The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 05-20-2003 Regular City of Federal Way City Council Meeting AGENDA COUNCILMEMBERS Jeanne Burbidge, Mayor Jack Dovey Linda Kochmar Eric Faison Dean McColgan Mary Gates Mike Park CITY MANAGER David H. Moseley Office of the City Clerk May 20, 2003 1. II. III. IV. v. AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Regular Meeting May 20, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. (www.cityoffederalwaycom) ***** CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATIONS a, b. American Heart Association/King County Heart Walk Co-Chair Parks & Recreation Commission Introductions/Certificates (incoming) Parks & Recreation Commission/Appreciation Plaque (outgoing) Introduction of New Employees/City Manager Emerging Issues/City Manager c. d. e. CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed bv a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Councillor approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. b. Minutes/May 6, 2003 Regular Meeting Council Bill #322/Amendments to Zoning Code/Design Guidelines/Height Enactment Ordinance Belle Meadows Final Plat Approval - Resolution 8th Ave S & S 312th St Traffic Signal & Intersection Improvement Project c. d. Over please. V1. VII. VIII. Ix. a. b, X. e. SW Dash Point Rd (lìJ 8th Ave SW Rd & Signal Improvement Project/Final Acceptance & Authorization to Release Retainage S 288th St (lìJ SR-99 Signal & Intersection Improvements/Bid Award Purchase of Replacement Backhoe/Bid Award Surface Water Infrastructure Maintenance & Service Contract/Bid Award I-5/S 272nd Street Interchange Washington Conservation Corps Interloca1 Agreement Interlocal Cooperative Agreement/Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid & Mobilization between Cities of King County, University of Washington Police & King County f. g. h, i. j, k. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Selection of Voting Delegates for A WC Annual Business Meeting CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential LitigationlPursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) Property AcquisitionlPursuant to RCW 42,30.110(1 )(b) ADJOURNMENT " THE COUNCIL MA Y ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA ., THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW-FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LIBRARY" MEETING DATE: May 20, 2003 ITEM# --==rz- ( <Z) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS U ORDI"'ANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Bndgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on May 6, 2003. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirements, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nla PROPOSED MOTle~:: I move approvui of the minutes of the City Coul,cil regular ..Ieeting held on May 6, 2003. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ..~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTIO""' 0 MOVED TO SECOND READINC I",din""", "Iy) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Fnactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05110/2001 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Regular Meeting May 6, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. Minutes Q\tþ.~", ***** 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Burbidge called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of7:02 p.m, Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeanne Burbidge, Deputy Mayor Dean McColgan, Councilmembers Jack Dovey, Eric Faison, Mary Gates, Linda Kochmar and Mike Park. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and City Clerk Chris Green, II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Deputy Mayor McColgan led the flag salute. III. PRESENTATIONS a. SPIRIT Award/Month of May City Manager David Moseley was pleased to announce and present GIS Supervisor/IS Administrator Curt Ryser with the SPIRIT Award for the Month of May. Mr. Moseley noted Mr, Ryser was selected to receive the award due to his unflagging commitment to his work and to this city, and is a critical component to the success of every department in the city. Mr. Ryser accepted the award, and thanked Mr. Moseley. b. Swearing-In Ceremony/Police Officers Chief Anne Kirkpatrick was pleased to announce and introduce the following new police officers: Louis Quintanar, Doug Deyo, and Manuel Mairs (not in attendance), She also introduced Tiffany Krusey, a new Police Support Officer. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeling Minules May 6, 2003 - Page 2 of8 City Clerk Chris Green administered the oath of office to Officer Louis Quintanar, and Officer Doug Deyo, (ADDED ITEM) Washington Recreation and Park Association Award Mayor Burbidge announced Daryl Faber, Past President of the Washington Recreation and Park Association would present a special recognition to Recreation Coordinator Jennifer Mayer. Mr. Faber was pleased to present Ms. Mayer with the "Young Professional of the Year" Award on behalf of the Washington Recreation and Park Association. c, Independent Salary Commission Introductions/Certificates Mayor Burbidge announced and introduced the following individuals who have been appointed to the Independent Salary Commission: Kurt Weis, Wade Fisher, Frank Marshall, Gloria Elliott, David Head, Adebola Christopher Adekoya, and Ron Secreto, Those Commissioners unable to attend tonight's meetings will receive their certificates of appointment at a later date. She congratulated them all, d, Arts Commission Honorable Mention Awards/Jr-Sr High Art Show Councilmember Kochmar was pleased to announce and award the 2003 Federal Way Student Art Show sponsored jointly by the Youth and Arts Commission. Melissa Cate accepted the merit award on behalf of her piece entitled "new shoes"; Shawna Gherke received the merit award on behalf of her piece entitled "African woman", e, Proclamation/"Menta1 Health Month" Mayor Burbidge was pleased to present the proclamation declaring "Mental Health Month" to Charles Woode, Member of the Board of Directors Valley Cities Counseling and Consultation; Susan Mowrey, Director of the Federal Way Youth and Family Services; and Eleven Vexler, Manager of Federal Way North Child and Adolescent Center. Mr. Woode and Ms, Mowrey thanked the Mayor and Counci1members for the proclamation and continued support over the years to Mental Health in Federal Way, f. Introduction of New Employees/City Manager City Manager David Moseley was pleased to announce and introduce the following new employees: Michelle Hall as the city's new paralegal in the Law Department; Karen Jorgensen, the city's new Assistant City Attorney in the Law Department, and Shawna Sant the new Administrative Assistant in the Public Works Department. Mayor Burbidge welcomed them to the city. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 6, 2003 - Page 3 of 8 g, Emerging Issues/City Manager City Manager Moseley announced there are no emerging issues this evening. IV. CITIZEN COMMENT Ed Opstad, President of the Federal Way Historical Society announced May 5th -11 th is Historic Preservation Week, He encouraged citizens to view the historic documents in the foyer, and updated Council on the historic Barker cabin built in 1883. He also recommended more historical information can be found at www.fedcralwavhistorv.org . Mayor Burbidge thanked Mr. Opstad and the historical society for all the important work they do, and the hours devoted to the preservation of Federal Way's history, Gi1 Hulsman, spoke in support of Council Bill #322/Amendments to Zoning Code/Design Guidelines/Height on tonight's agenda. He supports the code amendment, which makes the code friendlier and easier to use for planners and developers, H. David Kaplan, spoke to clarify an article in the April 26th Federal Way Mirror regarding funding of the playground equipment at Celebration Park, He noted it was not donated due to the city's lack offunds, He stated the "Friends of Federal Way Parks" brought forth a banner program to fund the play equipment. V. CONSENT AGENDA a. b. Minutes/April15, 2003 Regular Meeting -Approved Vouchers-Approved Quarterly Financial Report/March 2003-Approved Banking Services Contract -Approved 2003 Interlocal Agreement for Waterfowl Management Program-Approved King County Developmental Disabilities Grant-Approved Amendment to Extend Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) Contract- Approved Amendment to Extend Myers Master Lawn Care Contract-Approved Dumas Bay Centre/Roof Maintenance System Final Acceptance & Release of Retainage-Approved Red, White & Blues Festival Fireworks/Request for Proposal (RFP) - Approved Parks Commission 2003-2004 Work Plan-Approved Human Services Commission 2003 Work Plan-Approved Purchase of Storage Trailer-Approved c. d. e, f. g. h. 1. j. k, I. m, Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 6, 2003 - Page 4 0/8 n, o. Valley Special Response Team-Approved Support of Special Olympics/Resolution-Approved Resolution #03-383 Steel Lake Management District Petition/Resolution-Approved #03-384 Tourism Enhancement Grant Awards-Approved p. q, COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SECOND. Counci1member Gates pulled item (d)/Banking Services Contract. Councilmember Kochmar pulled item (n)Nalley Special Response Team, Deputy Mayor McColgan pulled item (q)/Tourism Enhancement Grant Awards, The main motion to approve Consent Items (a), (b), (c), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), U), (k), (I), (m), (0), and (p) passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Item d/Banking Services Contract: Councilmember Gates noted she would be recusing herself from voting on this item, she is a longtime stockholder in the company. DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEM (d)/BANKING SERVICES CONTRACT AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed 6-0 as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes recused Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Item n/Valley Special Response Team: Councilmember Kochmar asked Police Chief Kirkpatrick to give a brief review of this item. Chief Kirkpatrick noted this agreement allows for the cities of Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and the Port of Seattle to establish and maintain a multi-jurisdictional Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 6, 2003 - Page 5 of 8 team to effectively respond to serious criminal occurrences, This multi-jurisdictional effort will handle specific serious criminal confrontations, as well as weapons of mass destruction, and will result in more effective pooling of personnel, improved utilization of municipal funds, reduced duplication of equipment, improved training, development of specialized expertise, and increased utilization/application of a combined special response team. COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEM (n)IV ALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Item q/Tourism Enhancement Grant Awards: Deputy Mayor McColgan reported on the importance of the Tourism Enhancement Grants that are funded from the lodging tax the city collects. He noted the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee received seven applications and funded a total of six. The six recipients are: USSSA of W A, Seattle "Major" NIT Softball Tournament, Pacific Northwest US Synchronized Swimming, 2003 United Airlines Open, Rhododendron Species Foundation/Tacoma Concert Band, Concert in the Park, Federal Way United Soccer Club, Blast Off Soccer Tournament, USSSA ofWA Men's "C" NW Divisional National Championship Softball Tournament, and King Aquatic Club, 2003 US Open Swimming Championship for a total amount of$25,200, DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (q)/TOURISM ENHANCEMENT GRANT AWARDS AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes VI. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS a, Selection of Voting Delegates for A WC Annual Business Meeting Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 6, 2003 - Page 6 of 8 DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN MOVED TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM AND PLACE IT ON THE MAY 20, 2003 COUNCIL AGENDA; COUNCIL MEMBER DOVEY SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates b, yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Parks & Recreation Commission Appointments COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR MOVED THE REAPPOINTMENT OF CT. PURDOM AND ADE BRIGHT TO VOTING MEMBERS OF THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION; AND THE APPOINTMENT JOSEPH HENRY TO THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION ALL TERMS THROUGH APRIL 30, 2006; DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park VII. INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE yes yes yes Council Bill #322/Amendments to Zoning Code/Design Guidelines/Height AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CHAPTER 22 (ZONING), ARTICLE XIX OF THE CITY CODE-DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEFINITION OF HEIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED COUNCIL BILL #322/AMENDMENTS TO ZONING CODE/DESIGN GUIDELINES/HEIGHT TO SECOND READING AND ENACTMENT AT THE NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 20, 2003; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 6, 2003 - Page 7 of 8 VIII. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Gates reported on a new trip planning service now available on the Internet, which will help citizens with using the transit system in trip planning, She further updated Council and distributed a written report on Sound Transit, and updated Council on other regional issues, Councilmember Kochmar reported on her attendance at various regional meetings and community events: she encouraged citizens to participate in the planning of the new community center, including completing the survey located on the city's web page, Councilmember Park announced the next FinancelEconomic Development/Regional Affairs Committee would be held May 27th at 2:00 p.m. Councilmember Dovey also encouraged citizens to participate in the Community Center survey currently on the website. Counci1member Faison announced the next Land Use/Transportation Committee meeting will be May 19th at 5 :30 p,m, Deputy Mayor McColgan wished good luck to the high school sports teams in district play and announced the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meeting had been rescheduled to May 16th, He announced the Boys and Girls Club breakfast had approximately 400 attendees and raised $45,000 for programs for the Boys and Girls Club. Mayor Burbidge noted she attended the Boys and Girls Club breakfast at Emerald Downs, and was pleased to see an increase in donations from last year for these important programs. She also reported on her attendance at various regional meetings and encouraged citizens to attend some of the fine performances in Federal Way. Ix. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley encouraged citizens to participate in the planning of the new Community Center through the website survey, you can access the questionnaire at "","w.cityoffcderalwav.com. He also noted the consultant team is back in town and meeting on Thursday. May nod at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. They will be conducting a design workshop at that time using a "hands on" approach in planning the new Community Center; he strongly encouraged citizens to attend. Mr. Moseley noted the City has concluded and signed the purchase and sales agreement for the Paragon building and vacant land north of the Paragon property for additional parking. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes May 6, 2003 - Page 8 of8 There is continued work on the due diligence phase of the project, which includes a complete inspection of the building and preparation of financial and legal documents. He acknowledged Community Development Department Korean Liaison Kim Hensley, who was recognized by the Federal Way School Board for her outstanding work in the community with ESL classes, youth workshops, and other volunteer activities. In addition, was pleased to announce that Chief Anne Kirkpatrick was also recognized by the school board, for the police department's pro-active approach in ensuring a secure learning environment in the schools. City Manager David Moseley further reminded Council of the need for an Executive Session for the purpose of discussing Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.11 O( 1 )(i) and Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.11 O( 1 )(b); for approximately thirty minutes, with possible action anticipated. x. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 8:05 p,m. Mayor Burbidge announced the Council would be recessing to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) and Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b) for approximately thirty minutes. a. b. Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30,110(1 )(b) At 8:35 p.m. Assistant City Manager Derek Matheson extended Executive Session for an additional thirty minutes, Council returned to Chambers at 8:45 p.m. XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Burbidge adjourned the regular meeting at 8:45 p.m, Stephanie Courtney Deputy City Clerk MEETING DATE: d:.LJ May I. 2003 ITEM# ~ ~) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE (FWCC) CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE XIX - DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEFINITION OF HEIGHT CATEGORY: '«Í CONSENT 'ð RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS BUDGET IMPACT: i:8J ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: 1) Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit A, 2) April 14,2003, Memorandum to the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTe) (Please note that Exhibits 1-6 of this memorandum is on file with the Clerk's Office), SUMMARYïBACKGROUNri;D~~ing¡ïi~C;tYco;;;;ciI pubiië ;;;~~¡¡;;g;;fj;;iy-ïi, 2oof¡ïi~C;;unc¡idi~~c¡~-d~t~ffïo - prepare amendments to Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines," pertaining to maximum façade length and roof pitch for institutional uses and maximum height for religious institutions. As a result, these code amendments were added to the Planning Commission Work Program. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 5, and March 19, 2003 and recommended that the council adopt the code amendments, as recommended by staff and amended by the Planning Commission, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the proposed text amendments during a public meeting on April 21, 2003. At that meeting, the LUTC recommended forwarding the amendments as proposed by the Planning Commission and amended by the LUTC (Exhibit A) to the full Council for first reading on May 6, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the LUTe's recommendation to approve the code amendments, which are attached as Exhibit A to the Adoption Ordinance," CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ----~---- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST READING ENACTMENT READING ORDINANCE # , RESOLUTION # ,~t:~ BILLDOC/04/30/2003 10:40 AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA TION April t4, 2003 TO: SUßJECT: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTe) David MO~ager Kathy McClung: Director of Community Development Services ~ Margaret H. CI~~P, Senior PIannerV'fJr- Lori Michaelsòif'~'-r' Senior Planner Amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article XIX - Design Guidelines and Definition of Height (File #O3-100842-00-UP) VIA: FROM: MEETING DATE: April 21,2003 I. BACKGROUND During the City Council public meeting of July 12, 2002, the Council directed staff to prepare amendments to Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines," pertaining to maximum façade length and roof pitch for institutional uses in residential zones and maximum height for religious institutions in residential zones. As a result, these code amendments were added to the Planning Commission Work Program. II. REASON FOR THE CODE AMENDMENTS The Community Design Guidelines were initially adopted in 1996, at which time they applied only to commercial, office, and industrial development uses in non-residential zones, They were later amended in 1999 to apply to all non-single family uses in any zone. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) regulations were adopted in 2000. These regulations pertain to all non-single family development. The purpose of the guidelines relating to roof pitch and façade was to control the visual impacts associated with large institutional uses. However, recent review of large institutional buildings such as schools and churches has identified that they are having difficulty meeting existing provisions relating to façade length, modulation, and roof pitch in any zone, Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1, "Definitions," institutional uses are defined as schools, churches, colleges, hospitals, parks, government facilities, and public utilities. Staff has also found that the maximum allowable height in the code does not allow sufficient height for sanctuaries with high ceilings, multiple level seating, or religious symbols that project above the rooftop. We have also received variance requests from churches relating to height; St. Vincent in 1995 and Christ Church in 2003, The City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner approved both of these variance requests. Rather than continuing to review individual variance requests, staff is recommending alternative design options for institutional uses to provide more flexibility in façade treatment, building modulation, and roof design, and increased building height for churches in all residential zones and the Community Business zone. III. PLANNING COMMISSION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 5, and March 19, 2003, and recommended that the code amendments, as recommended by staff and modified by the Planning Commission, be adopted by the council (Exhibit 1 - Code Amendments as Recommended by the Planning Commission and Exhibit 2 - March 19,2003, Planning Commission Minutes). The staff reports to the Planning Commission are attached as Exhibits 3, 4, and 5 of this memorandum. The staff recommended changes are shown as stFikeeHt underline (additions). Additional changes by the Planning Commission are shown as sßOOOO (deletions) and shådêiVåi1dúndei-line (additions). IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The proposed code amendments are summarized as follows: 1. Amendments to FWCC Section 22-1. Definitions of Average Building Elevation and Height As shown on Page I of Exhibit 1, changes are being recommended to the definition of "height" in order to clarify how height is being measured. This is simply a housekeeping amendment and neither the methodology nor the resulting maximum allowable height will be affected as a result of the clarification. A slightly lower height limit for single-family residential structures is also being proposed where the total roof area of dormers exceeds 35 percent of the total area of the underlying sloped roof. Excessive use of dormers on very large houses is becoming a trend and may pose a problem in the future in terms of blocking views especially along the shoreline. 2. Amendments to FWCC Section 22-1632. Applicability As shown on Page 3 of Exhibit 1, this section is proposed to be amended to state that the Community Design Guidelines apply to all development applications except single-family residential. The existing code language was written to protect the vesting of applications submitted prior to adoption of the different code amendments affecting this section and due to the passage of time since the amendments were adopted, is no longer necessary. 3. Amendments to FWCC Section 22-163S(b) Relating to Façade Treatment and Building Articulation FWCC Section 22-l635(b) requires that all building facades that are both longer than 60 feet and visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone incorporate certain facade treatment. In addition, FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(I5) requires that the longest dimension of any non-single family building façade in any zone not exceed 120 feet. The latter requirement is not practical for large institutional buildings. As a result, staffhas interpreted this to mean that no single plane of any building façade can exceed 120 feet in length without a significant structural modulation (i.e. building offset) every 120 feet. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #O3-100842-00-UP Page 2 However, staff has little code-based direction, beyond the administrative interpretation, as to what constitutes a "significant structural modulation." Additionally, the current code does not provide alternative treatments for these longer facades that may be equal to or more effective than modulation, Given this lack of existing code direction and design flexibility, it is recommended that the modulation standard be clarified and that additional design options be considered that will effectively break up and soften the appearance of long, institutional facades. In order to accomplish this a new section, FWCC Section 22-1639, is proposed to be added to address institutional uses in any zone where they are permitted. The proposed amendment gives both prescriptive direction on how the major structural modification should be accomplished as well as performance based options for alternative methods to accomplish the design (see pages 16 and 17 of Exhibit 1). 4. Roof Pitch Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Section 22-1638(a)(I3) of the Community Design Guidelines, all new non-single-family residential uses, including accessory buildings such as carports and garages, shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4: 12 to a maximum of 12: I 2. The Use Zone Charts regulate heights of buildings. While building height and roof design are important factors in regulating the bulk and scale of a building, the current regulations, when taken together, are inflexible and problematic for larger institutional buildings, like churches and schools. These types of facilities often need greater height for elements like sanctuaries, multi-level seating, and choir mezzanines; thereby, making it difficult to also accommodate a roof pitch without exceeding height limits. In some instances, the roof pitch requirement actually adds to the mass of the structure, which could have negative effects on surrounding residential properties or the residential character of the area, The code amendment proposes to delete the roof pitch requirements for institutional uses and replace it with the performance-based language (Section 22-1639[4], see Pages 16 and 17 of Exhibit 1), 5. Modification of Use Zone Charts The following special regulation currently applies to many uses in residential areas: If any portion of a structure on the subject property is within 100 feet of a low-density zone, then either: a) The height of that structure shall not exceed 15 feet above average building elevation; or b) The façade of that portion of the structure parallel to the low-density zone shall not exceed 50 feet in length. As part of the 2002 code amendments, the definition of low-density zone was modified for consistency with the comprehensive plan to mean only the Suburban Estates (SE) zone, which requires a minimum lot size of five acres. Previously, the low-density zone definition referred to all single-family residential zoning districts (SE, RS 35.0, RS 15.0, RS 9.6, and RS 7.2) except for the RS 5.0 zone (one unit per 5,000 square feet). With the 2002 code amendment, only uses within 100 feet of the SE zone would now be subject to this special regulation, In addition, there is already the requirement under FWCC Chapter Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 3 22, Section 22-1635(b) of the Community Design Guidelines that requires special architectural treatment of facades over 60 feet in length. Consequently, there appears to be some duplication between these two requirements. The recommendation is therefore to delete the special regulation as described above in the Use Zone Charts for churches in residential zones (refcr to page 19 of Exhibit 1 - SE Use Zone Chart, for an cxample of this language), 6. Maximum Height As mcntioned earlier in this mcmorandum, a number of churchcs have asked for height variances for sanctuarics with high ceilings, multi-Icvcl seating, raised pulpits or platforms for thc preacher or pastor, and a steeple or religious symbol. The maximum height for churchcs in zones where they are allowed are as follows: Zone Church SE 35 ft RS 30 ft RM 3.6 &2.4 30 ft RM 1.8 35 ft BC 35 ft CC-C 35 ft CC-F 35 ft There is already a provision to allow increased height for churches in the Community Business (BC), City Center Core (CC-C), and City Center Frame (CC-F) zones if approved through a Process III review, There is no maximum upper limit for the CC-C and CC-F zones and a maximum of up to 55 feet for the BC zone. Therefore, the height provisions for churches are recommended to be modified as follows: (a) For Suburban Estates (SE - one unit per five acres), Single Family Residential (RS), and Multiple Family Residential (RM) zones, allow an increase to 55 feet for sanctuaries if an additional one-foot setback beyond the required setback is provided for every one additional foot in height above the base height allowed. For all other portions of the building, allow an increase to 40 feet if an additional one-foot setback is provided for every one-foot in additional height, and the additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use to be conducted in the building. Staff had recommended to the Planning Commission that the footprint of that portion of the sanctuary exceeding 40 feet in height not exceed 50 percent of the total area of the building footprint of the portion of the church use on the subiect propertv. Upon further analvsis, staff;s recommending that this provision be deleted as it may actuallv penalize smaller churches where the maioritv of the building is proposed for a sanctuary. (b) For Suburban Estates (SE), Single Family Residential (RS), Multiple Family Residential (RM), and Community Business (BC) zones, religious symbols for churches and other religious institutions may exceed the highest point of the underlying roof on which it is mounted by an additional 15 feet, provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is permitted on the principal structure for this use (refer to page 19 of Exhibit 1 - SE Use Zone Chart, for an example of this language), (c) The proposed amendments to the design guidelines will provide design flexibility for rooflines as an alternative to pitched roofs as discussed in Section IV (4) above. Two-story churches have a Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #O3-IOO842-00-UP Page 4 typical floor-to-ceiling height of 28 to 29 feet. It is therefore recommended that architectural extensions of flat rooflines, such as parapets and articulated cornices, be allowed to exceed the height limit by three feet when the base height is 30 feet; rooflines above 30 feet would not require the exception to accommodate the additional elements, This will allow and encourage added architectural elements to two-story buildings instead of forcing designers to drop the underlying ceiling height below 30 feet to accommodate such roofline aesthetics. The three-foot exception is recommended since it is 10 percent of the 30-foot base height. Language has been inserted in the RS and RM Use Zone Charts which both have base heights of 30 feet to address this (refer to page 20 of Exhibit 1 - RS Use Zone Chart, for an example of this language). 7. Proposed Miscellaneous Changes to Article XIX. Community Design Guidelines (a) FWCC See/ion 22-1635. Building Design, All Zoning Districts - The following additional criterion is proposed to articulate blank walls (see page 11 of Exhibit 1): (c) (2) b, Window oDenings with visible trim material. or Dainted detailing that resembles !rim; (b) FWCC Section 22-1636. Building and Pedestrian Orientation, All Zoning Districts- The statement "(does not apply to residential zones)" is proposed to be deleted because non-residential uses such as churches and schools are allowed in residential zones and should also be governed by this section (see page 12 of Exhibit 1). (c) FWCC Section 22-1638. District Guidelines - Section 22-1638(9) is proposed to be amended as follows (see page 13 of Exhibit 1): Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums and other comparable large institutional uses. The maximum height for large institutional uses shall be 30 feet and shall include cutoff shields. This change is being proposed because the height of the lighting structure is related to the amount of illumination coverage. Similar to public parks and school stadiums, other large institutional sites would have to provide more 20-foot taillight fixtures than 30-foot tall fixtures to safely illuminate the site. Requiring shorter structures would add substantially to the cost of lighting for larger sites. In addition, the taller structures would not be out of scale with larger facilities. The provision for 20-foot fixtures is, therefore, not proposed for larger institutional uses. However, there would still be the flexibility to require 20-foot tall structures for smaller institutional sites. (d) New FWCC Section 22-1639. Institutional Use - Section 22-1639(6) is being proposed to allow modifications to the parking lot landscaping requirements of FWCC Section 22-1638(a)(7) (see page 17 of Exhibit 1). The reason for this proposed amendment is to encourage retention of existing natural features and systems on large mostly undeveloped sites, which is also consistent with low- impact development techniques being considered by the City. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #O3-IOO842-00-UP Page 5 V. COUNCIL ACnON/ST AFF RECOMMENDA nON The Committee has the following options: I. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed code ~ amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. Q) Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve the proposed code amendments. 3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed code amendments. Staff recommends that the Committee recommend to the full Council Option No.2 above, that is, adoption of the Planning Commission's recommendations with the further clarification changes recommended by staff as described in Section IV (6)(a) (shown as underlined). VI. LAND USEfI'RANsPoRTAnON COMMITTEE RECOMMENDA nON The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows: ~ As recommended by Planning Commission. As recommended by Planning Commission and amended by the LUTC. ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION: ~/l~ c aiso! (bhair) A~~/£ /' Mike Park . ,./' \......... LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit I Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Planning Commission Recommendation March 19,2003, Planning Commission Minutes Staff Report for the March 5, 2003, Planning Commission Public Hearing Staff Report for the March 19,2003, Planning Commission Public Hearing (Continued) Follow-up Materials for the March 19,2003, Planning Commission Public Hearing (Continued) Ordinance Adopting Code Amendments K:\CD PlanninglDesign Guide~ncs & Definitim ofHeight\!1JfCIPC Rec StatTRep<rt to LUTC.DOCIO4/l51200311:ll AM Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation tò LUTC File #O3-100842-00-UP Page 6 ORDINANCE NO. 03 - OR~f't '¡(ir 1!~J CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CHAPTER 22 (ZONING), ARTICLE XIX OF THE CITY CODE -DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEFINITION OF HEIGHT WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July 1996, which significantly revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 (Zoning); WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) relating to maximum façade length, modulation, roof pitch, and other miscellaneous standards for institutional uses, and height for churches will provide for more flexibility and improved design options for institutional buildings; WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that these code amendments will implement and are consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these code amendments on March 5, and March] 9, 2003, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered these code amendments on April 2], 2003, following which it recommended adoption of the text amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendments relating to maximum façade length, modulation, roof pitch, and other miscellaneous standards for institutional uses, and height for churches are consistent with the intent and purpose of FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare ofthe general public, OrdNo. 03- ,Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendments will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2. Conclusions, Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption ofthe proposal: 1. The proposed FWCC text amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUG] Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. LUP6 Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the development review process. LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single1amily neighborhoods. LUP]5 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. 2. The proposed amendments bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because they will result in more aesthetically pleasing institutional buildings throughout the City, while ensuring compatibility with adjacent residential areas. and 3. The proposed amendments are in the best interest ofthe residents of the City because they will supplement existing development standards and clarifY various code sections, Clarification of City codes is in the hest interests of the residents of the City. Section 3, Amendment. FWCC Chapter 22 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Section 4. Severability, The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable, The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder ofthe ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Oed No. 03- , Page 2 Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date, This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law, PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of ,2003. ApPROVED: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO: K:\CD Planning\Design Guidelines & Definition of HeightlLUTClAdoption Ordinance.docl04/2812003 5:09 PM Oed No. 03 - , Page 3 EXHIBIT A FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE Chapter 22, "Zoning" 22-1 Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Average building elevation (ABE) means a reference datum on lh" '"I f,,~" tvpvgl"phy vf a subject property from which building height is measured. Th" Id"I"II~" d"l"lIl ,1",11 t"" pvilll IIV high"I 1l1"11 flv" fcd "tVV" tI," lvw",l d"v"livII l"k"1I al "IIY ""to, ivI w,,1I vf lh" ,llUd"," "ilh"I pI iVI tv "IIY d"vdvplIl"lIl "divily VI "t filli,h"d g",d", whidI"V"1 i, Ivw"l, p!Uvid"d lh" Id"I"II~" d"l"lIl i, "4",,1 tv VI IvW"1 1l1"11 lh" high",1 d"v"livII "I "IIY ""tolivl w"ll vflh" ,llUd"l" pIÏVI lv d"vdvPlIl"lIl ,,~livily. A HF;~ thp ~vpr~gp of thp h;ghpd ~nð lowe~t pyi~ti"g "r propo<p'¡ plpv~tõon<, ~h;ehpver i~ '"west, t.J.pn ~t thp h~<p o£the pvtpr;or~~I1< ofthp <trnetnrp; provi'¡e<:J t]¡~t A HF <h~1I not hp grp~tpr th~n five feet .bovp thp lo~p~t py;<tõng Or propo<p'¡ plpvotion Allowed :--------- Building: Height: , , , , , , , , , 1----------- 5"--- ---------, , , , , , , , , , , , , -----' Lowest Elevation Reference datum (ABE) Highest Elevation Height of structure means the vertical distance above the average building elevation measured to the highest point of the wpillg uf a flat roof or to the deck line of a mansard roof, or to the "V"I"g" I,"ighl uf lh" high"'l g"tl" vf" pitch"d VI hipp"d IUve mið-p.,;nt ¡'ptwPfn P~vP ~n'¡ ri'¡gf of thf h;ghf<t pr;neipol roof of. goble, hip, gomhrpl, or <imilor dopp'¡ roof For <inglp-fomily rpd'¡pntõo' strl'.t.,res wbprp the t.,t~1 roof~rpo ofðormers eycep'¡< ~5 ppr.ent ofthp tnt~1 orpo ofthp .mðprlying dopp'¡ roof, hp;ght~;n bp mp~<nrp'¡ to the r;ðgp ofthp h;ghp<t pr;n.ipo' gohIe. Article XIX. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES Sections: 22-1630 Purpose. 22-1631 Administration. 22-1632 Applicability. 22-1633 Definitions. 22-1634 Site design - All zoning districts. 22-1635 Bnilding design - All zoning districts. 22-1636 Building and pedestrian orientation - All zoning districts. 22-1637 Mixed-nse residential buildings in commercial zoning districts. 22-1638 District guidelines. 22-1639 Design criteria for public on-site open space. 22-1640 Design for cluster residential subdivision lots. 22-1641 - 22-1650 Reserved. 22-1630 Purpose. The purpose of this article is to: (1) Implement community design guidelines by: a, Adopting design guidelines in accordance with land use and development policies established in the Federal Way comprehensive plan and in accordance with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Guidelines. b. Requiring minimum standards for design review to maintain and protect property values and enhance the general appearance of the city. c. Increasing flexibility and encouraging creativity in building and site design, while assuring quality development pursuant to the comprehensive plan and the purpose of this article. d. Achieving predictability in design review, balanced with administrative flexibility to consider the individual merits of proposals. e. Improving and expanding pedestrian circulation, public open space, and pedestrian amenities in the city. (2) Implement Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles by: a. Requiring minimum standards for design review to reduce the rate of crime associated with persons and property, thus providing for the highest standards of public safety, b. CPTED design principles are functionally grouped into the following three categories: 1. Natural Surveillance. This focuses on strategies to design the built environment in a manner that promotes visibility of public spaces and areas. 2, Access Control. This category focuses on the techniques that prevent and/or deter unauthorized and/or inappropriate access. 3. Ownership. This category focuses on strategies to reduce the perception of areas as "ownerless" and, therefore, available for undesirable uses. c. CPTED principles, design guidelines, and performance standards will be used during project development review to identifY and incorporate design features that reduce opportunities for criminal activity to occur. The effectiveness of CPTED is based on the fact that criminals make rational choices about their targets, In general: I, The greater the risk of being seen, challenged, or caught; the less likely they are to commit a crime. 2. The greater the effort required, the less likely they are to commit a crime, 3, The lesser the actual or perceived rewards, the less likely they are to commit a crime. d. Through the use of CPTED principles, the built environment can be designed and managed to ensure: Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ~2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03- I 00842-00-UP Page 2 ¡. There is more chance of being seen, challenged, or caught; 2, Greater effort is required; 3, The actual or perceived rewards are less; and 4. Opportunities for criminal activity are minimized, (Ord. No, 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord, No, 99- 333, § 3, I-I9-99;Ord, No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1631 Administration. Applications subject to community design guidelines and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) shall be processed as a component of the governing land use process, and the director of community development services shall have the authority to approve, modifY, or deny proposals under that process. Decisions under this article will consider proposals on the basis of individual merit and will encourage creative design alternatives in order to achieve the stated purpose and objectives of this article. Decisions under this article are appealable using the appeal procedures of the applicable land use process, (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16- 01) 22-1632 Applicability. This article shall apply to all commercial, office, ....d industrial development applications, in commercial - except sinl!le-family residential. subject to FWCC 22, Zoning" ami '.'illicH were submitted for re',iew after July I, I 991í, and shall apply to aRY ROR siRgIe family residential de"elopmeRtapplication in any ZeRO, which '.'ias suBmitted after January 25, ¡ 999. CPTED guidelines and performance standards sHall also apply to allpreuiously descriBed applications aBoue, induding community facilities and puBlic parks suBmitted after January 24, 2()Q(), CPTED guidelines am! performance staRaaras shall not apply to pr~ects that ¡",YO received pr"application re',ie'." prior te the effoctive date of the am@ndments, Project proponents shall demonstrate how each CPTED design principle is met by the proposal, or why it is not relevant by either a written explanation or by responding to a checklist prepared by the city. Subject applications for remodeling or expansion of existing developments shall meet only those provisions of this article that are deteffilined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the area of expansion or remodeling. This article in no way should be construed to supersede or modifY any other city codes, ordinances, or policies that apply to the proposal. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3,4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, §3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1633 Definitions. (I) Active use(s) means uses that by their very nature generate activity, and thus opportunities for natural surveillance, such as picnic areas, extracurricular school activities, exercise groups, etc. (2) Arcade means a linear pedestrian walkway that abuts and runs along the facade of a building. It is covered, but not enclosed, and open at all times to public use, Typically, it has a line of columns along its open side. There may be habitable space above the arcade. (3) Awning means a roof- like cover that is temporary or portable in nature and that projects from the wall of a building for the purpose of shielding a doorway or window from the elements, (4) Canopy means a peffilanent, cantilevered extension of a building that typically projects over a pedestrian walkway abutting and running along the facade of a building, with no habitable space above the canopy. A canopy roof is comprised of rigid materials. (5) Common/open space area means area within a development, which is used primarily by the occupants of that development, such as an entryway, lobby, courtyard, outside dining areas, etc, (6) Natural surveillance means easy observation of buildings, spaces, and activities by people passing or living/working/recreating nearby, (7) Parking structure means a building or structure consisting of more than one level, above and/or below ground, and used for temporary storage of motor vehicles. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <[;)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 3 (8) Plaza means a pedestrian space that is available for public use and is situated near a main entrance to a building or is clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. Typical features include special paving, landscaping, lighting, seating areas, water features, and art. (9) Public on-site open space means a space that is accessible to the public at all times, predominantly open above, and designed specifically for use by the general public as opposed to serving merely as a setting for the building, (10) Right-of-way means land owned, dedicated or conveyed to the public, used primarily for the movement of vehicles, wheelchair and pedestrian traffic, and land privately owned, used primarily for the movement of vehicles, wheelchair and pedestrian traffic; so long as such privately owned land has been constructed in compliance with all applicable laws and standards for a public right-of-way. (11) Sight line means the line of vision from a person to a place or building. (12) Streetscape means a tenn in urban design that defines and describes the character and quality of a street by the amount and type of features and furnishings abutting it. Such features and furnishings may include trees and other landscaping, benches, lighting, trash receptacles, bollards, curbing, walls, different paving types, signage, kiosks, trellises, art objects, bus stops, and typical utility equipment and appurtenances, (13) Surface parking lot means an off-street, ground level open area, usually improved, for the temporary storage of motor vehicles, (14) Transparent glass means windows that are transparent enough to permit the view of activities within a building from nearby streets, sidewalks and public spaces. Tinting or some coloration is permitted, provided a reasonable level of visibility is achieved. Reflective or very dark tinted glass does not accomplish this objective. (Ord, No, 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1634 Site design - All zoning districts. (a) General criteria. (1) Natural amenities such as views, significant or unique trees, creeks, riparian corridors, and similar features unique to the site should be incorporated into the design, (2) Pedestrian areas and amenities should be incorporated in the overall site design. Pedestrian areas include but are not limited to outdoor plazas, arcades, courtyards, seating areas, and amphitheaters. Pedestrian amenities include but are not limited to outdoor benches, tables and other furniture, balconies, gazebos, transparent glass at the ground floor, and landscaping, (3) Pedestrian areas should be easily seen, accessible, and located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, open spaces, significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure, (4) Project designers shall strive for overall design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project such as architectural style and features, materials, colors, and textures. (5) Place physical features, activities, and people in visible locations to maximize the ability to be seen, and therefore, discourage crime. For example, place cafes and food kiosks in parks to increase natural surveillance by park users, and place laundry facilities near play equipment in multiple family residential development. A void barriers, such as tall or overgrown landscaping or outbuildings, where they make it difficult to observe activity. (6) Provide access control by utilizing physical barriers such as bollards, fences, doorways, etc., or by security hardware such as locks, chains, and alarms. Where appropriate, utilize security guards. All of these methods result in increased effort to commit a crime, and therefore, reduce the potential for it to happen. (7) Design buildings and utilize site design that reflects ownership. For example, fences, paving, art, signs, good maintenance, and landscaping are some physical ways to express ownership, Identifying intruders is much easier in a well-defined space, An area that looks protected gives the impression that greater effort is required to commit a crime, A cared for environment can also reduce fear of crime, Areas that are run down and the subject of graffiti and vandalism are generally more intimidating than areas that do not display such characteristics, Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A «:>2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 4 (b) Surface parking lots. (I) Site and landscape design for parking lots are subject to the requirements of Article XVII of this chapter. (2) Vehicle turning movements shall be minimized. Parking aisles without loop access are discouraged. Parking and vehicle circulation areas shall be clearly delineated using directional signage. (3) Driveways shall be located to be visible from the right-of-way but not impede pedestrian circulation on-site or to adjoining properties, Driveways should be shared with adjacent properties to minimize the number of driveways and curb cuts. (4) Multi-tenant developments with large surface parking lots adjacent to a right-of-way are encouraged to incorporate retail pads against the right-of-way to help break up the large areas of pavement. (5) See FWCC 22-1638 for supplemental guidelines. (c) Parking structures (includes parking floors located within commercial buildings), (I) The bulk (or mass) ofa parking structure as seen from the right-of-way should be minimized by placing its short dimension along the street edge. The parking structure should include active uses such as retail, offices or other commercial uses at the ground level and/or along the street frontage. (2) Parking structures which are part of new development shall be architecturally consistent with exterior architectural elements of the primary structure, including rooflines, facade design, and finish materials. (3) Parking structures should incorporate methods of articulation and accessory elements, pursuant to FWCC 22-1635(c)(2), on facades located above ground level. (4) Buildings built over parking should not appear to "float" over the parking area, but should be linked with ground level uses or screening. Parking at grade under a building is discouraged unless the parking area is completely enclosed within the building or wholly screened with walls and/or landscaped benns. (5) Top deck lighting on multi-level parking structures shall be architecturally integrated with the building, and screened to control impacts to off-site uses. Exposed fluorescent light fixtures are not pennitted. (6) Parking structures and vehicle entrances should be designed to minimize views into the garage interior ftom surrounding streets. Methods to help minimize such views may include, but are not limited to landscaping, planters, and decorative grilles and screens, (7) Security grilles for parking structures shall be architecturally consistent with and integrated with the overall design. Chain-link fencing is not pennitted for garage security fencing. (8) See FWCC 22-l638(c)(4) for supplemental guidelines. (d) Pedestrian circulation and public spaces. (1) Primary entrances to buildings should be clearly visible or recognizable from the right-of-way. Pedestrian pathways from rights-of-way and bus stops to primary entrances, from parking lots to primary 'entrances, and pedestrian areas, shall be accessible and should be clearly delineated. (2) Pedestrian pathways and pedestrian areas should be delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in paved texture and color, and protected from abutting vehicle circulation areas with landscaping, Approved methods of delineation include: stone, brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Paint striping on asphalt as a method of delineation is not encouraged. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A "'2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 5 Fi¡;¡m:2.S<>;,Z2-1634(J) """",ion ..nn....... (3) Pedestrian connections should be provided between properties to establish pedestrian links to adjacent buildings, parking, pedestrian areas and public rights-of-way. (4) Bicycle racks should be provided for all commercial developments. (5) Outdoor furniture, fixtures, and streetscape elements, such as lighting, freestanding signs, trellises, arbors, raised planters, benches and other fonTIS of seating, trash receptacles, bus stops, phone booths, fencing, etc., should be incorporated into the site design. (6) See FWCC 22-1638 for supplemental guidelines. (e) Landscaping. Refer to Article XVII of this chapter for specific landscaping requirements and for definitions of landscaping types referenced throughout this article. (f) Commercial service and institutional facilities. Refer to FWCC 22-949 and 22- 1564 for requirements related to garbage and recycling receptacles, placement and screening. (1) Commercial services relating to loading, storage, trash and recycling should be located in such a manner as to optimize public circulation and minimize visibility into such facilities. Service yards shall comply with the following: a, Service yards and loading areas shall be designed and located for easy access by service vehicles and tenants and shall not displace required landscaping, impede other site uses, or create a nuisance for adjacent property owners. b, Trash and recycling receptacles shall include covers to prevent odor and wind blown litter, c. Service yard walls, enclosures, and similar accessory site elements shall be consistent with the primary building(s) relative to architecture, materials and colors. d. Chain-link fencing shall not be used where visible ITom public streets, on-site major drive aisles, adjacent residential uses, or pedestrian areas, Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <02002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 6 Fi¡¡ut'CJ.Se<.22-16:¡.(I} TrUll - otorog. ..... fllI"":.-$o;.:I2-1~"'1) lOO"" .,... (2) Site utilities shall comply with the following: a. Building utility equipment such as electrical panels and junction boxes should be located in an interior utility room. b. Site utilities including transformers, fire standpipes and engineered retention ponds (except biofiltration swales) should not be the dominant element of the front landscape area, When these must be located in a front yard, they shall be either undergrounded or screened by walls and/or Type I landscaping, and shall not obstruct views of tenant common spaces, public open spaces, monument signs, and/or driveways. (g) Miscellaneous site elements. (I) Lighting shall comply with the following: a. Lighting levels shall not spill onto adjacent properties pursuant to FWCC 22-954(c). b, Lighting shall be provided in all loading, storage, and circulation areas, but shall incorporate cut-off shields to prevent off-site glare. c. Light standards shall not reduce the amount oflandscaping required for the project by Article XVII ofthis chapter, Landscaping. (2) Drive-through facilities such as banks, cleaners, fast food, drug stores and service stations, etc., shall comply with the following: Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A (\)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03- I 00842-00-UP Page 7 a. Drive-through windows and stacking lanes are not encouraged along facades of buildings that face a right-of-way. If they are permitted in such a location, then they shall be visually screened from such street by Type III landscaping and/or architectural element, or combination thereof, provided such elements reflect the primary building and provide appropriate screening. b. The stacking lane shall be physically separated from the parking lot, sidewalk, and pedestrian areas by Type III landscaping and/or architectural element, or combination thereof, provided such elements reflect the primary building and provide appropriate separation. Painted lanes are not sufficient. c. Drive-through speakers shall not be audible off site. d. A bypass/escape lane is recommended for all drive-through facilities. e. See FWCC 22-1638(d) for supplemental guidelines. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99- 333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1635 Building design - All zoning districts. (a) General criteria. (1) Emphasize, rather than obscure, natural topography. Buildings should be designed to "step up" or "step down" hillsides to accommodate significant changes in elevation, unless this provision is precluded by other site elements such as stormwater design, optimal traffic circulation; or the proposed function or use of the site, fìgure 5 . 5« ,< - r6<~ (aJ empNo"""G .......1 "~t (2) Building siting or massing shall preserve public viewpoints as designated by the Comprehensive Plan or other adopted plans or policies. (3) Materials and design features offences and walls should reflect that of the primary building(s). (b) Building facade modulation and screening options, defined. All building facades that are both longer than 60 feet and are visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone shall incorporate facade treatment according to this section. Subject facades shall incorporate at least two of the four options described herein; except, however, facades that are solidly screened by Type I landscaping, pursuant to Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping, may use facade modulation as the sole option under this section. Options used under this section shall be incorporated along the entire length of the facade, in any approved combination. Options used must meet the dimensional standards as specified herein; except, however, if more than two are used, dimensional requirements for each option will be determined on a case-by-case basis; provided, that the gross area of a pedestrian plaza may not be less than the specified minimum of200 square feet. See FWCC 22-1638(c) for guidelines pertaining to city center core and city center frame. (I) Facade modulation, Minimum depth: two feet; minimum width: six feet; maximum width: 60 feet. Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved facade elements, off-set planes, wing walls and terracing, will be considered; provided, that the intent of this section is met. Design Guidelines & Definition of Heighr Code Amendments Exhihit A (Ç)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 8 ;..:),;t:,:-:",'J",-':"~,' ~ f."'.,"fd-. J figlJre6. Scc.21.IM5 (bj In,"'I"'"""'- (2) Landscape screening. Eight-foot-wide Type II landscape screening along the base of the facade, except Type IV may be used in place of Type II for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrance(s). For building facades that are located adjacent to a property line, some or all of the underlying buffer width required by Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping, may be considered in meeting the landscape width requirement of this section. f/Ø~' $t.p¡ ,', "'o.. "'...' : . 0*,¡.~ '0$0: Q,f', , ",to* ~'I¡.-" fig¡¡r< 1- Scc.11-1ó:!5 (b) """"""".'9 .nd,,- -.. (3) Canopy or arcade, As a modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of-way. Minimum length: 50 percent of the length of the facade using this option, (4) Pedestrian Plaza. Size of plaza: Plaza square footage is equal to one percent ofthe gross floor area of the building, but it must be a minimum of200 square feet. The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A (92002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 9 E: ~- ~ ~. ! -;: FiI,fJ'" 8 -S::;:,22-1635(b) '-"-"'1 ""oY""'.' riirJl'O9-S«.21-16J5(b'¡ -'1""""'9 ..,- ,1m (c) Building articulation and scale. (1) Building facades visible from rights-of-way and other public areas should incorporate methods of articulation and accessory elements in the overall architectural design, as described in subsection (c)(2) of this section, FI_¡n,s..<,.~~, Ui,\S(,"¡ -~._...I>. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhihit A ;;>2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-] 00842-00-UP Page 10 .tJII,IE.[B,,[B.~~, /.'. ' .. ... " . Egurcll-S<,,22.¡6.'S(C) ""_01)' eo",",," .,"~,',' ~ ~h""""" Ymdaw. Fi?,m- I' Sec, 2~ I (".j ,'C) "-..- '-t.n;¡Sõãþin~ Vol1l<.III.III. - .- ~ .. Ar1wo"-."",1 [Oi" .'B~'" ~,~:;,"";"iI:';':-.".l"'.'" . ~I'":"::~' I . . . c .. , '" - . . . ," -, \ ' "'.I."",~.. ........ "'."',"'u.." """'" ....".., ..,.....,~ ~.......... ""W" ~"m r;~",,13.s...:.!!-IÓJ3(c' (2) Methods to articulate blank walls: Following is a nonexclusive list of methods to articulate blank walls, pursuant to FWCC 22-1564(u) and subsection (c)(l) of this section: a. Showcase, display, recessed windows; b. Window openine:s with visible trim material, or painted detailine: that resembles trim; b~. Vertical trellis(es) in front of the wall with climbing vines or similar planting; G!!., Set the wall back and provide a landscaped or raised planter bed in front of the wall, with plant material that will obscure or screen the wall's surface; ~. Artwork such as mosaics, murals, decorative masonry or metal patterns or grillwork, sculptures, relief, etc., over a substantial portion of the blank wall surface. (The Federal Way arts commission may be used as an advisory body at the discretion of the planning staff); ef. Architectural features such as setbacks, indentations, overhangs, projections, articulated cornices, bays, reveals, canopies, and awnings; fg. Material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, or textural changes; and g!!, Landscaped public plaza(s) with space for vendor carts, concerts and other pedestrian activities. (3) See FWCC 22-1638(c) for supplemental guidelines, (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No, 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord, No, 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <!;J2002 Code Publishing Co. File #O3-1O0S42-00-UP Page II 22-1636 Building and pedestrian orientation - All zoning districts. (a) Building and pedestrian orientation. (I) Buildings should generally be oriented to rights-of-way, as more particularly described in FWCC 22-1638. Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows, should be oriented to the right-of-way; otherwise, screening or art features such as trellises, artwork, murals, landscaping, or combinations thereof, should be incorporated into the street-oriented facade (does not app~' to residential zones). (2) Plazas, public open spaces and entries should be located at street corners to optimize pedestrian access and use, fíg""'14,.g,,,22-163q.) SNlrod pu>k opaAo/pt.... (3) All buildings adjacent to the street should provide visual access from the street into human services and activities within the building, if applicable, (4) Multiple buildings on the same site should incorporate public spaces (fonnal or infonnal), These should be integrated by elements such as plazas, walkways, and landscaping along pedestrian pathways, to provide a clear view to destinations, and to create a unified, campus-like development. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No, 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1637 Mixed-use residential buildings in commercial zoning districts. (a) Ground level facades of mixed-use buildings that front a public right-of-way shall meet the following guidelines: (1) Retail, commercial, or office activities shall occupy at least 20 percent of the gross ground floor, area of the building (unless exempt from this requirement by FWCC district zoning regulations). (2) If parking occupies the ground level, see FWCC 22-1634(c), Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A (\)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 12 (3) Landscaped gardens, courtyards, or enclosed terraces for private use by residents should be designed with minimum exposure to the right-of-way. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19- 99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1638 District guidelines. In addition to the foregoing development guidelines, the following supplemental guidelines apply to individual zoning districts: (a) Professional office (PO), neighborhood business (BN), and community business (BC). (I) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right-of-way or pedestrian area. (4) Ifutilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl-coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For residential uses only: (5) Significant trees shall be retained within a 20-foot perimeter strip around site. (6) Landscaped yards shall be provided between building(s) and public street(s). Parking lots should be beside or behind buildings that front upon streets. (7) Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas, (8) Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. (9) Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums and other comparable larl!e institutional uses. The maximum heil!ht for Iarl!e institutional uses shall be 30 feet and shall include cutoff shields, 20' Figure 1&- SIx. 22-1638(.) (10) Principal entries to buildings shall be highlighted with plaza or garden areas containing planting, lighting, seating, trellises and other features, Such areas shall be located and designed so windows overlook them, Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A @2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 13 R~,'IXJ7.S", 22. 1638 (a) (I I) Common recreational spaces shall be located and arranged so that windows overlook them, ~,~f F;f""']b-~.22-16.'8(') (12) Units on the ground floor (when permitted) shall have private outdoor spaces adjacent to them so those exterior portions of the site are controlled by individual households. figo",J9-5«,"Z-J638t.) (13) All new buildings, including accessory buildings, such as carports and garages shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4:12 to a maximum of 12:12. ~2' . .' F_»_"'~" ' Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhihit A <1:>2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 14 (14) Carports and garages in front yards should be discouraged. (15) The longest dimension of any building facade shall not exceed 120 feet. Buildings on the same site may be connected by covered pedestrian walkways. (16) Buildings should be designed to have a distinct "base", "middle" and "top" The base (typically the first floor) should contain the greatest number of architectural elements such as windows, materials, details, overhangs, cornice lines, and masonry belt courses. The midsection by comparison may be simple. (Note: single-story buildings have no middle.) The top should avoid the appearance of a flat roof and include distinctive roof shapes including but not limited to pitched, vaulted or terraced, etc, f'igul< 21 . S<c ?2. 1638 i.' (17) Residential design features, including but not limited to entry porches, projecting window bays, balconies or decks, individual windows (rather than strip windows), offsets and cascading or stepped roof forms shall be incorporated into all buildings, Window openings shall have visible trim material or painted detailing that resembles trim, (b) Office park (OP), corporate park (CP), and business park (BP). (I) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) ofthe building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d), (2) Buildings with ground floor retail sales or services should orient major entrances, display windows and other pedestrian features to the right-of-way to the extent possible. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right-of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain- link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl-coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For non-single-family residential uses only: (5) Subsections (a)(5) through (A)(l7) ofthis section shall apply, (c) City center core (CC-C) and city center frame (CC-F). (I) The city center core and frame will contain transitional forms of development with surface parking areas. However, as new development or re-development occurs, the visual dominance of surface parking areas shall be reduced, Therefore, surface parking areas shall be located as follows: a, The parking is located behind the building, with the building located between the right-of-way and the parking areas, or it is located in structured parking; or b, All or some of the parking is located to the side(s) of the building; or c. Some short-term parking may be located between the buiIding(s) and the right-of-way, but this shall not consist of more than one double-loaded drive aisle, and pedestrian circulation shall be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d), Large retail complexes may not be able to locate parking according to the above guidelines, Therefore, retail complexes of 60,000 square feet of gross floor area or larger may locate surface parking between the building(s) and the right-of-way. However, this form of development shall provide for small building(s) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A "'2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03- I 00842-00-UP Page 15 along the right-of-way to break up and reduce the visual impact of the parking, and pedestrian circulation must be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634( d). For purposes of this guideline, retail complex means the entire lot or parcel, or series of lots or parcels, on which a development, activity or use is located or will locate. (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Building facades that are visible from a right-of-way and subject to modulation per FWCC 22- 1635(b), shall incorporate facade treatment as follows: a. The facade incorporates modulation and/or a landscape screening, pursuant to FWCC 22- 163S(b); and b. The facade incorporates an arcade, canopy or plaza; and/or one or more articulation element listed in FWCC 22-163 S( c )(2); provided, that the resulting building characteristics achieve visual interest and appeal at a pedestrian scale and proximity, contribute to a sense of public space, and reinforce the pedestrian experience. (4) Drive-through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located along a facade of a building that faces a right-of-way, (S) Above-grade parking structures with a ground level facade visible from a right-of-way shall incorporate any combination of the following elements at the ground level: a, Retail, commercial, or office uses that occupy at least 50 percent of the building's lineal frontage along the right-of-way; or b. A IS-foot-wide strip of Type III landscaping along the base of the facade; or c. A decorative grille or screen that conceals interior parking areas from the right-of-way. (6) Facades of parking structures shall be articulated above the ground level pursuant to FWCC 22- 163S(c)(l). (7) When curtain wall glass and steel systems are used to enclose a building, the glazing panels shall be transparent on SO percent ofthe ground floor facade fronting a right-of-way or pedestrian area, (8) Chain-link fences shall not be allowed. Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. For non-single-family residential uses only: (9) Subsections (a)(S) through (a)(I7) of this section shall apply. (d) For all residential zones. (1) Non-residential uses, Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(lO) and (a)(13) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (2) Non-single-family residential uses. Subsections (a)(S) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply, (Ord. No, 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1639 Institutional uses. (a) In all zoninl! districts where such uses are permitted the followinl! shall apply. (1) Sections 22-1634, 22-1635, and 22-1636. (2) Subsections 1638(a)(1) throul!h (a)(5) and (a)(7) throul!h (a)(9). (3) Buildinl! facades that exceed 120 feet iu leul!th and are visible from an adiacent residential zone, ril!ht-of-way or public park or recreation area shall incorporate a sil!nificant structural modulation (offset). The minimum depth of the modulation shall be approximately equal to ten percent of the totallenl!th of the subject facade and the minimum width shall be approximately twice the minimum depth. The modulation shall be intel!ral to the buildinl! structure from base to roofline. (4) Roof desil!n shall utilize forms and materials that avoid the I!eneral appearance of a "flat" roof. Rooflines with an intel!ral and obvious architectural pitch are an approved method to meet this !uideline. Alternatiye distinctiye roof forms such as yaried and multiple stepped rooflines, architectural parapets, articulated cornices and fascias, arches, eyebrows, and Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A r¡)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #O3-100842-00-UP Page 16 similar methods will be considered by the director provided that the roof desien minimizes uninterrupted horizontal planes and results in architectural and visual appeal. (5) Alternative methods to oreanize and shape the structural elements of a buildine and provide facade treatment pursuant to Subsection 1635(b) and/or (3), above, will be considered by the director as part of an overall desien that addresses the followine criteria: a. Façade des;en incorporates at least two o£the options listed at Subsection 1635(b); b. The location and dimensions of structural modulations are proportionate to the heieht and leneth of the subject facade, usine Subsections 1635(b) and (3) above, as a euideline; c. Façade desien incorporates a majority of architectural and accessory desien elements listed at Subsection 22-1635(c)(2) and maximizes buildine and pedestrian orientation pursuant to Section 22-1636; and d. Overall buildine desien utilizes a combination of structural modulation, facade treatment, and roof elements that oreanize and vary buildine bulk and scale, add architectural interest, and appeal at a pedestrian scale, and when viewed from an adjacent residential zone, riehts-of-way, or other public area, results in a project that meets the intent of these euidelines. (6) The director may permit or require modifications to the parkine area land sea pine standards of Subsection 1638(a)(7) for landscape desiens that preserye and enhance existine natural features and systems, provided that the total amount of existine and proposed landscapine within parkine area(s) meets the applicable square footaee requirement ofFWCC Article XVII, Landscapine, and the location and arraneement of such landscapine is approved bv the director. Existine natural featnres and svstems include environmentallv sensitive areas, stands of sienificant trees and native veeetation, natural topoeraphy and drainaee patterns, wildlife habitat, mieration corridors, and connectivity to adjacent habitats. 22-16J9£! Design criteria for public ou-site open space. The following guidelines apply to public on-site open space that is developed pursuant to the height bonus program established in Article XI, Division 8, of this chapter, (I) Open space developed under this section should be located so that it: a. Abuts a public right-of-way, or alternatively, is visible and accessible from a public right-of- way; b. Is bordered on at least one side by, or is readily accessible from, structure(s) with entries to retail or office uses; housing, civic/public uses, or another public open space; and c. Is situated for maximum exposure to sunlight. (2) Open space site design and configuration must meet a majority of the following guidelines: a, The gross area of the open space does not incorporate any other site elements such as setbacks, landscaping, buffers, paving, or stonn drainage facilities, that would otherwise be incorporated into site design without exercising the open space option; b. The gross area ofthe open space encompasses at least 2.5 percent of the lot area, up to a total aggregate square footage of25,000 square feet; c. The open space area must be clearly visible and accessible fTom the adjacent right-of-way; d. The primary area is at least 25 feet in width; e. A minimum of 15 percent of the total area of the open space is landscaped using Type IV landscaping or other landscaping alternative; and f. The open space may not be used for parking or loading of commercial vehicles. Commercial vehicle loading areas abutting the open space must be screened by a solid, site-obscuring wall. (Ord. No, 96- 271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No, 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A 'Þ2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 17 22-16401 Design for cluster residential subdivision lots. (a) Garages shall be provided for all residential lots except ifthe lot is in a multifamily zone. (b) Front entryways should be the prominent feature of the home, Attached garages should not compose more than 40 percent of the front facade ofthe single-family home ifthe garage doors are flush with the front facade, or will be set back a minimum of five feet from the rest ofthe front facade. Detached garages should also be set back a minimum of five feet from the facade. (c) If garage access is provided from alleys, the front yard setback can be reduced to 15 feet. (d) Each dwelling unit shall be intended for owner occupancy. (Ord. No, 01-381, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1644-~- 22-1650 Reserved. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A "'2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 0O842-00-UP Page 18 Sec. 22-601. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in the suburban estate (SE) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: '" z 0 ¡:: .." ...¡ ~ " USE :;j Chu,ch, synagogue moth« place of mllgious wmship DIRECTIONS, FIRST, m,d dow" 10 fi"d u" . MINIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS '" if] U 0 0« gj~ 5", 0':> gjgj ~ '" 1 '" ~ USE ZONE CHART THEN, "'°"' fm REGULATIONS MAXIMUMS ~ gj "' 0 ~ "' :> 0 u f-< :3 ",gj O~ f-<f-< :t:U 0::> -« ~i;; if] U .." .. """ gj° 50!: ~~ ZONE SE "' ¡;¡ ò ...¡ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Pmcess IV 15 acrespo ft. 130 ft. 130 ft. 175% 135 ft. A I, This use must obtain a mastef~"lan appmved thmugh Pmcess IV The m",t" plan must Showth. e ultimate. d..evelo..pm. ent ~rthe See note I above transportation sote including all bmldlngs, packing and circulatIOn am"" oth" major Improvements and buffers For omoo,.ls alsOJ"qo",'B1 a average management dovelopme",,"reement the citv coundl's public heacin, on a do"'"P,"e"t a.reement shall tako..thß place.2Jtb~pJ)J>llc heacinj¡ building plan (TMP) fm most<:Lplan appmval bv the heacin, examiner. elevation. shall be 2. The subject pmpetty may contain a rectory or similac dwelling unit for u" by the religious leader of the congmgation. [fthis is submitted", a detached dwelliog unit, its "tbacks are os establIshed fo, detached dwellIng units in the zone Start fth 3. Th"ubjeet pmpetty must b"djacentto a collectoror arterial ,ight-of-way 4e~no~s6 PI? re 4.lfan:porti'Rofa"mctu"oRlh"uÞj"tp,op,"""I"",dl""hanIQPAf,,maRa<ljaCORtlo ""i~",R"lh,",ith" ~i:lCaon"h I a Th,h"ghtofthatpo"iORofth,"n"tucoshallRot""",lsA abo',a ""g'ÞI il;¡Rg,I,"'ion;or eTMPs al ÞTh,fuoad"ftRatportl,.oflh'stmGtu"parall,llo'¡',lo ,,""i~ ""hallnot""",sOA.iRIOR"t. address the 4. Maximum hel.htofany portion ofthebuHding mav be increased from 35 feet to 40 feet if all of the followin. are met followmg' a. The addiÜonal hei,ht is necessa", 10 "commodate the partleulac use conducted in the buHdin.' and traffic cnptrnl, b. E"h required vacd abuttin. the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 feet parking s An Increase in height shall not block views designated bv the comnrehensive nlan demand and 5 Maximum hei.ht of the sanctua", or nrinclpal worship area may be increased to 55 feet if all oflhe following criteria are met management, a. Each required vard abutting the slmcture is increased one ft for each one ft. the stmcture exceeds 35 ft above ",rage building and traffic elevation movement to b. An incre",e in hd,ht shall not block views designated bv the comprehensive plan. the adjacent 6. Religious svmbols and icons for churches and other religious institutions may exceed the hl,hest noint oflhe underlving roof on street system. which It is mounted bv an addlÜonal15 ft. provided that such svmbol is a minor architectural accent and onlv one such svmbol is pennitted on the princinal stmcture for this use ~ Z Refer 10 § 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. "- 'l Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriate requirements. +- 2, For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII g, 10. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX L Fo,otherlnfonnanon about parking and parking are", see §22-1376 et "q. Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356. 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386-22-411, 22-431 -22-460respeclively. I ~ Fm details ofwh'lmay e",ed this heigh' limit. "e § 22-tO46 et "q. Fmdetail"e"acdingreq"iredyards.see§22-ll3letseq. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(15.35), 2-27-90; Ord. Nn. 93-170, § 7(Exh. H), 4-20-93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99.333, § 3, 1-19-99; Oed. No. 01-385, § 3, 4-3-01) Design Guidelines & Definilion of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A tO2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 19 Sec. 22-635. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be pennitted in the single family residential (RS) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find nse... THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS I MAXIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS en Z ~IO :¡ ~~~ ~ ~- u '" 0'> 0' USE:;j gjgjg: Church. synagogue or other place of religious worship co ~ ... 0' ...¡ Process As 130ft. IV established on the See note zoning ~ map. See note I. p'",e" t, n, It! ",d tV "TO d",ribod in §§~22-35t-22-356, 22-361 - 22-370 22-386-22-411 22-431 - 22-460, """"tivolv. ... ~ '" ~¡ v;~ '" < gj ¡§ ;:i CO ...> CO' ...¡U ",gj 2~ §ê ~t; 3õit above "verage building elevation. hen --co ::>~u 0':;:< gjo.B1 ZONE RS 30ft. [30ft. 175% See notes 3 - 6 l See noIe! 5 6 7 & ~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES I A I. Minimum]ot size per dwelling unit is as follows. transportation" In RS 35.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 35,000 sq. ft management b. In RS ]5.0 ,ones, the minimum ]otsize is ]5,000 sq. ft. plan (TMP) , In RS 9.6 zones, the minimum lot size is 9,600 sq. ft. shall be d.ln RS 72 zones, the minimum ]otsize is 7,200 sq. ft snbmitted as e. In RS 5.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 5,000 sq. ft. art fth 2. If the subject property. "long with any contiguous acea intended for futoce use for the celigious activities or ce]atOO purposes, is mMe ~ ]~ati~n. than 5 acres, the use. m.ust obtaina masterp]an approved through P~oee" IV. The master plan must show the ultimate development of the pp sote including all bm]dlngs, packing "nd ""cu]aUon "ceas, other m"Jor Ilnprovements and bulTers. For nrooo,,]s also ceou",", a The TMP <!<YeJopmenJ a",eement the,C'!)',ounci],s Dub]ic hearing on a deve]oDment,aereementsh"lI take the Dlace of the Dublic heacin, fM master shall address ~prova! bv the heacin, examine, the following: J. THe "!>joet prop'rt) mil) "Dtain a "etof) or ,imi]ac II ,lIi'g unit ro, '" '; th, "ligio" ]oad" ofth, "'g"gatio,. ]fthi, is a traffic 11"".,11 II ,lIi'g u,il, ito "t",k, ar." "t""lish,, fur "tach", 'liing ,oit, iA th, zoo, control, 4.TR,so!>joet.lOp'rtjmustb"dja"Rt'o",II"'oro,,",,i,lrightof II) parking 5. If any portion of a struetUlO on thesubject pooperty is located less than] 00 ft. from an adjacent low density zone, then eithe.. demand and a.Th,",ightoftRatpo"io,ofthosIR"tl"""alloot""",];a.abo',, ,mg,.oi]'iAg']' "ioA;or management, b. Thefacade of that portion of the struClulO pacalle] to the low density 'ooe shall not exceed 50 ft. in length and traffic 5. Maximum height of an v portion of the building may be inc'eased from 30 feet to 40 feet if all of the following are met: movement to a. The additional height is neces"", to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building' and the adjacent bEach IOQuilOd yard abutting the struetuce is incæased one ft. for each one ft. the StruetUlO exceeds 30 feet street system. c. An inc'",e in height shall not btock views d"i,nated bv th, compcehensive plan 6. Maximum height of the "nc!u=sipa] worship alOa may be mcceased to 55 feet of all of the following cntena are met a. Each IOouired vard abutting the struetuce is inClOased one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ft. above av""" building elevation b An inclO"se in height shall not block views d"i,nated bv the comprehensive plan 7. Architectura] extensions of fiat roomn" such as paraoets and articulated cornices may exceed the 30 ft. base height limit bv thlOe ft 8. Religious svmbo]s and icons fm churches and oth" religious institutions may exceed thehigh"t poinl of the underlying roof on which it is mounted bv an additional 15 ft provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is pennitted on the p,incioal struetuce fo, this use. .. L Parking may be located within cequiced side and real yacds, bul not c]os" than ]5 ft. to any property line e;. ~ Refer to § 22-946 et sen. to dete,mine what oth" provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property ~ 2c Ref" to Article XVll, Landscaping, fm appmpriate requioemen" J,). ill For sign IOquirements that apply 10 the pmject, see Artide XVtlI .uh lL Fo, community design guidelines that "pp]y to the project, see Artic]e XIX C For other infonnation about parking and parking aceas. see § 22-1376 et sen. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et sen. Fordetai]s regaldingrequilOd yards, see §22-113I et seq. (O<d. No. 90-43. § 2(20.25), 2-27-90; O<d. No. 93-]70, §7(E"'. B), 4-20-93; O,d. No. 97-29], § 3, 4-1-97: O<d. No. 99.333, § 3,1-19-99; O,d. No. 01-385, §3, 4-3-0t) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A 1þ2002 Code Publishing Co. Fi!e #03-1O0842-00-UP Page 20 Sec, 22-671. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be pennitted in the multifamily residential (RM) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use . .. THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS I MAXIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS '" z 0 ¡:: < ...¡ ;;;¡ " ¡.¡ USE 0: Church, synagogue or other place of religious worship i2 g 00: ~; ;;;¡¡:¡ Ct> gjgj 1 OJ ~ OJ f;j .... 0 ...¡ .... § '" 0: < gj Process IV 17,200 sq. ft. See note 1. Process I, II, III and IV are described in I §§22-351-22-356, 22-361-22-370, 22-386-22-411, 22-431 22-4 ~ ~ OJ ....> 00 ...¡u ",gj O;;;¡ ...."" :tu a;;;¡ -0: OJ.... :t", if] u < "- 0'" gja ~~ gj~ ZONE RM SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES In RM 3.6 and 2.4 zones, 30 ft. above average building elevation. InRM 1.8 zones, 35 ft. above average building elevation. See note! 4, 5 6 and 7 A 1. If the subject property, along with any contiguous area intended for future use for the religious activities or related purposes, is transportation more tlian 5 acres, the use must obtain a master plan approved through Process IV. The master plan must show the ultimate management development of the site including all buildings, parking and ci<culation areas, other major improvemen" and buffe". For plan (TMP) proposals also requiring a development agreement, the city council's public hearing on a development agreement shall take the shall be place of the public hearing for master plan approval by the hearing examiner submitted as 2. The subject property may contain a rectory or similar dwelling unit for use by the religious leader of the congregation. tfthis is part of the a detached dwelling unit, its setbacks are asestablished for detached dwelling units in the zone. I' r 3. The subject property must be adjacent to a collector or arterial right-of-way. i: ~~;n. 1.I"n; pollioR ofaotructu" ORth"ul>joctFwP'", is I"aloct I"cthan 1001\. from a 10 d'Rsi~ aOR', th'R ,ithor e a. Th,h,ight of that portioR ofth"tmctu"chall Rut """d I> A. aFR " orag' buildiRg ,I, atiOR; or shalladdr~ss b.TR'fusadcofthatpollioRof\h,st",",u"parall,ltotH,lo d,nci~'Rn"haIlRotox",d5QI\.iRI'ngth. the followmg: 4 Maximum height of an v oortion of the building mav be increased from 30 feet in RM 3.6 and RM 2.4 ,ones and 35 feet in RM traffic 1.8 zones t040 feet if all of the following are met. control, a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building' and parking b. Each "Quiced vard abutting the strucruce is increased nne ft. foe each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ft in RM 36 and RM demand and 2.4 zones and 35 feet in RM 1.8 zones above avemge building elevation. management, c. An increase in height shall not block views designated bv the comNehensive plan. and traffic 5. Maximum height ofthesanctuarv or principal wo"hio area mav be ineeeased to 55 feet ifall of the following criteria are met: movement to a. Each ceuuired yard abutting the structure is incceased one ft. for each one ft. the structuce exceeds 35 ft. above average the adjacent building elevation. street system. b. An increase in height shall not block views designated bv the comocchensive olan 6. Acehitectural extensions of flat rooflines such as parape" and articulated comices mav exceed the 30 ft. base height limit bv three ft 7. Religious svmbols and icons for chucehes and other religious institutions mav exceed the highest ooint of the underlving roof on which it is mounted bv an additional 15 ft. provided that such svmbol is a minor architectuml accent and onlv one such svmbol is permitted on the orincipal structure for th~ use. ~ 1L Parking may be located within required side and rear yards, but not closer than 15 ft. to any property line. ~ '" Refeno § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. 'h ill Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping. for appropriate cequicements &0 LL For sign requiremen" that apply to the project, see Article XVIII 00 ß For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Micle XIX I For other information about parking and parking areas. see § 22-1376 et seq. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1 046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(25.35),2-27-90; Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B). 4-20-93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-385. § 3, 4-3-01; Ord. No. 02-426. § 3. 10-15-02) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibil A <92002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1O0842-00-UP Page 21 22-755 Schools - Day care facilities - Churches. The following uses shall be pennitted in the community business (Be) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use. ::: Minimums j ~ Required Yards ;::¡ u " e "' ",0.. 0: .~ ~ g..¡; ~~ 20 ft. 0 ft. 0 ft. 55 ft. above Schools'and day I. If any ponion of a struetu,. on the subject pmpeny is located less than 100 It. fmm an adjacent residential zone, then that ponion of See notes I and 11 average care: the structure shall not exceed 30 It. above average building elevation and the structure shall be "t back a minimum of20 fi. fmm the building Determined on a pmperty line of the residential zone elevation for case-by-case 2. Except for gyms, if approved thmugh process III, the height ofa structure may exceed 35 fi. above average building elevation to a gyms if basis maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following criteria are met. located 100 a. The additional height is necessal)' to accommodate the panicular use conducted in the building; and, . ft. or more A transportation ele~at;:~;ha~ti"d yard abutting the struetu,. is inc,.ased five ft for each nne ft. the struetu" exceeds 35 ft. above average buildmg frd~m an mlana(gTeMmpen) t c. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject pmpeny as established by the comp,.hensive a ~acent p an plan "sldentml shall be 3. For any structure, including gyms, an increa" in height above 35 ft. shall not block views designated by the comprehensive plan zone submitted as 4. Religious "mho]s and icons for churches and other religious institutions mav exceed the highest point of the underlving roof on part of the which it is mounted bv an additional] 5 ft. provided that such svmbol is a minor architectural "cent and on Iv one such svmbo] is 35 ft. above application. The permitted on the principal structure fprthis use average TMP shall "2c Church facilities may contain a reçtory or similar dwelling unit for u" by the religious leader of the cong"g"ion building address the"'", Day care facilities must contain an outdoor play area with at least 75 sq ft for each child using the area at anyone time. This play elevation for following: a,.a must be completely enc]o"d by a solid fence or other screen at least six ft. in height Play equipment and struetu,.d play areas must all other traffic control, be "t back at least five ft. from each property line structures parking demand ó, L Day care facilities may include accessory living facilities as defined by § 22-]. and 'l-, IL Day care ]àcilities and schools must comply with the ,.quirements of the State Department of Socia] and Health S""ices andlor the See notes I management, State Superintendent of Public Instruetion. -;I 4 and traffic "':L All activities pertaining to schools, business or voc"iona] schools, or trade schools, such as auto-repair or other uses that may - movement to the impact adjacent propenies, must take place within an enclosed building. adjacent street ~ ~ No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, t i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surf"e water facilities, etc. sys em. We LL For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Micle XIX -l-k R For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Micle XVlI ~ 1..1 For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII ß l1, Refer to § 22-946 etseq. to deteO11ine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject propeny -l-k ß Schoo], may locate containers on-site for the storage of emergency preparedness supplies as an "cessory use. Containers may not be located in any required yard Landscaping may be required by the director of community development services to screen the installation if the proposed location will be visible from a public right-of-way andlor neighboring properties. Siting is subject to review and approval undet process I, Site Plan Review, unless proposed as a component of another project: in which case the siting of the container will be reviewed as pan of the overall development proposal and subject to the underlying review process. L Foroth" infoO11";on abo,tporlcing andpack;ng oreas, see § 22-]376 et seq. USE " N '" .3 1 " '" ¡;; ¡¡ .:: SChOOls"-jrocess lIlNone business or vocational Possible schools, or Process trade schools III Day care I See note facilities, 2 except Class II home occupations Church. synagogue or other place of religious worship Proce"I,II,Ill~dlVoredescribedin I §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370 22-386-22-4tt. 22-43L -22-460. respee.ve]v. USE ZONE CHART . THEN, across for REGULA nONS @ ~ '" ~ ~~ ;¡:", g ]~ ~~ """ ZONE BC SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES l Fordelail, ofwh" may "",d ihis height limit, '" §22.]046 et seq. Fo,detailstOganlingraq,iradyards,see§22.1131 etseq. (Ord. No. 90-43 § 2(45.65), 2-27-90: o.-d. No. 93-]70, § 7(Exh. B), 4-20-93;o.-d. No. 96-270, § 5, 7-2-96:0rd. No. 97-291, § 3,4-]-97: O,d. No. OI.J85, § J,4-J-OI:O,d. No. 0]-399 § 3, 8.7-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A (Ç)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 22 MEETING DATE: May 20,2003 ITEM# .=¡z:. r9- \ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Belle Meadow Final Plat, File No. 02-105406-00-SU CATEGORY: ~ CONSENT ~ RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS BUDGET IMPACT: 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0 $0 $none ----.--- ATTACHMENTS: April 29, 2003, staff report with attachments to City Council/Land Use Transportation Committee, including draft Final Plat Resolution. ---------------. ----------- SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted a request for final plat approval for the 37 lot Belle Meadow residential subdivision. (The Plat is also known as Danville Station Division I). The Federal Way City Council approved the Belle Meadow preliminary plat on September 12,2000. The City Council Land UselTransportation Committee (LUTe) reviewed the final plat application at their May 5, 2003 meeting. .--------------.-----------------.....-.-..---.------ ----------- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC voted to recommend approval of the final plat application to the full City Council. ---------..--.-------------------------------- PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Resolution approving the final Plat of Belle Meadow." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~--_._._------------------------------ -.----------- (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 Doc, I,D, #22962 ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way MEMO RAND UM DATE: April 29, 2003 To: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee Deb Barker, Associate Planner W David ~anager Belle Meado~~~at Þtat Application Federal Way File #O2-105406-00-SU FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Land Use/Transportation Comminee forward to the City Council a recommendation approving the Belle Meadow Final Plat Resolution. II. SUMMARY OF ApPLICA TION/EXHIBITS This application requests final plat approval for Belle Meadow, a subdivision of 37 single-family lots on 9.8 acres. The Federal Way City Council granted preliminary plat approval for the 37 lot residential subdivision on October 17, 2000. The Belle Meadow subdivision is located east of21" Avenue SWat the intersection ofSW 3451h Place and 18th Avenue SW. Zoning for the site at the time of application was and continues to be Residential Single-Family (RS 7.2). Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 20-136, the City Council may approve the fmal plat application only if all criteria of FWCC Section 20-I36(b), are met. Findings and conclusions contained in the staff report to the City Council and referenced in the resolution indicate that the application is consistent with these criteria. The following exhibits are included with this memorandum: Exhibit A, Vicinity Map; Exhibit B, Final Plat Map; Exhibit C, Resolution; and Exhibit D, Staff Report (with attachments). III. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION The final decision for final plats rest with the City Council in accordance with FWCC Section 20-136(b). Bringing this matter before the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee for review and recommendation prior to the full Council is consistent with how land use matters are currently processed by the City. IV. PROPOSED MOTION I move that the Land Userrransportation Committee forward to the City Council, and place on the May 20, 2003, City Council consent agenda, a recommendation approving the Belle Meadow Final Plat Resolution, Doc. 1.0, #22792 RESOLUTION NO. - OR~f1 5/J1¿ ;; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF BELLE MEADOW, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, FILE NO. 02-10S406-00-SU WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 00-1003 I 8-00-SU, was approved subject to conditions on October 17,2000, by Federal Way Resolution No. 00-325; and WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfied all of the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 00-325 and in the September 12,2000, Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted the application for final plat for Belle Meadow within the required time of receiving approval for the above-referenced preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services and Public Works Department staff have reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Federal Way Hearing Examiner, and their analysis and conclusions are set forth in the April 29, 2003, Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council Land Useffransportation Committee considered the application for the Belle Meadow final plat at its May 5, 2003, meeting and recommended approval by the full City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Staff Report and the application for final plat for Belle Meadow during the Council's May 20, 2003, meeting; Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. 1. The final plat for Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 02-105406-00-SU, is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat and is in conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was deemed complete. Res. # _Page I Final Plat of Belle Meadow /Doc ID # 22778 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase ofthis resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date, This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this- day of ,2003. City of Federal Way Mayor, Jeanne Burbidge Attest: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC Approved as to Form: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No: Res. # _Page 3 Final Plat of Belle Meadow I Doc ID # 22778 BELLE MEADOW FINAL PLAT r--- s.w. 320th ~ VICINITY MAP APPROX. SCAlE "1"=2 Miles ¡ ! ¡ EXHIBIT A i , PAGE-L-OF --L ¡ ~.~ .~ DANVILLE STATION DIVISION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 24, TWP, 21 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. City of Federal Way, King County, Washington ."".".... ;~:::':~:;~,~.:.:~ ,::': ~~---_. "- ~~~ g:,~~~ t~};~~]:~:~[~~~:~~~:1~'~~:=~~" :i::¡;'~:oi::~;~'" ~... "..~" ~ "". ..~""~ "....,,~~,,~. ..,~~, .!.~~ iE',,:;;: ~~.¡%~!=;:. ::::::::::.~ ~, _..~. -"'~. .... . 0"" ~, ~"""" " .~ "AA",'" , "'0 .. ~ ,~ ,~"-""'~,~"...,,,..C>"~,~, ;§iìfl!!lP'~:-':- ~'t;.-i'.:;¡~~----- :..~:t.:': ~::'o:::';",."" ¡i:~';';= ;r¿¡;;:::t ((6 /¿-,/.v- ""7) """"""""""'" ,....~..~,.,~ '00"" ~ -",,-- ~ri~~[~~~~:}E~ .: ';¡ ,;' ;, ~ "' '~:: "7;~!i:;~1~1;~~' ~,.,~"."" ? f \ """~..~'""~\~~) "'..,~.."-~--- :f~;?~iJt!~;i~¿:~~':- ,':::;:;:~.~:':':.;:: ~ ..'" "'V"'~' ,."", ~"' _1,,-,~,,-jL 1MBJ.;! ¡:¡:~!J#.~~:;':::t:;r;~.~;g,t\q~f ~{~~l~)¡¡~::"~;' ",..,---->Lo..tl~2______- ~:':;:"::'":,i\,,. .t~1WO ., ~'",M"'¡:;:~'..ltW~ iJj~~~~. 5~i1!~~.:¡..:,.=:; '\Wiì~ :Æ:~ ~~:~, ~'~:;;;~1~~;: ~~.:'_~~;um ~~¡Æ~rf:§£i,:: "....".,,~.. ,"""M'" ""'-""------------ .,-,-,,"","',,"""".,"'-------- ÆDEAAL WAY ALE No. 02-1O5406-OO-su _ET 1 OF 4 W><ß.O' w>Y ",.,,"'", "' CO""""," ,,~, ""'" "-"--"~M'_.,," ~,,~ "~, om_", ~:.::::.::..w.::..?:o"~;~~,w ~:::;;';<;:;N;'~:':;'~ .~:::""'N~ ..,-,,~- ~'~""N-""-"" ~,--"'~~ ~i;;~~rf.~~1~if¡~~¡'~l:~~ ~m ~'!~" ,.,-","---,..-:.. """"~,.;¡¡¡¡- """ ""'"" ~~~"r~;!¿!::¡¡":¡¡:~ ~,~~~f~\>'4 ~,~,:;,w:¡~¡':,'~~:-M:";¡:':~~o::~~,' , ~_..o~"~~'",_u~""'-'--""~'""~"M~""'WOM " - ~~.~ ~~ ~,,~ ... ..,- ~~ .- .~.~, OM ~.~, W .~~,~. ~ ..- ._, "" ~~. ~~ ,,' ...~ ~~ oc- " =, - -"""'4 -" ...~ '.' -, M~. ...."-,,, ,. ,- -~, --"". ,. '.,-,,~, , """-"~~'~~"~U~M"~_""W"'~H~_.m~'~,,"," co' ,_.. " "'~4 ~.., """"'< ". ~""' "'M","' . ""~.æ"".,""-">I""""""W>-"";"OC~"AA""~"'. ~"H"~'M"'_""_~ :..,;;",,~,',;: M "'~ - --, ~'-m " ,,~ ro '"'" ,,~ ~OC' ,,-... ~"". :o..::t":::::w.",~.i'~.::":':¡¡"~':¡,~J='" ,""~'4 ."~..,,,~ :.."::~.~ M "'~ - --, W ~"""' ,.. -~", ..~ ...a, ,,~~, .."'" , ~'WroM~""'_"~,w,~."""-"~~",~~"~"",,,,,,,-,",, '"'~' " .."-,, ro o~~~ "...~ -", ,,~ - ,,~~, ..-. -"'-"" . """""-"""""""'""""'-"'-~~roM"'~"'_,~~ .. '. ,~"""" -,,~. - ~=~, ... ~~, ~ ~,..,,- ~~ . ".~.~ ,~ '" ¡r"¡;1i:!:?"!E;:::~:""':'::::'~::'".;::::~;:'i':..~~~~"~,':Io':"~, ~-:::':"';;"=,~N"Œ ""'. - """'~"..~, ~...".. o,,~ ,~.. "'. '" ,_... ,. "....~~ ~ "N4 M"~O ""'. "".".'-~""~'~Œ'_~'~ -~"'~O'~-"'~""-~"'" ~"""~'~~"'~"~~'"M EXHIBIT -Þ PAGE ,~.oFL DANVILLE STATION DIVISION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC, 24, TWP. 21 N" AGE, 3 E, W.M, City of Federal Way, King County, Washington Mro'~ ~,."",,- -;¡¡-- - - - - - - - - - - - -""""'-;w:;-,-"""'-- - - - - - - - - - ~;,.,.. 2.4~S I :1 ~."". or" I'.. r r!---------------T----------------_J~, I t'.. _CT'A' 'J)' 1 ".71' , nn SW344TH PL ' I 1 ,~ 4 I 28 1 1 . I ~ I 1 :~ ~ 5 ~ 3 2 1 -CT 'B' ~ ~ 27 ~ I 1 I ~!I! !I! !I! ~ I 1 ~~. ~ ~ ~ 28 ~ I I.,~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ I I:;'¡¡§ . 10 " 12 13 14 15 ; 25 ~: I I~¡þ. 8 I ' ¡ 1 I" nn N89'274O'E ~"'" , I LJ! "'--- - -- --- -_'!!!:~'U'l..'....L. ~'!!>',-'!!.'- --- - - - -- - - - - - - J i~í¡ ~I I: i .,'. " :"'!ffP"'~ ~I ;,: ~:"~:'::o\'~ ^ c^N< ~' ", " - -~=-""-""""'""""ill'.'" ~gè<~;-6/i6-2'~\ ---~ I ~J"!'~",,~, =----~ - - - SW 3471>< PL - - , ell"-',.'" ". I I ' T ::'=~'~, I.;. "00 ':"":~ '00 1 I - --- '--': I LJ--__- 'L::~~._--~ ~'""'--- - -- ----- - -- - - --.,j. ~ 25 "'M'.', """ 25 30 ~!.J::r.~.:'~.. . ¡~',::rl'.~w.., I " il Ii ~Ð_~ 8EC,""""."N.ROE.3E.WM ~ M ~ ..=,~, ~'M"'-" ..".,...,. ",.., ~ ,..",- ~...n'-" .... '" I1EAIHIO M_""" -,~""'""'oo.~.. ,. ,.~..~ ~ "" ... , ." " .... " '~M"'_M~-""- .....",."..., ......,.,., , ~'~~""'OO""~"H'" , ._,oo"",,,",,~...,~..,.,.,,~... ..-"~'""..m,,.oo..... .m". ..~ 00_' " ~" - ~""" ,..00.. .."'.. ','-'-"~."~-"".'.'.""" ,.. '" "..~ '. .., "~,..,, , "" ~.- """ ~ ,"f"-" , .~...,"',..,_..." ",.._ø...- , ._,~"'.~.~,~.....oo,,'~- ...~""-".~,."~"",,........, ~, ~. " ..~.~ ." e, ,m , ..,~._."m"'-"',",.~ "'f'-" SEE SHEET 1 OF 4 FOR ADDITJDNAL NOTES DAI..E'¡mo~:':?"..~' INC. "",;~'f.; ,~;~~';g,;°t,~m¡"", FEDEf!AL WAY FILENo. 02-105406-00-00 SHEET 2 OF 4 ~E~6"'~ EXHIBIT B PAGE ~OF ~ DANVILLE STATION DMSION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 24, 1WP. 21 N, RGE.3 E., W.M. City of Federal Way, King County, Washington //[~Mi¡¡:¡i"'~"'"' ""...- : .. \ . .~t¡i . '. ~!;.~~~r~r.I~i.~~~~::;~.~~~~~.w;; 1!;¡:!.H2.00'~H'H"~,-,,.2" .. ¡¡;,'1i!"'..¡""Iii;'¡~ ~'CT "A' ! ¡~ ! ¡; ~ ..I:~'u [~ I; '- -.i " h 2 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ :;,~~. ...-. \, ~m,""'" :i. ." i!¡'I-"!~-i"""""~-I"".~-,r"".~-~:;,:;"..~'::!fiŒ' :, .!é'~"'~'... """'E"~¡:""~"""~""'"" : ""Œ' ~'~ I"~ H2,OO' i'I.~':, i i ,¡I!~ih. . 1..~!I!~,!i""""'E"'7r.,"'m"'E .,., i "--'I;;'¡---o'~""o~.<.o"""."'OO."'OO .""""""" '1"':1'..' ',~"" :.~~'a! :".00' "'" "'" ".,,' ",,' ",'" "00: d§ lB. """~'E i ¡í I"i ! ~:!¡:¡:~~ ::;~~::E jai!li'~I..~~,h.~, i~.::.i~.~,i~.~.i~.,~,i~,,\~.i~ 'I ,:Ii . ."'.00' ':HI""~"...,...""".u,-,,,"""""'.""""'."""H"."""'.."'~ . i ¡ ii; ':,!::~:~,~~.'r~ .1' O~'~!!~:"-"Ö¡-" "."";c"--,,.r ou"-õr. .-"-6"" m¡~:' l"l' ~.'oo,E:"¡W' --' 'oi;~;"N89'27."'.'E1275.7.',~"ViI;i:mM!\:\'.~"'^.- ¡,-~,;,!." M'¡;'~~\;;' . \.,i,;;,~~;;::~,,¡,,:~~~s~'3.i51H'PC- ¡ UNPCAnED UNPCAnED '. Ib I: 1* '" "I" , I I 1 I " I.': 1 ;~ ~'I!¡ ~h' ~> 'I . <"O! . ~il:' ". 'l I!. ,I' " 1'1 I I I I ŒWHC 8CALE . 0". - - - - 'r / " /""'~~""'; ~ "'-, 1 I." ,.1 I \ "- {1w~él.'fi!.~I:I'::t~,..~ '",:,_:':'iŒ< ,~"'.:,>" LEGEND . . ~,.~o~~,._-","",.,. "~,"",,","'-"O_'" . , " ,. ,..,,~ .." ." "..,"' "' "'" "..", 0". ." ~'" "..' ."" "'~, ""-,,. '" ~._œ.~" ~"" Œ' SEE SHEETS 1 AND 2 OF 4 FOA ADDfTlONAL NOTES :";~~J~':: FEDERAL WAY FILE No, 02-105406-00-00 StEET"OF4 EXHIBIT B PAGE3-0F .1L- ~I "I il -!. " \' , I ,\ I "" I'"~ ,I I > I ,:¡ ~'Iil "h' ~~I'i fit:; I,'! l.f I I I 'I '-~ , 01 ~I - DANVILLE STATION DMSION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1,14, SE 1/4, SEC. 24, 1WP. 21 N, RGE, 3 E" W.M. C~y of FederalWay, King County, Washington FED,RAL WAY :L;ÒD~~,~i;Dgg~~O404' .m..;rÉ~~7I' "~,' 'I',' ",. '~,'~'I':I/,~,~A~~;~~. i!?)<,;r,¡lH~~'- ¡¡¡'VJ1;.~~:.\:I,\~\'~~"- - ~. '~~{., '\ ~..':,\~~ I{:{¡,y,i. '-->ML"--".,"--- ..-",,"-_! '--',.'"::- '_:';,QL! '--""""",,0 "',O!L' f.it~.: "~ \~:¡¡j,¡.~i~~"" ',1"""~, ~ ~, ~, ~ ~,~ ~"""'\""'t'",:;,,,,"':~~~'" ~¡ ~7 H 30 i ~ 35 i ~ 34 i § 33 H 32 i ~ 31 i~ 30 ~ ~ 29 i~ ! L 0\ 27 ~"'I"m"",z""Z""'Z'~'Z""Z""Z""§""'."'I"":"\":'i' i""""" ',HI """ ',~' "., ,~~.. ,.",~.. un "", ',", ~., u" "" """"'1 ~ê !I! ,,:~',,:" '¡"",""" "",.~., ",.",~., ",.",~., ."",~., """,~., "",,~., ",.,,',,"' "",,~J, ~:s~¡: "".' """'"",o'",oo"".',,,oo"oo"oo"'oo'~,oo'i<""!' ! I,:, ~¡I:: ~', ,:ff~", ;;, ~ > > ~ ~ > ~ > 1 1~~::~::!::,~:~~)¡,'::'~::!¡:::::~~ .i: ; ,"N89'2':.'r.E~1'Z,;7.' ,\:,,'.'~,',:~,,:~iJ¡~,I" "~3'.15rH'PL~ ; ~ z 0 ~ I õ . , "~" ~; ~¡~~~ , ~~~ ~~a~ ~, " ~~i- UNPLAn,o <>WHO 6CALE '¡,,_.J U 'i //----', /,~""~~, \ '" I I I." ,01 I \ 0- fl~.1,,:\:;"""Ii'lt.I:NI~""'~ "--: _:~'l~' , l.::~'~). J.E<mL . ~'"~'"' . ,.. . _..~~",.m"~"'Mn"" .........,.",..~,~",,-"" . ""'".~~.."'"'""'~"'" "' ""' ,,~""' ~,~ ." ~'" .~, ..~" ~,-" ~"~".,~,.._..."'.,-" ~, SEE SHEETS 1 AND 2 OF 4 FOR ADOtTlONAL NOTES O.<1.E'(;~!':~' NC, ."~;~',~;~ ,~\;~:g;'~AAm'J!"" FEDEML WAY ALE No. 02-1O5400-DO-SU SHEET 4 OF 4 ~~~ EXHIBIT ß PAGE~OF ~ RESOLUTION NO.- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF BELLE MEADOW, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, FILE NO. 02-10S406-00-SU WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 00-1003 I8-00-SU, was approved subject to conditions on October 17,2000, by Federal Way Resolution No. 00-325; and WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfied all of the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 00-325 and in the September 12, 2000, Recommendation ofthe Federal Way Hearing Examiner; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted the application for final plat for Belle Meadow within the required time of receiving approval for the above-referenced preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services and Public Works Department staff have reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Federal Way Hearing Examiner, and their analysis and conclusions are set forth in the April 29, 2003, Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee considered the application for the Belle Meadow final plat at its May 5, 2003, meeting and recommended approval by the full City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Staff Report and the application for final plat for Belle Meadow during the Council's May 20, 2003, meeting; Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. l. The final plat for Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 02-1O5406-00-SU, is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat and is in conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was deemed complete. Res. # _Page 1 C. EXHIBIT ~inal Plat of Belle Meadow / Doc 10 # 22778 PAGE-L-OF -3- 2. Based on inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report which are adopted herein by reference and on the City Council's review of the application for final plat, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provision for public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, play grounds, and schools and school grounds as are required by City Code, or are necessary and appropriate, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. 3. The public use and interest will be served by the final plat approval granted herein. 4. All conditions listed in the Federal Way Resolution No. 00-325 and the conditions listed in the September 12, 2000, Recommendation of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner, have been satisfied, and/or satisfaction of the conditions have been sufficiently guaranteed by the applicant as allowed by Federal Way City Code Section 20-135. 5. All required improvements have been made and/or sufficient bond, cash deposit, or assignment of funds have been accepted as guaranty for completion and maintenance of all required plat improvements, as identified in the April 29, 2003, Staff Report. 6. All taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid or will be paid, prior to recording the final plat. Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the Findings and Conclusions contained in Section I above, the final plat of Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 02-I05406-00-SU, is approved subject to satisfaction of compliance with plat conditions and conditions required by the Public Works Director as identified in the Staff Report and as required by applicable codes and policies. Section 3. Recording. The approved and signed final plat, together with all legal instruments pertaining thereto as required pursuant to all applicable codes, shall be recorded by the applicant in the King County Department of Records. The applicant shall pay all recording fees. Res. # _Page 2 EXHIBIT C PAGE~OF ~ Final Plat of Belle Meadow I Doc ID # 22778 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITy. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this- day of ,2003. City of Federal Way Mayor, Jeanne Burbidge Attest: City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC Approved as to Form: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No: Res. # _Page 3 EXHIBIT Co 1> PAGE ~OF Final Plat of Belle Meadow I Doc ID # 22778 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT Request for Final Plat Approval I. BELLE MEADOW FINAL PLAT (AKA Danville Station Division I) Federal Way File No. 02-1O5406-00-SU RECOMMENDATION City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the final plat of Belle Meadow for compliance with preliminary plat conditions and all applicable codes and policies, and recommends approval of the final plat application. II. INTRODUCTION Date: Request: Description: Owner: Engineer: Location: Sewage Disposal: Water Supply: April 29, 2003 Request for final plat approval for Belle Meadow Subdivision. Belle Meadow Subdivision is a proposed subdivision of37 single-family lots on a 9.8-acre site. Access for Belle Meadow Subdivision is via IS'h Avenue South from the north and SW 345'h Place from the east. All required roads, sidewalks, storm drainage facilities, sewer lines, and water lines have been constructed in accordance with preliminary plat approval granted by the City Council on October 17,2000, or financially guaranteed in accordance with the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). Schneider Homes, 206-248-2471 Dennis Alfredson, PE 6510 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Sean Reinicke, 253-333-2200 DMP, Inc. 726 Auburn Way North Auburn, W A 98002 NE in Section 24 Township 21 North, Range 03 East, W.M, Federal Way, King County (see Exhibit A - Vicinity Map) Lakehaven Utility District Lakehaven Utili.y District EXHIBIT .l> PAGELoF ~ Fire Dept: Federal Way Fire Department School Dist: Federal Way School District Prepared By: Deb Barker, Associate Planner III. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND The Belle Meadow Subdivision is a proposed subdivision of37single-famiIy lots on 9.8 acres (Exhibit B - Final Plat Map). The Belle Meadow Subdivision Preliminary Plat (Exhibit c- Preliminary Plat Map) was granted approval by the Federal Way City Council on October 17, 2000, per Resolution 00-325 (Exhibit D - Preliminary Plat Resolution). Zoning for the 9.8 acre site is RS 7.2, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. Lot sizes on the final plat range from 7,294 square feet to 9,442 square feet, with the average size being approximately 7,808 square feet. The developer applied for final plat approval on December 3, 2002. Improvements installed under Engineering Application Number 00-106I40-00-EN are now substantially complete or bonded. The final plat application was determined complete on April 1 0, 2003. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.110 and FWCC Section 20-136, the City Council is charged with determining whether: I) the proposed final plat conforms to all terms of the preliminary plat approval; 2) if the subdivision meets the requirements of all applicable state laws and local ordinances that were in effect at the time of preliminary plat approval; 3) if all taxes and assessments owing on the property have been paid; and 4) if all required improvements have been made or sufficient security has been accepted by the City. City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the final plat of Belle Meadow Subdivision for compliance with preliminary plat conditions and all applicable codes and policies. All applicable codes, policies, and plat conditions have been met. A proposed resolution of the City of Federal Way, Washington, to approve the final plat Belle Meadow Subdivision is enclosed (Exhibit E - Draft Resolution of Final Plat Approval). IV. COMPLIANCE WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS The following lists conditions of preliminary plat approval in the same order referenced in Federal Way City Council Resolution 00-325. Required improvements have been completed as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135. The applicant has provided a written response to the Examiner's conditions (Exhibit F - Response to Hearing Examiner Conditions). Hearing Examiner Conditions of Approval Related to Final Plat Application 1. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a landscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following elements: A. Required ten foot Type III arterial street landscape buffer along the 21" Avenue SW frontage. Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report EXHIBIT FileNo. 02-IO5406-00-SU I Doc.ID 022419 PAGE~OFI Page 2 Staff Response: This condition has been met. A landscape plan depicting Tract A was approved by the Department of Community Development Services in conjunction with review and approval of the engineering plans. Tract A provides a vegetative buffer from the 21" Avenue SW arterial and contains trees, shrubs, and groundcover in confonnance with FWCC Section 20-178. The vegetation has been planted, inspected and approved. Provisions for ownership and maintenance are identified in note #9 of page I of 4 of the final plat document. B. Open space area landscaping. Staff Response: This condition is met in that the applicant has elected to make a payment for fee-in-lieu-of installing on-site open space. Therefore, as no on-site open space is provided, landscaping for open space areas is not required. C. Street trees in planter strips inside plat boundaries along the 21" Avenue SW frontage. Staff Response: This condition has been met. A landscape plan depicting right-of-way landscape planter strips was approved by the Public Works Department in conjunction with review and approval ofthe engineering plans. The street trees have been planted, inspected, and approved. D. Significant tree replacement plan. Staff Response: This condition has been met. A tree preservation plan (in the fonD of a clearing and grading limits plan) consistent with the preliminary plat approval was approved by the Department of Community Development Services in conjunction with review and approval of the engineering plans. The applicant has complied with the approved clearing limits during the plat infrastructure construction phase. Clearing of individual lots will occur in conjunction with construction of homes on each of the individual lots. As no significant trees were removed with the plat infrastructure construction phase, tree replacement was not required. E. Visual screening of the stonnwater infiltration tract from the right-of-way with landscaping and/or fencing. Staff Response: This condition has been met. A landscape plan for visual screening of Tract B was approved by the Department of Community Development Services in conjunction with review and approval of engineering plans. The perimeter of Tract B has been planted with trees and shrubs; the vegetation has been inspected and approved. In addition, a four-foot tall chain link fence has been installed. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the existing structures on Lots 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 37 must be removed or relocated to confonn to building setbacks requirements as established by the FWCC, or lot lines must be adjusted accordingly. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The structures have been eliminated from the subject site. Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report EXH I B IT"'1\. File No. 02-1 05406-00-SU I Doc. LD¡,:~~~ PA~C ~ ~ 3. Final plat approval of the Belle Meadow subdivision shall occur simultaneously with, or subsequent to, final plat approval of the adjacent Keller subdivision, in order to extend and provide access from SW 34SIh Place in the configuration indicated on the preliminary plat drawing. Alternatively, prior to issuance of construction pennits, the preliminary plat drawing shall be revised and submitted to the City for approval to indicate a revised access configuration from SW 34Sth Place to the Belle Meadow subdivision that meets all applicable City and Fire Department requirements. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Engineering plans for the both the Belle Meadow preliminary plat and the Keller preliminary plat (known by the applicant as Danville Station Division II and located immediately south of the Belle Meadow plat), were submitted on December 22, 2000. Both preliminary plats received Engineering Authorization to Proceed on March IS, 2002. Belle Meadow improvements have been constructed, but only a portion of the Keller improvements have been installed, prohibiting the Keller subdivision from being recorded at this time. On October 3, 2002, the City outlined conditions that would allow the Belle Meadow preliminary plat to be recorded first. On October 14,2002, Schneider Homes, Inc. agreed to those conditions (Exhibit G - Applicant Acceptance Letter). The intent of the original condition was to provide safe access and adequate drainage facilities for all lots within Belle Meadow, which shares SW 34SIh Place frontage and associated drainage from SW 34SIh Street (the Keller preliminary plat). In its letter, the City required SW 34SIh Place to be fully constructed, associated right-of-way within the Keller Preliminary plat to be dedicated, improvements on 2 I" Avenue to be completed for both projects, and the stonnwater facilities within the Keller preliminary plat to be constructed, with an easement in favor of the City in place. The conditions have been met and the intent of the original condition has been satisfied. 4. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall revise the plat to redesign the southwest comer ofSW 34SIh Place and 20lh Avenue SW to construct a half-street improvement, including a minimum of 20 feet of pavement, curb, gutter, streetlights, a four- foot planter strip with street trees, and a five-foot sidewalk along the entire Lot 9 frontage. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The construction approval documents (File #00- 1O6I40-00-EN) depicted the southwest comer ofSW 3451h Place at 20th Avenue SW with half- street improvements, including a minimum of 20 feet of pavement, curb, gutter, streetlights, a four-foot planter strip with street trees, and a five-foot sidewalk along the entire Lot 9 frontage. 5. Prior to issuance of construction penn its, the applicant shall revise the plat to remove the radius ofthe west right-of-way line of 20th Avenue SW along the proposed Lot 8 ITontage. The west right-of-way line of20lh Avenue SW along the proposed Lot 8 ITontage shall be redesigned to be perpendicular to the southern property line of the site and parallel to the 21 " Avenue SW right-of-way. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The approved engineering plans (File #00- 1O6140-00-EN) depicted 20lh Avenue SW right-of-way line perpendicular to the southern property line of lot 8 and parallel to the 21" Avenue SW Right-of-way. 6. Prior to issuance of construction penn its, the applicant shall revise the plat to correctly label 20lh Avenue SW and 161h Avenue SW, which are not currently shown. Belle Meadow Fioal Plat Staff Report File No. 02-105406-00-SU / 000. t.D. #22419 Page 4 EXHIBIT PAGF q ~F ~ Staff Response: This condition has been met. Approved engineering plans under File #00- 1O6140-00-EN correctly depicted 20'" Avenue SW and I6'h Avenue SW. In addition, the final plat correctly depicts these streets as well. 7. The applicant shan acquire, or arrange for dedication in a fonn acceptable to the City, sufficient off-site right-of-way as indicated on the Preliminary Plat between the northern property line of the site and the SW 3441h Street right-of-way for the extension of 18th Avenue SW. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shan submit evidence of ownership, or arrangements for dedication in a fonn acceptable to the City, of the required I8'h Avenue SW off-site right-of-way for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Ri~ht of way for the northerly extension of 18'" Avenue SW between the subject site and SW 344' Street was obtained in a statutory warranty deed recorded under file number 2002042900-122 I. This street was improved in conjunction with site improvements. 8. Prior to final plat approval, the section of SW 344'h Street from 21" Avenue SW to I 81h A venue SW, including the fun intersection of SW 344'h Street and 181h A venue SW, shan be constructed, approved, and dedicated to the City. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The required street improvements on SW 3441h Street, including the fun intersection, have been constructed in conjunction with this preliminary plat, as well as with the extension of the sewer line, and with the construction of the Twin Lakes Park and Ride, located on the north side ofSW 3441h Street. 9. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for two speed humps, one on SW 3441h Place and one on SW 345'h Place, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The speed humps shall be designed and located to discourage potential cut-through traffic into adjoining neighborhoods. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Approved engineering plans depicted the required speed humps consistent with this condition of approval. The speed humps were installed in conjunction with roadway improvements for the plat. 10. Prior to issuance of construction pennits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for a raised pedestrian crosswalk at the regional BP A trail crossing on SW 3441h Place, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Approved engineering plans depicted a raised pedestrian crosswalk at the BPA Trail crossing located at the intersection ofSW 3441h Place at 141h Way SW, at the entrance to the Parklane Estates Division II neighborhood. The raised crossing and associated signage was instaned in conjunction with roadway improvements for the Belle Meadow plat. II. Prior to issuance of construction pennits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for street lighting at the intersections ofSW 3441h Place and SW 3451h Place with 15th Place SW, in the vicinity of the Parklane Estates neighborhood, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The street lighting shan be designed and located to enhance overan pedestrian and vehicular safety by increasing visibility. Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report EXHIBIT PAGE~__OF 'O File No. 02- IO5406-00-SU / Doc. ID #22419 Page 5 Staff Response: This condition has been met and financially guaranteed. Approved engineering plans included designs for street lighting at the intersections of SW 3441h Place and SW 3451h Place with 151h Place SW. All of the required streetlights were installed in conjunction with plat improvements. 12. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for raised pavement markers along the roadway centerline in the vicinity of SW 3441h Place and 16th Avenue SW, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The raised pavement markers shall be located in areas where there is the potential for vehicular traffic to "drift" across the centerline while traversing curves in the roadway. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Approved engineering plans depicted the required raised pavement markers along the roadway centerline ofSW 3441h Place and 16th Avenue SW consistent with this condition of approval. The raised markers were installed in conjunction with roadway improvements for the plat. 13. Pursuant to the applicant's proposal to pay a fee-in-lieu of providing the required 63,825 square feet of on site open space, and as provided by the FWCC, the most recent assessed values of all parcels comprising the subdivision site or a current appraisal value determined by an MAl certified appraiser must be submitted to the City to determine the required open space fee. Payment of the open space fee shall be required before final plat approval. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The applicant submitted a 2003 King County assessed value statement on January 8, 2003, which listed the 2003 land value of the tax parcels 242103-9047 and 242103-9020 at $405,000.00 (Exhibit H - King County Tax Roll History). Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, open space fees are based on t5 percent of the assessed land value. Based on the referenced 2003 King County Assessment value, $60,750.00 in open space fees were paid to the City on January 27, 2003. 14. Stormwater conveyance, water quality, and infiltration facilities used to control stormwater runoff from the site shall be located in a stormwater tract dedicated to the City at the time of final plat approval, unless located within improved public rights-of-way. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Stormwater conveyance, water quality, and infiltration facilities used to control stormwater runoff from the Belle Meadow plat are located within Tract B, a storm drainage tract, which will be dedicated and conveyed to the City of Federal Way based on note #10 on the final plat map and through a statutory warranty deed that will be recorded with the plat. Tract A of the Keller Preliminary Plat contains stormwater facilities that treat and infiltrate runoff from a portion ofSW 345th Place. Tract A of the preliminary plat of Keller, currently a private system, will be dedicated to the City of Federal Way when the Keller final plat is recorded. A Drainage Release Covenant that allows runoff from the public right-of-way to flow into the existing Keller facility will be recorded along with the final plat of Belle Meadow. 15. The final plat drawing must establish the required arterial street landscape buffer along the 21" Avenue SW frontage in a separate tract to be owned in common and maintained by property owners of the residential subdivision, and prohibiting removal or disturbance of landscaping within the tracts, except as necessary for maintenance or replacement of existing plantings and Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report ~A~~IEJ!T -Þm- FileNo.O2.!O5406.00.SU/"",.LDp:~~~ as approved by the City. The arterial street landscape buffer along the 21 " Avenue SW frontage shall be maintained in a condition consistent with the approved landscape plan pursuant to Condition No. I, above. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The final plat drawing depicts Tract A, a landscape buffer tract located along 21" Avenue SW. The tract has been planted with trees, shrubs, and groundcover as identified in the approved Landscape Plan. Note #9 of page 1 of 4 of the final plat document contains language that identifies ownership and maintenance obligations for Tract A. 16. All streets shall have a minimum pavement section of three inches Class B asphalt over six inches of crushed surfacing to support the traffic loads. Staff Response: This condition has been met and financially guaranteed. Engineering plans approved under file #00-1 0641 O-OO-EN depicted the required street section of three inch Class B asphalt over six inches of crushed surfacing top course, and this pavement was installed. However, settling has occurred on these streets. The applicant submitted an analysis of the situation (Exhibit I - Geotechnical Assessment and Subsurface Exploration of Site Pavement Areas prepared by Earth Consultants Inc., March 14,2003), which recommended that a final lift of asphalt be installed after the majority of the residential construction is complete. In order to mitigate road settlement, the applicant shall grind along all curbs; all castings, storm lids, and monuments shall be adjusted to final grade after the asphalt overlay; shall reconstruct the subgrade in areas as recommended by the Public Works Director; and shall provide a minimum 1-112" Class B asphalt overlay over the entire length and width of each street within the subdivision. This work shall occur after 80 percent build-out of the homes within the Plat of Belle Meadow, or within two years of final plat approval, whichever is less. The applicant has provided separate financial guarantee assuring the completion of this work. 17. Clearing for the construction of the plat improvements, including roads, storm water improvements, and utilities, shall be generally consistent with the clearing limits depicted on the Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan that was prepared by the applicant for the preliminary plat process. The clearing limits referenced above are the approximate clearing limits necessary for road, stormwater improvements, and utility grading, and may be modified with the approval ofthe Community Development Services and Public Works Departments during final engineering review as required to reflect changes in road, stormwater improvements, and utility designs, if any. The remaining clearing beyond these limits necessary for development ofthe residential lots shall not be performed until approved permits are issued for development of the residential lots. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Engineering plans submitted with for this application depicted clearing limits consistent with this condition. Clearing of individual lots will occur in conjunction with construction of homes on each ofthe individual lots. 18. Prior to final plat approval, all required improvements must be completed or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. Design and construction of plat improvements shall conform to the FWCC, 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, and all other applicable codes and regulations. Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report EXHIBIT þ File No. 02-1O5406-00-SU I ""'.lD. #22419 Page 7 ..... Staff Response: This condition has been met. All required improvements depicted on the approved engineering plans have been installed, inspected by the City, and bonding secured per City requirements. Drainage plans and a Technical Information Report were developed in conformance with the 1998 KCSWDM, Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, and all other applicable codes and regulations. V. SEP A CONDITIONS A Mitigated Determination of Non significance (MONS) was issued on July 12,2000, with the following conditions. I. The applicant shall either: a. Construct the following impacted Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) project as required by the Public Works Department, before issuance of Final Plat Approval; or, b. Contribute the project's pro-rata share of the construction cost of the following TIP project before issuance of Final Plat Approval: 18 trips $750,000 $5,925 2,287 trips 0.79% TOTAL $66,175 Staff Response: This condition has been met. The applicant elected to make a pro-rata share contribution in lieu of constructing the improvements. The applicant paid $66,175.00 on January 27, 2003. 2. The applicant shall design and construct all necessary traffic calming devices to mitigate neighborhood traffic impacts in coordination with neighborhood groups, and in compliance with City requirements. These devices may include speed humps, traffic circles, chicanes, curb extensions, signs, pavement markings, or any other device proposed by the applicant and/or neighborhood residents and approved by the Public Works Director. Before issuance of Preliminary Plat Approval, the applicant shall submit plans for the traffic calming devices for the review and approval of the Public Works Traffic Division. The plans shall be prepared and stamped by a licensed civil engineer registered in the State of Washington. Before issuance of Final Plat Approval, the applicant shall construct the traffic calming devices consistent with the approved plans. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The applicant met with neighborhood groups and ultimately provided neighborhood traffic calming measures on plans approved by the City. Speed humps and striping were installed with plat improvements consistent with approved plans. Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report EXHIBlT. PAGE. ~ OF It) FileNo. 02-105406-00-SU I Ooc.1O. "2419 Page 8 VI. DECISIONAL CRITERIA Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-136, if the City Council finds that the following criteria have been met, the City Council may approve the final plat for recording: 1. The final plat is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat. Staff Response: This criterion has been met, as the final plat is representative of the preliminary plat and the conditions of preliminary plat and SEP A mitigation have been met or financially guaranteed. 2. The final plat is in conformity with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls. Staff Response: This criterion has been met. The plat meets the zoning standards for the RS 7.2 zoning district and provides single-family dwelling unit lots that range from 7,294 square feet to 9,442 square feet in size. As provided for in FWCC Section 20-135(b), performance and maintenance bonds are in place for the entire plat including frontage improvements, streets, and all infrastructure. The applicant has opted to make an open space fee in lieu of payment pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155. Based on the assessed land value of $405,000.00, and as provided by the Federal Way Parks Director, the applicant has made a payment to the City of $60,750.00, based on 15 percent of the assessed land value. The plat is within planning Area C of the 1995 Federal Way Parks, Open Space, and Recreation Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has created Tract A, a ten-foot wide landscape area between the subdivision and the 21" Avenue SW arterial, as provided under FWCC Section 20-1 78(a). Tract A, which shall be owned in common by the property owners ofthe entire plat, includes trees and shrubs and groundcover to meet the intent of a Type III buffer. 3. That all conditions of the Hearing Examiner and/or City Council have been satisfied. Staff Response: This criterion has been met as noted in the staff comments above. All plat conditions have been met and or are financially guaranteed to be completed within two years of final plat approval. All life safety improvements have been completed. 4. That the public use and interest shall be served by the establishment of the subdivision and dedication by determining if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, general welfare, open space, drainage ways, streets and roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, and schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. Staff Response: This criterion has been met. The final plat is consistent with applicable zoning and subdivision regulations, and ensures the public health, safety, and welfare is protected. The plat infrastructure has been installed and adequately financially guaranteed as discussed above, including: safe walking routes of travel to schools and school bus stops, open space provided via fee in lieu of payment, drainage systems and water and sewer installed, and street improvements. Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report EXHIBIT DAI".C " nl: File No. 02-IO5406-00-SU I "'" lD. "2419 Page 9 5. 6. That all required improvements have been made and maintenance bonds or other security for such improvements have been submitted and accepted. Staff Response: This criterion has been met. All road, pedestrian pathway, and stonn drainage improvements have been constructed and/or financially guaranteed. In addition, all water and sewer lines have been installed and approved by Lakehaven Utility District as identified in the March 6, 2003, letter of substantial completion from Lakehaven Utility District. That all taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid. Staff Response: Prior to being recorded, the plat is reviewed by the King County Department of Assessments to ensure that all taxes and assessments have been paid. VII. CONCLUSION Based on site visits, review of the final plat maps, construction drawings, and the project file, staff has detennined that the application for final plat approval for Belle Meadow Subdivision meets all platting requirements ofRCW 58.17.110 and Section 20-136 of the Federal Way City Code. Plat infrastructure improvements have been substantially completed and/or financially guaranteed to guarantee that the plat conditions and code requirements will be completed within two years of final plat approval as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135. The project has been developed in confonnance with Resolution 00-325, approving Belle Meadow Preliminary Plat. A recommendation of final plat approval is therefore being forwarded to the City Council for your approval. EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Vicinity Map Belle Meadow Subdivision I Ix17 Reduced Copy of Final Plat Map of Belle Meadow Subdivision 8Yz x 11 Reduced Copy of Approved Preliminary Plat of Belle Meadow Subdivision Resolution 00-325 - October 17, 2000, City of Federal Way Preliminary Plat Approval of Belle Meadow Subdivision. Draft Resolution of Final Plat Approval Applicant Response to Hearing Examiner Conditions Applicant Acceptance of Conditions King County Property Tax Roll History Geotechnical Assessment and Subsurface Exploration Belle Meadow Final Plat Staff Report EXHIBIT FileNo. 02-1O5406-00-SU I"",I;ag':;'~ PAGE-1!._OF._- 10 BELLE MEADOW FINAL PLAT s.w. 320th VICINITY MAP APPROX. SCAI.:E -1" =2 Miles EXHIBIT A~ P PAGE....L.OF -L- ! I' , šW'òU",'1or"- ¡¡¡~"'I;.~~~\""':.- ; . '~1"¡,~.. '\ ,;:,~,~': . ¡. I " o~~ft~¡¡~ .__..,,~-: '--"""'--~ ___","n: ',_""'n~ '_:';""'--: 'n""":, b _"Æ~-: lliffi)": '~~r"', :\~:J:,~:~",:,~~:, ,~ I I 0' ~" :.'0 ~& ~. ." :.'. :... :'" i" , ,- I I L 2: 37 ~ ~ 38 ~ ~ 35 ~; 34 ~ 0 33 P 32 ~; 31 ~; ~ 0 29!g I ui 27 I,¡."";~""""z.""z",~z"",z.""z"",z.:¡gz"""",,, I,,": ,""" I"!¡~",.."".",,,."."."""'.""""""""""""""""""""'"""",o""~"!¡:""',",' ~i,' , ¡ ~" : ",'",,', !Ii 'I ""","0'" ""."',,., "",',,', """',"'" ""","W' ",,",',,', """','W' """,""'" """,'<0', !Ii'~:I' ¡ "000 <~I':""""OO'",oo"'oo"'oo'",oo'"OO"'oo'",oo':<."o: f¡I~: i ! ~ìl;:~! ,:ff~'", 11!!"...o 0.0 ¡",h.!",.",," II I ' ~ ,. '8~ ~ T7 i L. i L. i 5 20 i~ 21 i ~ 22 i ~ 23 i L4 i~ I i ~:! ",,'~.',;:,;".:,':~, \';::/~:i'.z"'.z""'.""z"",z,".z"",z"",z."";"" . "-'- f'," .j~1ïr,~:::-':'::_,::::,:.:_-'~:::::_,'":;,:::_-':'::::"';:::6:":":~~-:;:,,iãj:;: " " 1r=!~Æ:;¡¡---n ~' I .. ",",:«¡;e~oJ2700F.' "',,"'(¡,',~!¡,,:'iJ¡":~/o, """"" .mr- fNI 345TH PI.. DANVILLE STATION DIVISION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 24, 'TWP. 21 N., RGE. 3 E, W.M. City of Federal Way, King County, Washington ;1 'I il .1 ,,' " CEDERA' WAY e"'~à;,~,~;-;ogg~~D'O" ~-Grw.,71' .,. ',"," "" ,~,E"~"::,;,,,,;~~~;~~" ¡¡¡:\r;;~~r¡¡J:~!&:' "I ~I . UNPL"'" " <>WHC 8CAI.E .. .. .."U 'I ,~~'~'" 1<œI>. . ..,-~,.". . ~".., p.".- '"' "' '" "",' .,_..,."".~"-,,,-,,~ . k':.¡~r~="I'¿¡:~';::', \:\'1:"',,", ."""'~, ",~,...",~,.,."ott .~"',.. z 0 " 5 ~ Õ õ . I "ii, B; ~¡~~Z ~¡ S~ \; ~. ',-;;-j " '; ~~ ," ~3.L ". FEDEIW. WAY FILE No. 02-1OS406-00-BU SHEET 4 OF 4 )1i!m G'»< m% f~ ~tU f DANVILLE STATION DIVISION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 24, TWP. 21 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. City of Federal. Way, King County, Washington /OOä~C:¡iti',.-'""""'~ '. :' ' \ :~ , '\"~ ..i'!\ , N ' BCA 00-'040<7 I~ '~"~:~'\;\fi:~~T¡Õ ",00 \~~::~;;~~::i '"::~~~~Y.;~:~.~~O:,~i::~~~:~:'.:.,~-e~~ 'r276~ - ", ,,'" , il O'~ "~,, ~:::1,q' ,f lt~ :",~\'\~01'?'::'" ",ø:.:~ ~34411i~ ' ' I I !H" ", ':::::':,'.;' I, f' ,OF~\~,;;;;;. "--""Ln',nmo.."",n\nnn--mLnniíj'¡,¡c",.,, ': I,:'., "',00" '" ",.":.,,,' "',"~,"~'"!~i""I" " '0' -<"" ¡¡¡,r-íFi1'¡¡'t¡¡:¡::¡ --i-. I 1¡~1': ~ .~'i~ r~¡".1 ~'~ .~ ~8 " :.ø.." I. ,I TRACT'A" 'I'" "~",,. ,"I ., 8' 0 ,. 2 ~. 1 ,. TRACT 8 '.' ~",""""",,," "",'" '!'I"¡¡"""'!D"'~"""z....",~...:;1:',I'"':;!I'i". ',',ï ..1!¡"1'~":,~~i~" "';':";:'~I~';""""""""""""""" i"II; ¡I,~ih~, . ]8~¡~'~~I"","""""',"""""',...n ,i~"~ '"...~,t,n. """ ""~"I""" ",00' "",' ",."."."",. "'"51 ¡I~æ,,~'"' "~",,. ,"üæ'il ,",00 "'" ",,' "'" "".. ",,' ",wi ~"I ¡,~, , ;g. ..."",~." ¡,¡al"¡ , jill"~ ~I'¡I~ "'" ],~!I ,~,~, '.~." ~¡ ,. ,'I z~ 7 ,~¡! ,i" ~. ~" ~. ". ~~ ~. :~ ,I' ~I ¡ili ~ ::~;;:~, ~~"l :L~~j~..\~, ¡~..\1,~"..~,¡",,\'!.~o,~~",,\~.i: 1'1 'II.,!~ ,."',00' "" """~,,..,.z',m",'u,,"'."""""""""",."""""",""'~,"'~" ,! . i i¡ !i!~ . !,r;:~:~~~"'r~ c~, ..~o~!!~:; in;;õ.'-õ' "'.nn;.-; ,'m".--- on,¡-õ"'" i"Y;¡Cn m~~:" '': , " . ,-,'" " / ~... """...,"~"~, I l c. ',""""'" -'õ~~...-v,,""'E1275'7.' '~~'~"'."'."",- . I"";,",': .!,.::.Jti¡,f~~\~;o . \.'~':';:~:::;::'i'~;~'~š~'~¡[- r-- UNPLATTOD " I; I' I" UNPC,,"D <>WHO SCALe --..1 'U 'i //---", '/'."'",'P"~,,\ I 'N; ;,., } \ L- rl~;"(!",~~~~\wM~r~'I,;..,,~ "": - _-::~'} Œ. ,;,::"~)" LEGEND . . .~g,~I.':.~::~¡';::,:..::i.t'¡';"::¡; . .1~M~¡~:':'o'Il...:'\\:\\".'~,., ,."" ~'~~m ~ p~~,œr... ~,~"",~~,.",~"'Œ' SEE SHEETS 1 AND 2 OF 4 FOR AOOITIONAL NOTES DAI.E(;~~~ "". .".":~'~\~I,~~;~;g¡Or,~'!gg~,,,. FEDERAL WAY FILE No. 02-1O54O6-OO-SU SHEET 3 OF 4 ~~~ ~m C»< m::l: IUJ~ rr -~¡j~ (24¡-."""", -.;¡;-- - - - - - - - - - - - -""""'~.-"""'-- - - - - - - - - - ~,;-,:;;;:24. §" r ::~ :""~'~'~!"" I r'~':" ---- -- - -- --- -- - T -- -- - --- -- - -- - - - - ":'-, , I ~ TRACT 'A' 1 , I :;;. 4 PL I 28 1 : I I ,~~ I . I I ," i 5 it 3 2 1 TRACra' it it 27 ~ I :Iit~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 28 ~ : I.'~B i ~ Ii ; ~I I~;'¡¡§ 910.,2131415: 25§:1 I~¡þ~' 8 I ,; I I"~. :;;.' NI19'27 E ..78' ¡ I 4 -----------~~~~~~~~~~-------------_J ;~ì : ¡ ,~,¡ itl [I :'r-"/L'.'~-". ~, ;,: ,:.is':;J^~ NE ~, ", . . "OSELL' it-2. Iii T -~~~~-..;;;~":~'--- ¡ , Ii-. ',~ ~ec~ '00 1 ¡: :' "-",:::~ I !. ~i::ro.~~:::.,J - -- --- - -- -."..,~"',-=,,- - - -- -- - -- - - - ¡~~~;i~ DANVILLE STATION DIVISION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 24, TWP. 21 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. City of Federal Way, King County, Washington ~ II ¡: II , , I ae<>",""..""""e,w" ~';::~.~~'M' ".e;::~..~~,"~~' .... <>' ........,. .. '" "'... ., ._"." .oo.~ "' ,., ,,~.."~.m'..' ..",.,... .,,_e.1 ,-~",,="M' OM",""""." ~, , ,~~m"O~"M.O'H'" , e..",.œ.."",,,~eM""~."~,.' "~O'~'M~~~"M~" """. "'woo_." '",. MO.""""""M"""" I.,_,_"'.",~'~'M"......"'~"'OO' MO ..,~ '. W. "~'".,, , ""........._.m "';>'-" . "OO..,"'".......OO'..~"' ",."oo,œ",- , "~"'~""O""M",""""""~ ' rb";.~;~,¡~O~:~\\"'\'¡""""""""". . M"M,~,~"",.."..,m""...' SEE SHEET 1 OF 4 FOR ADDmoNAL NOTES D~;~:!,~':9"-~ "". ,"~;~'j:~,,~;'.~:góo1,~!¡¡¡~m. FEDEIjAL WAY FiLE No: D2-1D54O6-{)O-SU SHEET 2 OF 4 ~ 'NOOe~ ~ ~;;\I_1(' .._" ~m 10»< m::C I~~ ~œ DANVILLE STATION DIVISION No. I A PORTION OF NE 1/4, SE 1/4, SEC. 24, TWP. 21 N., RGE. 3 E., W.M. City of Federal Way, King County, Washington """""" ~~':~::.,.;;.=~,:~ ,::'~ ~~-- . ,,- ..." 0"" """ ...","".. ,", ~."., "".. ~ *""". ,,~.. ~." "., :::~':;,':I~ '.'::~I;:~~~r\:;::~;J¡O¡:::~""" ~~.:'\\Z':: .~..::.:r" .<!":',~".'~I;"~'::!,~;',:'~":'~".~..~"." ",,- -. "'~'"' ~"." 00"" """""" .._,... ".".~..,,~.""~'"' .. .,.~. w..""""~"'~...... "" ~~""".... "... . "". ..". " "~ '~". .._,.... ..,,~ ~".~ ..~"m.,,~~~." ,,~~,~... ~..," ~ """ """""~ "."._""~.""~'"' ~"~.",oo. "'""'00. ...." .... - ~""."'"~-""""~".. ."", ~~Ë.1;t.:;~ i1~~:~~~ '~~,"1'~#"_----- :/'~:t,¡"t ¡1::~,:::~.",,", ¡C7i::- ;r;.;¡;;:; f ~ (40/U- ""7l) 'C<NO~ ~ "'~""'~'""'" ,~""~_.,"-- "'"""~"',",","M""""'O",""'""~"----"!!"'-'-""."'--- êf~i~~~:~\l'€'t' '" 0". ... ';;~~i:~~E;'~1f:I' { '\ ""'l~¿~,"",-,-__-- , I ",.,ru,,"1'."; .~. (;},) "...., "'" M""_-."~'!:!- ...""..,"'"",. \$t~ """O'~"""""-~"-"~-- ~~::::,"';,,~;~:: '" .", '^"~"""' """'" ~" _",-,~,"--jLJMý.!!.i ~:~':d:~~::~,:"~,":, o;"~'-'~"':::~:,;;l'i¡~'", '::'":.'::':~:_~~:";:":;' ~~::g.::~.;o""""""o.,","..."".~~'","'..,"",o".",""~"'" ,,~,,-----òkllQ2------- :::"';:':.'":':",',\,,, .t~""'{WI')- "' .._~~;¡:;::~~ -.,.""""""'......,........,,~,..,,"~ tä1~2i!*.1~1:ïf~1':';¡\~::)'.i~'DJ!?F.. ~';'~~i&:::: O¡¡¡ii~ :£il¡ ;,:., ~:?:; ;~J¡~~:~~::¡¡;¡¡-';~~U:1¡~ :::~~:;iii.~i,: """""O"'C~...""","M"< ""'^""----------- """"""mn""""",----- FEDERAl. WAY FILE No. 02-1O54O6-OO-StJ StEET 1 OF 4 ~m ø)( m% r~ ~U1 ~~ ""'.. EEQŒ' ."' """"'"' " CO""""" """ 0°"'"' a_.~,~"",~._..",--~_.,,-- -,-" ~-" .~-., ~:~'::..";~';;:-;";~."" ~¡¡¡¡;¡---- ~;:::;~::':":':';';:~~'~ ,:;:;~~- . "-- ..,-"..,~--- ..,~"'~~ ~,~_. '"'~~. -~" ,':;.;~:;,' ::~:.:,;,..z.':';'~?~, c~;~:;.:~:; ".., .., """"M" '""'"' ,~.~'"~ !!i:iÏ'~~.¡;;.;r¡:':k~g";:,,,::.' ,'i:,~,~ ::;~t.'.:'m',¡:~~:: ¡¡ ::¡ :::,,~,:g: "',-"",---_.,,-- ;W¡¡¡¡;.'"'~"'-"""-- ""'ii------- ~'i!:;.~¡¡":¡¡ rii.~~';.'!- ~;rm'.~, :,:~w::~.~,w",\1:"1"~ :::.:~~,,:; ~ ~," , ,".._,," ..-., ""..~'". ~.o". ."",,"" """"..""", MoN"",' " * -"~ ~.~ -," ... ~"'. "" ,~, ."""" "~ '"'~, " ..~""". "" "~. ..~, M W"", ~. " 'mq ".. "~,, ". .000 ~. ~."_.. W~. ~". "'-""'~"""'."~""-"~."-"'-'"'._.~..~' i.. !':::\'\~,";~':¡"";.':1\ :'.=:0;: '.~~:;..:¡¡::\,:.:\o¡:,¡g..:æ ßO-UO-H> m~,,_,", > :u o~.~, ';~:.I~ =,.:":,1/':; . .,. ...."~ "'" ~. '"'" ~ ,,~'" .- ~ ¡~.¡¡,~,;I¡ * ".. ~. ,~,-, ,.".. " ,,"." " '"" ..-. """ ..",... ~"." :..¡~';:1'"~:::; ~~:~=~::'.E:.:'~.'::,~~J=" 0" . .~.. .., .~,,~, ~ ~".'::::o%.\' ~ ."..... ~>~, "'~""'",... ...~..,.,.. "."."",..., ~".' , wo,"" * "" ~,~""OO," '~Œ"",.'~"""" ."","""'"'" ooo"o"~m.. ~'"~ ,,~~,.. ~,~. "..~ """-' .,,_. ~" .~""' """.. ~.,,=,.., :,. ,.',';;.',,::;n'.;¡',":',~~ '::liii!,;:~~: ~:;:~',:,'~r.::'o~~':':¡"'~~'f~::~':i1 ?':':::', :i:':¡r~'ii"::::; ~.:::t :::,;,:::::r~.~,~~~:; ;:'~:";':~;;::':;'::"~,,~,<;::.~, ':~'~, ,:~~;~ =. ".". .W. " ."", .~".. '" '00'" " '" "" ~ "... "'. '" :::., """"""CA'S"""""Á"" ~ =~~~~,¡::¡~~t¡¡:,¡.æJri¡ ~~:J£,r;ï5i\;:f~'~¡¡¡;f~~~~, ~,::::.':""...t.::"\""~'-" ~.. -~..,.'" .~, ,~,~ .. "" "-~'" ., """"""'"013'. MoaV3V11 31138 0" 'ÁNYd"OO aNY' Á3-ny^ ÁddYH , ~ , :1 !¡ í ~ ,¡. . ¡ !d;!~- .,!¡¡'!ì!:i'~l' ! !! ¡. - ,I, ,1;¡"; ¡i ¡¡i ¡ ", "'". , ! j ,!i II;' :m ~ ;' ¡ ! " > < , , ! ¡ II J! I :!!;: 1",1:, qi'i , ¡ ¡,d,li ,!< H ¡ 0 ¡ ""! ~!í: ¡' ¡ ! :,,; ¡ hn,~¡ .., " !p~n r , ¡~¡I; II L ,I¡ii!e", ill II H ¡I! jï h iI ~;¡ I: I \$1.( .--..,..t--~I: '. "i~ , '70~, '" !' . 'I ø ,:;:, , ,'>@ ,. 'i; ,~l@: :~:~ ,~~r@<3'~~~C @ ~ ! '.i;f::.-=j1i~r~~~~~~:~~:'r;L:':-1: ~': !;¡:~ ,. , (I ':@j!'Or;Ø'~ØirOf'¡~"Ø,:.:!Øi",.!r.¡ ¡[~ '~'n_..c.....::_: ¡""~ ,.'¡'j ,j' ':' 1'7')'\ 1 , , ~~ .',:.'~ 'i"'",,!,i,,/"';'),: ",)ih,' ~~ .' ! [; ¡[ -- ='-J ~j.,;L ,I 'i ,I; ~~. ;¡... I:. ,I, !I' '~~'T--'iì~'-'+--11:',)i /, ~~ ~'., ,,! Ii;!; ,1',t--l:,-l,'li"I,!~¡';1, :" (lj!"I,Fh ~i5 '.LS~!"3""""~:" :'II'-'-!II~-ÎJI ,-"II ~~ --I,,'I;! ~'lt'--'I:Jn:l:ii; I.\,\~ w¡:j ",I": il,I..,- "'", '"uMi,,: ':1" , I, i' ~I¡I .If Ii;: '1'1 ,\",lnl)L:"~c_......;i). ~i ~ I:, ~~¡:!¡I:' If ' f, =-}, 'Oii,jili,::'¡~1Irc-':-~"\ '. ~¡,~ ::,Jfl~'~' ,1~~,~S~^~,\"!':':~=R ¡ ~,"-,,'-f.)~, .1'j'r'r"~i:,:~I'!i,. Ii i:I"'l"I,~.>,"',",~t .I11!1' J~I' ¡,¡~,' !I¡,:íl, ! !I".:'Y'.;, ,~,~-"",.',',','~' ":,'I',~,l,l.,'" ¡-.,l,'I, i "..,,:-),,;,,:~,.,~,J,Ht ':ni:!"', ' ~" .'"..d..LI:¡c L'd"I' -,!,- '::111111¡1 ~'~",-I.III" ~')III!I ¡ ": " !.' I i'>u 'I "', I " 1l'i'¡.! ll! r:--¡iil !,_,..I-~""-'m:-:i: if'" I ..1,.-: "'~"'", I I :7; 1l !,!" I: "L ,.~ \, II . , ,/' , ~I'I! f-'" ",'.::¡;. -lII .1.' ,,-=Ab"IJ)l --"'---;~;'~~r":-1;~j '~.~j ,¡ "}i;"¡XT~-'f~--; I~I \""!!~ "<-:>;"dl~ ,i.@ i 'uu~m :~:I Ø%!=¡ ~~:j'¡~~'~ . :. :~ 7,~! ~:!~ , ;: II Ii Iii J - Ii ",I 'I ¡ ! III ¡I Ii ¡¡III!' J !~!dl ì 'I II I !,III.I ! I, " "II" H' I,!!!,'!':! j"I"! f¡¡IJI.i;! I;! U;¡! i!! ! .1 L I. J, !. I,d I ! I I j, ! I J, ! ¡!'!¡!'f."¡!'!I,q¡!' ~¡~~¡j I:¡¡¡¡ ¡', 1,1 J'.Î ,II II .¡ I II ~¡' ,1'1" " " I' ¡I' IIi i¡¡iI¡¡¡~¡~¡ 1i;¡G;¡~¡i Ii .. ¡,I ,I,i ,i ,11,1 "¡'" J¡' ''~" I' j¡, ~mti¡¡mi!¡¡Mli¡¡ I ! ,I¡.I',¡ ¡,I ¡,j ",I !,¡ :,1 I'~¡' !", ." t" ¡"¡,,.It j!!!1 .!I!¡!l~!lI;!I!~!l !!!I/!! J¡¡¡ IIJI¡i!!f¡¡ m¡¡¡¡ Ii! II RESOLUTION NO. 00-325 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BELLE MEADOW, FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. 0O-100318-00-SU. WHEREAS, the 'applicant Dick Schroeder, applied to the City of Federal Way for preliminary plat approval to subdivide certain real property known as Belle Meadow, consisting of 9.77 acres, into thirty-seven (37) single family residential lots located on the east side of the 34500 block of 21st Avenue SW; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2000, a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued for the proposal by the Director of Federal Wày's Department of Community Development Services pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW 43.21C, and no appeals of the MDNS were filed; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on August 29, 2000, concerning the preliminary plat of Belle Meadow; and WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing, on September 12, 2000, the Federal Way Hearing Examiner issued a written Report and Recommendation containing fmdings, conclusions and recommending approval of the preliminary plat of Belle Meadow, subject to conditions set forth therein; and " I Res. #OO-32;;Page I EXHIB,IT ~ PAGE_OF ---ß.. WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has jurisdiction and authority pursuant to Section 20-127 of the Federal Way City Code to approve, deny or modifY a preliminary plat and/or its conditions; and WHEREAS, on October 17,2000, the City Council considered the written record and the Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and all other applicable City Codes; NOW THEREFQRE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. AdoPtion of Findings of Fact and Conclusions. 1. The findings offact and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference, are hereby adopted as the [IDdings and conclusions of the Federal Way City Council. Any finding deemed to be a conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding shall be treated as such. 2. Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report and Hearing Examiner's recommendation, and conditions of approval as established therein, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, potable water supplies, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, play grounds, and schools and school grounds and all other relevant facts, as are required by City Code and state law, and provides for sidewalks and other plarming features to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. 3. The public use and interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval granted \ herein. Res. f¡lJO-32~Page 2 EXHIBIT b PAGE~OF .ßL Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the recommendation of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner and findings and conclusions contained therein as adopted by the City Council immediately above, the preliminary plat of Belle Meadow, Federal Way File No. 00- 100318-00-SU, is hereby approved, subject to conditions as contained in the Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner dated September 12,2000 (Exhibit A). Section 3. Conditions of Approval Integral. The conditions of approval of the preliminary plat are all integral to each oth<?r with respect to the City' Council finding that the public use and interest will be served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval granted in this resolution shall be deemed void, and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or conditions and conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare and other factors as required by RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules and regulations, and forward such recommendation to the City Council for further action. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or . unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date \ of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Res. # 00- 31,Page 3 EXHIBIT ~ PAGE~OF~ Section 6. Effective Date. This reso1utiotJ. shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CrTY COUNcrL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS -.!L DAY OF October ,2000. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY . ~~flh/ / ~~~~ 57~~ CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: yj?;t; C. ~ INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY, ROBERT S. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 10/09/00 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:1O/17/00 RESOLUTION NO. 00-325 " , Res. 1Io0-32sPage4 EXHIBIT b PAGE~OF I!Þ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BELLE MEADOW PROCESS IV I. . SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to allow a 37 lot single family residential subdivision as provided for under Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20, "Subdivisions., and requiring approval pursuant to FWCC Section 20-110. II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Hearing Date: Decision Date: August 29, 2000 September 12, 2000 At the hearing the following presented testimony and evidence: 1. Tim McHarg, City Consultant, Madrona Planning and Development Services 2. Stuart Scheuerman, ESM Consulting Engineers, 720 South 348th St., Federal Mlay, WA 98003 3. Don Bowditch, 2019 SW 347th Place, Federal Way, WA 98023 4. Chris Kraft, 2022 SW 347th Place, Federal Way, WA 98023 5. Barbara Collins, 34707 18th Ave. SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 6. Teny Gibson, Traffic Engineer for Applicant, Gibson Traffic Consultants, P.O. Box 330, Olalla, WA 98359 7. Richard Perez, City Traffic Engineer EXHIBIT --.D PAGE~OF ,~ \ 1 Ftll EXHIBIT // At the hearing the following exhibits were admitted as part of the official record of these proceedings: 1. Staff Report with all attachments 2. Letter from Tomich 3. Petition from Don Bowditch III. FINDINGS 1. The Hearing Examiner heard testimony, admitted documentary evidence into" the record, and took this matter under advisement. 2. The Community Development Staff Report sets forth general findings, applicable policies and provisions in this matter and is hereby marked as Exhibit "1" and incorporated in its entirety by this reference. 3. All appropriate notices were delivered in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). 4. The applicant has a possessory ownership interest in a rectangular, 9.77 acre parcel of property abutting the east side of 21st Ave. SW between SW 344111 St. and SW 346111 St. The east property line abuts lots within the Parklane Estates Division II subdivision. The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to allow subdivision of the site into 37 single family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 7,205 square feet. 5. The preliminary plat map shows a looped road system providing internal access to all 10tSR" External access will be provided by 18111 Ave. SW which the applicant will construct north from the north property line to SW 344111 St. (presently under construction) which will provide access to a State park-n-ride lot to the north. The applicant will also extend 18111 Ave. to the south to 346111 Place. The applicant will also construct the north portion of SW 345111 Place along the south property line and will connect it to SW 345111 Place in the Parklane Estates Division II subdivision. The Keller preliminary plat will construct the south portion of SW 345111 Place. A 25,486 square foot Tract B located in the northcentral portion of the site is designated for a storm water detention facility. A ten foot wide landscape buffer will be installed on 21st Ave. SW across the plat frontage. 6. The applicant filed a completed application for preliminary plat approval on February 18,2000, and in accordance with RCW 5?:17.033 is subject to the comprehensive plan, zoning regulations, and land use or~inances in effect on said date. 2 EXHIBIT D PAGE~0FJ:2: 8. 9, 10. 11. 12. 7. The storm drainage facilities must comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual as well as applicable recommendations of the Executive Proposed Basin Plan for Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound, Such standards require surface water detention, biofiltration, and oil/water separation. The storm drainage system proposes to collect storm water runoff and convey it through a pipe system to a water quality biofiltration swale. The water will flow through the swale to an engineered pond where it will infiltrate into the ground. The rolling topography of the site has average slopes of less than 7%. The site slopes downward from the east and west portions to the center, the proposed location for the detention pond. Vegetation includes fir, cedar, and fruit trees along with shrubs and grass. Forty-nine trees meet the definition of "significant" as set forth in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). The applicant must remove nine significant trees to construct the required infrastructure and utilities. While small birds and animals likely inhabit the site, none are threatened or endangered species. Replacement of significant trees as well as provision of buffer open space and the infiltration pond will mitigate the impacts of development on wildlife habitat. No sensitive areas such as landslide areas, erosion areas, wetlands, streams, or floodplains are located on the site, The site is located within the Single Family-High Density designation of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and the Single Family 'Residential (RS-7.2) zone classification of the FWCC. Both the comprehensive plan and RS-7.2 classification authorize single family residential homes on minimum 7,200 square foot lot sizes. All abutting properties are also located in the RS-7.2 classification and development consists of homes on minimum 7,200 square foot lot sizes with the exception of the State park and ride facility currently under construction to the north of the site. The site is'presently improved with single family residences and associated structures, all of which will be removed prior to development. The street improvements detailed on pages 8-10 of the staff report are complex due to development of the plat in conjunction with the Keller preliminary plat abutting the south property line. Issues have also arisen because development of the two plats will allow extension of SW 345'" Place from its present terminus in the Parklane Estates Division 1/ subdivision to 21st Ave. SW, and the extension of 18'" Ave. SW from its current terminus at the north property line of the Rosella Lane subdivision to SW344'" Street and SW 345'" Place. The preliminary plat map shows that the applicant will construct half street improvements on SW 344'" Place locate9 adjacent to the north property line. The applicant will provide a 30 foot wide right-of-way; 20 feet of pavement; vertical curb, gutter, and streetlights; a five foot sidewalk; and a four foot landscape strip with 3 EXHIBIT ~ PAGE~OF --L.2.- 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. trees. Internal plat roads separated from the east and west property lines by one tier of lots extend south from SW 344"' Place to SW 345"' Place. The applicant will also construct 18"' Ave. SW from SW 344"' St. to the south property line. Said road bisects the plat and will continue south through the Keller plat to SW 346"' Place and the Rosella Lane plat. The applicant will construct half street improvements on SW 345"' Place to emergency vehicle access standards. Upon completion of the Keller and Belle Meadow plats, SW 345"' Place will be extended from its present terminus at the east property line of Parklane Estates Division II to the west property line of a parcel not part of the plat separating the northwest portion of the Keller plat from 21st Ave. SW. The applicant and Keller will construct a temporary cul-de-sac at said location. The Keller plat will then extend SW 346"' Place to 21st Ave. SW, but at such time as SW 345"' Place is extended to 21st Ave. SW, the Keller plat will close the 346"' Place access and construct a permanent cul-de-sac. The applicant will construct sidewalks along all lot frontages within the subdivision and landscaping along 21st Ave. SW., and will screen the infiltration pond. Furthermore, based upon a neighborhood meeting the applicant will install traffic calming mitigation on SW 345"' Place and other neighborhood traffic safety improvements to include a raised pedestrian crosswalk and raised pavement markers. Children residing in the plat will attend Sherwood Forest Elementary, lIIahaee Junior High School, and Federal Way High School. The Federal Way School District states that elementary students will walk to Sherwood Forest because the subdivision is within a one mile radius. The district has approved an access route for students from the proposed subdivision to the school utilizing existing sidewalks, and will provide bus transportation for both junior high and senior high students. Existing sidewalks provide appropriate access to school bus stops for such students. The applicant must comply with the City School Impact Fee Ordinance at the time of building permit application. Section 20-155(b) FWCC requires the applicant to set aside 15% of the gross plat land area as open space or in the alternative pay a fee in lieu of such dedication for the support and maintenance of City parks within the park comprehensive plan planning area in which the subdivision is located. The City parks director has approved the applicant's fee in lieu of proposal. The Lakehaven Utility District will provide both domestic water and fire flow to the site and will also provide sanitary sewer service to each lot. Prior to obtaining approval of a preliminary plat the applicant must establish that the request satisfies the decision criteria set f&rth in Section 20-126(c) FWCC. Findings on each criteria are hereby made as follows: 4 EXHlqJJ- D PAGE~OF -EL ) E. A. The proposed preliminary plat complies with the 1995 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan which designates the site and surrounding area as Single Family - High Density. The proposed density and lot sizes comply with the said designation. B. A preliminary plat will comply with FWCC Chapter 18, Environmental Policy; Chapter 20, Subdivisions; and Chapter 22, Zoning. The plat will also comply with all other applicable codes and regulations as conditioned hereinafter. C. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. D. The plat complies with the design criteria set forth in Section 20-2 FWCC. The plat makes an effective use of the land; provides water, sewage, drainage, and recreational areas; promotes safe and convenient travel on streets; provides proper ingress and egress; and provides for the housing needs of the community. The subdivision complies with development standards set forth in Sections 20-151 through 20-157, and Sections 20-158 through 20-187 FWCC. IV. CONCLUSIONS From the foregoing findings the Hearing Examiner makes the following conclusions: 4. 1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction to consider and make recommendations to the Federal Way City Council on the issues presented by this request. 2. - The proposed preliminary plat of Belle Meadow complies with the Single Family - High Density designation of the 1995 Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and satisfies all technical criteria of the RS-7.2 zone classification of the FWCC. 3. The proposed preliminary plat makes appropriate provision for the public health, safety, and general welfare for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary waste, fire protection, parks, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and safe walking conditions. The proposed preliminary plat will serve the public use and interest by providing an attractive location for a single family residential subdivision convenient to schools, parks, and shopping opportunities, and therefore should be approved subject to the following conditions: , 5 EXHIBIT P PAGE~~ 1. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a landscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following elements: a. Required ten foot Type III arterial street landscape buffer along the 21st Avenue SW frontage; Open space area landscaping; Street trees in planter strips inside plat boundaries along the 21st Avenl!e SWfrontage; Significant tree replacement plan; and Visual screening of the stormwater infiltration tract from the right-of- way with landscaping and/or fencing. b. c. d. e. 2. Prior to final plat approval, the existing structure on Lots 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 37 must be removed or relocated to confonn to building setbacks requirements as established by the FWCC, or lot lines must be adjusted accordingly. 3. Final plat approval of the Belle Meadow subdivision shall occur simultaneously with, or subsequent to, final plat approval of the adjacent Keller subdivision in order to extend and provide access from SW 345111 Place in the configuration indicated on the preliminary plat drawing. Alternatively, prior to issuance of construction permits, the preliminary plat drawing shall be revised and submitted to the City for approval to indicate a revised access configuration from SW 345th Place to the Belle Meadow subdivision that meets all applicable City and Fire Department requirements. 4. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall revise the plat to redesign the southwest corner of SIN 345th Place and 20th Avenue SW to ¥construct a half-street improvement, including a minimum of 20 feet of pavement, curb, gutter, streetlights, a four foot planter strip with street trees, and a five foot sidewalk along the entire Lot 9 frontage. 5. Prior to issuance of construction pennits, the applicant shall revise the plat to remove the radius of the west right-of-way line of 20th Avenue SWalong the proposed Lot 8 frontage. The west right-of-way line of 20th Avenue SW along the proposed Lot 8 frontage shall be redesigned to be perpendicular to the southern property line of the site and parallel to the 21st Avenue SW right-of-way. 6. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall revise the plat to correctly label 20th Avenue SWand 16th Avenue SW, which are not currently shown. \ 6 EXHIBIT ~ PAGE~OF ..L2- 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. The applicant shall acquire, or arrange for dedication in a form acceptable to the City, sufficient off-site right-of-way as indicated on the Preliminary Plat between the northern property line of the site and the SW 344th Street right- of-way for the extension of 18th Avenue SW. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of ownership, or arrangements for dedication in a fonn acceptable to the City, of the required 18th Avenue SW off-site right-of-way for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. Prior to final plat approval, the section of SW 344th from 21$t Avenue SWto 18th Avenue SW, including the full intersection of SW 344th Street and 18th Avenue SW, shall be constructed, approved, and dedicated to the City. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for two speed humps, one on SW 344th Place and one on SW 345th Place, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The speed humps shall be designed and located to discourage potential cut-through traffic into adjoining neighborhoods. Prior to issuance of construction pennits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for a raised pedestrian crosswalk at the regional BPA trail crossing on SW 344th Place, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for street lighting at the intersections of SW 344th Place and SW 345th Place with 15th Place SW, in the vicinity of the Park Lane Neighborhood, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The ¡Street lighting shall be designed and located to enhance overall pedestrian and vehicular safety by increasing visibility. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for raised pavement markers along the roadway centerline in the vicinity of SW344th Place and 16th Avenue SW, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The raised pavement markers shall be located in the areas where there is the potential for vehicular traffic to "drift" across the centerline while traversing curves in the roadway. Pursuant to the applicant's proposal to pay a fee-in-lieu of providing the required 63,825 square feet of on ¡¡ite open space, and as provided by the FWCC, the most recent assesse\:t values of all parcels comprising the subdivision site or a current appraisal value determined by an MAl certified 7 EXHIBIT b PAGE--'LOF ,~ 17. 18. appraiser must be submitted to the City to determine the required open space fee. Payment of the open space fee shall be required before final plat approval. 14. Stormwater conveyance, water quality, and infiltration facilities used to control stormwater runoff from the site shall be located in a stonnwater tract dedicated to the City at the time of final plat approval, unless located within improved pubic rights-of-way. 15. The final plat drawing must establish the required arterial street landscape buffer along the 21" Avenue SW frontage in a separate tract to be owned in common and maintained by property owners of the residential subdivision, and prohibiting .removal or disturbance of landscaping within the tracts, except as necessary for maintenance or replacement of existing plantings and as approved by the City. The arterial street landscape buffer along the 21 5t Avenue SW frontage shall be maintained in a condition consistent with the approved landscape plan pursuant to Condition No.1, above. 16. All streets shall have a minimum pavement sections of three inches Class B asphalt over six inches of crushed surfacing to support the traffic loads. Clearing for the construction of the plat improvements, including roads, stonnwater improvements, and utilities, shall be generally consistent with the clearing limits depicted on the Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan that was prepared by the applicant for the preliminary plat process. The clearing limits referenced above are the approximate clearing limits necessary for road, stormwater, improvements, and utility grading, and may be modified with the approval of the Community Development Services and Public Works Departments during final engineering review as required to reflect changes in road, stormwater improvements, and utility designs, if any. The remaining clearing beyond these limits necessary for development of the residential lots shall not be performed until approved permits are issued for development of the residential lots. . Prior to final plat approval, all required improvements must be completed or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. Design and construction of plat improvements shall conform to the FWCC, 1998 KCSWDM, Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, and all other applicable codes and regulations. 8 b '3 EXHIBIT PAGE~OF RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby recommended to the Federal Way City Council that the preliminary plat of Belle Meadow be approved subject to the conditions contained in the conclusions above. DATED THIS 11 /2 DAY OF September, 2000. '\'-- TRANSMITTED THIS ~ DAY OF September, 2000, to the following: APPLICANT: Dick Schroeder Happy Valley Land Company P.O. Box 1324 Issaquah, WA 98027 AGENT/ENGINEER: ESM Consulting Engineers Stuart L. Scheuerman 720 South 348'" Street Federal Way, WA 98003 OWNER: Dick Schroeder Happy Valley Land Company P.O. Box 1324 Issaquah, WA 98027 - Chris Kraft Don Bowditch Terry Gibson 2022 SW 347'" Place 2019 SW 347'" Place P.O. Box 330 , Federal Way, WA 98023 Federal Way, WA 98023 Olalla, WA 98359 City of Federal Way c/o Chris Green 33530 1 sl Way S. Federal Way, WA 98003 \' 9 EXHIBIT /) PAGE ~0F3 RESOLUTION NO.- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF BELLE MEADOW, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, FILE NO. 02- 1O5406-00-SU WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 00-1003 I8-00-SU, was approved subject to conditions on October 17,2000, by Federal Way Resolution No. 00-325; and WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfied all of the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 00-325 and in the September 12, 2000, Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted the application for final plat for Belle Meadow within the required time of receiving approval for the above-referenced preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services and Public Works Department staff have reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Federal Way Hearing Examiner, and their analysis and conclusions are set forth in the April 29, 2003, Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council Land Userrransportation Committee considered the application for the Belle Meadow final plat at its May 5, 2003, meeting and recommended approval by the full City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Staff Report and the application for final plat for Belle Meadow during the Council's May 20, 2003, meeting; Now THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. I. The final plat for Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 02-1O5406-00-S0, is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat and is in conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was deemed complete. Res. # _Page I EXH I B IT ~Final Plat of Belle Meadow I Doc ID # 22778 PAGE-L-OF !» 2. Based on inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report which are adopted herein by reference and on the City Council's review of the application for final plat, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provision for public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, play grounds, and schools and school grounds as are required by City Code, or are necessary and appropriate, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. 3. The public use and interest will be served by the final plat approval granted herein. 4. All conditions listed in the Federal Way Resolution No. 00-325 and the conditions listed in the September 12,2000, Recommendation of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner, have been satisfied, and/or satisfaction of the conditions have been sufficiently guaranteed by the applicant as allowed by Federal Way City Code Section 20-135. 5. All required improvements have been made and/or sufficient bond, cash deposit, or assignment of funds have been accepted as guaranty for completion and maintenance of all required plat improvements, as identified in the April 29, 2003, Staff Report. 6. All taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid or will be paid, prior to recording the final plat. Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the Findings and Conclusions contained in Section I above, the final plat of Belle Meadow, City of Federal Way File No. 02-105406-00-SU, is approved subject to satisfaction of compliance with plat conditions and conditions required by the Public Works Director as identified in the Staff Report and as required by applicable codes and policies. Section 3. Recording. The approved and signed final plat, together with all legal instruments pertaining thereto as required pursuant to all applicable codes, shall be recorded by the applicant in the King County Department of Records. The applicant shall pay all recording fees. Res. # _Page 2 EXHIBIT tJ Þ PAGE~OF 3 Final Plat of Belle Meadow I Doc ID # 22778 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invaliditY or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase ofthis resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authoritY and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way CitY Council. RESOLVED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this- day of ,2003. CitY of Federal Way Mayor, Jeanne Burbidge Attest: CitY Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC Approved as to Form: CitY Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERIC PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION No: Res. # _Page 3 EXHIBIT ~ PAGE ") OF ~ Final Plat of Belle Meadow I Doc ID # 22778 Deb Barker City of Federal way P.O. Box 9718 33530 1" Way S. Federal Way, WA 98003-6221 Re: Plat ofDANVllLE STATION DIY. 1 (fonnerly Belle Meadows) City permit #00-I06139-00-en Dear Deb; Please accept this letter as a written response addressing the Hearing Examiner Conditions for the plat ofDanville Station Div. 1. 1. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a landscape plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect shall be submitted to the City for approval, and shall include the following elements: a. Required ten foot Type III arterial street landscape buffer along the 21st Avenue SW frontage; b. Open space area landscaping; Street trees in planter strips inside plat boundaries along the 21 st Avenue SW frontage; c. d. Significant tree replacement plan; and e. Visual screening of the stonnwater infiltration tract from the right- of-way with landscaping and/or fencing. A landscaping plan, addressing the above issues, is being prepared, and will be provided by Schneider Homes, Ine. 2. Prior to final plat approva~ the existing structure on Lots 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 37 must be removed or relocated to confonn to building setbacks requirements as established by the FWCC, or lot lines must be adjusted accordingly. Existing structures on Lots 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 aud 37 have been removed. 3. Final plat approval of the Belle Meadow subdivision shall occur simultaneously with, or subsequent to, final plat approval of the adjacent Keller subdivision in order to extend and provide access from SW 345th Place in the configuration indicated on the preliminary plat drawing. Alternatively, prior to issuance of construction pennits, the preliminary plat drawing shall be revised anËX~ï~tr;e~Jff}tJ}3MITTEL PAGE--LOFrMAR 132003 indicate a revised access configuration from SW 345th Place to the Belle Meadow subdivision that meets all applicable City and Fire Department requirements. The City of Federal Way has been provided a legal description, to be used for the dedication of 345th Place SW, to provide the City with a full right-of-way width. 4. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall revise the plat to redesign the southwest comer ofSW 345th Place and 20th Avenue SW to construct a half-street improvement, including a minimum of20 feet of pavement, curb, gutter, streetlights, a four foot planter strip with street trees, and a five foot sidewalk along the entire Lot 9 frontage. The approved engineering plans and physical construction have addressed this condition. 5. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall revise the plat to remove the radius of the west right-of-way line of 20th Avenue SW along the proposed Lot 8 frontage. The west right-of-way line of 20th Avenue SW along the proposed Lot 8 frontage shall be redesigned to be perpendicular to the southern property line of the site and parallel to the 21st Avenue SW right-of-way. The west right-of-way of 20th Ave. S., as shown on the face of the plat, provides for sidewalks and public utilities to be included in a public right-of-way. 6. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall revise the plat to correctly label 20th Avenue SW and 16th Avenue SW, which are not currently shown. The plat map correctly labels 16th Avenue and 20th Avenue SW. 7. The applicant shall acquire, or arrange for dedication in a form acceptable to the City, sufficient off-site right-of-way as indicated on the Preliminary Plat between the northern property line of the site and the SW 344th Street right-of-way for the extension of 18th Avenue SW. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of ownership, or arrangements for dedication in a form acceptable to the City, of the required 18th Avenue SW off-site right-of-way for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. 8. Dedication of right-of-way for the extension of ISth Avenue SW has been acquired between the site and SW 344th St. Prior to final plat approval, the section of SW 344th from 21 st Avenue SW to 18th Avenue SW, including the full intersection of SW 344th Street and ~~'~Tk 9. 181h Avenue SW, shall be construction, approved, and dedicated to the City. The above construction and dedication has been accomplished. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for two speed humps, one on SW 344th Place and one on SW 3451h Place, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The speed humps shall be designed and located to discourage potential cut-through traffic into adjoining neighborhoods. Traffic calming devices have been installed. 10. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for a raised pedestrian crosswalk at the regional BP A trail crossing on SW 3441h Place, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The approved engineering plans reflect the design for the regional DP A trail crossing. 11. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit desifn and construction plans for street l~hting at the intersections of SW 344' Place and SW 345th Place with 15 Place SW, in the vicinity of the Park Lane Neighborhood, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The street lighting shall be designed and located to enhance overall pedestrian and vehicular safety by increasing visibility. A design of off-site street lighting in the Park Lane neighborhood is to be submitted on Wednesday, March 12,2003, as part of the application for the right-of-way use permit. 12. Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall submit design and construction plans for raised pavement markers along the roadway centerline in the vicinity of SW 3441h Place and 161h Avenue SW, for the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The raised pavement markers shall be located in the areas where there is the potential for vehicular traffic to "drift" across the centerline while traversing curves in the roadway. The approved engineering plans reflect provisions for raised pavement markers. 13. Pursuant to the applicant's proposal to pay a fee-in-lieu of providing the required 63,825 square feet of on site open space, and as provided by the FWCC, the most recent assessed values of all parcels comprising the subdivision site or a current appraisal value determined by an MAl certified appraiser must be submitted to the City to determine the required EXHIBIT 1== P4C'.F 3 õFr 14. 15. open space fee. Payment of the open space fee shall be required before final plat approval. Payment of the fee in lieu of open space was made on February 7, 2002, in the amount of $60,750, Stormwater conveyance, water quality, and infiltration facilities used to control stormwater runofffTom the site shall be located in a stormwater tract dedicated to the City at the time of final plat approvaL unless located within improved public rights-of-way. The City has been provided legal descriptions for use in the statutory warranty deeds, dedicating storm drainage facilities to the City. The final plat drawing must establish the required arterial street landscape buffer along the 21" Avenue SW fTontage in a separate tract to be owned in common and maintained by property owners of the residential subdivision, and prohibiting removal or disturbance of landscaping within the tracts, except as necessary for maintenance or replacement of existing p1antings and as approved by the City. The arterial street landscape buffer along the 21" Avenue SW fTontage shall be maintained in a condition consistent with the approved landscape plan pursuant to Condition No.1, above. The Final Plat reflects an 11' landscape tract with provisions for ownership and maintenance as well as restrictions on the removal or disturbance of vegetation therein. 16. All streets shall have a minimum pavement sections of three inches Class B asphalt over six inches of crushed surfacing to support the traffic loads. Street construction has been completed in conformance with the approved engineering plans. 17. Clearing for the construction of the plat improvements, including roads, stormwater improvements, and utilities, shall be generally consistent with the clearing limits depicted on the Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan that was prepared by the applicant for the preliminary plat process. The clearing limits referenced above are the approximate clearing limits necessary for road, stormwater, improvements, and utility grading, and may be modified with the approval of the Community Development Services and Public Works Departments during final engineering review as required to reflect changes in road, stormwater improvements, and utility designs, if any. The remaining clearing beyond these limits necessary for development of the residential lots shall not be performed until approved permits are issued for development of the residential lots. EXHIBIT --F - PAGE ~_OF ~ Clearing necessary for construction ofthis phase of the plat has been completed. No further clearing is expeded till such time as individual building permits are applied for, 18. Prior to final plat approval, all required improvements must be completed or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. Design and construction of plat improvements shall conform to the FWCC, 1998 KCSWDM, Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, and all other applicable codes and regulations. AIl required improvements are complete except: 1) off-site street lighting, 2) pavement overlay. The City has not yet prepared the bond form. Sincerely, ~ Sean M. Reinicke DMP Inc. EXHIBIT --F PAGE~OF ~ rdiïID RECEIVED OCT;< 2:"')2 schneider homes, inc. -,- ,~ '^;"J"""~"'W" 6510 Southcenter Boulevard.Suite #l.Tukwilo, WA 98188.(206) 248-2471 . flÁXlI!m6) 242c4209,:":('ION October 14, 2002 Ann Dower City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way S Federal Way, WA 98003-6221 Re: Keller-Belle Meadow City permit # 00-1O6139-000-00-EN Dear Ann: In response to your letter of October 3 regarding conditions to allow Belle to be recorded first, your conditions are understood and accepted with one modification. Individual responses are required to: 2) The legal description of the south half ofSW 345th PI right-of-way is being prepared by our surveyor. The City will prepare a statutory warranty deed of which this is a part- 3) Schneider Homes, Inc. does hereby agree that stormwater from public right of way - specifically, ITom the future SW 345th Place - may drain to and will be accepted by the infiltration pond on the Keller property. Schneider Homes, Inc. accepts full responsibility for proper functioning and maintenance of the pond until the final acceptance of the Keller plat by the City, that acceptance occurring after recording and after a two-year maintenance period. 5) The Keller subdivision will be completed within the time allotted by FWCC subsequent to preliminary plat approval. The schedule that was previously submitted to the City is more ambitious, but we cannot promise that that schedule will be adhered to- The economic climate will be a consideration in the decision exact1y~en to proceed with completion of Keller. We would like to have sevet<dÆ1ouses built and sold in Belle before moving on to Keller. Nevertheless, the infiltration pond will be maintained as described above. ,~ De' edson,P.E. ,. ~ I ~ nage ofDevelopment & Î!XHfBlT ~ ! PAGE-LOF .i:... JAN-08-2003 WED 04: 40 PN SCHNEIDER HONES lNG, Po,""ol Nomo SUe Add,,"" Ar.. Code Block FAX NO, 206 242 4209 P, 02 ParceI242103-9074 SCHNEI'PER HOMES INC Parcel Data <42103-9074 SCHNEIDER HOMES INe PmentU.. Zoning Jurl.dôction Property Type Code Lot S;"gk FamHy(Res U",IZooc) RS7.2 FEDERAL WAY R Legal Omrlptlon PCL B OF FEDERAL WAY LLA # B!.AOO-I04047 REC #20010327900006 SD LLA BEING !Á)ÇATED IN N 1/2 OF N -.Ii;> OF NE 1140{~¡¡ 1/4 OFSEC 240;.)-3 Land SqFt Aue. Wa¡"r Sn<..lSepti< Rainier Olymplo. Ca...d« Territorial Seattle Lout",n BanI< Tl4e1Sborc R..trtcted Land Data u.. EUlDptIon Envtro.me.'" No Topograpby No Traßic mOH Views Soolld No LkW..b No LkSunm No LklRlv/Crl< No Other No Waterfront Footll/:e 0 Accett 111gb.. No Pro...Inv!uence No Poor Quality No O:)4'(}18 209.524 4,81 WATER DISTRlCT PUBUC No No No No No No No No No T"" Yr Om," Yr 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 199a 1997 1996 --- BuildinglImprovement Tax Roll History TuValue Reuon Appraised Land Val Imp val Total best prop 220,000 1S1,OOO 200,000 50,000 50, 000 220,000 152,000 2S4,000 96,000 87,000 0 1, 000 54,000 4', 000 37, 000 Page I on TnabIe Land va.¡ Imp Val Total 220,000 151,000 200, 000 50,000 50,000 <5,000 45.700 <5,700 a 123 54,000 <',000 37,000 '9,000 37,100 37,100 220,000 151,123 254,000 '.,000 a7,000 8', 000 82, aoo S2,SOO EXHIBIT J!:t. Þ PAGElOF -1- JAN-08-2003 WED 04:40 PM SGHN~lDER HONES lNG, FAX NO, 206 242 4209 Po 03 ParceI2421O3.9074 SCHNEIDER HOMES INC Sales History E Numb« SaI.D.... Sale Price lI1_e., S.le RUlOo 1839026 1805949 8t2W2OOI 3/1212001 2.528,000 Statutory WlUTaDty Detd 350.000 S"numry Wman¡y De.d Non. No", .-.-' Review History "'..Yr Itn1<w# a.v;.". Ty¡>< .\ppe.1 v.. B<OlÜII Dt 01101/1900 S<ttt<m...t Val Burin¡¡ """11 Sratn, 2002 020074 Review- DestrUCt Complcl«! Permit History Nomber Type Val.. I.... D.... J.rlsdld.,. Review Dt ---. Home Improvement Exemption Ex=pINn BldgNo PaleR"" D.te CÐ~p Beg Yr ¡MCo" -'-'.'-- -- Internet Resources Summary R<pnn for your .me hltp11www .metrokc.govl Assessorl Ar~riall2002/054.pdf Visit Property Tax ln1'á"",tion System 10 &<OetS your tax bill: http1iw<:bapp.me!IUkc.goVlKcrAXINFOItaxiÍ>fo.aap?parceUd-242 1 03 9074&800"';' 1 =S .",d1 Visit Roc<",1s Office's web ,i.. '" vie'" Excis< Tax Affidavits: httpJI{46.129.54.930S193/opdoprd<faulca.sp?==<>p,8=Ut-DnfAnJ, Visi, GIS '....,.1 View", foc tile map of the paroel: http://www5,mcttol<c.gov/wobmaP'/pateelviÛ<ri'!I'1N-2421039074 Gla""", ofT""", . huPJ/www.metrokc,gov/A"""Ssor/eRe..ProI"'I'f)'IGI°"""YTcnns.lltmJ Page 2 00 EXHIBIT t\ iL- PAGE ~OF JAN-08-2003 WED 04:40 PM SCHN~IDER HOMES lNG, Par«l Name Site Add..... Ar.. Cod. Blook ~!'!" O"",rt.«o. La.d SqFI Acr.. Wokr SewerlSeptic Rainier Olympia Ca",ad.. 'rerrltorlal S<attte Lontio. Ba.k TldelSbo.. R..._ted FAX NO. 206 242 4209 ParceI242103-9O20 SCHNEIDER HOMES INC Parcel Data 242103-9020 SCHNEIDER HOMES mc Prete., U.. ".-.Iog Jorlsdldioo Propttty Typ. Code Lo' Single Family(R., UserLono) 1<$7.2 FEDERAl. WAY R 054-<)18 P. 04 N 1/2 91" S 1120FN 112 OnTE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 EX:ORD &<1.ESSpORPERREC#9512050883 209,959 4.82 WATER DISTRICT PUlJuc Land Data Use E1elnpllo. E.VÜ"oameotal No Topoc"phy No Tram. IUGH Views 8o0.d No IX Wa.b No LkSam.. No LlcIRIv/Crk No Otb... No Waterfront 1100..ge 0 Ao:cen1Ugbtl No Pro1. Iøvt...<e No Poor QuaUty No No No No No No No No No No BuildinglImprovement "ax Yr Ooút Yr 200' 2002 2001 2000 1999 199a 1997 1996 .-- Tax Roll IDstory TaxvAl~. R...on Appraised Lan" Val l>1f:> VAl "0...1 Tanble Land val l>1f:> val "otd Dest Prop >S5,000 177.000 169.000 l.9.000 169.000 las,OOO 177,000 169,000 169,000 l69,000 342,000 342,300 342.300 0 117,000 a7,000 76,000 52,000 >S5,000 294.000 256,000 "',000 221,000 0 >4,425 B7.000 ?6.000 52.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 lB5,000 191.425 256,000 245.000 221,000 343,000 34).300 343.300 EXHIBIT ,~ PAGE~õFI \'sge I of2 JAN-08-2003 WED 04: 40 PM SGHN~JDER HONES lNG, FAX NO, 206 242 4209 P, 05 ParceI2421OJ.9020 SCHNEIDER HOMES INC Sales ffistory EN""""r Sale Do'" Sole Priu la""'..e.' Sale Ron.n 183902. 1805946 1732530 8/28/200 I 3/13/2001 1I1~l2oo0 2,528.000 Sta"'tmy Wammty Deed 395,000 Sta."o!')' W"""'ty Ikod 3,800 Olhcr - 8<e Affid.>vit NOlIe Non. -"--.. Review History TnVr I\tv;.".¡¡ Revkw Type Appeal Val Hearlo& Dt 01101/19/10 SettIe_'Vai l!earingResol' S'a'.. 2002 020073 R.oview - Dc.lruc' Compl.",d Permit History Number Type Value IHue Da" JurlJdletio. Re,iew Dt Home Improvement Exemption E...,plNo BldgNo Date Re< Da" c...p BegYr E"Co,t Internet Resources S"""""IY R.opor! for yaW' area; ~ttp:/lwww -=lrukc,gov/ As.c_1 ~<Ien~aJI2OO21O54. pdt Visit Properly Tax 1nfonnatjon System 10 """'" your tax biU: h ttp :/lwdIapp. ft1etroke.guv IJ(CT AXINF OItaxinfu.asp?parœUd =2~ 21 03902 O&"'¡'mi, 1- Visit Record. Office's web oi", to view Excise Tax Affidavit" httpJ/I4é.120.54.9J;81931.prloprdefaullæp?"""""pt&,.,ur=Dcfault Vi,i'GlSP.ttccl Viewer for Ih/, map of <he parcd; http://WWWS...etrolœ.g<>vlwehmaps/parcelvkwCtI'lPIN-2421039O2Q OIo',*",ofTor... http,¡twww.".,lrokc_80VIAssessori<R.oall'roperty/Glo,s,u;yTerms.h1=l Pagc2of2 EXHIBIT .-lL. PAGE~OF ~ 03/~4/2003 02: 02 FAX 360693382/ Ctlt by: .E,,-rth Con~u1tants CC EDWARDS CONSTRUCTIO¡,T ~. 16002 425 746 oaGO; 03/14/,. 12;52PM;J~/l117iPage 2/3 E.<lrtl1 Consultants, lnc. ___n"_"" '-'-... ~--- -- ("",1""".t"""",',""".ß"',(.H~"""""""."'í"",¡",, <"'-II""'. f"'~Dlg"'1V"""'""'I"""~"""" 1-:SI,,1>\is1>,'d "17;; March 14, 2003 E-10532 C. C. Edwards P.O. Box 1600 On:if1g, Washington 98360 Attention: Mr. Jim Holland Subject: Geotechnical Assessment and Subsurface Exploration Site Pavement Areas 2.,"' Avenue and 346'" Street Federal Way. Washington Dear Mr. Holland; In accordance with your request. Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) observed four test holes excavated in the existing pavement areas. The purpose of our investigation was to further assess the potential for pavement settlements. We under::¡tand the propen:y is being developed as a residential subdivision. The underground utilities and the pavement area. including curb and gutter have been completed. We understand the majority of the site work was recently completed during the late summer and fall of 2002. As pan: of our assessment of the paven'ent areas, ECI met at the site with representatives of C. c. Edwards on February 24, 2003. and observed a series of test holes on March 7, 2003. Project History As previously discussed in our recent assessment of the site pavement areas. localized areas of the roadway pavement section have experienced moderate subsidence. At the time of our site visits, the areas of subsidence had been repaired and repaved. Based on our observations and discussions with the contractor, the majority of the settled areas coinciqe with a utility trench alignment. We understand the utility trench backfill at the site consisted predominantly of the on-site native siltY sand with gravel soils. In our opinion. it is likety loça¡¡~ed areas of the trench backfill experienced settlement during the recent winter season. The settlement may have been exasperated by groundwater seepage entering the backfi/! ?onB. To further assess the pavement subgrade where settlements occurred, II series of test holes where excavated in the pavement area. The following is a description of the soil condition observed at the test hole locations. --..'-- ------.. ---.. ._--~#. . D IE05 136th Place N.t.. Suite 201, 8ellevue. WA Bellevue (~25) 643-3780 FAX (425) 746-ü860 Toll Fr { OF ---.. .._-_.._----~ ...-~-~_.. ..,.::-~ 03/~4I2003 02:02 FAX 360893382/.. CC EDWARDS CONSTRUCTION - 141003 ent by: 'Earth Consultants 425 7<16 0860; 03/14/,-- 12:52PM;1~1I117;PBge 313 C. C. Edwards March 1 4, 2003 E-l0532 Page 2 Subsurface Conditions The test holes were e:.:cavated at four locations throughout 'the existing pavement areas where pavement settlements had previously been observed. At the four test hole locations. the pavement section consisted of three inches of asphalt concrete underlain Þv ten inches of dense crushed rock base. A geotexti!e was observed immedia!ely below the crushed rock base. Underlying the asphalt concrete and crushed rock base, silty sand WiTh gravel soils were encountered. The test holes were advanced to a depth of approximarelv 2. fee't below the pavement subgrade elevation. Conclusions Based on Olr observations at the test hole locations, it is our opinion the geotextile and crushed rOCK 'pase observed below the asphalt concrete should adequately mitigate the potel1tial for future settlement. As discussed in our previous assessment of !he pavemen! areas, the proposed overlay of the pavement areas should be: completed after the majoriw of the residential construcTion is completed at the site. We understand completion of the residential construction will likely occur in late spring of 2004. Although we do not believe any future subsidence of the pavement areas will be significant, delaying the overlay will help ensure that futUre subsidence after completion of the overlay will be negligible. ECI should observe the existing pavement areas prior to completing the overlay. We trust ihis assessment meets The geotechnical requirements for the planned overlay. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Raymond A. Coglas, F.E. Project Mal1ager 1~~",,",,'7 1'2."1: ~.:vLi I RAC/e"" Earth Con.,,'..n". Inc. EXHIBIT ~ PAGE~OF z.. ._.,--_.---".~ . MEETING DATE: May 20, 2003 ITEM# :=rz: (1.) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL 8'h Avenue Sand S 3I2'h Street Traffic Signal aud Intersection Improvemeut Project SUBJECT: CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expeuditure Amt.: Coutingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Five (5) bids were received and opened on April 29,2003 at 10:10 a.m. for the 8'h Avenue Sand S 3 I2'h Street Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement project (See bid data below). The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is M.T. Electric with a total bid of $231,445.00. The low bid received was $100,493.00 below the engineers estimate. This appears to be a very favorable and competitive time to bid "signal" type of public works projects. The bids were as follows: Poteleo, Inc. TransTech Electric Signal Electric, Inc. M.T. Electric Totem Electric $275.000.00 $251,391.75 $264,771.25 $231,445.00 $247.970.50 Final Engineers Estimate $331,938.00 The following table shows the estimated costs for design, right of way, and construction of the new traffic signal and turn lanes: Item ("ovt Estimate ("otlVtruetion Evtimate Design Utility Pole Rental Management/Inspection (in-house) King County Signal Review Construction Estimate 10% Construction Contingencv Sub-Total $ 35,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $331,938.00 $ 33 194.00 $408,132.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $231,44500 $ 23 144.50 $297,589.50 Printing Plans and Specifications Advertising $ 1,475.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,475.00 $ 1,600.00 TOTAL Available Budget $411 20700 $430,000.00 $30066450 $430,000.00 Pro'eet Balance $18,793.00 $129,355.50 Staff has worked with M.T. Electric on the S 320lh Street and S 312th Street projects. City staff indicates that the contractor is qnalified to complete the work detailed in the RFB. As a result, City staff believes M.T. Electric can successfully execute the requirements of this contract to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is M.T. Electric in the amount of$231,445.00. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 5, 2003 meeting, the Land Use/Transportation Comnllttee recommended the Council award the 81h Avenue Sand S 3I2'h Street Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement project to M.T. Electric, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $231,445.00, approve a 10% construction contingency of $23,144.50 for a total of $254,895.50, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract PROPOSED MOTION: "I move acceptance of the 81h Avenue Sand S 312th Street Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement project to M.T. Electric, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $231,445.00, approve a 10% construction contingency of$23,I44.50 for a total of$254,895.50, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract" CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: -~... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 0 0 0 APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION MOVED TO SECOND READINC (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # I ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # ~- ~... REVtSED.. 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way DATE: May 5, 2003 TO: SUBJECT: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use / Transportation Committee Ken Miller, P.E., DeputY Director Public Works ~ David H. ~anager 8'h Avenue Sand S 312'h Street Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement Project FROM: VIA: BACKGROUND Five (5) bids were received and opened on Apri129, 2003 at 10:10 a.m. for the 8th Avenue S and S 3l2th Street Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement project (See bid data below). The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is M.T. Electric with a total bid of$23 1,445.00. The low bid received was $100,493.00 below the engineers estimate. This appears to be a very favorable and competitive time to bid "signal" type of public works projects. The bids were as follows: PoteIco, Inc. TransTech Electric Signal Electric, Inc. M.T. Electric Totem Electric $275,000.00 $251,391.75 $264,771.25 $231,445.00 $247,970.50 $331,938.00 Final Engineers Estimate The following table shows the estimated costs for design, right of way, and construction of the new traffic signal and turn lanes: Item Cost Estimate Design $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 UtilitY Pole Rental $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Management/Inspection (in-house) $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 King County Signal Review Construction Estimate $331,938.00 $231,445.00 10% Construction Contingencv $ 33,194.00 $ 23 144.50 $297,589.50 Sub-Total $408,132.00 Printing Plans and Specifications $ 1,475.00 $ 1,475.00 Advertising $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 TOTAL $30066450 $411 207.00 Available Budget $430,000.00 $430,000.00 Staff has worked with M.T. Electric on the S 320th Street and S 31th Street projects. CitY staff indicates that the contractor is qualified to complete the work detailed in the RFB. As a result, CitY staff believes M.T. Electric can successfully execute the requirements of this contract to the CitY's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is M.T. Electric in the amount of $231 ,445.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends placing the following items on the May 20, 2003 Council consent agenda for approval: J. Award the 8th Avenue S and S 31th Street Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvement project to M.T. Electric, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $23 I ,445.00 and approve a 10% construction contingency of $23, 144.50 for a total of $254,895.50. 2. Authorize the CitY Manager to execute the contract. KM:dl cc: Project File k:\I,w\2003\8th ""'"" "," ,312th " trnffi"igml..dinte""tion.dot CITY OF FEDERAL WAV 8 Avonue SIS 312 St...t Signal BID TABULATION April 29, 2003 SCHEDULE A - 8th Avenue South at South 312th S"'et Signal Englnm, E,tlmate MT ELECTIC TOTEM ELECTRIC TRANSTECH ELECTIC SIGNAL ELECTRIC POTELCO ITEM APPROX UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID 1 SP l-D2.6, SP 1-10.5 T"'ffie Contml Labor 1200 HR $34.00 $40,800.00 $34.00 $40,800.00 $34.00 $40800.00 $34.00 $40,800.00 $34.00 $40,800.00 $34.00 $40 800.00 2 SP 1-D5.4 Roedway Surveying 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2 500.00 $2,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 3 SP 1-D9.1 Mob;rlzat~n 1 LS $22,000.00 $22000.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 $11 000.00 $11,000.00 $23,150.00 $23150.00 $23000.00 $23,000.00 $27,000.00 $21 000.00 4 SP 2-Dl.5 Roadside Cleanup 1 FA $15,000.00 $15000.00 $15,000.00 $15000.00 $15000.00 $15,000.00 $15000.00 $16000.00 $15000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $1~000.00 5 SP 2-D2.6 Remo~ng Cement Cone. S~ewalk 195 SV $10.00 $1,950.00 $34.00 $6 630.00 $16.00 $3510.00 $36.10 $1166.50 $35.15 $6,971.25 $31.40 $1293.00 6 SP 2-D2.5 Removing Cement Cone. Curb and Gut!" 225 IF $5.00 $1 125.00 $12.00 $2,700.00 $7.50 $1681.50 $13.00 $2925.00 $12.75 $2,868.15 $13.20 $2910.00 1 SP 2-D3.5 Excovallon and Embankment 1 lS $2,500.00 $2 500.00 $2,500.00 $2 500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2 500.00 $2 500.00 $3 000.00 $3,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 8 SP 8-04.5 Cement Cone. Curb and Gut!" 225 IF $30.00 $6 150.00 $16.00 $3600.00 $15.50 $3,481.50 $11.30 $3892.50 $11.00 $3825.00 $11.60 $3 960.00 9 SS 8-D1.5 Type C Block Traffic Curb 35 IF $8.00 $280.00 $25.00 $815.00 $26.15 $936.25 $21.00 $945.00 $21.50 $962.50 $14.30 $500.50 10 SS 8-09.5 Raised Pavement Mark" Type 2 .55 HUND $800.00 $440.00 $500.00 $215.00 $535.00 $294.25 $540.00 $291.00 $525.00 $288.15 $500.00 $215.00 11 SP 8-14.5 Cement Cone. Sidewalk 230 SV $40.00 $9200.00 $31.00 $1130.00 $21.00 $6210.00 $33.50 $1,105.00 $33.00 $1590.00 $34.10 $1 843.00 12 SP 8-20.5 Signelizalion System, Complete 1 lS $185000.00 $185000.00 $118513.00 $118513.00 $140,400.00 $140400.00 $120,893.00 $120893.00 $136 100.00 $136,100.00 $148,025.30 $148 025.30 13 SP 8-22.5 Removing Pavement Markings 1 lS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2 500.00 $2 500.00 $2615.00 $2615.00 $2 650.00 $2 650.00 $2 625.00 $2625.00 $1,000.00 $1 000.00 14 SS 8-22.5 Paint Une 1355 IF $1.25 $1693.15 $0.40 $542.00 $0.40 $542.00 $0.36 $514.90 $0.40 $542.00 $0.22 $296.10 15 SS 8-22.5 Painted Wode Une 250 IF $1.50 $315.00 $1.00 $250.00 $0.55 $131.50 $0.55 $131.50 $0.55 $131.50 $0.22 $55.00 16 SS 8-22.5 Plastic Cmsswalk Uno 510 SF $10.00 $5100.00 $6.00 $3,060.00 $3.20 $1 632.00 $3.25 $1 851.50 $3.15 $1,606.50 $4.40 $2,244.00 11 SS 8.22.5 Plastic Stop Une 145 IF $20.00 $2 900.00 $12.00 $1140.00 $4.30 $623.50 $4.33 $627.85 $420 $609.00 $4.68 $618.60 18 SS 8-22.5 Plastic Traffic AITow 5 EA $175.00 $815.00 $135.00 $615.00 $125.00 $625.00 $108.00 $540.00 $105.00 $525.00 $11.50 $351.50 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE A $300 488.15 $215150.00 $234 560.50 $234 691.75 $249651.25 $265 300.00 SCHEDULE B. SI nallnterconneet ITEM APPROX UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BID PRICE BIO PRICE BID PRICE BID 1 SP l-D2.6, SP 1-10.5 Traffic Control labor 50 HR $34.00 $1,100.00 $34.00 $1100.00 $34.00 $1100.00 $34.00 $1100.00 $34.00 $1 100.00 $34.00 $1100.00 2 SP 8-20.5 Interconnect System, Complete 1 lS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $13,995.00 $13,995.00 $11,710.00 $11,110.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $13,420.00 $13,420.00 $6,000.00 $8,000.00 SUBTOTAL SCHEDULE B $31100.00 $15695.00 $13410.00 $16100.00 $15120.00 $9100 00 GRAND TOTAL $332,166.15 $231,445.00 $241,910.50 $251,391.15 $264,711.25 $275,000.00 KJT~"""ONSTRUCTION PROJECT5I200~8S312181d """",,..., MEETING DATE: May 20, 2003 ITEM# ~ ~) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: SW Dash Point Road at Sth Avenue SW Road and Signal Improvement Project, Final Acceptance and Authorization to Release the Retainage CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ A TT ACHMENTS: Memo to Land Useffransportation Committee dated May 5, 2003 SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Prior to release of retain age on any Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and Department of Labor and Industries requirements. The final cost for the Poteko, Inc. SW Dash Point Road at 8'h A venue SW Road and Signal Improvement construction contract (AG #02c052) is $507,797.52. This cost is $43,084.50 below the approved construction contract budget of$550,882.02 (includes contingency). CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 5, 2003 meetinf' the Land Useffransportation Committee recommended the acceptance of the Poteko Inc. Inc. SW Dash Point Road at 8' Avenue SW Road and Signal Improvement Project (AG#02-052), in the amount of $507,797.52 as complete and give authorization to release the retainage. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move acceptance of the Potelco Inc, inc. SW Dash Point Road at 8'h Avenue SW Road and Signal Improvement Project (AG#02-052), in the amount of $507,797.52 as complete and give authorization to release the retainage." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~ \ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 0 0 0 APPROVED DENIED T ABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances 0,,11') COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED-O5/IO/2001 ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way DATE: May 5, 2003 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use / Transportation Conunittee ~ FROM: Ken Miller, P.E., Deputy Director Public Works David H. ~anager SW Dash Point Road at 8th Avenue SW Road and Signal Improvement Project, Final Acceptance and Authorization to Release the Retainage VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND Prior to release of retain age on any Public Works construction project, the City Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and Department of Labor and Industries requirements. The final cost for the Potelco, Inc. SW Dash Point Road at 8th Avenue SW Road and Signal Improvement construction contract (AG #02-052) is $507,797.52. This cost is $43,084.50 below the approved construction contract budget of $550,882.02 (includes contingency). RECOMMENDATION Staffreconunends placing the following item on the May 20,2003 Council Consent Agenda for approval: Acceptance of the Potelco mc, Inc. SW Dash Point Road at 8th Avenue SW Road and Signal Improvement Project (AG#O2-052), in the amount of $507,797.52 as complete and authorization to release the retainage. KM:dl cc: Project File! AG #02-052 Day File k:"""'\2003"w d.,h po;", ro,d " 8th >Y' ro,d ,"d ,;gnal.d<>e ITEM# ~(jJ MEETING DATE: May 20, 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: South 288'. Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection Improvements- Bid Award CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ¡g¡ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Five (5) bids were received and opened on April 23, 2003 at 10:10 a.m. for the South 288'h Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection Improvements Project (See attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Frank Coluccio Construction Co. with a total bid of $1 ,602,840.66. Reference checks on Frank Coluccio Construction Co. by both CH2M Hill. Inc and City staff indicates that the contractor has perfonned similar work. As a result, City staff believes Frank Coluccio Construction Co. can successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Frank Coluccio Construction Co. in the amount of$ 1,602,840.66. PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Construction Low Bid $t,602,840 Includes Lakehaven Utility District water and sewer line relocation costs TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 160,840 $ 150,000 $ 219,280 $ 425,780 $ 150,000 $2.708740 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management Planning and Design Right of Way Acquisition Underground Conversion (estimate) AVAILABLE FUNDING: Total Grant Funding $t,569,520 TIA $1,201,270. RES $300,000, WSDOT $68,250 Transfer in Street CIP Fund $ 468,000 $ 500,000 $ 12,222 Transfer tTom CIP Unallocated Mitigation Interest Earning Lakehaven Utility District QWEST AT&T TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $ 21,813 $ 242,040 $ 56,187 $ 15.575 $2885357 PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 176,617 'This is an estimated cost for ROW acquisition because three (3) parcels remain outstanding and fina11egal billing has not been received. However, the ROW acquisition estimate as well as the project balance is sufficient to cover any additional costs. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 5, 2003 meeting, the Land Use/Transportation Committee recommended the Council award the S 288th Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection project to Frank Coluccio Construction Co. as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount 0[$1,602,840.66, and approve a 10% contingency of $160,284.00 for a total of $1,763,124.66. Award of Schedule B (Lakehaven's portion of the project) is contingent upon Lakehaven Utility District Board approval to award Schedule B as bid. The Land Use/Transportation Committee also recommends that the Council authorize the City Manager to execute the contract PROPOSE I> MOTION: "I move acceptance of the Bid for S 288th Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection project to Frank Coluccio Construction Co. as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $1,602,840.66, and approve a 10% contingency of $160,284.00 for a total of $1,763,124.66, and the award of Schedule B (Lakehaven's portion of the project) contingent upon Lakehaven Utility District Board approval to award Schedule B as bid, and to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract" CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIEI> 0 TABLEDfDEFERREDINO ACTION 0 MOVE I> TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COllNClL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOU'TION# REVISED-O5i102001 ~ CITY OF tIfI1""' ...-? Federal Way DATE: May 5, 2003 SUBJECT: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use / Transportation Committee ~) ~ Marwan Salloum, P.E., Street Systems Manager& David H. M~ger South 288'. Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection Improvements- Bid Award TO: FROM: VIA: BACKGROUND: Five (5) bids were received and opened on April 23, 2003 at 10:10 a.m. for the South 288th Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection Improvements Project (See attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Frank Coluccio Construction Co. with a total bid of$I,602,840.66. Reference checks on Frank Coluccio Construction Co. by both CH2M Hill. Inc and City staff indicates that the contractor has performed similar work. As a result, City staff believes Frank Coluccio Construction Co. can successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Frank Coluccio Construction Co. in the amount of$ 1,602,840.66. PROJECT ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES: Construction Low Bid $1,602,840 Includes Lakehaven Utility District water and sewer line relocation costs 10% Construction Contingency Construction Management Planning and Design Right of Way Acquisition Underground Conversion (estimate) TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 160,840 $ 150,000 $ 219,280 $ 425,780 $ 150,000 $2708.740 AVAILABLE FUNDING: Total Grant Funding $1,569,520 TIA $1,201,270, HES $300,000, WSDOT $68,250 Transfer in Street CIP Fund $ 468,000 $ 500,000 Transfer /Tom CIP Unallocated Mitigation Interest Earning Lakehaven UtilitY District QWEST AT&T TOTAL AVAILABLE BUDGET $ 12,222 $ 21,813 $ 242,040 $ 56,187 $ 15.575 $2.885.357 PROJECT BUDGET BALANCE $ 176,617 'This is an estimated cost for ROW acquisition because three (3) parcels remain outstanding and final legal billing has not been received. However, the ROW acquisition estimate as well as the project balance is sufficient to cover any additional costs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends placing the following items on the May 20,2003 Council consent agenda for approval: I. Award the S 288'h Street at SR-99 Signal and Intersection project to Frank Coluccio Construction Co. the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $1,602,840.66, and approve a 10% contingency of$I60,284.00 for a total of$I,763,I24.66. Award of Schedule B (Lakehaven's portion ofthe project) is contingent upon Lakehaven UtilitY District Board approval to award Schedule B as bid. 2. Authorize the CitY Manager to execute the contract. MS:dl co: Projec, File k~utc\2003\Û88'h ",,"" SR99, Bid Aw"d,doc MEETING DATE: May 20, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Purchase of Replacement Backhoe - Authorization to Award to Lowest Responsive Bidder CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [8J 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $80,000.00 $79,096.52 $0 ATTACHMENTS: SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Six (6) bids were received and opened on April 2]", 2003 for the Public Works Surface Water Management Replacement Backhoe RFB #03-108 purchase of one (]) new/unused construction grade combination front- end Ioaderlbackhoe (See attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Pape' Machinery with a base bid of $55,488.00, tax included and a total bid with all requested options of $75,45].72 including tax. Additionally, each vendor was requested to provide costs for extended warranties of 36 months and 60 months. Pape' Machinery is able to provide the 36-month waITanty for $2,482.82 and a 60-month warranty for $3,644.80. AVAILABLE FUNDING The budget for the replacement backhoe is $80,000.00 and will come out of replacement reserves budget 504-] ] 00-049-548-78-640. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 5, 2003 meeting, the Land UsefTransportation Committee recommended the Council award the bid to Pape' Machinery for the Supply and Delivery for one (I) new/unused construction grade combination ITont-end loaderlbackhoe, RFB # 03-108, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $75,451.72 including tax for the base unit and options A through H, and approve the purchase of the 60-month extended warranty at $3,644.80 including tax for a total of $79,096.52 and to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to award the bid to Pape' Machinery for the Supply and Delivery for one (]) new/unused construction grade combination ITont-end loaderlbackhoe, RFB # 03-]08, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $75,451.72 including tax for the base unit and options A through H, and approve the purchase of the 60-month extended warranty at $3,644.80 including tax for a total of $79,096.52 and to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~{\ \ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLEDffiEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way DATE: May 5, 2003 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use / Transportation Committee FROM: Paul A. Bucich, P.E., Surface Water Manager David H. ~ager Purchase of Replacement Backhoe - Authorization to Award to Lowest Responsive Bidder VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND Six (6) bids were received and opened on April 21 ",2003 for the Public Works Surface Water Management Replacement Backhoe RFB #03-108 purchase of one (1) new/unused construction grade combination ITont-end loaderlbackhoe (See attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The apparent lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Pape' Machinery with a base bid of $55,488.00, tax included and a total bid with all requested options of $75,451.72 including tax. Additionally, each vendor was requested to provide costs for extended warranties of36 months and 60 months. Pape' Machinery is able to provide the 36-month warrantY for $2,482.82 and a 60-month warrantY for $3,644.80. AVAILABLE FUNDING The budget for the replacement backhoe is $80,000.00 and will come out of replacement reserves budget 504- 1100-049-548-78-640. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends placing the following items on the May 20, 2003 Council consent agenda for approval: I. Award the bid to Pape' Machinery for the Supply and Delivery for one (I) new/unused construction grade combination front-end loaderlbackhoe, RFB # 03-108, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in the amount of $75,45 1.72 including tax for the base unit and options A through H, and approve the purchase of the 60-month extended warrantY at $3,644.80 including tax for a total of $79,096.52. 2. Authorize the CitY Manager to execute the contract. PB:dl cc: SWM Backhoe File k:~utc\2()()3\swm backhoe awa<ddoc MEETING DATE: May 20, 2003 ITEM# :v: (Iv) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Surface Water Infrastructure Maintenance and Service Contract - Bid Award CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $268,341.00 $268,341.00 $0 ATTACHMENTS: SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Eigl¡t (8) bids were received and opened on April 21, 2003 for the Surface Water Infrastructure Maintenance and Service "On-Call" Contract, RFB#03- I 05 (See attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The apparent lowest responsive bidder is Everson's EconoVac with a total bid of $144,450.00 utilizing the alternative disposal site ofTPS in Tacoma. Everson's has been a prior contractor to the City for this service (1998 to 2001). Past experience with the Contractor demonstrates they are qualified to complete the work detailed in the RFB. City staff believes Everson's EconoVac can successfully execute the requirements of this contract to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Everson's EconoVac in the amount of$I44,450.00. AVAILABLE FUNDING The approved budget for the Surface Water Utility allocates $134,735.00 for this service in 2003 and $133,606.00 in 2004. In an effort to control costs for 2004, the Utility has approached the contractor to detennine their interest in holding the unit prices fixed to the 2003 bid prices for 2004 if the contract were written for 18 months instead of the remaining six in 2003. The contractor has agreed and therefore the Utility is recommending that a contract be executed for the total budgeted amount ($268,341.00) for 2003 and 2004, with the understanding that expenditures in 2003 will not exceed the budgeted amount of $134,735.00. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its May 5, 2003 meeting, the Land Use/Transportation Committee recommended the Council award the Surface Water Infrastructure Maintenance and Service "On-Call" contract to Everson's EconoVac, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $268,341.00 for a period of 18 months ending on 12/31/04 (the contract is to rellect the unit prices listed in the bid received 4/21/03) and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract PROPOSED MOTION: "I move acceptance of the Surface Water Infrastructure Maintenance and Service "On-Call" contract to Everson's EconoVac, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $268,341.00 for a period of I X months ending on 12/31/04 (the contract is to rellect the umt prices listed in the bid received 4/21/03) and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract" CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF fill""' --'"" Federal Way DATE: May 5, 2003 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee FROM: SUBJECT: Paul A. Bucich, P.E., Surface Water Manager David H. ~anager Surface Water ¡;¿r~st~uàure Maintenance and Service Contract - Bid Award VIA: BACKGROUND Eight (8) bids were received and opened on April 21, 2003 for the Surface Water Infrastructure Maintenance and Service "On-Call" Contract, RFB#03-1 05 (See attached Bid Tabulation Summary). The apparent lowest responsive bidder is Everson's EconoVac with a total bid of$I44,450.00 utilizing the alternative disposal site ofTPSin Tacoma. Everson's has been a prior contractor to the City for this service (1998 to 2001). Past experience with the Contractor demonstrates they are qualified to complete the work detailed in the RFB. City staff believes Everson's EconoVac can successfully execute the requirements oflhis contract to the City's satisfaction. Therefore the lowest responsive, responsible bidder is Everson's EconoVac in the amount of$144,450.00. AVAILABLE FUNDING The approved budget for the Surface Water Utility allocates $134,735.00 for this service in 2003 and $133,606.00 in 2004. In an effort to control costs for 2004, the Utility has approached the contractor to determine their interest in holding the unit prices fixed to the 2003 bid prices for 2004 if the contract were written for 18 months instead of the remaining six in 2003. The contractor has agreed and therefore the Utility is recommending that a contract be executed for the total budgeted amount ($268,341.00) for 2003 and 2004, with the understanding that expenditures in 2003 will not exceed the budgeted amount of$134,735.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends placing the following items on the May 20, 2003 Council consent agenda for approval: 1. Award the Surface Water Infrastructure Maintenance and Service "On-Call" contract to Everson's Econo V ac, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder in the amount of $268,341.00 for a period of 18 months ending on 12/31/04. The contract is to reflect the unit prices listed in the bid received 4/21/03. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. PRdl c", Day File """tc\2003l..c,""on"'" awan! rib 03- tO5.doc MEETING DATE: May 20,2003 ITEM# ~ ?) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 1-5/ S 272"0 Street Interchange CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [g] 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The 1-5 interchange at S 272"0 Street has been under consideration for improvements since Sound Transit proposed to construct Direct Access HOV ramps at this location (see Figure A3) as part of the Sound Move Imtiative. In the preliminary engineering and environmental review process (with participation from staff of WSDOT, King County Roads, King Coooty Metro, City of Kent, and Federal Way Public Works and Community Development staff), it was detennined that due to topographical and environmental constraints, a dlfect access ramp would have be located so far north of S 272'" Street that Sound Transit would not actually use the direct access ramp itself, and therefore has limited beneiìt to them, rhe preferred alternative in their Environmental Assessment was an In-Line Station (shown in Figure A2), essentially a bus stop m the median of the freeway, saving about $7 million, which has smce been transferred to the Federal Way Transit Center in Cl1y Center. The City took the position then that Sound Transit would not be delivering all project elements that were approved by the voters in the Soood Move Initiative by not allowing direct HOY access between S 272"' Street and 1-5 HOY lanes. To help mitigate these concerns, Sound Transit conducted a study to develop alternatives to improve operations of the mterchange itself. The preferred alternative from that study recommended providing additional through lanes on S 272'" Street underneath 1-5, without replacing the bridges, and constructing an eastbound to northbound loop ramp in the southeast quadrant of the interchange (see Figure A7), WSDOT was concerned that this alternative would not adequately address the long-tenn needs of the interchange. These concerns were compounded by the discovery that an additional southbound lane would need to be constructed on 1-5 in order to mItigate the turbulence generated on 1-5 traffic flow by the interjection of the SR-509 extension. It should be noted that FHW A has issued a Record of Decision approving the EIS for the SR-509 extensIOn, ro limit their exposure to potential mitigation, Sound Transit conducted another study of the interchange in an attempt to demonstrate that the In-Line Station was their only reasonable altematl\'e, This study was unifonnIy rejected by all other project partners for its skewed analysis. WSDOT also commissioned its own study to consider desigu alternatives iÓr the interchange assuming complete reconstruction, and concluded that a Single Point Urban Interchange (Spur) with Direct Access HOY ramps (see Figure A I) would adequately serve all users through 2030. WIth this level of dissension, it is apparent that there is a need to develop an alternative that everyone could support in order for any future project to be constructed and funded, Although the interchange' is WSDOT's responsibility, S 272" Street is in the CIty of Kent's jurisdiction, and Federal Way City Limits are the south right-of-way line, According to the Sound Transit Environmental Assessment, the interchange ramp tenninaIs at S 272'" Street will fail the City's LOS standard by 2005, hence the City', interest is assuring adequate capacity for development in the Ill>rthem section of Federal Way. DESIGN CHARRETTE To develop a consensus solution, WSDOT proposed to conduct a weeklong design charrette. This process involved a Study Team representing WSDOT, Sound Transit, King County Metro, King County Roads, and the cities of Federal Way and Kent. A core team that worked the whole week consisted of the consultant tearn and staff from Federal Way and Kent. The total cost was $45,000.00 of which the City contributed $5,000.00. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The process included the following tasks: I. The consultant team met separately in pre-charrette meetings with each project partner to identify project issues and needs. A kickoff meeting summarized and clarified the results of the pre-charrette meetings. The core tearn reviewed previous studies and brainstormed conceptual solutions. The core tearn developed and evaluated the proposed concepts. Project partners met to review and screen out less viable concepts. Remaining concepts were evaluated in detail, considering cost, constructability, and environmental impacts. The core team presented the refined concepts to project partners. The results of the design charrette was a recommendation for two alternatives for a more detailed analysis that all project partners consider feasible and meet all project goals. Concept I is the SPlIl. Concept 6A (see Figure A6) eliminates signalized intersections at the current off-ramp locations and moves them to Military Road and 26th Avenue S. Concept 1 is more expensive and is not as pedestrian-friendly for providIng access to In-Line Transit Station. Concept 6 requires additional right-of-way and may have more environmental impacts, particularly with respect to wetlands. NEXT STEPS WSDOT is concerned that failure to continue development of the project could imperil its potential to be funded, either through thc Regional Transportation Investment District or through grant hInds. Note that there is no funding for this project in the current law budget or the gas tax increase. If the project is included III the RTID package, WSDOT will be responsible to delivering a project within 20% of the estimate used in the package; therefore WSDOT would like to have additional design work completed in order to improve its level of confidence that regardIng the resources necessary to complete the project. WSDOT has suggested additional work be performed to further develop the project, investigate potential environmental issues, dcvelop better cost estimates, and build support for the project. To that end, they have proposed to execute a $150,000 consultant contract, and are requesting that the City of Federal Way pHn ide $25,000 towards this work. Sound Transit would provide $75,000, WSDOT $25,000, and City of Kent $25,000. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At Its May 5, 2003 meeting, the Land Useffransportation Committee recommended the Council authorize the City Manager to execute an inter-agency agreement to provide funding up to $ I 0,000 and in-kind services for the 1-5 / S 272nd Street Interchangc project to be funded from the street fund and/or City Manager's Contingency fund as appropriate. PROPOSED MOTION: "] move that Council authorize the City Manager to execute an inter-agency agreement to provide up to $10,000 and in-kind services for further development of the 1-5! S ~72nd Street Interchange project to be funded from the st.reet fund and/or the City Manager's Continge~ CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: \ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDffiEFERREDfNO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 ~ CITY OF ~ Federal Way DATE: May 5, 2003 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee VIA: David H. SUBJECT: 1-5 I S 272od Street Interchange BACKGROUND The 1-5 interchange at S 272od Street has been under consideration for improvements since Sound Transit proposed to construct Direct Access HOV ramps at this location (see Figure A3) as part of the Sound Move Initiative. In the preliminary engineering and envirorunental review process (with participation from staff ofWSDOT, King County Roads, King CountY Metro, CitY of Kent, and Federal Way Public Works and CommunitY Development staff), it was determined that due to topographical and environmental constraints, a direct access ramp would have be located so far north ofS 27200 Street that Sound Transit would not actually use the direct access ramp itself, and therefore has limited benefit to them. The preferred alternative in their Envirorunental Assessment was an In-Line Station (shown in Figure A2), essentially a bus stop in the median of the freeway, saving about $7 million, which has since been transferred to the Federal Way Transit Center in CitY Center. The CitY took the position then that Sound Transit would not be delivering all project elements that were approved by the voters in the Sound Move Initiative by not allowing direct HOV access between S 27200 Street and 1-5 HOV lanes. To help mitigate these concerns, Sound Transit conducted a study to develop alternatives to improve operations ofthe interchange itself. The preferred alternative from that study recommended providing additional through lanes on S 27200 Street underneath 1-5, without replacing the bridges, and constructing an eastbound to northbound loop ramp in the southeast quadrant of the interchange (see Figure A7). WSDOT was concerned that this alternative would not adequately address the long-tenn needs of the interchange. These concerns were compounded by the discovery that an additional southbound lane would need to be constructed on 1-5 in order to mitigate the turbulence generated on 1-5 traffic flow by the interjection of the SR-509 extension. It should be noted that FHW A has issued a Record of Decision approving the EIS for the SR-509 extension. To limit their exposure to potential mitigation, Sound Transit conducted another study of the interchange in an attempt to demonstrate that the In-Line Station was their only reasonable alternative. This study was unifonlliy rejected by all other project partners for its skewed analysis. WSDOT also commissioned its own study to consider design alternatives for the interchange assuming complete reconstruction, and concluded that a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) with Direct Access HOV ramps (see Figure AI) would adequately serve all users through 2030. With this level of dissension, it is apparent that there is a need to develop an alternative that everyone could support in order for any future project to be constructed and funded. Although the interchange is WSDOT's responsibility, S 272,d Street is in the CitY of Kent's jurisdiction, and Federal Way City Limits are the south right-of-way line. According to the Sound Transit Envirorunental Assessment, the interchange ramp terminals at S 272od Street will fail the City's LOS standard by 2005, hence the City's' interest is assuring adequate capacity for development in the northern section of Federal Way. DESIGN CHARRETTE To develop a consensus solution, WSDOT proposed to conduct a weeklong design charrette. This process involved a Study Team representing WSDOT, Sound Transit, King County Metro, King County Roads, and the cities of Federal Way and Kent. A core team that worked the whole week consisted ofthe consultant team and stafffTom Federal Way and Kent. The total cost was $45,000.00 of which the City contributed $5,000.00. The process included the following tasks: t. The consultant team met separately in pre-chaITette meetings with each project partner to identify project issues and needs. A kickoff meeting sununarized and clarified the results of the pre-chaITette meetings. The core team reviewed previous studies and brainstonned conceptual solutions. The core team developed and evaluated the proposed concepts. Project partners met to review and screen out less viable concepts. Remaining concepts were evaluated in detail, considering cost, constructability, and environmental impacts. The core team presented the refined concepts to project partners. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The results of the design charrette was a reconunendation for two alternatives for a more detailed analysis that all project partners consider feasible and meet all project goals. Concept 1 is the SPUI. Concept 6A (see Fign,re A6) eliminates signalized intersections at the CUITent off-ramp locations and moves them to Military Road and 26 Avenue S. Concept 1 is more expensive and is not as pedestrian-friendly for providing access to In-Line Transit Station. Concept 6 requires additional right-of-way and may have more environmental impacts, particularly with respect to wetlands. NEXT STEPS WSDOT is concerned that failure to continue development of the project could imperil its potential to be funded, either through the Regional Transportation Investment District or through grant funds. Note that there is no funding for this project in the CUITent law budget or the gas tax increase. ¡fthe project is included in the RTID package, WSDOT will be responsible to delivering a project within 20% ofthe estimate used in the package; therefore WSDOT would like to have additional design work completed in order to improve its level of confidence that regarding the resources necessary to complete the project. WSDOT has suggested additional work be perfonned to further develop the project, investigate potential environmentat issues, develop better cost estimates, and build support for the project. To that end, they have proposed to execute a $150,000 consultant contract, and are requesting that the City of Federal Way provide $25,000 towards this work. Sound Transit would provide $75,000, WSDOT $25,000, and City of Kent $25,000. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests direction as to how the Council wishes the City to participate in the further development of the 1-5 / S 272"d Street interchange project. Alternatives include: "",,4f' ï<J /:ì ---T£-IDIL ~ This is not a budgeted work item. It could be potentially funded at .f25,000 or some lower amount, from the City Manager's Contingency fund. e} The City could offer in-kind services, although we do not do design in-house, so our ability to do this is limited, probably to providing baseline data, traffic analysis, or public involvement. X The City could take no action, since the interchange is not the City's responsibility. RPúl I'COjec' File ",,",,"".1 moo '"Ie"h.nge Cham"e.dno MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Washington Conservation Corps InterIocaI Agreement CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: I2J 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee action form dated May 2, 2003; Washington Conservation Corps InterIocaI Agreement sui\iMARVÍÌlAêKGROUND:As ¡;ä;.t ~f the mitigäiion pI;;;; for Celebration pä~k the city is req~;~ëd to have a five- year plan in which to establish an 80% cover of native vegetation within designated areas. Within this mitigated area there can be no exotic plants such as Scot's broom or Himalayan blackberry. There has been a wide spread establishment of Scot's broom and other species which the Parks Department has been attempting to eradicate with seasonal and volunteer help over the past three years. In an attempt to resolve this situation we looked into contracting for the next two years and found it to be cost prohibitive ITom the private sector. We discovered the Washington Conservation Corps (WCe), which is part ofthe State Ecology Department, have crews that specialize in this type of mitigation work. WCC will provided a six member crew, which includes a supervisor, transportation, equipment, tools and experience for an "at cost" rate. The interIocaI rate for this service and equipment is $3500 per week, which breaks down to approximately $14.58 an hour. After accessing the site and the amount of workload remaining, I recommend allocating up to five weeks per year (2003, 2004) to the WCC interlocal agreement for a total often weeks and a grand total of$35,000. Funding for these services will be covered out of the 2003 facility maintenance contract account. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to place this item on Councils May 20th consent agenda with a "do pass" recommendation to accept the interlocal agreement with the Department of Ecology, Washington Conservation Corps for the amount of $35,000 for a one-year period. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Washington Conservation Corps Interlocal Agreement as presented." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED COUNCIL BILL # 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.C City of Federal Way Parks, Recreation and CulturaJ Services Department MEMORANDUM Date: May 2, 2003 To: PRHSPS Council Committee Steve Ikerd, Pr perty Services Manager 'S¡::.. David Mos anager From: Via: Subject: Background As part of the mitigation plan for Celebration Park the city is required to have a five-year plan in which to establish an 80% cover of native vegetation within designated areas. Within this mitigated area there can be no exotic plants such as Scot's broom or Himalayan blackberry. Unfortunately there has been a wide spread establishment of Scot's broom and other species which the Parks Department has been attempting to eradicate with seasonal and volunteer help over the past three years. We have becn very successful in reaching the 80% native cover, but are stil1 battling the exotics. The drawback to using seasonal help for this task is they are not available for many other Park and Facility task, which ends up getting deferred. In an attempt to resolve this situation we looked into contracting for the next two years and found it to be cost prohibitivc from thc privatc scctor. We discovered the Washington Conservation Corps (WCe), which is part of the State Ecology Department, have crews that specialize in this type mitigation work. WCC will provided a six membcr crew, which includes a supervisor, transportation, equipmcnt, to01s and experience for an "at cost" rate. The interIoca1 rate for this service and equipment is $3500 per week, which breaks down to approximately $14.58 an' hour. After accessing the site and the amount of workload rcmaining, I recommend allocating up to five weeks per year (2003, 2004) to the WCC inter10ca] agrecment for a total often weeks and a grand total of $35,000. Funding for these services will be covered out of the 2003 facility maintenance contract account. Parks will continue to use voIuntccrs to supp1ement re1ated task. Recommendation Staff recommends the PRHSPS Council Committee to p1ace the following recommendation on the May 20, 2003 Council Consent Agenda: To accept the interloca1 agreement with the Department of EcoJogy, Washington Conservation Corps for the amount of$35,000 for a one year period. Committee Recommendation Motion to p1ace this item on Counci1's May 20th conscnt agenda with a "do pass" recommendation to accept the inter10ca1 agreement with the Department of Ecology, Washington Conservation Corps for the amount of$35,000 for a onc-ycar pcriod. =~ Com ittee ember &\ wee AGREEMENT NO. W', -1 ,,-om .. .. " '" . " " , E'é'o't'ö'G'Y WASHINGTON CONSERV A nON CORPS SPONSOR CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT made by and between the State of Washington Department of Ecology Conservation Corps, hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT," and that entity whose name appears in item 1, below, hereinafter referred to as the "SPONSOR." 1. SPONSOR: City of Federal Way 2. CONTACTS 3. ADDRESS: 33530 1.' Way South DEPT. PROJECT LEADER Nicholas Matt (360) 407-6946 PO Box 9718 SPONSOR CONTACT Steve Ikerd (253) 661-4079 Federal Way, WA CRE. SUPERVISOR 98063-9718 OTHER SPONSOR fISCAl OfFICER 4. PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION: Celebration Park 5. PROJECT LOCATION: City of Federal Way 6. SCOPE OF WORK: Wetland maintenance and other work as needed 7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: CONTRACT BEGINS: 4/1/03 CONTRACT ENDS: 4/30/04 8. MAXIMUM BUDGET REIMBURSED to DEPARTMENT Provided by DEPARTMENT Cost Provided by SPONSOR/DONA TrONS COST WCC Crew labor for 10 weeks $0 $ 35,000 Total DEPARTnENT Co" $0 Toto' SPONSOR COST $ 35,000 Above cost Not to be Exceeded 10. Special Terms and Conditions ŒJ No 0 Yes (See XVII.) 11. Biennial Closures: In accordance with biennial closing procedures, the sponsor must REMARKS reimburse the DEPARTMENT no later than June 30 2004 for services or material suppl ied under this contract when submitted for payment on properly itemized vouchers (Form A-19). AFRS ACCOUNT CODE TRANS APPN PO" PROJECT SUB PROJ OR. CO. OBJ SUB AnOUNT CODE FUND IN DE INDE PROJ PHAS INDE OBJ x X x L-1- IN CONSIDERATION OF THE GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CONTRACT, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. AI! rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be subject to and governed by those General Terms and Conditions contained in the text of this contract instrument and Section XVII. 'SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS." II. In the event of an incons!stency in this con.tract, unless otherwise provided herein, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence In the following order: (a) Applicable Federal & State Statutes & Regulations, (b) Special Terms and Conditions, and (c) General Terms and Conditions. III. This contract and its appendices, if any, contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. IV. This contract shall be subject to the written approval of the authorized representative of the DEPARTMENT and shall not be binding until so approved. Only the authorized representative by writing (delegation to be made prior to action) shall have the expressed, implied, or apparent authority to alter, amend, modify, or waive any clause or condilion of this contract. Furthermore, any alteration, amendment, modification, or waiver of any clause or condition of this conlract is nol effective or binding unless made in writing and signed by the authorized represenlative. V. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE: A. Authority The Legislature enacted Chapter 43.220 RCW which created the Washington Conservation Corps, hereinafter referred to as the "WCC," and named the DEPARTMENT as one of six state agencies having implementation authority. B. Purpose The purpose of this contract is to establish a formal understanding between the DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR to accomplish the project described in Section 7. "SCOPE OF WORK." This contracl is designed to specify the kinds and amounts of goods and services to be used and/or exchanged by the DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR to their mutual benefit through a WCC project. The SPONSOR acknowledges that participation in the WCC program shall not result in the displacement of currently employed workers, including partial displacement such as reduction in hours of nonovertime work, wages, or other employment benefits, nor in the impairment of existing contracts for services. VI. DEFINITIONS: A. "SPONSOR Contact" shall mean the person who serves as the SPONSOR's lead on the project and shall cooperale with all parties concerned to promote successful completion of the project described in Section 7. 'SCOPE OF WORK.' B. "SPONSOR Work Direclor" shall mean Ihe person who specifies work 10 be performed onsile; outlines, describes, and delegates work to be accomplished; supplies necessary orientalion and training for use of special equipmenl and procedures; and is responsible for directing WCC crew supervisor(s) regarding specific project tasks as described in Section 7. "SCOPE OF WORK." C. "DEPARTMENT Project Leader' shall mean the person who is responsibie for developing and facililating the project and shall serve as liaison between the DEPARTMENT and SPONSOR. PROJECT LEADER assumes ultimate responsibility to ensure adequate coordination of the project. D. "Corps Member" shall mean an individual enrolled in the WCC program. Corps members shall not be considered regular state employees. Provisions of law relating to civil service, hours of work, rate of compensation, sick leave, unemployment compensation, stale retirement plans. and vacation leave do nol apply to the Corps members. However, medical aid and state industrial insurance will be provided by the DEPARTMENT for each Corps member. E. "Crew Supervisor" shall mean the person who is responsible for matters relating to personnel administration and overall project direction. He/she supervises Corps members (generally four or more) regarding work to be accomplished and is responsible for individual crew safety, daily crew supervision and discipline, completes Corps member training plans, and provides a written evaluation of each Corps member's job performance and skills acquired after two months and at termination of employment. VII. SCOPE OF WORK: Both parties agree to complete in a satisfaclory and proper manner the services described under the Section 7. "SCOPE OF WORK" of this contract, and to provide materials and supplies necessary to ensure satisfactory completion of the project, including any special equipment required by special work conditions, and to procure any necessary permils such as right of entry. The DEPARTMENT agrees to provide Corps members who will be used to complete said work. All equipment provided by either the DEPARTMENT or the SPONSOR shall be returned to the provider within fifteen (15) days after termination of this contract, unless otherwise specified in Section XVII. "SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS." C:3 VIII. PERFORMANCE: A. Time for Performance: Any work performed prior to the effective date of this SPONSOR CONTRACT, or continuing after the completion date of same, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing herein, will be in violation of this contract and will be at the SPONSOR's expense. B. Compliance With All Laws: The SPONSOR agrees 10 observe all federal and state laws, regulations, and policies affecting performance under this contract. C. Release of Information or Materials: The SPONSOR will not release any information or materials developed pursuant to this contracl without prior wrilten authority from the DEPARTMENT. D. Final Report Evaluation: Within 15 days after termination of this contract, the SPONSOR shali provide the DEPARTMENT with a wrilten evaluation of the project. At a minimum, the following shall be evaluated: 1. Benefit to Corps members 2. Environmental benefits 3. Department cooperation/coordination 4. Whether the overall goals and objectives of the project were obtained 5. Suggestions for program improvement 6. Revised estimates of alternate supplier cost and SPONSOR cosUdonation IX. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT: A. Termination bv SPONSOR for Cause: If the DEPARTMENT fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner ils obligations under this contract, or if DEPARTMENT shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, assurances, or stipulations of the contract, SPONSOR shall have the right to terminate this contract by giving wrilten notice specifying the effective termination date to the DEPARTMENT at least seven (7) days before such dale. 8. Termination by DEPARTMENT for Cause: If SPONSOR fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this contract, or if SPONSOR shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, assurances, or stipulations of the contract, DEPARTMENT shall have the righl to terminate Ihis contract oy giving wrilten notice specifying Ihe effective termination date to the SPONSOR at least seven (7) days before such date. C. Termination ov DEPARTMENT or SPONSOR for Convenience: Either Party may terminate this contract oy giving the other Party wrilten notice of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least ten (10) days Defore the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documenls and other materials as described above shall be delivered to DEPARTMENT for its review. After the review at the option of DEPARTMENT such documents or material or portions thereof shall become its property. D. Insufficient Fundinq: In the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the effective date of this contracl and prior to normal completion, eilher Party may terminate the contract under Section IX.C. "Termination by DEPARTMENT or SPONSOR for Convenience" clause, suoject to renegotiation under those new funding limitations and conditions. X. LIABILITY: A. When direct supervision is provided by the DEPARTMENT employed crew supervisor, the DEPARTMENT agrees that WCC members working under this contract are agents of the DEPARTMENT, and therefore the DEPARTMENT shall be liable for personal injury or property damage caused by WCC Corps member negligence. B. When direct supervision is provided by the SPONSOR, the SPONSOR agrees that WCC Corps members working under this contract are agents of the SPONSOR. C. To the extent that the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington permit, all parties to this contract shall be responsible for damage to persons or property resulting from Ihe negligence on the part of itself, its employees, its agenls, or its officers. None of the parties assume any responsibility to the other parties for the consequences of any act or omission of any person, firm, or corporation not a party to this conlract. XI. NON-DISCRIMINATION: The DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR agree to oe bound by all federal and state laws, regulations, and policies against discrimination and agree not to discriminate in employmenl, eilher direclly or indireclly, because of a person's age, sex, sexual orientalion, marital status, creed, color, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, menIal, or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualificalion. c-y XII. DISPUTES: Except as otherwise provided in this contract, when a bona fide dispute arises between the DEPARTMENT and the SPONSOR and it cannot be resolved, either party may request a dispute resolution with the DEPARTMENT. The parties agree that this dispute resolution process shall precede any action in a judicial tribunal. Either party's request for a dispute resolulion must: A. be in writing; B. state the disputed issues; C. state the relative positions of the parties; D. state the SPONSOR's name, address, and WCC Agreement number; E. be mailed to the DEPARTMENT or SPONSOR within thirty (30) days after the party could reasonably be expected to have knowledge of the issue(s) which are now in dispute. XIII. INVOICE VOUCHERS: Reimbursable expenditures under the terms and conditions of this contract shall in no event exceed the amount set forth herein. The SPONSOR shall reimburse the DEPARTMENT for services performed when submitted on a properly itemized voucher (Form A-19) in accordance with Section 9. "MAXIMUM BUDGET Reimbursement shall be made by the SPONSOR within thirty (30) days of receipt of said voucher. XIV. AMENDMENTS: Changes in the scope of this contract which cause an increase or decrease in Ihe cost of, or the time required for the performance of any part of the scope of work under, this contract, shall be accomplished by written amendment and executed by both parties prior to implementation. XV. SUBCONTRACTS: The SPONSOR shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this contract without obtaining prior written approval of the DEPARTMENTS PROJECT LEADER. XVI. RECORDS RETENTION: Both parties shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence of accounting procedures and practices which sufficiently and properly refiect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended in the performance of the SPONSOR CONTRACT These records shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review, or audit by duly authorized personnel for six years after the contract end date. XVII. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: Special terms and conditions of this contract contained in the box below ŒJ are not D are made a part of this contract (requires initials). I / I Department Sponsor XVII. ENTIRE CONTRACT: This document contains the entire and integrated contract between the parties, and no statement, promise, inducement or agreement made by the DEPARTMENT or its agents or employees that is not contained in this written contracl shall be valid or binding. No alteration, addition, or modificalion of any of the terms or conditions of this contracl shall be effective if nol in wriling and signed by the authorized represenlatives of the SPONSOR and the DEPARTMENT SIGNATURES: SPONSOR DEPARTMENT BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE: Field Operations Coordinator DATE: DATE: 4/15/03 Pre-Approved as 10 form by the Assistanl Attorney General Ecology Is an Equal Opportunity and Affinnallve action employe,- Fo' special accommodation needs. contact the Washington CDnse<vallDn CD'PS at (206) 407-6947. The TOO numbe, Is (206) 407-6006. ",. \.::5 MEETING DATE: May 20, 2003 ITEM# ~ W CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid and Mobilization Between the Cities of King County, University of Washington Police, and King County CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: x 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memo from Chief Anne Kirkpatrick to PRHS&PS regarding the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid and Mobilization Between the Cities of King County, University of Washington Police, and King County; The Inter10cal Agreement itself, and Addendum "A" King County Mutual Aid Response Protocols for Law Enforcement. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) has proposed legislation to establish a regional and state wide law enforcement mobilization plan. This plan is modeled after the Washington State Fire Services Resource Mobilization Plan and requires jurisdictions in each County to establish Interlocal agreements to participate in the plan. It is currently on Governor Locke's desk for signature. This cooperative Interlocal Agreement and Mutual Aid Response Protocols provide for law enforcement mutual aid and mobilization between cities in King County, University of Washington Police, and King County. Local police resources can be quickly overwhelmed in a severe emergency or terrorist attack. While police departments have had mutual aid agreements in place for several years, there has never been a statewide policy for mutual aid and subsequent cost recovery. The Washington State Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs has taken the lead on developing the Washington State Law Enforcement Mutual Aid/Mobilization Plan, hereinafter referred to as the Plan. The Emergency Management Division, State Military Department will use the Plan as the basis for mobilization of police service resources in Washington State in response to major law enforcement incidents or other critical events. It should provide the framework for developing legislation and funding resources when mobilization occurs. As policing becomes more complex and the demands on local police become greater, it has become imperative to develop and formalize a statewide plan for mutual aid and mobilization when local resources become overwhelmed. The United States government has also required in its "First Responder Initiative Grant Process" that local jurisdictions must have a plan for response, be participants in mutual aid agreements, and formulate a statewide mutual aid system. This proposed Plan would meet those requirements and enable the City of Federal Way to avail itself to those funds if needed. Start-ull Costs: No direct costs associated with the adoption of the Interlocal Agreement or participation in the regional and statewide mobilization plan. The City of Federal Way is the sole decision maker regarding what resources and/or assistance is provided under the Interlocal agreement and the Plan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On May 12,2003, the PRHS&PS Committee voted to Authorize the City Manager to enter into an Interloca1 Cooperative Agreement to Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid and Mobilization Between the Cities of King County, University of Washington Police, and King County, and forward to full Council for consideration at their May 20, 2003 meeting PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the InterlocaI Cooperative Agreement to Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid and Mobilization Between the Cities of King County, University of Washington Police, and King County. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 S.D City of Federal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY Date: May 5, 2003 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Anne E. Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police 0<: .;é Brian J~Wilson, D uty Chief of Police ¿ - David e nger Interiocal Coop rative Agreement to Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid and Mobilizatiou Between the aties of King County, University of Washington Police, and King County From: Via: Subject: INTRODUCTION: Attached are the following documents: I. Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid and Mobilization Between the Cities of King County, University of Washington Police, and King County. 2. Addendum "A" King County Mutual Aid Response Protocols for Law Enforcement. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (W ASPC) has proposed legislation to establish a regional and state wide law enforcement mobilization plan. This plan is modeled after the Washington State Fire Services Resource Mobilization Pian and requires jurisdictions in each County to establish inter10ca1 agreements to participate in the plan. It is currently on Governor Locke's desk for signature. This cooperative Interlocal Agreement and Mutual Aid Response Protocols provide for law enforcement mutual aid and mobilization between cities in King County, University of Washington Police, and King County. BACKGROUND: Local police resources can be quickly overwhelmed in a severe emergency or terrorist attack. While police departments have had mutual aid agreements in place for several years, there has never been a statewide policy for mutual aid and subsequent cost recovery. The Washington State Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs has taken the lead on developing the Washington State Law Enforcement Mutual Aid/Mobilization Plan, hereinafter referred to as the Plan. The Emergency Management Division, State Military Department will use the Plan as the basis for mobilization of police service resources in Washington State in response to major law enforcement incidents or other critical events. It should provide the ftamework for developing legislation and funding resources when mobilization occurs. 0-\ A5 policing becomes more complex and the demands on local police become greater, it has become imperative to develop and formalize a statewide plan for mutual aid and mobilization when local resources become overwhelmed. The United States government has also required in its "First Responder Initiative Grant Process" that local jurisdictions must have a plan for response, be participants in mutual aid agreements, and formulate a statewide mutual aid system. This proposed Plan would meet those requirements and enable the City of Federal Way to avail itself to those funds if needed. Start-no Costs: No direct costs associated with the adoption of the Interlocal Agreement or participation in the regional and statewide mobilization plan. The City of Federal Way is the sole decision maker regarding what resources and/or assistance is provided under the Inter1oca1 agreement and the Plan. Committee Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to enter into an Interlocal Coòperative Agreement to Provide Law Enforcement Mutual Aid and Mobilization Between the Cities of King County, University ofWaslrington Police, and King County. D""L- 2 DRAFT 57C;/ð? INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT MUTUAL AID AND MOBILIZATION BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KING COUNTY, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON POLICE, AND KING COUNTY 1. DATE OF AGREEMENT AND PARTIES. This agreement, dated the first day of June 2003 for reference purposes only, is entered into by the undersigned municipal corporations or towns organized or created under the laws of the State of Washington, the University of Washington Police Department, and the King County Sheriffs Office. 2. AUTHORITY FOR AGREEMENT. This Agreement is entered into as an inter10cal agreement pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act as codified in Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, specifically RCW 39.34.080. 3. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. Each party has the power, authority and responsibility to provide police protection for its citizens within its boundaries. On occasion, the demand for law enforcement services within a jurisdiction may exceed that department's ability to respond in a timely manner. When that occurs, the police department or departments of other jurisdictions may be capable of providing backup law enforcement services. In order to fulfill their respective obligations to their citizens, the parties desire to provide backup law enforcement services to each other under the terms and conditions set forth below. 4. MUTUAL AID LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES. Each party will to the best of its ability.-fumish mutual aid law enforcement services to, and at the request of, any other party whose police department is taxed beyond its ability to respond, and render law enforcement services in a timely manner. Each jurisdiction shall confer police authority on those police officers from other jurisdictions providing mutual aid law enforcement services and enforcing the requesting jurisdiction's ordinances. The mutual aid officers shall proceed at the direction of the requesting department's police chief or sheriff or their designee. The responding department maintains the discretion to determine whether its own police department will not or cannot provide the requested mutual aid services. The responding department also maintains the discretion to determine at any time during the response that it may stop providing assistance. Upon determining that it will not respond or that it will stop assisting, the department shall immediately notify the requesting department of the change in mutual aid law enforcement services provided. The responding department shall be the sole judge of its ability to respond or to remain, and assumes no liability for declining to respond or for leaving. 5. SERVICES INCLUDED. For purposes of this Agreement, mutual aid law enforcement services shall mean supplemental response to assist at least one officer ITom the primary agency. Such services will typically be of a first responder type of service such as patrol response. Response protocols for this Agreement are outlined in "Addendum A". 6. TERM. This Agreement shall be effective on June 1,2003 for one (I) year, regardless of the date of execution and shall be automatically renewed on May 31st of each successive year. Any party may terminate its participation in this Agreement by giving 60 days notice of termination to all participating parties hereto. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The parties acknowledge and agree that in the performance of this Agreement, they are acting as independent contractors and not as agents of each other. 8. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS. Each jurisdiction which is a party to this Agreement hereby agrees to accept liability for any act, error or omission of its own employees of whatever kind and nature and ITom whatever cause arising out of or connected with the performance of this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold the other jurisdictions and their employees harmless ITom any such liability, claim, or cause of action, including amounts arising out of the performance, by that jurisdiction's employees, of this Agreement. All liability for salaries, wages and other compensation oflaw enforcement officers shall be that of their respective employers. 9. GOVERNING BODY. This Agreement shall be administered by a joint board, which consists of the police chief of each named jurisdiction and the King County Sheriff. Administration of this Agreement includes, but is not limited to, (1) each participant identifying the resources available to aid participating jurisdictions; (2) review of the response protocols (Addendum A); and (3) participation in the Regional and/or State Mobilization efforts. A quorum of the membership is necessary for any modification of the mobilization plan. Meetings may be called upon the request of any 3 board members with 30 days minimum notice. 10. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement shall be signed in counterparts and, if so signed, shall be deemed one integrated agreement. 11. MODIFICATION. The parties may amend, modify, or supplement this Agreement only by written agreement executed by all the parties hereto. 12. MERGER AND ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and/or agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and constitutes the entire contract between the parties. Signature page immediately following INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT MUTUAL AID AND MOBILIZATION BETWEEN THE CITIES OF KING COUNTY, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON POLICE, AND KING COUNTY SIGNATURE PAGE CITY OF Algona CITY OF Auburn By: By: Date Date CITY OF Bellevue CITY OF Black Diamond By: By: Date Date CITY OF Bothell CITY OF Burien By: By: Date Date CITY OF Carnation CITY OF C1vde Hill By: By: Date Date CITY OF Covington CITY OF Des Moines By: By: Date Date CITY OF Duvall CITY OF Enumclaw By: By: Date Date CITY OF Federal Way CITY OF Issaquah By: By: Date Date CITY OF Kenmore CITY OF Kent By: By: Date Date CITY OF Kirkland CITY OF Lake Forest Park By: By: Date Date CITY OF Maple Valley CITY OF Medina By: By: Date Date CITY OF Mercer Island CITY OF Newcastle By: By: Date Date CITY OF Normandy Park CITY OF North Bend By: By: Date Date CITY OF Pacific CITY OF Redmond By: By: Date Date CITY OF Renton CITY OF Sarnmamish By: Date By: Date CITY OF By: Date CITY OF Shoreline By: Date CITY OF Tukwi1a By: Date CITY OF By: Date Port of Seattle By: T. M. Kimsey Date Chief of Police CITY OF SeaTac By: Date CITY OF Seattle By: Date CITY OF Snoqualmie By: Date CITY OF Woodinville By: Date County of King By: David G. Reichert Date King County Sheriff County of King - Airport Police By: Ron Griffin Date KC Airport Police Chief University of Washington Police By: Weldon Ihrig Date Executive Vice President ADDENDUM" A" KING COUNTY MUTUAL AID RESPONSE PROTOCOLS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT 1. Authority All parties to the King County Mutual Aid Agreement will ensure a process is established to commit manpower and resources. II. Request For Mutual Aid 1. In the event of major disorder or other law enforcement operation the first law enforcement resources to be used shall be those of the primarily responsible agency. In the event that such resources are inadequate to control the situation by the primarily responsible agency, or there is a need for a specialized unit, a request for mutual aid under this plan will be made directly to an assisting agency. Such requests for assistance shall, if possible, specify the number of police officers and types of equipment required, where and to whom such officers are to report, and where and to whom the equipment should be delivered. 2. Rendering assistance under the terms of this agreement shall not be mandatory, except that if assistance can't be rendered, the requestee should immediately inform the requestor if, for any reason, assistance can't be rendered. It is understood that consideration as to whether assistance can be provided or not must be determined by the requestee. 3. In the event of mobilization under this agreement, the primarily responsible agency shall assume incident command, unless the primarily responsible agency specifically requests that a different law enforcement agency fulfill this responsibility, or unless the scope of the problem is multi-jurisdictional, in which case a unified command shall be established. This shall include directing Arrests III. IV. the assignment of all personnel and equipment. The assignment of duties to officers of assisting agencies shall be made by the incident commander of the primary responsible agency unless that responsibility is delegated to a different law enforcement agency as indicated above. 4. The primary responsible agency shall have the responsibility of establishing a command post and notifying all assisting agencies at the earliest possible time of its location. The Incident Commander shall establish a-command post in such a manner as to provide an area suitable for the staging and directing of all resources. Arrest policies will be detennined by the Incident Commander in charge of the event. Transportation of prisoners to jail facilities will be coordinated by the Incident Commander. The primarily responsible agency will be responsible for providing supplies that are reasonably needed to sustain the responding officers in enforcing the law and maintaining order. Each agency will be responsible for any repairs and/or damages done to their own vehicles as a result of participation in mutual aid. Insurance No signatory shall be held liable to another signatory for damages, loss of equipment, injury to personnel, or payment of compensation arising as a result of assistance rendered under the tenns of this agreement. Commissions & Authority Full-time, paid, commissioned officers who are responding to any call for mutual aid shall be automatically commissioned by virtue of the mutual aid agreement, through the commissioning authority of the primarily responsible agency and, therefore, shall be empowered to. exercise the same police authority during the time of the mutual aid as though they were full-time commissioned officers of the primarily responsible agency. This provision shall apply whether the mutual aid request is of: (a) A fonnal nature between department heads; (b) A less fonna1 nature through agreemel}t of watch commanders or shift supervisors; or, ( c) When the officers of one jurisdiction cross jurisdiction boundaries to aid or assist the officers of another jurisdiction signatory to this agreement. If signatory agencies have reserve officers or part-time officers, in addition to full- time paid, commissioned officers, they shall nonnally be exempt ftom the automatic commissioning, except those reserve officers working under the 2 V. VI. immediate supervision of a full-time officer. Reserve or part-time officers may be extended automatic commissioning at the direction of the department head who requests mutual aid, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that such detennination should be worked out in advance among the heads of the signatory agencies. Command The underlying principle of mutual aid is that other agencies are serving as a resource to another agency's request. Therefore, the Chief of Police or hislher designee (Sergeant, Lieutenant, Captain, etc.) of the requesting agency maintains incident command and is aided by those resources sent in response to this request for aid. In the event that the emergency is of such a nature that it exceeds the individual jurisdictional boundaries, a unified command s,hall be established until the mutl.¡a! aid situation ceases to exist and operations return to nonnal boundaries. Whenever significant resources from other agencies must be mobilized and brought into a jurisdiction in order to resolve a given problem, even when the scope of the problem is such that it is physically contained within the boundaries of the specific single jurisdiction requesting mutual aid, it is expected that an appropriate incident command staff be developed and that the senior staff officers responsible for the mutual aid assets will fill roles within the inCident command structure. Successful mutual aid operations must be based upon professional respect and also upon acknowledgement of the fact that the Incident Commander in charge also is responsible and legally liable for his decisions and actions. It must also be borne in mind that those in charge of mutual aid assets are still fiee to accept or refuse to carry out requests requiring specific missions, which would utilize and exhaust the assets for which they are responsible. Control While the question of technical command and responsibility is one, which requires specific designation of an Incident Commander, the exercise of control over responding mutual aid units and combinations of units brings up an entirely different set of concerns. Wherever possible, the supervisor or staff officer in charge of a group of responding units fiom an assisting agency would report to the Incident Commander as liaison and be assigned to specific tasks or missions, for which he/she would use his own departmental personnel. NOTE: Because of the possibility that reserve officers will be used in many responses to requests for mutual aid, it is important to establish and record their presence and to verify the fact that they are certified reserves within the scope of the definition of the "Peace Officer Powers Act," and have met the requirements established by the Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission. Reserve officers should generally work under supervisors or regular officers fiom their own agencies, but under some circumstances (depending on the scope of the operation), might be configured into 3 VII. VIII. a special reserve contingent for handling special assignments such as roadblock, evacuation, fixed-point traffic control, etc. Press Relations It shall be the responsibility of the requesting agency in conjunction with the Incident Commander to establish a press area and to assign a public information officer to handle immediate inquires during any given incident. All releases of information through the public information function should be approved by the Incident Commander. Record Keeping It shall be the responsibility of the Incident Commander to establish a Planning and Intelligence Section. The Planning and Intelligence Section will keep an accurate log of what mutual aid agencies, personnel and vehicles are involved in the emergency, and during what periods, along with the assignments, which they were given and any actions, which they took. A formal written Incident Action Plan and After Action Report will be completed by the Planning and Intelligence Section and the requesting agency following the incident. The King County Chiefs Association through the Regional Operations Committee shall annually update and review plans and policies, and make recommendations for change. 4 MEETING DATE: .:Lð May/. 2003 ITEM# YI CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: SELECTION OF VOTING DELEGATES FOR 2003 A WC ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 0 CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION I:8J CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Bndgeted: Expenditnre Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: None SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Association of Washing,,'n Cities (A WC) has asked Council to select up to three city officials and/or city staff who will serve as voting delegates to represent the city at the 2003 A WC annual business meeting. Following the select;"n, the City Clerk is directed to advise A WC of the voting delegates. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a PROPOSED MOTION: "[move approval of _(delegate names) delegates at the 2003 A WC annual business meeting." ~I;~~~~~~~~~;;~~~~~:~ t¡vv\. . to serve as the city's voting ~._~ ~~ --~~.~,~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED ~ ~DEFEIUU"f)INO AemJN 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) . R-æS~OI!:JO fl o,.d0TJ3 Re~ Mœfj COUNCIL BILL # I ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION #