Loading...
21-101125-UP-Traffic Report Appendix-09-14-2021-V3APPENDIX From: Soma Chattopadhyay [maikto: Sonia -Chattopadhyay acityoff'edera[way-comj Seat. Thursday, August 26, 021 1. Z PM To: 'Mark 3 Jacobs, PE, PTO' 5ulbjeck: RE: 2016.027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Comments - Initial Feedback Hi Mark, I am net aware the status of this project. But I thi6k two weeks w i I I not cause delay for the project - Thank you for your help. 5ama From: Mark J Jacobs, PE, PTO [rnailto.JakeTraffic@ comcast.net] Sent: Thursdays August 26, 2021 1 :56 PM To: Soma Chattopadhyay Subject: RE. 2016,027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Comments - Initial Feedback 1EXTERNAL EMAIL WARNING] This email originated from outside of the City of Federal Way and may not be trustworthy - Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to requests for information- if you have any doubts about the validity of this email please contact 17 Help busk at x2555. Sorna I afn overwhelmed with work at tale moment- if you really need me to change the submitted T I A to reflect potential minor tweaks in the TG I will try to squeeze it in next week or two. I hope that this would not cause a delay issue far the project? No change to traffic operations would result - Thank you Mark From: Soma Chattopadhyay [mailto.Sorrya.Chathopadhyay@cityoffecleralway.corn] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 11:59 AM To: 'Marie J Jacobs, PF, PTO' Subject: RE: 2016,027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Comments - Initial Feedback Hi Mark. We reed to be consMent so it is t-egtfired to update the TIA, Thank you for your help - Soma From: Mark J Jacobs, PE, PTO Erna ilto:lakeTraffic@comcast,net] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 11:55 AM To: Soma Chattopadhyay Subject: RE: 2016.027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Cormment5 - Initial Feedback IEXTEftNAL EMAIL WARNING1 This email oOginated from outside of the City of Federal Way and may riot be trustworthy - Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to requests for information- If you have any doubts about the validity of this email please contact IT Help Desk at x2555. Soma I have not revised the submitted repack and explained the reasoning as follows: The AM TG 142.8 versus 142-5 arrd PM 13 .6 versus 1 3. 7- fused conservative dada fora Comae ,Shop Use, the typical FF TG rate fs sfgnlficantly less fo the AM and aberit 5% less during the PM peak hoar. The Traffic c Data used in the report is reasonable, )+kely conservalive. The TIF value would be determined when the actual cornmerrial users are determined. Thank you Mark 206.76 -1978 o 206.799-569 c From: Soma Chattopadhyay trnai€to:Sorna.ChattepadhyayC cltyoffederalway-com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 11:32 AM To: `Mark J Jacobs, PE, PTO' Subject: RE: 2016,027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Comments - initial Feedback Mi Mark, I have those reports iri our file- But I like to have the updated Tex in TiF and analysis with the numbers - PM peak hour number is charmed. Thank you - Soma TABLE 2 • FW GENERATION mad Rd4 enwvd) S. 34TI'l-I STREEt NDn) USE - F L WY SITE ACCESS TRAFFIC INPAC-7ANnLYM TNMFero SU9 I T6Fri I eU06 TLFIOWS I UM It I EdtTrwps TOPTotal 111MMs31 EAW% Sharrsd Eftk*Trim Irdmuil i E*?k i CxdTry PM f4190 A pad neat (ITE UC sr? % 2404FMW w4 *04k+ 240 5.&4 60U5 6528 5016 6528 1305.6 AM Peak hwi 2A01 0.36 1 26xs 225 74N 63.9 86.d 5� 1 L11 30� 12.8 PM peak Mau 2401 0.44 61�5 618 391� 41.2 105.6 2C--1 12,E 46 1 82 5v,a :., a::• 2221, 0-44 4 ? 517 51t 53.9 10�6 � 1200�A 131oboa I7C� Pmpowct RataY OrE LUC aM 5.423 ;d1 *7B413 i 5.423 37 - 75 5 1024 lti 107- 4 2047ANT peaF rsow 5.423 0-94 62-: 3.2 38; 19 15.! 20?- 061 ?0 -� 1 0-4 PM Peak, trou 5.423 3.81 481- 9.9 521i 1Q. 7 207 2 201 20:� 21 S.toe.. Icon 4.5 5A 12.7 4$+! 11,7 24.4 13W to ZE #Fopaeert Shop With OrrreUpSarbwep7ELLX:937-1210DO1*" 4la .b3?-11Mit- Z100 1190 1249.5 503� 1249.5 2.499-0 - - - - AM peak {SEJxti 2.1C0 89 51% 953 491t 91.6 L86.9 15-It IA-31 Ttl LS PM peoh hour i ZIM 43-38 50% 45 � 509� 45.5 9L1 2C - 9.1 20'w 91 Saturday a 2.1w j37 7 503� 9? 2 50k 92 1 i842 <-1000to li(K Trial V*OkOaa - I - 2JU 5 - Z0D5 4PW•• - — AM pee F- I rah - 12E} 9 - 157-'W 2784 16 i - i5d0 FIVI pffik hotr _ _ _ 119-9 - 97 5 217.4 - 24-0 -- LQ5 SahordaV Peak Arm* 117A - Ilk 2356 - - - - More x - x a nuts U k. 0005a pwsrty Percem per ITE and 1TE TraMa Ergmr►wnq eve6mce - )TE has datia RE coffee ShW that rdicate5 t" gimtrer8t4a fewar sups Ulan I da;�a suggt?sLs. the hi&wr f 83ta IS IrOikCt 10ernurt�- a CO Saturday peak WeSV2rybyIan d use. see time periods irr table. the value noted is 75 at be to#al to reflect d4eren¢ peaking tirnk- Avehude trap rs defused as a single or one direct Lon vehide movement wrth eutdw the o€91n or destinaton �exging or errterangl inside the stvdyske The above trip generatron -alues accourd for all the site trips made by al vehicles for all nurpases. inc IWin g commuter. v isrtor- reCreatior► and service and deirwery veh,Cle trq From: Mark ] Jacobs, PE, PTO [rnailbo:lakeTrafbc n oarrcast.net] Sent Thur-,day, August 26, 2021 11:15 AM To: 5orna Chattopadhyay Cc: bchilds0gravesassoc.ovrn; bjacobs( n@fnw-inr-.com Subject RE. 2016.027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - Cky Traffic Comments - Initial Feedback [EXTERNAL EMAIL WARNING] This email originated from outside of the City of Federal Way and r�r y not be trust orthy. Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to requests for information. If you have any do�jbts about the validity of this errraiI please contact IT Help Desk at x2555- The report Appendix is attached From: Ma rk I Jacobs, PE, PTO imaiIto:JakeTraffiicacomcaA.net] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 11:13 AM TO: 'Soma Chattopadfiyay' Cc: 'bchilds gravesassac.com', 'bjacabser} l'nw-inc.com` Subject: FEE: 2016.0.27 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Comments - Initial Feedback Soma The requested report is attached. The Appendix wiII be submitted next - Thank you Marls 206.762.1978 o 206.799.5692 c Fv m: Soma Chattopadhyay [rnailto:Soma.Chattopadhyayr catyofFederahnray.corn] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 11:05 AM To: 'Mark J Jacobs, PE, PTO' Subject: RE. 2016,027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Comments - Initial Feedback Hi Mark, Could you please Send me the updated traffic irnp�ict analysis with the modified TG as a final docufnent? Thank you , Sams From: mark J Jacobs, PE, PTO Emailto:lakeTfaffrc amcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 4.52 PM To: Sorna Chattapadhyay Cc: bjacobsen fn-inc.com; bchildsagravesassoc.cor'n Subject: RE: 2016.027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Cornmients - Initial Feedback [EXTERNAL ENTAIL WARNING] This ernaiI originated from outside of the City of Federal Way and may not be trust orthy, Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or repying to requests for information. If you have any daubts about the validity of this email please contact iT Help Desk at x2555_ oma Good catch, it appears the submitted SEPA TG vaIues were inadvertently carried over from a prior iteration of the Site Planning, Ben will amend and Resubmit the S EPA to correct the TG values. Thank you Mark 206.762. 1 978 e 206.799. 92 c From: Mark J Jambs, PE, PTO Emailtc:JakeTraffir-@romcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 4:43 PM To: 'Ben Childs' Subject: RE: 2016.027 - Federal Way Mixed Use - City Traffic Cprnments - Initial Feedba& Ben Item f_ — it appears the TG noted is riot consistent with the vaities pfojected and studied in the TIA. The Site Plan had several iterations and the Ti u rin bers depicted may be from a prior iteration. 142.5 net new AM peak hour to the street grid and 128.7 during the PM peak hour per Table 2 of the TIA ]tern h_ — Pay applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee accounting for on -site shared trips (walking in lieu of driving) that are not new to the City street grid From: Mark J Jacobs, PE, PTC [mailto.JakeTrafFrrc >camcast-ne'tI Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 10:59 AM To: 'sarady.long@cityoFFeder8lway.com' Cc: 'Ben Childs', 'Brett Jacobsen' Subject: RE. 2016.027 - S. 348th Street Mixed - use sarady Thank you for taking the time today to discuss the 348"' Street Mixed Use Per our conversation I'll be updating the prior Access Report using the refined Site plan: - The City recommends that conservative Trip Generation values be used in the analysis to avoid futufe report refinements. 2018 traffic data is appropriate to use for the amass analysis The distribution noted prior is still applicable Detailed discussion of the 21 access (LT in, RT inlout) on _ 3481 'Street per prior correspondence Let me know if l have missed anything? Thank you Mark 206.762.1978 o 206.799.5692 c From: Mark J Jacobs, PE, PTO[mailto;JakeTrafnr-@comcast.net) Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 2:39 PM To: 'sarady.fongacityoffederaltray.com' Cc: 'Bern Childs'; 'Brett Jacobsen' Subject: 2016.027 - S. 348th Strut Mixed - use sarady Attached are the Traffic Letter I conducted in August 2019, a refined Site F1lan and a preliminary TO for the refined project_ The S B UX use is a placeholder use, the actual use has not yet been determined_ Also I hove zeroed out data frorn the prior site uses that no longer apply (blacked out). I'll clean the TG table up as I get into updating the report. The refined site plarnning generates less traffic than what was looked at prior_ The new Site Planning reduced the number of residential units and for nmeroia1 space from what was investigated in 2019_ Also the accesses have changed, In particular the refined site includes an access at the NE corner of theL site that. allows for a of access (LT in, RT iWout) to be proposed. Initial discussion regarding this proposal has been coordinated with the City and would be discussed rn detail in the Site Access TrafFic Report. I presume the same traffic distribution as used prior still applies_ The TMC data used prior is from 2018, does the City have newer data? If yes please e-mail it to me_ Contact me with any questiortsicomments. Thank you Mark 206.762.9 78 0 206.799.5692 c From: Yla�k I Jacobs, PE, PTO fmailto:]akeTrafc comcat.net] Sent: Tuesday, Septiember 15, 2020 11:02 AM To: 'Sarady Long' Cc: 'bjaoobsen fnvv-inc.com' Subject: RE. 2016.027 - S. 348th Mixed Llse Sarady Below is a Conceptual Access Sketch for discussion_ The plan would remove -25` of ' ' curb, extend the extension striping about 100' and use double yellow markings to discourage LT motorists from entering the LT ehannelizatian to quickly. A ITT di annelization tsland would be installed at the driveway_ Thank you Mark Fro rn. Clark J Jacobs, PE, PTO [mai Ito, )a keTraficCq)coracast.net] Sent: Friday, September 04, 202 0 12-33 PM To: ' Grady Long' Subject: FEE. 2016.027 - S. 348th Mixed Use arady The driveway across the street and about 120 ko 125' to the east CL to CL serves 10.760 sf of office space per King County data, TG per ITE Enier Eater EM Trp Time Period Sze TG Rabe % fries Exit % Tree Taiail ExisUM Office (11TE WC 71€0� IG,760 sD Weekday 10,76GI 974 1 50% 1 5 _4 59:* 1 52.4 104.8 AM peak hOUF 1G,7601 1.16 1 85k 1 10_ 14% 1 JL71 12.5 PM peak hour IG,7601 115 1 16% 1 2.0 84% 10_4 12_4 From my Site Access TIA dated August 8, 2019 having the east access allow the WS to SB LT would shift 40 LT's from tuming at 1 u and then from 1 into the site (— LT movements) to the Site Access_ I assigned all tha traffic from the office to the fury as t_T's Attached are the initial Synchro calculations (using data from my August 2019 TIA), i focused on the PM peak hour that is the critical time_ Initial analysis indicates the proposed east bite Access is faf enough away from 1 � to facilitate the VV5 to SS LT. See Google Stfeet view looking west below neaf the site east access: The driveway to the east is noted to be low volume and is not expected to cause conflict See trhotograph below {the east Site Access is near the end of the 'C' curb: Have a good weekend. chat next week_ Mark 06.76 .1978 o 06.799_569 c From: Sarady Long[maRD,Sarady_Long C)oityoffederalway.comI Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2026 2:37 PM To: 'Mark ] ]a[obs, PE, PTO' Subject: RE. 201 _027 - S_ 348th Mixed Use Hi Mark, Rick is out this week so l will discuss with hire late next week_ It may work but we need to look a[ WBL gtie ue5 length and potential confIict with the driveway across the street_ arady Kong Senior Tiransportation Planning Engineef �..__. a Nublic Works Ueparimenl 33325 8#1 Ave S. Federal way, wA 98M3 Desk' 25;3.835_2743 I Fax:253.835.27Ei9 V"M-dty0fte deraiway.com From: Mark J Iacobs, PE, PTO [mailtoJakeTraffic@ aorncast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 9,16 AM To: Sarady Long Cc: bj8cobsen@bfnw-Inc.com Subject: 2016.027 - S, 348th Mixed Use [EX7ERN AL EMAIL WA This email originated from outside of the City of Federal Way and may no be trustworthy- Please use caution when clicking links, opening attachments, or replying to requests for information_ If you havo any doubts about the validity of this email please contact IT Help Desk at x2555. arady dope you are recovering well_ Have you had a chance to Iook at the 011annelizationlAc ess for the project yet? Thank you Mark 206.762.1978 o 2D6.799, 692 c TT1?A FFIC DATA GA TWRHVG TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 6.00 AM - 8.00 ANI PEAK HOUR- 7,00 AM TO 8=00 AM Pegs-2 4 9 C4 71 Turn 7,133 ,�, �icydcs 0 INTERSECTION PI=AK HOUR VOLUME IN 2,716 OUT 2.716 co �i 2973 F5111 4 156 1 83 90 443 100 ' 49 372 2d9 [o 0 0 335 S%7 V ;r Peds = 4 S 348th Shfet 145 BKydes 399 620 r 76 U-Turn n i 1 i HV f HF 11B 3-�-]% 0.85 we 6.60!A 0.91 1.3% U_93 9EB IIriTRS- 1 3.8% 0.93 PHE = PeaR Hour facbr I IV - Heavy Vehicle IstAve ntie S @ 3 348th 45treet(SW Campus Drive Federal Way, WA COUNTED BY- TDG DATE OF COUNT: Wed 6I U18 REDUCTION DATE: Fri. 6129118 TIME OF DAUNT_ 6=00 AM - 8-DO AM u MIIIIMIIIIII MU000IeeIIII����o� �1 IIIIe1IWJ1111E� �EIOCC�11oC11��� � I :1�lOC!l1LEE�EE .3 °mills i11111e �lLEEEEEli1�1EC��i I EEREEEmEONEOCCECi IMICEN HIRE ECEIEIEIEQI@m,OHIN QEEQ E�,��E�e6l6 eEel u„ueut IeIIeiiI���iiieeoi��� SvCo TTRAFFIC ,DATA GATHERIN TURNING MOVEMENT'S DIAGRAM 4:00 PM - 6-00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4-34 PM TO 5=30 PM I (o Q 123 .612 4 104 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 3,808 OUT 3,809 PZI 67 186 65 to � 0 Q r= � 4,'l21 3i8 q � M m Peds = 4 - 131 0 Rid.yr�PS '108fi 1,64 T r3 430 U-Turn u HV PHF SB 1.4% 0-85 No 3-1% 0.89 WB 1_2°fo 0-04 EB 2.3% 0.95 INTRS- 1-6.4 0.95 PHF = Peak Hour Factor HV = Heavy Vehicle Ist Avenue S g S 348th Street] W Campus Drdve Federal Way, WA COUNYEU BY: TQG DA (E OF COUNT: Tue_ 6f5118 REDUCTION DATI=- 16. 6I29118 TIME OF COUNT 4:00 PM - 8:04 PM o � t� 16 1111111111111111.1 4. J ('.J 0.0- /� ! 11 rpulea .lake Traffic Enginceri ng, Inc. Traffic Corms Consullamts, Inc. F1smr:(255)w2t-ouL74 FAX-- 'i i)9*Y-72LL F—Mul lbung CNnL[Ixn WHF1Hir.: lutnseDlwn: Esa A,+ NA: 4143&ilftiW l'iogma LJl dale of COumt; 1''r:s 1.'4?1 I.DCASMF: Tarkrzl War, *'hhIIJ;IIIn rhI`CNW 9Y Jc TilaI ROM riOAh 417 Oki) FFCM So4iL1 on �Mki From EaM Un (OW Frain Wcl an �EHJ kKmval Erfl v:a I sx h I IA Mr J 4 342dI S) W l"�ii� Ilk Total T I I. S F T 1. S 9 '1 1. 5 K '1 L. ti k 71%A a 19 52 9 7 19 So SS 0 10 11131 !L n II. 1% 11 7U*_ 7 Lu ,{ ri 1R 'I li ?I III a la 7R li If 2D LLL Ult llindhigm M A u !1 17 i 1 IH 61 64 4 34 IHI s.l 1 1.1 323 13 711 6 ORA 1: 47 l'F la 1 4 j1} SII I 1; 120 15 2qq 11 7i7 0:I5A d "_A H IL 1 4 11 iL J JO Lao 44 1. 25 24i IU 03 A 10.1 2 41 1{ r 1 0 11 25 'fk 'k 14:1 4I S 41 101 11 'Jf.l $:44h J 41t L7 I l T 33 1+1 A L6 143 3? O 49 M- IS 405 0 go I {x I1 4n .1 11 2*' K I2 151 #'- 1 iL 15'7 24 xI7 41SA u u II u 9 iI D II 0 0 cl 0 U O 4 0 0 0 M A H II H 11 it U IE u Is I'. {I II II fl {I 41 {I 9:ssA 0 0 0 n 4 U 0 II 0 ri 0 D R 0 {I 11 {I M IHI A II II u u u u U II {Y fi II I! G 6 n II u 'Iwa I Su_m 1- ',.q Ins 1+-; 1, :LI 'i?7 tai ax IfH1 Iim i:,m 1 244 .Ku 110 S'I'_i P{ik Hiw. H'00 AM m 9W hhS 13 L.?2 GL CIA 4 --S Ilry 114 21 47 i'N 201 17 Il'1 Ii7'1 6'_ JUU4 117 261 ]In LOW ID21? dHV-' m 1 x 2*% 11% I m EL79 0.IN GM OL92 041 � 15t A4+t S M20 1:}7 gi ti\%' {'211p1 F 4r Lit 61 171 T'is} -14M tit �!I PM ST! x� Aikr 4J �r Yjl# IF lTu.- IRM 13Tu &W ANI Iµ %N ALM }' I YNd rf.w I Ela N 4 E hma• 14' Ekd 3 AI 11u 114 S?I N J e? JIM- tail Hk I!QT u1 1 _ 1 _ IJL41—��.} FHF :.NW IN- u' 11 RE O 7' L C.. 1hr az i .- 141 {7�fl we 0q5 :5°. INTV I I.- 10P.r? NR 11 HU I lP.. INT 06 1 L L J Oul; )Wq 518 IE TJ 1r6 q{r. I I Ixl Ave i T1. u.9] I r, a I n. - _ 4 E31cyrlcs Fnr.I: N S F VM l'ux�IlWb: Hr:N I [ INIu1 lL NI m INTO LI HT INTn 1 L NI I1 h INT 04 1 L N I I'. {I IN'r QG 0 1T Nl ex [I ' r WlJ.na MT gr 0 N f m FI HT VJ 0 .II i WLT 11 II mr 1 U 1cl 13 ,fTF764dUf.1 6ia r 17rRuedfn .fake Traffic Engineering, Inc. Truk Couni Consullanos, Inc. LLZ thane (:53)'Y2f}fJi0l} I-:x.Y t=}al y==-'.II r-hr:..l 7nlw.ijiS Mnc clan WBFA}kr nle vC11ON: ISL A+ S fi S WRIh SIf. W { bnpuz 1}r D to of Cm t: 'k.I .Owlon: F'cJt-.;'1 W.Y. Cft ked Ryr less �®®mod®�®�■�®tee©�m� ®ems®��®��■�ae��ea� 1 I 'Xa 1 _'07 M I .oL 1 7 1142 =S''! IV 7 �+r'. r-x.z ti'};, R 3.11 *2o1 1S. 6A15 P�nklkw 12.45PM I.. LASYM Cc4xl I 1 131 1 144 IM I CA 1 PS{ 1 RI: i F111 070 1" _ J1Y 1_II, r.l u,- %rry usx aYA pm; ; 9.03 a 11.9G1 0 SJ I} VI. 7311 j[[�� 1 ti1i' 1'ae[ lut IFr i- 144 1 L31TSpJ 434Hlh tii i Y.l II} a like 13'F2' IYY6 IM45 ",M Iµ L_+IS FM I �Yod 743i I"E6. M N E. V I'ed r,a ISI I J* 14'_4 T_R f'f1i-1'[a4llr+vw riJ'rm. INT 01 I Is.kt' vim -aLV aaT _ I FR .101 411'' RI 01 I 4YIT oWS 02% _ hR 04 2 1 I W: s_'I[. !Ylt [191 it IF. IYll n! _ _ a,2s iY..r- i7'hs tilt 410S UI.. kl' tl Ix[Xve4 '1'1mL CI.,I4 6" IN I 1 _ I i B;cv,4d F4'd N 5 L W 1i....11mm, INS {I IN01 0 INI OG {I HT 02 ;I MT 1L U W ITI'r 11 It ur 04 R IMTI a WF OS L! 16 Mr OG I I ti xuS hairs 7 IN7 10,10 U INT M I} INI 00 wfi O NT i i O JUT 17 [ 7] PNM't,l f1,I City of Federal Way T'ruff c Count Consullam , Inc. LLdi IMn— �2iiF'r'�^'+X'4 FnX'{:S}}W'-TFI k:-hb11 7'--Y3x:2ultcan WHFAMI, INersetiial: Is[ Rrr L` SaBLk 4 �' { a111p!'o- 17' DaM of Counk- Lar-AtlaH- Fed—1 Ti'— IN-F.. I... Crocked DY: Tuts 5CAr.,DI I r— MEMO �®®������®®pie®®�� �®�®ems ®®■�aa � ���� �■� Tali a 1�}7 af,l. 142 - 74 I-I.i 74 Tilil Y'_4'1 Il' W [;9t 7e,n In Apjl, u.li IM '.I' 1'75Q IUUa%Iry 2-s iCIAu.n 1'NF' 0.61 [;'.IH "4 0.95 1,1 Avr 4 141 A [— �I! ,S%v CAn pd Dr J+12 �1M1h f�7 - -R -- Pad Id[F PeJ '1 Btei�I+mm FED, IW' fli IN I L" I INTOa 11,11{ INT 3 4 INI T I 4iT P hT M 2 MT 4 NT WJf .1 K W � fl :FLlr. m Scall PDT m cOMPM y I pcl IWY. Ilea I r� la1 T] 4.Y�I# A 171F'A k h4— 1'.d,vwrr 2 FB i1'If. 1) V. 11 955 F fhak WD IL.7+1 n r, 11 Fw: 40�7 WE 1Y'M L CON 4 1245 lies! -1447 Fi 431 1`14% 3 1 st Ave S T Inc 1 N {7 s?. n Skeyc"F[ : N 5 E w talnioez 9 I.Jt w L7 IFi! Q INl t 4} f7 INI4+1 0 Q 1NT f7 16 LNT{5 0 mi of !ITal 1 LI 4 NT Do {' MT 1 i1 .1 I1 P F.T U 1 11 11 I H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2018 AM 484& 1 Av S & SVV Campus Dr/S 348 St 1 tf2812020 --► } 1 1 I t EST WR WBL V,IHT W8R NBL. NET. HER �BL SET Lane Configurations - - t �i'i ++ ? _ +T* ++ r Traffic Vol urne(veht) 90 943 100 76 399 145 49 372 24R 83 159 51 Futire'Volurne (veWh) 90 943 10G 76 399 145 49 372 249 83 159 51 Initial 0 (Qb), veh G 0 0 0 0 0 G D 0 0 0 0 Pud-Bike Adj(A-cbT) 1.00 0. 1.00 0-99 1.00 0_99 1.00 0.9' Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.04 0,99 1.00 1.0G 0.99 1.00 1.00 0,99 1-00 1.00 0.99 Work Zone On .Appfoactr Nc; No No No Adj W Plow, vehWn 1761 1761 1761 19G9 1909 1909 1567 1567 1567 1988 1985 1988 Ada Flom' Rote, YQWh 95 993 105 81 424 154 55 418 280 98 187 60 Peak Houf FaMr 0.95 0,95 0_95 0.94 0,5,4 0.94 0.89. 0-8 0.89 0.85 0. &5 G.85 Percent Heaq Veh. % 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehfh 136 1307 138 434 1855 918 31;8 430 285 121 392 238 ArfiveOr.3'reen C,.04 0.43 0.42 0.0: 0.17 0.17 0.21 0.25 025 O.00 0.1[] 0.10 atFia ,vehfh 3254 3039 321 3528 3628 159B 1492 1698 1126 1893 3777 1623 Grp -�eh;h 05 547 5r.1 81 424 154 55 366 332 98 187 60 Grp Sat Flows).vebUrL 1627 1673 1687 1764 1814 1596 1492 1489 1335 1893 1889 1623 � Se v�1,9_s), s 4.3 41.5 4'.6 3.3 15 2 10.8 4.5 36-5 3"r.1 %,? r Cycle Q C4ear(m), s 4.3 41.5 41.6 33 15.2 Ma 4,5 36.5 37.1 7.7 7-0 3.1 Pro;,'n Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap;cj, vehM 136 719 725 434 1855 918 318 377 33 121 392 238 +�r'C Ratin() --.70 0.76 0.76 0.'.9 0.23 D.17 0.17 O.- 7 j'J-98 0.81 0.48 0.25 Avail Cap(c-a), veh,'h 228 719 725 434 1855 918 31$ 377- 33 177 102 513 HCt-,' Platoon R.4o 1.00 1.00 t {W .0.33 G.33 0.33 1.00 1,00 t Q() 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fittegl) 0-94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1_00 0.84 0.84 0,84 Uniform De, y (d), slvoh 70.9 36.2 36.3 64.7 38.8 27.0 48.2 55.4 56,1 69.3 63.4 27.8 Incr Belay (d2), slveh 23 7-0 6.9 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 38-2 43.7 8.9 0.3 0.2 Ir,itiai -D Delay?d3j,sr,ro7 C..0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 C. 0.0 %ile 6ackCrfQ(95%),veMn 3.3 24.9 25-1 2.7 12.0 8.2 3:1- 24.5 3-2 7.0 6.1 2.5 Unsig. Pelo%-smeot. Delay, Slveh LnGrp Delay(d),stveb 73.2 43.2 43-2 64.S 37.1 273 48.3 93.7 99-7 78.2 63_7 28.0 LnC: LOS F D C E D C J If F E F. u Approach Vol, wee-1'h 1193 658 753 345 ApproaU`i Dezay s veh 45.6 M.2 93.0 61.6 Approa0 LOS 1) D F E r .. .. C 4 6 .71 8'. Phs Duration (+Y+Rc), s 14.60 43.G n.4 69.0 37.0 20.6 IG-8 811 Cr•an je Period {Y+RC', s 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green SeMng (Grnax), s 14.0 38.0 14.0 64.5 11-0 41-.G 10.5 68.0 Max Q C.earTirnn kg c+�1). s 9.7 39.1 `.i.3 4.6 6.5 9.0 6.3 17 Z Green Ext Time (D-:O, s 0.0 G.D 0.1 9.1 0.0 1.6 0,1 4.1 H M 6th Clut Delay 57.9 HChA 6th L.US E 2018 TMC 5:00 pm OIM2018 2024 AM - WP Synchro 10 Light Report PW - SL Page 1 Queues 2018 AM 4 40: 1 Av& SW Campus Dr/S 348 St V28?20 0 Lane Croup Flom (vph) 95 1098 81 424 154 55 698 98 187 60 vio Rapo 0.51 0.69 0-25 0.23 0.16 0-18 0.89 0.71 0-39 0.16 Contrul Delay 78-6 32.4 44.7 8-5 1.6 54.4 62-3 95.7 64.E 10-9 Queue Velay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 U 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0-0 'dial relay 78.6 :?2-4 44.7 8.5 1.6 54.4 62.3 95.? 6.1.2 10.8 Queue Length 50th (fk} 48 411 39 76 16 39 315 96 94 2 Queue Length 93t� it, 80 465 m58 65 6 M88 384 140 101 30 IritemAUilkDist (fl) 745 554 345 1107 Twn Bay Lengt7 (f) 1 75 22� 250 150 4GD 225 Base Capacity (vph) 232 1st 320 1806 973 321 870. 166 977 390 tarvatic,'i; p eciurtn 0 0 C? 0 0 0 0 0 L + pi€Dock 1rap Redu-,tu 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 toraga Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R uced vk Rabo 0-41 0.69 0.25 D-23 0.16 0.17 0-90 0.59 0.19 0-15 DeWpOn; Traffic Cauut Consultant-10l22MI4 m Volume for 95tf= is metered by u;,strearn signal 2018 TV C 5:00 pm 01 002018 2024 AM - bWP SynOro 10 Light Report Ptifq - SL Pie 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2624 AM - WO X 4340' 1 Av VV Campus Dr/S 343 St 11 8f20 0 E�bR VUIJL Ali NBL- NBT NCR $Bl. S8 t3R Lace Configurations M t'tr 11) tt Traffic Volume (veh1h) 100 1064 119 85 450 165 55 420 2&0 95 180 55 uture Vo'ume fvv'hln) 100 1 G64 119 85 450 165 55 420 280 95 18G 55 Initial 0 (W. Veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped•Bike AdjrM-pb,r,, `.00 0,99 ".w'0 G.99 100 0.99 1.00 C.97 Panciq Bias, Adj 1.00 1-00 0.99 1.00 1-00 0.99 1.00 1-0 0.99 1,00 ID) 0.99 Work Zor.•e On Approach No No rb No Adj Sat Flaw, vehlhiln 1T61 1761 1761 1909 1909 1909 1567 1567 1567 1 B8 t988 1988 A.di Fiv-v Ra'e, vehr7 10' 1120 '25 90 479 176 62 472 315 1 ,2 212 65 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0-q5 0-94 G.94 0,94 0.89 0.89 0-89 0.85 0.85 0-85 :-UrE4:r„ Hi:avy Velt. °ro 3 3 3 2 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap. vehih 146 1299 146 407 1815 913 322 430 2&6 135 411 252 ,',rrive -On G-cen O.05 0.43 0.42 0.04 0 17 0.1., 0- 2 0.25 0.25 0-07 & 11 0.11 Sat Flow. vehM 3254 3020 337 3528 3628 1595 1492 1897 1127 1893 3TU 1625 Gyp V0luine(v,l, 'jeh,'h 105 620 525 90 479 176 62 41L 373 112 212 65 Grp Sat Flaw(s),veltlhAn 4627 1673 1R4 1764 1814 1595 1492 1489 1335 1993 1889 1625 0 Scnrc;g 5". s 4.8 50.3 505 3.7 17,3 12? 5.1 38.0 38.0 8.8 7.9 3.3 Cydt 0 Clear(g_o), s 4,8 50,3 5D.6 V 17.3 12-3 5.1 38.0 38-0 8-8 7.9 13 P,-cp In La-ic 1.00 0-20 1.00 1.00 1.00 p.84 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Gap{cj, veh1h 146 719 724 407 1815 913 322 377 338 135 411 252 VIC Ratie(X) 0.72 0',86 0.86 0.22 0.26 0 19 0. `9 1.10 11.10 0.83 0.52 0-2 Avail Gap(c-a). veht 228 719 724 407 1815 913 322. 377 338 177 1032 .519 HX"'M1 platoon Ratio 1 00 1.00 1.00 0A3 0.33 033 1-00 1.00. ; 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 Ups"am Fitter(l) 0-944 0-94 0.&4 1,00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1-00 0-84 0.84 0,84 Uniform Delay Id.), siveh 70.7 38 ? 38.9 65.6 38-5 27.4 48.1 56-0 56.4 68.7 631 27.1 Inca Nay (d2). siveh 2.3 12-2 12.3 0.1 0,4 0.5 0.1 75.2 79.6 14.8 0-3 0.2 Iritia; Q Delay�A,s.-vO 0.0 00 {).0 C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 C. 0.0 % le Back0F (95%),vehAn 3.7 30.3 30-7 3.1 133 9.2 3.5 31-4 291 8, 1 6-8 2.7 Ur}sic, Mov,�meat Delay, slam LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 73.0 50.9 :-2 65-7 38.9 27-9 48.2 131,2 136.0 83.6 63.4 27.3 LnG---p LOS E D D E D G 0 P F E 0 Approach Vai. veWh 1350 745 849 389 Approach Delay, alveh 52.8 39.5 127.3 (33.2 Approach LOS D D E Phs Dufafion ( +Y+R,.), s 15.7 43,0 22.3 69.0 37A 21.3 1'.3 84-0 Chanc,r ri(,i ;Y+' ' s 5.0 5-0 5.0 4.5 5-G 5.0 45 5 C Max Green Setting {Gmax), s 14,0 38.0 14.0 64.5 110 41.0 10-5 68-0 Max 0 G! ear Tirrre 19 ; +I' , . s `C.8 -0.0 7 u2.5 7 1 9.9 6.8 19.3 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.3 0.0 1.8 0.1 4.7 � WsecQ6mrra ry- - KIM 64h W 138lay 70-0 KM 6th L08 E 2018 TIVIC 5:00 pan 0 110018 2024 AM - VVP Synchro 10 Light Ri�port PVd - SL Page 1 Queues 2024 AM - VVO - LT 4 40: 1 Av S & SW Campus Dr/S 348 St 1112&2020 :Cai�DU BBL EB`t vy$- WBT 'NER NEL NBT - �_- Lar:e Group �Iow (-vph) 10{ '245 MCA 47� 176 fit 787 112 212 65 Wo Ratio 0.64 0.62 0.28 0.28 0.19 0.19 0.93 0.76 0,40 0.17 Con:1rot Dalay 80.1 4-0.3 47.0 10.9 25 52.9 66.0 98.8 62.9 1'.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0,9 0.0 G.O. 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total De -ay 80.1 40_3 47.0 10.9 25 52.0 66.0 98.9 62.9 41.3 Cwque Length 50th (111) 53 583 43 92 28 42 3$9 108 107 3 Queue Lergtn 95th (ti) 86 53B -7;66 87 8 m97 #483 #153 112 33 Internal Link Gist (tt) 745 554 345 1107 Turn Bay _ength (`) 175 225 250 150 400 225 Base Capacity svphti 232 1513 320 1713 925 338 869 166 10G4 410 51.ar rain Cap Red--Jcb 0 12 0 0 0 9 0 Q 0 .. Spillbaok Cap Reduotr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tvak,u Ci�p -Rer1t,c=n 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Reduced v;c Ratio 0.45 0,83 0.28 0.28 0.19 0.18 0.91 0,67 0.21 0.16 Description; TraM, Count CormultainI-10 212014 V 95th percentile Yoaurr-e exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. QL}etle shown is maxirrurr n#ter bvo cycles, m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstr22m signal, 2018 TMC 5:00 pm 01102018 2024 AM - WP Syndro 10 Ught Report PA' - SL Page 1 HCM 6#h Signalized Intersection Sum mary 2024 AM - 1 P - LT 4840: 1 Av S & SW Campus Dr/S 348t 08f30J2C � __w '1(- 4--- t 11 t Movemenf EJ§L EBT EBR WBL 1dg5T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Cornftguratiorts )1) ti * )IF, ++ F Vi +'T* ft r Traffic Volume (vehJti) 100 1062 118 85 437 163 71 449 279 104 188 55 Future Volume (vehlh) 100 1062 118 85 437 163 71 "9 279 104 i83 55 Irtifial Q (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pad -Bike Adj(A-.pbT) 1-00 0.99 1-04 0-99 1-00 0.99 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 4-00 1.00 0-99 1-00 1.00 9-99 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vehihiln 1761 1761 1761 1909 1909 1909 1567 1567 1567 1988 1988 1983 Adj Flour Rate, vehJh 105 1118 124 90 465 173 80 504 313 122 221 65 Peak Hour Facbr 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.94 0.�4 0.94 0.89 0,89 0-89 0.85 0-85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehih 146 1300 144 388 1795 913 327 443 274 145 418 255 Arriue On Green 0.05 0-43 0.42 0.04 016 0.16 022 0.25 0,25 0-08 0.11 0 11 Sat Flow,vehJh 3254 3023 335 3528 3628 1595 1492 1749 1083 1893 3777 1626 Grp Volume(v), veWh 105 618 624 90 465 173 80 429 388 122 221 65 Grp Sat Flows),vehJ3•tllrt 1627 1673 1664 1764 1814 1595 1492 1489 13" 1893 1889 1626 Q Sen,re(g_s), s 4.8 50.1 50.3 3.7 16.8 12.0 6.6 38.0 38.0 9-55 8.3 33 cycle 0 Cbeog_c), s 4.8 50-1 50.3 3.7 16-8 12.0 6-6 36A 38.0 9-5 8.3 3-3 Psap In Lane 1,00 0.20 1.00 1.00 1-00 0-81 1 GO 1-00 Larte Grp cap(c). veht 146 719 724 388 1795 913 327 37 145 418 265 VJc Ratio(X) 0.72 0.86 0-86 0.23 o-26 0,10 0.24 � 1.14 0.84 0.53 0.25 Avail C3p(c_a), vehrh 228 719 724 388 1795 913 327 3 177 1032 520 HGM Platoon Rafio 1.00 1.D0 1-00 O.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upsfrearn Filfer(I} 0-84 0.94 0.94 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.00 0.84 0-84 0.84 Uniform Delay (d), sJveh 70.7 38-6 38.8 66.1 38-7 27.0 48.3 56.0 56.4 68-3 63.0 26-8 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 2.3 12A 12.2 0.1 0A 0-5 0A 89-0 92.6 18-7 0.3 0.2 Inikial 0 Delay(d3j:sNeh O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.O O.0 0.0 Wke Bac C4Q(95%),vehfln 3-7 30.2 305 8.1 13.0 9-0 4.5 33-8 31 A 8.8 7-0 2.6 Unsig- Movement Delay, s+veh Ln rp Delay(d),sfveh 710 60.7 51.0 66-2 39.1 27,5 48A 145.0 149-0 97.0 633 26.9 LnGrp LOS E D D E D c 1) F F F E C Approach ViDI, veh4i 1347 728 891 408 Approach Delay, suet 52.6 39-7 1381 64.6 Approach LOS D D F E Tlmef - Assigned F'fis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (C+Y+Rc), s 16-5 43,0 21,6 69-0 37.9 21-6 11.3 79. Change Period (Y+Rc): s 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.6 5-0 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14.0 38-0 14.0 84,8 11-0 41.0 10-5 68.0 Max Q Clear Time (g-c+l 1), s 11.5 40-0 5.7 52.3 8.6 10.3 68 18.8 Green Ext Time ( . s 0.0 0,0 0-1 7.4 0-0 1.9 q.1 4,5 ]ntersection urnma HCM 6th Cbri Delay 78.9 HCM 6th Lp5 E 018 TMC 5:00 pm 01102M18 2024 AM - VVP Synchm 10 Light Pepaf; P4V - SL Page 1 Queues 2024 AM - WP - LT 4340- 1 Av S & SW Campus Dr/S 348 St 0W0+ 021 I Lane GmLip E8L tBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NET SBL. SBT SBR Lane Group Flovw (Yph) 105 1242 90 465 173 80 817 122 221 65 vIc Ratio 0.54 0.84 0,28 0.28 0.19 0.20 0.96 0.80 0,61 0,20 Gontrol Delay 80.0 41.6 46-5 10.8 2.6 51.3 71.5 102.5 70,9 11.7 Queue Delay 0'0 0.1 O_0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 Total Delay 80.0 41.6 46.5 10.8 2.6 51.3 71.5 102-5 70.9 11.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 53 586 43 88 29 55 3B5 118 112 3 Clueue Length Wh (ft) 87 537 m64 82 8 119 #506 #190 116 33 IrrtemalLink Dist (ft) 745 554 345 1107 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 225 250 150 400 225 Base Capacity (vph) 232 1487 320 1686 912 394 860 M 977 341 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reduch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced We RaW 0,45 0.84 0.28 0,28 0.19 0.20 0.95 0.73 0.23 0.19 Intersection Summary Desc6pbun; Traffio Count Consultant-10122MI4 # 95th percentile volume esrceeds capacity, g4ieue may he longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles, m Volume Io-r 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 2018 TMC 5:00 pm 01102;2018 2024 AM - WP Syuchro 10 Light Report PVW - SL Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 A - VVP - LT - Optimized 4840: 1 Av S & SVV Campus Dr1S 348 St {112W020 T r' E13R WBL YYRT UVBR - NgT NER -SBL 95T Lane Configurations )VI +T+ �11 +t rrt t tt r Tra G Volume (veblh) 100 1062 118 85 437 163 71 450 277 103 188 55 Future Volume (aehrh) 100 1062 118 85 437 163 71 450 277 103 188 55 Init al Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?ed-Biko Ad€(A_pbTl 1-00 0.99 1 A0 090 1.00 ().99 1-00 027 Parking Bus, Adj t.00 1.00 0.99 U0 1,00 0.99 1,Ua 1.00 0.99 1,00 1.00 0-99 Wcrk Zcne On approach No No NO No Adj Sat Flow, veWhIln 1761 1761 1761 1909 1909 1909 1567 1567 1567 1988 1988 1988 Adj Flow late, vehih 105 1118 124 90 465 173 60 506 311 121 221 65 Peak Hoar Factor 0.95 4,95 0,05 0.94 0.94 0.94 0,89- 0.89 0-69 0-35 0.85 0.85 Per4er' Heavy Veh. % 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 C3p- veWh 146 1329 146 296 1725 881 356 480 294 144 418 255 ,arrive On Green O G5 0.44 0.43 0-03 0.16 0.16 024 +0.27 0.27 0.08 +0.11 0.11 Sat Flcw, veh1h 3254 M23 335 3U8 3628 1595 1492 1758 1077 1893 3777 1626 Gip ':+0jn,.e(v), veh;h 105 61$ 624 90 455 173 80 429 389 121 2 1 65 Grp Sat Flow(5),vebIhAn 1627 1673 1564 4764 1814 1595 1492 1499 1345 1893 1889 1626 Q Serve(g_s;I, s 4 8 49.5 49 7 3.8 16.9 12-2 6.5 41.0 4:-C 9.5 8.3 3-2 yde0 learfc,c),s 4-8 49.5 49.7 3.8 16.9 12-2 6-5. 41.0 41,0 9-5 8.3 3.2 Prop 1-1Lanc 1.00 0 20 1.04 1 00 1.00 0-V 1.00 1 00 Lane Gm Cap(c), wehlh 146 731 735 296 1726 881 356 407 368 144 418 255 WC Ratia(X) 072 0.85 0.85 0-30 0.27 0.20 0-22 1.05 1 06 D-84 0.53 025 Avail Caq(c_a)_ vehlh 228 731 735 296 1725 881 356 407 368 177 1032 520 HUI Platoon R2tio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0-33 0.33 0.33 1-00 1.00 1.00 t.CO 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter{I) 0.94 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.84 Uniform Delay (d). !.Neh 70.7 37.7 37.9 68.6 40.3 28-6 45.9 54.5 5A 9 6� A 63.0 26.0 tncr Delay (d2). 5Neh 2-3 11.0 11-1 0-2 0.4 0.6 0.1 59.2 62,5 18.3 0.3 0.2 initial 0 Delay(0)_slveh 00 0.0 0-0 0-0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 O.V 0-0 G,0 0-0 to Backolg95%).aehlln 3-7 29.7 30.0 3-1 13.1 9.1 4-4 30.5 28.5 8-6 7.0 2.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, slvch L. Grp Dday(d),slveh 73.0 48-7 49.0 68-9 40-7 29.1 46-0 113-7 117.4 B6-7 0.3 26.2 UiGrp LOS 7 C. E D C D F F E C Approach Vol, vehlb 1347 728 897 407 Approach Delay, srvcsr 50.7 41.4 109-3 a4 ? Approach LOS D D F B Plus Duraiftn (G}Y+RC), s 16-4 46.0 17.6 70-0 40.8 21.E 11-3 76.3 Change Period (Y-Rc), s 5 G 5.0 5.0 4-5 5.0 5.0 4.: r.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 14-0 41-0 10.0 65.5 14-0 41.0 10-5 65.0 lax QClear -imP. fg_C+11j, s 1'.5 430 �.8 5'.7 8.5 10.3 6.8 189 Greert Ext Time (p_ a), s 0,0 D-0 0.1 8.1 0-0 1.9 0.1 4-5 HGM 6th Ctrl Delay 65-9 HCM 61h LOS E 2018 TMr, 5.00 prr. 01�0212018 2024 AM - 4VP Synchm 10 Lighl Re�Ort PW - CL Page 1 Queues 20 4 AM - VVP - LT -optimized 4840: 1 Av S & SVV Cam us Dr/S 348 St Lane Group Flow , vpl3 } 105 1242 90 465 173 80 817 121 221 �5 WO RaW 0.54 0.81 0.39 0.28 0.20 0.19 0.92: U.80 0.61 0.20 Control May 79.9 38.9 50.4 10.9 2.6 49.3 640 1031 72.8 1? 1 Queue Delay 0.0 0_1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total De'.av 7� .9 39.0 50.4 10.9 26 49-1 64.0 103.1 72.8 12.1 Queue Langth 50th (fl) 53 680 44 89 28 54 378 117 110 1 QuweL rgfn95th'ft) 87 532 m66 83 8 117 #474 MO 123 33 internal Link Dist (ft) 745 554 345 1107 Turn Boy -tnoll~ kit} 175 225 250 150 400 22:5 use Capacity (vph) 232 1537 229 1S4-5 8W 413 921 166 977 341 ta-vason Cep Red:.ictn 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S;crage Cap R d-:ictn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 Reduced A Ratio 0.45 192 0.39 0.28 019 0.19 0.89 0.73 0.23 0.19 lriteaww rx�1i Desc6ptioTi; a raffle Coum Consultant - 101221-2014 9 95th PermOile ackime ex -weeds capac;ty: queue may be longer_ Queuo shown is maximum after twa cycles. in Volume for 95th percentile queue iE3 metered by upstream signal. 0181•MC 5:00 pm 01M201 B 2024 AM - 4VP Syrichro 10 Light Report PW - SL Page 1 HCM M 6th TVVSC 2024 AM •- WP - LT 2- 1 Av S & Site Access OBM2021 Inlemec�on knt Delay, siveh 1 Movement WBL WBR eNBT NER SBL SBT mane Canfiguralions ' ' t+ ` Traffic Vol, veA 27 54 745 24 16 375 Fubire VCA, veh1h 27 54 745 24 16 375 Conflidng Peds, #hir 0 O 0 0 0 O Sign Control stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channeliaed - None None - None Storage Length 0 25 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 7 1 Peak Hour Factor 100 104 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Writ Flaw 27 54 745 24 16 375 A4� oslfu4m Miriorl1a 1 M • Cortflicting Flow All 977 385 0 0 769 0 Stage 1 757 - - - - - tage 2 220 - - - - Cri5cal Hdviy 6.84 6.94 4.14 Critimal Hdwy Stg 1 5-84 - - - CrIcal Hdwy Stg 2 5-84 - - - - Follow -Up Hdwy 3-52 3-32 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Manwver 248 613 - - 841 Stage 1 424 - - - - Stage 2 795 - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 243 613 - 841 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 345 - - tage 1 424 - - - Stage 2 780 Approa& WB NB SB HCIJ Comrol Decay, s 13.9 0 U.4 HCM LOS B MirrorlaneM - rMvmt NBT NBRVffiLn1 SBl- SBT Capacity (vehlh) 487 841 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0 1,36 HCM Control Delay (s) 139 9.4 HCM Lane LOS B .A HCM 95th Me veh) 0-6 0-1 2018 TMC 5:00 pm O11002018 2024 AM - WP Synchro 10 tight Report PVV - L Page 1 H C M 6th TVVSC 2024 AAA - WP - LT I Site Access & S 348 St 08130021 Intersection int Delay, sdveh 0-b Movement EBT FBR WILL VVBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations ti Ili -I t Tfafflc Vol, vehPh 1420 42 29 685 0 62 Future Vol, vehlh 1420 42 29 685 0 62 Donflio#ing Peds, "r 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Chan nelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 25 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Gfade, % 4 -1 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 104 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Plow 1420 42 29 685 0 62 Majorll noT Malorl Majorz phriorl Conflidq Flow All 0 0 1462 0 731 Stage 1 - - - - - - SWge 2 - Dritical Hdwy - 4,14 - - 6,94 Critical Hd%vy Stg 1 - - - - CMical Hdwy SIg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.22 - 3.32 P-ot Gap-1 Maneuver - - 458 0 364 Stage 3 - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - 0 - Platoan blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 458 - - 364 Mow Gap-2 Maneuver - - - Sta�e- Stage 2 Approach EB W13 Ne HCM Control Delay, s 4 0.5 16.9 HCM LOS C Manor LanoXalor Mvmt NBLn1 E?T EBR wVBL WK Capacity (veNbj 3A - - 458 HCMLaneWRatio 0.17 0.063 HCM Conlroi Delay (s) 16.9 13-4 HGM Lane LOS B HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) Q - - 0, - 2018 TMC 5:00 prn 01W2015 2024 AM - WP Synchra 10 Light Report PVV - SL Page 1 HCM 6thTVV 0 4AM-UVP-LT 4- S 348 St & Office Driveway 0860021 Inersecbon tnt Delay, slveh Movement EBL EBT WBT VVBR SBL 56R Lane Configijra6ons "I tt tt Traffic Vol, ve* 7 1475 713 4 1 1 Future Vol- vehih 7 1475 713 4 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Soap RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 25 p Veh in Me&m Storage, # - 0 0 Grade, % - 4 -1 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 1475 713 4 1 1 MamoriWnor Ma- t1 Maor2 Minor2 orn9idn9 flow A 717 0 0 1467 359 Stage t - - - 715 - Stage 2 - 752 - oftal Hdwy 4.14 6.84 6.94 Crit ml Hdwy So 1 - - 5.84 - Criflcal Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5,84 Follow-up Hdwy 2-22 3.52 3-32 Pot Cap -I Maneuver 880 - - - 119 638 Stage 1 - - 446 - tage 2 - - - - 426 - Platoon blacked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 880 - - 118 638 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 252 - Stage 1 - - - 442 S€age 2 426 Pzo EB WB SE HGM Control Delay, s 0 0 15 HCM LO UllnorLanelMajorMvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (vehfh) 880 - - 361 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.008 - 0.006 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - - - 15 HCM Lane 1_OS A - - C HCM Wh %file 0(veh) 0 - - - 0 2018 TMC 5:00 pm 00212018 2024 AM -'YVP Synchro 10 Light Report PVV - SL Page i HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2018 PM 4 40; 1 Av S & SVV Gam us Dr/S 348t 111282020 t - I EBL EBT EER 4VBL AT WBR NSIL NET NBR SEL Si3T Lana Configurations +14 tt F +14 �i tt rrt Traffic Volume (veh1h) 123 612 104 430 1086 131 67 186 65 142 587 276 Future Voltime (vehM) 123 612 104 430 1086 131 67 186 65 142 587 M Initial Q (Qb), vah 6 0 0 0 9 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Pcd-Biwc Adj(A-pbT, 1 ML 0.99 1-00 0.99 1.pp 0.98 T-0L1 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 0.99 1-00 1-00 0.99 1-00 1-00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 Work Zoge On Approach NO No .'vlo -No AcFj Sat Flaw, vebNln 1761 1761 1761 1909 1909 1909 1567 1567 1567 1988 1988 1988 Adj Flaw Rate, veh h 129 644 109 457 1155 139 75 2C9 73 167 691 325 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.96 9.94 0-94 0.94 0.89 0-n 0,8q 0.85 0-85 0.85 Percent Ho<iwy Veh, % 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap,vehfh 171 1025 173 808 1958 1023 90 383 129 191 821 446 A:rive C,7 Green 0.0.5 0.36 0-35 0.23 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.18 U.1 i C.1 C 0.22 -3.22 Sat Flow. ve h 3254 2848 481 3528 3628 159E 492 2165 731 1893 3777 1648 Grp Volume(v): vehlh•. 129 378 37 5 457 ' 155 139 75 142 ::9 167 69' 325 Grp Sat F2'ow(s),vehbin 1627 1673 1656 1764 1814 1W 1492 1489 1307 1893 1889 1648 C25'rwe(;t_Sl, s 5.9 28.0 28.2 17.2 32.3 5,1 7.5 13.0 13.7 13-0 26.3 21.1 Cycle Q lear(g.,c), S 5.9 28.0 28,2 17-2 32-3 5.1 7.6 13.0 13,7 13.0 26.3 21.1 Prop 19 Lane 1.011) 0.29 1.00 ' .N 1.00 0.52 1-00 1-00 L2ne Grp Oap(c)- vehlh 171 602 596 808 1956 1023 90 263 249 1 821 446 54-Ratio(}(; 0.75 �. 3 0.0 0-57 0.59 0.14 0 83 0.54 0.56 98 0.84 0-73 Avail ap(c_a�, veh14 228 602 5913 808 1958 1023 99 298 281 967 505 HCM Plstoon Ratio 00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1-CO 1.OG 1.00 T C-0 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fftql) 0,94 0.94 0.94 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.84 0-84 Uniform Delay {dj. slMeh 70.1 39.7 3i .8 51.2 23-3 10.6 89.7 56.1 567 66.5 562 31.5 Incr Relay (d2). sfveh 5.8 4-6 4.7 0.6 1-3 0-3 36.7 0,6 0.7 20.8 4-5 3.0 Ir,ltla+ Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 00 00 C.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackM(M),vWn 4.6 17-8 17-8 12.2 20-1 3-4 6.8 8,6 6.6 11.5 18,4 13.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, siveh LnGrp Delay(d),sfveh T5.9 44.3 44-5 51.8 24. 10-9 106.4 56.8 57.4 87.3 60-7 $4.5 LnGrp LOS C C D D C B O Approach Vol. vehlh 882 1751 357 1133 Approach D-slay, shreh 49.0 30.6 67.5 57.3 Approach LOS D E E �1 7 3 4 .5 7 8 - - Phs DuraWn (G#Y}Rc), s 20.1 31.5 9-3 59.0 14.0 37-6 12.4 86.0 Ch.=rge Period fY=Re}, s 5-0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5.0 5.0 4.5 {.0 Max Grceri Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 28.0 54-0 10.0 38-0 10-5 72.0 Max Q Clear Time fg_ c+111, s 15-0 -5.7 i 9.2 30-2 9.5 28.3 79 34.3 Green Ex; erne (p_c), s D-1 1.6 0.8 6-1 0.0 4.3 0-1 13.8 HCT,A Gt� Cbi Delay 45.2 HCM Bth LOS D 2018 TMG 5.00 prn 0110212018 2024 PM - VV0 Synchro 10 Light Report PVJ - SL Page 1 Queues 2018 PM 4840, 1 Av S & SW Campus DOS 348 SI 1112812020 WEL WBT WSR NU- WST SILL . $, SBR Lane G p Flow (vph) 129 753 45+ 1'v5 139 75 282 167 691 325 V,t RatiG 0-62 0-57 0.71 0_63 0.14 Q.74 0-47 U6 0.85 0-63 ; ntrol Dela, 76.5 30.3 48.6 -.3.5 1.2 306.9 54.0 95.9 57-{ 33. E Queue De18y 0.0 4,0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0-4 4-0 0.0 0,0 0-0 Tot:J N?iav +6 30.3 48.6 13.5 1.2 176.9 5A-0 95.9 57.5 331 Queue Length 501h (ft} 65 277 M 237 10 77 103 161 342 188 Queue Length 95tb (it} 104 352 285 280 5 W152 160 0244 328 ;80 1 memal UO Dist (it) 750 556 292 1085 Turr. Bay Length rR) 175 275 25D 15G 400 225 Base Capadly (vph) 232 1312 641 1839 1035 rt11 666. 213 9M 528 Siariatior. uup Reduc",n 0 0 0 0 0 9 G 0 9 0 Spillbmk Cep Redudii 0 0 0 9 Q 0 0 0 9 0 SWage Cap RedLICJI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k 0 0 Raduce a+c Rat'o 0.56 0.57 0.71 0.63 0-13 D.oa 0-42 0.78 0.76 0,62 Imersedon Summary - - - - - Desuiptoa:7rafcCouit. Consultant -"I(}J 014 V 9W pu?mer:=.ile volume excce% oopac;;ty: queue may I longer - Queue shovrn is m"rnum after itivo cycles. 2018 TMC 5:00 pm OV02+2018 2024 PM - WO Synarc) 10 Light Report PW - SL Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 PM - WO 4640: 1 Av S & SVV Campus Dr/S 348 St 1112812020 t- l EBR VVBL - WER NBL . NB T NSR SBt Lane Configurawo 11) tT,. n tt T ffic Volrrrne (wehrh) 140 690 115 485 1225 150 75 210 75 160 660 310 FL:'tJre Vclumc "veh.-b) 140 6�Q 115 465 1225 150 75 21.0 7L� 160 6K, 310 Inital Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Dike„ Wife, abTl 1.00 0. 1.00 0.99 1.0C 0.q8 1.00 0.99 PerkingBus,Adj "lm 1.00 0-99 U0 1.00 0.99 t-00 1,0f} 0-99 1-00 IN 0-99 WorkZGmi an ,approach No No No NO Adj Sat Fbow, vetrlhiln 1761 1761 1761 1909 1909 1909 150-7 1567 1567 1988 1988 1988 wdj riow Rate, vchfn 147 725 121 516 1303 160 84 236 84 188 776 365 Peak Flour Factor 0.95 0.95 0-95 0.94 0.94 0-94 0.39 0.89 0-89 035 0.86 0-85 Apr,.-ni Heavy Ve4. % 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap.veb;b 189 1037 173 724 1852 994 99 406 141 211 887 484 Arrivi� On Green 0.06 0.36 C.36 0.211 051 0.51 0.07 019 0.18 0.11 0.23 0.?.3 Sat Flaw,vehfh 3254 2855 476 3528 3628 1596 1492. 2152 743 1893 3777 1650 Grp Vol-Jme(v),veh.h 147 425 422 sib 1303 160 84 1v1 15 188 776 3fi5 Grp Sat Etaw(s),vehh.Iln 1627 1673 1657 1764 1814 1596 1492 1489 1406 1893 1889 1650 51�rve(a sl: s 6.'r' 32-6 32.6 20.4 41 2 6.3 8.4 14.7 15.5 14.7 29.7 23.2 Cycle Q Gl ar(g_c), s 6.7 32-6 32.6 20.4 41-2 63 8-4 14-7 15.5 14.7 9-7 23.2 Prof Ii. Lane 1.00 0,29 1.00 1.00 t.00 C.53 .00 1.00 Large Grp Cap(c), veh t7 189 608 $02 724 1852 994 99 293 267 887 484 Vr'C Ratio;Xti C.78 0.70 .0.70 C-. 71 0.'0 016 0.84 0,57 0-60 �0.89 0.W 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 228 608 60Z 724 1852 994 99 298 281 957 515 HCV, Platoon Rai;o 1.00 1.N '.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 100 1.00 1.70 1-00 Up64re2m-Filter(I) 0.�4 0.94 0.94 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.DD 100 0.84 0.84 0.84 Uniform Dv°lay (d), s vela 69.7 408 40.9 55.5 28-0 11.9 69.2 552 r�5-8 6:.7 55.: NA Incr Delay (d2), sfveh 9.9 6.2 6.3 2.8 2.3 0-3 43.3 1.3 2.0 26,0 6.9 4.3 Initial 0 7ol�,y(d31.sr++eh 0.0 G-.) 0-G 00 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °,idle PWk=(95%),vehfln 5.5 20.4 203 14-4 25.2 4- 7-8 9.5 9.6 13.4 20.7 14-4 I.:nsi3. i'ADVUFTIerlt Delay, SNeh LnGrp Delay(d),51veh 79. 4-7.0 47.2 58.3 30-3 12.3 112-5 56.5 57.7 91-7 62.2 33.7 _rr LS D C E B F E E F Approach Vol, vehh 994 1979 404 1329 ,approach Dday, sfwel 51,.v 36.2 68.6 58.6 Approach LDS D D E .. # .... :.Phs 1 Phi Duration (G+Y+Rc}, s 2�.7 33.5 35.8 59.0 15-0 40.2 13-2 81,6 Cnance Oerlod iY+Rc;. s 5.0 5 G 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 S.0 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 18.0 30-0 28-0 54.5 10-0 38.0 10-5 72.0 MaxQu,ear7ime(9 c+:`;. 16.7 17.5 22.4 34.6 10.4 317 8.7 43.2 Time (p._c), s 0.0 1.7 0-6 6-5 0,0 3-5 0.1 14.5 +-ree�n.,,Ex,t H Y, 5th Ct;t De3ay 48.6 HUI 6th CGS D 2018 71VIC 5:00 pm 01102018 2024 Pit - WO Syriohri� 10 Light Report PW - SL Page 1 Queues 2024 PM - WO 4840: 1 Av S & SW Campus Dr/S 348 St 1112812020 I 4- --' GE , .,.. ESL E Hkr, , I�L W9T 'W�R: �k ' N BT SSL . T BIR Lar:e G-o°jp :'low {vphi 14r 471 515 13M 180 $4 3-C. 188 776 365 v1c Rabo 0_69 0.67 0.80 0.74 0.16 OM 0_51 0.92 0.90 OM on oiDelay $0.6 33.8 54.4 18.9 13 113.1 53.2 105.1 61.1-1 33.0 Queue Detay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O_0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ToAIOelay 80.6 33.8 54.4 18.9 1.3 113.1 53.2 1051 61.5 33.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 75 341 262 5$8 11 84 113 184 3a4 199 Queue Length 95th (ft'1 116 393 331 413 5 0175 18� 929'. 4G3 104 Internal Lind Dist (ft) 750 556 292 IG85 T,irn } Lengtr (ft) 175 U5 250 150 400 225 Base Capdty(YPh} 232 1270 641 1772 A14 ill 666 213 906 548 St{r 91icn Cap Reduckri iJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 C. 0 SPilback Cap R&-ductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 Storage Cep Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 G Reduced v!c Ratia 0.63 0.67 0A 0_74 0.,16 0.76 0 0.88 0.86 0_67 Inte:seclon Sumo 2 Ges�>pron: Traffic Count Coi}sultant- 10r'222J; 3,.5tn perco.nki:e �p;urn8 exceees :ap�Ciky, queue may be longer, Qeet� sMwn is maximum efker two cycles. 2018 TMC 5:00 pm 0110MO18 2024 PM - VV0 Sknchro 10 Light Report PW - SL Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 Phi - 1 P - w1 VVBLT at Access 4840: 1 Av S & SW Garr u Dr/S 348 St 08f" 12021 Movement EEL - ERR WBL WST WBR NRL NBT NBR SBR Laiie Gor)Nusations + Vi +t ?" I + T4 tt r Traffic Volume (veh1h) 140 693 119 482 1219 149 86 229 75 172 671 310 Future Volume (vehih) 140 693 119 482 1219 149 85 229 75 172 671 310 Initial 0 (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus: Adj 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1_00 1.00 0,99 1.00 1.00 0.99 Work Zone C�n Approad No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh!#E n 1761 1761 1761 1909 1909 1909 1567 1567 1567 1988 1988 1988 Adj Flaw Rate_ vehlh 147 729 125 513 1297 159 97 257 $4 202 789 365 team Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, veht 191 956 164 767 1798 982 114 432 138 226 905 493 Arfiue On Green 0.06 0..34 0.33 0.22 0.50 0.50 0.08 0.20 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veNh 3254 2841 487 3528 328 1595 1492 2202 70'1 1893 3777 1650 Grp Volume(v), veh+h 147 429 425 513 1297 159 97 172 169 202 789 365 Grp Sat Flows),vehlMn 1627 1673 1654 1764 1814 1595 1492 1489 1415 1893 1889 1650 erve(g_s), s 6.7 34.3 34.4 20.0 42.1 6.4 9.6 15.7 16.4 15.8 30.1 22.5 Cycle 0 Clear(g-c), s 6.7 34.3 34.4 20,0 42-1 6.4 9.6 15.7 16.4 15.8 30.1 22.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Lane Gfp Cap(c}, vehl� 191 563 557 767 1798 982 114 292 27$ 905 493 VIC Ratio(X) 0.77 0.76 0.76 0.57 0.72 0.16 0.85 0.59 0.61 0,89, 0.87 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a}: veht 293 563 557 767 1798 982 129 303 288 278 982 527 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FiJWT(I) 0.94 0.94 0.94 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.84 Uniform Delay (d): s+veh 69.6 "A 44.5 53.7 9.7 12.3 68.4 54.7 55.3 65.1 54.8 28.1 Incr De1ay (d2), "eh 2.4 8.9 9.0 1.8 2.5 0.4 32.9 1.8 2A 19.8 6.5 3.7 Iniltal Q De1ay(Q,s, v h 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 %iie Ba0KM951A),vehlln 5.1 21.8 21.7 14.0 25.8 4.3 8.3 10.1 10.1 13.3 20.9 14.0 Urisig. Movement Delay: slveh LnGrp Delay(d),siveh 72.1 53.3 53.5 55.6 3 _2 12.7 101.3 58.5 57.7 84.9 61.4 31.8 LnGrp LOS E D D E B B F E E F E C Approach Vol, vehI4 1001 1969 438 1356 Approach Delay, Vveh 56.1 36.7 669 56.9 Approaa LOS E D E E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 +� 8 Phs Mration (G+Y+R), s 22.9 34.5 37.6 50.0 16.4 40.9 13.3 79.3 Change Period {Y+Rc), s 5.0 " 5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 Max Green Setting {Gmax), s 22.0 031 28.0 50.5 13.0 39.0 13.5 65_0 Max Q Clear Time (g .�+11), s 17.8 18.4 22.0 36.4 11,8 32.1 8.7 44.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.8 0.8 5.5 0.0 3.8 0.1 12.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrs Delay 4.9.3 KCM 61h LOS D Notes HCM 6th computational engine requires egtial clearance times for the phases cro,3sirrg the barrier. 2018 TMG 5:00 pro 0110212018 2018 Counts on Base Kebmrk Synchro 10 Light Report PVW - SL Page 1 Queries 2024 P - 1P - wi 11VBLT at Access 4840: 1 Av S & SVV Cara us DFIS 848 St O'M2021 -0, .4--- ! Lane Group EBL E=BT VVBL UVBT VVBR NBL NM SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 854 513 1297 :59 97 341 202 789 365 vic Ratio 0.62 0.71 0,80 0.77 0,16 0.75 0.52 9.86 0.89 0.65 Conhmi Delay 75.6 37.5 52.3 21.9 1.5 101.0 53_9 91.9 60.4 30.5 Queue [delay 0.0 O_Q M 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 75.6 3 7. 5 52.3 21.8 1.5 101.0 53.9 91.9 60.4 30.5 Queue Length 50th (Fk) 75 354 259 600 12 96 123 193 88 186 Queue Length 951h (ft) 115 419 311 531 12 #176 205 4274 387 193 Intemal Link Oist (ft} 750 556 292 1085 Turn Bay Length (fl) 175 275 250 150 400 225 Base Cap Y(wph) 298 1205 641 1680 1013 145 677 261 930 686 Starvation Cap Reductri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sollbadk Cap F ducin 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vl(, Ratio 0.49 0.71 0.80 0.77 0.16 0.67 0.50 0.77 0.85 0.62 Intersection Surnmary description; Traffic Count ConsuiWt- 1=2014 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue May be longer_ Queue gown is maximum afW two cycles. 2018 TM 5:00 pm 0V02120:8 2018 Counts an Base Network Synch.o 10 Light RePM P - SL Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SurnrnaTy 2024 PM - VVP - wl WE3LT at Access - Optimized 4840: 1 Av S & SVV Campus Or/S 348 St 11128l2020 Ir Lace Corit;guratiors M 0 tt r t +t rrt Traffic Volurne {vehlh) 140 693 119 483 1220 149 84 27 75 171 671 310 �utcre Volume (-deh h) `4G 693 119 483 1220 14J 8* 227 75 171 671 319 Ii1itia; Q (Qb}, veh 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A- pbT) i.01) 0.99 1.00 0.99 ' 00 0.98 #.00 0.99 Parking Bras, Atff 1.00 UH) 0.99 1.00 1-00 0.99 1,00 1-00 0.99 1-00 1.00 0.99 k' ork Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow. vehUln 1761 1761 1761 1909 1909 1909 1567 1%7 1567 1988 198B 1988 Adi Fb%v Rate: vehfg 147 729 }5 514 '1298 159 94 255 84 201 789 365 Freak Hour Facbr 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0-94 0.89 0-89 0-89 0.85 0.B5 0.95 -Percent Heavy Veh. % 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap. vWh 191 956 1134 775 1805 985 Ill 428 137 225 905 493 Arrive On Green 0.08 G.34 0.33 0 22 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.19 0.19 0 12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, vehM 3254 2841 487 3528 3628 1695 1492 2197 706 1893 3777 1650 GrD Volumetvj, vehrh 147 429 425 514 12-5 159 94 171 168 20: 7$9 365 Grp Sat Flows( j,veh)h?In 1627 1673 1 654 1764 1814 1596 1492 1489 1414 1893 1889 1650 Q rvefg sj, s 6.7 34.3 34. t 200 42.0 6.4 93 15.6 16.4 157 30.1 22.6 Cycle Q Clear(c_cJ. s 6-7 34.3 34,4 20-0 42.0 6.4 9-3 15.6 16.4 15-7 30.1 22.6 Prop In Lare 1.00 0.29 1.00 t-OD 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap((,). vetUh 191 563 557 775 1805: 985 111' 290 275 225 9'05 493 V,'C Ratio(}() 0 77 0.76 0.76 0.66 0.72 0.16 0-85 0.59 0.6' 0.89 0.87 0.74 Avail Cap(o_a), vehlh 293 563 557 T75 1805 985 129 298 233 278 982 527 H CM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1 0{] 1 00 1.00 1-H 1.00 ' .00 1 co 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Upstream: ilter{I) 0.94 0-94 0-94 1.00 1,00 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.00 0.84 0-84 0.84 Uniform Delay (d; siveh 69.6 44.4 445 53-5 29.5 12 7 68.6 54.9 55.4 65. i 54.6 283 Incr Delay (U), -gveh 2.4 8.9 9-0 1-7 2.5 0-4 31,E 1.9 2-6 19-6 6.5 3-7 Initial Q Dulav(0'.!�veh 0.0 0.0 U 00 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 H 0 G 0.0 0.0 Wile ack0fQ(95%),vehAn 5.1 21-8 21.7 14.0 25.7 4.3 8-0 10.0 10.1 13-2 20.9 14.0 U,1s;g MavcmPnt aetay: Wveh UGrp 00iy(d),sfveh 72.1 53.3 53,5 56.2 32,0 12.6 90-8 56.8 58.0 84.7 61-4 31.9 LnGrp LOS E D D E C B F E E F E C Approach Vol, vehih 1001 1971 433 1355 Approach pelay, s vetr 56.1 36.5 66.6 56.: Approach LOS E D E E 3. 4 5 _6 � 8 Ptrs Duration (G-+Y*Rc), s 22-8 34.2 37.9 55-0 16.1 40,9 13-3 79.7 Change Period fY+Rcj, s 5 0 5.0 5.9 4.5 5.0 5.0 4 5 5.0 Max Green. et#ing (Gmax), s 22.0 30.0 28.0 50.5 13-0 39.0 13-5 65-0 Vax Q Clear Time (e c+Ii:; s 17.7 18-4 22.0 36.4 11 3 32.1 8.7 44 0 Green at Time { _�), s 0A 1.8 0.8 5.6 0-0 3.8 0.1 12-0 ITEM 6th Ctrl Delay 49.2 HCM 61h LOS C 2018 TMC 5-00 pm 01±0212016 2018 Counts on Base Network Synchro 19 Ligfit Report P - 5L Page 1 Queues 2024 PM -VVP- VVBLT atAccess -C ]mized 4840:1AvS&SVV Campus D@S348S g rFV2020 . N } § \ \ \ m Group FlcPN M 147 eq 514 138 !m m sa m] AS ms Yk Ratio 0.e2 0-71 ¢m *77 I S 74 0.53. I« E » *35 Ccrikl Dehy rs 373 524 217 is 1007 54-e gJ 604 »a AB Delay 02 EG 0 0.0 U 0.0 02 RD G.0 0) Total ay a3 23 4 /7 !$ 1002 9$ m« 60¢ 33 Cume Leqglh M hp 75 aR 30 g§ 12 p 123 193 k§ 187 me hgc A v; xB 312 So 12 M q 214 129 aZ 193 men Likmd A 750 76 292 107 n Baya thA 95 275 30 1,50 qo 25 2se Capacity (vph) M 139 641 167 ]D! ]q 667 34 mB 57 S"apiation p &mot o 0 0 0 0 u 0 J n 0 Smtaa CapRk2tn o o 0 o g n n o 0 0 Storage Cap du r) C. 0 0 0 0 0 a B Q n R+2W vic R «o E q m m o: E77 $]e 0-65 051 0.77 & 0-62 \ksectimSum maR cip iTraffic. Co3t CoSubm-] 2,224 ¥ Wig mr file ume exceeds2Aa\ 7qR maybelonger. CuseAown is maximum d« two dm. mmTlh[y0opm 01102018mmG& on Bare Netmrk A«¥n]oLight Report my- SL Page1 H M 6th TWSC 2024 PM - VIP - w/ WBLT at Access 1 Av S & Site Access 0 30r'2021 lrntemation In! Delay, sNeh 0-5 Movement VVBL WBR NBT NBR SBL 313T Lare Configuratiorns Y ++ Vi tt T refflc Vol, vehlh 20 34 357 23 18 1255 suture Vol. vehth 20 34 367 23 18 1255 fionliiOrkg Peels, #1hr 0 0 0 a 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - Norte - None Storage Length 0 - - 25 - Veh in Wdian Storage, # 0 0 - - 0 Grade, 0 7 - - 1 Peak Hour Faobr 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,'A 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 20 34 357 23 18 1255 A+ear�h�lHtor Miroarlf Maiort Ma �or2 Conflicting Flow All 1033 190 0 0 380 0 Stage 1 369 - - - Stage 2 664 - - Grifiical Hdwy 6-84 6.94 - - 4,14 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - Criticat Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - 2.22 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 228 820 - - 1175 - Stage t B70 - - Stage 2 474 - - - - Platoon blacked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 225 820 - - 1176 Mov Gap-2 Maneuver 348 - - - - - Stage 1 670 - - - tage 2 467 - Approach WB NB 8 HCM Control Delay, 5 12.3 0 0.1 Minor Lane a• r Mvrflt NBT N6RVA3Ln1 SBIL S5T Capaaty (veWh) - - W 1175 - HCM Lane VIC Raiio 0.099 0.015 - HCM fianbV belay (s) - 12.3 8.1 - HCM Lane LOS - B A - HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) - 01 0 2018 TM 5,00 pm 0110212018 2018 Counts on Base N Avork Syrichro 10 Light Report PVC - SL Page 1 HCM 6th CSC 2024 P - VVP - wl VVBLT at Access 3: Site Access & S 348t 08M12021 Intersection ant Delay, s'veh C.� Wvement EBT EBP, IAIBL WBT NBA NBR Lane Configurations � T4 tf r Traft Vol, vehh 921 19 36 1850 0 24 Future Vol, uehih 921 19 36 1850 0 24 Cori idng Pods, #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free free Stop Stop RT Gharinelized - None - None None Storage Length - 25 - 0 Veh to Median Storage, # g - - 0 0 - Grade. % 4 -1 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 921 19 36 18M 0 24 Majvr"*r Majarl maitoa Mimd Conflicting Flow All 0 0 W 0 470 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - Gritical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6-94 Critical Hdwy Stq 1 - Critical Kdwy Stg 2 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 725 - 0 W Stage t - 0 - Stage 2 - - 0 - Ptaloon blocked, % - Mov Dap-1 Maneuver - 725 - - 540 Mov Gap-2 Maneuver - - - tage I - - SWge 2 Approach ES UWB NB HGM Control Delay, s 0 0-2 12 HCM LOS B ldlinor Lane?Maior MYrnt NEW EBT ESR UIIBL VgBT calWity (veh?h) 540 r'25 HCM Lane WC R<itio 0.044 O:v.S HCM GonVol Delay (s) 12 - 10.2 HCM Lane LOB B B HCM 95th °futile Q(veh) 01 0 2018 TMC 5:00 pm 01 M212018 2019 Counts on Base WwA SynchTo 10 Light Report P - SL Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 P -1 P - wJ WELT at Access 4: S 348 St & Driveway to east 08f3O12021 Intersedion Ink Qe;ay: s vuh #Aowement EBL E87 WBT WBR SBl_ SBR Lane Configurations`' t Traffic Vol, weh1h i 9 4 1890 1 4 6 Future Vol. VehM 1 944 1880 1 4 6 Conflicting Peds, #1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Gontrol Free Free Free Frec Stop Stop R7 Channelized - None -None None Storage Length 25 Veh in Median Storage, #k - l} 0 - 4 - rade, % - •1 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 IGO 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvrnt Flow 1 944 I880 1 4 6 Mad fl� .mr Majorl Mama Mlnor2 Conflicting Flow All 1881 0 0 2355 941 Stage 1 - - - 1881 - Stage 2 - - - 474 - Critical Hdwy 4,14 - - - 6,84 6,94 Critical Ftdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.84 - Cri4 l Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 3-52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 315 - - - 30 264 Slage 1 - - 106 - S#age 2 - 592 - Platocm blocked- - MDv Cap-1 Maneuver 315 - - - 30 29 Maw Cap-2 Maneuver - - 88 - 1 - - - - 106 Stage 2 - - 592 roach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 C 31.3 HCM LOS D I&orLanelMaiorMvmt EBL E87 WBT VBR SSLnl Capacity (vehm) 315 1L7 HCM Lane WC Rallo .0.003 0.Cu68 HCUl Como] Delay (s) 16.5 31 3 HCM Lane LOS C D HCM 95th %tilie 0(veh) 0 - - 0,2 2018 TMC 5:00 pm 01IO2t 018 2018 Counts on Base Netwofk Synched 10 Light Report F V - GL Page 1 k \ & I % 7 >1 � tin $ � m � U y � ¥ f � e 2 U) LL.\ R 2 -: a § Ek \ k E '5 0 mCL tn w D� 12 g � � � 2 U � R � � m \ > « k k E I 3.. � � � � @ � ■ � U > / 0 f � d � ■ L 460 \ 2 E 2 \ % E n- � CL Ln w x w CL � � 2 2 U 2 m W � a \ 2 6 % � � � ■ $ � m � U » 2 � � 0 L _ 0 a fL f .2 q > � � E CL � tA W � w CL � � k 0 � � (n 2 � W k � m \ > « \ 3 0 (D z 0 411 O CL w ix � � E E D yl 2 2 � � $ 0 2 im 2 2 U is 2 � I / \ � \ CL / � � � � ■ $ � � e U � 2 � � 2 o 2 � LM 0 < E CL CL k tn J w J 9 � � 2 @ q v � � .2 Cq / V �m W W L T � C4 L.L. 41 L O O 21 o 2 L L: CG W c o 3 EJ o a o D LA w a: w C) N LA r e en u Q q�p O} = 3 7 � p m N CL $ } - (13 L P 7 U} � r m d �' 4 � 4 CL 0 ❑ � m e � g � � 3 � C m R Le) O � � C - t4 CD � � C _ d} m � C 4+ 6 4 p .� x -0 in 4} C Cl G} Q iV Lo U T O 8 ro U ro _0 � m w L] v � c 4 of G 4D CL-0 E O C] 7-. EO 53 CL 0 CL ilf tn �J L O E 3 W W � a M 0 u. M 10 � � L rn g au ¢v�i LL. 2 sa OF c 7 44 Q -E� _ r O S4 C � � C 4 � � (Uol g 6 {6 ZF qj O R} [i O 7 O 4L3 O O rp M. E t V � iFi O � — � O aP 3. QF � L 4 � � C rr, VJ 47 � e � 0 o � � O � � o � S W a � e rri m U C p m O [} L ff � � O � � O W o o o s� C O r, 4 C } Dd B L % {5 = C Z5 @ d -0 L E CL m Q Y ca to CL O z im {6 V m Iu N O � « � 6 t \ _ % � � � Ln @ � � � U 2 � � 2 \ 4 \ 0 L- � m IN 0- R C9 _ o :3 > -1 a E � k I un J J J g � � 2 2 U w 3 � & - m « £ / y � - - � > 0 8- a _ kA af 0 M @ Ix >1 00 E E � � Cr) q � > � a m � CL � � � � » k � \ e cis -1—A CL 4) m JOL ; dl r a) cq CD tO 0 8 In cq +- sz. > > c: w r 0 1-. 0 C*4 C4 06 —E a jr 16. 3C3 zi U— dD char ra t, u A 'I}a. 71 Cs` lk AV -�ii' P ti+ � 3t 'f� W 2f%d l r+ 4 A. x E9 � � o m LL7 PUBLIC WORKS DFIVARTMENT YM5 W" Avenue South CITY OF Vzk��Fedml Way WA 9W3-i325 l Way 253�-835-27Q0; fax 253-$35-2709 Federav4'v4 �v. t' ll t'a ��lrai�•r:�lw:,,y.C� ti ti TRAFFIC YMPACT FEE PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS The City of Federal Way iim adopted a 'traffic impact Fee Pro -rain (`E 1 ) t0rdinamce W-627) with an effective implementation slate of July 1, 20I0. This guideline is designed to assisl thte development community in understanding the Traffic Impact ret: Program_ hat are Traffic Impact Fees? Impact fees are charges based on a set fee assessed on all new development activity to pay for capital improvements that are needed to scr-+t: new development_ 'Traffic irtrpaut fees are collected to improve the transportation system to accommodate the higher travel demand created by new deveiopment within the City I inns of Rdet`al Way, The Revi.wd Code of Washington (RCW 8 .02.050) defines traffic imimet fee progmms as intended to: ensure thin adequaie facilities are available io serve new growth; estiAhli.sh srandardy by which neiv growth end development puy a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth cmd devefcrpment: and ensure that impact fears are imposed through estvbiishedprocedures and c -lreria so char specfroc developments do nmr pay arbitrary .fetes orduplicative fees for the same impact. When is Traffic Impact Fee Due? For cominercial developrncnls. fees will be calculated based on the impael fee schedule in effect at the time a completed building pen -nit application is filed and paid prior to permit i.ssnance_ For a change in use for which no building permit is requirod. the fee will be calculated and paid Masud on the impact tee schedule in effect on the date of an approved change of uu . For all applications for single-family, multifani ly residential building permits. and co anufac tured borne permits, the total amount of the impact fc4cs will be assessed and collected from the applicant when the building perrrnt is iss cud, using the fee schedule then in effect. However, for single family residczitial dwelling the applicant may request, al any time prior to building permit issuance, to defer to final building inspection the payment of a transportation impact fee_ Refer to defer payment of impact fee code for process_ With the: deferral of the fee payment, a covenant prepared by the City to enforce payment of the deferred fees will be recorded at the applicant`s expense on each lot at the trot{ pricer to building pera71t ixsua3�ce, Exemptions e.imited exemptions are established in the impact fee ordinance_ The followilxg development activities which do not generate any new trips are, excluded from the obligation to pay traffic impact lees: • Alteration or expansion of an existing structure that does not add any square fcx(tage. • Miscellaneous irnprrovement.s which do n«t increased p.m. peak triers, including, but not limited to fences, walls, re.5idential swimming polls and signs-, • Demolition or removal of a structure within the City Miscellaneous permits such as Electrical, Fire protection System, Mechanic A Pi u mbi 11 Right-of-way um hore]ine turd sign pi~rmits; Rezones, Comprehensive plan amendments, Clearing and Grading, Commercial subdivisions, Boundary line adjustment and Lot line eliminations. Will I receive credW; against the impact fc for my land dedication andler construction? The applicant may request That a credit or credits fcrr impact fees he awarded to himfher for the total value of system improvements, including dedications of Land, improvements anwor cons,truction provided by the applicant. Credits will be given on a case -by -case ba.;is and shall not exceed the impact fee payable. Any claisin for credit most he [Wade prior to the issuance of building permit (payment of the impact fee), Credits for the, construction will be provided only if the land, irnprovernents. andlor the facility constructed are listed as planned transportation projects in the Rate Study. No credit will he given for axle -based frontage improvements or right -or -way dedicwi(ms, direct access improvements to anchor within the subject dcveloprnent unless the improvement is part of a project listed on the Rate Study. Can Impact Fee Adjustments b-e made? Yes_ The applicant may submit an independent fec calculation for tlx� development aclivily. The documentation submitted must be prepared by a traffic engineer licensed in Wkshington State and shall be limited I adjugmicas in trip generation rates and length* used in the Rate Study, The applicant will be required to pair the Oty on an hourly rate to cover the cost of reviewing the independent fete calculation. Can, I get a refund if my project does not proceed? The applicant may request for a ref md, including interest earoed on paid impact fees when: I _ The applicant does not proceed to finalize the development activity for which the: lmpact fees were impmed as required by statute or the international Building Cade, and 2. Ttie City has not expended or encumbered the impact fees in good faith prior to Ilse application for refund_ if the City has expended or encumbered the fees, in gm)d faith, oo refund will be provided. However, if within a period of three (3) years, the same or subs'D(luc m owner of the property proceeds with the same or substantially similar development activity, the owner shall be eligible for a credit. The owner must petition the City in writing and provide receipt-s of impact fees paid by the owner for a development of the same. or substantially similar nature on the satne property or same portion thereof. How is the impact fee determined for a change in use? For a change in use of an existing building or dwelling unit, including any alteration, expansion, replacement, or new accessory building that generates new trips, the impact fee will he assessed based on the difference between the new uses and the prior use. if no impact fee was required for the prior use, the impact fee for the anew use shall be reduced by an amount equal to the current impact tee rate for the pricer use - How often will Impact Fees Rates change? The T1F rates will be indexed every year based on a three-year moving average cif the Was,hington State Department of Transportation Construction Cost Index, A major update with a new rate study will occur every three years to account for new projects added to the 6-Year Tram,portation lmprovcrncni Program (TIP) and the Capital improvement Program (CIP). How do I calculate the Impact Fee amount for mY prnject? Traffic Impact Fees will be determined by the City al bUllding permit stage based nn the fee schedule in effect at the time. The T1F is wsessM based on the land use cal epry (propoNed developmeno as depicted in the, impact fee schedule multiplied by the per unit cost. T ulal Impact Fee Cast = (Total Unit of Developmera) x ( fmpacl Fee Rate per Unit) Below are examples of a typical pn)jcc(' Land Use Category Multi Family Fast Food Rest u t Genera] Office Project Size (A) 10 Dwelling l.Inits 100 Dwelling Units 2,500 Scl. ft C;FA 35,000 5q_ Ft_ C&A Impact Fee Rate (Per Unit Cost) W .999 Der Unit $6.06 -CO per urn ( per sVGFA Total Impact Fee On[ [A x B) &39,990.00 $259,300.00 95,625_00 $2 i 2,100-00 Nmek: I-� GFA = �.iCrtlii Floor 1 era Tbe reek J]xLnd is 935e rahlc der not include [lL ihrn pment 01%E adinjilkir3uve fry_ The adn}lnisuuive fee is not creditable ur refundable, and [must Ise *3 at the sauae Hine Rs the impact f4ye, Does this mean I will never have to prepare a Traffic Impact AnalysW No. The impact fee only covers off -site (raffle rnitigalion derived from punned transportation projects ui� listed in the Role Study_ Additional improvement may be required as determine oil a case -by -case basis. The following arc examples off additional requirements the applicant may need to Dire an Engineer to complete' ■ narking Demand and U ilization Specialized LAnd Use and Trip GinieXation ■ Safety analysis (Sight Distance Analysis. l ueuiag and Clap analysis) Neighborhood Traffic Impacts ■ Desi'-a of Mitigation Improvements such as signals, turn lanes, access, or new roads ■ Traffic impacts over 100 trips in other peak bourn scich as mom ing and weekeodc Can I pay the Traffic Fee instead of the pro-rata mitigation identified in the Concurrency analysis for my pendaing project` No, Any developmtmt permit application with a concurrenuy application in conjunction with 4 cornpkle land use application is vested to the currcw pro-rata mitigation system. The applicant may migxate to the impact fee system (mly if the existing land use application expires or is cancelled by the applicant. Additional Information Additional information regardit�a Traffic lrnpact Fees is available on -litre at WWw_t;StVCa 1 Vd e 1"ILW ily, Q41 n I or contact Sandy Long, Sonior'l-raaslxoriatimi VIannIng 1,nginee r (253) 535-274, or Sarady.Iong@4ti(y{3FF deralWay.011`1l, C..%TX M=Om Infamabar Y? bi dk%T-w rikilLV-TuTR,,)LIMCTMPAC7'FEE:5jRn1IFl9Ax 3 City Center (CC) Impact Fee i at+ * NONE, NIA Mull i-F-Pmily (00 Senior iluuxiask (CC) chive-i35 Bank (CC) MY Care CaRLCr (CC) ubrury (CCa Pawl Office (CC) MaVla Thaalcr fL IiwltL Club (CCF Re,miiunnt CM Hi.Eh Turrwvcr Reauurant Fag Frm-4 Rcstauram iCC: 221.3Tt, 1�-1 251 912 5E45 590 732 9;2 934 awciltng dwelling sF/GFA sftGFA sf/GFA fiffGFA seat A GFA sFJGFA sflGFA s17GFA fLH'i A S in Carter [CC] 820 _ S S �rlret �c') 850 sf1GFA F1 rmacy wirh Drrvc �hmufLh (CCy R$] sfYGFA cerrerdlOfifioe(CC) eP FA Medical Office (CO 720 SVGFA Notes: Gi A = Cimss Plnor Area { :LA = {''roes T,eaR*hk Arm CC = Cily [_anicr FOr use; Ulth UDi I of MeaMure bs SF, trip ratc k divan as tips per 1 _WO NF VPP = Vehidt: Fueling P4yitirinR (Maximum number of YvEcle..R that can be fvckd simulLaneouxly) 0.62 100 4.62 0.31 100%. (}_31 (;ameemud- Scrrises 25.82 60% F 1 i_44 12_46 75% 9-35 7.30 75 5.49 11.12 75% K.34 0,07 85% 0.06 3.53 75� 2_65 {,'rwwraerrrled - Rcx�fnpranr 7.49 60% 4.49 1-6,6)- 11.15 60% 33-&4 5f1 16.92 Lixnlnrmeia�. RoyiiSMg ;_87 7 % 2.71 10.50 759,E 7,88 10.35 50% 5.18 C'c+M errauf - rre 1.49 1 90% 1.34 3.46 75% 2.60 3.7 c rt � — r� _ r a f a Ire Y, [� «r m ti f f rl Q Q t , W/ I in L-Lt -Y) Le% V) wl — a � F� y �p ji 4' Iti W. 44 ' N o4 C4 %D y1 7J O v u-} � — f . tx M O .O ai td T C G 0 W G 4, WY co W3 N O N �y LT tipp^ 4f {aQp` Gr * QQi L-.SW .,p f+-y 40� {'a in 07 , W sp Q l `l f+ w w 04 L-, Ct ce i.} ^v c.F w . O ry — O [•I C) � G N 't�' In O Cd It O}C} , } G •f O {"{ l`'� 4`+ i'ri m Ln C4 tOYx v Li O• C`i F rw CL CP 4 u a , cd IfW z A O .a _o LL t ^� C r} [JS G m C } U _V �7 .� .D {-t -0 C%I -7 -r r- U rJ •' rl G� 00 "'r I� try i-i � tr. jl �+ Lrl Q Le I lr W) 4+7 Vi ! :r r-a Lr� O c? N t4 to xn 4a �n 4 +n cv r# r? , � r- t+ r+ o� 77 t� +� � � tr O O --� �, 1� L� 1� •-- 1� Q O O rq t-n [v N e3 rtr f-a t-i [Y f'1 C 4 •-- N .--, N oa d v-s c4 [*1 N �+'i •D Q`+ o+ c%, co c4 t- t4 co Ln r] 2; M C14 Q r O O O +O tiv N 1 rRc ,- O (4 iD n O t P op oho ohCD o Q G a0 co *4 , r+} tfs v ; It tr. Wr ffLi O C a � d i-4 O rV O N r•s w w w w w u w w w o rr a - C4 o c c•E N rrt ,may c•# �p r r-o- {*, rrt { +F �r r' T' Q`* tr, k; ar, ra %V W) v-, xv o ox 0+ o• oo ao 0o M to e4 as m ao coo r+ r- uz z F. � Vx5 H F o F4 r ra Pd ~~ C F o14 .0 z v [r ,yam " 41 ui5 - r� fi 41 " 2 CE " s. Iwyl x " tz � � � +ry � S3 'Ly � •�' � q,y � 7CC {; � *� � � PC M m f�f�� fl V L� b �4�1}} i.n V 0"'�' ' U :ll .f i � W � V} m OI OI QI OI Q GI CD of b C t� 04 V xO f-i Ok xD 94 i*] �i r K`4 M 4* n Ci � L b U x �� •C [r.� �- ,/ :r p L N N 0 O Q O O S..% O Cl C;� t- _ to I b O r. %q IM 0x b O* o0 +n y0 to kr, ke, LCS -T Iti CD �r 1 30 CO Ln o 0 o a GC) — 0 4 0 0 0 r- co n O tx fx M # O r O O v ,� %f� rrs m co ll� r. p O c•1 - oa as m . ' q yn O+ yrt oo- O ra xD o 4 r-i F- WlRil ri � � ILI ram- o o N 46 r*1 C p rw o0 6 r.1 r# r4 v rn yFi rt a* In d 0O fx 40 o yr. v-f cr +b q rn r+en 0 w O r, 4' yl} h' rz .gyp' CC O m r+y rq r rr, C p T Cs d d5 04 tiC ac r r � � O N 4> y. C► . �I V F-i ea _ Up Af ccIN �+ .r � L!L -A IX I m w� 0 0 x TYPE OF FEE $ECTION ELEVEN- RIGHT-OF-WAY ACTIVITY. (FI) Right of Way Activity Poemii Fee SECTION TY&LVE. TAXIGAe$- Pursuant to King County Fee Schedule SECTION THIRTEEN- IMPACT MMGA-nON, School Impact Fee, per dwelling unit as noted b91ow (FWP$ Re801.IJT1ON 42019-M_ Single Family Residencs Pius City Administrative F9e @ 5% Muk-Family Residenoe Plus City Administrative Fee @ 5% Mixed -Use Rssidonbal Irk a€ ofdanae v.11n OnJin$nCe N4 es-249 Flus City Adminslrative tree a 5% Titre rollomng srjod unpack fees dis,oaums apply, as fo0ows: multi-F arnily Residence • 4+ bedroom unit (0% discouint) Plus Uly Admirristre Fee a 5% Muhtl-Famkty Ri�gi¢en - 3 bedroom unit (12.6% disc*unt) PKm Crlf Aomini5tratiue Fee g 6% MulvFarniity RFLoidence - 2 bedroom unit (31.2% disaunt) Plus City Adminigtr$kive Fee Q 5% MullkFamily Residencx -1 bedroom unit (50% dV+5unt} Plus City Administrative Fee @ 5% Multi -Family Residence - Studio unit (62.5% discount) Plus f ity Adnunistnwive Fee @ 5% " 'OrdinancB No.14-757 providea 501A redkieerl yk-hppl impact We with In City Center Zone.— Nota; City Adminhstrative fee of 5% will be added to the total School Impact FeeS charged, Traffic Impact F09 (PW); Land Use A- Residential SinylC Faintly (Detached) pea U.velling WI-bWamily per dwelling Senior Housing per dwelling hldbile Home in MN Park per dwAbinp B. Commerical - Survic" Driw3An Rarkk W 6T?GVA Motel per room Motel pot mom Day Care Oenter per sftGFA Literary per sDGFjl Post Offim per gf?GFA Service Station per VFP Service Station with Mlnimart per sffGFA AUt4 Care Center per yf?GtA Marie Theater per seat Health Club per sUGFA C- Commerthal - Irrstltutional Elementary School par VIGFA Middlet.kr High Scridd per si?GFA High School par srlGFA Assi�aed Living, Nursing Home per bad Church per SUGFA HW4)ital per SIiGFA p, comrk mial - Restaurant Pestaurartit per rfeGFA High Turnover Restuukarit par SIlGFA Fast K000 ReVowant per gfP,FA Espresso with Driv9-Through per &GFA 2021 Fee "7 "4 .Srlu`Y Ax My. 1' Vr 1S {Atom L'mwr fbsahNan 'Ll4dJ3 AppW"d l2'1314 G 53,243 Sis2 51 e,04a 34500 St4,S61 $528 $16:003 $900 $14,003 $700 $11.010 5551 KOK 5400 56,001 5300 7.1354.100 3,314.OQ+r� t ,710.00 2,622-f10 40.59 4.030.00 3,094.04 5396 71 18 29.10 18.451 00 1$,Z�99 0o 706 358.04 16.33 3.79 6.23 5.85 2,736.00 3.69 6.32 30.2$ 26.06 66.61 67.85 2D21 TYPE OF FEE Fee SECTION THIRT;CN. IMPACT MITE A N- aontlnued E- Cammeraial - Retail Silopping Shgppiny Center per sf1GLP, $uperrnarket per sflGFA Opnvenienae Market per 010 FA Free Standing Diyppuni $tore per sflG FA HardvvarelPaint Store per s40FA Variety Stwe per sUGFA Funaare Store per 5fI ,FA Home Improvement 81upef,.tofe per sflGFA Phamucy with Drive -Through per SffGFA Car Sales - NewrlJsed per sflGFA F�, Commercial • Office General Office pet sAGFA Meow Ofrioe per sfIGFA fie. In¢ugtrf$I Ligtlt lodustrylMarnlfactudrig per gffGFA Heavy mdrtglry per 5fiG FA InguStriel Park per sfIC FA Irani-warehousel3torage per sf1GFA Warehousing per sfIGFA C ity Center Impact Fee Rats A- Residential B. Commercial - S@Nlces Driveln B2r1k {t C} per 9[GFA Day Cara ciBmar (CC} per sVGf-A Library (CC) per $Vr7 A r-'ost 01fim (0C) per sfX FA Mcwie Theater (CC) per seat Heolth Club (GC) per sUGFA C- Commercial - Restaurant Restaurani fCC) per sFiGFA High Tumpver Restaurant (CC) per sf?G FA FaW Fpgd Re9kauranl (CC) per rVGFA D. Commiorcf8l - ROO Shopping Shopplrkg Center (CC) per WGLA Supermarket (CC) per sf?GFq Pharmacy with Drive-Tluou�h (CC) per sfjGFA E- Ccmmerclal - Office General Office (CC) per sbGFA Medical Office (CC) per sYGFA GFA = Gross r4oar Area GL4 - Gross Leasable Area CC = City CerrteF Far uses with Unrt of ldeasww w sF, trip rate rs given as trips per ?, ON sF VFP = Vehicle Fueling Posrtrorrs eMaximum "umber of votricles th. r cWr be iao+eu Srrmdlaeeously� hlrrte: City Administrative fee of 5% wilt he added to the total Traffir< Impact F995 CMrgod. Surface Water A- System Development Charge Single Family (Detached) per dwelling /Uf other Development per ESU j i ES U = 3200 sf of rww Pmpervious surface) 11,21 r"Scnti V 4 G: t rhTAPh r*MV& r 26-M A{}yq d iZi}r.-MW Xwp «,r)s i0 75 24AU 65 S9 1411 a 71 11 U4 1-08 5.78 18.115 24.43 8.43 21.12 5.13 N;A 326 1-SR 1.55 NIA 23.70 19.R3 1 Z 37 16.99 209.18 J.EA 14.54 12.54 31.99 5.17 11.78 13.73 518 7.97 961.00 981 00