The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 01-15-2002 Special/Regular AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall January 15, 2002 (www.cifederal.wav.wa.us) ***** SPECIAL SESSION - 5:00 p.m. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER ARTS COMMISSION INTER VIEWS II. III. ADJOURNMENT ***** REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. PRESENTATIONS a. b. Outgoing Mayor and Deputy Mayor Recognition City Manager/Introduction of New Employees City ManagerÆmerging Issues: c. Oxford House Update Staff Report City Council Questions Citizen Comment (remarks limited to 3minutes per person) City Council Discussion (Note: Oxford House Update Packet will be available to public on Monday, January 14,2002) over please. . . IV. v. a. b. c. VI. a. b. VII. VIII. IX. a. X. CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor. please come forward to the podium. adjust the microphone to proper height. and state your name for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE {3 MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals. or are otherwise inappropriate. CONSENT AGENDA (Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval; all items will be enacted by one motion; individual items may be removed by a Counci/member for separate discussion and subsequent motion.) Minutes/January 2 2002 Regular Meeting Voucher Monthly Financial ReoortlNovember 2001 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Mayoral Appointments to Council & Regional Committees Arts Commission Appointments CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential LitigationIPursuant to RCW 42.30.110(l)(i) ADJOURNMENT .. THE COUNCIL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA" THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW-FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LIBRARY" YCa) MEETING DATE: January 15, 2002 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CATEGORY: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the regular City Council meeting held on Jaunary 2,2002 SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for pennanent records pursuant to RCW requirements. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nla PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye approyal of the meeting minutes of the City Council regular meeting held January 2, 2002." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~\ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05110/2001 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall January 2, 2002 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Qv.þ.f'\ Minutes I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Councilmember Park called the meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of 7:07 p.m. Councilmembers present: Councilmembers Dean McColgan, Mary Gates, Mike Park, Michael Hellickson, and Councilmembers-Elect Jeanne Burbidge, Linda Kochmar, and Eric Faison. Staff present: City Manager Dayid Moseley, City Attorney Bob Sterbank, City Clerk Chris Green, and Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE City Manager David Moseley led the flag salute. III. SWEARING-IN CEREMONY COUNCILMEMBERS-ELECT Jeanne Burbidge, Eric Faison and Linda Kochmar City Clerk Chris Green administered the oath of office to Councilmembers Jeanne Burbidge, Eric Faison, and Linda Kochmar. IV. SELECTION AND SWEARING-IN CEREMONY MAYOR AND DEPUTY MAYOR Councilmember Park opened nominations for Mayor. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED THE NOMINATION OF COUNCILMEMBER BURBIDGE FOR THE POSITION OF MAYOR. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes January 2, 2002 - Page 2 There were no further nominations. COUNCILMEMBER MCCOLGAN MOVED TO CLOSE THE NOMINATIONS; COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed 6-1 as follows: Burbidge Faison Gates Hellickson yes yes yes no Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes The main motion to appoint Councilmember Burbidge as Mayor passed 6-1 as follows: Burbidge Faison Gates Hellickson yes yes yes no Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes City Clerk Chris Green administered the oath of office to Mayor Jeanne Burbidge. Councilmember Park opened nominations for the position of Deputy Mayor. COUNCIL MEMBER KOCHMAR MOVED NOMINATION OF COUNCILMEMBER MCCOLGAN FOR THE POSITION OF DEPUTY MAYOR. There were no additional nominations. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS; COUNCILMEMBER HELLICKSON SECOND. The motion passed 7-0 as follows: Burbidge Faison Gates Hellickson yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes The main motion to appoint Councilmember McColgan as Deputy Mayor passed 7-0 as follows: Burbidge Faison Gates Hellickson yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes January 2, 2002- Page 3 City Clerk Chris Green administered the oath of office to Deputy Mayor Dean McColgan. At 7:25 p.m., Councilmember Park recessed the regular meeting for approximately fifteen minutes for a brief reception for the elected officials. At 7:40 p.m. Mayor Burbidge reopened the regular meeting. V. PRESENTATIONS a. City Manager/Introduction of New Employees City Manager David Moseley announced and welcomed new employee Erl Parloya, who has been hired as a combination inspector for the Community Development Department/Building Division. b. City Manager/Emerging Issues City Manager David Moseley announced that there were no emerging issues to report. VI. CITIZEN COMMENT David McKenzie, Myla Montgomery, Judith Carlson, Bob Dahl, Tom Jackman, Joan Tabrum, Embry Owen, Dean Owen, Kathy Frankin, Dayid Morris, Mike McLead, Lisa Wilhelm, Betty Wick, Vicki Knutsen, Glen Steele, Tom Melmon, Harry Reichenburg, Charmaine Marshall, and Dick Taylor spoke to Council in opposition to an Oxford House locating to Twin Lakes. Joe Dion, Dave Peterson, William Walker, Margaret Stergall, Gregory Eklund, Darleen Cady, Tom & Crystal Moehlman, and Dorthy Le, asked to haye written comments read into the record in opposition to an Oxford House locating in Twin Lakes. Bill May requested a liaison between the city staff and the yarious Homeowners Associations in Federal Way. Mayor Burbidge asked City Manager Dayid Moseley to respond to the citizen comments regarding Oxford House. Mr. Moseley briefly responded to Council, proyiding clarification to (I) the city's issuance of an administratiye clarification not variance, and (2) he noted the city has no authority to enforce Homeowners Associations Rules and Regulations. He also fully Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes January 2, 2002 - Page 4 committed to research and report back on all questions raised by Councilmembers and citizens at tonight's meeting. COUNCIL MEMBER HELLICKSON MOVED TO AMEND TONIGHT'S AGENDA TO INCLUDE OXFORD HOUSE DISCUSSION UNDER COUNCIL BUSINESS; COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SECOND. The motion passed 7-0 as follows: VII. Burbidge Faison Gates Hellickson Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes yes yes yes yes CONSENT AGENDA a. b. Minutes/December 18, 200 I Regular Meeting -Approved Council Bill #290/Code Revisions for Solid Waste & Recycling/Enactment Ordinance -Approved Ordinance #02-411 Council Bill #29l/Extension of City Solid Waste Utility in Annexed Areas/Enactment Ordinance Approved Ordinance #02-412 Council Bill #292/Portion of Milton Road South Street Vacation/Enactment Ordinance Approved Ordinance #02-413 City Manager Contract Amendment -Approved Teamsters Collectiye Bargaining Agreement -Approved c. d. e. f. COUNCILMEMBER PARK MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED; COUNCIL MEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed as follows: VIII. a. b. Burbidge Faison Gates Hellickson Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes yes yes yes yes CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS City Council Committee Appointment Considerations -No Action Taken Oxford House Disscussion -Added Item Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes January 2,2002 - Page 5 After a brief discussion, Councilmembers concurred to place this item on the January 15th City Council Agenda under emerging issues. Mayor BUlbidge requested City Manager Dayid Moseley to giye a staff report in response to the citizen's concerns stated at tonight's meeting. Ix. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Gates updated Council on upcoming yarious regional committees. Councilmember Kochmar thanked citizens for bringing their concerns to tonight's meeting, and reported on recent actiyities with the Airport Communities Coalition. Councilmember Park extended his congratulations to Mayor BUlbidge and Deputy Mayor McColgan. Councilmember Hellickson had no report this eyening. Councilmember Faison had no report this eyening. Deputy Mayor McColgan reminded citizens of the upcoming retreat, which will be held in Federal Way and encoUlaged citizens to attend. Mayor BUlbidge announced upcoming local and community events in the arts. x. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager announced the Ci~ Council would be having their annual retreat at Dumas Bay Centre, January II th and 12 . The Council will be discussing various items including capital facilities, police development reyiew, and council rules ofprocedUle. Mr. Moseley also reminded citizens of the annual Martin Luther King Jr. celebration on Monday, January 21 st at DecatUl High School. This year's theme is "Building Bridges- Breaking Barriers...Shaping the Dream"; the program begins at 10:30 a.m. He updated Council, noting the Leonhardt Group is in the process of conducting citizen focus groups as they continue to work forward in the branding process. City Manager Dayid Moseley further reminded Council of the need for an executiye session for the purpose of discussing Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.ll0(l)(b); for approximately twenty minutes with no action anticipated. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes January 2, 2002 - Page 6 XI. EXECUTIVE SESSION Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.11 O(l)(b) At 9:25 p.m. Mayor Burbidge announced the Council would be recessing to executiye session for the purpose of discussing Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b). After a brief extension, Council returned to Chambers at 9:56 p.m. XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Burbidge adjourned the regular meeting at 9:56 p.m. Stephanie Courtney Deputy City Clerk MEETING DATE: January 15,2002 ITEM# 1T[b) --------------------- ------------------------- CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VOUCHERS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: i:8I CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $1,521,182.85 $1,521,182.85 $ ---------------- ------------------------------------- ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST ---------------------- ------------------------ SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of peljury that the materials haye been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor perfonned as cribed herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Wa Washington, I am a 'zed to authenticate and certify said claims- ------ CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approye attached youchers pursuant to RCW 42.24 ---------------- PROPOSED MOTION: I moye approYal of Vouchers- ~~~~;;-¡;;~~~~~~--~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) ----------------- COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 P vchlst 12/l2/2001 15,57,50 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = === == = ~ == = = = = = == = == = = = = = = = = = = = = ==== = ==== === = === = = = = == = = = = == = == = ~ = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == == v~ucher ~ Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount 163501 12/03/2001 001411 POSTAL EXPRESS INC nU---UU- uunUU UU_h__-U_uuuuuu__uuu- uUu_uu- _uuuuu- uu_--_uuuu_--_uu_u__u uuu_u_hu- 163502 12/03/2001 006054 BRANDRUD FURNITURE, INC 163503 12/03/2001 000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUES 163504 12/03/2001 000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE BM211-4&2109 043278 111401-7 OCT 2001 FEE PET-OCT2001 163505 12/03/2001 001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS F OCT FEES 163506 12/03/2001 703053 BARRETT, MICHAEL 163507 12/05/2001 000947 YOUR INC DBA 163508 12/05/2001 000947 YOUR INC DBA 01-01-000257 2697 2696 045512 043037 042884 MSMD- POSTAGE & DUPLICATION/COUR 503 -11 00- 043- 512 - 50-42 5 503-11 00- 043- 518 - 92-42 5 503-1100- 043 - 521- 99-42 5 PWD-OFFICE CHAIRS 101-4200 - 22 0 - 54 3 - 3 0 - 352 MSF-REMIT STATE FEES 001- 0000- 000-23 7 -35- 000 001- 0000- 000- 23 7-41- 000 001- 0000- 000- 23 7-42- 000 001- 0000- 000- 23 7-44- 000 001- 0000- 000-237-46- 000 001.0000- 000-237-47 - 000 001- 0000- 000-36 9 -81- 000 MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES 001- 0000- 000- 23 7 - 70- 000 Total, Total, Total, Total, MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM FEES-OCT 001- 0000 - 000- 23 7 -43 - 00 0 MSRM-CLAIM#Ol' 01- 000- 257 501-1100- 043- 514 - 91-4 95 PKM-JANITORIAL SERVICES 505 -11 0 0 - 331- 5 7 6 -1 0 - 415 505-11 0 0 - 331- 576 - 8 0 - 415 PS-JANITORIAL SERVICES-NOV 001- 21 00 - 0 94 - 521-11-415 Total, Total, Total, Total, 1,804.95 7,867.34 1,816.66 11,488.95 326.40 326.40 153.00 30,189.64 15,391.88 6,815.47 2,684.85 1,371.99 0.01 56,606.84 488.00 488.00 1,156.91 1,156.91 907.39 907.39 300.00 330.00 630.00 1,305.00 1,305.00 _u- - _u - - - ----- --- ---- - ----.- - _u- -_u_-- -------_u_-__U___hU----_u_u_-_uu.___h_--U------- -----------------_u_u____h_h Page, 1 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,57,55 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 2 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO = == = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = == == = === == ==== === ===== == === = ==== = == ===== = = = = ===== = = = === = = ==== = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = Amount Description/Account --__----__h_-- ------------ ---------- ---------------------------------- u-----_u_- ---_u_u_-- u--_u_--------- 163509 12/05/2001 001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE SVC #734/-DEC PS 042911 163510 12/05/2001 005254 U S BANCORP 496005676064 163511 12/12/2001 000014 DAY-TIMERS INC 34506 045536 163512 12/12/2001 000029 KING BELLMARK OF PUGET SOUN 020518 045572 163513 12/12/2001 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY 032131 032017 031880 163514 12/12/2001 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 130132 132134 163516 12/12/2001 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 177-159-1003 PS- 9TH AVE BLDG LEASE 001-2100- 0 94 - 521-11-4 52 PS-MONTHLY VISA CHGS 001-2100- 092 - 521- 31- 318 001-2100- 093 - 521-26 -432 001-2100- 093 - 521-26 -433 001- 21 0 0 - 0 93 - 521- 27 -4 32 001-2100 - 093 - 521- 27 -436 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 318 001-2100-111- 521-22- 312 PWA-CALENDAR FILLER 101-4200-210- 543 -10-310 CDB - PRE INKED STAMP 001- 5200- 074 - 559- 6 0 - 312 PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER 001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 22 - 34 0 001-2100-111- 521- 22 -48 0 PS-RESP MSA CARTRIGES 001- 2100-111- 521- 22 - 34 0 001-2100-111- 521-22 -48 0 PS-RECHG EXTINGUISHER 001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 22 - 34 0 001-2100-111- 521- 22-48 0 PWS-SPRAY PAINT 101-4400- 24 0 - 542 -3 0- 3 51 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLY 401-3100- 64 0- 542 -4 5-319 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 001- nOO-333 - 576-8 0-4 n 001- nOO-333 - 576 - 80-4 72 505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 518 - 3 0 -4 n 20,345.92 Total, 20,345.92 189.98 311.94 36.00 0.50 97.67 37.98 78.27 Total, 752.34 35.89 Total, 35.89 29.08 Total, 29.08 7.33 7.32 214.83 214.83 89.52 89.51 Total, 623.34 19.73 8.69 Total, 28.42 5.47 1. 00 1. 00 - - - - --- - - - - -- - -- --- - - - ---- - - - - -- - - - - ---- _uu_u --- uh ------- - -- -- - - --- - - ---- - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - ------- - ---- Page, 2 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,57,57 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 3 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account Amount ----u_uu- -_u__uu _h_uuuu_uuh_-_uuu_uh- --_u__u_u uu_----u- - uuuu_uu_- 128.255-3948 505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 518 - 3 0 -4 72 505-11 0 0 - 331- 576 -1 0 - 4 71 505-11 00-331- 576 - 8 0-4 71 505-11 00-331- 576 - 8 0 -472 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 71 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 001.7100-333 - 576 - 80 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300- 23 0- 543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230 - 543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300- 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101- 43 00-23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300.230 - 543 -10 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230 - 543 -1 0-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -4 71 PKDBC/KFT- ELECTRICITY 402-72 00-101- 575-45-4 71 402 -72 00-352 - 575-4 5-4 71 PKDBC/KFT- ELECTRI CITY 402 - 72 00-101- 575-45-471 402 - 7200-352 - 575-45-471 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101.4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0 - 4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 163516 12/12/2001 (Continued) 954-567-1001 5.47 954-567-1001 5.47 342-691-1008 93.97 996-289-0001 130.62 352-691-1007 25.80 904-388-1003 137.41 738-448 -1003 58.64 131'066-1002 10,660.33 638.448-1005 78.19 536.673-1007 232.20 442.691-1006 25.80 190- 977 - 0008 753-129-1008 185.87 110.52 736-169-1004 143.36 993-440-2000 215.82 004-919-1000 32.91 311-112-7001 1,346.22 673.10 727-469-1000 1,393.45 696.71 699-699-1003 5.47 506.54 183-469-1006 147.01 183-469-1006 - - -- - - - - - - - - - - u - - _u u - u- -- u - - - uu- - uu_- - ------ ------ ------ ------ --- ------ Page, 3 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,57,57 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 4 """"" ~"""""" ~""" ~ ~ =~""~" ~""""" ~ ~"""= =" ~== == = = ="~= = ====== = ~=~ === = ==~=== = = =="=== = = === = ~~= == = = = == ~ == == = = = ~== = = = = == = = = = = = = == = = == ==== = === Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount --- dU-U- u_u__u- -_uuuu_---_u_uu u- u-_uu__u u_-_uu_u u_uu_u_uuuu_uuuuu- u 128-255-3948 101-4300-230- 543-10-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230-543 -10-471 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300- 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300- 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 MC-FACILITY ELECTRICITY 505-1100- 331- 512 - 50-471 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230 - 543 -10 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300- 230-543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 - 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 - 2 3 0 - 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543-10-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 - 23 0 - 54 3 -1 0 - 4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0 -4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PWT- STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-471 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 71 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101-4300-230- 543 -10-4 71 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-4 71 147.01 163516 12/12/2001 (Continued) 472-400-1005 72 .43 895-405-1002 152.62 252-150-2001 102.26 241-985-1007 192.10 525-940-2005 231. 80 233-930-2008 147.70 112-722-1008 236.03 925-940-2007 225.41 221-220-2002 5.47 889-288-1007 59.59 344 .75 625-940-2003 121-220-2004 6.15 886-203-1005 101.92 604-130-2008 257.33 652-017-1007 149.56 497-198-1008 110.23 225-650-2002 189.54 786-203-1007 106.08 487-650-2008 257.58 669-650-2001 380.69 420-530-2005 96.86 309.87 330-694-9979 223.62 168-847-1000 202.23 ---- - - - - - - - -- - - u - - - _u u- ._u - u__u" - u_- u u--- _u_---- u--- - u - _u_- _u u - - u- - - -.u - - - _u- - - uu Page, 4 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,57,58 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 5 0 ~ = 0 = = = = = 0 = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = == === === = = = = == ==== = = = ===== = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount _u__uu_u -_u._u_- uuu--------_uu_--_u__u----- uuuu__u -- .u--uu_uu_----_uuu----- uuuu_uuu 163516 12/12/2001 (Continued) 504-228-1005 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 001- 7100-333- 576- 80-4 71 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 001- 7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 71 1,834.36 303-218-1004 0.01 Total, 23,065.55 163517 12/12/2001 000058 SOUND OFFICE SUPPLY 10326 045556 CDB - MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 001- 5200- 074 - 559- 60-310 50.23 Total, 50.23 163518 12/12/2001 000089 NEWS TRIBUNE 420708 045577 PS-NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 001-2100- 094 - 521- 3 0-311 27.00 Total, 27.00 3075301 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001. 7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 73 PWS-WATER SERVICE 101-4400-240- 543 -10-4 73 PWS-WATER SERVICE 101-4400-240- 543 -10 -4 73 PWS-WATER SERVICE 101-4400- 24 0- 543 -1 0 -4 73 PWS-WATER SERVICE 101-4400-240- 543 -10-4 73 PWS-WATER SERVICE 101-4400- 24 0 - 54 2 - 3 0 - 4 7 3 PKDBC-SEWER SERVICE 402 - 72 0 0 -1 01- 575- 4 5 - 4 74 402 - 72 0 0 - 3 52 - 57 5 -4 5 - 4 74 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 505-1100-331- 518 - 30.473 505 -11 00- 331- 518 - 3 0 -4 74 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 001- 71 00- 33 6 - 5 7 6 - 8 0 -4 73 001- 71 0 0 - 3 3 6 - 57 6 - 8 0 -4 74 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 001-7100-336 - 576 - 80-4 73 001-7100-336 - 576- 80-474 PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS 001-7100-333-576 - 8 0-4 73 001- 7100-333- 576 - 8 0-4 74 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001-7100-333- 576 - 8 0-4 73 001-7100- 333 - 576 -8 0-4 74 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 73 322.99 163519 12/12/2001 000096 LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 3033601 3088801 70.26 3200201 201.23 3238401 81. 30 2573402 53.76 2961401 29.93 1768602 539.96 269.98 1639103 207.92 217.02 3075401 122.58 224.46 3075201 143.25 355.11 2926402 95.55 41.34 88.66 9.62 2926602 2,419.94 -_u - - - _u - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - - --u- -- ---- u__u---_u_----_u__u_--------_u_--_uu_--_u_--_u_-_u_-- Page, P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,00 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, Voucher Date Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = == = = == = === = = = = == = = = = = = === = = ==== = == = === = == = = === = = = = = == = == = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Amount --_u__n_U _n__n--- u--nn_nn___--n- 163519 12/12/2001 (Continued) 163520 12/12/2001 000097 EDEN SYSTEMS INC 163521 12/12/2001 000101 PETTY CASH --- - ------ - ___n_- --___u__n___n_____nn- Invoice PO nn n___nnn- nunnn_- 101103 99902 2957001 2049903 28830801 2798301 2926501 2781401 1014202 2592802 2781501 2906301 3042401 2961501 3050801 2890801 80406 2883701 11958 044124 12281 045663 Description/Account _nn_____unnn__un_n___- -___--n_n_n- PKM-WATER SERVICE 001- 7100- 333- 576 - 8 0- 4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001-7100- 333 -576- 8 0-4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001-7100- 336 - 576- 80-4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001- 7100-333 - 576 - 80 -4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0-4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001-7100-333- 576 - 8 0-4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001-7100- 333-576 - 8 0-4 73 001-7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 74 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001- 7100- 333 - 576 - 80-4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001- 71 00-333 - 576 - 8 0-4 73 001- 71 00-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 74 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001-7100- 333- 576 - 8 0-4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001-7100- 333 - 576 - 80 -4 73 PKM-WATER SERVICE 001- 7100-333 - 576 - 8 0-4 73 PWS-WATER SERVICE 101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-4 73 PWS-WATER SERVICE 101-4400- 240 - 543 -10 -4 73 PKCP-WATER/SEWER SVCS 001- 7100- 336 - 576 - 80 -4 73 PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS 505-11 00-331' 571-1 0-4 73 PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS 505-1100- 331- 571-10-4 73 PKRLS-WATER/SEWER SVCS 505-1100' 331- 571-10-473 14 .48 14.48 14 .48 4,706.85 364.13 373.18 5,509.74 77.94 145.61 65.35 46.22 14 .48 14 .48 341.13 361.04 152.89 13,825.00 19.78 335.40 98.55 31,990.07 Total, MSDP-EDEN SYSTEM UPGRADE-INSTAL 502 '1100- 049- 518 -88 -643 1,237.50 Total, 1,237.50 PWT - BATTERY FOR SIGNAL COORDI 001-1100- 02 0- 513-10- 318 001- 5200- 073 - 558 - 60-433 4.59 4. 00 --- --- -- ------ ------- - - ------- - --- - --- -- - - --- - -- --- - ------ - - ------ - - ---- Page, 6 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,01 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page' 7 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO == = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = == = = ==== === = === === = == == = == = == == = = = = = = = = = == = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = ==== Amount Descript ion/Account _u_-------- ---------- h-------------------------------- h---------- ------------ ----------------------_u_----- --------------- 163521 12/12/2001 (Continued) 12245 045662 163522 12/12/2001 000103 ICBO-WESTERN WASH CHAPTER 045571 12254 163523 12/12/2001 000105 ICBO-INTERNATL CONFERENCE 0 12255 045570 163524 12/12/2001 000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC 110241040 110301040 110301041 163525 12/12/2001 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12692 045492 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - ---- -- - - ---- - --- ----- -- - - ----- - - ---- ---.- - - - --------- 001- 52 00- 073 - 558 - 6 0-4 92 001- 5200 - 074 - 559- 6 0-31 0 101-4200 -210- 543 -1 0 - 318 101-4300 - 23 0- 543 -10 -312 101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -421 101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -433 101-4300 -23 0- 543 -10 -43 7 101-4300 - 23 0- 543 -10 -4 92 101-4300- 260- 543 - 30 - 318 119- 73 00- 961- 514 - 60 -437 CDHS - FLOURESCENT LABELS 001-1200- 084 - 557-20 - 310 001-1200- 084 - 557 - 20 - 318 001-5200- 073 - 558-6 0- 310 001-5200- 073 - 558 -6 0-431 001-5200- 073 - 558 - 6 0-4 92 001-5200 - 074 - 559- 6 0-431 001-7300 - 083 - 562 -10- 318 001-7300- 083 - 562-10-4] 7 101-4200- 210- 543 -10 -431 101- 42 0 0 - 21 0 - 543 -1 0 - 4 3 3 101- 42 0 0 - 22 0 - 543 - 3 0 - 4 3 7 101-4300-230- 543 -10-431 101-4300 - 23 0 - 543 -1 0 -433 401-3100- 62 0- 542 -41-437 401-3100- 63 0- 542 -48 -319 12.00 8.25 24.96 3.47 6.45 6.00 20.70 6.82 11.69 19.67 3.43 12.97 28.27 18.41 27.81 16.34 46.09 3.11 15.28 2.18 21.05 45.21 52.88 10.00 33.57 Total, 465.20 CDB - ANNUAL WA CHAPTER ICBO DU 001- 5200- 074 - 55 9- 60-4 97 30.00 Total, 30.00 CDB - ANNUAL ICBO DUES/MK MARTI 001- 52 00.074 - 559- 6 0 -435 35.00 Total, 35.00 PS-AIRFARE,OAKLAND 11/01/01 001- 21 0 0 - 091- 521-10 -434 PS-AIRFARE, ONTARIO, CA FROM SEA 001-2100- 091- 521-1 0-434 PS-AIRFARE, BSHOCKLY 11/01/01 001- 21 0 0 - 091- 521-1 0 - 4 34 198.00 498.00 498.00 Total, 1,194.00 SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES - - --- ------- - ------ - --- - - --- Page, 7 p vchlst 12(12(200115,58,02 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 8 "= = = ="" = =" = = ="" = = ="" = = = = = = = = == = == =="" =" "=== == = == == = = ====" ==== == == = == = == ======== = === = = ==== = = "=== = = = = = = = = = = = === == === === == = == == === = = === Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description(Account Amount u_u-_n--- _un-_n- nnn_nnnh--u_ununnu_- __u_un_n h__n__uu _n_____u-_nn_n___nnnn- __---nn_nh- 12696 401- 31 0 0- 64 0 - 542 - 4 5 - 312 PS-FORD KEY -SECONDARY 001-2100-111- 521-22 - 312 PS-OPEN DOOR, ADJUST STRIKE 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 312 PKM-ARROW(KSP(BEST(FALCON I.C. 001-7100-332 - 576 - 8 0-48 0 PKRLS-CAM LOCK 505-1100- 351- 571-1 0-48 0 225.09 6.86 12691 98.77 12707 25.13 12714 146.30 Total, 502.15 163526 12(12/2001 000152 ELECTRO PRODUCTS/CABLE CO 97964 045539 MSTEL- INET PROJECT FIBER PATCH 502-1100- 04 9- 518- 88- 642 191.68 Total, 191.68 163527 12(12(2001 000201 KINKO'S INC 515100059728 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-4 92 68.04 Total: 68.04 163528 12/12(2001 000202 QWEST 630-1529-268 MC- FAX MACHINE CHARGES 502 -11 0 0- 04 6 - 512 - 5 0 -42 0 MSTEL- PHONE (DATA SVC 502-11 00- 046 - 512- 50-420 502-11 00- 046 - 521- 99-420 502-1100- 046 - 528- 8 0-420 20.97 T02-8674-231 88.85 322.06 699.65 Total, 1,131.53 163529 12(12(2001 000229 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERC 1081 045567 CC- CHMBR LUNCH: JOANN PIQUETTE 001-1110- 010 - 511- 6 0-431 001-7200-352 - 571-1 0-431 85.00 20.00 Total: 105.00 163530 12(12(2001 000253 WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEP RE-13-ATB111 045509 PWCIP- INSPECTION 306-44 00-127- 595 - 64 - 520 249.72 Total: 249.72 163531 12/12(2001 000285 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT RENEW PERMIT CDB-FIRE PERMIT FEES 001-11 00- 022 - 512 - 50 -490 80.00 Total: 80.00 163532 12(12(2001 000286 METROCALL 050606922-28 MSTEL- PAGER SERVICE 502-1100- 046 - 528- 8 0-420 12.53 u- - - - - - u - u - - -- - - - --- - - nn - - - n- -- __un - - n h_n- - n- _u_n- - - - --- n - _n - -- - n- - n - _n- nn - -- _n- - - - - --- u_- _n _nnn- -n__-h Page: 8 p_vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,04 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 9 Voucher Date Vendor Description/Account === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = ==== = = = = = = = = = == == = = = == = = === ======= == = = == = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == == == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == ==== = = = = = == = Amount Invoice PO u_uu__u- _uu_u- _u_Uu__uuu_uuun_U__U_- UhUUUU uuuu__u Total, UU__U_----U---h U-_U-_hhu- 12.53 163533 12/12/2001 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO CDB - TITLE REPORT/VILLA DEL MA 001-5200- 074 - 559-60 -410 446852 045578 Total, 163534 12/12/2001 000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE PS-STORAGE RENTAL FEE/TRAFFIC 001- 21 0 0 -112 - 521- 7 0 - 4 52 DEC 2001 Total, 163535 12/12/2001 000385 ACCOUNTEMPS MSA-TEMP-A.ADEKOYA WK END,11/02 001-1100- 041- 514 -10-412 MSA-TEMP,A.ADEKOYA WK ENDED,10- 001-1100- 041- 514 -1 0-412 06462962 06462977 Total, 163536 12/12/2001 000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC PKDBC-VA PGT SND 12/3/2001 402 - 7200-101- 575-45-410 PKDBC-FW ARTS COMMISION 402 -7200-101- 575-4 5-410 PKDBC- COUNCIL COMMT MEETING 11 / 402 - 7200 -101- 575-45-410 PKDBC-SPECIAL POPS 11/15/2001 402 - 7200-101- 575-45-410 PKDBC-WORLD VISION 10/29-10/31/ 402 - 72 0 0 -1 01- 575 -4 5 - 41 0 PKDBC-VA PUGET SOUND 12/5-12/6/ 402 - 7200-101- 575-45-41 0 PKDBC-FW FIRE DEPT 12/5/01 402 -7200 -101- 575-45-410 PKDBC-KEPLER COLLEGE 12/2-12/9/ 402-7200-101- 575-4 5 -41 0 PKDBC-ST. MARK'S CATHEDRAL 12/1 402 -7200-101- 575-4 5 -410 PKDBC-CONSUMERS UNION 11/28-29/ 402 - 72 00 -101- 575 -4 5 - 41 0 PKDBC-WA SENATE DEMOCRATIC CAUC 402-7200-101- 575 -4 5-410 PKDBC-EVERGREEN EYE CENTER 12/8/ 402- 7200-101- 575 -4 5 -41 0 PKDBC- PGT SND WATER QUALITY ACT 402 - 7200 -101- 575-45-410 PKDBC-WORLD VISION 11/12-13/200 402 - 72 00 -101- 575-4 5-41 0 PKDBC-CONTEXT ASSC. 11/5-11/11/ 5318 5360 5339 5338 5307 5321 5320 5317 5316 5359 5313 5324 5327 5314 5312 359.04 359.04 155.00 155.00 1,192.34 984.64 2,176.98 192 .40 168.90 136.00 136.00 634.50 367.80 248.78 3,644.10 169.20 1,098.40 219.30 977.44 170.00 309.40 _u_- - - p-- ------ u_--- - U_-- - -------- _u__u_- ------_u_u__u_-----_u__uu_--_u__u_---------------_u_u_---_u_---------_u- Page, 9 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,05 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 10 . = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = = ==== == = = === === = == = == = = == == == = == = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account Amount -_u- u__u_u- __n_uu_uuuu_u_u_un__-U uu_uu_-- uuuuuu n_-UUUUUU_---_UUU_U- -_uuuu_u- 5325 402 - 7200 -101- 575-45 -41 0 PKDBC-PRH INSTITUTE 11/7-14/200 402 - 7200-101- 575-4 5 -41 0 PKDBC-FW ART COMMS 12/6/2001 402 - 7200-101- 575-4 5-410 PKDBC-SOUTHWEST AIRLINE 12/15-1 402 - 7200-101- 575-4 5 -410 PKDBC-VA PGT SND 12/12,13,19,20 402- 72 00-101- 575-45-410 PKDBC- VA PGT SND MENTAL HEALTH 402-7200-101- 575-45-410 PKDBC-WEYERHAUSER TIMBERLAND ST 402- 7200-1 01- 575-45-410 PKDBC-SOCIAL SERVICE LOBBYISTS 402- 7200-101- 575-4 5 -410 283.00 163536 12/12/2001 (Continued) 5311 88.40 5362 114.80 5328 5326 95.22 357.60 228.80 5323 200.64 5322 509.20 Total, 10,349.88 163537 12/12/2001 000428 WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASSOC 12176 045586 PKPL/WRPA EXEC FORUM 001- 71 00-334 - 576 -1 0 -432 320.00 Total, 320.00 163538 12/12/2001 000438 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONE 1932 045564 CC-AGENDA SETTING LUNCH 001-1110- 010 - 511- 6 0-318 34.10 Total, 34.10 163539 12/12/2001 000458 VILLAGE BLACKSMITH INC 1907 045639 PKMT/BPA 3 FIX BOLLARD 303-7100-119- 594 - 76 - 650 43.52 Total, 43.52 163540 12/12/2001 000475 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS 199819 PKCHB-ALARM MONITORING SVCS 505 -11 00 - 331- 518 - 3 0 -41 0 PKCHB-ALARM MONITORING SVCS 505 -11 00 - 331- 518 - 3 0 -41 0 PKRLS-NOV 2001 ALARM 505 -11 00- 331- 571-1 0 -41 0 103.00 203990 103.00 199716 59.74 Total, 265.74 163541 12/12/2001 000555 CRISIS CLINIC 2150 045494 PS-VICTIM ASSIST TRNG 001-2100- 093 - 521- 21-435 342.92 Total, 342.92 163542 12/12/2001 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 005-224-608 PKDBC-WATER SERVICE 402-7200-101- 575-45-4 73 273.58 U- - - - - _u u - u - -- - - u n - _uu - - u u u- ---- - uuu -- u- ----- -_u- un - u - u- _n - u - u_- Page, 10 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,07 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 11 = = = = = = = == = = = = === = = = = = = = = == = == = == == = = = = === = = = = === = = = === = = = == = == = = ===== == == = = = = = === = = = = === = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account Amount -----u----- ----_u_u --_uuuu_uu_uu_u_uu_uu uuu_uu- u---------- --_uuu_u__uuuuuu__u- u__uuu--_u 163542 12/12/2001 (Continued) 008-280-509 402 - 72 00-352 - 575-45-4 73 PKDBC-WATER SERVICE 402 - 72 00-101- 575 -45-4 73 402 - 7200- 352 - 575 -45 -4 73 PKKFT-FIRE SPRINKLER 402 - 7200- 3 52 - 575 -45-4 73 136.77 239.32 119.64 008-227-187 43.66 Total, 812.97 163543 12/12/2001 000667 RADIO SHACK 489906 045529 PWS - BATTERIES 101-4400- 240 - 542 - 30- 31 0 9.11 Total, 9.11 163544 12/12/2001 000671 H D FOWLER COMPANY 1067209 1067215 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES 001- 7100- 332- 576 - 80- 319 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES 001- 7100- 332- 576 - 80- 319 263.01 57.61 Total, 320.62 163545 12/12/2001 000721 AMERICAN CONCRETE INC 0076264 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 101-4400- 240 -542 -30- 3 63 401-3100- 640 -542-45- 3 63 PWS-2-4" Q PU 401-3100-640 -542 -45- 363 PWS-PEA GRAVEL 004310 101-4400- 240 -542 -30-3 63 SWM-1 1/4 PU 401- 3100-64 0 - 542 -45-363 401- 3100-64 0- 542 -45- 3 64 179.52 54.40 0075910 188.50 0076289 76.16 0076555 167.2S 193.88 Total, 859.74 163546 12/12/2001 000723 SOUND RESOURCE MGMT GROUP I FWP-015 042002 PWSWR-SOLID WASTE/RECY COLLECTI 106 - 3200-250- 53 7 -1 0-410 1,028.02 Total, 1,028.02 163547 12/12/2001 000730 ENTRANCO INC 36233 043562 PWSCIP-23RD AVE S RD IMPROVEMEN 306 -44 0 0 -1 0 9 - 5 9 5 - 3 0 -411 PW-EXP REV,HOYT CENTER 101-4200 - 22 0 - 543 - 3 0 -411 29,572.28 34852 043851 Total, 137.15 29,709.43 163548 12/12/2001 000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO !NC 5331495 5333332 045583 PKM- RAINBIRD REGULATOR/VALVE 303 - 71 0 0 -1 08 - 5 94 - 77 - 6 5 0 PKM- IRRIGATION VALVE 437.47 045611 ---- - - - - -- - - - --- - - - -_u - - - _u - - _u- - - --_u- - - --u - u---- u_u- uu_- _uu--- _Uu_- - uuu - _u- -- uu- u- - uu -- _u- u_u- Page, 11 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,10 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 12 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = === == = = = = == = = = = = = = = = ====== = == == = == ====== = === = === ==== = = = === = = == == == = == == = = = = = == = === == = = = = == == = === = == == == Amount --_u_------ --_uu--- uuuuu_---_u_u--u_u__u_u _u_u---_u uu_uUu- 163548 12/12/2001 (Continued) 5339551 045638 163549 12/12/2001 000809 ECONOMICS PRESS INC 5123589 045587 163550 12/12/2001 000872 STAR LAKE GREENHOUSE INC 4948 045610 163551 12/12/2001 000874 MACHINERY COMPONENTS INC 88697 163552 12/12/2001 000920 PAPER DIRECT INC 45453 045453 332823810001 163553 12/12/2001 000954 DNB MAILING SERVICES 5852 5853 045538 045537 163554 12/12/2001 000955 MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANY ABl11776S 045497 AB112051S 045520 163555 12/12/2001 001004 MAILMEDIA INC 36000 045602 163556 12/12/2001 001110 AMAYA ELECTRIC 6379-5 Description/Account n_---U---_U_------- --u_n___u__- 164.05 303-7100-108 - 594 -77 - 650 PKM- IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 001-7100- 332- 576 - 8 0 -315 Total, CDA - FIRST RATE CUSTOMER SERVI 001- 5200 - 071- 558 -1 0- 311 Total, PKM-DUSTY MILLER PLANTS 001- 7100-332- 576 - 8 0-313 Total, MSFLT-RANSOME MOWER REPAIRS 504-1100- 043 -548 - 78 -48 0 Total, PS-BLUE CERTIFICATES 001-2100- 092- 521-31-312 MSA-OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1100 - 041- 514 -10-310 Total, PWSWR-BULK MAILING SERVICE 106-3200- 259- 53 7-1 0-410 PWSWR-BULK MAILING SERVICE 106-3200 - 259- 537 -10-410 Total, SWMM-SAND & GRAVEL 401- 3100- 64 0 - 542 -4 5 -363 SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES 401-3100- 64 0-542 -4 5 -319 Total, PRCS-CLASS REG LTR 001-7200-352 - 573- 23 -421 Total, ELECTRICAL SERVICES 001-7100 -333- 576- 8 0-48 0 -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - u uu- - -_u _u - ---- - - - --u- _u- u u n-u _u_u - nnuu _u_- --_u - - - -_u- - - n_-- - - - u - - uuu 142.24 743.76 64.22 64.22 452.40 452.40 339.12 339.12 117.89 64.93 182.82 690.40 259.79 950.19 134.67 46.78 181.45 20.94 20.94 365.24 Page, 12 "". p vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,12 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 13 = == = = == == = = = = = = = = = === = === = = === === = = = = = = = = ==== === = = ==== = == = = = = === = == === ====== = = = = = == = = = = == = = = == = = = = = = ==== = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount ------------ ----_u_-- --------------_u_---------------- ------------ --- ----------u------------------- --------------- 163556 12/12/2001 (Continued) 001- 7100-336 - 576 - 80-480 401- 31 00 - 64 0 - 54 2 - 4 5 -4 8 0 505 -11 00 - 331- 518 - 3 0 -4 8 0 426.12 405.80 791.36 Total, 1,988.52 163557 12/12/2001 001166 PETTY CASH 012214 045546 PRCS-FOOD-YOUTH COMM 001- 72 0 0 - 3 51- 574 - 21- 312 001- 72 0 0 - 3 51- 574 - 21- 318 001-7200-351- 574 - 22 - 318 001- 72 0 0 - 3 52 - 571-1 0 - 312 001-1200 - 352 - 571-10-421 001- 1200 -352 - 573-21- 312 001- 1200 -352 - 573 -21-33 0 001- 1200 - 352 - 573 -23 -312 18.00 23.20 43.71 19.22 2.87 21.97 27.14 7.61 Total, 163.12 163558 12/12/2001 001174 PNBOA-PACIFIC NW BASKETBALL 11382 043663 PKRLS-BASKETBALL OFFICIALS 001-7200- 351- 573 - 63 -411 7,447.50 Total, 7,447.50 504917939001 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC 502 -1100- 046 -512 - 50 -423 502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 521- 99 - 423 502-1100- 046 - 528 -8 0-423 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC 502 -11 0 0 - 046 - 512 - 5 0 -4 23 502 -11 0 0 - 046 - 521- 99-423 502-1100- 046 - 528 - 80 -423 MSTEL- LONG DISTANCE SVC 502-1100 - 046 - 512 - 50-423 502-1100- 046 -521- 99 -423 502 -1100- 046 - 528 -8 0-423 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC 502 -1100- 04 6-512 - 50-423 502 -11 00 - 04 6 - 521- 9 9 -4 2 3 502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 52 8 - 8 0 -4 23 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC 502-1100 - 046 - 512 - 50 -423 502-1100 - 046 - 521- 99 -423 502-1100 - 046 - 528 - 80-423 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC 502-1100 - 046 - 512 - 50 -423 502 -1100 - 046 - 521- 99 -423 502-1100 - 046 - 528 - 80-423 MSTEL- LONG DISTANCE SVC 502 -1100 - 046 - 512 - 50 -423 1. 53 14.08 14.99 163559 12/12/2001 001233 A T & T BUSINESS SERVICE 510691538001 510645149001 2.41 22.13 23.57 504916115001 1. 21 11.18 11.91 51014612001 2.16 19.93 21.23 1. 58 14.54 15.48 510660202001 1. 53 14.08 14.99 584948549001 1. 53 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_u_---- --------- --_u--------------- Page' 13 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,13 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 14 = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = == = == = = = == == === == = = == == = = = ==== = = = === == = = == = = == = = === = = = = == = === = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = === Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account Amount uuu_u_-- _u_u-_u u_u_uuuuuu_uu_u_uuu- u---_uuu u_uu_-u- ---------------_uu--_u_u_-- uu_--uuu_- 163559 12/12/2001 (Continued) 510678441001 502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-423 502 -1100- 046- 528 - 8 0-423 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SVC 502 -11 0 0 - 046 - 512 - 50-423 502-1100- 04 6 - 521- 99 -423 502-1100- 04 6 -528 - 8 0-423 MSTEL- LONG DISTANCE SVC 502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 512 - 5 0 -4 2 3 502 -11 00- 04 6 -521- 99-423 502 -11 00- 04 6 - 52 8 - 8 0 -423 14.08 14.99 0 .76 7.04 7.50 510661494001 0.92 8.50 9.06 Total, 272.91 163560 12/12/2001 001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRA 035060 035061 043610 PKDBC-LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS 402 - 72 00 -101-575-4 5-48 0 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SVCS 001- 710 0 - 333 - 576 - 8 0 -48 0 1,711.95 043823 2,215.98 Total, 3,927.93 163561 12/12/2001 001358 DOUBLETREE INN AT PASCO 85339163 045114 PS-LODGING FEE, WASPC CONF 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-432 1,623.60 Total, 1,623.60 163562 12/12/2001 001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 24477 PWS - RECYCLED AS PHALT 101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-362 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-362 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 101-4400-240- 542 -3 0-362 PWS-RECYCLED BROKEN ASPHALT 101-4400-240- 542 - 3 0-362 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 101-4400 - 24 0 - 542 - 3 0 - 3 62 401- 310 0 - 64 0 - 542 - 4 5 - 3 62 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 101-4400 - 24 0 - 542 - 3 0 - 3 62 SWM-CLASS B ASPHALT 401-3100- 640- 542 -45-362 76.92 24476 574.25 24316 576.15 24315 . 50.16 24282. 25106 1,389.54 1,082.99 67.62 25445 94.82 Total, 3,912.45 163563 12/12/2001 001436 TREE RECYCLERS 11024CE 045522 SWMCIP-TREE REMOVAL 304 - 31 0 0-111- 5 96 -42 -41 0 PKM-REMOVE 2 ALDERS ALONG REDON 001- 7100-335- 576 - 8 0-48 0 PKM-REMOVE ALDER/LAKE GROVE PAR 001- 7100-335- 576 - 8 0-48 0 261.12 11116 045505 587.52 11023AS 045319 390.96 u---- - - ---_u_u - -_u_----_u_-- - --- -- - ------ - ------- - ----- - - - ---- - -- - - -- ---- - - - - - - - --- - ---- - --- - - --- -- - --- ------ Page, 14 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15:58:15 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 0 ~ 000000000000000000 00 ~ ~ ~oo = = = = = = = = = = == = === = = = = =~~ = = 0= 0== 0 0 = oo~=o=o = = =~= == =~ == == = 0 = = == == 0 = = == === 0 0 = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = ~ = =~ = = Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account Amount --_u_--_u- __U__h_- _hhUUU_UUU_U_------------ h_U_h___- -_uu_----- ---_u_------------------ U-hhUUhu Total: 1,239.60 163564 12/12/2001 001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3299392 042383 SWM-KITTS WETLANDS MONITORING 304 -3100- 500- 596 -42 -41 0 2,155.82 Total: 2,155.82 163565 12/12/2001 001592 UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY 2001 PLEDGES 045666 UWKC FAIR SHARE OF CITY OF FEDE 001- 0000 - 083 -367-10 - 000 845.25 Total: 845.25 163566 12/12/2001 001601 TAK INC 5614 045593 MSHR-2ND PG LETTERHEAD 001-11 0 0- 04 5- 518 -4 0-4 92 88.86 Total: 88.86 163568 12/12/2001 001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 218182-01 PS-BOOTS 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0 PS-CR FOR BOOTS INV 218182-01 001-2100- 094- 521-11-33 0 PS-SWAT TEAM CUST EMB 001- 21 00 - 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0 PS-MISC FOOTWEAR & ASSOC. 001- 2100- 094- 521-11-33 0 PS-SEW ON YRS OF SVC 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0 PS-FASTENERS & WORDING 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY, WMNS 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0 PS-REMOVE CLOTH INSIGNIA 001- 210 0 - 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0 PS-SHOE BLK PLN TOE OXFORD 001- 210 0 - 0 94 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-RMV/SEW YRS OF SVCS 001- 21 00- 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0 PS-GLVS,DR SKIN PATROL 001- 21 0 0 - 0 94 - 521-11- 3 3 0 PS-SHOE BLK PLN TOE CHUKKA 001- 21 00- 0 94 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-HELMET COVER, KELAR 1 S2 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0 PS- PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY 001- 21 00 - 0 94 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-BOOT 8 "BLK PLN TOE 141.39 218182 CR -41. 29 212985 408.00 218438 -41. 29 218393 11.42 213241-01 20.67 215904 234.90 216396 234.90 216044 8.16 216045 100.00 215462 6.53 216598 28.23 218876 100.10 214668 169.29 217379 234.90 218877 - --- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - U- - U - _u- - - U - - - - - - U - u__uu uu- U U U - - -_u - _u_u Page: 15 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,17 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page' 16 Voucher Vendor Invoice PO """" ~"~ ~"~ ~ = = ===" = "=== = =,= == ==" =" ""="""" === = = ===== == = = ==== == == == === ="== =""=""=== ===""" = """" ""~"=""""""""""" = =""" == = = = = = =" ~ = = = = = = = =" == Amount Date Descri pt ion/ Accoun t _--n__nu- n__-_-_-- -_---_nn_nn_nn_nnnn_nn nnnn_n- _nnnnn- ___n----n__--h-__-__- 163568 12/12/2001 (Continued) 215460 213241 214714 216600 216307 163569 12/12/2001 001715 TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN 95908 163570 12/12/2001 001856 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION 34003 043281 163571 12/12/2001 001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE 4004 043984 4003 043984 163572 12/12/2001 002093 RALEIGH, SCHWARZ & POWELL I 90701 045635 163573 12/12/2001 002137 INLAND FOUNDRY COMPANY INC 27651 045526 163574 12/12/2001 002351 CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONCRETE 12786 045493 163575 12/12/2001 002379 PACIFIC TOPSOILS INC 31556 --- - - - --- -- ----- - ___n____n_- - n_nn____n-u-_n_n_- ____n_n______--______n__- ------ ------ ------ - ----_____--n_- Page, 16 __nnn- ---nn--h--n 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-33 0 PS-REMV/SEW EMBLEMS ON GARMENT 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0 PS- PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-PANT, WOOL, SPD, NVY 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-FLSHLGHT HLDR 001- 21 0 0 - 094 - 521-11- 33 0 PS-SHOE LO-TOP 001-2100- 094 - 521-11- 330 100.10 13,06 352,35 352,35 47.76 97,87 2,579.40 Total, PKCP- PESTICIDE SVCS 001-7100-336 - 576 - 8 0-480 663.68 Total, 663.68 PWS-STREET SWEEPING SVCS 401-3100- 64 0- 542 -45 -48 0 2,961-20 Total, 2,961-20 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS 001-7100-333 - 576 - 8 0 -4 8 0 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS 505-1100-331- 518 - 3 0 -48 0 1,980,11 837.69 Total, 2,817,80 MSRM-ADD 99 CHEV/INSURANCE 501-1100- 043 - 514 - 76 -46 0 501-1100- 043 - 514 - 76 -4 65 501-1100- 043 - 521- 99 -4 6 0 1,069,00 219.00 8,930,05 Total, 10,218.05 PWSWM-HVY 3-BOLT DRAIN 304 -3100-111- 596 -42 -319 292.95 Total, 292.95 SWMM-CONCRETE MIX 401-3100- 64 0- 542 -45-364 183.87 Total, 183.87 SWM-SOIL/SOD DUMP FEES P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,18 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 17 ~~~ = = = = == = = = = = = == == == = = = = = = == = = = == = = = = == = = = = = === == == ==== = ==== ====== == = = ===== ======= == == = = = = = === = == = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = === = = = = == == = = = = = = Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount U_h__un- --h_-UU hhh_hhh_h_hh_hh_h__h- U_UUUh- -- hh_hhhh_hh-_hhh___h _hh___h__h- 30940 304 - 31 0 0 -111- 5 96 -42 -4 76 SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES 304 - 31 0 0 -111- 5 96 -4 2 - 4 76 SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES 304 -3100-111-596 -42 -4 76 SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES 304 -3100-111-596 -42 -4 76 SWM-BRUSH DUMP FEES 304 - 3100-111- 596 -42 -4 76 127.75 110.00 30945 110.00 30866 75.00 30859 75.00 Total, 497.75 163576 12/12/2001 002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO 107985 045636 PKM-CATCH BASINS W/GRATES 001- 7100- 332 - 576 - 8 0-361 201.81 Total, 201.81 163577 12/12/2001 002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 01F6210 045531 PWSWM-GLUE SEWER TEE 401- 3100- 64 0- 542 -45 -319 49.14 Total, 49.14 163578 12/12/2001 002534 ARBORS CAN INC 1761 045561 PKM/HAZARD TREE 001- 71 0 0 - 33 5 - 57 6 - 8 0 -4 8 0 979.20 Total, 979.20 163579 12/12/2001 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 1-306724 PKRLS- PEST CONTROL SVCS 505 -11 00 - 331- 5 71-1 0 -4 8 0 51.14 Total, 51.14 163580 12/12/2001 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT 12329 045654 PKM- PESTICIDE LICENSE/M BLACKSH 001-7100-310-573 -10- 318 001- 7100-331- 576 -10- 312 001- 7100-331- 576 -10-43 5 001- 7100- 331- 576 -10-4 3 7 13.06 9.01 25.00 93.84 Total, 140.91 163581 12/12/2001 002664 FLEX-PLAN SERVI':ES INC 35931 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVCS 001-1100- 04 5 - 516 -20 -41 0 MSHR-FLEX PLAN ADM SVCS 001-1100- 045- 516 -20-410 307.50 36487 283.50 Total, 591.00 163582 12/12/2001 002899 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC 0.2001012.0 039650 CDPL-ENV REV,HW PHASE II MONITO 001- 5200- 073 -558 - 6 0-411 1,661.44 _Uh---U---U-- - - - - - U - - - U - - - ----- - - _h h ___h- - hh- - -_U h - ___h - - - _h- __un - - -- --- - - - - - - - - - - -- - h U - h - - - - - - ----- - - - U- Page, 17 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,19 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 18 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = == = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = == ==== = = = = === = = = === = = == ===== = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = Amount PO Descript ion/Account 163582 12/12/2001 (Continued) 0.2001012.0 --_--H_U-- --uu---- u_uuuuuuuu_u----_uu_u ----_u_uu _--_HUUU uuu_u_--uu_uu_uuuu- --_uuuuuu 25.19 0.2001012.0 045614 0.2001012.00 039645 044917 163583 12/12/2001 002924 ST PAUL, THE GP06300439 163584 12/12/2001 002962 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 5440004 163585 12/12/2001 002966 RECYCLED PLASTIC MARKETING 10030 163586 12/12/2001 002985 ESRI INC 90475245 163587 12/12/2001 003001 SOUTH KING HUMAN SVCS COUNC SKCHS-AM-49 163588 12/12/2001 003035 GUIDANCE SERVICES INC S29707 S 29515 S 29424 S 29806 S 30016 S 30280 S 30147 _u- - - - - - _H --u - - H - u - - --u u - u_u - u--- - u- - u- _uuu- -- - _u - _uu- 045554 045569 045281 045566 045549 CDPL-WETLAND BIOLOGIST SVC 001-5200- 073 - 558 - 6 0-410 CDPL- ENV REV, DEVONSHIRE PRE - PLA 001- 52 00- 073 - 558 - 6 0-411 CDPL- ENV REV, MERIDIAN CT MONITO 001-5200 - 073 - 558 - 6 0 -411 Total, MSRM-DEDUCTIBLE/JORDAN CLM 501-1100- 043 - 521- 99 -4 95 Total, PS-EVIDENCE LAB SUPPLIES 001-2100- 093 - 521- 91-312 Total, PWSWR-COMPOST BIN DISTRIBUTION 106 - 3200-250- 53 7-10 -410 Total, MSGIS-ARCPRESS LICENSE FOR ARCG 502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 532 - 2 0 - 3 56 Total, CD/HS-MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 001- 7300- 083 -562 -10-497 Total, MSA-TEMP-WSCONWETTER 10/8-10-19 001-1100- 041- 514 -10 -412 MSA-TEMP,W.SHONWETTER 10/1-5 001-1100- 041- 514 -10 -412 MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 9/24-28 001-11 00 - 041- 514 -1 0 - 412 MSA-TEMP, W. SCHONWETTER 10/22-26 001-1100- 041- 514 -10-412 MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 10/29-11 001-1100- 041-514 -10-412 MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 11/13-16 001-1100- 041- 514 -10-412 MSA-TEMP,W.SCHONWETTER 11/05-09 001-1100- 041- 514 -10 -412 - - u----u - u- u _u u - - u - - _u--u ------ 1,268.25 1,025.81 3,980.69 10,000.00 10,000.00 91.26 91.26 35,496.67 35,496.67 1,520.51 1,520.51 50.00 50.00 821.70 430.65 485.10 311.S5 480.15 559.35 455.40 Page, 18 P vchlst 12/12/200115,58,21 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 19 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO 00000000000000000 = 0 0 0 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 = = = = =0 0 0 0 0 0 = = = = = == = = = = = = 0 0 0 0 = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 = =0 0 0 = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 = 00= = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 = Amount Descript ion/ Account uuuuuuun-_nHHUUUUU uuu_-_u- u_u_u_--- _uuu_uu___n---_uuu_- nnu___uuu uuu-_u 163589 12/12/2001 003085 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROU 806965 045401 163590 12/12/2001 003129 AMS LASER SUPPLY 318099 CM254971 319419 163591 12/12/2001 003130 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER IPS-TRAINING 045540 PS-TRAINING 045600 163592 12/12/2001 003270 SEBRIS BUSTO PS 30983 039686 076923 044867 173674-0 173674-1 175775-1 175775-0 WO295730 045544 163593 12/12/2001 003275 INTOXIMETERS INC 163594 12/12/2001 003325 CHUCKALS INC 163595 12/12/2001 003352 MOTOROLA INC MSDP Ips MEMORY 502 -1100- 046 - 518 -88 -3 57 502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-3 57 MSDP- PRINTER TONER 502-1100- 046- 518 - 88 -316 MSDP- PRINTER TONER 502-1100 - 046- 518-88 - 316 MSDP-PRINTER TONER 502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 518 - 88 - 316 PS - FBINAA TRAINING 001- 21 0 0 - 0 91- 521-10 - 4 3 5 PS - FBINAA TRNG LUNCHEON 001-21 00- 091- 521-10 -435 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES 001-1100- 051- 515-20-410 PS-PBT ALCO-SENSOR III 001-2100 -112 - 521- 7 0 - 3 54 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-11 00- 022 - 512 -50-310 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 50 - 31 0 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 - 31 0 MC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-1100- 022- 512 - 50- 310 MSDP/PS VRM REPAIR 502-1100- 046 - 521- 99-319 Total, 3,544.20 114.00 71 7.23 Total, 831.23 118.48 -133.79 276.30 Total, 260.99 25.00 25.00 Total, 50.00 771.50 Total, 771.50 768.59 Total, 768.59 27.99 72.67 15.91 86.42 Total, 202.99 386.24 --- - - ---- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - _u -- ----u - - - -----_u _u_--- uuu u--- u ---- - u u_--- uu - - -_u - u ---- - - - - u- -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - u - - - - - u - -- Page, 19 ... P vchlst 12/12/200115,58'22 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 20 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = === ===== = = = === == = == === === === == ===== == == == = = = = = == == = == = = = = == === = = = == ==== = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descri pt ion/ Accoun t Amount _uu__uu- h_h-h_- hh_h_U_--_____hhhh_h_hh h_Uhh_h hhhhhh hU_hhUUhh_hUUU__h- ----h_U_hh- Total, 386.24 163596 12/12/2001 003386 PEREZ, RICK TRVL REIMB TRAVEL REIMB, MARCH 25-28 101-4300-230- 543 -10-431 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-432 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-434 101-4300-230- 543 -10-43 6 101-4300-230- 543 -1 0-439 145.00 775.84 173.50 25.50 40.23 Total, 1,160.07 163597 12/12/2001 003426 SCHENKEL, KEITH PS-REIMBURSE 045547 PS-REIMB,RENTAL CAR EXP 001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 22 - 4 3 6 217.40 Total, 217.40 163598 12/12/2001 003444 WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS NOV 2001 PS-UNIFORM CLEANING 001-2100 - 094 - 521-11-415 649.07 Total, 649.07 163599 12/12/2001 003593 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LAB INC 0264601-IN 045582 PS-EVIDENCE TAPE 001-2100 - 093- 521- 21- 312 001-2100 -111- 521-22 - 312 185.39 111.60 Total, 296.99 163600 12/12/2001 003645 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE 1850-1862 043199 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT SVCS 402- 7200-101- 575-4 5-415 402 -72 00 -3 52 - 57 5 -4 5 - 415 4,073.85 3,230.00 Total, 7,303.85 163601 12/12/2001 003697 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 3001451-01 045548 SWMM-MISC. SUPPLIES 401-3100-640- 542 -4 5-33 0 175.88 Total, 175.88 163602 12/12/2001 003730 LE MONS, ROBERT C 01-1416 045543 PS- INTERPRETER SERVICE 001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 2 2 - 41 0 180.00 Total, 180.00 163603 12/12/2001 003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE F65S8V461 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 001-2100- 093 - 521- 91-421 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 001-2100- 093 - 521- 91-421 12.96 F6588V441 34.78 - - - h - - - - U - - U - - -- - h - - - - - hh - - h - - - hU - - - - - hhhh h- h___- hU- h h U h _h_h ___Uh h - - - - - - - - h_- - -- Page, 20 .~ P vchlst 12/12/200115,58,24 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 21 Voucher = = = = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === == = = ========= = === = = = == == == = = ==== = = == == = ===== = ====== = === === == == = = = = = = == = = = == = = = = == == = = = = = = = = = === = ==== Amount Date Vendor Description/Account Invoice PO _uun___n u--nnn _---nnun 163604 163605 163606 163607 163608 163609 163610 163611 _nn_U_un nnnnnn nnnUn_- nnnnnnnuu_-__--nuu- nn_nnUnu Total, 47.74 12/12/2001 003841 TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WA INC 3336-5 044769 PKM-SANITATION SERVICES 001- 71 00-333 - 576 - 8 0-453 382.50 Total, 382.50 12/12/2001 004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT D 10140112 10140113 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 001-2100- 093 - 521-23 - 354 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 001-2100- 093 - 521- 23 - 354 52.84 244.56 Total, 297.40 12/12/2001 004093 QWEST INTERPRISE D08-6046-046 MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES 502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-420 502 -1100- 046 - 528 - 8 0-420 MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES 502-1100- 04 6 - 521- 99-420 502-1100- 046 - 528 - 8 0-42 0 64.74 397.71 64.74 397.71 008-6046-046 Total, 924.90 12/12/2001 004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERNATION 4348 045474 PKDBC/KFT-ENVELOPES 402 - 72 0 0-1 01- 575 -4 5 - 31 0 402-7200-352 - 575 -4 5- 310 80.09 80.07 Total, 160.16 12/12/2001 004209 WLEEA (WA LAW ENFORCEMENT) 045621 PS-EXPLORER ACADEMY 001- 2100-112 - 521- 71-435 1,470.00 PS-EXPLORER Total, 1,470.00 12/12/2001 004218 TIMCO INC 045504 PWS-MISC. SUPPLIES 101-4400-240- 542 - 6 6 -354 3.95 71008 Total, 3.95 12/12/2001 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 003440 MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTISEMENTS 001-1200- 044 - 514 -3 0-443 MSC-LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS 001-1200- 044 - 514 -3 0 -44 0 290.85 63.25 003382 Total, 354.10 12/12/2001 004302 FEDERAL WAY NEWS 045568 CM-FED WAY NEWS SUBSCRIPTION 001-1100- 02 0 -557-2 0 -311 24.00 FW-C M - n n n n - - - u - n - - - - u - - - u - - - - u u - - - n n n u - - - - u --- - - - - - ----- nn___n____n_- ___n__n_u______un nnn_n_n Page' 21 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,26 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 22 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = ==== = = = ==== = === ==== = = === = = == = = = = = = == = = ==== = = ==== === = === = = = === = == = = ===== == = = = = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = = Amount PO Descript ion/Account --_u_------ uu_----- nnnnu-nnnnnnuUn_nn nnnnnn nnnHuu u_nnnnnnnU_hhuh-n n_-_U__hu_- 163612 12/12/2001 004356 SUMPTER, KYLE PS-REIMBRS 163613 12/12/2001 004360 NATIONAL CONCRETE CUTTING I 19107 163614 12/12/2001 004364 CENTRE AT NORPOINT 4550 163615 12/12/2001 004397 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 12- 2 163616 12/12/2001 004409 INGHAM, BARB PRCS -REIMB 163617 12/12/2001 004412 CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS SALE 165-01 186 - 01 163618 12/12/2001 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 00002517 00002523 0002516 00002518 00002522 00002519 00002514 045601 045498 044209 045542 041738 044133 043374 039674 043358 040883 044258 Total, PS-REIMB,WSTOA TRAINING 001- 2100 - 094-521-24 -435 Total, SWMM-CUTTING SERVICE 304 -3100-111- 596 -42 -319 Total, PKRLS-WATER AEROBICS CLASSES 001- 7200-351-574 - 21- 519 Total, PW-EXP REV, ST FRANCIS HOSP AMBU 101-4200-220- 543 -3 0-411 Total, PRCS-PRESCHOOL FROG 001- 72 00- 3 52 - 574 - 2 3 - 3 54 Total, PS-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 504 -1100- 043- 521- 99-48 0 PS-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 504 -1100- 043 - 521- 99-48 0 Total, CDPL-MISC CODE AMENDMENTS 001- 5200- 073 - 558 -60-411 CDPL-EXP REV,U-HAUL FACILITY 001- 5200- 073-558 - 6 0-411 CDPL-PLN REV, PAVILION CENTRE II 001- 5200 - 073-558 - 6 0-411 CDPL- PLN REV, KELLER SUBDIVISION 001- 52 00- 073- 558 - 6 0-411 CDPL- PLN REV, QUADRANT ECCP PARC 001- 5200- 073 -558 - 60-411 CDPL-PLN EXP REV , NEW HIGH SCHOO 001- 5200- 073- 558 - 6 0-411 CDPL-EXP REV,GLENWOOD PLACE APT 001- 52 00- 073 - 558 -60-411 24.00 140.00 140.00 391.68 391.68 84.00 84.00 1,180.62 1,180.62 119.67 119.67 1,460.06 2,235.64 3,695.70 1,587.57 742.50 260.40 274.56 5.28 2,526.30 265.58 - - - - - - un - n- - n - - U - - - _un - nn - - - - nn- nn- n- nn - _Ph n n_n - __n - n_h- nn - - n- nn - - - nnn- un hn n- nh ___n- Page, 22 P vchlst 12/12/200115,58,27 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 23 Voucher = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = == = = == == = = = == = = = = == = = = = = = == = = == = == = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = == Amount Date Vendor Invoice PO 163618 _UU_h---- hh___-U --hUhhUU __UhhUh_hUh __--_hhh- h 041975 163619 163620 163621 163622 163623 163624 163625 163626 12/12/2001 (Continued) 00002513 045592 045467 043756 045470 12/12/2001 004716 PACIFIC TRANSFER LLC MVGATVN11150 045545 Description/Account - hU__hhh__hhhhhh_hh --hhh_hhh 517.44 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV, FOSS 001- 52 00- 073 - 558- 60-411 PS-TECH SUPPORT: EQUIFAX 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-410 Total: 6,179.63 12/12/2001 004550 SOFTECH INC 99051 60.00 Total: 60.00 12/12/2001 004601 COMMERCIAL SOUND/COMMUNI CAT 026040 12/12/2001 004637 SWINGWERK GOLF INSTRUCTION AG98-192c PKKFT-SERVICE CALL: THEATRE SOliN 402- 72 0 0-352 - 575-4 5 -480 PKRCS - GOLF LESSONS 001-72 00 -351- 573 - 62 -411 001-72 00 - 351- 573 - 63 -411 MSGAC-DMX MUSIC SVC 502 -1100- 046 - 519- 91-414 PS-LUNCH: OFFICER PATROL 001- 21 0 0-111- 521- 2 2 - 318 PS-LUNCH: OFFICER PATROL 001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 2 2 - 318 MSTEL- CELLULAR AIRTIME 502 -11 0 0- 04 6 - 521- 9 9 -4 24 502 -11 0 0 - 04 6 - 52 8 - 8 0 -424 247.52 Total: 247.52 12/12/2001 004669 AT&T BROADBAND 016-0367712 879.75 879.75 Total: 1,759.50 12/12/2001 004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION SERVI 111501DECFWT 1205FWPD NOV 12/12/2001 004701 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 0002682579-4 130.00 Total: 130.00 12/12/2001 004704 FARR, CHERYL J 12067 213.05 132.65 Total: 345.70 945.95 532.10 Total: 1,478.05 LAW-COURT TRANSCRIPTION FW V. K 001-1500- 052- 515-10 -41 0 PS-MOVING EXPENSE: KWONG 001-2100- 094 - 521-11-41 0 - ---- - - -.. - - - - - - - - _hU - - h Uh h- UU - _uu ----_u- ___Uh _h_U h Uh_h__--_- ---- - ----- 52.50 Total: 52.50 1,599.98 Total: 1,599.98 _U_--- --,,------Uh___-U_h Page: 23 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,28 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 24 Voucher 00 = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = 0 == = = = === == === = === === = ==== = == === = ==== = = ==== = === == = = = = = === = = 0 = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == = = = == == Amount Date Vendor Invoice ---- ------------ ------------ -------------------_------hh- -------h------ 70.00 163627 ------------ ---------- --------_--------h 12/12/2001 004748 KING COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION 12252 163628 163629 163630 163631 163632 163633 12/12/2001 004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 100577 12/12/2001 004849 SAMS SANITARY & MAINTENANCE 58336 58235 59079 12/12/2001 004910 FILETEX LLC 01-552 01-536/528 12/12/2001 004977 BLIMPIE SUBS & SALADS 8054 12/12/2001 005008 LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES PS-TRAINING PO 045573 045598 045589 045588 045562 045575 12/12/2001 005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST IN 22306820-001 045612 21538664-001 21593654-001 21793576-001 21555274-001 22242032-001 --- -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - ---- -- --- -- - - --- -- - - --- - -- 22095686-001 ------- - - - ---- ----- ----- --- - --- - - ----- - - --- - - - - ---- - -- Page, 24 Description/Account CDB - CONFERENCE REGISTRATION/C 001- 5200- 074 - 55 9 - 6 0-435 Total, 70.00 MSDP/PW POWER INVERTER 101-4200-220- 543 -3 0-352 1,015.35 1,015.35 Total, PKDBC-HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES 402- 7200 -1 01- 575-45-314 PKM-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 001- 7100-332 - 576 - 8 0- 314 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 505-1100- 331- 518 - 30 - 314 615.48 129.08 129.08 Total, 873.64 CDA - LASER PRINT COLORCODED LAB 001- 5200- 071-558 -10-31 0 CDA - LASER PRINT COLOR CODED LA 001- 5200- 071- 558 -10- 31 0 67.11 104.45 Total, 171.56 CC- REFRESH. FOR CC MTG 001-1110- 01 0 - 511- 60-318 56.80 Total, 56.80 PS- POLICE LIABILITY SEMINAR 001-2100- 0 91- 521-10-4 3 5 269.00 Total, 269.00 PKM-RENTAL OF MINI EXCAVATOR 303 - 7100-1 08 - 594 -76- 6 5 0 PWS- PROPANE FOR POWER 101-44 00-24 0- 542-3 0- 3 62 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES 101-4400 -24 0- 542 -3 0-3 51 SWM-CONCRETE SAW RENTAL 304 - 31 0 0-111- 5 9 6 -4 2 - 4 53 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES 101- 44 0 0- 24 0 - 54 2 - 3 0 -4 53 SWM-EQ RENTAL, CONCRETE SAW 401- 31 00 - 64 0 - 542 -4 5 - 4 53 PWS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES 218.40 29.92 10.55 60.06 245.36 142.01 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,30 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 25 Voucher == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = ==== = == = = == == = = === = = = = = == = = = === = = = == == ===== = = = = = == == = = === = == = == = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == Amount Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account 163633 ----- ---------- _u----u-----u-----u----u----- ----u_----- ------------ --_H-_------------------------ --------------- 10.07 163634 163635 163636 163637 163638 163639 163640 163641 163642 12/12/2001 (Continued) 12/12/2001 005025 PCCI 12010-B 043193 045519 045630 045550 045496 045468 045576 045533 - ----- ----- - - ---- --- ------------ -_u_- ---------------------_u----------------- 12/12/2001 005043 MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT 30WO0202369 t0970001 12/12/2001 005059 TIRE DISPOSAL & RECYCLING I 59224 12/12/2001 005076 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC 0029271-IN 12/12/2001 005131 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION INC 9008 12/12/2001 005160 MOSELEY, DAVID 12249 12/12/2001 005195 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 394465 12/12/2001 005231 ros CAPITAL INC 53204713 12/12/2001 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIONS & 06417 401-3100- 64 0- 542 -4 5- 319 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SVCS 505-1100- 331- 518 - 3 0 -415 SWMCIP-MISC. REPAIR 304 -31 00-111- 596 -42 - 319 PKM-TRENCHER RENTAL 303 - 7100-108 - 5 94 - 77 - 650 PWSWR-TIRE DISPOSAL 106 -32 00-259-53 7-10-410 PS-SRT QUALIFICA TARGETS 001-2100- 094 - 521-24 -312 Total, 716.37 1,796.00 Total, 1,796.00 202.46 244.80 Total, 447.26 439.50 Total, 439.50 70.45 Total, 70.45 PKKFT-TEST /SERVICE, FIRE SPRINKL 402 -72 00 -352- 575-4 5 -410 CM-MILEAGE REIMB, MOSELEY 001-1100- 020 - 513 -10-433 001-1100- 020 - 513 -10-43 7 PWS-CONF.JOHN MULKEY 101-4400-240 - 542 - 3 0 -435 MSM&D- COPIER RENTAL 503-1100- 043 - 512 - 50-453 503 -11 00 - 043 - 518 - 7 0 -4 53 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT SVC 565.76 Total, 565.76 23.00 175.61 Total, 198.61 Total, 1,890.00 1,890.00 Total, 840.44 1,814.43 2,654.87 ------------------------_u Page, 25 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,32 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 26 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == == = = = === = = = == === == = == = === == = === = = = == = == = ======= = = == = = = == = ==== = == = === = == = = = = = = = == = == = = = = = == = = = = = ==== = = = === Amount n~U--U~-- U~UU_-- _nu----_--uu~uuuuu~uuu _u uuuuu~- D6416 D6416~2 163643 12/12/2001 005306 VICTORIA A INC 000445 045552 163644 12/12/2001 005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 8222873 163645 12/12/2001 005345 PUGET POSTINGS 1479 163646 12/12/2001 005382 ARTCO SIGN COMPANY INC 4226 163647 12/12/2001 005392 WAYNE INVESTIGATIONS 0015 040553 163648 12/12/2001 005406 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL SEPT-NOV '01 163649 12/12/2001 005439 FREEBORN, SUE PRO TEM 163650 12/12/2001 005470 MIRAI ASSOCIATES #1 AG01~118 045187 Description/Account ~~~u~~~~uuuuu~~~ -_u__uu_u_- 131.00 505-1100-331- 576- 80-41 0 SWM-NOVEMBER 2001 101-4400 - 24 0 - 542 - 3 0 - 42 0 401-3100- 64 0 - 542 -45-42 0 SWM-OCTOBER 2001 101-4400 - 24 0 - 54 2 - 3 0 -42 0 401- 31 0 0 - 64 0 - 54 2 - 4 5 - 4 2 0 PS-REPAIR LEATHER JACKET 001-2100-112 - 521- 70 -33 0 PS- FUEL FOR VEHICLES 504 -11 00 - 04 3 - 521- 9 9 - 32 0 MC-JURY SOURCE LIST 2001 001-11 0 0- 02 2 - 512 - 5 0 - 312 PKRCS-STONEWORK ON MONUMENT 402 - 72 0 0 -1 0 1- 575 -4 5 - 630 402-7200- 3 52 - 575-45- 63 0 CDB- LEGAL PROCESS SERVER 001- 5200- 074 - 559 - 60-411 PKRCS-MARTIAL ART CLASSES 001- 72 00 - 3 52 - 5 74 - 2 3 - 41 0 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{DATE} 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-410 70.37 70.38 153.62 153.63 Total, 579.00 163.20 Total, 163.20 23.39 Total, 23.39 216.00 Total, 216.00 Total, 2,393.60 2,393.60 4,787.20 300.00 Total, 300.00 2,537.20 Total, 2,537.20 112.50 Total, 112.50 PWT-TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE (TIF) ST 101-4300-239 - 543 -10-411 1,707.20 n- -~ ~- - - - - u~ - - - - ~_u - - - u- - - - - n- - - - - ~-~- ~ ~--u uuu u_u- - - u- u__u - - - _uu - - - - - _u - - u~- - - - - u - ~ - n ~ ~- -- -- - - ~- ~ ~ ~--- uu uu_- Page' 26 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15: 58: 34 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 27 Voucher """"""""" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~"~~~" ~"~== == ==== == == = == == ="=~ ==== ===== == = = = == = == = = = = = = =" = = = = = == = = = = ="==== Amount Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account --_u------- ---------- ---------------u_------u_------- ------------ ------------ _uu-------------------------- --------------- 163651 163652 163653 163654 163655 163656 163657 163658 12/12/2001 005536 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 1001350053 045517 12/12/2001 005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DIVIS 200754 SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES 401- 310 0- 63 0 - 54 2 -4 8 - 3 54 PS-SUPPLIES: FLEET 001- 21 0 0-111- 521- 22 - 312 MSTEL-SYS MAINT 502 -1100- 046- 512 - 50-4 8 0 502 -1100- 046 - 521- 99-4 8 0 502 -1100- 046 - 528 - 8 0-48 0 MSTEL-SYS MAINT 502 -1100- 046 - 512 - 50-48 0 502 -1100- 046 -521- 99-48 0 502 -1100- 046 - 528 - 80-480 PS-REIMB:BOOT ALLOWANCE 001- 2100-111- 521-22- 33 0 Total: 1,707.20 127. 04 Total: 127.04 57.75 Total: 57.75 12/12/2001 005587 AVAYA INC 12/12/2001 005599 VAUSE, GREG 12/12/2001 005602 SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES 12/12/2001 005609 BUCK, PEGGY 045574 2712040900 2711571834 PS-REIMB 045551 10957 042319 PKM-REIMB 045644 12/12/2001 005648 UNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY 2001 DONATIO 045667 12/12/2001 005671 GLACIER NORTHWEST INC 36908 045495 79.48 834.50 1,072.93 79.48 834.50 1,072.93 Total: 3,973.82 100.00 Total: 100.00 PKC-CELEBRATION PK MITIGATION M 001-7100-333 - 576 - 80-48 0 2,974.47 Total: 2,974.47 PKM- PK & REC COMMISSION FOOD IT 001- 71 0 0- 31 0 - 573 -10- 318 80.34 Total: 80.34 UWPC FAIR SHARE OF CITY OF FEDE 001- 0000- 083-367-10- 000 SWMM-TOOLS 401-3100- 640- 542 -45-351 845.25 Total: 845.25 18.33 Total: 18.33 -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - --- - - - - - ---- - - u -- - - - ---- - - ---- ------ -- - ---- - - ----- - - ---- - - - - u-- - -- --- ---- - - - - - -- -- u - - - - - -- ------ ------- - -- Page: 27 p vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,36 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page' 28 Voucher ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ = == = = ~ ~~ ~ ~ = == = ~ = = = = = ~ ~ = = = = == = = = = ~ == = = = = ======== = = == ===== = ==== = = == == = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = Amount Date Vendor 163659 -___uu_h- u_-_u_u ------_u_-_uuuu 12/12/2001 005697 WORK-SPORTS & OUTDOORS 163660 163661 163662 163663 163664 163665 163666 163667 12/12/2001 005704 CASCADE ELEVATOR COMPANY 12/12/2001 005736 HANSON, SETH 12/12/2001 005798 CERTIFIED LAND SERVICES 12/12/2001 005842 DPK INC 12/12/2001 005893 J & K PLUMBING INC 12/12/2001 005920 URS CORPORATION 12/12/2001 005922 QWEST DEX Invoice PO 0310 045585 333 043887 328 043030 273 043030 PS-REIMB 045541 103 043609 AGOl-63 #6 043967 102901-4 045472 03869 044421 661-3748-00 12/12/2001 005949 S 0 TECH/SPECIAL OPERATÍONS 624 -_u - - - - - - --- - - ---- - - - -- u - u_u- - _u- uu- ---- _u- 045581 Descript ion/Account PKM-RAIN GEAR/S OSBORN 001-7100-331- 576 -10-33 0 u uuu_u_uuu_u_u--u_u_- --uU_---u_u 86.70 Total, PKCHB-ELEVATOR SERVICES 505-1100- 331- 518-3 0 -48 0 PKRCS-ELEVATOR MAINT SVC 505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 571-10 -48 0 PKRCS-ELEVATOR MAINT SVC 505 -11 0 0 - 3 31- 571-10 -4 8 0 Total, PS-REIMB, PER DIEM EXPENSE 001-2100-111- 521- 22 - 431 Total, PWSCIP-REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION 306 -44 00-126 - 595 - 3 0-411 Total, PWS-23RD AVE SO ROADWAY IMPROVE 306 -44 00-109- 595-30- 650 Total, PKDBC-REPAIR KITCHEN SINK 402 - 72 00 -101- 575-45 -480 Total, SWM-ESA/NPDES GAP ANALYSIS 001- 52 00- 079- 558 - 6 0-411 401-3100- 649- 542-48-410 Total, PKDBC- DIRECTORY AD 402 - 7200-1 01- 575-4 5 -44 0 Total, PS-BELT HANGER ADAPTER 001- 21 0 0 -111- 521- 2 2 - 312 - uu ---_u- - - - - u- - -- uu - - _u_--- ---- 86.70 141.44 141.44 141.44 424.32 136.00 136.00 3,825.41 3,825.41 363,086.57 363,086.57 195.97 195.97 632.83 12,389.39 13,022.22 107.40 107.40 87.50 Page, 28 P vchlst 12:/12/2001 15:58:38 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 29 Voucher = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = === == === = === = = === ==== = === ==== = = = ==== == = == == == ===== = = ====== ===== == = == = = = = = = = = ===== = = = = = == == == == == = = = = = == == = == = Date Vendor Invoice Descript ion/Account Amount PO u_-_uu_-- _uu--u- uuu_--_uuu_--_u_u_-_uu_- u-_u__uu ___un_un u_--_u_--uuu__uu-------- -_u_u_u_uu 163668 163669 163670 163671 163672 163673 163674 163675 163676 Total: 87.50 12/12/2001 006015 TEAM CONCEPTS 2487 045499 PS - DENIM OXFORD SHIRTS 001- 2100- 093 - 521-21- 33 0 304.64 Total: 304.64 12/12/2001 006028 FREEBORN LAW OFFICES PS 110601FREE MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{DATE} 11062001 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 5 0 -41 0 225.00 Total: 225.00 12/12/2001 006055 COMMERCIAL FENCE CORPORATIO 2000231 045535 SWMM-INSTALL FENCE 304 -3100-111- 596-42 - 319 3,568.64 3,568.64 Total: 12/12/2001 006056 CUFLEY, CHRISTY GERHART PRO TEM MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{DATE} 001-11 00- 022 - 512- 50-41 0 109.38 Total: 109.38 12/12/2001 700688 BUSCH, PATRICIA REF #90702 PKDBC-REFUND CLASS CXLD 001- 0000- 000-213-10- 001 60.00 Total: 60.00 12/12/2001 702061 WINTERS, DARRELL 12204 045584 PKDBC/BONSAI GARDEN 001-7200- 352 - 573-23 - 312 38.06 Total: 38.06 12/12/2001 703054 RUTEL, MARK 01-210-259 MSRM-CLAIM 01-01-210-259 501-1100- 043 - 514 - 91-4 95 3,136.31 Total: 3,136.31 12/12/2001 703055 NORA, BOWMAN 10/19/2001 101801BOWMAN PKDBC-REFUND H2O COLOR CLASS CX 402- 0000- 000-213 -1 0- 001 PKDBC-REFUND WATERCOLOR CLASS C 402- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001 51.00 51.00 Total: 102.00 12/12/2001 703056 CHENEY, BERTHA 101201CHENEY PKDBC-REFUND CLASS CANCELLED 402- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001 35.00 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - ---- - -- _u --_u_u -_u_-- - - -_u --_u- u- - - u_- u_-- u - --- - - --- - u_-- u uuu - ----_u- u- Page: 29 P vchlst 12/12/200115'58'39 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 30 Voucher """"""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = ~ = = ~ = ~ ~ = = = ~ = Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount PO n_--nnn- -- n_--n- Uun__n_- nn n_n__nn- n_u--_n n___u_n 163677 163678 163679 163680 163681 163682 163683 163684 163685 163686 Total, 35.00 12/12/2001 703057 HALL, SHIRLEY 101201HALL PKDBC- REFUND SWIM PROGRAM 402 - 0000- 00 0-213 -10 - 001 25.00 Total, 25.00 12/12/2001 703058 BIZAK, KATHY 101901BIZAK PKDBC-REFUND CANCELLED RECEPTIO 402- 0000- 000 -213 -1 0- 001 455.00 Total, 455.00 12/12/2001 703059 NEHF, JOHN 01-41729 MSF-REFUND APPLICATION PAYMENT 001- 0000- 090-369- 90- 010 20.00 Total, 20.00 12/12/2001 703060 SEK, KIM 03-0036652 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL 001- 0000- 090-367-10- 073 50.00 Total, 50.00 12/12/2001 703061 ST. VINCENT DE PAUL, JOSEPH 101201CORNER PW-REFUND ADMN DEPOSIT 101- 0000- 000-23 9-10- 002 3,883.00 Total, 3,883.00 12/12/2001 703062 KHAN,MAIMUNA 03-0036591 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL 001- 0000- 090 -367-10- 073 50.00 Total, 50.00 12/12/2001 703063 HATHAWAY, PRUDENCE 03-0035884 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL 001- 0000- 090 - 367 -1 0- 073 50.00 Total, 50.00 12/12/2001 703064 PEEKAY INC." DBA LOVER'S P 01-0041168 MSF-REFUND LICENSE FEE 001- 0000- 000-321- 70- 000 50.00 Total, 50.00 12/12/2001 703065 GORHAM, PAM 01-0041444 MSF-REFUND LICENSE FEE 001- 0000- 000-321- 70- 000 50.00 Total, 50.00 12/12/2001 703066 ENDSLEY, PAUL 03-0036586 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL u_- - nun - n - - - _n- - - n n --- nn - - _n- - - - -- - - - u -- - -- - - --- - - -- - n n_- - n- - _~___n _n - __n nun n____n Page, 30 p vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58 :40 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 31 Voucher == = == = = == = = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = ===== = = = === ==== == = = === = = = == === = == === = = == === = = === = = = = == = = = = = = == = = = = = == = = === = = = == == = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = Date Vendor Invoice De scri pt ion/ Accoun t Amount PO ----_u----- _u_--uu u--u----------uuu_u--------- u----_u--- --_uu----- -----_u-----u---------------- --------------- 163687 163688 163689 163690 163691 163692 163693 163694 163695 001- 0000- 090-367-10- 073 50.00 12/12/2001 703067 THE GOOD GUYS REFUND Total, 50.00 PWS-REFUND ROW PERMIT 101- 0000- 000- 23 9 -10- 002 2,929.00 Total, 2,929.00 CDB-REFUND MECH CK FEE 001- 0000- 074 - 345-83 - 001 62.87 Total, 62.87 CDB-REFUND ELEC FIXTURES 001- 0000- 074- 322-10- 007 49.25 Total, 49.25 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DPST 402 - 0000- 00 0-213 -10- 001 99.00 Total, 99.00 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DPST 402 - 0000- 0 00-213 -10- 001 150.00 PKDBC- REFUND RENTAL DPST 402 - 0000- 00 0-213-10- 001 135.48 Total, 285.48 CDB-REFUND ADMIN DEPOSIT 001- 0000- 00 0 -239-10- 000 500.00 Total, 500.00 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DPST 402 - 0000- 00 0-213 -10- 001 127.32 Total, 127.32 PKDBC- REFUND RENTAL DPST 402 - 0000 - 00 0 -213 -1 0 - 001 125.00 Total, 125.00 PKRCS-REFUND 001- 0000- 000 -213 -1 0- 001 15.00 PKRCS-REFUND TRIP FEE 12/12/2001 703068 UNITED SYSTEMS, INC. 1031UNITEDSY 12/12/2001 703069 INTERCEPT CONTROL SYSTEM, I 0110310700 12/12/2001 703070 WOODMONT ELEM SCHOOL, BUSHA 110901WOODMR 12/12/2001 703071 STOLTENBERG, BRUCE 102701STOLTE 102701BRUCE 12/12/2001 703072 QUADRANT CORP, ATTN, JEFF R REF. DEPOSIT 12/12/2001 703073 SEA INST. FOR BIOMEDICAL, C 101701HYDE 12/12/2001 703074 SALTWATER UNITARIAN CHURCH, 110401SALTWA 12/12/2001 703076 BERGLUND, COLLEEN REF 90701 REF#90419 ---------- ------- - -- --- -- - - - ---- - - u- - -- - - - - --- - -- ----- - - -- -- --- - - -- ---- -- - --- -- - -- - - - - --- - - ---- --- ---u-- - ---- Page, 31 P vchlst 12/12/200115,58,41 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 32 Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Descript ion/Account === = = == = = == = = == = = ==== = = = = === == == == = = = = ==== = == === = = = == ======= = == == == = = = = = === = === = = == = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === Amount PO ---_u_--_u _u_----U u_--u--_uu_---u--_u_---_u-- U 001- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001 u_--u__u- _u_uu_u_-_uu_u_-_u_---- uu_uuuuu 16.00 163695 12/12/2001 (Continued) 163696 12/12/2001 703077 SHELTON, STEVE REF#90416 PKRCS-CLASS CANCELED 001- 0000- 000-213 -10- 001 163697 12/12/2001 703078 SMITH, DOUG REF#90417 PKRCS-REFUD FOR OVERPAYMENT 001- 0000- 000- 213 -10- 001 163698 12/12/2001 703079 TEAL, AZHMALIYYIH REF#90418 PKRCS-REFUND CLASS REG. 001- 0000- 000-213-10- 001 163699 12/12/2001 703080 IDEAL SERVICES, ATTN, JUDY REF01-104417 CDPL-REFUND 01-104417-00 001-0000- 074 - 322-10- 007 163700 12/12/2001 703081 BROWN, MARGARET ANN 4901648 MC-JUROR FEE, 11/19-21 001-11 00- 022- 512 - 50-4 91 163701 12/12/2001 703082 DE LOS ANGELES, EDWIN 4903287 MC-JUROR FEE, 11/19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91 163702 12/12/2001 703083 ELLERS ON, JERRY 4903837 MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21 001-1100 - 022 - 512 -50-4 91 163703 12/12/2001 703084 FISH, JAMES D 4904203 MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512-50-4 91 163704 12/12/2001 703085 GROW, LOUISSA PEARL 4905112 MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21 001-11 00- 022- 512 - 50-4 91 -- - - - u - - - - u --- - - --- - - - -- - - - - - - --- - u _u -- -- - - u -_u- u_u- - - u_- u u_u - --_u - - - -_u- - -_u u -- -- u - ---- uu Total: 31.00 5.00 Total: 5.00 25.00 Total: 25.00 33.00 Total, 33.00 52.80 Total, 52.80 25.52 Total: 25.52 24.14 Total: 24.14 33.80 Total: 33.80 24.14 Total, 24.14 16.90 Total: 16.90 Page: 32 P vchlst 12(12(2001 15,58,42 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 33 Voucher == = = = = = === = = = = = == = = = = = == === = = = = = = = === === ====== === == = = = == = == = = === == = === == = = = = == === = = = = = = = = ==== = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = Amount Date Vendor Invoice Descript ion (Account 163705 ------------ ---------- ---------------------------------- u---------- ------------ ------------------------------- --------------- 26.90 163706 163707 163708 163709 163710 163711 163712 163713 163714 PO 12(12(2001 703086 HARDWICKE, ANN GILMARTIN MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 4905440 12(12(2001 703087 LOCKWOOD, MARSHA J 4908223 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512-50 -4 91 12(12(2001 703088 MANSELL, GENA HELENE 4908579 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 12(12(2001 703089 MURPHY, PATTY B 4909791 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91 12(12(2001 703090 REMPEL, ELDEAN B 4911924 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512- 50-4 91 12(12(2001 703091 SAMEK, RICHARD A 4912659 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91 12(12(2001 703092 SMITH, BRENT P 4913620 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 12(12(2001 703093 WILLIAMS, NATHANAEL 4916383 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91 12(12(2001 703094 ZICKLER, DAWN 4917040 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-1100- 022- 512 - 50-491 12(12(2001 703095 STROBEL, MILBERT 5900 MC-JUROR FEE, 11(19-21 001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91 Total, 26.90 22.76 Total, 22.76 26.90 Total, 26.90 22.76 Total, 22.76 26.90 Total, 26.90 31. 04 Total, 31.04 26.90 Total, 26.90 25.52 Total, 25.52 28.28 Total, 28.28 16.90 -- - - - -- -- - - - --- - - - ---- - ---- --- --- -- --- --- --------------------- Page, 33 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 34 P vchlst 12/12/200115:58:42 Voucher ~~ = = ~ = = =~ = = = = = = = ~ = = = == = =~==== = = === = == = = == = =~ = ~~~ ~ == == == = = == ~=~~ = = == = ======~= = = = = = = = = ==~~~ = == = == = = = ==== =~~ ==~ = == ~ = = ~==== = = = == = = = = ==== Date Vendor Invoice Description/Account Amount PO u---------- ---------- ---------------------------------- --- ------ ------ - -- ---- -- - ----- - - -- -- - ---- ----- 163715 163716 163717 163718 163719 163720 163721 163722 163723 163724 12/12/2001 703096 VAN STRALEN, JUDY Total: 16.90 MC-JUROR FEE: 11/19-21 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-491 12.07 Total: 12.07 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOOL 001- 0000- 090- 36 7 -1 0- 073 50.00 Total: 50.00 PW-REFUND OVERPYMT FROM INV#323 101- 0000- 000-322 -4 0- 000 184.00 Total: 184.00 MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512- 50-491 50.70 Total: 50.70 MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25 001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 34.14 Total: 34.14 MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-491 22.76 Total: 22.76 MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 25.52 Total: 25.52 MC-JUROR FEE: 910/22-25 001-1100 - 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91 25.52 Total: 25.52 MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25 001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 36.21 Total: 36.21 MC-JUROR FEE: 10/22-25 5901 12/12/2001 703097 BERG, RAMONA REF TRAFFIC 12/12/2001 703098 PUGET SOUND ENERGY, ACCOUNT REF INV3233 12/12/2001 703099 ALBERS, SUZANNE F 4900186 12/12/2001 703100 BAKER, LINDA 4900674 12/12/2001 703101 BAKER, PATRICIA C 4900677 12/12/2001 703102 BLAHA, KATHRYN M 4901186 12/12/2001 703103 BLAU, WILLIAM F 4901220 12/12/2001 703104 BLUBAUGH, MARK 4901241 12/12/2001 703105 DAWSON, LINDA C 4903191 - - -------- - ---- -- ---- -- ---- -- - - ----- -------- ------ ---- - --- - - - --- - -- - -- - --- - -- - - - -- - - ------ - - ---- --- ---- ------- ------ Page: 34 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,42 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 35 == = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = == = = = = == = = = == = = = = = = === = === = == = = ==== ==== = = == === = = = = = = = == = = == = = = = = = = = = = == == == = = = == = = === = ==== = ===== === Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account Amount u_u__u_u _uu-_U- un___-UU_UU_-_UUUUU-_U uu__u_u- _u_uu_--- uunUUUUU-_UUU- _UUUUU_U- 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 22.76 Total, 22.76 163725 12/12/2001 703106 DURFLINGER, JEAN C 4903680 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-11 00- 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 24.14 Total, 24.14 163726 12/12/2001 703107 FIERKE, MARY I 4904152 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022- 512 - 50-4 91 24.14 Total, 24.14 163727 12/12/2001 703108 HARDT, CLARENCE NEAL 4905438 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100 - 022- 512 - 50-4 91 24.14 Total, 24.14 163728 12/12/2001 703109 KIM, SANG DO 4907256 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-11 0 0 - 022 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 34.14 Total, 34.14 163729 12/12/2001 703110 LEWIS, CATHLEEN C 4908073 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 22.76 Total, 22.76 163730 12/12/2001 703111 MARSHALL, GEORGE PAUL 4908641 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022- 512 -50-4 91 25.52 Total, 25.52 163731 12/12/2001 703112 PETTIS, GARRY WARREN 4911208 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91 24.14 Total, 24.14 163732 12/12/2001 703113 PIGGOTT, REED MADSEN 4911324 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-11 00- 022 - 512- 50 -4 91 12.76 Total, 12.76 163733 12/12/2001 703114 POORE, RICHARD C 4911423 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022- 512 - 50-491 26.90 Total, 26.90 - -- U - - - - - - - -_U - u_u - - - - u-- - - - U- -- - uu - _u - - __un - -_u U - - - - u_u - - - U- - u_u - - - _u- - - -_u - - - - - - - - - - - U - U - - - - - - - n_- - - - - U - U Page, 35 P vchlst 12/12/200115,58,43 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 36 Voucher == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = === = = = = === = = = == = === ==== = = ===== = == = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == Amount Date Vendor Invoice Descript ion/Account 163734 --uu---u- nU--UU uu_uu_n-__UUUUU_UU---- --_uu--_u --_u_--_u- uuu_u--_uuu_uun--u_- uUu__uuu- 38.28 163735 163736 163737 163738 163739 163740 163741 163742 163743 12/12/2001 703115 QUINE-TAYLOR, JANIS L 12/12/2001 703116 SAGE, LEE 12/12/2001 703117 SHUCK, LEANNE NORENE 12/12/2001 703118 SrLLAS, MATTHEW JOHN 12/12/2001 703119 SPROUL, RANDALL LEE 12/12/2001 703120 TAVARES, VICKI L 12/12/2001 703121 URABECK, DIXIE A 12/12/2001 703122 VAUGHAN, RAYMOND C 12/12/2001 703123 VINE, ESTHER G 12/12/2001 703124 WILSON, ROBERT A PO 4911651 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100 - 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 Total, Total, Total, Total, Total, Total, Total, Total, Total, --- u - - - - - - u - _u - - -- - - - - u - -- - - u u - - - - _u - - uu- - - _uu -- h- -- u__u u__u- - u _u - - - - - h-U - - - -- _u- u__u u uu - - u- -- 4912613 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-11 0 0 - 02 2 - 512 - 5 0 -4 91 4913361 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 4913401 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91 4914022 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 4914673 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 5 0-4 91 4915336 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 4915502 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100 - 022- 512 - 50 -4 91 4915594 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 4916479 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-11 00- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 38.28 24.14 24.14 24.14 24.14 24.14 24.14 24.14 24.14 24.14 24.14 22.76 22.76 21. 38 21. 38 24.14 24.14 24.14 Page, 36 P vchlst 12/12/2001 15,58,43 Print Voucher List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 37 000000000000000 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 0 =0 = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = == = = === = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = === Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Descript ion/Account Amount --_un--U- n__-U_U uuuu_uU u--uuu- -- _uuu_---- u_un__uu__n_nuu_uuu uu--uu----- Total, 24.14 163744 12/12/2001 703125 WOO, BRENDA KERN 4916609 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50-4 91 24.14 Total, 24.14 163745 12/12/2001 703126 ZITZER, JUNE G 4917064 MC-JUROR FEE, 10/22-25 001-1100- 022 - 512 - 50 -4 91 36.21 Total, 36.21 163746 12/12/2001 703127 REILLY, KIM 10192001REIL PKDBC-REFUND WATERCOLOR CLASS C 402 - 0000- 00 0 -213 -10 - 0 01 34.50 Total, 34.50 Total Vouchers, 768,647.77 244 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Way, Washington, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claims. Signature Date --- - - - - -- - - -- n- - - _u - - u_u - - - - - --- - _u u_u- - ---_u - - nUU u -- - u nU- - u _nu- - -_u- - nU - u_-_u uu- -- Page, 37 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10,08,33 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 1 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -------- -------- _u_--_u--------------------------- ---------- ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 163309 11/20/01 001004 MAILMEDIA INC J#36000 11/14/01 On-Line Reg. Letter Po 1,481.29 1,481.29 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163310 11/30/01 000002 SOUND VIEW AUTO BODY INC 1996 11/02/01 MSFLT-VEH BODY/PAINT 883.34 883.34 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163311 11/30/01 000033 FIRESAFE/FIRE & SAFETY 031750 10/16/01 MSFLT-FIRE EXTINGUISHE 179.03 179.03 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163312 11/30/01 000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPA 131823 10/18/01 PKDBC-REPAIR/MAINT SUP 11.94 Voucher, Bank Code, key 131643 10/17/01 PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES -12.02 131394 10/10/01 PKDBC-TARPS 11.95 132717 11/13/01 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT BUrp 23.67 131831 10/22/01 PWS-MAINT TOOL/SUPPLIE 5.29 131711 10/18/01 PKDBC-BONSAI/MAINT SUP 2.52 131628 10/17/01 PKDBC-BONSAI/MAINT SUP 7.42 50.77 163313 11/30/01 000044 OGDEN, MURPHY, WALLACE, PLL 609104 07/31/01 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES 25.00 25.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163314 11/30/01 000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP 541215 10/17/01 LAW-PSE ADV. CITIES 2,525.15 Voucher, Bank Code, key 534160 07/23/01 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES (A/E 1,625.00 53416 OA 07/23/01 LAW-LEGAL SERVICES (SIG 24,085.48 28,235.63 163315 11/30/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 0.00 HVOIDH Voucher, Bank Code, key 163316 11/30/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 753-129-10 10/22/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 101.98 Voucher, Bank Code, key 252-150-20 10/25/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 96.68 183-469-10 10/17/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 136.64 472-100-10 10/17/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 69.87 699-699-10 10/18/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 5.47 311-112-70 10/22/01 PKDBC/KFT-NATL GAS 1,156.28 727-469-10 10/22/01 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRICITY 1,810.59 117-437-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 105.38 373-087-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 136.60 917-259-10 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 74.44 458-148-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 276.75 141-467-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 222.33 504-368-10 11/05/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 46.22 657-289-00 11/01/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 6.09 720-429-10 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 122.03 755-430-20 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 94.03 250-275-03 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 189.19 733-829-10 11/02/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 47.49 131-066-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 10,660.33 342-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 93.97 352-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 25.80 -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- Page, 1 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10,08,33 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 2 = = = = ~ = ~ = ~ ~ = = = = ~ ~ = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = ~ ~ = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~ Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total _n_n --__un n_-------_--___n----nn----__--_- -______n- nn_n_nnn--___--- _--n_nn____- nnn__--_nn_n 163316 11/30/01 000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC (continued) 442-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 25.80 536-673-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 232.20 738-448-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 58.64 638-448-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 78.19 128-255-39 10/18/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 419.92 904-388-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 124.81 996-289-00 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 111.63 062-691-10 10/31/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 13.57 736-169-10 10/30/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 138.70 190-977-00 10/29/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 153.97 153-835-10 11/06/01 PS-STREET LIGHTING 13.52 544-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 88.39 534-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 324.61 744-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 132.39 934-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 98.55 654-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 404.35 644-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 128.28 444-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 1,174.96 168-847-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 190.44 454-132-10 11/07/01 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 18.77 398-842-10 11/07/01 PKRLS-ELECTRICITY/GAS 1,190.59 895-405-10 10/18/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 132.51 519-842-10 11/07/01 PKCHB-ELECTRICITY CHGS 2,726.41 439-922-10 11/07/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 2,777.63 980-132-10 11/14/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 1,722.51 918-041-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 438.46 345-200-20 11/07/01 PKCP-ELECTRICITY CHGS 3,042.97 002-141-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 42.11 109-922-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 849.43 102-141-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.47 722-288-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 168.68 711-141-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 5.47 319-041-10 11/06/01 PKM-ELECTRICITY CHARGE 83.18 993-440-20 10/25/01 PWT-STREET LIGHTING 176.70 32,771 . 97 163317 11/30/01 000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE 34113370/1 10/16/01 CDB-OFFICE SUPPLIES 953.16 953.16 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163318 11/30/01 000065 U S POSTMASTER POBOX RENE 11/29/01 MSMD-ANNUAL FEE, PO BOX 750.00 750.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163319 11/30/01 000075 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES I 017-204057 11/02/01 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 1,203.21 1,203.21 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163320 11/30/01 000097 EDEN SYSTEMS INC MSF-TRAINI 11/14/01 MSF-YR END TRAINING-ED 500.00 500.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n - - - n n - - - - - - - - - n - - - - n - - - - - - - - - - n - - - - - - - - - n - n - - - - - - - -- Page, 2 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10,08,33 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 3 Check Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total Date 163321 11/30/01 000109 Voucher, 163322 11/30/01 000125 Voucher, 163323 11/30/01 000142 Voucher' 163324 11/30/01 000166 Voucher' 163325 11/30/01 000173 Voucher, 163326 11/30/01 000201 Voucher, 163327 11/30/01 000202 Voucher, 163328 11/30/01 000217 Voucher, 163329 11/30/01 000228 Voucher, 163330 11/30/01 000253 Voucher' 163331 11/30/01 000328 Voucher, 163332 11/30/01 000340 Voucher' 163333 11/30/01 000343 Voucher, Invoice _nnnn_n nnnnn ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DB 12709 Bank Code, key 12703 12702 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISIO 1079211 Bank Code, key 1083945 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE Bank Code, key TRA CK# 1828 CK# 1829 CK# 1827 CK#1831 CK# 1830 CK# 1812 CK #1809 CK# 1823 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION 183892 Bank Code, key Inv. Date Description Amount Paid _n_n____n__nnn_- n_n_n_n__n 11/08/01 PWS-PADLOCK 11/06/01 PKDBC-LOCKSMITH SERVIC 11/05/01 PKRLS-LOCKSMITH SERVIC 10/16/01 PWT-KC SIGNS/SIGNAL MA 10/19/01 PS-KING CO JAIL{SEPT} 11/21/01 11/21/01 11/16/01 11/29/01 11/29/01 11/08/01 11/02/01 11/07/01 PWS-TRAVEL TWESSEL 11/ PWS-TRAVEL J . MULKEY 11 PS-TRAVEL,D.GABRELUK 1 PS-J.LINDSAY,LV PRACTI MSF-J . TEELER MEALS PS-J. LANDON TRAVEL EXP MSF-S. GORDON, MEALS/LO PS-A. KIRKPATRICK MEALS 10/24/01 PWT-MEMBERSHIP DUES WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 3101345667 12/01/00 LAW-2001 COURT RULES Bank Code, key KINKO'S INC Bank Code, key 5151000593 10/08/01 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS QWEST Bank Code, key Z04-0609-4 11/04/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 630-152926 10/29/01 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 5- 984- 5515 10/12/01 MSFLT-POSTAGE/TRANSPOR Bank Code, key MULTI-SERVICE CENTER Bank Code, key AG 01-47 10/17/01 CDBG-CARES CHILD CARE S WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEP RE313ATB11 10/09/01 PWS-WSDOT MAINTENANCE Bank Code, key RE313ATB11 11/09/01 PWCIP-GENERAL PROJ MGM ATB1110918 11/09/01 PWCIP-GEN PROJECT MGMT ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) Bank Code, key 0088201 0090403 0088202 0089300 10/15/01 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE 11/15/01 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLE 10/15/01 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 10/31/01 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVIC 2001100214 10/22/01 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE Bank Code, key ELEPHANT CAR WASH Bank Code, key 9/30 STMT -- --- - ------ --- -------- - ------ ----- - ------ - ----- --- _n- 09/30/01 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE 31.78 170.47 27.42 229.67 31,143.87 79,937.32 111,081.19 120.00 120.00 122.00 190.00 53.65 777.72 137.13 791.12 2,311.62 273.00 273.00 254 .14 254.14 595.41 595.41 11,334.33 20.97 11,355.30 35.10 35.10 10,248.51 10,248.51 14,141.51 968.41 152.12 15,262.04 1,876.68 1,327.21 3,782.18 3,795.94 10,782.01 1,032.51 1,032.51 154.98 154.98 Page, 3 0 chklst 11/30/200110,08'33 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 4 Check Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total Date nnn_nn 163334 11/30/01 000351 Voucher' 163335 11/30/01 000376 Voucher' 163336 11/30/01 000414 HVOIDH Vouchee 163337 11/30/01 000414 Voucher, 163338 11/30/01 000432 Voucher, 163339 11/30/01 000438 Voucher, --- - nn nn- - _nn - -- Invoice nn_nnn_n _n_nnn SEATTLE TIMES-SUBSCRIPTIONS 30446434 Bank Code, key Inv. Date Description 11/06/01 CM-SEATTLE P-I SUBSCRI KING COUNTY WATER & LAND DI SWM 2001-2 10/22/01 SWM-UTLY BLNGS/COLLECT Bank Code, key CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC Bank Code, key CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC Bank Code, key TAYLOR RENTAL Bank Code, key 5288 5250 5249 5248 5246 5245 5244 5241 5239 5238 5237 5228 5272 5254 5270 5273 5271 5275 5287 5280 5281 5295 5247 5242 5240 5274 5269 5285 5252 5243 5279 5296 5306 5299 030275 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONE 1914 Bank Code, key 10/31/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 10/15/01 10/25/01 10/23/01 10/25/01 10/25/01 10/25/01 10/25/01 10/31/01 10/25/01 10/25/01 10/31/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 10/25/01 10/25/01 10/29/01 11/01/01 11/01/01 10/25/01 11/05/01 10/31/01 11/08/01 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS PKDBC-CATERING,11/19-2 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS 11 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS,11 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS,11 PKDBC-CATERING SVCS; 11 PKDBC-WA SENATE 11/11- PKDBC-SALTWATER UNITAR PKDBC-LIGHT OF CHRIST PKDBC-PAC.NW LIBRARY A PKDBC-MILGARD 11/1-02 PKDBC-DEPT. TRADE/ECONO PKDBC-AVANTA 10/12-14 PKDBC-SEA PUBLIC LIBRA PKDBC-FW ARTS COMMISIO PKDBC- UP PRESBYTERIAN, PKDBC-HANSEL& GRETEL 1 PKDBC- PIONEER ELEMENTA PKDBC-VA PUGET SD 10/1 PKDBC- WEYERHAEUSER - BEP PKDBC-WORLD-VISION 10/ PKDBC-B.STOLTENBERG JD PKDBC-FUSION 11/16-17 PKDBC-CATERING CONTEXT PKDBC-CREATEIVE MEMORI PKDBC-ELCA REGION 1 AD PKDBC-BUNZEL 10/18/01 PKDBC-VA PUGET SOUND A PKDBC-LEADERSHIP INSTI PKDBC-CATERING SVCS PKDBC-WORLD VISION MKT PS-ASST BOXED LUNCHES PKDBC-CATERING SVCS PRCS-FOOD/BEV ARTS 10/23/01 PRCS-HELIUM TANK 11/09/01 CM-AGENDA SET. LUNCH Amount Paid --__nnnn-n n_n-n_nn_--n 37.70 37.70 13,535.41 13,535.41 0.00 171.06 544 .80 721.68 136.00 856.80 268.20 1,189.80 861.00 1,028.50 551.98 343.32 638.45 66.40 37.06 86.10 146.30 40.80 217.60 126.00 524 .88 403.00 59.22 341.60 2,142.42 505.80 312.20 214.35 17.60 4,243.52 3,152.88 626.40 304.96 134.10 306.04 21,320.82 53.86 53.86 34.10 34.10 nnn n__nn - ----- n_--- -- Page, 4 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10:08:34 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 000000 000000 0 ~ ~ ~ 0000000000 = = = = = ~ ~ = = = = = ~ = = = = = 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 = 0 = ~ = = = 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 = = = = = = = 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ = = 0 0 = ~ ~ = = = 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 = Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount Paid Check Total _uu_u - -- - - -- u u u u u u u u u u - - n n u - u u u u u uu---- n--uuuuuun--u uunnuuu- nuu____uu-u- 163340 11/30/01 000475 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS 199085 10/20/01 MC-ALARM MONITORING SV 100.00 100.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 163341 11/30/01 000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 087546 10/16/01 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 27.38 Voucher: Bank Code: key 087713 10/22/01 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT STIHL 16 .35 43.73 163342 11/30/01 000515 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT MSINET-APC 07/12/01 MSINET :APC CONNECTORS 195.84 195.84 Voucher: Bank Code: key 163343 11/30/01 000567 WA STATE-ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT MS02109001 10/31/01 PWD-WWHM TRAIN A.DOWER 150.00 150.00 Voucher: Bank Code: key 163344 11/30/01 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB 0.00 HVOID** Voucher: Bank Code: key 163345 11/30/01 000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DB 1014274 10/16/01 PS-CK BRAKES /R&R PADS 52.13 Voucher: Bank Code: key 1014309 10/17/01 FLEET REPAIRS/MAINTENA 54.38 1013890 09/28/01 PS-WIPERARM ASSEMB#901 84.33 1014261 10/15/01 PS-R&RLF DR PANEL-INST 250.90 1014037 10/05/01 PS-LOF #639 25.01 1014168 10/10/01 PS-CHARGING SYSTM #600 69.09 1014000 10/03/01 PS-TIRES REPAIR #903 13 .32 1013984 10/02/01 PS-INSTALL BULBS#632 50.94 1013983 10/02/01 PS-BRAKES/PADS/CALIPER 213 .40 1013989 10/02/01 PS-DIAGNOSTIC #626 38.84 1013994 10/03/01 PS-LOF/TIRES#636 244.19 1013 936 10/01/01 PS-FAN RELAY #503 104.83 1014094 10/08/01 PS-WIPER BLADES #507 24.39 1014127 10/09/01 PS-TIRES 215/70R #903 50.62 1014260 10/15/01 PS-#623 MIRROR ASSY/DR 218.25 1014356 10/20/01 PS-TIRES#903 215/70R15 49.20 1014351 10/19/01 PS-TIRES#638 225/60RER 73.00 1014373 10/20/01 PS-#615/ANTIFREZE/CLAM 125.34 1014479 10/25/01 PS-PARTS CLEANER #903 90.97 1014468 10/25/01 PS-LOF #516 M:55893 21.76 1014472 10/25/01 PS-LOF #583 27.45 1014294 10/17/01 PS-LOF#625 25.01 1014198 10/12/01 PS-LOF#521 25.01 1,932.36 163346 11/30/01 000581 TOOL TOWN INC 33488 10/10/01 PKM-AIR IMPACTOR/CABLE 195.79 195.79 Voucher: Bank Code: key 163347 11/30/01 000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 007-307-50 11/02/01 PKM-WATER/IRRIGATION @ 327.48 327.48 Voucher: Bank Code: key 163348 11/30/01 000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY INC 5 11/01/01 PWS-2001 ASPHALT OVERL 45,364.46 45,364.46 Voucher: Bank Code: key -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - --- - - - u - - - - - - - u - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - u - - - - - - - - - - - u - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Page: 5 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10:08:34 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: Check Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total Date Invoice ----n_--_--__---------------------- - 163349 11/30/01 000671 Voucher: 163350 11/30/01 000694 Voucher: 163351 11/30/01 000714 Voucher: 163352 11/30/01 000723 Voucher: 163353 11/30/01 000730 Voucher: 163354 11/30/01 000748 Voucher: 163355 11/30/01 000784 Voucher: 163356 11/30/01 000799 Voucher: 163357 11/30/01 000804 Voucher: 163358 11/30/01 000808 Voucher: 163359 11/30/01 000846 Voucher: 163360 11/30/01 000885 Voucher: 163361 11/30/01 000891 Voucher: 163362 11/30/01 000947 Voucher: 163363 11/30/01 000955 Voucher: 163364 11/30/01 000960 Voucher: ------------------ H D FOWLER COMPANY Bank Code: key 1061584 1061583 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMPANY 68683586 Bank Code: key SKY HAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY Bank Code: key AGOO-106A SOUND RESOURCE MGMT GROUP I FWP-O14 Bank Code: key ENTRANCO INC Bank Code: key HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Bank Code: key 31495 35910-11 011018 Inv. Date Description Amount Paid ---------------------- --------------- ------------------ 529.72 10/09/01 PKM-UNIV. SOLENOID/REPA 10/09/01 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 10/17/01 PKRLS-FIRST AID SUPPLI 09/18/01 PKRLS-SPORTS CAMP COOR 10/31/01 PWSWR-SLD WST RECY COL 01/17/01 PW-COSTCO GAS STATION/ 10/26/01 PWSCIP-23RD AVE S RD I 08/22/01 MSDP:HTML PROGRAMMING- PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN S1548967-0 08/02/01 MSTEL- 6408D DISPLAY P Bank Code: key JET CHEVROLET Bank Code: key CTCS49735 ROBERT H LEWIS & ASSOCIATES 1124-01 Bank Code: key PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Bank Code: key ICMA Bank Code: key PARKER PAINT MANUFACTURING Bank Code: key OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN Bank Code: key YOUR INC DBA Bank Code: key MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANY Bank Code: key 0647822 206941 22180309 10/19/01 MSFLT-#763 LOF M4342 11/02/01 COURT REPORTING/DEJA V 10/03/01 PKM-LIGHTING SUPPLIES 10/14/01 CM-2002 ICMA DUES :MOSE 11/15/01 PKM-FRENCH LAKE SIGN P 11/14 STMT 11/14/01 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 2699 AB111557S MATTHEW BENDER & COMPANY IN 17612063 Bank Code: key -- -- -- -- --- ---- 11/20/01 MC-JANITORIAL SVC NOV. 10/31/01 SWMM-SUPPLIES 10/26/01 LAW-WA APPL VOL 102 130.20 399.52 128.66 128.66 582.40 582.40 2,281.11 2,281.11 1,817.83 36,343.41 38,161.24 229.00 229.00 1,393.08 1,393.08 32.19 32.19 78.75 78.75 14.04 14.04 912.00 912.00 24.23 24.23 770.22 770.22 660.00 660.00 35.09 35.09 16.97 16.97 - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - n -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- --- Page: 6 0 chklst 11/30/200110,08'34 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 7 Check Vendor """" = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total Date 163365 11/30/01 000977 Voucher, 163366 11/30/01 001013 Voucher, 163367 11/30/01 001014 Voucher, 163368 11/30/01 001033 Voucher, 163369 11/30/01 001046 Voucher' 163370 11/30/01 001061 Voucher, 163371 11/30/01 001079 Voucher, 163372 11/30/01 001090 Voucher, 163373 11/30/01 001124 Voucher, 163374 11/30/01 001127 Voucher, 163375 11/30/01 001131 Voucher, 163376 11/30/01 001189 Voucher, 163377 11/30/01 001206 Voucher, 163378 11/30/01 001241 Voucher, 163379 11/30/01 001285 Voucher, uu - - - u - u u -- - u -- - --u u - uu - - uu MEASUREMENT RESEARCH CORP Bank Code, key DUFFLE BAG INC Bank Code, key Invoice 1031001B 039145 SKCSRA-SOCCER REFEREES ASSO AUG-OCT Bank Code, key WA STATE-DEPT OF LICENSING Bank Code, key EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION Bank Code, key Inv.Date Description Amount Paid 10/31/01 PWS-2001 MANUAL PAVEME -- ------------u- u_-uu_u-uu_- 3,500.00 11/14/01 PKM-WORK COAT/BLACKS HI 11/16/01 PKRLS-SOCCER OFFICIALS PWA-LIC RN 11/13/01 PWA-PROF LICENSE RENEW PWA LIC RN 11/20/01 PWA-LICENSE RENEWAL PWS LIC RE 11/20/01 PWS-LICENSE RENEWAL 4627277 10/25/01 PS-CREDIT INFORMATION WA STATE-AGRICULTURE DEPART PKM-LIC RN 11/16/01 PKM-PESTICIDE LIC RENE Bank Code, key PWS-LIC RN 11/19/01 PWS-PESTICIDE LICENSE PKM RECERT 11/20/01 PKM-PESTICIDE RECERTS SHRM-SOCIETY HUM RESOURCE M 2000977617 11/03/01 MSHR-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP Bank Code, key ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES IN JN21274 Bank Code, key VERIZON WIRELESS Bank Code, key COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS Bank Code, key 10/19/01 SWM-ASBESTOS SURVEY 1004-65261 11/05/01 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME AG 01-43 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC 001562 Bank Code, key 001564 001563 PETTY CASH Bank Code, key 12244 10/11/01 CDBG-DENTAL ACCESS PRO 10/13/01 MSFLT-LOF#302 M7072 10/13/01 MSFLT-LOF#301 M,11285 10/13/01 MSFLT-LOF#300 M,7242 11/27/01 LAW-PARKING, KIRKPATRIC WSSUA-WA STATE SOFTBALL UMP AG 00- 095A 10/10/01 PKRCS-SOFTBALL UMPIRE Bank Code, key WEST COAST AWARDS Bank Code, key ALPINE PRODUCTS INC Bank Code, key 37784/92 TM-46299 --uu--u_u- 10/16/01 PKRLS-PROGRAM SHIRTS 11/09/01 PKM-FIELD PAINT 3,500.00 200.70 200.70 4,760.00 4,760.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 300.00 21.76 21.76 25.00 25.00 150.00 200.00 160.00 160.00 1,280.00 1,280.00 431. 54 431.54 2,575.00 2,575.00 32.50 32.50 32.50 97.50 269.21 269.21 5,440.00 5,440.00 1,464.88 1,464.88 322.97 322.97 uuuuu_-- Page, 7 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10,08,34 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 8 Check Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total Date 163380 11/30/01 001427 Voucher, 163381 11/30/01 001430 Voucher, 163382 11/30/01 001431 Voucher, 163383 11/30/01 001481 Voucher, 163384 11/30/01 001593 Voucher, 163385 11/30/01 001601 Voucher, 163386 11/30/01 001604 Voucher, 163387 11/30/01 001618 Voucher, 163388 11/30/01 001630 Voucher, 163389 11/30/01 001748 Voucher, 163390 11/30/01 001805 Voucher' 163391 11/30/01 001856 Voucher, 163392 11/30/01 001879 Voucher, 163393 11/30/01 001902 Voucher, 163394 11/30/01 001990 Voucher' 163395 11/30/01 002010 Voucher, n_-_u_nn- WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT Bank Code, key WHITE CAP/BURKE Bank Code, key ICON MATERIALS INC Bank Code, key CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC Bank Code, key FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC Bank Code, key TAK INC Bank Code, key BALL, GIG I Y Bank Code, key SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW GLASS Bank Code, key BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC Bank Code, key EVERSON'S ECONO- VAC INC Bank Code, key VADIS NORTHWEST Bank Code, key Invoice _n- n_____--- Q1125988 J21982 761398 21126- 01 24025 N21126-1 3292371 3296764 3292708 10166 5593/5587 CA15597+ 1049429 Inv. Date Description Amount Paid n_nnn_n n_____n_n-n _nnn__nnn_n 850.72 11/09/01 PWS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL 10/17/01 MSFLT-HOSE/FLUID BACKH 10/24/01 SWMM-MISC SUPPLIES 11/05/01 PWS-01 ASPHALT OVERLAY 10/09/01 PWS-CLASS B ASPHALT 11/05/01 PWS-2001 ASPHALT OVERL 10/11/01 SWM-KITTS WETLANDS MON 11/12/01 PWSCIP-PACIFIC HWY SO 10/15/01 PWSCIP-PACIFIC HWY SO 08/29/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES 11/08/01 MSHR-2NO PG LETTERHEAD 10/23/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#1559 10/04/01 PS-WINDSHIELD REPR#700 OCT INVOIC 11/17/01 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 015906 00012173 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION 33804 Bank Code, key EARTH TECH INC Bank Code, key MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE Bank Code, key WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME MAT Bank Code, key KCM INC Bank Code, key 10/29/01 SWM-VACUUM/JET RODDING 10/31/01 PWSWR-LITTER CNTRL SVC 10/31/01 PWS-STREET SWEEPING SV 4373771890 11/01/01 PWST-S. 288TH ST (SR99 3498 113/0500 135240 nn__nn__nn- 11/01/01 PKM-LANDSCAPE MAINT SV 11/05/01 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL 11/09/01 PWSWM-MIRROR LAKE/FISH 763.56 87.16 79.09 79.09 1,857.03 760.84 19,182.36 21,800.23 2,458.13 26,843.30 22,983.78 52,285.21 112.06 112.06 425.21 425.21 87.50 87.50 213.25 213.25 1,035.84 1,035.84 1,833.73 1,833.73 4,020.00 4,020.00 8,213.20 8,213.20 7,239.50 7,239.50 2,066.26 2,066.26 81.10 81.10 1,341.74 1,341.74 ----- - ---- ------ -- ---- --- ---- ------- --- - -- ------ -- ---- Page, 8 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10,08,34 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~" ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~""""" = ~ ~""" ~ ~"""" ~ = = = = ~ = ~ =" Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv. Date Descript ion Amount Paid Check Total ~~uuu u_u~u ~ ~ - ~ u -~ n u u n - - u n n n n nn n u n u nn n un__U n~u~--~~~_nn~n_n n_nnnnnu ~-~uu~nuU-n- 163396 11/30/01 002204 WILBUR~ELLIS COMPANY 24-104768 11/07/01 PKM~CPL.PK.NOVEMBER FE 881.17 Voucher, Bank Code, key 24 -103571 09/25/01 PKM~FERTILIZER/INV#24~ 724.61 1,605.78 163397 11/30/01 002231 SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC 96621 10/31/01 CDPL-ENV REV,ST LUKE'S 450.40 Voucher, Bank Code, key 96634 10/31/01 CDPL~ENV REV,FANCHER 98.26 96630 10/31/01 CDPL~ENV REV,FW BUSINE 426.50 975.16 163398 11/30/01 002386 PAWLAK, SUSAN CA14849+ 10/30/01 MC~INTERPRETER, CA#1484 250.00 250.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163399 11/30/01 002521 SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 01F5824 10/29/01 SWMM~MISC. SUPPLIES 11 7.22 11 7.22 Voucher' Bank Code, key 163400 11/30/01 002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 1-304885 10/01/01 PKRLS~PEST CONTROL SVC 51.14 51.14 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163401 11/30/01 002557 PETTY CASH FUND~PARKS MAINT 12202 11/20/01 PKM~MILEAGE/D LEIDER 99.61 99.61 Voucher' Bank Code, key 163402 11/30/01 002566 QWEST TAC~366464 10/25/01 PKDBC~DIRECTORY AD 106.60 106.60 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163403 11/30/01 002574 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C. 174942 07 /23/01 LAW~LEGAL SVCS (SW356 34,208.70 Voucher, Bank Code, key 176156 08/22/01 LAW~LEGAL SERVICES (G) 325.58 34,534.28 163404 11/30/01 002717 WASHINGTON FIRM LTD, THE 110001 10/31/01 MSHR~TRAINING/SEXUAL H 2,000.00 2,000.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163405 11/30/01 002797 LOMBARDO, V MYRIAM CA#22100 11/06/01 MC~INTERPRETER,CA#2210 40.00 40.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163406 11/30/01 002899 ADOLF SON ASSOCIATES INC 019990320~ 10/31/01 CDPL~ENV REV;NOVASTAR 535.06 535.06 Voucher' Bank Code, key 163407 11/30/01 003048 PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DE 012191 11/20/01 PS-PARKING FEES~L. LED 238.90 238.90 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163408 11/30/01 003060 OHNO, JOHN CA#55270FW 10/19/01 MC~INTERPRETER, CA#5527 40.00 40.00 Voucher' Bank Code, key 163409 11/30/01 003138 NORMED 12378-3687 10/10/01 PS~GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL 338.59 Voucher, Bank Code, key 12378~3699 10/24/01 PS~RESPIRATOR N95 PYRA 156.90 12378~3693 10/17 /01 PS~GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL 103.91 599.40 163410 11/30/01 003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 29981 09/19/01 PKM~ALARM MONITORING S 164.18 Voucher, Bank Code, key 30323 10/28/01 PKM~ALARM MONITORING S 32.64 196.82 - u ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - - ~~ - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - - - - ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ u - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~- Page' 9 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10: 08: 34 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Check Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total Date Invoice Inv.Date Description - - - - - ---- - ------ -- ----- ----- - - - --- -- ---------- 163411 11/30/01 003193 Voucher: 163412 11/30/01 003209 Voucher: 163413 11/30/01 003399 Voucher: 163414 11/30/01 003440 Voucher: 163415 11/30/01 003466 Voucher: 163416 11/30/01 003520 Voucher: 163417 11/30/01 003560 Voucher: 163418 11/30/01 003563 Voucher: 163419 11/30/01 003565 Voucher: 16342011/30/01 003600 Voucher: 163421 11/30/01 003645 Voucher: 163422 11/30/01 003697 Voucher: 163423 11/30/01 003718 Voucher: 163424 11/30/01 003736 Voucher: 163425 11/30/01 003837 Voucher: 163426 11/30/01 003898 Voucher: -- - - -- ---- ----- - ---- - - ------- XP SOFTWARE INC Bank Code: key WASHINGTON POLYGRAPH Bank Code: key KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY Bank Code: key BILL HATCH SPORTS Bank Code: key 2963 01-006 CA#20604+ 69080-00 LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY IN 199374 Bank Code: key PHUNG, NOVA C Bank Code: key HUNTERS TREE SERVICE Bank Code: key ---------------------- -- 10/22/01 SWM-SOFTWARE UPGRADE 11/01/01 PS-PRE-EMP POLYGRAPHS 11/05/01 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2060 03/30/01 PKRCS- (6)SOCCER BALLS: 10/12/01 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIE CA#200933+ 11/09/01 MC-INTERPRETER: CA#2009 1067 1066 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTE 1029 Bank Code: key MONAK INC Bank Code: key SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES INC Bank Code: key 1806 11296 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE 1840 Bank Code: key SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS INC Bank Code: key 223256 JENKINS, HARDY & ASSOC, PLL 10292001 Bank Code: key NOV STMT NORTHWEST TOWING INC Bank Code: key UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Bank Code: key KING COUNTY RADIO Bank Code: key 6214 FW6324 10/29/01 PWS-TREE TRIMNG & RMVL 10/29/01 PWS-TREE REMOVAL 10/25/01 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 11/11/01 PS-UNIFORM DRY CLEANIN 11/09/01 MSDP/PS: IMAGING SYSTEM 11/06/01 PKDBC-JANITORIAL MAINT 10/16/01 PWS-CLOTHING 10/29/01 LAW-PUB DEF/QTRLY RECO 11/01/01 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENDER SV 09/05/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES 10/26/01 PS-TOWING SERVICES F6588V411 10/13/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 000F6588V4 10/20/01 PS-DELIVERY SERVICES 300662 30343 30339 10/31/01 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 10/29/01 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 10/29/01 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - --- Amount Paid 795.00 250.00 690.00 65.16 194.50 80.00 1,384.65 1,303.20 632.00 2,253.52 2,572.80 7,116.60 214 .12 208.52 16,102.00 101.33 145.52 83.08 23.39 3,762.50 272.50 42.50 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - -- -- 795.00 250.00 690.00 65.16 194.50 80.00 2,687.85 632.00 2,253.52 2,572.80 7,116.60 214.12 16,310.52 246.85 106.47 4,077.50 Page: 10 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10,08,34 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 11 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Date Vendor Invoice Inv.Date Description Amount Paid Check Total -----u -------- ----U_----------U_--U_---U_----- --UUU_- UU_--- ---------huuu_---- --------- ------------------ 163427 11/30/01 003919 LE, HUAN CA#22528FW 11/12/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2252 35.00 35.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163428 11/30/01 004054 WICKLANDER-ZULAWSKI & ASSOC 37370 11/08/01 PS-INTERVIEW COURSE 395.00 395.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163429 11/30/01 004060 DRILLCO NATIONAL GROUP INC 216243 11/08/01 SWMM-MISC TOOLS 317.00 317.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163430 11/30/01 004169 WWGCSA-WESTERN WASHINGTON G PKS-REGIST 11/16/01 PKM-FIELD MGT TRAINING 120.00 120.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163431 11/30/01 004190 BAYLEY, LILLY MAY CA#19293+ 11/06/01 MC-INTERPRETER, CA#l92 9 50.00 50.00 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163432 11/30/01 004218 TIM CO INC 70315 10/31/01 PWS-MISC SUPPLIES 44.39 44.39 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163433 11/30/01 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 003385 10/13/01 CDPL-NOTICE,RAMSAY SHO 126.50 Voucher, Bank Code, key 003384 10/13/01 CDPL-NOTICE,25% THRESH 126.50 003383 10/13/01 CDPL-NOTICE, CITY CORE 126.50 3223 07/18/01 CDPL-NOTICE,LAND USE A 158.13 537.63 163434 11/30/01 004293 MOTOROLA-MDUG 13201658 09/27/01 MSDP/PS VEH RADIO MODE 9,576.91 9,576.91 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163435 11/30/01 004298 KOSOFF-ROACH, MELANIE E SEPT INSTR 09/01/01 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES; 0 1,450.68 1,450.68 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163436 11/30/01 004317 RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PHOTO 1026058240 10/02/01 CAMERA SUPPLIES/FILM D 130.34 130.34 Voucher, Bank Code, key 163437 11/30/01 004397 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 10-1 06/01/01 PW-PALISADES RETREAT B 421.65 Voucher, Bank Code, key 12-1 08/01/01 PWD-EXP REV,E CAMPUS C 84.33 12 -3 08/01/01 PW-NEW HIGH SCHOOL 5,776.60 6,282.58 163438 11/30/01 004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLPMT SVC 2498 10/29/01 CDPL-MISC CODE AMENDME 500.40 Voucher, Bank Code, key 2500 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,SAVON DRU 83.82 2499 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,NEW H 10.20 2488 10/29/01 CDPL-EXP REV,GLENWOOD 836.17 2490 10/29/01 CDPL-EXP REV,U-HAUL FA 924.00 2497 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,STATI 83.82 2496 10/29/01 CDPL-MISC CODE AMENDME 45.00 2487 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,ST FR 43.56 2493 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,KELLER SU 44.22 2495 10/29/01 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV,FW C 214.50 2489 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN REV,RESIDENTI 16.50 2491 10/29/01 CDPL-PLN EXP REV,NEW H 1,188.00 2486 10/29/01 CDPL-PLAN EXP REV,E CA 13 7.94 4,128.13 ---- - u u_-- u- u_-- u_---- -_u - ----- -_uu_--_u_--u_--- -- - -uu- -_u - ----- - ------ - -- Page, 11 a chklst 11/30/2001 10: 08: 35 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Check Date Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total 163439 11/30/01 004494 Voucher: 163440 11/30/01 004566 Voucher: 163441 11/30/01 004599 Voucher: 163442 11/30/01 004622 Voucher: 163443 11/30/01 004644 Voucher: 163444 11/30/01 004701 Voucher: 163445 11/30/01 004763 Voucher: 163446 11/30/01 004840 Voucher: 163447 11/30/01 004855 Voucher: 163448 11/30/01 004863 Voucher: 163449 11/30/01 004895 Voucher: 163450 11/30/01 004963 Voucher: 163451 11/30/01 004977 Voucher: 163452 11/30/01 005004 Voucher: 163453 11/30/01 005019 Voucher: _n - - - nnn n_n -_n_- __n-un ONSET COMPUTER CORPORATION Bank Code: key G&M HONEST PERFORMANCE Bank Code: key GOLF LANDSCAPING INC Bank Code: key Invoice nn_n-h 63909.1 29824 298 -1 Inv.Date Description Amount Paid nn _nn--nn_n- nn_-n__n-n-n 937.00 10/17/01 SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES 10/10/01 MSFLT-ANTI FEEZE/WASHE 06/26/01 HYLEBOS CABIN PARK TRA WA STATE-TRAFFIC SAFETY COM PS WTSC CN 11/05/01 PS-WTSC CONFERENCE FEE Bank Code: key PACIFIC PLANTS INC Bank Code: key NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Bank Code: key SHOCKLEY, BILL Bank Code: key EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE Bank Code: key WST INC Bank Code: key VALLEY CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY Bank Code: key ABOU-ZAKI, KAMAL Bank Code: key SOUND PUBLISHING INC Bank Code: key BLIMP IE SUBS & SALADS Bank Code: key PWS-TREE R 11/15/01 PWS-TREE REPLACEMENT 0002682579 10/25/01 MSTEL-CE.LLULAR AIRTIME PS REIMB 100433 100418 100419 100460 100417 12846NOV 0380922 11/05/01 PS-REIMB: PERDIEM EX PEN 10/09/01 PS-COMPUTER INSTALL/LA 10/03/01 PS-INSTAL COMPUTER#900 10/03/01 PS-INSTALL COMPUTER#90 10/17/01 PS-REPAIR/SIREN 10/03/01 PS-POLICE GRAPHICS 11/02/01 MSGIS-BLACK INK SYSTEM 10/25/01 SWMM-WASH RACK STL LK CA#0021122 10/24/01 CA#21122+ INTERPRETER 010174 5976 MORRIS HANSEN ENTERPRISES I 9936 Bank Code: key 10/20/01 MSHR-POLICE RECRUIT AD 11/06/01 CC-COUNCIL MTG REFRESH 09/27/01 PRLS-GLASS CLNG UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST IN 21267696-0 10/05/01 PWS-BACKHOE/LOADER/FUE Bank Code: key OCT/NOV 10/26/01 SWM-RENTAL FORKLIFT n n-n- - --_n- nn- 937.00 6.86 6.86 23,015.66 23,015.66 300.00 300.00 16,646.40 16,646.40 1,471.93 1,471.93 43.00 43.00 634.18 679.97 620.29 32.55 217.00 2,183.99 876.32 876.32 126.08 126.08 346.94 346.94 162.00 162.00 56.80 56.80 103.00 103.00 587.71 2,990.13 3,577.84 --n-n-n__---n-n- Page: 12 0 chklst 11/30/200110,08,35 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 13 Check Vendor 0 ~ ~ ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 0 ~ = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = 0 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total Date 163454 11/30/01 005043 Voucher, 163455 11/30/01 005098 Voucher, 163456 11/30/01 005180 Voucher, 163457 11/30/01 005187 Voucher, 163458 11/30/01 005208 Voucher, 163459 11/30/01 005302 Voucher, 163460 11/30/01 005335 Voucher, 163461 11/30/01 005340 Voucher, 163462 11/30/01 005341 Voucher, 163463 11/30/01 005421 Voucher, 163464 11/30/01 005478 Voucher, 163465 11/30/01 005501 Voucher, 163466 11/30/01 005507 Voucher, 163467 11/30/01 005536 Voucher, 163468 11/30/01 005539 Voucher, Invoice u_--uuu__uuu- uu--uu Inv.Date Description u__u_u_--uuuuu - MACHINERY POWER & EQUIPMENT T0903702 Bank Code, key T0902602 BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO S Bank Code, key 241801 241611 241595 241602 241628 241598 241570 CRISIS MANAGEMENT CONSULT IN 01-26 Bank Code, key LINDSAY, JAMES Bank Code, key COMMERCIAL CARD SERVICES Bank Code, key PS-REIMB 11/16/01 SWMM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL 10/25/01 SWMM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL 10/16/01 10/09/01 10/08/01 10/09/01 10/10/01 10/09/01 10/08/01 PS-REPAIRS #902 PS-REPAIRS #620 PS-REPAIRS #621 PS-HEADLAMPS #516 PS-LOF #632 PS-BRAKE PADS/RELINE/R PS-REPAIRS #627 EXAUST 10/03/01 PWA-EMER MGMT CONSLT S 11/05/01 PS-REIMB,PER DIEM EXPE MARY FABER 10/31/01 MSF-CITY VISA,BATTERIE RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC 3229 Bank Code, key ECO NORTHWEST Bank Code, key SENIOR SERVICES OF SEATTLE Bank Code, key DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA Bank Code, key BARGER, KENNETH Bank Code, key LEBEL, SHELLEY Bank Code, key ANDREWS, AMY Bank Code, key CLIFTON, THOMAS E Bank Code, key LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC Bank Code, key SEMISI-TUPOU, VAIVAO Bank Code, key -- -- ------ ------ -_u_-- - --- ------- --_u ------- 4032 11/19/01 PWS-ROW LANDSCAPE MAIN 10/31/01 CDPL-CFW MARKET ANALYS PRCS SR LN 11/13/01 PRCS-SR LUNCH PROG CA21353FW+ 10/09/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2135 CA#18969+ 10/29/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#1896 PRCS REMBU 11/06/01 PRCS-3 INFLATABLES PRCS-REIMB 11/19/01 PRCS-FILM/PHOTO MNTS CA17321+0C 11/13/01 MC-INTERPRETER, CA#1732 10/15-11/5 11/16/01 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES, 10 1001295581 10/24/01 SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES CAO022007+ 10/30/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2200 Amount Paid --- uuu--u__u-u- 907.32 1,486.15 2,393.47 534.75 536.49 229.20 24.41 15.77 263.75 65.43 1,669.80 1,750.00 1,750.00 43.00 43.00 362.29 362.29 7,406.28 7,406.28 15,101.89 15,101.89 609.00 609.00 660.00 660.00 80.00 80.00 94.07 142.38 236.45 360.00 360.00 756.00 756.00 24.20 24.20 227.49 227.4 9 u__u-uu_u- Page, 13 0 chklst 11/30/200110,08,35 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page, 14 Check Date Vendor = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Check Total ---------- 163469 11/30/01 005545 Voucher, 163470 11/30/01 005546 Voucher, 163471 11/30/01 005565 Voucher, 163472 11/30/01 005568 Voucher, 163473 11/30/01 005614 Voucher, 163474 11/30/01 005617 Voucher, 163475 11/30/01 005622 Voucher, 163476 11/30/01 005623 Voucher, 163477 11/30/01 005625 Voucher, 163478 11/30/01 005657 Voucher, 163479 11/30/01 005668 Voucher, 163480 11/30/01 005715 Voucher, 163481 11/30/01 005817 Voucher, 163482 11/30/01 005828 Voucher, 163483 11/30/01 005859 Voucher, 163484 11/30/01 005920 Voucher, YSI INCORPORATED Bank Code, key ARCHIVE INDEX SYSTEMS INC Bank Code, key WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS Bank Code, key Invoice ---------- 403641 099513 1365 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DIVIS 200755 Bank Code, key 200753 AMB TOOLS & EQUIPMENT CO IN 255159 Bank Code, key BURNS, ED Bank Code, key CHELAN COUNTY TREASURER'S Bank Code, key THUILLIER, JENNIFER Bank Code, key I/O SOLUTIONS LLC Bank Code, key DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES Bank Code, key PS-REIMB Inv. Date Descript ion ---------------------- - 11/08/01 SWMWQ-MISC. SUPPLIES 11/09/01 MSDMS,DMS SFTWR MAINT 11/05/01 MSCOM-CELL ANTENNA 11/02/01 PWS-MISC. SUPPLIES 11/02/01 PKM-SKATE PARK SIGNAGE 10/23/01 PKM-BRASS FITTINGS/FLU 11/13/01 PS-REIMB,PER DIEM EXPN 7515AN JAI 10/09/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES SEPT PWSWR-DESI 11/09/01 PWSWR-DESIGN SERVICES PWSWR DES I 11/09/01 PWSWR-DESIGN SERVICES C9962A 10/30/01 MSHR, PO TESTING STUDY ABOOO03648 10/31/01 PS-AUTOTRACKXP LAW OFFICES OF DESMOND KOLK OCT2001 Bank Code, key ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS INC Bank Code, key CITY OF FIFE Bank Code, key K6163838K 004026 004068 MARINE VIEW SAND & GRAVEL L 731 Bank Code, key MDE INC Bank Code, key URS CORPORATION Bank Code, key ------------------- 2232 94217 ------------- 11/02/01 LAW-PUBLIC DEFENSE SVC 11/02/01 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE 10/05/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES SEPT. 11/05/01 PS-JAIL SERVICES, OCT 2 11/12/01 PWS-MIXED INERTS 10/13/01 MSDP-PS ADORE PALM PIL 10/03/01 SWM-ESA/NPDES GAP ANAL Amount Paid ---- ------------------ 282.70 282.70 5,430.00 5,430.00 19.38 19.38 57.75 504.78 562.53 200.63 200.63 60.00 60.00 14,976.00 14,976.00 130.00 375.00 505.00 625.00 625.00 695.00 695.00 1,950.00 1,950.00 1,258.30 1,258.30 20,097.00 20,664.00 40,761.00 367.10 367.10 628.32 628.32 12,773.01 12,773.01 ----- -- ------ ---- --- ------ --- ---- Page, 14 0 chklst 11/30/2001 10,08,35 Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page' 15 Check Vendor = = = = ~ = = = = = ~ ~ ~ = = ~ ~ ~ = = ~ = = ~ ~ = = = ~ ~ ~ = = = = ~ = = = = ~ = = ~ = = = = ~ ~ = = = = = ~ ~ = = = = ~ ~ = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = ~ = ~ ~ = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = ~ ~ ~ ~ = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = ~ = ~ = = ~ ~ = = ~ = = = = = = = ~ ~ = Check Total Date Invoice - u- - u --u- --u u -nu_- UUn UU- - -U-n U- 163485 11/30/01 005927 Voucher, 163486 11/30/01 005934 Voucher, 163487 11/30/01 005940 Voucher, 163488 11/30/01 005944 Voucher, 163489 11/30/01 006028 Voucher, 163490 11/30/01 006035 Voucher, 163491 11/30/01 006039 Voucher, 163492 11/30/01 006040 Voucher, 163493 11/30/01 006042 Voucher, 163494 11/30/01 006043 Voucher, 163495 11/30/01 006044 Voucher, 163496 11/30/01 006045 Voucher, 163497 11/30/01 006046 Voucher, 163498 11/30/01 006047 Voucher, 163499 11/30/01 006051 Voucher, 163500 11/30/01 703050 Voucher, 192 Checks in this report U- - U - U - n U - U - u- n - - - U U LEE, STANLEY S Bank Code, key K P TRANSLATION SERVICES Bank Code, key RUDDELL INTERNATIONAL Bank Code, key INDEPENDENT Bank Code, key FREEBORN LAW OFFICES PS Bank Code, key NACCARATO, STEVE D. Bank Code, key VISION QUEST CO. Bank Code, key WASHINGTON CISM NETWORK Bank Code, key R & T HOOD & DUCT SERVICES Bank Code, key KEARNS, LAUREN Bank Code, key SOUNDVIEW POTTERY, RUSSELL Bank Code, key CA#16504FW 10/08/01 DC-INTERPRETER,CA#1650 Inv.Date Description CA#21980 RU-7451 09/20/01 MC-INTERPRETER,CA#2198 10/10/01 PS-PS POL AIR CARTRIDG ASL OCT200 10/23/01 DC-INTERPRETER,TRAFFIC OCT8-10TH 10/29/01 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE{OCT8- PARC-ART E 10/23/01 ART EXHIBIT AT DUMAS B 998377 PS CISM 23074 08/29/01 PS-SHOE COVERS 10/30/01 PS-CISM NETWORK CONF F 08/20/01 PRLS-FIRE SYS SV CALL PRCS J/ALI 11/01/01 PRCS-JUROR-ARTS ALIVE PRCS J/ALI 11/01/01 PRCS-JUROR-ARTS ALIVE THE ART DOOR/GALLERY ROW, M PRCS J.ALI 11/01/01 PRCS-JUROR-ARTS ALIVE Bank Code, key CLAYMORE, INC Bank Code, key HSS INTERNATIONAL, INC Bank Code, key GRANGER COMPANY, THE Bank Code, key REID, JANINE O. Bank Code, key PS C.A.R. PS SNIPER 00000452 REIMB UUU-U_U 09/13/01 PS-C.A.R. INSTR COURSE 11/02/01 PS-ADV SNIPER TRAINING 11/03/01 PWS-APPRAISAL 10/25/01 PWCIP-APPRAISAL REIMBU Amount Paid 50.00 50.00 584.92 584.92 549.48 549.48 150.00 150.00 500.00 500.00 100.00 100.00 40.00 40.00 265.00 265.00 70.17 70.17 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 200.00 200.00 875.00 875.00 300.00 300.00 750.00 750.00 Total Checks, 752,535.08 Page, 15 MEETING DATE: January IS, 2002 ITEM# )l:Ce..) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Noyember 2001 Financial Report CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [g CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: November 2001 Financial Report SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was not reviewed by the Finance Committee due to cancellation of the December 26"' meeting. Forward directly to the January IS"' Council meeting. -....---------------------------- -------------....-----------....-----....---------- -----------------------------.----- --------------------------- PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye for the approyal of the Noyember 2001 Financial Report." ~~~~-~::~~~:;~~~~:~---~ -- -- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) ------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISEO - 05110/2001 12/24/2001 TO: FROM: cc: DAVID MOSELEY, CITY MANAGER ROBERT STERBANK, CITY ATTORNEY KATHY McCLUNG, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CARY ROE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR JENNIFER SCHRODER, PARKS DIRECTOR IWEN WANG, MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR ANNE KIRKPATRICK, PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR ANDREW ADEKOY A, FINANCIAL ANALYST THO KRAUS, FINANCIAL PLANNING SUPERVISOR DEREK MATHESON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER DONNA HANSON, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY KRISTA OSBORNE, PUBLIC SAFETY COMMANDER LAURA CAMDEN, PUBLIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALIST SANDRA WARTER, MUNICIPAL COURT ADMINISTRATOR NOVEMBER 2001 FINANCIAL REPORT PG# REPORT 1 - 19 NOVEMBER 2001 FINANCIAL REPORT 20 -21 22 - 24 25 - 32 33 34 35 - 36 37 38 - 39 40 -44 45 - 50 51 - 54 55 56 - 57 58 - 63 REVENUES PARKS & RECREATION REVENUES BUILDING PERMITS/ZONING FEESIPLAN CHECK FEES ROW PERMITSIPLAN REVIEW FEES/INSPECTION FEES DEPARTMENTAL VARIANCE ANALYSIS CITY COUNCIL MUNICIPAL COURT CITY MANAGER LAW MANAGEMENT SERVICES COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT PARKS AND RECREATION PUBLIC WORKS SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY K:\FIN\MFR\O Imfr\COV I.. R.DOC CITY IF ~ EIJERAL ~~AY !.!, -417(J ('(,1-+0(,2 CCA City for All of Us' 2001 Projêc::teð\Revenues & Expenditures Overview Significant Events General Government Revenues Expenditures Attachment A 2 -13 14-18 19 November 2001 Monthly Financial Report This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Strategic Reserve, Airport Strategic Reserve, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Centre. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures fmancial activity through October for the years 1996 through 2001. ~.~1U:!i~':f :;f. Highlights of Governor's Proposed 2002 Supplemental Budget: Some of the higJùights of Governor's 2002 supplemental budget include a $25.2 million elimination of Law and Justice MVET replacement funds. These funds would have been sent in July of 2002 for the year 2003. However, this fund elimination is not accompanied by any repeal of requirements or any replacement revenue sources. Another highlight is an $18 million elimination of Public Health MVET replacement funds. This also is not accompanied by any repeal of requirement or any replacement revenue sources. The employer pension rates for PERS dropped by 0.84%. The employee tates for PERS 2 also dropped to zero. However, the employee contribution rates for PERS I remain unchanged. These reductions in tates are a result of change in actuarial methods. State Forecasts an $813 Million Reduction in Revenue: Due to the tragic event of September I I'h, the State have had to revise its previously estimated General Fund revenue forecast for the 2001-03 biennium. The state reduced Its September estimate by $813 million from $22,021.7 million to $21,208.7 million in November. Of the $813 million reduction, $67.1 million is based on its collection experience since the initial September's estimate, $34.0 million is due to the passage of initiatives 747 and 773, and $69.4 million is due to lower interest earnings as a result of lower availability of funds for investment. The remaining $642.6 million reduction is due to weaker economic outlook, and an expectation of a national recession. Unemployment Rate at a 1 Oyear high: Employment fell sharply for the second month III a row in November, and unemployment rate reached a IO-year high of 5.7%, stated the U.S. Department of Labor. Non-farm payroll employment dropped by 331.000 following an even larger decline in October. November's Job losses were widespread as was the case in October. In the Northwest, Boeing contributed to the national Citv of Federal Wav November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report unemployment figures by giving out 60-day lay-ofT notices to apptOximately 20,000 employees on the 26'" of November. In addition, there was a 384,000 unemployment insurance claim for the week ending December 15, 2001. However, this was an 11,000 decrease ftOm the previous week's reported figure of395,000. GOVERNM]¡;NT AL REVENUES General governmental operating revenue collections through November total $40,515,008, which is $2,948,737 or 7.8% above the year-to-date budget of $37,566,272. Of this amount, $158,072 is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the payment of debt services. Attachment A ptOvides a comparison of year-to-date revenues by major sources for 2001 with comparative figures for the past 5 years. REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Period Ending December 31, 2001 ~ I~~~ . .2001:Ri!ViSedBLidaet . . °kl""ls ". .'.'. ".' Varian"" . "..'.. ..T~róiJg/! . :T6!'Q!>91).00. F¡j1(9~bIØ(lI!1fi¡v~;j¡~I~) '. . Aiirlliål..... '. NOvember: . : N6veriibeC . :.Dollars: $1':' 1"""""1(%): Property Taxes $ 6,976,393 $ 7,200,394 $ 7,195,266 $ 7,195,266 $ 0.0% Sales Tax $ 9,343,500 $ 9,905,347 $ 9,045,352 $ 9,466,978 421,626 4.7'Æ HoteVMotel Lodging Tax $ 110,603 $ 90,000 $ 83,024 $ 127,175 44,151 53.2% Criminal Justice Sales Tax $ 1,487,111 $ 1,589,767 $ 1,445,027 $ 1,530,411 85,384 5.9% Intergovernmental $ 3,174,808 $ 3,085,827 $ 2,788,878 $ 3,497,869 708,991 25.4% Real Estate Ex,"se Tax $ 1,996,568 $ 1,900,000 $ 1,742,024 $ 1,829,380 87,357 5.0% Gambling Taxes $ 1,449,605 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,323,914 $ 1,981,036 657,122 49.6% Utility Taxes $ 5,079,701 $ 6,016,400 $ 5,507,446 $ 5,578,161 70,715 1.3% Court Revenue $ 797,958 $ 865,784 $ 799,650 $ 932,711 133,061 16.6% Bulldin9 Pennits/Fees-CD $ 1,004,852 $ 1,099,804 $ 1,027,515 $ 984,404 (43,111) -4.2% Expedited Review Fees-CD $ 119,167 $ $ - $ 100,432 100,432 nJa ROW Pennits/Fees-PW $ 250,885 $ 259,583 $ 234,663 $ 325,037 90,374 38.5'Æ Expedited Review Fees-PW $ 40,211 $ $ $ 22,068 22,068 nJa Licenses $ 85,250 $ 174,809 $ 70,442 $ 70,442 0.0% Franc~ise Fees $ 496,418 $ 488,902 $ 468,902 $ 581,397 112,495 24.0% Recreation Fees $ 495,490 $ 611,896 $ 556,848 $ 547,718 (9,130) -1.6% Dumas Bay Centre $ 460,025 $ 488,300 $ 458,256 $ 547,003 88,747 19.4% Knutzen Family Theatre $ 68,686 $ 65,475 $ 56,368 $ 75,113 18,745 33.3% Interest Eamings $ 924,074 $ 841,319 $ 857,998 $ 857,998 - 0.0% IMmin I Cash Management Fees $ 156,337 $ 476,306 $ 441,920 $ 441,920 0.0% SWM Fees $ 3,009,893 $ 3,165,155 $ 2,915,866 $ 2,915,866 O.O'Æ Refuse Collection Fees $ 120,358 $ 153,013 $ 141,816 $ 137,160 (4,656) -3.3'Æ Police Services $ 720,535 $ 423,516 $ 336,530 $ 700,896 364,366 108.3% Other $ 60,834 $ 58,599 $ 68,566 $ 68,566 0.0% Liblotal: Oòei-atiniJ: Revenues" 38,429;262. .40;390;196:: : 37"566,212' . '40515008' . 2948.737' '7;8'1. Interfund Transfers - In 0.0% Other Financino Sources 7,230,373 6,490,930 5,421,849 5,421,849 - 0.0% otal Re\Ìenues & Oiher SòUrces. $ '46,659;635 $ '.46,8810126 .$.. . 42,968,121- $ 046936;857' 'os::.' 0 2:948,.731 6;9'1. -I I ! i I COMPARISON OF 2001 OPERATING REVENUES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL 43000000 3BOOOOOO Totol2001 Budgeted Revenue. $40,390,196 BOOOOOO 33000000 2BOOOOOO 23000000 'BOOOOOO '3000000 3000000 -2000000 ;2. Citv of Federal Wav November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report Property tax Property tax revenue collected through November total $7,195,266, which includes second half property taxes. Actual taxes received in November total $2,065,914, which is $1,025,838 or 98% higher than October's receipt. The large increase is due to second half property tax payments received in November. The first half payment was received in April/May. Real Estate Excise Tax Year-to-date Real Estate Excise tax revenue total $1,829,380, which is $87,357 or 5.0% above budget projections of $],742,024. The current months' receipt of$155,743 is also above the montWy estimate of$137,653 by $18,090 or 13.1%. There were a total of217 real estate transactions of which 74 were tax exempt and 8 were mobile home sales. November transactions consist mainly of a few major residential sales. $2,000,000 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX ACTIVITY Through November 2001 . ..1,'" 'Yo:. .;- ~."'~:.'-i:' 'Yo§>"'4' 7èó1i.+.~.. !\.' ~' ~"" .:1'1, "",,~ .,'" ","" íJl ;!! ! ¡ Jf " ¿ i 1;- -r Ò ~ $1,000,000 $. " ~ /Il ;!! 3 Citv of Federal Way November 2001 Monthly Financial RetJort Sales Tax Sales tax received through November of $9,466,978 is $421,626 or 4.7% above the year-to-date budget of $9,045,352. On a year- to-date basis, November 2001 Sales tax revenue is $123,478 or I % higher than November 2000 revenue of $9,343,500. Sales tax received in the month of November total $859,019, which is $13,446 or 1.6% above the adopted budget estimate of $844,572. A total of$835,083 in sales taxes was received in the month of December. "y 05' 37.737 64,333 5.9% 78,007 10.4% 34,868 5.0% 114,127 14.0% (92,123) -11.7% 38,119 5.0% 48,005 5.8% 11,102 1.2% 73,404 9.0% 13,448 Februa<y Ma"'" ., May Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 63.4% of all sales tax collections. However, on a year-to-date basis, November 2001 retail sales tax collections are $62,049 or .01% lower than November 2000. The decline would have been steeper ifnot for the monthly internal audit which resulted in recovery of over $76,000 on a year-to-date basis. Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 10.9% of sales tax collections is $9,274 or .09% above year 2000 activity. This continues to be a relatively high percentage of tax collection when compared to historical trend. We anticipate tax from construction to slow substantially in the later part of December, and into the next 9 to 18 months as indicated by the number of building permit applications received for new construction. Service industries accounts for 11.1 % of the total sales tax collections In the month of November. Service sales tax is up from the prior month by $107,004 or 11.3% On a year-to-date basis, service sales tax is up $162,807 or 16.5% from the year 2000. Hotels/motels, personal services and amusement/recreation accounts for most of the increase. 4- Citv of Federal Way November 20.0.1 Monthlv Financial Reoort Government activity through November total $138,052, which is an increase of$8,799 or 6.4% from the same period last year. -- Sales Tax Activity by Area 356,830 18.!JO/o 4.9% 88,167 1.5% 1.2% 107,076 na 1.4% 36,420 -1.2% 0.5% na 1.7% 40,075' 10.(1'10 0.5% 6.1% 16.6% '+Tf925;! -1.[1)6 11.6% +Tf\34'l,0N, -1.3% 4.3% " ilii82;651 4.7% 1.(1'/0 ,;ii120;51 -6.[1)6 1.5% '42,794 6.!JO1o 0.5% na -14.1% '3.8"A na -D..5% -5[1)6 43,966 -10.3'1 na na -D..5% -11.5% --'30,831 7.O'A na na 0.3% 5.6% 799 3.2"A 32% na na 2(1'/0 0.(1'10 1.9% 118,337 24,155 25.6"A 25.6% na na 1.2% 0.2% 24.(1'10 The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates over ]3.8% of the City's sales tax experienced a decline of$195,852 or 13.0% when compared to the year 2000. The decline is due in part to decreased construction activity, and the other is a result of continuous competition from Wal-Mart, which began its operation In March of 2000. Sales tax has decreased slightly from the prior month by $728 or .01%, with decreases in such areas as the retaiVgeneral merchandise and retail apparel accessories. However, there were slight increases in such areas as retail building materials and wholesale durable goods from the prior month. SeaTac Mall is showing a decrease of $36,389 or 3.8% when compared to the year 2000 activity. Sales tax has also slightly decreased from the prior month by $471 or .01%, with decreases in such areas as retail apparel accessories. retail eating and drinking, and retail furniture. Major Auto Sales have through November collected $381,520, which is S43,966 or 10.3% below the same period in 2000. This is due to higher car sales generated 111 2000 as a result of the passing of Initiative 695. Sales tax has also decreased slightly from the s Citvo(Federal Wav November 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort prior month by $1,392 or .02%, indicating a decrease in auto sales. South 312'h to South 316'h Block sales tax activity is $30,831 or 7.0% above the same period in 2000. However, November sales tax collection is $4,645 or 10.1% below the amount collected in October. Significant decreases could be seen in such areas as retaiVgeneral merchandise, retail automotive gas and wholesale durable goods. Hotels & Motels sales tax collected through November total $118,337, which is a $24,155 or 25.6% increase over the same period in 2000. Revenue has gradually increased, with the largest increase being between the years 1999 and 2000. The increase was a result of new hotel additions in Federal Way in the year 2000. However, there continues to be a decrease in HotellMotel Lodging Tax activities, due to the September II th incident. Due to further fear of travel, hoteVmotel sales tax fell by $2,538 or 22.8% from the prior month's collection of$II,141. SALES TAX BY AREA YTD through November, 2001 Olh" 65.4% S"T" M", '.e% p"moo Ceo", 2.0% M,jo, A""O' 4.0% S 348th 138% S 3121h 10 S 316th Gambling Tax Year-to-date gambling tax collection is $657,122 or 49.6% above the estimated budget of $1,323,914. On a year-to-date basis, November 2001 tax collection is $424,678 or 34.4% above the same period in 2000. November's collection is $39,214 or 30.8% above the monthly budget estimate of$I27,332. The year-to-date increase is due in part to the collection of $64,663 in delinquent taxes from one establishment. In addition, another establishment reopened its card room activity, which it had ceased operating between the periods of July 1999 and May 2000. Three establishments were delinquent in filing their October 2001 returns, however, we expect to receive these payments in Decembet. $193,344 178,6~ 183,941 238,928 168,101 185,526 188,82!j 150,734 . 168,691 157,781 168,546 $1,981;036 '$;1,981,036 $77,363 - 64,746 72,058 106,011 42,065 60,784 - 68,046 43,725 - 55,186 27,922 - - 39,214 $65T:1'22 $657,1~L 66.7% 56.9% 64.4% 79.8% 33.4% 48.7% 56.3% 40.9% 48.6% 21.5% 30.8% b Citv or Federal Way November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report Cardrooms Table reflects 9ambHn9 ac';,ily IhroU9h Oclober on a cash b"is. HoteVMotel Lodging Tax Hotel/motel lodging tax collected through November total $127,175, which is $44,151 or 49.1% above the estimated budget of $83,024. The amount collected represents activity from November 2000 to September 200]. The month-to-month budget is somewhat unreliable as only a year of history is available. H(}tEuMoTEL LODGING rAX RE\ÆH.JES 1999 - 2001 1999 2tIOO 2001 2fXJ1 Budget Month AK;Wa/ AK;Wa/ Budget . Al:fuaI S lIIoiance S Variance Janua<y $ $ 7,169 $ 7,168 $ 10,145 $ 2,977 41.5" Fetrua<y 6,255 6,255 10,977 4,722 75.5% Maæh 6,204 6,204 11,239 5,035 81.2% April 7,553 7,553 11,226 3,673 48.6% May 10,383 7,383 13,693 6,310 85.5% Jure 4,541 7,351 7,383 10,978 3,595 48.7% July 5,401 8,584 6,300 10,663 4,357 69.1% Augusl 5,689 12,100 7,894 9,933 2,039 25.8'" Se¡iember 8,538 15,569 8,894 16,071 7,177 &1" October 7,613 15,967 9,094 12,644 3,550 39 (fl. ~ 8,971 13,463 8.800 9,607 717 -~ ~ 6,428 11,904 6,976 0 (fl. YT1) Oct T- 40,753 110,603 83,024 127,175 44,151 53.2% Total $ 47,181 $ 122.507 $ 90,000 $ 127,175 $ 44,151 49.1% Utility Tax Utility tax received through November total $5,578,161 which is $70,715 or 1.3% above the estimated budget of $5,507,446, Compared to 2000, year-to-date November 2001 utility tax receipt is higher by $498,460 or 9.8%. Gas taxes exceed the estimated budget of $679,291 by $213,633 or 31.4% due mainly to two large rate increases implemented in the past 18 months. Cellular taxes also exceed the estimated budget of $719,019 by $196,231 or 27.3%, a growth n-end consistent with prior years. Conn-ary to expectations, the electrical utility tax is $74,093 or 4% below the 2000 collections. This was primarily due to the conservation efforts initiated during the energy crisis. 7 Citv of Federal Waf November 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort Phone Storm Drainage C,;lula, Pagers 1,747,356 892,924 331,751 539,000 1,004,948 137,828 915,250 9,104 :f:li;~ 31.< -6.; 4.1 -11.( -10.~ 27., -61./ 559,223 $ 12,473 580,723 11,817 595,183 47,995 8.8% 617,404 38,928 6.7% 544,080 15,818 3.0% 466,013 15,787 3.5% 435,775 (20,637) -4.5% 416,374 (5,324) -1.3'Æ 428,486 (19,709) -4.4% 468,209 (33,082) -6.6% 466,692 6,650 1.4'Æ Garbage 5.9% Cell" la' 16.4% Gas 16.0% ~ Ow of Federal Wav November 1001 Montlzlv Financial Reoort State Shared Revenue State shared revenue collected through November total $5,028,281 and exceeds the estimated budget of$4, 179,234 by $849,047 or 20.3%. The majority of the variance was due in part to a receipt of $470,179 in July of 2001 for local government financial assistance. In addition, there were significant increases in local criminal justice tax, fuel tax and vehicle license fees ÍÌom the prior month. '1>ptær1snu1Hy¡;m,,¡mms(l'W- Jnj irtreaDl;\t¡mlfu\¡< $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- STATE-SHARED REVENUES 1996-2001 av" LiO F." .F", T" CC,'m,," J,"", CE".Ii"Ii" .","°' <0 '" '" .... '" '" '" '" '" 0> 0> 0> 0 0 0 '" ~ 0 0 '" aMVET ~ Citv of Federal War November 2001 Montlllv Financial Reoort Court Reveuue Court revenue is $17,262 or 2.3% above year-to-date budget projections of $780,880 from fines and forfeitures. Total court revenue collected through November amounts to $932,711, which is $133,061 or 16.6% above the year-to-dale budget of $799,650, and is also above last year's activity by $62,970 or 7.2%. This is primarily due to the inclusion of adult probation services (B1, Inc.), and Traffic School Admin Fees. The base line court revenue is $43.852 or 5.3% below 2000 collections, primarily due to the reduction in traffic and non-parking citations, and criminal costs. our and other misdemeanors collected through November total $145,243, which is $50,960 or 54.1 % above the year-to-date budget of $94,283. Criminal costs collected year-to-date total $72,396, which is $24,642 or 51.6% above the estimated budget of $47,754. Parking infractions actual of $56,031 is above the year-Io-date budget of $26,529 by $29,502 or $111.2%. Traffic and Non-Parking are below the year-to-date budget of$509,289 by $60,310 or 11.8%, but are offset by Traffic School revenue total 0[$94,556. $36.495 $60.696 F,bro.", 37,71J3 66,750 .."h 46,373 04,382 Ap," 49,917 57,631 .. 51,288 52,203 73,420 J,,", 42,515 50,138 04,260 73,046 JII~ 46,166 52,491 60,666 71,957 """'" 88,695 65,123 61,751 97,179 S'pt~bw 36,993 66,626 72,313 71,311 O<tob" 41,043 66,176 74,540 60,635 N...m"', 30,341 45,710 66,501 71,763 C".mbw 29,904 67,590 55,693 65,100 ""-Cmn",~"'""",".~~" T.""""""M""'Fæ"""",."""'"eo""C"'""""" ill COURT REVENUE YTD Through November fIIiIB 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 ~ -'!' ¡ -'!'ó,'¡> #./' &'('- ToIaÌ 'O_=,-~,",," w..._"""Û>,,~ DTraffic School Adm Fee .Probatlon Seevlces 'GCourt I Rellenue .-- <31 , 2.J'Y, "- 4,7" .,16.6"" 10 Ci/¡l of Federal Wav November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report Building Permits and Plan Check Fees Building pemrit revenues collected through November total $984,404, which is below the budget estimate by $43,113 or 4.2%. This does not include a year-to-date pass through revenue of $1 00,432 for expedited and environmental review. Revenue collected for expedited review is not budgeted nor are the offsetting expenses. Building pemrits, which include mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade pemrits total $451,064 through the end of November, which is below the adopted budget of $525,706 by $74,642 or 14.2%. Electrical pennits total $89,119, which is below the adopted budget by $35,959 or 28.7%. Plan check fees collected through November total $340,198, which is $49,488 or 28.2% above the adopted budget of$290,710. Significant building pemrits during the month of November include 20 commercial alterations with a total valuation of $1,311,800; and 11 residential alterations with an $111,232 combined valuation. Ee,934 $ 54,814 $ 77,ffi1 $ 68,683 $ 68,358 $ 113,300 $ 45,042 81,164 33,œB 95,739 64,619 78,008 67,174 $ (11,814) 95,791 45,879 144,848 101,51.15 1œ,4æ 00,:115 $ (3,001) 68,250 62.ffi3 68,401 100,334 99,126 91,446 $ (7,600) 62.379 60,500 161,1(5 86,274 94,464 69,005 $ (2S,m) 51,em 1Œ,775 165,674 107,297 113,332 100,012 $ (13,:>Ð) 5O,cm 143,œJ 115,233 101,765 112.049 76,038 $ (;1;,011) -32.10/, ffi,711 129,553 134,783 63,482 101,874 99,765 $ (5,100) -4.9"Æ 61,Œ3 82.002 00,216 112.400 92,Z38 162.977 $ 70,739 76.7"Æ 47,776 107,654 52.3:5 119,tœ 86,183 51,:ID $ (34,800) -40.5"Æ 32.185 68,188 87,017 72,001 75,447 53,826 $ (21,621) -2ft7"Æ 47,978 52.975 68,100 72,125 72,289 O.a'Æ $ 9!3,117 $ 1,2111.39Ó $ 1,0!!I,~.$;if,iI2i;515 $ !1114,4)4 $ .(43,11~ ~ <,-4,.2', $j'~$ 9!!iI,(QI $ 1,288,040 $;' ..t~$1,_$ -,$ . (.g,113 1,855,tœ 1,933,057 2.0J1,00J 2,004,658 2.193,728 2,193,728 ra 39.61 :i)a'Æ 63,2"Æ 52.40/, 5O.1'Æ 44.9"Æ ra 35,7" 37.8"Æ ;I;.9"Æ :}l9"!. 41.4'Æ ra 1\ City of Federal Way November 2001 Monthlv Financial Revort The table below presents a synopsis of building pennit activity as of November 30. 200 I for new construction between 1999 and 2001: Building Division - Permit Activity YTD Through November, 2001 1999 2000 2001 ",TvpóofPer",it Pr,"t Valuól$1 prmt. VatÍJó($) ,Pr",¡ Viliu,,($! New Residential (Platted) 90 $ 4,950,879 55 $ 9,022,729 26 $ 3,652,929 New Commercial 15 24,732,949 20 25,807,541 20 34,167,158 New Multi-Family Units 6 2,628,427 12 3,819,904 6 1,789,927 New Public 0 0 0 0 0 0 .SubtOIaI'N,;""Corist<uctiori.:. ',11,1: $,: 32,31Ù55 , at $ ': j8;650,174 '52": $ '3~,610;014 Manufactured Homes 0 0 0 Residential Alterations 90 1,038,109 123 2,277,927 134 3,665,850 Commercial Alterations 190 12,760,799 216 12,157,928 238 18,824,018 Plumbing Only 23 0 60 0 77 0 Mechanical Only 405 4,572,032 347 1,484,539 331 1,672,389 Mise, Building Permits 0 0 0 0 0 : :Subtotal':Alt...tions : 708 $ 18,370,1140:' ':746"' : '$:: '15;$20:394:' :780: : $ 24.162,257 Electrical Permits 1280 0 1052 0 927 0 : Tot.' BIJildi"g l'ei'liHt.: ,:0: 819 $ :50;683.195,' ,8aZ '$', ':5{:570,568 832 : '$: ",63,772;27f Non-Building Permits: Sign Permits 278 24,145 340 1,026,530 253 505,146 ,:T"tål$: ' 278: $,: ,'24;145: 340,: $' "M2fii5aQ 253 ..$:' &0$;1~ ROW Permits and Fees Overall Public Works pennits and fees collected through November total $325,037, which is $90,374 or 38.5% above the year-to- date budget of $234,663, A year-to-date pass-through revenue of $22,068 for expedited review is not included in the pennits and fees, Plan review fees collected total $76,122, which is $66,918 or 41.6% below the budget estimate of $143,030 for the current period, July August September October 12- Citv of Federal Wav P.,mUs/Plen Th'DUgh November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report Police Services Revenue Police Services Revenue collected through November total $700,896. This amount includes Traffic School revenue of $94,556 and interest earnings of $20,755. Police Security services of $354,449 include payments from the Federal Way School District for semi-annual billing for school resources officer at Decatur, Federal Way and Truman High Schools. Also included is $92,411 of state seizure revenue. which is designated for that specific program. The remaining $138,725 balance is made up of mise en an eo us revenue such as, weapon pennits, police report copies, photographs, fingerprinting, and false alanns. $298,946 has been received in grant revenues this year, but is included in other financing sources. Traffic School and the Explorer program are currently not budgeted revenues, however these adjustments will be made during the carry forward budget adjustment. -: $ -: $ -: $ 5.133 $ 6,022 $ 3,300 12.184: 10,125: 5,932: 4,804 7,943 8,840 75: 1œ; 00; 53 00 8,Œ/: 9,374: 10.122: 10,336 11,318 11,179 26: 153: 004: 547 519 438 3.225: 3.Z37: 3,023: 3,281 3,425 3.623 37,825 88,270 149,513 349,œJ 267,048 354,449 124,488 51,011 92.411 85,396 00,975 94,556 20,910 20,755 13,945 8,œ.; 42.876 æ,w 12.411 9,718 æ,5OO 46,200 35,560 14,100 9,500 Z3,O43 481,263 200,476 288.948 - 190 $ Pdiœ & _ve Uœrßes O:rceaIaJ Pistd License ¡en Rream License Pdiœ Roxrt QØes Ftdo¡"ap1s Rrgerpints Pdiœ Sea.rity Slate Sei2I.res - Sei2I.res Jaffic Scrod & T raflic Safely Qæt 1- Earnings False Þmrs are- Msœll<>'1OOJS [e¡ MJires Caltrad [):œticn; & CmlriWims Q:Batirg T ræsfer I o-Galts cœs & UE8G G"ants ~,t: ~ Total ~~:: 13 Ci 0 Federal Wa GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES November 2001 Monthl Financial Re orl General governmental expenditures through November total $33,878,883 or 84% of the annual operating budget of $40,378,211. Operating expenditures are below year-to-date budget of $36,549, 118 by $2,670,235 or 7.3%. When compared to the year 2000, operating expenditures are up $2,971,924 or 9.6%. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT Period Ending November 30, 2001 "~1~\iíSðdBodt,ACtuais ' Through Through 'N()vembø~. . NOvember, . City Coundl 185,257 223,232 $ 207,225 $ 197,525 City Manager $ 366,176 $ 698,971 $ 631,524 $ 600,606 MunidpalCourt-Operations $ 696,704 $ 966,958 $ 931,349 $ 963,176 Management Services $ 1,387,633 $ 1,733,215 $ 1,536,056 $ 1,452,087 Civil/Criminal Legal Services $ 1,133,179 $ 1,266,589 $ 1,156,275 $ 1,051,903 Camm. Development Selvices $ 2,589,938 $ 3,582,627 $ 3,285,075 $ 2,713,020 Police Services $ 11,652,104 $ 13,483,627 $ 11,781,659 $ 11,888,320 Jail Services $ 1,486,660 $ 1,638,938 $ 1,345,187 $ 1,138,493 Parks and Recreation $ 2,741,994 $ 3,259,444 $ 2,992.783 $ 2,766,082 Public Works $ 2,711,653 $ 3,653,771 $ 3,239,412 $ 2,793,287 CityCNerlayProgram $ 1,389,940 $ 2,005,169 $ 1,981,174 $ 1,345,945 Snow & Ice Removal $ 8,441 $ - $ - $ Solid Waste $ 271,629 $ 405,777 $ 366,673 $ 290,822 HoteVMotei Lodging Tax $ 66,465 $ 107,702 $ 98,727 $ 25,778 Surface Water Management $ 1,321,866 $ 2,184,014 $ 1,932,284 $ 1,461,684 Debt Service $ 2,253,288 $ 4,528,541 $ 4,508,353 $ 4,508,353 Dumas Bay Centre $ 481,971 $ 474,587 $ 416,145 $ 503,986 Knutzen Famil Theatre $ 161,881 $ 165,048 $ 139,218 $ 137,815 $ub!0tiII ,in. ex " ,3().9P6;~~ '<,40;;!7R;2H$,54$,H8' ,33,871!,ß83 , Other Finandn Uses' 11,425,326 11,397,276 9,435,436 9,435,436 Jolale;,' ,liditq$&QtI1er~ $<42~;Z85$51;775.487 $45,98'1;554.<$<43;314,319,$,' rUther Hnaoong Uses are tJ-ose actl~ties considered one time In rature, COMPARISON OF 2001 OPERATING EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL Total 2001 Budgeted Expenditures $40,378,211 $40.000.000 $35,000,000 $30.000,000 $25.000,000 $20.000.000 $15,000.000 $10,000.000 $5.000,000 $- Jan Feb Mar Ap, May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct ------ , " Variance.,' ,", Favorabie ùrlfaliØråblÈi) , , , ' D61tðl'$($). 'ÞÐrci!IÌt(%» $ 9,701 4.70/. 30,918 4.90/. (51,828) -5.60/. 83,969 5.50/. 104,371 9.00/. 572,055 17.40/. (106,661) -0.90/. 206,694 15.40/. 206,701 6.90/. 446,125 13.80/. 635,228 32.10/. rJ 20.70/. rJ 24.40/. rJ -21.10/. 1.00/. . .7.3ÐÆ rJ < 5.SO/~ 75,850 72,949 470,600 (87,842) 1,403 2;67Q,235 ' '2,67Q.235 , ,< Nov Dee 14- Citv of Federal Wav November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report City Council Variance Analvsis: City Council expenditures total $] 97,525, which is below the budgetary estimate of $207,225 by $9,701 or 4.7%. The saving is due to Puget Sound Regional Council dues not being paid as of November 30th. Municipal Court Variance Analvsis: Municipal Court Operations expenditures total $983,176, which is above the budgetary estimate of $931 ,349 by $51,828 or 5.6%. Professional services include approximately $89,329 for the B] contract for adult probationary services through the month of November, but this has offsetting revenues. The mid-biennium budget adjustment totaling $122K ($90K probations services, $4K juror fees and $28K security officers salary) will offset the unfavorable variance in December's report. City Manager: Variance Analvsis: Activity through November total $600,606 and is below the budget estimate of $63],524 by $30,918 or 4.9%. The variance is primarily due to salary savings in earlier part of the year, and the Management Intern position that was finally filled in September. CiviVCriminal Legal Variance Analvsis: Activity through November total $1,051,903 and is below the budget estimate of$I,156,275 by $]04,371 or 9.0%. Savings can be found in Civil Lega] Services salary and benefits, outside legal counsel/litigation specialist cost (have expended $39K or 44.3% of $88K annual budget), and public defense attorney services (have expended $]90 or 81.7% of its $233K annual budget). Management Services Variance Analvsis: Activity through November total $1,452,087, which is $83,969 or 5.5% below the year-to-date budget estimate of $],536,056. Although Human Resources division has expended its budget for job announcements, savings can be found primarily in one-time fund internal service charges for the Kronos Timekeeping System, Docwnent Imaging System, and the Eden Financial System upgrade. Community Development Variance Analvsis: Through November, CD is below their year-to-date budget estimate of $3,285,075 by $572,055 or 17.4%. The savings are primarily due to unfilled positions in Human Services during the earliet part of the year. In addition, one-time funded programs such as the planned action SEPA contracted services, PAA planning, compensation plan update, and code amendments have not been fully expended on a year-to-date basis. Parks and Recreation Variance Analvsis: Parks Operations expenditures through November total $2,786,082, which is $206,701 or 6.9% below year-to-date budget estimate of $2,992,783. Savings can be found in Park Maintenance (76.8% expended year-to-date), and in various one-time funded programs such as tree replacement and e-commerce recreation class registration that have not been spent to date, but we anticipate some increased activity by year-end. Dumas Bav Centre: Operating expenditures through November total $503,986, which exceeds the year-to-date budget estimate of $416,145 by $87,842 or 21.1%. This is primarily due to an increase in professional services, specifically catering, custodia] and cleaning charges, as well as electrical charges. The increase in expenditmes is offset by an $88,747 or 19.4% favorable revenue variance. Knutzen Fami]v Theatre: Operatiug expenditures through November total $137,8]5, which is 83% of the total year adopted budget of$165,048. Total expenditures are also below year-to-date budget estimate of $139,313 by $1.403 or 1%. Year-to-date revenue of $75,311 exceeds the budget estimate of $56,368 by $18,745 or 33.3%. The favorable revenue variance willlike]y be offset by expected increased expenditures in the later part of the year. IS Citv of Federal Way November 2001 Monthlv Financial Report The table below summarizes recreation and cultural services and Dumas Bay Centre activity, and their related recovery rates: Community Center Senior Services Special Populations Youth Commission Adult Athletics Youth Athletics Aquatics Celebration Park Arts & Special Events Community Recreation - White & Blue 88.1% 97.2% 97.0% 82.9% 138.2% 93.0% 143.3% 96.1% 132.2% 73.7% 118.7% 99.7% 83.7% 95.6% ,TOJfI<!>.RI~¡,utATION Dumas Bay Centre Knutzen Famil Theatre ! TOTAL DUMAS BAY CENTRa $ Arts Commission 1 ""eo", do Got ""ode "'0" oc op"",o, 1""le" ',p,"dilo'.' do 001 ""ode ""'",1 eqo'~ 1""le" oc othe, 'oto"ood ",oIObo"'" 33.0% 13.8% 30.3% 27.8% 183.0% 71.7% 9.8% 21.3% 52.7% 104.3% 62.4% 63.7% nla 37.5% 14.0% 37.4% nla 130.8% 101.3% 0.6% 12.3% 26.7% 125.6% 32.4% 58.3% nla 45.2% 108.5% 54.5% 96.9%1 nla ,~-- Recreation and Cultural Services: Total revenue of $558,487 is $53,409 or 8.7% below the year-to-date budget of $611,896. Direct program expenditure total of $957,624 is 99.7% of the $960,761 annual budget. Recreation services have recovered 58.3% of direct program costs year-to-date. When total administrative expenditure of$278,602 is included, the total recovery ratio is 45.2%. Dumas Bav Centre: Operating revenue total $547,003, which is $58,703 or 12% above year-to-date budget estimate of$488.300. However, operating expenditure total of $503,986 is $29,399 or 6.2% above year-to-date budget estimate of $474,587. The Dumas Bay Centre has recovered 108.5% of its' total operating costs. Knutzen Familv Theatre: Operating revenue through November total $75,113, which is $9,638 or 14.7% above year-to-date budget estimate of $65,475. Total operating expenditure of $137,815 is $27,233 or 16.5% below year-to-date budget estimate of $165,048. The Knutzen Family Theatre has also recovered 54.5% of its' total operating costs. Public Works Variance Analvsis Pub/ic Works Operations: Expenditures are below November year-to-date budget estimate of$3,239.412 by $446,125 or 13.8%. Public works have also expended $2,793,287 or 76.4% of its $3,653,771 annual appropriation. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs (such as transportation model update and tree replacement), which are 46.7% expended year-to-date. Some contracted services payments have also not yet been made. Solid Waste and Recycling Operations: Expenditures are below year-to-date budget projections of $366.673 by $75,850 or 20.7%. Savings could be seen in the special recycling and composting bins events that took place in September and Gctobet of this year. Surface Water Managcmem Operations: Expenditures are below November year-to-date budget projections of $1,932,284 by $470,600 or 24.4%. Savings are due primarily to unfilled budgeted positIons within the division. and the NPDES/ESA one-time funded program. Ib Citl' of Federal Wal' November 2001 Monthlv Fiaaacitri Revort Public Safety <~ Jail Services Variance Aualvsis: Police Services have expended $11,888,302 thtOugh November, which exceeds the year-to-date budget ptOjection of$11,781,659 by$106,6610r.09%. The table below represents police operating revenue collected through November 200 I. .¡$ -:$ -¡$ _'.~.18'--:-___-.!O,125:. 5.~32_: Police Report CoP'"s- - _8!~;~: -_.. ._--",~:: 10,~~L- _'0,".3_6. ""otog,aphs 26¡ 1531 -904, 547 ",nge,p,:nts. - . -------.-.---.--- -- 3,22~j 3,237 ¡ ---_3.0231~.... .:!,2!J. PoI~e Secu"ty 37,825 88,270 I 149.513 349,080 ~~:i;~:le~i~~;is-- ~---i-- 146,113] ----20,28~ [ -- ~1':fs~~~_:~:::: Teaff,e School & Traffic Safety G'ant , 3.725 I 19,514 56,008 I 80.975 ~te';~t8,-;-~¡~gS I 3,539 I 12,569 20,818 20,910 ~~~~~~~;t;~-----~]~-=__~~=I--- ,~- =--=~~t_~=~:!~~ Donations & Cont,ibutions ,700i 616 2,899 14,180 ~.u !"tà e ~ 21 5 64 Ope,ating T'ansf., h-Gran!s COPS & LLffiG Grants 53 _-",318 519 ----2~ -- ___2~~8- 51.011 3,399 8,840 60 .'.','.7!) 438 .._-'~2"-- _35.4,4.49 _¿¡2~'-- 8,066 12,411 46,200 9,500 94,556 20,755 -----~~~ 9.718 ---"'~<J. 23,043 481,26; i 841,192 ~.!l ,. 2. 563,910 209,476 298,946 ~11 n 6 ,9 Iii Jail Services: Jail services are below the 10-month budget estimate of $1,345,187 by $206,694 or 15.4%. The expended total of $1,138,493 includes jail services paid through the month of September. The chart below reflects 10 months of jail costs and maintenance, as of the end of November. Jail Costs vs Maintenance Days Through November 2001 $1,400,000 In ;; 0 (J $800,000 1,910 $1,117,710 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 " 12,000 ¡¡ 10,000 ¡¡ 8,000 .~ 6,000 :E 4,000 2,000 .'-".--- $1,200,000 $1,000,000 ~ $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 ~Expend¡tures -+-Cases \1 Citv of Federal Way November 1001 Monthlv Financial Reoort Operating Expenditures By Category The chart below shows operating expenditures and financing uses through November 30,2001 by category or object code: 050 City Manager Contingency Fund 784,541 1.5% 0.0% 100 Personnel Services 16,396,314 14,547,314 31.7% 88.7% 200 Benefits 3.423,777 3,035,843 6.6% 88.7% 300 Supplies 1,141,426 691,932 2.2% 60.6% 400 Other Services and Charges 5,167,436 3,701,134 10.0% 71.6% 500 Inter90vernmental ServiceslTaxes 3,327,860 2,4S7,828 6.4% 74.8% 552 'nterfund Contributions 10,137,539 9,031,495 19.6% 89.1% 561 Residual Equity Transfers 460,951 201,753 0.9% 43.8% 600 Capital Outlays 2,016,068 1,236,227 3.9% 61.3% 700 Debt Service - Principal 3,094,362 2,931,471 6.0% 94.7% 800 Debt Service - Interest 1,641,331 1,781,911 3.2% 108.6% 900 Interfund Svc Pa ments 4,183,882 3,667.411 8.1% 87.7% Totat 0 eratin Ex endlture. t U.e. 51,775,487 43,314,319 99.8% 83.7% Personnel services and benefits, which comprises 32% of the operating budget, is 88.8% expended. Included in this number are salaries and wages, temporary help, seasonal help, overtime pay, overtime-private security and tennination pay. Other services and charges have expended only 71.6% of its $5,167,436 annual budget, with savings in City Manager, Law, Parks, Public Works, SWM, and Public Safety. Capital outlays, which includes $1.8 million for the arterial streets overlay project, is 62% expended. Interfund Contributions, which is 19,6% of total operating budget has been 89.1% expended year-to-date. Internal service payments are currently at 87.7%, which represents II months of maintenance and operations expenses. ,g Citv of Federal Wav FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY: .: . .. ... : ".~. !>/¥Ierilt/S~tt="nd: Debt SeMce F,",d:( t) Special Revenue: Arterial Street UtilityTax (1) Solid Waste & Recycling Special Study (Gov. TV) Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 2% lor the Arts CDBG Paths & Trails Strategic/Airport Reserve $t!llIølilt$~~tRtiVet1Í1!!t"Jiil(t$.:. Capitat Project: Public Safety Facility Downtown Revitalization Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds Celebration Park Park Improvements Surface Water Management Transportation S¡¡bløWÞ¡¡ÞiW F'ri¡¡~I'" . Enterprise Funds: Surface Water Management Dumas Bay Centre Operations Dumas Bay Centre Capital Knutzen Family Theatre Capital Knutzen Family Theatre Operations Subtotal Enterprise Funds Internal Service Funds: (2) Risk Management Inlonnetion Systems Mail & Duplication Fleet & Equipment Buildings & Furnishings Subtotal Internal Service Funds Total All Funds November 2001 Monthlv Financial Reoort FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY .aøgjnrnt1gF~t1d . ~ Ii. ~ent1~ .E::UZd. eal~ni;¡,,¡t111iot . Inl(O~tj . . 11/30101... $:. ~,7~0,<145 $ 2$;$1$;49$. $ 5;364;~$2 1,569,379 5,706,592 221,254 25,143 131,105 5,000 103,047 9,647 62,694 1;1l~;~3 280,938 59,268 870 5,507 593,396 2,120,797 5,773,011 : .~;1133;7~~ 3,189,626 548,012 321.454 1,375 171,783 4,232,250 2,793,861 1.463,555 175,700 947,176 678,301 6,058,594 61,841,840 $ 26,546,378 $ 4,759,215 1,345,945 4,448,783 290,822 11,866 25,778 107,594 2,060,718 8,291,507 69,002 11,079 964,144 314,231 5,730,140 7,088,596 . 3,194,878 503,986 137,815 3,836,679 463,702 1,123,980 114.453 984,004 250,537 2,916,675 53,439,051 $ 2;971;71$: .$ 6tIM37. 223,434 1,257,809 (69,568) 13,277 105,327 5,000 (4,547) 9,647 (1,998,024) (4$7;$.#) .: 280,938 (9,734) 870 (5,572) (370,748) 1,806,568 42,871 li7~;I!10 (5,251) 44,026 307,446 1,375 33,968 381,563 2,330,160 339,575 61,247 (16,827) 427,764 3,141,918 8,388,378 $ 9,$$~.18(j :'8;:$3i1~ 710,928 5,665,069 205,891 124,325 163,811 24,274 1,892 42,061 30,270 ~;~$~~ 6,616,466 1,339,696 20,829 155,226 509,806 7,194,613 9,903,779 .25;.131>.41$ 746,143 44,026 307,446 32,919 33,988 1,184,501 3,955,063 1,739,704 214,818 1,787,820 1,393,546 9,090,950 59,039,706 (1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service. (2) Internal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpose of fixed asset replacement ..5,787,$22 . 487,494 4.407,260 275.459 111,048 58,464 19,274 6,439 32.414 2,028,294 7;.42IM~ 6,335,528 1,349.430 19,959 160,797 880,555 5,378,047 9,860,908 . :23,9IlS,2.24 751,394 31,544 782,938 $ 1,624,903 1.400,129 153,571 1,804,647 965,782 5,949,032 50,651,327 $ Ie¡ ATTACHMENT A CITY OF FEOERAL WAY SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES OPERATING FUNDS Through Navemb., 2001 1996 - 2001 $15,128,342 $15,694,065 ¡ $20,782,508 $20,T82,508 $20,782,508 $ 0.0% 1 5,970.665 5,521.760 6,430.603 6,176,60e 1 7,200.394 7.195,266 7,195,266 0.0% 6.976.393 7,352,502 7,501.3B5 1 7,9B2.153 B.BOB,1B2 9,343.500 9,905,347; 9.045,352 9,466,97B 421,626 4.7% 1,148,90; 1 40,753 110,603 90,000, B3,024 127.175 44,151 1 53.2% B53,2BB 1,005,140, 1,342.410 I 1.4B7.111 1.5<9.767 1.445,027 1.530,411 B5,3B4 1 5.9% 4.343,100 4.4B4.091 , 3,547.922 1 4,B43,407 3.m.BOB 3,OB5,B27 2,7BB.B7B 3,497,869 70B,991 25,4% 1.313,992 ,.671,O24 2,09B,B21 , 2,250,267 1,995.56B 1,900,000 1.742,024 1.B29,3BO e7.357 5.0% 273,252 29B,997 350.804 1.311.973 1.449,605' 1.450.000 1,323,9141 1,981,036 657,122 49.6% 719,063 3,1B2.371 , 4,199.5721 4,788.444 5.079,701 6,015.400 5,507.445 1 5,57B,161 70,715 1.3% 479,560 503,236 696,407 I 5B2,719 797.95B B55,7B4 I 799,650 932,711 I :¡;:~~¿)I 15.5% 535,7B4 6B7,292 913,117 1.21B,B90 1,O04,B52 1,O99,B04' 1,027,515 ¡ 9B4,404 -4.2% 45.125 B5.B33 1 119.157 .1 100,432 100,432 ' of. 1<2.384 169,774 232.9B51 199,1B1 250.BB5 259M3 234.663 325.037 90,374 38.5% 40.979 59,492 40,211 22.06B 22,068 1 of. 57,Ð76 51,497 45,194 127.B57 B5.250 174.B09 70,442 70,442 0,0% 406.479 471.313 452.547 I 459.923 496.41BI 45B.902 45B.902 5B1,397 112.495 : 24.0% 377,B61 3B5.530 401.954 ! 543,773 495.490 511,B96 555.B4B 547.71B (9,'3D)1 -1.6% 259,110 31B,30~ I 329,497 467,777 460,025 4BB,3oo 4;::;~: 1 547.003 BB,747 19.4% 10,102 42.790 6B,686 1 65.475 75,113 1B,745 , 33.3% 554.172 511,430 B02.052 95B,75e 924.074 B41.319 B57,99B B57,99B :1 00% 141,9<9 149,173 152.157 154,440 156.337 476,306 441,9201 441,920 0.0% 2,934,767 2,676,6391 2,93B,513 3,465.534 3,O09,B93 3,165,155 2,915,B66 2,915,866 0.0% 131,931 131,282 135,103 135.770 120'3581 153.013 141.B16 137.160 (4,656)' -3,4% 696.715 I 15e.464 2B3,975 720,535 4;~:;~: 1 336,530 700.896 364.366 10B.3% 925,661 1,130.106 2,043,335 141.2B9 60,B34 6B,606 68.566 0.0% . .27"22;6-<2 '31;100,839 .$,022;868-:. 38;820,054' '.38,428;282> .40;3aO,I... 37,566,272 '.40;616...8.. ' 2",*,737 7:8% 1 9,701 1 47% 167,448 178.402 [ 182.268 I 1BO,027 1B5,257 223,232 207,225 197,525 444,602 4B6,057 5O2,9B2 525.596 366,176 698,971 531.524 600,606 30,91B' 4.9% 1,240.9"; 1,405,41; 1 33e,945 696.704 966,958 , 931,349 983.176 (51'B2B)1 .5.6% 1,293,270 1,493,265 ',387,B33 1,733,215: 1,535,056 1,452.0B7 B3,969 5.5% 1,O66.B50 1.163,B06 1,427,473 1.143,B38 1,133,179 ',255,5B9! 1,156,275 1,051,903 104,371 9.0% 2,456.004 2,3D3.170 2.434,310 2.5BO.329 2,5B9.938 3.562.527 3,2B5.075 2,713,020 572.055 17.4% B.321 ,974 B,B31 ,900 9,B90.079 I 10,B77.663 11.652.104 13,4B3,527 11.7B1.659 11,BBB.320 (106'651)1 -D9% 654,971 B22.20B 1.026,429 1,509,193 1,4B6.660 1,63B,93B ¡ 1.345,1B7, 1,13B"'3 206.694 15.4% 2,793,225 2,397,231 2,453,333 2.904,175 2,741,994 3,259,444, 2,992.7831 2,786,OB2 208,70' 69% 2,594,737 2,729.624 2.940,425 2.771,941 2,711,653 3,553.771 3,239.412 , 2,793,2B7 446,125' 13.B% B58,926 1,602,556 ,.796.1931 1,759,401 1.3<9,940 2,005,169 1.9B1.174 1,345.945 635.2281 32.1% 45,406 56,292 34,602 20,238 8.441 0.0% 245,795 446.448 266,536 1 215,571 271,629 405.777 ':=~~; 1 290,822 75,650 20.7% '01 66.465 107.702 25,778 72.949 73.9% 1.371,194 1,2B7,857 1.2B7.862 1,355,451 1,321.B66 2,IB4.014 1.932,2B4 1.461.5B4 470,500 24.4% 649.942 719,379 1.040,B24 5,3D5,731 2,253,28B 4,52B,541 4.50B,353 4.50B,353 0.0% 353,163 376,476 360,740 450,155 4B1,971 474.5B7 416,145 5O3,9B6 (B7,842) , -21.1% 67,855 111.793 161.661 165.04B 139.21B 137,815 1,403 1.0% 27,107,32B 33.554,413 30,90B,959 40,378,211 36,549,1" 33,878,883 2,070,235 7.3% I " 7,915,329 5,005,542 7,622,303 11,9B5 1,017,154 6,B30,12B 5,618,972 552.4% I 2,B22,839 5.3B',05BI 7,230,373! 6.490.930 5,421,849 5,421,849 0.0% Oth.. Financing Um 5,391,5241 2.034,3721 9,253.813 11,425.3261 11,397,276 9.435,436 9,435,4361 -! 0.0% Ending Fund Balance 205.B91 1 Sond Wa"e 213.050 296,991 1 294,316 299,842 196.3031 259.377 ofa ofa S"",,&I,e 103,239 73,35B 103.530 ' 100,000 95,575 ofa ofa Arterial SI,.el 362,100 470.902 477,375 349,431 456,790 41,B59 710,92B ofa ofa UtinlyT., 1,606,52; 1 2,120,030 2,B30.14B 4,944.6841 6,220.B6B 5.665.0691 ofa, oIa SWM 1.077,666 2.276,459 1,643,113 B12,213 324,40B 746.143 ofa ofa Palh & T,aH, 5{),210 6.153 , 12.555 22,353 3',474 , 41,414 42,081 ofa ofa SI'alegic Re,eNe 2,050,477 2,022,3B9 2,025,496 2.02B.204 2.033.B32 1 30.270 1 ofa ofa Debl SeNice ',818.9091 2,9:~:~~; 1 5.283.4B2 5,746,50B 4,5<11.433 6,41B,O13 6,393,15e of. ofa D,ma, Bay Cenl,e 115,131 13.2B6 47,775 35,745 20,140 102,904 ofa ofa Police 1,OB2.2O7 7B6,441 ~:~;~ i ~~:~~~ ! 669.334 3OO.oo~ 1 ofa ofa P3 :! 300,000 300.000 300,000 nla ofa Inlem,"d Loa", 10,000 10,000 4,O;~:~~~ 1 7,3:~~~! 10.000 10,OOO! ofa nla U",e,eNed 3.B54,369 9,O63,66B 3.532.267 1,434,B98 9,19B.623 ofa r¡,...~.< '.fu..aala"". $<M4$'151$11øøn57 $-17 235;237 $'6;136 .W'$~1 .~~22!><$jPi!Ø~ $ $~3'.5W:<$,., 010 12/26/200110:22 AM MEETING DATE: January IS, 2002 ITEM# .-m: (a) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS TO COUNCIL & REGIONAL COMMITTEES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION ~ CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: None SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure, Section 21, the Mayor makes committee appointments each January, taking into consideration the interests and requests of individual Councilmembers. Members, serve one-year tenDs, with each committee consisting of three members. The following committees haye been established: (1) Finance/Economic Deyelopment/Regional Affairs (2) Land Userrransportation (3) ParkslRecreation/Human Services/Public Safety There may also be appointments other community and regional committees which haye city appointment authority. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nJa PROPOSED MOTION: NO MOTION IS REQUIRED. Mayor Jeanne Burbidge will announce her committee appointments for the year 2002. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1 Sf reading Enactment reading MEETING DATE: January IS, 2002 ITEM# '"SZl(b~ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION IZI CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: none SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At a special meeting on January IS, 2002, the City Council will interview applicants to fill three (3) vacant commissioner positions on the city's Arts Commission. Councilmembers will confirm their appointments at that evening's regular meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: none PROPOSED MOTION: "I moye the appointment of the following persons to the city's Arts Commission: all with 3- year terms ending on December 31,2004". (The City Clerk will arrange for introduction and presentation of the appointment certificates for the new appointees at the February S'" regular meeting) CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~\ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 OXFORD HOUSE REPORT City of Federal Way January 14,2002 Prepared by City of Federal Way Staff .. Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS 3. PROGRAM........................-......................................................................-.....-.........................4 a. Activities and Daily Schedule..............................................................................................4 b. CriteriaiScreeninglBackground Check for Residents ...........................-........-.............-......4 i. ii. Application and Screening Process .......................-....-...-.-......................................4 Criteria for Selection of Residents .5.......................,................................................. c. Supervision of Residents ............"................................................-.................................-....5 d. Therapy Philosophy .............-..................-............................""""""""""".........................5 e. Oxford House and Similar Facilities ...................................................................................6 i. ii. How Many Oxford Houses are Located in King County?......................................6 Have Other Similar Houses Been Established in Federal Way? ............................6 4. FUNDING / CDBG .............................................."..................................................................7 a. What is the total funding for this program and where did it come from? ...........................7 b. AIe any other South King County cities funding this project? ...........................................7 c. Was there notice required by CDBG funding? ...................................................................7 d. What Was the Role of King County Housing Authority? Did the City Have any Role in Site Location?............................................................ 7 e. Can the City withdraw the CDBG funding for this project?............................................. 8 5. DATA...................................................................................................................................-... 8 a. Data regarding effectiveness of the program...................................................................... 8 i. ii. Anecdotal and quantitative.................................................._.................................. 8 Success Rate......_..............-.....-..............................-.............................................. 9 b. Crime Data.......................................................................................................................... 9 i. ii. Introduction................................-....-..-................-.................................,............... 9 Oxford Houses - Chart ..................-......................................................................1 0 6. LEGAL ISSUES - QUESTION AND SHORT ANSWER ....................................................14 a. What effect does the Federal Fair Housing AInendments Act of 1988 have on the Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house? ....................................14 b. What Effect Does the Washington Housing Policy Act have on the Oxford House's Request to Occupy the Twin Lakes House?...................................-..-........... 15 c. May the City Enforce the Twin Lakes Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("CC&Rs)?....................................................._.............................................-...............15 d. If the City May Not Enforce the TwiIr Lakes CC&Rs, May the City pay the Costs of the Homeowners' Litigation to Enforce Them? ....-.........................................-.................15 e. Is the City Prohibited By the CC&Rs from Approving Uses that Might Violate the CC&Rs? ....................................................................................................15 f. May the City Require the Oxford House to Obtain a Home Occupation Land Use Approval Prior to Occupying the Twin Lakes House? 15 g. May the City Require the Oxford House to Obtain a Business License Prior to Occupying the Twin Lakes House? 15 h. May the City Withdraw or Modify its Decision to Provide Community Development Block Grant funding to the Compass Center? ....-............................................................16 i. Is the City Financially Liable for the Activity of the Twin Lakes House Residents?.....l6 j. If the City May Not Take Any Action Concerning the Oxford House's Proposal to Occupy the Twin Lakes House, What Options (if any) Does the City Council have with Respect to any Future Oxford House or Other Group Home Applications?........................................._..........._........................................... 16 7. SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 16 ATTACHMENTS: A. Legal Analysis B. King County CDBG Consortium - 2001 CDBG Pass-through City Project Application C. Compass Center Letter Dated July 13, 200 I, to Director of Community Development Requesting Letter of Determination D. City's letter dated August 3, 2001, to Compass Center in Response to Request for Letter Of Detennination E. Compass Center Letter Dated October 5, 2001, Inviting City Staff To Attend Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association Meeting F. Electronic Mail from Ken Guza, of Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). G. Application for Membership In Oxford House. H. Suggested Oxford House Interview Questions and Interview Etiquette. I. Compass Center Management Plan for Oxford Houses. 1. Map of Oxford House Locations in King County. K. 1999 Evaluation of Washington State ~etwork of Oxford Houses MISCELLANEOUS ATTACHMENTS: L. Oxford House Expectations M. Oxford House - The Concept - A System of Operations and Traditions ii 1. INTRODUCTION At the City Council meeting on January 2, 2002, a number of issues and questions were raised by residents of the Twin Lakes community concerning the location of an Oxford House for recovering alcohol and drug abusers within the Twin Lakes neighborhood. At this meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a report on this issue and to present the report to the Council at the January 15,2002 meeting. The issues and questions addressed in this report were taken from those that were identified by Councilmembers, citizen comments at the January 2nd Council meeting and electronic mail received subsequent to the meeting. Since the January 2nd Council meeting, City staff researched the factual and legal questions, and have attempted to address most, if not all, of the issues that have been identified. The infonnation contained in this report comes from several sources including a review of relevant documents, crime data infonnation, interviews with Compass Center and Oxford House staff, and federal legislation and court case decisions. The report will first present a chronology of events beginning in April 2000 and concluding on January 9, 2002. The report will also summarize the Oxford House program, structure, data, and will review issues related to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and requirements. The report will then present crime statistics for each Oxford House in King County and the house located in Edmonds (this infonnation has also been requested for locations in Pierce County but this infonnation has not been received, as of the completion of this report). Finally, the report will present an analysis of a number of legal issues. 2. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS 04/00 05/00 06/00 06/12/00 07/01/00 King County Housing Authority submitted application for 2001 CDBG capital funds. See attachment B. The request was for $20,000 to purchase a single- family house of 3000+ square feet to use as housing for persons in recovery from substance abuse. The application stated that the house would be located "somewhere in South King County" and that at least eight adults would reside in the house. City staff review of applications. Human Services Commission review of applications. Human Services Commission interviewed King County Housing Authority and Oxford House. Public Notice of Human Services Commission's preliminary recommendations and Public Hearing. Note: Oxford House was not listed in the public notice, as the project was not included in the original recommendations, due to limited funds available. . ' 07/17/00 07/21/00 08/07/00 09/05/00 09/00 06/01 06/25/01 07/13/01 08/03/01 Oxford House was included in the contingency plan. The written contingency plan was distributed at the Public Hearing. Public Hearing The Human Services Commission finalized the 2001 funding recommendations and contingency plan. A revised estimate of funds available was received from King County. The original recommendations were based on an estimated total of $488,302. On July 21, 2000 the revised estimate was $591,177. The contingency plan was used to adjust the recommendations to the amount of funds available. This included $20,000 for the Oxford House project. The Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety Council Committee reviewed the Commission's recommendations including the funding for Oxford House. The Committee approved the Commission's recommendations and forwarded them on to the full City Council for review. The City Council approved the 2001 CDBG Proposed Use of Funds, including $20,000 for an Oxford House project. The application for this project was to locate a house in South King County. When the project was approved for CDBG funding the location was yet to be determined. Project was transferred from King County Housing Authority, as the owner of the house, to Compass Center. King County contracted with Compass Center for this project. The contract included King County funds and City of Federal Way CDBG funds. The County directly administers the capital CDBG funds allocated to non-profit agencies for the City ofFedera1 Way, as the City is a member of the CDBG Consortium. Compass Center began looking for a house for this program. Compass Center telephorted City staff to inquire about the process for requesting an exception to tñe zoning code, which limits the number of unrelated adults allowed to live in a single-family home. City staff advised Compass Center to submit a written request. Compass Center submits a written request asking for a letter of determination that the proposed use for a single-family home in the Stone Brook neighborhood is permitted under the City of Federal Way's Municipal Code, Section 22.1 Definition of Family. See attachment C. City staff responded in writing to the Compass Center's request for determination that the proposed use for the single-family home is permitted under the City's definition of family. See attachment D. The City's response 2 . ' 09/19/01 09/21/01 10/05/01 10/17/01 10-11/01 11/06/01 11/30/01 12/20/01 01/02/02 states that based on acceptable documentation that Oxford House operates a residence for persons in recovery and proyides services to these disabled persons, the residential project would be considered exempt from Federal Way land use processes, procedures, and fees. The number of persons residing in the house would not be limited by the Federal Way City Code definition of family. Compass Center receives a signed State contract for funding of this project. Compass Center closes on the house purchase in Federal Way. The City receives a letter from the Compass Center inviting City staff to attend the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association meeting. See attachment E. . Representatives from the Compass Center, Oxford House, King County Housing Division, and a City planning staff member attended the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association Board meeting. Project representatives provided information about the Oxford House and addressed questions and concerns. City staff was invited by the Compass Center to attend the meeting. A City planning staff member attended the meeting to address any questions from the association regarding the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation to this program. From conversations with Compass Center staff members, it is the City's understanding that the Compass Center Executive Director had follow-up telephone conversations with the Homeowners' Association President to discuss the project. An architect applies for a City building permit on behalf of Compass Center to replace the roof, replace the deck, and remodel the family room to make an additional bedroom. Building permit is ready to issue and applicant is notified. In addition to a City building permit, the agency applied to the Homeowners Association for approval :from their design review committee. According to Compass Center representatives, no approval from the Homeowners Association has been received to date. Neighbors in Twin Lakes start contacting City Councilmembers and City staff with questions on the Oxford House. Building permit issued to architect. Twin Lakes residents attend the City Council meeting to voice numerous complaints over the location of the Oxford House- The City Council directs 3 City staff to prepare a report responding to questions raised by citizens and Council. 01/03/02 Building Official rescinds the building permit based on missing information on the original application. The applicant is notified that information on whether the home is a licensed care facility under the Building Code is required. 01107/02 City staff meets with representatives from Oxford House, Compass Center, King County Housing and Community Development to obtain information requested by the City Council for inclusion in this report. 01109/02 Electronic mail received from Ken Guza of Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) stating that the State does not license the Oxford House as a Licensed Care facility. See attachment F. 3. PROGRAM a. Activities and Daily Schedule Oxford House is an independent living situation and does not provide treatment. The majority of Oxford House residents work during the day and are home evenings and weekends. The stated goal of Oxford House is to provide a supportive, clean and sober living environment. Residents can live in an Oxford House as long as they want and as long as they follow house rules. In Washington State, the average length of stay is 13 to 15 months. There are individuals who have resided in houses for five or more years. All residents participate in the management of the house. Each house elects officers to manage the house including a president, treasurer, secretary, comptroller, and coordinator. House meetings are held each week and attendance is required. The house will have up to eight residents. Typically, about half of the residents have .cars. Parking is available for two cars in the garage and another two cars in the driveway. b. CriteriaiScreening/Background Cheëk for Residents i. Application and Screening Process Referrals to Oxford House come from a variety of sources including treatment agencies, 12 step support groups, Veterans' Administration, other agencies and word of mouth. Each applicant is required to fill out a written application. The application is forwarded to the specific house that the applicant wants to reside in. See attachment G. The residents of the house interview each applicant. During the interview, applicants are asked if they have any current legal issues pending. See attachment 4 H. It is the policy of Oxford House not to accept anyone on probation for sex offenses due to the periodic presence of house residents' children in the home. Oxford House policy encourages residents to rebuild family connections including regular visits and overnight visits of minor children. During the interview applicants are also asked about violent behavior. Those with violent behavior are screened out, as the house residents do not want to live with violent housemates. There is no formal background check. Following the interview, the house members yote on whether or not to allow the individual to join the house. It takes an 80% "yes" vote by house members for an individual to be admitted. Residents who break the house rules can be voted out by a 50% Yote. Those who relapse are immediately expelled. ii. Criteria for Selection of Residents Include: . Persons who have incomes ofless than 50% of the area median and who are exiting inpatient treatment, have completed outpatient treatment, or have been clean and/or sober for at least 30 days; . A willingness to remain clean and sober; . A willingness to participate in self-management of the house; . A willingness to pay rent in a timely manner; . A willingness to avoid disruptive behavior; and . A willingness not to tolerate violations of the "clean and sober at all times" rule in oneself or others. According to Compass Center's Management Plan for Oxford Houses, "prospective residents will have completed a treatment program and be alcohol and drug free at the time of application to a house. See attachment I. c. Supervision of Residents Oxford House is not a treatment program; it is a residence. It does not have staff members or provide direct services. When houses first start up a veteran member of another Oxford House will move into the new house to act as a mentor and get the house started. Houses are self-managed, independent, and organized to support recovery. Residents are encouraged to attend AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) or NA (Narcotics Anonymous) meetings and to seek additional treatment or counseling if needed. Residents must abide by the house rules. The primary rules are: . Any resident who relapses must be immediately expelled; . Residents who break other house rules or are disruptive can be voted out by a 50% vote by the house members; . Houses are financially self-supporting with all expenses paid by the residents; and . Houses operate democratically. 5 d. Therapy Philosophy The program does not provide therapy or direct services. Oxford House is an independent living situation. Oxford House has as its primary goal the provision of housing and rehabilitative support for the alcoholic or addict who wants to stop drinking or using and remain clean and sober. e. Oxford Houses and Similar Facilities. i. How many Oxford Houses are located in King County? The Oxford House website www.oxfordhouse.orf! states that there are approximately 90 Oxford Houses in Washington State. Of those, 21 are located in King County including locations in Kirkland, Lake Forest Park, Renton, Shoreline, and Seattle. See attachment J. In addition, Oxford House has recently received funding ITom ARCH (A Regional Coalition for Housing) and the King County Housing Opportunity Fund to locate a house in East King County and is currently exploring two potential sites in Kirkland. ii. Have other similar houses been established in Federal Way? Yes. According to Multi-Service Center staff, the Multi-Service Center operates two transitional houses for men recovering from substance abuse. One of the Multi-Service Center homes has a maximum of eight residents and the other a maximum of six. The two homes generally have four - five residents per house. The Multi-Service Center provides case management to the residents. The screening process includes a staff meeting with potential residents, extensive application, and background references and housing references. New residents are required to be clean and sober for 30 days prior to admission into a home. Residents are informed it is a case-managed program with 30% of the income used for services received. Case Managers work with residents extensively on barriers such as permanent housing, job search, focus on sobriety, and aftercare. Residents must follow all rules of the house or will be asked to leave. The goal is to function as any other house in the neighborhood. There is no on-site supervision. Case management involves announced and unannounced visits by the case manager, a screening process, and weekly meetings with each individual resident. The current Program Manager does not recall anyone being asked to leave due to neighborhood issues in the past four years. There are a number of other types of group homes located throughout Federal Way that serve a variety of populations including senior citizens, people with disabilities, and chronically mentally ill individuals. 6 4. FUNDING I CDBG a. What is the total funding for this program and where did it come from? The total funding for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the house is $501,421. Sources of funding are: State Housing Trust Fund ($276,136); King County Housing Opportunity Fund ($205,285); and the City ofFederal Way CDBG Funds ($20,000). The City's CDBG contribution to the project is four percent of the total project cost. b. Are any other South King County cities funding this project? No. The agency applied to the City of Auburn for CDBG funding, but that application was not funded. c. Was there notice required by CDBG funding? Community notification is not a condition ofHUD funding. However, the public notice requirements of the King County Consortium were met for the 2001 CDBG program. Legal notice was published when the Human Services Commission conducted the public hearing on the proposed use ofCDBG funds. The contingency plan was distributed at the public hearing. The Hurnan Services Commission and the Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety Committee considered the proposed use of the funds as an agenda item before a final recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. Commission, Council Committee and City Council meetings are open to the public. Agenda materials are available for public review of all Committee and Council meetings. Additionally, King County publishes a summary of proposed one-year use offederal funds for the following year and holds public hearings on proposed use of CDBG funds. The King County Executive submits proposed use of CDBG funds as part of the Housing and Community Development Plan, and application to HUD for the Consortium's CDBG entitlements. The Metropolitan King County Council adopts the total King County Consortiums CDBG activities, including the Pass-through Cities' and the County and Small Cities CDBG projects, for the following year. . The King County Consortium encourages housing developers tò communicate with the surrounding community when locating a housing development. No specific condition for neighborhood notification was required for the Oxford House CDBG by the City, but at the time the project was reviewed, the Human Services Commission asked how outreach to the community during site selection and ongoing operation of the site would be handled. The applicants responded that community notification would occur once a site had been selected and secured with a purchase and sale agreement. d. What was the role of King County Housing Authority? Did the City have any role in site location? The function of the King County Housing Authority on the Oxford House project was to own the property, collect lease payments and establish a reserve account, inspect the 7 house twice per year, and maintain the house as needed. These responsibilities transferred to Compass House in September 2000. The City did not have a role in the location of the site. The City was informed of progress as one of the funders of the project and was invited to the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association meeting on October 17,2001. e. Can the City withdraw the CDBG funding for this project? No. The City CDBG funds for this project were for acquisition of a property somewhere in South King County. King County executed a contract with the Compass Center for the City CDBG funds and allocated the King County funds to this project The County directly administers the capital CDBG funds allocated to non-profit agencies for the City, as the City is a member of the CDBG Consortium. The property has been purchased and the City's CDBG funds of $20,000 have been released to the applicant. See section six for additional discussion. 5. DATA a. Data regarding effectiveness of the program i. Anecdotal and quantitative The following statistics were provided by Oxford House based upon a survey of Oxford House residents. See attachment H. Statistics given by Oxford House of Washington State in 1999 1997 1998 Survey Respondents 247 323 Percentage of Residents Responding 69% 72% Number of Washington Oxford Houses 50 65 Number of Recovery Beds 436 546 Average Age 37.1 36.8 Monthly Resident Income $1,082 $1,322 Percent of Residents Employed 58% 67% Percent of Residents who are Veterans 30.7% 27.2% Length of Current Sobriety 12.6 months 17.1 months Residents Served Jail Time Previously 77% 79% Addiction - Alcohol 52% 48% Addiction - Drugs 47% 53% Average # of AAlNA Mtgs Attended 3.75 3.55 per week per individual Percentage of those attending 47.1% 44.4% counseling % Residents that attend 12 Step Mtgs No Data 92% 8 ii. Success rate No quantitative data is available on the relapse rate of Oxford residents after residents leave an Oxford House, as no tracking mechanism is in place. According to data collected at Oxford House Chapter meetings there is an 82% success rate in Washington State, compared to a 75% success rate nationwide. "Success" is defined as no relapse while living in the house. b. Crime Data i. Introduction Of the approximately 90 houses in Washington State, 21 houses are located in King County, two in Snohomish County, and eight in Pierce County. The King County houses are grouped into three chapters - Chapters 6, II, and 13. The two Snohomish County Homes have been grouped in King County's Chapter 13. The eight Pierce County Houses comprise Oxford House Chapter 10. The Federal Way Department of Public Safety made a records request for all calls for service at Oxford Houses listed in Chapters 6, II, 13, and 10. These 31 houses fall within the following law enforcement jurisdictions: King County Sheriff's Office, Pierce County Sheriff's Office/Tacoma Police Department, Seattle Police Department, Edmonds Police Department, Lake Forest Park Police Department, Kirkland Police Department, and Mount Lake Terrace Police Department. King and Pierce County houses are those residences that fall into the unincorporated areas. A "call for service" is any call made to a law enforcement agency where a service is rendered. A "call for service" mayor may not be a 911 call. In law enforcement terms, a "hit" on an address for a "call for service" simply indicates that a law enforcement service has been rendered at that address. For instance, a "hit" on an address for a "call for service" does not distinguish between instances in which a house resident is a victim and instances in which the resident is a suspect. At the time of this report, the Federal Way Department of Public Safety received responses to the "call for servicë" requests from all law enforcement jurisdictions except Mount Lake Terrace and Pierce County. The manner in which data is reported back to the Federal Way Department of Public Safety differs among law enforcement agencies. "Calls for services" are listed by the type of "call for service;" statistics are for the past three years. Where an address has had more than one "call for service," it is so noted. Where an address did not have a "hit" it is also noted. 9 ii. Chart (These are Incidents Entered ~ They May Not Include All 911 Calls) Calls for Calls for Calls for Seattle P.D. Houses Location Service Service Service 1999 2000 2001 Ballard Oxford House (Men's) 2843 NW 69w I-Accident I-Prop Dam No Hits Seattle, WA 98117 Crown Hill Oxford House 8053 11m Ave. W, No Hits I-Theft No Hits (Men's) Seattle, WA 98117 Greenlake Oxford House (Men's) 8231 Wallingford No Hits No Hits No Hits North, Seattle, W A 98103 Greenwood Oxford House 156 NW 83'" St. No Hits No Hits I-Auto Theft (Men's) Seattle, WA 98117 Licton Springs Oxford House 744 North 104"' St. I-Theft Bike No Hits I-Dist Family (Women's) Seattle, WA 98133 North Gate Oxford House 10036 Interlake Ave. No Hits No Hits No Hits (Women's) N. Seattle, WA 98113 Oaktree Oxford House (Men's) 754 North 100 St. I-Sex No Hits No Hits Seattle, WA 98133 Offense Simmons Oxford House 19261 Occidental No Hits No Hits No Hits (Women's) Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98148 Brockman Oxford (Men's) 1508 NE Brockman Not Open Not Open Opened 11101 PI. No Hits Seattle, WA Lake City Oxford House (Men's) 13727350' AYe. NE No Hits No Hits No Hits Seattle, WA 98125 Levy Oxford House (Men's) 12527 20w Ave NE No Hits No Hits I-Mental Seattle, WA 98125 l-Theft-Bldg TOTALS -11 HOUSES (8 Men's & 3 Women's) 3 Hits! 2 Hits! 4 Hits! 8 No Hits 9 No Hits 8 No Hits 10 King County Houses Location Calls for Calls for Calls for Service Service Service 1999 2000 2001 Bridal Trails Oxford House 7517142" NE Not Open Not Open Opened 11101 (Men's) Kirkland, W A 98033 No Hits Kingsgate Oxford House 130l9NE 128 PI. Not Open Opened 08/00 I-Larceny (Men's) Kirkland, WA 98034 I-Fireann I-Fire Inv. Illegal Accid Discharge I-Stalking Casckade Oxford House 13018 SE 171 PI. I-DUI No Hits I-Info (Women's) Renton, WA 98058 I-Civil Prob Kirkland Oxford House 12503 NE 134 PI. I-Burglary No Hits 3-Mental (Men's) Kirkland, W A 98034 2-DOC 2-Abandoned Contact Vehicle Juanita Oxford House 8420 NE 13~PI. l-Ciyil Prob I-Person Lost No Hits (Men's) Kirkland, W A 98034 1-91 I Hang- Indecent! up Nuisance I-Larceny Snoking Oxford House 13100NE 143'. St. I-Traffic No Hits No Hits (Men's) Kirkland, WA 98034 Stop l-Ciyil Prob I-Larceny Furlong Oxford House 18907 II AveNE Not Open Not Open Opened 09/01 (Men's) Shoreline, WA 98155 Check Nunziato Oxford House 1610N 199 St Not Open Not Open Opened 09/01 (Women's) Shoreline, WA 98133 No Hits TOTALS - 8 HOUSES (6 Men's & 2 Women's) 10 Hits! 2 Hits! 11 Hits! 4 No Hits 6NoHits 4NoHits 11 Edmonds P.D. Houses Location Calls for Service 2001 Ballinger Oxford House (Women's) 2280776 AYe. W. Edmonds, W A 98043 Not Open Not Open Opened 07/01 No Hits TOTALS -1 HOUSE (Women's) Not Open Not Open 1 No Hit Lake Forest ParkP.D. Location Calls for Calls for Calls for Houses Service Service Service 1999 2000 2001 Lake Forest Park Oxford 20143 47th Ave NE No Hits 2-Missing I-Harrassment House (Women's) Lake Forest Park, WA Person 2-ViolOfCt 98155 Order I-Citzen Contact TOTALS -1 HOUSE (Women's) Not Hits 2 Hits 4 Hits Mount Lake Terrace P.D. Houses Location Calls for Service 2001 Terrace Oxford House (Men's) 5803 226 PI. SW Seattle, WA 98133 No Response TOTALS -1 HOUSE (Men's) No Response 12 Kirkland P.D. Houses Location Calls for Calls for Calls for Service Service Service 1999 2000 2001 Houghton Oxford House 5915 1060' AYe. SE Not Reported Not Reported I-Info-drug use (Men's) Kirkland, WA 98033 I-Dom Dispute I-Pos Suicide Attempt I-Missing Person TOTALS-l HOUSE (Men's) Not Reported Not Reported 4 Hits Pierce County Houses Location Calls for I Calls for I Calls for Service Service Service 1999 2000 2001 Ainsworth Oxford 8816 Ainsworth AYe. No Response House (Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444 Alder Oxford House 7240 S. Alder St. No Response (Men's) Tacoma, W A 98409 Cheney Oxford House 1015 S. Huson St. No Response (Men's) Tacoma, W A 98405 Ruston View Oxford 4720 North Huson St. No Response House (Women's) Tacoma, WA 98047 Fern Hill Oxford House 1601 S.90mSt. No Response (Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444 South End Oxford House 1517S.57mSt. No Response (Men's) Tacoma, WA 98408 Puyallup Oxford House 12421 136 Ave. E No Response (Men's) Puyallup, WA 98375 Tacoma Narrows Oxford 615 N. Jackson AYe. No Response House (Men's) Tacoma, WA 98406 TOTALS - 8 HOUSES (5 Men's & 3 Women's) No Response 13 ., Pierce County Houses Location Calls for Calls for Calls for Service Service Service 1999 2000 2001 Ainsworth Oxford House 8816 Ainsworth Ave. Not Reported I-Unknown I-Medical Aid (Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444 Trouble I-Fire I-ACB Info I-Runaway I-Runaway Pick- up 1- Domestic Alder Oxford House 7240 S. Alder St. Not Reported I-Dispute- I-Accident Hit & (Men's) Tacoma, W A 98409 Neighbor Run I-Medical Aid I-Noise Complaint I-Theft Cheney Oxford House 1015 S. Huson St. Not Reported I-Accident Hit & 1-911 Hang-up (Men's) Tacoma, WA 98405 Run I-Info Contact Ruston View Oxford 4720 North Huson St. Not Reported 1- Assault - I-Fight House (Women's) Tacoma, W A 98047 Aggravated I-Violation of 0 I-Theft Order I-Threats I-Trouble w/customer I-Unwanted Person Fern Hill Oxford House 1601 S.90IhSt. Not Reported I-Citizen Assist I-Overdose (Women's) Tacoma, W A 98444 I-Medical Aid I-Prowler I-Theft I-Shots Fired 2-Theft-Vehicle I-Suspicious Prowl Vehicle South End Oxford House 1517S.57IhSt. Not Reported I-Sus Vehicle I-Assault Non (Men's) Tacoma, W A 98408 Aggravated I-Loud Party 3-Medical Aid I-Trouble wlcustomer I-Unwanted Person 2-Welfare Check Puyallup Oxford House 12421 I 36th Ave. E Not Reported 5-Medical Aid I-Medical Aid (Men's) Puyallup, WA 98375 I-Agency Assist I-Simple Assault I-Theft - Vehicle Prowl Tacoma Nancows Oxford 615 N. Jackson Ave. Not Reported I-Medical Aid 1-911 Hang-up House (Men's) Tacoma, W A 98406 I-Suicide I-Burglary Attempt I-Investigative Contact I-Medical Aid I-Suspicious Vehicle I-Theft TOTALS - 8 HOUSES (S Men's & 3 Women's) Not Reported 26 Hits 32 Hits Multi-Service Center Location Calls for Calls for Calls for Transitional Houses in Service Service Service Federal Way 1999 2000 2001 Transitional House I-Arson I-Vol Commit No Hits I-Theft Transitional House No Hits I-Found No Hits Property I-Welfare Check I-Civil Issue I-Warrant TOTALS 2 HOUSES 2 Hits! 5 Hits 2 No Hits 1 No Hit 6. LEGAL ISSUES I QUESTION AND SHORT ANSWER At the January 2, 2002 City Council meeting, City Councilmembers and several citizens raised legal questions. Subsequent to the Council meeting, other citizens raised additional legal questions via electronic mail messages to individual City Council members. This section discusses all of those legal questions in a question and short answer format. A longer legal analysis is attached as attachment A for your information. a. What effect does the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA) of 1988 haye on the Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house? Short answer: The FHAA invalidates any law of a State or political subdivision that purports to require or permit any discriminatory housing practice with respect to persons with disabilities or handicaps, or on account of familial status. The Act broadly derIDes "handicap" to include: (I) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) a record of having such an impairment; or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment. 42 V.S.C. § 3602(h). The definition does not include the "current, illegal use of or addition to a controlled substance,"or"persons who have been convicted of the illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance." Because of the language of the Act, añd its parallels with the federal Rehabilitation Act, courts have construed this definition to include persons recovering from drug and/or alcohol addiction. "Discrimination" includes the refusal to make reasonable accommodation from otherwise neutrally applicable code provisions, when the accommodation is necessary to afford disabled or handicapped persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Taken together, the Act's provisions mean that, in certain circumstances, the City might be required to grant a "reasonable accommodation" by not enforcing the cap on unrelated persons living in a single dwelling, if necessary to afford handicapped persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. That is exactly what occurred when City staff issued the August 3, 2001, letter informing Compass 14 Center that the City would not apply the 5-person limitation on unrelated persons in the Code's definition of "family." b. What effect does the Washington Housing Policy Act have on the Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house? Short answer: If the recent decision of Division III of the Washington Court of Appeals in Sunderlandv. City of Pasco, 107 Wn.App. 109,26 P.3d 955 (Div. III 2001) is applied statewide, the Washington Housing Policy Act prevents a city from requiring a provider of group housing for disabled or handicapped persons to undergo a special or conditional use permit process before being allowed to occupy a single-family house, if the city permits a "family" to obtain immediate occupancy of a residential structure without such a permit. c. May the City enforce the Twin Lakes Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("CC&Rs")? Short answer: No. Covenants are essentially contracts between private parties and may only be enforced by the parties to or beneficiaries of the contract. The City is neither a party to the CC&Rs nor an owoer of property benefited by them. Therefore, the City cannot enforce the CC&Rs. d. If the City may not enforce the Twin Lakes CC&Rs, may the City pay the costs of the homeowners' litigation to enforce them? Short answer: No. The City's payment oflitigation costs of private parties seeking to enforce private CC&Rs would be an unconstitutional gift of public funds or constitute an unlawful lending of credit e. Is the City prohibited by the CC&Rs from approving uses that might violate the CC&Rs? Short answer: No. The CC&Rs are not binding on the City in its land use decisions. f. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a home occupation land use approval prior to occupying the Twi.!l Lakes house? Sport answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not fit the definition of home occupation under the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). Therefore, no home occupation land use approval may be required. g. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a business license prior to occupying the Twin Lakes house? Short answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not fit the definition of business under the FWCC. 15 h. May the City withdraw or modify its decision to provide Community Deyelopment Block Grant funding to the Compass Center? Short answer: No. The money has already been disbursed and the contract does not provide for means by which money may be recovered under these circumstances. In addition, withdrawal of funding in response to neighborhood opposition to housing for disabled would likely be held to be discrimination in yiolation of the FHAA. i. Is the City financially liable for the actiyity of the Twin Lakes house residents? Short answer: No. The City would not be liable, because it is protected from suit for its land use permitting actions by the public duty doctrine. j. If the City may not take any action concerning the Oxford House's proposal to occupy the Twin Lakes house, what options (if any) does the City Council have with respect to any future Oxford House or other group home applications? Short answer: The City Council may consider adoption of code amendments to regulate future group housing applications, such as a formal process by which to evaluate requests for reasonable accommodation, or a permit process for certain types of group homes. Any amendments, however, must be carefully tailored to avoid discrimination in violation of the FHAA or the WHP A. 7. SUMMARY In summary, City staff have not identified a legal basis to reverse the August 3, decision to grant Oxford House a reasonable accommodation to permit the Twin Lakes location of an Oxford House. We do not offer any opinion as to the basis of a potential challenge by the Twin Lakes Homeowners Association based on the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. However, there are several actions the Council might request of Compass Center and Oxford House to enable the facility to function well within the community and to resolve any problems or issues which might arise. Actions the Council might consider are: I. Community Informational Meetings - The Council could request that Compass Center and Oxford House sponsor one or morë information meetings in the community about Oxford House and to foster communication between Oxford House residents and the Twin Lakes community. 2. Establish a Neighborhood Advisory Council- It is staff's understanding that Compass Center has established, in other similar facilities, a Neighborhood Advisory Council. This advisory council could meet monthly to further ensure good communication between the House and the community and provide a forum to resolve any problems or issues that may arise. 3. Reporting Procedures - The Council could request that the Oxford House provide a monthly report to the Council and the Twin Lakes Homeowners Association on the status 16 of the House. This report might summarize activities of the House, any management issues and any incidents that might have occurred. 4- Community Service - The Council might request that Oxford House residents agree to contribute a certain amount of community service time each month to the Twin Lakes community- 5. Code AInendments - The Council could direct City staff to prepare Code AInendments to provide better public notification for consideration of any similar future applications for group homes. It is acknowledged that with the exception of number five, as listed above, the Council cannot require these actions. However, they are actions the Council might request to enable greater communication and understanding between the Oxford House and the Twin Lakes community and to ensure continued monitoring of Oxford House both by the City and the Twin Lakes community. K:(LA W)loxford houseldocumentslreport 1-14-02 17 LEGAL ISSUES/ANALYSIS 1. What effect does the Federal Fair Housing AInendments Act of 1988 have on the Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house? . 2- What effect does the Washington Housing Policy Act have on the Oxford House's request to occupy the Twin Lakes house? 3. May the City enforce the Twin Lakes Coyenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("CC&Rs")? 4. If the City may not enforce the Twin Lakes CC&Rs, may the City pay the costs of the homeowners' litigation to enforce them? 5. Is the City prohibited by the CC&Rs from approying uses that might yiolate the CC&Rs? 6. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a home occupation land use approval prior to occupying the Twin Lakes house? 7. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a business license prior to occupying the Twin Lakes house? 8. May the City withdraw or modify its decision to provide Community Development Block Grant funding to the Compass Center? 9. Is the Compass Center, Oxford House, or the City financially liable for the activity of the Twin Lakes house residents? 10. If the City may not take any action concerning the Oxford House's proposal to occupy the Twin Lakes house, what options (if any) does the City Council have? These questions are discussed seriatim below. 1. What effect does the Federal Fair Housin!! Amendments Act of 1988 ("FHAA") have on the Oxford House's request to occupv the Twin Lakes house? Short answer: The FHAA invalidates any law of a State or political subdivision that purports to require or permit any discriminatory housing practice with respect to handicapped persons, or on account of familial status. The definition of "handicapped" includes persons recovering from drug and/or alcohol addiction. "Discrimination" includes the refusal to make reasonable accommodation from otherwise neutrally applicable code provisions, when the accommodation is necessary to afford disabled or handicapped persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Taken together, these provisions mean that, in certain circumstances, the FHAA requires the City to grant a "reasonable accommodation" by not enforcing the land use code's cap on the number of unrelated persons liying together, if necessary to afford handicapped persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. This is exactly what the City did when staff issued the August 3, 2001 letter informing Compass Center that the City would not apply the 5 unrelated person limit in the Code's definition of "family" to bar Oxford House from using the Twin Lakes House. Analvsis: Introduction When the federal Fair Housing Act is mentioned, most people think first about well-publicized cases from the civil rights era in which banks and landlords were sued for racially discriminatory rental and lending policies. Few realize that the Fair Housing Act significantly limits municipal zoning power with respect to single-family and other residential neighborhoods. As originally adopted in 1968, the Fair Housing Act prohibited discrimination against persons in the terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin. "Sex" was added as a protected class in 1974. As originally adopted, the Act also invalidated "any law of a State, a political subdivision, or any other such jurisdiction that purports to require or permit any action that would be a discriminatory housing practice under the Act." 42 U.S.C. § 3615. In 1985, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in City ofCleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 LEd.2d 313 (1985). The case involved the denial of a use permit to operate a group home for mentally retarded adults. The denial was challenged on constitutional grounds; the Center alleged that it violated the Equal Protection Clause because it treated mentally handicapped persons wishing to live in a residential neighborhood differently than others who might wish to live in the same location. Therefore, the Center argued, the handicapped were a "quasi-suspect" class, which required the application of heightened scrutiny of the validity ofthe City's governmental interest in treating the handicapped differently. The United States Supreme Court disagreed that the handicapped were a "quasi- suspect" class and declined to subject the City's decision to heightened scrutiny. The Court did conclude, howeyer, that the City's denial nevertheless violated the Equal Protection clause because the City could not point to anything in the record that provided a rational basis for requiring a special use permit for a home for the mentally handicapped when it did not also require such a permit for other types of group homes in the same residential zone. The Court noted that the fact the City Council had been concerned with the "negative attitudes, or fear," of the majority of property owners in the neighborhood was not sufficient justification for the permit denial: But mere negatiye attitudes, or fear, unsubstantiated by factors which are properly cognizable in a zoning proceeding, are not permissible bases for treating a home for the mentally retarded differently from apartment houses, multiple dwellings, and the like. 2 473 U.S. at 448. "The short of it," the Court noted, was that "requiring the permit in this case appears to us to rest on an irrational prejudice against the mentally retarded. . . ." ¡d. at 450. The Court therefore invalidated the ordinance requiring the special permit. Although the group homeowner won the case, the Court's refusal to extend the protection of its heightened scrutiny in Equal Protection cases to the handicapped spurred renewed lobbying in Congress resulting in the 1988 Fair Housing AInendments Act. Note, The Fair Housing Act, Oxford House, and the Limits of Local Control Over the Regulation of Group Homes for Recovering Addicts, 36 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1467, 1472-73 (Douglas E- Miller 1995), The Fair Housing AInendments Act of 1988 The Act added familial status to the list of classes protected under the Act. 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a) - (e). It also expressly made it unlawful to "discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of that buyer or renter or a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling." 42 U.s.C § 3604(f). The Act broadly defined "handicap" to include: (I) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities; (2) a record of having such an impairment; or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment. 42 U.S.C. § 3602(h)- The definition does not include the "current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance," or "persons who have been convicted of the illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance." It appears established, howeyer, that the definition does include persons recovering ftom drug and/or alcohol addicition. The definition of "handicap" is construed as including recovering alcoholics and drug addicts because of the FHAA's legislative history, and because the courts construe the FHAA in parallel with the Rehabilitation Act (which expressly includes recovering alcoholics and drug addicts within its definition of disabled.) This has prompted at least one court to observe that "it is well established that individuals recovering ftom drug or alcohol addiction are handicapped under the Act. Corporation of the Episcopal Church in Utah v. West Valley City, 119 F.Supp.2d 1215 (D. Utah 2000).\ Because the Act as adopted in 1968 invalidated any law that purported to require or permit any act that would be discriminatory, the 1988 amendments' addition of "handicapped" to the list of protected classes made it possible for housing adyocates to argue that the FHAA potentially inyalidated any municipal law that discriminated, or made unayailable or denied a dwelling to any person because of a handicap. As several commentators have noted, the FHAA and its legislative I However, a federal district court in Washington reiected a claim that residents "impaired by drug or alcohol dependency" were handicapped, based on the FHAA's exclusion of current substance abusers tram the definition of "handicap." Children's Alliance v. City of Bellevue, 950 F.Supp. 1491, 1495, n.5 (W.O. Wash. 1997) (italics in original). 3 history indicate that Congress intended that municipal land use as well as health and safety regulations comply with its provisions.2 In another new twist, the 1988 FHAA also defined "discrimination" to include "a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling." 42 U.S.c. § 3604(f)(3)(B). Exemptions Notably, the Act does exempt at least two types of municipal regulations. First, it exempts "any reasonable local, State, or Federal restrictions regarding the maximum number of occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling." 42 U.s.C. § 3607(b )(1). This exemption, however, protects only traditional building code- type occupancy limitations based on square footage, number of bedrooms, etc., and does not protect definitions of "family" that limit the number of unrelated persons who may live together while placing no limit on the number of related persons. City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., 514 U.S. 725, 115 S.Ct. 1776, 131 LEd.2d 801 (1995). Second, the Act states that it does not require "that a dwelling be made available to an individual whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would result in a substantial physical damage to the property of others.") In addition, the anti-discrimination proyisions do not extend to persons who claim to be disabled solely on the basis of having been adjudicated a juvenile delinquent, haying a criminal record, or being a sex offender (although such indiyiduals may claim to be disabled, and therefore protected, as a result of other mental or physical impairments). 4 How a City May be Sued Under the FHAA Since its adoption, courts haye giyen the Act broad application, and haye required "a generous construction. .in order to carry out a policy that Congress considered to be of the highest priority." United States v. Columbus Country Club, 915 F.2d 877,883 (3rd Cir. 1990). Courts haye determined that a city may be shown to have violated the Act in three ways: 2 Gathe, Group Homes: Local Control and Regulation Versus Federal and State Fair Housing Laws at 2- 3 (Washington State Bar Association 1997); 36 Wm & Mary L. Rev. at 1474, esp. n.48; 3 Zoning and Planning Law Handbook, § 3.02[2], p. 87-88 (1999) ("there is no question these prohibitions apply to state and local governmental actions or inactions in the exercise of their zoning powers."). , Determining whether someone presents a direct threat must be made on an individualized basis. It cannot be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature ora disability. Joint Statement of the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Group Homes, Local Land Use, and the Fair Housing Act, at 2 (1999); see also Children's Alliance v. Bellevue, 950 F.Supp. 1491, 1499 (W.D. Wash. 1997). 4 Joint Statement of the Department of Justice and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Group Homes, Local Land Use, and the Fair Housing Act, at I (1999). 4 I. If the city intentionally discriminates in the adoption or enforcement of an ordinance or regulation; 2. If the city adopts or enforces an ordinance that has a disparate impact on the handicapped; or 3. If the city fails to make a reasonable accommodation when necessary to afford handicapped persons reasonable access to a dwelling. See Burney and Wiener, Group Homes: The Struggle to Determine the Boundaries of the Fair Housing Amendments Act, 41 Municipal Lawyer No.3 at 10 (May/June 2000). With respect to the first category, discriminatory intent, or "differential treatment," is most plainly described as "intentional discrimination against handicapped persons, based solely on the handicap." Id. While some federal courts have analyzed up to five separate factors to determine whether discriminatory intent exists,S at least one Washington federal court has concluded that a plaintiff alleging intentional discrimination need show only that "the defendant expressly treats members of a protected group differently than others who are similarly situated." Children's Alliance v. Bel/evue, 905 F. Supp, At 1495. As Judge Zilly noted, "differential treatment on the face of an ordinance demonstrates an intent to discriminate; additional eyidence of discriminatory animus is not required." Id. In a decision decided just two days after Judge Zilly's decision in Children's Alliance, however, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that, in order to establish a disparate treatment claim, the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by proving four factors. Gamble v. City of Escondido, 104 F.3d 300, 305 (9th Cir. 1997). The burden then shifts to the defendant to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its action. If it does so, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of evidence that the reason asserted by the defendant is mere pretext. In so doing, the Court held, the plaintiff s "proof of discriminatory motive is crucial to a disparate treatment claim." Gamble, 104 F.3d at 305. When a city articulates a legitimate, nondiscriminatory basis for its actions, there has been disagreement as to whether a city may simply point to ;my rational, nondiscriminatory basis for its actions, or whether the potential universe of rationales is more limited. In Children's Alliance v. Bel/evue, a Washington federal district court judge noted that while the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals employed the same "rational basis" standard used in evaluated claims under the Equal Protection Act, the district would instead follow the approach used by the S The five factors are: discriminatory impact; the historical background of the decision; the sequence of events leading up to the challenged decision; departures !Tom the normal procedural sequence; and departures !Tom normal substantive criteria. Id., citing Stewart B. McKinney Foundation, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning Comm'n of Fairfield, 790 F.Supp. 1197, 121 I (D. Conn. 1992). 5 Sixth and Tenth Circuit Courts of Appeals, in which a city could rebut a showing of facial discrimination only by showing either "(I) that the ordinance benefits the protected class or (2) that it responds to legitimate safety concerns raised by the individuals affected, rather than being based on stereotypes." Children's Alliance, 950 F.Supp. at 1498. This standard appears too strict, in light of the fact that Gamble, decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals two days after Children's Alliance, held that concern for the character of a single-family neighborhood was a legitimate and nondiscriminatory reason sufficient to rebut a showing of differential treatment / intentional discrimination. Although the issue as fÌamed in Children's Alliance has yet to be expressly decided by the Ninth Circuit, Gamble appears to rule out such an argument. Under the second category of actions, even if a particular regulation does not treat handicapped persons differently and therefore, no intentional discrimination has occurred, a plaintiff may still demonstrate a violation of the FHAA if the plaintiff demonstrates that a regulation has a "disparate impact" on the handicapped. To do so, the plaintiff must establish "at least that the defendant's actions had a discriminatory effect." Gamble, 104 F.3d at 306. This requires: "(1) the occurrence of certain outwardly neutral practices, and (2) a significantly adverse or disproportionate impact on persons of a particular type produced by the defendant's facially neutral acts or practices." Id. This typically requires statistical or other evidence to establish the disparate impact; "raising an inference of discriminatory impact is insufficient." Id. Further, a plaintiff may not rely on a comparison between the disabled and non-disabled single families. The relevant comparison group is other groups of similar sizes living together. "Otherwise, all that has been demonstrated is a discriminatory effect on group living." Id. Finally, even if a regulation does not involve differential treatment of the handicapped, nor has a differential impact, the FHAA may still be violated "when a municipality refuses to make reasonable accommodations in its rules when such accommodations may be necessary to afford handicapped persons equal opportunity for housing." Turning Point, Inc. v. City of Caldwell, 74 F.3d 941, 945 (9th Cir. 1996). In general, a "reasonable accommodation" is defined as "one which would not impose an undue hardship or burden upon the entity making the accommodation. . .and would not undermine the basic purpose which the requirement seeks to achieve." United States v. Village of Marshall, 787 F.Supp. 872,878 (W.D. Wisc- 1991).6 Whether a reasonable accommodation is required "will vary depending on the facts of a giyen case." [d. There is a circuit split on the question of which party bears the burden of showing if an accommodation is reasonable. Most circuits place the burden with the plaintiff, but the Third Circuit 6 One citizen cited Marshall as authority for the proposition that no accommodation need be provided in the case ofthe Twin Lakes Oxford House, because such an accommodation would impose an undue burden upon "the residents of Twin Lakes." Letter to City Council from Dave McKenzie, delivered January 2, 2002, at 2. The key inquiry, however, is whether the accommodation would place an undue burden on "the entitv making the accommodation," which in this case would be the City - which granted an accommodation from its code's definition of "family" - not the Twin Lakes neighborhood. The citation to Marshall, 787 F. Supp. at 878 (emphasis added). 6 and at least one district court in the loth Circuit haye concluded that the responsibility to initiate and make the accommodation rests with the city. Episcopal Church v. West Valley. 119 F.Supp.2d at 122], n.], and at 1222, citing Hovsons v. Township of Brick, 89 F.3d 1096 (3rd Cir. 1996). In determining whether the reasonableness requirement has been met, a court may consider a number of factors: The extent to which the accommodation would undermine the legitimate purposes and effects of existing zoning regulations and the benefits that the accommodation would provide to the handicapped. It may also consider whether alternatiyes exist to accomplish the benefits more efficiently. And in measuring the effects of an accommodation, the court may look not only to its functional and administrative aspects, but also to its costs. "Reasonable accommodations" do not require accommodations which impose undue financial and administrative burdens, or changes, adjustments, or modifications to existing programs that would be substantial, or that would constitute fundamental alterations in the nature of the program. Bryant Woods Inn, Inc. v. Howard County, 124 F.3d 597, 604 (4th Cir. 1997). As summed up by federal regulators: Not all requested modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. If a requested modification imposes an undue financial or administrative burden on a local government, or if a modification creates a fundamental alteration in a local government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation. Joint Statement ofDOJ and HUD at 1 (attached). The Joint Statement goes on to provide a comparison of circumstances the federal agencies belieye would and would not require a reasonable accommodation. For example, a group home for four mentally retarded adults which sought a reasonable accommodation ITom a code definition of family that prohibited four or more unrelated persons ITom living together would be entitled to such an accommodation, given that the group home would likely be able to show that it will haye no more impact on parking, traffic, noise, utility use, and other typical concerns of zoning than a "family," and therefore, there would be no undue burden or expense for the local government nor would the single-family character of the neighborhood be fundamentally altered. Id. at 3. This situation is in stark contrast, however, with that of a fifty-bed nursing home attempting to locate in a single-family neighborhood: 7 [Tills] would not ordinarily be considered an appropriate use in a single- family neighborhood, for obvious reasons haying nothing to do with the disabilities of its residents. Such a facility might or might not impose significant burdens and expense on the community, but it would likely create a fundamental change in the single-family character of the neighborhood. On the other hand, a nursing home might not create a "fundamental change" in a neighborhood zoned for multi-family housing. The scope and magnitude of the modification requested, and the features of the surrounding neighborhood are among the factors that will be taken into account in determining whether a requested accommodation is reasonable. ¡d. The Municipal Research and Services Center has not issued any comprehensive opinion on the subject. In 1999, it did issue a brief opinion, in which it noted that whether a reasonable accommodation is required is a fact specific inquiry, and that whether a home with 7, 8, 12 or 15 residents must be allowed will depend on the circumstances. See Memorandum to Edith Duttlinger, Senior Planner for the City of Mountlake Terrace. More illuminating are decisions of the federal courts themselyes. In Turning Point v. City of Caldwell, the Ninth Circuit upheld a finding that the City of Caldwell's grant of an accommodation fÌom its 12 unrelated person-maximum applicable to boarding houses in a commercial neighborhood, by increasing the maximum fÌom 12 to 15, was not reasonable, where evidence showed that under the city's building code, the building could have accommodated 25 persons. (Turning Point operated a homeless shelter out of an existing single-family house in a commercial zone, in which seventy-five percent of the residents were handicapped). The building official concluded that, with appropriate ceiling height modifications, the house could reasonably accommodate 25 individuals; Turning Point sought 40, arguing that any lower number would pose a severe financial burden for it and force it to close the shelter. At the City Council meeting, one Council member stated that although the letter of the law would dictate that 25 persons was a reasonable figure, the spirit of the law would indicate a much lower number. He proposed 15, and a majority of the Council agreed. Turning Point sued, and the trial court reinstated the 25-person maximum. The trial court noted that the l5-person limitation was not calculated according to any uniform code or zoning ordinance, was not necessary to preserve the character of a single-family residential zone, while at the same time, the 15- person limit "was a seyere financial burden. . .that would eventually force it to close" the shelter. 74 F.3d at 943-44. For these reasons, the court concluded that Caldwell had failed to make a reasonable accommodation. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit agreed. It also invalidated a condition requiring annual review of the Special Use Permit conditions, noting that the contingencies to which the 8 conditions were directed could be controlled under the ordinary law of nuisance and the city's power to abate them. !d. at 945. In the Children's Alliance case, the district court invalidated the City of Bellevue's entire regulation governing group homes, including its definition of "family" that limited residency to no more than 6 unrelated persons- The court. noted that the City had not offered any evidence to justifY treating homes with youth and handicapped residents differently from dwellings comprised of individuals related by blood. 950 F.Supp. at 1499. The court specifically rejected eyidence offered by the City Attorney concerning the eyidence of crime committed by individuals with a prior criminal record who would reside in the youth homes. The Court noted that the city had offered no evidence showing that the residents of the group homes were more dangerous than if they lived with their relatives, and therefore concluded that the City's "public safety rationale does not stand up under scrutiny - . , ." ld. On the other hand, two courts haye upheld caps on the number of unrelated persons who may live together. In Bryant Woods, the Fourth Circuit upheld the denial of a conditional use permit to a homeowner who rented to Alzheimer's sufferers. 124 F.3d 597. The County's code permitted up to 8 unrelated persons as a matter of right, and the owner sought approval to increase this to 15 persons. ld- at 599. The Court noted that the record indicated that although the group home residents did not drive, they received frequent visitors and there was eyidence that eyen with 8 residents the home generated parking spillover onto nearby streets. ld. at 604. While recognizing that some minimum size might be essential for a group home to be fmancially viable, or to provide a therapeutically valuable environment, the homeowner presented no eyidence that the increase from 8 to 15 would make a difference. ld. at 605. Further, the record showed that there were 30 group homes in the County with 8 or fewer residents. Taken together, the Court ruled, the eyidence demonstrated only that the owner's for- profit corporation would financially benefit, and this advantage was not required by the FHAA- !d. Likewise, in Oxford House-C v. City ofSt. Louis,1 the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the City of St. Louis' eight-person limitation on the number of unrelated persons who could liye together in a group home under the definition of "family." The Court noted that the City's ordinance did not discriminate against the handicapped because the code allowed only three unrelated persons to live together but allowed up to eight unrelated handicapped residents if in a group home. 77 F.3d at 251-52. And, because the Eighth Circuit utilizes the less strict "rational basis" standard ofreyiew, the Court ruled that the City needed only to articulate a "rational basis" for the 8-person group home maximum. Noting that the City had a legitimate interest in decreasing congestion, traffic, and noise in residential areas, the Court held that the City was not required "to assert a specific reason for choosing eight as the cut-off point, rather than ten or twelve. Every J 77 F.3d 249 (8'" Cir. 1996). 9 line drawn by a legislature leaves some out that might well haye been included." !d. Recently, other courts haye upheld six and eight-person limits, respectiyely- Keys Youth Services, Inc. v. City ofOlathe, 248 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2001); Frazier v. City of Grand Ledge, 135 F.Supp.2d 845 (W.D. Mich. 2001). In Olathe, the trial court upheld the City's denial of a special use permit to increase the number of residents in a home for troubled juveniles ftom the eight-person maximum for group homes to ten- The City based its denial on eyidence in the record that the youths that would reside in the home were classified as Level V, meaning that they are typically antisocial and aggressive, engaging in assaults, batteries, thefts, and yandalism. 248 F.3d at 1274. Evidence was presented regarding an escape of youths ftom another, similar home, and who engaged in a crime spree including setting a car on fire, burglarizing cars, defecating on a car, shoplifting, and vandalizing, ¡d. The Court held that the applicant had failed to proyide any evidence of economic necessity for the increase ftom 8 to 10 residents and, even if it had, the requested accommodation was not reasonable in light of the City's legitimate public safety concerns. In Frazier, the court found that the City of Grand Ledge did not yiolate the FHAA when it refused to increase the maximum for adult foster care centers ftom 6 to 12. The court noted that the applicant had failed to expressly request a reasonable accommodation, and therefore the City could not be liable for not having granted one. Even if an accommodation had been requested, however, the Court expressed skepticism that the applicant could demonstrate a "necessity" for the accommodation, noting that the City's zoning ordinance allowed more than 6 residents in multi-family zoned areas. 135 F.Supp.2d at 856. The Federal Way City Code The Federal Way City Code does not expressly treat the handicapped differently based solely on their handicapped status, and therefore would not give rise to a claim for "differential treatment." Based on the Ninth Circuit's decision in Gamble, the requisite groups for comparison are other, non-handicapped groups. See, e.g., Gamble, 104 F-3d at 305 (court compares treatment of Gamble's application to the treatment of apartment complex, a mobile home park, and a multistory church); see also, Episcopal Church v. West Valley City, 119 F_Supp.2d at 1220. The definition of "family" in FWCC 22-1 does not distinguish between the handicapped and non-handicapped; the definition merely limits a "family" to no more than 5 unrelated persons. Likewise, the Code's definition of Type II Group Homes are focused on the non-handicapped or those persons who pose a direct threat to public health or safety and therefore are not protected by the Act. Thus, the Code itself does not yiolate the FHAA. 10 Likewise, no eyidence, statistical or otherwise, has been presented that Federal Way's Code has a disparate impact on the handicapped. Consequently, there is no basis for an FHAA claim on the basis of disparate impact. As discussed above, howeyer, an applicant may request a "reasonable accommodation" from otherwise neutral, nondiscriminatory code provisions, where necessary to afford handicapped persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing. Compass Center requested such an accommodation in its July 13, 2001 letter, for the purpose of providing the supportiye group recoyery environment under the Oxford House model. Oxford Houses have previously claimed that at least 8 and sometimes 12 residents are needed for the houses to be financially and therapeutically yiable.8 City staff reyiewed the request, and responded that "based on acceptable documentation that Oxford House operates a residence for persons in recovery and proyides services to these disabled persons, the residential project would be considered exempt ITom Federal Way land use processes, procedures, and fees. The number of persons residing in the house would not be limited by the FWCC definition offamily".see attchment C to report. This is exactly the type of response required under the FHAA. While some citizens commenting haye raised the number of police calls for service as a concern, there is no evidence to date showing that Oxford House residents are more dangerous than other unrelated persons liying in a single-family zone, or than if recovering alcoholics or drug addicts were living with relatives in a "family". See Children's Alliance, 950 F.Supp. at 1499 (rejecting Bellevue City Attorney's declaring reporting crime statistics). As the Court noted in West Valley, the "reasonable accommodation" process is intended to be "an interactive process that requires participation by both parties." West Valley, 119 F.Supp,2d at 1222. This is what occurred when City staff reviewed and responded to the Compass Center's request for a "reasonable accommodation." 2. What effect does the Washinl!ton Housinl! Policy Act haye on the Oxford House's request to OCCUDY the Twin Lakes house? Short answer: Ifthe recent decision of Division III of the Washington Court of Appeals in Sunderland v. City of Pasco is applied statewide, the Washington Housing Policy Act prevents a city ITom requiring a proyider of group housing for disabled or handicapped persons to undergo a special or conditional use pennit process before being allowed to occupy a single-family house, ifthe city pennits a "family" to obtain immediate occupancy of a residential structure. 8 David and Gaus, Protecting Group Homes for the Non-Handicapped: Zoning the Post-Edmonds Era, 1999 Zoning and Planning Law Handbook at Section 3.02[2], p. 91; City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, 514 U.S. at 729; Oxford House-C v. St. Louis, 77 F.3d at 252 ("Oxford House's own expert witness testified Oxford Houses with eight residents can provide significant therapeutic benefits for their members."). 11 Analysis: The Legislature adopted the Washington Housing Policy Act ("WHPA") in 1993. One ofthe WHPA's expressly stated purposes is to "[I]ncrease the supply of housing for persons with special needs." RCW 43.1 85B.005(2)(e). To that end, some ofthe Act's stated objectives are to "strengthen public and priyate institutions that are able to . . .assist very low-income and special needs households, provide housing for special needs populations,[ and] ensure fair and equal access to the housing market" RCW 43.1 85B.009(2), (6) and (7). One of the WHPA's provisions that directly affect cities is RCW 35A.63.240, which states as follows: No city may enact or maintain an ordinance, deyelopment regulation, zoning regulation or official control, policy, or administrative practice which treats a residential structure occupied by persons with handicaps differently than a similar residential structure occupied by a family or other unrelated individuals. As used in this section, "handicaps" are as defined in the federal fair housing amendments act of 1988 (42 D.S.C. Sec. 3602). RCW 35A_63.240. The only reported cases construing this section of the WHPA are two decisions arising out of a dispute between the City of Pasco and a group home provider, Sunderland Family Treatment Services. In the first decision, Sunderland v. Pasco, 127 Wn.2d 782, 903 P.2d 986 (1995) ("Sunderland r), the group home provider argued that the City of Pasco had discriminated against it by denying a special use permit for a group home for abused and neglected children proposed to be located in a single-family, low density zone (R-l). Sunderland argued that some ofthe abused and neglected children might be handicapped. The Supreme Court disagreed, and held that abuse and neglect were environmental and cultural factors, not handicaps within the meaning the FHAA and the WHP A. While those factors might produce physical or mental effects, those effects did not in every case limit the victim's participation in major life activities, and thus, abused and neglected children were not handicapped. Moreover, the City's rejection of the special use permit for proposed group home was based upon the children's age and family backgrounds, not on any perceived physical or mental impairment, and thus the denial was not discriminatory even if the WHPA applied. The Court did find, however, that the City's denial appeared to rest on neighborhood opposition to the facility, rather than on competent and substantial evidence as required by law. Because of the failure of either Sunderland or the City to create a sufficient record, the Supreme Court remanded the matter to the City for further proceedings. 12 Following the remand, Sunderland reyised its application to explain that, although its application was essentially the same, the proposed facility would now be used to house youths ages 12-17 with a diagnosed mental impairment. The children would be referred through mental health professions and would haye a diagnosed mental illness requiring a group setting with 24-hour professional staff supervision as part of a prescribed treatment plan. The home would not accept children who posed a danger to themselves or others, children actively using drugs or alcohol, or children with pending criminal charges. There would be a one-to-four staff to children ratio, with at least three staff people on duty at all times, with two staff coming and going every eight hours. Sunderland's property had an existing, yacant residence that did not require any exterior physical alterations. Pasco's Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval. The City Council, howeyer, held a second public hearing and denied the special use permit. Before both the Planning Commission and the City Council, Sunderland argued that the City had no authority to require the SUP. Following the denial, Sunderland sued, alleging that the denial violated the WHP A and the FHAA. The superior court agreed, and reversed the City's denial. The City appealed- The Court of Appeals, Diyision III, affirmed the reyersal. Sunderland v. Pasco, 107 Wn.App. 109,26 P.3d 955 (Div. 1112001) ("Sunderland /1'). It noted that the City had required Sunderland to undergo the SUP only because Sunderland's proposed home was not treated as a "family", in light of the City's code definition that stated that group homes were not "family" regardless of the number of occupants. Sunderland II, 107 Wn. App. at 120-121. Thus, the Court held, "the City violated the WHP A by adopting a regulatory scheme that permitted a "family" to obtain immediate occupancy of a residential structure but required "group care facilities" to obtain a SUP before occupying a similar residential structure." /d. at 122-23- The Court specifically rejected the City's citation to cases decided under the FHAA in which special or conditional use permits were allowed. The Court noted that those cases had been decided under the FHAA reasonable accommodation theory, but the WHP A "does not encompass the reasonable accommodation analysis." /d. at 124. The Court also rejected application of a Kansas federal court decision applying the disparate treatment analysis, noting that while the Kansas' court had held that intentional discrimination was not shown by use of a special permit process, the WHPA does not require a showing of intentional discrimination. This holding is particularly egregious because the WHPA's standard of prohibiting differential treatment of similarly-situated residential structures is in fact a disparate treatment standard identical in substance to the FHAA's disparate treatment standard. Finally, the Sunderland II Court also held that the City's requirement for, and denial of, a home occupation permit violated the WHPA. Pasco's code required 13 that a home occupation be conducted solely by persons residing within the dwelling unit on the premises, "subject to the definition of family." Pasco's code also required that the home occupation be carried on by "family members." The Court held that these provisions were too restrictive because they limited home occupation permits only to "families" and discriminated against handicapped residents not liying in a "family" situation. Id. at 126-28. The impact of Sunderland Irs holding for Federal Way is uncertain- The City of Pasco did not seek Supreme Court review of Sunderland 11, so there is no definitive ruling on this subject in Washington State, and the opinion of a particular division of the Court of Appeals is technically binding only upon trial courts within that division. It is "persuasiye authority" in other divisions. This means that trial courts within Diyision I (in which Federal Way is located) mayor may not choose to follow Sunderland II. If Sunderland II is applied on a statewide basis, however, the WHP A would prohibit Federal Way ITom applying a special use or conditional use permit process to an applicant seeking to occupy a singe-family home, unless the City also required a "family" seeking to occupy a similar home to undergo the same permit process. Under the terms of the August 3, 2001 reasonable accommodation letter sent to Compass Center, based on acceptable documentation that Oxford House would operate a residence for disabled persons in recovery, the City exempted Compass Center ITom "Federal Way land use processes, procedures, and fees_" The City's reasonable accommodation letter also noted that "the number of persons residing in the house would not be limited by the FWCC definition of family." Therefore, assuming for the purposes of argument that the rule announced in Sunderland II applies on a statewide basis, the position taken by the City to date complies with RCW 35A.63.240. 3. Mav the City enforce the Twin Lakes Coyenants. Conditions and Restrictions ("CC&Rs")? Short answer: No. Covenants are essentially contracts, and may only be enforced by the parties to or beneficiaries of the contract. The City is neither a party to the CC&Rs nor an owner of property benefited by them. Therefore, it cannot enforce the CC&Rs. Analysis: Covenants, conditions and restrictions, in order to be enforceable, must originate in a contractual covenant between two or more persons. A landowner cannot by himself place a running covenant on his own land, for the same reason that one cannot make a contract with himself. Therefore, enforcement of covenants, at least as between the original parties, is a matter ofthe law of contract. W. Stoebuck, Washington Practice Vol. 17, Real Estate Property Law, Section 3.2 14 (1995). The City was not a party to the original contract (i.e., the Declaration of CC&Rs), and therefore cannot bring an action to enforce them. Beyond the parties to an original contract of covenants, covenants can "run with the land," or bind and be enforced by the subsequent purchasers of the land burdened by the covenants. The doctrine of "running" is analogous to the contract doctrines of assignment of rights and delegation of duties. It is a doctrine by which remote parties are bound or benefited by contractual covenants made by the original parties. While ordinarily a party must consent to assignment or delegation, the law of running covenants imposes a duty or confers a benefit upon remote parties not because they consent, but because the covenant bears a relationship with parcels of land and because the parties have an interest in the same parcels of land. Rodruck v. Sand Point Maintenance Commission, 48 Wn.2d 565, 295 P.2d 714 (1956); W. Stoebuck, Section 3.2. And, because such subsequent purchasers are benefited by the CC&Rs that bind them, they are also entitled to enforce them. As the Twin Lakes CC&Rs Article XII, Section I, states: The Trustee, the Association, the Developer and each owner or contract purchaser of a lot or lots subject to this declaration, shall have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens and charges now or hereafter imposed by the provisions of this declaration.... Here, however, in addition to not being a party to the original contract, the City also does not haye an interest in any of the Twin Lakes property benefited by the CC&Rs, and therefore is not entitled to bring an action to enforce them. Homeowners' associations also may enforce CC&RS. The courts have expanded upon the idea that because every lot owner is bound to every other owner, the ability to enforce covenants extends to homeowners' associations that are contractually bound to obey bylaws. Rodruck, supra; W. Stoebuck, 3.21. Even under such an expanded analysis, however, the City cannot enforce the CC&Rs, because it is obviously not the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association, nor a member. A recently adopted Washington statute reinforces this conclusion. In 1995, in order to clarify the role of homeowners' associations, the legislature enacted RCW 64.38. Homeowners' associations are giyen authority for a yariety of activities under the statute, including the ability to institute litigation. "Unless otherwise proyided in the governing documents, an association may... (i]nstitute, defend, or intervene in litigation or administrative proceedings in its own name on behalf of itself or two or more owners on matters affecting the homeowners' association.. .". RCW 64.38.020(4)- The membership of an association under the statute is limited to "the owners of all real property over which the association has jurisdiction, both developed and undeyeloped." RCW 64.38.015. The logical 15 conclusion to be drawn ITom the statute's proyision is that the ability to institute litigation on matters affecting the association belongs to the association itself, as governed by a membership limited to owners of property within the association's jurisdiction. Since the City is not an owner of property in Twin Lakes, and is not the Homeowners' Association, the statute provides additional support for the conclusion that the City of Federal Way may not enforce the Twin Lakes CC&Rs. Eyen if the foregoing analysis were not applicable, the City's ability to initiate litigation is nevertheless goyerned by established authority on the matter of "standing." "Standing" is a judicial doctrine that limits the availability of judicial remedies to those particular persons who have sustained a serious enough injury to warrant the court's attention. Courts apply a two-part test to determine standing. First, the interest that the plaintiff seeks to protect must be "arguably within the zone of interests to be protected or regulated by the statue or constitutional guarantee in question." Second, the plaintiff must allege an "injury in fact", i. e. that he or she will be "specifically and perceptibly harmed" by the proposed action. Save A Valuable Environment v. City of Bothe II, 89 Wn.2d 862, 576 P.2d 401 (1978), at 405, citing Data Processing Services v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150,152-53,90 S.C!. 827, 830, 25 LEd.2d 184 (1970). "The doctrine of standing generally prohibits a party ITom asserting another person's rights..." Bunting v. State of Washington, 87 Wn.App. 647,651,943 P.2d 347 (1997).9 Based on this test, it is the individual property owners or the homeowners' association that would satisfY the requirements for standing, not the City. Only property owners and the association are within the zone of interests intended to be protected by the CC&Rs, and only the individual property owners and/or the homeowners' association can allege an "injury in fact." Since the City is not a Twin Lakes property owner and not a member of the association, the City would likely not have standing to pursue enforcement of the Twin Lakes CC&Rs. 4. May the City Pay the Costs of the Homeowners' Liti!!ation to Enforce the CC&Rs? Short answer: No. The City's payment oflitigation costs of private parties seeking to enforce priyate CC&Rs would be an unconstitutional gift of public funds or constitute an unlawful lending of credit. , Although the City generally has standing to enforce the rights of its citizens (see, e.g., Boilermakers Local 104 v. International Bhd. Of Boilermakers, 33 Wn.2d I, 203 P.2d 1019 (1949», the doctrine described in Bunting would likely prevent the City ITom enforcing the rights of a limited class of citizens accorded by virtue of those citizens' private real estate transactions. 16 Analysis: Article 8, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution states that: No county, city, town or other municipal corporation shall hereafter giye any money, or property, or loan its money, or credit to or in aid of any individual, association, company or corporation, except for the necessary support of the poor and infirm- . . . This prohibition is mandatory, and must be strictly observed. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility Dist. No. I ofSnohomish County, 77 Wn.2d 94, 459 P_2d 633 (1969). Its purpose is to preyent state funds from being used to benefit private interests where the public interest is not primarily being served. CLEANv. State, 130 Wn.2d 782,928 P.2d 1054 (1996). This proyision is violated where there is a transfer of property or money without consideration and with donatiye intent. Louthan v. King County, 94 Wn.2d 422,617 P.2d 977 (1980). Under a two-pronged test recently adopted by the Supreme Court, the first question is whether the funds are being expended to carry out a fundamentaJ purpose of government. If so, then no gift of public funds has occurred; if not, the court then focuses on the adequacy of the consideration receiyed and the donative intent of the appropriating body. CLEANv. City of Spokane, 133 Wn.2d 455, 947 P.2d 1169 (1997, cert. denied, 119 S.ct.45, 525 U.S. 812, 142 L.Ed.2d 35. Under this constitutional provision, the use of municipal bonds to finance water pollution control facilities for private, industrial corporations was unconstitutional, because money obtained through the sale of municipal bonds was essentially loaned directly to the private corporations to enable them to purchase the water pollution control facilities. Port of Longview v. Taxpayers, 85 Wn.2d 216,527 P.2d 263 (1974), rehearing denied, 533 P.2d 128 (1975). Likewise, a city's purchase of property with the intent to resell it to a private deyeloper is a loan of credit in violation of this constitutional proyision. Lassila v. Wenatchee, 89 Wn.2d 804, 576 P.2d 54 (1978). If the City were to pay a private parties' litigation costs (either indiyidual property owners or the Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association) to enforce the Association's private covenants, it would likely be an unconstitutional gift of public funds or lending of credit. The enforcement of private covenants is not a fundamental purpose of government. The City would not receive any consideration in return for payment of the litigation costs, and would likely be held to have "donative intent" in providing the funds to the property owners or the homeowners' association. Accordingly, the City may not fund litigation to enforce the Twin Lakes' CC&Rs. 17 5. Is the City vrohibited bv the CC&Rs from avvroviul! uses that mil!ht violate the CC&Rs? Short answer: No. The CC&Rs are not binding on the City in its land use decisions. Analysis: One citizen inquired via email as to the City's duty to refrain from approying uses, such as the Oxford House, when such a use might yiolate private CC&Rs- As stated by the citizen: What should the responsibility ofthe City be to ensuring that their actions do not violate the laws of a subordinate community? The Federal Government does not force the subordinate State Goyernments to give up their laws just because they are more strict, instead they allow laws that add to the strictness as long as they do not violate the superior law. Email from Sean Marshall to David Moseley, January 4, 2002. Mr. Marshall's analogy to the "Federal Government" notwithstanding, this is not a situation involving "preemption," in which a superior government body may expressly prevent an inferior goyernment body from enforcing its laws. The Twin Lakes Homeowners' Association is not a goyernment body, but rather is a priyate association charged with enforcing private covenants or contracts among its property owner members. The City's codes and regulations constitute the applicable law on local zoning matters within the City's borders and are not affected by private agreements such as CC&Rs. Ifthe answer were otherwise, uniform enforcement of City codes would be impossible because permissible uses under the zoning code would vary from subdivision to subdivision. This does not mean that individual homeowners may not enforce their own private CC&Rs against each other. Just as the federal goyernment generally does not prevent cities from adopting and enforcing different zoning codes, the City of Federal Way does not prevent individual homeowner associations from adopting or enforcing different CC&Rs. Enforcement of the priyate CC&Rs, however, is a private matter, as discussed above, and is not something in which the City may become involved. This is analogous to the situation that faced the City of Federal Way with respect to an application for a building permit by Dayid Thorstad to build a single-family home on what essentially was a cul-de-sac island in the Marine Hills West subdiyision. After determining that the particular property was a legal building lot, the City issued the building permit for the house. Adjacent property owners, howeyer, believed that the property was not a "lot" within the meaning of their local CC&Rs and brought suit to enjoin construction. The trial court agreed and 18 granted declaratory relief. Thorstad v. Federal Way Water and Sewer District, 73 Wn.App. 638,639,870 P_2d 1046 (Div. 11994). Mr. Thorstad appealed and eventually obtained a decision ITom the Court of Appeals that 1/3 of his property was bound by the CC&Rs but the other 2/3 was not. ¡d. While the trial court's decision remained in effect, howeyer, the property owner could not legally proceed with construction, even though the City had issued a building permit that would otherwise authorize construction- The situation here is the same. While the City may issue a decision or permit authorizing a land use or remodeling of a home, the property remains subject to applicable covenants governing the property. The City's decisions will not prevent the homeowners ftom pursuing enforcement of the Twin Lakes CC&Rs. 6. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a home occupation land use approyal prior to occupyinl! the Twin Lakes house? Short answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not fit the definition of home occupation under the FWCc. Therefore, no home occupation land use approval may be required. Analysis: A "home occupation" as defined in the FWCC means "an occupation, enterprise, activity or profession which is incidental to a residential use, which is carried on for profit or customarily carried on for profit and which is not an otherwise permitted use in the zone in which it occurs." FWCC 22-1. "Residential use", by contrast, is defined as "developments and occupancy in which persons sleep and prepare food, other than deyelopments used for transient occupancy." FWCC 22- I. Oxford House proposes that its tenants will use the Twin Lakes home for sleeping, preparing food and other activities normally associated with residential use, on other than a transient basis. If true, this use would not be a "home occupation," because the use would be residential rather than an "occupation, enterprise, actiyity or profession which is incidental to a residential use." Even if the proposed use met the definition of a "home occupation," because Oxford House does not propose to have paid employees working in the house, and no actiyities carried on for profit within the house no additional reyiew is required for the facility under the home occupation sections of the code. FWCC 22-22- 1066 et.seq. 7. May the City require the Oxford House to obtain a business license prior to occupyinl! the Twin Lakes house? Short answer: No. The use proposed by Oxford House is residential and does not fit the definition of business under the FWCC. 19 Analysis: FWCC 9-29 states that "[n]o person shall transact, engage in or carry on any business, trade, profession, occupation, calling or activity without first having been issued a proper and current registration or having filed and qualified for an exemption as provided herein. FWCC 9-29. The definition of both "business" and "small business" in FWCC 9-26 requires employment of persons for private profit or benefit. Since none of the residents of Oxford House are employees working for private profit or benefit, the use of the property does not qualify as a business under the FWCC. Additionally, since the only activities proposed to be carried on at the property are residential activities, as opposed to "a trade, profession, occupation, calling or activity," a business registration would not be required under FWCC 9-26 et. seq. 8. Mav the City withdraw or modify its decision to orovide Commnnity Develooment Block Grant fundin!! to the Como ass Center? Short answer: No. Analysis: As discussed above, the contract funds have already been disbursed to Compass Center by King County, which administers the City's CDBG funds through the Consortium- Second, the contract between King County and the Compass Center provides that the contract may be terminated by the County for convenience or cause. It also states, however, that Compass Center is required to return funds only if a termination results ITom the acts or omissions by Compass Center, including misappropriation, nonperformance of required services or fiscal mismanagement. Even in that event, only those funds that were misappropriated or that are "unexpended" by Compass Center need be returned. Under the facts as we currently understand them, there would be no basis for a termination for cause, and even if so, no basis by which to demand return of the $20,000. Finally, withdrawal of funding at this point, in response to neighborhood opposition to housing for disabled, could be held to be discrimination in violation ofthe FHAA. 9. Is the Compass Center. Oxford House. or the City financially liable for the activity of the Twin Lakes house residents? Short answer: The City cannot proyide a legal opinion as to the rights of Twin Lakes homeowners against third parties (i.e., Compass Center or the Oxford House). The City would not be liable, because it is protected from suit for its land use permitting actions by the public duty doctrine. 20 Analysis: Under Washington case law, an exception to the common law rule that one has no duty to prevent a third party from causing harm to another may be found where a "special relationship" with either the victim or the criminal exists. Hertog v. City a/Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 265,979 P.2d 400 (1999), citing Petersen v. State, 100 Wn.2d 421, 671 P.2d 230 (1983). In Hertog, the Court found a special relationship existed between the City, its probation counselors and municipal court probationers and that the City and counselors had a duty to control probationers to protect others ITom reasonably foreseeable harm resulting ITom the probationers' dangerous propensities. Hertog, at 281. Because the City has not taken on the responsibility for supervision and will not be providing any in- home care, there is no "special relationship", and consequently no liability. And, under the Public Duty Doctrine, approval of a development alone is insufficient to giye rise to liability on the part of a municipality. Phillips v. King County, 136 Wn.2d 946, 968 P.2d 871 (1998). 10. If the City may not take any action concernin2 the Oxford House's proposal to OCCUpy the Twin Lakes house. what options (if any) does the City Council have with respect to any future Oxford House or other 2roup home applications? Short answer: The City Council may consider adoption of code amendments to regulate future group housing applications, but any amendments must be carefully tailored to ayoid discrimination in yiolation of the FHAA or the WHP A. Analvsis: The City might consider several different types of code amendments. First, the Council could adopt a process specifically for consideration of "reasonable accommodation" requests under the Fair Housing AInendments Act. The Joint Statement by the Departments of Justice and Housing and Urban Development indicates that if a local zoning scheme specifies procedures for seeking a departure ITom the general rule, "these procedures must ordinarily be followed." Joint Statement at 3. If no procedure is specified, persons with disabilities or a proyider for them may neyertheless request a reasonable accommodation. ¡d. The Joint Statement, along with the analysis giyen the reasonable accommodation issue by recent court decisions, suggests that the City could institute a formal procedure for consideration of "reasonable accommodation" requests. This procedure could include some type of public notice and/or the opportunity for public comment. Likewise, the Council could adopt code amendments defining a Type I Group Home, identifying the zones in which they are permitted, and specifying the procedure for review of any needed approyals. Such amendments would require careful tailoring, as well as evidentiary support, as previous efforts by other cities 21 haye been found to be discriminatory on their face. See, e.g., Children's Alliance v. Bellevue, 950 F.Supp. at 1497. Permit requirements per se are not unreasonable, e.g., Turning Point v. Caldwell, especially when nondiscriminatory and directed to consideration of impacts that eyidence indicates may arise from the types of use at issue. These could include traffic, parking and, given sufficient eyidence, secondary effects such as increased crime. Careful consideration should also be giyen to the Washington Housing Policy Act so as not to improperly differentiate between housing for the handicapped, on the one hand, and housing for families or other unrelated persons, on the other. KIOxford Houseldocumentsllegalmemo 22 Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD Pagelof5 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP HOMES, LOCAL LAND USE, AND THE FAIR HOUSING ACT Since the federal Fair Housing Act ("the Act") was amended by Congress in 1988 to add protections fot petsons with disabilities and families with children, there has been a great deal of litigation concerning the Act's effect on the ability of local governments to exercise control over group living arrangements, particularly for persons with disabilities. The Department of Justice has taken an active part in much of this litigation, often following referral of a matter by the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). This joint statement provides an overview of the Fair Housing Act's requirements in this area. Specific topics are addressed in more depth in the attached Questions and Answers. The Fair Housing Act prohibits a broad range of practices that discriminate against individuals on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, and disability.lU The Act does not pre-empt local zoning laws. However, the Act applies to municipalities and other local government entities and prohibits them from making zoning or land use decisions or implementing land use policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against protected persons, including individuals with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful -- . To utilize land use policies or actions that treat groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for persons with disabilities or a specific type of disability, such as mental illness, from locating in a particular area, while allowing other groups of unrelated individuals to live together in that area. . To take action against, or deny a permit, for a home because of the disability of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be denying a building permit for a home because it was intended to provide housing for persons with mental retardation. . To refuse to make reasonable accommodations in land use and zoning policies and procedures where such accommodations may be necessary to afford persons or groups of persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing. . What constitutes a reasonable accommodation is a case-by-case determination. . Not all requested modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. If a requested modification imposes an undue financial or administrative burden on a local government, or if a modification creates a fundamental alteration in a local government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation. The disability discrimination provisions of the Fair Housing Act do not extend to persons who claim to be disabled solely on the basis of having been adjudicated a juvenile delinquent, having a criminal record, Ot being a sex offender. Furthermore, the Fair Housing Act does not protect persons who currently use illegal drugs, persons who have been convicted ofihe manufactute Ot sale of illegal drugs, or persons with or without disabilities who present a direct threat to the persons or property 'of others. HUD and the Department of Justice encourage parties to group home disputes to explore all reasonable dispute resolution procedures, like mediation, as alternatives to litigation. DATE: AUGUST 18, 1999 Questions and Answers on the Fair Housing Act and Zoning Q. Does the Fair Housing Act pre-emp! local zoning laws? No. "Pre-emption" is a legal term meaning that one level of government has taken over a field and left no room for hup:llwwwllsdoj.gov/crtihousing/lìnaI8_I.htm 1/3/2002 Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD Page 2 of 5 government at any other level to pass laws or exercise authority in that area. The Fair Housing Act is not a land use or zoning statute; it does not pre-empt local land use and zoning laws. This is an area where state law typically gives local governments primary power. However, if that power is exercised in a specific instance in a way that is inconsistent with a fedemllaw such as the Fair Housing Act, the federal law will control. Long before the 1988 amendments, the courts had held that the Fair Housing Act prohibited local governments from exercising their land use and zoning powers in a discriminatory way. Q. What is a group home within the meaning of the Fair Housing Act? The term "group home" does not have a specific legal meaning. In this statement, the term "group home" tefers to housing occupied by groups of unrelated individuals with disabilities.{:!) Sometimes. but not always. housing is provided by organizations that also offer various services for individuals with disabilities living in the group homes. Sometimes it is this group home operator. rather than the individuals who live in the home. that interacts with local government in seeking permits and making requests for reasonable accommodations on behalf of those individuals. The term "group home" is also sometimes applied to any group of unrelated persons who live together in a dwelling-- such as a group of students who voluntarily agree to share the rent on a house. The Act does not generally affect the ability of local governments to regulate housing of this kind, as long as they do not discriminate against the residents on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, handicap (disability) or familial status (families with minor children). Q. Who are persons with disabilities within the meaning of the Fair Housing Act? The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap. "Handicap" has the same legal meaning as the term "disability" which is used in other federal civil rights laws. Persons with disabilities (handicaps) are individuals with mental or physical impairments which substantially limit one or more major life activities. The tenn mental or physical impairment may include conditions such as blindness. hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic fatigue, learning disability, head injury, and mental illness. The term major life activity may include seeing, heating, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks, caring fot one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also protects persons who have a record of such an impairment, or are regarded as having such an impairment. Current users vI' illegal controlled substances, persons convicted for illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance, sex offenders, and juvenile offenders, are not considered disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act affords no protections to individuals with or without disabilities who present a direct threat to the persons or property of others. Determining whether someone poses such a direct threat must be made on an individualized basis, however, and cannot be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. Q. What kinds of local zoning and land use laws relating to group homes violate the Fair Housing Act? Local zoning and land use laws that treat groups of unrelated petsons with disabilities less favorably than similar groups of unrelated persons without disabilities violate the Fair Housing Act. For example, suppose a city's zoning ordinance defines a "family" to include up to six unrelated persons living together as a household unit. and gives such a group of unrelated persons the right to live in any zoning district without special permission. If that ordinance also disallows a group home for six or fewer people with disabilities in a certain district or requires this home to seek a use permit, such requirements would conflict with the Fair Housing Act. The ordinance treats persons with disabilities worse than persons without disabilities. A local government may genetally restrict the ability of groups of unrelated persons to live together as long as the restrictions are imposed on all such groups. Thus. inthe case where a family is defined to include up to six unrelated people, an ordinance would not, on its face, violate the Act if a group home for seven people with disabilities was not allowed to locate in a single family zoned neighborhood, because a group of seven unrelated people without disabilities would also be disallowed. However, as discussed below, because persons with disabilities are also entitled to request reasonable accommodations in /Ules and policies, the group home for seven persons with disabilities would have to be given the opportunity to seek an exception or waiver. If the criteria for reasonable accommodation are met, the permit 11I11':!/WWw.usdo.gov/crt/holising/lïnaIX_I.htlll 1/3/2001 Joinl Statement of DOJ and HUD Page 3 of 5 would have to be given in that instance, but the ordinance would not be invalid in all circumstances. Q. What is a reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Act? As a general rule, the Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to tefuse to make "reasonable accommodations" (modifications or exceptions) to rules, policies, practices, Ot services. when such accommodations may be necessary to afford persons with disabilities an equal opportunity to use or enjoy a dwelling. Even though a zoning ordinance imposes on group homes the same restrictions it imposes on other groups of unrelated people, a local government may be required, in individual cases and when requested to do so, to grant a reasonable accommodation to a group home for persons with disabilities. For example, it may be a reasonable accommodation to waive a setback requirement so that a paved path of travel can be provided 10 residents who have mobility impairments. A similar waivet might not be required for a different type of group home where residents do not have difficulty negotiating steps and do not need a setback in order to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Not all requested modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. Whether a particular accommodation is reasonable depends on the facts, and must be decided on a case-by.case basis. The determination of what is reasonable depends on the answers to two questions: First, does the tequest impose an undue burden or expense on the local government? Second, does the proposed use create a fundamental alteration in the zoning scheme? If the answer to either question is "yes," the tequested accommodation is unteasonable. What is "reasonable" in one circumstance may not be "reasonable" in another. For example, suppose a local government does not allow groups of four or more unrelated people to live together in a single-family neighborhood. A group home for four adults with mental retardation would very likely be able to show that it will have no more impact on parking, ttaffic, noise, utility use, and other typical concerns of zoning than an "Ofdinary family." In this circumstance, there would be no undue burden Of expense for the local government nor would the single-family character of the neighborhood be fundamentally altered. Granting an exception or waiver to the group home in this circumstance does not invalidate the ordinance. The local government would still be able to keep groups of unrelated persons without disabilities from living in single-family neighborhoods. By contrast, a fifty-bed nursing home would not ordinarily be considered an appropriate use in a single-family neighborhood, for obvious teasons having nothing to do with the disabilities of its residents. Such a facility might or might not impose significant burdens and expense on the community, but it would likely create a fundamental change in the single-family character of the neighborhood. On the other hand, a nursing home might not create a "fundamental change" in a neighborhood zoned for multi-family housing. The scope and magnitude of the modification requested, and the features of the surrounding neighborhood are among the factors that will be taken into account in determining whether a requested accommodation is reasonable. Q. What is the procedure for requesting a reasonable accommodation? Where a local zoning scheme specifies procedures fot seeking a departure from the general rule, courts have decided, and the Departml'nt of Justice and HUD agree, that these procedures must Ofdinarily be followed. If no procedure is specified, persons with disabilities may, nevertheless, request a reasonable accommodation in some other way, and a local government is obligated to gran I it if it meets the criteria discussed above. A local government's failure to respond to a request for reasonable accommodation or an inordinate delay in responding could also violate the Act. Whether a procedure for requesting accommodations is provided or not, if local government officials have previously made statements or otherwise indicated that an application would not receive fair consideration, Of if the procedure itself is discriminatOfY, then individuals with disabilities living in a group home (and/or its operator) might be able to go directly into court to request an order for an accommodation. Local governments are encouraged to provide mechanisms for requesting reasonable accommodations that operate promptly and efficiently, without imposing significant costs or delays. The local government should also make efforts to insure that the availability' of such mechanisms is well known within the community. Q. When, if ever, can a local government limit the number of group homes that can locate in a certain area? http://www.usdoj.govlcrt/housìngllinaI8_I.htm 113/2002 Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD Page 4 of 5 A concern expressed by some local government officials and neighborhood tesidents is that certain jurisdictions, governments, or particular neighborhoods within a jurisdiction, may come to have more than theit "fair share" of group homes. Thete are legal ways to address this concern. The Fair Housing Act does not prohibit most governmental programs designed to encourage people of a particular race to move to neighborhoods occupied ptedominantly by people of another race. A local government that believes a particular atea within its boundaries has its "fair share" of group homes, could offer incentives to providers to locate future homes in other neighborhoods. However, some state and local governments have tried to address this concern by enacting laws requiring that group homes be at a certain minimum distance from one another. The Department of Justice and HUD take the position, and most COUtts that have addressed the issue agree, that density restrictions are generally inconsistent with the Fair Housing Act. We also believe, however, that if a neighborhood came to be composed largely of group homes, that could adversely affect individuals with disabilities and would be inconsistent with the objective of integrating persons with disabilities into the community. Especially in the licensing and regulatory process, it is appropriate to be concerned about the setting for a group home. A consideration of over-concentration could be considered in this context. This objective does not, however, justify requiring separations which have the effect of foreclosing group homes from locating in entire neighborhoods. Q. What kinds of health and safety regulations can be imposed upon group homes? The great majority of group homes for persons with disabilities are subject to state regulations intended to protect the health and safety of theit residents. The Department of Justice and HUD believe, as do responsible group home operators, that such licensing schemes are necessary and legitimate. Neighbors who have concerns that a particular group home is being operated inappropriately should be able to bring theit concerns to the attention of the responsible licensing agency. We encourage the states to commit the resources needed to make these systems responsive to tesident and community needs and concerns. Regulation and licensing requirements for group homes are themselves subject to scrutiny undet the Fait Housing Act. Such requirements based on health and safety concerns can be discriminatory themselves or may be cited sometimes to disguise discriminatory motives behind attempts to exclude group homes from a community. Regulators must also recognize that not all individuals with disabilities living in group home settings desire or need the same level of services or protection. For example, it may be appropriate to require heightened fire safety measures in a group home for people who are unable to move about without assistance. But fot another group of persons with disabilities who do not desire or need such assistance, it would not be appropriate to require fire safety measures beyond those normally imposed on the size and type of residential building involved. Q. Can a local government consider the feelings of neighbors in making a decision about granting a permit to a group home to locate in a residential neighborhood? In the same way a local government would break the law if it rejected low-income housing in a community because of neighbors' fears that such housing would be occupied by racial minorities, a local government can violate the Fait Housing Act if it blocþ a group home or denies a requested reasonable accommodation in tesponse to neighbors' stereotypical fears Ot prejudices about persons with disabilities. This is so even if the individual government decision-makers are not themselves personally prejudiced against persons with disabilities. If the evidence shows that the decision-makers wete responding to the wishes of theit constituents, and that the constituents were motivated in substantial part by discriminatory concerns, that could be enough to prove a violation. Of course, a city councilor zoning board is not bound by everything that is said by every person who speaks out at a public hearing. It is the record as a whole that will be determinative. If the record shows that there were valid reasons for denying an application that wete not telated. to the disability of the prospective residents, the courts will give little weight to isolated discriminatory statements. If, however, the putportedly legitimate reasons advanced to support the action are not objectively valid, the courts are likely to treat them as ptetextual, and to find that there has been discrimination. For example, neighbors and local government officials may be legitimately concerned that a group home for adults in certain circumstances may create more demand for on,street parking than would a typical family. It is not a violation of the Fair Housing Act for neighbors or officials to raise this concern and to ask the provider to respond. A valid unaddressed concern about inadequate parking facilities could justify denying the application, if anothet type of facility http://www.usdoj.gov/crtlhousing/finaI8_I.htm 1/312002 Joint Statement of DOJ and HUD PageS of 5 would ordinarily be denied a permit for such parking problems. However, if a group of individuals with disabilities or a group home operator shows by credible and unrebutted evidence that the home will not create a need for more parking spaces, or submits a plan to provide whatever off-street parking may be needed. then parking concerns would not support a decision to deny the home a petmit. Q. What is the status of group living arrangements for children under the Fair Housing Act? In the course of litigation addressing group homes for persons with disabilities, the issue has arisen whether the Fair Housing Act also provides protections for group living arrangements for children. Such living arrangements ate covered by the Fait Housing Act's provisions prohibiting discrimination against families with children. For example. a local government may not enforce a zoning ordinance which treats group living arrangements for children less favorably than it treats a similar group living arrangement for unrelated adults. Thus. an ordinance that defined a group of up to six unrelated adult persons as a family, but specifically disallowed a group living arrangement for six or fewer children, would. on its face. discriminate on the basis of familial status. Likewise. a local government might violate the Act if it denied a permit to such a home because neighbors did not want to have a group facility for children next to them. The law generally recognizes that children require adult supervision. Imposing a reasonable requirement for adequate supervision in group living facilities for childten would not violate the familial status provisions of the Fair Housing Act. Q. How are zoning and land use matters handled by HUD and the Department of Justice? The Fair Housing Act gives the Department of Housing and Urban Development the power to receive and investigate complaints of discrimination. including complaints that a local government has discriminated in exercising its land use and zoning powers. HUD is also obligated by statute to attempt to conciliate the complaints that it teceives, even before it completes an investigation. In matters involving zoning and land use, HUD does not issue a charge of discrimination. Instead, HUD refers matters it believes may be metitorious to the Department of Justice which, in its discretion, may decide to bring suit against the respondent in such a case. The Department of Justice may also bring suit in a case that has not been the subject of a HUD complaint by exercising its power to initiate litigation alleging a "pattern or practice" of discrimination or a denial of rights to a group of persons which taises an issue of general public importance. The Department of Justice's principal objective in a suit of this kind is to remove significant barriers to the housing opportunities available for persons with disabilities. The Department ordinarily will not participate in litigation to challenge discriminatory ordinances which are not being enforced, unless there is evidence that the mere existence of the provisions are preventing or discouraging the development of needed housing. If HUD determines that there is no reasonable basis to believe that thete may be a violation, it will close an investigation without referring the :natter to the Department of Justice. Although the Department of Justice would still have independent "pattern or practice" authority to take enforcement action in the matter that was the subject of the closed HUD investigation, that would be an unlikely event. A HUD or Department of Justice decision not to proceed with a zoning or land use mailer does not foreclose private plaintiffs from pursuing a claim. Litigation can be an expensive. time-consuming, and uncertain process for all parties. HUD and the Department of Justice encourage parties to group home disputes to explore all reasonable alternatives to litigation, including alternative dispute resolution procedures. like mediation. HUD attempts to conciliate all Fair Housing Act complaints that it receives. In addition, it is the Department of Justice's policy to offer prospective defendants the opportunity to engage in pre-suit settlement negotiations. except in the most unusual circumstances. I. The Fair Housing Act uses the term "handicap." This document uses the term "disability" which has exactly the same legal meaning. 2, There are groups of unrelated persons with disabilities who choose to live together who do not considet their living arrangements "group homes." and it is inappropriate to consider them "group homes" as that concept is discussed in this statement. http://www.lIsdoj.gov/crt/housing/linaI8_I.htm 1/3/2002 . . KING COUNTY CDBG CONSORTIUM 2001 CDBG Pass-through City ~roject Application 1. Project Number and Title: 6. Oxford House Transitional Housing 2. Project Location (street address and jurisdiction): Yet to be determined. Somewhere in South King County. 3. Project Summary: The Compass Center and Oxford Houses of Washington will partner, using 2001 CDBG Pass-through funds, to purchase and rehabilitate one single family home at a site yet to be determined in South King County. This award will be applied to the acquisition costs of the overall project. The project will act as transitional housing for at least eight individuals in recovery from drug and alcohol addiction. As a site has not located, it is not possible to determine if the project will meet the criteria of the ESA Section 7 No Effects Checklist. However, this award is made for acquisition, which is on the checklist. Therefore, should the project require ESA review, the funds for review would be from a different revenue source. 4. National Objective A. Citation Low /Mod Income Housing 208(a)(3) Housing Activity B. Explanation (attach required documentationlrecords) Housing units will be occupied primarily by low- and moderate-income individuals. 5. Eligible Activity (This is a menu of common activities - please keep the applicable citation and delete the rest) 202 Rehabilitation 6. Subrecipient Compass Center 77 Washington Street Seattle, WA 98104 Contact: Mary Burki, King County HCD, (206) 296-8697 Page 1 7. Line Item Budget Personnel Services (detail below) $ Office or Operating Supplies $ Consultant or Purchased Services $ Construction Contracts $ Communications $ Travel and Training $ Other (specify below): Property Acquisition $20,000 Total Pass-through City Funds: $20,000 8. Personnel Detail N/A 9. Accomplishments Acquisition Project Schedule Task Projected Completion Date Comolete environmental review Purchase and Sale Aoreement executed Februarv 2001 Aoora/sal complete Februarv 2001 Build/no Insoection comolete Februarv 2001 Hazardous Material Assessment comolete Februarv 2001 Closina March 2001 Page 2 OXFORD HO ASHINGTON April 25,2000 THOMAS M. DUGAN mEASURER, OXr-oRD HOUSE INCj STATE OF WASHINGTON REPRESÉNT~.T1VE ",~ F~ r.-;¡ [<ò n \;:~ 1<: r:\ 'i U: . h1 ..r:; ¡; ," I!; ¡[Ii I' .." ! í APQ? 6 7"00 i 1i L 'I ., ,1.1. !i'I' !-'I ¡By ---. --------1 Cameron Parker, CDBG Coordinator GtyofFederai Way 33530 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mr. Parker: On behalf of Oxford House, Inc. and the State of Washington's Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (DASAS) I 'Want to express my excitement about the prospect of partnering with the King Omnty Housing Authority (K. ŒIA) to create new Oxford Houses in King County. Omently there are 15 Oxford Houses in King County. All of these houses operate under lease agreements with private landlords. The fIrSt house was created in 1990. The last house opened in King Countyin 1998. As you might imagine, the housing market in King County is rapialy pricing Oxford Houses out of the market. It is also becoming increasingly difficult to renew leases on the existing houses at rates affordable to the residents. Oxford House is not interested in owning propettysothe linkage with the KŒIA forms a natural partnership where the Authority owns the propetty and Oxford House leases th1 struCtUre and operates the program. Both parties do what they know best. ~ow Con'lfass ~ Throughout the State of Washington Oxford House provides a clean and sober, supportive living environment for over 600 persons in ~overy. Over 80% of the persons who enter an Oxford House remain clean andsober during their residency at the house. The average stay for men is 12 months and for women 9 months. The Oxford House, Inc. program is a recognized leader in the field of substance abuse, not only in WaShington but also nationally. Afonnula for success has evolved over the past 20 years. The program's focus is that of self-management. Participation in management and operation of a house is a requirement of residency and a willingness to do so is a key ingredient for admission to a house. As an Outreach Worker, paid by the süte's DASAS program, my job is to develop new Oxford Houses throughout the State of Washington and to nurtUre those that have been created. I look forward to this new partnership with public funders and the KŒA as we all focus on the goal of deyeloping clean and sober housing for persons in recovery. ~~ ir- ~om Dugan '-::'-~Â:'-( ~~~ THE COMPASS CENTER A Lutheran Otganization .:-. Board of Directors Shari Bltcon Verlon Brown Marty Dasler Mike Halvorson Cheryl Hart Stacy Kern Kacey Kroeger Julie Lightfoot Ron H. Lynch Stephen Nelson DeMar Sathe< Joseph Sidbury Heather Simmons John Sinkula Ed Stemple PelerSIrucI< Thao rled1 Paul Winterstein Rick Friedhoff Executtve Director 77 S. Washington Street Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 461-7835 Fax (206) 461-3874 c RECEIVED BY . MU'" ,...-v ~';VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUL 13 2001 ~O{-IOd.~JO-OÙ ..."",'. '.'" July 13, 2001 Ms. Kathy McOung Director Community Devdopment Services Gty of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 RE: Compass Center/OxfDrd House home for persons in recovery Dear Ms- McOung: The purpose of this cotTeSpondence is to seek a letter of detenninat:ion that the proposed use for a single family home in the Gty of Federal Way is permitted under the City of Federal Way's Muniåpal Code, Section 22.1. Definitions: Family. Family means an individual or two or more individuals related by not more than four degrees of affinity or consanguinity and including persons under legal guardianship, or a group of not more than five persons who are not related by four degrees or fewer degrees of affinity or consanguinity; provided, however that any limitation on the number of residents resulting from this definition shall not be applied if it prohibits the city from making reasonable accommodations to disabled persons in order to afford such persons equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling a required by the Fair HousWgActof 1988, 42USC3604 (f) (3) (b). The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1988 defines a "disabled person" in Section 802 (h) [42USC3601] as follows: "Handicap" means, with respect to a person- (1) a physical or mental impairment wlùch substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, . (2) a record of having such an impairment, or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment, but such term does not include current, illegal use of!;!r addiction to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the controlled Substances Act (21 use 802»- There are numerous examples of case lawwere "person in recoverý' have been detennined to meet the definition of "handicap" under the Fair Housing Act of 1988. Based on this history-, both The Compass Center and Oxford House believe that their proposed use of a single family house in the Stone Brook neighborhood of Federal Way meet the Gty's definition of "Family" and is therefore a permitted use. The Compass Center is a nonprofit organization that provides housing to low-income families and individuals. They have been providing services for over 80 years and own and! or operate 10 facilities serving 165 families or individuals. Their CWTent annual operating budget is just over $2.8 million. . A'-""dWa""""" .' : - . (- ( Oxford House is a nonprofit organization that is dedicated to providing housing to persons in recovety. They have been providing housing for 26 years. In King County, Oxford House leases 16 houses ?,at serve about 130 persons in recovety. StateWide;Oxford House leases 89 houses that serve 700 persons III recovety. The Gtyof Federal Wrr¡, along with King County and the State of Washington, has allocated funding for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a single-family house for the pwpose of housing persons in recovety. Federal Wrr¡ awarded the project $20,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds in 2000. The Compass Center intends to purchase a single-family house that is zoned RS, residential, single family (most likely RS9.6) and lease the hone to Oxford House for use as housing for up to eight persons in recovety. The Oxford House model is one of self-management where residents take responsibility for management of the house (paying bills, keeping the house and yard clean and tidy, undertaking minor maintenance tasks, selecting new residents). Residents also take responsibility for peer support and encourage fellow residents to seek the assistance they need to remain clean and sober. Residents who fail to remain clean and sober are asked to leave the house. StateWide, over 80% of Oxford House residents remain clean and sober while in residence at one of the homes. The eight residents of the house will meet weekly to discuss household chores, money matters like rent and bills, and issues related to maintenance of sobriety. "Officers" of the house will meet montbJy with officers from other Oxford Houses at "chapter" meetings to discuss overall operating of each house in the chapter. Typically, a chapter is comprised of nine or ten Oxford Houses located in the same general area. The Federal Wrr¡ house will join a chapter of nine Oxford Houses in northern Pierce County. As the landlord, Compass Center will be responsible for major repairs and maintenance matters, and will manage the replacement reserve account. We are committed to the long -term life of the house and property and will maintain such in top condition. For building emergencies, residents will contact The Compass Center via a 24-hour phone number. For housing operations emergencies, residents can contact an Oxford House outreach worker via a 24-hour phone number. The Compass Center and Oxford House are proud of housing opportunities they provide for persons in need of clean and sober housing and look forward to providing housing for persons in recovety in the South King County area. In addition, both The Compass Center and Oxford are committed to being good neighbors. We wolk hard to see our projects successfully integrated into the neighborhoods where they are located. We would be more than happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss this project further. Please feel free to contact myself or Janice Hougen, the Program Manager, at (206) 461-7835. Sincerely, 7ii'd ~ William R Friedhoff Executive Director t (Q) l~rf . (253) 661-4000 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 August 3, 2001 Mr. William R. Friedhofft Executive Director The Compass Center 77 South Washington Street Seattle, WA 98104 Re: 01-102820-00-AD, Oxford House Inquiry Dear Mr. Friedhoff: This letter is in response to your July 13, 2001 request for determination that the proposed use for a single-family home in Federal Way is permitted under the city's definition of family. Your letter states that your non-profit agency intends to purchase a house in a Federal Way single-family residential zoning district and lease the house to Oxford House. This non-profit organization will provide housing to persons in recovery. The Oxford House model typically houses up to eight persons in recovery. Under the dty's definition section of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1, family means an individual or two or more individuals related by not more than four degrees of affinity or consanguinity and induding persons under legal guardianship, or a group of not more than five persons who are not related by four or fewer degrees of affinity or consanguinity. However, the limitation on the number of persons residing in a structure shall not be applied if it prohibits the dty from making reasonable accommodations to disabled persons in order to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling unit as required by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA), 42 U.S.C 3604(f)(3)(b). Based on the FHAA, the dty must provide reasonable accommodation to disabled or handicapped persons. As you indicated, the definition of handicapped has been interpreted to ¡ndude persons recovering from addiction to an illegal drug as long as they are not currently using this illegal drug. Therefore, based on acceptable documentation that Oxford House operates a residence for persons in recovery and provides services to these disabled persons, the residential project would be considered exempt from Federal Way land use processes, procedures, Mr. Friedhoff August 3, 2001 Page 2 ..- '-."'. i ' \:;;;,.:. "':;:: and fees. The number of persons residing in the house would not be limited by the FWCC definition of family. Please be advised that an Oxford House project would not be exempt from the Uniform Building Code (UBe) requirements, and building permits must be obtained for any work proposed at the residential unit. In addition, if Oxford House is regulated by the State of Washington as a licensed care fadlity provider, the Oxford House residential unit shall be reviewed for compliance as a licensed care (LC) facility and other appropriate regulations as required. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (253) 661-4103 if you have any questions about this letter. Sincerely, (;)~ ~ Deb Barker Associate Planner Ene: FWCC section 22-1 e: Stanley Yntema, CDBG CoordinatDr Ann Gunther, Human Services Manager Mary Kate Martin, Building Offidal Karl Ommer, Lead Development Specialist Ale Doc. LD. '" 15&11 :~~Â:'~-' -=:...- ~ ~ THE COMPASS CENTER A Lutheran Organization Boa'" of Directors Shari Bilcon Verlon Brown Marty Dasl", Mike Halvorson Cheryl Hart Slacy Kern Kacey Kroeger Julie UghtlOOI Ron H. Lynch Slephen Nelson DeMar Sather Joseph Sidbury Heather Simmons John Sinkula Ed Stemple Peler Struck Thao Tiedt Paul Winlerslein Rick Friedhoff Executive Dlrectar 77 5. Washington Street Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 461-7835 Fax (206) 461-3874 COMMr'N~ßECENEDBY - f'VF.IOPMF'IT n"p~RTMENT OCT 0 9 2001 October 5, 2001 Ann Gunther, Human Services Manager City of Federal Way City Hall 33530 First Way South P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Dear Ms. Gunther: As you are aware the Compass Center has purchased a home in Federal Way that will be developed into an Oxford House. On October 17,2001 we are scheduled to meet with the Twin Lakes Community Council to discuss our housing program. We have spoken with Greg Eckland, the Twin Lakes Community Council Presìdent, and are formally on their agenda for the meeting on October 17th. The Community Council Meeting is schedule for 7:00 p.m. and will meet at the Twin Lake Association's meeting hall at 32228 - 22nd Ave S.W. We are formally requesting you or other appropriate staffftom the City of Federal Way to attend tills meeting with us. In the past, we have found it especially beneficial to have all parties, including funders, to be present at community meetings to answer questions and to demonstrate united support for the project. We hope you can join us at tills important meeting. I can be contacted at (206) 461-7835, ext. 30. Sincerely, p~~~ Janice Hougen Program Manager cc: Rick Friedhoff Mary Burki . A""""Way~ .'./ MaryKate Martin - FW: oxford house Page 1 of 1 From: To: Date: Subject: "Guza, Ken" <GuzaKW@dshs_wa.gov> = "'ma rykate. ma rti n@ci.federal-way.wa.us'" <ma rykate_marti n@ci.federal-way.wa.us> 01109/200208:09 AM FW: oxford house > ..-..Original Message..-.. > From: Guza, Ken > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:04 PM > To: 'marykate.martin@ci.federal.way.wa.us' > Subject: oxford house > > I am responding to your phone message of 1/7/02 about an Oxford House in > Federal Way and our phone conversation this morning. > > Oxford Houses are not licensed by the state. 'There are no staff or > services located in houses. House do not receive operating funds from the > state of Washington. > > Oxford House is a peer run husing model for people in recovery. Houses are > located in rental properties. Houses are found across the country in more > than 35 states- They operate using standarized operating manuals- An > imporatnt operating principle is that houses are good neighbors. The > physical maintenance of houses is important to being good neighbors. > ' > Houses are democratically run by the residents. Resident elect house > officers and they and hold weekly house meetings. Houses in an area houses > are organized into chapters which provide peer support between houses. > Oxford Houses chapters hold meetings and offer another level of peer > support- House residents and elected house officers participate in > workhops and conferences during the year as another way of supporting the > quality of individual houses. > > Oxford House are an important housing resource. Virtually every family is > affected by addiction. When people choose recovery they often need housing > following treatment. Lack of housing and returning to the old using > environment is a key risk factor for relapse. SuppoEting recovery is good > public policy and all of us benefit. > > file://C:\windows\TEMP\GW}OOOII.HTM r 0 I /09/2002 Application For Membership In Oxford House To be,l!cœp!~d 'In'¡¡n Oxford,House BI .app1~n( :,mùsL:comp~te '!icitll ,sides of. this application - and ~:Intervlewed- by thl tesidents of the particula!Oxford House1o'Y.Jhichclhe 'applicantls ..aPPlYing. The, resldei'(ts "of the :!IeuS!! tÏíen' :ýote 01 acœ~tanœ. . ~ !IO%-affinnative vo~ 'is 'n~ed'tó::be :acëè,~të(t <:arefuUy"~ad the ap¡JJiëation'and h"óriestiŸ'-åriSVierthl questions. Uvlng m,anOxford House" IS speClal.-and if you understand Its value I! can help-you achieve comfortable sobriet¡ without relapSe. 1. Print Name (Las~ FÌIS~ Middle) 3. Date of Birth Mon1h I Day rOM 2. Present address (Street) Check if treatment faålity 0 4. Phone Where Y 00 Can Be Reaå1ed Home ( ) City Stde Zip Wor1< ( ) 5. Are you an Alcoholic? 6.OateofYour 9. Us! dNgs you used adäldively: DYes DNo LastOrink? 7. Are you addicted to drugs? 8. Oate of last Dyes DNo drug use? 10. When did you attend your fits! MorNA meeting? 11. Hem many ANNA meeting do you OON attend ead1 week? 12. Do you want to stop drinking alcohol and using addictive drugs? 13. Are you employed? Dyes 0 No 0 Yes ONo If "yes" who is your employer? 14. Are you getting welfare or OCher non-job related i>come? 15. If you do not haw a job wi! you get one? 0 Yes 0 No If"yes"what? Dyes D No 1f"yes"vd1at job plans do you have? 17. What do you expect your rnonIhIy income 10 be next 16. What is your !!!!!!!!!!!l income right roNI month? $ $ 18. Marital status [Check One] 19. Do you have a meá¡caf dOctor? 0 Married, 0 Never Married, D Separated, D Divorced Dyes oNo If "yes" is! the doctor's name and phone nWtlber: - 20- Have you ever been to a treatment facility for alcoholism andIor drug addiction? 21. Do you take presaiption drugs? DYes 0 No If "yes" list the treatment provider, phone number and primary 0 Yes 0 No If "yes" list drugs and reason the drug counselor, if arr¡. has been prescribed. ", Please complete the other side of Ihis application. ... ". @ 2000 Oxford House World Services, 1010 Wayne Ayenue, Suite 400, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Telephone (301) 587-2916" Facsimile (301) 58~2 Side 2 22. Date of 1I1O\I81o? 0 Immediately 0 Other - W 'other' IsIthe date you wcuId want 10 -in, if acœpIed, and why the date Is In the fut1n rather than immediately. Date: - Reason: , 23. Have you ever lived in an Oxford House before? 0 Yes 0 No If "yes,' provide the name and location óf the Oxford House below and answer question 24. 24. [Answer this quesöon if the answer 10 question 23 was "yes.1 IIeß the previous Oxfont House lor the following reason: (checi< one) 0 relapse, 0 voluntarily, 0 othet reason(s) I, did 0 or do not 0 owe money 10 the Oxford House I left. If I äld owe money to the Oxford House llelt, I wiD agree 10 repay the money I owed 10 my former Oxford House. 0 Yes 0 No 25. Emeroencv Telephone Numbets. m.ist lam doctor. if YOU have one, + two familv membefS or friends Name and Address Relationship Telephone 1- 2- 3- 26. I realize that the Oxford House to which I am applying for residency has been established. in compliance with the conditions of § 2036 of the Federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, P.L. 100-690, as amended, which provides that federal money loaned to start the house teq~ires the house residents to (A) prohibit all residents from using any alcohol or illegal drugs, (8) expel any resident who violates such prohibition, (C) equally. share household expenses Including the monthly lease payment, among all residents, and (D) utilize democratic decision making within the group including inclusion in and expulsion from the group. - In accepting these terms, the applicant excludes himself or herself from the nonnal due process afforded by local landlord-tenant laws. 21. Use this space for additional relevantlnfonnatlon: 28. I have read all of the material on this application form including the limitations set forth in item 26. I have also answered each question honestly and want to achieve comfortable recovery from alcoholism and/or drug addiction without relapse. SIGNATURE: DATE: FOR USE BY.OXFORD HOUSE 0 ACCEPTED 0 NOT ACCEPTED MOVE IN DATE MOVE OUT DATE: HOUSE KEYS RlITURNED 0 YES 0 NO OUTSTANDING DEBTTO HOUSE $ DATE REPAID @ 2000 Oxford House World Services . Call 1-800-689-6411 for the Oxford House nearest you. ; SUGGESTED OXFORD HOUSE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS Open by explaining the Oxford Concept briefly and showing CBS "60 Minute" Tape. Being honest is the most important part of !he interview and that no particular answer will necessarily result in nonacceptance. NOTE TO INTERVIEWERS: DO LISTEN SHARE briefly your sameness. Put person at ease. Keep personal opinions to yourself. Ask questions if you want more information- DON'T Give advice about their recovery (you aren't a counselor). Discuss anything relating to house business or another member's problems. Discuss sexual preference, politics or religion. REMEMBER THAT THESE ARE ONLY GUIDELINES. IF THERE ARE ANY "GUT FEELINGS" THAT SOMETHING ELSE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED, NOW IS THE BEST TIME TO DO SO! 1. 2. Tell us a little about yourself (background). How did you get to this point in your recovery? How do you feel about your addiction? (Probe for denial - do they accept disease concept - anger - willingness - desire?) What is your plan for recovery? Can you provide us with a written copy? 3. 4. 5. Do you go to ANNA or other supportgroups? Have you identified your relapse triggers? What are they? Can you tell us behaviors that may indicate that you may be headed toward a relapse? If we see these behaviors in you, would you comply with a House vote for special requirements? 6. 7. 8. What is your job history? Do you have a profession, trade or skill? If so, what? Do you have reentry plans? Do you have an anger problem? What provokes the anger? (Probe for aggressive behavior, physical and domestic violence, isolation.) Have you ever attended anger management? 10. 11. ' 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Are you involved in a relationship (significant other, children, etc.)? Do you have any medical problems, including mental disorders the House should be aware of? If you are on medications, does the doctor prescribing the drugs' know of your addiction? Would you be responsible with your medications and keep them safely stored? Are you involved in any relationships that may be potentially disruptive to the House? . Do you have any legal issues pending (court dates, probation, etc.)? Can you handle being confronted and how is your temper? Can you confront others in a constructive manner? What do you feel you can offer Oxford House? SCENARIO: Your roommate and you become buddies. One day your rooml"(1ate tells you they have had a real down time (lost job, breakup with girlfriend, death in family, etc.), needed to unwind and had just one little toke or just a couple of drinks - but, of course, will never do it again. They don't want to leave the house and ask you to keep it a secret. How would you handle this? Why do you want to live in an Oxford House? Explain the rent and sobriety deposit: then - do you think you could handle your financial obligations to the House? Explain: House meetings and rules pertaining to them (include weekly, special, emergency). Do you have any prejudice issues? Examples: racial, sexual preference, etc. Would you have any problems performing. chores? Explain: that if accepted but not ready to move, the only way to assure that a bed will be available is to pay rent and sobriety deposit. If accepted, when could you pay and when could you move in? Explain: The voting procedures of accepting a new member (must be 80% of House membership). When they can expect an answer. Be sure to read aloud the disclaimer after line #20 (on application) and ask if they. understand it. . -j, ' INTERVIEW ETI Q UE~ The interview process within your house is a very important part of getting and keeping your house full and financially self-supporting. Although each house is autonomous, there are suggested interview guidelines that each house can follow. These guidelines were in the Presidents' packets handed out at last spring's House Officers Workshop. Your Outreach worker can supply your house with a copyif you don't already have one. Below,are a few suggestions that can help to make the interview process a more comfortable one for the house and the applicant. . Have the application and pen ready with a quiet place for the applicant to sit and fill it out. . Introductions: Each individual will introduce themselves. . Open with a brief explanation of the Oxford House concept. . Show the "50 Minutes. video. (Have house members sit and watch with applicant. This is also a good time to pass around the application for members to review.) . Have applicant speak briefly about himlherself. . Conduct your Q & A time. . Give a brief explanation of share of expenses,' sobriety deposits, house expectations, chores, fines, etc. . Ask applicant if they have any questions for the house. = Once the interview is over, make sure you have a contact phone number where the applicant can be reached. Explain that after they leave, the house members will discuss the interview and vote. Let them know that someone (usually the House President) will call to say if they have been accepted or not. In the event that the applicant was not accepted and they question why, explain to them that they did not get an 80% vote from the House members - then refer them to another house. ~HN-11ð-~ 1::>'::>'> DIaft HUJ COMPASS CENTER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OXFORD HOUSES OwnedÙ)': The Compass Center Managed by: The Compass Center and Oxford House 01/10102 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536] Draft JHN-l_&:I1<¿ l~;~,j r-.<J-) I. H\..U "'~'" PhysiCal Plant a. General Descriution: The program will consist of two single family residences. One residence will be located in south King County and one will be located in east King County. b. Number and size of un its: The Compass Center will purchase two single family homes, of about 3,000 square feet of living space per house. Each house will have six bedrooms, for a total of12 units. c. Accommodations: Accommodations will consist of 12 bedrooms. Eight of the 16 residents will share a room and 8 residents will have thcir own bedroom. d. Amenities; The houses.offer many amenities, ineluding fully equipped kitchens with up to date appliances. The houses will offer spacious living environments, including the shared common spaces (kitchen, living and dining rooms, bathrooms, yards, etc.) The houses will also be conveniently located near public transportation and shopping districts. e. Accessibility: The c;ompBss Cent.er will make an effort to secure houses that have at least one bedroom on the ground floor. 01110/02 THO 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8S36J JHN-l\:--~ l~:~~ Draft 1- HLIJ Tenant Popnlation a- HouseholdcomDosition: The house located in south King County will serve 8 men in recovery from drug/alcohol addiction. The east King County house will serve 8 women in recovery from drug/alcohol addiction. b. Demol!I1!Dhics: The persons to be served by this program are single individuals, 18 years or older, who are committed to remaining clean and sober. Prospective residents will have completed a treatment program and be alcohol and drug free at the time of application to a house. The Compass Center's and Oxford House's experience with other housing progråms demonstrates that a diverse group of people are served. We expect the . average age to be mid to late 30's, with many participants representing diverse ethnic! minority groups. The Compass Center and Oxford House will not discriminate against any prospective residents on the basis of race, religion, color, mañtal status, age, national origin; sexual orientation, or mental, physical, or sensory handicaps. c. Proeram canacitv: The WOgram capacity at any given time will be 16 participants. Eight will be composed of men and 8 will be composed of women. d. Estimated number of tenants housed Der vear: The program anticipates housing up to 2S individu.aIs per year; The program anticipates operating at full or near full capacity by maintaining contact with treatment programs, updating a web site, and utilizing the Oxford House hotline. e. Service to residents of unincoroorated Kin11: CountY: The Compass Center and OxfOId House will actively recruit elig¡òle program participants from unincorporated King County. The program will notifY treatment programs and services located in unincorporated King County about the program and actively encourage refena1s of eligible applicants. ll. Tenant Population a. Manaeement DhÏlosophv: Each house is a self-managed entity. All residents attend weekly house meetings and all matter ofbusincss is discussed: rental payment and expenses for the month; housekeeping matters; diSIUptive behavior of residents, if any; and progress toward maintaining sobriety. Oxforo House, Inc. provides a detailed operating manual that covers all aspects of managing a house - how to elect officers, what officers to elect and their duties, 01110/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536] JAN-1Ø-zø02 15:54 Draft HCD financial forms for preparing a house budget. instroctions on how to conduct a "house audit", tasks and forms for the chore coordinator, and much more. The Oxford House management philosophy is encompassed in a self-nul program that fosters individual responsibility, self-confidence, and success. Each member has an equal voice in all house affairs. The goal with each house is to create a supportive peer environment that will foster sobriety and self-reliance. b. Tvne ofhousine:: The Oxford House provides permanent housing. Residents are allowed to stay as long they choose; provided they adhere to the basic house rules. Average length of stay is about one year. c. SUÐ'Dort services nrovided: The Oxford House model operates on five distinct levels. The first level is the . national organizational level. It is at the national level that overall policies are developed and documents such as the operating manual are prepared. The national organization "charters" new houses as a way of acknowledging a new house" agreement to operate under the national program guidelines. The second level is the State Board of Directors composed of the ten state chair persons ftom each of the ten chapters and three alumni. Their function is to oversee the work of the chapters. The tlrird level of operation for Oxford Houses is the "chapter" affiliates. Each house is linked to a group of about 10 houses. Chapter members meet monthly to discuss house operations and to provide moral and technical support as needed, especially to new houses. . The third level is operation of the individual house following the self- management approach. This approach is the foundation of the Oxford House concept and the basis for the program's level of success in helping residents learn and practice the behaviors necessary to maintaining a clean and sober life style. If there is any perception of a potential relapse, residents are quick to challenge fellow residents as to how their recovery is progressing. The State's Division of Alcoholism ãnd Substance Abuse (DASA) provides the fifth level. The State pays 3 outreach workers to nurture the smooth operation of existing Oxford Houses and to foster the development of new houses. The sixth level is the link to existing recovery services in the community. Many residents of Oxford Houses attend AA and/or NA meetings. Others seek continued treatment services ftom qualified chemical dependency providers. Each resident is encouraged by their housemates to pUISue a program ofrecovery that will work for that particular individ~al: 01/10/02 THU 16: 49 [n/RX NO 8536) . . JHI'I-llð-ðO"'¿ 1::>-:>4 Draft Hl..U UL Management and Operation of the Premises. a. Management entity and staffing: Management Entity: The Compass Center will be the owner of the properties. The Compass Center will enter into a contractual agreement with Oxford Houses of Washington to operate the program. This contract will be reviewed and updated on a regular basis. Staffing: Compass Center Transitional Housing Program Manager: The Compass Center Executive Director: The Compass Center Executive Director will act on behalf of the Compass Center to ensure that the real and personal property of the project will be maintained in a manner that will enhance its economic value and prolong its utility. The Compass Center Executive Director will supervise the Transitional Housing Program. Manager who will administer the overall operations of the property in a manner consistent with the policies and procedures set forth in this plan and approved by the Executive Director. TransiJiøllal Housing Program Manager: . The Transitional Housing Program Manager will supexvise property sCIVÍces for the project. The Transitional Housing Program Manager will be responsible for supervising The Compass Center staff, together with Oxford Houses of Washington. will administer the day to day operations, including maintenance and fiscal oversight, of the property in a manner consistent with the lease and . procedures set forth in this plan.. The Transitional Housing Program. Manager will use her best efforts to ensure the sub-contractee (Oxford House) will provide residents of the program prompt, efficient, courteous and quality service. and to assist the Executive Director to ensure that the real and personal property of the Compass Center will be . maintained in a manner that will enhance its economic value and prolong its utility. General authority and responsibüittes The TransitionßJ. Housing Program Manager, in conjunction with Oxford Houses of Washington. is responsible for the fonnulation of all policies necessary to provide effective and efficient administration of the property. 01110/02 THU 16: 49 [TX/RX NO 85361 ~AN-1Ø-2ØØ2 15: 55 Draft HCD """""""" Compass Center Buildin Maintenance Tasks: Maintain safe and efficient operation of all electrical, mechanical, plumbing, - safe and sarti ui ment Monitor and coordinate maintenance repair services Regularly inspect building, grounds, and ui ment Maintain records on all wolk perfonned, and on all ital ui ment MaintaincompIete set of "as built" dra~s showing all structural, mechanical and electrical s Answer and respond to resident general fire alarm and em enc situations Oxford Oxford nn to Perform Task: Compass Center/ Oxford Compass Center Compass Center! Oxford Compass Center Compass Center Compass Center! Oxford Maintenance Supervisor The Maintenance Supervisor shall respond to maintenance and ground needs as necessaI)' to maintain safety of the structures and carry out policies set forth in this Management Plan and the directives of the Transitional Housing Program Manager and the Executive Director. General Autho~' and R onsihilities Tasks: Notify proper. person in event of an emergency situation requiring immediate atientio such as lumbin securi etc. Ensure jai!itorial duties are perfonned a scheduled basis to assure proper cleanliness and safe Respond to maintenance complaints, iden~ and correct the problem or schedule the air work Know the location and operation ofmajor utility and telephone lines, meters, and controls Oxford Compass Center! Oxford Compass Center! Oxford 01110/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536) -!R-I-10-2ØØ2 15: 55 Draft HCD 29~ I-'.W Monitor and coordinate maintenance. pest control. and repair services done by vendors aDd contractors Ensure safe and efficient operation of all eleètricai, mechanical, plumbing, safety, and sani e ui ment Compass Center! Oxford Compass Center! Oxford Resilknts Residents shall comply with all rules and regu1ations now established or hereafter duly adopted or modified by Oxford Houses of Washington. Alterations and Repairs: Residents shall make minor repairs such as, but not limited to, replacing light bulbs in common areas and replacing washers in leaking faucets. Residents shall make no changes, major repairs, or alterations of the premises or equipment, including the application of wall paper or paint . without prior approval ftom the Compass Center or Oxford Houses of Washington. Grounds Upkeep: Residents shall ensure that planting beds are weeded, litter picked up, and that yard and planting beds are maintained and watered. ApplÙ!nces and Equipment: Residents shalI ~ only in reasonable manner all elec1rical, plumbing, sanitaIy, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and other facilities and equipment. and shall not use any apparatus for heating except that provided without prior written consent by the¡ Compass Center. Qeaning Premises: Residents shall clean the premises and all equipment on a daily basis. Codes: Residents shall comply with all obligations imposed upon residents by applicable provisions of environmental and bonsing còdes materially affecting health and safety. Cond,Ud: Resident shalI not, nor allow other persons who are on the premises with resident's consent to conduct themselves in a manner which will distrub other's peaceful enjoyment of their accommodations. Resident's behavior shall be conducive to maintaining the neignborhood in a decent, safe, and sanitary condition. Damages: Residents shall report to Oxford, who will notify the Compass Center, if necessary, any breakage. damage, or need for repairs to the premises or equipment therein, and shall promptly report any unsafe or unsanitary conditions in the building and/or grounds which may lead to damage or injury. Fire Preventüm: No hazardous material shall be kept on the premises. 01/10/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536) Draft JAN-ll11-2ØØ2 15:55 t"."'" HCD ~ Inspections: The Compass Center and Oxford have the ñght to inspect the houses, including individual units, at any given time. Resident's will be given at least three days notice prior to any general inspections of the house. The Staff of The Compass Center further reserves the ñght of access to premises for repairs, alteration, improvement, supplying of services or emergencies. Locks: Residents shall not install additional or different locks or gates on any doors or windows of the dwelling without the written permission oCthe Transitional Housing Program Manager. Maintenance: Residents shall keep their unit in a clean, orderly, and safe condition. Parking: Parking will be allowed in assigned, designated areas only. . Pets: Residents shall not keep cats, dogs, or other pets on the premises (except service animals used by persons with a disability) without the written consent of the Transitional Housing Program Manager. Smokbrg: Smoking is not pennitted inside the premises. b. Tenant selection and eligibility detennination: Screening Procedures: . Interested individuals must get an application from a house or a treatment agency. . . Complete the application and submit to the house. . Call the house to schedule an interview appointment. . Show up on time for an interview by members of the house. . It takes an 80 pexcent "yes" vote by house members to be admitted. Eligibility Criteria: . Completion of in patient treatment program, or . 1 ()...day detoxification with an intensive outpatient program,or . 30 days of being clean and sober. . . Each individual must be willing to accept house rules. . Each individual must be able to pay his/ller share of house expenses. . Each individual must have the desire to work on his/ller recovery. . Applicants must be eighteen years of age or older. . Applicants must be at or below 50% area median income as published annually by HUD. c. Marketimr D1an: The Compass Center and Oxford House will comply with affinnative marketing practices and Fair Housing regulations in the outreach and selection of residents . 01/10/02 THU 16: 49 [TI/RX NO 8536] . DIaft JAN-1Ø-2ØØ2 15:56 HCD Compass Center and Oxford House will comply with the provisions ofFed&a1. State and local laws including. but not limited to Title VI of the Civil Rights Aet of 1964, ExecutiveOrdcr 11036, and Title vm of the 1968 Civil Rights Act prohibiting discrimination in housiñg on the grounds of race, color, creed, sex, national origin or sexual orientation. d. Rent for the nrernises: Rent sChedule: The Compass Center and Oxford House are committed to providing housing for individuals at 50% or below median area income for fifty years. Residents of the program will initially pay $280.00 a month for their share of rent, utilities., and house and chapter dues. Rents will incx:menta1ly be increased as needed. ProceQ.ure for detennining rent: Aß part of the application process, incomes of prospective residents will be . verified. Rent Collection: Rents for the houses will be collected directly by house members- The two house officers responsible for rent collection are the treasurer and the comptroller. These positions are rotated amongst house members. e. Rules for oneration of the premises and enforcement nrocedures: f. Procedure for dealine with tenant corno1aints: g. Descrintion of security and ememencv nlans: . Firê eXtingUishers and posted evacuation plans . Smoke detectors in all common areas and bedrooms . Eip.ergency numbers posted by the telephone . Semi-annual house inspections to monitor safety and system checks. h. Maintenance and I'CDak: . It is the policy of The Compass Center that the properties be maintained and repaú'ed in accordance with safe and sanitaIy conditions and local codes. Maintenance and repairs will be the responsibility of Compass Center or its designated sub-contraetor. All equipment and machinery will be inspected and serviced in accordance with manufactures specifications and locals codes. Compass Center will prepare and implement a schedule for preventive maintenance activities. Compass Center may contract with qualified independent contractors for the maintenance and repair of all building systems and for extraordinary repairs beyond the capabilities of the in-house staff. 01/10/02 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 8536) JRN-I0-2ØØ2 15:56 HCD 29b1d~ 1-'.11 Draft Facilitating maintenance and repairs will be the responsibility of the Executive Director and the Transitional Housing Program Manager. All equipment and machinery will be inspected and serviced in accordance with manufactUrerS specifications and local codes. Minor repairs and preparation ofvacant rooms will be camed out by the residents of the houses. Any repairs or equipment failure of a serious nature will be reported by the residents to the appropriated Compass Center staff. Service requests of residents will be systematically and promptly responded to by Compass Center staff as the situation wamnts and the circumstances permit. Emergency requests will be received and serviced on a 24 hour basis. Records of all such request shall be kept 1- Description onon!!: tenn maintenance plan and maintenance reserve fund: The Compass Center is committed to maintaining the.properties for at least 50 . years. To this end, a rigorous maintenance plan will be closely followed. The maintenance plan will include the following: . Semi-annUlll house in.mections: The maintenance supervisor will semi- annually, thoroughly inspect the premises for puxposes of maintenance up- keep. Types of inspection include: Exterior. roof; gutters, downspouts, concrete walls, parking areas, signs, fences, landscaping. ~ cleanliness of common areas and hallways, carpeting, smoke detectors, emergency lights, storage areas, laundIy. Units: living room, dining area, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms, closets. . Ref!Ular fcheduled maintenance: The maintenance supervisor will coordinate regular scheduled mainœn"nce, including fire safety equipment inspection, unit painting and furnace cleaning. . Lon'{ Term Maintenanœ and Reserves FlUId: A separate maintenance reserve fund will be established for each house. Deposits into the reserve accounts will be made monthly ftom property income. Please see the attached facilities operating budget 01/10/02 THU 16: 49 [TI/RX NO 8536] JR-I-1ß-2ØØ2 15: 57 HCD ~ t"'.l¿ Leas"e Agreement The parties to this lease.agreement dated the day of September 2001 are The Compass Center, A Lutheran Organization, herein called Landlord, and Oxford House, a Wash~ngton non- profit corporation, herein called Tenant. Landlord is the owner of the residence commonly known as 31411 42nd Place SW, Federal Way Washington 98023, that is legally described as Lot 33, plat of Twin Lakes #6 recorded in yolume 101 at page 33 of plats, records of King County, Washington. The above-described propeny is herein called the Leased Premises Landlord desires to lease the Leased Premises to Tenant. Tenant desires to lease the Leased Premises from Landlord. Tenant will use the Leased Premises to provide affordable, clean and sober hoUsing, for people in recovery using the Oxford House self managed model. Now Therefor in return for the mutual covenants contained in this Lease Agreement the parties agree as follows. I.TERM The tenn of this lease shall be ten (10) years. The lease term shall commence on the first day of the month following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Leased Premises. The parties estimate t1üs date to be on or around March 1,2002. The lease tenn, unless extended as provided below, shall terminate ten years after its inception- Tenant shall have the right to extend the term ofthis lease for eight (8) option terms offive (5) years each. Tenant shall, as a condition ofits right to extend the lease term, provide Landlord with written notice of Tenant's election to extend the term of the lease. Said notice shall be given at least one year prior to the expiration of the then current lease term. 2.RENT Tenant agrees to pay, without demand, to Landlord as monthly rent for the first tWo years of the lease term an amount of money equal to the sum of the following items: Management fee of$375.00, insurance reimbursement fee of$133.00, maintenance fee 0£$300.00, and a replacement reserve deposit amount of $1 05.00. Rent for each succeeding year of the Lease Term shall be adjusted by the parties to reflect the increase or decrease in insurance costs and maintenance costs so that Landlord receives its..management fee on a ¡;let basis. The dollar amount of the management fee component of the rent formula shall be adjusted every five years during the Lease Term. The amount of the adjustment shall be an amount equal to the increase or decrease in the Consumer Price Index increase for the previous five-year period. 3.Use of Leased Premises The Leased Premises shall be used by Tenant to operate a residential home for people who are in recovery. The house shall be occupied by not more than eight persons. Residents shall be 18 years of age or older, clean and sober at the time of their entry into the house. The Leased Premises shall be managed in the typical Oxford House self managed modeL Tenant acknowledges that occupants of the house must be income qualified to be residents of the Leases Premises. Residents may not have incomes that exceed 50% of the median income for residents of 01/10102 THU 16:49 [TX/RX NO 85361 ;rAN-1ø-2ØØ2 15: 57 Hen 296Ø229 P.13 King County. Tenant shall be responsible to verify that residents are income qualified. Tenant shall use-the Leased Premises for residential purposes. No part of the Leased Premises shall be used for the purpose of carrying on any business, profession or trade of any kind. 4.Assignment Tenant shall not assign all or any interest in tills lease without the prior written consent of the Landlord. Any purported assignment without the consent of Landlord shall at Landlord's option terminate this Lease. 5.Condition ofthe Leased Premises Tenant stipulates that it has examined the Leased Premises, including the grounds and all improvements. Landlord and Tenant have agreed upon certain improvements to be made to the Leased Premises. These include but are not limited to a new roof, barrier free accesses, plumbing improvements and construction to enable the Leased Premises to accommodate eight adults. The agreed upon improvements will be detailed in plans and specifications prepared by the project architect retained by Landlord. Prior to the commencement of construction both Landlord and Tenant will approve the plans and specifications in writing. After the construction has been completed and a certificate of occupancy issued by the appropriate gove=ent authorities the Leased Premises will be accepted by Tenant and rent will commence on the first day of the next month following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. 6. Alterations and Improvements Tenant shall make no alterations or additions to the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of the Landlord. Any aIterations or additions shall remain part of the Leased Premises at the expiration or sooner termination of the lease and be the property of Landlord. 7. Maintenance and Repair Landlord shall be responsible for the repairs to the structural portions of the roof, walls and foundation of the Leased Premises. Landlord shall also repair the underground portion of the water and sewer lines that service the Leased Premises- At the commencement of each option term of this lease, Landlord and Tenant shall inspect the walls, floor coverings and appliances in the leased premises to determine if any of these needs to be replaced. Funds held by Landlord in the replacement reserve account shall be used to purchase and install needed items. Tenant will during the entire term of tills lease, at its expense maintain the Leased Premises in a neat, clean and sanitary condition. Tenant shall keep the electric and plumbing fixtUres in the Leased Premises in good order and repair, keep-the furnace clean, keep the walks free from debris, the lawn mowed and maintain the entire yard in a neat and presentable condition. Tenant shall be responsible for the cost to repair all damage that is caused by the misuse, waste or neglect of Tenant's residents, their guests, agents or visitors to the Leased Premises. 8. Dangerous Materials Tenant shall not keep on the Leased Premises any article or thing of a dangerous, inflammable, or explosive character that might unreasonably increase the danger of fire on the Leased Premises or that would be considered hazardous, or extra hazardous by a responsible insurance company standard. 01110/02 THU 16: 49 [TX/RX NO 8536] JF'toI-l0-2002 15:58 HCD ~ "'.14 9. Animals Tenant shall not allow any domestic or other animals to live or remain on the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of the Landlord. 10. Utilities Tenant shall be responsible for all utilities used on the Leased Premises during the term of the lease including but not limited to, water, sewer, gas. electricity, telephone, cable, or heating oil. Tenant will at Landlord's request provide evidence that the utility bills are being paid on a current basis. 11. Inspection Landlord shal1 have the right to enter the Leased Premises for the purpose of inspecting the Leased Premises. Landlord shall provide notice to Tenant prior to conducting the inspections. The inspections shall be scheduled at times that reduce the impact on residents of the Leased Premises. 12. Default In the event that either Landlord or Tenant does not perfonn their obligations under the terms of this lease, then the non-defaulting party shal1 give notice of default to the party who has failed to perform its obligation. The notice shall state the default that has occurred and provide a cure period of not less than ten (10) calendar days. In the event that the default has not been cured during the notice period then the non defaulting party shall be entitled to all of the remedies provided by the laws of the state of Washington including: damages, specific performance, and termination of this lease. 13. Attorneys Fees In the event that either Landlord or Tenant is.required to retain the services of an attorney to enforce their rights under the terms of this lease, then the prevailing party in the litigation or other court proceeding shall be entitled to receive as additional damages a sum equal to reasonable attorneys f~ incurred. 14. Holdover by.Tenant In the event Tenant remains in possession of the Leased Premises with the written or implied consent of the Landlord after the natural expiration of this lease, a new month-to-monthtenancy shall be created between Landlord and Tenant. The new tenancy shall be subject to all of the terms of the lease exCept for tenn of the tenancy. Either party may terminate the new month-ta-month tenancy on thirty days written notice to the other party. IS.Surrender of the Premises At the termination of the lease tenn Tenant shall surrender the Leased Premises to Landlord in a good and cl~ condition. The premises shall be in the same general condition as when the leased term commenced with an allowance being made for the normal wear and tear on the Leased Premises dU(ing the term of the lease. 16. Management Plan Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the Leased Premises and one additional residential site will have been acquired pursuant to very favorable financial terms made available to the parties through the State of Washington, King County and local government institutions- These financing sources have particular regulatory requirements that must be complied with on a long-terni basis as a condition to receiving the purchase money funds on such a favorable basis. These requirements are contained in long-term agreements between the Compass Center and the King County Department ofCommtmÌty and HÜman Services Housing and Community 01/10102 rnu 16: 49 [TX/RX NO 8536) JAN-10-2ØØ2 15:58 HCD ~ 0-'.1::> " Development Department and the State ofWlfS1ùngton Department of Community Trade and Economic Development Office of Community Development Housing Finance Unit. Memorandums of the agreements encumber the Leased Premises and one additional residential property to be acquired. This lease agreement is subordinate to the tenns and conditions of the agreements with the State ofWaslñngton and King County. Tenant will receive a copy of the applicable contracts and agrees to operate the Leased Premises in a manner that complies with the requirements contained in the contracts. Pursuant to the tenns of the .funding contracts the Leased Premises is to be operated in accordance with a Management Plan approved by King County. Landlord has pro"ided Tenant with a copy of the draft plan for the Leased Premises. Landlord and Tenant will review the Management Plan with appropriate government officials to adopt a plan that is approved by King County, local government fimders and the parties. The property shall be operated in accordance with the approved Management Plan. 17. Noticè All notices to be given pursuant to the tenns of this lease shalI be given in writing and mailed to the other party by regular mail and by certified mail return receipt requested with postage pre paid. Notice shall be deemed received on the date actually received. Notice shall be given at the addresses provided by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS LEASE ON THE DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2001. LANDLORD TENANT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. ) COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before_me, . known to be the . of the Compass Center, a Washington non-profit corporation, the corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the fice and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that slhe was authorized to execute the same. DATED: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington 01110102 THU 16:49 IU/RX NO 8SJ6 J~lØ-2ØØ2 15: 59 HCD ~ t".lb reSiding in the county of My appointment expires 01/10/02 THU 16: 49 [TX/RX NO 8536] '" Oxford House Locations in King County .... Legend: Oxford House Location Scale: 1 to 217560 1 Inch equals 18130 Feet 0 5 Miles ~- I !:l N ThIs map Is Intended lor use .. a cnøhlc8lrepresonlationONLY. The CItY of Federal Way makes no WlI/T8I1ty.. \0 Its accuracy. ,~ , ., 1999 State Evaluation of Washington Network of Oxford Houses Survey Respondents: 1997: 247 [69% response] 1998: 323 [72% response) Number of Washington Oxford Houses: 1997: 50 1998: 65 [30% Increase] Number of Recovery Beds 1997: 436 1998: 546 [25% Increase) A verage Age 1997: 37.1 1998: 36.8 [4 months younger) This report compares the profik and recovery data between of the two survey periods -- October/November 1996 compared to Oclober/November 1998. In the earlier period. 247 residents of the Washington Stale Oxford Houses completed the basic Oxford House questionnoire developed by the late William Spillaine, Ph.D. in 1987'. In the most r«em period. 323 current residents of Washington State Oxford Houses completed (II idenlicoI questionnaire.. When the 1997 "Profile and Evaluation of Waslùngton State Network of Oxford Houses," was published in March, 1997, there were 50 Oxford Houses. By the end of 1998 that number had increased 30% for a total of 65 Waslùngton State Oxford Houses -- 53 for men; 12 for women. Total number of recoyery beds increased year-end to year-end from 436 to 546 -- slightly more than 25%. In the latest survey period (October/November, 1998) there were a total of 493 available Oxford House recovery beds in the state. Excluding 41 vacancies during the survey period, 72% of residents completion a survey [323]. Average Age of Residents Waslùngton State Oxford House residents in 1998 haye an average age of 36.8 -- a slight decrease in the average age of 37.06 in 1997. The following figure shows the age distribution: 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 I!I Age Ranges 18-29 29-40 40-50 60-70 50-60 As in 1997, nearly 40% of the Oxford House residents in the state fell into the age 29 to 40 category. I Evaluation published in March- 1997 as "1997 Evaluation of Washington Slate Network of Oxford Houscs_" Monthly Resident Income: 1997:$1082 1998:$1322 [30% increase] Percent of Residents Employed: 1997: 58% 1998: 67 % 115% IncreaseI Percent of Residents Who are Veterans: 1997: 30.7% 1998: 27.2% [12% decrease] Percent of Residents Who are Women 1997: 18.6% 1998: 21.9% [17% Increase] Length of Current Sobriety: 1997: 12.6 months 1998: 17.1 months [35% Increase] 2 Economic Status of Residents There are several unique characteristics that account for the success of Oxford House. One is that the houses are self- supported. The recovering individuals themselves pay an equal share of household expenses including repayment of any loans used to originally establish the house. The average weekly share of household expenses, including start-up loan repayment, in the Washington State Oxford Houses is $67.62- The avernge monthly income of the Washington State Oxford House residents is $1322. This is an increase of 30% over the monthly resident income at the end of 1997. This increase is, in part, attributable to the increased percentage of Washington State Oxford House residents who are employed- In'the 1997 evaluation only 58% were employed at the end of 1996 when the sulVey was completed. The percent of residents employed during the OctoberlNovember, 1998 survey period was 67% - a 25% increase in the number of residents employed.1 This "self-help" feature of the Oxford House system of operation makes Oxford Houses very low cost for the taxpayer or tlùrd party payees. In addition, the fact that each resident pays an equal share of expenses permits the democratic nature of Oxford Houses to flourish. No individual is paying a bigger share of household costs than any other indiyidual which helps to insure that every resident has an equal say in how an Oxford House operates. The income of Oxford House residents not only pays the cost of operating 65 recoyery houses witlùn the state but adds value to the state's overall economic health. The chart on the following page shows the return on the $150,000 state expense to proyide technical assistance to the Oxford Houses in the state. The first bar represents the state expense for technical service. The second bar represents the amount residents pay themselyes to keep the 65 Oxford, House opernting. The tlùrd bar shows total earned income of residents and the last bar shows the social security and Medicare tax paid by the residents. The importance of the economic turn around can best be understood when measured against where Oxford House residents were before moving into an Oxford House. In 1 In Washington State it is possible for newly recovering individuals to receive a state payment following treatment. This payment of approximately $350 provides a six month transition income for individuals in early recovery. The existence of this payment accounts for a significantly lower percentage of employed individuals among the Washington State Oxford House residents than among residents in other states. " "- Dollars and Sense For Washington State Taxpayers Resident's Aggregate Earnings: $8,661,744 Resident's Aggregate Payment to Operate Washington State Oxford Houses: $1,919,867 Residents Earning Going To FICA Tax: $1,268,945 State Government Expenses To Provide Technical Services To Start Houses and To Keep Existing Houses On Track: $150,000 Ratio of State Annual Cost to Resident's Annual Cost to operate the Network of Washington Oxford Houses: 1: 13 nearly 40% of Oxford House residents had either been homeless or living in a state supported institution. Frequency Distribution tor LAST LIVED The table at the left . eo.n Percent shows where Oxford House residents lived immediately before moving into an Oxford House. As a matter of fact 68.8% of Oxford House residents had been homeless for an average period of six months sometime prior to their admission to an Oxford House -- about the same as the 67% who reported homelessness in the 1997 eyaluation. APARTMENT OW>ED HOUSE RENTED HCXJSE RENTED ROOM JAIL MENTAL HOSPITAL VA HOSPITAl HAlF-WAY HOUSE HOMElESS Total 78 24.<5 37 11,60 45 14,11 39 12.23 20 6.27 8 2.51 13 4,08 B 2.51 71 22.26 319 100,00 Comparison of Resident Share of Expenses With State Expense and Amount Paid In FICA Tax ".000.000 ŒJ ",000.000 S7,000.OOO $0,000.000 SS,OOO.OOO S4,000.OOO U.ooO.OOO sz.ooO,OOO $1.000,000 so S""""M' """""'-' T....- FlCAT.. Oxford Hous~residents in the State of Washington, as in other jurisdictions, assume responsibility for their own recovery and pay the expenses of living in an Oxford House. The yarious state reyolving loan funds established under §2036 of PLlQO- 690, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, provide the start-up loans for groups of six or more recovering alcoholics and drug addicts to establish a self-run, self-supported recovery house. However, Washington State has gone a step further and provides technical assistance to teach new Oxford House members how to operate a house and to help organize the 65 houses in the state into mutually supportive Chapters and even a statewide organization. Unlike, most states, Washington State has expended $150,000 or more each year in order to 3 Military Veterans In Washington State Oxford Houses While the percentage of veterans slightly decrease from 30.7% in the 1997 evaluation to 27.2% this year, the absolute number of yeterans increase from 81 to 85. This is because of the 25% increase in the number of available Oxford recovery beds in the state. During the last year Oxford House central services has developed a number of Oxford Houses in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina devoted exclusiyely to the recovering veteran population. Several of the Washington State Oxford Houses, located near Veteran's Hospitals, seem to of a similar nature. The Washington State Oxford Houses may want to further develop this type of Oxford House, I t is just the same as any other Oxford House but is located near V A treatment and reaches out to the recovering Veteran peer group. The survey data shows that the 85 Waslúngton State veterans had the same outcomes as all other residents of Washington Oxford Houses. The average age was slightly higher; i.e., ayerage 43 vears versus 34 for those without military service. 4 provide the hands-on assistance to enable houses to work well. Their expenditures have reap great benefits. During 1998, for example, the men and women living in Washington State Oxford HOUieS expended $13 for every $1 spent by the state in order to pay the household expenses for the 65 Oxford Houses in the state. From another perspective it is fair to ask what it would have cost the state to have operated enough traditional halfway houses to accommodate the 546 recovering individuals living in Waslúngton State Oxford Houses. At the generally accepted national figure for annual costs per traditional halfway house beds, the cost to the state for housing 546 recovering individuals in traditional halfway houses would have been $ I2,558,000! That is about 84 times the amount the state spent to establish and maintain the Washington State Network of 65 Oxford Houses. Women in Washington Oxford Houses The percentage of Oxford House residents in the state who are women increase from 18.6% to 21.9 % -- a 17% increase betWeen 1997 and 1999. Today, nearly 100 of the 546 Oxford recovery beds in the state are for women. The women with an average age of 33.7 are four younger than the men who haye an average age of 37.7. The ayerage monthly income for the men [$1,405] is significantly higher than for the women [$1,017]. Several Oxford Houses for women in the State of Washington accept a few women along with their children. It appears that tlús proyides a unique opportunity for many women because most long-term residential programs do not accept women with clúldren. Neither the 1996 nor 1998 survey's quantified the extent of the women with clúldren residence. The average age of women employed was 35 while those not employed had an average age of 33. Just the opposite relationship oCage and employment applied to male residents -- unemployed had an average age of 40 while. employed had an average age of 35. A number of older men in houses who have retired explains the differences in average age when compared to employment Education Level of Oxford House Residents Alcoholism and drug addiction are egalitarian diseases and cut across the population irrespectiye of background including educational attainment The current residents in Waslúngton State Oxford Houses have educational attainment ranging from , . " Jail Time 1997: 77% 1998: 79% Addiction - Alcohol 1997: 52% 1998: 48% Addiction - Drugs 1997: 47% 1998: 53% AAINA Meetings Per Week 1997: 3.75 1998: 3.55 Plus Counseling 1997: 47.1 % 1998: 44.4% No Show 12 Step Meetings 1998: 8% 3rd grade to post-graduate school. The average educational attainment is 126 years. This is a little lower than the level of educational attainment among Oxford House residents in some other states but not significantly so. Slate Yo... of School Mean Educational Altaiomenl By Stale TX KS MO SC CT WA VA 12JJO 1297 12.67 12.99 1222 126 1236 Jail Time Like Oxford House residents in most other states a significant number of Washington State Oxford House residents have served jail time -- 79.6%. This is slight Júgher than the 1996 percentage of 77%. The dUJation of jail time is somewhat less on average than it was two years earlier - 13 months versus 14 months. The average number of time arrested, however, is slightly greater -- 4.7 versus 3.8. Drug Addiction Compared To Alcoholism Only For the first time profiles have been collected of Washington State Oxford House residents the number of drug addicts is greater than the number of individuals addicted to alcohol only. In 1996,52% of the residents were solely alcoholics; in 1998 47.8% were solely alcoholics. Conversely, in 1996, 47% were addicted to crack, cocaine or heroin in addition to alcohol; in 1998 that percentage jumped to 522%. Once again there is no difference in relapse rate between those addicted solely to alcohol or those addicted to drugs in addition to alcohoL Both resident groups report a relapse rate of just under 20%. Recovery Treatment Recoyery treatment is measured by the number of 12-step meeting residents attend each week and the percentage of residents who attend counseling sessions in addition to 12-step meetings. In 1996 the percentage of individuals who attended weekly counseling sessions in addition to 12-step meetings was 47.1%. In 1998,44.4% attended counseling sessions in addition to 12-step meetings. The average number of AA or NA 12-step meetings attended each week was 3.75% in 1996 and 3.55% in 1998. The difference is so small that it is not significant Both in 1996 and 1998 the Washington State Oxford House residents attend more weelcly meetings than the ayerage AA or NA member -- 3.5 versus 2.1. It is of some concern that a little oyer 8% [28J of the residents attend no l2-step meetings. (See side bar next page.) 5 Why Attend AA or NA Meetings There is no magic bullet to "cure" alcoholism or drug addiction - only true behayior change. It takes time, peer support and hard work to change behavior. Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) are self-help groups which consist of speaker or discussion meetings. The recovering persons at the meetings talk about their own addiction and the ways they have become comfortable in staying away from the first drink or first drug use which triggers the compulsive craving and use of the drug. The "Twelve Steps" are a progressive set of actions that each individual must take to change his or her own behayior. This requires acceptance of the need of behavior change. Talking about one's own behayior and listening to other's discuss their behavior provides 'the conditioning needed to bring about and to re- enforce behavior change. Oxford House is called by some "AA or NA in a house" because peer support is available 24 hours a day. However, the indiyidual who does not get into the habit of going to AA or NA does not prepare well for the day he or she moves out of an Oxford House. 6 The "Missing Link" Because Oxford House allows an individual to heal from addiction at his or her own pace, it becomes a missing link in the treatment protocol for alcoholism and drug addiction. Usually, an alcoholic or drug addict gets detoxified, receives some treatment (education about the disease and motivation 'to change behavior) and goes back to where he or she came from. Since the "cure" is behavior change, it is difficult to become comfortable with the new behavior in the old living environment How do we know this to be true? Look at the past attempts at sobriety. Prior Treatment Record of Washington Stale Oxford House ResidenlB (Percentage) Number 0/ Sobriety Tries WA 1996 18.3 26.3 'ZlD ŒJS 18.9 WA 1996 15.9 20,6 29.6 14.0 19.9 Ore Two Three to Five Six to Ten Ma-than 10 Nearly two-thirds of us (64%) have had prior treatment three or more times. One in fiye of us have been through a residential treatment program ten times or more. We know, by experience that going back to where we came from does not work until we become comfortable enough with clean and sober behayior to stay clean and sober. Oxford Houses provide that time we need to become comfortable with sobriety. Does Oxford House Work? In the 1998 survey, 86% of the Washington State Oxford House residents said that Oxford House was "Very Important" to their recovery. (Only I % claimed Oxford House was "insignificant" with respect to their own recovery.) When asked if they would recommend Oxford House to another recoyering alcoholic or drug addict, 97% responded that they would. At least the residents of Oxford House believe that Oxford House makes a difference. Objectiyely, when one looks at the cohort group having been to treatment ten times or more, it is interesting to note that the 65 individuals in that cohort haye more than 20 months current sobriety. In each case that the "current sobriety" is the longest period of abstinence eYer put together by members of that group. For them, and many others, Oxford House has become the "missing link" for moving from addiction to comfortable sobriety without relapse. ODD :" " , HOUSE EXPECTATIONS The following list of House Expectations was devised and agreed upon by a unanimous vote of the residents of an Oxford House on December 1, 1993. The list consists of common-sense, everyday guidelines that help all of us. to be aware of the need to respect each other. These guidelines are always subject to be revised as different circumstances arise, with a majority vote at regular or emergency House Meeting. At some of these we balked.........butL...... 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. First (30) thirty days; no overnights outside the house Except (1) one night a week with a reasonable curfew of 11 pm weeknights and 1 am on weekends. House members will discuss any extended overnights outside the House. Overnight guests: (2) Two nights a weed with the exception of house members' children. (Children are allowed anytime if discus,ed with House members.) If, for any reason you get a prescribed narcotic, it must be brought to the attention of the house. No self-medicating - This is the same as USING! If you are prescribed medicines by your doctor, you must stay on those medicines until further proof from your doctor that he has taken you off the medicine- Medicines are to be keptin your living area and out of view of other House members. Attend Outside Support Group Meetings weekly. Respect your house mates personal boundaries by treating them as you would like to be treated. Do not use anyone's personal items without permission. Mark ALL your food items with your initials. Taking someone elses food without permission constitutes theft and will be dealt with by the House residents. Bedroom areas are private and should be respected. If you make a mess, clean it up! including wiping bathroom tub, sinks, mirrors, etc....kitchen crumbs, spills and any other items such as microwave, dishes, etc. Personal items should be kept in their proper places (Le.: newspapers, magazines, ashtrays, mail, etc.) Do assigned chores completely and in a timely fashion. Respect other's chore time- Deep shower time to a minimum. The next person likes hot water too! Remove laundry as soon as it's completed- Laundry room time is 9am to 9pm. Dishwasher hours: after 9am until1Opm, daily. ¡: 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. Keep telephone conversations to 15 minutes; check message machine when you complete your calls. Leave written messaGe to whomever has a recorded message. You are responsible for your guests. Do not leave them unattended in the house. NO active users in this house at ANY time- If conflict arises, try to resolve it by appropriate mutual aGreement Do not allow it to affect the entire household. If it is not possible to come to a mutually satisfactory resolution, then both parties are responsible to go to the house president to discuss the situation. ð!1 house members !!!sy be involved in resolving the problem. Noise is to be kept to an acceptable level at all times. T. v.s to be kept at 25 decibels or lower. Early morning viewing at 15 decibels. If anything gets broken - Ax it, replace it or if it needs the house attention, notify the house coordinator. We have no bosses in this Oxford House. . We illl share the responsibilities of this -- house for our benefit and personal growth. Housemates shoUld be notified if you are going to be out overnight Housemates should be notified if you are planning to be gone for severa! overnights, vacation, etc_. and at least a week prior to leaving (i.e- chore scheduling, rent payment, etc.). Rent payable in checks or money orders (NO CASH). Approved agency payee checks only are acceptable. Rent is due on the 1 st - 5th of the month unless arrangements are made otherwise with the comptrollerltreasurer. REMEMBER.... YOUR rent pays OUR rent. Weekly house meetinGs are mandatory! House decisions are made at these times and you are responsible to be here! Excuses for work, hospital or prearranged absences only are allowed. (1) Unexcused absences - $25.00 fine (Not calling or telling house.) (2) Chore duties - (Incomplete or unsatisfactory chore duty_) 1 st Offense - Warning 2nd Offense - $5.00 Fine 3rd Offense (90 days) - $20.00 Fine - Write-up and/or (house meeting) Ughts, TV_s. radios, etc. should be turned off when not in use. Thermostat should be kept at 68 degrees during the day and 58 degrees at night. Bedroom areas should be kept neat and clean at all times. Be courteous when other housemates have already started cooking. Be patient and - wait your turn- r . \ ' , 30. 31. Interaction with each other is encouraged. Take time to share feelings, hobbies, hopes and dreams with other housemates. Disruptive behavior will constitute a house decision to place an individual or individuals on a "Contracr. 32. Phvsical violence will be dealt with as a Relapse. The parties involved will be expelled from this house. All house members must be called together to vote on these situations. . RELAPSE No refund on deposit Refund on remaining rent (prorated). 33. Two (2) week notice given when relocating from this Oxford House, or no deposit refund. Refund on deposit after ninety (90) days; (3) three months only- Refund after all monies owed to house are paid. 34. (1) House vote required on extenuating circumstances! No firearms or ammunition allowed in house without majority house consent. OXFORD HOUSE 'ü"OOlî! ~@IIiJ~lî!I?'ü" IA @WiTlm @~ @1?lî!~'ü"D@IIiJ@ 1A1IiJ@ ~DIi'1J@IIiJ@ Recovery, Responsibility, and Replication Started in the Washington. DC. area in 1975. Oxford House is a concept and system of self-run. self- supported group housing for recovering alcoholics and drug addicts. The first house for thirteen men opened a second house within six months. At present, there are over 630 Oxfdtd Houses for both men and women in.39 states and 263 cities. As a result of PL 100-690. the Anti-Orug Abuse Act of 1988, the cost effectiye, self-run. self-supported recoyety house is being replicated throughout the nation. PoL. 100-690 requires each state to establish a revolving fund to make loans to cover the security deposit and first month's rent for groups of recovering individuals who wish to start a recoyety home. Oxfotd House provides each new group on Oxfotd House Charter and provides the new group with the know- how and support to establish and operate a successful house. The Charter is free, but there are three Conditions that each group must follow in older to comply with the law and to keep its charter. 1. The House must operate using democratic procedures; 2. The Group must be finan~ally self-supporting, and 3. Any resident who relapses into using drugs or alcohol, must be immediately expelled. Oxtotd House. Inc.. is a non-profit, tax exempt, publically supported corporation which acts as a umbrella organization for the national network of Oxtetd Houses. It provides quality control by organizing regional Houses into Chapters and by relying heavily upon the national network of Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous groups. While Oxfotd House is not affiliated with AA or NA, its members realize that recoyety from alcoholism and drug addiction can only be assured by changing lifestyle through full participation in AA and NA. In most communities. members of those organizations help Oxtetd Houses get started and report any charter compliance problems with respect to a particular House. As soon as Oxtotd House. Inc..hears of such problems. it takes corrective action because the good name of Oxford House is an important factor in the recovety of thousands of individuals. . Q-1. WHAT IS AN OXFORD HOUSE? Oxford House is a self-run. self-supported recoyery house program for individuals recovering from- alcoholism and drug addiction. Oxtotd Houses assure an alcohol and drug-free living environment. There are no resident counselors in an Oxfotd House. '. Q-2. WHO MANAGES AN OXFORD HOUSE? . Oxford Houses are democratically self-run by the residents who elect officers to serve for terms of six months. In this respect. they are similar to a college fraternity or sorority. Howeyer. if a majority of residents belieye that any member has relapsed into using alcohol or drugs. that person is immediately expelled. Q-3. HOW LONG CAN ANYONE UVE IN AN OXFORD HOUSE? A recovering indiyidual can live in an Oxtotd House for as long as he or she does not drink alcohol, does not use drugs. and pays an equal share of the house expenses. The average 'stay is a little over a year. but may residents stay three. four. or more years. There is no pressure on anyone in good.standing to leave. Q-4. WHY IS OXFORD HOUSE SELF-RUN? Oxford Houses are self run because (1) this permits individuals in recoyery to learn' responsibility, and (2) the cost associated with self-run housing permits extensive replication pf houses. Each House is fully responsible for its own expenses and debts which will not and cannot be assumed by the National Organization of Oxford Houses. >' - .. Oxford House - The Concept - A System of Operations and Traditions .Page 2 Q-5. HOW CAN ONE GET INTO AN OXFORD HOUSE? Any recoyering alcoholic or drug addici' can apply to get into any oxford House by filling out an application and being interviewed by the existing members of the House. The application is then considered by the membership of the House and if there is a yacancy and if 80% of the members approve, the applicant is accepted and moves in. Q.ô. WHAT IF THERE IS NOT OXFORD HOUSE IN AN AREA OR THERE ARE NO VACANCIES IN ANY OXFORD HOUSE IN THE REGION? Any Group of recoyering individuals can start a new Oxford House. All they need to do is to find a house to rent in the name of the Group, and apply to Oxfoo House, Inc., fer a chatter. . Q-7. IS THERE ANY RNANCIAL AID AVAILABLE TO START A NEW OXFORD HOUSE? Yes, each most states have iri place a revolving loan fund that can make loans to cover the first month's rent and security deposit (up to $4000) to rent a house in a good neighborhood. The loan must be repaid by the group within two years in 24 equal installments. Q-8. . CAN THE NEW HOUSE BECOME AFRUATED WTTH OXFORD HOUSE? Yes, by simply writing or calling Oxford House to ask for a Charter application. Once that application is completed and received by Oxford House, Inc., a 'Conditional Charter" will be be granted to the house at no cost. A Permanent Charter must be earned by the House. Q-9. CAN AN OXFORD HOUSE BE STARTED WITHOUT A LOAN FROM THE STATE? Yes, the prospective residents of the House can find a suitable house. rent it. put up the security deposit and pay the. first month's rent themselyes. Oxford House, Inc. will consider favorably a Charter application whether or not a loan is receiyed from the State. Q-10. CAN BOTH MEN AND WOMEN LJIÆ IN THE SAME OXFORD HOUSE? No. Experience has shown that Oxford Houses work for both men and women, but not in the same house. . Q-11. WHAT IS THE "IDEAL" NUMBER OF INDMDUALS TO MAKE A SELF-RUN, SELF-SUPPORTED RECOVERY HOUSE WORK? Experience of Oxford House has shown that from 8 to 15 members works very well. A house with fewer than six individuals is difficult to maintain because of the small size of the group and the fact that any vacancy causes a greater disruption of the financial welfare of the house. A Hoùse with less than six (6) residents ¡¡¡m¡¡¡¡tand WIll not be recognized or Chartered by Oxford House and win not quaflfy for a loan. Q-12.HOW MUCH SOBRIETY OR CLEAN TIME IS NEEDED BEFORE AN INDMDUAL CAN BE ACCEPTED INTO AN OXFORD HOUSE? There is no time limit. Generally an individual comes into an Oxford House following a 28-day rehabilitation program or at least 1 D-day detoxification program. FOR MORE INFORMATION WRITE OR CAlL; . Financial Services Office I Oxford House, Inc.. P.O. Box 179 Great Falls, VA 22066-0179 (703) 450-6501 Loan and Charter Information Hotline: Fax Hotline 1-(800) 486-6488 1 (800) 899-6577 --,.....