > U +J m O L O p `n 0 .o tw a1 C o o f E C v O i (6 (L6 � += OD 7 N O µ- O 0 V) OD `� 0 u0 a)4J 'a v N O O C p C C •� 7 ,L m o O 4a LL LLD C VQj ; •aj '� (V a � 'O m N m O � 4 a, 3 0 'C m L E L E `L° v o z t0 O w L Q C Q aJ CL a) L t N ° m E O z m -O 3 Q L _p -° a a) O 3 +� o +1 ° a o v ° m vpi T3 u IA W O V L 4, Q L H L m a Q }+ 0 o 3 ea)2 \ % / k \ 2 \ u p W tA C CL = o £ 0 0 > � % 7 3 ) 7 u : @ % k / / 2 - m E ' mc '2 u § / o r- a) c u Q R \ / E u6> U G \° � © � m 4-; CL 2 cu E 2 / bo/ g / # CL \ ± CU V b 0 0 k ai E ($ C)- w k UD o ƒ a 5 % / \ u / § ƒ R = o £ Y 2 § k ' \ 2 In 0 / ° � 0 V 3 CD 0 - \ aJ F CL 3 E 0 § R § S b 2 � ¥ _ u [ / L 3 e = o M ƒ / 2 0G » ± \ R f k R y C m / § \ E / $ o : O f aiai § f E _ c 2 4- 0 / 7 ƒ ' � a / 7 2 0 J § f 2 k : CU § % - ® o 0 2 v Q E 4.1 f e § j k 2 b c -0 © c 2 = m ai CL -0 / f / \ co k \ / \ 6 - 7 2 0 o _ m ® _ v I CL # ƒ 0 q % / 0 \ -02 o t § CL _ ¥ Y m 3 m c c ® - o , 0 E § K Iq y s u -0 e 2 j S S m« o % kD G _ 2 2 2 � § \ E u / k CA \ / \ / § o § § 0 § 3 § — 3 W > g M cc D cc / 0 / -0 3 R k 0 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of"concentration") Federal Way: Housing Problems in Block Groups Block groups,over 480/a of housing units are cost Swil _ burdened,ACS 13-17 - OOCKTOM - IAAF `' Block groups,over 15% •�+ of housing units are - - overcrowded Cover 1 - - occupant/room),ACS 13- 17 ADELAIDE i MIRROR LAKE Block group,over 48% of housing units are cost- f7Y burdened AND over 15,E i are overcrowded(ACS 13-17) :CALLDONIA s s `— AUBURN >-- ¢ ` FEDERAL WAY , uat:SI + Federal Way City Limits - TACOMA STUCK - i Aatk VI ALGONA � Y PACIFIC TACOMA ''r FDVITA MILTON County of Lang,VJA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Garmtri,F•1ETI/NASA,!iSGS,Bureau of Land Management,EPA,NPS,USDA There are areas in Federal Way that have a concentration of households who are low income, or have other housing problem(s), such as overcrowding or being cost-burdened. As housing costs increase in the City of Seattle and its immediate surrounding communities, more households are moving further and deeper into South King County, as well as other areas, where housing has been slightly more affordable.While South King County may be relatively more affordable than Seattle, about 38%of households in Federal Way pay more than 30%of their income toward housing costs (ACS 13-17). Census block groups with a concentration—defined as 10%above the overall percentage in the City—of these cost-burdened households are seen across the city, in North Federal Way,the Mirror Lake area west of the downtown, southern areas of the downtown, the Westway neighborhood, and nearby areas in west and southwest Federal Way to the city limits. Of about 7,600 units in these 11 block groups, about 4,200 or 55%are cost-burdened. With the high cost of renting in King County, households will often "double-up"to reduce the financial impact of housing.This can be characterized by HUD as overcrowding(more than one person per any room, not only bedrooms).ACS 13-17 indicates that in Federal Way about 5%--or about 1,700—of nearly 35,000 occupied housing units are overcrowded. Concentrations of overcrowding can be seen in just Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 40 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) four block groups—one in the Star Lake area of North Federal Way and the other three in the central/western part of the city around the Adelaide-Mirror Lake areas. In these block groups, of about 2,000 households therein, 25% (511) are overcrowded. Another housing problem is lacking complete plumbing facilities. ACS 13-17 estimates that about 0.2% of Federal Way housing units fall into this category.This is less than 100 units.There is no block group in Federal Way that has a concentration (>10.2%) of housing units that lack complete plumbing facilities. There is one block group in Federal Way showing a concentration of overcrowded and cost-burdened households.This is a block group of about 500 housing units in the southern portion of the Mirror Lake area. Of these, 260 (52%) are cost-burdened. About 22% have more than one person per room in the household. Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of"concentration") An examination of census block groups in Federal Way city limits shows where there are concentrations—defined as 10%above the overall percentage in the city—of racial/ethnic minorities or low/moderate income (LMI) households. These are block groups wherein at least 50%were racial minorities, at least 27%were Hispanic, and at least 63%were LMI.There are 25 such block groups in the city. Of these, 21 fall in and around the State Route 99 (Pacific Highway South or SR-99) transportation corridor, roughly bound to the north/northwest by State Route 509 and to the east by Interstate 5. The other four block groups lie in south/southwest Federal Way. Federal way: Block Groups with Concentrations of LMI or Racial/Ethnic Minority Block groups with over w 630k of population as LMI,over 50%racial _ 1 minority,or over 27% DOWN '- Hispanic ethnicity(ACS - - 11-15) ��ryryyy� UK. W,sl Federal Way City Limitsfps P ADEIAIDE - WItl10R -� rAiEsaaeu { p ti AUBURN f FEDERAL � —- tM1iY•" ------------ t M SMCK TAC016I ALDDNA lmng,uu Rd PACIFIC s. .. JDVITA --- TACOMA 5 HILTON Aih til I. King County I County of King,1VA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Garmin,METI/NASA,USGS,Bureau of Land Management,EPA,NPS,USDA Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 41 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? SR-99 Corridor:The areas of the SR-99 corridor with concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities or LMI households include 21 census block groups out of the 25 citywide that show these concentrations. The 21 block groups in this part of the SR-99 corridor consist of several neighborhoods, such as the downtown and northern Federal Way.The latter includes a Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA). Both the NRSA and the downtown are the subject of the City's ongoing efforts and attention to rehabilitate and improve the quality of life of those neighborhoods. In these 21 block groups, there were about 33,000 people (ACS 2011-15).About 49%were racial minorities, and about 23% identified as Hispanic.According to HUD's most recent data available (using ACS 2011-15), about 70%of the population was low-or moderate income.This is nearly 23,000 people. Compared to many cities, Federal Way housing is relatively new, with 54% built after 1980(ACS 2013- 17). Similarly, in this part of the SR-99 corridor, about 45%of structures were built before 1980.A visual review of the housing stock reveals that the primary need relative to condition of housing is the result of deferred maintenance, which in some cases has left properties in need of major repair. Many homes and rentals need minor repairs to maintain the integrity of the housing. Manufactured homes in the area are in need of energy/safety improvements.The lack of financial resources is a major barrier for many of the area's homeowners, especially for seniors. Paint and fix up of housing and yards is needed to build neighborhood and homeowner pride. South/Southwest Federal Way:The other four block groups that have LMI or racial/ethnic minority concentrations are in south/southwest Federal Way.There were about 7,000 people (ACS 2011-15) in these block groups.About 40%were racial minorities and 37% identified as Hispanic. According to HUD's most recent data available (using ACS 2011-15), about 70%of the population was low-or moderate income.This was about 5,000 people. About 38%of structures in this area,which includes the Westway neighborhood,were built before 1980. In the past 20 years,Westway has been among the foci of stabilization and revitalization efforts within the city.As recently as 2011,the City received nearly$1.7 million in HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds through the Washington State Department of Commerce to acquire troubled properties and, upon rehabilitation,sell them to low-and moderate income households.The City worked with Habitat for Humanity to acquire and rehabilitate these homes. Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? SR-99 Corridor:Assets in the SR-99 corridor area include the downtown with all of its redevelopment and revitalization projects (see MA-45), such as Town Square (phases I-IV).The area includes the current transit center and the future light rail stations that will connect Federal Way to the rest of the major employment and business markets in the region.The downtown itself is a major regional destination for retail, dining, and entertainment in South King County, particularly with the Performing Arts and Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 42 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Entertainment Center(PAEC). Commercial shopping centers anchored by supermarket chains, as well as smaller strip malls, are seen in the downtown and also throughout the corridor. There are education and recreation assets in the corridor. Schools located in the area include: Adelaide Elementary, Lake Grove Elementary, Mark Twain Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Panther Lake Elementary, and Federal Way High School. Natural areas include 17-acre Laurelwood Park, Steel Lake Park, French Lake Park, Fishers Pond Park, Celebration Park, and Town Square Park. In addition to transportation, commercial, educational, and recreational assets, several government and private organizations provide services in and/or targeted at the NRSA and surrounding areas in the corridor. Multi-Service Center provides food security and rental assistance/homelessness prevention. Highline College Small Business Development Center helps residents therein to start their own businesses, including microenterprises. Habitat for Humanity helps low income residents with home repairs and improvements.The City's home repair program also provides home repair services in this area. South/Southwest Federal Way:The City has worked collaboratively with Habitat for Humanity of King County in the Westway Neighborhood.The City began working with Habitat for Humanity during the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP3). As a result, Habitat for Humanity purchased and renovated 10 homes in the neighborhood; thus providing 10 families with homeownership and beginning to improve conditions in the area.Though the NSP3 project has been completed,the City and Habitat for Humanity continue to seek ways to partner on home renovations and improvements in the neighborhood. Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas? The northern portion of the SR-99 corridor in Federal Way includes the NRSA area.Since 2017, this has been an area of resource investment that includes CDBG funding for housing repair and rehabilitation, capital improvements, entrepreneurship, and job creation. Going forward, there are strategic opportunities as these efforts lead to more residential involvement and a sense of ownership among those living in the NRSA and, more broadly, northern Federal Way. For example, in late 2019 the City will work with the Build the Bridge coalition—a violence prevention group—and faith groups in the area to convene a roundtable regarding civic engagement and community identity in northern Federal Way. The aforementioned developments in and around the downtown will present strategic opportunities not only for those who live in the neighborhood.The interest and investment which redevelopment spurs will benefit all of Federal Way through services and amenities brought in by new businesses,job creation, and revenue generation to fund more municipal services (including human services). The City will continue to evaluate the potential of additional place-based investments in areas identified in this section.The readiness for such investments will be balanced with available resources. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 43 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Strategic Plan SP-05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview The Strategic Plan is the part of the Consolidated Plan where the City's goals, objectives, and strategies designed to make progress towards achieving those goals and objectives are outlined. Most of the strategies have output targets based on the funding anticipated to be available over the course of the Consolidated Plan from 2020-2024. If funding changes during the five-year period, the City may amend the output targets. As a result of assessing the needs and resources and the community consultation process,the following needs were identified as the highest needs for continued focus. They served as guides in the development of goals and strategies to meet them: ■ Create opportunities for a diverse employee base to live and work in Federal Way by increasing the connectivity of affordable housing,transportation, and employment centers. • Expand programs and activities which enhance the opportunity for low-and moderate-income persons to become more self-sufficient and to increase income to "livable wage" levels. • Consider the potential for stimulating jobs and economic development in the programming of all housing, public services, neighborhood improvement, and public facilities activities. • Seek to provide safety net services for populations with significant barriers, with a particular focus on persons experiencing homelessness, until they are able to reach the goal of self- sufficiency. The identified goals are largely a continuation of the prior Consolidated Plan though homelessness has been moved to its own goal as CDBG and the data systems has specific tracking of progress in addressing homelessness.The four goals are: 1. Expand Economic Opportunities 2. Preserve Affordable Housing 3. Prevent and Address Homelessness 4. Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environments The Strategic Plan covers the following topics: • Geographic Priorities:The City has a current and approved Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area in North Federal Way. Work will continue in that area, but the bulk of the strategies will be City wide. • Priority Needs: Four priority needs have been identified and will be described. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 44 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) • Anticipated Resources:The City has identified CDBG funding and the City's Human Services General Funding as resources available throughout the Consolidated Plan.The City's general fund grants contribute to several of the goals and focus on meeting a wide array of needs for many residents. • Institutional Delivery Structure:This section identifies some of the organizations that will carry out the objectives.Additionally organizations may be added throughout the course of the five years. • Goals:An explanation is provided including strategies and proposed accomplishments and outcomes, as displayed in the Goal Outcome Indicators template. • Lead-Based Paint Hazards:This outlines the proposed actions to evaluate and reduce lead-based paint hazards. • Anti-Poverty Strategies:This section will summarize the City's goals, programs, and policies for reducing poverty. • Monitoring:The standards and procedures are included for monitoring and ensuring compliance with the extensive program, planning, and federal regulations and requirements. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 45 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) SP-10 Geographic Priorities - 91.415, 91.215(a)(1) Geographic Area Table 12-Geographic Priority Areas General Allocation Priorities Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the state Due to the fact that low/moderate-income individuals and families in need of supportive services reside throughout all geographic regions of the city,geographic boundaries will generally not be used as a basis for allocating investments. The exception to this is the area north of the downtown.This area is the focus of the City's Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area and corresponding plan, which was approved in 2016. As part of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan,this area will continue to be targeted for services and improvements in accordance with the goals and strategies of the NRSA plan. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 46 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.415, 91.215(a)(2) Priority Needs Table 13—Priority Needs Summary 1 Priority Need Economic Development and Job Growth Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Non-housing Community Development Geographic Areas Affected Associated Expand Economic Opportunities Goals Description The City of Federal Way has experienced and continues experiencing economic and demographic growth and change. While the City's median income has increased, it has not kept pace with that of the region or increasing housing costs.Additionally, while the local median income has increased, it has not kept pace with the regional area median income growth and remains significantly lower.At the same time,the City is in a unique position for near-future growth as light rail expands into the City and the downtown continues to be a focus of economic investment.With continued planning and strategic investment in economic opportunities,the City and its residents stand to benefit from the growth. Basis for Economic development and job growth are the number one priority for the City Relative of Federal Way.The belief is that economic opportunity for low-and moderate- Priority income households is critical to helping families become and stay self-sufficient. The City's use of CDBG funds is directly tied to supporting business and job opportunities for the populations targeted by the CDBG program Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 47 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 2 Priority Need Affordable Housing Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Geographic Areas Affected Associated Preserve Affordable Housing Goals i Description The City of Federal Way will engage in housing activities, collaborations, and partnerships to enhance opportunities for the creation and preservation of ' affordable housing. During the course of the Consolidated Plan,funding may be prioritized for coordination with the approved Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area in North Federal Way.The city will plan for and support fair housing strategies and initiatives designed to affirmatively further fair housing choice and to increase access to housing and housing programs. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 48 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Basis for The City of Federal Way continues to experience an increase in its population, Relative number of households, housing costs, and median income. Priority Although household numbers and median income continues to increase,the City continues to experience housing problems and an increasing housing need for its residents, which is common throughout the South King County region. South King County has experienced consistently increasing housing costs over the past five years contributing to housing instability and housing cost burdens for low-to moderate-income households. Residents who are low-or extremely-low income suffer from cost burdens greater than 30-50%for both renters and homeowners and other housing problems such as overcrowding and substandard living conditions.These cost burdens can result in eviction,foreclosure and even homelessness for many families.To address these issues the city intends to support programs offered by agencies that provide services to alleviate financial crisis, establish financial stability, address barriers to fair housing choice, and prevent eviction or homelessness.The city will also continue to provide home repair services for low-to moderate-income homeowners in the community. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 49 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 3 Priority Need Homelessness Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Geographic Areas Affected Associated Prevent and Address Homelessness Goals Description Homelessness continues to present a growing issue and need locally and regionally.The goal is to develop a coordinated homeless system grounded in best practices and/or evidence based programming. Components of the regional system include the principle of housing first; investment in projects that ensure households experiencing homelessness from all sub-populations are treated with dignity and respect, return to permanent housing as quickly as possible, receive strength-based services, and move from temporary homelss housing as rapidly as possible; and receive only what they need to return to housing quickly while being as self-reliant as possible. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 50 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Basis for Homelessness is an issue that increasingly is affecting communities including the Relative City of Federal Way and the surrounding region. As housing costs have increased, Priority so have the number of individuals and families experiencing homelessness. It is difficult to accurtely estimate the number of individuals who experience homelessness in a given year, let alone those who are at risk of experiencing homelessness.The most accurate data available is the Point In Time coordinated by All Home King County. While the data is imperfect and undercounts the number of persons experiencing homelessness, it is a snapshot of what occurred on January 25, 2019. It is important to note that the count does not represent the number of persons who experience homelessness over the course of the year.The 2019 count estimated 11,199 individuals were experiencing homelessness on the day of the count. Of those 11,199, 124 individuals were unsheltered in the City of Federal Way.This number does not include Federal Way residents who were engaged in shelter services or other homeless housing. While the count of unsheltered persons in Federal Way has remained relatively stable since the new count methodlolgy in 2017, homelessness continues to be a focus and priority for the City and residents as there are other indicators that homelessness has increased and gaps in necessary services continue to exist locally and regionally. Shared outcomes with King County and the local Continuum of Care include, but are not limited to,the following: 1) reduce the number of households becoming homeless; 2) reduce the length of time that households are homeless; 3) increase the rate of exits to permanent housing; and 4) reduce the number of households that re-enter the homeless system after exit to permanent housing. J Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 51 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 4 Priority Need Living Environment Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low Low Moderate Large Families Families with Children Elderly Public Housing Residents Chronic Homelessness Individuals Families with Children Mentally III Chronic Substance Abuse veterans Persons with HIV/AIDS Victims of Domestic Violence Unaccompanied Youth Elderly Frail Elderly Persons with Mental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families Victims of Domestic Violence Non-housing Community Development Geographic Areas Affected Associated Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environment Goals Description In an effort to meet the need of the City's economic and demographic growth the City intends to fund programs and activities that will enhance the accessibility, safety, and physical appearance of neighborhoods while meeting th basic needs of low-to moderate-income persons and households. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 52 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Basis for The City supports a wide variety of organizations and programs that provide Relative extremely low-, low-, and moderate-income persons and households, as well as Priority the homeless,with services that range from behavioral health to domestic violence assistance to infant care to overnight shelter. The City's Human Services General Fund grant program provides over$500,000 annually, an amount that is demonstrative of the commitment to help those in need. The public services funding available via the CDBG grant allows the City to provide an even greater level of support for community needs that always exceed the resources available. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 53 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) - k m � 2 2 2 2 y .2 § ® 2 @ m $ � -Fom ƒ § © / / § 4- 4-- M 2 ( / \ ƒ A % j 2 / o 2 E k k g / -0 o 0 o 0 ° kU / ' 7 ° ai E c 3 E 0 / . > ® E ° a t .K 0 / u t § f E � 2 3 E ) ƒ 3 -CO) % � C \ (U S = ' z ƒ 2 9 2 E 4- W ° § 2 / R 2 0 � ' x G '> & ® m 6 a) aj / W Ln EO \ $ e k 0 9 . ' _ / E o E � = o � = 3 / k u CL u / k / E 2 k / E 7 2 \ � B J i 0 q 2 0. E m> E u ko Lo � « k 2 % cy� cli CA Lnc § g _ $ / O - k \ cc 1 \ ,-4 \ § \ % cn m _ : ƒ . 0 m 41 k 2 f LU 41 L.L 3E oLn 0 o E @ E 2 « o u e ,4 a £ � m o � 2 / i U q $ 0 (.0m %-4 � 2 § § c cu / - m m k m 2 $ $ _ « E \ § 2E u 0 u a « & C ' § u ` 2 k k ± / $ / / \ 0 ( u § u J § 3 % / / 55 w = u G •g 2 \ aCL2 Q E z Ln CL _ CU - L CL \ / LL u 0 a 0 2 - ( 9 2 2/ o ƒ § £ a) y \ 0 § 0 2 / Lr)u m m m ¥ W § 0 CL - / k \ 2 0 e e kw M 4- ° / 2 � E ¢ � / � / k q ■ Q � \ 'E �f % 7 2 4- 4« ■ � � i ■ E7 2 Ln � / M. 7 � / g \ . .\ } / E R t 7 § / $ g CL j M U \ \ \ / \ < u < f / / \ 3 0 § # Q o CL 0 CL 0 1. \ 0 IA / % / E / $ f _ ou 'n ° 2 « E 2 2 cm « t cu / 2 / % \ tko ± 2 % § L \ ± 0 0 < ° e E k W @ 3 CL ■ 4- -0 2 / m / / 41 2 k CA U) E k CL■ L k k = \ 2 5 2 r c / / / c (U (U / / IA � � ? \ o = ■ 2 § @ c o o e f s f £ 6 @ E ± ± % 2 ƒ \ 2 0 § y f \ c 2 2 � ƒ _ ) . 7 g a Q Q / � Q � \ m m o g u Q E / � 2 f ƒ o / 3 \ SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure - 91.415, 91.215(k) Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions. Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Role Geographic Area Type Served City of Federal Way Government Planning Jurisdiction Apprenticeship and Subrecipient public services Region Nontraditional Employment for Women (ANEW) Birth to Three Family Non-profit Non-homeless special Region Development Center organizations needs public services Boys and Girls Clubs of Non-profit public services Region King County organizations Catholic Community Non-profit Homelessness Region Services of Western organizations Non-homeless special Washington needs Rental public facilities public services Consejo Counseling and Non-profit Non-homeless special Region Referral Services organizations needs public services Crisis Clinic Non-profit public services Region organizations DOMESTIC ABUSE Non-profit Homelessness Region WOMEN'S NETWORK organizations Non-homeless special (DAWN) needs public services Federal Way Non-profit Homelessness Jurisdiction Community Caregiving organizations public services Network FEDERAL WAY SENIOR Non-profit Non-homeless special Jurisdiction CENTER organizations needs public facilities public services Federal Way Youth Non-profit public services Jurisdiction Action Team organizations Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 56 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Role Geographic Area Type Served FUSION Non-profit Homelessness Region organizations public services HABITAT FOR Subrecipient Non-homeless special Region HUMANITY OF needs SEATTLE/SOUTH KING Ownership COUNTY neighborhood improvements Healthpoint Non-profit Non-homeless special Region organizations needs public services HIGHLINE COMMUNITY Subrecipient Economic Region COLLEGE Development public facilities HOSPITALITY HOUSE Non-profit Homelessness Region organizations Non-homeless special needs public services Institute for Family Non-profit Non-homeless special Region Development organizations needs public services l Kent Youth and Family Non-profit Homelessness Region Services organizations Non-homeless special needs public services KING COUNTY PHA Planning Region HOUSING AUTHORITY Public Housing Rental King County Sexual Non-profit public services Region Assault Resource organizations Center King County Bar Non-profit Non-homeless special Jurisdiction Foundation organizations needs public services Mother Africa Non-profit public services Region organizations Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 57 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Role Geographic Area Type Served Multi-Service Center Subrecipient Homelessness Region Non-homeless special needs Rental public services Orion Industries Subrecipient Non-homeless special Region needs public services Pediatric Interim Care Subrecipient Non-homeless special Region Center, Inc. needs public services Puget Sound Training Non-profit public services Region Center organizations Public Health of Government Homelessness Region Seattle-King County Non-homeless special needs public facilities public services Refugee Women's Non-profit public services Region Alliance organizations Somali Youth and Non-profit public services Region Family club organizations SOUND MENTAL Non-profit Homelessness Region HEALTH organizations Non-homeless special needs public services ............ _ ............. Sound Generations Non-profit Non-homeless special Region organizations needs public services St.Vincent de Paul Non-profit Homelessness Region Society organizations public services Valley Cities Counseling Non-profit Non-homeless special Region &Consultation organizations needs public services WAPI Community Non-profit Non-homeless special Region Services organizations needs public services Washington Poison Non-profit public services Region Center organizations Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 58 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Responsible Entity Responsible Entity Role -1Geographic Area Type Served YWCA of Seattle-King Non-profit Homelessness Region County-Snohomish organizations Non-homeless special County needs Rental public services Table 15-Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System Strengths: • Local, South King County, and King County systems collaborate to create a more integrated and comprehensive approach to avoid duplication in services. • Population specific services for seniors, children and families, and ethnic and racial minorities are present throughout the community and systems are working to better support and foster growth of such services. • City supports neighborhood and community collaboration events and projects. Gaps: • There is a shortage of homeless shelters and homeless housing opportunities in Federal Way and the region. • Affordable housing continues to be a challenge with the need exceeding the supply in Federal Way and the region. • Veterans services are primarily located in Seattle, Renton, and Pierce County. • Services to address education, employment, and general needs of youth and young adults. The Multi-Service Center opened the William J. Woods veteran's housing project in Federal Way to serve low-income and homeless veterans.The project opened in 2016 and has 44 one-,two-and,three- bedroom units that exclusively house veterans and their families.This will help alleviate veteran homelessness in Federal Way and King County. Federal Way makes numerous efforts to fill gaps in services throughout the region by supporting emergency service and other supportive service programs. However, as the need for emergency services grows along with the number of residents in the city,the community has experienced a decrease in funding for supportive services making accessibility more challenging for those in need. Housing prices for both homeownership and renting have increased.The area median income has also increased. However, while Federal Way's median income has increased, it has not growth at the same rate.This results in housing that is considered affordable based on the area median income, but may be unattainable and result in residents paying a higher percentage of their income toward housing. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 59 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services Homelessness Prevention Available inthe Targeted to Targeted to People Services Community Homeless with HIV Homelessness Prevention Services Counseling/Advocacy X Legal Assistance I X Mortgage Assistance Rental Assistance X Utilities Assistance X Street Outreach Services Law Enforcement X X Mobile Clinics X X Other Street Outreach Services X X Supportive Services Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X Child Care X X Education X X Employment and Employment Training X X Healthcare X X HIV/AIDS X Life Skills X X Mental Health Counseling X X Transportation X X Other Table 16-Homeless Prevention Services Summary Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) The City of Federal Way has provided funding for, supported, and collaborated with numerous homeless prevention and intervention service providers throughout the region. There are several systems in place to ensure services listed above are made available to and used by people experiencing homelessness. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 60 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) • There are emergency services providers located in Federal Way or close by on major bus routes where those experiencing homelessness and utilizing public transportation can easily locate resources. • King County's Mobile Medical Van visits Federal Way regularly and schedules are made visible at local homeless prevention and emergency assistance service providers' locations. • The City coordinates with homeless outreach teams to network with agencies that work with and serve the homeless population. • The City's police department and local hospital emergency room also work closely with homeless outreach teams to those experiencing homelessness with resources to decrease recidivism and provide supportive services to meet the individual's needs. Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above Strengths: • Organizations collaborate to integrate service delivery. • Funders independently support and partner with anti-poverty service programs and organizations. • Dedicated volunteers and staff providing direct services to residents. • Central point of entry to access services including a Regional Access Point located in Federal Way. • Numerous opportunities for collaboration and integration of services amongst government and nonprofit entities. • The Federal Way Day Center opened in 2016 to provide essential services to individuals experiencing homelessness and has since added limited hours for families. • A family shelter is being developed in Federal Way and expected to open in spring of 2020. • The City and surrouding region has numerous providers specializing in serving special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness. Gaps: • Insufficient or reduction in funding • Frequent systems or policy changes ■ High turnover in direct service providers • Insufficient access for individuals who are not English proficient • Transportation • Lack of regular,year-round shelter for individuals experiencing homelessness Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 61 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs To overcome gaps of the service delivery system, the City will continue to support and work collaboratively with human service providers in the region and local jurisdictions to overcome barriers to program accessibility as well as develop and implement systems and strategies to leverage their current resources while still providing optimal service to residents. The City has a supportive faith-based community in addition to the work of nonprofit agencies. These faith-based organizations focus on homelessness, human service, and self-sufficiency needs. The City's poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinate with the Consolidated Plan by giving funding priority and investing to: • Basic Needs • Emergency assistance programs • Homeless prevention and intervention programs • Economic development programs • Programs targeting underserved and special populations such as seniors, ethnic minorities, disabled, homeless, and non-English speaking residents Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 62 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) � 7 _ ° ® E t 0 u % d I § c i c © E / E -0 E ƒ \ / \ \ / u m / £ S \ k 2 } 0 f 0 3 2 k k § aj _0 I a > i \ LA / k m $ § £ / k aj k / V / 0 V) 0 . ° § E _ 2 U o . ° 0 CO \ E � k / ƒ � Ecu % �/ E c � / $ ƒ $ a \ \ k / $ / \ 6 00 00 .b 0 _ = m = 00 CO 0 E \ E 7 E 7 _ = w LL -L4 V). 2 7 V u EA E ° « •E / / 7 § 2 \ E \ ( ƒ / s � ± 0 7 k } } M § k � LU 0 LU L.L c 2 0 \ k k m § 3 I E / 2 3 5 / / 0 k \ k M -:* \ R* � % % q m _ 0 0 0 m Cj th >- IN N / 7 � 2 7 \ \ m Ln § \ \ � 2 \ � E m c k I '� $ % r RT o z u \ ° § & k ( 14 7 2 / /y u & c o t m \ a) E a § o § E E Lu o $ 2 fLn Q § � z Ln _ 2 § �� - m u k 0 c �- t on 4-� c G) L L CL 4 t ° a O V O _ dA Ln c c v E O N Gl ON O u 3 + c 0 O O u N = 41 R G) Q LL "a 7 G) +' in 41 � O O u [2 c -0 c c o LA a� 3 c 0 =03 M. m� 2 w Ln U N V,' O OG m M C D Lnj U C I� U. 'O G) h L a E IA N w O L Z c J W L (6 E V_ E CL Ln t 3 } M jL N � Gla ° a < W n 0 W G) L L m f6 C H N C C f6 ° O U E O O O G) Z U in N OO O LY } N i L O CN +�+ G) O c !A } N (0 +� 00 C) N mo +' 0 o Z N CL O axi O to w U O C o * Cco >_ o W G J N 6 Z L L G) O N � c O U m 0 L O ticL ++ � N L L QJ O Mo N O N L (O O 3 4 +s+ E O Q t as•• 0 tka 3 :3 CL __ ai °' c o 3 cL m m L Q M O 0 m 1.0 m °° o E v o E aJ +O+ U ti0 O = M N fC _ O E d w- t OU 41 M 1 f0 i Go d., L a c Q- a -0a •mac-, aJ 41 E 0s v LL o � s u L � 3 C ° Z L° oD c CL = c v N E s c U m v t +� > N E ra aJ o ? ba m o Q > H = N v :a V a g 0 to aJ +; m co N s N 4 4- -. 4+ c O s � p L rLo f6 s > .� v a c o s o Ln oA +� -0 N IA N -0 H N U O •c N f° aJ s O M O w to 3 E L OD O cu 0 as tw a s E 4' o u o aJ L— +' O N s Ln O ++ �, f, 4) m dD W a) f6 W O _� 3 O N 01 an c -0 m = +, c = w -a O tw O O s 3 C + c U al = aJ OBD SOD U s O O O O O OA "a aJ a a/ y N Q 0 C O H � O � = H _ = ma, axi u 3 .- m ° 3 0 c ,� > 4J E O aJ o ° t a a=i °=D = o ° 'C E ++ �n c a o w 0 c `_° c o o C o o s s axi CL a) +J 3 ar CL 0 CbD a 3CL 0 m p " aJ L +� dD p = •E -0 = c O u QJ }, 0 � L w a vs L a Q 3 0 N a 0 U — 0 aJ O LL a t O a w u 4- vii W-1 V-1 epi y Q RN = N a o a aJ 'pD OD 00 OD _ !Z E f0 f0 f6 f0 •N �• a) O 1? a a) i E i N x O +� +� +� 3 *' �' s �' o CL o L � o � c a LU in v) N N s U a �, t &A s v) o a N U O 0 a� = a, _ '++ E O E O °o ,Q• f9 Q. f0 L N V Z L Z L Z GO O a) O O a) _ 0 .........._.. - U O e•I N m C7 0 _ 0 T c +J ca .� on a� V � +, c o a, Ln v - a) N CN of 'v U pp > N E f0 c LA ra -0 U O H ° N 3 a) N c m aJ ° L Ucu aj +_ E N c y O U v E v = = ar d iii L a) N c U a1 to O � O w a+ L N 4' 'a aA N - in ° a) t 0aj 0 c — U Ln O Q (6 C c N L 47 i hQ L V, +' U �a 3 a) +N •N c N c H 3 "a m O O O Lnvi }-T' O N L 3 0 o s a) s ° 3 O ° ° +� H o E ° s " CL 75 4- ° L O +J c C. E a L L p ° +,Lj OU v N O aJ d E O4ml 4- ,n „, v, L4 a) n •c m v o v a`) c 4m- +1 � N t c +, = ° ° ° 3 - 3 vim, ria c vOi p Q E v, m ° 4 ° = O cco v Y `� `� t - > H ++ c O U O 3 N aJ M O �O CL N L OA a) O V a) j of ro N N a1 upi N N 3 £ LwL fC O U a) - c N t O cu -0 > E o s '> L 4 m bA O N U +, 4� 'a N H Q -a > L cn U a)4-1 O 'E a) n t M O m CL OJ -a cp L 3 c T O m i E dA H 4+ C• Q U a) C. u O O c O 0 O OC oA 3 E Q Q N -0 'a +� 3 p O v, W N O c �_ +- N t L v, V, c 4- 4- C O y O O W N 3 u m �_ 4.1 O 3 O Y Q O +O+ u v, L L.L W '> V f6 O _ 'L Q a) Ln '> C L m c LU 0 LA -2a1 H on O �+ > s c N � 3 E ai ,n O c = O'^ c 3 tin +� co aJ p > N Q °°° " ° m t E a� ° v ani c c N a' c awi o fl E a n - Q >•• p. E c _ ° O LO o c Q U o c a) i .- m E EGJ m 4- E In 0 'U O O N 3 O = m V, 'X a) a) c O 4- Ln U N ` "a N f0 f6 O. w O a) L w C• L O c 3 c CL O aJ aJ }' L 3iM O +�,, '] CL m (O f0 of (6 4-1 > •> Cy to L ° > as c c +' '� ,n > a o ° >_ c o � O o O on s em cX o L w c- O O M M > +� a) � aJ a) 0 f0 O O 4. .0 f0 > a) O U �n •� '> 4- N c Ll a) N E aA da .�^ M O L M a) L-+ .� a) 4- Oa da tw L � om O V L ns v w +_ _s O a) n +, a) N U w w N a1 - > ro O O O L V N i i +�+ N Q a) N +' a) i i i t ri a F- c .� (A V) U, w Q OU Ln H C E t of H H 30 a U c C o E O E O 1O 0 fa O. m Q. N z •L z •L o v u z O O a(') O O in aa)) ° (7 C7 D C7 C7 c - - U M � � 0 a� O L- M M •3 c O u c � M H � •L O 3 � •� a1 GJ � t �> +� O E Q O >, s 3 � O 16 +•0 `^ o a� r_ N •E a) f0 O Q O u � a1 •1 .0 O � Q) J v a c � � � � w o ai a, w E U LL O v u L c =a O f) — � N Ln c EM urj w 'T W O 2 o > E °L' n y o -0 40C a o X O Nrq co d p � O O o w N O C tw r ti 7 •N o O o S t L N +•� a 4- 0 z R fd o E V0 �O u° H �: m W M F-- 2 O SP-65 Lead-based Paint Hazards - 91.415, 91.215(i) Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards It is the City of Federal Way's goal to reduce the number of residential units in the City with lead-based paint hazards.The Federal Way Home Repair and Rehabilitation Program (and other residential rehabilitation activities the City may undertake)will fully comply with lead-based paint hazards requirements. In the design of housing repair and rehabilitation activities,the City will set standards and procedures to inspect and test properties as appropriate and develop a checklist for site inspections. This will apply to all residential units and homes constructed prior to 1978, as required.The City will utilize lead-certified contractors in inspection and rehabilitation programs. Homes testing positive for lead-based paint or identified as having lead hazards will be stabilized or abated consistent with HUD guidelines by certified contractors.The City will actively promote safe lead practices. How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? The actions mentioned above will apply to all residential units and homes constructed prior to 1978, as required. The City will utilize lead-certified contractors in inspection and rehabilitation programs and require this for all subrecipients and contractors.The City actively promotes safe lead practices, including guidance and requirements in our Home Repair Program policies. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 68 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy - 91.415, 91.215(j) Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan focuses on meeting the needs of low-and moderate-income persons. Within that group are persons living in poverty, persons more vulnerable than other lower- income groups because of their extremely limited resources.Twelve percent of Federal Way families live in poverty. The City's long-term goal is to reduce the percentage of families living in poverty and increase family independence. Among the City's goals is the creation of jobs at livable wages. CDBG resources will be used for critical supportive services. Some services are designed to provide a safety net for families and individuals so they achieve stabilization. Other services provide opportunities for persons to strengthen living skills, reduce debt, build assets, and achieve career progression in order to reduce poverty and increase self-sufficiency. The City cannot accomplish the task of reducing poverty alone. Financial assistance from the federal, state and county sources will be critical to success as is the collaborative strength of the regional environment in which Federal Way operates. Coordination with the King County Housing Authority, a variety of nonprofit social services agencies, local educational institutions,faith-based organizations,the business community and the surrounding cities and the County is essential.The City actively seeks and continues to work toward alignment with regional plans and working toward results-based framework and outcomes to move the City from a crisis response model to one that includes more prevention- based services and opportunities for residents. As noted previously,the City invests over$500,000 of its general fund in support of services to low-and moderate-income persons and households, including persons experiencing homelessness. The general fund grant program has been in existence for more 20 years and the investment has increased. Over time, more programs that are preventative or seek to assist households in changing their situations have sought funding through the grant program.The City continues to explore the best avenues for supporting and encouraging a range of services from those addressing urgent crises and basic needs to others that build skills, education, career opportunities, and financial literacy. Additionally,the City of Federal Way promotes increased opportunities for a range of housing choices and costs to meet diverse needs.This includes promotion of higher densities, particularly in areas close to transit and amenities,such as those available in retail centers.The City offers an affordable housing density bonus for development requiring rental housing developments of 25 units or more to provide affordable housing units in exchange for allowing additional units. Incentives in the downtown include a tax exemption which encourages both density and affordability. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 69 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan The City invests its CDBG resources into a variety of programs that seek to reduce the number of families and individuals living in poverty. CDBG-funded public services will provide the supports mentioned above.The housing repair program will help stabilize families by decreasing housing costs and improving safety,while helping households to maintain an important asset. Finally,the City's Community Economic Revitalization activities will provide direct benefits to persons through job creation and through assistance to microenterprises owned by low-and moderate-income persons. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 70 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) SP-80 Monitoring - 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements The City of Federal Way has established effective mechanisms for ensuring compliance with federal and non-federal requirements as well as contract and programmatic goals are achieved. Internal processes include the development of ongoing compliance with comprehensive planning for the CDBG program. Staff regularly read new CPD notices and participate in training to ensure high-level program compliance. For internal projects,the City has established internal controls including financial and programmatic policies.The City's Community Services Division has primary responsibility for ensuring compliance and monitors projects in a manner similar to subrecipient projects. The Community Services Division has established a subrecipient monitoring manual that guides the City in ensuring compliance with requirements of the CDBG program.Staff primarily utilize HUD Monitoring Guidelines in establishing areas to be monitored,focusing on compliance with HUD and other applicable federal regulations as well as ensuring funds are spent in a timely manner. Contract compliance, eligibility, record keeping, and performance in meeting anticipated outcomes will also be key components of monitoring. In monitoring subrecipients,the City plans to use the following five tools: • Program policies • Contractual obligations of grant recipients • Reports • Audits • Desk and on-site monitoring The City intends to maintain frequent contact with the funded agencies. Prior to the beginning of each year,the City will prepare a brief plan/schedule of monitoring activities. This will include plans for on- site and/or desk monitoring of all public services grants. Other CDBG-funded activities will be monitored using risk factors to determine the schedule. The City supports and seeks ways to engage minority businesses. When procuring services and contractors, the City reference the Washington State Minority and Women's Business Enterprises directory and encourages subrecipients to do the same in procurement.Additionally, the City has established business and microenterprise technical assistance as an important strategy to engage minority-owned businesses and encourage the establishment or growth of such businesses. Current microenterprise programs include non-English speaking and immigrant outreach components designed to meet the City's diverse needs. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 71 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 4- 3 $; / / S 3 2 2 2 F \ R 2 CL w ® :5 E 2 ¥ 0 � e o E k � { f � / � � 7 CL / cu > / a- e M _ q \ C % 2 k ƒ / / bD % a v � 3bo / / g o / $ $ / > � � \ § _ E 4u- +1 § k uCL E / ƒ W C � 7 CLE ± w @ 41 0 LLI = 3 = E E CL / ) / ,-4 ' § 4- \ / U § 0 k � � � E b § § / \ 0 u 7 � - R q ) _ 00 CL w a g Cl) 0 O / FZ 2 \ \ � ® ? \ / LL Q) � 3 0 ( / ) ® = u & u & § / cy cli 2 nm0 o m ° CU w o u . 27 \ u O g uLn _ V-47 u . . t W 3 { ± § b 2 ) a� Q £ CL C4 o § F- 0 4- a) a, ( 3 m m O U 4- a ooo— ° o ° c rcaau� l O m 0 °°u 0 o c> M a... O L L OA 'u O O CL fl. ++ m •- a) 4- 0 O N a U ++ •L .� N tLo "a O O o h C .0 L O a) O' L Q •� r- Q) c M Q a) W bA v a)Ln 3 � 3 °�° o co WU U ° o on oA O c N . +' Q fLD N U c O OC ;= j vi C L 4J 'N O m v QJ 'a N U t '� 'O Ln Z —LA M .2 > L c } a) a) a 3 c () 4- n3 CL a) a) -0 a) L L7 en U > N m -a E O L a) C O o L C ...Q UO m OU Q OU (�6 "a E ("u . � Q aF ----------- C I� O a r+ a) a mu � � -0a O G a o' m � +� M o Lo O r-i 00 N O LL Q Q a) w lD m O M N m +O+ T Ln f0 a+ -+ H m t/} 00 O .� 4l a` H t m I m L 00 Ln H > m (U •LCL >- L in N O L .••. M N 3 y i J f0 L i? L^ � L 'f0 H rl •0 3 w Q a wv LU O D ++ C N L 11 O d O 0. p LN f0 E L E Q p u O w41 _ •— "a CL rn X m C p0 LU LD O Q _0 lD Lf) +S+ Q tko m L- 4- y V) en N O C C U U IC 7 a) a) LL O C U E E L O d w +.� l0 0D O. GD a) LQ) N -p 00 3 (U >o a 3 -0 o 7 u 'a (0 U v O7 7 — � „) Q Q a w 2 a D_ a 0 0 3 w • _ � C CCL i a) �, — O O v O U 0cu -U. •U � U L � U 0 . V L O H QQ a O 3 L Ln N +(U+ E — O tip z n3 s a � a� c o •� O m c •� E a UO L.L Q. m v ED Q — W E 2 0 v O 4- N a� U L O N Q) L m L Q) Q) O 41 L E L O .N v v 0 L Q L- 12 bD c L 3 Q) Q) 4� Q� O L L! C Q O O v +� Ln vw J .Q O Q w m ,} w m O LL CLQ) m O O N O_ co E m O U Om U N C m Q) N A ++ C Q) � t Q) ~ d4 C t m aJ a m v co N 4 m m m � m O C CL N O v L V a� O O 1 C m O O O - Ln N N C O Z Q O 4 Y C m � U 0 X m U a) 2 0 If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan The City of Federal Way owns the Performing Arts and Event Center(PAEC), which continues to be included in the Consolidated Plan. As described previously in this plan, the PAEC will generate jobs both directly and via acting as a catalyst for redevelopment of the downtown area. Discussion The City of Federal Way considers publically owned land or property for potential projects and will continue to do so as projects arise throughout the period of the Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 75 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Ln % _ 4- 4- 2 k = : k d 0 0 s # g $ to # e g 2 § o 3 d , = o = g 0 ILn= \ g £ e § t � \ $ E < 0 $ § a E g % / E ° 2 § s $ 3 o U 9 \ f � / / ƒ \ « ° ƒ m o o 2 -3 � •§ S k 0 C o § 2 $ \ M L, -0 R ° a � f o u $ S o / k ' § f / 3 0 E I E k 3 ƒ = o § g ® o # o aj = 2 o c m ¥ = < I e I a- = I w u 0 0 0 � E % q % 0 c 2 / �u u ro u � m § t ) t � 2 @ / = u & E g « { 5 m E > -0 § CL 2 ° f .E k m § Q 2 § > / _ . $ ±0 aj 2 < k \ L �. . m 0E > � CL a ca t # R � � $ $ ƒ Ira © LU o ± OD - 4 cu cn 1 to / \ k ©, ) / \kCL c p I E ow 2 3 I E 2 Q o / § a)§ wkk § 2 u in < I I 2 u = \ r1i r .�\�N .C4 � : � % \ \ / / _§ — ai « c u $ m 2 a O ( / � : % \ � § 0 / o< f § § J / CL x 0 LU / Ln 0 ? } Q J Q W 0 W LL C f6 d co CjO O O_ m Zr O o O a O (v U n 0 UD O Ln N O Z O Y C O u Cm C 0 AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d) Introduction Federal Way's Annual Action Plan provides descriptions of proposals of how funds will be prioritized to achieve goals identified in the Consolidated Plan. Projects funded by the City will address the priority needs of providing assistance to prevent homelessness, ensure affordable housing and a suitable living environment. Projects and programs are selected through a competitive application process to ensure optimal quality services are provided to the community in use of the funds. # Project Name 1 Program Administration M.M.M._.... 2 Housing Repair Program 3 2020 Debt Service for Federal Way PAEC Section 108 Loan 4 Code Compliance 5 Federal Way Community Center Inclusion Program 6 Multi-Service Center Rental Assistance 7 Multi-Service Center YES Program ................ .............. 8 Orion Employment Services 9 Pediatric Interim Care Center 10 Apprenticeship & Non-traditional Employment for Women (ANEW) 11 Habitat for Humanity Seattle-King County Federal Way Repairs 2020 12 Highline College StartZone (NRSA) 13 Highline College Business Development Programs Table 20—Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs In establishing the priorities for activities to meet the needs of the City, activities are being considered which are likely to be of high impact. The City looked to its own initiatives and goals to determine how to best build on efforts already underway which could impact the economic problems affecting low-and moderate-income persons. This has led the City to develop strategies with a focus on economic revitalization activities and job creation, safety net/self-sufficiency services,and protecting/enhancing housing owned or rented by low-and moderate-income households. In order to continue services helping populations who are risk,the City allocated the maximum possible to services that have proven to be effective in the past. The City placed a significant amount of the resources into the economic development activities for job creation and allocated funding for microenterprise technical assistance; and, in order to begin working on affordable housing needs, identified funds to maintain owner-occupied housing. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 78 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) The City has chosen to place 100%of program funds toward activities which primarily benefit low-and moderate-income households and will assure that a minimum of 70%of program resources will benefit low-and moderate-income households. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 79 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information 1 Project Name Program Administration Target Area Goals Supported Needs Addressed Funding CDBG: $138,000 Description CDBG Program Planning and Administration for PY2O2O, Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number This is planning and administration and does not directly benefit and type of families families. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description 33325 8th Avenue S, Federal Way, WA 98003 Planned Activities CDBG Administration 2 Project Name Housing Repair Program Target Area Goals Supported Preserve Affordable Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding CDBG:$175,000 Description Housing repair program helping low/low mod income homeowners repair their homes to a safe condition. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number 10 households will benefit. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Recipients must be homeowners in the City of Federal Way.Specific locations will be determined. Planned Activities Housing repair for extremely low-, low-,and moderate-income homeowners. Work is primarily focused on interior health and safety issues,though roofs and ADA accessibility improvements are also considered on a case-by-case basis. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 80 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 3 project Name 2020 Debt Service for Federal Way PAEC Section 108 Loan Target Area Goals Supported Expand Economic Opportunities Needs Addressed Economic Development and Job Growth Funding CDBG:$235,217 Description Annual Debt Service on Federal Way Performing Arts and Event Center Section 108 Loan including iterest payments and one principal payment. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number 7 jobs will be created. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description 31510 20th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Census Tract#53033030006 Planned Activities Debt service on the expected Section 108 Loan for the PAEC.A portion of the annual grant will be directed to debt service for the Section 108 Loan for the full term of the loan, which will be 20 years. The annual amount for a full year of debt service is expected to be approximately $235,000 per year over the 20-year term. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 81 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 4 Project Name Code Compliance Target Area Goals Supported Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environment Needs Addressed Living Environment Funding CDBG: $76,000 Description Support code compliance related to City Zoning and codes in areas of the City that are 51%or great low-and moderate- income and are deteriorating or deteriorated. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number and type of 50 housing units. families that will benefit from the proposed activities i Location Description Census tracts and/or block groups at or above 51% low-and moderate-income and either with signs of deterioration or in a deteriorated condition. Planned Activities Code compliance. 5 Project Name ( Federal Way Community Center Inclusion Program Target Area Goals Supported Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environment Needs Addressed Living Environment Funding CDBG: $29,000 Description The Inclusion Program provides social activities and classes for developmentally disabled adults. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number and type of 300 individuals will benefit. families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description The majority of activities will be provided at the Federal Way Community Center(876 S. 333rd Street, Federal Way, WA 98003).Some activities will be provided off-site. I Planned Activities Social activities, life skills training,trips, and others. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 82 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 6 Project Name Multi-Service Center Rental Assistance Target Area Goals Supported Prevent and Address Homelessness Needs Addressed Homelessness Funding CDBG: $32,800 Description Multi-Service Center will provide rental assistance to eligible Federal Way residents in crisis. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number 40 individuals will benefit from rental assistance. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Services will be provided at the Multi-Service Center(1200 S. 336th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003). Planned Activities Individuals will receive short-term rental assistance to prevent eviction. 7 Project Name Multi-Service Center YES Program Target Area Goals Supported Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environment Needs Addressed Living Environment Funding CDBG: $12,178 Description YES helps youth and young adults ages 16-24 to obtain their GED, secure employment and continue post-secondary schooling, as appropriate,while helping them to establish and work toward careers and living wage employment. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number 20 individuals between the ages of 16 and 24 will benefit. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Services will occur at the Multi-Service Center(1200 S. 336th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003). Planned Activities Classes and training to help youth and young adults obtain their GED, secure employment, continue post-secondary schooling. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 83 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Orion Employment Services 8 Project Name Target Area Goals Supported Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environment Needs Addressed Living Environment Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Employment Services for disabled adults. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number 3 individuals will benefit from this activity. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Job training will be provided at 1590 A Street NE, Auburn, WA 98002 Planned Activities Vocational counseling and skills training to obtain employment, 9 Project Name Pediatric Interim Care Center Target Area Goals Supported Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environment Needs Addressed Living Environment Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Interim care of drug-exposed infants. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number 1 infant will benefit from this activity. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Services will be provided at 328 4th Avenue S, Kent, WA 98032 Planned Activities PICC's services include infant transportation, 24-hour medical monitoring, nursing care, physician visits, narcotic assisted withdrawal, nutritional support for feeding difficulties, and other interim-level medical support(oxygen, PICC lines, etc.) as needed. PICC's social work staff facilitates family visitation, liaises with DSHS, and follows infants for six months after discharge to assure that they continue to thrive. PICC also provides educational and outreach services to the community on the recognition and care of drug-affected infants. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 84 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 10 project Name Apprenticeship & Non-traditional Employment for Women (ANEW) Target Area Goals Supported Establish and Maintain Suitable Living Environment Needs Addressed Living Environment Funding CDBG:$8,670 Description Pre-apprenticeship training and employment services. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number 5 individuals will receive job training and employment services/case and type of families management. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Activities will be provided at Apprenticeship& Non-traditional Employment for Women (ANEW) (550 SW 7th Street, Renton, WA 98057) Planned Activities Individuals participate in one of two tracks: 1)Trades Rotation Program, a 12-week pre-apprenticeship training program with job placement and retention services for women in manufacturing and construction trades; and 2)the Career Connection Program, wrap- around employment services focusing on job placement and retention. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 85 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) r• 11 Project Name Habitat for Humanity Seattle-King County azo Federal Way Repairs 2020 Target Area Goals Supported Preserve Affordable Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding CDBG: $62,000 Description Housing repair program helping low/low mod income homeowners repair their homes to a safe condition. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number and type 4 families will benefit in 2020. of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description This activity will take place at locations to be determined within the approved NRSA. Planned Activities Housing repair for extremely low-, low-, and moderate- income homeowners. Work is primarily focused on exterior health and safety issues and ADA accessibility improvements. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 86 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 12Project Name Highline College StartZone (NRSA) Target Area Goals Supported Expand Economic Opportunities Needs Addressed Economic Development and Job Growth Funding CDBG: $30,000 Description Technical Assistance to microenterprise business owners, entrepreneurs, and start-up businesses located in the approved Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number and 18 individuals will receive technical assistance. type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Activities will be provided at Highline College (2400 S. 240th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198) and in the NRSA to the extent possible. Planned Activities Business advisors will provide one-to-one technical assistance and advising to business owners looking to start or grow their businesses as well as educational interventions that are aimed at enhancing small business, self-employment, and micro-enterprise in Federal Way. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 87 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 13 1 project Name Highline College Business Development Programs Target Area Goals Supported Expand Economic Opportunities Needs Addressed Economic Development and Job Growth Funding CDBG: $30,000 Description Technical Assistance to microenterprise business owners, entrepreneurs, and start-up businesses located in Federal Way. Target Date 12/31/2020 Estimate the number and 24 individuals will receive technical assistance. type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Activities will be provided at Highline College (2400 S. 240th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198) Planned Activities Business advisors will provide one-to-one technical assistance and advising to business owners looking to start or grow their businesses as well as educational interventions that are aimed at enhancing small business, self-employment, and micro-enterprise in Federal Way. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 88 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration)where assistance will be directed The City of Federal Way will direct assistance throughout the community as needed.This includes one geographic area identified in north Federal Way as part of the approved Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA).Two projects will be directed to the NRSA. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds North Federal Way Table 21-Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Persons and households in need exist throughout the City and resources are to be allocated as needed. The NRSA was identified for having both barriers and opportunities.The area continues to have concentrations of low-to moderate-income households and concentrations of ethnic and minority populations as well as a variety of housing problems. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 89 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k) Introduction The City of Federal Way has been and will remain involved in collaborative efforts that serve the needs of low-and moderate-income persons and households, the homeless, and those with special needs. The City participates on numerous committees, boards, and the like and works directly with agencies and organizations that provide services in order to enhance the level and quality of services in Federal Way and throughout South King County. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The City is working with other communities in South King County to establish and enhance strong networks for community development and human services delivery. This includes working with service providers, stakeholders,the faith-based community,other government agencies, and those we serve directly to identify and overcome or mitigate barriers to meeting underserved needs. There are both on-going discussions among the parties to share information about current issues, as well as longer term planning to develop strategies, build public awareness, and enhance the support of elected officials for increased resources for the underserved. The City worked with local cities to implement a Parallel Application process to the Human Services General Fund process.The Parallel Application focused on underserved, underrepresented, and underfunded communities with particular focus on organizations and programs serving communities of color, immigrants, and/or refugees. For 2017-2018,the City funded five programs for a total of$14,500 per year and has seen great success and will be providing$15,000 to three programs for both 2019 and 2020. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The City operates the Home Repair Program, which is funded by CDBG and serves low- and moderate- income homeowners in Federal Way. The program provides emergency and standard repair and renovation services that help families remain in their homes. The program is a means of retaining and enhancing affordable housing and serves to support aging in place, as well as strengthening the neighborhoods in which the homes are located.The program does not specifically target households with elderly individuals, but does serve primarily older adults and often incorporates renovations that assist individuals in staying in their home longer with additions such as ramps, bathroom upgrades including grab bars and accessible showers, and so on. The City of Federal Way also joined the newly established South King County Housing and Homelessness Partnership (SKHHP) in collaboration with other cities in south King County and King County. SKHHP will Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 90 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) focus on assisting the region in in meeting affordable housing and homeless needs. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards The City of Federal Way works to reduce lead-based paint hazards by complying with and requiring subrecipients to comply with the Lead-Based Paint requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 35.This includes meeting the requirements for notification, identification, and stabilization of deteriorated paint; identification and control of lead-based paint hazards; and identification and abatement of lead- based paint hazards.The Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home pamphlet developed by the EPA, HUD, and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is also distributed. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families Actions to reduce the number of poverty level families include funding small business and micro- enterprise training and technical assistance. Additionally, actions include maintaining and enhancing relationships with school-based mentoring programs that lead to increased graduation and college acceptance and outreach to increase opportunities for low-income residents to obtain livable wage jobs. Actions planned to develop institutional structure In 2020,the Community Services Division will: • Update the Division website to include pertinent information for community-based organizations for planning and program implementation purposes, and for individuals seeking resources for community development. Continue to advocate for additional resources for a coordinated approach to community development and planning to address poverty issues, affordable housing,job creation, and community revitalization initiatives. • Continue to participate in collaborative efforts with other funders, private sector groups, and agency coalitions such as the Continuum of Care. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The City of Federal Way has regularly fostered relationships between these entities and will continue to develop and participate in these collaborations, including the South King Council of Human Services, South King County Housing Development Group,the King County Housing Development Consortium, and South King Housing and Homelessness Partnership (SKHHP).As part of the SKHHP work group,the City of Federal Way and other local cities work with agencies to develop the system and advocate for Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 91 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) coordination between housing and social service agencies. Discussion The expressed goal of the CDBG Program is to reduce the number of people living in poverty. The City gives funding priority to programs that, in addition to complying with federal regulations, address a- priority outlined in the Consolidated Plan, and are consistent with all of the goals and objectives identified. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 92 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.4201F 91.220(1)(1,2,4) Introduction As a member of the King County HOME Consortium,the City of Federal Way will engage in housing activities, collaborations, and partnerships to enhance opportunities for equitable development and the creation/preservation of affordable housing.The Consortium will plan for and support fair housing strategies and initiatives designed to affirmatively further fair housing choice and to increase access to housing and housing programs. We value working together collectively to continue the work to develop a cohesive and coordinated homeless system that is grounded in the principle of Housing First and fosters shared outcomes.We are not a one size fits all system and as such, we invest in projects that ensure that homeless households from all sub-populations: • are treated with dignity and respect; • are returned to permanent housing as quickly as possible; • receive strength-based services that emphasize recovery, as needed; • are supported to graduate from temporary homeless housing as rapidly as possible and from permanent supportive housing as soon as they are ready; • receive only what they need to return to housing quickly and to be as self-reliant as possible. To establish and maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low-and moderate-income people, our investments across the Consortium in low-income communities, and for the benefit of low-income people, help to ensure equitable opportunities for good health, happiness, safety, self-reliance,and connection to community.Specific strategies include: 1) improve the ability of health and human services agencies to serve our low-and moderate-income residents safely and effectively; 2) improve the living environment in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods and communities; and 3) expand economic opportunities for low-to moderate-income residents of the Consortium. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table.The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 93 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) 1.The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2.The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3.The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4.The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5.The amount of income from float-funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 0 Other CDBG Requirements 1.The amount of urgent need activities 0 2.The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income.Overall Benefit-A consecutive period of one,two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70%of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00% Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 94 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) Appendix - Alternate/Local Data Sources 1 Data Source Name 11-15 ACS Data, Selected Economic Characteristics List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. US Census Bureau Provide a brief summary of the data set. 2015 American Community Survey Data; DP03:Selected Economic Characteristics What was the purpose for developing this data set? I The dataset was already developed;the City is using this in place of the pre-populated IDIS data as there were errors in the data in IDIS. Provide the year(and optionally month,or month and day)for when the data was collected. 2015 Briefly describe the methodology for the data collection. Describe the total population from which the sample was taken. Describe the demographics of the respondents or characteristics of the unit of measure,and the number of respondents or units surveyed. Consolidated Plan FEDERAL WAY 95 OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.06/30/2018) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#: 6b ............... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice? COMMITTEE: Parks,Recreation,Human Services, &Public Safety MEETING DATE: 10/8/2019 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager DEPT: CD Joseph Adrian, CDBG/Human Services Coordinator Attachments: Staff Report 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Options Considered: 1. Approve the 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. 2. Do not approve the 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and give staff direction. MAYOR'S RF.C5ZYT END., TION: 1 MAYOR APPR �i �* DIRECTOR APPROVAL: 2� 11 << •il 4l][l,,11C 3� COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice to the October 15, 2019 agenda for approval. kl2mmittee Chair Committee Member Co e Member PROPO D COUNCIL MOTION: `I move approval of 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: City Council Members VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: 2019 King County Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice Financial Impacts: There is no cost for the 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. If projects are selected in response,they may be funded with Community Development Block Grant funding or other appropriate funding sources selected when projects move forward. Background Information: The federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 makes it unlawful to discriminate in any aspect related to the sale,rental, or financing of dwelling because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. All entitlement communities that receive funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are required to develop an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice(AI) as part of the consolidated planning process. As part of the King County Consortium, the City of Federal Way participates under the King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. The Al seeks to understand the barriers to fair housing choice as identified by community and stakeholder input, data, and policy analysis. This AI will guide policy and funding decisions to end discrimination and address historic patterns of segregation. Key findings in the 2019 King County Al include: • King County has become significantly more diverse over recent decades. • Jurisdictions in King County can be categorized within three racial compositions: areas that are diverse, predominantly White and Asian, and predominantly White. • South Seattle and Southwest King County contain the most diverse areas of King County and face the greatest barriers in access to opportunity. • Economic segregation is a major contributing factor to segregation patterns throughout King County and protected class status is frequently correlated with lower incomes. Rev.7/18 • Housing prices have increased dramatically in the last ten years, displacing lower- income communities of color and immigrants. • Field-testing conducted across jurisdictions in King County found evidence of individual-level housing discrimination in about half of all tests. • Blacks are half as likely as Whites to apply for a home loan, and twice as likely to be denied. Protected Classes Federal State of Washington Kin Coun Race Sexual Orientation Age Color Gender Identity Ancestry National Origin Creed Religion Marital Status Sex Veteran/Military Status Disability Use of Service or Assistive Familial Status Animal Source of Income Fair Housing Testing Fair housing testing is a national best practice to understanding the nature and extent of individual-level housing discrimination in a given community. In 2018, the King County Consortium and the Cities of Auburn, Bellevue, Burien, Federal Way, Kent, and Renton jointly funded testing through the Fair Housing Center of Washington(FHCW). The FHCW conducted 66 differential treatment tests and 16 policy checks in jurisdictions across King County from January to May 31, 2019. Differential treatment tests are two- part, in which a member of a protected class and a control tester apply for the same housing. Policy tests ask housing providers direct questions about their policies, such as accommodation for a disability or whether they rent to families with children. The FHCW tested property management companies, not individual landlords. The final report from the FHCW found evidence of discrimination in 39 out of 82 total tests. These results are troubling and indicate that protected classes continue to face individual-level discrimination. Evidence of discrimination was found at roughly the same rate (around half) for each protected class and in most jurisdictions, with the exception of the source of income policy checks, which found a violation in four out of twelve tests. More testing is required to gain a better understanding of which groups are most at risk of discrimination. Fair Housing Goals The draft 2019 Al recommends the following Fair Housing Goals: 1. Invest in programs that provide fair housing education, enforcement, and testing. 2. Engage underrepresented communities on an ongoing basis to better understand barriers and increase access to opportunity. 3. Provide more housing for vulnerable populations. Rev.7/18 4. Provide more housing choices for households with large families. 5. Support efforts to increase housing stability. 6. Preserve and increase affordable housing in communities at high risk of displacement. 7. Review zoning laws to increase housing options and supply in urban areas. 8. Work with communities to guide investments in historically underserved communities. 9. Support the Affordable Housing Committee's efforts to promote fair housing. 10. Report annually on Fair Housing Goals and progress. The City of Federal Way may choose to select certain goals to work on throughout the Consolidated Plan period of 2020-2024. The goals will address City of Federal Way specific conditions. For instance, the City already supports and funds projects focused on increasing housing stability and preserving affordability. Additional strategies may be added in future annual action plans. Rev.7/18 Attachment A 2019 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY Attachment A Table of Contents Introduction and Executive Summary..............................................................................3 Community Participation Process ....................................................................................4 Assessment of Past Fair Housing Goals....................................................................... 19 FairHousing Analysis....................................................................................................26 DemographicTrend Summary...................................................................................27 Segregation and Integration in King County...............................................................30 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs)................................41 Disproportionate Housing Needs ..................................................................................43 Disparities in Access to Opportunity..............................................................................49 Education................................................................................................................... 50 Employment...............................................................................................................55 Transportation............................................................................... ....................57 EnvironmentalHealth................................................................................................ 60 Conclusion - Disparities in Access to Opportunity......................................................66 Publicly Supported Housing Analysis............................................................................67 Disability and Access Analysis......................................................................•----...........71 Fair Housing Discrimination Data Analysis....................................................................74 FairHousing Goals............................................................................... ...................76 Conclusionand Next Steps.....................................:.....................................................77 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Attachment A Attachment A INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Everyone deserves fair access to housing. Discrimination and segregation are deeply engrained in the history of the United States, including King County. Access to housing was historically a key tool to perpetuate segregation, and will be critical for its undoing. The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 banned discrimination against certain protected classes, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's) implementation of the act requires all local governments to affirmatively further fair housing. This means King County must take meaningful actions to combat discrimination, overcome historic patterns of segregation, and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity. Protected Classes in King County Federal State of Washington f King Count Race Sexual Orientation Age Color Gender Identity Ancestry National Origin Creed Religion Marital Status Sex Veteran/Military Status Disability Use of Service or Assistive Familial Status Animal Source of Income This Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Analysis of Impediments) seeks to understand the barriers to fair housing choice and will guide policy and funding decisions to end discrimination and overcome historic patterns of segregation in King County. This analysis is written in the context of King County's Equity and Social Justice Strategic Plan', which provides a lens through which all critical government decisions are made. The Strategic Plan creates a framework to analyze how to engage historically underserved communities in examining current conditions and defining equitable solutions. ' 'It t�rs:i/�Gua.Kinr c.c�urrY°pv,''d?u: ,il bt -y/nnrp-nirrr��rs officeltinuity social i aiicel?G1iaD�l L5J SP FUU nCi King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 1 Attachment A This analysis is also written in the context of the Regional Affordable Housing Task Force's Five-Year Action Plan and Final Report2 and the Affordable Housing Committee. This analysis may inform efforts King County and the Affordable Housing Committee will take to develop model ordinances or provide technical assistance to partner jurisdictions. The Five-Year Action Plan includes strategies that this analysis partially addresses: • Goal 4, Strategy A: Propose and support legislation and statewide policies related to tenant protection to ease implementation and provide consistency for landlords: o Prohibit discrimination in housing against tenants and potential tenants with arrest records, conviction records, or criminal history • Goal 4, Strategy B: Strive to more widely adopt model, expanded tenant protection ordinances countywide and provide implementation support for: o Prohibiting discrimination in housing against tenants and potential tenants with arrest records, conviction records, or criminal history • Goal 5, Strategy B: Increase investments in communities of color and low-income communities by developing programs and policies that serve individuals and families at risk of displacement o Expand requirements to affirmatively market housing programs and enhance work to align affordable housing strategies with federal requirements to affirmatively further fair housing. This analysis is conducted on behalf of the King County Consortium, which includes all of King County with the exception of the Cities of Seattle and Milton. While this analysis includes the City of Seattle, particularly for the analysis of shifting demographics and segregation throughout King County, it does not represent the City of Seattle nor reflect all of its efforts to affirmatively further fair housing. The City of Seattle and Seattle Housing Authority conducted its own Assessment of Fair Housing in 2017, which you can read here.' This analysis is primarily based on the structure of HUD's 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing Local Government Assessment Tool and the data from the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Too14 provided by HUD. More current and supplemental data sources are included when appropriate, and the structure has been modified to improve readability. Z https:f/kincounty.�ov/-/media/,niter.tiVeS/affaroan'Iehousing/doeumenis/re[iort/RAHRepo.tPrirtFileupdated7 17-19.ashx?la=en 3 http://wvA,y.5E'r.[l1F�'ov/DL)cUi?lZrits/Dcnartire:itb/f-lumaiiServ;ces/CDBG/2017%20AFH%2OFinal 425.17V2.pdf a https:,�le�i5.h7ur:l.�;rn_I�ir'I-a/ King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 2 Attachment A Executive Summary This report finds that systemic segregation, disproportionate housing needs, and individual-level discrimination are present and ongoing in King County. Key findings include: King County has become significantly more diverse over recent decades. • Jurisdictions in King County can be categorized within three racial compositions: areas that are diverse, predominantly White and Asian, and predominantly White. • South Seattle and Southwest King County contain the most diverse areas of King County and face the greatest barriers in access to opportunity. Economic segregation is a major factor to segregation patterns throughout King County and protected class status is frequently correlated with lower incomes. ® Housing prices have increased dramatically in the last ten years, displacing lower- income communities of color and immigrants. ® Field-testing conducted across jurisdictions in King County found evidence of individual-level housing discrimination in about half of all tests. Blacks are half as likely as Whites to apply for a home loan and twice as likely to be denied. This report proposes an initial set of goals: 1. Invest in programs that provide fair housing education, enforcement, and testing. 2. Engage underrepresented communities on an ongoing basis to better understand barriers and increase access to opportunity. 3. Provide more housing for vulnerable populations. 4. Provide more housing choices for people with large families. 5. Support efforts to increase housing stability. 6. Preserve and increase affordable housing in communities at high risk of displacement. 7. Review zoning laws to increase housing options and supply in urban areas. 8. Work with communities to guide investments in historically underserved communities. 9. Support the Affordable Housing Committee's efforts to promote fair housing. 10.Report annually on Fair Housing Goals and progress. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 3 Attachment A CO MUMTY PARTICIPATION PROCESS King County staff solicited input on community needs, priorities, and on the draft Analysis of Impediments from partner organizations, local jurisdictions, and the general public. Public outreach and engagement activities were designed to reduce barriers to participation and engage stakeholders and community groups who have been underrepresented in the past. King County staff partnered with local jurisdictions to help reach more communities, and hosted meetings in public places that might be more broadly attended. Information on the Analysis of Impediments, the notice of the public meetings and survey were widely distributed through targeted outreach with local partners. The public review draft was available for public review and comment from June 14-July 26, 2019. The meeting notices and the survey tool were available to members of the public in English, Somali, Spanish, and Vietnamese from June 25-July 26, 2019. The Joint Recommendations Committee, which oversees the funding decisions of the King County Consortium, reviewed and approved this report at a special meeting on July 12, 2019. In effect, this means that this Analysis of Impediments has been adopted by all of the cities in King County, except the Cities of Seattle and Milton. The King County Department of Community and Human Services will submit this report to the King County Council by September, which will provide an additional forum for public comment. Stakeholders King County staff invited members of the following organizations to participate in one- on-one interviews to provide additional feedback. Staff also shared the public meetings notice with the following organizations and encouraged them to distribute it through their networks. Housing Providers/Policy Advocates • Housing Development Consortium of Seattle-King County • Housing Justice Project • King County Housing Authority • Puget Sound Sage • Renton Housing Authority • Tenant's Union (WA State and City of Kent) • WA Multifamily Housing Association • WA Realtors Nonprofit/Community Based Organizations • African Community Housing and Development • Alliance of People with disAbilities • Asian Pacific Islander Americans for Civic Engagement (APACE) King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 4 Attachment A Asian Counseling and Referral Services • Centro De La Raza • Refugee Women's Alliance (ReWA) • Somali Community: Living Well Kent • Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence(WSCADV) ® White Center CDA Regional Partners • Columbia Legal Services • Futurewise • Puget Sound Sage • Skyway Solutions • University of Washington: Evans School of Public Policy & Governance King County staff conducted interviews with representatives from the following organizations: • Alliance for People with disAbilities • Asian Counseling and Referral Services • Columbia Legal Services • University of Washington: Evans School of Public Policy & Governance • King County Housing Authority • Puget Sound SAGE • Refugee Women's Alliance • Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION r� xoCvcLOusincPMcr: v�S^„ L DF�I11{' i'f lll' f—'OIumL,l —,c'i SE'S R,E NTO u. skyway OUS '41ri utw AUTHORITYI........ �...: .., .,. „,. R. alb► King County a�t . '.�MflIS1UNG1DMsrITFCCKUTW►+ 600•.ero�+.. ;:-:�y,�a natFsn[v oL[t�t • CFH CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS , AC[ti 1 L liEY'r�! • • • — DOING THE HerPE vl.ih nrr.Abiiities o.`no 11-$1 1— MOST C OOU I { 'C )OL OF PUBLIC PQ1.1jjj6jjj66" 1=AIR HOUSING King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 5 Attachment A Community Meetings For the General Public Public Drop-In Forums Three public open houses (one in each sub-region) gave a chance for residents to provide feedback on the draft Analysis of Impediments and share their concerns and perspectives with King County staff. These meetings followed the federal requirements for providing public notice, providing notice in the Seattle Times newspapers, posting on the King County website, posting notice at the meeting site and providing direct notification to stakeholders 14 calendar days prior to the first community meeting. These meetings took place at the following times and locations: • East— Bellevue, 6/15, Crossroads Mall, 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. North — Shoreline, 6/22, Shoreline Library, 10:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. ® South —Tukwila, 6/29, Tukwila Library, 10:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. These community forums were held in mixed—income and low-income locations around King County that are walkable, accessible by public transit, and had free parking. The venues included areas that are frequented by community members of all economic backgrounds, often in areas with subsidized and affordable housing options. These public meetings were held in publicly accessible locations, without architectural barriers which would preclude the attendance of people who have a disability. The community meeting held at the Crossroads Mall was the best attended, as the location had the most foot traffic, and was a good location to talk to people passing by the posted information. Additional Meetings King County co-hosted two community meetings jointly, one with the City of Auburn and another with the City of Federal Way. An additional stakeholder meeting was scheduled to provide an opportunity to discuss this work and get feedback during work hours. Staff from the Downtown Emergency Services Center, Housing Development Consortium, and Congregations for the Homeless attended this meeting. King County staff also briefed the City of Renton Human Services Commission on this process, key findings, and recommendations. Online Survey King County staff also distributed an online survey to collect information regarding individuals' personal experiences of barriers to accessing housing. The survey was translated into Spanish, Vietnamese, and Somali to increase accessibility. By the end of the comment period, 46 participants submitted responses and comments through the survey. Survey Themes: King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 6 Attachment A • Rental Market: o Lack of affordable housing for low-income/fixed-income individuals o Instability of constantly moving due to: ■ Annual rent increases that make an area unaffordable ■ Buildings being renovated and displacing residents o Living with multiple roommates in crowded conditions to afford the area o Community members settling for sub-quality rental housing in order to manage affordability o Moved out of homelessness into a rental unit • Housing ownership market is too expensive and unattainable: o Older housing options are the only options in lower price ranges o Newer housing is larger and starts in the $800K range o Prices prevent younger families from moving in, the elderly from staying in their homes and the new graduates need to return to live at home o Newer housing being built does not incorporate concern for aesthetic or functional neighborhoods or communities; quantity over quality is being valued o Frustrated by a lack of market options/configurations; need more multi- family properties • Need more education about how to report housing discrimination, and what tenant rights are when facing fair housing discrimination • Need more low-barrier, affordable housing options • Need to protect mobile home parks from development, enabling low-income residents to remain (see work Kenmore is doing) Summary of Feedback Key Themes Highlighted from Public Meetings and Stakeholder Interviews: • Fair Housing Enforcement needs work, as the current system relies on the injured party to report the discrimination (racism, classism, ableism etc.) • Certain protected classes (i.e. individuals living with a disability, immigrants with limited English proficiency) experience inherent barriers to accessing housing o Need more accessible units for people with disabilities, and policies to ensure units are actually accessible or modified to be accessible o Need for more translated materials (forms, websites) and available interpreters to help immigrants/refugees access information and apply for housing • The impacts of displacement are being felt across the county: o Available housing is pricing out low-income individuals o Evictions are disproportionately impacting women of color o Cost of housing restricts geographical choice, forces residents to relocate o Number of people experiencing homelessness continue to increase King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 7 Attachment A Immigrant and refugee communities are afraid of government/public entities/organizations • Credit scores and social security numbers are being used as neutral tools to discriminate against potential tenants Recommended Actions Identified by Public Stakeholders: • Need more accessible, affordable housing and larger capacity units across King County • Need to further educate landlords/property managers/housing providers on working with tenants with disabilities, with domestic violence survivors, and with tenants with criminal records. • Need a centralized housing database that provides a reference list of available housing programs, resources and available units. The following chart summarizes the feedback received for each public meeting and interview. Feedback has also been incorporated throughout this analysis since the public review draft was first posted on June 14, 2019. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 8 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Public Affordable The Regional Affordable Housing Se-e r,leetlnn SurnriorV None Meeting Housing Task Force Kick-Off meeting on experts, July 14,2017 at the Renton htL"D5.//VVVV%A1.krCO U 11 1�1 goy,iinit:a-tmis aff stakeholder Community Center included a cr dablehousing/rneetings.aspx s data presentation on housing affordability and small and large group discussions.Approximately 70 individuals attended Public Communiti The January 30,2018 Regional See meeting sumrlary None Meeting es of Color Affordable Housing Task Force met at the New Holly Community https://www.kir,icu,unlV. .,Gv/inili.m6ves/atr Broad Center(in New Holly ordabVehousin /n.e yins.as�;x Community neighborhood operated by the Seattle Housing Authority)for open public testimony on the public's experiences of and perspective on housing affordability.50 members of the _ public provided testimony. Y e e Public Individuals The Januar 22 2018 One Table 5�r rneetin>;sUlmmary None Meeting with lived Community Action Work Group experiences meeting brought elected officials, lett 7_,: /www.kingcounty-sov/depts/comm of service providers to discuss the 0111ty-IlLflnan- homelessne root causes of homelessness and services/i,(- ,,using/services/homeless-ss to develop a community housing/one-Lable.aspx approach to homelessness and Elected affordability. Leaders Business Community Service Providers Broad Community King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 9 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of j Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Individuals The April 4,2018 One Table Sc,e meet n ;urnmaiG_ None with lived Community Action Work Group experiences meeting brought together elected I ttrs.l/WWW.krnr,LLnt,tlti,,. py,ideJtS/comm of officials,service providers to unity-human- homelessne discuss the root causes of se:.ICr' ,17cus,i L serv,ces/homeless- ss homelessness h�usi� ❑ne t�t i .,,3 �x: Elected Leaders Business Community Service Providers Broad Community Individuals The August 3,2018 One Table See meeting summa)-y None with lived Community Action Work Group experiences meeting brought elected officials, https.-//Www.kingcounly.gov/depts/comm of service providers to discuss the unity-human- homelessne root causes of homelessness. �,ervir.es/hoLising/services/homeless- ss housing- one-tabl(�.aspx Elected Leaders Business Community Service Providers Broad Community King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 10 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Public Broad The April 19,2018 Regional see meE €inc sLjnmnary None Meeting Community Affordable Housing Task Force Meeting at Kenmore City Hall was ; tt ps//www.F,,ii,gcounty.gov/initiatives/aff organized with small group cfrdablehousinla./meetings.aspx discussions around a specific issue of affordable housing,with small groups reporting out to the whole.Approximately 50 people participated. Public Broad On September 5,2018 at Sec rneetingsummary None Meeting Community Shoreline Community College,the Regional Affordable Housing Task I'rttps: �ryJww.kin cnunty• o�/initiatives/aff Force presented a draft Action o r d a b I&huusin&Lj:f-_ln�s.aspx Plan and facilitated discussion around prioritizing goals. Public Broad On September 8,2018 at the See rnee[:r_,sun-tmary None Meeting Community South Bellevue Community Center,the Regional Affordable ht[ps-tl/ti.vww.k_in_gcounty.gov/initiatives/aff Housing Task Force presented a ordablehousirir;/iiieettngs.aspx draft Action Plan and facilitated discussion around prioritizing goals. i Public Broad On September 11,2018 at the i See me'tin None Meeting Community Auburn Community Center,the Regional Affordable Housing Task hrLps://www.kite ,cc•,,r)ty.,E0Vlrnit;atives(aff Force presented a draft Action ordablehousing/me_Lt ngsaspx Plan and facilitated discussion around prioritizing goals. Online Broad The Regional Affordable Housing See public comments here None Comment Community Task Force website hosted a Tool public comment tool that allowed htLps.//www.lon Li Lnty g jy/jnitiativesfaff residents to share what ordablehousinp.r,spx neighborhood they live in (optionally),their experiences, and any other perspectives or solutions to address housing affordability. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 11 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach s Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Public Community On April 1,2019 King County staff People expressed a desire to see more None Meeting Meeting in participated in a community affordable housing,fewer barriers to Auburn meeting organized by City of obtaining housing including:tenant Auburn to gather input for their screening,selective micro-targeting CDBG program and county-wide through social media,discrimination housing and fair housing needs. against domestic violence survivors, rental application fees.Also mentioned was single family zoning as exclusionary and limiting the housing supply.Other supply constraining factors mentioned were permitting process and regulations. Public Broad On June 15, 2019 King County Members of the public expressed a need None Meeting Community staff organized a community for more affordable housing options for (Bellevue) drop-in opportunity in Bellevue at renters and home buyers.They shared Crossroads Mall for community concerns of their community becoming members to discuss county-wide unaffordable.Shared concerns that housing needs and fair housing employees need to travel further from needs,as well as provide public work to find housing. Lack of affordable comment on the Consolidated housing is impacting efforts to help people Plan and Analysis for out of homelessness, means people are on Impediments. waitlists longer. Fair housing laws can have unintended consequences,and it can be complicated for realtors to implement. Community needs:workforce housing, ADUs,subsidies that provide both housing and cost of living assistance. Public Broad On June 22,2019 King County Members of the public shared the fear None Meeting Community staff organized a community immigrant communities are feeling to join (Shoreline/ drop-in opportunity at the public meetings,and a need for more Lake Forest Shoreline Library for community outreach to immigrant communities. Park) members to discuss county-wide Concerned about availability of housing housing needs and fair housing stock, and impact of tech companies needs,as well as provide public expanding campuses.Community needs comment on the Consolidated more: rental assistance to help keep Plan and Analysis for housing,low-income apartment stock, Impediments. resources on what to do when you are experiencing discrimination and better responsiveness to reported discrimination. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 12 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Public Broad On June 29,2019 King County Members of the public shared their None Meeting Community staff organized a community concern regarding impact of evictions,and (Tukwila) drop-in opportunity at the how it is being misused.Concerned about Tukwila Library for community the growing number of homeless women members to discuss county-wide and homeless vets.Additionally, how housing needs and fair housing affordability is impacting ability to stay in needs,as well as provide public their preferred neighborhoods.Community comment on the Consolidated needs more:help with planning around Plan and Analysis for credit scores,education,financial planning, Impediments. and new,accessible homes at affordable prices. Stakehold Partners/St On July 9,2019 King County staff Partners shared their concern that there None er akeholders organized a community drop-in are not adequate resources for behavioral Meeting opportunity for partners and health needs,aging in place,or access to stakeholders to discuss county- adult care homes.Additional concerns wide housing needs and fair included unhealthy housing. Partners housing needs,as well as provide shared that the county needs more long- public comment on the term medical care, more education for Consolidated Plan and Analysis landlords,long-term subsidized housing, for Impediments. private landlord/rental repair,and more fair housing testing and enforcement Public Joint On July 12,2019 King County staff Joint Recommendations Committee(JRC) None Meeting Recommen organized a special meeting of held a special meeting and heard a dations the Joint Recommendations presentation on the Consolidated Plan and Committee Committee(JRC)to review and Analysis for Impediments. &Members approve the Consolidated Plan of the and Analysis of Impediments to Members of the public shared concern for Public Fair Housing the displacement of immigrants/refugees from their neighborhoods of choice,and how that type of displacement has a distinct ripple effect for both the community member that is forced to move, and the community left behind. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 13 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance 1. comments received comments not accepted and reasons Stakehold Alliance of Interviewed leadership at Alliance -Fair housing barriers: people who are None er People with of People with disAbilities impacted need extra support; housing Interview disAbilities access is unaffordable and inaccessible- Accessible units rented on first serve basis, not held for tenants with accessibility needs;increases the wait for units and rigorous search needed for those tenants -Alliance of People with disAbilities acts as a system navigator to help people access services;work with anyone who states they have a disability -People with disabilities are missing/not reflected by current reports on homelessness,even though they continue to represent a growing part of the homeless population -Distinction between ADA accessible and accessible for specific individual;some more work is needed on educating housing providers on tenants' rights to have a unit modified to be accessible for them -Need more accessible units and subsidized housing,with range of options to customize for tenants with disabilities -Need one stop housing database with all currently available housing and info on housing programs -Need voice at the table in these processes; there is a problem with the process -Need more funding for accessibility work, specifically advocating for tenants with disabilities and educating housing providers -Need more housing to be designed and built in a more broadly accessible King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 14 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Stakehold King County Interviewed leadership and staff -Fair housing barriers: market availability None er Housing at KCHA f and geographic choice present barriers to Interview Authority fair housing -Low-income individuals are being priced out;qualifying for these benefits gets you on the list but not immediate access to benefits; not enough resources to help everyone in need -KCHA working with City of Seattle on Creating Moves to Opportunity Pilot to improve outcomes of children by evaluation strategies that support Housing Choice Vouchers in moving to higher opportunity neighborhoods -KCHA increasing landlord engagement work; build and maintain relationships with local landlords to educate them about HCVs -Harder for housing authorities to work with undocumented family members; need to disclose all members of household living in residence -Increase in intakes of tenants coming directly out of homelessness(40-50%); demand for Section 8 vouchers is also increasing -Growing urgency and need for housing resources overall -Need more multifamily housing, affordable home ownership and concessionary sales prices King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 15 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Stakehol Washingto Interviewed staff member at -Fair housing barriers: Survivors of DV None der n State WSCADV cannot be denied housing on the basis Interview Coalition of DV history, but it does happen in Against practice(both by landlords and housing Domestic authorities) Violence -Lack of understanding on how to work (WSCADV with survivors of domestic violence -Need: improved education for housing providers on how to work with survivors and what a tenant's rights are for survivors accessing safe housing or vacating housing to be safe(i.e. changing locks, breaking a lease without repercussions, requesting new housing location) -Need: navigation for survivors help to get safe and stable housing; eviction reform and tenant screening; process of housing applications and timelines can often be the barrier Stakehol Puget Interviewed staff at Puget -Puget Sound Sage advocates for None der Sound Sound Sage investments and policies at the state Interview Sage level that seek to protect tenants and promote equitable development, and there has been significant movement in these areas in recent years -Fair housing barriers include rising house costs, restricted land use(single family housing), and evictions rising, which increases displacement, real estate market and cost of housing -Equitable Development Initiative a good example of funding to support community initiated projects in high-risk displacement neighborhoods; community engaged in solution -Need to strengthen affordable housing, use more affirmative marketing and referential strategies King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 16 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted _ and reasons Stakehol Asian Interviewed staff at ACRS -Fair housing barriers: distrust in None. der Counselin institutions, availability of interpreters Interview g and and availability of materials and forms Referral printed in multiples languages for Services clients to access (ACRS) -ACRS: assists clients finding housing and navigating services, but can take more time and resources due to language barriers; often end up filling out forms with clients. These barriers cause delays, as clients cannot access the information themselves, and ACRS has,limited resources to meet the need. -CEA is working well, providing multiple resources in community to determine needs. Housing First model has had a positive impact as well. -Need: more translated materials and more interpreters available at housing provider offices to assist with housing process, forms etc. Stakehol Columbia Interviewed staff at CLS -Fair housing barriers: None. der Legal racism/unacknowledged racism, Interview Services affordability(credit score as a "neutral (CLS) test" has a disproportionate impact, enforcement model falls on victim to report discrimination, type of housing stock and lack of units -Columbia Legal Services:work with clients with criminal records on access to housing (leaving jail, homelessness, accessibility of shelters, reasonable accommodation, and undocumented residents). -Need: education on many forms of housing discrimination that exist(ex. SSN is not needed on all the forms it is requested but can have a barrier impact); increasing access for tenants with disabilities (accommodation vs. modification). King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 17 Attachment A Citizen Participation Outreach Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments received comments not accepted and reasons Stakehol University Interviewed Evans School -Fair housing barriers: discrimination None. der of professor without enforcement, use of other Interview Washingto policies for discrimination by proxy, Ban n, Evans the Box had unintended consequences School of -Need more education around what fair Public housing is, and enforcement for parties Policy and who are violating it Governanc e King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 18 U ,V U -0 U:3 c ami C c > N 0 0 Y CU co o in 0 _c 0 0 0 (n � CU o N ca N U U cn CU cn o ai cn >, O - C U L CU p U O V L6 C > C6 C a) T- W a) ca �- U a) � � 7 c N 0) • • cn O C 0 —�' n (n c6 c rn a? a) `� c / 0 m N o C p a) > cu U a) •O E c � p L (n U Q L C C m i O) M to T a) � (6 LO cu .- � cn O) cu p E O aL cn c uj > O (6 CU C (Q cnn C a) O cn !EE cn cu 0 z Q 0) a) a) cn W cB M 3 oo 4- a) o o c '� 0 0 �> U c a) u) ate) E w c o a) o ° �D (1) CU 4- CU � � c •cp �, aa) cmn O) c c p cn -� aa) U O = = ca F E a) C a) o a) c� U .� O 0) u.) O •o Fn 0) c = I— c O � c •L 0) 0 Q a) v O E N H YU � U � � 2 Y v O n a) O 2 0 E L E a) > u LL = O c0 3 L �_ 't O O O p O O O O -` E w G Uo C- -C � ca a) c c c LL o 'm cu N LL Q a) O a) (B O © o L cn i in 2 p a) N a) N @ ii a) c a 0 Ucu 3 L L L v co M � -0 7 L � CD Z E 0 ''finn ai L— o W O (Cl)nn v L 0) a) cn N N cu ° o 0 in U m Cl) � c � �coN U � c O :3 a W 0 � - o -0 42- O a) �� CU - o p p Uo 0 o (nUQ � a U to Q Y O a) c6 c a a) Q 0) 0) — c C —_ c' � 0) 0) Q C cn o �• N p > cB -Fn °C o Q ++ 0 cn 0uj N .L C .L CU vi CU 0 N C N (B V (Q cn 0 In C O (D (D o O L L 0 O 0 a) (0 ) O OO_ -C O U 4- E 0 4-- 5 n o O - O O p U a) m L W � C a) a`) U o 0 _0 0) > C' U (6 'cn a) (4 ui C 0 0C o0 � cn to O = c6 Uj c6 n L F cB '(B .O C 0 -0 (n C L �, ao O) > LL C O a) (0 O_ _ NI fn U) (a C OO U a) 4) cn o c C 0) E CD L) �u CD m O — ate) 0 vi L a) 0 -O 0) C 0) C L7 U 2 _ C 0 Q ' a) = L L 0 O- U �i C � U U J 0 a) U : ❑ _o m L O) cn CO M N j _ C (n m .T 0 ul C C ❑ O _ _ �_ �_ O C 0 C C .�' t OJ OD CO U `� U O 0 00 0 u L 0 C o ?n -� LL $ U c C 0) 0) fQ (nn �• C « C .0 C U) L 0 m C rn C .V co E C (cn B (II C Fu m Q O (6 _U I M .� a .> a O U CL L- 0) � b a) L "O 0 Q" o a > f^ - 0 O a L O Q O U C O � V L p a) to C C Q �_ O- O "O O O 0 L 0 0 fn U > yOr (0 2� 0) 0) > y +r -0 _O a E E > fnO (6 0 0 0 a) a) _ 7 U r iii u0 co CD Y § 2 E D . 7 ® D Iff 2 2 @ 2 / E � 2 E @ E o Q @ �, LO � a) a 2 \ 7 a � 7 2 2 / _ @ E e / 9 / o ? k E E .2 k k0 a)) k c = o m U o / o g E E 2 E k -j n CL m o R = cn = f Q 13 CL M CU Q) 0) k / � 2 Co Z3 - m m \ m R � \ $ cu § � Q 2 o @ 2 '\ - ƒ o - .> R (n 2 2 0 - m 0) @ $ - QaFn 0) -r- :E - R oa .g \ ,7 � k P —§ \ E R: k § § § ƒ _ � � 0) o ° % \ § 7 ¢ m -e a 3 2 @ ° 7 2m _/ \ -,o m \ = E D 2 \j U) -0 cu k 0 2 > / m n o CU 0 & 2 % k k 2 § / § 2 D § \ § . \ _§ 2 u � § c : 2 = E % 2 k / % § 0 E 0 / = o — ° $ c \ & @ $ 7 £_ o \ / _ @ E E a § £ 0 0 % k E » 2 E £ @ : 3E a) § R -0 m I a) -a £_ 3 o / @ 2 D _ � . £ 2 E / M k@ / ( CL : - $ E § � : § » ° � 2 m a) m o z @ m E 0 C = ƒ m J 'a 0 m 2 = 0 L \ < . (n § � 2 2 2 : E : 3 o P 7 2 -0 CL L) -0 _0 a \ ƒ .. » ; a / 3 E « % 0 0 �_ @ o a) 0 . o \ k v a) 0 2 E m- k R � � > § 2 E ¢ _ .g Q 0 3 § k a) 7 0 \ m E : - > 7 c 2 § q o f # E ' [ 2 2 p o 2 7 @ � \ / ® % E R C ƒ E \ / Q . £ � R £ n o _� S E 2 0 § 0 / c 2 \ L- > 2 a � � 2 CD .� Q o E U 7 ± £ o F- —1 40 U) 6 . . . � CD o ° � �_ � -C ^ D U 6 / E k > 2 > k : " 0 R � � �> _ = £ ._ ® £ (n D o @ � 2 / @ . - � k c @ _ £ o : w @ - \ R E £_ ® q m : > 0 2 \ C k � ƒ 2 k / ƒ _ '� 0) - S R 7 Fcu cu E U 2 » « co / � E & v � � \ U o \ - 3 2 k L- 0 * =_ _j \ O : Co M D , 7 \ @ _0 k / m = E m E@ w N ) � m Y § § 0 0 2 n B m ± k / ° o 0 0) § j \ a) x@ 0) 2 E@ @ 2 E o 0 E' / § $ / W k \ 0) k � u _ - E � / @ P 3 -0 3 A % m 2 Y 2 ƒ \ . . . / � ¢ • ( Fn \ 2 0 (Um e 2 k c 0 ƒ o 2 2 c \ § } ® 2 2 E @ R m E o © = ® \ ' § n = : ® ) ƒ e E ( E Cl) P 3 E @ 0 0 / 2 ' § ® 2 k cu E 0@ a E E � - u 0- 0 .- = o 0 3 o = Q = § » o@ > £ o o > E_ ( Q n ° f £ -0 _ 2 Q o � E £ S 4 § @ C 2 0 �_ 0 \ a � � ./ \ : / k 2 k k \ CY @ — @ m@ cn m n -0 _ � •E m Q m 2 @ ° 2 E = o 0 0 / x m ° 2 o S .% k § 7 2 2 m \ 7 @ m 3 : £ a c t _� . . c \ O � � \ .s ® / o § ° = cn � @ m = $ .$ k 2 § E / \ Q 0 > 3 E E Q- @ .� § n _ \ 0 > 2 0 a) cu 2 � C _ = E ƒ ® 0 o _0 'm 0 2 0 = P a. a. U- 0 ± 7 £ E a. o ro D E ¢ 7 © a = �_ m _ > o = o 7 0 > 0 'C V) - o / � � E � cu E - £ E £ _o R (n E q : 2 ƒ 3 ® a 2 / 2 = £If .7 E 2 CO k § 2 cu 2 k ) $ k a) / / 4- @ ® D £ E @ o _ U 3 e 2 = > £ R § 3 / @ ƒ o / q cu 6 -0 cu/ 0 -- / � � 0 k cu cl) \ _0 _ ' -0 _ _ -0 - E cu k � � b 2 2 § @ •- ' cu o 0- = 2 ° $ ® @ S = a D D m � a) @ LfiE 0 ƒ •/ ) o k 0 § \ 0 R ' / E ms _ = E n ® J E ® � 2 k / Y R 2 2 / k@ ® 2 b 0 \ . . 7 CL 0 o E § / : / 2 @ . 2 @ 2 / 2 \ ± - 0 > / o e ® % 3 CL L-E : E 6 E f o / e e k b k 2 k / k % k C 0 D � � m CL O = cn co _0 _ 0 o = o ® R J g c ' 7 3 / 0 � 0 L) k �k 0 (0 o � k cu ƒ ' D E Q m 2 6) @ § : § D 2 2 E � § _ k o a 7 / � ƒ R � \ 2 ƒ S o @ E $ _C R @ $ § « q \ > § § 0) CL @ o E = o £ 0— _ _ � 3 £ 3 ci £ U £ 0 2 . 6 u . e - . . . g o c 3 E — = t cn cn ` Cnc D V ai cc Q ay+ -0 ca M N _ a) o a) o _ O p_ 0 E ° o L c Q u°_i Q E U U ° -0 "-' O N N o N a) 0 0 �, U a) 0 0 0 p c 5 E " a) "- a) -C C2 cu cn cu 0 4j U p ° U a) .0) a) °' a) O O O p 0 0 U) ca c� o Y E U CU v 0 U N L U N c a) c6 Co _>> O c E c cv C p CQ Lp U C - p >, O O co cu a) a) � UD p C C _ U 0O a) c E cn m >' O N c U o � c a) L L -0 ;C a) ca a) y /ca CU Q O a) CC) m E 0 0 •L > j p d o) � o 0 O E •� z c � O a) _o E c Y 0 U) a. N o O U L1 � 0) 0 Q ° ca �. o U c U o Q.0 a) U U a) (D U) ac) o a) o � E c 0 o c Q r-� L ° ° -(-- w cn cn E ca o � >, c 0) a) c ° Ems, oo 0 of aoi CD ° a) V 0 3 � c°a O m m E c0i ° 0 0 jL Q U n o 3 U L CO U E CU U o O E C ° 0 o � co o -0 LL U o c� O c o 3 0 U CO � 0 c c amici 0) c n 0 o L cn 0) "-' 0 c 0) ~ a) Q- ca a) o o E 'c 'a, a) u ( N c c o c o cn Q E c E 0 c 0) cn _0 a) c 0 -0 m on c ctf p c c o 0 E Q o c°� U Y Q Q m C 2 m iL N y) O E a) Q- O c U 3 co) = o. • • _ LL U c p O 0 p C c _ Q ° a) >+ ° ° c m E cn Lj co c v 3 m e a) L E c� —a°) N i c a) c cu > a, cc o a) CL o c a) Q cn E � ° ° 0 M 0) U 3 m m E O c 0 -0 p_ Q O ca U) ca 0 c o C7 0 cLa c c M ' o o o (D Q- -0 o cn cl o L E a) N N L c U Y O cn 1c: cn cl cu Q O c Co o cni O >% Q o 0 L a) E CU O L Cn CO C) Q p .2 U E .E U CCf U cUE > w .� -0 U m O > 2 C O N Q N N O r m ]G � E 0C2 cu : / C- q _ @ @ 2 § § / m 'E \ Q .� -0 % _ - Z3 2 CL b /cq 2 $ = §e P o / cu k � : o U o O .� £ $ ./ E » Q O � § m E E / G 2 = k j � § k /� \ . k . < Ln . @ -0 _ / ~ � - � � j m E \ E _ 0 P @ / $ _E § ® § E � 2 g ° A � § q 3 7 § .ƒ 2 2 " @ 0 : § .g @ 0 % o 0 n o_ $ Q- 0 § E -o O � a) 8- Q) » @ E @ ca « ° E 2 . \ _ � ® E U) - 3 CD c £ § C o � m o / a) > cu £ : 2 \ V 0 C: 0 0 ' 0 k. Qk � � 2 — x / E ' o � 2 D o E 2 = CY = m % % E 0 0 9 a) o $ 3 2 \ / 0 C 0 -0 m \ ¢ � k 2 P � \ 3 3 2 2 ) 0 .0 0@ £ ( 7 o « 0) o / g $ o \� f 3 . \ t 76 ƒ 4-- \ 0 o ® \ £ ? t ) ƒ U) m » (n { co a) e \ § k \ \ CL _ � § \ 0 / >1 _ : Qo \ ¢ -0 E % 0 ) S 2 f / 7 £ @ C: w @ k <-C 2 \ 0 3 n m \ LL$ \ z = o \ � Attachment A FAIR HOUSING ANALYSIS Understanding the impediments to fair housing choice requires many levels of analysis. This analysis includes the following sections: • Summary of King County demographics and trends • Analysis of segregation patterns and trends • Analysis of racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty • Analysis of disproportionate housing needs • Analysis of disparities in access to opportunity along the following factors: - Education - Employment - Transportation - Environmentally Healthy Areas ® Analysis of publicly supported housing • Analysis of housing access for individuals with disabilities • Analysis of fair housing discrimination testing and housing mortgage disclosure data Each section includes an analysis of the dynamics and disparities for each issue, key contributing factors, and provides a brief overview of the existing programs and policies seeking to address these issues. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 26 Attachment A Demographic Trend Summary King County has seen significant demographic shifts since 1990 in overall population and makeup by race, ethnicity, and country of origin. King County's population has increased from 1,507,319 in 1990 to a 2017 Census estimate of 2,118,119, an increase of 41%. This was significantly greater than the overall U.S. population growth of 30% from 1990 to 2017. Please see Appendix A for a table containing key demographic data for King County as whole, each jurisdiction, and the unincorporated areas. Race/Ethnicity King County has become significantly more diverse, with the White, not Hispanic or Latinx population decreasing from 84.8% in 1990 to a 2017 Census estimate of 61%. The Asian and Latinx populations grew most rapidly in the same time period, increasing from 7.9% to 17% and from 2.9% to 9% of the overall population, respectively. The Black population grew from 5.1% in 1990 to a 2017 estimate of 6.2%. King County's racial and ethnic composition is similar to the larger Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue Metropolitan area. National 06gin A major contributor to the growth in King County is immigration from other countries. In 1990, 140,600 residents had a national origin other than the U.S. The 2017 King County estimate is 467,938, an increase of 333% compared to 1990. The growth of this population accounts for 54% of the overall population growth in King County in this time period, and our foreign-born population accounts for 22% of the overall population, significantly higher than the national average of 14% and similar to the Seattle-Tacoma- Bellevue Metropolitan area. There is significant variation between jurisdictions for the percent of their population that is foreign-born. The cities with the highest rates are: Jurisdiction Percent Foreign-Born SeaTac 41%_ Tukwila 40% ....... ......... Redmond 140% Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates The cities with the lowest percentages of foreign-born individuals are: Jurisdiction Percent Foreign-Born King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 27 Attachment A Milton 5% Duvall 6% Maple Valley 6% Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates Countries of origin with more than 15,000 residents in King County are India, China, Mexico, Vietnam, the Philippines, Korea, Canada, Ukraine, and Ethiopia. More than half of King County's foreign-born population originates from Asia. Language and Limited English Proficiency King County residents speak over 170 different languages, and more than a quarter of households in King County speak a language other than English at home. Six percent of King County households have limited English proficiency (LEP). Fifty five percent of LEP households speak Asian and Pacific Island languages, 20% speak Spanish, 16% speak Indo-European languages, and 9% speak other languages.18 The most common languages spoken by K-12 students with LEP in King County are: Language spoken bar LEP students Number of students in King Count Spanish 26,260 Vietnamese 5,575 Somali 3,786 Mandarin 3,552 Russian 2,543 Cantonese 2,263 Data Source:WA State Office of Financial Management, Forecasting Division, 2016 estimates Familial Status Despite other shifting demographics, household size in King County has remained relatively unchanged. Sixty percent of King County residents live in family households, married with or without children, or single parent households. The average household size in King County is 2.5 people. These figures are similar to the United States as a whole. There is significant variation in average household size between jurisdictions within King County. The cities with the highest average household sizes are: Jurisdiction Average Household Size Algona 3.4 'B Data Source: 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimate King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 28 Attachment A Sno ualmie 13.1 Sammamish 3.0 Duvall 3.0 Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates The areas with the smallest average household size are: Jurisdiction Average Household Size Sk komish 1.7 Seattle 2.2 Normandy Park 2.4 Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates The King County Office of Economic and Financial Analysis performs annual demographic trend analysis. Click here to visit their webpage.19 19 Lt s_+`Iwwav,ltingcognty cioWinde efident�foreca,;[irlg_I incl` 20CoLinty,c,2 EEcon comic°/n20lndicators/Demog r8 hics.as, x King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 29 Attachment A Segregation and integration in King County Understanding the nature of residential segregation patterns and trends in King County is a critical first step to understanding the barriers to fair housing choice. Geographically, residential segregation patterns in King County can be categorized as jurisdictions and neighborhoods that are predominantly White, predominantly White and Asian, or racially and ethnically diverse. South Seattle and Southwest King County experience the highest levels of racial and ethnic diversity, and are relatively integrated. Urban jurisdictions east of Seattle, such as Bellevue, Redmond, Sammamish, and Kirkland are predominantly White and Asian. Please see Appendix A for race and ethnicity information for each jurisdiction, King County as a whole, and the unincorporated areas of King County. Non-White residents have moved into urban areas throughout King County over recent decades, which paints an overall positive outlook for racial and ethnic integration in the future. However, as the non-White population is likely to continue to grow, the displacement and shift of the Latinx and Black community into Southwest King County does present a risk of persistent or increased segregation in the future. King County's segregation levels vary significantly by race. While Latinx and Asian populations experience similar levels of relatively low segregation, the Black population is highly segregated from the White population. The Dissimilarity Index provided by HUD measures the degree of segregation between two groups. A score of 0 would represent complete integration, while a score of 100 would represent complete segregation. Race Dissimilarity Index White/Non-White 35.81 Black/White 56.71 Hispanic/White 39.71 Asian/White 36.22 Data Source: HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool, Nov. 2017 Update Segregation Trends since 1990 In 1990, areas with significant non-White populations were primarily in Central and South Seattle. Over time, the non-White population has expanded into Southwest King County, with the Asian population also growing significantly in the urban areas east of Seattle. The most segregated areas of King County are those that are predominantly White in the rural areas, which have experienced relatively low population and job growth compared to the urban areas. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 30 Attachment A Population Change in King County Jurisdictions, 1980-2016 2,200 2,000 __.... Uninc. Rural 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 Uninc. Urban - 1,000 Suburban Cities 800 - 600 - ��. url 400 »� 11��>� ��✓ ,fT rir _� „ Beattie ' 200 O N -;r to 00 O N � lD 00 O N -;:r lD 00 O N Ct lO 00 00 00 00 00 M M M M O O O O O O ri ri ri r_1 M M M O1 M M M 01 M M O O O O O O O O O r q e-1 r-1 ri c-i r-I ri ri a-I r-I N N N N N N N N N Data source: 2010 Census and American Community Survey A major factor for why the rural area's population and demographics have changed relatively little is the Growth Management Act of Washington State (GMA). King County established an Urban Growth Boundary in 1992, in accordance with the GMA, and the boundary remains largely unchanged today. This boundary seeks to prevent sprawling, uncontrolled development and targets growth primarily in the western urban areas of King County. The urban areas have accommodated King County's growth in recent decades, while the rural area's demographics remain closer to King County's 1990 demographics. Suburban cities also annexed the majority of the urban unincorporated area, which accounts for the significant decrease in population in the urban unincorporated areas. Another segregation trend over recent decades has been that of income segregation. Middle-income or mixed-income census tracts have decreased from 57% in 1980 to 46% in 2017. Economic segregation indexes rate this metropolitan region as about average or slightly below average compared to other metropolitan regions in the U.S. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 31 -0 0 o co 0 N 0 co cD- E E 0 0 (D co E 0 L 0 rl4 (Y) cu 0- 0 CD D C) '0- 0 0) a) C: -0 > 2 M co U) U) Z U) Cf) 0 Co Co 12 (1) 0 LA -ZAK n,4 i�,, C3, U) co U) L- Cli (1) 0 (D CO w L co UA IS, Ulf o C) 2 b4 FU ca LI) Ln w LL 00" w F- .0Y cu tr E ro 0 C) N m E m 0 cu U) Ln .E LU x n 0 o (u U) U) Co a) 0 u c 0 C) 0 CLO , C/5 4T .E L) Attachment A Contributing Factors to Segregation _Race, National Origin, and Income Understanding the strong connection between race and income is critical to understanding segregation trends in King County. Race/Ethnicity 2017 Median Percent of King County Household Income Median Household Income All King County Households $83,571 Asian $93,971 112% White $88,638 106% Two or more races $70,046 84% Native Hawaiian and Other 75% Pacific Islander $62,500 Hispanic or Latinx $57,933 69% Some other race $52,070 62% American Indian and Alaska 55% Native $45,923 Black or African American $42,280 51% Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates As the preceding table shows, White and Asian households earn above, while all other races and ethnicities earn significantly below, the King County median income. Another significant income disparity that contributes to segregation trends in King County is between U.S.-born and foreign-born individuals. On average, foreign-born individuals earn $34,871, while US born individuals earn $41,983. The following table shows the median household income for households with at least one foreign-born adult by place of birth. The countries included are those with at least 5,000 King County residents. The disparities between different places of birth are stark: 2017 Median Household Place of Birth Income United Kingdom $150,511 India $137,966 Canada $124,101 Hong Kon $113,677 Germany $109,406 Taiwan $101,574 Japan $101,046 China $91,070 Philippines $90,575 Russia 1 $87,468 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 33 Attachment A Korea $81,777 Ukraine $75,967 Vietnam $72,978 Guatemala $65,595 Cambodia $55,034 Mexico $52,105 EI Salvador $46,098 Ethiopia $39,290 Somalia $17,178 Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates The most striking disparity is households with an adult born in Somalia, who have a median income below the federal poverty level, depending on household size.20 The preceding table also shows that while Asians as a single category earn above the King County median income, households with adults born in Korea, Vietnam, and Cambodia earn less than the King County median income. These income disparities are a major component to why immigrants and low-income people of color have moved into Southwest King County. Median household income by King County neighborhood,1990-2015 r a u 1990 2000 2006-2010 2011-2015 ®<$50,000 $50,000-364,999 _ $65,000-$74,999 = $75,000-569,999 = $90,000 and over Data scare_ us Ce,� Bureau,fsRQ&2000 ce,s. _ AI.E K l Survey(2006 2010,2b1.1-2615) Historical Redlining and Restrictive Covenants Two major institutional factors that have historically contributed to segregation in King County are the practices of redlining and restrictive covenants. Redlining was a practice 20 https:llaspe-hhs.yav!ocvefiy-guidelines King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 34 Attachment A used by lending institutions to systematically deny financial services to residents of specific neighborhoods, either by outright denial or by raising the price for their services. Restrictive covenants explicitly excluded residents from buying houses in certain areas, typically based on race and religion. These policies restricted access to homeownership opportunities for non-White communities. Homeownership is an important tool to building future wealth, and parental homeownership significantly increases the chance that their children will buy a home.21 These policies have likely had a major impact on intergenerational wealth and contributed to the systemic disparities identified throughout this report. The federal Supreme Court ruled against racially restrictive covenants in 1948, and the federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 outlawed both practices. However, their effects are still visible in King County's demographics today. The Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project, based at the University of Washington, provides a wealth of information about the history of segregation in King County. You can learn more about redlining and racially restrictive covenants; including mapping of both practices, here.22 King County's Topograph Another factor that may contribute to racial and ethnic segregation patterns in King County is its topography. Access to and views of Puget Sound, lakes, and mountains have a strong influence on housing prices and are dispersed throughout King County. Areas with these assets tend to have a majority White with significant Asian populations. The Latinx and Black populations in King County have significantly lower median incomes and are therefore less likely to live in these areas. Because housing with views or water access can be in close geographic proximity to housing without these assets, an area can be diverse from a jurisdictional or neighborhood level of analysis, but segregated at a sub-neighborhood or block-by-block level. An example of this trend can be seen in predominantly White areas along Puget Sound within the Cities of Burien, Normandy Park, Des Moines, and Federal Way, which transition to neighborhoods that are less than 50% White in distances as short as half a mile. Please see the next page for a map of the racial and ethnic composition of this area. 21 httpsJlwww.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/99251/intergenerational homeownership O.odf 22hitns:ilc;epts.wasriinnton.edulciyilrfsegregated.htm King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 35 Attachment A Race/Ethnicity Map—Southwest King County HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool Sr i,�, � Legend ti ,. g y„1 a i 0 Region Demographics 2010 1 Dot=20 White.Non-Hispar yj `4_ •M�+. .5 cam' . .tip Black,Non-Hispan t r :y , r n Native American, r . 3 ' c Hispanic ¢ yr �� M L� � ,' yeti a „a.+r a 'S;.� +• w Asian/Pacific lslani Hispanic Hispanic Other,Non-Hispan Multi-racial.Non-H k 4e ti jr,, r TRACT ✓n9 Esri HERE G2rrrm N Date created 611312019 _,.__,mss. .�- , .. _- � .. !. '•. `*- Name:Map 1-Race/Ethnicity Description: Current race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with P"ECAPs Data Source: HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool, Nov. 2017 Update Displacement of Residents Due to Economic Pressures King County has experienced dramatic increases in the cost of housing since the recession of 2008. Even as the overall number of homes has increased in the last ten years by 88,000, the number of rental homes affordable to low- and moderate-income families has decreased by 36,000. Affordability of Rental Housing Stock by Income Level King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 36 Attachment A 34, 380 356 359 360 357 3Z7 l 298 308 179 Y O >80%AMI 140 154 137 153 50-80%AMI 1034 98 101 119 107 101 � 0-50%AMI is IN 0 6 im iN 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: McKinsey.American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample This is due in large part to significant growth in higher-income households. Change in King County Households by Income Range, 2006-2016 Households 70,000 65,500 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 23,900 1 20,004 9,600 10,000 s Upper Income Less than $50,000 $50,000 - $124,999 $125,000 or More Data source:2017 ACS 1-Year Estimates Households of color are disproportionately likely to be severely cost burdened, paying more than half of their income toward housing costs. These trends have resulted in King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 37 Attachment A significant displacement of communities of color from Central and South Seattle into South Seattle and Southwest King County. Location and Type of Affordable Housing Southwest King County has historically been the area of King County with the most naturally occurring affordable housing, meaning that market rate housing has been affordable to households with lower incomes. As a result, residents displaced due to rising housing costs, many of whom are people of color, have relocated to this area. Due in part to its affordability, Southwest King County has also become home to lower-income immigrant communities over recent decades. These areas have also experienced faster rates of growth in housing costs compared to the more costly Seattle and Eastside submarkets. Land use and zoning laws Zoning codes significantly limit development in a majority of the urban areas of King County. Areas that allow only lower density development, such as single-family zoning or large minimum lot size requirements, are whiter than the King County average. Limiting the type of housing allowed to single-family homes, which is typically the most expensive form of housing, leads to economic segregation. This economic segregation effectively excludes the low-income communities that are highly correlated with protected class status.23 Private Discrimination and Lack of Enforcement of Existing Laws Community input and housing discrimination testing have found that private, individual-level housing discriminatory practice are still commonplace in King County and present an impediment to fair housing choice. Familial status, race, religion, disability, and national origin were all identified as having experienced housing discrimination. In addition to Federal Fair Housing laws, the State of Washington, King County, and jurisdictions within King County have implemented many policies aimed at reducing discrimination and addressing these disparities. However, funding for monitoring, education, and enforcement of these laws has been limited. Please see the Fair Housing Discrimination section for more information. Programs, Policies and Investments to Address Segregation, Fair Housin and Geographic Mobilit Communities of Opportunity Communities of Opportunity is an initiative undertaken jointly between Public Health — Seattle and King County and the Seattle Foundation to address zI�tips.rr A.<<d°d.nc Im.nih. ov/pm_c_,amcles'PI'v"iC580C_'__II King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 38 Attachment A inequitable outcomes based on geography. Geographic communities targeted currently include: • The Rainier Valley (City of Seattle) • White Center • SeaTac/Tukwila • The City of Kent • The Central District of the City of Seattle • Rural Snoqualmie Valley • The urban Native Community • The Latinx Community of Vashon Island • Transgender and gender nonconforming communities There is significant overlap between these targeted communities and federal protected classes. Each community develops its own vision and priorities, which may include: • anchoring multi-cultural communities at risk of displacement, • advocating for the preservation and development of affordable housing in areas that are in close proximity to transit, jobs, and education, • Access to health, affordable food and safe places outside to be physically active, especially for youth, • Workforce development that includes local hires, support of new local businesses, and inclusion of youth, and • Increased civic participation and engagement, cultural preservation, and access to safe public spaces. The majority of these efforts seek to empower and improve outcomes for protected classes, which may ultimately lead to greater integration due to economic mobility and mixed-income communities. Kind County Housing Authority's Small Area Fair Market Rent Policies In 2016, KCHA expanded its two-tiered system of payment standards (which involved a regular standard and an "exception area" standard that covered East King County)to create a ZIP code-based, multi-tiered structure with five payment standard levels. KCHA's adoption of multi-tiered payment standards recognizes the importance of closely aligned payment standards to local rental sub-markets as a means of achieving four goals: 1. Increasing access to high opportunity areas 2. Containing program costs by "right-sizing" subsidy amounts in lower and middle cost markets King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 39 Attachment A 3. Ensuring that new and existing voucher holders can secure and maintain their housing in competitive and increasingly costly rental submarkets across the county 4. Limiting the number of households experiencing cost burden. An internal assessment completed in 2017 found that households were more likely to move to higher opportunity areas after enactment of the policy: between 2015 and 2016, the proportion of new voucher holders with children leasing in higher cost areas increased by 8.4%, movers with children relocating from lower cost to higher cost areas increased by 4%, and nearly all racial groups experienced increased access to higher cost areas. Creatine Moves_toOpportunity The King County Housing Authority is partnering with the Seattle Housing Authority, MDRC, and a multi-disciplinary academic team that includes Raj Chetty and others from Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and MIT to identify strategies to increase opportunity area access among families with young children who receive a Housing Choice Voucher. The program, Creating Moves to Opportunity (CMTO), is being run as a multi-year randomized control test study that will test a range of services aimed at reducing rental barriers to opportunity neighborhood access; the end result from CMTO will be identified best practices that are both impactful and scalable. You can learn more about this program here.za za htTp,/./rreh±'nPn.0ves.crg/re5eF.rclil King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 40 Attachment A RACIALLY OR ETHNICALLY CONCENTRATED AREAS OF POVERTY Neighborhoods with high concentrations of poverty contribute to negative outcomes greater than the struggles of an individual family living in poverty. Concentrations of poverty limit educational opportunities, lead to increased crime rates and poor health outcomes, hinder wealth building, reduce private-sector investment and increase prices for goods and services, and raise costs for local governments.25 It is critical to understand the needs and dynamics that have led to the creation of these areas to understand barriers to fair housing choice. HUD defines a "Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty" (R/ECAP) as a census tract that is majority non-White and has a poverty rate greater than 40%. King County is privileged to have only a few R/ECAP tracts. This is due primarily to a relative lack of concentration of poverty and few areas that are majority non-White. There is only one RECAP outside the City of Seattle, in the East Hill neighborhood of the City of Kent. The East Hill RECAP tract is 38.5% White, 16% Black, 1% Native American, 22.3% Asian, and 21.5% Latinx and scores in the bottom decile of the HUD Poverty Index. This is a significantly higher rate of people of color compared to the King County average. King County had no R/ECAP tracts outside the City of Seattle in 1990. In 2000, a census tract in the City of Kent between 1-5 and Pacific Highway South was an RECAP with a White population of 46.6%, Black 17%, Native American 2%, Asian 13.5%, Hispanic 19.8%. The City of Kent has historically been an area with naturally occurring affordable housing, and has seen a significant amount of growth in the non- White population since 1990. The R/ECAP tracts are near major highways, a former landfill, and industrial activities, reducing the value of homes in this area and leading to higher rates of lower-income households. In 2018, Communities of Opportunity created the Kent Community Development Collaborative; a partnership of community-based organizations working to ensure everyone can participate and benefit from decisions that shape their neighborhood and greater community. The partnership convenes community forums focused on creating affordable, safe housing for Kent 2s htt s:/Iwww.F'uruser. u /sxxrt,i! e,ioo,icaIS em/sprinpl3/hi f'i i =,,7 �it,nl King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 41 Attachment A residents, as well as opportunities for living-wage jobs and access to healthy, affordable foods. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 42 Attachment A DISPROPORTIONATE DOUSING NEEDS Achieving fair housing means more than eliminating overt discrimination. This analysis also seeks to understand the disproportionate housing needs of protected classes. The following section analyzes the disparities in housing. There are stark disparities among households who are cost burdened and experience housing problems. The four housing problems, as measured by the US Census Bureau, are: • Incomplete kitchen facilities • Incomplete plumbing facilities • More than 1 person per room26 • Cost burden.27 Race/Ethnicity Percent of households experiencing at least one housing problem Hispanic or Latinx 56% Black 55.9% Other, Non-Hispanic 43.6% Native American 38.3% Asian or Pacific Islander 37.8% All Households27.1% White 3.9% Data Source: HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool, Nov. 2017 Update There are also significant racial disparities in severe cost burden28 that create a disproportionate need for affordable housing for non-White and non-Asian communities. Race/Ethnicity Percent Severely Housing Cost Burdened Black 29% Some other Race 26% Hispanic or Latinx 24% Native American 22% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 22% White 18% Asian 18% Data Source: 2015 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy 26 This measure includes all rooms, such as kitchens and living rooms. 27 Cost burden is when a household spends more than 30% of its gross income on household costs. 28 Severe cost burden is when a household spends more than half of its gross income on household costs. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 43 Attachment A Geographically, South Seattle and Southwest King County experience the highest rates of cost burden and severe cost burden. Rental vs. Homeownership Housing There are significant disparities in the rates of households who rent versus own along race, ethnicity, and foreign-born status. Household Percent of Households Percent of Households Type who Rent who Own All King County Households 43% 57% Black 172% 28% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 71% 29% All other Races 71% 29% Hispanic or Latinx 66% 34% Native American 161% 39% Two or More Races 60% 40% Asian 42% 58% White 38% 62% Foreign Born 50% 50% U.S. Born 140% 60% Data Source: 20175-Year ACS Population Estimate Areas of King County with high rates of rental housing are located primarily in the urban areas along 1-5 and east of Seattle. Within these urban areas, most rentals are located in the areas zoned for higher residential densities. Neighborhoods and jurisdictions composed of single-family homes are therefore more likely to be White and Asian, while denser areas are more diverse. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 44 Q r c "I ,No- W" + [i III Jfii . �iI' ek ! f o2 F^ Ln CY W z G W ✓ �n� i.� r � U_ IJ O IY Ok v O iW O o Z J 0 — OC I t= OSA �O <� J Z �. -A W zJf, m +,� ? O �m Y Z w _ � it tJ W M W ri LU . ' i biu Ori s CO �;P N 0 C (6 O Z N J $ k ? C Y Q s v R 0 ; J U Lv n Y N ,iD � O N r\I p rirpp J C �i 'O n u n _ _ C O ✓1 � lJ J d Q r ' r•l W Q z Q: 2' cu o= `� a � 0C7 a pe _j o yr. LL ..ry u•I fir: � Q y _ 1 f� ��...� � 1 w+ ¢ Ln ]C Attachment A Familial Status In King County, single individual households are most likely to be cost burdened. This is likely due to paying for housing costs with only a single income, and because younger people are more likely to earn less as they begin their careers. However, large families are also significantly more likely to experience housing problems, due primarily to the cost of larger housing and overcrowding. There is also significant variation in average household size by country of origin, likely meaning that certain immigrant populations face additional challenges obtaining sufficient housing for their families. The following table includes countries of birth with more than 5,000 King County residents. Place of Birth Average Household Size Somalia 14.0 EI Salvador 4.0 Mexico 3.9 Guatemala 3.9 Cambodia 3.5 Ukraine 3.5 Philippines 3.3 Vietnam 3.3 Ethiopia 3.0 India 2.8 Hong Kong 2.7 Russia 2.7 China 2.7 Japan 2.6 Korea 2.6 Taiwan 2.6 Germany 2.6 United Kingdom 2.4 Canada 12.4 Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates Low-income and immigrant communities have provided consistent input that there is a significant lack of affordable large-unit homes. A review of the publicly subsidized housing inventory in King County found that 27% of units are two bedrooms and 13% of units are three bedrooms or larger. Loss of Affordable Housing The stock of homes affordable to households earning 80% AMI or less has decreased since 2007, and is on a trajectory to continue decreasing. Between 2007 and 2017, the King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 47 Attachment A total number of rental units increased by 88,000, but the number of rental units affordable at 80% AMI and below decreased by 36,000. This is due to a combination of market pressures and the physical demolition of affordable housing. Significant growth in population and high-paying jobs in King County, particularly from 2013-2018, has increased the demand for housing, and the market has been unable to build enough new housing to accommodate this growth. Rents have increased dramatically in the last ten years, even in older, previously affordable buildings. As the urban areas of King County are already largely developed, construction of new housing can lead to a physical loss of affordable housing. Naturally affordable housing is often redeveloped as the value of the land is higher relative to the value of the structure. Naturally affordable housing can also be lost through renovations or remodels that increase the cost of housing. Language Barriers for Immigrant Households Limited English proficiency is an additional barrier some immigrant households face in their housing search. Rental postings and applications are typically not readily available in languages other than English. The need for translation services is therefore a disproportionate housing need for these households. Difficulty Transitioning from Temporary Cash Assistance for Refugees Refugees receive eight months of temporary cash assistance upon arrival.29 Advocates reported difficulty finding stable employment and obtaining affordable housing before this assistance expires. Even for refugees who are stably employed, establishing a sufficient employment and credit history over that period of time is a significant challenge and presents a barrier to securing housing. 29 https://www.dshs.wa.gov/esa/community-sef-v-.:es-offices/refugee-cash-assistance King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 48 Attachment A DISPARITIES IN ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY Fair housing choice is not only about combating discrimination. Intergenerational effects of discrimination and segregation have had a disproportionate impact on access to opportunity for protected classes in King County. The following sections summarize disparities; propose contributing factors to these disparities; and review policies, programs, and investments that seek to address these disparities. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 49 Attachment A Education Equitable access to a high quality education is a critical component to addressing intergenerational poverty and providing long-term economic mobility. Summary of Disparities/Dynamics The debate over how to measure or compare school proficiency is ongoing and beyond the scope of this analysis. However, the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction's "School District Report Card" provides relevant data and shows significant disparities between school districts. The following table provides an overview of the 19 School Districts in King County. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 50 N N M Ln M I- I O M 00 I'- Ln "t O) — O) N +•+ = CA I- -It Ln 0o Cl) -Ii Ln N O - Cl) O C — "zr — — — d ,+r_+ fn _ a 30 +a d 00 N 00 CO Ln o0 00 M N � N M 00 "t O "t O Ln _ - I-- 00 V) N r- CO O CO M 00 � Ln M 00 O d d ' O Ln — N CO 't co N co ti N L 7 Q � O O V •v d J = Q C y 0 CO CO N 0 U) ,t CO Cfl Ln O O � CO lzt co (n t co 4 Ln — r` Cfl O 00 `- N I-- N N ti v NN N N co 0 C� L awJ I� N N ti Ln I- CO Ln I-- (D Ln 00 Cl O CO 00 00 O 0 � N Cfl ti O 1- CA 00 i 00 S O N LO O) CO 00 L O Nl i O L V O 3 O Ln r rn aH � � C V 3 +' Co I- Ln 0 m O I� CA N O O O N O I'- N w L[) 0 LV Y r- N O M 'It O ,1- O qi I-- O N O) O Y E •� Q +•+ ti 00 M 't Ln 't Cfl M Cfl Ln O) Ln 00 00 00 N N C x CA Ln CA a0 a0 N O ;t N M N N N (A I- O 0) rV N N M N — N N L V N •= CL -i N U) oo O O O M N O CO Cfl r-- N L` = 00 M 0 It M M N O — -It 't M 4 00 N O M N N N N O V .� cn +-' N O O) O N M I-- 0 g M N O CO N I- Ln q M 3 = O CO I- Cfl N LO M M I- 0 w I- M w O N O O N co co I- N M M CO Ln N I- 'IT Ln M I— I— 1` .O �• L a � ) txo u 9 G1 Ln 0) C) CO — Ln 00 M N Ln N Ln Ln O q;t M O � V N Cfl M CO N O CO 00 N L) N N 00 — qt O N O- O 4+ C Ln M .;I- O 'IT I` m I,- I` Cfl Cfl Z I` r— t I` af2 IC N .O O LL L N L O N M ti N 7 O I'- 00 Ln Ln M Cfl 00 CO I- O 't Ln N O U) r t 00 CM M N CM N N 00 Ln Ln O CO M CO O N 0 M ti Ln M M 'IT w M "t Ln Cfl (fl Z r-- CO M CO 0 02 c 2 °c) "rto 4.0Q 4) _ (n ti 0 0 'IT M Ln N O M N II- M CO O 0 � 'It U) E ` O O O Ln N M C) "T00 V 4 C) Ln O t 00 CO Ln U) Il- 00 00 I- LO h CO Z f� CO 00 N a c y Ln .� O a � Y D T C U) U C (D t (0 N LB � coy m C r O O L O D LO 3 O O .v c`a c m c c E > m m c Y La c Y a) C c M O >, O t Y cn V •� 7 N C O N CU N O O N O t Y C m 7 LO fn D Q m w LL 2 Y J Z � 2 cA cn cn (n H F- > Attachment A The data show that school districts in Southwest King County are more diverse, have higher rates of students living in low-income households, and have a higher percentage of students who struggle to meet state standards. The school districts with the highest percentage of students meeting state standards are generally in the areas east of Seattle, which have significantly white and Asian student populations that are less likely to live in low-income households. Notably, the demographics of the student population are significantly less White than the general population, in keeping with the trends of an increasingly diverse King County. HUD also provides a School Proficiency Index, which measures the likelihood a student in King County of a given race or ethnicity attends a proficient school. Race/Ethnicity School Proficiency School Proficiency Index - Index Households below federal poverty line White 69.9 60.3 Asian or Pacific 63.9 54.4 Islander Native American 58.6 39.5 Hispanic or Latinx 54.5 51.6 Black 41.2 35.1 Data Source: HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool, Nov. 2017 Update This index also shows clear disparities, with the largest disparity between Whites and Blacks. This racial disparity persists among the population below the federal poverty level. Contributing Factors to _Disparities in Access to Education Local vs. State Funding Reliance on local funding for schools puts a proportionally greater burden on residents in lower-income school districts, which frequently have more diverse student bodies. The Washington State Legislature recently complied with a State Supreme Court ruling (McLeary v. State of Washington) by increasing school investments at the state level and limiting how much funding can be collected locally and on how it can be spent.30 Boundaries of School Districts 3°https:ll'en.wikipedia.orylwikilMcCleary v.. Washiri aeon King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 52 Attachment A With some exceptions, school districts in King County generally contain one of the three demographic categories of King County: predominantly White, White and Asian, or racially and ethnically diverse. This leads to racial, ethnic, and economic segregation, and limits opportunities for lower-income and non-White students to access the same resources as students living in wealthier areas. Parent-Teacher Associalion Funding Another contributor to disparities between and within school districts is funding provided by Parent-Teacher/Parent-Teacher-Student Associations (PTA/PTSAs). PTA funding perpetuates disparities through intergenerational wealth, as wealthier parents can invest in their children's school or in the specific program their child is interested in, bypassing the more redistributive investment patterns of government funding.31 This funding stream can be used for teacher salaries, supplementary equipment and materials, or other investments that can have an impact on student outcomes. In 2018, KUOW reported that Roosevelt High School, which is located in the Whiter and wealthier area of Northeast Seattle, has the largest PTSA and foundation funding in the Seattle School District with assets of$3.5 million and annual income of$225,586. Meanwhile, Rainier Beach, Franklin, and Chief Sealth High Schools, which are located in the historically non-White and lower-income area of South Seattle, have no PTSA or foundation assets or income.32 Programs, Policies, and Investments Addressinq Disparities in Access to Education King County's Best Start for Kids Lev Passed by the voters in 2015, Best Start for Kids seeks to put every child and youth in King County on a path toward lifelong success, funding a number of programs likely to target immigrants and communities of color that: • Build resiliency of youth and reduce risky behaviors, • Stop the school-to-prison pipeline, • Prevent youth and family homelessness, and • Meet the health and behavioral needs of youth. ei haps:l/cdn.americanarogress.org/corrten !uploads'2017i0gj1807?9Q<rPar(;ndFundraising-report- corrccted.pdf 32 hLtps:ilwww.kuow.org/storic,sisome-seattle-school-ptas-can-afford-extra-teachers-should-they-spread- the-wealth King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 53 Attachment A You can learn more about the programs funded through Best Start for Kids here.33 Race to the To In 2012, the Puget Sound Educational Service District, Auburn, Federal Way, Highline, Kent, Renton, Seattle and Tukwila School Districts and the King County Housing Authority jointly applied for and received a $40 million federal Race to the Top grant, allowing the group to further expand its programs, which work to: - Increase the number of children ready for kindergarten - Raise instruction quality in math and science - Help students plan for career training or college - Provide early intervention for struggling students Home and Hope Project Led by Enterprise Community Partners in conjunction with elected officials, public agencies, educators, nonprofits and developers, the Home and Hope project facilitates development of affordable housing and early childhood education centers on underutilized, tax-exempt sites owned by public agencies and nonprofits in King County. You can learn more about the Home and Hope Project here.34 33 https:llbeststartsblog.com! 34 hitpslievww_enterprisecomrnunity.org/where-we-wo.rklpacific-northwestlhome-hop King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 54 Attachment A Employment The geographic distribution of employment centers can result in barriers to opportunity and have a disproportionate impact on low-income communities of color. Longer commutes can have a detrimental impact on an individual's health from increased stress and exposure to air pollution, and are associated with less physical activity and a poorer diet. Summary of Dynamics/Disparities The Labor Market Engagement Index provided by HUD measures the level of employment, labor force participation, and educational attainment in a census tract, and shows disparities by race and ethnicity in King County. Race/Ethnicity Labor Market Labor Market Engagement Index— Engagement Index Households below Federal Poverty Line White 74.6 64.8 Asian or Pacific 72.5 62.0 Islander Hispanic or Latinx 61.4 1 55._3 Native American 58.5 147.0 Black 56.4 147.8 Data Source: HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool, Nov. 2017 Update Within the population below the poverty line, Whites are still significantly more likely to live in areas with low unemployment compared to Blacks. The White population is the most likely to live in an areas with low unemployment, while the Black population is the least. However, the Native American population living below the poverty line is the group least likely to live in areas with low unemployment. Based on the HUD mapping tool, there is no clear geographic disparity in access to jobs for protected class groups. The jobs index is strong in the Duwamish and Kent Industrial Valley, which is at the core of the racially and ethnically diverse Southwest King County. The jobs index is also strong in the urban areas east of Seattle. Contributing Factors to Disparities in Access to Employment Geographic Segregation of_ qh_-Skilled Jobs A key factor not captured by the HUD Jobs Proximity Index is the nature of the jobs in a given area. King County is privileged to have hundreds of thousands of high-skill, high- paying jobs at leading corporations in the technology, engineering, health, and maritime industries. Boeing has a major facility in Renton, which is accessible to the diverse areas King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 55 Attachment A of King County. However, the growing tech sector, which is primarily located in Seattle, Bellevue, and Redmond, can be a long commute from Southwest King County. Programs, Policies, and Investments Addressing Disparities in Access to Employment King County Investments in Affordable Workforce Housing The 2019-2020 King County budget included more than $100 million in transit-oriented development for affordable workforce housing. These projects will produce hundreds of units that will have access to employment hubs in King County. The King County Housing Authority has also focused on acquiring housing in Bellevue, Redmond, and Kirkland to support the workforce in these areas and provide new opportunities for low- income households to live in areas closer to job centers. King County Employment and Education Resources King County Department of Community and Human Services provides employment programming. You can learn more about these services here.35 '' itr,.=.,,:'v•. .�,�.i:ingcounty.govlder)ts£community-human-serviceslemployment-and-education- lFSi lJt�:r:S.r`G�R King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 56 Attachment A Transportation Transportation is a major concern in King County, given its topography and significant growth over recent decades. Transportation is typically the largest household cost after housing and is deeply intertwined with housing cost and access. Summary of Disparities/Dynamics The variation in the Low Transportation Cost Index provided by HUD is low, with Native Americans and Whites scoring the lowest, at 71.3 and 72.0. There are more pronounced disparities in transit use by race. Race/Ethnicity Percentage who commute via transit White 6.5 Black 9.4 Native American 6.2 Asian 7.8 Hispanic or Latinx 6.4 Two or More Races 6.4 Data Source: 2017 5-Year ACS Population Estimates Native Americans are least likely, and Blacks are significantly more likely to commute using public transportation. Transit access is generally highest in the City of Seattle and adjacent suburbs, including those in Southwest King County. The relatively lower transit index scores and higher transportation costs for the White and Native American populations is likely due to the rural Muckleshoot reservation and the higher rates of Whites in the rural areas of King County, which have limited transit service. Contributing Factors to Disparities in Access to Transportation Transportation Infrastructure Investments Investments in transit infrastructure have a complicated effect on access to transportation and housing costs for protected classes. Lower-income households are more likely to struggle to afford transportation costs and should be given priority or strong consideration when planning long-term infrastructure investments. However, dramatically improved transit access to an area increases its desirability overall and can increase the cost of housing, creating a risk of displacing the residents the infrastructure was originally meant to serve. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 57 Attachment A Programs, Policies and Investments Addressing Disparities in Access to Transportation Sound Transit Light Rail Ex ansion and Equitable TOD Polic Approved by voters regionally in 2016,Sound Transit 3 will dramatically expand the region's light rail network, connecting high and lower opportunity areas across King, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties. You can learn more about Sound Transit's plans here.36 Construction of the light rail network requires purchasing storage and staging areas that become surplus once construction is complete. Sound Transit's Equitable TOD Policy37 commits to ensuring there is affordable housing in close proximity to transit stations. In 2018 and in accordance with state law, Sound Transit adopted a plan to offer a minimum of 80 percent of its surplus property that is suitable for development of affordable housing.38 King County Metro's Orca LIFT Reduced Fare and Equity in Service Planning King County Metro was the first transit authority to introduce a reduced fare for low- income residents. The program provides up to a 50% discount in fares to ensure low- income communities are not overly burdened by the cost of transportation. You can learn more about Orca LIFT here.39 King County Metro also incorporates social equity into its long-range service planning, placing an importance on serving historically disadvantaged communities, which are more likely to contain residents who are a protected class. Today, 76% of low-income households in King County are within 1/4 mile of a bus stop.40 PSRC Growing Transit Communities In 2010, the Puget Sound Regional Council, in collaboration with 17 community partners, applied for and received a $5 million Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant from the HUD Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities. The grant funded the creation of the Growing Transit Communities Partnership, with a work 36 htt p:;,'stnundtrai7srf3.Urc,/overview 37 htips_'eww,v.soundtransit.org/sites,'der"auI-t-I-les/20 40423 PPT TOD,.pdf 36 fatt s:',www.soundlransit.orca/cet-to-know-us/news-eventslnews_releases'board-adapts-policy` prom otrna-equitable-development-near 39 Iltt[7S:I/I{fngC0unty.90V,depts/transportation/metro/fares-Orcaiorca-cardsilift.aspx 40 https://yVww.kii7pcoun Cy.❑ovielcctediCXeCLItive/cotistentine, rioritie-s/transportation,'infograptaic/sources.as PX King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 58 Attachment A program intended to address some of the greatest barriers to implementing the central Puget Sound region's integrated plan for sustainable development and securing equitable outcomes. The strategy includes providing housing choices for low- and moderate-income households near transit and to provide equitable access to opportunity for all the region's residents. You can learn more about the Growing Transit Communities Strategy here.41 Additionally, the most recent regional Fair Housing Assessment was conducted by the Puget Sound Regional Council in 2014. You can read the PSRC Fair Housing Equity Assessment here.42 King County Transit-Oriented Development Investments In 2016, King County began a 5-year competitive RFP process to invest approximately $87 million in transit-oriented affordable housing projects. You can read the full plan here.43 The 2019-2020 King County budget also included more than $100 million in transit-oriented development for affordable workforce housing. 41 htlpsJ/%rwvw.psrc.orglgromnq-transit-communities 42 https:/Iwww.r)src.orglsitesfdefaultlfileslfairhousingeguityassessment.pdf 43 https,iwvww.ltingcounty. ov!-lmedialde tslcommunil -human-servicesihousin fdocumentslhousin financeitod-band-aliocation-plan-final-srn.ashx?la=en King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 59 Attachment A Environmental Health All households deserve access to open space, healthy foods, and toxic-free environments. However, lack of access to those amenities and exposure to environmental hazards has been a chronic issue for low-income communities. SummarV of Disparities/Dynamics According to the HUD Environmental Health Index, which uses EPA estimates of carcinogenic, respiratory, and neurological toxins in the air, there is a significant racial disparity in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. A higher score represents greater access to healthy environments. Race/Ethnicity Environmental Health Index White 27.0 Black 10.4 Hispanic or Latinx 16.0 Asian or Pacific Islander 17.6 Native American 129.6 Data Source: HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool, Nov. 2017 Update Black residents in King County are the least likely to have access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Native Americans scored the highest, a few points above Whites, likely due to a greater percentage of Native Americans living in rural areas. King County contains the lower Duwamish waterway, a Superfund site designated in 2001. The river has been contaminated with a number of pollutants over the decades, most notably a significant amount of polychlorinated biphenyls, arsenic, carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, and furans. This makes fishing in the Duwamish, particularly for shellfish and bottom-feeding fish, unsafe. The neighborhoods along the Duwamish house many immigrants and communities of color that have fishing as a component of their way of life or identity, and there has been an ongoing challenge of communicating the risks of fishing in the river to these communities.44 14h(tp:,iwww.sea ttleclirabaIist.cr)mi2015/05/Q4lduwamish-m c-r-cleanut..-plans-iriirii�,rant-fis!x:rn7en- polluti©n-spperfund26642 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 60 Attachment A �. Former Ranvier Brewery ', Lower Duwamish Waterway, .^r i1e x r , Cleanup Sltes m 31 � '4" General Electric Aviation Div t � 'F1 #st Art Brass Plating Inc Seattle Duwamish Shipyard � , x"-.11 ''' •� Burlington Environmental LLC Georgetown c c - � C•�I,._ Blaser r� Die Casting Cc Glacier Northwest hwest Inw a Capital Industries Inc Port of"Seattle R �1 Duwamish Marine Center �` I r ,'"""1 7 North Terminal �\I tit Ichc�d Ty:c\ r 1 >Mp� F Ave Building 'k ro f. o- R North Boeing Fold Goorgotown Sleam Planl Portof Seattle Terminal 115 - - �' }h• Cro y Menno Sices ath Ave S Ohd% Douglas Management Dock •lu r� _ eryBoeing Electronics Mfg k� ✓ p M� s j Industrial Container Services WA LLC 4 t A Wst Boeing Plant 2 - I IT ra " sd r South Park Marina t >a k4 Jorgensen Forge Corp w.^ fi4pplkSouth Park Landfiall � Portof SeatBe Boeing Isaacson Thompson a#Terminal 117 77- 8801 E Marginal Way S A r ror .w o 46a 4k r_ . 4 �^r_�� Container Properties LLC 4e N ��j,.pa.• FP*',q i� -It � ��a �,,.af Y �• R!'p'% µ 4� LegenIF d `r�yy."1 EwbeY MO CMare%(TCP) 4 Erwbe�eae�wa w(e•+w.,al e+i � -r�'p, Boeing Field Chevron 9 Data Source:Washington State Department of Ecology Toxic Cleanup Program45 45 https://eco[ogy.wa.gou!Spills-CleanLir)!Cofitainina[ion-cleanup/Cleanup-sites!Toxic-cleanup-siteslLower- Duwamish-Waterway. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 61 Attachment A Five hundred thousand King County residents do not live within '/ mile from a publicly owned park, green space, or trail, and most of these residents live in Southwest King County.a6 OPE S CE I U T S I . KI G COU' `1�T"1' stNO"OMSH COUNTY ...-ai 11 ...r7.:nr:vitLE — KINGCOUNTY 1 i _ � 'M.IRNIAIitl SEATTLE til�i i ilZ w. tie h':'lE D i.LL':JL ..... yJ e sC:.Til.E yyhR s� A r '" •c�."�, SIiGf1UAl.l�l lf Tak, TU ILA I,RF-Nr � 1!• r_ AY r� .StAr KENT 110 o to IN! 1,_ ! ,m,'tlI1NY1�GTON•'M gPtE,. ',moi yyky.. w Atm kN .: , •!#"' PIERCE COUNTY Opportunity Areas r Locations where households lack open space rr-i access and simultaneously fall In the bottom third of census tracts for household income and top third t,y fNUNCLAM' of census tracts for hospitalization rates due to asthma,diabetes,and heart disease. `. Urban Area Incorporated Area park N Note:`lack of open space access"is defined as households that are greater than a quarter mile distance fmm a publlclyowned and accessible park greenspace or trail. TMa��n.nvm+.•. .,�u...-, ,. .. ��II.. y/lrwr w,.ew.y. o4 v,. 41 NY�•rv-]w..ro,Y.Y.= aY,YYyfp„�..]t.r,}••y- .�rpyXAv. `..'_yr„in. •d as hit?s .' kin coup ov/dnr Ilibra (water-and-landlland-conservation/e uit 120190319-0 en- Space-Fruity-Cabinet-Report.pdf King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 62 Attachment A Lack of access to healthy food options can have negative health outcomes.47 Lower- income communities of color are also more likely to live in "food deserts", which are defined as urban areas lacking access to a supermarket within one mile or rural areas lacking access within 10 miles. Again, these areas a primarily located in Southwest King County. King County Food Deserts ot Kllwgna• aeahma � , *`�a. �" � 4 ` .1 10 01 JO C a. �+ auk r r' r,r4 M M w+Mt da�Mh Gna111wIM1 '-:g..A.�F wr mow., � Via. y�.•._ �IIIII" , F rA M enc•i.nl. "I+1. aw�l�- � �.r., ". �. 4 Data Source: USDA Food Access Research Atlas.48 Contributing Factors to Disparities in Access to Healthy Environments Environmental Hazards Near or its Lower-Cast Housing Housing costs are lower in areas adjacent to environmental hazards, industrial zones, airports, and highways, and farther from green open space and other amenities that improve health. Lower cost housing is also more likely to be older, which increases the 47 hitos://wwW ncbi.nim.nih.gov/books/NBK208018/ 48 https://www.ers.usda.AoWdata-products food-access-research-atlas/go-to-the-alias/ King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 63 Attachment A likelihood of asbestos, mold, and lead paint contamination. Because of the deep connection between race and income due to legacies of discrimination, non-White communities are more likely to live in housing with these problems. Access to Open Space and Healthy Food Options is More Expensive Housing near amenities that improve health outcomes are desirable and therefore more expensive. Again, because of the deep connection between race and income, non- White communities are less likely to have access to these areas. Programs, Policies, and Investments Addressing Disparities in Access to Healthy Environments King County Open Space Equity Initiative King County convened 21 residents representing 12 different community-based organizations located throughout King County to develop recommendations to ensure more equity in providing access to greenspace and open space and advise the County on how to best engage communities and cities to add open space in underserved areas. You can learn more about the Open Space Equity Cabinet and read their full report here.49 Public Health — Seattle & King County Environmental Health Services Public Health has many programs that seek to address environmental hazards and improve access to environmentally healthy areas. You can learn more about their services here.50 Environmental Justice Network in Action The Environmental Justice Network in Action (EJNA) is a partnership between the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County, community-based organizations, nonprofit groups and government agencies. EJNA works to: • Identify the key environmental and health concerns of low income communities, people of color, and immigrant and refugee communities through jointly conducted needs assessments Identify the public engagement strategies that work best for particular populations and share these a9 htips: kingcouniy.gov!services!envrronment/water-and-land,'land-consen,atioii/Equity,'QpenSE}ace ast?x eo https:Ilwww.kingccsunty.gov!depis/health/environmental healih.aspx King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 64 Attachment A • Improve the capacity of CBOs, non-profit groups and government agency partners to design, deliver and evaluate programs and services. You can learn more about the EJNA here.51 11 https//www.hazwastehelp.o_rrEi•iviroiimenEaIJLjstice/eina.as;)x King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 65 Attachment A Conclusion - Disparities in Access to Opportunity The previous analysis shows that immigrants and communities of color are more likely to live in areas with higher rates of poverty and environmental hazards and fewer economic and educational opportunities. High opportunity areas in Seattle and the urban areas east of Seattle are predominantly White and Asian, while Black and Latinx communities primarily live in Southwest King County, which has less access to opportunity. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 66 Attachment A PUBLICLY SUPPORTED HOUSING ANALYSIS Fair access to and the location of publicly supported housing can have major impacts to access to opportunity for protected classes. Summary of Publicly Supported Housing Disparities/Dynamics The Seattle, Renton, and King County Housing Authorities collectively operate over 19,000 units and administer tenant-based vouchers for nearly 18,000 households. Other programs provide affordable housing, such as Low-Income Housing Tax Credits, Multifamily Housing Tax Exemptions, inclusionary housing programs, and other local funding sources provide affordable units. Publicly supported housing is distributed throughout the urban areas of King County. AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN MING COUNTY Filters »IylsrwapC ri•:tn. Affordability Range *96 �.-3O%AMI) IL f Location d 'k •nYyc,_Iuang Seattle � �_a `EJ organization _�'. - IMn6�' �• All . ��. Legend ' "' ` * s • Affordable Housing Type Homeownership Property 41 Rental Property • '= 4a Property Size(Units) <u r'r�s O it-SO 51-100 ®;oi-zso .: ®>zso 0 Affordability Range : nr • It<30%AMI . 30-60%AMI * 60-80%AM -—. ........Q'.__. M—d(30-804 AMI) Each shape represents an . � apartment property. M King County King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 67 Attachment A There are high concentrations of publicly supported housing in the downtown core of Seattle, which is zoned for greater density and has high access to opportunity. KCHA provided racial demographics of the households who utilize their programs. Housing Percent Percent Percent I Percent Percent Type White Black Hispanic Asian or Native Pacific American Islander Public 53.9 121 6.9 19.4 0.6 Housing Project- 48.9 29.7 10.4 15.6 1.2 Based Voucher Tenant- 49.3 39.1 6.4 6.7 1.5 Based Voucher Data Source:King County Housing Authority Black households are significantly more likely to utilize the Housing Choice Voucher Program, while Asians and Pacific Islanders are more likely to utilize public housing, relative to utilization of other housing types. Notably, Hispanic or Latinx households are underrepresented in all categories compared to their overall percentage of the King County population, despite being more likely to be housing cost burdened. Consistent with HUD policy and guidelines, KCHA seeks to provide access to all members of the community who are eligible for federal housing assistance. This includes eligible members of the immigrant and refugee community, mixed-eligibility families (where assistance is pro-rated based on the number of eligible household members), and US citizens. Contributing Factors to Publicly Supported Housing Location and Access Lack of_public investment in specific neighborhoods While publicly supported housing is located in most jurisdictions, many of the highest- opportunity areas of King County have lower rates of publicly supported housing. Land Use and Zoning Laws Neighborhoods and jurisdictions in King County that are zoned for single family homes are less likely to contain publicly supported housing, as the majority of public housing developments are multifamily properties. This limits publicly supported housing access in single-family zones to recipients of housing choice vouchers. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 68 Attachment A Programs, Policies, and Investments Addressing Disparities in Location of and Access to Publicly Supported Housing Housing Authority Planning and Policies The Seattle, King County, and Renton Housing Authorities consider racial and geographic equity as part of their long-term planning processes. As noted in KCHA's Moving to Work Plan52, KCHA's long-term goals include providing greater geographic choice for low-income households — including residents with disabilities and elderly residents with mobility impairments— so that residents have the opportunity to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools and convenient access to services, transit, health services, and employment. The 2019 Plan also includes short-term goals regarding broadening geographic choice to support economic and racial integration in the region —through new property acquisitions, creation of family-sized affordable units, and through myriad strategies to ensure voucher holders have broad access to units across King County. The KCHA Board of Commissioners passed a resolution in 2012 which directs staff to give strong consideration to opportunity area indicators, including education and employment, when acquiring new properties, siting project-based Section 8 subsidies, and making other policy and programmatic decisions. Recent policy changes and programmatic decisions have reflected this consideration, including the adoption of small area payment standards, the siting of project-based subsidies in high opportunity areas, and piloting of mobility counseling strategies as part of Creating Moves to Opportunity. While the Hispanic and Latinx community has historically been underrepresented in subsidized housing, KCHA has made efforts to ensure access. In the recent waiting list opening for the Housing Choice Voucher program staff made a concerted effort to connect with relevant service providers and organizations with connections to this community. As a result, KCHA serves a large number of immigrants and refugees through the Housing Choice Vouchers and Public housing programs, a diversity that is similarly reflected among King County's population. Dina County TOD Preservation and Acquisition Plan King County's 2019-2020 budget included funding set aside for a partnership with KCHA to implement a TOD Preservation and Acquisition Plan. The plan currently 52 http$'//wvwt'kc[ia.org/docLin)en1,s!90_ndf King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 69 Attachment A proposes preserving 582 units in the coming years. You can learn more about the plan here.5s KCHA targets the preservation of affordable housing in communities at the highest risk of displacement (including those along emerging mass transit corridors) and in high opportunity areas characterized by access to high-performing schools, jobs, and transportation. After KCHA purchases a property, rents are only increased as operating costs rise, making these properties increasingly affordable over time. s3 https:r','nikccf�gisearch k�n.gcrun_y Legislation[3etail.aspx?ib=38766108GL11D=DDSC9E4E-56 C- 4AD6-9676-C24FE3FC68f 5&C]�tioiis=Advanced85earcli= T King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 70 Attachment A DISABILITY AND ACCESS ANALYSIS While people with disabilities may experience the same fair housing issues as individuals without disabilities, there are also distinct disability-related barriers. For example, some individuals with disabilities may need specific accessibility features or additional services in housing, transportation, education, and other programs or facilities in order to have an equal opportunity. Summary of Disparities/Dynamics People with disabilities are dispersed throughout King County, with no clear concentration or pattern of segregation. King County and Washington State have made significant strides in supporting people to live in the most independent living arrangement possible and transitioning out larger institutions over the last fifty years. The single major remaining institution for people with disabilities in King County is Fircrest Rehabilitation Center, which houses and provides programming for about 200 individuals. Disabilities take many forms, and it is important to differentiate the needs of different groups. The following table shows the percentage of King County residents with the different types of disabilities, as measured by the Census Bureau. It is important to note that this table does not include all disabilities, such as behavioral health issues. Disability Type Percent of King County Residents Hearing Difficulty 3.1% Vision Difficulty 1.6% Cognitive Difficulty 3.9% Ambulatory Difficulty 4.8% Self-care Difficulty 2.0% Independent Living Difficulty 3.5% Data Source: HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool, Nov. 2017 Update Contributing Factors to Disability and Access Issues Cost of Reasonable Accommodations Increases Likelihood of Discrimination Providing reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities is more likely to carry a financial burden to a housing provider than providing housing to other protected classes. This increases the likelihood of discrimination. While not a large enough sample to be statistically significant, housing discrimination testing conducted in King County in 2019 found evidence of discrimination in eight out of seventeen tests conducted by people with a disability. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 71 Attachment A Disability as a Barrier to Seeking and Securing Housinq A disability in and of itself can make it difficult to tour housing or submit applications in a timely manner. Income and Education Gap for People with Disabilities Nationally, people with disabilities earn 64% as much as people without disabilities, and about 10% of adults with a disability have a bachelor's degree or higher, compared to more than 25% of working-age adults without disabilities.54 In 2019, individuals whose primary source of income is a Social Security Disability payment can receive a maximum monthly benefit of$2,861, with a national average of$1,234. These disparities contribute to people with disabilities being less likely to afford housing. COmolex Network of Resources and Multifaceted Nature of Disability Community There are dozens of organizations and resources for people with disabilities in King County. However, most organizations either provide one type of support or target individuals who live with a certain type of disability. This can make accessing support confusing and difficult. Disability advocates requested a "one-stop shop" that provides an inventory and navigation of all of the resources available for people with each type of disability. Growing Population of Older ,4dulis Although age is not a federally protected class for fair housing, it is in King County, and is correlated with disabilities such as mobility, hearing, vision, and self-care issues. Due to a combination of increasing longevity, declining birthrate, improvements in medical technology and other factors, the population of Americans over age 65 will double over the next 25 years.55 Significant investments will be necessary to meet the increasing demand for accessible housing. Programs, Policies, and Investments to Address Housing Access for Disabled Individuals Home Care Services 54 httpsil/www air.c)rgf'sites,ldefault/files/Lack°/a20of%2OE4ual°/a2OPav°/*20for°/o2{ People°/`20with°/*2ODisabili ties Decl%2014.pdf ss https://www.cdc.goy/aptnq;'pdf/state-aging-health-in-ame:rica-2013,pdf King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 72 Attachment A Many aging and disabled individuals remain in their homes through in-home care. Caregivers may visit or live in the client's home, depending on their needs. These services are provided by dozens of providers in King County. Adult Family Homes Housing resources for disabled individuals is also provided through adult family homes, which are located throughout King County and are offered by a number of housing providers. Publicly Supported Senior Housing Publicly supported housing projects that target seniors are a large percentage of King County's public housing portfolio. Low-Income Housing Tax Credit projects also frequently build housing targeted to older adults. Housing Accessibilit Modification Program King County's Housing Repair Program serves renters with disabilities who require modifications to their unit. You can learn more about this program here.56 Movinq Toward Age Friendly Housing in King County King County, the City of Seattle, and other partners undertook an effort in 2018 to understand the needs of the aging population and make recommendation to increase access to affordable housing for older adults. Key recommendations include: - Increase supply of affordable housing that meets the needs of a diverse, aging population. - Create accessible housing that meets the needs of a diverse aging population You can read the full report here.57 s6 https:,'+kinacoupty.govidepts/comm unity-hLim an-serviceslhousin,glservi-esi'houst ng-ren a,irig rants,aspx 57 hitp:,,/www.aginckingcounty„orcilwp- conteflt.�L),2loadsisiles!'I 3512018/02!MovinoTowardAgeFriendlyHousingl fiKinciCounty.Ddf King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 73 Attachment A FAIR HOUSING DISCRIMINATION DATA ANALYSIS Laws banning housing discrimination are insufficient if housing providers do not comply. This section reviews data regarding discrimination against protected classes. Housing Discrimination Testing Community and stakeholder input reported that despite being illegal for over 50 years, individual-level discrimination in applications for rental housing remains a systemic issue. King County and partner cities chose to conduct field-testing to collect data on the nature and extent of housing discrimination in King County. King County and partner cities contracted with the Fair Housing Center of Washington to conduct at least 65 differential treatment tests and 15 policy tests in jurisdictions across King County. Differential treatment tests are two-part, in which a member of a protected class and a control tester apply for the same housing. Policy tests ask housing providers direct questions about their policies, such as accommodation for a disabled individual or whether they rent to families with children. A "positive" result is a test that found evidence of discrimination. The Fair Housing Center of Washington tested for the following protected classes: • Race • National Origin • Religion • Disability • Familial Status The final report provided by the Fair Housing Center of Washington reported positive test results in 34 out of 66 differential treatment tests and seven positive results out of 16 policy tests. These results are troubling and indicate that protected classes continue to face barriers to fair housing choice. Because the testing was spread across five protected classes in 24 jurisdictions, the data are insufficient to provide statistical significance for more granular findings. Please see Appendix B for a copy of the final testing report. Housing Mortgage disclosure Act Data Fair access to financing for homeownership is a critical component of housing choice, and a major potential barrier. This analysis reviewed 2016 and 2017 summary data provided by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that tracks the outcomes of applications for mortgages for primary residences in King County by race. This data set does not include applicants' income, the size of the loan applied for, or other relevant factors that influence whether a loan is approved or denied, and is therefore not proof of individual-level racial discrimination on its own. There are, however, troubling disparities. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 74 Attachment A Race Percent of primary residence home loan applications denied White 5.7 Asian 7.2 Black 11.6 Hawaiian or Pacific 6.5 Islanders Native American 9.8 Data Source: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau n Black households are more than twice as likely to be denied a loan as White households. Native Americans are also significantly more likely to be denied a loan than Whites. It is also notable that Black applicants accounted for 2.8% of mortgage applications, despite being 6% of the King County population, which reflects earlier analysis regarding the racial disparities for rental and homeownership rates. Further outreach and analysis is necessary to understand the dynamics contributing to these disparities. 58 httconSLlnlC�'ir-iance-pov/da.lay-re5e arrh/1ir..1c:aiexnlore King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 75 Attachment A FAIR HOUSING GOADS Informed by community input from other planning processes and the previous analysis, this section proposes a set of priority actions to achieve fair housing choice in King County. These goals are also written in the context of the programs, policies, and plans that currently seek to eliminate barriers to fair housing choice. 1. Invest in programs that provide fair housing education, enforcement, and testing. 2. Engage underrepresented communities on an ongoing basis to better understand barriers and increase access to opportunity. 3. Provide more housing for vulnerable populations. 4. Provide more housing choices for people with large families. 5. Support efforts to increase housing stability. 6. Preserve and increase affordable housing in communities at high risk of displacement. 7. Review zoning laws to increase housing options and supply in urban areas. 8. Work with communities to guide investments in historically underserved communities. 9. Support the Affordable Housing Committee's efforts to promote fair housing. 10.Report annually on Fair Housing Goals and progress. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 76 Attachment A CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEMS This report analyzes access to fair housing choice along a number of factors, provides information on past and current efforts, and sets initial goals for future policies and investments. This report is planned to be submitted to the King County Council by the beginning of September and approved by early November. This section will be updated as next steps are identified and the report advances through the following timeline. TIMELINE AND NEXT STEPS September-December p a -d 4 -O . O '0�a n c7 q ell d „ 0 p o d fir' � '� �, �,,� � �'� �•+, G G �� cow �� >�o, G �' 6 t0 tf� Cf tD LD rr fir*ap 01 t' June-August King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 77 Q c t t., *I* 2E F2e 2ET* * 2: aCT ig ae aR E �FT32 m o,bo,,ti o, oLo Is 0 o .y bIoIL7,Q.0 rv_E N o ol0 N of a a 2 i f ! ! E E e E ! € I f 1 :3 1 EEEE .�CN�o:Q�o:mC'epvpjwio�v,jN,o �o .�io !a1,4O'olmlo'n'm 0=olo=,nINCn ,c ,n ,nlm rn;o,N .y OIi 'y .Oi I,O-IO IOf N;N; ,N,�, a € !I c e i I I I N1 I N 1 1 ` 1 E i i! A _ i � Illi iE , I SIt i � fI Ei E i Ao ! E IE I ! I i EIEI E C :fi'3t 2R'2� 3e 2E 2F 2E 2R �'2R t 3� 2F 2E 2C JF a2 a: X X X 2E X 2e'2R 2F Je'3F'X a2 12R, a X X N dC 2e 2R 2Y X moo oQe.aNmn mm i o iN NOQ,° �oommmm ..;ooQN,,.o C, ,D! O'10 m'm N O:rlfQ nlm co m T n•m'Io NtVI m'In m[m In ll1 Y1•m p{In m n.W N,m NEu1 ,A1V O 10,ID Vt m m m O n N Ofti nim .-Ilm m`.i e N ,niW 01101E.Hlo N m lD elln,.II,-I ul p m1 m1 f0'r1ENm;m .-I W� N Io1Q N�,-I QI10 101N N In .w uli MiNlUI n n V1 nI N�N •° e n n 1D ID N T; m n,NiVl N'.y H e rei O,N,I�aV n rl a .-1 EO 10 I iQ i i N 1 { NI Ns"li �I I I`I V1 N COL a E f x 1 � O1N 010 4-1 .-C *0 l0 10 1 �101!ae O aOe Oa° Oae Ox Oae MI ae ae E ae Ex z Ox 0ae 0ae xN a.ye Z r E I coo•W O O W I In v 0 .y t o n w a0 o m,n N,0 o,n 0 n�m .y'01�,-I c m o E n.m E m .-I i In v1 m m 110 n m 1.� < .ti .�i 11n W m F,10 m j. C n T i S N Ia f 1 .-1• to ID N1 .ti V1` E!N n• 10 C . E c tll E gig i; ry x X,X ��R�� N'��E32'2R 1�j2 2C•�F 2R 2e�at.$f �c'2ti 2R'.2E 2F�2tT2R'aC aR�� 2R�g lA N V1 u1 im ` EQINI~ ei,NIN N NI T10 TN !Om,O ,-1, 11D V7 m S ! _1 d N o!m W1m m'O W110 1n 0 cc O'N T .+ 6'0 po� 1oEm 4p o olvlEo pp .+'l° n 10 y� .+ o N a n O N N, '00SO 1D So 10 l0 T N m m i EI ! •O�u1! 'O O!N N rl m T•e oEN Q m1 jm10 O,In 1 0 aq rti f i,-i of I o .tit j 'ti; i ~ o I 10 1 m m m d , gig 9 Y. 2e 9 9 X'X � X X'X X`22'�E 22'2R:2C 2R 2E aR X X X X � X�2e 2R 2e X'X 2pYX X'X bC'X 2R y� W N ID 1p N N miin a m 0 nii to r m U " n 1olm In WInIIIo minlIn In�m Inin n,ablul n W m n n m IOlm W 10 ul vl�m Q 10110 m,m m min ,o n c 3 illi li � EE E II � j � x d I t I o'm elm ,nl n a, a tm m WIN 10 In 10 e m N{r., a m m o mto m I o m n o 10 1n m 1n n o m.,n In 10 T n m U1 m Vl{E 1n IG O m pp m o n �p ,i p o W N O N m I!1 N W Tfi� n# 10 W Nlm m Q m W:nEW I�Er�O,m I11�V1 rl=m ti 1n 0�0 f'�IE VI ul r,m n N C' N N n T7,-1 ,ti H N Q collo m e Qin W 1010 .-iIN W 10 n=In Ins--i u1 O N N N[m O n m: N H Qc ,n En im m ,y .tiE In NE.-I�10 ml�"'NI �"i I E m ,n e�.y vim I I` t t 3 L d 1CI 1a b m m ✓tV O irl m Q u1 1n'1tl m'n'L m .-I O m m W o ei l0 1f} m m aC1. nl,n I�E1gEn o0 a�EW cola? Ill InE01 Q ,n yr n ir1fQ lalm niW vElnotm .s11n 1a .� m Q nEa n O m ry N N NtN N NSIV N NiN fV N N N NiN N N N.N tV�N fVIN fY N N N f'IIIN N ry.,-1 IYf !V N NiN N � I 3 m'a T N 40 m 1p Q W o y T N VI Ill O m nEella ,n n N e r n:V1 a M•In'n 0 0 m'm N O r In T n N m Wf,i 1ppp NI O m 1D!In In Vt 10 N,m,1n n IO 111 m O m n ,, 10 In u I/lSm IO nINle T n In 9 m N .IE10 IO m'{p�1� .-ISO nE1n ID nJ. u1i lV1 ,-It.-I 10 .-I m o N m m Q V1 ul W�m ON 0i ,ylr1 n e o rl C as vi .-i 1d 06 .-i n .-i �i e a 06111 rri Io•vi od .+ of rri v r`i N if1 ri v a6 c 1 0; v d.-i v•ri v .i of to L N Ill H ,-11 .-I m 1-I a 1n N T N I .-ISN ul m i i E f ITE W E m m m N m mi.-I m OEm 0 1n T m e H Nsn In n W N 10 Q Le" N N n n vl H .-1 p.p c'0 N m N O,m .-I pp W n,o N m In PIA n .i m'm m a N n'00 H'lmn ° N V II O T o n m N m OE Ia 10,m of 10 niN T N n!Q C T n m e O ri m m .41 re ,111 1p'F,vf In T e r .-i 1p IO r p m N f W pp ut I ni l 0 ti i rl m !f� a m n } n In H T .-1 E m m "IN N co l rl N N -1 10 m %01] ul .-I N .-1! � N 0,O a 3 Vn ° uy aY y A e N n c m g n r 0 — C x �'p s A 1Q w e c A o c ^C$ y y b m c o G OW 1� L YL C S 2 CY C s Y n N 9, 1 C a e 1qp D ' e ° a � YY acs 2 � � zz Z L cc �i Lil s nH 3 `0 a R Q m f0 m m U V O W Ir '� 4 D c 'S It e o ba $ a $ a $ a 'sa c `o 'ba a s `a a S 161 a $ 16 Is a15 a 'a `o c a v a � u g 7 'u r tr iS u v u u u u 47 0 � ij 0 u 'u v 0 u 0 1:j u u 13 7 0 s v v u v � v 3 u m Y Q c d E t m m Q = minie;mi�ie'mimimimEole .ti m=Nimim[m N nimiry iN m .� v1 mmrylm'.+ _ .r,N M �n m .+ N �nilN �n u N N•T eJ,N N NlE�EEN.m NCm m n f4 -CT ri'clmiv€!to..l� ry rIm m � ° . W ` 7K`a:'aR'ae aR`ae aR ati'aR a� ae•ae aF aE 2p ae'ae,aR X i aE,aR,aE f ae,ae aE ae ae ae'ae ae•aR t 2P aR,2E i 2R 2p°2R 3e 2R 3: 2R 10 oj�nErE�i�eie mErvi�oEry �oEm �n m m main Vtejni�n•�oim .n=min W:l N .�i.y i I.y .-. N i.� .r I.� .�1 .•i .� N .�F.� ti .i .� .�S.ti i.i .•i i.� .ti .r .� .� .� N ! i i I m a 12` ae SaR 2R aC aR �R �R I EEXr3:'�p 2` 2e'y;'-e a'P[�R g1g!g -* a` ae aF �R[�p 2: 9 nl i,••I 'm '•I ul�m Vl gni C']'ZT�N'A ligj `cot lrvl us F^m N'b inl m'VEm vlin m u1 b•FiV b `p V M T}}IM N:M V m•N{N m N m e V MImIQim:M N;Mim M NEN TEv N miNiv mfM T N e m T M T i i i t ' i 13 iE I i 71 aRI R aR aF YFCX X 2e X aF Xi R Xi2Ci2R'aE•aFiac 2R lartt2e 2 *19 at 3er2F32F'2eI�72FI39 *Ig ZR 2e 2R Xe p19 2F ` Ln lm m m r'o V o .+ N mi n;coEeir;o,Niry m m n m o .+xM � m'lOi colo o N�O mimlN w N i M N N rl N rl N N N N N M N N N H N N N N N'N e rl N n H .••i,.•/,N ti E i i I i o m .i N coim In mirio colo I- m m r,N Ln .n .�•m:inla In m m o almt N:�nim a...... c co m m s .�I.+ a m %a C) co m M r n m o V,ry n coin m e Lnirvi.� o n�.-, .tido .y .i{ m[Ntm m n o m T m 0 .+ �o N °� e o .n a cojf,o m$�o �o of m N �e r:m 6 Vi i fV m N N lG I .•i T m m-f N OI i ri rl E a€ frf Q m I w ri R1 ti .i ili ao .•i[ I is n LL ae 2R 2f 2R,2'R7'g2j*l g 2R 2R�a2 �E 2C �t 3e aR 1� 2R i 2°122 2R 2" 2e 2R 2e i 2e l 3e i of i 3E i 2R i 2F 2R 2C 12C 1 2e 2°I� c m .r N1n n o co n co v coif c m'm cn N N n H n'T'io' NILn,M Ln m mI. �'$� 2 u 'n m!w cc Ln inim roe n n a r�I- rir n m to Go Lniex�Em!soil co nli!fnp n H n i I l f E ot m7ml,ylmi�nl 1 1e co m mi,n[Ni,y��pi,y mt,ci� mlm .+ w n miv�i'-'ico�o nj 11 .ti g e m m ry m rv'T•n �e}m vni .Nirm b c ii �E oo mine al *igEo g e ml�lmfo �nin m�m . ;^iim co m m o coENE^ gy=m °� i u! e m 0 N 2 u '�i tc ti m i ai ui r'I N v �e 1 m m ri b e.i o G 1^�f ri tO 'D in ui r+i ri id m E 9S i `r[ I p I ap+i o 0 W 'Ea e n !N N! i N ei= e N.eia Vl 1Di.y IENi °rl hm�VlV`i O`m 3 x a aR 2R 2e, 3e a°ta� df ��RR ar ae ae 2R k ae,aF ,ap; X•ae aF 2R X,2R,aE X, X ae ac 2R X aR ✓1.N n do+n N oo .i m co co F:�n �o m min aSc m co a e m .e 'b'm �n m .r m ar N'N eiiN N H NI ••Y N iti 1 ; ey N H irl irl N i E c x 15 a i .o a'm �p M N'O n �Q M r N i N N m.N i c r N T ul n l0 O ,••� r c m �o ain m.Ory r .i Tm arou� °� ,ym mTEinl �in mi'� °� �oN sill In i .•i� cm 0 �O�Vt a '"� O 10 ,••I -lin Q IriVt V N m!e In � < N 1/7 n _ Oe �.y u1� .-i�� m .-i O 10S i.•i 1 R.-i V � Niui au-i Ii njp c. Ll_ ar ae ae ae•ae x E ae x i ae aR x ae aR aR = T co .•� in N n to MEV m co;m m co m a jin �o �n .o colic aJv in`.� �n;mLn m a m r �n m .nE.+leiV��o m m f 11 a co V �o .+[e r ml.rim ppSry r'm a N Q .o fn N N n'n pp``.� Q n m co;m ti ✓1'T'n tD'vl V u1 .H e g m T ul o m Oim u7`m O•m �D,N O - of n O O� 01 Vim r o .ti m lD ,m N 1. 1E en: N r1 e O n r E m O N m'N 111i T�10 r ul VI V l0 m n N e l0 .y .O l0 S N fM1 i••I N i n .••I c 1� r N [ u.H IqCL ai X aae aR;ik aR a �p; aaaR aea: aeaR aR XaF X ae X`az ac aR ar at aF aR i 3R aR?: X I aem e .ti N �o l e o 0 o r m .ti �o n N .� n N N .y i.� .ti .-i .r .y �n N n .r r N E m o� ao E o Z7 m m I m ^� n V w o•,y o o oim , 'lm a N .ti r �n a r•o .�'m 'm r'm wil N ,-i n Zn �n'N o m N n a o ro w N n in [ �n 6 ui .� m m o E m N �n �o of .•. S co n m o c mmN .o;N e� .r .+ Lnm �i mm o `.�•S co m r m m ni �•.y a E i �i� io m .+ � rvi r 10 I n m �° ` m I a) x U o Y Q o v a ❑ — c x a c n c y m c £ £ } N a n ¢ c ro 50 a T o m v N c c re a .` # c E m m d g o f u U u ❑ ❑ d Y Y Y 2 x to 0 v u r u 0 v v 'u u v u 'u E3 iu i- u u` u u u i7 v iu 'u` v 'u O G i} "u' � u i3 ❑ � 'u i3 i7 !� � 7 a « 0 u m c Y Attachment A Appendix B: Housing Discrimination Testing Final Report �A 1 R 11" 0 L 1 N CENTER OF WASHINGTON Embracing - Advocating Equality Final Testing Report for King County This document is a summary report of the Fair Housing Center of Washington's results of the contract. A spreadsheet with the total number of tests completed, the name, city and subregion of the test site, protected classes tested, type of test(policy, differential treatment), and test results is included in the final report packet. As of May 31,2019,the Fair Housing Center of Washington completed eighty-two(82)tests,of which forty-three (43)were negative and thirty-nine (39)were positive. The violations observed during this contract were either differential treatment based on a protected class status or discriminatory policies that placed additional barriers to housing due to a person's inclusion in a protected class. For tests indicating differential treatment violations, the FHCW recommends additional testing to determine if there is a pattern of differential treatment based on a protected class. For tests indicating one or more discriminatory policies, the FHCW recommends a technical letter advising the test site to correct their policies so that they adhere to fair housing laws. For either type of fair housing violation, the FHCW may pursue enforcement of fair housing laws if a pattern of discrimination is determined. Of the thirty-nine (39) positive tests, thirty-two (32) had recommendations for additional testing for differential treatment based on a protected class. Row Labels Negative Positive Grand Total No further action recommended 43 0 43 Additional testing recommended 0 32 32 Technical letter recommended 0 7 7 Grand Total 43 39 82 As of May 31,2019,the Fair Housing Center of Washington completed sixteen(16)policy check tests, of which seven (7)were conducted in the North/East subregion and nine(9)were conducted in the South subregion of King County. Subregion Negative Positive Grand Total North/East 4 3 7 South 5 4 9 Grand Total 9 7 16 Of the sixteen (16) policy check tests, four (4) tested for willingness to grant reasonable accommodations to persons with a disability, and eleven (11) tested for willingness to accept alternative sources of income, including housing vouchers(Section 8)and maternity leave. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 80 Attachment A Protected Basis j Negative Positive Grand Total Reasonable Accommodations 1 3 4 Source of Income—Housing Voucher 5 4 9 Source of Income—Maternity Leave 2 0 2 Income& Reasonable Accommodation 1 0 1 Grand Total 9 7 16 As of May 31,2019,the Fair Housing Center of Washington completed sixty-six(66)differential treatment tests, of which thirty-four (34)were conducted in the North/East subregion and thirty-two (32)were conducted in the South subregion of King County. Negative Positive Grand Total North/East 16 18 34 South 18 14 32 Grand Total 34 f 32 66 Of the thirty-four (34) differential treatment tests conducted in the North/East subregion, sixteen (16) were negative and eighteen (18)were positive, including: North/East Negative Positive Grand Total Disability 7 5 12 Familial Status 2 3 5 National Origin 1 2 3 Race 4 4 8 Religion 2 4 6 Grand Total 16 18 34 Of the thirty-two(32)differential treatment tests conducted in the South subregion,fourteen (14)were positive, including: South Negative Positive Grand Total Disability 1 1 Familial Status 6 3 9 National Origin 5 6 11 Race 1 3 4 Religion 5 2 7 Grand Total l 18 14 32 Of the sixty-six (66) differential treatment tests conducted, fourteen (14) were conducted via email, twenty-one(21)were conducted via phone calls, and thirty-one(31)were conducted via site visits. Contact Type Negative I Positive Grand Total Email 7 7 14 Phone 12 9 21 King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 81 Attachment A Site 15 16 31 Grand Total 34 3266 Of the thirty-one(31)site differential treatment tests, five (5)tests were conducted in Auburn, six (6)were conducted in Bellevue, one (1)was conducted in Burien, five(5)were conducted in Federal Way,five(5)were conducted in Kent, and one(1)was conducted in Renton. City Negative Positive Grand Total Auburn 2 3 5 Bellevue 3 3 6 Burien 0 1 1 Federal Way 2 3 5 Kent 4 1 5 Renton 0 1 1 Of the five(5)site, differential treatment tests conducted in Kent, one(1)was based on disability, one (1) was based on familial status, one (1) was based on national origin, one (1) was based on race, and one(1)was based on religion. Protected Basis Negative Positive Grand Total Kent Disability 1 0 1 Familial Status 1 0 1 National Origin 0 1 1 Race 1 0 1 Religion 1 0 1 Grand Total 4 1 5 In sum, the Fair Housing Center of Washington observed thirty-nine(39) positive violations of Fair Housing law throughout King County during the contract period. Additional testing as well as sending of technical letters are both recommended to 1)further identify potentially systemic barriers to fair housing, 2)make violators aware of their actions and 3)bring said violators into compliance with Fair Housing law. In addition, increased fair housing education, including annual fair housing training throughout the county may help to combat instances of discrimination, for both new and seasoned property managers, leasing agents and other actors in the housing space. King County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 82 ...............�� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM i CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE:ENCOURAGING INVESTMENTS IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING THROUGH SALES AND USE TAX IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF 2019,CHAPTER 338(SHB 1406) POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council impose a sales and use tax for affordable and supportive housing in accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338? COMMITTEE: Parks,Recreation,Human Services, &Public Safety MEETING DATE: October 8,2019 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ® Ordinance ® Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Sarah Bridgeford DEPT: CD/CS Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance Options Presented: 1. Approve the proposed ordinance. 2. Do not approve the proposed ordinance and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: r. 61 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: cUi MC .4�n �1t1t18�atC Initial-Date Inilial; arc COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on October 15, 2019." orrunittee Chair Committee Member ConAffee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE (OCTOBER 15, 2019): "1 move to forward approval of the proposed ordinance to the November 5, 2019 Council Meetingfor enactment." SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE(NOVEMBER 5,2019): "I move approval of the proposed ordinance." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: l ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# �C ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# Iters 6c — Ordinance: Encouraging Investments in Affordable Housing and Supporting Housing through Sales Tax in Accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (SHB 1406) See Agenda Item 8a for supporting documents. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 2019 ITEM#: 7a ... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council appoint members to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee? COMMITTEE:N/A MEETING DATE:N/A CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Stephanie Courtney, Cit Clerk DEPT: Mayor's Office ---- y - Background: The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) is comprised of a minimum of five (5) members who serve two-year terms. Per FWRC 2.75.020, members must represent businesses that are required to collect lodging tax or businesses authorized to be funded by lodging tax revenues (a minimum of two each). Three (3) positions representing businesses collecting and one (1) position representing businesses funded by lodging tax are due to expire 10/31/2019. Four (4) applications have been received, three which are current members seeking re-appointment. At their October 15, 2019 Special Meeting the City Council interviewed the new applicant seeking appointment (Vickie Molzer) and three seeking re-appointment (Mike Dunwiddie,Madalena Miller, and Jessica Christensen). Options Considered: 1. Appoint the following candidates to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee with terms expiring as follows: 1. Voting Member Expires 10/31/2021 2. Voting Member Expires 10/31/2021 3. Voting Member Expires 10/31/2021 4, Voting Member Expires 10/31/2021 2. Direct the City Clerk to advertise for additional applicants for the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A J0 e7 CITY CLERK APPROVAL: p CommitteeCOACH Uv[in I7.i14 Initial/Date Initial/Date PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move the appointment Of as a voting members of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee with terms to expire October 31, 2021. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances onl)) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 2019ITEM#: 7b ......................................... ........... .... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council appoint a new member to the Arts Commission? COMMITTEE:N/A MEETING DATE: N/A CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Stephanie Courtne Cit Clerk DEPT: Mayor's Office Background: The Arts Commission is comprised of nine (9) voting and two (2) alternate members who are appointed by the City Council to serve three-year terms (per FWRC 2.50.030). There are currently two(2)vacant alternate positions due to term expirations. One(1) application was received in response to the City Clerk's recruitment process. At their October 15, 2019 Special Meeting the City Council interviewed one (1) applicant seeking appointment to this commission(Kenny Byrne). Options Considered: 1. Appoint Kenny Byrne as an alternate member of the Arts Commission with a term to expire 12/31/2020. 2. Direct the City Clerk to advertise for additional applicants for the Arts Commission. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A 1j CITY CLERK APPROVAL: Committeenvme' itia Dat I Initial/Date Initial/Date PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move the appointment of Kenny Byrne as an alternate member of the Arts Commission with a term to expire 12/31/2020" (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances onh) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# ., -- ......... — COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15, 2019 ITEM#: 7c ............... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CANCELLATION OF THE DECEMBER 17,2019 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council suspend the Council Rules of Procedure and cancel their December 17, 2019 Regular Meeting? COMMITTEE:N/A MEETING DATE: N/A CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Stephanie Courtney, City Clerk DEPT: Mayor's Office Background: Historically the City Council has cancelled the second Regular Meeting each December to allow for holiday vacations for Councilmembers and staff. Section 2.1(1) of the Council Rules of Procedure states the City Council will conduct Regular Meetings the first and third Tuesday of each month. Section 23.1 of the Council Rules of Procedure states any provision of the rules not governed by law or ordinance may be suspended by a two-thirds (2/3)vote of the Council. Options Considered: 1. Cancel the December 17, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting. 2. Conduct the December 17, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1 MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A blyD111 CITY CLERK APPROVAL: (� D Committee Can it Emtia Dat Initial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A N/A N/A N/A Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to suspend the Council Rules of Procedure 2.1(1) and to cancel the December 17, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#:� CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING THE PREKEGES LAWSUIT. POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council approve the proposed settlement agreement regarding the Prekeges lawsuit? COMMITTEE: N/A MEETING DATE:N/A CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: J. Ryan Call, City Attorney DEPT: Law Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: 1. Approve the agreed upon settlement in the matter of Prekeges vs. Johnson, City of Federal Way,et.al. 2.Refuse the Proposed settlement androp vide staff with directions. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: N/A III-,- DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �F'rCc (VI q 114 Committee t:o'LI Initial/Date Initial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of the proposed settlement in the matter of Prekeges vs. Johnson, City of Federal Way, et al in the amount of$27,500. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: City Council Members VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Ryan Call, City Attorney Eric Rhoades, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Prekeges Settlement Agreement Financial Impacts: The City will pay $27,500 for general and special damages from its Risk Managements Funds in exchange for a Release of All Claims against Officer David Johnson and the City. Background Information: In December 2018, Mr Prekeges served a lawsuit upon the City and Officer Johnson for personal injuries, and pain and suffering as a result of an chain reaction auto collision with Officer Johnson on November 27, 2015. Officer Johnson was returning from an extra duty assignment in heavy traffic in Seattle;as he entered the on-ramp to WB SR 520, two vehicles in front of him came to a sudden stop. Officer Johnson was not able to come to a complete stop in time to avoid a collision, colliding with Whatamores' vehicle who was then pushed into the vehicle where Mr. Prekeges was a passenger in the front seat. The parties agreed to a settlement subject to Council approval of$27,500. Rev.7/18 RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS JAMES PREKEGES vs. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.; CHERI OSBORN; BLESSINGS ON WHEELS, INC.; DAVID JOHNSON; and the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY JAMES PREKEGES, herein "the Undersigned," hereby acknowledges receipt of FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($55,000.00), which sum is accepted in full compromise settlement and satisfaction of, and as sole consideration for, the final release and discharge of all actions, claims and demands whatsoever, that now exist, or that may hereafter accrue, against FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC. (including its agents and/or representatives; and any other person, corporation, association or partnership) (hereinafter "FXG"); BLESSINGS ON WHEELS, INC. (including its agents and/or representatives; and any other person, corporation, association or partnership); CHERI OSBORN and her spouse, if any; DAVID JOHNSON and his spouse, if any; and the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY (including its agents and/or representatives; and any other person, corporation, association or partnership) (hereafter Releasees) charged with the alleged responsibility for the injuries suffered by JAMES PREKEGES as a result of two incidenta that occurred on or about November 27, 2015 and June 6, 2017, both in King County, Washington, for which the Undersigned claims some or all of the above-named persons or parties are legally liable in damages; which damages are disputed and denied, and is the subject of the lawsuit presently styled JAMES PREKEGES v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.; et al., Superior Court of King County Washington, Case No. 18-2-55362-8 SEA and; The Undersigned warrants that no promise or inducement has been offered except as herein set forth; that this Release is executed without reliance upon any statement or representation by the persons or parties released, or their representatives, or physicians concerning the nature and extent of the injuries and/or damages and/or legal liability therefore; that the Undersigned is of legal age, legally competent to execute this Release and accepts full responsibility therefore, and; furthermore, it is agreed that the Undersigned will reimburse any lienholder, known or unknown, for any liens as a result of the above incident; The Undersigned agrees, as a further consideration and inducement for this compromise settlement, that he shall apply to all unknown and unanticipated injuries and damages resulting from said accident, casualty or event, as well as to those now disclosed, and; The Release expressly reserves all rights of the parties released to pursue their legal remedies, if any, against the Undersigned, their heirs, executors, agents and assigns. The Release shall operate as and shall be a complete accord and satisfaction and is a full acquittance in consideration of a full and complete settlement of any and all claims for damages and injuries of every kind, character, or description sustained by the Undersigned, whether herein Page 1 of 3 specifically described or not, which the Undersigned may have now or hereafter have on account of or in any way connected with the above described occurrence as against Releasees. By executing this Release the Undersigned does covenant to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Releasees from any and all claims for liability from any medical care provider whatsoever, or dispenser and/or supplier of any medical services as a result of their treatment or care rendered, or for any lien asserted by, for, or on behalf of any attorney, representative, plan, or insurer, Medicaid, private health care insurer or plan, or any other contractual, statutory, or governmental lien holder relative to any care, services or treatment rendered or offered herein and for which demand could be made upon Releasees for discharge or payment by statute, contract, rule, or regulation. The Undersigned agrees and warrants that he is not a Medicare beneficiary. In any event, the Undersigned agrees to indemnify and/or hold harmless and defend Releasees from any cause of action, including, but not limited to any loss of Medicare or Social Security benefits, or any recovery the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may pursue, including for any recovery sought by Medicare for past, present and future liens. The Undersigned also agrees to release any right to bring any possible future action under the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute (MSP) against Releasees. Should Medicare require that it be reimbursed for any past medical expenses which it has paid for the Undersigned's medical treatment which is related to the claim- related injury, the Undersigned agrees to be solely responsible for the same. Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel understand and agree that it is a material condition of payment of the monies referenced above that Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel maintain absolute confidentiality of this settlement and, further, they specifically agree that neither the nature of this settlement nor the amount of the settlement shall be disclosed, communicated, publicized, or discussed with any person in any manner whatsoever (except for such communications as may be reasonably necessary with legal, tax and accounting advisors and as necessary to comply with legal requirements such as an order of a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction). If this covenant or confidentiality is breached, Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel agree that harm will be caused to the Releasees. Payment of the above amount is for settlement of a disputed claim and is not an admission of liability or negligence. Payment of the above amount is not an admission against interest. This release shall not be construed as a determination of the negligence or freedom from negligence of any party or parties. The Undersigned agrees that this Release of All Claims is fair, is knowingly and voluntarily made, and forever ends the Undersigned's rights to make any claims against Releasees related to this incident. This Release of All Claims contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto. Page 2 of 3 I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THIS RELEASE. Signed on of-- , 2019. JAMES PREKEGES Page 3 of 3 ........ ..._.......................... . .._._............. —KC.� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 15,2019 ITEM#• CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE:ENCOURAGING INVESTMENTS IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING THROUGH SALES AND USE TAX IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF 2019,CHAPTER 338(SHB 1406) POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council impose a sales and use tax for affordable and supportive housing in accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338? COMMITTEE: Parks,Recreation,Human Services, &Public Safety MEETING DATE: October 8, 2019 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ® Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Sarah Bridg eford DEPT: CD/CS Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance Options Presented: 1. Approve the proposed ordinance. 2. Do not approve the proposed ordinance and provide direction to staff. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: let DIRECTOR APPROVAL: �q Ca ttsa c oui,c ]nitiauMic InitiaUl7atc lnida6 au COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on October 15, 2019." oilmilttee Chair Coma-littee Member Con tee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE (OCTOBER 15, 2019): "I move to forward approval of the proposed ordinance to the November S, 2019 Council Meetingfor enactment." SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE(NOVEMBER 5,2019): "1 move approval of the proposed ordinance." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED EFERRED I /D /NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED- 4/2019 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: October 15, 2019 TO: City Council Members VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Sarah Bridgeford, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: ORDINANCE: Encouraging Investments in Affordable Housing and Supportive Housing through Sales and Use Tax in accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (SHB 1406) The proposed ordinance follows the"Resolution: Encouraging Investments in Affordable Housing and Supportive Housing through Sales and Use Tax in accordance with Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 (SHB 1406)". Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 requires a city adopting the sales and use tax for the purpose of affordable housing and supportive housing to pass a resolution of intent and an ordinance imposing the sales and use tax. This staff report contains the same information as for the resolution. Financial Impacts: Adopting the sales and use tax allowed by Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 —Affordable and supportive housing—local sales and use tax(Substitute House Bill 1406)will add a revenue source dedicated to addressing affordable and supportive housing needs in the City. The adopted sales and use tax will be deducted from the existing sales tax so that there will not be an increase in sales and use taxes. Background Information: On July 2, 2019, Community Services Manager Sarah Bridgeford provided the Council with an update on Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 and recommended moving forward with a resolution of intent and subsequent ordinance in the fall. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the program and request that Council pass a resolution of intent to participate in the program. Rev.7/18 Laws of 2019, Chapter 338. Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 was enacted in 2019 to encourage investments in affordable housing and/or supportive housing. The revenue sharing program does not increase sales tax, but instead allows for the City of Federal way to recapture a portion of the existing sales tax to use it in the following ways: • Acquiring, rehabilitating, or constructing affordable housing; • Funding operations and maintenance costs of new units; or • For cities with populations fewer than 100,000, provide rental assistance. The revenue will be capped based on fiscal year 2019, which ended on June 30, 2019. The estimates based on 2018 sales tax would provide $124,142 to Federal Way for eligible uses. The bill includes the ability for cities to recapture a larger portion of the sales tax (0.0146%) if the City has implemented a qualifying local tax; otherwise the second 0.0073%will be available to King County, which has passed a resolution of intent and ordinance implementing the tax on August 28, 2019. Qualifying taxes. There are four qualifying taxes to access a larger portion of the sales tax recapture provided in Laws of 2019, Chapter 338. The City of Federal Way is not authorized to impose the tax provided by RCW 82.14.460 as King County has already imposed the tax. Two of the taxes are property taxes allowed by RCW 84.52.105 and RCW 84.55.050. The final option is a sales tax increase of 1/10 of I%to be used for affordable housing as permitted by RCW 82.14.530. At this time, a qualifying tax is not being recommended. Resolution of intent. Laws of 2019, Chapter 338 went into effect on July 28, 2019. To participate, the City must pass a resolution of intent within six months of the effective date. Length of time. The tax may be in place for up to 20 years. Pooling of funds with South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP). There is discussion among SKHHP participants and tentative agreement that pooling of funds will provide the most effective means by which to invest in affordable housing. More information will be provided as SKHHP continues its discussion. Prioritizing use of the funds. Should Council pass the resolution of intent and a subsequent ordinance, staff will prepare policies and recommendation for prioritizing use of the funds for Council consideration. Rev.7/18 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way,Washington, relating to investments in affordable and supportive housing; adding new sections to Chapter 3.35 FWRC. WHEREAS, in the 2019 Regular Session,the Washington State Legislature approved, and the Governor signed, Chapter 338, Laws of 2019 (Substitute House Bill 1406); and WHEREAS,Chapter 338,Laws of 2019 authorizes the governing body of a city or county to impose a local sales and use tax for the acquiring,rehabilitating,or constructing affordable housing, including facilities providing supportive housing services, and for the operations and maintenance costs of affordable or supportive housing, or, if eligible, for providing rental assistance to tenants; and WHEREAS, the tax will be deducted from the amount of tax otherwise required to be collected within the City and, therefore,will not result in higher sales and use taxes within the City and will represent an additional revenue dedicated to addressing housing needs in the City; and WHEREAS,the tax must be used to assist persons whose income is at or below sixty percent of the City's median income; and WHEREAS,the Federal Way City Council determined that imposing the sales and use tax to address this need will benefit its residents and adopted a resolution on October 15,2019, declaring its intent to authorize the maximum capacity of the tax, which meets the statutory requirements to adopt a resolution of intent within six months of the effective date of Laws of 2019, Chapter 338; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Ordinance No. 19- Page 1 of 4 Section 1. Chapter 3.35 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new article and a new section 3.35.100 to read as follows: 3.35.100 Imposition. There is hereby imposed a sales and/or use tax, as the case niay be, upon every taxable event, its defined in Chapter 82.14 RCW as the same exists or may hereafter been amended, which occurs within the city.The tax shall be imposed upon and collected from those persons from whom the state sales and/or use tax is collected pursuant to Chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW.The tax imposed by this section must be deducted from the amount of tax otherwise required to be collected or paid to the Department of Revenue under Chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW. Sect.Ioii 2. Chapter 3.35 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 3.35.110 to read as follows: 3.35.110 Tax Rate. The t,atc� of tax imposed by FWRC 3.35.100 shall be the maxiinum rate permitted under Laws of 2019, Chapter 338. Section 3. Chapter 3.35 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 3.35.120 to read as follows: 3.35.120 Administration—Collection. The administration and collection of the tax imposed by this article shall be in accordance with the provisions of Laws of 2019,Chapter 338,and be accounted lui separatcly by the 1111,,11 ice department. Section 4. Chapter 3.35 of the Federal Way Revised Code is hereby amended to add a new section 3.35.130 to read as follows: Ordinance No. 19- Page 2 of 4 3.35.130 Inspection of records—Agreement with Department of Revenue. Tile citvcoll'� Ws loyinsp«laou of such records_as axe necessary toqualify the city for inspection of records of the Department of Revenue. pursuant to RCW 82.32.330(3)(h). The mayor is authorized to enter into an a Eureement with the Department of Revenue for the administration of the tax. Section 5. Sevcrabiiity. Should any section,subsection,paragraph,sentence,clause,or phrase of this ordinance,or its application to any person or situation,be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses,phrase,or portion thereof,irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. Section 7. Rati fi cation.Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five(5)days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. Ordinance No. 19- Page 3 of 4 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of . 20 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: JIM FERRELL, MAYOR ATTEST: STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. RYAN CALL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 19- Page 4 of 4 COUNCIL MEETINGDATE: October--------1,2019 ITEM#: alb.. . _ .............. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE: PAEC CONSTRUCTION INTERFUND LOAN BONDING POLICY QUESTION: Should the City of Federal Way approve the Ordinance relating to the PAEC Construction Interfund Loan? COMMITTEE: FEDRAC MEETING DATE: 9/24/19 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ® Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Ade Ariwoola DEPT: Finance Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance Options Considered: 1. Approve the proposed ordinance. 2. Do not approve the proposed ordinance. MAYOR'S RECOMMEN TION: Option 1. MAYOR APPROV:1 /IT DIRECTOR APPROVAL: 11 l Cj C41111iI[cc CtlllnGl Initial/Date Initial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward the proposed ordinance to First Reading on October], 2019.. W f o n t E l n;, ''"`- Committee Chair Committee Member Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION(S): FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE(OCTOBER 1,2019): "I move to forward approval of the proposed ordinance to the October 15, 2019 Council Meeting for enactment. " SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE(OCTOBER 15,2019): "I move approval of the proposed ordinance. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# � ❑ DENIED First reading " ❑ "CABLED/DEFERRED/NO AC-TION Enactment reading MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only)1Olo I ORDINANCE# Eti' vISFD--IV2017 RESOLUTION# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: 9/17/19 TO: City Council Members VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Ad6 Ariwoola, Finance Director SUBJECT: PAEC CONSTRUCTION 1NTERFUND LOAN BONDING ORDIANCE Financial Impacts: The financial impact to the City will be an annual debt service amount of about$425,000. The payments will be made by the December 1 st of every year with REET, Utility tax, and general fund money. Background Information: The Council authorized an Interfund loan of up to $13 million for PAEC construction in July of 2014 with Resolution No. 14-667 and the first draw was in 2016. The Interfund load needs to be bonded by December 31, 2019 with an outstanding balance of$6.76 million. The bond will be over a 20 year period with options to call it in 10 years (2029). Mayor's Recommendation: For the above reasons, the Mayor and Staff recommend that Council authorize the bonding of the Interfund Loan. Rev.7/18 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way,Washington, relating to relating to contracting indebtedness;providing for the issuance,sale and delivery of one or more series of not to exceed $7,000,000 aggregate principal amount of limited tax general obligation bonds to provide funds to repay the City's costs of constructing the Performing Arts and Events Center, and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds; fixing or setting parameters with respect to certain terms and covenants of the bonds; appointing the City's designated representative to approve the final terms of the sale of the bonds; and providing for other related matters. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions. As used in this ordinance, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: "Authorized Denomination" means $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof within a maturity of a Series. "Beneficial Owner"means,with respect to a Bond,the owner of any beneficial interest in that Bond. "Bond"means each bond issued pursuant to and for the purposes provided in this ordinance. "Bond Counsel"means the firm of Foster Pepper PLLC,its successor, or any other attorney or firm of attorneys selected by the City with a nationally recognized standing as bond counsel in the field of municipal finance. "Bond Account" means the Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Account, 2019A of the City created for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. "Bond Purchase Contract" means an offer to purchase a Series of the Bonds, setting forth certain terms and conditions of the issuance, sale and delivery of those Bonds,which offer is authorized to Ordinance No. 19- Page I of 22 be accepted by the Designated Representative on behalf of the City,if consistent with this ordinance. "Bond Register" means the books or records maintained by the Bond Registrar for the purpose of identifying ownership of each Bond. "Bond Registrar" means the Fiscal Agent, or any successor bond registrar selected by the City for any Series of Bonds. "City" means the City of Federal Way, Washington, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State. "City Council" means the legislative authority of the City, as duly and regularly constituted from time to time. "Code"means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. "DTC"means The Depository Trust Company,New York,New York, or its nominee. "Designated Representative"means the officer of the City appointed in Section 4 of this ordinance to serve as the City's designated representative in accordance with RCW 39.46.040(2). "Final Terms" means the terms and conditions for the sale of a Series of the Bonds including the amount, date or dates, denominations, interest rate or rates (or mechanism for determining interest rate or rates), whether a Series is federally tax-exempt, payment dates, final maturity, redemption rights, price, and other terms or covenants. "Fiscal Agent"means the fiscal agent of the State,as the same may be designated by the State from time to time. "Government Obligations" has the meaning given in RCW 39.53.010, as now in effect or as may hereafter be amended. Ordinance No. 19- Page 2 of 22 "Issue Date"means,with respect to a Bond,the date of initial issuance and delivery of that Bond to the Purchaser in exchange for the purchase price of that Bond. "Letter of Representations"means the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations between the City and DTC, dated May 1, 1997, as it may be amended from time to time, and any successor or substitute letter relating to the operational procedures of the Securities Depository. "MSRB"means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. "Official Statement" means an offering document, disclosure document, private placement memorandum or substantially similar disclosure document provided to purchasers and potential purchasers in connection with the initial offering of a Series of the Bonds in conformance with Rule 15c2-12 or other applicable regulations of the SEC. "Owner"means, without distinction, the Registered Owner and the Beneficial Owner. "Purchaser" means KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., of Seattle, Washington, or such other corporation, firm, association, partnership, trust, bank, financial institution or other legal entity or group of entities selected by the Designated Representative to serve as purchaser in a private placement, underwriter or placement agent in a negotiated sale of any Series of the Bonds. "Rating Agency" means any nationally recognized rating agency then maintaining a rating on the Bonds at the request of the City. "Record Date"means the Bond Registrar's close of business on the 15th day of the month preceding an interest payment date. With respect to redemption of a Bond prior to its maturity, the Record Date shall mean the Bond Registrar's close of business on the date on which the Bond Registrar sends the notice of redemption in accordance with Section 9. Ordinance No. 19- Page 3 of 22 "Registered Owner"means,with respect to a Bond,the person in whose name that Bond is registered on the Bond Register. For so long as the City utilizes the book-entry only system for the Bonds under the Letter of Representations, Registered Owner shall mean the Securities Depository. "Rule I5c2-12"means Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. "SEC"means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. "Securities Depository" means DTC, any successor thereto, any substitute securities depository selected by the City that is qualified under applicable laws and regulations to provide the services proposed to be provided by it, or the nominee of any of the foregoing. "Series of the Bonds" or"Series"means a series of the Bonds issued pursuant to this ordinance. "State"means the State of Washington. "Term Bond"means each Bond designated as a Term Bond and subject to mandatory redemption in the years and amounts set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract. "Undertaking" means the undertaking to provide continuing disclosure entered into pursuant to Section 16 of this ordinance. Section 2. Findin gs and Determinations.The City takes note of the following facts and makes the following findings and determinations: (a) The Bonds. For the purpose of providing the funds necessary to carry out the repayment of a portion of the costs of the Performing Arts and Events Center and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the Bonds,the City Council finds that it is in the best interests of the City and its taxpayers to issue and sell the Bonds to the Purchaser, pursuant to the terms set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract as approved by the City's Designated Representative consistent with this ordinance. Ordinance No. 19- Page 4 of 22 (b) Debt Capacity. The maximum amount of indebtedness authorized by this ordinance is $7,000,000. Based on the following facts,this amount is to be issued within the amount permitted to be issued by the City for general municipal purposes without a vote: (1) The assessed valuation of the taxable property within the City as ascertained by the last preceding assessment for City purposes for collection in the calendar year 2019 is$11,316,068,196. (2) As of December 31, 2018, the City had limited tax general obligation indebtedness, consisting of bonds, leases and conditional sales contracts outstanding in the principal amount of $31,498,600, which is incurred within the limit of up to 1.5% of the value of the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes without a vote. In addition, pursuant to Ordinance No. 19-868,the Council authorized the City to issue not to exceed$15,000,000 of limited tax general obligation refunding bonds to prepay the City's share of SCORE's bonds. (3)As of December 31, 2018, the City had no outstanding unlimited tax general obligation indebtedness. Section 3. Authorization of Bonds. The City is authorized to borrow money on the credit of the City and issue negotiable limited tax general obligation bonds evidencing indebtedness in one or more Series in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed$7,000,000 to provide funds necessary to pay a portion of the costs of the Performing Arts and Events Center and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the Bonds. Section 4. Descr€i)noii of Roli(Is. Aj)poinwient of Dc5<<�natc•cl FZ,•presow.1€1 c. The City s Finance Director, or the Mayor in his absence,is appointed as the Designated Representative of the City and is authorized and directed to conduct the sale of the Bonds in the manner and upon the Ordinance No. 19- Page 5 of 22 terms deemed most advantageous to the City, and to approve the Final Terms of each Series of the Bonds,with such additional terms and covenants as the Designated Representative deems advisable, within the following parameters: (a)The Bonds maybe issued in one or more Series,and the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds shall not exceed $7,000,000; (b) One or more rates of interest may be fixed for the Bonds as long as no rate of interest for any maturity of the Bonds exceeds 6.00%; (c) The true interest cost to the City for each Series of Bonds does not exceed 5.00%; (d) The aggregate purchase price for each Series of Bonds shall not be less than 95% and not more than 125% of the aggregate stated principal amount of the Bonds, excluding any original issue discount; (e) The Bonds may be issued subject to optional and mandatory redemption provisions; (f)The Bonds shall be dated as of the date of their delivery,which date and time for the issuance and delivery of the Bonds is not later than December 31, 2039; and (g) Each Series shall mature no later than December 31, 2039. In addition,a Series of the Bonds may not be issued if it would cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed the City's legal debt capacity on the Issue Date. The Designated Representative may determine whether it is in the City's best interest to provide for bond insurance or other credit enhancement, may determine whether a Series is federally tax-exempt, and may accept such additional terms,conditions and covenants as he or she may determine are in the best interests of the City, consistent with this ordinance. Ordinance No. 19- Page 6 of'22 In determining the number of series,the series designations,final principal amounts,date of the Bonds, denominations, interest rates,payment dates,redemption provisions and maturity dates for the Bonds,the Designated Representative,in consultation with other City officials and staff and advisors, shall take into account those factors that, in his or her judgment, will result in the lowest true interest cost on the Bonds to their maturity,including,but not limited to current financial market conditions and current interest rates for obligations comparable to the Bonds. Section 5. Bond Registrar: Registration and Transfer of Bonds. (a)Registration ofBonds. Each Bond shall be issued only in registered form as to both principal and interest and the ownership of each Bond shall be recorded on the Bond Register. (b) Bond Registrar; Duties. The Fiscal Agent is appointed as initial Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds,which shall be open to inspection by the City at all times. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City,to authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance,to serve as the City's paying agent for the Bonds and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar's powers and duties under this ordinance. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication on each Bond. The Bond Registrar may become an Owner with the same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar and, to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act as members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect the rights of Owners. (c)Bond Register; Transfer and Exchange. The Bond Register shall contain the name and mailing address of each Registered Owner and the principal amount and number of each Bond held by each Ordinance No. 19- Page 7 of 22 Registered Owner. A Bond surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be exchanged for a Bond or Bonds in any Authorized Denomination of an equal aggregate principal amount and of the same Series, interest rate and maturity. A Bond may be transferred only if endorsed in the manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange or transfer shall be without cost to the Owner or transferee. The Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to exchange any Bond or transfer registered ownership during the period between the applicable Record Date and the next upcoming interest payment or redemption date. (d) Securities Depository; Book-Entry Only Form. If a Bond is to be issued in book-entry form, DTC shall be appointed as initial Securities Depository and each such Bond initially shall be registered in the name of Cede&Co., as the nominee of DTC. Each Bond registered in the name of the Securities Depository shall be held fully immobilized in book-entry only form by the Securities Depository in accordance with the provisions of the Letter of Representations. Registered ownership of any Bond registered in the name of the Securities Depository may not be transferred except: (i)to any successor Securities Depository; (ii) to any substitute Securities Depository appointed by the City; or (iii) to any person if the Bond is no longer to be held in book-entry only form. Upon the resignation of the Securities Depository, or upon a termination of the services of the Securities Depository by the City,the City may appoint a substitute Securities Depository. If(i)the Securities Depository resigns and the City does not appoint a substitute Securities Depository, or(ii)the City terminates the services of the Securities Depository,the Bonds no longer shall be held in book-entry only form and the registered ownership of each Bond may be transferred to any person as provided in this ordinance. Ordinance No. 19- Page 8 of 22 Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any obligation to participants of any Securities Depository or the persons for whom they act as nominees regarding accuracy of any records maintained by the Securities Depository or its participants. Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be responsible for any notice that is permitted or required to be given to a Registered Owner except such notice as is required to be given by the Bond Registrar to the Securities Depository. Section 6. Form and Execution of Bonds. (a)Form of Bonds;Signatures and Seal. Each Bond shall be prepared in a form consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and State law. Each Bond shall be signed by the Mayor and the City Clerk,either or both of whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile,and the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. If any officer whose manual or facsimile signature appears on a Bond ceases to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds before the Bond bearing his or her manual or facsimile signature is authenticated by the Bond Registrar,or issued or delivered by the City,that Bond nevertheless maybe authenticated,issued and delivered and, when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on behalf of the City by any person who, on the actual date of signing of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds,although he or she did not hold the required office on its Issue Date. (b)Authentication. Only a Bond bearing a Certificate of Authentication in substantially the following form,manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance: "Certificate of Authentication. This Bond is one of the fully Ordinance No. 19- Page 9 of 22 registered City of Federal Way, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2019A, described in the Bond Ordinance." The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the benefits of this ordinance. Section 7. Payment of Bonds. Principal of and interest on each Bond shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Principal of and interest on each Bond registered in the name of the Securities Depository is payable in the manner set forth in the Letter of Representations. Interest on each Bond not registered in the name of the Securities Depository is payable by electronic transfer on the interest payment date,or by check or draft of the Bond Registrar mailed on the interest payment date to the Registered Owner at the address appearing on the Bond Register on the Record Date. However, the City is not required to make electronic transfers except pursuant to a request by a Registered Owner in writing received on or prior to the Record Date and at the sole expense of the Registered Owner. Principal of each Bond not registered in the name of the Securities Depository is payable upon presentation and surrender of the Bond by the Registered Owner to the Bond Registrar. The Bonds are not subject to acceleration under any circumstances. Section 8. Bond Account. The Bond Account is created as a special fund of the City for the sole purpose of paying principal of and interest on the Bonds. All amounts allocated to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Bond Account as necessary for the timely payment of amounts due with respect to the Bonds. The principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be paid out of the Bond Account. Until needed for that purpose, the City may invest money in the Bond Account temporarily in any legal investment, and the investment earnings shall be retained in the Bond Account and used for the purposes of that fund. Ordinance No. 19-, Page 10 of 22 Section 9. Redemption Provisions and Purchase of Bonds. (a) Optional Redemption. The Bonds shall be subject to redemption,or prepayment,at the option of the City on terms acceptable to the Designated Representative, as set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract, consistent with the parameters set forth in Section 4. (b) Mandatory Redemption. Each Bond that is designated as a Term Bond in the Bond Purchase Contract,consistent with the parameters set forth in Section 4 and except as set forth below,shall be called for redemption at a price equal to the stated principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued interest,on the dates and in the amounts as set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract. If a Term Bond is redeemed under the optional redemption provisions, defeased or purchased by the City and surrendered for cancellation, the principal amount of the Term Bond so redeemed, defeased or purchased (irrespective of its actual redemption or purchase price) shall be credited against one or more scheduled mandatory redemption installments for that Term Bond. The City shall determine the manner in which the credit is to be allocated and shall notify the Bond Registrar in writing of its allocation prior to the earliest mandatory redemption date for that Term Bond for which notice of redemption has not already been given. (c) Selection of Bonds for Redemption; Partial Redemption. If fewer than all of the outstanding Bonds are to be redeemed at the option of the City,the City shall select the Series and maturities to be redeemed. If fewer than all of the outstanding Bonds of a maturity of a Series are to be redeemed, the Securities Depository shall select Bonds registered in the name of the Securities Depository to be redeemed in accordance with the Letter of Representations, and the Bond Registrar shall select all other Bonds to be redeemed randomly in such manner as the Bond Registrar shall determine. All or a portion of the principal amount of any Bond that is to be redeemed may be redeemed in any Ordinance No. 19- Page 11 of 22 Authorized Denomination. If less than all of the outstanding principal amount of any Bond is redeemed,upon surrender of that Bond to the Bond Registrar,there shall be issued to the Registered Owner, without charge, a new Bond(or Bonds, at the option of the Registered Owner) of the same Series,maturity and interest rate in any Authorized Denomination in the aggregate principal amount to remain outstanding. (d) Notice of Redemption. Notice of redemption of each Bond registered in the name of the Securities Depository shall be given in accordance with the Letter of Representations. Notice of redemption of each other Bond,unless waived by the Registered Owner,shall be given by the Bond Registrar not less than 20 nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption by first-class mail,postage prepaid,to the Registered Owner at the address appearing on the Bond Register on the Record Date. The requirements of the preceding sentence shall be satisfied when notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or not it is actually received by an Owner. In addition, the redemption notice shall be mailed or sent electronically within the same period to the MSRB (if required under the Undertaking), to each Rating Agency, and to such other persons and with such additional information as the Finance Director shall determine, but these additional mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redemption of any Bond. (e)Rescission of Optional Redemption Notice. In the case of an optional redemption, the notice of redemption may state that the City retains the right to rescind the redemption notice and the redemption by giving a notice of rescission to the affected Registered Owners at any time on or prior to the date fixed for redemption. Any notice of optional redemption that is so rescinded shall be of no effect,and each Bond for which a notice of optional redemption has been rescinded shall remain outstanding. Ordinance No. 19- Page 12 of 22 (f)Effect of Redemption. Interest on each Bond called for redemption shall cease to accrue on the date fixed for redemption, unless either the notice of optional redemption is rescinded as set forth above, or money sufficient to effect such redemption is not on deposit in the Bond Account or in a trust account established to refund or defease the Bond. (g)Purchase of Bonds. The City reserves the right to purchase any or all of the Bonds offered to the City at any time at any price acceptable to the City plus accrued interest to the date of purchase. Sectioii 10. Failure to Pay Bonds. If the principal of any Bond is not paid when the Bond is properly presented at its maturity or date fixed for redemption, the City shall be obligated to pay interest on that Bond at the same rate provided in the Bond from and after its maturity or date fixed for redemption until that Bond,both principal and interest,is paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the Bond Account, or in a trust account established to refund or defease the Bond, and the Bond has been called for payment by giving notice of that call to the Registered Owner. Section 11. Pledge of Taxes. The Bonds constitute a general indebtedness of the City and are payable from tax revenues of the City and such other money as is lawfully available,and pledged by the City for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds. For as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding, the City irrevocably pledges that it shall, in the manner provided by law within the constitutional and statutory limitations provided by law without the assent of the voters,include in its annual property tax levy amounts sufficient,together with other money that is lawfully available,to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same become due. The full faith, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds and such pledge shall be enforceable in mandamus against the City. Ordinance No. 19- Page 13 of 22 Section 12. Refundhi,, or Defeasance of the Bonds. The City may issue refunding bonds pursuant to State law or use money available from any other lawful source to carry out a refunding or defeasance plan,which may include(a)paying when due the principal of and interest on any or all of the Bonds(the"defeased Bonds");(b)redeeming the defeased Bonds prior to their maturity;and(c) paying the costs of the refunding or defeasance. If the City sets aside in a special trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemption or defeasance(the"trust account"),money and/or Government Obligations maturing at a time or times and bearing interest in amounts sufficient to redeem, refund or defease the defeased Bonds in accordance with their terms,then all right and interest of the Owners of the defeased Bonds in the covenants of this ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the defeased Bonds shall cease and become void. Thereafter,the Owners of defeased Bonds shall have the right to receive payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds solely from the trust account and the defeased Bonds shall be deemed no longer outstanding. In that event, the City may apply money remaining in any fund or account (other than the trust account) established for the payment or redemption of the defeased Bonds to any lawful purpose. Unless otherwise specified by the City in a refunding or defeasance plan,notice of refunding or defeasance shall be given,and selection of Bonds for any partial refunding or defeasance shall be conducted, in the manner prescribed in this ordinance for the redemption of Bonds. Section 13. Use of Bond Proceeds. On the Issue Date, all or a portion of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds shall be deposited into the Fund and used to repay costs of constructing the Performing Arts and Events Center and paying costs of issuance of the Bonds. Ordinance No. 19- Page 14 of'22 Section 14. Sale and Delivery of the Bonds. (a)Manner of Sale of Bonds;Delivery ofBonds. The Designated Representative is authorized to sell each Series of the Bonds by negotiated sale or private placement, based on the assessment of the Designated Representative of market conditions,in consultation with appropriate City officials and staff,Bond Counsel and other advisors. In determining the method of sale of a Series and accepting the Final Terms, the Designated Representative shall take into account those factors that, in the judgment of the Designated Representative,may be expected to result in the lowest true interest cost to the City. (b) Procedure for Negotiated Sale or Private Placement. If the Designated Representative determines that a Series of the Bonds is to be sold by negotiated sale or private placement, the Designated Representative shall select one or more Purchasers with which to negotiate such sale. The Bond Purchase Contract for each Series of the Bonds shall set forth the Final Terms. The Designated Representative is authorized to execute the Bond Purchase Contract on behalf of the City, so long as the terms provided therein are consistent with the terms of this ordinance. (c)Preparation, Execution and Delivery of the Bonds. The Bonds will be prepared at City expense and will be delivered to the Purchaser in accordance with the Bond Purchase Contract,together with the approving legal opinion of Bond Counsel regarding the Bonds. Section 15. Official Statement. (a)Preliminary Of Statement Deemed Final. The Designated Representative shall review and, if acceptable to her or him, approve the preliminary Official Statement prepared in connection with each sale of a Series of the Bonds to the public or through a Purchaser as a placement agent. For the sole purpose of the Purchaser's compliance with paragraph(b)(1)of Rule 15c2-12,if applicable,the Ordinance No. 19- Page 15 of 22 Designated Representative is authorized to deem that preliminary Official Statement final as of its date, except for the omission of information permitted to be omitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City approves the distribution to potential purchasers of the Bonds of a preliminary Official Statement that has been approved by the Designated Representative and been deemed final, if applicable, in accordance with this subsection. (b) Approval of Final Official Statement. The City approves the preparation of a final Official Statement for each Series of the Bonds to be sold to the public in the form of the preliminary Official Statement that has been approved and deemed final in accordance with subsection (a), with such modifications and amendments as the Designated Representative deems necessary or desirable,and further authorizes the Designated Representative to execute and deliver such final Official Statement to the Purchaser if required under Rule 15c2-12. The City authorizes and approves the distribution by the Purchaser of the final Official Statement so executed and delivered to purchasers and potential purchasers of a Series of the Bonds. Section 16. Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure. If necessary to meet the requirements of paragraph(b)(5)of Rule 15c2-12,as applicable to aparticipating underwriter forthe Bonds, the City makes the following written undertaking (the "Undertaking") for the benefit of holders of the Bonds: (a) Undertaking to Provide Annual Financial Information and Notice of Listed Events. The City undertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either directly or through a designated agent, to the MSRB,in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB,accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB: Ordinance No. 19- Page 16 of 22 (1)Annual financial information and operating data of the type included in the final official statement for the Bonds and described in paragraph (b) ("annual financial information"); (2)Timely notice(not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event)of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds: (A) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B)non-payment related defaults,if material;(C)unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform;(F)adverse tax opinions,the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notice of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 —TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds, or other material events affecting the tax status of the Bonds; (G)modifications to rights of holders of the Bonds,if material; (H)bond calls(other than scheduled mandatory redemptions of Term Bonds),if material,and tender offers; (I)defeasances;(J)release, substitution,or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material;(K)rating changes; (L)bankruptcy,insolvency,receivership or similar event of the City, as such "Bankruptcy Events" are defined in Rule 15c2-12; (M) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the City other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; (N) appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material; (0) incurrence of a financial obligation of the City or obligated person,if material, or agreement to covenants,events of default,remedies,priority rights, or other similar terms of a financial obligation of the City or obligated person, any of which affect Ordinance No. 19- Page 17 of 22 security holders,if material;and(P)default,event of acceleration,termination event,modification of terms, or other similar events under the terms of the financial obligation of the City or obligated person, any of which reflect financial difficulties. The term"financial obligation"means a(i) debt obligation; (ii) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or (iii) guarantee of(i) or(ii). The term "financial obligation" shall not include municipal securities as to which a final official statement has been provided to the MSRB consistent with Rule 15c2-12. (3)Timely notice of a failure by the City to provide required annual financial information on or before the date specified in paragraph (b). (b) Type of Annual Financial Information Undertaken to be Provided. The annual financial information that the City undertakes to provide in paragraph (a): (1)Shall consist of(A)annual financial statements prepared(except as noted in the financial statements) in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles applicable to local governmental units of the State such as the City,as such principles maybe changed from time to time,which statements maybe unaudited,provided,that if and when audited financial statements are prepared and available they will be provided; (B)principal amount of general obligation bonds outstanding at the end of the applicable fiscal year; (C) assessed valuation for that fiscal year; and (D) regular property tax levy rate and regular property tax levy rate limit for the fiscal year; (2) Shall be provided not later than the last day of the ninth month after the end of each fiscal year of the City(currently, a fiscal year ending December 31), as such fiscal year may be changed as required or permitted by State law, commencing with the City's fiscal year ending December 31, 2018; and Ordinance No. 19- Page 18 of 22 (3)May be provided in a single or multiple documents,and may be incorporated by specific reference to documents available to the public on the Internet website of the MSRB or filed with the SEC. (c)Amendment of Undertaking. This Undertaking is subject to amendment after the primary offering of the Bonds without the consent of any holder of any Bond, or of any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer,participating underwriter, Rating Agency or the MSRB, under the circumstances and in the manner permitted by Rule 15c2-12. The City will give notice to the MSRB of the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a brief statement of the reasons for the amendment. If the amendment changes the type of annual financial information to be provided,the annual financial information containing the amended financial information will include a narrative explanation of the effect of that change on the type of information to be provided. (d) Beneficiaries. This Undertaking shall inure to the benefit of the City and the holder of each Bond, and shall not inure to the benefit of or create any rights in any other person. (e) Termination of Undertaking. The City's obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of the Bonds. In addition, the City's obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate if the provisions of Rule 15c2-12 that require the City to comply with this Undertaking become legally inapplicable in respect of the Bonds for any reason,as confirmed by an opinion of Bond Counsel delivered to the City, and the City provides timely notice of such termination to the MSRB. (f)Remedy,for Failure to Comply with Undertaking. As soon as practicable after the City learns of any failure to comply with this Undertaking, the City will proceed with due diligence to cause such noncompliance to be corrected. No failure by the City or other obligated person to comply with this Ordinance No. 19- Page 19 of 22 Undertaking shall constitute an event of default. The sole remedy of any holder of a Bond shall be to take action to compel the City or other obligated person to comply with this Undertaking,including seeking an order of specific performance from an appropriate court. (g)Designation of Official Responsible to Administer Undertaking. The Finance Director or his or her designee is the person designated, in accordance with the Bond Ordinance, to carry out the Undertaking in accordance with Rule 15c2-12,including,without limitation,the following actions: (1) Preparing and filing the annual financial information undertaken to be provided; (2) Determining whether any event specified in paragraph (a) has occurred, assessing its materiality, where necessary, with respect to the Bonds, and preparing and disseminating any required notice of its occurrence; (3) Determining whether any person other than the City is an"obligated person"within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 with respect to the Bonds,and obtaining from such person an undertaking to provide any annual financial information and notice of listed events for that person required under Rule 15c2-12; (4) Selecting, engaging and compensating designated agents and consultants, including financial advisors and legal counsel, to assist and advise the City in carrying out this Undertaking; and (5) Effecting any necessary amendment of this undertaking. Section 17. Supplemental and Amendatory Ordinances.The City may supplement or amend this ordinance for any one or more of the following purposes without the consent of any Owners of the Bonds: Ordinance No. 19- Page 20 of 22 (a)To add covenants and agreements that do not materially adversely affect the interests of Owners, or to surrender any right or power reserved to or conferred upon the City. (b)To cure any ambiguities, or to cure, correct or supplement any defective provision contained in this ordinance in a manner that does not materially adversely affect the interest of the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. Section 18. General Authorization acrd Ratificatioii. The Mayor, City Clerk, Designated Representative and other appropriate officers of the City are severally authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents as in their judgment may be necessary or desirable to carry out the transactions contemplated in connection with this ordinance, and to do everything necessary for the prompt delivery of each Series of the Bonds to the Purchaser thereof and for the proper application, use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds. All actions taken prior to the effective date of this ordinance in furtherance of the purposes described in this ordinance and not inconsistent with the terms of this ordinance are ratified and confirmed in all respects. Section 19. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. If a court of competent jurisdiction, all appeals having been exhausted or all appeal periods having run, finds any provision of this ordinance to be invalid or unenforceable as to any person or circumstance, such offending provision shall,if feasible,be deemed to be modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity. However, if the offending provision cannot be so modified,it shall be null and void with respect to the particular person or circumstance,and all other provisions of this ordinance in all other respects,and the offending provision with respect to all other persons and all other circumstances, shall remain valid and enforceable. Ordinance No. 19- Page 21 of 22 Sec.tioi} 20. I ffective Date of'Ordinance. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and five days following its publication as required by law. Section 21. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of , 20 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY: JIM FERRELL, MAYOR ATTEST: STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. RYAN CALL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 19- Page 22 of 22