The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 07-02-2002 Special/Regular City of Federal Way City Council Meeting AGENDA COUNCILMEMBERS Jeanne Burbidge, Mayor Eric Faison Linda Kochmar Mary Gates Dean McColgan Michael Hellickson Mike Park CITY MANAGER David H. Moseley Office of the City Clerk July 2, 2002 I. II. III. IV. V. AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall July 2, 2002 (www.ci.federal.wav.wa.us) ***** SPECIAL SESSION - 5:00 p.m. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. P ARKS/RECREATION COMMISSION INTERVIEWS III. ADJOURNMENT **** * REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATIONS a. b. City Manager/Introduction of New Employees City ManagerlEmerging Issues CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor. please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long. relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval; all items are enacted by one motion Individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion Over please. VI. VII. a. b. VIII. Ix. X. a. b. XI. a. b. c. Minutes/June 18, 2002 Regular Meeting Vouchers Monthly Financial Report Council Bill #298/Non-Conforming Uses/Single Family Residential Code Amendment/Enactment Ordinance Council Bill #299/Non-Conforming Structures/Single Family Residential Code Amendment/Enactment Ordinance Council Bill #300lPortion ofS 298'h Street Vacation/Enactment Ordinance Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II Improvements Project (S 324'h to S 340'" St)/85% Design Status Report So 364'h St Culvert Replacement Proiect/l 00% Design Approval & Authorization to Bid Draft I-5/SRI8/SRI6l Triangle Study Stripe Rite Contract Amendment/Payement Marking Regional Disaster PlanlPublic & Priyate Organizations in King County/ lnterlocal Agreement d. e. f. g. h. l. j. k. PUBLIC HEARING 2003-2008 Transportation Improyement Plan . Staff Report . Citizen Comment (3-minute limit per person) . City Council Deliberation . Resolution CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Parks/Recreation Commission Appointments Ethics Board Appointment CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b) ADJOURNMENT .. THECOUNClL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA .. THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AYAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW-FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LIBRARY" MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# ~(Ct.,) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ¿<:J CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the regular City Council meeting held on June 18,2002. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent record pursuant to RCW requirements. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the minutes of the City Council regular meeting held June 18.2002." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDffiEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05110/2001 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Regular Meeting June 18,2002 - 7:00 p.m. ***** ~~ <v~ Minutes I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Burbidge called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of7:l0 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeanne Burbidge, Deputy Mayor Dean McColgan, Councilmembers Eric Faison, Michael Hellickson, Linda Kochmar, Mike Park. Mayor Burbidge excused Councilmember Mary Gates. Staff present: City Manager Dayid Moseley, City Attorney Bob Sterbank, City Clerk Chris Green, and Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Deputy Mayor McColgan led the flag salute. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED TO ADD TO THE CONSENT AGENDA A NEW ITEM, ITEM V(k), TITLED "RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE PRESENTATION OF THE 2003-2008 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN"; COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SECOND. Councilmember Faison noted the city is required to file a 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan with the State of Washington prior to July 31st each year. This resolution setting the public hearing for the July 2, 2002 meeting was inadyertently omitted from the tonight's Consent Agenda. The main motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes Federal Way City Council Meeting Regalar Minutes June /8, 2002- Page 2 of JO III. PRESENT A TIONS a. Barbershop Quartet/Entertainment Unfortunately, the barbershop quartet was unable to attend tonight's meeting, this item has been postponed to a future meeting date. b. Diversity Commission/Introduction & Certificates of Appointment Councilmember Kochmar was pleased to introduce and present certificates of appointment to the following new and returning Diyersity Commissioners: Ron Walker, Prakash Melootto, Deborah S. Robinson, Carolina Lucero, Debra A. Robinson, Julia Laranang, and Byron Lightboum. c. City Manager/Introduction of New Employees City Manager was pleased to announce and introduce new employees Steyen Olson, who has been hired as a new Police Officer, and Cathy Williams, who has been hired as the City's new Domestic Violence AdYocate. d. City Manager/Emerging Issues City Manager Dayid Moseley announced there were no emerging issues tonight. IV. CITIZEN COMMENT Dave Larson, spoke and recognized Ryan Pool, an elementary school student for receiving the "starfish" award for his service to the community. Nancy Combs, asked Council to look into traffic problems with speeding near her neighborhood along 21s1 Ave SW and 3l2th Street. Judy Carlson, encouraged Council to listen to the yoters and citizens of Federal Way, not hired consultants, in regards to spending additional monies on a municipal facility building. Dave McKenzie and Myla Montgomery, spoke in continued opposition to the Oxford House locating in the Twin Lakes neighborhood. Art Chambers, spoke in support of the Oxford House and the benefits such an environment creates for those in need of support from drug and alcohol addictions. Fetlerttl Way City Council Meeting Regular Minutes June 18, 2002 - Page 3 of 10 Bill May, (comments read into the record by the City Clerk) requested Council deyelop a plan of making video tapes of Council meetings be available to lend through the city or library. Public Works Director Cary Roe responded to Ms. Combs comments made on traffic safety issues. He added this area has been previously looked at, and would like Council to giye staff a direction. Councilmembers concurred to send this item to the Land Use/Transportation Committee for further review and discussion. v. j. k. CONSENT AGENDA a. b. Minutes/June 4, 2002 Regular Meeting -Approved Purchase of Copier for Public Safety-Approved Tourism Enhancement Grant Awards-Approved Renewal/lnterlocal Cooperation Agreement for King County CDBG and/or HOME Consortium-Approved 2003 CDBG Pass Through Acceptance-Approved 2002 Human Services Commission Work Plan-Approved Vacuum/Jet Rodding Service Contract Bid Award-Approved Pacific Highway So HOV Lanes Phase I Improyement Project Bid Award Tresden Place Final Plat Approyal/Resolution-Approved Resolution # 02-364 Interlocal Agreement with City of Bellevue for K9 Training-Approved Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Date for the Presentation of the 2003- 2008 Transportation Improyement Plan (TIP)/Resolution-Approved Resolution #02-365 (ADDED ITEM) c. d. e. f. g. h. i. COUNCILMEMBER PARK MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SECOND. Deputy Mayor McColgan pulled Item (c)/Tourism Enhancement Grant Awards. The main motion to approye Consent Items (a), (b), (d), (e), (t), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k) passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park Faison Hellickson McColgan yes excused yes yes yes yes yes Consent Item (c)/Tourism Enhancement Grant Awards: Federill WilY City Council Meeting Regular Minutes June 18, 2002 - Pilge 4 of 10 Deputy Mayor McColgan asked for a brief staff report on this item. Patrick Doherty, Community Development Deputy DirectorlEconomic Deyelopment, reviewed each of the four eyents that would be awarded grant monies. These include the Northwest Allstars/Fastbreak Basketball Association "NW Shootout", Federal Way Track Club/Hershey's Track Meet, Pacific Northwest Swimmining USA Swimming Disability Championships, and the Pacific Northwest Association Synchronized Swimming USA Age Championships. Councilmember Hellickson inquired to the number of applications received and the level of recruiting done for these grant monies to ensure the biggest returns to the city. Mr. Doherty explained the four grants awarded were the total ofthose received; he also commented on the current steps taken for notifying potential grant recipients, and noted the topic of recruitment for applicants would be further discussed at the Lodging Tax Adyisory Committee meetings. DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEM (qrrOURISM ENHANCEMENT GRANT A WARDS; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes VI. PUBLIC HEARING Citizen Requested Zoning Text Changes Mayor Burbidge read into record the procedures to be followed for the public hearing and opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. . Staff Report Senior Planner Margaret Clark gaye a presentation to Council on the six requests received for zoning text changes. She noted four requests were from the same applicant, who asked to expand the allowable uses in the Neighborhood Business (BN) zone, and the remaining two requests were from different applicants who are requesting changes to the zoning code to allow more flexibility for offices in the Business Park (BP) zone. Federal Way City Coullcil Meeting Regular Millutes Julie 18, 2002 - Page 5 of 10 Ms. Clark reported the Land Use/Transportation Committee concurred with staff recommendations to further study all six requests. . Citizen Comment Chami Joe Ro, (comments read into the record by the City Clerk) expressed support of requests zoning text changes to the Neighborhood Business (BN) zone. Bill May, spoke against and changes in the current zoning code that would allow high density housing. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Burbidge closed the public hearing at 8:32 p.m. . City Council Deliberation & Action Councilmembers reminded applicants that approyal at this point would simply move these requests on in the process for further study and discussion. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED APPROVAL OF THE LAND USEffRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO DIRECT STAFF TO FURTHER REVIEW THE SIX REQUESTS FOR ZONING TEXT CHANGES AND PREPARE TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes VII. INTRODUCTION ORDINANCES a. Council Bill #298/Non-Conforming Uses/Single Family Residential Code Amendment AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL CITY CODE TO ADDRESS NONCONFORMING SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL USES. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED APPROVAL OF COUNCIL BILL #298/NON-CONFORMING USES/SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL CODE AMENDMENT; COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Federal WilY City Council Meeting Regular Minutes June 18, 2002 - Pllge 6 of 10 Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes City Clerk Chris Green noted the Council Rules of Procedure requires a first and second reading before enactment, unless a motion is made to suspend Council Rules and moye final adoption at the same meeting. City Attorney Bob Sterbank concurred and adyised Councilmember Faison move to reconsider the preyious question. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED TO RECONSIDER THE PREVIOUS MOTION TO APPROVE COUNCIL BILL #298; COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED COUNCIL BILL #298/NON- CONFORMING USES/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CODE AMENDMENT TO SECOND READING/ENACTMENT AT THE JULY 2ND COUNCIL MEETING; COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park b. yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes Council Bill #299/Non-Conforming Structures/Single Family Residential Code Amendment AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE TO ADDRESS NONCONFORMING SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED COUNCIL BILL #299/NON- CONFORMING STRUCTURES/SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL CODE AMENDMENT TO SECOND READING/ENACTMENT AT THE JULY 2ND COUNCIL MEETING; COUCNILMEMBER HELLICKSON SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Federal Way City Council Meeting Regular Minutes June 18, 1001- Page 7 of /0 Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes c. Council Bill #300/Portion of So 298th Street Vacation AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF SOUTH 29STH STREET IN THE' VICINITY OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH 29STH STREET AND MILITARY ROAD. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED COUNCIL BILL #300IPORTION OF SO. 29STH STREET V ACA TION TO SECOND READlNGIENACTMENT AT THE JULY 2ND COUNCIL MEETING; DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park VIII. yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Sex Predator Siting Legislation COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON MOVED TO WAIVE THE STAFF PRESENTATION AND DIRECT STAFF TO TAKE NO ACTION TO ESTABLISH A SEX PREDATOR SITING PROCESS; COUNCIL MEMBER PARK SECOND. Councilmember Faison requested a friendly amendment to divide the main motion into separate motions; Councilmember Hellickson concurred. Councilmember Kochmar noted she would abstain from the vote. COUNCIL MEMBER HELLICKSON MOVED TO AMEND THE PREVIOUS QUESTION TO WAIVE THE STAFF PRESENTATION ON SEX PREDATOR SITING LEGISLATION; COUNCILMEMBER FAISON SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates no excused Faison Hellickson yes yes Federal Way City Council Meeting Regular Minutes June 18, 2002 - Page 8 of 10 Kochmar Park abstain yes McColgan yes COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON MOVED TO NOT CONSIDER ANY ACTION AT THIS TIME TO ESTABLISH A SEX PREDATOR SITING PROCESS; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge no Faison no Gates excused Hellickson yes Kochmar abstain McColgan yes Park yes b. c. Interlocal Agreement with Yakima County for Jail Services lnterlocal Agreement with Cities for Yakima County Jail Services Renton Jail Services Interlocal Agreement d. Councilmembers commended staff for working pro-actiyely with agencies to reduce the jail costs for housing misdemeanor offenders. COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR MOVED APPROVAL OF BUSINESS ITEMS (b )/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH YAKIMA COUNTY FOR JAIL SERVICES; ITEM (c)/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH CITIES FOR YAKIMA COUNTY JAIL SERVICES; AND ITEM (d)/RENTON JAIL SERVICES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT; COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Gates Kochmar Park yes excused yes yes Faison Hellickson McColgan yes yes yes Ix. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Kochmar noted the Sister City Baseball team left for Japan to play in the Sister City Baseball Tournament. She encouraged citizens to attend the Red, White and Blues Festiyal on July 4th at Celebration Park; and updated Council on her attendance at various regional meetings and community events. Councilmember Park noted he would be attending the Association of Washington Cities Annual Conference in Yakima along with Mayor Burbidge. Federal Way City Council Meeting Regular Minutes June 18, 2002 - Page 9 of 10 Councilmember Hellickson announced the next meeting of the Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee would be held Tuesday, June 25th at 3:00 p.m, in the Mt. Baker Conference Room. Councilmember Faison announced the next meeting of the Land Use/Transportation Committee would be held July I 5t at 5 :30 p,m. He also requested staff contact Pete Yon Reichbauer and invite him to attend the next meeting where the triangle study would be discussed, Deputy Mayor McColgan clarified that the triangle study refers to the study of the 1-5 off- ramp at 34Sth Street and Hwy 18 interchange, He noted this is a heavily used area in Federal Way, and this study is looking at possible modifications or deyelopments for improvement. Mayor Burbidge updated Council on her attendance at yarious regional meetings and community eyents, and encouraged citizens to attend upcoming attractions at the Knutzen Family Theatre. x. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley reported the Sister City Baseball Team has left for Japan, where they will play four games over six days, He again thanked all of the private and corporate donations for funding this trip. Mr, Moseley noted the Association of Washington Cities would be holding its Annual Conference in Yakima on June 19th-21st; Mayor Burbidge and Councilmember Park will be attending, He reminded citizens ofthe 10th Annual Red, White and Blues Festival at Celebration Park on July 4th. He encouraged eyeryone to attend the festiyities that begin at 4:00 p.m. with the fireworks display at 10:00 p,m, He thanked Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Center Director Jennifer Schroder and her staff on their hard work each year for this positiye community event. City Manager David Moseley stated the executive session scheduled for tonight has been canceled, XL EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42,30, II 0(1 )(i) -CANCELED Federal Way City Council Meeting Regalar Minates June /8, 2002-Page JOof JO XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Burbidge adjourned the regular meeting at 9: I 0 p.m. Stephanie D. Courtney Deputy City Clerk MEETING DATE: ~d-I-l..ððJ:... , ~ee2 ITEM# :e::-~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VOUCHERS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ¡g] CONSENT D RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $1,478,690.77 $1,478,690.77 $ ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials haye been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Way, Washingto d that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claims. M CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approye attached youchers pursuant to RCW 42.24 PROPOSED MOTION: I moye approyal of Vouchers. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 GZ CITY 8F ,..--. ED~ MEMORANDUM Date: June 21,2002 To: Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee From: Tho Kraus, Financial Management Supervisor Subject: Vouchers Action ReQuested: Accept the vouchers and forward to the Next Council meeting for approval. CommIttee Chair ~-- ý~ Committee ember Committee Member ~¿T~ ð( C 1/ K-eI k:\fin\acctspay\checkrun\mfr cover.doc Gi- apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank 166697 OS/22/2002 002477 HOME DEPOT Voucher: 166697 166698 OS/24/2002 002623 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN APRIL 2002 Voucher: 166698 166699 OS/24/2002 005254 U S BANCORP Voucher: 166699 166700 OS/28/2002 003109 WOODSTONE CREDIT UNI Voucher: 166700 166701 OS/28/2002 005253 US BANCORP Voucher: 166701 16670205/31/2002006398 A & B REFLECTORIZING INC 2961 Voucher: 166702 16670305/31/2002006435 A PLUS WAREHOUSE Voucher: 166703 16670405/31/2002003182 MCE LOCKBOX 4666 Voucher: 166704 16670505/31/2002000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I Voucher: 166705 16670605/31/2002000385 ACCOUNTEMPS Voucher: 166706 Check # Date Vendor ()") ~ Invoice 5351121 April 2002 Iny Date Description 04117/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 04/25/2002 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 05106/2002 PS-LODGING-KARL CALHOU TERMINATION 05/08/2002 MSA-LEASE PAYMENTS/SDB MAY 2002 17858 MCE-CRUZ 0043517-1 0643837-1 07405248 07445639 07373726 16670705/31/2002000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 12898 Voucher: 166707 12895 12886 12883 12894 16670805/31/2002006525 ADVANCED TRANSIT ASSOC C1980R11282 Voucher: 166708 16670905/31/2002 001652 ALLWEST UNDERGROUND I AU130288 Voucher: 166709 16671005/31/2002006539 ALVIS, BRIAN C. Voucher: 166710 16671105/31/2002001110 AMAYA ELECTRIC Voucher: 166711 02-101892-00 6679-1 6679-1 05/06/2002 MSF-CITY TRAVEL EXPENSE 04116/2002 SWMM-TRAFFIC CONES: 28" 04/23/2002 PS-P681 03 GRAY LOCKERS- OS/24/2002 CDB - MCE ANNUAL DUES/C OS/28/2002 LAW- MONTHLY CHRG 04/05/2002 LAW-SPECIAL DEL. ROBERT 05/07/2002 TEMP FINANOE OFFICE STA 05115/2002 TEMP FINANCE OFFICE STA 05/01/2002 TEMP FINANCE OFFICE STA 05/07/2002 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 05/03/2002 PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 05/01/2002 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 04/30/2002 PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 05/02/2002 PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 05121/2002 PKDBC-R'EFUND RENTAL DE 05/13/2002 SWMCIP-MAINT. SUPPLIES; F OS/20/2002 PW-EXP REVIEW REFUND 04/25/2002 PKM-FACILITIES ELECTRICA 04125/2002 PKM-FACILITIES ELECTRICA Amount Paid 163.36 72.03 5,188.46 10,752.00 3,190.63 1,464.79 2,289.94 60.00 96.00 40.00 1,230.80 1,230.80 1,107,72 340.95 19.62 288.67 268,00 23.89 150,00 277.44 500.00 3,062.69 351.77 Check Total 163,36 72.03 5,188.46 10,752.00 3,190.63 1,464.79 2,289,94 60.00 136.00 3,569.32 941.13 150.00 277.44 500,00 3,414.46 Page: 1 apChklst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 16671205/31/2002 005287 AMERICAll COMMUNICATIO D6416 Voucher: 166712 D6417 16671305/31/2002000721 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC 0079523 Voucher: 166713 0079730 0079432 0079941 0079524 0079319 0079629 0079275 0079698 0080017 0079318 0079859 16671405/31/2002003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVC 2195 Voucher: 166714 2188 2189 2196 2197 2191 2192 2194 2190 2198 2193 2187 325602 ~ Date Vendor ~ ..ç 16671505/31/2002003129 AMS LASER SUPPLY Voucher: 166715 166716 05/31/2002 006036 ANDERSON DESIGN CONSU Voucher: 166716 166717 05/3112002 005833 ANNA'S PARTY RENTALS Voucher: 166717 16671805/31/2002005822 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENS Voucher: 166718 Invoice Iny Date Description 05/01/2002 SWM"AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 05/01/2002 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 04/25/2002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 05/03/2002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 04/23/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 05/13/2002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 04/25/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 04/1812002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 04/30/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 04/1712002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 05/0212002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 05/15/2002 $WM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 04/1812002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS 05/09/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 05/0612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 0510612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 0510612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/0612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/06/2002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/0612002 AGOO-5Ö: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/0612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/0612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/0612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/06/2002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 05/06/2002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAl NT 05/0612002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 04/1912002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER Amount Paid 110.75 85.21 418.88 633.76 401.89 83.23 311.44 285.60 280.16 252.96 247.52 201.28 95.20 91.39 1,094.85 982.35 906.45 1,729.00 874.00 195.30 745.45 667.50 503.05 475.00 454.05 225.30 249.04 100139 04/2912002 SWMCIP:SITE & SOIL EVAL., 780.00 10885 05/0312002 PRCS-CHINA FOR MOTHER' 41.77 L02-030991 05/02/2002 PS-POLICE TRAINING 493.03 L02-038541 05/10/2002 PS-POLICE TRAINING 94.34 Check Total 195.96 3,303.31 8,852.30 249.04 780.00 41.77 587.37 Page: 2 apChkLst 05/3112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Inyoice 16671905/31/2002 000437 ASSOCIATED COURIERS INC 147377 Voucher: 166719 147588 147500 147715 0504916115 16672005/31/2002 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE Voucher: 166720 166721 05/31/2002 000575 ATTORNEYS INFORMATION E42707 Voucher: 166721 43531 16672205/31/2002 003800 AVA (ASSN FOR VOLUNTEER AVA-OWENS Voucher: 166722 166723 05/31/2002 005587 AVAYA INC 2713 Voucher: 166723 16672405/31/2002 006436 BAKER COMMUNCIATIONS I 2797 Voucher: 166724 166725 05/31/2002 006533 BEALL, SHELLY Voucher: 166725 166726 05/31/2002 003565 BEL CUSTOM CLEANERS Voucher: 166726 166727 05/31/2002 005645 BERTUCCI, MICHAEL Voucher: 166727 <y \J'\ 2713627132 100470 3509 013827 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 04/08/2002 PWA-COURIER SERVICES; E 35.50 04/22/2002 CDB - COURIER SERVICE - E 37.50 04/15/2002 CDB - COURIER SERVICE - E 35.50 04/29/2002 CDB - COURIER SERVICE - E 31.75 140.25 05/10/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 14.94 14.94 03/31/2002 LAW- MONTHLY CHRG. APR 24.00 04/30/2002 LAW- MONTHLY CHRG. APR 24.00 48.00 OS/21/2002 PS-AVA MEMBERSHIP DUES 50.00 50.00 05/12/2002 MSTEL-SYS MAl NT 1,986.91 1,986.91 05110/2002 PS-MONROE CALCULATOR ~ 216.51 216.51 05117/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC CL 35.00 35.00 04/30/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLEANING:AP 2,485.54 2,485.54 05/16/2002 PS-REIMB:SNIPER AMMUNITI 130.49 130.49 Page: 3 apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice CJ> ~ 166728 05/31/2002 005098 BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO :247947 Voucher: 166728 248279 248565 248439 247824 248356 248183 247694 247961 247641 248203 248376 248057 248032 248474 247735 Inv Date Description 04/29/2002 MSFL T-LOF 05109/2002 MSFL T-LOF OS/21/2002 MSFL T-LOF 05/1612002 MSFL T-DIAGNOSTICS 04/25/2002 MSFL T-HORN REPLACEMEN 05/13/2002 MSFLT-LOF 05/06/2002 MSFL T-LOF 04/22/2002 MSFL T-UPHOLSTERY SVCS 04/30/2002 MSFL T -LOF 0412012002 MSFL T -UPHOLSTERY SVCS 05/07/2002 MSFLT-LOF 05/14/2002 MSFL T-REPAIRS 05/0312002 MSFL T-LOF 05/02/2002 MSFL T-LOF 05/17/2002 MSFLT-LOF 04/23/2002 MSFL T-LOF Amount Paid 597.39 548.18 410.61 272.99 232.40 195.13 776.90 119.34 16.85 119.34 71.24 70.72 54.75 52.17 32.71 16.85 Check Total 3,587.57 Page: 4 apChkLst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Check # Date Vendor Inyoice 16673005/31/2002001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFo.RM Co. 1237382 Voucher: 166730 239086 237248-01 244857 244651 244985 247445 243027 243035 247135 240799-01 243790 242367-02 246766 245707 241792-01 243048 243036 245533 243049 247440 245013 247444 247310 247435 244861 244862 247441 247401 242353-01 242575 245795-01 246918 247433 242344-80 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFo.RM CLo.THING 775.58 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 775.58 04/26/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 721.24 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 668.74 04/29/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 600.03 05/0612002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 546.67 05/1612002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 542.59 04/2312002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 449.67 05/06/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 418.66 05/1612002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 391.52 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 369.27 04/2612002 PS-UNIFO,RM CLOTHING 286.52 05/06/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 271.89 05/0612002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 267.32 05/06/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 260.79 05/01/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 245.83 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 234.90 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 234.90 05/01/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 210.85 04/26/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 183.76 05/1612002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 180.50 05/0112002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 169.62 05/1612002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 169.62 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 158.30 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 154.39 04/26/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 124.85 05/01/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 117.45 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 117.45 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 117.45 04/24/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 110.92 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 110.65 05/0612002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 106.57 05/06/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 86.99 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 86.44 05/0912002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 74.26 Page: 5 apChkLst 05131/2002 1:34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 166731 05/31/2002004919 BRATWEAR Voucher: 166731 16673205/31/2002004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP 003624 Voucher: 166732 003622 16673305/31/2002 006484 BRONTAPES OF WASHINGT 00027060 Voucher: 166733 00026988 166734 05/31/2002 005801 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET, OL 6883-BLAZER Voucher: 166734 6883-LlC/ADM 166735 05/31/2002 005999 CARTWRIGHT LAW OFFICES 38 Voucher: 166735 166736 05/31/2002 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC Voucher: 166736 16673705/31/2002003093 CASCADE COMPUTER MAIN Voucher: 166737 16673805/31/2002 005704 CASCADE ELEVATOR COMPÞ649 Voucher: 166738 645 16673905/31/2002002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIXCONC13454 Voucher: 166739 16674005/31/2002 005798 CERTIFIED LAND SERVICES 176 Voucher: 166740 166741 05/31/2002 001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3324359 Voucher: 166741 3324450 Check # Date Vendor ~. c:P' Inyoice 248066 247289 241327 248059 244153 247467 242359-01 242359-80 242537 242431 247411 246956 245795 123234 20277594 20276616 9052911 InvDate Description 05/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/08/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/16/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/09/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/01/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 04/2312002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 04/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/13/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/13/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 04/29/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 03/31/2002 PS-JUMPSUIT:K-9 PROGRAM 04/18/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04/18/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 05/0812002 PS-EVIDENCE SUPPLlES- 05/03/2002 PS-EVIDENCE SUPPLlES- 05/15/2002 MSFL T-2002 CHEV BLAZER/P 05/15/2002 MSFL T.ADMIN/LiCENSE FEE 04/18/2002 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENSE 4/1 OS/20/2002 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP 05/13/2002 PKRLS-MTG COFFEÉ SUPPL 05/14/2002 MSDp.PRINTER MAINT 05/01/2002 AG01-61: CITY HALL ELEVATC 05/01/2002 AGOO-17f: ELEVATOR MAINT 05/01/2002 SWMCIP-CONCRETE; 1 YA 05/02/2002 AG02-22: S 288TH ST PROJE( 05/09/2002 AGOO-116A: PACIFIC HWY S 05/10/2002 AG01-133A:S 288TH/MILITAR Amount Paid 65.23 56.47 48.96 48.14 30.46 25.40 20.67 11.97 10.88 10.34 3.26 929.26 -6.47 527.31 278.70 101.84 156.67 66.59 20,545.14 86.75 150.00 125.98 57.00 662.16 141.44 141.44 151.23 3,415.08 21,262.46 4,932.29 Check Total 11,596.34 527.31 380.54 223.26 20,631.89 150.00 182.98 662.16 282.88 151.23 3,415.08 26,194.75 Page: 6 apChkLst 0513112002 1:34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 (Continued) Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor 16674205/31/2002006538 CHOi, JOHN Voucher: 166742 16674305/31/2002003002 CHOICES NORTHWEST INC 11422T Voucher: 166743 16674405/31/2002 002472 CHURCH COUNCIL OF SEAT 2002 ROB Voucher: 166744 16674505/31/2002000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK #1904 Voucher: 166745 CK#1908-1 CK#1896 CK#1898 CK#1893 CK#1907 0000198 Invoice 02-102015-00 16674605/31/2002 005817 CITY OF FIFE Voucher: 166746 16674705/31/2002 004412 CITY OF TACOMNSURPLUS ~063-02 Voucher: 166747 16674805/31/2002 005688 CITY OF YAKIMA Voucher: 166748 16674905/31/2002003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA Voucher: 166749 ()\ ~ Inv Date Description OS/22/2002 CDPL-REFUND 02-102015-00 04/24/2002 POLICE OFFICES RECONFiG 05/01/2002 PKDBC-AD.IN2002 DIRECTO 05/16/2002 TRAVEL EXPENSES: S.NEAL 05/16/2002 TRAVEL EXPENSES: S, MCC 05/08/2002 TRAVEL EXPENSES: K. PON 05/13/2002 TRAVEL EXPENSES: K OSBO 05/01/2002 TRAVEL EXPENSES: M. SAD 05/16/2002 TRAVEL EXPENSES: C. SCH 05/07/2002 PS-JAIL SERVICES 04/30/2002 PS-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 5102 FTO TRN 05/16/2002 PS-FTO TRAINING:K. PON, J. T1066222 T1062693 T1062693-1 W1062034 T1 058259 T1058888 T1053773-1 T1062930 W1057901-1 T1059625 T1064373 T1062930-1 T1064918 2002 FORD 166750 05/31/2002 006523 COLUMBIA FORD Voucher: 166750 166751 05/31/2002005208 COMMERCIAL CARD SERVI TJ-APR 02 Voucher: 166751 05/10/2002 PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPL 05/02/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 05/03/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 04/30/2002 PKCP-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLI 04/19/2002 PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPL 04/23/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 04/30/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 05/02/2002 PKRLS-JANlTORIAL SUPPLIE 04/26/2002 MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLlES- 04/24/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 05/06/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 05/06/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 05/08/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE OS/22/2002 MSFLT-PRCS VEH #103/FO 04/30/2002 APR 2002 PROCARD STATErv Amount Paid 3,661.13 3,934.00 140.00 211.16 211.16 600.35 204.00 161.00 173.20 18,900.00 2,867.39 50.00 339.24 194.16 130.53 102.23 82.25 81.56 397.23 61.17 17.67 60.34 40.08 39.95 20.39 20,887.98 751.57 Check Total 3,661.13 3,934.00 140.00 1,560.87 18,900.00 2,867.39 50.00 1,566.80 20,887.98 751.57 Page: 7 apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Inyoice .~ d 16675205/31/2002002935 COMMISSION ON ACCREDIT 13319 Voucher: 166752 16675305/31/2002006524 COMMUNITY OF THE HOLY S C1719R11281 Voucher: 166753 16675405/31/2002005300 COMPAQ CORPORATION 32064515 Voucher: 166754 16675505/31/2002 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF 32661970 Voucher: 166755 32512442 32512447 32512443 32512446 31853517 32694273 32512448 32512445 32512444 32081765 32694291 32512449 32661977 32548401 32840714 32730302 32597393 30937203 32811184 32116097 32512450 32583152 29891366 16675605/31/2002005180 CRISIS MANAGEMENT CONS102-14 Voucher: 166756 Iny Date Description 05/09/2002 PS-UNIFORM EXP:CALEA AC OS/21/2002 PKDBC,REFUND RENTAL DE 05/13/2002 MSDP/RR COMPAQ MONITO 05/07/2002 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 04/09/2002 PKA-OFFICE SUPPLY 05/02/2002 MSHR-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05101/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 04117/2002 PKCP-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQ 05/08/2002 MSF-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/07/2002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER- 05/02/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/14/2002 MSA-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQU 05/09/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 05/03/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 03/08/2002 PKM-CIP-OFFICE SUPPLIES/ 05/13/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 04/18/2002 MSHR-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/01/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 05/06/2002 CD- OFFltE SUPPLIES/EQUI 01/17/2002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER- 05/08/2002 AG99-149C: EMER MGMT CO Amount Paid 7.25 58.23 19,345.73 184.50 125.12 102.92 100.10 100.10 95.83 89.87 75.07 75.07 75.07 53.37 51.89 50.05 45.84 41.35 40.38 277,44 39.53 2,46 39.16 27.25 25.02 23.83 12.86 1,750.00 Check Total 7.25 58.23 19,345.73 1,754.08 1,750.00 Page: 8 apChkLst 05/31/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 3" Check # Date Vendor Inyoice 16675705/31/2002 000939 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C576600 Voucher: 166757 576597 576525 576598 611769 611768 611767 584141 16675805/31/2002 000475 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTE 225823 Voucher: 166758 225717 225046 166759 05/31/2002 000854 D J TROPHY 206952 Voucher: 166759 206014 16676005/31/2002 003472 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS I 22623 Voucher: 166760 22622 166761 05/31/2002000438 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J 0852 Voucher: 166761 0832 16676205/31/2002004932 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY PO6660140101 Voucher: 166762 16676305/31/2002 005399 DYNA SYSTEMS Voucher: 166763 04/29/2002 PKM-SHOP SUPPLIES Inv Date Description 04/30/2002 MC-WATER/COOLER RENTA 04/30/2002 PKCP-WATER/COOLER REN 04/30/2002 PKM-WATER/COOLER RENT 04/30/2002 PKRCS-WATER/COOLER RE 04/30/2002 PKRCS-WATER/COOLER RE 04/30/2002 PKDBC-WATER/COOLER RE 04/30/2002 PKCP-WATER/COOLER REN 11/30/2001 PKM-WATER/COOLER RENT 04/20/2002 PKCHB-ALARM MONITORIN 04/20/2002 PKRLS-ALARM MONITORING 04/20/2002 MC-ALARM MONITORING S 04/19/2002 PWA-PATCHES FOR EMERG 05/15/2Ó02 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES 04/29/2002 PS-RADIO REPAIR SER#270 05/10/2002 PS-RADIO REPAIR SER#270 05/04/2002 PKRCS-FOOD SERVICES- 04/16/2002 PKRCS-FOOD SERVICES- 05/17/2002 PRCS-MOTHER'S DAY EVEN 10456223 Amount Paid 50.70 48.52 329.56 25.46 1.09 22.85 6.53 2.18 103.00 59.74 75.00 360.12 7.07 180.61 82.69 285.27 115.42 47.30 Check Total 486.89 237.74 367.19 263.30 400.69 47.30 337.40 337.40 Page: 9 apChkLst 0513112002 1:34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Inyoice (j) (.? 16676405/31/2002000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11018473 Voucher: 166764 1018542 1018382 1018343 1018926 1018631 1018338 1018191 1018647 1018340 1018866 1018346 1018344 1018276 1018342 1018377 1018612 1018814 1018223 1018459 1018845 4395 4322 8528 166765 05/31/2002 005335 ECO NORTHWEST Voucher: 166765 16676605/31/2002004444 ECOLIGHTS NORTHWEST Voucher: 166766 16676705/31/2002001294 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C20086 Voucher: 166767 EDC 4/26/02 16676805/31/2002000097 EDEN SYSTEMS INC 13486 Voucher: 166768 16676905/31/2002000343 ELEPHANT CAR WASH 200 Voucher: 166769 16677005/31/2002005785 EMERALD PETROLEUM SER 99674 Voucher: 166770 166771 05/31/2002001046 EOUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI5316060 Voucher: 166771 200 Iny Date Description 04/29/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 05/02/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04/25/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04/23/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES OS/20/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 05107/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04/23/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04/16/2002 PS-TIRES 05/07/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04/23/2002 PS-TIRES 05/17/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04123/2002 PS-TIRES 04/23/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04/20/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04123/2002 PS-TIRES 04/25/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 05/06/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 05/15/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04117/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 04/29/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 05116/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 03/31/2002 AG01-104B: CFW MARKET A 02/28/2002 AG01-104B: CFW MARKET A 05/07/2002 PWSWR-RECYCLING SERV 08/14/2001 PWT-COMMUTER CHALLEN 04/29/2002 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT E 04130/2002 MSDP-EDEN SYSTEM UPGR.I 04/30/2002 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE 04/30/2002 PWSWR-RECYCLING SVCS: : 04/23/2002 PS-CREDIT REPORTS Amount Paid 655.85 478.25 275.97 241.35 224.34 212.26 209.73 146.01 739.15 146.01 11.64 141.57 124.24 98.01 73.00 48.27 36.96 26.61 25.01 25.01 13.32 2,930.62 162.50 350.00 947.85 35.00 156.25 579.42 1,088.36 20.68 Check Total 3,952.56 3,093.12 350.00 982.85 156.25 579.42 1,088.36 20.68 Page: 10 apChkLst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 3"\ (;ì ~ Date Vendor Invoice 166772 05/31/2002 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0102917 Voucher: 166772 0101847 16677305/31/2002004840 EVAC-EMERGENCYVEHICLE 100940 Voucher: 166773 101010 101014 100968 101015 101001 100993 16677405/31/2002001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR 002870 Voucher: 166774 002866 002843 002730 002876 002725 002721 002720 002723 002874 002722 002724 002877 100799 16677505/31/2002006535 FARKAS, PAT Voucher: 166775 16677605/31/2002006516 FAUCHER, CHRISTINE Voucher: 166776 16677705/31/2002003130 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAP12002 DUES Voucher: 166777 16677805/31/2002 000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-224-89009 Voucher: 166778 4-225-27523 166779 05/31/2002 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO1294 Voucher: 166779 1332 1365 1368 EMP REIMB Inv Date Description 05/1512002 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 04/30/2002 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 04118/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 05110/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 05/13/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 04/28/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 05/13/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 05/08/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 05/0612002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 05/1312002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 05/1312002 MSFL T -REPAIR/MAl NT SVCS 05/07/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04/16/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 05/13/2002 MSFL T -REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04/1612002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04/16/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04116/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04/16/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 05/13/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04/16/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 04/16/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 05/13/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS OS/21/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC CL 03/29/2002 EMPLOYEE EXPENSES REI 04/15/2002 PS-FBINAAANNUAL DUES: A 05/10/2002 MSDP.DELIVERY SERVICES 05/17/2002 LAW-EXPRESS DELIVERY E 03/15/2002 AGOO-102A: TOURISM PROGF 04/30/2002 CHAMBER LUNCH FOR S. L 05/08/2002 CHAMBER LUNCH FOR S. L 05/10/2002 CHAMBER LUNCH FOR S. L Amount Paid 4,132.92 2,087.87 73.56 130.20 73.56 32.55 73.56 73.56 65.10 245.97 244.91 122.32 57.13 43.35 41.83 36.78 287.12 32.50 32.50 32.50 32.50 32.50 14.00 102.20 65.00 97.20 25.45 5,800.00 100.00 5.00 60.00 Check Total 6,220.79 522.09 1,241.91 14.00 102.20 65.00 122.65 5,965.00 Page: 11 apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM FinalCheck List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 16678005/31/2002 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR Voucher: 166780 003887 003889 003888 003926 003848 003833 003768 003049 003851 003870 003731 LAW 5/23/02 ():> ....L 166781 05/31/2002004302 FEDERAL WAY NEWS Voucher: 166781 16678205/31/2002005987 FEDERAL WAY POOL . Voucher: 166782 16678305(31/2002001183 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOAR02466 VolJcher: 166783 166784 05/31/2002 003802 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING SCt-KING 5/4/02 Voucher: 166784 166785 05/31/2002 003066 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 019760 Voucher: 166785 020004 019513 38040 POOL 513/02 16678605/31/2002002664 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Voucher: 166786 166787 05/31/2002 005857 FOILMASTER DESIGNS Voucher: 166787 16678805/31/2002001299 FORD GRAPHICS Voucher: 166788 16678905/31/2002002870 FREEWAY TRAILER SALES I 011700 Voucher: 166789 166790 05/31/2002 000738 G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY 10425' Voucher: 166790 166791 05/31/2002004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC 36811 Voucher: 166791 37310 36758 3691 1207124A 104259 Iny Date Description 05/0812002 CDPL-NOTICE: 05/0812002 CDPL-NOTICE: 05/0812002 CDPL-NOTICE: 05/15/2002 CDPL-NOTICE: 04/27/2002 CDPL-NOTICE: 04/24/2002 CM-NEWSPAPER ADVERTI 05/06/2002 MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS 04/27/2002 CDPL-NOTICE: 04/2712002 CDPL-NOTICE: 05/0412002 CDPL-NOTICE: 02/23/2002 MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS OS/23/2002 LAW-FEDERAL WAY NEWS 1 05103/2002 PRCS-SPECIALIZED REC SW 05/13/2002 PKM-50% UTILITIES CHG/FW 05/04/2002 PRCS-INSTRUCTOR, TEA ET 05/07/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ¡ 05122/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ¡ 04/23/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ¡ 04/23/2002 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVC 05/1312002 PRCS-STUDENT CERTIFIC 05/0212002 PWSCIP-PRINTING SERVICE 05/01/2002 MSFL T-VËHICLE REPAIRS/S 04/18/2002 PKM-WORK BIBS/BLACKSH 04/2512002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/06/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 04/24/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES Amount Paid 239.04 232.40 229.08 212.48 338.14 174.48 59.76 159.36 126.16 119.52 63.25 24.00 178.05 47.30 200.00 27.98 14.99 14.99 297.90 76.38 75.80 140.90 76.15 407.95 -129.37 79.38 Check Total 1,953.67 24.00 178.05 47.30 200.00 57.96 297.90 76.38 75.80 140.90 76.15 357.96 Page: 12 apChkLst 05/3112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 166795 05/31/2002 006528 GRAVES, JODI Voucher: 166795 16679605/31/2002 006530 GRAYSON, EVELYN Voucher: 166796 16679705/31/2002003831 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES 02-005 Voucher: 166797 16679805/31/2002000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY 1122105 Voucher: 166798 1122107 16679905/31/2002004839 HARLAN FAIRBANKS CO llC 58988 Voucher: 166799 16680005/31/2002006529 HOAG, MARY Voucher: 166800 166801 05/31/2002 005378 HOFFMAN, GINA Voucher: 166801 16680205/31/2002003210 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 4536 Voucher: 166802 166803 05/31/2002 003304 HWANG, ANDY Voucher: 166803 Check # Date Vendor 16679205/31/2002 003118 GAll'S INC Voucher: 166792 16679305/31/2002 004385 GAMACHE, JOHN Voucher: 166793 16679405/31/2002001052 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY Voucher: 166794 ~ V\ Inyoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid 554010030101 04/2612002 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF 699.00 556759290101 05/03/2002 PS-POLICE ClOTHING/EQUIF 269.04 556887900101 05/10/2002 PS-POLICE ClOTHING/EQUIF 350.98 556424160101 04/1612002 PS-POLICE ClOTHINGIEQUIF 334.24 556587620101 04/2512002 PS-POLICE ClOTHING/EQUIF 305.08 22954 05/06/2002 PKKFT-REIMBURSEMENT: E 168.18 634513 636570 636613 634672 636688 632732 636662 633381 633434 100465 100467 100466 REIMBURSE 013823 Check Total 1,958.34 168.18 04/30/2002 PKM-FlEET REPAIR & MAIN 34.49 05/13/2002 MSFl T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 31.52 05/13/2002 PKM-FlEET REPAIR & MAIN 23.14 05/0112002 PKM-FlEET REPAIR & MAIN 22.69 05/13/2002 MSFl T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 100.38 04/1912002 MSFl T -REPAIR SUPPLIES 13.35 05/13/2002 PKM-FLEET REPAIR & MAIN -0.65 04/23/2002 MSFl T -REPAIR SUPPLIES 12.61 04/23/2002 MSFl T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 10.85 248.38 05/17/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC Cl 14.00 14.00 05/17/2002 PRCS:REFUND FOR REC Cl 14.00 14.00 04/30/2002 PS-POl YGRAPH EXAMS 750.00 750.00 04/18/2002 PKM-GD REPAIRIMAINT SUP 158.29 04/18/2002 PKM-GD REPAIRIMAINT SUP 85.06 243.35 05/15/2002 PRCS-COTTON CANDY SUG 93.60 93.60 05/17/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC Cl 14.00 14.00 . OS/2312002 MC-lODGING-GINA HOFFMA 373.47 373.47 05/0112002 AG01-128: DUMAS BAY REST 10,220.26 10,220.26 05/16/2002 PS-FRAMING SERVICES:DEP 61.13 61.13 Page: 13 apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 166804 05/31/2002 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 30914 04/24/2002 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT 189.64 Voucher: 166804 30751 04/19/2002 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 77.30 266.94 16680505/31/2002000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS IKON 05/30/2002 MSM&D-COPIER MAl NT SVC 1,537.43 Voucher: 166805 16641858 05/07/2002 MSDP-FAX MACHINES MAIN 179.67 1,717.10 166806 05/31/2002 002137 INLAND FOUNDRY COMPAN k 28197 05/02/2002 SWM-VANED GRATE 710.68 710.68 Voucher: 166806 16680705/31/2002005691 INLAND PACIFIC STAMPS & 452315 05/03/2002 CDB - RUBBER STAMPS & I 138.10 138.10 Voucher: 166807 166808 05/31/2002 005231 10S CAPITAL INC 54886600 04/22/2002 MSM&D-COPIER RENTAL 2,786.67 2,786.67 Voucher: 166808 166809 05/31/2002 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I B326878 04130/2002 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE S 1,025.24 1,025.24 Voucher: 166809 16681005/31/2002003718 JENKINS, HARDY & ASSOC, PMAY 2002 05116/2002 AG01-7: PUBLIC DEFENDER ~ 16,752.72 16,752.72 ~ Voucher: 166810 166811 05/31/2002000718 JENNINGS EQUIPMENT INC 095703 05/14/2002 MSFL T-KUBOTA MOWER RE 18.39 r- Voucher: 166811 095401 05/02/2002 MSFLT-KUBOTA MOWER RE 8.51 26.90 166812 05/31/2002 005656 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP 10663 F 05114/2002 PS-DETAIL SVCS # 139.00 Voucher: 166812 10654 F 0510612002 PS-DETAIL SVCS # 139.00 278.00 16681305/31/2002004486 JONES & JONES HR 4/15/02 04115/2002 MSHR-FW LOGO SHIRT ORD 306.49 306.49 Voucher: 166813 16681405/31/2002002010 KCM INC 136911 05/09/2002 AGO1-102B: MIRROR LKiFIS 39.48 39.48 Voucher: 166814 166815 05/31/2002 004397 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 20-2 05/01/2002 PWD-ENPR: TRUMAN HIGH S 816.17 816.17 Voucher: 166815 16681605/31/2002005956 KING COUNTY AUDITOR PS 5121/02 OS/21/2002 RECORDING FEES 20.00 20.00 Voucher: 166816 166817 05/31/2002 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV KC JAIL 11418 04128/2002 PS-KING CO JAIL{MONTH) 64,882.36 64,882.36 Voucher: 166817 16681805/31/2002005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI201091 05/01/2002 PWSCIP-MATERIALS/SUPPLI 248.09 24809 Voucher: 166818 16681905/31/2002003898 KING COUNTY RADIO 301251 04/30/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 4,297.50 4,29750 Voucher: 166819 16682005/31/2002000376 KING COUNTY WATER & LAN 2002-1 05/06/2002 #AG90-23D-UTILITY BILLING 14,422.89 14,422.89 Voucher: 166820 Page: 14 apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM Check # Date Vendor Final Check List Page: 15 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY (Continued) Inyoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 515100062298 04/16/2002 PWA-PRINTING SERVICES- 519.79 515100062425 04124/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 364.41 515100062475 04/26/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 326.40 515100062908 05122/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 258.40 515100062434 04/24/2002 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS 240.45 515100062315 04/17/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 183.60 515100062451 04/25/2002 MSA-PRINTING SERVICES- 96.83 515100062479 04/26/2002 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS 75.62 515100062508 04/29/2002 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS 40.80 515100062431 04/2412002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 31.55 515100061090 02/0112002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 26.63 515100062295 04/16/2002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 17.35 515100062420 04/24/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 16.32 515100062423 04/24/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 1,253.92 515100062395 04/23/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 11.41 3,463.48 515100062861 OS/21/2002 PWST-PRINTING SERVICES 446.52 515100062214 04/11/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES 219.85 515100062379 04/22/2002 PWST-PRINTING SERVICES 163.20 515100062378 04/22/2002 CDPL - COMP PLAN NOTICE 106.22 515100062520 04/30/2002 SWM/CIP-PRINTING SERVIC 81.63 515100062614 05/06/2002 SWM/CIP,PRINTING SERVIC 565.00 515100062764 05114/2002 CDB - PRINTING OF NEW-ST' 81.60 515100062443 04/25/2002 LAW-PRINTING SERVICES- 3.26 515100062478 04/26/2002 CDA - COPYING LARGE PLA 19.58 515100062648 05/07/2002 PWST-PRINTING SERVICES 11.42 515100062297 04/16/2002 PWSWR-PRINTING SERVIC 6.51 1,704.79 013794 05/14/2002 MILEAGE REIMB FOR KOCH~ 62.05 62.05 VOLUNTEER 04/24/2002 PS-VOLUNTEER RECOGNITI 915.56 915.56 Bank: key us bank 166821 05/31/2002000201 KINKO'S INC Voucher: 166821 ~ ..j 166822 05/31/2002 000201 KINKO'S INC Voucher: 166822 16682305/31/2002005064 KOCHMAR, LINDA Voucher: 166823 166824 05/31/2002 005322 LA QUINTA INN & SUITES Voucher: 166824 Page: 15 apChkLst 05/31/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Inyoice ~ ~ 16682505/31/2002 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI 3050801 Voucher: 166825 1768602 2926501 1639103 2961501 3075201 3238401 80406 101103 99902 2830801 2798301 3042401 2926402 166826 05/31/2002 004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP 04290212 Voucher: 166826 04290213 16682705/31/2002 003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF '218743 Voucher: 166827 218704 218367 59659 59845 59801 59879 16673 59723 59600 16674 16682905/31/2002 000874 MACHINERY COMPONENTS I 94488 Voucher: 166829 16683005/31/2002 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLP 00002621 Voucher: 166830 166831 05/31/2002 001234 MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX RO 9025-00M Voucher: 166831 16683205/31/2002 004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC 121580 Voucher: 166832 16682805/31/2002 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC Voucher: 166828 Inv Date Description 05/09/2002 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 05/09/2002 PKDBC-SEWER SERVICE AC 05109/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 05/09/2002 PKM-CITYHALL WATERISEWI 05/17/2002 PWS-WATER SERVICE 05/09/2002 PKCP-WATERISEWER SVCS 05/09/2002 PWS-WATER SERVICE 05/09/2002 PKRCS-WATERISEWER SVC 05/09/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 05109/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 05/14/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 05/14/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 05/17/2002 PWS-WATER SERVICE 05/09/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 04/29/2002 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 04/29/2002 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 05/02/2002 MSFL T-TIRES 05/02/2002 MSFL T-TIRES 04/26/2002 MSFLT-TIRE REPAIR 04/30/2002 PKCP-PLAYFIELD SAND- 05/1012002 PKM-STONElGRAVEL SUPPL 05/08/2002 SWM-WASTE MATERIAL DI 05110/2002 PWS-MEDIUM BARK- 04/19/2002 PKCP-PLAYFIELD SAND- 05103/2002 PWS-MEDIUM BARK- 04/24/2002 PWS-MEDIUM BARK- 04/19/2002 PKCP-PLAYFIELD SAND- 04/26/2002 MSFL T-RANSOME MOWER R . 04/30/2002 CD-EXPR: ENCHANTED PAR 04/30/2002 MSC-HEARING EXAMINER S 05/15/2002 PKM-PARKING LOT CLEANI Amount Paid 260.34 531.78 101.25 -34.09 79.59 62.08 51.91 19.40 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 8.91 142.89 83.44 57.72 13.06 34.12 327.28 237.97 124.37 1,097.72 63.91 10.75 35.97 21.31 1,338.46 868.56 660.00 47.60 Check Total 1,153.57 226.33 104.90 1,919.28 1,338.46 86856 660.00 47.60 Page: 16 apChkLst 05/31/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice ~ -t) 16683305/31/2002 006537 MERIDIAN CENTER ELECTRI 02-100845-00 Voucher: 166833 16683405/31/2002000286 METROCALL Voucher: 166834 166835 05/31/2002 001793 MICROFLEX INC Voucher: 166835 166836 05/31/2002 006540 MILLS, HARRY Voucher: 166836 16683705/31/2002 004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERN 4667 Voucher: 166837 16683805/31/2002 005145 MOBY'S WATER TRUCK SER 0204062 Voucher: 166838 16683905/31/2002 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE 32127 Voucher: 166839 16684005/31/2002 001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE ~754 JUN 2002 Voucher: 166840 762 JUN 2002 778 JUN 2002 770 JUN 2002 2353 JUN 02 166841 05/31/2002 000699 MUNICIPAL RESEARCH & SE 1769 Voucher: 166841 16684205/31/2002 004854 MURRAY, LARRY Voucher: 166842 16684305/31/2002 004445 NATIONAL SAFETY INC Voucher: 166843 16684405/31/2002 003566 NEAL, STEPHAN C Voucher: 166844 16684505/31/2002000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 138813 Voucher: 166845 138834 138731 138682 166846 05/31/2002 004701 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 0002682579-4 Voucher: 166846 3655475 00013591 02-47486 013780 0098933-IN 013828 Inv Date Description OS/20/2002 CDPL-REFUND 02-100845-00 04/27/2002 MSTEL-PAGER SERVICE 05/01/2002 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 05/14/2002 PW-EXP REVIEW REFUND 05/07/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES:FL Y 04/30/2002 PWSWR-VACUUM TRUCK S 04/28/2002 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S OS/29/2002 AG99-139: MUN COURT BLO OS/29/2002 AG98-212A: PS BLOGS LEAS OS/29/2002 AG98-212A: PS BLOGS LEAS OS/29/2002 AG98-212A: PS BLOGS LEAS OS/29/2002 AG93-51: KLCC PARKING LE 05/09/2002 MSGAC-ONLINE CREDIT CA 05/14/2002 PS-REIMB:BDU JACKETS:SR 05/09/2002 PKM-THUNDER 29 EAR MUFF 05/15/2002 PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM 04/25/2002 SWM-REP'AIR/MAINT SUPPL 04/25/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOUSUPPLIE 04/23/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 04/22/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 04/25/2002 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME Amount Paid 80.00 37.94 217.60 769.25 711.25 163.20 32.64 5,947.00 4,571.40 3,106.00 13,334.60 493.49 175.00 1,146.95 93.36 52.93 49.62 23.93 64.22 2.88 1,727.83 Check Total 80.00 37.94 217.60 769.25 711.25 163.20 32.64 27,452.49 175.00 1,146.95 93.36 52.93 140.65 1,727.83 Page: 17 apChkLst 05/31/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 16684705/31/2002001391 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC C 083842201 04/29/2002 PKCP-LiGHTING SUPPLIES Voucher: 166847 083914101 04/23/2002 PKCP-LiGHTING SUPPLIES 083914102 04/23/2002 PKCP-LiGHTING SUPPLIES 083881601 05/06/2002 PKM-LiGHTING SUPPLIES/I 084083200 05/08/2002 PKM-LiGHTING SUPPLIESII 16684805/31/2002005222 OAKSTONE WELLNESS PUB TOPSAFETY 02 OS/22/2002 MSRM-TOP SAFETY NEWSLE Voucher: 166848 16684905/31/2002 000891 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLA MAY 2002 Voucher: 166849 16685005/31/2002 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 005721 Voucher: 166850 006694 166851 05/31/2002 000034 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPA~416207074-01 Voucher: 166851 166852 05/31/2002 002545 PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC Voucher: 166852 16685305/31/2002 000112 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC Voucher: 166853 16685405/31/2002 004311 PACIFIC RIM RESOURCES I NNYD-2002-02 02/12/2002 PWSWR-PROMOTIONAL MA Voucher: 166854 166855 05/31/2002 004716 PACIFIC TRANSFER LLC Voucher: 166855 166856 05/31/2002 006536 PAK, JIM Voucher: 166856 166857 05/31/2002 006482 PALMER COKING COAL COM 2002570 Voucher: 166857 16685805/31/2002 006440 PAPE MACINERY INC Voucher: 166858 Check # Date Vendor Inyoice ~.. ~.. 70994 70996 70995 251622-1 MVGATVN 05 03-38315 2300128 2300035 2300054 2300033 166859 05/31/2002 005025 PCCI - PROFESSIONAL COMtv20280 Voucher: 166859 20281 16686005/31/2002 006534 PEARSON, FRAN 100798 Voucher: 166860 IllY Date Description 05/14/2002 LAW=OFFICE SUPPLIES 04/30/2002 PKCP-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 05/13/2002 SWM-REPAI RlMAI NT SUPPL 04/25/2002 PRCS-REC INC PROGRAM S 04/29/2002 PKCHBlPOWER OUTAGE;- 04/29/2002 PKCHBlPOWER OUTAGE;- 04/29/2002 PKCHBlPOWER OUTAGE;- 04/24/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 05/14/2002 PS-POLICE MOVING SVCS:A 05/13/2002 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 05/08/2002 PKM- 1/4" RED CINDER 05/09/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 04/14/2002 MSFLT-REPAIRIMAINT. SER 04/25/2002 MSFl T-Rt:PAIR/MAINT. SER 04/14/2002 MSFLT-REPAtR/MAINT. SER 05/01/2002 AGOO-51B: CHB JANITORIAL ~ 05/01/2002 AGOO-14B: KLCC JANITORIA OS/21/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC CL Amount Paid 204.11 344.09 166.27 35.48 135.06 972.22 103.00 262.71 48.92 32.35 522.24 261.12 290.35 130.95 11,500.00 1,210.00 50.00 89.97 805.13 59.30 727.28 94.66 1,797.00 915.00 14.00 Check Total 885.01 972.22 103.00 311.63 32.35 1,073.71 130.95 11,500.00 1,210.00 50.00 89.97 1,686.37 2,712.00 14.00 Page: 18 apChkLst 05/31/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Inyolce iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 166861 05/31/2002 000101 PETTY CASH 013858 OS/24/2002 CDL - WORKING LUNCH W/S 383.07 383.07 Voucher: 166861 16686205/31/2002002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MPKM 5/16/02 05/16/2002 PKM-FILM DEVELOPMENT 94.74 Voucher: 166862 013906 OS/28/2002 PKM-MILEAGE/L LEWIS 55.28 150.02 166863 05/31/2002 005235 PETTY CASH-CHANGE FUND 013905 OS/28/2002 MUNI COURT CHANGE FUND 67.20 67.20 Voucher: 166863 16686405/31/2002002822 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CEDBC-MAY 02 OS/23/2002 PKDBC-POSTAGE:MAIL BLU 103.83 103.83 Voucher: 166864 16686505/31/2002006161 PICKLEBALL STUFF 01678 05/1012002 PRCS-PICKLEBALLS- SENIO 29.38 29.38 Voucher: 166865 16686605/31/2002 003460 PIEL, ROBERT 013789 05/1512002 PS-REIMBURSE:FOOD:SWA 75.00 Voucher: 166866 013849 OS/21/2002 PS-POLICE EXPENSE REIMB 52.40 127.40 )\ 16686705/31/2002 001612 POLLARD GROUP INC 57124 04/29/2002 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS 173.48 '.:\ Voucher: 166867 51617368 04/30/2002 SWMWQ-PRINTING SERV 41.19 214.67 "" 166868 05/31/2002 001411 POSTAL EXPRESS iNC BM2204008 04/30/2002 MSM&D-MUN COURT POST 2,474.27 2,474.27 Voucher: 166868 16686905/31/2002006218 POTELCO, INC. 4043 05/09/2002 PWSCIP-WIRING INSTALLA 308.99 308.99 Voucher: 166869 16687005/31/2002005583 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC PC 764728 05/03/2002 PKM-FLINT SINGLES/STARG( 93.34 93.34 Voucher: 166870 166871 05/31/2002 000139 PSFOA-PUGET SND FINANC MSF-DUES 02/2812002 MSF-2002 PSFOA MEMBERS! 80.00 80.00 Voucher: 166871 Page: 19 apChkLst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM FinalCheck List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice ~. ~ - ? 16687305/31/2002000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 519-842-100- Voucher: 166873 221-220-200- 504-228-100- 345-200-200- 439-922-100- 398-842-100- 444-132-100- 980-132-100- 345-200-200- 534-132-100- 654-132-100- 888-389-100- 411-836-477- 669-650-200- 888-389-100- 128-255-394- 625-940-200- 458-148-100- 153-835-100- 744-132-100- 604-130-200- 141-467-100- 487 -650-200- 112-722-100- 925-940-200- 225-650-200- 250-275-038- 241-985-100- 483-657-329- 330-694-997- 644-132-100- 652-017-100- 733-930-200- 525-940-200- 934-132-100- Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 05/08/2002 PKM-CITY HALL ELECTRIC IT 2,820.98 05/1312002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.92 05/16/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 2,701.53 05/08/2002 PKCP-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 2,529.26 05/08/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 2,104.21 05/08/2002 PKRCS-ELECTRICITY/GAS C 1,311.35 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 1,207.66 05/15/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 1,047.95 05/09/2002 PKCP-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 512.15 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 405.15 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 388.40 03/11/2002 MC-MUNI CT ELECTRICITY C 359.25 05/16/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 338.20 05/13/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 310.38 05/10/2002 MC-MUNI CT ELECTRICITY C 296.46 05/08/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 274.40 05/0912002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 267.33 05/0612002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 233.04 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 231.56 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 228.01 05/08/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 217.35 05/06/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 193.88 05/13/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 193.16 05/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 182.98 05/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 177.14 05/08/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 177.04 05/03/2002 PWT. ELECTRICITY CHARGE 169.19 05/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 161.51 05/1712002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 161.11 05/1312002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 160.39 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 160.13 05/08/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 155.92 05/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 155.03 05/0712002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 152.98 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 145.42 Page: 20 apChkLst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice ~ IN ""~ 895-405-100- 233-930-200- 996-289-000- 373~087-100- 183-469-100- 720-429-100- 100-093-872- 168-847-100- 786-203-100- 497-198-100- 420-530-200- 177-437-100- 544-132-100- 252-150-200- 454-132-100- 886-203-100- 755-430-200- 472-400-100- 917-259-100- 889-288-100- 504-368-100- 017-470-540- 004-919-100- 733-829-100- 359-540-200- 170-120-200- 699-699-100- 303-218-100- 121-220-200- 413406 166874 05/31/2002 000602 PUGET SOUND INSTRUMEN Voucher: 166874 166875 05/31/2002 000533 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES 16700 Voucher: 166875 16678 166876 05/31/2002 005977 PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS I 31283 Voucher: 166876 Iny Date Description 05/14/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/09/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/06/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/16/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/03/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/02/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/0812002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 05/0812002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/0812002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/13/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/0612002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/0812002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 05/16/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/08/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS - 05/08/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/0312002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/16/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/03/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/0912002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/06/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/09/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 12/07/2001 PWSWM.ELECTRICITY CHA 05/03/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/13/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/07/2002 PWSWM-ELECTRICITY CHA 05/1712002 PWS-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/1612002 PKM-FACItITY ELECTRICITY 05/1012002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 05/14/2002 MSDP/PW - MOBILE RADIO R 05/13/2002 PKM-BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 05/06/2002 PKM-BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 05/1312002 PS-BOTTLED WATER SVC Amount Paid 136.53 135.70 123.08 121.66 118.61 114.30 110.43 109.73 105.35 102.56 100.79 99.10 98.83 98.12 95.98 94.92 83.67 74.05 61.54 44.86 38.76 33.81 32.02 28.87 26.12 8.61 6.18 6.04 5.92 81.38 675.09 119.13 391.68 Check Total 22,352.56 81.38 794.22 391.68 Page: 21 apChkLst 05/3112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 16687705/31/2002 004502 QC GRAPHICS INC Voucher: 166877 166878 05/31/2002 006483 QUEST DIAGNOSTIC INC Voucher: 166878 166879 05/31/2002 000202 QWEST Voucher: 166879 ()) \'.~ ..:c: Invoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 022504-FED 04/25/2002 MSFL T -PS VEH #649 GRAPHI 3,808.00 022304-FED 04/23/2002 MSFL T -PS VEH K-9 GRAPHIC 462.40 020805-FED 05108/2002 MSFL T-PS VEH #511 GRAPHI 1,558.56 5,828.96 2045927024 04/1712002 PS-PRE-EMP PHYSICAL EXA 214.35 214.35 157582 209062 MAY 6-9 TRAV 679454 PS 5/23/02 STMAL8/30/01 05/04/2002 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 4,595.91 05/16/2002 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 555.28 04/29/2002 MC-FAX MACHINE CHARGE 19.65 05/04/2002 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 64.64 05/16/2002 MSTEL-PHONEIDATA SVc 63.53 5,299.01 05/03/2002 MSRM-LiABILITY INSURANC 2,051.00 2,051.00 04/24/2002 PWSWM-CLOTHING; BOOTS 186.29 186.29 05/08/2002 PReS-REPAIRS MEN'S REST 228.48 228.48 04/24/2002 SWMM-FILM DEVELOPING; I 8.69 8.69 05/09/2002 AGOO-74B: TELECOMMUNICA 2,423.50 2,423.50 05/06/2002 PWSWR-TRAFFIC TECH; FL 1,104.17 1,104.17 05/09/2002 TRAVEL EXPENSES: NETWO 139.23 139.23 05/03/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 26.70 26.70 05/04/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 47.35 05/0412002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 41.53 88.88 05/01/2002 ps-POLlêE EQUIPMENT 5,735.00 5,735.00 OS/23/2002 PS-PARKING FEES:COURT:R 276.62 276.62 08/3012001 SWMCIP-PARKING LOT RE 3,018.11 3,018.11 206-Z04-0609 206-t02-8674 253-630-1529 253-815-9920 253-661-9833 16688005/31/2002002093 RALEIGH, SCHWARZ & POWE94629 Voucher: 166880 166881 05/31/2002003771 RED WING SHOE STORE Voucher: 166881 16688205/31/2002006442 RENT MY HONEY Voucher: 166882 16688305/31/2002004317 RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PH 1026056880 Voucher: 166883 16688405/31/2002004518 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATICFEB~5-APR30 Voucher: 166884 16688505/31/2002003469 ROAD WARRIORS INC 50603 Voucher: 166885 16688605/31/2002002807 SADRI, MEHDI Voucher: 166886 16688705/31/2002003726 SAFEWAY STORE #1555 Voucher: 166887 16688805/31/2002 005703 SAFEWAY STORE #3501 409341 Voucher: 166888 409340 16688905/31/2002003174 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPME548145 Voucher: 166889 16689005/31/2002006241 SCHROEDER, JEANNE Voucher: 166890 . 166891 05/31/2002701983 SEATAC MALL Voucher: 166891 Page: 22 apChkLst 05/3112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page; 23 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 16689205/31/2002701186 SEATTLE CENTRAL COMM C C1985R11284 Voucher: 166892 16689305/31/2002 000790 SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENC30446434 Voucher: 166893 16689405/31/2002003857 SECOMA GLASS COMPANY I 7011-1 Voucher: 166894 16689505/31/2002 000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC 205151028 Voucher: 166895 SELECT 166896 05/31/2002 005340 SENIOR SERVICES OF SEAT PRCS APRIL02 Voucher: 166896 16689705/31/2002001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY Voucher: 166897 502/6581 509/2691 516/8190 9852-3 G" rJ V\ 16689805/31/2002 001480 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO Voucher: 166898 16689905/31/2002002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC'110925 Voucher: 166899 110714 16690005/31/2002 000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTIS26474 Voucher: 166900 166901 05/31/2002 003340 SMITH PHD, DAVID H Voucher: 166901 166902 05/31/2002 00653~ SMITH, PEGGY S. Voucher: 166902 16690305/31/2002 006532 SMITH, RORY Voucher: 166903 16690405/31/2002006102 SOUND BUSINESS FORMS 127875 Voucher: 166904 16690505/31/2002 001618 SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW G 1050557 Voucher: 166905 1050466 1050584 16690605/31/2002002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 1-317273 Voucher: . 166906 1-317347 166907 05/31/2002 006527 S1. FRANCIS MENTAL HEAL T C2042R11285 Voucher: 166907 172 100468 100469 Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total OS/2112002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150.00 OS/28/2002 CM-SEATTLE pol NEWSPAPE 37.70 37.70 04/22/2002 PKKFT-REPLACE SKYLIGHT 1,355.65 1,355.65 05/15/2002 PS-AIRFARE: JIM LINDSAY 505.50 05/10/2002 PS-VOLUNTEER RECOGNITI 300.00 805.50 05/13/2002 PRCS-SENIOR LUNCH PROG 421.00 421.00 05/02/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 27.81 05/09/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 27.81 05/16/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 27.81 83.43 05/03/2002 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES 140.52 140.52 05114/2002 SWMM-MAINT. SUPPLIES; T 568.45 0510612002 SWMCIP-MAINT. CONCRETE 366.19 934.64 05/02/2002 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 371.74 371.74 05/06/2002 PS-PRE-EMPLOY PSYCH EVP 2,250.00 2,250.00 05/17/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC CL 4.45 4.45 05/17/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC CL 100.00 100.00 04/30/2002 LAW-SUBPOENA WINDOW E 72.84 72.84 05/09/2002 PS-WIND$HIELD REPAIR 317.25 04/23/2002 PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR 331.87 05/14/2002 MSFL T-VEHICLE WINDOW R 230.33 879.45 05/06/2002 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC 92.48 05/0612002 PKM-PEST CONTROL SVCS 89.22 181.70 OS/21/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150.00 Page: 23 apChkLst 05/31/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 24 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 16690805/31/2002 006242 STEPHENS EQUIPMENT MAl 776 Voucher: 166908 16690905/31/2002003307 STERICYCLE INC 000 Voucher: 166909 16691005/31/2002 005921 STL SEATTLE, SEVERN TREN58003774 Voucher: 166910 58003539 58003675 983 166911 05/31/2002 701080 STUDIO EAST Voucher: 166911 166912 05/31/2002 005891 SUDDEN IMAGE INC Voucher: 166912 16q9j3 05/31/2002 004356 SUMPTER, KYLE : Voucher: 166913 166~4 05/31/2002 006213 SUNBEL T RENTALS Voucher: 166914 16691505/31/2002000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE Voucher: 166915 16691605/31/2002 002176 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCT Voucher: 166916 16691705/31/2002000432 TAYLOR RENTAL Voucher: 166917 16691805/31/2002003085 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION 857009 Voucher: 166918 16691905/31/2002 004218 TIMCO INC 77415 Voucher: 166919 16692005/31/2002 005059 TIRE DISPOSAL & RECYCLIN 53221 Voucher: 166920 166921 05131/2002003694 TODD ROBINSON PAINTING 1100275 Voucher: 166921 16692205/31/2002 005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 8715985 Voucher: 166922 16692305/31/2002 006526 TOTAL LIVING CONCEPT Voucher: 166923 16692405/31/2002003869 TOTAL RECLAIM INC Voucher: 166924 (j) t 0001600907 2618 013790 26722 26723 UNIT A-8 4632203 4632204 1-193564-15 77415 C2092R11283 4629 Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 01/31/2002 SWMCIP-MISC. LABOR; MA 300.00 300.00 04/30/2002 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 10.86 10.86 05/16/2002 SWMWQ-LABORATORY TE 540.00 05/02/2002 SWMWQ-LABORA TORY TE 140.00 05/09/2002 SWMWQ-LABORA TORY TE 270.00 950.00 05/10/2002 PKKFT- PERFORMANCE:MA 1,300.00 1,300.00 05/09/2002 PS-PHOTO SERVICES 1,226.76 1,226.76 05/15/2002 PS-REIM:GLOCK PISTOL SUF 75.00 75.00 05/13/2002 PWS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL; E 579.94 05/13/2002 PWS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL; 3 440.52 1,020.46 05/09/2002 PS-MTHL Y STORAGE RENTA 165.00 165.00 05103/2002 PKM-SPECIAL TY SCREWS/PI 131.07 05103/2002 PKM-SPECIAL TY SCREWS/PI 27.07 158.14 04/26/2002 PKRCS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL 140.35 140.35 05/16/2002 PS-TRAFFIC SCHOOL- MEDI 3,371.71 3,371.71 04/18/2002 SWMCIP-MAINT SUPPLIES; ~ 65.46 65.46 04127/2002 PWSWR-RECYCLING SERV 469.50 469.50 04/18/2002 PKDBC/KFT - MISC PAINTIN 3,475.20 3,475.20 05/06/2002 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 105.09 105.09 05121/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 68.43 68.43 05106/2002 PWSWR-RECYCLING SERV 2,585.00 2,585.00 Page: 24 apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 25 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 16692505/31/2002001436 TREE RECYCLERS Voucher: 166925 166926 05/31/2002 003204 TRUCKERS SUPPLY INC Voucher: 166926 16692705/31/2002001715 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN Voucher: 166927 ~ !J Invoice 20513 980749 164076 164070 164075 164079 164073 164074 164078 164072 164068 164069 164071 048 166928 05/31/2002 000065 US POSTMASTER Voucher: 166928 166929 05/31/2002 006520 US TREASURY. C/O WA STA10559 Voucher: 166929 166930 05/31/2002 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 67100 Voucher: 166930 71222 166931 05/31/2002 000618 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SU 7924786 Voucher: 166931 166932 05/31/2002 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Voucher: 166932 0000F6588V18 0000F6588V17 0000F80F4817 166933 05/31/2002 000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO I 5450107 Voucher: 166933 5451522 5453192 Iny Date Description 05/13/2002 PKM-REMOVE DEAD TREES 05/10/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 05102/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/0212002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/0212002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM~PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 05/02/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS OS/24/2002 MSMD-PO BOX ANNUAL FEE 05/13/2002 PS-Doc #0559 Stock #1 005-00 04/19/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 05/17/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 05/03/2002 PKM-CUSTOM DRY BLEND F 05/04/2002 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 04/27/2002 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 04/27/2002 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 04/30/2002 PKM-SKATE PARK IRRIGAT 04/30/2002 PKM- SAG'HALIE IRRIGATION 04/30/2002 PKM-SKATE PARK IRRIGAT Amount Paid 424,32 6.47 569,02 55.49 353,60 244,80 239,36 125,12 118,59 106,62 96,83 89,22 58,75 750,00 3,868,70 62,70 15,39 605.47 26.53 3,02 7,34 422.43 80,90 65.43 Check Total 424,32 6.47 2,057.40 750,00 3,868,70 78,09 605.47 36,89 568,76 Page: 25 apChkLst 0513112002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 26 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Inyoice ()) ~ 16693405/31/2002005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE25560365-001 Voucher: 166934 25559342-001 25561595-001 25292027-001 25452019-001 25019786-002 25707110-001 16693505/31/2002003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C200460 Voucher: 166935 200249 200346 166936 05/31/2002 004863 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION SU 0409660 Voucher: 166936 16693705/31/2002001124 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLE 1004-652615 Voucher: 166937 166938 05/31/2002 002547 W W GRAINGER INC Voucher: 166938 16693905/31/2002003528 WA STATE CRIMINALJUSTI Voucher: 166939 16694005/31/2002000340 WA STATE-INFORMATION S 2002040217 Voucher: 166940 166941 05/31/2002000253 WA STATE-TRANSPORTATI Voucher: 166941 753-887372-5 755-227933-8 2011-3 Iny Date Description 05/16/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 05/16/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 05/15/2002 PWSWM-CIPlEQPMT RENT 05/03/2002 PWSWM-CIPlEQPMT RENT 05/10/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 04/19/2002 PWSWM-CIP/EQPMT RENT OS/2112002 PWSWM-CIP/EQPMT RENT 05/14/2002 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 03/25/2002 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 04/2512002 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 05/10/2002 PWS-MAINT. SUPPLIES; 6' X . 05/05/2002 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 05/08/2002 PKM-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIE 05/14/2002 PKM-HOUSEHOLDSUPPLIE 05/14/2002 PS-FIREARMS HANDGUN IN 04/30/2002 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE RE313ATB2051 05/14/2002 PWSCIP-PROJECT MGMT.; P RE313ATB1121 12/11/2001 PWSCIP-PROJECT MGMT., P ATB20409084 04/09/2002 AG90-7A: WSDOT MAINTENA RE313ATB2051 05/14/2002 PWSCIP-PROJECT MGMT.; P 16694205/31/2002 000537 WACE-WA ASSOC CODE EN WAGE-DUES OS/23/2002 CDB - WAGE ANNUAL DUESt: Voucher: 166942 16694305/31/2002000732 WASPC-WA ASSOC SHERIF DUESOO050900 05/01/2002 PS-WASPC MAY DUES: BRI Voucher: 166943 166944 05/31/2002 000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT Voucher: 166944 16694505/31/2002 005392 WAYNE INVESTIGATIONS Voucher: 166945 16694605/31/2002005565 WELCOME COMMUNICATIO 1852 Voucher: 166946 1872 601-0000757- 04/27/2002 PWSWR-lITTER DISPOSAL 0013680-1055 05/01/2002 PWSWR-LiTTER DISPOSAL 0018 05/1712002 AGOO-79B: LEGAL PROCESS 05/15/2002 MSDP/PS NEXTEL 11000R B OS/21/2002 MSDP/PK CELLPHONE BAT Amount Paid 236.66 293.31 141.85 60.13 66.96 63.32 60.13 160,436.00 630.00 630.00 24.80 839.98 747.81 163.89 50.00 1,213.07 972.71 228.32 9,776.23 192.69 80.00 75.00 6,653.25 330.70 220.00 52.51 29.59 Check Total 922.36 161,696.00 24.80 839.98 911.70 50.00 1,213.07 11,169.95 80.00 75.00 6,983.95 220.00 82.10 Page: 26 apChkLst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 27 Bank: key us bank (Continued) \)\ N '-C C~ Date Vendor Inyolce 16694705/31/2002000173 WEST PUBLISHING CORPOR¡801809186 Voucher: 166947 16694805/31/2002000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DIS 280764 Voucher: 166948 16694905/31/2002 001990 WESTERN LlNENIWELCOME 1113/0500 Voucher: 166949 16695005/31/2002000619 WESTERN POWER & EQUIP J32873 Voucher: 166950 16695105/31/2002001427 WESTERN POWER & EQUIP J31134 Voucher: 166951 16695205/31/2002002087 WHITMAN GLOBAL CARPET (20475 Voucher: 166952 16695305/31/2002 002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY Voucher: 166953 24-109319 24-108143 24-109434 16695405/31/2002 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 1425 Voucher: 166954 1442 16695505/31/2002 003109 WOODSTONE CREDIT UNI 2002-04 Voucher: 166955 2002-05 16695605/31/2002000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY 1144776 Voucher: 166956 16695705/31/2002 005697 WORK-SPORTS & OUTDOOR 1668 Voucher: 166957 16695805/31/2002701265 WRPA 2800 Voucher: 166958 16695905/31/2002 000375 WSBA-WA STATE BAR ASSO 5/23/02 WSBA Voucher: 166959 16696005/31/2002001121 WWEE-WA WOMEN EMPLO WWEE-JRT Voucher: 166960 WWEE CAPCD 166961 05/31/2002 005722 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMEIAPRIL 2002 Voucher: 166961 16696205/31/2002 000947 YOUR INC Voucher: 166962 2800 2788 2790 2787 Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 04/30/2002 MSDP-DATABASE ACCESS S 772.19 772.19 04/22/2002 MSFL T-TORO MOWER REPA 920.76 920.76 04/22/2002 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL 81.10 81.10 05/16/2002 PWS-MISC. EQUIPMENT; TA 103.24 103.24 04/17/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLlE$ 26.89 26.89 05/13/2002 AG98-203C: CARPET CLEANI 789.89 789.89 05/01/2002 SWMM-LANDSCAPE MAINT 387.11 04/03/2002 SWMM-MAINT. SUPPLIES; C 47.87 05/01/2002 SWMM-LANDSCAPE MAINT 40.80 475.78 04/20/2002 PS-FIRING RANGE USE 108.50 04/28/2002 PS-FIRING RANGE USE 95.21 203.71 04/05/2002 PS-LEASE CONTRACT 1,792.00 05/05/2002 PS-LEASE CONTRACT 1,792.00 3,584.00 05/14/2002 SWMCIP-HOTMIX, COMMERC 186.45 186.45 04/27/2002 SWMM-CLOTHING; (2) CAR 385.33 385.33 05/13/2002 PRCS-WRPA TEEN WORKSH 15.00 15.00 OS/23/2002 LAW-9TH ANNUAL WSBA EM 162.11 162.11 03/31/2002 HUMAN SERVICES PROGRM 4,176.50 03/31/2002 HUMAN SERVICES PROGRM 1,500.00 5,676.50 05/08/2002 PS-JAIL SERVICES 12,335.86 12,335.86 OS/20/2002 AG99-28B: PS JANITORIAL S 1,575.00 OS/20/2002 AGOO-15B: MUN CRT JANITO 660.00 OS/20/2002 AGOO-48B: PKM JANITORIAL: 650.00 2,885.00 - Page: 27 co N ;,; C) 1'0 n. >- ~ ø...l :::¡~ ""'W u C "W <311.. -11.. ~ 0 ü:~ õ :¡; n. M N ~ <:'! N - 0 II) 0 ...IN "'" - .s;;:~ Ot? c.U) 1'00 '" ": ": ;'õ- .". ": 00 N Q; 0> '" D... ,;¿ r:: 1'0 .c II) ::J .2 ëii Š .c ::J <f) biD apChkLst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 29 264 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 714,517.75 (j> \N Page: 29 apChkLst 05131/2002 1 :34:23PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 30 Bank code: key Check # Date 166729 õ5i3Ti2002 166872 05/31/2002 ~ \"' Page: 30 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 ~ ~ Bank: key us bank ~ Date ~ 16696306/14/2002000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I Voucher: 166963 16696406/14/2002000385 ACCOUNTEMPS Voucher: 166964 16696506/14/2002001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORJ386086 Voucher: 166965 16696606/14/2002 003443 ACTION TARGET, INC 8428-1 Voucher: 166966 16696706/14/2002 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 12915 Voucher: 166967 12909 16696806/14/2002 002899 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INCOOOOO04-1 Voucher: 166968 0000004-2 16696906/14/2002003141 AIR EMISSIONS 20508 Voucher: 166969 16697006/1412002001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-486 Voucher: 166970 16697106/14/2002 005614 AMB TOOLS & EQUIPMENT C 256468 Voucher: 166971 16697206/14/2002005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6416 Voucher: 166972 166973 06/14/2002 000721 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC Voucher: 166973 Inyoice 0044816-1 0661737-1 07475992 8428-1 TM-48659 0080365 0080183 0080145 0080087 0080264 0080322 1835905 16697406/14/2002 003269 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTE Voucher: 166974 16697506/14/2002 006545 ANDERSON, JANA MARIE 1000391 Voucher: 166975 Iny Date Description 05/30/2002 LAW-MAY MONTHLY SRV. C 05/15/2002 LAW-MAY MONTHLY SRV. C OS/21/2002 TEMP FINANCE OFFICE STA 05/31/2002 AGOO-6B: STREET SWEEPIN 05/31/2002 PS-PT DUELING TREE PACK! OS/29/2002 PWS-SECURITY; PADLOCK, ( OS/23/2002 PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 03/28/2002 CD-ENPR: HERITAGE WOOD 03/28/2002 CD-ENPR: MERIDIAN CT Mm 05/18/2002 MSFL T-VEH#020 EMISSION T 05/10/2002 PWT-MISC. SUPPLIES; 12" X: OS/22/2002 PKM-GENERATOR REPAIR 06/01/2002 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 05/30/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK OS/22/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK OS/21/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 05117/2002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS OS/24/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK OS/29/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 05/14/2002 PKKFT-To'OL STORAGE UNI OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 Amount Paid 96.00 5.00 1,230.80 2,961.20 260.00 74.93 55.95 438.44 363.61 362.36 107.71 144.31 131.00 344.08 509.73 337.28 8.16 311.44 247.52 682.32 28.76 Check Total 101.00 1,230.80 2,961.20 260.00 130.88 802.05 362.36 107.71 144.31 131.00 1,758.21 682.32 28.76 Page: 1 apChkLst 06114/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 166977 06/14/2002 003649 ARBUTHNOT, STEVEN Voucher: 166977 16697806/14/2002 005715 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IL6163838F Voucher: 166978 16697906/14/2002 000004 ASSOC OF WASHINGTON CI 013916 Voucher: 166979 16698006/14/2002 006593 ASTLE, JOSEPH Voucher: 166980 . 166981-06/14/2002004669 AT&T BROADBAND . Voucher: 166981 166982'06/14/2002 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE Voucher: 166982 16698306/14/2002 006546 AUDED, PAIRLEE A Voucher: 166983 166984 06/14/2002 006595 AVENA, JOSIE Voucher: 166984 16698506/14/2002006600 BAHAI'S OF FEDERAL WAY C2079R11394 Voucher: 166985 16698606/14/2002001604 BALL, GIGI Y CAO015597 Voucher: 166986 16698706/14/2002002386 BANHEGYI/ PAWLAK, SUSAN PROBATION Voucher: 166987 CA22673FW 16698806/14/2002 000792 BARRY'S TRUCKING & LAND 67440 Voucher: 166988 67441 16698906/14/2002 006547 BAXTER, CAROLE A 1000887 Voucher: 166989 Check # Date Vendor 16697606/14/2002 005501 ANDREWS, AMY Voucher: 166976 ~ w -C Inyoice CA24506 CA23818 CA15991FW CA23535 - CA13395FW 013618 101756 849834016 051 0645149 0510714612 050 532 0955 051 066 1494 051 0691538 0584948549 1000588 101757 CAO015597 Iny Date Description OS/28/2002 MC-INTERPRETERCA# OS/21/2002 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 05/15/2002 DC-INTERPRETERCA# 05/14/2002 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 05/03/2002 DC-INTERPRETERCA# 04/24/2002 PS-REIMB:CIS CLOTHING AL Amount Paid 100.00 70.00 40.00 70.00 40.00 275.00 Check Total 320.00 275.00 1,195.11 765.00 55.00 75.43 166.29 24.38 65.00 150.00 35.00 262.50 897.60 25.84 06/01/202 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE 05/30/2002 AWC CONF REG FOR GATE 1,195.11 765.00 05131/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC CL 55.00 OS/27/2002 MSGAC-DMX MUSIC SVC (F 75.43 05/15/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV OS/24/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV OS/25/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV OS/28/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 05/15/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 05/13/2002 MSTEL-LONGÐISTANCE SV OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 65.66 24.66 18.18 21.43 18.18 18.18 24.38 05/31/2002 PRCS-REFUND FOR REC CL 65.00 06/05/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 06/04/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 35.00 05/13/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 04/29/2002 MC-INTERPRETERCA# OS/28/2002 PKM-REMOVE/HAUL DEBRIS OS/28/2002 PKM-DIG OUT & REPAIR MA OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 157.50 105.00 799.68 97.92 25.84 Page: 2 apChkLst 0611412002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 166990 06/14/2002 002945 BEVERLY'S HAPPY KEYBOAR 13983 Voucher: 166990 166991 06/14/2002005098 BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO ~249010 Voucher: 166991 248663 248851 1001228 (? ~ V'I 16699206/14/2002006548 BLANCHARD, JAMES A Voucher: 166992 16699306/14/2002 004977 BLiMPIE SUBS & SALADS Voucher: 166993 16699406/14/2002 005795 BLUE RHINO/CARIBOU PROP,013968 Voucher: 166994 16699506/14/2002 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 1248080 Voucher: 166995 246956-01 247428 232357 247437 248774 239084 248750 237382-80 247443-80 249459 249223 248275 239086-80 1001407 013915 16699606/14/2002 006549 BOWEN, CHERYL LEE Voucher: 166996 16699706/14/2002 002432 BRAVO PUBLICATIONS INC 30033 Voucher: 166997 16699806/14/2002 004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP 003847 Voucher: 166998 003884 003833 1001754 16699906/14/2002 006550 BUFF, H LEILANI Voucher: 166999 ~ Description 06/05/2002 PKKFT - PIANO TUNING/REP¡ 06/04/2002 PS-REPAIRS # OS/23/2002 PS-REPAIRS # 05/30/2002 PS-REPAIRS # OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 05/30/2002 CM-FOOD FOR MUNICIPAL F 05/12/2002 PWSWR-RECYCLING EVEN OS/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/21/2002 PS.UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/20/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 03/05/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/22/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/21/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 03/1812002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/24/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/20/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/30/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/23/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 05/30/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/21/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING OS/29/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING . OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 05/30/2002 PKKFT- A~VERTISING:EVEN 05/31/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 06/06/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS OS/29/2002 MSFLT.REPAIR/MAINT SVCS OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 Amount Paid 205.00 16.85 624.22 16.81 24.38 69.23 270.00 352.35 269.61 204.44 154.39 143.51 141.39 100.00 1,535.51 98.95 -94.66 86.99 71.75 21.22 6.96 27.30 540.00 497.03 266.51 382.44 22.92 Check Total 205,00 657.88 24.38 69.23 270.00 3,092.41 27.30 540.00 1,145.98 22.92 Page: 3 apChkLst 06114/2002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Inyoice <? ~ <' 16700006/14/2002000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 5741 Voucher: .167000 5751 5744 5745 5801 5740 5749 5747 5742 5750 5737 5748 5800 5728 5752 5739 5774 5812 5738 5729 5743 5799 5775 5769 5722 5786 5785 5723 5794 5770 5746 5736 5753 5768 Iny Date Description 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/31/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06103/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/31/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/31/2002 PKDBC-CÄTERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA OS/23/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/07/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06103/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/14/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/31/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA OS/22/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/14/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA OS/29/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA OS/29/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/14/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 05/31/2002 PKDBC-GATERING SVCS DA OS/22/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 06/03/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA OS/22/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA Amount Pal.d 1,065.88 852.25 748.20 676.80 531.48 521.26 488.16 426.00 397.80 357.60 357.60 285.60 254.60 236.40 228.60 224.71 223.38 203.29 191.59 176.80 160.92 1,18930 126.90 30.60 124.20 107.10 101.52 91.80 78.20 68.00 53.64 53.64 47.60 35.76 Check Total 10,717.18 Page: 4 apChkLst 06114/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 167001 06/14/2002002036 CASCADIA CONSULTING GR KCC2002-FW Voucher: 167001 167002 06/14/2002 700797 CASHMAN. THOMAS J Voucher: 167002 167003 06/14/2002 005712 CHANG. JENNY Voucher: 167003 Check # Date Vendor Inyoice 1002182 CAO024656 IAO059329 CA12905FW 16700406/14/2002000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE 1905 Voucher: 167004 1908-9 1908 1908-8 443103 C? j 167005 06/14/2002 003564 CLARY. JOHN Voucher: 167005 167006 06/14/2002 005507 CLIFTON. THOMASE Voucher: 167006 167007 06/14/2002003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA Voucher: 167007 Iny Date Description OS/22/2002 PWSWR-PROMOTION SVC OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 OS/2812002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 05/17/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 05/03/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 05/16/2002 PS-TRAVEL EXP (CON F) (DA OS/20/2002 PS-TRAVEL EXPIWASPCCm 05/16/2002 PS-TRAVEL EXP(CONF) (DA OS/20/2002 PS-TRAVEL EXP (CONF) (DA OS/29/2002 PS-REIMBURSËK-9 EXPENSI APR29-MAY20 OS/2012002 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES t1071442 T1071184 w1067928 T1062930-2 MAY 2002 167008 06/14/2002 005208 COMMERCIAL CARD SERVI Voucher: 167008 16700906/14/2002005300 COMPAQ CORPORATION 32155278 Voucher: 167009 16701006/14/2002002863 COMPLETE COLLISION CEN 3159 Voucher: 167010 3160 3408 3161 3425 OS/22/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE OS/23/2002 PKRLS~JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 05/15/2002 MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLlES- 05/14/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 05/31/2002 CITY PRO-CARD MAY 2002 05/31/2002 MSDP - GIS VIDEO CARDS- 03/19/2002 MSFL T-PS 2002 MOTORCYCl 03/19/2002 MSFL T-PS 2002 MOTORCYCl OS/29/2002 MSRM-PS VEH 2001 FOR CR 04/11/2002 MSFL T-PS 2002 MOTORCYCl OS/24/2002 PS-VEHICtE REPAIR/PAINTI Amount Paid 12,000.00 25.84 70.00 35.00 61.25 173.20 106.60 649.12 106.60 499.56 560.00 81.33 70.59 17.63 33.16 4,510.83 443.90 1,593.92 1,593.92 2,218.97 1,593.92 169.37 Check Total 12,000.00 25.84 166.25 1,035.52 . 499.56 560.00 202.71 4,510.83 443.90 7,170.10 Page: 5 apChkLst 0611412002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Invoice 167011 06/14/2002 000063 CÒRPORATE EXPRESS OFF 32811186 Voucher: 167011 32883666 33029630 32597392 33160838 32730312 33042573 33072089 0002-0937 16701506/14/2002 004273 DAY, JEFFREY K Voucher: 167015 16701606/14/2002006156 DESTINATION WIRELESS 7366 Voucher: 167016 16701706/14/2002 005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA CA23818FW Voucher: 167017 CA23535 CA24506 IA641 03 CA24856 1003640 (j) \;fI ~ 16701206/14/2002 000771 COSTCO/HRS USA Voucher: 167012 16701306/14/2002 000475 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTE Voucher: 167013 16701406/14/2002 003472 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS I Voucher: 167014 16701806/14/2002 006551 DORAGE, JOSEPH J Voucher: 167018 16701906/14/2002 006552 DORVAL, MARILYN S Voucher: 167019 16702006/14/2002 005842 DPK INC Voucher: 167020 167021 06/14/2602 006553 DUNAHOE, JOSHUA WARRE Voucher: 167021 229624 229522 22654 22646 117156 MAY212002 1003653 12-AG01-63A 1003747 .~ Description 05/13/2002 PKA-OFFICE SUPPLY 05/09/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES OS/21/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 05/03/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI OS/24/2002 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES- 05/09/2002 PKM-CIP-OFFICE SUPPLIES/ 05/15/2002 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLlES- OS/22/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES- OS/26/2002 MSF-(NOVOOIDECOO)SUPPLI OS/20/2002 PKCHB-ALARM MONITORIN OS/20/2002 PKRLS-ALARM MONITORING 05/10/2002 PS-RADIO REPAIR # 05/10/2002 PS-RADIO REPAIRS/MAl NT 05/17/2002 PS-RADIO REPAIR # OS/2112002 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENDER SV OS/21/2002 MSFL T-PS VEH#649/EQUIP I OS/21/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 05/14/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# OS/28/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 05/17/2002 MC-I NTERPRETER:CA# 06/04/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 OS/24/2002 AG01-63Ã:23RD AVE S ROW,., OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 Amount Paid 84.20 6502 58.00 33.89 33,28 28.85 214.51 10.09 861.41 103.00 59.74 482.14 397.28 471.23 150.00 554.85 100.00 80.00 140.00 80.00 80.00 25.84 24.38 203,189.75 25.84 Check Total 527.84 861.41 162.74 1,350.65 150.00 554.85 480.00 25.84 24.38 203,189.75 25.84 Page: 6 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description AmountPaid 16702206/14/2002 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11019191 06/04/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 141.57 Voucher: 167022 1019072 OS/28/2002 PS~REPAIR SERVICES 166.46 1019087 OS/29/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 83.98 1018985 OS/23/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 12.75 1018989 OS/2312002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES 74.09 167023 06/14/2002 006554 ECKART, DOUGLAS W 1003858 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 24.38 Voucher: 167023 16702406/14/2002 006555 EDWARDS, JAMES 1003887 05124/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 20.00 Voucher: 167024 16702506/14/2002001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI5428527 OS/25/2002 PS-CREDIT REPORTS 50.21 Voucher: 167025 16702606/14/2002 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0103976 05/31/2002 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 4,091.16 Voucher: 167026 0103975 05/31/2002 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 2,134.38 0102916 05/15/2002 MSFL T-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 2,236.09 16702706/14/2002 004840 EVAC-EMERGENCYVEHICLE 101034 OS/23/2002 MSFLT-PS VEH#649IEQUIP I 2,01365 ~ Voucher: 167027 101036 OS/23/2002 MSFL T-PS VEH#649/EQUIP I 1,996.18 "'~ 101037 OS/23/2002 MSFLT-PS VEH#649/EQUIP I 2,013.65 ~ 101040 05123/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 47.74 16702806/14/2002001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR 002982 06/03/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 32.50 Voucher: 167028 002983 06/03/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 32.50 002981 05/31/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 637.54 002985 06/03/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 32.50 16702906/14/2002 001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 037020 05/15/2002 AG01-52:DBC LANDSCAPE S 1,933.38 Voucher: 167029 16703006/14/2002000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-225-65807 OS/24/2002 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES 38.35 Voucher: 167030 167031 06/14/2002000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO1395 05119/2002 CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP FO 425.00 Voucher: 167031 . 167032 06/14/2002 000285 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPART 013991 05/31/2002 REMIT FIRE DEPT FEES 150.00 Voucher: 167032 16703306/14/2002 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 003925 05/15/2002 LAW-NEWSPAPER ADS- 174.48 Voucher: 167033 003869 05/04/2002 CDPL-NOTICE: 122.50 003861 05/01/2002 CDPL-NOTICE: 122.50 167034 06/14/2002 004302 FEDERAL WAY NEWS 013708 05/03/2002 CDA - ANNUAL FED WAY NE 24.00 Voucher: 167034 Check Total 478.85 24.38 20.00 50.21 8,461.63 6,071.22 735.04 1,933.38 38.35 425.00 150.00 419.48 24.00 Page: 7 apChkLst 0611412002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Invoice Iny Date Description G) ~ ÇI 16703506/14/2002004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION S 0531 FWPDMAY 05/31/2002 PS-LUNCH:OFFICER PATRO Voucher: 167035 16703606/14/2002001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIS SIF-MAY 2002 05/31/2002 MSF-REMIT IMPACT FEES F Voucher: 167036 16703706/14/2002006582 FEDERAL WAY mACK CLUB YOUTH SPORT 06/10/2002 PS-ADVI 6/29 YOUTH SPORT Voucher: 167037 16703806/14/2002006556 FELLOWS, DANIELLE M Voucher: 167038 16703906/14/2002005213 FIFE PRINTING Voucher: 167039 16704006/14/2002 004910 FILETEX LLC Voucher: 167040 167041 06/14/2002000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY 037033 Voucher: 167041 167042 06/14/2002 003201 FLAG FACTORY NORTHWES 3233 Voucher: 167042 16704306/14/2002 002664 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC 38956 Voucher: 167043 16704406/14/2002 004366 FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPAN20174 Voucher: 167044 16704506/14/2002 006557 FORD, MICHAEL E Voucher: 167045 16704606/14/2002701718 FURUMOTO, ANE SACHIE 1004652 Voucher: 167046 16704706/14/2002 000738 G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY Voucher: 167047 16704806/14/2002006599 G L GRIFFIN CO INC 02-10337-00 Voucher: 167048 02-10339-00 16704906/14/2002004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC38027 Voucher: 167049 38445 16705006/14/2002003118 GALL'S INC 55718340 Voucher: 167050 557183170101 167051 06/14/2002 006558 GALLAGHER, MICHEAL J 1004678 Voucher: 167051 1004215 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 14479 05/17/2002 MC-PRINTING SERVICES 05/17/2002 CDA - LASERPRINT COLOREI 02-745 OS/20/2002 PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER OS/23/2002 PKM-FACILITIES FLAGS OS/23/2002 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVC 05/06/2002 PKM-METAL TO REPAIR BA 1004451 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 104258 04/10/2002 PKM-RAINWEAR/J MOHAME 06/05/2002 CDB-REFUND ELEC PERMIT 06/05/2002 èDB-REFUND ELEC PERMIT OS/21/2002 MSFLT-R!:PAIR SUPPLIES 05/30/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES OS/21/2002 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF OS/21/2002 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 Amount Paid Check Total 172.05 172.05 13,080.00 13,080.00 50.00 50.00 21.46 21.46 215.37 215.37 48.31 48.31 14.65 14.65 3,513.42 3,513.42 308.40 308.40 112.80 112.80 24.38 24.38 24.38 24.38 21.74 21.74 337.80 320.85 658.65 17.09 12.70 29.79 354.33 10,76 365.09 25.84 25.84 Page: 8 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Invoice (j\ ""- 167052 06/14/2002 004666 GARKAVI, EMMA Voucher: 167052 16705306/14/2002000117 GFOA-GOV'T FINANCE OFFI 7/2002 CONF Voucher: 167053 16705406/14/2002006559 GIBSON, NYLA J Voucher: 167054 16705506/14/2002001992 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS Voucher: 167055 16705606/14/2002003831 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES 02-006 Voucher: 167056 167057 06/14/2002 006560 HAGBERG, ARTHUR M Voucher: 167057 16705806/14/2002006480 HARRINGTON CONST Voucher: 167058 16705906/14/2002003841 HEAD-QUARTERS PTS Voucher: 167059 16706006/14/2002003365 HEAVENER, DONOVAN Voucher: 167060 167061 06/14/2002006521 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 13564700-001 Voucher: 167061 3459827-001 16706206/14/2002002477 HOME DEPOT 1011781 Voucher: 167062 1361983 3030982 2011602 9030301 6020082 16706306/14/2002006481 HONOLULU MEDICAL GROUP013939 Voucher: 167063 16706406/14/2002003210 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 4566 Voucher: 167064 4558 4517 CA19031 006559 073462 1005454 707605 4949 013937 Iny Date Description OS/21/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 06/12/2002 MSF-CONF REGISTRATIONS OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 06/03/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/31/2002 PS-POLYGRAPH EXAMS OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 06/05/2002 PKDBC-REPAIR LEAK/WATE 06/01/2002 AG01-109: PKM SANITATION 05/30/2002 PS-TUITION REIMBURSEMEt\ OS/23/2002 PKM-SKIDSTEER RENTAUIN 04/20/2002 PKM-SKIDSTEER RENTALIIN 05/31/2002 PKM-REPAIRlMAINT SUPPLI 05/31/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 05/09/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 05/30/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 05/03/2002 PKDBC-REPAIRIMAINTENAN 05/06/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 04/25/2002 PS-POLICE PRE-EMPLOYMEt 06/01/2002 AG01-128: DUMAS BAY REST 06/01/2002 AG02-36: STL LAKE SOCCER 05/01/2002 PKiAD/PL: DEVELOP MAPS;- Amount Paid 64.09 1,215.00 24.38 81.59 500.00 27.30 2,322.88 382.50 131.30 320.68 291.07 95.96 233.38 47.70 11.95 36.73 24.25 112.32 7,342.10 1,694.50 3,029.21 Check Total 64.09 1,215.00 .24.38 81.59 500.00 27.30 2,322.88 382.50 131.30 611.75 449.97 112.32 12,065.81 Page: 9 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: key us bank (Continued) C~ Date Vendor 167065 06/14/2002 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC Voucher: 167065 Inyoice 62177 60620 62078 62227 60520 59360 013978 ()) ,;Ç r> 16706606/14/2002 006542 JAN'S PLANTS & GIFTS Voucher: 167066 . 16706706/14/2002003718 JENKINS, HARDY & ASSOC, PMAY 6 2002 Voucher: 167067 16706806/14/2002000718 JENNINGS EQUIPMENT INC 094377 Voucher: 167068 096183 096200 167069 06/14/2002 004096 JOHNSON CHRISTIE ANDRE 5898 RLC Voucher: 167069 6138 RLC 6142 RLC 6140 RLC 1007213 167070 06/14/2002 006561 JOSLIN, TIMOTHY J Voucher: 167070 167071 06/14/2002 003462 JUNKER, RYAN Voucher: 167071 16707206/14/2002004397 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 20-3 Voucher: 167072 16707306/14/2002 001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIM MAY 2002 Voucher: 167073 16707406/14/2002000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV 1152917 Voucher: 167074 1145399 16707506/14/2002005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI201092 Voucher: 167075 167076 06/14/2002 000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE MAY 2002 Voucher: 167076 013934 Iny Date Description 05/15/2002 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 05/08/2002 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 05/13/2002 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 05/16/2002 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT 05/0612002 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT 05/01/2002 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT 06/04/2002 PKDBC/KFT-HANGING BASK 05/06/2002 AG01-7: PUBLIC DEFENDER ~ 03/18/2002 MSFL T-KUBOTA MOWER RE 06/03/2002 MSFLT-KUBOTA MOWER RE 06/03/2002 MSFL T-KUBOTA MOWER RE 03/06/2002 AGOO-60: PS LEGAL SERVICE 05/01/2002 AGOO-60: PS LEGAL SERVICE 05/01/2002 AGOO-60: PS LEGAL SERVICE 05/02/2002 AGOO-60: PS LEGAL SERVICE OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 OS/29/2002 PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI 05/01/2002 PWD-EXP REV:E CAMPUS C 06/07/2002 MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM F 05/16/2002 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MAl 04/16/2002 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MAl 05/01/2002 PWT-MISC. SUPPLIES; WELC 06/07/2002 MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES R Amount Paid 498.15 896.10 308.07 188.50 201.44 200.30 271.73 781.10 29.91 8.07 26.26 1,992.00 771.00 108.00 310.00 30.22 108.26 864.18 898.87 29,729.18 17,154.36 583.74 247.00 Check Total 2,292.56 271.73 781.10 64.24 3,181.00 30.22 108.26 864.18 898.87 46,883.54 583.74 247.00 Page: 10 apChkLst 06114/2002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 35378 35369 35429 301330 30674 30671 167078 06/14/2002 000302 KING COUNTY RECORDS-ELE1152759 Voucher: 167078 16707906/14/2002 006562 KING, STEVEN LEE Voucher: 167079 16708006/14/2002 000201 KINKO'S INC Voucher: 167080 167081 06/14/2002000201 KINKO'S INC 515100062929 Voucher: 167081 515100062952 16708206/14/2002006592 KIRTLEY-COLE PETROLEUM 102-36792 Voucher: 167082 16708306/14/2002 003399 KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY CA22480FPI Voucher: 167083 16708406/14/2002005322 LA QUINTA INN & SUITES 0282000238 Voucher: 167084 16708506/14/2002 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI Voucher: 167085 Check # Date Vendor 16707706/14/2002003898 KING COUNTY RADIO Voucher: 167077 (j) ~\ \.;,J Invoice 1007745 Inv Date Description 05/30/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 05/30/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 05/30/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 05/31/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 05/30/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES ~ 05/30/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 05/08/2002 MSC-VOTERS PAMPLET GE OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 515100063034 05/30/2002 PWST-PRINTING SERVICES CA22480FPD 2906301 1014202 2781401 2592802 3059601 2781501 1-AG02-27 16708606/14/2002 001963 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC Voucher: 167086 16708706/14/2002006009 LANIER HEALTHCARE INC 0090044534 Voucher: 167087 16708806/14/2002 005668 LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND MAY3-MAY30 Voucher: 167088 16708906/14/2002 003730 LE MONS, ROBERT C Voucher: 167089 C20551 OS/23/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES OS/23/2002 PKM-PRINTING SERVICES 05/30/2002 PW-EXP REVIEW REFUND OS/28/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 04/26/2002 PS-VOLUNTEER LUNCHEON OS/28/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE OS/28/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 05/17/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE OS/28/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE OS/22/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE OS/28/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE OS/28/2002 AG02-27: 2002 ASPHALT OVE 05/17/2002 PS-SUPPLlES:TRANSCRIPTI 05/31/2002 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENSE SVC 05/06/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# Amount Paid 516.60 516.60 431.60 4,297.50 127.50 127.50 1,882.15 22.92 24.48 19.58 2.18 2,632.00 330.00 163.20 80.65 81.87 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 214,272.81 203.85 1,800.00 60.00 Check Total 6,017.30 1,88215 22.92 24.48 21.76 2,632.00 330.00 163.20 220.44 214,272.81 203.85 1,800.00 60.00 Page: 11 apChkLst 0611412002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank (Continued) C~ Date Vendor 16709006/14/2002700516 LEASON, MARY R Voucher: 167090 167091 06/14/2002 005478 LEBEL, SHELLEY Voucher: 167091 16709206/14/2002003474 LEIRA (LAW ENFORCEMENT 1013879 Voucher: 167092 167093 06/14/2002 006083 LEONHARDT:FITCH 21472 Voucher: 167093 16709406/14/2002003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF '220364 Voucher: 167094 16709506/14/2002004422 LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL 33413 Voucher: 167095 167096 06/14/2002 000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC Voucher: 167096 G') ~ --.c. 167097 06/14/2002 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC Voucher: 167097 Inyoice 1008330 013844 21472 59961 59960 59722 002414473594 002412272622 002411672417 002414373534 002412972936 002413673233 002411972497 002413673237 002412972934 002414373538 002413673243 002413473140 002413673244 002414173447 C1939R11391 167098 06/14/2002 006601 LOWE, PHYLLIS Voucher: 167098 16709906/14/2002 000874 MACHINERY COMPONENTS 195294 Voucher: 167099 Inv Date Description OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 05/08/2002 PRCS-FOOD ITEMS. MOTHEF 05/05/2002 PS.LEIRA MEMBERSHIP/CON 04/29/2002 AG01-148: BRAND DEVELOP~ OS/29/2002 MSFLT-TJRE REPAIR 05/07/2002 PKM-ALUM. REPLACEMENT F 05/17/2002 PKCP-PLAYFIELD SAND- OS/20/2002 PWS-MEDIUM BARK- 05/03/2002 PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL OS/24/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 05/02/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES 04/26/2002 PKPL-REPAIR/MAINTENANC OS/23/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP 05/09/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES 05/16/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 04/29/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP 05/16/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP 05/09/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES 05/23/2002 PS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES 05/16/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES 05/14/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 05/16/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES OS/21/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP 06/05/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 05/10/2002 MSFL T-RANSOME MOWER R Amount Paid 27.30 166.20 20.00 14,646.19 253.09 2,931.35 395.54 58.64 93.87 98.96 69.65 47.62 27.32 22.11 20.54 18.91 17.18 153.81 16.25 -7.58 12.83 9.61 6.84 500.00 195.80 Check Total 27.30 166.20 20.00 14,646.19 253.09 2,931.35 54805 514.05 500.00 195.80 Page: 12 apChkLst 06114/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY page: 13 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 16710006/14/2002 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLP 00002650 Voucher: 167100 00002642 00002644 00002649 00002643 00002648 00002639 00002640 00002641 00002646 00002645 00002638 167101 06/14/2002 005828 MARINE VIEW SAND & GRAV 994 Voucher: 167101 985 16710206/14/2002 004094 MATHESON, DEREK 013870 Voucher: 167102 16710306/14/2002 000960 MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 42110238 Voucher: 167103 16710406/14/2002006602 MATTSON, GEORGIA Voucher: 167104 16710506/14/2002 006563 MCCANN, LISA E Voucher: 167105 16710606/14/2002 006594 MCCLINTOCK, MELISSA Voucher: 167106 16710706/14/2002004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC 121409 Voucher: 167107 16710806/14/2002005176 MERINO, BETTY Voucher: 167108 16710906/14/2002 000286 METROCALL Voucher: 167109 16711006/14/2002 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE Voucher: 167110 16711106/14/2002001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR Voucher: 167111 ~ Date Vendor ~ ~ V'\ Invoice C2062R11393 1009454 101755 CAO024856 4254897 32420 FC 6360 4080 4079 Inv Date Description 05/31/2002 AGOO-150A: MISC CODE AME 05/31/2002 CD-EXPR: ENCHANTED PAR 05/31/2002 CD EPR: U-HAUL FACILITY 05/31/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 05/31/2002 CD EPR: TRUMAN HIGH SCH 05/31/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 05/31/2002 CD EPR: TRUMAN HIGH SCH 05/31/2002 CD EPR: NEW HIGH SCHOO 05/31/2002 CD EPR: ENCHANTED PARK 05/31/2002 CD EPR: ENCHANTED PARK 05/31/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 05/31/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I OS/20/2002 PWS-CRUSHED CONCRETE 05/13/2002 SWMCIP-CRUSHED CONCRE OS/22/2002 CM-DEREK MATHESON MIL OS/21/2002 LAW-WA APP RPTS VOL 106 06/05/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 05/31/2002 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 04/22/2002 PKM-PARKING LOT CLEAN! 06/04/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# OS/25/2002 MSTEL-PAGER SERVICE OS/28/2002 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S OS/28/2002 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S 06/01/2002 AG01-66: LANDSCAPE MAl NT 06/01/2002 AG01-66: LANDSCAPE MAINT Amount Paid 945.60 791.55 331.50 306.38 227.33 170.28 137.10 124.80 124.80 1,157.17 30.00 4.80 657.48 177.85 106.66 16.97 150.00 27.30 2.50 1,455.74 80.00 12.88 32.64 5.00 2,965.54 424.69 Check Total 4,351.31 835.33 106.66 16.97 150.00 27.30 2.50 1,455.74 80.00 12.88 37.64 3,390.23 Page: 13 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Inyolce 16711206/14/2002001215 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROU 400281195-00 Voucher: 167112 400281894-00 16711306/14/2002004723 NEATHERY. ROBERT P IAO058399 Voucher: 167113 16711406/14/2002006564 NELSON. NORMAN W Voucher: 167114 Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total OS/22/2002 PS-POLICE TRAINING SVCS 395.00 OS/29/2002 PS-PROJECT MGT SEMINAR 395.00 790.00 05/17/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 54.60 54.60 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 27.30 27.30 1010648 ' ç' ,-C. "" Page: 14 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11:57:26AM FinalCheck List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Bank: key us bank (Continued) G'> ..c.. .j Check # Date Vendor Inyoice 16711606/14/2002000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 139927 Voucher: 167116 140037 139032 139512 139338 139024 139795 139470 138016 138963 140003 140019 138992 136874 139104 139068 137788 139762 139424 139748 139150 139134 139856 140030 139292 140082 139009 139983 140095 139706 140043 138950 139932 139682 139003 ~ Description Amount Paid Check Total OS/21/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 47.39 OS/22/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 41.10 04/30/2002 PKM-GRDREPAIR SUPPLIE 40.03 05/10/2002 PKDBC-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 39.15 05/07/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 36.18 04/30/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 34.65 05/17/2002 PKM-CH REPAIR SUPPLlES- 29.66 05/09/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 20.13 04/04/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 19.54 04/29/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 18.55 OS/22/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 17.59 OS/22/2002 PKM-CIP REPAIR SUPPLIES 17.31 04/29/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 16.98 03/05/2002 SWM-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 15.66 05/01/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 15.42 05/01/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 15.35 03/28/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 14.66 05/16/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 14.38 05/09/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 12.90 05/16/2002 PKCP-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 12.07 05/0212002 PKM-CIP REPAIR SUPPLIES 10.92 05/02/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 8.76 05/19/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 8.32 OS/22/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 8.32 05/07/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 8.11 OS/24/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 7.76 04/30/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 85.89 OS/22/2002 PKM-GRD'REPAIR SUPPLIE 7.32 OS/24/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 0.67 05/15/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 7.24 OS/23/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 6.83 04/29/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 6.50 OS/21/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 6.16 05/15/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 6.10 04/30/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 6.09 Page: 15 apChkLst 06/1412002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice ~ N:. C? 139289 139778 139125 138952 139465 139327 139761 140023 139931 139266 139607 139952 462586 16711706/14/2002000089 NEWS TRIBUNE Voucher: 167117 16711806/14/2002700004 NHRMA. C/O WESTERN STA MSHR-SHRM Voucher: 167118 16711906/14/2002001391 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC C 084075400 Voucher: 167119 16712006/14/2002006588 NORTHWEST ERECTORS, I 01-44223 Voucher: 167120 167121 06/14/2002000708 NRPA-NAT'L REC & PARKAS 013904 Voucher: 167121 16712206/14/2002001405 OLYMPIC FOUNDRY INC 109295 Voucher: 167122 109534 16712306/14/2002000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 008409 Voucher: 167123 007492 16718 007394 007952 16712406/14/2002000034 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPA~419025804-01 Voucher: 167124 420926933-01 16712506/14/2002000112 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC FOCS77307 Voucher: 167125 FOCS77360 16712606/14/2002000829 PACIFIC PLAYGROUND INC INV35144 Voucher: 167126 Iny Date Description 05/07/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 05/16/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 05/02/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOUSUPPLIE 04/29/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOUSUPPLIE 05109/2002 SWM-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 05/07/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 05/16/2002 PKM-CH REPAIR SUPPLlES- OS/22/2002 PKM-CIP REPAIR SUPPLIES OS/21/2002 PKM-CH REPAIR SUPPLlES- 05/06/2002 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SU 05/13/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL OS/21/2002 PKM-CIP REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/19/2002 PWA-NEWSPAPER ADS/SU 06/13/2002 MSHR-SHRM CHAPTER MTG 05108/2002 PKCP-LiGHTING SUPPLIES OS/22/2002 MSF-REFUND BUSINESS LI 05/31/2002 PKIAD/PL 04/25/2002 PKMT/CP-BRONZE PLAQUE 05/09/2002 PKMT/CP-BRONZE PLAQUE 06/04/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 05/23/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 06/03/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI OS/22/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 05129/2002 SWM-REÞAIR/MAINT SUPPL 05/15/2002 PKRCS-RECREATION PROG 05/16/2002 PKRCS-RECREATION PROG OS/28/2002 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN OS/29/2002 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 05/15/2002 PKM-PLAYGROUND REPAIR I Amount Paid 5.97 5.92 5.86 5.37 4.40 4.33 3.33 3.04 3.01 2.74 2.52 1.41 108.00 50.00 46.02 50.00 520.00 761.60 190.40 77.81 109.51 45.10 1.23 8.97 447.15 104.67 604.21 244.16 17.93 Check Total 711.59 108.00 50.00 4602 50.00 520.00 952.00 242.62 551.82 848.37 17.93 Page: 16 apChkLst 06114/2002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Inyoice G> ..c.. -..c 16712706/14/2002006440 PAPE MACINERY INC Voucher: 167127 167128 06/14/2002 005025 PCCI - PROFESSIONAL COMfv20352 Voucher: 167128 20353 16712906/14/2002001166 PETTY CASH 013924 Voucher: 167129 16713006/14/2002001189 PETTY CASH 014053 Voucher: 167130 167131 06/14/2002002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M013954 Voucher: 167131 16713206/14/2002006565 PIGGOTT, ROBERT E Voucher: 167132 16713306/14/2002006218 POTELCO, INC. Voucher: 167133 16713406/14/2002000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 558079 Voucher: 167134 558081 16713506/14/2002000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 727-469-100- Voucher: 167135 753-129-100- 311-112-700- 109-922-100- 722-288-100- 002-141-100- 004-919-100- 954-567-100- 711-141-100- 102-141-100- 319-041-100- 1012067 2300034 014053 1011796 013990 16713606/14/2002006566 PUGH, SCOTT V Voucher: 167136 16713706/14/2002 003236 QFC Voucher: 167137 16713806/14/2002000073 QUADRANT SYSTEMS INC Voucher: 167138 016477 005790 020517-29 Inv Date Description 05/15/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 06/01/2002 AGOO-14B: KLCC JANITORIA 06/01/2002 AGOO-14B: KLCC JANITORIA 05/31/2002 PRCS-PARKING FOR SR SE 06/11/2002 CM-PRETTY CASH REIMB 06/04/202 PKM-MILEAGE/P WRIGHr OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 06/05/2002 PWCIP-CONSTRUCTION; H 05/17/2002 LAW-Coalition of Cities - Rate ~ 05/17/2002 LAW-COALITION OF CITIES Þ OS/21/2002 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY C OS/21/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE OS/21/2002 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY C 06/06/2002 PKM-FACILITYELECTRICITY 06/06/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 06/06/2002 PKM-STEEL LAKE ELECTRIC 05/08/2002 PWSWM-ELECTRICiTY CHA OS/22/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 06/06/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 06/06/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 06/06/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 04/26/2002 PWSWR-RECYCLE EVENT 4 04/25/2002 PS-CITIZEN ACADEMY&VOLL 06/01/2002 MSDP/FI: CASHING SOFTWAI Amount Paid 611.28 1,797.00 915.00 280.89 296.53 159.78 24.38 3,780.00 2,135.77 197.22 1,574.72 -1.41 1,361.58 1,061.52 171.08 41.36 29.31 5.98 5.92 5.92 5.92 25.84 36.23 35.54 770.00 Check Total 611.28 2,712.00 280.89 296.53 159.78 24.38 3,780.00 2,332.99 4,261.90 25.84 71.77 770.00 Page: 17 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor 16713906/14/2002 000202 QWEST Voucher: 167139 (Continued) 16714006/14/2002005922 QWEST DEX Voucher: 167140 167141 06/14/2002000381 R & K PHOTO ENTERPRISES 188477 Voucher: 167141 16714206/14/2002 005302 RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAIN 3269 Voucher: 167142 16714306/14/2002006442 RENT MY HONEY 20906 Voucher: 167143 16714406/14/2002005939 RIGHT BRAIN UNLIMITED LL 22464 Voucher: 167144 ~ 16714506/14/2002004317 RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PH 1026066300 \$"\ Voucher: 167145 6 16714606/14/2002004518 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATICMAY6-MAY31 Voucher: 167146 16714706/14/2002006567 ROMANOFF, TAMMY K " Voucher: 167147 167148'06/14/2002006598 ROSS DRESS FOR LESS Voucher: 167148 16714906/14/2002000503 ROYAL REPROGRAPHICS 0206920-IN Voucher: 167149 16715006/14/2002005940 RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL RU-7822 Voucher: 167150 167151 06/14/2002 006568 RUGGLES, MILDRED L Voucher: 167151 16715206/14/2002006569 RUPP, DONALD L Voucher: 167152 16715306/14/2002004849 SAMS SANITARY & MAINTEN 65115 Voucher: 167153 16715406/14/2002006241 SCHROEDER. JEANNE Voucher: 167154 Inyoice 253-661-9833 253-661-9833 253-D08-6046 253--661-9833 01128524400 209063 1012711 02-47511 1012831 1012852 013946 Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 11/16/2001 MSTEL-PHONEIDATASVC( 67.43 10/1612001 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC ( 50.12 05/1912002 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC ( 462.45 09/16/2001 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC ( 50.12 630.12 OS/22/2002 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD 224.98 224.98 05/1712002 PS-FILM ED-24 FOR INVESTI 22.49 22.49 06/10/2002 AGOO-12B: ROW LANDSCAP 14.081.07 14,081.07 OS/21/2002 PKDBC-REPAIR DUMPSTER ( 100.66 100.66 OS/21/2002 PKM-DOG PICK-UP WICKET 211.08 211.08 05/13/2002 PS-PHOTO SUPPLIES/SVC 239.10 239.10 06/03/2002 AGOO-74B: TELECOMMUNICA 2,235.40 2.235.40 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 22.92 22.92 06/05/2002 CD-SIGN INCENTIVE PROGR, 2.200.00 2.200.00 OS/20/2002 PKlPL:NEW ORIGINAL BOND; 477.96 477.96 05/31/2002 PS-POLICE AIR CARTRIDGE i 1.095.39 1.095.39 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 27.30 27.30 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 25.84 25.84 05/10/2002 PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPL 257.86 257.86 06/04/2002 PS-FOOD:DEPT TRAINING: 181.56 181.56 Page: 18 apChkLst 06114/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Bank: key us bank Vendor (Continued) Invoice 16715506/14/2002005775 SECOND CHANCE BODY AR 0274144-IN Voucher: 167155 16715606/14/2002 701691 SEDLACK, JANET F Voucher: 167156 16715706/14/2002006570 SEDLAK, EDWARD M Voucher: 167157 16715806/14/2002001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY Voucher: 167158 16715906/14/2002006571 SHANE, DIANA M Voucher: 167159 16716006/14/2002003873 SIGN-A-RAMA Voucher: 167160 167161 06/14/2002000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI26635 Voucher: 167161 16716206/14/2002000723 SOUND RESOURCE MGMT G FWA-002 Voucher: 167162 16716306/14/2002002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL Voucher: 167163 16716406/14/2002006080 SQUAD ROOM EMBLEMS Voucher: 167164 16716506/14/2002 003735 ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL Voucher: 167165 16716606/14/2002006603 ST PHILOMENA SCHOOL Voucher: 167166 16716706/14/2002000872 STAR LAKE GREENHOUSE I 5098 Voucher: 167167 16716806/14/2002 006572 STEWART, BRENDA L 1014 Voucher: 167168 16716906/14/2002 006596 STiCKLAND, CHRISTINE L. APRIL 28,02 Voucher: 167169 16717006/14/2002005891 SUDDEN IMAGE INC Voucher: 167170 167171 06/14/2002 003896 SUMMIT LAW GROUP Voucher: 167171 Check # Date () \Jì -... 1013342 1013341 523/3996 530/9283 1013431 6014 1-317301 1-319771 1-317302 013987 F0213605009 C2044R11392 1014315 2639 14213 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 05/16/2002 PS-BULLETPROOF VEST:M N 711.49 711.49 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 24.38 24.38 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 24.38 24.38 OS/23/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 27.81 05/30/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 27.81 55.62 05124/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 25.84 25.84 05/13/2002 PWSWR-SIGNS; CORO PLA 1,109.76 1,109.76 05/30/2002 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 272.45 272.45 05/31/2002 AGOO-154A:SOL WST/RECY C 193.50 193.50 05/06/2002 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC 92.48 06/03/2002 PKM-PEST CONTROL SVCS 89.22 05/06/2002 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC 51.14 232.84 04/02/2002 PS-BADGE PATCHES:SRT 195.90 195.90 05/16/2002 PS-POLICE MEDICAL EXAMS 1,421.52 1,421.52 06/05/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150.00 OS/22/2002 PKM-FLAT DEPOSIT 197.04 197.04 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 25.84 25.84 05/02/2002 PKRCS-PROFESSIONAL DAN 100.00 100.00 06/01/2002 PS-PHOTO SERVICES 1,566.10 1,566.10 OS/23/2002 AG01-151: LAW SVCS-POLIC 1,810.90 1,810.90 - Page: 19 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 20 06/14/2002 11 :57:26AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Inyoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 16717206/14/2002 005910 SUMNER TRACTOR & EQUI 01 247637 06/03/2002 PKM-AIR FIL TERIHOUSING F 31.95 31.95 Voucher: 167172 16717306/14/2002000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE UNIT A-8 OS/21/2002 PS-MONTHLY STORAGE RE~ 165.00 Voucher: 167173 A-8 OS/28/2002 PS-MTHL Y STRGE RENTAL F 165.00 330.00 16717406/14/2002 006573 SWEENEY, MATHIEU S 1014644 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 24.38 24.38 Voucher: 167174 16717506/14/2002001601 TAK INC 5793 OS/27/2002 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 195.30 195.30 Voucher: 167175 16717606/14/2002 006255 TEKS SERVICES, INC 1497 06/10/2002 SWMWQ-MAILING SERVICE: 801.43 801.43 Voucher: 167176 16717706/14/2002003255 TERRITORIAL SUPPLIES INC 81-2151 04/30/2002 MSFL T-MI8C EQUIP. P8 VEH 1,914.16 1,914.16 Voucher: 167177 16717806/14/2002 006512 TES8COINC 286746 OS/21/2002 NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHIN 230.66 Voucher: 167178 285618 OS/21/2002 NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHIN 56.70 (jJ 285619 OS/21/2002 NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHIN 39.85 '" 286745 OS/22/2002 NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHIN 53.40 380.61 ~ 16717906/14/2002004469 TEUFEL NURSERY INC 280802 05/14/2002 PKM-100 FT COIUCHAINLOC 125.58 125.58 Voucher: 167179 16718006/14/2002006597 THE ABBEY ROAD GROUP 02-48400 06/03/2002 CDPL-REFUND 01-XXXXXX- 620.10 620.10 Voucher: 167180 167181 06/14/2002002819 THE FINISHING TOUCH 6674 05/31/2002 PKDBC-REPAIR WINDOW SH 76.16 76.16 Voucher: 167181 16718206/14/2002 006227 THE WRIGHT CO INC 512 OS/21/2002 AG01-150: BLDG STRUCTURE 12,920.00 12,920.00 Voucher: 167182 16718306/14/2002006544 THORSON, JOAN A 1000022 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 27.30 27.30 Voucher: 167183 16718406/14/2002 005983 TO DAY'S CAREERS 31896 05/13/2002 MSHR-JOB AD-RECRUITMEN 296.00 296.00 Voucher: 167184 16718506/14/2002001267 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC 322663 05/13/2002 PKRCS-f3ROGRAM SUPPLIE 61.20 61.20 Voucher: 167185 16718606/14/2002001715 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN 174833 OS/23/2002 PKCP-PESTICIDE SVCS 685.44 685.44 Voucher: 167186 16718706/14/2002 005912 TRUMAN HIGH SCHOOL PS-ANNUAL 06/28/2001 PS-SCHOOL ANNUAL:CIS 40.00 40.00 Voucher: 167187 Page: 20 apChkLst 06/1412002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice (j> \f\ "'ð 16718806/14/2002006574 TWIGG, DAVID W Voucher: 167188 16718906/14/2002005253 US BANCORP Voucher: 167189 16719006/14/2002005254 US BANCORP Voucher: 167190 167191 06/14/2002002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 72130 Voucher: 167191 72806 16719206/14/2002000618 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SU 7924790 Voucher: 167192 7925021 16719306/14/2002003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE F6588V321 Voucher: 167193 16719406/14/2002005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE25656486-001 Voucher: 167194 26049430-001 16719506/14/2002005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE25696775-001 Voucher: 167195 25592769-001 16719606/14/2002 001805 VADIS NORTHWEST 00012603 Voucher: 167196 16719706/14/2002003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS (200456 Voucher: 167197 16719806/14/2002006575 VARGAS, HIROKO M 1015603 Voucher: 167198 16719906/14/2002004628 WA STATE PATROL IDENTI MAR19-MAY16 Voucher: 167199 16720006/14/2002000280 WA STATE-EMPLOYMENT S 013932 Voucher: 167200 013965 167201 06/14/2002002275 WA STATE-LABOR & INDUST 112918 Voucher: 167201 16720206/14/2002000175 WA STATE-LICENSE DEPT/F 06/2796 Voucher: 167202 16720306/14/2002000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUE MAY 2002 Voucher: 167203 16720406/14/2002006576 WADE, STANLEY W Voucher: 167204 1015397 MAY 2002 MAY 2002 1015603 1015835 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 24.38 24.38 06/05/2002 MSF-CITY TRAVEL EXPENSE 1,346.45 1,346.45 06/1312002 PŠ-CHANGES AIRFARE 5/1 M 4,392.73 4,392.73 OS/23/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 25.22 OS/29/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 20.49 45.71 05/01/2002 PKM"MULCH ECO FIBER 1,483.82 05/09/2002 PKM-CEL. PK. GRASS SEED 1,044.48 2,528.30 08/11/2001 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 61.30 61.30 OS/21/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 319.21 06/05/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 33.73 352.94 OS/25/2002 PKM-PWER SNAKE RENTAL 152.32 05/16/2002 PKM-PWER SNAKE RENTAL 10.92 163.24 05/31/2002 AGOO-2B: LITTER CONTROL ~ 4,101.42 4,101.42 05/15/2002 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 172.00 172.00 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 11.46 11.46 05/15/2002 PS-REMIT CPL FEES 840.00 840.00 05/16/2002 PS-EMPLOYMENT SECURIT 11.52 05/31/2002 PS-EMPLOYMENT SECURIT 4.50 16.02 05/07/2002 PKM-FACILITIES BOILER IN 367.30 367.30 06/10/2002 MSHR-LiC PLATES/REGIS F 27.25 27.25 06/07/2002 MSF-REMIT STATE FEES 43,724.86 43,724.86 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 25.84 25.84 Page: 21 apChkLst 06/1412002 11 :57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 16720506/14/2002005192 WAHl, SANTOSH Voucher: 167205 16720606/14/2002 005100 WARTER, SANDRA Voucher: 167206 16720706/14/2002005352 WEISENBACH SPECIALTY P 64963 Voucher: 167207 16720806/14/2002 005565 WELCOME COMMUNICATIO 1847 Voucher: 167208 16720906/14/2002000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DIS 286034 Voucher: 167209 16721006/14/2002001990 WESTERN LlNENIWELCOME 1113/0500 Voucher: 167210 ~ 167211 06/14/2002 001427 WESTERN POWER & EQUIP '1\ Voucher: 167211 ,,-..( F26671 J32672 J32012 J32446 J32011 167212 06/14/2002 002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 3439725 Voucher: 167212 24-110414 16721306/14/2002 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 1510 Voucher: 167213 16721406/14/2002 006577 WILKINSON, DAVID L 101650 Voucher: 167214 16721506/14/2002000428 WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASS 013873 Voucher: 167215 16721606/14/2002 003347 WSDOTlT2 CENTER Voucher: 167216 167217 06/14/2002 006578 YOUNG, CHARLES W Voucher: 167217 16721806/14/2002 006579 YU, MIZZLE S Voucher: 167218 Check # Date Vendor Inyoice CA23701 REFUND 1016502 013552 1017130 1017180 Iny Date Description 05/30/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# Amount Paid 150.00 Check Total 150.00 425.04 235.35 1,108.82 40.83 90.05 829.66 199.97 38.25 27.30 7000 345.00 24.38 22.92 764,173.02 OS/24/2002 MC-LODGING PRE EDUC/CO 425.04 OS/22/2002 PWSWR-PRINTING; SET-UP 05/14/2002 PS-BATTERY/RADIO ACCES~ 235.35 1,108.82 40.83 05/1612002 MSFL T-TORO MOWER REPA OS/20/2002 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL 90.05 05/10/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/13/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/02/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/09/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/02/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 03/26/2002 PKCP-BALLFIELD SUPPLIES OS/28/2002 PWS-LANDSCAPE MAINTEN 05/31/2002 PS-FIRING RANGE USE 677.97 78.12 10.45 48.58 14.54 163.24 36.73 38.25 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 27.30 05/07/2002 PKM-WRPA MEMBERSHIP 0 70.00 05/02/2002 PWT-ACCESS MGMT, LOCAT OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 345.00 24.38 OS/24/2002 MC-JUROR FEE: 5/20-24 22.92 Sub total for us bank: Page: 22 apChkLst 06/14/2002 11:57:26AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 255 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 764,173.02 ()ì V\ '-'\ Page: 23 ... '" ëD '" "' D.. ... '" ¡,; '" '" D.. -'" .,0 ...10 .>:'" .c~ u~ 0.", "'0 :;; ~ '" ;..: '!! ..... ..... ~ 110 0 'It~ u .>:~ .>: ut- e CI> CD "' .c ~ m u G~~ MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# §Cc:-~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: May 2002 Monthly Financial Report .__._-~---_.._---- ------~------ CATEGORY: BUDGET IMP ACT: [8J CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATIACHMENTS: May 2002 Monthly Financial Report SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee during their June 25th meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye for the approval ofthe May 2002 Monthly Financial Report." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05110/2001 'F2- CITY 8F ~ .~-~~: EC~ ~)}~ MEMORANDUM Date: June 20, 2002 To: Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee From: Via: Michael Olson, Deputy Management Services Director David Moseley, City Manager Subject: May 2002 Monthly Financial Report Action Reauested: Accept the May 2002 Monthly Financial Report and forward to the July 2nd Council meeting for full Council approval. Committee Member 11~~~i/ud K,IFINIMFRIOI mfrlMFRFEDRACCVRDOC J-I f'J.- ~ ED ERFIL ~~AY "A City for All of Us" 2002 Projected Revenues & E~ndltures 50.00 45.00 Overview Significant Events General Government Revenues Expenditures Attachment A 2 -II 12-16 17 May 2002 Monthly Financial Report The Monthly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview offmancial activity that has taken place in the reporting period. This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Center. The Sunnnary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial activity through May for the years 1997 through 2002. IDGHLlmITS State Auditors In State auditors arrived the first part of May for the 2001 audit. The entrance conference was held on June 7"'. The audit coverage will include: accountability for public assets; state and local legal compliance; federal compliance/single audit; and an opinion on financial reporting. F'J Citv of Federal Waf Mav 2002 Montklv Financial Renort GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES General governmental operating revenue collections through May 2002 total $19,863,622, which is $1,638,444 or 9.0% above the year-to-date budget of $t8,225,178. Of this amount, $551,089 is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the payment of debt services. Attachment A provides a comparison of year-to-date revenues by major sources for 2002 with comparative figures for the past 5 years. REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Period Ending May 31, 2002 . Açtu~ls . .Vaiiance .' Thcougl> . l'àyorable: u,ttaYorable . . . M~y Dollars:($!:' 'PèrcehH%!. Property Taxes 3,720,282 $ 7,724,021 $ 3,939,813 $ 3,939,813 0.0% Sales Tax 4.438,568 9,901,765 4,102,596 4.486,718 384,122 9.4% HotellMotel Lodging Tax 57,280 120,000 49,514 38,065 (11.449) -23.1% Criminal Justice Sales Tax 703,533 1,644,455 661,738 660,501 (1,236) .0.2% Intergovernmental 1,293.642 3,200,322 1,229,726 1,306,203 76,476 6.2% Real Estate Excise Tax 609,953 1.400,000 462,626 956,651 494,024 106.8% Gambling Taxes 962,930 1,700,000 704,639 944,942 240,303 34.1% Utility Taxes 2,896,612 6,226,974 2,887,397 2,944.462 57,065 2.0% Court Revenue 449,514 1,036,164 437,960 410,062 (27,899) -6.4% Building Permits/Fees-CD 440.482 1,216,734 501,259 654,383 153,125 30.5% Expedited Review Fees-CD 42.476 27,039 27,039 nla ROW PermitslFees-PW 142,557 263.477 115,142 139,673 24,531 21.3% Expedited Review Fees-PW 848 17,725 2.499 28,585 26,086 1043.9% Licenses 45,066 177,432 46,132 70,768 24,635 53.4% Franchise Fees 280,647 575,935 279,955 324,770 44,816 16.0% Recreation Fees 244,523 625,264 254,092 273,925 19,833 7.8% Dumas Bay Centre 245,513 530,800 209,197 204,971 (4,225) -2.0% Knutzen Family Theatre 35,177 68,860 26,149 32,747 6,598 25.2% Interest Earnings 446,225 767,232 208,315 208,315 0.0% dmin I Cash Management Fees 198.461 474,027 221,871 221,871 0.0% SWM Fees 1,532,760 3,187,834 1,584,722 1,584,722 0.0% Refuse Collection Fees 63,304 155,308 78,811 79,725 914 1.2% Police Services 280,346 557,357 178,035 281,720 103,685 58.2% Other 31,623 58,599 42,990 42,990 0.0% SubtotalOeratl :Revènues. . U;162;322' . 4U3M85 .'18;225;178. '.19,863;622 . 1;636;'1#:- : 9,0'1. Other Financin Sources 5,739,685 5,799,546 4,437,536 4,437,536 0.0% otal Rèvèr1".s:" OthOT5oÍlrcòs . $: '24;902;207 $': AM29,831' $: . :22;66.2;714. $ .2'1,301.1$7 $ 1;638;'144. .7-.2'1. 56500000 5t500000 46500000 41500000 36500000 COMPARISON OF 2002 OPERATING REVENUES. BUDGET TO ACTUAL Total 2002 Budgeted Revenues $41,630,285 16500000 11500000 6500000 31500000 26500000 21500000 1500000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Noy Dee 'F'-/ Citv of Federal Waf Mav 1001 Month/v Financial Reoort Real Estate Excise Tax Year-to-date Real Estate Excise tax revenue total $956,651, which is $494,024 or 106.8% above the budgeted amount of$462,626. The current month's receipt of $329,252 is also above the monthly estimate of $114,666 by $214,585 or 187.1%. There were a total of 220 real estate transactions, of which 76 were tax exempt and of the remaining 144,7 were mobile home sales. The largest transactions in May consist of the sale of two major apartment complexes located on SW Campus Drive, totaling $34.4 million; the sale of a shopping center in the Twin Lakes area for $6.3 million; another smaller apartment complex located on 14"' Ave South for $850K; and a few higher priced residential homes. REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX ACTIVITY Through May 2002 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 "- ~ 3t <> § ¡ 1:; ~ :!! :!! ~ ,. "i 1:> [! s:: /i!j tV ~ -P5 Citv of Federal Waf Mav 2002 Montklv Financial Reoort Sales Tax Sales tax received through May of $4,486,718 is $384,122 or 9.4% above the year-to-date budget of$4, 102,596.2002 year-to-date revenue of $4,486,718 is also higher than May 2001 year-to-date revenue of $4,438,568 by $48,150 or 1.1 %. Sales tax received in the month of May total $911,658, which is $99,852 or 12.3% above the adopted budget estimate of$81 1,806. Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 65.1 % of all sales tax collections. Year-to- date May 2002 retail sales tax collections are $27,214 or 0.9% higher than May 2001. Miscellaneous retail trade increased substantially. However, decreases in retail general merchandise and retail furniture offset a major portion of the increase. Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 9.7% of sales tax collections is $10,323 or 2.3% below year 2001 activity. We anticipate tax from construction to increase as indicated by the rising number of building pennit applications received for new construction. Service industries account for 10.7% of the total sales tax collections through May. On a year-to-date basis, service sales tax is up $39,690 or 9.0% from the year 2001. The majority of the increase is attributable to an infonnation services company reporting taxable sales of over $4M, compared to taxable sales of up to $800K in previous periods. This one-time increase in sales is the result of computer equipment installation for one ofthe city's principal taxpayers. Wholesale tax which accounts for about 5.0% of total sales tax collection, is $62,659 or 21.8% below year 2001 activity. Three major computer stores account for 65% of the decline in sales tax due to decreased sales. 'F'" 4 Citr of Federal Wav Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort SALES TAX ACTIVITY BY SIC CODE YTD Through May 2002 Government Sales Tax Activity by Area % change from previous r Percenta e of total SeaTatcMaW ~ "~~F:; % chan e from revlous r Percenta e of total In % change from previous yr Percenta e of total 531 ~tOS'6t % chan e from revlous yr Percenta e oftolal 443.2% 13.5% 145,338 ~62.2% 4.3% -63.6% 1.0% % change trom previous r Percenta e at total .'MQíêls % change from previous r Percentage 01 total na 1.7% 16,570 ~58.3% 0.5% -0.6% 12.9% 161,628 11.2% 4.6% . ,36j~80 3.0% 1.0% 0.2% 1.6% 15;49;4 ~6.5% 0.4% 11.7% 16.1% "~. 3.4% 12.2% 153,070 -5.3% 4.0% "7$61 108.6% 2.0% 22.8% 1.9% 19,113 23.4% 0.5% 5.6% 15.0% 477,014 1.1% 11.0% 19:m-4!!:. 29.2% 4.5% 2001.36 165.2% 4.6% 112,395 29.2% 2.1% ß.S¡ . 2" ::"ii" 83.4% 0.8% -8.9% 13.4% '322 0.9% 10.8% :.:::ff1164,O -17.0% 3.7% 217. 8.9% 4.9% ~~ 0.0% 2.1% :~29 54.4% 1.2% -3.2% 12.9% '429íU7 -10.8% 9.6% :::~.: 185,718 13.2% 4.1% 218,504 0.2% 4.9% 9o¡m ~2.0% 2.0% '~!W4' .36.0% 0.8% na .1.3% 1 na 0.4% .1::542 na 0.0% 1, na ~0.1% 19,465 na ~0.4% na -3.8% -11I:1IM na ~".6% . 1.1.0% na 9.8% 0.3% na -0.9% -2.0. na .3.0% ':SS¡SOj¡ na ~55.5% The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates over 12.9% of the City's sales tax experienced a decline of$18,946 or 2.9% when compared to the year 2001. The majority of the decrease is attributable to two general merchandise stores, which experienced a combined $20K decrease in taxes paid year-to-date. SeaTac Mall is showing a decrease of $52,054 or 10.9% when compared to year 2001 activity. On a year-to-date basis for taxes paid, four major department stores experienced a total decrease of $28K; retail eating & drinking decreased by $5K; taxes from jewelry sales decreased by $7K; and the remaining decrease is due to an overall decline in SeaTac Mall's taxable sales. On a monthly basis, tax received in May 2002 is $9K less than May 200 I. Major Auto Sales have through May collected $185,718, which is $21,681 or 11.0% above the same period in 200 I. This is due to incentive car rebates given by most car dealerships in the later part of 200 I, and that has carried forward to year 2002. Compared to the prior month, sales tax increased by $5K. Hotels & Motels sales tax collected through May total $34,664, which is $19,465 or 55.5% below the same period in 2001. Over F~ Citv of Federal War Mav 2002 Montklv Financial ReDort 69% of this decrease is due to one hotel that has reported, but not remitted taxes in 2002. According to the state, this hotel's tax is in collections. Staff will continue to monitor their progress. SALES TAX BY AREA YTD through May, 2002 Oth., 66.5% SoaTac Mall 9.6% S 348th 12.9% Major Autos 4.1% Gambling Tax Gambling tax collection of $944,942 is $240,303 or 34.1% above the year-to-date budget of $704,639. In comparison to 2001 year-to-date, 2002's tax collection is lower by $17,989 or 1.9%, which is attributable to the smaller tax paying establishments decrease in activity. The top five establishments paid approximately $875K year-to-date in both 2001 and 2002. May's collection of$162,054 is $17,925 or 12.4% above the monthly budget estimate of$144,130. The $1.7M total budget for 2002 may be slightly low when compared to 2001 's total collections of$2.2M. r€ 6 Ow of Federal Wav Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort HoteVMotel Lodging Tax Hotel/motel lodging tax collected through May total $38,065, which is $11,449 or 23.1% below the year-to-date budget of $49,514. The majority of the variance is due to the one hotel not remitting taxes in 2002. Staff will continue to monitor and follow-up. The amount collected represents activity fTom November 2001 to March 2002. The month-to-month budget is our best estimate based on two full years of history. 5,885 10,145 8,769 4,578 10,977 9,489 9,165 11,239 9,715 April 7,553 11,226 9,704 May 10,383 13,693 11,837 June 3,751 7,351 10,978 9,489 July 6,190 8,584 10,663 9,217 August 5,689 12,106 9,933 8,587 September 8,538 15,569 16,071 13,893 October 7,613 15,967 12,644 10,929 November 8,971 13,463 9,607 8,304 December 5,691 16,163 8,871 10,065 YTO May Total 37,584 57,280 49,514 38,065 (11,449) -23,1% Utility Tax Utility tax received through May total $2,944,462, which is $57,065 or 1.9% above the year-to-date budget total of $2,887,397, The year-to-date May 2002 utility tax receipt is also above the same period in 2001 by $48,850 or 1.6%, Gas taxes exceed the year-to-date budget of $473,811 by $113,620 or 29,3%, However, electricity is below the year-to-date budget of $1,105,887 by $145,983 or 13,2%, Cellular taxes also exceed the year-to-date budget total of $315,414 by $138,904 or 44.4%, a growth trend consistent with prior years, However, year-to-date phone utility tax is below budget by $106,907 or 20.5%, Fq 7 Citv of Federal Waf Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort Bectnc Gas G3rbage Cable Pt-.:re Storm Oranage Cellular Pagers TOCIerefieclsrepcrtirgælMtyttroLghMrch2002 State Shared Revenue State shared revenue collected through May total $1,966,704, and exceeds the budget total of $1,891,464 by $75,240 or 4.0%. Large variances are seen in Liquor Excise Tax and Vehicle Licensing Fees. 110,553 110,779 104,080 (6,699) 138,806 119,332 149,264 29,932 36,876 36,765 38,292 1,527 na 315,276 na 478,651 703,533 661,738 660,501 (1,236) -D,2% 759,936 708,041 690,453 696,780 6,327 0.9% 288,178 293,806 272.397 310,587 38,189 14,0% 5,560 7,200 7,200 riD Citv of Federal War Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort Building Permits and Plan Check Fees Bui]ding penn it revenues collected through May total $654,383, which is above the year-to-date budget by $153,124 or 30.5%. This does not include year-to-date pass through revenue of $27,039 for expedited and environmental review. Revenue collected for expedited review is not currently budgeted nor are the offsetting expenses, Building pennits, which include mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade pennits currently total $380,948 through the end of May, which is above the year-to-date budget of $278,336 by $102,612 or 36.9%. Electrical pennits total $58,196, which is below the year-to-date budget by $3,343 or 5.4%. Plan check fees collected through May total $172,434, which is $46,405 or 37% above the adopted budget of $]26,029. Significant pennits issued year-to-date include SI. Francis Hospital, Glenwood Place Apartments, Silverwood residential development, Federal Way High Schools (Decatur, Federa] Way, Harry Truman and the new one), South Campus Bible School subdivision, Woodstone Credit Union, and Enchanted Parks. $ 91,263 $ $ 82,951 $ $ 117,849 $ $ 110,386 $ $ 98,810 $ $ 12Z344 $ $ 112,195 $ $ 114,482 $ $ 124,599 $ $ 89,357 $ $ 76,016 $ $ 76,482 $ f;ØI~ .J; 1'c1~~'S' 1,215,370 41.2% t f{l Citv of Federal Wav Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort The table below presents a synopsis of building pennit activity as of May 31, 2002 for new construction between 2000 and 2002: Building Division - Permit Activity YTD Through May, 2002 2000 Y~l~e($) $ 5,734,079 4,437,681 0 0 $ 10;\7),760 0 1,096,318 8,058,916 0 768,028 0 $. 9,923,262 0 : $: 2))95;iJ22 2001 Våh,e($) $ 2,072,174 17,593,080 873,919 0 $ 20;$:39,)73: 0 2,024,808 10,393,164 0 590,832 0 $.l3,OO~;~O4 0 $ .33547.977. 2002 .vallie $): $ 7,300,452 29,666,536 0 0 $ 36;966,988' 0 1,540,293 11,815,269 0 607,975 0 $13,963,537 0 $ 50;930,525 TYøe~fPe..:roit . New Residential (Platted) New Commercial New Multi-Family Units New Public $Abt<;;tal;N~wÇø;j~tudiØ¡j:'. Manufactured Homes Residential Alterations Commercial Alterations Plumbing Only Mechanical Only Misc. Building Permits . SiJbiòlål'A:Iteratlons . N~. 35 6 0 0 41' 0 49 93 27 152 0 j2:I 550 "912 N~; 15 5 3 0 23 0 55 107 42 150 0 :354 : 467 844: 40 12 1 0 53 0 57 195 37 130 0 .419. 527 472 Electrical Permits t"tål:B¡'ilclin~Perroits Non-Building Permits: Sign Permits Totals 167 167 $. 643,848 643,848 112 112. IS3,476 107 183,476: '.107 228,417 .128,417 $ $ IToiål:C"ßimerdå'.VålìiåtiOit lçomri";r1'ij¡l~s~%:"fTiJi.1 . . Includes all new, alternatIOn . 99'. .$: 12;496.597 11%. . .62% . 112 $27.986,244 .207. $4I481;8)5' 13% 83%'" .<14%' 81%' ROW Permits and Fees Overall Public Works pennits and fees collected through May total $139,673, which is $24,531 or 21.3% above the year-to-date budget of$115,142. Plan review fees collected total $48,080, which is $23,445 or 32.8% below the budget total of$71,525 for the year-to-date period. ~. January February March April May June July August September October November -56.5% 7.5% 126.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10 -¡::17..- Citv of Federal Wav Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort Court Revenue Court revenue is $88,570 or 29.] % below the year-to-date budget total of $383,673 from fines and forfeitures. Total court revenue collected through May amounts to $4]0,062, which is $27,899 or 6.4% below the year-to-date budget of $437,960, and is also below last year's collections of $35],389 by $14,495 or 4.]%. The base line court revenue is $87,920 or 23.0% below 2001 collections, primarily due to the reduction in traffic and non-parking citations, parking infractions, and criminal costs. DUI and other misdemeanors collected through May total $63,313, which is $13,332 or 26.7% above the year-to-date budget of $49,982, but, however, is in line with 200] collections. Traffic and Non-Parking are below year-to-date budget of$252,135 by $87,390 or 34.7% Ap<1I Moy $36.405 37.763 46,373 49,917 52,203 SO.138 52,491 65,123 56,626 56,176 45.710 67,590 -41.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0,0% 0.0% June Ju~ Augu.' ...- Octo'" N"""..", Decomb" . I",""'. Coo, "_~~Prob"""'" """",, ,"",S""'" Adm. FN_~æ'" æ ""'""""'from ",....eooo""..""" eooo""",-. -eooo"""", S"",,- ""'_Coo'-"""""""'-~. '.""S"","Adm.FN,",,",,"""""'eoooo,...-. -- .""",-"",,~... -""""'""'"CWõd --F13 II Citv of Federal Waf Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Report GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES General governmental expenditures through May total $15,452,816 or 36.2% of the annual operating budget of $42,706,248. Operating expenditures are below the year-to-date budget of$16,382,682 by $929,866 or 5.7%. City Council City Manager Municipal Court-Operations Management Services CiviilCriminal Legal Services Comm. Deveiopment Services Police Services Jail Services Parks and Recreation Public Works City Overlay Pro9ram Snow & Ice Removal Solid Waste HotellMotel Lod9in9 Tax Surface Water Management Debt Service Dumas Bay Centre Knutzen Famil Theatre SubtøtálO r<ltloex Other Finan' EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT Period Ending May 31,2002 124,311 268,828 451,546 682,057 471,255 1,189,852 5,543,652 478,753 1,153,938 1,102,440 65,867 149,481 10,763 595,668 18,578 222,570 72,882 '12;602;441 ' 9,831,358 .. 22,'P3,7~: nsl er one ,me In na ore. 235,940 748,882 1,152,429 1,834,304 1,341,328 3,652,942 14,803,526 1,610,844 3,290,109 3,869,227 2,299,478 379,992 211,187 2,089,846 4,520,792 489,412 176,009 ,42;7116,2411 : 10,111,560 , 52;817,11011, ",'" 'Variánce" ,FalÌor~I:iI~(Urifa"9r¡\b1~} " Døllárs($) , ' Pe:rceOt(%) (45,800) -34.2% 43,354 13.3% (51,002) -11.3% 19,324 2.7% 83,832 14.6% 293,149 19.5% 160,056 2.7% 101,011 19.7% 99,338 8.0% 72,353 5.3% 9,088 11.5% nla 10.1% nta 8.6% nla 8.2% 5.5% ':5;7"1. nla 3,II"A 133,733 326,872 450,395 716,969 574,724 1 ,499,568 5,979,574 512,121 1,238,426 1,375,531 79,325 Actuals 'TI>r:9ugh' 'M<I ' ' , 179,533 283,517 501,397 697,645 490,892 1,206,420 5,819,518 411,110 1,139,089 1,303,178 70,236 137,564 87,995 805,Q63 2,210,913 189,251 64,658 16,382,882 7,864,987 , 5 : il4;247,670 123,636 44,796 736,100 2,210,913 173,727 61,110 '15;452;816 7,864,987 523,317;803: 13,928 43,199 68,963 15,524 3,548 " 929,866: 929;6Ji6: COMPARISON OF 2002 OPERATING EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL rotal2002 Budgeted Expenditures $42,706,248 $40,600,000 $35,600,000 $30,600,000 $25,600,000 $20,600,000 $15,600,000 $10,600,000 $5,600,000 $600,000 'FlY City of Federal War Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial ReDort City Council City Council expenditures total $179,533, which is above the year-to-date budget total of $133,733 by $45,800 or 34.2%. The variance is due mainly to the timing of annual SCA assessment, A WC services and NLC membership dues that were paid in January of this year. Municipal Court Municipal Court Operations expenditures total $501,397, which is above the year-to-date budget of $450,395 by $51,002 or 11.3%. The variance is due mainly to an increase in B1 contract expenses when compared to the same period in 2001. However, BI contract revenue offsets the expenditure increase. City Manager: Activity through May total $283,517, and is below the year-to-date budget of $326,872 by $43,354 or 13.3%. Savings can be found in one-time programs such as Contract lobbyist, City Image and City Newsletter. CiviVCriminal Legal Activity through May total $490,892, which is below the year-to-date budget of $574,724 by $83,832 or 14.6%. Savings can be found in outside legal counseVlitigation specialist cost where only $24K or 28% of its $88K annual budget have been expended year-to-date. The public defense attorney services have also only expended $76K or 30% of its $256K annual budget. Parks and Recreation Parks Operations expenditures through May total $1,139,089, which is $99,338 or 8.0% below the year-to-date budget of $1,238,426. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs approved in the carryforward budget adjustment such as Econnect, Arts Commission, and unscheduled repairs to Klahanee. Recreation and Cultural Services: Recreation fees revenue of $ 273,925 is $19,833 or 7.8% above the year-to-date budget of $254,092. Year-to-date recreation and cultural services revenue of $273,925 is 43.8% of the total annual budget of $625,264. Recreation expenditures are below the year-to-date budget of$I,238,426 by $99,338 or 8.0%. Dumas Bav Centre & Knutzen Theatre: Dumas Bay Centre operating revenue total of $204,971 is $4,225 or 2.0% below the year-to-date budget of $209,197. Operating expenditures of$173,727 is also below the year-to-date budget of$189,251 by $15,524 or 8.2%. Knutzen Theatre operating revenue total $32,747, which is $6,598 or 25.2% above the year-to-date budget of $26,149. Total operating expenditure of$61, 110 is $3,548 or 5.5% below the year-to-date budget estimate of$64,658. Celebration Park: The following table is a breakdown of Celebration Parks M&O. Year-to-date revenue of $206,875 consists ofa $205,880 subsidy from the Utility Tax Fund, and $995 in fees. Maintenance and operations expenditures total $110,224. Operating Revenue - Concession Fees Other Sources of Funding - Transfer in From Utility Tax $ 995 205,880 Salaries & Benefits Supplies Professional Services Equipment Rental Electricity Water & Sewer Repairs & Maintenance Subtotal Other Services & Charges Internal Services Charges-Fleet M&O and Reserves 85,787 6,551 360 3,373 11,691 666 1,577 219 17,667 219 13 +/5 Citv of Federal War Mav 1001 Monthlv Financial Reoort Community Development Conununity Development expenditures through May total $1,206,420, which is $293,149 or 19.5% below the year-to-date budget of $1,499,568. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs approved in the carryforward budget adjustment such as PAA Study, Planned Action SEPA, permit tracking system, and code amendments. Public Works Public Works Operations: Expenditures are below May's year-to-date budget of$I,375,531 by $72,353 or 5.3%. Savings can be found in various one-time funded programs approved in the mid-biennium and carryforward budget adjustments. Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are below the year-to-date budget of $137,564 by $13,928 or 10.1%. Savings are attributable to timing of grant programs. Surface Water Management Operations: Expenditures are below May's year-to-date budget of $805,063 by $68,963 or 8.6%. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs such as ESA Gap Analysis and Steel Lake Wash Facility. Public Safety & Jail Services Police Services have expended $5,819,518 through May, which is below year-to-date estimate budget of $5,979,574 by $160,056 or 2.7%. Savings can be found in various line items, but not specifically to one program. Jail Services: Jail Services is below the year-to-date budget of $512,121 by $101,011 or 19.7%. Explanation of the variance includes: April Okanogan bill (estimated at $5K) is outstanding; January Yakima County bill ($5K) is low compared to following months payments of($IOK - $15K); and King County bills are continuing to decline. King County rates for 2002 increased by 6.7% for bookings and 7.6% for maintenance. Misdemeanor Bookings $148.78 $139.39 6.7% Investigative Bookings $14.88 $13.94 6.7% Misdemeanor Maintenance $76.32 $70.90 7.6% Investigative Maintenance $7.63 $7.09 7.6% 14 f"/(ç Citv of Federal Waf Mav 2002 Monthlv Financial Report General Fund Street Fund Ger;oiaf/$¡;."t".~èf;: $ 8,264,468 275,927 , 8,540.'94 $ ~"bI$ei'Î~_F.":d;1ì}, , '6,508,12~ Special Re.enue: Arterial Street Utility Tax (1) Solid Waste & Recycling Special Study (Gov. TV) Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 2% for the Arts CDBG Paths & Traits SubióilitS '."IaH?i>.eir:iJii:Fu"::iJs" 719,952 6,170,755 199,343 124,882 150,549 28,114 4,140 I 41,863 , 7,~3&,S91 Captta/ Project; Public Safety Facility Downtown Revitalization Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds Celebration Park Park Improvements Sur/ace Water Management Transportation Soblólát:C.i>/I,á/P,ój_èls, 6,552,634 1,303,986 19,959 126,466 577,860 923,236 6,714,122 , 18,~t8,~8J Enterprtse Funds: Sur/ace Water Management Dumas Bay Centre Operations Dumas Bay Centre Capital Knutzen Famity Theatre Capital Knutzen Famity Theatre Operations SubforaJ:Enlè mèFunds ' , 500,811 300,80~ I 76,338 877,957 Internal Servtce Funds: (2) Risk Management Information Systems Mait & Duplication Fleet & Equipment Buildings & Furnishings 3,869,727 1,682,758 182,117 1,841,648 1,037,508 TotalAltFunås, $ 6M98,09J$ 13,055,481 11,026,930 1,177,840 1,303,178 14;~~;3~1 , $, ,12;3'0;108 '$' 3;915;813:: $:' ':4,i94;!l13~ 1,241,969 2,591,392 200,379 1,003 39,327 16,955 3,129 , <4.094;1$~<;$ , 810,832 1,938 6,640 610 489,342 6,256,105 4,370,075 , It.9J5,S4~' 1,586,928 206,214 52,475 346 133,574 '1: 919;S3tH 392,899 573,024 80,765 336,335 165,648 70,236 4,456,677 123,636 3,372 44,796 23,801 " ¡t7~2:'518 7,852 3,617 197,178 (20,692) 2,126,564 ~,314.S19 1,760,109 210,505 46,999 61,110 ~;(j9B.:123 374,806 571,242 76,626 564,351 106,476 2,028,550 (125,337)' '1;903;213 ,$ : :(31&,101')' I 1,171,733 (1,865,285)¡ 76,743 : (2,368) (5,469) (6,846) 3,129 , tJZ8;3/;~) 810,832 (5,915) 6,640 (3,006) 292,164 ' 6,276,797 2,243,511 ,. 9.6Zt;OZ3 " (193,181) (4,291) 5,476 346 72,464 U&1/11 18,093 1,782 4,139 57,171 3?,1/;?;t)l9':$, ,27,46&.286 10,293,018 150,589 , 10;44',801' 6,189;021: 1,891,685 4,305,470 276,086 122,513 145,080 28,114 (2,706) 44,992 6.8Ü;Z:13 7,363,466 1,298,072 26,599 123,461 870,023 7,200,033 10,957,633 "Z1;839;Z88 307,630 (4,291) 306,284 76,684 72,464 758;770, 3,887,821 1,684,541 186,256 1,613,632 1 ,094,679 (1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service. (2) Internal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpose of fixed asset replacement, with the exception of Risk Management, which is comprised of accumulated reserves for self-insurance and strategic reserve 15 fn ATTACHMENT A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES OPERATING FUNDS Through May 2002 199T-2002 $23,208,938 $ 0.0% 3,14T.8BO 3,410,111 3,545.T35 3.533,TTI 3.0TI.349 3,B5B,3T3 3,586,038 4.349,439 3T.563 649,549 1,T4T,T08 722,712 626,990 2,528.540 3T8,822 427,496 29,72B 131,732 1'.7BB 4B,049 23T,613 214,007 222,B13 31,233 39B,094 71,255 1,645,OT5 59,942 259,14B 30,352 . 18,34ð;688. 3,72O,2B2 4,438.568 5T,2BO T03.533 1,293,642 609,953 962.930 2.B96.612 449,514 440,482 42.476 142,557 B4e 45,066 2BO,647 244,523 245.513 35.177 446.225 19B,461 1.532.760 63.304 2BO,346 31.623 19,182;a22 . 7.724.021 9.901,765 120,000 1,644.455 3.200,322 1,400,000 1,700,000 6,226,974 1,036,164 1,216,734 3,939,B13 4,102,596 49.514 661,T3B 1,229,726 462,626 704,639 2,BB7,397 43T.960 501,259 3,939,BI3 4.4e6,71B 3B.065 660.501 1,306.203 956,651 944,942 2,944.462 410,062 654,383 2T,039 139.673 2B,585 TO,T6B 324,770 273,925 204,971 32,T47 20B.315 221,B71 1,584,722 T9,725 2BI.720 , 42,990 ' IV,B8a,822 . 0,0% 9.4% -23.1% -0.2% 6,2% 106.B% 34.1% 2.0% -6,4% 30.5% "-'a 21.3% 1043.9% 53.4% 16.0% 7.8% -2.0% 25.2% 0.0% 0,0% 0,0% 1,1% 5B.2% 0.0% .$.D.% 384.122 (11.449): (1.236) 76,476 494,024 240,303 57,065 (27.B") 153,125 27.039 24.531 26,086 24.635 ' 44,816 19,833 (4,225) 6,59B 503.422 1,60B,649 661,417 163,512 1,220,BI5 222.6BI 382,527 56B,B29 1,658,70B 721,IB6 121,192 2.166.466 342,BT9 256.914 583.527 2,132,863 809.202 574.265 2,3B3.260 357.54' 567.659 33,402 103,310 20,49B 76,9B4 236,9BB 215,321 193,076 17,055 4B'.4B2 70,200 1,452,BB2 62,441 157.B44 45,406 . 17;4V2;.""'¡.: 60,75B B3.570 263,477 17,725 177.432 575,935 625.264 530.BOO 6B.B60 76T.232 474,027 3,1B7,B34 155.30B 557,357 5e,599 : :41;630;285: . 115.142 2.499 46,132 279,955 254,092 20',19T 26,14' 2OB,315 221,B71 1,584.722 7B.BII 17B.035 42,990 '.;225;171 36.ITB 222.97B 171.134 113.469 26.344 227,465 1B6,570 130,559 193.9TB 67,806 1,412,747 60,40T 75,664 213,337 13;""',469 299,124 69,162 1,264,24B BI,159 56,234 685,64B 16,_,BB5 914 103,585 . .1;BaU4+:,: i (45,BOO) 43,354 (51,002) 19,324 B3,B32 293,149 160,056 101,011 99.33e 72,353 ',OBB 13,92B 43,199 58.963 105,252 247,IBB 99.062 252,73' 113.179 248,297 9B,O49 172,B77 276,B51 595,226 490.347 1,150,B66 5,246,700 531.195 1,121.949 1.099,OB6 46,536 121,420 15.435 555.4BO 102 212.58B 6B,020 11,800,530 124,311 26B,B2B 451,646 6B2,057 471,255 1,IB9,B52 5,543,B52 47B,753 1.153,'3B 1,102,440 65,B67 149,4BI 10,7B3 5'5.668 IB,57B 222.570 72.882 '2,B02,'" 235,940 74B,BB2 1,152,429 I,B34,304 1,341.32B a,652,942 14,B03,526 1.610.B44 3,290.109 3.B69,227 2.299.47B 379.992 211,IB7 2.0B9.B46 4,520,792 4B9.412 176,009 42,T08,2" 133,733 326,B72 450,395 716,969 574,724 1,499,568 5,979,574 512,121 1,238.426 1,375,531 7',325 137,584 87,995 805,063 2,210,913 IB9.251 64.65B 1B,:!II2,BB2 179,533 2B3,517 501,397 697,645 49O,e'2 1,206,420 5,B19,51B 411,110 1.13',OS9 1,303,178 70,236 ';;::1 736.100 : 2,210,913 173.727 61.110 15,452,B1B -34.2% 13.3% -11.3% 2.7% 14.6% 19.5% 2.7% 19.7% B.O% 5.3% 11.5% 10.1% 49.1% B.6% 0.0% B.2% 5.5% 5.T% 5B4,779 517.519 1,112,553 I 3,975,496 268.904 1,025.713 1,134,505 43,373 163,441 559,577 639.077 1.091,518 4,574,307 261.356 1,050.335 1.254,665 93,522 92,152 691,19B 677,436 1,150,654 4,B64,519 431.571 1.113.023 1.129.769 23,226 75.132 61B,337 (9.245)' 162,344 ¡ ',950,157 550,677 2.1B4 160,425 644,929 102 190,57B 40311 ",393,92B 15.524 I 3.54B : 929,BBB 10,BB1,59T Operating Revenues overlCunder) 0 eratin Ex ndltures '3,999,302 5,322,OB8 B,O99,011 B,545,157 B,559,'80 1,075,OB3 1,842,49B 4,410,805 2,5B8,309 13B.4% Dlher FInancing Source. 7,230,3T3 5,T39,se5 5.799.546 4,437,536 4.437,536 0.0% 3,524,944 2,822,839 5,3BI,O58 Other Financing Use. 3,1O6,B18 2,034,372 9,253.BI3 11.425,326 9,B31 ,358 10,111,560 7,B64,'B7 1 7,B64,9B7 0.0% Ending Fund Balance Solid Wa,te Snow & ice Arterial Street UtilityTa> SWM Path & Trail, Strategic Re'eNe Debt SeNice D"ma, Bay Centre Police P3 Interrond Loan, 29',B42 100,000 34',431 2,B30,14B 1,643,113 22,353 2.02B,2O4 5.74B.SOB 47.775 T4B.ISO 300,000 10,000 1 4.009,345 196.303 95.575 456,790 4.944.6B4 B12,213 31.474 2.033,B32 4,561,433 35.T45 BOO,229 300,000 10,000 I 7,343,942 192.137 100.000 715,3B2 6.158,921 500,230 41.e4B, .1 6,505,e7g I 63,775 604,131 I 300,000 ¡ 10,000 125,460 100,000 276.0B6 100,000 I.B91.6B5 4.305,470 30T.630 44,992 "-'a "-'a "-'a "-'a "-'a "-'a "-'a "-'a "-'a "-'a 296,991 73,358 470.902 B,160,052 411,901 SO,B4e 4,613,267 41B,B30 669.334 300.000 10,000 I 216 :1 06/2012O021116AM f-('ð MEETING DATE: . July2,'2J;ô2- ITEM# ..J[:' C£:) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Amendment to the Federal Way City Code, Chapter 22, related to non conforming single family residential uses. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [8J ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit AA - Staff Report to the Land Use and Transportation Committee, titled (City of Federal Way Planning Commission Recommendation to the Land Use & Transportation Committee), with: Exhibit A - Citizen requests for a Code amendment; Exhibit B - Staff Report to the Planning Commission, wlout exhibits; Exhibit C - Ordinance approving amendments to Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code to address nonconforming single family residential structures, not attached; Exhibit D - Ordinance approving amendments to Chapter 22 ofthe Federal Way City Code to address nonconforming single family residential uses, with Exhibit 0-1; and, Exhibit E - Resolution denying amendments to Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code to address nonconforming single family residential uses. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: In 1998, Mr. Roger Hyppa submitted two letters to the City Council requesting a Code amendment which would allow the expansion of a residential use in a zone where residential uses are currently not allowed (e.g. residential use in the Business park zone). As part of the Year 2001 Planning Commission work program, Staff provided analysis outlining arguments for and against allowing the expansion of a non-conforming residential use. Based on the Planning Commission's direction, staff prepared a Code amendment for the Planning Commission's review which would allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential use beyond what is currently allowed by the Code. The Land Use and Transportation Committee met on June 3, 2002, reyiewed the Planning Commission's recommendation regarding to the proposed Code amendment related to nonconforming single family uses, recommended a change of the 12-month period to a 36-month period for determining whether an existing nonconforming use must be corrected, and recommended adoption of the proposed Code amendment with that change. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code to address nonconforming single family residential uses. PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye the proposed ordinance to second reading and enactment at the next regular meeting on July 2, 2002." ~~;~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:....~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: t:1 APPROVED [J DENIED D TABLEDfDEFERRED/NO ACTION ~ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) . REVIS~~/~~ 2, WOl f(J9uJlJfmedJAð COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ~9P' 6/1J>;/tJ ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE TO ADDRESS NONCONFORMING SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL USES WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July, 1996, which significantly revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter 22 (Zoning). WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendment to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), to allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses, will proyide for improyed reyiew processes. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way fmds that the code amendment to allow the expansion ofa non- conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses will implement and is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non significance for the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses on August II, 2001; and WHEREAS, no comments or appeals were receiyed prior to the established SEPA deadlines of August 27, 2001, and September 10,2001, respectiyely, and the initial Determination of Nonsignificance became final without modification; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the code amendment relating to the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential use located in a ORD# ,PAGE I '. -'. .. . LiU ,.:'\~: (q(( / ð '- zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses on May 15, 2002, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses, on June 3, 2002, following which it recommended adoption of the text amendment. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses is consistent with the intent and purpose of FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning) to proyide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council ofthe City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendment will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section I, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposal: I. The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with, and substantially implements, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUPIO Support a diverse community comprised of neighborhoods which provide a range of housing options; a vibrant City Center: well designed andfunctioning commercial areas; and distinctive retail areas. LUPII Support the continuation of a strong residential community. ORD# , PAGE 2 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because it will enable existing residential uses which became nonconforming upon incorporation to upgrade or otherwise enhance or renovate the property and or structure in a manner similar to what is allowed if the subject property were located in a residential zone. The renovation and/or modernization of existing structures makes these structures safer and more liyable, which has a direct relationships to the public health, safety, and welfare; and 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest ofthe residents of the city because it affords those residents whose property became nonconforming as a result of incorporation to renoyate or make changes to their property in a manner similar to what is allowed of residents who's property is located in a residential zone. Section 3. Amendment. FWCC, Chapter 22 'is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit D-I. Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are deciared separate and seyerable. The inyalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the yalidity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the yalidity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effectiye date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effectiye Date. This ordinance shall be effective fiye (5) days after passage and publication as proyided by law. ORD# , PAGE 3 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting ofthe City Council on the - day of ,2002. ApPROVED: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, BOB STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY TIlE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No.: ORD# , PAGE 4 Exhibit D-1 22-338 Special provisions for residential nses If the subject property contains a residential use that became nonconforming as to use or density as a result of the adoption of this chapter, the following regulations apply: (I) If the improvements on the subject property are damaged or destroyed by any sudden cause, the structure may be rebuilt; provided, that the number of dwelling units and the gross floor area in and on the subject property may not be increased from that which existed immediately prior to the damage or destruction and any other nonconformity of or on the subject property may not in any way be increased. The provisions of this subsection are OIùy available if the applicant applies for a building permit within 12 months after the sudden damage or destruction and construction is commenced and completed under that building permit. (2) Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must be corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations or doing other work, other than normal maintenance, in any 12-month period to any structure on the subject property containin!! multi-unit housin!! (attached and/or stacked dwellin!! units) and fair market yalue of these changes, alterations or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised yalue of that multi-unit structure. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improyement '.vhish has esse damaged. The appraisal must be from a source that is acceptable to the city. The community development director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a source acceptable to the city if the assessed yaluation appears to be inappropriate. If an appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the city, the larger of the two amounts shall be used. Chan!!es. alterations additions or other work is subiect to all applicable reQuirements of the Federal Way Citv Code includin!! but not limited to orovisions related to Enyironmentally Sensitiye Areas iFWCC Art. XIV) Off-street Parkin!! iFWCC Art. XV) Imoroyements (FWCC Art. XVI). and Landscaoin!! (FWCC Art. XVII). (3) Other than as soecified in subsection (I) of this section. the nonconformin!! use or densitY must be corrected if the aoolicant is makin!! chan!!es. altetations addin!! improyements or doin!! other work. other than normal maintenance. in any 36-month oeriod on the subiect orooertv containin!! a sin!!le- family use and fair market yalue of these chan!!es. alterations. additions or other work exceeds 75 percent of the assessed or aooraised value of that sin!!le-family structure. Chan!!es. alterations. additions or other work must comoly with all bulk dimensional and other deyelooment reQuirements for a sin!!le familv detached dwell in!! located in the RS 7.2 zone (FWCC 22-631). The aoolicant may oroyide an aporaisal of the imorovement. The aooraisal must be from a source that is acceotable to the citY. The communitY deyelooment director may reQuire the aoolicant to oroyide an aooraisal ITom a source acceotable to the citY if the assessed yaluation aooears to be inaoorooriate. If an aooraisal is oroyided bv the apolicant or reQuired by the citY the lar!!er of the two amounts shall be used. Chan!!es alterations additions or other work is subiect to all aoolicable reQuirements of the Federal Wav CitY Code includin!! but not limited to oroyisions related to Environmentally Sensitive Areas (FWCC Art. XIV). Off-street Parkin!! (FWCC Art. XV) Imoroyements (FWCC Art. XVI) and Landscaoin!! (FWCC Art. XVll). ORD# ,PAGE 5 EXHIBIT AA CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA TTON June 3, 2002 To: FROM: Eric Faison, Chair land Use/Trãnsportation Committee (LUTe) Greg Fe.l>.VDeputy Director of Community Development Services DaYid~, CP, Senior Planner, Madrona Planning & Deyelopment Services VIA: DaYid Moseley, SUBJECT: Amendments Federa Way City Code (FWCC) relating to single family residential non-conforming structures (FWCC 22-334) and single family residential nonconforming residential uses (FWCC 22-3.38). I. BACKGROUND In 1998, Mr. Roger Hyppa submitted two letters to the City Council requesting a Code amendment that would allow the expansion of a residential use in a zone where residential uses are currently not allowed (attached as Exhibit A). Þs part of the Year 2001 Planning Commission work progrãm, Staff provided analysis outlining arguments for and against allowing the expansion of a non-conforming residential use. Based on the Planning Commission's direction, staff prepared a Code amendment for the Planning Commission's reyiew which would allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential use beyond what is currently allowed by the Code. Additionally, based on discussions with staff and inquiries from members of the public, staff also prepared a Code amendment related to nonconforming residential structures for the Planning Commission's review and recommendation. u. PROPOSAL The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and deliberated on May 15, 2002. There were tWo proposed Code amendments before the Planning Commission. One is related to nonconforming single family residential strvctures, under FWCC 22-334. The second proposed Code amendment is related to nonconforming single family residential uses, under FWCC 22-338. Staff recommended to the Planning Commission that the proposed Code amendment related to nonconforming structures be adopted. Staff recommended that the proposed Code amendment related to nonconforming uses not be adopted. The staff report to the Planning Commission is included as Exhibit B. The proposal before the Planning Commission related to nonconforming single family residential structures would allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, so long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded. The proposed code amendment would clarify and expand existing Code proyisions contained in FWCC 22-334. The proposed Code amendment is outlined in Section III. A proposed Ordinance adopting the Code amendment is attached as ExhlbJtC EXHIBiT AA The proposal before the Planning Commission related to noncorD~ale fa11ily ~tial 4 uses would allow the expansion of a non-conforming single fanJíý~~~ currently provided for under section 22-338. A nonconforming single family use is one which is located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses. Under the proposed Code amendment, an existing nonconforming residential use could be increased by expanding and/or renovating the existing structure and/or the addition of other improvements on the site. Any expansion, addition, or improvement would be required to meet the development standards such as lot coyerage and required yards of the RS 7.2 single family zoning designation. The proposed code amendment would expand existing Code provisions contained in FWCC 22- 338. The proposed Code amendment is outlined in Section III. A proposed Ordinance adopting the Code amendment is attached as Exhibit D. A proposed Resolution to not adopt the Code amendment is attached as Exhibit £ Changes to the existing Code language are shown as stfikeet¡t (deletions) and double-underline (proposed additions). III. PLANNING COMMISSION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION a. NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the proposed text amendment to FWCC 22- 334 (nonconforming structures) as presented by staff. Staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission was to adopt the provision related to non conforming residential structures. Changes to the existing Code language are shown as stfikeet¡t (deletions) and double-underline (proposed additions): 22-334 Nonconforming development. If any aspect, structure, improyement or development does not conform to the development regulations prescribed in this chapter, that aspect, structure, improvement or deyelopment must be brought into conformance or otherwise improved as set forth below. (1) Change of use - Single-tenant site. If any applicant proposes a change of use on property used or occupied by a single tenant or use, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These proYisions shall apply to the entire site. (2) Change of use - Multi-tenant site. If an applicant proposes a change of use on only a portion of property occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These provisions shall apply only to that geographic portion of the site related to the use or tenant space on which the change is proposed. (3) Increase in gross floor area. If an applicant proposes to increase the gross floor area of any use on the subject property in anyone of the following ways, the applicant shall comply with the development regulations in effect at the time of the proposal, as specified below: a. If expansion of gross floor area of an existing building occurs either through addition of new floors within the structure or enlargement of the existing building footprint, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations in effect at the time the expansion is proposed. If the property on which the expansion is proposed is occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall comply with those development regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the expansion is proposed; or b. If a new and separate structure is being constructed on an already developed site, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations app~I~.to,U'\e..9.e<1graphic portion of the site on which the new structure and any relatJ::!1~~t:i are tn hp PAGE~OF. Page 2 At>. 4 constructed; or ~ If the increase in oross floor area inyolyes an existina sino Ie family residential dwellina the aoolicant shall comolv with the develooment reoulations in effect at the time of the orooosal For sinole family residences existina nonconformities may remain and continue so lone as the existina nonconformities are not beina increased or exoanded in any way New construction or renovation which involyes the increase in DroSS floor area of a nonconformina sinale family structure is subject to all aoolicable reQuirements of the Federal Way CitY Code includino but not limited to orovisions related to Environmentallv Sensitiye Areas (FWCC Art XIV) Off-street Parkino (FWCC Art 'XI/) Imorovements (FWCC Art XVI) and Landscaoina (FWCC Art XVIn. b. NONCONFORMING USES The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the proposed text amendment to FWCC 22- 338 (nonconforming uses) as presented by staff. Note that staff did not recommend adoption of the proYision related to non-conforming single-family uses. Changes to the existing Code language are shown as sffikeetff (deletions) and double-underline (proposed additions): 22-338 Special provisions for residential uses If the subject property contains a residential use that became nonconforming as to use or density as a result of the adoption of this chapter, the following regulations apply: (1) If the improyements on the subject property are damaged or destroyed by any sudden cause, the structure may be rebuilt; proYided, that the number of dwelling units and the gross floor area in and on the subject property may not be increased from that which existed immediately prior to the damage or destruction and any other nonconformity of or on the subject property may not in any way be increased. The provisions of this subsection are only ayailable if the applicant applies for a building permit within 12 months after the sudden damage or destruction and construction is commenced and completed under that building permit. (2) Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must be corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations or doing other work, other than normal maintenance, in any 12-month period to any structure on the subject property ~ multi-unit housino (attached and/or stacked dwellina units) and fair market value of these changes, alterations or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that multi-unit structure. The applicant may proyide an appraisal of the improyement wAich Aas !'JeeR ~. The appraisal must be from a source that is acceptable to the city. The community development director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a source acceptable to the city if the assessed valuation appears to be inappropriate. If an appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the city, the larger of the two amounts shall be used. ~ alterations additions or other work is subject to all aoolicable reouirements of the Federal Way CitY Code incJudino but not limited to orovisions related to Environmentallv Sensitive Areas (FWCC Art XIV) Off-street Parkino (FWCC Art 'XI/) Imorovements (FWCC Art 'XI/n and Landscaoino (FWCC Art 'XI/rn (3) Other than as soecified in subsection (1) of this section the nonconformina use or densitY must be corrected if the aoolicant is makina chances alterations addina imorovements or doina Q.ther work other than normal maintenance in any 12-month oeriod on the subject orooertv containinc a sinale-familv use and fair market value of these chances. alterations additions or other work exceeds 75 oercent of the assessed or ¡¡J~¡!!~'~lPe'~~~i~ ~t~re Chances,.Q]terMions additions or other work mus-u; m' . n r ÂA deJælQomenLreauirements.fur..a.s.incle family detÇtcbeQ.~. . .- - t"'Ut:~- lJl-- 4 Pa~c 3 IV. V. (FWCC 22-631), The aoolicant may oroYide an aooraisal of the imorovement The aooraisal must be from a source that is acceotable to the citY The communitY develooment director may reQuire the aoolicant to oroYide an aooraisal from a source acceotable to the citY if the assessed yaluation aooears to be inaoorooriate If an aooraisal is orovided bv the aoolicant or reQuired bv the citY the laroer of the two amounts shall be used ChanGes alterations additions or other work is subject to all aoolicable reQuirements of the Federal Way CitY Code includinG but not limited to oroYisions related to EnYironmentaliv Sensitive Areas (FWCC Art XIV)' Off-street Parkino (FWCC Art XV) Imorovements (FWCC Art XVI) and Landscaoino (FWCC Art XVII) COUNCIL AcnON/STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Committee has the following options: 1. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-334 (nonconforming single family residential structures) as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approYing the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-338 (nonconforming single family residential uses) as recommended by the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve one or both of the proposed code amendments, 4. Recommend that the full Council disapproye one or both of the proposed code amendments. Staff recommends that the Committee adopt the Planning Commission recommendation and recommend to the full Council Option No.1; that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-334 (nonconforming single family residential structures); and Staff recommends that the Committee recommend to the full Council Option No.4; that the full Council not adopt an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-338 (nonconforming single family residential uses) and adopt a resolution not adopting the proposed Code amendment. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMmEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows: :z As recommended by Planning Commission. As recommended by Planning Commission and amended by the LUTe. Uno'Exhtbtts E,hiMA "hibit B E,hibitC Exhibit 0 E'hibitE t/ L'tt'~ 'com Ropec Hyp,", dot'" May 19 & J"n, I, l"e M" IS, 2002 Staff R'POrt to th, "'nning Comm""on P'opo<e< O"""n" adopting ame""m,n~ to fWCC 22-334 Pcopœed O,din"" adOPting am",dmen" to fWCC 22-338 Propo<ed R"""tion not adopting am"""",",, to fWCC 22-33 EXHIBIT AA PAGE~OF 4- Page 4 . .' .- 0 E.CE.\\1E.O BY All ß ~~OE'l13-0?\'\6'i' \)E? .-. to\þ.'1 2l1 \99ß EXHIBIT A May 19, 1998 """- - Phil Watkins, Chairman Land Use/Transportation Committee Dear Mr. Watkins, I was raised on a piece of property in Federal Way located at 1816 S. 340th. We have owned this residence for 48 years. My mother recently passed away, and upon listing the property for sale, I learned that it had been rezoned Business Park. This was done without any formal notification to any of the & residences on this road. I would like to address the committee at their next meeting on Monday, June 1, at 5:30 P.M. At this time I would request a code .admentment so that I could construct a garage. I would take no more than 5 minutes of the committee's time to explain the unique situation. of this property. I am hoping you will offer me this opportunity. Sincerely, Roger Hyppa 20136 47th Ave. N.E. Lake Forest Park, Wa. 98155 (206) 364-0857 cc Ken Nyberg Greg Moore (¿,/~/?8' - l11a~, 0 rYJ fh- ~(/V -h ieç. AJJeJ -b 1!ü- PI C/ 1111 ~ &/11 I1H5 u(7Y( (/LJÐ-rK:'j!l.V~1 V'tlWl ()l'tJør- 1111 sQ)<HIBI~ A. ...PA.~ RECEIVED :;'> C "199& June I, 1998 20136 47th Ave. N.E. Seattle, Wa. 98155 ''It o~ FE..JERAL WAY vI BUti_DING DEPT. Phil Watkins, Chairman Land Use/Transportation Committee Federal Way, Wa. Dear Mr. Watkins, The property at 1816 South 340th was purchased in 1950 by my parents. It has been our residence for 48 years. Upon listing the residence for sale, I was informed by the real estate agent that it was zoned (B.P.) Business Park. I have since learned that no formal notification of change in zoning was given to any of the residents on this street. have been informed by the City of Federal Way staff that this was legal. However, if legal, I would say it was quite unethical. It was stated it would have been too much of a task to notify all residents of such a change; There are 5 houses on this street. The current value**of this property as B.P. is approxi- mately $100,000. However, it is virtually impossible to find someone interested in this small of a piece of property for B.P. use. The current value** of the property as a single family residence is approximately $135,00 to $140,00. As you can see, the value of this property is much greater as a home than as B.P. at this time. There is vacant B.P. property to the south of 340th street that has been sitting vacant for many years. **Value established by Bill Drew-Windermere Real Estate EXHIBIT A PAGE-L-OF. 3> Page 2 The nonconformance (Sec. 22-3404) prohbitioIl on increasing nonconformance which prohibits adding on the residence or adding a garage seems totally too restrictive. Because of these restrictions, I have lost two potential sales of this home. In essence, the city. of Federal Way has devalued the property by $40,000. Further, you have placed me on a strangle hold. I am unable to sell because the city has taken away my right to use this property as a residence until it is ready to be developed as B.P. To remedy this situation, I request that Sec. 22-3404 and all relating sections prohibiting the enlargement and expansion of this single family residence be waived or grandfathered, so that its use may continue until such time that it is feasible to transfer into B.P. property. Sincerely, ~!f:rr- (206) 364-0857 cc Ken Nyberg Greg Moore EXHIBIT A PAGE--LO~ - 3 EXHIBIT B STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE (FWCC) AMENDMENTS: Expansion of Nonconforming Residential Uses and Expansion of Nonconforming Residential Structures Planning Commission Meeting of May 15,2002 I. INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission met on June 20 and July 18,2001 to discuss a Code amendment which would allow existing nonconforming single family residential uses to expand. Howeyer, while public testimony was taken, a public hearing on the proposed Code amendment was not held. Based on the Planning Commission's discussions, staff has reviewed the existing Code proyisions related to residential nonconformities and made seyeral clarifying changes/additions to the preyious proposed Code amendment, Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-338. The text of the proposed Code amendment is attached as Exhibit A. Based on other nonproject-specific questions from members ofthe public and City Staff, proyisions related to nonconforming single family structures were also reviewed. Staff has prepared an addition to FWCC 22-334 to proyide a limited exemption to allow additions to existing nonconforming single family residential structures (also attached as Exhibit A). To aid in your review, background information on the specific Code amendments is provided below, diyided into sections related to nonconforming residential uses and nonconforming residential structures. Please keep in mind that nonconforming is a descriptiye term in the planning context and does not necessarily have a negative connotation. It merely refers to a use or structure which was legally created, but due to a change in zoning, has become inconsistent with the current code provisions applicable to the property and/or zone in which the property is located. II. NONCONFORMING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES A. BACKGROUND Mr. Hyppa's Request: In 1998, Mr. Hyppa submitted a letter to the City Council requesting a code amendment that would allow the expansion of a residential use in a zone where residential uses are currently not allowed. Specifically, Mr. Hyppa desires to add a stand-alone garage to an existing residence in a Business Park (BP) zone. Mr. Hyppa owns property located east of Pacific Highway South, between EXHIBIT 13 PAGE-LOF.. 10 South 336th and South 344th Streets, in a Business Park (BP) zone. Single-family or multi-family residential uses are not currently allowed in the BP zone. There are a number of single-family residences in this area that are a yestige of past development and King County's zoning. Adoption of Zoning Code: Upon incorporation of the City of Federal Way, the City adopted its own zoning regulations and designation for all properties within the City. During the months of January and February of 1990, prior to the adoption of the zoning code, the City held numerous public meetings to solicit public input on the proposed changes to the land use code and zoning map. The issue of nonconforming uses was specifically contemplated at that time, and a special provision for residential uses was enacted. The special proyision for residential uses has been reyiewed four times, since its adoption in 1990. Each time, a public hearing was held, in addition to reyiew by the Planning Commission and City Council. Each time, the decision by the Council was to leaye the proyision in substantially the same form as it exists today. In 1991, maintenance work was exempted from the calculation of improyements that would trigger conformance, and in 1997, a 90-day abandonment proyision and l80-day cessation of actiyity proyision was deleted from the section. Special Proyisions for Residential Uses: FWCC, Section 22-338 proyides as follows: Ifthe subject property contains a residential use that became nonconforming as to use or density as a result of the adoption of this chapter, the following regulations apply: (I) If the improyements on the subject property are damaged or destroyed by any sudden cause, the structure may be rebuilt; proyided, that the number of dwelling units and the gross floor area in and on the subject property may not be increased from that which existed immediately prior to the damage or destruction, and any other nonconformity of or on the subject property may not in any way be increased. The provisions of this subsection are only available if the applicant applies for a building permit within 12 months after the sudden damage or destruction, and construction is commenced and completed under that building permit. (2) Other than as specified in Subsection (I) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must be corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations or doing other work, other than normal maintenance, in any l2-month period to any structure on the subject property and fair market value of these changes, alterations or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that structure. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improyement that has been damaged. The appraisal must be from a source that is Planning Commission Staff Report EXMlB1J B> Page 2 Expansion OfNonconf'AtI~ial ~S!St:OF- 10 acceptable to the City. The Community Deyelopment Director may require the applicant to proyide an appraisal from a source acceptable to the City, if the assessed yaluation appears to be inappropriate. If an appraisal is proyided by the applicant or required by the City, the larger of the two amounts shall be used. B. ANALYSIS Staff is proyiding the following analysis outlining arguments for and against allowing additional exceptions to the Nonconformance chapter of the Zoning Code, to allow for additional expansion of nonconforming residential uses in non- residential zones. Staff has also incorporated seyeral additions to the proposed amendment to Sec 22- 338 related to nonconforming residential uses. While staff does not support the oyerall amendment to Sec 22-338, staff made the addition to 22-338(2) to distinguish between nonconforming single family and nonconforming multi-family uses and to ensure the designation of a multi -family use is consistent with the Code definition. The purpose of the proposed addition 22-338(2) is to make clear that any change in an existing nonconforming single family use is subject to all applicable requirements of the Code including proyisions related to Enyironmentally Sensitiye AIeas, parking, improyements, and landscaping. A nonconforming use is a use which lawfully existed prior to the enactment of a zoning ordinance, and which is maintained after the effective date of the ordinance, although it does not comply with the zoning restrictions applicable to the district in which it is situated. The right to continue a nonconforming use despite a zoning ordinance that prohibits such a use in the area is sometimes referred to as a "protected" or "yested" right. This right, howeyer, refers only to the right not to haye the use immediately terminated in the face of a zoning ordinance that prohibits the use. University Place v. McGuire, 102 Wn. App. 658, 9 P.3d 918 (2000), citing Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish County, 136 Wn.2d 1,6,959 P.2d 1024 (1998). The preyailing public policy is to seyerely limit if not abolish nonconforming uses. Anderson v. Island County, 81 Wn.2d 312, 501 P.2d 594 (1972); Bartz v. Board of Adjustment, 80 Wn. 2d 209, 492 P.2d1374 (1972); Coleman v. Walla Walla, 44 Wn.2d 296, 266 P.2d 1034 (1954). Nonconforming uses are uniformly disfavored and the Washington courts haye repeatedly acknowledged the desirability of eliminating such uses. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish County, at 1028, citing Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 92 Wn.2d 905,920,602 P.2d 1177 (1979). The ultimate purpose of zoning ordinances is to confine certain classes of buildings and uses to certain localities. The continued existence of those that are nonconforming is inconsistent with that object. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Planning Commission Staff Report 13 10 Snohomish County, at 1027, citing State ex rel. Miller v. Cain, 40 Wn. 2d 216, 221, 242 P.2d 505 (1952). The court in Anderson v. Island County held: . . . it is contemplated that conditions should be reduced to conformity as completely and as speedily as possible with due regard to the special interest of those concerned and that where suppression is not feasible without working substantial injustice, there shall be accomplished the greatest possible amelioration of the offending use which justice permits... The generally accepted method of eliminating nonconforming uses is to preyent any increase in the nonconformity and, when changes in the premises are contemplated... to compel a lessening or complete suppression of the nonconformity. The theory of the zoning ordinance is that the nonconforming use is detrimental to public interests such as health, safety, or welfare. Commentators agree that nonconforming uses limit the effectiyeness ofland-use-controls, imperil the success of community plans and injure property values. Id. at 1028, citing I R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning Sec. 6.02 and R. Settle, Washington Land Use Sec. 2.7 (d). Although found to be detrimental to important public interests, nonconforming uses are allowed to continue based on the belief that it would be unfair to require an immediate cessation of a nonconforming use. Howeyer, "[i]t was not and is not contemplated that preexisting nonconforming uses are to be perpetual." Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish County, at 1028, citing State ex. ReI. Miller v. Cain, at 505. Therefore, while status as a nonconforming use generally grants the right to continue the existing use, it does not grant the right to significantly change, alter, extend, or enlarge the existing use. Id. at 1027. In summary, Washington courts permit the "intensification" of nonconforming uses, but not the "enlargement." This requires that the character of the use remain unchanged, substantially the same facilities be used, and the use not differ in kind from the nonconforming use. Keller v. City of Bellingham, 92 Wn.2d 726, 600 P.2d 1276 (1979); Meridian Minerals v. King County, 61 Wn. App. 195,810 P.2d 31(1991). 1. Pros: It is generally accepted that a nonconforming use should be allowed to continue for some period after enactment of the ordinance making the use nonconforming to preyent a substantial injustice. Additionally, there may be situations in which it is appropriate to encourage the stability and expansion of nonconforming residential uses, such as in an area in transition. For example, in an area where industrial or heavy commercial uses are no longer viable due to a lack of appropriate infrastructure, nonconforming residential uses may be allowed to enlarge or expand and new residences deyelop as a transition to a more mixed neighborhood with residential uses and lighter commercial and retail uses takes place. Such a Planning Commission StatTRepnrt 13 to scenario, howeyer, would typically be accomplished by a zoning amendment to legalize the nonconforming residential uses and create incentiyes for lighter commercial, retail or mixed uses. 2. Cons: First, contrary to the above, Mr. Hyppa's nonconforming use is not being threatened with immediate termination. It has been nonconforming for oyer 10 years and, as long as the use is continued without enlargement, it may continue as a nonconforming use. Second, contrary to the above, where it was noted that allowing an expansion of nonconforming residential uses can sometimes proyide a transition to less intensive uses, the exact opposite is the case here. In this type of case, where the residential use is a yestige of past zoning and deyelopment patterns, and the current zoning is directed to more intensive industrial uses, the general policy is to prohibit nonconforming uses from expanding so as to facilitate light industrial development. Third, the prevailing public policy is to seyerely limit, if not abolish, nonconforming uses. Nonconforming uses limit the effectiveness of land- use-controls, imperil the success of community plans and injure property values. Fourth, the uses allowed in the BP zone are vehicle intensiye and noisy, potentially operating 24-hours per day. Uses allowed in the BP zone include stone cutting, industrial laundry facilities, manufacturing, research and deyelopment facilities, hazardous waste storage and treatment, chemical manufacturing, warehouse, and wholesale distribution. These uses generate impacts that are generally incompatible with single-family residences. Allowing a single family use to extend it's life by expansion increases the possibility of conflicts. Fifth, the City has a finite supply ofland ayailable for more intensive heayy commercial uses. Allowing nonconforming residential uses to enlarge or expand in these areas reduces the likelihood that the properties will become ayailable for redevelopment by a more intensive use as intended by the Comprehensiye Plan and Zoning Code. Sixth, FWCC, Section 22-338 currently contains a special provision for residential uses. The existing code allows normal maintenance, alterations, or other work on the structure, so long as the fair market yalue of the proposed change does not exceed 50 percent of the assessed or appraised yalue of the existing structure. Thus, Mr. Hyppa could make changes and/or add on to the existing structure, so long as the change or addition conforms to the deyelopment standards for the underlying zone, such as setbacks and Planning Commission Staff Report EXHIBIT B Page 5 Expansion ofNonconfOpiÄ GdËI5~t'ð~ D height, ånd the change or addition does not exceed 50 percent of the assessed or appraised yalue of the structure. The existing code proyisions would allow construction of an attached garage, but not allow a new detached garage to be constructed. c. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWCC Section 22-528 proyides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria proyided by FWCC Section 22-528. The City may amend the text of the FWCC only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential uses is not consistent with the Comprehensiye Plan, because allowing the additional expansion of nonconforming residential uses beyond what is currently allowed by the Code is contrary to the following Comprehensiye Plan goals and policies: LUP29 Provide for a mixture of commercial and residential uses in commercial areas, except Business Park and Office. LUG5 Develop a quality business park area that supports surrounding commercial areas. LUP36 Develop business parks which fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare; and The proposed FWCC text amendments lack any substantial relationship, and negatiyely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. Nonconforming residential uses are currently proyided a special exception under the current Code to make alterations, renoyations or changes, within certain parameters. This expansion is limited to encourage the re-deyelopment of the area to a more intensiye use as allowed by the Code. Any further expansion of these structures increases the potential for conflict between a residential use (not currently allowed) and a more intensiye industrial, commercial or office use (which is allowed). The City has designated the BP zone for intensiye commercial uses, which potentially generate noise, odors, light and traffic impacts, in an area with easy access to Interstate 5, the major transportation corridor. Encouraging the further enhancement and Planning Commission Staff Report ~Il ß Page 6 Expansion ofNonconfo PAGËal UsZStruð~ lQ entrenchment of nonconforming residential uses in the BP zone will preclude the siting and or expansion of business, commercial or office deyelopment, and will not further the public health, safety, and welfare. 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents ofthe city. The proposed FWCC text amendments related to nonconforming residential uses are not in the best interest of the residents of the City, because encouraging the further enhancement and entrenchment of nonconforming residential uses in areas designated for more intensiye business, commercial or office deyelopments will increase conflicts between the uses and preclude the location and or expansion of commercial deyelopments. Business, commercial and office deyelopments generate tax revenues for the City and proyide jobs to the City's residents. A City needs a mixture of residential and non-residential uses to function properly. D. RECOMMENDA TION Based on the aboye, staffrecommends not allowing additional expansion of nonconforming residential uses in non-residential zones beyond that already allowed under FWCC Section, 22-338. The uses currently allowed in the BP zone are not generally compatible with residential uses. As the remaining supply ofBP land deyelops, surrounding residences in the BP zone will be seyerely impacted. The nonconforming residential uses within the BP zone should be encouraged to relocate, in order to increase the supply of available BP-zoned land, and aid in the economic deyelopment of the City to benefit all its residents. Allowing the expansion of nonconforming residential uses would be contrary to this goal, and to preyailing public policy. III. NONCONFORMING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES A. BACKGROUND & PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT It is important to distinguish between uses and structures. Non conforming structures are those structures located in a zone, containing an allowed use, where a portion of the structure may not comply with the current deyelopment regulations. For example, the ITont of the structure, when constructed, did comply with the front setback requirement. Howeyer, due to an expansion of the right-of-way, the front yard dimension has decreased or, due to the change in zoning from King County to the City of Federal Way, the ITont yard requirement has increased, the front of the structure is now within the required front yard setback and is thus nonconforming. Planning Commission Staff Report Under the current Code, a property owner is precluded from expanding the gross floor area of a nonconforming single family structure unless the nonconformance is brought into conformity. FWCC Sec 22-334 requires that an improyement must comply with all deyelopment regulations in effect at the time the expansion is proposed (FWCC 22-334). Most jurisdictions allow additions to legal EXHlBn Page 7 Expansion ofNonconfpÄ~~ial ~s/Strð'F=- B I'D nonconforming single family structures, so long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded. Using the example aboye: a property owner who's house is nonconforming as to the front setback is precluded from adding on to the rear of the house unless the existing nonconformity is corrected, under the current provisions of the Code. The proposed addition to Sec. 22-334, applicable only to single family structures, would allow an expansion of the structure, so long as the portion of the structure which is nonconforming is in no way enlarged or expanded, and the proposed addition complies with all provisions of the Code. The following is the proposed Code language: "If the increase in gross floor area involyes an existing single family residential dwelling, the applicant shall comply with the deyelopment regulations in effect at the time of the proposal. For single family residences, existing nonconformities may remain and continue so long as the existing nonconformities are not being increased or expanded in any way. New construction or renovation which inyolves the increase in gross floor area of a nonconforming single family structure is subject to all applicable requirements of the Federal Way City Code including but not limited to proyisions related to Enyironmentally Sensitiye Areas (FWCC Art. XIV), Off-street Parking (FWCC Art. XV), Improyements (FWCC Art. XVI), and Landscaping (FWCC Art. XVII)." B. ANALYSIS Staff is proyiding the following analysis outlining arguments for and against allowing the expansion of a nonconforming single family residential structure in a single family residential zone. 1. Pros: It is generally accepted that a nonconforming single family residential structure be allowed to expand so long as the extent of the nonconformity is not expanded and so long as the expansion conforms to all applicable proyision of the code such as building setbacks/yard requirements, height, and enyironmentally sensitiye area regulations. Enabling a homeowner to expand or in other ways renoyate their dwelling preserves and enhances the character of a neighborhood. As long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is not expanded and any proposed expansion complies with the applicable proyisions of the Code, negatiye impacts to the surrounding neighbors and the neighborhood oyer and aboye general development impacts are expected to be minimal or non existent. 'B Planning Commission Staff Report Page 8 Expansion ofNonconfo si en 1a seSlS!ruC!üieš. PAGE_ø ('\c -. .1.9-- 2. Cons: There are those situations where, for example, a single family dwelling is built so close to a property line that its presence intrudes on the neighboring property regardless of the expansion being constructed consistent with the Code. By allowing nonconforming structures to be renoyated or expanded without bring the nonconformity into compliance with the Code, the nonconformance and any impacts associated with it are prolonged. The underlying policy regarding nonconformities is that they should be brought into compliance and not allowed to remain in perpetuity. However, the Code does proyide that a non-conforming structure must be brought into conformance if"[t]he applicant is making any alteration or changes or doing any work, other than normal maintenance or other than tenant improvements, in anyone consecutiye l2-month period to an improvement that is nonconforming and the fair market yalue of the alteration, change or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that improyement" (FWCC 22-334(6)) Thus while a new kitchen or bedroom addition may not trigger the 50% threshold, a more complete renoyation of a single family dwelling would require that the nonconformance be brought into compliance with the Code. c. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWCC Section 22-528 proyides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria proyided by FWCC Section 22-528. The City may amend the text of the FWCC only if it finds that: I. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable proyisions of the comprehensive plan; The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential structures (FWCC 22-334) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, because allowing the expansion of nonconforming residential structures, so long as the nonconformity is not increased or expanded and the proposed addition is consistent with all aspects of the FWCC, is consistent with the following Comprehensiye Plan goals and policies: LUG] Preserve and protect Federal Way's single family neighborhoods. HGI Preserve and protect the quality of existing residential neighborhoods and require new development to be of a scale and design that is compatible with existing neighborhood character. Planning Commission Staff Report ß Page 9 Expansion ofNonconfoPAG~al US';StruÕF- ID 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare; and The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential structures bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare because if facilitates the renoyation of existing nonconforming single family residential structures, so long as the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded or enlarged. The proposed addition must meet all aspects of the FWCC would be consistent with opportunities provided to all other properties. 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest ofthe residents ofthe City. The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential structures is in the best interest ofthe residents of the City, because it affords owners of single family residential structures the flexibility to renoyate and modernize existing nonconforming structures in a manner which will not increase or expand the extent of the existing nonconformity. Well kept and modem single family houses and neighborhoods have a positiye impact on the City's residents and the image of the City. D. RECOMMENDA TION Staff does recommend approyal ofthe proposed Code amendment related to nonconforming residential structures (FWCC 22-334), to afford property owners the maximum flexibility in the upkeep and renovation of their property, so long as the extent of any nonconformity is not increased or expanded in any way. Planning Commission Staff Report EXH1B IT 13 Page 10 Expansion ofNonconfi5~~ial ~~/Strð'~ to EXHIBIT D CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ORDINANCE NO. 02 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE TO ADDRESS NONCONFORMING SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL USES WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July, 1996, which significantly reyised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter 22 (Zoning). WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendment to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses, will proyide for improyed reyiew processes. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses will implement and is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Detennination of Non significance for the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses on August II, 2001; and WHEREAS, no comments or appeals were received prior to the established SEPA deadlines of August 27, 2001, and September 10, 2001, respectiyely, and the initial Detennination of Nonsignificance became final without modification; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the code amendment relating to the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential use located in a zoning EXHIBIl þ PAGE-LOF.. 5' district which does not allow single family residential uses on May 15,2002, and forwatded a recommendation of approyal to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses, on June 3, 2002, following which it recommended adoption of the text amendment. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses is consistent with the intent and purpose of FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning) to proyide for and promote the health, safety, and welfate of the general public. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Findings. After full and cateful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendment will protect and will not adyersely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposal: I. The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with, and substantially implements, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUPiO Support a diverse community comprised of neighborhoods which provide a range of housing options; a vibrant City Center: well designed andfunctioning commercial areas; and distinctive retail areas. LUPll Support the continuation of a strong residential community. 2. The proposed amendment beats a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare ORD# , PAGE 2 EXHIBIT D PAGE-LOF.. 5 because it will enable existing residential uses which became nonconforming upon incorporation to upgrade or otherwise enhance or renoyate the property and or structure in a manner similar to what is allowed if the subject property were located in a residential zone. The renoyation and/or modernization of existing structures makes these structures safer and more liyable, which has a direct relationships to the public health, safety, and welfate; and 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city because it affords those residents whose property became nonconforming as a result of incorporation to renoyate or make changes to their property in a manner similar to what is allowed of residents who's property is located in a residential zone. Section 3. Amendment. FWCC, Chapter 22 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit D-l. Section 4. Severability. The proyisions of this ordinance ate declared sepatate and seyerable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, patagraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the inyalidity of the application thereofto any person or circumstance, shall not affect the yalidity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the yalidity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effectiye date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effectiye Date. This ordinance shall be effectiye fiye (5) days after passage and publication as proyided by law. PASSED by the City Council ofthe City of Federal Way at a regulat meeting of the City Council on the - day of ,2002. ApPROVED: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ORD# ,PAGE 3 EXHIBIT D PAGE-2-0F: '5 ORD# ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERIC PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No.: ,PAGE 4 EXHIBIT Þ PAGE-LOF. 5 EXHIBIT D-I 22-338 Special proyisions for residential uses If the subject property contains a residential use that became nonconforming as to use or density as a result of the adoption of this chapter, the following regulations apply: (I) If the improyements on the subject property are damaged or destroyed by any sudden cause, the structure may be rebuilt; provided, that the number of dwelling units and the gross floor area in and on the subject property may not be increased ITom that which existed immediately prior to the damage or destruction and any other nonconformity of or on the subject property may not in any way be increased. The proyisions of this subsection are only ayailable if the applicant applies for a building permit within 12 months after the sudden damage or destruction and construction is commenced and completed under that building permit. (2) Other than as specified in subsection (I) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must be corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations or doing other work, other than normal maintenance, in any 12-month period to any structure on the subject property containim! multi-unit housinlZ (attached and/or stacked dwellinlZ units) and fair market value ofthese changes, alterations or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised yalue of that multi-unit structure. The applicant may proyide an appraisal of the improyement v;hieh has 13eefl àaffiageà. The appraisal must be from a source that is acceptable to the city. The community deyelopment director may require the applicant to proyide an appraisal from a source acceptable to the city if the assessed yaluation appears to be inappropriate. If an appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the city, the larger of the two amounts shall be used. ChanlZes. alterations additions or other work is subiect to all aDDlicable reQuirements of the Federal Way City Code includinlZ but not limited to oroyisions related to Enyironmentally Sensitiye Areas (FWCC Art. XIV) Off-street ParkinlZ (FWCC Art. XV)' Improyements (FWCC Art. XVI) and LandscaDinlZ (FWCC Art. XVII). (3) Other than as soecified in subsection (J) of this section the nonconforminlZ use or density must be corrected if the aDDlicant is makinlZ chanlZes alterations. addinlZ imDroyements or doinlZ other work other than normal maintenance in any 36-month Deriod. on the subiect oronerty containinlZ a sinlZie-family use and fair market value ofthese chanlZes alterations. additions or other work exceeds 75 nercent of the assessed or aporaised yalue of that sinlZle-family structure. ChanlZes alterations additions or other work must comnly with all bulk dimensional and other deyeloDment reQuirements for a sinlZle family detached dwellinlZ located in the RS 7.2 zone (FWCC 22-631), The annlicant may oroyide an aDoraisal of the imoroyement. The anDraisal must be from a source that is acceDtable to the city. The community deyelonment director may reQuire the annlicant to orovide an aDoraisal from a source acceptable to the city if the assessed valuation annears to be inaDoroDriate. If an anoraisal is Droyided by the aDDlicant or reQuired by the city the lamer of the two amounts shall be used. ChanlZes alterations additions or other work is subiect to all aDDlicable reQuirements of the Federal Way City Code includinlZ but not limited to orovisions related to Enyironmentally Sensitiye Areas (FWCC Art. XIV)' Off-street ParkinlZ (FWCC Art. XV)' Imoroyements (FWCC Art. XVI) and LandscaDinlZ (FWCC Art. XVrn. EXHIBIT --- .Þ PAGE-2 nr...s:- EXHIBIT E RESOLUTION NO. 02-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATED TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE TO ADDRESS NONCONFORMING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendment to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses, will not provide for improyed reyiew processes. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way fmds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses will not implement and is not consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official issued a Detennination of Non significance for the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses on August 11, 200 I; and WHEREAS, no comments or appeals were received prior to the established SEPA deadlines of August 27, 2001, and September 10,2001, respectiyely, and the initial Detennination of Nonsignificance became final without modification; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the code amendment relating to the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses on May 15, 2002, and forwarded a recommendation ofapproyal to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee ofthe Federal Way City Council considered the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses, on June 3, 2002, following which it did not recommend adoption of the proposed text amendment. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- EXHIBIT PAGE~ ~ OF- 4- conforming single family residential use located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses is not consistent with the intent and purpose ofFWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning) to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendment will not protect and will adyersely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the denial of the proposal: 1. The proposed FWCC text amendment is not consistent with, and does not substantially implement, the following Comprehensiye Plan goals and policies: LUP29 Provide for a mixture of commercial and residential uses in commercial areas, except Business Park and Office. LUG5 Develop a quality business park area that supports surrounding commercial areas. LUP36 Develop business parks which fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. 2. The proposed amendment does not bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because nonconforming residential uses are currently provided a special exception under the current Code to make alterations, renoyations or changes, within certain parameters. This expansion is limited to encourage the re-development of the area to a more intensive use as allowed by the Code, Any further expansion of these nonconforming residential uses increases the potential for conflict between a residential use (not currently allowed) and a more intensiye industrial, commercial or office use (which is allowed). Encouraging the further enhancement , Page 2 EXHiBIl F PAGE-LOE Res. # 4 and entrenchment of nonconfonning residential uses will preclude the siting and or expansion of business, commercial or office deyelopment, and will not further the public health, safety, and welfare; and 3. The proposed amendment is not in the best interest ofthe residents ofthe city because encouraging the further enhancement and entrenchment ofnonconfonning residential uses in areas designated for more intensive business, commercial or office developments will increase conflicts between the uses and preclude the location and or expansion of commercial developments. Business, commercial and office developments generate tax revenues for the City and proyide jobs to the City's residents. A City needs a mixture of residential and non- residential uses to function properly. Section 3. Seyerabilitv. ¡fany section, sentence, clause, or phrase ofthis resolution should be held to be inyalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such inyalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the yalidity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effectiye date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affinned. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effectiye immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS- DAY OF ,2002. ApPROVED: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE Res. # , Page 3 EXHIBII . F: PAGE3-0F: 4 ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO: Res. # EXHIBI ;, PAGE~ , Page 4 .JF. F 4. MEETING DATE: :Jub¡2¡ tOOl. ITEM# ~~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Amendment to the Federal Way City Code, Chapter 22, related to non conforming single family residential structures. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: J}! CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS ~ ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit AA - Staff Report to the Land Use and Transportation Committee, titled (City of Federal Way Planning Commission Recommendation to the Land Use & Transportation Committee), with: Exhibit B - Staff Report to the Planning Commission, w/out exhibits; and, Exhibit C - Ordinance amending Chapter 22 ofthe Federal Way City Code to address nonconforming single family residential structures, with Exhibit C-I. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Based on discussions with staff and inquiries from members of the public, staff prepared a Code amendment related to nonconforming residential structures for the Planning Commission's reyiew and recommendation as part of their work program. The proposed Code amendment would allow the expansion of a non- conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, so long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded and the expansion meets all other applicable development standards. The Land Use and Transportation Committee met on June 3, 2002, reyiewed the Planning Commission's recommendation regarding the proposed Code amendment related to nonconforming residential structures, and recommended adoption ofthe proposed Code amendment. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code to address nonconforming single family residential structures. PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye the proposed ordinance to second reading and enactment at the next regular meeting on July 2, 2002." ~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~¡: il~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading i;;~;o 2- Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE TO ADDRESS NONCONFORMING SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July, 1996, which significantly revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter 22 (Zoning). WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendment to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), to allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, so long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded, will proyide for improyed reyiew processes. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the code amenchnentto allow the expansion of a non- conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses will implement and is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official adopted the Determination ofNonsignificance issued on August 11,2001 for the code amenchnent to,allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, on or about March 26, 2002; and WHEREAS, no comments or appeals were receiyed prior to the established SEPA deadlines of August 27,2001, and September 10,2001, respectively, and the initial Determination ofNonsignificance became final without modification; and ORD# ,PAGE I -., -- , -- - - . . C) r-\/\i~:~'J'~-"'~ " Þ!/f / Ò 2- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the code amendment relating to the expansion of a non-confotming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses on May 15, 2002, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee ofthe Federal Way City Council considered the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, on June 3, 2002, following which it recommended adoption of the text amendment. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- confonning single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses is consistent with the intent and purpose ofFWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning) to proyide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare ofthe general public. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendment will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposal: 1. The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with, and substantially implements, the following Comprehensiye Plan goals and policies: ORD# ,PAGE 2 LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single family neighborhoods. HGI Preserve and protect the quality of existing residential neighborhoods and require new development to be of a scale and design that is compatible with existing neighborhood character. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because it facilitates the renoyation of existing nonconforming single family residential structures, so long as the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded or enlarged; and 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city because it affords owners of single family residential structures the flexibility to renoyate and modernize existing nonconforming structures in a manner which will not increase or expand the extent of the existing nonconformity. . Section 3. Amendment. FWCC, Chapter 22 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit C-I. Section 4. Severability. The proyisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the inyalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the yalidity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effectiye date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effectiye fiye (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. ORD# , PAGE 3 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of ,2002. ApPROVED: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, BOB STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No.: ORD# ,PAGE 4 Exhibit C-I 22-334 Nonconforming development. If any aspect, structure, improvement or deyelopment does not conform to the development regulations prescribed in this chapter, that aspect, structure, improvement or development must be brought into conformance or otherwise improyed as set forth below. (1) Change of use - Single-tenant site. If any applicant proposes a change of use on property used or occupied by a single tenant or use, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These provisions shall apply to the entire site. (2) Change of use - Multi-tenant site. If an applicant proposes a change of use on only a portion of property occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These proyisions shall apply only to that geographic portion of the site related to the use or tenant space on which the change is proposed. (3) Increase in gross floor area. If an applicant proposes to increase the gross floor area of any use on the subject property in anyone of the following ways, the applicant shall comply with the deyelopment regulations in effect at the time of the proposal, as specified below: a. If expansion of gross floor area of an existing building occurs either through addition of new floors within the structure or enlargement of the existing building footprint, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations in effect at the time the expansion is proposed. If the property on which the expansion is proposed is occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall comply with those deyelopment regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the expansion is proposed; or b. If a new and separate structure is being constructed on an already developed site, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the new structure and any related improvements are to be constructed~ c. If the increase in I!ross floor area inyolyes an existinl! sinl!le family residential dwelling. the aoolicant shall comply with the develooment rel!Ulations in effect at the time of the prooosal. For single family residences existinl! nonconformities may remain and continue so lonl! as the existinl! nonconformities are not beinl! increased or exoanded in any way. New construction or renovation which inyolves the increase in I!ross floor area of a nonconforminl! ORD# ,PAGE 5 sin!!:le family structure is subject to all aoolicable reQuirements of the Federal Way City Code inc1udin!!: but not limited to Droyisions related to Environmentallv Sensitive Areas (FWCC Art. XIV)' Off-street Parkin!!: (FWCC Art. XV). Improyements (FWCC Art- XVI) and LandscaDin!!: (FWCC Art. XVII). ORD# ,PAGE 6 EXHIBIT AA CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENOA TION June 3, 2002 To: fROM: Eric Faison, Chair land Userrransportation Committee (LUTe) Greg Fe.J:ú/Deputy Director of Community Deyelopment Services DaYid~, CP, Senior Planner, Madrona Planning & Development Services VIA: David Moseley, SUBJECf: Amendments Federa Way City Code (FWCC) relating to single family residential non-conforming structures (FWCC 22-334) and single family residential nonconforming residential uses (FWCC 22-338). I. BACKGROUND In 1998, Mr. Roger Hyppa submitted two letters to the City Council requesting a Code amendment that would allow the expansion of a residential use in a zone where residential uses are currently not allowed (attached as Exhibit A). As part of the Year 2001 Plannin9 Commission work program, Staff proYided analysis outlining arguments for and against allowing the expansion of a non-confonning residential use. Based on the Planning Commission's direction, staff prepared a Code amendment for the Planning Commission's review which would allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential use beyond what is currently allowed by the Code. Additionally, based on discussions with staff and inquiries from members of the public, staff also prepared a Code amendment related to nonconforming residential structures for the Planning Commission's review and recommendation. u. PROPOSAl The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and deliberated on May 15, 2002. There were tWo proposed Code amendments before the Planning Commission. One is related to nonconfonning single family residential structures, under FWCC 22-334. The second proposed Code amendment is related to nonconfonning single family residential uses, under FWeC 22-338. Staff recommended to the Planning Commission that the proposed Code amendment related to nonconforming structures be adopted. Staff recommended that the proposed Code amendment related to nonconfonning uses not be adopted. The staff report to the Planning Commission is included as Exhibit B. The proposal before the Planning Commission related to nonconforming single family residential structures would allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, so long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded. The proposed code amendment would clarify and expand existing Code proYisions contained in FWeC 22-334. The proposed Code amendment is outlined in Section III. A proposed Ordinance adopting the Code amendment is attached as ExhtbitC EXHIBIT Á~ The proposal before the Planning Commission related to nonconfft~ famiiy nADial 4- uses would allow the expansion of a non-conforming single famif1'ftY~~"'at i9 currently provided for under section 22-338. A nonconforming single family use is one which is located in a zoning district which does not allow single family residential uses. Under the proposed Code amendment, an existing nonconforming residential use could be increased by expanding and/or renoyating the existing structure and/or the addition of other improvements on the site. Any expansion, addition, or improvement would be required to meet the development standards such as lot coverage and required yards of the RS 7.2 single family zoning designation. The proposed code amendment would expand existing Code proYisions contained in FWCC 22- 338. The proposed Code amendment is outlined in Section III. A proposed Ordinance adopting the Code amendment is attached as Exhibit D. A Proposed Resolution to not adopt the Code amendment is attached as Exhibit Eo Changes to the existing Code language are shown as s6'ikeetlt (deletions) and double-underfim~ (proposed additions). III. PLANNING COMMISSION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION a. NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the proposed text amendment to FWCC 22- 334 (nonconforming structures) as presented by staff. Staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission was to adopt the provision related to non conforming residential structures. Changes to the existing Code language are shown as s6'ikeetlt (deletions) and double-underline (proposed additions): 22-334 Nonconforming development. If any aspect, structure, improvement or deyelopment does not conform to the development regulations prescribed in this chapter, that aspect, structure, improyement or deyelopment must be brought into conformance or otherwise improyed as set forth below. (1) Change of use - Single-tenant site. If any applicant proposes a change of use on property used or occupied by a single tenant or use, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These provisions shall apply to the entire site. (2) Change of use - Multi-tenant site. If an applicant proposes a change of use on only a portion of property occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These provisions shall apply only to that geographic portion of the site related to the use or tenant space on which the change is proposed. (3) Increase in gross floor area. If an applicant proposes to increase the gross floor area of any use on the subject property in anyone of the following ways, the applicant shall comply with the deyelopment regulations in effect at the time of the proposal, as specified below: a. If expansion of gross floor area of an existing building occurs either through addition of new floors within the structure or enlargement of the existing building footprint, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations in effect at the time the expansion is proposed. If the property on which the expansion is proposed is occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall comply with those development regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the expansion is proposed; or b. If a new and separate structure is being constructed on an already developed site, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations applica~~.t~ ~~ç¡~raphic portion of the site on which the new structure and any relaeJ\ntt!Jt1:f _are to be PAGE-LOF. Page 2 AA 4 constructed; or ~ If the increase in aross floor area involves an existina sinale family residential dwellina the aoolicant shall comoly with the develaoment reaulations in effect at the time of the prooosal For sinale family residences existina nonconformities may remain and continue so lana as the existina nonconformities are not beino increased or exoanded in any way New construction or renoyation which inyalyes the increase in aross floor area of a nonconfarmina sino Ie family structure is subject to all aoolicable reQuirements of the Federal Way Citv Code includina but not limited to orovisions related to Enyironmentallv Sensitive Areas lFWCC Art XIV) Off-street Parkina (FWCC Art XV) Imorovemenlcs (FWCC Art XVI) and landscaoina (FWCC Art XVII). b. NONCONFORMING USES The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the proposed text amendment to FWCC 22- 338 (nonconforming uses) as presented by staff. Note that staff did not recommend adoption of the provision related to non-conforming single-family uses. Changes to the existing Code language are shown as sffikeet!t (deletions) and double-underline (proposed additions): 22-338 Special provisions for residential uses If the subject property contains a residential use that became nonconforming as to use or density as a result of the adoption of this chapter, the following regulations apply: (1) If the improvements on the subject property are damaged or destroyed by any sudden cause, the structure may be rebuilt; proYided, that the number of dwelling units and the gross floor area in and on the subject property may not be increased from that which existed immediately prior to the damage or destruction and any other nonconformity of or on the subject property may not in any way be increased. The proyisions of this subsection are only ayailable if the applicant applies for a building permit within 12 months after the sudden damage or destruction and construction is commenced and completed under that building permit. (2) Other than as specified in subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must be corrected if the applicant is making changes, aiterations or doing other work, other than normal maintenance, in any 12-month period to any structure on the subject property ~ multi-unit housino (attached and/or stacked dwellina units) and fair market yalue of these changes, alterations or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised yalue of that multi-unit structure. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the improvement ....'hich has BeeR ~. The appraisal must be from a source that is acceptable to the city. The community deyelopment director may require the applicant to provide an appraisal from a source acceptable to the city if the assessed yaluation appears to be inappropriate. If an appraisal is proyided by the applicant or required by the city, the larger of the two amounts shall be used. ~ alterations. additions or other work is subject to all aoolicable reouirements of the Federal Way Otv Code includina but not limited to orovisions related to Enyironmentallv Sensitive Areas (FWCC Art XIV) Off-street Parkino (FWCC Art XV) Imorovements (FWCC Art XVI) and Landscanina (FWCC Art XVII) (3) Other than as soecified in subsection (1) of this section the nonconformino use or densitv must be corrected if the aoolicant is makina chanaes. alterations addina imorovements or doina other work other than normal maintenance in any 12-month oeriod on the subject orooertv containino a sinale-familv use and fair market value of these chanaes alterations additions or ~ork exceeds 75 oercent of the assess r r' " Chanaes alterations additions or other wor:Iuru.LslJ: m de.\lclQoment reauiremen~inole family det,,-d1e Pa~" 3 (FWCC 22-631). The aDDlicant may Drovide an aDDraisal of the imDroyement The aDDraisal must be from a source that is acceDtable to the citv, The communitY develoDment director may reouire the aDDlicant to orovide an aDDraisal from a source acceotable to the citY if the assessed valuation aDDears to be inaDDroDriate. If an aDDraisal is Drovided bv the aDDlicant or reQuired bv the citY the lamer of the two amounts shall be used Chances alterations additions or other work is subject to all aoolicable reauirements of the Federal Wav CitY Code inciudino hut not limited to oroyisions related to Environmentallv Sensitive Areas (FWCC Art XIV) Off-street Parkina (FWCC Art 'X:I/) ImDroyements (FWCC Art 'X:I/n and Landscaoina (FWCC Art 'X:I/rn IV. COUNCIL Acrr.ON/SrAFF RECOMMENOATION The Committee has the fallowing options: 1. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-334 (nonconforming single family residential structures) as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-338 (nonconforming single family residential uses) as recommended by the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve one or both of the proposed code amendments, 4. Recommend that the full Council disapproye one or both of the proposed code amendments. Staff recommends that the Committee adopt the Planning Commission recommendation and recommend to the full Council Option No.1; that the full Council adopt an ordinance approYing the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-334 (nonconforming single family residential structures); and Staff recommends that the Committee recommend to the full Council Option No.4; that the full Council not adopt an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to FWCC 22-338 (nonconforming single family residential uses) and adopt a resolution not adopting the proposed Code amendment. V. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMmEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows: =z As recommended by Planning Commission. As recommended by Planning Commission and amended by the LUTe. C;" at Exhib;" Exhibit A Exhi~IB "hibitC "'hibitD ExhimlE ,,"= fmm ROO"""'" d"'" M,y 19&Jo", 1,199B M" IS, 2002 S!òff R,port to Ih, PIa""io, Commi"ioo Pm""'" Oedi"o" ,dopli"" 'm,""m,"~ to fWCC 22-334 Pmpo"", O,d'"o" ,doptio, ,~dm,"~ to 'WCC 22-338 Pmpo"", R""'oti"" 001 'dopbo, 'm,"d"",,~ 10 ,wee 22-33 Page 4 EXHIBIT AA PAGE~OF.. 4- EXHIBIT B STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE (FWCC) AMENDMENTS: Expansion of Nonconforming Residential Uses and Expansion of Nonconforming Residential Structures Planning Commission Meeting of May 15, 2002 I. INTRODUCTION The Planning Commission met on June 20 and July 18, 200 I to discuss a Code amendment which would allow existing nonconforming single family residential uses to expand. However, while public testimony was taken, a public hearing on the proposed Code amendment was not held. Based on the Planning Commission's discussions, staff has reviewed the existing Code proyisions related to residential nonconformities and made several clarifying changes/additions to the preyious proposed Code amendment, Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-338. The text of the proposed Code amendment is attached as Exhibit A. Based on other nonproject-specific questions ITom members of the public and City Staff, proyisions related to nonconforming single family structures were also reyiewed. Staff has prepared an addition to FWCC 22-334 to provide a limited exemption to allow additions to existing nonconforming single family residential structures (also attached as Exhibit A). To aid in your reyiew, background information on the specific Code amendments is provided below, divided into sections related to nonconforming residential uses and nonconforming residential structures. Please keep in mind that nonconforming is a descriptiye term in the planning context and does not necessarily haye a negatiye connotation. It merely refers to a use or structure which was legally created, but due to a change in zoning, has become inconsistent with the current code provisions applicable to the property and/or zone in which the property is located. II. NONCONFORMING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES A. BACKGROUND Me. Hyppa's Request: In 1998, Mr. Hyppa submitted a letter to the City Council requesting a code amendment that would allow the expansion of a residential use in a zone where residential uses are currently not allowed. Specifically, Mr. Hyppa desires to add a stand-alone garage to an existing residence in a Business Park (BP) zone. Mr. Hyppa owns property located east of Pacific Highway South, between EXHIBn ~ PAGE-1-0E \ D South 336th and South 344th Streets, in a Business Park (BP) zone. Single-family or multi-family residential uses are not currently allowed in the BP zone. There are a number of single-family residences in this area that are a vestige of past development and King County's zoning. AdoPtion of Zoning Code: Upon incorporation of the City of Federal Way, the City adopted its own zoning regulations and designation for all properties within the City. During the months of January and February of 1990, prior to the adoption of the zoning code, the City held numerous public meetings to solicit public input on the proposed changes to the land use code and zoning map. The issue of nonconforming uses was specifically contemplated at that time, and a special provision for residential uses was enacted. The special proYision for residential uses has been reyiewed four times, since its adoption in 1990. Each time, a public hearing was held, in addition to review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Each time, the decision by the Council was to leaye the proyision in substantially the same form as it exists today. In 1991, maintenance work was exempted from the calculation of improyements that would trigger conformance, and in 1997, a 90-day abandonment provision and l80-day cessation of actiyity proyision was deleted from the section. Special Provisions for Residential Uses: FWCC, Section 22-338 provides as follows: If the subject property contains a residential use that became nonconforming as to use or density as a result of the adoption of this chapter, the following regulations apply: (1) If the improyements on the subject property are damaged or destroyed by any sudden cause, the structure may be rebuilt; proyided, that the number of dwelling units and the gross floor area in and on the subject property may not be increased from that which existed immediately prior to the damage or destruction, and any other nonconformity of or on the subject property may not in any way be increased. The provisions of this subsection are only available if the applicant applies for a building permit within 12 months after the sudden damage or destruction, and construction is commenced and completed under that building permit. (2) Other than as specified in Subsection (1) of this section, the nonconforming use or density must be corrected if the applicant is making changes, alterations or doing other work, other than normal maintenance, in any l2-month period to any structure on the subject property and fair market value of these changes, alterations or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that structure. The applicant may proyide an appraisal of the improyement that has been damaged. The appraisal must be from a source that is Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 Expansion of None on fa d seš!S!ruëñii'ës - PAGE~ 01= 13 tD acceptable to the City. The Community Development Director may require the applicant to proyide an appraisal from a source acceptable to the City, if the assessed yaluation appears to be inappropriate. If an appraisal is provided by the applicant or required by the City, the larger of the two amounts shall be used. B. ANALYSIS Staff is proyiding the following analysis outlining arguments for and against allowing additional exceptions to the Nonconformance chapter of the Zoning Code, to allow for additional expansion of nonconforming residential uses in non- residential zones- Staff has also incorporated seyeral additions to the proposed amendment to Sec 22- 338 related to nonconforming residential uses. While staff does not support the overall amendment to Sec 22-338, staff made the addition to 22-338(2) to distinguish between nonconforming single family and nonconforming multi-family uses and to ensure the designation of a multi - family use is consistent with the Code definition. The purpose of the proposed addition 22-338(2) is to make clear that any change in an existing nonconforming single family use is subject to all applicable requirements of the Code including proyisions related to Enyironmentally Sensitiye AIeas, parking, improyements, and landscaping. A nonconforming use is a use which lawfully existed prior to the enactment of a zoning ordinance, and which is maintained after the effectiye date of the ordinance, although it does not comply with the zoning restrictions applicable to the district in which it is situated. The right to continue a nonconforming use despite a zoning ordinance that prohibits such a use in the area is sometimes referred to as a "protected" or "yested" right. This right, however, refers only to the right not to have the use immediately terminated in the face of a zoning ordinance that prohibits the use. University Place v. McGuire, 102 Wn. App. 658, 9 P.3d 918 (2000), citing Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish County, 136 Wn.2d I, 6, 959 P.2d 1024 (1998). The preyailing public policy is to severely limit if not abolish nonconforming uses. Anderson v. Island County, 81 Wn.2d 312, 501 P.2d 594 (1972); Bartz v. Board of Adjustment, 80 Wn. 2d 209, 492 P.2d1374 (1972); Coleman v. Walla Walla, 44 Wn.2d 296, 266 P.2d 1034 (1954). Nonconforming uses are uniformly disfavored and the Washington courts haye repeatedly acknowledged the desirability of eliminating such uses. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish County, at 1028, citing Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 92 Wn.2d 905, 920, 602 P.2d 1177 (1979). The ultimate purpose of zoning ordinances is to confine certain classes of buildings and uses to certain localities. The continued existence of those that are nonconforming is inconsistent with that object. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Planning Commission Staff Report B to Page 3 Expansion of None on Iß e51 nlial ses/~tructures PAGE~OE Snohomish County, at 1027, citing State ex rei. Miller v. Cain, 40 Wn. 2d 216,221, 242 P.2d 505 (1952). The court in Anderson v. Island County held: ...it is contemplated that conditions should be reduced to conformity as completely and as speedily as possible with due regard to the special interest of those concerned and that where suppression is not feasible without working substantial injustice, there shall be accomplished the greatest possible amelioration of the offending use which justice permits... The generally accepted method of eliminating nonconforming uses is to prevent any increase in the nonconformity and, when changes in the premises are contemplated... to compel a lessening or complete suppression of the nonconformity. The theory of the zoning ordinance is that the nonconforming use is detrimental to public interests such as health, safety, or welfare. Commentators agree that nonconforming uses limit the effectiveness ofland-use-controls, imperil the success of community plans and injure property yalues. rd. at 1028, citing I R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning Sec. 6.02 and R. Settle, Washington Land Use Sec. 2.7 (d). Although found to be detrimental to important public interests, nonconforming uses are allowed to continue based on the belief that it would be unfair to require an immediate cessation of a nonconforming use. However, "[i]t was not and is not contemplated that preexisting nonconforming uses are to be perpetual." Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish County, at 1028, citing State ex. ReI. Miller v. Cain, at 505. Therefore, while status as a nonconforming use generally grants the right to continue the existing use, it does not grant the right to significantly change, alter, extend, or enlarge the existing use. Id. at 1027. In summary, Washington courts permit the "intensification" of nonconforming uses, but not the "enlargement" This requires that the character ofthe use remain unchanged, substantially the same facilities be used, and the use not differ in kind from the nonconforming use. Keller v. City of Bellingham, 92 Wn.2d 726, 600 P.2d 1276 (1979); Meridian Minerals v. King County, 61 Wn. App. 195,810 P.2d 31(1991). 1. Pros: It is generally accepted that a nonconforming use should be allowed to continue for some period after enactment of the ordinance making the use nonconforming to preyent a substantial injustice. Additionally, there may be situations in which it is appropriate to encourage the stability and expansion of nonconforming residential uses, such as in an area in transition. For example, in an area where industrial or heayy commercial uses are no longer yiable due to a lack of appropriate infrastructure, nonconforming residential uses may be allowed to enlarge or expand and new residences develop as a transition to a more mixed neighborhood with residential uses and lighter commercial and retail uses takes place. Such a PAGE~ \..,,::. B-- 1D Planning Commission Staff Report Page 4 Expansion ofNoncon~ esiStructures ....- scenario, however, would typically be accomplished by a zoning amendment to legalize the nonconforming residential uses and create incentives for lighter commercial, retail or mixed uses. 2. Cons: First, contrary to the aboye, Mr. Hyppa's nonconforming use is not being threatened with immediate termination. It has been nonconforming for oyer 10 years and, as long as the use is continued without enlargement, it may continue as a nonconforming use. Second, contrary to the aboye, where it was noted that allowing an expansion of nonconforming residential uses can sometimes proyide a transition to less intensiye uses, the exact opposite is the case here. In this type of case, where the residential use is a vestige of past zoning and deyelopment patterns, and the current zoning is directed to more intensive industrial uses, the general policy is to prohibit nonconforming uses from expanding so as to facilitate light industrial development. Third, the prevailing public policy is to seyerely limit, if not abolish, nonconforming uses. Nonconforming uses limit the effectiveness ofland- use-controls, imperil the success of community plans and injure property values. Fourth, the uses allowed in the BP zone are yehicle intensive and noisy, potentially operating 24-hours per day. Uses allowed in the BP zone include stone cutting, industrial laundry facilities, manufacturing, research and deyelopment facilities, hazardous waste storage and treatment, chemical manufacturing, warehouse, and wholesale distribution. These uses generate impacts that are generally incompatible with single-family residences. Allowing a single family use to extend it's life by expansion increases the possibility of conflicts. Fifth, the City has a finite supply of land available for more intensiye heavy commercial uses. Allowing nonconforming residential uses to enlarge or expand in these areas reduces the likelihood that the properties will become ayailable for redeyelopment by a more intensiye use as intended by the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Sixth, FWCC, Section 22-338 currently contains a special provision for residential uses. The existing code allows normal maintenance, alterations, or other work on the structure, so long as the fair market yalue of the proposed change does not exceed 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of the existing structure. Thus, Mr. Hyppa could make changes and/or add on to the existing structure, so long as the change or addition conforms to the deyelopment standards for the underlying zone, such as setbacks and Planning Commission Staff Report Page 5 Expansion ofNonconfo I e~mrC1Ures PAGE~- OF 8 10 height, and the change or addition does not exceed 50 percent of the assessed or appraised yalue of the structure. The existing code provisions would allow construction of an attached garage, but not allow a new detached garage to be constructed. c. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWCC Section 22-528 proyides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria provided by FWCC Section 22-528. The City may amend the text of the FWCC only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensiye plan; The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential uses is not consistent with the Comprehensiye Plan, because allowing the additional expansion of nonconforming residential uses beyond what is currently allowed by the Code is contrary to the following Comprehensiye Plan goals and policies: LUP29 Provide for a mixture of commercial and residential uses in commercial areas, except Business Park and Office. LUG5 Develop a quality business park area that supports surrounding commercial areas. LUP36 Develop business parks which fit into their surroundings by grouping similar industries in order to reduce or eliminate land use conflicts, allow sharing of public facilities and services, and improve traffic flow and safety. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare; and The proposed FWCC text amendments lack any substantial relationship, and negatiyely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. Nonconforming residential uses are currently proyided a special exception under the current Code to make alterations, renoyations or changes, within certain parameters. This expansion is limited to encourage the re-deyelopment of the area to a more intensiye use as allowed by the Code. Any further expansion of these structures increases the potential for conflict between a residential use (not currently allowed) and a more intensive industrial, commercial or office use (which is allowed). The City has designated the BP zone for intensiye commercial uses, which potentially generate noise, odors, light and traffic impacts, in an area with easy access to Interstate 5, the major transportation corridor. Encouraging the further enhancement and Planning Commission Staff Report Page 6 Expansion of None on form I troctures PAGEJ..-OF 1?- lD entrenchment of nonconforming residential uses in the BP zone will preclude the siting and or expansion of business, commercial or office development, and will not further the public health, safety, and welfare. 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest ofthe residents ofthe city. The proposed FWCC text amendments related to nonconforming residential uses are not in the best interest of the residents of the City, because encouraging the further enhancement and entrenchment of nonconforming residential uses in areas designated for more intensive business, commercial or office developments will increase conflicts between the uses and preclude the location and or expansion of commercial deyelopments. Business, commercial and office developments generate tax revenues for the City and provide jobs to the City's residents. A City needs a mixture of residential and non-residential uses to function properly. D. RECOMMENDA TION Based on the aboye, staff recommends not allowing additional expansion of nonconforming residential uses in non-residential zones beyond that already allowed under FWCC Section, 22-338. The uses currently allowed in the BP zone are not generally compatible with residential uses. As the remaining supply ofBP land develops, surrounding residences in the BP zone will be severely impacted. The nonconforming residential uses within the BP zone should be encouraged to relocate, in order to increase the supply of available BP-zoned land, and aid in the economic development of the City to benefit all its residents. Allowing the expansion of nonconforming residential uses would be contrary to this goal, and to preyailing public policy. III. NONCONFORMING SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES A. BACKGROUND & PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT It is important to distinguish between uses and structures. Non conforming structures are those structures located in a zone, containing an allowed use, where a portion of the structure may not comply with the current development regulations. For example, the front of the structure, when constructed, did comply with the front setback requirement. However, due to an expansion of the right-of-way, the front yard dimension has decreased or, due to the change in zoning from King County to the City of Federal Way, the front yard requirement has increased, the front of the structure is now within the required front yard setback and is thus nonconforming. Under the current Code, a property owner is precluded from expanding the gross floor area of a nonconforming single family structure unless the nonconformance is brought into conformity. FWCC Sec 22-334 requires that an improyement must comply with all development regulations in effect at the time the expansion is proposed (FWCC 22-334). Most jurisdictions allow additions to legal Planning Commission Staff Report Page 7 Expansion ofNonconform s tnlctures 1?- PAGE-L-O¡:-- to nonconforming single family structures, so long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded. Using the example above: a property owner who's house is nonconforming as to the front setback is precluded from adding on to the rear of the house unless the existing nonconformity is corrected, under the current provisions of the Code. The proposed addition to Sec. 22-334, applicable only to single family structures, would allow an expansion of the structure, so long as the portion of the structure which is nonconforming is in no way enlarged or expanded, and the proposed addition complies with all provisions of the Code. The following is the proposed Code language: "If the increase in gross floor area inyolyes an existing single family residential dwelling, the applicant shall comply with the development regulations in effect at the time of the proposal. For single family residences, existing nonconformities may remain and continue so long as the existing nonconformities are not being increased or expanded in any way. New construction or renovation which involves the increase in gross floor area of a nonconforming single family structure is subject to all applicable requirements of the Federal Way City Code including but not limited to provisions related to Enyironmentally Sensitiye AIeas (FWCC Art. XIV), Off-street Parking (FWCC Art. XV), Improvements (FWCC Art. XVI), and Landscaping (FWCC Art. XVII)." B. ANALYSIS Staff is proyiding the following analysis outlining arguments for and against allowing the expansion of a nonconforming single family residential structure in a single family residential zone. 1. Pros: It is generally accepted that a nonconforming single family residential structure be allowed to expand so long as the extent of the nonconformity is not expanded and so long as the expansion conforms to all applicable provision of the code such as building setbacks/yard requirements, height, and enyironmentaily sensitiye area regulations. Enabling a homeowner to expand or in other ways renovate their dwelling preserves and enhances the character of a neighborhood. As long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is not expanded and any proposed expansion complies with the applicable proyisions of the Code, negative impacts to the surrounding neighbors and the neighborhood oyer and aboye general deyelopment impacts are expected to be minimal or non existent. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 8 Expansion ofNonconfi esiStructures B to PAGE-LOF: 2. Cons: There are those situations where, for example, a single family dwelling is built so close to a property line that its presence intrudes on the neighboring property regardless of the expansion being constructed consistent with the Code. By allowing nonconforming structures to be renovated or expanded without bring the nonconformity into compliance with the Code, the nonconformance and any impacts associated with it are prolonged. The underlying policy regarding nonconformities is that they should be brought into compliance and not allowed to remain in perpetuity. Howeyer, the Code does provide that a non-conforming structure must be brought into conformance if "[t]he applicant is making any alteration or changes or doing any work, other than normal maintenance or other than tenant improyements, in anyone consecutiye l2-month period to an improvement that is nonconforming and the fair market yalue of the alteration, change or other work exceeds 50 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that improyement." (FWCC 22-334(6» Thus while a new kitchen or bedroom addition may not trigger the 50% threshold, a more complete renoyation of a single family dwelling would require that the nonconformance be brought into compliance with the Code. c. DECISIONAL CRITERIA FWCC Section 22-528 provides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria proyided by FWCC Section 22-528. The City may amend the text of the FWCC only if it finds that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential structures (FWCC 22-334) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, because allowing the expansion of nonconforming residential structures, so long as the nonconformity is not increased or expanded and the proposed addition is consistent with all aspects of the FWCC, is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single family neighborhoods. HGI Preserve and protect the quality of existing residential neighborhoods and require new development to be of a scale and design that is compatible with existing neighborhood character. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 9 Expansion ofNonconfo o/e~,.",_O B 10 PAGE-Î-OF.. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare; and The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential structures bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare because if facilitates the renoyation of existing nonconforming single family residential structures, so long as the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded or enlarged. The proposed addition must meet all aspects of the FWCC would be consistent with opportunities provided to all other properties. 3. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the City. The proposed FWCC text amendment related to nonconforming residential structures is in the best interest of the residents of the City, because it affords owners of single family residential structures the flexibility to renovate and modernize existing nonconforming structures in a manner which will not increase or expand the extent of the existing nonconformity. Well kept and modern single family houses and neighborhoods haye a positiye impact on the City's residents and the image of the City. D. RECOMMENDA TION Staff does recommend approyal of the proposed Code amendment related to nonconforming residential structures (FWCC 22-334), to afford property owners the maximum flexibility in the upkeep and renovation of their property, so long as the extent of any nonconformity is not increased or expanded in any way. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 10 Expansion of None a PAGE..liL-OF --~ I.D EXHIBIT C CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ORDINANCE NO. 02 - - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE TO ADDRESS NONCONFORMING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July, 1996, which significantly teyised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter 22 (Zoning). WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendment to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), to allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, so long as the extent of the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded, will provide for improyed review processes. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses will implement and is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official adopted the Determination of Non significance issued on August II, 2001 for the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-conforming single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, on Ot about March 26,2002; and WHEREAS, no comments Ot appeals were teceiyed priOt to the established SEPA deadlines of August 27,2001, and September 10, 2001, tespectively, and the initial Determination of Nonsignificance became final without modification; and EXHIBIT C PAGE-LOF: 5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the code amendment relating to the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses on May 15,2002, and forwarded a recommendation ofapproyal to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non-confonning single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses, on June 3, 2002, following which it recommended adoption of the text amendment. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendment to allow the expansion of a non- confonning single family residential structure located in a zoning district which allows single family residential uses is consistent with the intent and purpose ofFWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning) to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendment will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section I, the Fedetal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposal: 1. The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with, and substantially implements, the following Comptehensive Plan goals and policies: LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single family neighborhoods. ORD# ,PAGE 2 EXHIBI1__c PAGE-LOE )" HGI Preserve and protect lhe quality of existing residential neighborhoods and require new development to be of a scale and design that is compatible with existing neighborhood character. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial telationship to public health, safety, Ot welfare because it facilitates the renoyation of existing nonconforming single family residential structures, so long as the existing nonconformity is in no way expanded or enlarged; and 3. The proposed amendment is in the best intetest of the residents of the city because it affords owners of single family residential structutes the flexibility to renoyate and modernize existing nonconforming sttuctutes in a manner which will not increase or expand the extent of the existing nonconformity. Section 3. Amendment. FWCC, Chapter 22 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit C-l. Section 4. SeverabilitY. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and seyetable. The inyalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdiyision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the yalidity of the temainder of the otdinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effectiye Date. This ordinance shall be effectiye five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City ofFederai Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of ,2002. ApPROVED: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ORD# ,PAGE 3 EXHIBIT C PAGE-z-OF.. 5 ORD# A TrEST: CITY CLERK, N. CRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY A TrORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: ,PAGE4 EXHIBll- PAGE__~ ')~ c 5 EXHIBIT C-l 22-334 Nonconforming deyelopment. If any aspect, structure, improvement or development does not conform to the deyelopment regulations prescribed in this chapter, that aspect, structure, improyement or development must be brought into conformance or otherwise improyed as set forth below. (1) Change of use - Single-tenant site. If any applicant proposes a change of use on property used or occupied by a single tenant or use, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These provisions shall apply to the entire site. (2) Change of use - Multi-tenant site. If an applicant proposes a change of use on only a portion of property occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall meet those provisions determined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the change of use. These proyisions shall apply only to that geographic portion of the site related to the use or tenant space on which the change is proposed. (3) Increase in gross floor area. If an applicant proposes to increase the gross floor area of any use on the subject property in anyone of the following ways, the applicant shall comply with the development regulations in effect at the time of the proposal, as specified below: a. If expansion of gross floor area of an existing building occurs either through addition of new floors within the structure or enlargement of the existing building footprint, the applicant shall comply with all development regulations in effect at the time the expansion is proposed. If the property on which the expansion is proposed is occupied by multiple tenants or uses, the applicant shall comply with those deyelopment regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the expansion is proposed; or b. If a new and separate structure is being constructed on an already developed site, the applicant shall comply with all deyelopment regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the new structure and any related improvements are to be constructed~ c. If the increase in !!fOSS floor area inyolves an existin!! sin!!le family residential dwellin!! the aDDlicant shall comDlv with the develoDment re!!ulations in effect at the time of the proDosal. For sin!!le family residences existin!! nonconformities may remain and continue so Ion!! as the existin!! nonconformities are not bein!! increased or exDanded in any wav New construction or renovation which involves the increase in !!ross floor area of a nonconformin!! sin!!le familv structure is subject to all aDolicable reQuirements of the Federal Way CitY Code includin!! but not limited to provisions related to Environmentally Sensitiye AIeas (FWCC Art. XIV) Off-street Parkin!! (FWCC Art. XV)' ImDroyements (FWCC Art. XVI). and LandscaDin!! (FWCC Art XVII). EXHIBIT C PAGE-LOF.. :; 1" = 100' . R/W TO DE VACAlEO ::E:~~.'!~~::::='!=~ ~~=.~,_.~-~.,"'" PI.RŒL" ""0<-0016. ""'<-0010 .""'. .""'. .,...~,.....,"-'-" TRESOEN'PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT LAYOUT A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC. 4, TWP. 2tN., RGE 4 E.. W.M. KING COUNTY, WA EXHIBIT Ill} /¡ -~-::=-- - , .<:;;'0 UNO ENGINEERING, Ine. -. -- '~. ...... - ;::: !~I :~::;:; '-.-M~' .~~- ITEM# ~ ' MEETING DATE: Jelly 2t Uioz. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: South 298th Street Vacation Ordinance CATEGORY: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS BUDGET IMPACT: X ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ A TT ACHMENTS: draft Ordinance vacating a portion of S. 298" Street; June 3, 2002 Memorandum from Marwan Salloum to Eric Faison SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: As part of the plat of Tresden Place, the City required the applicant to align the intersection ofS. 298" Street where it crosses Military Road. The alignment resulted in relocation of a portion of the street some distance to the north, leaving a former dead-end portion of the street unused. The applicant proposed as part of the plat to vacate the "old" part of S. 298" street, in exchange for its dedication of property for the "new," aligned portion. A public hearing for the South 298th Street Vacation was held at the December 19, 2000, City Council meeting, and the City Council approved the Resolution #00-333 directing the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance vacating South 298th Street in the vicirrity of the intersection of South 298th and Military Road upon the satisfaction of a number of conditions, detailed in the attached June 3 Memorandum from Marwan Sallom to the LUTC chair. The LUTC concluded that all of the conditions have been met and recommended that the Council adopt an ordinance vacating the "old" portion of S. 298" Street, concurrent with Council approval of the final plat of Tresden Place. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On June 3, 2002, the Land Use & Transportation Committee recommended that the vacation ordinance be forwarded to the full City Council for first reading PROPOSED MOTION: "I move the proposed ordinance to second reading and approval at the next regular meeting on July 2, 2002" (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION ~ MOVED TO SECOND REAIJl~~.rrdinancesonlY) . afh:JUI'I ~I WOZ ~ar fI1~ COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # 3ó() Iq/Ir/ () ¿ DATE: TO: June 3, 2002 Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee MaIwan Salloum, Street System Manager (Jrn<- ~ South 298'" Street Vacation ~ FROM: RE: SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Public Hearing for the Portion of South 298'" Street Vacation was held at the December 19, 2000 City Council Meeting. No public comments were received, and the City Council approved Resolution #00-333 directing the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance vacating a portion of South 298'" Street upon the satisfaction of the following: A. All existing utilities within the right of way area to be vacated haye been relocated into the new right of way or a utility easement has been granted to the City over existing utilities. B. The new street alignment of S. 29S'" Street inyolving the substitute right of way has been constructed and the City has accepted the construction. C. The City has verified the substitute right of way is of equal or greater value than the vacated right of way. If the substituted right of way is of less yalue than the yacated portion, the Petitioners shall have paid the difference to the City. All utilities in the area to be vacated haye been relocated into thé new right of way. The new street has been constructed and found acceptable by the Public Works Department. The owner ofthe abutting property to the north (Pageantry Communities of Washington) will be dedicating, as substitute right of way, an area of 13,500 fully developed Right of Way. The portion of South 29S'" Street to be vacated has a total areaofS,S40 square feet The owners of the abutting properties have satisfied the conditions outlined in Resolution #00-333 and the substitute right of way will be dedicated as part of the final plat to be approved subsequent to this vacation. An ordinance vacating the property is attached to this memo for approval, and staff will be present at the Land Use and Transportation Committee meeting to answer questions and provide additional infonnation as needed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding the attached ordinance to the June IS. 2002 Council meeting for first reading. MS:dl Enclosure cc: Project File Day File ORDINANCE NO. 02- DRAFT foff( 10 L- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF SOUTH 298th STREET IN THE VICINITY OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH 298th STREET AND MILITARY ROAD. WHEREAS, a valid petition has been filed by the owners of at least two-thirds of the abutting property requesting yacation of a portion of South 298th Street, in the vicinity of the intersection of South 298th Street and Military Road; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 00-333, the Federal Way City Council held a public hearing at its regular meeting on December 19, 2000, to consider the petition for vacation as required by state law and Federal Way City Code Section 13-102; and WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public hearing on December 19, 2000, the City Council considered the proposed vacation and its compliance with the vacation criteria outlined in FWCC Section 13-102, and decided to grant the vacation pending satisfaction of the conditions outlined in Resolution 00-333; and WHEREAS, Pageantry Communities of Washington, the project developer, is dedicating a substitute right of way, of equal or greater value as part of final plat approval under file number 02-1011 04-00-SU, that will better serve the public interest by allowing for a realignment of South 298th Street to a perpendicular intersection with better site distance and reduced turning movements at the intersection of Military Road and South 298th Street; and ORD# ,PAGEl WHEREAS, the owners of abutting property haye satisfied the conditions outlined in Resolution 01-333; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Vacation. That portion of the right-of-way of South 298th Street, in the vicinity of the intersection of South 298th Street and Military Road, as described in Exhibit "An (legal description) and as depicted on Exhibit "A" (vicinity map) attached hereto is hereby vacated. The property lying in the portion of the right-of-way described in Exhibit "An shall be returned to and belong to those persons entitled to receive the property in accordance with state law. Section 2. Recordation- Upon passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, the City Clerk is directed to cause this ordinance to be recorded with the King County Department of Records and Elections. Section 3- Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The inyalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereofto any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days fTom and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. ORD# ,PAGE 2 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this _day of 2002. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK. FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. K:\ordinls.298-military vacation ORD# ,PAGE 3 TRESOEt{PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT LAYOUT A PORTION OF THE HE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC. 4, TWP. 21N., RGE 4 E, W.M. KING COUNTY, WA EXHIBIT I( Ií ='==.-- -. I" = 100' . Rfw TO BC VACAI[O .s:..OUND ~'NGfNEERnýG, Inc. -_.~~ -'-~.""- ::::!~¡:;:~.; '--. ~ M~' .-------- =~~~~~,!=~ ;o:."",:,:,=.",,-~~-.......,. PIJ<CB. . <><""HO18, ...........,. """', ,""". MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Status Report Pacific Highway S HOV Lanes Phase II Improyements Project (S 324th to S 340th Street) 85% Design CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Land Use/Transportation Committee dated Inne 17,2002. '--'---'--'-'---'-----_._.m___.__---.-.---.-.----.---.-..--.-------------.-.----.------------------.-----.----------.--.------ -----"'-----'-----'-----'------'--'-----" SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II (South 324th to South 34Oth Street) Widening Improvement Project includes adding HOV lanes north and southbonnd, adding curb, gutter, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, planted medians, restricting left turn movements to intersections, and consolidating driveways where possible. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow, reduce accidents by eliminating turning conflicts, to promote transit and carpool use and improve aesthetics of the corridor. An average of more than 40,000 vehicles per day use this section of Pacific Highway South, therefore operating over capacity. From 1997 through 1999, there were 246 accidents in this section with 82 accidents having one or more injuries. No fatalities occurred during this period. In an effort to reduce costs and public disruption, the following planned projects will be incorporated into the design and will be constructed as part of this project: . Lakehaven Utility District Water and Sewer Utility Adjustment . Utility Underground Conversion within project limits. PROJECT FUNDING: The project is funded as follows: PROJECT EXPENDITURES Planning and Design Right of Way Acquisition $1,095,000 3,214,000 6,700,000 670,000 Year 2003 Construction 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management Undergronnd Conversion (PSE) 770,000 600,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $13,049,000 July 2, 2002 Agenda Bill - k:'councillagdbills\2002\pac hwy so hov phase ii, 85% design status report.doc Page #2 FUNDING AVAILABLE Total Grant Funding $10,166,562 (TIA $6,210,400, TPP 1,725,000, STPUL $1,022,174, and, WSDOT $1,208,988) Mitigation Fund Interest Earning 977,992 50,597 Budgeted City Matching Fund Transfer in Street CIP Fund Lakehaven Utility District 835,000 500,000 22,371 (Engineering service for utility replacement/Adjustment) TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $12,552,522 PROJECT BUDGET SHORTFALL $496,478 At this time this project budget has funding shortfall of $496,478. Staff is not requesting a budget adjustment for this project at this time. Staff recently submitted a grant application to PSRC for additional funds for this project. As we proceed with the project Final design, right of way acquisitions process and additional grant requests, the total project costs and funding will be refmed and presented to committee and Council at the 100% design completion status report for further action. OVERHEAD UTILITIES CONVERSION All overhead utilities along Pacific Highway between South 3121h Street and South 3241h Street will be converted into an underground system except the Puget Sound Energy (PSE) electrical transmission system (I 15,000 volts or larger). COMMERCIAL OVERHEAD UTILITIES SERVICE Approximately fifteen commercial overhead electrical services within the project limits will need to be addressed by either converting to an underground system, or by allowing the service to remain overhead. PSE will provide a connection point at the property line to each commercial business. Staff is in the process of investigating all available options for reconnecting the existing services to the underground system, including cost and responsibility, and will report to the committee at the 100% design report. PROPOSED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT In an effort to reduce costs, eliminate utility conflicts, and reduce public disruption caused by the project, staff is recommending that the City enter into an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Lakehaven Utility District. The expenditures shown on the previous page under LUD ILA are for engineering services only. Please fmd a copy of the proposed ILA for the referenced sewer and water main adjustment/construction attached for your consideration. Staff seeks Councils authorization to enter into this agreement with Lakehaven Utility District. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends placing the following items on the June 4, 2002 Council Consent Agenda: I. Authorize staff to froceed with the final design of the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II (South 3241h to South 340 Street) Widening Improvement Project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorizations. 2. Authorization to enter into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II Project. July 2, 2002 Agenda Bill . k:lcouncillagdbills\2002\pac hwy so hoy phase ii, 85% design status report.doc Page #3 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 17,2002 meeting the Land UsefTransportation Committee made the following recommendations: I. Authorize staff to froceed with the final design of the Pacific Highway South Hay Lanes Phase II (South 324" to South 340 Street) Widening Improvement Project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorizations. 2. Authorization to enter into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for the Pacific Highway South Hay Lanes Phase II Project. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval to proceed with the fmal design for the Pacific Highway S Hay Lanes Phase II (South 324" to South 340" Street) Improvement Project and authorize staff to enter into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for the Pacific Highway South Hay Lanes Phase II Project. .............-..............-............... CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ... ~_._-_............_..... ".... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 0 0 0 APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # MS:"" k:\ooundl'agdbin'\2002'pac bwy '° bov pb", ii, 85% design status repo"-d", DATE: June 17,2002 TO: Eric Faison, Chair ~ Land Use / Transportation Committee Marwan Salloum, Street Systems Manage David H. Moseley, City Manage~~ Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II (S 324'0 to S 340'0 Street) Improvement Project - 85% Design Status Report FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: The Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II (South 324" to South 340" Street) Widening Improvement Project includes adding HOV lanes north and southbound, adding curb, gutter, sidewalk, lighting, landscaping, planted medians, restricting left turn movements to intersections, and consolidating driveways where possible. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow, reduce accidents by eliminating turning conflicts, to promote transit and carpool use and improve aesthetics of the corridor. An average of more than 40,000 vehicles per daynse this section of Pacific Highway South, therefore operating over capacity. From 1997 through 1999, there were 246 accidents in this section with 82 accidents having one or more injuries. No fatalities occuned during this period. In an effort to reduce costs and public disruption, the following planned projects will be incorporated into the design and will be constructed as part of this project: Lakehaven Utility District Water and Sewer Utility Adjustment Utility Underground Conversion within project limits. The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Cunently, the project design is approximately 85% complete, and includes the following completed tasks: SEP A Determination and Project Permitting Value Engineering study held July 30, 2001 NEP A Environmental Classification Right of way appraisals and review appraisals Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for Water and Sewer line relocation/replacement design and construction Project Design to 85% Open House held on March 7, 2001 and March 6,2002 Ongoing tasks include: Right of way requirements (negotiation, acquisition, and certification) Complete design to 100% Utility Underground Conversion Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for project limits June 17,2002 LUTC Memo - Pacific Hwy. S. HOY Lanes Phase II, 85% Page 2 PROJECT BUDGET The project is funded as follows: PROJECT EXPENDITURES Planning and Design Right of Way Acquisition $1,095,000 3,214,000 6,700,000 670,000 Year 2003 Construction 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management 770,000 600,000 Underground Conversion (PSE) TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $13,049,000 FUNDING AVAILABLE Total Grant Funding $10,166,562 (TIA$6,210,400, TPP 1,725,000, STPUL $1,022,174, and, WSDOT $1,208,988) Mitigation Fund Interest Earning 977,992 50,597 835,000 500,000 22,371 (Engineering service for utility replacement/Adjustment) Budgeted City Matching Fund Transfer in Street CIP Fund Lakehaven Utility District TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $12,552,522 PROJECT BUDGET SHORTFALL $496,478 At this time this project budget has funding shortfall of $496,478. Staff is not requesting a budget adjustment for this project at this time. Staff recently submitted a grant application to PSRC for additional funds for this project. As we proceed with the project Final design, right of way acquisitions process and additional grant requests, the total project costs and funding will be rermed and presented to committee and Council at the 100% design completion status report for further action. OVERHEAD UTILITIES CONVERSION All overhead utilities along Pacific Highway between South 312~ Street and South324~ Street will be converted into an underground system except the Puget Sound Energy (PSE) electrical transmission system (115,000 volts or larger). COMMERCIAL OVERHEAD UTILITIES SERVICE Approximately fifteen commercial overhead electrical services within the project limits will need to be addressed by either converting to an underground system, or by allowing the service to remain overhead. PSE will provide a cormection point at the property line to each commercial business. Staff is in the process of investigating all available options for recormecting the existing services to the underground system, including cost and responsibility, and will June 17,2002 LUTC Memo - Pacific Hwy. S. HOV Lanes Phase II, 85% Page 3 report to the committee at the 100% design report. PROPOSED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT In an effort to reduce costs, eliminate utility conflicts, and reduce public disruption caused by the project, staff is recommending that the City enter into an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Lakehaven Utility District. The expenditures shown on the previous page under LUD ILA are for engineering services only. Please fmd a copy of the proposed ILA for the referenced sewer and water main adjustment/construction attached for your consideration. Staff seeks Councils authorization to enter into t1ús agreement with Lakehaven Utility District. RECOMMENDA nONS: Staff recommends placing the following items on the June 4, 2002 Council Consent Agenda: 1. Authorize staff to proceed with the fmal design of the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II (Sonth 324'" to South 340'" Street) Widening Improvement Project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 100% design completion stage for further reports and authorizations. 2. Authorization to enter into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase II Project. MS:dl Project File Day File k"utc12002lpacifi, highway plwon. 85%.doc MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# ~QJ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: S 3641h Street Culyert Replacement Project - 100% Design Approyal and Authorization to Bid CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ¡g¡ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS; Memo to Land Useffransportation Committee dated June 17,2002. SUMMARvïßACKGRO UND:-----------------------_u_----------------------------------------------------- This project is located at the stream crossing of the North Fork of West Hylebos Creek at South 364th Street in the City of Federal Way- A 42" undersized culvert serves as a partial fish barrier and contributes to high instream flow velocities, particularly during storm events, which have scoured the downstream substrate damaging valuable salmon spawning habitat. The culvert is specifically identified as a fish passage barrier in the Washington Conservation Commission's Salmon Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Pullyallup/White River Basin and Pierce County Conservation District's Fish Passage Inventory Project Report. The project consists of replacing the undersized 42" concrete culvert with a 12-foot span corrugated metal pipe arch. The culvert replacement will reduce stream flow velocity and eliminate the scouring effect to the downstream substrate- The reduction in instream flow velocity combined with the augmentation and repair of the channel substrate will provide additional salmon spawning habitat and promote fish passage to valuable upstream wetland rearing and feeding areas- SWM staff has completed the 100% project design and specifications and will be providing construction administration- Initially the project was planned to be constructed in 2000- A Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) pennit fi-om State Department Fish And Wildlife was issued in June 2000- The project has been postponed due a lack of necessary easements, and the HPA pennit has since expired. Staff anticipates obtaining all easements and extending the HP A pennit in order to construct the project this summer- The HPA pennit will require construction in the summer season (August and perhaps early September), therefore the project should be bid now in order to bnild it this year- Staff is requesting authorization to bid the project contingent upon receiving easements and pennit extension. PROJECT FUNDING: The project is funded as follows; PROJECT EXPENDITURES: Design 2002 Engineers Construction Estimate 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management TOTAL PROJECT COSTS In-house $43,210 $4,321 in-house $47,531 July 2, 2002 Council Agenda - S 364" Street Culver Replacement Page #2 FUNDING AVAILABLE The project will be funded by a $30,000 National Ocearuc and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Grant, and the SWM small works CIP budget. Staff anticipates bidding the project in July 2002 and awarding in August 2002. Construction will commence in August 2002 with an estimated substantial completion date of September 2002. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 17,2002 meeting the Land Userrransportation Committee made the following recommendations: I. Approve 100% design for the South 364" Street Culvert Replacement Project; 2. Authorize staff to bid the South 364" Street Culvert Replacement Project contingent upon receiving necessary easements and HPA permit extension and return to the City Council for authority to award the project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye approyal of the 100% design plans for the South 364" culvert Replacement Project, to authorize staff to bid the project contingent upon receiving necessary easements and HP A pennit extension and return to the City Council for pennission to award the project to the lowest responsiye, responsible bidder." ~I';~~::~~~-:;;~~~:~--- -----_.~.__._._..._._.__..._.._..__._.._.__..__..... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 0 0 0 APPROVED DENIED TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Ucouncil\agdbills\2002\s 364th street culvert replacement, 100% des & auth to bid.doc DATE: June 17, 2002 TO: South 364th Street Culyert Replacement Project Paul A. Bucich, SWM Manager ~ David H. Moseley, City Manag~ S 364'h Street Culvert Replacement Project - 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND This project is located at the stream crossing of the North Fork of West Hylebos Creek at South 364th Street in the City of Federal Way. A 42" undersized culvert serves as a partial fish barrier and contributes to high instream flow yelocities, particularly during stonn eyents, which haye scoured the downstream substrate damaging valuable salmon spawning habitat. The culyert is specifically identified as a fish passage barrier in the Washington Conservation Commission's Salmon Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the PullyalluplWhite Riyer Basin and Pierce County Conservation District's Fish Passage Inyentory Project Report. The project consists of replacing the undersized 42" concrete culvert with a l2-foot span corrugated metal pipe arch. The culyert replacement will reduce stream flow yelocity and eliminate the scouring effect to the downstream substrate. The reduction in instream flow velocity combined with the augmentation and repair of the channel substrate will provide additional salmon spawning habitat and promote fish passage to valuable upstream wetland rearing and feeding areas. SWM staff has completed the 100% project design and specifications and will be providing construction administration. Initially the project was planned to be constructed in 2000. A Hydraulic Project Approval (lIP A) pennit ¡¡-om State Department Fish And Wildlife was issued in June 2000. The project has been postponed due a lack of necessary easements, and the HP A pennit has since expired. Staff anticipates obtaining all easements and extending the HP A pennit in order to construct the project this summer. The HP A pennit will require construction in the summer season (August and perhaps early September), therefore the project should be bid now in order to build it this year. Staff is requesting authorization to bid the project contingent upon receiving easements and pennit extension. PROJECT FUNDING: The project is funded as follows: PROJECT EXPENDITURES Design 2002 Engineers Construction Estimate 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management TOTAL PROJECT COSTS In-house $43,210 $4,321 in-house $47,531 06/12/2002 LUTC memo - S. 364" Culvert Replacement Page 2 FUNDING AVAILABLE The project will be funded by a $30,000 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Grant, and the SWM small works CIP budget. Staff anticipates bidding the project in July 2002 and awarding in August 2002. Construction will commence in August 2002 with an estimated substantial completion date of September 2002. Recommendation: Staff requests that the Committee place the following project recommendations on the July 2, 2002 City Council Consent Agenda: 1. Approve 100% design for the South 364" Street Culvert Replacement Project; 2. Authorize staff to bid the South 364" Street Culyert Replacement Project contingent upon receiving necessary easements and HPA pennit extension and return to the City Council for authority to award the project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. PB,d! Project File DayFiI, K,ILUTC\2002'S 364,. Cwv'" Roplacemont lOO"/o.doc ../ MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# ~(; ') CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Draft 1-5/SR-18/SR-161 Triangle Study ---.-.-.-----.-.---.----.-.-.-..--.--.-.----.----.- CATEGORY: -. '-------'-'---'-----'-'-'-" .-..-.---.----------..---.-.--.--. BUDGET IMPACT: [g CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee dated June 17, 2002. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is managing a study to detennine short and long-tenn solutions to congestion and safety issues in the vicinity of the 1-5/ SR-18/ SR-161 interchange. WSDOT budgeted $300,000 towards this study and requested financial and staff participation from adjacent and affected agencies. City Council approved $50,000 towards this study on December 5, 2000. King County contributed $20,000 and the City of Milton contributed $5,000. STATUS Project Advisory Committee participants include staff from WSDOT, Federal Way, Milton, King County and Federal Highway Administration. Since the last update in April, the consultant has further deyeloped the traffic analysis, and met with stakeholders including Weyerhaeuser, Enchanted Parks, Federal Way Chamber of Commerce, Fife AIea Chamber of Commerce, Lloyd Enterprises, Friends of the Hylebos, Olympic Pipeline, and Rhododendron Species Foundation and Botanical Garden. In each meeting, we described the project and asked for their feedback on preference for Concepts A and B, and the S 376th Interchange option. Most stakeholders preferred Concept A to Concept B. The exceptions were Weyerhaeuser and the Rhododendron Species Foundation, primarily because of lesser impacts to their locations. Many also preferred the addition of the S 376th Street interchange to reduce out of direction trayel for destinations south of S 356th Street. REMAINING TASKS Following review of the comments of the Draft Report, the consultant will prepare a Final Report with a preferred alternative, and identifYing areas of future study. In addition, WSDOT has detennined that they can help fund additional effort to proyide more-detailed cost infonnation for the Regional Transportation improvement District proposal. WSDOT is requesting City participation of$15,000 for this added effort. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the June 17, 2002 Land UsefTransportation Committee meeting, the Committee recommended that the Council adopt the following positions on the Triangle Study; 1. Concept A would be preferred oyer Concept B. Howeyer, ramp alignments in the northeast quadrant of the 1-5 / SR 18 interchange should be reexamined to minimize right-of-way impacts. The westbound left-turn moyement at the intersection ofSR 18 and SR 161 should be maintained. 2. Staff also recommends that the Committee recommend approyal of an amendment to the project agreement with WSDOT to increase the city's contribution to the project for $15,000 for further analysis of staging and costs. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to adopt the following positions on the Triangle Study: I. Support Concept A; however, ramp alignments in the northeast quadrant of the 1-5/SR-18 interchange should be reexamined to minimuze right-of-way impacts. 2. Maintain the left-turn moyement at the intersection ofSR-18 and SR-161. and I move to accept the amendment to the project agreement with WSDOT to increase the City's contribution for the project by $15,000 for further analysis of staging and costs." .. -- - .---- .-- -_._._----_._._.__.._-_..._----~----- -- .----.-.-.-.-.-.---------.---...----.---.-----.-..---.-----.--------.-.----.-------.- --.-.-.-.--.-----.-.----..--.------.--..- CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REY¡SED - 0511012001 Draft Triangle Study.doc DATE: TO: June 17,2002 FROM: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use I Transportation Committee Rick Perez, Traffic Engineer fl!f' David H. Moseley, City Manage~r SR-18 I SR-161 I 1-5 Triangle Study Draft Report VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is managing a study to detennine short and long-term solutions to congestion and safety issues in the vicinity of the I-51 SR-181 SR-16l interchange- WSDOT budgeted $300,000 towards this study and requested fmancial and staff participation ITom adjacent and affected agencies. City Council approyed $50,000 towards this study on December 5, 2000. King County contributed $20,000 and the City of Milton contributed $5,000. STATUS Project Advisory Committee participants include staff ITom WSDOT, The City of Federal Way, The City of Milton, King County and Federal Highway Administration. Since the last update in April, the consultant has further deyeloped the traffic analysis, and has met with stakeholders, including: Weyerhaeuser, Enchanted Parks, Federal Way Chamber of Commerce, Fife Area Chamber of Commerce, Lloyd Enterprises, Friends of the Hylebos, Olympic Pipeline, and Rhododendron Species Foundation and Botanical Garden. In each meeting, staff described the project and asked for their feedback on preference for Concepts A and B, and the S 376th Interchange option. Most stakeholders preferred Concept A to Concept B. The exceptions were Weyerhaeuser and the Rhododendron Species Foundation, primarily because of lesser impacts to their locations- Many stakeholders preferred the addition of the S 376th Street interchange to reduce out of direction trayel for destinations south ofS 356th Street. REMAINING TASKS Following review of the comments of the Draft Report, the consultant will prepare a Final Report with a preferred altematiye, identifYing areas of future study. In addition, WSDOT has detennined that they can help fund additional efforts to provide more-detailed cost information for the Regional Transportation improvement District proposal. WSDOT is requesting City participation of$15,000 for this added effort. CONCLUSION Staff has reyiewed the Draft Report and has reached the following conclusions, analyzed ITom the perspective of what the City would need to revise in its Capital Improvement Plan. However, forecast traffic volumes were not available for each feature of Concept A and Concept B, hence these conclusions may be revised based on the final numbers. 5. 6. Concept A with the addition of the S 376'" Street interchange and the preservation of the westbound left- turn at SR-18 / SR-16l intersection would: a. Reduce costs at the SR-18 /SR-161 intersection by $2.7 million, due to the eliminated need fora westbound triple-left-turn lane and widening SR-161 SB to accommodate it; Reduce costs at the SR-99 / S 356'" Street intersection by $2.6 million due to a reduced need to widen S 356'" Street between SR-99 and SR-161 to 5 lanes, but would then need a second eastbound left-tum lane; Increase costs by $0.3 million at the SR-161 / S 356'" Street intersection to add a southbound right-turn lane; Increase costs by $0.3 million to add a westbound right-turn lane at SR-16l / Milton Road S. 1. 2. 3. 4. b. c. d. Concept A with the prohibition of the westbound left-turn at the SR 18 / SR 161 intersection would: a. Reduce costs at the SR-18 / SR-16l intersection by $3.0 million, due to the eliminated need fora westbound triple left-turn lane and widening SR 161 southbound to accommodate it; and an eastbound right-turn lane; Reduce costs at the SR-99 / S 356'" Street intersection by $2.9 million due to the reduced need to widen S 356'" Street between SR-99 and SR-161 to 5 lanes; Increase costs by $0.3 million to add a WE right-turn lane at SR-16l / Milton Road S. b. c. Concept A with the preservation of the westbound left-turn at SR 18/ SR 161 intersection would: a. Reduce costs at the SR-18 / SR-161 intersection by $2.7 million, due to the eliminated need fora westbound triple-left-turn lane and widening SR-161 southbound to accommodate it; Increase costs by $0.3 million at the SR-161 / S 356'" Street intersection to add a southbound right-turn lane; Increase costs by $0.3 million to add a westbound right-turn lane at SR-161 / Milton Road S. b. c. Concept A with the prohibition of the westbound left-turn at the SR-18 / SR-161 intersection and the addition ofthe S 376'" Street interchange would: a. Reduce costs at the SR-18 / SR-16l intersection by $0.3 million by the eliminated need for a westbound triple left-turn lane, but would then need a 3'" southbound through lane; Reduce costs at the SR-99 / S 356'" Street intersection by $2.9 million due to a reduced need to widen S 356'" Street between SR-99 and SR-16l to 5 lanes; Increase costs by $0.3 million at the SR-16l / S 356'" Street intersection to add a southbound right-turn lane; Increase costs by $0.3 million to add a westbound right-tum lane at SR-16l / Milton Road S. b. c. d. Concept B appears to concentrate too much traffic at the intersection ofSR-161 and S 356'" Street, and cannot meet the City concurrency requirements either as a roundabout or as a signalized intersection. The traffic analysis suggests that the addition of the S 3761h Street interchange will increase traffic volumes in Spring Valley, either on the 16'" Avenue S / S 364lh Way / 12'" Avenue S / S 37200 Way conidorin fi-ont of the new high school, or on SR-99 and S 373'd Street, on which a bridge oyer Hylebos Creek would need to be reconstructed. Howeyer, many stakeholders (including the City of Milton) would want to see this interchange be a part of the package. The Project Advisory Committee's charter agreed that the Committee would work on a consensus basis, so the City of Milton's concerns cannot be dismissed entirely. Nonetheless, FHW A's approval of added access at S 376'" Street could potentially delay other improvements. Therefore, it may be in the City's best interest to support the S 376'" Street interchange in some limited fashion to assure the City of Milton's willingness to support the project. Regardless, any future work must account for the potential for access at S 376'" Street in order to satisfY FHW A requirements that potential access locations be analyzed in revising access at SR-18 and/or SR-161. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approyal of the following positions on the Triangle Study: I. Concept A would be preferred oyer Concept B. Howeyer, ramp alignments in the northeast quadrant of the 1-5 / SR-18 interchange should be reexamined to minimize right-of-way impacts. Even though it can be shown that the S 376th Street interchange would reduce the need to widen S 356th Street to 5 lanes between SR-99 and SR-161, the S 376th Street interchange is recommended only if an altematiye can be designed that would not increase traffic yolumes in Spring Valley. The westbound left-turn movement at the intersection ofSR-18 and SR-161 should be maintained. 2. 3. Staff also recommends that the Committee recommend approyal of an amendment to the project agreement with WSDOT to increase the City's contribution to the project for $15,000 for further analysis of staging and costs. RAP:dl cc: Project File Day File k:\lutc\2002\triangle study dcaft report.doc MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Stripe Rite Contract Amendment I Payement Marking .-.--.--.-.------------.---.---. .--.-.---.--.-.-.--.-.----------------.-----.-.------.--.-.------.-..-- ..- ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER ---I~~~5t-¡- CATEGORY: ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Land UsefTransportation Committee dated June 17,2002. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: On March 19,2001, staff sent a request for quotes (RFQ) to King County and other contractors on the small works roster who have the capabilities of executing pavement marking and channelization services within pre-determined deadlines. The lowest responsive quote received was fÌom Stripe Rite, Inc. at $17,370.00 for basic payement marking services and a contract provision for discretionary work orders on a requested basis. The 2001 work is substantially complete to the City's satisfaction. The contractor has agreed to honor the same unit prices for 2002 work. Staff is proposing to amend the current contract by $30,000 to perform both basic pavement marking services and discretionary work orders in the 2002 year. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At it's June 17,2002 meeting the Land UsefTransportation Committee made the following recommendations: Authorize the City Manager to amend the existing contract with StripeRite, Inc. in the amount of $30,000.00 for basic and discretionary pavement marking and channelization services with an extension of time to December 31, 2002. Funding for this work is already included in the Traffic Division's operating budget. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to authorize the City Manager to amend the existing contract with StripeRite, Inc. in the amount of $30,000.00 for basic and discretionary pavement marking and channelization services with an extension of time to December 31, 2002. Funding for this work is already included in the Traffic Division's operating budget" July 2, 2002 Council Agenda - Stripe Rite Contract amendment I Pavement Marking Page #2 CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDillEFERREDINO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # k<:o"""illagdbms\2002Istripe rite oonlmet .mendmen, p.vement ...rking.doc DATE: June 17,2002 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee /jÆIL ~ FROM: Richard Perez, Traffic Engineer David H. Moseley, City Manager~~.N VIA: SUBJECT: 2002 Citywide Pavement Marking and Channelization - Extension of 2001 Contract BACKGROUND On March 19,2001, staff sent a request for quotes (RFQ) to King County and other contractors on the small works roster who haye the capabilities of executing pavement marking and channelization services within pre-determined deadlines. The lowest responsive quote received was fi-om Stripe Rite, Inc. at $17,370.00 for basic payement marking services and a contract provision for discretionary work orders on a requested basis. The 2001 work is substantially complete to the City's satisfaction. The contractor has agreed to honor the same unit prices for 2002 work. Stalfis proposing to amend the current contract by $30,000 to perfonn both basic payement marking services and discretionary work orders in the 2002 year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the following item be placed on the July 2,2002 Council consent agenda: Authorize the City Manager to amend the existing contract with StripeRite, Inc. in the amount of $30,000.00 for basic and discretionary pavement marking and channelization services with an extension of time to December 31, 2002. Funding for this work is already included in the Traffic Division's operating budget. ,",dJ Con"""F;], k,\lutc\2002\SlripeRi'" """"ion.doc MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# L (:l) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CATEGORY: Regional Disaster Plan I Public & Priyate Organizations in King County I Interlocal Agreement BUDGET IMPACT: I8J CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt,: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memo to the ParkslRecreationIHuman Services and Public Safety Committee dated June 10,2002. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: In accordance with state law WAC 11 8.06-30 and RCW 38.52 authorizes and directs cities to haye emergency management plans, but provides minimal guidance to special purpose districts, businesses and non-profit agencies. The Regional Disaster Plan will allow potentially hundreds of entities to behaye in a coordinated manner following a seyere disruption. Participation in the Regional Disaster Plan is voluntary and a list of the signatories to date is attached. Participation in the plan provides a legal fi-amework within which organizations in King County can share resources in times oflarger scale emergencies. There are five documents included in the plan: The Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement The "Basic Plan" Appendix I: Direction and Coordination Emergency Support Function I: Transportation Emergency Support Function B: Health and Medical Services The Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement has been deyeloped to provide the legal platfonn for resource sharing among participating organizations. A complete copy of the Regional Disaster Plan is ayailable in the Council offices. The following infonnation is attached in the memo: Regional Disaster Plan for Public and Priyate Organizations in King County (infonnation sheet) Plan Executive Summary Frequently Asked Questions Signatory Document Sheet Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement Signatories to the Plan A presentation on the plan was made by Laurel Nelson, Regional Planning Program Coordinator, at the June 10, 2002 ParkslRecreationlHuman Services & Public Safety Committee meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the June 10, 2002 ParkslRecreationlHuman Services & Public Safety Committee, the Committee recommends the Council approye the following: I. Authorize the City Manager to execute the signatory documentation sheet adopting the Regional Disaster Plan. July 2, 2002 Council Agenda - Regional Disaster Plan / Public & Private Organizations in King County Ilnterlocal Agreement Page #2 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement between the City of federal Way and other subscribing members to the Regional Disaster Plan for Public and Priyate Organization in King County. PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye to authorize the City Manager to execute the signatory documentation sheet adopting the Regional Disaster Plan and to execute the Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement between the City of Federal Way and other subscribing members to the Regional Disaster Plan for Public and Priyate Organization in King County." ~;;::A~~~~--:-- - -~ - -- -- ----- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) .---.-.----.----.-.-----.--.- COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # k,lco,,"oillagdbitl'\2002\reg <Ii""", pI", ko """localdoc 5.A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 10, 2002 To: Parks, Recreation, Hnman Services & Public Safety Council Committee From: Ken Mill~bliC Works Director David MoseleVily M\nager Regional Disaster Plan for Public and Private Organization in King County \6-^ Via: Subject: Backl!round: State law WAC 118.06-30 and RCW 38.52 authorizes and directs cities to haye emergency management plans, but provides minimal guidance to special purpose districts, businesses and non-profit agencies. The Regional Disaster Plan will allow potentially hundreds of entities to behaye in a coordinated manner following a seyere disruption. Participation in the Regional Disaster Plan is yoluntary and a list of the signatories to date is attached. Participation in the plan provides a legal fuunework within which organizations in King County can share resources in times oflarger scale emergencies. There are five documents included in the plan: . The Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement The "Basic Plan" Appendix I: Direction and Coordination Emergency Support Function I: Transportation Emergency Support Function B: Health and Medical Services The Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement has been deyeloped to provide the legal platfonn for resource sharing among participating organizations. A complete copy of the Regional Disaster Plan is ayailable in the Council offices. The following infonnation is attached in the memo: . Regional Disaster Plan for Public and Priyate Organizations in King County (infonnation sheet) Plan Executiye Summary Frequently Asked Questions Signatory Document Sheet Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement Signatories to the Plan . . . A presentation on the plan will be made by Laurel Nelson, Regional Planning Program Coordinator, at the June 10,2002 committee meeting. f\-\ Committee Recommendations: Staff recommends the committee approve the plan and forward to the July 2, 2002 Council Consent agenda: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the signatory documentation sheet adopting the Regional Disaster Plan. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Omnibus Legal & Financial Agreement between the City offederal Way and other subscribing members to the Regional Disaster Plan for Public and Priyate Organization in King County. KM:dl k:\prhspslregional disaster plan-king county. doc A-2.. MEETING DATE: July 2,2002 ITEM# -=er- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CATEGORY: 2003-2008 Transportation Improyement Plan BUDGET IMPACT: 0 CONSENT rg¡ RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE rg¡ PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to Land Useffransportation Committee dated June 17,2002, Resolution No. 02-365, Setting the Public Hearing, and a Resolution adopting an extended and revised Transportation Improvement Program and Arterial Street Improvement Plan for 2003-2008, and directing the same to be filed with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improyement Board. SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: In accordance with the requirements of Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 of the Revised Code of Washington, the City of Federal Way adopted its original TIP and ASIP on July 23, 1991. The City is also required to adopt a revised TIP and ASIP on an annual basis that reflects the City's current and future street and arterial needs. These plans identify capital projects that the City intends to construct oyer the next six years. Projects are required to be listed in the TIP in order to be eligible for grant funding. The TIP was presented to the Land Useffransportation Commiitee at the June 17,2002 meeting. The City is required to hold a minimum of one public hearing on the revised plans, which is proposed for the July 2, 2002 City Council meeting. Once the revised plans haye been adopted by Resolution, a copy of the respectiye plans must be filed with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and the Washington State Transportation Improyement Board. The attached Resolution sets the public hearing date for the July 2,2001 City Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 18,2002 meeting, the City Council set the date of the public hearing for the 2003-2008 TIP and ASIP to be held July 2,2002. The Land Useffransportation Committee, at their June 17,2002 meeting, recommends adopting the 2003-2008 TIP and ASIP as presented. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approyal of the attached resolution adopting the 2003 -- 2008 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Arterial Street Improyement Plan (ASIP) and direct staff to file the same with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board." .........-.........................-........... . . ..._.~_.._-_.._..._.--.._... """""""""'-"""""-, CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinancesonty) COUNCIL BILL # 151 reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REY¡SED - 05/1 0/2001 2003-2008 TIP Adoption.doc DATE: June 17, 2002 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land UsefTransportation Committee Richard Perez, Traffic Engineer ~ David H. Moseley, City Manager~ \r" FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: Proposed 2003 - 2008 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Arterial Street Improvement Plan (ASIP) BACKGROUND In accordance with the requirements of Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 of the Revised Code of Washington, the City of Federal Way adopted its original TIP and ASIP on July 23, 1991. The City is also required to adopt a revised TIP and ASIP on an annual basis that reflects the City's current and future street and arterial needs. These plans identify capital projects that the City intends to construct over the next six years. Projects are required to be listed in the TIP in order to be eligible for grant funding. The City is required to hold a minimum of one public hearing on the revised plan, which is proposed for the July 2, 2002 City Council meeting. Once the revised plans have been adopted by Resolution, a copy of the respective plans must be filed with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board. REVISED PLAN Attached for your review and comment are the proposed 2003-2008 TIP and ASIP (Attachment A), and a location map (Attachment B). The six-year TIP and ASIP respond to the Growth Management Act concurrency requirements as well as other emerging needs. Projects are selected based on criteria adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan TP81, which reads, "Prioritize transportation projects considering concUITency, safety, support for non-SOY modes, environmental impacts, and cost effectiveness." The scoring criteria are shown in Attachment C. It should be noted that staff analyzed the effect of increasing the weight of safety measures and decreasing the weight oflevel-of-service standards in the prioritization process. Interestingly, this did not change the outcome of which projects were recommended for inclusion in this year's TIP, although it did change the relative placement of future projects in the Capital Improvement Plan. The proposed plan does not significantly differ !Tom the previous year's plan. It is proposed that four projects be deleted and that six new projects be added to the six-year TIP and ASIP. Completed Projects Projects completed include the following: 23'd Avenue S from S 316'h Street to S 324'h Street, widening to 5 lanes, adding dual left-turn lanes on S 320ili Street, and City Center streetscape improvements; SR-509 at 8'h Avenue SW signalization; 1-5 at SR-18 Design Study. In addition, staff is proposing to delete the 1-5 at S 272"d Street project. This project is not within the City, and was originally listed to offer SEP A mitigation funds to the project's sponsors for developments occurring within the City that would impact this interchange. However, its absence does not restrict the City's ability to provide mitigation if the project's sponsors request it under SEPA. Proposed New Projects The proposed new projects include the following: SR-99 from SR-509 to S 312" Street: This project (currently contained in the Capital Facilities Program in the Comprehensive Plan) addresses a concwrency issue at S 304'" Street and a high corridor collisiou rate. The project would wideu SR-99 to provide HOV lanes, a raised median, sidewalks, and underground utilities. This project would connect the HOV lanes betweeu Phase III (S 284'" Street to SR-509) and Phase 1 (S 312'" Street to S 324'" Street). S 304'. Street at 2St. Avenue S: This project (currently contained in the Capital Facilities Program in the Comprehensive Plan) addresses a concurrency issue at this intersection. The project would add a northbound right-turn lane on 28'" Avenue S and signalize the intersection to be coordinated with the signal at the intersection ofS 304'" Street and Military Road S. S 344'. Street from SR-99 to 16'. Avenue S: This project (currently contained in the Capital Facilities Program in the Comprehensive Plan) addresses a concwrency issue expected to arise now that S 344'" Street is continuous between 9'" Avenue S and SR-99. It is anticipated that this will be au attractive bypass for West Campus employees avoiding congestion on S 348'" Street. The project would widen S 344'" Street to provide left-turn lanes at SR-99 and at 16'" Avenue S, and signalize both intersections. S 356'. Street from SR-99 to SR-161: This project (currently contained in the Capital Facilities Program in the Comprehensive Plan) addresses aconcwrency issue at the intersections ofS 356'" Street with SR-99 and SR-161. Dual left-turn lanes will be needed northbound at SR-161, which will then require two westbound lanes on S 356'" Street to receive them Similarly, two westbound through lanes will be required at SR-99, which will then require two eastbound lanes to receive them Therefore, this project would widen S 356'" Street to 5 lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks and provide the dual left-turn lanes northbound at SR-161. S 320'. Street at 1-5: This project (currently contained in the Capital Facilities Program in the Comprehensive Plan) addresses a concwrency issue and congestion-related safety issue. This project would widen the southbound off-ramp /Tom 1-5 to provide a second left-turn lane and a third right-turn lane at S 320'" Street. 1" Avenue S from S 292'" Street to S 312'. Street: This project (currently coutained in the Capital Facilities Program in the Comprehensive Plan) would widen the shoulders on I" Avenue S to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Land UsefTransportation Committee reconnnend approval of the attached resolution adopting the 2003- 2008 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) and Arterial Street Improvement Plan at a public hearing to be held July 2, 2002. -15 4r1-?6-- 0eQ ~ ~ k,""tcl20021200J.2008 ';p.do< DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN EXTENDED AND REVISED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ARTERIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 2003-2008, AND DIRECTING THE SAME TO BE FILED WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD. (AMENDS RESOLUTION 91-67, 92-117, 93-155, 94-186, 95-210, 96-236,97-258,98-273,99-299,00-316, and 01-341). WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26, the City Council of the City of Federal Way adopted its original Transportation Improvement Program on July 23,1991 (Resolution No. 91-67); and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council updated its Transportation Improvement Program ("Program") on October 19,1993, by its passage of Resolution No. 93-155; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council further updated its Transportation Improyement Program on October 4, 1994 (Resolution No. 94-186); and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council further updated its Transportation Improvement Program on July 18,1995 (Resolution No. 95-210); and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council further updated its Transportation Improvement Program on July 16, 1996 (Resolution No. 96-236); and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement Program on July I, 1997 (Resolution No., 97-258); and RES #_, PAGE I WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement Program on July 7,1998 (Resolution No., 98-273); and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improvement Program on June I, 1999 (Resolution No., 99-299); and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improyement Program on June 20, 2000 (Resolution No., 00-316); and WHEREAS, the Federal Way City council further updated its Transportation Improyement Program on July 17, 2001 (Resolution No., 01-341); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Federal Way has reyiewed the work accomplished under the existing Program and has reyiewed work scheduled to be accomplished according to the updated Program; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the revised Transportation Improvement Program on December 4,2001, in compliance with the requirements of State laws; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined current and future City street and arterial needs, and based upon these findings has prepared a revised and extended Transportation Improvement Program and an Arterial Street Improvement Plan for the ensuing six calendar years; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.77 and 47.26, the City Council is required to annually revise and adopt an extended Transportation Improvement Program and an Arterial Street Improyement Plan; and RES #_, PAGE 2 WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official has adopted the Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS") in Federal Way File No. SEP97 -0030 issued for the City's Comprehensiye Plan amendments adopted in September 2000, which amendments contained essentially the same Transportation Improvement Program adopted herein; WHEREAS, adoption of the Comprehensiye Plan DNS reflects the fact that there will be no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of adoption or implementation of the extended and reyised Transportation Improvement Program and Arterial Street Improyement Plan adopted herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section L Pro!!fam Adopted. The extended and reyised Transportation Improyement Program and Arterial Street Improvement Plan for the City of Federal Way for the ensuing six (6) calendar years (2002-2007 inclusive), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, and which sets forth the City's transportation project locations, types of improvements and the estimated costs thereof, is hereby approyed and adopted. Section 2- Filing ofPro!!fam. Pursuant to Chapter 35.77 RCW, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of this resolution, together with Exhibit A, with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation and a copy with the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or RES #_, PAGE 3 unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effectiye date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective July 10, 2002 upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this - day of ,2002. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. k, Iooooo;""gdb;)), \2 002 ltipamond2003- 200 8. doo K,"',0ITIP""",d2002 RES#_,PAGE4 ~~. Puget Sound , I I 1 1 t - -1 ;¡ , . " if ~~,. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2003-2008 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ""., ' Federal Way City Limits /'/ Potential Annexation Area ~ Street Improvement Projects ,",..' Non Motorized Projects . Intersection Improvement @ Project Map Identification Number -SCALE- 1 Inch equals 5,800 Feet .~ MAP /11-26 Map prinled April 2002 ldala2l1ebhhemlcpma""""p..ml ~~~~~§"~~~~~~~ê~~~~:§~~~~~§~§~ .. ." ~ .§~~; .. ~ ~ .,,§ .. . H " g~ g , -- - - " ~ h q~~ ~ ! ~ . . I: ! §~ "~;; - - " - - - - ~ !~§¡¡~!' ; " " "00_0- P~"""" £ j g £ °. - 0 ¡¡: f. ¡ I i g ~, i ~1 Eo-< § "., tj D1 ~ , , 0 . E . , . 0 " <" ". d :, U iiiß Hi ? .. Æ H MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# -J27l-r a.. ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: P ARKS/RECREA nON COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION ¡g¡ CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: none SUMMARYfBACKGROUND: At a special meeting on July 2, 2002, the City Council will interview applicants to fill two (2) vacant positions on the city's Parks/Recreation Commission. Since there are currently no actiye alternates on the commission, Councilmembers may also choose to make alternate appointments at the same time. The Council will then confirm their appointments during that evening's regular meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: none PROPOSED MOTION: I move the appointment of the following persons to the city's Parks/Recreation Commission with 3-year terms ending on April 30, 2005: (The City Clerk will arrange for introduction and presentation of the appointment certificates for the new appointèes at the July 16th regular meeting) CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED 0511012001 MEETING DATE: July 2, 2002 ITEM# JZZZ( ~) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ETHICS BOARD APPOINTMENT CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION [8J CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: none SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Following the advertisement for the open position on the city's Ethics Board, only one application was receiyed--that of current Boardmember Bill Linehan. At the request of Mayor Burbidge, the City Clerk conducted a telephone poll of Council members to establish if they concur with the reappointment of Mr. Linehan, thus eliminating the interview process at this time. It was the consensus of Council to reappointment Boardmember Linehan at the July 2, 2002 regular meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: none PROPOSED MOTION: I move the reappointment of Bill Linehan to the city's Board of Ethics with a 3-year term ending on June 30, 2005. (The City Clerk will arrange for introduction and presentation of the appointment certificate at the July 16th regular meeting) CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances onty) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001