The URL can be used to link to this page

LUTC PKT 01-06-2020 City of Federal Way City Council Land Use & Transportation Committee January 6, 2020 City Hall 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC COMMENT 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS Action Topic Title/Description Presenter Page or Council Date Info A. Approval of Minutes: November 4, 2019 3 Action N/A B. Resolution: Amendment to the Countywide Clark 7 Action January 21, 2020 Planning Policies C. S Dash Pt Rd Improvements—Authorization to Mullen 27 Action January 21, 2020 Award D. 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 Bid Award Smith 33 Action January 21, 2020 E. Industrial Park Parking Restrictions and Tow Kennedy 37 Action January 21, 2020 Away Zones Signing F. The Ridge Right of Way Dedication Walsh 41 Info N/A G. Monthly Report on Airport Issues Vadino 43 Info N/A H. Discussion on"Keep the Change"signs Vadino 45 Info N/A discouraging donations to panhandlers 4. OTHER 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS: The next LUTC meeting will be February 3, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. 6. ADJOURNMENT Committee Members City Staff Mark Koppang, Chair EJ Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Director Jesse E.Johnson,Member 1 Rebecca Kovar,Administrative Assistant II Hoang V. Tran,Member (253)835-2701 This page left blank intentionally. z City of Federal Way City Council Land Use & Transportation Committee December 2, 2019 City Hall 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers MEETING SUMMARY Committee Members in Attendance: Committee Chair Mark Koppang, Committee member Jesse Johnson, and Committee member Hoang Tran. Councilmembers in attendance: Deputy Mayor Susan Honda and Councilmember Lydia Assefa-Dawson. Staff in Attendance: Public Works Director EJ Walsh, Deputy Public Works Director Desiree Winkler, Deputy City Attorney Mark Orthmann,Water Quality Program Coordinator Leah Myhre,Senior Capital Engineer Christine Mullen, Capital Engineer John Cole, Capital Engineer Jeff Huynh, Senior Capital Engineer Kent Smith, Surface Water Manager Theresa Thurlow, Policy Advisor Bill Vadino, and Administrative Assistant II Rebecca Kovar. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Koppang called the meeting to order at 5:00. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT: 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS: Topic Title/Description A. Approval of Minutes: November 4, 2019 Committee approved the November 4, 2019 LUTC minutes as presented. • Moved: Johnson • Seconded: Tran • Passed: 3-0 unanimously B. North LMD: Resolution Creating an Advisory Committee Water Quality Program Coordinator Leah Myhre discussed the proposed Resolution to create an advisory committee for the North Lake Management District to develop and implement a work plan to handle lake maintenance and water quality, as well as public outreach and education. All property owners in the LMD will be eligible to serve. Deputy Mayor Honda asked for clarification on who pays legal fees if a property owner does not pay and a lien is put on the property. Ms. Myrhe explained that King County absorbs those costs and has the option of foreclosure if assessments are not paid for more than three years. Committee forwarded Option #1 (Approve the proposed resolution creating an Advisory Committee for the North Lake Management District Number 2 and establishing the duties thereof.)to the January 7, 2020 Council Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Tran • Seconded: Johnson • Passed: 3-0 unanimously Committee Members City Staff Mark Koppang, Chair EJ Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Director Hoang V. Tran,Member 3 Rebecca Kovar,Administrative Assistant 11 Jesse E.Johnson,Member (253)835-2701 C. North LMD: Ordinance Establishing the Time of Payment, Interest,and Penalties on Delinquent Assessments. Water Quality Program Coordinator Leah Myhre provided background on the proposed Ordinance, including the steps taken leading up to the Ordinance, which would define what happens when property owners fail to pay assessments. Committee forwarded Option #1 (Adopt the proposed Ordinance) to the January 7, 2020 Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Johnson • Seconded: Tran • Passed: 3-0 unanimously D. Military Rd S/S 298th St Compact Roundabout— Project Acceptance Senior Capital Engineer Christine Mullen discussed the background and final acceptance of the project, which came in under budget. Council Member Lydia Assefa-Dawson asked for clarification on the funding sources for the project in light of I-976. Public Works Director EJ Walsh explained that the project has been completed and therefore is not subject to cancelation. Discussion ensued on the funding of traffic circle construction going forward. Deputy Mayor Honda asked where the extra funding will go. Mr. Walsh explained that the funds are restricted for the use of capital projects within the right of way. Ms. Honda asked if the roundabout fulfilled its purpose. Mr. Walsh says that there is not enough data but traffic flow and safety have already improved. Committee forwarded Option #1 (Authorize final acceptance of the Military Rd S/S 298th St Compact Roundabout constructed by Active Construction, Inc., in the amount of $711,527.20 as complete) to the January 7, 2020 Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Tran • Seconded: Johnson • Passed: 3-0 unanimously E. Joint Construction Agreement with PSE for 2020 Asphalt Overlay Program Capital Engineer John Cole presented information on the proposed joint construction agreement for a section of Pete von Reichbauer Way due to a gas main replacement. The joint agreement should reduce cost and disruption. Chair Koppang requested clarification on the shared costs,and Mr. Cole explained that it would save money for the City. Council Member Johnson asked about the funding source. Mr. Cole explained that PSE will fund the project. Public Works Director EJ Walsh further clarified how the financing of the project works. Deputy Mayor Honda asked about the construction site currently on that road. Mr. Cole explained that the two projects won't be in conflict. Committee forwarded Option #1 (Authorize the Mayor to execute the Joint Construction Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Puget Sound Energy for the overlay of a portion of Pete von Reichbauer Way) to the January 7, 2020 Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Johnson • Seconded: Tran • Passed: 3-0 unanimously F. 2018 NHS Preservation Project— Final Acceptance Capital Engineer Jeff Huynh gave an overview of the project, which came in under budget. Committee Members City Staff Mark Koppang, Chair EJ Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Director Hoang V. Tran,Member 4 Rebecca Kovar,Administrative Assistant 11 Jesse E.Johnson,Member (253)835-2701 Committee forwarded Option #1 (Authorize final acceptance of the 2018 NHS Preservation Project constructed by Miles Resources, LLC in the amount of$2,523,274.31 as complete)to the January 7, 2020 Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Tran • Seconded: Johnson • Passed: 3-0 unanimously G. 2019 Asphalt Overlay Project— Final Acceptance Capital Engineer Jeff Huynh gave an overview of the project. Council Member Tran praised staff for the work done on this and other projects that came in under budget. Chair Koppang also praised the project management team for their good work. Committee forwarded Option #1 (Authorize final acceptance of the 2019 Asphalt Overlay Project constructed by Miles Resources, LLC in the amount of$1,420,0820.78 as complete) to the January 7, 2020 Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Johnson • Seconded: Tran • Passed: 3-0 unanimously H. 2019 Storm Pipe Repair— Phase 1 Acceptance Senior Capital Engineer Kent Smith presented background on the storm pipe repair projects, which came in under budget. No additional funds will be required for this project. Council Member Tran praised the project staff for bringing the contract in under budget. Committee forwarded Option #1 (Authorize final acceptance of the 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 1 constructed by Nordvind Sewer Service, LLC in the amount of $87,251092 as complete) to the January 7, 2020 Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Tran • Seconded: Johnson • Passed: 3-0 unanimously I. 2020/2021 Surface Water Management Vactor Services and Drainage Infrastructure Maintenance—Authorization to Bid Surface Water Manager Theresa Thurlow explained the requirements for keeping clean catch basins, ponds, and other infrastructure. Ms. Thurlow does not recommend extending the current contract but rather recommended bidding a new contract. Committee forwarded Option #1 (Authorize staff to bid the proposed 2020/2021 Surface Water Maintenance and Services Contract and return to the LUTC and Council for authorization to award the contract within the available project budget to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.) to the January 7, 2020 Consent Agenda for approval. • Moved: Johnson • Seconded: Tran • Passed: 3-0 unanimously J. Panhandling Signage Discussion Policy Advisor Bill Vadino presented his research into other cities' usage of signs to discourage Committee Members City Staff Mark Koppang, Chair EJ Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Director Hoang V. Tran,Member 5 Rebecca Kovar,Administrative Assistant 11 Jesse E.Johnson,Member (253)835-2701 panhandling. He provided the scope and cost of putting up the signs in Federal Way as well as likely maintenance and replacement concerns. Council Member Johnson asked why the locations for proposed signs were chosen. Council Member Johnson also asked if the City has a list of charitable organizations that might be suggested. Mr.Vadino discussed possible options. Attorney Mark Orthman cautioned that further research is necessary before deciding on organizations that would be funded/distribute aid. Council Member Tran expressed an objection to tax dollars being used to pay for the signs. Deputy Mayor Honda stated that she has a lot of concerns about the signs, including the cost and the impact on the community. Chair Koppang suggested that more research and information and detailed projections is in order. K. Report on Progress with Aircraft Issues Policy Advisor Bill Vadino reported on current issues with the proposed expansion of SeaTac Airport, specifically noise concerns that negatively impact Federal Way and other surrounding communities. 4. OTHER 5. FUTURE MEETINGS/AGENDA ITEMS: The next LUTC meeting will be held on January 6, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers. 6. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:12 p.m. Attest: Approved by Committee: Rebecca Kovar, Administrative Assistant II Date Committee Members City Staff Mark Koppang, Chair EJ Walsh,P.E.,Public Works Director Hoang V. Tran,Member 6 Rebecca Kovar,Administrative Assistant 11 Jesse E.Johnson,Member (253)835-2701 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 21, 2020 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT:Ratification of Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies Regarding School Siting POLICY QUESTION: Should the City Council ratify the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) adopted by the King County Council and attached as Exhibit C?This CPP sets out best practices for cities and the county working together with school districts to build new schools and school facilities within the Urban Growth Area(UGA). COMMITTEE:Land Use/Transportation Committee(LUTC) MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020 CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ® City Council Business Resolution El Other STAFF REPORT BY: Margaret Clark DEPT: Community Development Attachments: A) Staff Report to LUTC; B) Cover Letter from King County; C) King County Ordinance adopting new CPPs (including attachments). Options Considered: 1. Recommend that the Mayor send a letter in support of the amendments to the CPPs to King County, which would have the effect of ratification. 2. Recommend that the City Council do nothing,which also is considered to be ratification. 3. Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution opposing the amendments to the CPPs. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends Option 1 —Send a letter in support of the amendments to the CPPs to King Cownny, MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL' t.�t rree914 t.glt6tlV4 Initial/Date Init 61 Dale Itnlitti l '�1c' COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the January 21, 2020, business agenda for approval. _................... Mari 1Comtt1g,(',onnnittee Chair.. _.. ns Jesse Johnson, ww ww on,Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval of Option 1." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading _- ____ ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# .................................... REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# K:\Countywide Planning Policies\2019 CWPPs\School Siting Policy\LUTC\121719 Agenda Bill.doc 7 EXHIBITA s CITY DF Federal 7 EXI l (env radora'oprfardpd y CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: December 17, 2019 TO: Land Use/Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor B mutt .Davis, Community Developnient Director FROM: Robi.rl``Doc"Hansen,Planning Mariager2� Margaret Clark, Principal Planner NwK, SUBJECT: Ratification of Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies regarding School Siting MEETING DATE January 6, 2020 I. FINANCIAL IMPACTS There are no financial impacts to the City as this request from King County is to consider and ratify an amendment to the Countywide Policies related to best practices jurisdictions can take to facilitate the development and renovation of public schools within the Urban Growth Area(UGA). II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On October 28, 2019,the City received a request from King County to review and ratify amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). On October 15, 2019,the Metropolitan King County Council adopted Ordinance 18991, which approved and ratified the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)Motion No. 18-1 on behalf of unincorporated King County. The CPPB are a broad set of mutually agreed upon policies that are required by the Growth Management Act(GMA). The City's comprehensive plan must be consistent with the CPPs. The original CPPs were adopted in the earlyl990s. Periodic amendments or new policies are proposed as necessary to address regional issues. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. A city is deemed to have ratified the amendments if it either sends a letter in support of the amendments or does nothing. If a city opposes the amendments, it must take legislative action within 90 days of adoption by King County. The 90-day deadline for responding on this proposed amendment is January 23, 2020. 9 Land Use and Transportation Committee January 6,2020 Page 2 t1l. Summary of Amendments to the CPPB Ordinance 18991 adopts and ratifies Motion No. 18-01, which sets out the following best practices for cities and the county working together with school districts to build new schools and school facilities within the UGA: 1. Identify surplus public properties that could work as new school sites. City Response: If approached by the School District, the City through its Geographical Information System(GIS) division can assist with this identification/ 2. Assist with identifying private properties that could be available for new school sites. City Response: Same as Response#1. 3. Look for opportunities for shared use of buildings, fields,parking, and other facilities between the city or county and the school district. City Response: The City has an interlocal agreement with the School District for joint use of the parks at Saghalle, Sacajawea, and Lakota Middle Schools. 4. Consider options and zoning for mixed-use development that could accommodate a school. City Response: Schools are allowed in the Neighborhood Business (BN), Community Business(BC), City-Center Frame(CC-F), and City-Center Core(CC-C) zones, which all allow schools and mixed-use development. There is an Early Learning Center at Uptown Square, a recently constructed mixed-use development complex, 5. Investigate how regulations and processes can be modified to make challenging sites work for new, expanded, and renovated school facilities (such as providing flexible application of development regulations for height restrictions, maximum lot coverage, and parking standards) and consider the feasibility of allowing playfields in the Rural Area adjacent to schools located in the UGA and with direct access from the UGA. City Response: The City's zoning regulations do not presently include such flexible regulations; however, the City allows requests for code amendments to the City council for their consideration.The City does not have any authority for location of school facilities in the UGA or Rural Area, as they are presently under King County's jurisdiction. 6. Broaden the number of zone classifications within which schools are permitted to locate. City Response: Schools are an allowable use in all zones except the Commercial Enterprise(CE) zone, which is the City's equivalent of an industrial zone. However, business schools,vocational schools, and trade schools are allowed in the CE zone. 10 Land Use and Transportation Committee January 6,2020 Page 3 7. Coordinate the permit review process to improve certainty for school districts and to shorten the permitting process time(using priority permitting as appropriate). City Response.- The City has a very efficient permitting process, and the Building Division does offer the option for a third-party review at the applicant's expense,which would expedite the review and approval process. The City completed review of land use permits for four schools during the last year with all schools being approved 8. Implement a phased review of school development so the school site may be modified as needed over time, and so portable facilities may be sited and/or replaced in an efficient manner. City Response.- The City's administration of the zoning code has provisions for phased review for addition of portables to a developed school site or when proposing development of a new school. 9. Work with school districts to establish site-specific Transportation Demand Management{TDM)protocols to encourage more walking, biking, and transit ridership to reduce the need for parking. City Response.- The City does not presently have site-specific TDM protocols to encourage more walking, biking, and transit ridership to reduce the need for parking although the City worked closely with the School District in the development of four new schools on facilities enhancing walking, biking, and bussing. The City has the following goals and policies in Chapter 3, "Transportation" of the comprehensive plan, to encourage more walking, biking, and transit ridership: TG3 Enhance community health, livability, and transportation by providing a connected system of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit ways that are integrated into a coordinated regional network. TP3.8 Encourage non-motorized improvements that minimize the need for residents to use motorized modes by extending the existing non-motorized system and providing: 1. Access to activity centers and schools; 2. Linkage to transit, park&ride lots, and school bus networks; 3. Completion of planned pedestrian/jogging or bicycle trails; 4. Designating a network of streets that can safely and efficiently accommodate bicycles; and S. Extend sidewalks to all streets. TP3.9 Facilitate a safe school walking routes program, and,where possible, make capital budget decisions that support such a system. TP3.10 Provide a one-mile grid of bicycle facilities connecting major activity centers, recreational facilities, and schools. Land Use and Transportation Committee January 6,2020 Page 4 TG5 Develop and implement transportation systems management strategies and programs that contribute to the overall effectiveness of the multimodal transportation system. 10. Partner with school districts in the planning and financing needed to improve, if appropriate,based on topography and surrounding neighborhood characteristics, walking, and biking routes to school. City Response: The City does not have an existing policy of partnering with the School District in the planning and financing for the improvement of walking and biking activities. Any financing decisions are made by the City Council in a particular situation. However,the City does have zoning regulations related to providing"Complete Streets" in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.135.205. This policy states that the City will plan for, design, and construct all new and retrofitted transportation projects to provide reasonable and appropriate accommodation for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users of all ages and abilities, creating a comprehensive, integrated, connected network for all modes of travel, including walking and biking VI. LUTC OPTIONS The LUTC has three options: 1. Recommend that the Mayor send a letter in support of the amendments to the CPPs to King County, which would have the effect of ratification. 2. Recommend that the City Council do nothing, which also is considered to be ratification. 3. Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution opposing the amendments to the CPPB. VII. MAYOR RECOMMENDATION The Mayor recommends Option 1 — Send a letter in support of the amendments to the CPPs to King County. K:ACOUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES\201 9 CWPPS\SCFIOOL SITING POLICY\LUTC\121719 LUTC MEMORANDUM.DOCX 12 EXHIBIT . 13 EXY " King County FREC ED O I. 1 October 25, 2019 The Honorable Jim Ferrell City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave. South Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mayor Ferrell: We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendment to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On October 9, 2019, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified the amendment on behalf of unincorporated King County. The ordinance will become effective Friday, October 25, 2019. Copies of the transmittal letter, King County Council staff report, ordinance 18991 and Growth Management Planning Council motion are enclosed to assist you in your review of this amendment. In accordance with the CPP, G-1, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the CPP and amendments unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for these amendments is Thursday, January 23, 2020. If you adopt any legislation concerning this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, Thursday, January 23, 2020, to Melani Pedroza, Clerk of the Council, Room 1200, King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Karen Wolf, Senior Strategy and Performance Analyst, King County 14 Executive's Office, at 206 263-9649, or Andy Micklow, Metropolitan King County Council Staff, at 206 263-3226. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Rod Dembowski, Chair Dow Constantine Metropolitan King County Council King County Executive Enclosures cc-King County City Planning Directors Sound Cities Association Lauren Smith, Director, Regional Planning Karen Wolf, Senior Strategy and Performance Analyst Andy Micklow, Council Staff, Mobility and Environment Committee 15 w ... r- 0 i V D King County t Li Dow Constantine 2-M JUL i" 05 King County Executive 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98104-1818 206-263-9600 Fax 206-296-0194 TTY Relay: 711 www.kingcounty.gov July 3, 2019 The Honorable Rod Dembowski Chair, King County Council Room 1200 COURTHOUSE Dear Councilmember Dembowski This letter transmits an ordinance that will enable King County to implement the King County Countywide Planning Policies by facilitating the siting of public schools inside the Urban Growth Area. The school districts that have both urban and rural territory are focusing their efforts on building with the Urban Growth Area consistent with King County Countywide Planning Policies. But, building in the cities comes with challenges such as limited land available schools and the regulatory structure. Motion 18-1, approved by the Growth Management Council, outlines actions that jurisdictions can take to facilitate the development and renovation of public schools within the Urban Growth Area. This ordinance integrates the goals of the King County Strategic Plan by recognizing the role of land use planning in shaping environmentally sustainable and economically viable future for all people in King County. The County's role in the GMPC fosters the ethic of working together for "One King County" by actively participating in regional organizations and defining King County's role in regional issues. Thank you for your consideration of this ordinance. This important legislation will help foster vibrant urban communities allowing schools to serve as a focal point. King County is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer °`'i and complies with the AmJhcans with Disabilitites Act 7II 17 1200 King County Courthouse KING COUNTY 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 King County Signature Report Ordinance 18991 EA Proposed No. 2019-0312.2 Sponsors Upthegrove 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting and ratifying Growth 2 Management Planning Council Motion 18-1. 3 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 4 SlicrlON i.. Findings: 5 A. Growth Management Planning Council Motion 18-1 outlines best practices 6 jurisdictions can take to facilitate the development and rendvation of public schools 7 within the Urban Growth Area. 8 B. On May 30, 2018, the Growth Management Planning Council unanimously 9 adopted Motion 18-1. 1 18 Ordinance 18991 10 SECTION 2., The bestpractices outlined in Motion 18-1, are hereby adopted by 11 King County and ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, 12 Ordinance 18991 was introduced on 9/25/2019 and hearing held/closed and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 10/9/2019, by the following vote: Yes: 8 - Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Gossett, Mr. Dunn, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Dembowski, Mr. Upthegrove, Ms. Kohl-Welles and Ms. Balducci No: 1 - Ms. Lambert " ' 314 4N 1 KING COUNTY COUNCIL til ti,". n "I KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON � �. Z .r) Zi tit , `.............. — .... .... _ i row " Rod Dembowski, Chair ATTEST: 1'r? Melani Pedroza,Clerk of the Counci Q C-73 4l r—n M,f - APPROVED this / , day of " ' ,2019. ,� —v rxrwry6Nw;,,,. Dow Constantine, County Executive Attachments: A. GMPC Motion 18-1 2 19 Ordinance 18991 5/30/18 Attachment A Sponsored By; Executive Committee 1. 2 GMPC MOTION NO. 18-1 3 A MOTION outlining actions jurisd ictions can take to facilitate the 4 development and renovation of public schools within the Urban 5 Growth Area. 6 7 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) convened the 8 School Siting Task Force in 2011 to address the issue of whether public schools serving 9 primarily urban populations should be sited in rural areas; and 10 WHEREAS,the Task Force completed their work on March 31,2012, issuing a 11 report and final recommendations to the King County Executive; and 12 WHEREAS,as a result of the work of the Task Force, three new policies were 13 added to the 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPB) —PF-18, PF-19, and 14 PF-19A;and 15 WHEREAS,student enrollments at school districts in King County are rapidly 16 increasing causing a push to build more schools and school facilities and expand existing 17 ones; and 18 WHEREAS,the school districts that have both urban and rural territory are 19 focusing their efforts on building within the Urban Growth Area(UGA)consistent with the 20 CPPs; and 21 WHEREAS, land sufficient for schools is scarce within the UGA and the 22 regulatory structure can pose barriers to building quality schools; and 20 23 WHEREAS,the challenges with school siting affect both school districts with 24 urban and rural territory and school districts with entirely urban territory; and 25 WHEREAS,school districts, cities, and King County collectively hold an interest 26 in providing residents with needed school capacity within the UGA in a timely manner that 27 makes best use of limited taxpayer resources; and 28 WHEREAS,school districts operate with limited financial resources and both the 29 districts and general-purpose governments recognize an obligation to be responsible 30 stewards of public funds; 31 THEREFORE,the King County GMPC endorses the following best practices for 32 cities and the county working together with school districts to build new schools and 33 school facilities within the UGA: 34 1. Identify surplus public properties that could work as new school sites. 35 2. Assist with identifying private properties that could be available for new 36 school sites. 37 3. Look for opportunities for shared use of buildings, fields,parking and other 38 facilities between the city or county and the school district. 39 4. Consider options and zoning for mixed-use development that could 40 accommodate a school. 41 5. Investigate how regulations and processes can be modified to make 42 challenging sites work for new,expanded,and renovated school facilities 43; (such as providing flexible application of development regulations for height 44 restrictions, maximum lot coverage, and parking standards)and considerthe 21 45 feasibility of allowing playfields in the Rural Area adjacent to schools located 46 in the UGA and with d irect access from the UGA. 47 6. Broaden the number of zone classifications within which schools are permitted 48 to locate. 49 7. Coordinate the permit review process to improve certainty for school districts 50 and to shorten the permitting process time (using priority permitting as 51 appropriate). 52 8. Implement a phased review of school development so the school site may be 53 modified as needed overtime and so portable facilities may be sited and/or 54 replaced in an efficient manner. 55 9. Work with school districts,to establish site-specific Transportation Demand 56 Management (TDM) protocols to encourage more walking, biking, and transit 57 ridership to reduce the need for parking. 58 10. Partner with school districts in the planning and financing needed to improve, 59 if appropriate based on topography and surrounding neighborhood 60 characteristics, walking and biking routes to the school. 61 62 63 Dow Constantine, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council 22 King County Metropolitan King County Council Mobility and Environment Committee REVISED STAFF REPORT Agenda Itemmmmmmmmmm Name:. Andy Micklow Proposed No.: 2019-0312 Date: September 26, 2019 COMMITTEE ACTION Proposed Substitute Ordinance 2019-0312.2 which would adopt and ratify Growth Management Planning Council Motion 18-1, passed out of committee on October 1, 2019, with a "Do Pass" recommendation. The Ordinance was amended in committee with Amendment 1 to correct the date of the GMPC meeting from May 28, 2018 to May 30, 2018. SUBJECT Adoption of recommendations from the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) that outline best practices jurisdictions can take to facilitate the development and renovation of public schools within the Urban Growth Area. SUMMARY Proposed Ordinance 2019-0312 would adopt Growth Management Planning Council Motion 18-1 which outlines best practices jurisdictions can take to facilitate the development and renovation of public schools within the Urban Growth Area. If adopted by the Council, the ordinance would also ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County and begin the ratification process by the cities in King County. BACKGROUND The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties and cities to work together to plan for growth. In King County, the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is the countywide planning body through which the County and cities collaborate. The GMPC is comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Sound Cities Association, and special purpose districts. The GMPC convened the School Siting Task Force in 2011 to address the issue of whether public schools serving primarily urban populations should be sited in rural 23 areas, and whether such facilities should be served by sewers. The School Siting Task Force produced a final report and recommendations in March 2012. Recommendations from the School Siting Task Force Final Report were incorporated into three new Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) in 2012. The three policies regarding school siting added in the 2012 Countywide Planning Policies' are: PF-1.8 Locate schools, institutions, and other community facilities and services that primarily serve urban populations within the Urban Growth Area, where they are accessible to the communities they serve, except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report). Locate these facilities in places that are well served by transit and pedestrian and bicycle networks. PF-19 Locate new schools and institutions primarily serving rural residents in neighboring cities and rural towns, except as provided in Appendix 5 (March 31, 2012 School Siting Task Force Report) and locate new community facilities and services that primarily serve rural residents in neighboring cities and rural towns, with the limited exceptions when their use is dependent upon a rural location and their size and scale supports rural character. Public school facilities to meet the needs of growing communities are an essential part of the public infrastructure. Coordination between each jurisdiction's land use plan and regulations and their respective school district[s] facility needs are essential for public school capacity needs to be met. The following policy applies countywide and requires engagement between each school district and each city that is served by the school district. The policy also applies to King County as a jurisdiction for areas of unincorporated King County that are within a school district's service boundary. The policy initiates a periodic procedure to identify if there are individual school district siting issues and if so, a process for the school district and jurisdiction to cooperatively prepare strategies for resolving the issue. PF49A Plan, through a cooperative process between jurisdictions and school districts, that public school facilities are available, to meet the needs of existing and projected residential development consistent with adopted comprehensive plan policies and growth forecasts. Cooperatively work with each school district located within the jurisdiction's boundaries to evaluate the school district's ability to site school facilities necessary to meet the school district's identified student capacity needs. Use school district capacity and enrollment data and the growth forecasts and development data of each jurisdiction located within the school district's service boundaries. By January 2016 and every two years thereafter, determine if there is development capacity and the supporting infrastructure to site the needed school facilities. If not, cooperatively prepare a strategy to address the,capacity shortfall. Potential strategies may. include: • Shared public facilities such as play fields, parking areas and access drives • School acquisition or lease of appropriate public lands i 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies, as amended further in 2016: http://www.kingcotinty.gov/depts/executive/performance-strategy-budget/regional-pi.annin.g/CPPs.aspx 24 • Regulatory changes such as allowing schools to locate in additional zones or revised development standards • School design standards that reduce land requirements (such as multi-story structures or reduced footprint) while still meeting programmatic needs. In 2017, and every two years thereafter, King County shall report to the GMPC on whether the goals of this policy are being met. The GMPC shall identify corrective actions as necessary to implement this policy. The 2018 School Siting Report to the GMPC found, "the requirement to accommodate student capacity primarily in the urban area is challenging, and has become even more so as King County continues to grow and as Washington state implements new policies impacting school capacity.112 ANALYSIS On May 30, 2018, the GMPC unanimously adopted Motion 18-1, which is a non-binding recommendation to the Council to endorse actions the County and its cities can take to further facilitate the development and renovation of public schools within the UGA. Motion 18-1 recommends ten best practices for the cities and the county to work together with school districts to build new schools and school facilities within the UGA. The recommendations in Motion 18-1 include the following: 1. Identify surplus public properties that could work as new school sites. 2. Assist with identifying private properties that could be available for new school sites. 3. Look for opportunities for shared use of buildings, fields, parking and other facilities between the city or county and the school district. 4. Consider options and zoning for mixed-use development that could accommodate a school. 5. Investigate how regulations and processes can be modified to make challenging sites work for new, expanded, and renovated school facilities (such as providing flexible application of development regulations for height restrictions, maximum lot coverage, and parking standards) and consider the feasibility of allowing playfields in the Rural Area adjacent to schools located in the UGA and with direct access from the UGA. 6. Broaden the number of zone classifications within which schools are permitted to locate. 7. Coordinate the permit review process-to improve certainty for school districts and to shorten the permitting process time (using priority permitting as appropriate). 8. Implement a phased review of school development so the school site may be modified as needed over time and so portable facilities may be sited and/or replaced in an efficient manner. https://www.kingcounty.gov/--/rnedia/depts/executive/perfoi-mance-strategy-budget/regional- planning/GrowthManagement/GMPCMeetin-05301 8/GMPC-Report-PF-19A-2018-053018 25 9. Work with school districts, to establish site-specific Transportation Demand Management (TDM) protocols to encourage more walking, biking, and transit ridership to reduce the need for parking. 10.Partner with school districts in the planning and financing needed to improve, if appropriate based on topography and surrounding neighborhood characteristics, walking and biking routes to-the school-. Adoption of Proposed Ordinance 2019-0312 would approve the recommendation from the GMPC. Council approval of the Proposed Ordinance would also ratify the motion on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County and begin the ratification process by the cities. The ratification_ process is outlined in CPP G-13 and includes: recommendation by the GMPC, adoption and ratification by the-King County Council, and ratification by the cities. Ratification must occur within 90 days of King County approval. Ratification requires affirmation by the county and cities and town representing at least 70 percent of the county population and 30 percent of those jurisdictions. Ratification is either by affirmative vote of the city's or town's council or by no action being taken within the ratification period. The GMPC staff analysis of Motion 18-1 as presented to the GMPC is included as Attachment 4 to this staff report. AMENDMENT Amendment 1 is included in the packet, and would correct the date of the May 30, 2018 GMPC meeting. s 2012 Ding County Countywide Planning Policies,as amended further in 2016: http://www,kingcounty.gov/depts/executive/performance-strategy-budge t/regional-planning/CPPs.aspx 26 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 21, 2020 ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: S DASH POINT RD IMPROVEMENTS—BID AWARD POLICY QUESTION: Should City Council award the S Dash Point Rd Improvements to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder? COMMITTEE: LUTC MEETING DATE: Jan 6, 2020 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Christine MI — lehaI'll, 7 ,�l�„ Senior Capital Iatigineer DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report&Bid Tabulation Options Considered: 1. Award the S Dash Point Rd Improvements to Active Construction, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of$1,159,159.00 (Schedule A+ Schedule B) and approve a ten percent contingency (Schedule A only) of $92,402.03, for a total amount of $1,251,561.03 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2. Reject all bids for the S Dash Point Rd Improvements and direct staff to rebid the project and return to Committee for further action. MAYOR'S RECOMMI+N9 °TION: The Mayor recommends approval of Option 1. MAYOR APPROVAL: JAIAtDIRECTOR APPROVAL: Initial�� .._. aYe So�saabs1ft'�a�se Ils�ogi�atl�l�nPw COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option 1 to the January 21, 2020 City Council consent agenda for approval. ....... ... Mark leo ala=,+ ommittee Chair Jesse Jolmson,Committee Member (loo! x 1 ran,Committee Mcinber PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize staff to award the S Dash Point Rd Improvements to Active Construction, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of$1,159,159.00 (Schedule A + B) and approve a 10% contingency (Schedule A only) of$92,402.03,for a total amount of$1,251,561.03, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. " (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)mmmmmmm COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# 27 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM ................ DATE: 06-Jan-2020 TO: City Council VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: E.J. Walsh, P.F'.,Public Works Director Christine Mullen, P, Senior Capital Engiiieerog SUBJECT: S Dash Point Rd Improvements—Bid Award FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This project was included and is projected to be completed within the approved budget under capital project#212. Upon completion of this project, ongoing costs associated with operations and maintenance will be performed and funded through streets maintenance. Funding requirements for operations and maintenance of infrastructure is reviewed and adjusted as required during the budget process. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Twelve bids were received and opened on December 13, 2019 for the S Dash Point Rd Improvements. Please see attached Bid Tabulation Summary. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Active Construction,Inc. (ACI)with a total bid of$1,159,159.00. ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Design $ 100,000.00 Right-of-Way $ 0.00 2020 Construction Cost(Schedule A+B) $ 1,159,159.00 10%Construction Contingency(Schedule A only) $ 92,402.03 Construction Management $ 246,866.73 --........... .... --- Total Project Costs $ 1,598,427.76 AVAILABLE FUNDING: City Funds—Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax $ 320,000.00 City Funds—Transfer from Project#194 Savings $ 206,228.00 City Funds—Transfer from Project#204 Savings $ 300,000.00 City Funds—Transfer from Project#211 Savings $ 100,000.00 Grant—Transportation Improvement Board $ 347,812.00 Lakehaven * $ 324,387.76 Total Project Costs $ 1,598,427.76 Lakehaven's funding is for Schedule B costs (waterline relocation) as well as shared bid item costs for Schedule A(mobilization,material testing, etc.), Construction Management, and Project Administration costs. The Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Water& Sewer District was approved by City Council in October 2019. 28 O OE a 10 oOeO9 0 MU U) z 0 .1 w 0 ww vo 01 16 ?8 a$Ca 8 8 pfl aON sa 'o & C5 S, n. ISOOOOr-8 8 z!8 Is 8, 8 4pwAaFAN6R, td 16 pqcmmCGbJa F N Z < C) 0 w p. O rr 6 C6 J LLOOW". vo P o C� -1 §8 A 2 w I-t.PA Z vw 0~0"" z s�R, 8�a,8 8 g q 0 r �6 a I's 191,i'; IT, 12-1 1.- I U 16 6 kl� 6 k SSS O p. 00 A mK K 0 C, In N N 7<0 C� o a 0 R z 3:- 00 r. w 0 rCD S R D 12 CLO F- z wo 49 1. 1. 1. 's 3 8 a 0?bi 8 8 8 8 g 8 is .CW 9Qh 0 CD cn --',6 'n "u V� Zlh Z A a M 0. crM GA U)cc w ', 0 0 z S 16 IL I �4 w aG W VA C.3 X LU LL 2 lw CML S2 0 0 z Id V) U15 ILJ Z '. ct 0QQ 0 Q z u I < < z LD E u z LR �w L)u rlp C1 M ' -0 ZE Z Z LD 71. lz-' 9 1-4 z Z z :z rn p �-Lu Z;� D U > < Cil 10 U, _-z I wa 119 0 w V, <v'w iL u It I 1 VJ 0 NO ,, 1 1 w 0 D z T u 1 9 w < < Id w w 3 b�av A L I him 29 m 6 0 0 0 0 o e � _ a voi o z O n •^N N V V N N Qtp nl # z 3 o A n w v rn E "' m a0 $ o is n W 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 VF a$ o o� o o. F d � �s:$ o IMrY n un m oo C 7 m N -+• r O r O O n *^ Q Q CP N !9InEA OA A fA to FA V3 69 eA U3 ...,69 !9 o O N v01 t.. w O o o N o 0 0 o a o o 0 0 0 0 r.• 'v N n r-.. a a o rc• a Q o Fw cs x"'h .•" m +=a, of o vi r INm _ v U o m o o o 0 N N O d` 7 MY XNYto M :Hi to fA 69 w 'eA zcy o n o o �o o o m o cr'iMo o �e O 4Ci L( IAA N cp n V d4 D n N N vnN � n » n » o ,•ti.w� m z > p 0 d ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 Z N O A C 7 6 o u0i 43 O 0 6 a' i w O Obi V 0.p m b N N m_ V m II N O n N x Q Q f w� w-" to a .••"da Mu v vi < .rvf ri a v; *N N ou XXKXXKKK m Qy E 1`1 I o oo Z 0 N 4 O xl" d C n '�l YA dh fA YAF w I W w N t9 jw.: E9 ''..w w w„. V N N O Kr p �""• �"0a i o o �. 0 0 0 0” o a o, o o �+ ' o o o S 8 o S S ` 1. S <g N ®µ°M. N SIJ Tg Ati N aN N 3 V Z 00 xO mr O U a 3 c 7 � M'Y' yy w fwd� w{Y�'tl�^✓r pp My » [o o O D,G O O iC1'o o o, O 00 00" S 00 S o i49'C C C O ui • _ o "«' " o e m iroi ua,'g,a m o m N e U QF VT (V :• m eR n 3 r � � N U 'Jd 1A1 �wM fA w f9 w Hi w fA w d3 bf II��pp FA f9 w.LnY•✓b `,MW'. W O O O %'O O O, O (*{I O O N N O O O O O iCa O O O O 3 d X D D m O O K'a O I:S C} tD n N ui N n f O X95 m G C y" N 14f1 N 7 I ' O I.. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o ua pp N N o 0 U o o O o o O N O O O o O C1 0 0 0 n o Z Iroi f t~o o h G p m o v o o o •n O F Q Y- N 0 3 as x � w I z d S o r.r a r qrx o w F c O 7 Q M' WA M/M w Y ✓r I IN ¢ d' J �z LL J ¢ Q ¢ ) ) y y W W <. ` O Q U {y 7 W U U mm J M1 � > Q• � d O V Q Z W m o ui y J L u W ® m a j m m L) N W o o z z ¢ o r ui o J'.. z r a z z U Q > z W Z Z O 'a L z J li z H w a aJw a a z o a a IL ¢ o Qo u D 0 z,.- 3 w 3 '� 0 m 3 3 z .mcwi a u u_ w > z o 31, w L) C �� Iz� D z o z a s a `o �v E s �mOx a ¢u w '.Z us &7 ?�"w =F N� <� d"a'a q�iw � LL �O p m (7 5 y? l7 O YL z L z,O 0 d z 7 d y mo C Ck'.>O D w o o z'J cn¢ Cz+ pzN a m�u zFs Jc � z �F src r� a roo a ,z3 u4�F4� �o =Qw Jtai -'i a a D +'C ¢ C: iQ i O H H ¢ h^ W ZH H U 5 �X zS7 d w ¢- W Cy. w U U ¢¢uux�'s:4 `U D z,,. g O� z :. >am> >¢ W w w >p Lc; .''4 J W; z0 0¢ 4sJO J O� f- z z Oz z wr fi= > ¢O� O UmQr.•• J z v .. O D< �. o z z W� na ow,a w< �a to 5 L.G cLa�ca D O, O, O q l .,7? .LQi.. m o nv iv N ry o mm�A,�a om 30 CD cl� ": A VOW.. Sp it 0 In ........................................ ok, M �14M OR Rm 0;A a Vol 0 l�. .00 0 wl� 00 11 -tC- 1 1 9 8 S I—IMSSM, 1. 8 1. B 8 8 1. 8 9 8 9 1 8 8 1 8888'. .188 9 . 1 9 2 a 6 q g g 6.5 6 �4 5 6 o d 0�i �VR .866, P :",i o R gg g-FO § 9 1...9 1- 1 C0 q z V rr wi W�m g x2�w Ili m I F,F 0 2 D D �Q Iq 6 7 98 e R 0 I i 0 �F- . 0 �R I `� O¢ 0 � FMA9 �qq m n o 5!i o 15 1 a c5 o z lb N 4 u W w O z 2 o 0D 000. 0 L9 z a < L) L) z 71 cGa z�m u z�p,��, �z. , OM5. FD u F�Fn Z6k:e t jj z ol zw cL z Ir"r, �x"a, Wx FITT 31 .c cs O gig'. P+ uT4 6, war Z w 2 0 W � N 'O O O O O O O O O O w b b b -6 C) Lr, Z 0 O 2 1. o B . 9 §5 , , .- , .- §1 8. 14 < z xxxx xx W Iq I I z o 1 4 16 16 11 Ill "i 0(9 z volx x x x x z K x C) a s 14 uj 0 oU .P xxxxxxxx 2 s z C� o 7, 4 <F- X X K X X X z Ix I Z cl w �ww x j< u w w u L) w W < U v)v) mo z < < 0 w JY IA m a)WU z w Ji x rj rc < < z o < z < o x < z o z 11 0 z < z 3: < < Lu L) ID z Q > z D "o -)T z -, N o o .9 z z z o§ E w z u 0) z g CJ L, < VJ w z z L) r o w x a: '2 z V) c '41 & z DUJ z z P 2awLLa < c 0 L) < < 0 < z c) < (c:,z(<) >>awz z c) z O o Lu z< a: z o z V)z w > < z o z z z z I ow z < W o o L u I I N I �2 1-k k I 32 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 21, 2020 ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2019 STORM PIPE REPAIR PHASE 2–BID AWARD POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council award the 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder? .1.................... ------ COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: January 6, 2020 ............ —------ CATEGORY: 0 Consent E] Ordinance Public Hearing F] City Council Business El Resolution Other .......... STAFF REPORT BY: Kent Smith, P.E., Senior Capital Engineer DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Land Use and Transportation Committee memorandum dated January 6, 2020. Bid Tabulation Options Considered: 1. Award the 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 project to Insituform Technologies, LLC, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of$139,156.00 and approve a 10% contingency of$13,915.00 for a total of $153,071.00, approve a budget transfer from Unallocated SWM CIP Funds in the amount of$70,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 2. Reject all bids for the 2019 Ston-n Pipe Repair Phase 2 project and direct staff to rebid the project and return to Committee for .further action ............................................................................ ........................................... MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends forwarding Option I to the January 21, 2020 City Council Consent Agenda for appr?y* - F MAYOR APPROVAL: / fi DIRECTOR APPROVAL: (!c nwille '060unc,I V ;Date Initial/Date Initial/Date ............................ -——----- COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to forward Option I to the January 21, 2020 consent agenda for approval. Mark Koppang, Committee Chair Jesse Johnson,Committee Member Hoang Tran, Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move to authorize stuff.f to award the 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 project to Insitqfi)rm Technologies, LLC, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of$139,156.00 and approve a 10%contingency of$13,915.00 for a total Of$153,071.00, approve a budget transfer from Unallocated SWM CIP Funds in the amount of$70,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) .......... COUNCIL ACTION: 11 APPROVED COUNCIL BILL 11 DENIED First reading 11 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# ............ REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# 33 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM ............ ................ DATE: January 6, 2020 TO: Land Use&Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: EJ Walsh,P.E., Director of Public Woi-kSAVZ-� Kent Smith, P.E., Senior Capital Etigincer,,,�� SUBJECT: 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2—Bid Award .......................................... ............. Financial Impacts: The cost to the City for the 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase I and Phase 2 was authorized under the 2017 Surface Water Management (SWM) CIP budget update (304, Project 288) with an estimated budget of $100,000. SWM staff requested additional funding for this project as the cost of the pipe rehabilitation is higher than originally estimated. Under the 2019 budget adjustment, SWM has requested a transfer of $79,000 from the remaining balance of the recently completed Lakota Wetland Berm Repair project (304, Project 283) to this project. In addition, staff is requesting an additional transfer of $70,000 from unallocated SWM CIP to bring the total to $249,000.00. Most in house design and construction engineering is budgeted out of 401 operating budget at $21,323. In accordance with the approved budget, this item is funded by SWM Utility Tax. Upon completion of this project, ongoing costs associated with operations and maintenance will be performed and funded through Public Works Department Surface Water Management maintenance. Funding requirements for operations and maintenance of infrastructure is reviewed and adjusted as required during the budget process. PROJECT EXPENDITURES: Engineering $15,000.00 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase I Construction $87,252.00 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 Construction $139,156.00 10%Phase 2 Construction Contingency $13,915.00 ConstructionEngineering $15,000.00 .......... Total Project Costs $270,323.00 LUTC Memorandum AVAILABLE FUNDING: Budgeted by 2017 SWM CIP Update $100,000.00 Budgeted 401 Fund Salaries $21,323.00 SWM Unallocated CIP Transfer $70,000.00 SWM Fund 304 Transfer $79,000,00 Total Available Funding $270,323.00 Background Information: This project will repair deteriorated storm water pipes. These pipes were identified by the 2018 Storm Drain CCTV Inspection and Assessment project. Rev.6/2019 34 January 6,2020 Land Use and Transportation Committee 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 Bid Award Page 2 The 2018 Storm Drain CCTV Inspection and Assessment project started in 2018. The goal of the project is to proactively inspect storm drain assets and identify maintenance and repair needs before they cause flooding and/or other damage. The project has identified numerous deteriorated pipes that are in need of repair. The project for repairing these deteriorated pipes has been divided into two phases. Phase 1 has been completed for the pipes that must be repaired with the open cut method. Phase 2 will repair the pipes with a more cost effective trenchless method. Three bids were received and opened on December 10, 2019 for the 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 project; please see attached Bid Tabulation Summary. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Insituform Technologies, LLC, with a total bid of$139,156.00. Staff reviewed the bids received. As all the bids were relatively close in cost staff believes that the City is unlikely to receive better bids if the project was to be rebid. Staff recommends awarding the 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 2 project to Insituform Technologies, LLC, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $139,156.00 and approve a 10% contingency of$13,915.00 for a total of$153,071.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 a 0 c 0� 0. 0. q q "� q '=� , q 9 0 9 0, c� q q 8 0 0 0 0 H q q 0 0 0 a J 0 0 0 1 1 o o o6 0 0 rq lyi Ci 00. q Iq w o o. E o O o o c o o o, o o o o o o oc q o q o 1 '6 C� ro F- -- ---- ---- ca clj o o c c c o o o o c�l c o o o o o c 8 o 8 < c q c q q q o o C� o q� o c o o o a O c c c o o M o m 6 6 1 1 q q . . c! o o o c o o o I � I I J I o a 4 4 w cL n E A o of E rn < Q o o o o < .2 Ln o o o o c c c oio o o o In N ib to o c '4 N q, . 1 o om O1 lc O a � w , o c c� lc� C� m 't "T c� .1 CL 't I ll� C� N 'T'Iq It, ol N rV M m o (u 'a < vw cl u o o o o c o o o o o 0 c� o . . , , o o o O � o6 N m M l0 pi o m o u o o o z . . .............. .... ......... < Li < u Z u .............. o E u O o M. o u o ,a uut u > -u uu I > 7 o 2 —Mium re a. ir c F- o P. u I -o n E EN i > -c' o o u� u 2 o u % , I o' - u n v ol u u 1 -o o E o o o o u u �t a��-a m r` mLL I I m I yr w I COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL PARK PARKING RESTRICTIONS AND TOW AWAY ZONES POLICY QUESTION: Should the Council authorize the installation of parking restriction and tow away zone signs along S 3415'Pl, 18"'PI S, and 21 st Ave S? COMMITTEE: Land Use&Transportation Committee MEETING DATE: Jan. 6, 2020 CATEGORY: ® Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing City Council Business E Resolution ❑ Other STAFF REPORT BY: Jason Kennedy, Sr. Traffic Engincer DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Memo Map of Proposed Option (Option 1 as voted on via balloting) Options Considered: 1. Authorize the installation of parking restriction and tow away zone signs along S 341st Pl, 18"PI S, and 21s'Ave S. 2. Do not authorize the installation of parking restriction and tow away zone signs along S 3411` Pl, 18th Pl S, and 2111 Ave S. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: MAYOR APPROVAL: DI � ��.... __... .. .........._...�........ RECTOR APPROVAL: +� 1 C rttt¢nr,� �.ataorri�atigiseRt�r6. Initial/Date Initial/:Jake COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: I move to ,forward � �mmmm_mmmmmmmmmmmmmm m to the (fill in date) consent agenda for approval. ....am Mark �� o pan Hoa Committee Chair Jesse Johnson Committee Member ��tn TTran,CCommitteee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION: "I move approval qj " MONONA ---(.BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# _................ 37 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: January 6, 2020 ITmmm TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: EJ Walsh, P.E., Public Works Director Jason Kennedy, Senior Traffic Engin cc SUBJECT: Industrial Park Parking Restriction. and Away Zones (south of South 336th east of 16t' South,west of I-5, north of South 348th) FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This project is not part of the Neighborhood Traffic Safety (NTS) Program because this is not a residential location. Additionally, it is estimated that 2020 NTS funds will be used by residential traffic calming projects currently in the program queue. The estimated cost of this project is approximately $11,000, which includes sign materials and King County Road Services Division time to fabricate and install signs, and City staff time to plan and review. Public Works may have the opportunity to fund and conduct the work for this project with its 2021 operational budget. However this is dependent on the availability of unprogrammed operational funds, as this particular project is currently not a line item in the budget. BACKGROUND: City of Federal Way Public Works staff and Federal Way Police hosted a meeting with business community members held on September 19, 2019, to discuss on-street parking issues in the industrial park area south of South 336th Street, east of 16th Avenue South, west of I-5, and north of South 3481' Street. Property and business owners communicated their concern about the high volume of vehicles, including large commercial vehicles, parking on- street and restricting sight distance at driveways. These parked vehicles cause increased delay for traffic passing through the area and also reduces the availability of parking for business employees and their customers. Vehicles have parked in the road ("double-parking") due to the lack of available legal parking, as well as in front of driveways, mailboxes, and other assets that need to be clear of vehicles. PROPOSAL: Based on these concerns, Option 1 (below) was developed to implement parking restrictions and tow away zones to reduce the number of parked vehicles along industrial park area streets. Option I—Parking Restrictions and Tow Away Zone This option would include the installation of the following signs as show on the attached figure: 0 "NO PARKING" and "TOW-AWAY ZONE" signs on the south side of S 341"Place, between 161h Avenue S and 20"Avenue S r "NO PARKING" and "TOW-AWAY ZONE" signs on the east side of 18th Place S, between S 340th Street and S 341St Place • "NO PARKING VEHICLES OVER 30,000 POUNDS" and "TOW-AWAY ZONE" signs on both sides of 21St Avenue S • "10 HOUR PARKING" and "TOW-AWAY ZONE" signs on north side of S 34151 Place, between 161h Avenue S and 20th Avenue S "10 HOUR PARKING" and "TOW-AWAY ZONE" signs on the west side of I S'Place S, between S 340" Street and S 341 s1 Place + The proposed signing should be effective in reducing parked vehicles where they have caused issues. Option 2—No Action This option would not install parking restriction and tow away zone signs. 38 Advisory Ballot City staff sent a total of 76 ballots to property owners and occupants within 600 feet (measured along the road centerline) of the proposed parking restrictions and tow away zone locations. The table below summarizes the incomplete ballot results for the 11 ballots received to-date (17%return rate): 2019 Industrial Parr.Parkin2 Restriction/Tow ► a Zone Ballot Results Option Description Total Percent 1 Parking Restrictions and Tow Away Zone 11 85% 2No Action 2 15% The Traffic Division staff proposal is in accordance with the balloting results in recommending Option 1. The exact locations of the parking restrictions and tow away zone signs will be determined by Traffic Division and Police staff to ensure proper placement for enforceability. The proposed package should be effective in reducing delay for through traffic passing through the area and improve parking availability for business employees and their customers. cc: Project File Day File enclz Map ofoption 1 39 y k " Ili s Parity � nuly(,�( � Nt�itrt�nnii W�7µl� 9/ CLI ul 4-1 i Iv i G�/du� 0 rr r r i t � i i1i 11 tll i!Nn ��'RY�I rr r Inli O ra 1 Q e / V V) r uj v r � a fCS � r o ��l = m J V.j N 4 J v > c N a o l 4 'S W p ?0 c w � 1 16 s D CY a O a � r 2 w io r, COUNCIL MEETING DATE: N/A ITEM #: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL gem SUBJECT:THE RIDGE RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION—INFORMATION ONLY POLICY QUESTION: N/A COMMITTEE: LUTC MEETING DATE: Jan 6, 2020 CATEGORY: Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business ❑ Resolution ❑ Other � ....... ...... ............. ........_ _......... .. ..._.. STAFF REPORT BY: EJ Walsh, Public Works Director DEPT: Public Works Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: N/A MAYOR'S I@T°.CONI7iIMEN "ION: N/A �r nuweeC r .. MAYOR APPROVAL' DIRECTOR APPROVAL: _ur fiti� lrl .iz1 .... -rl►q Nawotl�u.�N/Dsutia Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A Mark leo)2aIICo]I"1ITI1ele�"`Chair Jesse Johnson,Committee Member Hoaii 'Fran,(.,oinrnittee Membea�mmmmIT e PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION:N/A (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION; , .............._.�_ ..w..__.....�. ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading mm ❑ TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading ......................... ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# 41 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: January 6, 2020 TO: Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: EJ Walsh, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: The Ridge Right of Way Dedication—Information Only FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are two separate financial components as follows: 2020 Overlay Program: The Ridge Home Owner's Association has funded the Engineering Estimate for the schedule in the amount of$558,897.71. On-Going Maintenance Costs: Dedication will increase the lane miles and overall responsibilities of Public Works. No increase in budget for either streets maintenance or winter operations is requested or anticipated to be requested solely as a result of the dedication. BACKGROUND: When the original development was platted under King County, some of the roads were dedicated as public streets while others remained private and the responsibility of the Home Owner's Association. Several years ago, the Ridge Home Owner's Association approached the City about dedication of the remaining private roads within Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 5. Per City Code, to accept dedication, the roads must meet current City requirements. The Ridge HOA and the City reached the agreement that the City would include the improvements to the streets within the 2020 Overlay Program with The Ridge Home Owner's Association funding the work. The work includes upgrades to ADA facilities, curbing, base repairs, overlaying of targeted areas, etc. and will be included as its own schedule within the 2020 Overlay request for bids. With the dedication, the City will assume the same responsibilities for the newly dedicated streets as other streets within the City. In accordance with City Code and Policy dedication of Right of Way is administrative and delegated to the Public Works Director. No Council action is required. 42 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: N/A ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RILL SUBJECT:REPORT ON PROGRESS WITH AIRCRAFT ISSUES POLICY QUESTION: None COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation MEETING DATE: December 6, ...2020...................................... ....................... CATEGORY: ❑ Consent ❑ Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business llesolll X Other STAFF REPORT BY. Bill V�adlnc,PtallcmmmmAdvisorm DEPT: Mayor's Office Attachments: Staff Report Options Considered: N/A MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: N/A It A MAYOR APPROVAL:. _ �.._.�.............. ................... .. DIRECTO.R _...��www�.� APPROVAL: N/A (r^art 111 tee Council Initial/Date IutdgiBltJateInitial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A Mark Koppang,Committee Chair Jesse Johnson, Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION:N/A (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading --,,,, ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# 43 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: January 6, 2020 TO: Land Use &Transportation Committee(LUTC) VIA: Jim Ferrell, Mayor FROM: Bill Vadino, Policy Advis r SUBJECT: Report on progress with airport issues BACKGROUND: The LUTC will be briefed on airport issues including: • Update on the Washington State Department of Commerce study on Sea-Tac Airport impacts. • Update on proposed aviation related State and Federal legislation. • Update on UW Ultrafine Particles Study. • Update on suspension from StART. • Monthly review of the Quiet and Healthy Skies Initiatives tracking report. 44 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: N/A ITEM#: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CONTINUING DISCUSSION ON PANHANDLING SIGNAGE POLICY QUESTION: Should the city install signs to discourage panhandling? COMMITTEE: Land Use and Transportation MEETING DATE: January ...6...2020........................................................................ CATEGORY: ❑ Consent Ordinance ❑ Public Hearing ❑ City Council Business Resol,tlti X Other �6666�6 _ 66 .�� d�dd�w�a��dddddddw 66666 STAFF REPORT BY: Bill Vadt tl,Poky Advisor � DEPT: Mayor's Office Staff report attached. MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION: N/A MAYOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR APPROVAL: N/A 4uaunn tc Council Initial/Date Initial/Date Initial/Date COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:N/A Mark Ko ang,Committee Chair Jesse Johnson, Committee Member Hoang Tran,Committee Member PROPOSED COUNCIL MOTION:N/A (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ APPROVED COUNCIL BILL# ❑ DENIED First reading ❑ TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading . _ ❑ MOVED TO SECOND READING(ordinances only) ORDINANCE# REVISED—12/2017 RESOLUTION# 45 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: January 6, 2019 TO: Land Use &Transportation Committee(LUTC) VIA: Jim Ferrell,Mayor FROM: Bill Vadino, Policy Advisor SUBJECT: Continuing Discussion on panhandling signage and other options BACKGROUND: At the December 2nd meeting, the Land Use and Transportation Committee was briefed on signage to discourage panhandling. This discussion will continue at the January 6, 2020 meeting. • Cost of signs is approximately$500 each for fabrication and installation by King County, • The attached map proposes locations for a total of 20 signs including: o Pacific Highway S. and Dash Point Way(1) o Pacific Highway S. and 320th(4) o S.3201h St. and 23rd Ave. S. (2) o Pacific Highway S. and 15th Ave. S.(1) o Pacific Highway S. and S. 348"'St(4) o Pacific Highway S. and 16th Ave. S. (4) o SW Campus Drive and 21St Ave. SE(4) • Total cost of this project for 20 signs would be approximately $10,000. • Attached are examples from the City of Lakewood and an example of a sign with the message of "It's okay to say no to panhandlers." • Locally, the City of Lakewood installed 18 in May 2018 and reports a drop-off in panhandling at those locations. • As there is a high probability of theft, tagging and vandalism, it is suggested to have funding for repair and replacement. • Those in social services, including our city community development team, believes that while the signs send a message to panhandlers, it also stigmatizes those who are legitimately in need. • The Mayor's recommendation is to not implement this signage. He believes that the signage sends a harsh and negative message to residents, those who work in the city, businesses that would potentially build or relocate businesses to the city as well as tourists. The signs also insult citizens who legitimately want to donate to the homeless. In summary, he believes that "our city is better than this. We should take this money and help the homeless with it." 46 Page 2 Map of proposed locations: s , � R .o , , a, Al P+�Cr.'.w puN�G4A , All P"Wlw a r 4r a�r4 y�q�yi s Iyr vim 0 4„r d�f v m ��/r« 1Wd@f1M �n.w b u "•%N aV.Mv I. a ow n X 0 1 vumw mmmn Examples from(left to right) Lakewood,WA and Dublin, Ohio, ?PANHANDLING NSAY NO TOan is I's to 8: iv Ind to t CONTRIBUTE TO fff °« ofu II�IIIII� �ofAW 11. THE SOLUTION �t GIVE TO LOCAL CHARITIES 47