Loading...
Council MIN 01-07-1993 Special FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PLANNING SESSION January 7, 1993 SUMMARY Mayor Stead opened the planning session of the Federal Way City Council at the hour of 1:20 p.m., in Council Chambers, City Hall, Federal Way, Washington. Councilmembers Present: Mayor Bob Stead, Deputy Mayor Joel Marks, Councilmembers Ray Tomlinson, Mary Gates, Ron Gintz, Lynn Templeton, Skip Priest. City Staff Present: City Manager J. Brent McFall, Assistant City Managers Steve A.nderson and Ken Nyberg, Finance Director Deborah Larson, Parks Director Joe Stevens, Public Works Director Philip Keightley, Long Range Planning Manager Larry Springer, City Attorney Carolyn Lake, Management Assistant Dena Laurent, Deputy City Clerk Chris Green. Mr. McFall introduced newly appointed Federal Way Fire District Administrator Jim Hamilton. Mr. McFall, acting facilitator, announced the agenda includes a review of goals and future vision for the city. Mayor Stead invited Council members to discuss staffing problems and concerns. Gates: Staff responding "not my job" Templeton: Becoming side-tracked, however, more Council than staff Marks: Staff should treat purchases as their own to help economize Tomlinson: Being able to locate appropriate staff when needed Priest: Tired of staff being in meetings and unavailable Stead: Unable to locate City Manager and other staff via telephone Priest: Citizens seem happy with personal contact with staff--phone contacts are a problem Gintz: Feels staff should be as accessible to citizens as to Council Tomlinson: Staff should advise all Councilmembers of same issue at same time Templeton: Suggested Councilmembers have city e-mail available at work and home locations ORIGINAL Priest: Need to improve communications between Council and staff prior to actual meeting presentations--reduce length of presentations to make more effective use of regular meetings; also stick to key presentations--make brief with brief response to Council questions--get to point ASAP Gates: Councilmembers need to ask appropriate questions up front and prior to meeting Priest: Doesn't like memo distributed day of or time of meeting Springer: Briefly discussed city marketing Stead: Said city needs vision first, then provide for wanted services Priest: Wants city made attractive to businesses Stead: City needs balance Priest: Needs must be attainable Stead: Does city want good development--decide method of obtaining--provide proper zoning-- must decide if want quality Priest: Need innovation and creativity to develop city Templeton: Need to look at future and provide ahead to see affect on city and appearance Tomlinson: City doesn't draw people from Seattle and Tacoma Gintz: Wants to annex Weyerhaeuser for international trade reflection on city--need light industrial not just white-collar Priest: Need rail Springer: Proposed economic development reflects light manufacturing and industry--will be presenting next six weeks Marks: Need to identify areas and make property available Springer: Economics and marketing will identify large areas of availability Gates: Need to make community interesting to keep children in community as future adults Stead: Wants city to be business-friendly, as well as preserving residential areas -2- Gintz: Wants development throughout city Priest: Wants to give citizens a choice Springer: Three types of economics identified at earlier housing fair: (1) retail center; (2) office and manufacturing added; (3) 200,000 sq ft building added per year Mayor Stead announced a recess at 3:00 p.m., and reconvened the session at 3:25 p.m.. Mayor Stead called on staff to identify their concerns and problem areas with Council. Keightley: Expressed awkwardness of pin-pointing problem areas to Council McFall: Explained Council is policy-making body and he is hired to deal with personnel and administration--makes it difficult when Council steps over the line--creates difficulty for problem solving Marks: Need to define line Anderson: Councilmembers need to understand all requests should go through department heads--there should be no rank and file reports unless authorized; Council tends to intimidate staff Stevens: Councilmember phone requests directed to rank and file also a problem McFall: Council requests to directors are okay, but any work projects must be approved by him Stevens: Appreciated guidelines during budget process Lake: Projects need to be done through City Manager, so not repeated by other staff Tomlinson: When Council member requests information, wants staff to respond immediately-- doesn't want to wait for answer Anderson: Okay for Council to ask simple answer questions (i.e., cost of licenses, permits) of staff if don't intimidate staff in process--no research questions Stevens: Is concerned Council may get wrong information from staff Lake: Need to keep Council requests at top, so answers correct without wasted staff time Nyberg: Is concerned that Council feels staff is involved in too many meetings--he explained managers and other staff must be involved in continual contact with others--that is their job -3- Keightley: Don't always have time or staff to answer Council questions immediately; also afraid to answer as get bad press Tomlinson: Staff needs to tell Council if there is a problem--lay it on the line McFall: Staff needs mutual respect; Council should discuss staff problems with him, not in public Priest: Okay for staff to answer Council requests next day, etc--no need to drop current project to respond immediately Stead: Necessary to know and understand fine line between policy and administration--need open communication McFall: Agreed Templeton: Has seen staff upset many times--he's glad Keightley spoke up in public--difference between personnel issues (staff to staff)--too many personnel issues go public--shouldn't be for publication--unfair to all; McFall has previously talked with him in private and not in front of whole Council if there is a problem with him personally Priest: Too many times haven't received timely information for Council meetings--if information isn't included with complete packet, should be pulled off agenda; Council must receive all information to allow for timely review and inquiry if necessary; Council wouldn't ask stupid questions in public if made aware of items prior to meetings Keightley: Teamwork is needed--staff needs to know what each Councilmember wants and needs Lake: Answers can't be given to only one Councilmember--entire Council must be made aware Priest: Feels Council should be able to ask individual questions Stead: Prefers staff has Council pull off agenda if can't answer questions at time--better to get back with correct answers later Priest: Staff should get information to Council early, so Council can ask staff for information if necessary--staff must force Council to decide Lake: Council needs to be aware of turn-a-round times for staff response--need to be key issues Stead: Council may have seven different questions and staff needs to respond to all seven--may need to research seven different issues if multi-questions--if all seven issues can't be researched and answered in timely manner, entire item should be pulled off agenda -4- Anderson: Asked for clarification--if staff can't respond to all questions, the entire item should be pulled from agenda? Stead: "Yes" Marks: Hopes staff treats all Councilmembers with equal attention McFall: Staff is committed to responding to all Council members with equal attention--staff must understand one Councilmember can't make decision or direct staff--need all seven members Stead: If two Councilmembers want to propose a draft ordinance, who do they approach Priest: Council is problem solvers, not identifiers--when important issues surface, staff should put on future agenda after staff has had time to research completely Gintz: Appreciates Keightley's honesty--invited all other staff present to identify any problems Anderson: Management is running City on shoestring budget and staff--doing best possible job McFall: Can't fix everything now--don't have the resources Stevens: Due to timeline, it is impossible to get everything to staff all the time--staff will do best under the circumstances--he doesn't appreciate not being made aware of problems Templeton: During pre-incorporation Council thought it could do all--then first year put major issues and necessities in place--snowballing now and can't do everything Gates: Council may want to look at what is a sensible timeline and normal projects--no longer functioning alone--need to chart needs and staff--too many directions--need to set guidelines Stead: Wants staff to give Council deadlines and stick to it--need to be optimistic Stevens: One major problem is the Jr Hi #6 project time frame Priest: Council can't always judge tracking time and the correct funding--need to understand potential problems and results Stead: Council and staff are all on same team--will make mistakes and waste money--only normal Templeton: City Manager's Office needs to be honest and tell Council what they can and can't do Marks: Agrees with Templeton--not always possible--must tell Council they can't do it -5- Nyberg: One problem--hired problem solvers who don't know when to stop--it's against staffs personal code Templeton: Council in same position--can't always satisfy citizens either and need to realize it Stead: Staff should never say "no" to Council--staff should look into it and then respond Priest: Need to prioritize projects Keightley: Appreciates dialog--need to know how to divide policy vs. administration--need to get on with jobs--Council needs to prioritize and give proper information to staff to allow them to proceed with projects efficiently and move forward Gintz: Council still has oversight response--he is always concerned about expenditures--feels he should be able to ask for explanation and not be ignored--doesn't like "ballpark" figures-- expects good and accurate numbers McFall: City staff just as concerned about costs--certain staff have expertise in certain areas to assist Council Tomlinson: If Council questions costs, feels should be able to ask staff to review for best price McFall: Staff will ask for best rate--if accept project, can't pick apart everything or project will never get done--is policy vs. administration Stead: Prefers variety of options, so Council can accept portion or entire project and know cost Priest: Asked if Council can go out and research better prices on purchases to save money--need to trust staff or ask in positive and honest manner; Council tends to put staff in defensive position to rebel--Council needs to aid staff when possible; staff needs to be allowed to compare apples to apples--staff and Council need to work together for best results and prices Keightley & McFall: Can vary and minimize initial costs, but might save maintenance costs down the road with better equipment or better quality at beginning Stevens: Explained field costs, Le., price vs. maintenance Gates: Council doesn't know or appreciate fact that everything possible has already been researched by staff--information will help Council respond to press and citizens more effectively Stead: Feels this interaction between Council and staff has been beneficial, but need to schedule another session for goal setting and review -6- Priest: Wants to discuss 348th Street and airport issues at this time; surface water and set up informal group of Council/staff/retail/homeowners to discuss 348th Street infrastructure for freeway access--Council can be proactive in area--need to look at long term; he offered to chair group Stead: Suggested Priest, McFall and he coordinate and place on January 19th regular meeting agenda and not take staff time at this point; he thanked Council and staff for their interpretations of problem areas--felt time spent was beneficial to all; Council needs to set level of service now; needs to be proactive; he suggested Councilmembers check their calendars and have Jann arrange a date for next planning session--he prefers a Saturday--possibly the 16th; also decide if use an outside facilitator or City Manager Springer: Need to set out goals and alternatives for CityShape and to challenge Council Priest: Would like to see proactive treatment of airport and 348th Street issues--need to decide on smaller vs. larger projects Stead: Need to set short and long-term goals Stead & Priest: Six-year TIP example of bad project Keightley: Need Council to set ground rules for CityShape and CIP Council and staff continued discussion of 348th Street exit off 1-5 Mayor Stead adjourned the session at the hour of 5:52 p.m.. >;.~~ N. Christine Green Deputy City Clerk -7-