Council PKT 08-20-2002 Regular
City of Federal Way
City Council Meeting
AGENDA
CO UN CILMEMBERS
Jeanne Burbidge, Mayor
Eric Faison Linda Kochmar
Mary Gates Dean McColgan
Michael Hellickson Mike Park
CITY MANAGER
David H. Moseley
Office of the City Clerk
August 20, 2002
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Council Chambers - City Hall
August 20, 2002 - 7:00 p.m.
(wwwci.ièdemi-wavwau,;
*****
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRESENTATIONS
a.
b.
Youth Baseball Team Introduction
City Manager/Introduction of New Employees
City Manager/Emerging Issues
c.
CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING.
Citizens may addre" City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor. please come forward to the
podium and state your name for the record PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES.
The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are
otherwise inappropriate.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought before
jùll Council for approval; all items are enacted by one motion Individual items may be removed
by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion
a.
b.
c.
Minutes/July 16,2002 Regular Meeting
Vouchers
Quarterly Financial Report/June 2002
School Impact Fees
So 288'" St at SR 99 Signal & Intersection Improvements/85% Design
Status Report/Resolution & lnterlocal Agreement
So 364'" St Culvert Replacement Project Award
King County Office of Emergency Management! Approyal to Accept
Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program
2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant/Approval to Accept A ward/
Resolution
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
Page 1 of 3
VI.
PUBLIC HEARING
Portion of So 3l6th Street Vacation
. Staff Report
. Citizen Comment (3-minute limit per person)
. City Council Deliberation
. Resolution
VII.
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Cancellation of September 3, 2002 Regular Meeting
VIII.
INTRODUCTION ORDINANCES
a.
Council Bill #30llGambling Tax Code Amendment
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER 14, SECTION
14-144, REGARDING THE TAX RATE ON BINGO AND RAFFLES (AMENDS
ORDINANCES 90-15, 90-44, 91-101, 96-268, 96-279, 97-286, 97-301 AND 98-329)
b.
Council Bill #302/Social Services Transitional Housing Unit Code
Amendment
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 22 SECTION
22-669.5 BY REDUCING SEPARA TION REQUIREMENTS FOR SOCIAL SERVICES
TRANSITIONAL HOUSING UNITS.
c.
Council Bill #303/Miscellaneous Code Amendments
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DEFINITION OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES;
CLARIFICATIONS TO PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS;
CORRECTION TO THE DEFINITION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING; AND
EXPANSION OF THE CRITERIA FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL PROJECT-RELATED
REZONES.
d.
Council Bill #304/South 288th Street at SR-99 Intersection Condemnation
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE CONDEMNATION, APPROPRIATION,
TAKING AND/OR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND/OR
EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING AND INSTALLING RIGHT-
OF- WAY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF SOUTH 288TH STREET
BETWEEN 16TH AVENUE SOUTH AND 19TH AVENUE SOUTH, TOGETHER WITH
ALL APPURTENANCES AND RELATED WORK NECSSARY TO MAKE A
COMPLETE IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY
STANDARDS ALL WITHIN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY; AND DIRECTING THE
CITY ATTORNEY TO FILE ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN
THE MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW FOR SAID CONDEMNATION.
Page 2 of 3
Ix.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
x.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
XI.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
a.
b.
Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i)
Collective BargaininglPursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(a)
XII.
ADJOURNMENT
.. THE COUNCIL MAY ADD AND TAKE A CTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA ..
THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND
ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW-FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LIBRARY"
Page 3 of 3
MEETING DATE:
August 20, 2002
ITEM# ~(¿;¿)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[8:] CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the regular City Council meeting held on July 16,2002.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW
requirements.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nfa
PROPOSED MOTION: I moye approval of the minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on July 16,2002.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
.~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLEDillEFERREDINO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
Regular Meeting
July 16,2002 - 7:00 p.m.
OR~f1
Minutes
1.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Burbidge called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the
hour of 7:05 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeanne Burbidge, Deputy Mayor Dean McColgan and
Councilmembers Linda Kochmar, Mike Park, Michael Hellickson and Eric Faison. Mayor
Burbidge excused the absence of Council member Mary Gates.
Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Bob Sterbank and City Clerk
Chris Green.
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Park led the flag salute.
Mayor Burbidge introduced members ofPuget Sound Connection, a local barbershop
quartet who performed several singing selections for all to enjoy. They are the same
musical group who were a part of the recent sister city delegation trip to Tonghae, Korea.
III.
PRESENTATIONS
a.
Ethics Board Introduction/Certificate
Mayor Burbidge introduced and presented William Linehan with his certificate of
reappointment as a member of the city's Ethics Board.
b.
Parks & Recreation Commission Introductions/Certificates
Councilmember Kochmar introduced and presented certificates of appointment to newly
appointed Parks/Recreation Commissioners Cindy Dodge and Jess Birtcher, and also to
alternates Ade Bright and Debra McCormick.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 16, 2002 -Page 2 of8
c.
Parks & Recreation Commission Plaques (outgoing)
Councilmember Kochmar thanked outgoing Parks/Recreation Commissioner Karl Grosch
and presented him with a plaque of appreciation on behalf of the Council and city staff;
she also recognized the past service of Parks/Recreation Commissioner John Morrison-he
was unable to attend the meeting.
d.
City Manager/Introduction of New Employees
Mr. Moseley reported there are no new city employees.
e.
City Manager/Emerging Issues
City Manager Moseley had no emerging issues to bring before Council at this time.
VI.
CITIZEN COMMENT
Glen Steele and David McKenzie - both spoke against locating the Oxford House in the
Twin Lakes neighborhood.
Alex Polson and Dan Casey - focused on specific issues in their opposition to the selection
of the city's proposed transit center location in the downtown area.
Bill May - addressed his concern about the lack of yegetation maintenance on the BP A
trail in the area of the Madrona Meadows neighborhood; the homeowner's association is
also concerned about safety issues because motorized vehicles are able to access the trail.
Al Stipe - expressed his support of the downtown location ofthe city's proposed transit
center; he further called upon citizens to support and believe in Councilmember Gates'
yision for the much needed transportation facility.
H. David Kaplan - requested staff revisit the condition of the city's blueberry farm-there
are major problems with the irrigation system, as well as blackberry vine inyasion; if the
cost is prohibitiye, he would like to see the area deyeloped for use as open passive space.
V.
CONSENT AGENDA
a.
b.
Minutes/July 2, 2002 Regular Meeting - Approved
Corrected Minutes/March 19, 2002 - Approved
Portion of So 3l6th St Street Vacation Request/Resolution
Approved/Resolution No. 02-367
City & Chamber Tourism Enhancement Program Contract Amendment -
Approved
c.
d.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 16, 2002-Page 3 018
Request for Approval to Prepare Code AInendments to Community Design
Guidelines/Use Zone Charts/Addition to 2002 Planning Commission Work
Program - Pulled & approved by separate vote
Policy Reyiew for Neighborhood Traffic Safety Balloting - Approved
2001-2002 Capital Improyement Project/Lakota Park Soccer Field Lighting
Repair Project - Approved
King County Forward Thrust Pool/Kenneth Jones Pool - Pulled &
approved by separate vote
Family Fest Memorandum of Understanding - Approved
Target Corporation Grant Donation Award - Approved
Extension of Agreement with Federal Government/Drug Forfeiture Funds-
Approved
2002 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant - Approved
2002 Washington Traffic Safety Commission Click It or Ticket Grant-
Pulled & approved by separate vote
Dry Cleaning Contract/Public Safety Department - Approved
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
1.
m.
n.
MOTION BY DEPUTY MAYOR McCOLGAN TO APPROVE THE CONSENT
AGENDA; SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER FAISON.
Councilmember Hellickson pulled consent items (e), (h) and (m) for further discussion.
The motion to approve consent items (a), (b), (c), (d), (f), (g), (i), 0), (k), (I), and (n) passed
as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
Consent Item (e): Councilmember Hellickson said he is pleased to see code amendments
being proposed to the community design guidelines on behalf of church rights.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FAISON TO APPROVE THE LAND USE/
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO ADD THREE
CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION WORK
PROGRAM, AND TO PREPARE TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION
BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL; SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON. The motion passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 16, 2002 - Page 4 of 8
Consent item (h): Councilmember Hellickson requested this item be sent back to the
Finance! Economic Deyelopment/Regional Affairs Committee prior to a final decision.
City Manager Moseley explained all final decisions would only be made during the city's
2003-2004 budget process.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR TO DIRECT THE CITY
MANAGER TO CONTINUE DISCUSSIONS WITH KING COUNTY, AND TO
PROVIDE FUNDING ALTERNATIVES FOR THE TRANSFER OF THE
KENNETH JONES POOL AS PART OF THE CITY'S 2003/2004 BIENNIUM
BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION; SECOND BY
DEPUTY MAYOR McCOLGAN. The motion passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
Consent item (m): Councilmember Hellickson requested Public Safety Department
policies be discussed at Council committee leyel before officers waste time on special
emphasis patrols.
MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER KOCHMAR TO APPROVE AND ACCEPT
THE REQUEST FOR THE 2002 WTSC "CLICK IT OR TICKET"
REIMBURSEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,024.10; SECOND BY DEPUTY
MAYOR McCOLGAN. The motion passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
VI.
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
a.
Cancellation of August 6, 2002 Regular Meeting
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR TO SUSPEND COUNCIL RULES
OF PROCEDURE FOR THE PURPOSE OF CANCELING THE AUGUST 6, 2002
REGULAR MEETING; SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON. The
motion passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 16, 2002-Page 5 of8
b.
Branding Logo Consideration
Mr. Moseley introduced Assistant City Manager Donna Hanson who presented samples
and estimated production costs related to different logo applications. She then introduced
Steve Watson of Leonhardt:Fitch, a member of the consulting firm employed by the city;
he explained and presented fiye variations of the branding logo color schemes for the
Council's final selection. Mr. Watson indicated the firm is recommending yersion N os. 1 or
2 as the most representative color combinations for the city's planned logo.
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR TO ADOPT THE PREFERRED
LOGO DEPICTING A MOUNTAIN WITH DARK BLUE AND LIGHT BLUE, OR
DARK BLUE AND GREEN COLORS, AS THE CITY'S OFFICIAL LOGO;
SECOND BY DEPUTY MAYOR McCOLGAN.
Councilmember Kochmar asked if the color should be selected at this time; Ms. Hanson
responded in the affirmative.
COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SAID SHE WOULD LIKE TO AMEND HER
MOTION INDICATING THE SELECTED COLORS ARE BLUE AND GREEN AS
SHOWN ON NO.2. (City Clerk's note: the amended motion second was inaudible)
Councilmember Hellickson indicated there is some dissention between Councilmembers on
the color choice-Councilmember Kochmar noted further discussions focused on different
shades of green. Mayor Burbidge questioned if there had been a second on the amendment
indicating the chosen color.
COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON INDICA TED HE HEARD A SECOND TO
THE AMENDMENT, THEN ADDED A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO ALLOW
DISCUSSION PRIOR TO MAKING A FINAL DECISION ON THE COLOR.
Councilmember Hellickson suggested Councilmember Kochmar remoye her motion from
the table to allow for additional discussion on color choice. Councilmember Kochmar
indicated she prefers discussing at this time, and is open to a friendly amendment since she
has not yet decided on any particular color.
Mayor Burbidge indicated her preference would be to yote on the main motion-to clearly
identify the Council's choice for the new logo symbol itself-followed by a brief
discussion prior to making a final selection of the preferred color.
COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR THEN WITHDREW HER ORIGINAL
MOTION, AND MOVED ADOPTION OF THE PREFERRED LOGO DEPICTING
A MOUNTAIN AS THE CITY OF FEDER\L WAY'S OFFICIAL LOGO; SECOND
BY DEPUTY MAYOR McCOLGAN.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 16, 2002 -Page 6 of 8
The motion to adopt the preferred logo depicting a mountain (absent any color) as the
city's official logo passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
Following a group discussion and seyeral informal polls, Councilmembers narrowed their
yaried individual choices to ultimately agree on the selection of the logo color.
DEPUTY MAYOR McCOLGAN MOVED ACCEPTANCE OF COLOR
SELECTION NO.1 (DARK BLUE/LIGHT BLUE); SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR. The motion passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
no
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
c.
City Council Direction for lnyestigation of Possible Property Acquisition
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FAISON TO DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER,
THROUGH THE COUNCIL'S FINANCE/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/
REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE, TO RESEARCH WAYS IN WHICH THE
CITY CAN WORK WITH CURRENT AND/OR FUTURE OWNERS OF SEATAC
MALL TO ENCOURAGE THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE MALL
CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, INCLUDING THE
POSSIBLE ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S PURCHASE OF THE SEAT AC MALL AS
AN ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; SECOND BY
COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR. The motion passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
d.
West Hylebos Creek Grayel Remoyal at South 373rd Street
City Manager Moseley called upon Surface Water Manager Paul Bucich to present a brief
overview of the project and related costs.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 16, 2002 -Page 7 of8
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER FAISON TO AWARD THE WEST HYLEBOS
CREEK GRAVEL REMOVAL AT SOUTH 373RD STREET PROJECT TO
AMERICON, INc., IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,875.52 WITH A 10%
CONTINGENCY OF $2,887.55 FOR A TOTAL OF $31,763.07, AND TO
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT; SECOND
BY COUNCILMEMBER PARK. The motion passed as follows:
Faison
McColgan
Burbidge
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
Park
Gates
yes
yes
absent
VII.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Kochmar thanked Human Services staff for their outstanding work on the
regional policy committee, especially in light of the county's current funding crisis. She
reminded citizens of the upcoming Kiwanis salmon bake and Fusion eyents.
Councilmembers Park and Hellickson, and Deputy Mayor McColgan had no reports.
Councilmember Faison announced the next meeting of the Land Use/Transportation
Committee is scheduled for August 5, at 5:30 p.m.; he reported the next FinancelEconomic
Deyelopment/Regional Affairs Committee meeting will be held on July 23, at 2 p.m.
Mayor Burbidge reported on recent South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd)
meeting discussions; she also reminded citizens of the summer concert series at Steel Lake
Park and the new theater production at Centerstage.
VIII.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
In response to an earlier citizen request, Mr. Moseley asked Chief Anne Kirkpatrick to
report on illegal fireworks actiyities oyer the 4th of July celebration; she provided a
comprehensiye analysis of police calls for the 24-hour period.
Mr. Moseley reported on the upcoming accreditation for our Public Safety Department; a
team of assessors will arriye on July 27 to conduct an extremely thorough review of
department procedures and operations. The assessors will also conduct a public meeting on
July 29, at 7:00 p.m., in Council Chambers. The police department has worked extremely
hard for the last six years and is looking forward to completion of the accreditation process.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
July 16,2002 -Page 8 of8
He reported on current road improvement projects, reminding citizens the Public Works
Department encourages driyers to use alternate routes surrounding the construction sites
wheneyer possible.
City Manager Moseley expressed his appreciation to the city's Parks/Recreation and Police
Departments for another successful Red, White & Blues Festiyal-the festival and
fireworks were enjoyed by all in attendance, with no significant public safety incidents.
He reminded Councilmembers of the scheduled executiye session to discuss collective
bargaining pursuant to RCW 42.30.l40(4)(a); the expected time being fifteen minutes, with
no action expected.
Ix.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Collective Bargaining/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.l40(4)(a)
At 8:45 p.m., Mayor Burbidge announced the Council would recess to executive session
for approximately fifteen minutes.
At 9:00 p.m., Assistant City Manager Matheson announced an extension ofthe executive
session for an additional 15 minutes.
Councilmembers returned to chambers at 9:15 p.m.
x.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor
Burbidge adjourned the regular meeting at the hour of9:l5 p.m.
N. Christine Green, CMC
City Clerk
MEETING DATE:
~~
ITEM#
y- (f)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
VOUCHERS
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
~ CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$1,490,938.07
$1,490,938.07
$
ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
certifY under penalty of perjury that the materials haye been furnished, the services
cd as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of
, nd tha am Ized to authenticate and certify said claims.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Approve attached youchers pursuant to RCW 42.24
PROPOSED MOTION: I moye approval of Vouchers.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
...~.
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
f:>
CITY 8F ,....--..
. :- ~~ : EDE.RAL
~~ RY'
MEMORANDUM
Date:
July 17, 2002
To:
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee
From:
Tho Kraus, Financial Management Supervisor
Subject:
Vouchers
Action Requested:
Accept the vouchers and forward to the Next Council meeting for approyal.
ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION:
~
~.//~
Committee Chair
~~-:
Committee Member
r;; W>{.J
Hwo- 6a-I-u
k:\finlacctspay\checkrun\mfr cover.doc
r.J-
apChkLst
0711512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 1
Bank: key us bank
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
~
16748207/01/2002 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO0821049228
Voucher: 167482
16748307/03/2002005469 JONES, KEVIN L JULY
Voucher: 167483
16748407/15/2002000083 AARO INC DBA THE LOCKSH26765
Voucher: 167484
16748507/15/2002000385 ACCOUNTEMPS 07604
Voucher: 167485
16748607/15/2002000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 12934
Voucher: 167486 12939
167487 07/15/2002 005266 ADVANCED SAFETY CONCEP1133
Voucher: 167487
16748807/15/2002 006674 AHBL INC
Voucher: 167488
16748907/15/2002000721 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC
Voucher: 167489
JULY 4, 2002
07604418
103923
0081034
0080963
0080999
0081035
0080843
16749007/15/2002 001194 AMERICAN HOSE & FITTINGS576022-001
Voucher: 167490
167491 07/15/2002005822 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENS L02-060011
Voucher: 167491
16749207/15/2002004669 AT&T BROADBAND
Voucher: 167492
16749307/15/2002001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE
Voucher: 167493
849834016
051 0645149
051 0691538
0584948549
16749407/15/2002 000075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 206-409-1539
Voucher: 167494
16749507/15/2002 000575 ATTORNEYS INFORMATION E44324
Voucher: 167495
Inv Date Description
06/28/2002 PWSCIP-ROW; 01-2-29487-3 I
06/18/2002 PRCS-D J MUSIC SERVICES.
06/19/2002 MSFL T-LOCKSMITH SVCS
06/17/2002 TEMP FINANCE OFFICE STA
06/19/2002 PKM-LOCKSMITH SERVICES
06/26/2002 PKDBC-LOCKSMITH SERVIC
06/14/2002 MSHR-BLOODBORNE PATHO
06/21/2002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
06/26/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK
06/24/2002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS
06/25/2002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS
06/26/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK
06/19/2002 SWM-ECOLOGY BLOCKS
06/05/2002 MSFL T-VEHICLE PARTS/FIT
06/12/2002 PS-SUPPLIES. PROELON R
06/27/2002 MSGAC-DMX MUSIC SVC (F
06/15/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV
06/15/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV
06/13/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV
07/02/2002 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME-
05/31/2002 LAW-MONTHLY CHRG. JUNE
Amount Paid
6,710.00
200.00
45.61
707.71
70.33
16.30
1,485.00
55.00
695.65
124.45
23.81
87.04
79.89
19.84
54.85
75.43
20.80
18.25
18.25
38.16
24.36
Check Total
6,71000
200.00
45.61
707.71
86.63
1,485.00
55.00
1,010.84
19.84
54.85
75.43
57.30
38.16
24.36
Page: 1
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 2
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
~
Date
Vendor
Invoice
16749607/15/2002001870 BANK OF NEW YORK
Voucher: 167496
"P
FEDGO97
FEDGO91R
FEDGO96
FEDGO95
FEDGO93
FEBFO693
16749807/15/2002005098 BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO ~249470
Voucher: 167498 249825
249415
249914
249916
249537
249832
249551
2494~5
249433
249473
249432
249510
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
152.65
172.45
152.20
87.20
107.45
91.15
610.68
610.68
515.00
637.77
474.35
16.81
235.88
159.41
153.70
114.66
26.91
16.85
16.85
Check Total
763.10
3,589.55
06/04/2002 MSF-ADMIN MAINT FEE-
06/04/2002 MSF-ADMIN MAINT FEE -
06/04/2002 MSF-ADMIN MAINT FEE -
06/04/2002 MSF-ADMIN MAINT FEE -
06/04/2002 MSF-ADMIN MAINT FEE -
06/04/2002 MSF-ADMIN MAINT FEE-
06/19/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257357
06/28/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257744
06/17/2002 PS-REPAiRS #257341
07/01/2002 PS-REPAIRS #
07/01/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257813
06/21/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257434
06/28/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257745
06/21/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257469
06/19/2002 PS-REPAIRS #
06/18/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257306
06/19/2002 PS-REPAIRS # 257391
06/18/2002 PS-REPAIRS #
06/20/2002 PS-REPAIRS #257405
Page: 2
apChkLst
07/1512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 3
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
1\
-.j
Check # Date Vendor Inyoice
16750007/15/2002001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO I 248071
Voucher: 167500 251064
253102
251092
251060
251068
253993
240516
251099
250605
251882
253355
253542
239086-81
251820
252340
253025
192073-80
251882-01
014090
167501 07/15/2002006518 BOYLE, CAROL
Voucher: 167501
16750207/15/2002004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP 004020
Voucher: 167502 003970
16750307/15/2002005801 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET, OL 7049
Voucher: 167503 7049 -2
16750407/15/2002005472 BURBIDGE, JEANNE 401794A
Voucher: 167504
Inv Date Description
06/27/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/27/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/27/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/25/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/27/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/20/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/21/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/27/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/14/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/17/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/27/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/17/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/27/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
06/03/2002 PRCS-STAFF SUPPORT, GR
06128/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/21/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/14/2002 MSFL T-PRCS 2002 CHEV EX
06/14/2002 MSFL T-PRCS 2002 CHEV VA
06/19/2002 MILEAGE REIMB FOR AWC C
Amount Paid
891.34
352.35
312.09
172.88
172.88
154.39
141.39
138.18
123.98
119.68
911.47
99.99
4.90
86.99
77.19
38.08
31.50
28.29
10.34
199.00
220.69
129.84
15,428.76
96.75
321.85
Check Total
3,867.91
199.00
350.53
15,525.51
321.85
Page: 3
apChkLst
07115/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 4
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
\'I
~
16750507/15/2002000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 5847
Voucher: 167505 5863
5864
5855
5853
5850
5860
5848
5851
5852
5856
5859
5849
5857
5880
5500 CREDIT
5854
5861
5844
5858
5862
5878
16750607/15/2002006159 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES INC 02-43780
Voucher: 167506
16750707/15/2002002036 CASCADIA CONSULTING GR FWMF2002-1
Voucher: 167507
16750807/15/2002001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3325645-9
Voucher: 167508
16750907/15/2002000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 1911
Voucher: 167509 CK# 1916
16751007/15/2002003551 CITY OF KENT 23572
Voucher: 167510
167511 07/15/2002004412 CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS ~083-02
Voucher: 167511
Iny Date Description
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
06/25/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
03/01/2002 PKDBC-CREDIT INV#5500 (D
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
06/18/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
07/01/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
06/25/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA
06/26/2002 PW-REFUND 70% BOND REL
06/05/2002 AG02-44:RECYCLING EDUCA
05117/2002 AG98-184F:S 312TH TO S 32
06/21/2002 PS-TRAVEL EXP (CON F) (DA
07/12/2002 MSF-TRAVEL EXP (CON F) (
06/11/2002 PS-2002/2003 NTOA MEMBER
05/31/2002 PS-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
Amount Paid
2,953.86
1,694.40
1,250.73
856.80
750.80
627.84
556.89
514.35
363.02
357.75
357.60
338.40
167.96
3,712.80
149.25
-839.38
136.00
83.00
68.00
53.64
53.64
19.92
6,332.00
1,167.65
28,516.51
438.80
118.ob
74.66
6,698.35
Check Total
14,227.27
6,332.00
1,167.65
28,516.51
556.80
74.66
6,698.35
Page: 4
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 5
(Continued)
Bank: key us bank
C.heck # Date Vendor
16751207/15/2002 005165 CL YDEIWEST INC
Voucher: 167512
16751307/15/2002003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA
Voucher: 167513
16751407/15/2002 005208 COMMERCIAL CARD SERVI
Voucher: 167514
16751607/15/2002 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF
Voucher: 167516
n
-'\
Inyoice
00214013
T1084956
T1084956-1
JUNE 2002
33477034
33578729
33825057
34212311
33825056
33825059
33825061
33734695
33825052
33747564
34003115
33534958
33641300
33807786
33578733
33861137
3846998
33578734
33549623
28707031
33764109
0002-0937
16751707/15/2002 000771 COSTCO/HRS USA
Voucher: 167517
16751807/15/2002 003536 CREATIVE OFFICE FURNISH 02-52699
Voucher: 167518
16751907/15/2002000939 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C776641
Voucher: 167519
Iny Date DescriDtion
Amount Paid
380.80
130.51
16.58
3,424.08
160.08
146.42
125.13
116.99
100.10
100.10
50.04
49.15
42.49
30.30
26.30
18.39
16.02
226.65
12.15
2.34
11.70
10.81
9.74
6.53
6.02
1,458.20
27.15
7.29
Check Total
380.80
147.09
3,424.08
1,267.45
1,458.20
27.15
7.29
06/18/2002 PWS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL; C
06/27/2002 CLEANING SUPPLIES
06/28/2002 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI
06/28/2002 CITY PROCUREMENT CARD I
06/05/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/12/2002 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/20/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E
06/28/2002 MSF-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/20/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E
06/20/2002 MSHR-OFFICE SUPPLIESIE
06/19/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E
06/14/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
06/19/2002 MSA-OFFlCE SUPPLIES/EQU
06/11/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/26/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/11/2002 PWST-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E
06/13/2002 LAW-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/14/2002 MSA-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQU
06/11/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/21/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
03/01/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
06/11/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/10/2002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
12/17/2001 PWA-OFFICE SUPPLlES-
06/17/2002 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E
06/26/2002 COSTCO CHARGES JUNE 2
05/31/2002 CM-REPLACEMENT OF WRI
05/31/2002 PKRLS-WATER/CLR RNTLA
Page: 5
apChkLst
07/1512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 6
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
::D
I::J
16752007/15/2002000475 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTE 233828
Voucher: 167520 233827
233826
208143
233891
02-162
02-161
207415
207772
207520
206132
16752307/15/2002000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMER3128016
Voucher: 167523 3129788
3130043
3128725
200202
16752107/15/2002004530 CWACONSULTANTS
Voucher: 167521
16752207/15/2002000854 D J TROPHY
Voucher: 167522
16752407/15/2002006605 DCS & ASSOCIATES
Voucher: 167524
16752507/15/2002000438 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J 0898
Voucher: 167525
16752607/15/2002005836 DEYO, DOUG
Voucher: 167526
16752707/15/2002 005842 DPK INC
Voucher: 167527
16752807/15/2002005048 DUPONT FLOORING SYSTE 3486
Voucher: 167528
16752907/15/2002000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11019407
Voucher: 167529 1019463
1019514
1019552
1019515
1019753
1019666
1019759
1019689
1019764
014174
13-AG01-63A
Inv Date Description
06/20/2002 PKCP-ALARM MONITORING ~
06/20/2002 PKCP-ALARM MONITORING ~
06/20/2002 PKKFT-ALARM MONITORING
12/20/2001 PKCP-ALARM MONITORING ~
06/20/2002 PKCHB-ALRM MNTR SVC AC
05/09/2002 CD-EXPR-ENCHANTED PKS t
05/09/2002 CD-EXPR-ENCHANTED PKS r
05/31/2002 PRCS-8 YOUTH COMMISSIO
06/19/2002 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES
06/27/2002 CM-NAMEPLATES FOR NEW
05/16/2002 MSHR-PLAQUE/ENGRAVING
05/04/2002 PWSCIP-LEGAL NOTICE; RF
06/15/2002 PKlPL-ADVERTISE BID LAKO-
06/22/2002 LAW-PUBLICATION OF RFP-
OS/22/2002 PS-NEWSPAPER NOTICE:B
06/21/2002 PS-EXTERIOR REFINISH VAL
06/13/2002 CM-FOOD FOR COUNCILME
06/20/2002 PS-REIM:GLASSES:MOTORC
06/26/2002 AG01-63A:23RD AVE S RDWP
05/31/2002 PKDBC/KFT-CARPET CLEAN
06/14/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/17/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/20/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/21/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/20/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
07/01/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/27/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
07/01/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/28/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
07/0112002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
Amount Paid
120,00
120.00
60.00
120.00
103.00
3,576.97
2,565.64
235.00
67.56
27.20
60.85
925.65
524.70
221.10
422.40
361.32
13.33
50.00
221,851.62
596.00
166.46
103.88
174.18
70.79
25.01
56.14
37.16
36.96
34.38
25.01
Check Total
523.00
6,142.61
390.61
2,093.85
361.32
13.33
50.00
221,851.62
596.00
729.97
Page: 6
apChkLst
07115/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 7
(Continued)
:D
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
167530 07/15/2002 006258 EBS, INC.
Voucher: 167530
167531 07/15/2002000152 ELECTRO PRODUCTS/CABLE100192
Voucher: 167531
16753207/15/2002 000730 ENTRANCO INC 39414
Voucher: 167532
16753307/15/2002001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI5540738
Voucher: 167533
16753407/15/2002 000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0106096
Voucher: 167534 0105038
0105037
16753507/15/2002 004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 100922
Voucher: 167535 100988
100933
100964
100878
100832
101130
101132
101107
16753607/15/2002 001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR 003120
Voucher: 167536 003116
003118
003119
003121
16753707/15/2002 001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 037216
Voucher: 167537
16753807/15/2002004704 FARR, CHERYLJ 6/41O2-la\
Voucher: 167538
16753907/15/2002006662 FEDERAL WAY AMATEUR RA CD/HS 7/8/02
Voucher: 167539
167540 07/15/2002 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER CO6l28/02-FWCH
Voucher: 167540
167541 07/15/2002 000285 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPART APR-JUN 2002
Voucher: 167541
Invoice
13128
39414
6/41O2-law
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
2,062.85
116.42
426.00
21.76
4,379.64
4,158.98
1,835.88 .
1,969.28
271.25
271.25
3,260.37
271.25
16.28
166.01
32.55
32.55
34.29
32.50
32.50
36.78
32.50
898.15
182.00
34.24
90.00
24,275.08
Check Total
2,062.85
116.42
426.00
21.76
10,374.50
6,290.79
168.57
898.15
182.00
34.24
90.00
24,275.08
06/26/2002 MSGIS-POST WARRANTY 0
07/02/2002 MSDP - CABLES-
06/28/2002 PW-EXPR:TUSCANY RETAI
06/27/2002 PS-CREDIT REPORTS
07/01/2002 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
06/15/2002 PS-VEHICLE FUEL
06/15/2002 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
04/11/2002 MSFL T-INSTALLING SIRI;:N A
05/02/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
04/16/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
OS/24/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
04/01/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
03/11/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/25/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/25/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/19/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/24/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/24/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/24/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/24/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/24/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/15/2002 AG01-52:DBC LANDSCAPE S
06/04/2002 LAW - TRANSCRIPTION FW \
06/18/2002 REIMBURSEMENT FOR ITE
06/28/2002 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V
06/30/2002 CDB-REMIT PERMIT FEES 2
Page: 7
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 8
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
16754207/15/2002 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
Voucher: 167542
Invoice
~
\'
003871
004004
003847
004003
004015
003927
004014
004005
004006
004036
004035
16754307/15/2002001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIS SIF-JUNE2002
Voucher: 167543
16754407/15/2002 002664 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC 39708
Voucher: 167544
16754507/15/2002004366 FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPAN21087
Voucher: 167545
16754607/15/2002000989 FRED MEYER INC 137244
Voucher: 167546
16754707/15/2002002870 FREEWAY TRAILER SALES I 013273
Voucher: 167547
16754807/15/2002004578 GENE'S TOWING INC
Voucher: 167548
16754907/15/2002001052 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
Voucher: 167549
1372443
014170
16755007/15/2002005847 GLOCK INC
Voucher: 167550
642590
641539
641665
110080-2
Inv Date Description
05/04/2002 PWSCIP-LEGAL NOTICE; RF
06/12/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
04/27/2002 PWSCIP-LEGAL NOTICE; RF
06/12/2002 PKlPL:ADVERTISE BID LAKOl
06/15/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
05/15/2002 PS-NEWSPAPER LEGAL NOT
06/15/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/12/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/12/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/22/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/22/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/30/2002 MSF-REMIT IMPACT FEES F
06/20/2002 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVC
06/25/2002 SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES; MI
06/17/2002 PRKCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIE
06/20/2002 MSFL T-VEHICLE REPAIRS/S
06/14/2002 PS-TOWING SERVICES:CAS
06/18/2002 PKM-FLEET REPAIR & MAIN
06/12/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES
06/13/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES
04/09/2002 PS-GLOCK MODELS 17T WIN
Amount Paid
293.48
232.40
305.44
223.30
99.60
185.92
159.36
152.72
146.08
132.80
132.80
10,558.00
302.40
61.89
45.05
1,243.17
190.19
65.37
54.90
10.79
374.70
Check Total
2,063.90
10,558.00
302.40
61.89
45.05
1,243.17
190.19
131.06
374.70
Page: 8
apChkLst
0711512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 9
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
185876
184553
185875
184554
184552
185878
185877
185880
185883
185879
186573
16755207/15/2002003831 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES 02-007
Voucher: 167552
16755307/15/2002000671 H 0 FOWLER COMPANY
Voucher: 167553
Check #
Date
Vendor
167551 07/15/2002002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C.
Voucher: 167551
ì\
ç¡
Inyoice
1152094
1147329
1150801
5122
16755407/15/2002003841 HEAD-QUARTERS PTS
Voucher: 167554
16755507/15/2002 006671 HEMMER, SHIRLEY
Voucher: 167555
16755607/15/2002 000748 HIGHLINE COMMUNITY CaLL CM-5/24/02
Voucher: 167556
16755707/15/2002002477 HOME DEPOT
Voucher: 167557
C1803R11559
6012306
7020976
5021202
16755807/15/2002003210 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 4620
Voucher: 167558
16755907/15/2002 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC
Voucher: 167559
16756007/15/2002000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
Voucher: 167560
80615
76874
85250
84611
85051
79607
1698090A
Iny Date Description
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
03/14/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
03/14/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
03/14/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/24/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
06/30/2002 PS-POL YGRAPH EXAMS
06/21/2002 PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP
06/12/2002 PKM-GD REPAIR/MAl NT SUP
06/19/2002 PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP
07/01/2002 AG01-109: PKM SANITATION
06/28/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
OS/24/2002 CM-ROOM RENTAL FOR ANN
06/05/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC
06/04/2002 PKDBC-REPAIR/MAINTENAN
06/06/2002 CD-REPAIR/MAINTENANCE S
07/01/2002 AG02-36: STL LAKE SOCCER
06/19/2002 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
06/12/2002 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT
06/27/2002 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
06/25/2002 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
06/26/2002 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT
06/17/2002 PWS-CLASS BASPHALT
06/28/2002 HR/RR-CANON COPIER/PRJ
Amount Paid
14,966.25
10,590.96
6,901.76
5,372.95
37,874.89
5,109.98
775.20
4,871.24
4,522.67
3,44466
1,680.00
125.00
42.87
612.81
26.56
382.50
50.00
50.00
64.19
35.70
56.51
2,651.50
5,626.69
78.44
3,827.04
1,145.06
293.98
86.84
18,699.46
Check Total
96,110.56
125.00
682.24
382.50
50.00
50.00
156.40
2,651.50
11,058.05
18,699.46
Page: 9
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 10
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
~
Date
Vendor
Invoice
~
-1:..
167561 07/15/2002006640 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLES178045513A
Voucher: 167561
16756207/15/2002005231 10S CAPITAL INC
Voucher: 167562
16756307/15/2002006652 JAZZ FOR YOUTH
Voucher: 167563
16756407/15/2002003718 JENKINS, HARDY & ASSOC, PJUNE 2002
Voucher: 167564
16756507/15/2002005656 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP 10698 F
Voucher: 167565
16756607/15/2002002933 JORGENSEN, RONALD THORJAN-APR 2002
Voucher: 167566
16756707/15/2002001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIM JUNE 2002
Voucher: 167567
16756807/15/2002000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE JUNE 2002
Voucher: 167568
16756907/15/2002003713 KING COUNTY PUBLIC HEALT014175
Voucher: 167569
16757007/15/2002003898 KING COUNTY RADIO
Voucher: 167570
55508615
20020471
10698 F
301424
36038
35486
35430
35544
35247
167571 07/15/2002003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO092104-9129
Voucher: 167571
16757207/15/2002000376 KING COUNTY WATER & LANWRIA9-39-102
Voucher: 167572
Inv Date Description
05/12/2002 PS-ADVERTISING EXP:JOB A
06/27/2002 MSM&D-COPIER RENTAL
07/01/2002 PRCS-ENTERTAINMENT FO
06/30/2002 AG01-7: PUBLIC DEFENDER ~
06/19/2002 PS-DETAIL SVCS #518
07/02/2002 PKRCS-TAI CHI PROGRAMS
07/01/2002 MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM F
07/01/2002 MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES R
06/18/2002 PRCS-FOOD HANDLERS PE
06/30/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES -
06/26/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES -
06/26/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES -
06/26/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES -
06/2612002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES -
06/26/2002 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES -
07/05/2002 PWS-ROW 01-2-08745-2KNT I
06/04/2002 SWM-WRIA9 SERVICES, iN
Amount Paid
508.44
2,604.83
400.00
16,752.72
139.00
1,457.28
906.56
321.00
8.00
4,297.50
10.71
259.46
170.00
115.81
85.00
12,390.00
3,44400
Check Total
508.44
2,604.83
400.00
16,752.72
139.00
1,457.28
906.56
321.00
8.00
4,938.48
12,390.00
3,44400
Page: 10
apChkLst
0711512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 11
Bank: key us' bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
:s!
V\
16757307/15/2002003137 KING COUNTY-TREASURY DI 0408-218000-
Voucher: 167573 0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
0408-218000-
515100063014
515100063520
515100062957
51510063121
515100062822
515100062762
515100063035
515100063521
515100062773
515100062910
515100063468
515100063272
515100063359
515100063619
515100063519
563100
16757407/15/2002000201 KINKO'S INC
Voucher: 167574
16757507/15/2002 000201 KINKO'S INC
Voucher: 167575
16757607/15/2002006420 KIPP BROTHERS
Voucher: 167576
167577 07/15/2002 002128 KLEINS COMMERCIAL DOOR 1556
Voucher: 167577
Inv Date Description
06/22/2002 PKM-IMPROVEMENT ASSESó
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/2212002 PKM-IMPROVEMENT ASSESó
06/22/2002 PKM-IMPROVEMENT ASSESó
06/22/2002 PKM-IMPROVEMENT ASSESó
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMÈNT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
06/22/2002 PKM: IMPROVEMENT ASSES:
OS/29/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
06/27/2002 CDPL - COPIES OF COMP P
OS/24/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
06/05/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
05/17/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
05/14/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
05/30/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
06/27/2002 CDPL - COPIES OF COMP P
05/15/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
OS/22/2002 CDPL - LARGE PLAN COPIES
06/24/2002 SWM/CIP-PRINTING SERVIC
06/12/2002 PKRCS'PRINTING SVCS-
06/18/2002 LAW-PRINTING SERVICES-
07/03/2002 SWM/CIP-PRINTING SERVIC
06/27/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES
05/07/2002 PRCS-GENERAL STORE ME
06/27/2002 PKM-DOOR REPAIR SVCS
Amount Paid
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
45.70
35.19
30.46
26,11
26.11
9,79
8,16
244,80
6,53
4,90
159,33
80,08
30,03
215.42
17.95
153.80
485,79
Check Total
338,08
437.75
502.81
153.80
48579
Page: 11
apChkLst
07/1512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 12
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid
16757807/15/2002702078 KOREAN METHODIST CHURC02-33711 06/25/2002 PW-REFUND ADMN DEPOSI 1,070.00
Voucher: 167578
16757907/15/2002 006614 KURKOVA, MARINA 014156 06/20/2002 MSHR-EDUC ASSNTITUITI 232.40
Voucher: 167579 014173 06/18/2002 PS-REIMB:TUITION PSSA CO 58.10
167580 07/15/2002 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI 822402 06/19/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 175.57
Voucher: 167580 888103 06/19/2002 PKM-MNTN OFFICE WATER/ 12707
2814401 06/19/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 99.35
899802 06/19/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 395.28
888002 06/19/2002 PKM-STEELLAKEIWATER SE 66.88
3088801 06/19/2002 PWS-WATER SERVICE 14.48
101 06/19/2002 PKM-MNTN OFFICE WATER/ 34.21
!2 824102 06/19/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 19.24
896402 06/19/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE 15.68
<5"" 167581 07/15/2002001939 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0012464 06/21/2002 CD-ENPR: MARTIN CANNON 1,280.76
Voucher: 167581
16758207/15/2002 004196 LASER QUEST - FEDERAL WP52402KAW OS/24/2002 PRCS-REC INC TRIP - LASE 110.00
Voucher: 167582
16758307/15/2002004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP 06190207 06/19/2002 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1,093.68
Voucher: 167583 06220213 06/22/2002 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 122.06
167584 07/15/2002 005076 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGE 0033334-IN 06/20/2002 PS-POLICE TARGET SUPPLIE 36.41
Voucher: 167584
16758507/15/2002 005668 LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND June 6 - 25 06/28/2002 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENSE SVC 1,200.00
Voucher: 167585
16758607/15/2002005478 LEBEL, SHELLEY 014184 06/18/2002 PRCS-COSTUMES FOR JUN 145.51
Voucher: 167586 014177 06/23/2002 PRCS-GENERAL STORE ME 78.79
16758707/15/2002 006083 LEONHARDT FITCH 21427 03/29/2002 AG01-148: BRAND DEVELOP~ 5,195.34
Voucher: 167587
16758807/15/2002006648 LEVel 29 DESIGN 4207 06/05/2002 PWSWR-PRINTING SERVIC 291.26
Voucher: 167588
Check Total
1,070.00
290.50
947.76
1,280.76
110.00
1,215.74
36.41
1,200.00
224.30
5,195.34
291.26
Page: 12
apChkLst
07115/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 13
(Continued)
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
16759007/15/2002005339 LOWE'S HIW INC
Voucher: 167590
Invoice
!?
..J
2415474052
2415073901
2416174316
2417674954
2414873784
2414973824
2415774168
2414573657
2414873781
2417074673
2417674930
2415874211
2415073870
2417674940
2415273969
2415574089
2417174740
2413773278
2415073872
167591 07/15/2002 006675 MACEACHERN, KIM 104506
Voucher: 167591 104505
16759207/15/2002000874 MACHINERY COMPONENTS I 97193
Voucher: 167592
16759307/15/2002 005043 MACHINERY POWER & EOU GO055801
Voucher: 167593
Inv Date Description
Amount Paid
65.21
55.16
234.22
47.61
-20.20
38.85
32.57
28.01
20.20
20.17
19.55
17.15
16.71
16.22
11.94
11.77
5.52
5.40
4.44
7.00
3.63
248.91
2,617.02
Check Total
630.50
10.63
248.91
2,617.02
06/03/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
05/30/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/10/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/25/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES
OS/28/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP
OS/29/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/06/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
OS/25/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES
OS/28/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP
06/19/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP
06/25/2002 PKCHB-REPAIR/MAINT SUP
06/07/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
05/30/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/25/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES
06/01/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES
06/04/2002 PKDBC-REPAIR SUPPLIES
06/20/2002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES
05/1712002 PKM-MAINT SUPPLIES
05/30/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
07/02/2002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
07/02/2002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
06114/2002 MSFL T-RANSOME MOWER R
05/30/2002 SWMM-EOUIPMENT RENTA
Page: 13
apChkLst
0711512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 14
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid
167595 07/15/2002 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLP 00002655 06/27/2002 CD EPR: U-HAUL FACILITY 596.10
Voucher: 167595 00002664 06/27/2002 AGOO-150A: MISC CODE AME 48561
00002659 06/27/2002 CD-EXPR: ENCHANTED PAR 418.90
00002654 06/27/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 671.64
00002653 06/27/2002 CDPL-PLN EXP REV:STATIO 373.56
00002656 06/27/2002 CD EPR: TRUMAN HIGH SCH 21.38
00002658 06/27/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 361.44
00002662 06/27/2002 CD EPR: ENCHANTED PARK 360.00
00002657 06/27/2002 CD EPR: ENCHANTED PARK 336.34
00002660 06/27/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 180.00
00002663 06/27/2002 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 165.00
00002661 06/27/2002 CD EPR: TRUMAN HIGH SCH 135.00
1\ 00002665 06/27/2002 CD-EXPR:DASH PT TOWNHO 33.00
167596 07/15/2002 000960 MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 4328115X 06/13/2002 LAW-AMERICANS WIDISAB 41.21
c:JV Voucher: 167596
16759707/15/2002000644 MCPHERSON SUPPLY COMP 2002-207 06/05/2002 PRCS-FLAGS FOR GENERAL 108.39
Voucher: 167597
16759807/15/2002 000286 METROCALL 4850322 06/22/2002 MSTEL-PAGER SERVICE 12.88
Voucher: 167598
16759907/15/2002001793 MICROFLEX INC 00013601 05/06/2002 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 275.11
Voucher: 167599
16760007/15/2002004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERN 4713 06/11/2002 PRCS-300 COPIES RW&B FE 257.71
Voucher: 167600
167601 07/15/2002 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE 32723 06/28/2002 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S 32.64
Voucher: 167601
16760207/15/2002005160 MOSELEY, DAVID CM-6/26/02 06/26/2002 REIM CITY BUSINESS EXPEN 148.19
Voucher: 167602
16760307/15/2002 001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR 4104 06/29/2002 AG01-66: LANDSCAPE MAIN 2,281.17
Voucher: 167603 4103 06/29/2002 AG01-66: LANDSCAPE MAIN 749.80
167604 07/15/2002 004445 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0100774-IN 06/19/2002 PKM-SAFETY GLASSES 56.19
Voucher: 167604
Check Total
4,137.97
41.21
108.39
12.88
275.11
257.71
32.64
148.19
3,030.97
56.19
Page: 14
apChkLst
07115/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 15
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
J}
-.t)
16760607/15/2002 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 141120
Voucher: 167606 141343
141231
140812
141089
141378
140259
141144
140585
141171
141321
140273
141061
140435
140223
141077
140613
140413
140518
141228
140620
140178
140503
140293
140384
140960
141380
141294
137408
141086
140275
141009
141172
141058
140338
Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
06/20/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 40.58
06/25/2002 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SU 39.44
06/21/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 30.09
06/12/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOUSUPPLIE 26.97
06/19/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC 24.43
06/25/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 23.49
OS/29/2002 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SU 23.13
06/20/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 21.65
06/05/2002 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SU 21.07
06/20/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 19.94
06/24/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC 18.77
OS/29/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 18.59
06/18/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 18.35
06/03/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC 17.60
OS/28/2002 PWS-MAINT TOOLISUPPLIE 17.29
06/19/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 17.02
06/06/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 15.95
06/01/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 14.34
06/04/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 14.25
06/21/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC 13.30
06/06/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 12.99
OS/28/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 12.70
06/04/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 11.52
05/30/2002 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SU 10.65
05/31/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 42.05
06/15/2002 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SU 10.23
06/25/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE -23.49
06/24/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 8.40
03/19/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 8.37
06/19/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 8.13
OS/29/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 7.39
06/1712002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC 6.95
06/20/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 6.50
06/18/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 6.43
05/30/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE 4.89
Page: 15
apChklst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 16
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
~
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
140521
141055
141096
140182
140984
141163
140755
140562
400102318
16760707/15/2002 004701 NEXTEl COMMUNICATIONS
Voucher: 167607
16760807/15/2002 006200 NORTHWEST NEXUS 3801
Voucher: 167608 4761
5739
02-44574
16760907/15/2002006669 NOVASTAR DEVELOPMENT
Voucher: 167609
16761007/15/2002000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 009351
Voucher: 167610 009766
009447
010180
009040
009771
009291
16761107/15/2002000034 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPA~424944346-01
Voucher: 167611
16761207/15/2002005741 OUTCOMES BY lEVY
Voucher: 167612
16761307/15/2002006010 OWL FENCING INC
Voucher: 167613
16761407/15/2002000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE Ip456698
Voucher: 167614
16761507/15/2002002044 PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY IN 115590
Voucher: 167615
\\
\
JUNE 2002
692
Inv Date Description
06/04/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06118/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE
06/19/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE
OS/28/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE
06/17/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE
06120/2002 PKM-FACILITIES REPAIR SU
06/10/2002 PKM-GRD REPAIR SUPPLIE
06/05/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/28/2002 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME
05/05/2002 MSGAC-MTHLY INTERNET S
06/05/2002 MSGAC-MTHL Y INTERNET S
07/05/2002 MSGAC-MTHLY INTERNET S
06/27/2002 PW-REFUND ADMN DEPOSI
06/19/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI
06/25/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI
06/21/2002 PWST-MAINTENANCE/REPAI
07/02/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/14/2002 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI
06/25/2002 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/18/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/06/2002 PRCS-MISC ITEMS-RW&B E
06/30/2002 AG01-9D: LEGISLATIVE LOB
05/31/2002 PKM-CELPK.PLAY AREA CH
12/06/2001 PKiAD/PL:TITLE ARMSTRON
06/12/2002 SWMM-SAFETY EQUIPMEN
Amount Paid
4.33
3.47
3.46
2.92
2.82
2.70
2.34
2.17
1,585.21
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
37.75
264.38
25.37
6.29
14.58
11.63
10.67
152.28
3,260.32
4,993.92
359.04
303.47
Check Total
594.17
1,585.21
1,500.00
500.00
370.67
152.28
3,260.32
4,993.92
359.04
303.47
Page: 16
apChkLst
0711512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 17
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
16761707/15/2002006440 PAPE MACINERY INC
Voucher: 167617
16761807/15/2002006676 PARKS, NANCI
Voucher: 167618
16761907/15/2002003503 PEAVEY CORPORATION, TH 053256
Voucher: 167619
16762007/15/2002 000101 PETTY CASH 014212
Voucher: 167620
16762107/15/2002001189 PETTY CASH CM-PETTYCAS
Voucher: 167621 014304
167622 07/15/2002 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M014247
Voucher: 167622
16762307/15/2002002822 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CE014236
Voucher: 167623
16762407/15/2002001552 PETTY CASH-KLCC REC DEP 014249
Voucher: 167624
16762507/15/2002001612 POLLARD GROUP INC
Voucher: 167625
16762607/15/2002 005066 PROFESSIONAL TRAINING
Voucher: 167626
16762707/15/2002000512 PUGET SOUND BUSINESS J 740009POBOX 07109/2002 MSA-RENEWAL PSBJ SBSCP
Voucher: 167627
Check # Date Vendor
16761607/15/2002002379 PACIFIC TOPSOILS INC
Voucher: 167616
\1
~
Inyoice
38564
38559
38571
38365
38368
38372
38303
38333
38308
38336
38345
38348
38310
210028600
103924
014212
57883
Inv Date Description
07/02/2002 SWM-SOILISOD DUMP FEES
07/02/2002 SWM-SOILISOD DUMP FEES
07/02/2002 SWM-SOILISOD DUMP FEES
06/28/2002 SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
06/28/2002 SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
06/28/2002 SWM-SOILISOD DUMP FEES
06/27/2002 PWS-SANDY LOAM/DRY SO
06/28/2002 SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
06/27/2002 PWS-SANDY LOAM/DRY SO
06/28/2002 SWM-SOILISOD DUMP FEES
06/28/2002 PWS-SANDY LOAMIDRY SO
06/28/2002 PWS-SANDY LOAMIDRY SO
06/27/2002 PWS-SANDY LOAM/DRY SO
06/12/2002 PWS-EOUIPMENT RENTAL; ¡;
06/21/2002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
06/10/2002 PS-POLICE EVIDENCE SUPP
07/10/2002 LAW - BROCHURE HOLDER
06/27/2002 PARKING REIMB FOR J. SCH
07/09/2002 STAMPS FOR CITY USE (3C
07/03/2002 PKM-MILEAGE/L LEWIS 6/1
07/02/2002 PKDBC-PLANT MATLS:COUR
07/03/2002 PRCS-PARKING SENIOR TR
06/25/2002 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS
CDA-RENEWA 05/30/2002 CDA - MAGAZINE RENEWAL.
Amount Paid
160.00
160.00
160.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
162.50
80.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
530.40
Check Total
1,362.50
530.40
96.00
96.00
158.70
158.70
241.93
24193
214.26
191.86
179.66
406.12
179.66
138.55
138.55
170.82
170.82
142.93
142.93
67.00
6700
75.95
75.95
Page: 17
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 18
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
16762807/15/2002000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 727-469-100-
Voucher: 167628 504-228-100-
980-132-100-
303-218-100-
311-112-700-
004-919-100-
021006-FED
021006 FED
206-T02-8674
253-661-9833
011526256000
~
~
~
16762907/15/2002004502 QC GRAPHICS INC
Voucher: 167629
16763007/15/2002000202 QWEST
Voucher: 167630
167631 07/15/2002005922 QWEST DEX
Voucher: 167631
16763207/15/2002004093 QWEST INTERPRISE
Voucher: 167632
16763307/15/2002006042 R & T HOOD & DUCT SERVICE25800
, Voucher: 167633
16763407/15/2002006611 RAINMAKER SYSTEMS INC SCO360006
Voucher: 167634
16763507/15/2002002093 RALEIGH, SCHWARZ & POWE95815
Voucher: 167635
16763607/15/2002005302 RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAIN 42651
Voucher: 167636
16763707/15/2002006677 RATTERAY, ROSE REFUND
Voucher: 167637
16763807/15/2002000582 RODDA PAINT 24-765022
Voucher: 167638 24-344903
16763907/15/2002003761 ROYAL WALDOCK & ASSOCI 1980
Voucher: 167639
16764007/15/2002000759 S & S WORLDWIDE, INC
Voucher: 167640
167641 07/15/2002005703 SAFEWAY STORE #3501
Voucher: 167641
16764207/15/2002703074 SALTWATERUNITARIANCHUC1948R11557
Voucher: 167642
253-D08-6046
REFUND
3960406
669604
Inv Date Description
06/20/2002 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY C
06/1712002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY
06/14/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY
06/17/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY
06/20/2002 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY C
06/07/2002 PWSWM-ELECTRICITY CHA
06/10/2002 MSFL T-GRAPHICS REMOVA
06/10/2002 MSRM-REPLACE GRAPHICS'
06/16/2002 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC (
06/16/2002 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC (
06/22/2002 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD
07/19/2002 MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES
06/02/2002 PRCS-EQUIPMENT SERVICE
06/26/2002 MSDP-ANNUAL PHONE SUP
07/01/2002 AG99-135A: INS BROKER OF
07/01/2002 AGOO-12B: ROW LANDSCAP
06/21/2002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
06/20/2002 PKDBC-PAINT & SUPPLIES:
06/17/2002 PKDBC-PAINT AND SUPPLIE
06/12/2002 PKM-BACKFLOW TESTING S
06/10/2002 PRCS-MISC ITEMS RW&B E
06/21/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
06/28/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
Amount Paid
1,525.04
2,306.96
1,010.84
5.86
669.46
27.02
489.60
299.20
555.28
60.54
226.10
462.45
10608
3,034.22
5,250.00
13,898.20
58.00
436.30
150.83
50.00
569.11
32.35
124.42
Check Total
5,545.18
788.80
615.82
226.10
462.45
106.08
3,034.22
5,250.00
13,898.20
58.00
587.13
50.00
569.11
32.35
124.42
Page: 18
apChkLst
07/1512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 19
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
11
¡j
16764307/15/2002004849 SAMS SANITARY & MAINTEN 66189
Voucher: 167643 66106
16764407/15/2002006607 SANTMAN, SHANE 014092
Voucher: 167644
16764507/15/2002005984 SCHOOL DAZE INC
Voucher: 167645
16764607/15/2002006241 SCHROEDER, JEANNE
Voucher: 167646
16764707/15/2002000790 SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENC50680432
Voucher: 167647
16764807/15/2002000055 SEATTLE TIMES
Voucher: 167648
16764907/15/2002006672 SEITZ, ANDREW
Voucher: 167649
167650 07/15/2002 001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 627/2495
Voucher: 167650 620/5897
167651 07/15/2002002231 SHELDON & ASSOCIATES IN 96832
Voucher: 167651 96836
16765207/15/2002003755 SHINES, DIANE PS-6/19/02
Voucher: 167652
16765307/15/2002002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC"111857
Voucher: 167653
16765407/15/2002002480 SIGNAL EQUIPMENT INC 16459
Voucher: 167654
16765507/15/2002000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI26817
Voucher: 167655
16765607/15/2002001014 SKCSRA-SOCCER REFEREE APRIL-JUN
Voucher: 167656 APRIL-JUN
167657 07/15/2002 006673 SLEEPER, LAURIE 03-38633
Voucher: 167657
16765807/15/2002003340 SMITH PHD, DAVID H
Voucher: 167658
16765907/15/2002001045 SOS TECHNOLOGIES
Voucher: 167659
205557
014238
070171006
02-48769
16459
207
3015
Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
06/19/2002 PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 618.33
06/12/2002 PKM-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 55.81 674.14
06/14/2002 PRCS-STAFF SHIRTS (8) FO 51.79 51.79
06/21/2002 RCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIES 14.19 14.19
07/10/2002 PS-MEMBER DUES:KC POll 250.25 250.25
06/24/2002 PS-NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIP 37.70 37.70
05/02/2002 MSHR-AD: 1,997.12 1,997.12
07/03/2002 COB-REFUND PERMIT ISSU 52.50 52.50
06/27/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 30.61
06/20/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 27.81 58.42
06/30/2002 CDPL-ENV REV:ST LUKE'S ( 895.99
06/30/2002 CD-ENPR:ENCHANTED PARK 858.88 1,754.87
06/19/2002 PS-FOOD & BEV:DEPT ACCE 112.10 112.10
06/25/2002 SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES; CA 348.29 348.29
06/17/2002 PKKFT-FIRE ALARM INSPEC 674.56 674.56
06/26/2002 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 234.08 234.08
05/31/2002 AG02-40: SOCCER REFEREE 1,840.00
05/31/2002 AG02-40: SOCCER REFEREE 880.00 2,720.00
06/25/2002 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 50.00 50.00
06/14/2002 PS-PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALU 2,087.50 2,087.50
06/17/2002 PRCS-INSTRUCTION OF CO 350.00 350.00
Page; 19
apChkLst
07115/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 20
Bank: kev us bank
(Continued)
16766007/15/2002000002 SOUND VIEW AUTO BODY I 1564
Voucher: 167660
167661 07/1512002002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 1-319734
Voucher: 167661
16766207/15/2002005602 SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES 10981
Voucher: 167662
16766307/15/2002003735 ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
Voucher: 167663
16766407/15/2002005651 STANKATIS, GREG
Voucher: 167664
16766507/15/2002 003851 STERBANK, BOB C
Voucher: 167665
16766607/15/2002000308 SUBURBAN CITIES ASSOCIA 02598
Voucher: 167666
16766707/15/2002006651 SUES RAGS QUILT SHOP INC1727
, Voucher: 167667
1Í37668 07/15/2002 003962 SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC 10460007
Voucher: 167668
16766907/15/2002002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 02F3187
Voucher: 167669
16767007/15/2002000873 TARGET/DAYTON'S CHARGE 1103094482
Voucher: 167670 1103093223
1103091244
1103090176
117788
Check #
Date
Vendor
\';
~
Invoice
0215707019
014131
130350
167671 07/15/2002 001187 TECHNOLOGY EXPRESS
Voucher: 167671
167672 07/15/2002 003085 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION 867858
Voucher: 167672
16767307/15/2002006512 TESSCO INC
Voucher: 167673
16767407/15/2002006033 THE FAB SHOP, LLC
Voucher: 167674
16767507/15/2002004012 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GR 5638620
Voucher: 167675
389053
Z-924
Inv Date Description
06114/2002 MSFLT-VEH BODYWORKl99 (
06/03/2002 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC
06/24/2002 PKC-CELEBRATION PK MITI
06/06/2002 PS-POLICE MEDICAL EXAMS
06/26/2002 PS-UNIFORM DUTY BOOTS:
07/03/2002 CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSE
06/25/2002 SCA MEMBERSHIP MEETING
06/06/2002 PRCS-MISC SUPPLIES FOR F
06/20/2002 MSGIS-SUN ANNUAL MAINTE
06/24/2002 SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES; TE
06/26/2002 PKRCS-FRIENDSHIP THEATE
06/26/2002 PKRCS-FANS FOR PRESCHO
06/24/2002 PKRCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIE
06/21/2002 PKRCS-DAY CAMP SUPPLIE
07/05/2002 MSDP/PK COMPAQ LAPTOP
06/24/2002 MSDP/CD - LABEL MAKER-
06/17/2002 NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHIN
06/10/2002 MSFLT-VEHICLE REPAIR-CR
06/14/2002 LAW-FAIR LABOR STANDAR[
Amount Paid
942.21
51.14
2,202.15
1,123.71
100.00
81.82
162.75
63.51
992.26
116.65
41.31
39.17
7.58
37.28
1,900.00
115.33
735.70
195.30
298.00
Check Total
942.21
51.14
2,202.15
1,123.71
100.00
81.82
162.75
63.51
99226
116.65
125.34
1,900.00
115.33
735.70
195.30
298.00
Page: 20
apChkLst
07/1512002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 21
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
16767607/15/2002 004218 TIMCO INC
Voucher: 167676
167677 07/15/2002 001267 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC
Voucher: 167677
80343
326828
326626
326880
030209
\J
~
16767807/15/2002006644 TOP HAND GLOVE
Voucher: 167678
16767907115/2002005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 8805394
Voucher: 167679
16768007/15/2002005135 TX RX SYSTEMS INC 60298
Voucher: 167680
167681 07/15/2002002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 76181
Voucher: 167681 73931
16768207/15/2002000618 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SU 7926398
Voucher: 167682
16768307/15/2002 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 0000F6588V25
Voucher: 167683 0000F80F4826
16768407/15/2002005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE26315036-001
Voucher: 167684 CREDIT 004-1
26504198-001
26557738-001
CREDIT 003-2
CREDIT 005
CREDIT 003-1
CREDIT 002
CREDIT 003-3
CREDIT 004-2
16768507/15/2002005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE25690372-001
Voucher: 167685
16768607/15/2002000294 VILMA SIGNS 62002
Voucher: 167686
16768707/15/2002006580 WA ENVIRONMENTAL TRN C 00000001337
Voucher: 167687
16768807/15/2002702431 WA JOURNALISM EDUCATIO C1798R11558
Voucher: 167688
60298
62002
Iny Date Description
06/20/2002 PWS-MISC. SUPPLIES: PVC ~
06/08/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
06/15/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
06/17/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
06/07/2002 PWSWR-SAFETY SUPPLIES;
06/06/2002 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
06/11/2002 NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHIN
06/20/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE
06/05/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
06/1712002 PKM-CUSTOM DRY BLEND F
06/22/2002 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
06/29/2002 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
06/28/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
11/30/2001 PWS-CREDIT INV#22478916
06/28/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/26/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
10/1712001 PWS-CREDIT INV#21593654
12/24/2001 PWS-CREDIT INV#22887833
10/15/2001 PWS-CREDIT INV#21538664
10/12/2001 SWM-CREDIT INV#21490083
10/26/2001 SWM-CIP CREDIT INV#2179
11/16/2001 SWM-CREDIT INV#22242032
OS/21/2002 PRCS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL/
06/12/2002 PRCS-4 BANNERS FOR RW&
06/06/2002 PWS-TRAINING: BACKFLOW
06/28/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
Amount Paid
73.94
57.28
247.73
55.90
71.00
116.41
543.47
140.67
51.68
475.73
52.79
14.41
1,610.15
-455.85
278.57
10.88
-10.55
-24.75
-29.92
-3808
-60.06
-142.01
109.32
979.20
695.00
150.00
Check Total
73.94
360.91
71.00
116.41
543.47
192.35
475.73
67.20
1,138.38
109.32
979.20
695.00
150.00
Page: 21
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 22
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
16768907/15/2002006647 WA STATE ASSC OF SENIOR WSASC 2002 05/14/2002 PRCS-WSASC CONFERENCE 130.00 130.00
Voucher: 167689
16769007/15/2002006647 WA STATE ASSC OF SENIOR 043002 05/14/2002 PRKCS-WSASC CONF (AAR 130.00 130.00
Voucher: 167690
167691 07/15/2002000094 WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFF I L41686 06/18/2002 MSF-AUDIT SVCS:IMOIYR} 13,872.90 13,872.90
Voucher: 167691
16769207/15/2002000851 WA STATE PATROL 00016418 06/15/2002 MSDP-DATA STATION SVC 3,416.31 3,416.31
Voucher: 167692
167693 07/15/2002 000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUE JUNE 2002 07/01/2002 MSF-REMIT STATE FEES 44,111.34 44,111.34
Voucher: 167693
16769407/15/2002700316 WASHINGTON ENERGY SER 02-48321 06/27/2002 CDB-APPLICANT CANCELLE 86.36 86.36
Voucher: 167694
16769507/15/2002 000732 WASPC-WA ASSOC SHERIF INVO09370 OS/20/2002 PS-2002 WASPC CONFERENI 1,65000 1,650.00
\\ Voucher: 167695
.~ 16769607/15/2002002567 WEARGUARD 47618455-2 06/15/2002 PKM-UNIFORM SHIRT 27.99 27.99
Voucher: 167696
16769707/15/2002 005565 WELCOME COMMUNICATIO 1961 06/25/2002 MSDP STARTAC BATTERY- 81.52 81.52
Voucher: 167697
16769807/15/2002006116 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CE 802016763 05/31/2002 MSDP-DATABASE/COMM CH 881.56 881.56
Voucher: 167698
16769907/15/2002 000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DIS 290790 06/13/2002 MSFL T-TORO MOWER REPA 297.32
Voucher: 167699 290794 06/13/2002 MSFL T-TORO MOWER REPA 28.89 326.21
167700 07/15/2002 001990 WESTERN LlNENIWELCOME ID19101 06/17/2002 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL- 90.05 90.05
Voucher: 167700
167701 07/15/2002002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 24-111577 06/18/2002 PKM-BIOSWALE GRASS SE 238.00 238.00
Voucher: 167701
167702 07/15/2002 005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL 1582 06/30/2002 PS-FIRING RANGE USE 55.99 55.99
Voucher: 167702
16770307/15/2002 005336 WILSON, JASON PS-6/27/02 06/27/2002 PS-FOOD:EXPLORERS:HER 75.38 75.38
Voucher: 167703
16770407/15/2002 701265 WRPA 014191 06/19/2002 PRCS-MEMBERSHIP DUES - ¡ 90.00 90.00
Voucher: 167704
Page: 22
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 23
Bank: key us bank
~ Date Vendor
16770507/15/2002000520 WSAMA
Voucher: 167705
(Continued)
Invoice
Iny Date Description
07/01/2002 LAW-DUES BCS
07/01/2002 LAW-DUES BCS
07/01/2002 LAW-DUES BCS
07/01/2002 LAW-DUES BCS
07/02/2002 WA Civil Procedure Deskbook
Amount Paid
20.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
417.79
Check Total
03-04 WSAMA
03-04/WSAMA
03-04 WSMAM
0304-WSAMA
16770607/15/2002000375 WSBA-WA STATE BAR ASSO LAW-WA CIVIL
Voucher: 167706
16770707/15/2002006678 XIA, WEIQING
Voucher: 167707
16770807/15/2002006643 ZEBRA PRINTING
Voucher: 167708
50.00
417.79
104507
07/11/2002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C
40.00
40.00
2185
05/04/2002 SWMWQ-PRINTING SERV
1,242.63
1,242.63
Sub total for us bank:
732,558.97
\"t
~
Page: 23
<t
N
¡,;
0>
co
11.
>-
~
0...J
:J~
""'W
" C
.. w
c3u.
- u.
ê 0
¡¡~
õ
:;;
«
U>
<t
.;¡
N
Ö
~
N
-0
"' 0
...IN
"'" -
.s::;1I)
(.):!::
Co...
.. 0
...
'"
CO
on
on-
N
C')
...
.,,-
N
¡¡;
C>
'"
0..
¡,;
"'"
"
..
.s::;
(.)
<
ñi
Õ
I-
"
c
E
C)
.¿
0
Co
e
"'
~
.S
"'
"'"
"
..
.s::;
"
N
N
~1l>
apChkLst
07/15/2002 10:29:46AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 25
Void Checks
Bank code: key
Check # Date
~ õ7715i2õ02
167499 07/15/2002
167515 07/15/2002
167589 07/15/2002
167594 07/15/2002
167605 07/15/2002
\1
\"
-!)
Page: 25
p~'D
apChkLst
07/0112002 11:00:52AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 1
Bank: key us bank
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
16747507/01/2002002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C.
Voucher: 167475
183513
183514
183515
183516
183512
183511
185881
013986
\\
~
16747607/01/2002001897 JEPSEN, BRUCE
Voucher: 167476
167477 07/01/2002 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO150050-0010
Voucher: 167477
16747807/01/2002 001166 PETTY CASH
Voucher: 167478
16747907/01/2002006636 THE HIGH ROLLERS
Voucher: 167479
JULY 4, 2002
JULY 4,2002
Inv Date Description
02/19/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
02/19/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
02/19/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
02/19/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
02/19/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
02/19/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
04/10/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
07/01/2002 PWT-TRAINING TRAVEL, AI
06/28/2002 PWCIP-ROW; 01-2-29487-3 K
07/04/2002 PRCS-CHANGE FUND FOR R
07/04/2002 PRCS-MUSIC GROUP - RW&
Amount Paid
11,861.29
7,251.80
5,893.67
3,796.55
25,360.36
758.48
312.40
450.00
44,010.00
1,500.00
1,000.00
Sub total for us bank:
Check Total
55,234.55
450.00
44,010.00
1,500.00
1,000.00
102,194.55
Page: 1
N
¡,;
C)
'"
(l.
>-
<
3:
1iÎ..J
::;~
"'W
u C
Q) W
c3u..
-u..
~ 0
ü:~
õ
:;;
<
N
."
Ö
'?
~
~
N
-0
"'0
..IN
... -
.s:::~
Oe
c.....
'" 0
'"
'"
.,,-
0>
N
0
N
Qj
0>
ro
D-
¡,;
...
U
Q)
.s:::
0
:;¡:
¡;¡
Õ
t-
"C
C
'"
ð
.¿
0
c.
~
'"
:s
.S
'"
...
u
Q)
.s:::
u
."
,ch.
apChkLst
07/0112002 1 :27:34PM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 1
Bank: key us bank
Check# Date Vendor
- -
16748007/01/2002002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C.
Voucher: 167480
Invoice
Inv Date Description
03/14/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
03/14/2002 LAW-LEGAL-SVCS (SW356 R
03/14/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
03/14/2002 LAW-LEGAL SVCS (SW356 R
07/01/2002 PWCIP-ROW01-2-08746-1
Amount Paid
2,435.16
14,421.48
657.92
548.67
15,610.00
Check Total
184556
184551
1845850
184555
167481 07/01/2002 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO092104-9221
Voucher: 167481
18,063.23
15,610.00
Sub total for us bank:
33,673.23
Ì\
~
Page 1
p-pLj
'"
¡,¡
'"
co
c..
>-
~
ø..J
::ïi2
""'w
Uc
~w
OIL.
- IL.
~ 0
Ü:¡:
Õ
:;;
c..
...
M
;.:.
<:'!
'"
-0
'" 0
..J",
"'" -
.r: ~
Oe
Co,..
CO 0
N
¡,;
0>
ro
(L
'"
"'"
U
'"
.r:
0
;;:
ëii
Õ
I-
"C
t:
E
0
.¿
0
Co
f!
'"
£
.5
'"
"'"
U
'"
.r:
U
'"
F35
fJ"
apChkLst
0612812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 1
Bank: key us bank
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
\'j
1ft
v
16721906/17/2002003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR C03021 04-9002
Voucher: 167219
16722006/1712002 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR C0302104-9134
Voucher: 167220
167221 06/17/2002003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR C0302104-9123
Voucher: 167221
167222 06/17/2002 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR C0302104-9046
Voucher: 167222
16722306/17/2002 003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR C0302104-9133
Voucher: 167223
16722406/19/2002006612 MACDONALD,HOAGUE & BA SETTLEMENT
Voucher: 167224
16722506/28/2002 000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0642830-1
Voucher: 167225
16722606/28/2002 000385 ACCOUNTEMPS
Voucher: 167226
07522862
07580370
07550005
16722706/28/2002000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 12928
Voucher: 167227 12932
12935
N6835
16722806/28/2002 006515 AGM ELECTRONICS INC
Voucher: 167228
16722906/28/2002006627 ALASKA AIRLINES SAFETY C2102R11458
Voucher: 167229
16723006/28/2002 005901 ALL SPORTS CLOTHING SUPfFW.053002
Voucher: 167230
167231 06/28/2002 000833 ALLEN & ASSOC INC, BRUCE 762240-0020
Voucher: 167231 762240001077
16723206/28/2002001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-48836
Voucher: 167232
16723306/28/2002 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6417
Voucher: 167233
16723406/28/2002 000721 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC 0080507
Voucher: 167234 0080786
Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
05/30/2002 SWMCIP-ROW ACQUISITI 16,410.00 16,410.00
05/30/2002 SWMCIP-ROW ACQUISITI 19,510.00 19,51000
05/30/2002 SWMCIP-ROW ACQUISITI 18,160.00 18,160.00
05130/2002 SWMRIP-ROW ACQUISITI 38,210.00 38,210.00
05130/2002 SWMClp.ROW ACQUISITI 31,510.00 31,510.00
06/17/2002 SEE LAW DEPARTMENT 3,000.00 3,000.00
04/04/2002 MSC-LEGAL MESSENGER S 2.50 2.50
06/03/2002 TEMP FINANCE OFFICE STA 1,200.03
06/11/2002 TEMP FINANCE OFFICE STA 1,107.72
06/05/2002 TEMP FINANCE OFFICE STA 800.02 3,107.77
06/13/2002 PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 130.43
06/14/2002 PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 53.14
06/19/2002 PKCHB/SERVICE CHARGE;- 55.95 239.52
06/05/2002 SWMCIP-EQUIPMENT; ISO 175.19 175.19
06/11/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150.00
05/30/2002 PRCS-SUMMER CAMP T-SH 1,326.08 1,326.08
06/20/2002 PWSCIP-ROW ACQUISITION; 750.00
06/20/2002 PWSCIP-ROW ACQUISITION; 750.00 1,500.00
05/17/2002 PWT-MAINT. SUPPLIES; PY 221.95 221.95
06/01/2002 PKM.AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 86.03 8603
06/05/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 261.12
06/17/2002 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 208.08 469.20
Page: 1
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 2
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid
167235 06/28/2002 003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVC 2245 06/19/2002 AGOO-50:DBC JNTRL MNT S 902.50
Voucher: 167235 2241 06/19/2002 AGOO-50: JNITRL MNT SVCS t 506.55
2246 06/1912002 AGOO-50:DBC JNTRL MNT BI' 475.00
2240 06/19/2002 AGOO-50: JANTRL MNT SVCS 467.50
2238 06/19/2002 AGOO-50:DBC JNTRL MNT S 333.95
2243 06/19/2002 AGOO-50:DBC JNTRL MNT S 315.50
2242 06/19/2002 AGOO-50: JANITORIAL MAINT 303.70
2244 06/19/2002 AGOO-50:DBC JNTRL MNT S 1,634.00
2237 06/19/2002 AGOO-50:DBC JNTRL MAINT ~ 225.30
2239 06/1912002 AGOO-50:DBC JNTRL MNT S 195.30
16723606/2812002 003129 AMS LASER SUPPLY 327491 06/08/2002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 404.46
Voucher: 167236 327470 06/08/2002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 653.56
327595 06/11/2002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 163.20
J1 319419 06/17/2002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER -58.75
ø:; 327503 06/08/2002 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 58.75
16723706/28/2002005079 ANDERSON, SHELLY 014004 06/07/2002 PS-REIMB:EYEWEAR:MOTO 50.00
Voucher: 167237
167238 06/28/2002 005501 ANDREWS, AMY ca20224 06/11/2002 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 140.00
Voucher: 167238 CA01906FW 06/13/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 20.00
CAO023912 06/18/2002 MC-I NTERPRETERCA# 40.00
167239 06/28/2002 000190 APA-AMERICAN PLANNING A 139938 05/31/2002 CDP-MEMBERSHIP DUES/A 175.00
Voucher: 167239
16724006/28/2002006615 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENC02-47451 06/18/2002 PWS-REFUND ROW PERMIT 700.00
Voucher: 167240
167241 06/28/2002 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 0510678441 05/31/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 18.18
Voucher: 167241 0505327646 06/09/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 6.51
0504916115 06/10/2002 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 14.99
167242 06/28/2002 000075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 047-20405718 06/0212002 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME- 1,155.70
Voucher: 167242 047-49095524 06/02/2002 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME- 5.90
167243 06/28/2002 006630 AUSTIN, ANDREA 103347 06/14/2002 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 50.00
Voucher: 167243
167244 06/28/2002 005587 AVAYAINC 2713861057 06/12/2002 MSTEL-SYS MAl NT 1,986.91
Voucher: 167244
16724506/28/2002 003221 AVR PRODUCTIONS JULY 2002 06/11/2002 PKRCS-SOUND & TECHNICI 2,275.00
Voucher: 167245
Check Total
5,359.30
1,221.22
50.00
200.00
175.00
700.00
39.68
1,161.60
50.00
1,986.91
2,275.00
Page: 2
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 3
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
~ Date Vendor Invoice Iny Date Descriøtion Amount Paid
167246 06/28/2002 006583 AVR PRODUCTIONS JULY 4,2002 06/24/2002 ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE: 1,900.00
Voucher: 167246
16724706/28/2002005211 BALANCE CONSULTING INC NOV 12, 2002 06/24/2002 MSF-1099 SEMINAR (KHANH 449.00
Voucher: 167247
167248 06/28/2002 002386 BANHEGYI/ PAWLAK, SUSANCA23809FW OS/28/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 52.50
Voucher: 167248 MERCADO 05/14/2002 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 52.50
23956FW 05/16/2002 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 35.00
167249 06/28/2002 005421 BARGER, KENNETH CA24885 06/03/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 45.00
Voucher: 167249
167250 06/28/2002 000792 BARRY'S TRUCKING & LAND 67439 OS/27/2002 PKM-CEL.PK.-REMOVE TREE 4,18880
Voucher: 167250
167251 06/28/2002006624 BECHTEL CORP 02-47997 04/09/2002 CDB-REFUND PERMIT FEE N 354.25
ì'\ Voucher: 167251 02-48108 04/19/2002 COB-REFUND PERMIT FEE N 354.25
:§ 167252 06/28/2002 003565 BEL CUSTOM CLEANERS 3517 06/04/2002 PS-POLICE UNIFORMS CLEA 2,628.06
Voucher: 167252
167253 06/28/2002 005098 BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO 1249323 06/14/2002 PS-REPAIRS # 536.11
Voucher: 167253 249229 06/11/2002 PS-REPAIRS # 609.36
249109 06/06/2002 PS-REPAIRS # 522.51
249243 06/12/2002 PS-REPAIRS # 16.85
249103 06/06/2002 PS-REPAIRS # 35686
16725406/28/2002 004977 BLiMPIE SUBS & SALADS 014029 06/06/2002 PKM-FOOD FOR PK&REC CO 56.80
Voucher: 167254
16725506/28/2002001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 1250064 06/01/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 126.10
Voucher: 167255 250714 06/03/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 132.14
251164 06/05/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 120.71
248750-01 06/07/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 20.67
167256 06/28/2002 006633 BOCCHI, JANENE 103342 06/14/2002 PKRCS-REFUND DUE TO CL 7.00
Voucher: 167256
16725706/28/2002006416 BOGLE, JAN APR 5-MAY 17 04/23/2002 PRCS-EXHIBITION "IMAGES ( 100.00
Voucher: 167257
Check Total
1,900.00
449.00
140,00
45.00
4,188.80
708.50
2,628.06
2,041.69
56.80
399.62
7.00
100.00
Page: 3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
06/28/2002 10:18:36AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Inyoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
167258 06/28/2002 000007 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS 036484 OS/22/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 240.91
Voucher: 167258 066632 OS/23/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 201.37
098357 OS/2812002 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 176.98
908395 05/14/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 129.70
023430 05121/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 129.03
094031 OS/28/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 124.17
796445 05/07/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.79
796168 05/07/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 92.45
793156 05/06/2002 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 90.04
992834 OS/20/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 54.59
066785 OS/23/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.74
096813 OS/28/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.76
\\ 737077 05/02/2002 MSHR-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 49.61
.--C 772252 05/03/2002 MC-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 46.30
><:f 732263 05/01/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 44.32
813224 05/07/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 41.65
125692 05/30/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.67
807391 05/07/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 39.18
124458 OS/29/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.16
778719 05106/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 33.52
805947 05/07/2002 CM-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 28.97
838700 05/08/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.84
154818 05/31/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 391.24
786138 05/06/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.95
942201 0511512002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 1.23
862377 05110/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.39
92396 05/15/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.54
043643 OS/22/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 14.79
848066 05/09/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.16 2,309.05
167259 06/28/2002 006623 BOTTOM LINE DUO AUG 21,2002 06/11/2002 PKRCS-MUSIC CONCERT 400.00 400.00
Voucher: 167259
16726006/28/2002004657 BOULTER. CHAREE 014034 OS/26/2002 PS-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SP 150.00 150.00
Voucher: 167260
Page: 4
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 5
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
167261 06/28/2002 004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP 003927
Voucher: 167261 003933
003899
00027666
\\
..c:..
167262 06/28/2002 006484 BRONTAPES OF WASHINGT
Voucher: 167262
16726306/28/2002 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN
Voucher: 167263
16726406/28/2002 000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC
Voucher 167264
167265 06/28/2002 003093 CASCADE COMPUTER MAIN
Voucher: 167265
16726606/28/2002 005704 CASCADE ELEVATOR COMPP718
Voucher: 167266 722
167267 06/28/2002 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONC 13497
Voucher: 167267 13986
167268 06/28/2002 004359 CENTURY SQUARE SELF-S 3949
Voucher: 167268
16726906/28/2002005798 CERTIFIED LAND SÊRVICES 190
Voucher: 167269
16727006/28/2002 001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3328836
Voucher: 167270
167271 06/28/2002 005712 CHANG, JENNY CAO024~
Voucher: 167271
167272 06/28/2002 005622 CHELAN COUNTY TREASURE8567
Voucher: 167272 ,
16727306/28/2002000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 1914
Voucher: 167273 CK# 1909
CK# 1913
C1984R11486
5846
5845
20281764
20280773
9054185
CAO024926
16727406/28/2002 700534 CITY OF SEATTLE
Voucher: 167274
16727506/28/2002 003564 CLARY, JOHN
Voucher: 167275
167276 06/28/2002 005507 CLIFTON, THOMAS E
Voucher: 167276
014060
JUN 10,2002
Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
06/14/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 315.90
06117/2002 MSFLT-REPAIRIMAINT SVCS 181.70
06/10/2002 MSFLT-REPAIRlMAINT SVCS 229.20 726.80
06/12/2002 PS-YELLOW BARRICADE TAF 606.23 606.23
06/18/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 96.28
06/18/2002 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA 57.40 153.68
06/1712002 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP 37.55
06/12/2002 PS-COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR ~ 27.50 65.05
06/12/2002 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT 66216 662.16
06/01/2002 AGOO-171: KLCC ELVTR MNT 141.44
06/01/2002 AG01-61: CITY HALL ELVTR S 141.44 28288
OS/23/2002 SWMCIP-CONCRETE, 7/8 A 289.41
06/03/2002 SWMCIP-CONCRETE; 7/8 A 267.65 557.06
06/15/2002 PWSWR-STORAGE RENTAL I 577.50 577.50
05/31/2002 AG02-22: S 288TH ST PROJE( 5,767.84 5,767.84
06/10/2002 AGOO-116A: PACIFIC HWY S 24,010.86 24,010.86
06/13/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 42.75 42.75
05/07/2002 PS-JAIL SERVICES APRIL 20 12,720.00 12,720.00
06/24/2002 PS-TRAVEL EXP CRIMINAL I 82.00
06/24/2002 PS-TRVL EXP FEMALE OFF S 491.70
06/24/2002 PWSWM-TRAVEL EXP 2 6/ 27.00 600.70
06/19/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 150.00 150.00
06/07/2002 PS-DOG EQUIPMENT:K9 UNI 58.76 58.76
06/17/2002 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES 336.00 33600
Page: 5
apChkLst
0612812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 6
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
167277 06/28/2002 003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA
Voucher: 167277
. 167278 06/28/2002 000135 CORDI & BEJARANO INC PS
\).' Voucher: 167278
...c..
~
Inyoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid
T1078584 06/12/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 122.33
T1078130 06/11/2002 PKCHB.JANITORIAL SUPPLI 117.60
W1073814 05/30/2002 MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLlES- 110.28
T1075132.1 06/07/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 87.02
W1073814-1 06/03/2002 MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLlES- 82.25
T1075132 06/04/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 189.64
T1077010 06/07/2002 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 71.72
W1073814-3 06/07/2002 MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLlES- 17.67
W1073814-2 06/05/2002 MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLlES- 61.17
T1072993-1 05/30/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 41.13
T1072992 OS/29/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 39.95
T1072992-2 06/05/2002 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 20.39
MAY 30,2002 06/13/2002 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE MAY 3 150.00
Check Total
961.15
150.00
Page: 6
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 7
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
I
w
16728006/28/2002 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF 29923859
Voucher: 167280 33072069
32919580
33257138
32840744
30127321
33413527
33413521
33413522
33413529
33413524
32919571
33413520
33578727
33477074
32999134
33413511
33440489
33413507
30424770
33072068
33072067
33413526
33413528
33413525
33477061
32919585
30232138
32968001
32919570
30127320
32984953
33072081
33189416
32782407
Inyoice
Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
02104/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 128.29
OS/22/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 125.12
05/16/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 125.12
05/30/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 117.29
05/14/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 114.57
02/11/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 102.82
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 100.10
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 100.10
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 100.10
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 75.08
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 75.08
05/16/2002 MSHR-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 75.07
06104/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 73.93
06/12/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 72.45.
06106/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 71.17
OS/20/2002 CDHS - OFFICE SUPPLIES/EC 69.70
06/04/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 58.64
OS/24/2002 MSC-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQU 52.95
06/04/2002 PKM-CIP-OFFICE SUPPL:IES/ 51.51
02121/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 5009
OS/22/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 5005
OS/22/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 5005
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 50.04
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 50.04
06/04/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 50.04
06/06/2002 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.41
05116/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 44.22
02/14/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 43.70
05117/2002 CD, OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 39.48
05/16/2002 MSMD-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 150.14
02/11/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 39.22
05/16/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI -39.48
OS/22/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 35.69
OS/28/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 35.60
05110/2002 CD/HS OFFICE SUPPLIES/EO 35.28
Page: 7
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check list
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 8
Bank: key us bank
Vendor
(Continued)
Inyoice
Check #
Date
ì1
:i
30739934
30806381
29891407
31704317
31704326
33388432
32999129
33370071
30093305
33108620
30039234
12036418
02-47178
167281 06/28/2002 006616 COSTCO WHOLESALE
Voucher: 167281
16728206/28/2002701112 CRATSENBERG, ANDREW C 1092104-9299
Voucher: 167282
16728306/28/2002003536 CREATIVE OFFICE FURNISH 02-52884
Voucher: 167283
16728406/28/2002000939 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C776637
Voucher: 167284 776636
776710
776639
776712
776633
776709
205984
167285 06/28/2002 000854 D J TROPHY
Voucher: 167285
16728606/28/2002006419 D'VERSIFIED GYMNASTICS & 3239
Voucher: 167286
16728706/28/2002000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMER3127627
Voucher: 167287
167288 06/28/2002 006586 DANCE FACTORY
Voucher: 167288
16728906/28/2002005169 DATABAR INC
Voucher: 167289
JULY 4, 2002
18012
Iny Date Description
03/01/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
03/05/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
02/01/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
04/03/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
04/03/2002 CDHS - OFFICE SUPPLIES/EC
OS/2212002 PWA-OFFICE SUPPlIES-
OS/20/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
05/31/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
02/08/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
OS/2312002 OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUIPMEI
02/07/2002 CD- OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI
06/17/2002 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E
06/12/2002 PW-REFUND 70% DEPOSIT I
06/21/2002 PWSCIP-ROW ACQUISITION;
06/07/2002 SWM-OFFICE SUPPLIES; 22"
05/31/2002 PKDBC-WATERlCL RNTL AC
05/3112002 PKCP-WATER/CLR RNTL AC
05/31/2002 PKRLS-WATER/CLR RNTL A
05/31/2002 PKCHB-WATER/CL RNTL AC
05/31/2002 MC-WATER/COOLER RENTA
05/31/2002 PKKFT-WATER/CL RNTL AC
05/31/2002 PKM-WATER/CLR RNTL ACC
06/19/2002 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES
05/01/2002 PRCS-GYMNASTICS EQUIPM
04/24/2002 MSDP-NEWSPAPER LEGAL 1\
06/24/2002 ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE:
06/13/2002 CM-PSTGE FOR MAILING SU
Amount Paid
30.55
28.82
26.22
20.67
17.82
17.42
13.70
13.39
11.69
11.14
6.03
6.02
1,873.55
1,377.00
184.91
127.30
65.72
56.80
175.81
45.04
6.96
27.42
7.07
497.88
735.90
2,000.00
10,499.89
Check Total
2,623.13
1,873.55
1,377.00
184.91
505.05
7.07
497.88
735.90
2,00000
10,499.89
Page: 8
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 9
(Continued)
Bank: key us bank
Check # Date Vendor
167290 06/28/2002 006629 DAVIS, JIM
Voucher: 167290
167291 06/28/2002006605 DCS & ASSOCIATES
Voucher: 167291
16729206/28/2002006156 DESTINATION WIRELESS
Voucher: 167292
Inyoice
103348
200202
7383
7274&5248
7384
16729306/28/2002005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA CA23913
Voucher: 167293 IA64331
CA24222
1119
167294 06/28/2002 001432 DON SMALL & SONS OIL Dl
Voucher: 167294
16729506/28/2002000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11019200
Voucher: 167295 1019417
. 1019219
1019352
1019418
1019329
1019371
1019361
1019337
1019250
. 1019378
16729606/28/2002 001879 EARTH TECH INC 53644.01
Voucher: 167296 47377-217409
16729706/28/2002006389 EAST OAHU MEDICAL CENTE16131
Voucher: 167297
16729806/28/2002 006007 EASTHILL HARDWARE DBA 00001620
Voucher: 167298
16729906/28/2002 005335 ECO NORTHWEST 4505
Voucher: 167299 4428
16730006/28/2002003948 EDGEWOOD FIREPLACE SH 19977
Voucher: 167300
167301 06/28/2002000343 ELEPHANT CAR WASH
Voucher: 167301
1)
...s;.
VI
200
Iny Date Description
06/1412002 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
05/18/2002 PS-COMPLETE EXTERIOR R
OS/23/2002 PS-il000 CARRY HOLSTER VI
05/09/2002 MSDP/PS FLASHING REPL D
OS/23/2002 PS-ll000RF HOLSTER DW-SF
06/18/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#
06/14/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#
06/11/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#
03/14/2002 PKM-STL LKANNEX FUEL -
06/04/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/14/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/05/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/12/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/14/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/11/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/13/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/12/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/11/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/07/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/13/2002 PS-REPAIR SERVICES
06/07/2002 AG02-20: SURVEYING SERVI
06/07/2002 AGOl-132: 288TH ST/MILITAR
03/25/2002 PS-PHYSICAL EX:PS APPLIC
06/0512002 PKM-COUPLER
05/31/2002 AG01-l04B: CFW MARKET A
04/30/2002 AG01-l04B: CFW MARKET A
06/14/2002 PWS-EQUIPMENT REPAIRS-
05/31/2002 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE
Amount Paid
50.00
361.32
70.70
45.00
41.74
130.00
100.00
120.00
149.55
531.32
296.39
292.02
146.01
143.38
124.24
88.73
539.87
83.23
11.64
48.27
753.00
697.07
506.74
6.30
3,786.55
2,292.06
11.88
179.00
Check Total
50.00
361.32
157.44
350.00
149.55
2,305.10
1,450.07
506.74
6.30
6,078.61
11.88
17900
Page: 9
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 10
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
\\
..r:.
os-
Check # Date Vendor Inyolce
16730206/28/2002005639 ELLINGTON, THOMAS MARK JUNE17-21/02
Voucher: 167302
167303 06/28/2002 006584 EMERALD CITY ENTERAINMEJUL Y 4, 2002
Voucher: 167303
167304 06/28/2002 002887 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 1003639
Voucher: 167304
16730506/28/2002006514 ENGINEERING BUSINESS SY 12951
Voucher: 167305
167306 06/28/2002 000730 ENTRANCO INC 39078
Voucher: 167306
16730706/28/2002 001046 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI5316061
Voucher: 167307 5203945
167308 06/28/2002 006581 ETERRA LLC WA0502TR200
Voucher: 167308
16730906/28/2002004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 101075
Voucher: 167309 101069
101084
101076
101072
16731006/28/2002001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR 003079
Voucher: 167310 003083
001906
002503
003027
003026
003028
003074
16731106/28/2002001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 037217
Voucher: 167311 037211
037210
037209
156-5781288
39078
167312 06/28/2002 000876 FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC
Voucher: 167312
16731306/28/2002003130 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAP1014086
Voucher: 167313
Iny Date Description
06/19/2002 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE 6/17-
06/24/2002 AdditionallanQuaQe:
06/10/2002 MSDP-COLOR PRINTER BE
06/05/2002 KIP 2052STFC TWO-ROLL FE
05/16/2002 AG01-48: 23RD AVE S RD 1M
04/23/2002 Credit Information for March 20
03/25/2002 Credit Information for April 200
06/06/2002 SWM-TRAINING; AUTO CAD 2
06/03/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
05/31/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/06/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/04/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/03/2002 PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES
06/17/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/17/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
12/12/2001 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
03/12/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/10/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/10/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/10/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/15/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
06/15/2002 AG01-59: PKS LNDSCP MAIN
06/15/2002 AG01-59: PKS LNDSCP MNT ~
06/15/2002 AG01-59: PKS LNDSCP MNT ~
06/15/2002 AG01-59: PKS LNDSCP MNT ~
06/12/2002 SWMM-MATERIALS; 12 COR
06/13/2002 PS-FBINAA POLICE CONFER!
Amount Paid
875.00
1,000.00
1,218.42
27,815.81
47,258.95
21.76
21.76
750.00
380.46
240.22
16.28
18.45
18.45
406.84
32.50
221.60
126.84
51.92
51.92
51.92
36.78
905.22
622.34
353.61
509.18
2,992.00
40.00
Check Total
875.00
1,000.00
1,218.42
27,815.81
47,258.95
43.52
750.00
673.86
980.32
2,390.35
2,992.00
40.00
Page: 10
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check LIst
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 11
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
~ Date Vendor
16731406/28/2002 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
Voucher: 167314
Inyoice
003960
003939
003933
003794
003924
003972
003950
003979
003971
003961
16731506/28/2002 004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION S 0614FEPDJUN
Voucher: 167315
16731606/28/2002002332 FEDERAL WAY PRINTING 3167
Vouchet: 167316
\1 167317 06/28/2002 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY 037513
Voucher: 167317
j 16731806/28/2002003066 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 017899
Voucher: 167318 020121
20239
018154
017851
018097
017895
16731906/28/2002 001686 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MAOO050727
Voucher: 167319
16732006/28/2002 006610 FISHER COMMUNICATIONS 9804
Voucher: 167320
167321 06/28/2002 006635 FISHER, CAROL 103349
Voucher: 167321
16732206/28/2002 006028 FREEBORN LAW OFFICES P MAY 2,2002
Voucher: 167322
16732306/28/2002 005439 FREEBORN, SUE
Voucher: 167323
16732406/28/2002 000738 G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY
Voucher: 167324
103349
MAY 2,2002
104454
Iny Date Description
OS/29/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
OS/22/2002 PS-LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT:
05/18/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
04/17/2Ò02 MSMD-NEWSPAPER ADS-
05/15/2002 PKRCS-NEWSPAPER ADS (
06/01/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
OS/25/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/05/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/01/2002 MSMIS-NEWSPAPER ADS-
OS/29/2002 CDPL-NOTICE:
06/13/2002 PS-LUNCH:OFFICER PATRO
OS/28/2002 PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS FL
06/07/2002 PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER
01/28/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~
OS/28/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~
06/05/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~
02/08/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~
01/22/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~
02/05/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~
01/24/2002 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~
05/31/2002 MSHR-COPIER RPR,MNT,SU
06/09/2002 PS-RADIO ADVERTISEMENT:
06/14/2002 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D
06/13/2002 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE MAY 2,
06/13/2002 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE MAY 2,
06/15/2002 PK/GD-SAFETY CLOTHING/S
Amount Paid
199.20
178.64
175.96
205.84
174.48
59.76
159.36
119.52
116.32
106.24
95.25
276.35
1465
27.98
14.99
14.99
12.99
12.99
35.97
12.99
390.70
1,250.00
50.00
100.00
100.00
55.46
Check Total
1,495.32
95.25
276.35
1465
132.90
390.70
1,250.00
50.00
100.00
100.00
55.46
Page: 11
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 12
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Inyoice
16732506/2812002004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC39105
Voucher: 167325
16732606/28/2002003118 GALL'S INC
Voucher: 167326
Iny Date Description
06/13/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES
557344050101 06/0712002 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF
556782220101 06/07/2002 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF
557197690101 OS/24/2002 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF
557183170102 06/04/2002 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF
641671 06/13/2002 PWST-REPAIR & MAl NT SU
04/10/2002 PWS-MISC. MATERIALS; NA
072903
MAY 18-25/02
1134312
1136399
C67106
1140013
1140017
AUG 14,2002
ART EXHIBIT
16733406/28/2002 006622 HALAU HULA 0 NAPUALANI
Voucher: 167334
16733506/28/2002 004268 HARLOR, MARIANNE
Voucher: 167335
16733606/28/2002 005409 HIGRADE CONSTRUCTION A 1007
Voucher: 167336
16733706/28/2002 002477 HOME DEPOT
Voucher: 167337
16733806/28/2002000609 HORIZON
Voucher: 167338
16732706/28/2002001052 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
. Voucher: 167327
16732806/28/2002 001478 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYS 135354
Voucher: 167328
167329 06/28/2002 001177 GILCHRIST CHEVROLET INC CM2226
Voucher: 167329 CM2226
167330 06/28/2002 005671 GLACIER NORTHWEST INC 12939
\\ Voucher: 167330
J . .167331 06/28/2002 001992 . GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS
<:,<:. . Voucher: 167331
16733206/28/2002 000179 GREEN, CHRIS
Voucher: 167332
16733306/28/2002 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY
Voucher: 167333
8010173
3011501
2348181-00
2347588-00
06107/2002 MSFL T-PS DEPT. 2002 CHEV
06/07/2002 MSFL T-LiCENSEIADMIN FEE
05/31/2002 SWMCIP-MISC. Su'PPLlES; C
05/30/2002 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES
06/0412002 MSC-REIMB CONF 6/2-5/2002
05/16/2002 PKDBC- REPAIR/MAINTENAN
OS/21/2002 PKDBC- REPAIR/MAINTENAN
OS/29/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES I
OS/29/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIESI
OS/29/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
06/11/2002 PKRCS-BAND FOR SUMMER
OS/28/2002 PRCS-ART EXHIBIT DISPLAY
05/03/2002 PKM-SKATE PARK ASPHALT
05/14/2002 PKM-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPLI
OS/29/2002 PKM-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPLI
OS/23/2002 PARKS IRRIGATION SUPPLIE
05110/2002 PKDBC-IRRIGATION SUPPLI
Amount Paid
64.06
472.71
111.78
382.93
181.19
1302
27.20
26,990.46
9.25
84.65
32,59
634.92
233.23
186.19
-11.24
20.94
16.10
400.00
100.00
4,341.12
24.93
6.32
508.18
71.87
Check Total
64.06
1,148.61
1302
27.20
26,999.71
84.65
32.59
634.92
445.22
400.00
100.00
4,341.12
31.25
580.05
Page: 12
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 13
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Inyoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid
16733906/28/2002001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 66863 06/03/2002 PWS-CLASS 8 ASPHALT 948.95
Voucher: 167339 75519 06/1112002 SWM-CLASS 8 ASPHALT 168.31
67654 06/04/2002 SWM-CLASS 8 ASPHALT 33.13
66759 05/30/2002 SWM-CLASS 8 ASPHALT 116.14
16734006/28/2002000016 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 16689068 06/05/2002 MSM&D-PS COPIES MCH MN 2,300.76
Voucher: 167340 16693401 06/10/2002 MSDP FAX MCH MAINT MAY: 195.99
167341 06/28/2002002137 INLAND FOUNDRY COMPAN K 28383 06/11/2002 SWM-VANED GRATE 249.55
Voucher: 167341
16734206/28/2002001483 INSTITUTE MGMT ACCOUNTP119338 06/01/2002 MSA-2002 MM8R DUES CMA 14500
Voucher: 167342
16734306/28/2002005231 10S CAPITAL INC 55185002 05/28/2002 MSM&D-COPIER RENTAL61 2,609.77
Voucher: 167343
167344 06/28/2002 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I 8708237 05/31/2002 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE S 1,267.35
ì\ Voucher: 167344
.r.. 167345 06/28/2002 006637 ITE 2002 ITE 2002 714 06/27/2002 PW- ITE 2002 DISTRICT 6 A 375.00
...J:) Voucher: 167345
167346 06/28/2002 005868 JAC08S. LEENA K 0502FW01 05/10/2002 MSA-CNSL TNGrrRNNG SVC 350.00
Voucher: 167346
16734706/28/2002 001815 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC 53249 OS/2312002 PWT-MAINT. SUPPLIES: HE 51.1 0
Voucher: 167347
16734806/28/2002005656 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP 10693 F 06/1012002 PS-DETAIL SVCS # SQUAD#, 278.00
Voucher: 167348
167349 06/28/2002 005934 K P TRANSLATION SERVICE CA22781 04/30/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 90.00
Voucher: 167349 IAO054423 04/19/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 80.00
CA14750 05/07/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 90.00
CA20593 06/04/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 40.00
16735006/28/2002004397 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 21-2 06/01/2002 PWD-ENPR: TRUMAN HIGH S 607.99
Voucher: 167350 21-3 06/01/2002 PWD-EXP REV:E CAMPUS C 48.01
167351 06/28/2002003754 KENT OXYGEN CO INC 1213625-01 06/03/2002 PSWELDING SUPPLIES-SU 60.97
Voucher: 167351
167352 06/28/2002 006589 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIR 01-051-02GIS 04/04/2002 SWM-MAP SERVICE; GIS HO 330.00
Voucher: 167352
167353 06/28/2002 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV 1149686 05/27/2002 PS-KING CO JAIL MARCH/02 I 47,626.57
Voucher: 167353 1134087 05/0612002 PS-KING CO JAIL FOR JAN 2 1,68439
Check Total
1,266.53
2,496.75
24955
145.00
2,609.77
1,267.35
375.00
350.00
51.10
278.00
300.00
656.00
60.97
330.00
49,310.96
Page: 13
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 14
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
16735406/28/2002001898 KING COUNTY FINANCE OFF 7200210
Voucher: 167354
16735506/28/2002000201 KINKO'S INC
Voucher: 167355
16735606/28/2002000201 KINKO'S INC
Voucher: 167356
16735706/28/2002005462 KONTOS, DAVID G
Voucher: 167357
167358 06/28/2002 004298 KOSOFF-ROACH, MELANIE E SPRING SES
Voucher: 167358
16"7.359 06/28/2002 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRi
. Voucher: 167359
\1
~
16736006/28/2002001939 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
Voucher: 167360
167361 06/28/2002005248 LANDON, MICHELLE
Voucher: 167361
16736206/28/2002004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP
Voucher: 167362
515100063165
515100062836
515100063163
515100063343
515100062963
515100063182
515100062928
515100062904
MAY 6, 2002
2049903
460602
3200201
2832301
3278301
2984001
0012337
0012336
014137
05280201
06100206
12080105cr
05250204
014023
16736306/28/2002004386 LEIDER, DAVID
Voucher: 167363
16736406/28/2002003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF '44894
Voucher: 167364 218986
16736506/28/2002000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC 60138
Voucher: 167365 60216
60267
Iny Date Description
05/30/2002 CD/HS LIQUOR PROFIT/EXC
06/07/2002 PS-PRINTING SERVICES
05/19/2002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS-
06/06/2002 PKCIP-PRINTING SERVICES
06/17/2002 SWM/CIP-PRINTING SERVIC
OS/24/2002 PWT-PRINTING SERVICES-
06/07/2002 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS
06/20/2002 CDL - 1 SET OF COPIES OF S
OS/22/2002 CD/HS PRINTING SERVICES
06/13/2002 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE MAY 6,
05/06/2002 AG02-54:RCRTN CLASSES F
06/14/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE
06/14/2002 PKM-STEELLAKEIWATER SE
06/19/2002 PWS-WATER SERVICE
06/11/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWA TER SE
06114/2002 PWS-WATER SERVICE
06/11/2002 PKM-FACILITIESIWATER SE
OS/20/2002 CD-ENPR: MARTIN CANNON
OS/20/2002 CD-ENPR: MOSTAFA NORCE
04/24/2002 MSHR-EDUC ASSNTITUITI
OS/28/2002 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
06110/2002 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
12/08/2001 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
OS/24/2002 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
06/07/2002 PKM-UNIFORM JEANS/D LE
04/2712002 MSFL T-TIRE REPAIR
05/07/2002 MSFL T-TIRE REPAIR
05/30/2002 PKCP-PLAYFIELD SAND-
06/05/2002 PKCP-PLAYFIELD SAND-
0610712002 PWS-MEDIUM BARK-
Amount Paid
3,625.57
304.10
520.61
61.28
472.24
9.79
392.88
53.62
135.95
200.00
1,944.60
94.51
190.35
65.62
13.03
28.87
14.04
316.25
226.25
371.84
1,286.59
1,211.71
-80.51
83.44
128.03
85.02
11.70
18907
74.20
10.75
Check Total
3,625.57
1,760.90
189.57
200.00
1,944.60
406.42
542.50
371.84
2,501.23
128.03
96.72
27402
Page: 14
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15
0612812002 10:18:36AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
~ Date Vendor Inyoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
167366 06/28/2002 006620 LOST CREEK ENTERTAINME~JULY 31,2002 06/11/2002 PKRCS-MUSICAL PERFORMP 400.00 400.00
Voucher: 167366
167367 06/28/2002 005265 LUSEBRINK, DEBBIE MA Y22-24/02 06/11/2002 PRCS-MILEAGE REIMB 5/2 108.04
Voucher: 167367 REIMB 6/5/02 OS/22/2002 PRCS-RT FERRY PORT ANG 62.00 170.04
16736806/28/2002004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLP 00002647 05/31/2002 CD EPR: ENCHANTED PARK 360.28 360.28
Voucher: 167368
16736906/28/2002001004 MAILMEDIA INC 37013 05/1612002 PRCS-MAILING FOR 2002 SU 1,051.64 1,051.64
Voucher: 167369
16737006/28/2002 006631 MATTISON, JILL 103346 06/14/2002 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 250.00 250.00
Voucher: 167370
167371 06/28/2002 005406 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL MAR-JUN/02 06/11/2002 PKRCS-MARTIAL ARTS INS 2,576.00 2,576.00
Voucher: 167371
167372 06/28/2002 005931 MAYER, JENNIFER REIMB 6/7/02 06/07/2002 PRCS-GENERAL STORE IT 85.11
Voucher: 167372 REIMB 6/4/02 06/04/2002 PRCS-OVERNIGHT STAFF T 50.00 135.11
167373 06/28/2002 006634 MCDONALD, VALERIE 103340 06/14/2002 PKRCS-REFUND DUE TO JU 4.45 4.45
-n Voucher: 167373
-.J\ 16737406/28/2002 001793 MICROFLEX INC 00013655 06/05/2002 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 93.35 9335
Voucher: 167374
16737506/28/2002 004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERN 4686 OS/28/2002 PRCS-1000 COPIES RW&B F 846.18
Voucher: 167375 4700 05/31/2002 PRCS-PRINTING SERVICES F 846.18 1,692.36
16737606/28/2002001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE ~755 JULY 02 06/26/2002 AG99-139A: MUN COURT BL 6,646.00
Voucher: 167376 771 JULY 02 06/26/2002 AG98-212B: PS BLDGS LEAS 13,334.60
763 JULY 02 06/26/2002 AG98-212B: PS BLDGS LEAS 4,571.40
2354 JULY 02 06/26/2002 AG93-51: KLCC PARKING LE 499.41
779 JULY 02 06/26/2002 AG98-212B: PS BLDGS LEAS 3,106.00 28,157.41
167377 06/28/2002 006591 MOTT, SHERI 0921049248 06/05/2002 PWSCIP-PROPERTY LEASE; 3,000.00 3,000.00
Voucher: 167377
167378 06/28/2002 000699 MUNICIPAL RESEARCH & SE 1798 06/10/2002 MSGAC-ONLINE CREDIT CA 175.00 175.00
Voucher: 167378
16737906/28/2002 000041 MURTOUGH SUPPLY COMPA 166502 06/1812002 PS-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES 89.39 89.39
Voucher: 167379
167380 06/28/2002 000955 MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPA AB205241S 06/07/2002 SWMM-MATERIALS; REBAR t 20.06 20.06
Voucher: 167380
Page: 15
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 16
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
~
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
167381 06/28/2002001215 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROU 400283148001
Voucher: 167381 400282106-00
400283325-00
16738206/28/2002004701 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 400102318
Voucher: 167382
16738306/28/2002001391 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC C
Voucher: 167383
084200200
083635400
083635490
16738406/28/2002003736 NORTHWEST TOWING INC 6809
Voucher: 167384 6738
25012
16738506/28/2002006608 NW WIRE ROPE & SLING CO 278910
Voucher: 167385 278709
167386 06/28/2002 005678 OKANOGAN COUNTY JAIL, 0 MARCH 2002
Voucher: 167386
167387 06/28/2002 005869 OLYMPIC PRODUCTIONS JULY 2002
Voucher: 167387
16738806/28/2002000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 007891
. Voucher: 167388 16658
009275
APR21-MAY31
ìJ
'^
\'
16738906/28/2002005741 OUTCOMES BY LEVY
Voucher: 167389
16739006/28/2002 004299 OWEN, BROOKE
Voucher: 167390
167391 06/28/2002 002545 PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC
Voucher: 167391
014042
72158
72159
72157
MAY 2002
167392 06/28/2002 004004 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
Voucher: 167392
16739306/28/2002004716 PACIFIC TRANSFER LLC
Voucher: 167393
16739406/28/2002003232 PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF 021
Voucher: 167394
16739506128/2002 006625 PATRIOT FIRE PROTECTION 102-48346
Voucher: 167395
061002-02
Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
06/07/2002 PS-TRAINING SEMINARS-MG 179.00
05/3012002 PS-PROJECT MGT TRAININ 395.00
06/10/2002 PS-GRAMMAR ESSENTIALS ¡ 139.00 713.00
OS/2912002 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME 1,891.70 1,891.70
OS/29/2002 PKM-LiGHT 4WY 20A 277V IV 11.38
02/28/2002 PKCP-LiGHTING SUPPLIES 30.81
03/11/2002 PKCP-LiGHTING SUPPLIES -10.29 31.90
05/10/2002 PS-TOWING SERVICES 174.62
05/10/2002 PS-TOWING SERVICES 145.52
04/01/2002 PS-TOWING SERVICES 116.10 436.24
05/30/2002 SWMM-MATERIALS: CHAIN 184.34
OS/29/2002 SWMCIP-MATERIALS: 3/4" A 57.13 24147
05/31/2002 PS-JAIL SERVICES (MAR/02) 4,62165 4,621.65
06/11/2002 PKRCS-BOOKING FEE FOR 3 400.00 400.00
OS/28/2002 MSRM-PW TOOL REPLACEM 3,271.86
06/14/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 611.34
06/18/2002 SWM-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 41.70 3,924.90
06/13/2002 AG01-9D: LEGISLATIVE LOB 4,139.12 4,139.12
06/11/2002 PS-REIMB:AIRFARE:AVA cm 380.00 380.00
06/13/2002 AG97-18D:CITY HALL-HVAC ~ 1,15002
06/13/2002 AG97-19D:KLL CTR-HVAC S 474.64
06/1312002 AG01-08A:KNUTZEN-HVAC S 403.10 2,027.76
06/05/2002 PS-VEHICLE LEASE 2002 FOf 1,015.01 1,015.01
06/18/2002 PS-POLICE MOVING SVCS~ 6,798.85 6,798.85
03/29/2002 AG96-1671: SW DASH PT RD 6,726.92 6,726.92
05/16/2002 CDPL-REFUND 02-102026-00 59.09 59.09
Page 16
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 17
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Inyoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
16739606/28/2002 000101 PETTY CASH 014139 06125/2002 PWS - FEDWAY CTR MEETIN 471.36 471.36
Voucher: 167396
16739706/28/2002 001166 PETTY CASH 014111 06/21/2002 PRCS-FERRY TOLL - 2002 C 204.42 204.42
Voucher: 167397
167398 06/28/2002 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M014110 06/21/2002 PKM-MILEAGE/L LEWIS 59.26 59.26
Voucher: 167398
16739906/28/2002 006619 PH WEBBERALEY MUSIC, LI JULY 24,2002 06/11/2002 PKRCS-MUSICAL PERFOREr.J 500.00 500.00
Voucher: 167399
167400 06/28/2002 000808 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1666591 06105/2002 PKM-LiGHTING SUPPLIES 152.32
Voucher: 167400 1691964 06113/2002 PKM-LiGHTING SUPPLIES 18.28 170.60
167401 06/28/2002 001612 POLLARD GROUP INC 57507 05124/2002 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS 246.95
Voucher: 167401 57613 05/31/2002 MSM&D-BUSINESS CARDS 134.27 381.22
167402 06/28/2002 005634 PORTLAND PRECISION INS 43972 05131/2002 PS-REPAIR SUPPLIES MAG N 66.80 66.80
Voucher: 167402
\I 16740306/28/2002 000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 557247 05/14/2002 AGOO-107B: LEGAL SVC (SI 14,805.70 14,805.70
-!\ Voucher: 167403
V" 167404 06/28/2002 003829 PRO JET POWER WASHERS 100005816 06/07/2002 PKM-PRESSURE WASHER 678.86 678.86
Voucher: 167404
Page: 17
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 18
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
~
--c..
~ Date Vendor Inyoice
16740706/28/2002000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 345-200-200-
Voucher: 167407 519-842-100-
439-922-100-
444-132-100-
398-842-100-
345-200-200-
534-132-100-
888-389-100-
411-836-477-
669-650-200-
128-255-394-
625-940-200-
536-673-100-
458-148-100-
654-132-100-
604-130-200-
744-132-100-
141-467-100-
487-650-200-
250-275-038-
225-650-200-
112-722-100-
925-940-200-
652-017-100-
483-657-329-
525-940-200-
121-220-200-
190-977-000-
993-440-200-
241-985-100-
733-930-200-
233-930-200-
895-405-100-
168-847-100-
373-087-100-
Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
06/0712002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 3,218.48
06/07/2002 PKM-CITY HALL ELECTRIC IT 2,769.42
06/07/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 2.427.43
06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 1,266.07
06/07/2002 PKRCS-ELECTRICITY/GAS C 988.80
06/12/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 487.26
06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 428.52
06/07/2002 MC-MUNI CT ELECTRICITY C 32741
06/1712002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 314.90
06/12/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 305.93
06/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 278.15
06/10/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 253.43
05/31/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 240.30
06/05/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 23600
06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 232.24
06/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 201.01
06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 200.26
06/05/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 199.73
06/12/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 193.30
06/0412002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 180.10
06/0712002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 176.83
06/0612002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 162.49
06/0612002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 162.24
06/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 161.29
06/18/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 157.34
06/06/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 154.54
06/11/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 153.33
OS/29/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 146.02
OS/24/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 144.73
06/06/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 144.04
06/06/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 138.68
06/06/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 129.35
06/13/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 126.65
06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 125.02
06/05/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 12466
Page: 18
apChkLst
06/28/2002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
(Continued)
Inyolce Iny Date Description Amount Paid
996-289-000- 06/10/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 124.48
736-169-100- 05/30/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 122.62
934-132-100- 06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 121.42
720-429-100- 06104/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 121.15
644-132-100- 06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 117.11
183-469-100- 06117/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 113.20
786-203-100- 06107/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 107.44
420-530-200- 06112/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 106.74
177-437-100- 06/05/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 105.45
904-388-100- 05/31/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 103.92
497-198-100- 06107/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 101.86
454-132-100- 06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 101.54
153-835-100- 06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 100.85
100-093-872- 06103/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 99.54
886-203-100- 06/07/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 98.32
131-066-100- 05/31/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 16,676.92
342-691-100- 05/31/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 97.25
699-699-100- 06/18/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.66
252-150-200- 06/17/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 96.52
544-132-100- 06/07/2002 PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS (MTH 95.71
755-430-200- 06/04/2002 PWT- ELECT~.lCITY CHARGE 88.96
638-448-100- 05/31/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 80.67
472-400-100- 06/17/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 76.85
917-259-100- 06/04/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 64.60
738-448-100- 05/31/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 60.50
062-691-100- 05/31/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 50.19
889-288-100- 06/10/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 40.68
504-368-100- 06/05/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 36.28
352-691-000- 05131/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 26.70
442-691-100- 05131/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 26.70
359-540-200- 06/12/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 25.45
121-220-200- 06/11/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 6.62
221-200-200- 06/11/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 6.62
657-289-000- 06/03/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 6.13
017-470-540- 05116/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 6.06
Bank: key us bank
~
Date
Vendor
ì1
U\.
l",
Page: 19
Check Total
Page 19
apChkLst FinalCheck List Page: 20
0612812002 10:18:36AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Bank: key us bank (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Inyoice Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
177-159-100- 06/04/2002 PKM-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 5.97
170-120-200- 06/06/2002 PWSWM-ELECTRICITY CHA 5.95
733-829-100- 06/04/2002 PWT- ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.92 36,194.50
16740806/28/2002000533 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES 16755 05131/2002 PKCP-BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 351.11 351.11
Voucher: 167408
16740906/28/2002005977 PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS I 31283 06110/2002 PS-BOTTLED WATER SVC 391.68 391.68
Voucher: 167409
16741006/28/2002700536 QUADRANT CORPORATION 01-23613 06/18/2002 PW-REFUND 100% DEPOSIT 5,829.00 5,829.00
Voucher: 167410
167411 06/28/2002 000202 QWEST 206-204-0609 06/04/2002 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC ( 4,642.75
Voucher: 167411 253-815-9920 06/04/2002 MSTEL-PHONElDATA SVC ( 64.64 4,70739
n 16741206/28/2002006606 RANDY'S FLOWERS 006533 04/10/2002 PS-FLOWER ARRANGEMEN1 62.02
'" Voucher: 167412 008010 OS/28/2002 PS-FLOWER ARRANGEMENT 60.93
6'""' 006214 03/28/2002 PS-FLOWER ARRANGEMENT 54.40 17735
167413 06/28/2002 006628 REIS, JACKIE 103350 06114/2002 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS FEE 50.00 50.00
Voucher: 167413
16741406/28/2002006632 RILEY, SUSAN 103343 06121/4002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 8.50
Voucher: 167414 103345 06114/2002 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 4.00 12.50
16741506/28/2002003761 ROYAL WALDOCK & ASSOCI 1931 05129/2002 PKM-BACKFLOW INSPECTI 150.00 150.00
Voucher: 167415
16741606/28/2002006241 SCHROEDER, JEANNE PS-PC 61802 06/18/2002 PS-PARKING:TRAINING:B LI 181.22 181.22
Voucher: 167416
16741706/28/2002006617 SEANOTE PRODUCTIONS JULY 10,2002 06/11/2002 PKRCS-PANDUO PERFORMA 400.00 400.00
Voucher: 167417
16741806/28/2002000351 SEATTLE TIMES-SUBSCRIPT 40680431 06/0512002 PS-NEWSPAPER SUBCRIPT 29.58 29.58
Voucher: 167418
1674190,6128/2002005340 SENIOR SERVICES OF SEAT 014044 05/31/2002 PRCS-SR NUTRITION PROGF 386.25 386.25
Voucher: 167419
16742006/28/2002001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 613/9937 06/13/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 28.15
Voucher: 167420 606/5079 06/06/2002 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES 27.81 55.96
167421 06128/2002002231 SHELDON & ASSOCIATES IN 96811 05/31/2002 CD-ENPR:ENCHANTED PARK 190.00
Voucher: 167421 96744 02/28/2002 CDPL-ENV REV: BLACKBERR 17.50 207.50
16742206/28/2002006513 SHOOTERS MERCANTILE 692 OS/20/2002 PS-AMMUNITION WINCHEST 1,099.30 1,099.30
Voucher: 167422
Page: 20
apChkLst
06/28/2002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 21
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
16742306/28/2002000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI26717
Voucher: 167423
16742406/28/2002003340 SMITH PHD, DAVID H
Voucher: 167424
16742506/28/2002 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC
Voucher: 167425
16742606/28/2002 003307 STERICYCLE INC
Voucher: 167426
16742706/28/2002005921 STL SEATTLE, SEVERN TREN58004326
Voucher: 167427
16742806/2812002000873 TARGET/DAYTON'S CHARGE 047164
Voucher: 167428 043936
043936
JULY 4,2002
JULY 17,2002
16742906/28/2002006585 THE BLUE BERRIES
Voucher: 167429
16743006/28/2002006618 THE ROCKAROOS
Voucher: 167430
167431 06/28/2002006621 THE YES YES BOYS
Voucher: 167431
16743206/28/2002 005534 THOMAS, RYAN
Voucher: 167432
16743306/28/2002005425 TRACY, DAVID
Voucher: 167433
16743406/28/2002006613 TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY 150050-0150
Voucher: 167434 1500500150-2
16743506/28/2002 004544 TRAPPER JENSEN 014025
Voucher: 167435
16743606/28/2002001436 TREE RECYCLERS
Voucher: 167436
16743706/28/2002001715 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN
Voucher: 167437
16743806/28/2002701078 TSS LLC
Voucher: 167438
16743906/28/2002 005253 US BANCORP
Voucher: 167439
~
Date
Vendor
"
"'"
..J
Inyolce
186
198
8589
011379
0001655805
AUG 7, 2002
REIMB 61702
JUN 2-5/2002
20607
20604 .
183939
02-35289
MAY 2002
Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
06/13/2002 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 260.20 260.20
06/05/2002 PS-PRE-EMPLOY PSYCH EW 2,15000
06/05/2002 PS-FIT-FOR-DUTY EVAL:MED 175.00 2,325.00
05/08/2002 PRCS-PUBLISHING FOR SU 5,69939
OS/22/2002 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 475.00 6,174.39
05/31/2002 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 10.86 10.86
06/11/2002 PKM-SOIL TESTING NWTPH-t 65.00 65.00
06/17/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 122.51
05/01/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 20.67
03/24/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 76.08 219.26
06/24/2002 Additionallanquaqe: 1,500.00 1,500.00
06/11/2002 PKRCS-MUSICIENTNMT ACT 1,000.00 1,00000
06/11/2002 PKRCS-PROFESSIONAL DAN 550.00 550.00
06/17/2002 PWS-MILEAGE REIMBURSErv 66.05 66.05
06/13/2002 MC-REIM JUDICIAL CONF E 339.05 339.05
06/20/2002 PWSCIP-ROW ACQUISITION; 750.00
06/19/2002 PWSCIP-ROW ACQUISITION; 750.00 1,500.00
05/30/2002 PKPLICOYOTE REMOVAL;- 200.00 200.00
06/07/2002 PKM-DROP TREES IN CELP 391.68
06/04/2002 PKM-DROP TREES IN CELP 228.48 620.16
06/13/2002 PKM-PESTICIDE SVCS 100.10 100.10
06/18/2002 PW-REFUND 100% DEPOSIT 917.25 917.25
06/24/2002 MSF-CITY TRAVEL EXPENSE 1,184.31 1,184.31
Page: 21
apChkLst
06/28/2002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 22
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyoice
~
"^
cC
16744006/28/2002005254 US BANCORP
Voucher: 167440
167441 06/28/2002002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 73745
Voucher: 167441 75110
167442 06/2812002 000618 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SU 7925715
Voucher: 167442
16744306/28/2002 000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO I 5475985
Voucher: 167443 5482786
5474006
5473383
5478739
5466541
5472644
5461962
5477047
5479653
5472665
5470222
5472551
5459496
5478004
5482787
SC12817
5475983
16744406/28/2002005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE25019786-002
Voucher: 167444 25827440-001
25707110-002
26015000-001
29049430-001
16744506/28/2002 005804 UNITED STATES DEPARTME~08373-53729
Voucher: 167445
16744606/28/2002006509 UP FOR GRABS
Voucher: 167446
16744706/28/2002006626 UPS - COLLIN LIBRARY
Voucher: 167447
MAY 2002
JUL Y.4, 2002
Inv Date Description
06/05/2002 PS-CA RECRUIT TRIP 5/17-
06/04/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
06/13/2002 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE
05/3112002 PKM-PEAT MOSS/GRASS SE
OS/28/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/
OS/28/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/
0511712002 PKM-IRRIGATION
OS/20/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION
OS/28/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/
05/13/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION
OS/28/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
05/09/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/
OS/28/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/
OS/28/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
05/16/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION
05/15/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION
OS/28/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/
05/09/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION
OS/28/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
OS/28/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
05/31/2002 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/
OS/28/2002 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
04/23/2002 PWSWM-CIP/EQPMT RENT
OS/2912002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
OS/21/2002 PWSWM-CIP/EQPMT RENT
06/04/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/05/2002 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
06/03/2002 PKM-WATERFOWL TRANSL
06/24/2002 PKRCS-RWBF:MASTER OF C
C2058R11457 06/17/2002 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE
Amount Paid
442.86
80.44
11.53
523.44
499.75
328.10
316.94
201.81
164.05
139.90
133.75
87.86
71.26
59.76
30.24
25.62
1,046.45
19.48
3.71
18.55
13.04
11.20
63.32
293.80
60.13
1904
33('3
3,345.00
500.00
117.36
Check Total
442.86
91.97
523.44
3,171.47
470.02
3,345.00
500.00
117.36
Page: 22
apChkLst
0612812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 23
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
167448 06/28/2002 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C200472 OS/2812002 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 630.00
Voucher: 167448 200531 OS/28/2002 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 67.60 697.60
167449 06/28/2002 004889 VAN METER & ASSOCIATES I 00-4197 06/1012002 PS-REPORTWRITING SEMIN 115.00 115.00
Voucher: 167449
16745006/28/2002001124 VERIZON WIRELESS, BELLE 1004-652615 06/05/2002 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 975.96 975.96
Voucher: 167450
167451 06/28/2002002073 VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL C EG0803401 06/04/2002 MSHR-PRE-EMPLOYMENT D 49.00 49.00
Voucher: 167451
16745206/28/2002000160 WA STATE CODE REVISER 0 RCW 06/06/2002 MC-LAW BOOKS SELECTED' 90.72 90.72
Voucher: 167452
16745306/28/2002 001033 WA STATE DEPT OF LlCENS 232010034470 06/17/2002 SWM-ENGINEERING LlCEN 100.00 100.00
Voucher: 167453
\\ 167454 06/28/2002 004258 WA STATE DEPT OF LlCENS MAY6-JUN19 06/20/2002 PS-REMIT CPL FEES 1,620.00 1,620.00
Voucher: 167454
f\. 16745506/28/2002 006638 WA STATE DEPT OF LlCENS 0304564 05/31/2002 MC-COPY OF RECORD 5.40 5.40
~, Voucher: 167455
16745606/28/2002004339 WA STATE DEPT OF PERSON0483-D 04/26/2002 FACILITATION & CONSULTIN 500.00 500.00
Voucher: 167456
16745706/28/2002000340 WA STATE INFORMATION S 2002050227 06/04/2002 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE 1,064.92 1,064.92
Voucher: 167457
16745806/28/2002 004628 WA STATE PATROL IDENTI MAY6-JUN19 06/20/2002 PS-REMIT CPL FEES 600.00 600.00
Voucher: 167458
16745906/28/2002000253 WA STATE TRANSPORTATIO 313ATB206111 06/11/2002 PWCIP-GENERAL PROJECT r 197.41
Voucher: 167459 RE313ATB2061 06/11/2002 PWCIP-GENERAL PROJECT r 171.17 368.58
16746006/28/2002005192 WAHl, SANTOSH IA64258 06/14/2002 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 120.00 120.00
Voucher: 167460
167461 06/28/2002 003209 WASHINGTON POLYGRAPH 02-004 05/31/2002 PS-PRE-EMPLOY POL YGRAP 250.00 250.00
Voucher: 167461
16746206/28/2002000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT 0014694-1055 06/0112002 PWSWR-LiTTER DISPOSAL 330.70 330.70
Voucher: 167462
16746306/28/2002 003500 WESCOM COMMUNICATIO 12369 06/06/2002 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST 277.44 277.44
Voucher: 167463
16746406/28/2002 003444 WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS 39562 05/17/2002 PS-UNIFORM CLEANING SVC 782.52 782.52
Voucher: 167464
Page: 23
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
FinalCheck List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 24
Bank: key us bank
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Inyolce
16746506/2812002005830 WESTERN PACIFIC TELEPH 184
Voucher: 167465
16746606/28/2002001427 WESTERN POWER & EQUIP F26866
Voucher: 167466 J34392
16746706/28/2002 002087 WHITMAN GLOBAL CARPET (20589
Voucher: 167467 20278
20590
20588
24-110999
16746806/28/2002002204 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY
Voucher: 167468
16746906/28/2002701265 WRPA
Voucher: 167469
16747006/28/2002 000428 WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASS 2700
Voucher: 167470
167471 06/28/2002004440 WSLEFIA-WA STATE LAW E JULY24-26/02
Voucher: 167471
16747206/28/2002 000947 YOUR INC
Voucher: 167472
~
0-
25520
2805
2807
2804
16747306/28/2002005545 YSIINCORPORATED 420678
Voucher: 167473
16747406/28/2002 000694 lEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMf68717675
Voucher: 167474
Iny Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
06/05/2002 pkCHB-INSTALLATION 3,894.24 3,894.24
05/30/2002 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 934.74
06/11/2002 PWS-MATERIALS CABLE; I 22.03 956.77
06/17/2002 AG98-203C:ST LK-CRPT CLN 317.90
03/18/2002 MC-CARPET CLEANING SVC 289.00
06/17/2002 AG98-203C:FIRE ST-CRPT C 98.89
06/17/2002 AG98-203C:MC-CRPT CLN S 289.00 994.79
06/05/2002 PKM-GRASS SEEDIWIL-GRO 400.48 400.48
05131/2002 PRCS-WRPA SUMMER SKIL 312.00 312.00
06/05/2002 PKM-WRPA MEMBERSHIP D 10.00 10.00
06/20/2002 PS-POLICE FIREARMS TRAI 75.00 75.00
06/20/2002 AG02-48:PS/JANITORIAL SE 1,575.00
06/20/2002 AGOO-15B: MUN CRT JANITO 660.00
06/20/2002 AGOO-48B: PKM JANITORIAL: 650.00 2,885.00
OS/24/2002 SWMWQ-TESTING SUPPLI 282.10 282.10
06/1012002 MSRM-1ST AID KIT SUPPLIE 65.17 65.17
Sub total for us bank: 622,511.32
Page: 24
apChkLst
06128/2002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 25
253 checks in this report.
622,511.32
Grand Total All Checks:
ìl
~
Page: 25
apChkLst
06/2812002 10:18:36AM
Final Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 26
Bank code: key
Check # Date
~ 06/28/2002
167405 06/28/2002
167406 06/28/2002
1\
~
\
Page: 26
MEETING DATE:
August 20,2002
ITEM#
_=lZ:(Q-J
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
June 2002 Quarterly Financial Report
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
~ CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: June 2002 Quarterly Financial Report
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed and approyed by the Finance Committee
during their July 23rd meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approyal of the June 2002 Quarterly Financial Report."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
--~ ---
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05110/2001
f3
CITY 8F ,....-..
. :. ~~ : EI:I ERFIL
~~ FrY'
MEMORANDUM
Date:
July 18, 2002
To:
Finance, Economic Deyelopment & Regional Affairs Committee
From:
Via:
Tho Kraus, Finance Manager
Dayid Moseley, City Manager
Subject:
June 2002 Quarterly Financial Report
Action Reauested:
Accept the June 2002 Quarterly Financial Report and forward to the August 20th Council meeting for full
Council approval.
ApPROVAL OF C()MMITTEE N::TIOlt;
Co
hair
..
é/
ittee Member
G: cv s-uJ
M~ &i-IGJ
KIHNIMFRIO 1 mtilM IRFFDRMTVR.DOC
.I-I
D-
Prepared 11).
II", Knn;;
Ih"¡,,',¡,¡vt,,,,¡
Oon" (hon
~ ED ERFIL
~Y.RY
"A City fo,. All of Us"
2002
Overview
Highlights
General Government
Revenues
Cash & Debt
Expenditures
Fund Activity Summary
Attachment A
2 -11
12 -14
15 - 17
18
19
June 2002 Monthly Financial Report
~RVIEW
The Monthly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that has taken place in the reporting period.
This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax
Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Debt Service, and
Dumas Bay Center. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial activity through June for the years 1997
through 2002.
Ißf'mLIGHTS
2003/04 Biennial Budget
Departments have submitted baseline budgets, target reductions and new program requests. Finance staff is compiling a
preliminary budget document for City Manger's Review scheduled in August. Council review sessions are scheduled for October.
t'5
Citv of Federal Waf
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort
GOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
General governmental operating revenue collections through June 2002 total $22,321,963, which is $1,807,816 or 8.8% above the
year-to-date budget of $20,514,148. Of this amount, $695,386 is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the
payment of debt services. Attachment A provides a comparison of year-to-date revenues by major sources for 2002 with
comparative figures for the past 5 years.
REYENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REYENUE SOURCES
Period Ending June 30, 2002
. 2002 Reilì"èdBùugèl. AClùals' .. . . Vailanc;, . .. .
. Thrøugh. Throù¡¡h . :Fa\iorabh¡:¡UnfàvorabJ'(
'J"ÍJo . June. . . Pollai.!SI. . """'ÍJq';;r.
Property Taxes 3,752,918 $ 7,724,021 $ 3,954,140 $ 3,954,140 0.0%
Sales Tax 5,133,108 9,901.765 4,883,215 5,279,120 395,905 8.1%
HotellMotel Lodgin9 Tax 68,257 120,000 59,003 47,003 (12,000) -20.3%
Criminal Justice Sales Tax 829,146 793,457 793,457 784,885 (8,572) -1.1%
Intergovernmental 1,628,961 3,200,322 1,349,151 1,451,186 102,035 7.6%
Real Estate Excise Tax 840,553 1,400,000 587,575 1,212,465 624,890 106.4%
Gamblin9 Taxes 1,148,457 1,700,000 849,239 1,100,636 251,397 29.6%
Utility Taxes 3,362,625 6,226,974 3,356,836 3,427,332 70,496 2.1%
Court Revenue 538,977 1,036,164 525,204 459,066 (66,138) -12.6%
Buildin9 Permits/Fees-CD 540,494 1,216,734 623,603 819,274 195,672 31.4%
Expedited Review Fees-CD 53,009 32,358 32,358 nla
ROW Permits/Fees-PW 180,101 263.477 138,300 156,935 18,635 13.5%
Expedited Review Fees-PW 3,336 17,725 3,901 36,726 32,826 841.6%
Licenses 50,904 177,432 82,167 74,394 (7,773) -9.5%
Franchise Fees 280,647 575,935 279,955 324,770 44,816 16.0%
Recreation Fees 320,185 625,264 341,356 344.765 3,409 1.0%
Dumas Bay Centre 293,002 530,800 246.758 229.676 (17,082) -6.9%
Knutzen Family Theatre 36,718 68,860 33,196 35,453 2,257 6.8%
Interest Earnings 525,150 767,232 223,966 223,966 0.0%
dmin I Cash Management Fees 238,153 474,027 237,010 237,010 0.0%
SWM Fees 1,510,877 3,187,834 1,610,432 1,610,432 0.0%
Refuse Collection Fees 75,619 155,308 78.734 106,725 27,990 35.6%
Police Services 382,180 557,357 200,994 317,691 116,697 58.1%
Other 36.737 58,599 55,956 55,956 0.0%
SublolalQ etatl Riovon".. :21';8:ro;1l2: .: 40;:779,287 2Q,51:4;1'48 : 22;321;96'3: . 1;807;816. Uo/.
Other Financin Sources 5,739,885 5,799,546 4.440,635 4,440,635 0.0%
ala I Revon"..:/I. .Othe' Søu<ces S '27;~I;IJ;ØØ7..$" .4M78,83~. . $.. .24,Ø!;4,782 $ 21h762;~Ø7 . .$. . 1;807;81'8. '.7,2".
51500000
46500000
COMPARISON OF 2002 OPERATING REVENUES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL
Total 2002 Budgeted Revenues $40,77Ø,287
41500000
36500000
31500000
26500000
21500000
I
I
I
Nov --~
16500000
11500000
l6500000
1500000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
f'(.,
Citv of Federal Waf
June 2002 Mon/klf Financial Report
Real Estate Excise Tax
Year-to-date Real Estate Excise tax revenue total $1,212,465, which is $624,890 or 106.4% above the budgeted amount of
$587,575. The current month's receipt of $255,814 is also above the monthly estimate of $124,949 by $130,865 or 104.7%.
There were a total of237 real estate transactions, of which 82 were tax exempt and of the remainin~ 151,4 were mobile home
saJes. The largest transactions in June consist of the sale of an apartment complex located On SW 334 Place for $9.6M, an office
building on 336th & Weyerhauser Way for $8.7M, a retail store on 324th & Pacific Highway South for $2.4M, a vacant commercial
building On South 320th for $2.5M, and a shopping center On South 3l4th Street for $I.IM.
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX ACTIVITY
Through June 2002
$1,000,000
.f'
""'~
.."'l'
$2,000,000
$-
"-
!!
31 $/ 8 § ¿ ¡;
~ ~ iifl ?:
'" :l! f'1
'" /i:i
~
C';
Citv of Federal Waf
June 1001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Sales Tax
Sales tax received through June of $5,279, 120 is $395.905 or 8. I % above the year-to-date budget of$4,883,2 1 5. 2002 year-to-date
revenue of $5,279,120 is also higher than June 2001 year-to-date revenue of $5, 133, I 08 by $146,012 or 2.8%. Sales tax received
in the month oOune total $792,402, which is $11,783 or 1,5% above the adopted budget estimate 01'$780,619.
"""'"__"""5"""-'
Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 64.9% of all sales tax collections. Year-to-
date June 2002 retail sales tax collections are $69,]73 or 2.]% higher than June 2001, Miscellaneous retail trade increased
substantially. However, decreases in retail genera] merchandise and retail furniture offset half of the increase.
Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 9.9% of sales tax collcctions is $34,156 or 7.3% above year 2001
activity. We anticipate tax from construction to increase as indicated by the rising number of building pennit applications received
for new construction.
Service indnstries account for 10.7% of the total sales tax collections through June. On a year-to-date basis, service sales tax is up
$47,687 or 9.3% from the year 2001. The majority of the increase is attributable to an infonnation services company reporting
taxable sales of over $4M, compared to taxable sales of up to $800K in previous periods. This one-time increase in sales is the
result of computer equipment installation for one of the city's principal taxpayers. Also. another business service company
increased taxable sales by $2.4M. res lilting in an additional $21 K in taxes for year-to-date June 2002.
WI/Ulcsalc tax which aceoullls for about 5.1~~ uftutal saks tax cullection, i, $58,029 or 17.7~~ bel"" yeil' 2001 aeli,it}. Tlnee
CB
City of Federal Way
June 2002 Monthly Financial Reoort
major computer stores account for 66% of the decline in sales tax due to decreased sales.
SALES TAX ACTIYITY BY SIC CODE
YTD Through June 2002
Sales Tax Activity by Area
% change from previous r -48.0% 6.9% 11.2% -12.9% 1.1% na
Percenta e of total 15.6% 15.8% 16.3% 13.4% 13.1% -1.5%
SeaTac JIIIalb..dß;;;----,,--. ~.98 526;8~3 545,344 547,648 '._491,30113 ,10,2%
% chan efrom revious r 525.6% -0.3% 3.5% -0.5% -10.3% na na
Percenta eoftotal 13.0% 12.2% 11.8% 10.7% 9.3% -1.4% -12.7%
Ma o,-AtJtöÞSåles 178,11M?' '189,621 191517 200¡247- 218j006 17,759 7.6%
% change from previous r -53.7% 6.5% 1.0% -14.7% 8.9% na na
Percenta eoflota! 4.4% 4.4% 4.1% 3.9% 4.1% 0.2% 5.0%
S312th toS'~!I1$I.I!;!!;fj' 18 i4¡¡¡1'57 106,551 256,967 1158.995 2;028 0.8%
% chan e from previous r -56.2% 2.0% 146.9% 7.6% 0.8% na
Percenta e oftotaf 1.0% 1.0% 2.3% 5.0% 4.9% -0.1% -2.2%
P~([Q¡í'G'erítet . 69,688 68,876 83,439 107,649 104,~ ;830 -2.7%
% change from revious yr na -1.2% 21.1% 3.6% -2.6% na na
Percenta e ollota! 1.7% 1.6% 1.8% 2.1% 2.0% -0.1% -5.5%
Hotels &. Mi:ifiiIi m,DÆ!i 18,780 21604 65;O1!!i 42..:709 22,31~ -52.8%
% change from previous r -49.6% -6.2% 15.0% 53.9% -34.3% na na
Percenfage of total 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 1.3% 0.8% -0.5% -55.8%
The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates over 13.1% of the City's sales tax experienced an increase of$7,712
or 1.0% when compared to the year 2001. The increase is due primarily to a major retail building materials store.
SeaTac Mall is showing a decrease of $56,054 or 10.2% when compared to year 2001 activity. On a year-to-date basis for taxes
paid. four major department stores experienced a total decrease of $30K; retail eating & drinking decreased by $6K; taxes from
jewelry sales decreased by $7K; and the remaining decrease is due to an overall decline in SeaTac Mall's taxable sales. On a
monthly basis, tax received in June 2002 is $5K less than June 200 I.
Major Auto Sales have through June collected $218,006, which is $17,759 or 7.6% above the same period in 2001. This is due to
¡neenuve car rebates given by most car dealerships In the later part 01200 I, and that has carried forward to year 2002. Compared
to tl1O prior month, sales to, òecreaseò hy ~'K
e?
Citv of Federal Way
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Hotels & Motels sales tax collected through June total $42,709, which is $22,316 or 52.8% below the same period in 2001.
About 70% of this decrease is due to one hotel that has reported, hut not remitted taxes in 2002. According to the state, we
should be receiving just under $5K for three periods of back taxes next month. The state is working with the hotel 00 payments
ofthe remaining back taxes and will distribute to the City once they receive full payment. Staff will continue monitoring.
SALES TAX BY AREA
YTD through June, 2002
Qth.,
66.5%
SeaTa, Mall
9.3%
S 34eth
13.1%
Major A"tos
4.1%
Gambling Tax
Gambling tax collection of $1,100,636 is $251,397 or 29.6% above the year-to-date budget of $849,239. In comparison to 2001
year-to-date, 2002's tax collection is lower by $47,820 or 4.2%, of which $26K is attributable to a decrease in activity ftom the top
five establishments (one of the five is closed as of April 2002's tax reporting period). Total taxes received by these five
establishments in 2001 and 2002 were $1,049,651 and $1,023,589, respectively. The remaining variance of $21K may be due to
timing of collections, which staff will continue to monitor. June's collection of $154,186 is $9,586 or 6.6% above the monthly
budget estimate of$144,600. The $1.7M total budget for 2002 maybe slightly low when compared to 2001's actuals of$2.2M.
fotal
0.4% $ 4.103
14.9'1 $ 164,082
84.7% $ 932.451
. --.100.0%, $1.100.636 $-
-3.2%
. ".¡..z'l.
Cardrooms
flO
Citv of Federal War
June 1001 Monthlr Financial Report
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax
Hote1lmotel lodging tax collected through June total $47,003, which is $12,000 or 20.3% below the year-to-date budget of
$59,003. The majority of the variance is due to the one hotel not remitting taxes in for part of 2001 and year-to-date 2002. Staff
will continue to follow-up with the state of their collection status. The amount collected represents activity from November 200 I
to April 2002. The month-to-month budget is our best estimate based on two full years of history.
5,885 10,145 8,769
4,578 10,977 9,489
9,165 11,239 9,715
April 7,553 11,226 9,704
May 10,383 13,693 11,837 -28.3%
June 3,751 7,351 10,978 9,489 -5.8%
July 6,190 8,584 10,663 9,217
Au9ust 5,689 12,106 9,933 8,587
September 8,538 15,569 16,071 13,893
October 7,613 15,967 12,644 10,929
November 8,971 13,463 9,607 8,304
December 5,691 16,163 8,871 10,067
YTD June Total 3,751 44,915 68,257 59,003 47,003 (12,000) -20.3%
Utility Tax
Utility tax received through June total $3,427,332, which is $70,496 or 2.4% above the year-to-date budget total of $3,356,836.
The year-to-date June 2002 utility tax receipt is also above the same period in 2001 by $13,265 or 2.8%. Gas taxes exceed the
year-to-date budget of $530,042 by $157,851 or 29.8%. However, electricity is below the year-to-date budget of $1,277,342 by
$160,956 or 12.6%. Cellular taxes also exceed the year-to-date budget total of $376,171 by $166,709 or 44.3%, a growth trend
consistent with prior years. However, year-to-date phone utility tax is below budget by $126,338 or 20.3%.
Ell
Ow of Federal Wav
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Revort
TàJerel1ects"'!XJl1in;¡æti"lyttro..g1May=
State Shared Revenue
State shared revenue collected through June total $2,442,101, and exceeds the budget total of $2,347,382 by $94,719 or 4,0%,
Large variances are seen in liquor profits & excise tax and vehicle licensing fees,
MolorVehlcle Exdse Tax
Camper Exdse Tax
liquorProflisTax .----
Llquae Exdse T"
rim Just Low-Pop/DCD
Crim Jusl Hgh Crime
Equalization
Local Crim Jusl Sales ï'ãx
Fuel Tax
eh Llcli Fees
DUI-Cilies
Local Govi Fin Ass!.
224,981
3,754
242.475
114,776
116,039
61,637
93,244
r-----¡¡¡¡--,>ii'
829.739
302.405
227,900
138,806
36,876
230,204
119,332
36,765
249,063
149,264
-- 38,292
18,859
29,932
1,527
na
251%
42%
-~-
784,885 (8,572)
836,611 3,153
376,827 42,620
7.200 7,200
na
-1.1%
04%
12.8%
na
na
829,146
853,222
366,597
5,560
793:457 I
833.418
334,207
Lz 9§.
.2.-
~
'Rc~ecoo"@""'Y""'cc,co"""'o,';CO' 20011 '""""","op"'I 8,,1901
CI1.-
Citv of Federal Waf
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Report
Building Permits and Plan Check Fees
Building permit revenues collected through June total $819,274, which is above the year-to-date budget by $195,671 or 31.4%.
This does not include year-to-date pass through revenue of $32,358 for expedited and environmental review. Revenue collected
for expedited review is not currently budgeted nor are the offsetting expenses. Building permits, which include mechanical,
plumbing and clear/grade permits currently total $485,849 through the end of June, which is above the year-to-date budget of
$348,109 by $137,740 or 39.6%. Electrical permits total $68,668, which is below the year-to-date budget by $3,766 or 5.2%. Plan
check fees collected through June total $213,969, which is $51,279 or 32% above the adopted budget of $162,690. Significant
permits issued in June include Silverwood residential development and Harry Truman High School.
June
41.1%
91.263 $
82,951 $
117,849 $
110,386 $
98,810 $
122,344 $
112,195 $
114,482 $
124,599 $
89,357 $
76.016 $
76,482 $
$
~~.$
1,215,370
41.2%
944,812
69.3%
14.5~
1e.~'
$': 195,4!7!
- Expendl!u... l.-dude Carmenlty [)eveop<rent !'anl,;s!",",," (071), Plalring (073), and B~I"ng (OO1-52OOD74).
The tahle helow presents a svnopsis ofhtllldJn" roomt acttvttv as of June ,0. 200) tor new construction hetween 2000 and lOill'
9
£13
C;lIIo(Federal War
Building Division - Permit Activity
YTD Through June, 2002
ryø~Ii(Pám;t .
New Residential (Platted)
New Commercial
New Multi-Family Units
New Public
. $~~1<¡1~H'¡~viÇQn$tt~~1iøi)
Manufactured Homes
Residential Alterations
Commercial Alterations
Plumbing Only
Mechanical Only
Misc. Building Permits
"StibfòfåJ-Altétitiion, '. .
Electrical Permits
...t"iaIBuililini!Péi:mm
2000
Yåbie($)
$ 6,912,428
5,107,098
375,510
0
$ 12M5MIi'
0
1,420,890
8,819,877
0
825,811
0
$. 1(06$;57&'
0
2346i;614
N}.
42
9
I
0
$2
0
62
119
31
170
0
382
643
ion. ...s'.
Non-Building Permits:
Sign Permits
,',',"""
204
736,106 132 225,806
"".'.132"""'$'.'.'.'
!totål'Cò¡ßiiJáè;iåì.váìuátioH
(ommeYcialå$a%¡¡fTotal .
. Includes all new, alternatIOn
'1'10;
18
9
3
0
30
0
71
127
48
175
0
.421'
547
998
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Report
2001
Yåb.d$)
$ 2,541,358
22,561,235
873,919
0
$ 2$,n15,$l2
0
2,379,834
12,156,611
0
715,792
0
$ .ls;25'mn
0
.$ 412is,749 .
68
15
I
0
84
0
69
238
40
154
0
',WI.
615
5&5
2002
YøJltc'($)'.,'
$ 13,909,278
34,600,536
0
0
.$ 48,5M,814
0
1,675,254
14,324,321
0
692,878
0
$ .lM92;453
0
$ . 65,202;26:7
126
246,392
lis $i3;926,975. 136$34;717,S46253 . $ 48924,857
.12% . .59% . 14% "S4%43% 15%
ROW Permits and Fees
Overall Public Works pennits and fees collected through June total $156,935, which is $18,635 or 13.5% above the year-to-date
budget of $138,300. Plan review fees collected total $51,878, which is $33,819 or 39.5% below the budget total of$85,697 for the
year-to-date period.
April
May
June
July, --
August
September
October
November
December
. Vliar-"-
,;;.AnnuaHoláL
Monthly Average
30.381
E:/Lj
23.821 $
19,293 $
26.907 $
22,303 $
22,818 $
23,159 $
20,3~,$ .
27,9.'Q.1$.
23,573 ' $
17,039 $
21,865 $
14,469 $
;.!ÎQ" $
21,956
13,078
7.5%
126.4%
-25.5%
0.0%
00%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
""f1J¡j3'~ ":;;:":f~:~%
,;.,.18,63S ',,~," ,1ð05
1,553
na
10
Citv of Federal Waf
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Court Revenue
Court revenue is $115,952 or 25.2% below the year-to-date budget total of $460,059 from fines and forfeitures Total court
revenue collected through June amounts to $4R\.12.1, which is $39,RR 1 or 7.6% below the year-to-date budget of $525,204, and is
also below last year's collections of $538,977 by $53,654 or 10.0%. The base line court revenue is $112,728 or 24.7% below 2001
collections, primarily due to the reduction in traffic and non-parking citations, parking infTactions, and criminal costs. DUI and
other misdemeanors collected through June total $75,544, which is $15,611 or 26.0% above the year-to-date budget of $59,933,
but, however, is in line with 2001 collections. Traffic and Non-Parking are below year-to-date budget of $.102,332 by $108,597 or
35.9%
$36.405 $SO,696 $61,809 $78,577 68,160 -28.1%
37,783 68,750 83.491 70,573 73.481 -22.1%
46373 84,382 84.843 83,707 74,074 84,830 -178%
49,917 57,631 02,673 74,273 77,631 78,295 -73%
52,203 73,420 61,106 75,541 02,169 78,908 -41.1%
J"", 50,138 64,260 72,121 73,046 73,812 76,368 -35.8%
J"~ 52,491 80,666 61,536 71,957 59.666 75,052 0.0%
""goo' 65,123 61,751 71,255 97.179 71,793 84,504 0.0%
Sople- 56,625 72,313 62,059 71,311 67,015 75,962 0.0%
Octa'" 68,176 74,540 58,199 60,635 62,650 7¡361 0.0%
N",,~'" 45,710 56,501 64.346 71,783 62,918 68,955 00%
DocombM 67,590 55,893 58,683 65,100 46,015 68,952 0.0%
'I"d"'" '" CoortR~, -p"",- s.M~, T""" '""'" Adm- Fæ_~æ'" æ ~""'~ from O.""Co"" "'-'h'" Com""'.'. 'CoortR""'" ,"""-
""o"'Coort"""m'_"_~~"~ T""'o""",AdmloFæfood,..""""","Co...a.."",",,.
l""II_~9'Á
(1(/\",,>1 $9'Á
17"",, 14"," - 12æ411 -162%
~ 75,544T------";611 ¡----æc"Æ
-- 25."" 1 - 27,816T "33 1 83%
",=1 ,;,;;:;¡--- l2,,;;r~:;;~'A
."",,1 ?1"" 1 I"""i .f<>""
4$,835 905,87~__- 400,0$ :w4,107 (115.952) ----..:.2i2"^
59717' ~",,' ---- 4sem' 1334ZJ' --'m
~---- ---~--
22925' 40,200' 311451 7,7871 (12>57)' -131:1".
452,897 - -- '5J8,'m 1,036,1M' S25,2o4 ~'í85,JZj----- (:Ð,B81) -7.6%
4:19,670
11
E IS
City of Federal Way
June 2002 Quarterly Financial Reoort
CASH & INVESTMENTS
The following tahle shows the in-house investment activity schedule and their related yielrls and comparison to benchmark. Per
policy, the basis used by the City to detennine whether market yields are being achieved is the range between the average 6 mo.
US Treasury Bill (1.82%) and the State Investment Pool (1.87%). The current in-house yield is 4.37% greater than both
benchmarks.
A enc - FHLB
A enc - FNMA
03/28/2002 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 03/28/2005 4.26%
04/25/2005 $ 1,000,000 $ 999,375 04/25/2005 4.48%
1,016
4.37%
1.82%
$ 58,197,149 1 da 1.87%
35 2.06%
Avera e Maturi
Avera e Yield to Maturi
Avera e Yield - 6 mo. T-Biil
State Investment Pool
Avera e Portfolio Maturi & Yield
The total invested balance at the end of JW1e is $60,196,524, which includes $58,197,149 in the State Investment Pool (SIP). The
SIP is composed of 0.92% Coupon Agency, 27.41% US Treasury, 23.84% Repurchase Agreements, 2.62% Conunercial Deposits,
and 45.21% Discount Notes. The City's total portfolio currently consists of96.7% in the SIP, 3.3% in Agency securities, and 4%
in US Treasury Notes.
SIP Investments by Category
June 30, 2002
Total Investments by Category
June 30, 2002
us Agency
..
Treasury
Securities Repurchase
.~27.41 % A9;;"8~~~ts
Agency
Commercial Coupon
Paper 0.92%
2.62% Discount
Certificates of Notes II
Depo"t 45.21%
I 0.00% I
State
Investment
Pool
9670%
12
15111
Citv of Federal Way
June 2002 Quarterlv Financial Report
DEBT SERVICE
The fonowing is a schedule of outstanding general ohligation debt as of June 30, 2002:
OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT
June 30, 2002
Amount Beg;nning Eodiog
Funding Date of Matwity Orig;nally Out"tmdiog Amount Ou~tandiog
Desenorion Puroose SOUt" ~,ue Oa" In''re,,Ra,, I"ued Debt Red"med Debt
Gene,.! Obligation Band,:
1991 Limited and
1993 Refundiog C'¡eb"IIion P.,k Acquisition REET 13-May-93 01-Oec-21 2.70-5.85 13,480,000 11,765,000 11.7b5.000
1992 COPS Purehase City Hall GF 26-Aug-92 01-Dec-02 3.00- 5.45 2.150.000 285,000 285.000
1993 Limited Develop Sagbalie P"k REET 14-Juo-93 01-Oce-08 2.70-5.70 2,390,000 1,330.000 1.330,000
Trno'Portatioo & Street
1995 Limi"d Improvemeot Proje"s UTTas 28-0ce-95 01-Dee-05 3.90-4.75 5,000,000 2.455,000 2,455,000
Trnn'Portation & Sltect
1996 Limited Improvemeot Projce~ UTTas 29-Feb-96 01-Oce-05 3.50-4.50 2,500,000 1,220,000 1,220,000
Knutzen Theatre, Sport,fi'¡ds,
1997 Limited Downtown PS Facility UTTax 22-Apt-97 01-Dee-12 5.00-5.30 16,150,000 11,290,000 (1.375,000) 9,915,000
Pu"base of Mow" & Dump
1999 COPS Truck-PW Sltect Main!. REET 01-Aug-99 OI-Juo-O4 5.16 184,000 97,423 (18,504) 78,919
Valley Corom (911 o;'Patcb)-
2000 Limi"d Cen'" Bid. & F"ui"ment REET 12-S'"-00 01-Oce-15 5.31 2,551,600 2,455.000 2,455,000
Total GenernJ Obli alioo Debt $ 44,405,600 $ 30,897,423 $ 1,393,504) $ 29,503,919
Public Works Trust Fund Loan:
31-Aug-94,
24-Jul-96 &
PwrL SWM CIP-Kit~ Coro" Project 04-Scp-97 01-Jul-14 1.00 1,555,440 1,121,107 1,121,107
SWM CIP-SeaTac Mall Octeotioo 31-May& 14-
PWTL Pro'e" A" 01-Jul-19 1.00 2,475,000 2,344,737 2.344,737
Subtotal PWTFL 4,030,440 3,465.844 3,465,844
Grnod Total $ 48,436,040 $ 34.363.267 $ 1.393.504) $ 32.969.763
Under RCW 39.36.020(2), the public may vote to approve bond issues for general government in an amount not to exceed 2.5% of
the value of all taxable property within the City. Within the 2.5% limit, the City Council may approve bond issues not to exceed
1.5% of the City's assessed valuation. Prior to the passage of new legislation in 1994, the statutory limit on council manic (non-
voted) debt for general government purposes was 0.75% of assessed valuation. Another 0.75% of council manic debt was
available only for lease-purchase contracts (RCW 35.43.200). These two components have now been combined and can be used
for any municipal purpose, including using the entire 1.5% for bonds. The City's remaining debt capacity within the 2.5% limit is
estimated to be $112,443,748.
Under RCW 39.36.030(4), the public may also vote to approve park facilities and utility bond issues, each of which is also limited
to 2.5% of the City's assessed valuation. A total of7.5% of the City's assessed valuation may be issued in bonds. The remaining
debt capacity within the 7.5% limit is estimated to be $373,103,564. Unlimited tax general obligation debt requires an approving
vote of the people, and any election to validate such general obligation debt must have a voter turnout of at least 40% of those who
voted in the last State general election and of those voting, 60% must be in the affinnative. The following table shows the
availability debt capacity for the City ofFedetal Way-
13
Ell
Citv of Federal War
June 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
General Pumoses Excess Levy Excess Levy Total
Councilmanic Excess Levy Open Space Utility Debt
DESCRIPTION (Limited GO) (Unlimited GO) and Park Pumoses Capacity
AV' $5,213,196,315 (A)
1.50% 78,197,945 $ (78,197,945)
2.50% 130,329,908 130,329,908 130,329,908 $ 390,989,724
Add:
Cash on hand for
debt redemption (B) 11,617,759 11,617,759
Less:
COPs outstanding (363,919) (363,919)
Bonds outstanding (29,140,000) (29,140,000)
REMAINING DEBT CAPACITY 60,311,785 $ 52,131,963 $ 130,329,908 $ 130,329,908 $ 373,103,564
GENERAL CAPACITY (C) $~
(A) Final 2001 Assessed Valuation.
(B) Fund balance as of 6/30/02 of $6,446,053 in debt service prefunding balance and $5,171,706 in utility tax fund.
(C) Combined total for Councilmanic, and Excess Levy capacities.
The Public Works Trust Fund Loans are the obligation of the Surface Water Utility and backed by the rates collected from users
thus not considered as the City's general obligation debts nor are they subject to the limitation of indebtedness calculation.
14
E:.! Ið
Citv of Federal War
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Report
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES
General governmental expenditures through June total $18,126,676 or 42.4% of the annual operating budget of $42,706,248.
Operating expenditures are below the year-to-date budget of$19,616,501 by $1,489,824 or 7.6%.
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT
Period Ending June 30, 2002
City Councii
City Manager
Municipai Court-Operations
Management Services
CivillCriminal Le9al Services
Comm. Development Services
Police Services
Jail Services
Parks and Recreation
Public Works
City Overlay Pr09ram
Snow & Ice Removal
Solid Waste 168,019 379,992
Hotei/MotelLod9in9Tax 10,763 211,187
Surface Water Management 736,189 2,089,846
Debt Service 2,257,212 4,520,792
Dumas Bay Centre 273,527 489,412
Knutzen Fami! Theatre 83,063 176,009
Silbc!()t¡\I:O t<iliiJ:Ex eiJdit¡¡í:<!~', .1:7;343;114;'7 -42;700.248
OtherFinancin Uses' 9,831,358 10,111,560
T()t¡\IExj)ØiJdil¡¡r~:&Olh$rU~s. . . . 27;175;325 . s2;317.&oI1'
rUlher "naneong Uses are those acIMI,es con.,dered one ',me ,n nature.
142,187
325.489
543,062
804,871
570,576
1,395,112
6,559,593
599,850
1,449,941
1,345,818
78,695
235,940
743,082
1,158,229
1,834,304
1,341,328
3,652,942
14,803,526
1,610,844
3,290,109
3,869,227
2,299,478
Ac:lualS '.. . V<iri¡inc:e.
Tþrpllgl1. F~,,¿,i:;ibi~(U¡¡(a¥orill!l~}.
June: . Dollars(S '. Percenl{%
142,959 187,653 (44,694) -31.3%
386,352 345,976 40,376 10.5%
548,997 586,364 (37,367) -6.8%
912,127 821,740 90,387 9.9%
690,722 567.439 123,284 17.8%
1,838,517 1.411,662 426,854 23.2%
7,028,929 6,866,632 162,298 2.3%
656,674 477,689 178,985 27.3%
1,564,333 1.427,857 136.475 8.7%
1,708,143 1,650,220 57,923 3.4%
306,323 187.097 119,225 38.9%
nla
197,349 151,992 45,357 23.0%
105,594 52,785 52,809 nla
1,022,916 858,524 184,392 16.1%
2,215,080 2,215,080 nIa
223,717 247,784 (24,067) -10.8%
67,768 70,182 2.414 -3.6%
19.61&,501 11!.126.67& . . .1.489.s:24:: .7;&%
7,879,864 7,879,864 nla
$27;496.365 $ 26;006;540 1M19;824 . s.4,,/¡
$5,600,000
COMPARISON OF 2002 OPERATING EXPENDITURES. BUDGET TO ACTUAL
Total 2002 Budgeted Expenditures $42,706,248
$40,600,000
$35,600,000
$30,600,000
$25,600,000
$20,600,000
$15,600,000
$10,600,000
$600,000
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dee
---
E:~
I~
Citv of Federal War
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Report
City Council
City Council expenditures total $187,653, which is above the year-to-date budget total of $142,959 by $44,694 or 31.3%. The
variance is due mainly to the timing of annual SCA assessment, A WC services and NLC membership dues that were paid in
January of this year.
Municipal COlirt
Mwlicipal Court Operations expenditures total $586,364, which is above the year-to-date budget of $548,997 by $37,367 or
11.3%. The variance is due mainly to an increase in BI contract expenses when compared to the same period in 2001. However, BI
contract revenue offsets the expenditure increase.
City Manager:
Activity through June total $345,976, and is below the year-to-date budget of $386,352 by $40,376 or 10.5%. Savings can be
found in one-time programs such as Contract lobbyist, City Image and City Newsletter.
CiviVCriminal Legal
Activity through June total $567,439, which is below the year-to-date budget of $690,722 by $123,284 or 17.8%. Savings can be
found in outside legal counsel/litigation specialist cost where only $32K or 36.5% of its $88K annual budget have been expended
year-to-date. The public defense attorney services have also only expended $78K or 30.7% of its $256K annual budget.
Parks and Recreation
Parks Operations expenditures through June total $1,427,857, which is $136,475 or 8.7% below the year-to-date budget of
$1,564,333. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs approved in the carryforward budget adjustment such as
Econnect, Arts Commission, and unscheduled repairs to Klahanee.
Recreation and Cultural Services:
Recreation fees revenue of $ 344,765 is $3,409 or 1.0% above the year-to-date budget of $341,356. Year-to-date recreation and
cultural services revenue of $344,765 is 55.1 % of the total annual budget of $625,264. Recreation expenditures are below the
year-to-date budget of$I,564,333 by $136,475 or 8.7%.
Dumas Bav Centre & Knutzen Theatre:
Dumas Bay Centre operating revenue total of $229,676 is $17,082 or 6.9% below the year-to-date budget of $246,758. Operating
expenditures of$247,784 is above the year-to-date budget of$223,717 by $24,067 or 10.8%.
Knutzen Theatre operating revenue total $35,453, which is $2,257 or 6.8% above the year-to-date budget of $33,196. Total
operating expenditure of$70,182 is $2,414 or 3.6% above the year-to-date budget estimate of$67,768.
Celebration Park:
The following table is a breakdown of Celebration Parks M&O. Year-to-date revenue of$208,182 consists of a $205,880 subsidy
from the Utility Tax Fund, and $2,302 in fees. Maintenance and operations expenditures total $153,818.
Operating Revenue - Concession Fees
Other Sources of Funding - Transfer in From Utility Tax
$
Salaries & Benefits
Supplies
Professional Services
Equipment Rental
Electticity
Water & Sewer
Repairs & Maintenance
Subtotal Other Services &
2,302
205,880
'~~I;;i'!!;
113,241
15,811
2,113
3,373
11,691
667
6,660
Rever¡oeS'Øv
~
¡tore
16
----
---
E- 2-D
City of Federal War
June 2002 Montltlv Financial Reoort
Community Development
Community Development expenditures through June total $1,411,662, which is $426,854 or 23.2% below the year-to-date budget
of $1,838,517. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs as PAA Study, Planned Action SEPA, permit tracking system,
code amendments, and human services contracts.
Public Works
Public Works Operations: Expenditures are below June's year-to-date budget of$I,708,143 by $57,923 or 3.4%. Savings can be
found in various one-time funded programs approved in the mid-biennium and carryforward budget adjustments.
Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are below the year-to-date budget of $197,349 by $45,357 or 23.0%.
Savings are attributable to timing of grant programs.
Surface Water Management Operations: Expenditures are below June's year-to-date budget of$I,022,916 by $164,392 or 16.1%.
Savings can be found in one-time funded programs such as ESA Gap Analysis and Steel Lake Wash Facility.
Public Safety & Jail Services
Police Services have expended $6,866,632 through June, which is below year-to-date estimate budget of $7,028,929 by $162,298
or 2.3%. Savings can be found in various line items, but not specifically to one program.
Jail Services:
Jail Services is below the year-to-date budget of $656,674 by $178,98 or 27.3%. Explanation of the variance includes: May
Okanogan bill (estimated at $5K) is outstanding; January & May Yakima County bill ($5K) is low compared to following months
payments of ($1 OK - $15K); and King County bills are continuing to decline.
King ComIty rates for 2002 incIeased by 6.7% for bookings and 7.6% fot maintenance.
Misdemeanor Bookings $148.78 $139.39 6.7%
Investigative Bookings $14.88 $13.94 6.7%
Misdemeanor Maintenance $76.32 $70.90 7.6%
Investigaltve Maintenance $7.63 $7.09 7.6%
17
---
---
---
--
t:2--1
Citv of Federal War
I
I ,,'.,
General Fund
Street Fund
Ge".r<ill$tre,etl'ùnO':
eblservfeeFunO'"jl)
SpecIal Revenue:
Arterial Street
Utility Tax (1)
Solid Waste & Recyc;;n9
Special Study (Gov, TV)
Hotel/Motel Lod9ing Tax
2% tor the Arts
CDBG
Paths & Trails
sublbl.ISò..¡OfR.v"'ù.Fùnd.,
Capitat Project:
Public Safety Facility
Downtown Revitalization
Unellocated 1997 Bond Proceeds
Celebration Park
Park Improvements
Surface Water Management
Transoortation
S"btòfái¡;<iDitál¡>'òjócfs
Enterprise Funds:
Surface Water Management
Dumas Bay Centre Operalions
Dumas Bay Centre Capital
Knutzen Family Theatre Capital
Knutzen Family Theatre Operations
'Sil1itotOJE.Wþris~FU.d' '
Internal Service Funds: (2)
Risk Management
Information Systems
Mail & Duplication
Fleet & Equipment
Buildin9s & Furnishings
'sùÞtotal tnternal,Servic. ,Funds,
,tnvóSimfMtCObtrolFund
TôtafAlt Funds
June 2002 Monthlv Financial Report
FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY
'..<..'...'.C....,.¡<"""""""""""""""""""."T~"""""',....."...,.",."""""""""",,,
¡{'~j 'c,. 'c,"~
""On";';,."
$,
8,264,468 14,671,536
275,927 1,366,871
,8;540.394 $' ,1$;O38AM, $,
6;,50B;12Z
719,952
6,170,755
199,343
124,882
150,549
28,114
4,140
41,863
,.7;439;597 '
6,552,634
1,303,986
19,959
126,466
577,860
923,236
8,704,116
, 18;208;261
500,811
300,808
76,338
,877,957 '
3,869,727
1,682,758
182,117
1,841,648
1,037,508
8,'613,759
'4,237,;011, $,'
1,311,589
3,461,795
214,088
1,205
48,539
16,955
3,900
. 5058070, ,$ ,
820,385
5,906
6,723
974
542,151
6,267,397
4,449,801
, 12;0~j;:J3r
1,613,380
231,849
52,475
346
136,280
'2.034,330 '
456,559
668,292
95,277
383,543
196,998
1;80t!;670
$,
"'
50,t88,087i$ ,4t,261,824 $,
13,001,605
1,650,221
f4;$51;826 $
'.4,299,080
187,097
4,460,844
151,992
3,372
52,785
29,373
4885;463'
22,658
3,617
210,840
112,464
2,367,308
2,716,886
1,902,533
247,784
55,244
70,182
,2;27S,74Z'
1,669,931
(283,350)
1,388;581, ,$,
(62,069) ,
1,124,491
(999,049)
62,096
(2,167)
(4,246)
(12,418)
3,900
172607
820,385
(16,752)
6,723
(2,642)
331,311
6,154,933
2,082,493
, ~.jt6,4S0
(289,153)
(15,935)
(2,770)
346
66,098
'(241,41o3j
389,444
642,402
111,899
638,220
143,619
""Ul25.58:
""',,' ...' ,,' ,',,',' ",,' ",
.. ",',
30,754,581 $, 10,507,242 $
67,115
25,891
(16,622)
(254,677)
53,380
---
(1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service.
(2) Internal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpose of fixed asset replacement,
with the exception of Risk Management, which is comprised of accumulated reserves for self-insurance and strategic reserve,
e; 2--'1--
----
9,934,398
(7,424)
9;926;915
" ~,4~6,O~~,
1,844,443
5,171,706
261,439
122,715
146,303
28,114
(8,278)
45,763
,,7,6,12,21)4'
7,373,019
1,287,234
26,682
123,B25
909,170
7,O7B,169
10,786,609
27,S$.4;tOr
211,658
(15,935)
298,038
76,6B4
66,098
636;5~4,
3,936,842
1.708,649
165,495
1,586,971
1,090,888
, 61),695,330
IS
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES
OPERATING FUNDS
Through June 2002
199T-ZOOZ
$10,39.,188 $IS,IZa,34Z $17,STa,9.Z $15,.94,095 $ZO,.31,34B $ZZ,770,Z93 $ZZ,a31,T'" $ZZ,a31,T" $ 0.0%
Operating Revenues I
Property Ta,es 3,17B,03T 1 3.324,OB9 3,512,023 3,642,442, 3,T52,91B T,724,021 0.0%
Sales Ta, 4,OT9,1B9 4,303,232 4,631,1B5 5,147,272 I 5,133,10B 9,901,7B5 395,905 B.1%
otel/Mote' Lodging Ta, 4,541 44,914 I 6B,257 120,000 (12,000) -20.3%
rimlnal J""'ce Sale, Ta, 607,717 679,054 663,142 776,640 I B29,14B 793,457 (B'57211 -1.1%
I 1,9B9,049 I 1,949,455 2,029,104 2,067,055 1,B2B,961 1 3,200,322 102,035 T.6%
Real Estate E,d,e Ta, 7B9,477 991,B58 971,771 904,B4B 640,553' 1,400,000 624,B90 10B.4%
Gambling Ta,e, '92,932 141,313 719,439 7BI,090 1,14B,457 1,700,000 251'39TI 29.B%
UtUltyTa,e, 2,154,719 2'512'5TBI 2,T72,245 2,93B,134 I 3,362,B25 I 6,226,974 TO,496 2.1%
Court Reve"'e 272,B19 40T,13B 429,670 452,B9T 53B,977 1,036,164 (BB,136) -12.6%
Building Pem1Its/Fee,-CD 439,55~ 3B2,688 , 733,333 534,793 , 540,494, 1,21B,734 195,BT2 31.4%
E'pod'ed Review Fees-CD 35,2B7 49,309 53,009 ' 32,358 nla
ROW Pe,mIt8lFee,-PW I TO,735 109,90~ I 121,254 15B,543 I 1BO,101 I IB,635 I 13.5%
E'padlted Review Fee,-pW 31,429 15,719 3,33B 32,e26 841.6%
Lioen,e, 39,OB7 28,584 B4,O64 54,581 50,904 (7,773)' -9.5%
F'anehlse Fee, 24B,831 22T,465 23B,989 237,612 280,647 44'8161 1B.0%
Rec",atlon Fee, 241,09T 24B'B25 339,100 27B,909 , 32O,1B5, 3,409 1.0%
Duma, Bay Cent,e Fee,l 164,921 163,9BO 234,646 245"671 293'0021 (17,Oel) -6.9%
Knutzen Famlty The",", 26,7B5 33,773 36,71< 2,257 B.e%
Inte,e" Eamlng, 221 ,DOT 33T,BBB 520,917 51B,B30 525,150 27'99¡ I 0.0%
B1,3BT B2,995 64,240 B5,295 , 238,153 0.0%
1,427,B20 1,57B,363 1,5B3,12B 1,5e5,166 1,510,B77 0.0%
71,926 73,219 62,441 59,942 75,619 26.2%
B9,B51 62,923 176,385 431,7Be 3B2,1<0 11B,697! 58.1%
263,163 734 495 55,4B4 36,517 3B,737 0.0%
'6;&n.06' : .1a;>I&,S90:: "ZO,-;6aO :27"'.,436" .21,130;112: .U%
,
114,B91 11M24 126,a47 119,152 142,1a7 235,940 142'959 1B7,653 (44'B9411 -31.3%
2a9,9B7 295,32a 292,453 229,B60 325,4B9 743,OB2 386,352 345,976 40,37B 10.5%
Municipal Court-Operations 339,256 543,062 1,158,229 54B,997 58B,364 (37,3B7) -6.B%
Management Se"Ioes B98,527 740,121 B3B,212 795,4B9 B04,B71 ',B34'3O41 912,127, e21,740 90,387 9.9%
Civil/Criminal Logal Se,,'ce, B04,4B4 752,580 7BO,2B9 615,133 570,57B I ,341 ,32B B90,722 I 567,439 ~;~:;:1 i 17.B%
Comm. Development Se,,'ce, 1,2<7,22B 1,276,034 1,339,566 1,47B,350 1,395,112 3,B52,942 1,B38,517 1,411,662 23.2%
Police Se"Ice, 4,7B1,2B2 5,452,274 5,B52,97B 6,381,911 B,559,593 14,B03,526 I 7,02B,929 6,B66,632 IB2'29BI 2.3%
Jail Se"Ice, 325,147 344,824 581,320 B91,27B 599,850' 1,B10,B44 , B5B,B74 , 477,BB9 178,9B5 27.3%
Parl<, and Rec",atlon 1,24B,409 1,2B1,570 1,377,573 1,440,B45 1,449,941 3,290,109, 1,564,333 1,427,B57 136,475' B.7%
Public Worl<, 1,401,BB6 1,49B,BOB 1,392,B2B 1,452,219 I 1.345,BIB' 3,B69,227 I 1,70B,143 I 1,B50,22O 57,923 3.4%
City Overtay Pro9,am 113,B34 100'3B21 34,745 1B5,OO41 7B,695 I 2'299'47B 3OB,323 1B7,097 , 119'2251 3B.9%
Solid Wa,te 347,105 113,662 11<,OB9 144,B39 IBB,019 379,992 197,349 151,9921 45,357 23.0%
Hotel/Matel Lod91ng Ta, 17,51B 10,763 211,1B7 ' 105,594 52,7e5 52,B09 50.0%
Suriace Wate, Management 785,372 643,129 I 771,B03, 742,941 736,1B9, 2,OB9,B4B, 1,022,916 B58,524 I 164,392 16.1%
Debt Se,,'ce 717,209 1,037,923 2,264,361 I 2,250,794 2,257,212 4,;~~:;~~ I 2,215,OBO I 2,215,OBO 0.0%
Dumas Bay Cent'e 2O2,7B2 19B,221 229,B77 249,329 273,527 223,717 247,784 -10.B%
Knutzen Famll Theatra 47,B90 B1,51B B3,O63 ' 176,009 67,768 70,1B2 -3.B%
Tatal 0 eratln Ex ndnu'es 12,895,683 13,853,2T9 18,0",631 17,195,435 1T,343,967 42,70B,2'" 19,818,501 18,128,8T8 7.8%
Operating Revenues om/(unde,)
0 eralln Ex endnu'e, I 3,T03,39B 4,"8,311 38T,4%
Oil"" F;nanclng Sau«es 0.0%
Othe, FInancing Uses 0.0%
Ending F"nd Balance I 299,B42 I 196,303 i 1
S"'dWa,te 294,316 ~: 1 nla
Snow 5 Ice 103,530 :1~:~~~ 1 95,575 nla
Arterial Straet 477,3T5 45B,790 nla, nla
UtllityTa' 2,120,030 2,B30,14B 4,944,684 8,160,052 nla i nla
SWM 1,5b6,522 2,276,459 1,643,113 I <12,213 I 411,901 nla, nla
Path5T",II, 6,153, 12,555 22,353 I 31,474 I 50,848 nla nla
St""oglc Re,e"e 2,022,389 I 2,025,49B 2,028,W4 2,033,B32 ' nla nla
Debt Se,,'ce 2,9B6,e05, 5,2e3,4e2 5,74B,50B 4,561,433 6,505,B79 4,613,267 -I 6,4:~:~~; I nla 1 nla
D"ma, Bay Centra B3,742 1 13,2BB 47,775 35,745 63,775 40,239 nla' nla
P"'ce 1,082,W7 786,441 74B,150 BOO,229 ! 604,131 669,334 400,424' nla nla
P3 300,000 i 300,000 I 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 , nla I nla
Inte,,"nd Loan, 10,000 10,000 I 10,0001 10,0001 10,000 10,000 10,000 ' nla nla
Un'e,e"ed 5,61B,643 3,532,267, 4,009,345' 7,343,942 B,023,716 2,050.217 B,746,19B nla nla
TotaJEi'dlriFurid8àiarice '$145IT712 $1723523T $IB136B69 $21 622220 ' $21226020 $'9 "'81 '$23587841 $ 329T84., nta
"n8!2002l144AM
t;:2-J
\'1
7117t02
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SWM DIVISION
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Paul Buclch, Surface Water Division Manager
The Professional Services
Agreement has been executed
I I 10/02 I 12102 I 6/02 I I recently. CH2M Hill, the eonsultant
W. Hylebos Channel 6/02 I I firm for this project is proceeding 747,868 I
Stabilization Design 12103 6/02 6/03 12/03 with design. Based on 2001 CIP gap I 217,113
analysis, the revised estimated
projecteost is $1,176,300 (2001
dollar).
This project is funded for design,
right of way acquisition, and
I I I I I I I construction. Preliminary design
SW 356th Street Drainage I I was completed in march 1999.
Study/SW356th St Closed 1/99 9/01 1/99 N/A 8/01 6/01 TBD N/A ~~,,"eartyre~i~~~s~~~p:~ti~~d~~teW~ I 623.535 I 279,694
Depression Acquisition land Acquisition
12/02. Property acquisition issues
eontinue to delay the project.
Condemnation has been initiated on
5 properties.
The project has been accepted by
City Council on 2/19/2002. Thelas!
payment of $98,146.53 to the
contractor, Katspan, will be paid into
I I 14/00 I I I the Court due to claims from the
(t\ I SeaTac Mall Basin Drainage I 10/96 I 6/01 I Dept. of Revenue. A portion of
Improvements Phase II Design ConstruC\ilon Phase N/A 9/97 4/00 6/00 N/A Public Works Trust Fund loan I 3,071,630 I 3,067,665
~ (Design/ROW/Construction) money in the amount of $614,582.51
has been returned back to the State
in order to meet 30% of local
contribution requirement for 1% loan
rate.
Lakota Creek Restoration
(two projects to be combined
into one)
~
('-'
V'
Annual Programs
Minor CIP/Maior Maintenance
Gravel removal from Hylebos
Creek at South 373" Street
bridge;
Lake Loren, Lake Jeane, and
Easter Lake HSPF modeling;
Mirror Lake/Fisher's Bog
modified outlet analysis;
Other major maintenance
projects
RIO Retrofit
6-9ponds
Lake and Stream
Steel Lake noxious weeds
removal in Spring/Summer
2002
Wat~" Qualitv
364 Street Culvert
replacement;
Storm Drainage Hot Tape
Stencil;
Creek and pond temperature
monitoring prO9ram;
Catch basin insert
evaluations
K,ICIPlswmO71702.doc
7/02
12103
1/01
12/01
7/02
10102
N/A
N/A
12/02
N/A
7102
6103
NIA
N/A
12103
NIA
Montgome¡y Water Group has been
selected as the design firm for the
project. The professional Services
A9reement has been executed by
the firm and the City is anticipated
to execute the agreement and issue
Notice to Proceed shortly, Based on
2001 CIP gap analysis, the revised
estimated project costs are
$1,306,800 for west branch Lakota
Creek and $734,250 for main stem
Lakota Creek (both are in 2001
dollar),
The annual programs are used to
correct deficiencies posing hazards
in major conveyance systems, solve
minor localized fiooding problems
improving water quality and habitat,
reduce the liabmty aspects of
publicly owned RID facilities, and
restore lost functions and values of
City's many streams and lakes,
Each year a list of projects is
developed for each of the following
programs:
Minor CIPIMajor
Maintenance
- RID Retrofit
- Lake & Steam
WQ Improvement
Projects
364" Street Culvert Replacement
project is postponed to 2002.
1,779,197
351,149
224,767
Total
296,963
80,277
...
z ...
W I>:
:EZO
I;¡olh
":""1>:
"'!!III)
:!:ï:=~
II)c!;t
~ulii
~tï:ti
~~w
~"'8
<0 I>:
~ '"
'"
15
@¡:j
E~
~ .,
£ti
"a,
ùii.
.s~
U
~~
H
"0
15.;
~iil
,,8
F~
N
0
:g
~
m
w
¡;j
~
'"
~
'"
~
N
~
'"
~
-¡;~
~~
:;:<:
~tj
1i
VI",
iË"
~~~
'"
m
g
~
'"
m
g
gê
00>
g~
0
g
'"
!
"0"0" - .
~wO"O'"
:r~~~
5-g;e ~:
>-:': ~ 0 ¡¡
ihii
3 :5:ê8
~u"5ow
~."'U-"
:ë~HE
~ ~~~2
'g~~H
'0 5?'~ 5?"
Q::;:Q:;:~
'"
0
...
~
0
m
0
m
0
on
~
0
on
>-
:;;~
~ ';;~~
~~ ~~¡¡
~~ v;:::~
~~ t.l;e
U~H
~
"oS!
~~
~ ~
.~~
~ð
g ~ê;
~~~
~
0
0
0
E
>-vc
ðl[
>-E"O
-"ow
u,;;
~.~ ~
~ °
..=~~
O>~
~~~
~ ~8
ro"O
'g~~
'0-'; ~
Q:Q:<:
'"
0
<:
Z
N
0
N
""
z
0
N
0
~
0
Õ:>
rom
';;~
w-
"on
v; on
0 w
~~
on.;{
~
-g,g
~ ~
~~
.~~
'" ~
~ 0
Ole,
¡[LV
~
~~
~¡¡;
v; VI
0 w
~~
~.;{
0
.,
0
0
0
0
w
.,
i
0.;
1;~
~~
3:5
~ .~
~:Ji
:ë~
.~ g'
~':i:
~'ð
ê'g'
o.z
M
0
""
z
0
~
<:
Z
0
on
M
0
'"
0
~
" .~
~~
~ ~
~ ~
N;
'" ~
~ 0
Ole,
0
.,
g
~-
N
.,
"'~ >-0
S~~;~
wUOE
00. 0> E E
g~~~";;
~ g'2 . ~
"" o>;:i E
2.: w 8
~ g,;¡; g <:
~w:;: on
- Z ~w
u 0 "
itHi
" ~ 0'" w
o.~u-"O
M
0
<:
Z
0
~
<:
Z
0
on
M
0
'"
0
j:;
:~
~3:
v; on
0 w
~~
M w
on.;{
~
"0
~"
~ ~
~ ~
.~t;
~ð
I
'?:
I-
¡:¡ :;:
~z~
0:0,,",
«-0:
~~~
~~~
g¡~~
;:0:'-'
!,1t;;a
..J 0:
g¡ 0.
0.
3
~
05
3
ò
~
05
,¿
:5.
28
~~
U
t= ."
H
È~
i" 8
ê¡¡
n
~OJ
H
~.:J
i"~
Õ
ia
§
~
§
~
N
§
§
.9
1;; ID
~~~i
j¡':;~"
~p~
~~~.g
ue¡ij1;>
g¡~j¡~
1!
~oiî:
~~~
"eO;
."1;;«
~8~
}ê
0.2
~~
~Æ
~ ê
'" ,,2
N MÜ
~- .@Ê
ei"
8
0
'"
~
'"
:¡
0 -uo
'.:¡ ,¡;
. 'iSg
§ ~n
i H!~
8 § j¡ ~ .
.- fj - E '"
~';:~¿
ðJ li~fg
~~n~
.~~~~~~
.1:¡[~ ~';; E
if~i~i
'"
z
'"
z
~
'"
z
~
N
§
'"
S
0
~
,¡;"'~
~~~
~~~
;5£§
¡ijA ~
H~
0
:::
~
:::
0
:::
~
:::
~;
0 °
n
g 8
H
H
sa¡
ou
§j .
Hi
t=:s1S
~
~
'"
~
~
'"
~
~
~
}ê
00
~~
~Æ
0
g
~
.;
~
i
@
e
0
0
0
~
::f
l' Jê; OJ
i;;i
. .
H.~~
ou.¡;:¡¡
!Hi
mil
~
§
§
~
'"
z
§
0
~
~~ ~~
~ s~ ~ :~ ~ ~
"0 5i '" "0 g: 5i '" "0 &
~~ J!j¡ ~~~>--_J!j¡ ~~~>---
.,,;~ ~~~,,;~~~~~,,;~~
~8 5i~§?~8~5i~§?~8~
~¿?
'"
~
00
§
Iii
. c
- a
~~
, E
§ 8
o~
~K
¿-¡j
U
§~
~.s
H~
ü-g~
Hi
é'S"
~
~
~
'"
Z
§
§
§
~
~~
~t
~a ~c
~E£ ~ß
:¡;:;<õ ¿ 2
~j~ n
0
N
'"
'"
:;
Ñ
~
as
;;
Ñ
.- a
H
H
H
é'~
g:¡¡
H
~~
H~
H~
~:g "'
Æ~~
N
~
'"
Z
N
0
~
~
§
~
~ 0
l R
~ ~
;f' .
8 .~
N "
§
~
~
a
"'
u
"'
õ~
%"
~B
U
0
0
0
~
M
'0
e
'"
'"
'"
as
¡g
Ñ
u~
c~
1;B§
~I
8;i
:s~~
-';;:¡¡
I~~
:g~
"',
~¿~
õ'ßá
~21'
Æ~~
~
N
0
~
~
õ
S
"
0
.
$0
~,g¡;¡
. ~;g
~~."
~8E
g
0
~g
~~
"0
E'2}ò
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2002
ITEM#
-=rz= Ç( \
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: Federal Way Public Schools 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan/School Impact Fee
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
X CONSENT RESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $
ORDINANCE - STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $
BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $
HEARING STUDY SESSION
FYI OTHER
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report to July 15 Land Use Transportation Committee.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
The City has receiyed the Federal Way School District's 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan with the proposed school
impact fees for the City's annual review and adoption.
The new fees, if approyed, will be effective January I, 2003, are $3,894 per single-family unit and $1,094 per multi-
family dwelling unit. This is a $1,278 or 49% increase from the $2,616 single-family rate, and $198 or 22%
increase from the $896 multi-family rate.
While the proposed fees are substantially higher than what we currently have, they are still below that of Auburn
and Kent school districts.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommends forward the proposed
School Impact fee of $3,894 per single family deyelopment and $1,094 per multi-family deyelopment effectiye
January I, 2003 to August 20th council meeting consent agenda for approval.
PROPOSED MOTION: I moye approval of the proposed School Impact Fee of $3,894 per single family dwelling
unit and $1,094 per multi-family dwelling unit effective January I, 2003
~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
_T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
CCCOYER.5124194
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
July 10, 2002
Federal Way City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee
Via:
Dayid H. Moseley, City Manager
Iwen Wang, Management Services Director
From:
Subject:
Federal Way Public Schools 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan/School Impact Fee
The City has received the Federal Way School District's 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan with the
proposed school impact fees for the City's annual review and adoption.
The new fees, ifapproyed, will be effectiye January 1,2003, are $3,894 per single-family unit and $1,094
per multi-family dwelling unit. This is a $1,278 or 49% increase ftom the $2,616 single-family rate, and
$198 or 22% increase ftom the $896 multi-family rate.
A number of yariables go into the school impact fee calculation. Among them are the District's facility
needs, construction costs required for schools, and the student generating factor (ayerage students per
household in elementary, middle, and high schools respectively) in new single and multi-family
deyelopments, The calculated amounts are then reduced by any state matching funds and voter approyed
property taxes for construction. Finally, a 50% factor is applied to eliminate imperfections in the fee
calculation model.
The higher fees are caused primarily by a 7% overall increase in the student generating factor (from an
ayerage of 0.62 students per household to 0.66 students). More important is the substantial increase in
middle (24%) and high school (45%) student counts. Because the District's capital requirements are
concentrated at the middle and high schoolleyels, the increased student count amongst these two leyels
led to a substantial increase in calculated fees. The 18% decrease in elementary school student count
levels did not generate any offsetting savings.
While the proposed fees are substantially higher than what we currently haye, they are still among the
lowest in King County.
Attachments:
Federal Way School District 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan (the new impact fee calculation is on page
26).
Committee Recommendation:
Forward the draft Federal Way School District 2002/2003 Capital Facilities Plan and proposed impact fee
to full Council for approyal with implementation of the proposed fee of $3,894,fer single family - 'ð
deyelopment and $1,094 per multi-famiIy development effective January I, 2003.~ \III\~1ltJ tv Ó('W !:.i1/i)tít.-j
~t;ÞJ- ~ .
, .'
.' .,'
Hí ró~ rn r::J ç"
'¡') U', L,j. Ij "
- ¡"'I ,- if i I
Federal Way SchoolDistrict No. 210
2002/03
Capital Facilities Plan
.
~,
Building for the 21st Century
m
We
'.'
Mission
Federal Way Public Schools is obligated to
educate all students in academic knowledge,
skills, abilities and responsible behavior to
be successful, contribuling members of a
free society.
Vision: Every Student a Reader
* All 3'd graders reading at grade level by 2004
* AUld" graders reading at grade level by 2006.
* *90% of ALL students reading al grade level by 2009
Federal Way Public Schools
3/405 /8"'AvelllleS
Federal Way, Washington 98003-5433
(253) 945-2000
This document is published by the
Business Services Department of the
Federal Way Public Schools.
June 2002
Federal Way
Public Schools
Every Srudent, a Reader
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2002/03
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BOARD OF EDUCA nON
Ed Barney
Charles Hoff
Bob Millen
Don Putman
Earl VanDorien
SUPERINTENDENT
Thomas R. Murphy
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION I
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
SECTION 4
TABLE OF ÇONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
THE CAPITAL FACILITÅ’S PLAN
Introduction
Inyentory of Educational Facilities
Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities
Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities
Needs Forecast - New Facilities
Six Year Finance Plan
MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Introduction
Map - Elementary Boundaries
Map - Junior High Boundaries
Map - Senior High Boundaries
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction
Building Capacities
Portable Locations
Student Forecast
Capacity Summaries
King County Impact Fee Calculations
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2001/02 PLAN
ii
ii
iii-v
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12-13
14-15
16-18
19-23
24-26
27-29
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act
(SHB 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances
of King County Code 2lA, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effectiye
December 21, 1995 as amended, and the City of Kent Ordinance No. 3260 effective
March 1996, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan
as of June 2002.
This Plan has been adopted by King County, the City of Kent and the City of Federal Way
and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This
plan is .also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensiye Plans of each
jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee
ordinance. .
The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within
which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council
adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line
Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal
Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King
County will encourage and actively support the deyelopment of Urban Centers to meet the
region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. This Plan's estimated
population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which
requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not
intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare
interim plans consistent with Board policies- Additional plans will be consistent with the
six year Capital Facilities Plan.
iii
FEDERAL WAY PUßLICSCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
~.
,
~
~,
INTRODUCTION (continued)
On October 12, 1998 the Federal Way School District Board of Education approyed a
recommendation to moye to a Pre K-5 elementary, 6-8 middle school, and 9-12 high
school grade configuration beginning in the fall of 2003 or as additional high school space
allows. This grade configuration is belieyed to be more responsive to student needs. It
will allow for smaller elementary enrollments with room for lower primary class sizes.
The middle school will provide more deyelopmentally appropriate instruction and a better
academic transition between elementary school and high school. Middle schools will also
allow two-year preparation for the W A State 7th grade test, and matches most western
Washington Districts. With State and District standards becoming eyen tougher, 9th grade
students need to be brought into the high school environment and giyen access to high
school subject specialist. The four-year high school plan combines the 9-12 graduation
credit system, allows two-year preparation for the W A State loth grade test, and physically
places the high school students together.
Federal Way Public Schools must meet the needs of a growing student and community
population. The District must be flexible with building, programs and staffing to meet the
needs of the 21st Century, while being financially responsible and sensitive to the current
tax rates. A flexible, cost effective and educationally beneficial approach that integrates
academics and high tech/high skill preparation is needed. By extending the existing debt
and creatively using new and existing facilities, the District can meet these complex needs
with no increase, on average, in local tax rates.
Federal Way citizens approved a bond proposal of $83 million in September 1999. This
bond will proYide for a comprehensive high school ($44 million); a middle school ($17
million); expansion and improvement of existing schools ($9 million); replacement of
Truman High School ($6 million) and other general improvements ($7 million).
Additional planned improvements included in the bond proposal are: parking and
pedestrian safety, playgrounds and sports fields, new classroom start-up and music
equipment, information systems and networks and emergency communications.
Planned opening for the new high school is September 2003. No Board decision has been
made on the opening configuration of the new high school. There is currently a
recommendation before the Board to open the new high school with grades 9 and 10
mandatory and grades II and 12 opt in. This recommendation would allow 11th and 12th
grade students in 2003 to finish high school in their current building. This
recommendation has substantial capacity impacts on the three existing high schools for
two years. There is a study in progress to determine the feasibility of this
recommendation. Truman High School will open in February of 2003.
A Middle School Transition Team began meeting in May 2001 to develop
recommendations for the middle school programs. These recommendations were adopted
by the Board of Education on March 25, 2002. It is anticipated that thc adopted programs
will havc facility impacts. In the coming months, middle school principals will present
school models to implement these changes. A similar process is underway with the high
schools. Facility needs will be evaluated over the next few months and any changes to
the capacity will be noted in the District's 2003/04 Capital Facilities Plan.
iv
FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Federal Way Public Schools opened the Internet Academy in the 1996/97 school year.
This program currently serves approximately 617 students. 114 are students also seryed in
other Federal Way School District buildings. Internet Academy has grown from about 60
students to the current 617 in six years. The forecast for this school is based on current
average annual enrollment. Historical growth has not been a reliable tool to forecast this
enrollment.
Internet Academy is currently operating out of leased space consisting of administratiye
areas and a computer lab area. This capacity is not included in the analysis of instructional
spaces. The facility needs are unique to a program of "distance learners".
Federal Way Public Academy opened in the 1999/00 school year in six portables on the
Illahee Junior High site. Two additional portables were added for opening the 2000/01
school year to expand the program to include ninth grade students- The school served 180
seyenth, eight and ninth grade students this year and will serve 180 - 210 students in
grades seven, eight and nine in the 2002103 school year. The District is currently
negotiating the purchase of a building for the Federal Way Public Academy. The
anticipated moye to this building is in February 2003.
v
\
,;;
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 1, THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered
to determine the facilities ayailable and needed to meet the needs of a growing
community.
This section proYides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and
expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. This is followed by
a Financial Plan which shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and
modernization listed-
1
FEDERAL WAY PUBLlCSCHOOLS2002l03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Adelaide 1635 SW 304th Street Federal Way 98023
Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th Street Federal Way 98023
Camelot 4041 S 298th Street Auburn 98001
Enterprise 35101 5th Ayenue SW Federal Way 98023
Green Gables 32607 47th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023
Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th Street Auburn 98001
Lake Groye 303 SW 308th Street Federal Way 98023
Lakeland 35675 32nd Ayenue S Auburn 98001
Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Road Federal Way 98003
Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th Street Auburn 98001
Mirror Lake 625 S 3l4th Street Federal Way 98003
Nautilus 1000 S 289th Street Federal Way 98003
Olympic View 2626 SW 327th Street Federal Way 98023
Panther Lake 34424 1st Avenue S Federal Way 98003
Rainier View 3015 S 368th Street Federal Way 98003
Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ayenue SW Federal Way 98023
Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Place Federal Way 98023
Star Lake 4014 S 270th Street Kent 98032
Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ayenue S Kent 98032
Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023
Valhalla 27847 42nd Avenue S Auburn 98001
Wildwood 2405 S 300th Street Federal Way 98003
Woodmont 26454 16th Ayenue S. Des Moines 98198
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Federal Way Public Academy 36001 IS! Ave S Federal Way 98003
Illahee 36001 1st Ayenue S Federal Way 98003
Kilo 4400 S 308th Street Auburn 98001
Lakota 1415SW314thStreet Federal Way 98023
Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Road Federal Way 98003
Saghalie 33914 19th Avenue SW Federal Way 98023
Totem 26630 40th Avenue S Kent 98032
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Decatur 2800 SW 320th Street Federal Way 98023
Federal Way 30611 16th Avenue S Federal Way 98003
Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th Street Auburn 98001
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
Merit School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003
Harry S Truman High School 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003
LEASED SPACE
Internet Academy 32020 IS! Ave S Federal Way 98003
2
',"~
¡
r,.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Developed Property
Administrative Building 31405 18th Avenue S Federal Way 98003
MOT Site 1066 S 320th Street Federal Way 98003
Central Kitchen 1344 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003
Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th Street Federal Way 98003
Leased Space
Community Resource Center 1928 S Sea Tac Mall Federal Way 98003
ECEAP Offices 308l914th AyeS Federal Way 98003
Undeveloped Property
Site #
Location
23
35
40
63
71
72
82
84
85
96
SW 360th Street & 3rd Ayenue SW
S 35lst Street & 52nd Ayenue S
E of 10th Ayenue SW Between SW 334th & SW 335th Streets
E of 47th Avenue SW & SW 3l4th Place
S 344th Street & 46th A yenue S
36600 block of Pacific Highway S
1st Way Sand S 342nd St
3737 S 360th St
16th Aye Sand S 364th Way
S 308th St and 14th Aye S
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements.
Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the
District.
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - E~ISTING FACILITIES
EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
FUNDS
Truman High School Replacement with expansion. Anticipated source of funds is
currently authorized bond
issues
Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is
Portables Impact Fees.
Decatur High School, Federal Expansion Anticipated source of funds is
Way High School and currently authorized bond
Thomas Jefferson High issues.
School
Various School Sites Parking Safety; Network Anticipated source of funds is
Upgrades; Automated future bond issues.
Libraries;
Elementary Playgrounds; High
School Sports Fields;
Emergency Communications.
4
. "
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE
OF FUNDS
New High School Site 85 Anticipated source of
funds is currently
authorized bound issues
and state matching funds.
Federal Way Public Academy 34620 9th Ave S, Anticipated source of
Federal Way, W A funds is state matching
funds, Impact Fees, future
bond issues and/or non-
voted debt issues.
Additional Secondary Capacity Unknown Anticipated source of
funds is state matching
funds, Impact Fees, future
bond issues and/or non-
voted debt issues,
5
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Six Year Finance Plan
Secured Funding
Sources 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total Rcvcnu
[mnact Fees (I) $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $[90,831 $[,065,831
Land Sale Funds (2) $844,026 5844,026
Bond Funds (3) $16,281,692 516,28[,692
TOTAL $16,456,692 $175,000 $175,000 $1,019,026 $175,000 $190,831 $18,191,549
Unsecured Fundine Sources
State Match Funds (5) $15,200,OOC
Bond or Levv Funds (3) $50,585,OOC
Land Fund Sales (6)
[mnactFees(4) $[,5oo,OOC
TOTAL $67,285000
NEW SCHOOLS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Tota[ Cost
New Seconda'" Canacitv (9) $26,250 $233,046 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $9,[40,000 $1,000,704 515,400,001
New 5enior Hi.h School ([2) $2[,610,000 $18,017,263 539,627,263
New Senior Hich School Site (10) 5(
New Seconda'" Canacit Site (ll) $1,600,000 51,6oo,OOC
Federa! Wav Public Academv $3,000,000 $[,000,000 54,000,00(
MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION
ruman Senior Hiah (Alternative) 53,820,000 $2.134,718 55,954.718
Exnansion Three Hi.h Schools $6,029,269 56,029.269
Expansion E[ementary Schools $200,000 $[,500,000 $300,000 52.000,()()(
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
Portables (7) $158,000 5158,OOC
OTHER
School [mnmvementS /8) $267,919 $726,000 $4,852 5998,77 [
Facilities Denartment $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 5250,000 5250,000 51.5oo,()()(
TOTAL $35,361,438 $25.461,027 $2,554,852 $3,250,000 $9,390,000 $1,250,704 $77,268,021
I<OTES.
1. These fees...e cmrently being held in a King CoUnlY, City of Fede"'! Way and City af Kent impact fee account, aDd will be
available for use by the District for system improvements.
2. These funds come from various sales af land and are set aside for estimated expenditu=.
3. These funds wilt be used for future projects.
4. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District over the next si, Y""'"
5. These funds...e projected state matching funds.
6. These funds ace proj",ed bnd sale income.
7. These fees repre"nt the cost of moving and siting existing portables and purelusing new portables. The District may choose to purehase new
portables in the ycars shown. This estimate may also include the cost of purehasing these portables.
8. Those pmj"'s have been approved by the Bwd of Directors and cove< most "hools. "rese projects do not increase capacity.
These pmjeClS include school netwo,ks, in[onTIation and library systems; new classroom stan up; elem,"",y pbygmunds and liigli school sport> r.dds;
music equipment emergency communkation.
9. Ncw m,"dMyu¡=i.y i,",c middle Khool eompo"c"t ,f.lic bornt Thi, i,"row" " middle schoot i" n" imp~. roe "le,l"ioo
Thc Dirui"i,reK=hi""mall KI~I"'",ioo"n.atwill¡""ea"'eap"i,yroc"udc,,"i,,ll" K<OO"'",yg"n"
10 SI" p,~h"c foc",' high "hool ,fS).2 M w"complc" i"n" 2000eal<"d~ ,,~,
I,. Si" prod."c foc"" mlddl< Khoolh"w "co"d~yeap~l.y, ,i" oc ,i", to "'d"w"i,,'"
12. Tooalc"",di"",n.""hn" 12l3tnOOOfocn"S",ioclli,hSehool i,S 4,872,7371.
6
.>.
.~.,
FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
i;
~J
SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Federal Way Public Schools (the District) has twenty-three elementary schools (grades ¡(-6),
seven junior high schools (grades 7-9), three senior high schools (grades 10-12) and two
alternati ye schools (grades 7-12) for the 2001/02 school year. The Internet Academy seryes
grades K-12. On April 20, 1996, the Federal Way Public Schools Board of Education adopted
the boundaries for these schools. In May 1999, minor adjustments to elementary boundaries
were adopted- The following maps show the seryice area boundaries for each school for each
grade level (Harry S. Truman High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal Way
Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are
reyiewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs which affect
school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. A Boundary Committee has
been meeting since January 2002 to deYelop recommended Senior High and Middle School
boundaries for 2003. A Board decision on this recommendation is anticipated at the June 25"\
2002 Board meeting. Elementary Boundaries will be studied in the 2002/03 school year.
The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility
infrastructure is in place to handle new housing deyelopments. In the case of most public
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that
deyelopment. School Districts are different. If the District does not haye permanent facilities
available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can
be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is
recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools.
Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
It is important to realize that a single housing deyelopment does not require the construction of a
complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district
and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single
deyelopment.
7
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BOUNDARIES
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Codo...
" Adelolde C-6
"Brigodoon B-8
28 Comelot G-5
12 Ente",ri.. D-'
" G~n Gobi.. A-7
30 Lake Dolloff G-6
11 LakeG,o" D-6
3J Laketond f-'
2 Mo'" Twoin f-<
29 Me~dl'" Hill H-5
. MI~,Lake E-6
, H.uti!"' E-5
15 OlymploView C-7
21 Pon"'" Lake E-8
37 Roini" View f-1O
" She~~d fo~st D-8
"SiI",Lak. D-7
26 St"Lake G-3
"Sunnyo~st G-2
13 Twin Lek.. e-6
27 Volhollo G-<
7 Wildwood f-5
1 Woodmont f-3
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Codo...
.. "'ohee
" Kilo
62 tokoto
61 S",¡ow..
70 Sogho"e
65 Totem
8 Merit
E-'
G-6
D-6
E-5
C-8
G-3
,-6
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Codo...
60 Dm,", C-6
61 'edml Woy E-5
83 Thom" Jeffe~on G-<
8 Ho""S.Trumoo F-6
8 Merit ,-6
Futu~ Sohool Siteo --
Su,!,lus Siteo
100 Edu"Uono' S"vi" Conte'
" futu~ Support Se""'"
97 M"n"",n"-<>".~Uono-T~n,,o"'Uon
s
---~
.-,-
~.-._--
:'..,.:."..:..' [bv
FEDERAL! /
WAY~
"'u.._s~,......,
~ 10
"...,.""""""
(253) 945-2000
,-....,.-.-
8
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
.'
Junior High School Boundaries
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
elEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Cod. -- .
10 Ad.I,ld. c~
16 Bng,doon B"
28 C,m.lot G.,
12 Ent"Pn.. D-'
14 G".n G,bl.. A-7
30 uk. 00110' G~
11 uk. G"", D~
33 uk.I'nd F.'
, M"" 7w,in F-4
29 M...d'thH'" H-'
'Mi~,uk. E~
, ",,'tilu. E-'
15 Olympl'Vi.w C-7
21 P,nth" uk. E"
" R.ln'" Vi.w F-1O
41 Sh.<wood Fo.." D"
"sn",uk. D.7
26 St"uk. G-'
25 Sunny'.." G-'
" Twl" uk.. B~
27 V,I",II, G"
7 wndwood F.5
.1 Woodmont F-'
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Cod. -- .
64 "',h..
" Kno
62 uko...
61 S",¡,w.,
70 S'gh,ne
" Totem
8 Ment
E.'
G~
D~
E-'
C..
G-J
F~
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Code -- .
80 o.,"u, c~
81- Fede~IW,y E-'
" Thom.. Je'."on G-4
8 H,""S_TNm'n F~
8 Ment F~
Futu" S,hool SH.. -
Su'Plu. SH..
100 Edu"tio~1 S.NI" Conte'
" Futu.. Support SeN;'"
97 M,ln..n'nce-ope~tion..T~n.po""on
s
,~". n~- ~
,-,~-~-
:.-«:"'.-:" , @V
FEDERf\LI ,/
WAY~
,...-...-.~"...,.,
"...,..' ",,",,"
(253) 945-2000
'-"'."W'-
9
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
Senior High School Boundaries
H
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 210
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Cod. -- .
10 Ad,lold, C-<i
16 Brigodoon B-<i
" Com.'ot G-S
., En..",ri.. D.'
" G...n Gobi" A-7
30 uk. OOlloff G-<i
11 uk. G,o.' o-<i
33 uk.lond F.'
2 Mo"Two'n F"
29 M.""I'" Hill H-5
. Mlm>' uk, E-<i
S N.ulil" E-5
t5 Dlymplo V;,w C.7
21 Pon"'" uk. E"
37 Rolnl"V;.w F.tO
., Sh.~ood Fo~.t 0"
" SiI~, uk. 0.7
,. S",uk. G-3
25 Sunnyo~.t G.,
13 Twin uk" B-<i
27 Volhollo G"
7 Wildwood F.S
,Woodmo"' F.3
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Codo--.
.. lIIoh"
" Kilo
62 uko"
61 S...¡ow..
70 Sogho",
65 Totem
e M.rit
E.'
G-<i
o-<i
E.S
C"
G.3
F-<i
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
Cod. -- .
80 De..tu' C-<i
81 F,d.,,1 Wo, E.S
83 '-homn J,ff",on G"
8 Ho"YS.TNmon F-<i
8 M.ril F-<i
Futu~ Sohool Sit,. - ¡¡;g
Su",lu.Sit"
':: ~~~o~u;~;~~~~;,:,~:t" ~~ = Cod,-- .
97 Mo'ntenonee-Ope"Uono.T"nopoNilon E-<i
s
.-.-
-.-.---
:'.«:....:..' @V
FEDERAL! ./
WAY~
"",'0'-""""""
'o"".,,'..m....
.~.....-.-
(253) 945.2000
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILiTIES PLAN
SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities - The Education Program
Portable Locations
Student Forecast - 2002 through 2007
Capacity Summaries
King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi Family Units
11
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Building Capacities
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's "standard of seryice" in order to
ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into
consideration the education program needs. The District has identified a Building Program
Capacity for each of the schools in the District. This Full Time Equiyalent (FTE) capacity is
based on:
The number of classrooms ayailable in each school
Any special requirements at each school
The contracted class load by grade leyel
In general, the District's current standard provides that the ayerage class size for a standard
classroom for grade K through grade 2 is 20 students, for grades 3-6 is 25 students and
grades 7-12 is 25 students. Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) classrooms are 25 students,
and special education classrooms are 12 students. This size is determined based upon current
ratios and trends as well as the physical size of the classroom. Educational Program
Capacities change eyery year. This analysis is for the 2001102 school year. The capacity of
an indiyidual school could and does change at any time depending on program changes which
may require additional space.
12
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES
ELEMENTARY BUILDING ~
PROGRAM CAPACITY ÌI r
Adelaide 441
Brioadoon 487
Camelot 357
Enterprise 405
Green Gables 432
Lake Dolloff 475
Lake Grove 430
Lakeland 447
Mark Twain 500
Meredith HiII 417
Mirror Lake 372
Nautilus 485 '
Olvmpic View 409
Panther Lake 409
Rainier View 417
Sherwood Forest 487
Silver Lake 487
Star Lake 450
Sunnycrest 409
Twin Lakes 447
Valhalla 462,
Wildwood 442,
Woodmont 360
2001 TOTAL 10,027
¡Elementary Average
436
Notes:
JUNIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
~
lIlahee 821
Kilo 854
Lakota 741
Sacaiawea 828
Saohalie 768
Totem 709
2001 TOTAL 4,721
¡Junior High Average
787 I
SENIOR HIGH BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
1,276
1,532
1,462
4,270
I 1,423 I
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL BUILDING
PROGRAM CAPACITY
Merit School 16
Truman High School 194
2001 TOTAL 210
Elementary program capacities are based on the number of teaching stations
in the building, contracted class size, and special use classrooms in place
during the 01102 school year. All available instructional space is calculated.
Secondary program capacities are based on peak loading.
The calculation is based on 25 students per available
teaching stations.
13
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Portable Locations
The Washington State Constitution requires the State to proyide each. student a basic
education. It is not efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for
500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the
year and from year to year.
Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students until
permanent facilities can be built or boundary adjustments can be made. When permanent
facilities become ayailable, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or
child care programs, or moyed to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables
may not be fit to moye due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may
choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables- It is the practice and
philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent
facilities.
The following page proYides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary
educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools.
14
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
""
""",cno",'. "",oe,,""".
Adelaide 3
Brioadoon 1
Camelot 1
Enterprise 3
Green Gables 1
Lake Dolloff 2
Lake Groye 2
Lakeland 2
Mark Twain 3
Meredith Hill 3
Mirror Lake 4
Nautilus 1
Olympic View 2
Panther Lake 3
Rainier View 3
Sherwood Forest 4
Silver Lake 4
Star Lake 4
Sunnycrest 1 1
Twin Lakes 2 1
Valhalla 2
Wildwood 4
Woodmont 3
TOTAL 58 2
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT JUNIOR HIGHS
""
""",enON"- ,,"'UCT"".".
Federal Way Public Academy 8 1
\\Iahee 3
Kilo 3 1
Lakota 3
Sacaiawea 3
Saghalie 4
Totem 5
TOTAL 29 2
15
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT SENIOR HIGHS
""
",,""""ON.". """'cn",...
D.ecatur 4
Federal Way 1
Thomas Jefferson
Truman 4 1
Merit 4
TOTAL 13 1
PORTABLES LOCATED
A T SUPPORT FACILITIES
MOT 1
ClothinQ Bank 1
TOTAL 2
HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES
Mirror Lake I
Sherwood Forest I
Total 2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Student Forecast
Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget deyelopment. Enrollment
projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The
majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students.
Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected
enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to
enrollment projections.
Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department.
Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level
and program leyel to include yocational and special education students.
The basis of projections has been cohort suryiyal analysis. Cohort suryiyal is the analysis of
a group that has a common statistical yalue (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a
stable population the cohort would pe 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical
infonnation to deyelop ayerages and project the ayerages forward. This method does not
trace indiyidual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The
district has used this method with yarying years of history and weighted factors to study
several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student
migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades
(kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on
birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for
kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student
enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below.
The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are
forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections yary depending on the number of years
of historical infonnation and how they are weighted.
A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows
the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections
for the district level. The Enrollment Maste?M software provides statistical methods
including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods.
This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment.
In November of 200 I, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal
Way School District. The report was complete in January 2002. The model used to forecast next
year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share
losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing
or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three
projections. The report substantiated that for next year, Federal Way expects little or no growth.
16
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth
rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used
for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else
(e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population
over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for
the District to the year 2015. This model produces a projection that is between 24.000 and 26.000
when applied to the low. medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-
range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models.
Short-tenn budget projections may be more conservative than the standard grade progression
model. For the 2002/03 school year, the district chose the Enrollment Maste?M projection
using standard grade progression model complemented by the work from the contracted
report. Standard grade progression is a reasonably accurate method for the near term future
when the near future looks much like the near past.
Long range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort
suryival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the
projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied
annually. The study includes infonnation from the jurisdictional demographers as they
project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by
Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the
projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington.
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The
Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions
complising the school district geography. These projections create a yision of the school
district in the future.
17
FEDERAL \VA Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections
Simplified FfE (K Headcount =.5 FfE; Junior High FfE=.989 Headeount; Senior High FfE = .933Headcount)
Total K -12 Percellt
School Year Elementary Junior High Senior High FTE Challge
1995-96 10,689 4,838 3,796 19,323 #REF!
1996-97 10,863 4,930 3,913 19,706 1.9%
1997-9S 11.123 5,073 4,OS2 20,278 2.8%
1998-99 11,480 5,080 4,120 20,680 1.9%
1999-00 11,622 5,110 4,348 21.079 1.9%
2000-01 11,640 5,300 4,390 21,330 1.2%
2001-02 11,498 5,331 4,415 21,244 -0.4%
nO02-03 1l,234 5,419 4,588 21.241 0.0%
P2003-04 9,333 5,501 6,420 21.254 0.1%
nO04-05 9,297 5,562 6,462 21,321 0.3%
P2005-06 9,307 5,506 6,534 21,347 O.J%
nO06-07 9,390 5,374 6,642 21,406 0.3%
nO07-08 9,637 5,300 6,748 21.685 1.3%
* New Configuration Elellleutary K-5 Middle Schoo/6-8 High 5choo19-12
23,000
22,000
21,000
ë
5 20,000
u
1;
:1! 19,000
~
.c
{j 18,000
0
17,000
16,000
15,000
Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast
3.0%
2.5%
2.0%
.1.5%
~
1.0% ~
...
0.5%
0.0%
-0.5%
-1.0%
-ø
'&
~
-ø
'%>
~
-ø
'£>
~
-ø
'%>
~
-ø
'ß
'b
'b<b
~
'b
~
'?>
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
¡;> ~ '& 'b i:2> 'b
School Year
=FTE
--+- Percenl 01 Change
18
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Capacity Summaries
All Grades, Elementary, -Junior HighlMiddle School, and Senior High Scho.ols
The Capacity Summaries combin~ Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast
information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and
why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures.
The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
District, and then eyaluating capacity Ys. number of students at elementary, junior high, and
senior high leyels indiyidually.
The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet proyide information about what facilities are in
place each year.
19
FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES
CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY
Add or subtract changes to capacity
Special Education Changes
Truman High modernization and expansion
Increase Capacity at1hree High Schools
Addtional Secondary Capacity
Federal Way Public Academy
New High School
Adjusted Program Capacity
ENROLLMENT
Basic FIE Enrollment
Internet Academy Enrollment
Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
RELOCA TABLE CAPACITY
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract Portable Capacity
Add New Portable Capacity
Deduct Portable Ca acit
Adjusted Portable Capacity
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE
CAPACITY
Actual
2001
- - Projected - -
2003 2004 2005
2002
2006
2007
19,228
~ 20,017
~
2t,845
19,991
21,381
21,355
19,228
c¡)
""
eo
p.
'"
(')
0
::I
::'I
~
c
""
~
0
::I
(zÚI <Ž6)~<
.. .
. .
.
. . .
... I . ...
.
21,355
2t,845
21,845
19,991
21,381
19,228
20,017
21,635
311
21,374
471
2,325
2,325
2,325
20
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY. ELEMENTARY SÇHOOLS
CAPACITY
BUll-DING PROGRAM
CAPACITY
Actual
2001
2002
z
..
.;
. - Projected - -
2003 2004 2005
2006
2007
Adjusted Program Capacity
10,027
10,027
10,001
9,975
9,949
9,923
9,923
1. Special Education Changes
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
ENROLLMENT
Basic FIE Enrollment
2. Intemet Academy
Basic FIE Enrollment without Intemet Academy
RELOCATABLECAPACITY 3.
Current Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450
..... ."",'. ~ y.
Add/Subtract portable capacity "u
...
... ...:.. I ":::.. <:.'..:.
Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCA TABLE
CAPACITY
1,794
NO1l':S:
I. Add Programs 2 ECEAP, I SBD (Severely Behavioral Disordered) and I Pre-School Program.
This reduces Basic Education capacity in the school years indicated.
2. Internet Academy student' are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
3. Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administratIve techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. 111is i, a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
21
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY
Actual - - Projected - -
2001 2002 ~ 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
~
4,721 4,721 " 4,933 4,933 4,933 4,933
i1 5,423
;=-.
Adjusted Program Capacity
1. Federal Way Public Academy
2 AddtionaI Secondary Capacity
ENROLLMENT
Basic FIE Enrollment
3. Internet Academy
Basic FIE Enrollment without Internet Academy
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 4.
Current Portable Capacity
Add/Subtract portable capacity
5. Add new portable capacity
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE
CAPACITY
Adjusted Portable Capacity
NOTES:
I Federal Way Public Academy Grades 6, 7 and 8
2. Add additional secondary capacity
3. lntemet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facililit<.
4. Relocatable Capacity is b'L<ed on the number of portables available and
other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a
. calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
5 Add portable capacity to Sacajawea Junior High
22
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMMARY - SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
CAPACITY
BUILDING PROGRAM
CAPACITY
Actual
2001
2002
4,453
4,453
Add or subtract changes in capacity
\. Truman Remodel
2. Add Capacity to Three High Schools
3. Federal Way Public Academy
4. Add New High School
..... :
I.."... .... ..
I
Adjusted Program Capacity
4,453
5,056
ENROLLMENT
Basic FTE Enrollment
5. Internet Academy
Basic Ed without Internet Academy
SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM CAPACITY
IÅ’LOCATAßLE CAPACiTY 6.
Current Portable Capacity
AddlSubtract portable capacity
7. Add new portable capacity
8. Deduct Portable Capacity
Adjusted Portable Capacity
SUlU'LUS OR (UNHOUSED)
PROGRAM AND RELOCATAßLE
CAPACITY
z
~
~
;::
- - Projected - -
2003 2004 2005
2007
2006
6,472
6,472
6,472
6,472
5,056
,
n
g
a;.'
"
;¡
õ'
"
.....:
~
~
~
......
.:
:::
6,472
6,472
6,472
6,472
6,472
6,74S
113
6,635
(163)
23
NOTES:
I. Truman High School modemization and expansion
2. Add capacity to three existing high schools
3. Federal Way Public Academy - Grades 9 and 10
4. Add new high school
5. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
6. Relocalable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and
other administrative teclmiques which can be used to temporarily
house students until permanent facilities are available. l1'¡s is a
calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used
will be based upon actual population needs.
7. Add portable capacity to high school
8. Portables at Trum:m and Merit will be demolished
23
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
King County. the City of Federal Way. and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations
Single and Multi-Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to
help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County. a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 2lA and was substantially
adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a
"Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school
district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction
costs. which are unique to that district.
- STUDENT GENERA nON FACTOR ANALYSIS
Federal Way Public Schoois student generation factor was determined separately for single
family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan
were derived using actual generation factors from single family units and multi-family units.
which were constructed in the last five (5) years-
- IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee
Calculation for single family. and multi-family units based on King County Code 2lA and the
Growth Management Act.
> Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12
months.
> Site Acquisition Costs is the per acre cost of the last school site purchased (site 85); this
is a negotiated purchase price.
Single Family Units
Multi-Famil Units
Plan Year 2002/03
Collection Year 2002103
$3,894.
$1,094.
Plan Year 2001102
Collection Year 2001102
$2,616.
$ 896.
24
FEDERAL WAY punuc SCHOOLS 2002103 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDENT GENERATION
NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary MIddle School SenIor !"Ilgh Total
SIn91e Family Multl.Family Elementary Middle School Senior High Student Student Student Student
DEVELOPMENT DwelIlnas Dweilinas Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor
01 HiGh Point Park 12 0 2 3 9 0.1667 0.2500 0.7500 1.1667 .
01 Woodbrock (Olv1) 49 0 12 15 8 0.2449 0.3061 0.1633 0.7143
00 Vlllaae at Star Lake 26 0 6 2 2 0.2308 0.0769 0.0769 0.3846
00 Dash Pointe 29 0 11 4 3 0.3793 0.1379 0.1034 0.6207
99 Greenfield Park 27 0 7 2 1 0.2593 0.0741 ' 0.0370 0.3704
99 Heritaae Woods 111 - 0 21 8 14 0.1892 0.0721 0.1261 0.3874
98 Brookshire North 21 0 7 3 4 0.3333 0.1429 0.1905 0.6667
98 Stone Brook 120 0 34 35 37 0.2833 0.2917 0.3083 0.8833
97 Southem Rose 25 0 12 6 6 0.4800 0.2400 0.2400 0.9600
(97) Grouse Pointe 30 0 7 7 11 0.2333 0.2333 0.3667 0.8333
Total 450 0 119 85 95
Student Generation ~oD¡/o3 ::6.264¡V ;:;0:;889::: ::;:)):.:2W1'::;:;:;:;: :;:0;6'644:::
Single Family Student Generation
:00)1/6') :
0.322.1
- ,g'/,
Ù.15'2.tI('
-1-7-4 »¿
O.14?"'"
-t4S'7~
o. ~L-'5Î
-no;'
Multi-Family Student Generation
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary MIddle School Senior HIgh Total
Single Family Multi-Family Elementary Middle School Senior High Student Student StUdent Student
DEVELOPMENT Dwellinos Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Faotor Factor
Barclay Ridee 0 240 13 13 11 0.0542 0.0542 0.0458 0.1542
Saddle brook 0 213 15 9 10 0.0704 0.0423 0.0469 0.1596
Sunrise Garden Townhomes 0 35 8 3 8 0.2286 0.0857 0.2286 0.5429
0 488 36 25 29
::a.iJ738::: :::0,.0512,:: :::0.1J594::::::::::: :::0;1844::::::
25
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE
School Site Acquisition Cost: Student Student
Facility Cdst / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/
Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR. MFR
Eleme,tary ......... 0....0q. ............. *.9.1 .......... .4.3..6/ ........ 0...2.6.~/ ........ 9:9L3.81 $0 I $0
2t Middle School ........ ~i~l~ ........ ¥~'~ .......... i ~ ........
"~)i~;~ $462 $130
I Middle School Federal Way Public Acacdemy - .6 of 3 acre parcel TOTAL[ $974 $269
2 Sr High Federal Way Public Acacdemy - .4 of 3 acre parcel
School Construction Cost: Student Student
% Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ CostJ
Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR
96.129'o[ $0 436l 0.26441 0.0738
'.MiddleElementarYschool ....... ¢'~ .'1¥'~o' [ ' ~'1'~,~'~'J,'l'156 ........... [ '~;~1 0.:[8.§.9
1st High ....... ¢'~.'1 '2'0o' / ' ~'4'~.;'~; ~,~'~ .......... i~i;;[ 0.2111/ 0.0594 $5,860 *I,649
i Middle School Additional Secondary Capacity - $15,400.0C4) - Capacity 490 TOTAL $10,408 $2,882
Federal Way Public Academy - $2.400.1 $2,287.
2 Sr High New Senior High - $43.800.000 - Capacity 1414
Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student
% Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost] Cost/
Total Sq Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementary 3.88%[ $0[ 251 0.2644~ 0.0738 $$I~$350
......... i.i;s'~i[ ..... ¥i~;g~'[ ............ i61 ........ bY£~ii~ ........
TOTAL
$12I $3
State Matching Credit Calculation: Student Student
Boeck Cost/ Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost]
Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR
I ~ $1,702
Elementary ...... .$. _l.O_.z2- ............. .8.0.[ ........ 9:.00.~ ........ 0. :2.__6~_ J ........ 9:0.7.3.8. $0 $0
Middle School $110.32 ~ 110[ 0.00% O. 1889~ 0.0512 $0 $0
New Sr High [ ...... ii'i6.'3¥'/ .......... i'2'6/ ....... ~67~igI ........ 675ii1/ ........ b:63~;; $479
Tota $1,702 $479
Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR
Average Assessed Value (April 2002) ....$.1.8.8_,_4_3.0. ..... i.$..4.827_.8J ....
Capital Bond Interest Rate (May 2002) 5.19% 5.19%
,,. Net Present Value of Average Dwelling ._$.J:4..4J:6.7.4' ..... $..3.6.9.,).9.7....
Years Amortized 10 I0
Property Tax Levy Rate $1.32 $1.32
Present Value of Revenue Stream $1,903 $488
' Single Family Multi-Family
Residences Residences
Mitigation Fee Summary
Site Acquisition Cost $ 974 $ 269
Permanent Facility Cost $ 10.408 $ 2,882
Temporary Facility Cost S 12 $ 3
State Match Credit $ (I,702) $ (479)
Tax Paylnent Credit $ (I.903) $ (488)
Sub-Total $ 7,789 $ 2,187
50% LocalSha~e $ 3,894 $ 1.094
IIIn, l,act Fee S 3,894 $ 1,094 If
26
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCItOOLS 2002~03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 4
SUMMARY 'OF CHANGES'FROM THE 2001102 C)kPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
The 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2001/02 Capital
Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2001/02 Plan and the 2002/03 Plan are listed
below.
SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIJES PLAN
CURRENT INVENTORY - UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
Site 82 is added. This is a small piece of property not sold when the mst of the site was sold.
This site was not shown in previous Capital Facility Plans
NEEDS FORECAST - NEW FACILITIES
Permanent capacity for Federal Way Public Academy is added.
SIX YEAR FINANCE PLAN
The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2002/2007
27
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FA.CILITIES PLAN
SECTION ill - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
CAPACITY
Elementary school capacity reflects the change in average class size, K through 2nd grade at
20 and 3 through 6th grade at 25. The ayerage capacity of senior high schools is increased
from 1372 to 1414. This change is a result of analysis of current building use and programs
in place for the 2001102 school year. Building Program Capacities are found on page 13.
PORTABLES
The list of portables reflects the moyement of portables between facilities or new portables
purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 15.
STUDENT FORECAST
The Student Forecast now covers 2002 through 2007. The new forecast reflects a decreased
rate of growth. Enrollment History and Projections are found on page 18.
CAPACITY SUMMARY
The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and
student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as
increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 20-23.
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A
The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment
made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2001102
Capital Facilities Plan and the 2002/03 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 29.
28
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2002/03 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2001/02 TO 2002/03
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Student Generation factors are based on rates for new deyelopments constructed over a
period of not more than fiye years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in
student Generation factors between the 2001/02 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2002/03
Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age
of the deyelopments. Student allocation is also changed to reflect the middle school
configuration. The Student General worksheet is found on page 25.
IMPACT FEE
Item
Percent of Permanent Facilities
Percent Temporary Facilities
Temporary Facility Cost
Boeck Cost/Sq. Ft
State Match
Ayerage Assessed Value
Capital Bond Interest Rate
Property Tax Levy Rate
Fromffo
96.56 to
96.12%
3.44% to
3.88%
$68,005- to
$79,695.
$103.55 to
$110.32
61.74% to
60.91 %
SFR-
$176,267 to
$188,430
MFR-
$49,627 to
$48,281
5.25% to
5.19%
$1.46 to
$1.32
29
Comment
Report #3 OS PI
Updated portable inventory
Updated cost of most recently
purchased portables
Change per OSPI
Change per OSPI
Per Puget Sound Educational Service
District (ESD 121)
Market Rate
King County Treasury Division
MEETING DATE:
August 20, 2002
ITEM# Ý Çz-)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
South 288'" Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection Improyements
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
~ CONSENT
~ RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS:
(I) Memo to Land Useffransportation Committee dated August 5, 2002;
(2) Resolution accepting the Federal Hazard Elimination (HES) grant; and
(3) The proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehayen Utility District for the South 288'" Street
Project.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
This project on S 288'" Street adds a second left-hand turn lane westbound and a left-hand turn lane eastbound at SR-99;
adds left-turn lanes at 18'" Ayenue S; interconnect signals on S 288th Street at SR-99 with Military Road at S 304th Street,
S 288" Street, and Star Lake Road. The purpose of the project is to improye traffic flow and reduce accidents by
eliminating conflicts.
In an effort to reduce costs and public disruption, the following planned projects will be incorporated into the design and
will be constructed as part of this project:
Lakehayen Utility District Water and Sewer Utility Adjustment
Utility Underground Conversion within project limits.
The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is
approximately 85% complete, and includes the following completed tasks:
The Topographical Surveys
Right of Way plan, appraisal and review appraisal
NEPA and Biological Assessment Pennitting
Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for Water and Sewer line relocation/replacement design
and construction
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Phase I
Project Design to 85%
Ongoing Tasks Include:
Utility Underground Conversion Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for project limit
Right of Way Requirements (Negotiation, and Acquisition)
Project Design to 100%
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Planning and Design
Right of Way Acquisition
Year 2003 Construction (estimate)
10% Construction Contingency
Construction Management
Underground Conversion (estimate)
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$169,200
326,000
1,368,700
136,870
135,000
200,000
$2.335.770
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
Total Grant FundIng
$1,569,520 TIA $1,201,270, HES $300,000,
WSDOT $68,250
Transfer in Street CIP Fund
468,000
9,622
21,813
8,202
$2077157
Mitigation
Interest Earning
Lakehaven Utility District
TOTAL AYAILABLE BUDGET
PROJECT BUDGET SHORTFALL
258,613
At this time this project budget has funding shortfall of $258,613, Staff is not requesting a budget adjustment for this
project at this time. As we proceed with the project Final design and right of way acquisitions process, the total project
costs and funding will be refined and presented to committee and Council at the 100% design completion status report for
further action. .
OVERHEAD UTILITIES CONVERSION
All oyerhead utilities along S 288th Street between 16th Ayenue Sand 19'h Ayenue S will be converted into an
underground system except for the Puget Sound Energy (PSE) electrical transmission system (115,000 volts or larger),
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
At its August 5' 2002 meeting, the Land Useffransportation Committee made the following recommendations:
1.
Authorize staff to proceed with fmal design of the South 288th Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection
Improyements project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 100% design completion stage for further
reports and authorization.
2.
Authorize the City to enter into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehayen Utility District for the
South 288th Street Project (SR-99 to Military Road South).
3,
Approve the attached resolution to accept the Federal Hazard Elimination (lIES) grant in the amount of
$300,000.00.
PROPOSED MOTION:
"I moye authorizing staff to proceed with the fmal design of South 288'h Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection
Improyement Project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 100% design completion stage for further authorization. I
also moye authorizing staff to enter into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehayen Utility District for the South
288th Street Project (SR-99 to Military Road South), and to approye the attached resolution to accept the Federal Hazard
~:::::~ ::~:: ::~' of "~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1sT reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
DATE:
August 5, 2002
TO:
VIA:
Eric Faison, Chair ~
Land Use / Transportation Committee
Marwan Salloum, Street Systems Manag
David H. Mo e Mager
FROM:
SUBJECT:
99 Signal and Intersection Improvements- 85% design Status
BACKGROUND:
This project on S 288th Street adds a second left-hand turn lane westbound and a left-hand turn lane eastbound at SR-99;
adds left-turn lanes at 18th Avenue S; interconnect signals on S 288th Street at SR-99 with Military Road at S 304th
Street, S 288th Street, and Star Lake Road. The purpose of the project is to improve traffic flow and reduce accidents by
eliminating conflicts.
In an effort to reduce costs and public disruption, the following planned projects will be incorporated into the design and
will be constructed as part of this project:
Lakehaven Utility District Water and Sewer Utility Adjustment
Utility Underground Conversion within project limits.
The following provides a brief synopsis of the progress on this project to date. Currently, the project design is
approximately 85% complete, and includes the following completed tasks:
The Topographical Surveys
Right of Way plan, appraisal and review appraisal
NEP A and Biological Assessment Pennitting
Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for Water and Sewer line relocation/replacement
design and construction
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Phase I
Project Design to 85%
Ongoing Tasks Include:
Utility Underground Conversion Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for project limit
Right of Way Requirements (Negotiation, and Acquisition)
Project Design to 100%
PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES:
Planning and Design
Right of Way Acquisition
Year 2003 Construction (estimate)
10% Construction Contingency
Construction Management
Underground Conversion (estimate)
TOTAL PROJECf COSTS
$169,200
326,000
1,368,700
136,870
135,000
200000
~
AVAILABLE FUNDING:
Total Grant Funding
$1,569,520 TIA $1,201,270, HES $300,000,
WSDOT $68,250
Transfer in Street CIP Fund
Mitigation
468,000
9,622
21,813
~
~
Interest Earning
Lakehaven Utility District
TOTAL AYAILABLE ßUDGET
PROJECf BUDGET SHORTFALL
258,613
At this time this project budget has funding shortfall of$258,613. Staff is not requesting a budget adjustment for this
project at this time. As we proceed with the project Final design and right of way acquisitions process, the total project
costs and funding will be refmed and presented to committee and Council at the 100% design completion status report for
further action.
OVERHEAD UTILITIES CONVERSION
All overhead utilities along S 288th Street between 16th Avenue S and 19th Avenue S will be converted into an
underground system except for the Puget Sound Energy (PSE) electrical transmission system (I 15,000 volts or larger).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff reconunends placing the following item on the August 20, 2002 Council consent agenda:
1. Authorize staff to proceed with fmal design of the South 288th Street at SR-99 Signal and
Intersection Improvements Project and return to the LUTC Committee at the 100% design
completion stage for further reports and authorization.
2. Authorization to enter into the proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District for
the South 288th Street Project (SR99 to Military Road South)
3. Approve the attached resolution to accept the Federal Hazard Elimination (HES) grant in the
amount of $300,000.
MS:dl
cc: Project File
Day File
.:"utc\2002\,o;288th ""'t" ""'. 85%.doc
RESOLUTION NO.
~~,t')'
/O<.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON
STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING
IMPROVEMENT OF SOUTH 288TH STREET BETWEEN 16TH
AVENUE SOUTH TO 19TH AVENUE SOUTH IN THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way applied for a grant from the Washington State
Department of Transportation for the purpose of (I) constructing eastbound and westbound left turn
lanes on State Route 99 at South 288th Street; (2) modifying the traffic signal to accommodate the
added lanes; and (3) accommodate left turn lanes at 18th A venue South, illumination, sidewalks and
asphalt concrete pavement oyerlay; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department ofTransportation agrees to grant the
City of Federal Way estimated federal funds in the amount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars
($300,000) provided that the CityCouncil authorize the City Manager to enter into the Local Agency
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, by accepting said grant the City of Federal Way agrees to execute the
Local Agency Agreement; and
WHEREAS, by accepting said grant the City of Federal Way agrees to match the
federal funds in an estimated amount of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($120,000), which
has been budgeted in the City's 2001 - 2002 budget;
Res.#_,Pagel
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
HEREBY RESOL YES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Execution of Acceptance of the Local Agency Agreement.
The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute the Local Agency
Agreement regarding improvement of South 288th Street Between 16th Avenue South to 19th Avenue
South in the City of Federal Way.
Section 2. Receipt of Federal Funds.
The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to receiye the state and federal
funds estimated to be Three Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($300,000.00).
Section 3. Matching Funds Authorized. Pursuant to the terms of the Local Agency
Agreement, the city commits approximately One Hundred Twenty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars
($120,000.00), in matching funds.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this resolution.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effective Date- This resolution shall be effective immediately upon
passage by the Federal Way City CounciL
Res. #_, Page 2
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, this - day of August, 2002.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
K: PublicWorkslResolution-South 288"h Street (SR 99 to Military)
Res. #_, Page 3
After recording, return to:
Federal Way City Attorney's Office
33530 1st Way South
PO Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
DRAft
'if/! pia ~
INTERLOCALAGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
AND LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
FOR THE
SOUTH 288TH STREET PROJECT
(SR-99 TO MILITARY ROAD SOUTH)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this - day of , 2002, by and
between the City of Federal Way (hereinafter "City") and Lakehaven Utility District (hereinafter "District"),
collectively referred to herein as the "Parties",
WHEREAS, the City proposes to proceed with the South 288'" Street Project (SR-99 to Military Road
South) (hereinafter "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the District provides water and sewer service in the general area of the Project in
accordance with applicable Washington State and City of Federal Way laws, regulations and franchises; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the roadway improvements being undertaken by the City, the District
will be required to relocate certain water and sanitary sewer facilities such as fire hydrants, valves, water
meters, etc.; resolve any waterline/utility conflicts; and adjust sewer manholes, within the Project area; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 (Interlocal Cooperation Act) permits local governmental units to make the
most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other entities to proYide services in a
manner best serving the needs and development of their local communities; and
WHEREAS, the District can achieve cost savings and other benefits in the public's interest by
contracting with the City to perform certain services for the District, including letting a public works
construction contract for the installation of the water improyements in connection with the Project
(hereinafter "District Work"), and proYiding construction management services in support thereof, as
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby covenanted and agreed by and between the Parties hereto as follows:
1.
PREDESIGN/DESIGN.
The District agrees that the City's design contractor, CH2M HILL, shall perform
predesign/design work for the Project. The District shall reimburse the City for the predesign report,
reproducible construction drawings, special contract provisions, and other necessary documents, which shall
Page 1
sufficiently detail requirements for the District Work to become a part of the plans and specifications for the
Project.
II.
BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.
A. It is the intention of the City and the District that the District plans and specifications
shall be incorporated into the Contract Bid Documents for the Project in such manner as to allow, to the
extent possible, identification of cost allocations between the Parties.
B. Following opening of construction bids on the Project, the District shall be furnished
with the bid responses submitted for the District Work for the District's approval. Within twenty days of
receiving the bid prices, the District shall notify the City in writing that the District either approves or rejects
their portion of the bid award. Bid award shall be made to the lowest responsible bidder for the total Project
subject to applicable laws and regulations. The City shall not proceed with the District Work until the City has
received approval from the District for its portion of the bid award; DroYided, however: if no bids are received
which, in the estimation of the District, are acceptable to the District for the District Work, the District shall so
immediately notify the City. The District Work shall be deleted from the project contract and, in this event;
the City shall proceed with its portion of the Project. This Interlocal Agreement shall terminate effective the
date of the District's notice to the City of the District's rejection of all bids.
III.
CONTRAcr ADMINISTRATION.
A. The City shall proYide the necessary administratiye, construction observation, and
clerical services necessary for the execution of the Project. In proYiding such services, the City Public Works
Director and/or his or her designee may exercise all the powers and perform all the duties yested by law in
him or her. The District grants to the City Public Works Director and/or his or her designee authority to act
on behalf of the District sufficient to carry out the proYisions of this Agreement.
B. The District shall notify the City, in writing, of any changes it wishes to make in the
plans and specifications which affect the District Work, which changes shall be made, if feasible. The City
shall notify the District, in writing, of any changes required of the District Work and shall obtain the District's
approyal of such changes. The District's approyal shall not be unreasonably withheld. The District shall be
responsible for all costs incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of these or any other changes required or
requested by the District.
IV.
PAYMENT.
A. The District shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City in performing
the District Work, which costs shall include but are not limited to the District Work performed by the Project
contractor(s), all District requested changes, and the District's cost of the City services described in Paragraph
III (a) herein, and as described in Exhibit B.
B. All payments shall be due from the District to the City within thirty (30) days after
approval by the District's Board of Commissioners of said sums billed to the District. Amounts unpaid after
said due date shall accrue interest at a rate of one (1) percent per month.
V.
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS.
A. The City agrees to indemnify and hold the District, its elected officials, officers,
employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including
costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their
respective agents, licensees, or representatiyes, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this Agreement
Page 2
to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the City, its agents or employees, or by the
City's breach of this Agreement.
B. The District agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers,
employees and agents harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including
costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their
respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising or resulting from, or connected with, this Agreement
to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the District, its agents or employees, or by
District's breach of this Agreement.
The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement with
respect to any event occurring prior to such expiration or termination.
VI.
DURATION.
This agreement shall become effectiYe immediately upon execution by both parties. This
Agreement shall continue in force until either (1) the District rejects all bids or (2) the City Council accepts the
completion of the project, whichever is earlier.
VII.
OTHER PROVISIONS.
A. The City shall retain ownership and usual maintenance responsibility for the roadway,
storm drainage system, sidewalks, landscaping, traffic signals and all other appurtenances related thereto.
B. Upon completion of the construction and City's acceptance of the Project as fully
constructed according to plans, specifications and change orders, the City shall provide a final inyoice to the
District for any final payment due. The District's payment of this final invoice shall, in effect, transfer
ownership of these water and sewer mains and appurtenances to the District and the District shall thereafter
be responsible for maintenance of such facilities.
C. This Agreement contains the entire written agreement of the Parties and supersedes
all prior discussion. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, signed by both Parties.
D. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from the date of signature by all
Parties to the date the City completes the Final Inspection upon completion of the Project and may be
extended for additional periods of time upon mutual written agreement of the City and Disbict. Adherence to
deadline dates is essential to the performance of this Interlocal Agreement.
E. Any provision of this Agreement, which is declared invalid, yoid or illegal shall in no
way affect, impair, or invalidate any other proYision hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force
and effect.
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefit accruing herein, the Parties hereto agree that the work, as
set forth herein, will be performed by the City under the terms of this Agreement.
Page 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
LAKE HAVEN UTlUTY DISTRICT
DaYid H. Moseley, City Manager
General Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bob C. Sterbank, City Attorney
General Counsel, Steyen H. Pritchett
ATIEST:
N. Christine Green, CMC, City Clerk
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
WATER MAIN RELOCATION ASSESSMENT
South 288th Street - Pacific Highway South to 19th Avenue South
City of Federal way
Agreement # 01-133
Scope of Services
Prepared by CH2M HILL
March 2002
WORK ELEMENT 8 - WATER MAIN RELOCATION ASSESSMENT
Work to be completed under this scope of work includes:
1. Assessment of the existing lakehaven Utility District (known hereafter as the
DISTRICT) water mains located on S. 288th Street between Pacific Highway S. and 19th
Ave S, and elsewhere within the limits of the proposed street improvement project.
This assessment will determine the need to relocate the mains to avoid conflicts with
the proposed improvements related to the S. 288th St. project. Approximately 700
linear feet of water main will be assessed. See Figure 1.
2. Field surveying valve locations and operator nut depths thereof.
3. Preparation of a technical memorandum including discussion of the results of the
assessment and providing a recommendation as to the need to relocate the water
mains.
4. A preliminary opinion of construction costs for the relocation of the water mains.
5. It is assumed no utility potholing will be completed under this scope of work. Water
main depths will be estimated based on water valve measure downs.
It is assumed that this scope of services will be completed within six (6) weeks of receipt of
the pothole information. To meet this schedule it is assumed that DISTRICT review of the
draft technical memorandum will be completed within two (2) weeks of submittal.
This scope of work does not include design of water main relocations, preparation of
design drawings, specifications or other construction documents. Inclusion of water main
profiles in the S. 288th Street plans is not included as part of this scope. The
CONTRACTOR will develop a separate scope of work and budget for the aforementioned
work upon acceptance by the CITY and the DISTRICT of the water main assessment
described in this scope of work.
Page 5
8.1 - FIELD INVESTIGATION
Valve Measure Downs
The CONTRACTOR will obtain and field locate with direction from the CITY ten (10) valve
locations. The DISTRICT will provide the CONTRACTOR the valve station locations and
typical distance to top of pipe from operating nut.
Field Surveys
The CONTRACTOR will coordinate to field survey each valve measure down It is assumed
that ten (10) valves will be field surveyed- The CONTRACTOR will use the same
horizontal and vertical datum as the South 288th Street project.
8.2 - RELOCATION ASSESSMENT
Plan and Profiles
Based on the valve measure-down information the CONTRACTOR will prepare plan and
profile sheets for mains running parallel to the centerlines of S. 288th Street between STA
51+00 and STA 61+00 and elsewhere within the limits of the proposed street
improvement project as may be required. Plan and profile sheets will show each valve
location including station, offset, elevation at exist ground and depth to top of pipe. A
dashed line indicating the assumed water main profile will be drawn between each valve
location. Because of the possibility that the actual water line profile varies along its length
between valve locations, no guarantee is made as to the accuracy of the drawn water main
profile between valve locations. The majority of the profiling of the water mains will be
based on measure down information and construction assumptions provided by the
DISTRICT. Therefore, the accuracy ofthe profiles will be dependent on the accuracy ofthe
information provided by the DISTRICT. In general, the profiling will be subject to
inaccuracies in measuring, assumptions of valve types and measurements, potential
presence of valve extensions (unknown), and errors in calculating the invert of the water
mains based on this cumulative data.
The CONTRACTOR will superimpose the proposed finish ground line and proposed storm
drain crossings from the South 288th Street project onto the profiles. The proposed
channelization for South 288th Street project will be superimposed over the existing
planimetrics.
Submittals: Draft plan and profiles
Final plan and profiles
Page 6
Technical Memorandum
The CONTRACTOR will review the valve information, plan and profile drawings, the South
288th Street preliminary design drawings and utility as-built information to assess the need
to relocate the existing water main. The assessment will be limited to the following:
. Depth of future cover. Based on the finish grade elevations established by
the South 288th Street project, the CONTRACTOR will review the future
depth of cover over the water mains and identify areas of insufficient cover.
The minimum cover required will be as determined by lakehaven Utility
District.
. Proposed utility conflicts. Based on the proposed storm drain and utility
undergrounding plans developed for the South 288th Street project the
CONTRACTOR will identify apparent conflict locations. Cost to resolve
individual conflicts will be developed under Work Element 8.3.
The CONTRACTOR will prepare a technical memorandum describing the assessment
performed, a comparison between relocation of the entire water main and resolution of
localized conflicts, provide a recommendation to the DISTRICT on whether the water
mains should be relocated or localized conflicts should be resolved. The assessment of
the water mains will not address the condition of the water mains or associated
appurtenances, capacity, or existing/future demand. No assessment of service laterals will
be made. Should the CONTRACTOR recommend relocation of the water mains, the
CONTRACTOR will provide a preliminary route for the relocated water main on the plan
and profile drawings prepared as part of 8.2.
Submittals: Draft Technical Memorandum
Final Technical Memorandum
8.3 - CONSTRUCTION OPINION OF COST
Opinion of Cost
The CONTRACTOR will prepare a preliminary opinion of construction cost for both the
relocation of the water main and/or resolution of localized conflicts for comparison
purposes. Since no detailed design of the water main will have been performed, this will
be a planning level estimate suitable only for comparison purposes. The opinion of cost
will be based on a linear foot cost to relocate/adjust the water main. The unit price per
linear foot will include excavation, backfill, shoring, material and labor, fittings and valves
and incidentals. A detailed breakdown of quantities will not be prepared. A thirty percent
(30%) contingency will be applied to the opinion of cost.
In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, and
schedules for the PROJECT, the CONTRACTOR has no control over cost or price of labor
and materials: unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may
affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market
Page 7
conditions; time or quality performance by operating personnel or third parties; and other
economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate PROJECT cost or
schedule. Therefore, CONTRACTOR makes no warranty that the CITY's actual PROJECT
costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from
CONTRACTOR's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates.
If the CITY wishes greater assurance as to any element of PROJECT cost, feasibility, or
schedule, the CITY will employ an independent cost estimator, CONTRACTOR, or other
appropriate advisor.
Submittals:
Draft Opinion of Cost
Final Opinion of Cost
8.4 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The CONTRACTOR will be under contract with the CITY- The CONTRACTOR will provide
overall project management, coordination with the DISTRICT and CITY, monthly progress
reports and invoicing. .
Project management and administrative services including:
. Set-up project and execute agreement.
. Preparation and execution of subcontractor subcontracts
. Preparation and review of monthly progress reports and invoices.
. Closeout and archive project record systems.
Page 8
City of Federal Way
South 288th St. c Water Main Relocation Assesment
TOTAL BUDGET SUMMARY
March 8, 2002
1. Direct Salary cost (DSC)
'" 'Man Hourly Raw
Classification Role: '¡', 'Ho~rs Rate Cost ,
E-VI Senior Engineer 0 $49,37 $0
P-VI Environmental Planner 0 $39,79 $0
E-V Project Manager 13 $37,25 $484
E-IV Senior Drainage Enginee 0 $27.59 $0
E-lil Project Engineer 0 $25,00 $0
E-!I Project Engineer 53 $21,87 $1,159
ST-IV Survey Technician 0 $25,00 $0
T-IV Drafting Technician 24 $17,18 $412
OA Clerk Steno 10 $16,88 $169
SUBTOTAL (DSC) 100 $2,224
3. Overhead Costs (OH) 176.60% x DSC= $3,928
4. Fixed Fee: 32.00% x DSC= $712
5. Reimbursables 100.00% $947
6- GRAND TOTAL - Estimated Fee I I $7,812
City of Federal Way
South 288th St. . Water Main Relocation Assesment
March 8, 2002
REIMBURSABLES
'"".
Relocation
Reimbursable Item Assessment Totals
Task 8
A. Reprographics and Printing $50 $50
B. Travel Costs (Mileage @ $0.315/mi) $47 $47
C. Miscellaneous (Survey, postage, etc.) $850 $850
Totals $947 $947
City of Federal Way
South 288th St.. Water Main Relocation Assesment
March 8, 2002
WORK HOUR ESTIMATE
SR ENV PROJ LEAD PROJ PROJ ORAFT a RAFT CLERK TOTAL TOTAL
ENGR PLNNR MGR ENGR ENGR ENGR TECH TECH STENO LABOR
WORK ELEMENT EO P6 E5 E4 E3 E2 T4 T2 OA HRS "S
8. Water Main Relocation Assessme"t
8.1 Reid investigation 12 12 $810
8.2 Relocation Assessment 8 32 24 4 68 $4,560
8.3 Construçt;on Opinion or Cos! 1 8 9 $655
8.4 Project Management 4 1 6 11 $840
V'IuR 8 u 0 13 0 0 53 0 24 10 100 '6,865
TOTAL LABOR HOURS 0 0 13 0 0 53 0 24 10 100 6,865
City of Federal Way
South 288th St. - Water Main Relocation Assesment
March 8, 2002
BUDGET SUMMARY, BY TASK
Total Total Overall
Task Description Labor Reimbursables Totals
8. Water Main Relocation Assessment $6,865 $947 $7,812
TOTALS $6,865 $947 $7,812
EXHIBIT B
SOUTH 288TH STREET (SR 99TO MILITARY ROAD SOUTH)
ESTIMA TED PRE-DESIGN, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, PROJECT ADMINISTRA TlON AND
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COSTS FOR INCLUDING LAKEHA VEN UTILITY DISTRICT
UTILITY RELOCA TION AND ADJUSTMENTS
ESTIMATED PRE-DESIGN COST
Estimated pre-design costs for lakehaven utility relocations (CH2M Hill)
$7,812.00
ESTIMATED DESIGN COST
Estimated design costs for lakehaven utility relocations (CH2M Hill)
$TBD
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Subtotal Construction
$TBD
$TBD
$TBD
Sales Tax @ 8.8% of Construction Cost
Subtotal Constriction Including Sales Tax
$TBD
Construction Contingency (10% of Construction cost)
Construction Management (10% of Construction cost)
ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
$TBD
$TBD
$TBD
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (Predesign, Design & Construction)
$7,812.00
Project Administration (5% of project cost)
$ 390.60
$8,202.60
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
Note: The Ágreement will be amended to include amounts to be determined ("TBD'),
including estimated design, construction, and project administration costs when the
estimates have been prepared. Costs presented are estimates only. Actual costs incurred
will be used to calculate final cost of Lakehaven Utility District's utility relocation portion for
reimbursement to the City.
Page 9
MEETING DATE:
August 20, 2002
ITEM#
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
South 364th Street Culvert Replacement
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
~ CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Bndgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Land Use / Transportation Committee dated August 5, 2002.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
Fiye (5) bids were receiyed and opened on July 19,2002 at 2:15 p.m. for the South 364th Street Culvert Replacement
Project (see attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The lowest responsiye, responsible bidder is Americon, Inc. with a total
bid of $42,976.00, tax included.
Reference checks on Americon, Inc. by City staff indicate that the contractor has perfonned similar work. As a result,
City staffbelieyes Americon, Inc. can successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder is Americon, Inc. in the amount of $42,976.00, tax included.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Construction Low Bid
10% Construction Contingency
Design
Construction Management
Total Project Cost
$ 42,976.00
$ 4,297.60
In house
In house
$ 47273.60
PROJECT FUNDING:
The project will be funded by a $30,000 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Grant, and the SWM
small works CIP budget.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
At its August 5, 2002 meeting, the Land Use / Transportation Committee recommended:
I. Award the project to Americon, Inc. in the amount of $42,976.00 and approve a 10% contingency of
$4,297.60 for a total of$47,273.60.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
PROPOSED MOTION:
"I move the S 364th Street Culvert Replacement Project be awarded to Americon, Inc., the lowest responsive, responsible
bidder in the amount of $42,976.00 and approye a 10% contingency of $4,297.60 for a total of $47,273.60 and authorize
the City Manager to execute the contract"
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED-O5/10/2001
DATE:
August 5, 2002
TO:
Eric Faison, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee
Paul A. Bucich" Surface W ater Mam.ge~
David H- M~nager
South 36410 Street Culvert Replacement
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND
Four (4) bids were received and opened on July 19, 2002 at 2:15 p.m. for the South 364'" Street Culvert Replacement Project
(see attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Americon, Inc. with a total bid of
$42,976.00, tax included-
Reference checks on Americon, Inc. by City staff indicate that the contractor has perfonned similar work. As a result, City
staff believes Americon, Inc. can successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder is Americon, Inc. in the amount of$42,976.00, tax included.
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Construction Low Bid
10% Construction Contingency
Design
Construction Mam.gement
Total Project Cost
$ 42,976.00
$ 4,297.60
In house
In house
$ 4727360
PROJECT FUNDING:
The project wiIl be funded by a $30,000 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Grant, and the SWM
small works CIP budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff reconnnends placing the following items on the August 20, 2002 Council agenda for approval:
1. Award the project to Americon, Inc. the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $42,976.00 and
approve a 10% contingency of $4,297.60 for a total of$47,273.60.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
PRdl
Projecl File
Day File
K,ILlJra2002\S 364th Sl Cul- R",I"'""nt Bid Aw"d.doc
Bid Tabulation
South 364th Street Culvert Replacement
Bid opening July 19, 2002
Item Amount Unn
1 Structural Plate Pi Arch Culvert Installation 1 LS
Sales Tax 8.8'4
Total Bid Amount (Attachment B)
Bid Signature (Attachment D)
Bid Bond (Attachment E)
No Addendum received/used
Different Sales Tax used by contraclo<
Total Bid Amount due to lower Sales Tax used
""'.-;l'IT" ij' "
Bid 1
Amerlcon
Unn Price Total
39500.00 $39,500.00
$3,476.00
$42,976.00
Ves
Ves
NtA
No
NtA
Bid 2
Lloyd Enterprises
UnitPnce Total
41436.46 $41,436.46
$3,646.41
$45,082.87
Ves
Ves
NtA
8.6%
$45,000.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Ves
Ves
NtA
4.4%
$53,244.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NtA
NtA
NtA
NtA
NtA
-___.m______-.-.-.-----------...-.-----------------.---.-.-----.----------.--.--...
-'-'------'--'-'--'-"--------------.-..-.-.-.-
ITEM#~~~
MEETING DATE:
August 20, 2002
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: King County Office of Emergency Management; Request Approyal to Accept Domestic Preparedness
Equipment Support Program
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
~ CONSENT
D RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditnre Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety memo ITom Chief Kirkpatrick, and the letter to
Mayor Jeanne Burbidge ITom the King County Department of Executive Services on the Domestic Preparedness
Equipment Support Program, which includes the Index of Attachments and Attachments "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", and "F".
Attachments "A", "B", and "D" must be signed by the Mayor.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
The State of Washington was awarded $1,538,000 in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2001, under the US Department ofJustice
(DO]), Office of Justice Programs, Office for Domestic Preparedness State Domestic preparedness Equipment Support
Program. The Washington State Military Department was designated the State Administratiye Agency for this grant
program. The purpose of the grant funding is to purchase equipment, in accordance with the strategic plans to ensure that
the nation's state and local emergency responders haye the requisite equipment required to properly respond to terrorist
incidents inyolving weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Successful response to a terrorist incident may require mutual aid resources fÌom all WMD equipment recipient
agencies in King County. This equipment is considered part of the mutual aid resources available under the
mutual aid agreements already in place among law enforcement, fire, EMS, and hazardous materials service
proyiders. This is a one-time grant and as a final sub-recipient, the Federal Way Department of Public Safety is
requesting authorization to accept this equipment. We will be responsible for the maintenance, training, and
proper storage of this equipment. This grant will not replace any equipment lost, stolen, or unrepairable. In
addition, we will hold the Department of Justice, the Washington State Military Department and King County
harmless for any and all damages that may result fÌom this equipment. The equipment is outlined below:
Line Item Description Unit Qty Total Cost Discipline
Item Cost
1 MSA, Air Purifying Respirator-Advantage 1000 $127.62 91 ea $11,613.42 (91) For distribution to
Riot. FaceDiece - law enforcement. Federal Wav Police Agencv
2 MSA, Advantage CBA-RCA canister fot APR, used $23.63 91 ea $2,150.33 (91) For distribution to
for chern.lbio and riot control Pkg of 6. Federal Wav Police Agency
3 Vehicle Kit consisting of: lea BIC Suit, 1 pr. DSC $79.72 41 ea $3,268.52 (41)Fordistributionto
Latex Booties, Ipr Ansell Nitrile gloves, lea Roll Federal Way Police Agency
Chern-TaDe lea Chern/Bio Filter Canister
4 Total Jurisdictional Value of Eauioment $17032.27
.---..--.----.-.--.---.--.----.-..--.-.---.-----.---------.----------.--------..------.-.-.-----.-.---....------.-.-.-.----.--.-.-.-.-------.---.-.-.-.-.-..---.-.--..---...--.-.-.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to accept the State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program award of equipment yalued in the amount
of$17,032.27.
PROPOSED MOTION: I moye approyal of the King County Office of Emergency Management; Request Approyal to
Accept Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program.
~;;~:~:~;-:;;~~~:-:---_._--_.~---- ---------
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
5.B
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Date:
August 12, 2002
To:
From:
Parks, Recreatiou, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee
Anne Kirkpatrick, Chief of POI&- ¿
David Mose~r
King County Office of Emergency Management; Request Approval to
Accept Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program
Via:
Subject:
Backl!round:
The State of Washington was awarded $1,538,000 in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2001, under the US
Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Office for Domestic Preparedness State Domestic
preparedness Equipment Support Program: The Washington State Military Department was designated the
State Administrative Agency for this grant program. The purpose of the grant funding is to purchase
equipment, in accordance with the strategic plans to ensure that the nation's state and local emergency
responders have the requisite equipment required to properly respond to terrorist incidents inyolving
weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Successful response to a terrorist incident may require mutual aid resources trom all WMD
equipment recipient agencies in King County. This equipment is considered part of the mutual aid
resources available under the mutual aid agreements already in place among law enforcement, fire,
EMS, and hazardous materials service proyiders. This is a one-time grant and as a final sub-
recipient, the Federal Way Department of Public Safety is requesting authorization to accept this
equipment. We will be responsible for the maintenance, training, and proper storage of this
equipment. This grant will not replace any equipment lost, stolen, or unrepairable. In addition, we
will not hold the Department of Justice, the Washington State Military Department and King County
harmless for any and all damages that may result trom this equipment. The equipment is outlined
below:
Line Item Description Unit Qty Total Cost Discipline
Item Cost
I MSA, Air Purifying Respirator-Advantage 1000 $127.62 91 ea $11,613.42 (91) For distribution to
Riot. Facepiece - law enforcement. Federal Wav Police Agencv
2 MSA, Advantage CBA-RCA canister for APR, used $23.63 91 ea $2,150.33 (91) For distribution to
for chem./bio and riot control Pkg of 6. Federal Way Police Agency
3 Vehicle Kit consisting of: lea B/C Suit, Ipr. DSC $79.72 41 ea $3,268.52 (41) For distribution to
Latex Booties, Ipr Ansell Nitrile gloves, lea Roll Federal Way Police Agency
Chern-Tape lea ChemlBio Filter Canister
4 Total Jurisdictional Valne of Equipment $17032.27
Committee Recommendation:
Motion to accept the State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program award of equipment yalued
in the amount of$17,032.27 and forward to full Council for consideration at its Au ust 20 2002 meetin .
AP~ROVAt OFCOM1\nTTEE RE1;fORT:
5-1
i/lcamdenlagenda/081202/State Domestic Preparedness Equip Sup Program.doc
(!)
King County
c~ f <í_I<f!íìV\c<
p¡~ ~~C4W-J'\O Ý~I~\r"~~~~FðV'
~lq~Ì\.\,v<-t 1 ~tl "1:-
Shad Burcham 1\1... u \C~
Pl"Ogram Coordinator ~
Office of Emergency Management
Em<"l1en'Y Management Dimioo
7300 Perim,", Road South, Room 128
"'attl" W A 98101>-3848
(206) 205-8106 FAX (206) 296-38311 Cell (,206) 612-6646
~'::;"f".~~t?":;":~~::o~~ .... €b
@
KING COUNTY
Department of
Executive Services
King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue, Room 410
Seattle, WA 98104-3271
206-296-3824
206-296-3829 Fax
711 TTY Relay
June 28, 2002
DRAFT
The Honorable Jeanne Burbidge
Mayor
City of Federal Way
PO Box 9718
Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718
Dear Mayor Burbidge:
The state of Washington was awarded $1,538,000 in Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2001, under the
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Office for Domestic
Preparedness State Domestic Preparedness Equipment Support Program. The Washington
State Military Department was designated the State Administrative Agency for this grant
program and worked closely with the county emergency management agencies to effectively
make use of this resource through the assessment process. The purpose of the grant funding is
to purchase equipment, in accordance with the strategic plans, to ensure that the nation's state
and local emergency responders have the requisite equipment required to properly respond to
terrorist incidents involying weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Realistically, successful
response to a terrorist incident may require mutual aid resources from all WMD equipment
recipient agencies in King County. This equipment is considered part of the mutual aid
resources available under the mutual aid agreements already in place among law enforcement,
fire, EMS, and hazardous materials service providers.
Attachment A provides the projected list of equipment that will be distributed to your jurisdiction
through FFY 2001 funds. This list is an estimate of the equipment that your jurisdiction
will receive and is subject to change, due to price fluctuation, tax variance, shipping
costs, etc. After review of the attached list, an authorizing signature must be given to verify
your jurisdiction will receive the listed equipment. If your jurisdiction wishes to waive the order of
some, or all, of the equipment listed, please notify King County Office of Emergency
Management in writing.
The decisions on WMD equipment types and distribution were made by a multi-disciplinary team
composed of representatives of Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, local
Emergency Management Agencies, local Public Health, local Emergency Medical Services,
Washington State Department of Health, Washington State Association of Fire Chiefs,
Washington State Patrol, and Washington Emergency Management Division. Population,
geography, potential targets and hazardous materials response capabilities were included in the
decision making process for equipment allocation.
~......,=.
"TO SERVE THE PUEfJa/Rrl:ßJfJ ENABLE OTHERS TO SERVE"
The equipment allocation process focused on life and safety issues. This focus narrowed the
equipment selection process to personal protective equipment and detection equipment.
The scope of the equipment allocation process was further narrowed using a 150-responder
model touted nationally for WMD response. This is based on the philosophy that only so many
responders can effectively manage a WMD event in, and in close proximity to, the HOT ZONE.
The 150-responder model is comprised of 15 HAZMAT, 85 fire, 25 EMS, and 25 law
enforcement responders. This model was used to limit the maximum amount of equipment
allocated to a specific jurisdiction and to give every jurisdiction an opportunity to receive
responder personal protective and detection equipment. For example, Jurisdiction X requested
350 Leyel C ensembles for firefighters. They were allocated 170 Level C ensembles, a primary
and back-up suit for 85 firefighters in accordance with the model. A back-up suit was provided
because these suits are essentially throw-a-ways after an event occurs.
Additionally, the group restricted Level A ensembles to HAZMAT only and focused on proyiding
requested detection equipment to HAZMAT, then fire, EMS, and finally law enforcement. The
reasoning was that most of this equipment must be used in the HOT ZONE and HAZMAT
responders are the only ones properly equipped and trained to operate in the HOT ZONE.
Lastly, the group avoided allocating equipment that response agencies should already have as a
normal course of their day-to-day operations, i.e., SCBA and turnouts, etc. The group also
reached a consensus that it would not allocate escape masks until certification issues identified
in prior DOJ purchases for King County were resolved.
As a recipient of federal funding, the Military Department made certain assurances to the U.S.
DOJ in the grant application. The receiving agency must abide by some of the assurances, as
well. Specifically, non-discrimination and lobbying requirements require certifications by sub-
recipients of the funding under this grant. The required certifications are enclosed with this letter
as Attachment B, Certifications and Assurances.
The federal funding also places property management responsibility on the Military Department
and its sub-recipients. Attachment C provides the Department of Justice Property and
Equipment Post Award Requirements, which will become the responsibility of the final recipient
of the equipment.
Finally, the Military Department and King County Office of Emergency Management are acting
as pass through agencies for the purchase and distribution of the equipment purchased with the
grant funds. Once the equipment is delivered it becomes the property of, and responsibility of,
the final receiving agencies to provide training, maintenance, and storage. The Distribution
Agreement, between the King County OEM and the final receiving agency (City of Federal Way)
for property management, is also included with this letter as Attachment D. The sub-recipients
(final receiving agencies), i.e. King County Cities, Special Purpose Districts, King County
Government Departments, will be responsible for the inventory accountability to the Military
Department for DOJ audits on the items accepted by that jurisdiction. Although Congress has
appropriated significant funding for this equipment, this grant does not mandate that your
jurisdiction purchase replacement equipment.
Attachment F is a sample hand receipt that will accompany each deliyery.
Page 2 of 3
Please complete the Index of Attachments, along with signatures on Attachments A, B, D, and
E. If you have questions please call Mr. Shad Burcham at 206-205-8106. When signed, please
mail to Mr. Burcham at: King County Office of Emergency Management
7300 Perimeter Rd. South
Federal Way, WA 98108-3848
Thank you for your support on this critical issue.
Sincerely,
?~~
Paul Tanaka
County Administrative Officer
Enclosure
cc:
Eric Holdeman, Mgr Office of Emergency Management, Department of Executive
Services (DES)
Shad Burcham, Program Coordinator, OEM, DES
Page3of3
INDEX OF ATTACHMENTS
Washington State - FFY01 DOJ Equipment Grant
This list is a summary of the attachments discussed in the letter and also indicates the
action needed by the recipient agency.
Attachment A: WMD 01 Equipment Projected to be Distributed from Washington
State Military Department through KC OEM to the City of Federal Way
Signed:
Yes No
Attachment B: Certifications and Assurances (Attachment must be signed.)
Signed:
Yes No
Attachment C: Department of Justice Property and Equipment Post Award
Requirements
Please initial:
Concur
Attachment D: Distribution Agreement (Attachment must be signed.)
Signed:
Yes No
Attachment E: Agency Point of Contact for Delivery
Completed (Please initial):
Yes No
Attachment F: Sample Hand Receipt
Please initial:
Concur
Attachment A
King County - FFY01 DOJ Equipment Grant
Name of Jurisdiction or Agency: King County Department of Executive Services,
Office of Emergency Management (OEM)
Contact Person, Shad Burcham OEM; Telephone 206-205-8106
WMD FFYO1 EQUIPMENT PROJECTED TO BE DISTRIBUTED
FROM
WASHINGTON STATE MILITARY DEPARTMENT
TO
King County Office of Emergency Management with Pass-Through to the City of
Federal Way
Equipment Item Unit Cost Qty Total Cost Discipline
Category
Personal MSA, Air Purifying Respiratot-Advantage $127.6 91 EA. $11,613.4 91)FOR
Protectiye 1000 Riot. Facepiece -law enforcement. ISTRIBUTION TO
EDERAL WAY
OLiCEAGENCY
MSA, Advantage CBA-RCA canister for $23.6 91 EA. $2,150.3 91) FOR
PR, used for chemlbio and riot control. ISTRIBUTION TO
k9. of6 EDERAL WAY
POLICE AGENCY
ehide Kit consisting ot1 ea. BtC Suit, $79.7 41 $3,268.5 41)FOR
1pr.DSC Latex Booties, 1pr Ansell Nitrile DISTRIBUTION TO
loves, 1 ea. Roll Chern-Tape, 1 ea. FEDERAL WAY
hemlBio Fmer Cannister POLICE AGENCY
Total Jurisdictional Value of Equipment: $17,032.27
I, on behalf of The city of Federal Way, WA, , agree to accept the equipment listed
above.
"""" .
""""
"""",
""""
.........
~.
Jeanne Burbidge
Mayor
Page 1 of2
Attachment B
King County - FFY01 DOJ Equipment Grant
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
As a recipient of equipment purchased with federal funds under the STATE AND
LOCAL DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS EQUIPMENT SUPPORT PROGRAM project,
Award Number (2002-TE-CO048) (CFDA 16.007), The city of Federal Way, WA makes
the following certifications and assurances:
1.
OMNIBUS CRIME CONTROL AND SAFE STREETS ACT OF 1968: It will
comply with the applicable provisions of Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control
and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, the Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; the
provisions of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs Financial and
Administrative Guide for Grants, M71 00.1; and all other applicable Federal
laws, orders, circulars, or regulations.
2.
CIVIL RIGHTS: It will comply with the nondiscrimination requirements of the
Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC
3789(d), or Victims of Crime Act (as appropriate); TItle VI of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
(1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR
Part 42, Subparts C,D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on
disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39. .
3.
LOBBYING: As required by Section 1352 of the U.S. Code, and implemented
at 28 CFR Part 69, for persons entering into a grant or cooperative agreement
over $100,000, as defined at 28 CFR Part 69, the applicant certifies that:
a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf
of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any Federal grant or cooperative agreement;
b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be
paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and
submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in accordance
with its instructions.
Page1of2
Attachment B
King County - FFYO1 DOJ Equipment Grant
c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included
in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subgrants,
contracts under grants and cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) and
that all final receiving agencies (sub-recipients) shall certify and disclose
accordingly.
~~::!!
Jeanne Burbidge
Mayor
Date
Page2of2
Attachment C
King County- FFYO1 DOJ Equipment Grant
. Chapter 8: Confidential Funds
. Chapter 9: Subawards
PART III -- POST AWARD
REQUIREMENTS
. Chapter 1: Payments
. Chapter 2: Period of
Availability of Funds
. Chapter 3: Matching or Cost
Sharing
. Chapter 4: Program Income
. Chapter 5: Adjustments to
Awards
. Chapter 6: Property and
Equipment
. Chapter 7: Allowable Costs
. Chapter 10: Procurements Under Awards of Federal Assistance
. Chapter 11: Reporting Requirements
. Chapter 12: Retention and Access Requirements for Records
. Chapter 13: Sanctions
. Chapter 14: Termination for Convenience
. Chapter 15: Costs Requiring Prior Approval
. Chapter 16: Unallowable Costs
. Chapter 17: Indirect Costs
. Chapter 18: Closeout
. Chapter 19: Audit Requirements
Page 1 of 3
Attachment C
King County- FFYO1 DOJ Equipment Grant
Chapter 6: Property and Equipment
Acquisition of Property and Equipment. Recipientslfinal receiving agencies
(subrecipients) are required to be prudent in the acquisition and management of
property with Federal funds. Expenditure of funds for the acquisition of new property,
when suitable property required for the successful execution of projects is already
available within the recipient or sub recipient organization, will be considered an
unnecessary expenditure-
Note: Equipment purchased using funds made available under Federal grants shall be
year 2000 compliant and shall be able to process all time/date data after December
31,1999.
Screening- Careful screening should take place before acquiring property in order to
ensure that it is needed with particular consideration given to whether equipment
already in the possession of the recipientlsubrecipient organization can meet identified
needs. While there is no prescribed standard for such review, recipientlsubrecipient
procedures may establish levels of review dependent on factors such as the cost of
the proposed equipment and the size of the recipient or subrecipient organization.
The establishment of a screening committee may facilitate the process; however, a
recipient or subrecipient may utilize other management techniques which it finds
effective as a basis for determining that the property is needed and that it is not
already available within the recipient's organization.
The awarding agency.'s program monitors must ensure that the screening referenced
above takes place and that the recipientlsubrecipient has an effective system for
property management. Recipients/subrecipients are hereby informed that if the
awarding agency is made aware that the recipientlsubrecipient does not employ an
adequate property management system, project costs associated with the acquisition
of the property may be disallowed.
loss, Damage, or Theft of Equipment. Recipients/Final Receiving Agencies
(subrecipients) are responsible for replacing or repairing the property which is willfully
or negligently lost, stolen, damaged, or destroyed. Any loss, damage, or theft of the
property must be investigated and fully documented and made part of the official
project records.
Real Property Acquired with Formula Funds.
1. land Acquisition. Block/formula funds CANNOT be used for land acquisition.
2. Title. Subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in the award, title to real
property acquired under an award or subaward vests, upon acquisition, in the recipient
or subrecipient.
3. Use of Real Property. The recipient and its subrecipients may use real property
acquired, in whole or in part, with Federal funds for the authorized purposes of the
original grant or subaward as long as needed for that purpose. The subrecipients shall
Page 2 of 3
Attachment C
King County- FFYO1 DOJ Equipment Grant
maintain an inventory report which identifies real property acquired, in whole or in part,
with block or formula funds. The recipient or subrecipient shall not dispose of or
encumber its title or other interests.
4. Disposition. The subrecipient shall obtain approval for the use of the real property
in other projects when the subrecipient determines that the real property is no longer
needed for the original grant purposes. Use in other projects shall be limited to those
under other Federally-sponsored projects or programs that have purposes consistent
with those authorized for support by the State. When the real property is no longer
needed as provided above, the sub recipient shall request disposition instructions from
the State. The State shall exercise one of the following:
a. Direct the real property to be transferred to another subrecipient or a criminal justice
activity needing the property, provided that use of such real property is consistent with
those objectives authorized for support by the State.
b. Return all real property furnished or purchased wholly with Federal funds to the
control of the awarding agency. In the case of real property purchased in part with
Federal funds, the subrecipient may be permitted to retain title upon compensating the
awarding agency for its fair share of the property. The Federal share of the property
shall be computed by applying the percentage of the Federal participation in the total
cost of the project f<?r which the property was acquired to the current fair market value
of the property. In those instances where the subrecipient does not wish to purchase
real property originally purchased in part with Federal funds, disposition instructions
shall be obtained from the awarding agency.
Page 3 of 3
Attachment D
King County - FFYO1 DOJ Equipment Grant
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
This Contract is entered into by King County, represented by the Department of
Executive Services, Office of Emergency Management and the City of Federal Way
(Final Receiving Organization or sub recipient), whose address is P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718. King County is undertaking certain activities
related to the STATE AND LOCAL DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS EQUIPMENT
SUPPORT PROGRAM Project as funded by the U.S. Department of Justice under
Grant Award Number (2002-TE-COO48). Under the terms and conditions of Grant
Award Number 2002-TE-CO048, King County will be distributing specialized
emergency response equipment to the City of Federal Way. The distribution of the
equipment is subject to the following terms and conditions-
1.
The equipment delivered to the City of Federal Way (Final Receiving
Organization or subrecipient ) is as described in Attachment A.
2.
The equipment delivered to the City of Federal Way is accepted "as is" with the
understanding that King County disclaims all warranties for the delivered
equipment. Should the equipment not perform as specified by the vendor, King
County will provide all warranty repair information to the City of Federal Way.
3.
The City of Federal Way is responsible for the exchange of equipment with like
items for proper size, etc. King County will provide all exchange information to
the City of Federal Way.
4.
The City of Federal Way is responsible for all training related to the proper use,
care and maintenance of the delivered equipment.
5.
King County assumes no responsibility for the use, care or maintenance of the
delivered equipment by the City of Federal Way. The City of Federal Way shall
protect, defend, indemnify and save harmless King County, its officers,
employees and agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments and/or awards
of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from the negligent acts or
omissions of King County, its officers, employees, and/or agents. The City of
Federal Way agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph extend to any
claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any of its
employees, or agents. For this purpose, the City of Federal Way, by mutual
negotiation, hereby waives, as respects King County only, any immunity that
would otherwise be available against such claims under the Industrial
Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event that King County incurs
attorney fees and/or costs in the defense of claims, for damages within the
scope of this section, such fees and costs shall be recoverable from the City of
Federal Way. In addition, King County shall be entitled to recover from the City
of Federal Way, fees, and costs incurred to enforce the provisions of this
section.
Page 1 of2
Attachment 0
King County - FFY01 DOJ Equipment Grant
Claims shall include, but not be limited to, assertions that the use or transfer of
any software, book, document, report, film, tape, or sound reproduction or
material of any kind, delivered hereunder, constitutes an infringement of any
copyright, patent, trademark, trade name, and/or otherwise results in unfair
trade practice.
6.
The City of Federal Way shall comply with the Department of Justice Post
Award Requirements, Chapter 6: Property and Equipment, of Grant Award
Number (2002-TE-CO048), Attachment C, copy attached and incorporated by.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
reference as if fully stated herein. Q~~ :~«.:i
~:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:
Paul Tanaka
Jeanne Burbidge
..... ....
Mayor
County Administrative Officer
City of Federal Way
King County
. Date
Date
Page 2 of 2
Attachment E
King County - FFY01 DOJ Equipment Grant
Agency Point of Contact for Delivery
(Must be equipped to accept large pallets of equipment.)
Name: Krista
Osborne
Title:
_Commander
Organization:_Federal Way Police
Department
Shipping Address (cannot be a PO Box): _N/A (Centralized at Seattle Police
Department)
City, State, Zip: _Federal Way, WA
98038
Fax Number:
Phone Number: 253-661-
4600
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 1
Attachment F
King County - FFY01 DOJ Equipment Grant
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HAND RECEIPT
(Date)
Name Cdr. Krista Osborne
Organization: Federal Way Police Department
Address: 34008 9th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the following equipment from the State Domestic
Preparedness Equipment Support Program.
Equipment Item Unit Cost Qty Total Cost Discipline
Category
Personal MSA. Air Purifying Respirator-Advantage $127.6 91 EA. $11,613.4 91)FOR
Protective 1000 Riot. Facepiece -law enforcement. ISTRIBUTION TO
EDERAL WAY
OLiCEAGENCY
MSA, Advantage CBA-RCA canister for $23.6 91 EA. $2,150.3 91) FOR
APR, used for ehemlbio and riot control. ISTRIBUTION TO
Pkg. of 6 EDERAL WAY
OLiCE AGENCY
ehiele Kit consisting of:1 ea. BIC Suit, $79.7 41 $3,268.5 41)FOR
1 pro DSC Latex Booties, 1 pr AnseU Nitrile ISTRIBUTION TO
loves, 1 ea. Roll Chem-Tape, 1 ea. EDERAL WAY
Chem/Bio Filter Cannister POLICE AGENCY
Total Jurisdictional Value of Equipment: $17,032.2i
We understand this is a one-time grant and, as such, the final sub-recipient is
responsible for the maintenance, training, and proper storage of the equipment.
Equipment lost, stolen, or unrepairable will not be replaced. We also hold the
Department of Justice, the Washington State Military Department and King County
harmless for any and all damages that may result from the acceptance of this equipment,
including data loss.
Signed by:
Title:
Telephone:
Date:
Page 1 of 1
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2002
ITEM#
:::IT rJ / )
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG); Request Approval to Accept the Award
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
)( CONSENT
~ RESOLUTION
D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
D ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: The Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety memo ¡¡-om Chief Kirkpatrick on the
2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG); Request Approval to Accept the Award, and a Draft Resolution.
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Since our commencement in October 1996, the Department of Public Safety has
had the good fortune to benefit from several LLEBG awards administered by the Bureau of Justice Assistance
(BJA). Once again, I am pleased to announce that we haye been granted the 2002 LLEBG award in the amount
of$67,013.00.
BJA earmarked $67,013.00 for the City of Federal Way with a local match of $7,446.00. Our local match was
identified as 2001 Department sayings and carried-forward to FY 2002. The total award is $74,459.00 and is
for a two-year period.
The Department of Public Safety's objective is to purchase video cameras and/or other equipment as identified,
such as Tasers. The yideo cameras would mount to the dashboards of patrol yehicles. This strategy will
proyide additional community safety by incorporating technology to gain the maximum adyantages for law
enforcement. This award will proyide the means needed to equip the Federal Way Police Officers with
innoyatiye resources to accomplish this goal.
If the Grant is used for the video cameras it is a pilot project and at the end of the pilot program the City will
eyaluate whether it wants to continue and will budget the M&O and replacement funds in future budget
considerations.
Currently, we are researching the cost to deyelop this program and will proyide the completed budget to Parks,
Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee on September 9, 2002 to forward to City
Council on September 17, 2002.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: to accept award the
federal amount of $67,013.00 and local match in the amount of $7,446.00, for a total award amount of
$74,459.00 and approyal for purchasing authority regarding the equipment referenced aboye or other equipment
as identified.
PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG); Request
Approval to Accept the Award, and the Resolution.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
....~...
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D APPROVED
D DENIED
D TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
DßAFT
7/~/o ~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING
ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2002 LOCAL LAW ENFORCMENT
BLOCK GRANT.
WHEREAS, the Bureau Justice Assistance grants Local Law Enforcement Block
Grants to local law enforcement jurisdictions for the purpose of enhancing law enforcement in the
community; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, Department of Public Safety, has receiyed a
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) grant each year since 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way, Department of Public Safety, applied for a
LLEBG grant in 2002 for the purpose of providing cameras to be mounted on the dashboard in patrol
vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the Bureau of Justice Assistance notified the City on June 25, 2002, that
it has been awarded a LLEBG grant in the amount of Sixty-Seven Thousand Thirteen and 00/100
Dollars ($67,013.00); and
WHEREAS, in order to receive the monies in the LLEBG grant the City must provide
matching funds ofSeyen Thousand Four Hundred Forty-Six and 00/100 Dollars ($7,446.00), and the
City Council must authorize acceptance of the grant by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City, Department of Public Safety, must notifY the Bureau Justice
Assistance of its intent to accept the LLEBG grant by September 24, 2002.
Res.#_,Pagel
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Notification of Acceptance of the 2002 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant.
The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to notify the Bureau Justice
Assistance that the City of Federal Way accepts the 2002 LLEBG for the purpose of providing
cameras to be mounted on the dashboard in patrol vehicles and/or for the purpose of purchasing
other equipment as identified, such as Tasers.
Section 2. Receipt ofLLEBG Funds.
The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to receiye the LLEBG funds of Sixty-
Seyen Thousand Thirteen and 00/100 Dollars ($67,013.00).
Section 3. Matching Funds Authorized. Pursuant to the terms of the LLEBG grant, the City
commits approximately Seyen Thousand Four Hundred Forty-Six and 00/100 Dollars ($7,446.00), in
matching funds for the purpose of providing cameras to be mounted on the dashboard in patrol
vehicles.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase ofthis resolution.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date
ofthe resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effectiye Date. This resolution shall be effectiye immediately upon passage by the
Federal Way City Council.
Res. #_, Page 2
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, THIS - DAY OF
,2002.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY,
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
K: IReso ¡ u Ii on \Po Ii ce- 2002 Local La w En f 0 rc e men tB ¡ 0<: kG"m'
Res. #_, Page 3
MEETING DATE:
August 20, 2002
ITEM#
.:IZL
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Portion of South 316th Street Vacation Request
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
0
~
0
CONSENT
RESOLUTION
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
~ PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and Staff Report to the Land Use/Transportation Committee Dated June 25, 2002 (attached as
Exhibit "A")
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
The Federal Way School District has petitioned the City to vacate a portion of South 316'h Street (6'h Avenue S to 8th Avenue S)
abutting the southern boundary of Mirror Lake Elementary School property (see Exhibit B of the attached Staff Report for exact
location). The area requested for vacation is unopened right-of-way that has been maintained by the school district. The right-of-way
width for tIlls portion of S 316th Street is trurty (30) feet wide, which abuts the school property along its entire southern border. The
City's Comprehensive Plan does not show a proposed future street at this location. The areas in which the right-of-way is located are
zoned Residential 7.2 and are listed as single family, high density in the Comprehensive Plan. The street vacation is being sought as
part ofa plan to improve the safety of school bus circulations, and provide separation of buses and student drop off through the school
property, and to provide additional parking area. The portion ofS 3l6th Street to be vacated has eleven (11) abutting landowners, in
addition to the School District, of wruch the School district has collected 7 signatures (70% of property frontage abutting street), the
city code require that the street vacation petition shall be signed by owner of more than two- third (66%) of the private property
abutting upon the part of the street or alley sought to be vacation. Vacating the requested area of right-of-way will not interfere with
the current or future function of the City streets system.
The petitioners have met all the applicable mandatory criteria, as well as the discretionary criteria set forth in FWCC Section 13-102
required for granting the vacation request. Please see the attached staff report for further details.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
At its July I, 2002 meeting, the Land Userrransportation Committee recommended approval of the Resolution to set the date and time
of a public hearing to be at the August 20, 2002 City Council meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION:
'~I_~()~:!£J:'~()~~-()!~~:s()lu_ti()I1_!()~i1:ecttheCity Attorney t°J'r_~"!~!I1_Q~inaI1ce ,:~~~~in~"-J:'_()r:ti.°n- of~outh3l6th Street." -
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0
0
0
0
APPROVED
DENIED
TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
MSodl
k,\<o~d"gdbill'I2()()2Ipon;00 oh "6th ,!reo! ""';00 req""'d,,,
RESOLUTION NO.
DRAFT
cf/(:5/ð~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, GRANTING A PETITION
FOR VACATING A PORTION OF SOUTH 316th STREET,
ABUTTING THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF MIRROR
LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
WHEREAS, a yalid petition has been filed by the owners of at least two-thirds of the
abutting property requesting vacation of a portion of South 3l6th Street, abutting the southern
boundary of Mirror Lake Elementary school; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 02-367, the Federal Way City Council held a
public hearing at its regular meeting on August 20, 2002 to consider the petition for vacation as
required by state law and Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 13-102; and
WHEREAS, following the conclusion ofthe public hearing on August 20, 2002, the
City Council determined that the proposed yacation complies with the vacation criteria specified in
FWCC Section 13-102, as detailed in the staff report prepared by John Mulkey, Street Systems
Engineer, dated June 25, 2002 and attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to state law and FWCC § 13-102, the City may require the
owners of the property abutting the street or alley to compensate the City in an amount that does not
exceed the full appraised value of the area vacated; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to FWCC § 13-102, the City may reserve an easement for the
construction, repair and maintenance of public utilities and services and may impose such other
conditions or limitations as it deems necessary and proper to preserve any desired public use or
benefit; and
RES #
,PAGE I
WHEREAS, in order to ensure payment to the City ofthe appraised fair market value
ofthe right-of-way to be vacated and to ensure that easements have been granted across the property
for all affected utilities, the Council wishes to defer adoption of an ordinance effectuating the
vacation until the payment has been made and the easements granted;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council finds that the Petitioners'
request for a street vacation meets the criteria required in FWCC § 13-102- In support of this
finding, the Council adopts and incorporates by reference the findings and conclusions of the staff
report attached as Exhibit A.
Section 2. Petition Granted- The petition for vacation ofthe right of way identified
in Exhibit B is hereby granted, subject to the adoption of a street vacation ordinance as required by
FWCC § 13-103. The Council reserves the right to reconsider its granting of the Petition until the
effectiye date of the street vacation ordinance identified in Section 3 herein.
Section 3. Preparation of Ordinance. The City Attorney is directed to prepare an
ordinance for the street vacation identified in Section 2 herein. The City Attorney shall prepare and
submit the ordinance for adoption upon the satisfaction of the following conditions:
A.
Utility easements haye been granted to all existing utilities within the right-of-
way area to be vacated.
B.
The owners of the abutting property haye paid the City the appraised fair
market value of the right-of-way to be yacated-
Section 4- Seyerabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase ofthis resolution
RES #
,PAGE 2
should be held inyalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this resolution.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effectiye date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed-
Section 6- Effective Da~.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
passage by the Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Federal Way this
day of
,2002.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N- CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY,
PATRICIA A- RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
K:l!\esolution\South3 I 6thStreetYacation
RES #
,PAGE 3
EXHIBIT "A"
City of Federal Way
STAFF REPORT
TO THE LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
PETITION FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF SOUTH 316TH STREET
Federal Way File No. 02-1O1347-000-00-SV
DATE:
June 25, 2002
PROPOSED ACTION:
Petition for vacation of a portion of Soutlr 316"0 Street
PETITIONER:
Federal Way School District, No. 210
LOCATION:
Next to Mirror Lake Elementary School
REPORT PREPARED BY:
John Mulkey, Street Systems Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Street Vacation Request
I.
BACKGROUND
Federal Way School District has petitioned the City to vacate a portion of South 3 16th Street, abutting the southern
boundary of Mirror Lake Elementary School property (See Street Vacation Petition (Exhibits A), the vicinity map
(Exhibit B), and S 316'" Street legal description (ExhibitsC) for exact location.) The area requested for vacation
is unopened right-<>f-waythat has been maintained by the school district. The right-<>f-way width, for South 3 16th
Street is thirty (30) feet, which abuts the school property along its entire southern border. There is no ultimate
roadway section for S 316'" Street's Right-<>f-way, shown in the City's comprehensive Plan. The area in which the
Right-<>f-way area is located is zoned Residential 7.2 and is listed as single family, High Density in the
Comprehensiye Plan. The street vacation is being sought as part of a plan to improve the safety of bus flow,
through the school property and add parking because the current configuration has been detennined to be unsafe.
The area to be vacated on S 316 Street has eleven (11) abutting landowners, in addition to the School District, of
which the School district has collected 7 signatures.
Vacating the requested area ofright-<>f-waywould not interfere with the current or future function of City streets,
would improye the safety of bus traffic through the school property, add parking for staff and parents. The school
district petitioned for a street vacation fora portion of 8th Ayenue South area in 1994 for a similar project, but did
not complete the required process.
II.
COMPLIANCE WITH CRITERIA DESCRIBED IN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CODE
(FWCC) SECTION 13-102
A. Mandatory Criteria:
The following criteria are mandatory and must be met before a petition for a street vacation may be approyed:
Criteria #Ia
- Tire vacatiol/ provides a public bel/efit or is for a public bel/efiL Tire bel/efit may iI/elude
ecol/omic or busitless support tlrat tire colllmtlllity as a wlrole derives from tlte abuttil/g
property owl/er.
Mirror Lake Elementary School
Street Vacation Staff Report
It was detennined in a study, dated February 8, 1994, by Mirror Lake Elementary Schools Neighborhood Safety
Committee, their Community Service and Security Officers, and a City representative that the current
configuration of the parking lot and bus loop area for this school is unsafe, as bus and car traffic are not separated.
The vacation ofa portion of South 316th Street will allow the school district to separate the bus and car traffic and
increase the parking area, so that students may be dropped off within the school property without disrupting bus
traffic flow.
Criteria#lb
- The street, alley or portion thereof is 110 longer required for public use.
The area encompasses unopened right-of-way, which has not been used for access, and is only thirty (30) feet in
width. South 3 16th Street cannot be extended to the east because of an existing house and an extension to the west
would place the intersection with 6'h Ayenue South too close to the existing intersection of South 3 16th Place and
6th Avenue South. This area was conyeyed to King County by the school district in 1960.
Criteria #Ic
- The vacation does not abut a body of water, such as a river, a lake, orsa/twater, exceptfora
public putpose such as a park or port facility and which reverts 10 a public authority.
This right-of-way is not located in the vicinity of a body of water, therefore this criteria is not applicable.
B. Discretionary Criteria:
Compliance with the following criteria is not mandatory, but the Council must consider them in making its
decision.
Criteria #2a
- The vacation meets the intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan's general purposes and
objectives.
The City's Comprehensive Plan has no requirements for future roads in the locations proposed for vacation- The
area in which the right-of-way is located is zoned Residential 7.2 and is listed as single family, High Density in the
Comprehensive Plan. The vacation of a portion of South 3 16th Street does not interfere with the purpose or
objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Criteria #2b
- The vacatiotl provides for an exchange of public property in the public interest.
There is no exchange of public property associated with this yacation petition.
Criteria #2c
- Whether conditions may so challge in the future as to provide a greater use or need than
presently exists.
The only condition that could arise is redevelopment of the school parcel. If this were to occur, all appropriate
conditions, including new rights-of-way would be dedicated at that time.
Criteria #2d
- Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property
(exclusive ofpetitionelS) abutting the same.
At this time the City has received no objections to this vacation request.
Criteria #2e
- The vacation would not inteifere with future development or access to other existing or
future developments.
2
r.
Mirror Lake Elementary School
Street Vacation Staff Report
Because the properties abutting the proposed area for yacation are already developed, no existing or future
development would be de¡lied access as a result of the proposed vacation. Existing utilities, including water,
sewer, gas, overhead power, and telephone, must be either relocated or granted an easement through the property
before vacation is allowed. .
III.
RECOMMENDA nON
All criteria as set forth in FWCC Section 13-102 for granting a street vacation have been met. As per RCW
35.79.030, because the property has been part of a dedicated public right of way for over twenry fiye (25) years,
the full amount of the appraised yalue (based on an appraisal acceptable to the City) of the land will be required as
payment to the City. Staff recommends the petition for street vacation of a portion of South 316'" Street be
approyed, under the condition that the above noted utilities are either relocated or granted easements through the
property.
klstreetslstreetvacatioo\núrror lake clcmenta')lstaffreport.doc
3
-_.: __0~~.3/~2_.~!!.."-"-;..~."-!'~"'...~.9.6 !,_~_0220 SHORETr-KHS-APP-SVC
JUH-,..-Ø'" FRX .., ,......> jxu- PEHHXHCTOH '.-', ...,.,. ...-;....
"-
~OO2
.P. 0'"
06/ LO/02
"ON U'H FA:1< 20. 205 0220
SIlORBTr-K"S-APP-SVC
.~OOZ
Applic..nt,
Name: _Fede...¡ Way School DÍ$<ric< .:no
Address: _c/o Mike Cø.rlisle
Federal Way Sc(1001 District
1066 S, 3"oth
Federal Way. WA q6003
253 94~ 2000 , mcarilsl"'fwsd wpd~
Phone:
STRJ,ET and/or ALLEY VACATION and PETITION
Dear Mayor and Federa]. Way City Council:
"..., e. the undersigned abutting property owners. hereby respectfully.equest that certaio unimproved
street right-of-way herebybe vacated. Generallydescribedas that portion ofS- 316'" Street lying south
of thc Mirror Lake Elcmentary School-
Lee:al De."cript:ion
The South 30 of the southeast quartcr of the noc<heast quarter of the southwest quutcr of Section
8, Township:U North. Range 4 East. W.M. in the City of Fedccal Way. King County.
Washington. Excc--pt for the west 30 feet thereof.
Brief Statement 'Vhv Vacation.... Bcine: Sought
Revision of the Mirror Lake Elementary School bus loop and parking lot.
~...-<l At1:achmeny,;
a Verification as to o",ncrshi¡:> in the form of a Preliminary Commitment for 'U.tle Insurance
a
Corporatlon/Partnetshlp (if applicable): Attached
a Attach a color-coded. map of a scale not less than 1" - 2.00' of the area sought for vacation-
"Note: Map mu:;t correspood ....i.th legal description.
a
APl?lication fe<o
AbuUing Property Ovvners'
Signatures and A.ddresses
--(.-,~"t: ,:5 h.,~""
....~.;;eI- D....n-&Timothy~Jt Shupien
31614 6'" Ave S. Federal Wayq8003
~n~~-
Tax):.ot"
):.ot, Block & PlaVSec. "X'wn. RG
PARCEL #794170 0010
LOT 1, SPRINGWOOD PARK"3
PARCEL "794160 0080
LOT 8, SPRlNG"VOOD PARK
"2.
.Angelo Boerl
6~1.%~~
~J. & ~ R Pennington
616 S 316'" PI. Federal ""ay q8003
- .-'i(:-....,..,~~ ~^-4-c:;.h"~
{~¿¿ <'.. d-r¿..'<l.(J.-.~
Rebecca J. Goff& StevenP- Nesdore
620 S 316'" PI. Pede,'al Way 98003
PARCEL #794160 0070
LOT 7. S.PRlNGWOOD PARK
#2.
PARCEL #794160 0060
LOT 6, SPRINGWOOD PARK
#'"
PARCEL #794"50 0060
LOT 6, SPRINGWOOD PARK
#1
M K Harmon
31610 7'" PI S. Federal ""ay 98003
~ :? n¡ ~tAe:?2::::::>
8"-::.1 .:TÞ;q,J ~
o.Iao. "tl, & Ronnie Le<: Mccracken
:'11611 "", Ave So. Federal Way 98003 ~
PARCEL #794150 0070
LOT 7, SPRINGWOOD PARK
il1
"-.,'
Treasurer's Receipt No,
Treasurer's Receipt No,
Treasurer's Receipt No.
Date:
Date:
Michael C. PeterSon
31600 '7'" AveS., Federal Way 98003
Kevin A. & Cindy M. Hildebrandt
316147'" Place So. Federal Way 98003
Fee Paid
Appraisal Fee Paid
Land Value Paid
Deed Accepted
Trade Accepted
K,ISTREETS\ROW\V=cion P=",doo
13e.t\~ M. Flnrt-:>
31513 g.¡l....Ave-~, fü.\Lrol oJ"'l
,/800?,
PARCEL #794160 0050
LOT 5, SPRINGWOOD PARK
#2
PARCEL #794150 0080
LOT 8,SPRINGWOOD PARK
#1
PARCEL #794150 0050
LOT 5, SPRINGWOOD PARK
#1
par<.e.\ Æ:- ß6<2'bOO OOrfi
ß LK 3 LoT ~ TEe.p.aGENE .+01)
.-r...--.----.
.____-"_6/13/02 - TI(!!_.~"-;-~-~--.E"'>;:_.J'.6_6 ~ :220 SnORETT-KHS-APP-SYC
JUH-14-02 FRI 11,44 AM-JILL PEHHIHCTOH ~b1 4T9 46e~
1lI002
P.02
a./La/02
"ON 2'.' 61 fAX 20. 205 0220
SKORETr-K"S-APP-SYC
~aO2
Applicø.nt,
Name: _Fedc<d Way School Dt.',.;et ":no
A<!dre6S' _efa Mike Ca.rli.sle
Federal Way School District
1066 S- 320th
Federal Way, WA 96003
253 94< 2000 ( mc.rtlsl"'fwsd ~.d~
Phone:
STRUET and/oi' ALLEY VACATION and PETITION
Dear Mayor and FederaJ. Way City Council:
""'le, the undersigo"d abutting property owners, hereby resp"ctfully request that certain unimproved
street right-of-way hereby be vacated- Generallydescribedns thnt portion of S. 316'" Street lying south
of the Mirror Lake Elementary School.
Le..-al DescrwHon
The South 30 of the southeast quartcr of the norchc"st quartcr of the southwest quarter of Section
8, Township:U North. Rangc 4 EaSt, W.M. in the City of Federal Way. King County.
Washington. Ex=pt for the west 30 foet thereof.
Brier Statement Vllhv Vaea1:ion is Rein..- Sought
Revision oftehe ~1irror L<>.ke Elementary School bus loop and parlùng lot-
E&..<DJ.it:ed Atú1ehmen<:s,
a
Vedfication as to o....nership in the form of a Preliminary CommItment for TItle Insurance
a
Corporation/Partnership (if applicable): Attached
a
Attach.. color-codeå. map of a scale not less than ," = 2.00' of the area sought for vacation-
-Note: Map muBt correspond ",;ith legal description-
a
AP1?lication fee
Abutting Property Owners'
Signatures and Addresses
Tax Lot II
Lot, Black Be Plat/Sec- -r...m. RG
--(..(~~t ,:S k.~"-I
,'....;.:laDð."n BcTImoth.J'~gJtShupien
31614 6" Ave S. Federal Way <>8003
~n~~-
PARCEL #794~70 0010
LOT 1, SPRINGWOOD PARK "'3
PARCEL #794160 0080
LOT 6, SPRlNGvVOOD PARK
#2
Axtgelo Boer!
~l..~~~
J- & ~ R Pennington
616 S ~16" PI, Federal 'Way 98003
.. _.5f-iL,..<-;;;~ '7^-~=-""'--<:""'"
,~..{¿ """ d-r}jYI4---~
Rebecca J. Goff&StevenP- Nesdore
62.0 S 316'" Pl. Federal Way 98003
PARCEL "794160 0070
LOT 7. S.PRINGWOOD PARK
.."
PARCEL #794160 0060
LOT 6, SPlUNGWOOD PARK
#2.
PARCEL #794150 0060
LOT 6, SPRINGWOOD PARK
#1
M K Hannon
316107'" PI S, Federal ",ray 98003
-Q.:;;::t=¡ ~ YŸ\ ~~~
l6e--if:k .:rp;qi) =?
.Ja<> _Ll, & Ronnie Lee Mccracken .
3,6117'" Ave S., Federal Way 96003 ~
PARCEL "'7941500070
LOT 7, SPRINGWOOD PARK
It,
3:
200 0 200 400 600 800 Feet
rvo..--~
MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY
STREET VACATION
N
W+E
Mo. .""0..,)"' 2S 2002
EXHIBIT B
Federal Way
CityMap
Na/e, Th;s map;s ;n/en/ed ta, use as a g,aphicaf ,ewesen/afion only.
The C"y a/ Fede",/ Way makes na wa<ran/yas fa "s accu,acy.
<,> ,,0
. ,.",
e
?'
",@ vi
Q) ,
) ,
<í¡
I
-.,.,
~'
~
.q l-
I@
'.9
~ ~
"> ~
,
PROPOSED STREET VACA nON EXHIBIT
PORTION _OF SOUTH 316th STREET
I~
Û}
NOT TO SCALE
"IL ~.
1 v.;. 16 <", ,
m::- ' '~;,';{ ~
S314T~,ST ...
,'0 '
:-;; ,,-"
¡:: I~.
QJt
,r'.-rr
3' "
A... r.r<
"'.>5
~
~
:!.,
,
,
AREA TD BE
VACATE Þ
I:AVID EVANS
ANDASSOCIATES INC-
3700 Pacific Hwy- East, Suite 311
Tacoma Washington 98424
Phone: 253-922_9780
s.
314 H
--.
-.0,.
",,:~
- 0'
:-
30'
: ~
vi; 2
ui
,r:-"
g-' (Y
,. ~.
1"<' ~ ~,
,'- ",0 -
"
.<.J
~ . ¿
, .
,,)~
,.- -,"
Petition for Street Vacation - Portion of South 316th Street
Legal Description
The south 30 feet of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of
Section 8, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in the City of Federal Way, King
County, Washington. Except the west 30 feet thereof.
Situate in the City of Federal Way, King County, Washington.
Description prepared for Federal Way School District #2 I 0
By Darrell Plein, June 19,2002.
MEETING DATE:
August 20, 2002
ITEM# JZ2l( t:t:.)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Gambling Tax Ordinance Code Amendment
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
0 CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
~ ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to Finance, Economic Deyelopment and Regional Affairs Committee dated July 16,
2002
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The State Legislature modified Chapter 9.46.110 of the Revised Code of Washington to
reduce the percentage amount of gambling tax on bingo and raffles from 10% to 5%. This legislation became effectiye on
January 1,2000. This proposed amendment to Federal Way City Code will bring the City of Federal Way into
compliance with RCW 9.46.110. There has been no bingo or raffle actiyity in the period from January 1, 2000 to present.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward the proposed change in gambling tax rate on bingo
and raffles from 10% to 5% to full Council for approyal at the August 20, 2002 Council Meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move the proposed ordinance to second reading and approyal at the next regular meeting on
September 17,2002"
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~------------ -
- ----..------------
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
3ðl
REVISED - 05/10/2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
July 16, 2002
To: Finance, Economic D velopment and Regional Affairs Committee
Via: David H. osel, anager
From: /(fl7%ichael Olson, anagement Services Deputy Director
Subject: Gambling Tax Reduction on bingo and rajjlesfrom 10% to 5%
Backflround:
The State Legislature modified Chapter 9.46.110 ofthe Revised Code of Washington to
reduce the percentage amount of gambling tax on bingo and raffles from 10% to 5%. This
legislation became effective on January I, 2000. This proposed amendment to Federal Way
City Code will bring the City of Federal Way into compliance with RCW 9.46.110. There
has been no bingo or raffle actiyity in the period ¡¡-om January I, 2000 to present.
FEDRAC Committee Action:
Forward the proposed change in gambling tax rate on bingo and raffles ¡¡-om 10% to 5% to
full Council for approval at the August 20, 2002 Council Meeting.
/5(¡ . /
~~V
f14/ð 6aks
K,'V"^MÙ' >I)uc ""tNIl
])1-
ORDINANCE NO.
DRAFT
~/;>/ß2-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL
WAY CITY CODE CHAPTER 14, SECTION 14-144,
REGARDING THE TAX RATE ON BINGO AND RAFFLES
(AMENDS ORDINANCES 90-15, 90-44, 91-101, 96-268, 96-279,
97-286, 97-301 and 98-329)
WHEREAS, the State Legislature modified Chapter 9.46.11 0 of the Revised Code of
Washington to reduce the percentage amount of local taxation on bingo and raffles; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the taxation rate for bingo and
raffles should be reduced in order to comply with RCW 9.46.110 and as hereinafter amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 14, Article IV, Section 14-144 is hereby amended as follows:
14-144 Tax on gambling actiYities.
(a) In accordance with RCW 9.46.110, there is leyied upon all persons a tax on eyery gambling
actiyity permitted by this diyision at the following rates:
(1) Any bingo or raffle activity shall be taxed at a rate of M2 percent ofthe gross receipts trom ,
a bingo game or raffle less the amount awarded as cash or merchandise prizes;
(2) An amusement game shall be taxed only at a rate sufficient to pay the actual costs of
enforcement of the proyisions of this diyislOn and Chapter 9.46 RCW and such taxation shall not
exceed two percent of the sum of the gross receipts from the amusement game Jess the amount
awarded as prizes;
ORt) # ------. PAulo I
17.3
(3) Any pullchboard or pull-tab activity for bona fide charitab]e or nonprofit organizations shan
be at a rate ofiO percent on gross receipts from the operation of the games less the amount awarded
as cash or merchandise prizes. Taxation of punchboards or pull-tabs for commercial stimulant
operators shall be at a rate of fiye percent on gross receipts fTom the operation of the games;
(4) Any social card game at a rate of20 percent of the annual gross receipts;
(5) Fund-rasing activities at the applicable rates specified above.
Provided, no tax shall be imposed pursuant to this section on bingo, amusement games or fund-
raising actiyities when such activities or any combination thereof are conducted by a bona fide
charitable or nonprofit organization as defined in RCW 9.46.0209, which organization has not paid
operating or management personnel and has gross receipts fTom bingo, amusement games, or fund-
raising actiyities or any combination thereof not exceeding $5,000 per year less the amount awarded
as cash or merchandise prizes. No tax shall be imposed on the first $10,000 of gross receipts less the
amount awarded as cash or merchandise prizes fTom raffles conducted by any bona fide or charitable
organization.
(b) The city clerk is instructed and authorized to adopt appr~priate reporting requirements, to ensure
the effective administration oflicense holders exempt from the payment of such tax.
Section 2. Seyerabilitv. The proyisions ofthis ordinance are declared separate and
seyerable. The inyalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion ofthis
ordinance or the inyalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect
the yalidity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the yalidity of its application to other persons or
circumstances.
ORDn
.PAUE2
])1
Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinancc shall take effect and be in forcc five (5)
days /Tom and after its passage and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this
,20_.
day of
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK.
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
K,\ORDINlG,mbll"g ", bl"go "10070102
R"¡,,J 2,5i02
ORO#
PACJ!i 3
1)s
MEETING DATE:
August 20, 2002
ITEM#
\í7( (ß-:-J
....................-....-.....-.-....-..--...-.--..--.-..............-..-............--.--.....-..--...-.-.........
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSITIONAL HOUSING UNIT CODE AMENDMENT
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
0
0
D
CONSENT
RESOLUTION
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
~ ORDINANCE
D PUBLIC HEARING
D OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
ATTACHMENTS: (1) Draft Ordinance to approve the Code Amendment; and (2) July 30, 2002 Memorandum to the
Land Useffransportation Committee (LUTe) /Planning Commission Recommendation with Exhibit 1 - Staff Report to
the Planning Commission for the meeting of July 17,2002, and Exhibit 2 - July 17, 2002 Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way adopted code provisions for Social Services Transitional
Housing units in a 1994 code amendment. Units can be established in RS, RM, BN, BC and CC-F zoning districts subject
to specific criteria. The 1,000 foot separation requirement has proved difficult to the establishment of additional social
services transitional housing units. Staff researched the issue and presented five options for modifying the 1,000 foot
separation requirement to the Planning Commission at its July 17, 2002 public meeting. The Planning Commission voted
to recommend to the LUTC and City Council Option C which reduced the separation requirement to 400 feet only in the
RM zoning district.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On August 5, 2002, the Land Use and Transportation
Committee yoted to recommend approyal of option E as amended: Eliminate the 1,000 foot separation requirement only
in the RM zoning district, provided that no less than one (1) unit and no more than five (5) percent of the housing units in
the Multifamily complex may be social services transitional housing units.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye the proposed ordinance to second reading and approyal at the next regular meeting on
September J, 2002"
/7
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
....~_......................_--........--._---.....--_.._-_...--.._....---.....
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
D
D
APPROVED
DENIED
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
3éJ;<
D T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/1 0/2001
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DRAFT
/r/7/62---
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 22 SECTION 22-
669.5 BY REDUCING SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS
FOR SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
UNITS.
WHEREAS, amendments to the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) text are
authorized pursuant to FWCC section 22-216 pursuant to process VI review; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way City Council has considered a proposed
change to the FWCC to reduce the separation requirement for Social Services Transitional
Housing Units (Proposal); and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council, pursuant to FWCC section 22-517,
having determined the Proposal to be worthy of legislative consideration, referred the Proposal
to the Federal Way Planning Commission for its review and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way Planning Commission, haying considered the
proposal at a Public Hearing on July 17, 2002, pursuant to FWCC section 22-534, and all
public notice having been given pursuant to FWCC section 22-521; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the Planning Commission submitted
to the Land Use and Transportation City Council Committee its recommendation in favor of
the staff recommendation to reduce the setback requirement for Social Services Transitional
Ord. #_, Page I
DRAFT
Housing Units from 1,000 feet to 400 feet only in the Multifamily Residential (RM) zoning
district; and
WHEREAS, an environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for
the Proposal on May 4, 2002, and no comments were receiyed; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way Land Use and Transportation City Council Committee,
on August 5, 2002, considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and voted to
modify the recommendation to the full City Council such that the recommendation is to
eliminate the 1,000 foot separation requirement only in the RM zoning district, provided
howeyer that no less than one unit and no more than five percent of the housing in the
multifamily complex may be social services transitional housing units; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the proposal at its August 20,2002 meeting;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the
following findings with respect to the Proposal and the proposed amendment to the Federal
Way City Code (FWCC):
A. The City of Federal Way adopted the Social Services Transitional Housing
code provisions in a 1994 code amendment, permitting the use in the Single Family
Residential (RS), Multifamily Residential (RM), Neighborhood Business (BN),
Community Business (BC) and City Center - Frame (CC-F) zoning districts. There are
specific criteria that each application must meet before approval.
Ord. #_, Page 2
B. The separation requirement that requires the use be distanced at least 1,000
from any other facility in this classification has proved to be difficult to the
establishment of additional social services transitional housing units in the RM zoning
district according to the current known provider.
C. Staff analyzed five options for modification to the social services transitional
housing unit separation requirement and proposed that the separation requirement be
modified to 400 feet only in RM zoning districts.
D. At a public meeting, the City Council Land Use and Transportation
Committee heard testimony that the separation requirement should be further reduced to
proyide additional opportunities for social services transitional housing units in existing
multifamily complexes, and voted to recommend that the separation requirement be
eliminated in RM zoning subject to certain criteria.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC section 22-216 and 528, and based
upon the Findings set forth in Section I, the Federal Way City Council makes the following
Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the
proposal:
1.
The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with, and substantially
implements, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUG 3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods.
LUP15 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses.
HP40
Continue to permit emergency and transitiorull homeless facilities
within the city.
Ord. #_, Page 3
HP34
Remove existing regulatory barriers to siting special needs housing to
avoid concentration and to ensure uniform distribution throughout all
residential and mixed-use zones, subject to peiformance standards that
protect residential amenity, ensure proper access, and maintain design
standards.
HP37
Ensure that access to special needs housing is provided without
discrimination.
HP41
Emergency shelters and transitional housing should be regulated to
avoid concentration of facilities, mitigate impacts on surrounding uses,
ensure that such housing is properly managed, and avoid significant
impacts on existing residential neighborhoods.
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or
welfare as the proposed FWCC text amendment permits the establishment of additional
transitional housing units, which have a direct relationship to the public health, safety,
and welfare of the homeless in Federal Way while maintaining regulatory standards;
and
3.
The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the residents of the city because
the proposed FWCC text amendment maintains separation requirements for social
services transitional housing units yet ensures opportunities for transitional housing,
which are in the best interest of the residents of the city.
Section 3. Amendment. FWCC section 22 is amended as set forth in the
attached Exhibit A.
Section 4. Seyerability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate
and seyerable. The inyalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or
portion of the ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of
its application to any other persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effectiye date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Ord. #_, Page 4
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after
passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the
day of
,2002.
APPROVED
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N- CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERIC
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE No:
Ord. #_, Page 5
DR4Fì
this section'
22-669.5 Social service transitional housing.
The following uses shall be permitted in the single family multifamily residential (RM) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in
USE ZONE CHART
~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. THEN, across for REGULATIONS
0 Minimums Maximums
~ Required Yards
....¡
;:;
'-'
"'
0:
USE
Social
Services
Transitional
Housing
TypeAOR
TypeB
g
]~
g.."
~~
e
"'
1
.g
¡;;
Ñ
Vi
.3
Process 7,200120ftI5ft.-m.
III sq. ft.
Pmee" I, II, III ood IV", d",ribed To
§§ 22-351 - 22-356,
22-361 - 22-370
22-386-22-411,
22-431 - 22-460-,"pootivoly.
8
~
~
ð H
õ .~ S
....¡ ;,:",
60% InRM3.6
and 2.4
zones. 30 ft.
above
average
building
elevation. In
RM 1.8 zone,
35 ft. above
average
building
elevation
See note 4
I
Detennined
on a case-
by-case
basis.
g
!!~
H
"'..
ZONE
RM
SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES
1. Tbe city may pennit Ibese uses only if:
a. Tb, fa¡;ili~ i, di,tanced at 1"'1 1,QOQ ft. Hem an)' ollter f..iIi~ uRder Ibi, çl""ifioatioR. A minimum of one
unit and no more Iban five DereenI of Ibe units in Ibe mDlIifamilv complex mav be social services transiIional
bousin. units.
b. The facility and program secures and maintains all licenses andlor approvals as required by Ibe slate.
c. The subject property is situated in close proximity 10. and has convenient access to, public transporIaIion,
shopping, healIh care providers, and oilier services and facilities frequenIly utilized by Ibe residents oflbe property.
d. The program will be operated under the aulbority ofa reputable governing board, social service. or govemmenI
agency, or proprietor, to whom stalf are responsible and who will be available to city officials, if necessary. to
resolve concerns pertaining to the facility.
e. The facility will have staffing supervision. ood security arrangements appropriate to Ibe number of clients and
to its hams of operation.
f The facility will not create unreasonable impacts on tmffic, public utilities and services or on nearby residences.
g. The facility has adequate olf-street parking ood the appearance confonns wilb the character of surrounding
uses.
h. The facility is in compliance wilb applicable health, fire, building, and safety requirements.
i. The facility will operate under a wrirten management plan, approved by the governing agency, board, Ot
official, which must meet administrative standards, specifications, and requirements, which shall be adopted by the
director of community development services, and which shall be on file in Ibe city clerk's office, and which shall be
followed and have the full force and elfect as iflbey were set forth in full in this article.
2. The city will detennine Ibe number of dwelling units or occupancy rooms or suites pennitted in Ibe proposed
development based on Ibe following criteria:
a. The specific nature of the occupancy and Ibe persons Ibat will be housed in Ibe proposed development.
b. The size oflbe dwelling units or occupancy rooms or suites and the specific configuration oflbe facilities
within these units, rooms, or suites.
c. The impacts on nearby residential uses oflbe proposed development.
d. The architecture, site design. ood oilier design features of the proposed development.
(Continued on next page)
L- Fo,otho< info="ioo ,bo", p"king ood p"kiog "'~, '" §22-1376 "s",.
Fo,d,"i!' ofwh" m,y "",d thi, h<ighl limit, "" § 22-1046 ,t "".
Forde"iI"'g.-diogceqoiredy"d" ,eo §22-I 131 ""q.
22-669.5 Social service transitional housing. (Continued)
~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. . . THEN, across for REGULATIONS
0 Minimums Maximums
~ Required Yards
",¡
;:;¡
"
'"
"
USE
¡¡
-0£
.~.~
~~
£
1
"
-0
Vi
"
N
¡;¡
:§
Pmeess I, ll,m and IV are de"ribedi.n
§§ 22-J5I - 22-356,
22-361 - 22-370
22-J86 - 22-41 "
22-431 - 22-460, "'peetively.
:.
~
f
8
oS
~ "
H
:to>
¡j
]~
n
USE ZONE CHART
ZONE
RM
SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES
3. Floor area requirements: minImum sleeping areas, and bathroom facilities will be detennined on a case-by-case
basis.
4. If any portion ofastructure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. trom an adjacent low density zone,
then either:
a. The height of that portion of the structure shall not exceed 15 ft. above average building elevation; or
b. The façade of that structure parallel to the low density zone shall not exceed 50 11,. in length.
5. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property.
6. Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriate requirements.
7. For sign requirements that apply to the projec~ see Article XVIII.
8. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX
L- F"otherinlmm"i"" aboat p"king ~d p"king ="', "e § 22-1376 et "q.
F" detail, olwh" may e"eod thi, height limit, "e § 22-1046 et "q.
FmdetaiI,reg"dingreqairedy"d'",e§22-ll3let"q.
(Ord.No. 94-m,§J(E), 10-18-94:Ord. No. 97-29J,§3,4-1-97;Ord. No. 99-333,§3, I-t9-99; O,d. No. 01-38' § J,4-J-OI)
I
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDA TION
DATE
July 30, 2002
To
VIA
Eric Faison, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe)
David M~~~ager
Kathy MCClu~~ Director of Community Development Services
Deb Barker, Associate Planner
FROM:
SIIIJ.lECT
Planning Commission Recommendation - Social SCI'viees Transitional
Housing Code Amendment To Federal Way Ci~v Code (FWCC)
A.
BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL
As part of the Year 2002 Planning Commission work program, staff has proposed a code amendment
related to reduction of the separation requircments for social services transitional housing unils. The
proposed code amendment would incorporate regulations into Federal Way Oty Code (FWCC) Chapter
22. The staff recommendation to the Planning Commission is attachcd as £;;hibit 1.
B.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on J nl\' 17. 2002, at which timc the,'
recommended apprOl'al of the code amendment as proposed by staff as listed in Exhibit I.
Social Services Transitional Housing
Currently. social services transitional housing unils arc permitted in the RS. RM. BN. BC and CC-
F zoning districts subjcet to FWCC standards. Onc 01' [he requiremcnts rs that the units bc
distanced 1,000 fect other social serviccs transitional housing units. The current non-prolit
provider oi'these units has identilied the separation requirement as a barrier to locating additional
social services transitional housing units within the City since the ai'fordable housing units arc
typically located within 1,000 feet of the cxisting units. Thc proposed code amendment (Exhibit 1)
\\'ould rcduce the separation rcquircmcnt for social ser\'iees housing units Irom 1,000 feet to 400
!cet only in thc RM zoning district. As proposed by stai'C thc code amendment would not altcr the
separation requirement for any othcr zoning district
Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC
July 30, 2002
c.
COUNCIL ACTION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Committee has the following options:
1. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed code
amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission.
2. Recommend that the full Council modifY and then approve the proposed code amendment.
3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed code amendment.
Staff recommends that the Committee recommend to the full Council adoption of the Planning
Commission's recommendation (Exhibit 2).
D. LAND USEfI'RANSPORTATION COMMITfEE RECOMMENDATION
The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for fIrst reading on August 20, 2002,
as follows:
--L-
As recommended by Planning Commission.
As recommended by Planning Commission and amended by the LUTC.
Approval Of Committee Action:
~E' Ftf
nc atson
/:::Z~i/-hŽ
Mike Park / Dean McColgan
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Staff Report to the July 17,2002, Planning Commission
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
Draft Ordinance
Page 2
ST AFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Amendments to the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Relating to Separation
Requirements for Social Services Transitional Housing Units
Planning Commission Meeting of July 17,2002 ..
Applicant:
City of Federal Way
Proposed Action:
Amendment to Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter Relating to Separation
Reqnirements for Social Services Transitional Housing Unit
Staff:
Dcb Barker, Associate Planner
SErA:
An Environmental Determination ofNonsignificanee was issued for the proposal
on May 4, 2002
Staff
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the separation requirement for social services transitional
housing units be reduced from 1,000 feet to 400 feet, only in RM zoning districts.
I.
BACKGROUND
As part of its regular review of development regulations, staff has identified the need to amend the text of
Federal Way City Code (FWCe) Chapter 22 to address the following:
Modi/!' tile zone tf.W! c/rart.\.eparatioll requiremellt for Social Sen'ices Trallsitiollal Housillg 10
decrease tile dislance Ihey mu.,1 be separaledfrom other Social Service., Trallsitional Housiug
tmil.\, from 1,000 feel 10 400 feet. Slaffrecommends Ihal thi., occur Oll(!, ill Rill ZOlling districts
a., discussed belolt'-
DEFINtTiON OF SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
Under Fwce Section 22~ 1, "Dcflnitions," social service transitiollal housing mcans facilitics other than
offices and group homes as defined in this chapter, opcrated by a nonprofit social service agency, licensed
as required by the state, providing temporary and transitional housing to individuals on an as-needed basis
including, but not limited to, emergency shelters, homeless shelters, and other such crisis intervention
facilities. This classification includes domestic violence shelters as defined herein, except that such
shelters wherein the total number of residents does not exceed the maximum number allowed under the
"family" definition, may be permitted outright in all residential zones.
Type A. Maximum number of residents to be consistent with the maximum number of unrelated
adults allowed under the zoning definition of family.
EXHIBIT I
PAGEÌ-OF _10_-
Type B: All social service transitional housing not meeting the definition of"Type A," above.
Maximum number to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
The limitation on the number of residents in social service transitional housing shall not be applied if it
prohibits the City from making reasonable accommodations to disabled persons in order to afford such
person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling as required by the Fair Housing Añ1Cndments Act of
1988,42 USC 3604(f)(3)(b)
DEFINITION OF FA~IIL\'
Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1, the definition of family means an individual or two or more individuals
related by not more than four degrees of affinity or consanguinity, and including persons under legal
guardianship, or a group of no I more than five persons who arc not related by four or fewer degrees of
affinity or consanguinity; provided however, that any limitation on the number of residents resulting liOl11
this definition shall not be applied if it prohibits the City from making reasonable accommodations to
disabled persons in order to afford such persons equal opportunity to use and cnjoy a dwclling as required
by the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988, 42 USC 3604(f)(3)(b).
DEFINITION OF TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
Under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) transitional housing means a project that provides
housing and supportive services to homeless persons or families for up to two years and that has as its
purpose facilitating the movement of homeless persons and families to independent living.
Social services transitional housing units arc permitted uses in the Residential (RS),I Residential
Multifamily (RM), Neighborhood Business (BN), Community Business (BC), and City Center - Frame
(CC-F) zoning districts subject to specific criteria as summarized below. The uses are permitted only if
the I,OOO-foot separation requirement is met; the facility and program secures and maintains all licenses
and/or approvals as required by the sÙlte; the subject property is optimally located to public
transportation, shopping, health care providers, and other services; the facility will be operated under the
authority of a reputable governing board, social service, or agency; the facility has appropriate staning,
supervision, and security; it will not ereatc unreasonable impacts; has adequate parking; is in compliance
with health, safety, and welfare; and operates under an approved management plan. Each social services
transitional housing unit permitted under the FWCC must have a management plan on file with the City
Clerk (Exhibit A - Managemenl Plan Guidelines). These specific criteria and performance standards serve
to mitigate potential impacts from the soeial service transitional housing use.
II.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT
Modify the use zone eharts to decrease the separation requirements for social services transitional housing
units from 1,000 to 400 feet in applicable zoning districts (Exhibil B -Applicable Zoning Charts). Staff
recommends that this change OCcur only in RM zoning districts as discussed below.
, RS zone only allows type ^ social services transitional housing
Planning Commission Slalr Itepm1
Soeiat Services Transilionaillousing Code Amendmenl
- -
----
July 17,2002
EXHIBIT' Pagel
Pl1~: ,~ ~
The City of Federal Way adopted social services transitional housing uses in a 1994 code amendment.
The resulting ordinance permitted social services transitional housing units in'the Residential (RS),'
Residential Multifamily (RM), Neighborhood Business (BN), Community Business (BC), and City
Center - Frame (CC-F) zoning districts pursuant to appropriate land use processes. According to land use
charts, the City may permit social service transitional housing units only if the criteria are met. The first
criteria is as follows: ' .
(a) The facility is distanced at least 1,000 feet from any other facility under Ihis classification
There have bccn six socia! services transitional housing LInits reviewed since the code amendment
established this type of housing unit in Federal Way. The only applicant for these uses since the 1994
code amendment has been the FUSION] wing of the Federal Way Community Caregiving Network
(FWCCN),' This agency has identified the separation rcquirement as a barrier to locating transitional
housing in Federal WayS
The 1994 ordinance adopted the social services transitional housing definition and cstablishcd review
criteria for these uses'" The staff report prepared for the 1994 ordinance recommended that a I,OOO-foot
separation requirement be established for Social services transitional housing, "...to preclude
overconcentration of these facilities," The report continued:
.. With respecllo facilities such as homeless shelters, it is recommended that Ihey be set back by
1,000fcetfrom allY other sllchfacility No setback reqllirementfrom sellsitive land lIses is seell
as essclltiol for these types of facilities, however, fhe recommended approval criteria((!r these
uses establishes authority to mitigate potential impacls 10 Ihe immediate neighborhood, which
could illclude such setbacks, ..
The 1994 code amendment included a wide range of group homes regulations in the City. The report did
not recommend spacing requirements for protected group homes as they apply to group homes under the
Fair Housing Act.
Staff researched the potential for impacts created by the establishment of the six existing social services
transitional housing units established under the 1994 ordinance, Staff interviewed the acting property
managers of live7 of the six housing units to inquire if there were identified impacts with the existing
social service transitional housing unit and if they helieved there would be any problems if another social
services transitional housing unit were established in their complex. The managers did nol reveal any
impacts crealed by Ihe cxisting units, and felt Ihal they would have no problem with additional similar
social services transilional housing units. Over-concentration of social serviccs transitional housing units
wilhin existing programmatic design and with existing caseworkers does not appear to be of conccrn.
------
1 RS zone only allows type A,
) Friends United to Shelter the Indigent, Oppressed, and Needy
. FUSION purchases condominium units for transitional housing. They contract with the South King County YWCA as a case
manager, to provide housing to homeless women and their childrcn in Fcderal Way, Thcir six housing projects arc located in
eXISting muhifamily housing condominium complex
5 Members of FUSION have stated that dne to tbe I,OOO-foot requirement, tbey arc runnnrg out or arrordable housing options
wnhin the City or Federal Way dcspite thc continued need to house homeless women and their children,
0 Federal Way Ordinance 1194-223 was adopted October 18, 1994.
J As the sixth bnnsing unn a is new mHt, there was not enough tnue to eon"der impacts
Planning Commrssion Starr Repo"
Soei,il Services Transrtional I loosing Code Amendmcnt
July 17,2002
Page J
EXHIBIT _L-
Staff researched the separation requirements for.transitional housing and homeless housing in other cities
to ascertain if there were other options to the I ,OOO-foot requirement. It was found that in the cities of
Auburn, Kent, Renton, KirkÌand, Des Moines, and.Bellevue: a) for the most part, they have not codified a
distinction.between transitional housing and either single-family or multifamily housing; b) where they
have made a distinction, it is for limited purpose such as setting maximum occupancy or'maximum length
of stay; and c) and in no casc do dcvclopment standards related to such housing address separation or
dispersal (Exhibit C - Report all Other Killg Coullly Cities' Standards).
With no clear discernable impacts created by the cxisting social service transitional housing use and no
comparable dispersion standards available from other cities, staff has reviewed a range of options to
address the dispersion issue.
a.
Reduce the ¡ ,OOO-foot requirement to 400' feet for all zoning districts.
b. Reduee the ¡ ,OOO-foot requirement to 400 feet for only type ^ social serviccs transitional
housing units in all zoning districts.
c.
Reduce the 1 ,OOO-foot requirement to 400 feet only in the RM zoning district.
d. Reduce the I,OOO-foot requirement to 400 feet for all zoning districts that permit
multifamily dwelling units, provided that no more than three social service transitional
housing units per multifamily complex can be established.
e.
Eliminate the I ,OOO-foot scparation requirement only in the RM zoning district.
During tllis review, staff found that option C results in the least impacts for the proposed reduction of
separation requirements. A discussion of each option with an example of how the change could be
implemented follows.
a.
Reduce the I ,OOO-foot requirement to 400 feet separation for all social services transitional
housing units in RS, RM, BN, BC, and CC-F zoning distllcts.
Discussion: This option reduces the separation requirement to 400 feet for all social service
transitional housing units in the RS, RM, BN, BC, and CC-F zoning districts. It is a broad
option that still maintains dispersion criteria for these uses. However, with a 400-foot
separation requirement, additional social service transitional housing units could be
established in several of the larger condominium complex containing existing social service
transitional housing units.
As an example under this scenario, a homeless shelter approved as a social services
transitional housing unit under the FWCC could be established a minimum of 400 feet from
another homeless shelter approved via the FWCC in RS, RM, EN, BC, and CC-F zones.
"~---',
'400 ket is approxirnately tire lengtlr of 1.25 foollrall fields or tire distance from City Iiall to Virginia Mason as tire crow nics. A
Irloek is 310 kellrased on tire King County grid system
ptanning Commission Staff (tepol1
Social Services Transilional Iiousing Code Amendmenl
July 17,2002
EXHIBIT rge4
.1
'"
b. Reduce the I ,OOO-foot requirement to 400 feet separation for only type A social services
transitional housing units in RS, RM, BN, BC, and CC-F zoning districts.
Discussiol/: This option reduces the separation requirement for only type A social service
transitional housing units in the RS, RM, BN, BC, and CC-F zoning districts. Type A social
serviccs transitional housing is defined as, "Maximum number of residents to be consistent
with the maximum number ofunre!ated adults allowed under the zoning dcflnition of
family." This option maintains the larger (I ,OOO-foot) separation requirement for type B
social servicc housing units, which arc those that do not meet the definition of type A. The
occupants who may reside in type ^ social service transitional housing appear no different
tlialJ tllOse wlio live ilJ a nolJ-soeial service transil10lJaI housilJg ulJit. Tlie reduetiolJ or
separation requiremelJts is appropriate for those social services transitional housing uses
that have similar impacts to that of a non-social service transitional housing unit, or the
typical single or multi-family housing unit.
As an example, a type ^ homeless shelter witli no more than five unrelated adults may be
cstabl ished no less than 400 feet from another type ^ shelter with no more five unrelated
adults under this option. This prevents homeless shelters from locating in the samc
multifamily building, but may permit the use within the same multifamily complex. Also,
under this secnario, a type ^ homeless shelter could be established in the same residential
single family subdivision within an RS zoning district but no closer than 400 feet to another
type ^ shelter9 However, all type ^ homeless shelters must be separated from a type B
homeless shelter (containing more than five unrelated adults) by at least 1,000 feet.
c.
Reduce tlie I ,OOO-foot requirement to 400 feet only in the RM zoning districts (LxiI/hit j)
I'ro¡JOsed Use '/01/1' C/¡orl MOillflcation).
Discussiol/' This option permits the establishment of social services transitional housing
units no less than 400 feet apart only in RM zoning districts. All other zoning districts that
permit social se['vice transitional housing units (RS, BN, BC, and CC-F) would maintain the
I ,nOn-foot separation requirement for social service transitional housing units. ^ ~oo-root
separation requirement only in the RM zoning district would enable the establishment or
additional social service transitional housing units within several of the I?rger condominlllll1
complexes with existing social service transitional housing unitsW While there an: 13
multifamily apartment complexes located in zoning districts other than RM in the Federal
Way City limits, this reduced separation requirement would not apply to them.
Staff recommends this option as it reduces separation parameters in a limited bItt nonetltekss
valuable way, and creates the least impact on the City as a whole. Restricted in scope to only
tlte RM zoning district and maintaining the I ,OOO-foot separation in all other zoning districts,
tltis option provides for additional social service transition housing units to be established
within that par1ieular zoning district that has been designed and developed to accommodate
multiple dwclling residents. The addition of another social services transitional housing unit
on an apartment compkx witlt existing social services transitional housing unit(s) should not
----
'eN;ce, tcansd;onal hous;n~ units pmndted ;n RS zoning doslncls
"",cem oflhe tWCCN" they puceh"" art",dahk condo",;n;um p,ope";,, localed '" 11M ""';og
------
-----
I'l,oooog ComoÙss;on SI"lì ltGI'm I
Social Services ("0,,;10"",[ 1 Im""'I' t :0<1" ^mcndo,cnl
Jot)' 17.2002
I'age S
~_~HIBJT
I
."..
have an impact on the complex residents, or the public at large, if all decisional criteria arc
meLln addition, the underlying density is not impacted by the addition of a social services
transitional housing.unit, as it would be established within an existing housing unit.
As an example, a homeless shelter locating in an RM zoning district could be established no
less than 400 feet from an existing homeless shelter in that same zoning district. This could
inelude the addition of a homeless shelter to an apartment or condominium complex
containing existing homeless shelter(s), providing 400 feet separate them. All homeless
shelters in RS, BN, BC, and CC-F zoning districts would continue to be separated from other
homeless shelters by 1,000 feet.
d.
Reduce the I ,OOO-foot requirement to 400 feet for all zoning districts that permit
multifamily dwelling units, provided thilt no more than three social service transitional
housing units per multifamily complex can bc established.
Discussion: This option assumes that the social services transitional housing writ is located
within a multifamily apartment complex where stacked or attached dwelling units arc
available to rent or own. This option reduces the separation requirement for all types of soci,d
services transitional housing units located in multifamily dwelling units from 1,000 to 400
feet but also limits the total number of units established under this code provision to thrce pel
multifamily complex. This option serves to permit more social service transitional housing
units in the City, as more affordable housing units would be available for purchasc while
ensuring that the number of social services transitional housing units in anyone complex docs
not create potential advcrsc impacts. This option would not apply to social services
transitional housing provided in detached dwelling units.
As an example, up to three homeless shelters could be located within one apartment or
condominium complex provided that each shelter is separated from other shelters by at least
400 feel. This option would apply to the RS, RM, BN, BC, and CC-f zoning districts, but
only to units provided in a stacked or attached dwelling unit complex.
e.
Eliminate the I ,OOO-foot separation requirement only in the RM zoning district.
f)iscussioll. This option eliminates the I ,OOO-foot separation requirement for only t[¡use
social service transitional housing units located in a RM zoning district. All other zoning
districts that permit social service transitional housing units (RS, BN, BC, and CC-F) would
maintain the I ,OOO-foot separation requirement for social service transitional housing units.
Elimiltation oCthe separation requirement would enable additional social service transitional
housing units to be established within the multifamily zoning district, ineluding those with
existing social service transitional housing units.
The underlying density of the RM zoning district is not increased with the elimination oCthe
separation requirement, as the social service transitional housing unit would be established
within an existing housing unit.
Elimination of the separation requirement could creale an appearance oCover-concentration of
social service transitional housing units within a multifamily complex as the social selvice
transitional housing units conld be established next to another social selvice transitional
~.._-
._-~..-.~
Planning Connn;"ion Stalf ltcI'm!
Social Selvlces 1 ransitionailiousing Code An,endmcut
July 17,2002
I'age (,
EXHIBIT
,
.X"-
housing unit. The appearance of over-concentration may.not be evident to those outside the
complex. However, the elimination orany.separation requirement may .diminishes the ability
of owners and managers to mitigate any potential adverse impacts resulting from the close
proximity of social service transitional housing units. Indeed, according to Daniel Lauber,
AICP, "More than 50 studies show that community residences generate no adverse impacts
on single-family districts if they are licensed and not clustered in a block.""
As an example under the separation elimination scenario, a homeless shelter locating in an
RM zoning district could be established next to an existing homeless shelter in that same
zoning district. This could inelude the additiOli of a homeless shelter to an apartment or
condominium complex containing existing homeless shelters.
Redoction of the separation requirement when limited in nature, such as redoeed only for type A social
service transitional housing proposals, or reduction only in RM zones, docs not alter the ovcrall
regulatory nature of the development criteria and performance standards. To this end, staff recommends
option C, the reduction of separation requirements only in RM zoning districts, be adopted.
This code amendment and associated recommendation does not propose to eliminate the separation
requirement in any form, nor docs it propose to widen the use of social services transitional housing units
in other zoning districts beyond those permitted.
III
REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning," Ar1icle IX, "Process VI Review," establishes a process and criteria for
zoning code text amendments. Consistent with Process VI review, the role of the Planning Commission is
as follows:
To review and evaluate the zoning code text regarding any proposed amendments;
To determine whether the proposed zoning code text amendment meets the criteria
provided by FWCC Section 22-528; and,
To forward a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption ofthc proposed zoning
code text amendlllcni.
IV
PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
May 4,2002
May 18,2002
July 17,2002
Determination ofNonsignitïcance pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act
End ofSEPA Comment Period
Planning Commission Public Hearing
""Group Think": Planning Mag;lIinc, October 1~~5
Planning Commission Slall I(cpoll
Social Services Transilionailioosing Code Amcrrdmeol
Joly 17,2002
Page 7
EXI-HBIT ,
, --
v
DECISIONAL CRITERIA
FWCC Section 22-528 provides criteria for zoning text amendments. The following section analyzes the
compliance of the proposed zoning text amendment with the criteria provided by FWCC Section 22-528.
The City may amend the text of the FWCC only if it finds that:
I. 71/C proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisiol/s o/the comprehel/sive
plill/,
The proposed FWCC text amendment is consistent with, and substantially implcments, thc
following Federal Way Comprehel/sive PIa/I (FWCP) goals and policies:
LUej 3
LUl'15
If NO
IfP34
IfP37
HNI
Prcscrvc and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods.
Protect residential arcas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses.
Continue to permit emergency and transitional homeless facilities within the city.
Removc existing regulatory barriers to siting specialnccds housing to avoid
concentration and to ensure uniform distribution throughout all residential
and mixed-use zones, subject to performance standards that protect residential
amenity, ensure proper access, and maintain design standards.
Ensure that access to special needs housing is provided without
discrim ination.
Emergency shelters and transitional housing should be regulated to avoid
concentration of facilities, mitigate impacts on surrounding uses, ensure that
such housing is properly managed, and avoid significant impacts on existing
residential neighborhoods.
2. ]1Ie proposed amcndmel/t bears a substal/tial relatiol/ship to public health, sajety, or welfare;
al/d
The proposed FWCC text amendment permits the establishment of additional transitional
housing units, which have a direct relationship to the public health, safety, and welfare of the
homeless in Federal Way, while maintaining regulatory standards.
3.
The proposed amendmel/t is ill the best interest aj the residents oj the city.
The proposcd FWCC text amendment maintains separation requirements for social services
transitional housing units, yet ensures °pp0l1unities for transitional housing, which arc in the
best interest of the residents or the City.
Planning Connnissinn StaO' Itcpo"
Social Son-ices Trdnsitional t lousing Codc Amendment
July t7, 2002
Page S
~_XHI~T ,
~Jo.
VI
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions ofrWCC Section 22-539, the Planning Commission may take the
following actions regarding the proposed zoning code text amendments:
1. Rccommend to City Council adoption of the rwcc text amendment as proposed;
2. Modify the proposed rwcc text amendment and recommend to City Conneil adoption of
the FWCC text amendment as modified;
3. Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWCC text amendment not be adopted; or,
4. Forward the proposed rwcc text amendment to City Council without a recommendation.
VII
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The following motion is suggested:
"Move to recommend to the CÍ(y Council for adoptiou of the p.-oposed rwcc text
amendment:
Modify the RM Use Zone Chart to decrease the separation '"equiremenls for
social sel-viees transitional housing units from 1,000 feet to 400 feet."
(If changes occur as a result of Planning Commission deliberations add, "...as amended by the
Planning Commission.")
VIII
EXIIIBITS
Exhibit A - Management Plan Guideline
Exhibit ß - Use Zone Charts Pennitting Social Services Transitional Housing Units (RS,
RM, ßN, BC, & CC-r)
r-xhibit C - Report on King County Cities Transitional Housing Standards
Exhibit D - Proposed RM Zone Use Chart Modification
NOTC The proposed amendments have been prepared in '"line-in/line-a.,t" format. with strikNJ.,ts (proposed
dcletiom) and underline (proposed additions) indicated.
'"XJCUMEt<T\Soo;.r s" H~"og coo, Am=d'J'r.OO,O8 r~'m",~" So" Rq>o" 07-17~2 d.x
ptanning Commission S!arrRcpOl1
Social Services Tronsi!ional Housing Code Amendmen!
Juty 17,2002
Page 9
EXHIBIT'
EXHIBJT I
PAGE~~
.""=
. ED ER.FIL
~~RY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNIT
MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES
SOCIAL SERVICE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
Note to Applicants: /Jepelldlllg 011 your proposal, soll/e itell/s ill these guide/Illes may not apply; il so,
please indicate 'N/A "Also, lor soll/e items you may not have colI/plete inlormalioll at the time you submll
your managemellt plan. llso, please indicate when and how you will have the inlormation. For illslance,
itell/lI8.a. applies 10 a neighborhood relations plan Yollmay IlOt have colI/pleted this plall at the time you
subl/ut your proposal. llthal is Ihe case, sill/ply describe the plan, how it will be implemented, oud when
However, at least t\i'o weeks prior 10 the tJUblic hearÍlw, au)lJ1!1iì.uished items thai at!J!lJi 10 vow' li[2JiO.wl
should have been colI/{Jleted and an ulJdated (Jlan or addendulI/ to the ori¡ziM1.¡Jlall shollid be submilted
10 the citv {Jlallll", assi¡Zlled to VSJ11lJJfl!Jecl.
ApPLICANT INFORMATION
a Project Name
b Project Addrcss
c Agency/Applicant Name and Phone Number
d. Agency Address
EMERGENCY CONTACTS
a Name, phone number, and title of person who will serve as the primalY contact for the
overall management of the facility. (This should be the individual to whom stafJare
accountable and who will be available to city ofììcials, if necessary, to r.csolve concerns
pertaining to the facility.)
Names and phone numbers of two emergency contacts available on a 24-hour basis. (One or
these may be the person listed in a., above.)
b
PROJECT OVERVIEW
a Provide an overall description of the project.
Type of housing (such as transitional or
emergency);
Type of clients (such as families, men only,
women only, etc.);
Target number of clients tbe project
anticipates to serve;
Length of stay of residents (can be
approximate, if "rdeflnitc, what factors will
dctenulne length of slay?);
At a minimum include;
0 If school-aged children will or may reside in
the project, list tile local service schools
(clement8Iy,junior high, and high school) and
describe tile school transportation
arrangements for tilese children (if none will
reside in tile project, please state); and,
0 Maximum number of residents, including
resident staff if applicable, wlto will stay in the
facility at anyone time. .A
~~~I~I~
Management Plan Guidelines - Soçial Service Transitional Housing
AdoptèdJuly5,1995 .
Page 2 0/4
GOVERNING AGENCY INFORMATION .
a. State the full name of the agency under which the project will be operated and the full naine
of any local governing board or administratiye agency, if applicable. If the parent agency and
the local governing board or administrative agency are one and the same, please state.
b. Provide a briefhislory of this agency's experience with similar projects, preferably local and
recent experience.
c Provide an organization chart of the govérning agency.
d. Please attach copies of:
Notl-pro(ittax status (501(c)3 or other
tax excll1ptiotl;
Agency f",atleia! statell1etlt and project
budget;
. Slate liccnse(s) required for tius program; and,
. Liability insuratlce for tile governing agency
(copy ofliability insurance for tile project sitc
is required I'rior to OCCUOJlli9:).
STAFFING, SUPERVISION, AND SECURITY .
a. List names, titles, and duties of all project staff, including any non-employee staff working as
contractors or volunteers.
b List names and title of staff, if any, who will reside in the dwelling, either full or part time,
and state their working hours.
What is the staff-to-resident ratio? (Indicate if this includes resident staff.)
d. Describe staff hiring policies, including required professional qualifications.
Describe inservice training policies for staff.
[fthe project will utilize contractor-consultants, explain how and when they will be utilized.
If the project will utilize volunteers, explain how they will be used, trained, and supervised.
How is the proposed level of staffing and supervision appropriate for these particular clients
and their needs? Can adjustments to staffing and supervision be made should related
problems occur?
What is the program's visitor policy (hours, length of stay)? [f not applicable to this clientele,
please explain
J. What are the program's "house rules" to facilitate the orderly day-to-day operation of the
program (noisc!disturbance, curfews, housework, cooking, keeping pets, bathroom rules,
alcohol policy, etc.). [fnot applicable to this clientele, please explain.
k. What is the program policy regarding alcohol consumption? If none, please explain.
I What is the program policy regarding keeping of firearms or other weapons? Ifno policy,
please explain why.
m. Does the program haye at least one operating telephone accessible to all residents?
n. How will residents be trained in the use of emergency procedures? Please describe.
o. If the program will operate as a "safehouse" for yictims of domestic abuse or violence, has
the local police department been alerted? Have they reviewed the security plan for the site?
c
e.
f
g
h
EXHIBIT'. A .
PAGE 2- OF If
Management Plan Guidelines ~ Social Service Transitional Housing -
Adopted July 5, 1995
Page 3 of 4
PROGRAM AND CASE MANAGEMENT
a. Describe specific elements of the case management plan that will apply to the.program
(substance abuse and other counseling, health, or medical assistance; employment or job
training; child care; food and clothing; financial assistance; transportation assistance; etc.).
b Describe screening and intake procedures.
c. If this housing is transitional (as opposed to emergency), how will residents be assisted in
locating permanent housing?
d. If this housing is emergency (as opposed to transitional), how will clients b~ referred to
appropriate agencies or programs?
e. What local and regional social service programs and community support groups will the
agency or staff collaborate with to provide maximum benefit to the residents?
Please describe grievance procedures for residents and staff.
Describe exiting program and eviction procedures, if applicable. - -
Do any of the residents have medical or physical restrictions needing specialized attention? If
so, please explain.
f
g
h.
PROPERTY INFORMATION AND MANAGEMENT
a. How does the facility comply with applicable requirements for health, fire, building, and
safety requirements?
b. AIe there federal or state requirements that apply to this facility, such as handicapped
accessibility via the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)? If so, how will the facility
comply? .
Describè the plan for maintenance and sanitation of the grounds and facility. At a minimum
the plan should address.
Grounds: mowing, wceding, gcneral
cleanup;
c
Structure: painl, geileral repairs; and
Regular removal of garbage, junk, or dcbris.
NEIGI1ßORILOOD RELATIONS PLAN AND PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC SERVICES
a Please describe the agency's plan for neighborhood relations. At a minimum, the agency
should have a plan to meet with or notify neighborhood residents, describe the program,
identify any neighborhood concerns, establish specific methods to address those concerns,
monitor the success of those methods, and assure that adjustments to program operation will
be made as nccessary and appropriate to correct any problcms that arise.
b. Explain how the site has convenient access to key places and services such as jobs, bus lines,
shopping, health care providers, schools, recreation, and/or other services and facilities that
these clients will visit on a regular basis, such as counseling agencies, churches, and social
services agencies.
EXHIBIT 1A-
PAm:: ,~ OF q
Management Plan Guidelines - Social Service Transitional Housing
Adopted July 5, 1995
Page 4 of 4
b
TRArFIC INrORMATION
What is the anticipated trip generation of the project (number of vehicle trips'per day)?
How many parking stalls will be provided on site and how will this number be adequate to
mcct thc parking demand?
Do you anticipatc any on-strect parking as a rcsult of this project? Does on-street parking
cufTCl1tly cxist in thc vicinity')
Describe how the appearance of the proposed parking arca will bc consistent with the
character of surrounding uses.
c
d
ApPROVAL GY lIt[ GOVERNING BOARD OR AGENCY
The management pIan must be signed by an authorized representative of the governing board Of
agcncy, which signature will constitute approval of the plan by the governing board or agency.
MGW"AN1~
"'~"n7l';Q]
EXHIBIT l-A
PAGE~OF ~
Federal Way City Code § 22-633.5
PAGE ._ .
Federal Way City Code § 22-669.5
§. 22-727
22-760
Fcdcral Way City Codc § ZZ-760
Federal Way City Code § 22-811
oO '
22-201
§ 22-811
"Separation Requirements for Transitional I-lousing" Page 1 of 1
Introduction
Tt~is report contains the results of a phone survey of planners in Auburn, Kent, Rentoa,
Iiir 'kland, Des Moines and Bellevue regarding their city codes' separation requirements for
transitional housing or other housing designa6ons equivalent to "social service transitional
housing," as defined in Cliapter 22 of dm Federal Way City Code. In addidon to teleplione
intet~iexvs, I also searched tim city codes for each jurisdiction using key words related to
Uansidonal housing. Telephone inter, dews validate dm findings of dm city code'gearches.
Results follow.
Auburn
Auburn currcndy has no codes rcgulaung u ansiuonal housing tier .~e. ' The city may, m
certain circumstances, treat transitional housing as group residence facilities, defined in
Chapter 18.04.440, however, developnmnt standards applicable to such f~cilides do not
specify minimum s¢i~arations2 (see Appendix A for dtis chapter and codes sections
referenced in it).
Chapter 18.48.090, .II or~ re/case,/;tr re/ease at~d z~t/~//arfao/~/~es, docs contain dispersal cmerm,
which rcquirc a minhnum 1,000 feet from several kinds of use, including such dfings as
residential, group home and park (see Appendix A for details of this section). Tiffs was the
only mention of separation requirements I came across dm/ng my research.
The situation in odmr jurisdictions I contacted - including Kent, Renton, Kirkland, Des
Momes ~nd Bellevue - is essentially similar to Auburn with respect to transitionM housing
and separation requirements for transitional housing:
· tot thc most part, they have not codificd a dissection betxvcen transitional liousiug and
either single-family or multi family housing;
· where they have made a distinction, it is for a li~mted pint, ese, such as setting m~xhnum
occupation or m~ximum length of stay3;
· aud in no c~sc do development standards related to such housing address separation or
dispersal.
I've summalized below what I leall~ed in phone cnlls to each o£ the cities named ~bovc.
Kent
Kent City (;ode does define transilional housi~g, and transitional housing is a principally
pem'dttcd use in the city's C;C and CIM2 zones, where it is limited to 20 residents at any one
~ Flora Shirley Aird, plalmer for housing and social sclwices; 253-804-5040.
~ Codes regulating o~ sctling special slandards, such as separation requirements, for special kinds of
housing have been found to be tmconstitutional m some cases, according to the Auburn pla~mer.
3 Kent City (.'ode 15.02.528 'l't ansitiona[ housing; 7}'ansilional housing means a facility operated publicly
el privately to provide housing for individuals or families who arc otherwise homeless and have ]~o other
imnmdiatc living options available to them. Transitional houxittg shall not exceed an eighteen (18) month
period per individual el family. (O~d No. 2832, § l, 2-21-89) /~.
EXItlBITI'
PAGE. |
"Separation Rcquirm,ents for T£ansitional Housing" . . . page 2 of 2
time and four resident staff. However, development standards do not specify separation '
requkements.4
Renton
Renton's zonSng code does not address transitional housing. The typ~s of uses ty~ically
identified as transitional - homeless shelters, do~nesdc violence safe houses, etc. - arc
regulated as either as single-family residential or tnuld-fanfily residential uses, delS~ncling on
the configuration,s
Kirldand
I~kland's zoning code does not address transitional housing. Transitional housing is treated
shnply as single-family or multi-fanfily residential housing, without any separation
requirements.6
Des Moines
Transitional housing is addressed with code for single- or multi-family liousing; Des Moines'
code addresses neither transitional housing nor separation for single- or multi family housing
s~rving as transitional housing.7
Bellevue City Code does not define transitional housing, wl~ch is treated essentially as fan~ly
housingfi There are neidmr development standards applicable to transitional housing nor
separation requirements for any family housing. Wtfile Bellexme has, in the past,
disfinguislied transitional housing from oflmr housing and applied special development
standards to it, they no longer do so. City code has been amended to remove these sections,
the result of past litigation.
A~cndix A
Aub um.~.ity Code
"Group residence facility" meao$ a facility licensed by the state and operated with full-time
supervision for housing resident persons who, by reasons of thch- mental or physical
disability, addiction to drags or alcohol, or family and social adjusm~cnt problems, require a
transitional nonmedical trcaunent program for reliabilitadon and social rcadjustmcut. Fol
tim purposes of d~is fide, a nonmcdical treatment program consists of counsclh~g, vocational
guidance, traimng, group dmrapy and odmr sin~ilar rehabilitative sctx4ccs but does not
Front Matt Gilbcrl, Kent plamter; 253-856-5454.
From Loraine Nicolai, Renton planner; 425-530-7294.
From Dawn Nelson, Ktrkland plamung supervmor; 425-828-1131.
* From Corbitt Loch, Des Moincs planning ntanager; 206-870-7576. EXHIBIT['
From Carol Itelland, Bellevue land-use division director; 425a152-2724.
PAGE Z
"Separation Requirements for Transitional Housing" Page 3 of 3
include drug and/or alcohol detoxification. Monitoring the taking of p::escription medication
Shall B'e permitted. The use Of medication by any resident shall be incidental to' tt~at person's
residence in the facility and shall not be a criterion for. residence in the facility. This
de£mition does not include residential dwellings wlfich meet all odmr requirements of tlzis
tide, that provide programs related to d~is definition or which provide services of a nursing
home as defined by ACC 18.04.660. (Ord. 4590 [ 2 (Exh. A), i992; Ord. 4304.2 1(2), 1988;
Ord. 4229 ~ 2, 1987.)
18.16.030 Uses requiring permit.
Tim following uses may be pcr~mtted in an R-3 district whcn a conditional use permit has
been issued pursuant to dm provisions of Chapter 18.64 ACC: A. Boardinghouses;
B. Daycare, limited to mini daycare center, daycarc center and preschool/nursery
schools;
C. Duplexes, more than one per lot;
D. Foster care homes;
E. Govermnent facilities;
G. Multiple family dwellkngs; provided, that 3,600 square feet of lot area is provided
for each dwelling unit, and is limired to four divelling units per structure;
H. Museums;
I. Nursing homes;
J. Professional offices;
K. Religious institutions;
L. Utility substations. (Ord. 4229 .~ 2, 1987.)
18.16.040 Development standards.
Development standards in an R-3 district arc as follows:
A. Mininmm lot area for single-fan41y dwellings: 5,000 square feet;
B. Minimmn lot area for two fa~mly dwellings (duplexes): 7,200 square feet. Existing
platted lots of 7,000 to 7,200 square feet in area may bc alloxved to consmxct a
duplex;
C. Minhnmn lot area per dwelling unit: 3,600 square feet;
D. Minimum lot widd~: 60 feet;
1¢. Minimum lot del>th: 80 feet;
F. Maximum lot coverage: 40 percent;
G. Mininmm yard setbacks: 1. Front: 20 feet,
2. Side, interior: five feet,
3. Side, street: 10 feet,
4. Rear: 25 feet,
S. Accessoty structures shall meet all the required setbacks of dm zone with
the exception that the rear yard setback may be reduced to five feet;
p~ovided, that any structure with a vehicular entrance from a street (public or
private) or public alley shall hc se~ back a minimum of 20 feet;
I t. Maximum building height:
1. Main buildings: two and one-ball stories uot to exceed 30 feet,
EXHIBITI'C
Separauo Reqmrenmnts for Transitional ltousing" Page 4 of 4
2. A~ccesso~y buildings: one story not to; exce~:d 16 feet;
I. Fences and hedges: see Chapter 18.48 ACC;
J. Parking: see Chapter 18.52 ACC;
K. Landscaping: see Chapter 18.50 ACC;
L. Signs: see Chapter 18.56 ACC. (Ord. 4229 [ 2, 1987.)
The following uses may be permitted in an R-4 d/strict when a cond/tional use pem~it bas
been issued pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.64 ACC: A. Civic, social and fraternal clubs;
B. Daycar¢ lhnited to mini daycare, daycar¢ center, preschools or nursery schools;
C. Foster care homes;
D. Government facilities;
F. Hospitals (except anhnals);
G. Nursing homes; ~
It. Professional offices;
I. Relig/ous institutions;
. J. Utility substations. (Ord. 4229 [ 2, 1987.)
18.18.040 Development standards.
Development standards in an R-4 district are as follows: A. Minimmn lot area: 7,200 square feet;
B. Mir~num lot area per dwelling unit: 2,400 square feet;
C. Minimmn lot widdx: 50 feet;
D. 1Vfinimum lot depfl~: 80 feet;
E. Maxin~um lot coverage: 55 percent;
F. Minimum yard setbacks: 1. Front: 20 feet,
2. Side, interior: five feet,
3. Side, street: 10 feet,
4. Rear: 25 feet,
5. Accessory structures shall meet all thc required setbacks of thc zone witb
dm exception dmt the rear yard setback may bc reduced to five feet;
provided, tl~at any structure wid~ a velficular entrance from a street (publ/c or
private) or public alley shall be set back a minhnmn of 20 feet;
(3. Maximum building height: txvo and one-half stories not to exceed 30 feet;
It. Fences and hedges: sec Cliapter 18.48 ACC;
I. Parking: sec Chaptc~ 18.52 ACC;
J. Landscaping: see Chapter 18.50 ACC;
I'C Signs: see Chapter 18.56 ACC. (Ord. 4229 ¢ 2, 1987.)
18.48.090 Work release, prcrclcasc and similar facilities
Tlic foIlowing siting and performance standards shall apply to all work release, prcrelease
and sinfilar facilities offering alternatives to imprisomncnt:
A. Maximum nmnbcr of residents: No work rcleasc, prcrclcase or simila~ facility shall
house more Lhan 50 persons, excluding resident staff.
B. Dispersion criteria:
EXHIBITI O.,
PAGE t4
"Separation Requirements for Ttansitional Housing" Page 5 of 5
1. The lot Line of any new ot expanding work release, pretelease ox sini}lar
facility shall be located:
a. 1,000 feet or mote from an), kesidential zone; and
b. 1,000 feet o~ mote from any g~oup rYsidence facility as defined by
ACC 18.04.440; and
c. 1,000 feet or mote from any.acc~:edited 9ubl~c, private or pa~ocldal
school, excluding commemial ~chools such as .business,'eocafion~.bor
tecLinical schools; and
d. 1,000 feet or more from ~inj~ .religious Los:ira:ion meednc,:fl~e
reqmremcnts of~ conforrmng:use and ~neetmg all othcr, reqmrcm'ents
of the Auburn City Code: and
e. 1 000 feet oz,mbrc ~otn any pubLic park; and
f. 1 000 fcc: or more from=any lic~!~se,~ daygare center ~mrsc_ry.schiso
or preschoiSl"~ 'defined By AiGC';I 8:04.290: ~nd
g. One mile:or:more from' ariy'6thei: Work release, pfetclease
2. TLIe distances provided m :Ids. subsection sLiall be measured by following a
suaight line, widlout regard to intervening buildings, from tLic nearest point
of die property parcel upon which die proposed use ts to be located or
expanded, to die nearest point of die parcel of property or tile land use
district boundat3, Line from which die proposed land use is to be separated.
C. l£acLi facilitT sLiall provide on-site dining, on-site laundt3, or laundry setxrice, and
on site recreation [aciliLies to scI~e the residents.
D. A conditional use permit application for a work release, prerelease ot shnilar
Gc~lity sLiall be accompamed by proposed operating pdles for tile facility. TLiesc
proposed rules slmll be reviewed by the planmng directo~ tn consuhation with the
chief of police and the city attorney. The planning director shall include in any
recommendation on thc requested conditional use penmt an analysis of tLie
ploposcd rules as they may relate to thc findings of fact ~equired under ACC
18 64.040. (O~d 4590¢7 (Exh. F), 1992.)
EXHIBITI'O-'
PAGE cj OF
Exhibit 2
Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes
From the July 17, 2002 meeting
MEETING SUMMARY
Commissioners present: John Caulfield, ltope Elder, Bill Drake, Dini Duclos, Dave Osaki, and Grant Newport.
Commissioners absent (excused): Nesbia Lopes. Alternate Commissioners present: None. Alternate
Commissioners absent (excused): Christine Nelson (Tony Moore and Maria Justus Foldi were also absent).
Couocihnember present: Mayor Jeanne Burbidge. Staff present: Community Development Services Director
Kathy McChmg, Associate Planner Deb Barker, Associate Plaoner Jane Gamble, City Attorney Bob Sterbank,
and Administrative Assislant E. Tiaa Piety.
Chair Caulfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF SUMMARY
The May 15, 2002, meeting summary ,.vas approved with two minor chaoges: on page 2 under Public Testimony.
the second sentence, "Hi parents" shotdd be "His parents"; and at tile bottom of the page, tile meeting xvas
ad. ioumed at 8:21, not 7:21.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Moved to the end of the meeting.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC I[EARING -- Social Services Transitional Housing Units Code Amendment
The Public Ilearing was opened at 7:05 p. m. Commissioner Ilope excused herself froln this hearing because she
is a member ofd~e Federal Way Comnmnity Caregiving Network Board. Ms. Barker presented that staff report.
As part of its regular review of development regulations, staft'has identified the need 1o amend the separation
reqttkement for social services Irausitioua[ housing lmitx. Currently, 1,000 feet must be separate a social services
transitional housing trait tS'onl any other social services transitional housing unit. Staff researched five ways this
requirement could be amended:
a. Reduce the 1,000-foot requirement to 400 feet for all zoning districts.
b. Reduce tile 1,000 Ibot requirement to 400 feet for onl} type A social services transitional
housing unil in all zoning districts.
EXHIBIT ,..
Planning Commission Summary Page 2 July 17, 2002
c. Reduce the 1,000-foot requirement to 400 feet only in the RM zoning district.
d. Reduce the 1,000-foot requirement to 400 feet for all zoning districts that permit multifamily
dwelling units, provided that no more than three social service transitional housing units per
multifamily complex can be established.
e. Eliminate the 1,000-foot separation requirement only in the RM zoning district.
Staff recommends option c, "Reduce the 1,000-foot requirement to 400 feet only in RM zoning district." This
would allo~v a social services transitional housing unit to locate in a condominium where another exists, so long
as 400 feet separates them. This option reduces separation parameters in a limited but nonetheless valuable way,
and creates tbe least impact on the City as a whole.
The Commission asked why was a 1,000-foot separation originally chosen? Staff replied that there is limited
background information and the reason for choosing 1,000 feet is not addressed. However, there is some case law
from another cimuit court that discusses the therapeutic reasoning behind having a separation and 1,000 feet is
comlnon in other jurisdictions. It was asked why should there be any separation?
Staff indicated that currently, there are six social services transitional housing units (Type A) in tbe City under
these provisions. (There may be others that started before these provisions came into affect, and there are some
other types of "group" homes in the City.) Social services transitional housing units of this type have stringent
requirements. There is the 1,000-foot separation and the unit is governed by a management plan submitted to the
City, which requires monitoring of those who live in the unit. Another aspect governiug the location (and number)
of these types of units is the cost ora condominimn. FUSION (Friends United to Shelter the Indigent, Oppressed,
and Needy) is the only provider of these units in tbe City. They have informed the City that the need is great for
this type of housing, but because of the 1,000-foot separation, there is no affordable units left in the City.
When the provisions were first ill place, there were many questions about the suitability of the units by others
living in the condominiums where the units were placed. FUSION has been responsible in answering questions
and monitors the units closely. They are quick to respond to problems. There are still some questions when a ne~v
unit is proposed, but not as many. None of the applications for the six units were appealed.
The Public Testimony was opened at 7:30 p.m.
Linda Rasmussen, Regional Director of YWCA - Her agency contracts with FUSION to proved case
management to existing social services housing units. They have 27 unsolicited applications for one
housing unit. Their requests for such bousing are up 20 percent. She encouraged the Commission to
take the most flexible approach. She told tile Commission stories of some families and bow baviug
secured housing bas allowed them to succeed.
Beverly Klm, FUSION Boardmember She stated that homelessness is a huge social problem and the
need for housing is great. Caseworkers match the families to others residing in the condominium. The
faxnilies receive weekly case manage~nent from the YWCA, who in turn sends a monthly report to
FUSION. Since they started providing this housing, FUSION discovered that many of the women had
problems with such issues as budgeting. They now coutract with outside agencies/individuals to provide
advice/traiuing to tile women on such issues as budgeting and how to be good neighbors and citizens.
Since startiug their program, 75 percent of those on the program have found permanent housing. Ou
average, a family will stay iu a social services transitional housing unit for six to twelve months.
Planning Commission Summary Page 3 July 17, 2002
Susie Horan, CoMwell Banker General Manager - They have helped purchase the six units. She is
familiar with the price range of condominiums and noted there are few units that fit into the affordable
range. Of those that are affordable, there is now a social services transitional housing un!t in each of
them. FUSION bas volunteers ready to help provide another unit, but cannot do anything until the code
is changed. She stated that FUSION has become a model to other communities on how to provide this
type of housing. She would prefer the Commission choose option e (eii~ninate the 1,000-foot
separation). Other cities do not have setbacks and the restriction is not needed because there are
enough people to oversee tile program. Changing to a 400-foot separation may double the number of
units, but it also depends on where in the condominium the current unit is situated (if it is in the middle
of the condominium, there may not be 400 feet between it and any otber unit) and a unit must be for
sale that is 400 feet away from the current oue.
Peggy LePorte, Founding Member of FUSION- She stated the need is great. FUSION is an all
volunteer organizatiou. In their nine years of operation, there have been few problems. Problems that
arise are dealt with immediately. They keep in contact with tile homeowners association, who calls tile
case manager if there are any problems. In 1993, tile need was not as great and the 1,000-foot
separation xvas not a problem. No~v that the need for tile housing has grown, the 1,000-foot separatiou
has become a problem. If the need continues to grow, 400 feet mhy become a problem. If the
restriction remains in place, they will have to purchase higher cost units. This could meau a higher cost
to the City because they use Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
Public Testimony was closed at 7:50 p.m. The Commissiou asked what is the risk to the City if the separation is
changed? Staff replied it is a negligible risk. There have been relatively few problems. Staffquestioncd
apartment mangers with these units aud they said they have ahnost ilo problems. This does not mean that
problems will never happen.
The Public Hearing was closed at 7:55 p.~n. It was m/s/c to accept the staff recommendation and forward it on to
the Land/Use Transportation Committee (LUTC). Further discussiou was held oil eliminating the separation
requirement, but it was felt that because ora current volatile situatiou, it is best to have a separation requirement.
PUBLIC HEARING - Miscellaneous Code Amendments
Tile Public Hearing xvas opened at 8:03 p.~n. Ms. Gamble presented that staffreport. There are four miscellaneous
code amendments for the Commission to consider:
A. Definition of ltigh-Density Residential Use, High-De~siO' Residential Zone, Low-DensiO, Use,
Lon,-DensiO, Zone, Medium DensiO, Use, and g4edium-DeuxiO' Zone- qhese definitions
provided in the Federal Wa), Cio~ Code (FWCC) are no~ consistent with the same words defined
in the Federal tffr~ Cbmprehensive Plan (FWCP). The proposed changes xvill bring the FWCC
into alignment with FWCP definitions. In addition, high-deosity residential use aod medium-
density use defiuitious would be removed from the FWCC becanse they are not referenced
auywhere in either the FWCC or FWCP.
B Keeping of Animalx The proposed changes will clari(v the applicability of the provisions for
keeping anhnals in FWCC Sections 22-981 to 22-987. and will identify auimals as an allowed
use in each of the FWCC zouing charts.
.......... ..............EXHIBIT.
Planning Commission Summary Page 4 July 17, 2002
C. Affordable Housing Regulations - It is necessary to delete the reference to "countywide
planning policies" in FWCC Section 22-967(b) because they do not "establish" specific
affordability numbers, just thresholds and policies.
D. Quasi-Judicial Rezones - Add the criterion that, "The rezone has merit and value for the
community as a whole" to FWCC Section 22-488(c)(2). The criterion is in keeping with
neighboring jurisdiction's rezone criteria.
There was no Public Testimony and very little Commission discussion. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:12
p.m. It was m/s/c (unanimous) to accept the staff recommendation and forward it on to the LUTC.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Ms. McClung gave the administrative report. The Commission hasn't met often because staffhas been working
on other studies (i.e., PAA study, downtown znarket study, and permit process). For the PAA study, an inventory
of the PAA has been completed. For the downtown market study, staff plans to present a compIeted study to the
LUTC at their second meeting in August. Updated statistics have become available and staff wants to ensure the
study is accurate. The stakeholders group has met three times on the permit process. There was a good response
to the survey. We have hired a consultant to look at our practices and those of other cities. The Department
reinstated Over the Counter Permits in April. It took awhile for the program to become popular, but now there is
a four-week wait for an appointment. In light of this, we have added two more appointment times for the summer
months. There will be a vote on housing targets next week. If all goes ~vell, the City's housing target will be
reduced. SEPA has been issued on the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Update. it will come to the Commission in
September. Single-family residential permits are up. Last year we issued 50 permits, currently this year we have
56 waiting for review. An Environmental Impact Statement will be done for Christian Faith Center. Pavilion
Centre II has an application in for upgrades and new stores. Work is being done on a number of high schools and
churches. Six Flags continues to expand Enchanted Parks. The number of land use applications currently exceeds
all past years. The Expansions of Nonconforming Residential Uses and Structures that the Commission dealt
with on May 15, 2002, have been adopted.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
None.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None.
ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:32 p.m.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS CODE AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE (FWCC)
RELATING TO DEFINITIONS OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES; CLARIFICATIONS TO PROVISIONS RELATING
TO THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS; CORRECTION TO THE DEFINITION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING; AND,
EXPANSION OF THE CRITERIA FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL PROJECT-RELATED REZONES
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
[] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE Amount Budgeted: $0
[] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING Expenditure Amt.: $0
[] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Contingency Req'd: $0
ATTACHMENTS: (1) Draft Ordinance to approve Miscellaneous Code Amendments; and (2) July 29, 2002
Memorandum to the Land Use/Tranportation Committee(LUTC)/Planning ComnUssion Recommendation with Exhibit I -
StaffReport to the Planning Commission for the meeting of July 17, 2002, Exhibit 2 - July 17, 2002 Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: As part of the Year 2002 planning Commission work program, Staffhas proposed code
amendments related to clarifications to amend the definitions of high-density residential use, high-density residential
zone, low-density use, low-density zone, medium-density use, and medium-density zone contained in Federal Way City
Code (FWCC) Section 22-1 to ensure consistency with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FV~CP) (Exhibit A of 1);
Clarifications to provisions related to the keeping of animals in zones where dwelling units are permitted (Exhibit B of 1);
clarification to the provision related to affordable housing contained within FWCC Section 22-976(b) (Exhibit C of 1);
and expansion of the decisional criteria for quasi-judicial project related rezones in FWCC Section 22488(c)(2) (Exhibit
D of 1). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 17, 2002, and forwarded the recommendation
shown in Exhibits A of 1 through D of 1 to the LUTC and City Council.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed proposed text amendments during a
public meeting on August 5, 2002. At that meeting, the LUTC made a motion to forward the proposed amendments to the
full Council on August 20, 2002.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move the proposed ordinance to second reading and approval at the next regular meeting on
September 17, 2002."
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
[] APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
[] DENIED Isx reading
[] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
[] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05110/2001
ORDINANCE NO. 02- ~ J/~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22
(ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO DEFINITIONS OF RESIDENTIAL DENSiTIeS; CLARIFICATIONS
TO PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS;
CORRECTION TO THE DEFINITION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING;
AND, EXPANSION OF THE CRITERIA FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL
PROJECT-RELATED REZONES
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July 1996, which significantly
revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter 22 (Zoning); and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendments to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), relating to
Definitions of Residential Densities; Clarifications to Provisions Relating to the Keeping of Animals; Correction to
the Definition of Affordable Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-Judicial Project-Related Rezones will
provide for improved review processes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the code amendments to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning),
relating to Definitions of Residential Densities; Clarifications to Provisions Relating to the Keeping of Animals;
Correction to the Definition of Affordable Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-Judicial Project-Related
Rezones are consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way' SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on the code amendments to FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), relating to Definitions of Residential
Densities; Clarifications to Provisions Relating to the Keeping of Animals; Correction to the Definition of
Affordable Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-Judicial Project-Related Rezones on May 15, 2002;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the code amendments
relating to Definitions of Residential Densities; Clarifications to Provisions Relating to the Keeping of Animals;
Correction to the Definition of Affordable Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-Judicial Project-Related
Rezones on July 17, 2002, and fonvarded a recoraraendation of approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use and Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered the
code amendments relating to Definitions of Residential Densities; Clarifications to Provisions Relating to the
Keeping of Animals; Correction to the Definition of Affordable Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-
Ord # , Page 1
Judicial Project-Related Rezones on August 5, 2002, following which it recommended adoption of the text
amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council considered the code amendments relating to Definitions of
Residential Densities; Clarifications to Provisions Relating to the Keeping of Animals; Correction to the Definition
of Affordable Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-Judicial Project-Related Rezones on August 20,
2002; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendments relating to Definitions of Residential
Densities; Clarifications to Provisions Relating to the Keeping of Animals; Correction to the Definition of
Affordable Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-Judicial Project-Related Rezones are consistent with
the intent and purposes of FWCC, Chapter 22 (Zoning), to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare of
the general public.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way
finds that the proposed code amendments will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or
welfare.
Section 2. Conclusions. Pumuant to FWCC Section 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set
forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the
decisional criteria for adoption of the proposal:
1. The proposed FWCC text amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the
following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies:
LUP4 Maximize efficiency of the development review process.
LUP6 Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to
improve upon the permit review process.
2. The proposed amendments relating to Definitions of Residential Densities; Clarifications to
Provisions Relating to the Keeping of Animals; Correction to the Definition of Affordable
Housing; and Expansion of the Criteria for Quasi-Judicial Project-Related Rezones bear a
substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because they will result in improved
review processes, by providing consistency between requirements and standards and clarification
for those using the code.
And
Ord # , Page 2
3. The proposed amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City because they will
clarify code provisions related to definitions of residential densities; clarify provisions relating to
the keeping of animals; correct the definition of affordable housing; and expand the criteria for
quasi-judicial project-related rezones. These amendments will provide certainty and consistency
to the review process while protecting surrounding properties, which is in the best interest of the
City's residents.
Section 3. Amendment. FWCC, Chapter 22, is amended as set forth in the attached Extfibit A, Exhibit B,
Exhibit C, and Exhibit D.
Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of
the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance,
or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this
ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as
provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day
of ,2002
APPROVED:
Mayor, Jeanne Burbidge
ATTEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Interim City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL~
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO:
File #02-101991-00-UP/Doc ID 19852
Ord # , Page 3
EXHIBIT A
22-1 Definitions.
High density residential zone~ means the following zones: RM 3.6, RM 2.4, RM 1.8, RS 5.0, RS 7.2, RS 9.6,
and comparable zones in other jurisdictions.
Low density use means a detached dwelling unit on a subject property that contains at least 7,200~.... ....... '~g~'fi~
five acres.
Low density zone means the following zones: SE, Pm XS.O, RS !5.0, R5 9.5, RS 7.2 and comparable zones in
other jurisdictions.
Medium density zones means the following zones: PC 5.9, p,,x.{ 2.5, RS 15.0, RS 35.0~ and comparable zones in
other jurisdictions.
Ord # , Page 4
EXHIBIT B
22-981 Application of division.
This division establishes special regulations that govern the keeping of animals in any zone where a dwelling unit is
permitted. The keeping of animals is permi~ed in any zone where a dwelling unit is permitted, subiect to the
provisions of this division. However, any provision of this division that is inconsistent with a specific provision
applicable to suburban estate zones does not apply in suburban estate zones. (Ord. No. 90-43, ~ 2(115.20(1)), 2-27-
90)
Add ~he below note to the following use zone charts:
22-596 - SE; Detached DU
22-613 - SE; Accessory DU
22-631 - RS; Detached DU
22-632 - RS; Attached DU
22-634 - RS; Manufactured Home Parks
22-648 - RS; Accessory DU
22-666 - PM; Detached DU
22-667 - RM; Attached, Detached, Stacked DU
22-668 - RM; Manufactured Home Parks
22-669 - RM; Senior Citizen Housing
22-725 - BN; Multiple-Unit Housing
22-756 - BC; Multi-Unit Housing
22-797 - CC-C; Multi-Unit Housing
22-809 - CC-F; Multi-Unit Housing
22-869 - BP; Senior Citizen Housing
For provisions that relate to the keeping of animals, see ,~ 22-981 et seq.
(See following page for exmnple of application of provision within the use zone chart, 22-596 - SE; Detached DU)
Ord # , Page 5
EXHIBIT C
22-976 Affordable housing regulations.
(a) Purpose. To provide affordable housing to the citizens of Federal Way and to comply
with the Growth Management Act and the county-wide planning policies for King County.
(b) Affordable housing defined. "Affordable housing" means dwelling units that are offered
for sale or rent at a rate that is affordable to those individuals and families having incomes that
are 80 percent or below the median county income. -~ .~..~.,:~u^~ :_ .~ ........... .:~^ ~,.~_:~
Ord # , Page 7
EXHIBIT D
22-488 Recommendation by the hearing examiner.
(a) Generally. After considering all of the information and comments submitted on the matter, the
hearing examiner shall issue a written recommendation to the city council.
(b) Timing. Unless a longer period is agreed to by the applicant, the heating examiner must issue the
recommendation within 10 working days after the close of the public hearing.
(c) Decisional criteria. The hearing examiner shall use the following criteria for quasi-judicial
rezones:
(1) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial nonproject rezone only if it finds that:
a. The proposed rezone is in the best interest of the residents of the city; and
b. The proposed rezone is appropriate because either:
1. Conditions in the tmmediate vicinity of the subject property have so significantly changed
since the property was given its present zoning and that, under those changed conditions, a
rezone is within the public interest; or
2. The rezone will correct a zone classification or zone boundary that was inappropriate when
established;
c. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan;
d. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by
reference from the comprehensive plan; and
e. It is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
(2) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial project related rezone only if it finds that:
a. The criteria in subsection (c)(1) of this section are met; and
b. The proposed project complies with this chapter in all respects; and
c. The site plan of the proposed project is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on the
developed properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; and
d. The site plan is designed to minimize impacts upon the public services and utilities.
e. The rezone has merit and value for the communit~ as a whole.
(d) Conditions and restrictions. The hearing examiner shall...
Ord # , Page 8
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
July 29, 2002
To: Eric Faison, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC)
VL~: David Mose~~anager
FROM: Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services
Jane Gamble, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Amendments To Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Relating To Definitions of
Residential Densities; Clarifications To Provisions Relating To The Keeping
Of Animals; Correction To The Definition Of Affordable Housing; and,
Expansion Of The Criteria For Quasi-judicial Project-related Rezones
A. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL
As part of the Year 2002 Planning Commission work program, staff has proposed code amendments
related to definitions of' residential densities; clarifications to the provisions relating to the keeping of
animals; correction to the definition o£affordable housing; and expansion of the criteria for quasi-
judicial Project-related rezones, q~he proposed code amendments would incorporate regulations into
Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 and clarify existing code provisions. The staff
recommendation to the Planning Commission is attached as Exhibit L.
B. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 17, 2002, at which time they
recommended approval of the code amendments as proposed by staff-for Exhibits A ofl, B ofl, and
C of l, and D of l.
Doc. I.O,
2. Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve the proposed code
amendments.
3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed code amendments.
Staffrecommends that the Committee recommend to the full Council adoption of the Planning
Commission's recommendations (Exhibit 2).
D. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading on ~ 2002,
as follows: f
As recommended by Planning Commission
As recommended by Planning Commission and amended by the LUTC
Approval of Committee Action:
ie Faison Michael par~c~~ Dean McColgan
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 StaffReport to the July 17, 2002, Planning Commission
Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Minutes
Exhibit 3 Draft Ordinance
STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Miscellaneous Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Amendments
Planning Commission Meeting of July 17, 2002
BACKGROUND
As part of tile Year 2002 Planning Commission work program, Staff has proposed code amcadmcnts
related to clarifications to amend the definitions of high-density residentiM use, /?igh-den.s'tO,
re.~idential zone, Iow-densiO, use, low-density zone, medil,n-densiO, use, and mecli~m~ ch'ns/0,
contained itl l;'edercd kTay Ct0* Code (FWCC) Section 22-1 to ensure consistency with tile
Way ('omprehe¢?stve Plcm (FWCP) (Ex,Sibi! A); Clarifications to provisions rclatcd to thc keeping of
animals itt zones whcrc dwelling units arc pcmfitted (Eyhibi!/J); clarification to thc ptoxision related
to affordable housing contained within FWCC Section 22-976(b) (Exhibit C); and cxpansion of thc
decisional critelia for quasi-judicial project rclatcd rezoncs in FWCC Scction 22-488(c)(2) (Exhibit 1))
A Dq/inition r{fhigh-de~siO~ residential use, high-densiO~ residential zone, Iow-de~z~iO'
..~e. lol~ densiO: zo~e, medium-densiO~ ltge, and l?ledllnll-densiO; zolle These
definitions provided in the FWCC are not consistent with thc same words as defined
ill thc FWCP
Thc ploposcd chaagcs will provide consistency between the FWCC and F\¥CP bx
bringing thc FWCC plans rote alignment with FWCP definitions Also, thc
definitions for high-density rexide~lial use and medium-de~zs'iO, use would be
removed from the FWCC bccause they are not rcfcrcnccd anywhere m eithc~ thc
FWCC or the FWCP
B Kee/.ng e/'Anima)v FWCC Sections 22-981 to 22-987 relate to thc provisions for
kccpmg mmnals in any zone where a dwelling unit is permitted The proposed
changes xxill clard~' the applicability of the provisions, and idcnti~, ammals as an
allowed usc in each zoning usc chart pursuant to FWCC Section 22-98 l.
C A//brdable Housing Regulations It is neccssaiT to dclctc the reference to
"countywide planning policies" that is included m FWCC Section 22-967(b) Thc
Counp¢;~ide Planniag Policies (CWPP) do not "establish" specific aflbrdabildy
mmlbcrs, just thresholds and policies
D {_)uasi_hMtcial Rezo~es - FWCC Section 22-488(c)(2) expands thc criteria lbr quasi-
judicial prqicct related rezoncs. The addition of thc criteria that, "The rezone has
met it and value tbr thc community as a whole," is in keeping with neighboling
lurisdiction's ~czonc criteria
EXHIBIT t
PAGE i OF
II REASON FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
FWCC Chapter 22,"Zon' ng, ' Amcle' IX, "Process VI Rev 'e'a,, ' estabhshes' a process and criteria for
zoning code text amendments. Consistent xvith Process VI rcview, the role of the Planning
Conmfission is as follows:
· To review and evaluate tile zoning code text regarding any proposed amendments:
· To dctcrmme wbctbcr thc proposed zoning code text amendment meets thc criteria
provided by FWCC Section 22-528; and,
· To forward a recommendatioa to Git5, Council regarding adoption of the proposed
zoning code text amendment.
Ill PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
May 15, 2002 Dctermmatiol~ of Nonsignificance pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA)
May 29. 2002 End of SEPA Comment Period
July 17, 2002 Public Hearing bcfore thc Planning Commission
IV DECISIONAL CRITERIA
FWCC Section 22-528 provides criteria for zoaing text amcndments Thc following section anal.x zcs
the compliance of the proposed zoning text amendments with the criteria provided by FWCC
Section 22-528 The City may amend thc text of the FWCC only d' it finds that:
1. The i)roposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
cotnprehensive plan;
Thc proposed FWCC text amendments related to amendment of thc FWCC definitions
density re,s'identia/ use, h~gh-densiO~ residenlial zone, tow-den.w? uxe, Iow-denxiO, zcn~e,
medmn~ den.vtty use, and medium-density zone to ensure consistency with thc FWCP.
clarification to provisions related to the kccpiag of animals in zones where dwelling units arc
permitted; clarification to the provision related to aflbrdable housing; and expansion of thc
criteria/bt quasi-judicial project related rezones, are consistent with, and substantially
implement, the following FWCP goals and policies:
LUll4 ~4(*ximize e[]iciency of the development review procesx.
LUI'6 ('ondttc't regular review.v of deve/o[; ~ e t 'e,k, /ctiion.~ [o dc'lorraine hon' m
EXHIBIT J
2. Tile proposed amendment bears a substantial relationsbip to public health, safety, or
welfare;
Tile proposed FWCC text amendments will clarify code provisions related to fllc definition of
density as it relates to rcsidential uses and zones; clarify code provisions related to the special
regulations that govern the keeping of animals; clarify the definition of affordable housing; and
expand the criteria for quasi-judicial project related rczones. These amendmeuts will provide
certainty and consistency to time review process while protecting surrounding properties, which
have a direct rclationship to the public health, safety, and welfare.
3. The proposed amendment is iu the best interest of Ibc residents of the city.
Thc proposed FWCC text amendments will clariS' code provisions related to the definition of
density as it relates to residential uses aud zoucs; clarify code provisions related to thc special
gcgulations that govern thc keeping ofauimals: clariS' thc dcfinitiou of affordable housing: and
expand thc criteria for quasi-judicial project rclatcd rczoncs. These amendments will proviclc
cellaret3 and consistcnc3 to tile review proccss xxhilc p~otcctmg surrotinding properties, which
is itl the best interest of the City's residents.
V PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Consistent with the provisions of' FWCC Section 22-539. the Planning Commission lll~/\' take thc
t~[Iowing actions regarding thc proposed zoning code tcxt alnendments:
I Recommend to City Council adoption of the FWCC text amendments as proposed;
2 Modit~, thc proposed FWCC text amendments and recommend to City Conncil
adoption of the FWCC text ameudments as modified;
3 Recommend to City Council that the proposed FWCC text amendments not bc
adoptcd: or,
4 Fm~vard thc proposed FWCC text ameudmcnts to City Council xxithout a recommendation
VI STAFF RECOMMENI)ATION
Thc following motion is suggcstcd:
Mox, e to recommend to thc City Council tbr adoption of the proposed FWCC text
amendments to clarify code provismns related to thc definition of thc density as it
~clatcs to residential uses and zones; clari~ code provisions related to thc special
regulations that govcm thc keeping ofaifimals; ckuifv thc dcfinitiou of aflbrdablc
housing: and expand thc criteria for quasi-judicial project related rczoncs. (Ifchangcs
occu~ as a lcsult of l)kmnmg Commission deliberations add, -.. as amcndcd b5 thc
Plaunmg Commissiou ')
VII EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Proposed code amendment clarifying prowsions related to the definition ofh~gh-
densiO~ residential use, high-density residential zone, low-densiO~ use, low-densiO~
zone, medi~m~-density use, and medium-dens'iO~ zone.
Exhibit B: Proposed code amendment clarifying provisions related to special regulations that
govern the keeping of animals.
Exhibit C: Proposed code amendment clarifying the definition of aflbrdable housing
Exhibit D: Proposed codc amendment expanding thc criteria roi a quasi~iudicial prqlCCt
related rezones.
EXHIBIT AA
EXHIBIT A
22- 1 Definitions.
......... g-4m~t .... a ~abject p. ,~,,~. u
vW, ic4~ eontains-atdeastq~g00 squase feet older-area per dwdtiag unk but r,o~morc thm~ 2,299
~ua~4~t of lot a;~er~ling~u~
Hix. h de.s~O; resi&nlzal zones ~neans the following zones: RM 3.6, RM 24, RM 1.8, RS 5
RS 7 2, RS 96~ and comparable zones in other jurisdictions.
Low denxily u.ve means a delached dwelling unit on a subject property that contains at least
7,200-square-feet five acres
Low dens-iO, zone means the following zones: SE,M~S~35 0, P~ 15.0~RS 96, RS 7.2 and
comparable zones in other jurisdictions
',vhiel~ eom, rains at lop. st 3,6~4quarc fcot-ef4ot area per dwelling unit but :'.otq~e-iha~ 7,199
squa~f'eet--ofqot-area-pcr dwelling unit
~/[edillln denxily zolle.'i means the following zones: P~o 5.0, PdVt4~o; RS 15.0, RS 35.0, and
comparable zones in other jurisdictions
EXHIBIT
PA E
EXHIBIT B
22-981 Application of division.
This division establishes special regulations that govern the keeping of animals in any zone where
a dwelling unit is permitted. The keeping of animals is permitted in an'/zone where a dwelling unit
is permitted, subject to the provisions of this division. However, any provision of this division that
is inconsistent with a specific provision applicable to suburban estate zones does not apply in
suburban estate zones. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(115.20(1)), 2-27-90)
Add the below note to the following use zone charts:
22-596 - SE; Detached DU
22-613 - SE; Accessory DU
22-631 - RS; Detached DU
22-632 - RS; Attached DU
22-634 - RS; Manufactured Home Parks
22-648 - RS; Accessory DU
22-666 - RM; Detached DU
22-667 - RM; Attached, Detached, Stacked DU
22-668 - RM; Manufactured Home Parks
22-669 - RM; Senior Citizen Housing
22-725 - BN; Multiple-Unit Housing
22-756 - BC; Multi-Unit Housing
22-797 - CC-C; Multi-Unit Housing
22-809 - CC-F; Multi-Unit Housing
22-869 - BP; Senior Citizen Housing
For provisions that relate to the keeping of animals, see § 22-981 et seq.
(See following page for example of application of provision within the use zone chart, 22-596 -
SE; Detached DU)
Miscellaneous FWCC Amendments File #02-101991-00-UP / Do~ ID ~94~n
Exhibit B / Page !
EXHIBIT
PAGE L.0 OF
EXHIBIT C
22-976 Affordable housing regulations.
(a) Purpose To provide affordable housing to the citizens of Federal Way and to comply
with the Growth Management Act and the county-wide planning policies for King County
(b) Affordable housing defined "Aflbrdable housing" means dwelling milts that are offered
for sale or rent at a rate that is affordable to those individuals and families having incomes that
are 80 percen! or below the median county income as estat)gshed4n~he-c4)m~tS~,videq~lamfing
polic4es
Miscclhmeous IWC(' Amcndmcnls ["ilo #(}2-1(1I 991 (10-Ut' / ~,,~ ri, ~,,,~
12×hibil (' };itgc I
EXHIBIT D
22-488 Recommendalion by the hearing examiner
(a) Gel~crally After considering ali of the reformation and comments submitted on the matter, the hearing
cxammcr shall issue a written recommendation to thc city council.
(b) Timing Unless a longer period is aL~ecd to by tl[c applicant, thc hearing examiner must issue thc
recommendation within 10 working days ahcr thc close of thc public hearing
(c) Decisional crilcria Thc hearing examiner shall use thc Following c~itc~ia For quasi-judicial rczones
(1) The city may approve an application for a quasi-judicial nonpro cci rezone only il' it finds that:
a The proposed rezone is m lhc best interest of thc residents of the city: and
b Thc proposed rezone ~s appropriate because cilhcr:
Conditions m thc immediate ;icimt5 oFthc subject propcrt5 have so sigmficantk, chm~gcd
since Ibc 9ropcHv was given its present zoning and'lhat, tmdc~ those changed conditions, a
rezone is within thc public iatcrcst; or
2 Thc rezone will correct a zone classificahon o~ zone bounding, that was inappropriate xxhcn
established;
c h is consislcnl wH[1 thc compi'chonsivc plan:
d It Is consistcm xxith all applicable prox isions of thc chaptc~, including those adopted by rcl~rcncc
fi'om thc comprchensixc plan; and
c It is constslcnl w~th thc public health, safety, and xxclfare
(2) Thc c~t5 ma5 approve an application For a quasiz[udicia] pro oct related rczo~ac only if' it finds that:
a Thc criteria in subsection (c)(l) oCdfis section arc met: and
b Thc proposed prq~cct complies w ~ this chapter tn all respects: and
c Thc site plan of dm proposed prqjcct is designed to minimize all adverse impacts on thc dcx clopo~t
p~opcmcs mtllc immcdiatc vicinity of thc subject )ropcrtx: ;md
d l'hc site plan ,s designed lo minimixc impacts upon lbo public scrxiccs and utilities
c Thc rcxonc has merit and value for thc conlnlunitv as a whole
(d) Conditions and rcslrictions. The hearing examiner shall
EXHIBIT ....
MEETING SUMMARY
Commissioners present: John Caulfield, Itope Elder, Bill Drake, Diui Duclos, [)ave Osaki, and Grant Newport.
Commissioners absent (excused): Nesbia Lopes. Alternate Commissioners present: None. Alternate
Colnmissioners absent (excused): Christine Nelson (Tony Moore and Maria Justus Foldi were also absent).
Councihnember present: Mayor Jeaune Burbidge. Staffpresent: Community Development Services Director
Kathy McClung, Associate Planner Deb Barker, Associate Planner Jane Gamble, City Attorney Bob Sterbauk,
aud Admiuistrative Assistant E. Tiua Piety.
Chair Caulfield called tile mccting to order at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF SUMMARY
The May 15, 2002, meeting summary was approved with two minor chauges: on page 2 trader Public Testimony,
tile second sentence, "Hi parents" should be "His parents"; and at tile bottonl of the page, tile meeting was
adjourned at 8:21, uot 7:21.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
None.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Moved to tile end of the meeting.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC ltEARING - Social Se~wices Transitional Housing Units Code Amendment
Tile Public [tearing was opeued at 7:05 p. m. Commissiouer Itope excused herself from this hearing because she
is a member of the Federal Way Community Caregiving Nctxxotk Board. Ms. Barker preseuted that staff report,
As part of its regular review of development regulations, stal'i'has ideutified tile ueed to ameud tile separation
requirement for social services lrat~xiliolla[ ho~txi.<.4 ~t~ils. Currently, 1.000 feet must be separate a social services
trausitioua[ housiug unit flora auy other social services traasitional housing unit. Stal/'researched five ways this
requiremeut could be amended:
a. Reduce tile 1,000 foot requirement to 400 feet for all zoning dislricts.
b. }).educe tile 1,000-1bot requircmcul to 400 [-eot I~)r only typo A social sci vices transitional
housing uuil m all ×oning clist~ icts.
EX:HIBtT,
Planning Commission Summary Page 2 July 17, 2002
c. Reduce the 1,000-foot requirement to 400 feet 0nly in the RM zoning district.
d. Reduce the 1,000-foot requirement to 400 feet for all Zoning districts that permit multifamily ·
dwelling units, provided that no more' than three social service transitional housing units per
multifamily complex can be established.
e. Eliminate the 1,000-foot separation requirement only iu the RM zoning district.
Staff recommends option c, "Reduce the 1,000-foot requirement to 400 feet only in RM zoning district." This
would allow a social services transitional housing unit to locate in a condominium where another exists, so long
as 400 feet separates tbem. This option reduces separation parameters in a limited but nonetheless valuable way,
and creates the least impact on the City as a whole.
The Commission asked why was a 1,000-foot separation origiually chosen? Staff replied that there is limited
background information and the reason for choosing 1,000 feet is not addressed. However, there is some case law
from another circuit court that discusses the therapeutic reasoning behind having a separation and 1,000 feet is
common iu other jurisdictions. It was asked why should there be any separation?
Staff indicated that currently, there are six social services transitional housing units (Type A) itl the City under
these provisions. (There may be others that started before these provisions came into affect, and there are some
other types of"group" homes itl the City.) Social services transitional housing units of this type have stringent
requirmnents. There is tbe 1,000-foot separation aud the unit is governed by a management plan submitted to the
City, which requires monitoring of those who live in the uuit. Another aspect governing the location (and number)
of these types of units is the cost ora condominium. FUSION (Friends United to Shelter the lndigeut, Oppressed,
and Needy) is the only provider of these units in tbe City. They bare informed the City that the need is great for
this type of housing, but because of the 1,000-foot separation, there is no affordable units left in the City.
When the provisions were first in place, there were many questions about the suitability of the units by others
living in the condominiums where the units ~vere placed. FUSION bas been responsible in answering questions
and monitors the units closely. They are quick to respond to problems. There are still some questions when a new
unit is proposed, but not as many. None of the applications for the six units were appealed.
The Public Testimony was opened at 7:30 p.m.
Linda Rasmussen, Regional Director of YWCA -lter agency contracts with FUSION to proved case
management to existing social services housing units. They have 27 unsolicited applications for oue
housing uuit. Their requests for snch housing are up 20 percent. She encouraged the Commissiou to
take the inost flexible approach. She told the Commission stories of some families aud hoxv haviug
secured housing has allowed theul to succeed.
Beverly Kim, FUSIONBoardmember - She stated that bomelessness is a buge social problem and the
need for housing is great. Caseworkers match the families to others residing iii the condominium. The
families receive weekly case management from the YWCA, who in turn sends a monthly report to
FUSION. Siuce they started providing this housing, FUSION discovered that many of the women had
problems with such issues as budgetiug. They now coutract with outside agencies/individuals to provide
advice/trainiug to the womeu on such issiics as budgetiug and how to be good neighbors and citizens.
Since starting theh' program, 75 perceut of those ou the program have fonnd permanent honsing. On
average, a family xvill stay in a social services transitional honsing uuit for six to twelve months.
EXHIBIT
Planning Commission Summary Page 3 July 17, 2002
Susie Horan, CoMwell Banker General Manager ~ They have helped purchase the six units. She is
familiar with the price range of condominiums and noted there are few units that.fit into the affordable
range. Of those that are affordable, there is now a social services transitional housing unit in each of
them. FUSION has volunteers ready to help provide another unit, but cannot do anything until the code
is changed. She stated that FUSION has become a model to other communities on how to provide this
type of housing. She would prefer tile Commission choose option e (eliminate the Ij000-foot
separation). Otber cities do not have setbacks and the restriction is not needed because there are
enougb people to oversee the prograin. Changing to a 400-foot separation may double the number of
units, but it also depends ou where itl the coadominium the current unit is situated (if it is in tile middle
oftbe condominium, tbere may not be 400 feet between it and any otber unit) and a unit must be for
sale that is 400 feet away from the current one.
Peggy LePorle, Founding Member of FUSION- She stated the need is great. FUSION is an all
volunteer organization. In their nine years of operation, there have been few problems. Problems thai
arise are dealt with immediately. They keep in contact with tbe bolneowners association, xvbo calls the
case manager if there are any problems. Ill 1993, the need was not as great and the 1,000-tbol
separation was not a problem. Now tbat the need for the housing has grown, tile 1,000-foot separation
has become a problem. If the need continues to grow, 400 feet may become a problem. If the
restriction remains in place, they will bave to purchase bigber cost units. This could mean a higher cost
to the City because tbey use Comlnunity Developmeat Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
Public Testimony xvas closed at 7:50 p.m. The Colnmission asked what is the risk to the City if the separation is
changed? Staffreplied it is a negligible risk. There have been relatively few problems. Staffquestioned
apartmeut maagers with these units and they said they have ahnost no problelns. Tbis does not mean that
problems will never happen.
The Public Hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m. It was m/s/c to accept the staffrecommendation and forward it on to
the Land/Use Transportation Committee (LUTC). Further discussion was beld on eliminating tbe separation
requirement, but it was felt tbat because of a current volatile situation, it is best to bave a separation requiremcnt.
PUBLIC HEAP. lNG Miscellaneous Code Amendments
The Public Hearing was opened at 8:03 p.m. Ms. Gamble presented that staff repo~l. There are four miscellaneous
code amendments for the Commission to consider:
A. Definition (~tfi&~h-DensiO~ Resident&d ~e, ttigh-Den,~iO' Resicte.~ial Zo.e, Low-De~siO~ U. se,
I. ow-DensiO~ Zone. Meclit,,-De,stO, U.~e. a,d Medium De,.si(v Zo,e These definitions
provided in the Federal Way CiO, Cocte (FWCC) are not consistent wilh tbe same words delined
in the Federal Way Co.q.'ehensive Pla. (FWCP). The proposed changes xvill bring the FWCC
into aligmnent with FWCP definitions. In addition, high-density residential use and medium-
density use definitions would be removed fi'om the FWCC because they are not rel~renced
anDvbere in either tbe FWCC or FWCP.
B. Keel;i.g of Animals The proposed changes will clarify the applicability of the provisions
keeping animals in FWCC Scctions 22-981 to 22-987, and will idenli[3, animals as m~ allowed
use in each of the FWCC zoning charts.
Planning Commission Summary Page 4 July 17, 2002
C. Affordable Housing Regulations - It is necessary to delete the reference to "countywide
planning policies" in FWCC Section 22-967(b) because they do not "establish" specific
affordability numbers, just thresholds and policies.
D. Quasi-dudicial Rezones - Add the criterion that, "The rezone has merit and value for the
community as a whole" to FWCC Section 22-488(c)(2). The criterion is in keeping with
neighboring jurisdiction's rezone criteria.
There was no Public Testimony and very little Commission discussion. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:12
p.m. It was m/s/c (unanimous) to accept the staffrecommendation and forward it on to the LUTC.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Ms. McClung gave the administrative report. The Commission hasn't met often because staff has been working
on other studies (i.e., PAA study, downtown market study, and permit process). For the PAA study, au inventor,x
of the PAA has been completed. For the downtown market study, staff plans to present a completed study to the
LUTC at their second meeting in August. Updated statistics have become available and staff wants to ensure the
study is accurate. The stakeholders group has met three times on the permit process. There was a good response
to the survey. We have hired a consultant to look at our practices and those of other cities. The Department
relustated Over the Connter Permits in April. It took awhile for the program to become popular, but noxv there is
a four-week wait for all appoiut~nent. In light of this, we have added two more appointment times for tile summer
montbs. There will be a vote oll housing targets next week. If all goes well, the City's housing target will be
reduced. SEPA has bceu issued Oll tile 2002 Comprehensive Plan Update. It will come to tile Commissiou in
September. Single-family residential permits arc up. Last year we issued 50 permits, currently this year we have
56 waiting for review. An EnvironmentaI hnpact Statement will be doue for Christian Faith Center. Pavilion
Centre II has ail applicatiou in for upgrades and new stores. Work is being done on a number of high schools and
churches. Six Flags continues to expand Enchanted Parks. The number of laud use applications currently exceeds
all past years. The Expansious ofNonconfornring Resideutial Uses and Structures that the Commission dealt
with on May 15, 2002, have been adopted.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Noue.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
ADJOURN
The meetiug was adjourued at 8:32 p.m.
MEETING DATE:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: South 288th Street at SR-99 Intersection Condemnation
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
[] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE Amount Budgeted: $
[-] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING Expenditure Amt.: $
[] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Contingency Req'd: $
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
On April 2, 2002, the City Council authorized staff to acquire right-of-way for the South 288t~ Street at SR-99 Signal and
Intersection Improvement Project (16t~ Avenue to 19th Avenue) for fair market value. Staff is currently contacting the
property owners to negotiate the purchases. In anticipation that some or all of the property owners will refuse to sell
because they dislike some aspect of the project, or because they want more money for their property, staff is requesting
that the Council adopt the attached condemnation ordinance. The draft ordinance authorizes the City Attorney to
commence legal proceedings to acquire the necessary properties by condemnation if the negotiation process fails after a
reasonable amount of time, in order to allow the project to proceed.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the condemnation ordinance to second reading and enactment at the next
regular meeting on September 17, 2002."
;i;~ MANAGER APPROVAL: ...... ~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
[] APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
[] DENIED 1sT reading
[] TABLED/DEFERREDfNO ACTION Enactment reading
[] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
oRDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE
CONDEMNATION, APPROPRIATION, TAKING AND/OR
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND/OR
EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING
AND INSTALLING RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS IN
THE VICINITY OF SOUTH 288TM STREET BETWEEN 16TM
AVENUE SOUTH AND 19TM AVENUE SOUTH, TOGETHER
WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND RELATED WORK
NECESSARY TO MAKE A COMPLETE IMPROVEMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY STANDARDS
ALL WITHIN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY; AND
DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO FILE ALL
NECESSARY ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THE
MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW FOR SAID
CONDEMNATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public Necessity. The public health, safety, necessity and convenience
demand that fight-of-way improvements be constructed and maintained within the City of Federal
Way within the vicinity of South 288th Street between 16th Avenue South and 19th Avenue South,
and that certain real property and/or easements upon property be condemned, appropriated, taken
and/or damaged for the construction of said improvements as provided by this ordinance. Failure to
construct such right-of-way improvements will cause traffic counts to continue to exceed capacity
within the corridor of South 288th Street between 16th Avenue South and 19th Avenue South, create
the potential for additional traffic and/or traffic/pedestrian accidents, and inhibit economic
ORD # , PAGE I
r 0'2...--
development within the Community Business commercial zones adjacent to the intersection of SR
9~ and South 288th Street.
Section 2. Public Use. The improvements demanded by public health, safety,
necessity and convenience consist of those improvements in substantially the form shown on the
Right-of-Way Plans dated April 19, 2002, by CH2MHill and on file with the City of Federal Way, to
wit: the construction of left turn lanes eastbound and westbound on South 288th Street at SR 99 and
at 8th Avenue South, sidewalks on both sides of South 288th Street west of SR 99, sidewalks and
planter strips on both sides of South 288th Street east of SR 99 from SR 99 to 19th Avenue South, and
modification of the sigmals at South 288th Street at SR 99 and at South 288th Street at Military Road
together with all appurtenances and related work necessary to make a complete improvement in
accordance with Figure III-3(a), Cross Section A and Figure IIi-3(i) of the City of Federal Way
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable City standards (the "Planned Improvements"). The
Planned Improvements will be a part o f right-of-way owned by the City o fFederal Way and open for
use by the general public, and therefore the use of property and/or easements condemned herein for
the construction of said improvements constitutes a public use.
Section 3. Condemned Property. The City Council of the City of Federal Way, after
reviewing the Planned Improvements, hereby declares that the property and/or easements located
within the City of Federal Way, legally described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference ("Property"), shall be and hereby are condemned, appropriated,
taken and/or damaged for the public use and purpose of constructing and maintaining the Planned
ORD # , PAGE 2
Improvements. The condemnation, appropriation, taking and/or damaging of the Property includes
th~ fight to make all necessary slopes for cuts and fills upon adjacent lands in the reasonable original
gradi/~g and maintenance of the right-of-way facilities, as well as temporary easements to enable
construction of the Planned Improvements. Further, the condemnation, appropriation, taking and/or
damaging of the Property shall be subject to the making or paying ofjust compensation to the owners
thereof in the manner provided by law.
Section4. Condemnation Legal Action. TheCityAttorneyorotherattomeyselected
by the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to file all necessary actions and proceedings
provided by law to condemn, take, appropriate and damage the Property in order to carry out the
provisions of this ordinance, and is further authorized in conducting said condemnation proceedings
and for the purpose of minimizing damages, to stipulate as to the use of the Property and as to the
reservation of any right of use to the Property owner(s), provided that such reservation does not
interfere with the use of the Property by the City as provided in this ordinance. The City Attorney is
further authorized to adjust the location and/or width of any of the Property and/or easements
condemned or taken therein in order to minimize damages, provided that said adjustments do not
interfere with the use of the Property by the City as provided in this ordinance.
Section 5. Severabilit¥. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and
severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this
ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect
the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or
ORD # _, PAGE 3
circumstances.
Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the
effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5)
days from and after its passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this __ day of
2002.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
iNTERiM CITY ATTORNEY,
PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDiNANCE NO.
ORD # ~, PAGE 4
Exhibit. "A"
S288th Street Improvements Project (16th Avenue South to 19th Avenue South)
Right of Way Acquisition
Condemnation List
PARCEL TO BE CONDEMNED
6a 332204-9037 Kinder-Care Learning Canters, [nc. Kinder-Care Learning Center
6c 332204-9119 Stanford R &. Gabriel G Poll Checkmate
6d 332204-9132 Reinhard Distributing Co. [nc. Ernies Trucks Stop Office Building
6e D42104-9024 S 288th Associates State Farm Insurance
6i 342104-9182 Ran Thi Nguyen Single Family Home
6j 042104-9261 Linda A. Landon Vacant property
RIGHT OF WA Y FROM PARCEL NO. 3322049037
THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A ", ~ YING SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST OF
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'A" WITH A LINE THAT IS
46.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTEBLINE OF SOUTH 285TM STREET, AS SURVEYED
B Y KING COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4-21-4-27;
THENCE SOUTH 88" 46' 28~ EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 139. 73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 2 ? ° 56' 25" EAST, 20. 15 FEET TO THE WES T MARGIN OF 18r~ A VENUE SOUTH AND
THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION.
CONTAINING 2,325 SOUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "A "
LOTS ! AND 3, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NO. 1277090, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY
RECORDING NUMBER 7806281014, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SURVEYORS NO TE:
THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET IS BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WAY PLANS FOR SOUTH 288'~
STREET A T PACIFIC HIGHWAy SOUTH (SR 99), ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC
WORKS.
parcel 3322049037. doc
~ PR~_~ERTY LIN~ ~
(3322049109) I ~
AREA = 2, J25 &F. 4&00 [r
~ E~IS~NG ROW C/L PER
K.C, SURLY 4-21-4-27 S. 288TH ST.
EXHIBIT MAP
PARCEL 5~220~9057 ROW TAK~
FEB. 2002 ACAD No. 5522049057
E Afl T" ~) T~ E C H
RIGHT OF WA Y FROM PARCEL NO. 3322049119
THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A", LYING SOUTH AND SOUTHWEST OF
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING A T THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL ~A ' WITH A LINE THAT IS
46.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 2BBTM STREET, AS SURVEYED
BY KING COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4-21-4~27;
THENCE NORTH 88° 46' 28* WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 58.36 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 40° 02' 30' WEST, 27.43 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89° 59' 17 ~ WEST, 23.40 FEET TO THE EAST MARGIN OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH
(SR 99) AND THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION.
CONTAINING 1, 795 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "A "
THE WEST 100 FEET OF THAT PORT/ON OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1:
EXCEPT THE NORTH 1084. 76 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 6641477;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER B 704150548.
SURVEYORS NO TE:
THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 255TM STREET IS BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WA Y PLANS FOR SOUTH 285
STREET A T PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (SR 99), ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC
WORKS.
~..~ ~ o
parcel 3322049119. doc
I' 50'
~1 , 4+03.94
[~s~ ~ow C/L ~[R S. 288TH SF
I
/
~ SEC. 4. r 21N.. R. 4 E., W.U. ~
EXHIBIT MAP
PARCEL JJ22049119 ~OW TAHE
E A R T H ~ T E C H
RIGHT OF WA Y FROM PARCEL NO. 3322049132
THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A ", LYING SOUTH, SOUTHEAST AND
SOUTHWEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING A T A POINT ON THE WEST MARGIN OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH {SR 99), SAID POINT
BEING 61.14 FEET NORTH OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET, AS
SURVEYED BY KING COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4-21-4-27;
THENCE NORTH 89° 59' 18" WEST, 11.81 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 29° 21 ' 29" WEST, 33.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 86° 01' 53" WEST, 82.47 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88° 40' 47" WEST, 2. 19 FEET; '
THENCE NORTHWESTERLy ALONG .,4 NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE RADIAL CENTER
BEARS NORTH 25° 24' 16' EAST, 83.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 85. 10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05 ° 51' 02~ WEST, 10.30 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'A
THENCE NORTH 88° 46' 28" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 1.55 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID PARCEL 'A ~ AND THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION.
CONTAINING 1,810 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "A"
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 236 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. I (ALSO KNOWN AS PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH):
EXCEPT THE NORTH 136 FEET;
AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET;
ANO EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 7108310550;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY BY DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8704230164;
.AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN 16TH AVENUE SOUTH.
SURVEYORS NO TE:
THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET IS BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WA Y PLANS FOR SOUTH 288TM
STREET A T PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (SR 99), ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC
WORKS.
parcel $32204912,2.doc
(J322049~58)
5 50+Jg. J1 0322049130 52+61.75
c> . EXI$TflNG
I L = 144.73' ~ ROW
EXHIBIT NAP
PARCEL JJ22049132 ~OW TAHE
FEB. 2002 ACAD No, 33220~9132
RIGHT OF WA Y FROM PARCEL NO. 0421049024
THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL ~A', LYING NORTH AND NORTHEAST OF
THE FOLL 0 WING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING A T A POINT ON THE WEST MARGIN OF PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (SR 99), SAID POINT
BEING 55.36 FEET SOUTH OF AND PERPENDICULAR TO THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET, AS
SURVEYED BY KING COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4-21-4-27;
THENCE NORTH 89° 59' 17" WEST, 12.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 28° 30' 30" WEST, 36.41 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 24.00 FEET
SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET, AS SURVEYED BY KING
COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4-21-4-27;
THENCE NORTH 88°46` 28" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 51.83 FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A NON- TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE RADIAL CENTER BEARS
NORTH 05° 54' 39' EAST, 320.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 36. 13 FEET TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF
SOUTH 288TM STREET AND THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION.
CONTAINING I, 166 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "A "
THE NORTH 205 FEET OF THE EAST 202.42 FEET OF THE WEST 222.42 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4,
SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN PSH NO. 1, AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 2118246;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION L TING WITHIN SOUTH 265TM STREET;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER B 707270422.
SURVEYORS NO TE:
THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288'~ STREET IS BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WA Y PLANS FOR SOUTH 285TM
STREET A T PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (SR 99), ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC
WORKS. ~~
EX~'m£~ 10-01-o'~
parcel 042 I049024.doc ~ ~ '2- ~ --o ~
\ [ CONSTRUCTION
52+~
.... ROW
51+55.45
' PROPOSED ROW ~ ~'
AREA = 1,166 S.F. 52+52.41 /
52+64.40
/
55.~6' RT
EXHIBIT MAP
PARCEL 0421049024 ROW 7A~E
RE~ FE~. 25. 2002 ACAD No. 042~049024
RIGNT OF WA Y FROM PARCEL NO. 04210491,92
THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A ", LYING NORTH AND NORTHWEST OF
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL XA' WITH A LINE THAT IS
46.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288r'~ STREET, AS SURVEYED
BY KING COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4-21-4~27;
THENCE NORTH 88° 46' 28" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 91.64 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 45° 21' 48' WEST, 3.73 FEET TO THE EAST MARGIN OF 18TM AVENUE SOUTH AND
THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION.
CONTAINING 1,395 SOUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "A#
THE NORTH 110 FEET OF THE WEST 95 FEET OF THE EAST 10,1. 19 FEET OF THE WEST 789. 19 FEET OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON:
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD PURPOSES;
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A CIRCLE HA VlNG A
RADIUS OF 25 FEET, WHICH IS TANGENT TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 1BTH AVENUE SOUTH AND
TANGENT TO A LINE 30 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 258TM
STREET;
TOGETHER WITH
LOT I, MEREDITH VlEWADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 55 OF
PLATS, PAGE 61, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON:
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 71 FEET THEREOF.
SURVEYORS NO TE:
THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET IS BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WAY PLANS FOR SOUTH 288
STREET A T PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (SR 99}, ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC
'WORKS.
porcel 0421049 ~82.doc ~, ~"2~ -0 ~.~
· SEC. $5, T. 22 N., R. 4 E., W.I,,L
,- S, 288TH ST.
58+00 S 88'46'28~ E 59+00
EXISTING ROW C/L PER
~1 I ~.~7' ~r ~.oo'
N.T.S.
SEC.
EXHIBIT MAP
PARCEL 04210~9182 ROW TAKE
EEB. 2002 ACAD No. 0~2~0~9~82
RIGNT OF WA Y FROM PARCEL NO. 0421049261
THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A", LYING NORTH OF A LINE 46.00 FEET
SOUTH OFAND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET, AS SURVEYED BY KING
COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4 21-4-27.
CONTAINING 1,450 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "A "
LOT I, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 580076R, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED
UNDER RECORDING NUMBER BI 10290521, BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SECTION 4,
TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SURVEYORS NOTE:
THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH £88~H STREET IS BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WA Y PLANS FOR SOUTH 288TM
STREET A T PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (SR 99), ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WA Y PUBLIC
WORKS.
parcel 0421049261.doc
//-- [X*SnND ~OW CA PER S, 288TH ST. I
~ -- -~- K.C. SURVeys_. · ~-21-4-2756+1 I
I
57+00
--IO0 ~ -- -- I -- ~ -J_ _. I -- -
I
S 88'46'28' E
ROW ~ PROPOSED ROW ~KE 7
I
46,00' R~ .
(0421049115) [ ~ [
SEC.
EXHIBIT MAP
PARCEL 0421049261 ~OW ~AKff
FEB. 2002 ACAD ~o. 042t04~26~
RIGFIT OF WAY £ROM PARCEL NO. 0421049261
THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A", LYING NORTH OF A LINE 46.00 FEET
SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET, AS SURVEYED BY KING
COUNTY SURVEY NUMBER 4-2 I-4-27.
CONTAINING 1,450 SOUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL "A "
LOT 1, K/NG COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 5BOO76R, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED
UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8110290521, BEING A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SECTION 4,
TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., /N KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SURVEYORS NO TE:
THE CENTERUNE OF SOUTH 288TM STREET IS BASED ON THE RIGHT OF WA Y PLANS FOR SOUTH £88TM
STREETAT PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (SR 99), ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC
WORKS.
parcel 0421049261.doc
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2002 ITEM#
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT: Cancellation of September 3, 2002 Regular Council Meeting
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
[] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE Amount Budgeted: $
[] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING Expenditure Amt.: $
[] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Contingency Req'd: $
ATTACHMENTS: None
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The City Council will discuss the possibility of canceling their regular meeting on
September 3, 2002. If Councilmembers recommend cancellation, a motion to suspend Council Rules of Procedure to
cancel the meeting is required.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to suspend Council Rules of Procedure for the purpose of canceling the September 3,
2002 regular meeting"
(BELOtY TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
[] APPROVED COUNCIL BILL #
[] DENIED 1s* reading
[] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION Enactment reading
[] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/200~