Loading...
Council MIN 06-22-1993 Special FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION/CITY-WIDE CAPITAL FACILITIES FORUM Sherwood Forest Elementary School June 22, 1993 MINUfES I. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION Mayor Stead welcomed guests and opened the forum at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at Sherwood Forest Elementary School, Federal Way, Washington. Councilmembers Present: Mayor Bob Stead, Deputy Mayor Joel Marks, Council members Ray Tomlinson, Mary Gates, Ron Gintz, Skip Priest. Absent: Council member Lynn Templeton. II. PRESENTATIONS Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a memorandum from City Manager McFall dated July 1, 1993, which summaries the levels of services discussed during the forum. The forum ended at 9:55 a.m.. );L,~~ IÞ-- Deputy City Clerk ORIGINAL ~ City of Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: July I, 1993 To: Mayor Stead & City Council From: J. Brent McFall, City Manager Subject: City Facilities Plan Fomm The CFP forum held on June 22 at Sherwood Forest Elementary School was attended by nearly 70 elected officials, board and commission members, and citizens of Federal Way. Small groups ranging in size from six to ten people discussed levels of service for parks and transportation and revenue strategies for funding needed improvements. Each group gave a brief report on their discussions and recommendations on levels of service and funding strategy. The following is a summary of those small group results with a recommendation to council for level of service and funding sources for purposes of analysis only through the environmental impact statement, which is now being prepared for the City's comprehensive plan process. Levels of Service Parks The worksheet used for the forum classified parks into community/neighborhood, linear/open space, and special facilities. A level of service was set for each park type as well as an overall level of service for park facilities. The following is"a summary of the range of level of service by park type and for total parks developed by the small groups. Community/Neighborhood Range - 2.8 to 9 acres per 1,000 population Average - 4.5 acres per 1,000 population Median - 4 acres per 1,000 population Mode - 4 acres per 1,000 population Linear/Open Space Range - 3 to 9 acres per 1,000 population Average - 5.25 acres per 1,000 population Median - 5 acres per 1,000 population Mode - 5 acres per 1,000 population EXHI"i' ...!l. Mayor Stead & City Council July 1 1993 Pa!!e 2 Special Facilities Range - 0 to 2.5 acres per 1,000 population Average - 1.2 acres per 1,000 population Median - 1 acre per 1,000 population Mode - 1 acre per 1,000 population Total Darks Range - 5.8 to 20.5 acres per 1,000 population Average - 10.9 acres per 1,000 population Median - II acres per 1,000 population Mode - 10 & 11.5 acres per 1,000 (both occur twice) Transportation The worksheet used a level of service in terms of congestion. Congestion was expressed as a percentage of increased congestion over and above existing conditions. The following is a summary of the transportation level of service results from the small groups. Range - 50% to 93 % additional congestion Average - 71 % additional congestion Median - 61 % additional congestion Mode - 61 % additional congestion Revenue Options The worksheet included several alternative sources of revenue available to the City to finance needed capital projects. Those sources included property tax, utility tax, impact fees, street utility, voter approved bonds, and a business and occupation tax. The following is a summary by revenue type. Property tax Range - maintain existing levy to 2.5 % annual increase in levy rate Average - 1.7% annual levy rate increase Median - 2 % annual levy rate increase Mode - 2 % annual levy rate increase Bond issue Range - $2 - $10 million annual bond issue Average - $5.6 million annual bond issue Median - $5 million annual bond issue Mode - $5 million annual bond issue Utility tax Range - 0% to 6% tax rate Average - 3% tax rate Median - 3% tax rate Mode - 2.5 % & 3 % tax rate (both occur twice) 2 Mayor Stead & City Council July I. 1993 Pae:e 3 Street utility Range - $0 to $24 annual charge per household or employee Average - $10.5 annual charge Median - $12 annual charge Mode - $12 annual charge Business & Occupation tax None of the groups used this revenue source. Impact fees - transportation Range - $0 to $3,000 charge per new dwelling unit Average - $1,750 charge per new dwelling unit Median - $2,000 charge per new dwelling unit Mode - $2,000 charge per new dwelling unit Impact fees - parks Range - $0 to $1,500 charge per new dwelling unit Average - $750 charge per new dwelling unit Median - $500 charge per new dwelling unit Mode - $1,500 per new dwelling unit Conclusions and Recommendations Despite some wide variation on ranges in some areas, there are some consistent results from the CFP forum. Levels of service for parks and transportation were consistent enough to draw some conclusions regarding parks and transportation facilities. In terms of the revenue options, some very clear results were gathered. No group proposed implementing a business and occupation tax, while most groups favored the other revenue strategies to a greater or lesser degree. Most groups favored a tax on utilities, slight increases in property taxes, and bond levies. All but two groups favored a street utility and all but one group indicated that impact fees for new development should be used to construct parks and transportation facilities. As noted earlier in this report, levels of service and revenue strategy direction is being sought for use in the analysis being performed in the CityShape environmental impact statement. This information will be used to evaluate the impact of the different land use scenarios on these facilities. The following are the recommended levels of service and revenue strategies for use in the EIS analysis: 3 Mayor Stead & City Council July I 1993 Page 4 Levels of Service - Parks Community/Neighborhood parks Linear parks/Open Space Special Facilities Total parks - 4.5 acres per 1,000 population - 5.25 acres per 1,000 population - l. 25 acres per 1,000 population - 11 acres per 1,000 population Level of Service - Transportation Level of additional congestion - 61 % (34 new arterial lane miles) Revenue Sources Annual bond issue Property tax Utility tax Street utility Impact fees - parks - $750 per new dwelling unit transportation - $1,750 per new dwelling unit - $5 million - 2 % annual increase in levy rate - 3 % rate - $12 per household/employee per year jbm\m220.jah 4