Cultural Resources Report CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET
Author: Brett R. Lenz
TITLE OF REPORT: CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE DANILCHIK PLAT, FEDERAL WAY,
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Date of Report: June 20, 2019
County(ies): King Section: 4 Township: 21N Range: 3E
Quad: Des Moines 7.5 Acres: 22
PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes
Historic Property Inventory Forms to be Approved Online? Yes No
Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? Yes No
TCP(s) found? Yes No
Replace a draft? Yes No
Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? Yes # No
DAHP Archaeological Site #:
2
CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE DANILCHIK PLAT, FEDERAL WAY,
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
By Brett R. Lenz, PhD
and
Andrew Murphy, MS, RPA
Prepared for
American Classic Homes
Mercer Island, Wa
Prepared by
Columbia Geotechnical Associates, Inc.
16541 Redmond Way, Suite 244C
Redmond, WA 98052
CGA Report 192019
June 20, 2019
3
ABSTRACT
Prior to the development of a new subdivision located in Federal Way, American Family Homes
contracted with Columbia Geotechnical Associates (CGA) to produce a cultural resource
assessment on two parcels of land at 30231 20th Ave S, (King County Parcels # 0421049012 and
0421049221) in King County, Washington (Figure 1). King County and the State of Washington
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP; RCW27.53) stipulate that cultural
resource investigations must be completed prior to the granting of any permits related to
ground disturbance due to the potential for cultural resources to exist in the project area. This
report is intended to meet these requirements and facilitate the project moving forward in
compliance. Based on the results of this overview, the chance of impacting cultural resources as
a result of any ground disturbing activity is effectively zero. CGA recommends no further
consideration of cultural resources at the project location.
4
Introduction
Project Description
This report presents the results of a cultural resource assessment for a new development
located 30231 20th Ave S, (King County Parcels # 0421049012 and 0421049221) in King County,
Washington as shown on the project location map (Figure 1). The project proponent proposes to
subdivide an approximately 22 acre site consisting of two tax parcels into approximately 66
single family lots. An on-site wetland and stream will be retained, along with a critical area
buffer. The project sits in an upland setting, a formerly glaciated plain with an incised perennial
drainage in its valley floor.
Cultural resources research included a review of the historic and archaeological site files at the
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) in Olympia, WA, a review of local
GLO maps and files, a literature review, a physical field survey, and the production of this report.
Columbia Geotechnical Associates, Inc. (CGA) background research identified archaeological
sites in the vicinity of the project. The following report describes the process and outcome of
our investigation.
Location and Legal Description
The project site is located within the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 4,
Township 20 North, Range 3 East, Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington (Figures 1, 2).
The property is in an upland setting, covering 22 acres.
Environmental and Cultural Setting
Overview
Knowledge of the geologic processes associated with the landforms in this area can assist in
locating archaeological resources. The mapped parent material immediately underlying the
project consists of reworked glacial sediment in a recessional environment with a thin veneer of
post-glacial sediment. Deposition of Holocene sediments filled post-glacial incision beginning
upstream from the project area, continuing through to its drainage mouth at Poverty Bay. This
depositional setting ensures that archaeological sites lie within the thin Holocene veneer
sediments and should be easy to identify.
Climate and Biota
The project is located within the Western Hemlock vegetation zone (J.F. Franklin and C.T.
Dyrness 1988). The inland landscape has not changed significantly over the last 7,000 years. The
recent to modern climate in the project vicinity is temperate, with moderate, relatively dry
summers and mild, cool winters.
The natural vegetation of the area has been modified to varying degrees by logging, agriculture,
and urban development since the mid 1800s. Historically, the area was covered with dense
forests consisting of Douglas fir, western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), western red cedar
(Thuja plicata), big-leaf maple (Acer amplum), red alder (Alnus rubra), willow (Salix L.), and vine
maple (Acer circinatum Pursh). Ferns, mosses, salal (Gaultheria shallon), Oregon grape (Mahonia
aquifolium), ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor), snowberry (Symphoricarpos), wild rose (Rosa L.),
red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium), blackberry (Rubus Eubatus), and salmonberry (Rubus
spectabilis) were abundant (J.F. Franklin and C.T. Dyrness 1988).
5
Figure 1. Tacoma North 7.5 quad map highlighting Project location (Black polygon).
6
Where available, these plants continue to support a diverse range of fauna. While few species
thrive in the area today, the historic period landscape would have supported a greater number
of plants and animals. Black-tailed deer (O. hemionus columbianus), bear (Ursus americanus),
bobcat (felis rufus), cougar (Puma concolor), wolf (Canis lupus), elk (Cervus elaphus), raccoon
(Procyon lotor), skunk (Mephitis), beaver (Castor Canadensis), pheasants (Phasianus colchicus
torquatus), waterfowl, heron (Cochlearius cochlearius), salmon and trout (Oncorhynchus) are
some of the resources common to the area.
Figure 2. Overview of project within tree canopy (Towards west).
Pre-History of Project Area
The first human occupation of Washington State may date back about 14,000 years to the Manis
Mastodon site at Sequim, where a possible bone point and the spirally fractured bones of a
mastodon suggest human hunting and butchering (Gustafson et al. 1979). The next phase of
human occupation in Washington was between 13,000 and 13,500 years ago and referred to as
7
the Clovis culture. There have been a few isolated locales in southern and central Puget Sound,
but no campsite of this culture has yet been found in Washington. Following the Clovis period,
there are the Early (approximately 12,000 to 7,000 years ago), then the Middle (7,000 to 3,500
years ago) and Late (3,500 to 150 years ago) periods. Sites deposited during the Early period,
typically occur on high marine and river terraces, sometimes at a significant distance from
modern water courses, and consist of concentrations of cobble cores, flakes, large ovate knives,
and broad-stemmed and leaf-shaped projectile points (Wessen 1990).
Eustatic Sea Level rise continued through the Early period into the Middle period, eventually
stabilizing between 7-5 thousand years ago. This period of time marks a significant shift in the
overall environmental scheme which allowed for the establishment of a concentrated littoral
adaptation. Archaeological evidence defining this period is seen in significant, widely spread
changes in subsistence economy and residential patterns. Few, yet persistent lanceolate points,
not uncommon in Olcott assemblages are present during this time and ground stone, bone and
antler tools, and smaller, triangular projectile points are common.
During the Late Period (3,500 to 150 years ago) human lifeways changed radically, as people
focused increasingly on aquatic resources; the number and diversity of sites markedly increased.
People maintained permanent villages on the coast and along the lower reaches of inland rivers
(Chatters 1989; 1990). They used these as home bases and storage warehouses for fish,
shellfish, game, and plant foods systematically gathered during the warmer seasons. Shell-
middens built up in coastal settings (Grabert 1988). Cemeteries are found adjacent to larger
villages, midden sites, and fishing camps and petroglyph sites occasionally occur in higher
upland environments. Small camps, left by hunters, fishers, plant gatherers, and traders are
found from the lowlands well into the mountains, but usually remain close to larger, permanent
sources of water. Typically, these sites are located along trade routes that linked communities
living east and west of the Cascades (Burtchard 2003). Open, temporary camps, occurring as
lithic scatters, are common in these settings. Blazed cedars, stripped of bark in order to make
basketry or with planks removed from the base of their trunks, are still found in the lowlands
(Gunther 1973).
Ethnographic Context
The native occupants of the project area were the Lushootseed-speaking Salish peoples who
shared ties with other Puget Sound cultures (Suttles and Lane 1990). This area was utilized by
several specific groups including the Shotlemamish, Puyallup, and the Suquamish. The Puyallup
Tribe claim the traditional territory in the project area proper (Spier 1936; Suttles and Lane
1990). Records held at DAHP, indicate that no cultural resources are recorded on or in the
immediate vicinity of the Ellingson property. Regardless, the Puyallup lived in villages between
the Puyallup River and Mount Rainier, along the Puyallup, Carbon and Stuck rivers.
These coastal people relied on a diet of fish, roots, berries, and wild game. There is evidence to
suggest a marginal difference in diet between coast-dwelling groups of Puget Sound and the
more inland peoples who lived along rivers with the latter group focusing more on upland game
animals instead of marine resources. (Smith 1941, Bryan 1963, Nelson 1990).
Smith (1940) reports the Muckleshoot traveling to the beaches at Redondo and Adelaide by
overland trails near the project and Ballard (1929) reports that the Muckleshoot fished for
8
salmon at Peasley Canyon. Closer to the project, the place name associated with Dolloff Lake is
interpreted as "where there are whales" (Waterman 1920).
Historic Context
The first record of Puget Sound was made by Peter Puget, a Second Lieutenant of Captain
George Vancouver’s expedition in 1792. But it wasn’t until the Wilkes expedition in 1841 that
the project area, including a number of the local river mouths were mapped. Europeans began
settling the area four years later. The local timber industry was established with a water-
powered mill in 1852, which was soon after followed by Euroamerican development of the
project area. Rapid development by Euroamericans severely impacted the local people, causing
them to be “relocated” to the Puyallup, Muckleshoot and Squaxin Island reservations under the
Medicine Creek Treaty.
The project area grew rapidly over the course of the next several decades. With the advent of
railroads into the area, connecting other local transportation routes helped create reliable
modes of import and export of goods. Dredging of the local waterways facilitated using them for
commerce; Sediments from the dredging were used to build up the local waterfront, which
allowed for even greater expansion.
The project area proper was settled by non-native people in the late 1800s. One of the earliest
non-native families to settle the area were the Webbs who came to Federal Way in 1890. The
Webb family purchased a 120 acre parcel at the location of “The Commons”, formerly the Sea
Tac mall. The Webb family used the land as a cattle ranch until the 1950s when commercial
development moved into the area. Because of the Webb family farm, Federal Way was originally
referred to as “Webb Center”. After development of Highway 99, which was federally-funded,
the area became known as “Federal Way”. The Danilchik property is one of the last plots of
undeveloped land in the area.
Methodology
Review of Pertinent Literature and Map Resources
Prior to field investigations, CGA conducted a records review and literature search for the
Ellingson property based partly on records kept at the Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation (DAHP) in Olympia, Washington. CGA staff researched archaeological site forms,
cultural resource reports, modern and historic maps, historic inventory forms, and National
Register of Historic Places nomination forms as they apply to the project area.
Field Methods
CGA Principal Brett Lenz initiated the physical field assessment of the property to identify any
readily observable surficial cultural materials or features. Exposure of surface geology is good,
with glacial material present in tree-falls and local ground disturbances. CGA field archaeologists
completed a 100% walkover survey along transects that were spaced no greater than 5 meters
apart. This was followed by a subsurface survey consisting of systematic shovel probes placed
no greater than 10 meters apart.
9
Results
Recorded Archaeological Resources and Project Expectations
A review of records kept by the DAHP show a distinct lack of archaeological sites in the project
vicinity, likely due in part to a low incidence of cultural resource survey work. The closest
archaeological sites are 45KI3, a burial and campsite at Redondo beach one mile to the west and
45KI297, a demolished log cabin two miles to the east of the project site. Based on patterns of
prehistoric, ethnographic and historic settlement and land use in this area, identifying
archaeological resources associated with vert late prehistoric cultural occupation periods and
historic sites associated with historic development was considered a moderate probability.
Field Survey
The fieldwork for the current assessment was conducted on June 14, 15 and 16, 2019. CGA
archaeologist Brett Lenz, Andrew Murphy and Danielle Clingman completed the field
assessment. As a result of the project location within a forested area, on-site vegetation was
heavey and ground surface visibility was poor; however, exposed sediments were limited across
the project area, restricted to small, disturbed portions of land along the sloped areas of the
project. After the surface survey we conducted a comprehensive shovel probe survey placing
123 probes across the project (Figure 3, Table 1).
Conclusions and Recommendations
Investigation of the project site resulted in the observation of no cultural materials identified.
None of the structures present on the property meet the historic age threshold, and no other
cultural resources were found as a result of the survey. CGA recommends no further
consideration of cultural resources as a result of our survey.
If ground disturbing or other construction activities result in the inadvertent discovery of buried
archaeology, the development work should cease, and immediate contact should be made with
the appropriate Tribal contacts, as well as the Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation in Olympia.
10
Figure 3. Shovel probe locations. Transects are oriented from east (right) to west (left).
See Table 1 for shovel probe descriptions.
11
References
Ames, Kenneth M., Don E. Dumond, Jerry R. Galm, and Rick Minor (1998) Prehistory of the
Southern Plateau. In Plateau, edited by Deward E. Walker Jr., pages 103-119. Volume 12
Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, General Editor. Smithsonian
Institution, Washington D.C.
Boas, Franz and James Teit (1930). The Salishan Tribes of the Western Plateau. Lancaster,
Pennsylvania and New York: Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology 45:23-197,
295-396, 447-758
Bouchard, Randall T. and Dorothy I.D. Kennedy (1984). Indian History and Knowledge of the
Lower Similkameen River - Palmer Lake Area, Okanogan County, Washington: Report prepared
for USACOE Seattle District.
Bryan, Alan L. (1963). An archaeological survey of northern Puget Sound. Occasional Papers of
the Idaho State University Museum No. 11. Idaho State University Museum, Pocatello Idaho.
Burtchard, Greg C. (2003). Environment, Prehistory & Archaeology of Mount Rainier National
Park, Washington.
Butler, B. Robert (1961). The Old Cordilleran Culture in the Pacific Northwest. Occasional Papers
of the Idaho State College Museum, No. 5. Idaho State College, Pocatello.
Chance, David H. and Jennifer Chance (1985) Kettle Falls 1978: Further Archaeological
Excavations in Lake Roosevelt. University of Idaho Anthropological Reports No. 84. Alfred W.
Bowers Laboratory of Anthropology, Moscow.
Cannon, Michael D. and David J. Meltzer. (2004). Early Paleoindian foraging: examining the
faunal evidence for large mammal specialization and regional variability in prey choice:
Quaternary Science Reviews 23
Carlson, Roy. (1990). Cultural Antecedents. In Northwest Coast, Handbook of North American
Indians. W. Settles, ed. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press. Vol. 7.
Cole, Douglas and David Darling. (1990). “History of the early period.” In Handbook of North
American Indians. Vol. 7. Northwest Coast. pp.119-134. Ed. Wayne Suttles. Smithsonian
Institution, Washington D.C.
Easterbrook, D.J. (1994a) Chronology of pre-late Wisconsin Pleistocene sediments in the Puget
Lowland, Washington, in Lasmanis, R., and Cheney, E.S., eds., Regional geology of Washington
State: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Bulletin 80, 191-206.
Fladmark, Knut. (1982) An Introduction to the Prehistory of British Columbia. Canadian Journal
of Archaeology 6:95-156.
Franklin, J.F., and C.T. Dyrness. (1988). Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Corvallis,
Oregon: Oregon State University Press.
12
Gramly, Richard Michael. (1991). The Richey Clovis cache; Persimmon Press, Buffalo, NY
Gustafson, C. E., Dilbow, and R. Daugherty. (1979). The Manis mastadon site: Early man on the
Olympic Peninsula. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 3:157-164.
Harrison, E. M. (1951). Archaeological Site Inventory Form for 45IS8. Site record on file with the
WashingtonState Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Olympia.
Honey, William, John A. Draper, and Sandra Snyder (1979). A Survey and Evaluation of Cultural
Resources Phase I of the Oroville-Tonasket Unit Extension, Department of Anthropology Oregon
State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
Huckleberry, Gary, Lenz, Brett R., Gough, Stan and Jerry Galm, (2003). Recent geoarchaeological
discoveries in central Washington: GSA Field Guide 4: Western Cordillera and Adjacent Areas pp.
237–249
Kennedy, Dorothy, and Randall T. Bouchard, (1998). In Plateau, Handbook of North American
Indians. W. Settles, ed. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press. Vol. 12.
Kincade, M. Dale, Elmendorf, William W., Rigsby, Bruce and Haruo Aoki, (1998). Languages. In
Plateau, Handbook of North American Indians. W. Settles, ed. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian
Institution Press. Vol. 12.
Kirk, Ruth and Carmela Alexander. (1990). Exploring Washington’s past: a road guide to history.
University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash.
Lenz, Brett R. (2006). Geoarchaeology of the Richey Clovis cache, east Wenatchee, Washington.
Paper presented at the 2006 American Quaternary Meetings, Boseman, MT.
Lenz, Brett R. (In prep). Initial colonization of the Columbia Plateau, Pacific Northwest, USA.
doctoral dissertation, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester,
United Kingdom.
Leonhardy, Frank C. and David G. Rice. (1970). A Proposed Culture Typology for the Snake River
Region of Southeastern Washington. Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 4(1):1-29.
Moscow.
Lewarch, Dennis E. and James R. Benson. (1989). Prehistoric upland land use in the Yakima Folds
Region of the Western Columbia Plateau. Archaeology in Washington 1:31-47.
Matson, D.G., and G. Copeland. (1995). Prehistory of the northwest coast. San Diego California:
Academic Press.
Meany, Edmond S. (1910) History of the State of Washington. The Macmillan Company, New
York.
Mehringer, P. J., Jr. (1985). Age of the Clovis cache at east Wenatchee, Washington. Report to
the Washington State Preservation Office. On file, Department of Anthropology, Washington
State University, Pullman.
13
Morgan, V.E. (1999). The SR-1-1 Sequim bypass archaeological project: Mid- to Late-Holocene
occupation on the Olympic Peninsula, Clallam County, Washington. Reports in Archaeology and
History. No. 100-108. Cheney, Washington: Eastern Washington University.
Nelson, Charles M. (1969) The Sunset Creek Site (45-KT-28) and its Place in Plateau Prehistory.
Laboratory of Anthropology Report of Investigation 47(or 46), Washington State University,
Pullman.
Pokotylo, D. L. and D. Mitchell (1998) Prehistory of the Northern Plateau. In Handbook of North
American Indians, Volume 12, Plateau, edited by D. E. Walker, pp. 81 - 102. Smithsonian
Institution, Washington D. C.
Ray, Verne (1939). Cultural relations in the Plateau of Northwestern America. Publications of the
Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund 2. Los Angeles: Southwestern Museum.
Richards, Thomas H. and Michael K. Rousseau. (1987). Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the
Canadian Plateau. Department of Archaeology Publication No. 16. Simon Fraser University,
Burnaby, British Columbia.
Speir, Leslie. (1938). The Sinkaietk or Southern Okanogan of Washington. General Series in
Anthropology 6; Contributions from the Laboratory of Anthropology 2. Menasha, Wis.: George
Banta.
Teit, James A. (1930). The Salishan Tribes of the Western Plateaus. Franz Boas ed.. Pp. 23-396 in
45th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for 1927 to 1928. Washington.
14
TABLE 1. Shovel Probe Data
Probe #Levels (cmbs)Texture Comments Probe #Levels (cmbs)Texture Comments
1 0-10 duff No CR 8 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
2 0-10 duff No CR 9 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
3 0-10 duff Plastic bag 10 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
4 0-10 duff No CR 11 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
5 0-10 duff No CR 12 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel
"Tab" soda
can
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
6 0-10 duff No CR 13 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
7 0-10 duff No CR 14 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
15
TABLE 1. Shovel Probe Data (Continued)
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs)
Texture
Comments
15 0-10 duff No CR 22 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 50 Greyish
sand loam
No CR
16 0-10 duff No CR 23 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
17 0-10 duff No CR 24 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
18 0-10 duff No CR 25 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
19 0-10 duff No CR 26 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 0-10 duff No CR 27 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
21 0-10 duff No CR 28 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
16
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments
29 0-10 duff No CR 36 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 0-10 duff No CR 37 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
31 0-10 duff No CR 38 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
32
0-10
duff No CR 39
0-10
duff
Plastic;No
CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
33 0-10 duff No CR 40 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
34 0-10 duff No CR 41 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
20 to 50 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
35 0-10 duff No CR 42 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
17
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs)
Texture
Comments
43 0-10 duff No CR 50 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
44 0-10 duff No CR 51 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
20 to 50 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
45 0-10 duff Plastic bag 52 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
46 0-10 duff No CR 53 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
47 0-10 duff No CR 54 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 55 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
48 0-10 duff No CR 55 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 50 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
49 0-10 duff Red brick? 56 0-10 duff Plastic;No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
18
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments
57 0-10 duff No CR 64 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
58 0-10 duff No CR 65 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
59 0-10 duff No CR 66 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
60 0-10 duff No CR 67 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
61 0-10 duff No CR 68 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
62 0-10 duff No CR 69 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
20 to 50 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
63 0-10 duff No CR 70 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
19
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs)
Texture
Comments
71 0-10 duff No CR 78 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Ceramic;No
CR
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
72 0-10 duff No CR 79 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
73 0-10 duff No CR 80 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
74 0-10 duff No CR 81 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No Cr
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
75 0-10 duff No CR 82 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
76 0-10 duff No CR 83 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
77 0-10 duff No CR 84 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments
85 0-10 duff No CR 92 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
86 0-10 duff No CR 93 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
87 0-10 duff No CR 94 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
88 0-10 duff No CR 95 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 60 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
89 0-10 duff No CR 96 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
90 0-10 duff No CR 97 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
20 to 50 Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
91 0-10 duff No CR 98 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
21
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs)
Texture
Comments
99 0-10 duff No CR 106 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel Ceramic;No
CR
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
100 0-10 duff No CR 107 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
101 0-10 duff No CR 108 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
102 0-10 duff No CR 109 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No Cr
35 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
103 0-10 duff No CR 110 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
104 0-10 duff No CR 111 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 60 Gravelly
sand loam No CR
105 0-10 duff No CR 112 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel Mazama
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
22
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments
112 0-10 duff No CR 119 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
25 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
113 0-10 duff No CR 120 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
25 to 50
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
114 0-10 duff No CR 121 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
25 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Dark Greyi
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
115 0-10 duff No CR 122 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
25 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
116 0-10 duff No CR 123 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
25 to 50 Dark Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
117 0-10 duff No CR 124 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
25 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
118 0-10 duff No CR 125 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 25 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
25 to 50 Dark
Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
20 to 50 Greyish Dark
Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
23
Probe #
Levels
(cmbs) Texture Comments Probe #
Levels
(cmbs)
Texture
Comments
126 0-10 duff No CR 133 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 15 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
15 to 20 Dark Grey
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
127 0-10 duff No CR 134 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 15 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
15 to 20 Gark Grey
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
128 0-10 duff No CR 135 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 15 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Dark Grey
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
15 to 20 Dark Grey
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
129 0-10 duff No CR 136 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 35 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
10- to 15 Tan loam
+gravel No Cr
35 to 60
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
15 to 20 Dark Grey
Gravelly sand
loam No CR
130 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 30 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
30 to 60 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR 131 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50
Gravelly
sand loam No CR 32 0-10 duff No CR
10- to 20 Tan loam
+gravel No CR
20 to 50 Greyish
Gravelly
sand loam No CR
24