Loading...
20-101386-Correspondence-09-11-2020-V1 September 10, 2020 Job No. 1886-001-016-0015 Ms. Stacey Welsh, AICP City of Federal Way Community Development Dept. 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Permit #20-101386-CO – RESPONSE LETTER Woodbridge Building “A” – 3120 S 344th St, Federal Way Dear Ms. Welsh: ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is providing the following in response to the comment letter received on July 27, 2020. In an effort to provide concise and direct responses, we have copied the review comments below in italics and our responses are in bold. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT – PLANNING DIVISION 1. Conditions of Approval – Please address the comments in the enclosed Conditions Compliance spreadsheet. See attached Conditions Compliance matrix with responses to comments. 2. Critical Areas Reports – In addition to related items noted in the spreadsheet referenced in comment #1, please address the following comment: a) Regarding the March 2, 2020, off-site wetland report, “Existing Conditions and Drainage Study Summary,” prepared by Talasaea, the submitted critical areas report primarily references the 1994 code. The report must be revised per prior direction regarding the Campus property with regard to critical areas for parcels other than those of Woodbridge Buildings “A” and “B.” Revise the report in accordance with current code, Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapters 19.145 (“Environmentally Critical Areas”). The “Existing Conditions and Drainage Study Summary” is intended as a summary of site conditions on the triangle parcel that outlines both codes without emphasis on one or the other. The applicant acknowledges that the current FWRC is the code that is being used at this time. The graphics for Ms. Stacey Welsh September 10, 2020 Page 2 this memo were revised to address inconsistencies that were previously identified. 3. Technical Information Report – Section 4 contains a description of wetland mitigation that is no longer proposed. The description has been revised to simply reference the Critical Areas Report. 4. Civil Plans – On Sheet 4 under Site Data, remove the “253” related to parking stalls, the information is not accurate. The parking stall information has been updated. 5. Landscape Plans – Please address the following comments: a) On Sheet LA-02, cite FWCC, not FWRC, for Type I and II landscaping. Acknowledged. b) On Sheet LA-03: i. Clean up discrepancies between the three Preliminary Landscape Calculations sections between this sheet and Sheet LA-08. Also, correct the “total interior parking lot landscape area” analysis—see Section 10 of the Use Process III staff report for further detail. ii. Need landscape planter islands at the ends of all rows of parking, some are missing near the southwest corner of the sheet. It is unclear what calculations are referenced in this comment for Sheet LA- 03, since there are no calculations shown on the current construction plan set for LA-03. The total interior parking lot landscape area on Sheet LA-08 has been updated and meets the requirements of Section 10 of the Use Process III staff report. Planter islands have been added at the southwest corner resulting in 2 less standard parking stalls. The landscape and irrigation plans have been updated per this change and calculated square footage of each island has been noted on Sheet LA-03 and added to the total interior parking lot landscape area calculations. PUBLIC WORKS – DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION General 1. Add the city’s inspection notification phone number (253-835-2700), and the “One Call” utility locate number to the civil plan set. The information has been added. Ms. Stacey Welsh September 10, 2020 Page 3 2. Please review the city’s current standard general and drainage notes and correct as needed. The information has been corrected. 3. Add the city standard approval block to all civil and streetlight plans. Provide the permit number on the top of the approval block. The information has been added. 4. Call out the right of way width on all street plans. The information has been added. Storm Drainage 5. Stationing must be tied to an existing monument. Please call out the existing monument on the plans. The monument information is shown as part of the vertical datum note on sheet 2. The plans were completed in real world coordinates matching the datum information, including the stationing information. 6. The site plan key notes call out a pervious cement concrete sidewalk. Where is this used? The pervious cement concrete reference has been removed. 7. Call out where perforated pipe will be used for the conveyance system, as stated in the TIR, and as required in the KCSWDM C.2.11, as a BMP. The perforated pipe connection has been called out at the relevant locations and the detail has been added on sheet 16. 8. Show the project benchmark description, location, and elevation on each sheet where elevations are called out. On the survey, provide a tie from the temporary benchmarks to a city benchmark. The requested information has been shown on sheet 2, which should be adequate for contractor to use. Once the project surveyor adopts this information, the correct horizontal and vertical information would be staked from the remaining construction plan sheets that show elevations. 9. The stormwater control structure must be a minimum of 54-inches diameter, per KCSWDM figure 5.1.4.A. The stormwater control structure has been revised. Ms. Stacey Welsh September 10, 2020 Page 4 10. On sheet 7 of the storm drainage plan, a portion of the access road is labelled “temporary.” An access road is necessary for all structures. If there is a different permanent road planned, please show it. The access road should have bollards. The information has been updated as requested. 11. Show the public sidewalk on the drainage plans and verify that all catch basins (#1 and 2) are not within the sidewalk. The public sidewalk is shown on the frontage plans. Catch basins #1 and #2 are outside the right-of-way and should not interfere with the future public sidewalk location. Frontage Improvements /Managed Forest Buffer 12. The Managed Forest Buffer will be damaged by grading related to sidewalk installation in some areas. Installation of a small wall in lieu of grading should be considered. If grading must occur, a planting plan must be provided for disturbed areas of the Managed Forest Buffer using native plants. Native vegetation has been added in the Landscaping Plan, to any areas disturbed by grading. Additionally, the project’s forester will be present on-site during construction and make the determination in the field on how best to replant these areas. Landscape related to Civil Improvements 13. To meet BMP requirements, the plans need to specify that the top duff layer will be retained and used on all pervious disturbed areas, and the soils shall meet the following requirement from King County Code: “Areas that have been cleared and graded shall have the soil moisture holding capacity restored to that of the original undisturbed soil native to the site to the maximum extent practicable. The soil in any area that has been compacted or that has had some or all of the duff layer or underlying topsoil removed shall be amended to mitigate for lost moisture-holding capacity. The amendment shall take place between May 1 and October 1. The topsoil layer shall be a minimum of eight inches thick, unless the applicant demonstrates that a different thickness will provide conditions equivalent to the soil moisture-holding capacity native to the site. The topsoil layer shall have an organic matter content of between five to ten percent dry weight and a pH suitable for the proposed landscape plants. When feasible, subsoils below the topsoil layer should be scarified at least four inches with some incorporation of the upper material to avoid stratified layers. Compost used to achieve the required soil organic matter content must meet the definition of ‘composted materials’ in WAC 173-350-220.” Specification added to Sheet LA-08, titled Landscape Notes. Ms. Stacey Welsh September 10, 2020 Page 5 14. The bottom of the pond and its interior side slopes must be sodded or seeded. Please include the seed mix on the plan set. The hydroseed mix specification is shown on Sheet LA-08, titled Hydroseed Orchard Mix and referenced on the pond landscape sheet; LA-07. 15. Grass is required in the planter strip (street trees have been deferred). Please indicate on the plans. The note has been added to Sheet LA-04 and referenced to the specification titled Hydroseed Mix for Lawn Areas on sheet LA-08. Channelization 16. Please provide WSDOT approval of the channelization and roadway plans. The WSDOT channelization plans were submitted on 07/31/2020. Received the first round of comments from WSDOT on 08/19/2020. 17. Provide a table with a summary of all street signs. Comment incorporated as requested. Refer to sheet PM-01 of the Channelization and Illumination Plan, by TenW, dated August 26, 2020. Streetlighting 18. Show the existing and proposed J-Box locations. Comment incorporated as requested. Refer to sheet IL-01 of the Channelization and Illumination Plan, by TenW, dated August 26, 2020. 19. The streetlight poles must be in the planter strip. Mast arms must be changed out to a length that extends only to the face of curb, so that a 2-foot overhang is accomplished with the addition of a 361/4-inch luminaire. Comment incorporated as requested. The locations for streetlight poles #2-5 and #7-10 were revised. The mast arms were revised to 6-ft for these streetlight poles. Refer to sheet IL-01 of the Channelization and Illumination Plan, by TenW, dated August 26, 2020. 20. Replace all luminaires with LED lighting. Comment noted. All proposed luminaires are LED, including the existing to remain/replace luminaires, thus no revisions were made. 21. Revise the wiring schedule, as necessary. Comment noted. No necessary revisions to wiring schedule needed. Ms. Stacey Welsh September 10, 2020 Page 6 Erosion Control 22. Dimension the sediment pond depth, length, and width. The length and width have been dimensioned in plan view and the depth has been added to the table. 23. Indicate the pond storage required. The required and provided surface areas have been added. 24. Provide two section views of the pond and outlet structure. The section views have been added. 25. Add a note to the silt fence detail to require .02 permittivity and native backfill. The notes have been added and the material has been revised. Technical Information Report 26. The TIR has established that the downstream wetland on parcel #2121049014 is not anticipated to suffer damage from flooding as a result of this development, since level 3 flow control is being provided. The applicant must also establish that the total volume of water into the wetland during a single precipitation event will not be more than 20 percent higher or lower than the pre-project volumes, and that the total volume of water into the wetland on a monthly basis will not be more than 15 percent higher or lower than the pre-project volumes. See Guide Sheet 3B, Reference 5 in the KCSWDM. The area tributary to parcel #2121049014 has been delineated on a map and is included with the hydrologic analysis in the Appendix of the TIR. The wetland recharge analysis shows the relative change in the inflow volume to the wetland during a single day (on average) and a single month (on average) and both scenarios are within their respective thresholds of 20 percent and 15 percent of the pre-project volumes; therefore, the proposed development is in compliance with this wetland hydration requirement. 27. The TIR addendum (an April 22, 2020, memorandum), demonstrates project compliance and consistency with the Executive Proposed Basin Plan Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound (King County Surface Water Management, 1991); this shall be added to the TIR. The TIR Addendum (Memorandum dated April 22, 2020) has been added to the appendix of the TIR. Ms. Stacey Welsh September 10, 2020 Page 7 PUBLIC WORKS – TRAFFIC DIVISION 28. Comments are deferred until the outstanding transportation items noted in the applicant’s Response to Conditions of Approval Letter are submitted. This comment has been noted. If there are any questions or a need for further clarification, please feel free to contact me at (253) 838-6113 and I would be happy to discuss them with you. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC. LAURA BARTENHAGEN, P.E., LEED AP Principal \\esm8\engr\esm-jobs\1886\001\016-0015\document\letter-019.docx