The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 09-05-2000 Special/Regular City of Federal Way City Council Meeting AGENDA COUNCILMEMBERS Mike Park, Mayor Jeanne Burbidge Linda Kochmar Michael Hellickson Dean McColgan Mary Gates Phil Watkins CITY MANAGER David H. Moseley Office of the City Clerk September 5, 2000 ~! . I. TI. ill. 1. ll. ill. a. b. c. IV. " . . . ". :.," ~ . '... AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall September 5, 2000 (www.cìfederal-way.wa.us) ***** SPECIAL MEETING - 4:30 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER YOUTH COMMISSION & LODGING TAX ADVISORY.-=- COMMITTEE INTERVIEWS ADJOURNMENT ***** REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATIONS Public Safety Partnership Recognition A ward City Manager/Introduction of New City Employees City Manager/Emerging Issues CITIZEN COMMENT .PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address City Council at lhis time. When recognized by lhe Mayor, please come forward to the podium, adjust the microphone to proper height, and slate your name and address for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE ß) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that contintll' too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. over please. . . ,J ~ , . V. CONSENT AGENDA (Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval; all items will be enacted by one motion,' individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion.) a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 1. J. k. 1. m. n. o. p. VI. VII. a. b. c. VIII. Minutes/ August 1. 2000 Regular Meeting & August 14. 2000 Special Meeting Vouchers/September 5. 2000 Monthly Financial Report/Month of July Council Bill #251/ 1999 Comprehensive Plan Update/Enactment Ordinance Council Bill #252/Traffic Safety School! Enactment Ordinance 2001 CDBG Use of Funds School Impact Fee/Facilities Plan EMS/Patient Transport Fees Chelan County Regional Jail Interlocal Agreement Okanogan County Jail Interlocal Agreement SCA Special Assessment for 2000 for ESA Support Department of Licensing Interagency Agreement Traffic Unit Radar Reimbursements 11 th PI So Drainage Improvements Proiect! Authorization to Award Bid A ward & Purchase/Document Management Systems Software Purchase of Interactive Voice Response (IVR) System PUBLIC HEARING Moratorium on Cluster Subdivisions Staff Report Citizen Comment City Council Deliberation Resolution CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Youth Commission Appointments Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointment Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE Council Bill #253/Criminal Code Amendment AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER SIX, CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 91-89,91-106, 94-208, AND 97-299). , IX. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS X. CITY MANAGER REPORT XI. EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.llO(l)(j) XII. ADJOURNMENT .... THE COUNCIL MA Y ADD AND TAKE ACTiON ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LlSTlW ON T[[E AGENDA .... THERE ARE 2 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETS A V AILABLE FOR CITIZEN REVIEW OF DETAILED ITEMS ON THE CONFERENCE TABLE AT THE BACK OF COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEETING DATE: September 5,2000 . ITEM# ::-y (a.) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMA TION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ATTACHMENTS: Minutes for August 1, 2000 regular meeting and August 14,2000 special meeting. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirement. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nla CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Move approval of the official minutes. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COU~ PACKET: . (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers - City Hall August 1, 2000 - 7:00 p.m. MINUTES OR~f1 I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Park called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of 7:03 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Mike Park, Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar, Council members Jeanne Burbidge, Mary Gates, Dean McColgan, and Phil Watkins. Council member Michael Hellickson was excused. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, Interim City Attorney Bob Sterbank, and City Clerk Chris Green. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council member Gates led the flag salute. III. PRESENT A TIONS a. City Manager/Introduction of New City Employees City Manager David Moseley introduced Gurjit Pander as the new City Prosecutor; Veronica Alicea-Galvin as the new Assistant Prosecutor; Shon Lunt and Devon Gabreluk as new Public Safety Officers; and Tom Wessell as the construction inspector for the Public Works Department. b. City Manager/Emerging Issues City Manager David Moseley asked Municipal Court Judge David Tracy to update Council on the progress of the Municipal Court in the first six months of operation. Judge David Tracy distributed a packet of information to each Council member to review, which detailed the break down of total infractions and criminal cases. He explained and discussed the caseloads and procedures the court follows for each hearing, and noted the court is going the extra Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes August 1, 2000 - Page 2 mile to ensure efficient and cost effective service to the citizens. Councilmembers thanked Judge Tracy for the update, and noted the court is doing a wonderful job in serving the citizens of Federal Way. IV. CITIZEN COMMENT Stephen Percival - reminded everyone of Federal Way's upcoming Family Fest celebration at Steel Lake Park August 25th - 27th. Susie Horan - in favor of arts programs in the community, including the FUSION event being held at Dumas Bay Centre, Wednesday, August 2nd. Cindy Mazzeo - in favor of arts programs in the community, and asked Council to consider these worthwhile programs at budget time. Roger Woodward. Donna Fraiser. and Marvin Miller - addressed concerns about a home occupation located in their neighborhood that is negatively affecting their properties. Pamela Somerville - addressed concerns regarding a deadend street in her neighborhood that leads to private beach access, which has been a magnet for criminal activities. She asked Council to consider closing or limiting access to the road. v. CONSENT AGENDA a. b. c. d. Minutes/July 18. 2000 Regular Meeting -APPROVED Vouchers/August 1. 2000 --APPROVED Monthly Financial Report/Month of June -APPROVED Council Bill #250/Williams Communication Fiber Optic Franchise Enactment Ordinance -APPROVED ORDINANCE #00-371 Family Fest Memorandum of Understanding -APPROVED International District Artwork -APPROVED City Center Entry Signs -APPROVED Surplus of Steel Lake Maintenance Facility Office Trailer/Bid Results -APPROVED e. f. a. b. DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Kochmar McColgan Park Watkins yes yes yes yes yes excused yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes August 1, 2000 - Page 3 VI. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Cancellation of August 15. 2000 Regular Meeting DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED TO SUSPEND THE CITY COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE AND CANCEL THE AUGUST 15, 2000 REGULAR MEETING; COUNCILMEMBER McCOLGAN SECOND. The motion passes as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Kochmar yes yes excused yes McColgan Park Watkins yes yes yes b. Letter to Sound Transit COUNCILMEMBER WATKINS MOVED TO SEND THE LETTER AS PRESENTED TO SOUND TRANSIT; DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Kochmar yes yes excused yes McColgan Park Watkins yes yes yes VII. INTRODUCTION ORDINANCES a. Council Bill #251/Comprehensive Plan Amendments AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S ZONING MAP. COUNCILMEMBER WATKINS MOVED COUNCIL BILL #251/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS TO SECOND READING/ENACTMENT AT THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 5, 2000; COUNCILMEMBER MCCOLGAN SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE MOVED TO AMEND SECTIONS 2 AND 3 OF COUNCIL BILL #251, TO ADOPT THE STAFF'S RECOl\1MENDA TION ON SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST NO.3 (VELASCO), TO CHANGE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING FROM SINGE FAMILY HIGH DENSITY AND RS 9.6, TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION OF OFFICE PARK AND A ZONING Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes August 1, 2000 - Page 4 DESIGNA TION OF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE. This motion is contingent upon three conditions: CONDITION NO.1: That the property owner design and construct his development proposal in the fonn and under the conditions set forth in the staff recommendation that accompanied the Request before the Planning Commission. CONDITION NO.2: That within 6 months of the adoption of the comprehensive plan and zoning changes, or such other time period as provided by the City Council, the property owner's agreement to design and construct be set forth in a development agreement acceptable in fonn and substance to the City Attorney and the City Council, and be executed by the developer and the City Manager; and CONDITION NO.3: If a development agreement is not approved within 6 months of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes, or within such other period provided by the City Council, the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation changes are automatically rescinded without the need for further action by the City Council. ADDITIONALLY MOVED TO DIRECT THE INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE APPROPRIATE MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE CONTAINED IN COUNCIL BILL #251 FOR THE COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION AT SECOND READING; DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR SECOND. Council members Watkins and McColgan expressed concern with the proposed amendment, and stated they would not be supportive. Mayor Park, Deputy Mayor Kochmar, and Councilmembers Gates and Burbidge voiced their support of the amendment. The amendment passed 4-2 as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Kochmar yes yes excused yes McColgan Park Watkins no yes no The main motion as amended, passed 6-0 as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Koch mar yes yes excused yes McColgan Park Watkins yes yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes August 1, 2000 - Page 5 b. Council Bill #252/Traffic Safety School AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING A TRAFFIC SAFETY SCHOOL TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE MOVED COUNCIL BILL #252 TO SECOND READING/ ENACTMENT AT THE NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 5, 2000; COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passes as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Kochmar yes yes excused yes McColgan Park Watkins yes yes yes VITI. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Gates announced the next meeting of the Finance/Economic Development/ Regional Affairs Committee will be August 22nd, at 2: 00 p. m., and updated Council on regional Issues. Councilmember Burbidge reported the next meeting of the Parks/Recreation/Human Services/ Public Safety Committee will be August 7th, at 12:00 noon, and updated Council on regional issues. She noted Dumas Bay Centre will be hosting FUSION, which supports transitional housing for women and children on Wednesday, August 2nd, and the Centerstage presentation of "Crimes of the Heart" continues at Knutzen Family Theatre through August 5th. Councilmember Watkins stated the next meeting of the Land Use/Transportation Committee will be August 7th, at 5:30 p.m. Councilmember McColgan noted his attendance at the various youth tournaments held at Celebration Park over the weekend and extended "kudos" to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department for an outstanding job of upkeep and maintenance of the park. Deputy Mayor Kochmar updated Council on the recent activities of the Regional Policy Committee, and noted she would be attending FUSION held at Dumas Bay Centre on Wednesday, August 2nd. She extended best wishes to Chamber President Alison Corrigan who will be relocating to Portland Oregon; and also reminded citizens of the upcoming Family Fest at Steel Lake Park on August 25th -27th. Mayor Park reported on his attendance at the Lakehaven/City liaison meeting and the School District! City liaison meeting; he noted, seven Jr. High School students, a teacher and principal recently visited City Hall from Hachinohe, Japan. He announced the anticipated visit from Miki Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes August 1, 2000 - Page 6 Ogoma, representing APLNET Secretariat with Gifu International Center on August 3rd at II :00 a.m. IX. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley reported the two major Public Works projects are underway in downtown Federal Way, the first being street improvements on So. 320th Street and Hwy 99 are in the initial stages of clearing vegetation and setting barriers... he asked for everyone to have patience and to avoid the area if at all possible. The second downtown project is the SeaTac Mall storm drainage, which will improve drainage in the downtown area. Mr. Moseley requested an executive session of approximately 45-minutes in length to discuss collective bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(a), and potential litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30. 110(1)(i). X. EXECUTIVE SESSION d. Collective Bargaining/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.140 (4)(a) Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30. 11O(I)(i) e. Mayor Park announced an approximate 45-minute executive session; no action anticipated. Council returned to chambers at 9:20 p.m. XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Park adjourned the regular meeting at the hour of 9:20 p.m. N. Christine Green, CMC City Clerk FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING Council Chambers - City Hall August 14, 2000 - 5:30 p.m. MINUTES O~~f1 I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Park called the special meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of 5:38 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Mike Park, Deputy Mayor Linda Kochmar, Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Dean McColgan, and Michael Hellickson. Councilmembers Mary Gates and Phil Watkins were excused. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, Interim City Attorney Bob Sterbank, and Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney. II. KING COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR MOVED TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO SEND THE PROPOSED LETTER AS PRESENTED TO THE KING COUNTY OFFICE OF REGIONAL POLICY AND PLANNING, PER THE LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION; COUNCILMEMBER MCCOLGAN SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE MOVED TO AMEND THE PROPOSED LETTER FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES, TO ADD THE WORD "REGARDING" AS REFLECTED IN "EXHffiIT A" ATTACHED HERETO; DEPUTY MAYOR KOCHMAR SECOND. The motion to approve the amendment passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Kochmar Yes Excused Yes Yes McColgan Park Watkins Yes Yes Excused "- The motion to approve the main motion, as amended, passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Hellickson Kachmar Yes Excused Yes Yes McColgan Park Watkins Yes Yes Excused III. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Park adjourned the regular meeting at the hour of 5:42 p.m. Stephanie D. Courtney Deputy City Clerk /"" It:XHIKlT * ( E.D~ (253) 661-4000 FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003-6210 August 14, 2000 DRAFr Ms. Carol Chan, Policy Analyst King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning 516 3rd Avenue, Room 402 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Amendment to the King County Countywide Planning Policies Dear Ms. Chan: The Federal Way City Council at its August 14,2000, meeting reviewed the following p"roposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs): ( l. Motion 99-1 - An amendment to the CPPs to adjust targets for new housing units to reflect annexations and incorporations from April 1994 through January 1998. 2. Substitute Motion 99-2 - An amendment to the CPPs to reassign new housing targets for Potential Annexation Areas (P AAs) and adoption of an armexation area map, along with provisions requiring it to remain interim until all unincorporated urban areas are included in city P AAs without gaps or overlaps regardless of whether cities have entered into interlocal agreements to set annexation area boundaries. 3. Motion 99-4 - Replacement of the six-year development capacity work item with the review and evaluation ("Buildable Lands") program that creates a role for the County in addressing cities' growth targets. The Council made the following motions: 2. Do not accept Motion 99-1. The City Council has detennined that the housing targets assigned to the City of Federal Way are too high, and therefore acceptance of additional targets at this time is not acceptable. In addition, for the most part the areas recently annexed by Federal Way are not residential and therefor~ the transfer of additio~ housing targets along with these annexation areas is not appropriate. lOv~~():,~~ Do not accept that portion of Substitute Motion 99-Z, which proposes to reassign new housing targets for P AAs, based on the same reasoning asM¿tion 99-1. In addition, the Council determined that it cannöt accept Substitute Motion 99-2 unless language relating to Potential Annexation Area boundaries is amended as follows: l. Ms. Carol Chan Page 2 August 14,2000 ".... The Interim P AA Map describes the areas receivirig target allocations in Table CPP Appendix 2B. This map is considered to be interim until.all unincorporated urban areas are included in City P AAs without gaps or overlaps~ except for those jurisdictions, which have entered into P AA Interlocal-A.greements with all surrounding jurisdictions, in which case, the PAA boundaries shall be considered final. Other than final P AA boundaries, this map may also be amended to reflect other CPP policy direction." 3. Do not accept Motion 99-4, an amendment to the CPPs to replace the six-year development capacity work item with the review and evaluation ("Buildable Lands") program, unless the following proposed amendment is incorporated into the motion: Under Step 5b, "...Ifthe results of this program are inconsistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA), King County and its cítíes each jurisdiction not achieving urban densities as demonstrated by the review and evaluation program shall identify reasonable measures in accordance with.the GMA, other than adjusting the Urban Growth areas, that are reasonably likely to increase consistency that will be taken to comply with those requirements." If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Bob Sterbank, Interim City Attorney, at 253-661-4572.. Sincerely, Mike Park, Mayor City of Federal Way c: Stephen Clifton, AICP, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner I:\KCWPI'S'.O80800 Lc«or 10 King County.cIocNlllOO 1:21 AM " ( ( ....~~:!'.~Q..P.~~;...~~P.~~~~~~..~L~.~.........................................!~~~ .=JL ~) .................................. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: VOUCHER ....o.................................................................................................."""...............o.'o."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'".................................. .................. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ 2,253,940.49 Expenditure Amt: $ 2,253,940.49 Contingency Reqd: """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST .............................................................".......................................""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'".............................................. ........ SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certüy under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City ---f Federal Way, Washington, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certüy to said claims. ~~~.~~....:~.!t.. ..~::._~~..~d.._.........._............................."""""'--"-""'-""""'-...-......-......... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: ... ~ P. P.:':.~!~.. ~~~~.~~.! ~ ~~~ ~~ ..P.~~~!.~ ~.!! ç~.. ~~.~ ~~.............. ....... ............... """""" ............................................. ..o.................................... .,.. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve vouchers. """""""""'...............................................................o...............o.......................................................................~.... ..... . """"""~~"::Ø~"~""'" APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL P ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) . COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # ORDINANCE # FIRST READING ENACTMENT READ RESOLUTION # G- - \ 0 chklst 01/31/2000 07:28:37 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154634 07/17/00 000954 DNB MAILING SERVICES 3053-POSTA 07/13/00 SWR-POSTAGE:RECYCLE FL 251.49 251. 49 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154635 07/17/00 005253 BANKCARD CENTER LAW-SEMINA 06/16/00 LAW-FRED PRYOR SEMINAR 125.00 125.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154636 07/20/00 701347 DCG II, LLC 2423200050 07/19/00 PW-PROPERTY ACQUISITIO 211,200.00 211,200.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154637 07/27/00 000092 KING COUNTY-METROPOLITAN SV PWT-VOUCHE 07/25/00 PWT-COMMUTER BONUS VOU 350.00 350.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154638 07/31/00 000007 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 154639 07/31/00 000007 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 154640 07/31/00 000007 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 154641 07/31/00 000007 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 154642 07/31/00 000007 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC 156638 06/30/00 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 116.65 Voucher: Bank Code: key 230610 06/30/00 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 88.10 285762 06/30/00 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 105.56 944058 06/30/00 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 75.02 040603 06/30/00 MSDP-OFFICE SUPPLIES 14 .19 143671 06/30/00 MSDP-OFFICE SUPPLIES 415.94 198732 06/30/00 MSDP-CREDIT:INV 143671 -393.82 234529 06/30/00 MSDP-lMAGE TONER 181.38 955269 06/30/00 MSDP-OFFICE SUPPLIES 641.63 298056 06/30/00 MSF-OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.58 315015 06/30/00 CDHS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 102.61 215008 06/30/00 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.38 243000 06/30/00 LAW-CREDIT:INV 215008 -19.54 049207 06/30/00 CM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 13 9.03 283031 06/30/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES 62.71 086659 06/30/00 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 121.67 112211 06/30/00 MSC-OFF~CE SUPPLIES 122.72 091098 06/30/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.27 112284 06/30/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.77 188119 06/30/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES. 44.73 319402 06/30/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.69 973155 06/30/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.59 040864 06/30/00 MSHR-OFFICE SUPPLIES 13.75 121301 06/30/00 MSF-OFFICE SUPPLIES 83.31 ----------------------_..------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 1 c;.-;;¿ 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:37 Check .uist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description 154642 07/31/00 000007 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ (continued) 244597 961304 155656 319658 319691 319721 319745 934904 078543 084155 150344 226905 310110 103470 157071 157081 178354 320447 935058 935121 050668 935179 044079 071930 120049 144624 146091 168277 268792 928585 974531 034681 051657 059941 060004 167054 257619 155732 320486 934974 030456 034330 042517 056920 060307 068222 081892 153725 06/30/00 MSF-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 MSF-PAYROLL WINDOW ENV 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PKA-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PKM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PKM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PKM-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 PKDBC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-CREDIT:INV 505273 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/0Q PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 06/30/00 PS-OFFI~E SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-CREDIT:INV 042517 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PS-CREDIT:INV 951641 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 60.82 122.76 409.56 94.52 63.01 126.01 63.01 283.54 301.66 13 9.52 64.45 59.42 53.31 55.17 129.92 55.04 90.01 63.01 94.52 94.52 38.55 63.01 49.14 104.12 104.06 -21. 44 227.01 33.69 61.67 50.89 34.02 381.29 3.90 -155.94 158.45 9.98 15.97 378.06 220.53 220.53 55.22 23.34 72.77 -38.02 -2.45 29.94 -6.96 25.76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (' - Î \7-:J Page: 2 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:38 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154642 07/31/00 000007 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC (continued) 162957 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 93.92 218825 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.94 237387 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.58 237827 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.84 260627 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 130.93 321425 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.16 321712 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.71 885908 06/30/00 PS-CREDIT:INV 861866 -22.85 908809 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.67 279129 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 13.00 284210 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 102.22 951641 06/30/00 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 120.06 960636 06/30/00 PS-CREDIT:INV 951641 - 62.71 993442 06/30/00 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.36 320242 06/30/00 MSM&D-COPIER PAPER 126.48 243076 06/30/00 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.54 7,305.64 154643 07/31/00 000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 16568985 06/05/00 MSM&D-COPIER MAINT SVC 1,891.95 1,891.95 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154644 07/31/00 000032 KROLL MAP COMPANY INC 00032095 06/30/00 CDPL-KROLL MAPS 12.78 12.78 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154645 07/31/00 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY, EQU 018096 07/10/00 PKM-PAINT STORAGE CABI 832.01 832.01 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154646 07/31/00 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE CaMPA 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 154647 07/31/00 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE CaMPA 110448 07/09/00 PKM-WIRE CONNECTOR 12.71 Voucher: Bank Code: key 110450 07/09/00 PKM-DUCT TAPE 6.61 110540 07/11/0~ PKM-HAMMER/BROOMS 46.85 110556 07/11/00 PKCP-WASP/HORNET SPRAY 16.30 110623 07/12/00 PKM-6" SQ BLK GRATE/BE 8.97 110672 07/13/00 PKM-PVC FIP CAPS/BATTE 8.19 110678 07/13/00 PKM-6" SQ BLK GRATE/BE 8.97 110543 07/11/00 PKM-SHELVING MATERIALS 24.09 110838 07/16/00 PKM-CONCRETE BLOCK/SPR 6.09 110899 07/17/00 PKM-MISC HARDWARE 4.06 110890 07/17/00 PKM-RECIP BLADES/SPRIN 53.68 110667 07/13/00 PWS-CONÇRETE FORMS 12.18 110671 07/13/00 PWS-DUCT TAPE 6.64 110734 07/13/00 PWS-BOLTS:SIDEBOOM MOW 1. 27 110666 07/13/00 SWM-DUST/POLLEN MASK 5.84 110943 07/18/00 PKM-GALV NIPPLE/PVC 4.38 111025 07/19/00 PKM-OSCL SPRINKLER 5.42 111084 07/20/00 PKM-BLDG MATERIALS 32.12 110980 07/19/00 PKM-GALV NAILS 8.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 3 Cr- 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:38 Check .uist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154647 07/31/00 000043 154648 07/31/00 000051 **VOID** Voucher: 154649 07/31/00 000051 Voucher: NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC Bank Code: key PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC Bank Code: key 111204 111258 111129 002-141-10 102-141-10 109-922-10 177-159-10 170-120-20 319-041-10 439-922-10 519-842-10 8927601700 711-141-10 718-041-10 918-041-10 8925961000 954-567-10 040-699-00 153-835-10 454-132-10 534-132-10 544-132-10 644-132-10 654-132-10 744-132-10 934-132-10 8927666200 345-200-20 888-389-10 098-236-10 504-228-10 112-722-10 183-469-10 225-650-20 233-930-20 241-985-10 252-150-20 472-400-10 477-842-10 497-198-10 525-940-20 604 -13 0 - 2 0 625-940-20 652-017-10 07/24/00 PKCHB-2X4 STD BIR RD 07/25/00 PKCHB-EX HEAVY HASP/BO 07/21/00 PKM-WD-40/TUBES STEM L 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/05/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/10/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/10/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/10/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS èH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 06/22/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES Q7/10/00 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/10/00 PKRLS-ELECTRICITY/GAS 07/10/0Q PKCP-ELECTRICITY CHGS 07/10/00 MC-FACILITY ELECTRICIT 07/17/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/18/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 07/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/18/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/10/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/18/00 PWT-STR~ET LIGHTING 07/18/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/10/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/10/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/10/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/11/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 07/10/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING (continued) 5.67 15.73 5.54 300.06 0.00 51.89 6.74 1,277.60 5.47 242.25 50.77 1,349.18 3,767.68 98.41 5.47 230.12 143.32 33.37 16.41 22.95 14.79 97.38 334.72 68.03 80.73 175.24 180.86 119.14 201.69 3/772.91 282.32 196.48 2,604.03 161.89 113.33 130.75 119.71 132.47 98.66 75.04 131.39 97.37 155.95 191.06 245.43 151.64 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (,-r;; .-" Page: 4 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:38 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 ========================~=========================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154649 07/31/00 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC (continued) 733-930-20 07/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 127.36 753-129-10 07/21/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 93.54 786-203-10 07/10/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 100.56 886-203-10 07/10/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 91.30 889-288-10 07/11/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 23.98 925-940-20 07/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 154.49 727-469-10 07/21/00 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY 1,551.71 19,377.58 154650 07/31/00 000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER 21371 07/13/00 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 93.61 Voucher: Bank Code: key 21298 07/11/00 LAW-CARBONLESS PLEA FO 133.93 21166 06/29/00 LAW-CARBONLESS PLEA FO 164.52 21474 07/27/00 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 249.37 641. 43 154651 07/31/00 000061 WA STATE-REVENUE DEPARTMENT APR-JUN 20 07/20/00 MSF-REMIT SALES/USE Q2 14,169.38 14,169.38 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154652 07/31/00 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE 97768880 06/05/00 MSF-OFFICE SUPPLIES 164.82 Voucher: Bank Code: key 98301440 07/07/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES 35.33 98025300 06/20/00 PKM-UNDERDESK KEYBOARD 52.33 98440190 07/17/00 CDPL-OFFICE SUPPLIES 79.76 98474710 07/19/00 MC-CUSTOM STAMPS 55.06 387.30 154653 07/31/00 000089 NEWS TRIBUNE S507991000 07/05/00 CDBG-NOTICE:2001 FUNDS 163.40 163.40 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154654 07/31/00 000092 KING COUNTY-METROPOLITAN SV 17045 04/04/00 PWT-COMMUTE TRIP REDUC 6,595.25 Voucher: Bank Code: key 18461 07/12/00 PWT-COMMUTE TRIP REDUC 6,595.25 13,190.50 154655 07/31/00 000094 WA STATE-AUDITOR'S OFFICE L32552 07/20/00 MSF-99 AUDIT SVCS:JUN 14,782.69 14,782.69 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154656 07/31/00 000096 LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 0000099902 07/14/0Q PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 14.48 Voucher: Bank Code: key 0000101103 07/14/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 14.48 0001639103 07/14/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 393.00 0002926602 07/14/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 1,074.78 0002926402 07/14/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 220.78 0000080406 07/14/00 PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS 270.71 0002883701 07/14/00 PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS 48.63 0002890801 07/14/00 PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS 19.78 0002957001 07/14/00 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 14.48 0003050801 07/14/00 PKCP-WA¡ER/SEWER SVCS 7,987.75 0003075301 07/14/00 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 98.28 0003075401 07/14/00 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 142.82 0003075201 07/14/00 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 570.59 0001768602 07/14/00 PKDBC-SEWER SERVICE 541.54 0002830801 07/19/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 14.48 0002798301 07/19/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 64.41 0002781401 07/24/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS 104.46 11,595.45 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 5 (7--v 0 chklst 01/31/2000 07:28:38 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154657 07/31/00 000101 Voucher: 154658 07/31/00 000104 Voucher: 154659 07/31/00 000106 Voucher: 154660 07/31/00 000109 Voucher: 154661 07/31/00 000112 Voucher: 154662 07/31/00 000125 Voucher: 154663 07/31/00 000142 Voucher: 154664 07/31/00 000168 Voucher: PETTY CASH Bank Code: key LOGREYRA, EDELINE M Bank Code: key 008216 07/21/00 CDA-REIM PETTY CASH 06/16/00 06/22/00 06/22/00 06/23/00 06/26/00 06/30/00 07/03/00 07/05/00 07/10/00 07/12/00 07/11/00 07/12/00 07/13/00 07/14/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA12115 DC-INTERPRETER:CA10651 DC-INTERPRETER:CA09584 DC-INTERPRETER:CA10092 DC-INTERPRETER:CAl1862 DC-INTERPRETER:CA14652 DC-INTERPRETER:CA16039 DC-INTERPRETER:CA09453 DC-INTERPRETER:CA15712 DC-INTERPRETER:CA17121 DC-INTERPRETER:CA16040 DC-INTERPRETER:CA09453 DC-INTERPRETER:CA13150 DC-INTERPRETER:CA12115 07/11/00 PS-AIRFARE:ANDY HWANG 06/28/00 PKM-FALCON/BEST KEYS 07/06/00 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 07/06/00 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 07/18/00 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 07/07/00 PS-REPAIR ANTENNA CONN 07/14/00 MSFLT-HEATER SWITCH #4 07/14/00 MSFLT-SPARE KEYS #4824 0'6/1"6/00 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MA 04/10/00.PWS-MISC PARTS:BOMFORD 06/21/00 PS-KING CO JAIL SVCS 02/16/00 MSDP-KC NETWORK SVC FE 07/17/00 07/19/00 07/19/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 07/17/00 07/28/00 PS-WSLEFIA 2000 CONFER PS-EXPLORERS CONF:CANA PS-EXPLORERS CONF:ANDE PS-CALEA CONF:MONICO PS-CALEA CONF:PAYNTER PS-CALE~ CONF:B WILSON PS-CALEA CONF:POTTS PS-WSLEFIA 2000 CONF/S PWT-ITE MTG/ACCESS MGT 06/24/00 SWM-RFBOO-008 SEATAC M 118.23 118.23 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 120.00 40.00 100.00 40.00 40.00 80.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 40.00 750.00 CA12115FW CA10651FW CA09584FW CA10 0 92 FW CA11862FW CA14652FW CA16039FW CA09453FW CA15712FW CAl7121FW CA1604 OFW CA09453FW CA13150FW CA12115FW SELECT TRAVEL INC Bank Code: key 7111070 355.00 355.00 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12136 Bank Code: key 12145 12146 12161 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC Bank Code: key FOCS49590 FOW233639 FOW233624 16.42 79.30 33.41 25.08 154.21 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISIO 0045693 Bank Code: key 0028615 0051133 0009508 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE Bank Code: key TRA PS-HANSON PS-CANAAN PS-ANDERSO PS-MONICO PS-PAYNTER PS-WILSON PS-POTTS PS-SUMPTER PWT-PEREZ 110.77 10.62 210.04 331. 43 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE I 119579 Bank Code: key 19,978.19 1,424.68 158,416.08 1,433.52 122.00 131.00 131. 00 130.00 130.00 130.00 130.00 305.50 257.00 181,252.47 1,466.50 617.10 617.10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ b-l Page: 6 0 chklst 01/31/2000 07:28:38 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154665 07/31/00 000173 Voucher: 154666 07/31/00 000201 Voucher: 154667 07/31/00 000202 Voucher: 154668 07/31/00 000205 Voucher: 154669 07/31/00 000217 Voucher: 154670 07/31/00 000226 Vo'ucher: 154671 07/31/00 000228 Voucher: 154672 07/31/00 000229 Voucher: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 75407 06/30/00 LAW-BOOKS WESTLAW CHAR Bank Code: key 680-599-30 07/14/00 LAW-ZONING & PLAN REL# KINKO'S INC Bank Code: key 5151000512 5151000515 5151000516 5151000514 5151000510 5151000515 5151000517 5151000515 5151000515 5151000515 5151000518 5151000517 5151000514 06/21/00 07/10/00 07/13/00 07/05/00 06/12/00 07/11/00 07/19/00 07/11/00 07/12/00 07/12/00 07/25/00 07/25/00 06/30/00 07/05/00 06/29/00 07/10/00 07/14/00 07/11/00 07/10/00 07/17/00 06/29/00 06/29/00 06/29/00 06/29/00 07/25/00 CDA-PRINT:COLOR COPIES PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS CDHS-PRINTING SERVICES CDPL-PRINT:MARKET ANAL PS-PRINTING SERVICES PKRLS-PRINTING SERVICE PS-PRINTING SERVICES CDPL-PRINTING SERVICES PKP-COPIES/DRAFT PRCS PKP-COPIES/DRAFT PRCS PKA-COPIES:FINAL DRAFT PS-PRINTING SERVICES PKRCS-PRINTING:RWBF 253-815-99 07/04/00 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 253-630-15 06/29/00 MC-FAX MACHINE CHARGES 836.99 497.07 1,334.06 7.79 652.34 207.68 539.86 508.03 77.73 217.20 11.84 96.93 5.63 356.10 413.22 338.76 3,433.11 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS Bank Code: key GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER Bank Code: key 062930 062839 063039 063143 063060 063028 PS-TUNE UP/SYSTEM PERF PS-VEHICLE REPIARS MSFLT-BRAKES/BATTERY/L MSFLT-SHOCKS/BLOWER SW MSFLT-INTAKE HOSE FITT PS-TRANS SVC/LOF/WIPER FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 4-956-3626 06/19/00 CDPL-DELIVERY SERVICES Bank Code: key 4-958-4068 06/26/00 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES 4-964-0158 07/17/00 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES 4-964-0158 07/17/00 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES 52.83 20.40 73.23 Q2:AGOO-04 07/14/0Q CDHS-CHILD/FAMILY COUN FEDERAL WAY YOUTH & FAMILY Bank Code: key SOUTH KING CNTY MULTI SVC C Q2:AG99-70 07/14/00 CDDB-CARES CHILD CARE Bank Code: key Q1:AG99-70 05/17/00 CDDB-CARES CHILD CARE Q2:AGOO-04 07/12/00 CDHS-SHELTER/FAMILY SU Q2:AGOO-04 07/12/00 CDHS-LITERACY PROGRAM Q2:AGOO-04 07/12/00 CDHS-FOOD & CLOTHING FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERC Bank Code: key 4:AGOO-102 PS-CANAAN PS-RANSOM PS-TEMPLTO PS-SCHUBER 8:AG97-201 CM-TOUR~SM PROGRAM MGT PS-ADV LEADERSHIP CLAS PS-ADV LEADERSHIP CLAS PS-ADV LEADERSHIP CLAS PS-ADV LEADERSHIP CLAS CM-CHAMBER EXEC SALARY 132.41 744.18 665.00 380.45 102.65 126.99 2,151.68 17.95 30.60 14.70 81.70 144.95 16,902.66 16,902.66 15,165.43 21,363.75 8,322.25 3,000.00 7,152.84 833.33 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 6,250.00 55,004.27 8,683.33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 61- ~.J Page: 7 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:39 Check .ulst CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154673 07/31/00 000241 Voucher: 154674 07/31/00 000253 Voucher: 154675 07/31/00 000280 Voucher: 154676 07/31/00 000285 Voucher: 154677 07/31/00 000294 Vouch,er: 154678 07/31/00 000328 Voucher: 154679 07/31/00 000341 Voucher: 154680 07/31/00 000343 Voucher: 154681 07/31/00 000414 Voucher: 154682 07/31/00 000504 Voucher: 154683 07131/00 000514 Voucher: 154684 07/31/00 000515 Voucher: 154685 07t31/00 000533 Voucher: 154686 07/31/00 000541 Voucher: 154687 07/31/00 000555 Voucher: Q2:AGOO-05 07/12/00 CDHS-SEXUAL ASSAULT SV KING COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAUL,T Bank Code: key WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEP ATBO041115 04/11/00 PWS-PROJECT MGT S320/S Bank Code: key ATBO061309 06/13/00 PWS-GENERAL PROJECT MG 07/15/00 MSHR-EMPLOYMENT SECURI WA STATE-EMPLOYMENT SECURIT 684072-00 Bank Code: key FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT APR-JUN200 07/11/00 CDB-FIRE PERMIT FEES Bank Code: key VILMA SIGNS Bank Code: key ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) Bank Code: key SUNRISE SELF STORAGE Bank Code: key ELEPHANT CAR WASH Bank Code: key CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC Bank Code: key ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER Bank Code: key WA STATE-STATE REVENUES Bank Code: key 62900 06/29/00 PKRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS BA 0052313 0053389 0054487 06/15/00 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 06/30/00 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 07/15/00 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE 06/24/00 PS-STORAGE RENTAL FEE/ 7,280.00 7,280.00 433.53 822.51 1,256.04 13,801. 24 UNIT #A08 200-JUN 20 06/30/00 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE 3924 3925 3926 3927 07/13/00 PKDBC-RENTON DSHS 7/13 06/30/00 PKDBC-KENNEDY/JENKS CO 06/30/00 PKDBC-FW FIRE DEPT 6/2 06/30/00 PKDBC-PRCS MEETING 6/3 07/12/00 PKDBC-REPAIR BLOWER 070452 JUN 2000 07/05/0Ò MSF-REMIT STATE FEES 13,801. 24 15,272.04 15,272.04 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2060-006-9 07/04/00 PKRCS-FIRE PERMIT RWB Bank Code: key 1912GO0300 07/20/00 PKM-FIRE PERMT/STL LK PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES INC 15398 Bank Code: key 15405 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUT 213720 Bank Code: key 213720.2 07/21/00 PKM-S-200 MARKING CHAL 07/24/00 PKM-ATHLETIC PAINT 07/18/00 MSFLT-MOWER HUB #48403 07/19/00 MSFLT-MOWER STARTER/BL CRISIS CLINIC Bank Code: key Q2:AGOO-02 07/18/00 CDHS-TELEPHONE SERVICE 325.80 325.80 4,246.74 4,792.19 2,001.22 155.00 11,040.15 155.00 678.22 678.22 141.84 67.68 228.60 93.60 531.72 80.33 80.33 59,804.23 59,804.23 100.00 200.00 300.00 340.38 1,103.51 67.21 488.02 1,443.89 555.23 765.00 765.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CJl-Ú Page: 8 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:39 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Total Check Vendor -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 1,229.63 Date 154688 07/31/00 000560 Voucher: 154689 07/31/00 000564 Voucher: 154690 07/31/00 000568 Voucher: 154691 07/31/00 000570 Voucher: 154692 07/31/00 000588 Voucher: 154693 07/31/00 000618 Voucher: 154694 07/31/00 000630 Voucher: 154695 07/31/00 000652 Voucher: 154696 07/31/00 000664 Voucher: 154697 07/31/00 000671 Voucher: . 15469807/31/00 000695 Voucher: 154699 07/31/00 000721 Voucher: 154700 07/31/00 000724 Voucher: FEDERAL WAY PTSA COUNCIL Bank Code: key KING COUNTY PET LICENSE Bank Code: key AUBURN LAWN & EQUIPMENT Bank Code: key EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE Bank Code: key Invoice Inv.Date Description Q2:AGOO-05 07/12/00 CDHS-CLOTHING RESOURCE JUN 2000 27950-01 (DB 1004098 1004401 1004502 1004557 1004588 1004549 1004602 1004553 1004662 1004739 07/05/00 MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES 06/29/00 MSFLT-INSTALL SPARK PL 06/21/00 07/05/00 07/08/00 07/12/00 07/13/00 07/11/00 07/13/00 07/11/00 07/15/00 07/19/00 PS-TIRE REPAIR:M108995 PS-TRANS SVC/LOF:M4439 PS-WINDOW SVC:M88438 # PS-TRANS FLUID/ADJ HEA PS-TIRE REPAIR:M489 #4 PS-BRAKES:M84870 48614 PS-WIRE SET/DIST CAP/R PS-ALTERNATOR/STARTER: PS-BRAKE ROTORS/BRAKES PS-POWER STEERING PUMP 007-307-50 07/06/00 PKM-FACILITY WATER TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES Bank Code: key UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 7909997 Bank Code: key LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC Bank Code: key FWCCN Bank Code: key 48996 49122 49121 48997 06/28/00 PKM-PEAT MOSS/LAKOTA P 06/28/00 PKM-PRO GRO BLEND 07/06/00 PKM-LAKESIDE GRANDLITH 07/06/00 PKCP-MEDIUM BARK 06/28/00 PWS-DUMP WASTE DIRT Q2:AGOO-02 07/14/00 CDHS-TRANSITIONAL HOUS Q2:AGOO-02 07/13/00 CDHS-EMERGENCY SHELTER ACAP CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE Q2:AGOO-02 07/14/00 CDHS-PARENTING PROGRAM Bank Code: key Q2:AGOO-02 07/14/00 CDHS-SUBSIDIZED CHILD H D FOWLER COMPANY Bank Code: key WILSON TROPHY COMPANY Bank Code: key 882660 883375 885253 00-1331 0066935 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC Bank Code: key HOMEGUARD SECURITY SERVICES GJ5334 Bank Code: "key GJ5335 07/12/00 PKM-HUNTER I-20-ADS 07/13/00 PKM-DIRECT BURIAL WIRE 07/18/00 PKM-1" HARDIE VALVE 03/20/00 MSHR-CFrY LAPEL PINS 07/11/00 PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES 07/13/00 PKM-ALARM MONITORING 07/13/00 PKM-ALARM MONITORING Amount Paid 1,229.63 407.00 31. 44 13.29 107.49 13 9.57 53.17 13.29 368.97 142.34 336.74 546.43 315.69 278.97 145.80 324.17 181.33 215.84 325.20 1,000.00 2,500.00 1,061.00 2,000.00 97.40 60.70 91.06 434.40 215.84 19.95 19.95 407.00 31.44 2,036.98 278.97 145.80 1,046.54 3,500.00 3,061.00 249.16 434.40 215.84 39.90 ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 9 ----------- (;¡- '~ V 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:39 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ Date 154701 07/31/00 000730 Voucher: 154702 07/31/00 000732 Voucher: 154703 07/31/00 000783 Voucher: 154704 07/31/00 000792 voucl}er: 154705 07/31/00 000854 Voucher: 154706 07/31/00 000874 Voucher: 154707 07/31/00 000947 Voucher: 154708 07/31/00 000990 Voucher: 154709 07/31/00 000991 Voucher: 154710 07/31/00 001003 Voucher: 154711 07/31/00 001014 Voucher: 154712 07V31/00 001046 Voucher: 154713 07/31/00 001052 Voucher: 154714 07/31/00 001121 Voucher: Invoice ENTRANCO INC Bank Code: key 28595 28475 28476 28477 Inv.Date Description 06/28/00 PWS-23RD AVE S 317TH/S 06/23/00 PW-BELLE MEADOWS SUBDI 06/23/00 PW-FW CORPORATE SOUTH 06/23/00 PW-FRITO LAY EXPANSION 0005110000 06/01/00 PS-WASPC DUES:CHANEY 7,768.38 225.00 1,622.00 798.00 10,413.38 WASPC-WA ASSOC SHERIFFS & Bank Code: key FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL CO INC 6 007226 Bank Code: key BARRY'S TRUCKING & LANDS CAP 0867 Bank Code: key 0868 0866 0858 D J TROPHY Bank Code: key MACHINERY COMPONENTS INC Bank Code: key 202003A 202107A 06/30/00 PWSWR-LITTER DISPOSAL 07/18/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE/HAULING 07/18/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE/HAULING 07/19/00 PKCP-TRACK HOE WORK 07/12/00 PKDBC-REMOVE SHACK/DEB 07/13/00 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES 07/18/00 MSC-PLAQUE/ENGRAVING S 07/14/00 MSFLT-MOWER SPINDLE'S 07/18/00 MSFLT-OIL-TURF PROTECT 07/20/00 PS-JANITORIAL SERVICES 07/20/00 MC-JANITORIAL SERVICES 07/20/00 PKM-JANITORIAL SERVICE 07/06/00 CC-MEMBERSHIP DUES FY 07/25/00 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPPL CASCADE COFFEE INC Bank Code: key CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES Q2:AGOO-02 06/30/0Ô CDHS-EMERGENCY ASSISTA Bank Code: key 75.00 75.00 82258 82345 SQUEEGEE CLEAN WINDOW CLEAN 2524 Bank Code: key' 2527 2525 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCI 1021 Bank Code: key 20173790 SKCSRA-SOCCER REFEREES ASSO M35-SPRING 06/26/00 PKRLS-SOCCER OFFICIALS Bank Code: key M40-SPRING 06/26/00 PKRLS-SOCCER OFFICIALS EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION Bank Code: key 2654569 06/26/00 PS-CREDIT REPORTS 07/03/00 MSFLT-~PER BLADES #48 07/19/00 MSFLT-TRL LAMP/GLASS C 07/03/00 SWM-PULLER WWEE-WA WOMEN EMPLOY/EDUCAT Q2:AGOO-03 07/14/00 CDHS-JOB READINESS Bank Code: key Q2:AGOO-03 07/14/00 CDHS-COMPUTER APPLICAT 395.97 395.97 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY Bank Code: key 518233 521766 518243 380.10 304.08 1,612.71 2,117.70 6.52 21.07 4,414.59 27.59 376.14 97.73 473.87 1,275.00 660.00 630.00 2,565.00 23,454.00 23,454.00 97.73 97.73 766.00 766.00 1,195.00 1,195.00 21.72 2,390.00 21.72 16.70 15.93 13.78 46.41 4,688.40 1,500.00 6,188.40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6l - \I Page: 10 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:39 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice 1004-57603 07/13/00 PKDBC-CELL AIRTIME Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154715 07/31/00 001124 Voucher: 154716 07/31/00 001126 Voucher: 154717 07/31/00 001127 Voucher: 154718 07/31/00 001171 Voucher: 154719 07/31/00 001189 Voucher: 154720 07/31/00 001206 voucher: 154721 07/31/00 001218 Voucher: 154722 07/31/00 001233 Voucher: 154723 07/31/00 001241 Voucher: 154724 07/31/00 001259 Voucher: 154725 07/31/00 001263 Voucher: 154726 07/31/00 001267 vo¥cher: . 154727 07/31/00 001285 voucher: 154728 07/31/00 001297 Voucher: VERIZON WIRELESS Bank Code: key SENIOR SERVICES Bank Code: key COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS Bank Code: key MALLORY COMPANY Bank Code: key PETTY CASH Bank Code: key WSSUA-WA STATE SOFTBALL UMP 68 Bank Code: key 84 PUBLIC SECTOR JOB BULLETIN Bank Code: key AT & T BUSINESS SERVICE Bank Code: key WEST COAST AWARDS Bank Code: key Q2:AGOO-03 07/12/00 CDHS-MEALS ON WHEELS Q2:AGOO-03 07/10/00 CDHS-CONGREGATE MEAL P Q2:AGOO-03 07/07/00 CDHS-VOLUNTEER TRANSPO Q2:AG99-73 06/30/00 CDBG-DENTAL ACCESS PRO Q2:AGOO-04 07/14/00 CDHS-HEALTH SERVICES Q2:AGOO-04 07/14/00 CDHS-DENTAL SERVICES 1256052-01 07/14/00 PKM-SAFETY GLASSES 008172 008236 1811 07/18/00 CM-REIM PETTY CASH 07/25/00 CM-REIM PETTY CASH 06/01/00 PKRCS-SOFTBALL UMPIRE 07/03/00 PKRCS-SOFTBALL UMPIRE 07/11/00 MSHR-JOB AD:SWM MGR 0192199314 06/24/00 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 0510691538 06/15/00 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 0510678441 06/30/00 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 0510660202 07/07/00 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 36187 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS F JUN 2000 Bank Code: key MICHAELS STORES #8900 Bank Code: key TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC Bank Code: key ALPINE PRODUCTS INC Bank Code: key 0488 37330 62190 61569 62193 34200 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRA 030232 Bank Code: key 030425 030493 07/07/00 PKRCS-STAFF UNIFORMS 07/05/00 MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM 07/12/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 07/18/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 07/03/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 07/21/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES I 07/10/00 PWS-RED MARKING PAINT 06/15/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 07/15/00 PKDBC-LANDSCAPE MAINTE 07/15/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 21.01 21.01 2,000.00 375.00 922.50 3,297.50 2,500.00 7,500.00 3,750.00 62.62 13,750.00 62.62 249.18 179.16 428.34 6,600.00 9,328.00 15,928.00 313.20 313.20 80.23 26.41 16.00 15.88 138.52 129.23 129.23 1,219.67 1,219.67 17.33 17.33 28.53 22.37 44.80 6.77 102.47 27.76 27.76 1,156.83 804.73 748.53 2,710.09 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ VI-LJ. Page: 11 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:39 Check l.Jist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154729 07/31/00 001336 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC 1203387442 07/12/00 MSTEL-SYS MAINT 2,292.65 2,292.65 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154730 07/31/00 001374 AICPA-AMERICAN INSTITUTE CP 1526487 06/20/00 MSF-1 YR DUES:M MOSLEY 225.00 225.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154731 07/31/00 001411 POSTAL EXPRESS INC POSTAGE/JU 06/30/00 MSM&D-POSTAGE:CITY MAl 3,677.07 Voucher: Bank Code: key BM2006004 06/30/00 MSM&D-CITY COURIER SVC 1,806.62 5,483.69 154732 07/31/00 001424 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 308395 07/01/00 PKCHB-ELEVATOR MAINT S 110.10 110.10 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154733 07/31/00 001427 WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT H78744 07/03/00 MSFLT-FITTING/COUPLING 47.62 47.62 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154734 07/31/00 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 2895 06/29/00 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 664.36 Voucher: Bank Code: key 2923 06/29/00 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 408.23 1,072.59 154735 07/31/00 001436 TREE RECYCLERS PKM-JUL 6T 07/06/00 PKM-REMOVE DEAD TREES 130.32 Voucher: Bank Code: key PKM-JULY 6 07/06/00 PKM-TREE REMOVAL SVCS 130.32 260.64 154736 07/31/00 001470 ALLTELL COMMUNICATION PRODU 1197966 06/14/00 MSDP-DROP CABLES 3-FT 43.49 43.49 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154737 07/31/00 001552 PETTY CASH-KLCC REC DEPT 008214 07/20/00 PKRCS-REIM PETTY CASH 127.12 127.12 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154738 07/31/00 001601 TAK INC 4917 06/15/00 MSF-PRINT:BUS LICENSE 525.74 525.74 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154739 07/31/00 001612 POLLARD GROUP INC 47577 ~7/21/00 MSA-PRINT:FW ECONOMIC 14,540.42 14,540.42 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154740 07131/00 001618 SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW GLASS 1047011 07/10/00' PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR 27.10 27.10 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154741 07/31/00 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 143006 07/07/00 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 32.53 Voucher: Bank Code: key 131094 06/09/00 PS-BADGE CASES 75.15 138521 07/10/00 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 158.93 136859 07/07/00 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 97.69 137085-02 07/17/00 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 103.17 143070 07/17/00 PS-UNIF9RM CLOTHING 97.69 565.16 154742 07/31/00 001647 KELLER SUPPLY COMPANY 6789808 07/11/00 PKM-BATHROOM REPAIRS 144.78 Voucher: Bank Code: key 6802762 07/14/00 PKM-NEO SEAL GASKET 118.94 6809927 07/19/00 PKM-METAL SINKS 3,259.54 3,523.26 154743 07/31/00 001690 TOYS R US COO010938 07/10/00 PKRCS-SUPPLIES:PLAYGRD 96.07 96.07 Voucher: Bank Code: key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 12 61- \3 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:40 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ Date 154744 07/31/00 001748 Voucher: 154745 07/31/00 001802 Voucher: 154746 07/31/00 001805 Voucher: 154747 07/31/00 001843 Voucher: 154748 07/31/00 001870 Voucher: 154749 07/31/00 001893 Voucher: 154750 07/31/00 001898 Voucher: 154751 07/31/00 001902 Voucher: 154752 07/31/00 001988 Voucher: 154753 07/31/00 001990 Voucher: 154754 07/31/00 002137 Voucher: 154755 07/31/00 002204 Voucher: , . 154756 07/31/00 002231 Voucher: 154757 07/31/00 002263 Voucher: EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC Bank Code: key PACIFIC ELECTRONICS INC Bank Code: key Invoice 012381 012382 40094 40214 40198 00011462 Inv.Date Description 06/30/00 SWM-VACUUM/JET RODDING 06/30/00 SWM-VACUUM/JET RODDING 06/22/00 MSFLT-RADIO REPAIR #48 07/10/00 MSTEL-16 CHANNEL RADIO 07/11/00 MSTEL-REMOVE CELL PHON 07/07/00 PKM-LITTER CONTROL PRO VADIS NORTHWEST Bank Code: key MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE SVC #730KLCC-A 07/19/00 PKRLS-#730 KLCC RENTAL Bank Code: key #734/MC-AU 07/19/00 MC-9TH AVE BLDG LEASE #734/PS-AU 07/19/00 PS-9TH AVE BLDG LEASE FEDGO97 07/06/00 MSF-ADMIN MAINT FEE BANK OF NEW YORK Bank Code: key FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT SIF-JUN 20 07/05/00 MSF-REMIT IMPACT FEES Bank Code: key KING COUNTY FINANCE OFFICE Bank Code: key MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE Bank Code: key SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY Bank Code: key WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME MAT Bank Code: key INLAND FOUNDRY COMPANY INC Bank Code: key WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY Bank Code: key SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC Bank Code: key 18132 3151 3152 3153 713/6958 113/0500 K25076 24-88267 24-88514 96253 96265 96254 96246 3-H MANAGEMENT & CONSULTANT 200077 Bank Code: key 06/20/00 PWT-HOME FREE GUARANTE 07/02/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 07/02/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 07/02/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 07/13/00 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES 07/17/00 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL 07/07/00 SWM-VANED GRATES/FRAME 06/22/00 PKCP-BALLFIELD SUPPLIE 07/01/00 PKM-GRASS SEED/FERTILI 06/27/00 CDPL-ENV REV:CALVARY C 06/27/00 CDPL-ENV REV:POWELLS S 06/27/00 CDPL-ENV REV:ENTICKNAP 06/27/00 CDPL-ENV REV:STARKOVIC 07/20/00 MSGIS-CABLE TV CONSULT 2,707.89 2,909.38 124.20 751.14 75.60 5,617.27 950.94 4,225.00 4,225.00 476.34 5,629.00 19,408.79 25,514.13 101.78 101.78 14,298.00 14,298.00 115.00 115.00 1,719.28 1,748.55 108.60 3,576.43 25.05 25.05 63.03 63.03 1,351.75 1,351.75 643.84 238.70 882.54 323.00 405.00 375.60 53.50 1,157.10 1,420.00 1,420.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vl'- \ t Page; 13 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:40 Check .uist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154758 07/31/00 002297 Voucher: 154759 07/31/00 002426 Voucher: 154760 07/31/00 002534 Voucher: 154761 07/31/00 002545 Voucher: 154762 07/31/00 002548 Voucher: 154763 07/31/00 002566 Voucher: 154764 07/31/00 002567 Voucher: 154765 07/31/00 002644 Voucher: 154766 07/31/00 002645 Voucher: 154767 07/31/00 002649 Voucher: 154768 07/31/00 002679 Voucher: 154769 07/31/00 002741 Voucher: 154770 07(31/00 002781 Voucher: 154771 07/31/00 002916 Voucher: 154772 07/31/00 002966 Voucher: BOEDECKER COMPANY INC Bank Code: key UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY 6958 Bank Code: key 7570 ARBORS CAN INC Bank Code: key PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC Bank Code: key SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL Bank Code: key U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS Bank Code: key WEARGUARD Bank Code: key 1530 06/26/00 MSFLT-VEHICLE ENGINE S 430 431 07/10/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 07/14/00 PKRCS-RWB COTTON CANDY 07/13/00 PKM-PRUNING/REDUCTION 07/13/00 PKM-PRUNING/REDUCTION 226.79 226.79 42.33 106.43 148.76 58190 07/11/00 PKRLS-HVAC REPAIRS 1-76246 1-76174 07/03/00 PKM-PEST CONTROL SVCS 07/03/00 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC 423.54 423.54 847.08 TAC-3644-6 06/25/00 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD 42855001-1 06/22/00 PKRCS-UNIFORM JACKETS 42972518-1 07/12/00 PKM-STAFF UNIFORMS FEDERAL WAY BOYS & GIRLS CL Q2:AGOO-06 07/01/00 CDHS-OPERATING SUPPORT Bank Code: key BIRTH TO THREE DEVELOPMENT Bank Code: key WA STATE-REVENUE DEPT:MISC Bank Code:' key KANG, SAI C Bank Code: key BENTLER, KALPNA Bank Code: key CARLSON, AURORA Bank Code: key ... CANBER CORPS Bank Code: key RECYCLED PLASTIC MARKETING Bank Code: key Q2:AGOO-04 07/12/00 CDHS-FAMILY SVCS PROGR APR-JUN200 07/20/00 MSF-REMIT LEASEHOLD Q2 APR26-JUL1 07/17/00 MC-INTERPRETER:4/26-7/ CA14326FW Ó6/21/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA14326 CA12905FW 07/03/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA12905 CA15676FW 07/12/0~ DC-INTERPRETER:CA15676 CA09060FW 07/13/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA09060 CA15933FW 07/10/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA15933 160.19 160.19 APR3-JUN16 07/26/00 MSHR-EDUC ASSISTANCE 12974 13 04 7 13077 OS/24/00 PKCHB-LÅNDSCAPE MAINT 06/20/00 PKCHB-LANDSCAPE MAINT 06/23/00 PKCHB-LANDSCAPE MAINT 06/12/00 PKM-PLASTIC LUMBER 07/19/00 PKM-PLASTIC LUMBER 86.88 86.88 173.76 7915 8048 98.50 98.50 542.84 299.63 842.47 2,250.00 2,250.00 4,750.00 4,750.00 1,567.37 1,567.37 910.00 35.00 51.75 35.00 35.00 1,066.75 35.00 35.00 211.20 211.20 316.25 108.75 316.25 741. 25 468.70 242.98 711.68 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (;, - \Ç) Page: 14 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:40 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154773 07/31/00 002990 Voucher: 154774 07/31/00 002998 Voucher: 154775 07/31/00 003043 Voucher: 154776 07/31/00 003048 Voucher: 154777 07/31/00 003093 Voucher: 154778 07/31/00 00310~ Voucher: 154779 07/31/00 003129 Voucher: 154780 07/31/00 003138 Voucher: 154781 07/31/00 003170 Voucher: 154782 07/31/00 003211 Voucher: 154783 07/31/00 003221 Voucher: 154784 07/31/00 003301 Voucher: 154785 07/31/00 003304 Voucher: I . 154786 07/31/00 003305 Voucher: 154787 07/31/00 003376 Voucher: 154788 07/31/00 003444 Voucher: JAMESON BABBITT STITES & Bank Code: key FEDERAL WAY SIGN COMPANY Bank Code: key STEKLAR, OLEG K Bank Code: key 28917 SWM-SIGN CA14508FW PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DE 008218 Bank Code: key CASCADE COMPUTER MAINTENANC 9023801 Bank Code: key WOODS TONE CREDIT UNION Bank Code: key AMS LASER SUPPLY Bank Code: key NORMED Bank Code: key 2000-03B 2003-03A 301772 301771 07/12/00 LAW-PROF LEGAL SERV BA 07/05/00 SWM-BELMOR SIGN:R/D FA 07/11/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA14508 07/21/00 PS-REIM PETTY CASH 07/15/00 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT 07/07/00 PS-PANELS/PARTITIONS/S 07/03/00 PS-KEYPADS INSTALLED 07/21/00 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 07/21/00 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 12378-3293 07/10/00 PS-ANTISEPTIC GEL 40 0 12378-3291 07/06/00 PS-SANI-DEX HAND WIPES 12378-3304 07/19/00 PS-GLOVES, NEOPRO, PF MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 26191 Bank Code: key IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE INC Bank Code: key AVR PRODUCTIONS Bank Code: key MICRO WAREHOUSE INC Bank Code: key HWANG, ANDY Bank Code: key SPICUZZA, ANNETTE Bank Code: key KIRICHENKO, ALEX Bank Code: key WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS Bank Code: key 445014979 3351 06/28/00 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S 06/30/00 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE SV 06/19/00 PKRCS-RWB GENERATOR/CA P445910400 07/10/00 MSDP-ETHERNET PC CARDS APR12-MAY1 07/28/00 MSHR-EDUCATION ASSIST DEC1-FEB10 07/26/00 MSHR-EDUC ASSISTANCE MAR28-MAY2 05/02/00 MC-INTERPRETER:CA15433 MAY31-JUN3 06/30/00 PS-UNIFORM CLEANING 720.00 720.00 4/832.70 4/832.70 35.00 35.00 143.17 143.17 469.15 469.15 260.64 1/129.44 1,390.08 154.10 250.59 404.69 340.66 104.47 30.98 476.11 30.00 30.00 648.37 648.37 270.00 270.00 236.78 236.78 431.40 431.40 1/058.40 1/058.40 100.00 100.00 699.32 699.32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C1 1 .\t? Page: 15 0 chklst 01/31/2000 07:28:40 Check. ...,ist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Check Date Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154789 07/31/00 003466 Voucher: 154790 07/31/00 003532 Voucher: 154791 07/31/00 003563 Voucher: 154792 07/31/00 003565 Voucher: 154793 07/31/00 003600 Voucher: 154794 07/31/00 003645 Voucher: 154795 07/31/00 003697 Voucher: 154796 07/31/00 003718 Voucher: 154797 07/31/00 003736 Voucher: 154798 07/31/00 003800 Voucher: 154799 07/31/00 003837 Voucher: 154800 07/31/00 003846 Voucher: I \ 154801 07/31/00 003911 Voucher: 154802 07/31/00 003948 Voucher: 154803 07/31/00 003987 Voucher: LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY IN 178314 Bank Code: key BUCKLEY NURSERY COMPANY INC 1 Bank Code: key VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTE 0632 Bank Code: key 0597 0603 BEL CUSTOM CLEANERS (DBA) Bank Code: key SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES INC Bank Code: key 1271 07/13/00 PS-GUNSHOT RESIDUE KIT 06/25/00 SWM-WEEDING:BELMORE PK 07/13/00 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 06/26/00 PS-MDT MO MAINTENANCE 06/26/00 PS-LANGUAGE LINE USAGE 07/03/00 PS-UNIFORM DRY CLEANIN MSDP-PEARS 07/10/00 MS/PS-DATABASE TRAININ 10286 07/14/00 PS-USER CONFERENCE FEE AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE 1096-1097 Bank Code: key 1098 207413 07/24/00 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT 07/24/00 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT 07/08/00 SWM-UNIFORM CLOTHING SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS INC Bank Code: key JENKINS, HARDY & ASSOC, PLL JUL1-JUL31 07/25/00 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENDER SV Bank Code: key 4124 4666 4659 AVA (ASSN FOR VOLUNTEER ADM 0012-0WEN Bank Code: key NORTHWEST TOWING INC Bank Code: key UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Bank Code: key JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES Bank Code: key 06/06/00 PS-TOWING SERVICES 06/02/00 PS-TOWING SERVICES 06/14/00 PS-TOWING/STORAGE CHGS 06/13/00 PS-ICVA CONF REG FEE 0000F6588V 07/08/00 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 0000F80F48 07/08/0~ PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 0000F80F48 07/15/00 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 0000F6588V 07/15/00 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 07-8585 07/20/00 PS-INTERVIEW/INTERROGA 07-8568 07/19/00 PS-INTERVIEW/INTERROGA 07-8445/CR 07/19/00 PS-CREDIT:INV 07-8445 ENTERTAINMENT FIREWORKS INC 200098 Bank Code: key EDGEWOOD FIREPLACE SHOP INC 15768 Bank Code: key 15777 WINSTAR BROADBAND SERVICES Bank Code: key 348613 07/04/00 PKRLS-FIREWORKS DISPLA 07/13/00 PWS-POLY BLADES:WEEDEA 07/13/00 PWS-REPAIR BLOWER 07/07/00 MSDP-INTERNET ACCESS 94.95 94.95 2,502.14 2,502.14 150,691.00 450.00 115.20 151,256.20 2,366.94 2,366.94 350.00 350.00 700.00 1,779.55 617 . 50 2,397.05 235.72 235.72 16,102.00 16,102.00 267.97 110.77 450.69 829.43 350.00 350.00 9.60 9.90 3.70 13.50 36.70 550.00 525.00 -25.00 1,050.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 8.62 19.33 27.95 1,249.60 1,249.60 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C;t-rl Page: 16 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:40 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154804 07/31/00 004004 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC FOCS49045 06/22/00 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS 26.66 26.66 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154805 07/31/00 004090 CREATIVE MINDS 034702 06/27/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 24.28 24.28 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154806 07/31/00 004099 HARREUS, MARK JAN4-MAR15 07/26/00 MSHR-EDUC ASSISTANCE 202.00 202.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154807 07/31/00 004100 TUSCAN ENTERPRISES INC 309746 07/13/00 PS-LETTERING/GRAPHIC S 287.79 287.79 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154808 07/31/00 004113 LISA M READ CONSULTING UP399-0019 05/09/00 PW-DASHPOINT TOWNHOMES 2,720.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key UP399-0019 OS/25/00 PW-DASHPOINT TOWNHOMES 1,275.00 3,995.00 154809 07/31/00 004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERNATION 3446 06/20/00 PKRCS-PRINT:ARTS COMM 419.00 419.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154810 07/31/00 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC 111677 06/30/00 PKCHB-PARKING LOT SWEE 47.51 47.51 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154811 07/31/00 004234 ABT TOWING OF FEDERAL WAY I 30387 07/07/00 MSFLT-TOWING SERVICES 111.10 111.10 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154812 07/31/00 004245 JOSEPH FOUNDATION, THE Q2:AGOO-03 07/19/00 CDHS-NOYES TRANSITIONA 509.50 509.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 15481307/31/00 004258 WA STATE-DEPT OF LICENSING JUN16-JUL2 07/28/00 PS-REMIT CPL FEES 396.00 396.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154814 07/31/00 004265 WORLD VISION INC Q2:AGOO-03 07/13/00 CDHS-KIDREACH 2,333.00 2,333.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key . 154815 07/31/00 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 002152 06/03/00 CDPL-NOTICE:QUADRANT P 164.45 Voucher: Bank Code: key 002153 06/03/00 CDPL-NOTICE:ROADWAY AD 120.18 002154 06/03/00 CDPL-NOTICE:PLANNING C 50.60 002168 06/10/00 CDPL-NOTICE:LYSYUK SHO 126.50 002169 06/10/00 CDPL-NOTICE:ALBERTSON' 151.80 002170 06/10/00 CDPL-NOTICE:COSTCO GAS 151.80 002194 06/17/00 CDPL-NOTICE:SHORELINE 50.60 002195 06/17/00 CDPL-NOTICE:CITY TIP Y 113.85 002204 06/21/00 CDPL-NO~ICE:CELEBRATIO 88.55 002216 06/28/00 CDPL-NOTICE:FW CORP CE 151.80 002210 06/24/00 PWS-AD:TRAILER SURPLUS 120.18 002215 06/28/00 PWS-AD:SURPLUS TRAILER 91.13 002214 06/28/00 SWM-RFBOO-008:SEATAC M 236.93 002203 06/21/00 SWM-RFBOO-OO8:SEATAC M 271.98 002161 06/07/00 SWM-RFBOO-008 SEATAC M 261.23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 17 ~,-\D 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:40 Check .uist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154815 07/31/00 004270 154816 07/31/00 004273 Voucher: 154817 07/31/00 004288 Voucher: 154818 07/31/00 004317 Voucher: 154819 07/31/00 004344 Voucher: 154820 07/31/00 004368 Voucher: 154821 07/31/00 004382 Voucher: 154822 07/31/00 004395 Voucher: 154823 07/31/00 004397 Voucher: 154824 07/31/00 004412 Voucher: I 154825 07/31/00 004426 Voucher: 154826 07/31/00 004431 Voucher: FEDERAL WAY MIRROR DAY, JEFFREY K Bank Code: key LAKE TAPPS PRESSURE WASH Bank Code: key RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PHOTO Bank Code: key EMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM Bank Code: key SECOA Bank Code: key 002233 002244 002245 002246 002247 002248 002260 07/01/00 07/08/00 07/08/00 07/08/00 07/08/00 07/08/00 07/15/00 MSHR-JOB MSHR-JOB MSHR-JOB MSHR-JOB MSHR-JOB MSHR-JOB MSHR-JOB AD:SEASONAL P AD:LATERAL PO AD:TEMP ST MA AD:LAND USE P AD : SWM MGR AD:ASSOC PLAN AD:COURT CLER JUN26-JUL1 07/17/00 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENSE SVC 99-1510 1026023620 1026023700 1026022980 151322A 1026024870 1026027900 07/12/00 MSFLT-VEH CLEANING SVC 07/08/00 07/10/00 07/08/00 01/18/00 07/11/00 07/17/00 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC PS-CREDIT:1026020140 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC Q2:AGOO-03 07/14/00 CDHS-EMERGENCY FEEDING 704323 06/08/00 PKKFT-THEATRE LIGHTS 07/28/00 MSHR-REIM PETTY CASH PETTY CASH: WELLNESS COMMIT 008263 Bank Code: key CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL,' DI 8073-40247 07/05/00 PKKFT-LIGHTING SUPPLIE Bank Code: key NASRO-NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Bank Code: key MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC Bank Code: key FWOOl-3 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC Bank Code: key CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS SALE 072-00 Bank Code: key 095-00 07/11/00 PWT-PROJECT ENGNR SVCS 04/30/00 PS-SVC INSPECTIONS 05/31/00 PS-SVC INSPECTIONS 07/12/00 PS-MEMBER DUES:M LEDDY 06/27/00 06/27/00 06/27/00 06/27/00 06/27/00 06/27/00 CDPL-PHASE 1 ANNEXATIO CDPL-PLN EXP REV:QUADR CDPL-PLN REV:BELLE MEA CDPL-PLN REV;COTTAGES/ CDPL-PLN REV:FW CORP C CDPL-PLN REV:FEDWAY SO (continued) 110.80 83.10 138.50 166.20 138.50 166.20 110.80 3,065.68 750.00 PS-LEDDY 00002095 00002097 00002086 00002089 00002090 00002091 750.00 338.67 338.67 117.45 1.11 116.48 -86.77 175.43 42.61 366.31 1,462.50 1,462.50 2,076.08 2,076.08 183.09 183.09 388.35 388.35 3,380.22 3,380.22 1,756.43 1,502.54 20.00 3,258.97 20.00 840.00 105.00 480.00 60.00 565.20 514.80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ {' . In-lC1 Page: 18 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:41 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154826 07/31/00 004431 154827 07/31/00 004481 Voucher: 154828 07/31/00 004486 Voucher: 15482907/31/00 004488 Voucl)er: 154830 07/31/00 004578 Voucher: 154831 07/31/00 004594 Voucher: 154832 07/31/00 004628 Voucher: 154833 07/31/00 004659 Voucher: 154834 07/31/00 004820 Voucher: 154835 01/31/00 004825 Voucher: 154836 07/31/00 004840 Voucher: 154837 07/31/00 004842 Voucher: 154838 07/31/00 004849 Voucher: MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 00002092 00002094 00002096 00002087 06/27/00 CDPL-PLN EXP REV:FRITO 06/27/00 CDPL-PLN REV:KELLER SU 06/27/00 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV:DEVR 06/27/00 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV:FW C 07/01/00 PKCHB-PLANT MAINTENANC PS-JUL 9TH 07/09/00 PS-SHIRTS:FW LOGOS 1,380.00 600.00 1,271.40 390.00 135.75 97.22 936.00 850.83 823.06 97.74 190.05 155.30 80.00 50.00 336.00 777.68 574.22 275.00 275.00 1,500.00 27.10 27.10 126.50 27.10 102.17 102.17 102.17 707.25 119.46 310.49 (continued) 6,206.40 135.75 97.22 936.00 2,116.98 130.00 336.00 1,351.90 550.00 1,500.00 514.31 707.25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 19 INTERSCAPES INC Bank Code: key JONES & JONES Bank Code: key 15973 JUL17-JUL2 07/25/00 PKRCS-SINGING/DANCE CA SUNSHINE GENERATION Bank Code: key GENE'S TOWING INC Bank Code: key 181992 182927 183847 183732 182934 LIM, VANNARA Bank Code: key CA08398FW CA08398FW 06/05/00 PS-TOWING SERVICES 06/23/00 PS-TOWING SERVICES 06/23/00 PS-TOWING SERVICES OS/24/00 PS-TOWING SERVICES 05/06/00 PS-TOWING SERVICES 06/16/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA08398 07/10/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA08398 WA STATE PATROL IDENTIFICAT JUL5-JUL22 07/28/00 PS-REMIT CPL FEES Bank Code: key KAYE-SMITH BUSINESS GRAPHIC 352031 Bank Code: key 352032 ALLSTEEL INC Bank Code: key 156010 176412 07/14/00 MC-NOTICE OF CASE SETT 07/14/00 MC-WARRANT OF ARREST F 07/08/00 PS-HON6313BP72T CHAIR 07/19/00 PS-HON6313GG62T CHAIR SCHOOL-IN-LIEU Bank Code: key Q2:AGOO-03 07/06/00 CDHS-SCHOOL-IN-LIEU EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE Bank Code: key 99462 99464 99465 99476 99468 99473 99467 07/10/00 07/12/00 07/12/00 07/18/00 07/13/00 07/17/00 07/13/00 MSFLT-ELEC REPAIR #503 MSFLT-REMOVE CELL PHON MSFLT-INSTALL CELL PHO MSFLT-MISC REPAIR #900 MSFLT-REPL MICROPHONE MSFLT-~PL MICROPHONE MSFLT-REPL MICROPHONE Q2:AGOO-02 07/10/00 CDHS-ELDERHEALTH CONNE ELDERHEALTH NORTHWEST Bank Code: key SAM'S JANITORIAL SERVICE &, 43006 Bank Code: key 42210 07/05/00 PKCHB-MULTI-FOLD TOWEL 06/26/00 PKM-CAN LINERS/LATEX G \.;, - dO 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:41 I Check l.Jist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154838 07/31/00 004849 154839 07/31/00 004864 Voucher: 154840 07/31/00 004910 Voucher: 154841 07/31/00 004921 Voucher: 154842 07/31/00 004927 Voucher: 154843 07/31/00 004971 Voucher: 154844 07/31/00 004997 Voucher: 154845 07/31/00 005025 Voucher: 154846 07/31/00 005048 Voucher: 154847 07/31/00 005055 Voucher: 154848 07/31/00 005066 Vôucher: 154849 07/31/00 005098 Voucher: 154850 07/31/00 005133 Vohcher: 154851 07/31/00 005160 Voucher: 154852 07/31/00 005167 Voucher: 154853 07/31/00 005287 Voucher: SAM'S JANITORIAL SERVICE &, STOP STICK Bank Code: key FILETEX LLC Bank Code: key CLOWNS UNLIMITED INC Bank Code: key STAR RENTALS AND SALES Bank Code: key KRONOS, INC Bank Code: key APPIAN CONSTRUCTION INC Bank Code: key PCCI Bank Code: key 43139 10892 00-209 00-210 00-204 27424 27102 PKRCS-JUL 07/19/00 PKM-MULTI-FOLD TOWELS/ 07/14/00 PS-REPLACEMENT FEE 06/30/00 CDA-COLOR CODED LABELS 07/03/00 CDA-FILE/MAP STORAGE B 06/21/00 CDA-LASER LABELS 07/10/00 PKRCS-RWB WRISTBANDS 07/04/00 PKRCS-RWB EQP RENTAL 07/19/00 PKRCS-RWB TICKET SALES 33-008214- 07/06/00 PKRCS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL 33-008215- 07/06/00 PKRCS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL 965122 902633 20998-36 7100/3 1728 01/31/00 MSDP-TIMEKEEPING SYSTE 07/14/00 MSDP-TIMEKEEPING SYSTE 07/14/00 PKC-INSTALL PAVERS:CP 07/01/00 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SVCS 06/29/00 PKDBC/KFT-CLEAN CARPET DUPONT FLOORING SYSTEMS Bank Code: key R W THORPE & ASSOCIATES INC JAN1-JAN28 01/28/00 PKC-OPEN SPACE COMP PL Bank Code: key PROFESSIONAL TRAINING Bank Code: key 825529-R1 PYRAMID TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO 227910D Bank Code: key 227924D NAM, HWASOOK B Bank Code: key MOSELEY, DAVID Bank Code: key VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER PLLC Bank Code: key AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS & Bank Code: key CA07634FW 06/13/0Q CDA-1 YR SUBSCRIPTION 07/02/00 MSFLT-LOF/BRAKE FLUID/ 07/03/00 MSFLT-RHS TIE ROD END: 07/05/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA07634 JUN21-JUN3 07/11/00 CM-MILE~GE REIMBURSEME 284545 D6417 07/11/00 PS-PRE-EMPLOY PHYSICAL 07/01/00 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT 318.52 (continued) 748.47 7.00 7.00 44.05 78.35 35.45 157.85 108.60 1,350.00 4,056.00 5,514.60 55.39 285.18 340.57 9,122.40 6,923.25 75.00 16,045.65 75.00 1,796.00 1,796.00 334.49 334.49 172 . 55 172.55 48.00 48.00 135.95 126.42 262.37 50.00 50.00 191.75 191.75 57.17 57.17 84.50 84.50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 20 (1- J. \ 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:41 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Check vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154854 07/31/00 005293 Voucher: 154855 07/31/00 005302 Voucher: 154856 07/31/00 005313 Voucher: 154857 07/31/00 005321 Voucher: 154858 07/31/00 005330 Voucher: 154859 07/31/00 005341 Voucher: 154860 07/31/00 005364 Voucher: 154861 07/31/00 005388 Voucher: 154862 07/31/00 005392 Voucher: 154863 07/31/00 005417 Voucher: 154864 07/31/00 005421 Voucher: 154865 07V31/00 005436 Voucher: 154866 07/31/00 005437 Voucher: 154867 07/31/00 005450 Voucher: PEOPLE'S TRANSLATION SERVIC CA08459FW Bank Code: key RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC 2953 Bank Code: key SHRED-IT WESTERN WASHINGTON 10524914 Bank Code: key TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES Bank Code: key ADVANCED LAW ENFORCEMENT Bank Code: key DODD, ESCOLASTICA R Bank Code: key SHELBY WILLIAMS INDUSTRIES Bank Code: key PURE WATER CORPORATION Bank Code: key WAYNE INVESTIGATIONS Bank Code: key SCARFF FORb Bank Code: key BARGER, KENNETH Bank Code: key DBL DISTRIBUTING INC Bank Code: key BIKE TECH Bank Code: key SILHOUETTE Bank Code: key 6717519 07/07/00 MC-INTERPRETER:CA08459 07/02/00 PWS-2000 ROW LANDSCAPE 07/12/00 PS-ON-SITE SHREDDING S d7/06/00 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES PS-SUMPTER 06/24/00 PS-LAW ENFORCEMENT CAM PS-HANSON 06/24/00 PS-LAW ENFORCEMENT CAM JUN7-JUN28 07/03/00 MC-INTERPRETER:JUN7-28 66446 139720 140558 140524 139700 139680 139734 0003 06/06/00 PKKFT-TABLES:LOBBY 06/30/00 06/30/00 06/30/00 06/30/00 06/30/00 06/30/00 PKCHB-BOTTLED WATER MC-WATER/COOLER RENTAL PKM-WATER/COOLER RENTA PKDBC-WATER/COOLER REN PKKFT-WATER/COOLER REN PKRCS-WATER/COOLER REN 07/25/00 CDB-LEGAL PROCESS SERV STOCK Y197 07/11/0~ MSFLT-FORD FOCUS#48302 60.00 60.00 13,872.65 13,872.65 CA12045FW CA17121FW CA07839FW 948256 48341 PKRCS-AUG 06/28/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA12045 07/06/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA17121 07/19/00 MC-INTERPRETER:CA07839 07/07/00 PS-TAPE RECORDERS 06/15/00 PS-TRE~ 7000 BIKES 06/21/00 PKRCS-SUMMER CONCERT 145.20 145.20 145.31 145.31 575.00 575.00 1,150.00 590.00 590.00 1,382.90 1,382.90 179.51 2.17 37.41 72.75 11.78 11.78 315.40 620.00 620.00 12,664.00 12,664.00 40.00 60.00 40.00 140.00 295.43 295.43 2,243.66 2,243.66 600.00 600.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------___L__------------------ 61- doJ Page: 21 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:41 Check .uist . CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154868 07/31/00 005451 Voucher: 154869 07/31/00 005465 Voucher: 154870 07/31/00 005467 Voucher: 154871 07/31/00 005468 Voucher: 154872 07/31/00 005469 Voucher: 154873 07/31/00 005473 Voucher: 154874 07/31/00 005478 Voucher: 154875 07/31/00 005479 Voucher: 154876 07/31/00 005484 Voucher: 154877 07/31/00 005489 Voucher: 154878 07/31/00 005490 Voucher: 154879 07'/31/00 005492 Voucher: 154880 07/31/00 700071 Voucher: 154881 07f31/00 700130 Voucher: 154882 07/31/00 700346 Voucher: 154883 07/31/00 700402 Voucher: PKRCS-AUG 06/21/00 PKRCS-SUMMER CONCERT RAINY PASS Bank Code: key INSIGHTS TRAINING CENTER IN PS-TRAININ 07/06/00 PS-ACTIVE SHOOTER RESP Bank Code: key 423444 07/18/00 MSDP-SECURE WEB SITE S VERISIGN INC Bank Code: key INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION 0 PS-HARTFIE 07/12/00 PS-DUES:C HARTFIELD Bank Code: key JONES, KEVIN L Bank Code: key RASOIE CUISINE OF INDIA Bank Code: key LEBEL, SHELLEY Bank Code: key PARTY'S BY MEL Bank Code: key CALHOON, SUSAN Bank Code: key METRO TRANSIT Bank Code: key PKRCS-JUL 07/04/00 PKRCS-RWBF DJ MUSIC CM-JUN 24T 06/24/00 CM-FOOD:DIVERSITY RETR PKRCS-JUN 07/11/00 PKRCS-REIM RWB ART/CRA PKRCS-JULY 07/05/00 PKRCS-RWFB EQP RENTAL PKRCS-JUL PS-NEAL NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION CENTE 38828 Bank Code: key DEBT BUSTERS Bank Code: key MOSS, YANDLE Bank Code: key WAEYC Bank Code: key CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH Bank Code: key CARY LANG CONSTRUCTION Bank Code: key PKRCS-JUN 700071 07/12/00 PKRCS-RWBF IRISH DANCE 05/09/00 PS-CBN COURSE: S NEAL ~7/18/00 MC-BURSTER 06/29/0~ PKRCS-FINANCIAL CLASSE 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 Cl180R5661 07/19/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE/RE 99-0271 07/26/00 CD-SIGN'INCENTIVE PROG ROW97-0177 07/21/00 PWS-RELEASE ROW97-0177 400.00 400.00 500.00 500.00 349.00 349.00 25.00 25.00 200.00 200.00 120.56 120.56 70.41 70.41 262.00 262.00 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 3,349.00 3,349.00 359.80 359.80 38.78 38.78 335.89 335.89 1,523.12 1,523.12 57.60 57.60 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (;1- d ~ Page: 22 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:41 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154884 07/31/00 700406 Voucher: 154885 07/31/00 700548 Voucher: 154886 07/31/00 700563 Voucher: 154887 07/31/00 700593 Voucher: 154888 07/31/00 700619 Voucher: 154889 07/31/00 700712 Voucher: 154890 07/31/00 700821 Voucher: 154891 07/31/00 700945 Voucher: 154892 07/31/00 701038 Voucher: 154893 07/31/00 701098 Voucher: 154894 07/31/00 701183 Voucher: 154895 07/31/00 701235 Voucher: 154896 07/31/00 701334 Vo~cher: 154897 07/31/00 701335 Voucher: 154898 07/31/00 701348 Voucher: 154899 07/31/00 701349 Voucher: CELMER, HEIDI Bank Code: key HOLY INNOCENTS CHAPEL FUND Bank Code: key QUADRANT CORPORATION Bank Code: key INTACOMMUNICATION NETWORK, Bank Code: key OLSON, DAVID M Bank Code: key LARSON, JUDY M Bank Code: key TAPIA, STEVE S Bank Code: key RST ENTERPRISES, INC Bank Code: key CRUMB, KEITH & PAULA Bank Code: key LIUKKONEN, BETTY L Bank Code: key ECKERT, DALE A Bank Code: key BEIDLEMAN, CATHY Bank Code: key COLUMBIA HOMES Bank Code: key TOUCHSTONE HOMES INC Bank Code: key TAYLOR RENTALS Bank Code: key COLON, GLORIA Bank Code: key JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 99-104674- 07/19/00 CDPL-REFUND 99-104674- 00-101166- 06/29/00 COB-REFUND 00-101166-0 98-103034- 06/29/00 COB-REFUND 98-103034-0 BLD98-0504 06/29/00 COB-REFUND BLD98-0504 SEP99-006 07/19/00 CDPL-REFUND SEP99-0006 ROW97-0387 07/21/00 PWS-RELEASE ROW97-0387 PW-APPRAIS 06/23/00 PWS-REIM APPRAISAL FEE 700712 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 23.90 23.90 920.00 920.00 JUROR ID 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 00-100684- 07/26/00 CD-SIGN INCENTIVE PROG 302104-910 04/05/00 SWMCIP:PROPERTY EASEME JUROR ID 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 JUROR 10 2 07/20/0~ MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 701235 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 2,000.00 700.00 3,750.00 3,078.40 9,528.40 30.00 ROW97-0475 07/21/00 PWS-RELEASE ROW97-0475 ROW97-0537 07/21/00 PWS-REL~ASE ROW97-0537 99-0129 06/30/00 CD-SIGN INCENTIVE PROG 30.00 200.00 200.00 01-35450 07/14/00 MSF-REFUND ENT LIC FEE 55.60 55.60 11.95 11.95 256.10 256.10 1,000.00 1,000.00 26.50 26.50 25.20 25.20 23.90 23.90 600.00 600.00 227.50 227.50 1,934.81 1,934.81 25.00 25.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 23 (-¡ .- /. \.) I 0 0 chklst 01/31/2000 07:28:41 Check List CITY OF F~DERAL WAY Page: 24 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154900 07/31/00 701350 GARY ADAMS CPA PS 01-35494 07/17/00 MSF-REFUND LICENSE FEE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154901 07/31/00 701351 PUYALLUP MAIN ST ASSOCIATIO Cl171R5517 07/19/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 75.50 75.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154902 07/31/00 701352 GINTZ, INGRID C1256R6051 07/19/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 150.00 150.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154903 07/31/00 701353 PYUNG AN PRESBYTERIAN CHURC 66171 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND RENTAL DE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154904 07/3~/00 701354 RAINIER VISTA BOYS & GIRLS 68069 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND RENTAL DE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154905 07/31/00 701355. RADER, MARCIE 63143 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND REC CLASS 52.00 52.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154906 07/31/00 701356 HONG, KEON PYO 64772 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND REC CLASS 30.00 30.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154907 07/31/00 701357 YATES, JANE 65607 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND REC CLASS 32.00 32.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154908 07/31/00 701358 HANJIN SHIPPING 60197 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND RENTAL DE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154909 07/31/00 701359 SAFE WORKS LLC 61356 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND RENTAL DE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154910 07/31/00 701360 JONES, NICOLE 66628 07/18/00 PKRLS-REFUND REC CLASS 12.00 12.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key . 154911 07/31/00 701361 BREWER, MARGARET 65995 07/18/00 PKRLS-REFUND REC CLASS 24.00 24.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154912 07/31/00 701362 KUBITZ, MARY 68026 07/13/00 PKRLS-REFUND REC CLASS 27.73 27.73 Voucher: Bank Code: key I . 154913 07/31/00 701363 LONGSON, JEANE 65300 07/18/00 PKRLS-REFUND REC CLASS 56.00 56.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key I 154914 07/31/00 701365 MYLES, VICTORIA 68438 07/18/00 PKRLS-REFUND RENTAL DE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154915 07/31/00 701366 MILLER I JANET 69240 07/24/00 PKRLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 42.00 42.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 24 G1-Jr? 0 chklst 01/31/2000 07:28:41 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 25 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154916 07/31/00 701367 KYE, MISOOK 65472 07/24/00 PKRLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 13.00 13.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154917 07/31/00 701368 BLAKE, SHANROY L JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 22.60 22.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154918 07/31/00 701369 LONG, RYAN M A JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 21.30 21.30 Voucher: Bank Code: key 15491907/31/00 701370 SHEEHAN, MARC JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 25.20 25.20 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154920 07/31/00 701371 LITTLE, FREDDIE JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 12.60 12.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154921 07/31/00 701372 LEROUEIL, CHRISTINE JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 26.50 26.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154922 07/31/00 701373 CLAUNCH, KAREN JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 10.65 10.65 Voucher: Bank Code: key 15492307/31/00 701374 MARKS, PAULA JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 12.EjO 12.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154924 07/31/00 701375 DOCKSTADER, BEVERLY JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 11.95 11.95 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154925 07/31/00 701376 BACON, VICTORIA JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 26.50 26.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154926 07/31/00 701377 POOLE, JAY JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 37.80 37.80 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154927 0?/31/00 701378 FULLMER, PAUL JUROR 10 2 07/20/0Ò MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 25.20 25.20 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154928 07/31/00 701379 PARTAIN, RITA L JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 23.90 23.90 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154929 07V31/00 701380 QUINT, IRA JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 26.50 26.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154930 07/31/00 701381 DURANT, JUDITH JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 23.90 23.90 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154931 07/31/00 701382 BOX, LEOTA JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 25.20 25.20 Voucher: Bank Code: key , ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 25 (,1' -:~ lo ~ 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:41 Check l.Jist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 26 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154932 07/31/00 701383 GAGNIER, CHRISTY JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 11.30 11.30 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154933 07/31/00 701384 LEFEVRE, MARGIE JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 25.20 25.20 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154934 07/31/00 701385 WELCH, LISA JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 21.30 21.30 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154935 07/31/00 701386 HARVEY, RHONDA JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 27.80 27.80 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154936 07/31/00 701387 YORK, GELEAH JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 12.60 12.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154937 07/31/00 701388 YOSHIZUMI, ANNIE JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 22.60 22.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154938 07/31/00 701389 SCOTT, RICHARD JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 23.90 23.90 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154939 07/31/00 701390 CHRISTENSEN, SAMUEL JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 23.90 23.90 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154940 07/31/00 701391 SMITH, EUGENE JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 23.90 23.90 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154941 07/31/00 701392 01 LORETO, ANTHONY JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 22.60 22.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154942 07/31/00 701393 DELANEY, ROY JUROR 10 2 q7/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 17.80 17.80 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154943 Or/31/00 701394 CROSSMAN, WILLIAM JUROR 1D 2 07/20/06 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 25.20 25.20 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154944 07/31/00 701395 TEDDER, CINDY JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 22.60 22.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154945 07V31/00 701396 QUINTO, BONIFACIO JUROR ID 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 22.60 22.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154946 07/31/00 701397 SMITH, KENNETH JUROR 10 2 07/20/00 MC-JUROR FEE:7/17-20 25.20 25.20 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154947 07/31/00 701399 JOHNSONS BENOVELANT FOUNDAT 01-35650 07/26/00 MSF-REFUND LICENSE FEE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 26 C1 - Jl 0 chklst 07/31/2000 07:28:42 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 27 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154948 07/31/00 701400 BLOM, NORMAN K 701400 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 41.70 41.70 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154949 07/31/00 701401 COOK, DERECK E 701401 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 46.00 46.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154950 07/31/00 701402 COWEN, LEROY EMERSON 701402 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 24.55 24.55 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154951 07/31/00 701403 DAVELAAR, SHELLY MARIE 701403 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 37.80 37.80 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154952 07/31/00 701404 DENNIS, TRACI A 701404 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 24.45 24.45 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154953 07/31/00 701405 DURAN, JAMES P 701405 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 41.70 41.70 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154954 07/31/00 701406 EADIE, HALLIE V 701406 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 46.50 46.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154955 07/31/00 701407 FINCALERO JR, PEDRO KUIZON 701407 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 37.80 37.80 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154956 07/31/00 701408 GRIMES, EVERETT DONALD 701408 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 49.50 49.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154957 07/31/00 701409 GUSTAFSON, JAMES M 701409 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 23.90 23.90 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154958 07/31/00 701410 HALLMON, AMYC 701410 ~7/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 59.25 59.25 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154959 07(31/00 701411 HANSEN, ROBERT JOHN 701411 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 59.50 59.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154960 07/31/00 701412 HARVEY, JOHN M 701412 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 37.80 37.80 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154961 07131/00 701413 HSU, JOHN M 701413 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 53.00 53.00 Voucher: Bank Code:' key 154962 07/31/00 701414 HAUGE, RICHARD N 701414 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 33.90 33.90 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154963 07/31/00 701415 HENDRIE, JEANNE K 701415 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 49.50 49.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 27 L1 - J\f:; 0 chklst 01/31/2000 07;28;42 Check .uist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page; 28 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154964 07/31/00 701416 Voucher; 154965 07/31/00 701417 Voucher; 154966 07/31/00 701418 Voucher; 154967 07/31/00 701419 Voucher: 154968 07/31/00 701420 Voucher; 154969 07/31/00 701421 Voucher; 154970 07/31/00 701422 Voucher; 154971 07/31/00 701423 Voucher; 154972 07/31/00 701424 Voucher: 154973 07/31/00 701425 Voucher: 154974 07/31/00 701426 Voucher; 154975 Or/31/00 701427 Voucher: 154976 07/31/00 701428 Voucher; 154977 07Y31/00 701429 Voucher; 344 Checks in this report HONG, LE NGOC Bank Code; key 701416 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE;7/17-21 34.88 34.88 37.80 37.80 HUMMEL, BILLIE R Bank Code; key JACOBS, MYRON P Bank Code; key 701417 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE;7/17-21 35.85 35.85 701418 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE;7/17-21 45.60 45.60 MCCONNELL JR, MICHAEL Bank Code; key 701419 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE;7/17-21 53.00 53.00 MCGREGOR, LOLA VIOLA Bank Code; key 701420 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 37.80 37.80 MURRAY, SHIRLEY S Bank Code: key 701421 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE:7/17-21 47.55 47.55 HELIEMES, RICHARD Bank Code; key 701422 07/24/00 DC-JUROR FEE;7/17-21 39.00 39.00 WDF INC Bank Code; key SLAVIK GOSPEL CHURCH Bank Code: key 00-103688- 07/14/00 CDB-REFUND 00-103688-0 557.00 557.00 00-100702- 07/21/00 PW-REFUND 00-100702-00 VILLAGE CONCEPTS INC Bank Code; key C1277R6097 07/25/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 46.83 46.83 00-100465- 07/26/00 CD-SIGN INCENTIVE PROG BIG FOOT RESTAURANTS INC Bank Code; key STUART ANDERSON'S BLACK ANG 00-100665- 07/27/0G CD-SIGN INCENTIVE PROG Bank Code; key 98-101283- 07/19/00 CDPL-REFUND 98-101283- LYSYUK, VLADIMIR Bank Code: key CAMPBELL, MICHAEL C & KELLY BLA99-0008 07/19/00 CDPL-REFUND BLA99-0008 Bank Code: key 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 283.68 283.68 673.37 673.37 ------------------ Total Checks; 1,222,051.56 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C1 - ]°1 Page: 28 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:53 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154978 08/02/00 005079 ANDERSON, SHELLY DEC16-JUL3 08/02/00 PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEME 400.00 400.00 voucher: Bank Code: key 154979 08/07/00 701442 FIR ASSOCIATES 0921049030 08/07/00 PW-PROPERTY ACQUISITIO 1,025.00 1,025.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154980 08/07/00 701442 FIR ASSOCIATES 0921049276 08/07/00 PW-PROPERTY ACQUISITIO 250.00 250.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154981 08/08/00 701398 ROLAND, WANDA AND 00-01-0911 08/08/00 MSRM-SETTLEMENT 6,000.00 6,000.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154982 08/14/00 000862 KING COUNTY PARKS & RECREAT 2135 08/02/00 PWA-RETREAT PARK FEE 55.00 55.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154983 08/15/00 000002 SOUND VIEW AUTO BODY INC 1721 07/31/00 MSFLT-PAINT/BODY REPAI 1,354.42 1,354.42 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154984 08/15/00 000011 CITY OF AUBURN 76436 07/13/00 PKRLS-SOFTBALL INVITAT 25.00 25.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154985 08/15/00 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY, EQU 018499 07/19/00 PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER 14.63 14.63 Voucher: Bank Code: key 154986 08/15/00 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE CaMPA 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 154987 08/15/00 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE CaMPA 110921 07/18/00 PKCP-SPRAY UNIT/SAW/BO 69.59 Voucher: Bank Code: key 111083 07/20/00 PKCP-HOSE ADAPTOR/SUPP 7.75 111138 07/21/00 PKCP-IRRIGATION SUPPLI 16.18 111113 07/21/00 PKCP-PIPE/COUPLING/ADA 9.23 111196 07/24/00 PKM-WORK GLOVES 6.83 111195 07/24/00 PKM-WORK GLOVES 12.68 111336 07/26/00 PKM-BRUSH/MIX CONTAINE 13.54 111383 07/27/00 PKM-13PC SOCKET SET/BL 33.74 111343 07/26/00 PKCHB-PAINT TRAY/ROLLE 91.22 111363 07/26/00 PKCHB-PLYWOOD/BLDG MAT 28.12 111372 07/27/00 PKCHB-HARDBOARD-TEMPER 10.74 111193 07/24/00 PWS-UTILITY LIGHTER 3.90 111037 07/20/00 PWS-PRE-MIX CONCRETE/K 15.77 111661 08/01/00 PWS-WD,O 8 OZ PLUS 20.72 111671 08/02/00 PWS-GLOVES/ALLWAY FLEX 21.73 111681 08/02/00 PWS-U-BOLTS 1. 94 111787 08/03/00 PKCHB-FINISH NAILS 1. 37 111967 08/07/00 PKCHB-WOOD DOWEL/MTG S 3.50 111657 08/01/00 PKM-PRO SLEDGE HANDLE 10.06 111618 08/01/00 PKM-ROLLER COVER/AS PH 12.01 111779 08/03/00 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIE 4.34 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~--------------- Page: 1 f.- "0 \.);- -:J 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:54 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154987 08/15/00 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA (continued) 111763 08/03/00 SWM-BALL VALVE 16.78 111875 08/04/00 PKM-MISC SCREWS/BOLTS 15.25 111992 08/07/00 SWM-FUNNEL 0.83 112126 08/09/00 PKM-5/8 SPRING SNAPS 8.59 436.41 154988 08/15/00 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 154989 08/15/00 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 954-567-10 07/24/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 5.47 Voucher: Bank Code: key 8926456900 07/24/00 PKDBC/KFT-NATL GAS 263.66 177-159-10 08/04/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH 5.47 004-919-10 06/08/00 SWM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 26.88 004-919-10 07/10/00 SWM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 24.88 112-722-10 08/08/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 165.02 141-467-10 08/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 163.75 177-437-10 08/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 95.46 190-977-00 07/28/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 126.60 221-220-20 07/12/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 6.10 233-930-20 08/08/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 128.64 241-985-10 08/08/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 142.69 359-540-20 07/13/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 19.76 373-087-10 08/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 108.86 420-530-20 07/13/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 92.55 458-148-10 08/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 208.42 487-650-20 07/13/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 165.95 504-368-10 08/07/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 5.20 525-940-20 08/08/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 170.69 669-650-20 07/13/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 258.08 720-429-10 08/04/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 106.95 733-829-10 08/04/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 95.78 733-930-20 08/08/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 140.13 755-430-20 08/04/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 79.20 895-405-10 07/14/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 119.08 917-259-10 08/04/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 63.74 925-940-20 08/08/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 169.94 993-440-20 07/26/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 143.32 062-691-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 13.57 131-066-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 10,246.55 342-691-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 93.93 352-691-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 25.80 442-691-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 25.80 536-673-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 232.20 638-448-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 78.19 657-289-00 08/03/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 6.10 736-169-10 08/01/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 122.90 738-448-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 58.64 904-388-10 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 113.33 996-289-00 08/02/00 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 114.61 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 2 G1'- :) I 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:0S:54 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 1549S9 OS/15/00 000051 154990 OS/15/00 000063 Voucher: 154991 OS/15/00 000075 Voucher: 154992 OS/15/00 0000S3 Voucher: 154993 OS/15/00 000096 Voucher: 154994 OS/15/00 000101 Voucher: 154995 0~/15/00 000104 Voucher: 154996 OS/15/00 000106 Voucher: 154997 OS/15/00 000109 Voucher: PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE Bank Code: key 002-141-10 319-041-10 91S-041-10 S925961000 102-141-10 109-922-10 711-141-10 71S-041-10 040-699-00 9S466761 9S692041 9S692040 9S1S6380 98255960 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES I 20405718 Bank Code: key LOCK SHOP (DBA) Bank Code: key LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT Bank Code: key PETTY CASH Bank Code: key LOGREYRA, EDELINE M Bank Code: key 13770 0003059601 0001014202 0002592802 0002781501 0002961501 0003042401 008305 CA13234FW CA15733FW CA11629FW CA10092FW CA12113FW CA14632FW CA04445FW CA16039FW CA16039/40 7251023 SELECT TRAVEL INC Bank Code; key ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12170 Bank Code: key 12186 12174 08/0S/00 Os/OS/OO OS/08/00 OS/08/00 OS/08/00 08/0S/00 08/0S/00 08/0S/00 08/0S/00 PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PKM-ELECTRICITY/GAS CH PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 07/20/00 MSF-LETTERHEAD:2ND PG OS/03/00 MC-STORAGE BOXES 08/01/00 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 06/29/00 CDPL-CUSOM STAMPS 07/05/00 PKM-FILE FOLDERS 08/03/00 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 08/03/00 MSFLT-LOCKSMITH SVCS # 07/27/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/24/00 07/24/00 PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS PKM-WATER/SEWER SVCS PWS-WATER SERVICE PWS-WATER SERVICE 08/08/00 CDA-REIM PETTY CASH 07/17/00 07/19/00 07/24/00 07/14/00 07/25/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 OS/01/00 08/03/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA13234 DC-INTERPRETER:CA15733 DC-INTERPRETER:CAl1629 DC-INTERPRETER:CA10092 DC-INTERPRETER:CA12113 DC-INTERPRETER:CA14632 DC-INTERPRETER:CA04445 DC-INTERPRETER:CA16039 DC-INTE~PRETER:CA16039 07/25/00 PS-AIRFARE:A SPICUZZA 07/25/00 PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 08/03/00 MC-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 07/31/00 PKM-KEYS (continued) 32.39 55.25 225.01 15.58 6.10 l,23S.06 10.58 101.84 23.99 28.3S 164.69 214.84 29.00 22.15 15,942.69 459.06 1,422.93 1,422.93 37.66 37.66 14 .48 126.52 85.95 28.72 99.35 81.71 436.73 127.29 127.29 40.00 40.00 90.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 420.00 285.00 285.00 70.66 9.30 27.37 107.33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ c~ - 3~- Page: 3 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:54 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 154998 08/15/00 000112 Voucher: 154999 08/15/00 000125 Voucher: 155000 08/15/00 000142 Voucher: 155001 08/15/00 000173 Voucher: 155002 08/15/00 000201 Voucher: 155003 08/15/00 000202 Voucher: 155004 08/15/00 000205 Voucher: 155005 08/15/00 000217 Voucher: 155006 08/15/00 000229 Vo~cher: 155007 08/15/00 000286 Voucher: 155008 08/15/00 000294 Voucher: 155009 08/15/00 000328 Voucher: PACIFIC COAST FORD INC Bank Code: key FOW233656 07/25/00 MSFLT-SPARE KEY #48302 07/11/00 PKM-"NO DUMPING" SIGN 05/04/00 PWS-DUMPING FEES:ROW D 06/16/00 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MA CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE TRA PS-OSBORNE 07/19/00 PS-MIDDLE MGMT:OSBORNE Bank Code: key WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 14680 Bank Code: key 07/17/00 MC-COURT RULE SUPPLEME KINKO'S INC Bank Code: key 5151000518 07/27/00 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 5151000519 07/31/00 PS-CREDIT:515100051848 5151000509 06/08/00 PWD-PRINTING SERVICES 5151000520 08/09/00 PS-CREDIT:PRINTING SVC U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS Bank Code: key 253-661-98 253-839-98 253-630-15 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC MC-FAX MACHINE CHARGES MSFLT-RECHG BATTERY #4 MSFLT-BATTERY:M63283 # MSFLT-LOF/INSPECTION:M MSFLT-LOF/INSPECTION:M MSFLT-LOF:M15602 #4812 MSFLT-LOF:M5832 #48122 MSFLT-RADIATOR:M41903 MSFLT-RADIATOR/SHOCKS/ MSFLT-LOF/REPL HEADLAM MSFLT-IGNITION LOCK/LO FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 4-967-6003 07/31/00 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES Bank Code: key FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERC CM-LEADERS 07/21/00 CM-ADV LDRSHP-ROBINSON Bank Code: key 5:AGOO-102 08/01/00 CM-TOURISM PROGRAM MGT 60.71 60.71 27.40 69.66 8,529.85 734.45 8,626.91 734.45 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISIO 0054784 Bank Code: key 0036750 0045694 GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER Bank Code: Key 063142 063332 063410 063405 063412 063283 063364 063533 063535 063532 07/16/00 07/26/00 07/29/00 07/14/00 07/25/00 07/28/00 07/29/00 07/29/00 07/22/00 07/27/00 08/05/00 08/05/00 08/05/00 07/22/00 MSTEL-PAGER SERVICE 06/29/00 PKRCS-PRKNG LOT SIGNS: 06/29/00 PKRCS-VINYL BANNERS:RW 07/15/00 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 07/31/00 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE 175.93 175.93 METROCALL Bank Code: key VILMA SIGNS Bank Code: key 9757574 284.80 -64.35 6.79 -70.32 156.92 63000 63100 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) Bank Code: key 0054488 0055584 50.64 57.02 20.06 10.32 181.31 28.24 26.06 23.89 23.89 876.40 1,199.76 68.09 99.86 127.72 2,537.82 45.85 45.85 200.00 6,050.00 11.92 6,250.00 11.92 110.78 3,212.38 4,227.10 2/583.18 3,323.16 6,810.28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ t. 'Î 'I VI - 'J-:') Page: 4 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:54 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Check Vendor -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 391.00 391.00 Date 155010 08/15/00 000332 Voucher: 155011 08/15/00 000340 Voucher: 155012 08/15/00 000341 Voucher: 155013 08/15/00 000343 Voucher: 155014 08/15/00 000367 Voucher: 155015 08/15/00 000414 Voucher: 155016 08/15/00 000428 Voucher: 155017 08/15/00 000438 Voucher: 155018 08/15/00 000475 Voucher: 155019 08/15/00 000504 Voucher: Invoice Inv.Date Description 00-0035550 07/31/00 LAW-PR S320/SR99 WELLS ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC Bank Code: key WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVIC 2000070214 08/03/00 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE Bank Code: key SUNRISE SELF STORAGE Bank Code: key ELEPHANT CAR WASH Bank Code: key UNIT #A08 07/24/00 PS-STORAGE RENTAL FEE/ 200-JUL 20 07/31/00 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE IIMC-INT'L INST OF MUN CLER 1335 Bank Code: key CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC Bank Code: key 3939 3941 3944 3945 3946 3948 3949 3950 3951 3952 3953 3954 3971 3973 3987 3988 3989 06/09/00 MSC-IMCA DUES:COURTNEY 978 . 17 978.17 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/01/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 06/30/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 PKDBC-HIGHLINE SCHOOL PKDBC-TACOMA URBAN LEA PKDBC-QNIV OF PUGET SO PKDBC-ST LUKES LUTHERA PKDBC-ST GIFTED LEADER PKDBC-ORTING MIDDLE SC PKDBC-WEYERHAEUSER IT PKDBC-NEW LIFE BAPTIST PKDBC-BON MARCHE TRAIN PKDBC-ANTIOCH UNIVERSI PKDBC-WEYERHAEUSER INF PKDBC-UNITED METHODIST PKDBC-WA PUBLIC LIBRAR PKDBC-VILLAGE CONCEPTS PKDBC-WA LIBRARY ASSN PKDBC-WEYERHAEUSER MKT PKDBC-PUYALLUP MAIN ST PKA-SCHROD 07/28/00 PKA-REG FEE:EXEC FORUM WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASSOC Bank Code: key DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONE 3486 Bank Code: key 3507 3496 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS Bank Code: key 116285 135937 136040 135365 07/24/00 CC-AGENDA SETTING LUNC 08/08/00 MSA-LUNCH:BUDGET MTG 07/27/00 MSA-LUNCH:BUDGET MTG 07/19/00 PKCP-ALARM MONITORING 07/20/00 PKRLS-~ARM MONITORING 07/20/00 PKCHB-ALARM MONITORING 07/20/00 MC-ALARM MONITORING SV 07/18/00 PKCP-STIHL ENGINE OIL/ 08/05/00 PKM-STILH HOSE 08/01/00 PKM-STIHL/BRUSH BLADES 08/04/00 PKM-STENS BELT 155.00 155.00 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER Bank Code: key 070754 071602 071412 071580 582.70 582.70 65.00 65.00 228.42 518.75 328.25 188.10 2,846.88 58.10 175.44 1,624.00 2,710.00 729.50 350.88 399.48 165.05 949.76 110.77 30.88 54.40 11,468.66 225.00 225.00 37.58 24.71 24.71 87.00 70.34 59.74 103.00 75.00 308.08 84.18 26.77 26.25 9.73 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gl-~ " Page: 5 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:54 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155019 08/15/00 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER (continued) 071798 08/09/00 PKM-STIHL HOSE CLIP 4.49 151.42 155020 08/15/00 000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUES JUL 2000 08/02/00 MSF-REMIT STATE FEES 56,962.66 56,962.66 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155021 08/15/00 000515 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT 2110-003-0 08/01/00 PKRLS-FIRE DEPT PERMIT 100.00 100.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155022 08/15/00 000519 JOBS AVAILABLE INC PKM-SUBSCR 08/09/00 PKM-1 YR SUBSCRIPTION 28.00 28.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155023 08/15/00 000533 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES INC 15418 07/31/00 PKCP-S-200 MARKING CHA 308.12 308.12 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155024 08/15/00 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUT 213828 08/08/00 MSFLT-REPL BATTERY/ENG 245.65 245.65 Voucher: Bank Code: key . 155025 08/15/00 000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE JUL 2000 08/03/00 MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES 531.00 531. 00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155026 08/15/00 000568 AUBURN LAWN & EQUIPMENT 28176-02 07/20/00 MSFLT-BATTERY/MAINT SV 344.23 344.23 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155027 08/15/00 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 155028 08/15/00 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB 1004726 07/19/00 PS-REPL DASH BULBS:M61 116.82 Voucher: Bank Code: key 1004750 07/20/00 PS-TIRE REPAIR:M74872 13.29 1004751 07/20/00 PS-LOF/TIRE REPAIR/LIG 47.77 1004753 07/20/00 PS-LOF:M91024 #48612 196.62 1004755 07/20/00 PS-LOF:M83400 #48618 24.43 1004764 07/20/00 PS-LOF/SHOCK ABSORBERS 123.80 1004772 07/21/00 PS-LOF:M86699 #48617 23.34 1004775 07/21/00 PS-LOF:M67661 #48504 24.43 1004776 07/21/00 PS-LOF/TIRE REPAIR:M58 37.46 1004783 07/21/00 PS-REPL DASH BULBS:M88 108.01 1004801 07/22/00 PS-TIRE REPAIR:M1027 # 13 .29 1004816 07/22/00 PS-SERPENTINE BELT/REP 142.92 1004820 07/20/00 PS-BRAKES/PKG BRAKE RA 531.92 1004853 07/25/00 PS-TIRES:M89177 #48616 264.81 1004869 07/26/00 PS-SCREWS:LF DOOR PANE 21.60 1004905 07/27/00 PS-LO:M81339 #48605 25.25 1004914 07/27/00 PS-LOF:M88681 #48603 24.43 1004970 07/31/00 PS-LOF:M59234 #58407 24.43 1004893 07/27/00 PS-LOF:M61482 #48622 24.43 1005012 08/02/00 PS-LOF:M41438 #48505 24.43 1005015 08/02/00 PS-LOF:M85159 #48614 24.43 1005019 08/02/00 PS-LOF:M93678 #48609 24.43 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 6 Cî - 3 is 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:55 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155028 08/15/00 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB (continued) 1005021 08/02/00 PS-LOF:M78795 #48602 112.70 1004913 07/27/00 PS-BRAKES:M47954 #510 385.75 1005172 08/09/00 PS-CREDIT:INV 1004913 -112.13 1005030 08/02/00 PS-LOF:M88774 #48603 24.43 1005114 08/07/00 PS-DIAGNOSTIC:M81550 # 36.01 1005122 08/07/00 PS-LOF:M73285 #48503 24.43 1005136 08/07/00 PS-IDLER ARM/ALIGNMENT 180.01 1005140 08/08/00 PS-LOF:M68600 #48627 24.43 1005148 08/08/00 PS-LOF:M88400 #48607 24.43 1005150 08/08/00 PS-TIRE REPAIR #48634 26.58 1005153 08/08/00 PS-CHEM FLUSH SYSTEM:M 66.45 1005169 08/09/00 PS-INSTALL HEADLAMPS:M 20.48 1005170 08/09/00 PS-INSTALL HEADLAMPS:M 20.48 2,696.39 155029 08/15/00 000575 ATTORNEYS INFORMATION BUREA 1538 07/31/00 LAW-MISC SERV INV# 265 21. 33 21.33 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155030 08/15/00 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC 47971 04/21/00 SWM-PRO GRO BLEND 17.34 Voucher: Bank Code: key 49303 07/14/00 SWM-CLASS A ROCK 139.93 49397 07/18/00 SWM-CLASS A ROCK 391. 53 49436 07/19/00 SWM-CLASS A ROCK 735.19 49437 07/19/00 SWM-CLASS A ROCK 467.52 49302 07/17/00 PWS-TOPSOIL 15.63 49236 07/12/00 PWS-DUMP CONCRETE 27.51 49235 07/12/00 SWM-CLASS A ROCK 731. 59 49336 07/17/00 SWM-CLASS A ROCK 161.04 49578 07/28/00 SWM-COMPOST 35.14 2,722.42 155031 08/15/00 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY 885215 07/18/00 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 1,753.82 Voucher: Bank Code: key 885181 07/18/00 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 36.34 886506 07/20/00 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 98.66 892567 08/02/00 PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES 103.00 884828 07/17/00 SWM-1.5" FITTINGS 71.13 2,062.95 155032 08/15/00 000694 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMPANY 68635731 08/10/00 PKRLS-1ST AID SUPPLIES 159.80 159.80 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155033 08(15/00 000721 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC 0067121 07/20/00 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 233.49 Voucher: Bank Code: key 0067002 07/13/00 PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES 401.15 0067174 07/24/00 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 177.83 0067270 07/27/00 PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES 465.62 0067339 08/01/00 PWS-5/8'CRUSHED ROCK 181. 23 0067049 07/17/00 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 260.64 0067050 07/17/00 PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES 343.45 0067438 08/07/00 SWM-CRUSHED ROCK 150.52 2,213.93 155034 08/15/00 000724 HOMEGUARD SECURITY SERVICES HJ1287 08/02/00 PKM-ALARM MONITORING 23.95 23.95 Voucher: Bank Code: key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 7 G2;, .- ~. ( /1 jv 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:55 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date 155035 08/15/00 000771 Voucher: 155036 08/15/00 000783 Voucher: 155037 08/15/00 000808 Voucher: 155038 08/15/00 000854 Voucher: 155039 08/15/00 000873 Voucher: 155040 08/15/00 000876 Voucher: 155041 08/15/00 000955 Voucher: 155042 08/15/00 000989 Voucher: 155043 08/15/00 001003 Voucher: 155044 08/15/00 001004 Voucher: 155045 08/15/00 001046 Voucher: 155046 08/15/00 001052 Voucher: Invoice COSTCO/HRS USA Bank Code: key 02273500 05358100 01700400 07942300 04805300 05032600 00668400 Inv.Date Description 06/30/00 06/30/00 07/01/00 07/05/00 07/06/00 07/07/00 07/11/00 PS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PKCP-BATTERIES/RADIOS MSHR-PANCAKE BREAKFAST CDB-POLAROID FILM/INSP MSHR-WELLNESS STORE SU PS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 06/30/00 PWSWR-LITTER DISPOSAL 07/21/00 PKCHB-LIGHTING SUPPLIE 07/26/00 06/22/00 07/13/0C 10/01/99 04/05/00 08/11/00 MSC-PLAQUE/ENGRAVING S CM-DIV COMM NAMEPLATE PS-VISION STMT PLAQUE PS-AWARD PLAQUE-STAR C PS-COMM POLICING AWARD PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES TARGET/DAYTON'S CHARGE ACCO 1102310660 07/18/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES Bank Code: key MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANY Bank Code: key PKO08291S PKO08417S PKO08496S PKO08364S FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC Bank Code: key 006-118553 07/17/00 PKCP-IRRIGATION SUPPLI 149.45 208.47 68.91 127.03 395.70 351.60 76.01 1,377.17 315.81 -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL CO INC 6 844440 Bank Code: key PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Bank Code: key 8734782 07/24/00 PKDBC-PAVERS, ETC:B2 C 07/27/00 PKDBC-PAVERS, ETC:B2 C 07/27/00 PKDBC-PAVERS, ETC:B2 C 07/25/00 SWMCIP-PAVING BRICK 07/25/00 PS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES FRED MEYER INC Bank Code: key CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES Q2:AGOO-02 07/18/00 CDHS-COUNSELING SVCS Bank Code: key MAILMEDIA INC Bank Code: key 26750 07/31/00 PKRCS-POSTAGE:FALL REC 315.81 120.98 120.98 D J TROPHY Bank Code: key 201970A 201231A 201954A 15495A 201566A 202125A 06/26/00 PS-CRED~T INFORMATION 07/18/00 PKCP-GREASE/SUPPLIES 07/18/00 PKCP-AIR FRESHERNER 12.05 6.52 207.70 296.20 105.64 6.52 634.63 1052642 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION Bank Code: key 2654571 49.09 49.09 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY Bank Code: key 521441 521442 118.80 118.80 690.59 240.56 240.56 224.30 1,396.01 100.00 100.00 750.00 750.00 4,225.00 4,225.00 20.25 20.25 72.49 2.92 75.41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ en - 31 Page: 8 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:55 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155047 08/15/00 001112 Voucher: 155048 08/15/00 001114 Voucher: 155049 08/15/00 001131 Voucher: 155050 08/15/00 001166 Voucher: 155051 08/15/00 001171 Voucher: 155052 08/15/00 001189 Voucher: 155053 08/15/00 001233 Voucher: 155054 08/15/00 001234 Voucher: 155055 08/15/00 001240 Voucher: 155056 08)15/00 001241 Voucher: 155057 08/15/00 001259 Voucher: 155058 08/15/00 001267 Voucher: 15505908/15/00 001276 Voucher: 155060 08/15/00 001297 Voucher: 07/12/00 PS-KC CHIEFS ASSOC DUE KING COUNTY CHIEFS ASSOCIAT PS-DUES Bank Code: key DOMESTIC ABUSE WOMEN'S NETW Q2:AGOO-04 07/13/00 CDHS-COMMUNITY ADVOCAC Bank Code: key EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC 1689 Bank Code: key 1760 1761 1823 PETTY CASH Bank Code: key MALLORY COMPANY Bank Code: key 008270 07/13/00 MSFLT-INSTL LIGHT BAR 07/24/00 MSFLT-LIFTGATE REPAIR: 07/24/00 MSFLT-INSTL LIGHT BAR: 08/03/00 MSFLT-REPL WIRING/RELA 07/31/00 PKRLS-REIM PETTY CASH 1256890-01 07/31/00 PKM-SAFETY GLASSES PETTY CASH Bank Code: key AT & T BUSINESS SERVICE Bank Code: key 008367 08/10/00 CM-REIM PETTY CASH 10.00 10.00 11,750.00 11,750.00 0510645149 0510691538 0510657509 0510678441 0510661494 MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX ROURKE I 9025-00M Bank Code: key INRO CONSULTANTS INC Bank Code: key 11389 07/15/00 07/15/00 07/28/00 07/31/00 07/28/00 07/31/00 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSC-HEARING EXAMINER S 08/01/00 MSDP-EMME2 SOFTWARE SU 07/19/00 PKRLS-PROGRAM SHIRTS 08/02/00 MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM 07/28/00 07/14/00 08/04/00 08/08/00 08/04/00 07/28/00 P~RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES PKRLS-KOREAN FOOD SUPP PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES PKRLS-FOOD SUPPLIES PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES PKRCS-CULTURAL ARTS PR 07/15/00 PKDBC-LANDSCAPE MAINTE 08/01/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 797.62 500.41 797.55 228.72 2,324.30 WEST COAST AWARDS Bank Code: key 36261 145.47 145.47 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS F JUL 2000 Bank Code: key TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC Bank Code: key 88207 61598 88212 88290 88216 131.89 131. 89 FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY COUNC AUG25-AUG2 Bank Code: key FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRA 030492 Bank Code: key 030722 149.29 149.29 17.32 38.00 19.94 15.88 19.94 111.08 474.68 474.68 540.00 540.00 54.30 54.30 1,189.74 1,189.74 24.70 23.49 13.33 109.57 59.16 230.25 3,500.00 3,500.00 982.79 814.50 1,797.29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 9 (J-J - ::) I_) 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:55 Chech .....ist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155061 08/15/00 001381 Voucher: 155062 08/15/00 001391 Voucher: 155063 08/15/00 00141r Voucher: 155064 08/15/00 001424 Voucher: 155065 08/15/00 001431 Voucher: 155066 08/15/00 001601 Voucher: 155067 08/15/00 001604 Voucher: 155068 08/15/00 001612 Voucher: 155069 08/15/00 001618 Voucher: 155070 08/15/00 001630 Voucher: 155071 08/15/00 001716 Voucher: 155072 08/15/00 001793 Voucher: 155073 08/15/00 001805 Voucher: 73100 CITY TRANSFER INC Bank Code: key NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPAN 89553200 Bank Code: , key 89553201 POSTAL EXPRESS INC Bank Code: key THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR Bank Code: key ICON MATERIALS INC Bank Code: key TAK INC Bank Code: key BALL, GIGI Y Bank Code: key POLLARD GROUP INC Bank Code; key SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW GLASS Bank Code: key BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC Bank Code: key B J & SONS Bank Code: key MICROFLEX INC Bank Code; key VADIS NORTHWEST Bank Code: key 06/30/00 PKRCS-#2 MEDIUM SAND/R 07/18/00 PKCP-LIGHTNING SUPPLIE 07/19/00 PKCP-LIGHTNING SUPPLIE POSTAGE/JU 07/31/00 MSM&D-POSTAGE:CITY MAI BM207004 07/31/00 MSM&D-CITY COURIER SVC 344631 3530 3848 3951 3291 3781 3345 3459 3747 4311 3:AGOO-101 4955 CA09947FW 47670 47806 1047139 1047108 139029 144801 145973 PM 26/700 PM 16/700 00012411 00012574 00012586 00011509 08/01/00 PKCHB-ELEVATOR MAINT S 07/14/00 07/20/00 07/24/00 07/10/00 07/19/00 07/11/00 07/06/00 07/19/00 07/31/00 07/28/00 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT PWS-CRUSHED ROCK/GRAVE PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT PWS-2000 ASPHALT OVERL 07/24/00 PS-POLICE RECEIPT FORM 07/24/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA09947 07/27/00 MSF-BUSINESS LICENSE F 08/03/00 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS 07/31/00 PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR # 07/26/00 PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR 07/24/00 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 07/28/00 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 08/02/00 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 07/31/00 PKM-PLUMBING MAINT SVC 07/31/00 PKM-PLUMBING MAINT SVC , 04/04/00 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 08/01/00 MSA-TAXTOOLS MAINT FEE 08/01/00 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 08/03/00 PKM-LITTER CONTROL PRO 355.29 355.29 108.00 128.70 236.70 3,211.43 1,806.62 5,018.05 110.10 110.10 41.05 199.17 1,417.01 39.37 2,292.00 984.46 42.19 986.16 1,190.47 652,106.89 291.60 659,298.77 291.60 43.75 43.75 196.58 151.02 347.60 27.10 354.33 381. 43 195.37 10.86 100.00 306.23 1,656.15 814.50 2,470.65 11.77 524.54 92.74 629.05 4,225.00 4,225.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C1 - Y1 Page: 10 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:55 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155074 08/15/00 001856 Voucher: 155075 08/15/00 001893 Voucher: 155076 08/15/00 001902 Voucher: 155077 08/15/00 001988 Voucher: 155078 08/15/00 002038 Voucher: 155079 08/15/00 002087 Voucher: 155080 08/15/00 002093 Voucher: 155081 08/15/00 002204 Voucher: 155082 08/15/00 002241 Voucher: 155083 08/15/00 002366 Voucher: 155084 08/15/00 002426 Voucher: 155085 08/15/00 002477 Voucher: 155086 08/15/00 002501 Voucher: 155087 08/15/00 002528 Voucher: 155088 08/15/00 002545 Voucher: ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION 30338 Bank Code: key 06/30/00 SWM-STREET SWEEPING SV FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT SIF-JUL 20 08/02/00 MSF-REMIT IMPACT FEES Bank Code: key MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE Bank Code: key SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY Bank Code: key WEST COAST BUSINESS FORMS Bank Code: key 3160 3161 720/2830 727/7760 15634 00-8011 WHITMAN & ASSOCIATES INC Bank Code: key RALEIGH, SCHWARZ & POWELL I 81362 Bank Code: key 81467 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY Bank Code: key SALVATION ARMY Bank Code: key 24-89643 08/01/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 08/01/00 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 07/20/00 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES 07/27/00 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES 08/04/00 MSHR-JOB POSTING FORMS 08/07/00 PKCHB-CARPET CLEANING 08/01/00 MSRM-INSURANCE BROKER 08/03/00 MSRM-PUBLIC OFFICIAL B 08/02/00 PKM-WILGRO FERTILIZER Q2:AGOO-08 07/18/00 CDHS-AFTER HRS EMERGEN ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LL 36181 Bank Code: key UNITED GROCERS CASH & CARRY 7982 Bank Code: key 8393 9144 9766 HOME DEPOT Bank Code: key SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO Bank Code: key EASY GOING OUTINGS INC Bank Code: key PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC Bank Code: key 4202354 1064970 97666 97641 1369 58374 07/30/00 CDBG-INTERNATL DISTRIC 07/18/00 PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 07/21/00 PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 07/27/00 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPL 08/01/00 PKRLS-MULTI-FOLD TOWEL 07/17/00 PKCHB-REPAIR PICNIC TA 07/20/00 PKDBC-INSECT SPRAY/HOS 07/18/00 SWMCIP-TYPE 1 24" RISE 07/18/00 SWMCIP-48x4 MH BASE w/ 07/20/00 PKRLS-duIDED TOUR PROG 07/17/00 PKRLS-HVAC MAINT SVC 2,961.20 2,961.20 2,383.00 2,383.00 1,538.28 1,748.55 26.06 25.05 3,286.83 51.11 441.49 441.49 757.90 757.90 3,374.80 150.50 493.04 3,525.30 493.04 672.58 672.58 2,837.75 2,837.75 273.06 53.46 39.63 28.40 394.55 29.23 94.09 123.32 52.85 873.16 926.01 413.00 413.00 146.70 146.70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6, 40 Page: 11 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:55 I Checr.. .....ist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Check Date Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155089 08/15/00 002548 Voucher: 155090 08/15/00 002557 Voucher: 155091 08/15/00 002566 Voucher: 155092 08/15/00 002567 Voucher: 155093 08/15/00 002664 Voucher: 155094 08/15/00 002679 Voucher: 155095 08/15/00 002778 Voucher: 155096 08/15/00 002822 Voucher: 155097 08/15/00 002870 Voucher: 155098 08/15/00 002916 Voucher: 155099 08/15/00 003048 Voucher: 155100 08/15/00 003093 Voucher: 155101 08/15/00 003109 Voucher: 155102 08/15/00 003119 Voucher: 155103 08/15/00 003129 Voucher: 155104 08/15/00 003157 Voucher: 1-76201 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL Bank Code: key PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT 008308 Bank Code: key U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS Bank Code: key WEARGUARD Bank Code: key FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Bank Code: key KANG, SAI C Bank Code: key 07/03/00 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC 08/08/00 PKM-REIM PETTY CASH SEA-3644-6 07/19/00 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD 42723555-2 07/25/00 PKM-UNIFORM CLOTHING 43024743-1 07/18/00 PKM-STAFF UNIFORMS 26525 CA12383FW CA14326FW CA12905FW 07/29/00 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVC 07/18/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA12383 07/27/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CACA143 07/31/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA#CA12 SADDLE SOAR RANCH INC Ju&26-JUN2 06/30/00 PKRCS-HORSEBACK RIDING Bank Code: key JUL10-JUL1 07/13/00 PKRCS-HORSEBACK RIDING PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CENTRE 008298 08/07/00 PKDBC-REIM PETTY CASH Bank Code: key FREEWAY TRAILER SALES INC Bank Code: key CANBER CORPS Bank Code: key 112326 112424 13208 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DE 008304 Bank Code: key CASCADE COMPUTER MAINTENANC 9024102 Bank Code: key WOODSTONE CREDIT UNION Bank Code: key FEDERAL WAY VACUUM REPAIR Bank Code: key AMS LASER SUPPLY Bank Code: key LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF WA Bank Code: key 2000-05 PKDBC-JUL 302138 302288 177823 178747 08/04/00 MSFLT-JACKS:TRAILER PL 08/08/00 MSFLT-EQUIPMENT TRAILE 07/24/00 PKCHB-LANDSCAPE MAINT 08/07/00 PS-REIM PETTY CASH 07/26/00 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT 08/05/00 PS-LEASE CONTRACT 07/13/00 PKDBC-VACUUM CLEANER S 08/01/00 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 08/04/00 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 06/29/00 MSFLT-TIRE SERVICE #48 07/17/00 MSFLT-TIRES 48.87 48.87 81.75 81. 75 34.60 34.60 45.98 64.82 110.80 230.40 230.40 35.00 35.00 35.00 624.00 312.00 105.00 936.00 116.20 116.20 23.50 341. 46 316.25 364.96 316.25 166.49 166.49 45.61 45.61 1,792.00 1,792.00 97.90 97.90 188.91 322.22 511.13 18.23 205.16 223.39 -------------------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cl - 4 1 Page: 12 .. ,;>:~ 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:56 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155105 08/15/00 003170 Voucher: 155106 08/15/00 003174 Voucher: 155107 08/15/00 003204 Voucher: 155108 08/15/00 003210 Voucher: 155109 08/15/00 003269 Voucher: 155110 08/15/00 003307 Voucher: 155111 08/15/00 003310 Voucher: 155112 08/15/00 003339 Voucher: 155113 08/15/00 003340 Voucher: 155114 08/15/00 003361 Voucher: 155115 08/15/00 003365 Voucher: 155116 08/15/00 003444 Voucher: 155117 08/15/00 003466 Vo~cher: 155118 08/15/00 003472 Voucher: 155119 08/15/00 003475 Voucher: MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 26466 Bank Code: key SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT Bank Code: key TRUCKERS SUPPLY INC Bank Code: key HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC Bank Code: key AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO Bank Code: key BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS Bank Code: key U S BANK OF WASHINGTON Bank Code: key MARKSMAN INC, THE Bank Code: key 534887 967570 3510 3550 3551 07/28/00 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S 07/07/00 PS-SAFARILAND HOLSTERS 08/01/00 MSFLT-MUD FLAP #48035 06/01/00 PKC-GENL SURVEYING SVC 07/01/00 PKC-GENL SURVEYING SVC 07/01/00 PKC-GENL SURVEYING SVC 7595715-01 07/27/00 PKDBC-VACUUM CLEANER/B 0035000607 07/31/00 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 3:MA SEGAL 07/28/00 PWS-5% RETAINAGE:OVERL 802-1 DB08-0004 SMITH PHD, DAVID H Bank Code: key SEATTLE DEPOSITION REPORTER 96666 Bank Code: key HEAVENER, DONOVAN Bank Code: key WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS Bank Code: key 08/02/00 PS-FIRING RANGE USE 08/02/00 PS-DEBRIEFING FEES 07/18/00 PS-TRANSCRIPT CHARGES PS-JUL 20T 07/20/00 PS-REIMB SCHOOL FEE JUL5-JUL28 07/28/00 PS-UNIFORM CLEANING LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY IN 178783 Bank Code: key DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS INC Bank Code: key U S BANK Bank Code: key 70733 70972 70975 70980 70994 168660 07/26/00 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIE 05/15/00 05/15/00 05/15/00 05/15/00 05/31/00 05/15/00 PS-RADIO REPAIR #48805 PS-RADlp REPAIR #48806 PS-RADIO REPAIR #48803 PS-RADIO REPAIR #48801 PS-REPL WIRE/MIC CIRCU PS-INSTL BRACKET/PARTS CTSO046231 05/31/00 MSF-TRUSTEE FEES:COP92 CTSO046231 05/31/00 MSF-TRUSTEE FEES:COP91 30.00 30.00 809.25 809.25 21.61 21.61 4,517.75 3,813.23 3,549.90 385.03 11,880.88 385.03 124.40 124.40 34,321.42 34,321. 42 26.02 26.02 312.50 312.50 170.50 170.50 67.00 67.00 691.20 691. 20 39.95 39.95 374.70 474.96 474.96 474.96 112.40 474.96 2,386.94 1,265.00 1,127.50 2,392.50 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1'.'71-'- .. ) U I , C"o Page: 13 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:0a:56 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date 155120 oa/15/00 003520 Voucher: 155121 oa/15/00 003563 Voucher: 155122 oa/15/00 003645 Voucher: 155123 oa/1~/00 003664 Voucher: 155124 oa/15/00 003a02 Voucher: 155125 Oa/15/00 003a31 Voucher: 155126 Oa/15/00 003a37 Voucher: 155127 Oa/15/00 003a9a Voucher: 15512a oa/15/00 003922 Voucher: 155129 oa/15/00 003948 Voucher: 155130 08/15/00 003992 Voucher: 155131 Oa/15/00 004004 Vollcher: 155132 08/15/00 004049 Voucher: 155133 Oa/15/00 004090 Voucher: 155134 08/15/00 004093 Voucher: Invoice Inv.Date Description PHUNG, NOVA C Bank Code: key CAOO13898F 08/01/00 MC-INTERPRETER:CAOO138 CA10585FW 08/03/00 MC-INTERPRETER:CA10585 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTE 0659 Bank Code: key 0680 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE 1101-1105 Bank Code: key 1107 1106 1099 1108 400154 LILE INTERNATIONAL Bank Code: key FINAL TOUCH FINISHING SCHOO 53 Bank Code: key GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES Bank Code: key UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Bank Code: key 00-019 07/28/00 07/28/00 08/04/00 08/04/00 08/04/00 07/24/00 08/04/00 PS-LANGUAGE LINE USAGE PS-MDT MO MAINTENANCE PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT PKM-REC CLASSROOM CLEA PKM-REC CLASSROOM CLEA 07/14/00 PWS-MOVING BOXES 07/25/00 PKRCS-STARTING POINT C 07/31/00 PS-POLYGRAPH EXAMS 0000F6588V 07/22/00 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 0000F6588V 07/29/00 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES RADIO COMMUNICATION SERVICE 202921 Bank Code: key 4483199 NATIONAL BAG COMPANY INC Bank Code: key EDGEWOOD FIREPLACE SHOP INC 15802 Bank Code: key ACN COMPUTER Bank Code: key PACIFIC COAST FORD INC Bank Code: key 015072 07/31/00 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 100.00 75.00 175.00 -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 07/27/00 PS-2MM POLY TUBING ROL 07/21/00 PWS-6 PAK GAS MIX 08/03/00 MSDP-128MB SDRAM 168 P PS-JUL 20T 07/20/00 PS-LEASE CONTRACT NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC Bank Code: key 25694606 07/31/00 MSDP-FW ORG ADDRESS RE 08/04/00 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES D08-6046-0 07/19/00 MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES 216.60 570.00 7a6.60 CREATIVE MINDS Bank Code: key U S WEST INTERPRISE Bank Code: key 034714 1,902.25 874.00 1,634.00 41a.00 427.50 5,255.75 140.00 140.00 260.00 260.00 625.00 625.00 11.80 15.00 26.80 2,521.50 2,521.50 154.36 154.36 15.65 15.65 161.81 161.81 1,532.97 1,532.97 35.00 35.00 30.63 30.63 429.75 429.75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ en - 43 Page: 14 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:56 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155135 08/15/00 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC 112009 07/31/00 PKM-PARKING LOT SWEEPI 419.97 419.97 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155136 08/15/00 004205 BELTANE WEB SERVICES WAFED-01 08/09/00 MSDP-CI.FEDERAL-WAY.WA 60.00 60.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155137 08/15/00 004233 COMPUMASTER 5460632 07/27/00 PS-MICROSOFT ACCESS 399.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 5460633 07/27/00 PS-MICROSOFT ACCESS 399.00 798.00 155138 08/15/00 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 002284 07/22/00 MSC-ORDINANCE: 00-370 50.60 Voucher: Bank Code: key 002276 07/22/00 MSHR-JOB AD:ACCT TECH 110.80 002277 07/22/00 MSHR-JOB AD:FINANCIAL 110.80 002278 07/22/00 MSHR-JOB AD:OFFICE TEC 110.80 002279 07/22/00 MSHR-JOB AD:ACCT TECH 110.80 002322 08/02/00 MSHR-JOB AD:ELEC/BLDG 138.50 002323 08/02/00 MSHR-JOB AD:ASSOC PLAN 138.50 770.80 155139 08/15/00 004279 LEXIS PUBLISHING 059268 07/11/00 LAW-BOOKS WA APPELLATE 74.76 74.76 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155140 08/15/00 004311 PACIFIC RIM RESOURCES INC CRP 1 07/07/00 SWR-COMPUTER RECOVERY 4,995.52 4,995.52 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155141 08/15/00 004317 RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PHOTO 1026030500 07/21/00 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 139.27 Voucher: Bank Code: key 1026033930 07/28/00 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 101.14 1026026230 07/14/00 MSHR-CAMERA FILM 27.14 1026032660 07/26/00 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 111.73 1026034920 07/31/00 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 4.67 1026035130 07/31/00 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 44.90 428.85 155142 08/15/00 004318 EDGEWOOD NATIONAL INC 246430-A 07/27/00 MSFLT-VEHICLE TOOLBOX 351.17 351.17 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155143 08l15/00 004412 CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS SALE 116-00 06/30/00 PS-VEHICLE MAINT SVC 1,217.97 1,217.97 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155144 08/15/00 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 0.00 **VOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 155145 08/15/00 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 00002062 05/30/00 CDPL-PLN EXP REV:NEW H 130.20 Voucher: Bank Code: key 00002118 07/25/00 CDPL:ON-CALL PLANNING 210.00 00002121 07/25/00 CDPL-PLr REV¡COTTAGES/ 559.80 00002123 07/25/00 CDPL-PLN REV:FW CORP C 985.20 00002119 07/25/00 CDPL-PLN REV:BELLE MEA 900.00 00002129 07/25/00 CDPL-PLN REV:KELLER SU 570.00 00002135 07/25/00 CDPL-PLN REV:WILLIAMS 675.60 00002124 07/25/00 CDPL-PLN REV:FEDWAY SO 310.20 00002126 07/25/00 CDPL-PLN EXP REV:FRITO 1,020.00 00002132 07/25/00 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV:DEVR 889.80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 15 Gl r£t 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:56 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Check Date Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155145 08/15/00 004431 155146 08/15/00 004481 Voucher: 155147 08/1S/00 004486 Voucher: 155148 08/15/00 004669 Voucher: 155149 08/15/00 004701 Voucher: 155150 08/15/00 004710 Voucher: 155151 08/15/00 004727 Voucher: 155152 08/15/00 004788 Voucher: 155153 08/15/00 004835 Voucher: 155154 08/15/00 004840 Voucher: 155155 08/15/00 004849 Vo~cher: 155156 08/15/00 004855 Voucher: 155157 08/15/00 004883 Voucher: MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC INTERSCAPES INC Bank Code: key JONES & JONES Bank Code: key AT&T CABLE SERVICES Bank Code: key NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Bank Code: key VISIONS PHOTO LAB & STUDIO Bank Code: key PAINT YOURSELF SILLY Bank Code: key PROPERTY DAMAGE APPRAISERS Bank Code: key SECURITY SPECIALISTS INC Bank Code: key EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE Bank Code: key 00002088 00002120 00002125 00002122 00002128 00002130 00002131 00002134 16096 MSFLT-JUL 06/27/00 07/25/00 07/25/00 07/25/00 07/25/00 07/25/00 07/25/00 07/25/00 CDPL-PLN REV:COSTCO GA CDPL-PLAN EXP REV:FW C CDPL-PLN EXP REV:NEW H CDPL:ON-CALL PLANNING CDPL:ON-CALL PLANNING CDPL:ON-CALL PLANNING CDPL:ON-CALL PLANNING CDPL:ON-CALL PLANNING 08/01/00 PKCHB-PLANT MAINTENANC 07/09/00 MSFLT-FW JACKET/PYLE 8798340160 07/27/00 MSGAC-DMX MUSIC SVC 0002682579 07/25/00 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME 00-2019 203595 07/31/00 SWM-FILM DEVELOPING SV 07/10/00 PS-CERAMICS SUPPLIES 494-229350 07/12/00 MSRM-APPRAISAL SVCS 9809513 9809540 99491 99493 SAM'S JANITORIAL SERVICE &, 43173 Bank Code:' key 44029 43226 44035 WST INC Bank Code: key MACK, DAVRI L Bank Code: key 9210JUL 07/13/00 PS-MAINT:DOOR DETECTOR 07/26/00 PS-MAINT/INSTALL DOORR 08/01/00 PS-REPL MICROPHONE:SIR 08/03/00 MSFLT-AUDIO SVC #48511 07/24/00 PKM-TRASH CONTAINERS 08/02/00 PKM-BATH TISSUE/SOAP/L 07/31/00 PKCHB-BATH TISSUE/TOWE 08/03/00 MC-CAN LINERS 07/28/00 MSGIS-PLOTTER PAPER CM-JUN 24T 07/25/00 CM-FACILITATOR FEES (continued) 60.00 360.00 515.40 120.00 202.80 168.00 120.00 60.00 7,857.00 135.75 135.75 80.07 80.07 65.00 65.00 1,514.06 1,514.06 15.26 15.26 97.74 97.74 76.00 76.00 289.96 260.64 550.60 88.67 27.10 115.77 663.59 311 . 53 173.98 45.18 1,194.28 433.40 433.40 600.00 600.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 67-1-5 Page: 16 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:56 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155158 08/15/00 004892 Voucher: 155159 08/15/00 004959 Voucher: 155160 08/15/00 005004 Voucher: 155161 08/15/00 005014 Voucher: 155162 08/15/00 005019 Vouch,er: 155163 08/15/00 005023 Voucher: 155164 08/15/00 005025 Voucher: 155165 08/15/00 005098 Voucher: 155166 08/15/00 005103 Voucher: 155167 08/15/00 005109 Voucher: 155168 08/15/00 005141 Voucher: 155169 08115/00 005208 Voucher: 155170 08/15/00 005213 Voucher: 155171 08/15/00 005215 Voucher: 155172 08/15/00 005245 Voucher: SYNERTECH SYSTEMS CORPORATI 2756 Bank Code: key GLOBE TICKET & LABEL Bank Code: key 114672 08/04/00 MSDP-8 USER LICENSES 07/13/00 PKKFT-TICKETS:LITTLE R 07/07/00 PKCHB-WINDOW CLEANING 07/05/00 MSA-FW BROCHURE DESIGN JACKSON GRAPHIC DESIGN INC Bank Code: key UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST IN 11672396-0 07/19/00 PWS-PROPANE Bank Code: key 11733342-0 07/21/00 PWS-PROPANE SEATAC FORD TRUCK SALES INC 1077742 Bank Code: key PCCI Bank Code: key 8100-11 8100/3 07/31/00 MSFLT-TAIL LIGHT LENS 16,290.00 16,290.00 88.18 88.18 MORRIS-HANSEN ENTERPRISES I 8789 Bank Code: key 2126 PYRAMID TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO 228809 Bank Code: key 228895D TRCA-TELECOM REMARKETING Bank Code: key CHRISTIAN, ENOLA Bank Code: key 46845 C48463 08/01/00 08/01/00 08/05/00 08/09/00 06/07/00 07/27/00 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SVCS PKCHB-JANITORIAL SVCS MSFLT-LOF:M75712 #4801 MSFLT-LOF/FILTER:M4707 MS/TEL-REPAIR TELEPHON MSTEL-CREDIT:46845 MSF-JUL 18 08/08/00 MSF-REIM TABS:BUDGET B IKON DOCUMENT SERVICES Bank Code: key BEV105880 06/08/00 PWS-COPIES:S 320 PROJE 220.00 220.00 FIRST USA FINANCIAL SERVICE Bank Code: key SWM-KENNIS MACGILLIVR PKM-NORRIS MSDP-PETIT PKRLS-REUT CDA-LYLE 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 SWM-JULY VISA CHARGES SWM-JULY VISA CHARGES PKM-JULY VISA CHARGES MSDP-JULY VISA CHARGES PKRLS-JULY VISA CHARGE CDA-JULY VISA CHARGES 07/25/00 MC-PRINTING SERVICES 07/27/00 MC-PRINTING SERVICES 07/25/00 MC-DIVIDERS:FILE CABIN 07/12/00 MSF-SAFE COMB CHANGES 510.00 510.00 FIFE PRINTING Bank Code: key TAB NORTHWEST Bank Code: key 12512 12522 16.30 8.69 24.99 57.34 1146389 SECURITY SAFE & LOCK Bank Code: key 202003 57.34 915.00 1,796.00 28.78 36.04 2,711.00 64.82 92 .10 -27.10 65.00 53.06 53.06 62.55 62.55 194.98 64.88 488.31 39.07 368.45 610.05 1,765.74 913.54 476.96 1,390.50 219.12 219.12 97.74 97.74 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cl-L, -/ Page: 17 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:56 Check l.Jist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Check Date Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155173 08/15/00 005249 Voucher: 155174 08/15/00 005253 Voucher: 155175 08/15/00 005254 Voucher: 155176 08/15/00 005276 Voucher: 155177 08/15/00 005300 Voucher: 155178 08/15/00 005307 Voucher: 155179 08/15/00 005321 Voucher: 155180 08/15/00 005339 Voucher: CRAFTY LADIES Bank Code: key BANKCARD CENTER Bank Code: key BANKCARD CENTER Bank Code: key DMCMA Bank Code: key COMPAQ CORPORATION Bank Code: key 000561 CC-EDC MTG PKRLS-SUPP SWM-CAMERA MSC-CONF F PKKFT-RACK PKKFT-VIDE MSDP-CHARG PKA-RETREA MC-COMM AD MC-DOOR PKRLS-PARK 07/19/00 PKRLS-PAINTING:SPEC PO 07/05/00 07/07/00 07/11/00 07/17/00 07/18/00 07/21/00 07/26/00 07/26/00 07/28/00 07/31/00 08/02/00 CC-EDC BOARD MEETING PKRLS-CAMERA/MISC SUPP SWM-OLYMPUS CAMERA/CAS MSC-MUNICIPAL CLERK CO PKKFT-6 SP ROLLING RAC PKKFT-VIDEOS MSDP-NOKIA CHARGERS/CL PKA-DEPT STAFF RETREAT MC-AD:WSBA COURT COMMI MC-SINGLE DOOR PRIVATE PKRLS-EVENT PARKING PS-TRAININ 07/09/00 PS-DRUG ID TRAINING CL PS-MADD CO 07/16/00 PS-MADD CONF:R POTTS PS-CALEA C 07/30/00 PS-CALEA CONF:R POTTS PS-FORENSI 08/03/00 PS-FORENSIC COURSE PS-EXPL CO 07/31/00 PS-EXPLORER NATL CONF MC-HENNA 08/14/00 MC-MEMBER DUES:K HENNA 4101327529 07/19/00 MSDP-COMPAQ EP PENTIUM 4101271342 06/30/00 MSDP-INTEL PRO/100+ 5P 4101395655 08/03/00 MSDP-COMPAQ ARMADA E50 4101336330 07/20/00 MSDP-INTEL PRO/ADAPTER MALLOTT'S FINISHING TOUCHES 00-11505 Bank Code: key TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES Bank Code: key EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN Bank Code: key 6859517 0024178755 0024180756 0024181756 0024196761 0024200763 0024200763 0024202763 0024203764 0024203764 0024206764 0024208765 0024208765 08/02/00 PS-CLEAN LOBBY CHAIRS 08/06/00 PS-CARD CHARGE/LATE FE 06/26/00 06/28/00 06/29/00 07/14/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/20/00 07/21/00 07/21/00 07/24/00 07/26/00 07/26/00 PKM-BULLETIN CORK BOAR PKCP-GALV COUP/TEFLON PKDBC-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKM-1/2"RIGID CONDUIT PKM-DRILL SCR W/WASH PKM-GALV GARBAGE CANS PKCHB-2X4 STUDS/BOARDS PS-SCREW N GRIP KIT PS-15' TRI-TAP PKCHB-30"INT LAUAN DR/ MSDP-SURGE STRIP/BATTE PKKFT-PARTICLEBOARD/PA 35.00 35.00 30.00 109.36 347.50 605.00 208.48 62.52 79.30 41.33 57.00 417.04 15.00 260.00 89.09 2,690.07 531.00 1,084.96 1,972.53 4,655.12 25.00 25.00 13,906.06 1,466.32 4,505.40 65.17 19,942.95 155.00 155.00 5.59 5.59 12.45 9.27 112.57 13 .55 25.34 161.64 78.87 15.17 8.60 67.25 64.77 16.66 586.14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 67- .+7 Page: 18 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:57 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Check Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155181 08/15/00 005340 Voucher: 155182 08/15/00 005341 Voucher: 155183 08/15/00 005367 Voucher: 155184 08/15/00 005388 Voucher: 155185 08/15/00 005398 Voucher: 155186 08/15/00 005399 Voucher: 155187 08/15/00 005406 Voucher: 155188 08/15/00 005421 Voucher: 155189 08/15/00 005423 Voucher: 155190 08/15/00 005449 Voucher: 155191 08/15/00 005452 Voucher: 155192 08/15/00 005458 Voucher: 155193 08/15/00 005480 Voucher: 155194 08/15/00 005481 Voucher: 155195 08/15/pO 005493 Voucher: SENIOR SERVICES OF SEATTLE Bank Code: key DODD, ESCOLASTICA R Bank Code: key COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGY INC Bank Code: key PURE WATER CORPORATION Bank Code: key PKRLS-JUL 08/01/00 PKRLS-SR MEAL PROGRAM: JUN21-JUL7 08/05/00 MC-INTERPRETER:6/21-7/ 7108 139720 140539 139694 140558 140524 140505 NORTHWEST RECORDING COMPANY 7166 Bank Code: key DYNA SYSTEMS Bank Code: key MAYBERRY, MITCHEL Bank Code: key BARGER, KENNETH Bank Code: key MERRILL, THOMAS WILLIAM Bank Code: key REY, DEL Bank Code: key COOKE, JAMES PATRICK Bank Code: key 10228996 07/21/00 SWM-WATER QLTY MONITOR 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 07/31/00 PKCHB-BOTTLED WATER PKRLS-WATER/COOLER REN PKCP-WATER/COOLER RENT MC-WATER/COOLER RENTAL PKM-WATER/COOLER RENTA PS-BOTTLED WATER/COOLE 07/26/00 PS-BLANK VIDEO TAPES 07/21/00 MFLT-MISC PLUGS/WIRES JUN21-JUL2 08/03/00 PKRCS-MARTIAL ART CLAS CA11480FW JUN6-AUG7 PKRCS-AUG PKRCS-AUG ISLANDERS DIGITAL STEEL DRU PKRCS-AUG Bank Code: key 07/24/00 MC-INTERPRETER:CAl1480 08/07/00 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE 6/6-8 08/02/00 PKRCS-SUMMER CONCERT P 08/02/00 PKRCS-SUMMER CONCERT P 08/02/00 PKRCS-SUMMER CONCERT P 07/13/00 PWS-ROLLED CURB - STAN 07/31/00 PKDBC-SITE PREP:PAVERS 07/19/00 MC-SHIRTS:SECURITY GUA 401.00 401.00 240.00 240.00 AUBURN CONCRETE INC Bank Code: key TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION INC Bank Code: key NORTHWEST EMBROIDERY INC Bank Code: key 8359 20731 7446 93.97 93.97 173.10 21.39 2.18 43.82 47.02 233.15 520.66 71.82 71.82 221.86 221. 86 1,512.00 1,512.00 50.00 50.00 600.00 600.00 500.00 500.00 200.00 200.00 600.00 600.00 35.25 35.25 4,094.22 4,094.22 160.43 160.43 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C1- 1l Page: 19 0 chklst 08/15/2000 07:08:57 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Check Date Vendor ==================================================================================================================================== Amount Paid Check Total Invoice Inv.Date Description -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155196 08/15/00 005497 Voucher: 155197 08/15/00 005498 Voucher: 155198 08/15/00 005500 Voucher: 155199 08/15/00 005501 Voucher: 155200 08/15/00 005502 Vouch,er: 155201 08/15/00 005504 Voucher: 155202 08/15/00 005505 Voucher: 155203 08/15/00 005506 Voucher: 155204 08/15/00 005507 Voucher: 155205 08/15/00 005508 Voucher: 155206 08/15/00 005510 Voucher: 155207 08115/00 005512 Voucher: 155208 08/15/00 005513 Vo~cher: 155209 08/15/00 005514 Voucher: 155210 08/15/00 700341 Voucher: 155211 08/15/00 701357 Voucher: SAFAROVA-DOWNEY, ALMIRA Bank Code: key LAW OFFICE OF DAVID RUZUMNA 380 Bank Code: key SKINNER, BILL Bank Code: key JACOBSON, MICHELLE Bank Code: key CAMP FIRE BOYS & GIRLS Bank Code: key DEL VAL, AMY Bank Code: key ULU, MAKINI a Bank Code: key NWCIN-NORTHWEST CRIMINAL Bank Code: key JAMA, IBRAHIM Bank Code:' key MTS SAFETY PRODUCTS Bank Code: key CLIFTON, THOMAS E Bank Code: key SAUNDERS, EVELYN Bank Code: key PS-JUL 26T 07/26/00 PS-REIMB:EAR PHONE APR7-JUL28 08/01/00 PKRCS-MILEAGE-4/7-7/28 2286 07/28/00 PKRCS-BABYSITTING CLAS CA16553FW CA10518FW 07/14/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA16553 07/28/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CACA105 68.75 68.75 52.52 52.52 CA13135FW 06/20/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA#1313 CA109310FW 07/07/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA#1093 PS-KAMIYA 08/03/00 PS-DOMESTIC TERRORISM CA08459FW 07/24/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA08459 256.00 256.00 1040542-01 07/25/00 PS-MESH VESTS BLK JUN26-JUL3 07/31/00 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES CA08286FW 08/02/00 DC-INTERPRETER:CA08286 07/19/00 LAW-CONFLICT ATTY:CA16 PKM-APR 27 04/27/00 PKM-SCOTCH BROOM REMVL PKM-JUN 21 06/21/00 PKM-SCOTCH BROOM REMVL PKM-JUL 26 07/26/00 PKM-SCOTCH BROOM REMVL FOSS INDUSTRIES/FOSSCRAFT I F16110 Bank Code: key 05/30/00 CDCI-BEAMS:PANTHER LK TUBAFOR MILL INC Bank Code: key PARK, YUKINO Bank Code: key YATES, JANE Bank Code: key 20.00 50.00 70.00 6-001 06/09/00 SWM-CEDAR POST/PANTHER 35.00 35.00 70.00 69242 07/27/00 PKRLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 75.00 75.00 65607 07/31/00 PKRLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 50.00 50.00 183.52 183.52 2,682.40 2,682.40 40.00 40.00 150.00 150.00 62.50 75,00 62.50 200.00 1,852.42 1,852.42 867.69 867',69 32.00 32,00 35.00 35.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ G1-~+q Page: 20 0 chklst Check List Page: 21 08/15/2000 07:08:57 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155212 08/15/00 701430 SCHOOL NURSE ORGANIZATION C928R42000 07/27/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 141.00 141.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155213 08/15/00 701431 STATE OF WASHINGTON C1279R7014 06/27/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 150.00 150.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155214 08/15/00 701432 KIRWAN, SUZANNE 67336 07/31/00 PKRLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 30.25 30.25 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155215 08/15/00 701433, DIAZ, JULIO 66989 07/28/00 PKRLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 80.00 80.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155216 08/15/00 701434 NELSON, NICOLE 67863 07/27/00 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 90.00 90.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155217 08/15/00 701435 WOODS, MICHAEL 66814 07/27/00 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 8.00 8.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155218 08/15/00 701436 FLETCHERS FINE FOODS INC 58246 07/27/00 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155219 08/15/00 701437 EVANS, DONNA 66984 07/28/00 PKCLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 27.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 67018 07/28/00 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 15.00 42.00 155220 08/15/00 701438 KESTIN, KATHY 67211 08/02/00 PKRLS-REFUND CLASS FEE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155221 08/15/00 701439 ST NICHOLAS MONTESSORI SCHO 52728 08/02/00 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE 100.00 100.00 voucher: Bank Code: key 155222 08/15/00 701440 SMALL, LEDDIE 63090 08/02/00 PKRLS-REFUND DAMAGE DE 50.00 50.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155223 08115/00 701441 BORT, LOUIE ROW96-0408 08/02/00 PWS-REFUND ROW96-0408 97.50 97.50 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155224 08/15/00 701443 BASTYR UNIVERSITY Cl194R5956 08/04/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 2,756.34 2,756.34 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155225 08/15/00 701444 WEYERHAEUSER C1295R6195 08/02/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 872.45 872.45 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155226 08/15/00 701445 KING COUNTY-MHCADS C1269R6109 08/01/00 PKDBC-REFUND DAMAGE DP 136.35 136.35 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155227 08/15/00 701446 BUSS, WILLIAM D 01-35723 08/02/00 PS-REFUND CPL REPL FEE 10.00 10.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 21 61- 5lj' 0 chklst Oã/15/2000 07:08:57 Chec. -ist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 ==================================================================================================================================== Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- ------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 155228 08/15/00 701447 PARKER, SANDRA 01-33776 08/02/00 PS-REFUND LICENSE FEE 79.00 79.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155229 08/15/00 701448 CAMPBELL, KIMBERLY 98-9452 #1 08/11/00 PS-CASE 98-9452 #1 599.00 599.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155230 08/15/00 701449 DESCHENES, CATHY S CDCI-AUG 7 08/07/00 CDCI-REIMBURSE SUPPLIE 662.10 662.10 Voucher: Bank Code: key 155231 08/15/00 701550 PARKLANE ESTATES DIVISION I CDCI-AUG 9 08/09/00 CDCI-NEIGHBORHOOD IMPR 845.00 845.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key ------------------ 254 Checks in this report Total Checks: 1,031,888.93 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page: 22 Cl - fj 1 ~",. c .A' MEETING DATE: September 5, 2000 ITEM# :J.L (t) ............................. .............................. ......... .... ................ ..... ............. ................................ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: July 2000 Monthly Financial Report .......................... ... ... .......... ......... ...... ....... ... ... .............. ............ ......... .... ........ ........... .... ...... CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ...........................................................,.............................................................................. ATTACHMENTS: July 2000 Monthly Financial Report .......................................................................................................................................... SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: ......... ................... .................. ...... .......... ..... ...... .............. ..... .... ......... ....... ..... ... .................. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee during their meeting on August 22, 2000. .......................................................................................................................................... CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve July 2000 Monthly Financial Report ............ ........... .............. ... .......... .................... ...... ................................ .... .......................... APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL P AC~: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st READING ENACTMENT READ ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ............................... ................... .................. ............................................ ..... ..................... K: \FIN\MFR \A GNDABLLDOC MEMORANDUM Date: August 22, 2000 To: Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee From: Marie Mosley, Deputy Management Services Director Subject: July Monthly Financial Report Action Requested: Accept the July Monthly Financial Report and forward to the September 5thCouncil meeting for approval. Committee Chair: K:\FIN\MFR \MFRFED RACCVR.DOC F-\ CITY 8F .. l--.---. QlIL'SlioI1S?? Conlact: /\. hlr. íC.MOSICY 661-4063 Tho Kraus 661-4\ 70 5:.11Hlra Jurich 661-4096 .-..............-.... . ~ ~~ ~~ A ~r-I ~ .." ~ ~~~... ~~~'-- ~~ FlY "A. C' .t J; A ,./ f U " :'. /I:.:;Y {'Or ...'.0.....0.' ."OS ~;qOOProj~çte(L~evenues & Expenditures In This Report . ---"'-" Overview Significant Events General Government Revenues Expenditures Attachment A 2-8 9-12 13 July 2000 Monthly Financial Report The Monthly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview of [mancial activity that. has taken place in the reporting period. This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste & Removal, Paths & Trail, Surface Water Management, Strategic Reserve, Airport Strategic Reserve, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Centre. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures [mancial activity through July for the years 1995 through 2000. Family Fest This year's Federal Way Family Fest is scheduled for the weekend of August 25 - 27th at Steel Lake Park. The annual community celebration kicks off Friday night with carnival rides and special perfonnances followed by a parade Saturday morning. The festival officially runs through Saturday and Sunday and features delicious food, a variety of fun activities, beautiful arts and crafts, two stage perfonnances, sandcastle demonstrations, stories from many cultures, hands-on demonstrations, and more. Grant/Contributions Received The Public Safety Department was awarded $12,310 from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission for the full funding to acquire two Kustom Brand ProLaser III speed-measuring devices with holsters and two Kustom Bran, Talon Model radar units. The Department has received several grants from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission in prior years.' F-~ G ENl':RALGO VERNMENTALRE VEND ES July 2000 Monthly Financial Report City of Federal Way General governmental operating revenue collections through July total $24,195,689, which is $3,570,171 or 17.3% above the year-to-date budget of$20,625,518. Of this amount, $1,153,077 is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the payment of debt service. Attachment A provides a comparison of year-to-date revenues by major sources for 2000 with comparative figures for the past 5 years. REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Period Ending July 31, 2000 Property Tax 6,833,380 3,654,326 53.5% 3,654,326 0.0% Sales Tax 8,837,773 5,959,538 67.4% 5,030,323 929,216 18.5% HoteUMotel Lodging Tax 87,035 53,498 61.5% 48,854 4,643 9.5% Criminal Justice Sales Tax 1,409,626 912,012 64.7% 794,591 117,421 14.8% Gamblin9 Tax 1,209,600 805,780 .66.6% 710,015 95,765 13.5% Utility Tax 4,703,276 3,353,008 71.3% 2,757,994 595,014 21.6% Real Estate Excise Tax 1,200,000 1,227,928 102.3% 669,865 558,063 83.3% Franchise Fees 515,508 366,549 71.1% 385,084 (18,535) -4.8% Licenses & Permits 118,253 60,487 51.2% 93,643 (33,155) -35.4% Intergovernmental 3,152,273 2,824,146 89.6% 2,065,268 758,878 36.7% CD Building Permits & Fees 1,006,182 636,559 63.3% 602,737 33,822 5.6% CD Pass Thru Fees 62,382 na 62,382 na PW Permits & Fees 226,567 178,737 78.9% 129,216 49,520 38.3% PW Pass Thru Fees 28,309 na 28,309 na SWM Fees 3,142,645 1,603,172 51.0% 1,603,172 0.0% Refuse Fees 150,752 71,680 47.5% 87,939 (16,259) -18.5% Admin Fees 171,006 99,335 58.1% 99,754 (419) -0.4% Fines & Forfeits 949,700 531,909 56.0% 557,687 (25,778) -4.6% Recreation Fees 549,852 347,139 63.1 % 357,465 (10,326) -2.9% Knutzen Theatre Operations 62,230 33,948 54.6% 36,301 (2,352) -6.5% Dumas Bay Centre Operations 447,655 262,342 58.6% 239,007 23,335 9.8% Public Safety 343,148 467,454 136.2% 200,055 267,399 133.7% Interest Earnings 911,054 615,002 67.5% 437,136 177,866 40.7% Miscellaneous Revenue 146,782 40,449 27.6% 65,090 (24,640) -37.9% Subtotal Operations 36,174,297 24,195,689 66.9% 20,625,518 3,570,171 17.3% Interfund Transfers 5,716,593 1,511,918 26.4% 1,363,796 148,122 10.9% Other Financing Sources 932,229 638,023 68.4% 658,207 (20,184) -3.1 % Total Revenues 42,823,119 26,345,630 61.5% 22,647,521 3,698,109 16.3% . Shows actuals as % of year-to-date budget. For example, 50% means actual revenues were half of what was budgeted: for that period. COMPARISON OF 2000 OPERATING REVENUES - BUDGET TO $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee 11,884 798,584 8,584 135,172 109,678 418,371 323,080 128,937 5,906 757,091 101,766 13,073 23,887 12,590 18,006 11,738 14,040 73,148 68,230 175 17,175 48,476 96,172 3,932 3,199,695 148,122 (20,184) 3,327,633 2 +=-~ Citv of Federal Way JulV 2000 Monthlv Financial Report Property tax Property tax revenues collected through July totals $3,654,326. When compared to 1999, this is an increase of$115,148. Actual - xes received in the current month total $11,884. Sales Tax Sales tax received through July of $5,959,538 is $929,216 or 18.53% above the year-to-date budget of $5,030,323. Compared to 1999 year-to-date, sales tax increased $600,652 or 12.1%. Sales tax received in the month of July totals $798,584 that is $122,085 or 18.0% above the adopted budget estimate. Compared to July 1999, sales tax increased $70,886 or 9.7%. $ 623,386 $ 902,478 640,967 582,547 660,733 669,058 678,567 694,702 735,617 657,100 687,585 793,528 July ugust September October November December 638,862 $ 949,276 714,640 575,596 655,396 769,461 645,475 682,263 850,295 761,561 739,326 800,018 2000 'Budget * I 711,432 $ 678,339 I $ 1,013,425 958,461 i 717,005 678,784 I 633,460 609,871 I 783,051 723,361 I 772,812 705,005 727,701 676,502 I 855,198 734,739 896,291 811,411 817,021 736,316 , 880,787 747,958 856,762 777,027 I ,45 :$. 8,837,173 I $' , Øi~114,~~~~,73!J,000 1$ "total. ",$ " ax¡¡jÞJ~:så'E!J::$ " "Budget is projected based on past 5 yea(s history. :2{)OO BiJdget Actual $ Våliävce, %Vanånce 764,071 ' $ 85,733 12.6% 1,201,953 243,492 25.4% 759,673 ! 80,888 11.9% 778,206 168,335 27.6% 859,218 135,857 18.8% 797,833 . 92,828 13.2% 798,584 122,082 18.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% :18.5% }8.5% 5,959,538 $ 701,122,076 $ 10 Retail sales continue to remain the largest source, accounting for 64.1 % of all sales tax collections. Year-to-date retail sales tax collections are up $343,771 or 9.9% over 1999, attributable to the addition of several new retail stores that have facilitated the overall increase in retail activity. The category with the largest increase over last year consists of large department stores such as Wal-Mart and Costco. Year-to-date construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 11.3% of sales tax collections, is up $187,515 or 38.4% compared to 1999 activity. One construction company is responsible for over 40% of this increase. Theyãre one of the top 10 sales tax revenue contributors over the last 12 months. This increase is further reflected in the City's building pennit trends. Manufacturing activity through the end of July has generated $91,915 in revenues. This is down $102,800 when compared to 1999. Just over 75% of this variance is due to a major manufacturing company recently moving out of the state. However since they continue to have sales in Federal Way, we will still be receiving sales tax from them, but in much smaller monthly remittanc-es. Since their move in April of 1999 we have been receiving only a few hundred dollars each month. We expect this to continue throughout the year. Government activity through July totals $85,092, which is an increase of$14,142 or 19.9% over 1999. This is due to additional distributions to the Department of Licensing account that relate to the prior period, as well as an overall increase in the monthly activity. 3 f-4 City of Federal Way July 2000 Monthlv Financial Report 1996 $ 3,052,832 419,030 256,002 416,418 158,538 237,266 60,947 44,541 43,811 $4,689,384 . A¡t~"¥~l~~ 1997 $3,091,816 453,824 332,846 252,244 209,467 252,861 61,197 55,460 48,023 $4J:l§7,736 It., .~ji~~ Variance frOl1'f19$9 1998 1999 2000 $ Change %Chârtge $3,194,437 $3,476,247 $3,820,018 $ 343,771 9.9% 462,444 485,283 581,231 95,948 19.8% 331,314 488,017 675,532 187,515 38.4% 295,384 309,988 375,778 65,790 21.2% 198,027 217,211 217,281 69 0.0% 263,375 194,715 91,915 (102,800) -52.8% 76,689 70,949 85,092 14,142 19.9% 62,795 67,341 63,909 (3,432) -5.1% 64,242 49,134 48,786 (349) -0.7% $4,948,708 $5,358,886$5,959,541 $ 600,655 . ~!~~g1!1§J1JJ ¡\{ffiì'~.~!!r~§Z,~;~_IP;!;t2,.<!;4?~¡-g¡~~~(~"1,1f1 Sales Tax Activity by Area The City's largest retail center, South 348th retail center, which generates just over 15% of the City's sales ta~ has experienced a growth of $28,019 or 3.1% when compared to 1999. This is due to an increase in retail activity in all categories located in the retail center. Hotels & Motels sales tax collected totals $50,706 through July, which is an increase of $26,281 or 107.6% over the prior year. This is due to several new hotels in the area, whose revenues have been gradually increasing the first few months of 2000. This increase in activity can also be seen in Hotel/Motel Lodging tax activity. na! 0.3%1 18.7% na' na 1.0% 0.1%1 6.7% SeaTac Mall is showing an increase of $7,029 when compared to 1999 activity. Three major retailers located in the mall reported an increase in activity over 1999. Major Auto Sales through July have collected $273,972, which is an increase of $43,854 or 19.1% over 1999. This is due to increased sales at the end of 1999 facilitated by the passing of 1-695, which reduced the price of car tabs to $30. 4 F-~ City of Federal Way July 2000 Montllly Financial Report South 3121h to South 316th block sales tax activity has increased by $9,285 or 18.7% over 1999 activity. This is mainly due to increased activity in the retail food stores and retail eating and drinking category. ...vilion Center sales tax activity has increased by $17,529 or 23.5% over last year due to the recent addition of a major fabric/craft store to the center. Gambling Tax Gambling tax collections are up $95,765 or 13.5% over the budgetary estimate of $710,015. This is a decrease of $50,880 or 7.2% when compared to 1999. July collections are up $9,885 or 9.9% compared to the monthly budget estimate. The increase offsets June's below budget figure as payments were received in July. ., GAMBUNGTAX REVENUE .. ..,..'", 1995- 2000 ... i.......... <..... ........... ... 2000 .. 2090 . ~!Jc!9~t 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 B\J(jget Actt.iâl $ Variance ¥"Wãrlance January $34,518 $24,558 $31,616 $28,182 $90,611 $96,849 $124,119 $27,270 28.2% February 34,518 24,558 34,403 21,305 98,117 96,195 116,227 20,032 20.8% March 34,518 24,558 30,346 23,182 104,183 95,432 106,912 11,480 12.0% April 28,811 29,665 36,041 29,498 130,536 111,387 141,769 30,381 27.3% May 28,811 29,665 31,106 19,025 150,818 105,833 108,450 2,618 2.5% June 28,811 29,665 29,421 20,121 145,174 104,525 98,625 (5,901) -5.6% July 25,653 17,721 26,096 34,691 137,222 99,793 109,678 - 9,885 9.9% August 25,653 17,721 17,016 36,336 110,081 91,056 September 25,653 17,721 18,454 36,915 111,146 92,408 October 18,681 28,715 23,907 50,005 115,324 106,694 November 18,681 28,715 20,591 51,544 118,762 105,859 December 18,681 28,715 19,766 48,147 118,390 103,568 Total $~Z2¡Ø89 . '$;J.0~¡977 $318,763>. $39,8;950 $1,430,362 $1.209,600 ¡ $805.18.0 .,,$95.765 13..5% ~.eal Estate Excise Tax For the year-to-date comparison, real estate excise tax continues to exceed prior year's collections. Through July, revenues total $1,227,928, which is $558,063 above budgetary projections of $669,865. For the current month, we received $323,080 or 152.9% above the monthly estimate of $127,767. 146,325 $ 94,719 101,508 132,678 186,187 108,060 120,432 231,911 181,490 151,333 216,381 188,999 163,211 119,717 82,116 166,282 189,860 270,672 295,736 324,962 137,949 204,439 143,877 132,448 289,269 $ 65,939 80,862 203,522 169,610 162,569 278,955 194,853 326,168 279,424 209,096 177,881 93,147 $ 58,710 74,070 110,136 104,960 101,074 127,767 113,198 119,222 106,563 89,950 101,203 10.9% 76.1% 124.4% 51.4% 74.5% 80.2% 152.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $ 372,004,440 $ 446,253,716 $ 487,629,564 $ 240,000,000 $ 245,585,582 $ 111,612,680 . Repr..ent. monthly hi.toricor pattern. for the 2000 Adopted Budget. Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Hotel/motel lodging tax collected through July totals $53,498, which represents activity for November 1999 through May 2000. This is $4,643 or 9.5% above budget. 5 F-lp City of Federal Way Julv 2000 Monthlv Financúd Report Utility Tax Utility tax received through July totals $3,353,008, which is $595,014 or 21.6% above the monthly estimate. Compared to 1999, utility tax receipts have increased $126,593 or 3.9%. Cellular taxes exceed the budgetary estimates by $226,159 or 109.6%, which is consistent with prior months. This is due to an increase in the number of cellular communication companies in our area, as well as an overall increase in cellular activity. Electric ~ 733,954 1,173,151 1,242,140 1,827,059 Gas 254,226 404,658 446,364 527,067 Garbage 120,817 172,901 184,782 320,005 Cable 177,087 254,599 311,122 472,864 Phone 331,522 561,616 612,871 969,706 Storm Drainage 77,925 56,523 81,389 181,948 Cellular 135,175 230,788 341,852 393,227 Pagers 4,129 6,547 5,895 11,400 Table reflects reporting activity through July 178,407 114,606 3,206 12,512 74,671 (11,355) 226,159 (3,191) ce 16.2% 30.3°;' 1.8% 4.7% 13.8% -13.3% 109.6% -49.5° State Shared Revenue State shared revenues collected total $3,736,156 and are exceeding budgetary estimates by $876,296 or 30.6%. The maj.ority of the variance is due to the city receiving its 2000 and 2001 distribution from the state of $228,709 and $457,120 respecmely, to offset the losses resulting from the repeal of the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax under 1-695. Criminal justice sales tax, ~hich is included in state shared revenues, totals $912,013 and is exceeding budget by $117,421 or 14.8%. 306,837 $ 315,154 $ 224,981 $ 238,096 $ 253,056 $ 3,880 3,882 3,754 3,827 3,981 242.475 242,475 242,475 242,475 242,475 119,415 112,844 114,776 119,070 124,354 167,728 182,930 116,039 63,737 63,402 63,698 65,972 61,637 67,343 86,490 na 140,834 103,593 93,244 92,159 98,493 24,103 0.0% 528,942 533,959 607,717 648,178 706,008 794,591 14.8% 788,189 799,651 829,739 809,244 825,873 995,935 -1.3% 289,949 282.462 302.405 308,371 320,072 373,567 13.4% 10,908 na 6 t:--l City of Federal Waf JulV 2000 Monthlv Financial Report Fines and Forfeitures - Year-to-date fines and forfeitures are below budgetary projections by $25,778, or 4.6%. Revenues are exceeding prior year's -;tivity by $21,513 or 4.2% through July. OUl and other misdemeanors collected through July total $86,980, which is $28,450 Jr 48.5% above the estimated budget of$58,598. Criminal costs collected year-to-date total $54,764, which is $26,312 or 38.7% above budget estimates. Budget .... i .m.~,} "".;~ I .;;..:N E5 ,,~.::n~" ",,- ~.=~..::;,}~.~ . ,. ¡ . '. .'2:,::. "~:~::I<::t~1 :~::11 A1~::1 BUd9~2000A~t!t~lch;n:::=eAcioÞ=v.n~~~. " I $58,898 $50,642 $36.755 $60,696 $64,790 $69.293 $61.931 ($7,362) (0) ! 33,042 56,197 36,609 67,000 68,187 74,077 86,177 12.100 16.3% ! 38,296 47,205 46,673 84,432 87.418 80,288 85,133 4,845 6.0% 54.415 51,752 51.192 57,881 86,409 85,020 74,618 (10,402) -12.2% 49,764 54.538 52,978 73.670 61,806 81,699 76,910 (4,789) -5.9% 56,220 46,811 50,903 65,060 75.375 84,187 73.993 (10,195) -12.1% 69,336 48,681 53,016 81,666 66.411 83,123 73,148 (9,975) -12.0% 54,319 63,650 65,748 63,201 75,755 94,539 53,235 35,218 56,801 72,363 64,884 77,993 50,022 41.486 56,376 74,815 59,561 80,015 50,281 33,604 45,810 57,001 64,896 70,181 40,104 30,269 67,590 33,327 58,463 69,285 ,$601,932 $560,0531 $622,4521 $191,1121 $833,9531 $949,700 2.7"101 4.9% ....'. " ..., i/, 27,1°/.!<5.4%J< - Month January February Mar~h April May June July August September October November December Total % Change I $531,909 ',' ($2$~J7~) " 1q ROL I' ',' ~ . Included in Fines & Forfeitures are remittances from District Court for "Shared Court Costs', 'Court Record Services' and other COlrl related miscellaneous revenue, Building permits & Plan Check Fees Building permit revenues collected total $636,558, which is above budget estimates by $33,821. This does not include pass ~hrough revenues of$62,382 for expedited and environmental review. Revenues collected for expedited review are currently not included in the budget. Building permits, which includes mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade permits total $283,948 through the end of July. This is a decrease of $93,959 or 24.9% compared to the adopted budget of $377,907. Electrical permits total $61,033, which is above budget by $4,262 or 7.5%. Plan check fees collected through July total $212,446, which is $82,642 or 63.6% above the adopted budget of$129,804. January $ 48,383 $ 26,306 $ 59,934, $ 54,814 I $ 77,561 $ 62,985 $ 68,683 $. 5,698 9.0% February 34,376 44,823 81,164 33,057 95,739 70,358 64,620 (5,738) -8.2o/c March 30,950 48,297 95,791 45,879 144,848 92,306 104,586 12,280 13.3o/c April 36,508 51,060 93,260 62,566 88,404 87,462 103,333 15,871 18.1% May 65,038 50,280 52,379 60,598 161,106 94,271 86,275 (7,996) -8,5% June 69,015 65,217 57,030 105,773 165,674 103,331 107,296 3,965 3.8o/c July 60,208 64,655 50,009 143,030 115,236 92,024 101,765 9,741 10,6% August 71,299 60,072 56,711 129,554 134,783 88,954 September 58,683 37,509 61,053 82,001 96,216 86,590 October 60,354 42,402 47,776 111,246 52,306 75,845 November 43,435 45,163 32,185 88,188 87,017 72,558 December 81,867 49,613 47,978 52,975 69,150 79,497 Exp thru July" Recovery Ratio 34,2% 31,6% 40.3% 34.5% 66.4% 41.8% 43.5% YTD Recovery Ratio 39.0% 34.0% 35,7% 37.8% 36,9% 41,4% na .. Expenditures indude Community Development Administration (001-5200-071), Planning (001-5200-073) and Building (001-5200-074). na na 7 F- f(J City of Federal Way Julv 2000 Montlr/r Financial Rt!I1ort .--.------- --.- -- - -.. - -..- 0 Electrical Permits -- - -- IiIPlan Check Fees ROW Permits and Fees Overall Public Works penn its and fees collected through July total $178,737, which is $49,520 above the aoopted budget. This does not include pass through revenues of $28,309 for expedited review. Plan review fees collected total 5116,396, which is $28,070 or 31.7% above the budget estimate. $ 22,397 $ 12,719 $ 7,041 $ 16,188 $ 25.214 $ 6266! 6,797 23,627 8,583 8,437 14,452 $ 275 11,568 I 10,708 26,504 12,347 22.290 $ 2,1.57 I April 11,224 14,751 9,079 19,977 22.313 $ (240) May 18,991 21,158 9,551 26,621 45.771 $ 29!Y77 June 7,131 8,283 9,977 26,339 24.810 $ 4:205 July 9,7261 29,676 12,353 21,002 23.887 $ 5.380 I August 9,339 ! 18,645 27,438 26,631 , I September 9,006 15,252 26,180 24,786 October 22,059 14,041 15,049 22.326 November 27,799 13,524 18,019 28,331 22,638 14,832 19,049 19,968 1, 52,!~ 14,890 21,0791 na 8 F-q City of Federal Way JulV 2000 Montlllv Financial Report GENERA LG0VERN'Ntt NT ALg~gNDlTU RES; , .. ' " ., ",'""".> . ", .., ."'. ùeneral governmental expenditures through July total $20,211, 180 or 53.0% of the annual operating budget of $38,106,687. Operating expenditures are below the year-to-date budget of $21,011,564 by $800,384 or 3.8%. When compared to 1999, expenditures are up $1,464,522 or 7.8%. Period Ending July 31, 2000 City Council 197,385 149,329 140,032 City Manager 605,720 251,653 348,521 Municipal Court-Operations 913,241 401,639 532,724 Municipal Court-Startup 91,122 87,378 na 87,378 Management Services 1,854,269 900,227 48.5% 1,074,249 CiviVCriminal Legal Services 1,215,275 727,612 59.9% 722,098 Community Development 3,290,641 1,727,462 52.5% 1,969,225 Public Safety 12,665,324 7,396,087 58.4% 7,475,107 Jail Services 1,200,000 813,855 67.8% 646,260 Parks and Recreation 3,106,062 1,747,605 56.3% 1,798,424 Dumas Bay Centre Operations 501,430 276,653 55.2% 276,566 Knutzen Theatre Operations 162,230 98,405 60.7% 94,634 Public Works Operations 3,515,383 1,679,634 47.8% 1,857,077 PW Asphalt Overlay Program 1,898,410 556,617 29.3% 501,809 Solid Waste & Recycling 312,366 167,229 53.5% 176,623 Snow & Ice Removal 55,052 5,776 10.5% 5,776 HotellMotel Lodging Tax 115,000 33,030 28.7% 33,030 Surface Water Management 1,795,621 940,093 52.4% 1,021,135 Debt Service 4,612,156 2,250,896 48.8% 2,250,896 Subtotal Operations 38,106,687 20,211,180 53.0% 21,011,564 Interfund Transfers 9,010,645 3,274,722 36.3% 3,274,722 Other Financing Uses 1,760,024 1,002,000 56.9% 1,002,000 Total Expenditures 48,877,356 24,487,902 50.1% 25,288,286 800,384 * Shows actuals as % of year-to-date budget. For example, 50% means actual expenditures were half of what was budgeted for that period. 174,022 (5,514) 241,763 79,020 (167,595) 50,819 (87) (3,771) 177,443 (54,808) 9,394 81,042 800,384 COMPARISON OF 2000 OPERATING EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL $40,000,000 $35,000,000 tal 2000 BudgetectH Expenditures. ' $38,106,687 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec na 16.2% -0.8% 12.3% 1.1% -25.9% - 2.8% 0.0% -4.0% 9.6% -10.9% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 7.9% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% c,ua 16,635 57,1Eß 62,405 29,232 200,263 124,785 327,484 1,135,211- 138,973 318,895 36,741 13,495 352,9EO 118,463 23,419 153 2,OEß 187,461 2,250,692 5,396,562 5,396,562 9 P-ID City of Federal War JulV 2000 Monthlv Financial Report Municipal Court Through July, Municipal Court Startup has expended $87,378 of its carry-forward budget of$91,122, the majority of which is the remaining invoices from the property manager for tenant improvement. Municipal Court Operations expenditures total $401,639, which is below the budgetary estimate by $131,085 or 24.6%. Over half of this total consists of salaries and benefits, including temporary help and overtime. Temporary help has expended $64,376 through the July, which includes charges for security guards. Civil/Criminal Legal Activity through July totals $727,612 and is above the budget estimate by $5,513 or .8%. Salaries and benefits, which make up 59% of the budget, are 65.9% expended, for a total of$473,582. Community Development Operations Total expended through July is $1,727,462 or 52.5% of the annual appropriation of $3,290,641. Through July, CD is below their budget by $241,764 or 12.3% of the year-to-date budget of $ 1,969,226. Other services and charges total $334,121, or 47.1% of the total budget of $709,444. The variance is partially due to the timing of human services contract payments. Internal service fund charges total $299,040, or 45.7% of the total budget of $655,057. This is low due to internal service fund charges for July not being allocated until August. Parks & Recreation Operations Expenditures total $1,747,605, which is $50,819 or 2.8% below the year-to-date budget estimate ($1,798,424). This is 56.3% of its annual appropriation. Savings can be found in services and charges, which total $362,190 or 45.5% of its annual budget ($796,286). Through July, temporary help totals $194,922 or 66.4% of its annual budget ($293,708). Knutzen Family Theatre Operating expenditures through July total $98,405 or 60.7% of the adopted budget ($162,230). The current expenditUres exceed year-to-date budget ($94,634) by $3,771 or 4.0%. This year-to-date budget is a straight-line allocation of the annual budget, due to the fact that we do not have a history from which to base future fluctuations in spending. Operating revenues collected total $33,948, which is 54.5% of the annual budget ($62,230). This is below the year-to-date budget, which is also a straight-line allocation, by $2,352 or 6.5%. The Theatre has recovered 34.4% of all operating costs as of the end of July. They are budgeted to recover 38.3% with operations, and the remaining subsidized by the General Fund. We anticipate full recovery by the end of year. Public Works Operations Operating expenditures are below the July budget estimate ($1,857,077) by $177,443 or 9.6%, and has expended $1,679,634 or 47.8% of its annual appropriation ($3,515,383). Other services and charges total $249,145, which is only 34.2% of its annual budget. Intergovernmental expenditures through the current month total $238,688, which is 52.5% of the total budget ($455,036). About half of this total consists of King County invoices that relate to 1999 activity. Capital expenditures total $76,489, which is 53.4% of the allocated budget ($143,240). The majority of this is related to the remodeling of the old fire station at Steel Lake, which is the off site location for the Streets Maintenance Crew. The remodeling should be completed toward the end of summer; Surface Water Management Operations SWM operations is below projection by $81,042 or 7.9% of the July estimate of $1,021,135. Supplies are currently 29.4% expended at $11,674. Intergovernmental expenditures are only 2.8% expended at $3,017. Salaries and benefits total $457,215, which is 47.0% of its annual budget ($972,919). This is due to the vacancy of budgeted positions within the division. Public Safety Police Services has expended $7,396,087 through July, which is $79,020 or 1.1% below the budgetary estimate of $7,475,107. Salaries & benefits, which are 68% of their total budget (excluding temporary help, overtime Police security, regular overtime & termination pay), totaled $5,285,844. This is 61.2% of the annual budget ($8,642,765). O'/ertime Police security totals $74,013 through July, but is offset by revenues collected for the services provided. 10 F-I} City of Federal Way Julv 2000 Monthlv Financial Report Jail Service is above July budget estimates ($646,260) by $167,594 or 25.9%. The total expended does not include invoices for June and July. The chart shows cash basis jail cost and booking activity for December through May only. Jail Costs vs Bookings & Maintenance Through July $813,855 12,101 $750,000 15,000 13,500 12,000 10,500 9,000 7,500 6,000 4,500 3,000 1,500 Other Financing Uses/lnterfund Transfers total $4,276,722 or 39.7% of the annual budget ($10,770,669). The total is made up of interfund operating transfers and includes $1,327,101 in budgeted transfers from Utility taxes. The allocation consisted of $142,000 for Celebration Park ($91,000 one-time funding and $51,000 ongoing maintenance and operations), $117,200 for maintenance and operations on Streets bond projects, $967,901 for the Overlay project and $100,000 to subsidize the Knutzen t;'amily Theatre. Operating Expenditures By Category The chart below shows operating expenditures and financing uses through July 31, 2000 by category or object code. 100 200 300 400 500 552 561 600 700 800 900 Personnel Services Benefits Supplies Other Services and Charges Intergovernmental ServicesrTaxes Interfund Contributions Residual Equity Transfers Capital Outlays Debt Service - Principal Debt Service - Interest Interfund Svc Payments 15,303,210 3,444,708 746,342 4,737,555 3,882,583 10,012,645 418,703 2,211,711 2,788,739 1,823,417 3,507,744 Total Operating Expenditures I Uses 48,877,357 Salaries, which comprises 31.3% of the operating budget, is at 58.3%. help, overtime pay, overtime-private security and termination pay. 8,923,202 31.3% 58.3% 1,880,651 7.0% 54.6% 370,449 1.5% 49.6% 2,268,883 9.7% 47.9% 1,752,601 7.9% 45.1% 4,390,864 20.5% 43.9% 73,880 0.9% 17.6% 739,299 4.5% 33.4% 1,357,950 5.7% 48.7% 892,946 3.7,% 49.0% 1,738,773 7.2% 49.6% 24,389,498 100.0% 49.9% Included in this number are temporary help, seasonal 11 f - \J cuv of Federal Way JulV 2000 Monthlv FinancÚll Report Other services and charges have only expended 47.9% of its annual budget ($4,737,555), with savings in Community Development, Solid Waste and Recycling, Parks and Recreation and Law. Capital outlays, which includes $1.9 million for the arterial streets overlay project, is at 33.4%. Of the $739,299 in expenditures through July, 68.7% can be attributed to the Asphalt Overlay project. Internal service fund charges are currently at 49.0%, which includes the collection of 6 months of replacement reseJ'Ies and maintenance and operation charges. 12 F-I~ ~' s :' '" " leglnnlllY Fund Balance )peratlng Revenues 'roperty Taxes ¡ales Tax iotellMotel Lodging Tax ;riminal Justice Sales Tax nlergovemmental ~eal Estate Excise Tax ,ambling Taxes Jtility Taxes 'ines & Forfeitures 3uilding Permits/Fees-CD 'ass Through Fees-CD ~OW Permits/Fees-PW 'ass Through Fees-PW -icenses =ranchise Fees ~ecreation Fees "urnas Bay Centre Knutzen Family Theatre Interesl Earnings "dmin Fee-SWM & Solid Waste SWM Fees Refuse Collection Fees Police Services Other ròtll()perätl"ilR~Yën\ië. : Operating Expenditures City Council City Manager Municipal Court-Operations Municipal Court-Start up Management Services CivillCriminai Legal Services Comm. Development Services Police Services Jail!' ... 's Pari ecreation Pub!. ,(S City Overtay Program Snow & Ice Removal Solid Waste HotellMotel Lodging Tax Surface Water Management Debt Service Dumas Bay Centre Knutzen Family Theatre ròtÌl'Ðperätl"iI'e<~"d1Wrj.,,: Ope~tlng~"v~",,~òV,!rllllÌ1de~) , Öl~~tlrig,E:Xþerid1t\ltës : Other Financing Sources Other Financing Uses Ending Fund Balance Solid Waste Snow & Ice Arterial Street Utility Tax SWM Path & Trails Strategic Reserve Debt Service Dumas Bay Centre Police P3 Intelfund Loans Unreserved Tòt;ì¡I'Endloo'Fl11id,B,ÌlJ,¡nc:.:::: s 1995 ",403,6271 s I I 3,095,2961 4.554,30~ I 621,418 3,539,169 547,242 5215,640 I 1996 10,331,541 5 3,095,296 4,689,384 623,182 3,132,657 776,163 5180,391 390,645 355,826 285,983 91,246 41,241 303,566 267,493 132,535 290,329 90,356 1,559,732 83,751 502,020 16,891,796 : 113,585 260,650 - - 865,721 704,479 1,568,220 5,078,324 327,006 1,828,138 1,395,646 363,813 39,122 169,336 855,483 649,943 187,257 - 14,406,723 ; i i 2,485,073 ! - ! - i 782,466 i 359,971 284,270 78,108 , 44,103 286,689 229,603 125,468 340,892 87,724 1,577,907 85,800 389,257 16,462,86,11 136,210 240,683 (1) 746,845 560,820 2,233,702 4,732,937 261,077 1,812,174 1,610,098 871 3,067 90,058 213,050 103,239 362,100 ¡ - , 1,077,666 : 50,210 2,050,477 1,618,909 115,131 - Nole 1: These expenditures ocaJ' primarily during the winter months, 6,443,366 12,034,148 i 5 782,012 512,373 168,308 13,891,035 I I 2.571,8261 310,713 188,5051 191,274 971,893 1,702,8~ I 39,284 2,104,6451 1,936,991 157,897 1,031,439 10,000 : 5,329,922 ':$',:: "13.$64;7401$ ATTACHMENT A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES OPERATING FUNDS Tht'OUflh July 1995 - 2000 1997 10,396,188 S 3,184,965 4,757,736 717,004 3,048,145 889,909 5219,029 1,958,653 330,127 439,558 70,735 i 42,45~ I 348,252 ' 274,9941 204,24~ 287,587 I 94,9281 1,449,426 83,653! 103,504 472,953 18,977;861" 148,199\ 328,94~ I - , 813,201 693,703 1,502,794 5,570,583 389,069 1,509,958 1,543,253 1'013'3261 50,884 319,146 860,515 I 719,379 I 239,47~ ¡ 15;702,430 i ì 3,275,4311 112,418 269,416 296,991 73,358 470,902 1,566.522 6,153 2,022,389 2,986,805 83,742 1.082,207 300,000 10,000 4,615,552 13,514,621 i $ , 1998 15,128,342 $ 3,340,359 4.948,708 752,018 3,096,275 1,287,594 5176,005 2,708,506 490,405 362,687 109,909 31,317 230,632 299,102 185,912 397,389 96,827 1,602,663 85,447 84,982 932,304 21,219,0421 126,461 341,543 911,926 902,724 1,547,790 6,331,388 422,644 1,595,213 1,736,612 , 40,590 I 29,568 171,050 758,116 I 1,040,824 i 221,763 , 16,178,212 : I I 5.040,829 ¡ i 1,843,700 I' 1,378,054 , ! 294,316 103,530 477,375 2,120,030 2.276,459 12,555 2,025,496 5,283,482 13,286 786,441 300,000 10,000 3,532,267 17,235,237 , $ f - \Lf I::' I I 17,578,962 I $ I ! 3,539,178 i 5,358,886 : 9,942 ¡ 819,115 : 3,225,185 ' 1,250,726 I 5856,660 : 3,196,315 : 510,395 : 733,332 ' 58,208 ! 121,254 'I' 31,429 96,466 I 353,299 , 399,723 : 272,427 : 27,761 577,432 98,280 1,620,989 86,840 I 198,842 i 63,925 t 23,506,609 ; 1999 138,355 328,610 - -, 949,581 930,859 1,600,245 6,777,282 682,206 1,671,563 1,604,195 433,495 3,117 132,250 -. 897,590 2,267,244 : 272,284 : 57,782 ' 18,746,658: 4,759,952 : 3,525,592 I 299,842 1 00 , 000 349,431 2,830,148 1,643,113 22,353 I 2,028,204 ' 5,748,508 ¡ 47,775 748,150: ! 300,000 10,000 4,009,345 18,136,8691 $ 2000 Revised ø"""et Tbrough July 18,136,869 $ '8,'36,869\ $ 3,654,3261 5,030,322 ¡ 48,854 1 794,591 2,065,268 669,865 710,015 2,757,994 557,687 602,737 Annual 6,833,380 8.837,773 87,035 ' 1,409,626 3,152,273 1,200,000 1,209,600 4,703,276 949,700 1,006,182 226,567 118,253 515,508 549,852 447,655 62,230 911,054 171,006 3,142,645 150,752 343,148 146,782 , 36,174,297 - 197,385 605,720 913,241 91,122 I 1,854,269 1,215,275 3,290,641 12,665,324 1,200,000 3,106,062 , 3,515,383 i 1,898,410 , 55'0521 312,366 115,000 1,795,621 ¡ 4,612,156" 501,430 162,230 , 38,106,687 i I - - t (1,932,390}Ì I 6,648,8221 10,770,8691 291,4871 1 00 , 000 I 3,406,8~ I 564,698 31,520 'I 2,000,000 4,738,354 669,334 300,000 10,000 (29,651) 12,082,630 I $ 129,216 93,643 385,084 357,465 239,007 36,301 437,136 99,754 1,603,172 87.939 200,055 65,090 20,625,518 ¡ 140,032 348,521 532,724 87,378 1,074,249 722,098 1,969,226 7,475,107 646,260 1,798,424 1,857,077 50 1 ,809 5,776 176,623 33,030 1,021,135 2,250,896 276,566 94,634 21,011,564 i I i (386,046); 2,149,941 4,276,722 15,624,042 I $ I .,,' ActuIls ThrWgh juiy 18,136,869 $ 3,654,326 5,959,538 53,498 912,012 2,824,146 1,227,928 805,780 3,353,008 531 ,909 636,558 62,382 178,737 28,309 60,487 366,549 347,139 262,342 33,948 615,002 99,335 1,603,172 71,680 467,454 40,449 24,19&.fi9\ .' 149,329 251,653 401,639 87,378 900,227 727,612 1,727,462 7,396,087 813,855 1,747,605 1,679,634 556,617 5,776 167,229 33,030 940,093 2,250,896 276.653 98,405 20,211,180 i ¡ 3,984,509 ! 2,149,941 4,276,722 - 230,142 97,480 1,110,886 4,896,519 1,510,483 28,048 2,059,491 4,007,269 74,935 800,229 300,000 10,000 4,869,115 19,994,597 $ , -' ':..:,0',:,' :',o',:V.rtat:iëè..:'::':':":, , .F.vôðbl«(ûijt'v~Þ"I., ... ÐO!lärä($L: '::"ëi'Ç"'H~) - 929,216 4,643 117,421 758,878 558,063 95,765 595,014 (25,778) 33,821 62,382 49,520 28,309 (33,155) (18,535) (10,326) 23,335 (2,352) 177,666 (419) (16,259) 267,399 (24,640\ '3,570,1.70 (9,297) 96,868 131,085 174,022 (5,513) 241,764 79,020 (167,594) 50,819 177,443 (54,808) 9,394 81,042 (87) (3,771 800,384 I 4.370,555: < ' nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla 4,370,554 .. ". OðIt6l2OOO1:08 PM 0.0% - 0.0% 18.5% 9.5% 14,8% 36.7% 83.3% 13.5". 21.6% -4.6% 5,6% nla 38.3% nla -35.4% -4.8% -2.9% 9.8% -6.5% 40.7% -0.4% 0.0% -18.5% 133,7% -37.9% 17;3,% - -6.6% 27.8% 24.6% 0.0% 16.2% -0,8% 12,3% 1.1% -25.9% 2.8% 9.6% -10,90/. 0.0% 5.3% 0.00/0 7,9% 0.0% 0.0% -4.0% 3.8,% - - 0.0% 0.0% nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla 28.0% ....~~.~...~~.~~!.~.~....~~P.~..~.~.~~.~.~!~~..~~........._....................._............_-~'!!~i#..........~.......~.2.............-...............-......-......-...--......... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM .....~!!.~~~.!.:......!.~~~...~.~~ ~~~~.~.~ s i.~~...!~..~.~_"!!p'~ a ~~ ...............-...---............................-.-........... CATEGORY: X CONSENT X ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................_............................................................ ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance and July 25, 2000 Staff Report with Exhibits A through D (Previously Provided). ........ ........ ....... .......... ...................................... ................... ......... ....................... """"""" ......... .......................... ................ ..................... .......... ................... ......... ... ....... .............. .............. _.._....._.............. .................................................. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of 1995 and updated the plan in December of 1998. As part of this present update (the 1999 Amendment Process), a number of minor amendments are being proposed. These amendments are considered "housekeeping" in nature and do not represent a significant departure from the established policy direction in the plan. There are also three site specific requests for amendments to the existing comprehensive plan designations. Ifthese requests are granted, appropriate zoning changes will be made concurrently. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on May 3 and May 17,2000. After conclusion of the May 17,2000 hearing, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments and by a majority vote of the entire membership, moved that the city council adopt their recommendations, which included approval of Site Specific Request Nos. 1 and 2, but rejection of Site Specific Request No.3. During the first reading on August 1, 2000, the Council approved an amendment offered by Councilmember Burbidge, to approve Site Specific Request No.3 (Velasco) contingent on three conditions, and directed the Interim City Attorney to prepare appropriate modifications to the proposed ordinance for the Council's consideration at their next regular meeting on September 5, 2000. ................ ... .......... ............... ........ ............... ............................................ ................. ...........".............. ........ ............... """""""" .......... .......... .... .............. ............................ ............ ....-. ............ ...................... ........... .............................. ........ CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's recommendation during public meetings on June 12, July 10, and July 17, 2000. At the July 17, 2000 meeting, the LUTC made a motion to forward the comprehensive plan to the full Council for first reading on August 1, 2000. ...............................................................................","""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".............................................................................. ............................................................................................................................ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to enact the ordinance, as amended by Councilmember Burbidge's motion, adopting the Amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan. ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.. ¡;. ~ ~; ¿; ~ ~ - - - - -...- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # - DENIED ORDINANCE # - T ABLEDIDEFERREDINOACTION É RESOL~TION # '~~"DœA~AOO_'HBIT~;;:J~ ~;t ~ ~ s;-( ORDINANCE NO. ttrt FT lJ- 30~oo AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S ZONING MAP. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990, as amended, (Chapter 36.70A RCW or "OMA") requires the City of Federal Way to adopt a comprehensive plan which includes a land use element (including a land use map), a housing element, a capital facilities plan element, a utilities element and a transportation element (including transportation system map(s)); and WHEREAS, the GMA also requires the City of Federal Way to adopt development regulations implementing its Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted its Comprehensive Plan with land use map (the "Plan") on November 21, 1995, and adopted development regulations and a zoning map implementing the Plan on July 2, 1996; and subsequently amended the Comprehensive Plan and zoning map on December 23, 1998. WHEREAS, under RCW 36.70A.130, the Plan and development regulations are subj ect to continuing review and evaluation, but the Plan may be amended no more than one time per year; and WHEREAS, the City may consider Plan and development regulation amendments pursuant to Article IX, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC"); and ORD# ,PAGEl WHEREAS, in April 1999, the City of Federal Way accepted applicationsfor parcel- specific changes to the Plan's land use maps, and the City's zoning map, and considered amendments to the Plan's text and maps; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2000, the City SEP A Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non significance on the proposed site-specific map changes and Plan text and map amendments; and WHEREAS, the Plan amendments address all of the goals and requirements set forth in the Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, through its staff, Planning Commission, City Council committees, and full City Council has received, discussed and considered the testimony, written comments and material from the public, as follows: I. The City's Planning Commission considered the requests for Plan land use map changes and for zoning map changes, and considered the proposed Plan text and map amendments, at public hearings held on May 3, 2000 and May 17, 2000, following which it approved and recommended adoption of certain of the requested site-specific map changes (Nos. 1 and 2) and denial of others (No.3), and recommended adoption of the Plan text and map amendments; 2. The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the requested site-specific map changes and the Plan text and map amendments on June 12, 2000, July 10, 2000, and July 17, 2000, follo~ing which it recommended adoption of certain of the requested site-specific map changes (Nos. 1 and 2) -and denial of others (No.3), and I recommended adoption of the Plan text and map amendments; and ORD# , PAGE 2 3. The full City Council considered the matter at its meetings on August 1, 2000 and September 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt the Plan text and map amendments, and certain of all three of the requested site-specific map changes; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. A. The proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto, reflect new or updated infonnation, developed since the initial adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, on capital improvements, transportatirn system standards, and comprehensive plan policies. They therefore bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare, are in the best interest of the residents of the City, and are consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide Planning Policies, and the unamended portion ofthe Plan. B. The three proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan land use maps, set forth in Exhibit B heret02 along with conditions set forth below with respect to Site Specific Request No.3, are compatible with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods, and will not negatively affect open space, streams, lakes or wetlands, or the physical environment in general. They will allow for growth and development consistent with the Plan's overall vision and with the Plan's land use element household and job projections, and/or will allow reasonable use of property subject to constraints necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas. They therefore bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, and welfare, are in the best interest of the residents of the City, and are consistent with the requirements ofRCW 36.70A, the King County Countywide ORD# , PAGE 3 Planning Policies, and the unamended portion of the Plan. C. The three proposed amendments to the Zoning Maps set forth in ExhibitB hereto, along with conditions set forth below with respect to Site Specific RequestNo. 3, are consistentwith the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the Comprehensive Plan land use maps proposed to be amended in Section 2 below, bear a substantial relation to public health, safety and welfare, and are in the best interest of the residents of the City. Section 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Adoption. The text of the 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998, including its land use @l@ment map,copies of which are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, hereby is aw-and shall be amended as set forth in Exhibits A. A true and correct copy of Exhibit A is on file with the Office of the City Clerk and which is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. The Comprehensive Plan land use element map -of the 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as thereafter amended in 1998 and a copy of which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk, is hereby amended as depicted in Site Specific Request Nos. 1-3 set forth in Exhibit ami-B_-hereto; provided. however, that Site Specific Request No.3 is approved only on the following conditions: CONDITION NO. I: That the property owner design and construct his development proposal in the form and under the conditions set forth in the staff recommendation that accompanied the Request before the Planning Commission; CONDITION NO.2: That within 6 months ofthe effective date of this ordinance, or such other time period as provided by the City Council, the property owner's agreement to design and construct be set forth in a development agreement acceptable in form and substance to the City Attorney and the City Council, and be executed by the developer and the City Manager. The development agreement shall contain conditions governing height, setbacks, landscaping, building design (including window restrictions), building footprint, lot coverage, and/or such other conditions as determined by the Council to be ORD# , PAGE 4 necessary to ensure compatibility between the proposed proiect and its surrounding neighborhood; and CONDITION NO.3: If a development agreement is not approved within 6 months of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning changes, or within such other period provided by the City CounciL the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation changes are automatically rescinded without the need for further action by the City Council. A true and correct copy of Exhibits A and B aoo-is on file with the Office of the City Clerk and is af8 hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 3. Zoning Map Amendments Adoption. The 1996 City of Federal Way Official Zoning Map, as thereafter amended in 1998, is hereby amended as set forth in the Site Specific Request Nos. 1-3 shown on Exhibit B hereto, a copy of which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk and which documents are hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full; provided, however, that Site Specific Request No.3 is approved only on the conditions set forth in Section 2 above. Section 4. Amendment Authority. The adoption of Plan amendments in Sections 1 and 2 above is pursuant to the authority granted by Chapters 36.70Aand 35A.63 RCW,andpursuant to FWCC 22-537. Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 6. Savings Clause. The 1995 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and ORD# , PAGE 5 1996 Zoning Map as thereafter amended in 1998, shall remain in force and effect until the amendments thereto become operative upon the effective date of this ordinance. Section 7. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of , 2000. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MIKE PARK ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. K:\Comp Plan Updates\99complanord.doc ORD# , PAGE 6 July 25, 2000 To: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Members Stephen Clifton, AICP, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner David Moseley, City Manag~ ß-P'" 1999 Comprehensive Plan Update I. INTRODUCTION Á. BACKGROUND Federal Way adopted its Comprehensive Plan in November of 1995 and updated the plan in December of 1998. As part of this present update (the 1999 Amendment Process), a number of minor amendments are being proposed. These amendments are considered "housekeeping" in nature and do not represent a significant departure from the established policy direction in the plan. There are also three site-specific requests for amendments to the existing comprehensive plan designations. If these requests are granted, appropriate zoning changes will be made concurrently. Attached are the following: 1. Exhibit A - Draft Comprehensive Plan with Land use Transportation Committee (LUTe) and Planning Commission Recommendations [The planning commission's recommendations are shown in a stribol:lt (deletions) and underline (additions) fonnat and the LUTe's recommendations are shown as €I€rwblß strikß€Hlt (deletions) and double underline (additions) fonnat] Exhibit B - Maps of Site Specific Requests Exhibit C - Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan 2000 Exhibit D - Comment Letters (a) April 14, 2000 Letter from Fred Ketcherson on Site Specific Request No.3 (b) May 31, 2000 Memorandum from Community Development Services to the Planning Commission responding to a request for clarification on a proposed change to the emergency response time (c) June 19,2000 Correspondence from Sally Ramos on Site Specific Request No.3 (d) July 6,2000 Correspondence from State of Washington Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (e) July 17,2000 On-line Council Comment from Suzanne Waters Akana on Site Specific Request No.3 (f) July 17, 2000 On-line Council Comment from Stephen and Diane Waters on Site Specific Request No.3 2. 3. 4. Two copies of the following background material are being provided. One copy will be placed in the Council Conference Room for Council review and one will be placed at the front counter of the Community Development Services Department for public review: 1. May 3, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda Packet (includes April 24, 2000, Staff Report to Planning Commission) May 17,2000, Planning Commission Agenda Packet (includes Minutes of May 3,2000 Planning Commission Meeting) May 17,2000, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 12,2000 LUTC Agenda Packet (includes June 5, 2000 Planning Commission Recommendation to the LUTe) June 12, 2000 LUTC Meeting Minutes July 10, 2000 LUTC Agenda Packet (includes one comment letter pertaining to Site Specific Request No.3) July 17,2000 LUTC Agenda Packet (includes draft Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan 2000) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. B. ELEMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE The changes and updates to the comprehensive plan can be divided into the following categories: 1. Updates to Chapters Chapters of the Comprehensive Plan have been updated and these are attached as Exhibit A. For the most part, the updates are based on input from various outside agencies or city departments to reflect changes since the 1998 update (effective December 23, 1998). Please note that Chapter 3, Transportation, and Chapter 10, Private Utilities, will be updated as part of the five-year update scheduled for 2001. 2. Update to Maps Maps have been updated to reflect changes in city boundaries due to recent annexations. In addition, the Parks Planning area in Chapter 6, Capital Facilities, has been changed to coincide with the boundaries of the city limits. There are three new maps (MapsVI-I0, VI-II, and VI-14) in the Capital Facilities Chapter, which correspond to the Lakehaven Utility District 2000 Adopted Capital Improvement Projects (Tables VI-IO and VI-II). In Chapter 7, the City Center Maps are now in color and have been revised to show the chosen location of the transit station. 3. Site-Specific Comprehensive Plan Changes The city has received three requests for a change in comprehensive plan designations and zoning of property. These requests are summarized as follows and more fully discussed in the April 24, 2000 Staff Report to Planning Commission (Table of Contents Number 1 - May 3, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda packet) (found in binder) and shown on Exhibit B - Maps of Site Specific Requests. Please refer to Exhibit B, page I of 5, for a Composite Map showing all three site-specific requests. Page 2 SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #1- ZARAN SAYRE REQUEST Location: Proponent: Request: Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Recommendation: LUTC Recommendation: South of South 305th Place and east of Pacific Highway (Exhibit B, Page 2 of5). Zaran Sayre. Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 0.27 acres from Multifamily and RM 1800 (one unit per 1,800 square feet) to Community Business and BC zoning. Approve the request. Approve the request. Approve the request. SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #2 - WEYERHAEUSERIFEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUEST Location: Proponent: Request: North of S 320th Street and east ofl-5 (Exhibit B Page 3 of5). Weyerhaeuser Company and Federal Way Fire Department. Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of20.8 acres from Multifamily and RM 3600 (one unit per 3,600 square feet) to Office Park and OP zoning. The Weyerhaeuser property (west 19.67 acres) is presently governed by a Development Agreement, which limits development to 82 residential units. Planning Staff Recommendation Approve the request. Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve the request. LUTC Recommendation: Approve the request. SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #3 - VELASCO REQUEST Location: Proponent: Request: Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Recommendation: LUTC Recommendation: West of the Hoyt Road SW and SW 340th Street intersection (Exhibit B, Pages 4 & 5 of 5). Sally Ramos for Dr. Velasco. Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 0.75 acres from Single Family High Density and RS 9.6 (one unit per 9,600 square feet) to Office Park and Professional Office. Approve the request Do not approve the request. Do not approve the request. Page 3 II. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Article IX, "Process VI Review," any amendments to the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan designations map, or zoning text must be approved by the City Council based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission. III. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on May 3 and May 17,2000. Please refer to binder for minutes. After conclusion of the May 17,2000 hearing, pursuant to FWCC Sections 22- 529,22-530, and 22-488(c), the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments in light of the decisional criteria outlined in Section VI of this report, and by a majority vote of the entire membership, recommended that the city council take the following action: (i) Adopt the amendments to the comprehensive plan as shown in (Exhibit A additions are shown as underline and deletions are shown as strikeout); (ii) Approve the comprehensive plan designations for the Site Specific Requests #1 (Zaran Sayre) and #2 (Weyerhaeuser/Federal Way Fire Department) as outlined in Section LB.3 of this staff report. (iii) Deny the comprehensive plan designations for the Site Specific Request #3 (Velasco) as outlined in Section LB.3 of this staff report. IV. LAND USEffRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC discussed the planning commission's recommendation during public meetings on June 12th, July lOth and July 17,2000. At the July 17,2000 meeting, the LUTC made a motion to forward the comprehensive plan to the full Council for first reading on August I, 2000 with their changes shown as double underline (additions) and 8~n181Q siriki Qwt (deletions). V. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY May 3, 2000 - Planning Commission First Public Hearing. May 17, 2000 - Planning Commission Public Hearing Continued. The Planning Commission made a motion to forward their recommendations to the Land Use/Transportation Committee. June 12, 2000 - LUTC Meeting. July 10, 2000 - LUTC Meeting July 17,2000 - LUTC Meeting. The LUTC made a motion to forward the comprehensive plan amendments to the full council on August 1, 2000 for first reading. Page 4 VI. DECISIONAL CRITERIA 1. FWCC Section 22-529. Factors to Be Considered in a Comprehensive Plan Amendment The city may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors when considering a proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan: (1) The effect upon the physical environment. The proposed housekeeping amendments to update the chapters of the comprehensive plan and accompanying map changes will not affect the physical environment. An evaluation of potential impacts to the environment as a result of both the non-project action and the project-specific requests was conducted and a threshold determination (Determination of Non significance [DNS]), pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) was issued on March 25, 2000. . (2) The effect on open space, streams, and lakes. The proposed amendments include housekeeping changes to update the chapters of the comprehensive plan, accompanying map changes, and three site-specific requests. An evaluation of potential impacts to the environment, as a result of both the non-project action and the project-specific requests, was conducted and a threshold determination (DNS), pursuant to SErA, was issued on March 25, 2000. None of these proposed changes would have a significant adverse impact on open space, streams, and lakes. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. The proposed housekeeping amendments to update the chapters of the comprehensive plan will not impact adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. There are three site-specific requests. One ofthe site specific requests (Zaran Sayre), if approved, will not result in any change in land use since the site is already developed as a real estate and leasing office. The second request (Weyerhaeuser) is from Multi-family to Office Park and the city's design guidelines would encourage compatibility with the adjacent land uses. If approved, the Velasco request would be subject to a development agreement, which would impose certain conditions to ensure compatibility with the residential neighborhood to the west. However, the Planning Commission felt that the development agreement should have included additional conditions to ensure compatibility with the residential neighborhood, such as increased buffering, no windows or faux windows on the side of the building closest to the residences, and possibly restricting the building to one story. (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. The Capital Facilities Chapter has been updated to address the adequacy of community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation, and schools. If the project-specific requests are granted, specific impacts associated with development will be evaluated at the time that a development permit is applied for, and any potential adverse impacts will be mitigated at that time. Page 5 (5) The benefit to the neighborhood, city, and region. Updating the comprehensive plan is of benefit to Federal Way neighborhoods, the City of Federal Way, and the region. As existing information is updated, the plan provides a better basis for decision-making. There are three site-specific requests. One of the site specific requests (Zaran Sayre), if approved, will not result in any change in land use since the site is already developed as a real estate and leasing office. The second request (Weyerhaeuser) is from Multi-family to Office Park and the city's design guidelines would encourage compatibility with the adjacent land uses. The Velasco request is for a piece of residentially zoned property that has been vacant since 1988, when the plat of Wedgewood West III was recorded. This property is bordered on two sides by arterials and on the third side by residential. If approved, the site could be developed only as a physician's clinic subject to a development agreement, which would require certain conditions to ensure compatibility with the residential neighborhood to the west. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand/or such land. This update does not represent a substantial departure in land use within the existing city boundary. However, the Planning Commission questioned the need for more commercial land based on the availability of vacant land that is already suitably zoned for a physician's clinic. (7) The current and projected population density in the area. As of April 1, 1999, the official city population from the Washington State of Office of Financial Management was 76,910. The present density is six people per acre, or 3,581 people per square mile. No new population projections were done as part of the comprehensive plan update. Please also refer to response under (6), above. (8) The effect upon other aspects of the comprehensive plan. There should not be any adverse impacts on the comprehensive plan as a result of the proposed changes. 2. FWCC Section 22-530. Criteria For Amending The Comprehensive Plan The city may amend the comprehensive plan only if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare; and Updating the comprehensive plan improves the information used for decision-making purposes, which has an indirect relationship to public health, safety, and welfare. None of the three site-specific requests, if approved, should adversely affect public health, safety, or welfare. Approval of the Zaran Sayre request would result in a long-standing use attaining a conforming status, while not affecting its surroundings. The Weyerhaeuser request would provide office space in an area, which is experiencing a demand for office Page 6 development. The Velasco request would allow the utilization of a long vacant site as a physician's office; however, the Planning Commission felt that the site could also be developed for residential uses by providing adequate buffering of the site from the adjacent arterials. (2) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city. Please see response under (1), above. (3) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36. 70A and with the portion of the city's adopted plan not affected by the amendment. RCW Chapter 36.70A (Growth Management Act), requires the City of Federal Way to adopt and implement a comprehensive plan based on its population and to amend it in a timely manner, but no more than once a year, except under certain circumstances. The city is responding to this mandate by updating the comprehensive plan. 3. Compliance With FWCC Section 22-488(C) SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #1 - ZARAN SAYRE REQUEST (1) The city may approve the application only if it finds that: a. The proposed request is in the best interests of the residents of the city; This property has been used as a real estate leasing office since 1965 and the use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning from Multifamily and RM 1800 (one unit per 1,800 square feet) to Community Business and BC zoning will not affect the way the property is being used and will result in confonnance between the existing use and the requested comprehensive plan designation and zoning. In addition, designating the site as Community Business will not conflict with any policies within the comprehensive plan. Due to the small size of the property and the nature of the request, it will not affect the interests of the residents of the city. And b. The proposed request is appropriate because either: i. Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a change in designation is within the public interest; This criterion is not applicable. or Page 7 ii. The change in designation will correct a designation that was inappropriate when established. At the time that the city incorporated, the site was zoned RM 900 (Multifamily/ one unit per 900 square feet) by King County. The city adopted RM 1800 (Multifamily/one unit per 1,800 square feet) zoning for the site, which was the closest to King County's zoning. At that time the real estate leasing office was already in existence. c. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan; This criterion is not applicable since the request is for a change in comprehensive plan designation. d. It is consistent with all applicable provisions ofthe chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan; If approved, the request would not result in any changes to the physical layout of the site and therefore would not affect any provisions of this chapter (zoning code). However, it would be consistent with page 11-17 of the 1998 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, which states that, "The Community Business Designation runs along both sides of SR-99 from South 272nd to South 348th." This site falls within that area. And e. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Granting the requested change from Multifamily to Community Business is consistent with the policies in the comprehensive plan; therefore, it is also consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. (2) The City may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that: a. The criteria in subsection (1) above are met; and b. The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and c. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; and d. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities. The request under consideration is for a change in the comprehensive plan designation and zoning. It is not a project-related rezone, and therefore, the criteria under this section do not apply. Page 8 SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #2 - WEYERHAEUSERIFEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUEST (1) The city may approve the application only if it finds that: a. The proposed request is in the best interests of the residents of the city; The request is for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning of20.8 acres from Multifamily and RM 3600 (one unit per 3,600 square feet) to Office Park and OP zoning. The Weyerhaeuser property (western 19.67 acres) is presently governed by a Development Agreement, which limits development to 82 residential units. The remainder of the property (1.13 acres) is owned by the Federal way Fire Department and developed as a fire station. This site is located east ofI-5 and north of South 320th, a major arterial, and is considered a gateway to the city. Due to its location, and consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy LUP49 which states, "Continue to encourage quality office development in West and East Campus and Corporate designations," the requested change would allow an appropriate use of the site. And b. The proposed request is appropriate because either: i. Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a change in designation is within the public interest; Since the property was annexed in January 9, 1999, Capital One, a major financial institution, has been constructed just south of South 320th in East Campus. In addition, the city has been receiving many inquires for office- related development in the East Campus area, south of South 320th Street. Designation of this site for office use is a logical extension for high quality office park development. or ii. The change in designation will correct a designation that was inappropriate when established. Multi-family zoning may not be the most appropriate zone for this area due to the close proximity ofI-5, South 320th Street, and the BPA transmission lines. OP provides a more logical transference between the above and surrounding residentially zoned land. c. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan; This criterion is not applicable since the request is for a change in comprehensive plan designation. Page 9 d. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan; If the request is granted, any future development on the site must comply with all applicable provisions of this chapter (zoning code). In addition, it is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy LUP49, which states, "Continue to encourage quality office development in West and East Campus and Corporate designations." And e. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Granting the requested change from Multifamily to Office Park is consistent with the policies in the comprehensive plan; therefore, it is also consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. (2) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that: a. The criteria in subsection (1) above are met; and b. The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and c. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; and d. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities. The request under consideration is for a change in the comprehensive plan designation and zoning. It is not a project-related rezone, and therefore, the criteria under this section do not apply. SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #3 - VELASCO REQUEST (1) The city may approve the application only ifit finds that: a. The proposed request is in the best interests of the residents of the city; The request is for a change in the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 0.75 acres from Single Family High Density and RS 9.6 (one unit per 9,600 square feet) to Office Park and Professional Office. This parcel is Tract F of Wedge wood West, a subdivision recorded in 1988. The applicant, Dr. Velasco, purchased the property in 1991 and it has never been developed for residential purposes, due in part to being bordered by arterial streets on two of its three sides. The request is being processed pursuant to a proposed development agreement between the city and the applicant. If approved, this agreement would run with the land and would restrict the use of the site to a physician's clinic with certain conditions designed to promote compatibility between the use of the site as a clinic and the adjacent neighborhood to the west. The Planning Commission found that the proposed use of the site as a physician's clinic was not in the best interests of the residential neighborhood to the west. Page] 0 And b. The proposed request is appropriate because either: i. Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a change in designation is within the public interest; Conditions in the neighborhood have changed since the plat was recorded in 1988. Since then, the QFC supermarket was constructed just to the south of the King/Pierce County line. In addition, a Chevron Station was constructed on the southwestern comer of Hoyt Road and SW 340th Street, and the city has approved a retail development for the southeastern comer of this intersection. Additionally, traffic has increased on these two arterials, necessitating the installation of a traffic signal. However, the Planning Commission found that conditions in the immediate vicinity had not changed so significantly as to make this request within the public interest. or ii. The change in designation will correct a designation that was inappropriate when established. This criterion is not applicable. c. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan; This criterion is not applicable since the request is for a change in comprehensive plan designation. d. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan; If the request is granted, any future development on the site must comply with all applicable provisions of this chapter (zoning code) and a proposed development agreement. However, the Planning Commission found that the development agreement as recommended by staff would not be consistent with Policy LUP48 of the Comprehensive Plan which states, "Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses," because the conditions in the development agreement were not stringent enough to protect the neighboring residences to the west. And e. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The Planning Commission found that, as proposed, the request would not be consistent with the public welfare, as the residential areas to the west would not be adequately protected from the proposed non-residential use. Page 11 (2) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that: a. The criteria in subsection (1) above are met; and b. The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and c. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; and d. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities. The request under consideration is for a change in the comprehensive plan designation and zoning. It is not a project-related rezone, and therefore, the criteria under this section would not normally apply. However, the request is being proposed subject to a proposed development agreement and is accompanied by a plan (Exhibit B, Page 5 of 5) intended to conceptually show how the site would be developed, if the request were approved. The Planning Commission found that based on the conceptual site plan, Criterion (2)( c) was not met because the site plan of the proposed project was not designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property . VII. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-541, after consideration of the Planning Commission report and, at its discretion, holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total membership take the following action: 1. Approve the proposal by ordinance; 2. Modify and approve the proposal by ordinance; 3. Disapprove the proposal by resolution; or 4. Refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this occurs, the City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission shall report to the City Council on the proposal. 1:\99CMPAMN\I999 StafTReport to City Council.docl7I25/00 3:38 PM Page 12 '-- ,. . .' '.' From VI & 10 n. ..1 0 , ' .P:la n: . . ,'," ,. The Draft Comprehensive Plan in its entirety is on file in the Federal Way City Clerk's Office and is also available for review at the front counter of the Community Development Services Department. EXHIB IT B MAPS OF SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS ....----.---......-.-- ---_. ~ ~ 1;1 ìí) 0.6 L 0.6 1.2 Miles City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 1999 SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION CHANGES Composite Map N City Limits . . . Potential Annexation Area . . . . - Site Requests ~~ G>~ m=- ~~ 0 F D. N Map Prlnted-Jun. .000 êl I S 304TH ST (/)8 )... S: ::r: () ï:i:: Ù ~ CI) W ~ J: l- ce T- Existing Designation: Comprehensive Plan: . Multifamily Zoning: RM1800 RS7.2 1 .! I S. 304T City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 1999 SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION CHANGES BC Zaran Sayre RS51 Site Specific Request #1 S. 305TH PL. M 1800 Proposed Designation: Comprehensive Plan: Community Business Zoning: BC RM C/)8 >- NoIe: This map Is Intended for use as a graphlcøl representation only. ...... ~,.. ., ~._'---' ..,-.. --'.-- -- .._--~. -- ,- ,,- ---..--.. 50 0 50 100 150 200 Feet r"."'- ~m (j)~ mOO .~ ~1 0 F ~ N Map Prlnted-Feb 23 2000 .. ~ ~ CP-1* CP-1* Note: This r The City of I Intended for use as a graphical reprasentation only. 11 Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. 200 0 2or ')(} 600 800 Feet ~_.. ---1 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 1999 SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION CHANGES Quadrant Site Specific Request #2 ~~ (j)~ mPl þ-c¡ 0' -r~ þ) r ~ N Map Printed. , !32000 ì S.W. 340TH ST. SoW. 340TH ST. Proposed Designation: Comprehensive Plan: Office Zoning: PO ¡Nl118 . C/) 0 c::: ~ 0 :r: Note: This mep Is Intended for use es e graphlcel representation only. - -'. -'---'--""'-"--'------'--_~'M'~I#_~M"~~" 200 0 200 400 Feet Map Prlnted-Feb 23 2000 I City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan . 1999 SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION CHANGES Velasco Site Specific Request #3 :gm (j)~ mB.-... ~~~ 0 F ~ N )\~\ ,..~"'f>\~' e,' l-I\erI ~~ NORTH E9 ~' "" (q /;- # ~ " ¡r.Jlr ~,p ,- .IÒ I"' .Òpr v , (Jfl' ..,...""'- n..l. .." ...,. ...." I ......,. "v°" ¿,~ ~(r ~ ~ ~ t ~ ft\ ;g~ G>~ moo þ..~ 0 30 15 ---- - - -.. ð' I^IIDE T'r"PE III LANDSC.APING PROVIDE 150'~' '"'IN. FROM ÄDJÃCðIT DRIV6'IA'T' PER FHX Z1-I545 30 PROPERTŸ i:iÑE N ~'40~. ~i%3r ð' I^IIDE TYPE III LANDSC.APING ~ FRONT AGE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL. BE GONS'TRI..IGTED PER c.llY STANDARDS ') f1N 34Oth ti I Ht:t: I 15:5'~. PROVIDE 150'~. MIN. FROM 1N11:R5Ec.T1ON PER FHX 22-154:5 ARQt1ElmJllAL I N1tIIOR D ESI' ~. I Me. P. S. 2211 10. ST- III. U1E 1-202 (: (253) --7411 F£ŒIIAI. ....y. -- - REN M. FRANCO ARCHITECT ." -- ",,' SITE DEVELOPMENT C. 4TER -- - -- -- --- ~"",':'IT-Q-,~:; , "'c-';" , ,'" P arksy R£érea~ftJn "hniJ,Ojj~n "Spitðe G~W:t'pr'eh efti¡~~¡1f!l!tt/1!1: ' ,. JjI i niJtÞttd;Jl4:J~Jût $~~fi (f}:,; ," ", " "',' " "r" ~, Çityio(Pederal Way The Draft Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan in its entirety is on file in the Federal Way City Clerk's Office and is also available for review at the front counter of the Community Development Services Department. EXHIB IT D COMMENT LETTERS RECE~\/r=n To: Planning Commission, City of Federal Way APR 1 4 200£1 Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-0002 ,~,,~.;..,.",.,.,._,.,..; My name is Fred Kecherson and I live at 4235 SW 337th Place. I am addressing the request for the site-specific comprehensive plan amendment 99-0002. I would like to make several points on this matter. I will start by showing how the proposed amendment doesn't fit the neighborhood (the spirit of the law) and then I will address how it does not meet the requirements of city code (the letter of the law). First, I would like to address this issue from a quality oflife view point. The proposed building does not fit the neighboring lots. The current zone is RS9.6 and is populated as such. The houses are generally about 1800 square feet and on typical residential lots. The proposed building is over 10,000 square feet and is surrounded by 34 parking spaces. The building is limited to 2 stories, but a commercial story is taller than a residential story resulting in the clinic towering over the houses. Even though the houses and the building are back-to-back, it is still completely out of place. To make a contrast, there is an old house on the comer of 320th and 21 st that was to be used as a dentist office. In this case, the structure fit the area. In the case of Hoyt and 340th, it doesn't. The need for this kind of change has not been established and probably does not exist. Any community needs this kind of clinic. However, there are plenty oflocations in Federal Way that are already zoned for this and are open. As I pass by just about every strip mall in the city, I notice a great deal of storefronts for rent. Also, I asked Ms. Clark how much land zoned OP or BN (and I should have added several other appropriate zonings) in Federal Way was still undeveloped. I was told an analysis was just started to detennine this. Until this is complete, I cannot see any need to hurt a neighborhood. The stated reason for the planner recommending approval is ridiculous. The stated reason is that no one would want to build a house on the lot since it was on a major intersection and something needed to go there. While I agree with the first part, I can't understand the second at all. Our city does not have a need to ascertain that every piece of land in it is developed. As I said, there is no need for it. We aren't Pioneer Square, for Pete's sake. Empty lots are not a sin. In fact, in this case it's a blessing. I'm not sure when the current owner bought this land, but from what I can tell he did so with the current zoning. Ifhe owned it when the development was built (about 11 to 12 years ago), he knew the zoning and made a profit on it. Ifhe bought it since then, he knew about the houses and the zoning. Either way, I don't feel sorry for him ifhe loses money rather than us losing quality oflife. Now, the proposed amendment does not meet the requirements of several of the sections of city code that cover comprehensive plan amendments. Section 22-529 of the city code lists factors to be used in a comprehensive plan amendment. Factor (3) is the compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. A 10,000 square foot building does not fit into a residential neighborhood at all. Especially when it is next to 1800 square foot houses. The size of the structure and the parking EXH~5S~T » PAGE-LOF ~ lot will be completely out of place in the area. This factor is extremely important in this type of change and should rule it out right away. But since it didn't, I will continue. Section 22-530 of the city code lists the criteria for amending the comprehensive plan. This section reads: The city may amend the comprehensive plan only if it finds that: (I)The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare; and (2)The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city. (I left out the third requirement since I am not at issue with the RCW.) First, I fail to see how the proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare. There is no relationship to these points at all. Ms. Clark stated that these come into play since a single family residence on this lot could be a hazard to the people living there. I don't think that is what this statement is about especially since the word "substantial" is included. Second, I do not see how this is in the best interests of the residents of the city. We have plenty of professional offices and plenty of open spaces in appropriately zoned areas. Section 22-488 (this is called out in section 22-529 for site specific amendments) has even more requirements that are not met. This section requires in part: The proposed rezone is appropriate because either: i.Conditions in the immediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a rezone is within the public interest; or ii.The rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate when established Since there has been no significant change in the immediate vicinity, the planners must feel that the current zone is inappropriate. I find this hard to believe since the rest of the area is developed as houses. Another requirement in this section is that the site plan of the proposed project is designed to nùnimize all adverse impacts on the developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. As I stated earlier, this kind of building is devastating to the neighborhood. The 10 foot buffer and 6 foot fence is a sham for nùnimizing the impacts. In closing, I would like to restate that neither the city nor the applicant has shown the appropriateness of this proposed amendment. It is not needed. It does not fit. It is not in the interest of the residents. It is not within the spirit of the code. It is not within the letter of the code. Thank you, Fred Kecherson 4235 SW 337th Place Federal Way, W A 98023 253-838-4117 RECE~VED APR 1 4. 2000 CITY OF FEOZ::f1AL VVA Y BUILDING DEPT. EXH I B ~1iJ PAGE 2 OF ..aL CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM May 31, 2000 To: Robert Vaughn, Chair of the City of Federal Way Planning Commission FROM: Kathy McClung, Deputy Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Response from Jim Hamilton, Administrator of the Fire Department At the May 17,2000, public hearing on the 1999 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the Planning Commission requested additional information as to why the Federal Wåy Fire Department was proposing the following change: An emergency response time of less than ~ seven minutes, 80 percent of the time (response time is measured from the time that the call is answered until the first apparatus is on the scene). Please find attached, a letter dated May 22,2000 from Jim Hamilton, Administrator of the Federal Way Fire Department, in which he responds to this question. Please call Margaret Clark at (253) 661-3735 if you have questions regarding this memorandum or Mr. Hamilton's response. 1:\99CMPAMN\Memo on Fire Response to Planning Commission/5131/00 3:15 PM EXHuanli » PAGE~OF ..a..L May 22, 2000 - - Margaret Clark City of Federal Way Dear Margaret, First let me apologize for not attending the recent meeting regarding the update to the Comprehensive Plan. I had an earlier commitment that I was hopeful would end in time to permit my attendance, but obviously that did not occur. Per our conversation, you were requesting clarification on our response time standards. In the past, we utilized an Average Response Time Standard. Unfortunately, averaging data can be somewhat misleading in that a very quick response combined with a very long response will meet an Average Standard. The long response time can go unnoticed. We now utilize a Fractile Response Time Standard that identifies percentages of calls within a standard. This allows us to identify our response times by various time elements and provides a much more accurate representation. We have updated our standard for the latest revision to the Comprehensive Plan based upon actual response time data. We annually analyze our response time by zones within the District, providing information on response times by geographic area. The components of response times are as follows: Dispatch Processing Time: This is the time from receipt of call in dispatch to tone-out. Note: We have one of the lowest dispatch processing times in the region. Reaction Time: This is the time from Tone-out to vehicles actually responding. Drive Time: This is the time from vehicle response to on-scene. EXHISn"¡r ~ PAGE~OF .ÃL Many fire agencies do not include dispatch processing time in their data. We include dispatch response times in our data since it is an accurate representation of response time from the caller's perspective. Our data shows the following: Percentage under 6 minutes: Percentage under 7 minutes: Percentage under 8 minutes: 60% 78% 89%- The Dispatch Processing and Reaction times have been relatively stable, although our past data is in averages. Predictably, the drive time is the variable that provides the greatest challenge due to increased traffic congestion, and Federal Way is certainly no exception. Even though our vehicles are equipped with Opticom emitters that sequence traffic signals, getting through heavy traffic is still a difficult, and sometimes lengthy, process. The upgrades to major streets and intersections that are scheduled over the next few years should provide some relief. The other factor is related to positioning of apparatus due to simultaneous calls and training drills. If a call comes in for a zone whose apparatus is not in that zone, the response time will be extended. Weare addressing this issue through three initiatives. The first is to identify which types of training processes could be provided via our infonnation system network versus bringing multiple companies together in a single location. This will pennit the fire companies to remain in their response zones during classroom training exercises, reducing their response times. We are currently upgrading our network bandwidth as part of the ATT fiber project. For our sites outside the City, we are evaluating fiber and wireless alternatives. We plan to implement training courses via our network in 200 I. The second initiative is staffing all engine companies with a minimum of three personnel. Aside from a host of positive impacts on fire and EMS operations and safety, three-person staffing will reduce the number of engine companies required at a scene. This will pennit more companies to stay in their response zone, reducing response times for simultaneous calls. We began this process in 1993, and now have four of our six engine companies staffed with three personnel. We will utilize savings from our move to Valleycom in 2002 to fund the third person at the final two companies. The third initiative is staffing of an additional EMS unit. This unit will help us to reduce the amount of simultaneous calls that result in bringing in apparatus from another zone. It will also provide us the opportunity to keep a staffed unit within an area of the district during those training drills that still require joint participation of multiple fire companies at a single location. The second EMS unit is dependent upon available funding, but our projections are for implementation within the next EXH ~ fB1 ri:.J> PAGE-s"OF ~ 2 - 3 years, at which time our staffing levels will have increased from fourteen (1993) to twenty-two. I hope this clarifies why we modified our response time standards to reflect actual data. If there is any additional infonnation that I can provide, pleasè-do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Jim Hamilton, Administrator E V LJ1 n r'3 r "'f'P b .ó~.rÎ'1~L~)i! I.. PAGE-'-OF ...a.L ~J; J.u- ~3. ~ ~ ~'.A ou.ú. June 19, 2000 Mr. Phil Watkins Chairman LUTC City of Federal Way Federal Way, Wa 98023 Dear Mr. Watkins; I am writing this letter in response to the recommendations of the Planning Commission to deny our application to build a physician's clinic in the corner of Hoyt Road and 340th .intersection (application # 3). I want to take this opportunity to address the concerns expressed by the residents during the hearing. I would also like the chance to present justifications to the LUTC before the final decision is made. 1) First of all, I am sony that the hearing last April 19, 2000 was postponed and rescheduled to May 3, 2000 due to lack of quorum. I was present at the scheduled meeting ready to present our request and answer questions, so the residents would understand our proposal. On May 3rd I was not able to present our case again during the hearing because I was out of the country. Rescheduling my flight was difficult and was not an option. . I am aware that there is an LUTC meeting that is scheduled on July 10, 2000. Unfortunately, I will be out of state for a business meeting. 2) The proposed project has several purposes, which would benefit the city, the neighborhood and the applicants as well. a) the area is not suited for residential as researched by the planning staff of the . city of Federal Way (see attached recommendations). Safety issues were cited by the planning staff for this area. b) the architectural design will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood as shown in the plan. Currently, tall grasses and bushes surround the parcel. As far as privacy is concerned, the planning staff's recommendation to address this issue was followed when the architect drew the plan. Proposed conditions for a development agreement provided to us by the planning staff were also met. See attached exhibit. c) the proposed clinic will have a positive benefit to the community, as this business will not only cater to the insured population but will also have a Program to help the needs of the poor and the uninsured; will serve the needs of the neighboring residents if they desire to use the services. The convenience of the location is a plus to the EXHIB~cr:_~ PAGE-LOFH- community; there is also a need to provide services to the Filipino-American community which is increasing in this city. The cultural and educational aspect of this population will be addressed. The business will help create jobs. 3) Lastly, I am willing to rework the proposed plan, taking into consideration the privacy issues. As a. homeowner myself, I am sensitive to this concern. Our architect and myself have worked very closely with the planning staff of the city of Federal Way. Countless hours were spent on this process and expenses were incurred because of our desire to see this project succeed. I am willing to work with them again if given the chance in the future. Thank for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, . 'f~ f. Æ fs~llyð'. Ra~ 1765 57th St. NE Tacoma, Wa 98422 Phone # (253) 841-5840 (day) Phone # (253) 927-4013 (eve) Cc: Mike Parks, Mayor Linda Kochmar, Deputy Mayor Jean Burbidge Michael Hellickson Dean McColgan Mary Gates David Moseley, City Manager EX H ~ B ~ 1í~.---IL- PAGEJOF J.L EV-I"'., . n ," r:,...- "2~:. r'., ': , .-8 ltø OF~ SITE SPECIFIC REQUEST #3 - VELASCO REQUEST PAGE Parcel: Location: Size: Proponent: Owner: Request: 921152-0590. West ofthe Hoyt Road SW and SW 340th Street intersection (Exhibit C, Page 4 of 5). 32,547 square feet (0.75 acres). Sally Ramos. Dr. Velasco. Request to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning from Single Family High Density and RS 9.6 (one unit per 9,600 square feet) to Office Park and Professional Office. Existing Comprehensive Plan: Existing Zoning: Proposed Comprehensive Plan: . Proposed Zoning: Single Family High Density. RS 9.6 (one unit per 9,600 square feet). Office Park. Professional Office. Availability of Utilities & Streets: Sidewalks: Provided by Lakehaven Utility District. Provided by the City of Tacoma. Existing drainage is via sheet flow off the site, along the side of the roadway, discharging onto adjacent paved streets. Access is from SW 340th Street and Hoyt Road SW. Additional frontage improvements will be necessary along the property frontage on SW 340th Street and Hoyt Road SW. Graveled to edge of paved road surface. Sanitary Sewer: Public Water: Storm Drainage: Access: Improved Streets: Availability of Public Services: Police: Provided by City of Federal Way. Fire/Emergency Medical: Provided by Federal Way Fire Department. Schools: Not applicable for a business use. Analysis: Background The original request was to change the comprehensive plan designation and zoning of 0.75 acres from Single Family High Density and RS 9.6 (one unit per 9,600 square feet) to Neighborhood Park and BN zoning to allow a physician's office. During the June 7, 1999 meeting, when all requests for comprehensive plan amendments were presented to the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTC), staff recommended to the LUTC that the request be further analyzed based on a development agreement. to be processed concurrently with the comprehensive plan. The LUTC detennined that an Office Park Page 6 of9 EXH~~r~-- »...-.- P AGE -'-U r-" .z.L E\).t;'n,.nrr-. ..- l' >. ¡ . land use designation and OP (Office Park) zoning with a developmenF!A~t";~re.v . appropriate based on polices contained within the comprehensive plan. ß ~ The City Council concurred with the LUTC's recommendation at the July 6, 1999, public hearing, at which time the City Council determined which projects should be considered further. During staff analysis, it appeared that it may be more appropriate to recommend a PO (Professional Office) zoning designation because the PO zone is more restrictive in terms of range ofallowabl~Jand uses, yet would still allow a physician's office. Staff review was based on a conceptual plan submitted by the applicant for the site (Exhibit C, Page 5 of5). The intent of the conceptual plan is not for site development purposes but to determine whether a physician's clinic can be developed on this site and meet all bulk and dimensional requirements (i.e., required yards and height restrictions) once all required road dedication and on-site detention provisions have been accounted for. Review is also intended to determine whether all required parking; circulation features such as aisle width; adequate area, and location for garbage and recycling; and interior and perimeter landscaping can be provided in support of the building being proposed. If the requested change is granted by the City Council and the owner desires to develop the site, all then existing codes and regulations shall be complied with. At that time, more specific standards such as design guidelines and detailed landscaping, and requirements such as the KCSDWM shall be addressed, as well as compliance with SEP A. Because this is a conceptual plan, future compliance with City requirements may result in reduction of building size. If the request for a change in comprehensive plan designation is granted, any future permits must be in substantial compliance with the conceptual plan. The Director of Community Development Services may administratively approve non-substantive changes. Neighborhood Characteristics The site lies on the northwest corner of Hoyt Road SW and SW 340th Street intersection on a parcel currently zoned RS 9.6 (Single Family/one unit per 9,600 square feet). Based on language on the face of the underlying plat, Wedgewood West III, access to the existing undeveloped parcel is via a tract (Tract E) that connects it to SW 33Sth Street, the current cut-de-sac to the northwest of the site. Also, the language on the face of the plat states that if the lot is developed for non-residential purposes, then permission to access onto Hoyt Road must be obtained from the Public Works Department and n"o access would be permitted via Tract E. The recorded plat of Wedge wood West III also shows a 20-foot water easement on the northwestern portion of the site. Based on a conversation with City of Tacoma staff, there is a six-inch water line located within this easement. lithe request for a change to Professional Office (PO) is granted, city code requires Type I landscaping to-feet wide (solid screen) adjacent to the western property line when the property.is developed. Type I landscaping consists ora mix oftrces and shrubs. City of Tacoma will replace grass, shrubs, and pavement up to two inches in width ifthe easement is dug up for repair or maintenance of the water line; however, they will not replace trees. Recent development in the vicinity includes Hoyt Road Chevron, a gas station, on the southwestern corner of this intersection. In addition, the City is presently reviewing an application for a retail development on the southeastern comer of this intersection. Page 7 of9 EXH~B~1r"J> PAGE~OF.aL Environmental Analysis: E~.f" P, n.r'1r- n. 0 ¡, '..0 -..U. PAGE (8 JF¿£ Sensitive Areas There are no environmentally sensitive areas associated with the site. The site consists of Alderwood soils on minimal slope with slight potential for erosion. Drainage The site is located within the Lower Puget Sound Sub-Basin, in an area identified for enhanced stonnwater infiltration. The applicant submitted a conceptual proposal for a 10,150 square foot office with the request. Since more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces would be created, when a land use pennit is submitted, surface water runoff and treatment would be required per the KCSWDM, the Hylebos Basin Plan, and the City's adopted SEPA policies. Potential Traffic Impacts Assuming that the request was granted by the City Council, any traffic-related impacts associated with the development of the site as a physician's clinic would be addressed as part of the SEPA process at the time that a land use penn it was submitted. Projections for Population and Employment As presently zoned (RS 9.6), there may be a potential for two to three single-family residences. If the requested change is granted, and the site is developed as a 10,150 square foot clinic with 8,758 square feet of office and 1,412 square feet of common area, there is a potential.for 35 employees based on the ratio of one employee per 250 square feet of office space. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies: Goal or Policy Comments LUPl5 Protect residential areas fÌ'om impacts of ",DlJ,e ~()tl1(~,W1~que shape and IQCation of the site, being 'f""".", n,.'," ,"'" ' , ' adjacent non-residential uses. '-ooH!ëfèdp,~J~()sidesby streets (Hoyt Road is a minor LUP48 The City shall limit new commercial '. ~~êriáfânðS~40th isa principal arterial), the site may not be sui 'IDle for single family housing. 10;, development to existing commercial areas additiQD, th~,i$a.gassti\tion(Hoyt Road Chevron) on to protect residential areas. "" '" ' " ¥ the süuthwestemcoiner of this intersection; arid the CitY~p¡èsè~Ùy~evie\\,ing an application for a retail developmen~;9Jl:1Þesouthèasterri comer. If the propošâÍ\Véré-~PI?f()yeøpursuant to a development a~m~p.t,~~ù(~~d~tióhs'(No's 1,2,4, and 5 below);Wôuid:m'fì~òi5öš~dtóenstire compliance with LUPI5. Page 8 of9 EXH~ß"T )) PAGE "OF~ " ,-' ._-'~'-',-_.,-""'~"<~'~'~~"~"""'H~~"'. \PrópôŠea"Cc)h'ditiòii'š"rõr a Development Agreement: E'tf,., ~_."1 f' .-, ,,--- ,O- p'-~ u PA~L 19 '-. ~ 1. A fence, six feet minimum in height, shall be constructed along the west boundary ofthe property. 2. The minimum height oftrees within the 10-foot wide Type I landscaping shall be eight-feet tall at planting. Said Type I landscaping shall be located along the western boundarÿ on the inside of the fence. . 3. Both the City of Tacoma and the City of Federal Way shall approve type of trees within the 20-foot City of Tacoma water easement. 4. The City of Tacoma will not replace trees within their easement, if said trees are damaged or killed during work on the underlying water line. Therefore, the property owner shall be solely responsible for replacement of these trees. 5. The building shall be no more than two-stories and 30 feet in height. 6. If the request for a change in comprehensive plan designation is granted, any future proposals shall be in substantial compliance with the conceptual plan (Exhibit C, Sheet 5 of 5). The Director of Community Development Services may administratively approve non-substantive changes. 1:\99CMP AMNIPlanning Commission 1999 Site Specific Requests,docI6I6IOO 3: 19 PM EX H " r9 "r----2L- P A G EJaD F .al- Page 9 of9 S. W. 340TH ST. S. W. 340TH ST. Proposed Designation: Comprehensive Plan: Office Park Zoning: PO _u' - . (f) d a:: ~ :r: ,. / ,City of Federal Way. Comprehensive Plan 19,99 , SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION CHANGES ~ ~ ' Velasco r4 /J Site Specific Request #3 li! . ;g~ . G) -]~ ;gm (j)~ t;,m 00 '~ -~ 0 '~ ~' N " .,'0' . FIr>' J I=-o (~ 1: () .' :z: ~ ö= ~ ~ :z: 4: I~ --1 . ::¡ - 9 II ~ ~ (.... ï GJ -16 ~k ~ 0~ .J/Q.,> ' ~.'~ 'V "" I>;-~J ~:;v.... I / If;» ---- ..--.----.. .._-- '-"-r'-¡-- -.--.,----.-- \ í _._..... .... ; ---.-....-..-.... . ~ w ~ 1;; v; i n~ 0 1.2 Mile~ 0.6 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 1999 SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION CHANGES Composite Map N City LImits . . . Potential Annexation Area . . . - Site Requests :-urn "'- : . . I .. ",""'" .: (: . ; .: ;g~ ø:x m~1 m I- ::::::::II .'.~ "'i . 0 'ì1 r-. Map Prlnted"u.e 5, 2000 c S. W. 340TH ST. S. W. 340TH ST. Proposed Designation: Comprehensive Plan: Office Park Zoning: PO cr5 d ~ ð :r: . ---,-- City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan 19,99 , SITE SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION CHANGES Velasco Site Specific Request #3 ~~ Q:J: m- ::2 m" ~~... yXi r"\? ' '" ~J ='..:::J 0 ~"::::~:J..' . I~....""': . ~ P=- l- i1¡~ f)J ¡ N ~ ~ .. ' NORTH EB -$' " ~ø &: "~(q:r ~ ~ U'r" " '~'/~ ".t{) r . ~ v , ' DE S!OOER INFORMA 11ON I ~rI þ,r- ~e,~' :-em :Þ~ r"'. .~ ..7" ~J. :":3 m. ::1 ,. 01 ~ \ ð' WIDE '1"'T"Æ III 1-ANDSCAPING PROVIDE 150'-0' HIH. FROH ,J.,D..JIo.G.ENT ~IV'!"WA'T' PER F'>"U 21-154:5 -.. ,. """,.. , '- , FROPERTf iFæ N b5'40~' H i%~ ð' WIDE T'T"PE '" 1-ANDSCoAPING H:mt f'ROt{1" Me I~ 5fW.1. ee cæs~w PER CITT" STAI-OAADS 15:5'-0' PROVIDE 150'-0' HIH. fR.CIH 1!m:R5ECT1OK ~ "".;"'" """"0 It:: I"" I. '.__1"\__..^_I.._o~1 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 906 Columbia St. SW . PO Box 48300 . Olympia, Washington 98504-8300 . (360) 753-2200 July 6, 2000 The Honorable Michael Park Mayor, City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003 Ex.H~srv » PAGEJ.líØF ..4L ((~) Dear Mayor Park: Thank you for sending the Office of Community Development (OCD) the City of Federal Way's draft comprehensive plan amendments. (OCD is part of the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development.) We recognize that the City of Federal Way has expended time, energy, and resources in developing these amendments. We have the following concerns about your amendments: . One of the goals of the Growth Management Act (GMA) is the reduction of low-density sprawl. As we noted in our earlier letter to the City, the City shouid be aware that the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board has found that densities of less than four units an acre are not considered urban densities. By not establishing a minimum density in the adopted plan's Single Family High Density designation, or even defining the term, the City could allow for development that does not provide for adequate urban densities, which does not prevent sprawl or allow for the efficient provisions of urban services. With more than 50 percent of the City's land area in a residential designation, and a vast majority of that in Single Family High Density, the adopted plan will not prevent single family residential areas from developing at less than urban densities. In fact, the City's other single-family designations, Single Family Low Density (one unit per five acres) and Single Family Medium Density (one to three units per acre), actually assure that new single-family development will not be built at urban densities. OCD recommends, as a strategy for achieving urban densities, in urban areas that are not environmentally constrained, to require parcels to be divided to minimum densities of at least four units an acre to encourage compact development within the urban growth area, to utilize land designated for urban uses efficiently, and to allow for the cost-effective provision of .@'/"" n '..1 The Honorable Michael Park July 6, 2000 Page 2 EXHIBIJ" J- P AGE -ØI!f) f --.a..l , IIC It) infrastructure and city services. All parcels do not need to be developed at the time of subdivision, but they should be platted. The development should be placed in an approp~ate manner and allowances for future infrastructure should be made so that future urban densities will not be precluded. OCD has good examples of this strategy. . The GMA requires that comprehensive plans include detailed funding plans for their Capital Facilities Element and their Transportation Element. These financial plans must look out at least six years in anticipation of current needs and projected demands. They must include those projects that will be necessary to maintain adopted level of service standards. Further, they must identify actual and probable funding sources for those projects. The GMA r(".C'.oe,n17.f>.S that the '1ep,tl for cap;.t~.I f?('!lWes and transportation iOITac:tr..lctere are òirectly related to the pattern ofland uses and densities established by jurisdictions in their comprehensive plans. Land use is the engine that drives infrastructure cost. Each city and county must, therefore, show how it will pay for the capital facilities and transportation infrastructure required to support its land use plan. Funding for the Parks and Recreation component is inadequate to meet projected funding needs. The City should revise its projected park improvements or identify new sources of funding to finance these improvements. Thank you again for sending us a copy of your draft comprehensive plan amendments. We look forward to receiving your adopted amendments. If you have any questions or concerns about our comments or any other growth management issues, please call me at (360) 586-1239, or Ike Nwankwo at (360) 586-9118. RECEIVED BY "'f'\m~1 fMITV n¡::I/El ()PMENT DEPARTM¡:::!ln Sincerely, W ~ í~ f/¿d-r- ~ . J/"" I- {/. . , ¡)a/-/// t £ 1:5æ/~ ¿7/./ ,þ~;rick Babineau .c-- . - - - Growth Management Planner Growth Management Program JUL 1 0 2000 PB:lw cc: Stephen Clifton, Community Development Director, City of Federal Way Ethan Raup, Director, Office of Policy and Regional Planning, King County Margaret H. Clark, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way Ike Nwankwo, OCD EXH ~ [\ r~ -~-,:þ PAGE:.~OF ~. From: "Suzanne Waters Akana" <suzyakana@aol.com> To: <Patrick.Briggs@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Linda.Kochmar@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Mary.Gates@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Jeanne.Burbidge@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Michael.Hellickson@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Dean.McColgan@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Phil.Watkins@ci.federal-way.wa.us> Date: 7/17/00 9:49PM Subject: Online Council Comment From Dear Council Members I am writing to you in reference to comprehensive plan changes for site specific request #3. (Velasco Request). I am writing on behalf of my family we reside at 4267 SW 338th Street. We strongly oppose the request to change the zoning from single family to office park professional office at the location of Hoyt Road SW and SW 340th Street. Our house borders the subject property. We strongly oppose this request for many different reasons. First of all as a financial standpoint from our own personal situation a medical building 20 feet away from our house would substantailly lower our property value. We bought our house with the knowledge that the property was zoned single family and that houses may be built on that property. This was compliant with the atmosphere we wanted for our family. According to the map of the site a two story thirty foot building could be built just twenty feet from our fence line. This makes our family very uncomfortable. We have two small children who play regularly in our backyard. The building would look down directly on our property. We feel this is an invasion of our privacy, and makes me nervous for the safety of our children. I know my neighbors, I don't know the people cycling through the medical office. If the medical building is built we feel that that would not be in compliance with the atmosphere we wanted for our children and would be forced to move. With the drop in property value I am afraid we could not buy an equivilant house in Federal Way and would be forced to move south for better property values. I have lived in Federal Way all my life and I love it here. The position that is being taken that the land has not been developed for resedential reasons due in part to being bordered by arterial streets on two of its three sides is unsubstantiated since directly accross the street on the North Eastern corner of 340th and Hoyt Road the houses wrap around the same type of corner. Also, we would like to point out that the recent development in the vicinity has been on the south side of 340th street the North side is all single family homes. Traffic is also an issue if the medical office was built. Increased traffic would congest the traffic light on 340th and Hoyt Road. We also heard that a right turn only would be put upbut the unfortunate truth is that most people do not follow those rules. The Chevron Station off Hoyt Road is a prime example. We feel that if this is approved that it will also adversely effect the city. Federal Way seems to have an abundance of vacant business buildings. Just take a look at Dashpoint Village, that is a sad sight. Why rezone, we are a growing city and seem to need more single family housing, why not build houses on this site. I do realize you get more income from a business, but why not fill the vacant office buildings first. In conclusion we hope that you realize that this isnot neccesarilly in ~he best interest of anyone. I just hope that in reading this you try to put yourself in our shoes. How would you feel if a thirty foot, two story building was going up twenty feet fromm your fence line, and every time you drove up your driveway you were staring at a medical building, not such a neighborhood feel anymore. Thank you for your time. Suzanne Waters Akana Please reply at your conveinence with your comments and feelings on this issue. I am very interested to see how you all see this issue and your arguements for and against. EX IJ! ~. ~ r"lT ..) !fì I L n " PAGE-.2.AOF 2.1 From: "Stephen & Dianne Waters" <Steveh2os@foxinternet.net> To: <Patrick.Briggs@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Linda.Kochmar@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Mary.Gates@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Jeanne.Burbidge@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Michael.Hellickson@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Dean.McColgan@ci.federal-way.wa.us>, <Phil.Watkins@ci.federal-way.wa.us> Date: 7/17/00 8:54PM Subject: Online Council Comment From RE: Site Specific Request # 3 (Velasco Request) Change Comprehensive Plan & zoning from high density, single family to business use. We are 24-year Federal Way residents. We became aware of the above rezone because our daughter's home adjoins the proposed rezone. Not only are we concerned by the adverse affect of a commercial business in our grandchildren's backyard, but also because we are aware of more and more commercial properties going unrented in the surrounding areas. The lack of occupants in these already established properties makes Federal Way appear to be on the decline. How can we justify rezoning existing Residential land to Commercial use in this environment? We cannot envision a need to take a clearly residential area and interject a business into it. There is no existing commercial use on the north side of S.W. 340th St. and we believe it should stay that way. The proposed rezone would likely have the following impacts: 1. Lower property values of neighboring homes (ie: two-story business & parking lot next door) 2. Increase traffic conjestion at the intersection (no good access to lot) 3. Put residents/children at increased visibility, therefore higher risk for crime 4. Leave another existing building vacant If residential homes were put on this property, with fences on the S.W. 340th & Hoyt road sides, there would be a natural Cul-de-Sac with access via a secondary road thus eliminating intersection congestion and providing a protected area for children to play. Thank you for your consideration..... Steve & Dianne Waters EXHIB~~ ":Þ~", PAGE a\OF-1L- Seplember5"; tJOOD MEETING DATE: ~OO CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ITEM# :¡L ~) SUBJECT: Traffic Safety School Ordinance CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: l CONSENT -.X ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARIN G FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ATTACHMENTS: Memo from former Chief Ron Wood regarding Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee recommendation and the proposed Traffic Safety School Ordinance. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: A Traffic Safety School was initiated to provide instruction, education, and information for the proper, lawful and safe operation of motor vehicles. In 1998 the Council set the fee for the Traffic Safety School at $50.00. Initially, the traffic infraction cases eligible for Traffic Safety School were filed in Federal Way District Court. n January 2000, the Municipal Court began operation, and the traffic infraction cases that are eligible for traffic school are now processed through the Municipal Court. The Municipal Court is authorized under the Office of the Administrator of the Courts to set fees by local court rule. Accordingly, the Municipal Court has adopted and published a local rule setting a $20.00 administrative fee for the Court for Traffic Safety School cases. The Traffic Safety School has proven to be very successful as evidenced by the increased number of classes. Staff recommends that the Traffic Safety School be established in an ordinance as the success of the program has been proven. The fees collected by the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety and by the Municipal Court reimburse costs incurred to provide and administer this program. Therefore, staff recommends the adoption of the proposed ordinance for the benefit of the citizens of Federal Way. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the July 10, 2000 meeting the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee Meeting recommended that the proposed ordinance for the Traffic Safety School be forwarded to City Council for consideration. Motion to move the ordinance to the second reading and enactment " APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: (t..J~- -flit - (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # moved 10 <¡ 15 joó for e.nadtnQl-t ¡tf) ~6~ ðJ/I/OD Item 5C CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Date: July 5, 2000 TO: Via: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee David M~anager Ronald T. Wood, Chief of Police From: Subject: Traffic School Ordinance Background: The Department of Public Safety enforces the traffic laws within the City of Federal Way, and recognizes the importance of traffic safety for health, safety and well-being of its citizens. Therefore, a Traffic Safety School was established as a benefit to the citizens of the City of Federal Way to provide instruction, education, and information for the proper, lawful and safe operation of motor vehicles. - As of January 1,2000, the Federal Way Municipal Court began operation and now has jurisdiction over traffic infractions. The Traffic School has proven to be successful and is in the best interest of the citizens of Federal Way. Therefore, it is recommended an ordinance be adopted to establish the Traffic School for the benefit of the citizens of Federal Way. Committee Recommendation: Move to approve the Ordinance establishing a Traffic Safety School to be administered by the Department of Public Safety. Q.s QIY)~nded . APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ~fj Committee Member ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT 7/';'ff/ ò ð AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING A TRAFFIC SAFETY SCHOOL TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY WHEREAS, the Department of Public Safety of City of Federal Way enforces the traffic laws within the city limits, and; WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way recognizes the importance of traffic safety for health, safety and well~being of its citizens, and; WHEREAS, a Traffic Safety School can provide the instruction, education and information for the proper, lawful and safe operation of motor vehicles, and; WHEREAS, the Department of Public Safety commenced administering a Traffic School to determine the effectiveness of such a program; and WHEREAS, the successful effectiveness of the Traffic School is now known; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Municipal Court began operation in January 1,2000, and now has jurisdiction over traffic infractions; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the establishment of a Traffic School is in the best interest of its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: Section 1. Traffic School. A Traffic Safety School is hereby authorized to be administered by the Department of Public Safety as a diversion program. ORD# ,PAGEl Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of the Traffic Safety School is to instruct, educate, and inform all enrollees in the proper, lawful, and safe operation of motor vehicles, including but not limited to rules of the road and the limitations of persons, vehicles, and bicycles and roads, streets, and highways under varying conditions and circumstances. Section 3. Fee. The Department of Public Safety shall charge a fee to Traffic School participants for the purpose of reimbursing some or all of the cost of administering the T raffie School. The amount of the fee shall be as established or amended by the City Council by resolution. Participants in the Traffic School shall remit said fee t<? the Management Services Depãrtment in accordance with the procedures established by the Department of Public Safety. Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. ORD# ,PAGEl Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and he in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final passage, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,20_. day of CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MIKE PARK ATTEST: - CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: ACTING CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. K:\ORDIN\traffic.sch Rev.0?/1O/00 ORO# ,PAGE3 ....~~ .~.! ~-~. P.~.!.~.:....~. ~P..~ ~.~~~.~. ~.~ .~QQ Q.... .......... _.. .......................... ....... ......... ....... ...!!~.~~...... .~~. ........ ..'f. J..... ..... ....- ........ '" ....... """"""""""""""'" - .............. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: 2001 CDBG Use of Funds """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""........................................................-.-.................................................................. .................""""""""""""""""""'....................,.........-. CATEGORY: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ N/A """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'.........................................................................,................................... ............................................................................ A TT ACHMENTS: A memo to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety (PRHSPS) Committee dated July 31, 2000. This includes (1) a summary chart listing each CDBG proposal, the requested amount, the recommended funding level and a brief rationale; (2) a contingency plan providing guidelines for adjusting grant awards should the funds available increase or decrease; (3) project descriptioos with staff analysis for each application, (4) a two-page overview of the CDBG program guidelines, and (5) a reference copy ofthe City's CDBG Funding Strategies, 2000-2003. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... .........................................................................................."""""'................................................................ SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Human Services Commission reviewed and evaluated 11 proposals for 2001 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. The Commission interviewed the applicants, and held a public hearing on July 17, 2000 to obtain public comment on preliminary funding recommendations. The preliminary recommendations were based on an original grant estimate of $488,302. On July 21, the City received a revised grant estimate of$591,177. The Commission's contingency plan was used to adjust the recommendations to accommodate the change in funds available. Because the revised estimates provided more funds than were requested for capital projects, the contingency plan was adjusted accordingly. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""-""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".................................................................................................... ............,..................................................... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the August 7,2000 Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety (PRHSPS) Committee meeting, the committee voted unanimously to forward the following recommendation to the City Council - The Committee recommends approval of the 2001 Community Development Block Grant Proposed Use of Funds, as presented by the Human Services Commission. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"......................................................,......................"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""'".............................. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the Council Committee recommendation ~;::~~;;~~~~;~~~~~~:$------------- , (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # i:\agndaitm\OOcouncl\ccO9-I.doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Via: Subject: July 31, 2000 Eric Olsen, Chair e ~ Human serv~' es Commission David Mos e Manager 2001 CDBG oposed Use of Funds Date: From: Background The Human Services Commission is pleased to present the 200 I Community Developtpent Block Grant (CDBG) Proposed Use of Funds. The Council Committee is asked to review the funding recommendations and forward them to the full City Council for final approval. Included with this memo is (1) a summary chart listing each project, the requested amount, the proposed funding level and a brief rationale; (2) a contingency plan providing guidelines for adjusting grant awards should the funds available increase or decrease; (3) project descriptions for each application, (4) a two-page overview of the CDBG program guidelines, and (5) a reference copy of the City's CDBG Funding Strategies, 2000-2003. The Council received a copy of the Commission's preliminary recommendations based on an original grant estimate of $488,302. On July 21, the City received a revised grant estimate of $591,177 (detailed below). The Commission's contingency plan was used to adjust the recommendations after the CDBG Public Hearing to accommodate the change in funds available. Recommendation Process The total amount of funds available for the year 2001 is estimated at $591,177. This includes: $70,863 $1,202 of2001 CDBG grant of recaptured CDBG funds from prior year projects that did not expend their total award of Federal Way Home Repair Program loans that were repaid of CDBG program income generated by interest income received from King County CDBG Consortium-wide loan programs. $488,018 $31,094 Of the $591,177 total, $434,n5 is available for capital projects (including $88,677 available to eligible economic development applications), $82,255 is available for public service programs, and $74,187 is available for planning and administration activities. On April 26, 2000, applications were received for capital projects and public service programs. Eleven proposals requested a total of $593,334. Of that total, $400,000 requested funds for capital projects and $119,147 requested for public service programs. No applications were received that were eligible for the economic development set-aside. Human Services staff prepared a proposal for the use of planning and administrative funds totaling $74,187. During weekly meetings, the Commission carefully reviewed each application and interviewed all applicants before developing a preliminary recommendation. The Commission then hosted a public hearing to collect citizen comments on the preliminary recommendations. These comments were considered as the Commission voted on the final Proposed Use of Funds. The Commission is confident that the Proposed Use of Funds complies with local and federal statutory guidelines. At the same time, it offers a diverse portfolio of projects and programs that predominantly benefit low- and moderate-income individuals. Concern Regarding Potential Barrier to Transitional Housing The application from the Federal Way Community Caregiving Network - FUSION, requested $125,000 in grant funds to purchase one condominium unit in Federal Way. This agency has five times previously used grants of $50,000 to purchase condominium units. The applicant. stated that the increased request amount was due to (1) overall increases in the cost of housing in Federal Way, and (2) a limited pool of condominium complexes where siting of transitional housing is allowed. The Federal Way Zoning Code requires that such housing units be located at a distance of 1000 feet from a similar unit. FUSION believes that the locations of their existing five units restrict them from purchasing a sixth unit in the more affordable condo complexes within the city. The Commission suggests that the Council review and the 1000 foot dispersion requirements in the Zoning Code to determine if the benefits of dispersing transitional housing units are outweighed by the increased cost borne by agencies and the City (as a granting body) to provide additional transitional housing units. Allocation of Additional Funds With our current estimate of $591,177, there are more grant funds available for capital projects ($434,735) than there. are requests ($400,000). As the City received the revised estimate amount . after the Commission's public hearing and final recommendation vote, the Commission was polled via fax and e-mail as to how to address the uncommitted grant funds. Human Services staff provided the Commission with a staff recommendation to consider. The recommendation was to revise the CDBG contingency plan to accommodate this and future changes to the grant estimate. The suggested changes are underlined on the enclosed copy of the contingency plan. Staff recommended allocating additional funds, up to $50,000 to the First Time Homebuyer Program. Funds awarded in excess of that requested can be used to benefit additional clients and the funds will be matched with King County grant funds. If uncommitted funds exceed $50,000, then a Request for Proposals would be issued by the Human Services Division based upon a recommendation from the Commission and direction from-the Council. The other option presented was maintaining the Commission's recommendation and leaving any uncommitted funds ($34,735) to be allocated in next year's CDBG funding cycle. Seven of the nine voting Commission members responded to the poll. Each respondent concurred with the staff recommendation. Since this recommendation was not discussed at a regular Commission meeting, it was not officially put to a vote. However, the Commission's recommendation via e-mail regarding allocation of the additional funding is provided for your consideration. Committee Recommendation Q) The Committee recommends approval ofthe 2001 Community Development Block Grant Proposed Use of Funds, as presented by the Human Services Commission. This recommendation is forwarded to the full City Council for consideration at the September 5, 2000 meeting. 2. The Committee recommends approval ofthe 2001 Community Development Block Grant Proposed Use of Funds, as presented by the Human Services Commission and modified by the Committee. This recommendation is forwarded to the full City Council for consideration at the September 5, 2000 meeting. Project/Program 2001 CDBG Prelimil Proposed Use of Funds Request Proposed Funding Strategy & Rationale Capital Projects Federal Way Community Caregiving Network #1: Develop a range of housing opportunities Transitional Housing for Women & $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Critical need in Federal Way for this type of housing. Applicant should Children take necessary steps to secure the most cost effective unit. Unused funds will return to CDBG pool for future allocation. Hearing, Speech and Deafness Center #3: Address human service needs Mixed-Use Office Building - Views at $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Agency provides services otherwise unavailable in this region. Project Madison ranked as a lower priority due to few city residents served from Seattle project site. HomeSight #1: Develop a range of housing opportunities First Time Homebuyer Program $ 100,000 $ 134,735 Successful revolving loan program increasing homeownership rates within Federal Way. Funds matched at greater than 1:1 ratio with King County funds. Repaid loans will revolve to assist additional households. Program is elastic and can serve three more clients with additional funds. King Co. Housing Authority & Oxford House #1: Develop a range of housing opportunities Clean and Sober Transitional Housing $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Although there is need for this type of housing, this was ranked as a lower priority due to unclear benefit to city residents. King Co. Housing and Cmty Development #1: Develop a range of housing opportunities Federal Way Home Repair Program $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Program for homelessness prevention and the only available program for preservation of housing stock. 100% city residents served. Loan repayments eventually return to city. Senior Services #3: Address human service needs Senior Services Mixed Use Project $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Ranked as a lower priority due to the project site located in Seattle serving few city residents (most agency services provided from satellite facilities in Federal Way). South King County Multi-Service Center #1: Develop a range of housing opportunities Tall Cedars Apartments Renovation $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Preserves affordable housing in S. King Co. region. Offers permanent housing options for Federal Way residents exiting the agency's emergency and transitional housing programs. Capital Projects Sub-totals $ 400,000 $ 434,735 available to allocate Project/Program 2001 CDBG Preliminary Proposed Use of Funds Request Proposed Funding Strategy & Rationale Public Services City of Federal Way - Legal Services #3: Address human service needs Domestic Violence Unit $ 56,600 $ 23,600 Partial funding to cover one part-time position (victim advocate or investigator) and purchase of interpretation services. Commission encourages the Law Dept. to assume the second requested part-time position in its general fund budget. Hotel voucher request no recommended due to duplication of services (6 existing voucher programs). Community Health Centers of King County #3: Address human service needs Dental Access Program $ 10,300 $ 10,300 Addresses critical need for dental care services available to low- and moderate-income households. Funding maintained near 2000 level ($10,000). South King County Multi-Service Center #3: Address human service needs CARES Child Care Subsidies $ 52,247 $ 48,355 Affordable child care is a critical need in community. Program funding reduced from current funding level ($50,280) due to limited funds available. Commission encourages the agency to reduce administrative costs from current 30% of program level, and continue efforts to diversify program funding base. Public Services Sub-totals $ 119,147 $ 82,255 available to allocate Planning and Administration City of Federal Way - Human Services #3, Activity 4: Administer City's CDBG program Planning and Administration $ 74,187 $ 74,187 Funds will support grant administration and special planning projects. PIng and Admin Sub-totals $ 74,187 $ 74,187 available to allocate Grand Total $ 593,334 $ 591,177 2001 CDBG CONTINGENCY PLAN The allocation process for year 2001 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds is based upon an estimate of what funds will be available that year. The City will not be informed of its exact grant amount until December 2000. For this reason, the allocation process includes a contingency plan. The plan allows for adjustment up or down based upon the final grant amount. SHOULD THE GRANT AMOUNT INCREASE OR ADDITIONAL FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE: Capital Projects ~ Any additional funds will be allocated to (1) Speech, Hearing and Deafness Center- Mixed Use Office Building to the requested level of $10,000, then to (2) King County Housing Authority/Oxford House - Clean and Sober Transitional Housing to the requested level of $20,000, then to (3) Senior Services - Mixed Use Office Building to the requested level of $15,000, then to (4) Federal Way Community Caregiving Network, FUSION - Transitional Housing to the requested level of $125,000. Additional funds, if under $50,000 in total, will be allocated to HomeSiqht - First Time Homebuyer Proqram. If additional funds are in excess of $50,000, funds will be allocated to a project or projects selected throuqh a Request for Proposals (RFP) process. Public Service Programs ~ Any additional funds will be allocated to the South King County Multi-Service Center - CARES Child Care Subsidy Program to the requested level or $52,247, with any additional funds allocated to capital projects in accordance with the priority order listed above. Planning and Administration Activities ~ Any additional funds for planning and administration activities will be allocated to capital projects in accordance with the priority order listed above. SHOULD THE GRANT AMOUNT DECREASE: Capital Projects ~ Decreases will first be made to HomeSiqht - First Time Homebuyer Proqram down to their requested amount of $100,000, if their award exceeds that amount. Additional decreases will be made to all capital projects, exclusive of South King County Multi-Service Center - Tall Cedars Renovation, in proportion to the percentage decrease in grant funds. Public Service Programs ~ Decreases will be made to all public service programs in proportion to the percentage decrease in grant funds. Planning and Administration Activities ~ Funding for consultant and purchased service activities will be decreased to their full extent before decreases are made to administrative activities. 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: Minimum: Transitional Housing for Homeless Women & Children Capital Projects $125,000 $100,000 Applicant: Federal Way Community Caregiving Network - FUSION One Sentence Use of Funds Grant will be used to purchase a condominium to temporarily house families in transition in the Federal Way community. Eligible Activity: Public Facilities and Improvements (Special Needs Housing) National Objective: Low/Mod Income Benefit - Housing Local Strategy #1: Develop a range of housing opportunities aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing... Create housing opportunities for seniors, youth, and special needs groups and impact the availability of transitional housing and emergency shelters. Project Description This project will assist FUSION in acquiring one condominium unit in Federal Way. The unit will be used to provide no cost transitional housing (including rent, utilities, and telephone) as a bridge between emergency housing and public housing for women and their young children. These families are screened and placed by the South King County YWCA and can stay for a period of six months to one year. The goal ofthe program is to assist these families in achieving self- sufficiency by providing no cost housing and other services as needed. This will be the sixth condominium to serve as a temporary home for women and their children. All units are located in Federal Way. The YWCA provides the case management for the program. Five to ten eligible families are screened for every opening in these units during the year. If funded, FUSION will locate and purchase the condominium by mid- to late-200t. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) Even with public assistance from the State, homeless families are still unable to afford housing - up to seventy percent of newly homeless families in the state are already receiving public assistance. The FUSION housing unit allows recently homeless Federal Way families to stay in the area while the parent works to find stable employment. After five years in operation, there has not been a vacancy at any ofthe five FUSION units for a period longer than two weeks. Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) FUSION's requested amount was based upon discussion with City staff and a local real estate professional. In previous years (1995 to 1998), FUSION has been able to find condominiums in Federal Way selling for approximately $50,000. This is no longer possible in today's real estate Olccappsums Page 1 2001 CDBG Application Summary market. Project costs are also affected by the City's zoning code, which requires that transitional housing units be placed over 1,000 feet away from any existing transitional housing unit. The 2001 request is based upon the assumption that the next condominium unit will have to be located in an area of Federal Way outside ofthe Pac Highway corridor - where average acquisition costs will be higher. The benefit of purchasing a newer, higher priced unit will be a probable reduction in FUSION's annual maintenance costs. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) FUSION is volunteer-run agency. As additional units are added to the agency's portfolio, concern increases regarding the capacity of the agency to raise annual operating funds to support each unit. Those costs include operating and maintenance expenses for each unit, and a contract with South King County YWCA for case management. This is not a yet a major concern as the agency has been operating five units without difficulty for the past two years. Additionally, if the unit purchased with 2001 funds is fairly new, the burden of extra maintenance costs should be minimal for the foreseeable future. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG TOTAL COST $125,000.00 $125,000.00 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share None* 100% The five existing FUSION units were funded with CDBG in 1995, 1996 and 1998. 01 ccappsums Page 2 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: Minimum: Hearing, Speech and Deafness Center - Views at Madison Capital Projects $15,000 $8,000 Applicant: Hearing, Speech and Deafness Center (HSDC) One Sentence Use of Funds: Grant will fund construction costs for the office and program space in the HSDC's new facility. Eligible Activity: Public Facilities and Improvements National Objective: LowlMod Income Benefit - Limited Clientele - Presumed benefit (Severely Disabled) Local Strategy: #3: Address human service needs which focus upon self-supporting systems that empower families and community to make contributions to their own well-being and enhance the quality of their lives. Project Description Grant funds are requested for new construction of a mixed use building in downtown Seattle that will include 30,000 square feet of program, office and retail space for the Hearing Speech and Deafness Center. Above will be five floors of affordable housing for households between 30 and 80 percent of the median income range. The project includes 150 underground parking stalls. The housing portion of this project is proposed to be funded by the Washington State Housing Finance Commission Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. HSDC will demolish and rebuild on 1.4 acres of property where the HSDC has been located for the past 37 years. As per CDBG regulations, grant funds can only be used for the construction of the programmatic office space. Services that will be provided from this location include the Audiology program, Speech - Language Pathology Program, the HSDC retail store, Parent Infant Program, Training Assessment and Placement Program, Community Education and Training, as well as the possibility of a new child care program and physical and occupational therapy program. If successful in receiving funding, the applicant believes this project can be complete by April 2002. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) The key point of consideration is how this project will benefit residents of the City of Federal Way. The application indicates that three percent of the overall client load resides in Federal Way. When asked to describe the source of this information, the applicant responded that client residence was pulled from the agency's 1999 client database. The applicant is seeking to match the funding sources for the project to the clientele base. They have applied to the Cities of Seattle, Bellevue, and six other smaller suburban cities in King County. 01 ccappsums Page 3 2001 CDBG Application Summary The application indicates that the main benefit of this project will be a consolidation of office space for the agency and the new housing units produced. Due to CDBG regulations, grant funds may only be used for programmatic office space (as opposed to general administrative space). For the purposes of this grant request, there appears to be no additional or new services that will be made possible by the project. There is mention of possible new programs in the future. Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) The proposed funding package is uncommon, as the City of Federal Way has not funded a project located in Seattle (a similarly structured application was received but not funded last year). Neither do we know of a case where the City of Seattle has funded a project located in Federal Way. While the applicant estimates that three percent of the clientele come from Federal Way, the funding request equals less than one percent of the total budget. The project budget is sound. The CDBG request is coming at the very beginning of the funding process. No other public funding sources have been secured at this time. To facilitate the process, HSDC has hired Common Ground, a nonprofit development consultant, who has extensive background in managing CDBG funded development projects. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) HSDC has been operating as a non-profit in the Seattle area for almost 50 years. Significant operating revenue is generated through the agency's fee-based services and their retail store. While they have no background in real estate development or property management, they have hired respected development consultants and management firms for the construction and long- term operation of the new housing and office space. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG King County Federal Other CDBG PrivateIF oundations TOT AL COST $10,000 $50,000 $1,180,000 $340,000 $3,214,621 $4,794,621 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share None 0.2% Olccappsums Page 4 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: FirstHomes Program of South King County Category: Capital Projects Request: $100,000 Minimum: None Applicant: HomeSight One Sentence Use of Funds: Approved funds will be used as direct loan assistance to first-time buyers earning at or below 80% of King County Median Income to achieve ownership in the City of Federal Way. Eligible Activity: Homeownership Assistance National Objective: Low/Mod Income Benefit - Housing Local Strategy #1: Develop a range of housing opportunities aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing... Create housing opportunities for seniors, youth, and special needs groups and impact the availability of transitional housing and emergency shelters. Project Description This project will help provide financing for nine new first-time buyers in Federal Way who earnat or below 80% of the King County median. The loan terms are three percent interest accrued annually with deferred principle payment for seven years, with principle plus interest due beginning in year eight. The loan amount offered is based upon the client's need. The range of assistance varies between $10,000 and $25,000 per household with an average loan amount being $23,000. These funds will enhance the existing FirstHomes revolving loan fund where local funds are matched with King County Housing Finance Program funds. In previous years, the Cities of Federal Way, Kent, Auburn and Tukwila have funded this loan pool. HomeSight provides education and counseling services for all FirstHomes clients (on campus at Highline Community College and at HomeSight's office in Kent). These services are primarily supported with private funds. Outreach to potential clients is made through a community-based approach in cooperation with private lenders, real estate professionals and participating cities. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) The Puget Sound area is recognized as the eighth most expensive real estate market in the country. A household making $30,000 and paying five percent down has a purchase affordability of $87,400. Only 400 homes (1 %) in King County sold for this amount or less last year. Federal Way's 1999 median home price was $176,500. To buy here, a household must earn $47,066 gross annually. Although funded in 1997 and 1998, the FirstHomes program did not begin offering purchase 01 ccappsums Page 5 2001 CDBG Application Summary assistance to clients until the beginning of 1999 (delay was due to regional coordination and contracting processes - not due to the program). In thirteen months beginning in February 1999, HomeSight issued $253,200 in purchase assistance within Federal Way ($512,440 in South King County). Of that total, $90,000 was Federal Way CDBG and funds and $163,200 was matched King County funds. This is a ratio of King County to City funds of 1.81. The past expenditure rates indicate that HomeSight will be able to issue the full request during 2001. As interest rates continue to rise over time, more and more moderate-income households will need assistance in moving from rent to home ownership. Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) The funds invested in this program are given to a revolving loan fund. Similar to the City's home repair program, principal and interest are repaid to the loan pool and redistributed to new Federal Way clients. Over time, this loan fund will be self-supporting, however due to the structure of the loans, funds will not begin revolving for another six years (assuming no early repayments). Purchase assistance has been extremely cost effective in the previous years. City contribution to the purchase assistance has been limited to $10,000 per household. This has been matched with up to $15,000 of King County funds. FirstHomes clients are required to provide a down payment at a minimum of two percent of the purchase price. Additionally, FirstHomes clients receive comprehensive homeownership education and counseling at no cost to the City. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) HomeSight has been providing first-time homebuyer education, counseling and loan assistance and newly constructed homes (for sale) to low- and moderate-income buyers since 1990. Two years ago, HomeSight expanded their program from Seattle to South King County and Snohomish County. Since 1990, HomeSight has created nearly 600 new homeowners, constructed 171 homes and has administered $6.3 million in buyer assistance loans. Nineteen new homeowners have been assisted in Federal Way. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG King County Buyer Cash Other CDBG Private / Foundation TOTAL COST 100,000 350,000 120,000 280,000 2,700,000 3,550,000 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share None* 2.8% *This program was funded in 1997 and 1998 at $25,000 and $75,000 respectively. 01 ccappsums Page 6 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: Minimum: Clean and Sober Housing Capital Projects $20,000 None Applicant: King County Housing Authority/Oxford House One Sentence Use of Funds: Acquisition of a 3000+ square feet single-family house in South King County, to be rehabilitated and used as transitional housing for persons in recovery. Eligible Activity: Rehabilitation National Objective: Low/Mod Income Benefit - Housing Local Strategy # 1: Develop a range of housing opportunities aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing... Create housing opportunities for seniors, youth, and special needs groups and impact the availability of transitional housing and emergency shelters. Project Description The goal of Oxford House is to provide a supportive, clean and sober living environment in which residents can pursue a program of recovery. This housing provides a transition time between treatment and full recovery. Although there is no time limit, most residents remain for about a year. The goal is to purchase a newer home constructed in 1980 or later that needs a minimum of rehabilitation to accommodate the program. The living arrangements will be that of a single family with residents sharing common spaces. It will house eight residents with four sharing bedrooms and four with individual bedrooms. All residents participate in the management of the house, tasks/duties are rotated among members and none are permitted to opt out. No social services are provided on site. Oxford Houses focus on providing a supportive environment where a highly democratic form of house management serves as training for learning new behaviors. There are 15 Oxford Houses in King County. Two are located in South King County (Burien and Renton). If successful in receiving funding, the applicant believes this site can be acquired by March 2001. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) Housing for persons in recovery is in short supply throughout King County. Each year about 1,400 unduplicated persons exit Cedar Hills Treatment Facility (just south of Seattle). Another 3,600 persons complete treatment at 10 other facilities in King County. According to the King County Housing and Community Development Plan, there is a need for 700 more transitional housing units for persons in recovery. Eighty-two percent of the existing housing resources for this population are located in Seattle, with thirteen percent in South King County. 01 ccappsums Page 7 2001 CDBG Application Summary Potential tenants apply to the Oxford House based upon their own geographic preference. The residents of the house then select from the applications received for any opening that occurs. Although highly probable that Federal Way residents would choose to apply to a South King County Oxford House, there is no guarantee that city residents will be served. Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) The majority of the project budget is given to property acquisition costs. The estimated costs are extremely preliminary, as no site has yet been identified. The anticipated costs seem sufficient to cover the acquisition of a six-bedroom home. The most difficult aspect of this project will be locating an existing six bedroom home (big enough to accommodate eight individuals) that is near shopping and transit. If required, the project includes funds to rehabilitate or modify the structure to meet the needs of the program. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) The King County Housing Authority will be the property owner and manager. KCHA owns over 400 units of housing in Federal Way ranging from single-family homes to large-scale apartment complexes. Oxford Houses of Washington is a state chapter of a national organization. They will oversee the day-to-day operation. Oxford House has 77 houses in Washington State with 15 in King County (there are no Oxford Houses located between Renton and Tacoma). Each Oxford House is self-sufficient, providing enough operating support through rents charged to each resident. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG King County State Auburn CDBG TOTAL COST 20,000 205,285 212,100 10,000 447,385 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share None 4.5% Olccappsums Page 8 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: Minimum: Senior Services Mixed Use Project Capital Projects $15,000 $10,000 Applicant: Senior Services One Sentence Use of Funds: Grant will fund construction costs for the office and program space in the Senior Services new facility. Eligible Activity: Public Facilities and Improvements National Objective: LowlMod Income Benefit - Limited Clientele - Presumed benefit Local Strategy # 1: Develop a range of housing opportunities aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing... Create housing opportunities for seniors, youth, and special needs groups and impact the availability of transitional housing and emergency shelters. Project Description This proposed project is an 8-story, 35,700 square foot, new construction building that will include 3 floors with 16,700 square feet for Senior Services programs and 19,000 square feet (25 units) of low-income senior housing. The project will be located in downtown Seattle. The Senior Services office space will include nine Senior Services programs. The seniors who live in the building will have easy access to and be linked with Senior Services programs and the Senior Health and Wellness Center. There will be a rooftop garden that will be available for Senior Services clients and housing residents. If successful in receiving funding, the applicant believes this project can be complete by August 2002. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) Senior Services is the largest provider of services for seniors in King County, serving 50,000 seniors per year. Twenty-eight thousand of those seniors are served through programs located in the downtown Seattle location. Due to steadily increasing leasing costs, Senior Services must vacate its current location by Summer 2002. Senior Services anticipates the need for services to increase significantly over the next twenty years and there is currently a significant increase in service needs for persons over age 85. From the Project Benefit section of the application (question 13), less than two percent ofthe clients served by this project would be from Federal Way. When asked to provide the source for project benefit numbers, the applicant responded that client residence is asked when a client calls or comes in to the Seattle facility. Similar to the Speech, Hearing and Deafness Center (HSDC) proposal, it will be important to show how Federal Way residents are directly served at the project 01 ccappsums Page 9 2001 CDBG Application Summary location. With this agency, there is an indirect benefit, as programs offered by the agency in Federal Way will be administered from the new project site. These programs include Meals on Wheels, Congregate Meals and Volunteer Transportation Services (all funded through the Human Services General Fund). Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) Like the HSDC proposal, the funding package is uncommon as the City of Federal Way has not funded a project located in Seattle (a similarly structured application was received but not funded last year). Neither do we know of a case where the City of Seattle has funded a project located in Federal Way. While the applicant estimates that 1.9 percent of the clientele come from Federal Way, the funding requests equals 0.36 percent of the total budget. The project budget is sound. The CDBG request is coming at the very beginning of the funding process. No other public funding sources have been secured at this time. To facilitate the process, Senior Services has hired Common Ground, a nonprofit development consultant, who has extensive background in CDBG funded development projects. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) Senior Services is a large, well-respected nonprofit organization. They receive programmatic operating support from several South King County cities for services they provide across King County. While they have no track record in real estate development, they have hired respected and capable development consultants for the construction of the new housing and office space. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG King County Capital Campaign Other CDBG Private TOTAL COST $15,000 $150,000 $2,617,248 $385,000 $1,000,000 $4,167,248 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share None 0.36% Olccappsums Page 10 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: Minimum: Tall Cedars Apartments Capital Projects $10,000 None Applicant: South King County Multi-Service Center (SKCMSC) One Sentence Use of Funds: Funds will be used towards the acquisition and rehabilitation of 24 apartment units for very low and low-income families in South King County. Eligible Activity: Rehabilitation National Objective: Low/Mod Income Benefit - Housing Local Strategy # 1: Develop a range of housing opportunities aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing... Create housing opportunities for seniors, youth, and special needs groups and impact the availability of transitional housing and emergency shelters. Project Description The Tall Cedars Apartments are located at 1315 - 31 sl Street in Auburn. There are 24 apartment units with approximately 800 square feet of space including two bedrooms and a bath. The complex is two stories and sits on 39,878 square feet of property. There is a playground at the end of the property. This project will rehabilitate the property, upgrade the quality of the housing units, and guarantee that rents will remain affordable to low- and moderate-income households. The SKCMSC, as landlord, will work with the Auburn Police Department to reduce the historically high number of calls and complaints from this building - working toward a healthier atmosphere for children and their families. The Auburn YMCA and Auburn Youth Resource Center are located within two miles. A purchase and sale agreement is already in place. If successful in receiving funding, the applicant believes this site can be acquired by May 2001. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) South King County is the last region of King County that has a stock of rental housing affordable to a wide range of income levels. This project will preserve current affordable housing, as rent charged will be dictated by the income of the tenants rather than the overall current market for rental housing. Rents will be kept affordable for households making 30 to 55 percent of the King County median income. Thirty percent of median for a family of four is $19,750. Fifty-five percent of median for a family of four is $36,190. Once a family moves into the project, they will become Auburn residents. However, these families may come from any South King County city prior to moving into this complex. The application to Federal Way is made on the premise that housing is a regional issue and will be supported by south 01 ccappsums Page 11 2001 CDBG Application Summary county cities, even if not located in the funding city. In 1998, the City funded a similar type of project in Des Moines (Victorian Place II). For that project, the applicant offered that marketing would take place in the cities that funded the project for future vacancies. Also, Federal Way families going through the SKCMSC's emergency and transitional housing programs will have access to this property for permanent housing (as vacancies allow). Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) Costs for the project have been developed in a conservative manner with sufficient contingencies built into the budget to cover unanticipated or underestimated costs. The benefits of this project are that the applicant has secured the project site and 36 percent of the budget has already been secured. The applicant proposes to use City CDBG funds for purchase of major appliances for kitchen upgrades in each unit (CDBG regulations require that any equipment purchased by permanently installed in the unit). Public subsidy toward the preservation of existing affordable housing is often more cost-efficient than subsidy of new affordable housing construction. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) The SKCMSC has over 100 housing units in their ownership including emergency, transitional and affordable rental housing. The agency is currently pursuing funding for four different housing projects in South King County (this project in Auburn, one in Kent and two in Federal Way). If they are successful in receiving funding for all their projects, a capacity question during implementation might arise. However, the agency has established several partnerships with other non-profits and housing development consultants to limit their investment of time and agency resources in anyone project. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG King County Private Lender State Auburn CDBG Other - W A Convention TOTAL COST $10,000 $649,058 $350,000 $404,982 $20,000 $250,000 $1,684,040 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share $35,677* 0.59% *The 2000 awards were for different capital projects. 0] ccappsums Page ]2 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: Domestic Violence Unit Public Services $60,550 Applicant: City of Federal Way - Legal Services (CFW - Law) One Sentence Use of Funds Funding will provide the program with its part-time victim advocate, a part-time investigator, hotel vouchers for victims, training for advocates and educational pamphlets. Eligible Activity: Public Service National Objective: Low/Mod Income Benefit - Limited Clientele - Presumed Benefit Local Strategy #3: Address human service needs which focus upon self-support systems that empower families and communities to make contributions to their own well-being and enhance the quality of life. Project Description The Federal Way Domestic Violence Unit (DV Unit) provides Domestic Violence Victim Advocates for residents of Federal Way who are victims of domestic abuse. These Advocates promote victim safety, abuser accountability, and community awareness through education, prevention, intervention and treatment. The Advocate Program serves as a victim's guide through the legal system. The DV Unit's goals are to aid in safety planning for victims, as well as to refer them to other agencies that are able to meet their specific needs, i.e. shelters and financial aid. Advocates also collect information that is useful and relevant to the case thereby assisting in the prosecution of the defendant batterers. The program also provides follow-up services to assure that the batterers are following court assigned treatment programs. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) During 1999, the City's Domestic Violence Unit pursued 451 cases. That translates to approximately 38 cases every month. The DV Unit offers services to victims of these offenses by offering them assistance in seeking the full protection available to them by the law. The Unit also helps clients understand and access the different types of services that are available. If necessary, the Unit will assist a victim in leaving the home. For clients who are limited English speaking, the applicant makes use of translators and a network of ethnic counseling agencies. Education and advocacy for this group of clients is particularly needed, as they tend to be less aware of their rights in the legal system. Maintaining funding for the 0.5 FTE Victim Advocate will enable the program to serve 336 victims above that which will be served by the 1.0 FTE position that is funded through the City's General Fund. The second 0.5 FTE, if funded, will enable the program to offer more assistance in the prosecution ofbatterers resulting in an increased rate of conviction (forty percent of last year's cases were dismissed due to lack of evidence or witnesses). Likewise, the other elements of the Olccappsums Page 13 2001 CDBG Application Summary program under this request (the hotel vouchers and pamphlets) will not increase the unduplicated number of victims served, but will increase the level of service that can be provided to each victim. If these elements receive funding, the applicant will be asked to develop perfonnance measures for them (such as number of hotel vouchers distributed). The outcome measures provided in the application will build upon data collected in previous years and will attempt to track the number of successful prosecutions resulting in guilty verdicts, plea agreements, or batterers entering court ordered treatment/education programs. Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) The City assumed responsibility for the prosecution of domestic violence from King County in 1997. A one person DV Unit was established with CDBG funds in 1998. The cost of that position was transferred to the City General Fund in 1999. CDBG funds in 1999 and 2000 have supported an additional part-time position to assist with the workload and broaden the number of services available to victims. Assuming full funding at $60,550 and 3,120 hours of advocacy, CDBG funds will support domestic violence advocacy and prosecution at a rate of $19.40 per hour. In past years, CDBG has contributed primarily labor costs. The request for 2001 includes labor and adds funds to start a hotel voucher program and reproduce infonnational brochures. The hotel voucher program raises questions. There is no doubt that the service would be a valuable addition to the DV Unit program. However, there are six voucher programs currently available to Federal Way residents through various emergency assistance programs. The applicant believes that they need to be able to issue vouchers immediately rather than working through a separate non-profit group. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) As stated, this project is currently in its third year of CDBG funding and is applying for a fourth year. It has shown growth over the time it has been funded with CDBG and has provided a valuable service to the residents of Federal Way. The City's Legal Services Department has also shown its intent to provide long tenn operating support by adding one FTE position (funded by CDBG in 1998) to the City's 1999 to 2000 budget. As of now, it is unknown what components of the DV Unit will be funded in the City's 2001 to 2002 budget. The City also contributes materials, supplies and administrative assistance to the DV Unit. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG Federal Way General Fund TOTAL COST $60,550 $106,531 $167,081 2000 Funds Received CDBG Share $21,648 36.2% 0] ccappsums Page ]4 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: Dental Access Public Services $10,300 Applicant: Community Health Centers of King County (CHCKC) One Sentence Use of Funds CHCKC will use Federal Way CDBG funds to provide routine and emergency dental care to low- and moderate-income Federal Way residents. Eligible Activity: Public Service National Objective: Low/Mod Income Benefit - Limited Clientele - Agency Maintains Proof Local Strategy #3: Address human service needs which focus upon self-support systems that empower families and communities to make contributions to their own well-being and enhance the quality of life. Project Description Federal Way Dental Access provides operative, preventative, restorative and emergency dental care to low and moderate-income Federal Way residents. At least 85% ofthe Federal Way patients served through this program will have family incomes at 80% or below King County median income. Services are provided on a sliding-fee scale, according to family size and income. Interpretation services are provided free of charge for clients with limited English speaking ability, hearing impairment and sight impairment. Federal Way Community Dental Center recently established weekly half day emergency walk-in clinics at which no appointments are scheduled and only urgent care cases are served. The patients are triaged to prioritize the severity of cases. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) According to statistics provided by the applicant, less than one-third of Medicaid enrolled children in South King County received dental care in the previous year. Access to dental care for uninsured adults is also extremely difficult. This is due to a lack of dentists willing to serve these client groups. CHCKC has addressed these needs by focusing their dental services on family practice and on adults with emergency dental needs. The agency is on the right track with development of their outcome measures. Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) The City funds the Dental Access program through both CDBG and Human Service Fund programs. The CDBG award has been used to fund a portion of one dentist's salary at the Federal Way clinic. The City's CDBG contribution supports a small portion ofthe overall program budget (two percent). An average dental visit costs approximately $120. The average subsidized portion 01 ccappsums Page 15 2001 CDBG Application Summary for an uninsured client is $89. Funds provided by Federal Way CDBG will support 116 dental visits over the course of the year. CHCKC's operating budget is broad based and includes all levels of government. CHCKC has consistently been able to maintain its existing services while expanding to other parts of the County . Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) CHCKC has been providing dental care services in Federal Way for the past five years. Dental services are also offered in Kent and Auburn. The applicant has the expertise and experience to continue operating this program. In addition, CHCKC employs staffwho are representative of their client population. Approximately 29 percent of the Federal Way Community Dental Center staff are members of an ethnic minority - including Eastern European, Hispanic, and Asian American. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG Federal Way General Fund King County Federal State Fees for Service City of SeaTac United Way Additional grants TOT AL COST $10,300 $15,450 $22,177 $45,796 $21,230 $320,329 $3,536 $7,460 $28,190 $474,468 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share $10,000* 2.2% *This program also received $15,000 in Human Services General Fund 01 ccappsums Page 16 2001 CDBG Application Summary Title: Category: Request: CARES Child Care Subsidy Program Public Services $52,247 Applicant: South King County Multi-Service Center (SKCMSC) One Sentence Use of Funds CDBG funds will be used to supply scholarships for low and moderate-income families in Federal Way who are in need of quality childcare for their school age children. Eligible Activity: Public Services National Objective: Low/Mod Income Benefit -- Limited Clientele -- Agency Maintains Proof Local Strategy #3: Address human service needs which focus upon self-support systems that empower families and communities to make contributions to their own well-being and enhance the quality of life. Project Description The CARES Program provides childcare subsidies for low and moderate-income families in Federal Way. The scholarships are provided to families whose income is not high enough to afford quality childcare, but not low enough to be eligible for State assistance. The program includes before and after school care as well as summer and school break child care services. The scholarships allow parents to work or attend school or other training opportunities while feeling assured that their children are in properly supervised learning programs and age-appropriate activities. From 1992 to 1998, the City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department administered the program. As of January 1999, the SKCMSC assumed administration of the program, with the local YMCA providing service delivery supervision. The agencies providing childcare for the CARES program include the YMCA, Medallion Children's Services, and Rainbow Connection. The program has sites in 11 Federal Way elementary schools. Feasibility Demonstrated Need and Effect of Project (including performance and outcome measures) The application describes the need for the program, but does not provide quantitative information, which would give a sense of the scope of the need for subsidized childcare services. Based on performance in previous years, the performance measures look realistic. The proposed outcome measures are on the right track. Program staff have participated in outcomes training and technical assistance sessions. The program is serving an ethnically diverse population. Translation services are utilized as needed to assist clients. Fiscal Evaluation (including appropriate funding sources, cost-effectiveness, realistic expenditure levels) CDBG funds will be used for: 1) South King County Multi-Service Center staff (.25 FTE) to 01 ccappsums Page 17 2001 CDBG Application Summary provide program planning, oversight and fund development (15 percent of budget); 2) YMCA staff to provide day to day program operations, oversight of and coordination with the child care providers, program development, and tracking service statistics (13 percent of budget); 3) Child care subsidies (72 percent of budget). There are no significant changes from last year's proposal. Regarding cost-effectiveness, the application states that 55 children will be served with the funds requested ($1,073 per child), but does not provide information on the level of services to be provided to those residents, such as the number of child care days or hours provided. Without information on the level of services to be provided, it is difficult to assess cost-effectiveness of the program and the value that the City will receive for the funds requested. The agency has been asked to estimate the number of childcare days or hours to be provided in 2001. The City's 2000 CDBG contract with this agency is for $50,280 to serve 35 children, which is $1,437 per child. The funds requested from the City represent 89 percent of the program budget and Federal Way residents represent 100 percent of the caseload. Capacity of Applicant (to manage project and/or provide long-term operating support) The applicant partnership of the South King County Multi-Service Center (SKCMSC) and the YMCA is well qualified to provide this service. Both agencies are lead providers in human services in Federal Way. Both agencies have many years of experience and expertise in operating social service programs and serving low and moderate-income residents. The partnership agencies are committed to providing quality childcare and to seeking out financial resources to adequately fund the program. Together, the SKCMSC and the YMCA have the capacity to run a strong, well- managed childcare program. Project Revenue Sources Federal Way CDBG Federal Way General Fund Donations TOTAL COST $52,247 2000 Funds Received Federal Way Share 50,280 88.6% $6,753 $59,000 01 ccappsums Page 18 ¡g~eRAL ~~ RY" OVERVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT INTRODUCTION The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program provides an annual grant to entitled cities and counties. The purpose of this grant is to help develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. The City of Federal Way receives its CDBG allocation through the King County CDBG Consortium. The allocation is based upon the City's population and percentage share of low- and moderate income individuals. The City implements programs by contracting for services with its own departments or through area non-profit agencIes. NATIONAL OBJECTIVES The Community Development Block Grant can be used to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development, and providing improved community facilities and public services. The City funds CDBG programs by means of an annual application process. Each project or program proposal is measured against locally established goals and three nationally established objectives. The national objectives support activities that: . Benefit low- and moderate-income persons; . Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or . Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs (i.e. disaster recovery relief). In general, the City of Federal Way does not exhibit the characteristics necessary for a project to be justified under the second or third objectives. Therefore, the vast majority of the City's CDBG projects are justified under the first objective oflow- and moderate-income benefit. Source: Code of Federal Regulations Title 24, Part 570 (24 CFR 570) ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTION OF ACTIVITIES EXAMPLES The criteria for how an activity may be considered to benefit low- and moderate-income persons are divided into four subcategories: . Those involving area benefit, Those serving a limited clientele (i.e. the disabled or elderly), Those involving housing, and Those involving job creation or retention. . . . Once a project meets a national objective, it must also qualify as an eligible activity under local and federal requirements. CDBG funds may be used for activities that include, but are not limited to: . Acquisition, disposition, or clearance of real property; Rehabilitation of residential and non-residential structures; Construction of public facilities and improvements, such as water and sewer facilities, streets, and neighborhood centers; Direct human services; Homeownership assistance programs; Activities relating to energy conservation and renewable energy resources, and Assistance to for-profit businesses to carry out neighborhood economic development or job creation or retention activities. . . . . . . The City, as a CDBG recipient, can undertake activities directly, or can identify a sub-recipient to undertake activities. Sub-recipients are public or private non-profit agencies, authorities, or organizations. CDBG assistance to private for-profit businesses is allowed with the addition of an extra level of regulatory scrutiny and performance reporting. Exceptions to this rule include aid given to microenterprises (businesses employing less than five persons) and exterior rehabilitation of commercial buildings. Since Federal Way incorporated, a wide variety of programs and projects have benefited from complete or partial CDBG funding. . Reconstruction of sidewalks for wheelchair accessibility Transitional shelter for homeless women and children Signalized pedestrian crossing in a lower income neighborhood Child care subsidy program First time homeownership program Domestic Violence Advocacy program Public improvements in the International District Home repair loan and grant program . . . . . . Source: . Code of Federal Regulations Title 24, Part 570 (24 CFR 570) .Of~ ~ EDERAL ~~ RY" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOUR-YEAR STRATEGIES, 2000-2003 The Housing and Community Development F our- Year Strategies evolved from the 1993 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Local Program Policies. The strategies were developed in 1994 and updated in 1995. At that time they were given a four-year term, from 1996 to 1999. They were revisited in 1998 and again in 1999. In May 1999, the strategies were renewed for another four year term, 2000 to 2003. These strategies provide guidelines for the allocation of CDBG funds and are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan developed under the Growth Management Act and the Human Services Comprehensive Plan. GOAL STATEMENT Service needs for City residents far outweigh the availability of resources. As a relatively newly incorporated jurisdiction with a large and diverse population, the City is faced with the challenge of providing services that address needs in the areas of affordable and special needs housing, human services and community development. The City will use CDBG funds to develop a viable community in which quality of life is enhanced by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and by expanding economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income persons. OBJECTIVES ~ To fund projects which address local needs and strategies ~ To ensure that the basic human service needs oflow- and moderate-income persons are addressed ~ To adequately address the City's housing needs to accommodate projected growth in low- and moderate-income households, as well as senior and special needs populations ~ To preserve the existing housing stock ~ To stimulate economic development and strengthen the City's infrastructure Four-Year Strategies Page 2 of 5 NEEDS The City of Federal Way has identified housing and non-housing community development needs through public involvement activities, studies, needs assessments, and planning processes. 1. Public and Community Facilities Improvements - Senior and Community Centers, Child Care Centers, Parks and Recreation Facilities, and Health and Social Services Facilities which predominantly serve low- and moderate-income persons and address severe health and safety problems. 2. Housing - Affordable housing for low- and moderate-income people, seniors, special needs populations, transitional housing and emergency shelters, and preservation of existing housing stock. 3. Accessibility - Modifications to community facilities and existing structures to remove barriers and improve safety conditions especially for elderly and disabled persons. 4. Infrastructure Improvement - Neighborhood revitalization projects such as Surface Water Improvements, Street, Sidewalk and Pedestrian Crossing Improvements, Transportation Improvements, and Street Lighting. 5. Public Services - Projects which meet the following City Council human services goals: >- support basic human needs through funding of emergency services; >- support a strong service delivery system that increases public safety; >- provides support that supplements federal, state, and county programs designed to increase self-sufficiency and independence; and >- support service models that improve community-based collaboration and build strong neighborhoods. 6. Planning and Administration - CDBG Program staffing and administration, planning for affordable housing resource development and potential annexation areas. i: \bgg enral\bgstrats. doc Four-Year Strategies Page 3 of 5 STRATEGIES The City of Federal Way adopts the following three strategies to guide funding decisions for the annual Community Development Block Grant allocation. Strategy #1 Develop a range of housing opportunities aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing to accommodate the projected growth in low- and moderate-income households. Create housing opportunities for seniors, youth, special needs groups and impact the availability of transitional housing and emergency shelters. ~ Activity I Preservation of housing stock in existing neighborhoods has been cited as an important community value in Federal Way, one which played a large role in the community's decision to incorporate. The City will maintain a Housing Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Program to maintain health and safety standards in the homes of low- and moderate- income households and persons with disabilities. ~ Activity 2 According to established service providers, suburban homelessness is increasing. There is a limited supply of transitional and emergency shelter facilities in South King County to meet this overwhelming need. The City will continue to support local and regional shelter and transitional housing service providers. The City will encourage and support more homelessness prevention services, including youth shelter services. ~ Activity 3 The City will explore a variety of methods to increase the supply of affordable housing for low- and moderate-income families. The City will: . Consider participating in a South King County regional entity to address housing needs. . Assess the value of pooling technical resources between jurisdictions to assist in the development and implementation of housing policies and programs. . Look at the benefits of collaborative efforts to coordinate local government money and resources in a way that will attract greater private and not-for-profit investment into affordable housing. . Consider funding homeownership programs such as down payment assistance, sweat equity, homebuyer education, community land trust or those that reduce development costs or reduce mortgages. i: \bgg enral\bgstrats. doc Four-Year Strategies Page 4 of 5 Strategy #2 Prioritize and fund projects that strengthen the City's infrastructure and stimulate economic development. Fifteen percent (15%) of the annual CDBG allocation will be targeted toward projects categorized under this strategy. ~ Activity 1 The City will seek opportunities for public funding of capital facilities, services and infrastructure by working with the Human Services Commission, and soliciting input from the Management Team. ~ Activity 2 The City will consider funding public and community facilities improvement projects which address safety and accessibility issues particularly for the well-being of youth, elderly, and disabled persons. ~ Activity 3 The City will consider funding projects which encourage community development activities such as job creation, downtown and neighborhood revitalization, and those activities consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Human Services Comprehensive Plan. ~ Activity 4 The City will consider funding capital transportation improvement projects which connect low- and moderate-income housing areas with vital services in the City. Strategy #3 Address human services needs which focus upon self-support systems that empower families and communities to make contributions to their own well-being and enhance the quality of their lives. Provide technical assistance, planning and administrative services to increase performance levels of CDBG program participants. ~ Activity I The City recognizes that problems faced by children and their families are complex in nature and can result in dysfunction and tragedy ifnot addressed holistically. Solutions to complex problems often require a variety of interactive approaches designed to create environments which provide people with the tools to help themselves. The City will fund projects and agencies with a holistic approach to service delivery and demonstrate the ability to leverage funds and network with other service providers. i: \bggenral\bgstrats. doc Four-Year Strategies Page 5 of 5 ~ Activity 2 The social environment for youth is often volatile and filled with life-threatening circumstances. Collective efforts between local community organizations, the School District, and the City, may provide effective solutions that positively impact the young people in Federal Way. The City will consider funding projects which provide "at-risk" youth with more recreational and educational alternatives. The City will fund projects and public service agencies which assist families with children in the areas of employment and youth services. ~ Activity 3 The City will participate in regional and local planning activities with King County, the South King County Community Network Board, and other funders and jurisdictions to coordinate funding approaches, policies and service delivery which facilitate a continuum of care for people. ~ Activity 4 Planning and administration funds will be used to administer the City's CDBG program and when additional planning funds are available, special planning projects will be considered. i: \bgg enral\bgstrats. doc ~~~M#~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ...................................... ......... ................................. ................... ..-.....................-..........-.........-....-................-.......................-.... ..............-..-----....-...........-.- """"""'-""""""""""""""""-""""'" SUBJECT: School Impact FeelFacilities Plan CATEGORY: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ......... ............................................... ........................... """""""""""""'-"""""" .............-.......-....................-......-............-....-......--.........-..... .............-.....-........-.................--.......... ..... ATTACHMENTS: Memo to LUTC and Federal Way Public Schools 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan ..............................................................................."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'-""""'-""""'""""""-"""""""""-"""""""""""""'--""""'""""""""""".............-......... .................................................... SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City's school impact fee ordinance requires the Federal Way School District (District) to annually update its capital facilities plan and the impact fee calculation. This is the regular annual plan and fee update with the proposed fee to be effective January I, 200 I. The District understands that the new fee is subject to 1-695 and the new fee will only be put in place if the initiative is detennined to be unconstitutional. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................-..................... ':ITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: LUTC recommends the facilities plan and the proposed 2001 fee be forwarded for full council approval with implementation of the new fee subject to the State Supreme Court's decision ofI-695. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................... CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the facilities plan and the proposed 2001 fee with implementation of the new fee subject to the State Supreme Court's decision ofI-695. -~~¿;-~-~~~~~----- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # document2 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Subject: August 1,2000 Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee David H. MOS~anager . \ - Iwen Wang, Management Services Director PJJ Federal Way Public Schools 1999/2000 Capital Facilities Plan/School Impact Fee Date: To: Via: From: The City has received an updated copy of the Federal Way Public Schools' (FWPS) 1999/2000 Capital Facilities Plan with the proposed school impact fees for the City's annual review. The Capital Facilities Plan contains the consistent but more detailed infonnation related to capacity and the calculation of the proposed school impact fee increase. The new fees, to be effective January 1,2001 are $2,710 per single-family dwelling unit and $830 per multi-family dwelling unit. This is a $327 or 13.7% increase for single family, and $44 or 5.6% increase for multi-family units from the 2000 level. The increase in impact fees is primarily attributable to the absence of State matching funds for the proposed $18 million (land and construction) new middle school. The State uses a per student square foot rate that is lower than the program space actually used in the Federal Way Public Schools in determining available facility capacity. Based on the state's calculation, copy attached, the FWPS is over-housed at the elementary and middle school levels; therefore the proposed new middle school is not eligible for the state match. If eligible, the State match would result in lowering the impact fee by $518 per single-family unit and $83 per multi-family unit. The City's School Impact Fee Ordinance recognizes that local needs are most logically detennined locally, and define the space requirement in the Design Standard as "space required, by grade span and taking into account the requirements of students with special needs, which is needed in order to fulfill the education al goals ofthe District as identified in the district's capital facilities plan." Based on the Capital Facilities Plan submitted, FWPS projects a capacity deficit of 650 students at the middle school level by 2002. In addition to the above, this year's calculation also indicates a significantly higher student generation factor for senior high students, which means more high school students per family in the sample population. However, this increase is offset by a reduction in the projected construction cost for the proposed new high school. With the status of 1-695 yet to be determined, FWPS understands that Council's approval of the proposed fee increase will be subject to the outcome of the supreme court decision, and that if Initiative 695 is upheld by the Supreme Court, the increase will not take place and the 2000 fee will continue. Attachments: 1. August 1, 2000 letter from FWPS explaining the state matching fund eligibility, with the eligibility calculation from the State Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction. 2. Federal Way School District 1999/2000 Capital Facilities Plan. Committee Recommendation: Forward the draft Federal Way School District 1999/2000 Capital Facilities Plan and proposed impact fee to full Council approval with implementation of the proposed fee súbject to the State Supreme Court's decision on 1-695. K:\FINANCE\COUNCIL\SCHIMP AC\OOSCHOOL IMPACT FEE.DOC AUG-01-2ØØØ 09:20 F.W.S.D.-FINANCE ~y ~DERALf WAY .:;;;-- 253 941 0442 P.02/04 f'IIHII':. :,(HO')l~. August 1,2000 Ms. ¡wen Wang Finance Director City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA98003 Dear Ms. Wang: As you know, the Federal Way Public Schools has submitted its 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan to the City of Federal Way. The District has requested that the City adopt the Plan by reference in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The District's Plan identifies the construction of a new middle school scheduled to open the fall of2005. The voters of the District approved a bond measure for $83 million on September 14, 1999. This bond measure included funding for the new middle school which is projected to serve 800 students. The District's standard of service is 25 students for the average class size for grades 7 to 12. Even though the District's enrollment projections and student capacity indicate the need for the new middle school, the State of Washington's funding formula does not recognize this need. Enclosed please find the worksheet prepared by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (UOspr'). Based on the aSPI analysis, the District has square footage in excess of the state match formula and is allegedly overhoused. However, it is well recognized that the state match process is simply a funding allocation fonnula to distribute limited .resources. The aSPI fonnula does not correspond to the facility standards of most districts throughout the State and does not capture the need for school facilities and for additional student capacity. As stated in the December 1999 Report of the Task Force on School Construction Financing [State House of Representatives]: Recommendation #2: Restore the state standard fot construction cost per square foot and space per student The Task Force recommends that the State Board of Education give priority to begin restoring the level of state support per square foot of school construction Phone (253)-945,2000 . 31405 18th Avenue South. Federal Way, WA 98003,5433 . www.fwsd-w~dnè:t-c:du A..G-Ø1-2ØØØ 09:21 Ms. Iwen Wang August l~ 2000 Page 2 F.W.S.D.-FINANCE 253 941 0442 P.03/04 and the space per student allocation to the pre-1985 level. The Board, by administrative rule. establishes the factors that determine the amount of state financial assistance for school construction. During the early 1980's, the demand for state funds exceeded available revenues. In order to spread the available dollars to more school projects. the Board reduced the state allocation:- per square foot and the standard for space per student. Actual experience with constructing new school buildings in this state exceed the current state standard space allocation. The trend for more space is expected to continue as school buildings are expected to meet the increasing requirements for teclmology and program activities. Current Standard Pre-1985 Standard National Standard K-6 80 Sq. Ft. per student 7-8 110 Sq. Ft. per student 9-12 120 Sq. Ft. per student Hdcp 140 Sq. Ft. per student 90 Sq. Ft. per student 130 Sq. Ft. per student 130 Sq. Ft. per student 150 Sq. Ft. per student 119 Sq Ft. per student 146 Sq Ft. per student 185 Sq Ft. per student The Task Force recommends that the State Board of Education use its rule making authority to implement a change to the cost per square foot and the square foot per student allocations subject to additional funding being made available by the Legislature. Under the current square footage standard, it appears that districts such as the Federal Way Public Schools do not meet the eligibility requirements set forth in the state match process. (See enclosure) Thus~ this District, like many other school districts in King County, no longer qualifies for state match.iD.g funds at some or all the grade levels. If you have any questions, please call. Thank you. S~.f~ Jeñ Carlson Manager of Budget and Planning Enclosure AUG-01-2000 09:21 F.W.S.D.-FlNANCE 253 941 0442 P.04/Ø4 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DTSTRTÇTNO 210~ KlNG~UNTY New H19:h Schoo) Decatur High Addition Feder&] Wa.y HigJ1 Addirion ThO!Da& Jefferson Hi2h Addition . Imman Hi~h Rq)1acement (Nf[.) -ð.!i6L YSTS OF EXISTING FACTI..TTIES Gr.we Class- Sq. Ft. Capacity Level looms Area Total Net Oct. 1. 1999 ENROLLMENT ŒlEADCOlJNT) Projections 0 No. Unhoused 2004 - 2005 2004 - 2005 -- -- ::1-- K-S 377 985,636 12.320 9,722 9,483 (2.837) lldcp. 32 53,760 384 275 297 (81) Total 1.039,396 12,704 9,997 9,780 (2.924) 6-8 222 575,066 5,751 5,05& 5,524 (227) Hdcp. 12 20,160 144 131 173 29 Total 595,226 5,895 5,189 5.697 (198) 9-12 170 544,879 4.541 .6,252 7,001 2.460 Hdcp. 14 23,520 168 253 219 51 Total 568.399 4,709 6.505 7,220 2.511 Disuict Totals 23,308 21,691 22.697 (611) 3.04% FLTG m IT JTY C~A TTON: K-S @ 80 sf 758,640 9-12 @ 120 51 840.120 6-8 @ 100 sf 552,400 Hdcp. 30.240 18 Hdcp. 39 65,520 870,360 @ 140 @ 140 1,376,560 (568,399) Less 9-12 inventory (1,039,396) Less K-S inveT1tory 301,961 sq. ft. unhouscd (595.226) Less 6-8 inventory (258,062) sq. ft. ovcrl1oused \ ~ .1 t:/1o .. TnT"" n...." ~ ~]/ FEDERALf WAY .:;;-- ,'I -\ \',\\f,i, (It! i, h "ri-^'- ( if:',)" \ - PUBLIC SCHOOLS w \A \\» NJl, CD rl1 t *lJ;'J ~cO - J,1' ~\t(úl s '\ÚJ'\w.rJ-. D\/Jcl ..{l) L"t~"7 { ! June 26, 2000 ,', c.Ú¡'¿lJ J"'~ \"J 1'1/1;\,)1 ,,'. ¡,¡; ; , i -::3: (\}{i\'\ Iwen Wang City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way W A 98003 Dear Ms, Wang, Enclosed is a draft of the Federal Way School District 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan. The King County School Technical Review Committee has reviewed this plan and will recommend its adoption to the King County Council. Please review this document for submission to the appropriate committee at the City of Federal Way. I am available to meet with you to discuss the plan. You can reach me by phone at (253) 945-2071 or email at gwalker@fwsd.wednetedu, I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, $¿jv<,- ¿¡J~ Geri Walker MIS Specialist Phone (253) 945-2000 . 31405 18th Avenue South. Federal Way, WA 98003-5433 . www.fwsd.wednet.edu FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF EDUCATION Audrey Germanis Linda Hendrickson Holly Isaman Ann Murphy Jim Storvick SUPERINTENDENT Thomas R. Murphy FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS T ABŒ OF CON'fENTS........................................ INTRODUCTION ,.... ....,......... ....... ....:.... ....., ......... 11 iii-v SECfION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction........ ...... ...... ....... ..... ......................... ".. Inventory of Educational Facilities............................. Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities.................... Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities.......................... Needs Forecast - New Facilities.............................. Six Year Finance Plan.............................................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 SECfION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction...................... ..................,.................... Map - Elementary Boundaries.................... Map - Junior High Boundaries............,....... Map - Senior High Boundaries................... 7 8 9 10 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction........................ ..... ....,........................... B ui Iding Capacities.. .,.. ...."............. .....,.................... Portable I..ocations........................ ........... ................ Student Forecast.................. ....................,.............. Capacity Summaries.... .................. ........................... King County Impact Fee Calculations....................... 11 12-13 14-15 16-18 19-23 24-26 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1998/99 PLAN 27-29 ii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991», and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 2IA, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. ~5-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2000. This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Auburn and City of Des Moines have not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies. Additional plans will be consistent with the six year Capital Facilities Plan. iii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION (continued) On October 12, 1998 the Board of Education approved a recommendation to move to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2002 or as additional high school space allows. Tþis grade configuration is believed to be more responsive to student needs. It will aÎlow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes. The middle school allows two-year preparation for the W A State ih grade test, matches the Federal Way Public Schools 8th grade gateway test, and matches most western Washington districts. Middle schools are also thought to be a better way to address the needs of adolescence in a period of transition from elementary to school to high school. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation credit system, allows two-year preparation from the 10th grade test, and physically places the high school students together. Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community population. The District must be flexible with building, programs and staffing to meet the needs of the 21 5t Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current tax rates. A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs with no increase in local tax rates. Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of $83 million on May 18, 1999. This bond will provide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17 million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million). Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music equipment, infonnation systems and networks and emergency communications. Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year. This program currently serves approximately 710 students, 487 are full time students. Internet Academy has grown from about 60 students to the current 700 in three years. The forecast for growth in this program is to serve approximately 750 full time students by the year 2005. Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administrative areas and a computer lab area. Additionally, some lab sections are scheduled in the current high school facilities during non-school hours. There is an anticipated need of approximately 2000 square feet of additional space over the next two years. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance learners". lV FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The Marketing Academy School operated in Federal Way for two years from 1997 to 1999. As the District evaluated this program, it was detennined that the program was not meeting the needs of students in the most effective manner. The Marketing Academy School has not operated this year and there are no plans to start the program in the near future. Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the Illahee Junior High site. The school served 120 seventh and eigth grade students this year and will serve 180 - 210 students in grades seven, eight and nine in the 200012001 school year. One additional single wide and one double wide portable will be moved to the site during the summer of 2000. v FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and update modernization needs listed. 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Avenue SW Fed~ral Way 98023 Green-Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Feder~l Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35675 32nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th Street Federal Way 98003 Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Avenue S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003 Woodmont 26454 16th Avenue S. Des Moines 98198 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Academy 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 lllahee 36001 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th Street Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023 Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Harry S Truman High School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 LEASED SPACE Internet Academy 32020 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 2 .oJ 35 40 63 71 72 84 85 96 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal W.ay 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003 Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003 Leased Space Community Resource Center 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003 Security Offices 30819 14th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # I Location 27th Avenue SW & Dash Point Road SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S E of 10th Avenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 314th Place S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S 36600 block of Pacific Highway S 3737 S 360th Street 16th Ave Sand S 364th Way S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. 1 There is a pending sale on this property. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Truman High School Modernization with expansion (1) - Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity (1) Portables Decatur High School, Federal Expansion (1) Way High School and Thomas Jefferson High School Various School Sites Parking Safety; Network (2) Upgrades; Automated Libraries; Elementary Playgrounds; High School Sports Fields; Emergency Communications. Notes: (1) Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non-voted debt issues. (2) Anticipated source of funds is future bond issues. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTI CIP A TED SOURCE OF FUNDS New Senior High School Site 85( 1) (2) New Middle School Unknown (2) - Notes: (1) Site 85 is the designation for the new senior high school This site, purchased in 2000 is located at 16th Ave Sand S 364th Way (District maps will be updated to reflect location). (2)Anticipated source of funds is state matching funds, Impact Fees, future bond issues and/or non-voted debt issues. . .-. 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Revenue Impact Fees (I) $250,000 $462,706 $250,000 S962,70~ Land Sale Funds (2) S5oo,OOO S750,OOO S573,215 S500.000 S2,323,21 Bond Funds (3) S9,OOO,OOO TOTAL S9,750,OOO SI,212,706 S823,215 S500,OOO - SO SO 512,285,921 Unsecured Funding Sources State Match Funds (5) . $7,000,00< Bond or Levy Funds (3) S74,OOO,OO( Land Fund Sales (6) S800,OO( Impact Fees (4) S 1,500,00< TOTAL S83,300,OOO NEW SCHOOLS 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Cost [New Middle School S2,OOO,OOO S3,OOO,OOO $12,000,000 $17,000,00< New Senior High School $1,700.000 $ IO,400,OOC $17,900,000 $ I 0,800,000 $40,800,OO( New Senior High School Site S3,200,OOO S3,200,OO( MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Truman Senior High (Alternative) S500,OOO $3,500,000 S2,Ooo,OOO S6,OOO,OOC Expansion Three High Schools $700,000 $6,800,000 S7,500,OOC Expansion Elementary Schools SIOO,OOO SI,500,Ooo SI,6OO.l'n,., TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables (7) S362,245 $241,497 $603,74 OTHER Safety Improvements (8a) SI,400,OOO $ 1,600,000 $3,OOO,OO( School Improvements (8b) S1,800,OOO SI,3oo,OOO $300,000 $600,000 $4,OOO,OOC Facilities Department S250,OOO $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $I,5oo,OOC TOTAL S9,912,245 523,850,000 520,691,497 513,750,000 54,750,000 S12,250,OOO 585,203,74 NOTES: 1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. 2. These funds come from various sales of land and are set aside for estimated expenditures. 3. These funds will be used for future projects. 4. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next six years. 5. These funds are projected state matching funds. 6. These funds are projected land sale income. 7. These fees represent the cost of moving and siting existing portables and purchasing new portables. The District may choose to purchase new portables in the years ShO\\l1. This estimate may also include the cost of purchasing these portables. 8a. These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity. These projects in!cude parking and pedestrian safety improvements at 15 elementary schools. 8b. These projects have been approved by the Board of Directors and cover most schools. These projects do not increase capacity. These projects include: school networks, information and library systems; new classroom stan up; elementary playgrounds and high school sports fields; music equipment; emergency communication. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades K-6), seven junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and "two alternative schools (grades 7-12) for the 1999/00 school year. On April 20, 1996 the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted the boundaries for these schools. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school for each grade level (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPnAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES E F -- --- G I H -_u- U_'\--_U_~~9<..._L~~~¡'\i:í.;.:;;:~~;.)~\" \~---.---_--m~~_l.-..----:~~-.: . ~"'~. 1,,=::3 : \ - .m' II >-- - I ", ' . 1 : ,,- - '- I!o~ 1.~~ -- K.-" :1 "-~: "'" ~'l3;,&""~;: 'lIMENTARY SCHOO<.S J"Hto!! HIGH SCtiOO<.S .- L~:. - . ~ -~;:: ~ :~ LC- - i . ~'-'-;¡,~F'¡~""¡'¡¡¡::,-_! f~ C~ -- . Code " . I :- :11 å II Im~ '~~ - ..:J ,... ! ft . :'i,' ri" ~: .,.: 10 Adelaide CoG '" lIIahee E-$ ¡ - ~~ ~l ].:. ~' - ~ ; :- '~:~' 16 Brigadoon B-3 66 Kilo GoG 2 'I t::,:.lI.I' TI :-- .Q;:; r1 ~ :.:' 1\ ~ ~;- - :,i.,¿ : 2 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D~ ,-'-~ ¡ :¡;t-~~~ -, ~ /'. 22 Enterprise D-9 61 Sacajawea E-5 -=""'~,~~¡"',~ .';"""":":.'1 '.JIr~:' ~I' ~'- ': 14 Green Gables A-7 70 Sagh-alie C-3'" .. " . , ,: 30 LakeDoIIO,ff GoG 65 Totem G-3 ;;~'~""If~-: ,.::,;; .1.., ¡ flJ"'; ; ::~ ' ¡ '\ I' : 11 Lake Grove DoG 8 Merit F~ IIJ ~.... ..", -,,:,,~ :'I,~' - , ' ~ j : 33 Lakeland F-9 ~--'~"'~,;':"- JI.--i¡; ,¡! :::"'-'~'V!I~--: 2 MarUwain F-4 o::~~,' ;'._,tl::'~ " ,..' ""'I' 'þ Ai : 29 Meredith Hili H-5 SENIOR HI,GH SCHOOLS J ;""-;40' Ii, ,- If!! u" .;;¡,~, "" ~ J 1',;; ~ ¡ J 6 Mirror Lake E~ '"""",' _n- -'!L..'" / .,-.- :" ~, 5 Nautilus E-5 Code -- . I ,:... ;I'IJ'. ~ ' .. 'II"; ,- ~ ".' ~ ¡ 15 Olympic VHlW C-7 ~" ' ~:l -, ',.' 21 Panther Lake E-3 80 Decatur CoG ' p'/ .-- ~ j ! ~ .:_~ - ,._~--:-' , ! : 37 RalnlerVtew F.10 81 - Federal Way E-5 .. --;], r ¡ il,~ r.,. -, ~ It,' . 41 Sherwood Forest D-3 83 Thomas Jefferson G-4 f- -.000.- ,:r. ..1f1. - It ..,;¡¡ ~ .." ,I -, '\'\¡ g- 24 Sliver Lake 0-7 8 Hal'T'f S. TNman FoG ...C" ~'# t~~'!I! ' 'li1'..:1~ -.h!..~, ~ 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F~ ; J . '-~'4?~I~"- ~~. , 25 su~nycrest G-2 > i. ..~Ä" -:'! " , -, .~~L21':;! "~'--- ~ 13 Twin Lakes BoG 4 ,'~ ..~.. '~~~".I!t4 ..'~~ '! , j)~;,\ ~\: - 27 Valhalla G-4 Future School Sites - ~ .- , ¡,:'. ,.'1>] ;, " ';-:': 2 ,.:.' ,.JJ"" : 4- 7 WildWOOd. F-5 Surplus Sites - ':::::: - j,~ .....:t ~ ~¡¡"I'~' U¡ 1 Woodmont F-3 ...' ,A' ¡ 'i'J(~, , 100 EducatJonalServiceCenter FoG . "i, ~ .~ \;;-¡:' ,~'îit." -~'~:,.... . 99 Future Support Services ' E-3 -= Code-- . 1¿j1\~ft... ~,..~;: ,... , ¡~'~!I ¡ 'lIe... .:p~:Jj. 97 Maintenance-OperatJons-TransportatJon EoG ~-::..~, I' -, "~í)'"' : ~ 11;- r I ,.1 ..~ '1~,~'~- -, -~.: " "'.:"3it:. Pari<s- -,', D . '~-" '-><,,~ ':ë.::\:' ....~ - II' 11 ,-" ~. '- ',.', ,".'iIIk -",.- o. ".....-.~.,' j ...- '!\õ:æ":~UJ . ~ "" . t" - II " ~ .~.. . 1 A I 8 Ie": . --~,';.; fA ~ - ~ ~,~ ~ ~.-;;:. - ~ ~ :(ft=ii:l!)r ~ . ~~,.. j.FEDERALWAY'WASHINGTON.ndVICïAtN'T~J~ <:-.."~r1ft~..(t.,;¡,.- -:_"~,- ,.:1' ~". n,', 'I."~" ~~ ~I I 1 '~I' """""ÈJ~;l:~~ ~- '<>'-1";-" ""-. ," ~';;;;;" ; D.oD ":::,".i,'-:'aJ".¡L"-~"- ~ ~:'~'- :,... :~:~~'fh~"' 1,'-. ,"r ~,~~- , s -:ro-"'",.,:' ,.-. -~".. -, .-;,~-- ,"- ,.' . .3 ~i "Ir-i -.-' ,~;¡:. --.~'. _.1;:',' .,' -,,'- ..: &,--- : '" --- '.-.ta--" -,;" '--"'0::-::-' -¡--~," ,', ~-'-' ; ..__::!!tt...,...,~ .,,',,;¡";,I_- B :;:OA ',' J:':H ~~ f~>, ~¡,¡: It t~\~¡~,;<;;': . .:~, ' ,: ,I~~~:J ,. , A " ,~~ -.=; /7- - ~ . .. - - ~ - ;,~ - ':": "', 1, "----ri'~- " --' - .! 1\"..,-wit-, ......... -:'AiIi' -. .-. ;.:;- . . , " . , - ,.. .- : I~ "~ r ~ -', ',~~ -"........ :.' " \' ,n_' ~'1:'_,';:' ,. .. j,&ií€: ~~! t -'it-- 6 ... ~.'b/( , ~ u ~.~~- ;1 fJ.: --.., .W' ~m,. J:I""=- .~,}'\,'::::,r.- ".'W,.,:~.."... :;'7-~~.I-i .,¡j:U,I""",,:,:' -, :"'".,..,r~r ! -,\., ,. '-'" ..,... ',',"_" - ., " ", . EfI- "',.' ,'" ,'- -'.'*"'" .',,""'~~""Y7~" ~~-'}¡¡¡:¡ ¡~ ... -'.. '.=~'" 6 , . ",-", ...- Ji~ ,'.'.' I':~ - I'M <f ¡ ';lIfU . '-'- ',!,I:..:--- 'f.':;';" .". ' =.-'ft?'~~~ :..-..' """:---' ~ '~". ~ ,~- - - ~B' , - ' " t_: " ' ;, ~( 'r< .- 4}' ¡ .f' ::.:: ! ';;¡i i ¡j ..,. s. ' ~ ~ '~--,'~'.I'" ..:::--",,-_.- --::-_111:- '" - -Ie."" 11 '-_._1-, :':-:'!I~:""~-~ ,- --,'!f;f"'!"/i~-r: f",~_'i ~l ~-~J., -"-.~ f' :::fŒ~\ '\ I 'ft ~ "~i'! A ;~¡r:;(1 .,.~ ~ ' 1 '-. '" -r-.'- ~ ~: <f. ._~ "';... \ " :.:. .: ¡ . IIJ ~ - ~ .;s'II - - "- -. '" -s < '\ .~> :a:~;t;t, ._H~' ,_. . \.1 i l ~~~:lI1,,:!! ,I. - -:~, :r ~v~'" J-\J~,- e-~ ~" ,~,'" ~ ,¡~:.¡H " ,,'-' ~.~;. \ :\.,:\' :¡... fJ, , ' :.:,~ "- '..' .-';, ~". ,;¡i {)'i1.~;~-" "'::::'- ; ~~..,..~', -¡..;, , '0;.. ~'I'-"'.- I ,f.. -_.~' ~:~: ,.,' , . ,', ;1;;'..: ' -'Ii - . ~Ti ,- '~"': ~ -.... i=~. ~ ~~~. n,-,-. ---:~';" i - .... '1.: ,¡" "--~,,.:/.~. ,- ...J!." , Ill" ,ii" .,.-- ',: ,'--',' ..j:¡¡J; ,-'"",,',4'.'.1; : ,'" 1~,- ..~-', ,- ~..","'~':;' ~"'" ",,-- - //" '-., ~'" ct,- ',:" sw ... ~ 1;.(" .ÿ~~r.. ~ if. \.,. !:J.. . ._~, '~":",~,,. (..1-0 I --. I Y.~ ~ - .. -',' '- -- CD... "iJ -~~~'o~qV-.'- ~I'Ø' ~,::,~~..:' II ~. I~ " ~ :8":'~ w.........,.::....:..,;.: """,..-.- . N . sw';;"':' ... -" - . -,- :; .'" ,~I_-,:, .. , t;:. .- E ..."..",--..- '(;!ig';¡ z ! I .- ~~.:.,~' ,., ~ ~,-~::.::Y};;ÿ ~ j ~ ~ ."00_"'" ..J-,::r;", ' ',; ; , Ro, ~ -. - I I. ..~"Iöi;.~ ~ '-.J - ~ a~'4 "".-'0"- ~';\ t ú,8 WEB """~ "'. < .. . --' -; .. '"," . '!. ~ (, ... ; f I - .~.. ~~.<1'J.. ~I'è J. \ ; , 1 w.III ,- '" ~ t ~. :1 ./ ~r' ...... ,~,~/~ 1"'::-'" ;. ~-- l : jl:{¡' ' ...... I ~ - : . " '- fIT; '..1. i.....; '<.". ,;-- '.:::,;;,- '?:, - N. {;J.. . ;"'. -;,, . "--.. : : Ii ' '!:~ ['T , .~;. ~ J~jf 1~,. 'M, S . . . ,!~. 22 . = ;: .:!L!:. .: I.:. ,~. /: I ~ ' ,-- ~ 1- ...... . "", I' .! - .., - . J1"~",'h - , , ; ruxTecu<>, -- """1,R ~', ..--; "". ..~" ~, ji ~.~ ¡ . 'ji'-~J'r':. J fi, ..-- w... .. " 7,,~' ~ .. _.,u"........ " -, PI .. " ,'1:tT>r ~ L :--~'."" "")I ';I -"'-~å.. .. I ---. "J' JI'" II... .., . (;:'1,=1 ~~. \. : t' I. - '--~ -:;:-...:~~":-' N ~:..<. , ~þ~' .:..:' :'. Os .... ~.- l~;" . ..', ; j ,';:.19 '9 - ¡",. - . ,ti:ii "'" -. I .........-.- I ~I !" .~,. ='. ~\[ ~ .';'~ - -"-:§I , ;:0.<'0 : ., :, ' '" 'F\:,>.~ý- 0;; ;; Ti.: .=: " 1[..' .*":-.,,,", ; - - "', -"."'~'-';...'~!",. '~~~f; <,~-~,.:~,,_~~]I,,_:, ' ~" , --. .. ~ .. ¥ .. ~ - . !'t ... ...- ~'- ' . ¡ ~' ~- 'Y'.~~. " ¡ ,,}' " : ~, , ~ï. ~ m ~-;I :1 ..'~' .-;~ ~~ I,~' .; l' ,,~. : '::::: ò~ ~I~ ..W.. ~.. !.." ~. :,- 17. - , ,. .,. -, -.-'-. FEDERAL r,t3¡; ':':~.' ~<F.~'~~; -- ~;.~ ~_:~.~~-"~ i ..~f I !~,_....~ .' \V1A'Y ~ ¡ ~ ~ =.... ...Fl -. ,J. F-...... W"- .;...--- ~ 10 '-~~/" " ',~' . .~¡:: ~ !I to . ' . ,$' . ,i ~ ,. 1:1'1'1"'_-'011:1'1'1"1 ~ - ~ Ì\ ~ ,. ...J, ~ .. :¡ ¡ ~ , 9;:1 D, : '.! "UON" .,;-,'ü'. """"I.CHocK- (253) 945-2000 L!! «... cl-l.,] ~¡ T.... .:...- ..__.__.....M"'UM I ,;.;..~"'" _.~~~- """,Wq.W'- 11 E F G -r ...... H FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPnAL FACILITIES PLAN Junior High School Boundaries . . E F -- -- G .l H '~--' "'\~---~~ :~:;~:.~~'I~:~ í~:-~,:~:~h---__~~..'h':~:-. 1, ,\ ::=P1:1 ~ !r'i!l; -4:- -', 'I : z-.ç~:..' , ,-_: '-':"~:-, J ~~ ~ ::' .c " L. coo... . Code-- . ¡ :_1\1 _: ~:I n~,ll:~- M ¡ .'~.~~:- /~,. ¡ 10 Adelaide C~ 6-C lIIahee E-9 :~~ R ij;:æ:¡ m, ~ ¡, ':0,: .~_: 16 Brfgadoon B-8 66 Kilo ~ Z . ;I!~:'" -; --==--k':~ r; ~ ..: \,]p.j,;,~, .1.-,&: Z 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D~ :L. ,,- . -,_Jt!F'.¡:ç,)~' " ~ .c 22 Enterprise 0-9 61 Sacajawea E,5 -= ""r:-,',~;i"', ;-~I~'" '-;1 i ' ' ~...-: 14 Green Gables A,7 70 Saghalle C-8 ' , " :' ,': . I ,": 30 Lake Dolloff G~ 65 Tolem G.3 ~' ~_"'.i Jr- :..., ~.:.~ ,-, ¡ ': : :',:' ~}; .: 11 Lake Grove D~ 8 Merit F~ ~ t~.... p"" --. ~ ." - - , ' ..., ' ----' ._.-::~ -- ,.. - - s. ' 33 Lakeland F-9 ;"i ~, . ¡. 4 ;!1' ¡¡I :::'; 'II I : 2 Mari<~wal~ F~ 1,7,:'<,¡j~I' _.#J ::~" .. '.-:1. 'j~! i 29 Meredith Hili H.5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 3 . ~ -;,": "/~ v.~ -: ," ..'. ~ f( f.if : 3 6 Mirror Lake E~ '"""" .:' - u, ...... r '.:..,;' . : 5 Nautilus E-5 Code.. . t -' ...' , :"1; .. "; ""~' ¡ ~~ ~~u:::~ ~~: ~~ 80 Decatur C~ ,~, ~ ~~~. ! J,..:,: J '- ~j I' ~:; 37 Rainier VIew F.10 81' Federal Way E.5 '..,.~.f ~ J f '~ : ¡ ,:;-~I.:I:I'Ð; 'r: ~ 't.- 41 S~efWOOdFo.....t D'¡ 83 ThomasJefferson G~ ---'" ~ ~...1Jl . .,~ luiii 1"Î ..~I~ d,' ,:\};:bt \~ - 24 Sliver Lake 007 8 Harry S, Truman F~ 'uc. ~,' t. ,!! , ' iL',' :"~/I!i..' ~\ 26 Star Lake G-3 8 Merit F~ ; ,,= 0' '..~ ...::~'..,'Y-"" , 25 Sunnyc.....t G-2 > ì.,~ ,~. I~' , ~}-Î~ ¡! -~.... r+- ~~ ~:I~':akes ~~ FutureSchooISites-! 4 ,A:. .~~ '~~.~,.,,~~. ~.'-¡1:q:;',-.~~~:~ :~-¡ .~~~ ); 4 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites - :,:.:: 1j t '..' f": Ü. ',or ¡; : ,-, ): 1 Woodmont F-3 :::::.. ~'.:' :c~:~ 1~;1 ... ~ ',. : 100 EducalionalServiceCenter F~ . /.~i;>" 'fo."~ ...";" i';ji::',' -,: I~ ~ ,.; lCeo."" , 99 FutureSupportServices E'¡ = Code--8 .- ~,:..,;I~.. " ~... r,"" ".... ,", ... .:r~.:J), 97 Malntenance-Operalions-Transportalion E~ ~~ I', -~ , ' r~øJ"~ '. f~: ".' 11i1:- ~ I ~! " D - -- ;~~': ',13 I 'I'~I .' '¡p ~. '- Pari<s- .. --- ' HI..r..~~ ~~ ',.:...t r;;;'1 \, th' '11 ~ -, ~ _-:';U'-~;:t '--'I'" ~t \J,s s F~OER~L WAY, ~ASHING:ON .nd VI¿~NI . . f&t\ \~~¡f":ifr~;'~: ~ g ..¡; ~ ~"j;: -Mlf - ~ " -;~ ',r."" ,,'.,,~: .' ii ~¡I I .0 ,~-.-j). \I<'i'~-~~:~:1) '~~ i;~)~:'- '-:'~- ~'~1I¡f :-:.'. ;,' ~,7~' '~, y - ~', SO~ -,....~~:: ~1,~t~~~ -,,'~~i1;? ~rJ:-',fi:.~"I",:-~ '-~'r~~ ~,'~ ~~_"ìl"'i--!;"" a'~' ~,.~-'- : ~~ 3...'~ \ g::-::,:" _1òOI :;-:- ' JI,,!! '! ' """" -'.. .:i';¡¡'~";r;' = .'~. ~ , . I . 'I' : . .l.íIif~:, ,._~i~~~~~~'ft :~iiJ =~::d < :bt\~';;~~' ~ ,M ~~ ~~:~~:~: ".,:~ \. ~ :~:i~"; f""ri'" --).~ ¡ 6 '(>'.~'~.' _-:.~ ~""'~.J..,¡;'. ~"J- )\ ""is.;:;'" '::<I¡~!"-.."ß:'~~':!". Ji."'. ," " ~ I"""" fj, ".-,or"",,]'" '~',~ ~. " .. !\,;-,~ "';_~'--xi'~""'" ','!J ~~\~....<".. , .",>,,-,'." - "",,' ...' '-= 61 " -)'., .~"'l"'=i"~'" "to. 1iii;P"'-~ ~.~ - - L:.I . .. ~'f' - ¡ . i ¡ l"'" '=-=,,- , : . :. "'.; I;~':~', - ' .. "" A' '::~:;.~~":::-:- .. H;3-- ~ ..t::~:' : ::: - , ' ~. '.. ;.. ~ ¡ , ' ~ '...!..O!L.~ ! ""MT: H..:"";;;' ,~' ;:-.,' '~~ :f"'. ,.~ "'i1 .- ' . ::.:: !~¡ I..... \~ !" "-:~";:J'" .', "",,' -,~_l " . ~...~..I -,,' ,""'. ,"- ,....-. " <!"~ ' . -..., -, '. ---lre 'H',. - ,¡ A "~:~\~)¡~,,,.y2l.¡'- .",~~-.- "'..~-":', - ' " 'f(, ~':' Il-E.:Jf: . '.-:::; ,-- ~"- ' i~ "j 7 "-1 I .' --' ",., . ~'l" ' , - .' .r ,~' 11 .~~;....,II ~-' ~ l.... I" 7"= ..i'-:' u""æ.ll ~ -- , ' I-.'. " - ~ U'. ¡", ...,.~ .,..,,' 'r-' j ". --~'" -,. "I ': .ñf.'.'" ." .. ,'" -/: .. ..:~~ ~-:.~;' I~,-. ........L~ 7 ," ~." ":;':rn,"""; "fi"" ," "'~;:" ' ;:)fwI:--¡fN}~ " ~-.- r '~~:~':'~:~;Al ~ ~:~'.i:;\! ..~~~~..~td~l: i." ,~.. : /'.'~~~':::,;~¿#,~~o~~ ll):-if rl:I'"-~?'. N . B,,":! !' ~~ --. ..~it'- ¥~ ~ '11,-:- ¡ ..."....,:'. .I!-:.,...l"'. r: : ..;;." ~ Ii!! ~' , ~. ---- J~I '.....",; '" ' J ' . """"""'/.. '", " . : ~ -' -.. --.' .~: ,u< ::::...-:::.... -' Jf ' ..... '.".... ~ ;" ~ 8 I ~ . -~:.:"..I '", ,,\ - ~ .Ii .....c",' :A, ,t':>'/,~ -"~'-=;¡ :-...1 ~ ..,~, ......1'~'1~'- AIU""-¡;¿- ::: '\( i' .i.-...' <:". ii";:-;;" ' P: . t r\~ - , .' "'. - ',' ¡ ~J#,;-. f ::, - "7 '~. .,-- "~i... ~: j::fj !~' " I ~~........ ~:.. '°- ::,=1\ '~~~;~~1-{1~J¡~ s 5~S' l ..'....;.~ ,~}::: '!~l ~ :, ~ii'~¡~" ' :~ -~'r":::- .;liIGli' ~~L'_' 'W'M.-" ;'. '-~Á ~+,::::t ' '! ~""".,,} ~~-'-:::ÏL. I ..:-;:.:'" H' .'t. r:." ~ ~I:'I::I!F I-' ......,.. ,.... -" ~~ 'U " . ;.1- ,.. ' 9 --,..-- '-IN ~:- ~,- =';j;iil. : i-"iii =;,. Co ~ ~.., - ::::¡ '", '-.II: 9 I --.- "-'_""'-! ,i~ -";r - '. l"""'i'\~. -"7.~ "", ~ : ~ :':. ,~,.I:-;" ~ --..>.~ :: :; ~: ':::~ ,,' :~..: - : , , , .. I 'I.:' ~"':...I,HI '. ".:; <. 'r;;t-. -~ -/of" :;, = _:. ' ~Y! ~,., ~~~!P7T '-~~'~~ =.~ ' ~ ~L :. ~ ,,~. : ~ D"~t:t:I~,.r, '... u. ~:' ::"1' ,.... ,. "-4- FEDERAL' !~~' . >7~~ -f ~ "1170"\1'::=.1). '~}k~ ' WAY ~ ¡ 10 -.. - ~ . UritPr" .~.:. -¡ ~ ¡ j¡ ~ ; 10 :~::~:loIoI~~ (253) 945-2000 ! fiff :~~= K7 ~. ,~ ... ~ ~ ¡ ~ ~~ ~. L :::...-::..:;;;"' II ,-, Ë""'" I F~"" G '~=-H DERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210 ElEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN Senior High School Boundaries u u- E \>RMOWtI ". F '"'::::...- ,~G 1. H :::~: SCHOO~~:::~~~~H:~ 210: u . .~~~: ~~~~~ ~ß' N coo...8 Co<M,,8 :,,:111. 1\ n~,M¡- 'IL,h!'~- I/. , 10 Adelaide C~ 6-4 l1Iah.. E-9 j..~ !L~.:~~' Tìl ~ p;: p,.:. "", J 16 Brijpdoon B-3 66 Kilo G~ 1 ,,1 ""'~~"~' - ft '-':¡:¡;;, 1 ..r: \.) "~' ~..-:;::: : 1 28 Camelot G-5 62 Lakota D~ :L: ",...!:" .:w.~~! Ij; ~ \... ~/'. 22 Enterprise 0-9 61 Sacajawea E,5 -= ,;; " ~:', . - " ; l i~' ' "'.-: 1. Green Gables A-7 70 Saghalie C-3 - . , ... ",: '. ,: 30 Lake Dolloff G~ 65 Totem G-3 . ,"~..., ~. :... ~~ J ,_. ~lft: :',1': ': 11 Lake Grove D~ 8 Merit F~ c:::::; ~::.~ -::, . -~ . - ..I.: 33 Lakeland F-9 ., ;~ If. . ¡. ,. ;:t::1: ¡ ,! :::', ':1 ¡ : 2 Maò< Twain F..- --, ::' ~.~' --.~::~ ".' ~ 'f¡~! ¡ 29 MeredithHIII H-5 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS J ! -;,,;: .. !/>I~" .. M..,,~ /~; : J 6 Mirror Lake E~ i""'" ; ;'/; .. :'-!L. <,' :-- ¡ . i ," : 5 Nautilus E-5 Code.- 8 .... - -':'. ~ : 15 OlymplcVoew C.7. ~ ~j ! :Ii_~. " . " : 21 Panther Lake E-3 80 Decatur C~ '.1",' ~ ~:- ~ :J!.-,' ,-1--:- :: ' 37 RainlerVoew F-10 81- FederalWay E-5 ~.. - : ¡I,. 'I~:; 2~ Stlwr Lake D.7 8 Hany S, Truman F~ .."... ..<--'ú... ,~ ;1 ..' lÜ'JI;-~b!..; ~ 26 Star Lake G.3 8 Merit F~ / ,,= fI". - ,~~ ;'.4?:.,. OP>'...~~'"\ ' 25 Sunnycrest G-2 > ~'j" 'j"..t "...... f" -, ~~~~~[t!:., ;T" ,...;x....-- ...J.... 13 TwinLakes B~ mil 4 " -'t" " ",\: "¡I.~H~' " '! ¡ ):r:r,~ \; 27 Valhalla G..- Future School Sites - 1/iiIi......,...... 1",'" .-' ~. "" "-:-11' ':. '. ._,'.1"'" ) :,. . 7 Wildwood F-5 Surplus Sites - ,:;:;:,. ! '"., ~; "';, : ,-, J :. ... 1 Woodmont F-3 :::.:..' . J" .. ~' , 100 Educational Service Center F~ ;;!I>/51,,\ ": ' . ,"! '~. '.-i:. .' -' : ".1 : ~ ; 99 Future Support Services E-3 :: Code-- . ...... W'~~~~ : ' ',¡"¿, ì~,"" ."" ¡ ¡ , !I ~ ,L-.. It "::.':!':J.I 97 Malntenanc.e~peratlOnS'Transportation E~ ~...., , '.: " ¡¡r;r ~~~ ,~¡...1~. ..' ~ oi\~ ~ ;;"--..:"ñ !!I ù 0,0'" ..__.~x¡..'.~, Hl,\r~"'t!';..¡óIiI' "¡ þ ",,~,~"- Parl<8-' ~. " ~ ':y~ :-,,~ '.\.._":'X ~il~~ -, ~"..~ -.-y ..~.I-' ~.-, 1 A I 8 I -.... k~1-:' :!.\ ~ -.:..d~áI ~" "1~~ : ~'~":riE'I';~ ~ i ~~,- )!.I , FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON .nd VlCìf¿NtT.. . ~~I ~'~fwr~:;h~ -,-_~r::' "~- ~~. ~~ -il\Il:"" :'~<~'l:"; cr.~~' ~J: 1:1 , I .NO ~-J": . ,-;'~- ~~~;I)~~~'~ ',-~ ~~" ~'t. '-:':,?- Q~~¡f '-~ ~'~~:.:~~~ ~ '- ~ ,.,", ,O~ !::""F~! :Jj~, _.-,"""';1'.;~.,~ --" ....' '~~ _..rI~~~~ ~~~.~..."~' ._'..' ::!"f'í.C'-';, ! I L ,..,.J/ .\!'i!~:.rm -A~.~~:!I ~~.':-.~'" -::~ ¿~.,~. '~r\.~W ~ I I ..oiII'"i.~~'- ~ ;'p ,. ." u ,~- J.n(!g~~ " . 'IX~'~'-'J ~ ---. f-Îf..:..-"';'~:: :.. ,~~¥~~ Ÿ--li-/~ .. "'. \:~.. ~i::- ~~.. ,~._.~-¡~ ~ ..'.. \, "-.~'.;'? ~ f" II~~ ~~ -~i .. ~ I~~ ~ ¿ :? ilw>& ,.." .'< ~ A "",-' ,0. I' ~,"'<Ì"J~-~ITI1r .-...;;..,.' ,~, " ~;.w~i~~ :'G' ~,: " ,. - cil~:;-' - ~ TW'~;' . H':' x '-;';1~p'~h .-. '-'\\. ,: i J 7 ~~1;¡~1'-', ,'~- ";'-~~"""" ~ 'ìk~" '-: "~~~--~~+' i ~~:":~~' , J ~~-.~._'\ ~~..~:_.rflii'ï.~ -- 1,.,"', -- .':,:"'.~~ "l;(;-':~':;.§'~H :=';.d~':.I~1 "\,.'..,. , ' 7 "'::~ ~m¡,' .' rn. ' : . ,.H .. .-. - ...J 1:jf ,~ - ~~"lrJ"'- ~:-w.u..,=~..~ j£:~.:.' =ì ',«..' ':". if, \... ,:'" r "'~W'~...".~' ,,+,0". t' --. '.-. .?"'. N ~. ~'Ÿ§ -;.;:' ", :. ~.._... ~,;:~~i"~:L, ¡ffi,-'- ¡u;>' :~~. . ~~. I , - - ,. - '. c~;;:... ~-: ,,/"'" ...'.......,. . !:!,'. . ¡ .. '~'.' fF!I i ~ .- . 1--'" . .".;.", L-:¡"'..,"iI' "\..J J' """""""/.. "ò'~'. : §; 8 W ~ E ,- "',,' ~~:::~;.,,~~~!;J ~ j â /", ." .:A~'~~t~~:lt'~ II ~- ~..I¡ ~ _.; I ~.~ J!. :~~. \.-' ~I.;.....t:-' '/ +1 :¡,...,'¡ ~.~~':::';""'-' .- I S ,1. . "-". -,-~. : ..;;;-~ :' :!,~ ~ ;I '!,~['f' ;.~~; j;:::::¡I.~.. - '. ~~ ......~--.... "d~H:1, [:';~'¡ .If-~ n"t: "SðSt / ! ,_:~~i! i ~ Ii T.~ ,.? '~t: ......- .. w...: It . ., "" . ~ _..,-- '"1 --::-'-"=":.- > N':¡:-ffr1~. ¡;.¡;~~"'¡'.~ .. 'M' ~... ' - . " ; ,..;-., .;9 --.- " iii 1:" -. " .,'.:;.. <~;~.. .2!:.IJ :I~I-.- ~"::§ ~ . . . ., ~ '~~,.J~~~,,"'!/~ F\~'<~r-: fJ~. ~':'.' ~i/A;t.~f~~~,~jj ~; -~.- ~ ~"~~~~., ~:.;~~iéf/ ~ ,',~j~~>...:~¡:~-~'.' :~:, <~~~ .¡ .;, ~ ,~~' r- ':::: o.~ -1 il', ,'" g... :~ .-. J ,.. . ,. .~- FEDERAL r~~ 't ..... - >,;r,~~~ -.'" / ~~'\I:=:~ J +t ~ê¡I ~k.'"~ \V'AY .:::::::- ~ 10 ~ ~/~ ..~ .. ItIfI'" ',; ... ~,~' . .--:j~ '- ~ ",10 Wi : ~ 0'.1 ..e-< ...i'.' ~ ", 1:11.:...1-.....:1.1....1 ! ~ "" ~ ,- - ~~ - '~, : ~"'J "'H-'" ~' 1;:1 PIoo....Hodlid.. (253) 945-2000 ¡ ;!¡ "'UOOI..... rL \ ;-~;¡ -. t:.... L ---- ",.,-" "'LiOOl I ,-~-.. ,..~ .~~.- .......w..,w.- 1/ E F G -T -- H 10 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3- SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast - 2000 through 2005 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines- do not take into consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equivalent (FIE) capacity is based on: . The number of classrooms available in each school Any special requirements at each school The contracted class load by grade level . . In general, the District's current standard provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grade K is 24 students, for grades 1-6 is 26 students and grades 7-12 is 25 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students, individual education programs classrooms are 15 students, and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current ratios and trends as well as the classroom physical size. Educational Program Capacities change every year. This analysis is for the 1999/00 school year. The capacity of an individual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which may require additional space. 12 FEDERAL \VA Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Adelaide 488 Brigadoon 528 Camelot 374 Enterprise 512 Green Gables 494 Lake Dolloff 482 Lake Grove 476 L.akeland 488 Mark Twain 503 Meredith Hill . 498 Mirror Lake 398 Nautilus 542 Olympic View 450 Panther Lake 514 Rainier View 468 Sherwood Forest 550 Silver Lake 528 Star Lake 502 Sunnycrest 462 Twin Lakes 502 Valhalla 494 Wildwood 428 Woodmont 450 1998 TOTAL 11,131 484 I Elementary Average Notes: JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY IIIahee Kilo Lakota Sacajawea Saghalie Totem 821 854 741 828 768 709 1 'Junior High Average I 787 , SENIOR HIGH BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Decatur 1,165 Federal Way 1,394 Thomas Jefferson 1,373 1998 TOTAL 3,932 I 1,311 ( ¡Senior High Average ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY 194 1998 TOTAL 210 Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations in the building, contracted class size, and special use classrooms in place during the 99/00 school year. All available instructional space is calculated. Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading. The calculation is based on 25 students per available teaching stations. Capacities were calculated by the Study and Survey Committee. 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school .with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school for an interim classroom, or used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs. Some portables may not be fit. to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS PORTABLES LOCATED AT SENIOR ffiGHS 11011 L'($ß.CC110IlAL ClSnCC11OI1AL Adelaide 3 Brigadoon 1 Camelot 1 Enterprise 2 Green Gables 1 Lake DolIòtt 2 Lake Grove 2 Lakeland 2 Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 2 Mirror Lake 4 ¡Nautilus 1 Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 3 Rainier View 3 Sherwood Forest 4 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunnycrest 1 Twin Lakes -:- 2 1 Valhalla Wildwood 4 Woodmont 2 lufAL 53 1 NOli ..I:ISTRUC110NAL I:<STRUC110IlAL Decatur 4 Federal Way - 1 Thomas Jefferson Truman/Merit 8 1 TUTAL 13 I PORTABLES LOCATED AT SUPPORT FACILITIES 5-Mile Lake 1 MOT 1 Clothing Bank 1 TOTAL 3 HEAD START PORT ABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Mirror Lake 1 Sherwood Forest 1 Total 2 PORTABLES LOCATED AT JUNIOR HIGHS liON I:<STRCC110llAL I:<STRCC110llAL Federal Way Public Academy 5 1 Hlahee 3 Kilo 3 1 Lakota 3 Sacajawea 2 Saghalie 4 Totem 5 TOTAL 25 2 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly rélated to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using three distinct methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. The second method uses enrollment-forecasting software tied to a geographic information system. MicroSAMTM software establishes survival, migrant and repeater rates for each grade level in a pre-defined geographic area. These rates are matched to the number of housing units per area. The rates are then used to project the following year's enrollment based on the number of planned new housing units. The software will project for five years. The third method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Maste?M software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Short-tenn budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression model. For the 1999/00 school year, the district chose the Enrollment MasterTM projection using standard grade progression model. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near tenn future when the near future looks much like the near past. Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes infonnation from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial management for the State of Washington. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district in the future. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Junior High FTE=.989 Headcounl; Senior High FTE = .932 Headcount) Total K -12 Percent School Year Elementary Junior High Senior High FTE -- Change 1993-94 10,545 4,432 3,750 18,727 1994-95 10,505 4,626 3,758 18,889 - 0.9% 1995-96 10,689 4,838 3,796 19,323 2.2% 1996-97 10,863 4,930 3,913 19,706 1.9% 1997-98 11,123 5,073 4,082 20,278 2.8% 1998-99 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 1.9% 1999-00 11,622 5,110 4,348 21,079 1.9% PlOOO-OI 11,595 5,178 ,1,-136 21,209""'" 0.6% nOO1-02 II,562 5,421 4,465 21,448 1.1% nOO2-03 11,535 5,621 ./,./80 21,636 0.9% * PlO03-04 9,699 5,572 6,.f37 21,708 0.3% nO04-05 9,672 5,570 6,663 21,905 0.9% P2005-06 9,673 5,659 6,716 22,048 0.6% * New Conflguratio Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast 23,000 22,000 21,000 § 20,000 0 0 'C 10 ~ 19,000 ~ CI> Sl 0 Õ 18,000 0 17,000 16,000 15.000 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% ~ .~ ~ ~ I ~ I II I.~ ~ ;-'. ~ .~ ~. . ..4 0 II) 10 1.5% t c: ';/. 1.0% 0.5% .. 0.0% ~ ..;) ..;) ..;) ..;) ..;) ..;) ~ 'b 'b 'b '"b '"b 'b ~ ~ '3- '?? «.> Vs:,. ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ 'q¡. 17 ~ t-> ~ 17 ~ <917 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1.£. ~ '£> ~ "& ~ ~ School Year , ~.~ I FTE -+-PercentofChange l 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, junior high, and senior high levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Actual 1999 2000 - - Projected - - 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 19,994 :z 19,994 19,968 20,048 ~ 20,472 GJ "1 ~ 0.. ~ () 0 ::I :=t a::I s:: "1 ~ ~ ... 0 ::I 21,796 21,770 Add or subtract changes to capacity Special Education Changes Truman High modernization and expansion Increase Capacity at Three High Schools New Middle School New High School (26) (26) 106 (26) (26) (26) 450 800 1,350 Adjusted Program Capacity 19,994 19,968 20,048 20,472 21,796 21,770 22,570 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 21,079 21,209 21,448 21,636 21,708 21,905 22,048 Internet Academy Enrollment 487 550 600 650 680 705 730 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,592 20,659 20,848 20,986 21,028 21,200 21,318 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,275 2,275 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity Federal Way Public Academy 150 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,275 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 2,425 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY 1,677 1,734 1,625 1,911 3,193 2,995 3,677 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY Actual 1999 2000 - - Projected - - 200 I 2002 Z Q ... < C') ., ~ Co Q 2003 2003 2004 11,131 11,131 11,105 I 1,079 11,053 11,027 11,001 I. Special Education Changes (26) (26) (26) () 0 :s ::1 ItCI C ., ~ .... õ' :s (26) (26) Adjusted Program Capacity 11,131 II, I 05 I 1,079 11,053 11,027 I 1,00 I 11,00 I . ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment I 1,622 11,595 11,562 11,535 9,699 9,672 9,673 2. Internet Academy 138 150 150 150 130 130 130 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy I 1,484 II ,445 11,412 11,385 9,569 9,542 9,543 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 1,325 1,325 I ,400 1,400 1,350 1,350 1,350 Add/Subtract portable capacity 75 Move to High School (50) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,325 1,400 1,400 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY 972 1,060 1,067 1,018 2,808 2,809 2,808 NOTES: I. Add Programs 3 ECEAP, I SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and I Pre-School Program. This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated. 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until pennanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 21 FEDERAL \VA Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BUILDING PROGRAM z I') .. -< CAPACITY 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 C) 4,721 4,721 4,721 ., t.1 0. I') I. Add New Middle School (') 0 800 ::s :I qQ C ., t.1 =-. 0 Adjusted Program Capacity 4,721 4,721 4,721 4,721 ::s 4,721 4,721 5,521 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,110 5,178 5,421 5,621 5,572 5,570 5,659 2. Internet Academy 185 200 225 250 275 275 275 Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 4,925 4,978 5,196 5,371 5,297 5,295 5,384 SURPLUS OR (UNt!°USED) PROGRAM CAPACITY RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY 3. Current Portable Capacity 625 625 700 700 700 700 700 Add/Subtract portable capacity 4. Federal Way Public Academy 75 Adjusted Portable Capacity 625 700 700 700 700 700 700 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 421 443 225 50 124 126 837 NOTES: I. Add new middle school 2. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 4 Federal Way Public Academy will increase capacity at one junior high site. 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Actual - - Projected - - CAPACITY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 BUILDING PROGRAM z Q :< CAPACITY 4,142 4,142 4,142 4,248 C) 4,698 6,048 6,048 ., t) Q, Add or subtract changes in capacity Q () I. Truman Remodel 106 0 ::s 2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools 450 ::¡ at¡ 3. Add New High School c ., 1,350 t) ... 0 Adjusted Program Capacity 4,142 4,142 4,248 4,698 ::s 6,048 6,048 6,048 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 4,348 4,436 4,465 4,480 6,437 6,663 6,716 4. Internet Academy 164 200 225 250 275 300 325 Basic Ed without Internet Academy 4,184 4,236 4,240 4,230 6,162 6,363 6,391 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (343) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 5. Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 375 375 375 Add\Subtract portable capacity Add from Elementary 50 Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 325 375 375 375 375 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 283 231 333 843 261 60 32 NOTES: I. Truman High School modernization and expansion 2. Add capacity to three existing high schools 3. Add new high school 4. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 5. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based upon actual population needs. 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To detennine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a fonnula was established. This fonnula can be found in King County Code 2IA and was also substanially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was detennined separately for single family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi-family units, which were constructed in the last five- (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. Multi-Family Units 1$2,710.1 1$830.1 Single Family Units 24 FEDERAL WA \' PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School Senior High Total Single Family Multl.Family Elementary Middle School Senior High Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwe11ings Dwe11ings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor (99)Greenfield Park 27 0 ~ 2 5 0.11111111 0.07407407 0.18518519 0.37037037 (99) Heritage Woods 67 0 10 4 6 0.14925373 0.05970149 0.08955224 0.29850746 (98) Brookshire North 21 0 6 1 3 0.28571429 0.04761905 0.14285714 0.47619048 (98) StoneBrook 111 0 48 22 26 0.43243243 0.19819820 0.23423423 0.86486486 (97) Southern Rose 25 0 10 9 4 0.40000000 0.36000000 0.16000000 0.92000000 (97) Grouse Pointe .--...,... 30 0 7 10 8 0.23333333 0.83333333 0.33333333 0.26666667 (96) Bellacarino Woods .--.- - 16 106 0 38 15 0.35849057 0.15094340 0.14150943 0.65094340 (96) The Highlands 69 0 19 5 9 0.27536232 0.07246377 0.13043478 0.47826087 (95) Camelot III 21 0 16 6 0 0.76190476 0.28571429 0.00000000 1.04761905 (95) Campus Glen ------ 98 0 12 13 13 0.12244898 0.13265306 0.13265306 0.38775510 Total 575 0 169 88 89 Student Generation 0.2939 0.1530 0.1548 0.6017 Single Family Student Generation Multi-Family Student Generation Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School Senior High Total Single Family Multl.Family Elementary Middle School Senior High Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwe11ings Dwe\1lngs Students Students Students Factor Factor F.actor Factor Barclay Ridge 0 240 18 6 20 0.07500000 0.02500000 0.08333333 0.18333333 Saddlebrook 0 213 9 5 10 0.04225352 0.02347418 0.04694836 0.11267606 Sunrise Garden Townhomes 0 35 5 1 2 0.14285714 0.02857143 0.05714286 0.22857143 0 488 32 12 32 0.0656 0.0246 0.0656 0.1557 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost: Studeat Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage t~l~ Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.00 $0 484 0.2939 0.0656 $0 $0 Middle School ........ '~.'l~0'-~ ........ '~0,"-~b"b' ..... 800 .................. -~'~j ....... 6.0'~2'~'g '- $191 $31 Sr High 40.00 $80,000 1,350 ................ ~.'~4'~ 0.0656 $367 $155 TOTAL $'558 $186 School Construction Cost: Student Student % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ 1 otal ~q r t ,~v~t Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 96.70% $0 484 0.2939 0.0656 $0 $0 Middle School ............ ~%-. 7-o-~ ' ~'i':~6b-o-~i5 b-6 .............. ~'6~5 ............. o.-i33~ ...... '-~246 $3,144 $505 Sr High ........... ~'~.'Y'0~?i ~-/6i~'6'61iY6'0" ............. 'i3X6' ............. ~Yfi'~ ........ ~?,3'~ $4,524 $1,917 TOTAL $7,668 $2,423 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ 'l'otat :>q t~t ~o~t Size SFR MFR SFR MFR . Elementary 3.30°,4 $60,374 25 0.2939 0.0656 $23 $5 Middle School I ............. ~'i~'~7~;~ ....... ~-~'~'~'1 .................... ~ ....................... ~]¥~'~6 ............ -~i~'~(} $12 $2 S r High [ .............. '3-.'~'~-~ .......... ¥~;§'~'~i- ................. 7"[~ ................. -1~]]'~-4'~ ............ --I~i~'~ $12 $5 TOTAL $48 $12 State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Sq l-'t ~tuoent Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $101.39 O' 0.00% 0.2939 0.0656 $0 $0 Middle School $101.39 110 0.00% ................... -I~'i"~'5'~ ............... ~..i~ ~'~'~ $0 $0 New Sr High $101.39 120 60.62% ...................... ~.~'~'~ 0.0656 $1,142 $484 Total $1,142 $484 SFR MFR Tax Payment Credit Calculation Average Assessed Value (April 2000) $163,436 $45,536 ..... -g~/:/~,~ .......... ~3-~0~o- .... Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 2000) ,..~--i~b~6--].~-~-0- -.--~§-~'6-,'[6~4-~'' Net Present Value of Average Dwelling ....................... : .............. 10 10 Years Amortized ...... Property Tax Levy Rate $1,713 $477 Present Value of Revenue Stream Single Family Multi-Family .Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 558 $ 186 Permanent Facility Cost $ 7,668 $ 2,423 Temporary Facility Cost $ 48 $ 12 State Match Credit $ (1,142) $ (484) Tax Payment Credit $ (1,713) $ (477) Sub-Total $ 5,419 $ 1,660 50% Local Share $ 2,710 $ 830 [[[mpact Fee $ 2,710 $ 830'11 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 1999100 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 1998/99 Plan and the 1999/00 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Marketing Academy is removed from the inventory INVENTORY OF UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Site 85 is added to inventory - purchased site for the new senior high school. NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES New High School site has been purchased and is removed from the needs forecast. MOT Site is removed from the needs forecast. This project is not actively being planned at this time. The current MOT site is not for sale at this time. SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2000/2005 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES 'PLAN SECTION 1II - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY The average capacity of senior high schools is increased from 1232 to 131~'1. This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs in place for the 199_9/00 school year. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 1999 through 2005.' The new forecast reflects a decreased rate of growth. Enrollment History and Projections are found on page 18. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 2lA The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan and the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29. 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC sCHOOLS 1999/00 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 1998/99 TO 1999/00 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 1999/00 Capital Facilities Plan and tl3e 1998/99 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments. Student allocation is also changed to reflect the middle school configuration. The Student General worksheet is found on page 25. IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 96.95 to Report #30SPI 96.70% Percent Temporary Facilities 3.05% to Updated portable inventory 3.30% Temporary Facility Cost $62,368 to Updated cost of most recently $60,374 purchased portables Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft $99.68 to Change per OSPI $101.39 Sq. Ft. Student/Middle School 112 to Square Foot Allocation change from 110 Junior High to Middle School State Match 59.89% to Change per OSPI 60.62% Average Assessed Value SFR - Per Puget Sound Educational Service $153.095 to District (F_SD 121) $163,436 MFR - $35,488 To $45,536 Capital Bond Interest Rate 5.11% to Market Rate 5.94% 29 MEETING DATE: September 5, 2000 ITEM# '~'~ ~) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: EMS / Patient Transport Fees CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ N/A ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ N/A BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ -0- HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: FEDRAC Committee Report, Kin~ County staff analysis of transport fees SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: See attached FEDRAC Committee Report CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: "Forward to the full City Council a l'g~mmgndation that the city's negotiating position support the continued discussion of transport fees throughout the EMS 2002 Task Force process." CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the committee's recommendation. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKE~ ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED 1st Reading TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL FINANCE I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT / REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Date: July 25, 2000 Via: David M~anager From: Jim Hamilton,~Rv~ Department Administrator/~ Derek Mathesc~h, Assistant to the City Subject: EMS / Patient Transport Fees Backeround At its May meeting, committee members reviewed the EMS 2002 Task Force's work and discussed both levy term and transport fees. While the committee recommended a six-year levy as the city's negotiating position, it asked that transport fees for Advanced Life Support ("ALS") operations be deferred until a later meeting to allow for a more thorough discussion. Complete financial data are not yet known, but an average fee of just over $500 is assumed to reduce the levy by about ten percent. RegardleSs, this discussion is based more on philosophical grounds than on fiscal grounds. Patient transport fees are charged by public agencies many places throughout the country. While there would be some confusion at first here in King County, it would appear that the fees have a successful track record for the most part. There certainly remains an issue of whether the voters will endorse the combination of an EMS levy and a fee for service. These issues are discussed in more depth in the attached information. As a side note, the Federal Way Fire Department does not use transport fees to support its Basic Life Support ("BLS,) operations. While the district would prefer not to charge fees, fees have been considered as a potential source of funding for meeting district goals and offsetting decreasing property tax revenues. Attachments King County staff ~ysis of transport fees and related issues from the EMS Task Force's May 31 agenda packet. Committee Re c o mm en-~d-~t~%]i~) ~ ont O~rd to the full City Council a recommendation that the city's negotiating position support the ~-~ inued discussion of transport fees throughout the EMS 2002 Task Force process. (Option 1) Forward to the full City Council a recommendation stating that the city recognizes the potential benefit of transport fees, but the city's negotiating position does not support continued discussion of transport fees at this time. (Option 2) Attachment 1 Partial King County Staff Analysis of ALS Transport Fees Background: Paramedic units transported 20,682 patients (King County and Seattle) in 1998. No fees have been assessed since the first levy in 1979 for transport. Further analysis is needed to determine if some providers would experience an increase in operating costs. Regional Source: The Financial Planning Task Force recommended that transport fees for paramedic services be considered as a possible funding source for regional EMS services. All paramedic providers currently supplement the unit cost funding provided by King County. An analysis conducted during the 1998 Strategic Plan estimated levy fimding covered approximately 95% of the actual cost. If local jurisdictions choose to impose a transport fee, it would be reasonable that it be used as a local revenue source to offset local portion of paramedic costs. Impact on Service: If the reason for charging a transport fee is to generate revenue, the motivation for providing the service changes. More transports equate to more revenue. The strategic plan identified strategies aimed at reducing demand and reducing transports. Equity: Users of EMS services pay for transport services. Administration: No local jurisdictions currently charge for transport. Agencies would have to either set up in-house billing and collection services or contract out for services. Revenue Stability: Medicare and Medicaid are major third party payers. Changes in reimbursement practices and greater emphasis on eapitated coverage could lower revenues. Political risk/feasibility: Uncertain, since transport fees would not provide full funding. Imposition of fees may jeopardize voter support for a levy or other funding. Legal issues: Under 1-695 imposition of transport fees may require a vote of the public depending on final resolution. Another issue is the County's ability to establish a fee in cities. Financial Issues: Our cursory analysis indicates transport fees could generate as much as $6.7 million per year (see below based on Pierce County current collection rate of 70% and fee charged of $510 per transport. Central Pierce fee per transport increased 31% since 1998 from $388 to $510 in 2000). Based on assumptions regarding fees, collection rates and administrative costs these agencies could generate the following transport revenues: Seattle $3.2 million; Bellevue $828,000; South King County $1.8 million; Evergreen $633,000; and Shoreline $263,000. However, if the potential revenue gain is translated into a levy rate offset, it would appear to amount to about $10 ($8.75 if a 60% collection rate is experienced) per year for the average household in 1999 (average residential dwellinE 1999 AV = $230,500). ALS Transport Fees: Potential Revenue Estimates under two scenarios: Central Pierce 60% collection .......... A. Average Fee per ALS Transport i ................................. .$.5..!.0...i ................................. .$...5...I..0..... B. Total ALS Transports in 19982 i 20,682 i 20,682 C. Percent Collection Rate 70% i 60% D. Percent of Non-Collection Rate 35% ! 40% E. Total Estimated Collectible Gross Revenue from Transport Fee (A*B*C) .................... .$.7..,..3..8..3..,. ~ ...................... $..6..:3..28,.~.. F. Total Estimated Un-~olleetible (Bad Debt Amount) Transport Fee (A*B*D) .................... .$..3..,..1..6...4.,..3...4..6. ....................... $.4.,.2.1..9..,...O0q.... H. Total Estimated Expenditures (A'G) ........................ .$.6..2...0.,.~ .......................... .$...6.2..0..~.0...0...0...~ I. Total Estimated Net Revenue from ALS Transports (E - FI) ..................... ........................ s Scenario I uses Central Pierce County current information as of May 2000 for items A and C. Scenario 2 uses Central Pierce County for Item A only. 2 ToOl King County EMS (including Seattle) 1998 ALS Transpom as reported in the 1999 KC EMS Aunual Report 3 Administrative Costs: Assumes vendor contract prices between $20 and $30 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Chelan County Regional Jail Interlocal Agreement CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Memo from Interim Chief Chaney to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee regarding the Chelan County Regional Jail Interlocal Agreement, the Jail Cost Comparisons for Long Term Sentencing, Attachment A, inclusive of the Misdemeanor Jail Rate Comparison, and the final draft for an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Chelan County. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Intedocal Cooperation Act as governed by RCW Chapter 39.34.080, the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with Chelan County for a cooperative effort to provide Federal Way Department of Public Safety with cost-effective housing of inmates in the Chelan County Regional Jail. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions by which Chelan County will provide Federal Way Department of Public Safety a place of confinement for the incarceration of one or more inmates lawfully committed to its custody, as well as compensation mutually agreed upon by both County and City for said services. The term set forth will begin August 1, 2000 and end December 31, 2001 and will automatically renew until terminated by written notice received sixty(60) days prior to the termination date. This Agreement also outlines other specific concerns relevant to mutual expectations and responsibilities. With the estimated 40% increase to the King County Jail billings over the past 18 months, the Department is exploring several proactive approaches to reduce jail costs. The benefits realized by this new venture.would afford Federal Way an opportunity to build a favorable relationship between the Department of Public Safety and Chelan County and allow the Department to obtain one of the jail cost objectives. The Chelan County Regional Jail maintains 192 beds and is currently undergoing renovations to add 40 work release beds with an additional 100 work release beds to be added in one year. At the present, the County is contracting with the Federal Border Patrol and is currently negotiating with another law enforcement agency. The County contracts private medical staffm$ and provides the inmates with commissary accounts. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the August 7, 2000, meeting the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee Meeting recommended that the proposed Chelan County Interlocal Agreement be forwarded to City Council for consideration. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to authori:fe the City Manager to si~[n the agreement. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKE~': Ftv\ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: COUNCIL BILL # APPROVED 1 st Reading DENIED Enactment Reading TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Item 5B DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Date: August 7, 2000 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Thomas J. Chancy, Sr., Interim Chief of Police Via: David M~~q~lanager Subject: Chelan County Regional Jail Interloeal Agreement Background: Pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act as governed by RCW Chapter 39.34.080, the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with Chelan County for a cooperative effort to provide Federal Way Department of Public Safety with cost-effective housing of inmates in the Chelan County Regional Jail. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions by which Chelan County will provide Federal Way Department of Public Safety a place of confinement for the incarceration of one or more inmates lawfully committed to its custody, as well as compensation mutually agreed upon by both County and City for said services. The term set forth will begin August 1, 2000 and end December 31, 2001 and will automatically renew until terminated by written notice received sixty (60) days prior to the termination date. This Agreement also outlines other specific concerns relevant to mutual expectations and responsibilities. With the estimated 40% increase to the King County Jail billings over the past 18 months, the Department is exploring several proactive approaches to reduce j ail costs. The benefits realized by this new venture would afford Federal Way an opportunity to build a favorable relationshipbetween the Department of Public Safety and Chelan County and allow the Department to obtain one of the jail cost objectives. The Chelan County Regional Jail maintains 192 beds and is currently undergoing renovations to add 40 work release beds with an additional 100 work release beds to be added in one year. At the present, the County is contracting with the Federal Border Patrol and is currently negotiating with another law enforcement agency. The County contracts private medical staffing and provides the inmates with commissary accounts. Attached is the final draft for an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Chelan County. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and the Chelan County for the housing of inmates. I/I .Al IR A/M~.IAIqFNI~A/PqlfiRO~7Ofi/C'MFI ,AN Attachment "A" At the request of the Public Safety Committee, the following comparison information is offered to the City Council for their review during the consideration of the jail contracts with both Chelan County and Okanogan County for housing of"post conviction misdemeanor violators." The data used for comparison was actual misdemeanor maintenance days from the Regional Justice Center for the first six months of 2000 and projecting that 35% of the total maintenance days was for "long term commitments." JAIL COST COMPARISONS FOR LONG TERM SENTENCING I ng _County * N/A $281,045.28 $281,045.28 N/A Chelan County -0- $192,805.20 $192,805.20 $88,240.08 or 31% Okanogan County $8,904 $151,951.10 $160,855.10 $120,190.18 or 57% · No charge if subject was originally booked into King County jail facility. This data represents significant savings could have occurred, assuming the long term sentencing amounted to 35% of the total misdemeanor maintenance days, for the first six months of 2000 through either of the eastern Washington county jail contracts. Therefore, I believe it would be beneficial for the City to enter into these jail contracts with both Chelan and Okanogan Counties. Cost projections obtained from the report completed by Administrative Commander Coulombe, utilizing RJC billing information and contract rates from Chelan and Okanogan Counties. Copy of Commander Coulombe's report attached. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION MEMORANDUM ' TO: Deputy Chief Brian Wilson _..' ~'~'~ ~11~ FROM: Daniel J. Coulombe, Administrative Commander ~0L0 DATE: August 16th, 2000 SUBJECT: Misdemeanor Jail Rate Comparison During the first six months of 2000, the Federal Way Department of Public Safety has conducted 1272 Misdemeanor bookings into King County, and 9837 Misdemeanor Maintenance days of incarceration. The cost of booking is $137.65 each, and each maintenance day is $63.83. The total cost for these bookings is $175,090.80, and $627,895.71 for maintenance, for a grand total of $802,986.51 for Misdemeanor charges in the first six months of 2000. If the same number of bookings and maintenance days were experienced using the proposed contract with Okanogan County, the booking fee would be $20.00 per person or a total of $25,440.00, the maintenance fee would be $42.00 daily, or $434,146.00, for a grand total of $459,586.00. Using the same totals and applying the conditions of the Chelan Country contract, there would be no fee for booking, $56.00 maintenance fee for males, and $60.00 for women, totaling $550,888.00 for the maintenance days. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CHELAN COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, FOR THE HOUSING OF INMATES IN THE CHELAN COUNTY REGIONAL JAIL THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 31stday of July , 2000 by and between the City of Federal Way, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the Board of County Commissioners of Chelan County, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Chelan County", each party having been duly organized and now existing under the laws of the State of Washington. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County Director .of Corrections and the City Manager are authorized by law to have charge and custody of the County Jail and the City prisoners or inmates, respectively; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to designate the Chelan County Regional Jail as a place of confinement for the incarceration of one or more inmates lawfully committed to its custody; and WHEREAS, The Chief of Corrections of Chelan County is desirous of accepting and keeping in his custody such inmate(s) in the Chelan County Regional Jail for a rate of compensation mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto; and WHEREAS, RCW 39.34.08 and other Washington law, as amended, authorizes any county to contract with any other county or city to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which each contracting county is authorized by law to perform; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of each of the parties hereto have determined to enter into this Agreement as authorized and provided for by RCW 39.34.080 and other Washington law, as amended, NOW, THEREFORE; in consideration of the above and foregoing recitals, the payments to be made, the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. GOVERNING LAW The parties hereto agree that, except where expressly otherwise provided, the laws and administrative roles and regulations of the State of Washington shall govern in any matter relating to an inmate(s) confined pursuant to this Agreement. Intcrlocal Agreement Between Chclan County/City of Federal Way 1 06/23/00 2. DURATION This Agreement shall enter into full force and effect from August 1, 2000 and end December 31, 2001, subject to earlier termination as provided by Section 3 herein. This Agreement shall be renewed automatically for like successive periods under such terms and conditions as the parties may determine. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require the City to house inmates in Chelan County continuously. 3. TERMINATION (a) By either party. This Agreement may be terminated by written notice from either party to the other party delivered by regular mail to the contact person identified herein, provided that termination shall become effective sixty (60) working days after receipt of such notice. Within said sixty (60) days, the City agrees to remove its inmate(s) from the Chelan County Regional Jail. (b) By City due to lack of funding. The obligation of the City to pay Chelan County under the provision of this Agreement beyond the current fiscal year is expressly made contingent upon the appropriation, budgeting availability of sufficient funds by the City. In the event that such funds are not budgeted, appropriated or otherwise made available for the purpose of payment under this Agreement at any time after the current fiscal year, then the City shall have the option of terminating the Agreement upon written notice to Chelan County, except that all services provided to that point shall be compensated at the agreed rate. The termination of this Agreement for this reason will not cause any penalty to be charged to the City. (c) In the event of termination of this Agreement for any reason, the City shall compensate Chelan County for prisoners housed by Chelan County after notice of such termination until the City retakes its inmates in the same manner and at the same rates as if this agreement had not been terminated. 4. MAILING ADDRESSES All notices, report, and correspondence to the respective parties of this Agreement shall be sent to the following: Chelan County: Chelan County Regional Jail 401 Washington Street, Level 2 Wenatchee, WA 98801 Contact Person: Frank Young, Chief of Corrections City of Federal Way: City of Federal Way City Manager's Office 33530 1st Way S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Contact Person: David H. Moseley, City Manager Interlocal Agreement Between Chelan County/City of Federal Way 2 06/23/00 r 5. COMPENSATION (a) Rates. Chelan County agrees to perform one (1) transport per week from both'the King County Co-~-~ectional Facility, 500 5th Avenue, Seattle, WA and the Regional Justice Center, 401 4th Avenue N., Kent, WA, and accept and house City inmates for compensation per day per inmate at the rates of $56.00 per day. This includes classification 2 prisoners. Women are to be included at a rate of $60.00 per day. The parties agree that Chelan County will not charge a separate booking fee in addition to such rate. (b) Billing and payment. Chelan County agrees to provide the City with an itemized bill listing all names of inmates who are housed, the case/citation number, the number of days housed (including the date and time of booking and date and time of release), and the dollar amount due for each. Chelan County agrees to provide said bill by the 10t~ of each month. The City agrees to make payment to Chelan County within thirty (30) days of receipt of such bill for the amount billed for the previous calendar month. 6. RIGHT OF INSPECTION The City shall have the right to inspect, at all reasonable times, all Chelan County facilities in which inmates of the City are confined in order to determine if such jail maintains standards of confinement acceptable to the City and that such inmates therein are treated equally regardless of race, religion, color, creed or national origin; provided, however, that Chelan County shall be obligated to manage, maintain and operate its facilities consistent with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 7. FURLOUGHS, PASSES, AND WORK RELEASE Chelan County agrees that no early releases or alternatives to incarceration, including furloughs, passes, work crews, electronic home detention, or work release shall be granted to any inmate housed pursuant to this Agreement without written authorization by the committing court. 8. INMATE ACCOUNTS Chelan County shall establish and maintain an account for each inmate received from the City and shall credit to such account all money which is received and shall make disbursements, debiting such accounts in accurate amounts for the inmate's personal needs. Disbursements shall be made in limited amounts as are reasonably necessary for personal maintenance. The Chief of Corrections for Chelan County Regional Jail shall be accountable to the City for such inmate funds. At either the termination of this Agreement, the inmate's death, release from incarceration or return to either the City or indefinite release to the court, the inmate's money shall be transferred to the inmate's account in care of the City. lnterlocal Agreement Between Chelan County/City of Federal Way 3 06/23/00 9. RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFENDER'S CUSTODY It shall be the responsibility of Chelan County to confine the inmate or inmates; to provide treatment, including the furnishing of subsistence and all necessary medical and hospital services and supplies; to provide for the inmates' physical needs; to make available to them programs and/or treatment consistent with the individual needs; to retain them in said custody; to supervise them; to maintain proper discipline and control; to make certain that they receive no special privileges and that the sentence and orders of the committing court in the State are faithfully executed; provided that nothing herein contained shall be construed to require Chelan County, or any of its agents, to provide treatment, facilities or programs for any inmates confined pursuant to this Agreement, which it does not provide for similar inmates not confined pursuant to this Agreement. 10. MEDICAL SERVICES (a) Inmates from the City shall receive such medical, psychiatric and dental treatment as may be necessary to safeguard their health while housed in the Chelan County Regional Jail. Chelan County shall provide or arrange for the providing of such medical, psychiatric and dental services. Except for routine minor medical services, the City shall pay directly or reimburse Chelan County for all costs associated with the delivery of any emergency and/or major medical service provided to City inmates. (b) An adequate record of all such services shall be kept by Chelan County for the City's review at its request. Any medical or dental services of major consequence shall be reported to the City as soon as time permits. (c) Should medical or dental services require hospitalization, the City agrees to compensate Chelan County dollar for dollar any amount expended or cost incurred in providing the same; provided that, except in emergencies, the City will be notified by contacting the City's Public Safety Department Watch Commander at (253) 661-4600 prior to the inmate's transfer to a hospital and nothing herein shall preclude the City from retaking the ill or injured imnates. 11. DISCIPLINE Chelan County shall have physical control over and power to execute disciplinary authority over all inmates of the City. However, nothing contained herein shall be construed to authorize or permit the imposition of a type of discipline prohibited by the Laws of the State of Washington. 12. RECORDS AND REPORTS (a) The City shall forward to Chelan County before or at the time of delivery of each inmate; a copy of all inmate records pertaining to the inmate's present incarceration at the King County Correctional Facility and/or the Regional Justice Center. If additional information is requested regarding a particular inmate, the parties shall mutually cooperate to provide any additional information. lnterlocal Agreement Between Chelan County/City of Federal Way 4 06/23/00 (b) Chelan County shall keep all necessary and pertinent records concerning such inmates in the manner mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto. During an inmate's confinement in Chelan County, the City shall upon request be entitled to receive and be furnished with copies of any report or record associated with said inmate(s) incarceration. 13. REMOVAL FROM THE JAIL An inmate of the City legally confined in Chelan County shall not be removed therefrom by any person without written authorization from the City or by order of any court having jurisdiction. Chelan County agrees that no early releases or alternatives to incarceration, including furloughs, passes, work release, work crews or electronic home detention shall be granted to any inmate without written authorization from the committing court. This paragraph shall not apply to an emergency necessitating the immediate removal of the inmate for medical, dental, psychiatric treatment or other catastrophic condition presenting an eminent danger to the safety of the inmate or to the inmates or personnel of Chelan County. In the event of any such emergency removal, Chelan County shall inform the City of the whereabouts of the inmate or inmates so removed, at the earliest practicable time, and shall exercise ail reasonable care for the safe keeping and custody of such inmate or inmates. 14. ESCAPES In the event any City inmate shall escape from Chelan County's custody, Chelan County will use all reasonable means to recapture the inmate. The escape shall be reported immediately to the City. Chelan County shall have the primary responsibility for and authority to direct the pursuit and retaking of the inmate or inmates within its own territory. Any cost in connections therewith shall be chargeable to and borne by Chelan County; however, Chelan County shall not be required to expend unreasonable amounts to pursue and return inmates from other states or other countries. 15. DEATH OF AN INMATE (a) In the event of the death of a City inmate, the Chelan County Coroner shall be notified. The City shall receive copies of any recOrds made at or in connection with such notification. (b) Chelan County shall immediately notify the City of the death of a City inmate, furnish information as requested and follow the instructions of the City with regard to the disposition of the body. The body shall not be released except on written order of the appropriate officials of the City. Written notice shall be provided within three weekdays of receipt by the City of notice of such death. All expenses relative to any necessary preparation of the body and shipment charges shall be paid by the City. With the City's consent, Chelan County may arrange for burial and all matters related or incidental thereto, and all such expenses shall be paid by the City. The provisions of this paragraph shall govern only the relations between or among the parties hereto and shall not affect the liability of any relative or other person for the disposition of the deceased or for any expenses connected therewith. Interlocal Agreement Between Chelan County/City of Federal Way 5 06/23/00 (c) The City shall receige a certified copy of the death certificate for any of its inmates who have died while in Chelan County custody. 16. RETAKING OF INMATES Upon request from Chelan County, the City shall, at its expense, retake any City inmate within thirty-six (36) hours after receipt of such request. In the event the confinement of any City inmate is terminated for any reason, the City shall, at its expense, retake such inmate at Chelan County. 17. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION Chelan County will assume the liability for the custody and care of City prisoners once they are in the custody of Chelan County, specifically including prisoners being transported by Chelan County employees, agents, or contracts. Chelan County shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of Chelan County and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, Chelan County's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of Chelan County's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes Chelan County's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 18. MISCELLANEOUS (a) Chelan County shall have the right to refuse to accept any inmate from the City when, in the opinion of Chelan County, its inmate census is at capacity or so near capacity that there is a substantial risk that, through usual operation of the jail, the reasonable operational capacity limits of the jail might be reached or exceeded. (b) Chelan County shall further have the right to refuse to accept any inmate from the City who, in the judgment of Chelan County, has a current illness or injury which may adversely affect the operations of the Chelan County Regional Jail, has a history of serious medical problems, presents a substantial risk of escape, or presents a substantial risk of injury to other persons or property. (c) City prisoners incarcerated in Chelan County pursuant to this Agreement shall be transported to Chelan County by and at the expense of the City and shall be returned, if necessary, to the City by City personnel and at the City's expense. Except for the weekly transports provided in paragraph 5 above, Chelan County is not responsible for transportation of Interlocal Agreement Between Chelan County/City of Federal Way 06/23/00 6 City prisoners under this Agreement and shall be reimbursed by the City for any actual expenses incurred in transport of an inmate if, in fact, transportation of an inmate by Chelan County becomes necessary. (d) In providing services under this contract, Chelan county is an independent commctor and neither it nor its officers, agents or employees are employees of the city for. any purpose, including responsibility for any federal or state tax, industrial insurance or Social Security liability. Neither shall the provision of services under this Agreement give rise to any claim of career service or civil service rights, which may accrue to an employee of the city under any applicable law, role or regulation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above and foregoing Agreement has been executed in duplicate by the parties hereto and made effective on the day and year first above written: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOARD OF CHELAN C(~INTY By. J DAVID H. MOSELEY, City Manager ~ A. HUNTER, Chairman ATTEST: /- ~~~STI~~A~IfW, o ss~oner N. Christine Green, CMC, City Clerk DATED: JAMES C. LYNCH, Commissioner Att Approved as to Form: Dated: Londi K. Lindell, City Attorney .~.. . CHELAN..C~Y SHERIFF'S Gary/R]esen, Chelan County Prosecutor ~ '6hael L. Brickert, Sheriff lnterlocal Agreement Between Chelan Counly/City of Federal Way 7 6/23/00 MEETING DATE: September 5, 2000 ITEM// CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Okanogan County Jail Interlocal Agreement CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Memo from Interim Chief Chaney to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee regarding the Okanogan County Regional Jail Interlocal Agreement, the Jail Cost Comparisons for Long Term Sentencing, Attachment A, inclusive of the Misdemeanor Jail Rate Comparison and the final draft for an Interlocal A~reement between the City of Federal Way and Okanogan County. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act as governed by RCW Chapter 39.34.080, the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with Okanogan County for the purpose of providing the City of Federal Way with adequate facilities and personnel for the lodging and processing of persons placed under arrest by the City and to establish a basis for identifying and distributing costs and responsibilities to each party. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions by which Okanogan County will provide Federal Way Department of Public Safety a place of conf'mement for the incarceration of one or more inmates lawfully committed to its custody, as well as compensation mutually agreed upon by both County and City for said services. These rates will be in effect through December 31, 2000 and will increase annually on the first of each calendar year based on the cost of living. The term set forth will be for five (5) years with the option to renew until terminated by written notice received ninety(90) days prior to the termination date. This Agreement also outlines other specific concerns relevant to mutual expectations and responsibilities. With the estimated 40% increase to the King County Jail billings over the past 18 months, the Department is exploring several proactive approaches to reduce jail costs. The benefits realized by this new venture would afford Federal Way an opportunity to build a favorable relationship between the Department of Public Safety and Okanogan County and allow the Department to obtain one of the jail cost objectives. At the present, the County contracts with several other jurisdictions throughout Washington State. The County will provide medical services as needed. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the August 7, 2000, meeting the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee Meeting recommended that the proposed Okanogan County Interlocal Agreement be forwarded to City Council for consideration. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to authorize~he City Manager to si~n the a~reement. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: COUNCIL BILL # APPROVED 1 st Reading DENIED Enactment Reading TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Item 5C CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Date: August 7, 2000 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Thomas J. Chancy, Sr., Interim Chief of Police Via: David ~~l~Manager Subject: County of Okanogan Jail Interlocal Agreement Background: Pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act as governed by RCW Chapter 39.34.080, the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with Okanogan County for the purpose of providing the City of Federal Way with adequate facilities and personnel for the lodging and processingofpersons placed under arrest by the City and to establish a basis for identifying and distributing costs and responsibilities to each party. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions by which Okanogan County will provide Federal Way Department of Public Safety a place of confinement for the incarceration of one or more inmates lawfully committed to its custody, as well as compensation mutually agreed upon by both County and City for said services. These rates will be in effect through December 31, 2000 and will increase annually on the first of each calendar year based on the cost of living. The term set forth will be for five (5) years with the option to renew until terminated by written notice received ninety (90) days prior to the termination date. This Agreement also outlines other specific concerns relevant to mutual expectations and responsibilities. With the estimated 40% increase to the King County Jail billings over the past 18 months, the Department is exploring several proactive approaches to reduce jail costs. The benefits realized by this new venture would afford Federal Way an opportunity to build a favorable relationshipbetween the Department of Public Safety and Okanogan County and allow the Department to obtain one of the jail cost objectives. At the present, the County contracts with several other jurisdictions throughout Washington -State. The County will provide medical services as needed. Attached is the final draft for an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and Okanogan County. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Federal Way and the Okanogan County for the housing of inmates. UI A I IR A IMR/ A C, FND A /P~ICiRf~TCi(I/(3~ A Nlr3~ n *',J Attachment "A" At the request of the Public Safety Committee, the following comparison information is offered to the City Council for their review during the consideration of the jail contracts with both Chelan County and Okanogan County for housing of"post conviction misdemeanor violators." The data used for comparison was actual misdemeanor maintenance days from the Regional Justice Center for the first six months of 2000 and projecting that 35% of the total maintenance days was for "long term commitments." JAIL COST COMPARISONS FOR LONG TERM SENTENCING King County * N/A $281,045.28 $281,045.28 _N/A Chelan County -0- $192,805.20 $192,805.20 $88,240.08 or 31% Okanogan County $8,904 $151,951.10 $160,855.10 $120,190.18 or 57% · No charge if subject was originally booked into King County jail facility. This data represents significant savings could have occurred, assuming the long term sentencing amounted to 35% of the total misdemeanor maintenance days, for the first six months of 2000 through either of the eastern Washington county jail contracts. Therefore, I believe it would be beneficial for the City to enter into these jail contracts with both Chelan and Okanogan Counties. Cost projections obtained from the report completed by Administrative Commander Coulombe, utilizing RJC billing information and contract rates from Chelan and Okanogan Counties. Copy of Commander Coulombe's report attached. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION MEMORANDUM Deputy Chief Brian Wilson _..."'" ~1Iq TO: FROM: Daniel J. Coulombe, Administrative Commander ~ 0 Lo DATE: August 16th, 2000 SUBJECT: Misdemeanor Jail Rate Comparison During the first six months of 2000, the Federal Way Department of Public SafetY has conducted 1272 Misdemeanor bookings into King County, and 9837 Misdemeanor Maintenance days of incarceration. The cost of booking is $137.65 each, and each maintenance day is $63.83. The total cost for these bookings is $175,090.80, and $627,895.71 for maintenance, for a grand total of $802,986.51 for Misdemeanor charges in the first six months of 2000. If the same number of bookings and maintenance days were experienced using the proposed contract with Okanogan County, the booking fee would be $20.00 per person or a total of $25,440.00, the maintenance fee would be $42.00 daily, or $434,146.00, for a grand total of $459,586.00. Using the same totals and applying the conditions of the Chelan Country contract, there would be no fee for booking, $56.00 maintenance fee for males, and $60.00 for women, totaling $550,888.00 for the maimenance days. AUG--29--00 10:2~ AM P. 02 INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENT JAIL SERVICES AGREEMENT Tills INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), made and entered into this day o1' -------_. , 2000, by and between the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, and the COUNTY OF OKANOGAN, both municipal corporations of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to respectively, as the "CITY" and the "COUNTY". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, thc COUNTY is performing jail services for Okanogan County and several other jurisdictions throughout Washington State, and, WHEREAS. the lnterlocal Cooperative Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW. provides that one municipal corporation may contract with another municipal corporation for such services; NOW. THEREFORE. the CITY and the COUNTY agree as follows: Section l- Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is as follows: A. To insure that there is available to the CITY, facilities and personnel for the lodging and processing the CITY's inmates in accordance with state and federal laws. B.To assist thc CITY by providing facilities adequate to detain and process persons placed trader arrest by the CITY. C. To establish a basis for identifying and distributing costs and responsibilities to each party. Section II- Glossary of Terms: CITY - Shall mean the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, Washington COUNTY - Shall mean OKANOGAN COUNTY, Washington COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - Shall mean the Board of Okanogan County Commissioners Section 111 - Services: Thc COt/NTY agrees to lodge prisoners placed in the custody of its jail, by an officer of the CITY. Interlocal Agreement between {.')km~ugan CounD'/Clty of Federal Way Page ! 08/08/00 AU~--29--00 10:24 'AM P. 05 General Provisions: The CITY agrees to make payment to the COUNTY for each and every CITY prisoner incarcerated in Okanogan County Jail. For all prisoners, the CITY shall pay a fiat rate of TWENTY DOLl,ARS ($20.00) per prisoner, as compensation for booking expenses. !. For any prisoner who is detained in excess of six (6) hours, the CITY shall make additional payment in the amount of FORTY TWO DOLLARS ($42.00) per day, 2. These rates will be in effect through December 31, 2000. The rate will increase annually on the first of each calendar year based on the cost of living. 3. The COUNTY agrees to provide detailed monthly billing statements containing thc inmate's name, case/citation number, date and time of incarceration and date and time ofrelease. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the COUNTY reserves the rights of management including setting of rules and general operating procedures/'or the jail. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that payment will be made for this s~rviee within thirty (30) days of presentation by the COUNTY of a proper invoice in the same or substantially similar from as that marked "Appendix A" attached hereto and by reference included herein. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that this Agreement shall be for a period of five (5) years, with the option to renew. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon a ninety (90) day written notice to the other. This Agreement may be modified, in writing, upon mutual consent of both parties to the Agreement. All increases in the amount to be paid by the CITY for services provided by this Agreement, other than the cost of liWng increases as set by the Washington State Office o/. Financial Management, will be by negotiations prior to Agreement termination. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto their successors and assigns. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that in the event of a dispute or controversy as to any part of this Agreement, such dispute or controversy shall be submitted to the arbitration of two (2) disinterested and competent persons, one to be chosen by the COUNTY and one to be chosen by the CITY, and the two persons so chosen shall select a third disinterested and competent person, and the decision of the three shall be conclusive and binding on both parties to the dispute. rr Is UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the COUNTY shall furnish to the CITY all jail medical, dental, and health care services required pursuant to all state and/or federal laws promulgated thereto, including such standards' as may be adopted by the Washington State Corrections Standards Board. These services would include hospitalization, prescription medications, surgical and dental care. The COUNTY agrees to notify the CITY's Public Safety Department Watch Commander at (253) 661-4600 of any major medical expense reasonably foreseen, and the CITY shall have the option to retake the ill or injured inmate and provide other tre~tment. Itl en~ergency situations, the COUNTY will take appropriate and necessary action to lnterlocal Agreement between Okanogan County/City of Federal Way Page 2 08/08/00 AU~--29--00 10:24 AM P. 04 provide emergency medical care and notify the CITY as soon as possible. The COt. fiXITY agrees to assist the CITY in avoiding these major medical expenses when possible, as they would their own prisoner population. It is understood that the County provides regular services to prisoners inside the jail. The County agrees to provide and pay for thol;e medical services to City inmates, excluding prescriptions, at no cost to the City. The City agrees to pay the County for any non- regular medical services provided or administered to City inmates outside of the jail, and to pay for prescriptions and/or dental care provided to inmates of the CITY housed under this Agreement. A detailed record of all medical services, prescriptions and dental care for which the County believes the City must pay, shall be kept by the COUNTY for the CITY's review at its request, Any medical or dental services of major consequence shall be reported to the CITY as soon as time ~rmits. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGRI~ED that the COUNTY has the right to refuse acceptance or entrance to the jail of any CITY arrestee who is obviou~;ly immediately in need of emergency medical or mental health treatment until proper treatment is provided. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that the COUNTY will make every attempt to accept prisoners from the CITY subject to booking restrictions reasonably applied to all agencies uniformly. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that it is the responsibility of the CITY to transport the CITY's arrestees to the Okanogan County Jail and to comply with all jail booking requirements; provided, however, that the COUNTY will transport all CITY prisoners from the King County Correctional Facility, 500 5th Avenue, Seattle, WA, and/or fi`om the R.egional Justice Center, 401 4th Avenue N., Kent, WA to the Okanogan County Jail for a fee of 32,5 cents per mile (2000 Standard Mileage Rate) (based on an average 238 mile round trip) per trip, regardless of the number of prisoners transported. The CITY's Police Department agrees to confirm bed space availability and transport requests at least three (3) days prior to the requested date. Each party agrees to aid ,and assist the other in accomplishing the objections ,of this Agreement. The COUNTY will assume the liability for the custody and care of Federal Way prisoners once they are in the custody of the COUNTY, specifically including prisoners being transported by COUNTY employees, agents, or contracts. The COUNTY shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the CITY, Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of tho COUNTY and the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the COUNTY's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the COUNTY's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the COUNTY's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of'this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Intcrlt'~cnl Agreement between Okanognn County/City of Federal Way Page 3 0R/08/00 AU~--29--00 10:25 AM P. 05 The parties intend that an independent contractor/COUNTY relationship will be created by this Agreemenl. No agent, employee, servant or representative of the CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agency, servant or representative of the COUNTY for any purpose; employees of the CITY are not entitled to any of the benefits the COUNTY provides for COUNTY employees. Thc COU'NTY shall not discriminate against any employees, inmates or applicants for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin. The COUNTY shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and employees are treated during emplayment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, age or national origin. Such action shall include, but not limited 1o the following: employment, upgrading, demotions or terminations, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, selection for training including apprenticeship, and participation in recreational and education activities. The COUNTY agrees to post, in a conspicuous place available to employees and applicants for employment, notices idenlieal to those used setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. In all solicilations or advertisements for employees placed by the COUNTY, or on their behalf, the COUNTY shall state that all qualified applicants will receive considenltlon for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin. IN WI]NESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OKANOGAN, WASHINGTON David H. Moseley, City Manager Dave Schulz, Chm~an 33530 First Way S. Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 661-4013 ATI'EST: N. Christine Green, CMC, City Clerk Inlcrlocnl Agreement hetwecn Okanogan County/City ot~ Federal Way Page 4 08/08/00 AUG--29--00 10 :25 AM P. 06 [/APPROVED AS TO FORM: D-On L. ~r~on, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecutor A~EST: ~mn~ J, ~ite, Clerk of the Bo~d / K:Xlnterlcl~ail Se~ices Agmt Ok~og~ Coun~2.doc I lntertocal Agreement between Oka~ogan County/City of Federal Way Page 5 08/o8/00 MEETING DATE: September 5, 2000 ITEM# ~~_.~ · CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: SCA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR 2000 FOR ESA SUPPORT X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT ExpenditureAmt: $ BUSINESS ~ PROCLAMATION ContingencyReqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee dated July 21,2000. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: As previously reported to the Council the Suburban Cities Association (SCA) has been following the development of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance standards making process at the Tricounty Steering Committee, and that a special assessment will be billed to each member city for the consultants retained to provide this service. The City has received an invoice in the amount of $7,691 based on the $0.10 per capita amount approved by the city manager's group and the Board of Directors at the SCA. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its July 25, 2000 meeting, the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee forwarded to full Council to recommend their approval of the special ESA assessment in the amount of $7,691 to the Suburban Cities Association. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve payment to the Suburban Cities Association in the amount of $7,691. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED 1st Reading TABLEDfDEFERRED/NOACTION Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CCCOVER-5/24/94 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: July 21, 2000 To: Finance, Economi~c Dev~opment and Regional Affairs Committee Via: David H. Moseqe~l't~ Manager From: Iwen Wang, Management Services Director ~,(.~L) Subject: ESA Special Assessment As previously reported to the Council, the Suburban Cities Association (SCA) has been following the development of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance standards making process at the Tricounty Steering Committee, and that a special assessment will be billed to each member city for the consultants retained to provide this service. The City has received an invoice in the amount of $7,691 based on the $0.10 per capita amount approved by the city manager's group and the Board of Directors at the SCA. This assessment will cover consultant services to review and track the development and proposals being discussed at the Tricounty. While the specific work plan has not been finalized, the intention is to have the consultant track and report Tricounty activities including the urban blueprint plank development through this fall. This amount is not budgeted. However, the position savings generated from the hiring freeze will more than cover this expenditure and no additional appropriation will be needed. Staff recommends Council approve the special assessment and authorize its payment. Attachment: SCA staff report to its board of directors on the assessment. Committee Recommendation: Forward the item to full Council and recommend their approval of the special ESA assessment in the amount of $7,691 to the Suburban Cities Association. 7/21/2000 JUN 29 'DO i1:00 FROM:SUBURBAN CITIES +2062363588 T-O02 P.OZ F-665 81 A FOR THE BOARD OF DXRECTORS STAFF REPORT ]:N SUPPORT OF Mo'rzON Deb May :1,7, 2000 issue: Shall the Board of Directors approve an assessment of the membership in support of consulting staff support for F. SA issues? Backomund and status: Back in Harch/Aprii, after discussion with the city managers, we contracted for consultant services, primarily to review and track the management zone and stormwater proposals being discussed at the Tricounty. Perhaps as importantly, we directed these consultant to attend and observe negotiating team meetings and negotiating sessions w/NMF$/U$~-WS anti to report back on the general tenor of these session. Written and oral work product has been received (written reports have been dlstrlbutecl to the cities and are available for review) and is satisfactory. Total services for this first work order is about $10,000. Although eib/managers indicated that they had funds available to pay for ESA-related expanses, no assessment or Invoice can be sent un'all the Bosrd has Qctgd on it. Staff has indicated to you throughout that we would let you know when action was needed; that time has come. At a minimum, you need to approve an assessment in the amount of the first work order, so that we can bill the cities for the work done to date. Ideally, you will address the question of ongoing staff support for tracking and reporting on the Tricounty activities and negouaclons, and choose an assessment option as described below. Both consultant~, ABHL, inc. (r4ichael Katterman) for management zone and Ear~mch (Rich Schaeffer) for s~rmwater are on hold, pending your decision. A calendar of meetings of NHFS/USFWS with Tricounb/representatives, and of Tricounty negotiating team meetings, is attached. Also attached are lists of the other participants, including significant staff representing SeatIle and Bellevue. You may, of course, choose to rely on those staff for l'unneling InformaUon to our staff, and thus to our electeds. Discussion of rationale for an additional assesmnent: The Tricounty Steering Committee's work, although important to the cities, is now understnocl as only one of several compliance options. This raises the question of why JUN 29 '00 11:00 FROM:SUBURBAN CITIES +ZO62363588 T-OOZ P.03/11 F-665 we should continue to track the Trlcounty activities and to incur expenses in that' activity. 5omc reasons are: · The cities lobbied for and received representations, at the Trlcounty Steering Committee (Clark/Springer). Having received that representation, you need to adequately staff it, including staff representation at the negotiation team meetings and negotiations. · Any single city's staff cannot assume the responsibility for tracking or reporting on Tricounty 4(d) planks on behalf of all cities, due to lack of time and resources. Both Katterman and 5~aerer have been Invited to the table on your dues' behalf and have partidpated in discussions. · Planks established in the 4(d) rule may not be absolute, but they may indeed establish a ``benchmarld or "baseline" against which your efforts will be measured. This will be important in any sul:~-,quent defense of your cities' actions. Thus, it is in the dues interest to make sum that these planks am as reasonable as possible. · Tricounty continues to engage the other stakeholders, such as the business community, tribes, dvic and environmental groups. Until such time as the WR[A 9roup~ may replace this stakeholder involvement function, the Trlcounty is the primary regional contact for these groups. · The Tricounb/is our region's primary contact wll~ NMF$/USFW$ and likely to remain so, if for no other reason than the Sendces do not have sufficient staff to meet all requests. The Tricounb/is also the place where state and federal attention is focused right not, for budget and grant purposes. · Understanding the Tricounty planks may assist any db/or group of dries in taking advantage of any subsequent negotiations for an incidental take permit; or HCP under Section 10. · The Tricounty continues to offer opportunity for 'protection" by proposed programmatic approvals, if those programs turn out to be reasonable, benefldal, implementable and cost effective (among other things). · Estimated cost of implementation of the Tricounys three current planks -roads maintenance, stormwater and management zone - is estimated to be anywhere from $:1.84 to $27.67 per capita annually.' The range of estimates indicates, among other things, the enormous uncertainty now embodied in this rule. Even at the $0.15 per capital plans. In equity tP. JTns, also ~ that other dries have borne substanl~l ~osts for projects from which you will benefit~ including the sepamm ~Ds~s undena~ by tt~ Ports and their dues t~ ~ up with an urban ma~jement zone counl~prOlx~sal or tt~ larger city groups' effort to reach NMFSAISPWS some other way (the "urban btuep~nt" ixoposal~. JUN 29 '00 11:00 FROM:SUBURBAN CITIES +2062363588 T-O02 P.04/!1 F-665 capita rate for consulting support, your in~t in tracking and reporting of the Tricounty issues poles in comparison ~ the expenses at rlsl~ Option~; The Board can: · Authorize an assessment sufficient to cover the expenditures to date (about 4;10,0oo). Decline to authorize a further ass~_ment, putting the consultants' tracking and reporting acUvitles in abeyance. · Authorize an assessment at the $0.10 or $0.15 per capita rate, with an intention to cover consultant'tracklng' and reporting of Tdcounty activities, including backing the urban blue~nt plank development, through the fall. (Zf the Board chooses this option, it should include a requirement that Eddy/Covington development a more specific scope of work, in conjunction with Oark/Sprinoer.) · Decline to authorize any assessment, choosing to use available cash to pay for the services rendered to date. Attachment~: ESA Potential Assessment Table Recent Trlcounty calendar NMFS/USPW$ Tricounty Negotiations Roster Tricounty Organizational Chart JUN Z9 '00 11:01 FROI,t:SUBURBAN CITIES +ZO6Z363588 T-OOZ P.06/11 F-665 iSuburban cities Association . , Year 2000 Possible Assessment for ESA Support and Consultant Services Rate at: Rate at: Rate at: City .......... - ..... Population" $ 0.05 $ 0.10 '$ ..... 0,16 Algona 2,11 o!$105.50 $211.00 $316.50 Auburn .......... 38,980 $1,949.00 $3,89(~00 $5,847.o0 Beau Arts Village 289 $14.45 $28.90 $43.35__. Black Diamond 3,825 $191.25 $382.50 $573.75 Bothell 14,500 $725.00 $~,450.00 $2,175.00._ Burien 29,770 $1,488.50 $2,977.00 $4,465.50 Carnation .......... 1,785 $89.25 ' ' $178.50 '- $267.75 Clyde Hill 2,883 $144.15 $288.30 $432.45 Covington ..... 13,010 ~50.50 $1,301.00 $1,951._.5_0_ 'Es Moine~ ...... 27,180 $1,358.00 $2,716.00 $4,074.00 Duval~'---- 4,435 $221.75 $443.50 $665.25 Enumclaw ...........10,740 $537.00 ~1~074.00 $1,611.00 76,910 $3,845.50 $7,691.00 $11,536.50 Federal Way ....... Hunts Point 472 $23.60 $47.20 $70180 Issaquah -- 10,130 $506.50 ~ $1,013.00 ...__$..1.;519-.~'~- Kenmore .... '¥~', 168 $868.40 Ii;1,716,80 $2,676.20 Kent 73,060 $3,653, O0 $7,306.00 $10,959.00 KJrkland ....... 44,8§0 $2,243.00 $4,46§.oo $5,729.00 Lake Forest Park 13,040~ $652.(~- -- $1,304.00 $1,-'~56.00 U a pl_.e. _V..a. II_e.y~ _ 12,540, $627.00 $1,254.00 $1,881.00 Medina 2,940: $147,00 $294.00 $441.00 Merce~-Isl-and 21,570 $1,078.50 $2,157-.00 '--- $3,235.50 Milton 896 $44.76 seg.6b $434.28 Newcastle .... ~'~60'"'~ ~ $430.25 $860.50 $1,290.75 Normancly Park .... .~.'.~. 7,O35 $351.75 $703.50 $1,055.25 North Bend 3,815 $190.75 $381.50 $572.25 Pacific 5,470 $273.50 $547.00 ....... $820.50 Redmond 43,610 $2,180,50 $4,361.00 $6,641.50__ Renton ....'"~7,620 ...... $2,38~;1.00- $4,762.00 .... $7,143.00 Samammlsh :29,400 $1,470.00 $2,040.00 $4,410.00 SeaTac ........ 23,570 $1,178.5.0_ .... $2,357.00 $3,535.50 Srtorellne 52,030 $2,801.50 $5,203.00 ....... $7,804.50 Skykomish 275 $13.75 $27.50 ..._ $41.25 Snoqu almie 1,980 $99.00 $198.00 $297.00 Tukwila 14,840 $742.00 $1,484.00 $2,226.00 Woodinville 10,250 $512.50 $1,025.00 $1,537.50 Yarrow Point 980 $49.00 $98.00 $147.O0 Total ........ 672,662 $33,627.60 $6~,266.20 $100,882.80 '1999 OFNI Pop~ Prepared 416/00 FOr City Managem Meeting JUN Z9 '00 !1:01 FROM:SUBURBAN CITIES +ZO6Z363588 T-OOZ P.06/11 F-665 JUN Z9 '00 11:0Z FROM:SUBURBAN CITIES +ZO6Z363588 T-OOZ P.07/11 F-665 JUN 29 '00 11:02 FI~A:SUBURB~ CITIES +2062363688 T-OOZ P.08/11 F-665 NMFS/USFWS/TRI COUNTY ROSTER .... *'"'~ ...... ':':"""' ...... ::" "" .... ' "' ]~nn~. Ali~ ¢it~ Thompson, Tom O T H i-[elland~ Carol City of B~'vue Eva~ Dan - O T H C_h-,,dh', 9ob .Seattle Public Utilities He~e, kl, ~ ~e~ttle IX:LU ~ Por~_ .an~ Cliff Seattle DCLU Turner, Bob --- Noble, Jud/th ~enttle Public Ufilites 't~=o~ ~.]int=~ Binns. Mar~/~h Seattl~ DCLU Kirk'patrick, DeeAnn- Sncha, Leslie Seattle Pu~.~.lic Utilities Furfey, Rosemary K/m, Jack/e .. KC- ESA Of~ee . -- Sames~ G.I. K..C Exec. ..... P.,e/nert, Hnrry King Co. DD£S usFws ~hn, Lind~,v . ~ Co. Micha~l~,'ftm Nichola~ Steve King Co. DNR $ca~dJ,'Caroly~ M~t~n'~_. ~t ~]kTalO KC ES..A Chnn, Jeff ~ And]t KC PAO .... Katich, Petm' Cit~ of Tacema Craig. Scott _TILl COUNTY i~OLICY _~-~_4d~ Gilmur, Dick 'pm't of Ta~0ma l, Jc~fi snohamish County Bunney,_Sha _wn Pim'ce C?.: Hai~ Don Ci~ oi~Evn'm Stndx~, Skip Pierce Co. Williams, Terry ~ Tn"om ~-~dl~, Ru~ Pu3qfllup Tn~, ._. Baker,' Ma~ht City of Seattle Thom&st Jeffrey" Pu~allup Tribe Wan'm, Lloyd City of Bellevue _ Thomps~n~ Janet WA ~ l~ology Ceis, Tim King Count,/ Wellst Steve WA CTED st~,~.~. Ch=~i' ' MtTc~4=h~ ?n~ ,,, WA ~..WqA? Lorlxr/r~ Judith .City of Taccsna Ban~u'd~ Jane WA DFW Hyde, 1~ Pim'ce County Crull~ John ' '~The Bo~nS ,Cc~n, party Troutt, David Nisquall~ Tfil~ Ernst, Will The Bodn~ c0~n_ 'pany _ Pu~ilup Tn~ Johns~ .Bpb ' - Mastn' Builders Moody~ Lloyd Gov. Sn!mon Team _F~__anz, HihrY ... Master Builders Waitc, Tom The ...i~-ing Company _ Ashtm, Kelly Master l~ild~r~ . .An. dn~on~ Snm MtsMr Buildess Haa~lm'ove, Seott ~ W.~. l~t~iness __ Wki~ Jacques. Peoplc.for PuRet ~nd Buehler, Jonnns 'Save Lk/.S~nanamiSh Graul~n...an, ....Dana Pt~chuck Audubon Espcnhotst, Eric Fr/ends of the Earth Moa-~hn~d, ~ . Snoh~dsh Co. Dicks, David G T H.. snohomish Co. x _,~ott=, Mart C~ R~rdon, A~r.. on C~ of Everett Williams, Daryl Tulalip Trilx~s _ JUN Z9 '00 11:0Z FROM:SUBURBAN CITIES +Z06Z363588 T-00Z P.09/11 F-665 NMFS<~~u~' NEGOTIATIONS ON HCP$, ETC. i JSNOHOMISH TriCounty IC UNTY Commi oou I BUSINE~ ~TION TRIBES [ E~IRO GROUPS COUN ~ JW~ ~0 ' Sn~ualmle ~ation - B Pa~ ~ lc R~, DWl~ EDV~N ~Algona R ~ 8noqualmle - R FI~, M ~Pa¢~c ~ ~s K~ch ~Ml~n u BU~~ No~ ~nd J Gl~~e. M ~liE~ L ST~ I' ~ke W~h Forum ]' Samm Forum I~ [T~ni~ ~m~a~ ~NG CO -Philli~ ]F~ ~i~ ~m~ 5~E - P~/s ~D~ a ~ KING ~ - P~ BELL~E - M~i A ~, L W~, n S~LE M P~IS ~~, J ~ Ronton - J Tan~rl J ~TON, G ~~, R UND R~ - a T~/J ~T~, G R~mond - R Iv~/J sP~ T ~H~ ~~, R U~D Ki~land - L Sp~n~l J ~, P Y~NG K~t - T Ci~ D WI~TROM, B ~aquah - A F~r Auburn - C ~ o ~Y I ~th.ll - M ~ s ~~ Tu~ila - S Muil~ J Clyde ~tll - P N~n~* ~ IIITl~ - J ~~'D ~ ledin. - P ~~, D ~1 o ~, c Bu~IS Burn - S L~rl S ~ s ~ ~auz A~ ~ ~o Mapla Valley & I~i~ o ~D, a ST~ 4unto Point - F ~k~, T Fm~ ~ F~eml Way - P W~n~ ~ ~, c ~, o ~ CovlnE~n - R Qa~ H ~. P ~NS Maple Valley L I~i~ G SUND, J ST~D Maple Vall~ ~ke Fo~t Pa~ D H~in~n ~ P~N Enu~l~ - / K ~er Mlnnd = J Cli~ 6 ~CHER, R ~T Bla=k DMmond ~ P~ N~le - J ~r/K ~ss. M N~. A T~TA Algon~ - R ~ Shoreline - R Gun. n, K ~~ESE ~an~ Pa~ s ~ ~mmmiuh - K H~I ~ Moln~ - S T~W L ~N~ Wo~invill. - B S~ ~ ~ Ya~w Point - J ~ ~ - CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM stricT: DOL Interlocal Agreement CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ N/A ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ N/A BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ -0- HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: PRHSPS Committee Report SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: See attached PRHSPS Committee Report CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve interloeal a~'xnent CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve interlocal agreement APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ~~ (BELOW TO BE CO3,1PLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED 1st Reading TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # l:~bil FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Date: July 28, 2000 Via: David H. Mo~~anager From: Sandra M. Wafter, Court Administrator Item: Department of Licensing Inter-agency agreement Background: This agreement will allow court staff a direct link to the Department of Licensing This will allow court staff to access the vehicle registration information database to confirm registered owners of vehicles that have received citations. This will allow us to notify th_e .. registered owner of the citation and proceed with collections if needed. Per section 5.0 Payments - There shall be no fees charged to Federal Way Municipal Court by DOL. Committee Recommendation: The staff recommends the adoption of these Inter-local agreements with the Department of Licensing. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON STATE DR/kFT DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING FEDEI~AL ~WAY MUNICIPAL COURT Contract No. 00 IL 00/5243 Date: June 1, 2000 THIS INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Washington State Department of Licensing, hereinafter referred to as "DOL", Highways- Licenses Building, 1125 Washington Street Southeast, Olympia Washington and the Federal Way Municipal Court, hereinafter referred to as "FWMC", 34004 9th Avenue South, Building A-2, Federal Way, Washington, pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 39.34 RCW, RCW 46.12.370, RCW 46.12.380 and RCW 46.16.216. Section 1.0 PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT The purpose of this agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions under which DOL will provide to FWMC Internet access to DOL's vehicle license records. This agreement supersedes any other previous agreements, known or unknown, made between DOL and FWMC for this service. Section 2.0 STATEMENT OF WORK 2.1 DOL will provide FWMC with online or Intemet access to DOL's motor vehicle database. FWMC will not add or alter any information on the motor vehicle database. Aside from preventative maintenance and database updates, the system will be available for record access twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. 2.2 DOL will provide as a minimum the following motor vehicle database information to FWMC's workstation: License Plate Number Power/Use Class Vehicle Identification Number Title Transfer Date Registration Expiration Date County/Agent Number License Plate Issue Date Title Number Vehicle Make Report of Sale Date Vehicle Model Value Code/Year Model Year Gross Weight Registered Owner Name(s) Scale Weight Registered Owner Address Tonnage Fees Registered Owner City, State and ZIP Remarks Total Fees Paid (last transaction only) 2.3 FWMC shall use the information provided by DOL pursuant to this agreement only for identifying registered owner information in conjunction with the issuance and adjudication of parking citations. FWMC agrees to protect the confidentiality of the information and data to which FWMC has access under this agreement. All vehicle records obtained through this agreement shall be used by FWMC's personnel only. FWMC or any of its employees or agents shall not furnish to any person, association, or organization outside the criminal or civil justice system, a copy of any record, or any part thereof, released by DOL to FWMC under this agreement, for any reason, without the written consent of DOL. 2:4 FWMC and its employees or agents shall ensure the confidentiality of motor vehicle records by protecting account numbers and passwords; by using hard to guess passwords; changing passwords at least every ninety days, particularly when there are changes in personnel; instituting penalties for misuse of data; and assuring that employees are familiar with the provisions of this contract. 2.5 DOL may audit the use of the information provided by DOL, and the effectiveness of the access controls implemented by FWMC. 2.6 FWMC shall adhere to any current or future statutory or administrative roles regulating the right to privacy and confidentiality, which relate to such information. 2.7 All exceptions to the above must be approved in writing by DOL, setting out any limitations or conditions to which the approval is subject. Such written approval must be received by FWMC prior to the requested use of, or " release of, the information that is the subject of the exception. Section 3.0 DISCLOSURE OF INDIVIDUAL NAMES AND ADDRESSES PROHIBITED 3.1 No name or address of any individual owner furnished by DOL to FWMC shall be disclosed or published by FWMC in any manner, or be used for mailing purposes. B.2 FWMC shall not use or furnish to any person, corporation, partnership, association or organization of any kind for any commercial purpose by itself or by any other entity any of the individual owner names or address information, or part thereof, provided by DOL under this agreement for the purpose of making any unsolicited business contact with the individuals named therein. The term unsolicited business contact means a contact that is intended to result in, or promote the sale of any goods or services to a person named in the disclosed information. This subsection shall not prevent FWMC from requesting additional specific exceptions from this section 2 from DOL, subject to prior written approval of, and any conditions imposed by, DOL. No exceptions shall be valid unless approved in writing by the Director of DOL accompanied by a statement of conditions, if any, imposed on such approval, prior to the intended use of the information which is the subject of the exception. 3.3 FWMC is responsible to ensure that any name or address released under this agreement is used only for the purpose specified in Subsection 2.3 of this agreement. Section 4.0 PROPRIETARY RIGHTS FWMC shall not acquire any proprietary rights in the information received under this agreement which will in any manner restrict DOL's use and dissemination of the same information. Section 5.0 PAYMENTS 5.1 There shall be no fees charged to FWMC by DOL for services provided in Section 2 above. Funds for this service are provided by RCW 46.16.216. 5.2 Any costs imposed in this subsection shall be subject to a change in the agreement as provided in Section 19 herein. Section 6.0 LIMITATION UPON ASSIGNMENT This agreement is not assignable by either party. Section 7.0 INDEMNIFICATION FWMC agrees to, and shall, indemnify and hold harmless the state of Washington, DOL, the director and all DOL employees from any and all suits at law or equity, and from any and all claims, demands or loss of any nature, including but not limited to all costs and attorney fees, arising from any incorrect or improper disclosure of individual names or addresses under this agreement; any defects in any of FWMC procedures followed or omitted or arising from the failure of FWMC or its officers, employees, customers or agents to fulfill any of its obligations under this agreement; or arising in any manner from any negligent act or omission by FWMC or its officers, employees, customers or agents. Section 8.0 LIMITATION ON TIlE STATE'S LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY 8.1. The parties agree that in no event shall the State of Washington, DOL, the Director of DOL or any DOL employees, be liable to the City of Federal Way for any damages, costs, lost production, or any other loss of any kind for failure of DOL's equipment, hardware or software to perform for any 3 reason, or for the loss of consequential damage which is the result of acts of God, strikes, lockouts, riots, acts of war, epidemics, acts of fire, failure of communications or computer equipment, facilities, or software, power failures, nuclear accidents or other disasters. 8.2 The State of Washington, DOL, the Director of DOL or any DOL employee shall not be liable for any claim of any nature against The City of Federal Way by any party arising fi.om any failure in the service fitmished by DOL under this agreement, for any errors, mistakes or acts on the part of DOL or its agents which result in the failure to properly release vehicle title interests; for any failure of DOL's equipment or software which fails to perform for any reason or for any other loss or consequential damage which is a result of acts of God, strikes, lockouts, riots, acts of war, epidemics, acts of fire, failure of communications or computer equipment, facilities, or software, power failures, nuclear accidents or other disasters. 8.3 DOL shall not be liable for any delays in furnishing the information under this agreement nor shall DOL be liable for any errors which occur in compilation of the information. Section 9.0 NONDISCRIMINATION During the terms of this agreement, the parties hereto agree to comply with the following nondiscrimination requirements as well as applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations governing equal employment opportunity: No party shall, on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, age, sensory, mental or physical handicap or political affiliation, discriminate against or deny employment as a participant or staff person in connection with any function related to this agreement or to be performed in connection therewith. Section 10.0 TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated by either party upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other party; provided that, either party may terminate the agreement immediately for breach by the other party of any of its obligations under this agreement. Any violation of the restrictions, conditions or requirements contained in this agreement constitute grounds for DOL to terminate this agreement immediately. Notice of termination shall be conclusively deemed to have been delivered to, and received by, the other party as of midnight of the third day following the date of its posting in the United States mail, addressed as provided in Section 11 of this agreement, in the absence of actual delivery to and receipt by the party by mail or other means at an earlier date and/or time. 4 Section 11.0 NOTICES All notices conceming this contract shall be sent to the parties or their successors at the addresses stated below: DOL- Contract Manager, Title and Registration Services, Department of Licensing, Post Office Box 2957, Olympia, Washington 98507-2957. FWMC - Court Administrator, Federal Way Municipal Court, 34004 9th Avenue South, Building A-2, Federal Way, Washington 98003. SeCtion 12.0 PAYMENT IN THE EVENT OF TERMINATION In the event this agreement is terminated by either party without fault on the part of the other party, each party shall be liable for the actual cost they have incurred during their performance under this agreement and neither party shall be obligated to the other party for such cost; except that all fees owed by FWMC to DOL shall continue to be due and payable as provided in Section 5. Section 13.0 OWNERSHIP OF EQUIPMENT AND soFrWARE All equipment and soft:ware furnished by DOL or by FWMC shall remain the property of the firmishing party and the party shall retain full title and all rights associated with ownership. The equipment shall not become fixtures. Neither party shall encumber, or permit an encumbrance upon, the other parties title to the equipment or software, or to the equipment or software itself, in any manner. Section 14.0 DISPUTES In the event of a dispute between the parties arising under this agreement, which the parties themselves cannot resolve, the dispute shall be referred to a disputes panel. The panel shall consist of one member appointed by the Director of DOL, one member appointed by FWMC, and one member jointly selected by both parties. The decision of the panel shall be final and binding upon the parties, unless the decision of the panel requires either party to perform an illegal act. In the event the panel cannot resolve a dispute, the aggrieved party may file a lawsuit. Venue of any lawsuit filed by any party against the other party arising in whole or in part out of this agreement shall be in the Superior Court for Thurston County in Olympia, Washington. Section 15.0 INDEPENDENT STATUS OF DOL DOL and DOL employees and agents shall perform all duties pursuant to this agreement as an independent agency from FWMC and not in any manner as officers, agents or employees of FWMC. All references in this agreement to DOL shall include its agents and employees. FWMC shall not withhold or pay any taxes or insurance or deductions of any kind in connection with reimbursement of DOL under this agreement. This provision shall not 5 preclude DOL from representing FWMC in fulfilling tasks and services specified in this · agreement. Section 16.0 SAVINGS CLAUSE It is the belief of all parties that all provisions of this agreement are lawful. If any section of this agreement should be found to be contrary to existing law, by court decision or opinion of the Washington State Attorney General, the remainder of the agreement shall not be affected thereby, and the parties shall enter into immediate negotiations for the purpOse of arriving at a mutually satisfactory replacement of such section. The provisions of the agreement shall be subject to any future actions of or directions by the Legislature of the State of Washington. In the event of conflicts between actions of or directions of the Washington State Legislature and provisions of this agreement during its term, the former shall prevail. Section 17.0 REMEDY OF TERMINATION The remedy of termination of this agreement or release of DOL from the obligations of this agreement afforded to DOL under the various provisions of this agreement shall not be deemed to be an exclusive remedy, but rather shall be in addition to all other remedies which may be available to DOL. Termination of this agreement shall release DOL fi'om any and all obligations whatever under this agreement but shall not bar DOL from pursuing any remedies which it would otherwise have against FWMC. Section 18.0 TERM OF THE AGREEMENT This agreement shall commence on July 1, 2000 irrespective the date of final execution and shall continue until terminated by either party as provided in Section 10 of this agreement or until June 30, 2005, which ever occurs first. This agreement is void upon formal action of the state legislature enacting statutory prohibition of failure to provide funding for the performance of the duties provided herein. Section 19.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT This document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. There is no other agreement, either oral or written, upon the subject. Commitments, warranties, representations, understandings or agreements, not contained in this agreement or written amendment hereto shall not be binding on either party. Except as provided herein, no alteration of any of the terms or conditions, of this agreement will be effective without the written consent of both parties. However, this provision shall.not prevent any other effective agreements between the parties that are consistent with the provisions of this agreement. Section 20.0 SEVERABILITY If any covenant or provision of this agreement shall be adjudged void, such adjudication shall not affect the validity, obligation or performance of any other covenant or provisions, or part thereof, which in itself is valid if such remainder conforms to the terms and requirements of applicable law and the intent of this agreement. Section 21.0 RATIFICATION The execution of this contract shall constitute a ratification of that earlier verbal agreement between the parties, hereto, the terms and conditions of which are contained herein. Accordingly, the beginning date of performance under this contract will formalize and continue the service FWMC is presently receiving, regardless of the date of execution. Section 22.0 AFFIRMATION OF AGREEMENT The parties signing below hereby affirm that they have the authority to bind their respective parties to the terms and conditions of this agreement. DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL COURT BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE: DATE: DATE: MEETING DATE: September 5, 2000 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Traffic Unit Radar Reimbursements CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Memo from Interim Chief Chaney regarding the Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee recommendation and the copy of the letter received from Washington State Traffic Safety Commission. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Department of Public Safety has for the past few years participated in the "School Zone Safety Program." This program is facilitated by Washington State Traffic Safety Commission as governed by RCW Chapter 46.61.440 which states that (2) "...any infraction relating to speed restrictions within a school or playground speed zone shall be assessed a monetary penalty..." and (3) "...expenditures may only be used for funding projects in local communities to improve ~chool zone safety, pupil transportation safety, and student safety in school bus loading and unloading areas." The Department of Public Safety requests approval to accept reimbursement in the amount orS 12,310.08 from the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission for the purchase of radar equipment. The equipment consists of two (2) ProLaser III Speed measuring devices and two (2) Talon Model radar units from Kustom Signals, Inc., State Contract #10698. By mcreasing the radar units, Traffic was able to hand over spare radar units to help equip Patrol. We will request this revenue be appropriated during the 2000 year-end adjustments. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the August 7, 2000, meeting the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee Meeting recommended that the proposed Washington State Traffic Safety Commission reimbursement be forwarded to City Council for consideration. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to authorize the City Manager to accept reimbursement. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ~V~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: COUNCIL BILL # APPROVED 1st Reading DENIED Enactment Reading TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Item 5E CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Date: August 7, 2000 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Thomas J. Chancy, Sr., Interim Chief of Police Via: David M~sel~Manager Subject: Traffic Unit Radar Reimbursements Background: The Department of Public Safety has for the past few years participated in the "School Zone Safety Program." This program is facilitated by Washington State Traffic Safety Commission as governed by RCW Chapter 46.61.440 which states that (2) "... any infraction relating to speed restrictions within a school or playground speed zone shall be assessed a monetary penalty..." and (3) "...expenditures may only be used for funding projects in local communities to improve school zone safety, pupil transportation safety, and student safety in school bus loading and unloading areas. The Department of Public Safety requests approval to accept reimbursement in the amount of $12,310.08 from the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission for the purchase of radar equipment. The equipment consists of two (2) ProLaser III speed measuring devices and two (2) Talon Model radar units from Kustom Signals, Inc., State Contract #10698. By increasing the radar units, Traffic was able to hand over spare radar units to help equip Patrol. We will request this revenue be appropriated during the 2000 year-end adjustments. Attached is a copy of the letter received from Washington State Traffic Safety Commission. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept radar unit reimbursement in the amount of $12,310.08 from the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission. I/LAURA/MS/AGEN DA/PS/080700/RADAR - STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 1000 S. Cherry St., PO Box 40944 · Olympia, Washington 98504-0944 · (360) 753-6197 January 7, 2000 TO: Lt. TracY Grossnickle, Federal .Way Polic/~Dept. From: Les Pope, Senior Program Manager~/ RE: Police Equipment Grants Based on the grant request you submitted, your agency is awarded full funding to acquire Two (2) Kustom Brand, ProLaser III speed measuring devices with holsters. The cost of this unit is $3,995.00 each plus tax and shipping. The holsters are an additional $70.00 each. Further, your agency is awarded full funding to acquire Two (2) Kustom Brand, Talon Model, radar units. The cost of this unit is $1,745.00 each plus tax and shipping. These units may be purchased by calling the vendor directly at 1- - 800-835-0156. Purchase of additional accessories such as additional/different antennas, triggers, remote controls or special vehicle adapters is the responsibility of your agency. As ~vith all our equipment grants, your agency must purchase the necessary item(s) and submit for reimbursement not later than 90 days from this date. I have detailed the order/reimbursement procedure' below: l. Your agency must order the item granted and be billed for the equipment. 2. Upon receipt of a billing, your agency must submit for reimbursement using the enclosed Invoice Voucher, A 19-IA Form. Submit the voucher and a duplicate copy of your billing invoice to WTSC for reimbursement. Please note that we cannot accept a FAX. We must have: your agency identified as the "Claimant", a Federal Tax ID # and an original signature of the agency head, command officer or contracting officer on the A-19 form. 3. Upon receipt of'the above, your agency/jurisdiction will be reimbursed. Either party may terminate this agreement upon (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination of this agreement, the terminating party shall be liable for the performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination. Disputes arising under this agreement shall be resolved by a panel consisting of One representative of the Washin~on Traffic Safety Commission, one representative from your agency and a mutually agreed upon third party. The dispute panel shall thereafter decide the dispute ~vith the majority prevailing. Thank you for participating in our traffic safety improvement projects. Feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3872 if you have any questions. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: 11th Place South Drainage Improvements Project Authorization to Award Bid X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE __STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ..... 'i .... South Drainage Improvements Project, and authorized bidding the project. The tota~hproject budget is $100,000 funded by Surface Water Management Minor CIP Funds. The project bid on July 7 , 2000, utilizing the City's small works roster. Following are the seven bids received on July 7, 2000: Contractor Bid Amount Peacefield Construction $147,985.00 Pivetta Brothers $103,997.00 Americon $98,971.11 DDI Construction $90,816.95 Monarch Excavating $90,794.53 Roadway Construction $82,402.42 C A Goodman $80,401.00 Engineer's Estimate: $70,500.00 Planning and Design In house staff Bidding and Advertising $500.00 Engineer's Construction Estimate $63,636.63 10% Construction Contingency $6,363.37 Construction Management In house staff Based on the bids received, the lowest responsive bidder is C. A. Goodman in the amount of $80,401.00. In addition, two bidders, Roadway Construction and Peacefield Construction, were rendered non-responsive due to not following bidding instructions. The lowest responsive bid is higher than the engineer's estimate by $16,764.37 due to the amount of mobilization costs, traffic control, and pavement restoration the contractor included in their bid. To determine if the apparent low bidder, C. A. Goodman, is capable of performing the work, staff requested and the contractor submitted several references for similar type work. Staff checked references with the Cities of Auburn, Everett, and Renton and all gave favorable reviews and noted that they would hire C. A. Goodman for future projects. and Transportation Committee forwarded to the full City Council, the following staff recommendations: 1. Approve awarding the 11th Place South Drainage Improvement Project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, C A Goodman Construction Company in the amount of $80,401.00, and approve a 10% construction contingency in the amount of $8,400.10. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with C A Goodman Construction Company. Improvement Project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, C A Goodman Construction Company in the amount of $80,401.00, and approve a 10% construction contingency in the amount of $8,400.10, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with C A Goodman Construction_Company. .... ............................................................................................................. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED 1st Reading TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # k:\council\agdbills~2000\l lth pis drain bid awara.aoc RESOLUTION # DATE: .luly 27, 2000 TO: Phil Watkins, Chair Land Use and Transportation committee FROM: Ken Miller, Deputy Director of Public Works \~'~/~' Scott Robinson. Surface Water Construction Coordinator Vi:A: David H. rv~osel~~~er ]~/ SUB3ECT: 11m Place Soutl~Drainage Improvements Project Authorization to Award Bid BACKGROUND On April 18, 2000, the City Council approved the 100% design of the 11~ Place South Drainage Improvements Project, and authorized bidding the project. The total project budget is $100,000 funded by Surface Water Management Minor CIP Funds. The project bid on July 7th, 2000, utilizing the City's small works roster. Following are the seven bids received on July 7, 2000: Contractor ' Bid Amount Peacefield Construction $147,985.00 Pivetta Brothers $103,997.00 Americon $98,971.11 DD! Construction $90,816.95 Monarch Excavating $90,794.53 Roadway Construction $82,402.42 C A Goodman $80,401.00 Engineer's Estimate: ~;70~S00.00 Planning & Design In house staff Bidding & Advertising $500.00 Engineer's Construction Estimate $63,636.63 10% Construction Contingency $6,363.37 Construction Management In house staff Based on the bids received, the lowest responsive bidder is C. A. Goodman in the amount of $80,401.00. In addition, two bidders, Roadway Construction and Peacefield Construction, were rendered non-responsive due to not following bidding instructions. The lowest responsive bid is higher than the engineer's estimate by $16,764.37due to the amount of mobilization costs, traffic control, and pavement restoration the contractor included in their bid. To determine if the apparent Iow bidder, C. A. Goodman, is capable of performing the work, staff requested and the contractor submitted several references for similar type work. Staff checked references with the Cities of Auburn, Everett, and Renton and all gave favorable reviews and noted that they would hire C. A. Goodman for future projects. RECOMMENDATZON Staff recommends placing the following items on the August 22, 2000 Council Consent Agenda: 1. Approve awarding the 11~ Place South Drainage !mprovement Project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, C A Goodman Construction Company in the amount of $80,401.00, and approve a 10% construction contingency in the amount of $8,400.10. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with C A Goodman Construction Company. KM/SR:kc K:\LUTC~2000\I 1TH PLACE SOLIT~ BID AWARD.DOC CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: _X_CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ 90,000 ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ 30,526.50 BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Request for approval of bid and purchase of the core software to be used for electronic document imaging, storage, retrieval and management of the City. This project was approved by Council in 1997 and postponed till now due to changes in regulations regarding acceptance of electronic documents, lack of good document imaging solution, and other priorities. Additional hardware and temporary help for importing documents are budgeted within this project. Please see attached for additional information. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: FEDRAC approved forwarding the ................................................................. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to authorize CM to purchase the Laser Fiche ................................................................................................. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUI~L'-~'~/~ PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED 1st Reading TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # City of Federal Way . Memorandum Date: 8/10/00 To: Finance Economic D. evelopment & Regional Affairs Committee Members Via: David Moset~V-J~anager From: Mehdi Sadri, I'~o'rn~ation Systems Manager//g~t~,. Re: Award and Purchase of Document Management System Background In 1997 the Council approved funding for an electronic document management system (DMS) to provide an efficient and cost effective alternative to the city's record retention and retrieval needs. The benefits of document management system include: · Prevent loss of records · Save storage space · Provide a central location & quick access to documents both for staff and public · Maintain the authenticity and security of the documents The implementation of this project has been postponed until now due the changes in acceptance and recognition of electronic records, lack of mature platform for this application, and other priorities. The following is a summary of system requirements, software RFQ process, software components, and proposed timeline to implement the system. HW/SW required Est. Purchase date Est. Cost 1. HW-Server/document storage/index Purchased in Dec. 1999 $15,000 2. SW-DMS software/install/training Requesting approval $30,000 3. HW~2 High speed scanners Purchase/setup in Sept. $11,000 4. HW-2 workstations ~ Purchase/Setup in Sept. $4,000 5. HW-Web Server retrieval and viewing purchase/setup in Sept. $6,000 6. Temp help for Document Scanning and storage Nov./00- Apr./01 $15,000 Total estimated cost $81~000 Approved Budget $90~000 Software RFQ Process: The City issued a RFP in 1999 for the purchase of DMS software and carefully evaluated each proposal and narrowed down the number of candidates. After several demonstrations and software testing, Archive Index System Inc. is selected as the vendor for the LaserFiche Software based on its cost, capabilities, integration with current systems, and the ease of use and maintenance. Software Components: · Database, document store, index, and retrieval engine · 5 concurrent user licenses for full document scanning, storage, and administration · 25 concurrent licenses for electronic document storage · Web server sofi~vare for access to document through Internet/Intranet · 25 concurrent licenses for document retrieval, viewing and printing · One year support/maintenance and upgrade · 3 days of installation and training Total Software Cost $30,526 Purchase of other equipment: We have identified the requirements and specifications for two scanners, two workstations and one web server. RFQs will be issued for the purchase of the remaining equipment following the council approval of this core sol,are. Project Schedule: 1. Purchase necessary hardware and software September 2. Installation, Servers, two scanners and workstations October 3. Staff training, Access rights November 4. Prioritize documents to be scanned, develop indexes and procedures November 5. Hire temporary help to scan index and store back-logged documents December 6. Open access through Intranet/Internet based on security Jan. 2001 7. Set up procedures to processed and store new documents January Future use: · Online Council/Committee packets · Online City Budget/MFR · Park and recreation brochures Legal documents · Building permits and build drawings · Financial document (Invoices/Purchase orders/reports) · Municipal Court documents FEDRA C Committee Action: Approve the selection and purchase of LaserFiche document management system from Archive Index Systems Inc. for the amount of $30,526.5 and forward the recommendations to full council for approval. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Purchase of Interactive Voice Response (IVR) System CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ __ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ 60,390.40 BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: 1) Memorandum to FEDRAC Committee on purchase of IVR system 2) Memorandum to City Council on cost/benefit analysis SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Acquisition of an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system for integration with the City's permit tracking system. The IVR system is one component being purchased as part of Phase II of the AMANDA permit tracking system implementation. Please see attached memorandums for further detailed information. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: FEDRAC approved forwarding the purchase of the IVR system to full council with a question about the cost/benefit analysis, which a memorandum is attached, during their meeting on August 22, 2000. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to authorize the City Manager to purchase the IVR system from Synertech, permit tracking system vendor, and Selectron Inc.. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET~'~"~A (BELOI~ TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED 1st READING. TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION ENACTMENT READ ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # City of Federal Way Memorandum DATE: August 25, 2000 TO: City Counci! ~/X_ _ VIA: David M~t~XVlanager FROM: Curt Ryser, GIB Supervisor/IS Administrator RE: Cost Recovery Analysis Background Council members have asked that information be prepared regarding the cost/benefit analysis and cost recovery time for the proposed IVR system. The following information will address these questions as well as identify benefits of the IVR system that improve customer service, but are difficult to quantify. Cost Recovery Several of the cost recovery estimates presented in the following section are conservative estimates. It is also important to note that the time needed to recover the purchase cost of the IVR system will depend on the utilization of the IVR system. It is expected that this system will be accepted and used by the public in a minimal amount of time. The public is becoming more familiar with interactive telephone systems such as those used by the banking industry. In addition, the process for scheduling inspections has been slowly evolving in such a way that the change to the IVR system will not be a large departure from what currently occurs. 9,000 Total # of inspection requested to-date 141 # Work days to-date 63 Average # of inspections per day 3+ - # of hours per day required to enter inspection requests (assuming 3 minutes per inspection request) 1 + - # of hours per day to respond to calls canceling/checking status of an inspection 4.5 - Total # of hours per day required by staff to enter inspection requests and answer calls regarding inspection status $22,500 - Gross savings from implementation of IVR system (assuming staff cost of $20/hour, 50 weeks a year, not including benefits) $4,800 - Increased support costs from MIS Division (assuming staff cost of $25/hour, 2 days a month or 192 hours per year) $5,140 Increased maintenance cost of IVR server and AMANDA software $12,560 - Net savings from implementation oflVR system $60,000 - Total cost of IVR system $12,560 - Net savings from implementation of IVR system < 5 years - Recovery of initial cost oflVR system It is also important to note that the cost recovery time could decrease by incorporating some of the Public Work inspections into the IVR system. Staff is reviewing the feasibility of shifting inspections such as the Right-of-Way Job Start call into the IVR system. This change would further increase staff savings. Improved Customer Service There are a number of benefits provided with the IVR system that are difficult to determine a dollar value. Some of the benefits offered by the IVR system are: Calls for inspections can be received up to 5:00 am the day of the inspection. Currently, inspections must be called in prior to 3:30 pm the day before the inspection day in order to allow staff enough time to enter the request into the permit tracking system. Public requesting an inspection will receive a confirmation number upon the successful completion of entering an inspection request. This is not possible with the current system. - Improved accuracy of inspection requests as potential language barriers are minimized thru the use of telephone key pad entry. Optional language modules can be purchased. - Public will now of access to additional information and capabilities. These enhancements include: a) Directly cancel an inspection without the intervention of city staff b) Request the results of an inspection either by voice message or fax c) Leave a voice message with special instructions or information for an inspector d) Listen to a voice message left by the inspector regarding the results of the inspection - IVR system can be expanded to provide additional information to the public based on the needs of other city departments. Optional modules include the ability to provide zoning information by property; status of a project review; directory to staff; verification of active permits. Inspectors can call into the IVR system and enter the results of inspections from the field. City of Federal Way Memorandum DATE: August 11, 2000 TO: Finance, Eco_n, om.~i.cAD_ev_ elopment and Regional Affairs Committee VIA: David M(Sg'd~ ~[y'~anager FROM: Curt Ryser, G~ Supervisor/IS AdministratorC-~d~',~ RE: Purchase of IVR System (Phase II of Permit Tracking System) Background The purpose of this memorandum is to seek the approval of the FEDRAC Committee for the acquisition of an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) module to be used in conjunction with the AMANDA permit tracking system. The IVR module was identified as a component of Phase II of the AMANDA system implementation in the 1999/2000 budget. The IVR system will improve customer service and staff efficiency by allowing public, construction staff, and contractors to schedule, cancel and/or request the results of an inspection from any touch-tone phone. The system includes the ability for faxes to be sent on demand, confirmation numbers to be issued upon successful completion of an inspection request and the ability for both the contractor and field inspector to leave voices messages for each other as needed. Improved Efficiency The IVR system will improve staff efficiency in entering inspection requests into the permit system while providing improved access and functionality for contractors or construction staff. Currently, inspection requests are called in to a voice-mail box that staff record onto log sheets and then enter into the permit system. The IVR system will directly enter the inspection request into the permit system database, eliminating two of the steps currently required. This will allow the city to accept inspection requests up until 5:00 am the morning of the day they would like their inspection completed. Currently, the city only allows inspections to be called in until 3:30 pm the day before the inspection is requested.. Improved Customer Service The public will further benefit from the implementation of the IVR system as they will be able to leave voice messages for the inspectors, request the status of an inspection via a voice message or faxed document, re-schedule or cancel an inspection with out the need to contact city staff directly. In addition, the IVR system has optional modules that the city can purchase at a later date that will allow the public to call and inquire about the zoning/property status as well as review status of their plans. The break down of costs for completing the acquisition and implementation of the IVR system is as follows and includes taxes: IVR SYSTEM COSTS HARDWARE IVR Server: Pentium III Workstation using Microsoft NT, 4-voice ports, 2-fax ports, Voice Permits software, 5-days on-site installation and training, documentation $ 39,530.40 SOFTWARE AMANDA Application Programming Interface (API): Software component required by Voice Permits software in order to communicate with AMANDA database $10,860.00 Contracted services for hardware & software integration: Development of Informix stored procedures required by the AMANDA API software. $10,000.00 TOTAL COST: $ 60,390.40 The $60,390.40 cost identified for the implementation of the IVR system is with in the approved 2000 budget for Phase II of the permit tracking system. Request for Proposals (RFP) were not issued as the components identified for Phase II are additional modules supported by the AMANDA system and can only be purchased from the company directly. The AMANDA permit tracking system was originally selected through an RFP process conducted for Phase I of the permit tracking system. FEDRA C Committee Action: Approve purchase of the IVR system from Synertech Systems and Selectron Inc. for the amount of $60,390.40 and forward the recommendation to the full city council for approval. MEETING DATE: September 5, 2000 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Draft Resolution Concerning Continuation of Moratorium on Cluster Subdivisions CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT X RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ X HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Draft resolution concerning continuation of moratorium. SUMMARYBACKGROUND: On July 18, 2000, the City Council passed Resolution 00-3ao, which enacted a 90-day moratorium on acceptance of applications for or approval of subdivisions using cluster subdivision provisions of the Federal Way City Code. A public hearing on the moratorium is required within 60 days of adoption of the moratorium. Staff recommends the Council adopt the findings of fact contained in the attached draft resolution, and extend the moratorium by an additional 36 days, until November 2 I, 2000, in order to allow completion of SEPA environmental review and consideration by the Planning Commission, LUTC and full City Council of potential amendments to the cluster subdivision code provisions. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve resolution adopting findings of fact and continuing moratorium. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET.'~ ~/~ ¥ · (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED ORDINANCE # TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION RESOLUTION # K:agndaitm\clustermoragenda. do~ RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONTINUING A MORATORIUM ON THE ACCEPTANCE AND ISSUANCE OF CLUSTER SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS AND APPROVALS UTILIZING OR RELYING UPON FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE SECTIONS 20-152(d), 20-153(b), AND/OR 20-154. WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.090 encourages but does not require the use of "innovative land use management techniques, including, but not limited to, density bonuses, cluster housing, planned unit developments, and the transfer of development rights" in a city's comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan contains the twin goals (Land Use Goals 3 and 3.1) of preserving and protecting Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods, while providing a wide range of housing densities and types in the single family designated areas; and WHEREAS, these goals are implemented by polices LUP 14, 19 and 20, which call for the City to maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations, while considering special development techniques (e.g. accessory dwelling units, zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas provided they result in residential development consistent with Res. No. 00- , Page 1 the quality and character of existing neighborhoods, and while preserving site characteristics using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, and lot size averaging; and WHEREAS, in Ordinance No. 98-330, adopted December 15, 1998, the Federal Way City Council adopted procedures for the use and approval of cluster subdivisions; and WHEREAS, these provisions are codified at Federal Way City Code ("FWCC') Sections 20-152(d), 20-153(b), and 20-154; and WHEREAS, the City has, to date, approved only 1 application, and is processing 4 applications, utilizing or seeking to utilize the cluster subdivision code provisions, and therefore the City has not had an opportunity to study the results of implementation of the cluster subdivision code provisions; and WHEREAS, it appears that the City could, in the near future, receive additional applications seeking approval of cluster subdivisions, particularly in the area east of 2 lS' Avenue SW, in the vicinity of Saghalie Junior High School; WHEREAS, members of the public have raised concerns about impacts arising from approval of the cluster subdivision code provisions, including issues of the adequate distance between residential structures, minimum lot size, and the buffering of more dense cluster subdivisions from other, existing, less dense residential uses; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way values the utility of innovative land use management techniques such as clustering, but believes that its land development process and citizens would be best served if cluster subdivisions were designed so as to fully address public health, safety, welfare and/or aesthetic concems; and Res. No. 00- , Page 2 WHEREAS, the City needs to review its codes and ordinances in a comprehensive fashion to determine whether stated concerns have been adequately addressed in existing cluster subdivision provisions, or whether additional amendments are necessary or desirable; and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 authorize cities to adopt moratoria provided a public hearing is held within sixty (60) days of adoption; and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 authorize cities to adopt moratoria provided a public hearing is held within sixty (60) days of adoption; and WHEREAS, on July 18, 2000 the Federal Way City Council adopted Resolution No. 00-320, containing a moratorium barring the acceptance or approval of any subdivision application relying upon cluster subdivision provisions of the FWCC, including but not limited to FWCC Sections 20-152(d), 20-153(b) and/or 20-154, until any necessary code revisions are complete and have been adopted by the Federal Way City Council; WHEREAS, since the adoption of the moratorium, City staff have worked diligently to prepare draft code amendments to address cluster subdivisions; and WHEREAS, through research of cluster subdivisions adopted by other cities, City staff have identified altemative ways to: ensure better transition and compatibility of cluster lot sizes with the lot sizes of existing neighborhoods; design specific cluster subdivision elements; calculate densities; and promote or restrict cluster development; and WHEREAS, on August 16, 2000, City staff held a public meeting, to hear public comments from interested citizens concerning existing City Code cluster subdivisions; and WHEREAS, over 30 people attended the August 16 meeting, and expressed concems over density, change of neighborhood character, crime and environmental protection; and Res. No. 00- , Page 3 WHEREAS, on September 5, 2000, and within 60 days of July 18, 2000, the Federal Way City Council held a public hearing concerning the moratorium adopted in Resolution No. 00-320; and WHEREAS, on September 1, 2000 a threshold environmental determination was issued on possible code amendments pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW 43.21C, and Chapter 18 of the FWCC. There is a 30-day public comment and appeal period on this decision, and code amendments cannot be made until after this time period has elapsed; and WHEREAS, to provide sufficient opportunities for public input, and for Council consideration, FWCC Sections 22-516 - 22-538 set forth a process for consideration of amendments to the FWCC that includes at least one public hearing before the Federal Way Planning Commission, consideration of draft amendments by the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee ("LUTC") and a subsequent recommendation to the full Council by that Committee, and two readings of the draft amendments before the Federal Way City Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on potential code amendments is scheduled for the Planning Commission on September 204 2000, with consideration of the potential code amendments by the LUTC on October 2, 2000 and by the full Council on October 17 and November 7; and WHEREAS, the time remaining in the moratorium adopted in Resolution No. 00- 320 will not permit environmental review and implementation of the schedule called for by Sections 22-516 - 22-538; Res. No. 00- , Page 4 WHEREAS, the Council should therefore continue the moratorium for an additional 36 days, until November 21, 2000, to allow for full consideration of any amendments to the FWCC pertaining to cluster subdivisions; and WHEREAS, the Council should adopt findings of fact to this effect pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The recitals set forth above, along with the recitals set forth in Resolution No. 00-320, are incorporated as if fully set forth herein, and are adopted as and shall serve as Findings of Fact. Section 2. Continuation of Moratorium. The Federal Way City Council hereby declares that the 90-day moratorium adopted in Resolution No. 00-320, is hereby continued for a period not to exceed 36 days, until November 21, 2000. Therefore, during the pendency of the continuation of the moratorium, the City shall not accept or approve any subdivision application utilizing or relying upon the cluster subdivision provisions of the FWCC, including but not limited to FWCC Sections 20-152(d), 20-153(b) and/or 20-154. In addition, the City shall not process any subdivision application utilizing or relying upon the cluster subdivision provisions identified above and submitted after the effective date of Resolution No. 00-320. Section 3. Other Sections Not Affected. During the pendency of the continuation of the moratorium, Sections 2-3 and 5-9 of Resolution No. 00-320 shall remain in full force and effect. Res. No. 00- ., Page 5 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutionalby a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this 5th day of September, 2000. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MIKE PARK ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. 00- K:XRESO\clustermorcont.doc Res. No. 00- , Page 6 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ X BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: None SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At a special meeting on September 5, 2000, the City Council of Whole interviewed applicants to fill seven (7) commission positions on the city's Youth Commission. The City Council will take action on the appointments at their regular meeting on September 5, 2000. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: City Council of Whole will recommend the applicants to fill the appropriate vacancies on the city's Youth Commission. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to confirm the appointments of the applicants selected to fill the seven commission positions on the city's Youth Commission for 2-year terms. (The City Clerk will arrange for introduction and presentation of appointment certificates for the newly appointed commissioners at the September 19, 2000 regular meeting) APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ~ ~" ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED ORDINANCE # TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION RESOLUTION # CCCOVER-1/26~0 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ X BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: None SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At a special meeting on September 5, 2000, the City Council of Whole interviewed applicants to fill one (1) unexpired committee position on the city's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. The City Council will take action on the appointment at their regular meeting on September 5, 2000. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: City Council of Whole will recommend the applicant to fill the unexpired position on the city's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Motion to confirm the appointment of the applicant selected to fill the unexpired position on the city's Lodging Tax Advisory Committee through October 31, 2000. (The City Clerk will arrange for introduction and presentation of the appointment certificate for the newly appointed committee member at the Septemher 19, 2000 regular meeting) APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKE~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # DENIED ORDINANCE # TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION RESOLUTION # CCCOVER- 1/26/00 MEETING DATE: September 19, 2000 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: __CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ X BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER .... attachments. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: On July 8, 1999 Lakehaven Utility District adopted a Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan Update. Under Washington law, the City of Federal Way and other cities located within the District have the legal authority to approve or reject the plan. If the plan is not approved, the District is prohibited by law (with limited exceptions) from making expenditures on plan projects. City staff retained RW Beck, a firm with substantial experience in preparation and review of comprehensive wastewater plans, to review Lakehaven's plan and to advise the City as to its acceptability. RW Beck completed its analysis, which is attached. As the RW Beck review notes, the Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan appears to adequately address the principal technical requirements as specified in the state statutes, and meet generally accepted standards in the municipal wastewater industry for documentation of this type. The plan does raise, however, some minor issued as stated below: · The plan presents a program to reduce infiltration and inflow (I&I) to the sewer system. This program is projected to provide significant increase in available sewage treatment capacity by diverting I&I from existing treatment plants to storm water systems. In concept, this is a sound approach, however, the effectiveness of I&I programs can be difficult to predict. A more detailed look at the methodology may be appropriate to determine the level of conservatism used in the analysis. · Implementation of the plan recommendation will result in redistribution of the sewage flows between drainage basins within the boundaries of LUD, and potentially from and to adjacent sewage management jurisdictions. The NPDES permits for affected facilities and other applicable permits should be reviewed for any requirements affecting the feasibility of these recommendations. plan are not consistent with the financial analysis conducted by Kennedy Jenks Consultants. Neither of these two issues appear to have a significant impact; however, the plan should be updated to incorporate the assumptions contained in the financial analysis with respe~t to projected growth rate (1.5% versus 1.7%) and additional revenue to fund the CIP. .... i~'~'~¥-'i~iS~qi~'i'L'"~'iS~i'~gg'"~i~iS~-~'g~iSX¥iiSiq'i'-~'~3'~'~ .............................................................................................................................. .... '~'i¥'~'"'"'"~XiqXi~'g'i~'"'"'"~'O'~'~giq'iJX¥i'iSN':.' ........ Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan. ~.~..~ ...................... .... 2¢'~'~6X¢"~;h"i~'~'~'~i;~'i~'"~;~'~iL'"~'X~'~'~? ~//~ v ~' ........................................................................ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL ~ DENIED 1st Reading TABLED~EFE~D~O ACTION Enactment Reading O~INANCE ~ k:XcouncilXagdbills~000Xlakehaven ud w~tewater plan.doc ~SOLUTION ~ February 11, 2000 ~:~B~:~~I tl ~ l Mr. Marwan Salloum /kD~Tl0t~ lkrgl~{}lql City of Federal Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, Washington 98003-6210 Subject: Initial Review of Financial Components of the Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan and Other Related Documents Dear Mr. Salloum: This letter report presents the results of our initial review of the financial components of the Lakehaven Utility District 1999 Draft Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan (Plan) prepared by Penhallegon Associates and other related financial documents. This letter supplements our letter of January 26, 2000 which summarized our review of the technical aspects of the Plan. We reviewed the financial documents to assess Lakehaven Utility District's (LUD's) financial ability to: · Service current and future wastewater customers, · Fund capital improvement projects described in the Plan, · Address debt service obligations, and · Meet other financial requirements. Our report describes recent developments undertaken by LUD, summarizes projected wastewater service requirements, identifies capital improvement costs, describes financing alternatives and presents our analysis and preliminary conclusion. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS A primary purpose of the Plan was to develop a comprehensive document that identifies existing and future service needs (Panhallegon, 1999). Late in October 1999, LUD retained Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (KJC) to reassess the District's financial structure and to recommend possible changes in funding sources to address these service needs. Because LUD has made significant financial decisions based on the results of the KJC analysis, this report compares information presented in the Plan with the results of the KJC analysis. KJC analyzed different financing scenarios for the years 2000 to 2003 (KJC, 1999). Based on anticipated growth rates, proposed capital improvements and financial requirements presented in the analysis, LUD raised sewer rates 8 percent effective December 31, 1999. The KJC analysis also proposed a $3 million public bond to finance capital improvements. According to the draft 2000 budget, LUD expects this rate increase and bond issue to cover all anticipated funding needs for the next three years (LUD, 1999). Appendix A contains a summary of the final KJC financial analysis results. 1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98154-1004 Phone (206) 695-4700 Fax (206) 695-4764 Mi'. Marwan Salloum February 11, 2000 Page 2 PROJECTED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS Tables la and lb summarize various LUD service area projections to 2003. The Plan presents data for two employment growth scenarios. Data in Table la represent the high- growth scenario and data in Table lb represent the low-growth scenario. The population, employment and billing units data are from the Plan and the equivalent residential unit (ERU) data are from the LUD 2000 draft budget and the KJC analysis. Based on descrip- tions presented in the Plan, we concluded that the terms "billing units" and "ERUs" were. the same. The annual compounded growth rate based on population, employment and ERUs presented under either scenario in the Plan is significantly greater compared with the KJC analysis ERU growth rate. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Plan presents a capital improve~nent program (CIP) and estimated costs. Table 2 shows that the Plan costs (see Appendix B) match the program costs in the LUD 1999 budget but differ substantially from the program costs presented in the LUD 2000 budget and the KJC analysis. In particular, the CIP costs for 2000 presented in the LUD 2000 budget are approximately four times greater than CIP 2000 costs presented in the Plan. Based on information presented in the LUD budgets, the basis for increased CIP costs includes delayed project implementation, higher estimates of project costs and the addition of several new projects. The KJC analysis includes a reduction in actual capital spending from the proposed capital spending amounts by approximately 20 percent for the years 2000 through 2003. However, these reduced spending estimates are significantly greater than the amounts reportedly spent for 1997 and 1998 (26.3 percent and 44.4 percent of the proposed capital budgets, respectively, (KJC, 1999)). FINANCING ALTERNATIVES The Plan presents a pro forma financial revenue analysis to evaluate the future financial structure of the LUD. Table 3 summarizes various underlying assumptions and key results of the Plan and the assumptions used in the KJC analysis. In general, the KJC analysis uses assumptions that are more conservative than the assumptions presented in the Plan. The Plan recommends an appropriate funding mix to finance the proposed CIP and iden- tifies general sources of financing including: · Low-cost government financing, · Reserve funds from accumulated depreciation generated by user rates, Mr. Marwan Salloum February 11, 2000 Page 3 · Possible inter-local and contract agreements with other municipalities and agencies (including private organizations) to share system improvement costs and · Utility local improvement district and developer contributions to fund projects that do not benefit all LUD customers. The Plan also recommends evaluating the capital facilities charge (CFC) and user charges to ensure equitable cost sharing that includes consideration of the costs for the CIE In 1999 LUD pursued some of the recommended funding options presented in the Plan. LUD acquired a low-cost $1.6 million loan from the Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) offered through the Washington Department of Trade and Economic Development. The loan amount is available in 2000. Financing terms include an interest rate of 1 percent, a loan period of 20 years and a local match of 30 percent. Amortization begins in January 2001. The 8 percent rate increase implemented at the end of 1999 is consistent with the KJC analysis and wilt result in approximately $800,000 in additional annual operating revenue (KJC, 1999). ANALYSIS PROJECTED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS We compared the Plan's demographic projections (summarized in Tables la and lb) with potable water demographic projections presented in the LUD Final Comprehensive Water System Plan (Water Plan) Update (KJC, 1998). For the year 2003, the combined population and employment figures presented in the Plan are 8 percent greater than projections presented in Water Plan. The Plan's assumed billing unit growth rate of 1.7 percent exceeds the 1.5 percent ERU growth rate used in the KJC analysis. We did not attempt to assess the impact of the Plan's projected higher billing unit demand on LUD's financial status because it was not part of the scope of this initial review. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Table 2 shows that the estimated CIP costs for 2000 presented in the LUD 2000 budget are four times greater than the costs presented in the Plan. The Plan's estimate for the 2000- 2003 CIP also is significantly less than the comparable estimates presented in the LUD 2000 budget and the KJC analysis. However, the Plan projects higher billing units and service requirements compared with the KJC analysis (see Tables la and lb). It was unclear why the Plan would project higher service requirements and significantly lower CIP costs compared with the LUD 2000 budget and KJC analysis. Mr. Marwan Salloum February 11, 2000 Page 4 LUD has significantly under-spent its CIP budget in 1998 and 1999 (see Table 2). Thus, although the 2000 CIP is substantially greater than previous or subsequent years, LUD may be unable to implement the 2000 CIP at this anticipated level. In this case, LUD would delay the 2000 CIP costs until later years, resulting in a positive impact on short-term cash balances and allowing LUD to reassess its long-term capital spending requirements. To finance the anticipated CIE LUD has increased user rates 8 percent, obtained a PWTF loan and appears ready to apply for up to $3 million in additional public financing (KJC, 1999). LUD may not apply for this additional financing if the 2000 CIP program is not fully implemented. Based on the KJC analysis, LUD readily meets its debt service requirements, has adequate cash reserves to handle several months of operating expenses, and meets its internal minimum cash combined reserve requirement of $800,000 for the wastewater maintenance and construction funds (LUD, 1999). CAPIlA[ FACI[IIIES CHARGE LUD anticipates using CFC revenue to fund a significant portion of CIP costs (at $2,720 per ERU, approximately 45.7 percent of the 2000-2003 CIP expenditures could be funded with CFC revenue). Based on the available information, it was not possible to assess the equitable sharing of costs between user fees and CFC charges. LUD would need to prepare a cost-of-service study to assess a fair division of costs among users. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS Based on our initial review of the information presented in the Plan and the KJC analysis, we offer the following observations: · The projected service requirements in the Plan are significantly greater than the 1.5 percent projected growth rate used in the KJC analysis. However, based on our experience, the 1.5 percent growth rate does not seem unreasonable. We do not believe this lower growth rate will materially affect LUD's financial capability to meet operational requirements or capital spending. · The Plan projects greater service requirements and a significantly lower CIP budget compared with the KJC analysis. We did not attempt to explain this inconsistency because it was not part of the scope of this initial review. · Our analysis indicates that the CIP estimate presented in the KJC analysis can be adequately funded with revenue from the recent 8 percent rate increase, the $1.6 million PWTF loan, and the potential for up to $3 million in additional financing. Based on these financial resources, LUD is projecting not to require increases in the CFC rate. Mr. Marwan Salloum February 11, 2000 Page 5 · Based on LUD's recent capital spending history, a portion of the 2000 CIP is likely to be delayed and allocated to subsequent years. This should help funding levels. · Based oil information presented in the KJC analysis, total CFC revenue for 2000 through 2003 is approximately $6.0 million. Total operating revenues are $44.0 million, and tile anticipated CIP is $13.1 ~nillion. Given these figures, CFCs are projected to provide approximately 13.6 percent of LUD's total operating revenues or fund approximately 45.7 percent of the CIP. · We could not assess the equitable sharing of costs among LUD customers. A cost-of- service study would be needed to make this assessment. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with assessing wastewater service issues for the City of Federal Way. Please call us at (206) 695-4700 if you have any questions. Sincerely, R. W. BECK, INC. Ro e~rtI. Bing~am Principal RJB:bb LUD Review.doc File: -]1-00518-10001/116093 Mr. Marwan Salloum February 11, 2000 Page 6 REFERENCES Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, "Lakehaven Utility District Final Comprehensive Water System Plan Update," Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Federal Way, Washington, November 1998. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, "Summary of Wastewater Finances 1998-2003, Lakehaven Utility District, One-time Rate Increase with Debt Financing," prepared for the Lakehaven Utility District, October 1999. E-mailed to R. W. Beck on February 1, 2000. Kennedy/Jenks Con- sultants, Federal Way, Washington. Lakehaven Utility District, %000 Preliminary Budget Draft, December 1, 1999," Lakehaven Utility District, Federal Way, Washington, 1999. Lakehaven Utility District, "1999 Preliminary Budget Draft, October 22, 1998," Lakehaven Utility District, Federal Way, Washington, 1998. Panhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers and Brown and Caldwell, "Lakehaven Utility District 1999 Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan, Draft," Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc., Kirkland, Washington, Brown and Caldwell, Inc., Seattle, Washington, 1999. TABLE la LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT ALTERNATIVE PROJECTED SEWER SERVICE REQUIREMENT (HIGH GROWTH EMPLOYMENT SCENARIO) 1997-2003 Compunded C~legor~ 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Ca'ow~h Rale Comprehensive Plan' Demo§raphic~ POl~t~ation NA~ NA 108,783 NA NA NA NA NA 120,678 1.74% Employmem NA NA 37,199 NA NA NA NA NA 47,318 4.09% Total Populatio~ and Employment NA NA 145,982 NA NA NA NA NA 167,996 2.37% Billing Units NA NA NA 38,604 39,260 39,928 40,607 41,297 41,999 1.70% KIC Analysis4 ERUss 34,171 34,429 34,954 3S,208 35,840 36,378 36,923 37,477 38,039 1.42% (1) The compounded growth rate was based on values for 1997 and 2003 except for the Comprehensive Plan billing units (1998 and 2003). (2) Source: Panhallegon (1999), Table 3-4 and Table 12-1. (3) NA = Not available. (4) Source: Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (1999). (5) ERUs = Equivalent Residential Units. Values for 1995 through 1998 are from the Lakehaven Utility District 2000 Preliminary Budget Draft. Values for 1999 through 2003 are from Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (1999). File: 11-00518-10001/116093 TABLE lb LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT ALTERNATIVE PROJECTED SEWER SERVICE REQUIREMENTS (LOW GROWTH EMPLOYMENT SCENARIO) 1997-2003 Compounded Categor~ 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 GrovAh Kate~ Comprehensive P~an' Demographics Population NA~ NA 108,783 NA N^ NA NA NA 120,678 1.74% [mpk~/mer~t NA NA 37,199 NA NA NA NA NA 42,371 2.19% Total Populatio~ and [m@loymentN^ NA 145,982 NA NA NA NA NA 163,049 1.86% BilEng Units N^ NA NA 38,604 39,260 39,928 40,607 41,297 41,999 1.70% KJC Analysis4 ' [RUs~ 34,171 34,429 34,954 35,208 35,840 36,378 36,923 37,477 38,039 1.42% (1) The compounded growth rate was based on values for 1997 and 2003 except for the Comprehensive Plan billing units (1998 and 2003). (2) Source: Panhallegon (1999), Table 3-4 and Table 12-1. (3) NA = Not available. (4) Source: Kennedy/Jet, ks Consultants (1999). (5) ERUs = Equivalent Residential Units. Values for 1995 through 1998 are from the Lakehaven Utility District 2000 Preliminary Budget Draft. Values for 1999 through 2003 are from Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (1999). File: 11-00518-10001fl 16093 TABLE 2 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT ALTERNATE PROJECTED EXPENDITURES IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Year 1998-1999 2000-2003 Budget Source 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total Total Comprehensive ?,ewer Plan0~ $1,721,000 $5,789,000 $2,100,000 $1,625,000 $2,690,000 $830,000 $7,510,000 $7,245,000 LUD 1999 Budget°~ NR(2~ 5,789,000 2,100,000 1,625,000 2,690,000 830,000 5,789,000 7,245,000 L,UD 2000 Budget(4~ NR NR 8,296,000 3,063,000 4,105,000 885,000 16,349,000 4,139,000(6~ 5,789,000(6: 7,870,000c4 3,187,000c~ 4,356,000( 958,000c~ 9,928,000 16,371,000 KJC Analysis(~ 1,087,000(6) 2,568,000(6 6,296,000c~ 2,549,600(~ 3,484,800( 766,400c/) 3,655,000 13,096,800 (1) Source: Panhallegon Associates (1999). (2) NR = not reported. (3) Source: LUD(1998). (4) Source: LUD(1999). (5) Source: Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (1999). (6) First figure is proposed capital budget. Second figure is budget actually spent. (7) First figure is proposed capital budget. Second figure is the budget amount that is anticipated to be spent. File: 11-00518-10001/116093 TABLE 3 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT COMPARISON OF ASSUMPTIONS AND RESULTS IN REVENUE ANALYSES Assumption Plan Analysis"~ K]C Analysis~2~ Conservative Analysis Inflation 3% for all expenditures 5% for salaries and KJC benefits 4% for services 3% for supplies Operating Revenue 2.4% annual increase One-time increase of Plan 7.4% compounded Increases except in 1999 8% in 2000 rate (1.024'~) in 2002 vs. (4.8% increase) 8.0% KJC rate in 2002 ~,nnual Depreciation $1.3 million $873,000 in 1998 KJC (Lakota Plant) decreasing to $538,000 in 2003 (All other assets) Approximately $1,691,126 in 1998 Plan $1.75 million increasing to $2,400,453 in 2,003 Interest Income 5% 4.02% in 2000; Similar 5% in 2001-2003 Capital Facilities $2,720 per new billing $2,720 per new billing Same Charge unit unit ERUs~'~ 39,928 (2000) 36,378 (2000) KJC (for generating 41,999 (2003) 38,039 (2003) user revenue) Annual ERU Growth 1.7% 1.5% KJC Ending Cash & Minimum: Minimum: KJC (generally) Equivalents, 2,000 - $3,642,302 (2000) $4,748,246 (2002) 2003t4~ Maximum: Maximum: $9,391,268 (2003) $6,002,852 (2001) Lowest Anticipated 1.46 in 2000 1.56 in 2003 Varies Wastewater Debt Coverage (2000 - 2003) (1.0 minimum)~5~ (1) Source: Panhallegon Associates (1999). (2) Source: Kennedy/Jenks Consultants (1999). (3) Equivalent Residential Units. (4) Minimum LUD cash reserve requirements: $300,000 maintenance/revenue bond fund; $500,000 sewer construction fund (LUD, 1999). (5) The Plan did not present the debt coverage ratio. The ratio was calculated for this report by dividing income available for debt service by debt principal and interest. See Appendix B. File: 11-00518-10001/116093 Appendix A KENNEDY/]ENKS'CONSULTANTS FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX B WASTEWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FINANCIAL SUMMARY 1 February2000 DISCUSSION DRAFT Mr. Marwan Salloum, P.E. City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003-6210 Subject: Review of Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan Dear Marwan: This letter report summarizes our initial technical review of the 1999 Draft Lakehaven Utility District (Lakehaven) Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan (Wastewater Plan). Our review and opinions are based on technical information provided to us by the City of Federal Way (the City) and Lakehaven. We have made our best effort to obtain all relevant information and we believe information related to the technical part of the Wastewater Plan is reasonably complete. However, to the extent that this information may be incomplete and/or out of date our findings will be affected accordingly. INITIAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS In conducting our review, we followed the same approach as was used during R.W. Beck's review of the Water Comprehensive Plan. Our objective was to identify any issues or concerns related to principal underlying assumptions, technical and financial adequacy, service level requirements, and the reasonableness of future projections of wastewater conveyance and treahnent requirements. Based on this initial review, we offer the following findings and conclusions: 1. We have yet to receive all of the financial information required and therefore have been unable to conduct a review of the financial aspects of the Wastewater Plan. There is a close relationship between certain technical and financial issues, particularly in the area of Capital facility development and operation. For this' reason, until we have had an opportunity to review the financial information, the conclusions that are summarized in this letter should be considered preliminary and subject to change. 2. Plan appears to adequately address the principal technical requirements as specified in the state statutes, and meets generally accepted standards in the municipal wastewater industry for documentation of this type. 3. A program to reduce infiltration and inflow (I&I) to the sewer system is proposed. This program is projected to provide significant increase in available sewage treatment capacity by diverting I&I away from existing treatment plants to storm water systems. In concept, this is a sound approach, however, the effectiveness of I&I programs can be difficult to predict. A more detailed look the methodology may be appropriate to determine the level of conservatism used in the analysis. 4. Implementing the Plan recommendations will result in a redistribution of sewage flows between drainage basins within the boundaries of LUD, and potentially from and to adjacent sewage management jurisdictions. The NPDES permits for affected facilities and other applicable permits should be reviewed for any requirements affecting the feasibility of these recommendations. The remainder of this letter provides background information on our review. BACKGROUND In December 1999, R. W. Beck was hired by the City to conduct a review of Lakehaven's Wastewater Plan. To do so, we first held an informational gathering meeting with appropriate City and Lakehaven staff. We then reviewed the entire Wastewater Plan and a number of background documents provided us by the City and Lakehaven. The documents reviewed include: 1. 1999 Lakehaven Utility District Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan 2. Lakehaven Utility District 2000 Preliminary Budget Draft 3. Lakehaven Utility District Rate Analysis Tables Based on our review of this information, we have evaluated the technical adequacy of the Wastewater Plan with respect to addressing the following primary questions: 1. Does the Wastewater Plan adequately provide for wastewater services for Lakehaven's present and reasonably foreseeable needs? 1.A Are assumptions concerning short and long-term wastewater collection and treatment needs reasonable and prudent? · Flow Capacity · Plant Capacity · Pump Station Improvements · I&I 1.B Are wastewater demands adequately tied to projected residential and commercial growth? 2. Is the Wastewater Plan compatible with other adjacent or regional wastewater treatment plans? 3. Does the Wastewater Plan meet the requirements of local sewer plans as identified in the WAC? Our answers to these questions are based on the information we were able to obtain from Lakehaven and on the requirements for comprehensive wastewater system plans contained in state statutes and regulations. We also referred to industry standards, as practiced by wastewater utilities in the Puget Sound region, as well as our professional opinion as to the reasonableness of any given assumption, practice, or proposal. Once we have received complete financial information, we intend to revisit these questions as they relate to financial issues. In addition we will address the following questions. 4. Does the Wastewater Plan contain an adequate long-term plan for financing needed improvements and an adequate method for distributing their cost and expense? 4.A Is the proposed rate structure sufficient to address necessary capital improvements and operations needs? 4.B Is there an identified plan for financing and funding capital improvements and operations needs? 1. DOES THE WASTEWATER PLAN ADEQUATELY PROVIDE FOR WASTEWATER SERVICES FOR LAKEHAVEN'S PRESENT AND REASONABLY FORESEEABLE NEEDS? The Wastewater Plan identifies existing corporate and service area boundaries, potential service area boundaries, and neighboring wastewater utility providers, and provides population and employment forecasts that correspond with the District's corporate boundary. In reviewing the Wastewater Plan, it appears that Lakehaven has developed a reasonable approach to project future demands, and identifies both collection system improvements and treatment plant improvements for anticipated growth by 2003, 2017, and at full buildout. We have, however, identified a number of iskues and/or questions' regarding the proposed long-term wastewater flow projections as well as the methodologies and assumptions used to project future demands which are discussed in items 1.A and 1.B below. 1 .A ARE ASSUMPTIONS CONCERNING SHORT AND LONG-TERM WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT NEEDS REASONABLE AND PRUDENT? Flow Capacity: The flow capacity estimates appear to have been made using generally accepted methodologies. Hydragraphics Version 3.1, developed by Pizer Engineering Software, Inc., was used to model the conveyance system under existing and projected flows for pipes greater than 10-inches in diameter. Based on our experience in the Puget Sound area, this software product is typically used to assess the capacity of the existing collection system. The software models existing conditions and identifies potential problem areas under a given set of development conditions. Our only question relates to how this flow capacity was determined. Section 6.4.12 of the Wastewater Plan states that "a roughness coefficient ("n' value) appropriate to the pipe type shall be used in Manning's formula for the design of wastewater pipeline facilities", yet Section C1-4.3 of the Washington Department of Ecology (DOE) "Criteria for Sewerage Works Design" 1998 (the "Orange Book") states that "an "n' value of 0.013 shall be used... (regardless of pipe material)..." Plant Capacity: The plant capacity estimates appear to have been made using generally accepted methodologies, although it should be noted that the 1985 version of the Orange Book was used as the basis for establishing the design criteria. Since the 1998 Orange Book was available as of the date of the Wastewater Plan, these criteria should be checked to. ensure that those used in the Wastewater Plan reflect the values provided in the 1998 edition. Also, the ability of the plant to meet treatment needs is affected by the amount of future inflow and infiltration (I&I) (see below). If I&I values used in estimating sewage treatment needs are incorrect, or if I&I programs are unsuccessful in reducing the amount of I&I, plant capacity expansion needs will differ from those presented in the Wastewater Plan. Pump Station Improvements: Pump station capacity estimates appear to have been made using generally accepted methodologies. Once again, I&I estimates play a significant role in estimating pump station capacity. Since an average value is used throughout each basin, actual values at each pump station may vary significantly. Consequently, values used will need to be verified as part of the design of pump station upgrades. Inflow & Infiltration (I&I): Limited data was used to estimate the amount of I&I for each basin. This analysis indicated that I&I in the Lakota Basin is approximately 750 gpad and approximately 1,700 gpad in the Redondo Basin. A value of 1,100 gpad is typically used for new or replacement design, of which 600 gpad is assumed to be from infiltration and 500 gpad from inflow. The Wastewater Plan assumes a value of 1,100 gpad in flow projections for the Lakota Basin and 1,700 for the Redondo Basin. According to the CIP, $100,000 and $200,000 per year are allocated for I&I reduction programs in the Lakota and Redondo Basins, respectively, through the year 2004. If in fact these programs are successful in reducing I&I, I&I values used in estimating future flow projections are probably valid, especially in the Lakota Basin where some margin of safety has been provided by the difference between the actual estimated 750 gpad and the assumed future I&I of 1,100 gpad. A value of 1,700 gpad for the older Redondo system seems to be a less conservative estimate than that used for the Lakota system. 1 .B ARE WASTEWATER DEMANDS ADEQUATELY TIED TO PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL GROWTH? While we have not reviewed the underlying residential and commercial growth methodology which forms the basis for determining future wastewater conveyance and treatment needs, they seem reasonable, although we would like to note the following observations: · As a preliminary review of the existing and projected population and employment data and forecasts provided in the Wastewater Plan, it should be noted that both existing and projected number differ somewhat from those presented in the Water Plan. These differences may be due variations in serviceable areas between the two plans. · Although the Wastewater Plan states that "Scenario 2 population forecasts are very similar to Scenario 1 forecasts", these numbers are in fact identical. · The numbers presented in the Table 3-4 differ slightly from the descriptions provided in sections 3.5.2 and 3.5.3. 2 IS THE WASTEWATER PLAN COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER ADJACENT OR REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENTS PLANS? Wastewater plans for neighboring cities and sewer districts, such as Midway Sewer District, City of Kent Sewer, City of Auburn Water & Sewer, City of Algona, City of Pacific, and Pierce County Sewer have not been reviewed by us. We have reviewed the Regional Wastewater Services Plan (RWSP) prepared by King County Department of Natural Resources (KCDNR) which identifies the preferred plan for managing wastewater flows serviced under KCDNR. The RWSP represents the King County Executive decision that was arrived at as a result of extensive technical evaluations and public input. A comparison on how the LUD Wastewater Plan addresses those top priority issues identified in the RWSP has been included only for the purpose of general information. · The RWSP ranks CSO control as a top priority. Reducing I&I and continuing to recycle biosolids were also highly rated in the RWSP. Other recommendations included in the RWSP are to provide economically feasible opportunities to reuse highly-treated water from WWTPs. · Since the Wastewater Plan states that "no combined sanitary and storm sewers exist or are allowed within the District", CSO control is not an issue. Additionally, since "No overflows or new overflow structures will be permitted", building CSO treatment plants is not necessary. · The recommended capital improvements program (CIP) presented in the Wastewater Plan shows that several I&I programs have been provided with yearly funding to identify and resolve I&I problems at several locations within the service area. · Wastewater Plan CIP Project LP-18 for construction of biosolids composting facility addresses this highly prioritized recommendation presented in the RWSP. (Although this project is presented in section 10.4.11, this item was not included in Table 11-1, LUD Recommended Capital Facility Plan.) · The Wastewater Plan does not provide funding for advanced wastewater treatment for reuse opportunities. · The RWSP based its service strategies on the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) forecasts of population and employment growth targets adopted as part of the King County Comprehensive Plan. The Wastewater Plan uses the PSRC data in forecasting as part of its Scenario 2 adjustments. 3 DOES THE WASTEWATER PLAN MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL SEWER PLANS AS IDENTIFIED IN THE WAC? WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (DOE) "CRITERIA FOR SEWERAGE WORKS DESIGN" (THe "OrAnGe BooK") The Wastewater Plan provides a footnote that states that an updated version of the Orange Book is anticipated in 1999, the 1985 Orange Book is referenced. In actuality, the Orange Book was updated December 1998, and since the Draft Wastewater Plan is dated 1999, the 1998 Orange Book would appear to be the appropriate document to use in development of the Wastewater Plan. WAC Although the LUD has not received review comments from DOE, we have provided an independent review of the WAC requirements as they pertain to the completeness of the Wastewater Plan. Our review does not in any way certify that DOE will approve the Wastewater Plan. A list of requirements that shall be included in a general sewer plan are provided in WAC173-240-050(3)(a) through (n). The Wastewater Plan includes most of these requirements, although some detail is lacking. Only those items that are missing or incomplete are discussed herein. (d) Layout map including the following: (ii) Existing sewers. The location, size, slope, capacity, direction of flow of all existing trunk sewers, and the boundaries of the areas served by each. Only a general description of existing sewers is provided. (iii) Proposed sewers. The location, size, slope, capacity, direction of flow of all proposed trunk sewers, and the boundaries of the areas served by each. Only a general description of proposed sewers is provided. (v) Topography and elevations. Topography showing pertinent ground elevations and surface drainage shall be shown, as well as proposed and existing streets. A topography map has not been included in the Wastewater Plan. (vi) Streams lakes, and other bodies of water. The location and direction of low of major streams, the high and low elevations of water surfaces at sewer outlets, and controlled overflows, if any. All existing and potential discharge locations should be noted Although some of this information has been described in the text of the report, this information has not been provided on a map. (vii) Water systems. The location of wells or other sources of water supply, water storage reservoirs and treatment plants, and water transmission facilities. This information has not been provided. (i) List of all establishments producing industrial wastewater, the quantity of wastewater and period of production, and the character of such industrial wastewater insofar as it may affect the sewer system or treatment plan. Consideration shall be given to future industrial expansion. This information has not been provided. (j) Discussion of the location of all existing private and public wells, or other sources of water supply, and distribution structures as they are related to both existing and proposed domestic wastewater treatment facilities. This information has not been provided. (k) Discussion of the various alternatives evaluated, and a determination of the alternative chose, if applicable. Only the final alternative is presented. (1) A discussion, including a table, which shows the cost per service in terms of both debt service and operation and maintenance costs, of all facilities (existing and proposed) during the planning period. (m) A statement regarding compliance with any adopted water quality management plan pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended. Comment to be included ~ finals lof'~ sSiOn paper; We hope that this information will be helpful as you address the wastewater issues facing the City. If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at (206)-695-4504. Sincerely, R. W. BECK, INC. Robert J. Bingham Principal MEETING DATE: September 5, 2000 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Federal Way City Code Chapter 6, Criminal Code Amendment CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ X ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ BUSINESS __PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SESSION FYI OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Memo from Interim ChiefChaney to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee regarding the proposed amendment to the City Criminal Code, Chapter Six and the final draft outlining the ordinance amendment. SU-MMARY/BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Federal Way City Council Ordinance, the Public Safety Department is requesting adoption of the ordinance to amend the Criminal Code under City Code Chapter Six. The adoption of this ordinance is solely to revise existing criminal code to reflect amendments, additions or deletions exhibited in the State Statutes, the Revised Washington Code (R.C.W.). fhe purpose of this amendment is to bring current the City Criminal Code Chapter Six as set forth by the State Statutes R.C.W. and to expand Chapter Six to specifically address the establishment of "Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution (SOAP)" Orders. These orders, which can be issued by the Federal Way Municipal Court, will provide an additional approach against crimes of prostitution typically repeated in such areas. The ordinance will be effective September 10, 2000. The adoption of this amendment is in the best interest of the City of Federal Way, the Public Safety Department, Law Department, Municipal Court, and the Federal Way Citizens. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMblENDATION: At the August 7, 2000 meeting the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee Meeting recommended that the proposed amendment to the Federal Way City Code Chapter Six, Criminal Code be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENI)ATION: Motion to move amendment of ordinance to second reading and enactment at the next regular meeting. ~ ~ · A APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ~/'~ IV ~ ~,,,- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: COUNCIL BILL # APPROVED 1 st Reading DENIED Enactment Reading TABLED/DEFERREDfNO ACTION ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Item 5D CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Date: August 7, 2000 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Thomas J. Chaney, Sr., Interim Chief of Police Via: David mo~Z~anager Subject: Federal Way City Code Chapter 6, Criminal Code Amendment Background: Pursuant to the Federal Way City Council Ordinance, the Public Safety Departmentis requesting adoption of the ordinance to amend the Criminal Code under City Code Chapter Six. The adoption of this ordinance is solely to revise existing criminal code to reflect amendments, additions or deletions exhibited in the State Statutes, the Revised Washington Code (R.C.W.). The purpose of this amendment is to bring current the City Criminal Code Chapter Six as set forth by the State Statutes R.C.W. and to expand Chapter Six to specifically address the establishment of "Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution (SOAP)" Orders. These orders, which can be issued by the Federal Way Municipal Court, will provide an additional approach against crimes of prostitution typically repeated in such areas. The ordinance will be effective September 10, 2000. The adoption of this amendment is in the best interest of the City of Federal Way, the Public Safety Department, Law Department, Municipal Court, and the Federal Way Citizens. Attached is the fmal draft outli .ning the ordinance amendment. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and adopt the Ordinance amending the Federal Way City Code Chapter Six, Criminal Code. i/LAURA/MS/AGEN DA/PS/080700/CCCHA P6 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. J~,~ ~/o a AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER SIX, CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDING ORDINANCE NOs. 91-89, 91-106, 94-208, AND 97-299) WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council adopted the Criminal Code Chapter six in 1991, and subsequently modified it; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature has modified state law wherein certain felonies have become misdemeanors and some misdemeanors have become felonies; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature has created additional crimes; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of its citizens to update the Criminal Code in accordance with state law; and -WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council finds that Stay Out of Areas of- Prostitution Orders should be established to provide for more effective enforcement against the crimes of prostitution typically and repeatedly committed in such areas. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Article III, Section 6-61 of the City of Federal Way Criminal Code Chapter is amended as follows: Sec. 6-61. Statutes adopted. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, is are adopted by reference: RCW 9.68A.C,90, ~-' .......... -'--': ...... :"- a iiiiiiOi- xl~utlu~a~ (1) RCW 9.02.050, Concealing birth. ORD # ., PAGE 1 (2) RCW 9A.42.010~ Definitions. ~ RCW 9A.42.080, Abandonment of a dependent person in the third degree, 4~3_) RCW 9A.42.090, Abandonment of a dependent person - Defense. Section 2. Article IV, Section 6-89 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-89. Inhaling toxic fumes. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.47A.010, Definition. (2) RCW 9.47A.020, Unlawful inhalation - Exception. (3) RCW 9.47A.030, Possession of certain substances prohibited, when. (4) RCW 9.47A.040, Sale of certain substances prohibited, when. (5) RCW 9.47A.050, Penalty, Section 3. Article VI, Section 6-136 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-136. Firearms and dangerous weapons, prohibitions. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.41.010, Terms defined. (2) RCW 9.41.050, Carrying pistol. (3) 'RCW 9.41.060, Exception. (4) RCW 9.41.070,- Concealed pistol license - Application - Fee - Renewal. (5) RCW 9.41.098, Forfeiture of firearms, order by courts-Return to owner-Confiscation by law enforcement officer. ORD # , PAGE 2 (6) RCW 9.41.100, Dealers to be licensed. (7) RCW 9.41.120, Certain transfers forbidden. (8) new ........ '-- '-- ~ ....... :--- ~--'-: j Y."{' 1 · 1 JU, r tml~U llllUllll,ltlUll IUI UltJ&·ll~ll. (9_8) RCW 9.41.140, Alteration of identifying marks prohibited. (10) RC_.W ............. ' (-1-29)RCW 9.41.230, Aiming or discharging firearms. (-1--310__)RCW 9.41.240, Use of firearms by minor. (-1-41_]_I)RCW 9.41.250, Dangerous weapons -Evidence. (-1-512)RCW 9.41.260, Dangerous exhibitions. (-1-613)RCW 9.41.270, Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm, carrying, exhibiting, displaying or drawing unlawful -Penalty-Exceptions. (-1-714)RCW 9.41.280, Students carrying dangerous weapons on school property. (15)RCW9.41.300, Weapons prohibited in certain places - Local laws and ordinances - Exceptions - Penalty. ORD # ., PAGE 3 Section 4. Article VII, Section 6-161 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-161 Frauds and swindles. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.04.010, False advertising. L~I RCW 9.12.010, Barrat~ (3) RCW 9.12.020, Buying, demanding, or promising reward by district iudge or deputy. (~ 4) RCW 9.45.060, Encumbered, leased or rented personal property.. (9 5_) RCW 9.45.070, Mock auctions. (4 6) RCW 9.45.080, Fraudulent removal of property. (5 7) RCW 9.45.090, Knowingly receiving fraudulent conveyance. (6 8) RCW 9.45.100, Fraud in assignment for benefit of creditors. ,,-, '"'""'" ~" ~'~" Fi-and '-- -"'-:--: ..... ' '-' .......... ' ....... " ' Lg_) RCW 9.26A. 120, Fraud in operating coin-box telephone or other receptacle... (10) RCW 9.26A. 130, Penalty for manufacture or sale of slugs to used for coin. (11) RCW 9.60.010, Definitions. (-H-12__)RCW 9A.60.040, Criminal impersonation. (-1--213)RCW 9A.60.050, False certification. Section 5. Article VII, Section 6-190 is amended as follows: ORD # , PAGE 4 Sec. 6-190 Custodial interference. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions and deletions, are hereby adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9A.40.010, Definitions. (~2) RCW 9A.40.070, Custodial interference in the second degree. (~ 3) RCW 9A.40.080, Custodialinterference-Assessment of costs-Defense-Consent Defenses, restricted. Section 6. Article IX, Section 6-211 is repealed as follows: ...... h k d ...... ~. ...................... l llU IUIIUWIII~ ~td~tU ~LO~%LiLU~ III¢IUUIII~ all ItittiiU CilIIUIIUIIIUIIt~, d, LIUltlOll~ (4) ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ,~ .... , ............. ~ .......... ~ ..... , ......... ~_ (7) ~ ~"' ~ ..... ~ ........ : .... O~ ~ , ~tGE ~ (11) RCW" ..... ~ ........ : .... " ....................... Section 7. P~'tklc I×, Section 6-212 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-212. Malicious mischief and obscuring identity of machines. Thc following state statutes, including all ~uturc an'~cndmcnts, additions or deletions, arc adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9A.48.090, Malicious mischief in the third degree. (2) RCW 9A.48.100(1), Malicious mischief and physical damage defined. (3) RCW 9A.48.110, Defacing a state monument. ~ RCW 9A.56.180, Obscuring identity of a machine. Section 8. Article X, Section 6-237 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-237. Indecent Exposure. (a) A person is guilty of indecent exposure if he or she intentionally makes any open and. obscene exposure of his person or her person or the person of another knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm. (b) Indecent exposure is a misdemeanor unless such person exposes himself or herself to a person under the age of 14 years in which case indecent exposure if gross misdemeanor on the first offense. ORD # ., PAGE 6 Section 9. Article X, Section 6-238 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-238. Location of performers providing certain forms of entertainment restricted. No entertainer shall appear in any public place while unclothed or with any portion of the buttocks, genitals, pubic region or female breasts exposed, except upon a stage or other surface raised at least 18 inches above the level of the floor upon which the closest patrons are seated or standing, nor closer than six eight feet from the nearest patron. Any violation of this section is a misdemeanor. Section 10. Article X, Section 6-239 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-239 Prostitution - Unlawful acts, penalty. (a) It is unlawful for anyone: (1) Intentionally engage in or offer or agree to engage in an act of prostitution: (2) Intentionally secure or offer to secure another for the purpose of engaging .~. act of prostitution; (3) To intentionally transport a person into or within the city with the purpose cf promoting that person's engaging in an act of prostitution, or procuring or paying for transportation with that purpose; (4) Intentionally receive, offer or agree to receive a person into any place ~ building for the purpose of performing an act of prostitution, or to knowing? permit another to remain there for any such purpose; (5) Intentionally direct a person to any place for the purpose of engaging in m act of prostitution; or (6) Intentionally in any way aid, abet or participate in an act of prostitution; ORD # ., PAGE 7 (7) Remain in or near any street, sidewalk, alleyway or other place open to the public with the intent of engaging in, inducing, enticing, soliciting or procuring a person to commit an act of prostitution. Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether the actor intends such prohibited conduct are: a. That the actor is a known prostitute or panderer. b. The actor repeatedly beckons to, stops or attempts to stop, or engages passersby in conversation, or repeatedly stops or attempts to stop motor vehicle operators by hailing, waving of arms or- any other bodily gesture. c. The actor circles an area in a motor vehicle and repeatedly beckons to, contacts, or attempts to stop pedestrians. d. The actor inquires whether a potential patron, procurer or prostitute. is a police officer, searches for articles that would identify a police officer, or request the touching or exposing of genitals or female breasts to prove that the person is not a police officer. (8)Intentionally enter or remain in any area of prostitution area of prostitution in violation of a condition of probationsentence. (9) Intentionally permitting prostitution if, having possession or control of premises which he knows are being used for prostitution purposes, he fails without lawful excuse to make reasonable effort to halt or abate such use. (b) Prostitution or permitting prostitution is a misdemeanor. Section 11. Article X, Section 6-243 is amended as follows: ORD # , PAGE 8 Sec. 6-243 Sexual exploitation of children and minor access to erotic materials. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are hereby adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.68A.011, Definitions (2) (3) RCW 9.68A.080, Processors of depictions of minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct - Report required. .... ,-, .......... R¢cov¢i¢- of costs .....:' by ---' .... ~,U.] J.kb YY JoUO.t'~. i .~, UI BI.ilL IIIIIIUI. (?) RCW 9.,~o,-,.1 (83_) RCW 9.65A.1 $0, Allowing a minor on premises of live erotic performance. (94) RCW 9.68A. 160, Penalty. ORD # , PAGE 9 Section 12. Article X, new sections are added as follows.: Sec. 6-245. Obscenity and pornography. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are hereby adopted by reference: (1). RCW 9.68.015, Obscene literature, shows, etc. - Exemptions. ~ RCW 9.68.030.~ Indecent articles, etc. (3) RCW 9.68.050, "Erotic material" - Definitions. (4) RCW 9.68.060(1)(2)(3)(a)(b)(c)(d)(i)(ii), "Erotic material" - Determination by court - Labeling - Penalties. ~l RCW 9.68.070, Prosecution for violation of RCW 9.68.060 - Defense. (6) RCW 9.68.080, Unlawful acts. LTl RCW 9.68.090, Civil liability of wholesaler or wholesaler-distributor. 8(~ RCW 9.68.100~ Exceptions to RCW 9.68.050 through 9.68.120. (9) RCW 9.68.110, Motion picture operator or projectionist exempt, when. (10) RCW 9.68.120, Provisions of RCW 9.68.050 through 9.68.120 exclusive. (11) RCW 9.68.130, "Sexually explicit material" - Defined - Unlawful display. Sec. 6-246 Stay Out of Areas of Prostitution Orders. L~I Stay out of areas of prostitution orders, hereinafter known as "SOAP" orders, may be issued by the Federal Way Municipal Court to anyone charged with prostitution or permitting prostitution under Section 6-239 FWCC as a condition of pre-trial release. bLb3 SOAP orders may be issued by the Federal Way Municipal Court to anyone convicted ORD # ., PAGE 10 of prostitution or permitting prostitution under Section 6-239 FWCC as a condition of sentence. (c) Whenever a police officer shall have probable cause to believe that a person has received a SOAP order as pre-trial release or a condition of sentence, and the violation or failure to comply with any requirement or restriction imposed by the court as a condition of such pre-trial release or condition of sentence is observed by the officer, such officer may arrest the violator without warrant or other process for violation of the SOAP order pursuant to subsection (g) of this section, and bring such person before the court issuing the order. (d) The SOAP order shall warn the person named in the order to stay out of the following "high risk prostitution area": f.D The entire area which extends one thousand feet (1000') east of and one thousand feet (1000') west of an inclusive of State Route 99, also known as. Pacific Highway, throughout the city limits of Federal Way. (This shall extend from the northmost city line to the southmost city line.) ~ A person is deemed to have notice of the SOAP order when: (1) The signature of the person named in the order or his/her attorney is affixed to the bottom of the order, signifying that he/she have read the order and have knowledge of the contents of the order; or ~l The order recites that the person named in the order or the person's attorney appeared in person before the court. (f) The written SOAP order shall contain the court's directive and shall bear the legend: "Violation of this order is a criminal offense under Section 6-236 FWCC and will ORD # , PAGE 11 subject the violator to arrest.'~ Whenever a SOAP order is issued under this section, and the p~rson named in the' order knows of the order, a violation of the provisions of the order is misdemeanor. Section 13. Article XI, Section 6-268 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-268. Obstructing justice, criminal assistance, introducing contraband and related offenses. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are hereby adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.69.100, Withholding knowledge of felony involving-violence- Penalty. (2) RCW 9A.72.010, Definitions. (3) RCW 9A.72.040, False sweating. (4) RCW 9A.72.060, False swearing-Retraction. (5) RCW 9A.72.070, False swearing-Irregularities-No defense. (6) RCW 9A.72.080, Statement of what one does not know to be true. (7) RCW 9A.72.140, Jury tampering. (8) RCW 9A.72.150, Tampering with physical evidence. (9) RCW 9A.76.010, Definitions. (10) RCW 9A.76.020, Obstructing a public servant. (101) RCW 9A.76.030, Refusing to summon aid for a peace officer. (1-1-2) RCW 9A.76.040, ,Resisting arrest. (1~3) RCW 9A.76.050, Rendering criminal assistance-Definition of terms. (1~34) RCW 9A.76.060, Relative defined. ORD # ., PAGE 12 (145_) RCW 9A.76.080, Rendering criminal assistance in the second degree. (156) RCW 9A.76.090, Rendering criminal assistance in the third degree. (167) RCW 9A.76.100, Compounding (198) RCW 9A.76.160, Introducing contraband in the third degree. (189_) RCW 9A.76.170(1)(2)(d), Bail Jumping (-1-92__Q0) RCW 9A.76.175, Making a false or misleading statement to a public servant. (201) RCW 9A.84.040, False reporting. Section 14. Article XI, a new section is added as follows: Sec. 6-272. Abuse of Office. The following state statute, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, is hereby adopted by reference: RCW 9A.80.010. Section 15. Article XII, Section 6-291 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-291. Disorderly conduct. (a) A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if he or she: (1) Uses abusive language and thereby intentionally creates a risk of assault; (2) Intentionally disrupts any lawful assembly or meeting of persons without authority; (3) Intentionally obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic without lawful authority; or_. (4) IJmt (b) Disorderly conduct is a misdemeanor. Section 16. Article XII, Section 6-293 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-293. Privacy, violating right of. ORD # , PAGE 13 The following state statutes, including all amendments, additions and deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.73.010, Divulging telegram. (2) RCW 9.73.020, Opening sealed letter. (3) RCW 9.73.030, Intercepting, recording or divulging private communication -Consent required-Exceptions. (4) RCW 9.73.070, Same-persons and activities excepted. (5) RCW 9.73.080, Intercepting, recording, or divulging communication - Penalty ~.) RCW 9.73.090, Police and fire personnel exempted from RCW-9.73.030- 9.73.080 Standards. (7) RCW 9.73.095, Intercepting, recording, or divulging inmate conversations - Conditions - Notice. ~ RCW 9.73.100, Recordings available to defense counsel. (9) RCW 9.73.110, Intercepting, recording, or disclosing private communications - Not unlawful for building owner - Conditions. ORD # , PAGE 14 Section 17. Article XII, Section 6-294 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-294. Libel and slander. The following state statutes, including all amendments, additions and deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.58.010, Libel, what constitutes. (2) RCW 9.58.020, How justified or excused - Malice, when presumed. (3) RCW9.58.030, Publication defined. (4) RCW 9.58..040, Liability of editors and others. (5) RCW 9.58.050, Report of proceedings privileged. (6) RCW 9.58.070, Privileged communications. (7) RCW 9.58.080, Furnishing libelous information. (8) RCW 9.58.090, Threatening to publish libel. (9) RCW 9.58.1{)10, Slander of ,- ~,~l,~,~ woman. (10) RCW 9.58.120, Testimony necessary to convict. .Section 18. Article XIII, Section 6-316 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-316. Conduct prohibited. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.91.010, Denial of civil rights - Terms defined. (2) RCW 9.91.020, Operating railroad, steamboat, vehicle, etc., while intoxicated. (3) RCW 9.91.025, Unlawful bus conduct. (4) RCW 9.91.110, Metal buyers - Records of purchases- Penalty. (5) RCW 9.03.010, Abandoning, discarding refrigeration equipment. (6) RCW 9.03.020, Permitting unused equipment to remain on premises. ORD # , PAGE 15 (7) RCW 9.03.030, Violation of RCW 9.03.010 or 9.03.020. (8) RCW 9.03.040, Keeping or storing equipment for sale. (9) RCW 42.20.010 Powers may not be delegated for profit. (10) RCW 42.20.030 Intrusion into and refusal to surrender public office. (11) RCW 42.20.050 Public officer making false certificate. (12) RCW 42.20.060 Falsely auditing and paying claims. (13) RCW 42.20.080 Other violations by officers (14) RCW 42.20.100 Failure of duty by public officer is misdemeanor. (15) RCW 46.61.685, Leaving children unattended in standing vehicle with motor running - Penalty. Section 19. Article XIII, Section 6-318 is amended as follows: Sec. 6-318. Injury to animals. Any pei-soii ---' ..... The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.08.020, Diseased animals. (2) RCW 9.08.030, False certificate of registration of animals - False representation as to breed. 3L~ RCW 9.08.065, Definitions. ~ RCW 9.08.070(1).(2), Pet animals - Taking, concealing, injuring, killing, etc. - Penalty. Section 20. Article XIII, three new sections are added as follows: ORD # , PAGE 16 Sec. 6-321. Juries, crimes relating to. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: LD RCW 9.51.010, Misconduct of officer drawing jury. (2) RCW 9.51.020, Soliciting jury_ du _ty. 3L~ RCW 9.51.030 Misconduct of officer in charge of jury. Sec. 6-322. Duty of witnesses. RCW 9.69.100, including all future amendments or deletions, are adopted by reference. Sec. 6-323. Interference with Health Care Facilities or Providers. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9A.50.005 Finding. (2) RCW 9A.50.010 Definitions. (3) RCW 9A.50.020 Interference with health care facility. (4) RCW 9A.50.030 Penalty. (5) RCW 9A.50.060 Informational picketing. (6) RCW 9A.50.070 Protection of health care patients and providers. (7) RCW 9A.50.900 Construction. ORD # , PAGE 17 Section 21. Two new Articles are added to Chapter 6 of the Criminal Code. ARTICLE XIV. PUBLIC NUISANCE Sec, 6-340. Public nuisance. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: (1) RCW 9.66.010, Public nuisance. (2) RCW 9.66.020, Unequal damage. (~l RCW 9.66.030, Maintaining or permitting nuisance. 4(3) RCW 9.66.040, Abatement of nuisance. (5) RCW 9.66.050, Deposit of unwholesome substance Secs. 6-341 - 6-350. Reserved. ARTICLE XV. GAMBLING Sec. 6-351. Gambling. The following state statutes, including all future amendments, additions or deletions, are adopted by reference: LLI RCW 9.46.010, Legislative declaration. ~) RCW 9.46.0201, "Amusement game:. 3L~ RCW 9.46.0205, "Bingo". (4) RCW 9.46.0209, "Bona fide charitable or nonprofit organization". (5) RCW 9.46.0213, "Bookmaking".. L6_) RCW 9.46.0217, "Commercial stimulant". ~ RCW 9.46.0221, "Commission". (8) RCW 9.46.0225, "Contest of chance". ORD # , PAGE 18 9L~ RCW 9.46.0229, "Fishing derby". (10) RCW 9.46.0233, "Fund raising event". (11) RCW 9.46.0237, "Gambling". (12) - RCW 9.46.0241, "Gambling device". (13) RCW 9.46.0245, "Gambling information". (14) RCW 9.46.0249, "Gambling premises", (15) RCW 9.46.0253, "Gambling record". (16) RCW 9.46.0257, "Lottery". (17) RCW 9.46.0261, "Member," "bona fide member". (18) RCW 9.46.0264, "Player". (19) RCW 9.46.0269, "Professional gambling". (20) RCW 9.46.0273, "Punch boards~" "pull-tabs". (21) RCW 9.46.0277, "Raffle". (22) RCW 9.46.0282, "Social card game". (23) RCW 9.46.0285, "Thing of value". (24) RCW 9.46.0289, "Whoever," "person". (25) RCW 9.46.222~ Professional gambling in the third degree. Secs. 6-351 - 6-360. Reserved. Section 22. SeverabiliW. If any section, sentence, clause orphrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 23. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective ORD # ., PAGE 19 date of his ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 24. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective September 10, 2000, which is at least five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary consisting of the title hereto. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of ., 2000. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MIKE PARK ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ORD # , PAGE 20 APPROVED AS TO FORM: INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. K:\ORDINXcirminalupdate3.oo Revised 07-29-00 ORD # ., PAGE 21 August 30, 2000 ACm: Chris Greene City of Federal Way Clerk 33530 1~t Way South Federal Way, WA 98023 Subj.: SOAP Ordinance along Pacific Highway South This letter is in reference to the illegal activity in from of DJ Trophy located at 3 3110 Pacific Highway South. Over the last few years there has been prostitution and drag dealing in our parking lot and in front of other surrounding businesses in the area. Each year the problem gets worse and we are told that there is nothing that can be done. Every summer when the sun first shines all the prostitutes and transient drag dealers start hanging arounc[ We have tried the community meetings and block watches and the problem goes away shortly but it is not solution to the problem. It is time to move to the next step and try something new to resolve the issue. We at DJ Trophy support the SOAP Ordinance as the next step in resolving this issue. It has worked for other cities and it can work for us to. The illegal activity in front of our store is starting to affect our business, ladies have approached customers and others just won't come in the area after dark in fear of their safety. We have seen drag paraphernalia (example used needles) in the back of our parking lot by our dumpsters. The prostitutes are a problem and a nuisance but the pimps and drag dealers scare people away from the area. They hang out in front of the store and across the street at Ernie Track Stop carrying on theft "business". ff we don't stop this problem it is just going to keep moving north up Pacific Highway to the downtown core. Thank you for your time and aid in helping us solve this problem. Enclosed along with this letter are some pictures of the activity in the area. 33110 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, WA 98003 DJ Trophy Awards & Engraving 33110 Pacific Highway So. Federal Way, WA 98003 253-874-2665 August 31, 2000 Chris Green City of Federal Way Clerk 33530 1st Ave. So Federal Way, WA 98023 Subj.: Prostitution and drug dealing Dear Chris, I would like to start by thanking the Federal Way Police Department for their excellent efforts in trying to keep our business community safe and free from illegal prostitution and drug dealing. For the past 14 years DJ Trophy has been located at 33110 Pacific Highway So., as business owner and long time citizen of Federal Way I am concerned that this area between 340th and 330th Pacific Highway So. has a great potential of becoming or has become the cities skid row. We are now in the process of negotiating a five year lease with a five year option, but if the city is unable to implement the SOAP ordinance we will be forced to relocate. As the owner I have the responsiblity to my employees and customers to make my business a safe and decent place for them to work and shop. Federal Way City has a great opportunity to show this community of drug dealers and prostitutes that we will not tolerate or stand for this type of behavior in our city. On a regular basis my employee JoAnna Westlind and I call 911 to report prostitution pickups in front of our store. The police respond quickly, but the prostitutes and drug dealers return.. With Celebration Park so close, it would seem reasonable that the city do all it can to clean up this area. I have been a citizen of this community since 1949 and I want to be proud of this city, not ashamed. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ~,/ Janice H. Pool Owner DJ Trophy Awards & engraving I favor clustering where the conditions are right. However, there can be unintended consequences when clustering is used without consideration of environmental factors. An example is a development that has been proposed for the east end of Mirror Lake. Clustering was proposed to compensate for the wetland setback requirements. The result was that, even though the setback was preserved, so were all the negative environmental impacts. In addition to water quality considerations, Mirror Lake has a water quantity problem. There has been residential flooding to some degree in two of the last five years. What clustering did was preserve all the impervious surfaces--roofs and driveways--and the same sources of pollutants. The depth of the setback isn't sufficient to allow infiltration to ground water, so clustering assures that the full burden of the surface water from the development is felt by the lake. This compounds the lake residents' problems during periods of heavy, sustained rain and has the effect of offsetting the benefits provided by the setback. A moratorium might offer a good chance to pause and assure that the requirements for clustering are consistent with requirements to protect the environment.