20-101386-Compliance Matrix-09-11-2020-V1Condition Response
1. Future submittals related to this project shall contain the properties' most
current legal descriptions.
April 2020 building permit submittal: Sheet EX-01 of the civil set has an outdated
legal description. Sheet EX-01 of the civil plan set has been updated with the latest legal description.
2. The proposal was received as a general commodity warehouse with an
associated office. A future change in the type of use and/or occupancy shall require
review for compliance with applicable requirements and to determine any impacts,
including revisiting the SEPA threshold determination and Use Process III decision,
as needed.
April 2020 building permit submittal: The permit does not include a tenant;
therefore, compliance will be determined during the future tenant improvement
permit.
Comment noted. No action currently needed.
3. The building permit application plan set shall include a section on parking
analysis that demonstrates compliance with required parking ratios and consistency
with the 287 spaces proposed on the Use Process III site plan (Sheet ST-01)
April 2020 building permit submittal: The submitted Conditions of Approval
document describes 294 parking spaces, which is not what is provided on the
drawing. The 7 ADA stalls are counted within the 257-stall count, so together with
the 30 trailer stalls that totals 287 stalls. On Sheet AN-0 correct the parking analysis
to remove the note that says it assumes 10% future office and correct the sheet to
say 95% warehouse or if something else is desired for the development then
correct numbers so that everything calculates
correctly.
Refer to revised parking tabulation on sheet AN-0 indicating 95% warehouse in lieu
of 90% and added line item for the 30 trailer parking stalls with a grand total of 285
stalls.
4. Work is not allowed on Wetlands DP, DQ, DR, DT, Stream EA, and associated
buffers, as stream setback intrusions and improvements/land surface modifications
in non-CZA exempt wetland setbacks require Use Process IV application review and
approval per FWCC Sections 22-1312(c) and 22-1359(d)
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo. See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020.
5.The Use Process III ‘Existing Tree Plan’ (Sheet SR-07) shall be attached to the final
landscaping plan submitted with the building permit.
April 2020 building permit submittal: The submitted Conditions of Approval
document describes this plan as being attached to the LA Sheets, but it is not. Some
of its contents have been incorporated into Sheet TR-01, but that is not adequate
to satisfy this condition. If the contents of Sheet SR-07 are incorporated into Sheet
TR-01,
then all of it needs to be shown, at present none of the content on the pond parcel
is shown.
The Use Process III 'Exisiting Tree Plan' (Sheet SR-07) has been attached to the
landscaping plan as sheet LA-10 "Existing Tree Plan"
6. Prior to building final inspection, all additional, supplemental and replanted Type
I and II landscaping, as indicated on the Use Process III preliminary landscaping plan
(Sheet LA-01), shall be installed.
This shall be verified prior to building final inspection. Comment noted.
7. The building permit landscaping plan shall show the required six-foot width for
parking lot islands adjacent to the trash enclosure.April 2020 building permit submittal: Shown on LA sheet, condition satisfied. Comment noted.
8.All significant trees shall be retained within the Managed Forest Buffer and within
areas planned to remain undisturbed as indicated on the Use Process III
tree/vegetation retention plan and clearing and grading plan (Sheets TR-01 & GR-
01) to the maximum extent feasible.
April 2020 building permit submittal: Shown on GR and TR sheets, condition
satisfied. Comment noted.
9. Clearing/grading on the pond parcel (parcel 6142600200) shall be limited to the
areas necessary for the stormwater pond and associated stormwater conveyance
infrastructure only as shown on the Use Process IO clearing and grading plan (Sheet
GR-01).
April 2020 building permit submittal: Shown on GR sheets, condition satisfied.Comment noted.
10. The applicant shall obtain Forest Practices approval prior to issuance of a
building permit.
April 2020 building permit submittal: The submitted Conditions of Approval
document states “comment noted,” which is an inadequate response to the
condition. No FPA has been submitted.
A Forest Practices application will be submitted prior to building permit issuance.
Woodbridge Building A - Conditions of Approval
11. The following amendments shall be made to the critical area report prior to
issuance of a building permit: a)The amount of impact to the buffer of Stream EA is
inconsistent between the text in the report and on Figure WI.2 in the report.
Section 7.2.3 — Stream Buffer Averaging of the report states that 1,944 square feet
of the buffer area will be reduced, and 2,235 square feet of buffer area will be
replaced. However, Figure W1.2 shows a reduction of 1,695 square feet of stream
buffer and a replacement of 2,359 square feet. The figure and the report shall be
revised to show correct quantities of reduction and replacement.
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo. See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020. No further action needed.
11(b)According to the Buffer Averaging Plan in the report (Sheet WI.2) only the
northwest portion of the buffer of Wetland DT is being impacted. However, several
sheets in the site plan show the entire wetland buffer being reduced to 50 feet. The
report and all subsequently submitted development plans sheets shall be revised,
as necessary, to show the correct buffer impact.
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo. See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020.
11 (c)The applicant shall show/label on Figure W1.2 the size of each area of buffer
reduction and replacement to demonstrate that each reduction is compensated for
at the location of the critical area where that reduction occurs. Adjustments shall
be made if necessary.
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo. See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020. No further action needed.
12. Areas of wetland and stream buffer replacement shall be enhanced with native
vegetation, as necessary, to ensure buffer function continues post-development.
Planting details shall be shown on the landscape plan submitted with the building
permit.
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo. See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020.
13.All subsequently submitted building and engineering plans shall show averaged
critical area buffers, including buffer replacement areas, and only buffers for critical
areas that will remain after development.
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo.See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020.
14. Installation of permanent signs and split rail fencing is required at the outer
edge of the wetland buffers for Wetlands DQ, DR, and DT, and shall be completed
prior to final inspection for the building permit.
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo.See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020. No further action needed.
15.The boundary between the wetland buffers and contiguous land shall be
identified with permanent signs, which shall be a city-approved type designed for
high durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per every 150 feet and
maintained by the property owner in perpetuity.
April 2020 building permit submittal: See July 2020 ESA memo.See "Response to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August
25, 2020.
16. The city shall not issue any approvals to fill wetlands until all state, federal, or
other agency permits as may be required to fill the wetlands have been obtained
and verification provided to the city.
April 2020 building permit submittal: The submitted cover letter and Conditions of
Approval document state that the permits will be provided to the city prior to
building permit issuance.
Comment noted. Copies of the Federal and State permits will be provided to the
City upon receipt.
17.The building permit submittal shall address the following: a)Rooftop mechanical
equipment, including vents, mechanical penthouses, elevator equipment, and
similar appurtenances that extend above the roofline must be surrounded by a
solid sight-obscuring screen that meets the following criteria: (a) the screen must be
integrated into the architecture of the building; and (b) the screen must obscure
the view of the appurtenances from adjacent streets and properties.
April 2020 building permit submittal: Regarding (a), the southwestern and southern
building entry sections are shown. What about the rest of the building? Please
provide additional elevations to demonstrate compliance with the requirement.
Refer to added sheet A4.02 for site building sections for the NW and N office
corners. RTU and Equipment screen to be under a deferred submittal as part of the
future tenant improvement package.
17 (b) Type I landscaping is required around ground level mechanical and electrical
equipment and utility installations, unless precluded for safety and access reasons.
Regarding (b), landscaping is shown around the equipment outside the electrical
and fire pump rooms; component (b) of the condition is satisfied. Comment noted. No further action needed.
18. The building permit landscaping plan shall provide Type I landscaping a
minimum of five feet in width on the north and south sides of the combined
trash/recycling enclosure area.
April 2020 building permit submittal: Shown on LA sheet,
condition satisfied. Comment noted. No further action needed.
19. Prior to building permit issuance, plans shall demonstrate: 1) how occupant use
of the designated garbage/recycling areas will integrate with service access; and 2)
how the storage and collection of other garbage generated on site complies with
FWCC Section 22-949(e)(1), which states the recycling storage area and garbage
storage area shall be adjacent to each other.
April 2020 building permit submittal: The submitted Conditions of Approval
document states that this will be addressed after the first round of comments and
prior to building permit issuance.
Refer to revised sheets A2.1, A2.3 and A2.4. 1,315 sq. ft. of recycling/garbage
storage is provided. A +/- 315sq. ft. garbage/recycling enclosure is provided on the
east side of the building. (2) 500 sq. ft. speculative garbage/recycling areas are
provided on the interior. Final design will be part of a deferred submittal as part of
the future Tenant improvement package.
20. Prior to building permit issuance, plans shall demonstrate that the garbage and
recycling storage needs have been incorporated into the design and planned for in
ways that will serve occupants over time.
April 2020 building permit submittal: The submitted Conditions of Approval
document states that this will be addressed after the first round of comments and
prior to building permit issuance.
Refer to revised sheets A2.1, A2.3 and A2.4. 1,315 sq. ft. of recycling/garbage
storage is provided. A +/- 315sq. ft. garbage/recycling enclosure is provided on the
east side of the building. (2) 500 sq. ft. speculative garbage/recycling areas are
provided on the interior. Final design will be part of a deferred submittal as part of
the future Tenant improvement package.
21.Prior to issuance of a building permit, a lighting plan shall be submitted for
verification of compliance with FWCC Section 22-954(c).
April 2020 building permit submittal: Lighting plan submitted,
condition satisfied. Comment noted. No further action needed.
22. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall submit an evaluation of the
facility design by a qualified professional to ensure that the equipment to be
installed at the warehouse, as well as warehouse activities, are consistent or similar
to those identified in the noise report (“Greenline Building “A” Development,
Federal Way Washington Environmental Noise Report, Ramboll Environ, revised
March 2018). (A SEPA mitigation measure.)
April 2020 building permit submittal: The submitted Conditions of Approval
document states that the report will be completed prior to building permit
issuance.
This is a speculative warehouse with no tenant designated at this time. Warehouse
equipment and activities evaluation shall be deferred until the tenant improvement
phase.
23. The following measures shall be implemented during project construction with
quarterly reports submitted by the applicant to the city documenting compliance
starting from the issuance of the building permit and concluding at issuance of a
certificate of occupancy: a)All equipment shall be fitted with properly sized
mufflers, and if necessary, engine intake silencers.
This shall be verified during construction and at time of final building inspection
prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.Comment noted.
23(b) All equipment shall be in good working order.Comment noted.
23(c)Use quieter construction equipment models if available and whenever
possible, use pneumatic tools rather than diesel or gas-powered tools.Comment noted.
23(d)Place portable stationary equipment as far as possible from existing residential
and noise- sensitive commercial areas, and if necessary, place temporary barriers
around stationary equipment.
Comment noted.
23(e)For mobile equipment that routinely operate near residential areas (i.e.,
within approximately 200 feet to the north of the project site), consider placement
of typical fixed pure-tone backup alarms with ambient-sensing and/or broadband
backup alarms. (SEPA mitigation measures.)
Comment noted.
24.A detailed review of final operating conditions shall be completed to ensure that
the noise study accurately and conservatively reflects future project operation. A
report documenting the assessment prepared by a qualified professional shall be
submitted to the city six months after the certificate of occupancy is issued. (A SEPA
mitigation measure.)
This shall be verified six months after issuance of the certificate of
occupancy.
Comment noted. The report will be submitted within 6 months of a specific tenant
be awarded a Certificate of Occupancy.
25.If the proposed use of the building includes cold storage, processing, or
manufacturing, the air quality analysis (“Greenline Building “A” Development,
Federal Way Washington Air Quality Report”, Ramboll Environ, revised March 2018)
must be revised and SEPA threshold determination revisited prior to the building
permit issuance, or if no building permit is required, then prior to business license
issuance. (A SEPA mitigation measure.)
April 2020 building permit submittal: The permit does not include a tenant;
compliance will be determined during the future tenant
improvement permit or if no permit is required, then prior to business license
issuance.
Comment noted.
26.The following measures shall be implemented during project construction with
quarterly reports submitted by the applicant to the city documenting compliance
starting from the issuance of the building permit and concluding at issuance of the
certificate of occupancy: (a)Use only equipment and trucks that are maintained in
optimal operational condition.
This shall be verified during construction and at time of final building inspection
prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Comment noted.
26(b)Require all off road equipment to be retrofit with emission reduction
equipment (i.e., require participation in Puget Sound region Diesel Solutions by
project sponsors and contractors), including particulate matter traps and oxidation
catalysts to reduce MSATs.
Comment noted.
26(c)Use biodiesel or other lower-emission fuels for vehicles and equipment.Comment noted.
26(d)Use carpooling or other trip reduction strategies for construction workers
when possible.Comment noted.
26(e)Stage construction to minimize overall transportation system congestion and
delays to reduce regional emissions of pollutants during construction.Comment noted.
26(f)Implement restrictions on construction truck idling (e.g., limit idling to a
maximum of five minutes).Comment noted.
26(g)Locate construction equipment away from sensitive receptors such as fresh air
intakes to buildings, air conditioners, and sensitive populations.Comment noted.
26(h)Locate construction staging zones where diesel emissions won't be noticeable
to the public, or near sensitive populations such as the elderly and the young.Comment noted.
26(i)Spray exposed soil with water or other suppressant to reduce emissions of PM
and deposition of particulate matter.Comment noted.
26(j) Pave or use gravel on staging areas and roads that would be exposed for long
periods.Comment noted.
26(k)Cover all trucks transporting materials, wet materials in trucks, or provide
adequate freeboard (space from the top of the material to the top of the truck
bed), to reduce PMID emissions and deposition during transport.
Comment noted.
26(l)Provide wheel washers to remove particulate matter that would otherwise be
carried off site by vehicles to decrease deposition of particulate matter on area
roadways.
Comment noted.
26(m)Remove particulate matter deposited on paved, public roads, sidewalks, and
bicycle and pedestrian paths to reduce mud and dust; sweep and wash streets
continuously to reduce emissions.
Comment noted.
26(n)Cover dirt, gravel, and debris piles as needed to reduce dust and wind-blown
debris.Comment noted.
26(o)Route and schedule construction trucks to reduce delays to traffic during peak
travel times to reduce air quality impacts caused by a reduction in traffic speeds.
(SEPA mitigation measures.)
Comment noted.
27.Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall construct a
northbound left- turn lane on Weyerhaeuser Way South at the southerly driveway
(truck access) to provide safer and more efficient access into the site. The
northbound left-turn lane storage shall be designed to accommodate the 95th
Percentile queues length ensuring left-turn queues will not block the through traffic
lane. The channelization plan must be reviewed and approved by the city and
WSDOT. (A SEPA mitigation measure.)
Public Works The channelization plan was submitted to WSDOT on 07/31/2020 and the first
round of comments were received on 08/19/2020.
28. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall install weight limit signs on
Weyerhaeuser Way South from South 32nd Street to the project driveway, and
South 336th Street from 20th Avenue South to Weyerhaeuser Way South. (A SEPA
mitigation measure.)
Public Works Weight limit signs have been proposed. Refer to sheet PM-03 of the Channelization
and Illumination Plan, by TenW, dated August 26, 2020.
29. Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance, the applicant shall provide a fully
executed bond for 120 percent of the engineer’s estimate for design and
construction costs to upgrade the existing pavement on Weyerhaeuser Way South,
from the proposed truck entrance to South 320* Street. The bond term shall be for
a period of three years from the time of notification by applicant of full occupancy
and use of the facility, unless a shorter term is mutually agreed to in the
implementation agreement discussed below. The applicant shall provide the
engineer’s estimate.
Public Works Waiting on comments.
29.Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant and the city shall enter into an
implementation agreement to set forth the conditions by which the city will
monitor the truck trips; how the city will make its determination that the applicant
has exceeded the 28 or more truck trips per week; how notice will be provided to
the applicant; the cure period for the applicant to remedy the excess truck trips
described in the above condition; when the city will call the bond or require the
applicant to construct the implicated roadways; the bond conditions; and all other
requirements deemed necessary by the city. (A SEPA mitigation measure.)
Public Works Waiting on comments.
30.Prior to engineering plans approval, WSDOT approval of the traffic study and
channelization plans shall be provided.Public Works The channelization plan was submitted to WSDOT on 07/31/2020 and the first
round of comments were received on 08/19/2020.
31.The existing pavement on Weyerhaeuser Way South (south of the site), from the
proposed truck entrance to the SR-18 interchange must be fully reconstructed
(subgrade soils and new pavement) to accommodate the expected truck traffic
load. The applicant shall provide the pavement design for city review and approval
prior to engineering plans submittal. Once the pavement design is approved by the
city, the development shall perform full depth reconstruction of the roadway
segment impacted by the truck traffic. (A SEPA mitigation measure.)
ESM submitted a revised geotech report dated 1-30-2020 that includes the new
proposed pavement design for city review (1-31-2020). Comment noted, waiting on City comments.
32.Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall construct right-
turn storage for the westbound SR-18 off-ramp to mitigate for the impact to the
westbound off-ramp to the satisfaction and with approval of WSDOT. (A SEPA
mitigation measure.)
Public Works Waiting on comments.
33.Details on the relocated bus stops and transit related improvements shall be
shown on the engineering submittal.Public Works Waiting on comments.
34.A Right-of-Way Modification was issued on June 22, 2018, outlining required
frontage improvements for both Warehouse A and Warehouse B, with timing and
bonding requirements. The building permit site plan shall reflect the requirements
outlined in this letter. Construction plans shall be included in the building permit
submittal for review and approval.
Public Works Waiting on comments.
35.The Right-of-Way Modification issued on June 22, 2018, includes widening of
Weyerhaeuser Way South. As a part of building permit approval, water quality
treatment shall be provided for new pollution-generating surfaces within the public
right-of-way. Flow control shall also be provided. All stormwater treatment and
flow control requirements shall meet the regulations in place at the time a building
permit application is received.
No new pollution-generating impervious area is being created on Weyerhaeuser
Way S with the Warehouse A frontage improvements. Water Quality Treatment and
flow control will not be required at this time because the amount of new
impervious area being created within the public right-of-way is insufficient to meet
thresholds provided in the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Comment noted. No further action needed.
36.The applicant has discussed but not committed to any particular BMPs required
by the KCSWDM. The applicant shall incorporate BMPs into the building permit plan
set as outlined in the KCSWDM.
The TIR dated 3/20/20 submitted by ESM includes a review of all BMPs. Those that
can be successfully applied to this development include Native Growth Retention,
Soil Amendment, and Perforated Pipe Connections. The building plans are under
review and will be
required to include these BMPs.
Comment noted.
37. The applicant states that this project drains to an offsite wetland on parcel
2121049014; however. no detail has been provided concerning the wetland.
Therefore KCSWDM Chapter 3.3.5 through
3.3.7 may apply. If the amount of impervious surface area proposed by the project
is greater than or equal to 10 percent of the 100-year water surface area of a closed
depression, then a point of compliance analysis must be done to verify that the
water surface levels are not increasing for the return frequencies at which flooding
occurs, up to and including the 100-year frequency. The applicant has not provided
a comparison of the proposed impervious surface area to the surface area of the
wetland or closed depression, nor have they provided a minor floodplain analysis to
establish an assumed base flood elevation. Conservation Flow Control (Level 2)
must therefore be considered a minimum standard, and the applicant will be
required to provide additional flow control if the site’s impervious area meets or
exceeds the 10 percent threshold or a flooding problem will be created or
exacerbated. The applicant shall provide necessary documentation and mitigation
prior to building permit issuance.
The applicant has chosen to provide Level 3, Flood Control, the highest level of flow
control required, rather than providing theanalysis required by this condition. Since
mitigation for the result of the analysis would not exceed Level 3 flow control, staff
considers this condition satisfied.
Comment noted. No further action needed.
38. As stated in the KCSWDM Section 1.2.2.1, the applicant shall submit a critical
areas report for the offsite wetland on parcel 2121049014. The critical areas report
shall be completed as outlined in FWRC 19.145.080; reviewed by an outside peer
reviewer at the developer’s expense; and approved prior to approval of the final
TIR and prior to building permit issuance.
April 2020 building permit submittal: a critical areas report was provided and peer
reviewed by the city’s consultant ESA. See enclosed July 2020 memo from ESA and
address comments.
The ESA comments from the July 2020 memo have been addressed. See "Response
to ESA Comment Letter" by Talasaea Consultants, Inc, dated August 25, 2020.
39.Prior to building permit approval, WSDOT approval of the project’s impacts on
storm drainage conveyance within WSDOT right-of-way shall be provided.
The applicant states in the TIR that the storm drainage conveyance has been
submitted for WSDOT review. Prior to building permit
approval, proof of WSDOT approval must be received.
Currently awaiting WSDOT approval. Approval will be provided prior to building
permit approval.
40.The reference to the Critical Areas Report in the preliminary TIR shall be updated
to the most recent version in the final TIR.
April 2020 building permit submittal: In the updated TIR dated 3-20-2020, Sections
4 and 6 contain a reference to an August 2017 critical areas report. There is an
updated version of this critical areas report that was submitted with the building
permit.
The Critical Areas Report referenced in the final TIR will be updated to the most
recent version of the report.
41.Prior to engineering plan approval, the applicant shall record easements to allow
stormwater conveyance, treatment, and detention for Warehouse A on and across
the adjacent Warehouse B property. Easements shall be reviewed and approved by
the City of Federal Way prior to recording, and a copy shall be provided to the city
upon recording.
April 2020 building permit submittal does not address this condition. Prior to
building permit issuance, the applicant will be required to provide draft easements
which will be recorded once construction of the storm drainage system is complete.
Draft easements will be provided prior to building permit issuance.
42.Prior to issuance of a building permit, updated certificates of water and sewer
availability shall be submitted.
April 2020 building permit submittal: Updated certificates provided, condition
satisfied. Comment noted. No further action needed.
HEX 12/43 A new condition No. 12 is added to the MDNS to provide as follows: The
Applicant shall supplement its stormwater plan to demonstrate compliance and
consistency with the Executive Proposed Basin Plan Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget
Sound (King County Surface Water Management, 1991).
ESM submitted a memorandum dated 2-10-2020 (2-10-2020)
Staff provided a response memo on 4-1-2020 via email.
ESM submitted a memorandum dated 4-22-20 (4-23-20) that demonstrates project
compliance and consistency with the Executive Proposed Basin Plan Hylebos Creek
and Lower Puget Sound (King County Surface Water Management, 1991).
Condition has been deemed satisfied. No further action needed.
RR1. MDNS Condition No. 11 is replaced by the following: Cumulative traffic
impacts from Warehouse A and B and the Greenline Business Park to the SR 18
westbound ramp intersection with Weyerhaeuser Way South shall be evaluated
and mitigated in a SEPA analysis addendum and/or revision to the Warehouse A
and B TIA. PM peak hour cumulative impacts shall be included in the TIA analysis, or
added to the concurrency review for Warehouse A as the City finds most consistent
with its regulations. The City shall determine if WSDOT has jurisdiction over the SR
18 intersection. If WSDOT has jurisdiction over the SR 18 intersection, WSDOT LOS
standards shall be applied to the intersection and any necessary pro-rata mitigation
for Warehouse A shall be formulated in consultation with WSDOT as contemplated
in Conclusion of Law No. 8 of the Final Decision. If WSDOT doesn’t have jurisdiction
over the intersection, City LOS standards shall be applied and pro-rata mitigation
for Warehouse A imposed as necessary. All mitigation shall be subject to RCW
82.02.020 and constitutional nexus/proportionality.
COFW sent letter to ESM dated 12-19-19 regarding WSDOT jurisdiction, WSDOT has
jurisdiction over the SR 18 intersection and its respective LOS standards apply. ESM
submitted a memorandum dated 3-23-2020 and updated TIA for the Woodbridge
Business Park dated 3-17-2020 (4-7-2020). ESM submitted a memorandum dated 4-
7-2020 and a memo regarding pro-rata share dated 4-6-20 (4-7-2020).
Condition has been deemed satisfied. No further action needed.
MDNS Condition No. 12 is to be reclassified and re-numbered as Condition No. 43
to the Warehouse A Process III approval to reflect the fact that it is not a SEPA
mitigation measure as identified in this reconsideration decision. See Condition #43. Condition #43 has been deemed satisfied. No further action needed.