Loading...
90-100078O 70 — D D O C to cn v vr v < v cn r to 2 W 3 C > z� m n n v 0 0 m0 OC r r 2 0 D D M> m C D m > U) z< D a n z (n x m z m v c m n m n m a > x z a g= m 3 W a m m D o m o 2 J m T m z m >0 T> 2 2 m< v C� D n m n m . C D = O m m c m r- m G) v < c O m m Z m Z m zi�zz�0 Gm) m� mmmZ<Mm >m0m m m D z 2 N n G 0 m m m m m m m U) m U' m Z m i 0 �p o m z " �� m T m O � '� to y o j m Z I Coll FM�O! r r" ^' �1 T� m O ;b N Co -n O � c !N iD • N Z LTJ U7 c z 0 m p � 00 Cd bCl < N N �P -1 N 01 W W Ln a O Z T �O AP Ob oo �1 Ln Ln I� W 00 v � 70 c D r c m m 00 U1 v m m 70 . o . u, . u� . . . o 0 o O to D r p z z> z z 0_ 0 n c Z F� N v N O O 000 O • x O"< O D W� z D O m D D { ov Qm z m c0 z z m O v 0o m v_ m UD L, �t z cn x m v m z m m M z 0 I i W y m fA z D -1 0 g H z o O L z ❑ c m X z O Lyl z N H b •• r M H C6rn G H .. m G) D v D o Cb 2 7D p z O D o p n m m m m m W k n >7 = z m 2 m D v n x v m Om n n W Ci -4 - N O m >1� m v D m m z n O m C — cn O Ul 7i °m m°DT° �Dza zom;' 2> c m D n 70 z = n r H❑ W ZED O d cn Z ` m m n z O T o y O o —VN � 70 v LA o �' 0 0 I n 3 z cn z0 vvv n z H H m r- m �o m Ov � 'n o m to m 0 m n Z v v n m D z n = LD in Hm v r n D m 2 rb t nw m Z m m m o m o a)0W D m a M� D v 1 O W '� Ul z m N W n mn r z -" O W W M a a v vi m - 3 n+ 70 74 o tr y � D x m z Om T T 0 m = y m z r my T D K 37 m z c 31 m W O r� p W c = Fn N cc z m m zo m °r° Cn z ;n D 1 m m m v N U'1 n Cm N D z m v W LHTJ Ln 11'I C Oln C: Ln G1 l � � d 0 H vv O O ou C r v 4 Q C d m ic co Z Z N1 CO) N n Z L C" CITY OF FEDERAL WAY U4'`� ,,�'�� L BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION — Please Print BOX 1 OWNERL�rz-4' JOB LOCATION_ S`51 � t i �`` E'L s• cel e r.��Y _ _T OWNER'S ADDRESS_ 3"3 ti. L- u_Q �Z3 ►-� G7 ClTY.7n c� �N~ PHONE DESCRIBE JOB i4snILq(� THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY: SINGLE/MARRIED PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION BOX 2 CONTRACTOR'S NAME CONTRACTOR'S REG. # geyj";zni Sl 1 it Card MUST be presented CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS ,i CITY �-� PHONE EXPIRATION DATE -OR- I HAVE READ CHAPTER 18.27.010 RELATING TO DEFINITIONS OF GENERAL CONTRACTORS AND SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS AND CHAPTER 18.27.110 WHICH PROHIBITS ISSUING PERMITS WITHOUT PROOF OF REGISTRATION. BOX 3 CONTACT PERSON PHONE BOX 4 SEWER DISTRICT -:5.L p er' WATER DISTRICT f=_L� �a7 BOX 5 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST EXISTING BUILDING VALUATION '�-- BOX 6 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 5_ 32SAI Z3 - 17 -?%2 -,:2+ LEGAL DESCRIPTION [ -r i?- - 1 -?IA pp',6w A 'Me,& ►�� ��� - (If necessary, please submit a separate page with the legal description.) BOX 7 BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: (Existing/Proposed) 1ST FLOOR / 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR / BASEMENT / DECK 1 GARAGE /� BOX 8 ( SINGLE FAMILY ( W- EW CONSTRUCTION ( ) MULTIFAMILY (NO. OF UNITS = } ( ) EXISTING STRUCTURE ( ) COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL TOTAL AREA OF PROPERTY SQ FT BOX 9 PLUMBING FIXTURES (including rough -ins) MECHANICAL APPLIANCES - BASIC FEE $ ¢ N0.WATERCLOSETS GAS PIPING, FEETZ $ BATHTUBS NO. FURNACE, ELEC. GAS $ I SHOWERS _GAS HOT WATER HEATER $� 4 LAVATORIES CONVERSION BURNER $ _SINKS BOILER, SIZE BTU $ I DISHWASHERS AIR HANDLING UNITS $ ELECTRIC HOT WATER HEATER HEAT PUMPS, SIZE $ 1 LAUNDRY WASHER OUTLET UNIT HEATERS $ URINALS AIR COOLING UNITS, SIZE $ DRINKING FOUNTAINS `COMMERCIAL HOOD $ SUMPS, SPRINKLER VACUUM BREAKERS OTHER -. $ DRAINS _ -- $ OTHER! 143- - - U p TOTAL MECHANICAL FEE $ �. TOT L FIXTURES $ S -_� S �•� I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY ME IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND FURTHER THAT I AM AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER OF THE ABOVE PREMISES TO PER- FORM THE WORK FOR APPLICATION IS MADE. OWNER/AGENT DATE: ANP -006 2/90 OFFICE USE ONLY (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE) ZONE i'� S 7- SETBACKS: FRONT -2-0 SIZE S f-r4c_ (REAR HEIGHT LIMIT O PLANTING DEPARTMErt APPROVAL . Cr 5 - Z — rf0 REMARKS: �4 - � � ter, T) ,ctiaX L oT [.ed V e.(_0v C o f qV r I c- o S r -q I f �c �t l r„ SEPA: EXEMPT X NOT EXEMPT v FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DATE REMARKS:, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DATE_3 REMARKS: TYPE OF JOB: NEW RESIDENCE RES. ADD/ALT NEW INDUSTRIAL_ IND. ADD/ALT NEW COMMERCIAL COMM' ADD/ALT NEW MULTIFAMILY (UNITS ) MULTIFAMILY ADD/ALT TENANT IMP. ROOF OTHER OCCUPANCY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION �_I4) STORES Li vi K9^. BUILDING SQ. FT. q62 @ BUILDING SQ. FT. Cf q @ f - C -j $ /6 • Zo BUILDING SQ. FT. @ _ BUILDING SQ. FT. @ _ BUILDING SQ. FT. @ BUILDING SQ. FT. @ . TOTAL SQ. FT. TOTAL VALUATION 1 Z -SO 7 6 • If EBUILDING PER IT NO. PERMIT FEE 31- 6 S� PLAN CHECK FEE TOTAL FEES ! Z - b q • -© SBCC SURCHARGE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL ----- REMARKS I0xN91v/a11 PLAN CHECK FEE RECD - RECEIPT NO. _ 1..�-�-�c�, PLUMBING FEE —-- MECH. FEE ' a __ ENERGY SURCHARGE - AMOUNT DUE z- Gj -- ..__— — — — — — — — — — — — — -- DATE 353 L ASSIGNED ADDRESS: _35-f 33 1 f f" loe, _511 we, ACCEPTED FOR FILING Whitacre Engineers, Inc. r__ J"-A� Consulting Engineering & Land Planning V41%TJ April 13, 1990 728 PACIFIC AVENUE, SUITE 100 P.O. BOX 5677 • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98405-0677 ■ (206) 272-5144 RECEIVED APR 17 1990 Pichette Construction C?TYDFFEIDERALWgy 7901 4 9th Avenue East 9�i�.�]iNG OEpT Tacoma, Washington 98443 Attention: Pat Pichette Reference: Foundation Inspection at 35121 11th Place S.W. Federal Way, Washington Dear Mr. Pichette: As requested, at 9:15 A.M. on April 13, 1990, I inspected the spread footings on Lots 122, 123, 124, 125 and 127 in the Madronna Meadows addition at the above address. The inspection was requested in response to the City of Federal Way's concern relative to the honey combing of the spread footings. The spread footings were designed to be 18 inches wide and 8 inches deep with a stem 18 inches high and 8 inches thick. The spread footings had been poured on the above lots and vary in thickness from 8 inches thick to 12 inches thick. The extra concrete thickness is to compensate for any variance in the ground surface. All of the footings bear on undisturbed natural soil and not on structural fill. The concern arose when the forms were removed, some honey combing in the concrete appeared. The question of structural integrity was asked. I have reviewed the foundations, the loads that will be applied from the structure, and performed soil bearing calculations. I am satisfied the foundations will carry all the intended load both present and future. In fact,"theoretically," in the situation at this site a spread footing would not be required (I do not recommend this). In conclusion, it is my professional opinion the footings as I reported are satisfactory to proceed with further work without any corrective measures. Pichette Construction Page 2 April 13, 1990 Please call if you have any questions. WET/ed cc: City of Federal Way Matt Bodhaine FAX # 839-2496 Very truly yours, WHITACRE ENGINEERS, I Wesley E. Taft, P.E. Pre s idem-+►�.,` �S'pF�15TE��•�� ��1, o - > o m » @ > G R 2 G > cn ® > % n ® r, $ ) / / ¥) \ § m ¥ r § 9 Co t t ®n = _ ® o ® t c ® z ® z Z z 6 ) 6 _ w>_ C Z� \ § A t» 3§ = m / 2®)§ E m c§ n=__ m m> » n m= ; _ w - z i � ' m ' m � z = j > = o 2== o z o ; o= 0 o=> m o z m -n m o m_® m y o § e o m m m o z = m Cl) o@ ® _)@ 9 a o C: Q m§ 2 r@# 9 m 2 ® C K Q z z i 0� m M ° � ` M k� m m m m ) z A%{ z k w] P m ® ¥ p§ 0 $ rn ° mk § c0 ]} a .. U . j j \ ) k \ { z ` c f = _ z 3 ° \ z § } 2 § � w \ o n ~ y z § % 2 > m § § 2 ) ƒ m 9 e » = e m z ) $ m > m » M § 2 @ § > \ § 5 ° ( a c A z = z» m M, m o / § ® % z m o 0 > > F m = n o mo o o ■ a \ \ 2 z 4 19 z o> o o> m « m « o m » m m - m/}( f\ i m k % / Q > 2& o$ 5 K \ a ) o m ( § \ \ \ > ( ( z \ ( ) § CO 2 % » \ Z m m » _ = z 2 = o = > m» r z a> § 2 m ) E c Q% a ® E R m z / k \ § «v z E z § > ) k \ > ) ( o m 4 m Q k0 ( n / I`* = _ m § f e / / § / § > ) ] 2 m m ( $ > z ) > ? a m > e > m $ z = z _ 2 m 5 z= k / a # ® z > > § k § m » ( g m § a j T \ zG) ( j0 m ° » z i \ f \ T- o m § = q c= K R m 2 0 r 2 p \ ( > S z m m ] a m r z § G \ A ( § k m m � � MEL � _C � D co Z L . _ z N CO) ul'a m � O Z