Council PKT 01-15-2002 Special/Regular
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
January 15, 2002
(www.cifederal.wav.wa.us)
*****
SPECIAL SESSION - 5:00 p.m.
I.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
ARTS COMMISSION INTER VIEWS
II.
III.
ADJOURNMENT
*****
REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m.
1.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III.
PRESENTATIONS
a.
b.
Outgoing Mayor and Deputy Mayor Recognition
City Manager/Introduction of New Employees
City ManagerÆmerging Issues:
c.
Oxford House Update
Staff Report
City Council Questions
Citizen Comment (remarks limited to 3minutes per person)
City Council Discussion
(Note: Oxford House Update Packet will be available to public on
Monday, January 14,2002)
over please. . .
IV.
v.
a.
b.
c.
VI.
a.
b.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
a.
X.
CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING.
Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor. please come forward to the
podium. adjust the microphone to proper height. and state your name for the record. PLEASE LIMIT
YOUR REMARKS TO THREE {3 MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue
too long, relate negatively to other individuals. or are otherwise inappropriate.
CONSENT AGENDA
(Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought
before full Council for approval; all items will be enacted by one motion; individual items may be removed
by a Counci/member for separate discussion and subsequent motion.)
Minutes/January 2 2002 Regular Meeting
Voucher
Monthly Financial ReoortlNovember 2001
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Mayoral Appointments to Council & Regional Committees
Arts Commission Appointments
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Potential LitigationIPursuant to RCW 42.30.110(l)(i)
ADJOURNMENT
.. THE COUNCIL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA"
THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND
ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW-FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LIBRARY"
YCa)
MEETING DATE:
January 15, 2002
ITEM#
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
CATEGORY:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
BUDGET IMPACT:
~ CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the regular City Council meeting held on Jaunary 2,2002
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for pennanent records pursuant to RCW
requirements.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nla
PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye approyal of the meeting minutes of the City Council regular meeting held January 2,
2002."
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~\
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05110/2001
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
January 2, 2002 - 7:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Qv.þ.f'\
Minutes
I.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Councilmember Park called the meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the
hour of 7:07 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Councilmembers Dean McColgan, Mary Gates, Mike Park,
Michael Hellickson, and Councilmembers-Elect Jeanne Burbidge, Linda Kochmar, and
Eric Faison.
Staff present: City Manager Dayid Moseley, City Attorney Bob Sterbank, City Clerk
Chris Green, and Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney.
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
City Manager David Moseley led the flag salute.
III.
SWEARING-IN CEREMONY
COUNCILMEMBERS-ELECT
Jeanne Burbidge, Eric Faison and Linda Kochmar
City Clerk Chris Green administered the oath of office to Councilmembers Jeanne
Burbidge, Eric Faison, and Linda Kochmar.
IV.
SELECTION AND SWEARING-IN CEREMONY
MAYOR AND DEPUTY MAYOR
Councilmember Park opened nominations for Mayor.
COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED THE NOMINATION OF
COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE FOR THE POSITION OF MAYOR.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 2, 2002 - Page 2
There were no further nominations.
COUNCILMEMBER MCCOLGAN MOVED TO CLOSE THE NOMINATIONS;
COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed 6-1 as follows:
Burbidge
Faison
Gates
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
no
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
The main motion to appoint Councilmember Burbidge as Mayor passed 6-1 as follows:
Burbidge
Faison
Gates
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
no
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
City Clerk Chris Green administered the oath of office to Mayor Jeanne Burbidge.
Councilmember Park opened nominations for the position of Deputy Mayor.
COUNCIL MEMBER KOCHMAR MOVED NOMINATION OF
COUNCILMEMBER MCCOLGAN FOR THE POSITION OF DEPUTY MAYOR.
There were no additional nominations.
COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS;
COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON SECOND. The motion passed 7-0 as follows:
Burbidge
Faison
Gates
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
The main motion to appoint Councilmember McColgan as Deputy Mayor passed 7-0 as
follows:
Burbidge
Faison
Gates
Hellickson
yes
yes
yes
yes
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 2, 2002- Page 3
City Clerk Chris Green administered the oath of office to Deputy Mayor Dean
McColgan.
At 7:25 p.m., Councilmember Park recessed the regular meeting for approximately
fifteen minutes for a brief reception for the elected officials.
At 7:40 p.m. Mayor Burbidge reopened the regular meeting.
V.
PRESENTATIONS
a.
City Manager/Introduction of New Employees
City Manager David Moseley announced and welcomed new employee Erl Parloya, who
has been hired as a combination inspector for the Community Development
Department/Building Division.
b.
City Manager/Emerging Issues
City Manager David Moseley announced that there were no emerging issues to report.
VI.
CITIZEN COMMENT
David McKenzie, Myla Montgomery, Judith Carlson, Bob Dahl, Tom Jackman, Joan
Tabrum, Embry Owen, Dean Owen, Kathy Frankin, Dayid Morris, Mike McLead, Lisa
Wilhelm, Betty Wick, Vicki Knutsen, Glen Steele, Tom Melmon, Harry Reichenburg,
Charmaine Marshall, and Dick Taylor spoke to Council in opposition to an Oxford House
locating to Twin Lakes.
Joe Dion, Dave Peterson, William Walker, Margaret Stergall, Gregory Eklund, Darleen
Cady, Tom & Crystal Moehlman, and Dorthy Le, asked to haye written comments read
into the record in opposition to an Oxford House locating in Twin Lakes.
Bill May requested a liaison between the city staff and the yarious Homeowners
Associations in Federal Way.
Mayor Burbidge asked City Manager Dayid Moseley to respond to the citizen comments
regarding Oxford House.
Mr. Moseley briefly responded to Council, proyiding clarification to (I) the city's
issuance of an administratiye clarification not variance, and (2) he noted the city has no
authority to enforce Homeowners Associations Rules and Regulations. He also fully
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 2, 2002 - Page 4
committed to research and report back on all questions raised by Councilmembers and
citizens at tonight's meeting.
COUNCIL MEMBER HELLICKSON MOVED TO AMEND TONIGHT'S
AGENDA TO INCLUDE OXFORD HOUSE DISCUSSION UNDER COUNCIL
BUSINESS; COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SECOND. The motion passed 7-0 as
follows:
VII.
Burbidge
Faison
Gates
Hellickson
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
CONSENT AGENDA
a.
b.
Minutes/December 18, 200 I Regular Meeting -Approved
Council Bill #290/Code Revisions for Solid Waste &
Recycling/Enactment Ordinance -Approved Ordinance #02-411
Council Bill #29l/Extension of City Solid Waste Utility in Annexed
Areas/Enactment Ordinance Approved Ordinance #02-412
Council Bill #292/Portion of Milton Road South Street
Vacation/Enactment Ordinance Approved Ordinance #02-413
City Manager Contract Amendment -Approved
Teamsters Collectiye Bargaining Agreement -Approved
c.
d.
e.
f.
COUNCILMEMBER PARK MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
AS PRESENTED; COUNCIL MEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed as
follows:
VIII.
a.
b.
Burbidge
Faison
Gates
Hellickson
Kochmar
McColgan
Park
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
City Council Committee Appointment Considerations -No Action Taken
Oxford House Disscussion -Added Item
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 2,2002 - Page 5
After a brief discussion, Councilmembers concurred to place this item on the January 15th
City Council Agenda under emerging issues. Mayor BUlbidge requested City Manager
Dayid Moseley to giye a staff report in response to the citizen's concerns stated at
tonight's meeting.
Ix.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Gates updated Council on upcoming yarious regional committees.
Councilmember Kochmar thanked citizens for bringing their concerns to tonight's
meeting, and reported on recent actiyities with the Airport Communities Coalition.
Councilmember Park extended his congratulations to Mayor BUlbidge and Deputy Mayor
McColgan.
Councilmember Hellickson had no report this eyening.
Councilmember Faison had no report this eyening.
Deputy Mayor McColgan reminded citizens of the upcoming retreat, which will be held
in Federal Way and encoUlaged citizens to attend.
Mayor BUlbidge announced upcoming local and community events in the arts.
x.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager announced the Ci~ Council would be having their annual retreat at Dumas
Bay Centre, January II th and 12 . The Council will be discussing various items including
capital facilities, police development reyiew, and council rules ofprocedUle.
Mr. Moseley also reminded citizens of the annual Martin Luther King Jr. celebration on
Monday, January 21 st at DecatUl High School. This year's theme is "Building Bridges-
Breaking Barriers...Shaping the Dream"; the program begins at 10:30 a.m.
He updated Council, noting the Leonhardt Group is in the process of conducting citizen
focus groups as they continue to work forward in the branding process.
City Manager Dayid Moseley further reminded Council of the need for an executiye
session for the purpose of discussing Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW
42.30.ll0(l)(b); for approximately twenty minutes with no action anticipated.
Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
January 2, 2002 - Page 6
XI.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.11 O(l)(b)
At 9:25 p.m. Mayor Burbidge announced the Council would be recessing to executiye
session for the purpose of discussing Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW
42.30.110(1 )(b).
After a brief extension, Council returned to Chambers at 9:56 p.m.
XII.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor
Burbidge adjourned the regular meeting at 9:56 p.m.
Stephanie Courtney
Deputy City Clerk
MEETING DATE:
January 15,2002
ITEM# 1T[b)
---------------------
-------------------------
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
VOUCHERS
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
i:8I CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$1,521,182.85
$1,521,182.85
$
----------------
-------------------------------------
ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST
----------------------
------------------------
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND:
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of peljury that the materials haye been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor perfonned as cribed herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of
Federal Wa Washington, I am a 'zed to authenticate and certify said claims-
------
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Approye attached youchers pursuant to RCW 42.24
----------------
PROPOSED MOTION: I moye approYal of Vouchers-
~~~~;;-¡;;~~~~~~--~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
-----------------
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
P vchlst
12/l2/2001 15,57,50
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = === == = ~ == = = = = = == = == = = = = = = = = = = = = ==== = ==== === = === = = = = == = = = = == = == = ~ = = = = = = = ~ = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == ==
v~ucher ~ Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount
163501
12/03/2001 001411 POSTAL EXPRESS INC
nU---UU- uunUU UU_h__-U_uuuuuu__uuu- uUu_uu- _uuuuu- uu_--_uuuu_--_uu_u__u uuu_u_hu-
163502
12/03/2001 006054 BRANDRUD FURNITURE, INC
163503
12/03/2001 000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUES
163504
12/03/2001 000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE
BM211-4&2109 043278
111401-7
OCT 2001 FEE
PET-OCT2001
163505
12/03/2001 001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS F OCT FEES
163506
12/03/2001 703053 BARRETT, MICHAEL
163507
12/05/2001 000947 YOUR INC DBA
163508
12/05/2001 000947 YOUR INC DBA
01-01-000257
2697
2696
045512
043037
042884
MSMD- POSTAGE & DUPLICATION/COUR
503 -11 00- 043- 512 - 50-42 5
503-11 00- 043- 518 - 92-42 5
503-1100- 043 - 521- 99-42 5
PWD-OFFICE CHAIRS
101-4200 - 22 0 - 54 3 - 3 0 - 352
MSF-REMIT STATE FEES
001- 0000- 000-23 7 -35- 000
001- 0000- 000- 23 7-41- 000
001- 0000- 000- 23 7-42- 000
001- 0000- 000- 23 7-44- 000
001- 0000- 000-237-46- 000
001.0000- 000-237-47 - 000
001- 0000- 000-36 9 -81- 000
MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES
001- 0000- 000- 23 7 - 70- 000
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM FEES-OCT
001- 0000 - 000- 23 7 -43 - 00 0
MSRM-CLAIM#Ol' 01- 000- 257
501-1100- 043- 514 - 91-4 95
PKM-JANITORIAL SERVICES
505 -11 0 0 - 331- 5 7 6 -1 0 - 415
505-11 0 0 - 331- 576 - 8 0 - 415
PS-JANITORIAL SERVICES-NOV
001- 21 00 - 0 94 - 521-11-415
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
1,804.95
7,867.34
1,816.66
11,488.95
326.40
326.40
153.00
30,189.64
15,391.88
6,815.47
2,684.85
1,371.99
0.01
56,606.84
488.00
488.00
1,156.91
1,156.91
907.39
907.39
300.00
330.00
630.00
1,305.00
1,305.00
_u- - _u - - - ----- --- ---- - ----.- - _u- -_u_-- -------_u_-__U___hU----_u_u_-_uu.___h_--U------- -----------------_u_u____h_h
Page, 1
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,57,55
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 2
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
= == = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = == == = === == ==== === ===== == === = ==== = == ===== = = = = ===== = = = === = = ==== = = = = == = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = =
Amount
Description/Account
--__----__h_--
------------ ---------- ---------------------------------- u-----_u_- ---_u_u_-- u--_u_---------
163509
12/05/2001 001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE SVC #734/-DEC PS 042911
163510
12/05/2001 005254 U S BANCORP
496005676064
163511
12/12/2001 000014 DAY-TIMERS INC
34506
045536
163512
12/12/2001 000029 KING BELLMARK OF PUGET SOUN 020518
045572
163513
12/12/2001 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY
032131
032017
031880
163514
12/12/2001 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 130132
132134
163516
12/12/2001 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC
177-159-1003
PS- 9TH AVE BLDG LEASE
001-2100- 0 94 - 521-11-4 52
PS-MONTHLY VISA CHGS
001-2100- 092 - 521- 31- 318
001-2100- 093 - 521-26 -432
001-2100- 093 - 521-26 -433
001- 21 0 0 - 0 93 - 521- 27 -4 32
001-2100 - 093 - 521- 27 -436
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 318
001-2100-111- 521-22- 312
PWA-CALENDAR FILLER
101-4200-210- 543 -10-310
CDB - PRE INKED STAMP
001- 5200- 074 - 559- 6 0 - 312
PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER
001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 22 - 34 0
001-2100-111- 521- 22 -48 0
PS-RESP MSA CARTRIGES
001- 2100-111- 521- 22 - 34 0
001-2100-111- 521-22 -48 0
PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER
001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 22 - 34 0
001-2100-111- 521- 22-48 0
PWS-SPRAY PAINT
101-4400- 24 0 - 542 -3 0- 3 51
SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLY
401-3100- 64 0- 542 -4 5-319
PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES
001- nOO-333 - 576-8 0-4 n
001- nOO-333 - 576 - 80-4 72
505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 518 - 3 0 -4 n
20,345.92
Total,
20,345.92
189.98
311.94
36.00
0.50
97.67
37.98
78.27
Total,
752.34
35.89
Total,
35.89
29.08
Total,
29.08
7.33
7.32
214.83
214.83
89.52
89.51
Total,
623.34
19.73
8.69
Total,
28.42
5.47
1. 00
1. 00
- - - - --- - - - - -- - -- --- - - - ---- - - - - -- - - - - ---- _uu_u --- uh -------
- -- -- - - --- - - ---- - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - ------- - ----
Page, 2
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,57,57
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 3
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
Amount
----u_uu- -_u__uu _h_uuuu_uuh_-_uuu_uh- --_u__u_u uu_----u- -
uuuu_uu_-
128.255-3948
505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 518 - 3 0 -4 72
505-11 0 0 - 331- 576 -1 0 - 4 71
505-11 00-331- 576 - 8 0-4 71
505-11 00-331- 576 - 8 0 -472
PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES
001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 71
PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES
001.7100-333 - 576 - 80 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300- 23 0- 543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230 - 543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300- 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101- 43 00-23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300.230 - 543 -10 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230 - 543 -1 0-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -4 71
PKDBC/KFT- ELECTRICITY
402-72 00-101- 575-45-4 71
402 -72 00-352 - 575-4 5-4 71
PKDBC/KFT- ELECTRI CITY
402 - 72 00-101- 575-45-471
402 - 7200-352 - 575-45-471
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101.4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0 - 4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
163516
12/12/2001 (Continued)
954-567-1001
5.47
954-567-1001
5.47
342-691-1008
93.97
996-289-0001
130.62
352-691-1007
25.80
904-388-1003
137.41
738-448 -1003
58.64
131'066-1002
10,660.33
638.448-1005
78.19
536.673-1007
232.20
442.691-1006
25.80
190- 977 - 0008
753-129-1008
185.87
110.52
736-169-1004
143.36
993-440-2000
215.82
004-919-1000
32.91
311-112-7001
1,346.22
673.10
727-469-1000
1,393.45
696.71
699-699-1003
5.47
506.54
183-469-1006
147.01
183-469-1006
- - -- - - - - - - - - - - u - - _u u - u- -- u - - - uu- - uu_-
- ------ ------ ------ ------ --- ------
Page, 3
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,57,57
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 4
""""" ~"""""" ~""" ~ ~ =~""~" ~""""" ~ ~"""= =" ~== == = = ="~= = ====== = ~=~ === = ==~=== = = =="=== = = === = ~~= == = = = == ~ == == = = = ~== = = = = == = = = = = = = == = = ==
==== = ===
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Description/Account
Amount
--- dU-U- u_u__u- -_uuuu_---_u_uu
u- u-_uu__u u_-_uu_u u_uu_u_uuuu_uuuuu- u
128-255-3948
101-4300-230- 543-10-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230-543 -10-471
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300- 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300- 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
MC-FACILITY ELECTRICITY
505-1100- 331- 512 - 50-471
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230 - 543 -10 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300- 230-543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 - 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 - 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543-10-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 - 23 0 - 54 3 -1 0 - 4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0 -4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PWT- STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-471
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 71
PWT-STREET LIGHTING
101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71
PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-4 71
147.01
163516
12/12/2001 (Continued)
472-400-1005
72 .43
895-405-1002
152.62
252-150-2001
102.26
241-985-1007
192.10
525-940-2005
231. 80
233-930-2008
147.70
112-722-1008
236.03
925-940-2007
225.41
221-220-2002
5.47
889-288-1007
59.59
344 .75
625-940-2003
121-220-2004
6.15
886-203-1005
101.92
604-130-2008
257.33
652-017-1007
149.56
497-198-1008
110.23
225-650-2002
189.54
786-203-1007
106.08
487-650-2008
257.58
669-650-2001
380.69
420-530-2005
96.86
309.87
330-694-9979
223.62
168-847-1000
202.23
---- - - - - - - - -- - - u - - - _u u- ._u - u__u" - u_- u u--- _u_----
u--- - u - _u_- _u u - - u- - - -.u - - - _u- - - uu
Page, 4
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,57,58
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 5
0 ~ = 0 = = = = = 0 = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = == === === = = = = == ==== = = = ===== = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = === = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = =
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Description/Account
Amount
_u__uu_u -_u._u_- uuu--------_uu_--_u__u----- uuuu__u
-- .u--uu_uu_----_uuu----- uuuu_uuu
163516
12/12/2001 (Continued)
504-228-1005
PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES
001- 7100-333- 576- 80-4 71
PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES
001- 7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 71
1,834.36
303-218-1004
0.01
Total,
23,065.55
163517
12/12/2001 000058 SOUND OFFICE SUPPLY
10326
045556
CDB - MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
001- 5200- 074 - 559- 60-310
50.23
Total,
50.23
163518
12/12/2001 000089 NEWS TRIBUNE
420708
045577
PS-NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
001-2100- 094 - 521- 3 0-311
27.00
Total,
27.00
3075301
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001. 7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 73
PWS-WATER SERVICE
101-4400-240- 543 -10-4 73
PWS-WATER SERVICE
101-4400-240- 543 -10 -4 73
PWS-WATER SERVICE
101-4400- 24 0- 543 -1 0 -4 73
PWS-WATER SERVICE
101-4400-240- 543 -10-4 73
PWS-WATER SERVICE
101-4400- 24 0 - 54 2 - 3 0 - 4 7 3
PKDBC-SEWER SERVICE
402 - 72 0 0 -1 01- 575- 4 5 - 4 74
402 - 72 0 0 - 3 52 - 57 5 -4 5 - 4 74
PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS
505-1100-331- 518 - 30.473
505 -11 00- 331- 518 - 3 0 -4 74
PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS
001- 71 00- 33 6 - 5 7 6 - 8 0 -4 73
001- 71 0 0 - 3 3 6 - 57 6 - 8 0 -4 74
PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS
001-7100-336 - 576 - 80-4 73
001-7100-336 - 576- 80-474
PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS
001-7100-333-576 - 8 0-4 73
001- 7100-333- 576 - 8 0-4 74
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001-7100-333- 576 - 8 0-4 73
001-7100- 333 - 576 -8 0-4 74
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 73
322.99
163519
12/12/2001 000096 LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
3033601
3088801
70.26
3200201
201.23
3238401
81. 30
2573402
53.76
2961401
29.93
1768602
539.96
269.98
1639103
207.92
217.02
3075401
122.58
224.46
3075201
143.25
355.11
2926402
95.55
41.34
88.66
9.62
2926602
2,419.94
-_u - - - _u - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - - --u- --
---- u__u---_u_----_u__u_--------_u_--_uu_--_u_--_u_-_u_--
Page,
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,00
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page,
Voucher
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = == = = == = === = = = = == = = = = = = === = = ==== = == = === = == = = === = = = = = == = == = === = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Amount
--_u__n_U _n__n--- u--nn_nn___--n-
163519
12/12/2001 (Continued)
163520
12/12/2001 000097 EDEN SYSTEMS INC
163521
12/12/2001 000101 PETTY CASH
--- - ------ - ___n_- --___u__n___n_____nn-
Invoice PO
nn n___nnn- nunnn_-
101103
99902
2957001
2049903
28830801
2798301
2926501
2781401
1014202
2592802
2781501
2906301
3042401
2961501
3050801
2890801
80406
2883701
11958 044124
12281 045663
Description/Account
_nn_____unnn__un_n___- -___--n_n_n-
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001- 7100- 333- 576 - 8 0- 4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001-7100- 333 -576- 8 0-4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001-7100- 336 - 576- 80-4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001- 7100-333 - 576 - 80 -4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0-4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001-7100-333- 576 - 8 0-4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001-7100- 333-576 - 8 0-4 73
001-7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 74
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001- 7100- 333 - 576 - 80-4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001- 71 00-333 - 576 - 8 0-4 73
001- 71 00-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 74
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001-7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001-7100- 333 - 576 - 80 -4 73
PKM-WATER SERVICE
001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0-4 73
PWS-WATER SERVICE
101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-4 73
PWS-WATER SERVICE
101-4400- 240 - 543 -10 -4 73
PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS
001- 7100- 336 - 576 - 80 -4 73
PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS
505-11 00-331' 571-1 0-4 73
PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS
505-1100- 331- 571-10-4 73
PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS
505-1100' 331- 571-10-473
14 .48
14.48
14 .48
4,706.85
364.13
373.18
5,509.74
77.94
145.61
65.35
46.22
14 .48
14 .48
341.13
361.04
152.89
13,825.00
19.78
335.40
98.55
31,990.07
Total,
MSDP-EDEN SYSTEM UPGRADE-INSTAL
502 '1100- 049- 518 -88 -643
1,237.50
Total,
1,237.50
PWT - BATTERY FOR SIGNAL COORDI
001-1100- 02 0- 513-10- 318
001- 5200- 073 - 558 - 60-433
4.59
4. 00
--- --- -- ------ ------- - - ------- - --- - --- -- - - --- - -- --- - ------ - - ------ - - ----
Page, 6
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,01
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page' 7
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
== = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = == = = ==== === = === === = == == = == = == == = = = = = = = = = == = = = = == = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = ====
Amount
Descript ion/Account
_u_-------- ---------- h-------------------------------- h---------- ------------ ----------------------_u_----- ---------------
163521
12/12/2001 (Continued)
12245
045662
163522
12/12/2001 000103 ICBO-WESTERN WASH CHAPTER
045571
12254
163523
12/12/2001 000105 ICBO-INTERNATL CONFERENCE 0 12255
045570
163524
12/12/2001 000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC
110241040
110301040
110301041
163525
12/12/2001 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12692
045492
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - ---- -- - - ---- - --- ----- -- - - ----- - - ---- ---.- - - - ---------
001- 52 00- 073 - 558 - 6 0-4 92
001- 5200 - 074 - 559- 6 0-31 0
101-4200 -210- 543 -1 0 - 318
101-4300 - 23 0- 543 -10 -312
101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -421
101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -433
101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -43 7
101-4300 - 23 0- 543 -10 -4 92
101-4300- 260- 543 - 30 - 318
119- 73 00- 961- 514 - 60 -437
CDHS - FLOURESCENT LABELS
001-1200- 084 - 557-20 - 310
001-1200- 084 - 557 - 20 - 318
001-5200- 073 - 558-6 0- 310
001-5200- 073 - 558 -6 0-431
001-5200- 073 - 558 - 6 0-4 92
001-5200 - 074 - 559- 6 0-431
001-7300 - 083 - 562 -10- 318
001-7300- 083 - 562-10-4] 7
101-4200- 210- 543 -10 -431
101- 42 0 0 - 21 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 3 3
101- 42 0 0 - 22 0 - 543 - 3 0 - 4 3 7
101-4300-230- 543 -10-431
101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -433
401-3100- 62 0- 542 -41-437
401-3100- 63 0- 542 -48 -319
12.00
8.25
24.96
3.47
6.45
6.00
20.70
6.82
11.69
19.67
3.43
12.97
28.27
18.41
27.81
16.34
46.09
3.11
15.28
2.18
21.05
45.21
52.88
10.00
33.57
Total,
465.20
CDB - ANNUAL WA CHAPTER ICBO DU
001- 5200- 074 - 55 9- 60-4 97
30.00
Total,
30.00
CDB - ANNUAL ICBO DUES/MK MARTI
001- 52 00.074 - 559- 6 0 -435
35.00
Total,
35.00
PS-AIRFARE,OAKLAND 11/01/01
001- 21 0 0 - 091- 521-10 -434
PS-AIRFARE, ONTARIO, CA FROM SEA
001-2100- 091- 521-1 0-434
PS-AIRFARE, BSHOCKLY 11/01/01
001- 21 0 0 - 091- 521-1 0 - 4 34
198.00
498.00
498.00
Total,
1,194.00
SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES
- - --- ------- - ------ - --- - - ---
Page, 7
p vchlst
12(12(200115,58,02
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 8
"= = = ="" = =" = = ="" = = ="" = = = = = = = = == = == =="" =" "=== == = == == = = ====" ==== == == = == = == ======== = === = = ==== = = "=== = = = = = = = = = = = === == === === ==
= == == === = = ===
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Description(Account
Amount
u_u-_n--- _un-_n- nnn_nnnh--u_ununnu_- __u_un_n h__n__uu _n_____u-_nn_n___nnnn- __---nn_nh-
12696
401- 31 0 0- 64 0 - 542 - 4 5 - 312
PS-FORD KEY -SECONDARY
001-2100-111- 521-22 - 312
PS-OPEN DOOR, ADJUST STRIKE
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 312
PKM-ARROW(KSP(BEST(FALCON I.C.
001-7100-332 - 576 - 8 0-48 0
PKRLS-CAM LOCK
505-1100- 351- 571-1 0-48 0
225.09
6.86
12691
98.77
12707
25.13
12714
146.30
Total,
502.15
163526
12(12/2001 000152 ELECTRO PRODUCTS/CABLE CO
97964
045539
MSTEL- INET PROJECT FIBER PATCH
502-1100- 04 9- 518- 88- 642
191.68
Total,
191.68
163527
12(12(2001 000201 KINKO'S INC
515100059728
PS-PRINTING SERVICES
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-4 92
68.04
Total:
68.04
163528
12/12(2001 000202 QWEST
630-1529-268
MC- FAX MACHINE CHARGES
502 -11 0 0- 04 6 - 512 - 5 0 -42 0
MSTEL- PHONE (DATA SVC
502-11 00- 046 - 512- 50-420
502-11 00- 046 - 521- 99-420
502-1100- 046 - 528- 8 0-420
20.97
T02-8674-231
88.85
322.06
699.65
Total,
1,131.53
163529
12(12(2001 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERC 1081
045567
CC- CHMBR LUNCH: JOANN PIQUETTE
001-1110- 010 - 511- 6 0-431
001-7200-352 - 571-1 0-431
85.00
20.00
Total:
105.00
163530
12(12(2001 000253 WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEP RE-13-ATB111 045509
PWCIP- INSPECTION
306-44 00-127- 595 - 64 - 520
249.72
Total:
249.72
163531
12/12(2001 000285 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT RENEW PERMIT
CDB-FIRE PERMIT FEES
001-11 00- 022 - 512 - 50 -490
80.00
Total:
80.00
163532
12(12(2001 000286 METROCALL
050606922-28
MSTEL- PAGER SERVICE
502-1100- 046 - 528- 8 0-420
12.53
u- - - - - - u - u - - -- - - - --- - - nn - - - n- -- __un - - n h_n- - n- _u_n- - - - --- n - _n - -- - n- - n - _n- nn - -- _n- - - - - --- u_- _n _nnn- -n__-h
Page: 8
p_vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,04
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 9
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Description/Account
=== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = ==== = = = = = = = = = == == = = = == = = === ======= == = = == = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == == == = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == ==== = = = = = == =
Amount
Invoice
PO
u_uu__u- _uu_u- _u_Uu__uuu_uuun_U__U_- UhUUUU uuuu__u
Total,
UU__U_----U---h U-_U-_hhu-
12.53
163533
12/12/2001 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO
CDB - TITLE REPORT/VILLA DEL MA
001-5200- 074 - 559-60 -410
446852
045578
Total,
163534
12/12/2001 000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE
PS-STORAGE RENTAL FEE/TRAFFIC
001- 21 0 0 -112 - 521- 7 0 - 4 52
DEC 2001
Total,
163535
12/12/2001 000385 ACCOUNTEMPS
MSA-TEMP-A.ADEKOYA WK END,11/02
001-1100- 041- 514 -10-412
MSA-TEMP,A.ADEKOYA WK ENDED,10-
001-1100- 041- 514 -1 0-412
06462962
06462977
Total,
163536
12/12/2001 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC
PKDBC-VA PGT SND 12/3/2001
402 - 7200-101- 575-45-410
PKDBC-FW ARTS COMMISION
402 -7200-101- 575-4 5-410
PKDBC- COUNCIL COMMT MEETING 11 /
402 - 7200 -101- 575-45-410
PKDBC-SPECIAL POPS 11/15/2001
402 - 7200-101- 575-45-410
PKDBC-WORLD VISION 10/29-10/31/
402 - 72 0 0 -1 01- 575 -4 5 - 41 0
PKDBC-VA PUGET SOUND 12/5-12/6/
402 - 7200-101- 575-45-41 0
PKDBC-FW FIRE DEPT 12/5/01
402 -7200 -101- 575-45-410
PKDBC-KEPLER COLLEGE 12/2-12/9/
402-7200-101- 575-4 5 -41 0
PKDBC-ST. MARK'S CATHEDRAL 12/1
402 -7200-101- 575-4 5 -410
PKDBC-CONSUMERS UNION 11/28-29/
402 - 72 00 -101- 575 -4 5 - 41 0
PKDBC-WA SENATE DEMOCRATIC CAUC
402-7200-101- 575 -4 5-410
PKDBC-EVERGREEN EYE CENTER 12/8/
402- 7200-101- 575 -4 5 -41 0
PKDBC- PGT SND WATER QUALITY ACT
402 - 7200 -101- 575-45-410
PKDBC-WORLD VISION 11/12-13/200
402 - 72 00 -101- 575-4 5-41 0
PKDBC-CONTEXT ASSC. 11/5-11/11/
5318
5360
5339
5338
5307
5321
5320
5317
5316
5359
5313
5324
5327
5314
5312
359.04
359.04
155.00
155.00
1,192.34
984.64
2,176.98
192 .40
168.90
136.00
136.00
634.50
367.80
248.78
3,644.10
169.20
1,098.40
219.30
977.44
170.00
309.40
_u_- - - p-- ------ u_--- - U_-- - -------- _u__u_- ------_u_u__u_-----_u__uu_--_u__u_---------------_u_u_---_u_---------_u-
Page, 9
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,05
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 10
. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = = ==== == = = === === = == = == = = == == == = == = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
Amount
-_u- u__u_u- __n_uu_uuuu_u_u_un__-U uu_uu_-- uuuuuu n_-UUUUUU_---_UUU_U-
-_uuuu_u-
5325
402 - 7200 -101- 575-45 -41 0
PKDBC-PRH INSTITUTE 11/7-14/200
402 - 7200-101- 575-4 5 -41 0
PKDBC-FW ART COMMS 12/6/2001
402 - 7200-101- 575-4 5-410
PKDBC-SOUTHWEST AIRLINE 12/15-1
402 - 7200-101- 575-4 5 -410
PKDBC-VA PGT SND 12/12,13,19,20
402- 72 00-101- 575-45-410
PKDBC- VA PGT SND MENTAL HEALTH
402-7200-101- 575-45-410
PKDBC-WEYERHAUSER TIMBERLAND ST
402- 7200-1 01- 575-45-410
PKDBC-SOCIAL SERVICE LOBBYISTS
402- 7200-101- 575-4 5 -410
283.00
163536
12/12/2001 (Continued)
5311
88.40
5362
114.80
5328
5326
95.22
357.60
228.80
5323
200.64
5322
509.20
Total,
10,349.88
163537
12/12/2001 000428 WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASSOC
12176
045586
PKPL/WRPA EXEC FORUM
001- 71 00-334 - 576 -1 0 -432
320.00
Total,
320.00
163538
12/12/2001 000438 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONE 1932
045564
CC-AGENDA SETTING LUNCH
001-1110- 010 - 511- 6 0-318
34.10
Total,
34.10
163539
12/12/2001 000458 VILLAGE BLACKSMITH INC
1907
045639
PKMT/BPA 3 FIX BOLLARD
303-7100-119- 594 - 76 - 650
43.52
Total,
43.52
163540
12/12/2001 000475 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS
199819
PKCHB-ALARM MONITORING SVCS
505 -11 00 - 331- 518 - 3 0 -41 0
PKCHB-ALARM MONITORING SVCS
505 -11 00 - 331- 518 - 3 0 -41 0
PKRLS-NOV 2001 ALARM
505 -11 00- 331- 571-1 0 -41 0
103.00
203990
103.00
199716
59.74
Total,
265.74
163541
12/12/2001 000555 CRISIS CLINIC
2150
045494
PS-VICTIM ASSIST TRNG
001-2100- 093 - 521- 21-435
342.92
Total,
342.92
163542
12/12/2001 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES
005-224-608
PKDBC-WATER SERVICE
402-7200-101- 575-45-4 73
273.58
U- - - - - _u u - u - -- - - u n - _uu - - u u u- ---- - uuu --
u- ----- -_u- un - u - u- _n - u - u_-
Page, 10
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,07
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 11
= = = = = = = == = = = = === = = = = = = = = == = == = == == = = = = === = = = = === = = = === = = = == = == = = ===== == == = = = = = === = = = = === = = = == = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = =
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
Amount
-----u----- ----_u_u --_uuuu_uu_uu_u_uu_uu uuu_uu- u---------- --_uuu_u__uuuuuu__u- u__uuu--_u
163542
12/12/2001 (Continued)
008-280-509
402 - 72 00-352 - 575-45-4 73
PKDBC-WATER SERVICE
402 - 72 00-101- 575 -45-4 73
402 - 7200- 352 - 575 -45 -4 73
PKKFT-FIRE SPRINKLER
402 - 7200- 3 52 - 575 -45-4 73
136.77
239.32
119.64
008-227-187
43.66
Total,
812.97
163543
12/12/2001 000667 RADIO SHACK
489906
045529
PWS - BATTERIES
101-4400- 240 - 542 - 30- 31 0
9.11
Total,
9.11
163544
12/12/2001 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY
1067209
1067215
PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
001- 7100- 332- 576 - 80- 319
PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
001- 7100- 332- 576 - 80- 319
263.01
57.61
Total,
320.62
163545
12/12/2001 000721 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC
0076264
PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK
101-4400- 240 -542 -30- 3 63
401-3100- 640 -542-45- 3 63
PWS-2-4" Q PU
401-3100-640 -542 -45- 363
PWS-PEA GRAVEL 004310
101-4400- 240 -542 -30-3 63
SWM-1 1/4 PU
401- 3100-64 0 - 542 -45-363
401- 3100-64 0- 542 -45- 3 64
179.52
54.40
0075910
188.50
0076289
76.16
0076555
167.2S
193.88
Total,
859.74
163546
12/12/2001 000723 SOUND RESOURCE MGMT GROUP I FWP-015
042002
PWSWR-SOLID WASTE/RECY COLLECTI
106 - 3200-250- 53 7 -1 0-410
1,028.02
Total,
1,028.02
163547
12/12/2001 000730 ENTRANCO INC
36233
043562
PWSCIP-23RD AVE S RD IMPROVEMEN
306 -44 0 0 -1 0 9 - 5 9 5 - 3 0 -411
PW-EXP REV,HOYT CENTER
101-4200 - 22 0 - 543 - 3 0 -411
29,572.28
34852
043851
Total,
137.15
29,709.43
163548
12/12/2001 000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO !NC 5331495
5333332
045583
PKM- RAINBIRD REGULATOR/VALVE
303 - 71 0 0 -1 08 - 5 94 - 77 - 6 5 0
PKM- IRRIGATION VALVE
437.47
045611
---- - - - - -- - - - --- - - - -_u - - - _u - - _u- - - --_u- - - --u - u---- u_u- uu_- _uu--- _Uu_-
- uuu - _u- -- uu- u- - uu -- _u- u_u-
Page, 11
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,10
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 12
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = === == = = = = == = = = = = = = = = ====== = == == = == ====== = === = === ==== = = = === = = == == == = == == = = = = = == =
=== == = = = = == == = === = == == ==
Amount
--_u_------ --_uu--- uuuuu_---_u_u--u_u__u_u _u_u---_u uu_uUu-
163548
12/12/2001 (Continued)
5339551
045638
163549 12/12/2001 000809 ECONOMICS PRESS INC 5123589 045587
163550 12/12/2001 000872 STAR LAKE GREENHOUSE INC 4948 045610
163551 12/12/2001 000874 MACHINERY COMPONENTS INC 88697
163552 12/12/2001 000920 PAPER DIRECT INC 45453 045453
332823810001
163553
12/12/2001 000954 DNB MAILING SERVICES
5852
5853
045538
045537
163554
12/12/2001 000955 MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANY
ABl11776S
045497
AB112051S
045520
163555
12/12/2001 001004 MAILMEDIA INC
36000
045602
163556
12/12/2001 001110 AMAYA ELECTRIC
6379-5
Description/Account
n_---U---_U_------- --u_n___u__-
164.05
303-7100-108 - 594 -77 - 650
PKM- IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001-7100- 332- 576 - 8 0 -315
Total,
CDA - FIRST RATE CUSTOMER SERVI
001- 5200 - 071- 558 -1 0- 311
Total,
PKM-DUSTY MILLER PLANTS
001- 7100-332- 576 - 8 0-313
Total,
MSFLT-RANSOME MOWER REPAIRS
504-1100- 043 -548 - 78 -48 0
Total,
PS-BLUE CERTIFICATES
001-2100- 092- 521-31-312
MSA-OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-1100 - 041- 514 -10-310
Total,
PWSWR-BULK MAILING SERVICE
106-3200- 259- 53 7-1 0-410
PWSWR-BULK MAILING SERVICE
106-3200 - 259- 537 -10-410
Total,
SWMM-SAND & GRAVEL
401- 3100- 64 0 - 542 -4 5 -363
SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES
401-3100- 64 0-542 -4 5 -319
Total,
PRCS-CLASS REG LTR
001-7200-352 - 573- 23 -421
Total,
ELECTRICAL SERVICES
001-7100 -333- 576- 8 0-48 0
-- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - u uu- - -_u _u - ---- - - - --u- _u- u u n-u _u_u - nnuu _u_- --_u - - - -_u- - - n_-- - - - u - - uuu
142.24
743.76
64.22
64.22
452.40
452.40
339.12
339.12
117.89
64.93
182.82
690.40
259.79
950.19
134.67
46.78
181.45
20.94
20.94
365.24
Page, 12
"".
p vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,12
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 13
= == = = == == = = = = = = = = = === = === = = === === = = = = = = = = ==== === = = ==== = == = = = = === = == === ====== = = = = = == = = = = == = = = == = = = = = = ==== = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = =
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Description/Account
Amount
------------ ----_u_-- --------------_u_---------------- ------------ ---
----------u------------------- ---------------
163556
12/12/2001 (Continued)
001- 7100-336 - 576 - 80-480
401- 31 00 - 64 0 - 54 2 - 4 5 -4 8 0
505 -11 00 - 331- 518 - 3 0 -4 8 0
426.12
405.80
791.36
Total,
1,988.52
163557
12/12/2001 001166 PETTY CASH
012214
045546
PRCS-FOOD-YOUTH COMM
001- 72 0 0 - 3 51- 574 - 21- 312
001- 72 0 0 - 3 51- 574 - 21- 318
001-7200-351- 574 - 22 - 318
001- 72 0 0 - 3 52 - 571-1 0 - 312
001-1200 - 352 - 571-10-421
001- 1200 -352 - 573-21- 312
001- 1200 -352 - 573 -21-33 0
001- 1200 - 352 - 573 -23 -312
18.00
23.20
43.71
19.22
2.87
21.97
27.14
7.61
Total,
163.12
163558
12/12/2001 001174 PNBOA-PACIFIC NW BASKETBALL 11382
043663
PKRLS-BASKETBALL OFFICIALS
001-7200- 351- 573 - 63 -411
7,447.50
Total,
7,447.50
504917939001
MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC
502 -1100- 046 -512 - 50 -423
502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 521- 99 - 423
502-1100- 046 - 528 -8 0-423
MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC
502 -11 0 0 - 046 - 512 - 5 0 -4 23
502 -11 0 0 - 046 - 521- 99-423
502-1100- 046 - 528 - 80 -423
MSTEL- LONG DISTANCE SVC
502-1100 - 046 - 512 - 50-423
502-1100- 046 -521- 99 -423
502 -1100- 046 - 528 -8 0-423
MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC
502 -1100- 04 6-512 - 50-423
502 -11 00 - 04 6 - 521- 9 9 -4 2 3
502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 52 8 - 8 0 -4 23
MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC
502-1100 - 046 - 512 - 50 -423
502-1100 - 046 - 521- 99 -423
502-1100 - 046 - 528 - 80-423
MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC
502-1100 - 046 - 512 - 50 -423
502 -1100 - 046 - 521- 99 -423
502-1100 - 046 - 528 - 80-423
MSTEL- LONG DISTANCE SVC
502 -1100 - 046 - 512 - 50 -423
1. 53
14.08
14.99
163559
12/12/2001 001233 A T & T BUSINESS SERVICE
510691538001
510645149001
2.41
22.13
23.57
504916115001
1. 21
11.18
11.91
51014612001
2.16
19.93
21.23
1. 58
14.54
15.48
510660202001
1. 53
14.08
14.99
584948549001
1. 53
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_u_---- ---------
--_u---------------
Page' 13
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,13
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 14
= = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = == = == = = = == == === == = = == == = = = ==== = = = === == = = == = = == = = === = = = = == = === = = = = === = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = ===
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
Amount
uuu_u_-- _u_u-_u u_u_uuuuuu_uu_u_uuu- u---_uuu u_uu_-u- ---------------_uu--_u_u_-- uu_--uuu_-
163559
12/12/2001 (Continued)
510678441001
502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-423
502 -1100- 046- 528 - 8 0-423
MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC
502 -11 0 0 - 046 - 512 - 50-423
502-1100- 04 6 - 521- 99 -423
502-1100- 04 6 -528 - 8 0-423
MSTEL- LONG DISTANCE SVC
502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 512 - 5 0 -4 2 3
502 -11 00- 04 6 -521- 99-423
502 -11 00- 04 6 - 52 8 - 8 0 -423
14.08
14.99
0 .76
7.04
7.50
510661494001
0.92
8.50
9.06
Total,
272.91
163560
12/12/2001 001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRA 035060
035061
043610
PKDBC-LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS
402 - 72 00 -101-575-4 5-48 0
PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SVCS
001- 710 0 - 333 - 576 - 8 0 -48 0
1,711.95
043823
2,215.98
Total,
3,927.93
163561
12/12/2001 001358 DOUBLETREE INN AT PASCO
85339163
045114
PS-LODGING FEE, WASPC CONF
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-432
1,623.60
Total,
1,623.60
163562
12/12/2001 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC
24477
PWS - RECYCLED AS PHALT
101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-362
PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-362
PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-362
PWS-RECYCLED BROKEN ASPHALT
101-4400-240- 542 - 3 0-362
PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
101-4400 - 24 0 - 542 - 3 0 - 3 62
401- 310 0 - 64 0 - 542 - 4 5 - 3 62
PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
101-4400 - 24 0 - 542 - 3 0 - 3 62
SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT
401-3100- 640- 542 -45-362
76.92
24476
574.25
24316
576.15
24315 .
50.16
24282.
25106
1,389.54
1,082.99
67.62
25445
94.82
Total,
3,912.45
163563
12/12/2001 001436 TREE RECYCLERS
11024CE
045522
SWMCIP-TREE REMOVAL
304 - 31 0 0-111- 5 96 -42 -41 0
PKM-REMOVE 2 ALDERS ALONG REDON
001- 7100-335- 576 - 8 0-48 0
PKM-REMOVE ALDER/LAKE GROVE PAR
001- 7100-335- 576 - 8 0-48 0
261.12
11116
045505
587.52
11023AS
045319
390.96
u---- - - ---_u_u - -_u_----_u_--
- --- -- - ------ - ------- - ----- - - - ---- - -- - - -- ---- - - - - - - - --- - ---- - --- - - --- -- - --- ------
Page, 14
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15:58:15
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 15
0 ~ 000000000000000000 00 ~ ~ ~oo = = = = = = = = = = == = === = = = = =~~ = = 0= 0== 0 0 = oo~=o=o = = =~= == =~ == == = 0 = = == == 0 = = == === 0 0 = = = = = == = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = == = = = = ~ = =~ = =
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
Amount
--_u_--_u- __U__h_- _hhUUU_UUU_U_------------ h_U_h___- -_uu_----- ---_u_------------------
U-hhUUhu
Total:
1,239.60
163564
12/12/2001 001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC
3299392
042383
SWM-KITTS WETLANDS MONITORING
304 -3100- 500- 596 -42 -41 0
2,155.82
Total:
2,155.82
163565
12/12/2001 001592 UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY
2001 PLEDGES 045666
UWKC FAIR SHARE OF CITY OF FEDE
001- 0000 - 083 -367-10 - 000
845.25
Total:
845.25
163566
12/12/2001 001601 TAK INC
5614
045593
MSHR-2ND PG LETTERHEAD
001-11 0 0- 04 5- 518 -4 0-4 92
88.86
Total:
88.86
163568
12/12/2001 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
218182-01
PS-BOOTS
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0
PS-CR FOR BOOTS INV 218182-01
001-2100- 094- 521-11-33 0
PS-SWAT TEAM CUST EMB
001- 21 00 - 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0
PS-MISC FOOTWEAR & ASSOC.
001- 2100- 094- 521-11-33 0
PS-SEW ON YRS OF SVC
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0
PS-FASTENERS & WORDING
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY, WMNS
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0
PS-REMOVE CLOTH INSIGNIA
001- 210 0 - 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0
PS-SHOE BLK PLN TOE OXFORD
001- 210 0 - 0 94 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-RMV/SEW YRS OF SVCS
001- 21 00- 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0
PS-GLVS,DR SKIN PATROL
001- 21 0 0 - 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0
PS-SHOE BLK PLN TOE CHUKKA
001- 21 00- 0 94 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-HELMET COVER, KELAR 1 S2
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0
PS- PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY
001- 21 00 - 0 94 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-BOOT 8 "BLK PLN TOE
141.39
218182 CR
-41. 29
212985
408.00
218438
-41. 29
218393
11.42
213241-01
20.67
215904
234.90
216396
234.90
216044
8.16
216045
100.00
215462
6.53
216598
28.23
218876
100.10
214668
169.29
217379
234.90
218877
- --- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - U- - U - _u- - - U - - - - - - U - u__uu uu- U U U - - -_u - _u_u
Page: 15
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,17
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page' 16
Voucher
Vendor
Invoice
PO
"""" ~"~ ~"~ ~ = = ===" = "=== = =,= == ==" =" ""="""" === = = ===== == = = ==== == == == === ="== =""=""=== ===""" = """" ""~"=""""""""""" = =""" == = = = = = =" ~ = = = = = = = ="
==
Amount
Date
Descri pt ion/ Accoun t
_--n__nu- n__-_-_-- -_---_nn_nn_nn_nnnn_nn nnnn_n- _nnnnn- ___n----n__--h-__-__-
163568
12/12/2001 (Continued)
215460
213241
214714
216600
216307
163569
12/12/2001 001715 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN
95908
163570
12/12/2001 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION 34003
043281
163571
12/12/2001 001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE
4004
043984
4003
043984
163572
12/12/2001 002093 RALEIGH, SCHWARZ & POWELL I 90701
045635
163573
12/12/2001 002137 INLAND FOUNDRY COMPANY INC
27651
045526
163574
12/12/2001 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONCRETE 12786
045493
163575
12/12/2001 002379 PACIFIC TOPSOILS INC
31556
--- - - - --- -- ----- - ___n____n_- - n_nn____n-u-_n_n_- ____n_n______--______n__- ------ ------ ------ - ----_____--n_-
Page, 16
__nnn-
---nn--h--n
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0
PS-REMV/SEW EMBLEMS ON GARMENT
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0
PS- PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-FLSHLGHT HLDR
001- 21 0 0 - 094 - 521-11- 33 0
PS-SHOE LO-TOP
001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 330
100.10
13,06
352,35
352,35
47.76
97,87
2,579.40
Total,
PKCP- PESTICIDE SVCS
001-7100-336 - 576 - 8 0-480
663.68
Total,
663.68
PWS-STREET SWEEPING SVCS
401-3100- 64 0- 542 -45 -48 0
2,961-20
Total,
2,961-20
PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS
001-7100-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 8 0
PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS
505-1100-331- 518 - 3 0 -48 0
1,980,11
837.69
Total,
2,817,80
MSRM-ADD 99 CHEV/INSURANCE
501-1100- 043 - 514 - 76 -46 0
501-1100- 043 - 514 - 76 -4 65
501-1100- 043 - 521- 99 -4 6 0
1,069,00
219.00
8,930,05
Total,
10,218.05
PWSWM-HVY 3-BOLT DRAIN
304 -3100-111- 596 -42 -319
292.95
Total,
292.95
SWMM-CONCRETE MIX
401-3100- 64 0- 542 -45-364
183.87
Total,
183.87
SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,18
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 17
~~~ = = = = == = = = = = = == == == = = = = = = == = = = == = = = = == = = = = = === == == ==== = ==== ====== == = = ===== ======= == == = = = = = === = == = = = = = = = = = = = = ===
= = === = = = = == == = = = = = =
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Description/Account
Amount
U_h__un- --h_-UU hhh_hhh_h_hh_hh_h__h- U_UUUh-
-- hh_hhhh_hh-_hhh___h _hh___h__h-
30940
304 - 31 0 0 -111- 5 96 -42 -4 76
SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES
304 - 31 0 0 -111- 5 96 -4 2 - 4 76
SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES
304 -3100-111-596 -42 -4 76
SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES
304 -3100-111-596 -42 -4 76
SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES
304 - 3100-111- 596 -42 -4 76
127.75
110.00
30945
110.00
30866
75.00
30859
75.00
Total,
497.75
163576
12/12/2001 002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO
107985
045636
PKM-CATCH BASINS W/GRATES
001- 7100- 332 - 576 - 8 0-361
201.81
Total,
201.81
163577
12/12/2001 002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC
01F6210
045531
PWSWM-GLUE SEWER TEE
401- 3100- 64 0- 542 -45 -319
49.14
Total,
49.14
163578
12/12/2001 002534 ARBORS CAN INC
1761
045561
PKM/HAZARD TREE
001- 71 0 0 - 33 5 - 57 6 - 8 0 -4 8 0
979.20
Total,
979.20
163579
12/12/2001 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL
1-306724
PKRLS- PEST CONTROL SVCS
505 -11 00 - 331- 5 71-1 0 -4 8 0
51.14
Total,
51.14
163580
12/12/2001 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT 12329
045654
PKM- PESTICIDE LICENSE/M BLACKSH
001-7100-310-573 -10- 318
001- 7100-331- 576 -10- 312
001- 7100-331- 576 -10-43 5
001- 7100- 331- 576 -10-4 3 7
13.06
9.01
25.00
93.84
Total,
140.91
163581
12/12/2001 002664 FLEX-PLAN SERVI':ES INC
35931
MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVCS
001-1100- 04 5 - 516 -20 -41 0
MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVCS
001-1100- 045- 516 -20-410
307.50
36487
283.50
Total,
591.00
163582
12/12/2001 002899 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC
0.2001012.0
039650
CDPL-ENV REV,HW PHASE II MONITO
001- 5200- 073 -558 - 6 0-411
1,661.44
_Uh---U---U--
- - - - - U - - - U - - - ----- - - _h h ___h- - hh- - -_U h - ___h - - - _h- __un - - -- --- - - - - - - - - - - -- - h U - h - - - - - - ----- - - - U-
Page, 17
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,19
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 18
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
= = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = == = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = == ==== = = = = === = = = === = = == ===== = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === =
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = == = = = = = == = = = =
Amount
PO
Descript ion/Account
163582
12/12/2001 (Continued)
0.2001012.0
--_--H_U-- --uu---- u_uuuuuuuu_u----_uu_u ----_u_uu _--_HUUU uuu_u_--uu_uu_uuuu- --_uuuuuu
25.19
0.2001012.0
045614
0.2001012.00 039645
044917
163583
12/12/2001 002924 ST PAUL, THE
GP06300439
163584
12/12/2001 002962 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
5440004
163585
12/12/2001 002966 RECYCLED PLASTIC MARKETING
10030
163586
12/12/2001 002985 ESRI INC
90475245
163587
12/12/2001 003001 SOUTH KING HUMAN SVCS COUNC SKCHS-AM-49
163588
12/12/2001 003035 GUIDANCE SERVICES INC
S29707
S 29515
S 29424
S 29806
S 30016
S 30280
S 30147
_u- - - - - - _H --u - - H - u - - --u u - u_u - u--- - u- - u- _uuu- -- - _u - _uu-
045554
045569
045281
045566
045549
CDPL-WETLAND BIOLOGIST SVC
001-5200- 073 - 558 - 6 0-410
CDPL- ENV REV, DEVONSHIRE PRE - PLA
001- 52 00- 073 - 558 - 6 0-411
CDPL- ENV REV, MERIDIAN CT MONITO
001-5200 - 073 - 558 - 6 0 -411
Total,
MSRM-DEDUCTIBLE/JORDAN CLM
501-1100- 043 - 521- 99 -4 95
Total,
PS-EVIDENCE LAB SUPPLIES
001-2100- 093 - 521- 91-312
Total,
PWSWR-COMPOST BIN DISTRIBUTION
106 - 3200-250- 53 7-10 -410
Total,
MSGIS-ARCPRESS LICENSE FOR ARCG
502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 532 - 2 0 - 3 56
Total,
CD/HS-MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
001- 7300- 083 -562 -10-497
Total,
MSA-TEMP-WSCONWETTER 10/8-10-19
001-1100- 041- 514 -10 -412
MSA-TEMP,W.SHONWETTER 10/1-5
001-1100- 041- 514 -10 -412
MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 9/24-28
001-11 00 - 041- 514 -1 0 - 412
MSA-TEMP, W. SCHONWETTER 10/22-26
001-1100- 041- 514 -10-412
MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 10/29-11
001-1100- 041-514 -10-412
MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 11/13-16
001-1100- 041- 514 -10-412
MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 11/05-09
001-1100- 041- 514 -10 -412
- - u----u - u- u _u u - - u - - _u--u ------
1,268.25
1,025.81
3,980.69
10,000.00
10,000.00
91.26
91.26
35,496.67
35,496.67
1,520.51
1,520.51
50.00
50.00
821.70
430.65
485.10
311.S5
480.15
559.35
455.40
Page, 18
P vchlst
12/12/200115,58,21
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 19
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
00000000000000000 = 0 0 0 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 = = = = =0 0 0 0 0 0 = = = = = == = = = = = = 0 0 0 0 = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 = =0 0 0 = = = = = = = = =
= = = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 00= = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 =
Amount
Descript ion/ Account
uuuuuuun-_nHHUUUUU uuu_-_u- u_u_u_--- _uuu_uu___n---_uuu_- nnu___uuu
uuu-_u
163589
12/12/2001 003085 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROU 806965
045401
163590
12/12/2001 003129 AMS LASER SUPPLY
318099
CM254971
319419
163591
12/12/2001 003130 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER IPS-TRAINING
045540
PS-TRAINING
045600
163592
12/12/2001 003270 SEBRIS BUSTO PS
30983 039686
076923 044867
173674-0
173674-1
175775-1
175775-0
WO295730 045544
163593
12/12/2001 003275 INTOXIMETERS INC
163594
12/12/2001 003325 CHUCKALS INC
163595
12/12/2001 003352 MOTOROLA INC
MSDP Ips MEMORY
502 -1100- 046 - 518 -88 -3 57
502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-3 57
MSDP- PRINTER TONER
502-1100- 046- 518 - 88 -316
MSDP- PRINTER TONER
502-1100 - 046- 518-88 - 316
MSDP-PRINTER TONER
502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 518 - 88 - 316
PS - FBINAA TRAINING
001- 21 0 0 - 0 91- 521-10 - 4 3 5
PS - FBINAA TRNG LUNCHEON
001-21 00- 091- 521-10 -435
LAW-LEGAL SERVICES
001-1100- 051- 515-20-410
PS-PBT ALCO-SENSOR III
001-2100 -112 - 521- 7 0 - 3 54
MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-11 00- 022 - 512 -50-310
MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 50 - 31 0
MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 - 31 0
MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES
001-1100- 022- 512 - 50- 310
MSDP/PS VRM REPAIR
502-1100- 046 - 521- 99-319
Total,
3,544.20
114.00
71 7.23
Total,
831.23
118.48
-133.79
276.30
Total,
260.99
25.00
25.00
Total,
50.00
771.50
Total,
771.50
768.59
Total,
768.59
27.99
72.67
15.91
86.42
Total,
202.99
386.24
--- - - ---- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - _u -- ----u - - - -----_u _u_--- uuu u--- u ---- - u u_--- uu - - -_u - u ---- - - - - u- -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - u - - - - - u - --
Page, 19
...
P vchlst
12/12/200115,58'22
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 20
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = === ===== = = = === == = == === === === == ===== == == == = = = = = == == = == = = = = == === = = = == ==== = = = = = = = ==
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ===
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descri pt ion/ Accoun t
Amount
_uu__uu- h_h-h_- hh_h_U_--_____hhhh_h_hh h_Uhh_h hhhhhh hU_hhUUhh_hUUU__h- ----h_U_hh-
Total,
386.24
163596
12/12/2001 003386 PEREZ, RICK
TRVL REIMB
TRAVEL REIMB, MARCH 25-28
101-4300-230- 543 -10-431
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-432
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-434
101-4300-230- 543 -10-43 6
101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-439
145.00
775.84
173.50
25.50
40.23
Total,
1,160.07
163597
12/12/2001 003426 SCHENKEL, KEITH
PS-REIMBURSE 045547
PS-REIMB,RENTAL CAR EXP
001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 22 - 4 3 6
217.40
Total,
217.40
163598
12/12/2001 003444 WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS
NOV 2001
PS-UNIFORM CLEANING
001-2100 - 094 - 521-11-415
649.07
Total,
649.07
163599
12/12/2001 003593 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LAB INC 0264601-IN
045582
PS-EVIDENCE TAPE
001-2100 - 093- 521- 21- 312
001-2100 -111- 521-22 - 312
185.39
111.60
Total,
296.99
163600
12/12/2001 003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE 1850-1862
043199
PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT SVCS
402- 7200-101- 575-4 5-415
402 -72 00 -3 52 - 57 5 -4 5 - 415
4,073.85
3,230.00
Total,
7,303.85
163601
12/12/2001 003697 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
3001451-01
045548
SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES
401-3100-640- 542 -4 5-33 0
175.88
Total,
175.88
163602
12/12/2001 003730 LE MONS, ROBERT C
01-1416
045543
PS- INTERPRETER SERVICE
001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 2 2 - 41 0
180.00
Total,
180.00
163603
12/12/2001 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
F65S8V461
PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
001-2100- 093 - 521- 91-421
PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
001-2100- 093 - 521- 91-421
12.96
F6588V441
34.78
- - - h - - - - U - - U - - -- - h - - - - - hh - - h - - - hU - - - - - hhhh h- h___- hU- h h U h _h_h ___Uh h - - - - - - - - h_- - --
Page, 20
.~
P vchlst
12/12/200115,58,24
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 21
Voucher
= = = = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === == = = ========= = === = = = == == == = = ==== = = == == = ===== = ====== = === === == == = = = = = = == = = = == = = = =
== == = = = = = = = = = === = ====
Amount
Date
Vendor
Description/Account
Invoice
PO
_uun___n u--nnn _---nnun
163604
163605
163606
163607
163608
163609
163610
163611
_nn_U_un nnnnnn nnnUn_- nnnnnnnuu_-__--nuu- nn_nnUnu
Total,
47.74
12/12/2001 003841 TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WA INC 3336-5
044769
PKM-SANITATION SERVICES
001- 71 00-333 - 576 - 8 0-453
382.50
Total,
382.50
12/12/2001 004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT D 10140112
10140113
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
001-2100- 093 - 521-23 - 354
PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT
001-2100- 093 - 521- 23 - 354
52.84
244.56
Total,
297.40
12/12/2001 004093 QWEST INTERPRISE
D08-6046-046
MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES
502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-420
502 -1100- 046 - 528 - 8 0-420
MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES
502-1100- 04 6 - 521- 99-420
502-1100- 046 - 528 - 8 0-42 0
64.74
397.71
64.74
397.71
008-6046-046
Total,
924.90
12/12/2001 004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERNATION 4348
045474
PKDBC/KFT-ENVELOPES
402 - 72 0 0-1 01- 575 -4 5 - 31 0
402-7200-352 - 575 -4 5- 310
80.09
80.07
Total,
160.16
12/12/2001 004209 WLEEA (WA LAW ENFORCEMENT)
045621
PS-EXPLORER ACADEMY
001- 2100-112 - 521- 71-435
1,470.00
PS-EXPLORER
Total,
1,470.00
12/12/2001 004218 TIMCO INC
045504
PWS-MISC. SUPPLIES
101-4400-240- 542 - 6 6 -354
3.95
71008
Total,
3.95
12/12/2001 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR
003440
MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTISEMENTS
001-1200- 044 - 514 -3 0-443
MSC-LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS
001-1200- 044 - 514 -3 0 -44 0
290.85
63.25
003382
Total,
354.10
12/12/2001 004302 FEDERAL WAY NEWS
045568
CM-FED WAY NEWS SUBSCRIPTION
001-1100- 02 0 -557-2 0 -311
24.00
FW-C M
- n n n n - - - u - n - - - - u - - - u - - - - u u - - - n n n u - - - - u
--- - - - - - ----- nn___n____n_- ___n__n_u______un nnn_n_n
Page' 21
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,26
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 22
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
= == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = ==== = = = ==== = === ==== = = === = = == = = = = = = == = = ==== = = ==== === = === = = = === = == = = =====
== = = = = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = =
Amount
PO
Descript ion/Account
--_u_------ uu_----- nnnnu-nnnnnnuUn_nn nnnnnn nnnHuu u_nnnnnnnU_hhuh-n n_-_U__hu_-
163612
12/12/2001 004356 SUMPTER, KYLE
PS-REIMBRS
163613
12/12/2001 004360 NATIONAL CONCRETE CUTTING I 19107
163614
12/12/2001 004364 CENTRE AT NORPOINT
4550
163615
12/12/2001 004397 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC
12- 2
163616
12/12/2001 004409 INGHAM, BARB
PRCS -REIMB
163617
12/12/2001 004412 CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS SALE 165-01
186 - 01
163618
12/12/2001 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 00002517
00002523
0002516
00002518
00002522
00002519
00002514
045601
045498
044209
045542
041738
044133
043374
039674
043358
040883
044258
Total,
PS-REIMB,WSTOA TRAINING
001- 2100 - 094-521-24 -435
Total,
SWMM-CUTTING SERVICE
304 -3100-111- 596 -42 -319
Total,
PKRLS-WATER AEROBICS CLASSES
001- 7200-351-574 - 21- 519
Total,
PW-EXP REV, ST FRANCIS HOSP AMBU
101-4200-220- 543 -3 0-411
Total,
PRCS-PRESCHOOL FROG
001- 72 00- 3 52 - 574 - 2 3 - 3 54
Total,
PS-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
504 -1100- 043- 521- 99-48 0
PS-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS
504 -1100- 043 - 521- 99-48 0
Total,
CDPL-MISC CODE AMENDMENTS
001- 5200- 073 - 558 -60-411
CDPL-EXP REV,U-HAUL FACILITY
001- 5200- 073-558 - 6 0-411
CDPL-PLN REV, PAVILION CENTRE II
001- 5200 - 073-558 - 6 0-411
CDPL- PLN REV, KELLER SUBDIVISION
001- 52 00- 073- 558 - 6 0-411
CDPL- PLN REV, QUADRANT ECCP PARC
001- 5200- 073 -558 - 60-411
CDPL-PLN EXP REV , NEW HIGH SCHOO
001- 5200- 073- 558 - 6 0-411
CDPL-EXP REV,GLENWOOD PLACE APT
001- 52 00- 073 - 558 -60-411
24.00
140.00
140.00
391.68
391.68
84.00
84.00
1,180.62
1,180.62
119.67
119.67
1,460.06
2,235.64
3,695.70
1,587.57
742.50
260.40
274.56
5.28
2,526.30
265.58
- - - - - - un - n- - n - - U - - - _un - nn - - - - nn- nn- n- nn - _Ph n n_n - __n - n_h- nn - - n- nn - - - nnn- un hn n- nh ___n-
Page, 22
P vchlst
12/12/200115,58,27
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 23
Voucher
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = == = = == == = = = == = = = = == = = = = = = == = = == = == = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = ==
Amount
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
163618
_UU_h---- hh___-U --hUhhUU __UhhUh_hUh __--_hhh- h
041975
163619
163620
163621
163622
163623
163624
163625
163626
12/12/2001 (Continued)
00002513
045592
045467
043756
045470
12/12/2001 004716 PACIFIC TRANSFER LLC
MVGATVN11150 045545
Description/Account
- hU__hhh__hhhhhh_hh --hhh_hhh
517.44
CDPL-PLAN EXP REV, FOSS
001- 52 00- 073 - 558- 60-411
PS-TECH SUPPORT: EQUIFAX
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-410
Total:
6,179.63
12/12/2001 004550 SOFTECH INC
99051
60.00
Total:
60.00
12/12/2001 004601 COMMERCIAL SOUND/COMMUNI CAT 026040
12/12/2001 004637 SWINGWERK GOLF INSTRUCTION
AG98-192c
PKKFT-SERVICE CALL: THEATRE SOliN
402- 72 0 0-352 - 575-4 5 -480
PKRCS - GOLF LESSONS
001-72 00 -351- 573 - 62 -411
001-72 00 - 351- 573 - 63 -411
MSGAC-DMX MUSIC SVC
502 -1100- 046 - 519- 91-414
PS-LUNCH: OFFICER PATROL
001- 21 0 0-111- 521- 2 2 - 318
PS-LUNCH: OFFICER PATROL
001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 2 2 - 318
MSTEL- CELLULAR AIRTIME
502 -11 0 0- 04 6 - 521- 9 9 -4 24
502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 52 8 - 8 0 -424
247.52
Total:
247.52
12/12/2001 004669 AT&T BROADBAND
016-0367712
879.75
879.75
Total:
1,759.50
12/12/2001 004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION SERVI 111501DECFWT
1205FWPD NOV
12/12/2001 004701 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
0002682579-4
130.00
Total:
130.00
12/12/2001 004704 FARR, CHERYL J
12067
213.05
132.65
Total:
345.70
945.95
532.10
Total:
1,478.05
LAW-COURT TRANSCRIPTION FW V. K
001-1500- 052- 515-10 -41 0
PS-MOVING EXPENSE: KWONG
001-2100- 094 - 521-11-41 0
- ---- - - -.. - - - - - - - - _hU - - h Uh h- UU - _uu ----_u- ___Uh _h_U h Uh_h__--_- ---- - -----
52.50
Total:
52.50
1,599.98
Total:
1,599.98
_U_--- --,,------Uh___-U_h
Page: 23
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,28
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 24
Voucher
00 = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = 0 == = = = === == === = === === = ==== = == === = ==== = = ==== = === == = = = = = === = = 0 = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == = = = == ==
Amount
Date
Vendor
Invoice
---- ------------ ------------ -------------------_------hh- -------h------
70.00
163627
------------ ---------- --------_--------h
12/12/2001 004748 KING COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION 12252
163628
163629
163630
163631
163632
163633
12/12/2001 004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE
100577
12/12/2001 004849 SAMS SANITARY & MAINTENANCE 58336
58235
59079
12/12/2001 004910 FILETEX LLC
01-552
01-536/528
12/12/2001 004977 BLIMPIE SUBS & SALADS
8054
12/12/2001 005008 LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES
PS-TRAINING
PO
045573
045598
045589
045588
045562
045575
12/12/2001 005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST IN 22306820-001 045612
21538664-001
21593654-001
21793576-001
21555274-001
22242032-001
--- -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - ---- -- --- -- - - --- -- - - --- - --
22095686-001
------- - - - ---- ----- ----- --- - --- - - ----- - - --- - - - - ---- - --
Page, 24
Description/Account
CDB - CONFERENCE REGISTRATION/C
001- 5200- 074 - 55 9 - 6 0-435
Total,
70.00
MSDP/PW POWER INVERTER
101-4200-220- 543 -3 0-352
1,015.35
1,015.35
Total,
PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES
402- 7200 -1 01- 575-45-314
PKM-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
001- 7100-332 - 576 - 8 0- 314
PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
505-1100- 331- 518 - 30 - 314
615.48
129.08
129.08
Total,
873.64
CDA - LASER PRINT COLORCODED LAB
001- 5200- 071-558 -10-31 0
CDA - LASER PRINT COLOR CODED LA
001- 5200- 071- 558 -10- 31 0
67.11
104.45
Total,
171.56
CC- REFRESH. FOR CC MTG
001-1110- 01 0 - 511- 60-318
56.80
Total,
56.80
PS- POLICE LIABILITY SEMINAR
001-2100- 0 91- 521-10-4 3 5
269.00
Total,
269.00
PKM-RENTAL OF MINI EXCAVATOR
303 - 7100-1 08 - 594 -76- 6 5 0
PWS- PROPANE FOR POWER
101-44 00-24 0- 542-3 0- 3 62
PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
101-4400 -24 0- 542 -3 0-3 51
SWM-CONCRETE SAW RENTAL
304 - 31 0 0-111- 5 9 6 -4 2 - 4 53
PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
101- 44 0 0- 24 0 - 54 2 - 3 0 -4 53
SWM-EQ RENTAL, CONCRETE SAW
401- 31 00 - 64 0 - 542 -4 5 - 4 53
PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
218.40
29.92
10.55
60.06
245.36
142.01
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,30
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 25
Voucher
== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = ==== = == = = == == = = === = = = = = == = = = === = = = == == ===== = = = = = == == = = === = == = == = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = ==
Amount
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
163633
----- ---------- _u----u-----u-----u----u----- ----u_----- ------------ --_H-_------------------------ ---------------
10.07
163634
163635
163636
163637
163638
163639
163640
163641
163642
12/12/2001 (Continued)
12/12/2001 005025 PCCI
12010-B
043193
045519
045630
045550
045496
045468
045576
045533
- ----- ----- - - ---- --- ------------ -_u_- ---------------------_u-----------------
12/12/2001 005043 MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT 30WO0202369
t0970001
12/12/2001 005059 TIRE DISPOSAL & RECYCLING I 59224
12/12/2001 005076 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC 0029271-IN
12/12/2001 005131 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION INC
9008
12/12/2001 005160 MOSELEY, DAVID
12249
12/12/2001 005195 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
394465
12/12/2001 005231 ros CAPITAL INC
53204713
12/12/2001 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS &
06417
401-3100- 64 0- 542 -4 5- 319
PKCHB-JANITORIAL SVCS
505-1100- 331- 518 - 3 0 -415
SWMCIP-MISC. REPAIR
304 -31 00-111- 596 -42 - 319
PKM-TRENCHER RENTAL
303 - 7100-108 - 5 94 - 77 - 650
PWSWR-TIRE DISPOSAL
106 -32 00-259-53 7-10-410
PS-SRT QUALIFICA TARGETS
001-2100- 094 - 521-24 -312
Total,
716.37
1,796.00
Total,
1,796.00
202.46
244.80
Total,
447.26
439.50
Total,
439.50
70.45
Total,
70.45
PKKFT-TEST /SERVICE, FIRE SPRINKL
402 -72 00 -352- 575-4 5 -410
CM-MILEAGE REIMB, MOSELEY
001-1100- 020 - 513 -10-433
001-1100- 020 - 513 -10-43 7
PWS-CONF.JOHN MULKEY
101-4400-240 - 542 - 3 0 -435
MSM&D- COPIER RENTAL
503-1100- 043 - 512 - 50-453
503 -11 00 - 043 - 518 - 7 0 -4 53
PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT SVC
565.76
Total,
565.76
23.00
175.61
Total,
198.61
Total,
1,890.00
1,890.00
Total,
840.44
1,814.43
2,654.87
------------------------_u
Page, 25
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,32
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 26
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = === = = = == === == = == = === == = === = = = == = == = ======= = = == = = = == = ==== = == = === = == = = = = = = = == =
== = = = = = == = = = = = ==== = = = ===
Amount
n~U--U~-- U~UU_-- _nu----_--uu~uuuuu~uuu _u
uuuuu~-
D6416
D6416~2
163643 12/12/2001 005306 VICTORIA A INC 000445 045552
163644 12/12/2001 005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 8222873
163645 12/12/2001 005345 PUGET POSTINGS 1479
163646 12/12/2001 005382 ARTCO SIGN COMPANY INC 4226
163647 12/12/2001 005392 WAYNE INVESTIGATIONS 0015 040553
163648 12/12/2001 005406 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL SEPT-NOV '01
163649 12/12/2001 005439 FREEBORN, SUE PRO TEM
163650 12/12/2001 005470 MIRAI ASSOCIATES #1 AG01~118 045187
Description/Account
~~~u~~~~uuuuu~~~ -_u__uu_u_-
131.00
505-1100-331- 576- 80-41 0
SWM-NOVEMBER 2001
101-4400 - 24 0 - 542 - 3 0 - 42 0
401-3100- 64 0 - 542 -45-42 0
SWM-OCTOBER 2001
101-4400 - 24 0 - 54 2 - 3 0 -42 0
401- 31 0 0 - 64 0 - 54 2 - 4 5 - 4 2 0
PS-REPAIR LEATHER JACKET
001-2100-112 - 521- 70 -33 0
PS- FUEL FOR VEHICLES
504 -11 00 - 04 3 - 521- 9 9 - 32 0
MC-JURY SOURCE LIST 2001
001-11 0 0- 02 2 - 512 - 5 0 - 312
PKRCS-STONEWORK ON MONUMENT
402 - 72 0 0 -1 0 1- 575 -4 5 - 630
402-7200- 3 52 - 575-45- 63 0
CDB- LEGAL PROCESS SERVER
001- 5200- 074 - 559 - 60-411
PKRCS-MARTIAL ART CLASSES
001- 72 00 - 3 52 - 5 74 - 2 3 - 41 0
MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{DATE}
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-410
70.37
70.38
153.62
153.63
Total,
579.00
163.20
Total,
163.20
23.39
Total,
23.39
216.00
Total,
216.00
Total,
2,393.60
2,393.60
4,787.20
300.00
Total,
300.00
2,537.20
Total,
2,537.20
112.50
Total,
112.50
PWT-TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE (TIF) ST
101-4300-239 - 543 -10-411
1,707.20
n- -~ ~- - - - - u~ - - - - ~_u - - - u- - - - - n- - - - - ~-~- ~ ~--u uuu u_u- - - u- u__u - - - _uu - - - - - _u - - u~- - - - - u - ~ - n ~ ~- -- -- - - ~- ~ ~ ~--- uu uu_-
Page' 26
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15: 58: 34
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 27
Voucher
""""""""" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~"~~~" ~"~== == ==== == == = == == ="=~ ==== ===== == = = = == = == = = = = = = =" = =
= = = == = = = = ="====
Amount
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Description/Account
--_u------- ---------- ---------------u_------u_------- ------------ ------------ _uu-------------------------- ---------------
163651
163652
163653
163654
163655
163656
163657
163658
12/12/2001 005536 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC
1001350053
045517
12/12/2001 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DIVIS 200754
SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES
401- 310 0- 63 0 - 54 2 -4 8 - 3 54
PS-SUPPLIES: FLEET
001- 21 0 0-111- 521- 22 - 312
MSTEL-SYS MAINT
502 -1100- 046- 512 - 50-4 8 0
502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-4 8 0
502 -1100- 046 - 528 - 8 0-48 0
MSTEL-SYS MAINT
502 -1100- 046 - 512 - 50-48 0
502 -1100- 046 -521- 99-48 0
502 -1100- 046 - 528 - 80-480
PS-REIMB:BOOT ALLOWANCE
001- 2100-111- 521-22- 33 0
Total:
1,707.20
127. 04
Total:
127.04
57.75
Total:
57.75
12/12/2001 005587 AVAYA INC
12/12/2001 005599 VAUSE, GREG
12/12/2001 005602 SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES
12/12/2001 005609 BUCK, PEGGY
045574
2712040900
2711571834
PS-REIMB 045551
10957 042319
PKM-REIMB 045644
12/12/2001 005648 UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY 2001 DONATIO 045667
12/12/2001 005671 GLACIER NORTHWEST INC
36908
045495
79.48
834.50
1,072.93
79.48
834.50
1,072.93
Total:
3,973.82
100.00
Total:
100.00
PKC-CELEBRATION PK MITIGATION M
001-7100-333 - 576 - 80-48 0
2,974.47
Total:
2,974.47
PKM- PK & REC COMMISSION FOOD IT
001- 71 0 0- 31 0 - 573 -10- 318
80.34
Total:
80.34
UWPC FAIR SHARE OF CITY OF FEDE
001- 0000- 083-367-10- 000
SWMM-TOOLS
401-3100- 640- 542 -45-351
845.25
Total:
845.25
18.33
Total:
18.33
-- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - --- - - - - - ---- - - u -- - - - ---- - - ---- ------ -- - ---- - - ----- - - ---- - - - - u-- - -- --- ---- - - - - - -- -- u - - - - - -- ------
------- - --
Page: 27
p vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,36
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page' 28
Voucher
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ = == = = ~ ~~ ~ ~ = == = ~ = = = = = ~ ~ = = = = == = = = = ~ == = = = = ======== = = == ===== = ==== = = == == = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = =
Amount
Date
Vendor
163659
-___uu_h- u_-_u_u ------_u_-_uuuu
12/12/2001 005697 WORK-SPORTS & OUTDOORS
163660
163661
163662
163663
163664
163665
163666
163667
12/12/2001 005704 CASCADE ELEVATOR COMPANY
12/12/2001 005736 HANSON, SETH
12/12/2001 005798 CERTIFIED LAND SERVICES
12/12/2001 005842 DPK INC
12/12/2001 005893 J & K PLUMBING INC
12/12/2001 005920 URS CORPORATION
12/12/2001 005922 QWEST DEX
Invoice
PO
0310
045585
333
043887
328
043030
273
043030
PS-REIMB
045541
103
043609
AGOl-63 #6 043967
102901-4 045472
03869 044421
661-3748-00
12/12/2001 005949 S 0 TECH/SPECIAL OPERATÍONS 624
-_u - - - - - - --- - - ---- - - - -- u - u_u- - _u- uu- ---- _u-
045581
Descript ion/Account
PKM-RAIN GEAR/S OSBORN
001-7100-331- 576 -10-33 0
u uuu_u_uuu_u_u--u_u_- --uU_---u_u
86.70
Total,
PKCHB-ELEVATOR SERVICES
505-1100- 331- 518-3 0 -48 0
PKRCS-ELEVATOR MAINT SVC
505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 571-10 -48 0
PKRCS-ELEVATOR MAINT SVC
505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 571-10 -4 8 0
Total,
PS-REIMB, PER DIEM EXPENSE
001-2100-111- 521- 22 - 431
Total,
PWSCIP-REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION
306 -44 00-126 - 595 - 3 0-411
Total,
PWS-23RD AVE SO ROADWAY IMPROVE
306 -44 00-109- 595-30- 650
Total,
PKDBC-REPAIR KITCHEN SINK
402 - 72 00 -101- 575-45 -480
Total,
SWM-ESA/NPDES GAP ANALYSIS
001- 52 00- 079- 558 - 6 0-411
401-3100- 649- 542-48-410
Total,
PKDBC- DIRECTORY AD
402 - 7200-1 01- 575-4 5 -44 0
Total,
PS-BELT HANGER ADAPTER
001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 2 2 - 312
- uu ---_u- - - - - u- - -- uu - - _u_--- ----
86.70
141.44
141.44
141.44
424.32
136.00
136.00
3,825.41
3,825.41
363,086.57
363,086.57
195.97
195.97
632.83
12,389.39
13,022.22
107.40
107.40
87.50
Page, 28
P vchlst
12:/12/2001 15:58:38
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 29
Voucher
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = === == === = === = = === ==== = === ==== = = = ==== == = == == == ===== = = ====== ===== == = == = = = = = = = = ===== = = = = = == == ==
== == = = = = = == == = == =
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Descript ion/Account
Amount
PO
u_-_uu_-- _uu--u- uuu_--_uuu_--_u_u_-_uu_- u-_u__uu ___un_un u_--_u_--uuu__uu-------- -_u_u_u_uu
163668
163669
163670
163671
163672
163673
163674
163675
163676
Total:
87.50
12/12/2001 006015 TEAM CONCEPTS
2487
045499
PS - DENIM OXFORD SHIRTS
001- 2100- 093 - 521-21- 33 0
304.64
Total:
304.64
12/12/2001 006028 FREEBORN LAW OFFICES PS
110601FREE
MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{DATE} 11062001
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 5 0 -41 0
225.00
Total:
225.00
12/12/2001 006055 COMMERCIAL FENCE CORPORATIO 2000231
045535
SWMM-INSTALL FENCE
304 -3100-111- 596-42 - 319
3,568.64
3,568.64
Total:
12/12/2001 006056 CUFLEY, CHRISTY GERHART
PRO TEM
MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{DATE}
001-11 00- 022 - 512- 50-41 0
109.38
Total:
109.38
12/12/2001 700688 BUSCH, PATRICIA
REF #90702
PKDBC-REFUND CLASS CXLD
001- 0000- 000-213-10- 001
60.00
Total:
60.00
12/12/2001 702061 WINTERS, DARRELL
12204
045584
PKDBC/BONSAI GARDEN
001-7200- 352 - 573-23 - 312
38.06
Total:
38.06
12/12/2001 703054 RUTEL, MARK
01-210-259
MSRM-CLAIM 01-01-210-259
501-1100- 043 - 514 - 91-4 95
3,136.31
Total:
3,136.31
12/12/2001 703055 NORA, BOWMAN
10/19/2001
101801BOWMAN
PKDBC-REFUND H2O COLOR CLASS CX
402- 0000- 000-213 -1 0- 001
PKDBC-REFUND WATERCOLOR CLASS C
402- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001
51.00
51.00
Total:
102.00
12/12/2001 703056 CHENEY, BERTHA
101201CHENEY
PKDBC-REFUND CLASS CANCELLED
402- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001
35.00
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - ---- - -- _u --_u_u -_u_-- - - -_u --_u- u- - - u_- u_-- u - --- - - --- - u_-- u uuu - ----_u- u-
Page: 29
P vchlst
12/12/200115'58'39
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 30
Voucher
""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = =
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = ~ = = ~ = ~ ~ = = = ~ =
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Description/Account
Amount
PO
n_--nnn-
-- n_--n-
Uun__n_- nn
n_n__nn- n_u--_n n___u_n
163677
163678
163679
163680
163681
163682
163683
163684
163685
163686
Total,
35.00
12/12/2001 703057 HALL, SHIRLEY
101201HALL
PKDBC- REFUND SWIM PROGRAM
402 - 0000- 00 0-213 -10 - 001
25.00
Total,
25.00
12/12/2001 703058 BIZAK, KATHY
101901BIZAK
PKDBC-REFUND CANCELLED RECEPTIO
402- 0000- 000 -213 -1 0- 001
455.00
Total,
455.00
12/12/2001 703059 NEHF, JOHN
01-41729
MSF-REFUND APPLICATION PAYMENT
001- 0000- 090-369- 90- 010
20.00
Total,
20.00
12/12/2001 703060 SEK, KIM
03-0036652
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL
001- 0000- 090-367-10- 073
50.00
Total,
50.00
12/12/2001 703061 ST. VINCENT DE PAUL, JOSEPH 101201CORNER
PW-REFUND ADMN DEPOSIT
101- 0000- 000-23 9-10- 002
3,883.00
Total,
3,883.00
12/12/2001 703062 KHAN,MAIMUNA
03-0036591
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL
001- 0000- 090 -367-10- 073
50.00
Total,
50.00
12/12/2001 703063 HATHAWAY, PRUDENCE
03-0035884
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL
001- 0000- 090 - 367 -1 0- 073
50.00
Total,
50.00
12/12/2001 703064 PEEKAY INC." DBA LOVER'S P 01-0041168
MSF-REFUND LICENSE FEE
001- 0000- 000-321- 70- 000
50.00
Total,
50.00
12/12/2001 703065 GORHAM, PAM
01-0041444
MSF-REFUND LICENSE FEE
001- 0000- 000-321- 70- 000
50.00
Total,
50.00
12/12/2001 703066 ENDSLEY, PAUL
03-0036586
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL
u_- - nun - n - - - _n- - - n n --- nn - - _n-
- - - -- - - - u -- - -- - - --- - - -- - n n_- - n- - _~___n _n - __n nun n____n
Page, 30
p vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58 :40
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 31
Voucher
== = == = = == = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = ===== = = = === ==== == = = === = = = == === = == === = = == === = = === = = = = == = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = === = =
= == == = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Date
Vendor
Invoice
De scri pt ion/ Accoun t
Amount
PO
----_u----- _u_--uu u--u----------uuu_u--------- u----_u--- --_uu----- -----_u-----u---------------- ---------------
163687
163688
163689
163690
163691
163692
163693
163694
163695
001- 0000- 090-367-10- 073
50.00
12/12/2001 703067 THE GOOD GUYS
REFUND
Total, 50.00
PWS-REFUND ROW PERMIT
101- 0000- 000- 23 9 -10- 002 2,929.00
Total, 2,929.00
CDB-REFUND MECH CK FEE
001- 0000- 074 - 345-83 - 001 62.87
Total, 62.87
CDB-REFUND ELEC FIXTURES
001- 0000- 074- 322-10- 007 49.25
Total, 49.25
PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DPST
402 - 0000- 00 0-213 -10- 001 99.00
Total, 99.00
PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DPST
402 - 0000- 0 00-213 -10- 001 150.00
PKDBC- REFUND RENTAL DPST
402 - 0000- 00 0-213-10- 001 135.48
Total, 285.48
CDB-REFUND ADMIN DEPOSIT
001- 0000- 00 0 -239-10- 000 500.00
Total, 500.00
PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DPST
402 - 0000- 00 0-213 -10- 001 127.32
Total, 127.32
PKDBC- REFUND RENTAL DPST
402 - 0000 - 00 0 -213 -1 0 - 001 125.00
Total, 125.00
PKRCS-REFUND
001- 0000- 000 -213 -1 0- 001 15.00
PKRCS-REFUND TRIP FEE
12/12/2001 703068 UNITED SYSTEMS, INC.
1031UNITEDSY
12/12/2001 703069 INTERCEPT CONTROL SYSTEM, I 0110310700
12/12/2001 703070 WOODMONT ELEM SCHOOL, BUSHA 110901WOODMR
12/12/2001 703071 STOLTENBERG, BRUCE
102701STOLTE
102701BRUCE
12/12/2001 703072 QUADRANT CORP, ATTN, JEFF R REF. DEPOSIT
12/12/2001 703073 SEA INST. FOR BIOMEDICAL, C 101701HYDE
12/12/2001 703074 SALTWATER UNITARIAN CHURCH, 110401SALTWA
12/12/2001 703076 BERGLUND, COLLEEN
REF 90701
REF#90419
----------
------- - -- --- -- - - - ---- - - u- - -- - - - - --- - -- ----- - - -- --
--- - - -- ---- -- - --- -- - -- - - - - --- - - ---- --- ---u-- - ----
Page, 31
P vchlst
12/12/200115,58,41
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 32
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Descript ion/Account
=== = = == = = == = = == = = ==== = = = = === == == == = = = = ==== = == === = = = == ======= = == == == = = = = = === = === = = == = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ===
Amount
PO
---_u_--_u _u_----U u_--u--_uu_---u--_u_---_u-- U
001- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001
u_--u__u- _u_uu_u_-_uu_u_-_u_---- uu_uuuuu
16.00
163695
12/12/2001 (Continued)
163696
12/12/2001 703077 SHELTON, STEVE
REF#90416
PKRCS-CLASS CANCELED
001- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001
163697
12/12/2001 703078 SMITH, DOUG
REF#90417
PKRCS-REFUD FOR OVERPAYMENT
001- 0000- 000- 213 -10- 001
163698
12/12/2001 703079 TEAL, AZHMALIYYIH
REF#90418
PKRCS-REFUND CLASS REG.
001- 0000- 000-213-10- 001
163699
12/12/2001 703080 IDEAL SERVICES, ATTN, JUDY
REF01-104417
CDPL-REFUND 01-104417-00
001-0000- 074 - 322-10- 007
163700
12/12/2001 703081 BROWN, MARGARET ANN
4901648
MC-JUROR FEE, 11/19-21
001-11 00- 022- 512 - 50-4 91
163701
12/12/2001 703082 DE LOS ANGELES, EDWIN
4903287
MC-JUROR FEE, 11/19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91
163702
12/12/2001 703083 ELLERS ON, JERRY
4903837
MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21
001-1100 - 022 - 512 -50-4 91
163703
12/12/2001 703084 FISH, JAMES D
4904203
MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512-50-4 91
163704
12/12/2001 703085 GROW, LOUISSA PEARL
4905112
MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21
001-11 00- 022- 512 - 50-4 91
-- - - - u - - - - u --- - - --- - - - -- - - - - - - --- - u _u -- -- - - u -_u- u_u- - - u_- u u_u - --_u - - - -_u- - -_u u -- -- u - ---- uu
Total:
31.00
5.00
Total:
5.00
25.00
Total:
25.00
33.00
Total,
33.00
52.80
Total,
52.80
25.52
Total:
25.52
24.14
Total:
24.14
33.80
Total:
33.80
24.14
Total,
24.14
16.90
Total:
16.90
Page: 32
P vchlst
12(12(2001 15,58,42
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 33
Voucher
== = = = = = === = = = = = == = = = = = == === = = = = = = = === === ====== === == = = = == = == = = === == = === == = = = = == === = = = = = = = = ==== = = = = = = = = = == = = = =
= = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == =
Amount
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Descript ion (Account
163705
------------ ---------- ---------------------------------- u---------- ------------ ------------------------------- ---------------
26.90
163706
163707
163708
163709
163710
163711
163712
163713
163714
PO
12(12(2001 703086 HARDWICKE, ANN GILMARTIN
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
4905440
12(12(2001 703087 LOCKWOOD, MARSHA J
4908223
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512-50 -4 91
12(12(2001 703088 MANSELL, GENA HELENE
4908579
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
12(12(2001 703089 MURPHY, PATTY B
4909791
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91
12(12(2001 703090 REMPEL, ELDEAN B
4911924
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512- 50-4 91
12(12(2001 703091 SAMEK, RICHARD A
4912659
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91
12(12(2001 703092 SMITH, BRENT P
4913620
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
12(12(2001 703093 WILLIAMS, NATHANAEL
4916383
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91
12(12(2001 703094 ZICKLER, DAWN
4917040
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-1100- 022- 512 - 50-491
12(12(2001 703095 STROBEL, MILBERT
5900
MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21
001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91
Total,
26.90
22.76
Total,
22.76
26.90
Total,
26.90
22.76
Total,
22.76
26.90
Total,
26.90
31. 04
Total,
31.04
26.90
Total,
26.90
25.52
Total,
25.52
28.28
Total,
28.28
16.90
-- - - - -- -- - - - --- - - - ---- - ---- --- --- -- --- ---
---------------------
Page, 33
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 34
P vchlst
12/12/200115:58:42
Voucher
~~ = = ~ = = =~ = = = = = = = ~ = = = == = =~==== = = === = == = = == = =~ = ~~~ ~ == == == = = == ~=~~ = = == = ======~= = = = = = = = = ==~~~ = == = == = = = ==== =~~ ==~ = == ~ =
= ~==== = = = == = = = = ====
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Description/Account
Amount
PO
u---------- ---------- ----------------------------------
--- ------ ------ - -- ---- -- - ----- - - -- -- - ---- -----
163715
163716
163717
163718
163719
163720
163721
163722
163723
163724
12/12/2001 703096 VAN STRALEN, JUDY
Total: 16.90
MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-491 12.07
Total: 12.07
PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL
001- 0000- 090- 36 7 -1 0- 073 50.00
Total: 50.00
PW-REFUND OVERPYMT FROM INV#323
101- 0000- 000-322 -4 0- 000 184.00
Total: 184.00
MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512- 50-491 50.70
Total: 50.70
MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25
001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 34.14
Total: 34.14
MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-491 22.76
Total: 22.76
MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 25.52
Total: 25.52
MC-JUROR FEE: 910/22-25
001-1100 - 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91 25.52
Total: 25.52
MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25
001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 36.21
Total: 36.21
MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25
5901
12/12/2001 703097 BERG, RAMONA
REF TRAFFIC
12/12/2001 703098 PUGET SOUND ENERGY, ACCOUNT REF INV3233
12/12/2001 703099 ALBERS, SUZANNE F
4900186
12/12/2001 703100 BAKER, LINDA
4900674
12/12/2001 703101 BAKER, PATRICIA C
4900677
12/12/2001 703102 BLAHA, KATHRYN M
4901186
12/12/2001 703103 BLAU, WILLIAM F
4901220
12/12/2001 703104 BLUBAUGH, MARK
4901241
12/12/2001 703105 DAWSON, LINDA C
4903191
- - -------- - ---- -- ---- -- ---- -- - - ----- -------- ------ ----
- --- - - - --- - -- - -- - --- - -- - - - -- - - ------ - - ---- --- ---- ------- ------
Page: 34
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,42
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 35
== = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == = = = = == = = = == = = = = = = === = === = == = = ==== ==== = = == === = = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = = ==
== == = = = == = = === = ==== = ===== ===
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
Amount
u_u__u_u _uu-_U- un___-UU_UU_-_UUUUU-_U uu__u_u- _u_uu_--- uunUUUUU-_UUU-
_UUUUU_U-
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
22.76
Total,
22.76
163725 12/12/2001 703106 DURFLINGER, JEAN C 4903680 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-11 00- 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 24.14
Total, 24.14
163726 12/12/2001 703107 FIERKE, MARY I 4904152 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022- 512 - 50-4 91 24.14
Total, 24.14
163727 12/12/2001 703108 HARDT, CLARENCE NEAL 4905438 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100 - 022- 512 - 50-4 91 24.14
Total, 24.14
163728 12/12/2001 703109 KIM, SANG DO 4907256 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 34.14
Total, 34.14
163729 12/12/2001 703110 LEWIS, CATHLEEN C 4908073 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 22.76
Total, 22.76
163730 12/12/2001 703111 MARSHALL, GEORGE PAUL 4908641 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022- 512 -50-4 91 25.52
Total, 25.52
163731 12/12/2001 703112 PETTIS, GARRY WARREN 4911208 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91 24.14
Total, 24.14
163732 12/12/2001 703113 PIGGOTT, REED MADSEN 4911324 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-11 00- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91 12.76
Total, 12.76
163733 12/12/2001 703114 POORE, RICHARD C 4911423 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022- 512 - 50-491 26.90
Total, 26.90
- -- U - - - - - - - -_U - u_u - - - - u-- - - - U- -- - uu - _u - - __un - -_u U - - - - u_u - - - U- - u_u - - - _u- - - -_u - - - - - - - - - - - U - U - - - - - - - n_- - - - - U
- U
Page, 35
P vchlst
12/12/200115,58,43
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 36
Voucher
== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = === = = = = === = = = == = === ==== = = ===== = == = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ==
Amount
Date
Vendor
Invoice
Descript ion/Account
163734
--uu---u- nU--UU uu_uu_n-__UUUUU_UU---- --_uu--_u --_u_--_u- uuu_u--_uuu_uun--u_- uUu__uuu-
38.28
163735
163736
163737
163738
163739
163740
163741
163742
163743
12/12/2001 703115 QUINE-TAYLOR, JANIS L
12/12/2001 703116 SAGE, LEE
12/12/2001 703117 SHUCK, LEANNE NORENE
12/12/2001 703118 SrLLAS, MATTHEW JOHN
12/12/2001 703119 SPROUL, RANDALL LEE
12/12/2001 703120 TAVARES, VICKI L
12/12/2001 703121 URABECK, DIXIE A
12/12/2001 703122 VAUGHAN, RAYMOND C
12/12/2001 703123 VINE, ESTHER G
12/12/2001 703124 WILSON, ROBERT A
PO
4911651
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100 - 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
Total,
--- u - - - - - - u - _u - - -- - - - - u - -- - - u u - - - - _u - - uu- - - _uu -- h- -- u__u u__u- - u _u - - - - - h-U - - - -- _u- u__u u uu - - u- --
4912613
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-11 0 0 - 02 2 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91
4913361
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
4913401
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91
4914022
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
4914673
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 5 0-4 91
4915336
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
4915502
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100 - 022- 512 - 50 -4 91
4915594
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
4916479
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-11 00- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
38.28
24.14
24.14
24.14
24.14
24.14
24.14
24.14
24.14
24.14
24.14
22.76
22.76
21. 38
21. 38
24.14
24.14
24.14
Page, 36
P vchlst
12/12/2001 15,58,43
Print Voucher List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 37
000000000000000 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 0 =0 = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = == = = === = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = ===
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO
Descript ion/Account
Amount
--_un--U- n__-U_U uuuu_uU
u--uuu- --
_uuu_---- u_un__uu__n_nuu_uuu uu--uu-----
Total,
24.14
163744
12/12/2001 703125 WOO, BRENDA KERN
4916609
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91
24.14
Total,
24.14
163745
12/12/2001 703126 ZITZER, JUNE G
4917064
MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25
001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91
36.21
Total,
36.21
163746
12/12/2001 703127 REILLY, KIM
10192001REIL
PKDBC-REFUND WATERCOLOR CLASS C
402 - 0000- 00 0 -213 -10 - 0 01
34.50
Total,
34.50
Total Vouchers, 768,647.77
244 Vouchers in this report
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and
that the claims are just and due obligations against the
City of Federal Way, Washington, and that I am authorized to
authenticate and certify to said claims.
Signature
Date
--- - - - - -- - - -- n- - - _u - - u_u - - - - - --- - _u u_u- - ---_u - - nUU u -- - u nU-
- u _nu- - -_u- - nU - u_-_u uu- --
Page, 37
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10,08,33
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 1
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
-------- -------- _u_--_u--------------------------- ---------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------
163309 11/20/01 001004 MAILMEDIA INC J#36000 11/14/01 On-Line Reg. Letter Po 1,481.29 1,481.29
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163310 11/30/01 000002 SOUND VIEW AUTO BODY INC 1996 11/02/01 MSFLT-VEH BODY/PAINT 883.34 883.34
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163311 11/30/01 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY 031750 10/16/01 MSFLT-FIRE EXTINGUISHE 179.03 179.03
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163312 11/30/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 131823 10/18/01 PKDBC-REPAIR/MAINT SUP 11.94
Voucher, Bank Code, key 131643 10/17/01 PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES -12.02
131394 10/10/01 PKDBC-TARPS 11.95
132717 11/13/01 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT BUrp 23.67
131831 10/22/01 PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE 5.29
131711 10/18/01 PKDBC-BONSAI/MAINT SUP 2.52
131628 10/17/01 PKDBC-BONSAI/MAINT SUP 7.42 50.77
163313 11/30/01 000044 OGDEN, MURPHY, WALLACE, PLL 609104 07/31/01 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES 25.00 25.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163314 11/30/01 000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP 541215 10/17/01 LAW-PSE ADV. CITIES 2,525.15
Voucher, Bank Code, key 534160 07/23/01 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES (A/E 1,625.00
53416 OA 07/23/01 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES (SIG 24,085.48 28,235.63
163315 11/30/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 0.00
HVOIDH Voucher, Bank Code, key
163316 11/30/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 753-129-10 10/22/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101.98
Voucher, Bank Code, key 252-150-20 10/25/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 96.68
183-469-10 10/17/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 136.64
472-100-10 10/17/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 69.87
699-699-10 10/18/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 5.47
311-112-70 10/22/01 PKDBC/KFT-NATL GAS 1,156.28
727-469-10 10/22/01 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY 1,810.59
117-437-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 105.38
373-087-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 136.60
917-259-10 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 74.44
458-148-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 276.75
141-467-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 222.33
504-368-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 46.22
657-289-00 11/01/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 6.09
720-429-10 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 122.03
755-430-20 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 94.03
250-275-03 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 189.19
733-829-10 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 47.49
131-066-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 10,660.33
342-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 93.97
352-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 25.80
-- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---
Page, 1
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10,08,33
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 2
= = = = ~ = ~ = ~ ~ = = = = ~ ~ = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = ~ ~ = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
_n_n --__un n_-------_--___n----nn----__--_- -______n- nn_n_nnn--___--- _--n_nn____- nnn__--_nn_n
163316 11/30/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC (continued)
442-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 25.80
536-673-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 232.20
738-448-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 58.64
638-448-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 78.19
128-255-39 10/18/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 419.92
904-388-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 124.81
996-289-00 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 111.63
062-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 13.57
736-169-10 10/30/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 138.70
190-977-00 10/29/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 153.97
153-835-10 11/06/01 PS-STREET LIGHTING 13.52
544-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 88.39
534-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 324.61
744-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 132.39
934-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 98.55
654-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 404.35
644-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 128.28
444-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 1,174.96
168-847-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 190.44
454-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 18.77
398-842-10 11/07/01 PKRLS-ELECTRICITY/GAS 1,190.59
895-405-10 10/18/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 132.51
519-842-10 11/07/01 PKCHB-ELECTRICITY CHGS 2,726.41
439-922-10 11/07/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 2,777.63
980-132-10 11/14/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 1,722.51
918-041-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 438.46
345-200-20 11/07/01 PKCP-ELECTRICITY CHGS 3,042.97
002-141-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 42.11
109-922-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 849.43
102-141-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.47
722-288-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 168.68
711-141-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.47
319-041-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 83.18
993-440-20 10/25/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 176.70 32,771 . 97
163317 11/30/01 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE 34113370/1 10/16/01 CDB-OFFICE SUPPLIES 953.16 953.16
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163318 11/30/01 000065 U S POSTMASTER POBOX RENE 11/29/01 MSMD-ANNUAL FEE, PO BOX 750.00 750.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163319 11/30/01 000075 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES I 017-204057 11/02/01 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 1,203.21 1,203.21
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163320 11/30/01 000097 EDEN SYSTEMS INC MSF-TRAINI 11/14/01 MSF-YR END TRAINING-ED 500.00 500.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n - - - n n - - - - - - - - - n - - - - n - - - - - - - - - - n - - - - - - - - - n - n - - - - - - - --
Page, 2
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10,08,33
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 3
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
Date
163321 11/30/01 000109
Voucher,
163322 11/30/01 000125
Voucher,
163323 11/30/01 000142
Voucher'
163324 11/30/01 000166
Voucher'
163325 11/30/01 000173
Voucher,
163326 11/30/01 000201
Voucher,
163327 11/30/01 000202
Voucher,
163328 11/30/01 000217
Voucher,
163329 11/30/01 000228
Voucher,
163330 11/30/01 000253
Voucher'
163331 11/30/01 000328
Voucher,
163332 11/30/01 000340
Voucher'
163333 11/30/01 000343
Voucher,
Invoice
_nnnn_n nnnnn
ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12709
Bank Code, key 12703
12702
KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISIO 1079211
Bank Code, key 1083945
CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE
Bank Code, key
TRA CK# 1828
CK# 1829
CK# 1827
CK#1831
CK# 1830
CK# 1812
CK #1809
CK# 1823
INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION 183892
Bank Code, key
Inv. Date Description
Amount Paid
_n_n____n__nnn_- n_n_n_n__n
11/08/01 PWS-PADLOCK
11/06/01 PKDBC-LOCKSMITH SERVIC
11/05/01 PKRLS-LOCKSMITH SERVIC
10/16/01 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MA
10/19/01 PS-KING CO JAIL{SEPT}
11/21/01
11/21/01
11/16/01
11/29/01
11/29/01
11/08/01
11/02/01
11/07/01
PWS-TRAVEL TWESSEL 11/
PWS-TRAVEL J . MULKEY 11
PS-TRAVEL,D.GABRELUK 1
PS-J.LINDSAY,LV PRACTI
MSF-J . TEELER MEALS
PS-J. LANDON TRAVEL EXP
MSF-S. GORDON, MEALS/LO
PS-A. KIRKPATRICK MEALS
10/24/01 PWT-MEMBERSHIP DUES
WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 3101345667 12/01/00 LAW-2001 COURT RULES
Bank Code, key
KINKO'S INC
Bank Code, key
5151000593 10/08/01 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS
QWEST
Bank Code, key
Z04-0609-4 11/04/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC
630-152926 10/29/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 5- 984- 5515 10/12/01 MSFLT-POSTAGE/TRANSPOR
Bank Code, key
MULTI-SERVICE CENTER
Bank Code, key
AG 01-47
10/17/01 CDBG-CARES CHILD CARE S
WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEP RE313ATB11 10/09/01 PWS-WSDOT MAINTENANCE
Bank Code, key RE313ATB11 11/09/01 PWCIP-GENERAL PROJ MGM
ATB1110918 11/09/01 PWCIP-GEN PROJECT MGMT
ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA)
Bank Code, key
0088201
0090403
0088202
0089300
10/15/01 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE
11/15/01 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE
10/15/01 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
10/31/01 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES
WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVIC 2001100214 10/22/01 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE
Bank Code, key
ELEPHANT CAR WASH
Bank Code, key
9/30 STMT
-- --- - ------ --- -------- - ------ ----- - ------ - ----- --- _n-
09/30/01 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE
31.78
170.47
27.42
229.67
31,143.87
79,937.32
111,081.19
120.00
120.00
122.00
190.00
53.65
777.72
137.13
791.12
2,311.62
273.00
273.00
254 .14
254.14
595.41
595.41
11,334.33
20.97
11,355.30
35.10
35.10
10,248.51
10,248.51
14,141.51
968.41
152.12
15,262.04
1,876.68
1,327.21
3,782.18
3,795.94
10,782.01
1,032.51
1,032.51
154.98
154.98
Page, 3
0 chklst
11/30/200110,08'33
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 4
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
Date
nnn_nn
163334 11/30/01 000351
Voucher'
163335 11/30/01 000376
Voucher'
163336 11/30/01 000414
HVOIDH Vouchee
163337 11/30/01 000414
Voucher,
163338 11/30/01 000432
Voucher,
163339 11/30/01 000438
Voucher,
--- - nn nn- - _nn - --
Invoice
nn_nnn_n _n_nnn
SEATTLE TIMES-SUBSCRIPTIONS 30446434
Bank Code, key
Inv. Date Description
11/06/01 CM-SEATTLE P-I SUBSCRI
KING COUNTY WATER & LAND DI SWM 2001-2 10/22/01 SWM-UTLY BLNGS/COLLECT
Bank Code, key
CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC
Bank Code, key
CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC
Bank Code, key
TAYLOR RENTAL
Bank Code, key
5288
5250
5249
5248
5246
5245
5244
5241
5239
5238
5237
5228
5272
5254
5270
5273
5271
5275
5287
5280
5281
5295
5247
5242
5240
5274
5269
5285
5252
5243
5279
5296
5306
5299
030275
DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONE 1914
Bank Code, key
10/31/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
10/15/01
10/25/01
10/23/01
10/25/01
10/25/01
10/25/01
10/25/01
10/31/01
10/25/01
10/25/01
10/31/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
10/25/01
10/25/01
10/29/01
11/01/01
11/01/01
10/25/01
11/05/01
10/31/01
11/08/01
PKDBC-CATERING SVCS
PKDBC-CATERING,11/19-2
PKDBC-CATERING SVCS 11
PKDBC-CATERING SVCS,11
PKDBC-CATERING SVCS,11
PKDBC-CATERING SVCS; 11
PKDBC-WA SENATE 11/11-
PKDBC-SALTWATER UNITAR
PKDBC-LIGHT OF CHRIST
PKDBC-PAC.NW LIBRARY A
PKDBC-MILGARD 11/1-02
PKDBC-DEPT. TRADE/ECONO
PKDBC-AVANTA 10/12-14
PKDBC-SEA PUBLIC LIBRA
PKDBC-FW ARTS COMMISIO
PKDBC- UP PRESBYTERIAN,
PKDBC-HANSEL& GRETEL 1
PKDBC- PIONEER ELEMENTA
PKDBC-VA PUGET SD 10/1
PKDBC- WEYERHAEUSER - BEP
PKDBC-WORLD-VISION 10/
PKDBC-B.STOLTENBERG JD
PKDBC-FUSION 11/16-17
PKDBC-CATERING CONTEXT
PKDBC-CREATEIVE MEMORI
PKDBC-ELCA REGION 1 AD
PKDBC-BUNZEL 10/18/01
PKDBC-VA PUGET SOUND A
PKDBC-LEADERSHIP INSTI
PKDBC-CATERING SVCS
PKDBC-WORLD VISION MKT
PS-ASST BOXED LUNCHES
PKDBC-CATERING SVCS
PRCS-FOOD/BEV ARTS
10/23/01 PRCS-HELIUM TANK
11/09/01 CM-AGENDA SET. LUNCH
Amount Paid
--__nnnn-n n_n-n_nn_--n
37.70
37.70
13,535.41
13,535.41
0.00
171.06
544 .80
721.68
136.00
856.80
268.20
1,189.80
861.00
1,028.50
551.98
343.32
638.45
66.40
37.06
86.10
146.30
40.80
217.60
126.00
524 .88
403.00
59.22
341.60
2,142.42
505.80
312.20
214.35
17.60
4,243.52
3,152.88
626.40
304.96
134.10
306.04
21,320.82
53.86
53.86
34.10
34.10
nnn n__nn - ----- n_--- --
Page, 4
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10:08:34
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 5
000000 000000 0 ~ ~ ~ 0000000000 = = = = = ~ ~ = = = = = ~ = = = = = 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 = 0 = ~ = = = 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 = = = = = = = 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ = = 0 0 = ~ ~ = = = 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
_uu_u - -- - - -- u u u u u u u u u u - - n n u - u u u u u uu---- n--uuuuuun--u uunnuuu- nuu____uu-u-
163340 11/30/01 000475 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS 199085 10/20/01 MC-ALARM MONITORING SV 100.00 100.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
163341 11/30/01 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 087546 10/16/01 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 27.38
Voucher: Bank Code: key 087713 10/22/01 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT STIHL 16 .35 43.73
163342 11/30/01 000515 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT MSINET-APC 07/12/01 MSINET :APC CONNECTORS 195.84 195.84
Voucher: Bank Code: key
163343 11/30/01 000567 WA STATE-ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT MS02109001 10/31/01 PWD-WWHM TRAIN A.DOWER 150.00 150.00
Voucher: Bank Code: key
163344 11/30/01 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB 0.00
HVOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key
163345 11/30/01 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB 1014274 10/16/01 PS-CK BRAKES /R&R PADS 52.13
Voucher: Bank Code: key 1014309 10/17/01 FLEET REPAIRS/MAINTENA 54.38
1013890 09/28/01 PS-WIPERARM ASSEMB#901 84.33
1014261 10/15/01 PS-R&RLF DR PANEL-INST 250.90
1014037 10/05/01 PS-LOF #639 25.01
1014168 10/10/01 PS-CHARGING SYSTM #600 69.09
1014000 10/03/01 PS-TIRES REPAIR #903 13 .32
1013984 10/02/01 PS-INSTALL BULBS#632 50.94
1013983 10/02/01 PS-BRAKES/PADS/CALIPER 213 .40
1013989 10/02/01 PS-DIAGNOSTIC #626 38.84
1013994 10/03/01 PS-LOF/TIRES#636 244.19
1013 936 10/01/01 PS-FAN RELAY #503 104.83
1014094 10/08/01 PS-WIPER BLADES #507 24.39
1014127 10/09/01 PS-TIRES 215/70R #903 50.62
1014260 10/15/01 PS-#623 MIRROR ASSY/DR 218.25
1014356 10/20/01 PS-TIRES#903 215/70R15 49.20
1014351 10/19/01 PS-TIRES#638 225/60RER 73.00
1014373 10/20/01 PS-#615/ANTIFREZE/CLAM 125.34
1014479 10/25/01 PS-PARTS CLEANER #903 90.97
1014468 10/25/01 PS-LOF #516 M:55893 21.76
1014472 10/25/01 PS-LOF #583 27.45
1014294 10/17/01 PS-LOF#625 25.01
1014198 10/12/01 PS-LOF#521 25.01 1,932.36
163346 11/30/01 000581 TOOL TOWN INC 33488 10/10/01 PKM-AIR IMPACTOR/CABLE 195.79 195.79
Voucher: Bank Code: key
163347 11/30/01 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 007-307-50 11/02/01 PKM-WATER/IRRIGATION @ 327.48 327.48
Voucher: Bank Code: key
163348 11/30/01 000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY INC 5 11/01/01 PWS-2001 ASPHALT OVERL 45,364.46 45,364.46
Voucher: Bank Code: key
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - --- - - - u - - - - - - - u - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - u -
- - - - - - - - - - u - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Page: 5
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10:08:34
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page:
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
Date
Invoice
----n_--_--__---------------------- -
163349 11/30/01 000671
Voucher:
163350 11/30/01 000694
Voucher:
163351 11/30/01 000714
Voucher:
163352 11/30/01 000723
Voucher:
163353 11/30/01 000730
Voucher:
163354 11/30/01 000748
Voucher:
163355 11/30/01 000784
Voucher:
163356 11/30/01 000799
Voucher:
163357 11/30/01 000804
Voucher:
163358 11/30/01 000808
Voucher:
163359 11/30/01 000846
Voucher:
163360 11/30/01 000885
Voucher:
163361 11/30/01 000891
Voucher:
163362 11/30/01 000947
Voucher:
163363 11/30/01 000955
Voucher:
163364 11/30/01 000960
Voucher:
------------------
H D FOWLER COMPANY
Bank Code: key
1061584
1061583
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMPANY 68683586
Bank Code: key
SKY HAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY
Bank Code: key
AGOO-106A
SOUND RESOURCE MGMT GROUP I FWP-O14
Bank Code: key
ENTRANCO INC
Bank Code: key
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Bank Code: key
31495
35910-11
011018
Inv. Date Description
Amount Paid
---------------------- --------------- ------------------
529.72
10/09/01 PKM-UNIV. SOLENOID/REPA
10/09/01 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL
10/17/01 PKRLS-FIRST AID SUPPLI
09/18/01 PKRLS-SPORTS CAMP COOR
10/31/01 PWSWR-SLD WST RECY COL
01/17/01 PW-COSTCO GAS STATION/
10/26/01 PWSCIP-23RD AVE S RD I
08/22/01 MSDP:HTML PROGRAMMING-
PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN S1548967-0 08/02/01 MSTEL- 6408D DISPLAY P
Bank Code: key
JET CHEVROLET
Bank Code: key
CTCS49735
ROBERT H LEWIS & ASSOCIATES 1124-01
Bank Code: key
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
Bank Code: key
ICMA
Bank Code: key
PARKER PAINT MANUFACTURING
Bank Code: key
OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN
Bank Code: key
YOUR INC DBA
Bank Code: key
MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANY
Bank Code: key
0647822
206941
22180309
10/19/01 MSFLT-#763 LOF M4342
11/02/01 COURT REPORTING/DEJA V
10/03/01 PKM-LIGHTING SUPPLIES
10/14/01 CM-2002 ICMA DUES :MOSE
11/15/01 PKM-FRENCH LAKE SIGN P
11/14 STMT 11/14/01 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES
2699
AB111557S
MATTHEW BENDER & COMPANY IN 17612063
Bank Code: key
-- -- -- -- --- ----
11/20/01 MC-JANITORIAL SVC NOV.
10/31/01 SWMM-SUPPLIES
10/26/01 LAW-WA APPL VOL 102
130.20
399.52
128.66
128.66
582.40
582.40
2,281.11
2,281.11
1,817.83
36,343.41
38,161.24
229.00
229.00
1,393.08
1,393.08
32.19
32.19
78.75
78.75
14.04
14.04
912.00
912.00
24.23
24.23
770.22
770.22
660.00
660.00
35.09
35.09
16.97
16.97
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - n -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ---
Page: 6
0 chklst
11/30/200110,08'34
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 7
Check
Vendor
"""" = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
Date
163365 11/30/01 000977
Voucher,
163366 11/30/01 001013
Voucher,
163367 11/30/01 001014
Voucher,
163368 11/30/01 001033
Voucher,
163369 11/30/01 001046
Voucher'
163370 11/30/01 001061
Voucher,
163371 11/30/01 001079
Voucher,
163372 11/30/01 001090
Voucher,
163373 11/30/01 001124
Voucher,
163374 11/30/01 001127
Voucher,
163375 11/30/01 001131
Voucher,
163376 11/30/01 001189
Voucher,
163377 11/30/01 001206
Voucher,
163378 11/30/01 001241
Voucher,
163379 11/30/01 001285
Voucher,
uu - - - u - u u -- - u --
- --u u - uu - - uu
MEASUREMENT RESEARCH CORP
Bank Code, key
DUFFLE BAG INC
Bank Code, key
Invoice
1031001B
039145
SKCSRA-SOCCER REFEREES ASSO AUG-OCT
Bank Code, key
WA STATE-DEPT OF LICENSING
Bank Code, key
EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION
Bank Code, key
Inv.Date Description
Amount Paid
10/31/01 PWS-2001 MANUAL PAVEME
-- ------------u- u_-uu_u-uu_-
3,500.00
11/14/01 PKM-WORK COAT/BLACKS HI
11/16/01 PKRLS-SOCCER OFFICIALS
PWA-LIC RN 11/13/01 PWA-PROF LICENSE RENEW
PWA LIC RN 11/20/01 PWA-LICENSE RENEWAL
PWS LIC RE 11/20/01 PWS-LICENSE RENEWAL
4627277
10/25/01 PS-CREDIT INFORMATION
WA STATE-AGRICULTURE DEPART PKM-LIC RN 11/16/01 PKM-PESTICIDE LIC RENE
Bank Code, key PWS-LIC RN 11/19/01 PWS-PESTICIDE LICENSE
PKM RECERT 11/20/01 PKM-PESTICIDE RECERTS
SHRM-SOCIETY HUM RESOURCE M 2000977617 11/03/01 MSHR-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
Bank Code, key
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES IN JN21274
Bank Code, key
VERIZON WIRELESS
Bank Code, key
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS
Bank Code, key
10/19/01 SWM-ASBESTOS SURVEY
1004-65261 11/05/01 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME
AG 01-43
EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC 001562
Bank Code, key 001564
001563
PETTY CASH
Bank Code, key
12244
10/11/01 CDBG-DENTAL ACCESS PRO
10/13/01 MSFLT-LOF#302 M7072
10/13/01 MSFLT-LOF#301 M,11285
10/13/01 MSFLT-LOF#300 M,7242
11/27/01 LAW-PARKING, KIRKPATRIC
WSSUA-WA STATE SOFTBALL UMP AG 00- 095A 10/10/01 PKRCS-SOFTBALL UMPIRE
Bank Code, key
WEST COAST AWARDS
Bank Code, key
ALPINE PRODUCTS INC
Bank Code, key
37784/92
TM-46299
--uu--u_u-
10/16/01 PKRLS-PROGRAM SHIRTS
11/09/01 PKM-FIELD PAINT
3,500.00
200.70
200.70
4,760.00
4,760.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
300.00
21.76
21.76
25.00
25.00
150.00
200.00
160.00
160.00
1,280.00
1,280.00
431. 54
431.54
2,575.00
2,575.00
32.50
32.50
32.50
97.50
269.21
269.21
5,440.00
5,440.00
1,464.88
1,464.88
322.97
322.97
uuuuu_--
Page, 7
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10,08,34
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 8
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
Date
163380 11/30/01 001427
Voucher,
163381 11/30/01 001430
Voucher,
163382 11/30/01 001431
Voucher,
163383 11/30/01 001481
Voucher,
163384 11/30/01 001593
Voucher,
163385 11/30/01 001601
Voucher,
163386 11/30/01 001604
Voucher,
163387 11/30/01 001618
Voucher,
163388 11/30/01 001630
Voucher,
163389 11/30/01 001748
Voucher,
163390 11/30/01 001805
Voucher'
163391 11/30/01 001856
Voucher,
163392 11/30/01 001879
Voucher,
163393 11/30/01 001902
Voucher,
163394 11/30/01 001990
Voucher'
163395 11/30/01 002010
Voucher,
n_-_u_nn-
WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT
Bank Code, key
WHITE CAP/BURKE
Bank Code, key
ICON MATERIALS INC
Bank Code, key
CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC
Bank Code, key
FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC
Bank Code, key
TAK INC
Bank Code, key
BALL, GIG I Y
Bank Code, key
SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW GLASS
Bank Code, key
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
Bank Code, key
EVERSON'S ECONO- VAC INC
Bank Code, key
VADIS NORTHWEST
Bank Code, key
Invoice
_n- n_____---
Q1125988
J21982
761398
21126- 01
24025
N21126-1
3292371
3296764
3292708
10166
5593/5587
CA15597+
1049429
Inv. Date Description
Amount Paid
n_nnn_n n_____n_n-n _nnn__nnn_n
850.72
11/09/01 PWS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL
10/17/01 MSFLT-HOSE/FLUID BACKH
10/24/01 SWMM-MISC SUPPLIES
11/05/01 PWS-01 ASPHALT OVERLAY
10/09/01 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT
11/05/01 PWS-2001 ASPHALT OVERL
10/11/01 SWM-KITTS WETLANDS MON
11/12/01 PWSCIP-PACIFIC HWY SO
10/15/01 PWSCIP-PACIFIC HWY SO
08/29/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES
11/08/01 MSHR-2NO PG LETTERHEAD
10/23/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#1559
10/04/01 PS-WINDSHIELD REPR#700
OCT INVOIC 11/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING
015906
00012173
ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION 33804
Bank Code, key
EARTH TECH INC
Bank Code, key
MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE
Bank Code, key
WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME MAT
Bank Code, key
KCM INC
Bank Code, key
10/29/01 SWM-VACUUM/JET RODDING
10/31/01 PWSWR-LITTER CNTRL SVC
10/31/01 PWS-STREET SWEEPING SV
4373771890 11/01/01 PWST-S. 288TH ST (SR99
3498
113/0500
135240
nn__nn__nn-
11/01/01 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV
11/05/01 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL
11/09/01 PWSWM-MIRROR LAKE/FISH
763.56
87.16
79.09
79.09
1,857.03
760.84
19,182.36
21,800.23
2,458.13
26,843.30
22,983.78
52,285.21
112.06
112.06
425.21
425.21
87.50
87.50
213.25
213.25
1,035.84
1,035.84
1,833.73
1,833.73
4,020.00
4,020.00
8,213.20
8,213.20
7,239.50
7,239.50
2,066.26
2,066.26
81.10
81.10
1,341.74
1,341.74
----- - ---- ------ -- ---- --- ---- ------- --- - -- ------ -- ----
Page, 8
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10,08,34
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 9
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~" ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = =
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~""""" = ~ ~""" ~ ~"""" ~ = = = = ~ = ~ ="
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Descript ion Amount Paid Check Total
~~uuu u_u~u ~ ~ - ~ u -~ n u u n - - u n n n n nn n u n u nn n un__U n~u~--~~~_nn~n_n n_nnnnnu ~-~uu~nuU-n-
163396 11/30/01 002204 WILBUR~ELLIS COMPANY 24-104768 11/07/01 PKM~CPL.PK.NOVEMBER FE 881.17
Voucher, Bank Code, key 24 -103571 09/25/01 PKM~FERTILIZER/INV#24~ 724.61 1,605.78
163397 11/30/01 002231 SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC 96621 10/31/01 CDPL-ENV REV,ST LUKE'S 450.40
Voucher, Bank Code, key 96634 10/31/01 CDPL~ENV REV,FANCHER 98.26
96630 10/31/01 CDPL~ENV REV,FW BUSINE 426.50 975.16
163398 11/30/01 002386 PAWLAK, SUSAN CA14849+ 10/30/01 MC~INTERPRETER, CA#1484 250.00 250.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163399 11/30/01 002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 01F5824 10/29/01 SWMM~MISC. SUPPLIES 11 7.22 11 7.22
Voucher' Bank Code, key
163400 11/30/01 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 1-304885 10/01/01 PKRLS~PEST CONTROL SVC 51.14 51.14
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163401 11/30/01 002557 PETTY CASH FUND~PARKS MAINT 12202 11/20/01 PKM~MILEAGE/D LEIDER 99.61 99.61
Voucher' Bank Code, key
163402 11/30/01 002566 QWEST TAC~366464 10/25/01 PKDBC~DIRECTORY AD 106.60 106.60
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163403 11/30/01 002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C. 174942 07 /23/01 LAW~LEGAL SVCS (SW356 34,208.70
Voucher, Bank Code, key 176156 08/22/01 LAW~LEGAL SERVICES (G) 325.58 34,534.28
163404 11/30/01 002717 WASHINGTON FIRM LTD, THE 110001 10/31/01 MSHR~TRAINING/SEXUAL H 2,000.00 2,000.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163405 11/30/01 002797 LOMBARDO, V MYRIAM CA#22100 11/06/01 MC~INTERPRETER,CA#2210 40.00 40.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163406 11/30/01 002899 ADOLF SON ASSOCIATES INC 019990320~ 10/31/01 CDPL~ENV REV;NOVASTAR 535.06 535.06
Voucher' Bank Code, key
163407 11/30/01 003048 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DE 012191 11/20/01 PS-PARKING FEES~L. LED 238.90 238.90
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163408 11/30/01 003060 OHNO, JOHN CA#55270FW 10/19/01 MC~INTERPRETER, CA#5527 40.00 40.00
Voucher' Bank Code, key
163409 11/30/01 003138 NORMED 12378-3687 10/10/01 PS~GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL 338.59
Voucher, Bank Code, key 12378~3699 10/24/01 PS~RESPIRATOR N95 PYRA 156.90
12378~3693 10/17 /01 PS~GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL 103.91 599.40
163410 11/30/01 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 29981 09/19/01 PKM~ALARM MONITORING S 164.18
Voucher, Bank Code, key 30323 10/28/01 PKM~ALARM MONITORING S 32.64 196.82
- u ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - - ~~ - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - - - - ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ n ~ ~ ~
~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ u - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~-
Page' 9
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10: 08: 34
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 10
Check
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
Date
Invoice
Inv.Date Description
- - - - - ---- - ------ -- ----- ----- - - - --- -- ----------
163411 11/30/01 003193
Voucher:
163412 11/30/01 003209
Voucher:
163413 11/30/01 003399
Voucher:
163414 11/30/01 003440
Voucher:
163415 11/30/01 003466
Voucher:
163416 11/30/01 003520
Voucher:
163417 11/30/01 003560
Voucher:
163418 11/30/01 003563
Voucher:
163419 11/30/01 003565
Voucher:
16342011/30/01 003600
Voucher:
163421 11/30/01 003645
Voucher:
163422 11/30/01 003697
Voucher:
163423 11/30/01 003718
Voucher:
163424 11/30/01 003736
Voucher:
163425 11/30/01 003837
Voucher:
163426 11/30/01 003898
Voucher:
-- - - -- ---- ----- - ---- - - -------
XP SOFTWARE INC
Bank Code: key
WASHINGTON POLYGRAPH
Bank Code: key
KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY
Bank Code: key
BILL HATCH SPORTS
Bank Code: key
2963
01-006
CA#20604+
69080-00
LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY IN 199374
Bank Code: key
PHUNG, NOVA C
Bank Code: key
HUNTERS TREE SERVICE
Bank Code: key
---------------------- --
10/22/01 SWM-SOFTWARE UPGRADE
11/01/01 PS-PRE-EMP POLYGRAPHS
11/05/01 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2060
03/30/01 PKRCS- (6)SOCCER BALLS:
10/12/01 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIE
CA#200933+ 11/09/01 MC-INTERPRETER: CA#2009
1067
1066
VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTE 1029
Bank Code: key
MONAK INC
Bank Code: key
SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES INC
Bank Code: key
1806
11296
AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE 1840
Bank Code: key
SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
Bank Code: key
223256
JENKINS, HARDY & ASSOC, PLL 10292001
Bank Code: key NOV STMT
NORTHWEST TOWING INC
Bank Code: key
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Bank Code: key
KING COUNTY RADIO
Bank Code: key
6214
FW6324
10/29/01 PWS-TREE TRIMNG & RMVL
10/29/01 PWS-TREE REMOVAL
10/25/01 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS
11/11/01 PS-UNIFORM DRY CLEANIN
11/09/01 MSDP/PS: IMAGING SYSTEM
11/06/01 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT
10/16/01 PWS-CLOTHING
10/29/01 LAW-PUB DEF/QTRLY RECO
11/01/01 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENDER SV
09/05/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES
10/26/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES
F6588V411 10/13/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
000F6588V4 10/20/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES
300662
30343
30339
10/31/01 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES
10/29/01 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES
10/29/01 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ---
Amount Paid
795.00
250.00
690.00
65.16
194.50
80.00
1,384.65
1,303.20
632.00
2,253.52
2,572.80
7,116.60
214 .12
208.52
16,102.00
101.33
145.52
83.08
23.39
3,762.50
272.50
42.50
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - -- --
795.00
250.00
690.00
65.16
194.50
80.00
2,687.85
632.00
2,253.52
2,572.80
7,116.60
214.12
16,310.52
246.85
106.47
4,077.50
Page: 10
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10,08,34
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 11
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
-----u -------- ----U_----------U_--U_---U_----- --UUU_- UU_--- ---------huuu_---- --------- ------------------
163427 11/30/01 003919 LE, HUAN CA#22528FW 11/12/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2252 35.00 35.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163428 11/30/01 004054 WICKLANDER-ZULAWSKI & ASSOC 37370 11/08/01 PS-INTERVIEW COURSE 395.00 395.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163429 11/30/01 004060 DRILLCO NATIONAL GROUP INC 216243 11/08/01 SWMM-MISC TOOLS 317.00 317.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163430 11/30/01 004169 WWGCSA-WESTERN WASHINGTON G PKS-REGIST 11/16/01 PKM-FIELD MGT TRAINING 120.00 120.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163431 11/30/01 004190 BAYLEY, LILLY MAY CA#19293+ 11/06/01 MC-INTERPRETER, CA#l92 9 50.00 50.00
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163432 11/30/01 004218 TIM CO INC 70315 10/31/01 PWS-MISC SUPPLIES 44.39 44.39
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163433 11/30/01 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 003385 10/13/01 CDPL-NOTICE,RAMSAY SHO 126.50
Voucher, Bank Code, key 003384 10/13/01 CDPL-NOTICE,25% THRESH 126.50
003383 10/13/01 CDPL-NOTICE, CITY CORE 126.50
3223 07/18/01 CDPL-NOTICE,LAND USE A 158.13 537.63
163434 11/30/01 004293 MOTOROLA-MDUG 13201658 09/27/01 MSDP/PS VEH RADIO MODE 9,576.91 9,576.91
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163435 11/30/01 004298 KOSOFF-ROACH, MELANIE E SEPT INSTR 09/01/01 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES; 0 1,450.68 1,450.68
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163436 11/30/01 004317 RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PHOTO 1026058240 10/02/01 CAMERA SUPPLIES/FILM D 130.34 130.34
Voucher, Bank Code, key
163437 11/30/01 004397 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 10-1 06/01/01 PW-PALISADES RETREAT B 421.65
Voucher, Bank Code, key 12-1 08/01/01 PWD-EXP REV,E CAMPUS C 84.33
12 -3 08/01/01 PW-NEW HIGH SCHOOL 5,776.60 6,282.58
163438 11/30/01 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 2498 10/29/01 CDPL-MISC CODE AMENDME 500.40
Voucher, Bank Code, key 2500 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,SAVON DRU 83.82
2499 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,NEW H 10.20
2488 10/29/01 CDPL-EXP REV,GLENWOOD 836.17
2490 10/29/01 CDPL-EXP REV,U-HAUL FA 924.00
2497 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,STATI 83.82
2496 10/29/01 CDPL-MISC CODE AMENDME 45.00
2487 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,ST FR 43.56
2493 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,KELLER SU 44.22
2495 10/29/01 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV,FW C 214.50
2489 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,RESIDENTI 16.50
2491 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,NEW H 1,188.00
2486 10/29/01 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV,E CA 13 7.94 4,128.13
---- - u u_-- u- u_-- u_---- -_u - -----
-_uu_--_u_--u_---
-- - -uu- -_u - ----- - ------ - --
Page, 11
a chklst
11/30/2001 10: 08: 35
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page: 12
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
163439 11/30/01 004494
Voucher:
163440 11/30/01 004566
Voucher:
163441 11/30/01 004599
Voucher:
163442 11/30/01 004622
Voucher:
163443 11/30/01 004644
Voucher:
163444 11/30/01 004701
Voucher:
163445 11/30/01 004763
Voucher:
163446 11/30/01 004840
Voucher:
163447 11/30/01 004855
Voucher:
163448 11/30/01 004863
Voucher:
163449 11/30/01 004895
Voucher:
163450 11/30/01 004963
Voucher:
163451 11/30/01 004977
Voucher:
163452 11/30/01 005004
Voucher:
163453 11/30/01 005019
Voucher:
_n - - - nnn n_n -_n_-
__n-un
ONSET COMPUTER CORPORATION
Bank Code: key
G&M HONEST PERFORMANCE
Bank Code: key
GOLF LANDSCAPING INC
Bank Code: key
Invoice
nn_n-h
63909.1
29824
298 -1
Inv.Date Description
Amount Paid
nn _nn--nn_n- nn_-n__n-n-n
937.00
10/17/01 SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES
10/10/01 MSFLT-ANTI FEEZE/WASHE
06/26/01 HYLEBOS CABIN PARK TRA
WA STATE-TRAFFIC SAFETY COM PS WTSC CN 11/05/01 PS-WTSC CONFERENCE FEE
Bank Code: key
PACIFIC PLANTS INC
Bank Code: key
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
Bank Code: key
SHOCKLEY, BILL
Bank Code: key
EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE
Bank Code: key
WST INC
Bank Code: key
VALLEY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY
Bank Code: key
ABOU-ZAKI, KAMAL
Bank Code: key
SOUND PUBLISHING INC
Bank Code: key
BLIMP IE SUBS & SALADS
Bank Code: key
PWS-TREE R 11/15/01 PWS-TREE REPLACEMENT
0002682579 10/25/01 MSTEL-CE.LLULAR AIRTIME
PS REIMB
100433
100418
100419
100460
100417
12846NOV
0380922
11/05/01 PS-REIMB: PERDIEM EX PEN
10/09/01 PS-COMPUTER INSTALL/LA
10/03/01 PS-INSTAL COMPUTER#900
10/03/01 PS-INSTALL COMPUTER#90
10/17/01 PS-REPAIR/SIREN
10/03/01 PS-POLICE GRAPHICS
11/02/01 MSGIS-BLACK INK SYSTEM
10/25/01 SWMM-WASH RACK STL LK
CA#0021122 10/24/01 CA#21122+ INTERPRETER
010174
5976
MORRIS HANSEN ENTERPRISES I 9936
Bank Code: key
10/20/01 MSHR-POLICE RECRUIT AD
11/06/01 CC-COUNCIL MTG REFRESH
09/27/01 PRLS-GLASS CLNG
UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST IN 21267696-0 10/05/01 PWS-BACKHOE/LOADER/FUE
Bank Code: key OCT/NOV 10/26/01 SWM-RENTAL FORKLIFT
n n-n- - --_n- nn-
937.00
6.86
6.86
23,015.66
23,015.66
300.00
300.00
16,646.40
16,646.40
1,471.93
1,471.93
43.00
43.00
634.18
679.97
620.29
32.55
217.00
2,183.99
876.32
876.32
126.08
126.08
346.94
346.94
162.00
162.00
56.80
56.80
103.00
103.00
587.71
2,990.13
3,577.84
--n-n-n__---n-n-
Page: 12
0 chklst
11/30/200110,08,35
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 13
Check
Vendor
0 ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 ~ = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = 0 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
Date
163454 11/30/01 005043
Voucher,
163455 11/30/01 005098
Voucher,
163456 11/30/01 005180
Voucher,
163457 11/30/01 005187
Voucher,
163458 11/30/01 005208
Voucher,
163459 11/30/01 005302
Voucher,
163460 11/30/01 005335
Voucher,
163461 11/30/01 005340
Voucher,
163462 11/30/01 005341
Voucher,
163463 11/30/01 005421
Voucher,
163464 11/30/01 005478
Voucher,
163465 11/30/01 005501
Voucher,
163466 11/30/01 005507
Voucher,
163467 11/30/01 005536
Voucher,
163468 11/30/01 005539
Voucher,
Invoice
u_--uuu__uuu- uu--uu
Inv.Date Description
u__u_u_--uuuuu -
MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT T0903702
Bank Code, key T0902602
BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO S
Bank Code, key
241801
241611
241595
241602
241628
241598
241570
CRISIS MANAGEMENT CONSULT IN 01-26
Bank Code, key
LINDSAY, JAMES
Bank Code, key
COMMERCIAL CARD SERVICES
Bank Code, key
PS-REIMB
11/16/01 SWMM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL
10/25/01 SWMM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL
10/16/01
10/09/01
10/08/01
10/09/01
10/10/01
10/09/01
10/08/01
PS-REPAIRS #902
PS-REPAIRS #620
PS-REPAIRS #621
PS-HEADLAMPS #516
PS-LOF #632
PS-BRAKE PADS/RELINE/R
PS-REPAIRS #627 EXAUST
10/03/01 PWA-EMER MGMT CONSLT S
11/05/01 PS-REIMB,PER DIEM EXPE
MARY FABER 10/31/01 MSF-CITY VISA,BATTERIE
RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC 3229
Bank Code, key
ECO NORTHWEST
Bank Code, key
SENIOR SERVICES OF SEATTLE
Bank Code, key
DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA
Bank Code, key
BARGER, KENNETH
Bank Code, key
LEBEL, SHELLEY
Bank Code, key
ANDREWS, AMY
Bank Code, key
CLIFTON, THOMAS E
Bank Code, key
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC
Bank Code, key
SEMISI-TUPOU, VAIVAO
Bank Code, key
-- -- ------ ------ -_u_-- - --- ------- --_u -------
4032
11/19/01 PWS-ROW LANDSCAPE MAIN
10/31/01 CDPL-CFW MARKET ANALYS
PRCS SR LN 11/13/01 PRCS-SR LUNCH PROG
CA21353FW+ 10/09/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2135
CA#18969+
10/29/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#1896
PRCS REMBU 11/06/01 PRCS-3 INFLATABLES
PRCS-REIMB 11/19/01 PRCS-FILM/PHOTO MNTS
CA17321+0C 11/13/01 MC-INTERPRETER, CA#1732
10/15-11/5 11/16/01 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES, 10
1001295581 10/24/01 SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES
CAO022007+ 10/30/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2200
Amount Paid
--- uuu--u__u-u-
907.32
1,486.15
2,393.47
534.75
536.49
229.20
24.41
15.77
263.75
65.43
1,669.80
1,750.00
1,750.00
43.00
43.00
362.29
362.29
7,406.28
7,406.28
15,101.89
15,101.89
609.00
609.00
660.00
660.00
80.00
80.00
94.07
142.38
236.45
360.00
360.00
756.00
756.00
24.20
24.20
227.49
227.4 9
u__u-uu_u-
Page, 13
0 chklst
11/30/200110,08,35
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page, 14
Check
Date
Vendor
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Check Total
----------
163469 11/30/01 005545
Voucher,
163470 11/30/01 005546
Voucher,
163471 11/30/01 005565
Voucher,
163472 11/30/01 005568
Voucher,
163473 11/30/01 005614
Voucher,
163474 11/30/01 005617
Voucher,
163475 11/30/01 005622
Voucher,
163476 11/30/01 005623
Voucher,
163477 11/30/01 005625
Voucher,
163478 11/30/01 005657
Voucher,
163479 11/30/01 005668
Voucher,
163480 11/30/01 005715
Voucher,
163481 11/30/01 005817
Voucher,
163482 11/30/01 005828
Voucher,
163483 11/30/01 005859
Voucher,
163484 11/30/01 005920
Voucher,
YSI INCORPORATED
Bank Code, key
ARCHIVE INDEX SYSTEMS INC
Bank Code, key
WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS
Bank Code, key
Invoice
----------
403641
099513
1365
KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DIVIS 200755
Bank Code, key 200753
AMB TOOLS & EQUIPMENT CO IN 255159
Bank Code, key
BURNS, ED
Bank Code, key
CHELAN COUNTY TREASURER'S
Bank Code, key
THUILLIER, JENNIFER
Bank Code, key
I/O SOLUTIONS LLC
Bank Code, key
DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES
Bank Code, key
PS-REIMB
Inv. Date Descript ion
---------------------- -
11/08/01 SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES
11/09/01 MSDMS,DMS SFTWR MAINT
11/05/01 MSCOM-CELL ANTENNA
11/02/01 PWS-MISC. SUPPLIES
11/02/01 PKM-SKATE PARK SIGNAGE
10/23/01 PKM-BRASS FITTINGS/FLU
11/13/01 PS-REIMB,PER DIEM EXPN
7515AN JAI 10/09/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES SEPT
PWSWR-DESI 11/09/01 PWSWR-DESIGN SERVICES
PWSWR DES I 11/09/01 PWSWR-DESIGN SERVICES
C9962A
10/30/01 MSHR, PO TESTING STUDY
ABOOO03648 10/31/01 PS-AUTOTRACKXP
LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND KOLK OCT2001
Bank Code, key
ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS INC
Bank Code, key
CITY OF FIFE
Bank Code, key
K6163838K
004026
004068
MARINE VIEW SAND & GRAVEL L 731
Bank Code, key
MDE INC
Bank Code, key
URS CORPORATION
Bank Code, key
-------------------
2232
94217
-------------
11/02/01 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENSE SVC
11/02/01 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE
10/05/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES SEPT.
11/05/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES, OCT 2
11/12/01 PWS-MIXED INERTS
10/13/01 MSDP-PS ADORE PALM PIL
10/03/01 SWM-ESA/NPDES GAP ANAL
Amount Paid
---- ------------------
282.70
282.70
5,430.00
5,430.00
19.38
19.38
57.75
504.78
562.53
200.63
200.63
60.00
60.00
14,976.00
14,976.00
130.00
375.00
505.00
625.00
625.00
695.00
695.00
1,950.00
1,950.00
1,258.30
1,258.30
20,097.00
20,664.00
40,761.00
367.10
367.10
628.32
628.32
12,773.01
12,773.01
----- -- ------ ---- --- ------ --- ----
Page, 14
0 chklst
11/30/2001 10,08,35
Check List
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
Page' 15
Check
Vendor
= = = = ~ = = = = = ~ ~ ~ = = ~ ~ ~ = = ~ = = ~ ~ = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = ~ = = = = ~ = = ~ = = = = ~ ~ = = = = = ~ ~ = = = = ~ ~ = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = ~ = ~ ~ = = = = = = = = ~ = =
= = = = ~ ~ ~ ~ = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = ~ = ~ = = ~ ~ = = ~ = = = = = = = ~ ~ =
Check Total
Date
Invoice
- u- - u --u- --u u -nu_- UUn UU- - -U-n U-
163485 11/30/01 005927
Voucher,
163486 11/30/01 005934
Voucher,
163487 11/30/01 005940
Voucher,
163488 11/30/01 005944
Voucher,
163489 11/30/01 006028
Voucher,
163490 11/30/01 006035
Voucher,
163491 11/30/01 006039
Voucher,
163492 11/30/01 006040
Voucher,
163493 11/30/01 006042
Voucher,
163494 11/30/01 006043
Voucher,
163495 11/30/01 006044
Voucher,
163496 11/30/01 006045
Voucher,
163497 11/30/01 006046
Voucher,
163498 11/30/01 006047
Voucher,
163499 11/30/01 006051
Voucher,
163500 11/30/01 703050
Voucher,
192 Checks in this report
U- - U - U - n U - U - u- n - - - U U
LEE, STANLEY S
Bank Code, key
K P TRANSLATION SERVICES
Bank Code, key
RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL
Bank Code, key
INDEPENDENT
Bank Code, key
FREEBORN LAW OFFICES PS
Bank Code, key
NACCARATO, STEVE D.
Bank Code, key
VISION QUEST CO.
Bank Code, key
WASHINGTON CISM NETWORK
Bank Code, key
R & T HOOD & DUCT SERVICES
Bank Code, key
KEARNS, LAUREN
Bank Code, key
SOUNDVIEW POTTERY, RUSSELL
Bank Code, key
CA#16504FW 10/08/01 DC-INTERPRETER,CA#1650
Inv.Date Description
CA#21980
RU-7451
09/20/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2198
10/10/01 PS-PS POL AIR CARTRIDG
ASL OCT200 10/23/01 DC-INTERPRETER,TRAFFIC
OCT8-10TH
10/29/01 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{OCT8-
PARC-ART E 10/23/01 ART EXHIBIT AT DUMAS B
998377
PS CISM
23074
08/29/01 PS-SHOE COVERS
10/30/01 PS-CISM NETWORK CONF F
08/20/01 PRLS-FIRE SYS SV CALL
PRCS J/ALI 11/01/01 PRCS-JUROR-ARTS ALIVE
PRCS J/ALI 11/01/01 PRCS-JUROR-ARTS ALIVE
THE ART DOOR/GALLERY ROW, M PRCS J.ALI 11/01/01 PRCS-JUROR-ARTS ALIVE
Bank Code, key
CLAYMORE, INC
Bank Code, key
HSS INTERNATIONAL, INC
Bank Code, key
GRANGER COMPANY, THE
Bank Code, key
REID, JANINE O.
Bank Code, key
PS C.A.R.
PS SNIPER
00000452
REIMB
UUU-U_U
09/13/01 PS-C.A.R. INSTR COURSE
11/02/01 PS-ADV SNIPER TRAINING
11/03/01 PWS-APPRAISAL
10/25/01 PWCIP-APPRAISAL REIMBU
Amount Paid
50.00
50.00
584.92
584.92
549.48
549.48
150.00
150.00
500.00
500.00
100.00
100.00
40.00
40.00
265.00
265.00
70.17
70.17
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
75.00
200.00
200.00
875.00
875.00
300.00
300.00
750.00
750.00
Total Checks,
752,535.08
Page, 15
MEETING DATE:
January IS, 2002
ITEM# )l:Ce..)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
Noyember 2001 Financial Report
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
[g CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: November 2001 Financial Report
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was not reviewed by the Finance Committee due to
cancellation of the December 26"' meeting. Forward directly to the January IS"' Council meeting.
-....---------------------------- -------------....-----------....-----....----------
-----------------------------.-----
---------------------------
PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye for the approyal of the Noyember 2001 Financial Report."
~~~~-~::~~~:;~~~~:~---~ -- --
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISEO - 05110/2001
12/24/2001
TO:
FROM:
cc:
DAVID MOSELEY, CITY MANAGER
ROBERT STERBANK, CITY ATTORNEY
KATHY McCLUNG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
CARY ROE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
JENNIFER SCHRODER, PARKS DIRECTOR
IWEN WANG, MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
ANNE KIRKPATRICK, PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR
ANDREW ADEKOY A, FINANCIAL ANALYST
THO KRAUS, FINANCIAL PLANNING SUPERVISOR
DEREK MATHESON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
DONNA HANSON, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
KRISTA OSBORNE, PUBLIC SAFETY COMMANDER
LAURA CAMDEN, PUBLIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALIST
SANDRA WARTER, MUNICIPAL COURT ADMINISTRATOR
NOVEMBER 2001 FINANCIAL REPORT
PG# REPORT
1 - 19 NOVEMBER 2001 FINANCIAL REPORT
20 -21
22 - 24
25 - 32
33
34
35 - 36
37
38 - 39
40 -44
45 - 50
51 - 54
55
56 - 57
58 - 63
REVENUES
PARKS & RECREATION REVENUES
BUILDING PERMITS/ZONING FEESIPLAN CHECK FEES
ROW PERMITSIPLAN REVIEW FEES/INSPECTION FEES
DEPARTMENTAL VARIANCE ANALYSIS
CITY COUNCIL
MUNICIPAL COURT
CITY MANAGER
LAW
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION
PUBLIC WORKS
SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SAFETY
K:\FIN\MFR\O Imfr\COV I.. R.DOC
CITY IF
~ EIJERAL
~~AY
!.!, -417(J
('(,1-+0(,2
CCA City for All of Us'
2001 Projêc::teð\Revenues & Expenditures
Overview
Significant Events
General Government
Revenues
Expenditures
Attachment A
2 -13
14-18
19
November 2001 Monthly Financial Report
This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax
Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Strategic Reserve,
Airport Strategic Reserve, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Centre. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures
fmancial activity through October for the years 1996 through 2001.
~.~1U:!i~':f :;f.
Highlights of Governor's Proposed 2002 Supplemental Budget:
Some of the higJùights of Governor's 2002 supplemental budget include a $25.2 million elimination of Law and Justice MVET
replacement funds. These funds would have been sent in July of 2002 for the year 2003. However, this fund elimination is not
accompanied by any repeal of requirements or any replacement revenue sources. Another highlight is an $18 million elimination
of Public Health MVET replacement funds. This also is not accompanied by any repeal of requirement or any replacement revenue
sources. The employer pension rates for PERS dropped by 0.84%. The employee tates for PERS 2 also dropped to zero. However,
the employee contribution rates for PERS I remain unchanged. These reductions in tates are a result of change in actuarial
methods.
State Forecasts an $813 Million Reduction in Revenue:
Due to the tragic event of September I I'h, the State have had to revise its previously estimated General Fund revenue forecast for
the 2001-03 biennium. The state reduced Its September estimate by $813 million from $22,021.7 million to $21,208.7 million in
November. Of the $813 million reduction, $67.1 million is based on its collection experience since the initial September's
estimate, $34.0 million is due to the passage of initiatives 747 and 773, and $69.4 million is due to lower interest earnings as a
result of lower availability of funds for investment. The remaining $642.6 million reduction is due to weaker economic outlook,
and an expectation of a national recession.
Unemployment Rate at a 1 Oyear high:
Employment fell sharply for the second month III a row in November, and unemployment rate reached a IO-year high of 5.7%,
stated the U.S. Department of Labor. Non-farm payroll employment dropped by 331.000 following an even larger decline in
October. November's Job losses were widespread as was the case in October. In the Northwest, Boeing contributed to the national
Citv of Federal Wav
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
unemployment figures by giving out 60-day lay-ofT notices to apptOximately 20,000 employees on the 26'" of November. In
addition, there was a 384,000 unemployment insurance claim for the week ending December 15, 2001. However, this was an
11,000 decrease ftOm the previous week's reported figure of395,000.
GOVERNM]¡;NT AL REVENUES
General governmental operating revenue collections through November total $40,515,008, which is $2,948,737 or 7.8% above the
year-to-date budget of $37,566,272. Of this amount, $158,072 is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the
payment of debt services. Attachment A ptOvides a comparison of year-to-date revenues by major sources for 2001 with
comparative figures for the past 5 years.
REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES
Period Ending December 31, 2001
~ I~~~ . .2001:Ri!ViSedBLidaet . . °kl""ls ". .'.'. ".' Varian"" .
"..'.. ..T~róiJg/! . :T6!'Q!>91).00. F¡j1(9~bIØ(lI!1fi¡v~;j¡~I~) '.
. Aiirlliål..... '. NOvember: . : N6veriibeC . :.Dollars: $1':' 1"""""1(%):
Property Taxes $ 6,976,393 $ 7,200,394 $ 7,195,266 $ 7,195,266 $ 0.0%
Sales Tax $ 9,343,500 $ 9,905,347 $ 9,045,352 $ 9,466,978 421,626 4.7'Æ
HoteVMotel Lodging Tax $ 110,603 $ 90,000 $ 83,024 $ 127,175 44,151 53.2%
Criminal Justice Sales Tax $ 1,487,111 $ 1,589,767 $ 1,445,027 $ 1,530,411 85,384 5.9%
Intergovernmental $ 3,174,808 $ 3,085,827 $ 2,788,878 $ 3,497,869 708,991 25.4%
Real Estate Ex,"se Tax $ 1,996,568 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,742,024 $ 1,829,380 87,357 5.0%
Gambling Taxes $ 1,449,605 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,323,914 $ 1,981,036 657,122 49.6%
Utility Taxes $ 5,079,701 $ 6,016,400 $ 5,507,446 $ 5,578,161 70,715 1.3%
Court Revenue $ 797,958 $ 865,784 $ 799,650 $ 932,711 133,061 16.6%
Bulldin9 Pennits/Fees-CD $ 1,004,852 $ 1,099,804 $ 1,027,515 $ 984,404 (43,111) -4.2%
Expedited Review Fees-CD $ 119,167 $ $ - $ 100,432 100,432 nJa
ROW Pennits/Fees-PW $ 250,885 $ 259,583 $ 234,663 $ 325,037 90,374 38.5'Æ
Expedited Review Fees-PW $ 40,211 $ $ $ 22,068 22,068 nJa
Licenses $ 85,250 $ 174,809 $ 70,442 $ 70,442 0.0%
Franc~ise Fees $ 496,418 $ 488,902 $ 468,902 $ 581,397 112,495 24.0%
Recreation Fees $ 495,490 $ 611,896 $ 556,848 $ 547,718 (9,130) -1.6%
Dumas Bay Centre $ 460,025 $ 488,300 $ 458,256 $ 547,003 88,747 19.4%
Knutzen Family Theatre $ 68,686 $ 65,475 $ 56,368 $ 75,113 18,745 33.3%
Interest Eamings $ 924,074 $ 841,319 $ 857,998 $ 857,998 - 0.0%
IMmin I Cash Management Fees $ 156,337 $ 476,306 $ 441,920 $ 441,920 0.0%
SWM Fees $ 3,009,893 $ 3,165,155 $ 2,915,866 $ 2,915,866 O.O'Æ
Refuse Collection Fees $ 120,358 $ 153,013 $ 141,816 $ 137,160 (4,656) -3.3'Æ
Police Services $ 720,535 $ 423,516 $ 336,530 $ 700,896 364,366 108.3%
Other $ 60,834 $ 58,599 $ 68,566 $ 68,566 0.0%
Liblotal: Oòei-atiniJ: Revenues" 38,429;262. .40;390;196:: : 37"566,212' . '40515008' . 2948.737' '7;8'1.
Interfund Transfers - In 0.0%
Other Financino Sources 7,230,373 6,490,930 5,421,849 5,421,849 - 0.0%
otal Re\Ìenues & Oiher SòUrces. $ '46,659;635 $ '.46,8810126 .$.. . 42,968,121- $ 046936;857' 'os::.' 0 2:948,.731 6;9'1.
-I
I
!
i
I
COMPARISON OF 2001 OPERATING REVENUES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL
43000000
3BOOOOOO
Totol2001 Budgeted Revenue. $40,390,196
BOOOOOO
33000000
2BOOOOOO
23000000
'BOOOOOO
'3000000
3000000
-2000000
;2.
Citv of Federal Wav
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
Property tax
Property tax revenue collected through November total $7,195,266, which includes second half property taxes. Actual taxes
received in November total $2,065,914, which is $1,025,838 or 98% higher than October's receipt. The large increase is due to
second half property tax payments received in November. The first half payment was received in April/May.
Real Estate Excise Tax
Year-to-date Real Estate Excise tax revenue total $1,829,380, which is $87,357 or 5.0% above budget projections of $],742,024.
The current months' receipt of$155,743 is also above the montWy estimate of$137,653 by $18,090 or 13.1%. There were a total
of217 real estate transactions of which 74 were tax exempt and 8 were mobile home sales. November transactions consist mainly
of a few major residential sales.
$2,000,000
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX ACTIVITY
Through November 2001
. ..1,'" 'Yo:. .;-
~."'~:.'-i:' 'Yo§>"'4'
7èó1i.+.~.. !\.' ~'
~""
.:1'1, "",,~
.,'"
",""
íJl
;!!
!
¡ Jf
"
¿
i
1;-
-r
Ò
~
$1,000,000
$.
"
~
/Il
;!!
3
Citv of Federal Way
November 2001 Monthly Financial RetJort
Sales Tax
Sales tax received through November of $9,466,978 is $421,626 or 4.7% above the year-to-date budget of $9,045,352. On a year-
to-date basis, November 2001 Sales tax revenue is $123,478 or I % higher than November 2000 revenue of $9,343,500. Sales tax
received in the month of November total $859,019, which is $13,446 or 1.6% above the adopted budget estimate of $844,572. A
total of$835,083 in sales taxes was received in the month of December.
"y
05'
37.737
64,333 5.9%
78,007 10.4%
34,868 5.0%
114,127 14.0%
(92,123) -11.7%
38,119 5.0%
48,005 5.8%
11,102 1.2%
73,404 9.0%
13,448
Februa<y
Ma"'"
.,
May
Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 63.4% of all sales tax collections. However,
on a year-to-date basis, November 2001 retail sales tax collections are $62,049 or .01% lower than November 2000. The decline
would have been steeper ifnot for the monthly internal audit which resulted in recovery of over $76,000 on a year-to-date basis.
Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 10.9% of sales tax collections is $9,274 or .09% above year 2000
activity. This continues to be a relatively high percentage of tax collection when compared to historical trend. We anticipate tax
from construction to slow substantially in the later part of December, and into the next 9 to 18 months as indicated by the number
of building permit applications received for new construction.
Service industries accounts for 11.1 % of the total sales tax collections In the month of November. Service sales tax is up from the
prior month by $107,004 or 11.3% On a year-to-date basis, service sales tax is up $162,807 or 16.5% from the year 2000.
Hotels/motels, personal services and amusement/recreation accounts for most of the increase.
4-
Citv of Federal Way
November 20.0.1 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Government activity through November total $138,052, which is an increase of$8,799 or 6.4% from the same period last year.
--
Sales Tax Activity by Area
356,830
18.!JO/o
4.9%
88,167
1.5%
1.2%
107,076
na
1.4%
36,420
-1.2%
0.5%
na
1.7%
40,075'
10.(1'10
0.5%
6.1%
16.6%
'+Tf925;!
-1.[1)6
11.6%
+Tf\34'l,0N,
-1.3%
4.3%
" ilii82;651
4.7%
1.(1'/0
,;ii120;51
-6.[1)6
1.5%
'42,794
6.!JO1o
0.5%
na
-14.1%
'3.8"A
na
-D..5% -5[1)6
43,966 -10.3'1
na na
-D..5% -11.5%
--'30,831 7.O'A
na na
0.3% 5.6%
799 3.2"A
32% na na
2(1'/0 0.(1'10 1.9%
118,337 24,155 25.6"A
25.6% na na
1.2% 0.2% 24.(1'10
The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates over ]3.8% of the City's sales tax experienced a decline of$195,852
or 13.0% when compared to the year 2000. The decline is due in part to decreased construction activity, and the other is a result of
continuous competition from Wal-Mart, which began its operation In March of 2000. Sales tax has decreased slightly from the
prior month by $728 or .01%, with decreases in such areas as the retaiVgeneral merchandise and retail apparel accessories.
However, there were slight increases in such areas as retail building materials and wholesale durable goods from the prior month.
SeaTac Mall is showing a decrease of $36,389 or 3.8% when compared to the year 2000 activity. Sales tax has also slightly
decreased from the prior month by $471 or .01%, with decreases in such areas as retail apparel accessories. retail eating and
drinking, and retail furniture.
Major Auto Sales have through November collected $381,520, which is S43,966 or 10.3% below the same period in 2000. This is
due to higher car sales generated 111 2000 as a result of the passing of Initiative 695. Sales tax has also decreased slightly from the
s
Citvo(Federal Wav
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
prior month by $1,392 or .02%, indicating a decrease in auto sales.
South 312'h to South 316'h Block sales tax activity is $30,831 or 7.0% above the same period in 2000. However, November sales
tax collection is $4,645 or 10.1% below the amount collected in October. Significant decreases could be seen in such areas as
retaiVgeneral merchandise, retail automotive gas and wholesale durable goods.
Hotels & Motels sales tax collected through November total $118,337, which is a $24,155 or 25.6% increase over the same
period in 2000. Revenue has gradually increased, with the largest increase being between the years 1999 and 2000. The increase
was a result of new hotel additions in Federal Way in the year 2000. However, there continues to be a decrease in HotellMotel
Lodging Tax activities, due to the September II th incident. Due to further fear of travel, hoteVmotel sales tax fell by $2,538 or
22.8% from the prior month's collection of$II,141.
SALES TAX BY AREA
YTD through November, 2001
Olh"
65.4%
S"T" M",
'.e%
p"moo Ceo",
2.0%
M,jo, A""O'
4.0%
S 348th
138%
S 3121h 10 S
316th
Gambling Tax
Year-to-date gambling tax collection is $657,122 or 49.6% above the estimated budget of $1,323,914. On a year-to-date basis,
November 2001 tax collection is $424,678 or 34.4% above the same period in 2000. November's collection is $39,214 or 30.8%
above the monthly budget estimate of$I27,332. The year-to-date increase is due in part to the collection of $64,663 in delinquent
taxes from one establishment. In addition, another establishment reopened its card room activity, which it had ceased operating
between the periods of July 1999 and May 2000. Three establishments were delinquent in filing their October 2001 returns,
however, we expect to receive these payments in Decembet.
$193,344
178,6~
183,941
238,928
168,101
185,526
188,82!j
150,734 .
168,691
157,781
168,546
$1,981;036
'$;1,981,036
$77,363
- 64,746
72,058
106,011
42,065
60,784
- 68,046
43,725
- 55,186
27,922
- - 39,214
$65T:1'22
$657,1~L
66.7%
56.9%
64.4%
79.8%
33.4%
48.7%
56.3%
40.9%
48.6%
21.5%
30.8%
b
Citv or Federal Way
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
Cardrooms
Table reflects 9ambHn9 ac';,ily IhroU9h Oclober on a cash b"is.
HoteVMotel Lodging Tax
Hotel/motel lodging tax collected through November total $127,175, which is $44,151 or 49.1% above the estimated budget of
$83,024. The amount collected represents activity from November 2000 to September 200]. The month-to-month budget is
somewhat unreliable as only a year of history is available.
H(}tEuMoTEL LODGING rAX RE\ÆH.JES
1999 - 2001
1999 2tIOO 2001 2fXJ1 Budget
Month AK;Wa/ AK;Wa/ Budget . Al:fuaI S lIIoiance S Variance
Janua<y $ $ 7,169 $ 7,168 $ 10,145 $ 2,977 41.5"
Fetrua<y 6,255 6,255 10,977 4,722 75.5%
Maæh 6,204 6,204 11,239 5,035 81.2%
April 7,553 7,553 11,226 3,673 48.6%
May 10,383 7,383 13,693 6,310 85.5%
Jure 4,541 7,351 7,383 10,978 3,595 48.7%
July 5,401 8,584 6,300 10,663 4,357 69.1%
Augusl 5,689 12,100 7,894 9,933 2,039 25.8'"
Se¡iember 8,538 15,569 8,894 16,071 7,177 &1"
October 7,613 15,967 9,094 12,644 3,550 39 (fl.
~ 8,971 13,463 8.800 9,607 717 -~
~ 6,428 11,904 6,976 0 (fl.
YT1) Oct T- 40,753 110,603 83,024 127,175 44,151 53.2%
Total $ 47,181 $ 122.507 $ 90,000 $ 127,175 $ 44,151 49.1%
Utility Tax
Utility tax received through November total $5,578,161 which is $70,715 or 1.3% above the estimated budget of $5,507,446,
Compared to 2000, year-to-date November 2001 utility tax receipt is higher by $498,460 or 9.8%. Gas taxes exceed the estimated
budget of $679,291 by $213,633 or 31.4% due mainly to two large rate increases implemented in the past 18 months. Cellular
taxes also exceed the estimated budget of $719,019 by $196,231 or 27.3%, a growth n-end consistent with prior years. Conn-ary to
expectations, the electrical utility tax is $74,093 or 4% below the 2000 collections. This was primarily due to the conservation
efforts initiated during the energy crisis.
7
Citv of Federal Waf
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Phone
Storm Drainage
C,;lula,
Pagers
1,747,356
892,924
331,751
539,000
1,004,948
137,828
915,250
9,104
:f:li;~
31.<
-6.;
4.1
-11.(
-10.~
27.,
-61./
559,223 $ 12,473
580,723 11,817
595,183 47,995 8.8%
617,404 38,928 6.7%
544,080 15,818 3.0%
466,013 15,787 3.5%
435,775 (20,637) -4.5%
416,374 (5,324) -1.3'Æ
428,486 (19,709) -4.4%
468,209 (33,082) -6.6%
466,692 6,650 1.4'Æ
Garbage
5.9%
Cell" la'
16.4%
Gas
16.0%
~
Ow of Federal Wav
November 1001 Montlzlv Financial Reoort
State Shared Revenue
State shared revenue collected through November total $5,028,281 and exceeds the estimated budget of$4, 179,234 by $849,047 or
20.3%. The majority of the variance was due in part to a receipt of $470,179 in July of 2001 for local government financial
assistance. In addition, there were significant increases in local criminal justice tax, fuel tax and vehicle license fees ÍÌom the prior
month.
'1>ptær1snu1Hy¡;m,,¡mms(l'W- Jnj irtreaDl;\t¡mlfu\¡<
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$-
STATE-SHARED REVENUES
1996-2001
av" LiO F."
.F", T"
CC,'m,,"
J,"",
CE".Ii"Ii"
.","°'
<0
'"
'"
....
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
0>
0>
0>
0
0
0
'"
~
0
0
'"
aMVET
~
Citv of Federal War
November 2001 Montlllv Financial Reoort
Court Reveuue
Court revenue is $17,262 or 2.3% above year-to-date budget projections of $780,880 from fines and forfeitures. Total court
revenue collected through November amounts to $932,711, which is $133,061 or 16.6% above the year-to-dale budget of
$799,650, and is also above last year's activity by $62,970 or 7.2%. This is primarily due to the inclusion of adult probation
services (B1, Inc.), and Traffic School Admin Fees. The base line court revenue is $43.852 or 5.3% below 2000 collections,
primarily due to the reduction in traffic and non-parking citations, and criminal costs. our and other misdemeanors collected
through November total $145,243, which is $50,960 or 54.1 % above the year-to-date budget of $94,283. Criminal costs collected
year-to-date total $72,396, which is $24,642 or 51.6% above the estimated budget of $47,754. Parking infractions actual of
$56,031 is above the year-Io-date budget of $26,529 by $29,502 or $111.2%. Traffic and Non-Parking are below the year-to-date
budget of$509,289 by $60,310 or 11.8%, but are offset by Traffic School revenue total 0[$94,556.
$36.495 $60.696
F,bro.", 37,71J3 66,750
.."h 46,373 04,382
Ap," 49,917 57,631
.. 51,288 52,203 73,420
J,,", 42,515 50,138 04,260 73,046
JII~ 46,166 52,491 60,666 71,957
"""'" 88,695 65,123 61,751 97,179
S'pt~bw 36,993 66,626 72,313 71,311
O<tob" 41,043 66,176 74,540 60,635
N...m"', 30,341 45,710 66,501 71,763
C".mbw 29,904 67,590 55,693 65,100
""-Cmn",~"'""",".~~" T.""""""M""'Fæ"""",."""'"eo""C"'"""""
ill
COURT REVENUE
YTD Through November
fIIiIB
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
~
-'!'
¡ -'!'ó,'¡> #./' &'('-
ToIaÌ
'O_=,-~,",," w..._"""Û>,,~
DTraffic
School Adm
Fee
.Probatlon
Seevlces
'GCourt
I Rellenue
.--
<31
, 2.J'Y,
"-
4,7"
.,16.6""
10
Ci/¡l of Federal Wav
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
Building Permits and Plan Check Fees
Building pemrit revenues collected through November total $984,404, which is below the budget estimate by $43,113 or 4.2%.
This does not include a year-to-date pass through revenue of $1 00,432 for expedited and environmental review. Revenue collected
for expedited review is not budgeted nor are the offsetting expenses. Building pemrits, which include mechanical, plumbing and
clear/grade pemrits total $451,064 through the end of November, which is below the adopted budget of $525,706 by $74,642 or
14.2%. Electrical pennits total $89,119, which is below the adopted budget by $35,959 or 28.7%. Plan check fees collected
through November total $340,198, which is $49,488 or 28.2% above the adopted budget of$290,710. Significant building pemrits
during the month of November include 20 commercial alterations with a total valuation of $1,311,800; and 11 residential
alterations with an $111,232 combined valuation.
Ee,934 $ 54,814 $ 77,ffi1 $ 68,683 $ 68,358 $ 113,300 $ 45,042
81,164 33,œB 95,739 64,619 78,008 67,174 $ (11,814)
95,791 45,879 144,848 101,51.15 1œ,4æ 00,:115 $ (3,001)
68,250 62.ffi3 68,401 100,334 99,126 91,446 $ (7,600)
62.379 60,500 161,1(5 86,274 94,464 69,005 $ (2S,m)
51,em 1Œ,775 165,674 107,297 113,332 100,012 $ (13,:>Ð)
5O,cm 143,œJ 115,233 101,765 112.049 76,038 $ (;1;,011) -32.10/,
ffi,711 129,553 134,783 63,482 101,874 99,765 $ (5,100) -4.9"Æ
61,Œ3 82.002 00,216 112.400 92,Z38 162.977 $ 70,739 76.7"Æ
47,776 107,654 52.3:5 119,tœ 86,183 51,:ID $ (34,800) -40.5"Æ
32.185 68,188 87,017 72,001 75,447 53,826 $ (21,621) -2ft7"Æ
47,978 52.975 68,100 72,125 72,289 O.a'Æ
$ 9!3,117 $ 1,2111.39Ó $ 1,0!!I,~.$;if,iI2i;515 $ !1114,4)4 $ .(43,11~ ~ <,-4,.2',
$j'~$ 9!!iI,(QI $ 1,288,040 $;' ..t~$1,_$ -,$ . (.g,113
1,855,tœ 1,933,057 2.0J1,00J 2,004,658 2.193,728 2,193,728 ra
39.61 :i)a'Æ 63,2"Æ 52.40/, 5O.1'Æ 44.9"Æ ra
35,7" 37.8"Æ ;I;.9"Æ :}l9"!. 41.4'Æ ra
1\
City of Federal Way
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Revort
The table below presents a synopsis of building pennit activity as of November 30. 200 I for new construction between 1999 and
2001:
Building Division - Permit Activity
YTD Through November, 2001
1999 2000 2001
",TvpóofPer",it Pr,"t Valuól$1 prmt. VatÍJó($) ,Pr",¡ Viliu,,($!
New Residential (Platted) 90 $ 4,950,879 55 $ 9,022,729 26 $ 3,652,929
New Commercial 15 24,732,949 20 25,807,541 20 34,167,158
New Multi-Family Units 6 2,628,427 12 3,819,904 6 1,789,927
New Public 0 0 0 0 0 0
.SubtOIaI'N,;""Corist<uctiori.:. ',11,1: $,: 32,31Ù55 , at $ ': j8;650,174 '52": $ '3~,610;014
Manufactured Homes 0 0 0
Residential Alterations 90 1,038,109 123 2,277,927 134 3,665,850
Commercial Alterations 190 12,760,799 216 12,157,928 238 18,824,018
Plumbing Only 23 0 60 0 77 0
Mechanical Only 405 4,572,032 347 1,484,539 331 1,672,389
Mise, Building Permits 0 0 0 0 0
: :Subtotal':Alt...tions : 708 $ 18,370,1140:' ':746"' : '$:: '15;$20:394:' :780: : $ 24.162,257
Electrical Permits 1280 0 1052 0 927 0
: Tot.' BIJildi"g l'ei'liHt.: ,:0: 819 $ :50;683.195,' ,8aZ '$', ':5{:570,568 832 : '$: ",63,772;27f
Non-Building Permits:
Sign Permits 278 24,145 340 1,026,530 253 505,146
,:T"tål$: ' 278: $,: ,'24;145: 340,: $' "M2fii5aQ 253 ..$:' &0$;1~
ROW Permits and Fees
Overall Public Works pennits and fees collected through November total $325,037, which is $90,374 or 38.5% above the year-to-
date budget of $234,663, A year-to-date pass-through revenue of $22,068 for expedited review is not included in the pennits and
fees, Plan review fees collected total $76,122, which is $66,918 or 41.6% below the budget estimate of $143,030 for the current
period,
July
August
September
October
12-
Citv of Federal Wav
P.,mUs/Plen
Th'DUgh
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
Police Services Revenue
Police Services Revenue collected through November total $700,896. This amount includes Traffic School revenue of $94,556
and interest earnings of $20,755. Police Security services of $354,449 include payments from the Federal Way School District for
semi-annual billing for school resources officer at Decatur, Federal Way and Truman High Schools. Also included is $92,411 of
state seizure revenue. which is designated for that specific program. The remaining $138,725 balance is made up of mise en an eo us
revenue such as, weapon pennits, police report copies, photographs, fingerprinting, and false alanns. $298,946 has been received
in grant revenues this year, but is included in other financing sources. Traffic School and the Explorer program are currently not
budgeted revenues, however these adjustments will be made during the carry forward budget adjustment.
-: $ -: $ -: $ 5.133 $ 6,022 $ 3,300
12.184: 10,125: 5,932: 4,804 7,943 8,840
75: 1œ; 00; 53 00
8,Œ/: 9,374: 10.122: 10,336 11,318 11,179
26: 153: 004: 547 519 438
3.225: 3.Z37: 3,023: 3,281 3,425 3.623
37,825 88,270 149,513 349,œJ 267,048 354,449
124,488 51,011 92.411
85,396
00,975 94,556
20,910 20,755
13,945 8,œ.; 42.876
æ,w 12.411 9,718
æ,5OO 46,200 35,560
14,100 9,500 Z3,O43
481,263 200,476 288.948
- 190 $
Pdiœ & _ve Uœrßes
O:rceaIaJ Pistd License
¡en Rream License
Pdiœ Roxrt QØes
Ftdo¡"ap1s
Rrgerpints
Pdiœ Sea.rity
Slate Sei2I.res
- Sei2I.res
Jaffic Scrod & T raflic Safely Qæt
1- Earnings
False Þmrs
are- Msœll<>'1OOJS
[e¡ MJires Caltrad
[):œticn; & CmlriWims
Q:Batirg T ræsfer I o-Galts
cœs & UE8G G"ants
~,t: ~ Total ~~::
13
Ci 0 Federal Wa
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES
November 2001 Monthl Financial Re orl
General governmental expenditures through November total $33,878,883 or 84% of the annual operating budget of $40,378,211.
Operating expenditures are below year-to-date budget of $36,549, 118 by $2,670,235 or 7.3%. When compared to the year 2000,
operating expenditures are up $2,971,924 or 9.6%.
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT
Period Ending November 30, 2001
"~1~\iíSðdBodt,ACtuais '
Through Through
'N()vembø~. . NOvember, .
City Coundl 185,257 223,232 $ 207,225 $ 197,525
City Manager $ 366,176 $ 698,971 $ 631,524 $ 600,606
MunidpalCourt-Operations $ 696,704 $ 966,958 $ 931,349 $ 963,176
Management Services $ 1,387,633 $ 1,733,215 $ 1,536,056 $ 1,452,087
Civil/Criminal Legal Services $ 1,133,179 $ 1,266,589 $ 1,156,275 $ 1,051,903
Camm. Development Selvices $ 2,589,938 $ 3,582,627 $ 3,285,075 $ 2,713,020
Police Services $ 11,652,104 $ 13,483,627 $ 11,781,659 $ 11,888,320
Jail Services $ 1,486,660 $ 1,638,938 $ 1,345,187 $ 1,138,493
Parks and Recreation $ 2,741,994 $ 3,259,444 $ 2,992.783 $ 2,766,082
Public Works $ 2,711,653 $ 3,653,771 $ 3,239,412 $ 2,793,287
CityCNerlayProgram $ 1,389,940 $ 2,005,169 $ 1,981,174 $ 1,345,945
Snow & Ice Removal $ 8,441 $ - $ - $
Solid Waste $ 271,629 $ 405,777 $ 366,673 $ 290,822
HoteVMotei Lodging Tax $ 66,465 $ 107,702 $ 98,727 $ 25,778
Surface Water Management $ 1,321,866 $ 2,184,014 $ 1,932,284 $ 1,461,684
Debt Service $ 2,253,288 $ 4,528,541 $ 4,508,353 $ 4,508,353
Dumas Bay Centre $ 481,971 $ 474,587 $ 416,145 $ 503,986
Knutzen Famil Theatre $ 161,881 $ 165,048 $ 139,218 $ 137,815
$ub!0tiII ,in. ex " ,3().9P6;~~ '<,40;;!7R;2H$,54$,H8' ,33,871!,ß83 ,
Other Finandn Uses' 11,425,326 11,397,276 9,435,436 9,435,436
Jolale;,' ,liditq$&QtI1er~ $<42~;Z85$51;775.487 $45,98'1;554.<$<43;314,319,$,'
rUther Hnaoong Uses are tJ-ose actl~ties considered one time In rature,
COMPARISON OF 2001 OPERATING EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL
Total 2001 Budgeted Expenditures $40,378,211
$40.000.000
$35,000,000
$30.000,000
$25.000,000
$20.000.000
$15,000.000
$10,000.000
$5.000,000
$-
Jan
Feb
Mar
Ap,
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
------
, " Variance.,' ,",
Favorabie ùrlfaliØråblÈi) , ,
, ' D61tðl'$($). 'ÞÐrci!IÌt(%»
$ 9,701 4.70/.
30,918 4.90/.
(51,828) -5.60/.
83,969 5.50/.
104,371 9.00/.
572,055 17.40/.
(106,661) -0.90/.
206,694 15.40/.
206,701 6.90/.
446,125 13.80/.
635,228 32.10/.
rJ
20.70/.
rJ
24.40/.
rJ
-21.10/.
1.00/.
. .7.3ÐÆ
rJ
< 5.SO/~
75,850
72,949
470,600
(87,842)
1,403
2;67Q,235 '
'2,67Q.235 , ,<
Nov
Dee
14-
Citv of Federal Wav
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
City Council
Variance Analvsis:
City Council expenditures total $] 97,525, which is below the budgetary estimate of $207,225 by $9,701 or 4.7%. The saving is
due to Puget Sound Regional Council dues not being paid as of November 30th.
Municipal Court
Variance Analvsis:
Municipal Court Operations expenditures total $983,176, which is above the budgetary estimate of $931 ,349 by $51,828 or 5.6%.
Professional services include approximately $89,329 for the B] contract for adult probationary services through the month of
November, but this has offsetting revenues. The mid-biennium budget adjustment totaling $122K ($90K probations services, $4K
juror fees and $28K security officers salary) will offset the unfavorable variance in December's report.
City Manager:
Variance Analvsis:
Activity through November total $600,606 and is below the budget estimate of $63],524 by $30,918 or 4.9%. The variance is
primarily due to salary savings in earlier part of the year, and the Management Intern position that was finally filled in September.
CiviVCriminal Legal
Variance Analvsis:
Activity through November total $1,051,903 and is below the budget estimate of$I,156,275 by $]04,371 or 9.0%. Savings can be
found in Civil Lega] Services salary and benefits, outside legal counsel/litigation specialist cost (have expended $39K or 44.3% of
$88K annual budget), and public defense attorney services (have expended $]90 or 81.7% of its $233K annual budget).
Management Services
Variance Analvsis:
Activity through November total $1,452,087, which is $83,969 or 5.5% below the year-to-date budget estimate of $],536,056.
Although Human Resources division has expended its budget for job announcements, savings can be found primarily in one-time
fund internal service charges for the Kronos Timekeeping System, Docwnent Imaging System, and the Eden Financial System
upgrade.
Community Development
Variance Analvsis:
Through November, CD is below their year-to-date budget estimate of $3,285,075 by $572,055 or 17.4%. The savings are
primarily due to unfilled positions in Human Services during the earliet part of the year. In addition, one-time funded programs
such as the planned action SEPA contracted services, PAA planning, compensation plan update, and code amendments have not
been fully expended on a year-to-date basis.
Parks and Recreation
Variance Analvsis:
Parks Operations expenditures through November total $2,786,082, which is $206,701 or 6.9% below year-to-date budget estimate
of $2,992,783. Savings can be found in Park Maintenance (76.8% expended year-to-date), and in various one-time funded
programs such as tree replacement and e-commerce recreation class registration that have not been spent to date, but we anticipate
some increased activity by year-end.
Dumas Bav Centre: Operating expenditures through November total $503,986, which exceeds the year-to-date budget estimate of
$416,145 by $87,842 or 21.1%. This is primarily due to an increase in professional services, specifically catering, custodia] and
cleaning charges, as well as electrical charges. The increase in expenditmes is offset by an $88,747 or 19.4% favorable revenue
variance.
Knutzen Fami]v Theatre: Operatiug expenditures through November total $137,8]5, which is 83% of the total year adopted
budget of$165,048. Total expenditures are also below year-to-date budget estimate of $139,313 by $1.403 or 1%. Year-to-date
revenue of $75,311 exceeds the budget estimate of $56,368 by $18,745 or 33.3%. The favorable revenue variance willlike]y be
offset by expected increased expenditures in the later part of the year.
IS
Citv of Federal Way
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report
The table below summarizes recreation and cultural services and Dumas Bay Centre activity, and their related recovery rates:
Community Center
Senior Services
Special Populations
Youth Commission
Adult Athletics
Youth Athletics
Aquatics
Celebration Park
Arts & Special Events
Community Recreation -
White & Blue
88.1%
97.2%
97.0%
82.9%
138.2%
93.0%
143.3%
96.1%
132.2%
73.7%
118.7%
99.7%
83.7%
95.6%
,TOJfI<!>.RI~¡,utATION
Dumas Bay Centre
Knutzen Famil Theatre
! TOTAL DUMAS BAY CENTRa $
Arts Commission
1
""eo", do Got ""ode "'0" oc op"",o, 1""le" ',p,"dilo'.' do 001 ""ode ""'",1 eqo'~ 1""le" oc othe, 'oto"ood ",oIObo"'"
33.0%
13.8%
30.3%
27.8%
183.0%
71.7%
9.8%
21.3%
52.7%
104.3%
62.4%
63.7%
nla
37.5%
14.0%
37.4%
nla
130.8%
101.3%
0.6%
12.3%
26.7%
125.6%
32.4%
58.3%
nla
45.2%
108.5%
54.5%
96.9%1
nla
,~--
Recreation and Cultural Services:
Total revenue of $558,487 is $53,409 or 8.7% below the year-to-date budget of $611,896. Direct program expenditure total of
$957,624 is 99.7% of the $960,761 annual budget. Recreation services have recovered 58.3% of direct program costs year-to-date.
When total administrative expenditure of$278,602 is included, the total recovery ratio is 45.2%.
Dumas Bav Centre:
Operating revenue total $547,003, which is $58,703 or 12% above year-to-date budget estimate of$488.300. However, operating
expenditure total of $503,986 is $29,399 or 6.2% above year-to-date budget estimate of $474,587. The Dumas Bay Centre has
recovered 108.5% of its' total operating costs.
Knutzen Familv Theatre:
Operating revenue through November total $75,113, which is $9,638 or 14.7% above year-to-date budget estimate of $65,475.
Total operating expenditure of $137,815 is $27,233 or 16.5% below year-to-date budget estimate of $165,048. The Knutzen
Family Theatre has also recovered 54.5% of its' total operating costs.
Public Works
Variance Analvsis
Pub/ic Works Operations: Expenditures are below November year-to-date budget estimate of$3,239.412 by $446,125 or 13.8%.
Public works have also expended $2,793,287 or 76.4% of its $3,653,771 annual appropriation. Savings can be found in one-time
funded programs (such as transportation model update and tree replacement), which are 46.7% expended year-to-date. Some
contracted services payments have also not yet been made.
Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are below year-to-date budget projections of $366.673 by $75,850 or 20.7%.
Savings could be seen in the special recycling and composting bins events that took place in September and Gctobet of this year.
Surface Water Managcmem Operations: Expenditures are below November year-to-date budget projections of $1,932,284 by
$470,600 or 24.4%. Savings are due primarily to unfilled budgeted positIons within the division. and the NPDES/ESA one-time
funded program.
Ib
Citl' of Federal Wal'
November 2001 Monthlv Fiaaacitri Revort
Public Safety <~ Jail Services
Variance Aualvsis:
Police Services have expended $11,888,302 thtOugh November, which exceeds the year-to-date budget ptOjection of$11,781,659
by$106,6610r.09%.
The table below represents police operating revenue collected through November 200 I.
.¡$ -:$ -¡$
_'.~.18'--:-___-.!O,125:. 5.~32_:
Police Report CoP'"s- - _8!~;~: -_.. ._--",~:: 10,~~L- _'0,".3_6.
""otog,aphs 26¡ 1531 -904, 547
",nge,p,:nts. - . -------.-.---.--- -- 3,22~j 3,237 ¡ ---_3.0231~.... .:!,2!J.
PoI~e Secu"ty 37,825 88,270 I 149.513 349,080
~~:i;~:le~i~~;is-- ~---i-- 146,113] ----20,28~ [ -- ~1':fs~~~_:~::::
Teaff,e School & Traffic Safety G'ant , 3.725 I 19,514 56,008 I 80.975
~te';~t8,-;-~¡~gS I 3,539 I 12,569 20,818 20,910
~~~~~~~;t;~-----~]~-=__~~=I--- ,~- =--=~~t_~=~:!~~
Donations & Cont,ibutions ,700i 616 2,899 14,180
~.u !"tà e ~ 21 5 64
Ope,ating T'ansf., h-Gran!s
COPS & LLffiG Grants
53
_-",318
519
----2~ --
___2~~8-
51.011
3,399
8,840
60
.'.','.7!)
438
.._-'~2"--
_35.4,4.49
_¿¡2~'--
8,066
12,411
46,200
9,500
94,556
20,755
-----~~~
9.718
---"'~<J.
23,043
481,26; i
841,192
~.!l ,. 2.
563,910
209,476
298,946
~11
n
6 ,9
Iii
Jail Services:
Jail services are below the 10-month budget estimate of $1,345,187 by $206,694 or 15.4%. The expended total of $1,138,493
includes jail services paid through the month of September. The chart below reflects 10 months of jail costs and maintenance, as
of the end of November.
Jail Costs vs Maintenance Days
Through November 2001
$1,400,000
In
;;
0
(J
$800,000
1,910
$1,117,710
20,000
18,000
16,000
14,000 "
12,000 ¡¡
10,000 ¡¡
8,000 .~
6,000 :E
4,000
2,000
.'-".---
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
~
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$.
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
~Expend¡tures
-+-Cases
\1
Citv of Federal Way
November 1001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
Operating Expenditures By Category
The chart below shows operating expenditures and financing uses through November 30,2001 by category or object code:
050 City Manager Contingency Fund 784,541 1.5% 0.0%
100 Personnel Services 16,396,314 14,547,314 31.7% 88.7%
200 Benefits 3.423,777 3,035,843 6.6% 88.7%
300 Supplies 1,141,426 691,932 2.2% 60.6%
400 Other Services and Charges 5,167,436 3,701,134 10.0% 71.6%
500 Inter90vernmental ServiceslTaxes 3,327,860 2,4S7,828 6.4% 74.8%
552 'nterfund Contributions 10,137,539 9,031,495 19.6% 89.1%
561 Residual Equity Transfers 460,951 201,753 0.9% 43.8%
600 Capital Outlays 2,016,068 1,236,227 3.9% 61.3%
700 Debt Service - Principal 3,094,362 2,931,471 6.0% 94.7%
800 Debt Service - Interest 1,641,331 1,781,911 3.2% 108.6%
900 Interfund Svc Pa ments 4,183,882 3,667.411 8.1% 87.7%
Totat 0 eratin Ex endlture. t U.e. 51,775,487 43,314,319 99.8% 83.7%
Personnel services and benefits, which comprises 32% of the operating budget, is 88.8% expended. Included in this number are
salaries and wages, temporary help, seasonal help, overtime pay, overtime-private security and tennination pay.
Other services and charges have expended only 71.6% of its $5,167,436 annual budget, with savings in City Manager, Law, Parks,
Public Works, SWM, and Public Safety.
Capital outlays, which includes $1.8 million for the arterial streets overlay project, is 62% expended.
Interfund Contributions, which is 19,6% of total operating budget has been 89.1% expended year-to-date.
Internal service payments are currently at 87.7%, which represents II months of maintenance and operations expenses.
,g
Citv of Federal Wav
FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY:
.: .
.. ... : ".~.
!>/¥Ierilt/S~tt="nd:
Debt SeMce F,",d:( t)
Special Revenue:
Arterial Street
UtilityTax (1)
Solid Waste & Recycling
Special Study (Gov. TV)
Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax
2% lor the Arts
CDBG
Paths & Trails
Strategic/Airport Reserve
$t!llIølilt$~~tRtiVet1Í1!!t"Jiil(t$.:.
Capitat Project:
Public Safety Facility
Downtown Revitalization
Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds
Celebration Park
Park Improvements
Surface Water Management
Transportation
S¡¡bløWÞ¡¡ÞiW F'ri¡¡~I'" .
Enterprise Funds:
Surface Water Management
Dumas Bay Centre Operations
Dumas Bay Centre Capital
Knutzen Family Theatre Capital
Knutzen Family Theatre Operations
Subtotal Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds: (2)
Risk Management
Inlonnetion Systems
Mail & Duplication
Fleet & Equipment
Buildings & Furnishings
Subtotal Internal Service Funds
Total All Funds
November 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort
FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY
.aøgjnrnt1gF~t1d . ~ Ii. ~ent1~ .E::UZd.
eal~ni;¡,,¡t111iot . Inl(O~tj . . 11/30101...
$:.
~,7~0,<145 $
2$;$1$;49$. $
5;364;~$2
1,569,379
5,706,592
221,254
25,143
131,105
5,000
103,047
9,647
62,694
1;1l~;~3
280,938
59,268
870
5,507
593,396
2,120,797
5,773,011
: .~;1133;7~~
3,189,626
548,012
321.454
1,375
171,783
4,232,250
2,793,861
1.463,555
175,700
947,176
678,301
6,058,594
61,841,840 $
26,546,378 $
4,759,215
1,345,945
4,448,783
290,822
11,866
25,778
107,594
2,060,718
8,291,507
69,002
11,079
964,144
314,231
5,730,140
7,088,596 .
3,194,878
503,986
137,815
3,836,679
463,702
1,123,980
114.453
984,004
250,537
2,916,675
53,439,051 $
2;971;71$: .$
6tIM37.
223,434
1,257,809
(69,568)
13,277
105,327
5,000
(4,547)
9,647
(1,998,024)
(4$7;$.#) .:
280,938
(9,734)
870
(5,572)
(370,748)
1,806,568
42,871
li7~;I!10
(5,251)
44,026
307,446
1,375
33,968
381,563
2,330,160
339,575
61,247
(16,827)
427,764
3,141,918
8,388,378 $
9,$$~.18(j
:'8;:$3i1~
710,928
5,665,069
205,891
124,325
163,811
24,274
1,892
42,061
30,270
~;~$~~
6,616,466
1,339,696
20,829
155,226
509,806
7,194,613
9,903,779
.25;.131>.41$
746,143
44,026
307,446
32,919
33,988
1,184,501
3,955,063
1,739,704
214,818
1,787,820
1,393,546
9,090,950
59,039,706
(1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service.
(2) Internal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpose of fixed asset replacement
..5,787,$22 .
487,494
4.407,260
275.459
111,048
58,464
19,274
6,439
32.414
2,028,294
7;.42IM~
6,335,528
1,349.430
19,959
160,797
880,555
5,378,047
9,860,908
. :23,9IlS,2.24
751,394
31,544
782,938
$
1,624,903
1.400,129
153,571
1,804,647
965,782
5,949,032
50,651,327 $
Ie¡
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF FEOERAL WAY
SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES
OPERATING FUNDS
Through Navemb., 2001
1996 - 2001
$15,128,342 $15,694,065 ¡ $20,782,508 $20,T82,508 $20,782,508 $ 0.0%
1
5,970.665 5,521.760 6,430.603 6,176,60e 1 7,200.394 7.195,266 7,195,266 0.0%
6.976.393
7,352,502 7,501.3B5 1 7,9B2.153 B.BOB,1B2 9,343.500 9,905,347; 9.045,352 9,466,97B 421,626 4.7%
1,148,90; 1 40,753 110,603 90,000, B3,024 127.175 44,151 1 53.2%
B53,2BB 1,005,140, 1,342.410 I 1.4B7.111 1.5<9.767 1.445,027 1.530,411 B5,3B4 1 5.9%
4.343,100 4.4B4.091 , 3,547.922 1 4,B43,407 3.m.BOB 3,OB5,B27 2,7BB.B7B 3,497,869 70B,991 25,4%
1.313,992 ,.671,O24 2,09B,B21 , 2,250,267 1,995.56B 1,900,000 1.742,024 1.B29,3BO e7.357 5.0%
273,252 29B,997 350.804 1.311.973 1.449,605' 1.450.000 1,323,9141 1,981,036 657,122 49.6%
719,063 3,1B2.371 , 4,199.5721 4,788.444 5.079,701 6,015.400 5,507.445 1 5,57B,161 70,715 1.3%
479,560 503,236 696,407 I 5B2,719 797.95B B55,7B4 I 799,650 932,711 I :¡;:~~¿)I 15.5%
535,7B4 6B7,292 913,117 1.21B,B90 1,O04,B52 1,O99,B04' 1,027,515 ¡ 9B4,404 -4.2%
45.125 B5.B33 1 119.157 .1 100,432 100,432 ' of.
1<2.384 169,774 232.9B51 199,1B1 250.BB5 259M3 234.663 325.037 90,374 38.5%
40.979 59,492 40,211 22.06B 22,068 1 of.
57,Ð76 51,497 45,194 127.B57 B5.250 174.B09 70,442 70,442 0,0%
406.479 471.313 452.547 I 459.923 496.41BI 45B.902 45B.902 5B1,397 112.495 : 24.0%
377,B61 3B5.530 401.954 ! 543,773 495.490 511,B96 555.B4B 547.71B (9,'3D)1 -1.6%
259,110 31B,30~ I 329,497 467,777 460,025 4BB,3oo 4;::;~: 1 547.003 BB,747 19.4%
10,102 42.790 6B,686 1 65.475 75,113 1B,745 , 33.3%
554.172 511,430 B02.052 95B,75e 924.074 B41.319 B57,99B B57,99B :1 00%
141,9<9 149,173 152.157 154,440 156.337 476,306 441,9201 441,920 0.0%
2,934,767 2,676,6391 2,93B,513 3,465.534 3,O09,B93 3,165,155 2,915,B66 2,915,866 0.0%
131,931 131,282 135,103 135.770 120'3581 153.013 141.B16 137.160 (4,656)' -3,4%
696.715 I 15e.464 2B3,975 720,535 4;~:;~: 1 336,530 700.896 364.366 10B.3%
925,661 1,130.106 2,043,335 141.2B9 60,B34 6B,606 68.566 0.0%
. .27"22;6-<2 '31;100,839 .$,022;868-:. 38;820,054' '.38,428;282> .40;3aO,I... 37,566,272 '.40;616...8.. ' 2",*,737 7:8%
1 9,701 1 47%
167,448 178.402 [ 182.268 I 1BO,027 1B5,257 223,232 207,225 197,525
444,602 4B6,057 5O2,9B2 525.596 366,176 698,971 531.524 600,606 30,91B' 4.9%
1,240.9"; 1,405,41; 1 33e,945 696.704 966,958 , 931,349 983.176 (51'B2B)1 .5.6%
1,293,270 1,493,265 ',387,B33 1,733,215: 1,535,056 1,452.0B7 B3,969 5.5%
1,O66.B50 1.163,B06 1,427,473 1.143,B38 1,133,179 ',255,5B9! 1,156,275 1,051,903 104,371 9.0%
2,456.004 2,3D3.170 2.434,310 2.5BO.329 2,5B9.938 3.562.527 3,2B5.075 2,713,020 572.055 17.4%
B.321 ,974 B,B31 ,900 9,B90.079 I 10,B77.663 11.652.104 13,4B3,527 11.7B1.659 11,BBB.320 (106'651)1 -D9%
654,971 B22.20B 1.026,429 1,509,193 1,4B6.660 1,63B,93B ¡ 1.345,1B7, 1,13B"'3 206.694 15.4%
2,793,225 2,397,231 2,453,333 2.904,175 2,741,994 3,259,444, 2,992.7831 2,786,OB2 208,70' 69%
2,594,737 2,729.624 2.940,425 2.771,941 2,711,653 3,553.771 3,239.412 , 2,793,2B7 446,125' 13.B%
B58,926 1,602,556 ,.796.1931 1,759,401 1.3<9,940 2,005,169 1.9B1.174 1,345.945 635.2281 32.1%
45,406 56,292 34,602 20,238 8.441 0.0%
245,795 446.448 266,536 1 215,571 271,629 405.777 ':=~~; 1 290,822 75,650 20.7%
'01 66.465 107.702 25,778 72.949 73.9%
1.371,194 1,2B7,857 1.2B7.862 1,355,451 1,321.B66 2,IB4.014 1.932,2B4 1.461.5B4 470,500 24.4%
649.942 719,379 1.040,B24 5,3D5,731 2,253,28B 4,52B,541 4.50B,353 4.50B,353 0.0%
353,163 376,476 360,740 450,155 4B1,971 474.5B7 416,145 5O3,9B6 (B7,842) , -21.1%
67,855 111.793 161.661 165.04B 139.21B 137,815 1,403 1.0%
27,107,32B 33.554,413 30,90B,959 40,378,211 36,549,1" 33,878,883 2,070,235 7.3%
I "
7,915,329 5,005,542 7,622,303 11,9B5 1,017,154 6,B30,12B 5,618,972 552.4%
I
2,B22,839 5.3B',05BI 7,230,373! 6.490.930 5,421,849 5,421,849 0.0%
Oth.. Financing Um 5,391,5241 2.034,3721 9,253.813 11,425.3261 11,397,276 9.435,436 9,435,4361 -! 0.0%
Ending Fund Balance 205.B91 1
Sond Wa"e 213.050 296,991 1 294,316 299,842 196.3031 259.377 ofa ofa
S"",,&I,e 103,239 73,35B 103.530 ' 100,000 95,575 ofa ofa
Arterial SI,.el 362,100 470.902 477,375 349,431 456,790 41,B59 710,92B ofa ofa
UtinlyT., 1,606,52; 1 2,120,030 2,B30.14B 4,944.6841 6,220.B6B 5.665.0691 ofa, oIa
SWM 1.077,666 2.276,459 1,643,113 B12,213 324,40B 746.143 ofa ofa
Palh & T,aH, 5{),210 6.153 , 12.555 22,353 3',474 , 41,414 42,081 ofa ofa
SI'alegic Re,eNe 2,050,477 2,022,3B9 2,025,496 2.02B.204 2.033.B32 1 30.270 1 ofa ofa
Debl SeNice ',818.9091 2,9:~:~~; 1 5.283.4B2 5,746,50B 4,5<11.433 6,41B,O13 6,393,15e of. ofa
D,ma, Bay Cenl,e 115,131 13.2B6 47,775 35,745 20,140 102,904 ofa ofa
Police 1,OB2.2O7 7B6,441 ~:~;~ i ~~:~~~ ! 669.334 3OO.oo~ 1 ofa ofa
P3 :! 300,000 300.000 300,000 nla ofa
Inlem,"d Loa", 10,000 10,000 4,O;~:~~~ 1 7,3:~~~! 10.000 10,OOO! ofa nla
U",e,eNed 3.B54,369 9,O63,66B 3.532.267 1,434,B98 9,19B.623 ofa
r¡,...~.< '.fu..aala"". $<M4$'151$11øøn57 $-17 235;237 $'6;136 .W'$~1 .~~22!><$jPi!Ø~ $ $~3'.5W:<$,., 010
12/26/200110:22 AM
MEETING DATE:
January IS, 2002
ITEM# .-m: (a)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS TO COUNCIL & REGIONAL COMMITTEES
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
0 CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
~ CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: None
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure, Section 21, the Mayor makes committee
appointments each January, taking into consideration the interests and requests of individual Councilmembers. Members,
serve one-year tenDs, with each committee consisting of three members. The following committees haye been
established:
(1) Finance/Economic Deyelopment/Regional Affairs
(2) Land Userrransportation
(3) ParkslRecreation/Human Services/Public Safety
There may also be appointments other community and regional committees which haye city appointment authority.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nJa
PROPOSED MOTION: NO MOTION IS REQUIRED.
Mayor Jeanne Burbidge will announce her committee appointments for the year 2002.
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1 Sf reading
Enactment reading
MEETING DATE:
January IS, 2002
ITEM# '"SZl(b~
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA BILL
SUBJECT:
ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
0 CONSENT
0 RESOLUTION
IZI CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
0 ORDINANCE
0 PUBLIC HEARING
0 OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt.:
Contingency Req'd:
$
$
$
ATTACHMENTS: none
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At a special meeting on January IS, 2002, the City Council will interview applicants to
fill three (3) vacant commissioner positions on the city's Arts Commission. Councilmembers will confirm their
appointments at that evening's regular meeting.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: none
PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye the appointment of the following persons to the city's Arts Commission: all with 3-
year terms ending on December 31,2004".
(The City Clerk will arrange for introduction and presentation of the appointment certificates for the new appointees at the
February S'" regular meeting)
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
~\
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
0 APPROVED
0 DENIED
0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only)
COUNCIL BILL #
1 ST reading
Enactment reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
REVISED - 05/10/2001
OXFORD HOUSE
REPORT
City of Federal Way
January 14,2002
Prepared by City of Federal Way Staff
..
Table of Contents
Page
1. INTRODUCTION
2. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
3. PROGRAM........................-......................................................................-.....-.........................4
a. Activities and Daily Schedule..............................................................................................4
b. CriteriaiScreeninglBackground Check for Residents ...........................-........-.............-......4
i.
ii.
Application and Screening Process .......................-....-...-.-......................................4
Criteria for Selection of Residents .5.......................,.................................................
c. Supervision of Residents ............"................................................-.................................-....5
d. Therapy Philosophy .............-..................-............................""""""""""".........................5
e. Oxford House and Similar Facilities ...................................................................................6
i.
ii.
How Many Oxford Houses are Located in King County?......................................6
Have Other Similar Houses Been Established in Federal Way? ............................6
4. FUNDING / CDBG .............................................."..................................................................7
a. What is the total funding for this program and where did it come from? ...........................7
b. AIe any other South King County cities funding this project? ...........................................7
c. Was there notice required by CDBG funding? ...................................................................7
d. What Was the Role of King County Housing Authority?
Did the City Have any Role in Site Location?............................................................ 7
e. Can the City withdraw the CDBG funding for this project?............................................. 8
5. DATA...................................................................................................................................-... 8
a. Data regarding effectiveness of the program...................................................................... 8
i.
ii.
Anecdotal and quantitative.................................................._.................................. 8
Success Rate......_..............-.....-..............................-.............................................. 9
b. Crime Data.......................................................................................................................... 9
i.
ii.
Introduction................................-....-..-................-.................................,............... 9
Oxford Houses - Chart ..................-......................................................................1 0
6. LEGAL ISSUES - QUESTION AND SHORT ANSWER ....................................................14
a. What effect does the Federal Fair Housing AInendments Act of 1988 have on the
Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house? ....................................14
b. What Effect Does the Washington Housing Policy Act have on the Oxford
House's Request to Occupy the Twin Lakes House?...................................-..-........... 15
c. May the City Enforce the Twin Lakes Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
("CC&Rs)?....................................................._.............................................-...............15
d. If the City May Not Enforce the TwiIr Lakes CC&Rs, May the City pay the Costs of the
Homeowners' Litigation to Enforce Them? ....-.........................................-.................15
e. Is the City Prohibited By the CC&Rs from Approving Uses that Might
Violate the CC&Rs? ....................................................................................................15
f. May the City Require the Oxford House to Obtain a Home Occupation
Land Use Approval Prior to Occupying the Twin Lakes House? 15
g. May the City Require the Oxford House to Obtain a Business License Prior to Occupying
the Twin Lakes House? 15
h. May the City Withdraw or Modify its Decision to Provide Community Development
Block Grant funding to the Compass Center? ....-............................................................16
i. Is the City Financially Liable for the Activity of the Twin Lakes House Residents?.....l6
j. If the City May Not Take Any Action Concerning the Oxford House's Proposal
to Occupy the Twin Lakes House, What Options (if any) Does the City
Council have with Respect to any Future Oxford House or Other Group
Home Applications?........................................._..........._........................................... 16
7. SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 16
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Legal Analysis
B. King County CDBG Consortium - 2001 CDBG Pass-through City Project Application
C. Compass Center Letter Dated July 13, 200 I, to Director of Community Development
Requesting Letter of Determination
D. City's letter dated August 3, 2001, to Compass Center in Response to Request for Letter
Of Detennination
E. Compass Center Letter Dated October 5, 2001, Inviting City Staff To Attend Twin Lakes
Homeowners' Association Meeting
F. Electronic Mail from Ken Guza, of Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS).
G. Application for Membership In Oxford House.
H. Suggested Oxford House Interview Questions and Interview Etiquette.
I. Compass Center Management Plan for Oxford Houses.
1. Map of Oxford House Locations in King County.
K. 1999 Evaluation of Washington State ~etwork of Oxford Houses
MISCELLANEOUS ATTACHMENTS:
L. Oxford House Expectations
M. Oxford House - The Concept - A System of Operations and Traditions
ii
1. INTRODUCTION
At the City Council meeting on January 2, 2002, a number of issues and questions were
raised by residents of the Twin Lakes community concerning the location of an Oxford
House for recovering alcohol and drug abusers within the Twin Lakes neighborhood. At this
meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a report on this issue and to present the
report to the Council at the January 15,2002 meeting.
The issues and questions addressed in this report were taken from those that were identified
by Councilmembers, citizen comments at the January 2nd Council meeting and electronic
mail received subsequent to the meeting. Since the January 2nd Council meeting, City staff
researched the factual and legal questions, and have attempted to address most, if not all, of
the issues that have been identified.
The infonnation contained in this report comes from several sources including a review of
relevant documents, crime data infonnation, interviews with Compass Center and Oxford
House staff, and federal legislation and court case decisions.
The report will first present a chronology of events beginning in April 2000 and concluding
on January 9, 2002. The report will also summarize the Oxford House program, structure,
data, and will review issues related to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
program and requirements. The report will then present crime statistics for each Oxford
House in King County and the house located in Edmonds (this infonnation has also been
requested for locations in Pierce County but this infonnation has not been received, as of the
completion of this report). Finally, the report will present an analysis of a number of legal
issues.
2. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
04/00
05/00
06/00
06/12/00
07/01/00
King County Housing Authority submitted application for 2001 CDBG capital
funds. See attachment B. The request was for $20,000 to purchase a single-
family house of 3000+ square feet to use as housing for persons in recovery
from substance abuse. The application stated that the house would be located
"somewhere in South King County" and that at least eight adults would reside
in the house.
City staff review of applications.
Human Services Commission review of applications.
Human Services Commission interviewed King County Housing Authority
and Oxford House.
Public Notice of Human Services Commission's preliminary
recommendations and Public Hearing.
Note: Oxford House was not listed in the public notice, as the project was not
included in the original recommendations, due to limited funds available.
. '
07/17/00
07/21/00
08/07/00
09/05/00
09/00
06/01
06/25/01
07/13/01
08/03/01
Oxford House was included in the contingency plan. The written contingency
plan was distributed at the Public Hearing.
Public Hearing
The Human Services Commission finalized the 2001 funding
recommendations and contingency plan.
A revised estimate of funds available was received from King County. The
original recommendations were based on an estimated total of $488,302. On
July 21, 2000 the revised estimate was $591,177. The contingency plan was
used to adjust the recommendations to the amount of funds available. This
included $20,000 for the Oxford House project.
The Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety Council
Committee reviewed the Commission's recommendations including the
funding for Oxford House. The Committee approved the Commission's
recommendations and forwarded them on to the full City Council for review.
The City Council approved the 2001 CDBG Proposed Use of Funds, including
$20,000 for an Oxford House project. The application for this project was to
locate a house in South King County. When the project was approved for
CDBG funding the location was yet to be determined.
Project was transferred from King County Housing Authority, as the owner of
the house, to Compass Center.
King County contracted with Compass Center for this project. The contract
included King County funds and City of Federal Way CDBG funds. The
County directly administers the capital CDBG funds allocated to non-profit
agencies for the City ofFedera1 Way, as the City is a member of the CDBG
Consortium.
Compass Center began looking for a house for this program.
Compass Center telephorted City staff to inquire about the process for
requesting an exception to tñe zoning code, which limits the number of
unrelated adults allowed to live in a single-family home. City staff advised
Compass Center to submit a written request.
Compass Center submits a written request asking for a letter of determination
that the proposed use for a single-family home in the Stone Brook
neighborhood is permitted under the City of Federal Way's Municipal Code,
Section 22.1 Definition of Family. See attachment C.
City staff responded in writing to the Compass Center's request for
determination that the proposed use for the single-family home is permitted
under the City's definition of family. See attachment D. The City's response
2
. '
09/19/01
09/21/01
10/05/01
10/17/01
10-11/01
11/06/01
11/30/01
12/20/01
01/02/02
states that based on acceptable documentation that Oxford House operates a
residence for persons in recovery and proyides services to these disabled
persons, the residential project would be considered exempt from Federal
Way land use processes, procedures, and fees. The number of persons
residing in the house would not be limited by the Federal Way City Code
definition of family.
Compass Center receives a signed State contract for funding of this project.
Compass Center closes on the house purchase in Federal Way.
The City receives a letter from the Compass Center inviting City staff to
attend the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association meeting. See attachment E. .
Representatives from the Compass Center, Oxford House, King County
Housing Division, and a City planning staff member attended the Twin Lakes
Homeowners' Association Board meeting.
Project representatives provided information about the Oxford House and
addressed questions and concerns.
City staff was invited by the Compass Center to attend the meeting. A City
planning staff member attended the meeting to address any questions from the
association regarding the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
allocation to this program.
From conversations with Compass Center staff members, it is the City's
understanding that the Compass Center Executive Director had follow-up
telephone conversations with the Homeowners' Association President to
discuss the project.
An architect applies for a City building permit on behalf of Compass Center to
replace the roof, replace the deck, and remodel the family room to make an
additional bedroom.
Building permit is ready to issue and applicant is notified. In addition to a
City building permit, the agency applied to the Homeowners Association for
approval :from their design review committee. According to Compass Center
representatives, no approval from the Homeowners Association has been
received to date.
Neighbors in Twin Lakes start contacting City Councilmembers and City staff
with questions on the Oxford House.
Building permit issued to architect.
Twin Lakes residents attend the City Council meeting to voice numerous
complaints over the location of the Oxford House- The City Council directs
3
City staff to prepare a report responding to questions raised by citizens and
Council.
01/03/02
Building Official rescinds the building permit based on missing information
on the original application. The applicant is notified that information on
whether the home is a licensed care facility under the Building Code is
required.
01107/02
City staff meets with representatives from Oxford House, Compass Center,
King County Housing and Community Development to obtain information
requested by the City Council for inclusion in this report.
01109/02
Electronic mail received from Ken Guza of Department of Social and Health
Services (DSHS) stating that the State does not license the Oxford House as a
Licensed Care facility. See attachment F.
3. PROGRAM
a. Activities and Daily Schedule
Oxford House is an independent living situation and does not provide treatment. The
majority of Oxford House residents work during the day and are home evenings and
weekends. The stated goal of Oxford House is to provide a supportive, clean and sober
living environment.
Residents can live in an Oxford House as long as they want and as long as they follow
house rules. In Washington State, the average length of stay is 13 to 15 months. There
are individuals who have resided in houses for five or more years.
All residents participate in the management of the house. Each house elects officers to
manage the house including a president, treasurer, secretary, comptroller, and
coordinator. House meetings are held each week and attendance is required.
The house will have up to eight residents. Typically, about half of the residents have
.cars. Parking is available for two cars in the garage and another two cars in the driveway.
b. CriteriaiScreening/Background Cheëk for Residents
i.
Application and Screening Process
Referrals to Oxford House come from a variety of sources including treatment
agencies, 12 step support groups, Veterans' Administration, other agencies and
word of mouth. Each applicant is required to fill out a written application. The
application is forwarded to the specific house that the applicant wants to reside in.
See attachment G.
The residents of the house interview each applicant. During the interview,
applicants are asked if they have any current legal issues pending. See attachment
4
H. It is the policy of Oxford House not to accept anyone on probation for sex
offenses due to the periodic presence of house residents' children in the home.
Oxford House policy encourages residents to rebuild family connections
including regular visits and overnight visits of minor children. During the
interview applicants are also asked about violent behavior. Those with violent
behavior are screened out, as the house residents do not want to live with violent
housemates. There is no formal background check. Following the interview, the
house members yote on whether or not to allow the individual to join the house.
It takes an 80% "yes" vote by house members for an individual to be admitted.
Residents who break the house rules can be voted out by a 50% Yote. Those who
relapse are immediately expelled.
ii.
Criteria for Selection of Residents Include:
. Persons who have incomes ofless than 50% of the area median and who are
exiting inpatient treatment, have completed outpatient treatment, or have been
clean and/or sober for at least 30 days;
. A willingness to remain clean and sober;
. A willingness to participate in self-management of the house;
. A willingness to pay rent in a timely manner;
. A willingness to avoid disruptive behavior; and
. A willingness not to tolerate violations of the "clean and sober at all times"
rule in oneself or others.
According to Compass Center's Management Plan for Oxford Houses,
"prospective residents will have completed a treatment program and be alcohol
and drug free at the time of application to a house. See attachment I.
c. Supervision of Residents
Oxford House is not a treatment program; it is a residence. It does not have staff
members or provide direct services. When houses first start up a veteran member of
another Oxford House will move into the new house to act as a mentor and get the house
started. Houses are self-managed, independent, and organized to support recovery.
Residents are encouraged to attend AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) or NA (Narcotics
Anonymous) meetings and to seek additional treatment or counseling if needed.
Residents must abide by the house rules. The primary rules are:
. Any resident who relapses must be immediately expelled;
. Residents who break other house rules or are disruptive can be voted out by a
50% vote by the house members;
. Houses are financially self-supporting with all expenses paid by the residents;
and
. Houses operate democratically.
5
d. Therapy Philosophy
The program does not provide therapy or direct services. Oxford House is an
independent living situation. Oxford House has as its primary goal the provision of
housing and rehabilitative support for the alcoholic or addict who wants to stop drinking
or using and remain clean and sober.
e. Oxford Houses and Similar Facilities.
i.
How many Oxford Houses are located in King County?
The Oxford House website www.oxfordhouse.orf! states that there are
approximately 90 Oxford Houses in Washington State. Of those, 21 are located
in King County including locations in Kirkland, Lake Forest Park, Renton,
Shoreline, and Seattle. See attachment J. In addition, Oxford House has recently
received funding ITom ARCH (A Regional Coalition for Housing) and the King
County Housing Opportunity Fund to locate a house in East King County and is
currently exploring two potential sites in Kirkland.
ii.
Have other similar houses been established in Federal Way?
Yes. According to Multi-Service Center staff, the Multi-Service Center operates
two transitional houses for men recovering from substance abuse. One of the
Multi-Service Center homes has a maximum of eight residents and the other a
maximum of six. The two homes generally have four - five residents per house.
The Multi-Service Center provides case management to the residents. The
screening process includes a staff meeting with potential residents, extensive
application, and background references and housing references. New residents
are required to be clean and sober for 30 days prior to admission into a home.
Residents are informed it is a case-managed program with 30% of the income
used for services received. Case Managers work with residents extensively on
barriers such as permanent housing, job search, focus on sobriety, and aftercare.
Residents must follow all rules of the house or will be asked to leave. The goal is
to function as any other house in the neighborhood. There is no on-site
supervision. Case management involves announced and unannounced visits by
the case manager, a screening process, and weekly meetings with each individual
resident. The current Program Manager does not recall anyone being asked to
leave due to neighborhood issues in the past four years.
There are a number of other types of group homes located throughout Federal
Way that serve a variety of populations including senior citizens, people with
disabilities, and chronically mentally ill individuals.
6
4. FUNDING I CDBG
a. What is the total funding for this program and where did it come from?
The total funding for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the house is $501,421. Sources
of funding are: State Housing Trust Fund ($276,136); King County Housing Opportunity
Fund ($205,285); and the City ofFederal Way CDBG Funds ($20,000). The City's
CDBG contribution to the project is four percent of the total project cost.
b. Are any other South King County cities funding this project?
No. The agency applied to the City of Auburn for CDBG funding, but that application
was not funded.
c. Was there notice required by CDBG funding?
Community notification is not a condition ofHUD funding. However, the public notice
requirements of the King County Consortium were met for the 2001 CDBG program.
Legal notice was published when the Human Services Commission conducted the public
hearing on the proposed use ofCDBG funds. The contingency plan was distributed at the
public hearing. The Hurnan Services Commission and the Parks, Recreation, Human
Services, and Public Safety Committee considered the proposed use of the funds as an
agenda item before a final recommendation was forwarded to the City Council.
Commission, Council Committee and City Council meetings are open to the public.
Agenda materials are available for public review of all Committee and Council meetings.
Additionally, King County publishes a summary of proposed one-year use offederal
funds for the following year and holds public hearings on proposed use of CDBG funds.
The King County Executive submits proposed use of CDBG funds as part of the Housing
and Community Development Plan, and application to HUD for the Consortium's CDBG
entitlements. The Metropolitan King County Council adopts the total King County
Consortiums CDBG activities, including the Pass-through Cities' and the County and
Small Cities CDBG projects, for the following year. .
The King County Consortium encourages housing developers tò communicate with the
surrounding community when locating a housing development. No specific condition for
neighborhood notification was required for the Oxford House CDBG by the City, but at
the time the project was reviewed, the Human Services Commission asked how outreach
to the community during site selection and ongoing operation of the site would be
handled. The applicants responded that community notification would occur once a site
had been selected and secured with a purchase and sale agreement.
d. What was the role of King County Housing Authority? Did the City have any role
in site location?
The function of the King County Housing Authority on the Oxford House project was to
own the property, collect lease payments and establish a reserve account, inspect the
7
house twice per year, and maintain the house as needed. These responsibilities
transferred to Compass House in September 2000.
The City did not have a role in the location of the site. The City was informed of
progress as one of the funders of the project and was invited to the Twin Lakes
Homeowners' Association meeting on October 17,2001.
e. Can the City withdraw the CDBG funding for this project?
No. The City CDBG funds for this project were for acquisition of a property somewhere
in South King County. King County executed a contract with the Compass Center for the
City CDBG funds and allocated the King County funds to this project The County
directly administers the capital CDBG funds allocated to non-profit agencies for the City,
as the City is a member of the CDBG Consortium. The property has been purchased
and the City's CDBG funds of $20,000 have been released to the applicant.
See section six for additional discussion.
5. DATA
a. Data regarding effectiveness of the program
i.
Anecdotal and quantitative
The following statistics were provided by Oxford House based upon a survey of
Oxford House residents. See attachment H.
Statistics given by Oxford House of Washington State in 1999
1997 1998
Survey Respondents 247 323
Percentage of Residents Responding 69% 72%
Number of Washington Oxford Houses 50 65
Number of Recovery Beds 436 546
Average Age 37.1 36.8
Monthly Resident Income $1,082 $1,322
Percent of Residents Employed 58% 67%
Percent of Residents who are Veterans 30.7% 27.2%
Length of Current Sobriety 12.6 months 17.1 months
Residents Served Jail Time Previously 77% 79%
Addiction - Alcohol 52% 48%
Addiction - Drugs 47% 53%
Average # of AAlNA Mtgs Attended 3.75 3.55
per week per individual
Percentage of those attending 47.1% 44.4%
counseling
% Residents that attend 12 Step Mtgs No Data 92%
8
ii.
Success rate
No quantitative data is available on the relapse rate of Oxford residents after
residents leave an Oxford House, as no tracking mechanism is in place.
According to data collected at Oxford House Chapter meetings there is an 82%
success rate in Washington State, compared to a 75% success rate nationwide.
"Success" is defined as no relapse while living in the house.
b. Crime Data
i.
Introduction
Of the approximately 90 houses in Washington State, 21 houses are located in
King County, two in Snohomish County, and eight in Pierce County. The King
County houses are grouped into three chapters - Chapters 6, II, and 13. The two
Snohomish County Homes have been grouped in King County's Chapter 13. The
eight Pierce County Houses comprise Oxford House Chapter 10.
The Federal Way Department of Public Safety made a records request for all calls
for service at Oxford Houses listed in Chapters 6, II, 13, and 10. These 31
houses fall within the following law enforcement jurisdictions: King County
Sheriff's Office, Pierce County Sheriff's Office/Tacoma Police Department,
Seattle Police Department, Edmonds Police Department, Lake Forest Park Police
Department, Kirkland Police Department, and Mount Lake Terrace Police
Department. King and Pierce County houses are those residences that fall into the
unincorporated areas.
A "call for service" is any call made to a law enforcement agency where a service
is rendered. A "call for service" mayor may not be a 911 call. In law
enforcement terms, a "hit" on an address for a "call for service" simply indicates
that a law enforcement service has been rendered at that address. For instance, a
"hit" on an address for a "call for service" does not distinguish between instances
in which a house resident is a victim and instances in which the resident is a
suspect.
At the time of this report, the Federal Way Department of Public Safety received
responses to the "call for servicë" requests from all law enforcement jurisdictions
except Mount Lake Terrace and Pierce County. The manner in which data is
reported back to the Federal Way Department of Public Safety differs among law
enforcement agencies. "Calls for services" are listed by the type of "call for
service;" statistics are for the past three years. Where an address has had more
than one "call for service," it is so noted. Where an address did not have a "hit" it
is also noted.
9
ii.
Chart
(These are Incidents Entered ~ They May Not Include All 911 Calls)
Calls for Calls for Calls for
Seattle P.D. Houses Location Service Service Service
1999 2000 2001
Ballard Oxford House (Men's) 2843 NW 69w I-Accident I-Prop Dam No Hits
Seattle, WA 98117
Crown Hill Oxford House 8053 11m Ave. W, No Hits I-Theft No Hits
(Men's) Seattle, WA 98117
Greenlake Oxford House (Men's) 8231 Wallingford No Hits No Hits No Hits
North, Seattle, W A
98103
Greenwood Oxford House 156 NW 83'" St. No Hits No Hits I-Auto Theft
(Men's) Seattle, WA 98117
Licton Springs Oxford House 744 North 104"' St. I-Theft Bike No Hits I-Dist Family
(Women's) Seattle, WA 98133
North Gate Oxford House 10036 Interlake Ave. No Hits No Hits No Hits
(Women's) N.
Seattle, WA 98113
Oaktree Oxford House (Men's) 754 North 100 St. I-Sex No Hits No Hits
Seattle, WA 98133 Offense
Simmons Oxford House 19261 Occidental No Hits No Hits No Hits
(Women's) Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 98148
Brockman Oxford (Men's) 1508 NE Brockman Not Open Not Open Opened 11101
PI. No Hits
Seattle, WA
Lake City Oxford House (Men's) 13727350' AYe. NE No Hits No Hits No Hits
Seattle, WA 98125
Levy Oxford House (Men's) 12527 20w Ave NE No Hits No Hits I-Mental
Seattle, WA 98125 l-Theft-Bldg
TOTALS -11 HOUSES (8 Men's & 3 Women's) 3 Hits! 2 Hits! 4 Hits!
8 No Hits 9 No Hits 8 No Hits
10
King County Houses Location Calls for Calls for Calls for
Service Service Service
1999 2000 2001
Bridal Trails Oxford House 7517142" NE Not Open Not Open Opened 11101
(Men's) Kirkland, W A 98033 No Hits
Kingsgate Oxford House 130l9NE 128 PI. Not Open Opened 08/00 I-Larceny
(Men's) Kirkland, WA 98034 I-Fireann I-Fire Inv.
Illegal Accid
Discharge I-Stalking
Casckade Oxford House 13018 SE 171 PI. I-DUI No Hits I-Info
(Women's) Renton, WA 98058 I-Civil Prob
Kirkland Oxford House 12503 NE 134 PI. I-Burglary No Hits 3-Mental
(Men's) Kirkland, W A 98034 2-DOC 2-Abandoned
Contact Vehicle
Juanita Oxford House 8420 NE 13~PI. l-Ciyil Prob I-Person Lost No Hits
(Men's) Kirkland, W A 98034 1-91 I Hang- Indecent!
up Nuisance
I-Larceny
Snoking Oxford House 13100NE 143'. St. I-Traffic No Hits No Hits
(Men's) Kirkland, WA 98034 Stop
l-Ciyil Prob
I-Larceny
Furlong Oxford House 18907 II AveNE Not Open Not Open Opened 09/01
(Men's) Shoreline, WA 98155 Check
Nunziato Oxford House 1610N 199 St Not Open Not Open Opened 09/01
(Women's) Shoreline, WA 98133 No Hits
TOTALS - 8 HOUSES (6 Men's & 2 Women's) 10 Hits! 2 Hits! 11 Hits!
4 No Hits 6NoHits 4NoHits
11
Edmonds P.D. Houses
Location
Calls for
Service
2001
Ballinger Oxford House
(Women's)
2280776 AYe. W.
Edmonds, W A 98043
Not Open
Not Open
Opened 07/01
No Hits
TOTALS -1 HOUSE (Women's)
Not Open
Not Open
1 No Hit
Lake Forest ParkP.D. Location Calls for Calls for Calls for
Houses Service Service Service
1999 2000 2001
Lake Forest Park Oxford 20143 47th Ave NE No Hits 2-Missing I-Harrassment
House (Women's) Lake Forest Park, WA Person 2-ViolOfCt
98155 Order
I-Citzen
Contact
TOTALS -1 HOUSE (Women's) Not Hits 2 Hits 4 Hits
Mount Lake Terrace
P.D.
Houses
Location
Calls for
Service
2001
Terrace Oxford House
(Men's)
5803 226 PI. SW
Seattle, WA 98133
No Response
TOTALS -1 HOUSE (Men's)
No Response
12
Kirkland P.D. Houses Location Calls for Calls for Calls for
Service Service Service
1999 2000 2001
Houghton Oxford House 5915 1060' AYe. SE Not Reported Not Reported I-Info-drug use
(Men's) Kirkland, WA 98033 I-Dom Dispute
I-Pos Suicide
Attempt
I-Missing
Person
TOTALS-l HOUSE (Men's) Not Reported Not Reported 4 Hits
Pierce County Houses Location Calls for I Calls for I Calls for
Service Service Service
1999 2000 2001
Ainsworth Oxford 8816 Ainsworth AYe. No Response
House (Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444
Alder Oxford House 7240 S. Alder St. No Response
(Men's) Tacoma, W A 98409
Cheney Oxford House 1015 S. Huson St. No Response
(Men's) Tacoma, W A 98405
Ruston View Oxford 4720 North Huson St. No Response
House (Women's) Tacoma, WA 98047
Fern Hill Oxford House 1601 S.90mSt. No Response
(Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444
South End Oxford House 1517S.57mSt. No Response
(Men's) Tacoma, WA 98408
Puyallup Oxford House 12421 136 Ave. E No Response
(Men's) Puyallup, WA 98375
Tacoma Narrows Oxford 615 N. Jackson AYe. No Response
House (Men's) Tacoma, WA 98406
TOTALS - 8 HOUSES (5 Men's & 3 Women's) No Response
13
.,
Pierce County Houses Location Calls for Calls for Calls for
Service Service Service
1999 2000 2001
Ainsworth Oxford House 8816 Ainsworth Ave. Not Reported I-Unknown I-Medical Aid
(Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444 Trouble I-Fire
I-ACB Info
I-Runaway
I-Runaway Pick-
up
1- Domestic
Alder Oxford House 7240 S. Alder St. Not Reported I-Dispute- I-Accident Hit &
(Men's) Tacoma, W A 98409 Neighbor Run
I-Medical Aid
I-Noise
Complaint
I-Theft
Cheney Oxford House 1015 S. Huson St. Not Reported I-Accident Hit & 1-911 Hang-up
(Men's) Tacoma, WA 98405 Run
I-Info Contact
Ruston View Oxford 4720 North Huson St. Not Reported 1- Assault - I-Fight
House (Women's) Tacoma, W A 98047 Aggravated I-Violation of 0
I-Theft Order
I-Threats
I-Trouble
w/customer
I-Unwanted
Person
Fern Hill Oxford House 1601 S.90IhSt. Not Reported I-Citizen Assist I-Overdose
(Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444 I-Medical Aid I-Prowler
I-Theft I-Shots Fired
2-Theft-Vehicle I-Suspicious
Prowl Vehicle
South End Oxford House 1517S.57IhSt. Not Reported I-Sus Vehicle I-Assault Non
(Men's) Tacoma, W A 98408 Aggravated
I-Loud Party
3-Medical Aid
I-Trouble
wlcustomer
I-Unwanted
Person
2-Welfare Check
Puyallup Oxford House 12421 I 36th Ave. E Not Reported 5-Medical Aid I-Medical Aid
(Men's) Puyallup, WA 98375 I-Agency Assist
I-Simple Assault
I-Theft - Vehicle
Prowl
Tacoma Nancows Oxford 615 N. Jackson Ave. Not Reported I-Medical Aid 1-911 Hang-up
House (Men's) Tacoma, W A 98406 I-Suicide I-Burglary
Attempt I-Investigative
Contact
I-Medical Aid
I-Suspicious
Vehicle
I-Theft
TOTALS - 8 HOUSES (S Men's & 3 Women's) Not Reported 26 Hits 32 Hits
Multi-Service Center Location Calls for Calls for Calls for
Transitional Houses in Service Service Service
Federal Way 1999 2000 2001
Transitional House I-Arson I-Vol Commit No Hits
I-Theft
Transitional House No Hits I-Found No Hits
Property
I-Welfare
Check
I-Civil Issue
I-Warrant
TOTALS 2 HOUSES 2 Hits! 5 Hits 2 No Hits
1 No Hit
6. LEGAL ISSUES I QUESTION AND SHORT ANSWER
At the January 2, 2002 City Council meeting, City Councilmembers and several citizens
raised legal questions. Subsequent to the Council meeting, other citizens raised additional
legal questions via electronic mail messages to individual City Council members. This
section discusses all of those legal questions in a question and short answer format. A longer
legal analysis is attached as attachment A for your information.
a. What effect does the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA) of 1988 haye
on the Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house?
Short answer: The FHAA invalidates any law of a State or political subdivision that
purports to require or permit any discriminatory housing practice with respect to persons
with disabilities or handicaps, or on account of familial status. The Act broadly derIDes
"handicap" to include: (I) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one
or more major life activities; (2) a record of having such an impairment; or (3) being
regarded as having such an impairment. 42 V.S.C. § 3602(h). The definition does not
include the "current, illegal use of or addition to a controlled substance,"or"persons who
have been convicted of the illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance."
Because of the language of the Act, añd its parallels with the federal Rehabilitation Act,
courts have construed this definition to include persons recovering from drug and/or
alcohol addiction. "Discrimination" includes the refusal to make reasonable
accommodation from otherwise neutrally applicable code provisions, when the
accommodation is necessary to afford disabled or handicapped persons equal opportunity
to use and enjoy a dwelling. Taken together, the Act's provisions mean that, in certain
circumstances, the City might be required to grant a "reasonable accommodation" by not
enforcing the cap on unrelated persons living in a single dwelling, if necessary to afford
handicapped persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. That is exactly
what occurred when City staff issued the August 3, 2001, letter informing Compass
14
Center that the City would not apply the 5-person limitation on unrelated persons in the
Code's definition of "family."
b. What effect does the Washington Housing Policy Act have on the Oxford House's
request to occupy the Twin Lakes house?
Short answer: If the recent decision of Division III of the Washington Court of Appeals
in Sunderlandv. City of Pasco, 107 Wn.App. 109,26 P.3d 955 (Div. III 2001) is applied
statewide, the Washington Housing Policy Act prevents a city from requiring a provider
of group housing for disabled or handicapped persons to undergo a special or conditional
use permit process before being allowed to occupy a single-family house, if the city
permits a "family" to obtain immediate occupancy of a residential structure without such
a permit.
c. May the City enforce the Twin Lakes Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
("CC&Rs")?
Short answer: No. Covenants are essentially contracts between private parties and may
only be enforced by the parties to or beneficiaries of the contract. The City is neither a
party to the CC&Rs nor an owoer of property benefited by them. Therefore, the City
cannot enforce the CC&Rs.
d. If the City may not enforce the Twin Lakes CC&Rs, may the City pay the costs of
the homeowners' litigation to enforce them?
Short answer: No. The City's payment oflitigation costs of private parties seeking to
enforce private CC&Rs would be an unconstitutional gift of public funds or constitute an
unlawful lending of credit
e. Is the City prohibited by the CC&Rs from approving uses that might violate the
CC&Rs?
Short answer: No. The CC&Rs are not binding on the City in its land use decisions.
f. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a home occupation land use
approval prior to occupying the Twi.!l Lakes house?
Sport answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not fit the
definition of home occupation under the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). Therefore, no
home occupation land use approval may be required.
g. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a business license prior to
occupying the Twin Lakes house?
Short answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not fit the
definition of business under the FWCC.
15
h. May the City withdraw or modify its decision to provide Community Deyelopment
Block Grant funding to the Compass Center?
Short answer: No. The money has already been disbursed and the contract does not
provide for means by which money may be recovered under these circumstances. In
addition, withdrawal of funding in response to neighborhood opposition to housing for
disabled would likely be held to be discrimination in yiolation of the FHAA.
i. Is the City financially liable for the actiyity of the Twin Lakes house residents?
Short answer: No. The City would not be liable, because it is protected from suit for its
land use permitting actions by the public duty doctrine.
j. If the City may not take any action concerning the Oxford House's proposal to
occupy the Twin Lakes house, what options (if any) does the City Council have with
respect to any future Oxford House or other group home applications?
Short answer: The City Council may consider adoption of code amendments to regulate
future group housing applications, such as a formal process by which to evaluate requests
for reasonable accommodation, or a permit process for certain types of group homes.
Any amendments, however, must be carefully tailored to avoid discrimination in
violation of the FHAA or the WHP A.
7. SUMMARY
In summary, City staff have not identified a legal basis to reverse the August 3, decision to
grant Oxford House a reasonable accommodation to permit the Twin Lakes location of an
Oxford House. We do not offer any opinion as to the basis of a potential challenge by the
Twin Lakes Homeowners Association based on the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions.
However, there are several actions the Council might request of Compass Center and Oxford
House to enable the facility to function well within the community and to resolve any
problems or issues which might arise. Actions the Council might consider are:
I. Community Informational Meetings - The Council could request that Compass Center
and Oxford House sponsor one or morë information meetings in the community about
Oxford House and to foster communication between Oxford House residents and the
Twin Lakes community.
2. Establish a Neighborhood Advisory Council- It is staff's understanding that Compass
Center has established, in other similar facilities, a Neighborhood Advisory Council.
This advisory council could meet monthly to further ensure good communication
between the House and the community and provide a forum to resolve any problems or
issues that may arise.
3. Reporting Procedures - The Council could request that the Oxford House provide a
monthly report to the Council and the Twin Lakes Homeowners Association on the status
16
of the House. This report might summarize activities of the House, any management
issues and any incidents that might have occurred.
4- Community Service - The Council might request that Oxford House residents agree to
contribute a certain amount of community service time each month to the Twin Lakes
community-
5. Code AInendments - The Council could direct City staff to prepare Code AInendments to
provide better public notification for consideration of any similar future applications for
group homes.
It is acknowledged that with the exception of number five, as listed above, the Council
cannot require these actions. However, they are actions the Council might request to enable
greater communication and understanding between the Oxford House and the Twin Lakes
community and to ensure continued monitoring of Oxford House both by the City and the
Twin Lakes community.
K:(LA W)loxford houseldocumentslreport 1-14-02
17
LEGAL ISSUES/ANALYSIS
1. What effect does the Federal Fair Housing AInendments Act of 1988 have on
the Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house? .
2- What effect does the Washington Housing Policy Act have on the Oxford
House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house?
3. May the City enforce the Twin Lakes Coyenants, Conditions and Restrictions
("CC&Rs")?
4. If the City may not enforce the Twin Lakes CC&Rs, may the City pay the
costs of the homeowners' litigation to enforce them?
5. Is the City prohibited by the CC&Rs from approying uses that might yiolate
the CC&Rs?
6. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a home occupation land use
approval prior to occupying the Twin Lakes house?
7. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a business license prior to
occupying the Twin Lakes house?
8. May the City withdraw or modify its decision to provide Community
Development Block Grant funding to the Compass Center?
9. Is the Compass Center, Oxford House, or the City financially liable for the
activity of the Twin Lakes house residents?
10. If the City may not take any action concerning the Oxford House's proposal to
occupy the Twin Lakes house, what options (if any) does the City Council
have?
These questions are discussed seriatim below.
1. What effect does the Federal Fair Housin!! Amendments Act of 1988 ("FHAA")
have on the Oxford House's request to occupv the Twin Lakes house?
Short answer: The FHAA invalidates any law of a State or political subdivision
that purports to require or permit any discriminatory housing practice with respect
to handicapped persons, or on account of familial status. The definition of
"handicapped" includes persons recovering from drug and/or alcohol addiction.
"Discrimination" includes the refusal to make reasonable accommodation from
otherwise neutrally applicable code provisions, when the accommodation is
necessary to afford disabled or handicapped persons equal opportunity to use and
enjoy a dwelling. Taken together, these provisions mean that, in certain
circumstances, the FHAA requires the City to grant a "reasonable
accommodation" by not enforcing the land use code's cap on the number of
unrelated persons liying together, if necessary to afford handicapped persons an
equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. This is exactly what the City did
when staff issued the August 3, 2001 letter informing Compass Center that the
City would not apply the 5 unrelated person limit in the Code's definition of
"family" to bar Oxford House from using the Twin Lakes House.
Analvsis:
Introduction
When the federal Fair Housing Act is mentioned, most people think first about
well-publicized cases from the civil rights era in which banks and landlords were
sued for racially discriminatory rental and lending policies. Few realize that the
Fair Housing Act significantly limits municipal zoning power with respect to
single-family and other residential neighborhoods.
As originally adopted in 1968, the Fair Housing Act prohibited discrimination
against persons in the terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rental of a
dwelling on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin. "Sex" was added
as a protected class in 1974. As originally adopted, the Act also invalidated "any
law of a State, a political subdivision, or any other such jurisdiction that purports
to require or permit any action that would be a discriminatory housing practice
under the Act." 42 U.S.C. § 3615.
In 1985, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in City ofCleburne v.
Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 LEd.2d 313
(1985). The case involved the denial of a use permit to operate a group home for
mentally retarded adults. The denial was challenged on constitutional grounds;
the Center alleged that it violated the Equal Protection Clause because it treated
mentally handicapped persons wishing to live in a residential neighborhood
differently than others who might wish to live in the same location. Therefore,
the Center argued, the handicapped were a "quasi-suspect" class, which required
the application of heightened scrutiny of the validity ofthe City's governmental
interest in treating the handicapped differently.
The United States Supreme Court disagreed that the handicapped were a "quasi-
suspect" class and declined to subject the City's decision to heightened scrutiny.
The Court did conclude, howeyer, that the City's denial nevertheless violated the
Equal Protection clause because the City could not point to anything in the record
that provided a rational basis for requiring a special use permit for a home for the
mentally handicapped when it did not also require such a permit for other types of
group homes in the same residential zone. The Court noted that the fact the City
Council had been concerned with the "negative attitudes, or fear," of the majority
of property owners in the neighborhood was not sufficient justification for the
permit denial:
But mere negatiye attitudes, or fear, unsubstantiated by factors which are
properly cognizable in a zoning proceeding, are not permissible bases for
treating a home for the mentally retarded differently from apartment
houses, multiple dwellings, and the like.
2
473 U.S. at 448. "The short of it," the Court noted, was that "requiring the
permit in this case appears to us to rest on an irrational prejudice against the
mentally retarded. . . ." ¡d. at 450. The Court therefore invalidated the ordinance
requiring the special permit.
Although the group homeowner won the case, the Court's refusal to extend the
protection of its heightened scrutiny in Equal Protection cases to the handicapped
spurred renewed lobbying in Congress resulting in the 1988 Fair Housing
AInendments Act. Note, The Fair Housing Act, Oxford House, and the Limits of
Local Control Over the Regulation of Group Homes for Recovering Addicts, 36
Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1467, 1472-73 (Douglas E- Miller 1995),
The Fair Housing AInendments Act of 1988
The Act added familial status to the list of classes protected under the Act. 42
U.S.C. § 3604(a) - (e). It also expressly made it unlawful to "discriminate in the
sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer
or renter because of a handicap of that buyer or renter or a person residing in or
intending to reside in that dwelling." 42 U.s.C § 3604(f).
The Act broadly defined "handicap" to include: (I) a physical or mental
impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) a
record of having such an impairment; or (3) being regarded as having such an
impairment. 42 U.S.C. § 3602(h)- The definition does not include the "current,
illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance," or "persons who have been
convicted of the illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance." It
appears established, howeyer, that the definition does include persons recovering
ftom drug and/or alcohol addicition. The definition of "handicap" is construed as
including recovering alcoholics and drug addicts because of the FHAA's
legislative history, and because the courts construe the FHAA in parallel with the
Rehabilitation Act (which expressly includes recovering alcoholics and drug
addicts within its definition of disabled.) This has prompted at least one court to
observe that "it is well established that individuals recovering ftom drug or
alcohol addiction are handicapped under the Act. Corporation of the Episcopal
Church in Utah v. West Valley City, 119 F.Supp.2d 1215 (D. Utah 2000).\
Because the Act as adopted in 1968 invalidated any law that purported to require
or permit any act that would be discriminatory, the 1988 amendments' addition of
"handicapped" to the list of protected classes made it possible for housing
adyocates to argue that the FHAA potentially inyalidated any municipal law that
discriminated, or made unayailable or denied a dwelling to any person because of
a handicap. As several commentators have noted, the FHAA and its legislative
I However, a federal district court in Washington reiected a claim that residents "impaired by drug or
alcohol dependency" were handicapped, based on the FHAA's exclusion of current substance abusers tram
the definition of "handicap." Children's Alliance v. City of Bellevue, 950 F.Supp. 1491, 1495, n.5 (W.O.
Wash. 1997) (italics in original).
3
history indicate that Congress intended that municipal land use as well as health
and safety regulations comply with its provisions.2
In another new twist, the 1988 FHAA also defined "discrimination" to include "a
refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices or
services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person
equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling." 42 U.S.c. § 3604(f)(3)(B).
Exemptions
Notably, the Act does exempt at least two types of municipal regulations. First, it
exempts "any reasonable local, State, or Federal restrictions regarding the
maximum number of occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling." 42 U.s.C. §
3607(b )(1). This exemption, however, protects only traditional building code-
type occupancy limitations based on square footage, number of bedrooms, etc.,
and does not protect definitions of "family" that limit the number of unrelated
persons who may live together while placing no limit on the number of related
persons. City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., 514 U.S. 725, 115 S.Ct. 1776,
131 LEd.2d 801 (1995).
Second, the Act states that it does not require "that a dwelling be made available
to an individual whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health or
safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would result in a substantial physical
damage to the property of others.") In addition, the anti-discrimination proyisions
do not extend to persons who claim to be disabled solely on the basis of having
been adjudicated a juvenile delinquent, haying a criminal record, or being a sex
offender (although such indiyiduals may claim to be disabled, and therefore
protected, as a result of other mental or physical impairments). 4
How a City May be Sued Under the FHAA
Since its adoption, courts haye giyen the Act broad application, and haye required
"a generous construction. .in order to carry out a policy that Congress considered
to be of the highest priority." United States v. Columbus Country Club, 915 F.2d
877,883 (3rd Cir. 1990). Courts haye determined that a city may be shown to
have violated the Act in three ways:
2 Gathe, Group Homes: Local Control and Regulation Versus Federal and State Fair Housing Laws at 2-
3 (Washington State Bar Association 1997); 36 Wm & Mary L. Rev. at 1474, esp. n.48; 3 Zoning and
Planning Law Handbook, § 3.02[2], p. 87-88 (1999) ("there is no question these prohibitions apply to state
and local governmental actions or inactions in the exercise of their zoning powers.").
, Determining whether someone presents a direct threat must be made on an individualized basis. It cannot
be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature ora disability. Joint Statement of the
Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Group Homes, Local Land
Use, and the Fair Housing Act, at 2 (1999); see also Children's Alliance v. Bellevue, 950 F.Supp. 1491,
1499 (W.D. Wash. 1997).
4 Joint Statement of the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Group Homes, Local Land Use, and the Fair Housing Act, at I (1999).
4
I. If the city intentionally discriminates in the adoption or enforcement of
an ordinance or regulation;
2. If the city adopts or enforces an ordinance that has a disparate impact
on the handicapped; or
3. If the city fails to make a reasonable accommodation when necessary
to afford handicapped persons reasonable access to a dwelling.
See Burney and Wiener, Group Homes: The Struggle to Determine the
Boundaries of the Fair Housing Amendments Act, 41 Municipal Lawyer No.3 at
10 (May/June 2000).
With respect to the first category, discriminatory intent, or "differential
treatment," is most plainly described as "intentional discrimination against
handicapped persons, based solely on the handicap." Id. While some federal
courts have analyzed up to five separate factors to determine whether
discriminatory intent exists,S at least one Washington federal court has concluded
that a plaintiff alleging intentional discrimination need show only that "the
defendant expressly treats members of a protected group differently than others
who are similarly situated." Children's Alliance v. Bel/evue, 905 F. Supp, At
1495. As Judge Zilly noted, "differential treatment on the face of an ordinance
demonstrates an intent to discriminate; additional eyidence of discriminatory
animus is not required." Id.
In a decision decided just two days after Judge Zilly's decision in Children's
Alliance, however, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that, in order to
establish a disparate treatment claim, the plaintiff must first establish a prima
facie case by proving four factors. Gamble v. City of Escondido, 104 F.3d 300,
305 (9th Cir. 1997). The burden then shifts to the defendant to articulate a
legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its action. If it does so, the plaintiff must
prove by a preponderance of evidence that the reason asserted by the defendant is
mere pretext. In so doing, the Court held, the plaintiff s "proof of discriminatory
motive is crucial to a disparate treatment claim." Gamble, 104 F.3d at 305.
When a city articulates a legitimate, nondiscriminatory basis for its actions, there
has been disagreement as to whether a city may simply point to ;my rational,
nondiscriminatory basis for its actions, or whether the potential universe of
rationales is more limited. In Children's Alliance v. Bel/evue, a Washington
federal district court judge noted that while the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals
employed the same "rational basis" standard used in evaluated claims under the
Equal Protection Act, the district would instead follow the approach used by the
S The five factors are: discriminatory impact; the historical background of the decision; the sequence of
events leading up to the challenged decision; departures !Tom the normal procedural sequence; and
departures !Tom normal substantive criteria. Id., citing Stewart B. McKinney Foundation, Inc. v. Town Plan
& Zoning Comm'n of Fairfield, 790 F.Supp. 1197, 121 I (D. Conn. 1992).
5
Sixth and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeals, in which a city could rebut a showing
of facial discrimination only by showing either "(I) that the ordinance benefits the
protected class or (2) that it responds to legitimate safety concerns raised by the
individuals affected, rather than being based on stereotypes." Children's
Alliance, 950 F.Supp. at 1498. This standard appears too strict, in light of the fact
that Gamble, decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals two days after
Children's Alliance, held that concern for the character of a single-family
neighborhood was a legitimate and nondiscriminatory reason sufficient to rebut a
showing of differential treatment / intentional discrimination. Although the issue
as fÌamed in Children's Alliance has yet to be expressly decided by the Ninth
Circuit, Gamble appears to rule out such an argument.
Under the second category of actions, even if a particular regulation does not treat
handicapped persons differently and therefore, no intentional discrimination has
occurred, a plaintiff may still demonstrate a violation of the FHAA if the plaintiff
demonstrates that a regulation has a "disparate impact" on the handicapped. To
do so, the plaintiff must establish "at least that the defendant's actions had a
discriminatory effect." Gamble, 104 F.3d at 306. This requires: "(1) the
occurrence of certain outwardly neutral practices, and (2) a significantly adverse
or disproportionate impact on persons of a particular type produced by the
defendant's facially neutral acts or practices." Id. This typically requires
statistical or other evidence to establish the disparate impact; "raising an inference
of discriminatory impact is insufficient." Id. Further, a plaintiff may not rely on a
comparison between the disabled and non-disabled single families. The relevant
comparison group is other groups of similar sizes living together. "Otherwise, all
that has been demonstrated is a discriminatory effect on group living." Id.
Finally, even if a regulation does not involve differential treatment of the
handicapped, nor has a differential impact, the FHAA may still be violated "when
a municipality refuses to make reasonable accommodations in its rules when such
accommodations may be necessary to afford handicapped persons equal
opportunity for housing." Turning Point, Inc. v. City of Caldwell, 74 F.3d 941,
945 (9th Cir. 1996). In general, a "reasonable accommodation" is defined as "one
which would not impose an undue hardship or burden upon the entity making the
accommodation. . .and would not undermine the basic purpose which the
requirement seeks to achieve." United States v. Village of Marshall, 787 F.Supp.
872,878 (W.D. Wisc- 1991).6 Whether a reasonable accommodation is required
"will vary depending on the facts of a giyen case." [d. There is a circuit split on
the question of which party bears the burden of showing if an accommodation is
reasonable. Most circuits place the burden with the plaintiff, but the Third Circuit
6 One citizen cited Marshall as authority for the proposition that no accommodation need be provided in
the case ofthe Twin Lakes Oxford House, because such an accommodation would impose an undue burden
upon "the residents of Twin Lakes." Letter to City Council from Dave McKenzie, delivered January 2,
2002, at 2. The key inquiry, however, is whether the accommodation would place an undue burden on "the
entitv making the accommodation," which in this case would be the City - which granted an
accommodation from its code's definition of "family" - not the Twin Lakes neighborhood. The citation to
Marshall, 787 F. Supp. at 878 (emphasis added).
6
and at least one district court in the loth Circuit haye concluded that the
responsibility to initiate and make the accommodation rests with the city.
Episcopal Church v. West Valley. 119 F.Supp.2d at 122], n.], and at 1222, citing
Hovsons v. Township of Brick, 89 F.3d 1096 (3rd Cir. 1996).
In determining whether the reasonableness requirement has been met, a court may
consider a number of factors:
The extent to which the accommodation would undermine the legitimate
purposes and effects of existing zoning regulations and the benefits that
the accommodation would provide to the handicapped. It may also
consider whether alternatiyes exist to accomplish the benefits more
efficiently. And in measuring the effects of an accommodation, the court
may look not only to its functional and administrative aspects, but also to
its costs. "Reasonable accommodations" do not require accommodations
which impose undue financial and administrative burdens, or changes,
adjustments, or modifications to existing programs that would be
substantial, or that would constitute fundamental alterations in the nature
of the program.
Bryant Woods Inn, Inc. v. Howard County, 124 F.3d 597, 604 (4th Cir. 1997). As
summed up by federal regulators:
Not all requested modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. If a
requested modification imposes an undue financial or administrative
burden on a local government, or if a modification creates a fundamental
alteration in a local government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a
"reasonable" accommodation.
Joint Statement ofDOJ and HUD at 1 (attached).
The Joint Statement goes on to provide a comparison of circumstances the federal
agencies belieye would and would not require a reasonable accommodation. For
example, a group home for four mentally retarded adults which sought a
reasonable accommodation ITom a code definition of family that prohibited four
or more unrelated persons ITom living together would be entitled to such an
accommodation, given that the group home would likely be able to show that it
will haye no more impact on parking, traffic, noise, utility use, and other typical
concerns of zoning than a "family," and therefore, there would be no undue
burden or expense for the local government nor would the single-family character
of the neighborhood be fundamentally altered. Id. at 3.
This situation is in stark contrast, however, with that of a fifty-bed nursing home
attempting to locate in a single-family neighborhood:
7
[Tills] would not ordinarily be considered an appropriate use in a single-
family neighborhood, for obvious reasons haying nothing to do with the
disabilities of its residents. Such a facility might or might not impose
significant burdens and expense on the community, but it would likely
create a fundamental change in the single-family character of the
neighborhood. On the other hand, a nursing home might not create a
"fundamental change" in a neighborhood zoned for multi-family housing.
The scope and magnitude of the modification requested, and the features
of the surrounding neighborhood are among the factors that will be taken
into account in determining whether a requested accommodation is
reasonable.
¡d.
The Municipal Research and Services Center has not issued any comprehensive
opinion on the subject. In 1999, it did issue a brief opinion, in which it noted that
whether a reasonable accommodation is required is a fact specific inquiry, and
that whether a home with 7, 8, 12 or 15 residents must be allowed will depend on
the circumstances. See Memorandum to Edith Duttlinger, Senior Planner for the
City of Mountlake Terrace.
More illuminating are decisions of the federal courts themselyes. In Turning
Point v. City of Caldwell, the Ninth Circuit upheld a finding that the City of
Caldwell's grant of an accommodation fÌom its 12 unrelated person-maximum
applicable to boarding houses in a commercial neighborhood, by increasing the
maximum fÌom 12 to 15, was not reasonable, where evidence showed that under
the city's building code, the building could have accommodated 25 persons.
(Turning Point operated a homeless shelter out of an existing single-family house
in a commercial zone, in which seventy-five percent of the residents were
handicapped). The building official concluded that, with appropriate ceiling
height modifications, the house could reasonably accommodate 25 individuals;
Turning Point sought 40, arguing that any lower number would pose a severe
financial burden for it and force it to close the shelter. At the City Council
meeting, one Council member stated that although the letter of the law would
dictate that 25 persons was a reasonable figure, the spirit of the law would
indicate a much lower number. He proposed 15, and a majority of the Council
agreed. Turning Point sued, and the trial court reinstated the 25-person
maximum. The trial court noted that the l5-person limitation was not calculated
according to any uniform code or zoning ordinance, was not necessary to preserve
the character of a single-family residential zone, while at the same time, the 15-
person limit "was a seyere financial burden. . .that would eventually force it to
close" the shelter. 74 F.3d at 943-44. For these reasons, the court concluded that
Caldwell had failed to make a reasonable accommodation. On appeal, the Ninth
Circuit agreed. It also invalidated a condition requiring annual review of the
Special Use Permit conditions, noting that the contingencies to which the
8
conditions were directed could be controlled under the ordinary law of nuisance
and the city's power to abate them. !d. at 945.
In the Children's Alliance case, the district court invalidated the City of
Bellevue's entire regulation governing group homes, including its definition of
"family" that limited residency to no more than 6 unrelated persons- The court.
noted that the City had not offered any evidence to justifY treating homes with
youth and handicapped residents differently from dwellings comprised of
individuals related by blood. 950 F.Supp. at 1499. The court specifically rejected
eyidence offered by the City Attorney concerning the eyidence of crime
committed by individuals with a prior criminal record who would reside in the
youth homes. The Court noted that the city had offered no evidence showing that
the residents of the group homes were more dangerous than if they lived with
their relatives, and therefore concluded that the City's "public safety rationale
does not stand up under scrutiny - . , ." ld.
On the other hand, two courts haye upheld caps on the number of unrelated
persons who may live together. In Bryant Woods, the Fourth Circuit upheld the
denial of a conditional use permit to a homeowner who rented to Alzheimer's
sufferers. 124 F.3d 597. The County's code permitted up to 8 unrelated persons
as a matter of right, and the owner sought approval to increase this to 15 persons.
ld- at 599. The Court noted that the record indicated that although the group
home residents did not drive, they received frequent visitors and there was
eyidence that eyen with 8 residents the home generated parking spillover onto
nearby streets. ld. at 604. While recognizing that some minimum size might be
essential for a group home to be fmancially viable, or to provide a therapeutically
valuable environment, the homeowner presented no eyidence that the increase
from 8 to 15 would make a difference. ld. at 605. Further, the record showed that
there were 30 group homes in the County with 8 or fewer residents. Taken
together, the Court ruled, the eyidence demonstrated only that the owner's for-
profit corporation would financially benefit, and this advantage was not required
by the FHAA- !d.
Likewise, in Oxford House-C v. City ofSt. Louis,1 the Eighth Circuit Court of
Appeals upheld the City of St. Louis' eight-person limitation on the number of
unrelated persons who could liye together in a group home under the definition of
"family." The Court noted that the City's ordinance did not discriminate against
the handicapped because the code allowed only three unrelated persons to live
together but allowed up to eight unrelated handicapped residents if in a group
home. 77 F.3d at 251-52. And, because the Eighth Circuit utilizes the less strict
"rational basis" standard ofreyiew, the Court ruled that the City needed only to
articulate a "rational basis" for the 8-person group home maximum. Noting that
the City had a legitimate interest in decreasing congestion, traffic, and noise in
residential areas, the Court held that the City was not required "to assert a specific
reason for choosing eight as the cut-off point, rather than ten or twelve. Every
J 77 F.3d 249 (8'" Cir. 1996).
9
line drawn by a legislature leaves some out that might well haye been included."
!d.
Recently, other courts haye upheld six and eight-person limits, respectiyely- Keys
Youth Services, Inc. v. City ofOlathe, 248 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2001); Frazier v.
City of Grand Ledge, 135 F.Supp.2d 845 (W.D. Mich. 2001). In Olathe, the trial
court upheld the City's denial of a special use permit to increase the number of
residents in a home for troubled juveniles ftom the eight-person maximum for
group homes to ten- The City based its denial on eyidence in the record that the
youths that would reside in the home were classified as Level V, meaning that
they are typically antisocial and aggressive, engaging in assaults, batteries, thefts,
and yandalism. 248 F.3d at 1274. Evidence was presented regarding an escape of
youths ftom another, similar home, and who engaged in a crime spree including
setting a car on fire, burglarizing cars, defecating on a car, shoplifting, and
vandalizing, ¡d. The Court held that the applicant had failed to proyide any
evidence of economic necessity for the increase ftom 8 to 10 residents and, even
if it had, the requested accommodation was not reasonable in light of the City's
legitimate public safety concerns.
In Frazier, the court found that the City of Grand Ledge did not yiolate the FHAA
when it refused to increase the maximum for adult foster care centers ftom 6 to
12. The court noted that the applicant had failed to expressly request a reasonable
accommodation, and therefore the City could not be liable for not having granted
one. Even if an accommodation had been requested, however, the Court
expressed skepticism that the applicant could demonstrate a "necessity" for the
accommodation, noting that the City's zoning ordinance allowed more than 6
residents in multi-family zoned areas. 135 F.Supp.2d at 856.
The Federal Way City Code
The Federal Way City Code does not expressly treat the handicapped differently
based solely on their handicapped status, and therefore would not give rise to a
claim for "differential treatment." Based on the Ninth Circuit's decision in
Gamble, the requisite groups for comparison are other, non-handicapped groups.
See, e.g., Gamble, 104 F-3d at 305 (court compares treatment of Gamble's
application to the treatment of apartment complex, a mobile home park, and a
multistory church); see also, Episcopal Church v. West Valley City, 119
F_Supp.2d at 1220. The definition of "family" in FWCC 22-1 does not
distinguish between the handicapped and non-handicapped; the definition merely
limits a "family" to no more than 5 unrelated persons. Likewise, the Code's
definition of Type II Group Homes are focused on the non-handicapped or those
persons who pose a direct threat to public health or safety and therefore are not
protected by the Act. Thus, the Code itself does not yiolate the FHAA.
10
Likewise, no eyidence, statistical or otherwise, has been presented that Federal
Way's Code has a disparate impact on the handicapped. Consequently, there is
no basis for an FHAA claim on the basis of disparate impact.
As discussed above, howeyer, an applicant may request a "reasonable
accommodation" from otherwise neutral, nondiscriminatory code provisions,
where necessary to afford handicapped persons equal opportunity to use and
enjoy housing. Compass Center requested such an accommodation in its July 13,
2001 letter, for the purpose of providing the supportiye group recoyery
environment under the Oxford House model. Oxford Houses have previously
claimed that at least 8 and sometimes 12 residents are needed for the houses to be
financially and therapeutically yiable.8 City staff reyiewed the request, and
responded that "based on acceptable documentation that Oxford House operates a
residence for persons in recovery and proyides services to these disabled persons,
the residential project would be considered exempt ITom Federal Way land use
processes, procedures, and fees. The number of persons residing in the house
would not be limited by the FWCC definition offamily".see attchment C to
report. This is exactly the type of response required under the FHAA. While
some citizens commenting haye raised the number of police calls for service as a
concern, there is no evidence to date showing that Oxford House residents are
more dangerous than other unrelated persons liying in a single-family zone, or
than if recovering alcoholics or drug addicts were living with relatives in a
"family". See Children's Alliance, 950 F.Supp. at 1499 (rejecting Bellevue City
Attorney's declaring reporting crime statistics). As the Court noted in West
Valley, the "reasonable accommodation" process is intended to be "an interactive
process that requires participation by both parties." West Valley, 119 F.Supp,2d at
1222. This is what occurred when City staff reviewed and responded to the
Compass Center's request for a "reasonable accommodation."
2. What effect does the Washinl!ton Housinl! Policy Act haye on the Oxford House's
request to OCCUDY the Twin Lakes house?
Short answer: Ifthe recent decision of Division III of the Washington Court of
Appeals in Sunderland v. City of Pasco is applied statewide, the Washington
Housing Policy Act prevents a city ITom requiring a proyider of group housing for
disabled or handicapped persons to undergo a special or conditional use pennit
process before being allowed to occupy a single-family house, ifthe city pennits a
"family" to obtain immediate occupancy of a residential structure.
8 David and Gaus, Protecting Group Homes for the Non-Handicapped: Zoning the Post-Edmonds Era,
1999 Zoning and Planning Law Handbook at Section 3.02[2], p. 91; City of Edmonds v. Oxford House,
514 U.S. at 729; Oxford House-C v. St. Louis, 77 F.3d at 252 ("Oxford House's own expert witness
testified Oxford Houses with eight residents can provide significant therapeutic benefits for their
members.").
11
Analysis:
The Legislature adopted the Washington Housing Policy Act ("WHPA") in 1993.
One ofthe WHPA's expressly stated purposes is to "[I]ncrease the supply of
housing for persons with special needs." RCW 43.1 85B.005(2)(e). To that end,
some ofthe Act's stated objectives are to "strengthen public and priyate
institutions that are able to . . .assist very low-income and special needs
households, provide housing for special needs populations,[ and] ensure fair and
equal access to the housing market" RCW 43.1 85B.009(2), (6) and (7).
One of the WHPA's provisions that directly affect cities is RCW 35A.63.240,
which states as follows:
No city may enact or maintain an ordinance, deyelopment regulation,
zoning regulation or official control, policy, or administrative practice
which treats a residential structure occupied by persons with handicaps
differently than a similar residential structure occupied by a family or
other unrelated individuals. As used in this section, "handicaps" are as
defined in the federal fair housing amendments act of 1988 (42 D.S.C.
Sec. 3602).
RCW 35A_63.240. The only reported cases construing this section of the WHPA
are two decisions arising out of a dispute between the City of Pasco and a group
home provider, Sunderland Family Treatment Services.
In the first decision, Sunderland v. Pasco, 127 Wn.2d 782, 903 P.2d 986 (1995)
("Sunderland r), the group home provider argued that the City of Pasco had
discriminated against it by denying a special use permit for a group home for
abused and neglected children proposed to be located in a single-family, low
density zone (R-l). Sunderland argued that some ofthe abused and neglected
children might be handicapped. The Supreme Court disagreed, and held that
abuse and neglect were environmental and cultural factors, not handicaps within
the meaning the FHAA and the WHP A. While those factors might produce
physical or mental effects, those effects did not in every case limit the victim's
participation in major life activities, and thus, abused and neglected children were
not handicapped. Moreover, the City's rejection of the special use permit for
proposed group home was based upon the children's age and family backgrounds,
not on any perceived physical or mental impairment, and thus the denial was not
discriminatory even if the WHPA applied.
The Court did find, however, that the City's denial appeared to rest on
neighborhood opposition to the facility, rather than on competent and substantial
evidence as required by law. Because of the failure of either Sunderland or the
City to create a sufficient record, the Supreme Court remanded the matter to the
City for further proceedings.
12
Following the remand, Sunderland reyised its application to explain that, although
its application was essentially the same, the proposed facility would now be used
to house youths ages 12-17 with a diagnosed mental impairment. The children
would be referred through mental health professions and would haye a diagnosed
mental illness requiring a group setting with 24-hour professional staff
supervision as part of a prescribed treatment plan. The home would not accept
children who posed a danger to themselves or others, children actively using
drugs or alcohol, or children with pending criminal charges. There would be a
one-to-four staff to children ratio, with at least three staff people on duty at all
times, with two staff coming and going every eight hours. Sunderland's property
had an existing, yacant residence that did not require any exterior physical
alterations.
Pasco's Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval.
The City Council, howeyer, held a second public hearing and denied the special
use permit. Before both the Planning Commission and the City Council,
Sunderland argued that the City had no authority to require the SUP. Following
the denial, Sunderland sued, alleging that the denial violated the WHP A and the
FHAA. The superior court agreed, and reversed the City's denial. The City
appealed-
The Court of Appeals, Diyision III, affirmed the reyersal. Sunderland v. Pasco,
107 Wn.App. 109,26 P.3d 955 (Div. 1112001) ("Sunderland /1'). It noted that
the City had required Sunderland to undergo the SUP only because Sunderland's
proposed home was not treated as a "family", in light of the City's code definition
that stated that group homes were not "family" regardless of the number of
occupants. Sunderland II, 107 Wn. App. at 120-121. Thus, the Court held, "the
City violated the WHP A by adopting a regulatory scheme that permitted a
"family" to obtain immediate occupancy of a residential structure but required
"group care facilities" to obtain a SUP before occupying a similar residential
structure." /d. at 122-23- The Court specifically rejected the City's citation to
cases decided under the FHAA in which special or conditional use permits were
allowed. The Court noted that those cases had been decided under the FHAA
reasonable accommodation theory, but the WHP A "does not encompass the
reasonable accommodation analysis." /d. at 124.
The Court also rejected application of a Kansas federal court decision applying
the disparate treatment analysis, noting that while the Kansas' court had held that
intentional discrimination was not shown by use of a special permit process, the
WHPA does not require a showing of intentional discrimination. This holding is
particularly egregious because the WHPA's standard of prohibiting differential
treatment of similarly-situated residential structures is in fact a disparate treatment
standard identical in substance to the FHAA's disparate treatment standard.
Finally, the Sunderland II Court also held that the City's requirement for, and
denial of, a home occupation permit violated the WHPA. Pasco's code required
13
that a home occupation be conducted solely by persons residing within the
dwelling unit on the premises, "subject to the definition of family." Pasco's code
also required that the home occupation be carried on by "family members." The
Court held that these provisions were too restrictive because they limited home
occupation permits only to "families" and discriminated against handicapped
residents not liying in a "family" situation. Id. at 126-28.
The impact of Sunderland Irs holding for Federal Way is uncertain- The City of
Pasco did not seek Supreme Court review of Sunderland 11, so there is no
definitive ruling on this subject in Washington State, and the opinion of a
particular division of the Court of Appeals is technically binding only upon trial
courts within that division. It is "persuasiye authority" in other divisions. This
means that trial courts within Diyision I (in which Federal Way is located) mayor
may not choose to follow Sunderland II.
If Sunderland II is applied on a statewide basis, however, the WHP A would
prohibit Federal Way ITom applying a special use or conditional use permit
process to an applicant seeking to occupy a singe-family home, unless the City
also required a "family" seeking to occupy a similar home to undergo the same
permit process. Under the terms of the August 3, 2001 reasonable
accommodation letter sent to Compass Center, based on acceptable
documentation that Oxford House would operate a residence for disabled persons
in recovery, the City exempted Compass Center ITom "Federal Way land use
processes, procedures, and fees_" The City's reasonable accommodation letter
also noted that "the number of persons residing in the house would not be limited
by the FWCC definition of family." Therefore, assuming for the purposes of
argument that the rule announced in Sunderland II applies on a statewide basis,
the position taken by the City to date complies with RCW 35A.63.240.
3. Mav the City enforce the Twin Lakes Coyenants. Conditions and Restrictions
("CC&Rs")?
Short answer: No. Covenants are essentially contracts, and may only be enforced
by the parties to or beneficiaries of the contract. The City is neither a party to the
CC&Rs nor an owner of property benefited by them. Therefore, it cannot enforce
the CC&Rs.
Analysis:
Covenants, conditions and restrictions, in order to be enforceable, must originate
in a contractual covenant between two or more persons. A landowner cannot by
himself place a running covenant on his own land, for the same reason that one
cannot make a contract with himself. Therefore, enforcement of covenants, at
least as between the original parties, is a matter ofthe law of contract. W.
Stoebuck, Washington Practice Vol. 17, Real Estate Property Law, Section 3.2
14
(1995). The City was not a party to the original contract (i.e., the Declaration of
CC&Rs), and therefore cannot bring an action to enforce them.
Beyond the parties to an original contract of covenants, covenants can "run with
the land," or bind and be enforced by the subsequent purchasers of the land
burdened by the covenants. The doctrine of "running" is analogous to the
contract doctrines of assignment of rights and delegation of duties. It is a doctrine
by which remote parties are bound or benefited by contractual covenants made by
the original parties. While ordinarily a party must consent to assignment or
delegation, the law of running covenants imposes a duty or confers a benefit upon
remote parties not because they consent, but because the covenant bears a
relationship with parcels of land and because the parties have an interest in the
same parcels of land. Rodruck v. Sand Point Maintenance Commission, 48
Wn.2d 565, 295 P.2d 714 (1956); W. Stoebuck, Section 3.2. And, because such
subsequent purchasers are benefited by the CC&Rs that bind them, they are also
entitled to enforce them. As the Twin Lakes CC&Rs Article XII, Section I,
states:
The Trustee, the Association, the Developer and each owner or contract
purchaser of a lot or lots subject to this declaration, shall have the right to
enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions,
covenants, reservations, liens and charges now or hereafter imposed by the
provisions of this declaration....
Here, however, in addition to not being a party to the original contract, the City
also does not haye an interest in any of the Twin Lakes property benefited by the
CC&Rs, and therefore is not entitled to bring an action to enforce them.
Homeowners' associations also may enforce CC&RS. The courts have expanded
upon the idea that because every lot owner is bound to every other owner, the
ability to enforce covenants extends to homeowners' associations that are
contractually bound to obey bylaws. Rodruck, supra; W. Stoebuck, 3.21. Even
under such an expanded analysis, however, the City cannot enforce the CC&Rs,
because it is obviously not the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association, nor a
member.
A recently adopted Washington statute reinforces this conclusion. In 1995, in
order to clarify the role of homeowners' associations, the legislature enacted
RCW 64.38. Homeowners' associations are giyen authority for a yariety of
activities under the statute, including the ability to institute litigation. "Unless
otherwise proyided in the governing documents, an association may... (i]nstitute,
defend, or intervene in litigation or administrative proceedings in its own name on
behalf of itself or two or more owners on matters affecting the homeowners'
association.. .". RCW 64.38.020(4)- The membership of an association under the
statute is limited to "the owners of all real property over which the association has
jurisdiction, both developed and undeyeloped." RCW 64.38.015. The logical
15
conclusion to be drawn ITom the statute's proyision is that the ability to institute
litigation on matters affecting the association belongs to the association itself, as
governed by a membership limited to owners of property within the association's
jurisdiction. Since the City is not an owner of property in Twin Lakes, and is not
the Homeowners' Association, the statute provides additional support for the
conclusion that the City of Federal Way may not enforce the Twin Lakes CC&Rs.
Eyen if the foregoing analysis were not applicable, the City's ability to initiate
litigation is nevertheless goyerned by established authority on the matter of
"standing." "Standing" is a judicial doctrine that limits the availability of judicial
remedies to those particular persons who have sustained a serious enough injury
to warrant the court's attention.
Courts apply a two-part test to determine standing. First, the interest that the
plaintiff seeks to protect must be "arguably within the zone of interests to be
protected or regulated by the statue or constitutional guarantee in question."
Second, the plaintiff must allege an "injury in fact", i. e. that he or she will be
"specifically and perceptibly harmed" by the proposed action. Save A Valuable
Environment v. City of Bothe II, 89 Wn.2d 862, 576 P.2d 401 (1978), at 405, citing
Data Processing Services v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150,152-53,90 S.C!. 827, 830, 25
LEd.2d 184 (1970). "The doctrine of standing generally prohibits a party ITom
asserting another person's rights..." Bunting v. State of Washington, 87 Wn.App.
647,651,943 P.2d 347 (1997).9
Based on this test, it is the individual property owners or the homeowners'
association that would satisfY the requirements for standing, not the City. Only
property owners and the association are within the zone of interests intended to be
protected by the CC&Rs, and only the individual property owners and/or the
homeowners' association can allege an "injury in fact." Since the City is not a
Twin Lakes property owner and not a member of the association, the City would
likely not have standing to pursue enforcement of the Twin Lakes CC&Rs.
4. May the City Pay the Costs of the Homeowners' Liti!!ation to Enforce the
CC&Rs?
Short answer: No. The City's payment oflitigation costs of private parties
seeking to enforce priyate CC&Rs would be an unconstitutional gift of public
funds or constitute an unlawful lending of credit.
, Although the City generally has standing to enforce the rights of its citizens (see, e.g., Boilermakers
Local 104 v. International Bhd. Of Boilermakers, 33 Wn.2d I, 203 P.2d 1019 (1949», the doctrine
described in Bunting would likely prevent the City ITom enforcing the rights of a limited class of citizens
accorded by virtue of those citizens' private real estate transactions.
16
Analysis:
Article 8, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution states that:
No county, city, town or other municipal corporation shall hereafter giye any
money, or property, or loan its money, or credit to or in aid of any individual,
association, company or corporation, except for the necessary support of the poor
and infirm- . . .
This prohibition is mandatory, and must be strictly observed. Washington
Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility Dist. No. I ofSnohomish County, 77 Wn.2d 94,
459 P_2d 633 (1969). Its purpose is to preyent state funds from being used to
benefit private interests where the public interest is not primarily being served.
CLEANv. State, 130 Wn.2d 782,928 P.2d 1054 (1996). This proyision is
violated where there is a transfer of property or money without consideration and
with donatiye intent. Louthan v. King County, 94 Wn.2d 422,617 P.2d 977
(1980). Under a two-pronged test recently adopted by the Supreme Court, the
first question is whether the funds are being expended to carry out a fundamentaJ
purpose of government. If so, then no gift of public funds has occurred; if not, the
court then focuses on the adequacy of the consideration receiyed and the donative
intent of the appropriating body. CLEANv. City of Spokane, 133 Wn.2d 455, 947
P.2d 1169 (1997, cert. denied, 119 S.ct.45, 525 U.S. 812, 142 L.Ed.2d 35.
Under this constitutional provision, the use of municipal bonds to finance water
pollution control facilities for private, industrial corporations was
unconstitutional, because money obtained through the sale of municipal bonds
was essentially loaned directly to the private corporations to enable them to
purchase the water pollution control facilities. Port of Longview v. Taxpayers, 85
Wn.2d 216,527 P.2d 263 (1974), rehearing denied, 533 P.2d 128 (1975).
Likewise, a city's purchase of property with the intent to resell it to a private
deyeloper is a loan of credit in violation of this constitutional proyision. Lassila
v. Wenatchee, 89 Wn.2d 804, 576 P.2d 54 (1978).
If the City were to pay a private parties' litigation costs (either indiyidual property
owners or the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association) to enforce the
Association's private covenants, it would likely be an unconstitutional gift of
public funds or lending of credit. The enforcement of private covenants is not a
fundamental purpose of government. The City would not receive any
consideration in return for payment of the litigation costs, and would likely be
held to have "donative intent" in providing the funds to the property owners or the
homeowners' association. Accordingly, the City may not fund litigation to
enforce the Twin Lakes' CC&Rs.
17
5. Is the City vrohibited bv the CC&Rs from avvroviul! uses that mil!ht violate the
CC&Rs?
Short answer: No. The CC&Rs are not binding on the City in its land use
decisions.
Analysis:
One citizen inquired via email as to the City's duty to refrain from approying
uses, such as the Oxford House, when such a use might yiolate private CC&Rs-
As stated by the citizen:
What should the responsibility ofthe City be to ensuring that their actions
do not violate the laws of a subordinate community? The Federal
Government does not force the subordinate State Goyernments to give up
their laws just because they are more strict, instead they allow laws that
add to the strictness as long as they do not violate the superior law.
Email from Sean Marshall to David Moseley, January 4, 2002.
Mr. Marshall's analogy to the "Federal Government" notwithstanding, this is not
a situation involving "preemption," in which a superior government body may
expressly prevent an inferior goyernment body from enforcing its laws. The Twin
Lakes Homeowners' Association is not a goyernment body, but rather is a priyate
association charged with enforcing private covenants or contracts among its
property owner members. The City's codes and regulations constitute the
applicable law on local zoning matters within the City's borders and are not
affected by private agreements such as CC&Rs. Ifthe answer were otherwise,
uniform enforcement of City codes would be impossible because permissible uses
under the zoning code would vary from subdivision to subdivision.
This does not mean that individual homeowners may not enforce their own
private CC&Rs against each other. Just as the federal goyernment generally does
not prevent cities from adopting and enforcing different zoning codes, the City of
Federal Way does not prevent individual homeowner associations from adopting
or enforcing different CC&Rs. Enforcement of the priyate CC&Rs, however, is a
private matter, as discussed above, and is not something in which the City may
become involved.
This is analogous to the situation that faced the City of Federal Way with respect
to an application for a building permit by Dayid Thorstad to build a single-family
home on what essentially was a cul-de-sac island in the Marine Hills West
subdiyision. After determining that the particular property was a legal building
lot, the City issued the building permit for the house. Adjacent property owners,
howeyer, believed that the property was not a "lot" within the meaning of their
local CC&Rs and brought suit to enjoin construction. The trial court agreed and
18
granted declaratory relief. Thorstad v. Federal Way Water and Sewer District, 73
Wn.App. 638,639,870 P_2d 1046 (Div. 11994). Mr. Thorstad appealed and
eventually obtained a decision ITom the Court of Appeals that 1/3 of his property
was bound by the CC&Rs but the other 2/3 was not. ¡d. While the trial court's
decision remained in effect, howeyer, the property owner could not legally
proceed with construction, even though the City had issued a building permit that
would otherwise authorize construction-
The situation here is the same. While the City may issue a decision or permit
authorizing a land use or remodeling of a home, the property remains subject to
applicable covenants governing the property. The City's decisions will not
prevent the homeowners ftom pursuing enforcement of the Twin Lakes CC&Rs.
6. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a home occupation land use
approyal prior to occupyinl! the Twin Lakes house?
Short answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not
fit the definition of home occupation under the FWCc. Therefore, no home
occupation land use approval may be required.
Analysis:
A "home occupation" as defined in the FWCC means "an occupation, enterprise,
activity or profession which is incidental to a residential use, which is carried on
for profit or customarily carried on for profit and which is not an otherwise
permitted use in the zone in which it occurs." FWCC 22-1. "Residential use", by
contrast, is defined as "developments and occupancy in which persons sleep and
prepare food, other than deyelopments used for transient occupancy." FWCC 22-
I. Oxford House proposes that its tenants will use the Twin Lakes home for
sleeping, preparing food and other activities normally associated with residential
use, on other than a transient basis. If true, this use would not be a "home
occupation," because the use would be residential rather than an "occupation,
enterprise, actiyity or profession which is incidental to a residential use."
Even if the proposed use met the definition of a "home occupation," because
Oxford House does not propose to have paid employees working in the house, and
no actiyities carried on for profit within the house no additional reyiew is required
for the facility under the home occupation sections of the code. FWCC 22-22-
1066 et.seq.
7. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a business license prior to
occupyinl! the Twin Lakes house?
Short answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not
fit the definition of business under the FWCC.
19
Analysis:
FWCC 9-29 states that "[n]o person shall transact, engage in or carry on any
business, trade, profession, occupation, calling or activity without first having
been issued a proper and current registration or having filed and qualified for an
exemption as provided herein. FWCC 9-29. The definition of both "business"
and "small business" in FWCC 9-26 requires employment of persons for private
profit or benefit. Since none of the residents of Oxford House are employees
working for private profit or benefit, the use of the property does not qualify as a
business under the FWCC. Additionally, since the only activities proposed to be
carried on at the property are residential activities, as opposed to "a trade,
profession, occupation, calling or activity," a business registration would not be
required under FWCC 9-26 et. seq.
8. Mav the City withdraw or modify its decision to orovide Commnnity
Develooment Block Grant fundin!! to the Como ass Center?
Short answer: No.
Analysis:
As discussed above, the contract funds have already been disbursed to Compass
Center by King County, which administers the City's CDBG funds through the
Consortium-
Second, the contract between King County and the Compass Center provides that
the contract may be terminated by the County for convenience or cause. It also
states, however, that Compass Center is required to return funds only if a
termination results ITom the acts or omissions by Compass Center, including
misappropriation, nonperformance of required services or fiscal mismanagement.
Even in that event, only those funds that were misappropriated or that are
"unexpended" by Compass Center need be returned. Under the facts as we
currently understand them, there would be no basis for a termination for cause,
and even if so, no basis by which to demand return of the $20,000.
Finally, withdrawal of funding at this point, in response to neighborhood
opposition to housing for disabled, could be held to be discrimination in violation
ofthe FHAA.
9. Is the Compass Center. Oxford House. or the City financially liable for the
activity of the Twin Lakes house residents?
Short answer: The City cannot proyide a legal opinion as to the rights of Twin
Lakes homeowners against third parties (i.e., Compass Center or the Oxford
House). The City would not be liable, because it is protected from suit for its land
use permitting actions by the public duty doctrine.
20
Analysis:
Under Washington case law, an exception to the common law rule that one has no
duty to prevent a third party from causing harm to another may be found where a
"special relationship" with either the victim or the criminal exists. Hertog v. City
a/Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265,979 P.2d 400 (1999), citing Petersen v. State, 100
Wn.2d 421, 671 P.2d 230 (1983). In Hertog, the Court found a special
relationship existed between the City, its probation counselors and municipal
court probationers and that the City and counselors had a duty to control
probationers to protect others ITom reasonably foreseeable harm resulting ITom
the probationers' dangerous propensities. Hertog, at 281. Because the City has
not taken on the responsibility for supervision and will not be providing any in-
home care, there is no "special relationship", and consequently no liability. And,
under the Public Duty Doctrine, approval of a development alone is insufficient to
giye rise to liability on the part of a municipality. Phillips v. King County, 136
Wn.2d 946, 968 P.2d 871 (1998).
10. If the City may not take any action concernin2 the Oxford House's proposal to
OCCUpy the Twin Lakes house. what options (if any) does the City Council have with
respect to any future Oxford House or other 2roup home applications?
Short answer: The City Council may consider adoption of code amendments to
regulate future group housing applications, but any amendments must be carefully
tailored to ayoid discrimination in yiolation of the FHAA or the WHP A.
Analvsis:
The City might consider several different types of code amendments. First, the
Council could adopt a process specifically for consideration of "reasonable
accommodation" requests under the Fair Housing AInendments Act. The Joint
Statement by the Departments of Justice and Housing and Urban Development
indicates that if a local zoning scheme specifies procedures for seeking a
departure ITom the general rule, "these procedures must ordinarily be followed."
Joint Statement at 3. If no procedure is specified, persons with disabilities or a
proyider for them may neyertheless request a reasonable accommodation. ¡d.
The Joint Statement, along with the analysis giyen the reasonable accommodation
issue by recent court decisions, suggests that the City could institute a formal
procedure for consideration of "reasonable accommodation" requests. This
procedure could include some type of public notice and/or the opportunity for
public comment.
Likewise, the Council could adopt code amendments defining a Type I Group
Home, identifying the zones in which they are permitted, and specifying the
procedure for review of any needed approyals. Such amendments would require
careful tailoring, as well as evidentiary support, as previous efforts by other cities
21
haye been found to be discriminatory on their face. See, e.g., Children's Alliance
v. Bellevue, 950 F.Supp. at 1497. Permit requirements per se are not
unreasonable, e.g., Turning Point v. Caldwell, especially when nondiscriminatory
and directed to consideration of impacts that eyidence indicates may arise from
the types of use at issue. These could include traffic, parking and, given sufficient
eyidence, secondary effects such as increased crime. Careful consideration
should also be giyen to the Washington Housing Policy Act so as not to
improperly differentiate between housing for the handicapped, on the one hand,
and housing for families or other unrelated persons, on the other.
KIOxford Houseldocumentsllegalmemo
22
Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD
Pagelof5
JOINT STATEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
GROUP HOMES, LOCAL LAND USE, AND THE FAIR HOUSING ACT
Since the federal Fair Housing Act ("the Act") was amended by Congress in 1988 to add protections fot petsons with
disabilities and families with children, there has been a great deal of litigation concerning the Act's effect on the ability of
local governments to exercise control over group living arrangements, particularly for persons with disabilities. The
Department of Justice has taken an active part in much of this litigation, often following referral of a matter by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). This joint statement provides an overview of the Fair Housing
Act's requirements in this area. Specific topics are addressed in more depth in the attached Questions and Answers.
The Fair Housing Act prohibits a broad range of practices that discriminate against individuals on the basis of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, familial status, and disability.lU The Act does not pre-empt local zoning laws. However, the
Act applies to municipalities and other local government entities and prohibits them from making zoning or land use
decisions or implementing land use policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against protected persons, including
individuals with disabilities.
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful --
. To utilize land use policies or actions that treat groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of
non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for persons with disabilities or a
specific type of disability, such as mental illness, from locating in a particular area, while allowing other groups of
unrelated individuals to live together in that area.
. To take action against, or deny a permit, for a home because of the disability of individuals who live or would live
there. An example would be denying a building permit for a home because it was intended to provide housing for
persons with mental retardation.
. To refuse to make reasonable accommodations in land use and zoning policies and procedures where such
accommodations may be necessary to afford persons or groups of persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to
use and enjoy housing.
. What constitutes a reasonable accommodation is a case-by-case determination.
. Not all requested modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. If a requested modification imposes an undue
financial or administrative burden on a local government, or if a modification creates a fundamental alteration in a
local government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
The disability discrimination provisions of the Fair Housing Act do not extend to persons who claim to be disabled solely
on the basis of having been adjudicated a juvenile delinquent, having a criminal record, Ot being a sex offender.
Furthermore, the Fair Housing Act does not protect persons who currently use illegal drugs, persons who have been
convicted ofihe manufactute Ot sale of illegal drugs, or persons with or without disabilities who present a direct threat to
the persons or property 'of others.
HUD and the Department of Justice encourage parties to group home disputes to explore all reasonable dispute resolution
procedures, like mediation, as alternatives to litigation.
DATE: AUGUST 18, 1999
Questions and Answers
on the Fair Housing Act and Zoning
Q. Does the Fair Housing Act pre-emp! local zoning laws?
No. "Pre-emption" is a legal term meaning that one level of government has taken over a field and left no room for
hup:llwwwllsdoj.gov/crtihousing/lìnaI8_I.htm
1/3/2002
Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD
Page 2 of 5
government at any other level to pass laws or exercise authority in that area. The Fair Housing Act is not a land use or
zoning statute; it does not pre-empt local land use and zoning laws. This is an area where state law typically gives local
governments primary power. However, if that power is exercised in a specific instance in a way that is inconsistent with a
fedemllaw such as the Fair Housing Act, the federal law will control. Long before the 1988 amendments, the courts had
held that the Fair Housing Act prohibited local governments from exercising their land use and zoning powers in a
discriminatory way.
Q. What is a group home within the meaning of the Fair Housing Act?
The term "group home" does not have a specific legal meaning. In this statement, the term "group home" tefers to housing
occupied by groups of unrelated individuals with disabilities.{:!) Sometimes. but not always. housing is provided by
organizations that also offer various services for individuals with disabilities living in the group homes. Sometimes it is
this group home operator. rather than the individuals who live in the home. that interacts with local government in seeking
permits and making requests for reasonable accommodations on behalf of those individuals.
The term "group home" is also sometimes applied to any group of unrelated persons who live together in a dwelling--
such as a group of students who voluntarily agree to share the rent on a house. The Act does not generally affect the
ability of local governments to regulate housing of this kind, as long as they do not discriminate against the residents on
the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, handicap (disability) or familial status (families with minor
children).
Q. Who are persons with disabilities within the meaning of the Fair Housing Act?
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap. "Handicap" has the same legal meaning as the
term "disability" which is used in other federal civil rights laws. Persons with disabilities (handicaps) are individuals with
mental or physical impairments which substantially limit one or more major life activities. The tenn mental or physical
impairment may include conditions such as blindness. hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection, mental
retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic fatigue, learning disability, head injury, and mental illness. The term
major life activity may include seeing, heating, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks, caring fot one's self,
learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also protects persons who have a record of such an impairment, or
are regarded as having such an impairment.
Current users vI' illegal controlled substances, persons convicted for illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled
substance, sex offenders, and juvenile offenders, are not considered disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that
status.
The Fair Housing Act affords no protections to individuals with or without disabilities who present a direct threat to the
persons or property of others. Determining whether someone poses such a direct threat must be made on an individualized
basis, however, and cannot be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability.
Q. What kinds of local zoning and land use laws relating to group homes violate the Fair Housing Act?
Local zoning and land use laws that treat groups of unrelated petsons with disabilities less favorably than similar groups
of unrelated persons without disabilities violate the Fair Housing Act. For example, suppose a city's zoning ordinance
defines a "family" to include up to six unrelated persons living together as a household unit. and gives such a group of
unrelated persons the right to live in any zoning district without special permission. If that ordinance also disallows a
group home for six or fewer people with disabilities in a certain district or requires this home to seek a use permit, such
requirements would conflict with the Fair Housing Act. The ordinance treats persons with disabilities worse than persons
without disabilities.
A local government may genetally restrict the ability of groups of unrelated persons to live together as long as the
restrictions are imposed on all such groups. Thus. inthe case where a family is defined to include up to six unrelated
people, an ordinance would not, on its face, violate the Act if a group home for seven people with disabilities was not
allowed to locate in a single family zoned neighborhood, because a group of seven unrelated people without disabilities
would also be disallowed. However, as discussed below, because persons with disabilities are also entitled to request
reasonable accommodations in /Ules and policies, the group home for seven persons with disabilities would have to be
given the opportunity to seek an exception or waiver. If the criteria for reasonable accommodation are met, the permit
11I11':!/WWw.usdo.gov/crt/holising/lïnaIX_I.htlll
1/3/2001
Joinl Statement of DOJ and HUD
Page 3 of 5
would have to be given in that instance, but the ordinance would not be invalid in all circumstances.
Q. What is a reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Act?
As a general rule, the Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to tefuse to make "reasonable accommodations" (modifications
or exceptions) to rules, policies, practices, Ot services. when such accommodations may be necessary to afford persons
with disabilities an equal opportunity to use or enjoy a dwelling.
Even though a zoning ordinance imposes on group homes the same restrictions it imposes on other groups of unrelated
people, a local government may be required, in individual cases and when requested to do so, to grant a reasonable
accommodation to a group home for persons with disabilities. For example, it may be a reasonable accommodation to
waive a setback requirement so that a paved path of travel can be provided 10 residents who have mobility impairments. A
similar waivet might not be required for a different type of group home where residents do not have difficulty negotiating
steps and do not need a setback in order to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.
Not all requested modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. Whether a particular accommodation is reasonable
depends on the facts, and must be decided on a case-by.case basis. The determination of what is reasonable depends on
the answers to two questions: First, does the tequest impose an undue burden or expense on the local government?
Second, does the proposed use create a fundamental alteration in the zoning scheme? If the answer to either question is
"yes," the tequested accommodation is unteasonable.
What is "reasonable" in one circumstance may not be "reasonable" in another. For example, suppose a local government
does not allow groups of four or more unrelated people to live together in a single-family neighborhood. A group home
for four adults with mental retardation would very likely be able to show that it will have no more impact on parking,
ttaffic, noise, utility use, and other typical concerns of zoning than an "Ofdinary family." In this circumstance, there would
be no undue burden Of expense for the local government nor would the single-family character of the neighborhood be
fundamentally altered. Granting an exception or waiver to the group home in this circumstance does not invalidate the
ordinance. The local government would still be able to keep groups of unrelated persons without disabilities from living in
single-family neighborhoods.
By contrast, a fifty-bed nursing home would not ordinarily be considered an appropriate use in a single-family
neighborhood, for obvious teasons having nothing to do with the disabilities of its residents. Such a facility might or might
not impose significant burdens and expense on the community, but it would likely create a fundamental change in the
single-family character of the neighborhood. On the other hand, a nursing home might not create a "fundamental change"
in a neighborhood zoned for multi-family housing. The scope and magnitude of the modification requested, and the
features of the surrounding neighborhood are among the factors that will be taken into account in determining whether a
requested accommodation is reasonable.
Q. What is the procedure for requesting a reasonable accommodation?
Where a local zoning scheme specifies procedures fot seeking a departure from the general rule, courts have decided, and
the Departml'nt of Justice and HUD agree, that these procedures must Ofdinarily be followed. If no procedure is specified,
persons with disabilities may, nevertheless, request a reasonable accommodation in some other way, and a local
government is obligated to gran I it if it meets the criteria discussed above. A local government's failure to respond to a
request for reasonable accommodation or an inordinate delay in responding could also violate the Act.
Whether a procedure for requesting accommodations is provided or not, if local government officials have previously
made statements or otherwise indicated that an application would not receive fair consideration, Of if the procedure itself
is discriminatOfY, then individuals with disabilities living in a group home (and/or its operator) might be able to go
directly into court to request an order for an accommodation.
Local governments are encouraged to provide mechanisms for requesting reasonable accommodations that operate
promptly and efficiently, without imposing significant costs or delays. The local government should also make efforts to
insure that the availability' of such mechanisms is well known within the community.
Q. When, if ever, can a local government limit the number of group homes that can locate in a certain area?
http://www.usdoj.govlcrt/housìngllinaI8_I.htm
113/2002
Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD
Page 4 of 5
A concern expressed by some local government officials and neighborhood tesidents is that certain jurisdictions,
governments, or particular neighborhoods within a jurisdiction, may come to have more than theit "fair share" of group
homes. Thete are legal ways to address this concern. The Fair Housing Act does not prohibit most governmental programs
designed to encourage people of a particular race to move to neighborhoods occupied ptedominantly by people of another
race. A local government that believes a particular atea within its boundaries has its "fair share" of group homes, could
offer incentives to providers to locate future homes in other neighborhoods.
However, some state and local governments have tried to address this concern by enacting laws requiring that group
homes be at a certain minimum distance from one another. The Department of Justice and HUD take the position, and
most COUtts that have addressed the issue agree, that density restrictions are generally inconsistent with the Fair Housing
Act. We also believe, however, that if a neighborhood came to be composed largely of group homes, that could adversely
affect individuals with disabilities and would be inconsistent with the objective of integrating persons with disabilities into
the community. Especially in the licensing and regulatory process, it is appropriate to be concerned about the setting for a
group home. A consideration of over-concentration could be considered in this context. This objective does not, however,
justify requiring separations which have the effect of foreclosing group homes from locating in entire neighborhoods.
Q. What kinds of health and safety regulations can be imposed upon group homes?
The great majority of group homes for persons with disabilities are subject to state regulations intended to protect the
health and safety of theit residents. The Department of Justice and HUD believe, as do responsible group home operators,
that such licensing schemes are necessary and legitimate. Neighbors who have concerns that a particular group home is
being operated inappropriately should be able to bring theit concerns to the attention of the responsible licensing agency.
We encourage the states
to commit the resources needed to make these systems responsive to tesident and community needs and concerns.
Regulation and licensing requirements for group homes are themselves subject to scrutiny undet the Fait Housing Act.
Such requirements based on health and safety concerns can be discriminatory themselves or may be cited sometimes to
disguise discriminatory motives behind attempts to exclude group homes from a community. Regulators must also
recognize that not all individuals with disabilities living in group home settings desire or need the same level of services
or protection. For example, it may be appropriate to require heightened fire safety measures in a group home for people
who are unable to move about without assistance. But fot another group of persons with disabilities who do not desire or
need such assistance, it would not be appropriate to require fire safety measures beyond those normally imposed on the
size and type of residential building involved.
Q. Can a local government consider the feelings of neighbors in making a decision about granting a permit to a
group home to locate in a residential neighborhood?
In the same way a local government would break the law if it rejected low-income housing in a community because of
neighbors' fears that such housing would be occupied by racial minorities, a local government can violate the Fait Housing
Act if it blocþ a group home or denies a requested reasonable accommodation in tesponse to neighbors' stereotypical
fears Ot prejudices about persons with disabilities. This is so even if the individual government decision-makers are not
themselves personally prejudiced against persons with disabilities. If the evidence shows that the decision-makers wete
responding to the wishes of theit constituents, and that the constituents were motivated in substantial part by
discriminatory concerns, that could be enough to prove a violation.
Of course, a city councilor zoning board is not bound by everything that is said by every person who speaks out at a
public hearing. It is the record as a whole that will be determinative. If the record shows that there were valid reasons for
denying an application that wete not telated. to the disability of the prospective residents, the courts will give little weight
to isolated discriminatory statements. If, however, the putportedly legitimate reasons advanced to support the action are
not objectively valid, the courts are likely to treat them as ptetextual, and to find that there has been discrimination.
For example, neighbors and local government officials may be legitimately concerned that a group home for adults in
certain circumstances may create more demand for on,street parking than would a typical family. It is not a violation of
the Fair Housing Act for neighbors or officials to raise this concern and to ask the provider to respond. A valid
unaddressed concern about inadequate parking facilities could justify denying the application, if anothet type of facility
http://www.usdoj.gov/crtlhousing/finaI8_I.htm
1/312002
Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD
PageS of 5
would ordinarily be denied a permit for such parking problems. However, if a group of individuals with disabilities or a
group home operator shows by credible and unrebutted evidence that the home will not create a need for more parking
spaces, or submits a plan to provide whatever off-street parking may be needed. then parking concerns would not support
a decision to deny the home a petmit.
Q. What is the status of group living arrangements for children under the Fair Housing Act?
In the course of litigation addressing group homes for persons with disabilities, the issue has arisen whether the Fair
Housing Act also provides protections for group living arrangements for children. Such living arrangements ate covered
by the Fait Housing Act's provisions prohibiting discrimination against families with children. For example. a local
government may not enforce a zoning ordinance which treats group living arrangements for children less favorably than it
treats a similar group living arrangement for unrelated adults. Thus. an ordinance that defined a group of up to six
unrelated adult persons as a family, but specifically disallowed a group living arrangement for six or fewer children,
would. on its face. discriminate on the basis of familial status. Likewise. a local government might violate the Act if it
denied a permit to such a home because neighbors did not want to have a group facility for children next to them.
The law generally recognizes that children require adult supervision. Imposing a reasonable requirement for adequate
supervision in group living facilities for childten would not violate the familial status provisions of the Fair Housing Act.
Q. How are zoning and land use matters handled by HUD and the Department of Justice?
The Fair Housing Act gives the Department of Housing and Urban Development the power to receive and investigate
complaints of discrimination. including complaints that a local government has discriminated in exercising its land use
and zoning powers. HUD is also obligated by statute to attempt to conciliate the complaints that it teceives, even before it
completes an investigation.
In matters involving zoning and land use, HUD does not issue a charge of discrimination. Instead, HUD refers matters it
believes may be metitorious to the Department of Justice which, in its discretion, may decide to bring suit against the
respondent in such a case. The Department of Justice may also bring suit in a case that has not been the subject of a HUD
complaint by exercising its power to initiate litigation alleging a "pattern or practice" of discrimination or a denial of
rights to a group of persons which taises an issue of general public importance.
The Department of Justice's principal objective in a suit of this kind is to remove significant barriers to the housing
opportunities available for persons with disabilities. The Department ordinarily will not participate in litigation to
challenge discriminatory ordinances which are not being enforced, unless there is evidence that the mere existence of the
provisions are preventing or discouraging the development of needed housing.
If HUD determines that there is no reasonable basis to believe that thete may be a violation, it will close an investigation
without referring the :natter to the Department of Justice. Although the Department of Justice would still have independent
"pattern or practice" authority to take enforcement action in the matter that was the subject of the closed HUD
investigation, that would be an unlikely event. A HUD or Department of Justice decision not to proceed with a zoning or
land use mailer does not foreclose private plaintiffs from pursuing a claim.
Litigation can be an expensive. time-consuming, and uncertain process for all parties. HUD and the Department of Justice
encourage parties to group home disputes to explore all reasonable alternatives to litigation, including alternative dispute
resolution procedures. like mediation. HUD attempts to conciliate all Fair Housing Act complaints that it receives. In
addition, it is the Department of Justice's policy to offer prospective defendants the opportunity to engage in pre-suit
settlement negotiations. except in the most unusual circumstances.
I. The Fair Housing Act uses the term "handicap." This document uses the term "disability" which has exactly the same
legal meaning.
2, There are groups of unrelated persons with disabilities who choose to live together who do not considet their living
arrangements "group homes." and it is inappropriate to consider them "group homes" as that concept is discussed in this
statement.
http://www.lIsdoj.gov/crt/housing/linaI8_I.htm
1/3/2002
. .
KING COUNTY CDBG CONSORTIUM
2001 CDBG Pass-through City ~roject Application
1. Project Number and Title:
6. Oxford House Transitional Housing
2. Project Location (street address and jurisdiction):
Yet to be determined. Somewhere in South King County.
3. Project Summary:
The Compass Center and Oxford Houses of Washington will partner, using 2001
CDBG Pass-through funds, to purchase and rehabilitate one single family home at a
site yet to be determined in South King County. This award will be applied to the
acquisition costs of the overall project. The project will act as transitional housing
for at least eight individuals in recovery from drug and alcohol addiction.
As a site has not located, it is not possible to determine if the project will meet the
criteria of the ESA Section 7 No Effects Checklist. However, this award is made for
acquisition, which is on the checklist. Therefore, should the project require ESA
review, the funds for review would be from a different revenue source.
4. National Objective
A. Citation
Low /Mod Income Housing
208(a)(3) Housing Activity
B. Explanation (attach required documentationlrecords)
Housing units will be occupied primarily by low- and moderate-income individuals.
5. Eligible Activity (This is a menu of common activities - please keep the
applicable citation and delete the rest)
202 Rehabilitation
6. Subrecipient
Compass Center
77 Washington Street
Seattle, WA 98104
Contact: Mary Burki, King County HCD, (206) 296-8697
Page 1
7. Line Item Budget
Personnel Services (detail below) $
Office or Operating Supplies $
Consultant or Purchased Services $
Construction Contracts $
Communications $
Travel and Training $
Other (specify below):
Property Acquisition $20,000
Total Pass-through City Funds: $20,000
8. Personnel Detail
N/A
9. Accomplishments
Acquisition Project Schedule
Task Projected
Completion
Date
Comolete environmental review
Purchase and Sale Aoreement executed Februarv 2001
Aoora/sal complete Februarv 2001
Build/no Insoection comolete Februarv 2001
Hazardous Material Assessment comolete Februarv 2001
Closina March 2001
Page 2
OXFORD HO
ASHINGTON
April 25,2000
THOMAS M. DUGAN
mEASURER, OXr-oRD HOUSE INCj
STATE OF WASHINGTON REPRESÉNT~.T1VE
",~ F~ r.-;¡ [<ò n \;:~ 1<: r:\
'i U: . h1 ..r:; ¡; ," I!; ¡[Ii
I' .."
! í APQ? 6 7"00 i 1i L
'I ., ,1.1. !i'I'
!-'I
¡By ---. --------1
Cameron Parker, CDBG Coordinator
GtyofFederai Way
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
Dear Mr. Parker:
On behalf of Oxford House, Inc. and the State of Washington's Division of Alcoholism and
Substance Abuse Services (DASAS) I 'Want to express my excitement about the prospect of
partnering with the King Omnty Housing Authority (K. ŒIA) to create new Oxford Houses in King
County.
Omently there are 15 Oxford Houses in King County. All of these houses operate under
lease agreements with private landlords. The fIrSt house was created in 1990. The last house
opened in King Countyin 1998. As you might imagine, the housing market in King County is
rapialy pricing Oxford Houses out of the market. It is also becoming increasingly difficult to renew
leases on the existing houses at rates affordable to the residents. Oxford House is not interested in
owning propettysothe linkage with the KŒIA forms a natural partnership where the Authority
owns the propetty and Oxford House leases th1 struCtUre and operates the program. Both parties
do what they know best. ~ow Con'lfass ~
Throughout the State of Washington Oxford House provides a clean and sober, supportive
living environment for over 600 persons in ~overy. Over 80% of the persons who enter an
Oxford House remain clean andsober during their residency at the house. The average stay for men
is 12 months and for women 9 months. The Oxford House, Inc. program is a recognized leader in
the field of substance abuse, not only in WaShington but also nationally. Afonnula for success has
evolved over the past 20 years. The program's focus is that of self-management. Participation in
management and operation of a house is a requirement of residency and a willingness to do so is a
key ingredient for admission to a house.
As an Outreach Worker, paid by the süte's DASAS program, my job is to develop new
Oxford Houses throughout the State of Washington and to nurtUre those that have been created. I
look forward to this new partnership with public funders and the KŒA as we all focus on the goal
of deyeloping clean and sober housing for persons in recovery.
~~ ir-
~om Dugan
'-::'-~Â:'-(
~~~
THE COMPASS CENTER
A Lutheran Otganization
.:-.
Board of Directors
Shari Bltcon
Verlon Brown
Marty Dasler
Mike Halvorson
Cheryl Hart
Stacy Kern
Kacey Kroeger
Julie Lightfoot
Ron H. Lynch
Stephen Nelson
DeMar Sathe<
Joseph Sidbury
Heather Simmons
John Sinkula
Ed Stemple
PelerSIrucI<
Thao rled1
Paul Winterstein
Rick Friedhoff
Executtve Director
77 S. Washington Street
Seattle. Washington 98104
(206) 461-7835
Fax (206) 461-3874
c
RECEIVED BY .
MU'" ,...-v ~';VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JUL 13 2001
~O{-IOd.~JO-OÙ
..."",'. '.'"
July 13, 2001
Ms. Kathy McOung
Director
Community Devdopment Services
Gty of Federal Way
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
RE:
Compass Center/OxfDrd House home for persons in recovery
Dear Ms- McOung:
The purpose of this cotTeSpondence is to seek a letter of detenninat:ion that the
proposed use for a single family home in the Gty of Federal Way is permitted under the City of
Federal Way's Muniåpal Code, Section 22.1. Definitions: Family.
Family means an individual or two or more individuals related by not more than four
degrees of affinity or consanguinity and including persons under legal guardianship, or a
group of not more than five persons who are not related by four degrees or fewer
degrees of affinity or consanguinity; provided, however that any limitation on the
number of residents resulting from this definition shall not be applied if it prohibits the
city from making reasonable accommodations to disabled persons in order to afford
such persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling a required by the Fair
HousWgActof 1988, 42USC3604 (f) (3) (b).
The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1988 defines a "disabled person" in Section 802 (h)
[42USC3601] as follows:
"Handicap" means, with respect to a person-
(1) a physical or mental impairment wlùch substantially limits one or more of such
person's major life activities, .
(2) a record of having such an impairment, or
(3) being regarded as having such an impairment, but such term does not include
current, illegal use of!;!r addiction to a controlled substance (as defined in section
102 of the controlled Substances Act (21 use 802»-
There are numerous examples of case lawwere "person in recoverý' have been
detennined to meet the definition of "handicap" under the Fair Housing Act of 1988. Based on
this history-, both The Compass Center and Oxford House believe that their proposed use of a
single family house in the Stone Brook neighborhood of Federal Way meet the Gty's definition
of "Family" and is therefore a permitted use.
The Compass Center is a nonprofit organization that provides housing to low-income
families and individuals. They have been providing services for over 80 years and own and! or
operate 10 facilities serving 165 families or individuals. Their CWTent annual operating budget is
just over $2.8 million.
.
A'-""dWa"""""
.' : - .
(-
(
Oxford House is a nonprofit organization that is dedicated to providing housing to persons in
recovety. They have been providing housing for 26 years. In King County, Oxford House leases 16 houses
?,at serve about 130 persons in recovety. StateWide;Oxford House leases 89 houses that serve 700 persons
III recovety.
The Gtyof Federal Wrr¡, along with King County and the State of Washington, has allocated funding
for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a single-family house for the pwpose of housing persons in recovety.
Federal Wrr¡ awarded the project $20,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds in 2000.
The Compass Center intends to purchase a single-family house that is zoned RS, residential, single
family (most likely RS9.6) and lease the hone to Oxford House for use as housing for up to eight persons in
recovety. The Oxford House model is one of self-management where residents take responsibility for
management of the house (paying bills, keeping the house and yard clean and tidy, undertaking minor
maintenance tasks, selecting new residents). Residents also take responsibility for peer support and encourage
fellow residents to seek the assistance they need to remain clean and sober. Residents who fail to remain
clean and sober are asked to leave the house. StateWide, over 80% of Oxford House residents remain clean
and sober while in residence at one of the homes.
The eight residents of the house will meet weekly to discuss household chores, money matters like
rent and bills, and issues related to maintenance of sobriety. "Officers" of the house will meet montbJy with
officers from other Oxford Houses at "chapter" meetings to discuss overall operating of each house in the
chapter. Typically, a chapter is comprised of nine or ten Oxford Houses located in the same general area.
The Federal Wrr¡ house will join a chapter of nine Oxford Houses in northern Pierce County.
As the landlord, Compass Center will be responsible for major repairs and maintenance matters, and
will manage the replacement reserve account. We are committed to the long -term life of the house and
property and will maintain such in top condition.
For building emergencies, residents will contact The Compass Center via a 24-hour phone number.
For housing operations emergencies, residents can contact an Oxford House outreach worker via a 24-hour
phone number.
The Compass Center and Oxford House are proud of housing opportunities they provide for
persons in need of clean and sober housing and look forward to providing housing for persons in recovety in
the South King County area. In addition, both The Compass Center and Oxford are committed to being
good neighbors. We wolk hard to see our projects successfully integrated into the neighborhoods where they
are located.
We would be more than happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss this project further. Please
feel free to contact myself or Janice Hougen, the Program Manager, at (206) 461-7835.
Sincerely,
7ii'd ~
William R Friedhoff
Executive Director
t (Q) l~rf
. (253) 661-4000
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
August 3, 2001
Mr. William R. Friedhofft Executive Director
The Compass Center
77 South Washington Street
Seattle, WA 98104
Re:
01-102820-00-AD, Oxford House Inquiry
Dear Mr. Friedhoff:
This letter is in response to your July 13, 2001 request for determination that the
proposed use for a single-family home in Federal Way is permitted under the city's
definition of family.
Your letter states that your non-profit agency intends to purchase a house in a Federal
Way single-family residential zoning district and lease the house to Oxford House. This
non-profit organization will provide housing to persons in recovery. The Oxford House
model typically houses up to eight persons in recovery.
Under the dty's definition section of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1,
family means an individual or two or more individuals related by not more than four
degrees of affinity or consanguinity and induding persons under legal guardianship, or
a group of not more than five persons who are not related by four or fewer degrees of
affinity or consanguinity. However, the limitation on the number of persons residing in
a structure shall not be applied if it prohibits the dty from making reasonable
accommodations to disabled persons in order to afford such person equal opportunity
to use and enjoy a dwelling unit as required by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of
1988 (FHAA), 42 U.S.C 3604(f)(3)(b).
Based on the FHAA, the dty must provide reasonable accommodation to disabled or
handicapped persons. As you indicated, the definition of handicapped has been
interpreted to ¡ndude persons recovering from addiction to an illegal drug as long as
they are not currently using this illegal drug.
Therefore, based on acceptable documentation that Oxford House operates a residence
for persons in recovery and provides services to these disabled persons, the residential
project would be considered exempt from Federal Way land use processes, procedures,
Mr. Friedhoff
August 3, 2001
Page 2
..-
'-."'.
i '
\:;;;,.:. "':;::
and fees. The number of persons residing in the house would not be limited by the
FWCC definition of family.
Please be advised that an Oxford House project would not be exempt from the Uniform
Building Code (UBe) requirements, and building permits must be obtained for any work
proposed at the residential unit. In addition, if Oxford House is regulated by the State
of Washington as a licensed care fadlity provider, the Oxford House residential unit
shall be reviewed for compliance as a licensed care (LC) facility and other appropriate
regulations as required.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (253) 661-4103 if you have any questions about
this letter.
Sincerely,
(;)~ ~
Deb Barker
Associate Planner
Ene:
FWCC section 22-1
e:
Stanley Yntema, CDBG CoordinatDr
Ann Gunther, Human Services Manager
Mary Kate Martin, Building Offidal
Karl Ommer, Lead Development Specialist
Ale
Doc. LD. '" 15&11
:~~Â:'~-'
-=:...- ~ ~
THE COMPASS CENTER
A Lutheran Organization
Boa'" of Directors
Shari Bilcon
Verlon Brown
Marty Dasl",
Mike Halvorson
Cheryl Hart
Slacy Kern
Kacey Kroeger
Julie UghtlOOI
Ron H. Lynch
Slephen Nelson
DeMar Sather
Joseph Sidbury
Heather Simmons
John Sinkula
Ed Stemple
Peler Struck
Thao Tiedt
Paul Winlerslein
Rick Friedhoff
Executive Dlrectar
77 5. Washington Street
Seattle. Washington 98104
(206) 461-7835
Fax (206) 461-3874
COMMr'N~ßECENEDBY
- f'VF.IOPMF'IT n"p~RTMENT
OCT 0 9 2001
October 5, 2001
Ann Gunther, Human Services Manager
City of Federal Way
City Hall
33530 First Way South
P.O. Box 9718
Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
Dear Ms. Gunther:
As you are aware the Compass Center has purchased a home in Federal Way that will be
developed into an Oxford House. On October 17,2001 we are scheduled to meet with the
Twin Lakes Community Council to discuss our housing program. We have spoken with
Greg Eckland, the Twin Lakes Community Council Presìdent, and are formally on their
agenda for the meeting on October 17th. The Community Council Meeting is schedule for
7:00 p.m. and will meet at the Twin Lake Association's meeting hall at 32228 - 22nd Ave
S.W.
We are formally requesting you or other appropriate staffftom the City of Federal Way to
attend tills meeting with us. In the past, we have found it especially beneficial to have all
parties, including funders, to be present at community meetings to answer questions and to
demonstrate united support for the project. We hope you can join us at tills important
meeting. I can be contacted at (206) 461-7835, ext. 30.
Sincerely,
p~~~
Janice Hougen
Program Manager
cc:
Rick Friedhoff
Mary Burki
.
A""""Way~
.'./
MaryKate Martin - FW: oxford house
Page 1 of 1
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
"Guza, Ken" <GuzaKW@dshs_wa.gov> =
"'ma rykate. ma rti n@ci.federal-way.wa.us'" <ma rykate_marti n@ci.federal-way.wa.us>
01109/200208:09 AM
FW: oxford house
> ..-..Original Message..-..
> From: Guza, Ken
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:04 PM
> To: 'marykate.martin@ci.federal.way.wa.us'
> Subject: oxford house
>
> I am responding to your phone message of 1/7/02 about an Oxford House in
> Federal Way and our phone conversation this morning.
>
> Oxford Houses are not licensed by the state. 'There are no staff or
> services located in houses. House do not receive operating funds from the
> state of Washington.
>
> Oxford House is a peer run husing model for people in recovery. Houses are
> located in rental properties. Houses are found across the country in more
> than 35 states- They operate using standarized operating manuals- An
> imporatnt operating principle is that houses are good neighbors. The
> physical maintenance of houses is important to being good neighbors.
> '
> Houses are democratically run by the residents. Resident elect house
> officers and they and hold weekly house meetings. Houses in an area houses
> are organized into chapters which provide peer support between houses.
> Oxford Houses chapters hold meetings and offer another level of peer
> support- House residents and elected house officers participate in
> workhops and conferences during the year as another way of supporting the
> quality of individual houses.
>
> Oxford House are an important housing resource. Virtually every family is
> affected by addiction. When people choose recovery they often need housing
> following treatment. Lack of housing and returning to the old using
> environment is a key risk factor for relapse. SuppoEting recovery is good
> public policy and all of us benefit.
>
>
file://C:\windows\TEMP\GW}OOOII.HTM
r
0 I /09/2002
Application For Membership In Oxford House
To be,l!cœp!~d 'In'¡¡n Oxford,House BI .app1~n( :,mùsL:comp~te '!icitll ,sides of. this application - and ~:Intervlewed- by thl
tesidents of the particula!Oxford House1o'Y.Jhichclhe 'applicantls ..aPPlYing. The, resldei'(ts "of the :!IeuS!! tÏíen' :ýote 01
acœ~tanœ. . ~ !IO%-affinnative vo~ 'is 'n~ed'tó::be :acëè,~të(t <:arefuUy"~ad the ap¡JJiëation'and h"óriestiŸ'-åriSVierthl
questions. Uvlng m,anOxford House" IS speClal.-and if you understand Its value I! can help-you achieve comfortable sobriet¡
without relapSe.
1. Print Name (Las~ FÌIS~ Middle) 3. Date of Birth
Mon1h I Day rOM
2. Present address (Street) Check if treatment faålity 0 4. Phone Where Y 00 Can Be Reaå1ed
Home ( )
City Stde Zip
Wor1< ( )
5. Are you an Alcoholic? 6.OateofYour 9. Us! dNgs you used adäldively:
DYes DNo LastOrink?
7. Are you addicted to drugs? 8. Oate of last
Dyes DNo drug use?
10. When did you attend your fits! MorNA meeting? 11. Hem many ANNA meeting do you OON attend ead1
week?
12. Do you want to stop drinking alcohol and using addictive drugs? 13. Are you employed?
Dyes 0 No 0 Yes ONo If "yes" who is your employer?
14. Are you getting welfare or OCher non-job related i>come? 15. If you do not haw a job wi! you get one?
0 Yes 0 No If"yes"what? Dyes D No 1f"yes"vd1at job plans do you have?
17. What do you expect your rnonIhIy income 10 be next
16. What is your !!!!!!!!!!!l income right roNI month?
$ $
18. Marital status [Check One] 19. Do you have a meá¡caf dOctor?
0 Married, 0 Never Married, D Separated, D Divorced Dyes oNo
If "yes" is! the doctor's name and phone nWtlber:
-
20- Have you ever been to a treatment facility for alcoholism andIor drug addiction? 21. Do you take presaiption drugs?
DYes 0 No If "yes" list the treatment provider, phone number and primary 0 Yes 0 No If "yes" list drugs and reason the drug
counselor, if arr¡. has been prescribed.
",
Please complete the other side of Ihis application. ...
".
@ 2000 Oxford House World Services, 1010 Wayne Ayenue, Suite 400, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910
Telephone (301) 587-2916" Facsimile (301) 58~2
Side 2
22. Date of 1I1O\I81o? 0 Immediately 0 Other - W 'other' IsIthe date you wcuId want 10 -in, if acœpIed, and why the date Is In the fut1n
rather than immediately. Date: - Reason:
,
23. Have you ever lived in an Oxford House before? 0 Yes 0 No If "yes,' provide the name and location óf the Oxford House below and
answer question 24.
24. [Answer this quesöon if the answer 10 question 23 was "yes.1 IIeß the previous Oxfont House lor the following reason: (checi< one)
0 relapse, 0 voluntarily, 0 othet reason(s)
I, did 0 or do not 0 owe money 10 the Oxford House I left. If I äld owe money to the Oxford House llelt, I wiD agree 10 repay the money I owed 10 my
former Oxford House. 0 Yes 0 No
25. Emeroencv Telephone Numbets. m.ist lam doctor. if YOU have one, + two familv membefS or friends
Name and Address Relationship Telephone
1-
2-
3-
26. I realize that the Oxford House to which I am applying for residency has been established. in
compliance with the conditions of § 2036 of the Federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, P.L. 100-690, as
amended, which provides that federal money loaned to start the house teq~ires the house residents to
(A) prohibit all residents from using any alcohol or illegal drugs, (8) expel any resident who violates
such prohibition, (C) equally. share household expenses Including the monthly lease payment, among all
residents, and (D) utilize democratic decision making within the group including inclusion in and
expulsion from the group. - In accepting these terms, the applicant excludes himself or herself from the
nonnal due process afforded by local landlord-tenant laws.
21. Use this space for additional relevantlnfonnatlon:
28. I have read all of the material on this application form including the limitations set forth in item 26. I
have also answered each question honestly and want to achieve comfortable recovery from alcoholism
and/or drug addiction without relapse.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
FOR USE BY.OXFORD HOUSE
0 ACCEPTED 0 NOT ACCEPTED MOVE IN DATE MOVE OUT DATE:
HOUSE KEYS RlITURNED 0 YES 0 NO OUTSTANDING DEBTTO HOUSE $ DATE REPAID
@ 2000 Oxford House World Services . Call 1-800-689-6411 for the Oxford House nearest you.
; SUGGESTED OXFORD HOUSE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
Open by explaining the Oxford Concept briefly and showing CBS "60 Minute" Tape.
Being honest is the most important part of !he interview and that no particular answer will
necessarily result in nonacceptance.
NOTE TO INTERVIEWERS:
DO
LISTEN
SHARE briefly your sameness.
Put person at ease.
Keep personal opinions to yourself.
Ask questions if you want more information-
DON'T
Give advice about their recovery (you aren't a counselor).
Discuss anything relating to house business or another
member's problems.
Discuss sexual preference, politics or religion.
REMEMBER THAT THESE ARE ONLY GUIDELINES. IF THERE ARE ANY
"GUT FEELINGS" THAT SOMETHING ELSE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED,
NOW IS THE BEST TIME TO DO SO!
1.
2.
Tell us a little about yourself (background).
How did you get to this point in your recovery?
How do you feel about your addiction? (Probe for denial - do they accept
disease concept - anger - willingness - desire?)
What is your plan for recovery? Can you provide us with a written copy?
3.
4.
5.
Do you go to ANNA or other supportgroups?
Have you identified your relapse triggers? What are they?
Can you tell us behaviors that may indicate that you may be headed toward
a relapse? If we see these behaviors in you, would you comply with a
House vote for special requirements?
6.
7.
8.
What is your job history? Do you have a profession, trade or skill? If so,
what? Do you have reentry plans?
Do you have an anger problem? What provokes the anger? (Probe for
aggressive behavior, physical and domestic violence, isolation.) Have you
ever attended anger management?
10.
11. '
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Are you involved in a relationship (significant other, children, etc.)?
Do you have any medical problems, including mental disorders the House should
be aware of? If you are on medications, does the doctor prescribing the drugs'
know of your addiction? Would you be responsible with your medications and keep
them safely stored?
Are you involved in any relationships that may be potentially disruptive
to the House? .
Do you have any legal issues pending (court dates, probation, etc.)?
Can you handle being confronted and how is your temper?
Can you confront others in a constructive manner?
What do you feel you can offer Oxford House?
SCENARIO: Your roommate and you become buddies. One day your rooml"(1ate
tells you they have had a real down time (lost job, breakup with girlfriend, death
in family, etc.), needed to unwind and had just one little toke or just a couple
of drinks - but, of course, will never do it again. They don't want to leave the house
and ask you to keep it a secret. How would you handle this?
Why do you want to live in an Oxford House?
Explain the rent and sobriety deposit: then - do you think you could handle your
financial obligations to the House?
Explain: House meetings and rules pertaining to them (include weekly,
special, emergency).
Do you have any prejudice issues? Examples: racial, sexual preference, etc.
Would you have any problems performing. chores?
Explain: that if accepted but not ready to move, the only way to assure that a bed
will be available is to pay rent and sobriety deposit.
If accepted, when could you pay and when could you move in?
Explain: The voting procedures of accepting a new member (must be 80% of
House membership). When they can expect an answer.
Be sure to read aloud the disclaimer after line #20 (on application) and ask if they.
understand it. .
-j, '
INTERVIEW ETI Q UE~
The interview process within your house is a very important part of getting and
keeping your house full and financially self-supporting.
Although each house is autonomous, there are suggested interview guidelines that
each house can follow. These guidelines were in the Presidents' packets handed
out at last spring's House Officers Workshop. Your Outreach worker can supply
your house with a copyif you don't already have one.
Below,are a few suggestions that can help to make the interview process a more
comfortable one for the house and the applicant.
. Have the application and pen ready with a quiet place for the applicant to sit
and fill it out.
. Introductions: Each individual will introduce themselves.
. Open with a brief explanation of the Oxford House concept.
. Show the "50 Minutes. video. (Have house members sit and watch with applicant.
This is also a good time to pass around the application for members to review.)
. Have applicant speak briefly about himlherself.
. Conduct your Q & A time.
. Give a brief explanation of share of expenses,' sobriety deposits, house expectations,
chores, fines, etc.
. Ask applicant if they have any questions for the house.
=
Once the interview is over, make sure you have a contact phone number where
the applicant can be reached. Explain that after they leave, the house members
will discuss the interview and vote. Let them know that someone (usually the House
President) will call to say if they have been accepted or not.
In the event that the applicant was not accepted and they question why, explain
to them that they did not get an 80% vote from the House members - then refer
them to another house.
~HN-11ð-~ 1::>'::>'>
DIaft
HUJ
COMPASS CENTER
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OXFORD HOUSES
OwnedÙ)':
The Compass Center
Managed by:
The Compass Center and Oxford House
01/10102 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536]
Draft
JHN-l_&:I1<¿ l~;~,j
r-.<J-)
I.
H\..U
"'~'"
PhysiCal Plant
a. General Descriution:
The program will consist of two single family residences. One residence will be
located in south King County and one will be located in east King County.
b. Number and size of un its:
The Compass Center will purchase two single family homes, of about 3,000
square feet of living space per house. Each house will have six bedrooms, for a
total of12 units.
c. Accommodations:
Accommodations will consist of 12 bedrooms. Eight of the 16 residents will share
a room and 8 residents will have thcir own bedroom.
d. Amenities;
The houses.offer many amenities, ineluding fully equipped kitchens with up to
date appliances. The houses will offer spacious living environments, including
the shared common spaces (kitchen, living and dining rooms, bathrooms, yards,
etc.) The houses will also be conveniently located near public transportation and
shopping districts.
e. Accessibility:
The c;ompBss Cent.er will make an effort to secure houses that have at least one
bedroom on the ground floor.
01110/02 THO 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8S36J
JHN-l\:--~ l~:~~
Draft
1-
HLIJ
Tenant Popnlation
a- HouseholdcomDosition:
The house located in south King County will serve 8 men in recovery from
drug/alcohol addiction. The east King County house will serve 8 women in
recovery from drug/alcohol addiction.
b. Demol!I1!Dhics:
The persons to be served by this program are single individuals, 18 years or older,
who are committed to remaining clean and sober. Prospective residents will have
completed a treatment program and be alcohol and drug free at the time of
application to a house.
The Compass Center's and Oxford House's experience with other housing
progråms demonstrates that a diverse group of people are served. We expect the
. average age to be mid to late 30's, with many participants representing diverse
ethnic! minority groups. The Compass Center and Oxford House will not
discriminate against any prospective residents on the basis of race, religion, color,
mañtal status, age, national origin; sexual orientation, or mental, physical, or
sensory handicaps.
c. Proeram canacitv:
The WOgram capacity at any given time will be 16 participants. Eight will be
composed of men and 8 will be composed of women.
d. Estimated number of tenants housed Der vear:
The program anticipates housing up to 2S individu.aIs per year; The program
anticipates operating at full or near full capacity by maintaining contact with
treatment programs, updating a web site, and utilizing the Oxford House hotline.
e. Service to residents of unincoroorated Kin11: CountY:
The Compass Center and OxfOId House will actively recruit elig¡òle program
participants from unincorporated King County. The program will notifY
treatment programs and services located in unincorporated King County about the
program and actively encourage refena1s of eligible applicants.
ll.
Tenant Population
a. Manaeement DhÏlosophv:
Each house is a self-managed entity. All residents attend weekly house meetings
and all matter ofbusincss is discussed: rental payment and expenses for the
month; housekeeping matters; diSIUptive behavior of residents, if any; and
progress toward maintaining sobriety.
Oxforo House, Inc. provides a detailed operating manual that covers all aspects of
managing a house - how to elect officers, what officers to elect and their duties,
01110/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536]
JAN-1Ø-zø02 15:54
Draft
HCD
financial forms for preparing a house budget. instroctions on how to conduct a
"house audit", tasks and forms for the chore coordinator, and much more.
The Oxford House management philosophy is encompassed in a self-nul program
that fosters individual responsibility, self-confidence, and success. Each member
has an equal voice in all house affairs. The goal with each house is to create a
supportive peer environment that will foster sobriety and self-reliance.
b. Tvne ofhousine::
The Oxford House provides permanent housing. Residents are allowed to stay as
long they choose; provided they adhere to the basic house rules. Average length
of stay is about one year.
c. SUÐ'Dort services nrovided:
The Oxford House model operates on five distinct levels. The first level is the
. national organizational level. It is at the national level that overall policies are
developed and documents such as the operating manual are prepared. The
national organization "charters" new houses as a way of acknowledging a new
house" agreement to operate under the national program guidelines.
The second level is the State Board of Directors composed of the ten state chair
persons ftom each of the ten chapters and three alumni. Their function is to
oversee the work of the chapters.
The tlrird level of operation for Oxford Houses is the "chapter" affiliates. Each
house is linked to a group of about 10 houses. Chapter members meet monthly to
discuss house operations and to provide moral and technical support as needed,
especially to new houses. .
The third level is operation of the individual house following the self-
management approach. This approach is the foundation of the Oxford House
concept and the basis for the program's level of success in helping residents learn
and practice the behaviors necessary to maintaining a clean and sober life style. If
there is any perception of a potential relapse, residents are quick to challenge
fellow residents as to how their recovery is progressing.
The State's Division of Alcoholism ãnd Substance Abuse (DASA) provides the
fifth level. The State pays 3 outreach workers to nurture the smooth operation of
existing Oxford Houses and to foster the development of new houses.
The sixth level is the link to existing recovery services in the community. Many
residents of Oxford Houses attend AA and/or NA meetings. Others seek
continued treatment services ftom qualified chemical dependency providers.
Each resident is encouraged by their housemates to pUISue a program ofrecovery
that will work for that particular individ~al:
01/10/02 THU 16: 49 [n/RX NO 8536)
. .
JHI'I-llð-ðO"'¿ 1::>-:>4
Draft
Hl..U
UL
Management and Operation of the Premises.
a. Management entity and staffing:
Management Entity:
The Compass Center will be the owner of the properties. The Compass Center
will enter into a contractual agreement with Oxford Houses of Washington
to operate the program. This contract will be reviewed and updated on a regular
basis.
Staffing:
Compass Center Transitional Housing Program Manager:
The Compass Center Executive Director:
The Compass Center Executive Director will act on behalf of the Compass Center
to ensure that the real and personal property of the project will be maintained in a
manner that will enhance its economic value and prolong its utility.
The Compass Center Executive Director will supervise the Transitional Housing
Program. Manager who will administer the overall operations of the property in a
manner consistent with the policies and procedures set forth in this plan and
approved by the Executive Director.
TransiJiøllal Housing Program Manager: .
The Transitional Housing Program Manager will supexvise property sCIVÍces for
the project. The Transitional Housing Program Manager will be responsible for
supervising The Compass Center staff, together with Oxford Houses of
Washington. will administer the day to day operations, including maintenance and
fiscal oversight, of the property in a manner consistent with the lease and
. procedures set forth in this plan..
The Transitional Housing Program. Manager will use her best efforts to ensure the
sub-contractee (Oxford House) will provide residents of the program prompt,
efficient, courteous and quality service. and to assist the Executive Director to
ensure that the real and personal property of the Compass Center will be .
maintained in a manner that will enhance its economic value and prolong its
utility.
General authority and responsibüittes
The TransitionßJ. Housing Program Manager, in conjunction with Oxford Houses
of Washington. is responsible for the fonnulation of all policies necessary to
provide effective and efficient administration of the property.
01110/02 THU 16: 49 [TX/RX NO 85361
~AN-1Ø-2ØØ2 15: 55
Draft
HCD
""""""""
Compass Center
Buildin Maintenance
Tasks:
Maintain safe and efficient operation of
all electrical, mechanical, plumbing, -
safe and sarti ui ment
Monitor and coordinate maintenance
repair services
Regularly inspect building, grounds, and
ui ment
Maintain records on all wolk perfonned,
and on all ital ui ment
MaintaincompIete set of "as built"
dra~s showing all structural,
mechanical and electrical s
Answer and respond to resident general
fire alarm and em enc situations
Oxford
Oxford
nn to Perform Task:
Compass Center/ Oxford
Compass Center
Compass Center! Oxford
Compass Center
Compass Center
Compass Center! Oxford
Maintenance Supervisor
The Maintenance Supervisor shall respond to maintenance and ground needs as
necessaI)' to maintain safety of the structures and carry out policies set forth in
this Management Plan and the directives of the Transitional Housing Program
Manager and the Executive Director.
General Autho~' and R onsihilities
Tasks:
Notify proper. person in event of an
emergency situation requiring immediate
atientio such as lumbin securi etc.
Ensure jai!itorial duties are perfonned a
scheduled basis to assure proper
cleanliness and safe
Respond to maintenance complaints,
iden~ and correct the problem or
schedule the air work
Know the location and operation ofmajor
utility and telephone lines, meters, and
controls
Oxford
Compass Center! Oxford
Compass Center! Oxford
01110/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536)
-!R-I-10-2ØØ2 15: 55
Draft
HCD
29~
I-'.W
Monitor and coordinate maintenance. pest
control. and repair services done by
vendors aDd contractors
Ensure safe and efficient operation of all
eleètricai, mechanical, plumbing, safety,
and sani e ui ment
Compass Center! Oxford
Compass Center! Oxford
Resilknts
Residents shall comply with all rules and regu1ations now established or hereafter
duly adopted or modified by Oxford Houses of Washington.
Alterations and Repairs: Residents shall make minor repairs such as, but not
limited to, replacing light bulbs in common areas and replacing washers in
leaking faucets. Residents shall make no changes, major repairs, or alterations of
the premises or equipment, including the application of wall paper or paint
. without prior approval ftom the Compass Center or Oxford Houses of
Washington.
Grounds Upkeep: Residents shall ensure that planting beds are weeded, litter
picked up, and that yard and planting beds are maintained and watered.
ApplÙ!nces and Equipment: Residents shalI ~ only in reasonable manner all
elec1rical, plumbing, sanitaIy, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and other
facilities and equipment. and shall not use any apparatus for heating except that
provided without prior written consent by the¡ Compass Center.
Qeaning Premises: Residents shall clean the premises and all equipment on a
daily basis.
Codes: Residents shall comply with all obligations imposed upon residents by
applicable provisions of environmental and bonsing còdes materially affecting
health and safety.
Cond,Ud: Resident shalI not, nor allow other persons who are on the premises
with resident's consent to conduct themselves in a manner which will distrub
other's peaceful enjoyment of their accommodations. Resident's behavior shall
be conducive to maintaining the neignborhood in a decent, safe, and sanitary
condition.
Damages: Residents shall report to Oxford, who will notify the Compass Center,
if necessary, any breakage. damage, or need for repairs to the premises or
equipment therein, and shall promptly report any unsafe or unsanitary conditions
in the building and/or grounds which may lead to damage or injury.
Fire Preventüm: No hazardous material shall be kept on the premises.
01/10/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536)
Draft
JAN-ll11-2ØØ2 15:55
t"."'"
HCD
~
Inspections: The Compass Center and Oxford have the ñght to inspect the
houses, including individual units, at any given time. Resident's will be given at
least three days notice prior to any general inspections of the house. The Staff of
The Compass Center further reserves the ñght of access to premises for repairs,
alteration, improvement, supplying of services or emergencies.
Locks: Residents shall not install additional or different locks or gates on any
doors or windows of the dwelling without the written permission oCthe
Transitional Housing Program Manager.
Maintenance: Residents shall keep their unit in a clean, orderly, and safe
condition.
Parking: Parking will be allowed in assigned, designated areas only.
. Pets: Residents shall not keep cats, dogs, or other pets on the premises (except
service animals used by persons with a disability) without the written consent of
the Transitional Housing Program Manager.
Smokbrg: Smoking is not pennitted inside the premises.
b. Tenant selection and eligibility detennination:
Screening Procedures:
. Interested individuals must get an application from a house or a treatment
agency. .
. Complete the application and submit to the house.
. Call the house to schedule an interview appointment.
. Show up on time for an interview by members of the house.
. It takes an 80 pexcent "yes" vote by house members to be admitted.
Eligibility Criteria:
. Completion of in patient treatment program, or
. 1 ()...day detoxification with an intensive outpatient program,or
. 30 days of being clean and sober. .
. Each individual must be willing to accept house rules.
. Each individual must be able to pay his/ller share of house expenses.
. Each individual must have the desire to work on his/ller recovery.
. Applicants must be eighteen years of age or older.
. Applicants must be at or below 50% area median income as published
annually by HUD.
c. Marketimr D1an:
The Compass Center and Oxford House will comply with affinnative marketing
practices and Fair Housing regulations in the outreach and selection of residents .
01/10/02 THU 16: 49 [TI/RX NO 8536] .
DIaft
JAN-1Ø-2ØØ2 15:56
HCD
Compass Center and Oxford House will comply with the provisions ofFed&a1.
State and local laws including. but not limited to Title VI of the Civil Rights Aet
of 1964, ExecutiveOrdcr 11036, and Title vm of the 1968 Civil Rights Act
prohibiting discrimination in housiñg on the grounds of race, color, creed, sex,
national origin or sexual orientation.
d. Rent for the nrernises:
Rent sChedule:
The Compass Center and Oxford House are committed to providing housing for
individuals at 50% or below median area income for fifty years. Residents of the
program will initially pay $280.00 a month for their share of rent, utilities., and
house and chapter dues. Rents will incx:menta1ly be increased as needed.
ProceQ.ure for detennining rent:
Aß part of the application process, incomes of prospective residents will be
. verified.
Rent Collection:
Rents for the houses will be collected directly by house members- The two house
officers responsible for rent collection are the treasurer and the comptroller.
These positions are rotated amongst house members.
e. Rules for oneration of the premises and enforcement nrocedures:
f. Procedure for dealine with tenant corno1aints:
g. Descrintion of security and ememencv nlans:
. Firê eXtingUishers and posted evacuation plans
. Smoke detectors in all common areas and bedrooms
. Eip.ergency numbers posted by the telephone
. Semi-annual house inspections to monitor safety and system checks.
h. Maintenance and I'CDak: .
It is the policy of The Compass Center that the properties be maintained and
repaú'ed in accordance with safe and sanitaIy conditions and local codes.
Maintenance and repairs will be the responsibility of Compass Center or its
designated sub-contraetor. All equipment and machinery will be inspected and
serviced in accordance with manufactures specifications and locals codes.
Compass Center will prepare and implement a schedule for preventive
maintenance activities.
Compass Center may contract with qualified independent contractors for the
maintenance and repair of all building systems and for extraordinary repairs
beyond the capabilities of the in-house staff.
01/10/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536)
JRN-I0-2ØØ2 15:56
HCD
29b1d~
1-'.11
Draft
Facilitating maintenance and repairs will be the responsibility of the Executive
Director and the Transitional Housing Program Manager. All equipment and
machinery will be inspected and serviced in accordance with manufactUrerS
specifications and local codes.
Minor repairs and preparation ofvacant rooms will be camed out by the residents
of the houses. Any repairs or equipment failure of a serious nature will be
reported by the residents to the appropriated Compass Center staff. Service
requests of residents will be systematically and promptly responded to by
Compass Center staff as the situation wamnts and the circumstances permit.
Emergency requests will be received and serviced on a 24 hour basis. Records of
all such request shall be kept
1- Description onon!!: tenn maintenance plan and maintenance reserve fund:
The Compass Center is committed to maintaining the.properties for at least 50
. years. To this end, a rigorous maintenance plan will be closely followed. The
maintenance plan will include the following:
. Semi-annUlll house in.mections: The maintenance supervisor will semi-
annually, thoroughly inspect the premises for puxposes of maintenance up-
keep. Types of inspection include:
Exterior. roof; gutters, downspouts, concrete walls, parking areas, signs,
fences, landscaping.
~ cleanliness of common areas and hallways, carpeting, smoke
detectors, emergency lights, storage areas, laundIy.
Units: living room, dining area, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms, closets.
. Ref!Ular fcheduled maintenance: The maintenance supervisor will coordinate
regular scheduled mainœn"nce, including fire safety equipment inspection,
unit painting and furnace cleaning.
. Lon'{ Term Maintenanœ and Reserves FlUId: A separate maintenance
reserve fund will be established for each house. Deposits into the reserve
accounts will be made monthly ftom property income. Please see the attached
facilities operating budget
01/10/02 THU 16: 49 [TI/RX NO 8536]
JR-I-1ß-2ØØ2 15: 57
HCD
~
t"'.l¿
Leas"e Agreement
The parties to this lease.agreement dated the day of September 2001 are The Compass
Center, A Lutheran Organization, herein called Landlord, and Oxford House, a Wash~ngton non-
profit corporation, herein called Tenant.
Landlord is the owner of the residence commonly known as 31411 42nd Place SW, Federal Way
Washington 98023, that is legally described as Lot 33, plat of Twin Lakes #6 recorded in yolume
101 at page 33 of plats, records of King County, Washington. The above-described propeny is
herein called the Leased Premises
Landlord desires to lease the Leased Premises to Tenant. Tenant desires to lease the Leased
Premises from Landlord. Tenant will use the Leased Premises to provide affordable, clean and
sober hoUsing, for people in recovery using the Oxford House self managed model.
Now Therefor in return for the mutual covenants contained in this Lease Agreement the
parties agree as follows.
I.TERM The tenn of this lease shall be ten (10) years. The lease term shall commence on the
first day of the month following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Leased Premises.
The parties estimate t1üs date to be on or around March 1,2002. The lease tenn, unless extended as
provided below, shall terminate ten years after its inception-
Tenant shall have the right to extend the term ofthis lease for eight (8) option terms offive (5)
years each. Tenant shall, as a condition ofits right to extend the lease term, provide Landlord with
written notice of Tenant's election to extend the term of the lease. Said notice shall be given at least
one year prior to the expiration of the then current lease term.
2.RENT Tenant agrees to pay, without demand, to Landlord as monthly rent for the first tWo
years of the lease term an amount of money equal to the sum of the following items: Management
fee of$375.00, insurance reimbursement fee of$133.00, maintenance fee 0£$300.00, and a
replacement reserve deposit amount of $1 05.00. Rent for each succeeding year of the Lease Term
shall be adjusted by the parties to reflect the increase or decrease in insurance costs and
maintenance costs so that Landlord receives its..management fee on a ¡;let basis. The dollar amount
of the management fee component of the rent formula shall be adjusted every five years during the
Lease Term. The amount of the adjustment shall be an amount equal to the increase or decrease in
the Consumer Price Index increase for the previous five-year period.
3.Use of Leased Premises The Leased Premises shall be used by Tenant to operate a residential
home for people who are in recovery. The house shall be occupied by not more than eight persons.
Residents shall be 18 years of age or older, clean and sober at the time of their entry into the house.
The Leased Premises shall be managed in the typical Oxford House self managed modeL Tenant
acknowledges that occupants of the house must be income qualified to be residents of the Leases
Premises. Residents may not have incomes that exceed 50% of the median income for residents of
01/10102 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 85361
;rAN-1ø-2ØØ2 15: 57
Hen
296Ø229
P.13
King County. Tenant shall be responsible to verify that residents are income qualified. Tenant shall
use-the Leased Premises for residential purposes. No part of the Leased Premises shall be used for
the purpose of carrying on any business, profession or trade of any kind.
4.Assignment Tenant shall not assign all or any interest in tills lease without the prior written
consent of the Landlord. Any purported assignment without the consent of Landlord shall at
Landlord's option terminate this Lease.
5.Condition ofthe Leased Premises Tenant stipulates that it has examined the Leased Premises,
including the grounds and all improvements. Landlord and Tenant have agreed upon certain
improvements to be made to the Leased Premises. These include but are not limited to a new roof,
barrier free accesses, plumbing improvements and construction to enable the Leased Premises to
accommodate eight adults. The agreed upon improvements will be detailed in plans and
specifications prepared by the project architect retained by Landlord. Prior to the commencement of
construction both Landlord and Tenant will approve the plans and specifications in writing. After
the construction has been completed and a certificate of occupancy issued by the appropriate
gove=ent authorities the Leased Premises will be accepted by Tenant and rent will commence on
the first day of the next month following issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
6. Alterations and Improvements Tenant shall make no alterations or additions to the Leased
Premises without the prior written consent of the Landlord. Any aIterations or additions shall
remain part of the Leased Premises at the expiration or sooner termination of the lease and be the
property of Landlord.
7. Maintenance and Repair Landlord shall be responsible for the repairs to the structural portions
of the roof, walls and foundation of the Leased Premises. Landlord shall also repair the underground
portion of the water and sewer lines that service the Leased Premises- At the commencement of
each option term of this lease, Landlord and Tenant shall inspect the walls, floor coverings and
appliances in the leased premises to determine if any of these needs to be replaced. Funds held by
Landlord in the replacement reserve account shall be used to purchase and install needed items.
Tenant will during the entire term of tills lease, at its expense maintain the Leased Premises in a
neat, clean and sanitary condition. Tenant shall keep the electric and plumbing fixtUres in the
Leased Premises in good order and repair, keep-the furnace clean, keep the walks free from debris,
the lawn mowed and maintain the entire yard in a neat and presentable condition. Tenant shall be
responsible for the cost to repair all damage that is caused by the misuse, waste or neglect of
Tenant's residents, their guests, agents or visitors to the Leased Premises.
8. Dangerous Materials Tenant shall not keep on the Leased Premises any article or thing of a
dangerous, inflammable, or explosive character that might unreasonably increase the danger of fire
on the Leased Premises or that would be considered hazardous, or extra hazardous by a responsible
insurance company standard.
01110/02 THU 16: 49
[TX/RX NO 8536]
JF'toI-l0-2002 15:58
HCD
~
"'.14
9. Animals Tenant shall not allow any domestic or other animals to live or remain on the Leased
Premises without the prior written consent of the Landlord.
10. Utilities Tenant shall be responsible for all utilities used on the Leased Premises during the
term of the lease including but not limited to, water, sewer, gas. electricity, telephone, cable, or
heating oil. Tenant will at Landlord's request provide evidence that the utility bills are being paid on
a current basis.
11. Inspection Landlord shal1 have the right to enter the Leased Premises for the purpose of
inspecting the Leased Premises. Landlord shall provide notice to Tenant prior to conducting the
inspections. The inspections shall be scheduled at times that reduce the impact on residents of the
Leased Premises.
12. Default In the event that either Landlord or Tenant does not perfonn their obligations under
the terms of this lease, then the non-defaulting party shal1 give notice of default to the party who has
failed to perform its obligation. The notice shall state the default that has occurred and provide a
cure period of not less than ten (10) calendar days. In the event that the default has not been cured
during the notice period then the non defaulting party shall be entitled to all of the remedies
provided by the laws of the state of Washington including: damages, specific performance, and
termination of this lease.
13. Attorneys Fees In the event that either Landlord or Tenant is.required to retain the services of
an attorney to enforce their rights under the terms of this lease, then the prevailing party in the
litigation or other court proceeding shall be entitled to receive as additional damages a sum equal to
reasonable attorneys f~ incurred.
14. Holdover by.Tenant In the event Tenant remains in possession of the Leased Premises
with the written or implied consent of the Landlord after the natural expiration of this lease, a new
month-to-monthtenancy shall be created between Landlord and Tenant. The new tenancy shall be
subject to all of the terms of the lease exCept for tenn of the tenancy. Either party may terminate the
new month-ta-month tenancy on thirty days written notice to the other party.
IS.Surrender of the Premises At the termination of the lease tenn Tenant shall surrender the
Leased Premises to Landlord in a good and cl~ condition. The premises shall be in the same
general condition as when the leased term commenced with an allowance being made for the
normal wear and tear on the Leased Premises dU(ing the term of the lease.
16. Management Plan Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the Leased Premises and
one additional residential site will have been acquired pursuant to very favorable financial terms
made available to the parties through the State of Washington, King County and local government
institutions- These financing sources have particular regulatory requirements that must be complied
with on a long-terni basis as a condition to receiving the purchase money funds on such a favorable
basis. These requirements are contained in long-term agreements between the Compass Center and
the King County Department ofCommtmÌty and HÜman Services Housing and Community
01/10102 rnu 16: 49
[TX/RX NO 8536)
JAN-10-2ØØ2 15:58
HCD
~
0-'.1::>
"
Development Department and the State ofWlfS1ùngton Department of Community Trade and
Economic Development Office of Community Development Housing Finance Unit. Memorandums
of the agreements encumber the Leased Premises and one additional residential property to be
acquired. This lease agreement is subordinate to the tenns and conditions of the agreements with the
State ofWaslñngton and King County. Tenant will receive a copy of the applicable contracts and
agrees to operate the Leased Premises in a manner that complies with the requirements contained in
the contracts. Pursuant to the tenns of the .funding contracts the Leased Premises is to be operated in
accordance with a Management Plan approved by King County. Landlord has pro"ided Tenant with
a copy of the draft plan for the Leased Premises. Landlord and Tenant will review the Management
Plan with appropriate government officials to adopt a plan that is approved by King County, local
government fimders and the parties. The property shall be operated in accordance with the approved
Management Plan.
17. Noticè All notices to be given pursuant to the tenns of this lease shalI be given in writing
and mailed to the other party by regular mail and by certified mail return receipt requested with
postage pre paid. Notice shall be deemed received on the date actually received. Notice shall be
given at the addresses provided by the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS LEASE ON
THE DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001.
LANDLORD
TENANT
STATE OF WASHINGTON
)
) ss.
)
COUNTY OF KING
On this day personally appeared before_me, . known
to be the . of the Compass Center, a Washington non-profit
corporation, the corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged the said
instrument to be the fice and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned and on oath stated that slhe was authorized to execute the same.
DATED:
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
01110102 THU 16:49 IU/RX NO 8SJ6
J~lØ-2ØØ2 15: 59
HCD
~
t".lb
reSiding in the county of
My appointment expires
01/10/02 THU 16: 49
[TX/RX NO 8536]
'"
Oxford House
Locations in
King County
....
Legend:
Oxford House
Location
Scale: 1 to 217560
1 Inch equals 18130 Feet
0 5 Miles
~- I
!:l
N
ThIs map Is Intended lor use .. a
cnøhlc8lrepresonlationONLY. The
CItY of Federal Way makes no
WlI/T8I1ty.. \0 Its accuracy.
,~
,
.,
1999
State
Evaluation of Washington
Network of Oxford Houses
Survey
Respondents:
1997: 247
[69% response]
1998: 323
[72% response)
Number of
Washington
Oxford Houses:
1997: 50
1998: 65
[30% Increase]
Number of
Recovery Beds
1997: 436
1998: 546
[25% Increase)
A verage Age
1997: 37.1
1998: 36.8
[4 months younger)
This report compares the profik and recovery data between of the two
survey periods -- October/November 1996 compared to Oclober/November
1998. In the earlier period. 247 residents of the Washington Stale Oxford
Houses completed the basic Oxford House questionnoire developed by the
late William Spillaine, Ph.D. in 1987'. In the most r«em period. 323
current residents of Washington State Oxford Houses completed (II
idenlicoI questionnaire..
When the 1997 "Profile and Evaluation of Waslùngton State
Network of Oxford Houses," was published in March, 1997,
there were 50 Oxford Houses. By the end of 1998 that
number had increased 30% for a total of 65 Waslùngton State
Oxford Houses -- 53 for men; 12 for women. Total number
of recoyery beds increased year-end to year-end from 436 to
546 -- slightly more than 25%.
In the latest survey period (October/November, 1998) there
were a total of 493 available Oxford House recovery beds in
the state. Excluding 41 vacancies during the survey period,
72% of residents completion a survey [323].
Average Age of Residents
Waslùngton State Oxford House residents in 1998 haye an
average age of 36.8 -- a slight decrease in the average age of
37.06 in 1997. The following figure shows the age
distribution:
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
I!I Age Ranges
18-29
29-40
40-50
60-70
50-60
As in 1997, nearly 40% of the Oxford House residents in the
state fell into the age 29 to 40 category.
I Evaluation published in March- 1997 as "1997 Evaluation of
Washington Slate Network of Oxford Houscs_"
Monthly Resident
Income:
1997:$1082
1998:$1322
[30% increase]
Percent of Residents
Employed:
1997: 58%
1998: 67 %
115% IncreaseI
Percent of Residents
Who are Veterans:
1997: 30.7%
1998: 27.2%
[12% decrease]
Percent of Residents
Who are Women
1997: 18.6%
1998: 21.9%
[17% Increase]
Length of Current
Sobriety:
1997: 12.6 months
1998: 17.1 months
[35% Increase]
2
Economic Status of Residents
There are several unique characteristics that account for the
success of Oxford House. One is that the houses are self-
supported. The recovering individuals themselves pay an
equal share of household expenses including repayment of any
loans used to originally establish the house. The average
weekly share of household expenses, including start-up loan
repayment, in the Washington State Oxford Houses is $67.62-
The avernge monthly income of the Washington State Oxford
House residents is $1322. This is an increase of 30% over
the monthly resident income at the end of 1997. This increase
is, in part, attributable to the increased percentage of
Washington State Oxford House residents who are employed-
In'the 1997 evaluation only 58% were employed at the end of
1996 when the sulVey was completed. The percent of
residents employed during the OctoberlNovember, 1998
survey period was 67% - a 25% increase in the number of
residents employed.1
This "self-help" feature of the Oxford House system of
operation makes Oxford Houses very low cost for the taxpayer
or tlùrd party payees. In addition, the fact that each resident
pays an equal share of expenses permits the democratic nature
of Oxford Houses to flourish. No individual is paying a
bigger share of household costs than any other indiyidual
which helps to insure that every resident has an equal say in
how an Oxford House operates.
The income of Oxford House residents not only pays the cost
of operating 65 recoyery houses witlùn the state but adds value
to the state's overall economic health. The chart on the
following page shows the return on the $150,000 state
expense to proyide technical assistance to the Oxford Houses
in the state. The first bar represents the state expense for
technical service. The second bar represents the amount
residents pay themselyes to keep the 65 Oxford, House
opernting. The tlùrd bar shows total earned income of
residents and the last bar shows the social security and
Medicare tax paid by the residents.
The importance of the economic turn around can best be
understood when measured against where Oxford House
residents were before moving into an Oxford House. In
1 In Washington State it is possible for newly recovering individuals to
receive a state payment following treatment. This payment of
approximately $350 provides a six month transition income for
individuals in early recovery. The existence of this payment accounts for
a significantly lower percentage of employed individuals among the
Washington State Oxford House residents than among residents in other
states.
"
"-
Dollars and
Sense For
Washington
State Taxpayers
Resident's
Aggregate Earnings:
$8,661,744
Resident's
Aggregate Payment
to Operate
Washington State
Oxford Houses:
$1,919,867
Residents Earning
Going To FICA Tax:
$1,268,945
State Government
Expenses To Provide
Technical Services
To Start Houses and
To Keep Existing
Houses On Track:
$150,000
Ratio of State
Annual Cost to
Resident's Annual
Cost to operate
the Network of
Washington
Oxford Houses:
1: 13
nearly 40% of Oxford House residents had either been
homeless or living in a state supported institution.
Frequency Distribution tor LAST LIVED The table at the left
. eo.n Percent shows where Oxford
House residents lived
immediately before
moving into an Oxford
House. As a matter of
fact 68.8% of Oxford
House residents had
been homeless for an
average period of six
months sometime prior
to their admission to an
Oxford House -- about the same as the 67% who reported
homelessness in the 1997 eyaluation.
APARTMENT
OW>ED HOUSE
RENTED HCXJSE
RENTED ROOM
JAIL
MENTAL HOSPITAL
VA HOSPITAl
HAlF-WAY HOUSE
HOMElESS
Total
78 24.<5
37 11,60
45 14,11
39 12.23
20 6.27
8 2.51
13 4,08
B 2.51
71 22.26
319 100,00
Comparison of Resident Share of Expenses With
State Expense and Amount Paid In FICA Tax
".000.000
ŒJ
",000.000
S7,000.OOO
$0,000.000
SS,OOO.OOO
S4,000.OOO
U.ooO.OOO
sz.ooO,OOO
$1.000,000
so
S""""M'
"""""'-'
T....-
FlCAT..
Oxford Hous~residents in the State of Washington, as in other
jurisdictions, assume responsibility for their own recovery and
pay the expenses of living in an Oxford House. The yarious
state reyolving loan funds established under §2036 of PLlQO-
690, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, provide the start-up
loans for groups of six or more recovering alcoholics and drug
addicts to establish a self-run, self-supported recovery house.
However, Washington State has gone a step further and
provides technical assistance to teach new Oxford House
members how to operate a house and to help organize the 65
houses in the state into mutually supportive Chapters and even
a statewide organization. Unlike, most states, Washington
State has expended $150,000 or more each year in order to
3
Military Veterans In
Washington State
Oxford Houses
While the percentage of
veterans slightly decrease
from 30.7% in the 1997
evaluation to 27.2% this
year, the absolute
number of yeterans
increase from 81 to 85.
This is because of the
25% increase in the
number of available
Oxford recovery beds in
the state.
During the last year
Oxford House central
services has developed a
number of Oxford Houses
in Virginia, North
Carolina and South
Carolina devoted
exclusiyely to the
recovering veteran
population. Several of
the Washington State
Oxford Houses, located
near Veteran's Hospitals,
seem to of a similar
nature. The Washington
State Oxford Houses may
want to further develop
this type of Oxford
House, I t is just the same
as any other Oxford
House but is located near
V A treatment and reaches
out to the recovering
Veteran peer group.
The survey data shows
that the 85 Waslúngton
State veterans had the
same outcomes as all other
residents of Washington
Oxford Houses. The
average age was slightly
higher; i.e., ayerage 43
vears versus 34 for those
without military service.
4
provide the hands-on assistance to enable houses to work well.
Their expenditures have reap great benefits. During 1998, for
example, the men and women living in Washington State
Oxford HOUieS expended $13 for every $1 spent by the state
in order to pay the household expenses for the 65 Oxford
Houses in the state.
From another perspective it is fair to ask what it would have
cost the state to have operated enough traditional halfway
houses to accommodate the 546 recovering individuals living in
Waslúngton State Oxford Houses. At the generally accepted
national figure for annual costs per traditional halfway house
beds, the cost to the state for housing 546 recovering
individuals in traditional halfway houses would have been
$ I2,558,000! That is about 84 times the amount the state spent
to establish and maintain the Washington State Network of 65
Oxford Houses.
Women in Washington Oxford Houses
The percentage of Oxford House residents in the state who are
women increase from 18.6% to 21.9 % -- a 17% increase
betWeen 1997 and 1999. Today, nearly 100 of the 546
Oxford recovery beds in the state are for women.
The women with an average age of 33.7 are four younger than
the men who haye an average age of 37.7. The ayerage
monthly income for the men [$1,405] is significantly higher
than for the women [$1,017].
Several Oxford Houses for women in the State of Washington
accept a few women along with their children. It appears that
tlús proyides a unique opportunity for many women because
most long-term residential programs do not accept women with
clúldren. Neither the 1996 nor 1998 survey's quantified the
extent of the women with clúldren residence.
The average age of women employed was 35 while those not
employed had an average age of 33. Just the opposite
relationship oCage and employment applied to male residents --
unemployed had an average age of 40 while. employed had an
average age of 35. A number of older men in houses who
have retired explains the differences in average age when
compared to employment
Education Level of Oxford House Residents
Alcoholism and drug addiction are egalitarian diseases and cut
across the population irrespectiye of background including
educational attainment The current residents in Waslúngton
State Oxford Houses have educational attainment ranging from
, .
"
Jail Time
1997: 77%
1998: 79%
Addiction - Alcohol
1997: 52%
1998: 48%
Addiction - Drugs
1997: 47%
1998: 53%
AAINA Meetings
Per Week
1997: 3.75
1998: 3.55
Plus Counseling
1997: 47.1 %
1998: 44.4%
No Show
12 Step Meetings
1998: 8%
3rd grade to post-graduate school. The average educational
attainment is 126 years. This is a little lower than the level of
educational attainment among Oxford House residents in some
other states but not significantly so.
Slate
Yo... of
School
Mean Educational Altaiomenl By Stale
TX KS MO SC CT WA
VA
12JJO
1297
12.67
12.99
1222
126
1236
Jail Time
Like Oxford House residents in most other states a significant
number of Washington State Oxford House residents have
served jail time -- 79.6%. This is slight Júgher than the 1996
percentage of 77%. The dUJation of jail time is somewhat less
on average than it was two years earlier - 13 months versus
14 months. The average number of time arrested, however, is
slightly greater -- 4.7 versus 3.8.
Drug Addiction Compared To Alcoholism Only
For the first time profiles have been collected of Washington
State Oxford House residents the number of drug addicts is
greater than the number of individuals addicted to alcohol only.
In 1996,52% of the residents were solely alcoholics; in 1998
47.8% were solely alcoholics. Conversely, in 1996, 47%
were addicted to crack, cocaine or heroin in addition to alcohol;
in 1998 that percentage jumped to 522%.
Once again there is no difference in relapse rate between those
addicted solely to alcohol or those addicted to drugs in addition
to alcohoL Both resident groups report a relapse rate of just
under 20%.
Recovery Treatment
Recoyery treatment is measured by the number of 12-step
meeting residents attend each week and the percentage of
residents who attend counseling sessions in addition to 12-step
meetings. In 1996 the percentage of individuals who
attended weekly counseling sessions in addition to 12-step
meetings was 47.1%. In 1998,44.4% attended counseling
sessions in addition to 12-step meetings.
The average number of AA or NA 12-step meetings attended
each week was 3.75% in 1996 and 3.55% in 1998. The
difference is so small that it is not significant Both in 1996
and 1998 the Washington State Oxford House residents attend
more weelcly meetings than the ayerage AA or NA member --
3.5 versus 2.1. It is of some concern that a little oyer 8% [28J
of the residents attend no l2-step meetings. (See side bar next
page.)
5
Why Attend AA or
NA Meetings
There is no magic bullet
to "cure" alcoholism or
drug addiction - only
true behayior change. It
takes time, peer support
and hard work to change
behavior. Alcoholics
Anonymous (AA) and
Narcotics Anonymous
(NA) are self-help groups
which consist of speaker
or discussion meetings.
The recovering persons at
the meetings talk about
their own addiction and
the ways they have
become comfortable in
staying away from the
first drink or first drug
use which triggers the
compulsive craving and
use of the drug.
The "Twelve Steps" are a
progressive set of actions
that each individual must
take to change his or her
own behayior. This
requires acceptance of the
need of behavior change.
Talking about one's own
behayior and listening to
other's discuss their
behavior provides 'the
conditioning needed to
bring about and to re-
enforce behavior change.
Oxford House is called
by some "AA or NA in a
house" because peer
support is available 24
hours a day. However,
the indiyidual who does
not get into the habit of
going to AA or NA does
not prepare well for the
day he or she moves out
of an Oxford House.
6
The "Missing Link"
Because Oxford House allows an individual to heal from
addiction at his or her own pace, it becomes a missing link in
the treatment protocol for alcoholism and drug addiction.
Usually, an alcoholic or drug addict gets detoxified, receives
some treatment (education about the disease and motivation 'to
change behavior) and goes back to where he or she came from.
Since the "cure" is behavior change, it is difficult to become
comfortable with the new behavior in the old living
environment How do we know this to be true? Look at the
past attempts at sobriety.
Prior Treatment Record of Washington Stale
Oxford House ResidenlB (Percentage)
Number 0/ Sobriety Tries
WA
1996
18.3
26.3
'ZlD
ŒJS
18.9
WA
1996
15.9
20,6
29.6
14.0
19.9
Ore
Two
Three to Five
Six to Ten
Ma-than 10
Nearly two-thirds of us (64%) have had prior treatment three or
more times. One in fiye of us have been through a residential
treatment program ten times or more. We know, by
experience that going back to where we came from does not
work until we become comfortable enough with clean and
sober behayior to stay clean and sober. Oxford Houses
provide that time we need to become comfortable with sobriety.
Does Oxford House Work?
In the 1998 survey, 86% of the Washington State Oxford
House residents said that Oxford House was "Very Important"
to their recovery. (Only I % claimed Oxford House was
"insignificant" with respect to their own recovery.) When
asked if they would recommend Oxford House to another
recoyering alcoholic or drug addict, 97% responded that they
would. At least the residents of Oxford House believe that
Oxford House makes a difference.
Objectiyely, when one looks at the cohort group having been to
treatment ten times or more, it is interesting to note that the 65
individuals in that cohort haye more than 20 months current
sobriety. In each case that the "current sobriety" is the longest
period of abstinence eYer put together by members of that
group. For them, and many others, Oxford House has
become the "missing link" for moving from addiction to
comfortable sobriety without relapse.
ODD
:"
"
,
HOUSE EXPECTATIONS
The following list of House Expectations was devised and agreed upon by a unanimous vote of
the residents of an Oxford House on December 1, 1993.
The list consists of common-sense, everyday guidelines that help all of us. to be aware of the
need to respect each other. These guidelines are always subject to be revised as different
circumstances arise, with a majority vote at regular or emergency House Meeting.
At some of these we balked.........butL......
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
First (30) thirty days; no overnights outside the house Except (1) one night a
week with a reasonable curfew of 11 pm weeknights and 1 am on weekends.
House members will discuss any extended overnights outside the House.
Overnight guests: (2) Two nights a weed with the exception of house members'
children. (Children are allowed anytime if discus,ed with House members.)
If, for any reason you get a prescribed narcotic, it must be brought to the attention
of the house. No self-medicating - This is the same as USING!
If you are prescribed medicines by your doctor, you must stay on those medicines until
further proof from your doctor that he has taken you off the medicine-
Medicines are to be keptin your living area and out of view of other House members.
Attend Outside Support Group Meetings weekly.
Respect your house mates personal boundaries by treating them as you would like to
be treated.
Do not use anyone's personal items without permission.
Mark ALL your food items with your initials. Taking someone elses food without permission
constitutes theft and will be dealt with by the House residents.
Bedroom areas are private and should be respected.
If you make a mess, clean it up! including wiping bathroom tub, sinks, mirrors,
etc....kitchen crumbs, spills and any other items such as microwave, dishes, etc.
Personal items should be kept in their proper places (Le.: newspapers, magazines,
ashtrays, mail, etc.)
Do assigned chores completely and in a timely fashion. Respect other's chore time-
Deep shower time to a minimum. The next person likes hot water too!
Remove laundry as soon as it's completed- Laundry room time is 9am to 9pm.
Dishwasher hours: after 9am until1Opm, daily.
¡:
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Keep telephone conversations to 15 minutes; check message machine when you
complete your calls. Leave written messaGe to whomever has a recorded message.
You are responsible for your guests. Do not leave them unattended in the house.
NO active users in this house at ANY time-
If conflict arises, try to resolve it by appropriate mutual aGreement Do not allow
it to affect the entire household. If it is not possible to come to a mutually satisfactory
resolution, then both parties are responsible to go to the house president to discuss
the situation. ð!1 house members !!!sy be involved in resolving the problem.
Noise is to be kept to an acceptable level at all times. T. v.s to be kept at 25 decibels
or lower. Early morning viewing at 15 decibels.
If anything gets broken - Ax it, replace it or if it needs the house attention, notify
the house coordinator.
We have no bosses in this Oxford House. . We illl share the responsibilities of this
-- house for our benefit and personal growth.
Housemates shoUld be notified if you are going to be out overnight
Housemates should be notified if you are planning to be gone for severa! overnights,
vacation, etc_. and at least a week prior to leaving (i.e- chore scheduling, rent
payment, etc.).
Rent payable in checks or money orders (NO CASH). Approved agency payee
checks only are acceptable. Rent is due on the 1 st - 5th of the month unless
arrangements are made otherwise with the comptrollerltreasurer.
REMEMBER.... YOUR rent pays OUR rent.
Weekly house meetinGs are mandatory! House decisions are made at these times
and you are responsible to be here! Excuses for work, hospital or prearranged
absences only are allowed.
(1) Unexcused absences - $25.00 fine (Not calling or telling house.)
(2) Chore duties - (Incomplete or unsatisfactory chore duty_)
1 st Offense - Warning
2nd Offense - $5.00 Fine
3rd Offense (90 days) - $20.00 Fine - Write-up and/or (house meeting)
Ughts, TV_s. radios, etc. should be turned off when not in use.
Thermostat should be kept at 68 degrees during the day and 58 degrees at night.
Bedroom areas should be kept neat and clean at all times.
Be courteous when other housemates have already started cooking. Be patient
and - wait your turn-
r .
\ '
, 30.
31.
Interaction with each other is encouraged. Take time to share feelings, hobbies,
hopes and dreams with other housemates.
Disruptive behavior will constitute a house decision to place an individual or individuals
on a "Contracr.
32.
Phvsical violence will be dealt with as a Relapse.
The parties involved will be expelled from this house.
All house members must be called together to vote on these situations.
. RELAPSE No refund on deposit Refund on remaining rent (prorated).
33.
Two (2) week notice given when relocating from this Oxford House,
or no deposit refund.
Refund on deposit after ninety (90) days; (3) three months only-
Refund after all monies owed to house are paid.
34.
(1) House vote required on extenuating circumstances!
No firearms or ammunition allowed in house without majority house consent.
OXFORD HOUSE
'ü"OOlî! ~@IIiJ~lî!I?'ü"
IA @WiTlm @~ @1?lî!~'ü"D@IIiJ@ 1A1IiJ@ ~DIi'1J@IIiJ@
Recovery, Responsibility, and Replication
Started in the Washington. DC. area in 1975. Oxford House is a concept and system of self-run. self-
supported group housing for recovering alcoholics and drug addicts. The first house for thirteen men
opened a second house within six months. At present, there are over 630 Oxfdtd Houses for both men and
women in.39 states and 263 cities. As a result of PL 100-690. the Anti-Orug Abuse Act of 1988, the cost
effectiye, self-run. self-supported recoyety house is being replicated throughout the nation.
PoL. 100-690 requires each state to establish a revolving fund to make loans to cover the security deposit
and first month's rent for groups of recovering individuals who wish to start a recoyety home. Oxfotd
House provides each new group on Oxfotd House Charter and provides the new group with the know-
how and support to establish and operate a successful house.
The Charter is free, but there are three Conditions that each group must follow in older to comply with the
law and to keep its charter.
1. The House must operate using democratic procedures;
2. The Group must be finan~ally self-supporting, and
3. Any resident who relapses into using drugs or alcohol, must be immediately expelled.
Oxtotd House. Inc.. is a non-profit, tax exempt, publically supported corporation which acts as a umbrella
organization for the national network of Oxtetd Houses. It provides quality control by organizing regional
Houses into Chapters and by relying heavily upon the national network of Alcoholics Anonymous and
Narcotics Anonymous groups. While Oxfotd House is not affiliated with AA or NA, its members realize
that recoyety from alcoholism and drug addiction can only be assured by changing lifestyle through full
participation in AA and NA. In most communities. members of those organizations help Oxtetd Houses
get started and report any charter compliance problems with respect to a particular House. As soon as
Oxtotd House. Inc..hears of such problems. it takes corrective action because the good name of Oxford
House is an important factor in the recovety of thousands of individuals. .
Q-1. WHAT IS AN OXFORD HOUSE?
Oxford House is a self-run. self-supported recoyery house program for individuals
recovering from- alcoholism and drug addiction. Oxtotd Houses assure an alcohol and drug-free
living environment. There are no resident counselors in an Oxfotd House. '.
Q-2. WHO MANAGES AN OXFORD HOUSE? .
Oxford Houses are democratically self-run by the residents who elect officers to serve for
terms of six months. In this respect. they are similar to a college fraternity or sorority. Howeyer. if
a majority of residents belieye that any member has relapsed into using alcohol or drugs.
that person is immediately expelled.
Q-3. HOW LONG CAN ANYONE UVE IN AN OXFORD HOUSE?
A recovering indiyidual can live in an Oxtotd House for as long as he or she does not drink alcohol,
does not use drugs. and pays an equal share of the house expenses. The average 'stay is a
little over a year. but may residents stay three. four. or more years. There is no pressure on
anyone in good.standing to leave.
Q-4. WHY IS OXFORD HOUSE SELF-RUN?
Oxford Houses are self run because (1) this permits individuals in recoyery to learn'
responsibility, and (2) the cost associated with self-run housing permits extensive
replication pf houses. Each House is fully responsible for its own expenses and debts which will not
and cannot be assumed by the National Organization of Oxford Houses.
>' - .. Oxford House - The Concept -
A System of Operations and Traditions
.Page 2
Q-5. HOW CAN ONE GET INTO AN OXFORD HOUSE?
Any recoyering alcoholic or drug addici' can apply to get into any oxford House by filling
out an application and being interviewed by the existing members of the House. The
application is then considered by the membership of the House and if there is a yacancy
and if 80% of the members approve, the applicant is accepted and moves in.
Q.ô. WHAT IF THERE IS NOT OXFORD HOUSE IN AN AREA OR THERE ARE NO
VACANCIES IN ANY OXFORD HOUSE IN THE REGION?
Any Group of recoyering individuals can start a new Oxford House. All they need to do is to find a house to
rent in the name of the Group, and apply to Oxfoo House, Inc., fer a chatter. .
Q-7. IS THERE ANY RNANCIAL AID AVAILABLE TO START A NEW OXFORD HOUSE?
Yes, each most states have iri place a revolving loan fund that can make loans to cover the
first month's rent and security deposit (up to $4000) to rent a house in a good neighborhood.
The loan must be repaid by the group within two years in 24 equal installments.
Q-8. . CAN THE NEW HOUSE BECOME AFRUATED WTTH OXFORD HOUSE?
Yes, by simply writing or calling Oxford House to ask for a Charter application. Once that
application is completed and received by Oxford House, Inc., a 'Conditional Charter" will be be
granted to the house at no cost. A Permanent Charter must be earned by the House.
Q-9. CAN AN OXFORD HOUSE BE STARTED WITHOUT A LOAN FROM THE
STATE?
Yes, the prospective residents of the House can find a suitable house. rent it. put up the
security deposit and pay the. first month's rent themselyes. Oxford House, Inc. will
consider favorably a Charter application whether or not a loan is receiyed from the State.
Q-10. CAN BOTH MEN AND WOMEN LJIÆ IN THE SAME OXFORD HOUSE?
No. Experience has shown that Oxford Houses work for both men and women, but not in the same
house. .
Q-11. WHAT IS THE "IDEAL" NUMBER OF INDMDUALS TO MAKE A SELF-RUN,
SELF-SUPPORTED RECOVERY HOUSE WORK?
Experience of Oxford House has shown that from 8 to 15 members works very well. A house with
fewer than six individuals is difficult to maintain because of the small size of the group and the fact that
any vacancy causes a greater disruption of the financial welfare of the house. A Hoùse with less than six
(6) residents ¡¡¡m¡¡¡¡tand WIll not be recognized or Chartered by Oxford House and win not quaflfy for a loan.
Q-12.HOW MUCH SOBRIETY OR CLEAN TIME IS NEEDED BEFORE AN
INDMDUAL CAN BE ACCEPTED INTO AN OXFORD HOUSE?
There is no time limit. Generally an individual comes into an Oxford House following a 28-day
rehabilitation program or at least 1 D-day detoxification program.
FOR MORE INFORMATION WRITE OR CAlL;
. Financial Services Office I Oxford House, Inc..
P.O. Box 179
Great Falls, VA 22066-0179
(703) 450-6501
Loan and Charter Information Hotline:
Fax Hotline
1-(800) 486-6488
1 (800) 899-6577
--,.....