The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 01-04-2000 Regular , :,:,:,',','1 ';i~: , <';;; ~' ,;, \', ': : ' '. I. TI. ill. IV. v. VI. AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers - City Hall January 4~ 2000 - 7:00 p.m. (www.cí.federal-way.wa.us) ***** CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SWEARING-IN CEREMONY COUNCILMEMBERS-ELECf Mary Gates, Michael Hellickson, Dean McColgan and Michael Park SELECTION AND SWEARING-IN CEREMONY MA YOR AND DEPUTY MA YOR PRESENTATIONS a. b. c. Proclamation/Martin Luther King. Jr. Day City Manager/Introduction of New City Employees City Manager/Emerging Issues CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address Cily Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the podium. adjust the microphone to proper height. and state your name and addressfor the record. PLEASE liMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE ß) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negalively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. over please; . . . VTI. VTII. IX. x. XI. , *:: CONSENT AGENDA (Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought beforefull Councilfor approval,' all items will be enacted by one motion; individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion.) a. b. Minutes/December 21. 1999 Regular Meeting Council Bill #242/Personal Wireless Communication Facilities Code Amendments/ Enactment Ordinance Parks and Recreation Commission Ap.POintment (replacement) Year 2000 Grant Approvals for Solid Waste/Recycling Division of Public Works/ Resolution 2000 Arts Commission Contracts for Services Program Recommendations 2000 Arts Commission Work Plan 1999/2000 Youth Commission Work Plan Panther Lake Neighborhood Traffic Safety Project c. d. e. f. g. h. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Council Committee Preferences CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT ADJOURNMENT * * * PUBLIC RECEPTION FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS * * * .. TIlE COUNCIL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTIlER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON TIlE AGENDA .. " ~':.. MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 ITEM# W-~) ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ,...~y'.~~.ç.T.~.J~}9'...ç~.~.~~~~..M~.~~~.~.g..M~.~.~~~~....... .................. -.. ................................... ....... .................................... ............. ................ .... CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE _BUSINESS HEARING FYI _RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMA TION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ......................................................................................,......,.........,.........."...,..................,............,.................."'........'................... ........................................... ATTACHMENTS: Minutes for December 21, 1999 regular meeting .........................................................'...'..........................'....'.......'..'.........,..........................................................,...............,......... ............................................. SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirement. ......................................................................",...,.""",................",..."......"..................................................,...................................... ............................,......... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a ...............................................................................................,.".......,.........................,..",.......................,...,.............".......,............. ....................,.,."................ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: City Council approval ................................................................................................................,..............................................................,....................... ............................................. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUN~ PACKET: '-- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers - City Hall December 21, 1999 - 7:00 PM DRAFT MINUTES I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Gintz called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of 7:06 PM. Councilmembers present: Mayor Ron Gintz, Deputy Mayor Michael Park, Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Mary Gates, Linda Kochmar, and Phil Watkins. City staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Londi Lindell, and City Clerk Chris Green. ll. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Watkins led the flag salute. ID. PRESENr A TlONS a. City Manager/Introduction of New City Employees City Manager David Moseley announced there were no new employees to introduce this evening. b. City Manager/Emerging Issues Public Works Director Cary Roe updated Council on drainage issues facing the privately owned properties in the Easter Lake area. Mr. Roe referred to a recent memorandum he sent to Council addressing possible causes of the drainage problems; he also responded to a variety of Council member inquiries. The Public Works Department will hold a public meeting on December 23, 1999, from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM, in Council Chambers, City Hall, to guide and inform citizens who live around or near Easter Lake of the potential solutions and costs associated therewith. Mr. Roe also discussed the possibility of scheduling a second informational meeting after the holidays, however, no date has yet been set. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 21, 1999 - Page 2 IV. CITIZEN CO:MMENT Hope Elder thanked Mayor Gintz and Council member Dovey for their commitment and dedication to the citizens of Federal Way during their terms of office. She expressed gratitude for the many hours they have spent trying to make a difference, including the behind-the-scene details and citizen concerns they've addressed on a daily basis. Pilar LeMay introduced herself as a newly appointed member of the Diversity Commission, and stated it is a pleasure to serve on the commission. She noted the Diversity Commission is currently working on the Martin Luther King Jr. celebration scheduled for January 17, 2000. Paul Wham spoke regarding the 21.36 acres of land the Federal Way National Little League currently possesses. He distributed material to Councilmembers, including an outline of the Federal Way National Little League's proposal to gift the land to the city in exchange for certain stipulations. He urged the city to review and accept this proposal before the February 1, 2000 deadline set by the Federal Way National Little League. Councilmembers requested the City Manager schedule discussion on the league's proposal during their upcoming retreat in January. H. David Kaplan responded to the proposal by the Federal Way National Little League, and expressed prior concerns of the Parks and Recreation Commission; he noted the Commission has compiled a list of pros and cons they would like Council to consider regarding the league's current proposal. v. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 1. , J. k. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Minutes/December 7. 1999 Regular Meeting - Approved Voucher/December 21. 1999 - Approved Monthly Financial Report/Month of November 1999 - Approved Council Bill #239/Criminal Code Amendment/Enactment Ordinance Approved Ordinance #99-362 Council Bill #240/ Adult Uses Code Amendment/Enactment Ordinance Approved Ordinance #99-361 Council Bill #241/Natural Gas or Manufactured Gas Use Tax/Enactment Ordinance Approved Ordinance #99-360 Year 2000 Right-of-Way Landscape Maintenance Contract Award - Approved 2000 Vadis Northwest/Litter Removal Contract - Approved So 3121h St/SR99 to 23rd Ave So Street Improvements Project - Approved SR99 at So 330th St Intersection Improvements/95 % Design - Approved So 3201h St & SR99 Widening & Intersection Improvements/85 % Design - Approved 2000 Commute Trip Reduction Act Interlocal Agreement with King County/Metro - Approved City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 21, 1999 - Page 3 m. n. King County Waterworks Grant/Formation of Hylebos Stream Team - Approved Capital Facilities Plan Update! Acceleration of "WH ll-CIP-O3 SR99 Storm Drain "- Approved Dumas Bay Centre Janitorial Contract Renewal - Approved 40Ha) Deferred Compensation Plan/Resolution Approved Resolution #99-307 Establish Authorize Signature for Municipal Court Bank Account/Resolution Approved Resolution #99-308 Municipal Court VenuelResolution Approved Resolution #99-309 Renegotiated Interlocal Agreement with FW School District for School Security - Approved o. p. q. r. s. COUNCILMEMBER GATES MOVED APPROV AL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED; DEPUTY MAYOR PARK SECOND. The motion passed as follows: VI. Burbidge Gates Koch mar Watkins Dovey Gintz Park yes yes yes yes yes yes yes CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Extension of Time for Consideration of Lakehaven Comprehensive Wastewater Plan Council member Kochmar recused herself from voting on the Extension of Time for Consideration of Lakehaven Comprehensive Wastewater Plan, due to the fact she is employed by Lakehaven Utility District. COUNCILMEMBER WATKINS MOVED FOR THE TIME TO BE EXTENDED FOR CONSIDERATION OF LAKEHAVEN COMPREHENSIVE WASTEWATER PLAN; COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY SECOND. The motion passed 6-0 as follows: Vll. Burbidge' yes Gates yes Koch mar recused Watkins yes Dovey Gintz Park yes yes yes INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE Council Bill #242/Personal Wireless Communication Facilities/Code Amendment AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, W ASIDNGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 21, 1999 - Page 4 FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SITING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCESSES FOR PERSONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Council member Dovey recused himself from voting on the Personal Wireless Communication Facilities Code Amendment, due to the fact he is in the wireless business. COUNCILMEMBER WATKINS MOVED TO A SECOND READING FOR ENACTMENT AT THE JANUARY 4, 2000 COUNCIL MEETING; COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed 6-0 as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Watkins yes yes yes yes Dovey Gintz Park recused yes yes vm. CITY COUNCa REPORTS Council member Gates (as a member of the Suburban Cities Association Appointment Committee) reminded interested Council members to submit their application form as soon as possible. She also announced the proposed transit cuts to Route 173 have been postponed; however, if the legislature does not provide additional funding for transit services, deeper cuts could possibly be felt in June of 2000. Council member Kochmar reported she attended the last meeting of the Airport Communities Coalition on Wednesday, and reminded Council members to consider appointments to the ACC for the upcoming Year 2000. Councilmember Watkins wished all the best to his departing colleagues, and wished a Merry Christmas to all! Councilmember Burbidge reported on the issues addressed at recent Puget Sound Water Quality and South County Area Transportation Board meetings, including the regional support for Councilmember Gates' reappointment to the Sound Transit Board of Directors. The Suburban Cities Association has also announced its support of her reappointment on the board. Deputy Mayor Park reported the eight visitors from Wonju, Korea had a very pleasant experience visiting city hall, and were very impressed by the hospitality shown by city staff. He also noted that he and Councilmembers Gates, Kochmar and Burbidge recently me.t with Senator Tracey Eide and Representatives Mark Miloscia and Maryann Mitchell regarding upcoming legislative issues. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 21, 1999 - Page 5 Councilmember Dovey reported the Parks/Recreation/ Human Services/Public Safety Committee meeting scheduled for December 27, 1999 has been canceled. He took the opportunity to thank everyone for their support over the past five years he has served on the City Council. He noted he believes the new Council, including the five remaining members and the two new members, will do a great job. He also wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Mayor Gintz spoke to the comments made earlier regarding the National Little League's proposal; he said he believes the new Council will deal fairly with such issues, including the city's limited resources due to the passing of 1-695. He also reflected on his eight years of service, and stated lightheartedly, that he is smarter today than yesterday! He concluded by saying, "despite the fact he is not returning to the City Council, he will not be going away!" IX. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley announced the January 7, 2000, departure of the city's Surface Water Manager Jeff Pratt who recently accepted the position of Deputy Public Works Director with Ventura County, California. The City Manager expressed regret in losing Mr. Pratt, who has worked for the city since 1993; he recognized his many accomplishments, including a national award for the 336th and Kitts Comer project. He congratuláted and wished him well! Mr. Moseley announced plans for the upcoming City Council retreat, which is scheduled for January 7-8, 2000. Facilitator Jim Reid has already interviewed Councilmembers, and is in the process of finalizing key issues for the retreat agenda. He reported the city hosted the Advancing Leadership program last Thursday in Council Chambers, and thanked Council member Gates and Public Safety Director Wood for their part in the event. The City Manager recognized and thanked the city's Wellness Committee for their role in promoting the Adopt-A-Family program for this holiday season, and commended city departments for their overwhelming support in making the holidays much brighter for a number of families. He expressed that it is truly better to give than to receive! He commented on the staff's positive impression of the eight visitors from Wanju, Korea. He noted that all who were involved in the various workshops were impressed with the detail and energy of the visitors. City Manager ¥oseley reminded Council members of the need for a 3D-minute executive session to discuss collective bargaining, as well as an added item to discuss litigation. City Council Regular Meeting Minutes December 21, 1999 - Page 6 x. EXECUfIVE SESSION At 7:55 PM, Mayor Gintz announced an approximate 30-minute executive session to discuss collective bargaining and litigation, with action anticipated. (ADDED) a. b. Collective BargaininglPursuant to RCW 42.30. 1 40(4) (a) Litigation/ Pursuant to RCW 42.31.110 (l)(i) At 8:25 PM, Derek Matheson, Assistant to City Manager, announced the executive session was being extended for an additional 15 minutes. The Council returned to chambers at 8:45 PM, and Mayor Gintz reconvened the regular meeting. COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED RA TIFICA TION OF THE POLICE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION'S COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT; COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SECOND. The motion passed 6-1 as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Watkins yes yes yes no Dovey Gintz Park yes yes yes XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Gintz adjourned the regular meeting at the hour of 8:50 PM. N. Christine Green, CMC City Clerk ...~.~~ !~~ ~..~~ !~~..! ~~~~.~x .~.~.. ~.~.. .......... """"""""""'" ........ ..... ....... ..~.!'.~~~..... .... =:Y. 1/......... kf1.......... ...... ""'" .............................. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENTS PERTAINING TO SITING, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AND REVIEW PROCESSES FOR PERSONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................... CATEGORY: X- CONSENT X- ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI BUDGET IMPACT: - RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................ ATTACHMENTS: November 30, 1999 Staff Report to the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTC) with .. .!!.~~~~i!.~ .~..~~~l?'!:1I.~.. !!.:....... ......... .... ............... ....... ...................... ....... ................ ....................................... ........ ...... """""""" ................... ............................... SUMMARY IBACKGROUND: Attached as Exhibit A are the proposed code amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 (Zoning) pertaining to siting and development standards and review processes for Personal Wireless Service Facilities (PWSFs). These amendments have been heard by the Planning Commission and reviewed by the LUTe. The Planning Commission conducted its first public hearing on the proposed amendments on July 2 I, 1999. The hearing was then continued to August 18, 1999 at which time, the Planning Commission, by a majority vote ...? ~ ~~.~ ..: ~.~ ~.~~ . ~.:!!l. ~ ~ ~~ ~! .e ?.. ~~~ ~.~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~~.~~.. ~~~. . ~. ~ ry..~ ~ ~.~~. ! .1.. ~.~ ~ P.~ ..~~. ~ ..~!!l. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ .f ~~.~.~ ~ ~~ . #.~.. ~.~.. ~~~.? ~ .~.~ ~ ~.:~.: .. . CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the Planning Commission's recommendation during public meetings on September 14, 1999 and three subsequent meetings ending on December 6, 1999. At the December 6, 1999 meeting, the LUTC made a motion to forward the amendments on to the full council for first reading on December 21, 1999 with the addition of the word small shown as double underline and ...~.:~.~~.~~..~~.P.~~~..~~..~~ß~~!~.~.~:.................................................................................................................... ......................................... ........................... CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Approve Council Committee Recommendation. ~;;~~;.~;~~ ;~~~ ~~; ~ ~;;, ~~;;~ ~;¡~~~~~mmmmmmmm (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # ~ if ~ DENIED ORDINANCE # T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION RESOLUTION # /4~ /:J-(-Z//9'i- ~ * l/'f( en .~ ~-Cþ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: November 30, 1999 TO: Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) FROM: Stephen Clifton, AICP, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner ~ L/ ./ Tim McHarg, Contract Senior Planner ~ SUBJECT: Proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) Zoning Code Text Amendments I. BACKGROUND The current City of Federal Way Personal Wireless Services Facilities (PWSF) review process, siting priorities, and development standards were established on September 19, 1997, through the adoption of Ordinance No. 97-300. The PWSF Ordinance was codified as Section 22-967 of the "Federal Way City Code" (FWCC). As part of its regular review of development regulations, staff has identified several aspects of the regulatory framework for PWSFs, which are in need of amendment. This is due largely to rapidly changing telecommunications technology and the resulting siting preferences of the telecommunications industry. Attached, as Exhibit A is a Draft Ordinance, which reflects revisions consistent with the policy direction provided to the staff by the LUTC at the November 15, 1999, meeting. The draft ordinance has been prepared in "line-in/line-out" format, with the Planning Commission's recommendations shown as sil'lgle strikeouts (proposed deletions) and single underline (proposed additions) and the LUTC's recommendations as à8wBl8 strik88wt8 (proposed deletions) and double underlines (proposed additions). The LUTC's revisions are located on pages 16, 19,21, 22, 25, and 26; and these sections are noted as a double vertical line in the right margin. The amendments recommended to be added by the Planning Commission that were subsequently recommended for deletion by the LUTC are shown as a siRgl8 wRà8rliR8 'l:itJi a à8w818 stFil~88wt City ofFederal Way LUTC Report PWSF Zoning Code Text Amendments November 30, 1999 Page 1 The LUTC's recommendations can be summarized as follows: . Within residential zoning districts, Neighborhood Business (BN) zone, and Professional Office (PO) zone), a maximum of one (I) PWSF may be installed on an existing structure within appropriate public rights-of-way. Therefore, PWSFs located in public rights-of-way within these zones shall not be eligible for or required to provide collocation of additional PWSF equipment. . Within residential zoning districts, Neighborhood Business (BN) zone, and Professional Office (PO) zone), equipment enclosures for PWSFs within appropriate public rights-of-way shall be located on adjacent properties outside the right-of-way. If located above ground, the equipment enclosures shall comply with all code requirements, including landscaping, building setbacks, and building codes. II. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION FWCC Chapter 22, Zoning, Article IX, Process VI Review, establishes a process and criteria for zoning code text amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the City Council, based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission, must approve amendments to the zoning code text. III. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION As indicated below in Section IV -- Procedural Summary of this staff report, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed text amendments to the zoning code regarding PWSFs on July 21, 1999. The public hearing was continued to August 18, 1999. After conclusion ofthe continued public hearing, pursuant to FWCC Section 22- 535, the Planning Commission considered the proposed zoning code text amendments in light of the decisional criteria outlined below in Section Vofthis report. By a unanimous vote of the membership present (5-0), the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the zoning code text amendments regarding PWSFs as outlined in Exhibit B. Attached as Exhibit C are the Planning Commission's minutes of July 21, 1999, and August 18,1999. City of Federal Way LUTC Report PWSF Zoning Code Text Amendments November 30, 1999 Page 2 IV. PROCEDURAL SUMMARY July 21, 1999: Planning Commission Public Hearing August 18, 1999: Continuation of Planning Commission Public Hearing September 14, 1999: LUTC Meeting November 4, 1999: LUTC Meeting November 15, 1999: LUTC Field Trip to View Existing PWSFs LUTC Meeting December 6, 1999: L UTC Meeting For background purposes, materials previously provided for the September 14, 1999, LUTC meeting and the November 4 and 15, LUTC meetings have been placed in binders and are available for review in the City Council Conference Room. V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWCC Section 22-523 provides criteria for zoning code text amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance of the proposed PWSF zoning code text amendment with the criteria provided by FWCC Section 22-523. The city may amend the text of Chapter 22, Zoning, only if it finds that: (I) The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The proposed zoning code text amendments regarding PWSFs are consistent with, and substantially implement, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUG2 Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a public/private partnership. LUP4 Maximize efficiency of the development review process. City of Federal Way LUTC Report PWSF Zoning Code Text Amendments November 30, 1999 Page 3 LUP6 PUG 2 PUG 4 PUP] PUP 4 PUP 17 PUP 19 Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the development review process. Work with private utility companies to allow them to provide service in a way that balances cost-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. Ensure that development regulations are consistent with public service obligations imposed upon private utilities by Federal and State Law. The City should work to encourage, to the extent possible, the supply of all utilities to existing and new homes, offices, industrial, and commercial buildings. The City encourages the joint use of trenches, conduits, or poles, so that utilities may coordinate expansion, maintenance, and upgrading facilities with the least amount of right-of way disruption. The City should require that site-specific utility facilities such as antennas and sub-stations are reasonably and appropriately sited and screened to mitigate adverse aesthetic impacts. The City should modify the zoning regulations to address the siting, screening, and design standards for wirelesslcellular facilities, sub- stations, and antenna facilities in such a manner as to allow for reasonable and predictable review while minimizing potential land use and visual impacts on adjacent properties. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare; The proposed zoning code text amendments will result in improved environmental and land use review processes, siting prioritization, and development standards for PWSFs, which have a direct relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare. And City of Federal Way LUTC Report PWSF Zoning Code Text Amendments November 30, 1999 Page 4 VI. List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D (3) The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city. The proposed FWCC text amendment will improve the compatibility ofPWSFs with surrounding land uses and minimize land use conflicts between PWSFs and surrounding land uses through appropriate environmental and land use review processes, siting prioritization, and development standards. COUNCIL ACTION Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-537(c), after consideration of the Planning Commission report, and at its discretion holding its own public hearing, the City Council shall by majority vote of its total membership take the following action: 1. Approve the proposed zoning code text amendment by ordinance; 2. Modify and approve the proposed zoning code text amendment by ordinance; 3. Disapprove the proposed zoning code text amendment by resolution; or 4. Remand the proposed zoning code text amendment back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings. If this occurs, the City Council shall specify the time within which the Planning Commission shall report back to the City Council on the proposed zoning code text amendment. Draft Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code Text Planning Commission Recommendation July 21 and August 18, 1999, Planning Commission Minutes Distribution List I:\TELECOM\1115StaffReport.doc City of Federal Way LUTC Report PWSF Zoning Code Text Amendments November 30, 1999 Page 5 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SITING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCESSES FOR PERSONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICA nON FACILITIES WHEREAS, Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 preserves local zoning authority over decisions regarding the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities; and, WHEREAS, personal wireless services facilities comprise a rapidly growing segment of the utilities and communications sector and have merit and value for the community and region as a whole; and, WHEREAS, personal wireless services facilities are supportive of the public health, safety, and welfare in that they provide useful portable communication services for personal convenience, business, and emergency purposes; and, WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way is concerned that future decisions regulating the siting and development of personal wireless services facilities, without appropriate standards and review processes, may adversely effect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents of the City of Federal Way; and, WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-216 authorizes amendments to the Land Use Code using Process VI; and E}{H~B~~ ß PAGE I OF ~).. ORDINANCE NO. ,PAGE I January 4, 2000 WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way reviewed potential impacts from the Personal Wireless Services Facilities Code Amendment Ordinance in compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act; and, WHEREAS, the Personal Wireless Services Facilities Code Amendment Ordinance will implement and is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and meets the criteria of Process VI; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the draft Personal Wireless Services Facilities Code Amendment Ordinance and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, IN REGULAR SESSION, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings of Fact. A. The proposed zoning code text amendments regarding PWSFs are consistent with, and substantially implement, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUG2 LUP4 LUP6 PUG 2 PUG 4 PUP 3 ORDINANCE NO. Develop an efficient and timely development review process based on a public/private partnership. Maximize efficiency of the development review process. Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the development review process. Work with private utility companies to allow them to provide service in a way that balances cost-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. Ensure that development regulations are consistent with public service obligations imposed upon private utilities by Federal and State Law. The City should work to encourage, to the extent possible, the supply of all utilities to existing and new homes, offices, industrial, and commercial buildings. EXHIB~T A rr ~E ~uaOFooo 5~ , PAGE 2 PUP 4 The City encourages the joint use of trenches, conduits, or poles, so that utilities may coordinate expansion, maintenance, and upgrading facilities with the least amount of right-of-way disruption. PUP 17 The City should require that site-specific utility facilities such as antennas and sub-stations are reasonably and appropriately sited and screened to mitigate adverse aesthetic impacts. PUP 19 The City should modify the zoning regulations to address the siting, screening, and design standards for wireless/cellular facilities, sub- stations, and antenna facilities in such a manner as to allow for reasonable and predictable review while minimizing potential land use and visual impacts on adjacent properties. B. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare, because the proposed zoning code text amendments will result in improved environmental and land use review processes, siting prioritization, and development standards for PWSFs. C. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city. The proposed FWCC text amendment will improve the compatibility of PWSFs with surrounding land uses and minimize land use conflicts between PWSFs and surrounding land uses through appropriate environmental and land use review processes, siting prioritization, and development standards. Section 2. Section 22-1 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to incorporate the following definitions in alphabetical order: Abandoned versonal wireless service facility shall mean a PWSF that meets the following: (1) Operation has voluntarily ceased for a period of 60 or more consecutive days: or. (2) The effective radiated power of an antenna has been reduced by 75 percent for a period of 60 or more consecutive davs: or. (3) The antenna has been relocated at a point less than 80 percent of the height of the support structure: Of. ,PAGE 3 f...r., ",n..-,..... ~ 3 --- ft- January 4, 2000 % 3 ~ --- ORDINANCE NO. (4) The number of transmissions from an antenna has been reduced by 75 percent for a period of 60 or more consecutive days. Cell-on-Wheels (C-O-W) shall mean a mobile temporary personal wireless service facility. Temporarv Personal Wireless Service Facility shall mean a personal wireless service facility which is to be placed in use for a limited period of time. is not deployed in a permanent manner. and does not have a permanent foundation. ORDINANCE NO. , PAGE 4 EXHIBIT Janu!:4,2o00 PAGEL OF 3J- ;gm G)~ mffi 1 \) wc-,-; I' -=c- ~l w ! '""¡ i Section 3. Section 22-614 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-614. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the suburban estate (SE) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See note ~ 4 for allowed ~ PWSFs USE u R E G U L A T I 0 N S ~ Process See note 2 ORDINANCE NO. USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down 10 find use, , , THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS Ln~um.o - - LOT SIZE I ~~ I ~ I MAXIMUM ~9' 'Ell ',GIi --¡¡¡¡¡a¡::¡:¡: FRONT SIDE LANDSCAPE REAR SIGNS PARKING SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES See note I Refer to Seëi1OO22- 967for maximum heiahts for allowed tV1>CS of ~ Not allowed on a PWSF See note I See note I See note I N/A I. lIi.i. ~lUo"~lUai....no¡;'rth..i_o iI1hoill...aJolI"""h..~erl,' 811O1i'8fa _I.fthalio"" ~, Not III>plicable, PWSFo allowed on existina structures only 2, The review process used will be .. follows: 0, Pru,,"-IIJ ifd.. p'Y~r ......tho uderl,ino loilllli..il, h, !'No_III if!taVn'Sf io o.II....d., an.. '!li.SpmEr .r'.4liol, ..o~o~ a........~ iol_III.., I§' alia a tho allio~.s IMi!',} .r O~-J"'ra, a, Subiect to meetina all applicable development standards. Process III for the followina proposals: i The PWSF is collocated on an exisbna PWSF and is les, than IS' above the existina facility; or. ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riJl/lt-<>f-way and is I... than IS' above the structure: or. iii The PWSF is located on an exi"inutructure in the BPA trail and is less than IS' above the existina structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an exi"ina structure in an appropriate public riaht-<>f-way and is I... than IS' above the exi"ina structure. plus any heiaht aranted under Chapter 22-967(b), b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22. Anicle 11, Divioion g for the followina proposals, i The PWSF is collocated on an exisbna PWSF and is more than IS' above the exi"ina facility; or. ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riJl/lt-<>f-way and is more than 15' above the structure; or. iii, The PWSF is located on an exisbna structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existina structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existina structure in an appropriate public riaht-<>f-way and is more than 15' above the existina structure. plus any heiaht wanted under Chapter 22-967(b), c, All other types and locations ofPWSFs are not allowed, ),gil!'o..a.a'alla a~a.aVn'~r, 4), All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Anicle XVII and the provisions of the PWSF d~elopment regulations, At a minimum, §!.e"a five (5) foot Type llllandscapinS!œ! shall be required!!!!!!!!!!.!!!! facility. unless the community development services director detennines that the facility is adequately screened, ~, goo E..,io L 3) 9H(0), tloto, New free-standina PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shall be""" allowed!!!!!r on existing towers. .... on publicly used structures not located in public riahts-<>f-way. on existina structures located '" the BPA trail. and on existina structures in appropriate public riJlhts-<>f-way, Refer to Section 22.967 for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs, ~ See note 41 &eo -.; See note 2 , PAGE 5 November 30, 1999 Section 4. Section 22-649 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-649. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the single-family residential (RS) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) u R E G U L A T I 0 ~I ~ Process See note 2 See note ~ 4 for allowed types of PWSFs ~~ GJ '4:1 m 001 f;1 O' ï1~ Þ ¡ ORDINANCE NO. cp, I LOT SIZE FRONT See note See note I MiN1MDMs REQUIRED YARDS SIDE See note I , PAGE 6 ,..~nnn'< DIRECTIONS: FIRST. read down to find use . . . TIlEN, across for REGULA nONS USE ZONE CHART - - REAR w:¡: I MAXIMUM Cg' 'ER . c¡¡ """"HEiGHT See note I --.+ Refer to Sëcti0022- 967 for maximum hei!!hts for allowed types of ~ See note 2 LANDSCAPE See note 42 SIGNS PARKING I ~~ I SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES See ....- N/A I. fli.i. _I LS" ~ "illu. sr. ~\... i,... ill h. i, a.. IA.. .. '" ~'dft~..I) 'I A'" ;, sl'or .oh oftk.listed ~ Not applicoble, PWSFs allowed on existin!! structures onlv, 2, The review process used will be as follows: a, P "... III if~..pn'Er IOU" 11-. .ft~..I,i,S h.iShlliftlil. h, P,o._1lI ifll-. pm~r i. .ollooalo~' .. ."isliftS p"'Er or ~ hl;.I) ...~ ...."'ro.. ~ i.l... ~I". I§' alto . 11-. ."iOli.S raeilil) or ....1"'., a, Subiect to meetin!! all applicable development standards, Process III for the followin!! proposals: i The PWSF is collocated on an exist;n!! PWSF and is less than IS' above the existin!! facility; or. ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a publ;c ri¡¡ht-of-wav and is less than 15' above the structure: or. iii, The PWSF is located on an existin!! structure in the BPA trail and is less than 15' above the existin!! structure: or. iv, The PWSF is located on an existin!! structure in an appropriate public ri¡¡ht-of.wav and is less than 15' above the existin!! structure, plus any hei!!ht !!ranted under Chapter 22-967(b) b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin!! proposals i, The PWSF is collocated on an exist;n!! PWSF and is more than 15' above the existin!! facility: or, ii The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri!!ht-of-wav and is more than 15' above the structure: or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existin!! structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existin!! structure: or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin!! structure in an appropriate public ri!!ht-of-wav and is more than 15' above the existin!! structure, plus any hei!!ht wanted under Chapter 22-967(b), c, All other types and locations of PWSFs are not allowed, ], Ei8' H.St .Iollo .~ 0' a p"'Er, 43, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF dõvelopment regulations, At a minimum, ~a five (5) foot Type IlIlandscaping!œ! shall be required ~ facility. unless the community development services director detennines that the facility is adequately screened, ~, Sa. E.stiar a3 ~U(.), tis"', New free-standin!! PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shall be""¡" allowed 2!!!r on existing towers, ..,.¡ on publicly used structures not located in publ;c ri¡¡hts-of.wav. on existin!! structures located in the BPA trail. and on existin!! structures in appropriate public ri!!hts-of.wav, Refer to Section 22.967 for development standards applicable to allowed tvpes ofPWSF" Not allowed on a PWSF November 30, 1999 Section 5. Section 22-681 ofthe Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-681. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the multifamily residential (RM) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE R E G U L A T I 0 N S ---- - REAR USE ZONE CHART ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down 10 find use, ' , TIlEN, across for REGULA nONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS u LOT SIZE bQ.¡: I MAXIMUM C9\11I1'£[ HEIGHT Process LANDSCAPE SIGNS FRONT PARKING SIDE Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See note 2 Refer to Sëctiõñ22- 967 for maximum hei¡¡hts for allowed types of ~ See note I See note I See note I See note I - See note 42 See ~ Not allowed on a PWSF See nole ~ 4 for allowed types of PWSFs See note 2 ;g~ øæ 1~21 r r! 0)1,: , I -r:~ ~ ORDINANCE NO, , PAGE 7 I ~ I SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES N/A I. lliai/IL_","an4/ILlli 1 "f..IIi...itl"," iIIk.i. _JJllutolkoKnillll,i",...i.SÑ,..,hof'hli"d ~ Not applicable, PWSF, allowed on existina ,tructures only, 2, The review proces, used will be as follows: a, ProBloem if tho r"'sr 1 ....1100 Kdlll,i.s hoiSI" li",il. k, p......m if It 0 P"'EF il ..lIooauJ e. an IlIi"il" r"'sr !I ~""Iill) tII.J Ihe,."....4 il 1_1Iwt I!' aile e ' It. IlIi.",... f88ili'l er.~ _1111.., a, Subject to meetioa oil applicable development ,tanderds. Process m for the followina propooalo: i, The PWSF is collocated on an exi,tina PWSF and is less than IS' above the exislina facility: or. ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used 'tructure not located in a public ri¡¡ht-of-way and is less than 15' above the structure; or. iii, The PWSF is located on an e,islina structure in the BP A trail and is less than IS' above the existina structure; or. iv, The PWSF is located on an e,islina structure in an appropriate public ri¡¡ht-of.way and is less than IS' above the exislina structure, plus any hei¡¡ht IUlllted under Chapter 22-967(b), b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II. Division 8 for the followina proposals: i. The PWSF is collocated on an existina PWSF and is more than IS' above the exislina facility; or. ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri¡¡ht-of-way and is more than 15' above the structure; or. iii, The PWSF is located on an existinastructure in the BPA trail and is more than IS' above the existina structure; or. iv, The PWSF is located on an exi,lina ,tructure in an appropriate public ri¡¡ht-of-way and is more than IS' above the e,istina structure. plus any hei¡¡ht aranted under Chapter 22-96 7(b ), c, All other types and locations of PWSFs ere not allowed, J, ~i" .11.....11. 04.. aP'YEr, 4J, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF dëvelopment regulations, At a minimum, i'...r a five (5) foot Type III landscaping !œ! shall be required ~ facility, unless the community development services director detennines that the facility is adequately screened, '1, ~.. ~"'" ,J3 g'q.), tlelo, New free-standina PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shall be ~ allowed 2!!!l on existing towers. "'"' on publicly used structures not located in public ri¡¡hts-of.way. on exislina structures located in the BPA trail. and on existina structures in appropriate public riahts-of-way, Refer to Section 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs, November 30, 1999 Section 6. Section 22-700 ofthe Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-700. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the professional office (PO) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See note,) 4 for allowed types of PWSFs R E G U L A T I 0 N S Process ~m G>~ mrß k~~ ,~=- I O~, -n;~ ~ ORDINANCE NO, See note 2 MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT SIDE See note I See note I See note I , PAGE 8 REAR See note I ¡.,g:¡: ~m=n.o.= - - ~ ...~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST. read down to find use. , . TIIEN, across for REGULATIONS USE ZONE CHART MAXIMUM IiËiGHT Refer to Seëi1OO22- 967 for maximum hei~hts for allowed tvpes of ~ See note 2 LANDSCAPE SIGNS PARKING I ~~ I SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES See note 4~ &. ~ N/A I. Itilil .tII"'~I,\",il .n..ferll....ite" iII~e;, ..eer~..ee...tile_l~e,l;i.!...i,,!!f.r..eheftileli"e~ ~ Not applicable PWSFs allowed on existin~ structures onlv, 2, The review process used will be as follows' a,P~e...lIlifthep"'gr, e'ls",e.,.~.Ji)il!hi!!hllimil. ~,P,ee... III if the r"'sr i. ..lIe..."le... , i5lil! r"'sr er p.~liel) ..e~ .It.llure "l~ i.l... tit.. II' a~e e otee..illitcfaeilil)er.lt.ltt<.e, I, S.bject to meetin~ all applicable development standards, Process III for the followin~ proposals: i, The PWSF is collocated on an existin~ PWSF and is less than IS' above the existin~ facility; or. ii. The PWSF is located on a publiclv used structure not located in a public ri~ht-of-wav and i. less than 15' ebove the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is loclled on an ""istin~ structure in the BPA trail and is less than 15' above the existin~ structure; or. iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an approprilte public ri~ht-of.wav and is less than 15' ebove the exi.tin~ structure, plus anv hei¡¡ht wanted under Chapter 22-967(b) b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin~ proposals' i, The PWSF is collocated on an ""istin~ PWSF and i. more than 15' ebove the existin~ facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on a publiclv used structure not located in I public ri~ht-of-wav and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is localed on an existin~ structure in the BPA trail and is more than IS' ebove the existin~ structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public ri~ht-of-wav and is more than 15' above the ""istin~ structure, plus anv hei¡¡ht ~ranted under Chapter 22.967(b), c, All other types and locations ofPWSFs are not allowed, ], SiS'" are nelalle e~ e. a p"'sr, 43, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF d~elopmentregulations, At a minimum,fJ'.efa five Cs) foot Type IIllandscaping~shall berequired~ facility. unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened ~, gel Seelie. JJ n'Ce¡, lisle, New free-standin~ PWSF. are not allowed, PWSFs shall be eøIy allowed 2!ili: on existing towers, - on publicly used structures not located in public ri¡¡hts-of-wav, on existinR .tructures located in the BPA trail, and on ""istinR structures in appropriate public riRhts-of.wav, Refer to Section 22.967 for development standards applicable to allowed tvpes of PWSFs, Not allowed on a PWSF November 30, 1999 )grT G>~ m- a ~.~ 0 ~I Section 7. Section 22-730 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-730. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the neighborhood business (BN) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See note ~ 4 for allowed types of PWSFs R Ii: G U L A T I 0 N S Process See note 2 ORDINANCE NO. MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT SIDE See note I See note I See note I , PAGE 9 USE ZONE CHART L" v.Ù""o DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, , . THEN, across for REGULATIONS REAR ~ LANDSCAPE MAXIMUM HEIGHT "~CD.r~ See note I Refer to Section 22- 967 for maximum heiMhts for allowed types of ~ Not allowed on a PWSF -- See note 41 See note 2 SIGNS PARKING II Z:~E I SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES &eo ~ I. Iliaill", ""'~. aui. .'1 ferlb... ilalll ill he ill.... ~- 01.. ~! ..~..Ijil\j!....,i 'Afer_h .flb.li..a~ ~ Not IJplicable, PWSFI allowed on existina structures only, 2, The review process used will be as follows: a, Pr.._III if Ita r"'SF. .a" Ita .n~arlji'81"SI1lIil.il. h, P",._III iflba r"'Sf ia ull..atd ". II . illinA r"'sr or p"hlial, ...~ a. a"'" Iß~ ill- 11-01 II' Iha '.' Iba anialias roeHi., or a"a....., a, Subject to meetinM all applicable development standards, Process III for the followinM proposals: i. The PWSF is collocated on an exis¡¡nM PWSF and is less than 15' above the existinM facility; or. ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riMht-of.way Ißd is less than I j' above the structure; or. iii, The PWSF is located on an existinM structure in the BPA trail and is less than 15' above the existinM ,tructure; or. iv, The PWSF is located on an existina struCbJre in an appropriate public riaht-of-way and is less than I j' above the exis¡¡nM struCbJre. plus any heiaht wanted under Chapter 22-96 7(b ), b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II. Division 8 for the followinM proposals: i, The PWSF is collocated on an existinM PWSF and is more than 15' above the ""is¡¡nM facility; or, ii, The PWSF il located on a publicly used ,trucbJre not located in a public riMht-of-way and is more than I j' above the struCbJre; or. iii The PWSF is located on an existinM structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existina strucwre; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an ""istinM structure in an appropriate public riaht-of.way and i, more than I j' above the existinM structure. plus any heiaht aranted under Chapter 22-96 7(b ), c, All other types and locations of PWSFs are not allowed, ' J,SiIllIlOla"lIolIl a~11 aP"'Sr. 41, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum. ~ a five (5) foot Type III landscaping ~ shall be required !!!!!!!!!!.!!!= facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened ~, SII Suli. L 22 9H(.), Nell, New free-standinM PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shall be""'" allowed !!!!!x on existing towers, "'"' on publicly used structures not located in public riMhts-of.way, on ""is¡¡nM strucbJres located in the BPA trail, and on existinM strucwres in IJpropriate public riMhts-of-way, Refer to Section 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs, N/A November 30, 1999 Section 8. Section 22-762 ofthe Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-762. Personal wireless service facility. The folIowing uses shalI be pennitted in the community business (Be) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility See note 5 for allowed types of PWSFs m >< :I - a - - RI E G U L A T I 0 N S - - Process See note 2 ~ (j) m Þ 0 ~ ~RDlN ANCE NO, \~ ' MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT SIDE Me - .¡. See note I See note I ~ , PAGE 10 USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, ' , THEN, across for REGULATIONS lIiXltlUtIE REAR ¡,g:¡: MAXIMUM HEiGHT I ~ I LANDSCAPE SIGNS PARKING r~=n H'~ -- SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES See note I ~ Refer to S~2- 967 for maximum heiRhts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ ~ N/A I. ~ For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject property, For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new free-standinR PWSFs shall be 20' for front. side, and rear yards, 2, Subject to meetinR all applicable development standards. '!'¡he review process used ill ~a .. f.lI. a shall be Process I. except for the foliowinR proposals' a, Pr.....1 iflh pH'Er:. ..1I..al..I.. a a"isli.S p"'Er, ~,P..a..' III ü all na froa ,lei ~iftS pH'Er,. ""'~I" ft .~iHo~ i. "0," ~.I. a, Process III for the foliowinR proposals: i. The PWSF is located within 300 feet ofa residential zone; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the buildinR or sbUcture. plus any heiRht wanted under Chapter 22-967(b); or. ii, The PWSF is located on a sbUcwre that is a residence or school or contoins a residence or'school; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the sbUcture; or. iii, The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; except as IIItMIiIteoI provided in "c" below, b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatinR four or more providers c, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II. Division 8 for the foliowinR proposals: i, ThePWSF is collocated on an existinRPWSF and is more than IS' above the existinR facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on a publicly used sbUcture not located in a public riRJ>t-of.way and is more than 15' above the sbUcwre; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existinR sbUcwre; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existinR sbUcwre in an appropriate public riRJ>t-of-way and is more than 15' above the existinR sbUcwre, plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or. v, The PWSF is located on a buildinR or sbUcwre that is not a residence or school and does not contoin a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildinR orsbUcture, 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100'. plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more providers; except that a lattice tower of between 120' to 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers, 1. EiSft.... . .1 all. a~.. a P"'Ef. ~, All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum. ~a five (5) foot Type IIIlandscaping!œ! shall be required around the facility, unless the community development services director detennines that the facility is adequately screened, 5, New free-standinR PWSFs are allowed subject to heiRht limits and collocation provisions, PWSFs are allowed on existinR towers. on private buildinRS and sbUctures, on publicly used sbUctures not located in public riRJ>ts-of. way. on existinR sbUcwres located in the BPA trail, and on existinR sbUcwres in appropriate public riRhts-of-way, Refer to Section 22-967 for development standar<ls~aj)plicable to allowed types of PWSFs, Me ~ Not allowed on a PWSF See note 3 November 30, 1999 ;g~ G):t mijj ~~ ~~ I VI I ,..,¡ I Section 9. Section 22-802 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-802. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the city center core (CC-C) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility See note 5 ¡:;;;:--- allowed types of ~ R E G U L A T I 0 N S Process ORDINANCE NO. See note 2 MINIMUMs REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT SIDE REAR &. - .¡. See note I See note I ~ , PAGE II USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, . , TIŒN, across for REGULATIONS ~~,~~~ ,Q+ I ZONE I CC-C MAXIMUM iŒiãiiT PARKING LANDSCAPE SIGNS ~^U~b .~~ SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES See note I I.lfi.im'."8It~1ll."ia a"MfllI...ilO"" iIIh.i.a"".Iß.....th..,~..I,' g..nilgt:er_lI.f~..liOld ~ For developed sites. the setback requirements shall be those of the prineipal use of the subieet property For undeveloped sites. the setback requirements for new free-standinR PWSFs shall be 20' for fron~ side, end rear ~ 2, Sub¡eet to meetinR alllØplicable development standards, "'!he review proeess used ill h. II fell. , ~ Process I. except for the followinR proposa1s: a, Pr.....1 if lb. p"'~r ia ..II..als~ 51 a ,"iOli", P"'EF, h,P,......Illf.,all.. fr"""'~"'eF"'~r,." -,,'II"s~i¡:;.~i."a,"h.l. , a, Proc:ess III for the followinR proposa1s: i, The PWSF is loated within 300 feel of a residential zone; provided the PWSF is less then I S' above the buildinR or structure. plus eny heil!ht wanted under ChlØter 22-967(b); or. ii, The PWSF is loc:ated on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school; provided the PWSF is less than IS' above the structure: or. iii, The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs: except u"""¡¡¡;"¡ provided in "c," below, b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower aceommodatinR four or more provid..., e, Vlrience process PUBuant to FWCC Chapter 22. Aniclell, Division 8 for the followinR proposals: i, The PWSF is colloc:ated on en existinR PWSF end is more then I S' above the existinR facility; or, ii, The PWSF is loated on a publiely used strueture not loated in a public ril!ht-<>f-way end is more then 15' above the strueture; or. iii, The PWSF is loated on en existinR structure in the BPA trail end is more then 15' above the existinR strueture; or, iv, The PWSF is loated on en «istinR structure in en appropriate public riRht-<>f.way end is more then 15' above the «istinR structure. plus eny heil!ht wanted under Chapter 22-967(b); or. v, The PWSF is loeated on a buildinR or structure that is not a residence or scbool end does not contain a residence or sebool; provided the PWSF is more then I S' above the buildinR orstrueture, 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free.standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100', plus eny height grented under Chapter 22-1047. A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more provid...; except that a lattice tower of between 120' to I SO' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more provid..., 1, SigtS au ....lIt d.,. rWEr, ~, All PWSF sh.1I be lendscaped end saeened in aceordence with Article XVII end the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimurn.§J.efa five (5) foot Type I11lendscaping~ shall be required~ facility, unless the community development services direc:tor determines that the facility is adequately sereened, 5, New free-standinR PWSFs are allowed ,"b¡eet to heil!ht limits end colloabon provisions, PWSFs are allowed on existinR towers. on private buildinlll end structures, on publiely used structures notloated in public ril!hts-<>f-way, on existinR struetures loated in the BP A trail. end on «isbnR struetures in IØpropriate public rights-of-way, Refer to Seetion 22-967 for development standards applic:able to allowed types ofPWSFs, -.-,.¡. Refer to SëCiiõñ22. 967for maximum heil!hts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ ~ &. ....- N/A Not allowed on a PWSF See note 3 November 30, 1999 Section 10. Section 22-817 ofthe Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-817. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the city center frame (CC-F) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART USE R E G U L A T I 0 N S ce"ER . Œ MAXIMUM --¡:j£i(jITf LANDSCAPE SIGNS PARKING MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS ~¡g DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, ' , 11ŒN, across for REGULATIONS u ¡,g:¡: LOT SIZE Process REAR SIDE FRONT Personal wireless service facility See note 2 Me - + See note I See note I ~ Refer to S~2- 967 for maximum hei~hts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ ~ Me - See note I None Not allowed on a PWSF See note 5 for allowed ~ PWSFs See note 3 ~ G) m I~! 0\ T~~ ~;, ORDINANCE NO, , PAGE 12 I ZONE I CC-F SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES N/A I.lIio¡",- CI. II ~"II';"'."'. f~rlh.. 'tal!! ill h, il M",""aa ..111, ."~arl" "'..01 i08 fer !lah aflh I¡.u~ ~ For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject property, For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new free.standin~ PWSF. shall be 20' for fron~ side, and rear ~ 2. Subject to meetin~ all applicable development standards, +!he review process used . ill h. II raIls '!h!!lli Process I. except for the followin~ proposals: a Prea...! if 111 a p"'gr i. ..11....", '0 a. i!!illi!! p"'Er. h.Pa._IIIl<Irall" f",__~ill",p"'Er.,. "~I...a~i¡;a~'1 "a,"hda a. Process III for the followin~ proposals: i, ThePWSF is located within 300feetofa residential zone; provided thePWSF is less than 15' above the buildin~ or structure. plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, ii, The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school; provided the PWSF is less than IS' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; except as tIMIèifteè provided in "c" below, b, Process!V if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatinR four or more provide", c, Variance process pu"uant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin~ proposals: i. The PWSF is collocated on an existinR PWSF and is more than IS' above the existinR facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riJð¡t-of-way and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii. The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existin~ structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public riJð¡t-of-way and is more than 15' above the existinR structure. plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22.967(b); or, v. The PWSF is located on a buildinR or structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence orschool; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildin~ orstructure, 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the selVice up to 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more provide,,; except that a lattice tower of between 120' to 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more provide", I.Ei¡l"..aoatalla .~a"ap"'gr, j4. All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum,i'-e!'a five (5) foot Type IIllandscaping!œ! shall be required~ facility. unless the community development selVices director detennines that the facility is adequately screened, 5. New free.standinR PWSFs are allowed subject to heiJð¡t limits and collocation provisions. PWSFs are allowed on existinR towers. on private buildinJ!S and structures. on publicly used structures not located in public riJð¡ts-of-way. on existin~ .tructures located in the BPA trail. and on existinR structures in appropriate public riJð¡1s-of.way, Refer to Section 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types ofPWSFs, November 30, 1999 Section II. Section 22-835 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-835. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the office park (OP, OPI--4) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE R E G U L A T I 0 N S MAXIMUM ïŒiGHT USE ZONE CHART ~v~ ~.., DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down 10 find use. .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS u LOT SIZE b9+ Process FRONT SIDE LANDSCAPE REAR SIGNS PARKING ~.,..~ Personal wireless service facility See note 2 See - + See note I See note I See note I ~ Refer to S;;ct;;;;;"22- 967 for maximum heil!hts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ ~ See -.. Not allowed on a PWSF ~ See note 5 ¡:;;;:-- allowed types of PWSFs See note 3 i\ ,1 ~ G) m þ¡, C -r' 1.'","- ~I ~ ~: ORDINANCE NO. , PAGE 13 I WNE I OP, OPl--4 SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES N/A I.lli.i.,."",,~ R a"i...., I f.rth.. ill' I ill hi in II..r~aI 1118 1111 ...,~..I)i.8 "".i, .!IflI -" .fll1.li,,'" ~ For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the ,ubiect propeny, For undeveloped sites. the setback requirements for new free-standinR PWSFs shall be 20' for fron~ side, and rear ~ 2. Subiect to mcetinR all applicable development standards, "'!he review process used ill h. . f.lI. 1 shall be Process I, except for the followinR proposals. a, Pra.... I iflkl P"'EF il ..lIu"a~ a... '.~.8 p"'Er, h. P"'.llIIû all.. íu "" ~in..r"(Erl,. l.el.m.Ali'" in ".,"htll .. Process III for the followinR proposals: i, The PWSF is located within 300 feet of. residential zone; provided the PWSF i, less than IS' above the buildinR or structure, plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or. . ii, The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school;provrded the PWSF is less than IS' above the structure; nr, iii. The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs: except u tIIeèiIieoI provided in "c," below, b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatinR four or more provider>, c. Variance process puBuant to FWCC Chapter 22, AniclelI, Division 8 for the following proposals: i, The PWSF is collocated on an existinR PWSF and is more than I S' above the existing facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ril!ht-of-way and is more than IS' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in the BPA trail and is more than I S' above the existinR structure; or. iv, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in an appropriate public riRht-of.way and is more than IS' above the existinR structure, plus any heiRht wanted under Chapter 22-967(b): or, v. The PWSF is located on a buildinR or structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than IS' above the building orstructure, 3. Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more provider>; except that a lattice tower of between 120' to I SO' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more provider>, 1. Ei.. all n.. III. IÜI, a p"'Er, ~, All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Anicle XVII and the provisions of the PWSF dëvelopmentregulations, At a minimum. ¥-ef a five (S) foot Type IIIlandscaping!Œ! shall be required around the facility, unless the community development services director dotenoines that the facility is adequately screened. S, New free-standinR PWSFs are allowed subject to heiRht limits and collocation provisions, PWSFs are allowed on existing towers, on private buildinltS and structures. on publicly used structures not located in public ril!hts-of-wlY, on existinR structures located in the BPA trail. and on existinR structures in appropriate public rights-of.way, Refer to Section 22.967 for development standards applicable to allowed types ofPWSFs, November 30, 1999 -uml ):> X' (;)1: m ffil Þ, :, ( , ~~ Section 12. Section 22-871 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-871. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the business park (BP) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility See note 5 ¡:;;;:-- allowed types of PWSFs RI E G U L A T I 0 N S Process ORDINANCE NO. See note 2 LOT SIZE FRONT See - .¡. See note I None MiNJM\JM$ REQUIRED YARDS SIDE REAR See note I See note I , PAGE 14 w:¡: C8'<[~ 'f:E ~ Il' "QIIIJIIE DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down 10 find use", THEN, across for REGULATIONS USE ZONE CHART MAXIMUM HEiGHT Refer to SectiõñI2- 967 for maximum hei~hts for allowed types of ~ See note 3 LANDSCAPE See note ~ ~ SIGNS PARKING I ~ I SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES See ~ N/A 1. Iii il .n. Allallin....r.,tIi..aita",. iIIhaina"arAa..aletl"..Aarl)i !..nio8far...h.ftli,li"ad ~ For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the .ubject property For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new free-standin~ PWSFs shall be 20' for fron~ side, and rear ~ 2 Subject to moetin~ all applicable development standards, 'l'!he review process used .. ill ha as folIa , ~ Process I, except for the followin~ proposals: a, r..a...1 iflb, p"'&r i. ,alla.ateA'J a allisti.! r"'Ef h, Pr.....1II far all ft' free,... din! P"'gf>, a ,.a~I" adili.d in "'," hala a, Process III for the followin~ proposals: i, The PWSF is located within 300 foetofa residential rone; provided thePWSF is less than 15' above the buildin~ or structure, plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, ii, The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the structure; or, iii. The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; except as I'IItMIiIieè provided in "c," below, b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatin~ four or more providers c, Variance process pursuønt to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin~ proposals, i. The PWSF is collocated on øn existin~ PWSF and is more than 15' above the existin~ facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri~ht-of.way and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii. The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existin~ structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public ri~ht-of-way and is more than 15' above the existin~ structure. plus any hei~ht wanted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, v, The PWSF is located on a buildin~ or structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence orschool; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildin~ orstructure, 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free.standing PWSF .hall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more providers; except that a lattice tower of between 120' to 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers, 1. &i!oa an lat alia ,d an a P"'Ef, ~, All PWSF shall be landscaped ønd screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF dÕvelopment regulations, At a minimum, i'-ef a five (5) foot Type III landscaping !œ! shall be required ~ facility, unl... the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened 5, New free-standin~ PWSFs are allowed subject to hei~ht limits and collocation provisions, PWSF. are allowed on existin~ towers, on private buildin.u and .tructures, on publicly used structures not located in public ri¡¡hts-of-way, on existin~ structures located in the BPA trail, and on existin~ structures in appropriate public ri¡¡hts-of-way, Refer to Section 22-967 for developmenHtandards applicable to allowed types ofPWSFs, Not allowed on a PWSF November 30, 1999 ~m )S¿;( G)~ ~'= ÞH ~ ~,'- I] [ --1 J C'~ <=~! :~ f: Section 13. Section 22-906 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-906. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the corporate park (CP-l) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility See note 5 r;;;:-- allowed ~ PWSFs R E G U L A T I 0 N S - Process See note 2 ORDINANCE NO. USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. . . TIŒN. across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS "Üvnn~,o LOT SIZE I :;>;~ I b9+ MAXIMUM ~ FRONT SIDE LANDSCAPE REAR SIGNS PARKING ~~'=D'~~ SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES !iee - + I . ~ For developed sites, the setbaclc reQuirements shall be those of the ~ri;cipal ~ of the subiect propeny For undeveloped sites, the setback reQuirements for new free-standina PWSFs shall be 20' for fron~ side, and rear ~ 2, Subiect to meetina all applicable development standards, "'!he review process used ill ha .!,!lIa . ~ Process I. except for the followina proposals: a, Pr..... I ifll.. P"'Ef is a.II,'au~ ae a ",illi S P":EF, h, P..,... III far all ea frat sl8ft~il! P"'EM,' "rl. 1IL.~i¡¡.~ i. "a," halo a, Process III for the followina proposals: i. The PWSF is located within 300 feet ofa residential zone; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the buildina or structure, plus any heiaht JI1"anted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, ii. The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or con..ins a residence or school; provided the PWSF is I... than IS' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is a new free-standins PWSFs; except as "'""'"" provided in "c," below, b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice lOwer accommodatina four or more providers c, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Anicle II, Division 8 for the followina proposals, i. The PWSF i. collocated on an exisona PWSF and is more than 15' above the existina facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on s publicly used structure not located in a public riaht-{)f-way and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii. The PWSF is located on an existina structure in the BPA trail and i, more than 15' above the existina structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existina structure in an appropriate public riaht-{)f.way and is more than 15' above the existina structure, plus any heiaht aranted under Chapter 22.967(b); or, v, The PWSF is located on a buildina or structure that is not a residence or school and does oot con..in a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildina or structure. 3. Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22.1047. A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more provideR; except that a lattice tower of between 120' 10 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more provideR I.Eil!'l1....alalia a~a..P"'Ef. §:!. All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum,""" a five (5) foot Type III landscaping ~ shall be required ~ facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened, 5. New free-standina PWSFs are allowed subiect to heiaht limits and collocation provisions, PWSFs are allowed on existina toWeR, on private buildinas and structures, on publicly used structures not located in public riahts-{)f.way. on exisona structures located in the BPA trail. and on existina structures in appropriate.i>!lþlic rights-{)f.way Refer 10 Secoon 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types ofPWSFs, See note I See note I See note I ~ Refer to SëCiiõñ22- 967for maximum heiahts for allowed types of ~ See note § ~ - - N/A Not allowed on a PWSF ~ See note 3 , PAGE 15 November 30, 1999 Section 14. Section 22-966 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-966. Personal wireless service facilities (PWSF). (a) Purpose. This section addresses the issues oflocation and appearance associated with personal wireless service facilities. It provides adequate siting opportunities through a wide range of locations and options which minimize safety hazards and visual impacts sometimes associated with wireless communications technology. The siting of facilities on existing buildings or structures, collocation of several providers' facilities on a single support structure, and visual mitigation measures are required, unless otherwise allowed by the city, to maintain neighborhood appearance and reduce visual clutter in the city. (b) Definitions. Any words, terms or phrases used in this section which are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in section 22-1 of this Code. (c) Exemptions. The following antennas and facilities are exempt from the provisions of this section and shall be permitted in all zones consistent with applicable development standards as outlined in the Use Zone Charts. Article XL District Regulations: (1) (2) (3) (4) ORDINANCE NO. Wireless communication facilities used by federaL state. or local public agencies for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster. emergency preparedness. and public health or safetv purposes. Industrial processing equipment and scientific or medical equipment using frequencies regulated by the FCC; provided such equipment complies with all applicable provisions of Section 22-960. Rooftop Appurtenances. and Chapter 22. Article XIII. Division 5. Height. Citizen band radio antennas or antennas operated by federallv licensed amateur ("ham") radio operators; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of Section 22-960. Rooftop Appurtenances. and Chapter 22. Article XIII. Division 5. Height. Satellite dish antennas less than two meters in diameter. including direct-to-home satellite services. when used as a secondarv use of the propertv; provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of Section 22-960. Rooftop Appurtenances. and Chapter 22. Article XIII. Division 5. Height. (5) Automated meter reading (AMR) facilities for the purpose of collecting utility meter data for use in the sale of utility services. except for whip or other antennas greater than two (2) feet in length; provided the AMR facilities are within the scope of activities permitted under a valid franchise agreement between the utility service provider and the city. ,PAGE 16 EX H ~ B r 7_}aEU~' 2000 PAGEJLOf- ~J- (6) Routine maintenance or repair of a wireless communication facility and related equipment excluding structural work or changes in height. dimensions. or visual impacts of the antenna. tower. or buildings: provided that compliance with the standards of this chapter are maintained. (ej@ Prioritized locations. The following sites shall be the required order of locations for proposed PWSFs, including antenna and equipment shelters, l:lHless the eity eleets to æødify the priøritiæ.tiøH. In requestiHg proposing a PWSF in a particular location, the applicant shall analvze the feasibilitv of locating the proposed PWSF in each of the higher prioritv locations and document, to the city's satisfaction, why a locatieaing the PWSF in each higher priority location and/or zone is not being proposed. In order of preference, based on aÐ. assessæeflt of feasibility the sites prioritized locations for PWSFs are as follows: (3) (4) ORDINANCE NO. (1) Structures located in the BP A trail: A PWSF mav be located QQn any existing support structure currently located in the easement upon which are located U.S. Department of Energy/Bonneville Power Administration ("BP A") Power Lines regardless of underlving zoning. (2) Existing broadcast, relay and transmission towers: A PWSF may be located GQn any existing site or tower where a legal wireless telecommunication facility is currently located regardless of underlying zoning. If an existing site or tower is located within a one mile radius of a proposed PWSF location. the applicant shall document whv collocation on the existing site or tower is not being proposed. regardless of whether the existing site or tower is located within the jurisdiction of the citv. Publicly-used structures: If the city consents to such location, attaehed to a PWSF may be located on existing public facilities within all zoning districts. such as water towers, utility structures, fire stations, bridges, and other public buildings within all zoning distriets. provided the public facilities are not located within public rights-of-way. Appropriate Bbusiness, commercial.. and city center zoned sites: 8truetl:lres or sites l:lsed for researeh and develøJ3meHt, eømmereial and offiee l:lses. A PWSF may be located on private buildings or structures within appropriate business. commercial. and city center zoning districts. The preferred order of zoning districts for this category of sites is as follows: BP--Business Park CP-I--Corporate Park OP through OP-4--0ffice Park ,PAGE 17 EX H U3 J7~uJt 2000 PAGE /ìuF ~:z:.. CC-C--City Center Core CC-F--City Center Frame BC--Community Business (5) Appropriate public rights-of-wav: For the purposes of this section. appropriate public rights-of-way shall be defined as including those public rights-of-wav with functional street classifications of principal arterial. minor arterial. and principal collector. A PWSF may be located on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-wav. Structures proposed for location ofPWSFs shall be separated bv at least 330 linear feet. Within any residential zone. Neig~ Business (BN) zone. or Professional Office (PO) zone. +there shall be no more than one PWSF located on an existing structure. Existing structures in appropriate public rights- of-way shall not be eligible for submittal of a use process application for placement of a PWSF for one vear from the date of the completion of construction or alteration. Location of a PWSF on an existing structure in an appropriate public right-of-way shall require a right-of-way permit in addition to the required use process approval. The preferred order of functional street classifications for this category of sites is as follows: Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Principal Collector Ifthe PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and the surrounding uses or zoning are not the same. that portion of the right-of-way with the most intensive use and/or zoning shall be the preferred location. If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and surrounding uses or zoning are the same. the preferred location shall be that portion of the right-of-way with the least adverse visual impacts. ~ Ifthe applicant demonstrates to the city's satisfaction that it is not technically possible to site in a prioritized location, the city reserves the right to approve alternative site locations if a denial would be in violation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, as determined by the city. ORDINANCE NO. ,PAGEl8 EXHIB~i- (J P AGE I t'n~ 1=°o~ J- -- Sec. 22-967. Development Standards (d ) DeveJepmel'lt s~l'ldards. The following development standards shall be followed in the design, siting, and construction of a personal wireless service facility. fB PWSFs shall be ser-eeaeà or eamøHflaged tflrøHgh emt>loyiag the best availaBle teelmølogy aaà desiga, as determiRed by the eity. This may be aeeomplisheà by Hse øf eo¡.:apatible materials, loeatioa, eDler, stealth teelmi<iHes SHea as, 13m Rot limiteà to artifieial trees and hallow flag pales, and/or oÜier taeties to aehie','e minim1:UR visibility of the faeility as ','ieweà from pHBlie streets or resiàeatial prof)erties. ~a) Buildiní! or structure mounted PWSFs not located in the public right ofwav. PWSFs may be mounted on aonresiàeBtial existing buildings and structures not located in a public right-of-wav shall conform to the following development standards under the following eøaditioRs: (1) The PWSF shall consist only of the following types of facilities: a. The PWSF eoRsists of a A microcell or a minor facility: or. b. A PWSF that exceeds the minor facility thresholds for number of antennas. dimensions. and/or area. but creates no more adverse impacts than a minor facility. as determined bv the director of community development services. subject to meeting all of the following standards: 1. The facility shall not create substantially more adverse visual impact than a minor facility: and. 11. The equipment cabinet for the PWSF shall meet all requirements ofFWCC 22-967(e): and. 111. The maximum size of the PWSF panels and number of antennas shall be determined by the director of community development services. based on the specific project location. surrounding environment. and potential visual impacts: and. The PWSF shall complv with all other applicable standards of the FWCC. IV. Ð-. ill The combined antennas and supporting structure shall Rot mav extend more than up to. but not exceed. 15 feet above the existing or proposed roof or other structure regardless of whether the existing structure is in conformance with the existing maximum height of the underlying zone as outlined in the Use Zone ,PAGE 19 EXHIB~1 ~ PAGE /9 01!' ~~- ORDINANCE NO. Charts. Article XL District Regulations. Antennas may be mounted to rooftop appurtenances provided they do not extend beyond 15 feet above the roof proper. e-. ill The antennas are mounted on the building or structure such that they are located and designed to minimize visual and aesthetic impacts to surrounding land uses and structures and shall, to the greatest extent practical, blend into the existing environment pursuant to Section 967(d). Panel and parabolic antennas shall be eompletely screened from residential views and public rights-of-way unless meeting the provision of section 22-960(b )(2). (b) PWSFs located on structures within appropriate public rif!hts-of-wav. These facilities shall conform to the following development standards: ill The PWSF shall consist onlv of the following types of facilities: a. The PV/8F consists of a A microcell or a minor facility: or. b. A PWSF that exceeds the minor facilitv thresholds for number of antennas. dimensions. and/or area. but creates no more adverse impacts than a minor facility. as determined bv the director of communitv development services. sublect to meeting all of the following standards: 1. The facility shall not create substantiallv more adverse visual impact than a minor facility: and. 11. The equipment cabinet for the PWSF shall meet all requirements of FWCC 22-967(e) and FWCC 22-967(0: and. 111. The maximum size of the PWSF panels and number of antennas shall be determined by the director of communitv development services. based on the specific prolect location. surrounding environment. and potential visual impacts: and. IV. The PWSF shall comply with all other applicable standards of the FWCC. (2) The combined antennas may extend UP to. but not exceed. 15 feet above the existing structure. This distance mav be increased by the minimum necessary additional height to meet the safety clearances required by the operator of the existing structure. The antenna extension may be permitted regardless of whether the existing structure is in conformance with the maximum height of the underlying zone as outlined in the Use Zone Charts. Article XL District Regulations. ORDINANCE NO, , PAGE 20 PE X H I B ; IdAfi,2QQQ - ~GE ~ OF 3~ (3) (4) (5) The antennas shIDLbe mounted on the structure such that thev are located and designed to minimize adverse visual and aesthetic impacts to surrounding land uses and structures and shall. to the greatest extent practical. blend into the existing environment pursuant to Section 967(d). Structures in appropriate pu~hts-of-way proposed...furJocation ofPWSFs shall be separated by at least 330 linear feet. Required setbacks shall not pertain to PWSFs within public rights ofwav~ or equipment enclosures located underground on properties adjacent to the publk right ofwav. Within residential zones. equipment enclosures located above ground on properties adjacent to the public right of way shall meet all applicable setback requirements for residential development ofthe underlving zone. For developed sites in non-residential zones. the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be those of the principal use of the subject propertv. For undeveloped sites in non-residential zones. the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be 20 feet for front. side. and rear vards. ~Í£.Ì New free staRdiBg PW8Fs New free-standinfl PWSFs. These structures shall conform to the following site development standards: a{l} Placement of a freestanding PWSF shall be denied if placement of the antennas on an existing structure can meet the applicant's technical and network location requirements. ~ Monopoles shall be the only free-standing structures allowed in the city; except that a lattice tower may be used to accommodate the collocation of four or more providers as part of a joint permit application. ill e1i) In no case shall a free-standing PWSFs be located closer than 500 feet to an existing free-standing PWSF whether it is owned or utilized bv the applicant or another provider. A free-standing PWSF, including the support structure and associated electronic equipment, shall comply with all required setbacks of the zoning district in which it is located. For developed sites. the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject property. For undeveloped sites. the setback requirements for new free-standing PWSFs shall be 20 feet for front. side. and rear vards. 4:ill Free-standing PWSFs shall be designed and placed on the site in a manner that takes maximum advantage of existing trees, mature vegetation, and structures so as to: ORDINANCE NO. , PAGE2) EXHIB~T-A P A G E~nQf 2U~~ e@ f{Z} (d) -ha. Use existing site features to screen as much of the total PWSF as possible from prevalent views; and/or ;?;.h. Use existing site features as a background so that the total PWSF blends into the background with increased sight distances. In reviewing the proposed placement of a facility on the site and any associated landscaping the city may condition the application to supplement existing trees and mature vegetation to more effectively screen the facility. Support structures, antennas, and any associated hardware shall be painted a nonreflective color or color scheme appropriate to the background against which the PWSF would be viewed from a majority of points within its viewshed. The Pproposed color or color scheme te shall be approved by the hearing examiner or community development director as appropriate tø the f)foeess. Screeninf! standards for all PWSFs. PWSFs shall be screened or camouflaged through emploving the best available technology and design. as determined by the city. This mav be accomplished by use of compatible materials. location. landscaping. color. stealth techniques such as. but not limited to. artificial trees and hollow flag poles. and/or other methods or techniques to achieve minimum YiIDillity of the facility as viewed from public streets or residential properties. In addition. the provisions for landscaping as outlined in the Use Zone Charts, Article XL District Regulations, shall apply. ~ Standards for electronics equipment enclosures. a{U ORDINANCE NO. Eqaif)meHt eflelosl:1fes shall be f)looeà 1:lßdergrøunà if f)raetieable. The following shall be the required order of locations for proposed electronic equipment enclosures for all PWSFs. In proposing an equipment enclosure in a particular location. the applicant shall analvze the feasibilitv of locating the proposed equipment enclosure in each of the higher prioritv locations and document. to the city's satisfaction. why a locating the equipment enclosure in each higher priority location is not being proposed. In requesting a lower priority location for the equipment enclosure. the burden of demonstrating impracticabilitv shall be on the applicant. In order of preference. the prioritized locations for equipment enclosures are as follows: (a) Equipment enclosures shall be placed underground. (b) Equipment enclosures shall be placed in an existing completely enclosed building. (c) Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground in an enclosed cabinet , PAGE 22 EXHIB~u I}- P AGE ~tJP' 4, 2°3 d-- &:ill (3) (4) that shall not exceed six feet in height and OCCUpy more than 48 SQuare feet of floor area. including areas for maintenance or future expansion. (d) Equipment enclosures shall be placeq above ground in a new completely enclosed building. If above ground, sereeBiBg øf PWSF equipment enclosures shall be proviàeà screened with one or a combination of the following materials methods, which sereeniBg shall be acceptable to the city: fencing, walls, landscaping, structures, buildings or topography which will block the view of the equipment enclosure as müen as to the greatest extent possible from any street and/or adjacent properties~ as determined bv the director of community development services. Screening may be located anywhere between the enclosure and the above mentioned viewpoints. Landscaping for the purposes of screening shall be maintained in a healthy condition, as determined by the city. ~J(S9"t Î9r 9QwipIR9Rt iRsl88Yfi8 iR 9~lis ril!àt8 8f \':&','8. 9Rsl88YfiB BRall 89 18satià 8Y¡siài 8f F9Qwintà 89t8ask afiaB. EQuipment enclosures located underground shall be exempt from setback reQuirements of the underlying zone. In residential zones. equipment enclosures located above ground shall meet all applicable setback reQuirements for residential development of the underlving zone. For developed sites in non-residential zones. the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be those of the principal use of the subject property. For undeveloped sites in non-residential zones. the setback requirements for the equipment enclosure shall be 20 feet for front. side. and rear vards. If the equipment caþinet is 10cated..JYi!þin a new completely enclosed building. the building shall conform to all applicable development standards and design guidelines for the underlying zone. The completely enclosed building shall be architecturally designed and shall be compatible with existing buildings on the site. The completely enclosed building shall be screened to the greatest extent possible from any street and/or adjacent properties by landscaping and/or topographv. (D Additional standards for equipment enclosures for PWSFs located on structures within approoriate lJUblic rif!hts-of-wav: (1) ORDINANCE NO. The following shall be the reQuired order of locations for proposed electronic equipment enclosures for PWSF located within public rights-of-wav. In proposing an equipment enclosure in a particular location. the applicant shall analyze the feasibility of locating the proposed equipment enclosures in each of the higher priority locations and document. to the city's satisfaction. why a locating the eQuipment enclosure in each higher prioritv location is not being proposed. In reQuesting a lower priority location for the equipment enclosure. the burden of , PAGE 23 EXHIBI~alluwy ~666 PAGE '-3 OF ~::1- ORDINANCE NO. demonstrating impracticability shall be on the applicant. In order of preference. the prioritized locations for eQuipment enclosures are as follows: (a) Electronic eQuipment enclosures shall not allowed within the right-of-wav in residJmtiill zones. ~borhood Business (BN) zones or Professional Office (PO) zones. fa.t-(b) Equipment enclosures shall be placed underground on an adjacent - property outside of the public right-of-way. AA (c) EQuipment enclosures shall be placed above ground on an adjacent - property outside of the public right-of-way in an existing completely enclosed building. fat (d) Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground on an adjacent - property outside of the public right-of-way in an enclosed cabinet that shall not exceed six feet in height and OCCUpy more than 48 SQuare feet of floor area. including areas for maintenance or future expansion. AA (e) EQuipment enclosures shall be placed above ground on an adjacent - property outside of the public right-of-wav in a new completelv enclosed building. ~ æ Equipment enclosures shall be placed underground within the public right- of-way. fA ~ Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground within the public right-of-wav in an enclosed cabinet that shall not exceed six feet in height and OCCUPy more than 24 square feet of floor area. including areas for maintenance or future expansion. (2) Equipment enclosures located underground on properties adjacent to the public right of way shall be exempt from setback reQuirements of the underlying zone. (3) In residential zones. equipment enclosures located above ground on properties adjacent to the public right of wav shall meet all applicable setback requirements for residential development ofthe underlying zone. For developed sites in non- residential zones. the setback requirements for the eQuipment enclosure shall be those of the principal use ofthe subject property. For undeveloped sites in non- residential zones. the setback requirements for the eQuipment enclosure shall be 20 feet for front. side. and rear yards. , PAGE 24 D r"'-' 11 E}{HlgJ ,:_~~. ---..." P AGE ;;l( JUf4, 20~ (4) (5) (6) Equipment enc~osures s~esigned.Jocated~ screeneq to minimize adverse visual impacts from the public right-of-wav and adjacent properties. Equipment enc~osures s~be designed. located. and screened to minimize adverse visual and functional impacts on the pedestrian environment. Equipment enc~osures and screening shall not adverselv impact vehicular sight distance. e-. Nø wireless eEI1:lÎpmeftt r-evieweà ooder this seetioB shall be løeateà '.vithin reql:lireà bl:lildiBg setbaek areas. ~g) Security Fencing. See1:lfÎty feBeiBg, ifl:lseà, shall eonførm to the followiBg: ~ èŒ e-.ill No fence shall exceed six feet in height as stipulated in section 22-1133(5). Security fencing shall be effectively screened from view through the use of appropriate landscaping materials. Chain-link fences shall be painted or coated with a nonreflective color. ~ Cumulative Effects. The city shall consider the cumulative visual effects of PWSFs mounted on existing structures and/or located on a given permitted site in determining whether the additional permits eaft may be granted so as to not adversely effect the visual character of the city. f7jffi Siflnage. No wireless equipment shall be used for the purpose of mounting signs or message displays of any kind, except for - signs used for identification and name of provider. f%) (1) (2) ORDINANCE NO. Use zone charts, height and permit process. The final approval authority for applications made under this section shall be defined by the appropriate permit process as outlined in the Use Zone Charts, Article XI, District Regulations. Allowed heights shall be established relative to appropriate process as outlined in the Use Zone Charts, Article XI, District Regulations. , PAGE 25 E, ;f, "-Qn~ ,lC='" n ¡. .,:1 ~D"J)L. ., ---_.J<1_-------- - PAGE~200~,- Sec. 22-968. Nonconformance. Permit applications made under this section to locate a PWSF on property on which a nonconformance is located shall be exempt from the requirements of Chapter 22. Article IV. Nonconformance. to bring the property into conformance as follows: (a) To provide the public improvements required bv Chapter 22. Article XVI. Improvements. as stipulated in Section 22-336. (b) To bring the propertv into conformance with the development regulations prescribedJn..Çhapter 21 relating to water quality as stipulated in Section 22-337(a)(7). All other requirements of Section 22-337 to bring the property into conformance with the development regulations prescribed in Chapter 21 relating to water quality shall apply. Section 22-969. Temporary Personal Wireless Service Facilities. As determined by the director of community development services. a temporary personal wireless service facilitv. or cell-on- wheels. may be deployed and operated as follows: (a) For a period of90 days during the construction of a free-standing PWSF which has been approved through the appropriate permit process; provided that the temporary personal wireless service facility or cell-on-wheels creates no more adverse impacts than the PWSF which was approved through the appropriate permit process. Onlv one temporary personal wireless service facility or cell-on- wheels shall be permitted for a single site. (b) For a period of30 days during an emergencv declared by the city. state. or federal government that has caused a free-standing PWSF which has been approved through the appropriate permit process to become involuntarily non-operational; provided that the temporary personal wireless service facilitv or cell-on-wheels creates no more adverse impacts than the PWSF which was approved through the appropriate permit process. (c) Prior to installation of the temporary PWSF. the applicant shall provide the city with a casþ bond in an amount to be determined by the director of community development services in order to guarantee performance of future removal and restoration of the site. Section 22-970. Application Requirements. (g) ApplÜ:atien requirements. (a) Except for Temporary Personal Wireless Facilities. Pl2ermit applications made under this section shall include the following minimum information in addition to that required for the underlying permit review process: (1) A diagram or map showing the primary viewshed ofthe proposed facility. ORDINANCE NO. , PAGE 26 E}{HIB~1r~~ P A G E~O FoOO 3 ~ (5) (6) (7) (8) (2) Photosimulations of the proposed facility from effected properties and public rights-of-way at varying distances. (3) Architectural elevations of proposed facility and site. (4) A coverage chart of the proposed PWSF at the requested height and an explanation of the need for that facility at that height and in that location. The explanation shall include an analysis of altematÍ'le sites and ,-,¡fly the FeE¡\:lested site is preferred O'ler other possiBle IDeations the feasibility of locating the proposed PWSF in each of the higher Priority locations as identified in Section 22-966( d). and documentation of whv locating the PWSF in each higher priority location and/or zone is not being proposed. An inventory of other PWSF sites operated by the applicant or other providers that are either iB the eity or within ~one mile of its boràers radius of the proposed PWSF location, including specific information about location, height, and design of each facility. A site/landscaping plan showing the specific placement of the PWSF on the site; showing the location of existing structures, trees, and other significant site features; and indicating type and locations of plant materials used to screen PWSF components. If the PWSF electronic eQuipment cabinet is proposed to be located above ground. regardless of the proposed location. whether on private or public property or within public right of way. an explanation ofwhv it is impracticable to locate the cabinet undergrouund. If the eQuipment cabinet is proposed to be locateq in a pu1ili£..rigþt-of-way. an explanation of whv it is impracticable to locate the eQuipment cabinet on adjacent property outside the public right-of-way. If the PWSF is located on an existing structure in an appropriate public right of way. a COpy of all applicable easements for placement and maintenance of the eQuipment enclosure on an adjacent propertv outside of the public right ofwav. f7jí.2} Documentation of efforts to collocate on existing facilities. OOQ..Q) Other information as deemed necessary by the community development director. (b) Permit applications for Temporary Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall include the following minimum information: (1) ORDINANCE NO. Documentation of previous Iv permitted facility. , PAGE 27 EXHIB~~~ ..B.__- P AGE )-1 J~~,4, 20~d- (2) Site plan showing proposed location of temporary facility in relationship to the location of the previously vermitted facility and property boundaries. including dimensions from the propertv lines and height of proposed facility. (3) Photographs of the proposed facility. Section 22-971. Collocation. (h)CelJeeatien. ~ A permittee shall cooperate with other PWSF providers in collocating additional antenna on support structures and/or on existing buildings and sites provided said proposed collocatees have received a permit for such use at said site from the city. A permittee shall allow other providers to collocate and share the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level impairment of the permitted use (as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee has exercised good faith in accommodating a new applicant, the city may require a third party technical study at the expense of the permittee. Failure to comply with this provision may result in a revocation of the permit. ~ A signed statement indicating that the applicant agrees to alloW for the potential collocation of additional PWSF equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same site location shall be submitted by the applicant as part of the permit application. If an applicant contends that future collocation is not possible on their site, they must submit a technical study documenting why. (c) Collocation requirements shall not apply to PWSFs located on existing structures in apt'ropriate pub~-wav witbin resid~ zones. Neighborhood Business (BN) zones and Professional Office (PO) zones Section 22-972. EMF Standards and Interference. (i) EHF stBndards and in1erfèrenee. fBW The applicant shall comply with federal standards for EMF emissions. Within six months after the issuance of its operational permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency (EMF) power densities of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report shall quantify the EMF emissions~ aOO compare the results with established federal standards. and provide a statement that the EMF emissions are within established federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the city for consistency with the project proposal report and the adopted federal standards. If on review, the city finds that the PWSF does not meet federal standards, the ORDINANCE NO. , PAGE 28 EXHH3w1~'~ P AGE ..aLC1=" 2U~ city may revoke or modify the permit. The applicant shall be given a reasonable time based on the nature of the problem to comply with the federal standards. If the permit is revoked, then the facility shall be removed. ~ The applicant shall ensure that the PWSF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts or the functioning of other electronic devices. If on review of a registered complaint the city finds that the PWSF interferes with such reception, the city may revoke or modify the permit. The applicant shall be given a reasonable time based on the nature of the problem to correct the interference. If the permit is revoked, then the facility shall be removed. Section 22-973. Removal of Facility. ffi Facility Fe1'l'le';l:1l. fBW Abandonment and removal. The owner or operator of a PWSF shall provide the citv with a copv of the notice of intent to cease operations required by the FCC at the time it is submitted to the FCC. Additionally. +!he owner or operator of a PWSF shall notify the city in writing ~ of the diseoatiaued use abandonment of a particular facility within 30 davs of the date the PWSF is abandoned. The abandoned PWSF shall be removed by the facility owner within 90 days of the date the site's l:lse is diseoatiaaed PWSF is abandoned, it eeases to be o~efatioflal, the permit is revoked, or if the facility falls into disrepair and is not maintained, as determined by the city. Disrepair includes structural features, paint, landscaping, or general lack of maintenance which could result in adverse safety or visual impacts. If there are two or more users of a single tower. then the citv' s right to remove the tower shall not become effective until all users abandon the tower. (b) Partial abandonment and removal. If the abandoned antennas on any PWSF are removed or relocated to a point where the top 20 percent or more of the height of the supporting structure is no longer in use. the PWSF shall be considered partially abandoned. The owner or operator of any partiallv abandoned PSWF shall notify the citv in writing of the partial abandonment of a particular facility within 30 days of the date the PWSF is partiallv abandoned. The owner of the PWSF shall have 120 days from the date of partial abandonment to collocate another service on the PWSF. If another service provider is not added to the PWSF within the allowed 120 day collocation period. the owner shall in 210 days of partial abandonment. dismantle and remove that portion of the supporting structure which exceeds the point at which the highest operational antenna is mounted. ~( c) Removal and lien. If the provider fails to remove the abandoned or partially abandoned facility upon 9() 210 days of its diseoatiaaed l:lse abandonment or partial abandonment, the responsibility for removal falls upon the property owner on which the abandoned or partiallv abandoned facility has been is located. If the property O\'Æer fails to remove the faeility withia 30 days of aotifieatioa by the eity, the øity or its agea! may eater liJ3on the sl:lbjeøt property and øause the faøility to be removed at the property owner's expease. The , PAGE 29 EXHIBI!~- PAGEA~OF~ ORDINANCE NO. city sftall tJ:ieft seftà to the 13ro13erty owner a verifieà statement of tae cost of e}{13eftses. Tae 13re13erty OWfier shall be liable fer the paymem of such costs aaà e2{peftSes. 1ft the eveftt the pro13erty ovifler fails to pay the costs and expeftses, the eity may file a lieft against the 13re13erty o\vner's real13ro13erty iR the amO\:mt of sMeh costs anà ex13enses and recorà sMca HeR with the King Ce\iflty Reeoràs Office. The city may enforce this paragraph using the procedures as set forth in FWCC. Article 3. Section 1-14. Section 22-974. Permit Limitations. ~ Permit limitations. tBW A permit for a PWSF shall expire ten years after the effective date of the permit approval, unless earlier revoked by the city. A permittee wishing to continue the use of a specific PWSF at the end of the ten-year period must apply for an application to continue that use at least six months prior to its expiration. The renewal application shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations dictating new permit issuance. In ruling on said renewal the city shall consider all then existing regulations effecting the application that are appropriate to the technology and use. ~).Q;ù Five years after the date of tae city's appro':al effective date of the land use process aDvroval of a PWSF ~ the permittee or assignee shall submit a written statement summarizing its current use and plans, if any, for that facility/site for the next five years to the best of their knowledge. ~ Consistent with the provisions of Section 22-408. AWl approved permit for a PWSF shall be valid for one year from the date of the city's approval effective date ofthe use process approval, with opportunity for a one-year extension. If not Msed a building Dermit application is not received within one year of the effective date of the use Drocess aDvroval, or within the extension period, the peFfRit use Drocess approval shall become null and void. Section 22-975. Revocation of Permit. æ Revectltie1'l ef permit. A permit issued under this article may be revoked, suspended or denied for anyone or more ofthe following reasons: tBW Failure to comply with any federal, state or local laws or regulations; ~b) Failure to comply with any ofthe terms and conditions imposed by the city on the issuance of a permit; ~ When the permit was procured by fraud, false representation, or omission of material facts; ORDINANCE NO. , PAGE 30 EXHIBIT A PAGE J~O<F 3;J- ~ Failure to cooperate with other PWSF providers in collocation efforts as required by this article; ~ Failure to comply with federal standards for EMF emissions; and féill) Failure to remedy localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts or the functioning of other electronic devices. f7jíg} Pursuant to Section 22-7(c). the city. as the applicant. shall use the same process to determine if the permit shall be revoked as it used to grant the permit. Section 15. Section 22-1473 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-1473. When public improvements must be installed. (a) The applicant shall provide the improvements required by this article if the applicant engages in any activity which requires a development permit, except for the following: (1) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this article if the proposed improvements in any 12-month period do not exceed 25 percent of the assessed or appraised value (based on an MAl appraisal provided by the applicant) of all structures on the subject property, whichever is greater. (2) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this article if, within the immediately preceding four years, public improvements were installed as part of any subdivision or discretionary land use approval under this or any prior zoning code. (3) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this article ifthe proposal is to locate a Personal Wireless Services Facility (PWSF) on the subject property. (b) Right-of-way adjacent to and within subdivision and short subdivisions must be dedicated and improved consistent with the requirements of this article, unless different requirements are imposed by the city as part of the subdivision or short subdivision approval. Section 16. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity or unconstitutionality of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or , PAGE 31 EXHIBIT Pr p ^ ~ E 3>1 Ja6F:°oo~;L ORDINANCE NO. circumstance, shall not effect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 17. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. . PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1999. APPROVED: RON GINTZ, MA YOR ATTEST: N. CRISTINE GREEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: LONDI K. LINDELL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: K:\cd\pwsfdoc ORDINANCE NO. , PAGE 32 EXHIBIT A P AGE 3~m8pOOO 3J. DRAFT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ORDINANCE NO. 99 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SITING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCESSES FOR PERSONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES WHEREAS, Section 704 of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 preserves local zoning authority over decisions regarding the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities, provided that regulation not discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services nor prohibit, or have the effect of prohibiting, the provision of personal wireless services; and, WHEREAS, the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and RCW 80.36.375 restricts and partially preempts a city's authority to regulate personal wireless service facilities; and, WHEREAS, personal wireless services facilities comprise a rapidly growing segment of the utilities and communications sector and have merit and value for the community and region as a whole; and, WHEREAS, personal wireless services facilities are supportive of the public health, safety, and welfare in that they provide useful portable communication services for personal convenience, business, and emergency purposes; and, WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way is concerned that future decisions regulating the siting and development of personal wireless services facilities, without appropriate standards and review processes, may adversely effect the public health, safety, and welfare of residents of the City of Federal Way; and, WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way reviewed potential impacts from the Personal Wireless Services Facilities Code Amendment Ordinance in compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act; and, WHEREAS, the Personal Wireless Services Facilities Code Amendment Ordinance will implement and is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and, DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the draft Personal Wireless Services Facilities Code Amendment Ordinance and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and, EXH~["--~ ,PAGE I PAG E I 13 AuglIst 18, 1999 ~"'~ DRAFT WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Personal Wireless Services Facilities Code Amendment Ordinance is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and RCW 80.36.375. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, IN REGULAR SESSION, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Federal Way City Code to satisfy the following basic needs: A. B. To provide appropriate standards and review processes for decisions regulating the siting and development of personal wireless services facilities; and, To be consistent with and implement the Federal Communications Act of 1996 and RCW 80.36.375. Section 2. Section 22-1 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to incorporate the following definitions in alphabetical order: Abandoned personal wireless service facility shall mean a PWSF that meets the following: (1) (2) Operation has voluntarily ceased for a period of 60 or more consecutive days: or, The effective radiated power of an antenna has been reduced by 75 percent for a period of 60 or more consecutive days: or, (3) The antenna has been relocated at a point less than 80 percent of the height of the support structure: or, (4) The number of transmissions from an antenna has been reduced by 75 percent for a period of 60 or more consecutive days. Cell-on-Wheels (C-O-W) shall mean a mobile temporary personal wireless service facility. Temporarv Personal Wireless Service Facility shall mean a personal wireless service facility which is to be placed in use for a limited period of time, is not deployed in a permanent manner, and does not have a permanent foundation. , PAGE 2 EXH!B~~~~ B PAG E 2 '-" 29 Àügüst 18, 1999 DRAFT ORDINA NCE NO. 99- ~ G) fï?ï" ! ~ " ~ Iw f I :';:~! ~ I~I Section 3. DRAFT Section 22-614 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-614. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the suburban estate (SE) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE JJ Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See note ~ 4 for allowed types of ~ i ! ' R E G [I L A T I 0 N S Process USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use . . . THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS ~Hm...uo - - See nole 2 LOT SIZE I ~E I ¡,g:¡; I MAXIMUM CQ"t;A . €;t; HEIGHT FRONT SIDE LANDSCAPE REAR SIGNS PARKING SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES See note t Refer to Sect;;;;;22. 967 for maximum heiRhts for allowed types of ~ Not allÕ;Õd on a PWSF See note I N/A I, llioi"." '1114 "'" i ,.",.ro.lI-..a;..". 'llhai,,"aao,4..,. "'~a ,4arl¡in..lIOfti'8fer..ahafltlali..a4 ~, Nol applicable, PWSF. allowed on exislinR structu.es only 2, The review process used will be as follow. I,P..a...l1lif"'aP"'Er"s ..II-a "Asl¡ie¡lh '8~lli,,;t. h. P..a- 111 if II- a p"'gr i. "lIaaald a".. a"i"i 8 p",sr ~.hlial, .seA "'_al..... A i. I... "'an I I' aha a I~ a a"i..i, e r.ailil! at "rua....., a, Subject to meetinR all applicable development standards, Process 111 for the followinR proposals' i, The PWSF is collocated on an exislinR PWSF and is less than 15' above the existinR facility; or. ii. The PWSF i. located on a publicly used .tructure not located in a public riRht-of-way and is less than 15' above the structure; or. iii, The PWSF i.located on an existinR structure in the BPA trail and is less than 15' above the existinR structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existinR "ructure in an appropriate public riRht-of-way and is less than 15' above the existinR structure, plus any heiRht Rranled under Chapter 22-967(b) b. Variance Process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22. Article II, Division 8 for the followinR proposal., i. The PWSF is collocated on an existinR PWSF and is more than 15' above the existinR facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riRht-of-way and is more than 15' above the structure; or. iii, The PWSF is localed on an existinR structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existinM structure; or. iv, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in an appropriale public riRht-of.way and is mo.e than 15' above the existinR structure. plus any heiRht Mranted under Chapter 22-967(b) c, All other types and locations of PWSFs are not allowed, ], gill'...a eal all! a4 Oft a p'\'Er 41, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVU and the provisions of the PWSF developmenl regulations AI a minimum. ~a five (5) fool Type Ullandscaping!œ! shall be required around the facility, unless the communily development services director detennines that the facility is adequ..ely screened, ~, gaa gaoli. ,JJ gH(a), II..a, New free-standinR PWSFs are not allowed PWSFs shall be ""'" allowed 2!ili: on existing towers. ..,.¡ on publicly used structures not located in public riRhts-of-way. on existinR structures located in the BPA trail. and on existinM slructures in appropriate public riMhts-of-way Refer to Seclion~,966(d) for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs See note I See note I --...+ See note 41 See ~ See note 2 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- , PAGE 3 August 18, 1999 (J r DRAFT Section 4. Section 22-649 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-649. Personal wireless service facility. The fol1owing uses shal1 be pennitted in the single-family residential (RS) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See note ~ 4 for allowed types of PWSFs :3J I'" "", t-l I , I i~ I 0\) R E G II L ~I I . 0 N S -- Process MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT SIDE See note 2 See note I See note I See note I DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- UAvn"""'" DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, , ' THEN, across for REGULATIONS USE ZONE CHART ".. REAR ~ I MAXIMUM CQ\'~R . C~ --¡:¡¡¡¡(¡iif See note I -.--. , PAGE 4 Refer to Sëctiõñ22- 967 for maximum hei~hts for allowed types of ~ See note 2 LANDSCAPE See note 4l SIGNS PARKING I ~~ I SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES See -.; N/A I.tli.i...'at~n..' "¡:"rl~.,.il'" ill.,il..e.~ateet.tle.'~LI)ilo.e.ilof.r..e~.fl~elist,~ ~ Not applicable PWSFs allowed on existin~ structures only, 2 The review process used will be as follows, . P .....111 iftl, p"'Er "."111, .n~,'¡)ill~ hei8hlli..it ., P,..."III iflh, p"'Er i, ..II.¿...~ ell an ¿"isting p"'Er IIr ~_eIielj .'e~ str"el. a el ~ i,l.., II-at I!' ... e IheaÜ"ilgf...ililj ",...el.'., a, Subject to meetin~ all eppliceble development standards, Process III for the followin~ proposals i, The PWSF is collocated on an existin~ PWSF and is les, than IS' above the existin~ facililY; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri~ht-<>f-way and is less than IS' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BP A trail and is less than IS' above the existin~ structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public ri~ht-<>f-way and is less than IS' above the existin~ structure, plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22-967(b) b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin~ proposals: i, The PWSF is collocated on an existin~ PWSF and is more than IS' above the existin~ facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri~ht-<>f-way and is more than IS' above the structure; or, iii The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BPA trail and is more than IS' above the existin~ structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public ri~ht-<>f-way and is more than IS' above Ihe existin~ structure, plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22.967(b) c, All other Iypes and locations of PWSFs are not allowed, J Ei¡[!l' ate ..1 all. d.lI. p"'Er, 43, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in .ccordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF dëvelopment regulalions, At a minimum, ~a five (5) foot Type IIllandscaping!œ! shall be required ~ facility, unless the community development services director delennines that the facility is adequately screened ~, Eoo E ati.. J~ ~H{e) N..., New free-standin~ PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shall be ""'" allowed 2!!!r on existing towers, """ on publicly used structures not located in public ri~hts-<>f-way, on existin~ structures located in the BPA trail, and on existin~ structures in appropriate public ri~hts-<>f-way, Refer to Section 22.966(d) for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs, Not allowed on a PWSF August 18, 1999 DRAFT Section 5. Section 22-681 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-681. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the multifamily residential (RM) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See note ~ 4 for allowed types of PWSFs ~ (JJ m !~ ~ '. Ã , f I( _H'(" '0:) N ~ R E G lJ L. A T I 0 N S Process USE ZONE CHART ü.v.w~,o DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. , , THEN, across for REGULA nONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS See note 2 LOT SIZE bQ:: I MAXIMUM CQ"ERAGE HEIGHT LANDSCAPE FRONT SIDE REAR See note i Refer to Sectiõñ22- 967 for maximum heiRhts for allowed types of PWSFs, Not allowed on a PWSF See note I See note I &ee--+ See note I See note 41 See note 2 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO, 99- , PAGE 5 SIGNS I ZONE I PARKING I RM SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES &eo ~ I. lIi.i",.",.. 4, anilll."" f.rlb... i.a,," ill h. ill ...".....,. III. .,4.I,i..., illS f.r .a.k .flt.li...4 ~ Not .pplicable. PWSFs allowed on «istinR structures only, 2. The review process used will be as follows: a. F,u_Ill ¡fib. r"'EF "'.... It. ."4,,I,illo heishllill.it h, p ......111 iflt. r"'EF i. ..I1.....4.n an olli..i, ð r"'gr .r ,.hli.l) ...4.11..,... a". i. I... iii. I I' ek. . It. ,"i,'i"! fuilil¡ .r .11..1".., a, Subiect to meetinR all applicable development standards, Process III for the foliowinR proposals. i. The PWSF is collocated on an existinR PWSF and i, less than 15' above the exi..inR facility; or. ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riRht-of-way and is less than 15' above the structure: or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in the BPA trail and is less than i5' above the existinR structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in an appropriate public riRht-of-way and is less than 15' above the existinR structure. plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapter 22-967(b), b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 fnr the foliowinR proposals: i. The PWSF is collocated on an existinR PWSF and is more than 15' above the existinR facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located nn a publicly used structure not located in a public riRhl-of.way and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii. The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existinR structure; or. iv, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in an appropriate public BJ¡ht-of-way and is more than 15' above Ihe existinR structure, plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapter 22:967(bJ c, All other types and locations of PWSFs are not allowed N/A ] gi"..lIalali. ..., aP"'EF, 43, All PWSFs ,hall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum, ~a five (5) foot Type III landscaping ~ shall be required ~ facility. unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened ~, gn g...i.,. 03 ~H{.), tI.", New free-standinR PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shall be eM,. allowed 2!!!r on existing towers, "'"' on publicly used structures not located in public riRhts-of-way. on existinR structures located III the BPA trail. and on existinR structures in appropriate public riRhts-of-way Refer to Section 22-966(d) for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs, August 18, 1999 DRAFT Section 6. Section 22-700 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-700. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the professional office (PO) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: lJ }> (1 '.' ,/ r'FI ! R USE ZONE CHART E G DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, THEN, across for REGULATIONS lJ MINIMUMS r 1\)(11 t\Jtlg USE L REQUIRED YARDS A I ZONE I T PO ij I LOT ~ ~ LANDSCAPE SIGNS PARKING Process FRONT SIDE REAR 0 SIZE CQ""~'C¡; HEIGHT N S SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES ::::: ~ N/A I.rioi.d"'~J"J'. "f"ell..ai.., illhai....a~....alatha..~!I)i,g""Jillgf....ah.fllal;91O~ Personal See lIote See See note See See --- See lIote 4,!, Me wireless 2 I note I note I Section 22- -.; ~ Not applicable PWSFs allowed on existin~ structllres only note 967 for 2, The review process used will be as follows, service I ar..aa"IlIifdap"'gF, aa..tl-a_lI~a,I)I~laighlli",il ~ facility hei~hts for !:!.2! h, roea.., 1l1 iftha pn<~r i. a6I1eeala~.. .. ! i..il g p"'~r .. { hlial, _..~ "..al oe ao~ ia I.., thao I!' ahe e (PWSF) ~ ~ tha! i,tiog faaili!) er "",alto.., ~ 2!!..! e, Subject 10 meetin~ all applicable development standards, Process 1l1 for the followin~ proposels' See note ~ ~ ~ i Tbe PWSF is collocated on an existin~ PWSF and is less than 15' above the existin~ facility; or, ii The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri~ht-<>f-way and is less than 15' 4 for above the strucrore: or, allowed See note 2 iii The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BPA trail and is less than 15' above the existin~ types of strucMe: or, PWSFs iv, Tbe PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public ri~ht-<>f.way and is less than 15' 11 above the existinR structure, plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapter 22-967(b) b, Variance process pu"uant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article n, Division 8 for the foliowinR proposals ~ i The PWSF is collocated on an existinR PWSF and is more than 15' above the existin~ facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riRht-<>f-way and is more than IS' above the strucrore, or, iii The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existin~ structure: or, ij iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ struclure in an appropriate public ri~ht-<>f-way and is more than 15' above the existinR structure, plus any heiRht ~ranted under Chapter 22-967(b) c, All other types and locations of PWSFs are not allowed ), Sign. ara 1 a.alla !~.. a r'YSF, :-:::t 43, All PWSFs shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article xvn and the provisions oftha PWSF ~ dëvelopmant regulations, At a minimum, ~a five (5) foot Type III landscaping ~ shall ba required ~ facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened ~, Soo gaa.i.. Ja rHea), ~Ie". New free-standinR PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shell be ""'" allowed 2!!h: on existing towe". """ on publicly used strucMes not located in public riRhts-<>f-way, on axistin~ strucrores located in the BPA trail, and on existin~ st",crores in appropriate public ri~hts-<>f-way Rafer to Section 22-966(d) for ! devalooment standards aoolicabla to allowed tvoes of PWSFs, I ',," I I IN~ I~! I i August 18,1999 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- , PAGE 6 I ¡NI~ I-~' I~: I : ¡ DRAFT Section 7. Section 22-730 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-730. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the neighborhood business (BN) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility (PWSF) See nole ~ 4 for allowed types of PWSFs ""U >~,,-. r.,) , " " -" ;~ m >< J: ~ 00 """3 ,~ '~ R E G lJ L A T I 0 N S Process See nole 2 MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT SIDE See note I See nole I See note I DRAFT ORDINANCE NO, 99- USE ZONE CHART ... v.."'uo DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. . . THEN, across for REGULA nONS REAR w:¡: LANDSCAPE SIGNS MAXIMUM HËiGHT rnu~n",-,= See note I Refer to Section 22- 967 for maximum hei!!hts for allowed types of ~ Not allowed on a PWSF --...+ See note 4.). &eo ftMH See note 2 , PAGE 7 I ZONE I PARKING I BN SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES N/A I. IIi Ii, _11""~' a"i"...ÑlrlJ-eaei..... illh.i."'.'~'l1u...tha.n~.rl;i.8",li.IIÑlraael .flh.Ii...~ -- Not applicable PWSFs allowed on existinR structures only 2, The review process used will be as follows: a, Pra....111 if,h. P"'EF ",....Ih. ..~tll)i, ó haichlli, it h. P..a...1II ifth. P"'EF i. ..1I..ald all., ."iali, II p"'Er or f.hli.l, ...d ....atur. an~ ia I... II1an I~' aha. II . alli..i, 8 faailil) or >.....It"., a, Subject to meetin!! all applicable development standards, Process III for the followin!! proposals: i, The PWSF is collocated on an existin!! PWSF and is less than 15' above the existinR facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riRht-of-way and is less than 15' above the structure; or, iii, ThePWSF is located on an existinRstructure in the BPA trail and is less than 15' abovetheexistinK struCture; or, iv. The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in an appropriate public riKht-of.way and is less than 15' above the exi"inR structure, plus any heiKht wanted under Chapter 22-96 7(b). b, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followinK proposals: i. The PWSF is collocated on an exi"inR PWSF and is more than 15' above the exi"in!! facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on a publicly used "ructure not located in a public riKht-of-way and is more than IS' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existinR "ructure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existinK structure: or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin!! structure in an appropriate public right-of-way and is more than IS' above the exi"inR structure, plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapter 22-967(b) c. All other types JOnd <>cations of PWSFs are not allowed. ,. "'.:':: -C===j_.C=~ -- 0 nH,<~ 43, ÃlI'PWSFs shall be landscaped ~nd screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum, ~a five (5) foot Type IIIlandscaping!œ! shall be required ~ facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened ~, E.. E..,i.. JJ 9U(.), tl.Io, New free.standinR PWSFs are not allowed, PWSFs shall be"", allowed!!!!!r on existing towe", "'"' on publicly used structures not located in public riRhts-of-way, on exi"inR structures located in the BPA trail, and on existinR structures in appropriate public rights-of-way, Refer to Section ~~ for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs, August 18,1999 DRAFT Section 8. Section 22-762 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-762. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the community business (BC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE R E G lJ L A T I ~I s :::::::> Process u Personal wireless service facility See note 2 See note 5 for allowed types of PWSFs ~ G) rn I loa ¡ :-- C.::l -'i ':~ ç, rl USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, ' THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS >UYU"n..o..c " - LOT SIZE ~ MAXIMUM 'HEiGHT LANDSCAPE SIGNS PARKING I ~ I REAR SIDE FRONT r == n..o.= ~~ SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES Me ...... + See note I See note I See note I -.+ Refer to Sëëiiõñ22- 967 for maximum hei~hts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ ~ N/A I.lli,i..."..~, ."¡.vl.Mrll-...i..... iIlh.i...""'~o...t.tl¿..~.rl)i.!...in!for...h.fth.li".d ~ For developed sites, the setback requirements sholl be those of the principal use of the subject property, For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new free-standin~ PWSFs shall be 20' for front, side, and rear yards 2, Subject to meetin~ all applicable development standards, +!he review process used . ill h. .. f.lI. '!!!!!lli Process I, except for the followin~ proposals' 0, P,..... I ¡fth. p"'gr i9 ..1I...t.d., 0 .,,',.. ... p"'gr h,P.....llll'e,.III' fr'.9Ion~' eP"'gr.,. «pI'" .diH.di."."h.l. a, Process III for the followin~ proposals i, The PWSF is located within 300 feet ora residential zone; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the buildin~ or structure, plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, ii, The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school, provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; except as ~ provided in "c," below b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatin~ four or more providers c, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin~ proposals i, The PWSF is collocated on an existin~ PWSF and is more than 15' above the existin~ facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri~ht-of-way and is more than IS' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BP A trail and is more than 15' above the existin~ structure; or, iv The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public ri~ht-of-way and is more than 15' above the existin~ structure, plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, v, The PWSF is located on a buildin~ or structure that is not a residence or school and does not contein a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildin~ or structure, 3 Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more providers; except that a lattice tower of between 120' to 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers 1,giS""""OIl. .dOl oP"'gF M, All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF dõvelopment regulations, At a minimum, ~a five (5) foot Type 1lliandscaping ~ shall be required ~ the facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened, 5 New free-standin~ PWSFs are allowed subject to hei~ht limits and collocation provisions, PWSFs are allowed on existin~ towers, on private buildin", and structures, on publicly used structures not located in public ri~hts-of- way, on existin~ structures located in the BPA trail, and on existin~ structures in appropriate public ri~hts-of-way Refer to Section 22-967 for development stendards applicable to allowed types ofPWSFs Me ~ ~ Not allowed on a PWSF See note 3 , PAGE 8 August 18,1999 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO, 99- ~ í'" _JJ f'f, ci E I ~ ~ ¥' ~ '.c ¡lex> , ~ ' rl DRAFT Section 9. Section 22-802 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-802. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the city center core (CC-C) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility See note 5 ¡;;;-- allowed types of ~ , § -'~ I R E G lJ L A T I 0 N S - -- Process MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT SIDE See note 2 &eo - + See note I See note I ~ DRAFT ORDINANCE NO, 99- REAR ¡,Q:¡: rnUCD Arc See note I s--te-+ , PAGE 9 USE ZONE CHART "AV""~AO DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. , . THEN, across for REGULATIONS MAXIMUM HEiõHT LANDSCAPE SIGNS Refer to Së@õ;i'22- 967 for maximum heiMhts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ i &eo -.; Not allowed on a PWSF See note 3 PARKING I ZONE I CC-C SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES N/A I, r Ii, i 0.... 4 III" i. 0. . 1'5, II' e.e ile' la ill he il au, 4.. ae '" ,~ L 0.4..1) illb ...i.8 fer ...h .f the li..d ~ For developed sites, the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject propeny, For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new free-standin. PWSFs shall be 20' for front, side, alld rear ~ 2, Subiect to meetinM all applicable development standards, 'l'!he review process used ill he.. felle . shall be Process I, except for the followina proposals: a, P,....s I if the p"'Er i. ..lIuald e' a elli..i, e P'VgF, h. P,a._1ll r. all.e f u .1aI 4i, e pouEr., all.e~I". .4",,4 i. "e," kele a, Process III for the foliowinM proposals: i, The PWSF is located within 300 feet ofa residential zone: provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the buildina or structure, plus any heiaht .ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, ii, The PWSF is located on a structure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or sch""lprovided the PWSF is less than 15' above the structure; or, Hi. The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs: except as IIMMiiHe4 provided in "c," below b, Process IV if the PWSF is ala"ice tower accommodatin. four or more providers c, Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Anicle II, Division 8 for the followina proposals' i, The PWSF is collocated on an existinM PWSF and is more than 15' above the existina facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri.ht-of-way and is more than 15' ahove the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existin. structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' ahove the existin. structure; or iv, The PWSF is located on an existina structure in an appropriate public riaht-of-way and is more than 15' above the existina structure, plus any heiaht .ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, v The PWSF is located on a buildinM or structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildin. or structure, 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047. A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more providers; except that a la"ice tower of between 120' to 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers 1,Ei>sara,..alle .4., ar",'gr i1, All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Anicle XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum, _a five (5) foot Type IIllandscaping!æ shall be required ~ facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facility is adequately screened 5 New free-standin. PWSFs are allowed subiect to hei.ht limits and collocation provisions PWSFs are allowed on existin. towers, on private buildinas and structures, on publicly used structures not located in public riahts-of-way, on existina structures located in the BPA trail, and on existina .tructures in appropriate public rights-of.way, Refer to Section 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed!ypes ofPWSFs August 18, 1999 DRAFT Section 10. Section 22-817 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-817. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the city center frame (CC-F) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART USE R E G II ~ I I 0 N S - --' ~ . .. v n,LLI>.LIO DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down toond use, , , THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS ~.._...- u REAR r"-,",,o '-"-" MAXIMUM HEiGiif LANDSCAPE SIGNS PARKING w:¡: LOT SIZE Process SIDE FRONT Personal wireless service facility See nole 2 Me - + See note I See note I ~ Refer to S~2- 967 for maximum hei~hts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ 4 Me -.; See note I ~ Not allowed on a PWSF See note 5 ¡:m:-- allowed types of PWSFs See note 3 m )( = -=:¡ cb = m . :-'. :02 ~ ~ G) m I" 1° : ~~;,,' t', ........ ~ : IV\} NI .....0: i IDRAFTORDINANCE NO. 99- ,PAGE 10 I ZONE I CC-F SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES N/A jIlin" .".."~n.Jli"- .f. 1"""0 . illhoi...oar~. .....k.- ~.rI)i.!!..6i,!!¡;'ro..1 .fth,li...~ ~ For developed sites, the sethack requirements shall he those of the principal use of the subiect propeny For undeveloped sites, Ihe setback requirements for new free-standin~ PWSFs shall be 20' for front, side, and rear ~ 2, Subject to meetin~ all applicable development standards, 'f!he review process used ill h... Mil. . shall be Process I, except for the followin~ proposals: ., Pre".. I iflh r,ugr i. .ell '"..~ e' a eni,li... p"'gr h,Pree.,.lIIferall . froo."'~:np,uH.,..opl"lI1e~ifio~,' "."hele a, Process III for the followin~ proposals: i, The pWSF is localed within 300 feet of a residential wne; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the buildin~ or structure, plus any hei~hl ~ranled under Chapler 22-967(b); or, iL The pWSF is located on a structure Ihat is a residence or school or contains a residence 01 school, ,provided the pWSF is less than 15' above the structure; or, iiL The pWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; except as -- provided in "c," below b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatin~ four or more providers c Variance process porsuant 10 FWCC Chapter 22, Anicle II, Division 8 for the followin~ proposals, i, The PWSF is collocated on an existin~ PWSF and is more than 15' above the existin~ facility; or, iL The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public ri~ht-of-way and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above the existin~ structure; 01, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure tn an appropriate public ri~ht-of-way and is more Ihan 15' above the existin~ structure, plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, v, The PWSF is located on a buildin~ or structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildin~ or structure 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary to provide the service up to 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more providers; except that a lattice tower of between 120' to 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers, 1. gi!, so.. ,elall. .~ ene p"'gr M, All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Anicle XVII and the provisions of the PWSF d;;velopment regulations, Ata minimum,~a five (5) foot Type IIIlandscaping~shall be required~ facility, unless the community development services director determines that the facilily is adequately screened, 5, New free-standin~ PWSFs are allowed subject 10 hei~ht limits and collocation provisions PWSFs are allowed on existin~ towers, on private buildin~ and structures, on publicly used slructures not located in public ri~hts-of-way, on existin~ structures located in the BPA trail, and on existin~ structures in appropriate public riahts-of-way Refer to Section 22-967 for development standard_s .!]Jj>licable to allowed types of PWSFs August 18,1999 DRAFT Section II. Section 22-835 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-835. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be permitted in the office park (OP, OPI--4) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility See note 5 ¡:;;;:--- allowed types of PWSFs ~ G) m -, ~ 1 - - I' \,"-- !~ ~ -0 ~ R E G II L A T I 0 N S Process See note 2 MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS LOT SIZE FRONT Me - + See nole I ~ , DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use, . , THEN, across for REGULATIONS ~nn'..o SIDE ¡,Q:¡: I ZONE I OP, OPl--4 MAXIMUM iŒiGiiT LANDSCAPE REAR SIGNS PARKING £'Lll.llOD..Ar~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES See nole I Lltin' nunJ....lin.. 'Nlrlto..i".. illh,i."""'"""~".~8fl," 8..,.in&I:.o,...1 ,flklli,ld ~ For developed sites, Ihe setback requirements shIll be those oflhe principII use of the subject property For undeveloped sites. Ihe setback requirements for new free-standinR PWSFs shall be 20' for fron~ side, and rear ~ 2 Subiect 10 meetinR all applicable development 'tandards, +!he review process used ill h... f.1I1 ,shall be Process I, except for the foliowinR proposals 1,1"11....1 ifltl p"'sr i, IIIIIII"~ II I l"i8li, II P"'Sr. h,Pr......lllr"all.1 fl!!_~il¡,p"'Er,,1 "~I"" ,~i¡:¡l~i."I"hda I, Process 111 for the foliowinR proposals: i, The PWSF is located within 300 feet of a residential zone; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above Ihe buildinR or structure. plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapler 22-967(b); or, ii, The PWSF is located on I structure that is a residence or school or contain, a residence or schoo); provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the "ructure; or, iii. The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; except as IIIMirierI provided in "C," below, b. Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatinR four or more providers, c, Variance process pursuant 10 FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the foliowinR proposals, i, The PWSF is collocated on an existinR PWSF and is more than 15' above the exi8linR facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used "ructure not located in I public riRht-of.way and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existinR "ructure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above Ihe existinR structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existinR structure in an appropriate public riRhl-of-wav and is more than 15' above the existinR structure, plus any heiRht Rranted under Chapter 22-967(b), or, v, The PWSF is located on a build inK or structure Ihat is not a residence or school and does nol contain a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildinK or structure, ), Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary 10 provide the service up 10 100', plus any heighl granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up 10 120' if there are two or more providers; except thata lanice tower of between 120' 10 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers 1, £i8111.. nIl 1111 ,~an a p"'Er. ~, All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum, _a five (5) foot Type III landscaping!!!:! shall be required around the facility, unless the community development services direclOr detennines that the facility is adequately screened, 5, New free-standinR PWSFs are allowed subiect 10 heiRht limits and collocation provisions PWSFs are allowed on existinR lOwers, on private build inKs and "ructures, on publicly used structures nol located in public riRhts-of-wav, on existinK structures located in the BPA trail, and on existinK struclures in appropriate public rights-of-way Refer 10 Section 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed IVpes of PWSFs See note 1 ~ Refer 10 SectiõñI2. 967 for maximum heiKhts for allowed Iypes of ~ See note ~ ~ &. -.; N/A Not allowed on a PWSF See note 3 ,PAGE II August 18, 1999 DRAFT Section 12. Section 22-871 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-871. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the business park (BP) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART USE R E G II L A TI 0 N S ~ --- C9"bP . £I; MAXIMUM ~ LANDSCAPE SIGNS PARKING MiNIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS , ... ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down 10 find use. . . THEN, across for REGULA nONS 'H""""~ u ~ LOT SIZE REAR SIDE Process FRONT Personal wireless service facilily See note 2 See ...... .¡. See note I See note I See note I -..+ Refer to S~22- 967 for maximum hei~hts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ ~ See ~ ~ Not allowed on a PWSF ~ ø m It:) See nole 5 ~ allowed types of PWSFs ~ See nole 3 t "~¡I~ I f\ DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- , PAGE 12 . I ~~ I SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES N/A IIli i, d"o,d,..i"".,,f, lI..aita's illhai,aawdo,aalalta.,d"ljiI8.A!,i'8fer..ahafllali"ad ~ For developed siles the setback requirements shall be Ihose of the principal use of the subject property For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new free-standin~ PWSFs shall be 20' for front, side, and rear ~ 2, Subiect to meetin~ all applicable development standards, :¡:!he review process used ill ha.. fella s shall be Process I, excepl for the followin~ proposals, 0, Pra"" I iftha P"'H is aalla.aled a, 0 "i5li'8 P"'EF, h, Pra,." III fu all.a fraa,1ot Ail e p'HErs; a""pl'" adilhd i. "a" kala a, Process III for the followin~ proposals i, The PWSF is localed within 300 feet ofa residential zone; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the buildin~ or struclure, plus any hei~hl ~ranled under Chapter 22-967(b); or, ii The PWSF is located on a struclure that is a residence or school or contains a residence or school; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the struclure; or, iii, The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; except as....,.¡ifteè provided in "c," below b. Process IV if the PWSF is a lattice tower accommodatin~ four or more providers c, Variance process pursuanl to FWCC Chapler 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin~ proposals: i, The PWSF is collocaled on an existin~ PWSF and is more than 15' above the existin~ facility; or, ii, The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not localed in a public ri~ht-of-way and is more than 15' above the structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in the BPA trail and is more than 15' above Ihe existin~ structure; or, iv The PWSF is located on an existin~ structure in an appropriate public ri~ht-of-way and is more than 15' above the existin~ struclure, plus any hei~ht ~ranted under Chapler 22-967(b); or, v, The PWSF is located on a buildin~ or structure that is not a residence or school and does not contain a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildin~ or structure 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessuy to provide the service upto 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047, A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more providers; except that a lattice lower of bel ween 120' to 150' will be allowed under a combined application of four or more providers 1. Ei8"' a.. , atall, ,d OJ a p"'Er, ~, All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF development regulations, At a minimum, ~a five (5) foot Type III landscaping!!œ! shall be required ~ facility, unless the communily development services director delennines Ihat the facilily is adequalely screened 5 New free-standin~ PWSFs are allowed subiect to hei~ht limits and collocation provisions, PWSFs are allowed on existin~ towers, on private buildinlU and slructures, on publicly used structures not localed in public ri~hts-of-way, on exislin~ structures located in the BPA trail, and on existin~ structures in appropriale public rilÙ>ts-of-way Refer 10 Section 22-967 for developmenl standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs, August 18, 1999 DRAFT Section 13. Section 22-906 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-906. Personal wireless service facility. The following uses shall be pennitted in the corporate park (CP-I) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE u Personal wireless service facility See nole 5 ¡¡;;-- allowed types of PWSFs ~ G) m m >< :J: Co--=- OJ ["C;¡.~ -~ - \)) ( .I~Q:) -, J N -.() R E G LJ L A T I 0 N S :::::> USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. . . THEN, across for REGULATIONS MtNtMUMS REQUIRED YARDS ... vnmuo ¡,g:¡: PARKING I ~~~~ I LOT SIZE MAXIMUM ~ Process LANDSCAPE SIGNS FRONT SIDE REAR r~"CD.r~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES See nole 2 Lt!i,i ,0...,4""iO1o, .r.,lh..oilo" iIIhoi.a...4...."'Ib.o,~orli"~..,i.gr..r...h.fth.li,,.4 ~ For developed sites, the selback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subjecl property For undeveloped sites, the setback requirements for new free-slandina PWSFs shall be 20' for fron~ side, and rear ~ 2, Subject to meetin, all applicable developm..' standards, 'l'¡he review. process used ill ho.. rollo . sholl be Process I, except for the followin, proposals' a. P,..... I if lb. p"'&r i. ..1I"oaI04 ai, a o"i.ti.g r"'sr, h, P .....111 fa, 111.. r.. a!tlndi.g p"'sr ,o".a~I"" .~i¡¡a~ in "a," hda .. Process III for the followin, proposals i. The PWSF is located within 300 feet of a residential zone; provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the buildin, or structure, plus any heiaht aranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, ii, The PWSF is located on a structure thot is 0 residence or school or contain, a residence or school, provided the PWSF is less than 15' above the structure; or, iii. The PWSF is a new free-standing PWSFs; excepl as....,iftee provided in "C," below b, Process IV if the PWSF is a lanice lOwer accommodatin, four or more providers c. Variance process pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Article II, Division 8 for the followin, proposals i. The PWSF is collocaled on an existina PWSF and is more than 15' above the existin, facility; or, ii. The PWSF is located on a publicly used structure not located in a public riaht-of.way and is more than 15' above Ihe structure; or, iii, The PWSF is located on an existin, structure in the BPA trail and is more Ihan 15' above the existin, structure; or, iv, The PWSF is located on an existin, structure in an appropriate public ri¡¡ht-of-way and is more than IS' above the existin, s!ructure, plus any hei,ht ,ranted under Chapter 22-967(b); or, v, The PWSF is localed on a buildin, or structure that is nola residence or school and does not conlain a residence or school; provided the PWSF is more than 15' above the buildin, or structure 3, Maximum allowed height for a new free-standing PWSF shall be the minimum necessary 10 provide the service up 10 100', plus any height granted under Chapter 22-1047 A PWSF shall be allowed up to 120' if there are two or more provide,,; except thai a lanice tower of between 120' 10 150' will be allowed under a combined applicalion of four or more provide" 1. Sig.. au nalallo a4 0" a P":Sf, M. All PWSF shall be landscaped and screened in accordance with Article XVII and the provisions of the PWSF dëvelopmenl regulalions, At a minimum, _a five (5) foot Type III landscaping![!:! shall be required around the facility, unless Ihe community developmenl services direcoor determines that the facility is adequately screened 5, New free-slandin, PWSFs are allowed subject 10 hei,ht limits and collocation provisions PWSFs are allowed on existin, lowers, on private buildin.. and structures, on publicly used struclures nol located in public ri,hts-of-wav. on existin, structures located in the BPA trail, and on existina structures in appropriate public rights-of-way Refer to Section 22-967 for development standards applicable to allowed types of PWSFs See - .¡. See note I See note I See note I ~ Refer 10 Sectiõñ22. 967 for maximum hei,hts for allowed types of ~ See note ~ ~ See .....,.; N/A Nol allowed on a PWSF None See note 3 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- , PAGE 13 August 18, 1999 DRAFT Section 14. Section 22-966 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-966. Personal wireless service facilities (PWSF). (a) Purpose. This section addresses the issues of location and appearance associated with personal wireless service facilities. It provides adequate siting opportunities through a wide range of locations and options which minimize safety hazards and visual impacts sometimes associated with wireless communications technology. The siting of facilities on existing buildings or structures, collocation of several providers' facilities on a single support structure, and visual mitigation measures are required, unless otherwise allowed by the city, to maintain neighborhood appearance and reduce visual clutter in the city. (b) Definitions. Any words, terms or phrases used in this section which are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in section 22-1 of this Code. (c) Exemptions. The following antennas and facilities are exempt from the provisions of this section and shall be permitted in all zones consistent with applicable development standards as outlined in the Use Zone Charts, Article XL District Regulations: (1) (2) (3) , Wireless communication facilities used bv federal. state, or local public agencies for temporary emergency communications in the event of a disaster, emergency preparedness, and public health or safety purposes. Industrial processing equipment and scientific or medical equipment using frequencies regulated by the FCC; provided such equipment complies with all mmJicable provisions of Section 22-960, Rooftop Appurtenances. and Chapter 22. Article XIII. Division 5. Height. Citizen band radio antennas or antennas operated by federally licensed amateur ("ham") radio operators: provided such antennas complv with all applicable provisions of Section 22-960. Rooftop Appurtenances. and Chapter 22. Article XIII. Division 5. Height. (4) SateUiliutish antennas less than two meters in diameter. including direct-to-home satellite services. when used as a secondary use of the property: provided such antennas comply with all applicable provisions of Section 22-960. Rooftop Appurtenances, and Chapter 22. Article XIII. Division 5. Height. (5) Automated meter reading (AMR) facilities for the purpose of collecting utility meter data for use in the sale of utility services. except for whip or other antennas greater than two (2) feet in length: provided the AMR facilities are within the scope of activities permitted under a valid franchise agreement between the utility service provider and the city. DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- EXH~Er-' , PAGE If'A3 [_Let ß .~î~gust 18, 1999 DRAFT (6) Routine maintenance or repair of a wiretess communication facitity and related equipment excluding structural work or changes in height. dimensions. or visual impacts of the antenna. tower. or buildings~ provided that compliance with the standards of this chapter are maintained. W@ Prioritized locations. The following sites shall be the required order of locations for proposed PWSFs, including antenna and equipment shelters, ooless the eity eleets tø mødify the priøritizatiøn. In r-eE}uestiFlg proposing a PWSF in a particular location, the applicant shall analyze the feasibility of locating the proposed PWSF in each of the higher prioritv locations and document, to the city's satisfaction, why a locatiefting the PWSF in each higher priority location and/or zone is not being proposed. In order of preference, based OF!. an assessmeNt of feasibility the sites prioritized locations for PWSFs are as follows: (3) (4) (I) Structures located in the BP A trail: A PWSF mav be located GQn any existing support structure currently located in the easement upon which are located U.S. Department of Energy/Bonneville Power Administration ("BPA") Power Lines regardless of underlying zoning. (2) Existing broadcast, relay and transmission towers: A PWSF mav be located GQn any existing site or tower where a legal wireless telecommunication facility is currently located regardless of underlying zoning. If an existing site or tower is located within a one mile radius of a proposed PWSF location. the applicant shall document whv collocation on the existing site or tower is not being proposed. regardless of whether the existing site or tower is located within the jurisdiction of the citv. Publicly-used structures: If the city consents to such location, attaeked to a PWSF mav be located on existing public facilities within all zoning districts. such as water towers, utility structures, fire stations, bridges, and other public buildings witkiN all zaRiNg distriets~ provided the public facilities are not located within public rights-of-way. Appropriate Bbusiness, commercial.. and city center zoned sites: 8truetures or sites useà for researeh afld àe'/eløpmeNt, eommereial and offiee uses. A PWSF may be located on private buildings or structures within appropriate business. commercial. and city center zoning districts. The preferred order of zoning districts for this category of sites is as follows: BP--Business Park CP-I--Corporate Park Ex~nB~~. B ....'.....---..- PAGE /s v1u~~~ OP through OP-4--0ffice Park DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- ,PAGE 15 August 18, 1999 DRAFT CC-C--City Center Core CC-F--City Center Frame BC--Community Business (5) Appropriate public rif!hts-of-wav: For the purposes of this section. appropriate public rights-of-way shall be defined as including those public rights-of-way with functional street classifications of principal arterial. minor arterial. and principal collector. A PWSF may be located on existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way. Structures proposed for location ofPWSFs shall be separated by at least 330 linear feet. There shall be no more than one PWSF located on an existing structure. Existing structures in appropriate public rights-of-way shall not be eligible for submittal of a use process application for placement of a PWSF for one vear from the date of the completion of construction or alteration. Location of a PWSF on an existing structure in an appropriate public right-of-way shall require a right-of-way permit in addition to the required use process approval. The preferred order of functional street classifications for this category of sites is ,as follows: Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Principal Collector If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and the surrounding uses or zoning are not the same. that portion of the right-of-way with the most intensive use and/or zoning shall be the preferred location. If the PWSF is proposed to be located in an appropriate public right-of-way and surrounding uses or zoning are the same. the preferred location shall be that portion ofthe right-of-way with the least adverse visual impacts. ~@ If the applicant demonstrates to the city's satisfaction that it is not technically possible to site in a prioritized location, the city reserves the right to approve alternative site locations if a denial would be in violation of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, as determined by the city. Sec. 22-967. Development Standards (d ) De'Þ'elepment standards. The following development standards shall be followed in DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- EXHJ8r~ B , PAGE 16PA'- E'" .- ... ---m:tgust 18, 1999 'G' t. ~ ~ .29 DRAFT the design, siting, and construction of a personal wireless service facility. fB PWSFs shall be sereeaed or eamol:1flaged thrOl:lgh employiag the best ayailable teel:mology B:fI.d design, as deteffiiiaed by the eity. This may be aeeomplisbed by Hse of compatible materials, loeatioa, eolør, stealth teelmiflHes SHea as, but not limited to artifieial trees 8f1d hollow flag poles, and/or other tactics to achieve miaiml:H'H '¡isibility øfthe facility as yie'.ved from pl:lblie streets or resideatial properties. ~ Building or structure mounted PWSFs not in the right of way. PWSFs may be mounted on nomesideatial existing buildings and structures not located in a public right-of-way shall confonn to the following development standards Hader the following conditions: (1) The PWSF shall consist onlv of the following types of facilities: a. The P'.vSF eoasists of a A microcell or a minor facility: or. b. A PWSF that exceeds the minor facility thresholds for number of antennas. dimensions. and/or area. but creates no more adverse impacts than a minor facility. as detennined bv the director of community development services. subject to meeting all of the following standards: I. The facilitv shall not create substantiallv more adverse visual impact than a minor facilitv: and. 11. The equipment cabinet for the PWSF shall meet all requirements ofFWCC 22-967(e): and. 111. The maximum size of the PWSF panels and number of antennas shall be detennined bv the director of communi tv development services. based on the specific project location. surrounding environment. and potential visual impacts: and. IV. The PWSF shall complv with all other applicable standards of the FWCC. è-. ill The combined antennas and supporting structure shall HOt may extend more than up to. but not exceed. 15 feet above the existing or proposed roof or other structure regardless of whether the existing structure is in confonnance with the existing maximum height of the underlying zone as outlined in the Use Zone Charts. Article XI. District Regulations. Antennas may be mounted to rooftop appurtenances provided they do not extend beyond 15 feet above the roof proper. e-. ill The antennas are mounted on the building or structure such that they are located DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- ,PAGEI7E}{H~Br"""" 8_._----.-AtigustIS,1999 PAGE 17 ,"/" ~Cf DRAFT and designed to minimize visual and aesthetic impacts to surrounding land uses and structures and shall, to the greatest extent practical, blend into the existing environment pursuant to Section 967( d). Panel and parabolic antennas shall be completely screened from residential views and public rights-of-way unless meeting the provision of section 22-960(b )(2). (b) PWSFs located on structures within appropriate public rÜ!hts-of-wav. These fu£ilities shall conform to the following development standards: ill The PWSF shall consist only of the following types of facilities: a. The PW8F eollsists of a A microcell or a minor facility: or, b. A PWSF that exceeds the minor facility thresholds for number of antennas, dimensions. and/or area, but creates no more adverse impacts than a minor facility, as determined by the director of community development services. subject to meeting all of the following standards: 1. The facilitv shall not create substantially more adverse visual impact than a minor facility: and, H. The equipment cabinet for the PWSF shall meet all requirements ofFWCC 22-967(e) and FWCC 22-967(t): and, HI. The maximum size of the PWSF panels and number of antennas shall be determined bv the director of community development services. based....Q!l1he specific project location, surrounding environment, and potential visual impacts: and, IV. The PWSF shall comply with all other applicable standards of the FWCC. (2) The combined antennas may extend up to, but not exceed, 15 feet above the existing structure. This distance may be increased by the minimum necessary ~ht to meet the safety clearances required by the operator of the existing structure. The antenna extension may be permitted regardless of whether the existing structure is in conformance with the maximum height of the underlying zone as outlined in the Use Zone Charts, Article XL District Res;rulations. (3) The antennas shall be mounted on the structure such that they are located and designed to minimize adverse visual and aesthetic impacts to surrounding land uses and structures and shalL to the greatest extent practicaL blend into the existing environment pursuant to Section 967( d). DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- E~fUílf"""'"' ~-- 8 . !-'., W"1\ \j ~~j ,PAGE 18 PJ-\Gi L~~ -/" ~ August 18, 1999 (4) (5) DRAFT Structures in appropriate public rights-of-way proposed for location of PWSFs shall be separated bv at least 330 linear feet. ReQuired~ not pertain to PWSFs withi!lm!QJic rights of wavs. ~ New fFee standiBg PW8Fs New free-standinJ! PWSFs. These structures shall confonn to the following site development standards: a-:ill Placement of a freestanding PWSF shall be denied if placement of the antennas on an existing structure can meet the applicant's technical and network location requirements. lr.ill Monopoles shall be the only free-standing structures allowed in the city; except that a lattice tower may be used to accommodate the collocation of four or more providers as part of a joint pennit application. ill e{4} In no case shall a free-standing PWSFs be located closer than 500 feet to an existing free-standing PWSF whether it is owned or utilized bv the applicant or another provider. A free-standing PWSF, including the support structure and associated electronic equipment, shall comply with all required setbacks of the zoning district in which it is located. For developed sites. the setback requirements shall be those of the principal use of the subject propertv. For undeveloped sites. the setback requirements for new free-standing PWSFs shall be 20 feet for front. side. and rear yards. à-.ill Free-standing PWSFs shall be designed and placed on the site in a manner that takes maximum advantage of existing trees, mature vegetation, and structures so as to: ~{Q} f-.ill -ha. Use existing site features to screen as much of the total PWSF as possible from prevalent views; and/or ~.Q. Use existing site features as a background so that the total PWSF blends into the background with increased sight distances. In reviewing the proposed placement of a facility on the site and any associated landscaping the city may condition the application to supplement existing trees and mature vegetation to more effectively screen the facility. Support structures, antennas, and any associated hardware shall be painted a nonreflective color or color scheme appropriate to the background against which DRAFT ORDINANCE NO, 99- E ~..v n- R n D r,- -:- ß ¿,~ f!:~ [1 g i ' ,PAGE 19 PAl """ "-'", 'I , c¡ . :' ~... { 2.; ~ c: ~.. ~ .. -Ættgust 18, 1999 DRAFT the PWSF would be viewed from a majority of points within its viewshed. The Pproposed color or color scheme te shall be approved by the hearing examiner or community development director as appropriate to the ¡:>roeess. (d) Screening standards for all PWSFs. PWSFs shall be screened or camouflaged through employing the best available technology and design. as determined by the city. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials. location. landscaping. color. stealth techniques such as. but not limited to. artificial trees and hollow flag poles. and/or other methods or techniques to achieve minimum visibility of the facility as viewed from public streets or residential properties. In addition. the provisions for landscaping as outlined in the Use Zone Charts. Article XI. District Regulations. shall apply. ~~ Standards for electronics eauivment enclosures. aill Ð-.0 Equipment enelosures shall be placed underground if practieable. The following shall be the required order of locations for proposed electronic equipment enclosures for all PWSFs. In proposing an equipment enclosure in a particular location. the applicant shall analvze the feasibilitv of locating the proposed equipment enclosure in each of the higher priority locations and document to the citv's satisfaction. why a locating the equipment enclosure in each higher priority location is not being proposed. In requesting a lower priority location for the equipment enclosure. the burden of demonstrating impracticabilitv shall be on the applicant. In order of preference. the prioritized locations for equipment enclosures are as follows: (a) Equipment enclosures shall be placed underground. (b) Equipment enclosures shall be placed in an existing completelv enclosed building. (c) Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground in an enclosed cabinet that shaU not exceed six feet in height and OCCUpy more than 48 square feet of floor area. including areas for maintenance or future expansion. (d) Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground in a new completely enclosed building. If above ground, sereening of PWSF equipment enclosures shall be provided screened with one or a combination of the following materials methods, which screening shall be acceptable to the city: fencing, walls, landscaping, structures, buildings or topography which will block the view of the equipment enclosure as ml:1ch as to the greatest extent possible from any street and/or adjacent properties~ as determined by the director of communitv development services. Screening may be located anywhere between the enclosure and the above mentioned viewpoints. E){~~û[~-' 8 , PAGE 20 P ¡', ' -., ~~... ~() J.q r\ua:.....--.~ . August 18, 1999 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- (4) (3) DRAFT Landscaping for the purposes of screening shall be maintained in a healthy condition, as determined by the city. Except for equipment enclosures in public rights of wavs. enclosures shall be located outside of required setback areas. If the equipment cabinet is located within a new completely enclosed building. the building shall conform to all applicable development standards and design ~uidelines for the underlying zone. The completelv enclosed building shall be architecturally designed and shall be compatible with existing buildings on the site. The completely enclosed building shall be screened to the greatest extent possible from anv street and/or adjacent properties by landscaping and/or topography. (D Additional standards for equipment enclosures for PWSFs located on structures within appropriate public rif!hts-of-wav: (1) The following shall be the required order of locations for proposed electronic equipment enclosures for PWSF located within public rights-of-way. In proposing an equipment enclosure in a particular location. the applicant shall analvze the feasibility of locating the proposed equipment enclosures in each of the higher prioritv locations and document. to the city's satisfaction. whv a locating the equipment enclosure in each higher priority location is not being proposed. In requesting a lower priority location for the equipment enclosure. the burden of demonstrating impracticability shall be on the applicant. In order of preference. the prioritized locations for equipment enclosures are as follows: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Equipment enclosures shall be placed underground on an adjacent property outside of the public right-of-way. Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground on an adjacent property outside of the public right-of-way in an existing completely enclosed building. Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground on an adjacent propertv outside of the public right-of-wav in an enclosed cabinet that shall not exceed six feet in height and occupy more than 48 square feet of floor area. including areas for maintenance or future expansion. Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground on an adjacent propertv outside of the public right-of-way in a new completely enclosed building. Equipment enclosures shall be placed underground within the public right- E}(~~~B --~ 8 ,PAGE 2\ P~ F, /:~~ ~~',' .21 ., Q Äügust \8, \999 K~ L...--- "'~, -<. ~I DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- (2) (3) (4) DRAFT of-way. (t) Equipment enclosures shall be placed above ground within the public right-of-wav in an enclosed cabinet that shall not exceed six feet in height and OCCUPy more than 24 square feet of floor area. including areas for maintenance or future expansion. Equipment enclosures shall be designed. located. and screened to minimize adverse visual impacts from the public right-of-way and adjacent properties. Equipment enclosures shall be designed. located. and screened to minimize adverse visual and functional impacts on the pedestrian environment. Equipment enclosures and screening shall not adversely impact vehicular sight distance. e-. No váreless equipment reviewed under this section shall be located vlÍthin required Ðailding setback areas. ~g) Securitv Fencing. 8eeurity feReiag, if lised, shall eønform to the folløwing: a-.ru e-.ill e-.ill No fence shall exceed six feet in height as stipulated in section 22-1133(5). Security fencing shall be effectively screened from view through the use of appropriate landscaping materials. Chain-link fences shall be painted or coated with a nonreflective color. ~ili} Cumulative Effects. The city shall consider the cumulative visual effects of PWSFs mounted on existing structures and/or located on a given permitted site in determining whether the additional permits eaÐ may be granted so as to not adversely effect the visual character of the city. f11ill SÍf!naí!:e. No wireless equipment shall be used for the purpose of mounting signs or message displays of any kind, except for signs used for identification and name of provider. f*)G) (1) Use zone charts, height and permit process. The final approval authority for applications made under this section shall be defined by the appropriate permit process as outlined in the Use Zone Charts, Article XI, District Regulations. E'\f~~ ~ ~ ." J't. b ~... I_oj P ^ r). f'"= PAGE 2 k: "? ", 2, ,? , w -......., ~o --... -~ 8 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- 0 -~~ugust 18, 1999 DRAFT (2) Allowed heights shall be established relative to appropriate process as outlined in the Use Zone Charts, Article XI, District Regulations. Sec. 22-968. Nonconformance. Permit avplications made under this section to locate a PWSF on property on which a nonconformance is located shall be exempt from the requirements of Chapter 22. Article IV. Nonconformance. to bring the property into conformance as follows: (a) To provide the public improvements required by Chapter 22. Article XVI. Improvements. as stipulated in Section 22-336. (b) To bring the property into conformance with the development regulations prescribed in Chapter 21 relating to water qualitv as stipulated in Section 22-337(a)(7). All other requirements of Section 22-337 to bring the property into conformance with the development regulations prescribed in Chapter 21 relating to water qualitv shall apply. Section 22-969. Temporary Personal Wireless Service Facilities. As determined by the director of communitv development services. a temporary personal wireless service facilitv. or cell-on- wheels. mav be deploved and operated as follows: (a) For a period of90 days during the construction of a free-standing PWSF which has been approved through the appropriate permit process: provided that the temporary personal wireless service facility or cell-on-wheels creates no more adverse impacts than the PWSF which was approved through the appropriate permit process. Only one temporary personal wireless service facilitv or cell-on- wheels shall be permitted for a single site. (b) F or a period of 30 davs during an emergency declared by the city. state. or federal government that has caused a free-standing PWSF which has been approved through the appropriate permit process to become involuntarily non-operational: provided that the temporary personal wireless service facility or cell-on-wheels creates no more adverse impacts than the PWSF which was approved through the appropriate permit process. (c) Prior to installation of the temporary PWSF. the applicant shall provide the city with a cash bond in an amount to be determined by the director of community development services in order to guarantee performance of future removal and restoration of the site. Section 22-970. Application Requirements. (g) Applicf:ltiøl'l refjbliremel'lts. (a) Except for Temporary Personal Wireless Facilities. PQermit applications made under this section shall include the following minimum information in addition to that required for the underlying permit review process: Ej~~~rEt~~ ,PAGE r- j.'.:"'. --. ...il-?; ß u',.",,-,,'- DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- ~August 18,1999 (I) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) DRAFT A diagram or map showing the primary viewshed of the proposed facility. Photo simulations of the proposed facility from effected properties and public rights-of-way at varying distances. Architectural elevations of proposed facility and site. A coverage chart of the proposed PWSF at the requested height and an explanation of the need for that facility at that height and in that location. The explanation shall include an analysis of alternative sites and why the rel:}uested site is preferred over other possible loeations the feasibility of locating the proposed PWSF in each of the higher priority locations as identified in Section 22-966( d). and documentation of why locating the PWSF in each higher priority location and/or zone is not being proposed. An inventory of other PWSF sites operated by the applicant or other providers that are either in the city or within ~one mile of its borders radius of the proposed PWSF location, including specific information about location, height, and design of each facility. A site/landscaping plan showing the specific placement of the PWSF on the site; showing the location of existing structures, trees, and other significant site features; and indicating type and locations of plant materials used to screen PWSF components. (7) If the PWSF electronic equipment cabinet is proposed to be located above ground, ~ess of the proposed location. whether on private or public property or within public right of way, an explanation of why it is impracticable to locate the cabinet undergrouund. (8) If the equipment cabinet is proposed to be located in a public right-of-way. an explanation of whv it is impracticable to locate the equipment cabinet on adjacent property outside the public right-of-way. tBí.22 Documentation of efforts to collocate on existing facilities. f&1(lQ} Other information as deemed necessary by the community development director. (b) Permit applications for Temporary Personal Wireless Service Facilities shall include the following minimum information: (1) Documentation of previously permitted facility. E)(~=H~~," ß PAGE~-,-. ~ , PAGE 24 August 18, 1999 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO, 99- DRAFT (2) Site plan snowing proposedJocation of temporary facility in relationship to the location of the previously permitted facility and property boundaries. including dimensions from the property lines and height of proposed facility. (3) Photographs of the proposed facility. Section 22-971. Collocation. (h)Cef.l.ecatiel'l. ~ A permittee shall cooperate with other PWSF providers in collocating additional antenna on support structures and/or on existing buildings and sites provided said proposed collocatees have received a permit for such use at said site from the city. A permittee shall allow other providers to collocate and share the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level impairment of the permitted use (as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee has exercised good faith in accommodating a new applicant, the city may require a third party technical study at the expense of the permittee. Failure to comply with this provision may result in a revocation of the permit. ~ A signed statement indicating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential collocation of additional PWSF equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same site location shall be submitted by the applicant as part of the permit application. If an applicant contends that future collocation is not possible on their site, they must submit a technical study documenting why. Section 22-972. EMF Standards and Interference. (i) E}'{P stal'ldanls éms interference. ~ The applicant shall comply with federal standards for EMF emissions. Within six months after the issuance of its operational permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency (EMF) power densities of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report shall quantify the EMF emissions.. aaà compare the results with established federal standards. and provide a statement that the EMF emissions are within established federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the city for consistency with the project proposal report and the adopted federal standards. If on review, the city finds that the PWSF does not meet federal standards, the city may revoke or modify the permit. The applicant shall be given a reasonable time based on the nature of the problem to comply with the federal standards. If the permit is revoked, then the facility shall be removed. ~(Q} The applicant shall ensure that the PWSF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts or the functioning of other electronic EXH ~ E r~-- PAG~ j\" ~ 5 ' r- r\ .:"'-: '-'.- -_.- 8 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- ø?!l._- August 18, 1999 DRAFT devices. If on review of a registered complaint the city finds that the PWSF interferes with such reception, the city may revoke or modify the permit. The applicant shall be given a reasonable time based on the nature of the problem to correct the interference. If the permit is revoked, then the facility shall be removed. Section 22-973. Removal of Facility. @ Facility removal. ~ Abandonment and removal. The owner or operator of a PWSF shall provide the citv with a copy of the notice of intent to cease operations required by the FCC at the time it is submitted to the FCC. Additionally, +lhe owner or operator of a PWSF shall notify the city in writing ~ of the discoRtiftUed use abandonment of a particular facility within 30 davs of the date the PWSF is abandoned. The abandoned PWSF shall be removed by the facility owner within 90 days ofthe date the site's use is diseontinl:1ed PWSF is abandoned, it ceases to be operational, the permit is revoked, or if the facility falls into disrepair and is not maintained, as determined by the city. Disrepair includes structural features, paint, landscaping, or general lack of maintenance which could result in adverse safety or visual impacts. If there are two or more users of a single tower, then the city's right to remove the tower shall not become effective until all users abandon the tower. (b) Partial abandonment and removal. If the abandoned antennas on any PWSF are removed or relocated to a point where the top 20 percent or more of the height of the supporting structure is no longer in use. the PWSF shall be considered partially abandoned. The owner or operator of any partially abandoned PSWF shall notifv the city in writing of the partial abandonment of a particular facility within 30 days ofthe date the PWSF is partiallv abandoned. The owner of the PWSF shall have 120 days from the date of partial abandonment to collocate another service on the PWSF. If another service provider is not added to the PWSF within the allowed 120 day collocation period, the owner shall in 210 davs of partial abandonment. dismantle and remove that portion of the supporting structure which exceeds the point at which the highest operational antenna is mounted. ~ c) Removal and lien. Ifthe provider fails to remove the abandoned or partially abandoned facility upon 9G 210 days of its discontinued use abandonment or partial abandonment, the responsibility for removal falls upon the property owner on which the abandoned or partially abandoned facility has been is located. If the proflerty O'.vner fails to remo':e the faeility withifi 30 da-ys of fiotification by the city, the city or its agent may enter upon the sl:lbjeet property afld eal:lse the facility to be removed at the property ovmer's exflense. The city shall thefi sefid to the property owner a verified statemefit of the cost of expenses. The property owner shall be liable f{)r the pa-ymern of such costs and expefises. In the event the proflerty OVŒer fails to pay the costs and expenses, the city may file a lien against the proflerty owner's real property ifl the amouRt of such costs and expenses and record such lien \vith the Kifig County Records Office. The city may enforce this paragraph using the procedures as set forth in FWCC, Article 3, Section 1-14. DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- , PAGE 26 E)(HJ8~~ F.';' ,""' "')J .;-'.. -... '.-, ~ 8 2'j...August 18, 1999 DRAFT Section 22-974. Permit Limitations. W Permit limitations. fBW A permit for a PWSF shall expire ten years after the effective date of the permit approval, unless earlier revoked by the city. A permittee wishing to continue the use of a specific PWSF at the end of the ten-year period must apply for an application to continue that use at least six months prior to its expiration. The renewal application shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations dictating new permit issuance. In ruling on said renewal the city shall consider all then existing regulations effecting the application that are appropriate to the technology and use. ~).Gù Five years after the date oftae øity's atJpro<;al effective date of the land use process approval of a PWSF.. the permittee or assignee shall submit a written statement summarizing its current use and plans, if any, for that facility/site for the next five years to the best of their knowledge. ~Í£Ì Consistent with the provisions of Section 22-408. Âf!Il approved permit for a PWSF shall be valid for one year from the date of the øity's approval effective date of the use process approval, with opportunity for a one-year extension. If Rot used a building permit application is not received within one year of the effective date of the use process approval, or within the extension period, the permit use process approval shall become null and void. Section 22-975. Revocation of Permit. æ Rew}(:ati8l'l 81 permit. A permit issued under this article may be revoked, suspended or denied for anyone or more of the following reasons: fl'K~ Failure to comply with any federal, state or local laws or regulations; ~(b) Failure to comply with any ofthe terms and conditions imposed by the city on the issuance of a permit; ~ When the permit was procured by fraud, false representation, or omission of material facts; ~ Failure to cooperate with other PWSF providers in collocation efforts as required by this article; ~ Failure to comply with federal standards for EMF emissions; and fétill Failure to remedy localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts or the functioning of other electronic devices. E~.p' IUl n ~,' :". -. 1~, ~-M !J Ik" . , PAGE 27 F j.~ ,~. '-'- ...~ 1 B DRAFT ORDINANCE NO, 99- ~, August 18, 1999 -..- ...-.- DRAFT ~ Pursuant to Section 22- 7( c), the city, as the applicant, shall use the same process to determine if the permit shall be revoked as it used to grant the permit. Section 15. Section 22-1473 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22-1473. When public improvements must be installed. (a) The applicant shall provide the improvements required by this article if the applicant engages in any activity which requires a development permit, except for the following: (I) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this article if the proposed improvements in any 12-month period do not exceed 25 percent of the assessed or appraised value (based on an MAl appraisal provided by the applicant) of all structures on the subject property, whichever is greater. (2) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this article if, within the immediately preceding four years, public improvements were installed as part of any subdivision or discretionary land use approval under this or any prior zoning code. (3) The applicant need not comply with the provisions of this article if the proposal is to locate a Personal Wireless Services Facility (PWSF) on the subject property. (b) Right-of-way adjacent to and within subdivision and short subdivisions must be dedicated and improved consistent with the requirements of this article, unless different requirements are imposed by the city as part of the subdivision or short subdivision approval. Section 16. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity or unconstitutionality of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not effect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 17. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1999. DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- EX~=~~C" , PAGE 28 Pß\'=~ ~=... Z 8 £3 -z.î,,_- August 18, 1999 DRAFT APPROVED: RON GINTZ, MAYOR ATTEST: N. CRISTINE GREEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: LONDI K. LINDELL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: E;r~=?Rr '"~ 8 PhGL_g.î,_,. 29 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 99- ,PAGE 29 August 18, 1999 c SUMMARY Commissioners present: Robert Vaughan (Chair), Karen Kirkpatrick, William Drake, Hope Elder, Eric Faison, John Caulfield, and Ed Soule. Commissioners absent: None. Alternative Commissioners present: None. Staff present: Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Contract Associate Planner Tim McHarg, and Administrative Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Vaughan called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. ApPROVAL OF MINUTES None. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADMINISTRATIVE REpORT None. COMMISSION BUSINESS- Personal Wireless Service Facilities Code Amendments The Public Hearing was opened at 7:03 p.m. Commission Kirkpatrick excused herself from the Public Hearing due to the appearance of a conflict of interest. Mr. McHarg gave the staff report. The impetus for the amendments were changing technology and the need to make an unwieldy code section more user friendly. The proposed changes are needed to deal with mobile PWSF's, implement an interpretation made by the Community Development Services Director, create a process for facilities in the public right-of-way, and clean up the charts and text. The proposed changes consist of: I) adding three definitions; 2) changes to the use zone charts; 3) text changes. Discussion was held on Automated Meter Readers (AMR). The staff explained what it is and proposed a change to 22-966( c)( 5), "... greater than two feet in height" is to be added after the words, "... other antennas." The Public Testimony was opened at 7:34 p.m. Pamela Krueger, Perkins Coie, 411 - 108th Ave NE, Ste 1800, Bellevue, W A 98004 - She is representing Puget Sound Energy. She provided the commission with a letter and back-up documentation about AMR' s. Most of her testimony came directly from her letter. She wanted to make clear that an AMR is different from a PWSF in that it is solely for the collection of data for use by the company. She is asking that a clear exemption from PWSF's be made. She Planning Commission July 21, 1999 EXH~[r- PAGE ,;J. c '--- -f2- - explained that there are three parts to an AMR system: the device to modify the meter; a pole top device for the initial data collection; and a collection device that gathers data from several poll devices. As proposed, the code will exempt the first two parts of the system, with the third required to go through a Process I. This makes it difficult for PSE to get their system up and running. She requested that all three parts of the AMR system be exempt. Two concerns PSE has with the Process I is that it expires in 10 years and requires collocation, which would not work with their technology. Further discussion was held on the AMR issue. Staff concedes that further study is needed. In the interim, AMR's are similar to PWSF's and should be so regulated. Brian Johnson, Voice Stream Wireless, 19307 North Creek Parkway, #101, Bothell, W A 98011- He spoke on the placement ofPWSF's on structures in the public right-of-way. Public utilities are beginning to require a 15 foot height distance between their transmission lines and PWSF's. He requested that PWSF's be allowed to exceed the 15 foot requirement in such cases. Lisa Verner, Commercial Development Solutions, PO Box 70372, Seattle, WA 98107- She is representing AT&T. She provided the commission a letter with a series of recommendations and went over each one. She asked from what did the city base the cabinet size? The size is too small. Staff replied that the cabinet sized is based on the Traffic Division's equipment box size which is based on the functional impacts to the right-of-way. She also expressed concern that only one PWSF may be located on an existing structure in the right-of-way. Staff replied that this is to avoid visual clutter. Josh Lonn, 120 Lakeside Ave, Ste 310, Seattle, W A 98122 - He represents Airtouch. He stated that he agrees with previous testimony. The 48 square foot limitation outside the right- of-way is a serious limitation. The restriction to one PWSF in the right-of-way is inconsistent with the city's policy of collocation. The Public Testimony was closed at 8:50 p.m. The commission discussed the need to reevaluate the equipment cabinet size, AMR's, and other issues raised in the public testimony. It was m/s/c to continue the public hearing to Wednesday, August 18, 1999. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADJOURN It was m/s/c to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m. K ICOMMON ADIPLANCOMI19991072I99SWPD SUMMARY Commissioners present: Robert Vaughan (Chair), Karen Kirkpatrick, Hope Elder, Eric Faison, John Caulfield, and Ed Soule. Commissioners absent: William Drake. Alternative Commissioners present: None. Staff present: Deputy Director of Public Works Ken Miller, Traffic Engineer Rick Perez, Senior Planner Margaret Clark, Contract Associate Planner Tim McHarg, and Admin Assistant E. Tina Piety. Chair Vaughan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ApPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of June 2, 1999 were approved. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADMINISTRATIVE REpORT Mr. Miller and Mr. Perez gave a presentation of the various street projects planned (and under construction) throughout the city. These include: Pacific Highway South, South 320th and Pacific Highway South intersection, BP A Trail Phase III, Sound Transit Center, and other projects. COMMISSION BUSINESS- Personal Wireless Service Facilities Code Amendments - Continued The Public Hearing reconvened at 8:10 p.m. Commission Kirkpatrick excused herselffrom the Public Hearing due to the appearance of a conflict of interest. The Public Testimony was opened at 8: 12 p.m. Lisa Verner, Commercial Development Solutions, PO Box 70372, Seattle, W A 98107- She represents AT&T. She requested that public facilities in right-of-ways (ROW) be number 3 on the priority list and that collocation be allowed. The ROW is the appropriate place for infrastructure, which is what PWSF's are. She requested that the word "appropriate" be deleted. The staff definition (a principal arterial, minor or collector street) is not clear. She requested that the one-year limitation be deleted and that PWSF's be allowed to locate in the setback area in order to take advantage of existing vegetation for screening on all four sides. She requested that the use zone charts be amended to allow monopoles in residential areas under Process IV. Not allowing them could prevent providing service to the entire city. Josh Lonn, 120 Lakeside Ave, Ste 310, Seattle, WA 98122 - He represents Airtouch. He thanked the staff for their hard work and stated that he agrees with Lisa. Why should equipment be undergrounded? The equipment for undergrounding is not available. Planning Commission August 18, 1999 EX.HRr- PAGE.3-~, - C -$- 2 Brian Johnson, Voice Stream Wireless, 19307 N Creek Pkwy, #101, Bothel, WA 98011- He also thanked the staff for their work. He requested that the process be lowered to a Process I when locating on an existing structure in the ROW in residential zones. The Public Testimony was closed at 8:30 p.m. Mr. McHarg gave the staff presentation. He summarized the significant changes. Additional changes were distributed. He went over the standards for equipment enclosures. The city has developed a hierarchy for the placement of equipment enclosures. The size for equipment enclosures in the ROW is the one approved by the Public Works Department. He stated that the regulation for temporary PWSF's has been changed to allow all providers on a site to locate a temporary PWSF, on-site, for up to 30 days. The city wants to encourage location of PWSF's on private property rather than the ROW, hence the lower priority on the location hierarchy. In addition, it is felt that ROW's are intended to accommodate items of a linear nature, such as conduits; PWSF's are not linear in nature. Mr. McHarg remarked that the staff believes the term "appropriate" is self-referential. The commission disagrees and requested staff to add a sentence that clearly defines "appropriate." Mr. McHarg went on to say that without the one-year limitation, the attempt could be made to circumvent the height restriction. PWSF's are not allowed in the setback in order to screen them from the ROW. Allowing them in the setback could decrease the amount of vegetation and could make maintenance access problematic. Allowing PWSF's in residential zones would be a significant policy change for the city. On the priority list, #6 allows location in non-priority zones in order to ensure that service would be provided to all areas of the city. Lowering the process to a Process I would also be a significant policy change for the city. Process III requires public notification, which is not required in Process I. Mr. McHarg commented that there is a response in the staff report to the issue of Automated Meter Readers. The pole-top units will be exempt, but the data collection units will have to go through a Process III (staff expects that three to four data collection units will cover the city). It was m/s/c (no nays) to send the recommendation forward to the City Council with the addition of a sentence clearly defining the word "appropriate." The Public Hearing was closed at 8:57 p.m. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Commissioner Caulfield requested a presentation from Parks on the capital facilities. It was suggested that a formal presentation be given about every other meeting from the different city departments on issues of interest to the commission. Ms. Clark gave a presentation of current planning projects. AUDIENCE COMMENT None. ADJOURN It was m/s/c to adjourn the meeting at 9: 15 p.m. K\COMMONADIPLANCOM\1999\O81899S WPD PWSF FWCC Amendment Distribution List Outside Agencies/Organizations 1. Airtouch Cellular Josh Loon The Walter Group 120 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 310 Seattle, W A 98122 7. Brian Johnson Voice Stream Wireless 3650 - 131 st Avenue SE, #400 Bellevue, W A 98006 2. Ross Baker AT&T Wireless 617 Eastlake Avenue East Seattle, W A 98109 8. Brian Pollom Puget Sound Energy PO Box 90868 Bellevue, W A 98009-0868 9. Pamela Krueger Perkins Coie LLP 411 - 108th Avenue NE, Suite 1800 Bellevue, W A 98004-5584 3. Kate Stephens GTE Wireless 2445 - 140th Avenue NE, Suite 202 Bellevue, W A 98005 4. Mary Murdoch Nextel Communications 1750 - I 12th Avenue NE, Suite C-1O0 Bellevue, W A 98004 10. Lisa Verner, AICP Commercial Design Solutions PO Box 70372 Seattle, W A 98107 5. Donald Bordenave Sprint PCS 4683 Chabot Drive, Suite 100 Pleasanton, CA 94588 II. Gregory J. McCormick, AICP Odelia Pacific 1201 - 3rd Avenue, Suite 320 Seattle, W A 98101 6. Kelly Campbell US West Wireless 450 - Ii0th Avenue NE, Room 211 Bellevue, W A 98004 1:\DOCUMENlìTelecomlDistribution2 Listdoc EXH~~~m- :v PAGE.-L -- I ...~~TI":Nç..~~:!'.~.;.....J~.~~~ry..~.t.~.999.......................................J:!'.~M.~J II - (~) ............................,... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM .. . .~~~ç .!.;........~ ~~ ~~ ...~ . . .~ ~~.~ ~~ ~.~.~ ~ .. .ç,. ~ ~.~~~~ ~ ~.~... ~ p p ~ ~~ ~.~.~ ~~. . J ~.~P ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t .. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ .......................................................,..."...............,....................",....................................,................................................................ ........................................... ATTACHMENTS: Council Committee 12/13/99 meeting summary; memo from City Clerk Chris Green dated 12/17/99; and resignation from Dean McColgan dated 12/10/99. ..........................................................,..................................................................................................,......................,.................. ............................................. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: See Parks & Recreation Commission comments included with the 12/13/99 Council Committee's summary attached hereto. .............................................................................................................,........................,....................,.................""'."........'.'.'.'."."'. ..'.'.'.........."".........,.,....... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The consensus of the committee was to recommend the appointment of Dave Armstrong to fill the unexpired term of Dean McColgan...said term expires 4/30/00. .........................................................",......................,..............................,............'..........".."....................'...."."............,.",.",.....""""... ......,.,.,........"............. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: The Council will move appointment of Dave Armstrong to fill the unexpired term of Dean McColgan, obtain a second and vote on their recommendation. The City Clerk is directed to arrange for introduction and presentation of appointment certificate for the commission replacement at the January 18 regular meeting. .........................................,.........................,.............................................................................................................,.........,.....,."",. ...,......"............................... APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CCCOVER.5/24194 City of Federal Way City Council PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Monday, December 13, 1999 5:30 p.m. City Hall Mt. Baker Conference Room SUMMARY In attendance: Council Committee members Jack Dovey, Linda Kochmar and Jeanne Burbidge; David Moseley, City Manager; Derek Matheson, Assistant to the City Manager; Jennifer Schroder, Director of Parks Recreation and Cultural Services; David Wilbrecht, Deputy Director of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services; Pat Richardson, Assistant City Attorney; Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager; Andy Hwang, Police Commander; Jon Jainga, Park Planning & Development Manager; Kurt Reuter, Athletics & Specialized Services Manager; Sandra Warter, Municipal Court Administrator; Rick Perez, Traffic Engineer; Sue Floyd, Administrative Assistant Guests: Dini Duclos, David Kaplan, Barbara Reid, Bob Kellogg, Justine and Russell Mentink, Greg Epperson Committee Chair Jack Dovey called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. PUBLIC FORUM None. / COMMISSION COMMENTS Dini Duclos, Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission, reported that she has received a letter of resignation from Dean McColgan, Council member-elect, and recommended to the committee that alternate commission member Dave Armstrong be appointed to serve the remainder of Mr. McColgan's term. Mr. Armstrong has been very active in commission activities, APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 22. 1999 SUMMARY JEANNE BURBIDGE MOVED, LINDA KOCHMAR SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 22,1999 MINUTES. MOTION PASSED. BUSINESS ITEMS MONICIP AL COURT RESOLUTION Pursuant to Ordinance No. 99-339, the Federal Way Municipal Court was created and will be operational on January 1,2000. One aspect of the operation includes arraignment proceedings. The Municipal Court intends to conduct arraignments for suspects held in custody by video. The video arraignment equipment and arrangements will not be operational until approximately March 2000. The Municipal Court must conduct all arraignments in person until that time, The King County District Court has offered that, in the interim, the Municipal Court may use a room at the Kent Regional Justice Center for in-custody arraignments at no additional cost over what the City currently pays for daily jail maintenance fees. Although specific circumstances for the proposed resolution address in-custody arraignments, there may be a situation in the interim when Kent Regional Justice Center is not available and another King County District Court must be used. The proposed resolution authorizes court proceedings within King County as necessary. LINDA KOCHMAR MOVED, JEANNE BURBIDGE SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION TO ALLOW MUNICIPAL COURT oi CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MDE MORAND UM TO: Council members & Council members- Elect FROM: Chris Green, City Clerk r\ H December 17, 1999 '-" (j DATE: SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Commissioner Resignation Attached is the resignation from Council member-Elect Dean McColgan from the Parks & Recreation Commission. During the last appointment process the following three alternates were named: Mike Lane (lit alternate); Dave Armstrong (2nd alternate); and C.T. Purdom (3M alternate). City staff advised that Mike Lane has declined a commission appointment and wishes to remain an alternate at this time. In light of the fact that alternate Dave Armstrong has continuously participated in commission activities, Jack Dovey, Chair of the Parks/Recreation/Human ServiceslPublic Safety Committee, is recommending Dave Armstrong's appointment to fill the unexpired term of Dean McColgan. Unless I hear something to the contrary, I will schedule the appointment recommendation for the January 4, 2000 regular meeting.. ..many thanks! c: David H. Moseley, City Manager Derek Matheson, Assistant to City Manager Jenny Schroder, ParkslRecreation Director Sue Floyd, Admin Asst II MENOce To: Dini Duclos, Chair - Parks and Recreation Commission Jenny Schroder, Director - Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services December 1O, 1999 From: Dean McColgan Parks and Recreation Commissioner Please accept my resignation from the Parks and Recreation Commission effective December 13, 1999 so that I may concentrate on my new duties as Federal Way City Councilmember-ELect. Sincerely, , ~ ' 1, /) I 7/jv/'- // c....-/ " / ~~ /L Lb all#1- ean McColgan Federal Way City Councilmember-Elect cc: Chris Green, City Clerk MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 ITEM# ..:YLL ~) ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM . ...f?! ~ Ç."!.L... X ~ . ~ ~ f!. !!...q ~ t ~P. P..~.!~ f t!.!:.. ~ ~~ §.~~~':!. - ~ ~!!:~ Ç. ~~!!:I.. P! ~~t!.!.'... ~ ~.1?! ~Ç... ~ t!. ~ ... . .. ... . ... .. .. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: _X_CONSENT _ORDINANCE _BUSINESS _HEARING FYI _X_RESOLUTION _STAFF REPORT _PROCLAMATION _STUDY SESSION _OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ...... ........................ ..................... ................................. .................... .......... ..... ........... ........................................................ .................. .. ......... ..... ........................ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum w/attachments to the December 15, 1999 meeting of the Finance/Economic DevelopmentlRegionai Affairs Committee (FEDRAC) .................. ................................. ..P.E~..~~~g,!~!~ g, ~..~.~..~~~P.!. Qr.~!~............... .................... .. .................................. ................... ...... ................... SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: Five grants totaling $195,914 are available in 2000 and continuing into 2001 to support waste reduction and recycling programs for area residents and businesses. Public Works Department staff filed applications and scopes of work to reserve the available grant funds. The grants are consistent with those awarded in prior years. Attachment J to the Committee Memorandum contains brief descriptions of each grant and its associated projects; Attachment 2 provides a summary of grant- funded programs which served the Federal Way community in 1999. Attached is a draft Resolution to accept the 2000/2001 grant funds and authorize the City to enter into ...~8.~~~~ ~~~.~. ~!~. !~~ .~~!~g. ~g.~~.~! ~~:................................................................................................ """"""""""""""""""""""""'" ......... CITY COUNCn. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its December 15, 1999 meeting, the Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee approved forwarding the following recommendations to the January 4,2000 City Council meeting: 1. Approve the 2000/2001grant applications and programs; 2. Prepare the attached draft resolution; ..}:... ... ~~~.~ g, ~~. .~~~.~~g.. ~~.~.. ~8r.~~~~.~!~ .~!.~. .!~~. .8!..~~!. . ~~.~E~~~. .~Y.. .~~~ P'!~~g. !~.~. .~~~~~ ~~. ~~~.~ ~.!~.~.~:... """" .... .... ... . ..ç!!y'.. ~N ~ Q ~ !!..~.ç9..~ ~ ~!! Q N ~.... ~P.P.!~ Y. ~. .!~~.. ç,g ~~ ~.! ..ç~ ~~~~. r~~ ~ ~.~ ~~ !~g ~:.... . . ....... .......... APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCn. PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: K: \COUNCIL \AGDBILLS\2000\grantsOO. swr COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # _APPROVED DENIED T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION Item CITY OF FEDERAL WAY -- CITY COUNCIL FINANCE/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Date: December 7, 1999 Cary M. Roe, Public Works Director ~ Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste & Recycling CoordinatorQ .~~ From: Subject: Solid Waste and Recycling Division 2000/2001Grant Approvals Executive Summary: Five grants totaling $195,914 are available in 2000/200 I to support waste reduction and recycling programs for area residents and businesses. Public Works Department staff has already filed applications and scopes of work to reserve the available grant funds. This memorandum and its attachments summarize these grant projects. The Committee is requested to review these grants and forward this item for adoption by the City Council. Discussion: The 2000/200 I grants are consistent with grants accepted in prior years. Attachment 1 contains brief descriptions of each grant, its associated source and amount. Attachment 2 provides a summary of grant-funded programs which served the Federal Way community in 1999. As in prior years, the City Council is asked to adopt a resolution to accept the grant projects and funds, and provide authority to enter into agreements with grant agencies. Recommendation for Committee: 1. Approve the 2000/2001 Solid Waste and Recycling Division grant applications and programs; 2. Direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution for acceptance of these grants from the various agencies; " .). Forward this item to the January 4, 2000 City Council meeting consent agenda with a recommendation for adoption of the appropriate Resolution. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Committee Chair: Mary Gates Committee Member: Jeanne Burbidge 7?J(f~ Committee Member: Linda Kocll1nar , I " "" -I/í -\ '-?:~-<---' '/~) tiL", .I~'í L- ~ ,",,7C::-CC'-'-,- " -<-<-. , ,~ '~ "', ,^ ' -, ' "/ ,: B-1 Attachment 1 2000/2001 SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATIONS AND PROGRAMS 1. 2000-2001 DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY COORDINATED PREVENTION (CPG) GRANT The grant focuses on five projects: Home Compost Bin Distribution, Regional Yard Waste Reduction Promotion Project (continuation), Electronics Recycling Project, Waste Reduction and Recycling Options Promotion (which includes production of the annual "Recycling Options" flyer), and Integrated Pest Management outreach. This grant totals $86,538 over two years, and provides 60% funding, with a 40% match requirement. The majority of the match for the CPG projects will be provided by the WR/R Grant, with the balance coming ftom the LHWMP grant. 2. 2000/2001 KING COUNTY "WASTE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING" PROGRAM GRANT Trus new grant replaces funding provided by the 1996-1999 grant of the same name. The 2000/2001 King County Waste Reduction and Recycling (WR/R) Grant focuses on the same projects outlined above for the CPG grant. This grant totals $41,616 in 2000. The term of this grant is anticipated to extend into 2001, with potential for an additional funding allocation for 2001. 3. 2000 KING COUNTY "CITY OPTIONAL PROGRAM" (BUSINESS RECYCLING PROGRAM) The 2000 King County "City Optional Program" Business Recycling Program Grant allocates $12,182.00 with no match requirement. This grant will focus on waste reduction and recycling outreach to businesses through "on-request" outreach and promotion of model- business recycling practices. 4. 2000 KING COUNTY "CITY OPTIONAL PROGRAM" (RECYCLING EVENTS) The 2000 King County "City Optional Program" Special Recycling Collection Event Grant allocates $13,608.00 with no match requirement. This funding will cover costs for operating two special recycling collection events in Federal Way during 2000 (scheduled for spring and fall). These events will provide residents with a convenient method to recycle a wide variety of recyclable materials that are not normally collected at curbside, 5. 2000 LOCAL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GRANT The Seattle-King County Department of Public Health 2000 Local Hazardous Waste Management Program (LHWMP) Grant allocates $41,970.00 with no match requirement. This grant will primarily supplement funding for the Special Recycling Events and Integrated Pest Management outreach, and also support the Regional Yard Waste Reduction Promotion Project. i3-;L Attachment 2 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Solid Waste & Recycling Division 1999 Grant Progress Report L Special Recycling Events Funded by: King County Solid Waste Division "City Optional Program - Recycling Events" Grant, and King County "Local Hazardous Waste Management Program" Grant. Two Special Recycling Collection Events were held: Spring (May 15) which attracted 400 participants, and Fall (September 11) which attracted 3 86 participants. Both events were he~d at the South Federal Way Park and Ride. The type and tonnage of materials collected and recycled is . shown in the following table. SPRING 99 FALL 99 TYPE OF MATERIALS TONS TONS Appliances 5.44 8.31 AutomobilelMarine Batteries 1.62 1.69 Used Motor OiVMixed Petroleum Products 3.00 2.96 Antifreeze .79 1.00 Tires 2.23 2.61 Used Oil Filters .22 .44 Textiles and Reusable Household Goods 1.87 1.87 Scrap Wood! 46.63 32.14 Yard Debris TOTAL TONS 61.8 51.0 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS 400 386 II. Business Recycling Program Funded by: King County Solid Waste Division "City Optional Program -- Business Recycling Program" Grant. Project Activities through November 1999 for the City of Federal Way's Business Recycling Program are summarized below. City staff completed the following activities, without the use of an outside consultant as had been used in prior years. A. Phone Book Advertisement City staff coordinated with King County on the development of a "Yellow Pages" advertisement in the U.S. West Directory. As a result of this advertisement, 23 businesses contacted the City requesting assistance with recycling issues. The advertisement also generated numerous calls from residents seeking recycling options. }3-3 B. "On-Call" Outreach A total of 75 businesses received "on-call" outreach. These businesses were provided with information, recycling containers, and guidance on how to start or maintain waste reduction and recycling programs, as appropriate. c. Business Recycling Information Flyer A flyer promoting waste reduction and recycling practices was produced in late 1999. The flyer also highlights a new inexpensive option for cardboard recycling offered by the franchised hauler. This flyer will be distributed to 1400 businesses at year end. D. Database Support, Reporting and Tracking System All assistance, outreach and follow-up activities were recorded into the Grantor Agency's County-wide tracking system. ID. 1999 Multi-Family Recycling Program Funded by: The King County Solid Waste Division - Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant, and the Department of Ecology - Coordinated Prevention Grant and Referenda 26/39 Grant. B. This project focuses on boosting recycling rates for the multi-family residential sector. A. Program Implementation Through 1998, proposals which add or expand the level of recycling service were prepared and reviewed with all Multi-family property managers in Federal Way. During 1999, those proposals were actively followed up with the remaining complexes which had yet to make a decision on program implementation. Promotional Materials Development In addition to the wide array of promotional materials that were developed as part of the earlier phase of this project, specific materials were developed to assist each complex in overcoming their specific program implementation challenges. C. Equipment Recycling Containers (Bags) The durable, washable woven-plastic recycling bags continue to be distributed to complexes. Each is printed with instructions, as well as a list of what to recycle and discard. These bags require very little space and are considerably less expensive than the three-bin system used in single-family dwellings. Lid Chutes Staff worked with the tTanchised hauler to modify recycling dumpsters to make them more "recycling mendlylt by installing locking lids with specialized chutes and slots for recycling cardboard. These modifications are designed to reduce contamination and deter illegal dumpers. This equipment was procured in 1997. In 2000, excess unused equipment may be made available for use in other recycling programs, notably office paper recycling programs at area businesses, or similar multi-family recycling programs offered in unincorporated King County. ß-Lj D. Outreach Program City staff continued implementation of the comprehensive outreach program at participating complexes, including: . Developing a customized "Recycling Kick-Off Announcement" letter printed on bright paper and distributed to each resident a few days prior to program implementation, along with a refiigerator magnet printed with recycling basics. This letter encourages participation in the recycling program directly fÌ'om the complex managers (as opposed to relying only on the City's brochure) and helps to announce the program kick-off date and recruit volunteers. . Distribution of the recycling bags, educational brochures, and translations of the brochure into eight languages to specified residents, as appropriate. . Provision of durable signs posted near recycling dumpsters instructing residents how to recycle; stickers with similar infonnation were affixed to recycling containers prior to delivery. City staff continues to regularly follow-up with managers following program implementation in order to prompt the highest diversion levels possible. E. Expected Diversion ofRecyclables From Multi-Family Complexes The implementation/expansion of recycling services at 53 complexes (as of November 1999) will result in a total diversion of3,515 cubic yards of recyclable material each year. IV. Household Hazardous Waste Education Funded by: King County "Local Hazardous Waste Management Program" (LHWMP) Grant. Staff worked with LHWMP to develop a survey of County residents to determine a baseline level of awareness about pesticide use reduction strategies (known as "Integrated Pest Management," or IPM). This survey will be conducted in late 1999 and early 2000. Its results will help to guide this ongoing project in 2000. The anticipated outcome is a reduction in the generation of waste fuel which then requires disposal as hazardous waste. In addition to a residential IPM focus, City operations will also be reviewed in 2000 to determine how to enact potential improvement in the City's IPM program. This will aid in enabling the City to respond to the listing of salmonids as endangered species. V. Backyard Compost Bin Distribution to Federal Way Residents Funded by: The King County Solid Waste Division - Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant, and the Department of Ecology - Coordinated Prevention Grant An RFP process resulted in retaining RPM, Inc. of Redmond, W A to provide a compost bin "truckload sale" for Federal Way residents. A direct-mail piece was developed and sent to all single- family residents to promote the event. 840 bins were distributed during the six-hour event held June 13, 1998, with a remaining 103 bins reserved for distribution on an as-requested basis. The availability of the reserved bins is promoted via the "options" brochure, the City's e-mail address, the City's new public access channel bulletin board, and during community events. Through September 1999, 69 of the remaining bins were distributed for a total of909 bins distributed during 1998-1999. !3 --5 VI. Waste Reduction & Recycling Options Brochure Funded by: Department of Ecology Coordinated Prevention Grant This brochure informs Federal Way residents of the 1999-2000 winter yard waste service schedule, while increasing awareness of other available waste reduction, recycling, disposal and household hazardous waste options. Staff completed revisions of the Options for Recycling and Disposal brochure for the latest version, and the City's graphics coordinator completed the layout. More than 19,000 brochures were distributed. vn. Recycling Program Community Outreach and Grant Reporting Administration Funded by: Department of Ecology - Coordinated Prevention Grant, and the SW&R Fund (106) City staff provided information to residents interested in recycling and hazardous materials disposal options on an ongoing basis. A display featuring information on waste reduction and recycling and hazardous waste prevention was set up and staffed at the community events listed below. The display was updated regularly and promotional items such as refillable mugs, automobile litter bags made in part with recycled plastic, and recycled-content writing pens were distributed. These grant- funded items serve to create interest in the information available at the display booth. ~ Federal Way Chamber of Commerce-Business Trade Show at the SeaTac Mall. Federal Way Family Fest Steel Lake Park at Steel Lake Park. Federal Way Community Safety Fair at the SeaTac Mall. International Community Service Expo at the SeaTac Mall. ~ ~ ~ VIII. Yard Waste Reduction (a.k.a. 'Grasscycling') Promotion Campaign and Mower Sales Funded by: The King County Solid Waste Division - Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant, and the Department of Ecology - Coordinated Prevention Grant Grant funds also supported the regional Grasscycling campaign which culminated in March 1999. The campaign resulted in the subsidized sale of mulching lawnmowers and the recycling of old gas mowers in Puget Sound. The events were well received, and again received a lot of media attention -- 22 stories on television alone. Overall, sales were down about 25% from 1998, with a total of 3,326 mowers sold (vs. 4,600 in 1998). A summary of the four 1999 events follows: Mower Type GRASSCYCLING CAMPAIGN 1999 Electric Mulchin Mower Sales b Event Location Northgate Tacoma Lake Paine Field Sammamish TOTAL 209 50 280 48 514 86 247 43 (inct. 30 rain checks 1,250 227 Total number of used gas mowers recycled 3,000 (estimated) K:\FEDC\ 1999\grantsOO.wpd ß-{p DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF MONIES AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS TO ACCEPT FUNDS FROM VARIOUS STATE AND COUNTY SOURCES FOR ESTABLISHING PROJECTS WITHIN THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING FUND. WHEREAS, cities are charged with providing and maintaining public projects necessary to maintain and improve the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the financial resources of cities to provide these necessary service and improvements are limited; and WHEREAS, various state and county sources have special funds available to supplement city projects, which are awarded on a population allocation and project specific basis; and WHEREAS, the City staff has aggressively pursued ! obtaining these funds in order to maximize the local public benefits of these funds; and WHEREAS, the grants identified herein will net the City of Federal Way a total of One-Hundred Ninety-five Thousand Nine Hundred fourteen Dollars and No/lOa ($195,914.00); and Res. # , Page 1 WHEREAS, the City commits to accountability by measuring and quantifying the results of the funded programs; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Sect ion 1. Agreements Authorized. For all projects identified in Column 1 of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, the City Manager or his or designated representative is authorized and directed t_o develop scopes of work and execute such agreements with the agencies identified in Column 2 of Exhibit A as are necessary to accept the grant monies identified in Column 3 of Exhibit A. Section 2. Receipt of Funds Authorized. The City Manager or his or her designee is hereby authorized to receive the grant monies identified in Column 3 of Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 3. Creation of Solid Waste Proiect Grant Funds Authorized. At the time of execution o~ each / agreement and acceptance of the grant funds specific to that agreement, separate projects shall be established within the Solid Waste and Recycling Fund, into which monies specific to that grant project shall be deposited. Res. # / Page 2 Section 4. Manaqer Shall Administer Funds. The City Manager or his or her designated representative shall have responsibility for the administration of the grant monies received. Section 5. Identification of Source Funds. The approximate amounts and anticipated sources of revenue for the grant fund projects are identified in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be ipvalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Sect ion 7. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 8. Effective Date. Thi~ resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. Res. # , Page 3 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this day of , 1999. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, RONALD L. GINTZ ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: LONDI K. LINDELL, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. K:\RESO\PWGRANT.99 I Res. # , Page 4 Exhibit A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION - YEAR 2000 GRANT PROJECTS AND AMOUNTS Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 GRANT /PROJECT SOURCE GRANT MA TCH TERM AMOUNT REQUIRED 2000/200 I Coordinated Prevention Grant Department of Ecology $86,538 $57,692 1/1/00 to 1213 1/01 For Home Compost Bin Distribution, Regional Yard Waste Reduction Promotion Project, Electronics Recycling Project, Waste Reduction and ... Recycling Options Promotion, and Integrated Pest Management Education Outreach 2000/2001 Waste Reduction and Recycling Program Grant King County Solid Waste $41,616 $0 1/1 /00 to 12/3 1/00 Home Compost Bin Distribution, Regional Yard Waste Reduction Division (term may extend Promotion Project, Electronics Recycling Project, Waste Reduction and into2001) Recycling Options Promotion, and Integrated Pest Management Education . Outreach 2000 City Optional Program -- Business Recycling Program King County Solid Waste $12,182 $0 1/1/00 to 12/31/00 Grant Division (for business recycling outreach including "on-call" outreach, and Greel.1 Works membership promotion) 2000 City Optional Program -- Special Recycling Events Grant King County Solid Waste $13,608 $0 1/1/00 to 12/31/00 (for operating two Special Recycling Events) Division 2000 Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Grant King County Local $41,970 $0 1/1/00 to 12/3 1/00 (for operating two Special Recycling Events, and support of Regional Waste Hazardous Waste Reduction Promotion Project) Management Program Total $195,914 C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\¡mI. T AB.OO. wpd MEETING DATE: January 4,2000 ITEM# -y / ( ~-) ........,.........................................,............................................................................................................................................,....... ............................................................ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ...~y'~~~ç.'!.;.. ?,g,g,g..~~..çgg~p~~~.~ ~g.~.. ç~ ~!!~~.!~.f~.~. §.~ry~,~~.~. ~F~.g!.~~..g~.~~ ~,~ ~~ ~.~~~g.~,~................................................... CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ....................................................................................................,.........................,.......,..,......................,...................................... ............................................................ . ...A IIA ç ~~~ ~.T~. ; . . ç ~ ~~ ~.~~.. ~~. ~ ~.!~ ~.~ ..~~,!~ ~ ~ f <? !:"!? A~! ~~ .P..~~ ~~ !? ~!.. ? ! .. .~ .?? ?; ..?,g,g.Q.. g ~.C? ~ ~ ~~~. ~ ~~g ~.~. .... . . ... .. .. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Contracts for Services program is an arts funding program for local not-for-profit arts organizations. The Arts Commission leverages funding they receive by contracting with arts organizations to provide cultural programs and services for the community. Each year, the Arts Commission develops funding guidelines and an application and then reviews the requests and makes recommendations to City Council. Recommended funding levels are based on the 2000 Arts Commission ...þ.~gg~!..~g~~.~~~9.~:.......,..,.................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On December 15, 1999, the Finance/Economic Development & Regional Affairs Council Committee approved the Arts Commission's . ..~.~~g.~ ~~~~!.~ 9. ~~..f~.~ .fl!.~~~.~g..!.~,~} .~.~.~.. çg.~.!!~~~ f ~!ß ~FY.,~ ~.~~..P.~~~~.................................................................. """""""""""'" . ...ç ~ IX.. ~~ A 9..¥..~. ~ .ç.Q M.~~ ~ P..A !.~ 9.. ~~.. A. PP!9. .Y. ~ , ç 9. ~~ ~. ~.~ ..ç.~ ~~.~ ~!,~~ . ~~~ 9. !!l.~.~~ ~~ ~~. ~.~.: . .. ..... .. ... .. , .. ... .. . ... .. .. . . APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUN~ PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Date: December 9, 1999 From: Mary Faber, Recreation and Cultural Services Manager Subject: 2000 Contract for Services Program Recommendations Back2round: The Contract for Services Program is arts funding program for local not for profit arts organizations, The Arts Commission leverages funding they receive by contracting with arts organizations to provide cultural programs and services for the community. Each year the Arts Commission develops funding guidelines and an application and then reviews the requests and makes recommendations to City Council. Enclosed is a summary of the requests for funding for 2000 and the Arts Commission recommendations. Recommended funding levels are based on the 2000 Arts Commission budget allocation, Committee Recommendation: Approve the Arts Commission's recommendations for funding the 1999 Contract for Services Program. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: è'! ~~C)it;)",;~~;f-'?:.£.(ð<:-~'¿, '( , hair .. ' . "cdmmittee Member .,..d G:\CLERk.ïCMTE.REC 3/11/96 ])-1 CITY OF FEDERA fA Y ARTS COMMISSION CONTRACT l'OR SERVICES 2000 RECOMDA TIONS Organization 2000 1999 1998 Recommend Allocation Allocation Funding Description ation Aria Dance Company 1,500 1,500 N/A Funding will cover the salary of a professional choreographer to work with the group for a Company Repertoire to be presented at Knutzen Family Theater in the SPring of 2000. Federal Way Chorale 3,500 3,000 3,500 Funding will cover the salaries of the professional performance accompanists comprising the chamber orchestra for the Spring and Winter 2000 concerts. Federal Way Community Council 3,500 3,000 4,000 Family Fest entertainers on all stages, as well as wandering entertainers, parade bands, and demonstrators (i.e. artists-in-action). Also seeking funding for the cost of equipment and technical support reauired by performers. Center Stage Theatre Arts 10,500 N/A N/A Funding will off-set reduced ticket prices offered to seniors and students from local High Conservatory School and Jr. High School drama departments, also help cover fees of contracted Actors, Directors, Designers and Technical Staff. Federal Way Symphony 10,150 14,000 15,000 Funds will support the production of the Sunday Matinee series and cover all or part of the orchestra musicians' fees. Harmony Kings N/A 500 N/A Funds used to employ choral director and fund coaching for competition, specifically choreolmlohv and technique. Jet Cities Chorus 3,000 1,000 1,700 Funding will cover expenses involved with paying our guest artist and with the purchase of tickets to donate to the community. Puget Sound Musical Theatre 5,000 5,500 Funds will be used for the costs of the salaries of contracting the Director, Choreographer, 4,500 Music Director / Conductor, Light Designer and the Sound Designer. TOTALS 36,650 28,000 29,700 Arts Commission Recommendations : \AR TSCOM\PROGRAMS\CFSB UDG\AlIocatOO .doc 0/19/99 mlh 1) - c;2- MEETING DATE: January 4,2000 ITEM# .:1'l/ ~ ............................................................,................................................,..,........,............................................................................. ........................,................................... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ......................................................................,..................,.................................................................................,........................... ........................................................... SUBJECT: 2000 Arts Commission Work Plan CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ..................................................................................................................,.................................................................................,.. ...............,...............................,............ .. ..~ !.!.~ç !I..~~ ~,!.~.~.. ç ~ ~~ ~.~ ~. ~,~.~ ~.~~~.~. .~~.~A~ ~. .f<? ~ ß!:l.!.~~, P..~~~~ Þ ~T.. ~?, ~. ???;. .~ggg.. y!'g ~~..~ ~.~!1.,......",.....,........,....... SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Arts Commission held a retreat in November to develop the 2000 .. ..~~.~~..P ~.~?. ~ ~A~.~..~!:l.~ ..~~~P ~~ß. .þy.. ~~.~..~.~~ .~~.~~.~~A ~~ß~EÏ.PK ~~.~ ..P.~.~~~ ~~~. ~~.~~~!1.g :.......................,.......... ..... ................. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On December 15,1999, the Finance/Economic Development & Regional Affairs Council Committee approved the 2000 Arts ....çg~.~~.~~gP..~~~~.P'.~~:..........................,..........................................................................................................................................,..... ...........,................. .. .ç.r!x..~~.~ q~.~. ~ ç,.Q ~~~ ~.~.~!.~ 9..~:.. A.PP!gy.~..ç ~ ~!1.~}.~. .ç.<?~~.~ ~!.~~.. ~~.~? ~.~~~~.~~g.~.:............... .................. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNC~ PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # I:\COVERCC-5114/96 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Date: December 9, 1999 From: Mary Faber, Recreation and Cultural Services Manager Subject: 2000 Arts Commission Work Plan Back~round: The Arts Commission held a retreat in November to develop the 2000 Work Plan. The Work Plan was adopted by the Commission during the December Commission Meeting, A copy of 2000 Work Program is enclosed for review. Committee Recommendation: Approve the 2000 Arts Commission Work Plan. APPRO VAL OF CO MMITTEEREPORT: . ?!?' ~ /----... / ,~1 ' ".. ,¡::' ,/' /' ~~ ' ..'., ' ': """"X~W7~.L'I;Þl..({;yL.~<:., Committee Chair ' ,Cómmittee Member ,1 c4:ç~ =f;;:~l ~r~'-- Committee Member G:\CLERk.'\CMTE.REC 3/11/96 £-/ 1. E. City of Federal Way Arts Commission 2000 Work Plan Public Art Committee A. Maintain City Hall Exhibits and Knutzen Family Theatre Gallery 1. Schedule artists for both galleries for 2000. Timeline: Mists scheduled by Jan. 15, 2000 2. Develop a marketing piece that promotes the exhibits at both galleries. Timeline: January, 2000 3. Develop a marketing piece that promotes the exhibits at both galleries. Timeline: January, 2000 B. Serve in an advisory role with Metro Regional Transit Authority Public Art . 1. Review art proposals for Federal Way Projects. Timeline: Tentatively scheduled for January, 2000. 2. Assist Metro Transit with any public involvement planned for the project. Timeline: On-going C. Implementation of 2% for Art and Public Art Projects at Celebration Park. 1. Review artist submittals and authorize final design. Timeline: Final design submitted to FEDRAC in February, 2000. 2. Host a dedication ceremony for the artwork installation. Timeline: Dedication ceremony planned for September, 2000. D. Develop art plans for upcoming 2% for Art Projects 1. Develop a timeline for public art involvement for the Skateboard Park. Timeline: Commission Review during March, 2000 meeting. 2. Consider opportunities for public art for BPA Phase III. Timeline: Review by Public M Committee by April, 2000. Develop a plan for a Sculpture Exhibit at Celebration Park. 1, Research other communities outdoor sculpture programs. Timeline: March, 2000 2. Schedule a retreat to develop an overall concept for the Exhibit. Time/lne: April, 2000 £' - c:z- F. 3. Develop preliminary budget and project outline and timeline. Tímeline: Present information at June Commission meeting. 4. Develop artist prospectus. Tímeline: October, 2000 Review Draft Public Art Policies and finalize. Tímeline: Policies submitted to FEDRAC by June for approval. 2. Cultural Relations Committee A. B. C. 3. Update informational Arts Commission brochure Tímeline: Print in February, 2000 Publish bi-annual newsletter: Tímeline: Spring-Summer Edition mailed in March, 2000 Fall/Winter Edition mailed in September, 2000 Attend Chamber meetings and bring promotional items for display. Tímeline: Monthly as scheduled. D. Sponsor a fundraising and grant writing seminar at KFT for non-profit arts organizations. Tímeline: April, 2000 E. Update the Arts Commission informational slide program and develop a compatible version for the City's web pages. Tímeline: July, 2000 F. Submit information for the cultural calendar page on a quarterly schedule. Tímeline: Quarterly to coincide with the production of the Recreation Brochure. Programs Committee A. Sponsor King County Performance Network Events at the Knutzen Family Theatre, Timeline: Seattle Baroque-January 21 Mojo Big Band-March 4 B. Host reception with Contract for Services Recipients and and City Council. Tímeline: March, 2000 C. Red, White and Blues Festival: 1. Review and develop new ideas for Artists in Action area. 2. Develop the idea of an integrated public art project at the event. Timeline: Artists selected and ideas finalized by March, 2000. £-3 2 4. D. 2001 Contract for Services Program. 1. Develop Update application guidelines. TImeHne: June, 2000 2. Publish new guidelines. TImeline: July, 2000 3. Review applications, make recommendations for funding to Commission. TImeline: Review applications in October, approve at Commission Meeting in October E. Continue involvement and funding support of the Summer Sounds on the Beach Concert Series. Timeline: Summer, 2000 Facilities Committee A. Continue to review/revise Knutzen Family Theatre Policies 1. Host F.W.C.P.A. and get feedback from user groups concerning the facility, policies and pricing TImeline: February, 2000 2. Develop policy for a reduced rental rates for local student recitals. Timeline: Have policy prepared for approval at February, 2000 meeting. B. Continue to educate and promote the facility to the user groups/develop an advocacy role in the community. TImeHne: On-going!! C. Assist City staff with storage needs of piano and public event celebrating the addition of the concert grand piano. 1. Review storage piano options and pricing. Timeline: February, 2000 Committee Meeting 2. Host a free or low cost public event featuring piano music. TimeHne: First quarter, 2000 D. Develop on-going advocacy with the Council on facility needs. 1. Update F.E.D.RA. Committee on facility schedules and needs. 2. Invite Council members to attend Commission and Committee Timeline: Present facilffy usage information, 2000 schedule at the February, 2000 FEDRAC Committee. E. Host a piano concert at Knutzen Family Theatre, Timeline:Fa~ 2000 £,~ 3 5. Cultural Plan Update A small group of Arts Commissioners and members who served on the original Cultural Planning Committee will review the current plan, update and recommend a process for developing a new Cultural Plan. Funding is limited and the Focus Group will also consider funding sources as a part of their review. Timeline: Focus group review second quarter of 2000, updates and recommended process for Developing a new plan by September, 2000. k:\artscom\retwkpln.99 6-3 4 MEETING DATE: January 4,2000 ITEM# 3!If: Çj ) """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"""".........................................................""""""""""""""""""""""""""""............................,........ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ..................................,..,..............,.,...........,.,..........",..............,............................,.,.....................,...........,.,...........,..............,......... ...,.........,..........,.........,........,........".... SUBJECT: 199912000 Youth Commission Work Plan CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMA TI ON STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ...................................................................,................................................................................................................................... .,...................................,...................... ...A TTA ç ~.M;~~.T~.:.... ..çg ~~ ~}J .~~ ~~~ ~.~ ~~.. ~.~~.~ g~.J ~.~ A~~~.~..P ~.~ ~~ Þ. .C?~. § ?). ~~ ~........................... ................................ ........... SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: On October 11,1999, the Youth Commission held a special meeting to develop their work pan for the 199912000 school year. The list of activities is as follows: 1) Adopt-a- Family; 2) Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Celebration; 3) Art Expo; 4) All City Dance; 5) Youth Talent Show; 6) Youth Recognition Night; 7) Outdoor Basketball and Volleyball Tournament; 8) Battle of the Bands; 9) Skate Park. ..,.....................................................,......................,..............................................,......................................,................................. ............................................................ CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On December 13, the Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee passed a motion to approve the 199912000 Youth .. ..çg.~,~~.~ ~g.'!..~ ~ ~~. ~J~. ~~~..f <? ~.':1.~~. ~~. ç~ ~Y.. ç~ ~~~ gJ<?~ ..':1.PP ~~.Y.~~:,...................,............ .............. ........ .................,.. ....................... ,.. .. ,ç. r!X .. M;A.~.A ç.~.~ , ~ .ç,.Q ~.M;~ ~P..A!.~ 9.. N ~.. A. p. P'!g Y. ~ ..ç g ~!1.~. ~,tç g ~~.~ ~~.~ ~J~.~ g ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~g.~.:.. . .. ... .. .. , .. .. ... ...... .. .. ... APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCI~ PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Item 5E CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Date: December 6, 1999 From: Kurt Reuter, Athletics and Specialized Services Manager Subject: 1999/2000 Youth Commission Work Plan Backeround: On October II, 1999, the City of Federal Way Youth Commission held a special meeting to develop the work plan for the 1999/2000 school year. The list of activities and events..and when they are scheduled is as follows: 1. Adopt-a-Family - December 2. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Celebration - January 3. Art Expo - February 4. All City Dance - February 5. Youth Talent Show - March 6. Youth Recognition Night - April 7. Outdoor Basketball and Volleyball Tournament - 4th of July 8. Battle ofthe Bands - August (as part of Family Fest) 9. Skate Park - Ongoing Committee Recommendation: Move to forward 1999/2000 Youth Commission Work Plan to full Council for approval. MITTEE REPORT: I /-"( :fþ-r<- ' Vj.._.v~lt..¿). L/ Committee Membef '.. .~~~ !~~.~..~ ~ !~,~..... .~~ ~~. .~:.~~............................................... .~.!.~.~~... d!. ((......."- ì.... .................................................. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ... ~~~~~~!..: .......~~ ~~.~~..~ ~~..~:.~~~~~~~~~.?.! ~~~~.~.. ~~~ ~~Y...~!~J. :,~~............. ................ ...... ...., .... .... ....... ...... ......... ............ ..................., CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT _ORDINANCE _BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION _STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ .......................................................,.................................................................................,......................,...................................... .........,.................................................. ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum dated December 7, 1999 to the Parks, Recreation, Public Safety and Human Services Committee. ..........................................................................,...........................................................................,............................,.,................. ...................,........................................ SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Residents in the vicinity of 6th Avenue SW between SW 320th Street and SW 330th Street requested the installation of speed humps along that stretch of 6th Avenue SW based on concerns of high traffic speeds and cut-through traffic along that street. A traffic study conducted by staff in September 1999 indicated that the subject location would receive 1.0 point for traffic volume, 0.5 points for traffic speed, and 2.0 points for accident experience. Therefore, the total number of points is 3.5, which meets the 3.0 point minimum to qualify for speed hump installation. In a neighborhood meeting staff conducted on October 13, 1999, after a discussion of traffic calming alternatives, residents requested the installation of four speed humps at a spacing of approximately 600 feet to replace the three existing all-way stop signs, which were viewed by residents as ineffective. Staff sent ballots to property owners and occupants within 600 feet of the proposed speed hump locations. One of the .. ,~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~.~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~ ~:.~.~ ~ , !:.9: ~~~:. ~ ..~..? g.~.. ~.~J. ~.~~ ~~ , ? ~ .~~:. . !:. ~.~!?:. ~ . ~ ~~.~ ~ ~~ : .. .~. ~ .~} ~ ~.~ ~~,~ ?~.. ~.: ~. ~~ :.. ~~~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ 5 !~.~:!~.~ :... .. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its December 13, 1999 meeting, The Parks, Recreation, Public Safety, and Human Services Committee forwarded to the full City Council the staff recommendation to install four speed humps on 6th Avenue SW between SW 320th Street and SW 330th Street and to remove the three existing all-way stop signs along that stretch. Stop signs on cross streets off 6th ...~.~:?~:..~.~..~~Y...~:.. ~.~.~~~.~~.~:~:......... ............. .'.......................,..... ... ... ".'.......".............. ..... ............ .......................... ...,................ ......................., ....... CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Approve Council Committee recommendation. ~ ;;~~~ ~~; ~~¡~~¡~ ~~~~ ~~ ¿~ ~~~~ ¡; ¡~~~ ~; ~mmmmmmmm (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # K:\COUNCIL\AGDBILLS\1999\panther Ik speed humps.wpd CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Date: December 7, 1999 From: Rick Perez, Traffic Engineer Subject: Panther Lake Neighborhood Traffic Safety Project Backeround: Residents in the vicinity of 6th Avenue SW between SW 320th Street and SW 330th Street requested the installation of speed humps along that stretch of 6th A venue S W based on concerns of high traffic speeds and cut-through traffic along that street. Currently adopted installation criteria are based on a point system as follows: 0.5 1.0 0.3 - 0.5 0.5 - 0.7 500 - 1100 1101-1700 85th Percentile Speed, (mph). . .! 26 - 29 1.5 2.0 0.7 - 0.9 0.9-1.1 1701 - 2300 2301 - 2900 29.1-32 32.1 - 35 2.5 3.0 1.1 - 1.3 2901 - 3500 35.1 - 38 38.1-41 More than 1.3 More than 3500 More than 41 Installation criteria are met if the total number of severity points is equal to or greater than 3.0. A traffic study conducted by staff in September 1999 indicated that the subject location would receive 1.0 point for traffic volume, 0.5 points for traffic speed, and 2.0 points for accident experience. Therefore, the total number of points is 3.5, which meets the 3.0 point minimum to qualify for speed hump installation. In a neighborhood meeting staff conducted on October 13, 1999, after a discussion of traffic calming alternatives, residents requested the installation of four speed humps at a spacing of approximately 600 feet to replace the three existing all-way stop signs, which were viewed by residents as ineffective. Staff sent ballots to property owners and occupants within 600 feet of the proposed speed hump locations and the following table summarizes the ballot results: I Hump Location I 1 ! 2 ! 3 ,- 4 . ! Ballots Sent 116 114 92 102 Ballots Returned 34 40 41 48 Yes Votes 29 (85%) 31 (78%) 34 (83%) 38 (79%) No Votes 5 (15%) 9 (22%) 7 (17%) 10 (21 %) One of the installation criteria requires a 50% majority of the returned ballots. Based on the above table, all locations met the balloting criteria. Committee Recommendation: Staff requests a recommendation of approval to City Council on the meeting scheduled for December 21, 1999, to install four speed humps on 6th Avenue SWbetween SW 320th Street and SW 330th Street and to remove the three existing all-way stop signs along that stretch. Stop signs on cross streets off of 6th Avenue S W may be maintained. APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ~/ €+J"TCS kßt(¡¿ßlb~E Committee Chair Committee Member ,4Y Þ(!tf-~ Committee Member K:\PRHSPS\panther.wpd MEETING DATE: January 4, 2000 ITEM# J( (/ ~ ...............................................................,.....................................................,................................................................................. ...........................................,. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM .................................................................................................................,..........,....._,.,.........................................,.....................,. ............................................. SUBJECT: Council Committee Preferences CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT ORDINANCE _X_BUSINESS HEARING FYI _RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT _PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ...........................,.........................................................,...............,...........................................,..................................................... ..............,.............................. ATTACHMENTS: Committee Appointment Preference Form ....................................................................................,.............,......................""""'............,.........,........................................,......... ............................."""""" SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Pursuant to Federal Way City Council Rules of Procedure, Section 21, the Mayor makes committee assignments each January, taking into consideration the interests and requests of individual Councilmembers; members serve one year terms. Membership of each committee consists of three members. The following committees have been established: (1) Finance/Economic DevelopmentfRegional Affairs; (2) Land Useffransportation; and (3) ParksfRecreation/Human Services & Public Safety. There are also the following non-Council committees with city appointment authority: (1) Airport Communities Coalition (ACC); (2) South County Area Transportation Board (SCA TBd); (3) Lakehaven/City Liaison Committee; and (4) School/City Liaison Committee. ...................................................,.........,.,..........,.............",.........."........."""""""""""""""""""""""""""..........,......................,...................."""..... .....,....... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""......................................................""""""""""""""""""""""""""',............................ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Councilmembers to indicate their committee choices in order of preference, #1 being the highest preference, and to submit their completed form to the Mayor. The Mayor will then make committee appointments for the year 2000. ...........................,...........,...........,......................................................................................................................,............................ ........,.......,........,......"........... APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNC~ PACKET: , (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: _APPROVED DENIED _TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # I:\COVERCCO-l/4/00 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE FORM Council Member Name (Please Print) I Council Committee Preferences Please indicate your committee choices in order of preference, #1 being highest preference. FinanceÆconomic Develooment/Regional Affairs Committee Currently meets the last Tuesday of the month, at 12:00 p.m. or 5:30 p.m., times alternating monthly, to study issues related to finance, economic development, legislative or regional affairs, contracts, franchises, monthly vouchers, and purchasing activities. Oversees the Arts Commission and Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. Select one box to indicate preference: 10 20 3D Land Use/Transportation Committee Currently meets the 1st & 3rd Monday - 5:30 p.m. to address land use issues, land use code and comprehensive plan amendments, public works projects, and general Community Development Services and Public Works issues. Select one box to indicate preference: 10 20 3D ParkslRecreationlHuman Services & Public Safety Committee Currently meets 2nd Monday at 5:30 p.m. and 4th Monday at 12:00 p.m. to study issues related to Parks, Public Safety, Human Services, neighborhood traffic safety and the Municipal Court. Select one box to indicate preference: 10 20 3D Continued on other side II Non-Council Committees/City has Appointment Authority Please indicate if you are interested in serving on these committees or boards, in order of preference, #1 being your highest preference. If not, please check the first box. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Committee Meetings scheduled by committee as needed. Purpose is to represent Federal Way's interest as a member of the ACC regarding pending ACC litigation and mitigation related to Sea Tac Airport expansIOn. Select one box to indicate preference: Not interested 0 I 0 2 0 30 fumtþ County Area Transportation ~ (SCA TBd) Meets 3rd Tuesday from 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.moo Serves as a central forum for public and private sector agencies to exchange information, build consensus, coordinate efforts to address transportation issues, and promote transportation programs that benefit South King County. Select one box to indicate preference: Not interested 0 I 0 2 0 30 Lakehaven/Citv Liaison Committee Meets quarterly, 3rd Tuesday at 7:30 a.m. Serves as elected level forum for discussion of joint issues concerning elected officials and City and District staff. Select one box to indicate preference: Not interested 0 I 0 2 0 30 School /Citv Liaison Committee Meets quarterly, 2nd Monday at 7:30 a.m. Serves as elected level forum for discussion of joint Issues. Select one box to indicate preference: Not interested 0 I 0 20 30 Membership on other regional committees has been coordinated by Derek Matheson who contacted all of you last week. If you have further questions regarding membership on such regional committees, please do not hesitate to contact Derek. K:\fonns\ccmte.app