Council PKT 10-16-2001 Special/Study Session/Regular
City of Federal Way
City Council Meeting
AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBERS
Mike Park, Mayor
Jeanne Burbidge Michael Hellickson
Eric Faison Linda Kochmar
Mary Gates Dean McColgan
CITY MANAGER
David H. Moseley
Office of the City Clerk
October 16, 2001
I.
II.
III.
I.
II.
III.
IV.
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
October 16, 2001
(www.cifederal.way.wa.",)
*****
SPECIAL/STUDY SESSION - 6:00 p.m.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
BIENNIAL BUDGET ADmSTMENTS
Presented to City Council
ADJOURNMENT
*****
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Girl Scout Troop # 1937
PRESENTATIONS
a.
b.
City ManagerlIntroduction of New Employees
City ManagerÆmerging Issues
CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING.
Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the
podium, adjust the microphone to proper height, and state your namefor the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR
REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUJES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long,
relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate.
over please. . .
V.
a.
b
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
J.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
a.
b.
c.
XI.
CONSENT AGENDA
(Items listed be/ow have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought
before full Council for approval; all items will be enacted by one motion; individual items may be removed
by a Councilmember for separale discussion and subsequent motion.)
Minutes/October 2 200 I Regular Meeting
Vouchers
Monthlv Financial Report/August 200 I
Tourism Enhancement Grant Award
Lodging Tax Advisory CommitteelReappointments
Preliminary Plat of Tuscanv/ Resolution
Preliminary Plat of Cottages at Hoyt Road/Resolution
Letter to King County/Proposed Reductions to Human Services Program
Heritage Woods Park Plav Structure
Sacajawea Field Lights
PUBLIC HEARING
Biennial Budget Adjustments & Property Tax Rate (preliminary hearing)
Citizen Comment (please limit your remarks to three (3) minutes)
INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE
Council Bill #284/2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
AN ORDINANCE OF 1BE CITY COUNCIL OF 1BE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
W ASlllNGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO 1BE CITY'S GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING
AMENDMENTS TO 1BE CITY'S ZONING MAP.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Collective BargaininglPursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(a)
Potential LitigationIPursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) .
Propertv AcquisitionIPursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)
ADJOURNMENT
.. THECOUNClL MAY ADD AND TAKEACTlONONOTHERITEMS NOT LISTED ON THEAGENDA ..
THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND
ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW-FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LffiRARY"
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
ITEM# ~')
.-.-.---.-.-- . -. --.-.--------.---.-.--.--.--.-.---.-.---.-.--.---.-.-.
-.---.-------.--.-----.---------------
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
CATEGORY:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
BUDGET IMPACT:
~ CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
-..---.--.-----------.--.----------.-----.-.--.-.
.-.-.--.--------------.------.---------.--.--.---------.--.---.---.-----.....-.---.-.
ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the regular City Council meeting held on October 2,2001.
..-.-----------------.----.-.-.-.--.-.--------..-.--.--.----------------.-.-.
.. --.-.--.-.-..----.-.-.--------.-----------.--.-.- --.-.--------.------------.---------
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW
requirements.
-.-.-------..---.---.-.-------.-.--.-.-----------.----.-.-. .-.-.---------.-------.--------..-------.--.-.-----.--.---.----.--
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a
------.-.-.-.--.-.-.-.--.--.------ -.- -.-.---.-------.-------.---.--.--.--.--.-.-.-.-------------------.-.-.-.--------------------
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on October 2,2001".
~;;~.;:~:~~;. A~;;~~:~~---_._.__._----_.._-------------_._---------------
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED-O5/10/2001
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
Council Chambers - City Hall
October 2,2001 - 7:00 p.m.
Q~þ.~~
Minutes
*****
I.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Park called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the
hour of7:03 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Mike Park, Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar,
Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Mary Gates, Eric Faison, and Dean McColgan.
Mayor Park excused Councilmember Hellickson's absence.
Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Bob Sterbank, City Clerk
Chris Green, and Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney.
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember McColgan led the flag salute.
III.
PRESENTATIONS
a.
"Fallen Hero's Day" Proclamation
Deputy Mayor Kochmar read and presented the proclamation to Federal Way Fire Chief
AI Church. This proclamation declares October 6th as "Fallen Hero's Day" with Federal
Way's recognition of the fallen firefighters and police officers on September 11, 2001.
Chief Church accepted the proclamation and thanked Council, noting there would be a
procession of fire engines and police vehicles starting at Celebration Park to the SeaTac
Mall on Saturday, October 6th.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting
October 2, 2001 - Page 2
b.
"National DECA Week" Proclamation
Deputy Mayor Kochmar read and presented the proclamation to Youth Commissioner
and President of the Federal Way High School DECA Chapter David Lock on behalf of
National DECA Week. Mr. Lock accepted the proclamation, thanking Council for the
recognition.
c.
City ManagerlIntroduction of New Emolovees
City Manager David Moseley announced the following new employees: Sean Gotcher,
Police Officer for the Public Safety Department, and Terrina Marchant as an Accounting
Technician for Management Services Department.
d.
City Mana\!erÆmerging Issues
City Manager David Moseley announced there were no emerging issues tonight.
IV.
CITIZEN COMMENT
Glen Lee, spoke in support of Consent Item (d)/Brigadoon 2001 Neighborhood Traffic
Safety Project.
Geor\!e R. Raffle, spoke in concern of the timeline of the solid waste contract for the city.
V.
CONSENT AGENDA
a.
b.
MinutesiSeotember 18 2001 Rell:Ular Meeting -Approved
Council Bill #283/Park Regulations Code Amendment!
Enactment Ordinance -Approved Ordinance #01-404
2002 Asohalt Overlav Pro\!ram Preliminary Project List & Authorization
to Bid-Approved
Brigadoon 2001 Neighborhood Traffic Safety Proiect -Approved
Federal Wav School District 2001-02 Facilities Plan & Imoact Fees
Update -Approved
Intent to Designate Residential Targeted Area for Limited Multi-Family
Tax Exemotion & to Set Public Hearin\! Date/Resolution -Approved
Resolution #01-347
c.
d.
e.
f
DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT
AGENDA AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER FAISON SECOND.
Federal Way CUy Council Regular Meeting
October 2,2001 - Page 3
Councilmember McColgan pulled Consent Item (e )/Intent to Designate Residential
Targeted Area for Limited Multi-Family Tax Exemption & to Set Public Hearing Date.
Councilmember Burbidge pulled Consent Item (d)/Brigadoon 2001 Neighborhood Traffic
Safety Project.
The main motion to approve Consent Items (a), (b), (c), and (f) passed as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Faison
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
absent
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
Consent Item (d)/Brigadoon 2001 Neighborhood Traffic Safety Project:
COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEM
(d)/BRIGADOON 2001 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT TO
INSTALL FOUR (4) SPEED HUMPS ON 35TH AVE SW BETWEEN SW 340TH
STREET AND SW 333RD STREET; COUNCILMEMBER MCCOLGAN SECOND.
Councilmembers concurred this was a very important safety issue and would be
supporting the item.
The motion to approve Consent Item (d) passed as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Faison
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
absent
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
Consent Item (e)/Intent to Designate Residential Targeted Area for Limited Multi-Family
Tax Exemption & to Set Public Hearing Date/Resolution. Approved Resolution #01-347
Councilmember McColgan expressed his concern in allowing such tax exemptions, and
encouraged citizens to attend the public hearing.
Councilmember Faison also encouraged citizens interested in this issue to attend the
public hearing, and clarified the proposed tax exemptions would be for residential
development and not commercial.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting
October 2,2001 - Page 4
There was concurrence of Council to approve the resolution setting the Public Hearing
date of November 6, 2001 as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Faison
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
absent
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
VI.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Gates announced the next meeting of the FinanceÆconomic
DevelopmentlRegionai Affairs Committee would be held October 3M at 9:00 a.m., and
she noted this is the September meeting that was rescheduled. She also noted the Lodging
Tax Advisory Committee would also be meeting on October 3'd Councilmember Gates
further reported on various regional issues including Sound Transit.
Councilmember Burbidge announced the next meeting of the ParkslRecreation/Human
ServiceslPublic Safety Committee would be held October 8th at 12:00 noon. She further
reported on her attendance at various regional meetings and reminded citizens of
upcoming community events.
Councilmember Faison had no report.
Councilmember McColgan announced the next meeting of the Land Use/Transportation
Committee would be held October 15th at 5:30 p.m.
Deputy Mayor Kochmar updated Council on her attendance at various community events
and regional meetings. She also reminded Council of the upcoming City of Federal Way
City Center Re-Development Workshop scheduled for October 10th.
Mayor Park noted his attendance at the Economic Development Oversight Committee.
VII.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager David Moseley update Council on the recent incident at Celebration Park
involving a transient and a small fire. He noted a jogger in the park reported seeing
smoke to a Parks Maintenance Worker who called 911. He reported very little damage
was done, where only a few trees were damaged.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting
October 2, 2001 - Page 5
Mr. Moseley was also pleased to announce the city receiving another regional award
from the Washington State Planning Association for sign code implementation. He
extended "kudos" to Director Kathy McClung, Code Compliance Officer Betty Cruz,
Planning Intern David Lee, and other staff for their efforts on receiving the second award
this year for this program.
He further reminded Council of the upcoming City of Federal Way City Center Re-
Development Workshop to be held October 10th at LaQuinta Suites Conference Center.
He asked that anyone interested in attending should contact Patrick Dorherty in
Community Development.
City Manager David Moseley reviewed the progress of the 23rd Ave project, where the
mall entrance has been realigned to match the Park & Ride entrance. He noted the project
would suspend 'activity during the upcoming holiday season.
Mr. Moseley reminded Council that staff is currently working on scheduling a study
session to review Biennial Budget adjustments, please contact Management SelVices
Director Iwen Wang if you have scheduling conflicts.
He further noted there would not be an executive session tonight.
VIII.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Potential LitigationlPursuant to RCW 42.30.1100 )(i) -cancelled
Ix.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor
Park adjourned the regular meeting at 7:55 p.m.
Stephanie D. Courtney
Deputy City Clerk
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
ITEM# ~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
VOUCHERS
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[8J CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$1,816,194.31
$1,816,194.31
$
A TT ACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor perfonned described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of
Federal Way, Washington, at I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claims.
Man
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Approve attached vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24
PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of Vouchers.
~.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
I Sf reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/1 0/2001
F'-Z--
,-.
MEMORANDUM
Date:
October 3, 2001
To:
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee
From:
Tho Kraus, Financial Management Supervisor
Subject:
Vouchers
Action Requested:
Accept the vouchers and folWard to the October 16th Council meeting for approval.
Committee Chair:
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT
\
MO' Om" >J:/M f .,¡j,J. Comm." "'mO", J"""' B".~"- ,6~v-
Committee Member: Eric Faison ~ /-- I
. I
k:finlacctspaylmfrcvr.wpd
F --I
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,25
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
= == = === === = = = = = ====== = === = = = = ======= = = === = = = = = ===== = === == = = ==== = = = ============ = ===== = == = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = == = = = = = == = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
-_uuu u u u - - - u u u u- - - u u u u u - u- u u u -- -- - - u u uU u u - -- - -- u u - u - - - - - uuuu__uu- _u_uu___n_uu
161928 08/15/01 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 01-2-08746 08/09/01 PWS-SR99 PI CONDEMNATI 56,110.00 56,110.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161929 08/15/01 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 99-2-24521 08/09/01 LAW-BFS DESIGN CLERK P 67.50 67.50
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161930 08/21/01 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 01-2-08745 08/17/01 PWS-SR99 P1 CONDEMNATI 77,200.00 77,200.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161931 08/29/01 000065 U S POSTMASTER 00722-001 08/29/01 CM-POSTAGE QTR NEWSLET 4,756.70 4,756.70
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161932 08/31/01 000004 ASSOC OF WASHINGTON CITIES MSHR-BOOK 08/08/01 MSHR-POL/FIRE SURVEY B 75.00 75.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161933 08/31/01 000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 16211872 08/05/01 MSDP-FAX MACHINE MAINT 206.58
Voucher, Bank Code, key 16213825 08/08/01 MSM&D-COPIER MAINT SVC 1,922.48
1664905A 08/07/01 PS-SHREDDER OIL 65.28 2,194.34
161934 08/31/01 000034 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY IN 362188641- 07/26/01 PRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 200.50 200.50
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161935 08/31/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 0 . 00
"VOID" Voucher, Bank Code, key
161936 08/31/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 0.00
"VOID" Voucher, Bank Code, key
161937 08/31/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 128099 08/01/01 PWS-WD-40 31.14
Voucher, Bank Code, key 128655 08/14/01 PWS-WD-40 24.22
128134 08/02/01 PWS-GALV NIPPLE/VALVES 14.78
128527 08/10/01 PWS-CLAMPS 7.42
128536 08/10/01 PWS-SEAL CLAMP 1. 86
128514 08/10/01 PKM-METAL FINISH 36.05
128671 08/14/01 PKM-PVC ADAPTOR 4.80
128707 08/15/01 PKM-ENAMEL/EPOXY/ELEC/ 19.94
128823 08/16/01 PKM-WASP/HORNET KILLER 20.51
128824 08/16/01 PKM-PVC SLIP CAPS 3.09
126514 06/27/01 PKM-PRIMER/STAIN KILLE 74.82
128705 08/15/01 PKM-RESTROOM REPAIRS 11.85
128760 08/15/01 PKM-RESTROOM REPAIRS 4.94
127146 07/12/01 PKCP-GLOVES/CLEANER/BR 17.16
127931 07/29/01 PKCP-SPRAY PAINT 11.03
127908 07/28/01 PKCP-WATER CAN/PAINT M 11.04
127993 07/30/01 PKCP-LIQUID BLEACH 1. 62
128887 08/18/01 PKM-SCREWS/BOLTS/BIT 29.16
~ 128937 08/20/01 PKM-CABLE TIE/WRENCH/B 54.43
128985 08/20/01 PKM-AIR FITTINGS/SPRIN 25.47
\.).:J
- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- - -- -- -- - - - - - -- ---- - - --- - - - - - - -- --- -- - - --- ------ - -------- - ----- ---- - --- --- ---- - - -- ------ -- --- - - - - - --- - ---
- -- -----
Page' 1
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,25
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
uuuu h__--___----_uu_--_uuu_------- UUUUU uh_U- --_u_uU_U_uuuu u_u__u__u_- _u_---_uu_-----
161937 08/31/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE CaMPA (continued)
127715 07/24/01 SWM-CEDAR FENCING 16.89
128667 08/14/01 SWM-D BATTERIES 5.67
128686 08/14/01 PWS-WOOD STAKES,OVERLA 19.56
128814 08/16/01 PKM-SACAJAWEA RESTROOM 13 .48
128851 08/17/01 PWS-PVC PIPE/COUPLING 2.82
129096 08/22/01 PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES 88.47
128981 08/20/01 SWM-CEMENT 27.37
129119 08/23/01 SWM-ELECTRIC TAPE 3.47
129134 08/23/01 SWM-CEMENT 41.07
129111 08/23/01 SWM-WORK GLOVES 9.77
129149 08/23/01 SWM-MISC HARDWARE 11.90
129000 08/21/01 PKM-SÐS BIT:RESTROOM P 7.82
129070 08/22/01 PKM-EXTERIOR SPACKL 7.53
129136 08/23/01 PKM-QUICK SET CEMENT 6.84
129147 08/23/01 PKM-PRE-MIX CONCRETE/B 21.90
129243 08/26/01 PKCP-AAA BATTERIES 9.77
128754 08/15/01 PKM-SACAJAWEA RESTROOM 15.42 715.08
161938 08/31/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 398-842-10 08/08/01 PKRLS-ELECTRICITY/GAS 785.55
Voucher: Bank Code, key 439-922-10 08/08/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 1,109.43
519-842-10 08/08/01 PKCHB-ELECTRICITY CHGS 1,963.52
345-200-20 08/09/01 PKCP-ELECTRICITY CHG:B 1,015.48
345-200-20 08/08/01 PKCP-ELECTRICITY CHG,A 2,550.30
170-120-20 08/07/01 SWM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 40.13
004-919-10 08/08/01 SWM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 21.32
303-218-10 08/17/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.47
504-228-10 08/17/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 1,961.44
980-132-10 08/16/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 487.96
121-220-20 08/10/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 5.53
221-220-20 08/10/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 5.53
225-650-20 08/08/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 147.41
359-540-20 08/14/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 24.03
420-530-20 08/14/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 100.55
487-650-20 08/14/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 193.60
330-694-99 08/14/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 146.78
497-198-10 08/08/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 95.56
604-130-20 08/08/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 180.75
625-940-20 08/09/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 239.29
652-017-10 08/08/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 144.81
669-650-20 08/14/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 272.74
753-129-10 08/22/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 99.40
786-203-10 08/08/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 94.93
886-203-10 08/08/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 87.97
889-288-10 08/09/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 5.70
895-405-10 08/15/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 129.44
888-389-10 08/08/01 MC-FACILITY ELECTRIC IT 259.13
954-567-10 08/23/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.47 12,179.22
\\
u -, - - - - uu - - -- - - --- U
~
U_U__UUUU_U_UU
UU uu Uu - u - - _u_- - - - - - - u u - nu-U - - - - - - n u _u - -_u-
Page,
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,25
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 3
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
nn___nnn-
161939 08/31/01 000061
Voucher,
161940 08/31/01 000063
Voucher,
161941 08/31/01 000089
Voucher,
161942 08/31/01 000094
Voucher,
161943 08/31/01 000096
Voucher,
161944 08/31/01 000097
Voucher,
161945 08/31/01 000101
Voucher,
161946 08/31/01 000105
Voucher,
161947 08/31/01 000106
Voucher,
161948 08/31/01 000109
Voucher,
Invoice
WA STATE-REVENUE DEPARTMENT 008
Bank Code, key
CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE
Bank Code, key
NEWS TRIBUNE
Bank Code, key
WA STATE-AUDITOR' S OFFICE
Bank Code, key
LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
Bank Code, key
EDEN SYSTEMS INC
Bank Code, key
PETTY CASH
Bank Code, key
33267850
33379410
33446820
33373390
33301611
33376910
33380630
33402050
Inv.Date Description
08/13/01 MSF-REMIT SALES/USE TA
08/01/01
08/10/01
08/17/01
08/10/01
08/17/01
08/10/01
08/10/01
08/14/01
PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES
PWA-D BATTERIES
MSF-OFFICE SUPPLIES
PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES
PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES
MSDP-OFFICE SUPPLIES
CDB-OFFICE SUPPLIES
CDB-OFFICE SUPPLIES
S804121000 06/18/01 PS-AFFIDAVIT CHARGE
L38026
2832301
2984001
460602
2049903
3088801
3200201
824102
888002
888103
896402
11300
11301
11302
011500
ICBO-INTERNATL CONFERENCE 0 636245
Bank Code, key
SELECT TRAVEL INC
Bank Code, key
08/14/01 MSF-AUDIT SVCS,JUL2001
08/13/01
08/13/01
08/17/01
08/17/01
08/22/01
08/22/01
08/22/01
08/22/01
08/22/01
08/22/01
PKM- WATER
PKM-WATER
PKM-WATER
PKM-WATER
PWS-WATER
PWS-WATER
PKM-SEWER
PKM-WATER
PKM-WATER
PKM-WATER
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
07/31/01 MSDP-PROJECT MANAGEMEN
07/31/01 MSDP-TRAVEL/OTHER EXPE
07/31/01 MSDP-SYSTEM UPGRADE- IN
08/27/01 CDA-REIM PETTY CASH
08/01/01 CDB-MEMBER DUES/WATTER
108091014 08/09/01 PS-AIRFARE, C HARTFIELD
108141075 08/14/01 PS-AIRFARE ,J LINDSAY
107241019 07/24/01 PS-TICKET CHG FEE, SCHW
107241028 07/24/01 PS-AIRFARE ,K SCHWAN
107171050C 08/02/01 PS-AIRFARE CR,K SCHWAN
08/08/01 PKRLS-MASTER PADLOCKS/
06/27/01 PKRLS-RWBF PADLOCKS
08/01/01 PS-DUPLICATE KEYS/SVC
08/16/01 PS-DUPLICATE KEYS
_nn_n_nnn n
273.87
273.87
ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12611
Bank Code, key 12563
12603
12616
n__-
- ~-- - - - - - - n n - n n n - - ---
<..J \
49.66
15.70
28.96
99.12
17 .15
85.52
24.32
23.66
344 . 09
8.00
8.00
8,519.87
8,519.87
14 .48
15.01
192.78
824.40
61.26
114.35
19.24
67.30
93.44
20.98
1,423.24
312.50
31.73
1,187.50
1,531.73
219.46
219.46
35.00
35.00
294.50
276.50
50.00
265.00
-260.00
626.00
22.97
112.54
44.35
29.41
209.27
_n--_- - - n - - ___n - nn - _n- n_- _--_n - u_n
Page' 3
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,26
."tÞ
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 4
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Date
161949 08/31/01 000112
Voucher,
161950 08/31/01 000125
Voucher,
161951 08/31/01 000142
Voucher,
161952 08/31/01 000168
Voucher,
161953 08/31/01 000173
Voucher,
161954 08/31/01 000201
Voucher,
161955 08/31/01 000202
Voucher,
161956 08/31/01 000217
Voucher,
161957 08/31/01 000253
Voucher,
161958 08/31/01 000285
Voucher,
161959 08/31/01 000328
Voucher,
161960 08/31/01 000340
Voucher,
161961 08/31/01 000341
Voucher,
161962 08/31/01 000343
Voucher,
Invoice
nn_nn-
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
Bank Code, key
FOCS65704
FOW245146
Inv.Date Description
-- --n_nnnn_- n
08/07/01 PS-REPLACE FUSE,M14894
08/27/01 MSFLT-COVER ASSEMBLY
07/18/01 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MA
07/23/01 PS-KING CO JAIL{JUNE}
08/16/01 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MA
CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE TRA CHECK #176 08/15/01 PS-SPILLMAN USERS CONF
Bank Code, key
98.70
50.02
148.72
KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISIO 1054169
Bank Code, key 1059290
1062511
DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE I 3118926
Bank Code, key
08/13/01 SWR-RFP, COMPOST BINS
WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 680-599-30 08/13/01 LAW-WA PRAC VOL 5 - 5C
Bank Code, key 98810 07/31/01 MSDP-DATABASE ACCESS S
KINKO'S INC
Bank Code, key
5151000583
5151000583
5151000584
5151000580
5151000578
5151000584
5151000584
08/09/01
08/13/01
08/16/01
07/23/01
07/13/01
08/14/01
08/17/01
CM- PRINT DIVERSITY BUS
CDB- PRINTING SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PWD- PRINTING SERVICES
PWD- PRINTING SERVICES
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
PKC-PRINT,SKATE PK SIG
5,146.62
75,041.87
18,592.20
98,780.69
QWEST
Bank Code, key
206-Z04-06 08/04/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 5-889-8345 08/10/01 CM-DELIVERY SVCS,JNOG
Bank Code, key 5-936-1194 08/17/01 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES
WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEP ATB1081412 08/14/01 PWS-PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Bank Code, key ATB1081416 08/14/01 PWS-PROJECT MANAGEMENT
FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2110-003-0 07/31/01 PKRCS-FIRE CODE PERMIT
Bank Code, key
ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA)
Bank Code, key
0083858
0083859
08/15/01 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE
08/15/01 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVIC 2001070220 08/02/01 MSDP-WINDOWS CLIENT CD
Bank Code, key
393.01
393.01
SUNRISE SELF STORAGE
Bank Code, key
UNIT #A08
08/24/01 PS-STORAGE RENTAL FEE/
ELEPHANT CAR WASH
Bank Code, key
200-JUL 20 07/31/01 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE
132.00
132.00
120.77
675.04
795.81
11.70
54.40
68.00
25.33
117.14
188.77
22.85
488.19
5,733.74
5,733.74
7.90
61.55
69.45
120.20
688.94
809.14
100.00
100.00
2,096.60
3,555.20
5,651.80
93.25
93.25
155.00
155.00
362.26
362.26
1\ - - - - - - - - - - - - _.. - - - - --- - - - - - - - _n_- - - - - - - - _u__n__nn__U- _u_-----_uuuu___n___--u_u__nnn--_----__n- uu__u_-;~;~;-~
~
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,26
.*
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
""""""" = = = =" == = = = = == ===== == = = ======== = = = === = = = = == ==== = ========== == = = = = = = = =" = ======= === == = = = == = =" ="" = = = = = = = = == = == = = = = = =
= = == ="" = = =="= =
Check Date Vendor
uUu - - - - - -
161963 08/31/01 000368 PERKINS COlE LLP
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161964 08/31/01 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161965 08/31/01 000438
Voucher,
Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
__n____n n_--_u--n_nnn_-- _uun__--n_- __u--_nun
LAW-BRIEFI 08/22/01 LAW-EMPLOY LAW BRIEF 240.00
20010731 07/31/01 PWS-STLMT REVIEW SR99 750.00 990.00
5043
5044
5046
5049
DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONE 2088
Bank Code, key
161967 08/31/01 000512 PUGET SOUND BUSINESS JOURNA 4000129151 08/17/01 CM-RFP, FEASIBILITY STU
Voucher, Bank Code, key 4000128301 08/10/01 CM-RFP,FEASIBILITY STU
161968 08/31/01 000533 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES INC 16227 08/20/01 PKCP-S200 MARKING CHAL
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161969 08/31/01 000537 WACE-WA ASSOC CODE ENFORCEM 01- 00013 08/07/01 CDB-FALL CONF FEES
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161970 08/31/01 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB
"VOID' * Voucher, Bank Code, key
161966 08/31/01 000504
Voucher,
ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER
Bank Code, key
084588
084588
085939
086130
086025
08/09/01 PKDBC-AVANTA (ADD ON 4
08/09/01 PKDBC-AVANTA (ADD ON 4
07/31/01 PKDBC-CREDIT,CONTEXT
08/13/01 PKDBC-EDS/WEYERHAEUSER
08/10/01 PS-LUNCH, EVOC INST TRG
07/20/01 PKCP-BLOWER SPARK PLUG
08/20/01 PKCP-SPARK PLUGS
08/21/01 SWM-STIHL STONES
08/27/01 PKM-SPARK PLUG/FILTER/
08/24/01 PKM-CARBURETOR REPAIR
EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB 1012323 07/19/01
Bank Code, key 1012463 07/24/01
1012505 07/26/01
1012508 07/26/01
1012532 07/27/01
1012538 07/27/01
1012539 07/27/01
1012567 07/28/01
1012625 07/31/01
1012643 08/01/01
1012661 08/01/01
1012669 08/02/01
1012689 08/03/01
1012704 08/03/01
1012709 08/03/01
1012761 08/06/01
1012777 08/07/01
1012794 08/08/01
1012818 08/09/01
l\ 1012822 08/09/01
---\-c_- - - ----------_u______n____--_____nn-_---__--n_____n___----
~
161971 08/31/01 000570
Voucher,
40.80
149.60
-191.42
285.75
284.73
140.78
140.78
8.48
8.48
30.24
100.74
37.32
185.26
270.00
270.00
540.00
378.23
378.23
380.00
380.00
0.00
PS-TIRE REPAIR,M97668
PS-LOF,M92347
PS-ENGINE LIGHT, M92127
PS-BRAKES/LOF, Ml9137
PS-TRANS SVC/LOF,M9478
PS-LOF /FLUID, M3535
PS-THERMOSTAT /SENSOR/L
PS-ELEC DIAGNOSTIC/LOF
PS-LOF/TIRE REPAIR,M19
PS-CONVERTER/ELEC REPA
PS-BRAKES/LOF, M23678
PS-BRAKES ,M21807
PS-LOF,M92173
PS-TIRES,M17871
PS-LAMP ASSY, M26386
PS-TIRE REPAIR,M19863
PS-TIRES ,M21683
PS-CLEAN BRAKES,M78298
PS- LOF /ROTATE TIRES, M2
PS-TIRES ,M20110
13.32
25.01
77.68
184.76
130.38
26.64
170.99
63.09
38.07
74.31
327.25
169.23
25.01
142.85
150.79
13 .32
68.16
23.31
38.07
142.85
-- - n__- ___n - - - u - - - n- ------ - - -- - - - - u_- n - - _un
Page, 5
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,26
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
Check
Vendor
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""" =" = = = = ="" == = = == = = = = == = ="= = ===== = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = =" == = = = = =" ==
= =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Date
Invoice
--- -------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - ---------
161971 08/31/01 000570
161972 08/31/01 000575
Voucher,
161973 08/31/01 000578
Voucher,
161974 08/31/01 000602
Voucher,
161975 08/31/01 000630
Voucher,
161976 08/31/01 00067:
Voucher,
161977 08/31/01 000721
Voucher,
161978 08/31/01 000783
Voucher,
161979 08/31/01 000792
Voucher,
161980 08/31/01 000829
Voucher,
161981 08/31/01 000854
Voucher,
EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE {DB
1012833
1012928
1012929
1013091
ATTORNEYS INFORMATION BUREA 1538
Bank Code, key
DETAIL PLUS
Bank Code, key
11268
PUGET SOUND INSTRUMENT CO I 410311
Bank Code, key
LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC
Bank Code, key
55647
55410
55433
55548
55602
55782
H D FOWLER COMPANY
Bank Code, key
1033493
1034969
1034335
1033492
1039606
AMERICAN CONCRETE INC
Bank Code, key
0074397
0074530
0074580
0074626
0074594
Inv. Date Description
---------------------- --------------- ---
(continued)
08/09/01 PS-HEADLAMP ,M93022
08/14/01 PS-WIPER BLADES ,M35396
08/14/01 PS-LOF,M25666
08/21/01 MSFLT-TIRE REPAIR #481
07/31/01 LAW-AUG MEMBER FEES
07/28/01 MSFLT-VEHICLE DETAIL
06/29/01 MSDP/PW-RADIO REPAIR
08/07/01
07/18/01
07/23/01
08/01/01
08/06/01
08/15/01
PKM-PRO GRO
PKM-CLASS A ROCK
PKM-l-l/4"CRUSHED ROCK
SWM-TOPSOIL
SWM-TOPSOIL
PKCP- PLAYFIELD SAND
08/09/01 PKM-PAINT MARKER STICK
08/13/01 PKM-PVC/SWING JOINT MI
08/10/01 PKM-PVC/COUPLING/PIPE
08/09/01 PKM-VALVE ACTUATOR/CON
08/22/01 PKM-METER BOX BASE/LID
08/07/01 SWM-CRUSHED ROCK
08/14/01 SWM-PEA GRAVEL
08/15/01 SWM-PEA GRAVEL
08/17/01 SWM-PEA GRAVEL
08/16/01 SWM-PEA GRAVEL
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Bank Code, key
0000777105 08/01/01 PWSWR-LITTER DISPOSAL
BARRY'S TRUCKING & LANDS CAP 1047
Bank Code, key
PACIFIC PLAYGROUND INC
Bank Code, key
S13615
D J TROPHY
Bank Code, key
2 05158A
215149A
161982 08/31/01 000862
1"\ Voucher,
\
- -~ - - - - - -- - - - -- ---- -- - - --- - ------- -- - -----
KING COUNTY PARKS & RECREAT 6610
Bank Code, key
08/29/01 PKCHB-PRESSURE WASH SV
07/31/01 PKC-PLAYGRND EQUIPMENT
08/16/01 CDCI-NAME BADGES
08/17/01 CM-DIVERSITY COMM,NAME
08/13/01 CDA-DEPARTMENT RETREAT
20.67
28.84
25.01
13.32
1,992.93
461.61
461. 61
522.24
522.24
317.09
317.09
333.73
633.14
374.55
94.78
189.55
321.68
1,947.43
19.98
289.78
167.42
688.61
340.10
1,505.89
211.83
99.28
81.30
82.96
152.32
627.69
315.88
315.88
244.80
244.80
20,548.51
20,548.51
14.68
31.00
45.68
55.00
55.00
- - ---- -- - --- - --- H- -- - - - - --- ----- - -- ---- ---- -- --
Page, 6
0 chklst
08(30(2001 12: 38: 26
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 7
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
h_--__- - --- ------ -- ---- ------------_u_- - -- UUU_h- _U___h hhUU-__hU_U_U- UUU__U_hh _UUhUUhU_h
161983 08(31(01 000874 MACHINERY COMPONENTS INC 86687NERY 08(09(01 MSFLT-MOWER BEARINGS 16 .12
Voucher: Bank Code: key 86776NERY 08(22(01 MSFLT-MOWER 22"REEL 427.85
86720 08(20(01 PKM-BEARING 23.07 467.04
161984 08(31(01 000876 FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC 006-368569 07(26(01 PKM-LAKOTA RESTROOM SU 71.66 71.66
Voucher: Bank Code: key
161985 08(31(01 000891 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 8431219920 08(07(01 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 164.15
Voucher: Bank Code: key 8431161460 08(07(01 PWS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.31
8431080960 08(13(01 PS-COMPUTER CASE 163.19
8431173790 08(14(01 PS-CREDIT: 843108 096000 -163.19 180.46
161986 08(31(01 000938 PRYOR RESOURCES INC 5684406 07 (25(01 CDPL-SEMINAR FEE(GAMBL 59.00 59.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
161987 08(31(01 000947 YOUR INC DBA 2668 08(20(01 PS-JANITORIAL SERVICES 1,275.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key 2669 08/20(01 PKM-JANITORIAL SERVICE 705.00
2671 08(20(01 MC-JANITORIAL SERVICES 660.00 2,640.00
161988 08(31/01 000954 DNB MAILING SERVICES 5283 08/10(01 CM-QTR NEWSLETTER 1,058.01
Voucher: Bank Code: key 5307 08/16/01 PWSWR-POSTCARD MAILING 592.94 1,650.95
161989 08/31(01 000960 MATTHEW BENDER & COMPANY IN 11651016 08(14(01 MC-WA APPELLATE REPORT 95.02 95.02
Voucher: Bank Code: key
161990 08/31(01 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC 20236543 08(21(01 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPPL 57.00 57.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
161991 08(31(01 001012 AL' STOWING 53449 06(12(01 PS-TOWING SERVICES 82.14 82.14
Voucher: Bank Code: key
161992 08(31(01 001018 NELSON TRUCK EQUIPMENT CO I 268764 08/24(01 MSFLT-LIGHT #48035 137.09 137.09
Voucher: Bank Code: key
161993 08(31(01 001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION 4276102 07(24(01 PS-CREDIT INFORMATION 45.01 45.01
Voucher: Bank Code: key
161994 08/31(01 001052 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 594696 08(15/01 PKM-HOSE CLAMPS 21.65
Voucher: Bank Code: key 595046 08(17/01 PWS-AIR FILTER 16.85
593257 08(07/01 MSFLT-BATTERY #48404 52.75
594745 08(15/01 MSFLT-LAMP BULB 8.70
594878 08(16/01 MSFLT-HALOGEN BULB 1. 63
596081 08(22/01 MSFLT-BULBS 4.32
595986 08(22/01 MSFLT-WIPER REFILL 5.97 111.87
161995 08(31(01 001124 VERIZON WIRELESS 1004-65261 08(05/01 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 847. 91 847.91
Voucher: Bank Code: key
~- - U - - - - h U h h - - - - - h - h U - U U - U h - U U U - h h - - U - h - - - - U U U U - h h U - - - h h - U - - - U - U - - U - - U - - - - - - - - - U - U U - - U - - - - U
-b Page:
,;;-.
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,26
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 8
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
----Uh h__h_- h--_hU_---__--_hn__----_h_n-- ----_nn- --__n_- --_hnu------------- _--h---------- ------_--_--__hh
161996 08/31/01 001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC 001183 08/11/01 MSFLT-TRANS SVC/LOF,M7 138.90
Voucher, Bank Code, key 001181 08/11/01 MSFLT-TRANS SVC/LOF, M3 138.90
001209 08/16/01 MSFLT-A/C COMPRESSOR/L 887.69
001195 08/20/01 MSFLT-PUMP ASSY/AC FAN 241.77 1,407.26
161997 08/31/01 001166 PETTY CASH 011518 08/24/01 PRCS-REIM PETTY CASH 217.47 217.47
Voucher, Bank Code, key
161998 08/31/01 001189 PETTY CASH 0114 76 08/21/01 CM-REIM PETTY CASH 173.64
Voucher, Bank Code, key 011552 08/29/01 CM-REIM PETTY CASH 176.34 349.98
161999 08/31/01 001213 SECOMA FENCE INC 2020 08/22/01 PWS-FENCING REPAIRS 306 82 306.82
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162000 08/31/01 001233 A T & T BUSINESS SERVICE 0510645149 08/15/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 22.87
Voucher, Bank Code, key 0510660202 08/07/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 16.30
0510691538 08/15/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 16.30
0510714612 07/24/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 24.58
0510715657 07/24/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 7.23
0584948549 08/13/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 16.30 103.58
162001 08/31/01 001234 MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX ROURKE I 9025-00M-R 06/30/01 MSC-HEARING EXAMINER S 294 .00 294.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162002 08/31/01 001240 INRO CONSULTANTS INC 12851 08/01/01 MSDP-EMME/2 SOFTWARE S 540.00 540.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162003 08/31/01 001267 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC 311451 08/06/01 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 21.13 21.13
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162004 08/31/01 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC 44228 08/09/01 PWS-HOT CRACK FILL 1,175.04 1,175.04
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162005 08/31/01 001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRA 034215 08/15/01 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINTENA 297.03
Voucher, Bank Code, key 034216 08/15/01 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINTENA 608.20
034214 08/15/01 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINTENA 480.90
034222 08/15/01 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINTENA 848.64 2,234.77
162006 08/31/01 001377 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC 6330017957 08/13/01 SWMM-CATCH BASIN BASE 477.40 477.40
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162007 08/31/01 001399 CAPITAL LIGHTING COMPANY IN 67527 08/13/01 PKM-POLYCARBONATE LENS 95.53 95.53
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162008 08/31/01 001427 WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT J17651 08/09/01 MSFLT-CUSHIONS/SHROUD 474.78 474.78
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162009 08/31/01 001430 WHITE CAP/BURKE 437588 07/31/01 SWMCIP-BURKE PLUG 50LB 96.69
Voucher, Bank Code, key 466563 08/07/01 SWMM-JUTE MESH 145.81 242.50
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - ----
\ Page' 8
---
\:>
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,26
,'"'
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 9
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = === = = === = = = = = ==== = = === = = = = = = = = = =========== ========== === = = = = = = ==== = ==== = = == = ==== ==== = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == =
= = = = = = = === = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
----------
162010 08/31/01 001431
Voucher,
162011 08/31/01 001436
Voucher,
162012 08/31/01 001481
Voucher,
162013 08/31/01 001612
Voucher,
162014 08/31/01 001618
Voucher,
162015 08/31/01 001630
Voucher,
162016 08/31/01 001692
Voucher,
162017 08/31/01 001715
Voucher,
162018 08/31/01 001748
Voucher,
162019 08/31/01 001793
Voucher,
162020 08/31/01 001794
Voucher,
ICON MATERIALS INC
Bank Code, key
TREE RECYCLERS
Bank Code, key
CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC
Bank Code, key
POLLARD GROUP INC
Bank Code, key
SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOc; GLASS
Bank Code, key
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
Bank Code, key
ACE GALVANIZING INC
Bank Code, key
TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN
Bank Code, key
EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC
Bank Code, key
MICROFLEX INC
Bank Code, key
PETE'S TOWING SERVICE
Bank Code, key
Invoice
-- ----------
21104
21725
10805
3282894
53621
53703
1049203
193294
200312
200950
201160
198617-01
201064
198746-01
200827
194684
200659
202442
197364-80
200658
201254
200653
232758
232759
57738
015220
00013154
260057
Inv, Date Description
---------------------- --------------- ------------------
08/06/01 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT
08/20/01 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
08/05/01 PKM-TREE REMOVAL SVCS
78,06
116,52
194.58
195.84
195.84
08/09/01 PWSCIP-PACIFIC HWY SO
28,436.68
28,436.68
08/13/01 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS
08/20/01 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS
08/15/01 PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR
08/10/01 PKM-GALVANIZED TUBES
08/10/01 PWS-GALVANIZED TUBES
08/11/01 PKCP-PESTICIDE SVCS
07/23/01
07/23/01
07/24/01
07/25/01
07/26/01
07/26/01
07/27/01
07/27/01
08/08/01
08/08/01
08/08/01
08/08/01
08/08/01
08/08/01
08/08/01
194.36
166.30
360.66
32.64
32.64
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-FLASHLIGHT RING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS - UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS- UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
PS-TACTICAL BATONS
PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
13.06
33.67
100.00
15.18
25.51
100.00
10.34
234.90
80.57
77.19
100.00
11.97
117.45
78.34
117.45
1,115.63
119.68
602.75
722.43
663.68
663.68
08/21/01 SWM-VACUUM/JET RODDING
7,027.29
7,027.29
08/02/01 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
65.40
65.40
08/13/01 MSFLT-TOWING SVC/TORO
201.28
201.28
162021 08/31/01 001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE SVC #730KLCC-S 08/20/01 PKRLS-#730 KLCC RENTAL 493.49
Voucher, Bank Code, key #734/MC-SE 08/20/01 MC-9TH AVE BLDG LEASE 5,947.00
\\
- '\---- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - ------ --- ------- --- ------------------------ --- -------------- ---- ----- --- --- -- - ----- ---- - - - - - --- - - - --- -----
- Page, 9
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,27
=
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 10
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = == = = == = = = = = = = == = = === === = = == = == = = == = == = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = === = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Date
Invoice
-_U_---_U_-_uU__n__u_n__u__- -___--n_-
162021 08/31/01 001843
162022 08/31/01 001969
Voucher,
162023 08/31/01 001988
Voucher,
162024 08/31/01 001990
Voucher,
162025 08/31/01 001998
Voucher,
162026 08/31/01 001999
Voucher,
162027 08/31/01 00200',
Voucher,
162028 08/31/01 002137
Voucher,
162029 08/31/01 002231
Voucher,
162030 08/31/01 002379
Voucher,
162031 08/31/01 002386
Voucher,
162032 08/31/01 002426
Voucher,
162033 08/31/01 002480
Voucher,
MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE SVC
#734/PS-SE 08/20/01 PS- 9TH AVE BLDG LEASE
19,637.90
254.59
(continued)
26,078.39
254.59
CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 16266
Bank Code, key
SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY
Bank Code, key
802/2672
809/7994
816/3556
823/8414
113/0500
Inv. Date Description
nnn_n_n-n___---- nnnnnnn- nnnu_unun-
08/14/01 MSC-FW CITY CODE
08/02/01 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES
08/09/01 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES
08/16/01 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES
08/23/01 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES
08/13/01 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL
27.09
26.75
26.75
29.79
110.38
81.10
81.10
12,345.99
12,345.99
WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME MAT
Bank Code, key
R W SCOTT CONSTRUCTION CO I 11R,AGOO-1 08/17/01 PWSCIP-S 320 ST/SR99 I
Bank Code, key
BANK OF AMERICA
Bank Code, key
11R,RW SCO 08/17/01 PWSCIP-5% RETAINAGE,RW
649.79
649.79
PETPRO PRODUCTS INC
Bank Code, key
20281
08/13/01 PKM-PET DISPOSAL BAGS
584.35
584.35
08/14/01 SWM-VANED GRATE
1,002.50
1,002.50
07/31/01 CDPL-ENV REV,VEGETATIO
07/31/01 CDPL-ENV REV,NEW HIGH
08/07/01
08/07/01
08/07/01
08/08/01
07/23/01
08/06/01
08/07/01
08/07/01
08/07/01
08/10/01
08/27/01
08/21/01
35.00
85.00
120.00
SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
DC- INTERPRETER, CA16 04 0
DC-INTERPRETER, CA08684
MC-INTERPRETER, CA146 09
MC-INTERPRETER, CA2118 9
MC-INTERPRETER, CAl9136
DC- INTERPRETER, CAO 94 71
MC-INTERPRETER, CA18255
MC- INTERPRETER, CA19962
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
440.00
43.75
26.25
70.00
87.50
61.25
35.00
52.50
35.00
411. 25
INLAND FOUNDRY COMPANY INC
Bank Code, key
K27084
07/19/01 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
07/29/01 PKRCS-DAYCAMP FOOD
08/17 /01 PKCHB-FIRE ALARM INSP
1. 05
14.20
15.25
364.48
364.48
SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC
Bank Code, key
96540
96 54 9
- ~-- - -- -- -----------------------------_U_---___U--_n--n___--__---_U----_U_-------------- -- ---- - -- - - ---- - - - - - --------~~~~ :-~;
-
\'J
PACIFIC TOPSOILS INC
Bank Code, key
28531
28534
28526
28556
PAWLAK, SUSAN
Bank Code, key
CA16040FW
CA08684FW
CA14609FW
CA21189FW
CAl9136/37
CAD9471FW
CA18255FW
CA19962FW
UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY 3467
Bank Code, key 4829
SIGNAL EQUIPMENT INC
Bank Code, key
15572
0 chklst
08/30/200112'38'27
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 11
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
uuu- u- _u - _uu - uu --
162034 08/31/01 002501
Voucher,
162035 08/31/01 002521
Voucher,
162036 08/31/01 002545
Voucher,
162037 08/31/01 002548
Voucher,
162038 08/31/01 002557
Voucher,
162039 08/31/01 002566
Voucher,
162040 08/31/01 002623
Voucher,
162041 08/31/01 002664
Voucher,
162042 08/31/01 002679
Voucher'
162043 08/31/01 003048
Voucher,
162044 08/31/01 003093
Voucher,
162045 08/31/01 003118
Voucher,
162046 08/31/01 003121
Voucher,
162047 08/31/01 003129
Voucher,
162048 08/31/01 003138
Voucher,
SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO
Bank Code, key
SUPERLON PLASTICS COMPANY
Bank Code, key
PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC
Bank Code' key
SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL
Bank Code, key
Invoice
105310
105434
01F4229
Olf4269
65988
1-300259
1-301718
1-300210
1-300211
PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT 011496
Bank Code, key
QWEST
Bank Code, key
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
Bank Code, key
FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC
Bank Code, key
KANG, SAI C
Bank Code, key
Inv. Date Description
-_uuu_u----_uu_-
08/10/01 SWMCIP-MANHOLES/SUPPLI
08/18/01 SWM-MANHOLE/LADDER
08/16/01 SWMM-MISC SUPPLIES/PAR
08/20/01 SWMM-6" GLUE SEWER
08/14/01 PKRLS-HVAC MAINT SVCS
08/06/01 PKM-PEST CONTROL SVCS
08/02/01 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC
08/06/01 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC
08/06/01 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC
08/22/01 PKM-REIM PETTY CASH
TAC-3644-6 07/25/01 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD
8541J145-R OS/25/01 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLIES
757J155-R 06/04/01 PWS-MIDBACK MANAGER
7357J158-R 06/07/01 PKA-VOLUNTEER PLAQUE
34456
08/24/01 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVC
MAR30-JUN1 07/30/01 MC-INTERPRETER,3/30-6/
PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DE 011439
Bank Code, key
CASCADE COMPUTER MAINTENANC 9041991
Bank Code, key
GALL'S INC
Bank Code, key
FEDERAL WAY DISCOUNT GUNS
Bank Code, key
AMS LASER SUPPLY
Bank Code, key
NORMED
Bank Code, key
--TI- - - - ----- -- -- - - - - --- -- ---- ------- ---
,
\;J
08/21/01 PS-REIM PETTY CASH
08/14/01 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT
5504895201 08/03/01 PS-DISP TRANSPORT HOOD
011139
316155
08/22/01 PS- FIREARMS, RFB01-1 06
08/07/01 MSDP-PRINTER TONER
12378-3636 08/07/01 PS-GLOVES, CIS
12378-3636 08/07/01 PS-GLOVES, PATROL
12378-3636 08/07/01 PS-GLOVES, PROP /EVIDENC
---_u_--_uu_-------_uuu-
---_uU_--_U----
1,627.88
348.63
1,976.51
95.75
4.68
100.43
608.86
608.86
89.22
65.28
92.48
51.14
298.12
162.45
162.45
106.60
106.60
88.69
70.72
16.31
175.72
294.30
294.30
262.50
262.50
317.99
317.99
508.64
508.64
78.99
78.99
26,206.66
26,206.66
384.93
384.93
227.83
235.89
176.20
639.92
u - -_u- - - - u_u- -_u- - -_u-
Page, 11
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,27
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 12
= = = = ======== = = ==== = = == === = = ========== = ==== = == == = === = == = === = ==== ===== ==== = === = = = ======== = = == === = = = = = === = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = ==
== = = = = == = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
hh___- ___hh- -_h__h___"-,,---,,hh_hh_hh- hhhhh h_h_h _hh_hhhhhh-_h hhhhhh_h -_hu__h_h__-h
162049 08/31/01 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 29731 08/13/01 PKM-FIRE ALARM SVC CAL 92.21 92.21
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162050 08/31/01 003228 HORNADY MANUFACTURING 199374 08/02/01 PS-AMMUNITION 1,022.50 1,022.50
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162051 08/31/01 003251 SECURITY BARRICADE INC 6242 08/13/01 PS-CONES,EVOC TRAINING 794.24 794 .24
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162052 08/31/01 003270 SEBRIS BUSTO PS 30286 08/16/01 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES 144.00 144.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162053 08/31/01 003325 CHUCKALS INC 167920-1 08/28/01 MC-NAME PLATES/HOLDER 31.82
Voucher, Bank Code, key 167920-0 08/23/01 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.27 41.09
162054 08/31/01 003340 SMITH PHD, DAVID H PS-JUL 18T 08/14/01 PS-PRE-EMP PSYCH EXAM 275.00 275.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162055 08/31/01 003371 OFFICE TEAM 05874891 08/06/01 CM-TEMP CLERICAL HELP 738.80
Voucher, Bank Code, key 05951264 08/16/01 CM-TEMP CLERICAL HELP 295.52
05776207 07/23/01 CDA-TEMP CLERICAL HELP 359.89 1,394.21
162056 08/31/01 003399 KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY JUL10-JUL1 08/10/01 MC-INTERPRETER SVCS, 7/ 170.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key CA20604FW 07/09/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA20604 40.00
AUG14-AUG1 08/21/01 MC-INTERPRETER,AUG14-1 100.00 310.00
162057 08/31/01 003462 JUNKER, RYAN PS-AUG 19T 08/19/01 PS-REIM EQP PADLOCKS 52.18 52.18
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162058 08/31/01 003466 LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY IN 195663 08/02/01 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIE 253.25 253.25
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162059 08/31/01 003469 ROAD WARRIORS INC 80100 08/13/01 PWS-FLAGGING SERVICE 1,199.52 1,199.52
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162060 08/31/01 003520 PHUNG, NOVA C CA20093FW 08/07/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA20093 120.00 120.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162061 08/31/01 003560 HUNTERS TREE SERVICE 1027 08/13/01 PWS-TREE REMOVAL SVCS 434.40
Voucher, Bank Code, key 1033 08/17/01 SWM-TREE REMOVAL SVCS 217.20 651.60
162062 08/31/01 003565 MONAK INC 1699 08/01/01 PS-UNIFORM DRY CLEANIN 2,435.49 2,435.49
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162063 08/31/01 003593 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LAB INC 0255507 07/17/01 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIE 122.73
Voucher, Bank Code, key 0255327 07/16/01 PS-SUPPLY KITS,EVIDENC 462.58 585.31
162064 08/31/01 003718 JENKINS, HARDY & ASSOC, PLL AUG1-AUG31 08/20/01 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENDER SV 16,102.00 16,102.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
-:D - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - ---- ---- --- - ____h__- - - -----------_"_"__h______- -----..-------------- - -- - ---- - -------- - - - --- - __"h__.___-
, Page, 12
.......
~
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,27
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 13
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = == == = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = === = ====== = = = = = = = = = = = ======= ==== = = = = == = === = = = = ==== ====== = = ======= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = == == = = = = = = == = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
Inv. Date Description
----------u____uuhh-u--_uu_- __h-uu-
u_----_u_-----------
162065 08/31/01 003730
Voucher,
162066 08/31/01 003831
Voucher,
162067 08/31/01 003837
Voucher,
162068 08/31/01 003987
Voucher,
162069 08/31/01 004052
Voucher,
162070 08/31/01 004163
Voucher,
162071 08/31/01 004270
Voucher,
162072 08/31/01 004315
Voucher,
162073 08/31/01 004366
Voucher,
162074 08/31/01 004383
Voucher,
162075 08/31/01 004412
Voucher,
162076 08/31/01 004443
Voucher,
162077 08/31/01 004468
Voucher,
162078 08/31/01 004533
Voucher,
'1ì
,
r- -hh-
-,
LE MONS, ROBERT C
Bank Code, key
CA20197FW
CA20551FW
GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES
Bank Code, key
01-015
08/07/01 MC-INTERPRETER, CA2 0197
08/09/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA20551
08/15/01 PS-POLYGRAPH EXAMS
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Bank Code, key
000F6588V3 08/04/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
000F80F483 08/11/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
WINSTAR BROADBAND SERVICES
Bank Code, key
849362
LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT D 07190101
Bank Code, key 08180107
CSI-CTR FOR SYSTEM INTEGRIT AO11
Bank Code, key
FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
Bank Code, key
003273
003231-CM
003264
003261
003280
BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REPAIR
Bank Code, key
002402
002417
FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPANY DBA 15686
Bank Code, key
08/07/01 MSDP-INTERNET ACCESS
07/19/01 PS-BALLISTIC VEST
08/18/01 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
08/29/01 PS-LEADERSHIP TRAINING
08/11/01 MSC-ORDINANCE 01-399/4
07/21/01 MSC-CREDIT, INV 003231
08/08/01 PWSWR-RFP,COMPOST BINS
08/08/01 PWSWR-RFP,PILOT PROGRA
08/15/01 PWSWR-RFP,COMPOST BINS
08/13/01 MSFLT-ALIGN/BALL JOINT
08/15/01 MSFLT-RADIATOR,M25087
08/14/01 PKM-FLAT/CHANNEL METAL
JUL20-AUG2 08/22/01 PS-REIM PARKING/LUNCH
KIRKPATRICK, ANNE
Bank Code, key
CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS SALE 124 - 01
Bank Code, key
07/31/01 PS-MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS
HERNANDEZ, JOHNNY
Bank Code, key
PS-AUG 13T 08/13/01 PS-REIMB,SHOE ALLOWANC
TACOMA RAINIERS
Bank Code, key
11906
LINKLETTER, MONTSERRAT
Bank Code, key
CA16039FW
CA14007FW
CA20259FW
IA53430FW
_--h______---_uu_---
--_uu___u__huU
07/31/01 PRCS-BASEBALL TICKETS
08/13/01 DC- INTERPRETER, CA16039
08/13/01 DC- INTERPRETER, CA14007
08/14/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA20259
08/17/01 MC-INTERPRETER,IA53430
---------u-u--u
60.00
60.00
120.00
625.00
625.00
59.58
22.29
81.87
500.00
500.00
719.36
48.66
768.02
2,500.00
2,500.00
101.20
- 0.60
63.25
66.83
60.75
291.43
422.58
415.26
837.84
86.05
86.05
54.01
54.01
835.28
835.28
54.39
54.39
90.00
90.00
40.00
90.00
70.00
80.00
280.00
-------- ---- ---- --- - - -- - --- --- --- - --- - - - -- ------- --_u_--
Page, 13
0 chk1st
08/30/2001 12,38,27
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 14
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = == == = = = == = == = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = === ===== = = == === ==== = ====== = = === = = ==== ===== = = = = = = = = = ==
= == == = = === == = = = == = = = = ==
Amount Paid
Check Total
Date
-----______n_nn_nh-
162079 08/31/01 004550
Voucher,
162080 08/31/01 004566
Voucher,
162081 08/31/01 004578
Voucher,
162082 08/31/01 004582
Voucher,
162083 08/31/01 004599
Voucher,
162084 08/31/01 004600
Voucher,
162085 08/31/01 004605
Voucher,
162086 08/31/01 004840
Voucher,
162087 08/31/01 004849
Voucher,
162088 08/31/01 004866
Voucher,
SOFTECH INC
Bank Code, key
G&M HONEST PERFORMANCE
Bank Code, key
GENE'S TOWING INC
Bank Code, key
STANLEY M SLOWIK INC
Bank Code, key
GOLF LANDSCAPING INC
Bank Code, key
COLUMBIA STATE BANK
Bank Code, key
Invoice
98731
27428
208546
PS-SCHWAN
Inv. Date Description
08/13/01 PS-TECH SUPPORT AGRMT
nn--h___h_h_-UU - n_----nnn nu_n_--_un_n
60.00
60.00
08/14/01 MSFLT-BEARING PRESS
07/11/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES
08/08/01 PS-PRE-EMPLOY TRAINING
4,AG01-050 08/02/01 PWS-BPA TRAIL CORRIDOR
4 ,GOLF LAN 08/02/01 PWS-5% RETAINAGE,GOLF
IPTM-INST OF POLICE TECHNOL 2200200723 07/18/01 PS-CRASH INVEST TRNG
Bank Code, key 2200200724 07/18/01 PS-CRASH INVEST TRNG
EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE
Bank Code, key
100278
100270
100268
100243
100261
100274
100275
100277
100255
100240
100097
100094
100098
100248
100099
100096
100095
SAM'S JANITORIAL SERVICE &, 56051
Bank Code, key 56127
56073
56129
55200
BRIM TRACTOR COMPANY INC
Bank Code, key
l'
"-
---~-----------______nn_n_n------n_n_-
41233
34881
08/14/01
08/09/01
08/09/01
07/27/01
08/09/01
08/14/01
08/14/01
08/14/01
08/06/01
07/26/01
06/01/01
06/01/01
06/01/01
07/31/01
06/01/01
06/01/01
06/01/01
PS-TEST CHARGE GUARD
PS-REPL BAD CRADLE
PS-REPL FUSE/CRADLE
PS-REPL ANTENNA/CONNEC
PS-REPAIR WIRES/REPL M
PS - UNIVERSAL NIGHT EYE
PS-UNIVERSAL NIGHT EYE
PS-REPL KNOB,SIREN SWI
PS-INSTALL EQUIPMENT #
PS- INSTALL PRO-GARD #9
PS-INSTALL EQUIPMENT #
PS-INSTALL EQUIPMENT #
PS- INSTALL DOME LIGHT
PS- INSTALL DOME LIGHT
PS- INSTALL GUN RACK #6
PS - INSTALL DOME LIGHT
PS-INSTALL GUN RACK #6
08/06/01 MC-CAN LINERS
08/13/01 PKM-DUST MASK/LINERS/T
08/07/01 PKCHB-TOWELS/TISSUE/SO
08/13/01 PKCP-CAN LINERS
07/19/01 PKDBC-TOWELS/TISSUE/LI
08/24/01 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVC
08/08/01 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVC
22.32
22.32
239.08
239.08
325.00
325.00
136,630.23
136,630.23
7,191.07
7,191.07
550.00
550.00
1,100.00
32.55
16.28
32.55
109.69
48.83
1,184.82
1,184.82
21.70
5,880.65
733.62
1,405.08
1,405.08
43.40
59.68
103.08
43.40
103.08
12,408.31
51.89
397.03
116.29
97.59
818.59
1,481.39
52.80
1,536.51
1,589.31
---_____--n_____--------------------------------------------
Page, 14
0 chklst
08;30/2001 12,38,27
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 15
Check
Date
Vendor
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~= == ~= = === = = ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = ==== = = = = === = ~ ~~~~~~== = = ===== == =~===== == = ==~~~~ = ==== = == = = = = ~ ~ ~ == = = = = = = = = =~~== = = ==
~ = = ==~~= = = ==~ ~=
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~--~ ~UU~ uuu~~ --~ ~ ~ u u uu ~ u ~
Inv. Date Description
~~~--uuuu~----~u~ u~u~u~
260.42
162089 08/31/01 004910
Voucher,
162090 08/31/01 004963
Voucher,
162091 08/31/01 004981
Voucher,
162092 08/31/01 005016
Voucher,
162093 08/31/01 005019
Voucher,
162094 08/31/01 005025
Voucher,
162095 08/31/01 005033
Voucher,
162096 08/31/01 005091
Voucher,
162097 08/31/01 005098
Voucher,
162098 08/31/01 005113
Voucher,
162099 08/31/01 005161
Voucher,
162100 08/31/01 005180
Voucher,
162101 08/31/01 005213
Voucher,
162102 08/31/01 005302
Voucher,
162103 08/31/01 005313
Voucher,
D
--I- ~ ~ ~u~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
FILETEX LLC
Bank Code, key
01~514
01~491
SOUND PUBLISHING INC
Bank Code, key
7052
08/22/01 CDA~COLOR LASER LABELS
07/29/01 CDA~COLOR CODED LABELS
08/13/01 PKRCS~PRINTING FALL/01
SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Bank Code, key
PS~SEP14~l 08/27 /01 PS~EXPLORERS COMPETITI
WESTERN METAL ARTS COMPANY
Bank Code, key
01~2458
08/01/01 PKRCS~22GA ETCH LOGOS
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST IN 20131435~0 08/14/01 SWM~SAW CONCRETE RENTA
Bank Code, key 20234490~0 08/19/01 SWM~TRACTOR BACKHOE RE
20349889~0 08/22/01 SWM~SAW CONCRETE RENTA
PCCI
Bank Code, key
80101-A
80101
RITTER VEGETATION SERVICE
Bank Code, key
358
362
LANDS DREAM
Bank Code, key
141503
BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO S 238841
Bank Code, key 239214
239155
239474
239640
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR MC~TRACY
Bank Code, key
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC
Bank Code, key
86687
CRISIS MANAGEMENT CONSULTIN 01~22
Bank Code, key
FIFE PRINTING
Bank Code, key
13672
RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC 3143
Bank Code, key
SHRED~IT WESTERN WASHINGTON 10562690
Bank Code, key
~u~~~~~~
08/01/01 PKRLS~JANITORIAL SVCS
08/01/01 PKCHB~JANITORIAL SVCS
07/27 /01 PWS~NOXIOUS WEED CONTR
08/11/01 PKM~BPA KNAPWEED SPRAY
08/12/01 PKM~PINE PRUNING,DBC
07/24/01 PS~TRANS SVC/LOF,M4302
07/31/01 PS~LOF,M68935
07/30/01 PS~REPAIR EGR CODES,M9
08/07 /01 PS~EMISSIONS/IGN WIRE/
08/13/01 PS~OEM MASTER CYLINDER
08/20/01 MC~JUDICIAL CONF FEE
08/08/01 CDHS~MEMBER DUES, YNTEM
08/03/01 PWA~EMER MGMT CONSULT I
08/08/01 MC~PRINTING SERVICES
08/22/01 PWS~ROW LANDSCAPE MAIN
08/22/01 PS~SHREDDING SERVICE
u ~ UU~~-- U ~----
94.00
166.42
5,579.64
5,579.64
240.00
240.00
271.08
271.08
81.91
253.16
60.06
395.13
915.00
1,796.00
2,711.00
5,836.16
868.80
6,704.96
2,176.00
2,176.00
223.51
18.99
79.57
310.31
339.67
972.05
95.00
95.00
325.00
325.00
1,750.00
1,750.00
237.62
237.62
12,252.36
12,252.36
174.90
174.90
~u ~u~ ~ ~~--~ ~u~ UU~U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~u ~ ~
Page, 15
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,28
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 16
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
uuuu_-
----------_uu
162104 08/31/01 005321
Voucher,
162105 08/31/01 005326
Voucher,
162106 08/31/01 005335
Voucher'
162107 08/31/01 005341
Voucher,
162108 08/31/01 005380
Voucher,
162109 08/31/01 005388
Voucher,
162110 08/31/01 005392
Voucher,
162111 08/31/01 005399
Voucher,
162112 08/31/01 005421
Voucher,
162113 08/31/01 005501
Voucher,
162114 08/31/01 005561
Voucher,
162115 08/31/01 005568
Voucher,
162116 08/31/01 005587
Voucher,
162117 08/31/01 005622
Voucher,
Inv. Date Description
08/06/01 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES
Bank Code, key
KING COUNTY OFFICE OF PUBLI APRIL 2001 08/06/01 MC-PUBLIC DEFENSE SCRE
Bank Code, key JUNE 2001 08/06/01 MC-PUBLIC DEFENSE SCRE
7919308
ECO NORTHWEST
Bank Code, key
3855
DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA
Bank Code, key
CA18592FW
CA21309FW
PIQUETTE, JOANN
Bank Code, key
OCT3-JUL7
PURE WATER CORPORATION
Bank Code, key
139720
140558
140505
139694
14 0524
13 9734
139700
139680
140539
WAYNE INVESTIGATIONS
Bank Code, key
0013
DYNA SYSTEMS
Bank Code, key
10363818
BARGER, KENNETH
Bank Code, key
CA21523FW
CA15157FW
07/31/01 CDPL-CFW MARKET ANALYS
08/10/01 MC- INTERPRETER, CA18592
08/25/01 MC- INTERPRETER, CA21309
08/16/01 PRCS-REIM FILM/PHOTOS
07/31/01
07/31/01
07/31/01
07/31/01
07/31/01
07/31/01
07/31/01
07/31/01
07/31/01
PKCHB-WATER/COOLER REN
MC-WATER/COOLER RENTAL
PS-WATER/COOLER RENTAL
PKCP-WATER/COOLER RENT
PKM-WATER/COOLER RENTA
PKRCS-WATER/COOLER REN
PKDBC-WATER/COOLER REN
PKKFT-WATER/COOLER REN
PKRLS-WATER/COOLER REN
08/14/01 COB-LEGAL PROCESS SERV
07/27/01 PKM-SHOP SUPPLIES
07/30/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA21523
08/02/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA15157
ANDREWS, AMY
Bank Code, key
CA120094FW 08/06/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA20094
CA21761/62 08/17/01 MC-INTERPRETER, CA21761
CA12021FW 08/10/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA12021
NATIONAL TACTICAL OFFICER'S 6374
Bank Code, key
KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DIVIS 200606
Bank Code, key 200607
08/17/01 PS-CONF FEE,G WILSON
08/03/01 PWS-MISC SUPPLIES
08/03/01 SWM-MATERIALS/SUPPLIES
AVAYA INC
Bank Code, key
2710585099 08/12/01 MSTEL-SYS MAINT
CHELAN COUNTY TREASURER'S
Bank Code, key
7272
-~--------------_u_--_u__u_-
~
07/12/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES{JUNE}
-_uuuu__u- ----------u_---u
45.83
45.83
265.40
170.40
435.80
9,082.50
9,082.50
110.00
80.00
190.00
28.63
28.63
196.93
17.14
134.92
47.11
26.77
7.51
65.40
22.47
20.35
538.60
340.00
340.00
311.53
311.53
50.00
40.00
90.00
40.00
40 00
40.00
120.00
500.00
500.00
434.35
1,026.44
1,460.79
1,986.91
1,986.91
12,912.00
12,912.00
-----_uu_-----_u-
Page, 16
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,28
""
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 17
Check
Date
Vendor
=== = = = = = = ==== = = = = = == === === = === = = ======== ===== = = = == = = = == = ========= ===== = ===== = === = = = == = = === == = = == = = = == = = = = = = = = == === = = =
= == = == = = = = = == = =
Inv.Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
------------- --------------- --- --------------
- - ------ ------- ----- ----- ------ ----- -- -- ------
162118 08/31/01 005626
Voucher,
162119 08/31/01 005656
Voucher,
162120 08/31/01 005657
Voucher,
162121 08/31/01 005674
Voucher,
162122 08/31/01 005703
Voucher,
162123 08/31/01 005817
Voucher,
162124 08/31/01 005820
Voucher,
162125 08/31/01 005826
Voucher,
162126 08/31/01 005828
Voucher,
162127 08/31/01 005904
Voucher,
162128 08/31/01 005928
Voucher,
162129 08/31/01 005931
Voucher,
162130 08/31/01 005932
Voucher,
162131 08/31/01 005934
Voucher,
162132 08/31/01 005940
Voucher,
CANDLE POWER INC
Bank Code, key
81036
08/03/01 PS-NARVA HALOGEN 6V
38.65
JIM'S DETAIL SHOP
Bank Code, key
10314F
38.65
08/08/01 PS-DETAIL SVCS #48624
151.23
151.23
DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES
Bank Code, key
ABOOO03199 07/31/01 PS-AUTOTRACKXP,JULY SV
300.00
300.00
MERCADO, ANNA M
Bank Code, key
CA21353FW 08/07/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA21353
CA21189FW 08/14/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA21189
CA21 761 /62 08/21/01 MC- INTERPRETER, CA21761
AUG24-AUG2 08/28/01 MC-INTERPRETER,AUG24-2
70.00
60.00
90.00
110.00
330.00
SAFEWAY STORE #3501
Bank Code, key
140467
140400
276956
276955
08/15/01 PKRCS-FOOD, SPEC OLYMPI
08/14/01 PKRCS-CHARCOAL/ICE, aPE
08/17/01 PKRCS-FOOD,KARAOKE NIG
08/17/01 PKRCS-FOOD,KARAOKE NIG
08/07/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES{JULY}
08/14/01 PS-CREDIT,JAIL SVCS {J
19.75
19.54
8.60
19.91
67.80
CITY OF FIFE
Bank Code, key
003932
CMO03932
19,719.00
-189.00
19,530.00
FASTSIGNS
Bank Code, key
1839
07/05/01 PS-GRAPHIC GRAPHICS #6
239.36
239.36
OVSIPYAN, MIKHAIL V
Bank Code, key
CA19963/64 08/22/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA19963
40.00
40.00
MARINE VIEW SAND & GRAVEL L 506
Bank Code, key
SPORTS RACK
Bank Code, key
0015389
08/03/01 PWS-ASPHALT DISPOSAL
117.60
ATD-AMERICAN CO
Bank Code, key
610941
117.60
07/24/01 PS-CLASS IV HITCH 8115
2,855.19
JUN6-JUL5
MAYER, JENNIFER
Bank Code, key
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLl 0020596
Bank Code, key
K P TRANSLATION SERVICES
Bank Code, key
IA53956FW
2,855.19
07/10/01 PS-CONFERENCE CHAIRS
912.23
RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL
Bank Code, key
RU-7393
912.23
08/13/01 PRCS-REIM PHONE CALLS
54.60
54.60
07/31/01 PS-HOMICIDE INVEST COU
990.00
990.00
08/17/01 MC-INTERPRETER,IA53956
40.00
40.00
08/03/01 PS-ADVANCED TASERS
12,602.04
12,602.04
- -;ï=T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - ------ -- - - - -------- - - -- ----- - -- -------- --- ---- - u----- - -- - ---- - - - - - -- --- - - - -- - - - --- - - - -
--- - ---~;;~; -~;
~
'2;ij.
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,28
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 18
= = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == = = = = == = ====== = = = = ==== = = === = = = = == = === = = == ===== = = = == == = == = = == == = = === = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = === = = = == = = = == = = = = == =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
a-a_u uuuu - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - u - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _u_u_u _uu_u uu_--_u_uu_uuu --_uuuuu_- uu_uu__uuu-
162133 08/31/01 005948 DGG TASER 40116 08/01/01 PS-RECHG BATTERIES 692.00 692.00
Voucher, Bank Code: key
162134 08/31/01 005949 S 0 TECH/SPECIAL OPERATIONS 568 08/14/01 PS-TASER HOLSTERS 942.00 942.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162135 08/31/01 005955 PIERCE COUNTY AUDITOR PS-AGRMT F 08/13/01 PS-FILING FEES 16.00 16.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162136 08/31/01 005957 CHAREUNSAP, ROSE CA13820FW 08/07/01 MC-INTERPRETER:CA13820 61.60 61. 60
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162137 08/31/01 005974 BLANKENSHIP EQUIPMENT REPAI 16264 08/09/01 PWSWR-REBUILT TOW CART 2,393.60 2,393.60
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162138 08/31/01 005976 GOVJOB. COM 12-1237 07/26/01 MSHR-AD: POLICE OFFICER 125.00 125.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162139 08/31/01 005978 JACKSON, LAURIE PS-AUG 13T 08/15/01 PS-REIM:SHOE ALLOWANCE 97.90 97.90
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162140 08/31/01 005980 AMERICAN TROPHIES & ENGRAVI 26084 OS/22/01 PKRCS-SIGNS: ART DISPLA 479.26 479.26
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162141 08/31/01 005981 HR DIRECT 15-2922286 08/13/01 PS-FED LABOR LAW POSTE 127.81 127.81
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162142 08/31/01 005982 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT C 4866084 RI 08/08/01 PKM-SECURITY CAMERA/AC 103.54 103.54
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162143 08/31/01 005983 TODAY'S CAREERS 29028 08/06/01 MSHR-AD:SWM ENGR TECH 294.40
Voucher: Bank Code: key 29305 08/13/01 MSHR-AD:SWM ENGR TECH 294.40 588.80
162144 08/31/01 005991 WA STATE-DEPT OF LICENSING ACCT 30456 07/26/01 MC-PUBLIC DISCLOSURE A 25.00 25.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162145 08/31/01 700599 GREENACRES LEARNING CENTER 86398 08/16/01 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code: key
162146 08/31/01 700654 UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND C1702R8265 08/22/01 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DP 99.54 99.54
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162147 08/31/01 701249 ENCHANTED PARKS INC 02-39430 08/20/01 PW-REFUND 99-102126-00 8,601.25 8,601.25
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162148 08/31/01 701259 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS I C1688R8159 08/22/01 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DP 77.03 77.03
Voucher, Bank Code, key
---~- --- --- ----- - -- -------_u_------_u_---------_uu_----_u__u_--_u_u_--_u_---_u - ----------_u_--------_u_uu- -----
N Page: 18
~
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,28
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 19
= == = = = = == == = = = = = = = == ==== = = = = == = = ==== === === = ==== === = == = = = == = ====== = ========== = = = = ====== ====== = == = = = = = = === = = = = = = = == == = =
=== = = == = == = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
~d~UU UUUU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~uuu ~ ~ ~ u ~ u ~ ~ ~ --~u ~ u uuu u~~ ~~~--u~ ~ ~ u~ ~ ~ ~~UU~ u~u~~~~u~u~ ~uu~uu~--uu~
162149 08/31/01 701353 PYUNG AN PRESBYTERIAN CHURC 86404 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162150 08/31/01 701356 HONG, KEON PYO 87259 08/24/01 PKRCS~REFUND CLASS FEE 30.00 30.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162151 08/31/01 701359 SAFE WORKS LLC 86401 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162152 08/31/01 701439 ST NICHOLAS MONTESSORI SCHO 86396 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162153 08/31/01 70155;> WAL MART 86406 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162154 08/31/01 701554 BANK & OFFICE INTERIORS 86407 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162155 08/31/01 701666 FIRE SYSTEMS WEST 86394 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162156 08/31/01 702010 COLVIN, WANDA L JUROR49026 08/24/01 MC~JUROR FEE' 8/21~23 11.38 11.38
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162157 08/31/01 702438 PARK, CRYSTAL 84759~R 07 /11/01 PKRCS~REFUND CLASS FEE 176.00 176.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162158 08/31/01 702496 AYAR, SAYED 02~41884 08/15/01 PW~REFUND 70% CASH BON 350.00 350.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162159 08/31/01 702497 POTTER, JAMES 01~01~0912 08/21/01 MSRM~CLAIM 01~01~091~2 248.02 248.02
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162160 08/31/01 702498 LEE, MIA 86395 08/16/01 PKRCS~REFUND CLASS FEE 28.00 28.00
Vouchee Bank Code, key
162161 08/31/01 702499 SOOK, SIM 86388 08/16/01 PKRCS~REFUND CLASS FEE 8.12
Voucher, Bank Code, key 86389 08/16/01 PKRCS~REFUND CLASS FEE 8.12 16.24
162162 08/31/01 702500 WINCO FOODS 02~37726 08/14/01 PW~70% RELEASE, 99~1000 6,780.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key 02~38861 08/14/01 PW~70% RELEASE, 99~1000 27,385.00 34,165.00
162163 08/31/01 702501 HARPER, MICHAEL S 01~33115 08/20/01 PS~REFUND SEIZED MONEY 531.00 531.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162164 08/31/01 702502 PHINNEY RIDGE LUTHERAN CHUR C1706R8299 08/22/01 PKDBC~CANCEL RENTAL 10 150.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key C1706R8230 08/22/01 PKDBC~CANCEL RENTAL 10 1,000.00 1,150.00
\\
\
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ - - ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - - ~ - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - - ~ - ~
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~~;~; ~ ~;
0 chklst Check List Page, 20
08/30/2001 12,38,28 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
= = = = = = == = ==== = = = = == =========== = ====== = ==== = = === ======= ==== === ===== === = = = = = ============= == = = = == = === = = = == = = = = = = = === = = = = = = == =
= = = = = = == ==
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
~~~h~~~ ~h~hh hhhhh~~~~h~hhhh~_~~~hhh h~~~~~h~ h~~---- ----hh------~--h~-- ----~--~~~----~ ~ -- --h----~~ ~~-- ~
162165 08/31/01 702503 LEGAL FOUNDATION OF WA C1711R8185 08/22/01 PKDBC~REFUND RENTAL DP 500.91 500.91
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162166 08/31/01 702504 GIFTED LEADERSHIP CON FERENC C1616R7974 08/22/01 PKDBC~REFUND RENTAL DP 49.10 49.10
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162167 08/31/01 702505 TURCOTTE, STEVEN 87258 08/24/01 PKRCS~REFUND CLASS FEE 36.40 36.40
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162168 08/31/01 702506 MATSUI, CAROL 87257 08/24/01 PKRCS~REFUND CLASS FEE 36.00 36.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162169 08/31/01 702507 FEDERAL WAY CHURCH OF CHRIS 86392 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162170 08/31/01 702508 MARINE VIEW PRESBYTERIAN 86393 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162171 08/31/01 702509 MILLER, LARRY 86399 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162172 08/31/01 702510 EVANS, DON 86400 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162173 08/31/01 702511 CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICE 86403 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162174 08/31/01 702512 LABELING SERVICES INC 86405 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162175 08/31/01 702513 ROMERO, LELICIA 86390 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162176 08/31/01 702514 WELLS, DAVE 86391 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162177 08/31/01 702515 SUNRISE UNITED METHODIST 86408 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162178 08/31/01 702516 OKINAWAN CLUB OF WA STATE 86397 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
162179 08/31/01 702517 SLAVIC GOSPEL CHURCH 86402 08/16/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
16218008/31/01 702518 TECTON CORPORATION 87260 08/24/01 PKRLS~REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
~ ~ -n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -
N Page: 20
}.)
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12:38:28
3<.
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 21
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
nn__u-U_---
162181 08/31/01 702519
Voucher:
162182 08/31/01 702520
Voucher:
162183 08/31/01 702521
Voucher:
162184 08/31/01 702522
Voucher:
162185 08/31/01 702523
Voucher:
162186 08/31/01 702524
Voucher:
162187 08/31/01 702525
Voucher:
162188 08/31/01 702526
Voucher:
162189 08/31/01 702527
Voucher:
162190 08/31/01 702528
Voucher:
162191 08/31/01 702529
Voucher:
162192 08/31/01 702930
Voucher:
162193 08/31/01 702931
Voucher:
162194 08/31/01 702932
Voucher:
162195 08/31/01 702933
Voucher:
162196 08/31/01 702934
Voucher:
BACH, JULIE
Bank Code: key
GAVRILOVICI, IOSEF
Bank Code: key
ASH, MARGARET E
Bank Code: key
CAMPBELL, ROGER 0
Bank Code: key
CAVERLY, JULIE LYNN
Bank Code: key
DAVID, SHANNON RENE
Bank Code: key
DEETHARDT, PAUL J
Bank Code: key
DERLYUK, NATASHA
Bank Code: key
DONA, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Bank Code: key
FIRTH, KRISANN B
Bank Code: key
FRANCO, MAIZIE A
Bank Code: key
GOLESH, CATHERINE A
Bank Code: key
GREEN, JANEINE E
Bank Code: key
HALL, PAMELA A
Bank Code: key
HARWELL, MELODY L
Bank Code: key
HELLER, TERYL A
Bank Code: key
1\
- _~n- - - - - - - - - n - - - - - nnn n- - - n-
Invoice
Inv.Date Description
87261
08/24/01 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE
nnnn___--______n- --------------- --____u_n-__n_-
50.00
50.00
nnn___-
03-35983
08/28/01 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO
JUROR49005 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49019 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49021 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49031 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR70252 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49033 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49034 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49041 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49043 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49048 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49050 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49053 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49055 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
JUROR49057 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE: 8/21-23
50.00
50.00
14.83
14.83
11.38
11.38
13.45
13 .45
12.07
12.07
11.38
11.38
13 .45
13 .45
10.69
10.69
11.38
11.38
11.38
11.38
12.07
12.07
12.76
12.76
12.76
12.76
14 .14
14 .14
11.38
11.38
______nnnn-
_nn- ---- u - _n - - - n- n _u - - - --
Page: 21
0 chklst
08/30/2001 12,38,28
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 22
~ ~ ~ = ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = ~ = ~ = =
= = = = = = = = ~ = ~ = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = ~ = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
_-__uh ---_u_-_u_--_u_-_uuuuuuu_- -_u_uu- _uuu- uuuuuuuuuuu _uu_--------- ___Uh_U--_uu-
162197 08/31/01 702935 JONAS, EVA JUROR49067 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 12.07 12.07
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162198 08/31/01 702936 JONES, ROGER N JUROR49068 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 12.07 12,07
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162199 08/31/01 702937 KANTA, GEORGINE LOIS JUROR49069 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 10.69 10.69
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162200 08/31/01 702938 KILCUP, JAMES D JUROR49071 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 13.45 13 .45
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162201 08/31/01 702939 MANDELAS, KELLY J JUROR49085 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 13 .45 13 .45
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162202 08/31/01 702940 MCCANNA, CHARLES W JUROR49088 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 12.76 12.76
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162203 08/31/01 702941 NASSET, BONNIE J JUROR49098 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 14.14 14.14
Voucher, Bank Code' key
162204 08/31/01 702942 NORRIS, PATRICIA C JUROR49102 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 11.38 11.38
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162205 08/31/01 702943 RAE, JOHNNIE R JUROR49116 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 11.38 11.38
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162206 08/31/01 702944 REDFORD, WANDA A JUROR70294 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 13 .45 13 .45
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162207 08/31/01 702945 RISTINE, GERALD B JUROR49121 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 12.76 12.76
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162208 08/31/01 702946 ROBERTS, MARGARET INEZ JUROR49122 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 14.14 14 .14
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162209 08/31/01 702947 ROCKWELL, JOSEPH H JUROR49122 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 13 .45 13.45
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162210 08/31/01 702948 SIVERLY, LISA M JUROR49135 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 10.69 10.69
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162211 08/31/01 702949 SMITH, JASSON JUROR49136 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 41.05 41.05
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162212 08/31/01 702950 SMITH, TIMOTHY EDWARD JUROR49137 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23 13 .45 13 .45
Voucher, Bank Code, key
-:J'::J- - -- - - - - --- ---------______H_____uu_--_u_u__u_U--_U_U_U_h_U____---U__h__U____h___H______----- _____h_--U __h-
~ Page, 22
'-'=-
0 chklst
08/30/200112,38,29
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 23
==== = == == = ==== === == = ============== = = = = = ===== = = = === = = === = ==== = = = = = = == = === = = == =============== === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = =
= === = = = = = = = = =
SOBUS, LESLIE H
Bank Code, key
Invoice Inv.Date Description
---------- --- - _u---- - ----- -----
JUROR49138 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23
JUROR49149 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23
JUROR49161 08/24/01 MC-JUROR FEE, 8/21-23
Amount Paid
Check Total
Check
Date
Vendor
--------------
--------------- ..----------"----
162213 08/31/01 702951
Voucher,
162214 08/31/01 702952
Voucher,
162215 08/31/01 702953
Voucher,
288 Checks in this report
11.38
11.38
TIPPER, MICHAEL T
Bank Code, key
12.07
12.07
WHIPPLE, MARCELLE M
Bank Code, key
14 .14
14 .14
-_u-----_u_-----
Total Checks,
787,217.01
;ì
N----------------------------
~
- ---- - ------ - - - ---- --- --- - - - - - ----- --- - - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - - ----
Page' 23
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,08
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 1
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = == = = = == = = = === = ==== = = = === ======== = = = = = = = ===
= == = = = == = = = = == = = = == == = = = = = === = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
u_----- ----uu -_u__uu_----______H----_U__U-- u_--_uu _--__H- u___uu_H_U----_U -----_uu_---- ---u_uu_-_uu-
162216 09/10/01 004088 EDEN SYSTEMS USER CONFERENC MSF- KRAUS 09/10/01 MSF-CONF FEE , THO KRAUS 475.00 475.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162217 09/14/01 000029 KING BELLMARK OF PUGET SOliN 019715 08/28/01 MSF-ADDRESS STAMP 40.97 40.97
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162218 09/14/01 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY 030264 08/21/01 PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER 14.65
Voucher, Bank Code, key 030472 08/28/01 PS-LEATHER GLOVES 252.07
030095 08/13/01 PKM-SAFETY GLASSES 184.45 451.17
162219 09/14/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 0.00
"VOID" Voucher, Bank Code, key
162220 09/14/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 129325 08/28/01 PWS-WATER TEST GAUGE 14.87
Voucher, Bank Code, key 128789 08/16/01 PKM-REEL HOSE/NOZZLE 110.61
129094 08/22/01 PKM-PRE-MIX CONCRETE 12.99
128848 08/17/01 PKM-GALV COUPLING/ELL 15.10
129151 08/23/01 PKM-SUPERMEND EPOXY 16 .15
129316 08/28/01 PKM-SDS BIT/SCREWS/BOL 11.94
129374 08/29/01 PKM-CAUTION TAPE 12.51
129423 08/30/01 PKM-C BATTERY/STAPLES 5.40
129579 09/04/01 PKM-PRE-MIX CONCRETE 10.83
129624 09/04/01 PKM-CEDAR BOARDS 19.82
129602 09/04/01 PKCHB-PUTTY KNIFE/ACUS 10.33
129139 08/23/01 SWM-BATTERIES/SCR EXTR 17.39
129429 08/30/01 SWM-FIB/ALUM EXT POLE 17.57
129492 08/31/01 PWS-CABLE TIES 2.92
129591 09/04/01 PWS-CAULKING MATERIALS 2.54
129585 09/04/01 PWS-CART MAGIC SEAL CR 3.91
129586 09/04/01 PWS-CART MAGIC SEAL CR 3.91
129581 09/04/01 PWS-COBALT DRILL BIT 6.26
129700 09/05/01 PKM-MAGNETIC BIT HOLDE 8.80
129647 09/05/01 PKM-SDS BITS 18.58
129650 09/05/01 PKM-PVC ADAPTOR/ELL 10.60
129654 09/05/01 PKM-HEX CAP/FIN NUT/WA 19.45
129810 09/07/01 PWS-EAR PLUGS 48.96
129760 09/06/01 PWS-TAPE MEASURE/COUPL 5.82
129513 08/31/01 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 47.15 454.41
162221 09/14/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 699-699-10 08/20/01 PWS-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.47
Voucher, Bank Code, key 311-112-70 08/22/01 PKDBC/KFT-NATL GAS 382.74
727-469-10 08/22/01 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY 1,761.88
062-691-10 08/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 44.28
183-469-10 08/29/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 11 7. 94
131-066-10 08/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 11,850.88
190-977-00 08/29/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 140.36
252-150-20 08/29/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 92.44
'ì 342-691-10 08/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 93.97
- - ~ - uu - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - -_u - - - - - - -_u- - - - - - - - - u - - ----_u- - - - u_u - - - u_- u - --- _uu - - _H- - u - u- -- - - - - - -_u- - - - - - - - _u u_- -
- - - u_-
~ Page, 1
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,10
'"
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
Check
Date
Vendor
~ = = = ~ = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = === ===== = = = = = = = ======= = = ====== = = = ==~=== = = = = == = === = === = = == = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~
Check Total
n______n_____-______nnn____---- ______n_-
Invoice
162221 09/14/01 000051
162222 09/14/01 000056
Voucher,
162223 09/14/01 000063
Voucher,
162224 09/14/01 000075
Voucher,
16222509/14/01 000089
Voucher,
162226 09/14/01 000096
Voucher,
PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC
SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER
Bank Code, key
CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE
Bank Code, key
352-691-10
442-691-10
472-400-10
536-673-10
638-448-10
657-289-00
736-169-10
738-448-10
904-388-10
996-289-00
112-722-10
128-255-39
141-467-10
177-437-10
233-930-20
241-985-10
373-087-10
458-148-10
504-368-10
525-940-20
733-930-20
925-940-20
993-440-20
24520
33402052
33424460
33519250
33530660
33442190
33503450
33560480
Inv. Date Description
Amount Paid
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/29/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
09/04/01
08/30/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
09/07/01
08/20/01
09/06/01
09/06/01
09/07/01
09/07/01
09/06/01
09/06/01
09/06/01
09/07/01
09/07/01
09/07/01
08/27/01
____nnnn_h_--nn n_n_--___nn ___nn--_n__nn
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT- STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
PWT-STREET
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
LIGHTING
25.80
25.80
69.24
232.20
78.19
6.04
116.66
58.64
106.43
113.47
182.34
539.94
192.06
105.16
124.97
150.52
124.97
248.93
36.96
177.80
149.24
157.13
147.51
CDB-CR, INV
CDB-OFFICE
CDB-OFFICE
CDB-OFFICE
CDB-OFFICE
PWA-OFFICE
CDB-OFFICE
08/29/01 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES
331.73
08/20/01
08/15/01
08/24/01
08/24/01
08/16/01
08/23/0è
08/28/01
33402050
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
-4.30
33.41
20.81
33.70
40.41
403.84
60.31
420708
899802
822402
2814401
0000101
3033601
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES I 047-484825 08/27/01 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME
Bank Code, key 047-204057 09/02/01 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME
19.78
1,012.91
26.25
NEWS TRIBUNE
Bank Code, key
LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
Bank Code, key
08/19/01 PS-13 WK SUBSCRIPTION
08/22/01 PKM-WATER SERVICE
08/22/01 PKM-WATER SERVICE
08/22/01 PKM-WATER SERVICE
08/22/01 PKM-WATER SERVICE
08/28/01 PKM-WATER SERVICE
1,599.78
1,738.04
1,152.01
35.80
194.48
~ - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - --- - - - n_- -- - - n-- - -- - - - - - - - n- -- - - - -- -- -- - - - - - -- --- - - - n- --- - -
------
~
(continued)
17,659.96
331.73
588.18
1,032.69
26.25
4,720.11
Page, 2
",'
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,10
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 3
= = = = = = = === = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == === === = == = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = === = = = === = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = == =
= == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv, Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
U_Un ____un uuuu_uh__uuuuuu__h___U uuuu_- --_uu- --_u__uu_-_u_uu- _u_uU_uu_- u_u_uu_uu_u
162227 09/14/01 000097 EDEN SYSTEMS INC 11427 08/15/01 MSDP-PROJECT MANAGE MEN 656,25
Voucher, Bank Code, key 11428 08/15/01 MSDP-TRAVEL/OTHER EXPE 8,97 665,22
162228 09/14/01 000101 PETTY CASH 011611 09/10/01 CDA-REIM PETTY CASH 39,58 39,58
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162229 09/14/01 000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC 108231132 08/24/01 PS-AIRFARE,G WILSON 296,58
Voucher, Bank Code, key 108291033 08/29/01 PS-AIRFARE,E BURNS 217,50 514,08
162230 09/14/01 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12617 08/20/01 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 391.37
Voucher, Bank Code, key 12632 09/05/01 PS-DUPLICATE KEYS 63,42 454,79
162231 09/14/01 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISIO 1062512 08/16/01 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MA 6,132,47 6,132,47
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162232 09/14/01 000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE TRA CHECK #176 08/13/01 PS-COACHING/COUNSELING 287,00
Voucher, Bank Code, key CHECK #176 08/15/01 PS-SPILLMAN USERS CONF 179,10
CHECK #176 08/22/01 PS-COMPOSITE DRAWING T 434,40
CHECK #176 09/06/01 PS-BIKE CRASH INVEST T 184,00
CHECK #177 09/06/01 PWA-APWA CONFERENCE 141,00
CHECK #177 09/06/01 PWA-APWA CONFERENCE 141. 00
CHECK #177 09/12/01 PS-NTOA TACTICAL CLASS 204.00 1,570,50
162233 09/14/01 000152 ELECTRO PRODUCTS/CABLE CO 96822 09/04/01 MSDP-DROP CABLES 336.43 336,43
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162234 09/14/01 000201 KINKO' S INC 5151000587 09/05/01 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 544.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key 5151000585 08/22/01 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS 104,99
5151000586 08/29/01 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 859.52
5151000579 07/19/01 CDPL-PRINTING SERVICES 52,52
5151000585 08/21/01 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 13.93 1,574.96
162235 09/14/01 000202 QWEST 253-661-98 06/16/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 50,79
Voucher, Bank Code, key 253-661-98 07/16/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 49,82
253-661-98 08/16/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 50,63
206-T02-86 07/16/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 1,040,18
206-T02-86 08/16/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 559,52
253-630-15 08/29/01 MC-FAX MACHINE CHARGES 20,97 1,771-91
162236 09/14/01 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 5-936-7361 08/31/01 MS/PS-DELIVERY SERVICE 72.00 72,00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162237 09/14/01 000286 METROCALL 8702325 08/25/01 MSTEL-PAGER SERVICE 12.49 12.49
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162238 09/14/01 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO 375402 08/20/01 PWSCIP-TITLE REPORTS 44.10
Voucher, Bank Code: key 371934 08/20/01 PWSCIP-TITLE REPORTS 44.10
374678 08/20/01 PWSCIP-TITLE REPORTS 44.10
ìl 371932 08/20/01 PWSCIP-TITLE REPORTS 98,90
I -- - - - - - _____-h_U---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---
~ Page,
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,10
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 4
Check
Date
Vendor
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"""" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"""" "== = = ~ = = = = = ~ ~""= = = = = = = = ~~~===" == = = = = ~= = = = = = = == = = ~ = ~ ~ = = = === = = = = ~ ~ ~"""""" = ~ = ~ ~
~ = ~ ~== ~ = = = = =" ~ ~ ~ ~ == = = = ~ = ~
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
----------------------____--_nn_n ____n___-
162238 09/14/01 000315
162239 09/14/01 000328
Voucher,
162240 09/14/01 000340
Voucher,
162241 09/14/01 000343
Voucher,
162242 09/14/01 000379
Voucher,
162243 09/14/01 000414
Voucher,
162244 09/14/01 000428
Voucher,
162245 09/14/01 000432
Voucher,
PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO
ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA)
Bank Code, key
369047
0084943
0084944
Inv. Date Description
---_--_u_nnnn--_- _un--nn__n nnn_--_u_nh-
664.26
(continued)
895.46
08/20/01 SWM-TITLE REPORTS
08/31/01 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE
08/31/01 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVIC 2001080222 09/05/01 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE
Bank Code, key
ELEPHANT CAR WASH
Bank Code, key
SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
Bank Code, key
CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC
Bank Code, key
WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASSOC
Bank Code, key
TAYLOR RENTAL
Bank Code '. key
2,JUL 2001 07/31/01 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE
CP 364
5052
5053
5054
5055
5056
5057
5058
5059
5060
5061
5062
5063
5064
5065
5066
5067
5068
5069
5070
5105
5124
RCS-FABER
RCS-MAYER
08/28/01 PWSWR-RECYCLE BROCHURE
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
09/04/01
08/29/01
08/31/01
PKDBC-WA ST TRAIL LAWY
PKDBC-WEYERHAEUSER STR
PKDBC-VA PUGET SOUND
PKDBC-WA STATE LIBRARY
PKDBC-EXECUTIVE ETHICS
PKDBC-NO PACIFIC INST
PKDBC-NW WASHINGTON SY
PKDBC-LEADERSHIP INSTI
PKDBC- LUTHERAN COMM SV
PKDBC-ARCH OF SEATTLE
PKDBC-LEGION OF MARY
PKDBC-AVANTA
PKDBC-WEYERHAEUSER INF
PKDBC-PORT OF SEATTLE
PKDBC-VINEYARD CHRISTI
PKDBC- FLU SCHOOL OF BU
PKDBC-VA PUGET SOUND M
PKDBC- VA PUGET SOUND
PKDBC-WORLD VISION
PKDBC-CR, FRANKLIN PIER
PKDBC-BON MARCHE (ADD
08/31/01 PRCS-MEMBER FEE,FABER
09/05/01 PRCS-MID-YR CONF,MAYER
1-91849-05 07/26/01 PWS-LECTURN/SPKR RENTA
DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONE 2002
Bank Code, key 2003
2010
2019
Ì\ 2023
1
- N- - - -- - -- - - --- - - h- - - - - - - - - - - un - n n_n- ----- u-
~
162246 09/14/01 000430
Voucher,
08/24/01 CC-AGENDA SETTING LUNC
08/27/01 CM-MGMT TEAM LUNCH
08/31/01 PS-LUNCH MTG W/CITY MG
09/07/01 CM-AGENDA SETTING LUNC
09/11/01 CM-LUNCH,MTG IN CM OFF
2,108.22
4,278.59
1,120.69
6,386.81
1,120.69
197.26
197.26
1,242.70
1,242.70
204.24
552.48
357.60
916.88
137.16
285.60
1,642.20
4,072.80
325.44
1,604.88
1,856.40
1,346.40
175.44
49.80
568.50
381.05
349.92
46.40
304.56
-829.08
728.30
15,076.97
150.00
50.00
200.00
113.37
113.37
32.90
62.08
35.41
32.29
21.48
184.16
- n - -- __n - _n_- - - - - -- -- nn - - -- - - - - - ---- -- n - ----
Page, 4
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,10
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = == = = = == = == = == = = = = = = = == == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Inv.Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
---------------------- --------------- ------------------
------------------------------------ ----------
162247 09/14/01 000475
Voucher,
162248 09/14/01 000504
Voucher,
162249 09/14/01 000514
Voucher:
162250 09/14/01 000564
Voucher:
162251 09/14/01 000566
Voucher:
162252 09/14/01 000570
Voucher:
162253 09/14/01 000588
Voucher,
162254 09/14/01 000630
Voucher:
162255 09/14/01 000650
Voucher:
162256 09/14/01 000660
Voucher:
162257 09/14/01 000721
Voucher:
162258 09/14/01 000723
Voucher:
162259 09/14/01 000730
Voucher:
CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS
Bank Code: key
ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER
Bank Code: key
WA STATE-STATE REVENUES
Bank Code: key
KING COUNTY PET LICENSE
Bank Code: key
POPICH SIGN COMPANY
Bank Code: key
EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE
Bank Code: key
TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES
Bank Code: key
LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC
Bank Code: key
COASTLINE TRACTOR
Bank Code: key
WOODWORTH & COMPANY INC
Bank Code: key
AMERICAN CONCRETE INC
Bank Code: key
190621
086196
086206
086249
086238
086389
AUG 2001
AUG 2001
32099
(DB 1012975
1013126
1013142
1013139
1013159
1013187
1013134
1013149
08/20/01 PKRLS-ALARM MONITORING
84.74
84.74
08/29/01 PKM-STIHL ROPE ELASTRO
08/29/01 PWS-STIHL SAFETY GLASS
08/30/01 PKM-STENS BELT/TRIM GU
08/30/01 SWM-STIHL LOOP TRIMMER
09/06/01 PWS-STIHL BAR NUT
09/13/01 MSF-REMIT STATE FEES
2.39
9.75
24.78
293.72
2.70
333.34
53,193.73
53,193.73
09/11/01 MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES
735.00
735.00
08/30/01 MSHR-EMPLOYEE NAME PLAT
113.35
113.35
08/16/01
08/22/01
08/23/01
08/23/01
08/23/01
08/24/01
08/22/01
08/23/01
25.01
442.55
618.91
573.35
615.33
13 .32
255.24
29.95
PS-LOF:M4435
PS-LOF/WIRE SET/TRANS
PS-FUEL PUMP/ECM:M4647
PS-FUEL INJECTOR/LOF:M
PS-RADIATOR/TRANS SVC:
PS-TIRE REPAIR:M78298
PS-REPL HEADLIGHT:M932
PS- INSTALL HEADLAMPS/B
2,573.66
008-227-18 08/29/01 PKKFT-FIRE SPRINKLER
008-280-50 08/29/01 PKDBC-WATER SERVICE
005-224-60 08/29/01 PKDBC-WATER SERVICE
55871
55911
12433
3:AGOI-64
0074778
0074814
SOUND RESOURCE MGMT GROUP I FWP- 012
Bank Code: key
ENTRANCO INC
Bank Code: key
34993
34994
46.16
577.17
365.39
988.72
08/22/01 SWM-MEDIUM BARK
08/27/01 SWM-PRO GRO BLEND
07/26/01 MSFLT-REPAIR SLIP CLUT
150.38
44.60
194.98
155.47
155.47
08/30/01 PWS-2001 ASPHALT OVERL
412,055.66
412,055.66
08/28/01 PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES
08/29/01 PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES
08/31/01 PWSWR-SOLID WASTE/RECY
296.14
327.42
623.56
1,496.40
1,496.40
08/24/01 PWSCIP-23RD AVE S RD I
08/24/01 PWSCIP-23RD AVE S RD I
7,920.57
17,947.97
25,868.54
-])- - - - - - - --- - - - - --- -- - - - - - - - ------- - ---- - ---- --- - - -- -------- --- -- ----- - - ----- - - - - ------- ----- ---- - --- ----- ------ - - - - - ------ ;~~~
;--
~
~
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,11
=
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 6
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
Inv. Date Description
----------- ---------- -------- ---
08/27/01 RCS-BOWLING RAMP
--------------
162260 09/14/01 000759
Voucher,
162261 09/14/01 000771
Voucher,
162262 09/14/01 000799
Voucher,
162263 09/14/01 000808
Voucher,
162264 09/14/01 000854
Voucher,
162265 09/14/01 001046
Voucher,
162266 09/14/01 001052
Voucher,
162267 09/14/01 001100
Voucher,
162268 09/14/01 001131
Voucher,
162269 09/14/01 001166
Voucher,
162270 09/14/01 001194
Voucher,
162271 09/14/01 001213
Voucher,
162272 09/14/01 001233
Voucher,
162273 09/14/01 001234
Voucher,
162274 09/14/01 001259
Voucher,
S & S WORLDWIDE, INC
Bank Code, key
3777411
COSTCO/HRS USA
Bank Code, key
7300000209 08/26/01 MSF-JUL30-AUG 24 SUPPL
JET CHEVROLET
Bank Code, key
CTCS48372
CTCS48553
08/28/01 MSFLT-FUEL SEPARATOR,M
09/06/01 MSFLT-REGULATOR/GUIDE,
08/21/01 PKM-LIGHTING SUPPLIES
08/22/01 CDBG-ENGRAVING/NAME PL
08/25/01 PS-CREDIT REPORTS
08/28/01 MSFLT-CAR WASH POLISH
08/31/01 SWM-LUBRICANT
09/04/01 PWS-WORK TOWELS
09/04/01 PWS-MIRROR KIT/SCREWDR
09/07/01 MSFLT-JUMPER CABLES
08/25/01 PWT-ROUNDABOUT DESIGN
08/25/01 PWT-ROUNDABOUT DESIGN
08/31/01 MSFLT-BATTERY/CIRCUIT
08/29/01 MSFLT-BATTERY/CIRCUIT
09/04/01 PRCS-REIM PETTY CASH
AMERICAN HOSE & FITTINGS IN 553697-001 08/23/01 MSFLT-HOSE ASSEMBLY
Bank Code, key
08/28/01 PWS-FENCE REPAIR
A T & T BUSINESS SERVICE
Bank Code, key
0510661494 08/28/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV
0510714612 08/24/01 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV
08/31/01 MSC-HEARING EXAMINER S
09/13/01 MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM
\l
,
- \,pJ- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- ---- -- --- ----- - - - --- -- - -- - - -- - ---- -- - ---
"-
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
Bank Code, key
0346566
D J TROPHY
Bank Code, key
205196A
EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION
Bank Code, key
4394331
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
Bank Code, key
597039
597588
598244
598267
598784
TRANS PO GROUP INC
Bank Code, key
0003036
0003037
EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC 001321
Bank Code, key 001306
PETTY CASH
Bank Code, key
011579
SECOMA FENCE INC
Bank Code, key
2030
MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX ROURKE I 9025-00M
Bank Code, key
KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS F AUG 2001
Bank Code, key
--------------- ------------------
195.36
195.36
936.73
936.73
111.89
333.19
445.08
104.90
104.90
7.07
7.07
30.52
30.52
6.52
6.50
11.96
14.12
39.70
78.80
8,083.48
3,530.15
11,613.63
134.53
322.19
456.72
124.78
124.78
151 21
151.21
388 42
388.42
20.44
24.58
45.02
1,605.19
1,605.19
1,148.78
1,148.78
- - -- ---- - - - -- -- - --- - - - - - -- - - -- -- -- -- - ---- --- - - --- - ----
Page, 6
.""
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,11
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 7
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~" ~ ~~"" ~ ~ ~"~~~~ ~ = = = = = = = === ~ ~ == = === = = = = = ==~ ="" =" = = = = = = = = = = = ~ ==" == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == === =
== = == = ==
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
---__n- - - _n- - - _n- _nn - - - - - - - - - _n _--h - __nnnn nnh_- _n_nhnn---_-__n- nn_n_____n- ------------------
162275 09/14/01 001267 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC 317542 08/27/01 PKRCS-FOOD, PRESCHOOL 100.29 100.29
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162276 09/14/01 001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC 44846 08/30/01 PKM-FIELD PAINT/STENCI 157.22 157.22
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162277 09/14/01 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 22011 08/27/01 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT 313.02
Voucher, Bank Code, key 22110 08/28/01 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT 76.92 389.94
162278 09/14/01 001503 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICE CO 11064784 08/14/01 PKM-REPLACE FLUSH VAL V 195.76 195.76
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162279 09/14/01 001604 BALL, GIGI Y CA15597FW 08/31/01 MC- INTERPRETER, CA15597 35.00 35.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162280 09/14/01 001612 POLLARD GROUP INC 53787 08/27/01 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS 140.87 140.87
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162281 09/14/01 001618 SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW GLASS 1049244 08/21/01 PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR 305.29 305.29
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162282 09/14/01 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 204041 08/20/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 129.42
Voucher, Bank Code, key 202925 08/24/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 84.81
204591 08/24/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 234.90
197364-81 08/24/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 7.62
205648 08/23/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 20.65
186691-80 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 27.20
202910 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 93 24
202927 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 157.11
198617- 02 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 255.63
195564 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 652.80
202926 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 352.35
194703-01 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 146.28
202903 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 431.17
202584 08/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 411.26
198617-80 08/21/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 569.02
205085 08/20/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 100.00 3,673.46
162283 09/14/01 001686 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MACHI 00080615 08/31/01 MSMD-QTR COPIER MAINT 390.70 390.70
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162284 09/14/01 001715 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN 64680 08/24/01 RCS-PESTICIDE SVCS 54.40
Voucher, Bank Code, key 64681 08/24/01 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 103.36
64685 08/24/01 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 569.02
64688 08/24/01 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 244.80 971.58
162285 09/14/01 001793 MICROFLEX INC 00013191 09/04/01 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 202.47 202.47
Voucher, Bank Code, key
}î
- -~ - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _n - - - - - - - - - - - - _n__nn _n_n- - - - - - --- - - - n- - - - n - -- __n- nn_- _n - - - - -- -- - - - n__- - - - - - - -
-- -- -- -- - - ----
VJ Page,
f\I
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,11
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
Check
Date
Vendor
"""""" = = = = = = =, = = === = = = == = = = = = = === = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = ======= == = = = = === == = = = = = = == =, = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = =
= = == = = = == = = = = == = = = = = = =
Invoice
Inv. Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
_nnnunnnnnn- _unnnnn_- _n__n--__n-----
_u u - - - -- n n n -- -- - --- u n u -- - -- - nn - - nn
162286 09/14/01 001794
Voucher,
162287 09/14/01 001805
Voucher,
162288 09/14/01 001814
Voucher,
162289 09/14/01 001856
Voucher,
162290 09/14/01 001893
Voucher,
162291 09/14/01 001902
Voucher,
162292 09/14/01 001939
Voucher,
162293 09/14/01 001970
Voucher,
162294 09/14/01 001988
Voucher,
162295 09/14/01 001989
Voucher,
162296 09/14/01 002073
Voucher,
162297 09/14/01 002149
Voucher,
162298 09/14/01 002176
Voucher,
162299 09/14/01 002204
Voucher,
162300 09/14/01 002231
Voucher,
162301 09/14/01 002279
Voucher,
PETE'S TOWING SERVI CE
Bank Code, key
260698
08/24/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES
195.84
195.84
VADIS NORTHWEST
Bank Code' key
00012063
08/31/01 PWSWR-LITTER CONTROL S
4,020.00
4,020 00
PARAMETRIX INC
Bank Code, key
03-40969
08/16/01 PWSCIP-BPA TRAIL CORRI
13,286.54
13,286.54
08/31/01 PWS-STREET SWEEPING SV
2,961.20
2,961.20
ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION 33346
Bank Code, key
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT SIF-AUG 20 09/06/01 MSF-REMIT IMPACT FEES
Bank Code, key
2,710.00
2,710.00
MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE
Bank Code, key
3475
3474
09/01/01 PKCHB-LANDSCAPE MAINT
09/01/01 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV
08/16/01 CDPL-ENV REV,EHLKE
576.22
576.22
260.21
1,795.66
2,055.87
LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
Bank Code, key
0011249
INPRA
Bank Code, key
PKA-SCHROD 09/12/01 PKA-l YR MEMBER DUES
60.00
60.00
SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY
Bank Code, key
830/4013
08/30/01 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES
27.77
27.77
3754394-00 08/23/01 MSDP-KIT TONE GENERATO
190.25
190.25
JENSEN TOOLS INC
Bank Code, key
VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENT MSHR-JUL 1 08/21/01 MSHR-HEPATITIS B SHOTS
Bank Code, key
200.00
200.00
D C WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES I 942164
Bank Code, key
07/23/01 CM- INTERPRETER SERVICE
140.00
140.00
TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
Bank Code, key
08/30/01 PWS-MISC SUPPLIES
23.44
23.44
4614911
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY
Bank Code, key
24-102669
09/01/01 PKM-WECO WIL-GRO 18-6-
838.85
838.85
SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC
Bank Code, key
96581
96574
08/31/01 SWM-WETLAND BIOLOGIST
08/31/01 CDPL-ENV REV,NEW HIGH
264.06
174.00
438.06
GIESY, GREER & GUNN INC
Bank Code, key
TAC10210-2 07/24/01 MSRM-E WILBURN CLAIM
98.08
98.08
';:; """""",..."""""',, """",.'"",".",...,..""",...",.,,"""',........""".,"...."...""""";;;;;';
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,11
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
= = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = == = = = = === = = = == = == = == == = === = = = = = = = = = === = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = === == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
-------------------_u_--_uu_----- uhuu-- -_u_u__uu_u_----- _uuuuu_--- u__uuu-_U_---
162302 09/14/01 002379 PACIFIC TOPSOILS INC 28006 07/26/01 SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES 440.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key 29454 09/05/01 PWS-SOIL/SODDUMP 110.00
29459 09/05/01 PWS-SOIL/SODDUMP 110.00 660.00
162303 09/14/01 002386 PAWLAK, SUSAN CA14609FW 09/11/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA14609 70.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key CA20094FW 09/04/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA20094 61. 25 131.25
162304 09/14/01 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY 74604 08/08/01 PKRLS-TRASH BAGS 24.93
Voucher, Bank Code, key 75943 08/17/01 PKRLS-TISSUE/TOWELS/GL 82.14
76630 08/23/01 PKRCS-SNACKS, HORTICULT 7.89
76881 08/24/01 PKRCS-PRESCHOOL SNACKS 250.93
77373 08/28/01 PKRLS-HAND TOWELS/LINE 91.59
78347 09/05/01 PKRLS-TRASH BAGS 41. 66 499.14
162305 09/14/01 002477 HOME DEPOT 7060590 08/08/01 PKM-COVERS/NUTS/BOLTS 16.94
Vouchee Bank Code, key 7051033 08/08/01 RCS-HORTICULTURE SUPPL 88.65
6060821 08/09/01 RCS-HORTICULTURE SUPPL 31.18
5162081 08/10/01 PWS-CORD/SPA TABLETS 43.30
8062263 08/17/01 PKM-HOSE 61. 82
7111779 08/18/01 RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 21. 66
4060589 08/21/01 PKM-FLOWERS, CITY HALL 34.29
3050728 08/22/01 PKM-SPRINKLER HD/TAPE 120.12
8061681 08/27/01 PKM-PAINT/PUTTY/CLEANE 88.97
4052283 08/31/01 SWM-DUCT TAPE/EXT SPRI 14.60
5060313 08/20/01 SWM-32 GAL CONTAINER 11.90 533.43
162306 09/14/01 002480 SIGNAL EQUIPMENT INC 15568 08/17/01 PRLS-FIRE ALARM INSPEC 266.56 266.56
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162307 09/14/01 002488 GRINNELL FIRE PROTECTION 041-55637 08/22/01 PKRLS-SPRINKLER INSPEC 210.00 210.00
Vouchee Bank Code, key
162308 09/14/01 002538 RHINE EQUIPMENT COMPANY R08649 08/22/01 SWM-EXCAVATOR RENTAL F 1,491.88 1,491.88
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162309 09/14/01 002545 PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC 66119 08/29/01 PKCHB-PHASE MONITOR 922.75
Voucher, Bank Code, key 66118 08/29/01 PKCHB-REPAIR AIR CONDI 174.08
66117 08/29/01 PKCHB-HVAC MAINT SVCS 154.50 1,251.33
162310 09/14/01 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 1-302719 08/23/01 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC 130.56 130.56
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162311 09/14/01 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT 011606 09/07/01 PKM-REIM PETTY CASH 93.40 93.40
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162312 09/14/01 002566 QWEST TAC-3644-6 08/25/01 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD 107.67 107.67
Voucher, Bank Code, key
71
--w---_u_- - ----- ----_u_--_u_u_---_uu-------_u__u_----_u_u_---_u_----uuu-_u_----------------_u---- - --------u_u_---
'" Page,
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,11
","
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 10
Check
Date
Vendor
000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 = = = = 0 0 = = = = = = = = = 0 = = = = = = = = = 0 = = = = = = = = 0 = = = = 0 0 0 = = = = = = = = 0 0 = = = = = = = 0 = = = = = = =
= = = 0 0 = = = = = = = = = = 0 = = = = 0 = = = = = 0 = =
Invoice
Inv.Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
---------------------- --------------- ------------------
------------------------------------ ----------
162313 09/14/01 002797
Voucher,
162314 09/14/01 002899
Voucher,
162315 09/14/01 002933
Voucher,
162316 09/14/01 003035
Voucher,
162317 09/14/01 003085
Voucher,
162318 09/14/01 003090
Voucher,
162319 09/14/01 003109
Voucher,
162320 09/14/01 003118
Voucher,
162321 09/14/01 003129
Voucher'
162322 09/14/01 003157
Voucher,
162323 09/14/01 003162
Voucher,
162324 09/14/01 003170
Voucher,
162325 09/14/01 003209
Voucher,
162326 09/14/01 003211
Voucher'
162327 09/14/01 003212
Voucher,
162328 09/14/01 003365
Voucher,
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROU 785063
Bank Code, key 785946
LOMBARDO, V MYRIAM
Bank Code " key
ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC
Bank Code, key
JORGENSEN, RONALD THORPE
Bank Code, key
GUIDANCE SERVICES INC
Bank Code, key
ARTCO CRAFTS
Bank Code, key
WOODS TONE CREDIT UNION
Bank Code, key
GALL'S INC
Bank Code, key
AMS LASER SUPPLY
Bank Code, key
LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF WA
Bank Code, key
U S TOY CO INC
Bank Code, key
CA16379FW
CA18372FW
09/11/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA16379
08/29/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA18372
40.00
40.00
80.00
0.2001012. 07/11/01 CDPL-ENV REV,E CAMPUS
2,531.44
2,531.44
APR4-MAY30 08/09/01 PKRCS-TAI CHI PROGRAMS
470.00
470.00
S28700
09/05/01 MSA-TEMP OFFICE HELP
321.75
321.75
2051
09/04/01 MSDP/PS-LAPTOP
09/06/01 MSDP/PS-LAPTOPS
08/23/01 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
8,908.54
57.21
1,338.24
7,570.30
57.21
2001-09
09/05/01 PS-LEASE CONTRACT
1,792.00
1,792.00
5505512300 08/15/01 PS-BARRIER TAPE,CRIME
108.89
108"89
316716
317029
08/24/01 MSDP-PRINTER TONER
09/05/01 MSDP-PRINTER TONER
08/01/01 MSFLT-TIRES,M23658
282.72
403 .48
686.20
201892
328.49
328.49
8063995501 08/06/01 RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES
200.25
200.25
08/28/01 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S
32.64
32.64
MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 29783
Bank Code, key
875.00
01-004
08/31/01 PS-PRE-EMP POLYGRAPHS
875.00
WASHINGTON POLYGRAPH
Bank Code, key
IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE INC
Bank Code, key
PEARSON, BRIAN
Bank Code, key
HEAVENER, DONOVAN
Bank Code, key
445030506
08/31/01 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE SV
1,310.22
1,310.22
MSDP-OCT6- 09/13/01 MSDP-REIM DEFINITY CON
538.00
538.00
PS-AUG 27T 08/27/01 PS-REIMB, TUITION FEES
MSHR-AUG 2 09/10/01 MSHR-EDUCATION ASSISTA
65 90
261.60
327 50
:1;- - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - --- - - -- - - - - --- - - - ---- - --- - - - - --- -- - - - --- --- - - --- - - - - - - - --- - --- - -- - - - - -- - - ---
- - -- - - - - - -- - --~~~~; -~;
-üy
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,12
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 11
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = ===== = = = == = = = = === = ==== ==== = === = = = = ==== = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = == == = = = = = = = === = = = = = == ==
Inv. Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
Date
Invoice
_nnnnnn_- nn__u_nHnn-
__nn__nuu__nn_nnn___nn_- _un_un
162329 09/14/01 003385
Voucher,
162330 09/14/01 003399
Voucher,
162331 09/14/01 003444
Voucher,
162332 09/14/01 003466
Voucher,
162333 09/14/01 003500
Voucher,
162334 09/14/01 003520
Voucher,
162335 09/14/01 003521
Voucher'
162336 09/14/01 003536
Voucher,
162337 09/14/01 003586
Voucher,
162338 09/14/01 003645
Voucher,
162339 09/14/01 003713
Voucher,
162340 09/14/01 003736
Voucher,
162341 09/14/01 003825
Voucher,
162342 09/14/01 003832
Voucher,
162343 09/14/01 003837
Voucher,
162344 09/14/01 003841
Voucher,
100.00
100.00
JUN28-AUG3 06/29/01 PKRCS-CITY ART EXHIBIT
SHARMA, MEENA
Bank Code, key
KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY
Bank Code, key
AUG21-SEP4 09/04/01 MC-INTERPRETER,AUG21-S
160.00
160.00
WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS
Bank Code, key
AUG1-AUG31 08/31/01 PS-UNIFORM CLEANING
747.96
747.96
LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY IN 195701
Bank Code, key 194818
WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS
Bank Code, key
11296
11295
08/14/01 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIE
08/17/01 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIE
08/17/01 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYS
08/17/01 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYS
60.00
35.90
95.90
PHUNG, NOVA C
Bank Code, key
CA20093FW
78.88
78.88
157.76
09/11/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA20093
40.00
40.00
WILSON, GREG
Bank Code, key
MAY14-AUG1 09/10/01 MSHR-EDUCATION ASSISTA
439.20
439.20
ERGO & HEALTH NETWORK
Bank Code, key
3562
POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION
Bank Code, key
17925
08/23/01 LAW-KEYBOARD TRAY
183.87
AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE 1670-1679
Bank Code, key 1680
1681
KING COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH D 7100414
Bank Code, key
6218
183.87
05/18/01 PS-NATL VOLUNTEER CONF
600.00
600.00
09/05/01 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT
09/05/01 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT
09/05/01 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT
08/22/01 CDHS-LIQUOR PROFIT/EXC
7,909.30
917.00
475.00
9,301.30
3,683.37
3,683.37
09/06/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES
75.62
75.62
NORTHWEST TOWING INC
Bank Code, key
WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEP JA4020 LOO 08/14/01 PWT-REVIEW SIGNAL WARR
Bank Code, key
CITY OF SEATTLE POLICE DEPT PS-BELLI
Bank Code, key
315.04
315.04
08/28/01 PS-FRAUD TRNG,B BELLI
5.00
5.00
22.02
53.71
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Bank Code, key
000F6588V3 08/25/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
000F6588V3 09/01/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
75.73
TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WA INC 3547
Bank Code, key
09/01/01 PKM-SANITATION SERVICE
448.25
448.25
}! - -- ---------_u_---------- n___n _u_-______n_--____n__-___n_---- ___n__- nn-U---------- - ____u_n_- --------_uu_-~~;~~-~~
-~
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,12
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 12
Check
Date
Vendor
000 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Invoice
Inv. Date Description
nn _u n nn nn --n - n - nn - - -- n n - - un n_n n_--n
55.00
55.00
------------------
US IDENTIFICATION MANUAL
Bank Code, key
n_nnn u_nnn-
08/31/01 PS-IDENTIFICATION MANU
162345 09/14/01 003885
Voucher,
162346 09/14/01 003898
Voucher,
162347 09/14/01 003999
Voucher,
162348 09/14/01 004004
Voucher,
162349 09/14/01 004052
Voucher,
162350 09/14/01 004084
Voucher,
162351 09/14/01 004093
Voucher,
162352 09/14/01 004094
Voucher,
162353 09/14/01 004128
Voucher,
162354 09/14/01 004190
Voucher,
162355 09/14/01 004196
Vouchee
162356 09/14/01 004258
Voucher,
162357 09/14/01 004263
Voucher,
162358 09/14/01 004270
Voucher,
KING COUNTY RADIO
Bank Code, key
OREGON STATE-DMV SERVICES
Bank Code, key
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
Bank Code, key
18332
300501
08/31/01 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES
ODL, 90003 08/23/01 PS-PHOTOGRAPH LINE-UP
PS-SEPT 20 09/01/01 PS-LEASE CONTRACT
LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT D 08200103
Bank Code, key 08300103
COUNTRY GREEN TURF FARMS
Bank Code, key
QWEST INTERPRISE
Bank Code, key
MATHESON, DEREK
Bank Code, key
116749
116750
115560
7342
08/20/01 PS-REMINGTON SHOTGUN
08/30/01 PS-BATONS/RUBBER BALLS
08/16/01 PKPL-SKATE PARK TURF
08/17/01 PKPL-SKATE PARK TURF
07/19/01 PKPL-GLOVES,SKATE PARK
08/17/01 PKPL-CR,PALLET DEPOSIT
D08-6046-0 08/19/01 MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES
AUG19-AUG2 09/13/01 CM-REIM SISTER CITY EX
MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERNATION 4196
Bank Code, key 4185
BAYLEY, LILLY MAY
Bank Code, key
LASER QUEST - FEDERAL WAY
Bank Code, key
CA19293FW
091301JAW
07/31/01 CM-FALL QTR NEWSLETTER
07/31/01 CM-FALL QTR NEWSLETTER
09/11/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA19293
09/13/01 PKRCS-SPECIAL POPS EVE
AUG6-AUG31 09/13/01 PS-REMIT CPL FEES
WA STATE-DEPT OF LICENSING
Bank Code, key
PANASONIC/HEARTLAND SERVICE HSIO061527 08/31/01 MSDP/PS-LAPTOP REPAIR
Bank Code, key
FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
Bank Code, key
003288
003302
003296
003295
003290
003289
003287
003274
08/18/01
08/25/01
08/22/01
08/22/01
08/18/01
08/18/01
08/18/01
08/11/01
CDBG-NOTICE, PROJECT CA
CDPL-NOTICE, COTTAGES W
CDPL-NOTICE, DEVONSHIRE
CDPL- NOTICE, NEW HIGH S
CDPL-NOTICE, POWELL HOM
CDPL-NOTICE, GLENWOOD P
CDPL-NOTICE, PLANNING C
CDPL-NOTICE,AMEND ZONI
ñ
- -~ - - n- - - - - - _nn - - - - - - - - - - -- - n- - - n- - - - - - n_n_n - - n_un - - nU-
--¡J
3,741.00
3,741.00
15.50
15.50
1,535.81
1,535.81
1,044.12
4,505.46
1,480.80
1,390.08
4.27
-120.00
5,549.58
2,755.15
462.45
462.45
633.70
633.70
187.68
4,836.93
5,024.61
90.00
90.00
56.00
56.00
705.00
705.00
405.44
405.44
69.58
246.68
126.50
126.50
126.50
126.50
110.80
126.50
- -- nn - _--n - - - - - -- n - - -- __n- - - - n_n- -- - - __n-
Page, 12
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,12
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 13
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = == ======= = = = = == = = = = === = = = = = = = == ====== == == = = = = ==== = = = == = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = == = = = = == == =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
-___h _hh__- --_--hhhh______--hhhhh_hh hh____-- h___h___h______---- __hh_hhh_- _h___hh____----
16235S 09/14/01 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR (continued)
003272 OS/11/01 CDPL-NOTICE,COTTAGES A 126.50
003263 OS/OS/Ol CDPL-NOTICE,BUTKO 4-LO 126.50
003262 OS/OS/Ol CDPL-NOTICE,BUTKO 2-LO 126.50
003250 OS/01/01 CDPL-NOTICE, PLANNING C 126.50
003251 OS/01/01 CDBG-NOTICE, PROJECT CA 82.23 1,647.79
162359 09/14/01 004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REPAIR 002540 09/05/01 MSFLT-ALIGN/SHOCKS/BAL 735.54
Voucher, Bank Code, key 002547 09/06/01 MSFLT-REPAIR EGR SYSTE 234.47 970.01
162360 09/14/01 004420 HOUSING WASHINGTON CONFEREN CDHS-YNTEM 09/06/01 CDHS-CONF FEE,S YNTEMA 210.00 210.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162361 09/14/01 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 0.00
"VOID" Voucher, Bank Code, key
162362 09/14/01 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 00002423 OS/29/01 CDPL-MISC CODE AMENDME 270.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key 00002422 OS/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,RESIDENTI 269. 2S
00002424 OS/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV , NEW H 396.00
00002427 OS/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,NEW H 2S4.40
00002434 OS/29/01 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV, CArl 148.50
00002435 OS/29/01 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV , GOLD 269.94
00002428 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV, STATI 28.38
00002431 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV, ST FR 16.50
00002426 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,SAVON DRU 237.60
00002425 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,QUADRANT 93.72
00002429 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,COTTAGES/ 1,202.36
00002430 08/29/01 CDPL-EXP REV,GLENWOOD 1,343.76
00002421 08/29/01 CDPL-MISC CODE AMEND ME 1,177.00
00002432 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV, ST FR 390.72
00002433-1 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,PAVIL 83.70
00002433-2 08/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,PAVILION 148.79 6,360.65
162363 09/14/01 004604 INFORMlX SOFTWARE lNC 1186698 09/06/01 MSDP-IDS WORKGROUP MAl 6,528.00 6,528.00
Voucher' Bank Code, key
162364 09/14/01 004628 WA STATE PATROL IDENTIFICAT AUG8-AUG31 09/04/01 PS-REMIT CPL FEES 456.00 456.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162365 09/14/01 004648 AA ASPHALTING INC 0018455 09/07/01 PKCP-SPEED BUMPS 652.80 652.S0
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162366 09/14/01 004654 SEAVIEW INC MSA-JULY 1 OS/17/01 MSA-LIQUOR LICENSE INF 10.00 10.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162367 09/14/01 004669 AT&T BROADBAND 8498340160 08/27/01 MSGAC-DMX MUSIC SVC 65.00 65.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
~
- -~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - h- - h - - - hh- h -- - - - - - - - --- - - - h- - h - - - - - - -- - - h- h -- _h - - - -- - - - - - - - - --- h - - - - - - --- - -
- - - h - - h- - ~~;~;-~;
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,12
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 14
Check
Vendor
000000000 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 = = = = = ~ ~ == = = = = = = = == = = = = = = === = = = =~=== = = = ~=== = =~~= = = = = =~~= == = = = = ~ = == = == = = = = = = =
== = = = = = ~ = = =~ = ==~~= = = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
Date
Invoice
---_u_---------------------------u ----------
162368 09/14/01 004701
Voucher,
162369 09/14/01 004840
Voucher,
162370 09/14/01 004849
Voucher,
162371 09/14/01 00487"
Voucher'
162372 09/14/01 004919
Voucher'
162373 09/14/01 004982
Voucher,
162374 09/14/01 004983
Voucher,
162375 09/14/01 005019
Voucher,
162376 09/14/01 005043
Voucher,
162377 09/14/01 005098
Voucher,
162378 09/14/01 005141
Voucher,
162379 09/14/01 005208
Voucher,
)¡
~-----
Inv. Date Description
---------
---- uu----------- -----_u_---------
1,465.34
1,465.34
0002682579 08/25/01 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
Bank Code, key
EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE
Bank Code, key
100267
100279
100292
100299
100291
100290
100289
08/12/01
08/15/01
08/22/01
08/26/01
08/21/01
08/21/01
08/21/01
PS-REPAIR MAP LIGHT
PS-REPLACE MTVA AMP
PS-SECURE FLASHLIGHT C
PS- INSTALL SIREN/LIGHT
PS-DOME LIGHT
PS-DOME LIGHT
PS-DOME LIGHT /SPOTLIGH
08/27/01 PKCHB-TOWELS/TlSSUE/LI
08/29/01 PKM-BANDING TOOL BANRS
08/24/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
08/02/01 PKM-LIFEGUARD SUITS
08/27/01 MSHR-OSTEOPOROSIS SCRE
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST IN 20285999-0 08/21/01 PKM-SKID LOADER RENTAL
Bank Code, key 20205874-0 08/17/01 PKM-TRENCHER RENTAL
MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT T0845201
Bank Code, key
BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO S 240112
Bank Code, key 6921
240053
239804
240007
IKON DOCUMENT SERVICES
Bank Code, key
BEV108922
08/06/01 SWMM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL
79.96
65.10
32.55
444.85
54.25
54.25
86.80
817.76
SAM'S JANITORIAL SERVICE &, 56264
Bank Code, key
HIGH FLYING BANNERS INC
Bank Code, key
3802
08/24/01 MSFLT-HEADLIGHT ASSEMB
08/17/01 PS-CUT DOWN BUCKET SEA
08/23/01 PS-BATTERY/ELEC INSP,M
08/17/01 PS-BATTERY/REPAIR LAP
08/22/01 PS- SHOCKS/ALIGN, M56 6 02
08/07/01 PWS-PRINTING,23RD AVE
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
08/31/01
PKRCS-AUG VISA CHARGES
PWS-AUG VISA CHARGES
PWA-AUG VISA CHARGES
SWM-AUG VISA CHARGES
SWM-AUG VISA CHARGES
CDA-AUG VISA CHARGES
MSDP-AUG VISA CHARGES
PKM-AUG VISA CHARGES
232.44
232.44
BRATWEAR
Bank Code' key
3013381
143.62
143.62
J D PENCE AQUATIC SUPPLY IN 45713-00
Bank Code, key
MEDICAL INTEGRATION SERVICE 01082701
Bank Code, key
FIRST USA FINANCIAL SERVICE
Bank Code, key
PKRCS-FABE
PWS-FOSTER
PWA-JACKSO
SWM-KENNIS
MACGILLIVR
CDA-LYLE
MSDP- PETIT
PKM-REUTER
294 . 04
294 . 04
261.72
261.72
540.00
540.00
242.24
317.71
559.95
2,012.80
2,012.80
334.43
326.40
135.95
252.91
268.14
1,317.83
1,029.68
1,029.68
33.12
191.42
2,197.27
100.06
38.87
658.64
568.16
296.50
-- - - - - - - - - - - -- u - - - - - - - - - u- u - u - -- ---- -- - - -_u- -- - - - - UU ------ - -- --- - - -- -- - - _u--- - - - - ---- - - ------- - -- --- - ---u u_- -- - - --
Page' 14
0 chklst
09/13/200116,06,12
- -..........
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 15
Check
Date
Vendor
000000000000 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = === === = = = == = = = = = = = = == = = = ==
= = = = == = = = = = == = = ==== == = = = === = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
------------------------------------ ----------
Invoice
162379 09/14/01 005208
162380 09/14/01 005215
Voucher,
162381 09/14/01 005231
Voucher,
162382 09/14/01 005253
Voucher,
162383 09/14/01 005254
Voucher,
162384 09/14/01 005286
Voucher,
162385 09/14/01 005287
Voucher'
162386 09/14/01 005335
Voucher,
162387 09/14/01 005339
Voucher,
162388 09/14/01 005340
Voucher,
162389 09/14/01 005406
Voucher,
162390 09/14/01 005421
Voucher,
162391 09/14/01 005428
Voucher,
ñ
-- -~-- --- - - - - -- -- -- - --- -- -
~
FIRST USA FINANCIAL SERVICE
TAB PRODUCTS CO
Bank Code, key
IOS CAPITAL INC
Bank Code, key
U S BAN CORP
Bank Code, key
U S BAN CORP
Bank Code, key
ALLIED BODY WORKS INC
Bank Code, key
AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS &
Bank Code, key
ECO NORTHWEST
Bank Code, key
LOWE'S HIW INC
Bank Code, key
SENIOR SERVICES OF SEATTLE
Bank Code, key
MAYBERRY, MITCHEL
Bank Code' key
BARGER, KENNETH
Bank Code, key
Inv. Date Description
1258795
PWS-THOMAS 08/31/01 PWS-AUG VISA CHARGES
52651956
08/29/01 MC-YEAR LABELS
08/28/01 MSM&D-COPIER RENTAL
MSF-AUG CH 09/05/01 MSF-AUGUST VISA CHARGE
PS-AUG CHG 09/05/01 PS-AUGUST VISA CHARGES
11912
D6416
D6417
3904
0024207916
0024214919
0024214919
0024214919
0024218921
0024221922
0024225924
0024234928
0024235928
0024234928
PKRLS-JUL
08/31/01 MSFLT-T/G PIN 1-1/4 HD
09/01/01 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT
09/01/01 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT
08/31/01 CDPL-CFW MARKET ANALYS
07/26/01
08/02/01
08/02/01
08/02/01
08/06/01
08/09/01
08/13/01
08/22/01
08/23/01
08/22/01
PKM-OUTDOOR WOOD
PWS-MIRACLE GRO
PWS-CHLORINATING TABLE
PWS-WORK GLOVES
PKM-TOILET TANK REPAIR
PKM-SOAKER HOSES
PKCP-PIPE
PWS-LOPPER/LANTERN BAT
PS-CRIME SCENE PARTS B
PKDBC-MOP /BROOM/DUST P
09/05/01 PRCS-SR LUNCH PROG/JUL
JUN20-AUG8 09/01/01 PKRCS-MARTIAL ART CLAS
CA08498FW
CA21017FW
CA18372FW
09/06/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA08498
09/04/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA21017
08/28/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA18372
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SERV PWS-AUG 18 08/18/01 PWSCIP-PAC HWY HOV PHA
Bank Code, key
--------------- ------------------
26.65
(cont inued)
4,110.69
78.20
78.20
2,642.18
2,642.18
765.93
765.93
4,728.57
4,728.57
54.62
54.62
148.06
87.81
235.87
6,331.65
6,331.65
13.88
14.01
18.78
5.37
8.53
85.76
100.44
68.09
5.35
88.62
408.83
405.75
405.75
760.00
760.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
120.00
11,491.00
11,491.00
--- ---------- ------------ ------- ------------------------------------------------------- --- ---------------
Page, 15
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,12
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 16
Check
Date
Vendor
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = =~ ~ = = = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = == ~ ~= = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = === = = == = = == = = = =
= = = == = = = = = = = = == = = = = === = == = = = == = = = = = =
Amount Paid
Check Total
------------------------------------ ----------
Invoice
2341295-00 08/15/01 PS-HANDHELD TAPE RECOR
Inv. Date Description
---------------------- --------------- ------------------
289.90
289.90
162392 09/14/01 005436
Voucher,
162393 09/14/01 005501
Voucher,
162394 09/14/01 005539
Voucher,
162395 09/14/01 005544
Voucher'
162396 09/14/01 005565
Voucher,
162397 09/14/01 005572
Voucher'
162398 09/14/01 005598
Voucher,
162399 09/14/01 005623
Voucher,
162400 09/14/01 005668
Voucher,
162401 09/14/01 005674
Voucher,
162402 09/14/01 005680
Voucher'
162403 09/14/01 005704
Voucher,
162404 09/14/01 005715
Voucher,
162405 09/14/01 005842
Voucher,
162406 09/14/01 005865
Voucher,
162407 09/14/01 005891
Voucher,
]1
--~
'" --- --
DBL DISTRIBUTING INC
Bank Code, key
ANDREWS, AMY
Bank Code, key
SEMISI-TUPOU, VAIVAO
Bank Code, key
FALCON ASSOCIATES INC
Bank Code, key
WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS
Bank Code, key
NABCEO-NATL ASSOC OF BLACK
Bank Code, key
ELLIOTT SALES CORPORATION
Bank Code, key
CA14632FW
CA21232FW
5882
1200
08/28/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA14632
08/28/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA21232
09/04/01 MSHR-AD,MS DEPUTY DIRE
08/24/01 MSDP-CAR POWER ADAPTER
PS-BOOTH F 08/29/01 PS-CAREER FAIR FEE
075047
200138
08/15/01 PKDBC-PROMOTIONAL PENC
08/28/01 PWSWR-RECYCLE BROCHURE
THUILLIER, JENNIFER
Bank Code, key
LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND KOLK AUG2-AUG30 08/30/01 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENSE SVC
Bank Code, key
MERCADO, ANNA M
Bank Code, key
CA19825FW
CA21353FW
WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL LLC 082401
Bank Code, key
CASCADE ELEVATOR COMPANY
Bank Code, key
ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS INC
Bank Code, key
DPK INC
Bank Code, key
JANICE'S CRITTER CARE LLC
Bank Code, key
SUDDEN IMAGE INC
Bank Code, key
2745
2740
K6163838I
3,AGOl-63
2670
2915
- - - - - - - -- - - - ------- - - - - --- ---- --- -- --- -- - - - ---- --
09/04/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA19825
09/11/01 MC- INTERPRETER, CA21353
08/24/01 PS-FIRING RANGE USE
09/03/01 PKCHB-ELEVATOR SERVICE
09/03/01 PKRCS-ELEVATOR MAINT S
09/01/01 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE
09/06/01 PWS-23RD AVE SO ROADWA
08/24/01 PKRCS-DOG OBEDIENCE CL
08/31/01 PS-PHOTO SERVICES
--------------------------
60.00
60.00
110.00
110.00
180.00
180.00
114.20
114.20
100.00
100.00
277.12
277.12
250.00
250.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
60.00
100.00
160.00
569 63
569.63
141.44
141.44
282.88
898.89
898.89
280,803.23
280,803.23
384.00
384.00
983.91
983.91
Page, 16
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,13
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 17
Check
Vendor
""""""""""" ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"" = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = == = == = == = ~ = = == = = =~ = ~ ~ ~ = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = ~ = = =" = = ="
~ = =" ~ ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =" = ~ ~ =
Inv. Date Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
Date
Invoice
~n_n_________n__nn____n_n__n ---------~
162408 09/14/01 005895
Voucher,
162409 09/14/01 005934
Voucher,
162410 09/14/01 005939
Voucher,
162411 09/14/01 005941
Voucher,
162412 09/14/01 005957
Voucher,
162413 09/14/01 005958
Voucher,
162414 09/14/01 005970
Voucher,
162415 09/14/01 005975
Voucher,
162416 09/14/01 005978
Voucher,
162417 09/14/01 005986
Voucher,
162418 09/14/01 005993
Voucher,
162419 09/14/01 005998
Voucher,
162420 09/14/01 006001
Voucher,
162421 09/14/01 700249
Voucher,
162422 09/14/01 702954
Voucher,
162423 09/14/01 702955
Voucher,
BIKE TRACK INC
Bank Code, key
K P TRANSLATION SERVICES
Bank Code, key
RIGHT BRAIN UNLIMITED LLC
Bank Code, key
PIONEER MANUFACTURING CO
Bank Code, key
CHAREUNSAP, ROSE
Bank Code, key
WATERSHED SCIENCE
Bank Code, key
TACOMA RADIOLOGY & MEDICAL
Bank Code, key
PEOPLE FRIENDLY PLACES INC
Bank Code, key
JACKSON, LAURIE
Bank Code, key
BUNTING, JOHN
Bank Code, key
SMITH, DANIEL
Bank Code, key
ARBITRAGE COMPLIANCE
Bank Code, key
NOBLE, LINDA
Bank Code, key
SECKEL, BONNIE
Bank Code, key
VISTA ENTERPRISES INC
Bank Code, key
GEO ENGINEERS INC
Bank Code, key
1866
CA21828FW
21796
96608
CA13820FW
_n________n_n----_-
_n_-----n___-_~-
08/22/01 PS-WALL BIKE RACK
463.08
463.08
09/04/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA21828
80.00
80.00
08/16/01 PKM-DOGGIE BAG WICKETS
136.49
136.49
08/29/01 PKM-FIELD PAINT
1,343.50
1,343.50
09/04/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA13820
61.60
61.60
SWM-TRAINI 08/25/01 SWM-TRAINING WORKSHOP
405.26
405.26
158054009
10461
06/07/01 PS-EMP PHYSICAL EXAM
116.50
116.50
08/27/01 PS-BIG RULER MIRROR
114.00
114.00
AUG26-AUG3 09/04/01 PS-REIMBURSE MILEAGE
320 57
320.57
PWS-BUNTIN 08/28/01 PWS-REIMBURSE RAINGEAR
64.64
64.64
SWM-AUG 30 08/30/01 SWMWQ-REIM SAMPLING SU
72.45
72.45
20641
CAI9963FW
88479
02-35258
02-34090
11/30/00 MSF-LTGO CALCULATIONS
2,603.33
2,603.33
08/30/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CAI9963
72.70
72.70
09/07/01 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE
50.00
50.00
09/04/01 PW-REFUND ROW98-0265
1,000.00
1,000.00
08/31/01 PW-REFUND ROW98-0066
300.00
300.00
!:\
-11- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n - - n - _n--- ---- - --_n- -- - n - -- _un - - ------- - - - n - --_u n - - - ------- - - - - - - -- - - --- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - ---- -
~~~~; -;:;
0 chklst
09/13/2001 16,06,13
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 18
0000000000000000000000000000::::::::::: =:=: = = = = = = = =0: = = = = =====:0== = =====:== == = = = =:: = = = = == = = =: == = = = = = = ==: = = = = = = =:: = = = = = = = = = =: = =
= = = 0 = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
-------- ----------------------------_u----- ---------- -------- ---------------------- -----------_u- ------------------
162424 09/14/01 702956 KING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION C1758R8488 09/06/01 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DP 150.00 150.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162425 09/14/01 702957 WILKINSON ENTERPRISES INC Cl794R8647 09/06/01 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DP 150.00 150.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162426 09/14/01 702958 UNIVERSITY PLACE LATCHKEY C1623R7888 09/06/01 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DP 150.00 150.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162427 09/14/01 702959 GRAEBER, JON I C1572R7503 09/06/01 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DP 300.00 300.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162428 09/14/01 702960 KUN, MICHAEL L 03-36051 09/04/01 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162429 09/14/01 702961 HARDESTY, SUZANNE 87749 08/30/01 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 15.60 15.60
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162430 09/14/01 702962 TIBBELS, LARRY 87743 08/30/01 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162431 09/14/01 702963 HITZTALER, JANE 88482 09/07/01 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 8.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key 88481 09/07/01 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 22.00 30.00
162432 09/14/01 702964 MURRAY, ELVIA 88483 09/07/01 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 40.00 40.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162433 09/14/01 702965 MARTIN, TISHA 88478 09/07/01 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE 20.00 20.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162434 09/14/01 702966 UKRANIAN GOSPEL CHURCH 88480 09/07/01 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162435 09/14/01 702967 BLACKNER, DAN CDCI-MAY 4 09/06/01 CDCI-BARK,BPA TRAILHEA 167.13 167.13
Voucher, Bank Code, key
162436 09/14/01 702969 LET'S MAKE A DEAL USED CAR 01-41196 08/31/01 MSF-REFUND LICENSE FEE 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
- -- u-- -- -- --- ----
221 Checks in this report Total Checks, 1,028,977.30
77
\f;: -- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - ---- -- ---- --- - - - ------- - --- ----- -- - - ---- - --
- - ----- -- ------ ----- - - - - --- - - -- -- -- - -- - -- - - - -- ------- - - - - ----
Page' 18
MEETING DATE:
October 16,2001
ITEM# ~ ló--)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
August 200 I Financial Report
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[Z CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: August 2001 Financial Report
SU~YmACKGROUND:
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was review and approved by the Finance Committee
during their meeting on October 3,2001.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approval of the August 2001 Financial Report."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~..
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED-O5/10/2001
c~-'t
CITY 8F
,--..
. ~- ~. : EDERAL
~~m'
MEMORANDUM
Date:
September 19, 2001
To:
From:
Finance, Economic DeveloP7i\e¡\ & Regional Affairs Committee
David Moseley, City Manage;tJ r
Tho Kraus, Financial Management Supervisor ~
Via:
Subject:
August 2001 Monthly Financial Report
Action Requested:
Accept the August 2001 Monthly Financial Report and forward to the October 16th Council meeting for
approval.
Committee Chair:
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT
Mary Gates '77l~~ Committee M~:ber: Jeanne Burbi~'I'f'~:'<'h-;;'
Committee Member: Eric Faison ~ /--
K\FINIMFR\O 1 mfr\MFRFEDRACCVR.DOC
J-1
G -I
" A City for All of Uti"
2001 Projected Revenues & Expenditures
Overview
Significant Events
General Government
Revenues
Expenditures
Attachment A
2 -II
12-17
18
August 2001 Monthly Financial Report
OVERVIEW
The Monthly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that has taken place in the reporting period.
This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax
Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, HotellMotel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Strategic Reserve,
Airport Strategic Reserve, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Centre. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures
financial activity through August for the years 1996 through 200 I.
AUGUST HIGHLIGHTS
Special Wastemobile events scheduled/or Federal Way:
Special monthly visits to Federal Way by the Household Hazardous Wastemobile will continue through October under a King
County pilot program administered by the Solid Waste Division. A consistent schedule of Federal Way visits is part of a project
designed to test Wastemobile service improvements. If products with the words "Toxic, Poisonous or Hazardous" appear on a
product label in your home, the substance not only poses a threat to humans and pets, but the environment as well. Bring these
unwanted products to the King County Hazardous Wastemobile at the SeaTac Mall Sears parking lot fÌom 10 am to 5 pm on
August 18, September 15 and October 20. Federal Way residents dropped off more than 34 tons of hazardous household materials
in 2000.
Federal Way Family Fest:
The 2001 Federal Way Family Fest scheduled for the weekend of August 24-26 at Steel Lake Park was a wonderful event for the
Federal Way community. This year's theme was "Dreams Come True Through Open Books, Open Minds." Thousands of
residents turned out to see the entertainment, take part in activities for adults and children, eat food and buy crafts at the many
festival booths. On behalf of the city, thank you to the Family Fest organizers, city staff, and volunteers who worked so hard to
produce this successful event.
G -3
Citv of Federal Way
Au/?ustlOOI Manthlv Financial Report
GOVERNMENT ALREVENUES
General governmental operating revenue collections through August total $27,667,446, which is $2,275,847 or 9.0% above the
year-Io-date budget of $25,391,599. Of this amount, $38,600 is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the
payment of debt service. Attachment A provides a comparison of year-to-date revenues by major sources for 2001 with
comparative figures for the past 5 years.
REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES
Period Ending August 31, 2001
Property Taxes
Sales Tax
HoteVMotel Lodging Tax
Criminai Justice Sales Tax
Intergovernmental
Real Estate Excise Tax
Gambling Taxes
Utility Taxes
Court Revenue
Buiiding PermitsiFees-CD
Expedited Review Fees-CD
ROW PermitsiFees-PW
Expedited Review Fees-PW
Licenses
Franchise Fees
Recreation Fees
Dumas Bay Centre
KI1utzen Family Theatre
Interest Earnings
Admin I Cash Management Fees
SWM Fees
Refuse Coileclion Fees
Police Services
Other
SUbtotal 0 'ratin Revenues:
inteffund Transfers -In
Other Financi Sources
ro~I,R.veijue$ '&'Other Source$'
2001 ReYJsec:l BUdget Actua/s . Variance
2000 '~~Througi.- Through 1,~f¡P¡,'?,~I"{lJnfavorable):.
ACtual Annual August August .' DOllars ($) . Percent (%)
3,672,303 $ 7,200,394 $ 3,810,030 $ 3,810,030 I $ 0.0';'
6,874,166 9,905,347 6,486,800 6,810,474 : 323,674 5.0%
65,604 90,000 56,146 88,854 ; 32,708 58.3%
1,065,926 1,569.767 1,027,869 1,114,5471 86,677 8.4';'
2,351,613 3,085,827 ! 1,976,545 2,617,202 640,657 32.4';'
1,431,606 1,900,000 1,242,156 1,163,667 I (78,488) -6.3%
1,006,156 1,450,000 953,218 1,483,064 , 529,846 55.6';'
3,741,479 6,016,400 4,097,626 '~'~I 117,008 2.9';'
628,639 865,784 593,438 691,824 98,386 16.6%
685,158 1,099,804 773,647 701,138 (72,509)' -9.4%
81,226 78,508 78,508 nla
191,835 259,583 174,337 259,806, 85,469 49.0';'
32,057 15'9821 15,962 nI
84,743 174,809 58,922 58,922 0.0%
366,549 468,902 429,580 429,580 (0) 0.0%
415,721 611,896 469,923 457,195 (12.728) -2.7%
305,931 488,300 303,941 394,140 i 90,200 29.7%
39,321 65,475 32,337 47,320 I 14,983 46.3%
745,940 841,319 650,828 650'8281 0.0%
99,335 476,306 317,536 317,536 0.0%
1,624,892 3,165,155 1,583,371 1,583,371 0.0%
83,681 153,013 104,721 100,049; (4,672) -4.5';'
525,356 423,516 203,944 534,112 i 330,168 161.9%
44,280 58,599 44,685 44,685 0.0%
'26;143;$11" .40,3!!Q,196 , 26;391,599 : ?7,667,i!49>1 4i27!ìi1!47' 9.0'
-I 0.0%
7,230,373 6,490,930 ' 4,953,822 4,953,822 i 0.0%
$. . 33;373,~0 $ 46.881,126: $ 3Q,345,4;!1 $ 32,621;2681$'" 4i27!ìi847 7,5';'
COMPARISON OF 2001 OPERA 1100 REVENUES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL
$40,000,000
Total 2001 Budgeted Revenues $40,390,196
$5,000,000
2,477.
$-
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
Jan
Fe!>
Ma.
!\po
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sop
(XI
NO'.'
Dee
6 -4
City of Federal Way
Aul!ust 2001 Monthlv Fit/ancial Report
Property tax
Property tax revenues collected through August total $3,810,030, which includes the first half of property taxes due for 2001.
Actual taxes received in the CUrrent month total $26,951.
Real Estate Excise Tax
Year-to-date revenues total $1,163,667, which is $78,488 or 6.3% below budgetary projections of $1 ,242, 156 or 18.7% below the
year-to-date figure of $1,431,606 for 2000. For the current month, we received $168,149, which IS $11,145 or 6.2% below the
monthly estimate of $179,294. There were 234 real estate sales transactions in the month of August. The largest transaction was
the parcel located at 344" Street and 21" Ave SW for over $2.5 million, followed by another parcel of land located between Pacific
Hwy S, 161h Ave Sand S 2961h Street for $1.9 million.
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX ACTIVITY
Through August 2001
$2,000,000
",,"
..~"" 'I'" ..0"
..~' J":! .'r ~""
..~ ..~' .""
..",° ..~'Y
"",," ~"'~'
$1,000,000 ..",0'" ..~'
,,'I
.,~
~"
..~'
$-
81
i!!
'"
!!
I Jj
"
¿
¡
¡¡
'¡:
<;
/i¡
G-~
City of Federal Way
Aul!ust 2001 Mon/hlv Financial Reporl
Sales Tax
Sales tax received through August of$6,810,474 IS $323,674 or 5.0% above the year-to-date budget of $6,486,800. Compared to
2000, year-to-date sales tax decreased $63,692 or less than I % below the actual collection of$6,874, 166. Sales tax received in the
month of August totals $879,080 that is $48,004 or 5.8% above the adopted budget estimate of$831,075.
. 37,737.
64,333 59%
76,608 104%
-- 34,668 5.0%
.114,127 14.0%
(92,123) -117%
38,118 50%
- _48,004 5.8%
0.0%
Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 64,7% of all sales tax collections, Compared
to 2000, year-to-date retail sales tax collections are down $63,691 or less than or I %. The decline would have been steeper if not
for the monthly internal audit, which has resulted in the recovery of over $76,000 year-to-date.
Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for II % of sales tax collections lat year, is down to slightly below 10% of
the total collected and a decrease of $93,766 or 13,8% compared to 2000 activity, This is still a relatively high percentage of tax
collected when compared to the historical trend. We anticipate tax from construction to slow substantially later this year and into
the next 9 to 18 months as indicated by the number of building permit applications received for new construction.
Service industries are 10.4% of the total sales tax collections during the month of August. Year-to-date service sales taxes are up
$20,317 or 2.9% compared to 2000.
Government activity through August totals $94,181, which is a decrease of $6,771 or 7.2% !Tom the same period last year. The
decrease is due to the reduction of government projects such as road construction by the State and King County conducted within
the Federal Way city limits.
G- {,
City of Federal Way
AII~lIst 1001 Monthly Fi..ancial RefJort
Total Sales Tax
S 348th Retail Block
% ,h,oge '<om p,e.io", y'
Pe"eo', e ofto'"
SeaTac Man ,"
% ,h,oge ""m p,e.,ou, y'
Pe"eo', .o'toi"
Ma or Auto Sales,
% ,h,oge '<om p,e.iou, y'
Pe,,"o', e ofto'"
S 312th to S 316th Block
% ,h,oge '<om .,ewou, y'
Pe,,"n"g. of'o";' -
Pav!Uon Center'
% ,h,nge "_omp,e.iou, Y'
Pe"en"ge ofto',' -
Hotels &'Motels ,',
% ,h,nge ',om pm.iou, y'
Pi"en"ge 01'0",'-----
na
"-8%,
15,9%'
687885
-0,8% ,
,27,,1
254;834
~~~ I
55,413
-'H~I
91,787
1,024;387
- 69% - 110%1
16.4% 165%
, 842,559 674.390
-6,6% 5,0%'
"-4% - 10,9%1
,242.890 287706
__i4i7."¡ 10,2%:
0%, 4,3%,
56,553 60,487
2,1% 7,0%:
1,0%' 1,0%:
89,4119" 84,419
- ---~%L- -5,7%'
1,6%1 14%1
-26,053 -'- ,26,076
-t~~I---i~~t
ne
n'
2G,-
209%
(6%
ne
16%
24,081
-106%
05% '
0' ,
17%'
27;323
13-5%
Qso/;r--
ne'
03% '
-"-7%
, 2_3~.
n,
32%
ne
-10,9%
398.1%
4027%
3,1;3%
3i5%
n,
35,6%
Sales Tax Activity by Area
The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates over 135% of the City's sales tax has experienced a decline of
$131,518 or 12,5% when compared to 2000, Part of the decline is due to the decreased construction activity, and the other part of
the decline is the result of the competition from Wal-Mart which began operating in March 2000, Sales taxes have increased
$2,803 or 2% compared to the month of July 200 I, with the largest increase in the restaurants in the area,
SeaTac Mall is showing an increase of$15,737 or 2-3% when compared to 2000 activity- Sales taxes have increased $16,121 or
23-3% over the month of July 2001, wIth the largest increases in retail general merchandise and miscellaneous retail trade
categories, It is worth noting that the Mall has turned around the declining sales and is showing slow but steady increase in
activities in the last two years,
Major Auto Sales through August have collected $274,015, which is a decrease of $36,427 or II -7% compared to the prior year,
This is due to higher car sales in 2000 generated by the passing of Initiative 695, The 200 I collection is otherwise consistent with
historical trends, Sales taxes have decreased $3,296 or 8,6% compared to the month of July 2001,
South 31th to South 3l6ili Block sales tax activity has increased by $272,792 or 398,1% compared to 2000 activity, This is
mainly due to updating of our tracking system to include new businesses located in the area such as Wal-Mart, Car Toys,
Mongolian Grill, Café Indochine, and FW Auto Tech,
Hotels & Motels sales tax collected totals $83,716 through August, which is an increase of $21,388 or 34-3% over the prior year
due to the addition of new hotels in Federal Way during 2000, More detail is provided in Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax activity table,
G-1
Citv of Federal War
AU/lus/ 2001 Mon/hlv Financial ReDort
Gambling Tax
Year-to-date gambling tax collections are up $529,846 or 55.6% over the budgetary estimate of $953,218. Compared to year-to-
date 2000, collections have increased $476,909 or 47.4%. August collections are up 39,514 or 36.9% compared to the monthly
budget estimate of $107,008. This increase is partially due to the collection of $64,663 in delinquent taxes from one
establishment, and the reopening of a card room in another establishment that had ceased activity during the period July 1999
through May 2000. Four minor gambling establishments are delinquent in filing their July 2001 returns, however we expect to
collect $4,300 in delinquent taxes in the near future.
Table ",fleets gambling activity through August on a cash basis.
HoteVMotel Lodging Tax
Hotel/motel lodging tax collected through August totals $88,854, which represents activity for November 2000 through June 200 I.
This is $32,708 or 58.3% above the year-to-date budget. The month-by-month budget is not reliable as only one year of history is
available with the newness of the tax.
Ja'œiy 7,169 $ 7,168 $ 2.W7
Febn..ery .~ 6,255 6,255 4,722
MW1 6,204 6,204 5,035
Þ¡>-il 7,ffi3 7,ffi3 3,673
M¡y 10,383 7,383 6,310
Jlre 4,541 7,351 7,383 3,595
JUy 5,401 8,584 6,3:1> 4,358
Þ<Jg.JSI 5,689 ji- 7,894 2.039 258",
5ept..roer 8,538 8,894 00'%
Q;t- 7,613 9,OO4 00',
~ 8,971 13,463 8,800 0.0',
C€œrrtJer 6.428 11,004 6,976 00',
c_i>IòI)l: $;< '.$c 1~5I!l+: . .,~,"$ .:!2,7œ 58.3",
T"""""""""""""" &-?
Citv of Federal War
Au~ust 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
Utility Tax
Utility tax received througli August totals $4,214,634, which is $117,008 or 2.9% above the budget estimate of $4,097,626.
Compared to 2000, utility tax receipts have increased $473,155 or 12.6%. Cellular taxes exceed the budgetary estimates by
$164,625 or 33.7%, a growth lTend consistent with prior years. Gas taxes exceed the budgetary estimates by $201,683 or 35.4%
due to the two large rate increases implemented in the past 18 months. ConlTary to expectations, the eleclTical utility tax dropped
below the 2000 collections. This is primarily due to the conservation efforts instituted during the energy crisis.
T"""""'" """"",...""","",J"'y
Utility Tax Revenues
Through August 2001
Gas
18.3%
Cellular
15.5%
Garbage
5.6%
&-6)
Ow of Federal Wav
Au!!ust 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
State Shared Revenue
State shared revenues collected total $3,731,749 and are exceeding budgetary estimates by $727,335 or 24.2%. The majority of
the variance is due to the $470,179 received in July for local government financial assistance, and all shared revenues are higher
than budgeted.
'-"""'Y"""<3""~I""'.2000}fa""2001_"-
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
STATE-SHARED REVENUES
1996-2001
IIVeh Uc Fees
. Fuel Tax
CC<imnal
J"tico
C Eoua!;,,'on
.Uquo<
'"
<J)
<J)
"
<¡:
0
0
N
r--
<J)
<J)
ex>
<J)
<J)
<J)
<J)
<J)
0
0
0
N
C.
'0
<¡:
0
0
N
"WET
G -/b
Citv of Federal Wav
AUflust 1001 Monthlv Financial Report
Court Revenue
Court revenue is $21,064 or 3.7% above year-to-date budget projections of $567,234 from fines and forfeitures. Total court
revenue collected amounts to $691,824 that is $98,387 above the year-to-date budget of $593,438 and above last year's activity by
$63,185 or 10.1 % through August. This is primarily due to the inclusion of adult probation services (BI, Inc.) and Traffic School
Admin Fees. The base line court revenue is $32,706 or 5.3% below 2000 collection primarily due to the reduction in traffic
citations. DUI and other misdemeanors collected through August total $107,232 that is $37,196 or 53.1% above the year-to-date
budget of $70,036. Criminal costs collected year-to-date total $56,790 that is $21,317 or 60.1% above the budget estimate of
$35,473. Parking infractions increased $27,086 or 137.4% above the year-to-date budget of $19,707. Traffic and Non-Parking are
below the year-to-date budget of $378,312 by $46,857 (12.4%), but are offset by Traffic School revenue that totals $74,488 year-
to-date.
. '"""""" "", "","",.. ",...."," """" ,..", """""'"'"....""...,"....m",,",..",m """""".,"'"",,""'",'" ."",, """ ",..,..'
,"",""',"","""m'",","""",","", ",m,',",","m'"',,""".,""","",'"""""',""","
COURT REVENUE
YTD Through August
700,000 iiiI
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
a
1996 1998 2000
0 Traffic School Admj
Fee
.prObation..s. e. rV.ice.s
.Court Revenue
C,"""",CooOs'
""'"
27,;517
19.300
"'"
31.221
42.57S
71,325
36.644
67.626
6.100
42.061
67.6f5I
","
--',
r___"Fœ
2.'"
5.269
137.4
53."
4."" 14.'"
56."" 21.317 00.1%
4.960 (23,561) -82.6
00.974 00.974 "'
22,553 ß.651) ,13.'"
. Ii-!
'om.._-~- -~-"..""""
G-I(
Citv of Federal War
Au!!ust 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Building Permits and Plan Check Fees
Building pennit revenues collected total $701,138, which is below the budget estimate by $72,508 or 9.4%. This does not include
year-to-date pass through revenues of $78,508 for expedited and environmental review. Revenues collected for expedited review
are not budgeted nor are the offsetting expenses. Building pennits, which includes mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade pennits
total $339,806 through the end of August. This is a decrease of $59,917 or 15.0% compared to the adopted budget of $399,723.
Electrical pennits total $65,957, which is below budget by $28,112 or 29.9%. Plan check fees collected through August total
$233,223 that is $12,342 or 5.6% above the adopted budget of $220,882. Significant building pennits during the month of August
include 2 commercial construction projects such as St. Francis' 3 story ambulatory surgery building with a value of $5,114,251;
and two Lloyd Enterprise projects valued at $392,408 and $822,177 respectively. A more complete pennit activity report will be
included in this report on a quarterly basis.
.Æn.ay
Fàmry
Mrd1
Jl JiI
MIy
.Ire
.uy
Pq:¡J;t
~
0ictJa'
~
cm.rtJe-
1.. æ,3:13 $- iÐ,934_f-!-_- 54,81~$-
- - - :: :~-~-- :;-
51,COO 93,dJJ, 62,8'<;1
---I fíJ,28) ---52,319--- fíJ,!m--
-.-..-=-=S.-.-._'-.'.":.---,~.___7.-.,-.,'. ~1__.--.~.:_.~--..:_-,;".=
-~=+~- 1--1------- -
~-~~~~~ -~Ef ~~~ ,=~i~'
n___- 49.6131 -- 47,978,-----52,975 ----
77,ffil $
95,739.
- 144,848 '
- 81\.404
_161,lœ
165,674
115,ZE
134,783
9),216
52,3:13
87,017
iÐ,19:J
:Ego/,
68,683, $
64,!!19.,
100,5ffi
100,334 .
ffi,275.
92,114
101,765
63,482;
11Z411
119.,502 .
72,9:0 .
72,125
:Ego/,
G-[?-
Citv of Federal Wav
Aul!ust 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
ROW Permits and Fees
Overall Public Works permits and fees collected through August total $259,806, which is $85,469 or 49.0% above the year-to-date
budget of $174,337. Pass-through revenues of $15.962 for expedited review are not included in the permits and fees. Plan review
fees collected total $60,071 that is $47,843 or 44.3% below the budget estimate ($107,913) for the current period.
$ .12,719
23,627
10,708
14,751
21.158
_8,283
29.676
18,645
- 15,252
J4,04~
.13,524
14,832
_A¡Jril
MaX
June
.July
August
Septel11b~u ----
October
November
-----.------- --
December
$....2-CJ4.1- $
8.583
26,504
9,079,
9,551 '
9,977
12,353
27,438
26,180
.15,049
18,019
19,049
16.188 $
8.437
12,347,
19,977
26.621
26,339
21.002
26.631
25,233
21,878
28.332
19,968
::.-.'..:.~.~_[2...'.$ -.-~.1,-~,:~.'.~1h- is. ...j~..~.:-.~...~...-...'$...-.. ;--:~.~.j.. ¡----
38,7132 2~~__37,106. ---12,~01$
16,286 22,313 I 18,674 ' 23,964 , $
~-~~~i-=~;:~:~:.._~-::;~r=--~~~~ .I.
~j::: -~H~i - . ~~~~t------~~~~}r i- .
~~:~ -- ;~:~~l u ~~~~- - .-
18,508 17,101 I 21,019
38,6909,5131 16,137
84.5%
-52.3%
28.3%
20.1%
80.9%
46.0%
86.0%
O.OOh
0.0%
& -IJ
Citv of Federal Wav
Au!!ust 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
General governmental expenditures through August total $23,070,399 or 57.1 % of the annual operating budget of$40,378,211.
Operating expenditures are below the year-to-date budget of $25,077,076 by $2,006,676 or 8.0%. When compared to 2000,
expenditures are down $21,498 or less than .1 %.
oty Council
Oty Manager
Mmicipal Court-Operations
Management Services
Ovil/OilTinal Legal Services
Corrm. Development Services
Police Services
Jail Services
Parks and Recreation
Public Works
Oty Over1ay Program
SnoN & I œ Rerroval
Solid Waste
Hotel/rvbtel Lodging Tax
Surface Water Man~
Debt Serviœ
Durres Bay Centre
Knutzen FalTil Theatre
SUblotål .' i'
Other Finæci Uses'
TOtáI . ures&OIherlJse$
ures
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT
Period Ending August 31, 2001
200) l~c-~2OO1BP~h'
Actual. i::ÎIi1nual::::::Aug<iS!:::
156,409 $ 223,232 $ 178,001 I $
284,307 698,971 470,328 !
462,596 966,958 694,653
1,006,401 1,733,215 1,134,248
811,632 1,266,589 838,028
1,918,060 3,582,627 2,404,406
8,314,556 13,483,627 8,685,201
927,699 1,638,938 715,178
2,037,708 3,259,444 2,200,698
1,923,786 3,653,771 2,215,445
1,248,918 2,005,169 1,103,706
6,493
188,078
40,424
1,073,100
2,253,288
321,412 ¡
117,030
23,091,897 .
11,425,326
$ 34,517223
$
Other Rnancing LI3es,... those actMties COlSidered one tirœ in nature.
-----------
-------
Variance..
. Fav6rable{Unfavol'llble).
--DOllars {i) . - Percent (%)
$ 13,291 7.5°A
33,595 7.1"1.
(24,335) -3.5°A
37,281 3.3"1.
73,644 8.8°A
473,565 19.7"1.
(79,145) -O.9°A
(90,579) -12.7"A
137,138 6.2"1.
189,539 8.6"1.
845,096 76.6"1.
rJ
17.4"1.
rJ
26.8"1.
rJ
-26.2"1.
-13.5°A
8;Q"A
rJ
.5;9%
46,627
60,499
383,574
(80,765)
(12,349)
2,006,676
2;006,676
$40,000.000
COMPARISON OF 2001 OPERATING EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL
Total 2001 Budgeted Expend;tu,.. $40,378,211
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25.000.000
$20.000.000
$15.000.000
$10.000.000
$-
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
---
c;-rlf
Citv of Federal Wav
Aul!ust 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
City Council
Variance Analvsis:
City Council Legislative Services expenditures total $164,800, which is below the budgetary estimate by $13,291 or 7.5%. The
third quarter clean air assessment for calendar year 2001 was prepaid in July, representing savings of $2,036 over this reporting
period.
Municipal Court
Variance Analvsis:
Municipal Court Operations expenditures total $718,988, which is above the budgetary estimate of $694,653 by $24,335 or 3.5%.
Professional services include approximately $81K for the BI contract for probationary services through the month of August, but
this has offsetting revenues. Minor savings can be found in one-time funded internal service charges for equipment for the new
traffic school court clerk (funded with traffic school revenues).
City Manager:
Variance Analvsis:
Activity through August totals $436,733 and is below the budget estimate by $33,595 or 7.1 %. Savings are due partially to the
Assistant City Manager position that was filled April 30"', and the Management Intern open position.
Civil/Criminal Legal
Variance Analvsis:
Activity through August totals $764,384 and is below the budget estimate by $73,644 or 8.8%. Savings are due primarily to salary
and benefits savings in Civil Legal Services, and outside legal counsel/litigation specialist costs that total $30,398 or 34.5% of the
annual budget of $88,000. Also, public defense attorney services have expended $137,103 or 58.8% of the annual budget of
$233,278.
Management Services
Variance Analvsis:
Activity through August totals $1,096,967 that is $37,281 or 3.3% below the year-to-date budget estimate of$I,134,248. Although
Human Resources division has expended its budget for job announcements and for miscellaneous professional services for the
various state fees, savings can be found primarily in one-time funded internal service charges for the Kronos Timekeeping System,
Document Imaging System and the Eden Financial System upgrade.
Community Development
Variance Analvsis:
Through August, CD is below their year-to-date budget estimate of $2,404,406 by $473,565 or 19.7%. The savings are primarily
due to unfilled positions in Human Services during part of this year, and in one-time programs that have not been spent to-date
such as planned action SEPA contracted services, PAA planning area, compo plan update, and code amendments.
Parks and Recreation
Variance Analvsis:
Parks Operations expenditures through the month of August total $2,063,559, which is $137,138 or 6.2% below the year-to-date
budget estimate ($2,200,698). Savings can be found in Park Maintenance (60.2% expended year-to-date), in Celebration Park
operations which is just 64.2% expended to date, and in various one-time funded programs such as tree replacement and e-
commerce recreation class registration that have not been spent to date, but anticipate increased activity in the falL
Dumas Bay Centre: Operating expenditures through August total $388,994 which exceeds the year-to-date budget estimate
($308,229) by $80,765 or 26.2%. This is primarily due to an increase in professional services, specifically catering, custodial and
cleaning charges, as well as repairs and maintenance charges. The increase in expenditures is offset by an increase of revenues of
$90,200 or 29.7%.
Knutzen Family Theatre: Operating expenditures through August total $103,887 or 62.9% of the adopted budget ($165,048). The
current expenditures are above the year-to-date budget estimate ($91,538) by $12,348 or 13.5%. The increase in expenditures is
offset by an increase in revenues of$14,983. This year-to-date budget is now based on a two-year trends analysis as opposed to a
straight-line allocation of the annnal budget. Some savings can be found in supplies which are only 25.4% expended through
August, and in internal service fund charges which are 61.4% expended year-to-date.
G7- f~
Citv of Federal Wav
Aullus/ 2001 Mon/hlv Financial Report
The table below summarizes recreation and cultural services and Dumas Bay Centre activity, and their related recovery rates:
Dumas Bay Centre 474,587 388,994 82.0% -----T
102.9'1"
Knutzen Family Theatre 165,0481 103,887 62.9% 39.7%
I TOTAL DUMAS BAY CENTR~ $ 639,635 1 $ 492,881' 77.1%1 86.8%1
Arts Commission 70,200 22,817 32.5% nla
Community Center
--Senior Services
Special Populations
Youth Commission
Adult Athletics
Youth Athletics
Aquatics
Celebration Park
~rts & Special Events
,Còommunity Recreation
Red, White & Blue
fi~~~1~!!~lillITIW'mg':n¡ "
RECREATION & CULTU SERVICE PROGRAMS
23,500 r 8,085" 34.4%' - --7'1:224: 44,155 62.0%-----33.0'1,!-- 18.3%
-7~200 ! - Æ~8J-- 86~8'10 -- 52,066 ' 37,914 72~J- - 13H8%'= 11';:5%
16,8501 14,316 j 85.0% 55,520 41,938 75.5%1 30.3'4 34.1%
500"-- .. , 0.0% - 1,800 ~ 893 49.6%1 27~8%! nn/a
-174,500' 158,060 90.6'/~" ---95-;-354] 93,614 98,2'1,' 11!3.00/,I 168:8'/,
6~500 ' 70,974'- 117,30/,. n~42!J: 36,860 4370;;--' 7ffo¡;=--192.6%
2,000 162 8.1%, 20,360 28.761 141.3'i'<~ 9.8%. 0:6'1,
~"HQ.o.O " 25,706 45.10/,'267;947. 141,256 52.70/; __21.:30//18.2%
39,100, 17,661 45.2% 74,254 71,853 96.8% 52.7%r 24.6%
205,046; 142,125 69.3% -196,606 112.170 57.1'k] 104:'3%,126.7%
25,700 ¡ 13,859 53:9% - ~o¡): 48,329, 1Ù.:W;- '62-:-4O¡;:-- 28.70/,
"i:n ~..,¡~tJ¡n~¡, . 'iilHI!I!!¡.1!J~H::'~~¡~~;;¡'=:~;~¡m::m:M¡.I¡,:m:!:!!1!J$-
332,816 212,646 63.9% nla' nla
Ro""",, '0 0O' 'oc"'o 9r"" or 0""U09 "'",to" ""peo","", '0 001 'oc','o ,,"',,' oq"~ I"",fo,, or olh" '0""'"' oooIOMo",.
Recreation and Cultural Services:
Revenues are $457,195 or $12,728 (2.7%) below the year-to-date budget of$469,923. Direct program expenditures total $657,743
that is 68.8% of the annual budget of $960,761 not including indirect costs. Recreation fees have recovered 69.5% of direct
program costs. Including administrative expenditures totaling $212,646, the total recreation recovery ratio is 52.5%.
Dumas Bav Centre:
Operating revenues total $394,140 or $90,200 (29.7%) above the year-to-date budget of $303,941. Operating expenditures total
$388,994 or 26.2% above the year-to-date budget of $308,229. The Dumas Bay Centre has recovered 101.3% of all operating
costs.
Knutzen Familv Theatre:
Operating revenues through August total $47,320 or $14,983 (46.3%) above the year-to-date budget of $32,337. Operating
expenditures total $103,887 or $12,349 (13.5%) above the year-to-date budget of $91,538. The Knutzen Family Theatre has
recovered 45.5% of all operating costs.
Public Works
Variance Ana/vsis
Public Works Operations: Expenditures are below the August budget estimate ($2,215,445) by $189,539 or 8.6%, and have
expended $2,025,906 or 55.4% of its annual appropriation ($3,653,771). Savings can be found in the one-time funded programs
that are 5.8% expended to date such as transportation model update and tree replacement and various contracted services payments
which are only 37.7% expended through August.
Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are below the budget projection of $268,021 by 17.4% or $46,627. The
projected savings are due to the timing of grant expenditures and will be used during the special recycling and composting bins
events scheduled in September and October this year.
SWM Operations: Expenditures are below budget projections by $383,574 or 26.8% of the August estimate of $1,431,959. The
savings is due primarily to unfilled budgeted positions within the division and the NPDESIESA one-time funded program.
&-Ir:,
Citv of Federal Wav
Aal!ast 2001 Monthlv Financial ReDOrt
The table below presents a year-to-date analysis of the Public Works and Surface Water Management (SWM) contmcts with King
County, WSDOT and private vendors. Most on-going maintenance takes place during the spring and sunnner months:
ad Safety/Pavement Marking
-, "",sportation - Expedífea-pjan Review'(1 i .
TrafficGounts/Gonsultárits--'-
School Safety/Traffic MainTenance - KG
44,868
55,1 98 ': u
10ßOÖ¡--
406,500 '
(847) -1.9%
~h8f3 _n 3,3%
- I -0,0%
, 194,529 : --,- 47.9%
Street Maintenanc,,-:, Private Gontractors (2)
Street Maintenance - WSDOT
Structure Maintenà¡¡~
237,687
-1'15,036, n
119,3'67 '
118,825
'20,090
119,000-"
50.0%
- -17,5%
99.7%
Pavement Management S stem
15,000 $
15,000
100.0%
Solid Waste Litter Gontrol
195,811
44,652
22,8%
Water Utility Billing - KG
StáieHlghway Maintenance: WSDot
Water ¡":nalysis -, ,
Si,:-Sweeping-;C;atcti13asin, Maiihole & Pipes
65,000 L--- 213,196 , i3.4"10
,30,000 ¡ , ,--", _,10'°m=5 " ,- ,,33:5%,
3,871. " 4,396 113.4%
350;¡;05 - -- -- 71,473 , ,---- 20.4%
(1) Expedited plan review service expenditures have matching revenues
(2) Private Contracts lor streets maintenanceltraffic control (1IB,B8?), RÇJW vegetation. mowing and tree
maintenance (1145,000), stump grinding, irrigation services, dangerous tree removal (110,000), tree
replacement (120,000), small works projects (114.000), Right-ol-way contracled inspection (12'.000),
noxious week control (IB,OOO) and Pavement Management System (15,000)
(3) Private Contractors for sidewalk, ram ps. curb and gutter maintenance (1112,B9B) and fences, guardraits,
barriers and retaining wall maintenance (IB,B71)
Public Safety & Jail Services
Variance Analvsis:
Police Services has expended $8,764,346 through August, which is exceeding the year-to-date budget projection of $8,685,201 by
$79,145. Valley Connn has been prepaid through the month of August, representing savings of $3,724 per month ($29,792 over
this 8 month period).
The table below represents police operating revenue collected through the month of August.
olective Licenses 4
Concealed Pistol License B,B32 B,110 4.124 2,177 7,943 5,534
Alien Firearm Lice"e 15 53 30
Police Repo,1 Copies 3,571 5,OBB 5,17B 5,974 11 ,318 7,385
P holographs 11 144 34B 41 519 200
Fingerpri"ts 1,842 1,818 1,875 I,B94 3,425 2,720
Police Security 25,125 31.323 83,408 253,524 2B7.048 302,093
Slale Sei,ures 52,2B9 IB,522 3B,057 101,404 51,011 92,411
Federal Sei,ures 799
Traffic 5 chool 32,400 33,925 74,488
Interest Earnings 47B 1,902 11 ,297 10,202 1 S,985
False Alarms 3.445 8,OBB 11,500
Olher M iscellaneo", (75) 38 29 2.018 12,411 4,5B4
Des M o'"es Conlract 4B,200 11,550
Donalions & ConlribuUo" 1 ,874 12,810 9,500 3,078
Operating Tra"sfer I"-Grants C511
COPS & LLE8G Grants 209.47B 215,B2B
City of Federal Way
AUt!"st 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Jail Services.
Jail services are above the 7-month budget estimate ($715,178) by $90,579 or 12.7%. The total expended ($805,757) includes
King County invoices (December through June), Chelan County and Fife jail services paid through the month of June. The chart
below reflects 7 months of jail costs and maintenance, as of the end of August.
Jail Costs vs Maintenance Days
Through August
Operating Expenditures By Category
The chart below shows operating expenditures and financing uses through August 31, 200 I by category or object code:
050 City Manager Contingency Fund 784,541 1.5% 0.0%
010 Contra Account (149,621) (105,805) -0.3% 70.7%
100 Personnel Services 16,545,935 10,751,325 32.0% 65.0%
200 Benefits 3,423,777 2,265.726 6.6% 66.2%
300 Supplies 1,141,426 474,454 2.2% 41.6%
400 Other Services and Charges 5,167,436 2,698,924 10.0% 52.2%
500 Inter90vernmental ServiceslTaxes 3,327,860 1,781,036 6.4% 53.5%
552 Interfund Contributions 10,137,539 8,705,862 19.6% 85.9%
561 Residual Equity Transfers 460,951 159,413 0.9% 34.6%
600 Capital Outlays 2,016,068 184,750 3.9% 9.2%
700 Debt Service - Principal 3,094,362 1,546,832 6,0% 50,0%
800 Debt Service - Interest 1,641,331 936,243 3,2% 57.0%
900 Interfund Svc Pa ments 4,183,882 2,688,505 8,1% 64,3%
Total 0 eratin Ex enditures I Uses 51,775,487 32,087,264 100,1% 62.0%
Personnel services and benefits, which comprises 38,6% of the operating budget, is 65.1 % expended, Included in this number are
salaries and wages, temporary help, seasonal help, overtime pay, overtime private security and tennination pay,
Other services and charges have expended only 52,2% of its annual budget ($5,167,436), with savings in City Manager, Law,
Parks, Public Works, SWM, and Public Safety,
Capilal outlays, which includes $1.8 million for the arterial streets overlay project, is 9.2% expended, We are anticipating
additional invoices in the month of September for the overlay project.
Internal service payments are currently at 64,3%, which represents 8 months of maintenance and operations expenses,
G-f~
Citv of Federal War
Aul!ust 2001 Monthlv Financial ReDort
~~tFf.!iltf;
lIebtSèiviee Auld; '¡t)
Special Revenue;
Arterial Street
UtilityTax (1)
Solid Waste & Recycling
Speciai Study ¡Gov. 1V)
HotellMotel Lodging Tax
2% for the Arts
CDBG
Paths & Trails
Strategic/Airport Reserve
SlmrOtl/iSÞ«i~R;¡Venue, Fund$
Capital Project;
Public Safety Facility
Downtown Revitalization
Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds
Celebration Park
Park Improvements
Surface Water Management
Transportation
SlmrOtl/iCiiPiUllf>(t>j<iéf$
Enterprise Funds;
Surface Water Management
Dumas Bay Centre Operations
Dumas Bay Centre Capital
Knutzen Family Theatre Capital
Knutzen Family Theatre Operations
Sii/)f(i/li/:EillWPrise:Fuilr;/$
Internal Semee Funds; (2)
Rjsk Management
Information Systems
Mail & Duplication
Fleet & Equipment
Buildings & Fumishings
Sii/)/(I/Ii/:(i'/Ieri'/alSemce:Fun(/$
rillaIAlli"Uffl!$ .
$
.6.7;zQ;<!4$>$
1S.~2.1187. . $.
.4;831.214 :
¡
1,366,1031
4,282,277
170,675
24,069
79,455
5,000
58,646
6,237
32,424 ,
8.Q24.W1:. .
1,855,085
396,545 '
316,391
856
149,225
2.716.1IJ3
2,616,396 'I
1,083,077
127,782 I
701,950
486,127
5.Q15.332
43;f)Q9.749 , $
. 19,4()8.089 . $
. 2.516.40S.:
258,610 '
4,436,2831
221,394 I
11,635
11,3031
-I
75,283 1
2,060,718 !
-: 7,IJ75;225 .
(415.825)$
2.114.808 .
1,107,494
(154,006)
(50,719)
12,434
68,153
5,000
(16,637)
6,237
(2,028,294)
(1.fI5(),336)
228,089
9,974
640
19,941
(498,850)
1,776,084
(894,839)
1;41.Q39
(926,493)
7,551
316,391
856
45,338
(556.357)
2,240,728
266,007
39,096
(151,291)
274,930
2.869.489
3,402,993
Ending FiJnd
Balance at
S/31/Q1 .
6.3P4.S2P
7.11Q2.327
1,594,988
4,253,254
240,823
123,482
126,637
24,274
(10,198)
38,651
(0)
6.391.91Q
6,563,617
1,359,404
20,599
180,739
381,704
7,154,131
8,966,069
2>/;621i;283
(175,099)
7,551
316,391
32,400
45,338
221i.561
3,893,267
1,718,327
192,667
1,673,356
1,244,536
6;722;152
$ :>01,114.(1$4
(1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service.
(2) Intemal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpose of fixed asset replacement.
. ¡;.7e7.522
751,394
31,544
762.936.
$
1,652,539
1,452,320
153,571
1,824,647
969,606
8;052.6113
. 50.771.061 . $
103,887
: .3;274.4ØQ
375,668
817,070
88.686
853,241
211,197
Z~;(J!;3,
. 39;ØQ!1.353 $
b-11
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES
OPERATING FUNDS
Through August 2001
1996-2001
Ope,atlng Revenues
Property Taxes
Sales Ta<
HotellMotel Lodging Ta,
Criminal Justice Sales Ta,
Inte'go,emmental
Re~ Estate E,dse Ta<
Gam~lng Ta<es
Ut;I;ty Ta,es
Court Re'enue
Building Pe"",ts/Fees-CD
E'pedited Re,'ew Fees-CD
ROW Pe""itsiFees-PW
E,pedlted Re,lew Fees-PW
Licenses
F,anchlse Fees
Re"eatlon Fees
Dumas Bay Cent,e
Knutten Family Theat..
Inte..st Eamings
AdmlnlCash Management Fees
SWM Fees
Refuse Collection Fees
ponce Se"ices
0",.,
T_I .fa ft........
..
Thealle
E, endltu,es
pe'allng Revenues om/iunde'l
0 mlln E, endltu,"s
Othe, Financing souICes
Othe, FInancing Uses
Ending Fund Balance
Sond W.,te
Snow &Ice
Arierial Sileet
UtilltyTa,
SWM
Path & Trails
SI'ategic Rese"e
Debt Se"ice
Dumas Bay Cent'e
ponce
P3
Inle,,"nd Loans
Un..se"ed
Tota' EndlnFund Balanc.
3,128,653
5,339,606
533,959
2,108,963
906,928
198,112
468,186
401,520
410,710
139,567
44,368
303,287
314,257
158,324
290,329
103,294
1,584,399
95,700
589,832
T7,l2O~T65 1
144,308
308,536
966,457
814,691
1,752,474
5,925,248
371,772
2,089,778
1,603,728
368,736
39,296
188,009
951,075
649,943
222,006
T5,396,057
724,T08
5,391,524
213,050
103,239
362,100
1,077,666
30,210
2,050,477
1,618,909
115,131
73,343
$ 56~T28
3,437,981
5,430,902
607,717
1,989,030
1,121,820
236,044
2,149,010
390,434
546,278
110,526
44,719
356,432
330,117
233,999
327,426
108,489
1,456,470
63,692
149,407
620,948
T',731,661 '
157,074
375,957
922,607
800,839
1,713,517
6,375,325
448,926
1,760,639
1,900,293
1,019,314
51,057
365,091
3,381,265
5,630,971
648,178
1,944,322
1,612,556
212,341
3,178,957
549,554
635,273
157,542
35,526
344,922
338,164
209,486
510,968
110,660
1,625,811
98,103
96,519
T,052,666
. 22;373;184
158,220
381,879 !
1,026,335 '
1,047,339
1,725,5"
7,245,619
520;151
1,863,748
2,050,54 I
450,794
29,787
174,703
3,557,241
6,214,084
15,631
706,008
2,029,104
1,445,579
966,742
3,532,394
562,461
983,351
62,799
155,675
40,345
107,823
353,299
462,468
312,941
24,597
718,407
112,320 1
1,710,775
99,048
223,298
100,297
. .24,"',.8.
151,163
377,768 ,
257,298
1,113,39.
823,405
1,942,334
7,837,644
776,817
2,011,309
1,942,600
1,030,017
17,045
151,404
3,672,303
6,874,166
65,604
1,065,926
2,351,613
1,431,606
1,006,156
3,741,479
626,639
685,158
81,225
191,835
32,057
64,743
366,549
415,721
305,931
39,321
745,940
99,335
1,624,892
83,681
525,356
44,280
'26~143~517
961,085 884,691
719,3791 1,040,824
273,335 1 258,711
_I
17,864,438 18,85',""
1,867,223
3,524,944
3,106,818
3,514,275 !
,
2,822,839 '
2,034,372
294,316
103,530
477,375
2,120,030
1,566,522 2,276,459
6,153 12,555
2,022,389 2,025,496
2,966,805 , 5,283,482
83;142 'I 13,286
1,082,207 786,441
300,000 , 300,000
10,000 ' 10,000
3,782,468 3,532,267
12681.53TI~" 5237:
296,991
73,358
470,902
2,381,7.0
3,051,620
7,200,394
9,905,347
90,000
1,589,767
3,085,827
1,900,000
1,450,000
6,016,400
865,784
1,099,804
259,583
174,809
468,902
611,696
488,300
65,475
841,319
476,306
3,165,155
153,013
423,516
58,599
"",,"0,1"
223,232
698,971
966,958
1,733,215
1,266,589
3,582,627
13,483,627
1,538,938
3,259,444
3,653,771
2,005,169
405,777
107,702
2,184,014
4,528,541
474,587
165,048
40,378,211
11,985
5,381,058 7,230,373 6,490,930
9,253,8131 11,425,3261 11,397,276
1
299,842
100,000
349,431
2,830,148
1,643,113
22,353
2,028,204
5,748,308
47,775
148,150
300,000
10,000
4,009,345
'813H.9
196,303
95,575
456,790
4,944,684
812,213
31,474
2,033,832
4,561,433
35,745
800,229
300,000 '
10,000 I
7,343,942
$21122220
259,377
41,859
6,220,888
324,408
41,414
6,418,013
20,140
669,334
300,000
10,000
1,434,898
1H40.~~0 $
3,610,030
6,486,800
56,146
1,027,869
1,976,545
1,242,156
953,216
4,097,626
593,438
773,647
174,337
58,922
429,580
469,923
303,941
32,337
650,828
317,536
1,583,371
104,721
203,944
44,685
25;191,59'
178,091
470,328
694,653
1,134,248
838,028
2,404,406
8,685,201
715,178
2,200,698
2,215,445
1,103,706
268,021
71,801
1,431,959
2,265,545
308,229
91,538
25,077,07.
314,524
4,953,822
9,016,665
3,810,030
6,810,474
88,854
1,114,547
2,617,202
1,163,667
1,483,064
4,214,634
691,824,
701,1381
78,508
2~;::~~ !
58,922 '
429,580
457,195
394,140
47,320
850,828
317,536
1,583,371
100,049
534,112
44,685
27,..1,4461
164,800 I
436,733
,,~~~:;~~
764,384
1,930,841
8,764,346
805,757
2,063,559
2,025,906
258,610
221,394
11,303
1,048,385
2,265,545
388,994
103,887
23,010,"9
I
-I
323'6741
32,708
86,617
640,657
(78,488)
529,846 '
117,008
98,386 '
172,508)
18,508
85,469
15,962
(D),
(12'728)1
90,200
14,983
(4,672).
330,168 '
2,215~.41 .
13,291
33,595
(24,335)'
37,281
73,6441
473,585 !
(79,,45)
190,579)
137,138
189,539,
845,0961
46,627
60,499 '
383,574
180,765)
12,349
2,001,.7. 1
4,597,". 4,282,523
4,953,822
9,016,8651
1
224,740 '
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla'
nla:
nla
nla
nla I
nla
300,000 I. nla
10,000 nla ,
7,082,360 nla
$2131.511i¡$428252i4i
1,594,988
4,253,254
1175,099)'1
38,651
7,902,321
85,290 :
0.0%
5.0%
58.3%
8,4%
32.4%
-6.3%
55.6%
2.9%
16.6%
-9.4%
nla
49.0%
nla
0.0%
0.0%
-2.7%
29,7%
46.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-4.5%
1619%
0,0%
. g;O~.
7.5%
7.1%
-35%
3.3%
8.8%
19,7%
-0.9%
-127%
6.2%
8.6%
16.6%
0.0%
17.4%
64.3%
28.8%
0.0%
-26,2%
-13.5%
8,0%
1361,.%
0,0%
-I
0.0%
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nla
nJa
(~-2õ
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
October 9,2001
Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee
David H. Moseley, City Manager
Tho Kraus, Financial Management Supervisor ~
To:
Via:
From:
Subject: Addendum to August 2001 Monthly Financial Report
The August Monthly Financial Report reflected Jail Services with an unfavorable
variance of $90,579. This is due to an error in the budget estimate, which included only 5
months of activity while actual jail bills paid were for 7 months.
The correct comparison with 7 months of budget is actually a favorable variance of
$105,092.
Jail Services
$
1,638,938 $
910,768 $
805,676 $
105,092
11.5%
In addition, the July and August bills have since been paid. The updated monthly
comparison indicates a favorable variance of $204,913, with a projected 12 months
savings of$275,000.
~Z1
/(p
..M~~TINQP A!~.:... Qct.o.~~.!þ.~. 991....
ITEM#
;]LCd)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Tourism Euhancement Grant Award
CATEGORY:
X CONSENT
RESOLUTION
COUNCIL BUSINESS
ORDINANCE
PUBLIC HEARING
OTHER
BUDGET IMPACT:
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
ATTACHMENTS:
....!..:...!:-.<:,~g!!,:g!¡}J(1\ ~\li~<:,ry ç <:,~itt.~f:.I3:~~CJ..'!'!!I~':'~¡} ~i ':J.!l¡¡"!':~t~f:.!I1rf:.~gr¡¡"!l t ¡¡.. pp 1 ic ~ tl<:' n s: m
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
Eight thousand dollars was set aside for the Tourism Enhancement Grant as part of the 2001 Lodging Tax
budget. The Federal Way Chamber of Commerce, under contract with the City, is coordinating the grant
application, review, and award process. Attached is the memorandum from Delores Shull to the Lodging Tax
Advisory Committee recommending the award of the 2001 grants to Pacific NW Association of Master
Swimmers for $2,500, and Pacific NW Synchronized Swimming Association for $5,000. The $500 balance will
be carried forward to the 2002 grant fund.
The Lodging Tax Committee approved the awards, with Chair Gates and member Reid recusing themselves for
their association with the applicants. The Committee further requested a Grant Review Sub-Committee to refine
the grant process and procedure to I) establish a clear time line for grant submittal and review, 2) clarify the
award criteria, 3) recommend the conditions for use of funds when total resources exceed total costs of an event.
The sub committee met on September 21 and made revision to the grant process which will be presented to the
Lodging tax advisor committee for approval on October 3.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward the recommended Tourism
Enhancement Grant award of $2500 to Pacific NW Association of Master Swimmers and $5,000 to Pacific NW
Synchronized Swimming Association to fnll Conncil for approval.
PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of the recommended Tourism Enhancement Grant award of$2500 to
Pacific NW Association of Master Swimmers and $5,000 to Pacific NW Synchronized Swimming Association. "
CITYMANAGERAPPROVAL:m~. ......mm.....
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
- APPROVED
- DENIED
- TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
- MOVED TO SECOND READING (o,dinanceonly)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST READING
ENACTMENT READING
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
September 26, 2001
Finance, Economic Development andJegional Affairs Committee
David H. Moseley, City Manager ~~..þ
Iwen Wang, Management Services Director ~
Tourism Enhancement Grant Award
Via:
From:
Subject:
Eight thousand dollars was set aside for the Tourism Enhancement Grant as part of the 2001 Lodging
Tax budget. The Federal Way Chamber of Commerce, under contract with the City, is coordinating the
grant application, review, and award process. Attached is the memorandum from Delores Shull to the
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee recommending the award of the 2001 grants to Pacific NW
Association of Master Swimmers for $2,500, and Pacific NW Synchronized Swinging Association for
$5,000. The $500 balance will be carried forward to the 2002 grant fund.
The Lodging Tax Committee approved the awards, with Chair Gates and member Reid recusing
themselves for their association with the applicants. The Committee further requested a Grant Review
Sub-Committee to refine the grant process and procedure to 1) establish a clear time line for grant
submittal and review, 2) clarity the award criteria, 3) recommend the conditions for use of funds when
total resources exceed total costs of an event. The sub committee met on September 21 and made
revision to the grant process which will be presented to the Lodging tax advisor committee for approval
on October 3.
Attachment: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Recommendation and the three grant applications.
Committee Recommendation:
Forward the recommend Tourism Enhancement Grant award to full Council for approval.
OJ
f:C:tiMember .'
~.
Committee Member
k:\finance\fincommt\200 J \200 I teg award.doc
200lteg award
9/26/200 I
C\
Federal Way
(..:r~'~Tj1;1=1~-
enhancing community prosperity
August 17,2001
To: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
From: Tourism Enhancement Grant Review Committee
Members present: Dave Armstrong, Parks & Recreation; Mike Dunwiddie, KCAC; Scott Brown,
Best Western Executel; Shawn Cummins, Courtyard Marriott; Joann Piquette, Arts Commission
Absent: David DeGroot, Bonsai Collection Staff: Iwen Wang, City of Federal Way, Delores
Shull, Federal Way Chamber
The TEG Review Committee met August 14, 2001 to rev,iew the following grants.
1. Celebration Park Banner Request: $5000
2. Pacific NW Association of Master Swimmers: $2500
3. Pac NW Synchronized Swimming Assn VII FINA World Championships: $5000
After review and discussion, the committee recommends approval of Grant 2 and Grant 3 at
the requested amounts.
"Jfl,~- , "';' ...1", r ,
~~r,,""'ll. (\(Ui\ '4..L(",,"~\[\,-l!,)* "'\'r"¡,,.t .L" ,T"ìOC'~",-,.
Recdmmendations will be forwarded to the LTAC for action at the next meeting 8/22/01.
.
II
Delores Shull
President/CEO
Federal Way Chamber
~~ber'
Comm! tee Mcmbc,
APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE:
KIFINANCEILTM\2001182201Itac packetdoc
c-~ ß"¡
Federal Wax
(81: r~'~'j'~)::1~-
enhancing community prosperity
August 8,2001
Dear Tourism Grant Committee members:
Thank you for your participation in the tourism grant process. As previously
notified, the Grant committee will be meeting on Tuesday, August 14, 2001 at 1
p.m. at the City of Federal Way to review the three grants received for the latest
round, and to make a recommendation about the grants for the Lodging Tax
Advisory Committee.
The grants received are enclosed for your review prior to the meeting. Please
let me know if you have any questions.
If we have time, I would like this committee to also review the revisions made to
the grant application for the next round.
Thanks again for your participation as we make Federal Way a great place to
live, learn, work and play, and of course visit.
7¡;kdlæ4
Delores Shull
President/CEO
Enc: TEG applications
~~~~:~:~""".".,w.'.mŒ'.oU."".".""~n".=._.""""""""""""""",,,"~m.."""".....~,=.="'~.,""","""'..""""",,,,~"""rm"""-:'
34004 16th Avenue South, Suite 101 . Federal Way, WA 98003 . P.O. Box 3440 . Federal Way, WA 98063 I!I
[2531 838-2605 . Fax [253) 661-9050 . Ema;! Fedway@federalwaychamber.cam' Web Page www.federalwaychamber.cam ~
C-]
Has this event ever been held in King County'J.
Yes
Pierce County?- NO
If yes, when:
Month: August
May
Year:
1992
1997
Venue: King County Aquatic City:
Center
Federal Way
EVENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Is a host fee required? yes
Ifso, what amount? $ 8/ en tr¡;¡n t
% ofDroceeds
What is the projected number of tickets that will be sold?
zero
Average ticket price: $
0.00
Event's total estimated expenses: $~~ 000., 00
Amount of expenses local host is responsible for? $
100%
Events total estimated revenues?$ 86,000.00
What portion of the event's proceeds will be kept by the local host? $
100%
VENUE INFORMATION
..
Proposed local venue: King County AQuatic Center
Location:
Federal Way, WA
Proposed dates:
August 15 - 19, 2001
Have you confImled the availability of the proposed dates at the primary venue? ~ NO
Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues?
YES
c~
TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competition and practice sites) $ 10,000.00
C -4-
ECONOMIC IMPACT
How many athletes/participants will the event attract?
1150
How many team will the event attract?
100
How far away will the (athlete/participants) travel (local, regional, national, international)? in t ern a t i on a 1
How many spectators will the event attract?
500
How far away will spectators travel from? in tern a t i 0 na 1
How many staff people will the event attract?
250
Of the numbers listed above, what percentage will require overnight lodging?
Athletes
80
95
%
%
Teams
Spectators
70
10
%
%
Event Staff
I GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED:
$2500.00
How will these grant funds be utilized? To offset expenses of the event, including
facility rental, provision of EMS services,
and other expenses.
VERY IMPORT ANT: It is the intent of this grant program to enable an organization to produce
events and activities they could not otherwise provide but not for the organization to profit from
the event. Therefore, the undersigned agrees to return the portion of the grant, when added to
other event revenues including other contributions, exceeds total event costs. This will enable the
amount returned to the grant fund for future distribution.
Please list the other sources of financial support (sponsorship, etc.) which you have pursued:
We have also applied for a grant from
Source:
Tacoma-Pier'ce County Amateur Athletic Fund
c.ç
Committed: YES G) Amount: $ 2500. 00
Committed: YES NO Amount: $
Committed: YES NO Amount: $
The undersigned certify the infonnation provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based
on history of similar events and activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local
conditions.
Applicant's Signature
l~
.ï ..,
I \..
c.
~-crM< G. ~
Applicant'sTitle:Meet Di rector
Dme: January 24, 2001
President, Meet Organizing Committee
c-~
GRANT APPLICATION
GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS: Read the entire packet, including the attached selection
criteria, before completing this application. Please type or print. Answer each question to the best of
your ability. The BOARD does not provide funding for tournament entry fees, travel, lodging, meals,
unifonns, equipment, coaches salaries, facility upgrades or any other capital purposes. If a question is not
applicable to your event, simply write "N/A" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver your
completed application to:
Attn: TEGrant Application
Greater Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
34004 16th Ave. S., Suite 101
Federal Way,WA. 98063
APPLICANT'S NAME:
Paulette Roche
ORGANIZATION:
Pacific Northwest Synchronized Swimming Association IRC 50Ic(3)
Non-profit IRC 50Ic(3), local governing body oj US Synchronized
Swimming, Inc.
STREET ADDRESS:
9049 NE 145th PL, Kenmore, WA 98028
DAYTIME Telephone:
(425) 488-9138
Fax
(425) 487-4820
Official Event Name:
VII FIN A Junior World Synchronized Swimming Championships
Briefly describe the event (type of sport, male, female, co-ed, etc): Athletes Jrom over 40 countries will
be coming to Federal Way to compete in this international event to be held at the Weyerhaeuser King
County Aquatic Center August 20-26, 2001. This seventh biennial championship marks the first time the
event has been held in North America. The United States Olympic Committee and national governing
body oj US Synchronized Swimming placed the successJul bid with FINA, the international governing
body oj Olympic Aquatic sports, in 1999. The Pacific Northwest Association and King County Parks
Department agreed to host the event and were selected in March 2000.
Scope of Event (check 1):
International
Previous Hosts: YEAR
Cali, Colombia 1999
Moscow, Russia 1997
Bonn, Germany 1995
Leeds, Great Britain 1993
CITY 1ST A TE
Venue
C~7-
Has this event ever been held in Federal Way? no
Has this event ever been held in King County? no
Pierce County? no
If yes, when:
Month:
Year:
Venue:
City:
EVENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Is a host fee required? Yes
Committee
If so, what amount?
$2,500 paid by a grant from US Olympic
What is the projected number of tickets that will be sold?
3,000
Average ticket price:
$10
Event's total estimated expenses:
$85,000
Amount of expenses local host is responsible for?
All expenses
Events total estimated revenues?
$85,000
What portion of the event's proceeds will be kept by the local host?
All
VENUE INFORMATION
Proposed local venue:
Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatic Center
Location:
650 SW Campus Drive, Federal Way, WA 98023-8425
Proposed dates:
August 19-26
Have you confmned the availability of the proposed dates at the primary venue? yes
Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues? yes
c -&"
TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competition and practice sites)
$20,000
ECONOMIC IMPACT
How many athletes/participants will the event attract?
400+
How many team will the event attract?
40+ countries including Japan, Korea & China
(representation from six out of seven continents)
How far away will the (athlete/participants) travel?
International
How many spectators will the event attract?
750/day
How far away will spectators travel from?
International, national & regional
How many staff people will the event attract?
IOO/day out of a pool of 400
Of the numbers listed above, what percentage will require overnight lodging?
Athletes
Spectators
100%
40%
Event Staff
30%
I GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED:
$5,000
How will these grant funds be utilized? To promote the event; provide webcasting; possibly buy
television coverage; underwrite International Athletes and Officials Clinics; pay required transportation
and hospitality costs; pay facility rental and other necessary expenses; support local grassroot efforts to
develop sport in region.
t -4
VERY IMPORTANT: It is the intent of this grant program to enable an organization to produce
eveuts and activities they could not othenvise provide but not for the organization to profit from
the event. Therefore, the undersigned agrees to return the portion of the grant, when added to
other event revenues including other contributions, exceeds total event costs. This will enable the
amount returned to the grant fund for future distribution.
Please list the other sources offmancial support (sponsorship, etc.) which you have pursued:
Sports & Events Council of Seattle & King County
Ocean Engineering Sponsorship
Title Sponsorship
Other Sponsorships
Tacoma-Pierce County Sports Commission Grant
$6,000 committed
$5,000 committed
$20,000 seeking
seeking
$2,000 applying
The undersigned certifY the information provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based
on history of similar events and activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local
conditions.
Applicant's Signature ~ Æ~
, /~ lor
Applicant's Title:
Event Director
Date:
January 25,2001
C -(d
June 15,200]
To:
The Federal Way Lodging Tax Advisory Comminee
Greater Federal Way Chamber of Commerce
From:
L. Donald Kasper - President, Federal Way Community Council
Robert Kellogg Sr., - President, Friends of Federal Way
Re:
Celebration Park Banner Donation Program & Children's Playground Installation
Here is a brief outline of the Banner Donation Program proposed by 'The Federal Way Community Council
and Friends of Federal Way, an ad hoc volunteer organization.
The Purpose:
The banner donation program is designed to achieve three results; the addition of colorful, decorative
banners on the lighting poles that line the roadway through the park, generation of revenue to make the
installation of a children's playground possible and recognition of the donor companies as involved
supporters of the Federal Way community.
The Program:
Multi-colored custom designed banners donated by corporate sponsors will feature design elements
promoting aspects of Federal Way and Celebration Park. Each banner is fabricated ITom Sunbrella TM
And guaranteed colorfast and weather resistant for at least three years. Each corporate name will be affixed
in block lettering on the lower hem of the purchased banner. The cost for each banner, with the corporate
name on each side, is $3,000, invoiced at $1,000 annually for three years. An exception can occur if two
companies agree to share the cost of a banner at $1,500 each, invoiced annually at $500.
The Benefits:
The City of Federal Way benefits when revenues generated by the banner program at Celebration Park are
sufficient to complete the children's play area, a ITequent source of community criticism as it stands
currently. The cost for completion is estimated at $60,000. Prior to the passage of Initiative 695 it was
thought that nonnal tax revenues would make the funding of the children's play area possible in the out
years. The reality of revenue shortlà1ls in tax income makes it necessary to seek other solutions.
Additional benefits include the beautification of Celebration Park, enhancing the downtown revitali7.3tion
efforts of the community and the recognition given donors by users and visitors to the park as well as
residents of the larger community. .
Thc Celebration Park banner donation program is a win-win for everyone involved, a cost efTective way to
give recognition while enhancing our premier park facility and beautifYing the city that we call home.
~4L'*'\'-*!"-j,ðr"- ~e~
. ..
L Donald Kasper
President
¡-cderal Way l'HIJJ!JLulity l'uLUlcil
'7::(l-+ {~
^',:
Robert Kellogg Sr..
President
I-riends or Federal Way
,------
C -1/
, i
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
District
Director
P.O. Box 2350 Los Angeles, Calif. 90053
. FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC
P.O. BOX 3684
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
Person to Contact:
L BARRAGAN
Telephone Number:
(213) 894-233ó
Refer Reply to:
EO(0216)95
Date:
FEBRUARY 22, 1995
ErN: 91-0976982
Dear Taxpayer:
This letter is in response to your request for a copy of
the determination letter for the above named organization.
Our records indicate that this organization was recognized
to be exempt from Federal income tax in DECEMBER 1967 as
described in Internal Revenue Code section 501(c) (3). It is
further classified as an organization that is not a private
foundation as defined in section 509(a) of the code, because it
is an organization described in section 170(b) (1) (A) (vi).
in
The exempt status for the determination letter issued
DECEMBER 1967 continues to be in effect.
If you need further assistance, please contact our office
at the above address or telephone number.
Sincerely,
Dit~nt
C -/'2.----
FêderalWa y Çhalllber-Enha n cin:gColllÔ1 uliityProsperity
GRANT APPLICA nON
GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS: Read the entire packet, including the attached selection
criteria before completing this application. Please type or print. Answer each question to the best of your
ability. The BOARD does not provide funding for tournament entry fees, travel, lodging, meals,
uniforms, equipment, coaches salaries, facility upgrades or capital campaigns. If a question is not
applicable to your event, simply write "NI A" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver your
completed application to the address listed below.
APPLICANT'S NAME: L. Donald Kasper - Presidcnt 1 Robert Kellogg Sf. - President
ORGANIZATIONS: Federal Wav Community Council 1 Friends of Federal Way
STREET ADDRESS:292 17 58th Place South Auburn 98001/33419 33'd Place SW Fed. Way 98003
DAYTIME Telephone:(253) 941-6620 (Kasper) 1 (253) 957-7387 (Kellov;~)
Official Event Name: A Children's Plav!JTound IBiV; Tov) at Celebration Park.
Briefly describe the event (type of sport, male, female, cooed, etc): The plavground will serve 2 to 5 vear
old area residents and visitors to the weekend tournaments involving older siblin~s and parents. Both the
banners donated by local coroorations and organizations and the Children's playground will enhance our
local tourism efforts bv filling the need to beautifY our city center Dark and serve thc vacationing needs of
people visitin~ Federal Wav. The colorful banners also serve our community efforts to market our city as
a great place to visit live work and play. In essence. the banner Drogram and playground installation will
be an attractive backdrop for all the events takin~ place on the SDortS and ballfields in the park and send a
clear message that Federal Way is a growing community welcoming visitors and new business..
Scope of Evcnt (check I):
Local
Previous Hosts:
YEAR
CITY/STATE
Venue
~
lIas this event ever been hcld in Federal Way'? No
lias this event ever been held in King County'? No
Pierce County" No
EVfJ\T FINANCIAL INFORMATlO:\"
Is a host ICe required'? Yes
I f so. what amount'? $3 000
~~(3
FedendWay Chinn bel' ---EnhancingCOIllID unity. Prosperity
What is the projected number of Banners that will be sold? 22 to 35 at the most
Average ticket price: $ N/ A
Event's total estimated expenses: $60 000 to $80 000
Amount of expenses local host is responsible for? $ $60 000.
Events total estimated revenues?$ $60 000
What portion of the event's proceeds will be kept by the local host? All proceeds 1):0 to the City of Federal
Way to fund the cost of the Children's Plavground Banner fabrication and installation.
VENUE INFORMATION
Proposed local venue: Celebration Park
Location: The Children's Plavground will be installed adiacent to the soccer fields and South Concession
building
Proposed dates: Kompan Inc. has offered a complete installation at considerable discount and the Citv is
moving Quickly so installation can occur in Aul!Ust. 200 I instead of delaved until all banner procecds
have been received over a three year p~Tiod.
Have you contìrmed the availability of the proposed dates at the primary venue? YES
Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues? NO
TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competition and practice sites) $ N/A
ECONOMIC IMPACT
Bow many athletes/participants will the event attract? Annuallv. the park attracts an estimated ~50 000
peonle ineluding tournament participants for noth softnall and soccer Fourth of July Red White and Blue
event and daily \ is¡tors to walk ¡Og lunch ur just drive throu!!h the nark.
Ilo\\' many te"ms "ill the event aw'"cfl None -- ---.
c - r tf
/Ù;;Fe4eral}V~Y ÇbaIitbel"::-En.häncingCommunity Prosperity -
How far away will the (athlete/participants) travel (local, regional, national, international)? 350 miles. -
How many spectators will the event attract? We can only guestimate that the playground will attract
hundreds of children and their families each month.
How far away will spectators travel from? N/ A
How many staff people will the event attract? N/A
Of the numbers listed above, what percentage will require overnight lodging? Unknown
Athletes
N/A
%
Teams
N/A
%
Spectators
N/A
%
Event Staff
N/A
%
I GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED:
$5,000.
How will these grant funds be utilized? To build a dominant highlv visible children's plavground to serve
the needs of visitors and residents alike.
VERY IMPORTANT: Should you receive a grant and your event produces a profit, would you
agree to return a portion of the grant so that we may continue to provide funding for local events?
If so, what portion or percentage would you propose to return?
(Should this be a requirem£nt or be voluntary?) We do not expect to produce a profit
Please list the other sources of financial support (sponsorship, etc.) which you havc pursued:
Sources:
Capital One
WIO)'ç[lJaeug:[--L<lunda!Ü)nn -
Committed: YES ^mount: $3 000
___CornmiJ1",L YE). - ^mount: $3jIO(1
I'aeitiè Coast Ford______-
--__J-oll1mittcd: _--__YI:\____^Ill"1IIlL53_000
I'u\!et Sound Ener~y
Committed
YES
^mount: $1 OWl
C -(5
Federal WayChaDlber-FEllhancÎng C()nîmunityProsp~rity
Kiwanis Committed YES Amount: $3 000
Federal Way Svrnphony Committed YES Amount: $3 000
Omni Properties Committed YES Amount: $3.000
Multi-Service Center Committed YES Amount: $3 000
SeaTac Mall Committed YES Amount: $3 000
Kompan. Inc Committed YES Amount: $4450
Courtyard at the Marriott Committed YES Amount: $3.000
Holiday Inn Committed Verbal Amount: $3 000
Virginia Mason Clinic Committed YES Amount: $1.500
The undersigned certify the infonnation provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based
on history of similar events and activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local
conditions.
Applicant's Signature;Z§~~d'. ~~
Applicant's Signature l ~&. ~ F ~-
Date: June 15 2001 /'
Title: 71,.. 1::.5'-=--.1",...1
Title:~'9-:~t
F6FCA.:J
C -Ib
Page I ofl
From: Delores Shull
To: Barbara Reid
Date: 4/13/01 12:35:15 PM
Subject: Banner Program
Dear Barbara:
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, 1m catching up on several items today.
I wanted to let you know that the Chamber Board did not feel that the Chamber's budget allowed us to participate in the
Banner Program at this time. They felt that the program was very worthy and admirable, and would like to offer the
support of the Chamber for the program, but cannot commit dollars at this time.
We would be happy to feature information about it in our newsletter, or provide you with mailing labels, etc to reach the
business community with your message. Please let me know if these are ofimerest to you, and we can arrange that.
I personally wish you continued success with this project. You are to be commended for being such an active supporter
of community vitality in FW.
All the best,
Delores Shull
President/CEO
Federal Way Chamber
Our Vision: The Federal Way Chamber is at the center of business activity, developing partnerships for a vital
eommunity through political and community leadership
IIIC.IIL.I VVJl"OIl LIVlrllll,VILILLr""'U".IIVlr
C -11
The City of Federal Way
Celebration Park Banner Program
Sponsored banners
featuring your company name
for just pennies a day!
C-I?
City of Federal Way Logo
Celebration Park Banner Program
An Exclusive Opportunity!
The Federal Way business community now has an exclusive opportunity to donate colorful
banners for installation on the poles that line the road running through Celebration Park -
the city's cornerstone for the redevelopment and revitalization of its downtown core.
The 28.5 inch by 6 foot banners will feature the sponsor names in Avant Garde sans serif
letters at the top of each panel. Company name lettering will be 2 inches in height, legible
from a distance to everyone walking or driving through the park. Your banner will be in
place for a full 36 months!
Celebration Park is a major attraction for citizens of our community as we!! as regional
traffic due to very successful softball and soccer tournaments held each week-end from
April through October. Latest demographics indicate that Celebration Park was host to
roughly 90,000 people attending tournaments and special events. in 2000.
More special events, like the Red,White & Blue Fourth of July celebration which attracted
more than 15,000 people will be on the drawing boards for the future, persuading even
more people to come to our area.
Limited Availability!
. This is an opportunity, limited to a total of thirty-five donated banners at reasonable cost,
to put your company name in front of the public to show your corporate support of our
community.
The banners will feature five different designs, made of fabrics guaranteed to withstand
weathering and fading for at least three years.
-
Your Support For The Park Costs Just Pennies A Day!
For less than the cost of a daily early morning latte you can help put a Big Toy in the park.
Your banner is guaranteed. If at any time it needs replacing due to weathering, vandalism
or theft, it will be replaced immediately at no cost to you.
Be among the first to order your banner and guarantee you have a place in Celebration
Park. This is a limited opportunity. When the banners are gone, you won't have another
opportunity for three, long years!
c ---(1
"'@
CD""
¡'j:g
L~
Qcg:
~~
a~
g B'
¡d
~~
80.
-g¡
cõ"
~
g
§
t>
<8'
~
å
ï1
<3
<0
;t>
!II
1»
¡g ~
0
~
i'.I~*ft
~
"'"
~
'"
Q.
:::>
f
, , ,
i ", ", .
.. ¡ "
-..
... '<
CD
.1:1. , ,
'0
¡;
i .
¡"
~
~-~-[¡[ .", '",.",'
i
\ .
~ _!
~
<D
Q.
~
,1»
'<
<nO
~9L
:J~
B@
"00
}f:J
~~
- ""
<nIX>
§ g
Q" :J( )
9L~
C'"
C
Q"
()
'"
Q
[ß
0-
g
m ,
Q . -
(Q
(D
~g:¡¡¡
¡¡¡~
m"
;Oz
"""
[
aHU
H~i~ i
m~~s~ ~
$~"I ~
~~
C rJ-ìD
~
.
,
t
[
/
. Components:
Play Counter x 4
Sand Wheel
Sand Play With Scoop
Vertical Activity Rail
Hammock x 2
OK Slide, 55", 140 cm
Vertical Access Ladder, 31", 80 cm x 2
Climbing Net, Low Height
- With Sliding Handle
Rock Climber, Medium Width
Double Slide, 39", 100 cm
Play Shells x 2
Curved Slide, 55", 140 cm
Binoculars x 2
Sand Transporter
Sand Bowl
Megaphone
Sand Bowl With Spout
'\
(~
¡
1181
,~
~
~
Palace is centered around a courtyard
that is an ideal space for hide-and-seek and
offers many possibilities for climbing and
- swinging on the play shells and hammocks,
Each corner of the Palace has its own specialty:
one portal addresses sand ploy with counters
and curved panels, while across the yard on
accessible tower with a slide invites children
to slide and climb. Over the net, a low, likewise
accessible tower with a double slide offers a
more relaxed kind of sliding while the highest
tower challenges the oldest and most experienced
children with a vertical access ¡odder and a
curved modular slide,
0)
C-li
ð. A"""bl,Th"",d""'"""'bI,,o
01' ,.",,'". """""9 ""'w"h 'p",ol
"""", poo """
EXHIBIT B
Celebration Park Banner Program Contract
The Banner Program is a unique opportunity to donate to the City through anyone of five exciting designs
flying high in Celebration Park. Banners will fly for three (3) years, beginning on the date of installation.
A total of35 colorful banners are available to hang from light poles along the South 13'" Street extension
that runs through Celebration Park, continuing to the park exit at 9"' Street South.
Banners are fabricated from extended wear Sunbrella/Dikon, guaranteed color fast and mildew resistant for
3 years of continuous use. Lettering is Insignia cloth, and adhesive backed nylon, computer cut to
specifications. Each banner measures 24 inches wide by 6 feet in length.
In the event that the banners need to be replaced due to damage, theft or wear, it will be done at no
additional cost to you.
You can be a part of the Celebration Park Banner Program through a donation of only $3,000! You can
either pay in full at the time of purchase, or the City will invoice you annually for payments of$I,OOO per
year.
Five designs are available. Please check the design you prefer.
A: Frog B: Soccer C: Mt. Rainier D: Baseball
E: Eagle
FlfSt Choice:
A_-
B-
C-
D-
E-
Second Choice:
A- B-
C-
D'
E-
Please add the following donating company name to the banner(s):
21-character limitation:
Name
Title
Company Name
Address
City
State
Zip Code
Phone L--.J
Fax L--.J
By signing this agreement, I agree to timely pay the above sum for the banners and acknowledge that this is
an enforceable contract.
Approved: Accopted:
Signature
Signature
Title
Title
Payment Method:
Check enclosed
Please bill me
You may mail your payments to:
Cay of federal Way
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
Please keep one copy for yourself. A signed acceptance copy will be mailed to you.
C -;2d-
Citizens seel\: high-flying way to expand playground
'f Friends for
Federal Way hopes
to hang banners at
Celebration Park
By TAMMY BATEY
Assistant editar
A group of former Parks and Recreation
Conunission members believe briliianlIy
colored banners will add verve 10 Celebra-
tion Park while providing IIle means 10 ere-
ate'a larger, more traditional playground
Ihere,
Ex-commission memhers Dave Kaplan,
ßoh Kellogg Sr. and Barhara Reid, who
have formed Ihe gronp Friends nf Federal
Way, hope 10 convince hnsinesses and
commonHy gronps 10 chip in the $3,1K~)
apiece needed to hang a hanner io Ihe park
for three years,
Each hanner will display Ihe name of Ihe
donnr, np 10 21 characlers, in Zinch IYIX,"
KapJ¡Ul said, Five ,Iesigns of hanner will he
offered, 1\vo will fealure sporls Ihemes,
Iwo nalural hahilal graphics an,1 one a
genelic community design, -n,e first hnsi-
nesses and org¡Ulizalions 10 donale a han-
ner will get 10 choose Iheir design while
;;fEDERAl
-WAY
"MIRkOR
WEDNESDAY,jANUARY 24,200 I
olhers will nol. No one will gel to choose
where Ihe hanner is hung in Ihe park, Reid
said,
"We Ihink it might serve as a calalysllo
encourage other people 10 gussy up Iheir
relail areas," she said, "Ilhink it will be a
catalyst once people see Ihose banners lin-
ing Ihe slree!, 111ey'll knock yonr sncks
nff"
11", group hnpes the cily uses the pm-
ceeds 10 inslall playgronnd equipment Ihal
will kuock off Ihe socks of parenls who
have heen less Ihml salisfied willi Ihe exist-
ing equipmenl, which the cily paid $15,000
for and inslalled in Jannm'y, 2000,
"We've heard from people IIlat (the
equipment) while H's visually interesting,
ii's shari on variely," Kaplan said, '111e
commission always feli, Barhara and Bob
and I always feli, il w;'s nol our idea of a
playground, We want somelhing more,"
Cily officials have heard from some res-
idents who want more lradilional eqnil>
menllike slides and swings, -n,al indudes
Mary Paterson, who said she inilially mis-
Inol, the sleel eqnilmlenl for an art scnll>
lure, and Slephanie Collell, who calls H "a
tIlonslrosHy,"
Collett applauds the fluId ,,¡¡sing effort
to install more eqnipment, Ihough she still
SEE BANNERS, PA~E Al,
í")
N
\
(j
Witnt ¡l banner? ,
Banriers should start ßying from
Celebranon Hark IIgl1t fixtures a. .oon
~s the city h~s commlt!11en~ frorr¡IQ
buslo~ss oy;r~r! proiganl~\lç,h~" ,"'I
Each banner costs p,OÒO¡whlch Is '
., çyer ~-year I!f~ Þ~r 61 the'
br In ,The
,-"",na!11 Inch-taU,
tYpe (In the rs will, ,"
come lri five còlbh¡d'
de.ign¡,Twç will emp a.,ze athle~C$,
tWo \VIII ~l\1ph~S¡f' natuhl'~~~ i?M will
b.generlc, , ,,{' " d'
; For more InforlÍ1~!lon'~b9u\~çhat;!
log a banner or to becçme a n\èmbe,f -
of Friend. ' al\ gI'Q4P :
presl~~rt Q71-~ 106 '"
çr vice Dr ,I\el,4 at 9~1,:
1387,' r " "',',;
j'¡ ':,1 ill' 1,1 ""',
,," '
-\~Lo~-
'N t. \Io.J ~ -r ~ \., v.. V".L-
2./ 2.?/tJ)
It looks like a banner year for Celebration Park
FEDERAL WAY: Volunteer
group is selling colorful
pennants to raise funds
for children's play area
B, Bill Hulcheu,
T" N"" T"'",'
Fedeml IVay', Celehmlion Puck ,"ay b, a
little ,""",Io<ful th;, 'pring <illd "'0 ,"0"
run o',xt y""
11" F,d",1 Way C;ty Coun,;1 ""ntly ap.
pro,'edaproJe<ttoaddb3<mmtoCelebmt;oo r..
P",k', ,oad, "od ~
rund, ";,,d reo,"
boon" ,po",o"h;p
w;l1 b, u"d to ex.
pand th, ,h;[d"",
pi" ma,
rM,"" F,.d"al
IVa)' pa,k. ",nn,;,.
,;"'", B"h,m B,;,I
<a,"e 01' w;th th,
,d" " a w"' to
tOp' w;th p"k
rund;". ,ho"'Oex
"Th, pock juxt ;,
not ,o,"pl,": ,h,
sa;d, "They weco
abl""put m a ,mall
play ,,",a,but;!',not
th, play a"a ,ny;,
,;oned, And thm',
"r¡ I;lll,;n Ù" way
. Int..ested
;n sponso,;ng
a bann.. at
CelebeaUon
Pack?
Compan;es
and ;nd;v;duals
should contact
F,;ends oJ
Fed..al Way
memb..s
Bacbaca Reid
at 253-874-
3106 or Bob
Kellogg at 253-
952.2387,
ofd"o"tivo ,tuff,"
R,;djoin,d mth two fonn" purktOmmi,.
,ionm, Davo Kaplan and Bob Kellogg, to
fonn the Friend, of Fedecal IVay, 11" gcoup
i, now "l1ing th, b,nnm.
"W, want,d to ,toY involved un" we Ion
the ",","i"ion: "id Kellogg, p",ident of
the new Friend, group, "IV, felt the city n,ed.
,d a voluntm b'TOUp of "Ii,,", to ,"pport
au' puck. and oth" peoj'd' that i,"peovo
ooctOmmunity,"
Foe $3,000, buein"'" oe individual, tan
pu"huse a bonnet and havo th,i, tOmpany
" fan,;ly no,", printed on th,,". In all. 35
hannm wililin, the eoad thmu"h Cel,b".
tion Pack, odding",",", ,"Oth need,d colOE:
Reid "id,
Th, bannces ,hould he up thi, 'pring, and
play",aund "pan,ian ,hould follow m about
a yeac,
~
~
,
(j
K..",H~"""'I""'T..N""Tooo"
Jeff Enss, 11, left, sp;ns w;th his pal DaCEyl Zun;ga, 9, on a piece oJ playground equipment;n Celeb'ahon Pa,k. The F,iends of Fed..al
Way gmup;s mixing money to "pand ;ne pa'k's play area, '
R,;d hox sold '"' bonn", so fa" to Pa"fi,
Coool FOEd, SooT" Mall. Capital On', ;h,
South King Counly Mulh.ScMce C,nt" and
Oumi Pmpcrti", Buym can pay fOE th, b<ill'
nm ove' th,e, v"",,
Th, dty will 'open bannet pmdOttion to
bidding "~,,, and huy'" will hkely have ;c".
",I d"ign' to choo" fm,",
D"ign' will h. di'played on bulh ,ide; nf
the hannm, whi,h will he Ii f""t tall ""d
nbout 2'~ fe" wide,
R,id "id th, dty will be len with about
$89.000 aft" c",", Th, play uc" ,h, would
hk, to '" built indud" a s,"all ""I,.like
,trudU" w;th a ,lid" hridge, dubhau" and
"malladdm and whidigig', Design,d fOE
,hild"n ages 6 <illd youngee, th, i"'tallalion
would ""t about 860,000,
The Fri,nd, ",oup would u" the ","ain.
i,," ,"nneY to puethase nthee a,"eniti" fur
th, puck. R,id said.
"I'm thinking ,"ayhe ,o,"e t"es fOE po"i.
hly a minin,h",""",. ,nnw picnic tnbl",
things that w'ould dce" up the puck ond
,"ake it mar, ""ful." ,he "id.
Sh, met with dty ,taffm""b,,, <illd buei.
nm leadm fOE mo" than a y'"' b,fm
launching hee fund.,.ising ,ffort "di" this
month, Th, City Council approved th, project
on Jan, 16,
"Hundred, of people ride through Celeb".
tian Pack daily: ,he said. "And an additional
90,000 attended tournaments and special
events m 2000. The pia" is booked solid. I...
the banners us a win.mn.win ,ituatian,"
v Stnffwrire, Bill Hutch.., rovers the tOm.
muni"", of East Pi,"" County and South King
Coun!)' Reach him in Federni Way at 253.941.
9636 OE bill,hutch",.@mail.tribnettOm,
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
ITEM# :rz: (v)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITIEE REAPPOINTMENTS
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[8: CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
-'--'---------'-----'--------------'---'------'----'--.--.
--------
ATTACHMENTS: none
,-,-,----,-,-,-,---,---,-,-,--,----------'-'-'--"
-..---.-.-.-.-.---.----.-.-.----.---.-.--.----------------.-.------.-----
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The City Council has concurred in the reappointment of David DeGroot as a
committee member, and the reappointment of Joan Tabrum as an alternate, on the city's Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee, both for 2-year terms expiring on October 31, 2003.
---------------------------------
---------.----.----------------------------------
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a
-----------------------.--------------------..-------.----------------.
--------------------------------.-
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move the reappointment of committee member David DeGroot and alternate Joan Tabrum to
the city's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, both for 2-year terms expiring on October 31, 2003".
(The City Clerk will arrange for introduction and presentation of the reappointment certificates at the November 6,2001
regular meeting)
~_._------------
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05110/2001
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
ITEM# ~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
CATEGORY:
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
BUDGET IMPACT:
181 CONSENT
181 RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
ATTACHMENTS: City Council Resolution for adoption of the preliminary plat; staffmemo to City CounciV Land Use
Transportation Committee dated September 24, 200 I; Hearing Examiner Report and Recommendation dated September
18,2001; staff report to the Hearing Examiner dated August 9, 2001. (A notebook including all exhibits from the staff
report to the Hearing Examiner is located in the City Council office).
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Request for preliminary plat approval for a 22-1ot single-family subdivision on 6.32
acres pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20 (Subdivisions). The proposed preliminary plat of Tuscany
is located in the southern portion of the city east of 4th Avenue SW, as extended, at SW 353M Street, as extended.
,
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On October 1,2001, the Land Use! Transportation
Committee (L UTC) voted to forward a recommendation for approval for the proposed preliminary plat to the full Council,
with po changes to the Hearing Examiner's recommendation.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Preliminary Plat of Tuscany subject to Hearing Examiner
recommendations dated September 18, 2001."
-------
~
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D \DENIED
D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
D 'MOVED TO SECOND READING (ord/nonce,only)
COUNCIL BILL #
I ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/1 0/2001
DRAFT
ID/9/ð I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASIDNGTON,
APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TUSCANY, FEDERAL
WAY FILE NO. 00-104313-00-SU.
WHEREAS, the applicant Brooks Powell of Powell Home Builders, applied to
the City of Federal Way for preliminary plat approval to subdivide certain real property known
as Tuscany and consisting of 6.32 acres into twenty-two (22) single family residential lots
located east of 4th Avenue SW as extended, at SW 353rd Street as extended; and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2001, a Mitigated Environmental Determination of
Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of
Community Development Services pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW
43.2IC, and no one appealed the MDNS; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner held a public hearing
on September 4,2001 concerning the preliminary plat of Tuscany; and
WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing, on September 18, 2001, the
Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner issued a written Report and Recommendation
containing findings, and conclusions and recommending approval of the preliminary plat of
Tuscany subject to conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, on October I, 2001 the City Council Land Use and Transportation
Committee considered the record and the Hearing Examiner recommendation and voted to
Doc. I.D. #16577
forward a recommendation for approval of the proposed preliminary plat of Tuscany to the full
City Council, with no changes to the hearing Examiner recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has jurisdiction and authority pursuant
to Section 20-127 of the Federal Way City Code to approve, deny or modify a preliminary plat
and/or its conditions; and
WHEREAS, on October 16, 2001, the City Council considered the written record
and the Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City
Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City Codes;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Adoption of Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
1.
The findings of fact and conclusions of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's
Recommendation, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, are hereby
adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Federal Way City Council. Any finding deemed
to be a conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding shall be treated as such.
2.
Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report and Hearing
Examiner's recommendation, and conditions of approval as established therein, the proposed
subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and
for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops,
potable water supplies, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, play grounds, and schools and
school grounds, and all other relevant facts as are required by City Code and State law, and
provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students
who walk to and iTom school.
Doc.I.D. #16577
3.
The public use and interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval
granted herein.
Section 2. ADl)lication Approval. Based upon the recommendation of the Federal Way
Land Use Hearing Examiner and findings and conclusions contained therein as adopted by the
City Council immediately above, the preliminary plat of Tuscany, Federal Way File No. 00-
104313-00-SU, is hereby approved, subject to conditions as contained in the Recommendation of
the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner dated September 18, 2001 (Exhibit A).
Section 3.
Conditions of Approval Integral.
The conditions of approval of the
preliminary plat are all integral to each other with respect to the City Council finding that the
public use and interest will be served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property.
Should any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter declare any of the conditions
invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval granted in this resolution shall
be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the City of Federal Way Hearing
Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or conditions and conduct
such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes appropriate
provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare and other factors as required by RCW
Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules and regulations, and forward such
recommendation to the City Council for further action.
Section 4. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution.
Doc. I.D. #16577
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon
passage by the Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, nnS_DAYOF
,2001.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, MIKE PARK
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
Doc. I.D. #16577
DATE:
To:
FROM:
VIA:
HE:
I.
II.
III.
IV.
MEMORANDUM
September 24, 2001
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development servi~c......--
David M~anager
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
Federal Way File No: 00-104313-00-SU
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Land Use and Transportation Committee forward to the City
Council a recommendation approving Preliminary Plat of Tuscany with conditions
based on the findings and conclusions in the September 18, 2001 Hearing Examiner
Report.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
The applicant requests preliminary plat approval of a twenty-two (22) lot single family
residential subdivision on a 6.32 acre parcel as provided for under Federal Way City
Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, Subdivisions, subject to City Council approval.
REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-127(a) , the City Council issues a final decision at a
public meeting after review of the Hearing Examiners recommendation. Consistent
with how land use matters are currently processed by the City, preliminary plat
applications are brought to City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee for
review and recommendation prior to review by the full Council.
HEARING EXAMINERS RECOMMENDATION
On September 18, 2001, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner issued a recommendation
(attached) to approve the proposed preliminary plat subject to the following conditions:
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany Subdivision,
LUTC Memorandum
Page 2
1. The applicant shall obtain the services of a qualified geotechnical engineer to review
engineering design and specifications; be present on site during al11and surface
modification activities, including excavation of infiltration pond to ensure the pond
bottom is established into soils which can support infiltration rates; verify
subsurface conditions; inspect and conduct compaction tests for the roads, building
lots, infIltration pond and retaining walls; ensure implementation of the
recommendations in the geotechnical reports; and provide the city with any
additional geotechnical recommendations for plat construction and future homes on
the site, including revegetation of disturbed areas and lot drainage adjacent to the
steep slope; subject to determination by the Directors of Community Development
Services and Public Works. In addition, prior to final plat approval, the infiltration
system shall be required to be operational and approved by the Public Works staff.
This shall include infiltration tests conducted by the applicant and visual inspections
to demonstrate that the design infiltration rate is being achieved and the system is
functioning properly.
2. Prior to final plat recording, the preliminary plat map shall be revised as follows:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Notation that all driveways must be set back a minimum distance of 25'
from adjacent intersections;
Language reflecting conditions number 2,3,4 and 5 from the October
17, 2000 shared storm drainage facility variance.
Language dedicating all public rights-of-way to the City of Federal Way;
Language establishing responsibility for maintenance of cul-de-sac
landscaping with Homeowners;
Language establishing responsibility of the applicant for the removal of
the temporary cul-de-sac on 4th Avenue SW in conjunction with roadway
improvements;
Half street improvements to the east side of 4'" Ave SW from SW 353m
Street to SW 356'" Street, including full curb, gutter, street trees, planter
strip, sidewalk, and street lighting;
Steep slope areas and associated 25 foot setbacks on proposed lots 21 and
22 established in Native Growth Protections Easements (NGPE) with
language stating that
"NGPE conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land witlún
the easement, that the interest includes the preservation of native
vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and
welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of
slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE
(f)
(g)
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany Subdivision,
LUTC Memorandum
Page 3
(h)
(i)
imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of land
subject to the easement the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the
public by the City of Federal Way, to leave undisturbed all trees and
other vegetation within the easement. The vegetation within the
easement may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged
without express permission from the City of Federal Way, which
permission must be obtained in writing from the Director of
Community Development Services. "
Installation of a fence located 25 feet from the top of the steep slope
areas associated with lots 21 and 22 to be installed prior to final plat
recording, and to be owned and maintained in perpetuity by the
homeowners association; and
Any geotechnical restrictions and conditions for future building
development, pursuant to Condition #1, above.
3. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final landscape plan, prepared by a
licensed landscape architect, shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Director of Community Development Services, and shall include the following
elements:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(e)
If constructed with the Tuscany project, visual screening of all property
boundaries of the infiltration tract (and fencing if applicable) from
adjacent properties and the 3" Place SW right-of-way;
Street trees on the project side of 4th Avenue SW, and both sides of 3"
Place SW internal plat street;
Vegetative screening of retaining walls on the Cottages West site;
Cul-de-sac landscaping;
Revegetation of disturbed slope areas (as recommended by the
geotechnical engineer pursuant to Condition #1, above); and
Significant tree identification and replacement.
4. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit elevations and
design descriptions of fences, where visible from rights-of-way or pedestrian areas,
showing that these utilize natural materials and colors; and that fencing of the
infiltration pond (if required by the KCSWDM) is vinyl coated in a dark color and
screened by landscaping (pursuant to an approved landscape plan); for review and
approval by the Directors of Community Development Services and Public Works.
5. Prior to final plat recording, the applicant shall pay the alternative fee-in-lieu of
providing on site open space, as proposed and accepted, which fee shall be
calculated on the basis of 15 percent of the most recent assessed valuation or MAl
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany Subdivision,
LUTC Memorandum
Page 4
appraisal, at that time, subject to approval by the Directors of Parks and
Community Development Services.
6. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit elevations and
design descriptions of retaining walls and rockeries for review and approval by the
Directors of Community Development and Public Works; showing that these are
located outside of the right-of-way, that these are harmonious with existing
adjoining residential uses and promote residential design themes through such
means as terracing, orientation, natural material selection, use of vegetation, and
textural treatment.
V.
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
October 21,2000
Notice of Application issued.
June 23, 2oo1
Mitigated Environmental Determination issued.
August 18, 2001
Notice of Public Hearing issued.
September 4, 2001
Hearing Examiner public hearing.
September 18, 2oo1 Hearing Examiner recommendation issued.
October 1, 2001
City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting.
October 16, 2001
City Council meeting.
VI.
DECISIONAL CRITERIA
Except as specifically noted in FWCC section 20127, the scope of the City Council
review is limited to the record of the Hearing Examiner public hearing; oral comments
received at the public meeting (provided these do not raise new issues or information
not contained in the Examiner's record); and the examiners report. These materials
shall be reviewed for compliance with decisional criteria set forth in FWCC section 20-
126(c), as noted below:
1.
It is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan;
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany Subdivision,
LUTC Memorandum
Page 5
2.
3.
4.
5.
It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Chapter 20 of the Federal
Way City Code, including those adopted by reference from the Comprehensive
Plan; and
It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
It is consistent with design criteria listed in FWCC Section 20-2
It is consistent with the development standards listed in FWCC section 20-
151through 20-157 and FWCC Section 20-178 through 20-187.
Findings on how the application is consistent with these decisional criteria are contained
on pages 2 through 8 of the Hearing Examiners recommendation.
VII.
COUNCIL ACTION
After consideration of the record, the City Council may, by action approved by a
majority of the total membership, take one of the following actions, pursuant to FWCC
Sec. 20-127(c):
1.
Adopt the recommendation and approve the Preliminary Plat;
2.
Reject the recommendation and deny the Preliminary Plat;
3.
Remand the Preliminary Plat back to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to FWCC
section 20-127(b); or
4.
Adopt its own recommendations and
a. Approve the preliminary plat
b. Disprove the preliminary plat; or
c. Require or approve a minor modification to the preliminary plat pursuant to
FWCC section 20-127(d).
Remand the preliminary plat back to the Hearing Examiner.
A draft resolution recommending approval of the proposed application as recommended
by the Hearing Examiner is included.
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany Subdivision,
LUTC Memorandum
Page 6
Attachments:
Hearing Examiner Recommendation dated September 28, 2oo!
Staff Report to Hearing Examiner **
Draft Resolution
** NOTE:
The .staff report" will include the report, the Environmental Decision, and a reduced scale pint
map. Afull copy of the Staff Report to the Hearing Exmniner will be in a notebook in the City
Council Room.
(
Q.
n:I
~
~
'2
"0
:>
~
------------------
r::
n:I
D:
QJ
, ..I
Vi
QJ
n:I
U
U)
"'C
QJ
U
j
"'C
QJ
c::
(206) 661-4OX}
FEDcRALWAY,WA 98003-6210
September 18,2001
Brooks Powell
Powell Home Builders
P.O. Box 98309
Des Moines. WA 98198
RE:
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TUSCANY
Dear Applicant:
Enclosed please find the Report and Recommendation relating to the above-entitled case.
:::,y ~. YOOffi. æ.. C (J
HEA~~~~R
SKC/ca
cc:
All parties of record
City of Federal Way
(J ~~~
r ~~--J
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page-l
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
IN THE MATTER OF:
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TUSCANY
)
)
)
)
)
)
FWHE# 01-07
I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of a 22 lot single family
residential subdivision as provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20,
"Subdivisions", and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, Division 6.
II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
Hearing Date:
Decision Date:
September 4, 2001
September 18,2001
At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence:
1.
Deb Barker, City of Federal Way
2.
Jim Femling, City of Federal Way Public Works Department
3.
Jeff Dye, Civil Engineer, 145 SW 155'" St., Suite 102, Seattle, WA 98166
At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these
proceedings:
1.
Staff Report with all attachments
2.
Presentation/slides from Deb Barker
III. FINDINGS
1.
The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into
Page - 2
2.
4.
the record, and taken this matter under advisement.
The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable
policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit "1" and
incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
3.
All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the
Federal Way City Code (FWCC).
The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in a generally rectangular, 6.32
acre parcel of unimproved property located north of SW 356th St. at the terminus of
4th Ave. SW and west of 1<' Avenue South within the southern portion of the City of
Federal Way. The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to allow subdivision
of the site into 22 single family residential lots. The parcel to the east of the site will
consist of the Village Green Cottages West retirement community, and the two
projects will share a common storm drainage system located in the northcentral and
northeast portions of the sites.
5.
The preliminary plat map shows that the applicant will extend 4th Ave. SW to the
north where it will intersect with SW 353'd St. which the applicant will extend east
from the Bellacañno Woods subdivision. The two streets will intersect near the
center of the parcel's west property line and an internal plat road will extend east
and north from said intersection and terminate in a cul-de-sac. All lots will access
onto either the newly constructed internal plat road or the extension of 4th Ave. SW.
Lot sizes vary between 9,600 square feet and 13,660 square feet.
6.
The site is located within the Residential Single Family (RS-9.6) zone classification
of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). The RS-9.6 classification authorizes
detached single family residential homes on minimum 9,600 square foot lots.
Parcels abutting the south, east, and west property lines are also located within the
RS-9.6 zone classification and as previously found, the parcel to the east is the
location of the proposed Cottages West senior housing facility. Parcels to the west
and south are improved with single family residential dwellings. The parcel to the
north is located within the Multi Family (RM-2,400) zone classification and improved
with an apartment complex.
7.
As previously found, the retirement community and the preliminary plat will use the
same storm drainage system as both sites drain into a manmade, closed
depression located on the Cottages West property. On October 17,2000, the City
waived the requirement for separate drainage facilities and approved construction
Page - 3
8.
of one facility to serve both projects. The drainage system will also accommodate
overflow discharge from the Bellacarino Woods subdivision to the west. All storm
drainage improvements must comply with all applicable core and special
requirements set forth in the King County Stormwater Design Manual. The storm
drainage system proposes discharging water to a closed depression which was
once used as a sand and gravel quarry. Historically the low area continued onto an
adjacent northern property and into a forested ravine, but in the late 1980's under
King County, the property was developed into an apartment complex and the
existing low area was regraded and filled. The drainage facility will provide water
quality treatment and retention for both the Tuscany plat and the Cottages West site
and will also accommodate drainage overflow from Bellacarino Woods. If for any
reason Cottages West does not construct the storm drainage facility, the ápplicant
must do so.
The site has rolling topography with a general slope from west to east towards the
Cottages West site. Average slopes equal 10% to 20% with a 40% gradient located
on proposed lots 21 and 22 at the south end ofthe parcel. Steep slopes exist also
adjacent to lots 11 and 12. The applicant's geotechnical report states that the
slopes were artificially created by a former gravel mining operation, and that the
slopes approach 16 feet in height with an approximate 85% gradient. The applicant
and City staff reached agreement regarding fencing and setbacks for the steep
slopes on lots 21 and 22 and such agreement is incorporated into conditions of
approval hereinafter. The applicant will place all areas meeting the definition of
steep slope within a native growth protection easement. Implementation of the
recommendations set forth in the applicant's geotechnical report and compliance
with conditions of approval will minimize the topographic and vegetation impacts
and ensure slope and soil stability.
9.
The unimproved site primarily supports mature fir, alder, Madrona, and big leaf
maple trees with a native understory. The applicant's significant tree inventory
identifies 271 trees that meet the FWCC definition of "significant". The applicant
has meandered the road around significant trees as much as possible, but the road
location is mostly predetermined by the previously installed sewer trunk line. The
applicant will install trees within rights-of-way and will comply with Section 22-1568
FWCC, the significant tree ordinance.
10.
The applicant will not provide open space in accordance with Section 20-155(b)
FWCC which requires the set aside of 15% of the gross land area of the
subdivision. The applicant will instead pay a fee in lieu of open space which has
been agreed to by the City parks director. The applicant shall pay a fee based upon
Page - 4
11.
12.
13.
15% of the gross area or 41 ,345 square feet in accordance with the assessed value
of the land.
While development of the site will change a 6.32 acre forested area into a 22 lot
single family residential development and will thus eliminate wildlife habitat, the site
contains no federally or State listed threatened or otherwise protected animal
species. Furthermore, the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Priority Habitats and
Species Map does not indicate the presence of such species. The applicant's
wildlife habitat study confirms City, State, and Federal assessments, however, the
site is within the vicinity of the Hylebos Wetland State Park which contains
significant habitats and habitat connectivity and circuitry within the vicinity is high
due to an off-site stream corridor. The study recommends retention of la'rge trees
when possible, prevention of sediment from leaving the site during construction, and
maintaining a corridor of vegetation in the bottom of the off-site drainage facility. The
City has required compliance with these recommendations in the conditions of
approval.
As previously found, the steep slopes located on lots 21 and 22 and adjacent to lots
11 and 12 meet the definition of sensitive areas. While these slopes were artificially
created, the geotechnical report recommends special conditions regarding grading,
filling, retaining walls, and erosion control. The report recommends setbacks often
feet on lots 11 and 12, and 25 feet from the top of the slope on lots 21 and 22. The
City has added a condition requiring compliance with the geotechnical report
recommendations. Compliance with such recommendations will minimize
topographic impacts and will ensure slope stability.
As previously found, the applicant wíll provide access into the subdivision via an
extension of 4'" Ave. SW to SW 353rd St. and the construction of an internal plat
road known as 3m Place SW. Improvements on 3rd Place SW will include 28 feet of
pavement, vertical curb, gutter, landscape strip, street trees, sidewalk, and utility
strip within a 52 foot wide right-of-way. The applicant will construct half street
improvements on the eastem half of 4'" Ave. SW from SW 353rd St. to SW 356'" SI.
which will consist of 20 feet of pavement, vertical curb and gutters, landscape strip,
street trees, sidewalks, and a utility strip within the existing 32 fool wide right-of-
way. The applicant will also construct sidewalks along all 101 frontages and along the
east side of 4'" Ave. SW to SW 356'" 81. All lots whl abut the newly constructed road
or the improved 4" Ave. SW and will take access therefrom. The applicant must also
pay ils proportionate share of $50,300 for traffic improvements on SW 356'" St.
between 1" Ave. S. and SR-99 which involves widening the road to five lanes.
Page - 5
14.
15.
16.
Enterprise Elementary School, IIlahee Junior High School, and Federal Way High
School will serve the proposed subdivision. Elementary students will walk to school
through the Bellacarino Woods subdivision, and junior high school students will walk
to lIIahee Junior High School less than one mile away. The school district will
provide bus transportation for high school students from a school bus stop located
at the intersection on'" Ave. SW and SW 354'" St. The applicant will provide safe
walking conditions for students by installing a sidewalk along 4'" Ave. SW to SW
356'" St. The applicant will also pay school impact fees in the amount of $2,710 per
single family housing unit.
The Lakehaven Utility District has provided a certifica~e of water availability
indicating the district's ability to provide both domestic water and fire flow to the site
through a developor extension agreement. The Lakehaven Utility District has also
indicated its ability to provide sanitaIY sewer service to each lot.
Prior to recommending approval to the Federal Way City Council, the Examiner
must find that the proposed preliminary plat satisfies the criteria set forth in Section
20-126(c) FWCC. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows:
A.
The project is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan which
designates the property as Single family - High Density. The applicant
proposes a single family residential subdivision with minimum lot sizes of
9,600 square feet and a density of 3.48 dwelling units per acre.
B.
The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the FWCC including
those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan. The project must
comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 18, Environmental Policy;
Chapter 20. Subdivisions; and Chapter 22, Zoning. As conditioned
hereinafter the preliminary plat will comply with all provisions of the FWGC.
c.
The proposed plat is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare if
developed in accordance with conditions of approval and applicable codes
and regulations.
D.
The project complies with the design criteria set forth in FWCC Section 20-2.
The project represents an effective use of land, the promotion of safe and
convenient travel on streets. the provision of housing for of the community.
and protection of environmentally sensitive areas.
Page - 6
E.
The project complies with the development standards listed in FWCC
Sections 20-151 through 157, and 20-78 through 20-187.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions:
1.
The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented
by this request.
2.
The proposed preliminary plat of Tuscany satisfies all criteria set forth in the FWCC
and all policies of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The proposed preliminary
plat will serve the public use and interest by providing an attractive location for a
single family residential subdivision, and therefore should be approved subject to
the following conditions:
1.
The applicant shall obtain the services of a qualified geotechnical engineer
to review engineering design and specifications; be present on site during all
lands surface modification activities, including excavation of infiltration pond
to ensure the pond bottom is established into soils which can support
infiltration rates; verify subsurface conditions; inspect and conduct
compaction tests for the road, building lots, infiltration pond, and retaining
walls; ensure implementation of the recommendations for plat construction
and future homes on the site, including re-vegetation of disturbed areas and
lot drainage adjacent to the steep slope, subject to determination by the
Directors of Community Development Services and Public Works. In
addition, prior to final plat approval, the infiltration system shall be required
to be operational and approved by the Public Works staff. This shall include
infiltration tests conducted by the applicant and visual inspections to
demonstrate that the design infiltration rate is being achieved and the system
is functioning properly.
2.
Prior to final plat recording, the preliminary plat map shall be revised as
follows:
A
Notation that all driveways must be set back a minimum distarlce of
25 feet from adjacent intersections.
B.
Language reflecting Conditions 2, 3, 4, and 5 from the October 17,
2000, shared storm drainage facility variance.
Page - 7
C.
D.
E.
Language dedicating all public rights-of-way to the City of Federal
Way.
Language establishing responsibility for maintenance of cul-de-sac
landscaping with homeowners.
Language establishing responsibility of the applicant for the removal
of the temporary cul-de-sac on 4"' Avenue SW in conjunction with
roadway improvements.
F.
Half street improvements to the east side of 4th Avenue SW from 353"'
Street to SW 35601 Street, including full curb, gutter, street trees,
planter strip, sidewalk, and street lighting.
G.
Steep slope areas and associated 25 foot setbacks on proposed lots
21 and 22 established in a NGPE with language stating that:
"NGPE conveys to the public a beneficial interest in
the land within the easement, that the interest
includes the preservation of native vegetation for all
purposes that benefit the public health, safety, and
welfare, including control of surface water and
erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection
and plant and animal habitat. The NGPE imposes
upon all present and future owners and occupiers of
land subject to the easement the obligation,
enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of
Federal Way, to leave undisturbed all trees and other
vegetation within the easement. The vegetation
within the easement may not be cut, pruned, covered
by fill, removed, or damaged without express
pennission from the City of Federal Way, which
pennission must be obtained in writing from the
Director of Community Development Services"
H.
Installation of a fence located 25 feet from the top of the steep slope
areas associated with Lots 21 and 22 to be installed prior to final plat
recording, and to be owned and maintained in perpetuity by the
homeowners association.
Page - 8
3.
I.
Any geotechnical restrictions and conditions for future building
development, pursuant to Condition #1, above.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final landscape plan prepared
by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Director of Community Development Services, and shall
include the following elements:
A.
If constructed with the Tuscany project, visual screening of all
property boundaries of the infiltration tract (and fencing if
applicable) from adjacent properties and the ,3'0 Place SW fight-of-
way.
B.
Street trees on the project side of 4th Avenue SW, and both sides of
3" Place SW internal plat street
C.
Vegetative screening of retaining walls on the Cottages West site.
D.
Cul-de-sac landscaping.
E.
Re-vegetation of disturbed slope areas (as recommended by the
geotechnical engineer pursuant to Condition #1, above).
F.
Significant tree identification and replacement
4.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit
elevations and design descriptions of fences, where visible from rights-of-
way or pedestrian areas, showing that theses utilize natural materials and
colors and that fencing of the infiltration pond (if required by the
KCSWDM) is vinyl coated in a dark color and screened by landscaping
(pursuant to an approved landscape plan); for review and approval by the
Directors of Community Development Services and Public Works.
5.
Prior to final plat recording, the applicant shall pay the alternative fee-in-
lieu of providing on site open space, as proposed and accepted, which fee
shall be calculated on the basis of 15 percent of the most assessed
valuation or MAl appraisal at that time, subject to approval by the
Directors of Parks and Community Development Services.
Page - 9
6.
Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit
elevations and design descriptions of retaining walls and rockeries for
review and approval by the Directors of Community Development and
Public Works; showing that these are located outside of the right-of-way,
that these are harmonious with existing adjoining residential uses and
promote residential design themes through such means as terracing,
orientation, natural material selection, use of vegetation, and textural
treatment.
RECOMMENDA TJON:
It is hereby recommended to the Federal Way City Council.that the preliminary plat
of Tuscany be approved subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions
above.
DATED THIS
I Rf2. DAY OF September, 200
TRANSMITTED THIS ~ DAY OF September, 2001, to the following:
APPLICANT:
Brooks Powell
Powell Home Builders
P.O. Box 98309
Des Moines, WA 98198
ENGINEER:
Duncanson Company Inc.
Jeffrey Dye, Project Manager
145 SW 155'" St., Suite 102
Seattle, WA 98166
OWNERS:
John Ankenbrandt
15120 Anchorage Way
Ft. Meyers, FL 33908
Page - 10
Bob and Susan Rinaldi
6346 38th Avenue SW
Seattle, WA 98126
City of Federal Way
clo Chris Green
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
CllY COUNCIL REVIEW, ACTION
Pursuant to Section 20-127, following receipt of the final report and recommendation of
the hearing examiner, a date shall be set for a public meeting before the city council.
The city council review of the preliminary plat application shall be limited to the record of
the hearing before the hearing examiner, oral comments received during the public
meeting (so long .as those comments do not raise new issues or information not
contained in the examiner's record) and the hearing examiner's written report. These
materials shall be reviewed for compliance with decisional criteria set forth in section 20-
126- The city council may receive new evidence or information not contained in the
record of hearing before the hearing examiner, but only if that evidence or information: (i)
relates to the validity of the hearing examiner's decision at the time it was made and the
party offering the new evidence did not know and was under no duty to discover or could
not reasonably have discovered the evidence until after the hearing examiner's decision;
or (ii) the hearing examiner improperly excluded or omitted the evidence from the record.
If the city council concludes, based on a challenge to the hearing examiner
recommendation or its own review of the recommendation, that the record compiled by
the hearing examiner is incomplete or not adequate to allow the city council to make a
decision on the application, the city council may by motion remand the matter to the
hearing examiner with the direction to reopen the hearing and provide supplementary
findings and/or conclusions on the matter or matters specified in the motion.
After considering the recommendation of the hearing examiner, the city council may
adopt or reject the hearing examiner's recommendations based on the record
established at the public hearing. If, after considering the matter at a public meeting, the
city council deems a change in the hearing examiner's recommendation approving or
disapproving the preliminary plat is necessary, the city council shall adopt its own
recommendations and approve or disapprove the preliminary plat.
As part of the final review, the city council may require or approve a minor modification
to the preliminary plat if:
(c)
(d)
The change will not have the effect of increasing the residential density of the
plat;
The change will not result in the relocation of any access point to an exterior
street from the plat;
The change will not result in any loss of open space or buffering provided in the
plat; and
The city determines that the change will not increase any adverse impacts or
undesirable effects of the project and that the change does not significantly alter
the project.
(a)
(b)
(Ç;rF" r
(g(Q)(£;í\ ."
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT TO THE
FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TUSCANY
Federal Way File No. 00-104313-00-SU
PuBLIC HEARING - September 4, 2001
Federal Way City Hall City Council Chambers
33530 First Way South
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION.............................................................................................................1
II. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES.............................................................................2
III. STATE ENvIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.......................................................................................3
IV. NATURAL ENvIRONMENT..................................................... ...................................... ...............3
V. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS...................... ... .... ... .................. 7
VI. GENERAL DESIGN................................................... ....................................................................7
VII. TRANSPORTATION......................................................... .............................................................8
VIII. PUBLIC SERVICES................................ ... ......... ..........--....----. ------.--.----8
Ix. UTILITIES................................................................................................................... ............10
X. ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA................................................--...................................... I I
Xl FrNDJNGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION....................--............................................-- .--............12
XII. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. ................... ...............15
XIII. LIST OF EXHIBITS............................. ................................. --17
Report Prepared by
Deb Barker, Associate Planner
August 9, 2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 4,2001
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TUSCANY
FileNo:
00-104313-00-SU
Applicant:
Brooks Powell
Powell Home Builders
PO Box 98309
Des Moines, WA 98198
Phone: 206-824-6224
Engineer:
Duncanson Company Inc.
Jeffrey Dye, Project Manager
145 SW 155th Street, Suite 102
Seattle, WA 98166
Phone: 206-244-4141
Owners:
John Ankenbrandt
15120 Anchorage Way
Ft. Meyers, FL 33908
Bob and Susan Rinaldi
6346 38th Avenue SW
Seattle, W A 98126
Action
Requested:
Preliminmy plat approval of a 22 lot single-family residential subdivision as
provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions,"
and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, Division 6.
Staff
Representative:
Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-661-4103
Staff
Recommendation:
Preliminmy Plat Approval with Conditions as Recommended
I
GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Description of the Proposal- The applicant proposes to subdivide a vacant 6.32-acre lot into 22
residential single-family lots, each having a minimum of 9,600 square feet (Exhibit A). There is
one tract established for stann drainage conveyance.
B. Location - The property is located east of 4th Avenue SW as extended, at SW 353'" Street as
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany'
StalTReoort to the ITeario. Examiner
OO-I04313-00-SU
Page 1
n
extended, north of SW 356th Street (Exhibit B).
c.
Legal Description - See Exhibit C.
D.
Size of Property - The subject site has a land area of 275,430 square feet (6.32 acres).
E. Land Use and Zoning -
Direction Zoning Comprehensive Plan Existing Land Use
Site RS-9.61 SF - High Density Vacant
North RM2400 Multifamily Apartment complex
South RS-9.6 SF - High Density SFR'
East RS-9.6 SF - High Density vacant
West RS-9.6 SF - High Density SFR3
F.
Background - The preliminary plat of Tuscany was submitted on August 14,2000, as a 22-lot
subdivision. The application was determined complete on October 17,2000. A Boundary Line
Adjustment (BLA) reconfiguring the three existing tax parcels into two was submitted on July 25,
2000, and is under review under project file number 00-104014-00-Su.
CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application.
A.
Community Development Review Committee (CDRC), consisting of the Federal Way Community
Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works Engineering and Traffic
Divisions; Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department; Federal Way Department of
Public Safety (Police); Federal Way Fire Department; Lakehaven Utility District; and Federal Way
Public Schools. CDRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable.
B.
All property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed notices of the complete application and
of the September 4, 2001, public hearing. The site was also posted and notice published in the
newspaper and on the City's official notice boards.
c.
In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and FWCC Chapter 18,
"Environmental Protection," all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and all
affected agencies, were notified of the proposed action and the City's environmental decision. In
addition, the site was posted and notice placed in the newspaper and on the City's official notice
boards. No comments were received, and no changes or corrections were made to the City's initial
detennination.
ill STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
'RS-9.6 ~ single-family residential, 9,600 square foot minimum lot size.
'SFR ~ single-family residential
3 Proposed location of the Cottages West Senior housing facility.
OO-104313-O0-SU
Page 2
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
StafTReport to the Hearing Examiner
A.
A Mitigated Environmental Determination of Non significance (MDNS) was issued for the
proposed action on June 23, 2001 (Exhibit D). This detennination was based on review of
information in the project file, including the environmental checklist (Exhibit E), resulting in the
conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the
environment, provided the following measures are met:
1.
As required by the Public Works Director, the applicant shall either construct the Traffic
Improvement Program (TIP) projects at South 356th Streetll" Avenue South - SR 99
($7,205,000), prior to final plat approval, or, as may be allowed by the Public Works
Director, voluntarily pay $50,300.00 toward construction of this TIP project prior to the
final plat approval.
If, for any reason, the storm drainage facility required for this plat is not constructed and
operational under the Cottages West plat, the applicant shall construct the approved off-
site storm drainage facility in conjunction with Tuscany prelimina¡y plat construction.
The storm drainage facility shall be constructed by the applicant per approved plans,
inspected, and approved by the City before fmal plat approval can be granted.
2.
B.
No comment letters were received during the 14-day SEPA comment period. No appeals were
filed.
IV NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
A.
Stormwater Runoff - A Prelimina¡y Technical Information report (TIR) was prepared for the site
by Duncanson Company, Inc. (Exhibit F), and reviewed by the Public Works Department. The
report identified the drainage basin for both the Tuscany site and the adjacent Cottages West site
as a man-made closed depression, located off site of the Tuscany property on the Cottages West
property' The 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) deifies a closed
depression as an area which is low-lying and either has no surface water outlet, or has limited
outlet that during storm events the area acts as a retention basin, with no more than 5,000 square
feet of water surface area at overflow elevation.
In October 17, 2000, the City waived the requirement for separate drainage facilities (Exhibit G),
and approved construction of one facility to serve both projects within the closed depression located
off site of the Tuscany project, and subject to specific conditions. This facility will be designed to
provide water quality retention for the Tuscany Plat as well as the Cottages West site, and will also
be sized to accommodate the existing storm overflow discharge from the Bellacarino subdivision
located west of the Tuscany site. The applicant will be required to provide storm drainage
improvements to comply with all applicable Core and Special Requirements outlined in the
KCSWDM, including surface water quantity and quality control. See Section Ix. C. of this report
for a detailed description of the proposed drainage facilities.
B.
Soils - The 1973 King County soils survey map lists the soils types for the subject site as Everett
Gravelly Sandy Loam (Eve) and (EvD). The EvC soils type, which has five to fifteen percent
slopes, slow to medium runoff and a slight to moderate erosion hazard. The EvD soils type has 15
to 30 percent slopes, medium to rapid runoff, and a moderate to severe erosion hazard. Earth
4 The Cottages West is a proposed 40 unit senior housing project in 16 buildings on 9 acres, being processed under Use Process IV
review. A DNS was issued for the Cottages project on April 23, 2001.
00-104313-O0-SU
Page 3
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
Staff Report to the Hcaring Examiner
Consultants Inc. perfonned soils tests in December 2000.
C.
Topography - The site is rolling with a general slope from west to east towards the adjacent
Cottages West site. Average site slopes are ITom 10 to 20 percent, with a steep slope (as defined
by the FWCC) with an approximate 40 percent gradient, located on proposed lots 21 and 22 at the
southern end of the subject site. Steep slopes are also located on the Cottages West site adjacent to
lots 11 and 12 (Exhibit H). The applicant's geotechnical reports (Exhibit I) identify these off-site
slopes as up to 16 feet in height with an approximate 85 percent gradient. The report states that
these slopes were artificially created by a fonner gravel mining operation on the site in the 1970's,
and that poor conditions exist due to large leaning trees, steep un-vegetated slopes, and trees with
undennined root systems.
According to the applicant's environmental checklist, approximately 51 percent of the site will be
graded for plat improvements. These improvements will generally follow the alignment of the
sewer trunk line installed through the site in 1994. FWCC Section 20-179 states that, "". [a]1l
natural vegetation shall be retained on the site to be subdivided except that which will be removed
for improvements or grading approved in the preliminary subdivision or short subdivision." The
applicant is proposing a clearing and grading plan for those areas associated with the construction
of public improvements consistent with this code requirement (Exhibit J). As proposed, the
Tuscany lots will require only minimal grading against the right-of-way.
The applicant's July 6, 2000, geotechnical report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. (revisions
dated October 20, 2000, December 21, 2000, February 1, 2001, March 14, 2001, and May 30,
2001, Exhibit I) provides recommendations for proposed engineered retaining walls and rockeries
in and adjacent to the off-site steep slopes as well as related cut and fill, site, site preparation,
general earthwork, foundations, and site drainage. Proposed grading, use of retaining walls, and
related mitigation in these off-site steep slopes will re-contour, flatten, and stabilize the existing
slopes, thereby improving existing unstable conditions.
The report recommends a ten foot land surface modification setback ITom the top of the steep
slopes adjacent to lots 11 and 12, and a ten foot land surface modification setback from the top of
the steep slopes on lots 21 and 22, with an additional 15 foot structural setback; provided that the
fill slope recommendations in the report are implemented (i.e., setting the toe of the proposed fill
10 feet away from the top of the existing slope and keying the fill into the existing slope using
horizontal benches). The final grading plan will be reviewed with engineering plans review to
verify that excavation slopes and clearing limits are the minimum necessary to achieve reasonable
grades for building sites and slope stabilization.
In addition, as a recommended condition of preliminary plat approval, areas within the Tuscany
plat that meet the defmition of steep slope shall be located within a Native Growth Protection
Easement (NGPE). The NGPE designation shall be included on the face of the plat with the
following language:
"NGPE conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement. The
interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the
public health, safety, and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion,
maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE
imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of land subject to the
easement the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by the City of Federal
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
SÙ!ffReport to the Hearing Examiner
00-1 043 13-O0-SU
Page 4
Way, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the easement. The
vegetation within the easement may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed, or
damaged without express pennission from the City of Federal Way, which pennission
must be obtained in writing from the Director of Community Development Services."
Also, in order to further prevent future intrusion on steep slope areas, such as land surface
modification (LSM) or removal of vegetation, as noted in Condition #2 ofpreliminæy plat
approval, it is recommended that a fence be installed ten-feet from the top of the NGPE. The fence
shall be owned and maintained in perpetuity by the Homeowners Association.
In addition, based on site conditions, the applicant's geotechnical report, and the preliminæy
grading plan, a supplemental geotechnical analysis is recommended for site development. This
requirement is addressed as Condition # I of preliminæy plat approval, as recommended. Under
this condition, the applicant shall obtain the services of a qualified geotechnical engineer to review
final design and specifications; be present on site during all land surface modification activities;
verifY subsurface conditions; monitor construction activities; ensure implementation of the
recommendations of the geotechnical report; and provide the City with any additional
recommendations for plat construction and future home construction; including re-vegetation of
disturbed areas adjacent to steep slopes. Implementation of the recommendations in the applicant's
geotechnical report, and staff-recommended conditions of project approval will minimize
topographic and vegetation impacts and ensure slope and site stability. It will also identifY any
geotechnical conditions or requirements applicable to future lots and final plat review.
D.
Vegetation -The subject site is wooded, and primarily contains mature fITs, alders, Madrona, and
big leaf maples trees, with a native under story of shrubs. The August 1, 2000, Significant Tree
Inventory map prepared by Duncanson Company Inc. (revised Januæy 12,200 I, Exhibit K)
identifies 271 trees on the subject property that meet the FWCC definition of significant.
According to the grading plan, approximately 8- of these trees (30 percent of the significant trees)
are located within future right-of-way and utility easement areas and as such, will not be retained.
Road meandering around significant trees has been done to the extent possible based on
topographic constraints and existing points of connection. The September 26, 2000, Landscape
Plan prepared by Ned Gulbran (Exhibit L) submitted in confonnance with FWCC Section 20-158,
shows street trees installed within the rights-of-way. Retained significant trees outside of the right-
of-way will be regulated under FWCC Section 22-1568, "Significant Trees," and reviewed with
each residential building pennit.
The plat's open space obligation will be provided through fee-in-lieu payment, as requested by the
applicant and as authorized by the Parks Director, and as included as a recommended condition of
preliminæy plat approval. Payment is to be paid prior to final plat approval in accordance with
FWCC Section 20-155.
E.
Wildlife -The site will change from a 6.32 acre forested site to a 22 lot single-family residential
development. No evidence has been submitted which indicates that there are any state or federally
listed threatened or otherwise protected animal species located on the project site. Additionally, the
Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) Priority Habitats and Species map does not indicate
the presence of any priority habitats or species on or adjacent to the subject site. An April 4, 2000,
Wildlife Habitat Study (Exhibit M) prepared by 1. S. Jones was submitted with the preliminæy plat
application. The report concluded that while no priority species were identified within one mile of
OO-I04313-O0-SU
Page 5
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
StatTReport to the Hearing Examiner
the subject site, habitat connectivity and circuitIy within the vicinity is high due to an off-site
stream corridor and the Hylebos Wetland State Park. The wildlife report stated that these identified
corridors would remain within the off-site drainage feature located on the adjacent Cottages West
site. In order to reduce impacts upon wildlife, the report recommends three measures: (I) retain
large trees when possible; (2) use Best Management Practices to prevent sediment trom leaving the
site during construction; and (3) maintain a corridor of vegetation in the bottom of the off-site
drainage facility. These recommendations and supplemental geotechnical analysis, as
recommended pursuant to Condition #1, will reduce impacts on wildlife.
F.
Mapped Sensitive Areas - As noted previously, slopes meeting the FWCC definition of steep
slope are located on lots 21 and 22, and adjacent to lots II and 12 on the Cottages West site.
Specifically, lot 21 contains 446 square feet of steep slope area while lot 22 contains 2,832 square
feet of steep slope area. (Lot 21 is proposed at 9,970 square feet, while lot 22 is proposed at 9,732
square feet). The Cottages West steep slopes contain approximately 85 percent gradients, and were
artificially created by a fonner gravel mining operation. Pursuant to FWCC Division V, the City
may pennit land surface modifications adjacent to regulated slopes subject to an accepted
geotechnical report and related recommendations. The geotechnical report (Exhibit 1) contains
recommendations for grading, filling, retaining walls, and erosion control for stabilizing these steep
slope areas. The report recommends setbacks often feet trom the Cottages West slopes for
development on lots II and 12, and recommends setbacks of25 feet trom the top of the steep
slopes on lots 21 and 22.
The reports propose a series of retaining walls to be utilized to re-grade Cottages West slopes to a
maximum 2:H tol:V slope. The re-grading is recommended by the geotechnical consultant to
mitigate erosion problems in this area and eliminate the potential for injwy under present
conditions. Those existing conditions include large leaning trees, trees with undennined root
systems, and steep un-vegetated slopes. The report further states that water should not be allowed
to flow over the top of slopes. Pennanently exposed slopes should be seeded with appropriate
vegetation to reduce erosion and improve soil stability.
In addition, as a recommendation of preliminæy plat approval and as noted above in section Iv.c,
areas within the Tuscany plat that meet the definition of steep slope shall be located within a
NGPE, and a fence should be installed ten feet from the top of the NGPE.
These recommendations, and supplemental geotechnical analysis as recommended pursuant to
Condition # I, will minimize topographic impacts and insure slope stability.
The Federal Way Sensitive Areas Maps do not reveal the site to be in a problem area relative to
landslides, seismic hazards, erosion, wetlands, streams, or 100-year floodplains. A April 4, 2000,
Wetland Assessment prepared by JS Jones and Associates (revised October 19,2000) stated, with
the City's concurrence, that the closed depression east of the subject site did not meet the FWCC
definition of a wetland (Exhibit N).
v
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS
A.
Vicinity - The property is situated in the southern portion of the City, in a single-family residential
OO-1O4313-O0-SU
Page 6
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
StafTReport to the Hearing Examiner
area. The site is vacant. The majority of adjacent properties to the west and to the south are
developed with single-family residences on lots ranging from 7,600 to 10,000 square feet to the
west (plat of Bellacarino Woods), to an average of 15,000 square feet or more per dwelling unit to
the south (Plat of John Roe Addition). A multifamily complex with 402 units on 39 acres is
directly north of the subject site (Exhibit B). East of the site is presently vacant, although the
Cottages West senior housing facility is proposed in that location.
VI GENERAL DESIGN
A.
Subdivision Access and Roadway System - Public access into the subdivision will be provided by
the northern extension of 4th Avenue SW to SW 353" Street, and the creation of 3M Place SW.
These are classified by the FWCP as local access streets. SW 353" Place is a cul-de-sac with a
planter island at the end of the street. The applicant is proposing full street improvements on 3M
Place SW, including 28 feet of pavement, vertical curb/gutters, landscape strip, street trees,
sidewalk, and utility strip within the 52-foot right-of-way. The applicant has proposed half street
improvements on the eastern half of 4th Avenue SW, from SW 353M Street to SW 356th Street
consisting of20 feet of pavement, vertical curb/gutters, landscape strip, street trees, sidewalks, and
utility strip within the 32-foot right-of-way. The intersection of 4th Avenue SW and SW 353"
Street will be widened and improved with a sidewalk connecting to the existing street system on
SW 353M Street.
B.
Pedestrian System - Sidewalks will be provided along all lot frontages. Specifically, full street
improvements include five-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of 3" Place SW and the connections
to SW 353M Street. Half street improvements on 4th Avenue SW will include a five-foot wide
sidewalk on the easterly side of the street. The applicant will extend this sidewalk from the subject
site south along the east side of 4th Avenue South to SW 356th Street.
C.
Lot Layout - Tuscany lots range in size from 9,600 square feet to 13,660 square feet, with one
tract established to convey drainage overflow from the Bellacarino Woods subdivision west of the
subject site (Tract A). The proposed lots are generally rectangular in shape. Eight of the lots front
onto 4th Avenue South and 14 lots front on 3M Place SW. There is one flag lot. No view corridors
are located in or adjacent to the plat. Should any rockeries or retaining walls be required on the
subject site, their design should promote residential design themes through terracing, natural
material selection, placement of vegetation, and textural treatment as recommended in Condition
#6 of preliminary plat approval.
vn TRANSPORTATION
A.
Street Improvements -10 accordance with the FWCC, all street improvements must be dedicated as
City right-of-way and improved to City street standards. Specifically, full street improvements are
required for 3M Place SW including: 28 feet of pavement, vertical curbs, gutters, four-foot wide
planter strip with street trees, five-foot wide sidewalks, and a three-foot wide utility strip with
streetlights, within a 52-foot right-of-way width. The eastern portion of 4th Avenue SW shall be
improved with 20 feet of pavement, vertical curb/gutters, four-foot wide planter strip with street
trees, five-foot wide sidewalk, and a three-foot wide utility strip with streetlights within the 32-foot
right-of-way. South of the subject site, the eastern half of 4th Avenue SW shall be improved to SW
OO-I043\3-O0-SU
Page 7
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
StatTReport to the Hearin~ Examiner
356th Street with curb, gutter, planter strip with street trees, sidewalk, and streetlights. Maple trees
and Flowering Cheny trees are to be installed along the 4th Avenue SW and 3n1 Place SW rights-of-
way (Exhibit L). The applicant shall be responsible for the removal of the temporal)' cul-de-sac on
4th Avenue SW in conjunction with street improvements. Street lighting is required pursuant to
FWCC Section 22-1522. The applicant has proposed to install eight streetlights within the
subdivision and along 4th Avenue SW.
B.
Adequacy of Arterial Roads - This proposal has been reviewed under the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEP A). Based on the FWCC and the MDNS issued for the proposed action on June
23,200 I, the additional traffic to be generated by this development requires pro rata share
contributions for projects identified in the City's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
impacted by the proposed subdivision.
The applicant shall be required either to:
a.
Construct the following impacted TIP project as required by the Public Works
Department, prior to building occupancy; or,
Contribute the project's pro-rata share of the construction cost of the following TIP
project prior to issuance of building permits:
b.
As proposed and conditioned, the subdivision will adequately mitigate impacts to arterial streets.
vm PuBLIC SERVICES
A.
Schools - A September 29, 2000, School Access Inventory Analysis prepared by Duncanson
Company Inc. (Exhibit 0) was submitted with the preliminal)' plat application and was reviewed
by the Federal Way School District. Enterprise Elemental)', Illahee Junior High, and Federal Way
Senior High School will serve the proposed subdivision. Enterprise Elemental)' School is
immediately northwest of the site and elemental)' age students will walk to school through the
existing Bellacarino Woods Subdivision. Illahee Junior High School is less than one mile ftom the
subject site and students will walk to this school. Federal Way High School is more than one mile
ftom the subject site; bus transportation is provided for these students ftom the intersection of 7th
Avenue SW and SW 354th Street. The applicant will install off-site street improvements, including
a sidewalk along 4th Avenue SW to SW 356th Street, to provide a safe pedestrian corridor ftom the
subject site to meet the standards ofFWCC Section 20-l56(a). The School Access Inventory
Analysis concluded that the proposed preliminal)' plat met the planned walking route goals of the
Federal Way School District. The School District concurred with the conclusion subject to the off-
site improvements. The District also noted that school service areas are reviewed annually and may
be adjusted to accommodate enrollment growth and new development.
School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected at the time of building permit
00- tO4313-O0-SU
Page 8
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
StaffReoort to the Hearin~ Examiner
issuance, are currently $2,710.00 per single-family housing unit. School impact fees are
detennined on the basis of the School District's Capital Facilities Plan and are subject to annual
adjustment and update.
B.
Open Space - According to the 2000 Federal Way Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
Comprehensive Plan, the subject site is in park planning Area C. The nearest City park is the BP A
Trail, located 'I. of a mile from the west subject site. Other public parks in the vicinity include the
Hylebos Wetlands State Park approximately Y, mile northeast from the subject site, and Panther
Park, approximately 1.25 miles north of the subject site.
To provide adequate recreational opportunities commensurate with new residential development,
FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," requires dedication ofland on site for open space, or a fee-in-
lieu-of on site open space. Specifically, FWCC Section 20-l55(b) requires all residential
subdivisions to provide open space in the amount of, "...15 percent of the gross land area of the
subdivision site; or pay a fee in lieu of payment for all or portions of the open space area required."
Total open space required for this plat is 41,345 square feet (15 percent of the 275,430 square foot
parcel). Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, the applicant proposes to make a fee-in-lieu payment
for the required open space. The Parks Director has agreed to the fee-in-lieu. The fee would be
based on the assessed value of the land according to the King County Assessor's Office valuation
of the subject site at the time the fmal plat is reviewed, as recommended in Condition #5, and in
accordance with FWCC. This fee shall be paid to the City before the fmal plat is approved.
c.
Fire Protection - The King County Certificate of Water Availability indicates that water will be
available to the site in sufficient quantity to satisfY fife flow standards for the proposed
development. The Federal Way Fire Department requires that a fife hydrant be located within 350
feet of each lot. The applicant proposes the installation of one fife hydrant to serve the plat, in
addition to as existing hydrants in the 4th Avenue SW and SW 353'. Street rights-of-way. The fmal
location of the new hydrant must be approved by the Fire Department during preliminmy plat
engineering review.
IX UTILITIES
A.
Sewage Disposal - The applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system
managed by Lakehaven Utility District. A July 5, 2000, King County Certificate of Sewer
Availability (Exhibit P) indicates the District's capacity to serve the proposed development
through a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) between the applicant and the District. This
project extends the next leg of the Panther Lake Sewer Trunk Line with a 24-inch main line in 4th
Avenue SW to the southern border of the subject site.
B.
Water Supply - The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply and
distribution system managed by the Lakehaven Utility District. A July 5, 2000, King County
Certificate of Water Availability (Exhibit Q) indicates the District's capacity to serve the
proposed development through a Developer Extension Agreement (DEA).
C.
Drainage Facilities - A August 2, 2000, Preliminmy Technical Infonnation report (TIR), prepared
by Duncanson Company, Inc., (amended May 10,2001), was submitted and reviewed by the Public
0O-1O43!3-DO-SU
Page 9
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
Works Department (Exhibit F). The report identified the drainage basin for both the Tuscany site
and the adjacent Cottages West site as a man-made closed depression. The 1998 KCSWDM defmes
a closed depression as an area which is low-lying and either has no surface water outlet, or has
limited outlet such that during stonn events the area acts as a retention basin, with no more than
5,000 square feet of water surface area at overflow elevation.
In the SEP A checklist, the applicant describes that the existing low area on the Cottages West site
was once used as a sand and gravel quany (Exhibit E). Historically, this low area continued onto
an adjacent northern property into a forested ravine. In the late 1980's, when this adjacent property
was developed as an apartment complex, the existing low area was re-graded and filled. Re-
grading activity created the need for a retaining wall between the properties. According to the
applicant's drainage report, apartment construction did not provide for outfall from the original
low area and the subsequent re-grading and retaining wall created the closed depression by
removing the natural outfall.
On September 22, 2000, the applicant submitted a variance request to the KCSWDM for a shared
drainage facility for the Cottages West project and Plat of Tuscany. On October 17, 2000, the City
waived the requirement for separate drainage facilities and approved construction of one facility to
serve both projects within the closed depression subject to the following conditions, which must be
met prior to issuance of a construction pennit for project infrastructure:
1.
The applicant is required to design and construct the shared facility per the 1998
KCSWDM and Federal Way Addendum.
2.
The applicant is required to execute a Drainage Release Covenant to hold and release the
City harmless from any damage that may be caused by stonnwater from public rights of
way and contributing areas.
3.
The applicant shall release the City from any maintenance and or repair responsibilities
of the shared facility and the conveyance system from the public right-of-way to the
shared facility.
4.
The applicant shall establish an Operations and Maintenance Manual describing the
facility, maintenance and repair requirements, and an outline of maintenance tasks and
frequency that each task should be perfonned.
5.
Cottages West must grant ingress, egress easement to the City of Federal Way in order
to monitor the maintenance and operation of the private stonn drainage facility.
This drainage facility will be designed to provide water quality retention for the Tuscany Plat as
well as the Cottage West site, and will also be sized to accommodate existing stonn drainage over
flow discharge from the Bellacarino Woods subdivision located west of the Tuscany site. The
discharge will be accommodated in Tract A (Exhibit R). As conditioned under the MONS, if for
any reason the stonn drainage facility is not constructed under Cottages West pennits, the
applicant will be required to construct the approved stonn drainage facility in conjunction with
Tuscany preliminæy plat construction. In accordance with the FWCC, the stonn drainage facility
shall be constructed by the applicant per approved plans, inspected, and approved by the City
before fmal plat approval can be granted. The applicant is required to provide stonn drainage
improvements to comply with all applicable Core and Special Requirements outlined in the
OO-t043t3-O0-SU
Page JO
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
KCSWDM and City addendwns to the manual, including surface water quantity and quality
control.
During preliminary plat technical review, the Public Works Director may require additional stonn
drainage measures to be implemented to prevent accumulation of silt and sedimentation in stonn
drainage systems from clearing, grading, and street utility installation. These measures may
include, but are not limited to, seasonal restrictions on the clearing, grading, and street/utility
activities from October 3 I to March 30.
Pursuant to the FWCC and KCSWDM, and as recommended in Condition #4, any infiltration
facilities associated with the drainage system and visible from the subject site, the right-of-way, or
surrounding properties shall be vegetatively screened. Cyclone fencing, if used, shall be black or
dark green vinyl coated.
x
ANALYSIS OF DECISIONAL CRITERIA
The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types ofland
use applications. Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, Section 20-110, preliminary plat applications are
submitted to the hearing examiner for public hearing. The preliminary plat application and the
recommendation of the hearing examiner are submitted to the City Council for approval or disapproval.
A. Hearing Examiner Preliminary Plat Decisional Criteria - Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-126(c),
the hearing examiner may recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat only if the
following decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria and staff responses are provided below.
1.
The project is consistent with the FWCP.
SiaffComment: The application is subject to the adopted 2000 FWCP, which designates the
property as Single Family - High Density. The proposed land use, Single Family Residential,
with 9,600 square foot minimum lot size (RS-9.6), is consistent with density allowances and
policies applicable to this land use as established in the FWCP.
2.
The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted
by reference from the comprehensive plan.
Staff Comment: The preliminary plat application is required to comply with the provisions of
the FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22,
"Zoning"; and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development of the
residential subdivision will be required to comply with all applicable development codes and
regulations. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the preliminary plat
will comply with all provisions of the chapter.
3.
The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would pennit development of the site
consistent with the current Single Family High Density land use classification of the City's
FWCP and map. Proposed access and fife hydrant locations must meet all requirements of the
Federal Way Fire Department. Future development of the plat in accordance with applicable
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
StafTReport to the Hearing Examiner
OO-I04313-DO-SU
Page II
codes and regulations will ensure protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
4.
It is consistent with the design criteria listed in FWCC Section 20-2.
Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would promote the purposes identified in
FWCC Section 20-2 and the standards and regulations therein, as identified in the staff
report, including effective use of land, promotion of safe and convenient travel on streets,
provision for the housing needs of the community, and protection of environmentally
sensitive areas. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by City staff, the
preliminary plat application complies with all provisions of the chapter.
5.
It is consistent with the development standards listed in FWCC Sections 20-151 through 157,
and 20-178 through 187.
Staff Comment: Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of FWCC
Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22, "Zoning";
and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As proposed, and
as recommended by City staff, the preliminary plat application complies with all applicable
statutes, codes, and regulations.
XI FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on an analysis of the proposed action, the environmental record, and related decisional criteria,
the Department of Community Development Services finds that:
1.
The proposed action is to subdivide a vacant 6.32-acre parcel into 22 single-family lots with one
tract. Stonn drainage facilities will be provided on an adjoining property east of the subject site.
There are single-family residential land uses to the south and west of the subject site, a multi
family complex to the north, and a vacant site proposed to be developed as a senior housing facility
to the east.
2.
Zoning for the site is RS 9.6. The proposed residential subdivision and density is consistent with
existing adjacent land uses and zoning, and the project will be compatible with adjacent residential
uses provided all recommended conditions of preliminary plat approval are met.
3.
A Mitigated Environmental Determination of Non significance (MDNS) was issued for this
proposed action on June 23, 2001. No appeals were received and the decision was fmalized with no
modification. This detennination is incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
4.
Water and sewer facilities are available from the Lakehaven Utility District and are adequate to
serve the proposed development. Sewer facilities will include the extension of a 24-inch mainline
sewer trunk to the southern end of the subject site. It is the applicant's responsibility to secure all
necessary water and sewer services from the utility providers and services of other utility providers
as necessary.
5. The drainage basin for the site is a closed depression located on a property east of the subject site.
The City authorized construction of a drainage system within this closed depression to serve the
subdivision as well as the proposed Cottages West senior housing complex subject to specific
0O-I04313-OO-SU
Page 12
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
StafTReport to the Hearing Examiner
conditions. The drainage system design shall meet the KCSWDM standards and Federal Way
amendments subject to engineering plans review and approval. If, as conditioned under SEP A, the
storm drainage system is not constructed under Cottages West permits, the applicant will be
required to construct the approved storm drainage facility in conjunction with Tuscany prelimina¡y
plat construction.
6. Public access into the subdivision will be provided by the northward extension of 4th Avenue SW to
SW 353«1 Street, and the creation of3'd Place SW. Half street improvements to the eastern side of
4th Avenue SW and full street improvements within the 52-foot right-of- way of3'd Place SW are
required, as well as dedication to the City. As recommended in Condition #2, the applicant will be
required to remove the tempora¡y cul-de-sac in 4th Avenue SW in conjunction with street
improvements. As proposed, and as recommended pursuant to Condition #2, site access and street
design will be at the optimum locations and configurations for safe and adequate traffic circulation.
Channelization and street improvement plans, prepared per the City's engineering standards, are
subject to review and approval in conjunction with engineering plans review.
7.
Pedestrian connections from the subject site to Enterprise Elementa¡y School, which is located
northwest of the subject site, and to the senior high school bus stop will be provided via existing and
proposed sidewalks. Off site improvements to the eastern side of 4th Avenue SW between the
subject site and SW 356th Street are proposed by the applicant to provide a safe walking route of
travel for junior high school students.
8.
Steep slopes exist on the southeast portions of lots 21 and 22, and adjacent to lots II and 12 on
the Cottages West site abutting the property to the east. The applicant's geotechnical engineer
explored site and subsurface conditions and provided geotechnical recommendations for site
preparation and general earthwork, steep slope fill placement and re-grading, foundations,
retaining walls, excavations, and side slopes. Supplemental geotechnical analysis and
recommendations may be required by the Public Works Director or Building Official, during
development of the site, as allowed by FWCC Section 22-1286. To ensure that there is no
development activity within steep slope areas on lots 21 and 22, Condition #2 as recommended,
will establish these areas in a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE). Implementation of the
report recommendations, as well as Condition # I of prelimina¡y plat approval as recommended,
will minimize topographic impacts and ensure slope stability related to plat improvements and
future building construction.
9.
The subject site contains 271 trees that meet the FWCC definition of significant. The applicant has
proposed to remove 80 significant trees with site grading for the installation of roadways and
utilities. The remaining significant trees will be regulated under FWCC Section 22-1568 during
residential building permit review. As recommended in Condition #3, the landscape plan shall
include slope stabilization measures to be installed in conjunction with plat construction, storm
drainage facility or tract screening, street trees, and tree conservation techniques.
10. The recreation and open space needs of subdivision residents will be met through payment to the
City's Parks Department of an optional fee-in-lieu providing the on-site open space, which shall be
utilized to improve recreation opportunities within the park planning area of the subject property.
Pursuant to Condition #5 ofprelimina¡yplat approval as recommended, such fee shall be
calculated and paid prior to final plat recording.
OO-IO4313..QO-SU
Paget3
Pœliminary Plat of Tuscany
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner
11. The proposed preliminary plat is pennitted by FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and Chapter
22, "Zoning." Lots that are rectangular in shape and that range in size from 9,600 square feet to
13,660 square feet in size are consistent with the standards of Article 1Il of the FWCC Chapter 20.
As recommended, residential design themes and treatments shall be incorporated into any rockeries
or retaining walls constructed on the Tuscany site.
12. The proposed subdivision and all attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the FWCP;
FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; FWCC
Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable codes and regulations. As proposed, and with
conditions as recommended by staff, the preliminary plat is consistent with the FWCP and all
applicable codes and regulations. The applicant is responsible to obtain outside agency pennits as
applicable.
13. Prior to [mal plat approval and recording, all required and approved improvements will be
constructed, or the improvements appropriately bonded per City code requirements, and [mal plat
documents will be reviewed for consistency with the conditions of preliminary plat approval and all
applicable codes, regulations, and standards pertaining to [mal plat review.
xn RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on review of this application, the MONS, and pertinent decisional criteria, the Department of
Community Development Services recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the
following conditions:
1.
The applicant shall obtain the services of a qualified geotechnical engineer to review engineering
design and specifications; be present on site during all land surface modification activities,
including excavation of infiltration pond to ensure the pond bottom is established into soils which
can support infiltration rates; veri/)' subsurface conditions; inspect and conduct compaction tests
for the roads, building lots, infiltration pond, and retaining walls; ensure implementation of the
recommendations in the geotechnical reports; and provide the City with any additional geotechnical
recommendations for plat construction and future homes on the site, including re-vegetation of
disturbed areas and lot drainage adjacent to the steep slope, subject to determination by the
Directors of Community Development Services and Public Works. In addition, prior to [mal plat
approval, the infiltration system shall be required to be operational and approved by the Public
Works staff. This shall include infiltration tests conducted by the applicant and visual inspections
to demonstrate that the design infiltration rate is being achieved and the system is functioning
properly.
2.
Prior to final plat recording, the preliminary plat map shall be revised as follows:
(a) Notation that all driveways must be set back a minimum distance of25 feet /Tom adjacent
intersections.
(b) Language reflecting Conditions 2, 3, 4, and 5 /Tom the October 17,2000, shared stonn
00-104313-O0-SU
Page 14
Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
StafTRenort to the Hearin. Examiner
drainage facility variance.
(c) Language dedicating all public rights-of-way to the City of Federal Way.
Cd) Language establishing responsibility for maintenance of cul-de-sac landscaping with
homeowners.
(e) Language establishing responsibility of the applicant for the removal of the temporaty cul-de-
sac on 4th Avenue SW in conjunction with roadway improvements.
Cf) Half street improvements to the east side of 4th Avenue SW ftom SW 353'" Street to SW
356th Street, including full curb, gutter, street trees, planter strip, sidewalk, and street lighting.
(g) Steep slope areas on proposed lots 21 and 22 established in a NGPE with language stating
that:
"NGPE conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the easement,
that the interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that
benefit the public health, safety, and welfare, including control of surface water and
erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat.
The NGPE imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers ofland
subject to the easement the obligation, enforceable on behalf of the public by the
City of Federal Way, to leave undisturbed all trees and other vegetation within the
easement. The vegetation within the easement may not be cut, pruned, covered by
fill, removed, or damaged without express pennission ftom the City of Federal Way,
which pennission must be obtained in writing ftom the Director of Community
Development Services."
(h) Installation of a fence located ten feet ftom the top of the NGPE to be installed prior to fmal
plat recording, and to be owned and maintained in perpetuity by the homeowners association.
Ci) Any geotechnical restrictions and conditions for future building development, pursuant to
Condition #1, above.
3.
Prior to issuance of construction pennits, a fmallandscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape
architect shall be submitted for review and approval by the Director of Community Development
Services, and shall include the following elements:
(a) If constructed with the Tuscany project, visual screening of all property boundaries of the
infiltration tract (and fencing if applicable) ftom adjacent properties and the 3'" Place SW
right-of-way.
(b) Street trees on the project side of 4th Avenue SW, and both sides of 3'" Place SW internal plat
street.
OO-I04313-OO-SU
Page 15
Prelimioa!)' Plat ofTuseany
StaffReoort to the Heario. Examiner
(c) Vegetative screening of retaining walls on the Cottages West site.
(d) Cul-de-sac landscaping.
(e) Re-vegetation of disturbed slope areas (as recommended by the geotechnical engineer
pursuant to Condition #1, above).
(f) Significant tree identification and replacement.
4.
Prior to issuance of construction pennits, the applicant shall submit elevations and design
descriptions of fences, where visible ftom rights-of-way or pedestrian areas, showing that these
utilize natural materials and colors and that fencing of the infiltration pond (if required by the
KCSWDM) is vinyl coated in a dark color and screened by landscaping (pursuant to an approved
landscape plan); for review and approval by the Directors of Community Development Services
and Public Works.
5.
Prior to fmal plat recording, the applicant shall pay the alternative fee-in-lieu of providing on site
open space, as proposed and accepted, which fee shall be calculated on the basis of 15 percent of
the most recent assessed valuation or MAl appraisal at that time, subject to approval by the
Directors of Parks and Community Development Services.
6.
Prior to issuance of construction pennits, the applicant shall submit elevations and design
descriptions of retaining walls and rockeries for review and approval by the Directors of
Community Development and Public Works; showing that these are located outside of the right-of-
way, that these are harmonious with existing adjoining residential uses and promote residential
design themes through such means as teITacing, orientation, natural material selection, use of
vegetation, and textural treatment.
xm LIST OF EXIDBITS
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Reduced Scale Preliminary Plat of Tuscany
Vicinity Map
Legal Description
Mitigated Detennination ofNonsignificance (MDNS), June 23, 2001
Staff Evaluation with Environmental Checklist, June 23, 2001
Preliminary Technical Infonnation Report (TIR) Prepared by Duncanson Company, Inc., August 2,
2000; Addenda including Water Quality Calculations, November 11, 2000; State Storage
Calculations, December 22, 2000; Emergency Overflow Calculations, December 21, 2000, and
Addendum, May 10,2001
City Waiver, October 17,2000
Reduced Scale Site Survey prepared by Duncanson Company, Inc., August I, 2000
Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc., July 6, 2000, revised October
20,2000, revised December 21, 2000, revised February 1,2001, revised March 13, 2001, and
revised May 30, 2001
Reduced Scale Preliminary Grading Plan prepared by Duncanson Company, Inc., August 1, 2000,
revised December 15,2000, revised February 1,2001, and revised April 12, 2001
Reduced Scale Significant Tree Survey prepared by Duncanson Company, Inc., August 1, 2000,
revised December 15,2000, revised February 1,2001, and revised Apri112, 2001
G.
H.
I.
1.
K.
QO-I04313'{)Q-SU
Page 16
Preliminary Plat ofTuscany
StafTRepor! to the Hearing Examiner
1. Reduced Scale Landscape Plan prepared by Ned Gulbran, ASLA, September 26, 2000
M. Wildlife Study prepared by J. S. Jones and Associates Inc., April 4, 2000
N. Wetland Assessment prepared by J. S. Jones and Associates, April 14, 2000, revised October 19,
2000
School Access Inventory Analysis prepared by the Duncanson Company, September 29,2000
King County Certificate of Sewer Availability, July 5, 2000
King County Certificate of Water Availability, July 5, 2000
Reduced Scale Conceptual Drainage and Utility Plan
O.
P.
Q.
R.
TRANSMITTED TO THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFIER:
Federal Way Hearing Examiner
Applicant - Brooks Powell, Powell Homebuilders
Engineer - IeffDye, Duncanson Company, Ine
""""""'tIn '1""
OO-I04313'()O-SU
Page 17
Prelimina¡y Plat ofTuscany
St.ffRenor! to the He.rio. Examioer
MEETING DATE:
October 16,2001
ITEM#
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
0 CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
ATTACHMENTS: City Council Resolution for adoption of the preliminary plat; staff memo to City Council! Land Use
Transportation Committee dated September 25, 2001; Hearing Examiner Report and Recommendation dated September 6,
200 I; staff report to the Hearing Examiner dated August 28, 200 I. (A notebook including all exhibits from the staff report to
the Hearing Examiner is located in the City Council office). Pursuant to the LUTC's request at their October 1st meeting,
also attached is a memorandum from the Public Works Department regarding access to proposed Lot 35, with exhibits
prepared by the applicant.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Request for preliminary plat approval for a 40-lot single-family subdivision on 16.4 acres
pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20 (Subdivisions). The proposed Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary
plat is located in the southwesterly portion of the City on the east side of Hoyt Road SW, between SW 329th and SW 340th
Streets.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On October 1,2001, the Land Use! Transportation Committee
(LUTC) voted to forward a recommendation for approval for the proposed preliminary plat to the full Council, with no
changes to the Hearing Examiner's recommendation, contingent upon the applicant providing additional infonnation
regarding the access to proposed Lot 35 for the Public Works Department's review and recommendation to the City Council.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat subject to the Hearing Examiner
recommendations dated September 6, 200 I."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~.
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
" APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDillEFERREDINO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
RESOLUTION NO.
DRAFT
/Ó(C¡(ð(
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING WITH
CONDITIONS THE COTTAGES A T HOYf ROAD PRELIMINARY
PLAT,FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. 98-104394-00SU.
WHEREAS, the applicantRick Williams, through his agent Michael Davis, applied to the City
of Federal Way for preliminary plat approval to subdivide certain real property known as the Cottages at
Hoyt Road and consisting of approximately 16.4 acres into forty (40) single family residential lots located in
the 33300 Block of Hoyt Road SW, on the east side ofthe street; and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2001, an Mitigated EnvironmentalDetenninationofNonsignificance
(MDNS) was issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services
pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C; and
WHEREAS, no comments which raised issues which required a change in the MDNS were
submitted to the Department of Community Development Services; and
WHEREAS, no appeals of the MDNS were submitted to the Department of Community
Development Services; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner on August 28, 200 I, held a public
hearing concerning the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing, on August 28, 2001, the Federal Way
Land Use Hearing Examiner issued a written Report and Recommendationcontainingfindings,conclusions,
and recommending approval of the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat subject to conditions set forth.
therein; and
WHEREAS, on October 1,2001 the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee
considered the record and the Hearing Examiner recommendation and voted to forward a recommendation
Resolution No. ---' Page #t
-
for approval of the proposed Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat to the full City Council, with no
changes to the Hearing Examiner recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has jurisdiction and authority pursuant to Section
20-127 of the Federal Way City Code to approve, deny, or modify a preliminary plat and/or its conditions;
and
WHEREAS, on_-----, 2001, the City Council considered the written record and the
Report and Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner on the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat,
pursuantto Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicableCity Codes;
Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY REsOL VB As FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Adoption of Findings of Fact and Conclusions.
1.
The findings of fact and conclusions of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's
Recommendation, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, are hereby adopted as the
findings and conclusions of the Federal Way City Council. Any finding deemed to be a conclusion, and any
conclusion deemed to be a finding, shall be treated as such.
2.
Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report and Hearing
Examiner's recommendation, and conditions of approval as established therein, the proposed subdivision
makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces,
drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary
waste, parks and recreation, play grounds, schools and schools grounds, and all other relevant facts as are
required by City Code and state law, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe
walking conditions for sfudents who walk to and from school.
3.
The public use and interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval granted
Resolution No. ----' Page #2
herein.
Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the recommendationofthe Federal Way Land
Use Hearing Examiner and findings and conclusions contained therein as adopted by the City Council
immediately above, the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat, Federal Way File No. 98-104394-00SU, is
hereby approved, subject to conditions as contained in the Recommendation of the Federal Way Land Use
Hearing Examiner dated September 6, 2001 (Exhibit A).
Section 3. Conditions of ApprovalintegraL Theconditionsofapprovalofthepreliminaryplat
are all integral to each other with respect to the City Council finding that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having jurisdiction over the
subject matter declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat
approval granted in this resolution shall be deemed void and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the
City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or
conditions and conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes
appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare and other factors as required by
RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules, and regulations, and forward such
recommendation to the City Council for further action.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase ofthis resolution should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or-
phrase of this resolution.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date
Resolution No. ------'-, Page #3 ,--
of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by
the Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED By THE CITY COUNCIL ÛF THE CITYÛF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON,
THIS_DAYÛF
,200 I.
CITY ÛF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR MIIΠPARK
AITEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED As To FORM:
CITY AITORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERIC
PASSED By THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
Resolution No. ---' Page 114
I nterollice
MEMORANDUM
Federal Way Dep't of Public Works
Development Services Division
To:
David Graves
From: Jim Femling
Subject: Cottages at Hoyt
Date: October 8, 2001
David,
Public Works has review the narrative and drawing for Lot 35 submitted by Touma Engineers, and concurs
with the Engineer that access can be provided to lot 35 as depicted in the drawing, and that an approved fire
sprinkler system must be installed in the home. In order to facilitate the driveway the southern property line for
Lot 36 will be moved to the north 5-feet per the drawing from Touma Engineers.
If you have any question call me 4196.
NARRATIVE
October 5, 2001
TO:
Jim Femling, City of Federal Way Public Works
FROM: Tom Touma, Touma Engineers
SUBJECT:
Evaluatiou of Proposed Lot 35 - Preliminary Plat of Cottages at Hoyt
Grading and Access to Lot 35
The intent of this transmittal is to respond to the Council Transportation Committee and Public Works
Director concerns about the future development of Lot 35. We have prepared a site-grading plan depicting
a viable option to access and erect a home structure on Lot 35. A copy of the site-grading plan is enclosed
with this naITalive. A 15-foot driveway is designed at a maximum slope of 15 percent to provide access
Irom the cul-de-sac to a possible split-level structure to be constructed at the westerly portion of the lot.
The new structure will maintain a 5-foot building setback adjacent to proposed Lots 36 and 37. The
driveway is located on the lot and maintains a 5-foot setback from adjacent Lot 36.
The length of driveway to serve a house on Lot 35 exceeds the maximum length of driveway allowed by
the Federal Way Fire Department. In order to mitigate the long driveway, the future O\mers of Lot 35
would be required to install sprinkler system for the new structure. We therefore recommend a new
condition be added to the preliminary plat conditions of approval in order to satisfY the Fire Department
requirements.
Yours truly,
Mounir "TOM" Touma, PE/PLS
Project Engineer
Enclosures
Page I of 1
,,'
"
"
"
"
"
"
" , ,
, , , ,
\
--
, -
(' ,-
,
\
I
()
I)
~
(\
"-
'I ~
~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
To:
City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee
FROM:
Kathy McClun Director of Community Development Services
VIA:
Da'Jid
RE:
DATE:
September 2S, 2001
1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Land Use and Transportation Committee forward to the City Council a
recommendation approving the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat with conditions, based on the
findings and conclusions in the September 6, 2001, Hearing Examiner Report.
II.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
The applicant requests approval of a 40-lot residential subdivision, as provided for under Federal
Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," subject to City Council approval.
III. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," the City Council issues a final decision at a public
meeting, after review of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. Consistent with City procedures,
preliminary plat applications are brought to the Land Use and Transportation Committee for review
and recommendation prior to review by the full Council.
IV. HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION
On September 6, 2001, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner issued a report and recommendation
(enclosed) to approve the proposed preliminary plat. The Hearing Examiner's recommendation
includes all conditions recommended by staff. The Examiner's recommendation was issued following
consideration of a staff report (enclosed) and testimony presented at an August 28, 2001, public
hearing subject to the following conditions:
1.
Stormwater conveyance, water quality and detention facilities used to control stormwater
runoff from the site shall be located in a stormwater tract dedicated to the City at the
time of final plat approval, unless located within improved public rights-of-way.
2.
All streets shall have a minimum pavement section of three (3) inches Class B asphalt
over seven (7) inches of crushed surfacing to support the traffic loads.
v.
3.
Tract E, labeled as a Native Growth Protection Easement shall be re-Iabeled as a Native
Growth Protection Area Tract. Provisions related to the preservation and enhancement of
native vegetation in this tract shall be included in the homeowners' association
documents and submitted to the City for review and approval prior to Final Plat approval.
4.
Consistent with the management recommendations of the Washington State Department
of Fish and Wildlife, during preliminary plat construction, snag creation techniques shall
be used to provide and enhance habitat opportunities for Pileated woodpeckers within
buffer Tract "E" and appropriate portions of Lot 3S. Within these areas large logs and
stumps shall be left on the ground. Dead and dying trees which are not hazardous to
surrounding properties shall be left in place and healthy replacement trees of sufficient
size to replace existing snags when they fall must be left in place. Prior to the issuance
of construction permits for the preliminary plat improvements, the applicant must submit
a management plan consistent with the DFW recommendations indicating the proposed
measures to provide and enhance habitat opportunities for Pileated woodpeckers within
buffer Tract "E" and appropriate portions of Lot 35, to the City's Community Development
Department for review and approval.
5.
Clearing for the construction of the plat improvements, including roads, stormwater
improvements, and utilities, shall be generally consistent with the clearing limits depicted
on the Site Grading Plan, dated April 27, 2001, that was prepared by Touma Engineers as
part of the preliminary plat application materials. The clearing limits referenced above
are the approximate clearing limits necessary for road, stormwater improvements, and
utility grading, and may be modified with the approval of the Community Development
and Public Works Departments during final engineering review as required to reflect
changes in road, stormwater improvements, and utility designs, if any. The remaining
clearing beyond these limits necessary for development of the residential lots shall not be
performed until such time as approved permits are issued for development of the
residential lots.
6.
Clearing and grading activities shall be restricted during the wet season, October 1st to
April 30th. No clearing and or grading activities shall occur during this period unless
previously approved in writing by the Public Works Director.
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
November 16, 1998
Date of application for 59-lot cluster subdivision.
December 11, 1998
Date application determined complete.
Notice of application issued.
December 14, 1998
Revised to 40-lot "traditional" plat and re-submitted to City.
August 18, 2000
MDNS Environmental determination issued.
May 26, 2001
August 28, 2001
Hearing Examiner Public Hearing. (Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-126, the
Hearing Examiner issues a recommendation to the City Council.)
September 6, 2001
Hearing Examiner issues recommendation of conditional approval of
preliminary plat to the City Council.
October 1, 2001
City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting. (This
2
committee forwards a recommendation to the full Council for a decision
at a public meeting [see Section VII, below].)
VI. DEŒ5IONAL CRITERIA
Except as specifically noted in FWCC Section 20-127, the scope of the City Council review is limited
to the record of the Hearing Examiner public hearing; oral comments received at the public meeting
(provided these do not raise new issues or information not contained in the Examiner's record); and
the Examiner's report. These materials shall be reviewed for compliance with decisional criteria set
forth in FWCC Section 20-126(c), as noted below:
1.
Consistency with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan;
2.
Consistency with all applicable provisions of the Chapter (FWCC Ch. 20), including those
adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan;
3.
Consistency with the public health, safety, and welfare;
4.
Consistency with the design criteria listed in section 20-2; and
5.
Consistency with the development standards listed in sections 20-151 through 157, and 20-178
through 20-187.
Findings for determining that the application is consistent with these decisional criteria are set forth
on pages 2-6, of the Hearing Examiner's report and recommendation.
VII. COUNŒL ACITON
After consideration of the record, the City Council may, by action approved by a majority of the total
membership, pursuant to FWCC Sec. 20-127:
1.
Adopt the recommendation and approve the Preliminary Plat; or
2.
Reject the recommendation and deny the Preliminary Plat; or
3.
Remand the preliminary plat back to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to FWCC Section 20-
127(b); or
4.
Adopt its own recommendations. The Council may then:
a. Approve the Preliminary Plat; or
b. Disapprove the Preliminary Plat; or
c. Require or approve a minor modification to the Preliminary Plat pursuant to FWCC 20-
127(d).
A draft resolution recommending approval of the proposed application as recommended by the
Hearing Examiner is included.
EXHIBITS
A.
B.
C.
HEARING EXAMINER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, SEPTEMBER 6, 2001
STAFF REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER, AUGUST 28, 2001*
Crrv CoUNOL DRAFT RESOLUTION FOR PREUMINARY PLAT ApPROVAL
* Note: Not all copies of staff reports include all exhibits as listed. A full packet including all exhibits to the
Hearing Examiner is located in the City Council office.
4
)q
"\\ ~~
\\
?IIGH POINT R,4.RK OIV. 3
\\ õ / :: """"" ;;;
UNPLA TTED
'<,::
i /~' '.
~<...~
~
,i ---,,--
J ¡ t -
I '. "':t
~ Ð ñ------è)
ë aiL :t
~\.Ir--;g
\ ¡~ Õ; Z
\ --------;
\ ::; ""D
: »
: ------:u
r- õ; A;
\.
---\ ::::~~
. <0 -
.. \!".L--~
"
a
I;
:1
,-
I~
~ SCALE 1"=50'
;g
~
..
~
,
!
COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD
Pf1E1.JM/NARY PI.A T
FOR RIa< II1WAM
¡g.m:a ~
::;:'0:::::"---:;==
~
~
¡.
õ
~
~
ì:i
!:¡
<:
!ii
~
~
<:
~
(,¡
!:2
'"
:-<
~
¡¡:
'"
a
~
~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page - I
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
)
)
)
)
FWHE# 01-06
COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD
98-104394-00-SU
98-104393-00-SE
I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval of a 16.9 acre parcel into a 40
lot single family residential subdivision.
II. PROCEDURAL INFORMA nON
Hearing Date:
Decision Date:
August 28, 2001
September 6,2001
At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence:
1.
David Graves, Contractual Planner for City of Federal Way
2.
Mike Davis, representing applicant, 27013 Pacific Highway South #353, Des
Moines, WA 98198
3.
Dan Catron 32230 45th St. SW, Federal Way, WA 98q23
Pamela Kramer 33175 42nd Place SW, Federal Way, WA 98023
4.
5.
Robert Stiers, 3322543"' Ave. SW, Federal Way, WA 98023
6.
Pat Curran, 33180 42nd PI. SW, Federal Way, WA 98023
At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these
proceedings:
1.
Staff Report with all attachments
(! :4. ~
M~
Page - 2
2.
Letter from Steven Jones dated August 28, 2001
3.
Letter from Craig Ramsey dated August 22, 2001
4.
Letter from Ted Kramer dated August 28, 2001
5.
Power Point presentation
6.
Letter from Dan Catron
7.
Letter from Dan and Pat Curran
III. FINDINGS
1.
The Hearing Examiner has heard testimony, viewed the site and area, admitted
documentary evidence into the record, and taken this matter under advisement.
2.
The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable
policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit "1" and
incorporated in its entirety by this reference.
3.
All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the
Federal Way City Code (FWCC).
4.
The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in an irregularly shaped, 16.4
acre parcel of property abutting the east side of Hoyt Road north of its intersection
with SW 340th St. within the City of Federal Way. The parcel, covered with second
growth Douglas fir trees, slopes down hill from east to west and from south to north.
The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to allow subdivision of the site into
40 single family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet.
5.
The preliminary plat map shows a looped internal plat road with two accesses onto
Hoyt Road and cul-de-sacs extendin~ to the north and south from the loop road.
The map also shows a storm drainage detention pond in the northwest corner
adjacent to Hoyt Road, a 15 foot wide buffer along the north property line adjacent
to the High Poìnt Park Division 3 subdivision, a 50 foot wide buffer along the east
property line adjacent to the High Point Park Division 1 subdivision, and a 15 foot
wide buffer along the south property line adjacent to the Wedgewood Division 3
Page - 3
6.
subdivision.
Single family residential homes in the High Point Park Division 3 subdivision to the
north, the High Point Park Division 1 subdivision to the east, and in the Wedgewood
Division 3 subdivision to the south abut the north, east, and south property lines.
Hoyt Road abuts the west property line, and properties to the west of Hoyt Road are
improved with single family residential homes.
7.
The parcel is located within the Single Family Residential (RS) zone classification
of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). Section 22-631 FWCC authorizes detached
dwelling units as outright permitted uses in the RS-7.2 zone classification with a
minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. Said section also requires structural setbacks
of 20 feet from the front yard (street) and five feet from the side and rear yards.
Structures may extend a maximum of 30 feet above average grade. Abutting
parcels to the north and east are also located within the RS-7.2 zone classification,
while parcels to the south are within the RS-9.6 classification which authorizes
single family homes on minimum 9,600 square foot lots. Parcels to the west across
Hoyt Road are within the RS-7.2, 9.6, and 15.0 classifications. Since the minimum
lot size will equal 7,200 square feet, the project complies with the RS-7.2
classification. The project will be compatible with surrounding development which
has occurred in accordance with City zoning.
8.
A visit to the site establishes that the parcel appears to be one of the last remaining
undeveloped parcels in the area. Many new subdivisions and other development
has occurred in the area in the recent past to include the subdivision to the east and
north. A single family subdivision constructed in accordance with conditions of
approval and City ordinances should fit in well with the existing neighborhood.
9.
Concerns were raised regarding the ability of the applicant t.o control storm water
runoff from the site and the fact that the storm drainage pond will accommodate only
a ten year storm event. The applicant must design its storm drainage improvements
in accordance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual and the
City of Federal Way Addendum to the manual. The applicant will install storm water
collection and conveyance systems for all paved areas and will collect and route
water to the on-site detention facility. Touma Engineers prepared a storm drainage
report for the preliminary plat (Exhibit "Eft to the staff report) which shows that a
majority of lot 35 consisting of 3.73 acres will bypass the on-site drainage facilities.
Furthermore, because a project called North Shore Division 2 has diverted 100
acres away from the drainage basin within which the plat is located, the City
properly determined that a design to accommodate the two and 10 year, seven day
Page - 4
10.
11.
12.
storm peaks were appropriate for the pond. The applicant also increased the
detention volume by 30% over the ten year event. The City Public Works
Department must approve the applicant's storm drainage plan.
Concerns were raised regarding the potential for erosion since the geotechnical
engineering study performed by Terra Associations, Inc., identified the soils on site
as having a moderate to very severe potential for erosion. Concerns were also
raised regarding the amount of grading necessary to prepare the site for
constructing single family homes. The geotechnical engineering study notes that the
applicant revised the grading plan as requested by the City to limit grading to that
needed for roadways. The graded areas are generally limited to 2:1 slopes which
reduces the disturbance of vegetation on the site. The geotechnical report
concluded that the revised grading plans prepared by Touma Engineers are in
general conformance with the geotechnical recommendations and the City's
request. The geotechnical engineer recommended that grading on lots and
roadways be performed concurrently so that the completed lots are at a potential
final grade for individual builders, and to reduce potential problems created by
grading on individual lots. However, the applicant agreed to honor the City's request
and grade only the roads initially and then each lot individually. Such will preserve
on-site vegetation and will limit mass grading to the westem portion of the site near
Hoyt Road.
While testimony at the hearing referred to slopes as much as 75% on the site, the
City and the applicant's engineers agree that a majority of on-site slopes range from
15% to 25%. However, limited areas in the eastern portion of the site and larger
areas adjacent to the easUwest ravine in the north portion of the site have slopes
of 40% or greater. Only those slopes associated with the ravine are classified as
"steep slope hazard" areas. The applicant must submit a temporary erosion and
sedimentation control (TESC) plan for approval by the Director of Public Works prior
to any soil disturbing activities. Implementation of the TESC-plan along with best
management practices will prevent and/or minimize impacts from erosion during the
construction phase of the project. Post construction erosion will be minimized by
implementation of the storm water drainage plan and stabilization of disturbed
areas.
As previously found, the site is heavily vegetated with Douglas fir, other evergreen
and deciduous species, and a thick understory. As previously found, the applicant
will retain all natural vegetation on the site except that which will be removed for
grading and home construction. The applicant conducted a tree survey in
accordance with Section 22-1568 FWCC, the significant tree provisions. The tree
Page - 5
13.
14.
survey identified 590 trees larger than 12 inches in diameter located outside of the
grading and clearing limits. Sections 20-186 and 22-1568 FWCC require retention
of significant trees located outside of the grading and clearing limits until building
permits are issued for single family lots. After construction of the roads and utilities,
approximately 392 total trees larger than 12 inches in diameter will remain. Most of
the significant trees to be retained are located on the easterly portion of the site as
grading will not occur in that area. Trees will be lost on the west side of the parcel
which will support the roads and water detention facility. Since greater than 25% of
the significant trees located on the site will remain, no additional tree planting is
required. Construction of the plat as proposed complies with all City ordinances
requiring retention of significant trees.
Concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of the wildlife assessment as it did
not consider wetlands off site to the west and wildlife corridors. Portions of the site
will remain undisturbed and will provide habitat areas for urban wildlife. No
testimony or evidence asserts the presence of any State or federally listed,
threatened, or otherwise protected animal species on the site. The City's
Comprehensive Plan Priority Habitats and Species Map likewise does not list the
presence of any priority habitats or species on or adjacent to the site. The wildlife
study prepared by Terra Associates concludes that development of the property "will
not impact any listed species or habitats of concem". The study indicates the
presence of Pileated woodpeckers, a species designated as a candidate for listing
on the State's priority habitat and species list. The State Department of Fish and
WIldlife has prepared management recommendations for Pileated woodpeckers,
and such will be incorporated into the management of the buffer tracts and the
undeveloped portion of lot 35. While abutting and nearby residents reported seeing
eagles flying into and out of the site, no nests have been located.
Concems were raised regarding existing traffic problems in the area and the safety
of the proposed southern access onto Hoyt Road. The applicant must dedicate a
nine foot wide strip of property adjacent to Hoyt Road across the plat frontage and
increase the half street right-of-way width from 30 to 39 feet. The applicant must
also install frontage improvements to include concrete curb and gutter, planter strip,
sidewalk, and street lighting. The internal plat roads will also be public streets
constructed to City standards with concrete curbs and gutters, planter strips,
sidewalks, and streetlighting on both sides. Both the Public Works Department and
Fire Department have approved the subdivision access and roadway system. The
applicant will install sidewalks along all lot frontages within the subdivision and
along the Hoyt Road frontage. Mitigating measures in the MONS require the
applicant to contribute its prorata share of the construction cost of projects identified
Page - 6
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
in the City's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) which subdivision traffic will
impact. The applicant will contribute $10,800 for traffic improvements on 320'" St.
Concerns were raised regarding safe walking conditions for elementary school
children who will walk to Green Gables Elementary via Hoyt Road. The sidewalk
constructed by the applicant will tie into the sidewalk adjacent to the High Point Park
subdivision to the north. However, said sidewalk ends south of SW 329'" St. and
students currently walk along the shoulder of Hoyt Road to SW 329'" St. where a
crosswalk and an adult crossing guard ensure a safe crossing. Mitigating measures
in the MONS require the applicant to install a warning sign advising of the presence
of the school crossing and also to install curbing which will separate the commonly
used walkway from vehicle traffic along Hoyt Road. Such will assure safe walking
conditions for elementary students walking between Green Gables Elementary and
the subdivision. The applicant must also satisfy the City school impact fee ordinance
and pay to the Federal Way School District the sum of $2,710 per single family
housing unit.
Section 20-155(b) FWCC requires residential subdivisions to provide open space
in the amount of 15% of the gross land area of the site, or in the alternative, pay a
fee in lieu of open space for all or some portions of the area required. The open
space required for the preliminary plat calculates to 2.46 acres and the Federal Way
Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department has reviewed and accepted
the applicant's proposal to pay a fee in lieu of providing on-site open space.
The City of Tacoma will provide both domestic water and fire flow to the site in
accordance with City standards, and the applicant will construct a fire hydrant within
350 feet of each lot.
lakehaven Utility District has provided a Certificate of Sewer Availability and will
serve each lot in the subdivision with sanitary sewers. As previously found, the City
of Tacoma will provide both domestic water and fire flow to the site and has
provided a Certificate of Water Availability.
Prior to obtaining a recommendation of approval of a preliminary plat to the Federal
Way City Council, the applicant must establish that the request satisfies the criteria
set forth in Section 20-126(c) FWCC. Findings on each criteria set forth therein are
hereby made as follows:
A.
The project complies with the adopted Federal Way Comprehensive Plan
which designates the parcel as Single Family High Density.
Page - 7
B.
C.
The preliminary plat is consistent with all applicable provisions of the FWCC
including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan. The
applicant must comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Environmental
Policy; Chapter 20, Subdivisions; and Chapter 22, Zoning as well as other
applicable codes and regulations.
The project will be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare if
developed in accordance with conditions of approval, the mitigating
measures set forth in the MONS, and applicable provisions of the FWCC.
O.
The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the design criteria set forth
in Section 20-2 FWCC. The plat provides water, sewage, storm drainage,
and recreational areas. The plat will also promote safe and convenient travel
on streets and provide proper ingress and egress. It will also provide for the
housing needs of the community.
E.
The preliminary plat complies with the development standards set forth in
Sections 20-151 through 157 and Section 20-158 through 187.
Neighbors raised concerns regarding development of the preliminary plat both in
writing and oral testimony. However, no expert testimony or studies were presented
to contradict any of the applicant's or the City's experts. It appeared to the Examiner
that both City staff and the applicant had considered the concerns raised by
residents and addressed them in the plat design as much as reasonably possible.
The plat provides significant buffers between residential areas where the code
requires none, and the applicant will not engage in mass grading of lots even
though recommended by the geotechnical engineer. As stated by the Washington
Court of Appeals in Maranatha Minino v. Pierce County, 59 '!'In. App 795 (1990):
20.
The only expert testimony in the record shows that the mitigation
measures would prevent ground water contamination. The fish
hatchery operators advise that the. project would not affect their
operations. The Examiner's findings show that Maranatha's
proposals would mitigate the impact of dust particulates. The draft
EIS stated that proposed improvements to roads and a bridge in
the area would allow for "safe and comfortable" travel on affected
roads. The only opposing evidence was generalized complaints
from displeased residents. Community displeasure cannot be the
basis of a permit denial. 59 Wn. App 795 at 804.
Page - 8
In the present case, while citizens have raised significant concerns, the applicant
and the City have responded to all such concerns and provided amenities not
required by code.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions:
1.
The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and decide the issues presented
by this request.
2.
The proposed preliminary plat of Cottages at Hoyt Road complies with all
requirements of the Federal Way City Code to include Section 20-126(c).
3.
The proposed preliminary plat makes appropriate provision for the public health,
safety, and general welfare for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, roads, alleys,
and other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary waste, parks
and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and safe walking
conditions for students who walk to and from school.
4.
The proposed preliminary plat will serve the public use and interest by providing an
attractive location for a single family residential subdivision in a growing area of the
City. Therefore, the Federal Way City Council should approve the proposed
preliminary plat subject to the following conditions:
1.
Stonnwater conveyance, water quality, and detention facilities used to control
stonnwater runoff from the site shall be located in a stonnwater tract
dedicated to the City at the time of final plat approval, unless located within
improved public rights-of-way. .
2.
All streets shall have a minimum pavement section of three inches Class B
asphalt over seven' inches of crushed surfacing to support the traffic loads.
3.
Tract E, labeled as a Native Growth Protection Easement, shall be re-Iabeled
as a Native Growth Protection Area Tract. Provisions related to the
preservation and enhancement of native vegetation in this tract shall be
included in the homeowner's association documents and submitted to the
City for review and approval prior to Final Plat approval.
Page - 9
4.
Consistent with the management recommendations of the Washington State
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), during preliminary plat
construction, snag creation techniques shall be used to provide and enhance
habitat opportunities for Pileated woodpeckers within buffer Tract "E" and
appropriate portions of Lot 35. Within these areas large lots and stumps
shall be left on the ground. Dead and dying trees that are not hazardous to
surrounding properties shall be left in place, and healthy replacement trees
of sufficient size to replace existing snags when they fall must be left in
place. Prior to the issuance of construction permits for the preliminary plat
improvements, the applicant must submit a management plan consistent with
the WDFW recommendations indicating the proposed measures to provide
and enhance habitat opportunities for Pileated woodpeckers within buffer
Tract "E" and appropriate portions of Lot 35, to the City's Community
Development Services Department for review and approval.
5.
Clearing for the construction of the plat improvements, including roads,
stormwater improvements, and utilities, shall be generally consistent with the
clearing limits depicted on the April 27,2001, Site Grading Plan that was
prepared by Touma Engineers as part of the preliminary plat application
materials. The clearing limits referenced above are the approximate clearing
limits necessary for road, stormwater improvements, and utility grading, and
may be modified with the approval of the Community Development Services
and Public Works Departments during final engineering review as required
to reflect changes in road, stormwater improvements, and utility designs, if
any. The remaining clearing beyond these limits necessary for development
of the residential lots shall not be performed until such time as approved
permits are issued for development of the residential lots.
6.
Clearing and grading activities shall be restricted during the wet season,
October 1st to April 30th. No clearing and or grading activities shall occur
during this period unless previously approved in writing by the Public Works
Director.
Page-IO
RECOMMENDATION:
The Federal Way City Council should approve the preliminary plat of Cottages at
Hoyt Road subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above.
DATED THIS ~ DAY OF September, 2001.
I {)l\'~
TRANSMITTED THIS ~ DAY OF September, 2001, to the following:
APPLICANT:
Rick Williams
19904 Des Moines Memorial Drive
Seattle, WA 98148
AGENT:
Michael Davis
Davis Consulting, Inc.
27013 Pacific Highway South, PMB No. 353
Des Moines, WA 98198
OWNER:
Rick Williams
19904 Des Moines Memorial Drive
Seattle, WA 98148
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Stiers 33225 43rd Ave. SW Federal Way, WA 98023
Paul Kramer 33175 42nd PI. SW Federal Way,. WA 98023
Dan Catron 32230 45th PI. SW Federal Way, WA 98023
Pat Curran 3318042"' PI. SW Federal Way, WA 98023
Robert LaBounty 33313 41st Ave. SW Federal Way, WA 98023
David Tresdale 12525 Willows Road #101 Kirkland, WA 98034
Tom Touma 6632 S. 191" PI. Ste. E102 Kent, WA 98003
City of Federal Way
clo Chris Green
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW, ACTION
Pursuant to Section 20-127, following receipt of the final report and recommendation of
the hearing examiner, a date shall be set for a public meeting before the city council.
The city council review of the preliminary plat application shall be limited to the record of
the hearing before the hearing examiner, oral comments received during the public
meeting (so long as those comments do not raise new issues or information not
contained in the examiner's record) and the hearing examiner's written report. These
materials shall be reviewed for compliance with decisional criteria set forth in section 20-
126. The city council may receive new evidence or information not contained in the
record of hearing before the hearing examiner, but only if that evidence or information: (i)
relates to the validity of the hearing examiner's decision at the time it was made and the
party offering the new evidence did not know and was under no duty to discover or could
not reasonably have discovered the evidence until after the hearing examiner's decision;
or (ii) the hearing examiner improperly excluded or omitted the evidence from the record.
If the city council concludes, based on a challenge to the hearing examiner
recommendation or its own review of the recommendation, that the record compiled by
the hearing examiner is incomplete or not adequate to allow the city council to make a
decision on the application, the city council may by motion remand the matter to the
hearing examiner with the direction to reopen the hearing and provide supplementary
findings and/or conclusions on the matter or matters specified in the motion.
After considering the recommendation of the hearing examiner, the city council may
adopt or reject the hearing examiner's recommendations based on the record
established at the public hearing. If, after considering the matter at a public meeting, the
city council deems a change in the hearing examiner's recommendation approving or
disapproving the preliminary plat is necessary, the city council shall adopt its own
recommendations and approve or disapprove the preliminary plat.
As part of the final review, the city council may require or approve a minor modification
to the preliminary plat if:
(c)
(d)
The change will not have the effect of increasing the residential density of the
plat;
The change will not result in the relocation of any access point to an exterior
street from the plat;
The change will not result in any loss of open space or buffering provided in the
plat; and
The city determines that the change will not increase any adverse impacts or
undesirable effects of the project and that the change does not significantly alter
the project.
(a)
(b)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
REPORT TO THE
FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER
COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD
PRELIMINARY PLAT
File Number: 98-104394-00-SU
Related File Number: 98-104393-O0-SE
PUBLIC HEARING - AUGUST 28, 2001
2:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
FEDERAL WAY CITY HALL
33530 First Way South
253-661-4000
Report Prepared by
David Graves, AICP, Senior Planner
Madrona Planning & Development Services
206-297-2106
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECfION PAGE
I Recommendation
II General Information 2
III Consulted Departments and Agencies 3
IV State Enviromnental Policy Act 4
V Natural Environment 5
A. Stonnwater Runoff 5
B. Soils 5
C. Topography 5
D. Vegetation 6
E. Wildlife 7
F. Sensitive Areas 7
VI Neighborhood Characteristics 8
VII General Design 8
A. Subdivision Access & Roadway System 8
B. Pedestrian System 8
C. Landscape Buffers & Open Space 8
VIII Transportation 9
A. Street Improvements 9
B. Adequacy of Arterial Roads 9
IX Public Services 10
A. Schools 10
B. Open Space 11
C. Fire Protection 11
X Utilities Ii
A. Sewage Ðisposal 11
B. Water Supply 11
C. Drainage Facilities 12
XI Analysis of Decisional Criteria 12
XII Findings of Fact and Conclusion I3
XIII List ofExlùbits 15
I.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on review of this application, the environmental record, and pertinent decisional criteria,
the Department of Community Development Services recommends approval of the preliminary
plat subject to the following conditions:
I.
Stormwater conveyance, water quality, and detention facilities used to control stonnwater
runoff from the site shall be located in a stormwater tract dedicated to the City at the time of
final plat approval, unless located within improved public rights-of-way.
2.
All streets shall have a minimum pavement section of three inches Class B asphalt over
seven inches of crushed surfacing to support the traffic loads.
3.
Tract E, labeled as a Native Growth Protection Easement, shall be re-Iabeled as a Native
Growth Protection Area Tract. Provisions related to the preservation and enhancement of
native vegetation in this tract shall be included in the homeowner's association documents
and submitted to the City for review and approval prior to Final Plat approval.
4.
Consistent with the management recommendations of the Washington State Department of
Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), during preliminary plat construction, snag creation techniques
shall be used to provide and enhance habitat opportunities for Pileated woodpeckers within
buffer Tract "E" and appropriate portions of Lot 35. Within these areas large logs and
stumps shall be left on the ground. Dead and dying trees that are not hazardous to
surrounding properties shall be left in place, and healthy replacement trees of sufficient size
to replace existing snags when they fall must be left in place. Prior to the issuance of
construction penn its for the preliminary plat improvements, the applicant must submit a
management plan consistent with the WDFW recommendations indicating the proposed
measures to provide and enhance habitat opportunities for Pileated woodpeckers within
buffer Tract "E" and appropriate portions of Lot 35, to the City's Community Development
Services Department for review and approval.
5.
Clearing for the construction of the plat improvements, including roads, stonnwater
improvements, and utilities, shall be generally consistent with the clearing limits depicted
on the April 27, 2001, Site Grading Plan that was prepared by Touma Engineers as part of
the preliminary plat application materials. The clearing limits referenced above are the
approximate clearing limits necessary for road, stonnwater improvements, and utility
grading, and may be modified with the approval of the Community Development Services
and Public Works Departments during final engineering review as required to reflect
changes in road, storm water improvements, and utility designs, if any. The remaining
clearing beyond these limits necessary for development of the residential lots shall not be
perfonned until such time as approved pennits are issued for development of the residential
lots.
6.
Clearing and grading activities shall be restricted during the wet season, October 1" to April
30'h. No clearing and or grading activities shall occur during this period unless previously
approved iñ writing by the Public Works Director.
98-104394~O-SU
Page I
Cotlages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
II.
GENERAL INFORMATION
File No:
Applicant:
Agent:
Owner:
Action
Requested:
98-104394-00-SU
Rick Williams
19904 Des Moines Memorial Drive
Seattle, WA 98148
Michael Davis
Davis Consulting, Inc.
27013 Pacific Highway South, PMB No. 353
Des Moines, WA 98198
Phone: 253-859-37503
Rick Williams
19904 Des Moines Memorial Drive
Seattle, WA 98148
Preliminary plat approval of a 40 lot single-family residential subdivision as
provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions,"
and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Section 20-110.
A. Description of the Proposal
The applicant proposes to subdivide approximately 16.4 acres into 40 single-family
residential lots each having a minimum area of 7,200 square feet (Exhibit A). The proposal
includes construction of a road system, utilities, stonnwater facilities, street frontage
improvements, and other related infrastructure to serve the proposed residential lots. The
property has frontage along Hoyt Road SW, a public right-of-way, and vehicular access will
be provided from Hoyt Road SW. The property is undeveloped and vacant.
B. Location
The subject property is located in the City of Federal Way, on the east side of Hoyt Road
SW, in the 33300 block (Exhibit B).
C. Legal Description
The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 21 North, Range 3
East, W.M. in King County, Washington, including those portions ofF.B. Hoyt Road No.
1057 vacated under volume 70 of Commissioner's records, page 55; except that portion of
said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying within High Point Division 1,
according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 110 of Plats, pages 7 and 8, records of
King CountY, Washington; and except that portion lying west of the east line of 47'" Avenue
SW.
98-104394-00-80
Page 2
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
III.
D.
Size of Property
The subject site has a land area of approximately 16.4 acres.
E.
Land Use and Zoning
Site RS-7.2' Single Family - High Density Vacant
North RS-7.2 Single Family - High Density Single Family Residential
(SFR)
South RS-9.6 Single Family - High Density SFR
East RS-7.2 Single Family - High Density SFR
West RS-7.2,9.6 Single Family - High Density & SFR& Vacant
& 15.0 Medium Density
F.
Background
The application for the Cottages at Hoyt Road preliminary plat was originally submitted as
a 59-lot cluster subdivision in November 16, 1998, with a stonnwater outfall to Joe's Creek.
In 2000, the project was redesigned as a 40-lot "traditional" plat with stonnwater detained
and treated on site in an open pond and discharged to the City's conveyance system. The
applicant is proposing to pay a fee in lieu of providing open space on the site.
CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application.
A.
Community Development Review Committee (CDRC), consisting of the Federal Way
Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works
Engineering and Traffic Divisions; Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department;
Federal Way Department of Public Safety (police); Federal Way Fire Department;
Lakehaven Utility District; and Federal Way Public Schools. CDRC comments have been
incorporated into this report where applicable. The Washington State Department ofFish
and Wildlife (WDFW) was also consulted with regarding the presence ofPileated
woodpeckers on the site because their presence on the site has been documented.
B.
All property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site were mailed a notice of the
application and a notice of the August 28, 2001, public hearing. The site and the City's
official notice boards were posted, and notice was published in the newspaper. No public
comment letters were received regarding the notice of application.
C.
In accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) and FWCC Chapter 18,
"Environmental Protection," all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site,
and all affected agencies, were notified of the proposed action and the City's environmental
detennination. In addition, the site and the City's official notice boards were posted, and
I RS-7.2 ~ Single family residential, 7,200 SF minimum lot size.
98-104394-OO-SU
Page 3
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
notice was published in the newspaper. Seven comment letters (Exhibit C) were received
prior to the established deadline of June 11,200 I. No changes or corrections were made to
the City's initial environmental determination. No appeals were filed and the environmental
determination has become final.
IV.
ST ATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Acr
A.
A Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued for the
proposed action on May 26, 2001 (Exhibit D). This detennination was based on review of
infonnation in the project file, including the environmental checklist, resulting in the
conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the
environment provided the following measures are complied with:
I.
The applicant shall either construct the identified impacted Transportation
Improvement Plan (TIP) projects, as required by the Public Works Department,
prior to final plat approval; or,
The applicant may contribute $10,800, which is the project's pro-rata share of the
construction cost for the following impacted TIP projects, as required by the
Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of construction pennits:
TIP Project
South 320" Street at In Avenue South
South 320" Street: 8" Avenue South to SR99
Pro-rata Share
$5,300
$5,500
2.
Prior to final plat approval, subject to review and approval by the Public Works
Director, the applicant shall provide school-related pedestrian safety improvements
at SW 329" Street and Hoyt Road SW; specifically, advance warning signage,
advance warning flashing beacon, and approximately 75 feet of extruded curb
behind the eastern edge line on Hoyt Road to separate the walkway from vehicular
traffic, or pay an amount not to exceed $20,000 in lieu of the above improvements.
3.
Prior to Preliminary Plat approval, the applicant shall submit a landscape plan,
based on the following requirements, for review and approval by the Director of
the Department of Community Development Services, with concurrence by the
Public Works Director. The applicant must incorporate plantings into the design
of the stormwater detention pond and surrounding retaining walls, and the
proposed retaining walls to be located adjacent to the Hoyt Road right-of-way.
These plantings should be dense, bulky, and of large caliper to provide screening
upon installation. Plant materials chosen should be a mixture of trees and shrubs,
with a mixture of evergreen and deciduous species to provide seasonal color and
year-round greenery. Plantings must also be incorporated into the perimeter of the
detention pond and other disturbed areas of Tract A to provide additional
screening. Irrigation should be incorporated into the landscape plan to ensure
plant survival and used until the plants become established. Plantings shall be
installed as part of the preliminary plat improvements.
98-104394-00-80
Page 4
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
B.
Seven comment letters were received during the SErA MONS public comment period,
which ended on June 11,2001. These letters raised issues related to wildlife habitat, slope
stability, traffic impacts, and the loss of natural vegetation on the site. No appeals were
received prior to the established deadline of June 25,2001. No changes or corrections were
made to the City's initial environmental determination.
v.
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
A.
Stormwater Runoff
The applicant is required to provide storm drainage improvements designed in accordance
with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the City of
Federal Way addendum to the manual. An on-site stormwater collection and conveyance
system for all paved areas is proposed. Stormwater will be collected and then routed to the
on-site detention facility, to be located in the northwest comer of the site. Discharge from
the detention facility will be to the City's conveyance system located on the east side of
Hoyt Road, which discharges to Joe's Creek, approximately 250 yards to the north of the
site. A June 15,2000, Storm Drainage Report, prepared by Touma Engineers (with
revisions September 25, 2000, November 14,2000, and March 16,2001, and an April 4,
200 I, supplemental letter, Exhibit E) was submitted to the Department of Community
Development Services and reviewed by the Public Works Department. See Section X.C. of
this report for a detailed description of proposed storm drainage facilities.
B.
Soils
The soil classification for the majority of the site is Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 15-
30 percent slope (AgO), and the remaining area in the southerly portion ofthe site is
Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 6-15 percent slope (AgC), pursuant to the City of
Federal Way Soil Classifications map. These soils typically consist of a surficial zone (0-3
feet) of loose to medium-dense, weathered soils comprised of silty sand with gravel, and an
underlying layer of consolidated glacial till. Permeability of the upper layer is variable,
depending upon compaction. The lower layer is very slowly permeable. As indicated in the
applicant's Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study (Exhibit F), the potential for soil
erosion is identified as moderate to very severe, given the soil classification. Alderwood
soils are not included on the list of hydric soils prepared by the National Technical
Committee on Hydric Soils.
C. Topography
The site is rolling with a general slope from the east to the west downward towards Hoyt
Road. Elevation change from east to west is approximately 100 feet, the high point along
the east property line and the low area adjacent to the Hoyt Road right-of-way. Hoyt Road
also slopes downward from the south end of the property to the north. There is a small
ravine that 'runs east/west across the slope in the northerly portion of the site. The lowest
point of the site is the northwest comer. The majority of the site slopes range from 15 to 25
percent. There are several limited areas in the eastern portion of the site, and larger areas
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-1O4394-00-SU
Page 5
adjacent to the east/west ravine, that have slopes of 40 percent or greater. These large areas
associated with the ravine are classified as "steep slope hazard" areas. However, the smaller
slopes are not classified as a steep slope hazard area because the slopes do not have
sufficient vertical relief or horizontal distance to meet the definition contained within
FWCC Section 22-1.
The applicant estimates that approximately 56,500 cubic yards of material will be excavated
for the plat infrastructure construction, including roads, utilities, and the stonn drainage
facility. Excavated material will be used for fill on site, including 11,250 cubic yards for
road construction. Exported materials must be deposited at an approved site. The overall
site has significant topographic constraints that necessitate the proposed grading beyond the
preliminary plat improvements. The additional grading is required to stabilize the slopes
adjacent to the improvements, to minimize the erosion potential, and to maintain the
integrity of the site during both the infrastructure construction and individual home
construction. The amount of gràding proposed has been minimized to the extent practicable.
FWCC Section 20-179 states that, "...[a]1I natural vegetation shall be retained on the site to
be subdivided except that which will be removed for improvements or grading approved in
the preliminary subdivision or short subdivision." The applicant is proposing a clearing and
grading plan for those areas associated with the construction of public improvements and
for those areas beyond public improvements containing topographic constraints warranting
advance clearing and grading consistent with this code requirement (Exhibit G). Beyond
these infrastructure areas and areas with topographic constraints, clearing and grading will
occur only in conjunction with the construction of individual home sites.
Soil disturbing activities could result in the erosion and transportation of sediment,
particularly as indicated above based on the soil types and potential slope stability. The
applicant must submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESe) Plan for
review and approval of the Director of Public Works prior to any soil disturbing activities
(Exhibit H). Implementation of the TESC Plan with BMP's will prevent and/or minimize
erosion impacts during the construction phase of the project. Post construction erosion
potential will be minimized by applicant's proposed stonnwater drainage plan supported by
the submitted stonn drainage calculations, and stabilization of disturbed areas.
D. Vegetation
On site vegetation consists primarily of mixed second-growth forest with a dense under
story typical of the Pacific northwest lowlands and composed of Douglas fir, western red
cedar, western hemlock, big-leaf maple, red alder, salal, Indian plum, red elderbeny,
mountain ash, trailing blackbeny, beaked hazelnut, sword fern, fringe cup, columbia brome,
sweet vernal grass, bracken fern, and shield fern. All natural vegetation shall be retained on
the site except that which will be removed for improvements or grading as approved in the
preliminary plat (FWCC Section 20-179), and significant trees shall be retained or replaced
pursuant to Chapter 22, "Zoning." According to the Tree Retention Calculation submitted
as part of the preliminary plat application materials, and revised December 2000, and the
Tree Survëy (Exhibit I), there are 590 trees larger than 12 inches in diameter located outside
of the grading and clearing limits required for construction of the plat improvements. While
some of these trees are not considered "significant" under the FWCC due to their species,
Cottages at Hoyt Road Prelimirwy Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-IO4394-O0-SU
Page 6
their presence enhances the overall slope stability, wildlife habitat, erosion control, and
aesthetics of the site. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 20-\86 and 22-1568, significant trees
located outside of the grading and clearing limits required for construction of the plat
improvements shall be retained until building permits are issued for the single family lots.
Some ofthe trees located on the proposed lots will be removed during plat infrastructure
construction to preserve the slope stability, as outlined in the discussion under subsection
B.\ of this staff evaluation. After construction of the plat infrastructure, i.e. roads and
utilities, there will be approximately 392 total trees larger than 12 inches in diameter
remaining. Additional smaller diameter trees will also likely remain; however, the presence
of any trees smaller than 12 inches in diameter has not been documented since the site was
surveyed only for trees larger than or equal to 12 inches in diameter. The majority of the
trees to be retained are located on the easterly portion ofthe site. The westerly portion of
the site, adjacent to the Hoyt Road right-of-way, will have a greater number of trees
removed due to the presence of the proposed access roads and storm water detention facility.
Since greater than 25 percent of the significant trees located on the site will remain,
exclusive of those areas being cleared and graded for the construction of plat improvements,
no additional tree planting is required at this stage. As each individual lot develops,
proposed construction will be reviewed for consistency with the significant tree provisions
ofthe code (FWCC Section 22-1568).
E.
Wildlife
While the site will change from a 16.4 acre forested site to a 40 lot single-family residential
development, portions of the site will remain undisturbed and these areas will provide
habitat areas for urban wildlife. No evidence has been submitted which indicates there are
any state or federally listed, threatened, or otherwise protected animal species located on the
project site. Additionally, the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Priority Habitats &
Species Map does not indicate the presence of any priority habitats or species on or adjacent
to the subject site. The applicant submitted a July \9, 20ŒI, Wildlife Study, prepared by
Terra Associates, to the City in support of the preliminary plat application (Exhibit J). This
study concludes that the, "... [d]evelopment of this property will not impact any listed
species or habitats of concern." However, the study does indicate the presence ofPileated
woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus), a species designated by the Washington State
Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW) as a candidate for listing on the state's Priority
Habitat and Species List. As a candidate species, the WDFW has prepared management
recommendations for Pileated woodpeckers (Exhibit K). These management
recommendations related to trees, snags, and stumps should be incorporated into the
management ofthe buffer tracts and the undeveloped portion of Lot 35. Replacement of
significant trees, as well as incorporation of street trees, buffer open space, and infiltration
pond landscaping into the subdivision design, as proposed and as required, will help
mitigate the introduction of human activities on wildlife habitat.
F.
Sensitive Areas
The northerly portion of the site is identified as an Erosion Hazard Area on the City of
Federal Wäy Sensitive Areas map. This area corresponds to a portion of the site composed
of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgD) soils. The applicant's Preliminary Geotechnical
Engineering Study further indicated that, "...[w]e did not observe any indications of
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-1O4394-OO-SU
Page 7
significant active erosion in the portion ofthe site to be developed. However, localized
areas may be susceptible to erosion during site grading if exposed during extended periods
of wet weather. In our opinion, the existing site conditions do not present an erosion hazard
that can not be controlled by properly installed and maintained erosion and sedimentation-
control measures. Such measures early in the construction sequence will provide suitable
mitigation for the erosion hazard." Since the applicant's geotechnical engineer has indicated
that the on-site soils exhibit a moderate to very severe potential for erosion, Best
Management Practices (BMP's) will be required during construction.
VI.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS
The property is situated in the southwest portion of the City, in a single-family residential area.
All adjacent properties are either vacant or developed with single-family residences on lots
consistent with the zoning designation. The site is currently undeveloped.
VI.
GENERAL DESIGN
A.
Subdivision Access and Roadway System
Vehicular access to the proposed subdivision will be provided from Hoyt Road SW. The
internal roadway system is a loop with two points of access on Hoyt Road and short cul-de-
sacs at the north and south ends of the loop. Consistent with the requirements of the FWCC,
the applicant is proposing to dedicate a nine-foot wide strip of property adjacent to Hoyt
Road to the City of Federal Way, to increase the half street right-of-way width from 30 to
39 feet. Frontage improvements such as concrete curb and gutter, planter strip, sidewalk,
and street lighting will also be installed pursuant to the requirements of the code (FWCC
Section 20-180 & Chapter 22, Article XVI). The half street adjacent to the propèrty will be
constructed to the standards of Cross Section K as indicated in the City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan Planned Street Sections for Hoyt Road. Internal roads within the
proposed plat will also be public streets constructed to City standards with concrete curbs
and gutters, planter strips, sidewalks, and street lighting on both side of the street. The City
Public Works Department and the Fire Department have approved the subdivision access
and roadway system. See Section VIlLA. of this report for a detailed description of the
proposed street improvements.
B.
Pedestrian System
Sidewalks will be provided along all lot frontages within the proposed subdivision and
along the Hoyt Road frontage. Currently, there is no sidewalk along the east side of Hoyt
Road.
c.
Landscape Buffers and Open Space
In accordance with FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," landscaped buffers are specified
only when the plat is adjacent to "an incompatible zoning district or adjacent to an arterial
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-IO4394..oo-SU
Page 8
street. The proposed subdivision is bordered on all sides by single-family residential
zoning; therefore, no landscape buffers are required along these property lines. Since Hoyt
Road SW to the west of the site is an arterial street, a ten-foot Type III landscape buffer is
required along the site frontage pursuant to FWCC Section 20-178(a). The applicant has
proposed a 12-foot buffer, to be placed in a separate tract (Tract "D"). Tract D is 12 feet
wide; to accommodate the required ten foot wide strip of landscaping and a proposed
rookery. The rockery will be located along the easterly edge of the tract, away from Hoyt
Road, and the landscaping will be placed between the edge of the right-of-way and the
rockery to screen the rockery. An additional 15 to 50 foot wide tract is proposed around the
perimeter of the site within which the native vegetation wil: be preserved to provide a
buffer between adjacent residential developments. Additional landscaping will be provided
in the storm water detention facility tract, which will contribute to visual buffering (Exhibit
L). Street tree requirements are described in VIlLA; open space requirements are described
in XLB; and detention tract screening in X.C.; below.
VIII. TRANSPORTATION
A.
Street Improvements
In accordance with the FWCC, all street improvements must be dedicated to the City as
public right-of-way and improved to applicable street standards. Specifically, half-street
improvements on Hoyt Road SW, which will include 22 feet of pavement from the
centerline, vertical curb, gutter, streetlights, six-foot landscape strip with street trees, and an
eight-foot sidewalk, within a 78-foot right-of-way width.
Full street improvements are required for the internal roadway system, which will include
28 feet of pavement, vertical curb, gutters, streetlights, a four-foot landscape strip with
street trees, and a five-foot sidewalk on both sides of the roads.
The Public Works Department and Federal Way Fire Department have approved roadway
improvements, curve radii, and the cul-de-sac configuration, as proposed. Striping, signage,
and street lighting plans shall be submitted for review and approval of the City prior to
issuance of construction permits.
B.
Adequacy of Arterial Roads
This proposal has been reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Based
on the FWCC and the Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS)
issued for the proposed action on May 26, 200 I, the additional traffic to be generated by
this development requires pro-rata share contributions for projects identified in the City's
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) impacted by the proposed subdivision.
The applicant shall be required either to:
a.
Construct the following impacted TIP project as required by the Public Works
Department, prior to building occupancy; or,
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-104394.()Q-SU
Page 9
b.
Contribute the project's pro-rata share of the construction cost of the following TIP
project prior to issuance of building penn its:
1. S 320 St I Ave.
S to SR99: Add
second LT lane EB
and WE
2. S320 St-8 AveS
to SR99-HOV
Lanes: Add HOV
lanes
TOTAL
11 trips
12,278 trips
0.09%
$6,191,000
$5,500
$10,800
As proposed and conditioned, the subdivision will adequately mitigate impacts to arterial
streets.
Ix.
PUBLIC SERVICES
A. Schools
As part of the City's review of the proposal, the preliminary plat application was refelTed to
the Federal Way School District for comments. Comments received included the following
infonnation. Green Gables Elementary, Lakota Junior High, and Decatur High Schools will
serve the proposed subdivision.
Federal Way School District has indicated that elementary school age students living in the
proposed development will walk to Green Gables via Hoyt Road since the access is to the
north, on the east side of Hoyt Road. There is culTently a crosswalk and an adult crossing
guard at the Hoyt Road SW and SW 329th Street intersection where students can cross Hoyt
Road. The sidewalk adjacent to the High Point Park subdivision (to the north) ends south of
SW 329th Street and students walk along the shoulder of Hoyt Road to SW 329th Street. To
provide a safe route for students to get from the proposed development to Green Gables,
additional warning signage of the presence of a school crossing and curbing to separate the
commonly used walkway from vehicle traffic along Hoyt Road have been required as a
traffic safety related mitigation measure under SEPA.
Federal Way School District has indicated that bus transportation will be provided to
Lakota Junior High and Decatur High Schools for students residing in this subdivision. The
bus stop for Lakota Junior High School is located on SW 349th Street at approximately 42"'
Place SW. The bus stop for Decatur High School is located at SW 326'" Street and Hoyt
Road SW. Access routes for those students who would reside in the proposed subdivision,
from the subdivision to the existing bus stops have been approved by the School District.
There may be bus stops within the proposed subdivision at some point in the future,
depending on student needs. Routine adjustments to bus stop locations are made by the
School District based on student transportation needs and school bus routes.
CoItBges at Hoyt Road Prcliminaty Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-104394-00-SU
Page 10
School impact fees, as authorized by City ordinance and collected at the time of building
permit issuance, are currently $2,710.00 per single-family housing unit. Fees for 2002 will
be $2,616.00. School impact fees are determined on the basis of the district's Capital
Facilities Plan and are subject to annual adjustment and update.
B.
Open Space
Both Dash Point State Park and Dumas Bay Park are located less than 1.5 miles from the
site, and Olympic View Park is within Y, mile of the project site. These areas provide
opportunities for informal recreation.
To provide adequate recreational opportunities commensurate with new residential
development, FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," requires dedication of land on site for
open space, or a fee-in-lieu-ofpayment. Specifically, FWCC Section 20-155(b) requires all
residential subdivisions to provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land
area of the subdivision site; or pay a fee in-lieu-of payment for all or portions of the open
space area required.
Total open space required for this plat is 2.46 acres (15 percent of the 16.4 acre site). As
provided by FWCC Section 20-155, the applicant is proposing to pay a fee in-lieu of
providing on-site open space, by a November 22, 2000, letter (Exhibit M). The Federal Way
Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department has reviewed and accepted the
applicant's proposal to pay a fee in-lieu of providing on-site open space. The fee in-lieu
payment, to be calculated paid prior to final plat approval, will be utilized within the
designated planning area for park and recreation facility development.
c.
Fire Protection
Tacoma Water has indicated that water will be available to the site in sufficient quantity to
satisfy fire flow standards for the proposed development. The Fire Department requires that
a fire hydrant be located within 350 feet of each lot. The exact location of these hydrants
must be approved by the Fire Department before construction approval is issued.
x.
UTILITIES
A.
Sewage Disposal
The applicant proposes to serve the proposed plat by a public sewer system managed by the
Lakehaven Utility District. A November 11,2000, Certificate of Sewer Availability (Exhibit
N) indicates the district's capacity to serve the proposed development through a Developer
Extension Agreement (DEA) between the applicant and the district.
ß.
Water Supply
The applicant proposes to serve the subdivision with a public water supply and distribution
system managed by Tacoma Water. A November 11,2000, Certificate of Water Availability
(Exhibit 0) indicates the Tacoma Water's capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. The
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-10439~SU
Pagett
applicant will need to coordinate with Tacoma Water to design and install the necessary
improvements consistent with the requirements of Tacoma Public Utilities and the Federal
Way Fire Department.
C. Drainage Facilities
The site is located in the Lower Puget Sound Basin. As previously stated, stonn drainage
facilities are required to be designed in accordance with the KCSWDM and the City's
addendum to the manual. An on-site stonnwater collection and conveyance system for all
paved areas is proposed. Stonnwater will then be routed to the on-site detention facility, to
be located in the northwest comer of the site. The detention facility and the tract in which it
is located will be landscaped to enhance the site. Discharge from the detention facility will
be to the City's conveyance system located on the east side of Hoyt Road, which discharges
to loe's Creek, approximately 250 yards to the north of the site.
Development of the site will create additional runoff from new impervious area. As with an
paved, developed areas, the site will contribute some pollutants to ground and surface
waters, as these will be washed off the site by stonnwater into the drainage system.
A Stonn Drainage Report and Downstream Analysis, with revisions and updates through
April 4, 2001, including onsite basin comparisons, off site analysis, and core and special
requirements under the KCSWDM, was prepared by Touma Engineers & Land Surveyors
and submitted as part of the application materials. The City's Public Works Department
reviewed and concurred with the conclusions of the report. The approved stonn drainage
facilities must be constructed per FWCC requirements, prior to final plat approval and
recording of the subdivision.
XI.
ANALYSIS OF HEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY PLAT DECISIONAL CRITERIA
The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types
of land use applications. Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," Section 20-110,
preliminary plat applications are submitted to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing. The
preliminary plat application and the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner are submitted to
the City Council for approval or disapproval.
Pursuant to FWCCSection 20-126(c), the Hearing Examiner may recommend approval of the
proposed preliminary plat only if the fonowing decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria
and staff responses are provided below.
1.
The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Staff Comment: The preliminary plat application is subject to the adopted Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), which designates the property as Single Family - High
Density. Tbe proposed land use, Single Family Residential, with 7,200 square foot
minimum lot size (RS-7.2), is consistent with density allowances and policies applicable to
this land use as established in the FWCP.
Colblges at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examine< Report
98-104394-00-SU
Page 12
2.
The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted
by reference from the comprehensive plan.
Staff Comment: The preliminary plat application is required to comply with the
provisions of the FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions";
Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable codes and regulations. Future development
of the residential subdivision will be required to comply with all applicable development
codes and regulations. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the
preliminary plat will comply with all provisions of the chapter.
3.
The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would penn it development of the site
consistent with the current Single Family High Density land use classification of the FWCP
and Comprehensive Plan Designations map. Proposed access and fire hydrant locations
shall meet all requirements of the Federal Way Fire Department. Future development of the
plat in accordance with applicable codes and regulations will ensure protection of the public
health, safety, and welfare.
4.
It is consistent with the design criteria listed in Section 20-2.
Staff Comment: The proposed preliminary plat would promote the purposes identified
in FWCC Section 20-2, and the standards and regulations therein, as identified in the
staff report, including effective use of land; provision of water, sewage, drainage, and
recreational areas; promotion of safe and convenient travel on streets; provision of
proper ingress and egress; and provision for the housing needs ofthe community. As
proposed and with conditions as recommended by city staff, the preliminary plat
application complies with all provisions of the chapter.
5.
It is consistent with the development standards listed in Sections 20-151 through 157, and 20-
158 through 187.
Staff Comment: Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of
FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions"; Chapter 22,
"Zoning"; and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations. As
proposed, and with conditions as recommended by city staff, the preliminary plat
application complies with all applicable statutes, codes, and regulations.
XI.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on an analysis of the proposed action, the environmental record, and related decisional
criteria, the Department of Community Development Services finds that:
I.
The proposed action is to subdivide a 16.4 acre parcel into 40 single family lots. Adjacent
land uses include single-family residential and vacant parcels. There are identified
environmentally sensitive areas on the site (Steep SlopelErosion Hazard areas).
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-104394-00-SU
Page 13
2.
Zoning for the site and adjacent parcels is RS- 7.2. The proposed residential subdivision and
density is consistent with existing adjacent land uses and zoning.
3.
A Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued for this proposed
action on May 26, 2001. Seven written comments, but no appeals, were received prior to the
established deadline of June 25, 2001. No changes or colTections were made to the City's
initial environmental detennination. The environmental detennination is incorporated by
reference as though set forth in full.
4.
Sewer facilities are available from the Lakehaven Utility District and water is available
from Tacoma Public Utilities!racoma Water. Both are adequate to serve the proposed
development. It is the applicant's responsibility to secure all necessary water and sewer
services from the utility provider.
5.
The site is located in the Lower Puget Sound drainage basin. Surface water facilities will be
designed in accordance with the KCSWDM and the City of Federal Way addendum.
6.
Public access will be provided from Hoyt Road SW, via two access points. The interior
loop, with two cul-de-sacs, provides vehicular access to all the proposed lots.
7.
Sidewalks will be provided along all lot frontages and along the east side of Hoyt Road SW.
The sidewalks within the proposed residential subdivision will connect to Hoyt Road, which
provides a connection to existing pedestrian facilities located to the north of the site. The
applicant has provided for safe pedestrian colTidors from the subject site to public school
facilities and bus stops.
8.
Hoyt Road SW is designated as an arterial street by the FWCP. Street improvements and
right-of-way widths consistent with applicable City standards are required for all internal
roadways and street frontages. Public right-of-way and the stonnwater detention tracts will
be dedicated to the City.
9.
A geotechnical report with addenda contains specific recommendations and conclusions for
the proposed development, including site preparation and grading of the subject site.
Supplemental geotechnical analysis and recommendations may be required by the Public
Works Director or Building Official, as allowed by the FWCC, during development of the
site in confonnance with FWCC Section 22-1286.
10. The submitted Wildlife Study indicates the presence ofPileated woodpeckers on the site.
Pileated woodpeckers are designated as a candidate species for the state's Priority Habitat
and Species List. Management recommendations issued by the WDFW regarding Pileated
woodpeckers shall be complied with during preliminary plat construction.
II. The subject site contains 590 trees larger than 12 inches in diameter located outside of the
grading and clearing limits required for construction of the plat improvements. While some
of these trees are not considered "significant" under the FWCC due to their species, their
presence enhances the overall slope stability, wildlife habitat, erosion control, and
aesthetics of the site. After construction of the plat infrastructure, i.e. roads and utilities,
there will be approximately 392 total trees larger than 12 inches in diameter remaining.
98-104394-00-SU
Page 14
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminaly Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
XII.
12. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, the applicant is proposing to pay a fee-in-lieu of
providing the required open space on-site.
13. The proposed preliminary plat is permitted by FWCC Chapter 20, "Subdivisions," and
Chapter 22, "Zoning."
14. The proposed subdivision and all attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the
FWCP; FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection"; Chapter 20, "Subdivisions";
Chapter 22, "Zoning"; and all other applicable codes and regulations. As proposed, and
recommended by staff, the preliminary plat is consistent with the FWCP and all applicable
codes and regulations.
15. Prior to final plat approval and recording, all required and approved improvements will be
constructed, or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Reduced Scale Preliminary Plat Map, April 27, 2001
Vicinity Map
Public Comment Letters Received During SEPA Comment Period
Mitigated Determination of Non significance (MDNS), issued May 26, 2001
Storm Drainage Report, prepared by Touma Engineers, June 15,2000, with revisions
of September 25, 2000, November 14,2000, and March 16,2001, and supplemental
letter of April 4, 2001 (Summary)
F. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, prepared by Terra Associates, November
9, 1998, with supplemental information, July 6, 1999, August 20, 1999, June 9, 2000,
and March 23, 2001 (Summary)
G. Grading Plan, Street Profiles and Site Cross-Sections, prepared by Touma Engineers,
April 27, 2001
Temp Erosion Plan, prepared by Touma Engineers, April 27, 200 I
Tree Survey, prepared by Touma Engineers, April 27, 2001
Wildlife Study, prepared by Terra Associates, July 19,2001
Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife Materials re Pileated Woodpeckers,
March 1998
L. Landscape Plan, prepared by David Evans & Associates, June 20, 200 I
M. Open Space, Fee-in-Lieu Request, November 22, 2000
N. King County Certificate of Sewer Availability from Lakehaven Utility District,
November 9, 2000
O. King County Certificate of Water Availability from Tacoma Public Utilitiesrracoma
Water, November 7, 2000
H.
I.
J.
K.
TRANsMI1TED TO TIlE PARTIES LlSlID HEREAFŒR:
I.
2.
3.
Federnl Way Heariñg Examiner
Applicant: Rick Williams
Agent: Mike Davis, Davis Consulting Inc.
"""""milD "6007
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat
Hearing Examiner Report
98-104394-OO-SU
Page 15
!:m~u~ ~
~~:~~!~~~ ~
~ ~ ms ~8 ~
~ ~ '" ~~
~ ~ ~ !I!
~ S
~~~~"~",..~
t;¡t;¡t;¡t;¡t;¡t;¡t;¡t;¡t;¡
~~~~~~~~~
I
..
~
,
!
"IGH PpiNT P~RK ON..J \ UNPLATTro
\, . i = "" . \,
,
a r:il--
ft I I
I !
'~
~â . ~
? Ii I~
~ *
1111 I õ
~ ~
. !e
:¡¡
!::1
Ii~~
lil~
111l¡
I:i~
",
I'~
II
I~ I u~ ¡: ~9~U.I;;I~1 ~
. ~ l' . § - ~8 §Nr "
~ ,:!:a~!, ,.~,t. ..
t1~-tl!i ~ ',,: >!
Hi in II t~.¡¡~'f'
~ 1 - ~~. I
~@I ~ III!: ! II "I !;¡"i ~~I~ I~q
,I~I lUlu f I t§ fi~f~ '¡II
Q..II§ I¡'n ~ ?I
~I" I t~ ., t I
q~llft ll~" ;t
g.~! . § , ,I ii~ J
~II¡ . . I~ II
;!~I i! II~
COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD
COlER SHEET 4: lJOUN()ARY SUR £)'
FOR RIa( ØfI.lJA ,(
¡if
I
,/
/-4' ~,:"::'
~
~
.~ I
-1-----
~
~
~
~
~
~
'"
~
(¡¡
:i
'"
~
~-
=::::'-«:;;:;=
III
~)
\\ "o~
\\
f'IICH P(JINT R~RK Dlv. _3
\\ ã! ::: """'" '"
UNPLA TTED
~
<)
:::f
~
;
i ,/ ""
><--~ .
. .
~ ISSI
~ SCALE 1"=50'
õ
~
~
~
~
:õ!:
£
¡ï!
¡;
------.
~
:õ!:
~
(,.
~
CI
:1
¡¡:
¡¡::
;:¡
~
"1
~
..
S
ij
~
~
i
-.
~6Ç \
Wt::DCnv.OOD
COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD
PR£1JUINARY PLAT
FOR RIa< ItIJJJAM
¡g~ -=:
:::::,'==----:;==
....
<W
f---,-L MS
L-.. ! / "{
'"
<0
'.
..
^~)
Vi:
009££
006E:£ I
"'
"-
'"
:E
=>
=
LL
r-
w
t"'J
><:
::t:
.....
to
.....
...,
to
0
'"
REC¿;\"Cl_' i3Y
COMMUNIT'I DEvE~G""i+: "EPARn.~m¡
j Ii ~I j ?~n:
June 11,2001
Kathy McClung
Director ofCommLinity Development Services
Dear Ms. McClung:
We are writing in protest to the proposed development of "Cottages at Hoyt
Road". Our property backs on the proposed development, and as your letter
states, there is a moderate to severe potential for soil erosion.
Our property is at the top of the slope, there is a possibility of damage to
ours, as well as all of our neighbors, property.
We also have a number oflarge fir and alder trees on our property, if the
greenbelt below is removed we will be forced to remove our trees because of
loss of protection of the other trees in the greenbelt in high wind conditions.
The cost of removing the trees will be forced upon us and decrease property
value, because our backyard is built around these trees.
When we fIrst purchased this home in 1988 we were assured that the woods
in back were a greenbelt, and not a property that would be built on. Further,
the added noise and visual impact will decrease both our sale price of the
property, and our ability to sale the property.
t"1
:x
::c
;
::¡
("J
We strongly urge that this proposed development be denied, or at the least
mitigating easements allowed along the east side of the proposed
development for the homes along 41st Ave SW.
We plan to consult with our attorney concerning possible litigation against the
city of Federal Way for any damages or loss of property value, and standard
ofliving.
Our reason for living in Federal Way, and for living in this vel)' neighborhood
is because of the greenbelt in back, which we vel)' much enjoy, and would
like to see remain intact.
Sincerely,
Robert & Colleen LaBounty-333 13 41st Ave SW, Federal Way 874-2877
~ 6-JI. d(
!/, ~ 4r~' ~ø~.
(/)yt, ~ ~ Ÿ1£- tt¡Zl ~.:., tfrL- ~
~~ð¡f " ~s¿¿),
CY'~ /(þ~, ð"cP'~r.þc/~~ ~~
~ '-~ ~ th ~ð-.~~ IjfrtJ p;~ ~.
ð .wv ~ æ.u .ø-¿.~ ì ~J~ /
~;; ~ ß"!õþ bo./ tMWuP I~j éVtL- ~ ~
~, /. N¿ø..~/-&7..,.~
~ luøk- Y-- ð wi'ff ~ ~ ~ ~ )C
~ JJ~ LY:~ --4;:V7d k- nÞ~/~ '
f/vö au- ~ %k v?, - ð i:5 AÁF ð
/Ilv^d- tP/kU tP/'v~.
~~ (St~~~1)
'3 yþ~'Õ 1tV'i!" kVIT$W
" RECEIVED BY "".,. ~~ 1J-./\1
!'/'IUlI! """" nC\!CI f'D"c\lT nCD<""""
"')~Ozð
JON 14 2001
.-,..."..""~,~.¡':';;:~V¡':DSY,,__,,,-.,--.:.
May 31,2001
JUi1 () I ZOO1
To Kathy McClung
Director of Community Development Services
33530 First Way S.
PO Box 9718
Federal Way, Wa 98063
~~ &;
~"\ ev~
p. L-L Ãb, <) t\ - lo'¿:¡.) 5Á
In reviewing the Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance sent to
me, and upon reading the Federal Way decision, I will have to comment
on my observances as a resident of this neighborhood. There is afamily
of Hawks that fly over my home and back again into the trees that are
there. 1 have seen them for several years from my home that is only yards
from there. How many left turn lanes at 32dh and 1st Ave S is going to
protect the environment where these birds live? Also had there been a
study on the birds on this report? I see none. Everything in this study, as
far as 1 can tell, is geared toward the environment of the people. I and my
neighbors oppose the development of Hoyt Road because of the family of
Hawks that do live there. Please do your research and find that they are a
vital part of where we live here in Federal Way and the impact this will
have.
R~pectfullY,
{ t¡cku I:¡ ~ ~
Cydne Gasca
4208 SW 331h Pl
Federal Way, Wa 98023
Vf ø - /ð43q:3 :;:E
RECEIVED BY
COMMUNI1Y DFVF!.()DI!"'!T DEPARTMENT
June 9,2001
'"I\;
/U¡i
David Graves
Contract Senior Planner
City of Federal Way
33530 I- Way South
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
/
Re: Mitigated Environmental Determination ofNonsignificance
Cottages at Hoyt Road
Dear Mr. Graves,
As residents ofthe City of Federal Way and property owners adjacent to the preliminary plat for the
Cottages at Hoyt Road, we'd like to take this opportunity to share some concerns with the lead agency
regarding the proposed project. We understand there's significant growth in the Puget Sound region and
that development ofthe subject property was inevitable. However, we are disappointed in the decision
that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
Having lived next to the subject property for several years, we can say without hesitation that the
development of the property will have an impact on the wildlife that presently considers the wooded
acreage home. Hames, owls, a red fox, a pair of woodpeckers, a coyote, possums, raccoons and numerous
birds have all been seen, some more &equently than others. We do not pretend to know ¡fthe animals that
live in these woods are considered endangered and therefore, protected. We consider this determination to
be the responsibility of the lead agency.
We were infonned that a buffer zone of'SO feet will be established along the east side of the subject
property. We were further infunned that a buffer zone of 'IS feet will be established along the south side
of the subject property. If the lead agency has any influence over the size of the buffer zone, we
respectfully request that the same buffer zone of '50 be established at the south end. Our homes are built
on fill and we have great concern that substantial clearing of timber will have a negative impact on the
stability of the soil in the area.
As owners of dogs, we are concerned that the clearing of subject property will be very disruptive and
unnerving to our pets, causing them to bark throughout the day. We are aware of noise ordinances and
would like to know what assurances we will be given that the wellàre of our pets will be taken into
consideration and that we will not be subject to any penalties due to any noise they may make.
Thank you for giving us any opportunity to voice our concerns.
Sincerely,
6.~ 4/~
Residents. City of Federal Way
}(d!u~L t2é?M
~ D.1LÚðKJ
".-
June 8, 2001
City of Federal Way, WA.
Re: File No. 98-104393-00-SE
Cottages at Hoyt Road
Attn: Kathy McClung--Director of Community Development Services
Dear Ms. McClung,
We have lived in our home at 33225 43rJ Ave. SW (a private road) directly below and on the
west side of Hoyt Road for 38 years. We also own land to the north of our home (undeveloped) and
behind our home through which Joe's.Creek runs.
This is the third or fourth attempt to build on the high slopes on the east side of Hoyt and
approximately 332nd Street SW. We have spoken our concerns about water run-off and landslides at
each hearing on the proposed developments.
We have experienced many problems in the past with the flooding of drainage ditches and
wash-outs from the east side of Hoyt Road and the developments to the southeast of us. Several of
our neighbors have been flooded out. The developers had solved part of the problem months later by
running a culvert directly under Hoyt Road into Joe's Creek. This flooded Joe's Creek with mud,
silt, and water onto neighbor's land and ours. We have for many years had to put up with additional
flooding problems from the developments on the southwest side of Hoyt Road, including
apartments, houses, and the golf course in Pierce County. Joe's Creek used to have salmon in it, but
no more. It should have the same protection as the Hylebos Creek.
Each time a hearing comes up, we hear the same thing about surface water run-off being we11
monitored. Since the last hearing before High Point Park II! was built, water run-off from across
Hoyt Road spi11ed over the drainage ditch onto Hoyt Road and down our driveway into our yard.
This was minor, however, to the water that continued down Hoyt Road on the east side into a culvert
at the side of St. Theresa Lane and carved out a ditch on the west side of Hoyt Road approximately
six feet deep and five feet wide, taking a large tree down with the water. It was like a dam breaking.
The development of High Point Park III which was fina11y approved and built lies directly
north of this new project, Cottages at Hoyt Road. We have noted that as the construction continued
on High Point Park III that drainage pipes were put under Hoyt Road to the west towards Joe's
Creek and the wetlands.
The property on which "Cottages" has been proposed has been proven highly unstable as to
soil conditions. Your M.E. Determination of Non-Significance statement on file No. 98-104393-00-
SE states "that the proposed action does not have probable significant adverse impact on the
environment". You also state on page 2 that the majority of the site slopes range from 15 to 25
percent.
Please refer to the previous studies on this very sensitive parcel of land. Please refer to the
Comprehensive and Plan for King County Supplement, particularly, Ordinance # 1683-relating to
steep slopes. Please note that under the paragraph headed Definition-page 2- Section 6.3. and page 5-
Section 6.6 under paragraph headed "Problems in regard to development of steep slopes."' Please
refer to the paragraph under item # 12- page 3 oCthe preliminary report to the Zoning and Sub-
division examiner, stating that more than 75% oCthe site contains hazardous erosion soils and steep
slopes over 40%.
Besides the flooding problems of Joe's Creek, etc. we are having terrible tmffic problems on
Hoyt Road because of the extension of Highway 18 to Northeast Tacoma. Hoyt Road is used as a
major arterial now for tmffic going between SW 320'h SI. and SW 336111 St. to and from NE Tacoma
and the Tide Flats. There are many times we have to wait up to 2 minutes to get out of our driveway
onto Hoyt Road because of the traffic. Your statements say approximately 383 average weekday
trips will be added to'Hoyt Road. We often now have to wait through 2 signals on Hoyt Road and
336'h Street to turn left towards Federal Way. Please consider our traffic problems.
At one time, although I cannot find the reference numbers, the land on which "Cottages" is
proposed was to have a pennanent buffer of from 100 to 200 feet along Hoyt Road. This was
decided at a previous hearing several years ago on this property. I see no reference to this buffer on
the M.E.D.ofN we received. [hope this buffer is still being considered.
We realize that times change and we can't be in the (country) anymore, but paving all of our
natural beauty in Federal Way, and running out all of the birds and animals in our sensitive area does
not seem right. We have seen blue heron and red-tailed hawks, which have several nests in the
proposed development area. We've also seen coyotes, raccoons etc. come from across the street into
our yard.
If this development cannot be stopped, we would like to request from the builder and owners
of this development and/or the city of Federal Way, a Protective Bond to insure that we do not
sustain any damage to our home and adjacent properties from this development.
Please consider this proposed development very carefully. We thank you for taking the time
to hear our concerns. Because of previous disappointments, our neighbors have said, "What's the
use?"
None of us have the finances to formally fight this development, but we hope you will
consider the fact that we have all worked hard to pay for our homes and land and we still have to live
here. Thank-you agai.n.
Robert and Lorraine Stiers
33225 43'd Ave SW
Federal Way, W A 98023
(253) 927-0634 ..
/~~ ¿; ~-p-~ .
~1-~{/. ß~
T :::~
~~
TACOMA WATER
3628 South 35th Street
Tacoma. Washington 98409-3192
TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES
L/ . .o']l , ..
{VtJ1?fI:"" 6' ¡.v- {>.<;;;
\.,.1#< '}. yZ'.
¿arch 3, 2000 @
R! ~,c " iE 'ì ~:":-
- ..."
'-!"""""-'
JL:H 0' ZOO:
-
Ms. Kathy McClung
Director of Community Development Services
City of Federal Way
POBox 9718
Federal Way WA 98063-9718
êo:rí"T~Il-"'::>
k~,
@>
~
-
Subject:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - 98-104393-00-SE
location:
East side of Hoyt Road SW in the 333000 Block in the Twin
lakes area of the City of Federal Way
Dear Ms. McClung:
We have reviewed the above subject and find that this project will require the installation of
water mains and hydrants.
The new mains will be designed by Tacoma Water at the expense of the developer and
installed by and at the expense of the developer.
New services will be installed by Tacoma Water after payment of the Service Construction
Charges-
New Meters will be installed by Tacoma Water after payment of the System Development
Charges-
If the roadways within the proposed plat will be private, Tacoma Water requires that the
OWners put the following dedication on the plat: .We dedicate to Tacoma City Water a
perpetual easement with a right of entry and continued access for the construction,
improvement, maintenance and repair of water mains and other appurtenances over, under,
and across the private roads shown on the face of this plat."
Sincerely,
bZ.,J.~
.'-- Special Projects Engineer
L
~ ¡PZ . 'V rAt\
... .. ..--..-.........'-..--..
- ~~_~e~nFewi~~J Ol:~~ ~6/~YO~ ,~~..Le_t~~r from Ci_ty of Federa
X-From_: Greg.Fewins@ci.federal-way.wa.us Thu Jun 21 13:51:39 2001
Return-Path: <Greg.Fewins@ci.federal-way.wa.us>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:52:30 -0700
From: "Greg Fewins" <Greg.Fewins@ci.federal-way.wa.us>
To: "Tina Piety" <Tina.Piety@ci.federal-way.wa.us>,
<James.Hall@PSS.Boeing.com>
Cc: <dgraves@madronaplanning.com>
Subject: RE: Letter from City of Federal Way
Tina is out of the office until next Tuesday and will follow up on that
portion of your email at that time. Also, I am forwarding your email to
David Graves, the planner assigned to process the Cottages subdivision
application, with the intent that David contact you to discuss your
questions. David will be in touch with you shortly.
»;> "Hall, James L" <James.Hall@PSS.Boeing.com> 06/20/01 04:13PM »>
I already have four copies of the letter, two were mailed to me and two to
occupant. My concern was, how this change was going to affect my property
since the bio-swale has moved, and the property adjacent to my property
appears to be for sale by Windermere, and if this was going to change the
easement? I want to contact the seller of the property next to mine to see
if he may be interested in my property also? Anyway I have a copy of the
Hoyt Road Cottages drawings and a plat plan from Federal Way, the Drawing
number appears to be: SE 14-21-03 (MAP 51), and my property has the number
1421039046 (33525 - 43rd Ave. S.W.). Anything you can tell me about what is
going on would be appreciated, and I would like to get another set of the
Hoyt Road Cottages plans. Thank you Tina and Greg!
Jim Hall
--un-Original Message-----
From: Tina Piety [mailto:Tina.Piety@ci.federal-way.wa.us]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:49 AM
To: james.l.hall@boeing.com
Subject: Letter from City of Federal Way
Hello Mr. Hall,
Attached is a letter from the City of Federal Way regarding your comments on
the Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Plat. If you would like a signed copy
of this letter, please call Administrative Assistant Sandy Lyle at
253-661-4116, or e-mail her at sandy.1yle@ci.federal-way.wa.us and provide
her with your address.
Thank you,
Tina Piety -
Administrative Assistant
Community Development Services
<!OOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD
<HTML><HEAD>
HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
_u.---...__....n_....--..
~~ti~ii_!~~~~aVici .Grã.v~~===~þona~-Planniñ~<d~~y'~s@ma~o~~;~~= - 1
G~eq ~ewins2 10:00 AM 6/4/~1 -, Re: Online Council Comment Fro
X-From_: Greg.Fewins@ci.federal-way.wa.us Mon Jun 4 09:59:50 2001
Return-Path: <Greg.Fewins@ci.federal-way.wa.us>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:00:37 -0700
From: "Greg Fewins" <Greg.Fewins@ci.federal-way.wa.us>
To: <james.l.hall@boeing.com>
Cc: "Kathy McClung" <Kathy.McClung@ci.federal-way.wa.us>,
"Patrick Briggs" <Patrick.Briggs@ci.federal-way.wa.us>,
<dgraves@madronaplanning.com>
Subject: Re: Online Council Comment From
Content-Disposition: inline
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by fourbarrel.nwlink.com
id f54Gxnm02951
The scope of this project has definitely changed since it's original
submittal. I am not clear where your property is located so cannot respond
to your specific questions. However please feel free to call or stop by
city hall to identify your property and discuss your questions.
Mailing lists are prepared and submitted to the city by applicants.
Typically these lists are developed using the current King County Assessor's
records. City code requires notice be provided to each property owner and
in some instances occupants located within 300 feet of the project. You may
be receiving multiple notices due to the Assessor's records, particularly if
you own multiple parcels or are a contract property purchaser.
Please contact me directly if you have any additional questions.
telephone number if 253-661-4108. My email address is
greg.fewins@ci.federal-way.wa.us.
My
»> "James L. Hall" <james.l.hall@boeing.com> 06/04/01 09:22AM »>
I am trying to get the e-mail address for Kathy McClung, David
Graves, and lor Greg Fewins, City of Federal Way. This is in
regard to the Cottages at Hoyt Road. It appears that the scope of
this development has changed considerably since I signed an
easement agreement with the city. It has changed from 59 lots
with a retention pond and bio-swale adjacent to my property, to
a 40 lot site with the retention pond and bio-swale at the
north west end of the development. The property adjacent to me
is now for sale??? I have received (4) copies of the "Mitigated
Environmental Determination of Non-significance". Two addressed
to James Hall, and two addressed to Occupant. What is going on?
-- ~- ~
Printed for David Graves - Madrona p~~n!-_n9"_~dq:'.av",~@ma~_~na.~:.
1
Description
of Proposal:
Proponent:
Location:
Lead Agency:
Contacts:
CITY HALL
33530 1st Way South
PO Box 9718
(253) 661-4000
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
MITIGATED ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINA nON OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
COTTAGES AT HOYT ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT
File No. 98-104393-00-SE
The applicant proposes to subdivide approximately 16.4 acres into 40 single family
residential lots. The proposal includes construction ofa road system, utilities,
stormwater facilities, street frontage improvements, and other related infrastructure to
serve the proposed residential lots. The property has frontage along Hoyt Road SW, a
public right-of-way, and vehicular access will be provided from Hoyt Road SW,
t"J
~
....
t:O
::¡
Rick Williams, Applicant
Mike Davis, Davis Consulting. Inc.. Agent
0
Thc subject property is located on the cast side of Hoyt Road SW in the 33300 Block,
in the Twin Lakes area of the City of Federal Way.
City of Federal Way
David Graves, Contract Scnior Planner, 206-297-2106
Greg Fewins, CDS Deputy Director, 253-661-4108
The responsible Official ofthe City 'Of Federal Way hereby makes the following decisions based upon
impacts identified in the environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), and other
municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive
authority under the Washington State Environmcntal Policy Act Rules (SEPA) pursuant to the Revised
Code of Washington (RCW) 43.2IC.060:
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposed action does not have probable
significant adverse impact on thc environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not
required under RCW 43.2IC.032(2)(c), only ¡fthe following conditions arc met. This decision was made
after review of a completed environmental checklist and other infonnation on file with the lead agency.
This infonnation is available to the public on request.
~
'.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I.
The applicant proposes to subdivide approximately 16.4 acres into 40 single-family residential lots.
The proposal includes construction of a road system, utilities, storm water facilities, street frontage
improvements, and other related infrastructure to serve the proposed residential lots.
2.
Vehicular access to the site will be provided from. Hoyt Road SW.
3.
The site is rolling with a general slope ¡i-om the east to the west downward towards Hoyt Road and
an elevation change from east to west of approximately 100 feet. The majority of the site slopes
range from 15 to 25 percent. There are several limited areas in the eastern portion of the site and
larger areas adjacent to the east-west ravine that have slopes of 40 percent or greater. These large
areas associated with the ravine arc classified as "steep slope hazard" areas. The soil classification
for the majority of the site is Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, (AgO & AgC). As indicated in the
applicant's Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, the potential for soil erosion is identified as
moderate to very severe, given the soil classification. The northerly portion of the site is identified as
an Erosion Hazard Area on the City of Federal Way Sensitive Areas Map. Since the applicant's
geotechnical engineer has indicated that the on-site soils exhibit a moderate to very severe potential
for erosion, Best Management Practices (8MP's) will be required during construction. The applicant
is proposing a clearing and grading plan for those areas associated with the construction of public
improvements and for those areas beyond public improvements containing topographic constraints
warranting advance clearing and grading consistent with this code requirement. Beyond these
infrastructure areas and areas with topographic constraints, clearing and grading will occur only in
conjunction with the construction of individual home sites. Soil disturbing activities could result in
the erosion and transpol1ation of sodimcm, pal1icularly as indicated based on the soil types, and
potential slope stability. The applicant must submit an Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation
Control (TESC) Plan for review and approval of the Director of Public Works prior to any soil
disturbing activities. Implementation of the TESC Plan with 8MP's will prevent and/or minimize
erosion impacts during the construction phase of the project. Post construction erosion potential will
be minimized by applicant's proposed storm water drainage system.
4.
The storm water detention pond will be located adjacent to the Hoyt Road right-of way at the
northwest corner of the site. Due to the site topography and the size and depth of the pond, concrete
retaining walls will be required on the uphill (west) side of the pond. These walls will be tiered and
each will be approximately eight feet high, separated by a five foot area to be landscaped, and
visible from Hoyt Road. Retaiíling walls are also proposed in other areas of the site adjacent to the
Hoyt Road right-of-way but separated from the sidewalk by an area for landscaping. In order to
mitigate the potential adverse visual and aesthetic impacts resulting from these walls, plantings
l11ust be incorporated into the area around and between the proposed retaining walls, the perimeter
of the detention pond and other disturbed areas of Tract A, and between the retaining walls located
in Tracts C & D.
5.
A September 5, 2000, Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) (with supplemental information provided
November 6, 2000) was prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. for the project to
identify tramc imp~cts and recommend mitigation measures associated with the development.
Single-family residential developments such as the current proposal generate 9.57 average weekday
trips per dwelling uni(/lol, slightly less than one AM peak hour trip per lot and one PM peak hour
trip per lot (ITE Manual, Sixth Ed., 1997). The 40-lot proposed preliminary pial, upon full build
Mitigated Dctcnninalion ofNonsignifican«
Cotlages at Hoyl Road Preliminary Plat
Page 2
98-IO4393-00-SE
/
out, will generate approximately 383 average weekday trips; 30 AM peak hour trips and 40 PM
peak hour trips. Traffic generated from the proposed development will impact two Transportation
Improvement Plan (TIP) projects with more than 10 PM peak hour trips. The project proponent will
be required to either construct the planned TIP projects, or provide pro-rata share contributions
toward the proposed improvements to mitigate traffic-generated impacts from the proposed
development.
6.
The City's Public Works Department reviewed and concurred with the conclusions of the TIA and
supplemental information. The traftìc impacts ideniified in the analysis will be appropriately
mitigated by the required mitigation measures. Additional property adjacent to the Hoyt Road right-
of-way will be dedicated to the City of Federal Way to increase the half street right-of-way width
from 30 to 39 feet (Federal Way City Code [FWCC] Section 20-176). Frontage improvements such
as concrete curb and gutter, planter strip, sidewalk, and street lighting will also be installed pursuant
to the requirements of the code (FWCC Section 20-180 & Chapter 22, Article XVI) and the half
street constructed to the standards of Cross Section K as indicated in the City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan Planned Street Sections for Hoyt Road.
7.
Elementary school age students living in the proposed development will walk to Green Gables via
Hoyt Road since the access is to the north, on the west side of Hoyt Road. There is currently a
crosswalk and an adult crossing guard at the Hoyt Road SW and SW 329" Street intersection where
students can cross Hoyt Road. The sidewalk adjacent to the High Point Park subdivision (to the
north) ends south ofSW 329'" Street and students walk along the shoulder of Hoyt Road to SW
329" Street. To provide a safe route for students to get from the proposed development to Green
Gables, additional warning signage of the presence of a school crossing and curbing to separate the
commonly used walkway from vehicle traffic along Hoyt Road are required. These measures are
necessary to mitigate potential adverse safety impacts.
8.
The "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, File No. 98-1O4393-00-SE," is hereby
incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The following components of the FWCP support the conditions for the development.
I.
Improve the appearance andfunction of the built environment. (LUGI)
2.
Provide a safe, efficient, convenient and economic street system with sufficient capacity to move
people, goods and services at an appropriate level of service. The City shall develop and adopt
policies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and preservation of new and existing
facilities, such as gravel and substandard streets. (TG2)
3.
Identify and implemell/ changes to the transportation system which reduce reliance on the single
occupant vehicle. Support state, regional, and local visions alld policies. (TP9)
4.
Establish a LOS standard based on pl{//lIIing methodology using vehicle miles trave/ed (VMT)
congested to measure- the Level of Service (LOS) citywide, and all operation methodology for
development ill/pact, mitigation corridors and intersections based on LOS = v/c less than or equal
to 0.9. (TPI6)
Mitigated Dctenuination of Nonsignificancc
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary Pial
Page 3
98-IO4393-OO-SE
~.
5.
Siruciure Ihe Cily's improvemenl program 10 slralegical/y place incremenls of public and privale
inveslmenllhal complemellllhe mllilimodal vision oflhe pIal/. This should include "malching"
improvemenls 10 sllpplemell/ Ihe efforls by olher agencies 10 provide HOV and Iransilfacilities
(TP32)
6.
Arlerial improvemell/s will he colISlrueled a/ollg key corridors 10 improve jlow alld encourage use
of Ihese more efjìcienl modes. (1'1'4 I )
7.
Ensure Ihal Cily facilities and amenities are ADA compalible. (1'1'51)
8.
Work 10 exlend Ihe exisling s)'slem of sidewalks, bikeways, and equeslrian ways inlhe Cily 10
provide access 10 public lransit, neighborhood and business cel1lers, parks, schools, public facilities
and olher recrealiollal anracliolls. (1'1'52)
9.
If allowed by applicable lall', del'dopmell/ inside alld oulside Ihe Cily should be required 10 provide
Iheir fare share of onsile and offsile improvemenls. (HP7)
CONDITIONS
1.
The applicant shall either construct the identified impacted Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
projects, as required by the Public Works Department, prior to final plat approval; or,
The applicant may contribute $10,800. which is the project's pro-rata share of the construction cost
for the following impacted TIP projects. as rcquired by the Public Works DepaJ1ment, prior to the
issuance of construction permits:
TIP Project Description Project Total PM Peak Pro-Rata TIP Project Mitigative
IlI1pact Hour Volume Share Cost Fee
S 320'" SI al I" Ave S /0 SR99: 14 trips 4,611 trips 0.30% $1,739,000 $5,200
Add left tum lanes
S 320'" SI: 8" Ave S - SR99: II trips 12,278 trips 0.09% $6,191,000 $5,600
Add HOV lanes
TOTAL . $10,800
2.
Prior to final plat approval, subject to review and approval by the Public Works Director, the
applicant shall provide school-related pedestrian safety improvements at SW 329" Street and Hoyt
Road SW; specifically, advance warning signage, advance warning flashing beacon, and
approximately 75 feet of extruded curb behind the eastern edge line on Hoyt Road to separate the
walkway from vehicular traffic, or pay an amount not to exceed $20,000 ¡nlieu of the above
improvements.
3.
Prior to preliminary plat approval, the applicant shall submit a landscape plan, based on the
following requirelnents, for review and approval by the Director of the Department of Community
Development Services with concurrence by the Public Works Director. The applicant must
incorporate plantings into the design of the stormwater detention pond and surrounding retaining
Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificancc
Cottages at Hoyt Road Preliminary l'la!
Page 4
98-IO4393-Oü-SE
walls, and the proposed retaining walls to be located adjacent to the Hoyt Road right-of-way. These
plantings should be dense, bulky, and of large caliper to provide screening upon installation. Plant
materials chosen should be a mixture of trees and shrubs, with a mixture of evergreen and
deciduous species to provide seasonal color and year-round greenery. Plantings must also be
incorporated into the perimeter of the detention pond and other disturbed areas of Tract A to
provide additional screening. Irrigation should be incorporated into the landscape plan to ensure
plant survival and used until the plants become established. Plantings shall be installed as part of the
preliminary plat improvements.
This MDNS is issued under the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355. The lead agency
will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issuance, pending apublic comment period.
Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on June 11,2001.
Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline.
Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal with the city within 14 days of
the above comment deadline. Appeals must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on June 25, 2001.
Responsible Official: Kathy McClung
Positionrritle:
Address:
Director of Community Development Services
33530 first Way South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
Date Issued:
Mav26.2001 Sigu:lture:
K~~O
_10"'711
Mitigated Determination of Non sign ificancc
Co!tJIgcs at Hoyt Road Prelimina!)' Pial
Page S
98-IO4393-OO-SE
.~
- \ Iß\\fil-r-r"t'"r>'
RES I 1\,11! ¡ :":'1../
t 1."..,
,JUN : l ZlJU!
,..,:>,(J 7,13-0UJ-'!B1
t';!\',,;"Fedcr:!:Wayl'roject
I'REI'¡\IZED BY
t"-
~
...
~
...
...
TOUJ\I¡\ FNGINEERS
6632S0UTII 1915TI'LACE, SUlTEE-I02
KENT, \VA 98032
(425) 2')1-0665
t'
Junc 1),2000
IU,,\' I Scptcmbcr 2),2000
I\LV j!2 Junc 6, 2001
EXPIRES 6/221 03
TABLE OF CONTENTS
\.
PROJECT OVER VIEW
T.I.R.
Vicinity Map
Soil Map
[\.
PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY
Core and Spccial Requircmcnts and responses
-III.
OFF-SITE ANA!. YSiS
IV.
RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
V.
CONVEY ANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DES[GN - N/A
V\.
SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES
Eal1h Consultant Report Addcndum
V[\.
EROS[ON SEDIMENTATION CONTROL - N/A
1- PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposal will create 40 new houses. The total site area measured 16.4 acres. The
basin area is only 12.67 acres and it will be addressed because there is approximately
3.73 acres of the site situated with pr"posed lot 35 will by-pass the on-site storm system.
The site is bordered on the West by Hoyt Ro:ld S\\'. The Site is bordered on the North by
High Point Division 3 and S!.Theresa Church. It is bounded on the East by High Point
Division I and on the South it is bounded by Wedgewood Division 3. All adjacent
properties are single family developments. The property cover consists ofa forested
hillside with slopes ranging from 25% to 30%, sloping down from East to West. The soil
type is classified as Aldcrwood by the SCS.
An intermittent flxest swale exists in li¡c' Nonh portion of the site, and it is proposed to
keep majority of the arca in its n¡,tura! ~'ondition by allowing one large lot (Lot 35).
Majority of the lot 35 consisting 0":;."/.1 acres will by-pass the r¡n-site drainage facilities.
Native GroWth I'rotectivc Eascllle'" U<CìPE) is SCt aside along the cast, south and north
of the property as a buf1èr bctwcl'n Ihis developillent and surrounding single family
developments.
The surface watcr generated from "n:site devclopmenl (High Point Division No. I) is
directed into its own detcntion ¡'lciliIY located along the east and middle portion of this
development. We propose to connect thc out-fall ofth" High Point Division I detention
facility with the proposed storm conveyance system for this development. Provisions for
a splitter, to be situated at a point bel()rc it discharges into the new site detention facility,
to control offsite runoff from the easl. The spliUer will allow the off-site runoff to by-pass
the new detention facility for this development '.
/' II. PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY
CORE REQUIREMENTS:
I.
Core Requirement # I - Discharge althe natural location.
The runoff from the site will be directed via underground pipes and catch basins
to a combined detention pond! wet-vault facility. The detained runot1" will be
directed into existing storm system on the east side of Hoyt Road SW.
2.
Core Requirements #2 - Offsite Analysis.
See below.
3.
Core Requirements #3 - RunofTConlr.,1
A detention pond and bio-swale are proposed to allenuale the peakllOlv and
improve water quality. Because a project called Northshore Division II has
diverted! 00 acres away from the basin, the ßW-2 standard was deemed to
provide enough peak now protection. Thus th~ 2 and 10 year, 7 day storm peaks
were inãtched and the detention volume increased by 30%. See Preliminary
Detention Design below.
4.
Core Requirements #4 - Conveyance System.
The conveyance system shall consist of underground pipes and catch basins.
s.
Core Requirements #5 - Erosion! Sedimentation Control Plan.
We propose a silt-fence and a sediment trap 10 contain sediments on site.
/
/
/ CO'E 'EQUI'EM ENT #2 - OFF-SITE ANA LYSIS
I UPSTREAM
All upstream drainage comes from the devel°pl11ent (High Point Park Division I)
to the east of the site. The existing storm drain system of this development will
be connected to the proposed system of the site. A splitter is being considered to
allow the off-site runoff to by-pass the proposed detention facility. There will be
no off-site runoff contributing to the site.
2.
Dt )WNSTIŒAM
From the proposed detention facility the discharge will be conveyed west and
north to existing story system situaled along the east site of Hoyt Road SW. The
flow is directed through 18-inch culvert approximately 210 feet to a cross culvert
(l8-inch diameter) which direct the flow to the west of Hoyt Road following
natural swale until it reaches Joe's Creek. Here Joe's Creck is 4' wide, grass
lined, flowing North. The creek flows North for more than ";' mile. The creek
meanders moderately and has a rather flat slope
Another 1700 ft. tilrther the creekcomes to a 36" CMP culvel1under 329'10 PI.
SW. At the inlet is a wetland with standing IVater, about 100 It. wide; the creek is
4 ft. wide with rock armored-bed and trees along the banks. The culvert has a
maximum headwater of8 n. At the outlet the creek becomes earth lined with
trees and bushes on the hanks. From there 100 It. downstream is a 48" CMp
culvert under a driveway, with a 4.5 It. maximum IIW. The creek continues
North for 600 ft. where it crosses under Hoyt Road through a long, 48" CMp that
discharges to the first lake of "Twin Lakes" Subsequently the storm water flows
East 70 ft. from the first lake to the second lake. The NE end of the second lake is
approximately I mile downstream of the sile.
From there the water is conveyed NE. through a .ie,' concrete pipe to a 200 ft.
reach along a golf course. Then follows a 50 Il. pond with a 4 Il. by I It. overflow
grate to a 36" CMp. The latter pipe crosses under 320'" St., below the pedestrian
underpass, to a storm drain manhole at the other side of the pedestrian tunnel.
Another pipe leads to a second manhole at the driving range from where a 3'" pipe
takes the flow North to the lower reach or Joe's Creek. Here the creek is flanked
by dense bushes and trees. Gradually the IVater course turns into a canyon about
100 ft. deep below the Dashpoint Road 45t)() Ii lilrther d,'wnstream
EXPECŒD IMPACTS TO JOE'S CREEK
I. ErosiO/1
The upper reach of the creek is fairly nal, meanders. and is densely vegetated along 1110st
of the first 3000 ft. thereby resisting erosion. The runolfpeak nows li'om the proposed
development will be attenuated by the detention pond to pre-developed peak flows up to
the 10 year event, Therefore, erosion probably will not worsen during lesser storms
printouts below,
Outflow frol11 a regular detention pond, equal 10 and below the 2 year detained peakflow
will occur more frequently. The 2-ycar-detaincd peakl1mv is 0,94 cis, We predict a
flow velocity of 0.9 fps, This usually does not constitute an erosion hazard, As
mentioned above, 100 acres were recently diverted away li'OIll the creek basin: therefore,
the increase in duration of flows equal to our 2 year "eaUlo\\' will not cause any erosion
for the creek, which used to handle larger flow volumes See calculation helow.
2. N(}(}di/1~
,We did not see any signs of past flooding, Up to the I a-year storm no flooding is
expected because those peak flows are attenuated by means of detention
3, WaleI' Quality
RunofffTom the developed site will be picked up and conveyed to a bio-swale.. Then
the runoff is filtered by grasses in the bioswale: and, to a lesser degree, even soluble
pollutants are absorbed by plants. The runoff from road, sidewalks, grass and roofs
doesn't have a high concentration of pollutants, so that the proposed water quality
treatment will suffice to maintain the existing water quality in the creek.
.~--'
TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc.
Cun,ult"n" in Ceolechnical Engineering, Geology
and
[nvironl11ental Earth Scicnces
March 23, 2001
Project No. T-3895-1
Mr. Mike Davis
Davis Consulting
27013 Pacific Highway South, P13M No. 353
Des Moines, Washington 98198
Subject:
Respol1Sz to Comments
City of Federal Way Leller
Cottages at 110)1 Road
Fcderal Way, Washll1glOl1
Reference:
I. Letter from City of Federalll'ay, February 16,200 I
2. Prelimina!)' Geotcehnieal Report, by Tcl1'3 Associates, Inc., dated November 9, 1998
3. Geotcchnical Report Addendum, by TelTa Associates, Inc., dated July 6, 1999
t"J
~
::c
6;
::¡
4. Supplementary Exploration by T "ITa Associates, Inc., dated June 9, 2000
Dear Mr. Davis:
~
As requested, we have revicwed the February 16, 200 I letter from the City of Federal Way regarding proposed
grading and SEPA comments on the Hoyt Road project. We prcviously prepared a series of geotechnical reports
and letters on the project, as rcfercnced abol'e.
Subsequent to the issuance of the City's kller. Toull1a Engineers has recently updated their grading and TESC
plans for the project. We have reviewed th"sc rel'iscd plans, dated March 20, 2001, and are providing our
comments relating to City of rede.a! W"y .e.',o.',' of ¡he projcct at this preliminary SEP A phase. Our commer.ts
are provided below: .
Citv Letter Item No. I
Touma Engineers has revised the gr"ding plan. as requested by the City, to limit grading as much as possible to
that needed for roadways. Graded arcas are generally limited to 2:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) slopes and occasional
3:1 slopes, as necessary, to reduec disturbancc to vegetation on the site.
Based on our review of the rcviscd grading plan, it is our opinion that the plan is in general confonnanc~ with our
recommendations for site grading and earthwork construction.
12525 Willows Road. Suite 101, Kirkland. Washinnron qRO~4
Mr. Mike Da\'is
March 23, 2001
Clt\' Letter Item Ì'\o. 2
As requested by thc City, Toull1a Engincers has prcparcd a conceptual temporary erosion and sedimentation
control (TESC) plan for the projcct, datcd March 20, 200 I. This TESC plan appears to be in general conformance
with thc standard of practice used in thc Pugd'Sound arca fox crosion control. Terra Associates, Inc, will also be
on-site during grading activitics 10 proYidc rceoll1nk'ndations for any additional erosion control or monitoring
measures that may be required. depending on thetimc of year and the site conditions at the time of grading.
Citv Letter Item Ì'\o. 4
We understand that the City of Fcderal Way and their consultant has recommended the use of ASTM Test
Designation D-1557 (Modified Proctor) for compaction testing of structural fills. Terra Associates, Inc.
previously recommended of use of ASTM Tcst Dcsignation 0-698 (Standard Proctor) for this purpose. In our
opinion, this is an appropriate standard fr,,- u.,~ since n is uscd by most public agencies, including the Washington
State Department of Transpc)rtation (\\'SI)(H). lIo\\'e\w, as requested by the City of Federal Way, we will use
the ASTM Test Designation D-1557 stand:!rd during structural fill testing on this project.
Summar\'
Based on our review, it is our opinion that thc rc\'ised plans prepared by Touma Engineers are in general
conformance with our recommendations and the City's request. At the time of final engineering and design, Terra
Associates, Inc. will provide additional input and recommendations, as needed,
In previous reports and discussions, we have recommended that grading on lots and roadways be perfonned
concurrently so that the completed lots are at a potcntial fmal grade for individual builders of residences. This
would reduce the potential for problems typical1y created by grading on individual lots, while trying to coordinate
grades on adjacent lots that may be built at different times by different builders. This can result in uneven cuts
and fills, wal1s, and rockerics on individual lots in a haphazard manner. Since this is a significant issue, we
recommend detailed geotechnical rcvie\\' of al1 grading and foundation construction on individual lots. The
purpose of this review is to minimize thc potential adverse impacts on adjacent lots or on the overall site due to
construction on an individual lot. Thesc rc\'ic\\'s should be pcrfonned prior to starting any construction on the lots
and should be supplemented by obser\'atio):1s during construction to verify that the recommendations are
incorporated into construction,
We trust this letler has providcd an adequate response to the City of Federal Way letter. If you have any
questi~~~ or require additional information. please call.
:;/;:':;/0/
Project No. T-3895-1
Page No.2
TERRA ASSOCIATES, I~E~:~~).,~,:,:TfTED
SEP 2. 6 2000
Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology
and
Environmental Earth Sciences
June 9. 2000
Project No. T-3895-1
Mr. Mike Davis
Davis Consulting Group
900 Meridian Avenue East, Suite 19-313
Milton, Washington 98354
Subject:
Supplementary Exploration
Collages at Hoyt Road
Hoyt Road SW and SW 334th Street
Federal Way, Washington
Reference:
I. Preliminary Geotechnical Report. Cottages at Hoyt Road, dated November 9, 1998,
prepared by Terra Associates, Inc.
2. Geotechnical Report Addendum, Cottages at Hoyt Road, dated July 6, 1999,
prepared by Terra Associates, Inc.
Dear Mr. Davis:
As requested, we have completed supplementary subsutface exploration at the subject project site. We previously
conducted a geotechnical study for the project and presented our findings in -the referenced reports. Since that
time, the grading plan has changed. We conducted additional subsurface exploration in the areas of significant
cuts that were not part of the original grading plan. This report summarizes the results of our recent subsurface
exploration and discusses the applicability of the recommendations presented in the referenced reports.
PROJEcr DESCRIPTION
The project will consist of constructing two-story residences and associated facilities. At the time of our study,
the actual building locations and their struqural loads were not known. We expect that perimeter load-bearing.
walls and isolated spread footing loads will bc as indicated in the referenced reports. Perimeter bearing wall loads
will be approximately I to 2 kips per lineal foot and isolated spread footings may carry loads of up to
approximately 30 kips.
SUBSURFACE COl\'DITIONS
We drilled four soil tcst borings (3-1 through 3-4) and excavated 14 test pits erp-l through TP14) ~ part of our
previous studies for this project. Our current exploration included drilling two additional test borings (B-5 and B-
6) on May 25, 2000.
12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washin~ton 98034
Mr. Mike Davis
June 9, 2000
"
The borings were drilled in the northern and south-central parts of the site, where significant excavations wiII be
required to create roadway access 10 the project and lots. These test borings were advanced to a depth of
approximately 31.5 feet below the ground surface. The approximate locations of the test borings are shown on
Figure 1 and the boring logs are shown on Figures 2 and 3. We performed grain size analyses on six
representative soil samples obtained from the test borings. The test results are presented on Figures 4 through 6.
The test borings encountered 9 to 12 inches of topsoil overlying very loose to medium dense silty sand.
Underlying the upper silty sand soils, we observed dense to very dense, poorly-graded sand with silt from depths
of 4 to 27 feet. Clean sands were encountered below 23 feet to the maximum exploration depths. We did not
observe groundwater seepage or associated wet soils in the test borings drilled at the site.
DISCUSSION
Our subsurface exploration indicates that the location of the significant cut areas are underlain by silty sands to
clean sands. . These soils are consistent with those noted in Our previous test borings. Therefore, the
recommendations contained in the referenced reports continue to be applicable and should be used for design and
construction of the Collages at Hoyt Road.
Excavations for project construction will require cuts of approximately up to 25 feet below the existing grades.
All excavations at the site must be completed in accordance with local, state, or federal requirements. All
permanent cut and fill slopes should be graded to a finished inclination of no greater than 2:1
(Horizontal:Vertical). All finished slopes should be planted with suitable species of vegetation to minimize future
erosion potential. All recommendations presented in our earlier reports should also be incorporated into project
design and construction.
If you have any questions or require additional
Encl:
TAlAB:dvp ..-..,
I EXFIRE5 1219/01 -- . j
Figure 1- Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Exploration Location Plan
Figures 3 and 4 - Boring Logs
Figures 5 through 7 - Grain Size All3lyses
Project No. T-3895-1
Page No.2
/'
./
TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc.
Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology
and
Environmental Earth Sciences
August 20, 1999
Project No. T-3895-1
Mr. Mike Davis
Davis Consulting Group, LLC
900 Meridian Avenue East, #19 - PMI3 3 ì3
Milton, Wasrungton 98354
Subject:
Geotechnical Issues
Proposed Site Grading
Villages at Hoyt Road
Federal Way, Washington
Dear Mr. Davis:
A5 requested, we arc providing geotechnical services relating to the design and construction of the subject project.
To date, we have conducted subsurface exploration at the site in two phases. .Our findings and recommendationS
for the geotechnical aspects of the project have been presented in our reports dated November 9, 1998 and Jllly 6,
1999. In perfonning our work, we have also reviewed grading plans for the project prepared by Towna
Engineers. The most recent grading plans, dated June 1999, show cuts and fills on the order of 15 to 20 feet to
create fuúsh grades for roadways, building lots, and the detention pond. The site has considerable natural relief
and the planned site grading is necessary to provide stable slopes, as well as easily accessible roadways.
Recently, based on correspondence and communication with representatives of the City of Federal Way, it is our
understanding that the City has requested modification of the proposed site development plans to incor:porate
grading and construction of roadways and utilities only. The City also indicated that grading on individual lots be
conducted later during development on individual lots. It is also our understanding that the purpose of this
request by the City was to maintain the maximum amount of vegetation on the site, as well as to minimize initial
grading impacts on the property.
It is certainly feasible to perfonn site grading on the project in two phases as requested by the City. How~«;t;-i;
our opinion, the benefits of the phased grading will be far outweighed by potential adverse impacts.
12SJS Will",v< 1;>"...1 <:..;'n "H 1(:,1,",,;'.1 """,:_-,-- no"..
Mr. Mike Davis
August 20,1999
You requested that we evaluate the benefits of performing the site grading for the project in this manner. Based
on our review, our comments are presented below.
I. The City has suggested tree remol'al be initially confined to roadway and utility areas oilly. Removal of
vegetation is recommended during development of the individual lots. While reducing vegetation
removal on the site is a good idea to reduce crosion potential, all of the trees that might be saved during
the initial phase will be remol'ed in laler phascs during construction. Delaying the removal of the trees
will not serve the purposc of long-term erosion protection since 'these trees will be removed anyway. It
is our understanding that you plan to revegetate the site using new trees with a ratio of 1.5 new trees to I
tree removed from the site. In our opinion, mass grading of the site followed immediately by planting of
new trees at designated locations would prove to be a more suitable and effective manner to perfonn the
site grading and vegetate the site.
2. The City indicates that excal'ations and fills made incidental to construction of roadways and other
utilities may extend 20 feet from the edge of the roadway to adjacent lots and properties. Based on the
current grading plan, cuts and fills placed in this zone may need to be at inclinations of 1:1
(Horizontal:Vertical) or steeper. These arc not stable slopes for the soil conditions existing on the site.
Therefore, if the City's requirement is followed, then it will result in leaving several potentially unstable
slope areas on a portion of the property.
3. If grading is performed for the roadways only, extensive additional grading will be needed on individual
lots for house construction. l1'¡s grading may not be performed on individual lots concurrently.
Therefore, if lot grading is performed on scattered lots at a time, each lot will be considerably more
susceptible to erosion. In addition, if grading is to be performed on a lot which is adjacent to a lot that
already has a residence on it, the existing residence may be susceptible to loss of adequate lateral and
vertical support or excessive surcharge loads during site grading on adjoining lots.
4. If only the roadway alignment is del'eloped initially and individual lots developed later, the temporary
slopes adjacent to roadways will need to be pro,'ided with temporary retaining \valls, as well as erosion
protection. Whenever a new lot is developed adjacent to the roadway, this will result in severe
disruption of erosion controls and temporary slope protection measures provided for the slope and could
result in localized failures.
5. Current grading plans envision construction of retaining walls and/or rookeries to accommodate great
differences in individual lots and allow construction of house pads. If the site is graded at one time,
construction of these grade separation walls or other devices can be made concurrently with the site
grading. However, if this work is performed with individual lot development, the construction of such
devices on individual lots will be considerably more difficult. l11Ìs will be particularly true if a retaining
wall or rockery extends across two lots. Construction of the walls and/or rockeries in separate phases is
likely to result in structures that may not properly mateh each other and also may result in redoing the
portions of the structures that arc affected by adjacent construction.
Project No. 1'-3895-1
Page No.2
Mr. Mike Davis
August 20, 1999
6. If only the roadway areas arc graded initially, these will be subjected to very heavy construction earth-
moving equipment loads throughout the period that individual lots arc being graded. These loads may
result in damage to tile road subgrade.
7. Appropriate erosion and sedimemation controls can be madc effectively on the overall site perimeter and
exposed work areas as a whole if the site is graded.at one time.
In light of the above factors, it is our opinion that grading of the site can be conducted with less risk and far more
efficiently if it is performed in one phase. Of course, proper erosion and sedimentation control is a key element in
performing site grading at the site. All other recommendations presented in our earlier reports should be followed
in construction.
We trust the information presented in tI¡is kner is sufficient to enable you to address the City's concerns
pertaining to phasing of sitc grading at [lic subject site. If you have any questions or require additional
information pleasc-sa!l~""'¡'~';,...
, S".>~"t '¡.Hh"~",v
_.§.i.':.'l \., '. ,- .. -4 >(,.
Sincerely yo~i:4'Y' . éi' 1J!'Si~«.,\~.
TERRA A 0 . L ~ (":10\ '~',
, . \\ .1
. . ~3/.:lo/qq
Ani!. Butail, \.~""--~~~t~
PresIdent ',~ ~ ~(.>'
~'Or,AJ.,-f.""
AB:d""t-~,.,.
vp . - ..."
~~RE~ 12~OI.___..!
Project No. T-3895-1
Page No.3
EXHIBIT G
::!
:t:
-... -..-
---------
IYYf77 ( )C)RJ lJO.J
NY1d DNIO'tNS 3115
ayOH 1J..OH 1 V S39VJ.10:J
/I 10 OOO'M3Do:ltV¡
¡ \ \
~ =.r~
f'
697:11
~
Oq=.1 37V:JS ~
. ISSJ ~
.
C)
~
I
¡.:
(f¡
~
I<)
~
~
~
~
(!¡
~
¡;¡
!!.,
~.
E
.
~ B q I
~ d I I
III~~~.
"!.
~
!::
~
/,
l
.
'«'POí:I
031.1 V7dNn
i Q
/1/0 \~Vd ~'¡v.IO~ J:ldIH-
f'
==~-=--=
IYY177IH )C)QJ IJO.:J
S37tK»Jd (}I(OH
OVOH 1.).OH 1 V S3ÐVllCXJ
~=:~
I
,
I
N'
UN \
I
I
" .
~, ~
~: I
- I
1- ..
I
-
N
-.~ I
"'-
~I
""-
""-I
,-
'~I
""'-
-I
""'-
""'-I
""'-
~I
,,"'-
. .
,
~¡
¡&
'I
þ
~ ~ ~
C> C>
~ ~
I
~~
"
--
1M. b' I I I
..
:¡:~
I
1"/ ~
a:
~ ~ ~
Q
C§
Q::
t
a '¡
::t::!
~ Ii
(r¡ II
~ ~
I
s
I-
I
.Ii ' .....
. ILn
¡i: :.
" I
- 1/ !
Ii
I !
I
,
!
1\ !
I
-
1\ !
I
!I,I_\ ~
¡Ii; - lr
I
I¡¡i.
ii.-!!
lId,.
II"
'þ
~
J:::
~~
Q::!2
'«I
eJ~
~~
Q)U
1-.1
~ð
-~
Q
C§
Q::
gs
ii:
~
~
Q::
'« !!I!
:5 'i':
(,) ..'
9=;
U
!!!¡,
:1;:
I
!\
~
-~ 1/
I
~ I
- ..
~
I~
. þ
~
~
¡
~
I
(,)
~
~
Q
I I
:5
(j
Ii!:
:::>
~
(,)
~
~
Q
1
:5
(,)
i!:
gs
<:
I
""" ,
" .
...
"'",, ,
¡=;r= 1
~
r---I
r---
¡-.--I
1
r---
1
I
I
" , "
.
11:\
I
111:\
~
:::
I~
(¡j
IYY177IIt )l:)RJ lJf)J
. SNOU:J3S-ssog)
OYOH 1.J..OH J. Y S3ÐYllO:J
~ ~ ~ ~ 8
;!¡
==:::..--=--':."::
m=I r:wt:¥i1.
."., ,
ì
S
2:
".", ,
~
I
~
~
:::
~
(¡j
, ,
"
¡;¡
~
~
II
II
II
II
I
[I
[[
[I
I
11
11
[I
11
I
~
~
O/llN3~
~ ~ ~
"
¡;
8
~
'"
8
;!:
!
~
"
¡;¡
~
It..
J.
~
::::
~
(rj
8
<!;
¡
¡
..
i:
! I
, I .
: I !
8
;!:
:. : ¡
lJ..J
t1'
~
::::
~
(rj
~
" ...I~
1; ~8
~~
è!
EXHIBIT H
:i
~
==::..-.:::.=
f/YfT7Ht )t:JRJ lIO.:/
NY1d NOISOl/3 dff3J.
OVOY v.OH 1 V S3ÐVll0:J
/\/0 OOO'M3DO:1M
¡ \ \
~=:~
f'
97:11
~
,0'; =.1 37'1;)5 :
lSSI . ~
~
I
.
Î:
~!
¡..:'
(/)
~
...,
~
~
~
>~
Ci:::::
:>::~
Q:-----
<:( "-
Q-
1--------
Z <0
ë5 - --
Q-----
II)
::r:: -
<.:J--uu-
i"
- I
~
~
~
(;¡
!h
~
~
~
g
~ i I I I
~ II I I
I~ ~+~.
:::
'£
ð
I::
1<J
(¡j
- ,
.£r'fKK:I '.
03J.J. 1/7dNn :;< ::: ~
'. /I/O ){èJl/d lÑ/Od H5/H ,
f'
EXHIßIT I
::i
:Ii
==::.._=--=
~~~
69';:/<:/
~
~
¡
~
I
~
~
F!
8
..
a
~Uid
~ 1(113
I!: <96003
¡.:
CI)
¡:j
I')
~
:?:
~
rs
It
~ - ~
.0';-,,1 37'v':JS ¡¡
~ ISSl I
;¡:
~
E!
,~
la
-' 6E
" !!
~¡ Ib~
§I~
g6~
~~i
~.,
'f.
~
¡::
~
\ \
0311 \f7dNn
f' /\/0
TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc.
Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology
and
Environmental Earth Sciences
\
July 19,2001
Project No. T-3895-2
Mr. Mike Davis
Davis Consulting, Inc.
27013 Pacific Highway South, PMB #353
Des Moines, Washington 98198
Subject:
Wildlife Study
Hoyt Road Property
Federal Way, Washington
Dear Mr. Davis:
~
><
i:I
Et
...
...
As requested, we have conducted a Wildlife Study for the Hoyt Road Property located in Federal Way,
Washington. We visited the site on July 14,200 I to evaluate potential sensitive habitats and species of
concern. In addition, we accessed data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources
(WSDNR) Natural Heritage Program (NHP) and the Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife
(WSDFW) Priority Species and Habitats (PSH) databases. These databases contain current infonnation
regarding priority habitats and species of concern.
<.
GENERAL SITE CONDiTIONS
The subject property is an irregulàrly-shaped parcel comprising approximately 18 acres. Hoyt Road
passes through the property from north to south. Most of the property is located on the east side of Hoyt
Road. The site is currently undeveloped. Properties in the vicinity are developed with single-family
residences.
A mixed second-growth forest with a dense shrub understory covers the subject property. Trees include
Douglas fir (PseudOlsuga menziesit), western red cedar (Tñuja plicata), western hemlock (Tsuga
heterophylla), big-leaf maple (AceI' lIIacrophyllllllt), and red alder (Alnlls rubra). Shrubs include salal
(Gallltheria shallo,,), Indian plum (Oelllleria cerasiforlllis), red elderberry (Sambllcus racemosa),
mountain ash (Sorbus silchcnsis), trailing blackberry (Rllbus ursinus), and beaked hazelnut (Corylus
cornula). Herbaceous vegetation includes sword fern (Polyslichullt /Ilunilum), fiinge cup (Tellima
grandiflora), columbia brome (Brolltlls vlllgaris), sweet vernalgrass (AntllOxanthulll odoralum), bracken
fern (Pteridium aqui/Ùzum), and shield fern (Dryopteris expansa).
,.",.", ",,"~...- n~_~ c..,.~ ,n, "'-,.._~~ "'__L'~_._~ nnM.
Mr. Mike Davis
July 19~ 2001
Animal species observed includc Steller's jay (Cyaltocilla s/el/erz), American robin (Turdis
migra/orius), American crow (Corvus brachyrh)'lIcIlOs), and pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pi/eo/us).
The presence of mountain beaver (Apiodolliia mla) was confirmed by the observation of bulTows
throughout the site. In addition, the presence of black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemioltus) at the site was
confirmed by the observation of tracks and scat. Other animal species likely to be present at the subject
site are included on Table I. Inclusion on this list does not necessarily imply presence on the site.
~
The WSDFW PSH and the WSDNR NHP databases do not indicate the presence of any priority habitat
or species on or near the subject property.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND IMPACTS
Proposed development of the subject property consists of the construction of 40 single-family
residences. The Site Development Plan is shown on Figure 2. Access to the residences will be provided
by a private road that will loop through the subject property, connecting to Hoyt Road at both ends.
Two cul-de-sacs will provide access to building sites located at the northeast and southeast property
comers.
Based on our site observations and review of the State databases, it is our opinion that development of
this property will not impact any listed species or habitats of concern.
We trust the infom1ation presented in this letter is suflìcient for your culTent needs. If you have any
questions or require additional inforn1ation, please call.
David R. Teesdale
Ecologist
DRT:1cr
Encl:
Figure I - Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Site Development Plan
Table I - Potential Species List
Project No. T-3895-2
Page No.2
TABLE 1
POTENTIAL SPECIES LIST
Hoyt Road Property
Federal Way, Washington
Animal Type Common Name Scientific Name Seeond-Growth Mixed
Forest Forest
Amphibians Red-legged Frog Rana aurara / ~ .~
Nonhwcstern Salamander AlllbyStollla gracile ¡;z ¡;z
Pacific Chorus Frog Pseudacris regilla ~ ~
Western Toad Bufo boreas 0 ¡;z
W. Red-backed Salamander Ple/hodon vehiculum ¡;z; ¡;z;
Ensatina Ensa/ina eschschol/zii ¡;z fiZj
Rough-skinned New1 Taricha granulosa ~ ¡;z
Pacific Giant Salamander Dicamplodol1lenebrosus ¡;z; ¡;z;
Long-toed Salamander Ambysloma macrodac/ylum ¡;z; ~
Birds Golden-crowned Kinglet Regulus sa/rapa ¡;z; ¡;z
Chestnut-backed Chickadee Porus rufescel1s ¡;z ~
Willow Flycatcher Empidol1ax Iraillii ¡;z; C
Hammond's Flycatcher Empidollax hammal1dii 0 ¡;z;
Pacific Slope Flycatcher Empidol1at difJìci/is ¡;z 2:
Eastern Kingbird Tyral1l1us /yral1l1lls ¡;z; 0
Steller's Jay Cyanocilla s/elleri ¡;z; ¡;z
AmericanINonhwestern Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos ¡;z; ~
Black-capped Chickadee Parus a/ricappi/us ¡;z; ¡;z;
Western Wood Pewee COI1/opus sordidulus ¡;z; ¡;z;
Bushtil Psal/riparus minitlllls ¡;z; 0
Red-breasted Nuthatch Silla canadellSis liZJ ¡;z;
Brown Creeper Cer/hia americana ¡;z ¡;z
Olive-sided Flycalcher Con/opus borealis ¡;z
Winter Wren Troglody/es troglodytes ¡;z; ¡;z;
Red-breasted Sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber ¡;z ~
Ruby-crowned Kinglet Regulus calendula ¡;z 0
Swainson's Thrush Ca/harus us/lIla/lIs ¡;z; ¡;z;
Project No. 1'-3895-2
TADLE 1
POTENTiAL SPECIES LIST
(continued)
Hoyt Road Property
Federal Way, Washington
Animal Type
Common Namc
Scientific Name
Second-Growth Mixed
Forest Forest
Ruffed Grouse
Bollasa u",bellus
~ ~
IL
~ '--'
~ ~
~ 0
;;: ~.
, .
~ [j
~ 0
~ ;;Z;
~ ;y;:
~: ~
~ ~
0 5Z
C ~
0 ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ 5Z
~ ~
~ ~
~ ; ,
~ ¡;z;
~ ~
¡;z¡ ¡;z;
Birds
American Robin
Turdllo migratorillS
Bohemian Waxwing
Bombycil/a garruills
Bewick's Wren
ThlJ'omalles bewickii
Common Barn-owl
7)'10 alba
Green-backed Heron
Blliorides slrialllS
Wood Duck
Aix spollsa
Osprey
Bald Eagle
Pandion haliaellls
Haliaeellls leucocephala
Sharp-shinned Hawk
Accipiter siriallls
Cooper's Hawk
Accipiler cooperi
Red-tailed Hawk
Buleo jamaice/lsis
Merlin
Falco colllll/barills
Hairy Woodpecker
Picoides .'il/OSIIS
Band-tailed Pigeon
Coillmbafasciaia
Pileated Woodpecker
DI}'OCOPIIS pi/eallls
Western Screech-owl
OlliS kell/licol/Ii
Great Homed Owl
Bilbo ,'irginialllis
BaITed Owl
Slr¿< varia
Nonhern Saw-whet Owl
Aegolills acadiclls
Rufous Hummingbird
Selaspllorus "ifus
Cedar Waxwing
Bombycil/a cedrorllm
Downy Woodpecker
Picoides Pllbescens
European Starling
SIIImllS vlligaris
Nonhern Flicker
ColaplCS allrallls
Brown-headed Cowbird
Moloillm, ater '
Varied Thrush
Ixorells /laevills
Project No, T-3895-2
TABLE 1
POTENTIAL SPECIES LIST
(continued)
Hoyt Road Propcrty
Federal Way, Washington
Animal Type
Common Name
Scientific Name
Second-Growth Mixed
Forest Forest
Birds
Solitary Vireo
¡'ireo splitariliS
2
~ ~
~ 0
~ 6Z:
~ ~
~ 0
SZ ~
SZ 0
~ LJ
~ ' '
~ L;
~ C
" ~
2 ~
C 6Z:
C 6Z:
~ 0
~ iiz:
SZ ~
~ 0
~ ~
M 6Z:
6Z: 0
!i{; M
6Z: 6Z:
0 ¡;z;
¡;z; 0
Evening Grosbeak
CoccOll1raliSles vesperti/llIs'
American Goldfinch
Cardllelis Iris'lis
Pine Siskin
Cardllelis pinlls
House Finch
Carpodaclis mexicanlls
Northern Oriole
Iclerus galbliia
Dark-eyed Junco
JlInco hyemalis
Song Sparrow
Melospi=a me/odia
Fox Sparrow
Pa,rserel/a iIiaca
Rufous-sided Towhee
Pipi/o el)'lhropl1II",lmliS
Black-headed Grosbeak
Phellcliells melanoeephaills
Yellow Warbler
Dendroiea pelechia
Hutton's Vireo
Vireo IWI/oni
Purple Finch
Carpodaells pllrpllrells
Western Tanager
Piranga IlIdol'iciana
Warbling Vireo
Vireo gill'lIs
Orange-crowned Warbb
VermNora eelala
Yellow-romped Warbler
Dendroiea eoronaia
Black-throated Gray'Warbler
Dendroiea nigreseens
Townsend's Warbler
Dendroiea lo\\'l1Sendi
McGillivray's Warbler
Wilson's Warbler
Oparomis rolmiei
Wilson;o pllsilla
Mammals
Red-eyed Vireo
Black Bear
Vireo o/imeells
VrsliS amerieanlls
Bobcat
LYIl< rll¡lIs
Porcupine
Eräl1i=OIl dorsailim
Mink
Mlisieia I'ison
Projcct No. 1'-3895-2
TABLE 1
POTENTIAL SPECIES LIST
(continued)
Hoyt Road Property
Federal Way, Washington
Common Gal1cr Snake
71m/llnophis sirlalis
Second-Growth Mixed
Forest Forest
~ ¡;z:
" 2:
¡;z: ¡;z:
~ 0
~ ~
¡;z: ¡;z:
~ ~
~ 0
~ ¡;z:
2: ~
-- ~
~
~ ¡;z:
~ 0
~ !i{;
C' fZ
~ fZ
0 ¡;z¡
fZ 0
¡;z: ¡;z¡
fZ ~
¡;z: fZ
¡;z: 0
~ 0
0 ¡;z¡
0 ¡;z¡
fZ ¡;z¡
Animal Type
Common Kamc
Scientific Namc
Mammals
Raccoon
Proc)"!11 1010r
Shon-tailed Weasel
,llllslela er/llillea
Long-tailed Weasel
¡\JlIsleia/rellala
Spotted Skunk
Spilogale Plllorius
Striped Skunk
Mephitis mephitis
Elk
Cervllselaplllls
Red Fox
VIII pes vlllpes
Pacific Jumping Mouse
Zaplls IrillOlallis
Shrew-mole
Nellrotriclllls gibbsi
Coyote
COllis lalralls
Townsend's Chipmunk
£lIta/llias 101l'IIselldi
Bushy-tailed Woodrat
Neolollla eÙ,erea
Deer Mouse
Perolll)'selis l11allielilatlis
Beaver
Caslor ealladellsis
Northern Flying Squin'eI
Glalleolll)'s sabrÙlIIs
Douglas' Squirrel
Tamiascillrlls dollglasi
Black-tailed Deer
Odoeoilells hel11iollllS
Common Opossum
Didelphis virgillialla
Vagrant Shrew
Sore." ,'ogran.¡
Oregon Vole
Mierotlls oregolli
Dusk)' Shrew
Sorex obsellrlls
Snowshoe Hare
Leplls ameriealllls
Mountain Beaver
Apiodolllia rll/a
Eastern Cottontail
S)'/I.ilagllsjloridmllls
Pacific Mole
Scaf'I1I11IS orarills
Reptiles
Rubber Boa
Charilla bollae
Project No, T-3895-2
TABLE 1
POTENTIAL SPECIES LIST
(continued)
Hoyt Road Property
Federal Way, Washington
Animal Type
Common Name
Scientific Name
Second-Growth Mixed
Forest Forest
~ ~
2" ~
0 ~
Reptiles
W. Terrestrial Ganer Snake
Thalll/laphis elegalls
Nonhwestcm Gan", Snake
Thalllnophis ordinoides
Northern Alligator Lizard
£Igaria coerlliea
Project No. T-3895-2
_.~~ -- ~. .~'-~'", ".'" "...-'.~~'
"'.1
post.it' F.3X Note 7671
"f,J..,.,";,j (1\'~:LV;(S
Co./Oopt.
Pile<ltcd Woodpecker
Dryocopus pilealus
Pre/HIred by Jeffrey C. Lewis, Mðrie 1*."ùn, aN! E14ahtth A. Rðdrld:
GENERAL RANGE AND WASHINGTON DISTRlBUTION
Pileðted woodpeckers are year-found
residents from northern British Columbia,
and southern Canada east to Nova Scotia;
south to northern California, Idaho,
Montana; eastern Kan:;as and south to Gulf
Coast a!\d Florida. The Washington
distribution en~omjJasses the forested areas
of the StAte,
STATUS
The: pi1c:ated woodp<:åer h a State
Candidate species.
t"-
>
::r
..
E
~
Range of the pileatQd woodpecker. QryocopU$
p/leatu$. in Washington. Map derived from the
liter;ture,
'-
Volum.IV, ¡¡¡,do. M.,<~ 1995
W.ohino.an O.pa<tmant .1 ~i.h aM W'oIdI<k
32,1
--- -- ~- -V'--"" ~., ,. ".--'-'.--'.
"-..<
RATIONALE
Pileated 'woodpeckers are recreational!y important, non-çoosumptive wildlife. The availability
of large snags and decadent live trees used as nesting habitat ha$ declined as a result of timber
management practices and an expanding huma!1. population.
HABITAT REQUIREMENTS
Pileated Woodpa:kc.rs inhabit mature and old-growth forests, and second-growth forests with
large snags and fallen trc",. Lë.rge snags a!1d decadent live trees in older forests are generally
used by pi!eated woodpeckers for nesting and roosting throughout their range (Mellen 1992,
Aubry and Raley 1995, 1996, Bull and Jackson 1995). In western Oregon and Washington
they may use younger {orest.¡ (40-70 y~s old) as foraging habitat (Mellen 1992; Aubry and
Raley 1995, 1996).
Nesting
The breeding season for pile.aied woodpeckers is from mid-March to late June. They excavate
large nest C<lvitics in snags or Jive trees with decaying portions. Bull (1987) in northeast
Oregon reported that nests had entrances 12 em (4.7 in) high and9 em (3.5 in) wide and
internal dimensions 4S em (17.7 in) deep and 21 em (8.3 in) wide. Pileated woodpeckers may
sM a number of cavity excavations throughout the year but generally only fini$h and nest in
one (Mannan 1984, Bull 1987, Mellen 1987).
Studies in Oregon aná Washington have reporred me<in pilealed woodpecker nest tree
characteristics as 69 cm (27 in) dbh and 27 m (87 it) high in western Oregon (Mellon 1987),
84 cm (33 in) ábh and 28 m (92 It) high in northeastern Oregon (Bull 1987), and 101 çm (40
in) dbh and 40 m (131 ft) high in westem Washington (Aubry and Raley 1995). Typicà1 nest
trees included weste..'l11arch CLar.x ccci~n:a!is), pondc.rosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), and black
cottonwood (Populus trichocarpü) east of th.; Cascade Mounlains (Madsen 1985, Bull 1987),
Douglas-fIr (Pseudotsuga mer.ziesj¡j znd grand fIr (Abies grO1ldis) in the Oregon Coast N,ange
(Mellen 1987, Nelson 1988), and Westem hemlock (1Suga Mtuophylla) and PacifiC silver fir
(Abies amabilis) on the Olympic Peninsula (Aubry and Raley 1995). Most nestrrees were
hard snags with Intact bark and broken tQPs, or live trees with dead tops.
Roosting
Roost trees are used at night and during inclemCl\t weather. Pileated woodpeckers will use 4-
11 roosts over a 3.10 month period, some birds wiU use one roost for a long period of time
before switching to a new roost, lI1d others regularly switch among several roosts (Bull et al.
1992b).
VoIumt IV: Bitda. M.«h 1999
32-2
W""'l1fIton Cap..",....,./ fiooh ond WIIdIIf. -.
1""'.-"
Roost and nest trees of pileated woodpedœrs differ in species and physical characteristics.
Bull et aI. (1992b) found that pilcatcd woodpeckers used live trees or snags for roosting and
nesting basOO on tree species, wood condition, and dbh. They reported that roost trees were
sma11~r than nest trees [70 em (28 in) Vi. 80 cm (31 in) dbh, respectively); roos~ were often
in hollow or rotten areas of a tree or snag, whereas nests were excavated in solid wood; rOOSt
chambers had more entrance holes than nests; and roosts were predominantly in grand fir,
whereas nest trees were predominantly ponderO$;\ pine an<! western larch (Bun et al. 1mb).
Aubry and Raley (1995) found that pHe.ated woodpeckers on the Olympic Peninsula pri~ly
roosted and nested in western hcmlûo:k, Pacific silve¡ fir, &.I1d western red cedar (ThuJa
plicara) trees or snags with avc:r..gc àbh's greater than those used for nesting. Large [2( () em
(79 in) dbh) wcstern red cedars were used for roosting, but not for nesting. Tltey found that
88 % of all roosts were located in old and mature forests (Aubry and lWey 1996). .
Foraging
Pileated woodpeckers Îor..gc prima",iiy within forests older than 40 years of age in western
Oregon (Mellen et aI. 1992) and in old and mature forest on the Olympic Peninsula (Aubry
and Raley 1996). They selàom use cle.arcuts, but do forage in shelterwood cuts if logging
debris is retained (Mannan 1984, Mellen 1987). Pileated woodpeckers forage on large snags
[>50 em (20 in) dbh), live trees, logs [> 18 em (7 in) dbh], and stumps (especially naturally.
formed vers\Js c\Jt]. In Oregon and Washington, food habits consist of carpenter and thatching .
ants, beetle larvae, territites, and other ins~ts (Bu1! et al. 1992a, Aubry and Raley l!l%).
Snags &.I1d live tzus take on special importance in winter for foraging when logs and stumps
rt:1ay be covered with snow (McClelland 1979, Bu1! and Holthausen 1993). Large
rectangu1ar/oval holes in snags are indicative of pileated woodpecker foraging (McClelland
1979, Neitro et al. 1985, Bun and Jackson 1995).
Home Range
Home ranges vary in size within the Pacific Northwest from 407 ha (1,006 ac)/breeding pair
in northeastern Oregon (Bull and HoHhllusen 1993), 480 ha (1,186 ac)/pair in the central
Oregon Co!!St RzIJge (Mc1leII et::.1. 1992), !Jld 863 h.s (2,132 ac)/breeding pair on the OlympIc
. Peninsula (Aubry and Raley 1995). Home ranges of individuals that lost mates åre larger ~
those of mated individuals, &lid pairs with young have larger home ranges than pairs without
. young (Mellen et aI. 1992, Bull and Holthausen 1993). Home ranges geneta1ly consiat of
>~" forest habitat (Bull and Ho1thausen 1993), and this is predominantly latc-succc:uional
forest habitat (Bull and Holthausen 1993, Aubry and Raley 1995, 1996). Fragmentation of
habitat is considered one of the factOrs influencing hom~ range size in pileated woodpeckers.
Vofu",e IV: iii/d.. Mareh 1"8
32-3
Washington D.øartment of R." ond Wildfife
--- -- ~. .~.~.,....,.. ,;.~,-,_c.,-,-...
P.4
LIMITING FACTORS
Availability of large snags or de.:adent live trees as a source of nesting habitat.
MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Management activities ror pJl","l"d "",,(><Jpwk~rs n=l to focus on providing and maintaining
adequate and appropriate large snags and decadent live trees for nesting and roosting. Snags
and live trees created or retained for these woodpeckers need to be available when site
conditions are suitable for t/oJs species. For example, pilea.ted woodpeckers generally do not
nest or roost in clearcuts; however, this is often where snags and trees are retained.
Furthermore, many of these snags and trees will be goae (fallen, cut for fuewood, buriled, or
decomposed) or unsuitable by the time a suitable stand grows up around the snags.
Providing nesting arid roosting habitat can be achieved in several ways. Pirst, suitable snags
can be created in older second growth stands using snag creation techniques (Bull and
Partridgc 1986). Second, green recruitment trees can be left in adequate number and
distribution in cle2Icuts to provide iarge snags (using snag creation techniques) later in the
rotation when the.stand has developed. Third, uneven-aged management of forest stands can
provide a means to leave adequate ca.!1.óPY closure and snags to maintain suitablc nestin~rand
rooSting habitat for piIeated woodpeckers. Fourth, defective or cull trees (those with heart rot, .
forked or bro1œn tops, cavities, pileated cxcavations) that may become or are suitable as
habitat, eM be retained during commercial thinning operations; these can also be used as ¡reen
reCruitment trees in the sub.sequent rotation.
Managers may have greater flexibility when providing foraging habitat. Foraging habitat can
be provided by retaining namra11)' formed stumps a.'1d numerous large logs in various Sl;ages of
decay. MAnagement for snags, cuHs, and green recruitment trees eM ultimately provide lari:e
downed logs as foraging habitat. Protr:ction of riparian habitats and the provisions of
significant buffers along streams will provide foraging habitat for pileated woodpeclcers
(Mellen et al. 1992).
The U.S. Forest Service (1986) has I! mandate to rn.a.intain viable populations of wildlife on
public lands, and as a result ihey devclopcd Minimum Management lœcommen4ations
(MMRs). The pil"'ltOO woodpc:cker w¡¡,¡ selected as a management indicator species for old-
growth conifer forests because its highest densities óccur in old growth. The MMRs fo. the
püœted woodpecker apply to a 400 ha (1,000 ac) unit. Within the unit, 240 ha (600 ac) are
managed for one pair of pileated woodpeckers: a 120 ha (300 ac) old growth or mature
. nesting area and an addiûonall20 hI! (300 ac) area. for feeding. One such habitat area is
retained for every 4,850 ha (12,000 ac) dispersal area. Specific requirements (or the 120 ha
(300 at) nesting area include maintaining at least Shard snagslha (2/ac) > 30 em (12 in) dbh
Voklm.IV: SlId:. M.reh 193a
32.4
w.."'"gto" o.P""","nt of Fish on4 wadtife
-'~- -~ ~- -~'--'"' '..' ,. ,---',"--
t",j
(600 snagsl120 ha or 300 ac). Of these, 45 snagsl120 ha (300 ac) should be > 50 em (20 in)
dbh. A minimum of 5 hard snags/ha (2/ac) > 25 em (10 in) dbh also should be maintained in
the additional 120 ha (300 ac) feeding area.
The MMRs were based on data (rom northeast Oregon where there are high densities of
pUca-ted woodpecker with small home ranges (Bull 1987). Studies in western Oreeon show
lower densities and a me4l\ home range Ihal is twice the size found in northeast Oregon
(Mannan 1984, Mellen 1987). Consequently, Mellen (1987) recommended increasing th~ size
of the nesting and feeding areas for each breeding pair in western Oregon by 50%.
Also from nol1he<lStem Oregon, Bull and Holthausen (1993) recommended retaining 8
snags/ha (3.2Is.e) with at le4St 20% being ~51 em (20 in) dbh. They also recommend
retaining ~loo logslha (40/:le) as foraging substrate in management areas, with a preference
for logs ;,38 em (15 in) in diameter, for all species except lodgepole pine.
Although, both of the above discussed sets of reç.ommendations are based on data from
northeast Oregon they do provide some minimum habitat guidelines for pileated woodpeckers
throughout the nor'.nwest. Conner (1979) argued that managing for the minimum may cause
gradual population declines. Instead, he suggested that average values for habitat components
be used in forest management. The major studies discussed cadier in this document reported
ayerage nest tree diameters of 69-101 em (27-40 in) depending on spedfielocatiol\ (Bull 1987,
Mellon 1987, Aubry and Raley 1995). We (WDFW)would agree that using av~ge values
for habitat components (dbh of trees for negûng, roosûng, and foraging and number of nest
trees and downed logs provided/ha) wouid be prudent, however as a minimum we recommend
that the Forest Serviœ MMR's be fenewed.
REFERENCES '
Aubry, K. 1!., :l!!d C. M. R>ley, 1995, Ecology of pH~têd wovd X'cl.:ers in ~ IAadscopes DIllhe Olympic
Pewu!a. Pag« 61-64 In £cology, ='.cm<:üt, ;u¡d cotW!rv.tioa of sensitive wildJif'e speci....
Unpub\. Rep., U.S. For. Serv., PNW Re:!. Su, 01YIII¡>ia, Wash.
. ~,lIld-: 1996. Ecology ofpil...tedwoodP"-'-l<e... ÎI1 =ged bndscope< OD lheOlympic Peainsuta.
Pag.. 70-74 in Ecology, =n'geO1ellt. and conserv.tioa of ......itive wild1i(" speci.... Ullpubl. Rep.,
U.S. Par. Serv., PNW Res. Sta, Olympia, Wash.
Bull, E. L. 1987. Ecology of tho pil"led woodJ"'Cker in lIorth""~RI Ore\1Ol1. 1. Wild\. M8IIAge. Sl:4n-4&1.
-, R. c. Beckwith, a¡¡d R. S. Hoith,u...,. 1992&, Arlhtopod diet of piloated woodpeckeR ÎII DOtthee.olem
Oregoa. Nomw.... Nal. 73:42-45.
-, and R. 8. HoltJu.....,o.. 1993. Habitat use end m.a.aa:emenl of of pilea~ woodpeckers ÎII aonheutenl
OregOil. 1. Wildt. Manigc. 57:335-345.
VolumolV: Eirdc. Mo'ch 1998
32-5
W..hington Deportment of F1.h and W-
--- -- -.
.U'-~. ~..,.. ""--'-"'LL'
1".6
-. -, ",d M. G. HeojuiD. 1990. Tõo:htUq- ro, monitories pileated II<oodp«ken. U.S. Poco Sen'.
PNW.(jTR.269.
-. -, I.!!d -. 1992b. Roo,t t=s US<d by piloated Wl><)dpecl;m in uorthcutem Oregoø.. 1. Wildt.
M""g~. 56:786.793.
-, I.!!d 1. E. la.hoo. 1995. Pil""tod woodpeok« (Dry.copus piløalus). No. 148 In A. Poole md P. Gill.
ods. 11>, BiN; of N. Am. A"-"Í. .v.'I. $ci. ""d Am. Ornitbol. Uu.ioa, Philadolpåi4. Pa
-, ""d A. D. F3nridge. 1986. M.thcd; ofkHliag w.. for UM by cavity ncot..... Wildl. Soc, BuU. 14:142-
1~. . .
Conner, Ie N. 1979. MiciC1"m su"d.>,d¡ and for..t "ildUr. lIWI'gtmout. Wild!. Soc. Bull. 7:293-296.
Madseo., S. 1. 1985. H.bil.:a u"" b~ cavity-ceoting bird¡ in lb. O\;lnogiLI N.tioul FoNS!, Wo.shington. M.S.
Tn.>.iJ:, Uciv. Wos\¡., S""ttlc. .
MannI.!!, R. 19~4. Summer are¡ ,«¡uire",eot; of pn""ted woodpeok"t8 in W"!em Oregon. Wildl. Soc. lull.
12:265-268.
-, W., E. C. lot..10w, L,d H. M. Wigb!. I no. Use of snag' by birò, in Dougl..-fir forests, wes u¡
Oregon. 1. Wild!. MonA!e. 44:187-797.
McClelland, B. R. 1979. Thê pil...ted woodpecker in feteSts of the northðm Rocky Mounbw. pp 283-299 in
1.0. Dicksoo et al.. ods. ~ role of i:>=ÜVO1"ou< bird, in foresl ecœy<tems. Acad. Prea, New Yoclc.
N~ .
M"Uen, T. K. 1987. Hom. rólJ1ge and Mbita! use by pi!..!<.d woodpeclœn. M. S. Thesis. Oreg. Stale U,,;v.,
<ÄrvaUis. 96 pp.
-, E. c. Mes!ow, ,",,<1 R. W. M=;on. 1992. Home rang6 and babita' Wð of pilea1ed woodpeclcenz, weoIeno
Oregon. 1. Wild!. Mana¡!e. S6:96-102.
Neitro. W. A., V. W. BirJ<lcy, S. P. Cline, R W. MaIUWl, B. G. Marcol. D. Taylor. and F. F. Wagner. 19&5.
Snags (Wildlife trees). Pages 129.169 In Brown, E. R, tech. ed. ~mcnl olwild1ife and 1i.h
habitats in forests of Western O<ogon and Waslùng¡on. U.S. For. Serv. Pub!. No. M-1'&;WI..192.198$.
322 pp.
NwOO!!, S. 1(. 1988. Habitat 1l<õ and d.n:il;'" of cavity outing birds in the f?rogon Cout Rmg... M.S. ThMia.
Oreg. SUle Urúv.. CotVaUis. .
Talœkawa.1. Y., E. O. G!rtoo, and L. Lange!iu. 1982. Biological çoølrol of(Ofeit ill_I oulbc..Jcs: the UN
of.vian pred.1to.rn. Tnns. N. ;'.m. Wild!. I.!!d Nat.!1.<:s. <Äetf. 47:393-409.
'làom.u,1. W., R. G. ADdemoo, C. M....,r, and E. L. Bull. 1979. Snags. Pagen 60-77 In 1. W. Thomas, Iech.
ed. Wildlife hlbiUts in IIW14ged fote:lls' the Blue Mouulaina of <maca md Washington. U.s. Dept.
Agne. Agnc. HlUldbook No. 553.
United State! Fotu! Service. 1996. Repon and b~ro\1(¡d document! on Minimum Managemeo\
RccoC11Jl>õtld1I;oCtS lor forest pl:u:ninz 00 tho No6"".1 Fo"",1 of the Pacific North_I Region. U.S. Foe.
Serv., Þortland. Oro.g.
VoI"",oIV: BIrd'. March 1998
32-6
W.ohlftg1o. Dop""'a.t of flo" and WII<IIIf.
.~~ ~~ ~. .U'~~'" ~."" ".~~'_".LL'
t".7
KEY POINTS
Habitat Requirements
. Pìleated woodpo:ckers inhabit mature and old-growth forests, and second-growth forests
with numerous large snags and fallen trees.
. They nest in snags, and in live trees with dead tops. Nest trees generally exceed 69 cm
(27 in) doh and 27 m (87 ti) in height.
. Roost trees are typically large diameter Jive trees and snags with hollow chambers. A
number of roosts 2fe used by each individual.
. They forage on large snags, Jive trees, logs, and stumps for ants, beetle larvae,
termites, and other insc<:ts.
" Home ranges have been documented to be 480 halpair (1,186 acIpair) in the central
Oregon Coast Range, 863 halpair (2,132 ae/pair) on the Olympic Peninsula in
Wa¡¡hington, and 401 haJpair (1,006 ae/pair) in northeastern Oregon.
Management Recommenda iions
. . U.S. Forest Service Minimum Management Recommendations: Maintain onç 240 ba
(600 ac) habitat area for 1 pair of pileated woodpeckers and disperse every 4,850 ha
(12,000 at). Nesting area - 120 ha (300 ae) with Shard snagslba (2Iac) >30 em (12
in) doh, 45 of there 600 snags/120 ha of 300 ae should be >50 çm (20 in) dbh.
Foraging area - 120 ha (300 ae) with 5 hard snagslha (2Iac) 25 em (10 in) dbh.
Monitoring techniques for pileated woodpeckers ~hould follow Bull et aI. (1990).
. Use snag creation techniques to provide h.abitat where and when it is la.cking. Site
qualities are important to coinsider when providing nesting and roosting habitat, as
pileat.ed woodpeckers generally do not nest or roost in clearcuts or young stands.
VoIum.IV, lIi,d.. "'otch IS9S
32-7
W..hlngton O.p4Jt1men( of Fi.h end WIldlife
-~ -v v¿ .v',,~, ~c< ~ ".u...'.N'-<."
F.e
0 During commcriC3.\ th.il\nittg and harvesting, leave deformed or dying trees and ¡reen
replacement trees of sufficient size 10 replace existing snags whClt they fall. Leave
large logs and stumps in various stages of decay.
Volunl. IV: Bitds. Motch lSaa
32-8
, .
W..hlngtan D_M of f'otI\ 8<14 ŸIi1dI;'o
iN3m
StlS6 VM '.IIIDOS
"^IJ( '.U O" "0 tO661
swolIlIM ""I"
EXHIBIT L
~ \- """ -G=i
-'-
~W' -
~.~
ç ' 01
uo¡6UluOOM 'l.DM DJOP'J
NVld !lJJ.SV"
avO" 1J.OH lV =VllO~
f' "1\/0
,69"'CI
'i
. ~
~
",'
"
031.1. '¡f7dNn
'" "':::'
"1\/0 - >f~'¡fd 1.N/Od Ha/H
IItle6 VII< "nloos
_a ""IOre .'a -61
lWO1I1IM 'PIM
OV:~6::;~~ ~~ -T~I
~l
,
\
I --
-..-- ... -I: ""':
-W"
I (
. . , '.
( , ,
\ \
\ ~I
\ I
!N31lJ
!:¡3rO~d
9"96 VM 'OIl¡OOS uo¡6U 4'OM "OM D"'P..
.^IJO "uJO 'i '.0 t0661 SNOI1~3S SSO¡¡:¡
'WOIilIM ""I~ OVO~ lÁOH !V SJaVllO:¡
~;~~ ~ - I ..:= ---=
. .-::~~::- - - ~...-
fi ~ ---.- - "& -: ;; -
- -------
I¡II
I ¡ i
§I
. I, I ,
~ II
M i i
¡ I
II
¡ ¡
u
Davis Consulting, Inc
27013 Pacific Highway South
PMB #353
Dc.Moines, WA 98198-9250
(253) 859-3750
Fax (253) 859-3738
Wednesday, November 22, 2000
,¡ Tim McHarg
City of Federal Way
33530 - 1st Way South
Federal Way, W A 98003
RE: Cottages at Hoyt Road
Dear Tim:
Pursuant to our many conversations regarding the open space requirementa at the above referred project:
t"J
~
~
tc
~
..,
On behalf of Rick Williams, I formally request \0 a pay a fee in lieu of providing the required on site open
space. As you are aware due to the on sitc topogmphy it is impossible to provide the required open space.
Thank-you for your attention to this mancr. (fyoll should have any questions please call me at the number
listed above.
~
,~, ~ -,' "Jf\nITTED
f'\ t,~) l.HJ\vl. '
,'IOV 'i- 2. 2000
1f1~/()(J 7/q<;'
, .
This ro!'Jt1ificalo provides 010
Dopartmonl oi Hoallh and Iho
Dopat1mont of Dovolopmont and
Environmental SotVicos wilh
kllomwUcn nocessaty 10 evaluale
dovelopmont proposals.
Plc"so 'clutIIlo:
@~...: KING COUNTY
II!II DepannlCol of Development and
EnvironmcuW Services
900 Oakcsda1e Avenue Southwest
Renlon. WA 98055-1219
KING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AYAIlJI.ßIUTY
¡Do not WHte .n tlUs box
number
0 Buil~.in> Permit
0 Short Subdivision
Jì<i Prclimindrv Pldt or PUD
0 Rezone or other
IJ'PL¡c;.¡rr'S NAME ??Jc...) \"c.-
PlUJI'OStD QSt í?E""Þé.\..\ílAL- --10 -:=",\6U'.. - F-AMI~r I..oT'"
LOCATJDN \" A'I. t'ARr £1 1\.\". H'2..IO~-l\Oll,o
'3~-;z.,xX t\o'iì ROA\:> ~~ .ç:.¡:.i'>E-RAL V-jA"i - AT?"Pf'.hX
(AttAch "'p . h9Al d.!.cription 1: nocosnryl
I I ! I I I I I I I I I
StWtR AGEtlCY nlrORMATlOtl
[)-tU
^:þ'
-. <:
:JQ C
,~ -.'
OõiO
g ~:;
~-< ~
<. 0'"
° ",V>
.: = 6
~ ¡;¡' œ
o~~
:0 '"
"'" V>
2.=~
."cro;
'" "'-
O-o>õ
'" 0 :J
QìO-
- CD :T
:::(£~
0>"'-
",O-:T
crv;
'"
1.
A.O
<-AI-!
Sewer service w-H-i- be provided by side sewer connection only to
An cxi&tin9 sizo sewer feet from the site
And the sewer syste., hAS the CApACity to serve the proposed u$C.
OR ,.J,
b'l6J
t":I
~
-
tQ
-
...¡
Z
Se"er service "ill require An imprbve.,ent to the se"er system of.
0 (1)
~nd/or
feet of se"er trunk or htterAl to ruch the dte,
1ZÍ (2)
the construction of d collectio,. oyotem on the site,
And/or
j8¡ (J)
',)IT,..
'h1'>'TRI(í
POLl<:-"
other (describe) r-.:",-,,'h "Tn F-"'R ~E-,E- "" AccoI<D.o.>Jc.L
2.
~. tzf
OR
b.O
J. ~'IZ!
OR
b.o
The sewer system i.,provement is in conform,,",ce witb a County approved s."er
comprehensive plAn.
Th. ..".r syct.m improvemen< "ill require a so".r comprehensivo
phn. ~mendment.
The proposed projoct is within the corporAte limits of the district,
or hAS been 9unted Boundary Revie" BoArd Approval for extension
of service outside the d.htrict or city,
(.
Service is subject to the folloYin9'
Annex~tion or BRB approvAl will be necesGAry to provide service.
~.
Connection charge.
,tJ Rf', C/l~c.U(A-ré.D
b. Ene.,ent!s) , AS I?£QJ()IRé1)
c. Other". bEv~ £Xrú.I:510N Æ-&RUJLIé.NT 1?E.{}ÚleéJJ
. 'l11e District. at its sole d.1.Scre J..OO reserves the ri~or rW'I"ð~'
based upon capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor tacili bUDI) k. '
I hereby cer~i~¡' th...~ the ..bove sewer ...¡¡oncy information is rue. Th.1s
cen1t1ca.tion sh..11 be va.l1d for one yeo.r from date ot si¡:-na.turÂO'J 7. 7. 2000
Lakehaven Utility District
A'1ency "a..e
ìÆ.\I~PMEkIT SERVIŒ..S SUPERVISOR.
. Tith
jjARÝ é. )1M^,6
Si'1n&tory N~"e
IfÚif/ é. ~
I fi'1na re
. ,-.D. ¡,I«fl.
I/i/ðð
DaÚ
@ King County
~ DDES
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
900 Oakesdale Avenue Soud,west
Renton. Wa 98055-1219
This certifIcate provides !he ScaWs KIng
County Department of Public Health and
!he Department of Development and
Environmental Services with InfolTnalion
necessary to evaluate development
proposals.
Please relurn to DOES at the address
atthe left.
King County Certificate of Water Availability
I Do not write in this box
number
name
0 Building Permit
0 Short Subdivision
QJ Preliminary Plat or PUD
0 Rezone or other
Applicant's name:
Proposed use: P('()~~w' ('ntltiq.es oJ- cNOi.j.f-
Location:~~~~~i-~OltLff M ~UJ
(attaoh map and legal description n necessary)
f2¡d
Water purveyor info.rii1á~~ri't
1. 0 a. Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing
is feet from the site.
OR
~ b. Water service will require an Improvement to the water system ot
0 (1) feet of water main to reach the site; andlor
r¡¡¡ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site: andlor
tJ (3) Other (desoribe)
(size) water main that
t'1
g
t=
-
'"'
0
2. QI a. The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan.
OR
0 b. The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment
3. 0 a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary
Review Board approvat for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County
approved service area of a private water purveyor.
OR
0 b. Annnexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service.
4. 0 a. Water islor will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi
measured at the nearest fire hydrant feet from the building/property (or as marked on
the attached map):
Rate off/ow Duràtion
0 less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) 0 less than 1 hour
0 500 to 999 gpm 0 1 hour to 2 hours
ID 1000 gpm or more ID 2 hours or more
0 flow test of gpm 0 other
0 calculation of gpm
(Note: Commercial building permits require flow test or calculation.)
OR
0 b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow.
Comments/conditions: The reauirements of Kino Countv Ordinance 5828 pertainina to fire code
reGulations must be adhered to.
I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year
from date of signature.
Tacoma Water
/V;¡enr;f name
Utllitv Services Rep I
Title
JJ:~~~ED
FOfWS6SO98.3 _<11- de
(1oomedy 104m ....- F 278)
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
ITEM# ~ J
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Letter to King County Regarding Proposed Reductions to Human Services Programs
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[8J
D
D
CONSENT
RESOLUTION
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: I) Letter to King County Executive Sims regarding proposed reductions to Human Services
Programs, as modified by the Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety (PRHSPS) Committee; and 2) Memo
to the PRHSPS Committee, which includes an overview of the proposed reductions and implications for City residents,
detailed infonnation on the proposed reductions, and a memo from the King County Executive to Mayor Park regarding
elimination of child care subsidies for residents of incorporated cities.
SUMMARVjß Á CKGROtJNDi'T'bekTñg-CoïiïiïY Execiïïjve'¡Jrojïi¡;ïsi"36ïillïTíori'dûÏÏïífd efiëliifiiiïeiÕ'Õi'CuíTeïii"
Expense Fund budget. The Executive's 2002 proposed budget addresses this shortfall in a number of ways including a
proposed reduction of 5.4 million dollars in funding for human services programs. A number of programs serving Federal
Way residents would be reduced or eliminated including subsidized child care for the working poor, case management
services for the Korean elderly population, teen crisis line and access to infonnation regarding available services. (See
Attachment 2 for details on the services to receive reductions.) At their October 8, 2001 meeting, the PRHSPS
Committee reviewed the proposed reductions, the implications for Federal Way residents, and a draft letter to King
County Executive Ron Sims from the City Council regarding the reductions.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The PRHSPS Committee recommends approval ofthe
letter with one change, which is to note that the proposed reductions to the Federal WayILakeland Senior Center will also
have an impact on Federal Way residents. (See the underlined addition in Attachment I.)
PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of the letter to King County Executive Ron Sims regarding proposed
reductions to human services programs, as recommended by the Committee."
CITY MANAGE~-~;;~~~~~"""""'~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
'.'.".'.".."'.'.'."'.'."".'."'."'.""...."'"_........
COUNCIL ACTION:
D
D
APPROVED
DENIED
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
D TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED-O5/10/2001
Attachment 1
October 16, 2001
~~,
\)~f;/o.ID I
The Honorable Ron Sims
King County Executive
King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue, Room 400
Seattle, WA 98104-2312
Dear Executive Sims:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Federal Way City Council regarding your proposal for budget
reductions in 2002. While the Council recognizes the serious fiscal issues facing the County,
we are concerned about the cuts proposed for human services.
As you know, the City of Federal Way contributes financial support to agencies to help address
the human services need of Federal Way residents. Through the City's Human Services
general funds and Community Development Block Grant funds, the City contributes more than 1
million dollars annually to human services programs serving Federal Way residents. In addition
to the funding some agencies receive from the City of Federal Way, they also rely on funds
provided by the County to serve the needs of their clients. Those same agencies provide
services to a substantial number of county residents as well.
The proposed $5.4 million reduction in human services from the Current Expense Fund and the
Children and Families Commission will have a serious impact on the residents of the City of
Federal Way, especially in the provision of subsidized child care for the working poor, case
management services for the Korean elderly population, senior programs at the Federal
Way/Lakeland Senior Center (in unincorporated King County), teen crisis line and access to
information regarding available services. In addition, the proposed elimination of the Special
Appropriations program would also have serious impacts on services funded by the County and
the City of Federal Way. Services potentially impacted by elimination of the program include
basic health services for low-income residents, emergency shelter for homeless individuals and
families; youth support programs and domestic violence and sexual assault services.
The Council is particularly concerned that the proposed reductions are in conflict with the
County's human services policies. The policies indicate that funds will be used to help assure
access to basic services for those most vulnerable and most in need and provide services that
reduce the impact on the County's juvenile and adult criminal justice systems. However, the
proposed funding reductions would reduce or eliminate critical basic services that are needed to
keep individuals and families self-sufficient.
In addition, we are concerned that designating the proposed cuts based on the County's
adopted polices could unfairly affect agencies within cities because they may not primarily serve
unincorporated residents. King County residents who reside in cities provide financial support
for countywide services through the payment of county taxes and they should be provided the
same access to services as residents in unincorporated areas. In 2000, Federal Way residents
paid more than $20,784,769 in property, sales and other taxes to King County.
In closing, the Federal Way City Council urges you to reconsider the proposed reductions for
these critical human services. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter,
please do not hesitate to contact Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager at (253) 661-4039.
Sincerely,
Mike Park
Mayor
cc:
King County Council Members
Federal Way City Council
Federal Way Human Services Commission
David Moseley, Federal Way City Manager
Kathy McClung, Director, Community Development Services
Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager
k: Icdhslcounci IIkchsred ucti onllr
Attachment 2
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
Date:
From:
Via:
Subject:
October 1, 2001
Ann Guent~er, Hu n Services Managerd.b-
David Mose anager
Letter to the g Co nty Executive Regarding Proposed Cuts to Human
Services Programs
Back!lround
The purpose of this memo is to provide the Committee with information regarding the
reductions proposed to human services programs in the 2002 King County budget, the
implications for services to Federal Way residents, and to provide a draft letter to the King
County Executive from the City Council regarding the human services reductions for the
Committee's consideration. The Committee is asked to review the letter, make any desired
changes, and forward it to the full Council for approval at the October 16, 2001 meeting.
Attachments to this memo include: 1) Draft letter to King County Executive Rom Sims from the
City Council regarding the reductions to human services programs; 2) June 1, 2001 memo to
the Parks Recreation Human Services and Public Safety Council Committee with attachments
outlining reductions to specific programs and; 3) August 9, 2001 letter to Mayor Park from King
County Executive Ron Sims regarding the elimination of child care subsidies for residents of
incorporated cities.
The King County Executive projects a 36 million dollar deficit in the 2002 Current Expense fund
budget and an expected 22 million dollar deficit in 2003. The Executive's 2002 proposed
budget addresses this shortfall by combining several departments and making reductions in the
areas of Human Services, Arts and Heritage, Law and Justice, and Public Health. The Human
Services reductions are projected to be approximately 5.4 million dollars to the Department of
Community and Human Services and the Children and Family Commission budgets.
Implications for Services to Federal Way Residents
The proposed reductions will impact services to Federal Way residents in a number of ways
including: elimination of child care subsidies to residents of incorporated cities, reductions to
specific programs funded in the Community Services Division (CSD) budget; and elimination of
the Special Program Appropriations budget allocated each year by individual County Council
members. Below is a summary of the proposed cuts that will impact Federal Way residents.
For a detailed list of the agencies to receive reductions, see Attachment 2.
The King County Child Care program currently provides subsidies for 24 Federal Way
residents, at a cost of $114,794 per year. These subsidies will not be available to City residents
as of January 1, 2002. Families currently receiving subsidies through the King County program
will need to find child care subsidies from other sources.
Of the agencies funded through the King County CSD budget, the following agencies serving
b-l-
Federal Way residents will receive reductions in 2002: Child Care Resources, Information and
Referral; Crisis Clinic, Community Information Line and Teen Link; Evergreen Club, Korean
Seniors; and the King County Domestic Violence Coalition.
The Special Program Appropriations funds allocated each year by individual County Council
members total 1 million dollars annually. In 2001, 20 organizations serving Federal Way
received more than $95,000 including these human services programs: ACAP Courthouse
Child Care (RJC); Community Health Centers of King County; Domestic Abuse Women's
Network (DAWN); Evergreen Club, Korean Seniors; Federal Way Boys and Girls Club; Federal
Way Community Caregiving Network, FUSION Program; Federal Way Norman Center, YMCA;
King County Sexual Assault Center, Multi-Service Center, and the South King County Youth
Violence Prevention Committee. In addition to human services agencies these funds were also
allocated to service clubs, the Greater Federal Way Chamber of Commerce, the Federal Way
Historical Society and the St. Francis Hospital Foundation. The Special Appropriations are not
included in the King County Executive's 2002 proposed budget.
The County is currently reviewing changes to their policies for aging services, which may
impact the funding for those programs. Specifically, funding for the Evergreen Club, Korean
Seniors Program ($25,911 annually), is slated to be eliminated in the King County Executive's
2002 proposed budget. However, if the revised aging policies are approved, the Evergreen
Club would be funded at the current level. The Evergreen Club, Korean Seniors program
provides case management, meals and socialization for Korean seniors. The program provides
services from the Klahanee Community/Senior Center. The program also received $2,000
Special Appropriations funding from King County in 2001. The City supports this program by
providing space and other in-kind services for program operations. This program does not
receive City human services funds.
I will be at your October 8, 2001 meeting to discuss the proposed reductions to human services
programs and the draft letter to King County Executive Rom Sims from the City Council (See
Attachment 1). If you have any questions about the reductions before the meeting, please call
me at (253) 661-4039.
Committee Recommendation
1.
Move to approve the attached letter to King County regarding proposed cuts to human
services programs and forward to the full Council for approval on October 16, 2001.
@J
Move to approve the attached letter to King County regarding proposed cuts to human
services programs as modified by the Committee and forward to the full Council for
approval on October 16, 2001. Nc\ L.c4dt>.vJ ~..,.... C,,-....\<.r .\co \-t.W-r
2
'i;)-2.
ATTACHMENT 1
DRAFT
October 1, 2001
The Honorable Ron Sims
King County Executive
King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue, Room 400
Seattle, WA 98104-2312
Dear Executive Sims:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Federal Way City Council regarding your proposal for budget
reductions in 2002. While the Council recognizes the serious fiscal issues facing the County,
we are concerned about the cuts proposed for human services.
As you know, the City of Federal Way contributes financial support to agencies to help address
the human services need of Federal Way residents. Through the City's Human Services
general funds and Community Development Block Grant funds, the City contributes more than 1
million dollars annually to human services programs serving Federal Way residents. In addition
to the funding some agencies receive from the City of Federal Way, they also rely on funds
provided by the County to serve the needs of their clients. Those same agencies provide
services to a substantial number of county residents as well.
The proposed $5.4 million reduction in human services from the Current Expense Fund and the
Children and Families Commission will have a serious impact on the residents of the City of
Federal Way, especially in the provision of subsidized child care for the working poor, case
management services for the Korean elderly population, a teen crisis line and access to
information regarding available services. In addition, the proposed elimination of the Special
Appropriations program would also have serious impacts on services funded by the County and
the City of Federal Way. Services potentially impacted by elimination of the program include
basic health services for low-income residents, emergency shelter for homeless individuals and
families; youth support programs and domestic violence and sexual assault services.
The Council is particularly concerned that the proposed reductions are in conflict with the
County's human services policies. The policies indicate that funds will be used to help assure
access to basic services for those most vulnerable and most in need and provide services that
reduce the impact on the County's juvenile and adult criminal justice systems. However, the
proposed funding reductions would reduce or eliminate critical basic services that are needed to
keep individuals and families self-sufficient.
In addition, we are concerned that designating the proposed cuts based on the County's
adopted polices could unfairly affect agencies within cities because they may not primarily serve
unincorporated residents. King County residents who reside in cities provide financial support
for countywide services through the payment of county taxes and they should be provided the
DRAFT
same access to services as residents in unincorporated areas. In 2000, Federal Way residents
paid more than $20,784,769 in property, sales and other taxes to King County.
In closing, the Federal Way City Council urges you to reconsider the proposed reductions for
these critical human services. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter,
please do not hesitate to contact Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager at (253) 661-4039.
Sincerely,
Mike Park
Mayor
cc:
King County Council Members
Federal Way City Council
Federal Way Human Services Commission
David Moseley, Federal Way City Manager
Kathy McClung, Director, Community Development Services
Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES AND PUBLIC SAFETY
DATE:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
June 1, 2001
Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager
David Moseley, City Manager
2002 King County Budget - Proposed Cuts to Human Services Programs
Information Item
Background
On May 24, 2001, King County Executive Ron Sims held a meeting with representatives of
suburban cities to discuss the County's 2002 budget and his proposed reductions to human
services programs. Executive Sims noted that there is a 36 million dollar deficit in the 2002
King County Current Expense Fund budget. Increasing criminal justice demands, the
increasing cost for health care coverage and benefits, and constrained revenue growth have
contributed to this shortfall. The County also expects a 22 million dollar deficit in 2003.
Attachment 1 describes the budget reductions proposed by Executive Sims to address the
budget deficit.
Proposed Reductions to Human Services
Of the reductions proposed are 5 million dollars to the Department of Community and Human
Services and the Children and Family Commission budgets. Programs were evaluated for their
alignment with the Human Services Policy Framework adopted by the King County Council in
1999. County staff noted that the reductions proposed are 3% of the total Human Services
budget administered by the County. The County will maintain funding for the following core
programs - youth and family service network agencies, domestic violence programs, at-risk
youth and juvenile justice, and services for the homeless. Though no reductions have been
made in their aging programs budget, the County is currently reviewing their policies for aging
services, which may impact the funding for those programs. The King County Child Care
Program will be cut ($1.2 million) and closed by September 2002. Currently 17 Federal Way
families receive child care subsidies through the King County Child Care program. Attachments
2 and 3 outline the proposed reductions to specific nonprofit agency programs.
Of the nonprofit agency programs serving Federal Way residents, the following are proposed for
reductions in 2002: Child Care Resources, InfoITTlation and Referral; Crisis Clinic, Community
InfoITTlation Line and Teen Link; Evergreen Club, Korean Seniors; and the King County
Domestic Violence Coalition. Please see Attachment 2 for amount of the funding reductions to
each program.
In addition, County staff noted that the Special Program Appropriations allocated each year by
individual County Council members are not included in the proposed 2002 budget. These total
more than $1 million each year. In 2001, 20 organizations serving Federal Way received more
than $95,000. The human services agencies funded include: ACAP Courthouse Child Care
(RJC); Community Health Centers of King County; Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN);
Evergreen Club, Korean Seniors; Federal Way Boys and Girls Club; Federal Way Community
Caregiving Network, FUSION Program; Federal Way Norman Center, King County Sexual
Assault Center, Federal Way Norman Center, YMCA; Multi-Service Center, and the South King
County Youth Violence Prevention Committee. In addition to human services agencies these
funds were also allocated to service clubs, the Greater Federal Way Chamber of Commerce,
the Federal Way Historical Society and the St. Francis Hospital Foundation.
Next Steps
King County Executive Ron Sims will meet with human services agencies impacted by these
reductions on June 7, 2001. The County has stated that they will assist agencies in seeking
funding from other sources, including providing assistance with grant writing. The Executive's
budget will be forwarded to the King County Council for review in October.
City staff will forward additional information to the Council regarding reductions in human
services funding as it becomes available. King County staff are available to answer questions
regarding the proposed reductions. For more information, contact Jay Fossett, Government
Relations at (206) 296-4040 or Barbara Gletne, Director, King County Department of
Community and Human Services at (206) 296-7689.
Attachment 1
2002 Budget Proposed Reductions and Efficiencies
$36 Million Shortfall in Current Expense for 2002 - Overview
King County faces the most serious Current Expense Fund financial problem in memory. King County's
Current Expense Fund or general fund pays for our regional justice system, parks, social services and the
general government infrastructure. Increasing criminal justice demands, the increasing cost for health care
coverage and benefits, and constrained revenue growth have left us with a projected $36 million imbalance
in the 2002 budget and another $22 milIion imbalance in 2003 if we do not immediately address this issue.
The breakdown below does not add up to $36 million in reductions to the Current Expense Fund, but the
county continues to review programs, services and functions to find other efficiencies.
King County Government Reorganization Projected $13 Million Reduction
On May IS, 2001 King County Executive Ron Sims submitted an ordinance to the King County Council that
if approved, will save more than $ 13 million per year, over $S million of which is Current Expense savings.
More than 130 jobs will be eliminated. These proposed changes will combine four existing departments into
one Department of Executive Services, move the King County Parks Department into the Department of
Natural Resources, and implement a variety of other efficiencies that will assist us in dealing with the $36
million shortfall.
Human Services Projected $5 Million Reduction
The Department of Community and Human Services and the Children and Family Commission total
projected reduction is approximately $S.4 million. Programs were evaluated for their alignment along the
Human Services Policy Framework adopted by the King County Council in 1999. The County has created
the Human Services Transition Program to assist affected agencies secure funding from other sources. A
reduction of$S million in human services represents less than 3% of the total budget for human services
countywide. King County's role as a partner in regional human services remains very strong.
Arts and Heritage Projected $1. 7 Million Reduction
The King County Office of Cultural Resources is identifying ways to shift most of the arts and heritage
programs and staffing to hotel-motel tax funding and greatly reducing the current expense burden. Further,
King County is exploring ways to shift the grant dispensing and administrative functions funded by hotel-
motel tax to a newly created public development authority. This shift would generate even more reductions
from the general fund.
Law and Justice Projected $10 Million Reduction
The King County Executive is currently working with the separately elected officials (Prosecutor, District
and Superior Court Judges, Sheriff) to identify $10 million in cuts and efficiencies in the county's criminal
justice expenditures. Current expense reductions are also being identified in the Executive criminal justice
agencies. Efficiencies in this area will not affect public safety in King County.
Public Health Projected $1 Million Reduction.
The Public Health Department was asked to identify $1 million in targeted reductions from their current
expense budget. They are currently reviewing core programs that rely on current expense monies.
Cities Affected by CSD Human Services Reductions
Attachment 2
CSD funding as % of
Proposed reduction budget (italic =full agency
County wide
Subregion/other entity
"~~III,;V IVI ..uu.. vuoOç, v".ç~ "'U~' U"Çv,çu ~w...w w"w'ww
Auburn Youth Resources: Rural Outreach 28,714 1.0% Auburn Auburn School District
Bellevue Familv YMCA: Capital Proiect 100,000 Capital proiect
Bovs & Girls Club-Rainier Vista 43,488 5.0% Seattle ¡ Boulevard Park
Catholic Community"Svcs: Legai Svcs Low
Income Tenants 9,096 3.0% Yes
Child Care Resources: CarinQ Partnerships 41,719 1.0% Yes
Child Care Resources: Child Care Referral &
Svcs 187,204 6.0% Yes
Chinese Info & Svc Ctr: Familv & Youth Svcs 75,429 7.0% Seattle Yes
Crisis Clinic: CommunitY Info Line 60,000 3.0% Yes
Crisis Clinic-Teen Link 34,286 2.0% Yes
Eastside Leaal Assistance Proaram 24,211 8.0% Eastside cities
Eastside Literacv 12,979 2.0% Bellevue Eastside cities
Elderhealth Northwest: Elder Friends 17,143 47.0% Yes
Evemreen Club - Korean Srs 25,911 61.0% Federal Way
Food Lifeline 52,000 0.2% Shoreline Yes
Fremont Public Assoc-Aoina Services 99,000 82.0% Shoreline
Friends of Youth: Sno Valley Youth Ctr 16,255 3.0% Carnation Sno-VallevCities
Issaquah Chamber of Commerce 25,000 not known Issaquah
KC Domestic Violence Coalition 25,000 25.0% Yes
Kent Youth and Family Services: Housing Project
Outreach 40,207 18.7% ' Kent
Kinq Co. DCFM (Winter Shelter) 24,015 County AQency Seattle
Lakeland Senior Center 25,000 24.0% South 1-5 corridor
Maple Valiev Communitv Ctr: Aaina Proaram 44,381 41.0% Maale Valley
Neiqhborhood House: Nutrition Education 29,913 17.0% SeaWelWhite Center
Northshore Senior Center" 30,120 12.0% Bothell South Snohomish CountY
Page1af2
4:20 PM 5/24/01
Cities Affected by CSD Human Services Reductions
CSD funding as % of
Proposed reduction budget (italic =(ull agency
Countywide
Subregioniother entity
Moe,,<;y IVI ~VV~ Duooen ,,¡ues most aTTeCteO service aTTectea
Northshore Youth and Family Services: Bright Bothell, Shoreline;
BeQinninQs ProQram 31,562 4.0% Lake Forest Park Northshore school district
Ruth Dykeman Childrens Center: Project Look 49,267 8.0%
Shoreline Adult Day Health' 33,387 20.0% Shoreline
,
Sno-ValleY.Senior Center 157,000 100% - cacital project Carnation Upper Valley
Southeast Senior Center Adult Day Health' 20,000 12.0% Seattle
Burien, SeaTac, &
Southwest KC Chamber of Commerce 25,000 9.0% Tukwila
Sports Eyents Council 50,000 unknown
Unemployment Law Proiect 25,000 14.0% Yes
. ..nlor programs a"lIated with SenIor Services of King County
Note: ExecuUve and Council approval of proposed revisions to the funding polley for services to seniors may change the proposed reductions for selected aging and adult day health programs.
Page 2 of 2
4:20 PM 5/24/01
Auacnment ;j
CHILDREN AND FAMILY COMMISSION
IMPACT
Agency Reduction % of Budget Cities Impacted Sub-Region
Consejo $30,000 40% Seattle , Seattle
Youth Involvement
Hopelink $45,000 20% Redmond East Urban
($25,000 remaining) Bellevue
Kent Youth Family Services $92,000 30% Kent South Urban
Lighthouse
Lutheran Social Services $75,000 50% Seattle Seattle
Cascade Family Center
YES $44,250 64% Redmond & Kirkland East Urban
Family Net ($44,250 remaining)
YES $44,640 42% Bellevue & Kirkland East Urban
VOICE ($99,360 remaining)
Southwest Youth and Family $50,000 20% Seattle Seattle
Services
Youth Involvement Program $72,500 $100 Internal Program Internal Program
CHILREN AND FAMILY COMMISION
PROPOSED REDUCTIONS
2002
BUDGET
Background
The King County Children and Family Commission (CFC) fund 21 community-based agencies to provide "best practice" or "promising practice"
demonstration projects that service children and families throughout King County. The total CX budget for these programs is $2,179,065.
The CFC funds projects in three specific program areas; Healthy Families/Early Childhood, Family Support, and Safe Communities. All of the
awards are granted through a competitive process and extend up to five years. The purpose of the awards is to create systemic change in the
communities by providing money, technical assistarice, and a strong evaluation component. All projects are required to generate a 25% cash
match; projects are monitored armually, and fonnally evaluated. The evaluation occurs during the last 18 months of the contract and measures the
child/family, community, and system impact. All projects are considered "best practice" or "promising practice" and what is learned from the
evaluations is shared with other funders, communities, and providers.
A small number of the CFC projects have been funded beyond the demonstration phase because of the significant impact and. results that were
documented through the evaluation. Programs funded beyond the demonstration phase are evaluated every 3-4 years to continually measure
results and to assure the project has not been compromised or no longer effective.
Methodology for Proposed Reductions
In the process to identify potential programs for reduction the criteria used to measure each program area and specifc projects was the Human
Service Framework Policies and the Recommendations Report for 2001-2003.
+ Serve unincorporated King County and it's residents.
+ Serve the most in need.
+ Support projects that impact the reduction of criminal justice system
+ Support projects that are research based and are identified to be "best practice."
SEP-Z6-Z001 05 :43PU
FROM-DCHS DIRECTOR
206-2Q6-5260
l;=":"~~;;'t
\>.: jM
'~'-'. di
,<:.~r
King County Executive
RON SIMS
ATTACHMENT 3
August 9, 2001
The Honorable Michael Park
City of Federal Way
33530 1st Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6210
Dear Mayor Park:
King County is facing our greatest challenge in recent times - a projected $36 million
. budget shonfall in the Current Expense Fund for 2002. Due to incorporarions and
annexations, King County government has seen Ìls local tax base shrink dran1atically
over the last ten years. We have no choice but to reduce programs and services to bring
expenses in line with projecIed revenues. As a first step, I looked for internal efficiencies
and reduction of administrative costs through the reorganization of several executive
departments and functions. 111is reorganization, if approved by the King County
Council, win save more than $13 million per year. I am also proposing a $12 million
reduction in the 2002 law and justice budget, and reductions in other service areas,
Ìncluding an approximately $5 million cut to human serVices.
The King County Framework Policies for Human Senlices adopted by the King County
Council in 1999 provides policy guidance for detennining funding priorities for human
services. Given the magnitude ofthe shortfall, an across the board reduction to.human
services would have been devastating to all of our programs and would have undennined
our effectiveness in all of these areas. Instead, after careful examination of our priority
populations, market share, and other [acmrs detailed in the Framework Policies, the
decision was made to preserve core funding for several of our programs serving t4e most
vulnerable and low-income populations - including youth and family service networks,
aging programs, juvenile justice, domestic violence/sexual assault, and low-income/
special needs housing.
Fiscal realiues force us to make difficult budget choices. Included in the programs slated
for reductions are ones tJ1at I have personally championed over the years, including the
King County Child Care Program. King County will continue funding for Child Care
Resources, this area's child care resource and referral agency. We will continue to
provide child care subsidies in 2002 for culTently enrolled eligible parents living in King
County's unincorporated areas, and continue to ensure that the approved child care sites
used by children in our program meet standards of quality. However, as of January I,
2002 we will no longer be able to fund child care subsidies for resident~. of incorporated
cities.
I<ING COUNTY COURTHOUSE 516 THIRD AVENUE, ROOM 400 SEA TILE. WA 98104-3271
<206) 296-'!O'IQ 296-t1194 FAX 296-0200 TOD E-mail: ron.sims@metrolœ..gov
09/26101 WED 17: 46 ITX/RX NO 83611
SEP726-Z001 05:43PM
FROM-DCHS DIRECTOR
206-2Q6-S260
T-058
P.OO3/010
F-336
.'
The Honorable Michael Park
August 9,2001 - Page 2
King County will continue to serve enrolled families in those cities that choose to
contribute the cost of providing child care services to their residents. The attached
document provides surrullary infonnation on the children from local cities CUITently
emolled in the King County child care subsidy program, and the projected costs to each
city to continue child care subsidy assistance to their residents. The estimates are based
on the assumption of providing services to at least 125 children; costs to maintain the
program would have to be negotiated separately if enrollment is significantly lower. If
you are interested in pursuing this option, please call Sadikifu Akina-James, Community
Services Division Manager, King County Deparunent of Community and Human
Services at (206) 296-7683. We would like to hear from you by September 12,2001 in
order to proceed with our final cost analysis and notification process to affected families.
The Framework Policies dcfme regional human services as a shared responsibility
among state and local goverriments . including the cities of King County - and the private
sector. Since I first announced my proposed reductions, T have convened several
meetings with human service providers, suburban cities representatives, elected officials,
and others to discuss how we can work together to address the fiscal realities of this year
and me forecast we see for ù1e future. It is my hope to build partnerships with local
government, notjusl to address me child care funding issue, but to seek ways to stabilize
and sustain human services throughoUt King County. As a key panner in the broader
human service community, I would welcome your assistance in these efforts.
I appreciate your support and unders!anding of me difficu]¡ budge! issues we face in King
County. If you have any questions about the 2002 budget situation, or the child care
program specifically, please don't hesitate to contact me.
~
King County Executive
cc:
Barbara J. GJelne, Director, Department of Community and Human Services
enc.
09/26/01 WED 17; 46
(TX/RX NO 83611
.,
~
m
i
Illustration of city contributions necessary to maintain child care services to current enrollees*
~
~
;.:;
;g
0
co
"-
too
co
"-
0
...
Subsidy cost Non-subsidy cost Tota]
Avg. monthly Avg. monthly Sllbtotal
Sllbtolal provider and Avg. monthly Training and non-subsidy Total monthly Totnl
Number of Avg. monthly sllbsidy parelil services admin T A cost cos, cost for al1 annual
Children subsid\' Der child Der motll/¡ cost ner child cost Der child oer chHd pa mol/I/¡ citY! enrollees cost
Auburn 1~ $ 328.50 $ 4.599 S 30.00 S 17.72 S 22.37 $ 981.26 :;; 5,580 .$ 66,963
Be!levue ~l $ 328.50 S /3,469 S 30.00 S 17.72 :;; 22.37 $ 2.873.69 :;; 16,3~2 .$ 196,106
Bothell I S 328.50 S 329 S 30.00 :;; 17.72 :;; 22.37 S 70.09 $ 399 $ 4,783
Burien 6 S 328.50 :;; 1.971 S 30.00 :;; 17.72 :;; 22.37 S 420.54 :;; 2,392 $ 28,698
Covington I S 328.50 $ 329 :;; 30.00 :;; 17.72 .$ 22.37 $ 70.09.$ 399 S 4,783
Des Moines 3 S 328.50 $ 986 :;; 30.00 :;; 17.72 $ 22.37 $ 2/0.27 S 1,196 $ 14,349
Enumclaw 1 $ 328.50 $ 329 :;; 30.00 S 17.72 S 22.37 $ 70.09:;; 399 .$ 4,783
Fall Cil}' :;; 328.50 $ - .$ 30.00 S 17.72 S 22.37 :;; - :;; .$ -
Pederal Way 24 :;; 328.50 $ 7,884 S 30.00 :;; 17.72 .$ 22.37 $ 1,682.16 $ 9,566 S 114,794
Hobart .$ 328.50 :;; - :;; 30.00 :;; 17.72 :;; 22.37 $ - .$ - S -
Issaquah 1 $ 328.50 $ 329 :;; 30.00 :;; 17.72 $ 22.37 S 70.09 S 399 .$ 4,783
Kenmore S 328.50 $ - $ 30.00 S 17.72 S 22.37 $ - S - .$ -
Kent 3~ .$ 328.50 $ 11.169 $ 30.00 S 17.72 S 22.37 :;; 2,383.06 S 13,552 .$ 162,625
Kirkland 11 .$ 328.50 $ 3,614 S 30.00 :;; 17.72 :;; 22.37 :;; 770.99 :;; ~,J84 $ 52,614
Maple Valley 1 :;; 328.50 $ 329 S 30.00 :;; 17.72 :;; 22.37 :;; 70.09 :;; 399 S 4,783
New Castle 1 :;; 328.50 S 329 $ 30.00 $ 17.72 :;; 22.37 $ 70.09 :;; 399 S 4,783
North Bend 2 :;; 328.50 S 657 :;; 30.00 $ 17.72 :;; 22.37 $ /40.18.$ 797 S 9,566
Pacific 2 :;; 328.50 $ 657 .$ 30.00 $ 17.72 $ 22.37 $ /40.18.$ 797 S 9,566
Redmond 1 $ 328.50 $ 329 $ 30.00 $ 17.72 S 22.37 $ 70.09 S 399 S 4,783
Renton ~5 S 328.50 $ /4,783 $ 30.00 S 17.72 $ 22.37 $ 3,/54.05 $ 17,937 $ 215,239
Sea Tae 4 S 328.50 $ 1.3/4 $ 30.00 S 17.72 $ 22.37 :;; 280.36 .$ 1,594 $ 19,132
Seattle 19 $ 328.50 $ 6,242 S 30.00 $ 17.72 :;; 22.37 $ 1,331.71 $ 7,573 S 90,879
Shoreline 9 $ 328.50 $ 2,957 $ 30.00 .$ 17.72 $ 22.37 $ 630.81 $ 3,587 S 43,048
Snoqualmie 2 $ 328.50 $ 657 :;; 30.00 :;; 17.72 $ 22.37 $ 140.18 S 797 $ 9,566
Tukwila 8 $ 328.50 S 2,628 $ 30.00 $ 17.72 S 22.37 :;; 560.72 :;; 3,189 .$ 38,265
Woodin\'iJ1e 2 :;; 328.50 :;; 657 :;; 30.00 $ 17.72 S 22.37 $ 140./8 $ 797 .$ 9,566
:a
~
~
~
~
"f
~
'"
'"
m
n
~
~
~
I
~
...
....
....
'"
¡
~
~
~
0>
...
co
...
"" Cos!.'! shown are based on enrollment of al least 125 incorpornled area children
* Assumes a conslant enrollment. annual costs will be less ifnahtral attrition is not replaced
~
8/8/01
MEETING DATE:
October 16,2001
ITEM# ~ )
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Heritage Woods Park Play Structure
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[8]
D
D
D
CONSENT
ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
D RESOLUTION
D STAFF REPORT
D PROCLAMATION
D STUDY SESSION
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: October 8, 2001 Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee Memorandum
SUMMARY / BACKGROUND: As part of the 2001/2002 Budget process, Council approved $32,000 for play
equipment for the newly developed Heritage Woods Neighborhood Park. Heritage Woods Neighborhood Park was
constructed as part of the developer's open space requirement when developing the Heritage Woods sub-division.
Heritage Woods Neighborhood Park is located at 28200 24th Place South (see attached map).
Thursday, June 28th the Parks and Recreation Commission hosted an open house meeting with the residents of the
Heritage Woods Home Owner's Association. The purpose of the meeting was to determine the preference of residents
with regard to the design and construction of a children's play area in Heritage Woods Park. The residents voted on a
variety of play elements, which they preferred for the play structure. Staff subsequent1y used this information to prepare
the bid for playground equipment vendors. Three companies submitted proposals for the project. The three proposals
were reviewed and discussed at the Thursday, September 6th, 2001 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
Numerous residents from Heritage Woods Homeowners Association attended the commission meeting and voiced their
comments. The three proposals were discussed and ultimately the commission voted unanimously to recommend
Playground Environments International as the company to supply the playground equipment for the Heritage Woods
Playground project. The itemized cost for the structure is as follows:
Playground Environments Structure #38-2294.. ..................... ... $18,368.00
Freight............................................................................$2,700.00
61 Cu.Yds. Woodcarpet...........
....................
......$ 1,495.00
2-Day Site Supervision for Community Installation.................... ....$ 1,550.00
Washington State Sale Tax.. ......... ...... ............... ........ ...... .......$ 2,073.72
Total:..
.................... ....................................$26,186.72
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: (I) approval of (I) approval of Playground Environments
International as the playground equipment manufacturer (R&R Construction - Supplier / Installer) for the Heritage Woods
Park Playground Project, in the amount of $26,186.72 (2) authorize staff to proceed with the site preparation work in the
amount of$ 5,813.28 for a total project cost of$32,000 and Move to full council on October 16, 2001 for final approval.
and Move to full council on October 16,2001 for final approval.
PROPOSED COUMCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to accept (I) approval of Playground
Environments International as the playground equipment manufacturer (R&R Construction - Supplier / Installer) for the
Heritage Woods Park Playground Project, in the amount of $26,186.72 (2) authorize staff to proceed with the site
preparation work in the amount of $ 5,813.28 for a total project cost of $32,000.
APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER:
~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
II APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
MOVED TO SECOND READING (ORDINANCES ONLY)
COUNCIL BILL #
1sT READING
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
5.1
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date:
September 24, 2001
To:
Parks, Recreation, Hnman Services & Pnblic Safety Council Committee
From: Kurt Reuter, Parks Maintenance Superintendent 15
Jon Jainga, Parks Planning and Development Mana. ,.
Via: David M~anager
Subject: Heritage Woods Park Playground Equipment Vendor
Backeround:
As part ofthe 2001/2002 Budget process, Council approved $32,000 for play equipment for the newly
developed Heritage Woods Neighborhood Park. Heritage Woods Neighborhood Park was constructed as
part of the developer's open space requirement when developing the Heritage Woods sub-division.
Heritage Woods Neighborhood Park is located at 28200 24th Place South (see attached map).
Thursday, June 28th the Parks and Recreation Commission hosted an open house meeting with the
residents of the Heritage Woods Home Owner's Association. The purpose of the meeting was to
determine the preference of residents with regard to the design and construction of a children's play area
in Heritage Woods Park. The residents voted on a variety of play elements, which they preferred for the
play structure. Staff subsequently used this information to prepare the bid for playground equipment
vendors. Three companies submitted proposals for the project The three proposals were reviewed and
discussed at the Thursday, September 6th, 2001 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. Numerous
residents from Heritage Woods Homeowners Association attended the commission meeting and voiced
their comments. The three proposals were discussed and ultimately the commission voted unanimously to
recommend Playground Environments International as the company to supply the playground
equipment for the Heritage Woods Playground project The itemized cost for the structure is as follows:
Playground Environments Structure #38-2294............................ $18,368.00
Freight...........................................................................$2,700.00
61 Cu.Yds. Woodcarpet........................................................$1,495.00
2-Day Site Supervision for Community Installation........................$ 1,550.00
Washington State Sale Tax.....................................................$ 2,073.72
Total:..............................................................................$26,186.72
Committee Recommendation:
Recommend (1) approval of Playground Environments International as the playground equipment
manufacturer (R&R Construction - Supplier I Installer) for the Heritage Woods Park Playground Project,
in the amount of $26,186.72 (2) authorize staff to proceed with the site preparation work in the amount
of $ 5,813.28 for a total project cost of $32,000 and Move to full council on October 16,2001 for final
approval.
Note: Funding Source, 2001 PRCS CIP Budget - Neighborhood Parks Account
T-~
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
ITEM#
)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Sacajawea Field Lights
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
¡g¡ CONSENT
0 ORDINANCE
i I BUSINESS
0 HEARING
0 FYI
0 RESOLUTION
0 STAFF REPORT
0 PROCLAMATION
0 STUDY SESSION
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: October 8, 2001 Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee Memorandum
SUMMARY I BACKGROUND: As part of the 200112002 Budget process, Council approved $75,000 for four
additional field lights to be installed at the Sacajawea Sports Field. This is phase II of the Sacajawea Sports Field
Improvement Project. Phase I was the install of the synthetic field turffor youth soccer and football. The Federal Way
Soccer Association would also be working together with the city as a partner, contributing funds toward the project. The
field lights would add an additional field time for both practice and games. This is equivalent of adding another sports
field to our recreational soccer need.
Staff requested cost estimate from sports lighting vendors I manufacturers. Musco Lighting was the only vendor that
could meet the specifications on product warranty. Musco is still the only lighting manufacturer, which has a volunteer
installation program where groups can assist with the install of the product, and in return, contributes a credit for the labor
provided. Musco is also the only manufacturer that provides a 10-year warranty on their light system. The other vendors
offer a one-year warranty with their product. Musco Lighting provided the lowest responsive cost estimate.
The cost for the project is as follows:
Lighting System (Four Pole LSS2 System)
Electrical
WSST
Total
$60,000
$27,500
$ 7,525
$95,025
Funding Source:200l PRCS CIP Budget - Sport Field Improve. Account $75,000
Federal Way Soccer Association Partnership $15,000
Carry over balance from Sacajawea Phase I Project (includes a 5% contingency) $10,000
Total: $100,000
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval of the Sacajawea Field Lights Project and
authorize staff to proceed with the site preparation for a total project funding cost of $1 00,000 and Move to full council on
October 16, 200 I for final approval.
PROPOSED COUMCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to accept the Sacajawea Field Lights
Project and authorize staff to proceed with the site preparation for a total project funding cost of $1 00,000
APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER:
...~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
I I APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
MOVED TO SECOND READING (ORDINANCES ONLY)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST READING
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
5.H
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date:
September 24, 2001
To:
Parks, Recreation, Hnman Services & Public Safety Couucil Committee
From:
Jou Jainga, Parks Planning and Development Manager
Via:
Subject:
Back~ronnd:
As part of the 2001/2002 Budget process, Council approved $75,000 for four additional field lights to be
installed at the Sacajawea Sports Field. This is phase II of the Sacajawea Sports Field Improvement
Project. Phase I was the install of the synthetic field turffor youth soccer and football. The Federal Way
Soccer Association would also be working together with the city as a partner, contributing funds toward
the project. The field lights would add an additional field time for both practice and games. This is
equivalent of adding another sports field to our recreational soccer need.
Staff requested cost estimate from sports lighting vendors I manufacturers. Musco Lighting was the only
vendor that could meet the specifications on product warranty. Musco is stil1 the only lighting
manufacturer, which has a volunteer installation program where groups can assist with the install of the
product, and in return, contributes a credit for the labor provided. Musco is also the only manufacturer
that provides a I O-year warranty on their light system. The other vendors offer a one-year warranty with
their product. Musco Lighting provided the lowest responsive cost estimate.
The cost for the project is as follows:
Lighting System (Four Pole LSS2 System)
Electrical
WSST
Total
$60,000
$27,500
$ 7,525
$95,025
Funding Source:
2001 PRCS CIP Budget - Sport Field Improve. Account
Federal Way Soccer Association Partnership
Carry over balance ITom Sacajawea Phase I Project
(includes a 5% contingency)
Total:
$75,000
$15,000
$ 10,000
$ 100,000
Committee Recommendation:
Recommend approval of the Sacajawea Field Lights Project and authorize staff to proceed with the site
preparation for a total project funding cost of $100,000 and Move to full council on October 16, 2001 for
final approval.
Note: Funding Source, 2001 PRCS CIP Budget -Sports Field Improvement Account
---
tj-.:J-
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
ITEM# ~
w_-----------~-~---~-----~-----~--~-~--- --~---------~---~-----------------------~---------------------------------------------------------.-
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: BIENNIAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS & PROPERTY TAX RATE
~A T:::::~T --~--:::~:~:-------------~B::~:~::::T:
0 RESOLUTION 181 PUBLIC HEARING Expenditure Amt.:
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 OTHER Contiugeucy Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: none
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The City Council is conducting a preliminary public hearing to receive citizen comment
on the biennial budget adjustments and property tax rate. The City Manager will present the proposed biennial budget
adjustments to the City Council during the special meeting at 6:00 p.m.
._._--_._-----------~---_.__._._---_.__.__._._._----------------~~-----_._._._--_._._.__._--_._._--_._.u._.-_._--~------~-~_._._--------~---------
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a
-.-.--.-.-.-.-.--.------.-----.--------------------.----.-..
-- -- --.----.------------.------------.------.-.-----.--.-----.
PROPOSED MOTION: No action is req~ired at this time
;,~~:¡~ - - -
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1sT reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/1 0/2001
MEETING DATE:
October ]6,200]
ITEM# :YZZ:--
CITY OFFEDE1~ALWAY-------~._-
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
0 CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
181 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: ]) Draft Adoption Ordinance; 2) Exhibit A - October 9, 200], Memorandum to the City Council;
Exhibit B - September 25, 200], Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe); 3) Exhibit A of
Exhibit B - Maps of Site Specific Requests; and 4) Exhibit C - September 25, 200], Staff Report to the LUTC (Please
note that Exhibits 1-4 to the September 25, 2001, Staff Report are available in the Council Conference Room).
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of ]995, and amended the
plan in December of ]998 and September 2000. There were originally eight site-specific requests for amendments to the
existing comprehensive plan designations. Requests # I (Nguyen), 2 (Goodwin), 5 (Chong Nam Vi), 7 (Smith), and 8
(Hanson) are being forwarded for Council action. Request #3 (Jackson) was withdrawn on September 27, 2001, and
Requests #4 (Kitts Corner) and 6 (Weyerhaeuser) will be presented to the LUTC and City Council at a later date in order
to allow staff to prepare development agreements related to these requests. A description ofthe five requests being
forwarded for action can be found in Exhibit A - October 9, 200], Memorandum to the City Council and their locations
are shown in Exhibit A of B.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's
recommendation during a public meeting on October I, 200]. The LUTC concurred with the Planning Commission's
recommendation to approve Requests #] (Goodwin), 2 (Nguyen), 7 (Smith), and 8 (Hanson), and deny Request #5 (Chong
Nam Vi). At that meeting, the LUTC made a motion to forward the comprehensive plan amendments to the full Council for
first reading on October] 6, 200] .
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the ordinance adopting amendments to the comprehensive plan to second
reading and enactment on November 6, 200 I"
-~
"""'..""'~'~'~""-""""-".,.~..,.".,_...",...........
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDffiEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinonces only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
J-p{
REVISED - 0511012001
1:101COMPPLANICity Council1101601 CC Cover Agenda.docl1010912001 3:19 PM
ORDINANCE NO.
DRAf1
!J/1(tJ/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS
TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT
COMPREHENSIVEPLAN AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTSTO
THE CITY'S ZONING MAP.
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or
"GMA") requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use
element (including a land use map), a housing element, a capital facilities plan element, a utilities
element and a transportation element (including transportation system map[s]); and
WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City ofF ederal Way to adopt developmentregulations
implementing its Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its Comprehensive Plan with land use map
(the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map
implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the Comprehensive Plan and
zoning map on December 23, 1998, and September 14, 2000; and
WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subject to
continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and
WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuantto
Article IX, Chapter 22 ofthe Federal Way City Code (FWCC); and
ORD#
,PAGE 1
WHEREAS, in September2000, the City ofF ederal Way accepted applications for site-specific
changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map, and considered amendments to the
Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map; and
WHEREAS, on July 4, 2001, the City SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on the proposed site-specific changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's
zoning map; and
WHEREAS, the proposed site-specific changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's
zoning map address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the Growth Management Act; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council
committees, and full City Council has received, discussed, and considered the testimony, written
comments, and material ITom the public, as follows:
1. The City's Planning Commission considered the requests for site-specific
changes to the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map, and considered the
proposed amendments, at public hearings held on July 18,2001, and September 19,
2001, following which it approved and recommended adoption of certain of the
requested site-specific map changes and denial of others;
2. The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City
Council considered the requested site-specific changes to the Plan's land use map and
the City's zoning map on October 1, 2001, following which it recommended
adoption of certain of the requested site-specific map changes and denial of others;
and
ORD#
, PAGE 2
3. The full City Council considered the matter at its meetings on October 16,
2001, and November 6, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt certain of the requested site-specific changes to
the Plan's land use map and the City's zoning map.
Now, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, does hereby
ordain as follows:
Section I. Findings.
A. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan land use map, set forth in Exhibit
A attached hereto, are compatible with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods, and will
not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes or wetlands, or the physical environment in general.
They will allow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and with the
Plan's land use element household and job projections, and/or will allow reasonable use of property
subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. They therefore bear a
substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare, are in the best interest of the residents of
the City, and are consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide
Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan.
B. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Map set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, are
consistent with the applicable provisions ofthe Comprehensive Plan and the Comprehensive Plan
land use map proposed to be amended in Section 2 below, bear a substantial relation to public health,
safety, and welfare, and are in the best interest of the residents of the City.
ORD#
, PAGE 3
Section 2. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments Adoption The 1995 City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998 and 2000, including its land use element map,
copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby are and shall be amended as set
forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. A copy of Exhibit A is on file with the Office of the City Clerk
and are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full.
Section 3. Zoning Map Amendments Adoption. The 1996 City of Federal Way Official
Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998 and 2000, is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A, a
copy of which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk and which documents are hereby
incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full.
Section 4. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Sections 2 and 3
above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70A and 35A.63 RCW, and pursuant to
FWCC Section 22-541.
Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and
severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this
ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect
the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or
circumstances.
Section 6. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and 1996
Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998 and 2000, shall remain in force and effect until the
amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance.
ORO#
, PAGE 4
Section 7. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date
of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from
and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this
,2001.
day of
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Mayor, Mike Park
ATTEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
ApPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, Bob C. Sterbank
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE No.
I:IOICOMPPLAN\Œy CouncillAdopt;on Ordinance.docilO/O9/2001 2:27 PM
ORD#
, PAGE 5
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
October 9,2001
To:
Mayor and City Council Members
VIA:
David ~anager
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services ~~
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner ~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
2000 Comprehensive Plan Update - Land Useffransportation Committee
Recommendation on Site-Specific Requests #1, 2, 5, 7, and 8
MEETING DATE:
October 16, 2001
A.
BACKGROUND
;;
The Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTe) discussed the Planning Commission's
recommendation during a public meeting on October I, 2001. The LUTC concurred with the Planning
Commission'srecommendationto approve Requests #1 (Goodwin), 2 (Nguyen), 7 (Smith), and 8
(Hanson) and deny Request #5 (Chong Nam Vi). At that meeting, the LUTC made a motion to
forward the comprehensive plan amendments to the full Council for first reading on October 16,
2001.
The following section, RECOMMENDATION, summarizes the five site-specific reques!~, giving the
recommendation on each.
B.
RECOMMENDATION
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #1 - GOODWIN DENTAL CLINIC
File#:
Parcel:
Location:
CPA99-0011
332204-9109
North of288th Street and east of Pacific Highway {Page 2, Exhibit A
of E)
0.48 acres
OHM Consulting Engineers on behalf of the owners of the Goodwin
Dental Clinic
Thomas Goodwin & Carl Jacobsen (Goodwin Dental Clinic)
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
EXHIBIT~
PAGE-LOF -4-
Request:
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Multifamily and RM 1800 (one unit per 1,800 square feet) to
Community Business and BC zoning
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request
LUTC
Recommendation:
Approve the request
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #2 - JOHN NGUYEN
File Number:
Parcel:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request:
00-104891-00 UP
082104-9138
South of South 308" Street and west of 14" Avenue South (Page 3,
Exhibit A of B)
0.71 acres/31,050 square feet
John Nguyen
Same
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of the
Lake Apartments from Professional Office (PO) to Multifamily and RM
1800 (one unit per 1,800 square feet)
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request
LUTC
Recommendation:
Approve the request
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #5 - CHONG NAM YI
File Number:
Parcel:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Agent:
00-104875-00 UP
202104-9121; 202014-9170; 202104-9171; 202104-9172; 202104-9167;
02104-9168; 202104-9125 & 202104-9169
North of South 344" Street and west of Pacific Highway South (Page 5,
Exhibit A of B)
5.17 acres
Chong Nam Yi
Harry Horan
Page 2
EXHŒ~)üT A
PAG E-.2.. OF 4-
Owners:
Request:
Please refer to the following table
Parcel # Owner Acres
202104-9121 Chong Nam Yi 1.43
202104-9\70 James Mackmer 0.68
202104-9171 Abt Towing 0.34
202104-9\72 Abt Towing 0.34
202104-9\67 James Mackmer 0.76
202104-9\68 Safe-I-Grate Inc. 0.38
202104-9\25 Richard lo Degrout 0.38
202104-9\69 B.lo Frease 0.86
Total 5.\7
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be)
Recommendation: Do not approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Do not approve the request
LUTC
Recommendation: Do not approve the request
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #7 - JOHN SMITH
;"
File Number:
Parcel:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Agent:
Owner:
Request:
00-104441-00 UP
726120-0060
East of 33n1 Place South in East Campus (Page 6. Exhibit A of B)
3.1 acres
John Smith
Harry Horan
Rachel Smith
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Single Family High Density Residential and RS 9.6 to Of !ice Park (OP)
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request
LUTC
Recommendation:
Approve the request
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #8 - RiCHARD HANSON
File Number:
Parcel:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
00-104224-00 UP
302104-9033
South of proposed Silverwood Subdivision, west of9<h Avenue SW
(Page 7, Exhibit A of B)
15.46 acres
Richard Hanson
Page 3
E~n~P'l'V- A
P"GE-3-0F -4--
Agent:
Owner:
Request:
De-En Lang, Subdivision Management
Richard Hanson
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Single Family Medium Density Residential/RS 15.0 to Single Family
High Density Residential/RS 9.6
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request.
LUTC
Recommendation: Approve the request
c.
COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report,
and at its discretion holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote
of its total membership choose one of the following options:
I. Approve the proposal by ordinance;
2. Modify and approve the proposal by ordinance;
3. Disapprove the proposal by resolution; or
4. Refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this occurs, the
City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission shall report to the
City Council on the proposal.
Attached:
Exhibit B - September 25,2001, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee
Exhibit A ofB - Composite Map and Maps of Each Request
Exhibit C - September 25,2001 Staff Report to the LUTC
(Please note that Exhibits 1-4 to the September 25,2001, Staff Report are available in
the Council Conference Room).
1:\OICOMPPLAN\City Council\lO1601 Cover Memo to CCdocll 01091200 I 3:02 PM
Page 4
r"'.. . "... "-U ~. . r, T A..
1: ,: !t;:j, 11
PAGE-Lf-°F~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
September 25, 2001
To:
FROM:
Dean McColgan, Chair
Land Useffransportation Committee (LUTC)
David ~~anager
Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner ~
~
VIA:
SUBJECT:
2000 Comprehensive Plan Update - Planning Commission Recommendation on
Site-Specific Requests #1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8
MEETING DATE:
October 1,2001
A.
BACKGROUND
Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of 1995, and updated the plan in
December of 1998 and September 2000. As part of this present update (the 2001 Amendment
Process), there are eight site-specific requests for amendments to the existing comprehensive plan
designations. The attached staff report includes six of the eight site-specific requests (#1, 2, 3, 5, 7,
and 8). Requests #4 and 6 will be presented to the Land Useffransportation Committee at a later
date in order to allow staff to prepare development agreements related to these requests. Locations
of all requests are shown on Exhibit A. A description of the six requests can be found in Exhibit 1.
Pages 9-25 of the attached staff report.
Individual parcel requests for changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map are incorporated into the
comprehensive plan update. If any requests for comprehensive plan amendments were granted,
corresponding zoning changes would be made concurrently. This Update does not include any
proposed changes to the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Text changes will be done as part of the
2002 Update, which will be the Five-Year Update. The deadline for submitting requests for the
2002 Comprehensive Plan Update is September 30, 200l.The deadline for King County cities to
complete the Five-Year Update of the Comprehensive Plan is September 2002.
B.
PROPOSAL
Following is a summary of the six-site specific requests contained in the staff report (numbers 4 and
6 are not listed as they will be presented at a later date):
EXHIBIT ---3--
PAGE-LOF3
I) File No. CPA99-0011- Request from DMB Consulting Engineers on behalf of the owners of
the Goodwin Dental Clinic to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 0.48
acres located north of South 288th Street and east of Pacific Highway South from Multifamily
and RM 1800 (one unit per 1,800 square feet) to Community Business and BC.
2) File No. 00-104891-00 UP - Request from John Nguyen to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of 0.71 acres located south of South 308th Street and west of 14th
Avenue South from Professional Office and PO to Multifamily and RM 1800 (one unit per
1,800 square feet).
3) File No. CPA99-0014 - Request from Jerry Jackson on behalf of himself and others for a
City of Federal Way Office Park comprehensive plan designation and OP zoning
associated with annexation 000.19 acres located north ofSW 320th Street and east ofI-5.
The property presently has a King County Comprehensive Plan Designation of
Commercial Outside of Center and Urban Residential (4-12 dwelling units per acre) and
zoning of Office and R-4 (Residential, four units per acre).
5) File No. 00-104875-00 UP - Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and
zoning of 5.17 acres located north of South 344th Street and west of Pacific Highway South
from Business Park and BP to Community Business and BC.
7) File No. 00-104441-00 UP - Request from John Smith to change the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of3.1 acres located east of 33" Place South in East Campus from
Single Family High Density Residential and RS 9.6 (one unit per 9,600 square feet) to
Office Park and OP.
8) File No. 00-104224-00 UP - Request from Richard Hanson to change the comprehensive
plan designation and zoning of 15.46 acres located south of the proposed Silverwood
Subdivision, west of 9th Avenue SW from Single Family Medium Density Residential and
RS 15.0 (one unit per 15,000 square feet) to Single Family High Density Residential and
RS 9.6 (one unit per 9.600 square feet).
c.
RECOMMENDA nON
The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on July 18,2001 and September 19, 2001.
After conclusion of the public hearings, the Planning Commission, by a majority vote of the entire
membership, recommended that the City Council take the following action:
I. Approve the requested comprehensive plan designations for Site Specific Requests # I
(Goodwin), #2 (John Nguyen), #7 (John Smith), and #8 (Hanson).
2. Approve the requested comprehensive plan designations for Site Specific Request #3 (Jackson)
on condition that all restoration work on the site as approved under King County Sensitive
Areas Permit #LOOCGOI8, be completed, inspected, and approved by King County prior to City
Council action on the 2001 Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Page 2
EXHIBIT --.J3
PAGE~OF ~
3. Deny the comprehensive plan designations for Site Specific Request #5 (Chong Nam Yi).
Enclosed:
Exhibit A - Composite Map and Maps of Each Request
September 25,2001 Staff Report to the LUTC with Exhibits 1-4
Draft Ordinance
ApPROVAL OF COMMIITEE ACTION:
Q7~~--
. fi . ~(/-
~;d'" ~ Eo F,;=
Page 3
EXHØBBT ~
PAGE~OF ~
lIOICOMPPLANlLUTC\IOOIOi Co~,M=o to LUTC ""'09/2612001 1226 PM
/"..--.'
" <5
.~--......,
'.
0
0.5
1.5
2. Miles
~
~
~
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2001
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION CHANGES
Composite Map
Legend: .
¡^\/ City LImits'
':.:: Potential Annexation Area
.. Site Requests
:g,
Q ~
rr ~
~
(
~-t
.:1)
I~
N
Map Prlnted..June 22, 2001
RM1800
uj
w
>
«
I
~
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2001
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION CHANGES
BC
BC
RM1800
Goodwin
Dental Clinic
Site Specific Request #1
(f)
Proposed Designation:
Comprehensive Plan:
comrnllhitýBlIsiness
Zoning: BC
u;
Key:
Steep Slopes
Wetlands
.,,~
"t-, ~
,y ~
G) ":
f1í'
\~ ~
c
~IP
#1
BO,!
Noo.. TI>'O. "'_""d'd .",...U "op,",'~p~..".tlM MI,-
4 "..'¡',olF",.,.'W.,..,.."wm,""""""""'-
'0 0 '0,00 ,<50 200 F..I ^
~.. ~ W
N
Map prlnted..!un. 22, 2001
~~¡
~æ~
RS7.2
proposed Designation:
ÇOl11pr~hensivè Plan.:
Mì.lltifa.íi1Hy
Zoning: RM1800
s 3081H~1
c
S.}12TH ST.
d.,~,......",p,".I~"",""""MO"'r.
:~.r""'"o."""'r"Io'.~oumr.
00 0 ..,100 100 200 FOot ^
~ ~ W
N
City of Federal Way
BCI Comprehensive Plan
2001
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
s.' DESIGNATION CHANGES
uj
g
:r:
0
ü:
ô
«
D-
S.312TH ST.
uj
John Nguyen
Site Specific Request #2
Key:
Steep Slopes
Wetlands
#2
Map P rlnted.Jun. 22. 2001
-c"'1
~ .oJ
;--,
ø -:
fTì
Iw '
C
Ti 'P
--1
Existing Designation:
<King; County)
ComprelÌensi",ePlan:
Oommerical Outsit!e
of ceriter~:"Ur1:ìatr:rfesi dèíi tìàl
(4-12Vhits """
KG Zórring:
1"""""'. .. "f¡J'.tondM""""'.' 'é'ph~., ~p.~~.""" on'y-
ß¡. Cry.'F.d.1JI w.,....... ....,.""'.."'.. ,"""'y.
200 0 200 'iOO. 000 BOO Foot ^
1"10. - 'L4
ßify of Federal Way
Gbrflprehensive Plan
2001
&ITESPECIFIC REQUE&TS
FORC.OMPREHENSIVEPLAN
D'ESIGNATlON CHANGE&
J~rry Jackson
Site Specific Request #3
Key:
IïII Steep Slopes
- Wetlands
~m
G)~
moo
þ1
0
PI
#3
u... -..--..' ....--~ ~_.
~
j
Delenlion
Pond
Se 341 ST S'
Existing Designation:
Comprehensive Plan:
BUsiness Park
Zoning: BP
~lQPo§,ed Designation:
t)omþtenelÌ.sive.Plan:
QommunityBusiness
Zoning: BC
S..344TH $t
u) c;-'
I' BC
I . I
ool"lo.-~ 00 100 ,~ rut !;:,.
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2001
SITESPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
D'ESIGNATIONCHANGES
Chong Nam Vi
Site Specific Request #5
81
Key:
iiI Steep Slopes
III Wetlands
~1
ø:
rr~
IV'
(
I~(
#5
A1'l1- ,
~. , !
-,'* - ~ ,~
-=~r-<." ,
,-,_.þ!r "-
~'==
!"""'L,oo,
(' ,:ï
'C»
_CI Q
!,~
~
'0\
1
~ !
No~' ""...p ""'Iond.d"""",,, ."p'"'I~p~"""'M MI,-
"" C'1ofF.dmIW'y""'no W'ff.myuto".mmy
w.eYGrl18Juser
i World I
H~8dqU8?ters
" "
John Smith
RS9.' Site Specific Request #1
:<
~
~
"'
~~,. ,IJ
~, ", ,-",' "",0, ,",. ,,' ",p, ",' ,- .",' '1,." ,"",'.'
~,,~I
:I:
. ., '-.'" ~
OP-1*
Existing Designation:
ComprehensivE! Plan:
Single Family High Density
Zoning: RS9.6 .
¡"'ò
~+
'0 0 '0 100 100 200 ,... ^
~~- - w
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2001
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION CHANGES
Key:
Steep Slopes
Wetlands
~~
r-.. '7"
~.... "
rn'
I~ 1
(
ï~
rl
#7
u.__u...o.........M""
RS9l6
Proposed Designation:
&â9.61 Comprehensive Plan:
11) Single Family, High Density
Z6r1ing: RS9.6
\jij
Existing.Designation:
Comprehensive-. Plan:
SingleFamily,M~dium Der:tsity
Zoning: RS15.Ö
"
'0 0 '0 100 100 .200 root ^
~~- -- W
City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan
2001
SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION CHANGES
Richard Hanson
Site Specific Request #8
Key:
Steep Slopes
Wetlands." ",
~ ~
GJ ~
'Tí "
~1
c
çr
#8
"'" -..'...." ,.....AA AU'
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
STAFF REPORT
September 25, 2001
2000 Comprehensive Plan Update
Planning Commission Recommendation
Site-Specific Requests #1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8
I.
INTRODUCTION
Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of 1995, and updated the plan in
December of 1998 and September 2000. As part of this present update (the 2001 Amendment
Process), there are eight site-specific requests for amendment to the existing comprehensive plan
designations. This staff report includes six of the eight site-specific requests (#1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8).
Requests #4 and 6 will be presented to the Land Userrransportation Committee at a later date in
order to allow staff to prepare development agreements related to these requests. Locations of all
requests are shown on Exhibit 1, Page 27 of 46 - Composite Map, and the analysis of the six
requests can be found in Exhibit 1, Pages 9-26.
Individual parcel requests for changes to the Comprehensive Plan Map are incorporated into the
comprehensive plan update. If any requests for comprehensive plan amendments were granted,
corresponding zoning changes would be made concurrently. This Update does not include any
proposed changes to the text ofthe Comprehensive Plan. Text changes will be done as part of the
2002 Update, which will be the Five-Year Update. The deadline for submitting requests for the
2002 Comprehensive Plan Update was September 30, 200l.The deadline for King County cities to
complete the Five-Year Update of the Comprehensive Plan is September 2002.
Attached are the following:
1. Exhibit 1- July 8, 2001, Staff Report to Planning Commission.
2. Exhibit 2-July 18,2001, Planning Commission Minutes
3. Exhibit 3 - September 19, 2001, Planning Commission Minutes
4. Exhibit 4 - Comment Letters Received
II. SITE-SPECIFIC REQUESTS
Six of the eight requests are summarized as follows and more fully discussed in Exhibit 1. Please
refer to Exhibit 1, Page 27 of 46 for a Composite Map showing all eight site-specific requests. ' .
Page 1
EYHIBIT C
PAGE-.LOF ~
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST#l- GOODWIN DENTAL CLINIC
File#:
Parcel:
Location:
CPA99-0011
332204-9109
North of 288th Street and east of Pacific Highway (Exhibit 1, Page 28 of
46)
0.48 acres
DMB Consulting Engineers on behalf of the owne.s of the Goodwin
Dental Clinic
Thomas Goodwin & Carl Jacobsen (Goodwin Dental Clinic)
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Multifamily and RM 1800 (one unit per 1,800 square feet) to
Community Business and BC zoning
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request:
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #2 -JOHN NGUYEN
File Number:
Parcel:
Location:
00-104891-00 UP
082104-9138
South of South 308th Street and west of 14th Avenue South (Exhibit 1,
Page 29 of 46)
0.71 acres/31,050 square feet
John Nguyen
Same
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of the
Lake Apartments from Professional Office (PO) to Multifamily and RM
1800 (one unit per 1,800 square feet)
Size:
Applicant:
Owner:
Request:
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request.
Page 2
EXHIBIT C
PAGE~OF -1J-.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #3 - JACKSON ANNEXA nON
File Number:
Parcels:
CPA99-0014
092104-9139; 092104-9316; 092104-9187; 092104-9140; 092104-9206;
0921049028; 092104-9310, 092104-9160 & 092104-9318
North ofSW 320th Street between 1-5 and 32"' Avenue South (Exhibit 1,
Page3010f46)
30.19 acres
Jerry Jackson
Jerry Jackson
Please refer to following table
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Agent:
Owners:
Parcel # Owner Acres
092104-9139 All-American Homes 9.15 acres
092104-9316 All-American Homes 0.36 acres
092104-9187 Lany Weigel 2.09 acres
092104-9140 Donald J. Henderson 2.28 acres
092104-9206 Arthur Henderson 0.34 acres
092104-9028 William Pruett 5.26 acres
092104-9310 Winchester Investment Corporation 4.68 acres
092104-9160 Patty Murphy 1.96 acres
092104-9318 Youngyul Na 4.07 acres
Total 30.19 acres
Request:
Request to change the comprehensive plan from King County
Commercial Outside of Center) and Urban Residential (4-12 dwelling
units per acre) and King County Zoning of Office and R-4 (Residential,
four units per acre) to Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and Zoning of
Office Park (OP)
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request on condition that all restoration work on the site as
approved under King County Sensitive Areas Permit #LOOCGOI8, be
completed, inspected, and approved by King County, prior to City
Council action on the 2001 Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Concur with staff
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #4 -- KITTS CORNER
This request will be presented to the LUTC at a later date in order to allow staff to prepare a
development agreement.
Page 3
EXHIBIT C
PAGE-LOFlJ.-
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #5 - CHONG NAM YI
File Number:
Parcel:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Ageut:
Owuers:
Request:
00-104875-00 UP
202104-9121; 202014-9170; 202104-9171; 202104-9172; 202104-9167;
02104-9168; 202104-9125 & 202104-9169
North of South 344'h Street and west of Pacific Highway South (Exhibit
1, Page 36 of 46)
5.17 acres
Chong Nam Yi
Harry Horan
Please refer to the following table
Parcel # Owner Acres
202104-9121 Chong Nam Yi 1.43
202104-9170 James Mackmer 0.68
202104-9171 Abt Towing 0.34
202104-9172 Abt Towing 0.34
202104-9167 James Mackmer 0.76
202104-9168 Safe-T-Grate Inc. 0.38
202104-9125 Richard L. Degrout 0.38
202104-9169 H.L. Frease 0.86
Total 5.17
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Business Park (BP) to Community Business (Be)
Staff
Recommendation: Do not approve the request
Planning Commissiou
Recommendation: Concur with staff
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #6 - CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER
This request will be presented to the LUTC at a later date in order to allow staff to gather
additional information.
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #7 - JOHN SMITH
File Number:
Parcel:
Location:
Size:
Applicant:
Agent:
Owner:
Request:
00-104441-00 UP
726120-0060
East of33,d Place South in East Campus (Exhibit 1, Page 40 of 46)
3.1 acres
John Smith
Harry Horan
Rachel Smith
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Single Family High Density Residential and RS 9.6 to Office Park (OP)
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request.
Page 4
EXHIBIT _C
Pi "'r .A¡F'I~
f-" I..;j C. ~ '-' - . ~
SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #8 - RiCHARD HANSON
File Nnmber:
Parcel:
Location:
00-104224-00 UP
302104-9033
South of proposed Silverwood Subdivision, west of 9th Avenue SW
(Exhibit 1, Page 44 of 46)
15.46 acres
Richard Hanson
De-En Lang, Subdivision Management
Richard Hanson
Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from
Single Family Medium Density ResidentiallRS 15.0 to Single Family
High Density ResidentiallRS 9.6
Size:
Applicant:
Agent:
Owner:
Reqnest:
Staff
Recommendation: Approve the request
Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve the request.
III. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Article IX, "Process VI Review," any amendments to
the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map, or zoning text must be approved by
the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission.
IV. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on July 18,2001, and September 19, 2001.
Please refer to Exhibits 2 and 3 for minutes. After conclusion of the public hearings, the Planning
Commission by a majority vote of the entire membership, recommended that the City Council take
the following action:
I)
Approve the requested comprehensive plan designations for Site Specific Requests #1
(Goodwin), #2 (John Nguyen), #7 (John Smith), and #8 (Hanson).
2)
Approve the requested comprehensive plan designation for Site Specific Request #3 (Jackson)
on condition that all restoration work on the site as approved under King County Sensitive
Areas Permit #LOOCGO 18, be completed, inspected, and approved by King County prior to
City Council action on the 2001 Comprehensive Plan amendments.
3)
Deny the comprehensive plan designations for the Site Specific Request #5 (Chong Nam Vi).
Page 5
EXHJ ß ~T__c.'
PAGE~OF -1.Iø-.
v.
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
July 4,2001
Threshold Determination issued pursuant to the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA)
July 18,2001
Planning Commission Public Hearing
August 15,2001
Continuation of Planning Commission Public Hearing (there was no
quorum)
September 19,2001
Public Hearing Continued - The Planning Commission made a motion
to forward their recommendations to the Land Useffransportation
Committee
October 1,2001
Land Useffransportation Committee Meeting
VI. DECISIONAL CRITERIA
1.
FWCC Section 22-529. Factors to Be Considered in a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The city may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed
amendment to the comprehensive plan:
(1) The effect upon the physical environment.
The proposed comprehensive plan amendments are non-project actions and in themselves
will not affect the physical environment. If approved, they will result in changes to the
comprehensive plan map and zoning map. An evaluation of potential impacts to the
environment as a result of the non-project action was conducted and a threshold
determination (Determination of Non significance [DNS]), pursuant to the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) was issued on July 4, 2001.
No development is proposed in conjunction with this non-project action. If the requests
for changes to comprehensive plan designations and zoning are approved, and permits for
development are submitted, the individual projects will be subject to environmental
review as required by the SEPA Rules, and will be evaluated in accordance with all plans,
policies, rules, and regulations adopted as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority
under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. In addition, when future
projects are submitted, any erosion-related impacts created during clearing and
construction activities will be mitigated in compliance with the King County Surface
Water Manual (KCSWM), which the city has adopted. This requires that any erosion-
related impacts created during clearing and construction activities be addressed according
to a city approved grading and erosion control plan, which is a standard part of
engineering review and approval.
Page 6
EXH;B~T C
PAGE-'-OF --
If future development is proposed in the vicinity of any streams, lakes or wetlands,
compliance with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIV, "Environmentally Sensitive Areas,"
will be required, and such compliance will result in mitigation of any potential adverse
impacts. Of the requests being addressed in this staff report, Requests #3, 5, 7, and 8 for
comprehensive plan changes have on-site wetlands.
(2)
The effect on open space, streams, and lakes.
The proposed amendments are non-project in nature. Site-Specific Requests #1 and 2 are
for developed sites with nonconfonning uSeS. The requests are intended to make the
existing uSeS confonn to their zoning. Site Specific Request #5 is comprised of eight
different parcels under five different owners. The majority of the parcels are already
developed with light industrial uSeS. There are two abandoned houses on Site #7.
Requests #3,5,7, and 8 all have on-site wetlands and there is an on-site stream on Site
#5. Except for Requests #5 and 7, the sites are presently undeveloped. An evaluation of
potential impacts to the environment as a result of changes in the comprehensive plan
designation and zoning of the site-specific requests was conducted and a threshold
detennination (DNS), pursuant to SEPA, was issued on July 4,2001. If future
development is proposed in the vicinity of any streams, lakes or wetlands, compliance
with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIV, "Environmentally Sensitive Areas" will be required
and such compliance will result in mitigation of any potential adverse impacts.
(3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding
neighborhoods.
The proposed map changes will not impact adjacent land uses and surrounding
neighborhoods. Two of the site-specific requests (# I and 2), if approved, will not result
in any change in land USe since the sites are already developed with a dental office and
apartments respectively. Site # 3 presently has four single-family houses and a triplex on
the site. It is assumed that if a comprehensive plan designation of Office Park is granted,
the entire site may redevelop with office USeS. If this occurs, the uSeS on this site should
be compatible with uSeS to the south and southeast, which are zoned for office uSe. There
are some existing large lot single-family development to the north and northeast.
Compliance with City code, including Design Guidelines should promote compatibility
between office uses and residential uSeS.
(4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools.
This is a non-project action, which does not include actual development applications. If
the site-specific requests are granted, specific impacts associated with development will
be evaluated at the time that a development permit is applied for, and any potential
adverse impacts will be mitigated at that time.
(5)
The benefit to the neighborhood, city, and region.
This staff report covers six of the eight site-specific requests being considered as part of
this annual update. Two of the site-specific requests (Requests #1 and 2) are already
Page 7
EXH~B~T c.. L
PAGE-LOF 11=
developed with a dental clinic and apartments respectively. Granting the requested
comprehensive plan designations will result in these uses becoming legally conforming
and will allow continued use of a viable business in the case of Request #1 and
continuation of uSeS that are compatible with neighboring uSeS in the caSe of Request #2.
¡fRequest #3 is granted an Office Park designation upon annexation, this will be
beneficial to the neighborhood, city, and region by providing continuation of office uSeS
in an area that has demand for such uSe. If and when the site is developed as office, the
city has adequate regulations in place to promote compatibility of office uses with
neighboring residential uses.
Changing the designation of Request #5 from Business Park to Community Business
would not be a benefit to the neighborhood or city, as it would result in existing industrial
type uSeS becoming nonconforming. Request #7 is located in East Campus, an area that is
undergoing rapid office development. In addition, based on its location, it is not desirable
for residential development. If Request #8 was granted, a RS 9.6 zoning (Single Family,
one unit per 9,600 square feet), and a cluster subdivision concept was utilized, this would
result in development that was compatible with development both to the north
(Silverwood, a 50-lot single-family residential plat) and larger lot single-family
residential development to the south.
(6) Tlte quantity and location of land plannedfor tlte proposed land use type and density
and tlte demand for suclt land.
This update does not represent a substantial departure in land uSe within the existing city
boundary. Sites # I and 2 are already developed and the requests for changes in
designation would make the uSeS conforming to the zone. The proposed designation for
Site #3, which is presently within the city's Potential Annexation Area, is Office Park.
The July 2000 Market Study projected a need for additional office space in the 2000 to
2020 period. Site #5 is mostly developed with industrial type uses. The proposed
designation for Site #7 is Office Park, which is consistent with the adjacent uSeS. Site #8
is located to the south of a Silverwood, a 50-lot preliminary plat. Although uses to the
south and east are large lot single-family development, the proposed designation would be
consistent with the designation to the north, and if the site were developed using cluster
subdivision provisions, the sizes of the lots adjacent to the RS 15.0 zone would be
compatible with the adjacent zoning.
(7)
Tlte current and projected population density in tlte area.
As of April I, 2001, the official city population from the Washington State of Office of
Financial Management was 83,890. The present density is six people per acre, or 3,902
people per square mile. No new population projects were done as part of the
comprehensive plan update. Please also refer to response under (6), above.
(8)
Tlte effect upon otlter aspects of tlte compreltensive plan.
There should not be any adverse impacts on the comprehensive plan as a result of the
proposed changes.
Page 8
EXH;B~T G
PAGE-'-.OF ~
2.
Section 22-530. Criteria For Amending The Comprehensive Plan
The city may amend the comprehensive plan only if it finds that:
(1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or
welfare; and
Site-Specific Requests #1, 2, 3, 7, and 8, if approved, should not adversely affect public
health, safety, or welfare. Approval of Requests # 1 and 2 would result in long-standing
uses attaining a conforming status, while not affecting their surroundings, Requests #3
and 7 would provide office space in an area that is experiencing a demand for office
development, and approval of Request #8 would result in provision of additional
residential uses. On the other hand, approval of Request #5 would result in existing
conforming uses becoming nonconforming.
(2) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city.
Please see response under (I), above.
(3) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36. 70A and with
the portion of the city's adopted plan not affected by the amendment.
RCW Chapter 36.70A, the Growth Management Act (GMA), requires the City of Federal
Way to adopt and implement a comprehensive plan and to amend it in a timely manner,
but no more than once a year, except under certain circumstances. The city is responding
to this mandate by updating the comprehensive plan.
3.
Compliance With FWCC Section 22-488(C)
(1) The city may approve the application only if it finds that:
a.
The proposed request is in the best interests of the residents of the city;
Site Specific Requests #1 and #2 - Changing the designation of these sites from
Multiple Family and Professional Office to Community Business and Multiple
Family will not directly benefit the residents of the city; however, the changes will
result in an existing viable uses becoming conforming to the zone. In addition, the
changes in comprehensive plan and zoning will not adversely affect adjacent uses.
Site Specific Request #3 - This request is for a comprehensive plan designation of
Office Park upon annexation to the city. Annexation of the property to the city is in
the best interests of city residents because this property is located in the city's
Potential Annexation Area (PAA) and abuts city limits on the east, west, and south.
It is the intent ofthe GMA that all property within a city's PAA be eventually
annexed to the city. City code requires annexed property to be given an appropriate
comprehensive plan designation and zoning upon annexation. Given the character of
this area, Office Park appears to be the most appropriate designation.
Page 9
r"~~~~~T ,
f; ¡.\ G E..!... 0 F..L.L..
And
Site Specific Request #5 - Changing the designation of these sites from Business
Park to Community Business will not benefit the residents ofthe city because there
is presently no need for additional commercially zoned land.
Site Specific Request #7 - A change from Single-Family Residential to Office Park
for this site is appropriate for this area due to the existing office character of adjacent
property.
Site Specific Request #8 - When the comprehensive plan was first adopted, this area
was granted RS 15.0 zoning due to the presence of environmentally sensitive areas
and the lack of sewer. In recent years, sewer has been extended southwards as
development has occurred to the areas north of the site. Changing the comprehensive
plan designation and zoning from Single-Family Medium Density Residential and
RS 15.0 to Single-Family High Density Residential and RS 9.6 will be in the best
interests of the residents of the city by providing for housing in urbanized areas.
b.
The proposed request is appropriate because either:
i.
Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so
significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and
that, under those changed conditions, a change in designation is within the
public interest;
Site Specific Request #3 - This property is presently located outside of the city
within unincorporated King County. This site has an existing comprehensive
plan designation of King County Commercial Outside of Center and Urban
Residential (4-12 dwelling units per acre) and King County Zoning of Office
and R-4 (Residential, four units per acre). In recent years, the area within the
city limits, south of South 320" and east of 1-5, has experienced significant
office development. In addition, the area to the east of this site is already zoned
Office Park. As a result of these changes, a change in designation upon
annexation of this property from the existing King County zoning to Federal
Way Office Park would provide consistency within this area.
Site Specific Request #5 - This request for a change in comprehensive plan
designation and zoning from Business Park to Community Business does not
meet either part of these criteria.
Site Specific Request #7 - This site is located within the East Campus area,
which was annexed in 1994. Since that time, with the exceptions of pre-existing
residential areas along North Lake, this area has experienced significant office
development. A change from Single-Family Residential to Office Park for this
site is appropriate for this area due to the existing office character of adjacent
property.
Site Specific Request #8 - When the comprehensive plan was first adopted, this
area was granted RS 15.0 zoning. At that time, this area was characterized by
Page to
F~'~~R"T C
PAGE 10 OF 1L-
large lot rural development. In recent years, sewer has been extended
southwards and development has occurred to the areas north of the site. The
character of the area is changing due to the construction of single-family
residential dwellings on smaller lots.
or
ii.
The change in designation will correct a designation that was inappropriate
when established.
Site Specific Request #1 - At the time that the city incorporated, this site had
split zoning under King County. The western half was designated BC
(Community Business) and the eastern half was designated RM 900 (Multiple
Dwelling). A medical/dental clinic was an authorized use in either zone and the
clinic was constructed in 1980. Upon incorporation, the site was zoned RM
1800 (Multifamily - one unit per 1800 square feet) by Federal Way. A medical!
dental clinic is a nonconfonning use in the RM 1800 zone. Changing the
designation from Multiple Family to Community Business will change the use
from a legally nonconfonning use to a use that is allowed within the zoning
district.
Site Specific Request #2 - The Lake Apartments, a IS-unit complex, was
constructed in 1958. At the time of city incorporation in 1990, it was zoned RM
900 (Multiple Dwelling) by King County. Federal Way adopted a zoning of
Professional Office for this apartment complex and the two parcels to the north.
Changing the designation from Professional Office to Multiple Family will
result in this site becoming confonning to the zone. The Lake Easter Estates
Condominiums to the west and the Liberty Lake Condominiums to the south
already have multi-family zoning.
c.
It is consistent with the comprehensive plan;
This criterion is not applicable since the requests are for changes in comprehensive
plan designations.
d.
It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those
adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan;
Site Specific Requests #1 and #2 - If approved, the requests would not result in any
changes to the physical layout of the sites, and therefore, would not affect any
provisions of this chapter (zoning code). In addition Request #1 would be consistent
with language on page II-16 of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, which states
that, "The Community Business Designation runs along both sides ofSR-99 from
South 272"' to South 348"'." This site falls within that area.
Request #2 would be consistent with Policy LUP23 ofthe Comprehensive Plan,
which reads, "Support multiple family development with transportation and capital
facilities improvements." The Lakes Apartments are located one block to the west of
Pacific Highway and approximately half a block north of South 312"' Street.
Page 11
EYHJB~T C
PAGE-LLOF Ii
Transportation is readily accessible as both Pacific Highway and South 312"' Street
are bus routes.
Site Specific Requests #3 - The overall vision ofthe comprehensive plan is to
provide an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. A Market
Study prepared for the City in 2000 identifies that the finance, insurance, real estate,
and services (FIRES) sector has the greatest demand for future built space.
Designating this property as Office Park upon annexation would provide additional
office space in an area presently experiencing demand for office space.
Site Specific Requests #5 - Changing the designation ofthese parcels from Business
Park to Community Business would result in existing uses that are penn is sible under
Business Park zoning becoming legal nonconfonning uses This is not the intent of
the zoning code and the comprehensive plan. In addition, the overall vision ofthe
Comprehensive Plan is to restrict commercial development to the downtown (City
Center Core and Frame), to Pacific Highway South, generally between South 272"'
Street and South 348"' Street, and to the areas found around South 348"' Street,
approximately between SR-99 and 1-5.
Site Specific Requests #7 - The overall vision of the comprehensive plan is to
provide an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. A Market
Study prepared for the City in 2000 identifies that the finance, insurance, real estate,
and services (FIRES) sector has the greatest demand for future built space. Changing
the designation from Residential to Office Park would provide additional office
space in an area presently experiencing demand for office space.
Site Specific Requests #8 - The Comprehensive Plan (page 11-13) states that the
Single-Family Medium Density designation creates urban lots with a density range
of one to three dwelling units per acre to avoid developing on or near
environmentally sensitive areas. However, Federal Way Policy LUP9 states,
"Designate and zone land for Federal Way's share of regionally-adopted demand
forecasts for residential, commercial and industrial uses for the next 20 years." RS
9.6 zoning would allow for 4.5 units per acre, as opposed to the presently allowable
density of 2.9 units per acre. The Market Study prepared for the City in 2000
identifies a shortage ofland zoned outright for residential development in tenus of
meeting regional forecasts, based on historical development.
And
e.
It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
As discussed above, granting the Requests #1, 2, 3,7, and 8 are consistent with the
policies in the comprehensive plan; therefore, they is also consistent with the public
health, safety, and welfare. Granting Request #5 would result in exiting legal uses
attaining a nonconfonning legal status.
Page 12
E'fHðßnT C
PAGE~OF~
(2)
The City may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if
itflnds that:
a. The criteria in subsection (1) above are met; and
b. The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and
c. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts
on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; and
d. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and
utilities.
The requests under consideration are for changes in the comprehensive plan designation
and zoning. They are not project-related rezones, and therefore, the criteria under this
section do not apply.
VII. COUNCIL ACTION
Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report, and at
its discretion holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total
membership choose one of the following options:
1.
Approve the proposal by ordinance;
2.
ModifY and approve the proposal by ordinance;
3.
Disapprove the proposal by resolution; or
4.
Refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this occurs, the
City Council shall specifY the time within which the Planning Commission shall report to the
City Council on the proposal.
1:\OICOMPPLANlLUTC\IOOIOI Staff Report to the LUTCdoc/O9/26/2001 12:21 PM
Page 13
f'V~,~~rr C
PJ-\~E~OF -1I-
, . .