Loading...
5e - Pedestrian Safety ProgramPublic Works: LiatULA= Streets * Traffic • Development Services Solid Waste • Surface Water Management CIT Federal Wa Citywide Pedestrian Improvements Program Should the City Council authorize staff to proceed to design and build the 2016 Pedestrian Safety Program using the revised prioritization criteria and funds remaining from the 2015 project, and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award? 7/13/2021 2 CIT Federal Wa Program Goals Increase pedestrian safety and mobility at both existing and potential mid -block pedestrian crosswalk locations. Program Prioritization Method • 12 Criteria Established (40.5 Possible Points) • Criteria matrices developed to analyze: — Pedestrian Collision History Roadway Characteristics Potential Pedestrian Use Transit Ridership Cost Feasibility Potential Vehicular Safety Improvement 7/ 13/2021 tJ CIT Federal Wa Pedestrian Collision History Criteria • 10 years of collision history (2004-2013). • Point scale double that of other criteria. • 2 Criteria established — Pedestrian Collisions Pedestrian Fatality Collisions 7/ 13/2021 M CIT Federal Wa Pedestrian Collisions Crossing Major Street at Unsignalized Locations — 2005-2014 7/13/2021 CIT Federal Wa Roadway Cross -Section Criteria • Longer Crossings =potential vulnerability for pedestrians. • Excluded Roadway Sections: Pedestrian crossing greater than two lanes at one time: ❑ Only assuming restriping to incorporate pedestrian refuge island. Roadway cross -sections greater than 79 feet: ❑ Excluded from consideration. ❑ Crossing distance too great to provide proper safety with RRFB system. ❑ Only such locations have HOV lanes. 7/ 13/2021 CITY OF Fe d e ra I Wa Vehicular Traffic Volumes • Based upon Average Daily Traffic (ADT) per lane. • Higher traffic volumes =reduction in gaps =more need for pedestrian crossing countermeasures. 7/ 13/2021 7 CIT Federal Wa Distance to Nearest Marked Crosswalk • Alternate marked pedestrian crosswalks? • New crosswalks likely to generate more pedestrian traffic if placed where no alternates exist. • Installation of one location may affect the scoring of other nearby locations. • Staff does not recommend installations at all intersections in corridor segments. 7/ 13/2021 CIT Federal Wa Pedestrian Traffic Criteria • Locations which likely would be utilized by Greater pedestrian volumes. More vulnerable pedestrians. • Three Criteria Established School Frontage & Safe Walking Routes ❑ Priority given based upon youngest to oldest students. Parks, Recreation & Libraries ❑ Priority given to Largest City Parks and Facilities down to small private recreation facilities. — Roadways separating Land Uses ❑ Priority given to land uses which tend to yield more pedestrians from the City Center area down to Single 7/13/202, Family Residential. Increased score for Senior Housing. 9 CIT Federal Wa Transit Ridership Criteria • Ridership data obtained from King County Metro &Pierce Transit. • Two Transit Ridership Criteria established: • Ridership at existing/proposed crosswalk location • Ridership at other bus stops in nearby vicinity • No data available for KC Metro —DART 901 & 903 routes (assumptions made for average). • Coordination with Transit will occur to evaluate existing bus stop locations, if needed. 7/ 13/2021 10 CIT Federal Wa Cost Feasibility Criteria • Determine most cost effective locations. • Cost Evaluation included: RRFB System & Signage (Number of units needed?) Pedestrian Refuge Island Construction Curb Ramp Construction Crosswalk Striping Modifications to Existing Pavement Markings Possible need for Additional Street Lighting — Need for C-Curb installation 7/ 13/2021 11 CIT Federal Wa Additional Vehicular Safety Improvements Criteria • Additional 1.5 Points given to locations where installation could potentially address vehicular safety. • Such countermeasures could include: Restriping to provide: ❑ Two -Way Left Turn Lanes ❑ A Designated Bus Stop Pullout ❑ Right Turn Lane Addition of c-curb to: ❑ Reinforce existing signage restricting movements. ❑ Address turning movements to/from side streets which have existing safety concerns. 7/ 13/2021 12 CIT Federal Wa Evaluation of Locations • 77 locations evaluated Some locations dismissed due to: ❑ Sight Distance Requirements not met. ❑ Roadway Cross -Sections greater than 79 ft • Error found that reprioritized some locations • Proposing minimum score of 6.0 points 7/ 13/2021 13 CIT Federal Wa Existing and Proposed Locations 7/13/2021 City of Pedestrian Safety Program Federal Way Puge15'aottl Des Kent F�loines n2r�h s: A • a c i Yd � Federar Way Way eot = s3aamst PAA e O '� 6w I121h St � 052rh St I awns% 4 it 1 ' C• /,� � �I SIN 32eth S, � a 32•h s 2om st St � • m • _J; l J _ (I, _ J �G 3241h3t Federal < ntpd s 3361h St Legend 9 s sarnh.St City Gmds ; Pptental Annexation Area 3W3591ti$� fI Way Streets PAA nneriai 3 y � 3� ' `" � Calleaar ,p d E a F.,.y Freeway R.� Mac, 1, Local .k b Pedestrian Safety Program Status - 28 Completed ,Fv • Completed In 2015 Milton • Pmpaaaemrzo,a © Edgewood Q Fife Au atv or This map is intended for use t Federal Way o 0.5 1 Tas he graphical representation Miles The City of Federal Way makes tlerikelPWlTrafllclProjecfslTraHic INSgnalslh9apsV2apltlFlashirgArrews-mxd no warranty as to its accuracy. CIT Federal Wa Locations for 2015 Priority Number Proposed Installation Street Reference Location Total Points Preliminary Cost Estimate Actual Cost Recommended for Construction in 2015 1 1st Way S 1st Place S Northeast Leg 20.5 $22,500 $20,252 2 SW Dash Point Road SW 306 Street / 121h Avenue SW Southwest Leg 15.5 $23,500 $16,381 YTD 2 SW 3201h Street 361h Avenue SW 315 ft West 15.5 $22,250 $21,400 4 SW 320th Street SW 323rd Street 500 ft East 13.0 $27,250 $21,401 4 19th Avenue SW SW 340th Street 410 ft North 13.0 $21,500 $15,957 YTD 6 SW 320th Street 3rd Place SW 200 ft West 12.5 $42,513 $31,053 YTD 7 SW 330th Street West Campus Trail 12.0 $15,500 $7694 8 S 320th Street 5th Avenue S 220 ft West 11.5 $47,452 Not constructed 9 1st Way S S 340th Street 410 ft North 11.0 $37,996 Not constructed Sub -Total Schedules = $260,461 $134,138 YTD 10% Construction Contingency $26,046 $0 Construction Administration $45,251 $0 Printing of Advertisement $3,500 $1,834 Estimated Total $335,258 $135,972 2015 Budget $339,826 Remaining Balance / Carr orward $203,85 /l 1JlLVL1 CIT Federal Wa Proposed Locations for 2016 Priority Numbe r Proposed Installation Street Reference Location Total Points Preliminary Cost Estimate Recommended for Construction in 2016 1 21 St Avenue SW SW 322nd Place 200 ft South 12.5 $47,700 2 S 320t" Street 5t" Avenue S 200 ft West 11.5 $85,000 3 SW 320t" Street 18t" Avenue SW 200 ft East 10.5 $45,400 4 Military Rd S S 282nd Street 200 ft South 9.5 $33,500 5 SW 320t" Street 6t" Avenue SW 200 ft West 8.5 $45,200 5 Pete von Reichbauer Wy S S 320t" Street 575 ft North 8.5 $49,800 7 21 st Avenue SW SW 330t" Street 200 ft North 8.0 $40,500 7 SW 312t" Street 4t" Avenue SW 315 ft West 8.0 $25,800 Sub -Total Schedules = $372,900 10% Construction Contingency $37,290 Construction Administration $37,290 Printing of Advertisement $3,500 Estimated Total $450,980 2016 Budget $293,844 2015 Car orward $203,854 2016 Estimated Car orward $46,718 7/13/2021 16 CIT Federal Wa 2016 Proposed Schedule Begin Design: Ad: Construction: Propose 2017 projects: Upon adoption of the project list March 2016 May — October 2016 October 2016 7/13/2021 17 CIT Federal Wa Options 1. Authorize staff to proceed to design and build the 2016 Pedestrian Safety Program using the revised prioritization criteria and funds remaining from the 2015 project, and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award. 2. Do not accept prioritization criteria or bid the proposed 2016 projects and provide direction to staff. 7/ 13/2021 M CIT Federal Wa Mayor's Recommendation • Authorize staff to proceed to design and build the 2016 Pedestrian Safety Program using the revised prioritization criteria and funds remaining from the 2015 project, and return to the LUTC and Council for bid award. 7/ 13/2021 19 CIT Federal Wa Pedestrian Collision Histor-- V6 7/13/2021 Point Scale 10-Year Pedestrian Collision Histor y Total Fatal 0 - - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 1 5 5 - 6 6+ 2+ Criteria 20 CIT Federal Wa Roadway, Traffic and Crosswalk Location Criteria Point Scale Roadway & Traffic Crosswalks Roadway Crossing Width (ft) ** Average Daily Traffic (ADT/Lane) Distance to Nearest (ft) Existing Marked Crosswalk 0 0 - 24 0 - 1499 0 - 299 0.5 25 - 34 1500 - 2499 300 - 599 1 35 - 44 2500 - 3499 600 - 899 1.5 45 - 54 3500 - 4499 900 - 1199 2 55 - 64 4500 - 5499 1200 - 1499 2.5 65 - 74 5500 - 6499 1500 - 1799 3 75 - 79 6500+ 1800+ 7/13/2021 21 CIT Federal Wa Schools Criteria Point Scale School Frontage or Safe Walking Routes 0 - 0.5 Potential High School Walking Route 1 High School Frontage 1.5 Middle School Walking Route 2 Middle School Frontage 2.5 Designated Elementary School Safe Route 3 Elementary School Frontage 7/13/2021 22 CIT Federal Wa Parks. Recreation & Libraries Criteria Point Parks, Recreation & Libraries Scale 0 - 0.5 Private Indoor Recreational Facilities & Private Outdoor < 25 acres 1 FW Open Space < 25 acres & Private Outdoor Recreation > 25 acres 1.5 FW Open Space > 25 acres & State Parks/Lands 2 Dumas Bay Center, Senior Center, KC Aquatic Center & Weyerhaeuser Trails 2.5 FW Neighborhood Parks 3 FW Community Parks, FW Designated Trails, FW Community Center & KC Libraries 7/13/2021 23 CIT Federal Wa Land Use Criteria Point Scale Roadway Separating Land Uses 0 - 0.5 Single Family Residential Only 1 Multi -Family Residential 1.5 Single Family from Commercial/Office 2 Commercial/Office from Commercial/Office 2.5 Multi -Family from Commercial/Office 3 City Center Area, Senior Housing 7/13/2021 24 CIT Federal Wa Transit Ridership Criteria Point Scale Existing Transit Ridership Data Riders per Weekday Bus Stops within 400' (either or both sides)* Other Bus Stops Within 1/3 mile 0 0 - 14 0 - 29 0.5 15 - 29 30 - 59 1 30 - 44 60 - 89 1.5 45 - 59 90 - 119 2 60 - 74 120 - 149 3 90+ 180+ 7/13/2021 * = Assumptions made for KC Metro Dart 901 & 903 Services. 25 CIT Federal Wa ■1 Cost Feasibility Criteria Point Scale Cost Feasibility Estimated Cost ($) 0 + 50001 0.5 50000 - 35001 1 35000 - 30001 1.5 30000 - 25001 2 25000 - 20001 2.5 20000 - 15001 3 15000 - 0 7/13/2021 26