The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 08-05-2003 RegularCity of Federal Way City Council Meeting AGENDA COUNCILMEMBERS Jeanne Burbidge, Mayor Jack Dovey Eric Faison Mary Gates Linda Kochmar Dean McColgan Mike Park CITY MANAGER David H. Moseley Office of the City Clerk August 5, 2003 AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Regular Meeting August 5, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. (www. cityoffederalway, corn) II. III. IV. go ao PLEASE CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATIONS Swearing-In Ceremony/Police Officers Life Saving Award/Department of Public Safety Introduction of New Employees/City Manager Emerging Issues/City Manager CITIZEN COMMENT COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING. Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise inappropriate. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought before full Council for approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by a Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion. ao Minutes/July 15, 2003 Regular Meeting Vouchers Quarterly Financial Report/June 2003 Meadowlane One Final Plat - Resolution Interagency Agreement between State of Washington, Washington State Patrol and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety for Narcotics Canine Team Training Over please. VI. VII. VIII. go ao Memorandum of Understanding between Bellevue Police Department, Federal Way Department of Public Safety, Kirkland Police Department, Tacoma Police Department and Washington State Patrol to Provide Framework for Use of HGI Stinger-equipped Bait Vehicles Arts Commissioner Replacement/Unexpired Term Memorandum of Understanding/Federal Way's Festival Days Proposed Amendments to Countywide Planning Policies Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on Solid Waste Issues West Hylebos Creek Trail Feasibility Project Request for Street Vacation/Portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive - Resolution CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Cancellation of August 19, 2003 Regular Meeting Steel Lake Soccer Field Renovation/Bid Award INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE Council Bill #327/Amendments to Chapter 22 (Zoning) of the Federal Way Municipal Code to Address Regulations for Churches in Single Family Residential Zones (Amending Ordinance No. 03-443) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADDRESS REGULATIONS FOR CHURCHES IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES (AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 03-443). CITY COUNCIL REPORTS IX. X. CITY MANAGER REPORT EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) ADJOURNMENT ** THE COUNCIL MAYADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA ** THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW--FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LIBRARY" CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on July 15, 2003. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirements. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/o PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the draft meeting minutes from the July 15, 2003 regular meeting as presented." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances on/v) COUNCIl BILL # I s'r reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall July 15, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting Minutes CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Burbidge called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hour of 7:05 p.m. Councilmember present: Mayor Jeanne Burbidge, Deputy Mayor Dean McColgan, Councilmembers Jack Dovey, Eric Faison, Mary Gates, Linda Kochmar, and Mike Park. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and Deputy City Clerk Stephanie Courtney. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Dovey led the flag salute. City Manager David Moseley took a moment to recognize Management Services Director Iwen Wang. He noted the city received the Distinguished Budget Award from the Government Finance Officers Association for the tenth consecutive year for the city's budget and financing. He thanked Ms. Wang and her staff on this achievement. Ms. Wang thanked the City Manager and noted this award belongs to the Management Services department and city staff who worked on the budget document. III. PRESENTATIONS a. Introduction of New Employees/City Manager City Manager David Moseley announced there were no new employees to introduce tonight. b. Emerging Issues/City Manager City Manager David Moseley noted there were no emerging issues to discuss tonight. Federal I4Zay City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 15, 2003 - Page 2 of 5 IV. CITIZEN COMMENT Carrol Clemens, encouraged citizens to attend the Federal Way Symphony Garden Tour. CONSENT AGENDA mo do Minutes/July 1, 2003 Regular Meeting -Approved Council Bill #325/Code Amendment Changes to Business Park Use Zone Charts - Enactment Ordinance-Approved Ordinance #03-446 Council Bill #326/T-Mobile Franchise -Enactment Ordinance-Approved Ordinance #03-447 Amending Individual Petty Cash Fund Limits -Resolution-Approved Resolution #03-390 COUNCILMEMBER GATES MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge yes Kochmar yes Dovey yes McColgan yes Faison yes Park yes Gates yes VI. PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Burbidge read into the record the procedures to be followed for the Public Hearing and opened the hearing at 7:11 p.m. Adoption of 2004-2009 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) & Arterial Street Improvement Plan (ASIP) · Staff Report Public Works Department Senior Traffic Engineer Maryanne Zukowski gave a brief powerpoint presentation to Council on the 2004-2009 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) & Arterial Street Improvement Plan (ASIP). · Citizen Comment H. David Kaplan, spoke inquiring why the apparent renaming of the 312th Street/I-5 off ramp study to the I-5 to City Center Access Study. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 15, 2003 - Page 3 of 5 There were no further citizen comments. · City Council Deliberation Council discussed the proposed 2004-2009 Transportation Improvement Plan and Arterial Street Improvement Plan. Councilmember Kochmar commented on the I-5 access study to City Center project being moved up on the list of projects without any additional outside funding. Deputy Mayor McColgan also noted he would like to see other funding avenues researched for this study, through our state representatives. Councilmember Dovey stated he would support postponing this item on the TIP until the next budget cycle to look for alternative funding resources. Councilmember Gates noted this item had been discussed previously and has already been budgeted. Councilmember Faison agreed with Councilmember Gates, and noted this study should proceed as budgeted; he reminded Council traffic congestion is the citizen's number one concerns. Councilmember Park noted he supports the resolution, as these projects are long term investments to ease the congestion in the inherently difficult infrastructure in downtown Federal Way. Hearing no further comments, Mayor Burbidge closed the Public Hearing at 8:21 p.m. · City Council Adoption of 2004-2009 TIP & ASIP -Resolution- Approved Resolution #03-391 COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION AND ADOPT THE 2004-2009 TRANSPORTATION IMRPOVEMENT PLAN AND ARTERIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AND DIRECTING THE SAME BE FILED WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE THE 1-5 CITY CENTER ACCESS STUDY FROM THE 2003-2004 BUDGET TO THE 2005-2006 BUDGET WITH THE FUNDS BEING EARMARKED; DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN SECOND. The amendment failed 4-3 as follows: Burbidge no Kochmar yes Dovey yes McColgan yes Faison no Park no Gates no Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 15, 2003 - Page 4 of 5 The main motion passed 4-3 as follows: Burbidge yes Kochmar no Dovey no McColgan no Faison yes Park yes Gates yes VII. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Community Center DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN MOVED APPROVAL OF CELEBRATION PARK AS THE PREFERED SITE, WITH THE STEEL LAKE SITE AS OPTION #2 IN THE EVENT THE CELEBRATION PARK SITE ISN'T FEASIBLE; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as £ollows: Burbidge yes Kochmar yes Dovey yes McColgan yes Faison yes Park yes Gates yes VIII. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Gates gave a brief report on regional transportation issues and her attendance at upcoming regional meetings. Councilmember Kochmar reminded citizens of the Kiwanis Salmon Bake on July 25th at Steel Lake Park, and also reminded everyone of the Federal Way's Festival Days beginning August 22nd through' the 24th. Councilmember Park congratulated Ms. Wang and her staff on receiving another award for the city's finances. He also announced the next meeting of the Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee would be held July 22nd at 2:00 p.m. Councilmember Dovey highlighted a letter the Council received in praise of the Federal Way Police Department. He thanked Chief Kirkpatrick and her officers for representing the community so well. Councilmember Faison announced the next meeting of the Land Use/Transportation Committee has been canceled, so the next regular meeting would be held August 4th at 5:30 Deputy Mayor McColgan also thanked Ms. Wang and the Management Services staff; and Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes July 15, 2003 - Page 5 of 5 noted he was disappointed he had to miss the Red, White and Blues Festival this year! Mayor Burbidge reported on her attendance at various regional meetings and community events. She highlighted upcoming events in the community and in the performing arts, and noted she had a great time at the Red, White and Blues Festival. IX. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley asked Chief Kirkpatrick to give a brief report to Council regarding illegal fireworks. Chief Kirkpatrick reported there were 267 calls for service on July 4th between 4pm and 4am. Of those 267, 136 calls were fireworks related. There were 4 dedicated officers, who made 120 contacts. A total of 8 citations were made and thousands of dollars of illegal fireworks were confiscated. Mr. Moseley noted the city has closed on the Paragon building and are now the new owners. Council will have a Special Study Session on July 22nd at 3:00 p.m. to review with the consultant. He noted the end is in sight for Hwy 99 Phase I street construction. The project is ahead of schedule and should finish up mid-August. City Manager Moseley noted the city is currently working with a consultant as a part of the city's website redesign. He encouraged Council and citizens to complete the on-line survey with input. He further announced the Executive Session scheduled for tonight has been canceled. Xo EXECUTIVE SESSION ao Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110( 1 )(i) -CANCELED Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b) CANCELED ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Burbidge adjourned the regular meeting at 8:54 p.m. Stephanie Courtney Deputy City Clerk MEETING DATE: ,2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VOUCHERS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $3,072,750.12 $3,072,750.12 $ ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performe~d~ts described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Wa72.~W,~ll~hat ~ed to authenticate and certify said claims.__~9~/ CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24 PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of Vouchers. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 05/10/2001 COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CITY OF Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July 17, 2003 Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee Tho Kraus, Finance Manager David Moseley, City Manager Vouchers Action Requested: Accept the vouchers and forward to the Next Council meeting for approval. I I APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION: ~ v ~c~e~hair /~(~itt~ee Member Comfnittee Member k:\fin~acctspay\checkrun~fr cover, doc apChkLst 06~20~2003 1:36:t9PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173502 06/18/2003 007050 Voucher: 173502 173503 06/18/2003 003464 Voucher: 173503 173504 06/18/2003 000117 Voucher: 173504 173505 06/20/2003 007481 Voucher: 173505 173506 06/20/2003 007413 Voucher: 173506 173507 06~0/2003 007414 Voucher: 173507 173508 06/20/2003 007331 Voucher: 173508 173509 06/20/2003 007470 Voucher: 173509 173510 06/20/2003 007378 Voucher: 173510 173511 06~0/2003 005253 Voucher: 173511 173512 06/20/2003 005254 Voucher: 173512 LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIE MATTLE&MAR KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO926503-0010 GFOA-GOV'T FINANCE OFFI FELDMAN, CRAIG HAUGEN, JEFF JOHNSON, RUSSELL 1013210 CHG FUND 119806 119805 MAIL ADVERTISING BUREAU 31939 PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC. ROBERT W HAMILTON PS U S BANCORP U S BANCORP JUNE 19,2003 JAN 2003 MAY 2003 MAY 2003 05/15/2003 AG02-125:PUBLIC DEFENDE 02/05/2003 PWSCIP-022194869#66,JUN 06/18/2003 MSF-APPLICATION FEE:CAF 06/20/2003 PK-CHG FUND FOR FED WA 05/03/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 05/03/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 06/17/2003 CM-POSTAGE MAILING PER 06/20/2003 MS-PETTY CASH FUNDS (J 01/09/2003 AG03-61:CONFLICT PUBLIC I' 06/05/2003 CITY VISA CHARGES FOR (M 06/05/2003 PS-CITY VISA CHARGES FO 338.50 139,210.00 480.00 50.00 20.00 15.00 5,140.17 413.21 450.00 674.28 836.61 Sub total for us bank: 338.50 139,210.00 480.00 50.00 20.00 15.00 5,140.17 413.21 450.00 674.28 836.61 147,627.77 Page:l apChkLst 0612012003 1:36:19PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 11 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 147,627.77 Page: 2 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: I Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice 173513 06/23/2003 003464 Voucher: 173513 173514 06/23/2003 000061 Voucher: 173514 173515 06/23/2003 007238 Voucher: 173515 173516 06/23/2003 002024 Voucher: 173516 173517 06/24/2003 004149 Voucher: 173517 173518 06/27/2003 003464 Voucher: 173518 173519 06/30/2003 004628 Voucher: 173519 173520 06/30/2003 004258 Voucher: 173520 173521 06/30/2003 003291 Voucher: 173521 173522 06/30/2003 000332 Voucher: 173522 173523 06/30/2003 006397 Voucher: 173523 173524 06/30/2003 000109 Voucher: 173524 173525 06/30/2003 005266 Voucher: 173525 173526 06/30/2003 007377 Voucher: 173526 173527 06/30/2003 000475 Voucher: 173527 173528 06/30/2003 005567 Voucher: 173528 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO797820-50&60 WA STATE REVENUE DEPAR 601-223-5385 PETTY CASH: JURY FEES JUNE 2003 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES JUNE 2003 LMI OFFICE SUPPLY JEFF JOHNSO KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO797820 0005 WA STATE PATROL IDENTI WA STATE DEPT OF LICENS FELTNER, LINDA M ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I ACTION BUSINESS FURNITUF5302 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13272 13278 13276 ADVANCED SAFE'FY CONCEP 1186 AIR-FX 050603 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 280851 280750 ALBRECHT & COMPANY 634863 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 03/18/2003 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 06/19/2003 05/08/2003 06/26/2003 GRABOWSKI M 06/25/2003 GRABOWSKI M 06/25/2003 2082-1 06/23/2003 0061626-1 05/30/2003 864858 06/19/2003 03/27/2003 06/09/2003 06/13/2003 06/11/2003 06/04/2003 06/06/2003 05/20/2003 05/20/2003 05/28/2003 PWSCIP-DRAPER-ROWACQ- MSF-REMIT SALES/USE TAX MUNI COURT JURY FEES - J MSF~REIM WITNESS FUND P CDB - NOTARY SUPPLIES, J PWSCIP-02-2-19486-9 KNT# PS-REMIT FBIANSP FEES-GR PS-REMIT ALIEN FIREARM S AG03-60:DBC INTERPRETIV LAW-JUNE 03 MONTH SRV C MSCC-LEGAL MESSENGER PS-DELIVERY & INSTALLATI PKM-FACILITY LOCKSMITH S PKCITYHALL-LOCKSMITH SE PS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES MSHR-FLAGGING & TRAFFI MSRISK- REPAIR TO BIKE # PKCHB-ALRM MNTR SVC JU PKRCS-ALRM MNTR SVC J PS-VOLUNTEER SHIRTS~ 53,310.00 31,343.79 470.84 458.88 86.00 86,290.00 49.00 15.00 4,000.00 96.00 7.5O 4,978.14 336.78 307.20 146.54 720.00 377.93 103.00 59.74 1,068.06 Check Total 53,310.00 31,343.79 470.84 458.88 86.00 86,290.00 49.00 15.00 4,000.00 103.50 4,978.14 790.52 72O.OO 377.93 162.74 1,068.06 Page: 1 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173529 06/30/2003 005287 Voucher: 173529 173530 06/30/2003 001746 Voucher: 173530 173531 06/30/2003 003129 Voucher: 173531 173532 06/30/2003 005501 Voucher: 173532 173533 06/30~003 000190 Voucher: 173533 -.~173534 06/30/2003 007494 Voucher: 173534 x0173535 06/30/2003 007431 Voucher: 173535 173536 06/30/2003 007406 ..... Voucher: 173536 173537 06/30/2003 005715 Voucher: 173537 173538 06/30~003 001233 Voucher: 173538 173539 06/30/2003 000075 Voucher: 173539 173540 06/30~003 000075 Voucher: 173540 173541 06/30/2003 000575 Voucher: 173541 173542 06/30~003 005049 Voucher: 173542 173543 06/30~003 006583 Voucher: 173543 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6417 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS A96093 AMS LASER SUPPLY ANDREWS, AMY APA-AMERICAN PLANNING A 260336 341712 260592 342058 6/3/03 6/17/03 6/10/03 139938 APPLIED PROFESSIONAL SV 02-48843 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COU 002-12255 AQUAM AQUATIC SPECIALI 075265 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IM6163838F AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 2536610835 2536613748 26837633 20405718 0033654119 ATTORNEYS' INFORMATION E53957 AVR PRODUCTIONS SUMMER SD AVR PRODUCTIONS 7/4/03 Inv Date 06/01/2003 03/20/2003 05/21/2003 06/06/2003 06/19/2003 06/17/2003 06/03/2003 06/17/2003 06/10/2003 05/28/2003 06/12/2003 05/20/2003 05/28/2003 06/02/2003 06/01/2003 05/16/2003 06/12/2003 06/02/2003 05/28/2003 05/31/2003 06/11/2003 06/20/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 113.31 113.31 PWAD-APWA MEMBERSHIP F 1,045.00 1,045.00 MSDP-CREDIT APPLIED IN MSDP-PRINTER TONER~ MSDP-CREDIT APPLIED MSDP-PRINTER TONER~ MC-INTERPRETER SVCS MC-INTERPRETER SVCS MC-INTERPRETER SVCS CDPL - APA MEMBERSHIP R -491.56 704.86 -200.76 886.23 80.00 90.00 170.00 190.00 898.77 340.00 190.00 PWS-REFUND ROW PERMIT 1,000.00 1,000.00 PWA-TRAINING MANUAL FO 26.36 26.36 PRCS-AQ-CIRCULAR TUBES 663.00 663.00 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE JUNE' 1,188.39 1,188.39 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME~ MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME-MAY MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME- 21.32 49.21 26.00 940.63 34.91 70.53 966.63 34.91 LAW-JUNE 03 MEMBERSHIP 25.36 25.36 PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS AT 2,275.00 2,275.00 PRCS-SET UP SOUND SYST 1,900.00 1,900.00 Page: 2 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173544 06/30/2003 001604 Voucher: 173544 173545 06/30/2003 002386 Voucher: 173545 173546 06/30/2003 007479 Voucher: 173546 173547 06/30/2003 007327 Voucher: 173547 173548 06/30/2003 001630 Voucher: 173548 BALL, GIGI Y 6/6/03 6/17/03 6/10/03 BANHEGYI/PAWLAK, SUSAN6/18/03 BARKER RINKER SEACAT 4787 BBC DODGE INC ST3-133 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO I 302603 302488 294505 298693 2945O8 300190-01 300204-02 Inv Date 06/06~003 06/17~003 06/10~003 06/18~003 06/06~003 06/16/2003 05/23/2003 05/23/2003 05/23/2003 05/23/2003 05/23/2003 05/23/2003 05/23/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total MUNI COURT INTERPRETER MUNI COURT INTERPRETER MC-INTERPRETER MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 61.25 35.00 70.00 166.25 70.00 70.00 AG03-73::COM CTR PLNG & F 34,196.39 34,196.39 PS-VHC INTREPID #2B3HD46 15,907.58 15,907.58 PS- UNIFORM / ACCESSORIE PS- UNIFORM / ACCESSORIE PS- UNIFORM /ACCESSORIE PS- UNIFORM / ACCESSORIE PS- UNIFORM / ACCESSORIE PS- UNIFORM / ACCESSORIE PS- UNIFORM / ACCESSORIE 15.94 239.31 7.18 209.93 7.18 634.03 20.67 1,134.24 Page: 3 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173549 06/30/2003 000007 Voucher: 173549 173550 06/30/2003 007375 Voucher: 173550 173551 06/30/2003 000414 Voucher: 173551 173552 06/30/2003 000991 Voucher: 173552 173553 06/30/2003 003093 Voucher: 173553 173554 06/30/2003 002351 Voucher: 173554 173555 06/30/2003 005573 Voucher: 173555 173556 06/30/2003 007503 Voucher: 173556 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS BROWN AND CALDWELL 319158 018025 001441 036664 003225 319159 265213 016623 171240 0010660 302133 277012 0010659 359584 037227 327786 319157 398413 703816 616901 14-3111 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 6953 CASCADE COFFEE INC CASCADE COMPUTER MAIN 30325700 20334671 9070270 CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONC 15892 CDW GOVERNMENT INC IN47273 05/22/2003 05/01/2003 05/01/2003 05/02/2003 05/01/2003 05/22/2003 05/20/2003 05/01/2003 05/13/2003 05/01/2003 05/22/2003 05/20/2003 05/01/2003 05/28/2003 05/02/2003 05/23/2003 05/22/2003 05/30/2003 04/10/2003 04/04/2003 05/21/2003 06/18~003 04/30~003 06/16~003 06/10/2003 05~2/2003 05/30~003 CELY, JUNE 122798 06/10/2003 CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CITY OFFFICE SUPPLIES LAW-OFFICE SUPPLIES~ MSDP'OFFICE SUPPLIES~ AG03-12:PANTHER LAKE OP PKDBC-CATERING SVCS DA PKRLS-MTG COFFEE SUPPL MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP MSDP-PRINTER MAINT SWMCIP-CONCRETE FOR P MSDP/RR PHASE II HP8150 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 131.82 115.16 641.02 70.18 318.55 63.58 60.06 57.71 54.47 47.66 39.11 32.70 22.72 21.53 18.11 12.86 8.65 8.16 140.78 133.70 7,444.50 24.86 37.00 66.54 625.60 184.96 54.49 2.00 1,998.53 7,444.50 24.86 103.54 625.60 184.96 54.49 2.00 Page: 4 apChkLst 06/30/2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173557 06/30/2003 001481 Voucher: 173557 173558 06/30~003 005657 Voucher: 173558 173559 06/30/2003 000142 Voucher: 173559 173560 06/30/2003 004412 Voucher: 173560 173561 06/30/2003 006380 Voucher: 173561 173562 06/30/2003 003752 Voucher: 173562 173563 06/30/2003 007496 Voucher: 173563 173564 06/30/2003 000721 Voucher: 173564 173565 06/30/2003 000063 Voucher: 173565 173566 06/30/2003 003536 Voucher: 173566 173567 06/30/2003 007475 Voucher: 173567 173568 06/30/2003 000939 Voucher: 173568 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECO 3396865 3390474 AB0000710601 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK#2037 CK#2039 CK#2038 CK#2040 CK#2041 CK#2035 CK#2036 CITY OF TACOMNSURPLUS 5053-03 CITY OF VANCOUVER 94457 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA COOK, PAT T1222088 T1223289 T1219670 W1219994 T1218433 C2483R4689 CORLISS RESOURCES INC CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF 0029096 0029290 OO29097 0030103 43667534 CREATIVE OFFICE FURNISH DALTON PAVILIONS INC 03-60831 03-63242 7157 DANONE WATERS OF NORT 4628554-15 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 0~)/30/2003 04/28/2003 05/31/2003 AG02-70:WEST HYLEBOS C AG01-133E:S 288TH/MILITAR PS-AUTOTRACKXP MAY 200 14,495.27 14,488.85 45.00 06/04/2003 06/04/2003 06/04/2003 06/12/2003 06/18/2003 05/28/2003 05/28/2003 05/31/2003 PRCS-TRVL EXP:RFD&M CO PKA-TRVL EXP:RFD&M CON PRCS-TRVL EXP:RFS&M CO PS-TRVL EXP: LETC TRGN ( SWR-TRVL EXP:ASS O REY C PS-TRAVEL EXP:NAFTO TRN PS-TRAVEL EXP:NATL VOL C PS-SURPLUS MOTORCYCLE~ 233.00 233.00 163.00 114.00 88.00 468.25 918.52 789.55 06/06/2003 PS-EVOC INST COURSE FEE 700.00 06/11/2003 06/13/2003 06/05/2003 06/05/2003 06/03/2003 06/17/2003 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI PKM- MNT JANITORIAL SUPP MC-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES~ PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 122.15 49.91 91.35 77.41 59.89 150.00 06/03/2003 06/04/2003 06/03/2003 06/10/2003 05/31/2003 PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES SWMCIP-CONCRETE SUPPL PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES SWM-CRUSHED ROCK CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF 151.78 656.88 215.57 112.21 3,092.93 03/21/2003 06/13/2003 05/29/2003 CD/HS OFFICE CHAIR FOR D PKM-PANELS/BOOKSHELF/B PRCS-GAZEBO ~ DBC 358.99 149.27 7,428.00 05/30/2003 MC-WATER/CLR RNTL ACC 34.59 Check Total 28,984.12 45.00 2,217.77 789.55 700.00 400.71 150.00 1,136.44 3,092.93 508.26 7,428.00 34.59 Page:5 apChkLst 0613012003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173569 06/30/2003 007468 Voucher: 173569 173570 06/30/2003 003472 Voucher: 173570 173571 06/30/2003 005822 Voucher: 173571 173572 06/30/2003 000438 Voucher: 173572 173573 06/30/2003 006156 Voucher: 173573 173574 06/30~003 005341 Voucher: 173574 173575 06/30/2003 007488 Voucher: 173575 173576 06/30/2003 007455 Voucher: 173576 173577 06/30/2003 000570 Voucher: 173577 173578 06/30/2003 001879 Voucher: 173578 DAVENPORT MECHANICAL DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS I DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY CO DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J DESTINATION WIRELESS DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA DONG, CHOU DUWAMISH DIXIELAND JAZZ EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE EARTH TECH INC 3/27/03 122180 D03-062361 3685 3684 3681 10025 10021 6/13/03 6/16&6/17/03 6/6/03 6110~03 6/19/03 D CHOU 6162 (1026922 1026894 1027224 1O26884 1027202 1026924 1027100 1027217 1026890 1026804 1026921 1027214 53644-261896 03/27/2003 05/21/2003 05/30/2003 06/19/2003 06/18/2003 06/17/2003 06/12/2003 06/11/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 06/06/2003 06/10/2003 06/19/2003 06/26/2003 12/06/2002 05/28/2003 05/27/2003 06/12/2003 05/27/2003 06/11/2003 05/28/2003 06/05/2003 06/11/2003 05/27/2003 05/22/2003 05/28/2003 06/11/2003 05/02/2003 PS-DUCTWORK MODIFICA PS-RADIO REPAIR #811 PS-POLICE TRAINING:SETH MSF-LUNCH:FINANCIAL ANA CD-HUMAN SERVICES MGR I PKPL-FOOD SVS COMMUNIT PS-SUPPLIES:WIRELESS PH MSDP/PS NEXTEL HOLSTER MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE MSF-MILEAGE:TRAINING-DO PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS AT PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR REPAIR/PARTS SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR SUPPLIES/REPAIR PS- AUTO SUPPLIES/REPAIR AG02-20A:SURVEYING SVCS 375.36 172.94 895.00 45.36 66.45 123.18 30.00 101.99 90.00 200.00 80.00 180.00 280.00 55,44 350.00 276.98 163.96 150.87 107.80 91.49 522.50 70.79 394.97 40.65 18.49 364.06 607.88 5,689.94 375.36 172.94 895.00 234.99 131.99 830.00 55.44 350.00 2,810.44 5,689.94 Page:6 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173579 06/30/2003 004444 Voucher: 173579 173580 06/30/2003 000343 Voucher: 173580 173581 06/30/2003 005639 Voucher: 173581 173582 06/30/2003 001046 Voucher: 173582 173583 06/30/2003 000328 Voucher: 173583 173584 06/30~003 004840 Voucher: 173584 173585 06/30~003 001131 Voucher: 173585 173586 06/30/2003 004270 Voucher: 173586 173587 06/30~003 004302 Voucher: 173587 ECOLIGHTS NORTHWEST 9961 ELEPHANT CAR WASH MAY 2003 ELLINGTON, THOMAS MARK 6/23/03 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI6776022 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 0133015 0131780 0133016 0131779 102171 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR FEDERAL WAY MIRROR FEDERAL WAY NEWS 005303 OO5324 005323 005290 005322 004818 OO4833 004808 004666 004815 004824 004838 004813 004814 004826 004798 004803 004825 FWLAW Inv Date Description Amount Paid 04/28/2003 SWR-CLEANUP EVENT 350.00 726.44 75.00 21.76 05/31/2003 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE 06/24/2003 MC-PRO TEM JUDGE 05/24/2003 PS-CREDIT REPORTS MAY 2 06/15/2003 05/31/2003 06/15/2003 05/31/2003 06/03/2003 MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES (MA PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES ('JU MSFLT-FUEL FOR VEHICLES PS-MISC REPAIR/SUPPLIES 2,247.37 5,612.29 5,554.04 1,912.23 55.49 06/11/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/10/2003 05/16/2003 06/04/2003 06/11/2003 05/28/2003 03/22/2003 05/31/2003 06/07/2003 06/14/2003 05/31/2003 05/31/2003 06/07/2003 05/24/2003 05/28/2003 06/07/2003 06/05/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS CDPL- LEGAL NOTIFICATION CDPL- LEGAL NOTIFICATION CDPL- LEGAL NOTIFICATION MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS CDPL- LEGAL NOTIFICATION MSMIS-NEWSPAPER ADS~ MSMIS-NEWSPAPER ADS~ MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT PWSWM-NEWSPAPER ADS~ LAW-NEWSPAPER ADS~ MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS CDPL- LEGAL NOTIFICATION CDPL- LEGAL NOTIFICATION LAW-1YR NEWSPAPER SUB 165.24 32.59 32.59 231.52 115.65 119.52 149.40 92.96 89.64 73.04 73.04 73.04 66.40 59.76 59.76 39.84 146.08 166.00 26.00 Check Total 350.00 726.44 75.00 21.76 15,325.93 55.49 577.59 1,208.48 26.00 Page: 7 apChkLst 05/30/2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173588 06/30/2003 004690 Voucher: 173588 173589 06/30/2003 001593 Voucher: 173589 173590 06/30/2003 003291 Voucher: 173590 173591 06/30/2003 004910 Voucher: 173591 173592 06/30/2003 006635 Voucher: 173592 173593 06/30/2003 006723 Voucher: 173593 173594 06/30/2003 002664 Voucher: 173594 1~3595 06/30/2003 004366 Voucher: 173595 173596 06/30/2003 001669 Voucher: 173596 173597 06/30/2003 007404 Voucher: 173597 173598 06/30/2003 000923 Voucher: 173598 173599 06/30/2003 007490 Voucher: 173599 173600 06/30/2003 002574 Voucher: 173600 173601 06/30/2003 007469 Voucher: 173601 173602 06/30/2003 007482 Voucher: 173602 173603 06/30/2003 000671 Voucher: 173603 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION S FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC FELTNER, LINDA M FILETEX LLC FISHER, CAROL FLATRATEINFO QUICKINFO FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC FWPDMAY03 15993B 2082-2 03-1066 03-1078 03-1069 120203 1009943 48652 FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPAN27048 FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELM746431 FULLER, MICHELLE M FURNEY'S NURSERY INC GARVEY SCHUBERT BARER GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C. GRAY & OSBORNE INC GREENE, BEANNA H D FOWLER COMPANY 746429 744900 6/11/03 1-16475 01-48556 202038 03565.00-1 02-2-11448-2 11308122 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 05/31/2003 PS-LUNCH:OFFICER PATRO 06/03/2003 PS-VEHICLE TOWING SVC F 06/23/2003 AG03-60:DBC INTERPRETIV 05/23/2003 CDA - LASERPRINT COLORC, 06/09/2003 CDA - LASERPRINT COLORC, 05/29/2003 CDA - LASERPRINT COLORC, 05/16/2003 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D 05/27/2003 PS-ANNUAL FLATRATEINFO ~ 06/20/2003 AG03-47:FLEXIBLE PLAN SV 06/13/2003 PKM-WELDING SUPPLIES 06/18/2003 AG02-95A:LEGAL SERVICES( 06/18/2003 AG02-95A:LEGAL SERVICES ~ 05/29/2003 AG02-95A:LEGAL SERVICES ( 06/11/2003 MC-INTERPERTER SVC 06/16/2003 PKM-SHRUBBERY FOR POO 06/13/2003 MSF-REFUND BUSINESS LI 05/20/2003 AG99-143-LEGAL SVCS (SW 06/10/2003 AG03-56:51ST AVE SW STOR 05/29/2003 PS- 02-2-11448-2 SEA CITY V 06/12/2003 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 214.00 214.00 1,300.00 1,300.00 4,155.60 4,155.60 37.86 60.38 251.15 349.39 50.00 50.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 338.90 338.90 50.30 50.30 205.00 608.00 6,239.09 7,052.09 100.00 100.00 124.58 124.58 50.00 50.00 33.08 33.08 1,638.63 1,638.63 852.48 852.48 160.89 160.89 Page: 8 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173604 06/30/2003 007499 Voucher: 173604 173605 06/30/2003 007500 Voucher: 173605 173606 06/30/2003 007476 Voucher: 173606 173607 06/30/2003 003210 Voucher: 173607 173608 06/30/2003 005625 Voucher: 173608 173609 06/30/2003 001431 Voucher: 173609 173610 06/30/2003 000016 Voucher: 173610 173611 06/30/2003 002137 Voucher: 173611 173612 06/30/2003 003211 Voucher: 173612 173613 06/30/2003 005272 Voucher: 173613 173614 06/30/2003 006652 Voucher: 173614 173615 06/30/2003 003846 Voucher: 173615 173616 06/30/2003 007157 Voucher: 173616 173617 06/30/2003 005469 Voucher: 173617 173618 06/30/2003 003462 Voucher: 173618 173619 06/30/2003 005934 Voucher: 173619 173620 06/30/2003 004659 Voucher: 173620 HARDIN, HOLLY HARRY, SISI HOT SHOT TAP DANCERS HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC I/O SOLUTIONS LLC ICON MATERIALS INC IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INLAND FOUNDRY SALES, IN IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I 122917 122916 7~/03 5112 Cl1303A 235563 16288898 16284980 0348 0320 G500841 JAMS COSTUMES/DBA DANS¢501-034 JAZZ FOR YOUTH 20030876 JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES 13694 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATi0013879 JONES, KEVIN L 7/4/03 JUNKER, RYAN 6/10/03 K P TRANSLATION SERVICE 5/13-5/27/03 6/3/03 6/13-6/17/03 KAYE-SMITH BUSINESS GRA 468538 Inv Date 06/10/2003 06/10/2003 O6/2O/2O03 06/01/2003 06/20/2003 06/05/2003 06/11/2003 06/09/2003 05/27/2003 05/21/2003 05/31/2003 06/06/2003 06/20/2003 06/19/2003 04/16/2003 06/18/2003 06/10/2003 06/04/2003 06/04/2003 06/17/2003 06/16/2003 Description Amount Paid PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C PRCS-HOT SHOT TAP DANC AG03-34:GRANT WRITING S MSHR-PO RECRUIT TESTIN PKM-ASPHALT MATERIALS MSDP FAX MACHINES MAIN MSMD-COPIES MAINT (5/5 - 6 SWM-VANED GRATE SWM/PKM DRAIN COVERS & MSC-RECORDS STORAGE S PRCS-DANCE COSTUMES F PRCS-JAZZ FOR YOUTH 8/ PS-POLICE REID SEMINAR F AG02-136:PT ANNEXATION A PKRCS- D J MUSIC SERVICE PS-EXPENSE REIMBURSEME MC-TRANSLATION SERVICE MC-TRANSLATION SERVICE MC-TRANSLATION SERVICE MC-PRINTING FORMS 40.00 35.00 750.00 1,098.50 735.00 637.75 199.25 2,000.70 156.67 874.75 985.38 2,396.91 400.00 395.00 10,425.96 250.00 132.99 249.00 104.50 209.00 729.55 Check Total 40.00 35.00 750.00 1,098.50 735.00 637.75 2,199.95 1,031.42 985.38 2,396.91 400.00 395.00 10,425.96 250.00 132.99 562.50 729.55 Page: 9 apChkLst 06/30/2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 173621 06/30/2003 007491 Voucher: 173621 173622 06/30~003 000125 Voucher: 173622 173623 06/30~003 001898 Voucher: 173623 173624 06/30~003 005568 Voucher: 173624 173625 06/30~003 007477 Voucher: 173625 173626 06/30~003 000201 Voucher: 173626 173627 06/30~003 001456 Voucher: 173627 173628 06/30~003 003399 Voucher: 173628 173629 06/30~003 000096 Voucher: 173629 173630 06/30~003 007050 Voucher: 173630 173631 06/30~003 004533 Voucher: 173631 173632 06/30~003 000630 Voucher: 173632 KINCAID-THERIAULT, VICTOR03-42609 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV KING COUNTY FINANCE OFF 1246885 1246884 7330062 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM D1201788 201787 KINGBEES OF BAYOU 7/4/03 KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 515100068673 515100068742 515100068753 515100068633 515100068546 515100068665 515100068595 515100068587 162546 KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY 5/20-6/10/03 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIE 2906301 3200201 1014202 2592802 2781501 3278301 #15 LINKLETTER, MONTSERRAT 6/20/03 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC 65391 05/30~003 05/16~003 05/16/2003 05/30~003 06/12/2003 06/12/2003 06/20/2003 06/13~003 06/18/2003 06/19~003 06/11/2003 06/03~003 06/12/2003 06/06~003 06/05~003 06/11~003 06/10/2003 05/28/2003 06/18/2003 05/28/2003 05/28/2003 05/28/2003 06/13/2003 05/21/2003 06/20/2003 06/05/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO¢ PWT-DISC INVESTGATION T PVVTR-BSC SIGN/MARKINGS CD/HS LIQUOR EXCISE TAX ' PS-MATERIALS/SUPPLIES:5/ PKM-MATERIALS & SUPPLI PRCS-PERFORMERS FOR R PS-PRINTING SERVICES PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS SWM/CIP-PRINTING SERVIC PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS~ PWSWR-PRINTING SERVIC PS-PRINTING SERVICES- PA PS-PRINTING SERVICES PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS~ PS-SMART TRAFFIC STATIS MC- INTERPRETER SVC PKM-FAC/VVATER SVCS PWS-WATER SVCS~ PKM-FAC/WATER SVCS PKM-FAC/WATER SVCS PKM-FAC/WATER SVCS PWS-WATER SVCS~ AG02-125:PUBLIC DEFENDEF MC- INTERPRETER SERVICE PWS-MEDIUM BARK- 75.00 12,417.28 19,236.27 4,996.89 642.18 194.78 1,000.00 163.20 92.01 20.67 254.59 19.58 1,283.02 3.25 169.73 3,279.00 310.00 107.48 14.48 84.84 14.48 14.48 34.70 17,108.00 51.73 58.53 75.00 31,653.55 4,996.89 836.96 1,000.00 2,006.05 3,279.00 310.00 27O.46 17,108.00 51.73 58.53 Page: 10 apChkLst 05/3012003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173633 06/30/2003 007434 Voucher: 173633 173634 06/30/2003 003055 Voucher: 173634 173635 06/30/2003 000874 Voucher: 173635 173636 06/30/2003 005043 Voucher: 173636 173637 06/30/2003 004431 Voucher: 173637 173638 06/30~003 000960 Voucher: 173638 173639 06/30~003 007303 Voucher: 173639 173640 06/30~003 007501 Voucher: 173640 173641 06/30~003 001843 Voucher: 173641 173642 06/30~003 003352 Voucher: 173642 173643 06/30~003 001052 Voucher: 173643 173644 06/30~003 004426 Voucher: 173644 173645 06/30~003 007497 Voucher: 173645 173646 06/30~003 004445 Voucher: 173646 173647 06/30/2003 000089 Voucher: 173647 LRP PUBLICATIONS MAACO AUTO PAINTING & B MACHINERY COMPONENTS MACHINERY POWER & EQU MADRONA PLANNING DVLP MATTHEW BENDER & COMP MILLER, LEZLIE MORED, LARNIE MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE MOTOROLA INC NAPA AUTO PARTS NASRO-NATIONAL ASSOCIA NATIONAL LLEGO NATIONAL SAFETY INC NEWS TRIBUNE NC395508 25160 1110751 110774 G01894012 00002837 00002836 00002839 63771756 7927337001 6/10/03 122915 ,~899-JULY/03 898-J U LY/03 2681-JULY/03 896-JULY/03 897-JULY/03 13315488 702877 3321WA C2469R4711 0116048-1N 520476 462586 220280 Inv Date 02/15~003 06/02~003 06/13/2003 06/16/2003 04/01/2003 05/28~003 05~8/2003 05~8/2003 06/04~003 05/31~003 06/10~003 06/10~003 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 06/03/2003 06/18/2003 06/11~003 06~3/2003 05~30/2003 06/08~003 05/11~003 06/01~003 Description Amount Paid Check Total MSHR-NEWSLETTER SUBSC 228.85 228.85 PS-VEHICLE PAINTING SVC 694.68 694.68 MSFLT-RANSOME MOWER R MSFLT-RANSOME MOWER R PKM-EXCAVATOR RENTAL 600.39 817.68 1,418.07 879.10 879.10 SWMCIP-HYLEBOS SNR PL PWSCIP-WEYERHAEUSER S PWSCIP-SHURGARD SR PL LAW-WA SUPREME CT RPT MC-LAW RESOURCE PUBLI MC-INTERPRETER SVC 410.40 19.80 165.00 25.31 21.41 60.00 595.20 46.72 60.00 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 30.00 30.00 AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASES AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASES AG93-51:KLCC PARKING LO AG99-139A:MC BLDG LEASE,~ AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASES MSDP/PS MCS2000 ENHANC 3,106.00 13,334.60 499.41 6,646.00 4,571.40 13,321.04 28,157.41 13,321.04 PKM-FLEET REPAIR & MAIN 21.75 21.75 PS-POLICE SEMINAR SERVI 1,145.00 1,145.00 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 110.26 110.26 PKM-SAFETY GLASSES 81.53 81.53 MC-NWSP SUBSCRPTNS TH PWA-NEWSPAPER ADS/SU MSHR-JOB AD 5/5/03-6/1/03 138.00 138.00 1,742.28 2,018.28 Page:11 apChkLst 05/3012003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173648 06/30/2003 700190 Voucher: 173648 173649 06/30/2003 005493 Voucher: 173649 173650 06/30/2003 006200 Voucher: 173650 173651 06/30~003 003736 Voucher: 173651 173652 06/30/2003 005222 Voucher: 173652 173653 06/30/2003 003529 Voucher: 173653 173654 06/30/2003 005678 Voucher: 173654 173655 06/30/2003 003991 Voucher: 173655 173656 06/30/2003 000504 Voucher: 173656 173657 06/30/2003 000034 Voucher: 173657 173658 06/30/2003 000705 Voucher: 173658 173659 06/30/2003 007502 Voucher: 173659 173660 06/30~003 002545 Voucher: 173660 173661 06/30/2003 004644 Voucher: 173661 NORTHWEST CHURCH NORTHWEST EMBROIDERY NORTHWEST NEXUS INC 123330 23560 23655 23265 23467 23280 323/18306 NORTHWEST TOWING INC OAKSTONE WELLNESS PUB 7910 7947 7868 33776 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SE 77012-001 OKANOGAN COUNTY JAIL APRIL 2003 ONG, CUONG GW SUMMIT ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 023075 022797 022715 022904 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPAh505917732-01 OSBORNE INNOVATIVE PRO 0002087-1N OSTROM, GRACE 122918 PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC 81939 PACIFIC PLANTS INC 37922 37957 06~04/2O03 04/24/2003 04/30/2003 05/13/2003 04/24/2003 O4/24/2OO3 04/24/2003 06/05/2003 05/12/2003 05/12/2003 05/04/2003 06/24/2003 05/30/2003 04/30/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/11/2003 06/09/2003 06/13~2003 06/04/2003 06/11/2003 06/10/2003 06/04/2003 05/23/2003 05/29/2003 CD/HS RENTAL FOR VOLUN'r PS-UNIFORM POLICE CLOTH PS-UNIFORM POLICE CLOTH PS-UNIFORM POLICE CLOTH PS-UNIFORM POLICE CLOTH PS-UNIFORM POLICE CLOTH PS-UNIFORM POLICE CLOTH MSGAC-INTERNET SVC 5/5 PS-VEHICLE TOWING SVCS: PS-TOWING SERVICES #621 PS-VEHICLE TOWING SVCS: MSRM-TOP SAFETY NEWSLE PS-MEDICAL RESPIRATORY t PS-JAIL SERVICES APRIL 20 MIS-PER DIEM DINNER REIM PWST-MAI NTENANCE/REPAI PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI PWSWM-MAI NTENANCE/RE PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI PRCS-RW&B FESTIVAL GEN PKM-BALLFIELD EQUIPMENT PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C PKKFT-FAC HVAC SYSTEM S SWM-PLANTS FOR DECATU SWM-PLANTS FOR DECATU 275.00 23O.94 352.51 196.68 1,644.96 18.49 318.60 500.00 371.01 134.91 522.78 1,226.70 2,100.00 84.00 578.95 26.80 8.65 62.58 21.71 81.16 262.92 182.00 770.62 550.35 103.09 275.00 2,762.18 500.00 1,028.70 1,226.70 2,100.00 84.00 578.95 119.74 81.16 262.92 182.00 770.62 653.44 Page:12 apChkLst 05/30/2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173662 06/30/2003 004311 Voucher: 173662 173663 06/30/2003 007103 Voucher: 173663 173664 06/30/2003 001814 Voucher: 173664 173665 06/30/2003 003088 Voucher: 173665 173666 06/30/2003 005025 Voucher: 173666 173667 06/30/2003 007139 Voucher: 173667 173668 06/30/2003 001189 Voucher: 173668 173669 06/30/2003 002822 Voucher: 173669 173670 06/30/2003 006993 Voucher: 173670 173671 06/30/2003 003520 Voucher: 173671 173672 06/30/2003 001612 Voucher: 173672 173673 06/30/2003 007322 Voucher: 173673 173674 06/30/2003 000049 Voucher: 173674 173675 06/30/2003 004439 Voucher: 173675 PACIFIC RIM RESOURCES I PACIFIC SURVEY SUPPLY PARAMETRIX INC PART WORKS INC, THE NNYD-2003-02 99837 01-62277 111441 PCCl - PROFESSIONAL COMN21201 PETTIE, TONI AUDITING PETTY CASH - CM OFFICE CM 6/25/03 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CE DBC 6/23/03 PFX PET SUPPLY INC PHUNG, NOVA C POLLARD GROUP INC 327459 6/13/03 62357 POVERTY BAY COFFEE COM 5/28/03 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 589088 590799 PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & TA P24470 Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid 03/05/2003 SWR-NORTHWEST NATURA 04/07/2003 PS-REPR/MAINTENANCE:TO 06/03/2003 AG02-109:CHRISTIAN FAITH 06/12/2003 PKM-PLUMBING SUPPLIES 06/20/2003 AG00-51C:CHB JNTRL SVCS~ 03/18/2003 MSHR-EDUC ASSNTFFUITI 06/25/2003 MILEAGE REIMB FOR CATHE 06/23/2003 PKDBC-WEB IMAGE SOFTW/ 06/03/2003 PS-K-9 SUPPLIES/DOG FOOt: 06/13/2003 MC- INTERPRETER 06/18/2003 MSHR-BUSINESS CARDS 05/28/2003 PS-FOOD/BEVERAGE:SUPE 06/05/2003 AG03-37A-LEGAL SVCS:MUNI 06/20/2003 AG02-137:CLASS ACTION LA 06/09/2003 MSGAC-SHVS DECK REPAI 11,500.00 226.50 13,910.32 48.32 1,797.00 272.20 242.36 99.50 179.76 60.00 154.12 278.56 16,270.20 2,150.30 1,125.57 Check Total 11,500.00 226.50 13,910.32 48.32 1,797.00 272.20 242.36 99.50 179.76 60.00 154.12 278.56 18,420.50 1,125.57 Page: 13 apChkLst 05/30/2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: t4 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued} Invoice 173677 06/30/2003 000051 Voucher: 173677 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 131-066-1002 727-469-1000 109-922-1002 311-112-7001 250-275-5917 888-389-1007 918-041-1002 669-650-2001 722-288-1000 004-919-1000 536-673-1007 458-148-1001 487-650-2008 141-467-1006 250-275-0389 225-650-2002 330-694-9979 604-130-2008 112-722-1008 720-429-1004 373-087-1005 925-940-2007 525-940-2005 241-985-1007 904-388-1003 497-198-1008 420-530-2005 733-829-1003 733-930-2007 638-448-1005 183-469-1006 319~041-1003 738-448-1003 233-930-2008 177-437-1007 Inv Date 06/02/2003 06/18/2003 06/13/2003 06/18/2003 06/16/2003 06/17/2003 06/13/2003 06/16/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 06/02/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/17/2003 06/17/2003 06/17/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/17/2003 06/16/2003 06/13~2003 06/13/2003 06/13/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/13/2003 06/13/2003 06/02/2003 06/17/2003 06/13/2003 06/02/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 Description Amount Paid PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRCTY CH PKM- UTILITY CHARGES 5/ PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRCTY CH PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES MC-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 5 PKM- UTILITY CHARGES 5/ PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES 5/ SWM-ELECTRICITY CHRGS~ PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES 5/ PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES 11,788.40 1,606.80 1,112.12 676.83 428.86 327.23 310.14 299.71 299.22 269.29 246.06 219.53 209.28 189.21 176.91 157.32 153.45 145.55 138.51 124.33 122.21 120.73 115.09 112.34 106.70 103.17 96.44 93.01 92.59 83.53 78.49 65.08 62.65 56.62 53.09 Check Total Page:14 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173678 06/30/2003 000533 Voucher: 173678 173679 06/30/2003 005977 Voucher: 173679 173680 06/30/2003 004502 Voucher: 173680 173681 06~30~2003 003236 Voucher: 173681 173682 06/30/2003 006860 Voucher: 173682 173683 06/30/2003 000202 Voucher: 173683 173684 06/30/2003 004871 Voucher: 173684 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES 062-691-1002 504-368-1005 252-150-2001 886-203-1005 755-430-2005 917-259-1001 002-141-1004 352-691-1007 442-691-1006 359-540-2003 250-275-4910 177-159-1003 657-289-0009 102-141-1002 376-488-6325 17448 PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS I 31283 QC GRAPHICS INC 032705-FWP QFC CUSTOMER CHARGES- 420145 QUIGG BROS INC QWEST RAINIER INDUSTRIES, LTD. 206090 206095 253-946-9943 253-815-9920 253-661-9833 206-Z04-0609 253-874-3385 206-T02-8674 253-630-1529 206-T02-6518 74055A InV oa~e 06/16/2003 06/17/2003 06/17/2003 06/13/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 06/13/2003 06~02~2003 06/02/2003 06/16/2003 05/27/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 06/05/2003 06/10/2003 05/27/2003 05/13~2003 06/06/2003 05/22/2003 06/16/2003 06/04/2003 06/16/2003 06/04/2003 05/29/2003 06/16/2003 05/29/2003 06/16/2003 06/18/2003 Description Amount Paid PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PVVTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES 5/ PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES 5/ PWTR-UTILITY CHARGES PKM- UTILITY CHARGES 5/ PS-ELECTRICITY CHRS 5/16 PKM-BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 48.50 42.7O 41.88 39.76 39.48 37.37 35.7O 27.34 27.34 24.88 12.01 10.08 6.62 5.84 3,105.76 352.08 PS-BOTTLED WATER SVC 391.68 PS-REMOVE OLD CITY LOG 348.16 PS-FD&BEV FOR NWPAC TR 158.22 PWSWM- INBOUND ASPHA PWSWM-iNBOUND ASPHAL MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 6 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 6 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 6 MSTEL-PHONEJDATA SVC 6 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 5 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 6 MC-FAX MCHN CHRGS JUN C MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 6 PWS:SETUP FEE FOR ARTW 49.14 67.20 68.10 64.80 62.02 4,957.25 31.59 542.96 20.52 '442.92 19,877.76 Check Total 23,745.75 352.08 391.68 348.16 158.22 116.34 6,190.16 19,877.76 Page: 15 apChkLst 06/3012003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173685 06/30/2003 006873 Voucher: 173685 173686 06/30~003 007399 Voucher: 173686 173687 06/30/2003 005007 Voucher: 173687 173688 06/30/2003 004518 Voucher: 173688 173689 06/30~003 700320 Voucher: 173689 173690 06/30~003 007454 Vbucher: 173690 ~..~173691 06/30/2003 006241 Voucher: 173691 ~x~173692 06/30/2003007396 Voucher: 173692 173693 06/30/2003 007495 Voucher: 173693 173694 06/30/2003 004811 Voucher: 173694 173695 06/30~003 001213 Voucher: 173695 173696 06/30/2003 005539 Voucher: 173696 173697 06/30/2003 007440 Voucher: 173697 173698 06/30/2003 001988 Voucher: 173698 173699 06~30~2003 007429 Voucher: 173699 173700 06~30/2003 001480 Voucher: 173700 REGENCY CLEANERS 18432 RHODERDRON SPECIES FO MAY 5 G/S RIGHT SYSTEMS INC 66017 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATICCINGULAR WL VOICESTREAM T MOBILE RODGERS DEUTSCH & TUR 61 NGUYEN RONNINGEN-FENRICH LLC 02-05-03 SCHROEDER, JEANNE PS 6/19/03 SCO OPERATIONS INC SEACOR INTERNATIONAL IN 352251 352142 02-51705 SEATTLE STERLING MACK SECOMA FENCE INC CS72806 CS72621 3099 SEMISI-TUPOU, VAIVAO 6/10/03 SERON MFG CO 60870 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 529-1956 6O5/9679 612/7955 SHAE'S AUTO & CYCLE SERV6/05/03 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 2129-3 2128-5 Inv Date 05/01/2003 05/21/2003 06/19/2003 06/05/2003 06/05/2003 05/21/2003 06/10/2003 05/23/2003 06/19/2003 06/12/2003 06/10/2003 06/12/2003 06/06/2003 06/03/2003 06/12/2003 06/10/2003 06/09/2003 05/29/2003 06/05/2003 06/12/2003 06/05/2003 06/05/2003 06/05/2003 Description Amount Paid AG02-98:PS DRY CLNG SVC 3,196.26 205.50 4,309.98 PRCS-KC SENIOR CENTER S MSDP:COPS-MORE: CITRIX E AG00-74B: TELECOMMUNICA AG00-74B: TELECOMMUNICA AG00-74B: TELECOMMUNICA PWSCIP-STAT EVAL-NGUYE 1,686.75 2,944.50 4,906.50 750.00 PWA-ATC20 TRAINING SESS 800.00 PS-LUNCH:CJTC TRAINING: 134.91 MSDP/ALL-SCO ANNUAL MA MSDP/ALL-SCO ANNUAL MA PWS-REFUND ROW PERMIT 417.47 2,000.00 1,680.00 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKDBC-FENCE:BLUFF OVER 707.85 51.48 3,768.83 MC-INTERPRETER SERVICE 178.75 PRCS-FINGER WHISTLES F 28.33 PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC PKRLS-LINEN SERVICES AC PS- POLICE/EMERG LIGHTIN 18.81 20.84 18.81 2,562.60 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES CELE PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES CELB I 22.24 332.85 Check Total 3,196.26 205.50 4,3O9.98 9,537.75 750.00 800.00 134.91 2,417.47 1,680.00 759.33 3,768.83 178.75 28.33 58.46 2,562.60 355.09 Page: 16 apChkLst 0513012003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173701 06/30~003 002480 Voucher: 173701 173702 06/30~003 000056 Voucher: 173702 173703 06/30~003 007457 Voucher: 173703 173704 06/30~003 007471 Voucher: 173704 173705 06/30~003 000002 Voucher: 173705 173706 06/30/2003 007186 Voucher: 173706 173707 06/30~003 001618 Voucher: 173707 173708 06/30~003 003600 Voucher: 173708 173709 06/30~003 003233 Voucher: 173709 173710 06/30D003 002548 Voucher: 173710 173711 06/30/2003 003307 Voucher: 173711 173712 06/30/2003 005891 Voucher: 173712 173713 06/30~003 004356 Voucher: 173713 173714 06/30~003 007456 Voucher: 173714 173715 06/30~003 000341 Voucher: 173715 173716 06/30~003 002521 Voucher: 173716 SIGNAL EQUIPMENT INC 17394 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI29341 SONANDO (GROUP SUN) 7/23/03 SOUND PUBLISHING 6109 SOUND VIEW AUTO BODY I 1796 SPECIAL INTEREST AUTO WI~119456 SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW G SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES I SPORTS SERVICE SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL STERICYCLE INC SUDDEN IMAGE INC SUMPTER, KYLE SUNPAC ENTERTAINMENT SUNRISE SELF STORAGE SUPERLON PLASTICS INC 120040 119859 1052401 12341 1157320 132720 132560 132561 0002304439 2962 938832533 7/9/03 613319 6/03 613319 7/03 03F2785 06~04~2003 06/11/2003 06~20/2003 05/01/2003 05~07/2003 04/02/2003 05/28/2003 04/30/2003 06/13/2003 05/28/2003 05/30/2003 06/02/2003 06/02/2003 06/01/2003 05/31/2003 06/07/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 06/19/2003 06/27/2003 06/03/2003 PKKFT-ANNUAL FIRE ALARM MSC-PRINTING SERVICES PRCS-FRED HOADLEY, GRU PKKFT-AD:EVENT RESOURC LOSS DT 2/1/03 FILE #03-03 PS-TOWING SERVICES:POL PS-TOW SERVICE #621 MSRISK- TOW MOTORCYCL MSFLT-WlNDSHIELD REPAI AG03-24:RMS SERVER UPGR PS-POLICE FIREARMS SUPP PKM-ST LK PEST CONTROL ,~ PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES PS-PHOTO SERVICES PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS PE PS-MTHLY STRGE RENTAL F PS-MTHLY STRGE RENTAL F SWMCIP-2003 OVERLAY SU 674.56 148.64 1,000.00 2,100.00 799.46 145.52 50.50 145.52 289.81 11,726.00 70.44 89.22 92.48 272.00 10.96 772.48 569.78 1,000.00 170.00 170.00 132.27 674.56 148.64 1,000.00 2,100.00 799.46 341.54 289.81 11,726.00 70.44 453.70 10.96 772.48 569.78 1,000.00 340.00 132.27 Page: 17 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 173717 06/30/2003 007472 Voucher: 173717 173718 06/30~003 003085 Voucher: 173718 173719 06/30~003 007458 Voucher: 173719 173720 06/30~003 005344 Voucher: 173720 173721 06/30/2003 007480 Voucher: 173721 173722 06/30/2003 007478 Voucher: 173722 173723 06/30/2003 007492 Voucher: 173723 173724 06/30D003 005321 Voucher: 173724 173725 06/30~003 005425 Voucher: 173725 173726 06/30~003 001100 Voucher: 173726 173727 06/30/2003 005870 Voucher: 173727 173728 06/30/2003 003204 Voucher: 173728 173729 06/30~003 002426 Voucher: 173729 173730 06/30~003 003837 Voucher: 173730 173731 06/30/2003 000769 Voucher: 173731 173732 06/30~003 005019 Voucher: 173732 173733 06/30~003 001805 Voucher: 173733 SWEPT CLEAN 321226 06~30~2003 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION 2061743 2052748 THE CUTTERS 7/30/03 THE FRAUSE GROUP INC THE MACHINE 0303-1643 0503-1729 0403-1684 7/4/03 TIM CASEY & THE BLUES CA17/4/03 TOBOLSKI, PHILLIP J 03-42796 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 0095637 05/06/2003 04/04/2003 03/08~003 03/31~003 05/30~003 04/30~003 06/23~003 06/20/2003 06/16/2003 06/06/2003 TRACY, DAVID D TRACY 06/10/2003 TRANSPO GROUP INC 5023 5024 TRIVIA 7/16/03 TRUCKERS SUPPLY INC 987919 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 29252 30107 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 000F6588V233 000F80F48233 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO I 5854866 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE 33611255-001 33674899-001 VADIS NORTHWEST 00013197 06/09/2003 06/09/2003 03/08/2003 05/29/2003 06/02/2003 06/06/2003 06/07/2003 06/07/2003 06/09/2003 06/06/2003 06/10/2003 05/30/2003 PRCS-ARTIST FOR RW&B E MSDP:TOSHIBA DVD ROM MSDP - 40GB ULTRA ATA-10 PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS CO AG03-74:NATURAL YARD CA AG03-74:NATURAL YARD CA AG03-74:NATURAL YARD CA PRCS-RW&B PERFORMER 7 PRCS-TIM CASEY-PERFRM ~ PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(: PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES MC:LODGING JUDICAL SPR (: AG01-74A-WEYERHAEUSER I AG01-74A-WEYERHAEUSER I PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS 7 PS-REPAIR SUPPLIES #907 B PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE PKRCS-YOUTH COMMISSIO PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S PKM-DISTRIBUTION TUBE SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL AG00-2B:LITTER CONTROL S 125.00 50.05 680.00 400.OO 243.75 930.23 1,052.14 2,000.00 1,000.00 75.00 120.37 160.50 24,852.18 10,844.80 500.00 30.25 117.02 6.56 36.79 5.00 2.42 16.32 14.68 4,101.42 125.00 730.05 40O.O0 2,226.12 2,000.00 1,000.00 75.00 120.37 160.50 35,696.98 500.00 30.25 123.58 41.79 2.42 31.00 4,101.42 Page: 18 apChkLst 05130/2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173734 06/30/2003 003563 Voucher: 173734 173735 06/30/2003 005599 Voucher: 173735 173736 06/30/2003 001124 Voucher: 173736 173737 06/30/2003 006278 Voucher: 173737 173738 06/30/2003 007460 Voucher: 173738 173739 06/30/2003 000094 Voucher: 173739 -~ 173740 06/30/2003 003528 Voucher: 173740 173741 06/30/2003 004258 Voucher: 173741 173742 06/30/2003 000340 Voucher: 173742 173743 06/30/2003 000851 Voucher: 173743 173744 06/30/2003 004628 Voucher: 173744 173745 06/30/2003 000253 Voucher: 173745 173746 06/30/2003 005192 Voucher: 173746 173747 06/30/2003 007459 Voucher: 173747 173748 06/30/2003 000783 Voucher: 173748 173749 06/30/2003 005565 Voucher: 173749 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS C0001157 VAUSE, GREG VERIZON WIRELESS VISUAL EFFECTS WA SECURITY & SCHOOL R WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFI WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTI 4/14/03 1004-652615 12837 12787 12810 WSSROA 2003 AUDIT 2003-0188 WA STATE DEPT OF LICENS MAY 2003 WA STATE INFORMATION S WA STATE PATROL WA STATE PATROL IDENTI 200305O215 10303772 MAY 2003 WA STATE TRANSPORTATIO ATB30610158 ATB30610114 ATB30610230 WAHl, SANTOSH 6/24/03 WAITE, BRIAN CARL 399 WASTE MANAGEMENT 04/26/03 WELCOME COMMUNICATIO 2865 InV Date Descriotion 05/20/2003 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS 04/14/2003 PS- REIMB FOR STRETCHER 05/30/2003 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 06/17/2003 PS-FULL TINT ON WINDOWS 05/20/2003 PS- FULL TINT UNIT#524 06/04/2003 PS-FULL TINT #525 06/05/2003 PS-WSSROA CONF FEES J S 06/13/2003 MSF-AUDIT SVCS: MAY 2003 06/05/2003 PS-TOOLS/TECH FOR BEGIN 06/25/2003 PS-REMIT CPL FEES ('MAY 2 06/03/2003 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE MAY: 06/05/2003 MSHR-BACKGROUND CHEC 06/25/2003 PS-REMIT CPL (FINGERPRIN 06/10/2003 PW-PAC HWY S HOV LANES 06/10/2003 PW-PAC HWY S HOV LANES 06/10/2003 PW- S 288TH / SR99 TO MILl 06/24/2003 MC- INTERPRETER SVC 06/20~2002 PRCS-SUMMER SOUNDS CO 04/26/2003 GARGABE/RECYCLING SER 06/05/2003 MSDP - NOKIA 1260 CELLPH( Amount Paid 690.00 173.43 566.69 233.92 233.92 233.92 240.00 3,663.30 350.00 783.00 1,106.49 20.00 336.00 456.91 75.75 128.77 100.00 400.00 8,945.64 31.99 Check Total 690.00 173.43 566.69 701.76 240.O0 3,663.30 350.00 783.00 1,106.49 20.00 336.00 661.43 100.00 400.00 8,945.64 31.99 Page: 19 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173750 06/30/2003 003500 Voucher: 173750 173751 06/30/2003 005830 Voucher: 173751 173752 06/30/2003 001427 Voucher: 173752 173753 06/30/2003 700746 Voucher: 173753 173754 06/30/2003 701444 Voucher: 173754 173755 06/30/2003 001430 Voucher: 173755 173756 06/30/2003 005680 Voucher: 173756 173757 06/30/2003 005805 ? Voucher: 173757 173758 06/30/2003 007487 Voucher: 173758 173759 06/30/2003 007498 Voucher: 173759 173760 06/30/2003 000660 Voucher: 173760 173761 06/30/2003 000428 Voucher: 173761 173762 06/30/2003 000375 Voucher: 173762 173763 06/30/2003 004440 Voucher: 173763 173764 06/30/2003 005722 Voucher: 173764 173765 06/30/2003 007493 Voucher: 173765 WESCOM COMMUNICATIO WESTERN PACIFIC TELEPH WESTERN POWER & EQUIP WESTERN WASHINGTON C WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY WHITE CAP/BURKE WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL WILLIAMS OIL FILTER SVC C WILLIAMS, VICKIE WIND OF THE SPIRIT MINIS WOODWORTH & COMPANY I WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASS WSBA-WA STATE BAR ASSO WSLEFIA-WA STATE LAW E 13545 13549 13547 13548 258 334787 C2384R4686 02-50816 592573 2372 506672 03-01-091332 C2330R4688 156271 156504 2562 3200 D667SUPP YAKIMA 2003 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMEIMAY 2003 YOO, KYUNG W 03-42876 Inv Date 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/02/2003 06/11/2003 06/17/2003 06/16/2003 05/22/2003 05/31/2003 05/28/2003 12/27/2002 06/17/2003 06/10/2003 06/17/2003 06/06/2003 06/03/2003 06/04/2003 06/05/2003 06/04/2003 06/23/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST PKMT/INSTALLATION OF;~ MsFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS SWM-BRICK TRAILER CONC PS-FIRING RANGE FEE SVC MSFLT-VEHICLE SUPPLIES LOSS DT 12/27/02 FILE#03-0 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE SWMCIP-GENERAL CONTRA SWM-GENERAL CONTRACT PRCS-DAY CAMP STAFF--S PRCS-WRPA MEMBERSHIP I' LAW-SUPPLEMENTS TO RE PS-POLICE FIREARMS TRAI PS-JAIL SERVICES (5/03) AS I PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO( 277.44 87.04 87.04 87.04 538.56 4,799.83 4,799.83 134.16 134.16 150.00 150.00 500.00 500.00 93.06 93.06 41.88 41.88 20.60 20.60 1,000.00 1,000.00 107.47 107.47 379.43 152.35 531.78 312.00 100.00 412.00 298.11 298.11 180.00 180.00 25,989.60 25,989.60 75.00 75.00 Page: 20 apChkLst 06/30/2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 173766 06/30/2003 000947 Voucher: 173766 173767 06/30/2003 000694 Voucher: 173767 173768 06/30/2003 007417 Voucher: 173768 YOUR INC 2956 2958 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COM1:68759391 ZHAO, JINGLING 119810 06/20/2003 AG02-48:PS/JANITORIAL SV 06/20/2003 AG00-15C:MC JANITORIAL S 06/12/2003 PKM-FIRST AID SUPPLIES 05/08/2003 PKRCS-REFUND RENTAL DE 1,629.40 699.00 65.93 30.00 Sub total for us bank: 2,328.40 65.93 30.00 749,528.43 Page:21 apChkLst 06~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 255 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 749,528.43 Page: 22 apChkLst O6~30~2003 1:28:54PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Bank code: key . Check # Date 173676 06/30/2003 Page: 23 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice 173769 06/30/2003 002822 Voucher: 173769 173770 06/30/2003 005774 Voucher: 173770 173771 07/03/2003 001166 Voucher: 173771 173772 07/03/2003 003464 Voucher: 173772 173773 07/07/2003 003464 Voucher:~ 173773 173774 07/07/2003 700320 Voucher: 173774 173775 07/08~003 003464 Voucher: 173775 173776 07/10/2003 003464 Voucher: 173776 173777 07/10/2003 006204 Voucher: 173777 173778 07/11/2003 000302 Voucher: 173778 173779 07/15/2003 002263 Voucher: 173779 173780 07/15/2003 003182 Voucher: 173780 173781 07/15/2003 000083 Voucher: 173781 173782 07/15/2003 000332 Voucher: 173782 173783 07/15~003 004234 Voucher: 173783 173784 07/15~003 000664. Voucher: 173784 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CE JULY 4,2003 FINE ARTS SERVICE INC 017018 PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE KLCC 6/30/03 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO02-2-19486-9 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO02-2-19486-9 RODGERS DEUTSCH & TUR 212104 9037 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO926503 0020 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR CO332204-9119 TEELER, JENNIFER J TEELER KING COUNTY RECORDS&EL 263244 3-H MANAGEMENT & CONSUl.200371 AACE LOCKBOX 4666 03-100322 AARO INC DBA THE LOCK SH 32845 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0064404-1 0867854-1 0862391-1 ABT TOWING OF FEDERAL W7294 ACAP CHILD & FAMILY SE .RVI 1ST QTR 2003 1ST QTR 2003 Inv Date Description 06/30/2003 PKRCS-CASH FUND:RWBF ( 05/16/2003 PRCS-OUTDOOR MONUMEN' 06/30/2003 PRCS-FILM DEVELOPING FO 07/02/2003 PWSCI P-02-2-19486-9KNT#1 07/03/2003 PWSCI P-02-2-19486-9KNT~4 07/03/2003 PWSCI P-#43RELOCATION-FI 07/08/2003 PWSCIP-02-2-19486-9KNT#6 07/10/2003 PWSCIP-02-2-31009-5KNT, P 05/30/2003 CDHS-SUPPLIES FOR VOL D 07/10/2003 CD-RECORDING FEES 06/28/2003 MSGAC-CABLE FRANCHISE F 06/20/2003 CDB - AACE ANNUAL ASSOCI 06/24/2003 MSFLT-LOCKSMITH SVCS 06/30/2003 LAW-MONTHLY SRV. CHRG J 06/25/2003 LAW-MONTHLY SRV. CHRG J 06/13/2003 LAW-MONTHLY SRV. CHRG J 05/22/2003 PS-VEHICLE TOWING SERVI 04/07/2003 AGQ3-087: SUBSIDIZED CHI 04/07/2003 AG03-090: APPLE PARENTIN Amount Paid 1,500.00 17,408.00 244.26 25,883.47 226,810.00 20,000.00 48,110.00 11,380.00 151.24 26.00 1,487.50 60.00 19.98 96.00 20.00 5.00 252.96 2,500.00 1,250.00 Check Total 1,500.00 17,408.00 244.26 25,883.47 226,810.00 20,000.00 48,110.00 11,380.00 151.24 26.00 1,487.50 60.00 19.98 121.00 252.96 3,750.00 Page: 1 apChkLst 07/1512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173785 07/15/2003 001856 Voucher: 173785 173786 0~15/2003 000109 Voucher: 173786 173787 07/15~003 002899 Voucher: 173787 173788 07/15~003 001777 Voucher: 173788 173789 07/15~003 003428 Voucher: 173789 173790 07/15~003 000475 Voucher: 173790 173791 07/15/2003 007517 Voucher: 173791 ~173792 07/15/2003 005287 Voucher: 173792 173793 07/15~003 003645 Voucher: 173793 173794 07/15/2003 005501 Voucher: 173794 173795 0W15D003 002534 Voucher: 173795 173796 07/15/2003 005715 Voucher: 173796 173797 07/15D003 005718 Voucher: 173797 173798 07/15~003 006729 Voucher: 173798 173799 07/15~003 005822 Voucher: 173799 ACTION SERVICES CORPORa45780 45779 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13284 ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC 02003005.0-2 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIA 000609917 ADVANCED MATERIALS LAB 2549 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 286388 286387 286386 286450 ALEXAMILTON INTERIOR DE 3130 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6416 AMERICAN JANITORIAL SVC ANDREWS, AMY ARBORSCAN INC 2907 2906 2908 CA29506 CA29434 3366 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IM6163838G ARCHITECREATION INC CC-03-0263 ARGUS PACIFIC INC 0002560 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENS F03-177821 F03-158281 F03-176001CR F03-167971 Inv Date 07/10/2003 06/30/2003 06/27/2003 05/19/2003 06/10/2003 02/28/2003 06/20/2003 06/20/2003 06/20/2003 06/20/2003 06/18/2003 07/01/2003 07/06/2003 07/06/2003 07/10/2003 06/24/2003 07/01/2003 06/24/2003 07/02/2003 06~5/2003 06/11~003 06/06/2003 05/16/2003 06/05/2003 05~8/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total AG00-6C:SWEEPING SVCS ( AG00-6C:SWEEPING SVCS ( PKCITYHALL-LOCKSMITH SE 4,802.00 2,961.20 7,763.20 56.33 56.33 CM-WETLAND SURVEY ON Q 990.12 990.12 PRCS-100 INFANT/ADULT FA 498.90 498.9O PS-EQUIPMENT OC REFILL P 248.44 248.44 PKCP ALARM MNTR 7/01-9 PKCP ALARM MONITORING 7 PKKFT ALARM MNTR SERVI£ PKCHB ALARM MNTR SERV PRCS-FLOORING MATERIAL 120.00 120.00 60.00 103.00 403.00 4,614.38 4,614.38 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 112.81 112.81 AG00-50(A)-JANITORIAL SVC AG00-50(A)-JANITORIAL SVC AG00-50(A)-JANITORIAL SVC MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2938 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2972 TREE PRUNING: 151 SOUTH: 689.85 6,032.68 547.50 90.00 80.00 212.16 7,270.03 170.00 212.16 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE 7/3/ 1,223.86 1,223.86 PKM-CLATTER BRIDGE TRE 120.00 120.00 CM-PARAGON BLDG. AIR Q 1,376.26 1,376.26 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIES PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIES PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIES PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIES 487.10 309.99 -20.85 102.17 878.41 Page: 2 apChkLst 0711512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173800 07/15/2003 003090 Voucher: 173800 173801 07/15/2003 001186 Voucher: 173801 173802 07/15/2003 001233 Voucher: 173802 173803 07/15/2003 000787 Voucher: 173803 173804 07/15/2003 000004 Voucher: 173804 173805 07/15/2003 005351 Voucher: 173805 173806 07/15/2003 004128 Voucher: 173806 173807 07/15/2003 002386 Voucher: 173807 173808 07/15/2003 007467 Voucher: 173808 173809 07/15/2003 007528 Voucher: 173809 173810 07/15/2003 002645 Voucher: 173810 ARTCO CRAFTS 2684 ASSOC OF OREGON RECYCL3917 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE 253-661-3748 AUBURN YOUTH RESOURCE 1ST QTR 2003 AWC-ASSOC OF WASHINGT B & B AUTO PARTS 1876 1855 1902 1881 1862 1878 1340701 BAGNELL INC 5582 BANHEGYI / PAWLAK, SUSAN BEERY + ELSNER LLP CA27179 CA27179 531 BERGER, GAlL 124701 BIRTH TO THREE DEVELOPM 1ST QTR 2003 Inv Date DescriDtion 06/21/2003 PRCS-DAY CAMP ART SUPP 06/21/2003 SWR-AOR ANNUAL MEMBER 06/16/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 04/04/2003 AG03-123: TEEN DROP-IN C 05/23/2003 05/23/2003 05/27/2003 05/27/2003 05/23/2003 05/27/2003 06/19/2003 AWC JUNE CONF REGISTR AWC JUNE CONF REGISTR AWC JUNE CONF REGISTR AWC JUNE CONF REGISTR AWC JUNE CONF REGISTR AWC JUNE CONF REGISTR PKM-COMP TESTER 06/03/2003 PRCS-PRINTING SERVICES F 07/03/2003 06/25/2003 06/25/2OO3 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2717 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2717 AG03-65:PSA FOR LEGAL SV 06/23/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 04/15/2003 AG03-082: FAMILY SERVICE Amount Paid 97.77 150.00 67.79 3,750.00 306.00 253.00 253.00 240.00 306.00 240.00 30.45 1,195.42 70.00 35.00 2,341.90 72.00 5,250.00 Check Total 97.77 150.00 67.79 3,750.00 1,598.00 30.45 1,195.42 105.00 2,341.90 72.00 5,250.00 Page: 3 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173811 07/15/2003 001630 Voucher: 173811 173812 07/15/2003 004920 Voucher: 173812 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO I BOSTEC INC 291306 285505-03 296519-04 285505-02 297955-02 289112-01 306729 285505-01 302557 301463 296519-03 290234 297955-03 305713 305706 305711 300190-02 297957 305707 307185 299814 305217 306936 306429 302512 305705 306430 296519-02 300242 292679 298083 9942 9949 9950 Inv Date Description 04/25/2003 PS- 04/25/2003 PS- 05/28/2003 PS- 04/23/2003 PS- 06/04/2003 PS- 05/19/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 PS- 04/18/2003 PS- 05/23/2003 PS- 06/04/2003 PS- 05/23/2003 PS- 05/29/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 PS- 06/04/2003 PS- 04/28/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 PS- 05/30/2003 PS- 06/02/2003 PS- 06/10/2003 PS- 06/20/2003 PS- 05/28/2003 PS- 06/12/2003 06/18/2003 05/19/2003 05/16/2003 05/29/2003 04/29/2003 06/18/2003 06/20/2003 06/20/2003 UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. UNIFORM & ACCES. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. PS.DRUG TESTING EQP/SU PS-DRUG TESTING EQP/SU PS-DRUG TESTING EQP/SU Amount Paid 866.48 832.37 760.51 643.85 877.96 558.14 5.44 488.59 478.61 418.06 283.91 268.14 261.07 255.24 217.22 180.50 164.18 152.69 117.45 103.31 100.00 100.00 100.00 97.87 93.24 85.08 77.19 65.23 54.40 32.59 29.38 179,05 75.74 34.62 Check Total 8,768.70 289.41 Page: 4 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173813 07/15/2003 006680 Voucher: 173813 173814 07/15/2003 004315 Voucher: 173814 173815 07/15/2003 007519 Voucher: 173815 173816 07/15/2003 007525 Voucher: 173816 173817 07/15/2003 007526 Voucher: 173817 173818 07/15/2003 000414 Voucher: 173818 173819 07/15/2003 007531 Voucher: 173819 173820 07/15/2003 007523 Voucher: 173820 173821 07/15/2003 002351 Voucher: 173821 BOYLE, SHARON 6/25/O3 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP 005843 BUSINESS INTERNET SERVI 8462 BUTKO CONSTRUCTION INC 02-51265 BYERLY ELECTRIC INC 03-102675-00 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN CALDER, PATRICIA J 6998 6995 6996 6991 6988 6994 6990 6997 6986 6992 6971 6989 6993 6972 6922 6973 6937 6999 6987 03-42938 CALVARY CHAPEL FEDERAL ~02-51933 CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONC 15948 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 06/25/2003 PRCS-COSTUMES/SUPPLIE 359.84 726.14 6,500.00 4,719.00 345.63 06/23/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 06/16/2003 MIS-CITY WEB REDESIGN S~ 06/24/2003 PWS-REFUND ROW PERMIT 07/08/2003 CDB-REFUND ELEC PERMIT 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 06/30/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 06/24/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 06/24/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 06/11/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 06/24/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 06/13/2003 CM - CATERING SERVICES F 07/01/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 06/30/2003 DBC- CATERING SVC 07/07/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO¢ 1,211.62 1,047.20 879.30 841.32 800.94 799.48 656.52 571.20 526.68 514.84 424.50 1,271.60 285.60 47.25 272.85 170.00 142.96 81.60 57.80 75.00 06/25/2003 MSF-REFUND BUSINESS LI 50.00 06/13/2003 SWMCIP-CONCRETE SCHED 168.64 Check Total 35984 726.14 6,500.00 4,719.00 345.63 10,603.26 75.00 50.00 168.64 Page: 5 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descrii~tion Amount Paid Check Total 173822 07/15/2003 001003 Voucher: 173822 173823 07/15/2003 005573 Voucher: 173823 173824 07/15/2003 004359 Voucher: 173824 173825 07/15/2003 001481 Voucher: 173825 173826 07/15/2003 005712 Voucher: 173826 173827 07/15/2003 007368 Voucher: 173827 ,~173828 07/15/2003 007443 Voucher: 173828 173829 07/15/2003 000142 Voucher: 173829 173830 07/15/2003 002640 Voucher: 173830 173831 07/15/2003 003752 Voucher: 173831 173832 07/15/2003 001969 Voucher: 173832 173833 07/15/2003 007527 Voucher: 173833 173834 07/15/2003 002935 Voucher: 173834 173835 07/15/2003 002863 Voucher: 173835 173836 07/15/2003 007383 Voucher: 173836 CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SER 1ST QTR 2003 4TH QTR 2OO2 1ST QTR 2OO3 CDW GOVERNMENT INC IT70406 IS96738 CENTURY SQUARE SELF-S 4858 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3405178 3399180 CHANG, JENNY CA29951 CHIEF SUPPLY CORPORATIO256519 CITIES INSURANCE ASSO OF 0203-259 3763 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2044 CK# 2043 CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIO 16302 16377 COASTWlDE SUPPLY DBA T1229324-1 T1225358 T1229324 T1222457 t1227812 CODE PUBLISHING COMPAN 20236 CODECK CONSTRUCTION 03-102682-00 COMMISSION ON ACCREDIT 17178 COMPLETE COLLISION CEN 4057 COMPUTER DEDUCTIONS I FWPD316060 04/09/2003 01/17/2003 04/15/2003 07/02/2003 07/27/2003 06/15/2003 06/20/2003 06/16/2003 07/02/2003 06/17~2003 04/29/2003 06/17/2003 07/09/2003 07/02/2003 06/05/2003 06/20/2003 07/01/2003 06/19/2003 06/30/2003 06/12/2003 06/25/2003 06/03/2003 06/30/2003 06/24/2003 06/04/2003 06/16/2003 AG03-094: EMERGENCY ASS AG01-37B: AFTER HRS VCHR AG03-095: AFTER-HOURS V MSDP/PS HP/COMPAQ NOT MSDP - INET CISCO ROUTER PWSWR-STORAGE FEE 6 M AG02-70:WEST HYLEBOS C AG00-116E:PACIFIC HWY SO MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2995 PS-PATROL SUPPLIES:MK-4 { CITY INSURANCE-AUTO DEDUCTIBLE REIM-CITY OF PS-TRVL EXP:2003 IABTI COl' PS-TRVL EXP:HIGH RISK TR/ MSDP/PRKS-POINT OF SAL MSDP/PRKS-IMPLEMENTATI PRCS-KJP JANITORIAL SUP PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI PWD-FED WY CODE UPDAT CDB-REFUND BLDG PERMIT PS-CALEA REACCREDITATIC PS-VEHICLE REPAIR/PAINTI MSDP/PS RR ITRONIX IX260 1,719.00 577.92 449.35 1,560.43 1,127.04 577.50 15,879.28 12,933.88 35.00 821.51 164,426.00 250.00 204.00 54.00 1,750.00 1,000.00 513.45 544.61 215.85 57.75 122.15 544.00 52.80 4,590.00 777.85 48,528.96 2,746.27 2,687.47 577.50 28,813.16 35.00 821.51 164,676.00 258.00 2,750.00 1,453.81 544.00 52.80 4,590.00 777.85 48,528.96 Page: 6 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor ('Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173837 07/15/2003 000721 Voucher: 173837 173838 07/15/2003 007025 Voucher: 173838 173839 07/15/2003 003536 Voucher: 173839 173840 07/15/2003 000555 Voucher: 173840 173841 07/15/2003 000854 Voucher: 173841 173842 07/15/2003 000939 Voucher: 173842 173843 07/15D003 007397 Voucher: 173843 173844 07/15~003 701985 Voucher: 173844 173845 07/15/2003 003472 Voucher: 173845 173846 07/15/2003 000438 Voucher: 173846 173847 07/15/2003 007530 Voucher: 173847 173848 07/15/2003 003033 Voucher! 173848 173849 07/15D003 005341 Voucher: 173849 173850 07/15/2003 007277 Voucher: 173850 CORLISS RESOURCES INC COZEN O'CONNOR CREATIVE OFFICE FURNISH CRISIS CLINIC D J TROPHY DANONE WATERS OF NORT DAVID A CLARK ARCHITECT DAWN DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS I DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J DELTA KAPPA GAMMA DESIGN PLUS DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 0031767 0031768 0032892 364745 03-63660 1ST QTR 2003 00211384 00211318 3783-04-015 4628573-15 4628550-15 4629327-15 4629329-15 4628553-15 184R 190 183 1ST QTR 2003 223461 223460 3698 3692 C2123R4729 3030 CA29729 CA28255 34564 34543 34524 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 07/01/2003 06/23/2003 06/25/2003 04/29/2003 06/26/2003 06/18/2003 03/31/2003 05/30/2003 05/30/2003 05/30/2003 05/30/2003 05/30/2003 05/30/2003 06/11/2003 05/30/2O03 04/07/2003 06/18/2003 06/17/2003 06/30/2003 06/26/2003 07/03/2003 06/18/2003 07/01/2003 06/24/2003 06/17/2003 06/10/2003 06/05/2003 SWM-CRUSHED ROCK PWS-CONCRETE SUPPLIES SWM-CRUSHED ROCK AG02-114: LEGAL SERVICES PKCHB/OFFICE CHAIR;- AG03-076: TEEN LINK PROGF PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES CM-NAMES PLATES/PLAQU PKCHB-WTR/CL RNTL ACC PKCHB-WTR/CL RNTL ACC PKF-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT# PKRCS-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT MT-OF-WTR/CL RNTL ACCT PKRLS-WTR/CLR RNTL ACC CM-ARCHITECTURAL SVCS F CM-COMPLETION OF DUE D PRCS-PREL. DESIGN/CONST AG03-081: CONF DV & SHEL'[ PS-RADIO REPAIR #814 PS-RADIO REPAIRS/MAINT # PKADM-FOOD SERVICES- PS-LUNCH:STAFF MTG PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE PRCS-REMODEL EXISTING R MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2972 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2938 PS-AMMUNITION:FIREARMS' PS-AMMUNITION:FIREARMS' PS-AMMUNITION:FIREARMS' 73.09 311.44 22.49 835.66 814.91 750.00 837.81 31.57 199.11 156.02 6.53 58.97 44.82 6.74 30,000.00 10,000.00 1,049.18 4,250.00 394.02 366.81 87.98 38.31 150.00 5,137.48 90.00 70.00 1,280.00 550.00 750.00 407.02 835.66 814.91 750.00 869.38 472.19 41,049.18 4,250.00 760.83 126.29 150.00 5,137.48 160.00 2,580.00 Page: 7 apChkLst 07/1512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor 173851 07/15/2003 005620 Voucher: 173851 173852 07/15/2003 005399 Voucher: 173852 DUTTON PROMOTIONAL AD DYNA SYSTEMS (Continued) Invoice 19050 10595267 Inv Date Descril3tion 05/27/2003 CM - CUPS & PENS WITH NE 06/19/2003 PKM-ELECTRICAL/HARDWA Amount Paid 676.26 182.62 Check Total 676.26 182.62 Page: 8 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173854 07/15~003 000570 Voucher: 173854 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE(1027051 1027410 1026958 1027309 1027502 1027072 1027046 1026818 1027562 1027503 1027541 1027414 1027289 1027322 1027484 1027023 1027591 1026821 1027338 1026826 1027507 1027492 1027363 1027208 1027256 1027512 1026159 1027036 1027010 1027570 1027059 1027331 1027203 1027310 1027344 Inv Date 06/03/2003 06/19/2003 05/30/2003 06/14~2003 06/23/2003 06/04/2003 06/03/2003 05/22/2003 06~25~2003 06/23/2003 06/25/2003 06/19/2003 06/14/2003 06/16~2003 06/23/2003 06/02/2003 06/27/2003 05/22/2003 0611612003 05/23/2003 06/24/2003 06/23/2003 06/17/2003 06/11/2003 06/13/2003 06/24/2003 04/23/2003 06/03/2003 06~02~2003 06~26/2003 06/04/2003 06/16~2003 06/11/2003 06/16~2003 06/17/2003 Description PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TI RES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES RE PAl R/TI RES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO'REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAI R/TIRES RE PAl R/TI RES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES REPAIR/TIRES Amount Paid 876.13 663.51 649.80- 634.98 597.99 573.86 565.55 562.42 523.32 478.48 451.10 395.11 392.49 390.21 390.21 294.74 292.02 283.52 272.32 164.50 146.01 73.00 1,355.51 62.01 13.32 54.38 32.62 31.54 30.44 27.73 22.29 22.20 20.12 18.49 18.49 Check Total Page: 9 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173855 07/15/2003 001879 Voucher: 173855 173856 07/15/2003 007133 Voucher: 173856 173857 07/15/2003 005639 Voucher: 173857 173858 07/15~003 004905 Voucher: 173858 173859 07/15/2003 007283 Voucher: 173859 173860 07/15/2003 004344 Voucher: 173860 173861 07/15/2003 002887 Voucher: 173861 173862 07/15/2003 006514 Voucher: 173862 173863 07/15/2003 007473 Voucher: 173863 173864 07/15/2003 003911 Voucher: 173864 173865 07/15/2003 001090 Voucher: 173865 173866 07/15/2003 001046 Voucher: 173866 173867 07/15/2003 000328 Voucher: 173867 EARTH TECH INC 1027346 1027374 1027532 1027560 53644-264593 ECO-PAN LLC 2003-1100 ELLINGTON, THOMAS MARK 7/2/03 ELSASSER, DENNIS 6/23-6/27/03 EMERALD AIRE INC EMERGENCY FEEDING PRO 44083 4408O 44172 43606-S 44173 44064 44171 1ST QTR 2OO3 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 90589645 ENGINEERING BUSINESS SY 15925 ENTERCOM COMMUNICATI 31147 ENTERTAINMENT FIREWORK203115 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIA JN-23151 JN-23151-1 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI6890647 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0134209 Inv Date 06/17/2003 06/18/2003 06/24/2003 06/25/2003 06/04/2003 06/20/2003 07/03/2003 07/01/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 04/11/2003 06/24/2003 06/02/2003 06/19~003 07/04/2003 06/10/2003 06/20/2003 06/24/2003 06/30/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES PS- AUTO REPAIR/TIRES AG02-20A:SURVEYING SVCS 18.49 18.49 18.49 18.49 11,454.37 3,921.00 3,921.00 SWM-CONCRETE RECLAIM 152.32 152.32 MC-PRO TERM JUDGE 7/2/03 40.00 40.00 PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI KLCC/REpAIR AIR;~ PK/CHB; REPAIR HAVAC;- KLAHANEE-HVAC SERVICE PKMT/HVAC REPAIR;- CITYHALL-HVAC SERVICES~ PKKLCC/REPAIR AIR;- MTN OFF-HVAC SERVICES~ AG03-089: EMERGENCY FEE 50.22 50.22 536.05 412.62 '351.42 303.55 653.89 269.28 109.89 1,950.00 2,636.70 1,950.00 MSDP-QMS PRINTER OPC B MSDP/GIS-POST WARRANT 2,734.56 2,062.85 2,734.56 2,062.85 PRCS-PROMOTIONAL SPOT~ 500.00 500.00 AG03-119-COMM FIREWRKS 15,000.00 15,000.00 PK/PL: ENVIRONMENTAL AU[ PKPL/UNDERGROUND STOR PS-CREDIT REPORTS JUNE 1,450.00 1,220.00 21.76 2,670.00 21.76 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 6/1 4,887.20 4,887.20 Page: 10 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173868 07/15/2003 004840 Voucher: 173868 173869 07/15/2003 001131 Voucher: 173869 173870 07/15~003 001748 Voucher: 173870 173871 07/15~003 001297 Voucher: 173871 173872 07/15~003 000217 Voucher: 173872 173873 07/15D003 002644 Voucher: 173873 173874 07/15D003 000652 Voucher: 173874 173875 07/15~003 004817 Voucher: 173875 173876 07/15D003 004270 Voucher: 173876 173877 07/15~003 005987 Voucher: 173877 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR EVERSON'S ECONO-VAC INC FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 102186 102187 102188 102189 102218 102213 102214 102219 005332 005393 022827 022930 022905 138-006 135-006 137-006 136-006 134-006 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-751-44547 4-703-12677 4-751-02371 4-751-02371 FEDERAL WAY BOYS & GIRL 1ST QTR 2003 FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY 1ST QTR 2003 FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY/1ST QTR 2003 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR FEDERAL WAY POOL 004768 004845 004844 004783 14342 14341 Inv Date Description 06/06/2003 06/06/2003 06/09/2003 06/09/2003 06/17/2003 06/16/2003 06/16/2003 06/17/2003 06/20/2003 06/25/2003 06/23/2003 06~30~2003 06/25/2003 06/15/2003 06/15/2003 06/15/2003 06/15/2003 06/15/2003 06/20/2003 05/09/2003 06/13/2003 06/13/2003 04/01/2003 PS- EQUIP/ACCESS PS- EQUIP/ACCESS PS- EQUIP/ACCESS PS- EQUIP/ACCESS PS- EQUIP/ACCESS PS- EQUIP/ACCESS PS-EQUIP/ACCESS PS- EQUIP/ACCESS MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS AG03-75:SWM INFRASTRUC'I AG03-75:SWM INFRASTRUC'I AG03-75:SWM INFRASTRUC'I AG01-52A:DBC LANDSCAPE AG01-59A:PKS LANDSCAPE AG01-59A:PKS LANDSCAPE AG01-59A:PKS LANDSCAPE AG01-59A:PKS LANDSCAPE PS & PWSWM- EXPRESS DEl PKPL- EXPRESS DELIVERY S PWSWM- EXPRESS DELIV PKPL- EXPRESS DELIVERY S AG03-120: OPERATING SUPP 04/18/2003 AG03-111: EMERGENCY SHE 04/08/2003 AG03-110: FUSION- 05/10/2003 06/18/2003 06/18/2003 05/17/2003 ~06/11/2003 05/12~003 PRCS-ADVERTISING FOR Y CDPL-LEGALS~ CDPL-LEGALS~ CD/HS CDBG LEGAL NOTICE PRCS-SPEClAL OLYMPICS S PRCS-SPEClAL OLYMPICS S Amount Paid 1,767.89 1,767.89 272.00 272.00 2,460.40 152.32 32.64 65.28 587.19 507.77 8,429.09 10,150.00 456.40 898.16 905.22 622.34 353.61 509.20 58.00 26.67 11.20 13.75 2,500.00 3,750.00 500.00 174.48 119.52 56.44 99.60 261.00 174.00 Check Total 6,790.42 1,094.96 19,035.49 3,288.53 109.62 2,500.00 3,750.00 500.00 45O.04 435.00 Page:11 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor 173878 07/15/2003 002332 Voucher: 173878 173879 07/15/2003 001893 Voucher: 173879 173880 07/15/2003 005213 Voucher: 173880 173881 07/15/2003 004910 Voucher: 173881 173882 07/15/2003 005857 Voucher: 173882 173883 07/15/2003 007524 Voucher: 173883 173884 07/15/2003 007532 Voucher: 173884 -~173885 07/15/2003 007484 Voucher: 173885 173886 07/15/2003 004520 Voucher: 173886 173887 07/15/2003 003831 Voucher: 173887 173888 07/15/2003 000671 Voucher: 173888 173889 07/15/2003 002590 Voucher: 173889 173890 07/15/2003 004839 Voucher: 173890 173891 07/15/2003 063841 Voucher: 173891 173892 07/15/2003 007533 Voucher: 173892 173893 07/15/2003 002477 Voucher: 173893 (Continued) Invoice FEDERAL WAY PRINTING 3421 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DiS SIF-JUN 2003 FIFE PRINTING 15365 FI LETEX LLC 03-1090 FOILMASTER DESIGNS 4645 GARCIA, TERESA 01-48674 GILPIN, MICHAEL A 03-42906 GLASOE-ARTIST, PAUL J. 5/28-8/1/03 GOS PRINTING CORPORATIO0-59684 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES 03-015 H D FOWLER COMPANY HACH COMPANY HARLAN FAIRBANKS CO LLC HEAD-QUARTERS PTS 11314739 11316055 11316582 3495994 3486899 C065207CR 68220 67974 7344 HENRY, JAMES S 03-42977 HOME DEPOT 3030986 9032343 6O21045 Inv Date Description 06/16/2003 07/14/2003 05~20/2003 07/01/2003 06/29/2003 06/25/2003 06/30/2003 05/28/2003 06/11/2003 06/30/2003 06/24/2003 06/26/2003 06/26/2003 06/25/2003 06/17/2003 06/24/2003 06/24/2003 06/13/2003 06/30/2003 07/07/2003 07/15/2003 06/27/2003 06/10/2003 PRCS-PRINTING SERVICES F MSF-REMIT IMPACT FEES F MC-PRINTING SERVICES CDA - FILE SYSTEM SERVICE PRCS-BARK IN THE PARK C MSF-REFUND BUSINESS LI PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO¢ PRCS-LOANED ART PS-PRINTING SERVICES~ PS-POLYGRAPH EXAMS JUL PWS-SUPPLIES & PARTS PKM-GD REPAIPJMAINT SUP PKM-ClP PARKS REPAIR/MN SWM-WATER QUALITY SUP SWM-WATER QUALITY LAB ~ SWM WATER QUALITY SUP PRCS-COTTON CANDY MAC PRCS-COTTON CANDY SUP AG01-109A: PKM SANITATIO PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO¢ SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC PKDBC-REPAIPJMAINTENAN PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL Amount Paid 434.33 68,874.00 618.96 41.00 87.04 25.00 75.00 100.00 103.51 125.00 62.44 464.30 53.14 43.99 195.85 -64.58 224.87 181.78 386.50 75.00 28.22 23.94 10.06 Check Total 434.33 68,874.00 618.96 41.00 87.04 25.00 75.00 100.00 103.51 125.00 579.88 175.26 406.65 386.50 75.00 62.22 Page: 12 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173894 07/15/2003 002898 Voucher: 173894 173895 07/15/2003 000105 Voucher: 173895 173896 07/15/2003 001431 Voucher: 173896 173897 07/15/2003 000016 Voucher: 173897 173898 07/15/2003 002137 Voucher: 173898 173899 0~15/2003 005691 Voucher: 173899 173900 07/15/2003 005757 Voucher: 173900 173901 07/15/2003 002562 Voucher: 173901 173902 0W15/2003 005231 Voucher: 173902 173903 07/15/2003 000223 Voucher: 173903 173904 07/15/2003 005978 Voucher: 173904 173905 07/15/2003 007241 Voucher: 173905 173906 07/15/2003 005656 Voucher: 173906 173907 07/15/2003 007157 Voucher: 173907 173908 07/15/2003 700194 Voucher: 173908 173909 07/15/2003 005934 Voucher: 173909 IACP 1572986 ICBO-INTERNATL CONFEREN0-69779012 ICON MATERIALS INC AG03-45#3 244864 244853 16081312 16081313 0510 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INLAND FOUNDRY SALES, IN INLAND PACIFIC STAMPS & 0470717 O469262 465134 INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY DVLF1ST QTR 2003 INTERSTATE BATTERIES INC 550890 lOS CAPITAL INC 59215610 ITE ITE 2003 JACKSON, LAURIE 6/19/03 JACO ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3391 JIM'S DETAIL SHOP 11068 F 11057 F JONES & STOKES ASSOClAT[0014237 K BAR J CONSTRUCTION 02-35338 K P TRANSLATION SERVICE CA25493 IA72263 Inv Date 06/10/2003 05/27/2003 06/30/2003 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 02/05/2003 02/05/2003 06/27/2003 07/03/2003 05/27/2003 02/18/2003 04/07/2O03 06/30/2003 06/27/2003 07/08/2003 06/19/2003 06/23/2003 06/27/2003 06/20/2003 05/09/2003 06/25/2003 06/24/2003 06/10/2003 DescriPtion Amount Paid PS-MEMBERSHIP DUES/SE CDB - IRC WORKBOOK STUD AG03-45-2003 ASPHALT OVE PVVS-STREET REPAIR MTN - PWS-STREET REPAIR MTN - MSMD-COPIES MAINT (1/5 - 2 MSDP FAX MACHINES MAIN SVVM/PKM DRAIN COVERS & PRCS-PREINKED INVOICE S CDB - FRONT COUNTER RU CDB - FRONT COUNTER RU AG03-079: PACT PROGRAM~ SWM-PC1270 BATTERIES MSMD-COPIER RENTAL 7/ PVVTR-ITE ANNUAL MTG. P PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI PWS-RECYCLE SVCS PS-DETAIL SVCS #625 PS-DETAIL SVCS #514 AG02-136:POTENTIAL ANNE~ PWS-REFUND ROW PERMIT MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2549 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 7226 100.00 46.14 716,910.99 944.83 906.09 1,887.58 195.99 470.02 114.32 141.25 44.21 750.00 104.22 2,689.79 1,725.00 55.46 60.00 139.99 139.00 14,294.50 1,000.00 104.50 64.50 Check Total 100.00 46.14 718,761.91 2,083.57 470.02 299.78 750.00 104.22 2,689.79 1,725.00 55.46 60.00 278.99 14,294.50 1,000.00 169.00 Page: 13 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descrilotion Amount Paid Check Total 173910 07/15/2003 002010 Voucher: 173910 173911 07/15/2003 004397 Voucher: 173911 173912 07/15/2003 007510 Voucher: 173912 173913 07/15/2003 000373 Voucher: !73913 173914 07/15/2003 001259 Voucher: 173914 173915 07/15/2003 000125 Voucher: 173915 173916 07/15/2003 005568 Voucher: 173916 173917 07/15/2003 000564 Voucher: 173917 173918 07/15/2003 003898 Voucher: 173918 173919 07/15/2003 000267 Voucher: 173919 173920 07/15/2003 000376 Voucher: 173920 173921 07/15/2003 000092 Voucher: 173921 173922 07/15/2003 000201 Voucher: 173922 KCM INC 139940 KDD & ASSOCIATES PLLC 33-1 33-1 KEY MECHANICAL OF WASH102-52156 KING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIA 7/03-6/04 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIM JUNE 2003 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI KING COUNTY PET LICENSE 1233608 1253015 1221177 1253014 KCLIA 2003 201789 201790 JUNE 2003 KING COUNTY RADIO KING COUNTY SHERIFF'S OF 302530 38623 WIRE 2003 KING COUNTY WATER & LAN WRIA9-107 KING COUNTY-METROPOLIT 33952 KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020 515100068893 515100068786 515100068892 515100068803 515100068764 515100068679 515100068713 06/09/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 06/27/2003 06/30/2003 07/08/2003 03/18/2003 06/17/2003 01/21/2003 06/17/2003 06/22/2003 06/12/2003 06/12/2003 07/08/2003 06/30/2003 06/24/2003 04~4/2003 06/15/2003 06/30/2003 07/03/2003 06/23/2003 07/03/2003 06/25/2003 06/20/2003 06/13/2003 06/17/2003 AG03-48:LAKOTA WETLAND I PW-EXPR:WALLGREENS,LN PW-EXPR:WALLGREENS,LN MSF-BUSINESS LICENSE RE LAW-KING COUNTY BAR DU MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM F PWT-DISC INVESTGATION T PWT-DISC INVESTGATION T PWT-DISC INVESTGATION T PWTR-BSC SIGN/MARKINGS PKMT/IMPROVEMENT ASSEE PWS-MATERIALS/SUPPLIES I PWS-MATERIALS/SU PPLIES I MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES R MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES ~ MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES ~ PS-KING COUNTY SPEClALI SWM -WRIA NO.9 2ND TRIM AG02-132:CTR ACT IMPLMT PRCS- PRINTING/COPYING PRCS- PRINTING/COPYING PRCS- PRINTING/COPYING CDPL - COMP PLAN FOR ST PRCS- PRINTING/COPYING PRCS- PRINTING/COPYING PRCS- PRINTING/COPYING 14,825.29 474.25 323.99 50.00 240.00 1,369.66 12,205.97 10,272.77 6,919.79 27,066.15 310.40 450.33 444.68 634.00 4,370.00 76.38 638.00 3,368.67 6,016.25 254.05 212.16 434.29 155.58 21.87 119.95 106.08 14,825.29 798.24 50.00 240.00 1,369.66 56,775.08 895.01 634.00 4,446.38 638.00 3,368.67 6,016.25 1,303.98 Page:14 apChkLst 0711512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173923 07/15/2003 000201 Voucher: 173923 173924 07/15/2003 005773 Voucher: 173924 173925 07/15/2003 004298 Voucher: 173925 173926 07/15/2003 003399 Voucher: 173926 173927 07/15/2003 007529 Voucher: 173927 173928 07/15/2003 000096 Voucher: 173928 173929 07/15D003 001939 Voucher: 173929 173930 07/15~003 004052 Voucher: 173930 173931 07/15~003 007483 Voucher: 173931 KINKO'S INC, ACCOUNT #020 515100068773 515100068868 515100068887 515100068839 KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOClA 1ST QTR 2003 KOSOFF-ROACH, MELANIE E 2003 SPRING KVASNYUK, NIKOLAY IA47698 KWON, PETER 125372 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP LAW OFFICE OF KRISTA C W 822402 888002 460602 899802 2814401 3088801 824102 888103 101 2984001 896402 3266301 3266301 2049903 2832301 3033601 0014143 0014118 06070305 05010306 06070304 CA26423FW 06/21/2003 06/30/2003 07/02/2003 06/27/2003 04/17/2003 07/03/2003 06/19/2003 O6/27/2003 06/18~2003 06/18/2003 06/13/2003 06/18/2003 06/18/2003 06/18~2003 06/18/2003 06/18/2003 06/18~2003 06/10~2003 06/18/2003 03/12/2002 05~09~2002 06/13/2003 06/10/2003 06/23/2003 06~30~2003 06/29/2003 05/30/2003 04/12~2003 0513012003 06/06/2003 MSF-PRINTING SERVICES C PS-PRINTING SERVICES PS-PRINTING SERVICES LAW-PRINTING SERVICES~ AG03-088: WE ARE FAMILY P AG02-54:RCRTN CLASSES F MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 4769 PKRCS-REFUND DAMAGE D PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-..FAC/WATER SVCS(2/6 PKM-FAC/WATER SVCS(2/8 PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES PKM-UTILITY CHARGES AG02-11A:SWM-GEOTECHNI CD-ENPR:TRAM EXTENSION PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT LAW-CONFLICT PUBLIC DE 307.21 16.16 326.40 11.88 1,750.00 2,461.20 170.00 50.00 188.78 185.68 148.77 190.35 113.48 14.48 107.90 91.43 31.24 16.21 15.68 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 656.95 358.02 912.72 22.68 60.38 150.00 661.65 1,750.00 2,461.20 170.00 50.00 1,176.40 1,014.97 995.78 150.00 Page:15 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor 173932 07/15~003 005478 Voucher: 173932 173933 07/15~003 003157 Voucher: 173933 (Continued) Invoice 173934 07/15/2003 004533 Voucher: 173934 173935 07/15/2003 000630 Voucher: 173935 173936 07/15~003 007534 Voucher: 173936 LEBEL, SHELLEY LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF LINKLETTER, MONTSERRAT LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC LONERGAN, WILLIAM J W40320980013 6/27/03 '959867 959234 959271 958250 241338 CA28828 65668 0342947 Inv Date 06/23/2003 06/27/2003 05/28/2003 05/16/2003 05/16/2003 05/01/2003 05/15/2003 07/02/2003 06/25/2003 07/07~003 Description Amount Paid Check Total PRCS-BARK IN THE PARK S PRCS-TOTES FOR DANCE P MSFLT-TIRES/REPAIRS MSFLT-TIRES/REPAIRS MSFLT-TIRES/REPAIRS MSFLT-TIRES/REPAIRS MSFLT-TIRES/REPAIRS MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2882 94.98 92.87 187.85 131.02 34.92 238.47 27.57 13.60 445.58 41.73 41.73 PWS-MEDIUM BARK- 22.88 22.88 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(: 75.00 75.00 Page:16 apChkLst 0711512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173937 07/15/2003 005339 Voucher: 173937 173938 07/15D003 003055 Voucher: 173938 173939 07/15/2003 004431 Voucher: 173939 173940 07/15/2003 001004 Voucher: 173940 173941 07/15/2003 004094 Voucher: 173941 LOWE'S HIW INC MAACO AUTO PAINTING & B MADRONA PLANNING DVLP MAILMEDIA INC MATHESON, DEREK 002417691897 002415090628 002416791398 002417691890 002415590856 002416091078 002414990544 002416791394 002414890459 002416291170 002415590871 002414890462 002414890455 002415190675 002416091076 002414890497 002416891446 002416291158 002416391200 002416391203 002416791401 002414890486 00241499054 002416491265 25160 00002844 00002847 00002845 00002848 00002846 40547 6/26/03 Inv Date Description 06/25/2003 REPAIR 05/30/2003 REPAIR 06/16/2003 REPAIR 06~25~2003 REPAIR 06/04/2003 REPAIR 06~09~2003 REPAIR 05/29/2003 REPAIR 06/16/2003 REPAIR 05/28/2003 REPAIR 06/11/2003 REPAIR 06/04/2003 REPAIR 05/20/2003 REPAIR 05/28/2003 REPAIR 05/31/2003 REPAIR 06/09/2003 REPAIR 05/28/2003 REPAIR 06/17/2003 REPAIR 06/11/2003 REPAIR 06/12~2003 REPAIR 06/12/2003 REPAIR 06/16/2003 REPAIR 05/28/2003 REPAIR 0512912003 REPAIR 06/13/2003 0512912003 SUPPLIES. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES PS-VEHICLE PAINTING SVC 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 05~7/2003 CD-EXPR: ENCHANTED PAR CD-EXPR:RAINIER PACIFIC B CDEPR-PLAT OF COLELLA~ CD-EXPR:WALGREEN'S DRU CD-EXPR: ENCHANTED PAR PRCS-POSTAGE PRE-PYMT F 06/26/2003 CM - REIMBURSEMENT FOR Amount Paid 79.42 70.00 68.94 63.10 51.85 51.06 42.73 32.60 30.58 27.18 25.81 25.10 24.53 24.48 21.66 17.36 15.19 12.97 10.85 10.14 8.61 2.85 407.35 1.59 694.69 240.00 1,470.00 150.00 30.00 40.20 4,803.04 52.13 Check Total 1,125.95 694.69 1,930.20 4,803.04 52.13 Page: 17 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid Check Total 173942 07/15/2003 000960 Voucher: 173942 173943 07/15/2003 005406 Voucher: 173943 173944 07/15/2003 006008 Voucher: 173944 173945 07/15/2003 000977 Voucher: 173945 173946 07/15/2003 007359 Voucher: 173946 173947 07/15/2003 000286 Voucher: 173947 173948 07/15/2003 001793 Voucher: 173948 173949 07/15/2003 003170 Voucher: 173949 173950 07/15/2003 005535 Voucher: 173950 173951 07/15/2003 000228 Voucher: 173951 173952 07/15/2003 001902 Voucher: 173952 173953 07/15/2003 001052 Voucher: 173953 173954 07/15/2003 004950 Voucher: 173954 173955 07/15/2003 003826 Voucher: 173955 173956 07/15/2003 006679 Voucher: 173956 173957 07/15/2003 003922 Voucher: 173957 MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 0000195387 4987895001 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL 2003 SPRING MCLOUGHLIN & EARDLEY C 0011992-1N 0012373-1N MEASUREMENT RESEARCH (FEDWYPMS20 METIER CONSTRUCTION INCJUNE 2003 METROCALL WIRELESS INC 00687948 MICROFLEX INC MODERN SECURITY SYSTE 00014338 00014384 00014278 36234 MULKEY, JOHN 3801O435288O MULTI-SERVICE CENTER MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR NAPA AUTO PARTS 1ST QTR 2003 1ST QTR 2O03 1ST QTR 2003 586 587 585 738080 NASCO MODESTO 215949 NATIONAL ASSO OF TOWN V4677 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF 12003-N041 NATIONAL BAG COMPANY I 5644904 06~30/2003 06~30/2003 07~03/2003 06/12/2003 06/23/2003 06/25/2003 · 06/13/2003 07/01/2003 06/02/2003 07/01/2003 05/09/2003 06/25/2003 01/25/2003 06/12/2003 06/11/2003 06/11/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 05/28/2003 06/19/2003 06/19/2003 06/23/2003 06/04/2003 LAW-AMERICANS W/DIS AC LAW-WA. CT RPTS. VOL 146 AG01-86A:MARTIAL ART CLA MSFLT- POLICE EQUIPMENT MSFLT-POLICE EQUIPMENT MSDP/PW-CENTERLINE SW I PRCS-WALL REPAIR IN ENT MSTEL-PAGER SVC FOR MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM PKM-ALARM MONITORING S PWS-REIMBURSEMENT FOR AG03-092: FOOd & CLOTHIN AG03-093: EMERGFFRANSITI( AG03-091: LITERACY PROGR AG01-66A:LANDSCAPE MNT ,' AG01-66A:LANDSCAPE MNT ~ AG01-66A:LANDSCAPE MNT ,' MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES PRCS-ARTS & CRAFT SUPPL PS-POLICE CRIME PREVENTI PS-NAFTO CONF REG. FEE F PS-POLICE EVIDENCE SUPP 40.33 25.31 1,996.00 980.00 63.50 1,500.00 326.40 3.52 98.70 937.45 93.35 34.82 160.00 7,270.57 8,800.00 3,000.00 2,349.60 870.40 772.28 74.07 115.04 909.00 315.00 318.07 65.64 1,996.00 1 ,O43.5O 1,500.00 326.40 3.52 1,129.50 34.82 160.00 19,070.57 3,992.28 74.07 115.04 909.00 315.00 318.07 Page: 18 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 173959 07/15/2003 000043 Voucher: 173959 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 156261 156002 156166 155878 156238 155322 156530 155477 156381 155691 1559430612 155639 155624 155326 155674 15604 155927 155861 156124 156131 156013 155716 155650 155813 156585 155696 156028 156500 155584 156156 156290 156575 155949 155588 155279 06/09/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/13/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/17/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/10/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/18/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/30/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/25/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/03/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/23/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/06/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/12/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/05/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/05/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/30/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/05/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/18/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/11/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/10/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/16/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/17/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/13/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/06/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/05/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/09/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/26/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/06/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/13/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/25/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/04/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/17/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/19/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/26/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/12/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 06/04/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 05/29/2003 REPAIR SUPPLIES 62.83 58.63 48.94 34.37 34.02 30.50 29.70 28.55 28.09 26.58 25.66 25.55 22,95 22.71 21.65 20.86 20.81 19.53 15.23 15.23 15.04 14.62 14.45 14.06 13.01 11.74 11.69 11.14 11.11 11.01 11.01 9.74 8.80 7.83 66.52 Page:19 apChkLst 0711512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173960 07/15/2003 000089 Voucher: 173960 173961 07/15/2003 004701 Voucher: 173961 173962 07/15/2003 003138 Voucher: 173962 173963 07/15/2003 001391 Voucher: 173963 173964 07/15/2003 006200 Voucher: 173964 NEWS TRIBUNE NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS NORMED NORTH COAST ELECTRIC C NORTHWEST NEXUS INC 156612 156182 156179 156031 156229 155813 156243 155784 156450 1554557 156199 156244 156418 155863 155692 156308' 155463 156231 155814 156475 155713 155982 155626 462586 400102318019 12378-416077 086773201 323/19486 Inv Date 06/26~003 06/17/2003 06/17/2003 06/13/2003 06/18/2003 06/18/2003 06/18/2003 06/09/2003 06/24/2003 06/02/2003 06/18/2003 06/18/2003 06/23/2003 06/10/2003 06/06/2003 06/20/2003 06/02/2003 06/08/2003 06/09/2003 06/24/2003 06/06/2003 06/12/2003 06/05/2003 06/15/2003 06/29/2003 06/20/2003 06/12/2003 07/25/2003 Description Amount Paid REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES REPAIR SUPPLIES PWA-NEWSPAPER ADS/SU 7.81 1.35 7.71 7.16 6.41 5.93 5.84 5,07 4.97 4.96 4.70 4.68 4.61 4.48 4.10 3.91 3.37 3.37 3.18 2.54 2.35 1.76 1.74 138.00 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME 2,047.87 354.91 665.82 500.00 PS-GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL PS-ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: MSGAC-INTERNET SVC JUL Check Total 926.16 138.00 2,047.87 354.91 665.82 500.00 Page: 20 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173965 07/15/2003 003736 Voucher: 173965 173966 07/15/2003 007507 Voucher: 173966 173967 07/15/2003 000504 Voucher: 173967 173968 07/15/2003 007522 Voucher: 173968 173969 07/15/2003 007178 Voucher: 173969 173970 07/15/2003 004837 Voucher: 173970 173971 07/15/2003 007535 Voucher: 173971 173972 07/15/2003 001814 Voucher: 173972 173973 07/15/2003 003088 Voucher: 173973 173974 07/15/2003 005025 Voucher: 173974 173975 07/15/2003 001189 Voucher: 173975 NORTHWEST TOWING INC ODV INCORPORATED 7866 8002 8005 603048 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER OZAKI, TODD TSUTOMU 023203 021296 023197 023510 023839 023513 O23425 023857 023534 023820 023833 023174 023287 03-01-091335 PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY (08134329 PACIFIC UTILITY EQUIPMENT64946001 PAK, CHAN 03-42839 PARAMETRIX INC PART WORKS INC, THE 03-42728 03.43132 112198 PCCI - PROFESSIONAL COM1~21204 21203 PETTY CASH - CM OFFICE CM 7/10/03 Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid 04~8~003 05/28/2003 05~9~003 06/05~003 PS-VEHICLE TOWING SVCS PS-VEHICLE TOWING SVCS PS-VEHICLE TOWING SVCS PS-INMATE MONEY BAG:INV 269.82 236.10 202.37 25.55 06/18/2003 05/21/2003 06/18/2003 06/24/2003 07/01/2003 06~24~2003 06/23/2003 07~02~2003 06/25/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 06/17~2003 06/20/2003 07/09/2003 PWST- MAINT. ITEMS PKM-LANDSCAPE SULPPLI PKM-LANDSCAPE SULPPLI PKM-LANDSCAPE SULPPLI PWST- MAINT. ITEMS PWST- MAINT. ITEMS PWST- MAINT. ITEMS PKM-LANDSCAPE SULPPLI PWST- MAINT. ITEMS PWST- MAINT. ITEMS PWST- MAINT. ITEMS PKM-LANDSCAPE SULPPLI PWST- MAINT. ITEMS CLAIM FOR DAMAGE #03-01 88.08 82.19 6.84 78.24 65.24 42.89 39.72 33.28 33.24 16.60 16.20 10.02 7.61 100.00 05/22/2003 PRCS-FLR MNT FLUSHOMET 109.16 06/19/2003 PWS-CHASSIS FOR 1998 GM 554.88 06/23/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO( 75.00 01/03/2003 05/05/2003 06/25/2003 AG02-113:13 AVE S/14 AVE & AG02-113:13 AVE S/14 AVE & PKM-PLUMBING PARTS/BEA 5,337.34 401.58 61.66 06/20/2003 06/20/2003 07/10/2003 AG03-22:MAINT OFFICE JNT AG03-22:STEEL LAKE JNTRL PARKING REIMB FOR J. SCH 375.00 333.33 272.02 Check Total 708.29 25.55 520.15 100.00 109.16 554.88 75.00 5,738.92 61.66 708.33 272.02 Page:21 apChkLst 0711512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Descri~)tion Amount Paid Check Total 173976 07/15/2003 001166 Voucher: 173976 173977 07/15/2003 007470 Voucher: 173977 173978 07/15/2003 002024 Voucher: 173978 173979 07/15/2003 005941 Voucher: 173979 173980 07/15/2003 005634 Voucher: 173980 173981 07/15/2003 001411 Voucher: 173981 173982 07/15/2003 003725 Voucher: 173982 173983 07/15/2003 007511 Voucher: 173983 173984 07/15/2003 000049 Voucher: 173984 173985 07/15/2003 004788 Voucher: 173985 PETTY CASH - KLAHANEE KLCC 7/10/03 PETTY CASH - MGMT. SVC. 017253 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES 7/8/03 PIONEER MANUFACTURING (INV144654 PORTLAND PRECISION INS POSTAL EXPRESS INC POTTS, RONALD PREGNANCY AID OF S. KING PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL PROPERTY DAMAGE APPRA 5335 BM2305003 WESTWAYLIG 1ST QTR 2003 590799A 588297B 590800 590799a C-2010 547 494-344113 07/10/2003 07/14/2003 07/08/2003 06/19/2003 06/26/2003 05/31/2003 06/18/2003 04/12/2003 06/20/2003 05/22/2003 06/20/2003 06/20/2003 05/29/2003 06/02/2003 06/25/2003 PRCS-ADMISSION TO LAKEV~ CD-RENEWAL CODE ENFOR MSF-REIM WITNESS FUND P PKM-FIELD PAINT PS-REPAIR SUPPLIES~ CITY MAIL PROCESSING/CO[ PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM AG03-100: PREGNANCY Al D AG02-73A:LEGAL SRVCS-SR.~ AG02-73A:LEGAL SRVCS-SR~. AG02-124A: LEGAL SVCS-288 AG00-107C: LEGAL SVC (SI AG02-73A:LEGAL SRVCS-SR.c AG02-124A: LEGAL SVCS-288 MSRISK-PROPERTY DAMAG 229.59 188.41 238.96 970.00 97.92 5,816.05 79.53 375.00 28,414.69 50,239.80 8,703.80 1,455.30 5,820.00 218.75 145.00 229.59 188.41 238.96 970.00 97.92 5,816.05 79.53 375.00 94,852.34 145.00 Page: 22 apChkLst 07/J512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 173986 07/15/2003 000051 Voucher: 173986 173987 07/15/2003 001245 Voucher: 173987 173988 07/15/2003 000533 Voucher: 173988 173989 07/15/2003 004502 Voucher: 173989 173990 07/15/2003 006394 Voucher: 173990 173991 07/15/2003 000202 Voucher: 173991 173992 07/15/2003 005922 Voucher: 173992 173993 07/15/2003 004093 Voucher: 173993 173994 07/15/2003 007376 Voucher: 173994 173995 07/15/2003 000667 Voucher: 173995 173996 07/15/2003 004871 Voucher: 173996 173997 07/15/2003 007521 Voucher: 173997 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC PUGET SOUND MUSICAL TH PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES 17476 QC GRAPHICS INC QUADRANT CORPORATION QWEST QWEST DEX QWEST INTERPRISE RACE(RECYCLING&COMPAC 3082 RADIOSHACK CORPORATIO RAINIER INDUSTRIES, LTD. 74055 RAJUL, MAFE 519-842-1009 504-228-1005 439-922-1003 345-200-2003 980-132-1002 345-200-2003 398-842-1008 699-699-1003 156-140-4276 711-141-1000 303-218-1004 303-218-1004 10636 030906-FWP 02-48031 02-46173 253-942-7800 253-847-3385 015201140000 253-D08-6046 538236 CA22773 Inv Date Descril~tion Amount Paid 06/17/2003 06/17/2003 06/19/2003 06/17/2003 06/18~2O03 06/16/2003 06/17/2003 06/18/2003 06/17/2003 06/16/2003 06/17/2003 06/18/2003 05/13/2003 PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UT[LITIES PKM-UTILITIES PVVT-ELECTRICITY CHRGS PKM-UTILBES PKM-UTILITIES PKM-UTILITIES PKM~UTILITIES PRCS-ROYALTY FEES PREP 3,025.79 2,503.78 2,053.48 1,580.99 1,007.55 3,082.72 982.58 5.84 748.60 10.08 5.84 5.84 1,405.00 06/20/2003 PKM-BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 352.08 06~09~2003 PS-FLEET MAGNETIC SIGNS 326.40 06/30/2003 06/30~003 06/25/2003 06/29~003 0612212003 PW-REFUND BOND REL#01 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 6 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 6 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD 15,879.74 9,552.00 59.15 31.59 391.40 519.35 119.04 56.55 3,699.20 101.25 06/19/2003 MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES 6 06/23/2003 PS-SHREDDER REPAIR SER\ 05/02/2003 MSDP-6' uSB TO SERIAL CA 06/18/2003 PWS-CUSTOMER BANNERS 06/27/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2277 Check Total 15,013.09 1,405.00 352.08 326.40 25,431.74 90.74 391.40 519.35 119.04 56.55 3,699.20 101.25 Page: 23 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 24 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 173998 07/15/2003 005302 RAMSEY LANDSCAPE MAIN 3141 Voucher: 173998 173999 07/15/2003 004518 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATICVOICESTREAM Voucher: 173999 VOICESTREAM 174000 07/15/2003 700320 RODGERS DEUTSCH & TUR Voucher: 174000 174001 174002 07/15/2003 703074 Voucher: 174002 174003 07/15/2003 004849 Voucher: 174003 174004 07/15/2003 007489 Voucher: 174004 174005 07/15/2003 007536 Voucher: 174005 174006 07/15/2003 0~33426 Voucher: 174006 174007 07/15/2003 007140 Voucher: 174007 174008 07/15/2003 005984 Voucher: 174008 174009 07/15/2003 000790 Voucher: 174009 174010 07/15/2003 007450 Voucher: 174010 174011 07/15/2003 000106 Voucher: 174011 174012 07/15/2003 001126 Voucher: 174012 Inv Date 07~07/2003 06/18/2003 07/01/2003 Description AG00-12C:ROW LNDSCP MN AG00-74B: TELECOMMUNICA AG00-74B: TELECOMMUNICA 174013 07/15/2003 005340 Voucher: 174013 07/15/2003 000759 S & S WORLDWIDE, INC Voucher: 174001 02-2-19486-9 797880 0020 162104 9051 797820 0005 4278441 06/26/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 06/11/2003 PWSClP-02-2-194876-9KNT# PWSCIP-02-2-19486-9KNT#5 PWSClP-02-2-19486-9KNT#1 PWSCIP-02-2-19486-9KNT#5 PRCS-CARNIVAL GAME SALTVVATER UNITARIAN CHUC2350R4730 SAMS SANITARY & MAINTEN 78266 78242 SANDERS, BETTY B SANDERS SANDERS, JUDSON D 03-42923 SCHENKEL, KEITH 6/22/02 SCHNEIDER HOMES INC 02-32460 SCHOOL DAZE INC 205850 SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENC50680432 SECURE EYE, INC. 20008 SELECT TRAVEL INC 304301033 07/03~003 06/23/2003 06/20/2003 06/26/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE PKM-JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PRCS-TRVL EXP:RFD&M CO SENIOR SERVICES 1ST QTR 2003 1ST QTR 2OO3 1ST QTR 2O03 SENIOR SERVICES OF SEAT JUNE 2003 07/07/2003 06/24/2003 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 06/12/2003 O4/30/2003 04/08/2003 04/09/2003 03/31/2003 07/08/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHO(~ PS-CITY BUSINESS REIMBUF PW-REFUND BOND REL#92 PRCS-KJP PROGRAM SUPPL PS-NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIP MSDP/PS - PATROL CAR CA PS-AIRFARE 5/11-5/16/03 MIC AG03-086: MEALS ON WHEEl. AG03-084: CONGREGATE M AG03-085: VOLUNTEER TRA PRCS SR LUNCH PROGRAM, Amount Paid 14,081.07 3,615.55 420.55 1,500.00 750.00 750.00 750.00 67.79 124.42 470.88 42.06 69.87 75.00 67.42 3,389.00 95.97 39.00 5,603.20 742.50 2,375.00 750.00 1,425.00 351.80 Check Total 14,081.07 4,036.10 3,750.00 67.79 124.42 512.94 69.87 75.00 67.42 3,389.00 95.97 39.00 5,603.20 742.50 4,550.00 351.80 Page:24 apChkLst 07115/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 25 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174014 07/15~003 004449 Voucher: 174014 174015 07/15/2003 001480 Voucher: 174015 174016 07/15~003 000056 Voucher: 174016 174017 07/15~003 003593 Voucher: 174017 174018 07/15~003 001045 Voucher: 174018 174019 07/15~003 001618 Voucher: 174019 174020 07/15~003 003307 Voucher: 174020 174021 07/15/2003 005921 Voucher: 174021 174022 07/15/2003 003896 Voucher: 174022 174023 07/15/2003 005910 Voucher: 174023 174024 07/15/2003 006414 Voucher: 174024 174025 07/15/2003 004637 Voucher: 174025 174026 07/15/2003 004892 Voucher: 174026 174027 07/15/2003 005886 Voucher: 174027 174028 07/15/2003 007505 Voucher: 174028 174029 07/15/2003 000588 Voucher: 174029 SETON NAME PLATE COMPAI9301533882 9301538272 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 4780-4 2929-6 2928-8 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI29437 SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT LAB I SOS TECHNOLOGIES SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW G STERICYCLE INC STL SEATTLE T F SAHLI CONSTRUCTION TACICAL GEAR SUPPLY TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES SUMMIT LAW GROUP SUMNER TRACTOR & EQUI SUMNER VETERINARY HOS SWlNGWERK GOLF INSTR SYNERTECH SYSTEMS CORF3081 6/25/03 7275 008-280-509 005-224-608 008-227-187 0313529-1N 4091 1052285 0002329355 58011689 58011851 58011930 18430 278758 246357 SPRING 2003 06/24/2003 06/25/2003 06/19/2003 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 06/26/2003 06/09/2003 06/18/2003 05/20/2003 06/19/2003 06/09/2003 06/17/2003 06/20/2003 06/15/2003 06/23/2003 06/25/2003 07/08/2003 04/30/2003 06/25/2003 06/09/2003 06/27/2003 06/27/2003 06/27/2003 PRCS-BARRICADE TAYPE/A PRCS-ECONOMY PRINTED B PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES MSC-PRINTING SERVICES PS-POLICE FINGERPRINTIN PRCS-FIRST AID/CPR TRAIN PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR #51 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES SWM-LABORATORY TESTI SWM-LABORATORY TESTI SWM-LABORATORY TESTI PS-LABOR LAW TRNG:SUPEF PKM-GASKET/SWlTCH/CEL. PS-K9NETERINARY SUPPLIE AG02-39:GOLF LESSONS-SPF MSDP/ALL-UPGRADE AMANE PKDBC-RAMP REPAIRS/RAI PS-ASP TRAINING BATONS~ PKDBC/KFT-PUBLIC UTILIT PKDBC/KFT-PUBLIC UTILIT PKKFT-PUBLIC UTILITIES- 441.05 53.71 112.83 24.20 14.14 243.80 82.82 240.00 32.64 21.92 884.00 80.00 45.00 760.00 21.52 16.76 1,719.00 2,400.00 3,916.80 91.25 746.36 403.22 49.46 494.76 151.17 243.80 82.82 240.00 32.64 21.92 1,009.00 760.00 21.52 16.76 1,719.00 2,400.00 3,916.80 91.25 1,199.04 Page: 25 apChkLst 07/1512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 26 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174030 07/15/2003 002176 Voucher: 174030 174031 07/15/2003 001601 Voucher: 174031 174032 07/15/2003 000873 Voucher: 174032 174033 07/15/2003 005240 Voucher: 174033 174034 07/15/2003 006033 Voucher: 174034 174035 07/15/2003 001267 Voucher: 174035 -"C'174036 07/15/2003 001100 Voucher: 174036 174037 07/15/2003 003162 Voucher: 174037 174038 07/15/2003 002426 Voucher: 174038 174039 07/15/2003 000618 Voucher: 174039 174040 07/15~003 003837 Voucher: 174040 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCT 13664864 TAK I NC 6158 TARGET STORES DIVISION, A101993301 TEMPLETON, SANDRA 6/27/03 THE FAB SHOP LLC TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC TRANSPO GROUP INC U S TOY CO INC Z-1572 Z-1572A 346257 347169 346970 346971 345981 346283 345966 5096 5097 8088722101 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 34339 34893 34269 33497 26327 34443 33469 31094 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SU 7935722 7936118 7936066 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 000F6588V253 Inv Date 06/19~2O03 06/24/2003 06/24/2003 06/27/2003 06/17/2003 06/17/2003 06/05/2003 06/25/2003 06/26/2003 07/01/2003 05/09/2003 06/18/2003 05/23/2003 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 06/18/2003 07/01/2003 07/04/2003 07/01/2003 06~26/2003 05/15/2003 07/02/2003 06/26/2003 06/12/2003 06/04/2003 06/13/2003 06/12/2003 06/21/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total PKM-SCREWS,DRILL BITS, 148.99 148.99 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES-N 3,048.58 3,048.58 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 14.61 14.61 PS-REIMBURSEMENT:POLIC 51.32 51.32 MSFLT - REPAIRS SVC MSFLT - REPAIRS SVC PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES AG01-74A-WEYERHAEUSER I AG01-74A-WEYERHAEUSER I PRCS-WATER BALLOON-WA 1,295.34 1,219.65 2,514.99 57.70 190.88 49.26 9.83 41.10 24.98 21.45 395.20 2,855.60 364.60 3,220.20 26.70 26.70 PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SU PPLI ES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PRCS-FOOD/SUPPLIES PKM-LAWN/TURF SUPPLIE PKM-LAWN/TURF SUPPLIE PKM-LAWNFFURF SUPPLIE PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S 61.33 42.71 105.98 29.28 14.21 28.97 18.82 18.37 691.97 348.16 133.39 7.61 319.67 1,173.52 7.61 Page:26 apChkLst 07115/2003 3.'40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 27 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice 174041 07/15/2003 000769 Voucher: 174041 174042 07/15/2003 005019 Voucher: 174042 174043 07/15/2003 007357 Voucher: 174043 -~174044 07/15/2003 007486 Voucher: 174044 174045 07/15/2003 001805 Voucher: 174045 174046 07/15~003 004552 Voucher: 174046 174047 07/15~003 005704 Voucher: 174047 174048 07/15~003 000294 Voucher: 174048 174049 07/15/2003 007485 Voucher: 174049 174050 07/15~003 006638 Voucher: 174050 174051 07/15~003 000567 Voucher: 174051 174052 07/15D003 000851 Voucher: 174052 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY COl 5849454 5849367 5857994 5833998 5815214 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE33965757-001 34028383-001 34205380-001 30572977-001 UNITED REPROGRAPHICS 48781R-IN 0042682-1N 42681R-IN 0042674-1N 93156430 UNITROL/STINGER SPIKE SY VADIS NORTHWEST 00013246 VALLEY CITIES COUNSELING 1ST QTR 2003 1ST QTR 2003 1ST QTR 2003 1ST QTR 2003 VERTICAL TRANSPORTATIO DVT05646X703 VILMA SIGNS WA ECONOMIC DEVELOPME 257 255 256 252 EDA 7/11/03 WA STATE DEPT OF LICENS 0304564 WA STATE ECOLOGY DEPAR HWEF 2003 WA STATE PATROL 00019684 Inv Date 05/31/2003 05/31/2003 06/05/2003 05/31/2003 05/31/2003 06~4/2003 06~7/2003 07/02/2003 01/03/2003 06/10/2003 06/12/2003 06/10/2003 04~1/2003 05/21/2003 06~30/2003 04/15/2003 04/15/2003 04/15/2003 04/15/2003 06~0/2003 06/2712003 06/27/2003 06/27/2003 06/20/2003 06~30/2003 06/30/2003 06/30/2003 07/15/2003 Description Amount Paid Check Total PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/ PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/ PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/ PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/ PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES/ PWSWM/ST- RENTAL PWSWM/ST- RENTAL PWSWM/ST- RENTAL PWSWM/ST- RENTAL CM~PRINTING OF PRELIMINA CM-PRINTING OF DUE DILl CM-PRINTING OF PRELIMINA PRCS-BOND/UNBIND FOR K PS-POLICE SUPPLIES- RAT T 110.17 827.45 98.87 6.53 51.11 1,094.13 279.85 253.36 6.81 109.91 649.93 423.42 803.34 307.36 8.16 1,542.28 30.31 30.31 AG00-2B: LITTER CONTROL 4,101.42 4,101.42 AG03-105:CHILD & FAMILY C AG03-121: DV ADVOCACY P AG03-077: DV TREATMENT P AG03-078: FAM SUPP CTR L AG01-61:CITY HALL ELEVAT£ 11,250.00 7,500.00 1,250.00 1,727.75 21,727.75 145.14 145.14 PRCS-LAYOUTS DESIGN/TY PRCS-LAYOUTS FOR ALL SI PRCS-LAYOUTS FOR ALL SI PRCS-BANNERS FOR REMO\ CDED - SEMINAR "THE VOl 1,708.16 1,566.72 761.60 843.20 4,879.68 100.00 100.00 MC-COPY OF RECORDS~ J 14.64 14.64 PWSWR-HAZARD. WASTE E 46.00 46.00 MSDP-DATA STATION SVC 3,416.31 3,416.31 Page:27 apChkLst 0711512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 28 Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 174053 07/15/2003 000514 Voucher: 174053 174054 07/15/2003 006853 Voucher: 174054 174055 07/15/2003 005350 Voucher: 174055 174056 07/15/2003 005816 Voucher: 174056 174057 07/15/2003 000783 Voucher: 174057 174058 07/15/2003 001504 Voucher: 174058 174059 07/15/2003 005392 Voucher: 174059 174060 07/15/2003 001241 Voucher: 174060 '~'174061 07/15/2003 000173 Voucher: 174061 174062 07/15~003 002087 Voucher: 174062 174063 174064 174065 174066 174067 WA STATE-STATE REVENUE JUNE 2003 WAHl, PRAN CA29673 WASHINGTON ROCK QUARR 56969 WASHINGTON TOXICS COA 060203S WASTE MANAGEMENT 00283721O554 WASTE NEWS 000005652060 WAYNE INVESTIGATIONS 0024 WEST COAST AWARDS 39794 07/15/2003 000660 Voucher: 174063 07/15/2003 007379 Voucher: 174064 07/15/2003 000520 WSAMA Voucher: 174065 07/15/2003 004651 WSU CAHE CASHIER Voucher: 174066 07/15/2003 001121 WWEE-WA WOMEN EMPLO Voucher: 174067 WEST PUBLISHING CORPORt804461836 804577673 WHITMAN GLOBAL CARPET (;22006 22005 22004 WOODWORTH & COMPANY I 157070 157069 WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES 103-02A-02 03-02B-02 WSAMA P.R. 3430 1ST QTR 2003 1ST QTR 2003 07/08/2003 07/01/2003 06/23/2003 06/02/2003 06/01/2003 06/24/2003 06~27~2003 06/03/2003 05/31/2003 06/25/2003 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 06/30/2003 06~30~2003 05/31/2003 05/31/2003 06/17/2003 06/10/2003 04/11/2003 04/11/2003 MSF-REMIT STATE FEES MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2967 PKM-QUARRY SAND/DUMAS PWSWR-SUBSCRIPT. REN PWSWR-LITTER DISPOSAL PW/SWR- 2YR SUBSCRIPTI AG00-79C:LEGAL PROCESS ,~ PKM-UNIFORM CLOTHING MSDP-DATABASE ACCESS S LAW-RCWA T-34-35A AG98-203C:CARPET CLEANII~ AG98-203C:CARPET CLEANIF AG98-203C:CARPET CLEANII~ PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR PWSWM-GENERAL CONTR AG03-43:ARMSTRONG PROP AG03-44:THOMPSON PROPE LAW-WSAMA MEMBERSHIP [ PWS-PESTIClDE TRAINING 2 AG03-080: REACH PROGRAM AG03-083: CACD PROGRAM 68,700.22 100.00 311.27 50.00 353.00 68.00 400.00 200.74 1,170.81 791.84 398.00 319.89 98.89 239.10 91.85 28,824.01 14,248.49 40.00 32.28 4,768.43 1,500.00 Sub total for us bank: 68,7O0.22 100.00 311.27 50.00 353.00 68.00 400.00 200.74 1,962.65 816.78 330.95 43,072.50 40.00 32.28 6,268.43 2,175,593.92 Page: 28 apChkLst 07/15/2003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 29 297 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 2,175,593.92 Page: 29 apChkLst 0711512003 3:40:06PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 30 Bank code: kev Check # Date 173853 07/15/2003 173958 07/15/2003 Page: 30 MEETING DATE: August5,2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed and approVed by the Finance Committee during their July 22nd meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approval of the June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DEmED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordi...ces COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 CITY OF ~ Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July 22, 2003 Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee Tho Kraus, Finance Manager David Moseley, City Manager June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report Action Requested: Accept the June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report and forward to the August 5th Council meeting for full Council approval. ~ Coi~e~Chair ' Coml~ittee Member ~Y6~mmitte~ Member KSFINNVIFR~,I FRFEDRACCVR.DOC J-1 Cit~ of Federal Wav CITY OF ~ Federal Way June 2003 OuarterlF Financial Report Quarterly manc!a! Report - June, 2003 25.0 20.0 ~5.o 10~0 ; 5.0 YTD Operating Revenues vs Operating Expenditures Thru June 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 ~ REVENUES --.11.-- EXPENDITURES I, The Quarterly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that has taken place in the reporting period. This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Center. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial activity through June for the years 1998 through 2003. 2003/2004 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada is pleased to announce that City of Federal Way has received the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its budget. The award represents a significant achievement by the City. It reflects the commitment of the governing body and staff to meeting the highest principles of governmental budgeting. In order to receive the award, the City had to satisfy nationally recognized guidelines for effective budget presentation. These guidelines are designed to assess how well an entity's budget serves as: a policy document; a financial plan; an operations guide; and a communications device. Since inception of GFOA's Distinguished Budget Presentation Awards Program in 1984, approximately 900 entities have received the Award. City of Federal Wa~, June 2003 OuarterlF Financial Report PERS Contribution Rate Changes The Governor signed ESB 2254 on June 20th which went into effect on July 1, 2003. This bill, which was passed by the Legislature during the special session, changes the contribution rates for the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS). It adopts a new actuarial method for smoothing returns on assets in Plans 2 and 3, the Teachers' Retirement System (TERS), and the School Employees' Retirement Systems (SERS). In addition, it suspends contributions that employers pay towards the unfunded liability in Plans 1 of PERS and TRS for the 2003-05 biennium. They result in member and employer contribution rates for PERS that are more than the current rates but less than those approved by the Pension Funding Council last September. Current Rates Adopted by Pension Funding Council New Rates Contribution (scheduled to go into effect on July l, 2003; Effective Rates however, the PERS rates were superceded by July I, 2003 new rates adopted by the Legislature) PERS 2 Member 0.65% 1.41% 1.18% PERS 1, 2, 3 Employer 1.10% 2.05% 1.18% LEOFF 2 Member 4.39% 5.05% 5.05% LEOFF 2 Employer 2.64% 3.03% 3.03% General governmental operating revenue collections through June total $22.7M which is $436K or 1.9% below the ytd budget of $23.18M. Of this amount, $59K is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the payment of debt services. Attachment A provides a comparison of YTD revenues by major sources for 2003 with comparative figures for the past five years. REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Period Ending June 30, 2003 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::¥:::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::fl.::::::::::::::::: ::'::¥ACt~alS::::::: :::::::::::::::::::ri:::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::20~:::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::i::i~::::::::: :::::::?hr0ug~:::::: :::Favorabre:(iJnfavoi:afile):: Property Taxes $ 3,752,918 $ 3,954,140 $ 7,777,226 $ 4,169,925 $ 4,169,925 0.0% Sales Tax 5,133,108 5,279,120 10,999,574 5,420,776 5,152,879 (267,896) -4.9% Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 68,257 47,003 134,000 54,474 64,585 10,111 18.6% ;riminal Justice Sales Tax 829,146 784,885 1,611,369 781,105 773,930 (7,174) -0.9% Intergovernmental 1,628,782 1,692,281 3,345,546 1,624,846 1,405,631 (219,216) -13.5°/, Real Estate Excise Tax 840,553 1,212,465 1,900,000 823,236 1,393,219 569,983 69.2% Gambling Taxes 1,148,457 1 ,I 16,751 1,850,000 944,202 991,365 47,163 5.0% Utility Taxes 3,362,625 3,427,352 7,747,611 4,069,588 3,558,800 (510,788) -12.6% 3,ourt Revenue 456,835 344,107 1,018,813 486,617 604,516 117,899 24.2% Building Permits/Fees-CD 540,494 819,274 1,179,816 591,465 664,527 73,063 12.4% Expedited Review Fees-CD 53,009 32,358 109,904 109,904 0.0% ROW Permits/Fees-PW 180,101 156,935 369,455 192,611 195,611 3,000 1.6°/, Expedited Review Fees-PW 3,336 36,726 22,258 22,258 0.0% Licenses 50,904 74,394 142,100 66,838 44,071 (22,767) -34.1% Franchise Fees 280,647 324,770 621,964 307,919 323,259 15,341 5.0% Passport Agency Fees 3,060 3,060 n/a Recreation Fees 320,185 344,765 930,450 333,738 340,446 6,708 2.0% Dumas Bay Centre 293,002 229,676 493,750 236,456 268,460 32,004 1&5% Knutzen Family Theatre 36,718 35,453 69,976 25,594 46,648 21,054 82.3% Interest Earnings 525,150 223,966 743,621 355,543 225,133 (130,410) -36.7% ~,dmin/Cash Mgmt Fees 238,153 237,010 526,592 263,296 263,296 (0) 0.0% SWM Fees 1,510,877 1,610,432 3,432,770 1,695,582 1,670,524 (25,058) -1.5% Refuse Collection Fees 75,619 106,725 165,240 110,160 109,0O2 ( 1,158) -1.1% Police Services 382,180 317,691 926,082 447,078 269,527 (177,551) -39.7% Vliscellaneous/Other 36,737 55,956 98,292 42,032 68,253 26,221 62.4% $(~bt~!:.O~bf~iu~:R~v~:~b~:!::::::::::: i:i:::::::2;1i74~ t92:: ::::::::22 454i23~,:: ::::::::46i08;4;2;47:: ::::::::23;:1:7~:: :::::::::22:,738;827: :i::::::(4~6;;4:~2)~ ::::::::::::::::::::: 3ther Financing Sources 5,739,885 4,440,635 16,055,663 11,559,972 11,559,972 0.0% r0~liRb~;bh:d~i&:~0t~e~ri$~ffc~i:i:i:: ":$i:i::27 48? 6~:: :$:::!:26 904 869i: :$:::::1~2;;1~39i9:'J0:: :$:::::;3;4iT35,:Wl:2:: :$::::::34i298:,7:9~[: :$::::{436 4;12): ::::::::::::::::::::: CitF of Federal Wa~ June 2003 QuarterlF Financial Report Real Estate Excise Tar To date, REET of $1.4M exceed the ytd budget of $823K by $570K or 69%. Compared to 2002, collections are up $181K or 15%. June's receipt of $219K is $33K above the monthly estimate and includes several major transactions - the sale of Goodwill Store on Pacific High Way S($2.9M), Travelodge Hotel on S 328th St ($1.6M), an office building on S 336th St ($1.4M), a vacant residential land on SW Campus Dr ($1.2M), and Poverty Bay Retail Center on Pacific High Way S ($1.1M). Sales in the current month include a total of 289 real estate transactions, of which 99 were tax exempt, and of the remaining 190, 14 were mobile home sales. Other significant transactions during the 2nd quarter include: April - Eleventh Place Medical Center on 11th Place S ($2.8M), and an office building on 1st Ave S ($1.5M); May - an industrial vacant land on S 356th St ($1.5M), Federal Way Motel on Pacific High Way S ($1.1M), and Children's World Day Care Center on SW 336th St ($1M). _..,.. .......~.:~..:..:-.:,:.~.~. ~oo2 · .-a~o~- ..~.--- .=;4~"'i.-",!:;:..l'.? A~uatr.-.~.>~[.-."-'~:a~uat '"."K' ' ---. · i "ACfUal Bu~f~et* "! Ac~a~': ".[ '-'$" "-'.;.~[-,.:'.;%,:~- Jan $ 163.211 S 289,269 $ 103,300.$ 92,006 $ 114,439 $ 125,916 S 307, ~354 $ 181,438 144.1% :eb 119,717 65,939 103,388 80,019 112,868 $ 81,200 346,828 265,628 327.1% Vlar 82,116 80,862 166,189 174,165 247,357 $ 126,433 129,942 3,509 2.8% ~,pr 166,282 203,522 166,725 124,749 152,735 $ 136,296 193,685 57,389 42.1% Vlay 189,860 169,610 183,110 139,014 329,252 $ 167,280 196,095 28,815 17.2% Jun 270,672 162,569 182,137 230,600 255,814 $ 186,111 219,314 33,203 17.8% Jul 295,736 278,955 323,080 154,955 162,739 $ 204,995 0.0% ~,ug 324,952 194,853 203,678 168,149 263,742 $ 193,513 0.0% .~ep 137,949 326,168 163,636 361,664 132,464 $ 192,052 0.0% :)ct 204,439 279,424 299,621 148,307 210,334 $ 191,291 0.05 Xlov 143,877 209,096 101,804 155,743 116,037 $ 122,230 0.0% :)ec 132,448 177,881 153,124 168,156 419,672 $ 172,683 0.0% i~:,, ..'t'~u-.T~IT~'~ i$"'."'~ ;'$~'~;:':.?[91;I-~-~:~.,.~~'j '~":;:" 2' 840,553 ,/$ 2~;121 '1,212,465 $ .. 823,236 $ -,'L1,393,219. ,...-.~=,~..,...'.,~...,:, : ...:. ~-'t-'.-.'.-.,..' .: ~...-~-.,-,': [..; .2,;;.;.' :~..2.,:. ........ '' I ' ' ' .... " .4.;:c.~ ,~. ,"-' - .L.,:.! '2~ =., -. , · , '.. . . ; . -- . · ~ .."-. "~-' :~ '."--? ~: .~;-..:. '$'-\"':2,231269'"' ' -;"'"'::"' ' ~'"??"-";~"~L:~'"~":'"::~:"':'*:'"~'; ":""'~:"*""~""*'t "*""'": ......... '000I ' ........ . . 'I .... ".[:' ,.1" ;'.'..-';.,.¢. ~' ~::r,~.-~-:...-~.'--.~..' ,. $~' ~.43~;~4~'}'-"$ ,,',..2,14~.~J0,,;.~;.:5ii,,~?,53r !- $ "-2;317,4r3 $ ii~oo, . :'-'"-' .... YTD Est. RE I$ 198,371,620t5 194,354,200 $ 180,969,618 $ 168,110,592 $ 242,493,004 $ 164,647,200 $ 278,643,742 Value Represents monthly historical pattems for the 2003 Adopted Budget. Sales Tax Sales tax received through June of $5.2M is $268K or 4.9% below the ytd budgeted amount of $5.4M. 2003 ytd revenue of $5.2M is also below June 2002 ytd revenue of $5.3K by $126K or 2.4%. The current month's receipt of $789K is also below the monthly estimate of $852K by $62K or 7.3%. z- -~,t'a-~.x.~ '/998, r-.,~ ~ ~:~.. :~ 2000:~;,..,~ ~-~ .... ..-,, '~ ~:...~-2002 - ..... . .... ..... ,-.,; · , '"' --' -~ .r!,;= · · ", ,"- ~ ' -' ~-~ = .--.}e.~v-----.,.. ~- '"::'"" ...... ~"~' ' ~;" ' ' ' ~ ' · ~ ~, ~"-':" , .r, :' ' "~ -.~ -.-j' ':" '~ ~2-'a ~ ' - :'~i i-?--~ [ t~onth:t ";'-,:.'. --..,'Acrua~; :~ :-' .'1'?' '~. actu~t.:,.-2-~.~~' 'Actuar ~,'.[?:'. ay...'-,' actuat.' *,-..--' -.[~,-..' ,.,,, ' acruat t "'auditer ,r, ~,. Acru,t ...... [ :. $ *..:-~-~-~ -, ~-~- ~,.,-~ Jan $ 638,862 $ 711,432 $ 764,071 $ 794,061 $ 860,153 $ 832,623 $ 822,996 $ (9,627) -1.2% Feb 949,276 1,013,425 1,201,953 1,152,601 1,234,151 1,226,870 1,185,480 (41,391 -3.4% Mar 714,640 717,005 759,673 834,652 750,503 838,199 735,211 (102,988) -12.3% Apr 575,597 633,460 764,524 729,487 730,253 758,811 745,691 (13,120) -1.7% May 655,396 783,051 859,218 927,767 911,658 912,738 874,035 (38,703) ..4.2% Jun 769,461 772,812 797,833 694,540 792.402 851,533 789,466 (62,067) -7.3% Jul 645,475 727,701 798,587 798,287 840,945 842,437 0.0% Aug 682,263 855,198 928,307 879,080 1,010,404 960,618 0.0% Sep 850,295 896,291 778,483 908,664 935,760 970,696 0.0% Oct 761,561 817,021 8,434,698 889,821 897,820 919,426 0.0% Nov 739,326 880,787 908,800 858,019 938,959 957,426 0.0% Dec 800,018 856,762 10,159,770 835,083 870,238 928,195 - - 0.0% -~-i~i.'.'"": "' ..... ''' .... "' .... ' .... ':"'*"' ~, ' " ' ' ' ' ...... '"'"" ..... .$..--..:~, '4,303,233'~ $ ;'....4,831,185'1'$v' ' 5,147,272 .$ : "r5;133't08i- ' ' '. 5,279,120 I $ 'Ii,420,776 [$ '- 5,152,879 .$ ,' (261,898) ~ ,: 4.9~'):: ;~.d: ':"-'"" "':. ':':' : '~' ". .l'- '"? '~ .... : : '!' : .' -' "C"-.. i · i ~': '.: ~'":.i.' ~','.~ Total .$-'.:-,. 5,782,171' .$ 9,664,945 / $'.. 27,155,917 $ 10,~302,061 [ $" 10,773,248 ] $ t0,999,574 [ $ 5,152 879 [ · · i' i:": ': .:.' .~ i *Budget ~s projected based on past 5 year's history. Cit~ of Federal Way June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report Sales Tax by SIC Code Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 65% of all sales tax collections. Ytd 2003 collection is $84K or 2% lower than ytd 2002. Miscellaneous trade, retail furniture, food stores, and Apparel & Accessories are down while general merchandise, Auto/Gas, Bldg. Materials, and retail eating & drinking are up. Service industries account for 12% of the total sales tax collections. On a ytd basis, service sales tax is up $64K orl 1% from ytd 2002. The increase is mainly due to one taxpayer reported a large amusement installation for about $2M of sales in 4th quarter 2002. The late return filed by one major hotel in 2002 is also contributing to the increase in ytd collections. Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 10% of sales tax collections, is $13K or 2.5% below year 2002 activities. This is consistent with the downward trend we are seeing in ytd building permits. Wholesale tax, which accounts for about 5% of total sales tax collection, is $33K or 12% below year 2002 activity due an overall decline in activity. . .~. · · Component · · . · Actual . , Actual ~ [ . Ac}Ua/~:.-"' '1. ,-~.:. $'3 ': .:.! ~., ,~%, ..~. Retail Trade S 2,774,070 $ 2,988,843 $ 3,310,939. $ 3,358,120 $ 3,427,293 $ 3,343,632 $ (83,662) -2.4% Services 398,640 420,297 494,546 515,413 563,101 626,838 63,737 11.3% Construct/Contract 290,423 418,397 589,633 490,731 524,887 511,993 (12,894) -2.5% Wholesaling 261,536 268,390 332,211 328,509 270,480 237,459 (33,021) -12.2% TransplCommlUtility 173,648 188,549 185,923 201,162 192,913 198,002 5,089 2.6% Manufacturing 230,864 185,681 62,225 70,982 113,421 53,745 (59,676) -52.6% Government 66,902 59,455 75,328 66,423 90,803 73,362 (17,441) -19.2% Fin/Ins/Real Estate 53,491 58,885 54,377 52,824 55,778 68,564 12,785 22.9% Other 53,659 42,689 42,092 48,942 40,445 39,286 (1,159) -2.9% SALES TAX ACTIVITY BY SIC CODE YTD Through June 2003 Manufacturing Government ': 1.4% Transp/CommlUtil 1.0% ConstrlCntra~ ~ 9.9% Services/ 12.2% Fin/Ins/Real 64.9% Sales Tax Activity by Area The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates about 13% of the City's sales tax experienced a $10K or 1.5% decline compared to 2002. The increase in Bldg. Materials and Eating & Drinking was over turned by the decrease in other businesses. SeaTac Mall is showing a $39K or 8% decline compared to 2002. The year-to-date tax from the Mall's department stores, which generate 61% of total Mall's sales tax, has decreased $29K or 9% compared to 2002. In addition, retail apparel & accessories down $7K; electronics and furniture down $5K; miscellaneous retail/other down $3K; while retail eating & drinking up $9K. June major auto sales are up $11K or 33% compared to the same month last year. Current month's increase completely erased ytd decline thru May. Ci~ of Federal Way June 2003 Ouarterl¥ Financial Report South 312th to South 316th is up $11K or 4.2% due to a major retail general merchandise store increasing by $13K. The giant discount store tends to doing better in bad economy. Pavilion Center is showing ytd across board decline of total $30K or 13%. Almost one-half of the decline is attributed to the center's biggest contributor due to holding back consumers' spending in bad economy. The construction in this area may be one of the factors, too. Hotels & Motels year-to-date sales tax total $61K, which is $18K or 43% above the same period in 2002. The increase is due to increase activities at one major hotel and timing of payments at another hotel. ' .' SALES TAX COMPARISON by AREA .. YTD Through June'. . . ., . . . :, i .~ ...... :"' [ I i Chg from 2002 .. "':'"' ' . I 1999 ' ~ 2000'!{~":':i ' "2(~3~'".~ -[ 2002[ 2003 · :¥ "~":Group i 1998: '; I , ! $ I "%' Total Sales Tax $4,303,232; $4,631,185 ; $5,147,272 $5,133,108 ' $5,279,120 ! $5,152,879 ($126,241); -2.4% S 348th Retail Block ! $679,822 i $755,922, $787,770: $686,389, $694,101 . $683,781 , ($10,320)i -1.5% % chg from prevyr 104.9% · 11.2% 4.2% -12.9% 1.1% -1.5% na · na Percentage of total 15. 8% 16.3% 15.3% 13.4% 13.1% 13.3% O. 1% 0.9% SeaTac Mall 526,863: 545,344 i 550,434! 547,648; 491,3021 452,613! ($38 689); -7.9% % chg from prev yr 70.3% 3.5% O. 9% ~ -0. 5% - 10. 3% - 7. 9% na na Percentage of total 12.2% 11.8% 10.7% 10.7% 9.3% 8.8% -0.5% -5.6% MajOr AUtO sales 189,62t 191i517 2~830 200~247 218,006 218,603 $597 0;3% % chg from prey yr 139.5% 1.0% 22.6% - 14. 7% 8. 9% O. 3% na na Percentage of total 4.4% 4.1% 4.6% 3.9% 4.1% 4.2% O. 1% 2. 7% S 312th t0 S 316th 43,157 106,55t 238i8~ 256~967 258,995 269~920 $10;925 4i2% % chg from prev yr 86.8% 146.9% 124.2% 7. 6% 0.8% 4.2% na na Percentage of total 1.0% 2.3% 4.6% 5.0% 4.9% 5.2% 0.3% 6.8% Pa¥i!ion Center 68,876 83,439 107;~9 227,174 196;691 ($30,483) % chg from prev yr 102.1% 21.1% 24.5% 3.6% 111.0% -13.4% na na Percentage of total 1.6% 1.8% 2.0% 2.1% 4.3% 3.8% -0.5% -11.3% HotelS&MOtels 18,780 I 21,604 42,246 I 65,025 42,709 61,110 18,401 43.1 % chg from prey yr 141.3% 15.0% 95.5% 53.9% -34.3% 43.1% na na Percentage of total 0.4% 0.5% 0.8% 1.3% 0.8% 1.2% 0.4% 46.6% SALES TAX BY AREA YTD through June, 2003 SeaTac Mall 8.8% Other S 348th 63.5% 13.3% Hotel/Motel 1.2% Major Autos 4.2% Pavilion Center S 312th/S316th 3.8% 5.2% Gambling Tax Gambling tax collection of $991K is $47K or 5% above the year-to-date budget of $944K. In comparison to 2002 year-to-date collections, 2003% tax collection is lower by $125K or 11.2%. YTD collections from the top 5 largest establishments (in terms of tax revenue) have decreased $92K or 9% from the same period in 2002. These 5 establishments are responsible for 93% of the year-to-date tax collections. Current month's collection of $158K is slightly above the monthly budget estimate of $157K. City of Federal Way June 2003 Ouarterl¥ Financial Report · ::;:":.5:: ...... : '~:::. .... ' : .... "' '" "::.:.:.' "/.i.?:' . .::;.i!:f:.' · · ...' ..... 2003 2003 Budget Change M~iith' ;'/:":::i.1998 1999 2000 '/.:: ..200~'.':. "~ :;::.:":"~'.'2002': .... Budget ..:,." Actual $' :i. I · % Jan $28,182 $90,611 $127,344 $193,344 $210,579 156,005 $ 159,323 $ 3,318 2.1% Feb 21,305 98,117 116,227 178,617 212,309 151,800 152,943 1,143 0.8% Mar 23,182 104,183 106,912 183,941 175,625 144,863 160,415 15,552 10.7% Apr 29,498 130,536 142,792 238,928 189,533 177,474 176,029 (1,445) -0.8% May 19,025 150,818 133,715 168,101 167,112 157,198 184,574 27,376 17.4% Jun 20,121 145,174 134,100 185,526 161,592 156,862 158,080 1,218 0.8% Jul 34,691 137,222 141,075 188,828 142,814 150,802 Aug 36,336 110,081 103,991 150,734 150,984 129,820 Sap 36,915 111,146 143,483 183,070 139,851 140,427 Oct 50,005 115,324 156,436 174,314 134,904 164,430 Nov 51,544 118,762 143,530 188,392 119,265 160,735 Dec 48,147 118,390 152,094 189,073 121,874 159,584 ~:~YTD . .~. · , - .... " ' ........... ;;T~I'"": .~":~$141,~i13' · $719,439:' ' . .$761,090 ,.:,..,,...~,:...,:.:4.{,~:,1,i8;4_57: $1,116;751./'"'k'"'f': .;..5~:~. ;.is.,~9.44;202:~:~,~.,$;.~?F.. $"" 991,365' "" "' · $47,163 ;' ': 5.0"/. ..r~rarlo ' · : . '. , .. 4 '.' ~ ~.i:.~. ;': .~:'. -~,,':'":,~:~ ,.-' :'"- · · .: . :~T~t~l.."':;~;-.$39~:~5o' $1:,43o,3~2'~'$1,601:699 $~222,81~8" .' ~'1",9':~,~43 ..... $1;85o,ooo'<"~"' ~' ::' '!' ' na ':" na .:'. na:" ..:: ..- .o ': .......... ' -'e~ :.-'-<~:*".~:-, .... 2001 Actual 2002 Actual ~ -'-" .... .'.-' ',:~ '" '2003Actual Change from 2002 .' ~"","..::.'A~i,~b/ .. O/o , $ % i $ ~.. O/o t s $ ~ % Games/Bingo 0.4% $ 4,081 0.4% $ 4,386 0.4% 3,544 ($842) -19.2% /Punchboards 15.7% 180,785 16.1% 179,913 19.7% 195,435 $15,522 8.6% Cardrooms 83.9% 963,591 83.5% 932,451 79.9% 792,385 ($140,066) -15.0% Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Hotel/Motel lodging tax collected through June total $65K which is $10K or 19% above the year-to-date budget of $54K due to increase activities at one major hotel and timing of payments at another hotel. :' ..'.. ~, .~:~'; · .:..; '.,'i:-' . HOTEl/MOTEL'LODGING TAX REf/EI~UE$j':'~J~':,i. .',,~ :~:~:~." ;.:~'~'~ ~.:'~. ........4 :'~ -..~.~-,-, ,,:~.~: .~.:~;$...' ,~' '. . ., .....~=.. ·., .. · ....:..... - ?.y~ ..;7. Year.~'t~m~un~.~.,..=:~:.' ~..'~ :::~.=: . ~v~'.~:. :~ .~999:.~......, (':':~,20~',- "?~':hl ~...:..,~' 2~f. ; I:~..:~;.~ ,:~,:'v ?~2002' ~" ~4~..~;~3~,~ ~::i~.F. ., ~03.Budget Change 7~'/o~ "': :=' Actual '.'~ ::::. ~ctu~ , 'h 'v Actual :..;~ :. a~al. ~ ~:g~ef:~' ~qYA~tua/~ 5~ ~. .,." ~ ~.:~ ~:-:{,' ' % . dan 5,885 10,145 7,374 7,952 &122 170 2.1% Feb 4,57~ 10,977 &359 8,105 12,316 4,2~1 52.0% Mar 9,~65 11,239 6,072 9,017 12,153 3,136 34.8% Apr 7,553 ~ ~ ,226 7,769 9,031 11,436 2,405 26.6% May 10,383 13,693 &491 11,087 ~ 1,449 362 3.3% Jun 3,751 7,351 10,978 8,938 9,282 9,109 (173) 4.9% dui 6,~90 8,584 10,663 ~3,751 11,276 Au9 5,689 ~2,106 9,933 12,915 11,988 Sep 8,538 15,569 16,071 ~3,802 15,530 Oct 7,6~3 15,967 12,~4 ~3,479 14,433 Nov &971 ~3,463 9,607 13,367 12,516 Dec 5,69~ 16,~63 8,871 ~4,982 13,783 To., .... '. , I'· Table reflects cash basis accounting Utility Tax The utility tax rate increased from 5% to 6% effective February 1, 2003. The additional 1% was adopted by Council to fund new service level adjustments and is budgeted to yield an additional $1.25M. However, at this time we do not anticipate meeting budget projections due to the leveling off of utility tax, 2002's actual falling short of meeting year-end projections, and the 1% increase not taking effect until February lst. As of today, majority of utility companies have filed their amended retums for the Cit~ of Federal Way June 2003 Ouarterl}, Financial Report questioned periods. Council also approved an ordinance earlier this year that would provide utility tax relief for low income seniors. The ordinance would relieve the full 6% of the utility tax to eligible citizens through a City administered "rebate" program. The first requests for reimbursement of paid 2003 (February through December) utility taxes will be due no later than April 30, 2004. Utility tax received through June totals $3.56M, which is $511K or 13% below the ytd budget total of $4.07M. However, the ytd thru June 2003 utility tax receipt is above the same period in 2002 by $131K or 4%. ,, .'Actual';"..q f' .' Actual * '] 't.- Act,al'. '']:~ f;'.'ActuM~', T~ [ Budget'.,, ,~.'~'~"'Actual':'"'" .'' ~i'-..'$'i,e~'~'.."~'~:~ '~.~ Jan $ 432,114 $ 464,657 $ 494,362 $ 559,223 $ 568,968 $ 587,296 $ 519,082 $ (68,214) -11.6°,~ Feb 460,013 480,358 512,067 580,723 584,764 605,430 538,567 (66,864) -11.0~ Mar 431,932 470,869 496,215 595,183 602,121 752,906 597,934 (154,973) -20.6~ Apr 430,450 491,502 559,861 617,404 620,964 800,284 668,438 (131,846) -16.50/~ May 411,958 475,874 466,035 544,080 567,810 712,913 678,680 (34,233) -4.8% Jun 346,110 388,985 409,595 466,013 482,725 610,759 556,100 (54,659) -8.9~ Jul 347,308 389,430 419,539 435,775 442,319 595,797 0.0°,~ Aug 319,072 370,719 383,806 416,374 429,790 560,621 0.0°/, Sep 325,780 394,041 428,707 428,486 429,090 585,151 0.0% Oct 380,445 435,017 462,901 468,293 481,552 652,547 0.0°/~ Nov 314,389 426,991 446,614 466,773 456,405 631,627 0.0~,~ Dec 328,501 412,635 444,629 495,606 490,171 652,279 0.0~ ...: ..... :. '-:' ', .~.,' ......... . ~'..'..~.~'.,~.",,4:~'.::-s.~ '~-v-~.~::,".~',P'.~;'.-'*.";:x~"~-'!;..'h" ;"~"'::.' "1' ' ' ' ' ' '"' "~L~;.";..'.'.-;*2h:,'.'"::.,~.~-~:.-~'.-.O,~:~, ~ :'YTrDfl'otal :., $'. 2,512,51~ i..'.$~';~7~72~ ~$,'.~i.~},9~;135..''' $~3;362,625'{ .$.:3,42'~,352 '$' 4,069,588.- $ 3,558,800 i':$': -' .A .i:' :t;';:; '~? ::: :{.' .:.-';' (~.{.r ~;..,~'~'~:~i:~...:.'~ ;.~i~,,~ ~:~,~-',~ -.: *.-~.---,,.:.; .:l:"-:~,:; !'-."',~-' '~" !~":':; :,.,' ~-'.,'.-¢~-',~?',"',.-:~: ' ':'~ ' "~" An,,',LT.o',,~':: $:'" 4,sJ~;o~3'~,$...,..~;'~0,,;E~'~,l'~'-'-rS, sza,~r; · $~:~,ora,~T$,: S,l.~,ST~, ! '$.: 7,747,611..~,-$.3;$58,800.~, :. ,!.!;....~.~r.~,= The year-to-date electricity tax includes a one-time back payment of $52K from Puget Sound Energy for the audit periods 1999 through September 2002. In June 2003, we also received a payment of $4K from Verizon Wireless for the periods 1999 thru April 2003 based on audit results by Microflex consulting firm. In addition to $4K already receipted for the same audit periods, we are anticipating assessments of $99K on Waste Management and $1 8K on Sprint PCS. Puget Sound Energy reported a sharp decrease in gas revenues due to rate decreases that took effect in September, 2002. Gas taxes are below the ytd budget of $769K by $249K or 32%. Electricity is below the ytd budget of $1.4M by $109K or 8%. Cable taxes are below the ytd budget of $369K by $37K or 10%. Phone taxes are below the ytd budget of $566K by $75K or 13%. Cellular phone taxes are below the ytd budget of $643K by $54K or 8%. Compared to ytd 2002, Electricity is up $188K or 17%, Gas is down $168K or 24%, Cable is up $22K or 7%, Phone is down $5K or 1%, and Cellular phone is up $47K or 9%. Cellular phone activities continue out perform phone's since 2002. ,,,.~:~,..';..,i?,r~'.'"~,,,.';:: · .' ,,~t,.~.- ..-,,e,..~-'.;,:,. '~,~2., " ~"*,',."z.,' ,I ~.,.~.)r'~ ,,,,~.,.~,~. }. , ~'¢ ~'' ,-~-'*-.- ,-'-' :i.-;v · Electric $ 1,041,471 $ 1,103,325 $ 1,135,772 $1,095,778 $1,116,385 $ 2,577,611 $ 1,413,487 $1,304,860 $ (108,627) .7.7°/ Gas 374,516 413,219 458,254 678,979 687,893 1,136,743 769,075 519,974 (249,101) -32.4°/ Solid Waste 148,520 157,934 157,635 179,224 193,399 452,843 210,553 222,779 12,226 5.8°/ CalVe 217,523 241,468 236,819 287,342 310,266 778,217 369,117 332,334 (36,783) -10.0°/ Phone 481,161 526,644 522,832 557,686 495,864 1,170,968 565,733 490,649 (75,084) -13.3°/ Cal~ar 168,728 280,988 348,753 489,457 542,90O 1,417,259 643,385 589,853 (53,5,32 -8.3°/ Pager 5,357 4,803 2,846 3,718 5,002 8,604 4,226 3,370 {856 -20.2°/ ~ 55,301 43,863 75,224 70,440 75,642 205,366 94,012 94,980 968 1.0°/ Cit~ of Federal Way June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report Utility Tax Revenue YTDThru June 2003 Storm Drainage 2.7% Pagers Cellular 0.1% Electric 16.6% 36.7% Phone 13.8% Cable Garbage Gas 93% 6.3% 14.6% State Shared Revenue Year-to-date distribution of $2.18M is below the ytd budget of $2.41M by $226K or 9.4%. The unfavorable variance is due mainly to vehicle licensing fees offset by major increases in liquor profits tax and criminal justice high crime. As of December 5th, the effective date of 1-776, local license fees collected in King and Pierce Counties are being held in an account at the State Treasurer's Office until it is determined whether the initiative is constitutional. According to the State, City's share is $347K but anticipated distribution date is uncertain at this time. Considering the withheld amounts with the State, the result would be a favorable variance of $121K or 5%. ~.~.,~'... ;`~`rc.`;::.r::;; .~;..; :.~``~:~%~:::~g~`v~.~.~:.<~`~:.~.~.~;~~~.~:~:`~ `~: .:.:..:~.: .~ ....... . ,~ ~. .,,_..; ,..; ;':'"' ' "' ~,~ '' 'l ..... ~ ""=:" ~' '~,i~3~?-,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,S~.'.~,' :-,.:.".. ,' .~t.-'-~ ;.,:.?~..-'~, I:r'."'~1}~5:-~. :1 ~t~" .. ,i~it-~P._,~ ......... ~ '; .... [~'~ ~ACtual '..'...5... Buet~/et~ :. t' ':' ;4~}~-'.'-; ~'g{ :,{l~a).'-~, ~,~: ,,~-'_,~,~--'.w:.-~'-'~;~'.'. .~ .', ~. ~- ~ ..,.~ ~ *~' "'* '"'""": .-, ,,,,,,.~_.~ ., .. z,00 .... ~ -: ,:-..;..~0oa~d~S~..'.Z.~.-;,i,.,~.:, ~ ~,.,~ ~-':~'~'gRe~Tu$:;.~: '. l;"';¢¢tua/~."~ : . cma/, ?.'.- '~ ~, ,4cli~l..~..t..~ Motor Vehicle Excise Tax $ 714,607 $ 780,195 $ 202,556 $ $ $ $ $ n/a 0ity Hardship Assistance 35,064 n/a Oamper Excise Tax 14,004 14,353 3,837 n/a Liquor Profits Tax 269,619 210,950 235,148 227,900 249,063 236,854 281,989 45,135 lg. 1% Liquor Excise Tax 119,070 124,354 126,126 138,806 149,264 147,152 151,208 4,056 2.8% Crim Just Low-Pop/DOD 63,737 63,402 52,982 36,876 38,292 38,074 37,763 (312) -0.8% Cdm Just Hgh Crime 140,719 173,087 81,445 81,445 100.0% Equalization 283,210 309,669 24,103 n/a Local Crim Just Sales Tax 648,179 706,008 776,840 829,146 784,885 781,105 773,930 (7,174 -0.9% Fuel Tax 809,245 825,872 832,679 853,042 836,571 835,820 827,g92 (7,828) -0.9% Veh Lic/I Fees 308,371 320,072 355,647 366,597 376,827 366,947 18,196 (348,751 -95.0% DUI - Cities I ' 10,908 5,456 5,560 7,200 7,039 7,039 100.0% Local Govt Fin Asst. I - - 228,709 - n/a · Represents monthly historical pattems (1998. 2002) for the 2003 Budget. City of Federal Way June 2003 OuarterlF Financial Report Building Permits and Plan Check Fees Ytd building permit revenues total $665K, which is above the ytd budget by $73K or 12.4%. This does not include ytd pass through revenues of$1 10K. Revenues collected for expedited review is currently not budgeted nor are the offsetting expenditures. Building permits, which includes mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade permits total $300K and is above the ytd budget by $5K or 2%. Electrical permits of $63K are above the ytd budget of $54K by $9.2K or 17%. Plan check fees of $244K are $45K or 23% above the ytd budget estimate of $199K. . . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING PERMITS/ZONING FEES/PLAN CHECK FEES · 1998 - 2003 '*' Revenue: , Actual l .':. ' :Act~M' ' i actual Actual Actual . Bud~let ' ! . Actual J $ Varfan~e !' $ Vatfance January $ 54,814 $ 77,562 $ 68,683 $ 114,042 $ 235,933 $ 104,830 $ 134,380 $ 29,550 28.2% February 33,057 95,739 64,819 67,205 76,786 67,172 68,531 1,359 20o/, March 45,879 144,848 104,586 98,724 108,771 101,240 94,599 (6,641) -66% April 62,566 88,404 103,334 91,446 119,843 94,241 73,435 (20,806) -22.1% May 60,598 161,106 86,274 69,065 113,178 96,778 104,776 7,998 8.3% June 105,774 165,674 92,413 100,012 164,763 127,204 188,806 61,602 48.4% July 143,030 115,236 101,765 76,038 110,974 113,358 August 129,553 134,784 63,482 99,766 138,017 113,780 September 82,001 96,214 112,409 162,977 84,066 113,333 October 107,654 52,306 119,502 51,303 118,473 92,330 November 88,188 87,017 72, 901 53,826 85,987 78,393 December 52,976 69,149 72,125 67,060 132,036 77,156 -~;'~'~-3';~fi'"~":r:~'r:~]~'~3-3-.-~~' 519,909 $' 540,494 $ ' 819,274' $ '59'~4~5"I'$ .:'"6641527' $ 73,062 [ ' 1Z4~,~, :':Annual.motal:~ '$.~96~';090.;1~.$~'1;288: .0~0;t:$;. "1,062,094.[-$ . 1,051,463I $ 1,488,826{ $ 1,179,81.61 $ .---..664,527 ,'$ :.'.'., 73,062 !. 12.4% Exp thru June** 1,050,282 1,103,928 1,229,246 1,174,157 1,168,217 1,387,709 1,316,871 na na Recovery Ratio 34.5% 66.4% 42.3% 46.0% 70.1% 42.6% 50.5% na na The table below presents a synopsis of year-to-date building permit activity for new construction between 2001 and 2003: Building Division - Permit Activity YTD Through June, 2003 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 :~Ty~/.~P¢~:~:::~::~:~::~:~::::~:::::::::N~:~::::::::::~a~"¢:~$}:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::($~:~:~::::~:~i?;:~:~:~:~¥a~e New Residential (Platted) 18 $ 2,541,358 68 $ 14,007,893 74 $ 16,920,418 New Commercial 9 22,561,235 15 34,692,776 4 450,972 New Multi-Family Units 3 873,919 I 0 I 1,042,389 New Public 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal -New Construction 30 $ 25,976,512 84 $ 48,700,669 79 $ 18,413,779 Manufactured Homes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential Alterations 71 2,379,834 70 !,825,804 66 2,055,940 Commercial Alterations 127 12,156,611 238 14,324,321 115 8,029,083 Plumbing Only 48 0 40 0 52 0 Mechanical Only 175 715,792 154 692,878 150 517,852 Misc. Building Permits 0 0 0 0 0 0 i:Subtotal - Alterations 421 $ 15,252,237 502 $ 16,843,003 383 $ 10,602,875 Electrical Permits 547 0 615 0 524 0 Total Building Permits 998 $ 41,228,749 1201 $ 65,543,672 986 $ 29,016,654 Non-Building Permits: Sign Permits 132 225,806 126 246,542 119 263,843 Totals 132 $ 225,806 126 $ 246,542 119 $ 263,843 ITotal 34,717,846 $ 49,017,097 119 $ 8,480,055 Commercial Valuation 136 $ 253 Commercial as a % of Total 14% 84% 21% 75(/0 12% 29% * Includes all new, alternation Cit~ of Federal Wa~ Jane 2003 QuarterlF Financial Report ROW Permits and Fees Overall Public Works permits and fees collected through June total $196K, which is $3K or 2% above the ytd budget of $193K. Right-of-way permits collected total $47K which is $53K or 53% below the ytd budget of $100K. Plan review fees collected total $50K which is $20K or 28% below the ytd budget of $70K. Public works inspection fees of $98K is $76K or 343% above the ytd budget of $22K. In March 2003, revenues of $77K exceed the ytd budget of $28K by $49K. This is a timing difference, due to when we actually recognize the revenues from developers' deposit accounts. Typically these revenue recognition entries are done on a quarterly basis. · ~ ' . ;.. 'i' 3:pu~i'iC WORldS:PERMITS~PLAN I~EVIEW/IlfSPECrfON .....' ' i:~:.'.:.A..:- :~."~ ' ~' '. ~99s. 2oo3 ... " ~ Actual'". ~:; ~Actuat ':. "A6tUat . 'Actual Actual . Budget · i ac~at I'$ Variance .'/,"Variance January $ 16,168 $ 19,293 $ 23,523 $ 44,253 $ 39,039 $ 33,346 $ 31,391 $ (1,955) -5.9°A February 8,437 16,802 17,837 29,361 13,302 26,924 16,851 (10,073) -37.4% March 12,347 38,782 22,290 12,940 11,707 27,766 76,604 48,836 175.9% Apri~ 19,977 16,286 22,313 23,964 23,975 38,452 14,823 (23,629) -61.5% May 26,621 12,147 45,771 32,040 51,651 34,614 26,878 (7,737) -22.4% June 26,339 17,944 24,811 37,544 17,263 31,509 29,063 (2,445) -7.8% July 21,002 10,644 13,887 29,732 14,223 27.850 August 26,631 23,777 21,405 49,974 36,986 32,803 Septemb_e._r ............... 25,233 10,346 22,846 22,312 21,169 26,209 October 21,878 14,652 17,754 17,687 11,332 24,889 November 28,332 18,508 19,801 25,232 17,465 28,542 December 19,968 38,690 8,163 39,532 41,369 36,552 - :..Year-to-DateTotal -]. $109,909 ;' ~.~($12~';254 ! ..1~$156,545 i;~:'~ $180,101.I' 8156,935 i $192,611 ,-$. 195,611;I.$Vc.'3,000 ~-~..*,v.- 1.6% ":" "AnnualTotal ! $ 252,953- :~$:;-'237,871 ;$~.260,401 I $':364,569 I $ 299,479 ] $ 369,455 [-:.";' ::~ na'l ~-.':-~'.~: na'i:":;-*-'-~-~ ~ .ha Monthly Average I 21,079 , 19,823 ~ 21,700 ~ 30,381 , 24,957 I 30,788 , 32,602 i Surface Water Management Fees Storm water drainage fees collected thru June total $1,670K, which is below the year-to-date budget of $1,695K by $25K or 1.5%. Staff recently learned that SWM fees are subject to the 1.5% state B&O tax under "Service and Other Activities" category which the City had not previously reported or remitted. $24K in B&O taxes was remitted in June and covers SWM fee activity for January through May, 2003. We anticipate the total shortfall due to B&O tax to be around $50K by year-end. 10 City of Federal Wa}, June 2003 Ouarterl}' Financial Report Court Revenue Court revenue is $13K or 3% above the ytd budget total of $422K from fines & forfeitures. Total court revenue collected through June amounts to $605K which is $118K or 24% above last year's collections of $384K by $220K or 57%. Probation services revenue total $169K and is $105K or 163% above the ytd budget. Ytd probation expenditures total $138K resulting in net probation revenue of $31K. A new probation services contract is in the works and is expected to have an unfavorable impact to net probation revenues. :.: :Probation Services.. -. YTDTotal .:., ".,' ;.:.,:'::200~.,':i.?',;. ,,'. ;[.' .Change from Budget ~.~.:t~,d~,n~ · .. B.dget',::'!'~;'Ac. tual'.':['~. SVar I' SVar, Revenue $ 64,167 $ 168,960 · $ 104,793 163,3% ~~Expenses 64,167 138,274 {74,107) -115.5% Includes seven months of activity. ~-:~-~.~ ~-'.~:'~' :: ~;: '...:' ..: .' ..'.~ :: ~'.'~;t£~, "-,~,F c, ~,~,,...~.~ ..:~?;~.~,~...'~~.~_~!:~;~....~,~.~:~ ~,.:~. !., .~ '~.~?A. :7? :..,.. ~. :,~,~.,~.~ ~'-';".-~A~ ~'~..~-.~. ~..:,~. ,--'~ .'.;.~';,.. :-. ,:. ,:'. '~'."-'~-~:~:~ .~:~. e,"-.'.,. ~,, ~e-~-~'.'e,-.-.~-.~,~.~ I~R[~.~-'.~':'-~.?"-.~. ,'-~ .;',..:~.'.': ,-'.-.~,?~..:.-e:.?'...~.~,:':· '~.~ .,-'*'.'~.,.'-~ ~-:~',~.~~ .,. '¥; ....-.' ~. '~ ~-.~;-.'..-.--, - . · ~i. '~ ~ '~:';G~'~'~, i?--':y. ',.,' .:.?. ,, '*'.";~_'" . ':-':.';"~'" ..:,~_.,~.:~ ..... ~-~'~20O2r'fi""':~ ~.:-~,....~. ,...::~:..~.,... ,~,.., Actual f;, :-='~'.-'~1~'.'"~~ ' ' ~, Actuet.-',_~', , ~-',~-~,r,.-.Actaal" ' .... -. .~ ~;'~BiJd!E~let' ] ,j}~$Act~al-' '. ~ ~';(~i$ V~..~.~..~. ..... January $ 60,696 $ 62,565 $ 61,809 $ 78,577 $ 48,982 $ 63,816 $ 55,490 ($8,327 -13.0% February 66,750 66,562 83,491 70,573 57,256 68,634 78,815 10,181 14.8% March 84,382 84,643 83,707 74,074 69,769 80,526 82,635 2,109 2.6% April 57,631 82,673 74,273 77,631 72,609 74,543 73,723 (819) -1.1% May 73,420 61,106 75,541 82,169 46,487 68,011 67,131 (881 -1.3% June 64,260 72,121 73,046 73,812 49,004 66,920 77,763 10,843 16.2% July 80,666 61,536 71,957 59,668 65,189 68,894 ~.ugust 61,751 71,255 97,179 71,793 68,659 73,086 September 72,313 62,059 71,311 67,015 55,775 66,410 October 74,540 58,199 60,635 62,650 79,013 69,583 Novem be r 56, 501 64,346 71,783 52,340 67,344 62, 970 December 55,893 58,863 65,100 45,386 66,133 59,036 Probation Services - 14,631 38,724 64,167 168,960 104,793 163.3% 1'raft Schl Adm Fee - 7,094 1,457 - 0·0% Traffic and non-parking fines total $264K and is $11K or 4% above the ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collections are above by $70K or 36%. Parking infractions total $30K and is $6K or 27% above the ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collections are above by $15K or 102%. DUI and other misdemeanors total $73K and is $5K or 8% above the ytd budget· Compared to ytd 2002, collections are below by $3K or 4%. Criminal costs total $36K and is $4K or 10% below the ytd budget. Compared to ytd 2002, collections are up by $9K or 33%. 11 City of Federal Wa~ June 2003 Ouarterl~ Financial Report GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL EXPENDITURES General governmental expenditures through June total $19.69M or 35% of the annual operating budget of $55.9M. Operating expenditures are below the ytd budget of $20.9M by $1258K or 6%. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT Period Ending June 30, 2003 :::::::::::! :!:!:!i!: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: !: ::::2003:Revised!Budget::::::::}:i:i:~ictua!~!:!;i i:!:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:~/afian <~ei::ii:i: :::!:! :i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:!:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i i:i:i:i:i20~l~:i:i:i:i: :i:i:i:!:2002:::::: ::::::::: ?::::::::::::: :i:i:Thr~ghi:i:i: i:i:i:~h~;Oughi:i:i :iEa~o~!ei(unfavior ab!e): usesi:i:i:i:i:i:!:!:!:!:i:i:i:i:i:i:!:!:i:i:i:i:!:!:!:i:i:!:!:!:!: :!:i:i:!RCt(~li:!:!:!:::i:i:i:~taa~: :i:! :i:::i~nO~li:i:i:i !:!:!:!:!Ju~e:i:!:i:!: :!:i:!:!:!d~n~:!:i:!:i:!:!:!:!:i:i:!:~:!:!:i:!:i :i: :::::::::%::::::::: City Council $ 142,187 $ 187,653 $ 260,050 $ 183,603 $ 198,041 $ (14,438) -7.9% City Manager 325,489 345,976 691,203 357,460 327,804 29,656 8.3% Municipal Court-Operations 543,062 586,364 1,210,569 581,252 670,341 (89,089) -15.3% Management Services 804,871 821,740 2,005,360 967,013 861,707 105,305 10.9% Civil/Criminal Legal Services 570,576 567,439 1,448,586 749,886 534,916 214,969 28.7% Comm. Development Svcs 1,395,112 1,411,662 3,662,187 1,744,256 1,516,747 227,509 13.0% Police Services 6,559,593 6,866,632 15,572,132 7,617,140 7,511,686 105,454 1.4% Jail Services 599,850 480,858 1,342,000 561,696 489,742 71,954 12.8% Parks and Recreation 1,449,941 1,427,857 4,041,628 1,866,064 1,574,809 291,255 15.6% Public Works 1,345,818 1,650,220 4,090,497 1,824,751 1,646,953 177,798 9.7% City Overlay Program 78,695 187,097 2,379,347 677,830 677,830 0.0% Solid Waste 168,019 151,992 420,855 200,808 148,160 52,648 26.2% Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax 10,763 52,785 311,797 34,616 34,616 0.0% Surface Water Management 736,189 858,524 2,198,152 1,018,319 903,356 114,964 11.3% Debt Service 2,257,212 2,215,080 15,630,394 2,241,455 2,241,455 0.0% Dumas Bay Centre 273,527 247,784 493,786 243,609 261,824 (18,215) -7.5% Knutzen Family Theatre 83,063 70,182 177,050 76,472 87,880 {11,409) -14.9% :Subto~!:o,p~rating:Expe:n:ditu~es:::: ::::::~7;,3~,3;~67:: ::::::18:,,72~;845:: :::::,$:5i935;594:: :::::20i9~6i231~: ::::::1:9;687~i856:: :::::::::::::::8,::::::: ::::::::::::6;0:% Other Financing Uses* 9,831,358 7,879,864 20,860,788 14,263,282 14,263,282 n/a ~Total:Expenflitufes:&:ottieruse~::: ::i$:2~;T1~5;325: ::$:26;009;709::::S:76;z96;382::::$:35;209;51:z:::$:33;95~:;~9: ::$:::!:;258;:363:: ::::::::::::3;6% 'Other Financing Uses are those activities considered one time in nature. City Council City Council expenditures total $198K, which is above the ytd budget total of $184K by $14K or 8%. The unfavorable variance is due the additional $1 OK support to Airport Communities Coalition approved by Council but not yet budgeted by ordinance. Other one-time programs include: PSRC membership ($24K); ACC participation ($20K); and association dues increase ($7K). City Manager Activity through June total $328K, which is below the ytd budget total of $357K by $30K or 8%. One-time funding for new programs of $146K include: City Newsletter ($46K); Management Analyst Intern ($14,560); Contract Lobbying Services ($50K); and Update City Video ($30K). Only $43K or 29% of the total one-time funding has been spent thru June. Municipal Court Municipal Court expenditures total $670K, which is above the ytd budget total of $581K by $89K or 15%. The variance is due mainly to higher than budgeted BI contract expenditures which have offsetting revenues. Man agem ent Services Management Services expenditures through June total $862K, which is below the ytd budget total of $967K by $105K or 11%. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs such as: labor negotiations ($15K); recruitment advertising ($16.5K); OPAC (office proficiency assessment certification) software; document imaging system ($26K); Kronos timekeeping system ($21K); Eden financial system ($9.5K); web redesign/data conversion ($30K); wellness program ($6.8K); and education assistance ($12K). Civil/Criminal Legal Law expenditures through June total $535K, which is below the ytd budget total of $750K by $215K or 29%. Savings can be found in the one-time budgets for: CDBG domestic violence and victim assistance program (20K); outside legal counsel ($79K); and public defender ($48K) and also in salaries and benefits due to vacancies earlier this year. Of the one-time programs, thru June, only $13K or 35% of the budget for domestic violence program and $1 OK or 13% of the budget for outside legal council has been spent. Also, 38% of the ongoing budget for outside legal counsel ($84K) and 38% of public defender ($249K) has been expended ytd. City of Federal Way June 2003 Quarterly Financial Report Community Development Community Development expenditures through June total $1.52M, which is below the ytd budget total of $1.74M by $228K or 13%. Savings are due to one-time funded programs of which only $89K or 19% has been spent to date. Adopted one-time funded programs total $173K and include: EDC membership ($8.5K); neighborhood matching grant ($15K); Human Services contract increase ($12.5K); CERT program start-up cost ($4.3K); shoreline inventory ($40K); code amendments ($60K); abatement program ($3K); permit process improvement plan reviewer position workstation and computer ($13.2K); and permit process- collect/draft/interpret non-codified regulations and rules ($15K). Other one-time funds approved through the carryforward budget adjustment total $397K and include: volunteer program, CERT program, matching funds ($7.5K); employee giving & HS contribution ($44.4K); PAA study ($93K); code amendments ($10K); citation delivery ($3K); comp plan printing ($3.7K); intern ($4.8K); consultant ($52K); planned action SEPA ($170K); and EDC web page temp help ($8K). Hotel/Motel Lodging Tax Ytd expenditures of $35K comprise of tourism enhancement grants ($25K), General Fund admin fees ($7K), visitor information ($2K), postcards and other ($1K). Overall revenues total $66.3K and are made up of hotel/motel tax ($64.5K), interest earnings ($1.6K), and postcard sales ($44). Community Development Block Grant The following tables summarizes City and King County managed CDBG projects through 1st quarter, 2003. Information for 2n~t quarter King County managed projects was not available at the time this report was prepared and not all invoices for City managed projects were received or processed by 2"d quarter-end. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CITY MANAGED PROJECTS Activity Summary Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2003 Program Total 2003 Description Grant Award Begin Bal 2003 Ending Expend Balance 2002 Program (open project) 23rd Ave S at 314th St Street Improvements 195,000 195,000 157 194,843 Total 2002 195,000 195,000 157 194,843 2003 Program 961 Planning & Administration (thru 2nd quarter) 90,048 90,048 29,494 60,554 961 Domestic Violence Coordinator 20,000 20,000 3,469 16,531 962 CARES 47,735 47,735 9,598 38,137 971 Emergency Feeding 5,000 5,000 1,250 3,750 972 Community Health 11,000 11,000 11,000 974 PACT - Parents and Children Together 12,031 12,031 918 11,113 975 FW Senior Center Adult Day Health 12,500 12,500 2,460 10,040 Westway Street Lighting Project 160,000 160,000 160,000 Multi-Service Center Employment Services proj 103,050 103,050 103,050 Total 2003 461,364 461,364 47,189 414,175 Total City Managed Projects $ 656,364 $ 656,364 $ 47,346 $ 609,018 Cit~ of Federal Way June 2003 QuarterlF Financial Report Program Description COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT KING COUNTY MANAGED PROJECTS Activity Summary Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2003 Total L-ToD L-T-D* Grant Award Expenditures Recap/Roll Begin Bal Remaining for Exp-2003 2003 Ending Expend Balance 1999 Southridge House Fire Safety Upgrades (C99404) Housing Repair Program 83,400 70,954 140,000 131,128 12,446 12,446 - 8,872 8,872 Total 1999 223,400 202,082 21,318 21,318 ~00o Catholic Community Services Transitional Shelter (C99756) Habitat for Humanity Site Acquisition (C99767) Housin~l Repair Program 15,000 15,000 140,000 129,383 15,000 15,000 15,000 30,000 30,000 10,617 7,316 3,301 Z001 Total 2000 $170,000 $129,383 $15,000 $55,617 $7,316 48,301 Tall Cedars Apartment Renovation (C01416) King County Home Repair Program Hearing, Speech and Deafness Center (C01397) Senior Services of King County (C01414) **Federal Way Community Caregiving Network - FUSION (C01 HomeSi~lht ~C98391 ) 10,000 120,000 10,000 15,000 125,000 150,000 113,165 10,000 10,000 6,835 2,574 4,261 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 125,000 125,000 150,000 150,000 Total 200t $430,000 $113,t 65 $0 $316,835 $12,574 $304,261 2002 King County Home Repair Program Lutheran Alliance to Create Housing - LATCH (C02925) Lutheran Social Services - Intergenerational Campus (C01709) Multi-Service Center - Glenwood Place Senior Residence (C02 Federal Way Boys & Gids Club -Rehab 120,000 5,000 5,000 180,000 123,755 82,592 37,408 28,800 8,608 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,O0O 180,000 180,000 123,755 123,755 Total 2002 $433,755 $82,592 $0 $351,163 $28,800 $322,363 2003 Griffin Home Rehabilitation King County Home Repair Program FUSION Children's Therapy Center Thompason Neighborhood Park Development FW Parks Ocean Ridge Apartments Child Care 15,000 120,000 207,254 30,000 75,000 99,999 (99,999) 15,000 15,000 120,000 23,830 96,170 207,254 207,254 30,000 30,000 75,000 75,000 Total2002 Total Projects Managed by KC $547,253 $0 ($99,999) $447,254 $1,804,408 $527,222 ($84,999) $1,192,187 $23,830 $423,424 $93,838 $1,098,349 * Reflect funds that have either been recaptured (unexpended funds are put back in the pot and reallocated in future years for city's use) or. rolled over (balance is carried over to the next year and added to simiJar project, such as Housing Rehab.) Cit~ of Federal WaF June 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Report Police Services Police Services have expended $7.51M through June, which is below the ytd estimated budget of $7.62M by $105K or 1%. Since police services budget is largely salaries/benefits, lease payments and some supplies, the budget estimate takes this into consideration and excludes one-time funded programs for the monthly budget calculation. As shown in the table below, salaries and benefits are below budget estimate, but are offset by overages in overtime and termination pay. One-time funded budgets total $874K, of which only 21% of the total has been expended to date. These one-time budgets include: traffic school ($3K); explorer program ($5K); state and federal seizures ($301K); LLEBG & COPS More grants ($337K); temp help for volunteer program ($20K); Building Bridges/Westway ($20K); Reinvesting in Youth ($5K); Narotics K-9 ($5K); AFIS Spillman System Interface ($22K); Mugshot System ($6K); and vehicle, computers and other setup costs for new positions ($151K). Public Safety Personnel COSts 2003 YTD ThrU June $ Variance % Variance Annual Favorable Favorable Budget YTD Budget YTD Actual (Unfavorable) (Unfavorable) Salaries/Wages 8,903,927 4,451,963 4,216,361 235,602 5.3% P3 278,318 278,318 196,341 81,977 29.5% Temp Help 60,216 30,108 30,108 100.0% Overtime 255,000 127,500 302,868 (175,368) -137.5% Termination Pay 32,151 (32,151) n/a Benefits 2,211,460 1,105,730 990,297 115,434 10.4% TOtal perSonnel COSts 11,708,921 5,993'620 1 5;738i018 255,602 4.3% Year-to-date Police overtime is 42% or approximately $186K below the same period last year. There is a $16K increase in overtime for contracted services and the homeland security programs. When the increase from the billable overtime is included the total overtime is decreased by 36% or around $170K during the first six months of the year. PS Overtime By Type Type 2002 2003 $ % Training 51,976 17,876 (34,101) -66% Court 20,231 27,178 6,947 34% Field 336,110 182,875 (153,234) -46% SOAP 1,049 2,272 1,223 117% Other 35,436 28,766 (6,671) -19% City Portion 444,802 258,966 (185,836) -42% Contract or Grant $ 27,939 $ 38,842 $ 10,902 39% Homeland Sec. 5,061 5,061 NA Billable 27,939 43,903 15,963 57% Grand Total $472,741 $302,869 $(169,872/ -36% As shown by the month-to-month overtime comparison graph, the decrease started in February and has stayed about half of last year's spending since March of this year. If the trend continues, we should end the year with around $550K total overtime costs for a reduction of 40% from 2002. $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 Police Overtime Expense + 2002 + 2003 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month Cit~ of Federal Way June 2003 Ouarterl~ Financial Report The 2003 budget considers the elimination of the $25 court administration fee which was redirected to traffic school fee, and an additional $25 for other indirect costs. The budget also establishes a direct expenditure budget of $60K is to cover direct ongoing traffic school costs such as overtime and supplies, etc. The following is an analysis on traffic school activity. Thru June, revenues total $112K while expenditures total $28K, resulting in net revenues of $84K. Traffic School Activity YTD 'l'~ru June · . Change from 2002 '~998 -"' 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 $ Chg % Chg Reverme $ $ 32,400 $ 33,925 $ 59,688 $ 29,862 $ ~12,060 $ 82,19~ 275.3% Expenditures: Overtime 9,364, 14,579 19,199 17,719 24,379 (6,660) -37.6% Supplies - 995 277 12,425 3,750 8,675 69.8% Travel/Training 964 2,600 2,600 100.0% Other Charges 114 33 352 195 157 44.6% Capital - - 3,372 3,372 100.0% Total Expend 10,442 15,607 19.476 36,468 28,324 8,144 22.3% Rev Over / (Under) Exp $ $ 21,958 $ 18,318 $ 40,212 $ (6,606) $ 83,736 $ 74,054 -1121.0% The following table identifies Public Safety's current grants and contributions activity. Life-to-date expenses on these active grants/contributions total $147K, leaving a remaining balance of $280K. Surveillance cameras on Pac Hwy Downtown Core Narcotic and Prostitution Activity LLEBG 2001 86,520 9,613 18,868 77,265 10/29/2003 reduction Program Implement wireless conn fr RMS to the mobile COPS 2002 138,900 46,300 35,876 149,324 8/1/2004 computers in 40 patrol cars. LLEBG 2002 67,013 7,446 33,897 40,562 10/1/2004 Video cameras to patrol vehicles, tasers BJA 2002 23,244 23,244 33,603 12,885 9/30/2006 Bullet Proof Vests Capital One 2002 5,000 2,557 7,557 n/a School Zone Program; traffic violations Washington Traffic Ddve Hammered, Get Nailed DUI/Seat Belt Safety Commission 2002 7,993 3,651 1/2/2003 overtime mobilization enforcement St. Joseph Hospital 2003 400 274 126 n/a Safety Station Express Event Walmart 2003 600 356 244 n/a Safety Station Express Event Puget Sound Energy 2003 10,038 10,038 n/a WESTWAY LIGHTING/PSE-01-48525 Washington Traffic Overtime Rei for Click-it Or Ticket seat belt Safety Commission 2003 4,500 3,426 6/19/2003 mobilization, May 19-June 19, 2003 Jail Services The table below compares activity through May as June invoices have not been paid. Jail Services is below the ytd budget of $562K by $490K or 13%. The annual budget of $1.34M may be slightly high when compared to 2002 annual total of $1.07M. >.-~,.,.~,,., ,:,'~...~998. .... [',,.::..- ~999 .... ! .... 2000 ,.-..--J ..... 200~.,..~, ..... 2002,-, ,., l' ' Budget .. Actual . ,: $'Var'-..':'! ,',',:%:var.;'.,.'v January $ 60,188 $ 94,333 $ 120,003 $ 111,723 $ 108,739 $ 104,341 $ 92,944 $ 11,397 10.9% ;ebruary 65,197 90,164 128,139 116,334 112,436 108,264 86,453 21,811 20.1% ~larch 70,915 121,485 144,080 120,793 99,516 115,827 95,849 19,978 17.2% ~,pril 65,056 125,588 138,973 129,903 84,259 112,174 103,717 8,457 7.5% ~ay 83,468 149,750 160,082 121,097 75,907 121,090 110,778 10,311 8.5°A June 80,496 150,656 124,017 121,974 74,045 113,642 0.0% July 118,741 183,945 122,690 102,848 92,830 129,861 0.0°A ~,ugust 107,773 163,973 108,249 94,176 91,360 118,729 0.0% September 104,243 108,393 104,715 115,010 89,959 111,390 0.0% 3ctober 93,824 115,714 110,104 98,208 79,586 104,878 0.05 November 97,708 113,844 114,645 72,631 64,463 102,292 0.0% IDecember 91,347 111,013 101,125 88,610 78,485 99,513 0.0% :.¥T'DTo{ai~,['$. 344,824 $' 58t.320!$ 691,276 $-'.'599,850J$" 480,858 $ 56~,6~)6 ~ .... ~89-,~-2-i~' ..... 'i~'9~4-['"~-"~"~-~ Grand Total! $ 1,038,956. $ .1,528,859 i $ 1,476,823 i$ 1,293.306 ! $ 1,071,585i $ 1,342,000 i ' i i =' .... City of Federal Way June 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Report Parks and Recreation Parks Operations expenditures through June total $1575K, which is $291K or 16% below the ytd budget of $1.87M. Savings are due largely to one-time funded programs such as: senior program ($25K); continue contract maintenance ($12.5K); arts commission contracted services ($40.5K); fleet & equipment replacement ($36K); Steel Lake work shed ($15K); Barclay Ridge Trail ($12K); and facilities repairs & maintenance ($39K). Recreation and Cultural Services Direct program expenditures total $407K or 30.3% of the total annual budget of $1.34M not including indirect costs. Including indirect administration costs, recreation expenditures total $590K and are 34.6% of the total annual budget of $1.71M. Recreation fees total $338K and are 37.5% of the total annual budget of $902.5K. Recreation fees have recovered 83% of direct program costs and is 15.7% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 67.3%. Considering indirect administration costs, the recovery ratio is reduced to 57.3% or 4.5% above the annual budgeted recovery ratio of 52.8%. Dumas Bay Centre Operating expenditures through June total $262K, which is $18K or 8% above the ytd budget of $243.6K. Dumas Bay Centre operating revenues of $268K are also up by $32K or 14% compared to the ytd budget of $236K. Dumas Bay Centre has recovered 102.6% of its operating expenses. Knutzen Theatre Operating expenditures through June total $88K, which is $I 1K or 15% above the ytd budget of $76K. Operating revenues of $47K is also up $21K or 82% compared to the ytd budget of $26K. Knutzen Theatre has recovered 52.3% of its operating expenses. RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS Aquatics 2,000 119 5.9% 20,621 3,360 16.3% 9.7% 3.5% Arts & Special Events 87,600 31,593 36.1% 105,950 56,743 53.6% 82.7% 55.7% Youth Athletics 58,450 33,445 57.2% 86,801 28,690 33.1% 67.3% 116.6% Adult Athletics 198,000 112,360 56.7% 112,981 59,368 52.5% 175.3% 189.3% Community Recreation 165,500 87,191 52.7% 136,627 84,173 61.6% 121.1% 103.6% Community Center 26,500 12,016 45.3% 87,555 35,070 40.1% 30.3% 34.3% Recreation Inc 17,700 20,936 118.3% 52,076 30,534 58.6% 34.0% 68.6% Youth Commission 500 64 12.8% 1,800 653 36.3% 27.8% 9.8% Red, White & Blue 24,700 3,850 15.6% 41,200 9,732 23.6% 60.0% n/a Senior Services 7,500 13,504 180.1% 82,301 34,941 42.5% 9.1% 38.6% Kenneth Jones Pool 314,000 23,077 7.3% 614,000 63,970 10.4% 51.1% 36.1% Administration - 0.0% 366,977 183,249 49.9% n/a n/a TOTALRECREATION :..:t':.'$.F.'= 902~450 1 $ ' 338~154 1 '37'5%.1 $ 1,708,889 I.$ :' 590,484'1" :, 34.6%I .. 52.8%I 57.3% DUMAS BAY CENTRE Dumas Bay Centre 493,750 268,654 54.4% 493,786 261,824 53.0% 100.0% Knutzen Family Theatre 74,476 45,938 61.7% 177,050 87,880 49.6% 42.1% TOTAL'!DUMAS BAY CENT~ :$!!':.).i 568~226.'I $ : :"3i4,591..I ':' 55.4%I' $ 670,836 I $. ' '349~704 I' .'L.. 5211%1'.?': ' 84.7%I. Arts Commission j I -] . n/a} 85,745[ 5,064 J 5.9%, n/aJ · GRAND;TOTAL ~' :..'.. .... [ $:~'~1~470.67;,['$' ' 652,745 [ '?': 44.4°/.J $ '2,465i470 ~{ $'.-',~ := 945,252..{'.. ,~ 38:3% [~'/.[~;.-'~- 59.7%! :.' · 102.6% 52.3% ' 90;0% n/a 69;.1% Revenues do not include grants, interest earnings, or operating transfers. Expenditures do not include residual equity transfers or other interfund contributions. City of Federal Way June 2003 OuarterlF Financial Report Celebration Park Operating revenues total $2.3K (concession fees) while operating expenditures total $137.9K. Expenditures are comprised off personnel costs ($101K); supplies ($14K); utilities ($12K); repairs & maintenance ($3K); other services & charges ($4K) and internal service charges ($4K). Actual., Celebration Park Operations .' ' YTD June Operating Revenue - Concesmon Fees $ 2.287 Transfer-In from Utility Tax 220,803 Salaries & Benefits 101,066 Supplies 13,905 Professional Services 708 Leases/Rentals 2,800 Electricity 11,277 Water & Sewer 984 Repairs 8, Maintenance 2,725 Interfund Charges 4,470 Kenneth Jones Memorial Pool Ytd pool expenditures total $49K and includes a $35K payment for the pool's continued operations under King County. This amount is net of the $76K one-time payment received from King County to be used for the operation and maintenance of the pool. Full transition of the pool under King County operations to City staff occurred on June 23fa. ~,~_.et}nel:b?Jbnss Memorial Pool.;.'*, ~ .~-'"*'~,;-~. ; ~¢Anhual_~.~,~~ =~~!~' Operating Revenue 314,000 $ 23,077 Transfer-In from Util~ Tax 300,000 65,000 Salaries & Benefits 7,6~ King County Parks-lnterlocal Agreement 34,631 Travel & Training 909 Inte~und Charges 6,250 The following table summarizes thc pool's activity under King County's operations. Through May, revenues total $76K and expenses total $174K. At the time this report was prepared June activity report from King County was not available. Course Revenue 8,804 6,377 5,171 6,592 8,446 35,390 Rental Revenue 3,664 3,668 4,505 2,958 3,349 18,144 Point of Sale (Drop-In) 4,359 2,077 4,054 7,110 4,936 22,535 Salaries & Benefits 22,611 27,863 27,524 26,726 21,023 125,748 Supplies 507 1,626 1,082 1,289 4,503 Utilities 5,369 7,430 9,550 2,047 15,398 39,794 Other Svcs & Charges 252 1,844 518 939 3,554 18 Cit~ of Federal Wa~ June 2003 Ouarterl¥ Financial Report Public Works Operations Public Works Operating expenditures are below June's ytd budget of $1.82M by $178K or 10%. Savings can be found in various one-time funded programs including: auxiliary generator ($110K); traffic impact fee analysis ($29K); LED lamp retrofit ($88K); traffic counts ($40K); traffic counter ($6K); workstation, computer and other setup costs for new positions ($32K); color basket/banner start-up costs ($50K); tree replacement ($20K); and CTR ($4.5K). Also contributing to the favorable variance is the timing of contract payments and delayed hiring of the two new positions. The street systems project engineer and senior traffic engineer were hired the beginning of March. Solid Waste and Recycling Operations Expenditures are below ytd budget of $201K by $53K or 26%. Savings are attributable to timing of grant programs. Surface Water Management Operations Expenditures are below ytd budget of $1018K by $115K or 11%. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs including equipment ($11K) and SWM Inspector vehicle, computer, and other setup costs ($43K), as well as salaries and benefits due to not hiring the SWM inspector until the first part of April. Emergency Management $ 7,000 $ 800 11.4% Contracted Engineering Services 500 0.0% Expedited Plan Review (1) 19,696 n/a Neighborhood Traffic Safety-Private Contract 10,000 0.0% Pavement Marking Maintenance-Private Contract 15,000 0.0% Access Management Retrofits 8,000 0.0% Expedited Plan Review n/a Contracted Engineering Services 8,000 0.0% Neighborhood Traffic Safety 40,000 0.0% Traffic Maintenance-King County 360,100 111,891 31.1% Traffic Impact Fee 28,667 14,111 49.2% Street Maintenance - Private Contractors (2) 247,327 32,279 13.1% Street Maintenance - WSDOT 50,036 4,362 8.7% Structure Maintenance (3) 119,367 119,367 100.0% Pavement Management System 20,000 0.0% Solid Waste Litter Control 48,250 20,315 42.1% Water Utility Billing - KC 82,053 0.0% Watershed Interlocal Agreement 5,524 3,444 62.3% State Highway Maintenance - WSDOT 20,000 0.0% Water Analysis 13,877 2,148 15.5% Str. Sweeping, Catch Basin, Manhole & Pipes 214,840 19,883 9.3% ESNNPDES Gap Analysis (including 1-time) 15.000 3,220 i ._21.~5.% ~now & Ice Removal 26,200 ~ 0.0% (1) Expedited plan review service expenditures have matching revenues. (2) Pdvate Contracts for streets maintenance/traffic control ($16,687), ROW vegetation, mowing and tree maintenance ($161,000), stump grinding, irrigation services, dangerous tree removal ($10,000), small works projects ($14,000), noxious weed control ($6,000), paving inspection services ($19,640), and tree replacement ($20,000). (3) Private Contractors for sidewalk, ramps, curb and gutter maintenance ($112,696) and fences, guardrails, barders and retaining wall maintenance ($6,671). City of Federal Way June 2003 Ouarterly Financial Report CASH & INVESTMENTS The City renewed its contract with US Bank for another 4 year period, effective July 1, 2003. US Bank offered the lowest price of the seven proposals received and has demonstrated their ability to meet our banking service needs. As part of the banking services review, and in an effort to increase interest earnings and/or liquidity, the City opened two new accounts which include: Municipal Investor Account (MIA) - This is a floating rate Public Funds savings account and is directly competitive with short-term CD's Repo's. Also, the funds are totally liquid as well as protected by both FDIC and WPDPC, making it one of the most secure investments available. The rate on the account is indexed to Fed Funds + 35 basis points based on the opening deposit. Compensating Time Deposit - This is a Certificate of Deposit and is an agreement to keep funds on deposit with the bank until the current maturity date. Additional deposits are not allowed and penalties may be imposed on early withdrawal. The interest is considered an earnings credit and is used to offset banking service charges. Any excess earnings credit is retained by the bank. The City currently has $700K in this account with an earning credit of 2.5% compared to June's general checking account earnings credit rate of 0.81%. Beginning July 1, the earnings credit rate will be based on the Fed Fund rate which is currently at 1.0%. The following table shows the in-house investment activity schedule and their related yields and comparison to benchmark. Per policy, the basis used by the City to determine whether market yields are being achieved is the range between the average 6 month US Treasury Bill (0.94%) and the State Investment Pool (1.19%). The current in-house yield is 2.90% which is greater than both benchmarks. ~.'.ltneesfment';:i:: .:-,,y" Call.: ::, !.',. Agency- FHLB 3133MXS75 04/17/2003 $1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 07/17/2003 07/17/2006 3.15% Agency- FHLB 3133MYH59 05/15/2003 $ 800,000 $ 799,500 08/15/2003 11/15/2006 3.31% 3.06% Agency- FHLB 3133MYHH3 05/20/2003 $1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 08/20/2003 02/20/2007 3.28% Agency- FHLMC 3128XOFJ3060 11/05/2002 $1,000,000 $ 999,500 11/05/2003 05/05/2006 3.50% Agency- FFCB 31331QMF1 12/23/2002 $1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 12/23/2003 12/23/2005 3.00% Agency- FFCB 31331ON78 06/09/2003 $1,000,000 $ 999,500 03/09/2004 03/09/2007 2.51% 2.46% A{,]ency - FNMA 3136F3VO6 05/27/2003 $1,000,000 $ 1,000,750 05/25/2004 05/25/2007 2.42% 2.48% Agency-FNMA 3136F3UT1 05130/2003 $1,000,000 $ 997,529 06/0312004 12/03/2007 2.75% 2.59% Agency - FHLMC 312925A34 04/22/2003 $ 800,000 $ 823,594 07/23/2004 07/2312007 2.10% 4.50% Compensating Time Deposit 05/02~2003 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 06/02/2004 2.50% Average Maturity 606 Average Yield to Maturity 2.90% Average Yield - 6 mo. T-Bill 0.94% Municipal Investor Account $ 29,778,903 1 day 1.55% State Investment Pool $ 20,831,541 1 day 1.19% Average Portfolio Maturity & Yield 63 1.71% Total In~sttnent~ !~.r:-~.~,~,.'~,, .~.;~.,,~.~.'..~:-?~ i.. ,~z ~-:....~:...: ~.,.: . $759,930,817..; . .,.~d,~..,.,:.. :...- ~i....: ~.:~.. ,,.,.~. The total invested balance at the end of June is $60M, which includes $21M in the state investment pool, $8.5M in-house investment purchases, $30M in the Municipal Investor Account, and $700K in the Compensated Time Deposit. The state pool is composed of agency coupons (2%), discount notes (66%), certificates of deposit (7%), treasury securities (5%) and repurchase agreements (20%). The City's total investment portfolio is made up 35% State Pool, 14% In-House Investments, 50% Municipal Investors Account, and 1% Compensated Time Deposit. City of Federal Way June 2003 OuarterlF Financial Report SIP Average Invested Balance by Type June 30, 2003 Treasury Securities ~, Repurchase 5% \ Agreements Certificates of \ 20% Deposit7% ~--~~ Discount Notes 66% Agency Coupom 2% Municipal Invenstors Account 5O% Total Portfolio by Category June 30, 2003 State Compensated Investment Time Deposit Pool 1% 35% In-House Invest (Agencies) 14% Investment Interest Rates Comparison 7% ¸ 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 · 6 Month T-Bill · State Investment Pool Din-house Investment OMunicipal Investor Account · Portfolio Average The following is a schedule of outstanding debt as of June 30, 2003: OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT - As of June 30, 2003 Amount Beginning Ending Funding Date of Maturity Originally Outstanding Amount Outstanding Callable Callable Description Purpose Source Issue Date Inter~st Rate Issued Debt Redeemed Debt Date Amount Genera/Oblt~ation Bond. F: 1991 Limited & 1993Refundin~ Cclebration Park Acquisition REET 13-May-93 01-Dec-21 2.70-5.85 12,105,000 11,455,000 11,455,000 01-Dec-03 11,130,000 1993 Limited Develop Sa~,halie Park REET 14-Jun-93 01-Dec-08 2.70 - 5.70 2,390,000 1,170,000 1,170,000 Transport. & Street Improve 1995 Limited Pro, iects Utax 28-Dec-95 01-Dec-05 3.90 - 4.75 5,000,000 1,880,000 1,880,000 Transport. & Street Improve 1996 Limited Pro, iccts Utax 29-Feb-96 0l-Dec-05 3.50 - 4.50 2,500,000 935,000 935,000 Knutzen Theatre, Sportsficlds, 1997 Limited Downtown PS Facility Utax 22-Apr-97 01-Dec-12 5.00 - 5.30 16,150,000 9,915,000 1,450,000 I 1,365,000 0 l-Jun-06 3,660,000 Purch St. Maint. Mower & 1999 COPS Dump Truck REET 0 l-Aulg-99 01-Jun-04 5.16 184,000 59,936 19,472 79,408 Valley Camm (911 Dispatch)- 2000 Limited Center Bldl~ & Equipment REET 12-Sep-00 01-Dec-15 5.31 2,551,600 2,327,000 2,327,000 Total General Obligation Debt $ 40,880,600 $ 27,741,936 $ 1,469,472 $ 29,211,408 14,790,000 Public Works Trust Fund Loan: 24-Jul-96 & PWTL SWM CIP-Kitts Comer Proiect SWM 04-Sep-97 01-Jul-14 1.00 1,555,440 1,034,873 1,034,873 SWM C1P-SeaTac Mall 3 l-May & 14 'PWTL Detention Proj. SWM Au~, 01-Jul-19 1.00 2,475,000 1,634,035 1,634,035 !Subtotal PWTFL 4,030,440 2,668,908 2,668,908 Grand Total $ 44,911,040 $ 30,410,844 $ 1,469,472 $ 31,880,316 $ 14,790,000 City of Federal Wa): Jane 2001 Monthi~ Financial Report Under RCW 39.36.020(2), the public may vote to approve bond issues for general government in an amount not to exceed 2.5% of the value of all taxable property within the City. Within the 2.5% limit, the City Council may approve bond issues not to exceed 1.5% of the City's assessed valuation. Prior to the passage of new legislation in 1994, the statutory limit on council manic (non- voted) debt for general government purposes was 0.75% of assessed valuation. Another 0.75% of council manic debt was available only for lease-purchase contracts (RCW 35.43.200). These two components have now been combined and can be used for any municipal purpose, including using the entire 1.5% for bonds. The City's remaining debt capacity without voter approval is $73M and an additional $59Mcan be accessed with voters approval. The voter approved capacity is generally referred to as unlimited tax general obligation debt, which requires 60% voter approval and the election must have a voter turnout of at least 40% of those who voted in the last State general election. With this vote, the voter approves additional property tax be levied above and beyond the constitutional and statutory caps on property tax. In addition to these general purpose debt capacity, RCW 39.36.030(4) also allows voters to approve park facilities and utility bond issues, each limited to 2.5% of the City's assessed valuation. Therefore, legally the City can issue up to a total of 7.5% of the City's assessed valuation in bonds for $428M. The table to below shows the available debt capacity for the City as of June 30, 2003. General Purposes Excess Levy Excess Levy Total Councilmanic Excess Levy Open Space Utility Debt {Limited GO) (Unlimited GO) and Park Purposes Capacity $ 88,688,213 $ (88,688,213) 147,813,688 147,813,688 147,813,688 $ 443,441,064 DESCRIPTION AV= $5,912,547,524 (A) 1.50% 2.50% Add: Cash on hand for debt redemption (B) 13,210,020 Less: COPs outstanding (79,408) Bonds outstanding (29,132,000) REMAINING DEBTCAPACITY $ 72,686,825 $ 59,125,475 $ 147,813,688 $ '147,813,688 GENERAL CAPACITY (C) $131,8'12,300 (A) Final 2002 Assessed Valuation. (B) Fund balance as of 6/30/03 of $13,210,020 in debt service prefunding balance and $0 in utility tax fund. (C) Combined total for Councilmanic, and Excess Levy capacities. 13,210,020 (79,408) (29,132,000) 427,439,677 The Public Works Trust Fund Loans are the obligation of the Surface Water Utility and backed by the rates collected from users thus not considered as the City's general obligation debts nor are they subject to the limitation of indebtedness calculation. The 2003 adopted budget includes using $10M in excess utility tax to retire the 1993 refunding general obligation bond for the acquisition of Celebration Park. This will reduce the annual debt service to be repaid with REET and will substantially shorten the average life of the City's long-term debts. Cit~ of Federal Way June 2003 Ouarterl}, Financial Report FUND ACTIVITY SUMMARY ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Special Revenue: Aderial Strut 695,572 1,383,0~ 677,830 705,2~ 1,400,806 Utility Tax (1) 7,872,948 3,585,770 11,458,718 (7,872,948) (0) Solid Waste & Recycling 162,896 158,563 148,160 10,402 173,299 Special Study (Gov. ~) 106,511 795 3,235 (2,440) 104,071 Hotel/Motel Lodg lng Tax 182,119 66,280 ~,616 31,664 213,783 2% for the Ads 28,114 10,~0 (10,~0) 17,274 CDBG (2) 5,943 50,082 29,494 20,588 26,531 Paths & Trails 51,592 4,532 4,532 56,124 [subt~ta!:~pec~:Re~:~nds~:~:~:~:~:~: :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:g;~:os;s95~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~,~249,~086~ ~:~:::~:::~:~:~:~2;~2;8~: :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~;~3;~ :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:::~;~;8~: capital Project: Public Safety Facili~ 7,~0,966 59,~1 42,354 102,195 7, ~3,161 Downtown Revitalization 1,031,140 - 1,031,140 (1,031,140) 0 Unallocated 1997 Bond Pro--ds 20,365 - 20,365 (20,365) (0) Community/Senior Center/Pool 358,838 35,~1 323,197 323,197 Celebration Pa~ 107,908 733 733 108,641 PaA Improvements 574,042 814,652 398,078 416,574 990,617 Suda~ Water Management 6,6~,716 716,036 446,880 269,156 6,903,872 Transpodation 8,092,939 7,057,333 4,431,751 2,625,582 10,718,521 ~Ubto~al~Pi~!:~j~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~23;~2;~7: :~:~:~:~:~:::::~:~:9;0~7~3~: :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:6j~6j2~: ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:2~85~93~ ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~58&~8: Enterprise Funds: Suda~ Water Management 487,502 1,672,950 1,4~,074 188,877 676,379 Dumas Bay Centre Operations 268,460 261,824 6,636 6,636 Dumas Bay Centre Capital 162,098 165,108 151,523 13,585 175,683 Knu~en Family Theatre Capital 99,660 1,089 1,089 100,749 Knu~en Family Theatre Operations 146,648 87,880 58,768 58,768 subt~ta!:Eqte~s~:~un~s~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~: :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~49~260~ ~: :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~2~,~25~ ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~!;~5;3~: :~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~26~55: ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~;0~8;2~: ~ntemal Se~ice Funds: (3) Risk Management 4,057,551 362,922 159,979 202,943 4,260,495 Info~ation Systems 1,962,972 830,985 783,658 47,326 2,010,298 Mail & Dupli~tion 140,528 110,222 77,~0 32,682 173,209 Fleet & Equipment 2,119,918 683,025 712,246 (29,221) 2,090,697 Buildings & Furnishings 809,6~ 212,553 151,150 61,403 871,037 ~aHn¢~¢~e~J~e:Eudd~::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: (1) Util~y Tax and Debt Se~ice fund balance is resewed for the payment of debt sewi~. (2) CDBG deficit fund balan~ due to timing of grant reimbursements. (3) Internal Sewi~ fund balan~ is comprised of accumulated replacement resewes for the pu~ose of fixed asset repla~ment, with the exception of Risk Management, which is comprised of accumulated resewes for self-insuran~ and strategic resewe. 23 Cit~ of Federal Way June 2003 OuarterlF Financial Report SUMMARY ATTACHMENT A Sou;tees/uses: :::::::-::.:.::.:-:.:.:~99a:.:,:.:- :::81.9998.:.::::::8888888888888828888888888888882988888888 ,Beginning Fund Balance $ 13,915,993 $ 17,580,138 $18,050,656 $20,817,900 $22,799,494 $ 24,275,991 $ 24,598,825 $ 24,598,825 $ 0 0.0% 3pe~ting Revenues >rope~y Taxes 3,324,069 3,512,023 3,642,~2 3,752,918 3,9~,140 7,777,226 4,169,925 4,169,925 0.0% Sales Tax 4,303,233 4,631,185 5,147,272 5,133,108 5,279,120 10,999,574 5,420,776 5,152,879 (267,896) -4.9% qotel/Motel Lodging Tax 3,751 ~,915 68,257 47,003 134,~0 ~,474 64,585 10,111 18.6% 2Hminal Justi~ Sales Tax ~8,179 706,008 776,~0 829,146 784,885 1,611,369 781,105 773,930 (7,174) -0.9% ntergovernmental 2,722,583 2,832,861 2,067,242 1,628,782 1,692,281 3,345,~6 1,624,~6 1,405,631 (219,216) -13.5% ~eal Estate Excise Tax 991,858 971,771 904,~8 840,553 1,212,465 1,900,~0 823,236 1,393,219 ~9,983 69.2% 3ambling Taxes 141,313 719,439 761,090 1,148,457 1,116,751 1,850,~0 944,202; ~1,365 47,163 5.0% Jtili~ Taxes 2,512,578 2,772,245 2,938,135 3,362,625 3,427,352 7,747,611 4,069,588 3,558,8~ (510,788) -12.6% 2oua Revenue 407,138 429,670 451,868 456,835 344,107 1,018,813 ~6,617 604,516 117,899 24.2% ~uilding Pe~its/Fees-CD 362,688 733,333 519,909 540,494 819,274 1,179,816 591,465 664,527 73,~2 12.4% ~x~dited Renew Fees-CD 5,7~ 35,267 49,308 53,~9 32,358 109,904 109,~4 0.0% ROW Pe~its/Fees-PW 109,909 121,254 156,~5 180,10~ 156,935 369,455 192,611 195,611 3,0~ 1.6% Expedited Renew Fees-PW 31,429 15,720 3,336 36,726 22,258 22,258 0.0% _icenses 28,5~ ~,0~ ~,581 50,9~ 74,3~ 142,100 66,838 44,071 (22,767) -34.1% :ran~ise Fees 227,465 236,989 237,613 280,~7 324,770 621,964 307,919 323,259 15,~1 5.0% =asspo~ Agen~ Fees 3,060 3,060 ~a Re~eation Fees 248,625 339,100 278,909 320,185 ~4,765 930,450 333,738 ~0,446 6,708 2.0% 3umas Bay Centre 163,~0 234,~6 245,167 293,002 229,676 493,750 236,456 268,460 32,~4 13.5% 4nu~en Family Thea~e 26,785 33,773 36,718 35,453 69,976 25,5~ 46,~8 21,054 82.3% ntemst Earnings 337,666 520,917 518,830 525,150 223,966 743,621 355,~3 225,133 (130,410) -36.7% ~dmin/Cash Mgmt Fees 82,995 ~,240 85,295 238,153 237,010 526,592 263,296 263,296 (0) 0.0% SWM Fees 1,578,363 1,563,126 1,585,166 1,510,877 1,610,432 3,432,770 1,695,~2 1,670,524 (25,058) -1.5% Refuse Colle~ion Fees 73,219 62,~1 59,942 75,619 106,725 165,240 110,160 109,~2 (1,158) -1.1% =olice Se~s 62,923 176,385 431,788 382,180 317,691 926,082 ~7,078 269,527 (177,551) -39.7% Mis~llaneou~O~er 734r495 55r484 36~517 36,737 55~956 98~292 42~032 ~ 68,253 26,221 62.4% rO~l. Op~fi~g.~ve~s.:.:.:. :-:.:-19;0~7;~: .:.:.:20~8~,~13- .:-:Z1;043.~4 -:.2~;747;79Z :-22;~;23~: :.:.:.~,0~7: :.:.:2~;1.75;2~ :.:.:~8~82~. .:.:.:.:(~36~4~3} :.:-: :-:-:.~;9% 3,370,762 ~pe~ting Expenditures ~i~ Council 118,424 126,~7 119,152 142,187 1~7,553 260,050 ~i~ Uanager 295,32~ 2~2,453 22~,~0 325,4~9 ~5,975 ~91,203 357,450 327,804 29,~5~ 8.3% ~uni~pal Cou~-Ope~tions 33~.256 ~3,~2 5~,364 1.210,~ 5~1.252 670,~1 (B9.0~9) -153% Management Se~ices 740,121 83~,212 795,4~9 ~04,~7 ~ ~21,740 2,005,3~ ~7,013 ~5L707 105,305 10.9% Ci~C~minal Legal Se~ces 752,5~0 ~ 780,2~9 515,133 570.576 5~7,43~ 1,44&586 74~,~86 534,~16 214,~5~ 28.7% Comm. Development Sv~ 1,276,0~ 1,339,5~ 1,47~,350 1,395,112 1,411,~62 3,562,187 1,744,255 1,51~,747 227,~9 13.0% ~olice Se~s 5,452,274 5,~52,97~ 5,381,911 ~,559,5~3 ~,8~,~32 1~,572,~32 7,517,140 7,511,~86 105,454 1.4% ~ail Se~s 344,824 5~1,320 691,275 5~9.~50 480,858 1,342,000 561,5S5 48~,742 71,g~ 12.8% Pa~s and Recreation 1,2~1,570 1,377,573 1,440,~5 1,449,~1 1,427,~57 4,041 ,~2~ 1.856,0~ 1,574,B09 291,255 15.6% Public Wo~s 1,49~,~05 1,392,~25 1,452,219 1,34~,81~ 1,~50,220 4,090,497 1.~24,751 1,~46,953 177,79~ 9.7% Ci~ OveHay Prog~m 100,3~2 ~,745 165,~4 7&5~ 1~7,0~7 2,379,~7 577,~30 577,830 Solid Waste 113,662 11&0~ 144,~39 16&019 151,992 ~ 420,855 200,~0~ 14~,150 52,~ 2~.2% Hote~Uotel Lodging Tax 17,518 10,753 52,7~5 311,7~7 ~,~15 ~,51~ 0.0% Su~a~ Water Uanagement ~3,129 771,803 742,94~ 736,1~9 ~58,524 2,1~,152 1,01~,319 903,356 114,9~4 1~.3% Debt Se~i~ 1,037,923 2,2~,361 2,250,7~ 2,257,212 2,215,0~0 1~.530,3~4 2,241,455 2,241,455 0.0% Dumas Bay Centre 198,221 229,877 249,329 273,527 247,784 493,7~ 243,~9 251,824 (18,215) -7.5% Knu~en Family Theatre 47,8~ 81,516 83,0~3 70,1~2 177,050 75,472 87,~80 (11,409) -14.9% ~otal Operating ~nditures ~3,853,278 16,0~,629 17,195,432 17,~3,967 18,129,~5 5~,935,594 20,946,230 19,687,866 1,258,~3 6.0% Ope~ting Revenues over/(under) Operating Expenditures 5,214,299 4,835,7~ 3,848,282 4,403,825 4,334,389 (9,851,~7) 2,229,0~0 3,050,960 821,950 36.9% ~er Financing Souses 2,822,839 5.3~1,0~8 7,2~,373 5,739,8~5 4,440,535 1~,055,663 11,559,~72 ~ 1,55~,g72 0.0% )~er Financing Uses 2,0~,372 9,253,813 11,425,325 ~,831,358 7,87g,8~ 20,8~0,788 14,263,282 14,263,282 0.0~ ~ndtng Fund Balance Solid Waste 250,650 251,~5 239,724 254,550 260,69~ 71,971 173,299 ~e~al Street 1,529,810 1,69~,621 1,448,~01 1,71~.929 1,~44,~3 0 1,400,8~ n/a U~li~ Tax 1,403,365 3,052,636 4,482,214 3,424,425 5,171,706 31 (0) n/a Snow & I~ Remo~l 100,~0 100,~0 100,~0 100.000 100.000 100,~0 100,~0 Su~ace Water Management 2,030,272 858.599 1,6~1,605 62,5~9 174,367 ~92.700 67~,379 ~a n/a Pa~ & T~ails 8,4~ 17,~3 27,176 37,61~ 45,763 ~ 60,~92 S~tegic Rese~e 2,023,178 2,038,426 2.050,0~ 332,424 n/a Debt Se~ 4,223.795 4,249,489 3,550,~5~ 7,53~,238 6,446,0~ 3,872,572 13,2~0,021 Dumas Bay Centre Operations (2,167) 10,145 (2,5~9) 9,495 (~5,073) 3,4~5 Knu~en Family TheaEe (41,113) 37,~1 3,981 (13,620) 21,2~3 Poli~ 407.291 436,015 320,4~4 623,1B1 523,671 427,838 518,462 ~a n/a P3 300,~0 300,~0 300,000 300,~0 300,000 300,000 300,~0 Inte~und Loans 10,000 10,000 10,~0 10,000 10.000 10,~0 30 Unrese~d 7,675,21B 5,485,285 3,482,620 6~737,422 8,812,75~ 3,7B0,~9 8,415,480 ~a ~l.E~ln~.Fu~nca.:.:.: $ 19,918,760 $ 18~,166 $17,703,985 $21,130,252 $23,694,654 $:.:~6~9~519::$.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.::~.:~4;9~.47~..$:.:. :.~21.~5~::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~a 24 07/11/03 W. Hylebos Channel Stabilization SW 356th Street Drainage Study/SW356th St Closed Depression Acquisition East Branch Lakota Creek Restoration Lakota Wetland Regional Detention Pond 6/02 Design 1/99 Land Acquisition 5/03 4/03 12/04 12/03 12/O4 12~04 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SWM DIVISION PROJECT STATUS REPORT 10/04 N/A 10/04 10/04 Paul A. Bucich, P.E., Surface Water Division Manager CH2M HILL, the consultant finn for this project is proceeding with final design and obtaining permits. 80% designs are completed. Due to mistakes made by NOAA Fisheries who partially sponsors this project through a grant, the Section 404 permit cannot be obtained on time. The initial project schedule was very aggressive. The delay of obtaining the permit made it impossible to construct this project in the summer/fall time window allowed by resource agencies for in-stream work. Therefore, the construction of the project will have ,2004. $1,211,295 217,113 This project is funded for design, right of way acquisition, and construction. Preliminary design was completed in re.arch 1999. Property acquisition is under way with only one parcel left to be acquired. Due to significant legal costs attributable to condemnation, this project is expected to over mn allotted funding requiring a budget adjustment once the legal costs and settlement costs $ 623,535 592,034 Design team has completed topographic survey and mapping, and stream geology/geomorphology reconnaissance. Currently the team is working on hydrology/hydraulic modeling, identifying problem areas and solutions, and establishing restoration $1,479,997 162,518 Design team has completed topographic survey and mapping, and hydrology/hydraulic computer modeling. The team is currently working on design drawings. The drawings are nearly 60% level tion. $767,370 104,862 Lakota Creek Restoration (two projects to be combined into Annual Programs Minor CIP/Major Maintenance Lake Loren, Lake Jeane, and Easter Lake HSPF modeling; Mirror Lake/Fisher's Bog modified outlet analysis; Panther Lake Optimization Study; Other major maintenance projects R/D Retrofit 6 - 9 ponds Lake and Stream Steel Lake survey for noxious weeds in Spring 2003; water quality improvements to discharges into Steel Lake in summer of 2003. Water Quality Storm Drainage Hot Tape Stencil; Creek and pond temperature monitoring program; Catch basin insert evaluations 7/02 1/0! K:\ClP~swmO71603.doc 12/04 12/01 10/04 N/A MWG, the consultant firm for this project, is proceeding with final design and obtaining penmts. 80% designs are $2,079,977 The annual programs are used to correct deficiencies posing hazards in major conveyance systems, solve minor localized flooding problems improving water quality and habitat, reduce the liability aspects of publicly owned R/D facilities, and restore lost functions and values of City's many streams and lakes. Each year a list of projects is developed for each of the following programs: - Minor C1P/Major Maintenance - R/D Retrofit - Lake & Steam - WQ Improvement Projects Total: $226,296 224,767 102,876 PUBI TC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFTC DZVZS1rON PRO3ECT STATUS REPORT Rick Perez PE( Traffic Engineer /? :.~..(.~ .-_;::~ ,:.-; ...~.,. ,~,...~.~.,,~_. -.*L'~ ~...,,~ "-*.:.?~-?-:.*~:**~-'~- .: ~, :- ~....~.S~t4,AT.~pR,Q.3EG~*'RHASE.~.,STAR~.'T~,;':'!~ ..... · ..... * ........... '~"~'='~':: ..... '" ...... · :' ' ...... ' ,.).: ,.,-.,'., ':'... :~'...- ~-.-~,'%-,-r;~,..-'-~ ' _.", .- ..,: ~ · --' . '...,. · - ~.'...?::':"~'~? ~'.;':."~ ~.".,_Q~.~;'?..:~.~.~:'.,~: · ?; .::.~... ~.....'-ADDFTED. '~ ".~ :'._,.. ~.BUDGET:.. :: ,i:'::' ~PRo3.sc'r-'r~r. LE' .. :.~ ?TART .~ ;'C..O.I~P.i-~..E'~I'~i ";"~ "~=-~ ;'? .... : :~ ...... ..~.,,., .;,. ,...~::.=,·-,, .~ ....... :.,:. · ~'~ ~ ~' :-::~..: . -' '.'-DATE.'.... '"r' .DATE; '~:'~'1.:~. ~O~'g_~(~i/..~e'.r~-.~...: i~..DesignL' _:~::(.--.:/~ ,~.'-"-"~ ~ ........ .. ~:~ ..~ ,., ;'-.~-.r-.--.:': ~../.~ ..... :-'':"- '':..~...~:'~".,[~,~.. ........ :"'~' "'- . -':.. -',,~.,,'".: ~,- ' ' .. ~' ....... . .-" I ' S 312t~' Street at 8'" ~./03. 12/03 1/01 N/A 12/02 N/A 6!03 Project was awarded to HI Electric for $500,000 S500,000 Avenue S Signal I S231,445. Work began on July 14, 2003 and will be complete by the end Design ,?z,,c/ of the year. Constr~CtlO[~ S 312u' Street at 14:" ~ 1/01 3/04 5/01 N/A 7/01 N/A 10/03 Project is fully funded al~d the design $180,000 SO Avenue S Signal I is 50% complete. There is an open house on 3uiy I/, 2003 from 6:00pm to D~,s/gn andI 8:00pm in the Council Chah'~bers. Constr~c't/on I S 314:" Street at 23':~ 1/0! 4/04 5/0! N/A 7/03 N/A 10/03 Project ~ncludes S195,000 CDBG $2~.0,000 SO Avenue S Signal funding. The Engineering consultant is proceeding with the design and 30% Design ai?d complete plans due at the end of July. Construct/on There is an Open house scheduled at · the Semor housing on 23''~ Avenue for J July 24~ 2003 at 3:30pm. k:\cip\traf0702.doc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREETS DIVISION PROJECT STATUS REPORT 07/14/2003 .M'.,rwan .',;alluum. I'.E. Street Systems Maria . ... ~ .. ..:.. . ... .:.,~,-~ ....,. .~ :' ,:.:.,g..~..~.j ~ · .. . .,: . .'. ~,., . . 2.1lc: :\~,eflllC .~,o Rodd 8 g.~, 12 il2 N A [ Oo ? 9¢, 12:9g i 6 !)I I"rojcct ww, completed bv. DI'K. Inc. m .Ian:v,v. 2 [mpmvc:ncnt:~. $ ~ 3 [ '-lit S: lo contra¢Io: J:as subrn;tlcd ;a $633.33? ('lam; fi,~ ad:hnon,fl~' ROW South 320th .~ll't2~2: - I I lb P.acc ; :9~ 12 03 i 9~: N A N A N A N A I he sficcl~,ca[)e plo.;ecl 'a, as complelcd 1,923.9~o Sou:h tn 1-5. t ;ldtL', Thc only rcmalmng :lcfii ti) h~: completed on I.;ndergn~uad .md Street,;cape thc Cl,.de, grounding of over Ilead ti:dines wflhul t,f fl:v~ work. P:.lClf]t' J'[I.dhway Soud~ Il(IV 5:9g 12 03 h:gg ? 99 9 9g ~ OO ? 02 Tim. prtu¢c: is urn:let construclam Thc COlllr:lctor 15 lO .%'o. 3241h .~tl'u'ct J)c,tMtt.J ()CIobcF 2 i ) f' 'kA 2], Ti'P! J (.'onstru,:.':on) J~aCilic I hgh~sa? bo:cci,, 1 IOV j I h:Oi) 12 1,3 .N~A g IlLI 6 O0 ] ~:l. iI) J 4 {13 PlO:COl IS lx'::~g v*orkcd on !:1COl~;tll'l¢llO[I wl:h thc S324th .%~rcct 1.146.5o6 I. i46,506 b, lrc'cl Io ~o .{241h $:;'C¢I J'qO?;Ct ~1~ a (;Jl[ll;k:t' ()ri!er. ~," '"'- '.' ...... '~-:~' ':-:"-':' · i~-'.~m'~.~:i-i.~.i~'~:.',.'.'.~ ,~,~"-~;~;~~-k'~.~'!~;'..~!';'' ~-~"'-'~"-~::" ~'-:'~'" ..... -~ ...,.,., {C...... "'~':'-'" ,:2, · '.;- '~"'""::~; ~_r.-?~..'.~.~_'~--~-~-~,'~,i~'::..'.x-':'.';"-o%?i-:',-' .~?~,~E~'~L~"'c';:;~?} ~,re--,-'*X. .O.'~. -- ,~. ~ · ~~ ........ -,- ';'......''.,~ ,~ .... .- ,,: %.i,;'-: ~?~`.;~.``..`~g'.`~:~;.9:..~..;~..;~?;a.4~ci``~..;~';~e-~..:`..`..~i:`.~.'~. ~,:;,.,:;,,- :i~.;;-.;..:,.~.:~:,.l.?..-(.;..:,(.;..:.....~_,....[ ? .' ~;}]-.~. --'- :'; ............. ,' ........ - :--' ',' - :'~ '-:'. ':-~ -' '?~ ;,;...,.~'--: ..... ..-.~_~: - ..;. ,., ::.-, .... ....... :.,;..',.~... · ~,,~ .... ...... ':v. -,'.'::-.:i?:'."'- ~' "', .:.-';;'.ca:,.'_'" ;'. ~:' ..-*"':;,, "~:-, '.; :.<;~'.~ii'"a,;,;:' i';~ ~,'."~.,";.i -,.._.i~:;~:";' .¢.~'-'.i~. ~,:.. .;.:-~ v.?;'.. .: :? .-,~- ,:.'..';,. : :..y: . -,;. ,.'.:..:;.::,~ ,,¥ =. -,~,~: ............ · ...... : .... :,.;., ,,..:, .,: ; .... . Paehqc Hi,'i~,av Sot:ih [-{OV - - [ .: {.. t) iL1. ? (l~ i ii/JO ) ) [..iO0.i}Oi! .'~ll'et'l Iii D::<h Pm;l! Road Consu[tallt is CH2M HJJJ, Jnc.. currently working on l)c.,M:n. R¢);i.' project prehminary destgn. (T'J-A 21. TPPI (Dc-L,4ni 200.I :\sl)ha.: OVt'lldys t)~{}2 l ]-0~ i) IiZ N/A I ()Z N~/A ~- ().i '['hl~, iq flit'C[ 1.4 un¢.ior etJnsJ;UClloll. The COll.~rlltilo;· 1.4 I("()N 9 .Mater!,dF,. J]$llllldlei] DIt.~.'.ccI ¢Oi;lpJetlon Lc; :\tl~L:S[ SRg9 to .M:5:.uy R.;t:.J SouIh lOc(Il 12.(J.l I!LOi 1:O2 4 02 I 0" 6dj.'. 'l'hl:~ prelect :~ ma.ter cor:s':r uct!o,"l. The corltrdct¢~f I:; I'faak 275,5,357 Deccmb¢~ 2Oii.~ (TIA. I I ES; J & Weye~h;:c.;>::r Wa? and .'C,!reel In!e~secuon .~ O; I 2 05 5 0 I g O [ ')~l} I N: -X 4:04 Th~s project is funded for Design, ROW and J:llj.qO;elllel::~: Construction. ConsuJtant is Transpo Group currentJy working on project final design. Project ] /)~ .:,.'.. itol~. ,:.d { ;,~;.wrm,',',,. construction Ad date is estimated to be FebruaryJ ~ Wcyerh.~eu.~'~ } 2004 K:\CIP\2003 Street\STR0703.doc 07/14/2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Meadowlane One Final Plat, File No. 03-100878-00-SU CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [--] ORDINANCE ~] RESOLUTION [-] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [~ OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $0 Expenditure Amt.: $0 Contingency Req'd: Snone ATTACHMENTS: June 30, 2003, staff report with attachments to City Council/Land Use Transportation Committee, including draft Final Plat Resolution. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted a request for final plat approval for the 10 lot Meadowlane One subdivision. The Federal Way City Council approved the Meadowlane preliminary plat on February 6, 2001. The City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) reviewed the final plat application at their July 7, 2003, meeting. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: TheLUTC voted to recommend approval of the Meadowlane One final plat application to the full City Council. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Resolution approving the final Plat of Meadowlane One." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) , COUNCIL ACTION: [--] APPROVED [] DENIED ~] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [~ MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) REVISED - 05/10/2001 COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # Doc ID 23828 CITY OF ~ Federal Way MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: June 30,2003 Eric Faison, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee ~Ma~vi!~~tr~~ p p ii c at ion Federal Way File #03-100878-00-SU STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Land Use/Transportation Committee forward to the City Council a recommendation approving the Meadowlane One Final Plat Resolution. II. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION/EXHIBITS This application requests final plat approval for Meadowlane One, a subdivision often single-family lots on 2.6 acres. The Federal Way City Council granted preliminary plat approval for the ten lot residential subdivision on February 6, 2001. The Meadowlane One subdivision is located along the east side of 35th Avenue SW, between the 34400 and 34300 blocks. Zoning for the site at the time of application was, and continues to be, Residential Single-Family (RS 7.2). Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 20-136, the City Council may approve the final plat application only if all criteria of FWCC Section 20-136(b) are met. Findings and conclusions contained in the staff report to the City Council and referenced in the resolution indicate that the application is consistent with these criteria. III. REASON FOR COUNCIL ACTION The final decision for final plats rest with the City Council in accordance with FWCC Section 20- 136(b). Bringing this matter before the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee for review and recommendation prior to the full Council is consistent with how land use matters are currently processed by the City. IV. PROPOSED MOTION I move that the Land Use/Transportation Committee forward to the City Council, and place on the ~ 2003, City Council consent agenda, a recommendation approving the Meadowlane One Final Plat Resolution. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION EricelSaison - (~hair .' · Meadowlane One Final Plat Land Use/Transportation Committee Memo File #03-100878-00-SU / mc m 23367 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF MEADOWLANE ONE, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, FILE NO. 03- 100878-00-SU WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Meadowlane One, City of Federal Way File No. SUB96-0004, was approved subject to conditions on February 6, 2001, by Federal Way City Council Resolution No. 01-334; and WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfied all of the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 01-334 and in the December 19, 2000, Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted the application for final plat for Meadowlane One within the required time of receiving approval for the above-referenced preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the.City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services and Pubhc Works Department staffhave reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Federal Way Hearing Examiner, and their analysis and conclusions are set forth in the June 30, 2003, Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee considered the application and staffreport for the Meadowlane One final plat at its July 7, 2003, meeting and recommended approval by the full City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the Staff Report and the application for final plat for Meadowlane One during the Council's July 15, 2003, meeting; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. 1. The final plat for Meadowlane One, City of Federal Way File No. 03-100878-00-SU, is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat and is in conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was deemed complete. Res #__, Page 1 File #03-100878-00-SU / boo tD 23368 2. Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report, which are adopted herein by reference, and on the City Council's review of the application for final plat, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provision for public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, play grounds, and schools and school grounds as are required by City Code, or which are necessary and appropriate, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. 3. The public use and interest will be served by the final plat approval granted herein. 4. All conditions listed in the Federal Way Resolution No. 01-334 and the conditions listed in the December 19, 2000, Recommendation of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner, have been satisfied, and/or satisfaction of the conditions have been sufficiently guaranteed by the applicant as allowed by Federal Way City Code Section 20-135. 5. All required improvements have been made and/or sufficient bond, cash deposit, or assignment of funds have been accepted as a guaranty for completion and maintenance of all required plat improvements, as identified in the June 30, 2003, Staff Report. 6. All taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid or will be paid, prior to recording the final plat. Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the Findings and Conclusions contained in Section 1 above, the final plat of Meadowlane One, City of Federal Way File No. 03-100878-00-SU, is approved subject to satisfaction of compliance with plat conditions and conditions required by the Public Works Director as identified in the Staff Report and as required by applicable codes and policies. Section 3. Recording. The approved and signed final plat, together with all legal instruments pertaining thereto as required pursuant to all applicable codes, shall be recorded by the applicant in the King County Department of Records. The applicant shall pay all recording fees. Res # , Page 2 File #03-100878-00-SU / r)oc m 23368 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority, and prior to the effective date, of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this day of ., 2003. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ATTEST: Mayor, Jeanne Burbidge City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO: Res #__, Page 3 File #03-100878-00-SU / oo~ Io 23368 CITY OF ~ Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL MEADOWLANE ONE FINAL PLAT File No. 03-100878-00-SU ge RECOMMENDATION City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the final plat of Meadowlane One for compliance with preliminary plat conditions and all applicable codes and policies, and recommends approval of the final plat application. II. INTRODUCTION Date: June 30, 2003 Request: Request for final plat approval for Meadowlane One Subdivision Description: Meadowlane One is a proposed subdivision of ten single-family lots on approximately 2.6 acres. The ten lot Meadowlane One Preliminary Plat was granted approval by the Federal Way City Council on February 6, 2001, per City Council Resolution 01-334. Access to Meadowlane One is from SW 343rd Street, which is a new local access road off 35th Avenue SW. All required roads, sidewalks, storm drainage facilities, sewer lines, water lines, and related improvements have been constructed or are financially guaranteed. Owner: Robert Hanson 216 Puyallup Avenue # 168 Tacoma, WA 98421 Surveyor: Dryco Surveying, Inc., 253 826-0300 12714 Valley Avenue East Sumner, WA 98390 Location: Sewage Disposal: Generally along the east side of 3 5th Avenue SW at 343rd Street SW. In the NW ¼ of Section 24, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, W:M, King County (Exhibit A - Vicinity Map). Lakehaven Utility District Water Supply: Tacoma Water Fire District: School District: Report Prepared By: King County District No. 39 Federal Way Public Schools, No. 210 Jim Harris, Senior Planner III. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND Meadowlane One is a proposed subdivision including ten single-family lots on approximately 2.6 acres (Exhibit B - Final Plat Map). A proposed resolution of the City of Federal Way, Washington, to approve the final plat of Meadowlane One is attached (Exhibit C - Meadowlane One Final Plat Resolution). The ten lot Meadowlane One Preliminary Plat was granted approval by the Federal Way City Council on February 6, 2001, per City Council Resolution 01-334 (Exhibit D - Preliminary Plat Map and Exhibit E - Resolution 01-334). Zoning for the 2.6 acre site is Single-Family Residential (RS) 7.2, requiring a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. Lot sizes on the Meadowlane One Final Plat range from 7,200 to 22,414 square feet, with nine of the proposed lots being just over 7,200 square feet and one lot comprising approximately ½ acre. The owner applied for final plat approval on March 3, 2003. Improvements installed under EN file number 01-102465-00-EN are now substantially complete. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.110 and Section 20-136 of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC), the City Council is charged with determining whether: 1) the proposed final plat conforms to all terms of the preliminary plat approval; 2) if the subdivision meets the requirements of all applicable state laws and local ordinances that were in effect at the time of preliminary plat approval; 3) if all taxes and assessments owing on the property have been paid; and 4) if all required improvements have been made or sufficient security has been accepted by the City. City of Federal Way staff has reviewed the Meadowlane One Final Plat for compliance with preliminary plat conditions and all applicable codes and policies. All applicable codes, policies, and plat conditions have been met or are financially secured as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135. A proposed resolution of the City of Federal Way, Washington to approve the final plat of Meadowlane One is attached (Exhibit C). IV. COMPLIANCE WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONS The following lists conditions of preliminary plat approval in the same order referenced in Federal Way City Council Resolution 01-334. No SEPA mitigation measures were required for the proposal. Required improvements have been substantially completed or are financially secured as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135. Prior to final plat approval, signage shall be installed on the temporary cul-de-sac barricade as required by the Public Works Director. The signage shall be a minimum size of three feet by three feet, with three-inch letters, and state, "This street is planned for future extension. For further information contact the City of Federal Way Public Works Department at 253-661-4131 ." Meadowlane One Final Plat File #03- 100878-00-SU / voc ii> 23366 Staff Report Page 2 o ° o ° Staff Response: This condition has been met. The required sign has been installed. As required by the Public Works Director, a note shall be included on the final plat to the following effect, "Lots 1 - 5 must access from interior plat streets, and lots 6 - 9 must access from the private access tract." Staff Response: This condition has been met. Note number four on the final plat implements this condition of preliminary plat approval. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall install signage as required by the Public Works Director and Fire Department to assure the temporary cul-de-sac is maintained in an accessible manner at all times. A note shall also be made on the final plat map, clearly indicating the temporary cul-de-sac bulb is to be accessible for turn-around at all times. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The required sign has been installed and note five on the final plat discusses keeping the cul-de-sac accessible. The final plat map shall include language as required by the Public Works Director and Community Development Director, identifying provisions for release of the temporary turn-around easement and removal of the temporary cul-de-sac bulb upon future extension of the roadway. The temporary easement should be worded to release automatically upon future extension, and future development would be responsible for removal, replacement, and repair of the temporary bulb and associated sidewalks as applicable. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Note number five on the final plat map implements this condition. Private utility service lines are not permitted across the public water quality tract, unless approved by the Public Works Director. Staff Response: This condition has been met. There are private utility easements at both ends of the stormwater quality tract. However, the private utility lines within the stormwater quality tract do not affect the function of the water quality treatment. The engineering plans for the project were reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Prior to final plat approval, all utilitypoles required, or proposed to be relocated, must be outside of any sidewalk, as required by the Public Works Director. Staff Response: This condition has been met. None of the existing utility poles along the project frontage were required to be moved or relocated. Therefore, the sidewalk meanders around several existing utility poles and one pole is located within a widened sidewalk section that provides the required six-foot sidewalk width. The engineering plans for the project were reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. All streets shall have a minimum pavement section of three inches Class B asphalt over six inches of crushed surfacing to support the traffic loads, as required by the Public Works Director. Meadowlane One Final Plat File #03-100878-00-SU / ~o¢ ~) 23366 Staff Report Page 3 Staff Response: This condition has been met. The pavement meets the required section and was reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department during the engineering plan review and approval. As required by the Public Works Director, in order to install code required street frontage improvements, right-of-way dedication is required on the northeast corner of SW 344th Street and 35th Avenue SW to accommodate the sidewalk radius. Staff Response: This condition has been met. Right-of-way dedication at the comer of SW 344th Street and 35th Avenue SW is shown on the final plat map and in a separate deed to be recorded. The offset at the intersection of SW 343rd Street must be minimized to the maximum extent possible, as required by the Public Works Director. Staff Response: This condition has been met. The minor offset at the intersection was reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department during the engineering plan review and approval. V. DECISIONAL CRITERIA Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-136, if the City Council finds that the following criteria have been met, the City Council may approve the final plat for recording. 1. The final plat is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat. Staff Response: This criterion has been met, as the conditions of preliminary plat have been met or are financially guaranteed, and the final plat is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat. 2. The final plat is in conformity with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls. Staff Response: This criterion has been met and/or is financially guaranteed. The plat meets the zoning standards for the RS 7.2 zoning district. Pursuant to FWCC Section 20-155, the applicant has opted to make an open space fee-in-lieu of providing on-site open space. As provided in FWCC Section 20-135, performance and maintenance bonds are in place for completion of any outstanding improvements. Infrastructure improvements are substantially complete except the streetlights along the project frontage have not yet been installed, and must be completed within six months of final plat approval. 3. That all conditions of the Hearing Examiner and/or City Council have been satisfied. Staff Response: This criterion has been met as noted in the staff comments above. All plat conditions have been met and/or are financially guaranteed to be completed within six months of final plat approval. All life safety improvements have been completed. That the public use and interest shall be served by the establishment of the subdivision and dedication by determining if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety, general welfare, open space, drainage ways, streets and roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and shall consider all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school. Meadowlane One Final Plat File #03-100878-00-SU / mc i~) 23366 Staff Report Page 4 o Staff Response: This criterion has been met. The final plat is consistent with applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and ensures the public health, safety, and welfare is protected. The plat infrastructure has been installed and/or adequately financially guaranteed as discussed above, including: safe walking routes to school; open space fee-in-lieu payment; drainage system installation; water system installation; sewer system installation; and street improvements. That all required improvements have been made and maintenance bonds or other security for such improvements have been submitted and accepted. Staff Response: This criterion has been met. All road and storm drainage improvements for Meadowlane One have been constructed and/or are financially guaranteed. The street improvements are complete, with the exception of the street lighting along 35th Avenue SW. The financial guarantees on file with the City will assure completion of the streetlights within six months of final plat approval. In addition, all water lines have been installed and approved by Tacoma Water as identified in the October 15, 2002, Project Completion Checklist. Sewer lines have been installed and approved by Lakehaven Utility District as identified in the June 30, 2003, letter of substantial completion from Lakehaven Utility District. 6. That all taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid. Staff Response: Prior to being recorded, the plat is reviewed by the King County Department of Assessments to ensure that all taxes and assessments have been paid. VII. CONCLUSION Based on site visits, review of the final plat maps, construction drawings, and the project file, staff has determined that the application for final plat approval for Meadowlane One meets all platting requirements of RCW 58.17.110 and FWCC Section 20-136. Plat infrastructure improvements have been substantially completed and/or financial guarantees have been provided to assure completion of plat conditions within six months of final plat approval as allowed by FWCC Section 20-135. The project has been developed in conformance with Resolution 01-334. A recommendation of final plat approval is therefore being forwarded to the City Council for your approval. VII. EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Vicinity Map for Meadowlane One 81/2 x 11 Reduced Copy of Meadowlane One Final Plat Map Final Plat Resolution of the City of Federal Way, Washington, Approving the Meadowlane One Final Plat 8½ x 11 Reduced Copy of Approved Meadowlane One Preliminary Plat Resolution 01-334 - February 6, 2001, City of Federal Way Preliminary Plat Approval of Meadowlane Meadowlane One Final Plat File #03-100878-00-SU / mc u)23366 Staff Report Page 5 4 SW 555TH SW 340TH ISITE I SW $47TH ST. SW Vi CI N.ITY MAP NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT A Meadowlane One A Portion of the ~outh~e~t ~uorter o~ the North~e~ Section 24, To~n~hlp =1 North, ~nge HIIl~me~e ~erldl~n, CI~ o~ Federal ~, Kin9 Ooun~, Cily of Federal Way File No. 03-100~78-~-$u LEGAL DESCRIPTION DEDICATION ALL PUBUC PURPOSES NOT ~CONSISTENT WffH ~14E USE )HER/OF FOR PUBUC ENITiY ~ AN0 FOR )HE pURPOSE S-fATED. to me know~ to be the PrefltdenL of Touchstone Homea, Inc. that executed the foPegotng tnatrument eno acknowledged APPROVALS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT h file UNDERSIGH£D DIR£CTOR COMMUNtTf DEVELOP~,(EHT, HERESY CERflR' '[HAT THIS FIHAL PLAT CONFORMS FULLY WI]ti ALE APPLICABLE R£CULAT'ONS AND SfN4DARDS OF MY DEPAR1UENf. ...................................... DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS I. THE UHOERSIGNED DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. HEREBY CERTIFY OIR£CTOR DATE FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY MANAGER. FINANCE DIVISION 0£PUIY KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS PArce~ i 536020 0005 ex~.,~e v -aT~- ~'P-EO~.~ ~- i~ -Ee~2 ~ FE~ ........ ON THIS ..... Oaf OF ........... 2003 KIflC COUNTY ASSESSORKING COUNTY DEPUTY ASSESSOR SW 5.36th St. RECORDING CERIlFICATE SUPER~OEIJOEhl 0¢ R£CO4~J)S EXHIBIT_ , ~',~' ':.: GY I HEREaY CErTiFY l~t O.~l ~GEt~ P.L.S. DRYCO 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST "~~'~* ! SUMNER, WA 98390 ~ ,/,,/~.~ I I Vol/Poge ,~.0 Meadowlane One ~c~lon 24, To~n~hl~ 21 Nor[h, ~n~e B E~,~ ' I ~ ~',~'%o~ ~ ~lll~me~e Meridian, CI[~ o~ Federal ~, Kln~ Coun[~, ~shln~Lon Street ~'~ ~ ' ' ~ ..... 7' i ~ ~ ~ ~ __ ~ SW 345(d STREET Im~ I r~4 O x ~ ~ ~. F~ ~6~ USE. THE )E~PO~Y C~-~-~ ~SEMENT SH~ ~ )~ -I (34213) ~ ~[ ~ ~ ENO OF 34th A~NUE SW THE O~4ERS ~ LOIS 1 · 2 S~L ~ m~ I ~' ~ '1 ~ ~ ' RESPONSI~ FOR T~ ~TEI~CE T~REOF. ]H~S TURN~OU~ ~ q ~ 'm (a~) ~ J ~ ~ ' 0 ~ _1 ~4~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ S F~fing ~ GR~S[~NT[. OMSI~ 2, ~N 9408510324. ANO THE 8~mGS ~ LO~ 5 I ~J LOt 4l~) A~NUE SW EL~=428.68 ', ~ 34 r ~r 7. IHE BUJLD[NG S~CK UNES ~4 CORHER LOTS t~VE 8SEN SHOW~ Cl~ COOS. S/CT~ 22-1 (DEFINITIONS: PROPER~ LINE) TfJE PROtIT REFERENCE SURVEY I ~' ~' L at~' EOUIP~ENT · METHODOLOGY ~ I~ ~ Et ~l I~ ~ Ft ~l ~NST OT~R SU~S OF RECORD. r . ~ .~ ~ Lot 3 5422g 34[h Av,n. SW - - --- - ~ ~ ~ ........ ~ - T~ ~ ~ ~,,,. ,~,, ~ o ~o ~o ~o RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF MEADOWLANE ONE, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, FILE NO. 03-100878-00-SU WHEREAS, the preliminary plat for Meadowlane One, City of Federal Way File No. SUB96-0004, was approved subject to conditions on February 6, 2001, by Federal Way City Council Resolution No. 01-334; and WHEREAS, the applicant has satisfied all of the conditions set forth in Resolution No. 01-334 and in the December 19, 2000, Recommendation of the Federal Way Hearing Examiner; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted the application for final plat for Meadowlane One within the required time of receiving approval for the above-referenced preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services and Public Works Department staff have reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the conditions of preliminary plat approval and the Federal Way Hearing Examiner, and their analysis and conclusions are set forth in the June 30, 2003, Staff Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council Land Use/Transportation Committee considered the application and staff report for the Meadowlane One final plat at its July 7, 2003, meeting and recommended approval by the full City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the StaffReport and the application for final plat for Meadowlane One during the Council's July 15, 2003, meeting; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings and Conclusions. 1. The final plat for Meadowlane One, City of Federal Way File No. 03-100878~00-SU, is in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat and is in conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or other land use controls in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was deemed complete. Res # , Page 1 EXHIBIT C PAGE., i OF,, B r ne #03-100878-00-SU / Do~ ID 23368 2. Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report, which are adopted herein by reference, and on the City Council's review of the application for final plat, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provision for public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, play grounds, and schools and school grounds as are required by City Code, or which are necessary and appropriate, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. 3. The public use and interest will be served by the final plat approval granted herein. 4. All conditions listed in the Federal Way Resolution No. 01-334 and the conditions listed in the December 19, 2000, Recommendation of the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner, have been satisfied, and/or satisfaction of the conditions have been sufficiently guaranteed by the applicant as allowed by Federal Way City Code Section 20-135. 5. All required improvements have been made and/or sufficient bond, cash deposit, or assignment of funds have been accepted as a guaranty for completion and maintenance of all required plat improvements, as identified in the June 30, 2003, Staff Report. 6. All taxes and assessments owing on the property being subdivided have been paid or will be paid, prior to recording the final plat. Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the Findings and Conclusions contained in Section 1 above, the final plat of Meadowlane One, City of Federal Way File No. 03-100878-00-SU, is approved subject to satisfaction of compliance with plat conditions and conditions required by the Public Works Director as identified in the Staff Report and as required by applicable codes and policies. Section 3. Recording. The approved and signed final plat, together with all legal instruments pertaining thereto as required pursuant to all applicable codes, shall be recorded by the applicant in the King County Department of Records. The applicant shall pay all recording fees. EXHIBIT,. , Res #__, Page 2 PAGE OF 3 Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority, and prior to the effective date, of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this day of ,2003. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ATYEST: Mayor, Jeanne Burbidge City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO: EXHIBIT PAGE OF_ Res # , Page 3 File #03-100878-00-SU / Doc ID 23368 IviEADO WLANE PLA1- PRELIMINARY PLAT IIt~~.,~, EXHIBIT_ ¢ - ~nc ~ OF t RESOLUTION NO. 01-334 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MEADOWLANE, FEDERAL WAY FILE NO. SUB96-0004. WHEREAS, the applicant Ed Flanigan, applied to the City of Federal Way for preliminaryplat approval to subdivide certain real property known as Meadowlane and consistingofapproximately2.6 acres into ten (10) single family residential lots located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Southwest 344th Street and 35~ Avenue Southwest; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2000, an Environmental Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the Director of Federal Way's Department of Community Development .Services pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21 C; and WHEREAS, no comments or appeals on the DNS were submitted to the Department of Community Development Services; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner on December 5, 2000, held a public hearing concerning the Meadowlane preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing, on December 18, 2000, the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner issued a written Report and Recommendation containing findings, conclusions, and recommending approval of the prelimihary plat of Meadowlane subject to conditions set forth therein; and WHEREAS, On January 22, 2001 the City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee considered the record and the Hearing Examiner recommendation and voted to forward a recommendation for approval of the proposed Meadowlane preliminary plat to the full City Council, with no changes to the Hearing Examiner recommendation; and Resolution No. 01-33/4., Page # 1 EXHIBIT WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council has jurisdiction and authority pursuant to Section 20-127 of the Federal Way City Code to approve, deny, or modify a preliminary plat and/or its conditions; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2001, the City Council considered the written record and the Report and Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner on the Meadowlane preliminary plat, pursuant to Chapter 20 of Federal Way City Code, Chapter 58.17 RCW, and ali other applicable City Codes; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption of Findings of Fact and Conclusions. 1. The findings of fact and conclusions 'of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, are hereby adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Federal Way city Council. Any finding deemed to be a conclusion, and any conclusion deemed to be a finding, shall be treated as such. 2. . Based on, inter alia, the analysis and conclusions in the Staff Report and Hearing Examiner's recommendation, and conditions of approval as established therein, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare, and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary waste, parks and recreation, play grounds, schools and schools grounds, and all other relevant facts as are required by City Code and state law, and provides for sidewalks and other planning features to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. 3. herein. The public use and interest will be served by the preliminary plat approval granted EXHIBIT - PAGE OF .... Resolution No. 01-33/4., Page #2 Section 2. Application Approval. Based upon the recommendationofthe Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner and findings and conclusions contained therein as adopted by the City Council immediately above, the preliminary plat of Meadowlane, Federal Way File No. SUB96-0004, is hereby approved, subject to conditions as contained in the Recommendation of the Federal Way Land Use Hearing Examiner dated December 18, 2000 (Exhibit A). Section 3. Conditions of Approval Integral The conditionsofapproval of the preliminaryplat are all integral to each other with respect to the City Council finding that the public use and interest will be served by the platting or subdivision of the subject property. Should any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter declare any of the conditions invalid, then, in said event, the proposed preliminary plat approval granted in this resolution shall be deemed void and the preliminary plat shall be remanded to the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner to review the impacts of the invalidation of any condition or conditions and conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure that the proposed plat makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare and other factors as required by RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable City ordinances, rules, and regulations, and forward such recommendation to the City Council for further action. Section 4. Severabili .ty. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolutionshould be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Resolution No. 01-33/4 ., Page//3 EXHIBIT- Lc"- _ Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, THIS 6rI~DAYOF February ,200I. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY A~'TEST: /~ / ~ii¥ ~;LEmq N. Cums~rINE GI;,EEN, CM"'¢ v APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, BOB C. STERBANK FILED WITH THE CITY CLERIC: 01/30/01 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 02/06/01 RESOLUTION NO. 01-336 Docum~tlO #13128 Resolution No. 01-336, Page #4 EXHIBIT PAGE_. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Interagency Agreement between State of Washington, Washington State Patrol, and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety for Narcotics Canine Team Training CATEGORY: X CONSENT [] RESOLUTION [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] ORDINANCE [] PUBLIC HEARING BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: Interagency Agreement between State of Washington, Washington State Patrol, and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety for Narcotics Canine Team Training, and the PRHS & PS Committee memo on the Interagency Agreement. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: · To train the narcotics canine team to meet Criminal Justice Training Commission standards in order to provide additional narcotics canine law enforcement resources in the Puget Sound area. The City is responsible for all costs associated with the care and upkeep of the canine, and for lodging and subsistence costs of the Canine Handler should he/she elect to eat meals and/or lodge at the WSP Academy during this training. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On July 14, 2003, the PRHS & PS Committe approved the Interagency Agreement between State of Washington, Washington State Patrol, and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety for Narcotics Canine Team Training, and recommended that the Agreement be send to Council for consideration on August 5, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the Interagency Agreement between State of Washington, Washington State Patrol, and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety for Narcotics Canine Team Training. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.C City of Federal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July 14, 2003 Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Anne E. Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police ~f ~ David M~~. nger Interagency Agreement between State of Washington, Washington State Patrol, and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety for Narcotics Canine Team Training Backeround: To train narcotics canine team to meet Criminal Justice Training Commission standards in order to provide additional narcotics canine law enforcement resources in the Puget Sound area. The training will allow the Canine Handler and the narcotic detection canine to meet minimum CJTC training standards as set forth in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 139-05-915, and be eligible to successfully participate in a CJTC narcotic canine certification. Start-up Costs: The City is responsible for all costs associated with the care and upkeep of the canine, and for lodging and subsistence costs of the Canine Handler should he/she elect to eat meals and/or lodge at the WSP Academy during this training. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept this request for an Interagency Agreement between State of Washington, Washington State Patrol, and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety for Narcotics Canine Team Training, and forward to full Council for consideration at its ~ 2003. :APPR?VAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: mittee Chair Con~mittee Member Committee Member · WSP No. C040068GSC INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PATROL AND CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY THIS AGREEMENT, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, is made and entered into by and between the Washington State Patrol, hereinafter referred to as '¥VSP," and the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety, hereinafter referred to as "City." IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT to train a narcotics canine team to meet Criminal Justice Training Commission standards in order to provide additional narcotics canine law enforcement resources in the Puget Sound area. IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: STATEMENT OF WORK WSP will provide a minimum of 200 hours of narcotic canine training for one City narcotics canine team in accordance with WAC 139-05-915. The majority of the training will be conducted at the WSP Academy in Shelton. The City shall designate a commissioned law enforcement officer to train as a canine handler (Canine Handler). WSP shall train the Canine Handler prior to this training on how to select a canine; the Canine Handler is responsible for locating a canine candidate prior to the class. The WSP will retain the authority to determine, at its sole discretion, whether a canine is unfit for further training after the canine's acceptance into the program. In the event a canine is unable to complete the training, a replacement canine, if available, will be assigned. WSP is not responsible for the selection or provision of a replacement canine. WSP will work with the Canine Handler to ensure every opportunity is afforded to ensure successful completion of the training. However, the WSP may determine, at its sole discretion, that the Canine Handler selected by the City does not display the aptitude necessary for the canine training program. Through the course of training, the City is responsible for all costs associated with the care and upkeep of the canine, and for lodging and subsistence costs of the Canine Handler should he/she elect to eat meals and/or lodge at the WSP Academy during this training. Upon completion of the training the Canine Handler and the narcotic detection canine will have met minimum Criminal Justice Training Center (CJTC) training standards as set forth in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 139-05-915, "Requirements of training for law enforcement and corrections dog handlers and certification of canine teams" and be eligible to successfully participate in a CJTC narcotic canine certification. Page 1 of 3 INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL AND CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (continued) PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE Subject to its other provisions, the period of performance of this Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2003, and be completed on September 5, 2003 unless terminated sooner as provided herein. The training period will be from July 14, 2003 through September 5, 2003, with a one-week intermission during the week of August 4, 2003. Training will be conducted four days a week. It is anticipated that the Canine Handler will accrue 30 hours per workweek of training with an additional 10 hours being dedicated to commute time. This will result in approximately 210 hours of canine specific training time. GENERAL PROVISIONS WSP staff providing services under the terms of this Agreement shall be under the direct command and control of the Chief of WSP or designee and shall perform the duties required by this Agreement in a manner consistent with WSP policy and regulations, applicable state and local laws, and the Constitutions of the State of Washington and the United States. The assignment of personnel to accomplish the purpose of this Agreement shall be at the discretion of the Chief of WSP or designee. NONDISCRIMINATION In the performance of this Agreement, both parties shall comply with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 200d); Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 794); Chapter 49.60 Revised Code of Washington; and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC 12111-12117), as now or hereafter amended. Both parties shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, marital status, age, creed, Vietnam-era and disabled status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap. AGREEMENT MANAGEMENT The work described herein shall be performed under the coordination of Commander Steve Neal of the City, and Lieutenant Ron Holstrom of WSP, or their successors. They shall provide assistance and guidance to the other party necessary for the performance of this Agreement. INDEMNIFICATION Each party shall defend, protect and hold harmless the other party from and against all claims, suits and/or actions arising from any negligent or intentional act or omission of that party's employees, agents, and/or authorized subcontractor(s) while performing this Agreement. AGREEMENT ALTERATIONS AND AMENDMENTS This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties. TERMINATION Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days' written notification to the other party. If this Agreement is so terminated, the terminating party shall be liable only for performance in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for performance prior to the effective date of termination. Page 2 of 3 INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON STATE PATROL AND CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (continued) SAVINGS In the event funding from state, federal or other sources is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way after the effective date of this Agreement and pdor to normal completion, WSP may terminate the Agreement under the Termination clause, subject to renegotiation under those new funding limitations and conditions. DISPUTES In the event that a dispute arises under this Agreement, it shall be determined in the following manner: The Chief of WSP shall appoint one member to the Dispute Board. The City shall appoint one member to the Dispute Board. The Chief of WSP and the City shall jointly appoint an additional member to the Dispute Board. The Dispute Board shall evaluate the dispute and make a determination of the dispute. The determination of the Dispute Board shall be final and binding on the parties hereto. If applicable and as an alternative to this process, either of the parties may request intervention by the Governor, as provided by RCW 43.17.330, in which event the Governor's process will control. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE In the event of any inconsistency in the terms of this Agreement, unless otherwise provided herein, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: 1. Applicable federal and state statutes and regulations; 2. Special Terms and Conditions contained in the Statement of Work 3. General Terms and Conditions contained in this Agreement 4. Any other provisions of the Agreement, whether incorporated by reference or otherwise. ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement. State of Washington Washington State Patrol City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety Ronal W. Serpas, Chief Signature Date Date Budget and Fiscal Services Date APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 2/12/02 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: MOU between Bellevue Police Dept., Federal Way Dept. of Public Safety, Kirkland Police Dept., Tacoma Police Dept., and Washington State Patrol to provide framework for the use of HGI Stinger- equipped Bait Vehicles by the parties of this MOU CATEGORY: X CONSENT [] RESOLUTION [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] ORDINANCE [] PUBLIC HEARING [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: The MOU between Bellevue Police Dept., Federal Way Dept. of Public Safety, Kirkland Police Dept., Tacoma Police Dept., and Washington State Patrol to provide framework for the use of HGI Stinger-equipped Bait Vehicles by the parties of this MOU, and the PRHS&PS memo requesting Council consideration on the MOU. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: HGI Stinger allows law enforcement agencies to track, locate and immobilize Bait Vehicles used during covert auto theft operations. The parties of this MOU are responsible for installing and maintaining their own Stinger equipment and Bait Vehicles. WSP will maintain the operating server and associated software. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On July 14, 2003 the PRHS & PS Committee approved the MOU between Bellevue Police Dept., Federal Way Dept. of Public Safety, Kirkland Police Dept., Tacoma Police Dept., and Washington State Patrol, and recommended that the MOU be sent to Council for consideration on August 5, 2003 PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the MOU between Bellevue Police Dept., Federal Way Dept. of Public Safety, Kirkland Police Dept., Tacoma Police Dept., and Washington State Patrol. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.D City of Federal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July 14, 2003 Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Anne E. Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police ~ David Monger MOU between Bellevue Police Dept., Federal Way Dept. of Public Safety, Kirkland Police Dept., Tacoma Police Dept., and Washington State Patrol to provide framework for the use of HGI Stinger-equipped Bait Vehicles by the parties of this MOU Background: HGI Stinger allows law enforcement agencies to track, locate and immobilize Bait Vehicles used during covert auto theft operations. When activated by movement or otherwise, the Bait Vehicle will send a message to a server located at WSP's Tacoma/Olympia Communications Center. At that time, WSP will contact the Bait Vehicle User Agency, and assist them in tracking and locating the Bait Vehicle. When authorized the WSP Communications Center can send a signal to the Bait Vehicle to interrupt the ignition system and immobilize the vehicle in order to allow auto theft suspect apprehension. Start-up Costs: The parties of this MOU are responsible for installing and maintaining their own Stinger equipment and Bait Vehicles. WSP will maintain the operating server and associated software. Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept this request for a MOU between Bellevue Police Dept., Federal Way Dept. of Public Safety, Kirkland Police Dept., Tacoma Police Dept., and Washington State Patrol, and forward to full Council for consideration at its Jxtt3'-~, 2003. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: c~c~thmittee Chair Col~mittee Member Committee Member MEMORANDUM Of UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN BELLEVUE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, KIRKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, TACOMA POLICE DEPARTMENT AND WASHINGTON STATE PATROL WSP No. C040076GSC This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), pursuant to Chapter 10.93 RCW (Washington Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act) and Chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act), is made and entered into by and between the Bellevue Police Department; the Federal Way Department of Public Safety; the Kirkland Police Department; the Tacoma Police Department; and the Washington State Patrol (WSP). The purpose of this MOU is to provide a framework for the use of HGI Stinger-equipped Bait Vehicles (Bait Vehicles) by the parties to this MOU. Introduction. HGI Stinger allows law enforcement agencies to track, locate and immobilize Bait Vehicles used during covert auto theft operations. While using this system, law enforcement officers from agencies participating in this MOU (User Agencies) place Bait Vehicles in likely auto theft locations. When activated by movement or otherwise, the Bait Vehicle will send a message to a server located at WSP's Tacoma/Olympia Communications Center. The WSP Communications Center will then contact the Bait Vehicle User Agency, and assist that agency in tracking and locating the Bait Vehicle. If authorized by the User Agency or some other law enforcement agency with direct line- of-sight to the Bait Vehicle, the WSP Communications Center may also send a signal to the Bait Vehicle to interrupt the Bait Vehicle's ignition system and immobilize the vehicle in order to allow auto theft suspect apprehension. 2. Scope of Work. The parties to this MOU agree to the following: 2.1 Definitions WSP Coordinator:. WSP shall provide a Bait Vehicle coordinator (WSP Coordinator) to coordinate the use of Bait Vehicles by the parties to this MOU. The purpose of the WSP Coordinator is to ensure that Bait Vehicles are deployed according to this MOU; the WSP Coordinator shall also ensure that the number of Bait Vehicles deployed will not interfere with the normal operations of the WSP Communications Center. Primary Officer. The User Agency primary contact that oversees the deployment of the Bait Vehicle and ideally is the closest officer to the stolen Bait Vehicle when initiating the stop and apprehension. Secondary Officer. The User Agency alternate contact that works with the Primary Officer during Bait Vehicle deployment and when initiating the stop and apprehension. User Agency: The party to this MOU that deploys and recovers Bait Vehicles according to the terms of this MOU. Page 1 of 6 MEMORANDUM Of UNDERSTANDING STINGER-EQUIPPED BAIT VEHICLES 2.2 Sequence of Events 2.2.1. Pre-Deployment. User Agencies must contact the WSP Coordinator prior to Bait Vehicle deployment to ensure that the number of Bait Vehicles deployed at any one time will not exceed WSP Communications Center capabilities. The User Agency must also provide a Primary Officer and Seconary Officer/alternate contact for the User Agency that will be contacted by WSP Communications Center if the Bait Vehicle alarm system is activated. The User Agency shall ensure that the Bait Vehicle and associated on-board Stinger equipment is functioning properly prior to Bait Vehicle deployment. 2.2.2. Dep/oyment. The Primary Officer shall provide to the WSP Communications Center the following information immediately after the Bait Vehicle is deployed and armed: · Specific Bait Vehicle identifying information · Location of deployed Bait Vehicle · Primary Officer and Secondary Officer/alternate user contact information The WSP Communications Center shall inform the Primary Officer or alternate whenever a Iow battery voltage message is received from the Bait Vehicle. 2.2.3. Alarm Activation. The WSP Communications Center shall inform the Primary Officer of Bait Vehicle alarm activation, including the type of activation and other Bait Vehicle information as possible. Other law enforcement agencies shall not respond to Bait Vehicle alarm activation unless requested by the User Agency. The WSP Communications Center shall notify other law enforcement agencies as appropriate, and shall continue to monitor the Bait Vehicle until advised otherwise by the User contact, the Primary Officer, or the WSP Coordinator. If the Bait Vehicle remains stationary after alarm activation, the User Agency (preferably the Primary Officer and Secondary Officer) shall survey the Bait Vehicle location to determine the cause of the alarm. The User Agency shall advise the WSP Communications Center of when this survey begins, when the User Agency clears the Bait Vehicle location, and when/if the Bait Vehicle has been recovered or redeployed to another location. 2.2.4. Apprehension. The User Agency shall respond to a possible stolen Bait Vehicle according to its own policies and procedures, The Primary Officer may order the VVSP Communications Center to disable the Bait Vehicle's ignition system once the Primary Officer a) maintains direct line-of-sight to the Bait Vehicle; b) can identify the Bait Vehicle visually by license number; and c) determines that the Bait Vehicle can be safely disabled. The Primary Officer's responsibilities under this section may be passed to another law enforcement officer if necessary, however, any law enforcement officer that assumes these responsibilities must be trained in the use of the Stinger system to disable Bait Vehicles according to his/her law enforcement agency's regulations. 2.2.5. Recovery. The User Agency is responsible for the clean up and recovery of its Bait Vehicles regardless of which law enforcement agency apprehended the suspect(s). Page 2 of 6 2.3 2.4 2.5¸ MEMORANDUM Of UNDERSTANDING STINGER-EQUIPPED BAIT VEHICLES Maintenance. The parties to this MOU are responsible for installing and maintaining their own Stinger equipment and Bait Vehicles. WSP shall also be responsible for maintaining and operating the server and associated software located at WSP. Loan of WSP Bait Vehicles. WSP may loan its own Bait Vehicles to other parties to this MOU, however any party using WSP Bait Vehicles shall be responsible for operating costs of the Bait Vehicle and shall follow WSP Bait Vehicle Policy during its use. This policy is attached to this MOU as Exhibit A. Training. Each party to this MOU shall' ensure that any of its officers that deploy, monitor and recover Bait Vehicles have received training from the system vendor on its use, or an equivalent training program that incorporates this information. Likewise, each party to this MOU shall ensure that its law enforcement officers that assume the Primary Officer's responsibility for issuing a disablement command have been trained on safely and effectively stopping Bait Vehicles. Period of Performance. Subject to its other provisions, the period of performance of this MOU shall start on the date of the final signature to this MOU, and shall continue for a period of five (5) years unless terminated sooner as provided herein. Agency Representatives. The following persons or their successors represent the parties in matters involving this MOU: For the Bellevue Police Department: Chief Jim Montgomery PO Box 90012 Bellevue WA 98009 For the Federal Way Department of Public Safety: Director Ann Kirkpatrick 34008 9th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 For the Kirkland Police Department: Chief Stan Aston 123 Fifth Avenue Kirkland WA 98033 For the Washington State Patrol: For the Tacoma Police Department: Lieutenant Anthony Abuan Criminal Investigation Division 930 Tacoma Avenue Tacoma WA 98402 WSP Coordinator: Sergeant Charles H. Akau Tacoma Criminal Investigation Unit Telephone: (253) 536-4371 WSP Tacoma/Olympia Communications Center: Mr. Robert L. Cutcher Telephone (253) 536-6210 Hold Harmless. Each party shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the other parties from and against all claims, suits and/or actions arising from any negligent or intentional act or omission of that party's employees or agents while performing under this MOU. Page 3 of 6 MEMORANDUM Of UNDERSTANDING STINGER-EQUIPPED BAIT VEHICLES Termination. Except as otherwise provided in this MOU, any party may terminate its participation is this MOU upon thirty (30) days' written notification to the other parties. If a party's participation in this MOU is so terminated, the terminating party shall be liable only for performance in accordance with the terms of this MOU for performance prior to the effective date of termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this MOU. For the Bellevue Police Department: For the Federal Way Department of Public Safety: Signature Signature Date Date For the Kirkland Police Department: For the Tacoma Police Department: Signature Signature Date Date For the Washington State Patrol: Ronal W. Serpas, Chief Date Approved as to form: Assistant Attorney General Date Budget and Fiscal Services Date Page 4 of 6 Exhibit A WSP BAIT VEHICLE POLICY A bait vehicle is a specially equipped vehicle used to target and apprehend auto thieves. The Washington State Patrol and other law enforcement agencies have bait vehicles that are monitored by Tacoma Communications. Washington State Patrol bait vehicle(s) shall only be deployed after approval by the Bait Vehicle Coordinator. All personnel using bait vehicle software, responding to bait vehicle calls, and deploying the bait vehicle shall be familiar with bait vehicle policy and procedures and receive training approved by the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) commander. The bait vehicle shall not be used for any other purpose unless approved by the CID commander. Any law enforcement agency requesting to use the agency bait vehicle shall obtain approval from the Bait Vehicle Coordinator and sign a Use Agreement contract with the Washington State Patrol. The contract will require agency bait vehicle policy and procedures to be followed by the agency and all officers who may respond or deploy the bait vehicle. The contract will also require all officers responding to or deploying a bait vehicle to receive training approved by the department prior to deployment. The Bait Vehicle Coordinator is the CID Auto Theft Unit sergeant to whom the bait vehicle is assigned. Bait Vehicle Deployment Bait vehicles should be deployed in areas and at times where auto theft is prevalent. Tacoma Communications shall be advised when any department-monitored bait vehicle is deployed statewide. Communications shall be advised of the location, agency contact (this person shall be available 24 hours a day), bait vehicle information, and any other information required by the Bait Vehicle Coordinator or Communications. Communications shall immediately advise the agency contact person whenever a Iow battery voltage signal is received. Bait Vehicle Activation When a bait vehicle is activated, Communications shall advise the deploying agency contact person, responsible agency communications center, and local patrols when appropriate. The information should include the type of activation, vehicle information, and bait vehicle location and direction of travel. Communications shall monitor the bait vehicle until advised otherwise by the deploying agency contact person, on-duty supervisor, or agency Bait Vehicle Coordinator. Bait Vehicle Response (Not Stolen) Departmental personnel shall not respond to a bait vehicle activation (stolen or not) when the vehicle is deployed by another agency unless requested by that agency. An activated (not stolen) bait vehicle indicates a vehicle's door or trunk has been opened or the ignition has been turned on. At least two officers should respond to this type of call and ensure that no suspects are inside or near the vehicle. Officers shall advise Communications of the disposition of the response to include location, occupants, and any damage to the vehicle observed. Communications shall notify the Bait Vehicle Coordinator. Bait Vehicle Response (Stolen) A stolen bait vehicle shall be treated like any other felony. Two officers shall respond unless a supervisor approves otherwise. The primary officer (officer closest to the vehicle) shall advise Communications of the location and direction of travel when the vehicle is in sight. For the purposes of disabling or engaging special equipment on the bait vehicle, the primary officer Page 5 of 6 MEMORANDUM Of UNDERSTANDING STINGER-EQUIPPED BAIT VEHICLES shall be close enough to accurately determine the identity of the bait vei~icle, its license number, speed, and other circumstances necessary to safely and effectively stop the vehicle. Before an officer decides to disable a bait vehicle, the officer shall consider the following: Roadway type and characteristics Pedestrian traffic Traffic Bridges and overpasses Erratic driving Weapons Other information known to the officer at the time Pursuit, Pursuit Immobilization Technique (PIT), and Use of Force policies shall apply. Officers shall not pursue a bait vehicle unless the bait vehicle equipment is defeated and Communications can no longer track the vehicle. The spike strip and PIT maneuver shall not be used unless the bait vehicle cannot be tracked and the policies governing these procedures are adhered to. Whenever bait vehicle equipment is defeated, the departmental Bait Vehicle Coordinator, deploying agency supervisor, and appropriate law enforcement agency communications shall be advised to locate the vehicle. When the Global Positioning System (GPS)is lost, Communications shall provide responding officers the last known position and other appropriate information. Officers should respond to the last known location and request the horn be activated if appropriate. When a stolen bait vehicle is recovered, it shall not be used again until the mechanical and bait equipment systems have been deemed working properly by the Bait Vehicle Coordinator. Page 6 of 6 MEETING DATE: August 5, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Arts Commission Member Replacement CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [] ORI)INANCE [] ilESOLUTION [] PUBI.1C HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: Expendilure Ami.: Contingency Req'd: ATTACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated July 7, 2003; Arts Commission Member Replacement SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Arts Commission member Joe Martinez has four unexcused absences in 2003. At the July 3, 2003 Arts Commission meeting, the Arts Commission passed a motion to recommend to Council that Joe Martincz be removed from the Commission and alternate member, Ted Nelson be appointed to member status. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENI)A;I'ION: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to remove Arts Commissioner Joe Martinez from the Commission and appoint Ted Nelson as a voting member of the Arts Commission, to fill the unexpired term of Commissioner Joe Martinez through December 31, 2004, and forward to Full Council on August 5, 2003. PI~OPOSEI) MOTION: "1 move approval of the Arts Commission Membcr Replacement as presented." CITY MANAGER APPIIOVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVEI) [] DENIED [] TABLEI)/DEFERilEI)fNO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND REAl)lNG (ordinances only) COUNCIL IlllA~ # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July 7, 2003 PRHSPS Council Committee Mary Faber,~RRec_re~ion and Cultural Services Superintendent David M~ l~anager Arts CommissiOn Member Replacement Background: The by-laws of the Arts Commission states that if a Commissioner has two unexcused absences the Commission may request that the Commissioner be removed from the Commission. Commission Member Joe Martinez has four unexcused absences in 2003. At the July 3, 2003 Arts Commission meeting the Commission passed a motion to recommend to Council that Joe Martinez be removed from the Commission and alternate member, Ted Nelson be appointed to member status. Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to remove Arts Commissioner Joe Martinez from the Commission and appoint Ted Nelson as a voting member of the Arts Commission, to fill the unexpired term of Commissioner Joe Martinez through December 31, 2004, and forward to Full Council on August 5, 2003. Chair Member Committee Member CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding/Federal Way's Festival Days CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIl, BUSINESS [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACltMENTS: Committee Action Form dated July 14, 2003; Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Federal Way and Federal Way Community Council Regarding Federal Way's Festival Days 2003 SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: In 1994 the City formally adopted and co-sponsored the Federal Way Family Festival. This year, the Community Council announced its plan to expand the scope of the event and rename it Federal Way's Festival Days. The expanded Event is scheduled to occur August 22, 23, and 24, 2003 and includes a parade, food and craft vendors, performances, and a 5-K Fun Run. The Committee also announced its plan to include a beer garden and carnival located on private property at the SeaTac Mall. In light of these changes, the MOU limits the scope of the City's sponsorship and support to those activities that occur solely on City property, which includes Steel Lake Park, the BPA Trail and city roads. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public safety Committee adopted the following: "Motion to recommend a "do pass" recommendation to City Council authorizing the City Manager to execute the Federal Way Festival Days Memorandum of Understanding when finalized, provided that the Memorandum of Understanding and the related publicity adequately separates the City of Federal Way from the activities occurring on private propcrty, and to place this item under Consent Agenda on August 5, 2003." PROI'OSEI) MOTION: "1 move for approval of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Federal Way and Federal Way Community Council Regarding Federal Way's Festival Days 2003" CITY MANAGER APPROVAls: - ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERREDfNO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading [] MOVED TO SECOND READING ~ordinances only) ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.G CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July 14, 2003 PRHSPS Council Committee · Kurt Reuter, Pork Operations Superintendent David Mo~e~anager Federal Way'sqFcstiv~ll Days Memorandum of Understanding Background The 2003 Federal Way's Festival Days will take place the weekend of August 23, 24 and 25. The 2003 event format has undergone some changes. As in the past, a large part of the event will take place at Steel Lake Park. The most notable changes this year includes moving the carnival and some vendors to the Sea- Tac Mall parking lot. One additional entertainment stage will also be located in the mall parking lot. The organizing committee has added a 5K Fun Run to the list of activities as well. This activity will be staged in the Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatics Center parking lot and take place on the BPA Trail. Due to changes in the event format, final details of the event are not yet in place. Minor changes may occur to the MOU and the attachments. Staff is requesting you approve the document in draft form and authorize the City Manager to approve and sign the agreement when final form is determined. A copy of the Draft 2003 Memorandum of Understanding and Exhibits A and B are attached for your review. Exhibit A outlines city resources used to support the event and Exhibit B describes risk management requirements. Committee Recommendation Motion to recommend a "do pass" to the City Council authorizing the City Manager to execute the Federal Way's Festival Days Memorandum of Understanding when finalized_and to place this item under consent on the August 5, 2003 agenda, prc'~',,~~~~'c~xt ~4~_. ~¢~reg ~k~iC~ ~-~ APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: Committee Member Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Federal Way and Federal Way Community Regarding Federal Way's Festival Days 2003 THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU"), dated effective this 1 st day of August, 2003, defines the respective responsibilities of the City of Federal Way ("City") and the Federal Way Community Council CFWCC") in connection with the 2003 Federal Way's Festival Days event. Recitals: Ao The FWCC, through the Federal Way's Festival Days Committee, produces an annual outdoor event in the City of Federal Way, Washington, the event originally having been known as Federal Way Family Festival. Bo In 1994, pursuant to Resolution No. 94-166, the City formally adopted the Federal Way Family Festival as an official event co-sponsored by the City to benefit the citizens of Federal Way. Family Festival occurred solely in Steel Lake Park, located in Federal Way, Washington. Co This year, the FWCC has announced its plan to expand the scope of the event to the participation of merchants located in Federal Way and, accordingly, has renamed the event Federal Way's Festival Days ("the Event"). The expanded Event includes a parade, food and craft vendors, performances, activities, and a 5-K Fun Run, over a three (3)-day period, August 22, 23 and 24, 2003. Do On July 11,2003, the FWCC announced its plan to include a beer garden and a carnival located on private property, along with other activities located in and near the SeaTac Mall. In light of the recent changes to the scope of the Event, the City limits the scope of its sponsorship and support to those activities that occur solely on City property, which includes Steel Lake Park, the BPA Trail and city roads ("City Properties"). The City will assist with City services at the City Properties as outlined in this MOU. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: I. City Responsibilities. The City agrees as follows: 1. The City will provide staff support to set up the Steel Lake Park stage and canopy; 2. The City will waive the Special Event Permit fee for use of Steel Lake Park and BPA Trail Park facilities; o The City will waive application fees for a temporary business license, a temporary sign permit and an electrical permit for activities located on the City Properties; Page 1 -- C:~Documents and Settings~maryj~Local Settings\Temp~2003-MOUFina1022803.DOC I!. 4. The City will waive the right of way application fees for the parade route and the 5-K Fun Run. 5. All of the activities conducted by the FWCC pursuant to City permits or licenses on City Properties will be covered by the City's insurance program; The City will provide use of currently available and owned outdoor stage, bleachers, canopy, portable sound system, flatbed utility trailer, tow vehicle, and generator at Steel Lake Park during the Event; 7, The City will provide maintenance support for site preparation, logistical support and cleanup as outlined in the document entitled "2003 Projected City of Federal Way's Festival Days Support for Activities Occurring At Steel Lake Park" attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and incorporated by this reference. FWCC Responsibilities. The FWCC shall: 1. Pay for and obtain a temporary business license, a temporary sign permit, and electrical permit for activities located on private property. Screen all participating vendors, displayers and other groups ("Vendors"), whether operating on City Properties or on private property during the event, for required permits, required executed Vendor Participation Agreement, and proof of insurance coverage as outlined in the document titled "Insurance Requirements for Federal Way's Festival Days," attached hereto as Exhibit "B," and incorporated by this reference. All food vendors or other food handlers are required to obtain Health Department permits. FWCC shall provide to the City Manager's Office, by August 15, 2003, a list of all permitted vendors for inclusion in the Event. Without such certificates of insurance, a Vendor may not participate in the Event; Ensure that the City of Federal Way is named as an additional insured on all Vendor certificates of Vendors operating on City Properties. Copies of all insurance certificates will be provided to the City Manager's Office, by August 15, 2003, for inclusion in the Event. Without such certificates, a Vendor may not participate in the Event; Provide to the City Manager's Office, by August 15, 2003, a list of activities the FWCC is conducting on private property, and a list of activities the FWCC is conducting on the City Properties, including on each list the names and affiliations of the volunteers and FWCC members working at that location; Once a vendor has provided all necessary permits, waivers and insurance, FWCC shall provide the Vendor with identification (such as a sign to display inside each booth) indicating compliance with such requirements. FWCC shall ensure that such identification shall be displayed at all times during the Event; Page 2 -- C:~Documents and Settings~maryj~Local Settings\TempX2003-MOUFina1022803.DOC 6. Provide detailed site plans and a final time line of the Event by August 15, 2003 to the City Manager's Office; 7. Provide the City's logo identification on all marketing materials developed to promote the Event, except those activities to be conducted on private properties. 8. Provide booth space at the Steel Lake Event for promotion and sale of products by the City of Federal Way; Provide assistance to clean up and repair any damage to Steel Lake Park, Steel Lake Annex and BPA Trail Park, including qualified professional assistance to repair any damage to City roads that may occur during the Event; 10. FWCC agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, demands, losses, actions and liabilities (including costs and all attorney fees) to or by any and all persons or entities, including, without limitation, their respective agents, licensees, or representatives, arising from, resulting from, or connected with this MOU to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the FWCC, its partners, officers, shareholders, agents, employees, invitees, or volunteers, or by FWCC's breach of this MOU. FWCC waive any immunity that may be granted to it under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW. FWCC's indemnification shall not be limited in any way by any limitation of the amount of damages, compensation or benefits payable to or by any third party under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or any other benefits acts or programs. This MOU contains the obligations of both parties for Federal Way Festival Days and may not be changed or modified except by written agreement by both parties. ATTEST: David Moseley, City Manager P. O. Box 9718 33530 - 1 st Way South Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson Bob Hitchcock, President Federal Way Community Council Page 3 -- C:~Documents and SettingsXrnaryj~Local Settings\TempX2003-MOUFina1022803.DOC EXHIBIT A 2003 PROJECTED CITY OF FEDEI~L WAY'S FESTIVAL DAYS SUPPORT FOR ACTIVITIES OCCURRING AT STEEL LAKE PARK Permits/Rentals (In-Kind Value) Waiver of Special Events Permit* Waiver of Right of Way Permit for Parade Waiver of Right of Way Permit for 5-K Fun Run Stage and Canopy Rental (based on commercial rental rate) Liability Insurance ** Generator Portable Sound System ($100.00 per day) Canopies: 1 - 10 x 20 for Main Stage Dressing Room $ 800.00 $ 31.00 $ 31.00 $ 3,0OO.OO $ 2,500.00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 $ 100.00 Temporary Business License Electrical Permit (On Site Inspection, 4 hours ~ $85.50 per hour) Temporary Sign Permit Total *Estimate based on current Special Event Permit fee structure. **Currently under City insurance, with a $5,000 deductible. Materials & Supplies (In-Kind Cost) Garbage bags/Restroom supplies Miscellaneous supplies Total Staff Support (In-Kind Value) Pre-Event Site Preparation Relocate bleachers and tables Set up barricades and snow fencing Mark sprinkler heads and identify water lines Deliver and setup stage Deliver and setup canopies Deliver generator and additional garbage containers $ 25.00 $ 342.00 $ 35.5O $ 7,264.50 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 $ 600.00 4 people, 4 hours 2 people, 6 hours 2 people, 4 hours 2 people, 4 hours 4 people, 2 hours 2 people, 3 hours 20 hours full-time ~ $27.00/hour 38 hours part-time ~$12.1 O/hour 58 hours Total: Event Support Friday: Monitor park, garbage pick-up 3:00 p.m.- 9:00 p.m. Saturday: Assist vendors, monitor park, and garbage pick-up 7:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m.-10:00 p.m. Deliver/set up and take down/return Parade Reviewing Stand $ 540.00 $ 459.80 $ 999.80 3 people, 6 hours 3 people, 8 hours 3 people, 8 hours 1 person, 4 hours Page 4 -- C:kDocuments and SettingshnaryjkLocal Settings\Tempk2003-MOUFina1022803.DOC EXHIBIT A (Continued) Sunday: Monitor park, garbage pick-up, assist vendors with takedown, and take down canopies 11:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m. 3 people, 9 hours 26 hours full-time @ $27.00/hour 68 hours part-time ~ $12. I O/hour 94 hours $ 702.00 $ 822.8O Total $1,561.10 Post-Event Take down stage and other equipment Park Clean-up Return bleachers and tables BPA trail clean up 4 people, 4 hours 4 people, 4 hours 4 people, 4 hours 4 people, 4 hours 16 hours full-time ~ $27.00/hour 32 hours part-time ~ $12.1 O/hour 48 hours $ 432.00 $ 387.20 Total $ 819.20 Administration Park Operations Supt., 25 hours ~ $47.00/hour '~ Total $1,175.00 ~ (Hourly pay rates are based on average wage for superintendent, full time, and temporary seasonal maintenance workers. Benefit costs of 28% for full time and 10% for temporary staff are also included.) Loss of Revenue Picnics (at capacity) Tournaments (at capacity) $ 900.00 $ 39O.OO Total $1,290.00 Total In-Kind Total Lost Revenue GRAND TOTAL: $12,352.10 $ 1~290.00 $13,642.10 Other Impacts to the City: 4 days lost use of Steel Lake Softball Fields Compaction damage of park turf areas Utilities (water and power consumption) for 4 days Page 5 -- C:kDocuments and SettingsYnaryjkLocal Settings\Tempk2003-MOUFina1022803.DOC EXHIBIT B City of Federal Way Risk Management Division Insurance Requirements for Federal Way's Festival Days 2003 Events Conducted by FWCC on City Properties Insurance Requirements for contracted vendor or booth participants at Federal Way's Festival Days are as follows: TYPE OF ACTIVlTY AND EXPLANATION INSURANCE REQUIRED 1. Non-profit, information only booth. No insurance needed. Mutual indemnity clause only. 2. o ° Non-profit and/or service club sales, game or exhibit booth, NO FOOD. This category includes home based craft sellers, entertainers contracted on a flat fec basis to provide music, magic shows, Velcro tunnel, gyro-tron and the like. Non-profit and/or service club FOOD BOOTH. Commercial sales booth. Exceptional overnight use of park facilities as approved by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services. Commercial FOOD BOOTH or trailer. 1. Limited and/or retail food classification. These are commercial food exhibitors that do not utilize a complete kitchen; they sell a small number of specialty items, the potential health risk to the public is low, the opportunity for human or bacterial contamination is limited, i.e., popcorn, snow cones, cotton candy, prepackaged frozen ice cream. 2. Regular food service classification. These are commercial food exhibitors that utilize a complete kitchen; a full menu is available, food items may be prepared on site; the potential health risk to the public could be serious or dangerous if the foods were improperly prepared; it involves the preparation of potentially hazardous foods, i.e., dairy products, meat, fish, cooked vegetables, etc. No insurance needed. Mutual indemnity clause only. $2,000,000 combined single limit general liability, products liability and personal & bodily injury insurance required. $2,000,000 combined single limit general liability, and personal & bodily injury insurance required. $2,000,000 combined single limit general liability, and personal & bodily injury insurance required.. $2,000,000 combined single limit general liability, products liability and personal & bodily injury insurance required. $2,000,000 combined single limit general liability, products liability and personal & bodily injury insurance required. 7. Commercial game booth or event, i.e., $2,000,000 combined single limit general Page 6 -- CSDocuments and Settings~maryj~Local Settings\Tempk2003-MOUFina1022803.DOC carnival type games of chance. This category liability, products liability and personal & includes any ANIMAL rides, petting zoo, bodily injury insurance required. pony ride, llama ride and the like. Insurance Requirements for Federal Way's Festival Days (continued) TYPE OF ACTIVITY AND EXPLANATION INSURANCE REQUIRED 8. Commercial rides, i.e., carnival rides, including helicopter rides, tethered balloon rides, bungee seats and the like. $5,000,000 combined single limit general liability, products liability and personal & bodily injury insurance preferred, minimum of $2,000,000 required. Name the City as an additional insured. Other specialized insurance may be required in addition. Business or Vendor must sign an indemnification agreement with the City. NOTE: It is understood that at the discretion of the Management Services Director, based on his/her knowledge of the events and activities and risks involved, and based upon the above guidelines, increased levels of insurance may be required for a particular activity or event. All insurance certificates shall show the City of Federal Way named as additional insured as insurance coverage pertains to the activities described above. K:\Festival Days\2003-MOU Groupchange072203.DOC Page 7 -~ C:~Documents and Settingsknaryj\Local Settings\TempL2003-MOUFina1022803.DOC MEETING DATE: August5,2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL ITEM# SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Response to the King County Council; 2) July 2, 2003, Memorandum to the Land Use/ Transportation Committee (LUTC) with Exhibits A through F. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The City of Federal Way has received a request from King County to review and ratify the following five amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs): 1) adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; 2) adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; 3) amending the Urban Separator Map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; 4) designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; and 5) adding policies to address the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC reviewed the request at its July 7, 2003, meeting and voted to forward a recommendation of approval on the five amendments to the CPPs to the full council. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the LUTC's recommendation to approve the amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1st READING ENACTMENT READING ORDINANCE it RESOLUTION # I:\KCWPPS~003\City Council\080503 AGENDA BILL.DOC/07/25/2003 11:50 AM ° ieral Way CITY HALL 33530 1 st Way South · PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 661-4000 www. cityoffederalway, corn Ms. Cynthia Sullivan, Chair King County Council 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies Dear Ms. Sullivan: July 25, 2003 The Federal Way City Council at its August 5, 2003, meeting reviewed and approved the following proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs): Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development, and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2, and 02-3) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022, and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator Map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator, and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center, and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. o Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motions 01-2) - Adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Senior Planner Margaret Clark at 253-661-4111. Sincerely, Jeanne Burbidge, Mayor City of Federal Way Ron Sims, King County Executive Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County DDES Lauren Smith, Legislative Analyst, King County Council Kathy McClung Director of Community Development Services, City of Federal Way Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way l:~DOCU1VlENT~Countywide Planning Policies\O72503 Letter to King County doc/7/25/03 1200 PM Federal Way MEMORANDUM July 2, 2003 TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) David Moseley, City Manage~J~ ~/ Kathy McClung, AICP, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner Amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies July 7, 2003 I. BACKGROUND The City has received a request from King County to review and ratify amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) (Exhibit A). Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), countywide planning policies serve as the frame;york for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The CPPs were developed by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC), a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The CPPs were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities in 1994. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by tile cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the amendments unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. The 90-day deadline for these proposed amendments is August 19, 2003. The amendments include tile following: Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4, Exhibit B) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 2 July 2, 2003 Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2, and 02-3, Exhibit C) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5, Exhibit D) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator Map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies On behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6, Exhibit E) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.. Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motions 01-2, Exhibit F) -Adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. II. DISCUSSION This section will address each amendment request followed by staff discussion. Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County (Exhibit B). A. Staff Discussion In July 2002, the GMPC approved additions and changes to the 1994 CPPs relating to the 2002-2022 household and employment targets. (This will be discussed next as part of Ordinance 2003-0124 [GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2 and 02-3], Exhibit C.) At that time, the GMPC also considered an amendment to add a new policy to support long-term water supply planning efforts in addition to the new policy on transportation planning efforts (already part of Motion 02-1). This new amendment was offered in order to consider both water and transportation infrastructure planning to support new household and employment targets for the region. The GMPC allowed reconsideration of the amendment until agreement could be reached on the language. On September 25, 2002, the GMPC adopted the following new policy to the CPPs: Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 3 July 2, 2003 FW-12c Ensuring sufficient water s, upply is essential to accommodate growth and conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead time required to develop water supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing. B. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4). Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2, and 02-3) - Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; and ratif2~ing the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County (Exhibit C). A. Staff Discussion Motion 02-1, adopted by the GMPC on July 24, 2002, amended the CPPs to add new policies to support the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022. Motions 02-2 and 02-3 adopted by the GMPC on September 25, 2002, amended the CPPs to delete the old tables with the adopted 1992-2012 household and employment targets and replace them with the new 2002-2022 household and employment targets. The GMPC is responsible for developing updated household and employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County. In February 2002, the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) released new population forecasts for the 20-year period 2002-2022. The GMA requires King County and the cities within King County to plan to accommodate these projections by accommodating them in their household and employment targets. As a result, the GMPC's interjurisdictional staff team worked with a sub-committee of the King County Planning Directors to extend the existing targets through 2002. The methodology adopted by the GMPC took a sub-regional approach. First the County's urban area was divided into four subareas. These four subareas are SeaShore, East King County, South King County, and Rural Cities. The City of Federal Way is part of the South King County Subarea that includes Renton, Burien, SeaTac, Tukwila, Normandy Park, Des Moines, Kent, Covington, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, Auburn, Milton, Pacific, Algona, West Hill PAA, East Renton PAA, Fairwood/Soos Creek ['AA, and Southwest King County PAAs. An important underlying concept of the methodology was a jobs/housing balance. Therefore, the PSRC's 2000 to 2020 small area employment forecasts were used as a basis for allocating population forecasts to these subareas byapplying the employment percentages to the OFM countywide population forecast so that the proportion of housing Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 4 July 29, 2003 to jobs is balanced at a certain ratio. The household size of the various subareas were then determined based on the 2000 census, and adjusted downwards for 2022 based on the assumption that household sizes would decrease in the future. The household size for each subarea was used to determine how many new housing units would be needed to accommodate new population in 2022. Next, the remainder of the current household target by subarea at the end of 2000 was compared to the new households needed to accommodate new population. If South King County were to achieve their remaining household 2012 target, this would actually exceed the number of households needed to accommodate the 2002 to 2022 projected new households for the subarea. As a result, the methodology proposed that South King County receive no new targets for the 2012 - 2022 target extension period. After allocation of households to each subarea, jurisdictions within each sub-area negotiated their individual targets. As in the case of the household target extensions, the starting point for employment allocations was forecast from estimates derived for each city by the PSRC 2000 to 2020 small area employment forecasts. Future employment was then allocated to jurisdictions based on location of current employment, as well as location of commercial and industrial zones. The adopted household and job targets for cities, their PAA's and unincorporated areas within King County are shown in Table I of this staff report. Table I King County 2001 - 2022 Household and Employment Targets " ' Household PAA HH Job PAA Job Subareas Target Target Target Target SOUTH KING COUNTY Algona 298 108 Aubum 5,928 926 6,079 252 Black Diamond 1,099 2,525 Burien 1,552 1,712 Covington 1,173 900 Des Moines 1,576 2 1,695 Federal Way 6,188 1,320 7,481 134 Kent 4,284 619 11,500 44 Milton 50 37 1,054 Maple Valley 300 804 Normandy Park 100 67 Pacific 996 45 108 Renton 6,198 1,976 27,597 458 SeaTac 4,478 5 9,288 496 Tukwila 3,200 5 16,000 497 Unincorp King County 4,935 2,582 701 Total 42,355 4,935 89,500 2,582 EAST KING COUNTY Beaux Arts Village I 3 I I I Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 5 July 2, 2003 Household PAA HH Job PAA Job Subareas Target Target Target Target Bellevue 10,117 178 40,000 27 Bothell 1,751 584 2,000 174 Clyde Hill 21 Hunts Point 1 Issaquah 3,993 802 14,000 1 Kenmore 2,325 2,800 Kirkland 5,480 747 8,800 221 Medina 31 Mercer Island 1,437 800 Newcastle 863 1 500 Redmond 9,083 390 21,760 21 Sammarnish 3,842 1,230 Woodinville 1,869 2,000 Yarrow Point 28 Unicorp King County 6,801 4,099 4,637 4,193 Total 47,645 6,801 98,527 4,637 SEA-SHORE Lake Forest Park 538 455 Seattle 51,510 92,083 Shoreline 2,651 2,618 Unincorp King County 1,670 1,670 694 694 Total 56,369 1,670 95,850 694 RURAL CITIES Carnation 246 75 Duvall 1,037 1,125 Enumclaw 1,927 1,125 North Bend 636 1,125 Skykomish 20 Snoqualmie 1,697 1,800 Total 5,563 5,250 King County Total 151,932 289,127 B. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2, and 02-3). Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) -Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator Map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County (Exhibit D). Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 6 July 2, 2003 A. Staff Discussion Motion 02-5, adopted by the GMPC on October 23, 2002, amended the Urban Separator Map in the CPPs to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator. Urban Separators are regionally significant low-density areas within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) that create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to contiguous development and reinforce the unique identities of communities. Urban Separators can play a significant role in preserving environmentally sensitive areas and providing fish and wildlife habitat. They also provide regional benefits, such as parks and trails, and meet the GMA's requirements for greenbelts and open space within the UGA. Urban Separators are governed by CPP LU-27, which states that Urban Separators shall not be redesignated in the future 20-year planning cycle to urban uses or higher densities. Three cities in King County, Auburn, Kent, and Renton, have Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). However, the Urban Separators had not been mapped. This was seen as a problem by the GMPC staff because without a map, cities may not realize that they have Urban Separators within their PAA's. The GMPC staff met with Kent, Renton, and Auburn to clarify boundaries of the Urban Separators and an Urban Separator Map was created. However, Renton and Auburn had questions about their Urban Separator boundaries. Kent had recently annexed a large piece of property adjacent to Auburn's Urban Separator, and the GMPC jurisdictional team felt that there were some environmentally constrained areas within the annexed area adjacent to Auburn's existing Urban Separator, which would make a natural extension of the existing Urban Separator. The GMPC staff and Renton were able to come to an agreement. This agreement resulted in removing 76 acres of land within Renton's PAA from the Urban Separator status and designating 119 acres within the city as an Urban Separator, for a gain of 43 acres as Urban Separators. Discussions are still continuing with Auburn and Kent about boundaries of their Urban Separators. B. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5). Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) -Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County (Exhibit E). A. Staff Discussion Motion 02-6, adopted by the GMPC on October 23, 2002, amended the CPPs to designate Totem Lake as an Urban Center. In 2002, the City of Kirkland requested that Totem Lake be designated an Urban Center in the CPPs. Urban Centers are designated in the CPPs as Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 7 July 29, 2003 o areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit, and a wide range of other land uses. Urban Centers are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. In January 2002, the Kirkland City Council adopted a new plan for the Totem Lake neighborhood that would support its designation as an Urban Center. Designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center would involve amending CPP LU39 to add Totem Lake to the list of the existing Urban Centers in King County. The existing Urban Centers are Bellevue, Kent, Federal Way, Redmond Overlake, Redmond CBD, Renton CBD, Seattle CDBG, Seattle Center, First/Capitol Hill, University District, Northgate, and Tukwila. The GMPC interjurisdictional team analyzed Kirkland's request against the Urban Center criteria in the CPPs and found that Totem Lake met the criteria for an Urban Center. B. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6). Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2) -Adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County (Exhibit F). A. Staff Discussion Motion 01-2, adopted by the GMPC on September 26, 2001, reaffirmed Motion 99-3 passed by them on June 16, 1999. In June 1999, the GMPC adopted Substitute Motion 99- 3 to add new policies that address the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts (APDs). Specifically, Motion 99-3 stated that Designated APDs shall not be annexed by cities and that the Lower Green River Valley APD must remain in unincorporated King County and provide an urban separator as surrounding areas are annexed and developed. In addition, the GMPC recommended that the PAA Map in the CPPs be amended so that the Lower River Valley APD does not appear within the PAA boundaries of any jurisdiction and that the UGA Map be amended to draw the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley APD in order to clarify its classification as a long-term resource land. In 1999 and 2000, the King County Council amended the King County Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with Motion 99-3. Finally, in 2001, the King County Council considered the adoption of Proposed Ordinance 2002-0256, which would have amended the CPPs consistent with the recommendations of the GMPC and with the changes already made to the King County Comprehensive Plan. However, since King County was negotiating for purchase of property within the Lower Rive Valley APD and out of concern that the GMPC had adopted their recommendations in the absence of a quorum and without Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 8 July 2, 2003 an adequate public review process, the Council did not adopt the ordinance. Instead the Council remanded the motion back to the GMPC. In September 26, 2001, the GMPC reconsidered its actions with respect to Motion 99-3, and via the adoption of Motion 01-2 reaffirmed its previous actions. On November 20, 2002, King County completed their purchase of the Nelson property in the Lower Green River Valley APD. B. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city coUncil and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2). III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4). That the LUTC forWard a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02- 1, 02-2, and 02-3). 3. That the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5). 4. That the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6). 5. That the LUTC forward a recommendation of approval to the full city council and vote to ratify the proposed amendments to the CPPs contained in Ordinance 2003-012 7 (GMPC Motion 01-2). IV. COUNCIL ACTION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Committee has the following options: 1. Recommend that the full Council adopt the amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by staff. 2. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies. Staff recommends that the LUTC recommend to the full Council Option No. I above. Land Use/Transportation Committee Page 9 July 2, 2003 V. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows: As recommended for approval by staff. As recommended for disapproval by the LUTC. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTI°N ~~! Ch~ir ' ~I3'e~fi'~McCo~an LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F May 30, 2003, Correspondence from King County Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) with Attachments Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2, and 02-3) with Attachments Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) with Attachments Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) with Attachments Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2) with Attachments I:~KCWPPSL?.003\LUTC\070703 Staff Report to the LUTC.doc/07/02/2003 3:41 PM King County May 30, 2003 The Honorable Jeanne Burbidge Mayor, City of Federal Way 33530 - 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Dear Mayor Burbidge: We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). On May 19, 2003, the King County Council approved and also ratified seven amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County. Please note that the amendments approved by the Growth Management Planning Council for the growth targets, and the household and job target tables, were combined into one ordinance, 2003-0124. Copies of King County Council Staff Reports, County Ordinances, and Growth Management Planning Council Motions are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2 and 02-3) adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2) adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. EXHIBIT--.. ,. PAGE The Honorable Jeanne Burbidge May 30, 2003 Page 2 In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1 Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for these proposed amendments is August 19, 2003. If you have questions about the amendments or the ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705 or Lauren Smith, Legislative Analyst, King County Council, at 206-296-0352. If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please submit by close of business, August 19, 2003, one copy of the legislation to Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Science, 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest, Renton, WA 98055-1219. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Cynthia Sullivan, Chair King County Council King County Executive Enclosures cc; Lauren Smith, Legislative Analyst, King County Council Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES EXHIBIT PAGE II~ 'Of 3. KING COUNTY Signature Report May 19, 2003 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue' Seattle, WA 98104 Ordinance 14652 Proposed No. 2003-0123.1 Sponsors Hague 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the Countywide planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. BE IT ORDAINED BY TI-IE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. EXHIBIT ............ PAGE__J_/OF__ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Ordinance 14652' B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 11446. C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25, 2002 and voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development. SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Phase II. A. The Phase II Amendments to the King'County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Polic]es are amended, as shoWn by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning PolicieS are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. E. The phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, 'as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. EXHIBIT , PAGE__ & OF 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58. 59 60 Ordinance 14652 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance. SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. D. The Phase .ii amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of th.e population of unincorporated King County. E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 3 EXHIBIT_ PAG E__J__. 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 Ordinance 14652 F. The amendments to the Kihg County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,~ are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.~ G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - CoUntywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, a§ shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. p AG E_ O Ordinance 14652 82 83 84 85 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14652 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. ConStantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, ' Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCR. KING COUN3~, WASHINGTON ATTEST: Anne Nori$, Clerk of the Council APPROVED this ~ day of [T~Is4 ,2003. I Attachments . Attachment 1. GMPC Motion 02-4 EXHIB , Attachment 1 - 2003-0123 14652 September 25, 2002 /cm Sponsored By: ExeCutive Committee 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 · 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 MOTION NO. 02-4 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning Policies adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development. WHEREAS, in July 2002, the Growth Management Planning Council approved additions and changes to the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies approving the countywide process developed to recommend a new 22-year household and employment target; and WHEREAS, an amendment to add a new policy supporting ongoing water supply planning and development was considered and tabled; and WHEREAS, the GMPC allowed reconsideration of the amendment at such time agreement could be reached on the language; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the county to encourage regional 'efforts to plan for and develop sufficient water supply sources to accommodate population growth and to meet environmental needs related to conservation of fish habitat. THE GROWTH MANAGEMElqT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: Add a new policy to Section llI C of the King County Countywi.de Planning Policies as follows: FW-12c 'Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, longrterm water supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing. PAGE_ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0 14652 ADOPTED by the Growth .Management Planning Council of King County on September 25, 2002 in open session. Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council L/GMPC/02GMPC/Mot02 4.doc ~._ PAGE '~, OF~--~ Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 6 Name: Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0123 Date: Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO Lauren Smith March 18, 2003 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Actions On September 25, 2002 the GMPC adopted Motion 02-4 recommending the adoption of a new policy (FW12c) related to water supply planning and development. The issue of regional water supply was raised during discussions related to the adoption of new household and employment targets for the region, and was offered in the spirit of ensuring ongoing infrastructure planning efforts. The proposed new policy is consistent with existing policy direction in the CPPs related to. water supply planning (Policy CO-5). FW-12c Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: · Adding a new policy, FW-12c in support of an ongoing discussion related to long-term water supply planning. C:~WINDOWS\TEMP~2003-0123 (CPP Amendments - Water Supply Planning)(3-18-O3).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM EXHIBIT_ PAG Additionally, the ordinance would ratify this change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. POLICY DIRECTION Countywide Planning Policies C0-5 Water supply shall be regionally coordinated to provide a reliable economic source of water and to provide mutual aid to and between all agecnies and purveyors. THe region should work toward a mechanism to address the long-term regional water demand needs of all agencies and water purveyors. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123, with attachments PAGE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~003-0123 (CPP Amendments - Water Supply Planning)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM KING COUNTY Signature Report May 19, 2003 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Ordinance 14653 Proposed No. 2003-0124.1 Sponsors Hague 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I3 14 15 16' AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; revising existing policies and adding new policies in support' of the new targets; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King' County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findi.ngs. A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. PAGE_ Ordinance 14653 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34' 35 36 37 38 39 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 11446. C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on July 24, 2002 and voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, revising existing policies and adding new policies to support extending household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022. D. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25, 2002 and voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022. SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Phase II. A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. C. The Phase 1I Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. D. The Phase 1I Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. PAGE ;2, OF 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55' 56 57 58 59 60 61 Ordinance 14653 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. H. The Phase 1I Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1.to Ordinance 14391. I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -. Count. ywide Planning - Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. J. The Phase II Amendments to the King.County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this ordinance. SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Plann!ng Policies adop. ted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted bY Ordinance 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Qrdinance 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. EXHIBIT. PAGE 62 63 64 · 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8O 81 82 Ordinance 14653 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County., F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Couniywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260,.are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 tO Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population Of unincorporated King County. J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to OrdinanCe 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. EXHIBi'[ C PAGE__ OF 4 83 84 $5 86 87 88 89 Ordinance 14653 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14653 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms..Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 ' KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST: Anne Nods, Clerk of the Council C/ynthia Sulliva~ Chair APPROVED this~ day of ma., 2003. ! Attachments 1. GMPC Motion 02-1, 2. GMPC Motion 02-2, 3. GMPC Motion 02-3 EXHIBIT ,c ............. PA E $°F,2 1 2 Household HH Capacity PAA HH Job Capacity PAA lob Subareas Job Target Target in PAA* Target in PAA Target South King Countf Algona 298 Auburn 5.928 2,635 Black Diamond 1.099 [~urien 1,552 Covington 1,173 Des Moines 1,576 5 Federal Way 6,188 3,754 i ,320 . Kent 4,284 1,763 61 Milton 50 106 37 Maple Valley 300 .... r~orman~ P'~k 100 R~nton 6.198, 5.622: 1.976, SeaTac 4,478' 14 51 Tukwila 3,200 13 5 Unineoro King County 4,935 Total 42,355 14,~F~9 4~935 East Kin~ Count~ Beaux Arts Village Bellevue 10,117 184 178 Bothell 1,75 ! 603 584 .Clyde Hill 21 Hunts Point ! ... Issaouah 3,993 827 802 Kenmore 2,325 Kiddand 5.480 770 747 Medina 31 M~cer Island 1,437 Newcastle 863 .. 1 l Redmond 9,083 402 390 Sammnmish 3,842 W00~invill¢ 1,869 Yarrow Point 28 U~co~p kg C.o~ty 6,S01 *'422~ *'40~ Total 47~645 7~009 6~801 Sea-Shore Lake Forest Park 538 Seattle 51.510 Shoreline 2,651 Unincorp ICing County*** 1,670 1 ~670 1,670 Tglal 56,369 1,670 1,670 Rural Cities Carnation 246 Duvall 1,037 Enumclaw 1,9'~ North Bend 636 Skykomish 20 Snoqualmi¢ !,697 Total $~563 ~ County Total 151,932 *PAA: Potential AJmexation A~a in Uninco~x~rated King County U~an Area; **Beat Creek UPI3; ***North Highline The Rural Cities' tm'gets are fo~ th¢: curr~nt city limita and rural expansion area fol' each city. Thus the methodology for adjusting tatg~ts as am~xation~ occur is not =ppllcabl¢ lo the nual cities. IJGMPC/02GMPC/MotO2-2.doc EXHIBIT C 14653 Household HH Capacity PAA HH Job Capacity PAA Job Subaxeas Job Target Target in PAA* Target in PAA* Target South King CoutU~ AIgona Auburn . . 6,07~ 252 252 Black Diamond 2,525 Burien 1,712 I Covington ~.. 900 Des Moine~ 1,695 Federal Way 7,49! ~[ 34 134 Kent 11,500 44 44 Milton . I1.054 Maple Valley . ~04 Normandy Park 67 Pacific 108 Reaton 27.597 458 458 SeaTa~ 9.28l~ 496 496 Tukwila 16,000 497 497 'Unincorp King County 2,582 701 701 rom sg~00 2,5s~ Eas~ Kine Counl~ Beaux Arts Village t Bellevue 40,000 27 27 Bo~h¢ll . . . 2,000 174 174 Hunts Point .. Innaquah 14,000 Kenmo~ 2.800 Kh'klaad 8,800 221 221 Medina - Mercer Island 8® N~wcastJe .... 500 Redmond 2~J60 21 21 ,Rnmmaminh 1,230 W0odinville 2,000 Yarrow Point Unincotp King County . 4~637 *'4193 *'4193 Total .... 98~527 4~637 4,637 Sea-Shore Lake Forest pa~k 45~' .Seattle .... 92,083 Shoreline. 2,618 Unlncorp KingCounty*** 694 1,544 694 Total .. 95.850 '1.544 694 Rural Cities Carnation. 75 Duvall 1.125 Enumclaw .1,125 .. North Bend !,125 Skykomlnh Snoqualmie 1,8005 Total $~250 ~ County Total 289.127.. L/GMPC/02GM PC/Mot02-3 .doc - 3 - 14653 EXHIBIT C, 'Attachmentl 2003-0124 14653 July 24, 2002 /cm Sponsored By: Executive Committee 2 3 4 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 MOTION NO. 02-1 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning Policies revising existing policies and adding new policies to support the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022. WHEREAS, in accordance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a household and employment target range for each city and for King County through 2012; and WI-IEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be extended to reflect projected growth through 2022 in accOrdance with the GMA (RCW 36 70A 110); and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-3 states that the adopted household and employment targets shall be monitored bY King County annually with adjustments made by the Growth Management Planning Council utilizing the process established in FW-I, Step 6; and WHF-~AS since February 2001 staff from King County and the cities in King County have worked cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20-year household and employment targets; and WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, :2001 and May 22, 2002. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING coUNcIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: Amend Sections 1II. C and Ill. F of the King County Countywide Planning Policies ~as follows: III. Land Use Pattern C. Urban Areas EXHIBIT C,..... RaG F-/-L-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 3! 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4O 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 1.4653 The following policies establish an Urban Growth Area (UGA), determine the amount of household and employment growth to be accommodated within the UGA in the form of targets for each jurisdiction, and identify methods to phase development within this area in order to bring certainty to long-term planning and development within the County. Al__d cities are included in the UGA, with the cities in the Rural Area identified as islands of urban growth. The (Urban ~ ...... ~ ~-~ ............. / UGA is a permanent designation. Land outside the (Lr,~an,_,, ~ ...... v ,,.,,~, ~.,'~..~ UGA is designated for permanent rural and resource uses.((v .... r. a .............................. ~ Coun Policies on Rural and Resource Areas are found in Chapter IIIA, Resource Lands, and Chapter II1B, Rural Areas. In accordance wi~h the State Growth Management Act (GMA) (36. 70A. 110), the State .Office of Financial Management (OFM) provides a population projection to each count~. The count~, through a coIlaborativ~..intergovernmental process established by the Growth Management Planning Council, allocates the population as growth targets to individual jurisdictions. Forecasts prepared by the...puget Sound Regional Council are used to establish the employment projection. The pro~ess for allocating targets in King Count_ is as follows: 1. The PSRC employment forecasts are calculated for the four geographic subareas of the UGA (Sea-Shore, South, East, and Rural Cities). These then become subarea employment targets. 2. The jurisdictions collectively allocate the OFM population projection to the four subarea's based on the projected employment for each area. A small amount of growth is assumed to occur in the Rural area. 3.. The technical staff transIates the population projections into projected households, taking into account d(fferent average household sizes within eachsubarea. These projections then become subarea household targets. 4. Jurisdictions within each subarea negotiate the distribution of subarea household and employment targets using criteria based on Countywide Planning Policies. The housing capacity in the ~rrr.~.- u ............... ~rca)) UGA (6tar grawth)), based on adopted plans and regulations, ((meets thc)), should accommodate the projected'20-year pe~nent Urban Areas by incre~ing densitie& as needed. P~sing ((is ia)) s~dd occur u ................... )) UGA, as necessa~, to ensure that se~ices are provided ~-~ ~ The land us~ paaorn for Kin0 GounW shall protect th~ natural ~nvironm~nt by r~docin9 th~ consumption of land and eon~ntratin9 d~volopm~nt. An Urban Growth Ama, ~ural Ar~as, and r~sourco lands shall b~ d~si0nat~d and th~ necossa~ impbm~ntin9 r~0ulations adoptod. This includes Goun~id~ establishmont of a bounda~ for tho U~an Gro~h Ar~a. Lo~l jurisdictions shall mak~ land use d~cisions based on th~ Goun~ido Plannin9 Policies. IdGMPC/O2GMPC/Mot02-1 .doc EXHIBIT, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 1~653 The Urban Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate future urban development. Policies to phase the provision of urban services and to ensure efficient use of the growth capacity within the Urban Growth Area shall be instituted. FW-12a All iudsdictions within Kinq County share the responsibility to accommodate the 20-year Population proiection. The growth projection shall be assigned to the four subareas of Kinq County (Sea-Shore, East, South, and the Rural Cities) propodionate with the share of projected employment growth...The growth shall be allocated pursuant to the followin.q objectives: a. To ensure efficient use of land within the UGA by directinq growth to Urban Centers and Activity Centers;- b. To limit development in the Rural Areas; c. To protect desi.qnated resoume lands; d. To ensure efficient use of infrastructure; e. To improve the jobs/housinq balance on a subarea basis; f. To promote a land use pattern that can be served by. public transpodation and other alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle; and g. To provide sufficient opportunities for growth within the jurisdictions. FW-12b The growth tarqets established pursuant to the methodoloqy described in LU-25c and 25d shall be supported by.. both reqional and local transportation investments. The availability of an adequate transpodation system is-critically important to accommodatinq growth. The re.qional responsibility shall be met byplannin.q for and deliverinq county, state, and federal investments that support the .qrowth tarqets and the land use pattem of the County. This includes investments in transit, state highways in key re,qional transportation corridors, and in .improved access to the designated Urban Centers. The local _responsibility shall be met by local transportation system investments that support the achievement of the targets. LU - 25a Each jurisdiction shall plan for and accommodate the household and employment tar.qets established pursuant to LU-25c and LU-25d. This obligation includes: a. Ensurinq adequate zonin.q capacity; and b. Planninq for and deliverinq water, sewer, transportation and other infrastructure, in concert with federal and state investments and reco.qnizing where applicable special purpose districts; and c. Accommodatinq increases in household and employment tarqets as annexations occur. The tarqets will be used to plan for and to accommodate growth within each jurisdiction..The targets do not obliqate a jurisdiction to guarantee that a given number of housinq units will be built or jobs added durinq the plannin.q period. I~GMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-1 .doc - 3 EXHIBIT C, ., 5 6 7 8 9 10 11' 12 13 14 1/5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 LU25b 14653 AS annexations occur, .qrowth tarqets shall be adjusted. Household and employment targets for each iurisdiction's potential annexation area, ,as adopted in Table LU-1, shall be transferred to the annexinq iurisdiction follows: a. Kinq County and the respective city will determine new household and employment tarqets for areas under consideration for annexation pdor to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the Kin.q County Boundary Review Board; b. A city's household and employment tar.qets shall be increased by a share of the tarqet for the potential annexation area proportionate to the share of the potential annexation area's development capacity located within the area annexed. Each city will determine how and where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the tarqet increases; The County's target shall be correspondin.qly decreased to ensure that overall tarqet levels in the county remain the same; The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations. These target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Management Planning Council. LU - ((67)) 25cThe target ((s-and .,,u ......... )) 0blechves identified in ((LU-66)) FW-12a.((aro bated on)) shall be realized through the following ((steps)) methodology for allOcating household largets: ..... ~C .~ on ........ ~ ~ nnm~ Determine the additional population that must be accommodated coun~ide by calculatin~ the difference be~een the most recent Gensus count and.~e ,State Office of Financial Management population proiection for the end of the twenty year planning period; Subtract a pementaqe from that number to represent the amount of' flro~h that is assum~ ~to ~ur in tho unincorporatod ~ural ~roa[ ((1 Th.c capaclb' ""~ condition ~' u,';ven the ~ .... +~-~. ~ ~v~+;-~ ~h .... a ~- ~ range ~. ,~hous~n~ ~ .... IdGlVIPC/02GMPC/Mot02-1 .doc EXHIBIT PAGE_i// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 O. 14653 Assign proportions of the urban population growth to each of the four subareas (Sea-Shore, South, East, and Rural Cities) based on the prop.dion of future employment growth forecasted for each of those subareas by the Puget Sound Reqional Council; Convert the estimated projected population for each subarea to an estimated number of householdsi using projected averaqe household sizes that reflect the variatiOn am.hq those subareas · observed in the most recent Census; Allocate a household tarqet to individual jurisdictions, within each subarea, based on FW-12a and considerinq the followinq factors: 1. the availability of water and the capacity of the ~s_ewer system; 2. the remaininq portions of previously adopted household targets; 3. the presence of urban centers and activity areas within each jurisdiction; 4. the availability of zoned development capacity in each jurisdiction; and 5.' the apparent market trends for housinq in the area. ((c. Thc target ranges ,a- .4. ..... ~.. ^ .... ,q~,. o ...... recommended ~',, .,,,, ..... , ,,., ,.,.,;,.,, ~^, 4, ~,,.,-. dc;)) i..,,.,,~.,,.~,.., ,,. ,v 1""'""'7 .... '""'~1~ f. Jurisdictions shall plan for household tarqets as adopted in Table LU-1; and ((fi)g, Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW- A porn'on of the urban employment growth will occur in Activity Areas and neighborhoods in the Urban Area. This employment growth will support the Urban Centers, while balancing local employment opportunities in the Urban Area. LU- ((68)) 25d...((Target ...... .tops)) The tarqet oblectives identified in ~-12a shall be realized through tho followinq mothodolo~ for all~atin~ employment tattlers: ((The Growth L/GM PCJO2GMPC/Mot02-I .doc 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 14653 %JO.'3S ~,-,r *-~r,',-,~ for ,.m~,' ...... ...... ~, ranges .... ~..~ ....... u ............................... A,r¢o~- f~r o~nh J, [rJo~4J~fh,'~rm hoc, nd nn ~)) Determine the number of jobs that must be aooommodaled in each of the four subareas of King Cou0~ (Sea~ Shore, South, Easl, and the ~ural Cities) in aucordan~ wilh tho most recent PS~O job estimates and fore.sis for the 20-year plannin~ period. To account for unce~ain~ in lhe-employment forecasts, establish a range oJ new jobs that must bo a~omm~ated in each subarea. Unless exceptional circumstances diolale, the ranqe should be S% on either side of lhe PS~O forecast .......... ~ .... ~ ..... ~ <)) For each subarea, deie~ine the point within th~ ranoe upon which iuri$~imions within the subarea will b~se their taroeis an~ ~llocme e~plovment oro~h taro~ts to. individual jurisdictions base~ on co~9iO~rmio~ oF th~ followino: m. the PSfiC small area ~ore~sts; 2. the presence ot u~an centers, manutactu~n~industrial centers, and activi~ areas within each }uri~dimion; 3. the availabili~ oi zoned commercial and industrial ~v~lo~m~nt ~apaci~ in each juri~imiofl 4. the access to transit, as well as to existinfl highways and aderials. Ao ~ n~ nf thnir nnmnrnhnnek,n nlon~ oll m~ .... ~ th~ p~ooess ......................... c. Judsdiolions shall plao for employmenl larqeis as adopied in lable LU-~. 0NSERT TASTE LU-m) L/GMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-1 .doc - 6 - EXHIBIT- ,, L- PAGE J.J._O F--TJ 2 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 F. 1. Urban Residential Areas 14653 Urban residential areas form the bulk of the UGA, and are home to a large portion of the County's population. They will contain a mix of uses and will have different characteristics in different neighborhoods. Generally, the character, form, preservation and development of these areas ((is ~)) are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction ((at rcsFcnsibili~')). However, thc residential areas need to support the Centers concept and provide sufficient opportunity for growth within the UGA. A substantial majority of new residential units will be constructed within urban residential area& LU-66 In order to ensure efficient use of the land within the UGA, provide for housing opportunities, and to support efficient use of infrhstructure, each jurisdiction shall: a. Establish in its comprehensive plan a target minimum number of net new households the jurisdiction will accommodate 'in the next 20 years in accordance with the adopted household .growth tarqets identified in Table LU-1. Jurisdictions shall adopt regulations to and commit to fund infrastructure sufficient to achieve the target number; b. Establish a minimum density (not including critical areas) for new construction in each .residential zone; and c. Establish in the comprehensive plan a target mix of housing types for new development and adopt regulations to achieve the target mix. I I LR7 Tht~ IJGMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-1 .doc EXHIBIT C. ,,, PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 n5 46 47 48 1'[653 .-, Th .....h m ......... ,~h.~ .,-,~,,, .m.~! Stop .,~ ~v~.,~.. ~,~ ~ , u,~ ,v,,v,,,,,~ on 5. Tho ,.,;11; ....... f I~1 ;,,.;o~;~H~n~ f~ ;m~l~n~ nnl;~; ..... h;nh a~ th~ ~dnnf;nn nf nnl;n;ne fh~t nnnn,,~n~ nh ~of~r;nn~. , nf. ~mm~r~;~l ~ r~;~;~l b ThO target r~qges -~ .h ..... ~n n ....a;v o ,, ............ ~a s,, ,~,,,,vM~,,,~.~i,.,~..- ~,tI ~,,~ .~,~v.v~ ,,,v,~v~ ,,. L/GMPCJ02GMPC/Mo~2-1 .d~ - 8 - EXHIBI-'i". C, PAGE I $OF_2 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 14653 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on July 24, 2002 in open session. ~r ~ ' , Growth Management Planning Council ~GM PC./02GMPC./M or02 - 1 .doc - 9 Attachment 2 2003-0124 14653 July 24, 2002 /cra Sponsored By: Executive Committee 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 MOTION NO. 02-2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning Policies adding targets for new household for the period 2001-2022 by deleting Appendix 2, 2A and 2B and amending Table LU-I: 2001~ 2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be located in Section m. c of the Countywide Planning Policies. WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for each city and for King County; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of the targets through 2022; and WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: The attached Table LU-I: 2001-2022 Household and Employment GroWth Targets is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise the household growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2022 and Appendix 2, 2A, 2B are recommended for deletion. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14653 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 25, 2002 in open session. , Chair, Growth Management Planning Council Attachment: 1. 'Table LU-I: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets. IdGMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-2.doc EXHIBIt; C,, Attachment 3 2003-0124 14653 July 24, 2002 ]cm Sponsored By: Executive Committee 2 .3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23' 24 '25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 MOTION NO. 02-3 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning Policies adding targets for new jobs for the period 2001-2022 by amending Table LU-I: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be located in Section BI. C of the Countywide Planning Policies. WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established an employment target range for each city and for King County; and WHEREAS, the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of the targets through 2022 as required by the Growth Management Act. WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: The attached Table LU-I: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets is hereby 'recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise the employment growth target, s to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2022.. EXHIB p^G 1 2 '3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1~653 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council Of King County on September 25, 2002 in open session. Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council Attachment: 1. Table LU-h 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets. PAG I./GMPC/02GMPCJMotO2-3.doc - 2 - Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 7 Name: Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0124 Date: Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO Lauren Smith March 18, 2003 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes tothe CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Development of Household & Employment Targets In February 2002, the Washington State Office of Financial Management released new population forecasts for the 20-year period 2002-2022 (the projections were smaller than expected, largely due to the current economic climate). The GMA requires King County and the cities within King County to plan to accommodate these updated projections. The GMPC is responsible for developing updated household and employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County. The GMPC's interjurisdictional staff team worked with a subcommittee of the King County Planning Directors to extend the existing targets through 2022, with the GMPC's approval of their methodology. In recent years, the region has grappled with the concept of a jobs/housing "balance" as part of ongoing growth management discussions. The development of the updated targets was approached with the jobs/housing balance in mind. The methodology approved by the GMPC took a sub-regional approach. First, the County's urban area was divided into four subareas: "SeaShore" (comprised of Seattle, Shoreline, and EXHIBIT C ,,, Lake Forest Park), East King County, South King County and the Rural Cities1. Next, a percentage of the total population forecast for King County was assigned to each subarea that was based on the percentage of expected job growth for each subarea (employment forecasts were provided by the Puget Sound Regional Council). Finally, the raw population numbers were converted into households (based on the average household size in each subarea), and the jurisdictions within each subarea negotiated their household targets. The draft household and employment targets were presented to the GMPC On May 22, 2002 at which time the GMPC directed staff to prepare motions recommending their adoption. Policy changes related to the new targets were adopted on July 24, 2002 and the targets themselves were adopted on September 25, 2002. Development of the household targets was informed by the results of the Buildable Lands work (required by GMA), which has been developed over the past 5 years (the Buildable Lands Report was released in August, 2002). Major findings from this work include: · 96% of all new development in King County is occurring within Urban Growth Areas. · 40% of the way through the 1992-2012 planning period, King County has reached 38% of the household growth target, and more than 50% of the population forecast. · King County has the capacity for 263,000 more housing units. This is more than twice the capacity needed to accommodate the remainder of the 1992-2012 household growth targets. · King County has the capacity for nearly 600,000 more jobs within the Urban Growth Area - several times the remaining target of 110,000 jobs for the period 1992-2012. · Alt available evidence suggests that there is enough capacity to support the new targets through 2022. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: · Adopting revised household targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period 2001-2022; · Adopting revised employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period 2001-2022; and · Amending the policy direction in the Countywide Planning Policies in support of the new household and employment targets. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1 Although the Carnation, Duvall, Enumclaw, North Bend and Snoqualmie are called Rural Cities, the Growth Management Act considers all municipalities to be Urban. Rural cities provide the vast majority of services and infrastructure for residents of the Rural unincorporated area, and they do have growth targets, albeit small ones when compared to cities in the main urban growth area. C:\WINDOWS\TEMF~,2003-0124 (CPP' Amendments - Household Employment Targets)(3-18-03).doc 5/2112003 8:50 AM EXHIBIT C,, 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124, with attachments C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~003-0124 (CPP Amendments - Household Employment Targets)(3-18-O3).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM KING COUNTY signature Report May 19, 2003 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Ordinance 14654 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Proposed No. 2003-0125.1 Sponsors Hague AN ORDINANCE adopti'ng amendments to.the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended~ and K.C.Co 20.10.040 BE 1T ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.. A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. Ordinance 14654 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase 11 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 11446. C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23, 2002 and voted to recommend amendments to the King County'2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator. SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Phase I1. A. The Phase 11 Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. C. The Phase li Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. D. The Phase 1I Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. Ordinance 14654 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 6O G. The Phase Il Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. I. The Phase lI Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. J. The Phase Il Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance. SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of th.e population of' unincorporated King County. E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14654 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 7O 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified On behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - CoUntywide Planning. Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. EXHIBt-[ PAGE 4 82 83 84 85 Ordinance 14654 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning..Poli.cies, as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14654 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. EdmOnds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST: Anne Nods, Clerk of the Council APPROVED ll~is ~ day of ~ I Cynthia Sullivan, Chair · '! 7-'~ !' '"l ExecuU Attachments 1. GMPC Motion 02-5 EXHIBi PAGE Attachment l 2003-0125 14654 October 23,2002 Sponsored By: Executive Committee MOTION NO. 02-5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 A MOTION to amend the Urban Separator Map in the Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator. WHEREAS, .The Growth Management Act states that each Urban Growth Area shall permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas; WHEREAS, Urban Separators are an adopted regional strategy serving multiple functions and providing environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits to the citizens and communities of King County; WHEREAS, Consistent With the Countywide Planning Policies, the King County Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Urban Separators create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to continuous development, and reinforce the unique identities of communities; WHEREAS, King County has designated Urban Separators on the Land Use 2000 map in the King County Comprehensive Plan, and King County has provided advance copies of Urban Separator maps to cities that have designated Urban Separators located within their Potential Annexation Areas; WHEREAS, the City of Renton disagreed with Urban Separator.designation for 76 acres of land within its Potential Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council directed staff to attempt to negotiate a'mutually acceptable resolution of this disagreement EXHIB -i-. .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14654 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MovEs AS FOLLOWS: The Urban Separators map included within the Countywide Planning Policies document is amended to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator described and mapped in the September 25, 2002 GMPC staff report. Specifically, 76 acres of unincorporated land is deleted from Urban Separator designation and 118.8 acres within the City of Rent°n shall be designated Urban Separator. ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on October 23, 2002 in open session. Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council IdGM PCJ2002GMPC/Motion02-5 .doc EXHIBI¥_._) PAGE OF Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 8 Name: Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0125 Date: Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO Lauren Smith March 18, 2003 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. Countywide Planning Policies: Policy Direction related to Urban Separators Urban Separators are regionally significant Iow-density areas within the Urban Growth Area that create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to continuous development and reinforce the unique identities of communities. Urban Separators can play a significant role in preserving environmentally sensitive areas and providing fish and wildlife habitat. They also provide regional benefits, such as parks and trails, and meet the Growth Management Act's requirement for greenbelts and open space within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators are governed by Countywide Planning Policy LU-27: LU-27 Urban Separators are Iow-density areas or areas of little development within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators shall be defined as permanent Iow-density lands which protect adjacent resource lands, Rural Areas, and environmentally sensitive areas and create open space corridors within and between Urban Areas which provide environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits. Designated urban separators shall not be redesignated in the future (in the 20-year planning cycle) to other urban uses or higher densities. The maintenance of these urban separators is a regional as C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~003-0125 (CPP Amendments - Renton Urban Separator)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM EXHIBIT "Z), PAGE__. _OF well as local concern. Therefore, no modifications should be made to the development regulations governing these areas without King County review and concurrence. Urban Separators are within the Urban Growth Area and therefore are appropriate to be annexed by cities. Once annexed, Urban Separators (and all other annexed land) are shown as "incorporated areas" on the County's comprehensive land use map. The lack of a map of Urban Separators in the countywide planning document was seen by the staff as problematic because it increased the likelihood that cities might be unaware of the presence of Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas. Therefore, the interjurisdictional staff team recommended that the GMPC adopt a map of existing Urban Separators. Three cities have designated Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas: Auburn, Kent, and Renton. Past GMPC Actions related to Urban Separators July 25, 2001 GMPC staff recommends including a map of existing urban separators in the Countywide Planning Policies. Member jurisdictions of the GMPC express concern over the boundaries of designated Urban Separators and ask the interjurisdictional staff team to present additional information at the September meeting. September 26, 2001 GMPC directs staff to meet with affected cities (Kent, Renton and Auburn) to answer questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated Urban Separators. October 5, 2001 King County staff meets with Kent, Renton and Auburn to answer questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated Urban Separators. November 20, 2001 The interjurisdictional staff team reports to the GMPC Executive Committee that staff has successfully negotiated a solution to concerns about mapping Urban Separators raised by Renton and Auburn. The Executive Committee directs staff to develop a motion for the GMPC's consideration at the December meeting. December 11, 2001 GMPC adopts Motion 01-1, adopting maps of uncontested Urban Separators and setting in place a process to further analyze and refine the Urban Separators in Renton and Auburn's Potential Annexation Areas, to be completed no later than September 30, 2002. September 25, 2002 The interjurisdictional staff team reported back to the GMPC with the following information on the City of Renton and Auburn's Urban Separators: City of Renton Renton did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 76 acres of unincorporated urban land within their Potential Annexation Area (PAA), citing lack of environmental EXHIBIT PAGE /O C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~'003-0125 (CPP Amendments- Renton Urban Separator)(3-18-03).do¢ 5/21/2003 8:50 AM O F constraints. However, Renton did identify 119 acres within their city limits that they felt met the criteria for designation of Urban Separators. The City proposed removing the Urban Separator designation from the 76 acres within their PAA, and applying the designation to the 119 acres within their city boundaries, for a net gain of 43 acres. The interjurisdictional staff team field- checked the two areas and concurred with the city's conclusions. City of Auburn Auburn did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 178 acres of land within their PAA, but has identified 153 acres they do feel meets the criteria. The City of Kent recently annexed a large piece of property adjacent to Auburn's existing Urban Separator that the interjurisdictional staff team believes contains environmentally constrained areas and that would make a natural extension of the existing Urban Separator. However, the City of Kent does not wish to consider designating this area until sometime in 2003. Therefore, the interjurisdictional staff team recommends that discussions should continue with Auburn and Kent, and that staff should report back to the GMPC with recommendations by June 1, 2003. October 23, 2002 The GMPC adopted Motion 02-5, amending the Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: · Revising the Urban Separator map to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator, as indicated on the map in Attachment 2 to this staff report. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125, with attachments 2. Map of Renton Urban Separator C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~2003-0125 (CPP Amendments - Renton Urban Separator)(3-18-03),doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM PAGE ¢, KING COUNTY Signature Report May 20, 2003 Ordinance 14655 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Proposed No. 2003-0126.1 Sponsors Hague AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase Il amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 11446. EXHiBiT_ ti P. GE_ I OEIO Ordinance 14655 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34- 35' 36 37 38 39 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23, 2002 and voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Phase II. A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning . Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I through 4 to Ordinance 13415. F. The Phase I1 Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as Shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. EXHIBil-._ pAGE Ordinance 14655 4O 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 6I I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. J. The Phase l~.Amendments to the'King County 201/2 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to this ordinance. SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf.of the population of unincorporated King County. C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11061' are hereby ratified on behalf of the populati,on of unincorporated King County. D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified' on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. EXHIBIT. PAGE._ OF 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73' 74 75 76 77 78 79 8O Ordinance 14655 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. H..The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Count~vide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance. 14392, are hereby ratifidd on behalf of the population, of unincorporated King County. M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as EXHIBi- .... PAGE_ OF' tO Ordinance 14655 81 82 83 · shown by Attachment I to this ordinance, are hereby ratified On behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14655 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the MetrOpolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, · Mr. Irons and Ms. Patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 ATTEST: Anne Nods, Clerk of the Council APPROVED this._L~day of mos~ KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cynthia Sullivan, Chair "~ r~ Attachments 1. GMPC Motion 02-6 EXHIBIT__ PAGE $ ARachmentl 2003-0126 14655 October23,2002 Sponsored By: Executive Committee MOTION NO. 02-6 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 .30 31 32 33 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. Totem Lake is added to the list of Urban Centers following CountyWide Planning Policy LU-39. WHEREAS, A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage-development in Urban Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; WHEREAS, Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes the criteria for Urban Center designation; : WHEREAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers; WHEREAS, the City of Kirkland has demonstrated that Totem Lake meets the criteria for designation as an Urban Center, 'and that Kirkland's "Totem Lake Activity Area" designated on the City's comprehensive plan land use map is consistent with the standards established by the Countywide Planning Policies for Urban Center designation. WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-106 supports the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, jobs, services, culture and recreation. PAG F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1~655 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: Totem l_ake is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban Centers following .Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Totem Lake. ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on October 23, 2002 in open session. ~Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council L/GMPC/2002GMPC./Motion02-6.doc Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 9 Name: Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0126 Date: Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO Lauren Smith March 18, 2003 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities, Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. City of Kirkland requests Urban Center designation for Totem Lake In 2002, the City of Kirkland requested that Totem Lake be designated as an Urban Center in the Countywide Planning Policies. Urban Centers are envisioned in the CPPs as areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit, and a wide range of other land uses. They are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. In January, 2002 the Kirkland City Council adopted a new plan for the Totem Lake neighborhood that would support its designation as an Urban Center. Totem Lake, which is located in the northeast corner of Kirkland, encompasses about one square mile and includes residential, office, retail, light industrial and institutional uses. Designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center would involve amending Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 to add it to the list of existing Urban Centers, which currently includes: · :. Bellevue .'.. Redmond Overlake -.'. Seattle CBD · .'. Kent .:-Redmond CBD -.'. Seattle Center · .'. Federal Way .:.Renton CBD .:.First/Capitol Hill EXHIBIT_ E C:\WiNDOWS\TEMP~2003_0126 (Cpp Amendments . Totem Lake Urban CenlerX3., 8.03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 p AG E- S..OF t~ University District .:. Northgate .:. Tukwil'a In order to be designated as an Urban Center, jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: · :. A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; · :- At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and · :. At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. When fully realized, Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: · :. Clearly defined geographic boundaries; · :. An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; · :. Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; · :. Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; · :o Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; o:.A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and residents; · :o Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and · :. Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. The interjurisdictional staff team analyzed the Totem Lake neighborhood against all of the criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies governing Urban Centers, and found that an Urban Center designation would be appropriate, for the following reasons: · :. The City of Kirkland has completed the necessary planning to support an Urban Center designation. · :. By 2012, Totem Lake is projected to contain over 4,500 housing units and 21,400 jobs. · :. Totem Lake is planned as a transit oriented development district with very high residential and commercial intensity. · :- A new transit center will be constructed at the center of the transit oriented development district. o:.Within ½ mile of the transit center, 11,000 jobs and 2000 housing units are projected by 2012. Another 3,000 to 4,000 jobs are expected by 2022. · :. Employment densities in Totem Lake are planned for a minimum of 130 jobs per acre (net), and will reach approximately 40 jobs per gross acre by 2022. · :. Residential densities are planned for 50-75 units/acre (net). Capacity will remain for additional job and housing growth beyond 2022. · :. Other comprehensive plan policies are in place to support pedestrian emphasis, job creation and re-investment, redevelopment, high density residential and high intensity commercial uses, design principles, infrastructure, parks and open space, and community services. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: · Adding Totem Lake to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to EXHIBIT.--F---- C:\WINDOVVS\TEMF~2003-0126 (CPP Amendments - Totem Lake Urban CenterX3-18-O3}.doc 5f'21/2003 have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126, with attachments EXHIBi':~.___~' PAGE_~O OF ~ C:\WINDOWS\TEMI:A2003-O126 (CPP Amendments - Totem Lake Urban Center)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM KING 'COUNTY Signature Report May 20, 2003 200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Ordinance 14656 Proposed No. 2003-O127.1 Sponsors Hague 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of agricultural production districts; ratifying the amended COuntywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: · SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Coun. tywide Planning Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. B. The,metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 11446. Ordinance 14656 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on June 16, 1999, and adopted Motion 99~3, recommending amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies addressing tlie long-term protection of agricultural production districts; adopting new policies LU-2A and LU-2B, revising the interim potential annexation area map so that the lower green river valley agricultural production district is not within .the potential annexation area of any city, and drawing the urban growth area boundary around the lower green river valley agricultural production district to clarify that it is outside of the urban growth area. E. The King County Council adopted Motion 11208 on May 21, 2001, requesting that the GMPC review and reconsider its Motion' 99-3 and provide for a thorough public process, including opportunities for public testimony. D. The Growth Management Planning' Council met on September 26, 2001 and adopted Motion 01-2, reaf£n'ming Motion 99-3. SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Phase II. A. The Phase 1I Amendments to the King County 2012 Cou. ntywide Planning Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 Ordinance 14656 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. E. The Phase II Amendments to the. King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance. 13415. F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance' 13858. G. The Phase Il Amendments to the King County 201-2 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391~ I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -' Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. J. The Phase ]3[ Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to this ordinance. SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section' 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are each hereby amended to read as follows: Ratification for unincorporated King County. A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. PAGE_ OF Il Ordinance 14656 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8O 81 82 83 D. The Phase 11 amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Coun/ywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population Of unincorporated King County. J. The amendments to the King County 2012 ~ Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. ' PAGE__q:_OF Ordinance 14656 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County., L. The amen,dments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as EXHIBI'I .... P 5 Ordinance 14656 91 92 93 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. Ordinance 14656 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Ms. Sullivan, Ms. Edmonds, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Pelz, Mr. McKenna, Mr. Constantine, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons and Ms. patterson No: 0 Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST: Anne Noris, Clerk of the' Council APPROVED this ,~l~0Xdayof ~ Cynthia Sullivan, Chair · 2003. Attachments 1. GMPC Motion 99-3, 2. GMPC Motion 01-2 EXHIBt' i._ F PAG Attachment 2 2003-0127 14656 September 26, 2001 Sponsored By: Executive Committee MOTION NO. 01-2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 -24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33. 34 35 .. A MOTION reaffirming Motion 99-3 passed by the GMPC on June 16, 1999 amending the Countywide Planning Policies to add new policies that address the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts. WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act requires the maintenance, enhancement and conservation of agricultural industries and lands through a variety of methods and programs; WHEREAS, .King County residents have supported efforts to preserve good farmland and active farms for the value of local crops, dairy and livestock and for scenic and historic values; WHEREAS, King County, through the Farmlands Preservation Program, has purchased the development rights of 12,600 acres of farmland and has established the Agricultural Production Districts (APDs) to further protect these and adjacent prime agricultural lands; WHEREAS, the Lower Green River APD is ~ompletely surrounded by Urban designated lands and as such is under immense pressure for development and annexation; and' WHEREAS, King County and the City of Auburn have signed an interlocal agreement.that removes the southern portion of the Lower Green APD out of the city's potential annexation area. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: Reaffirm the unanimous vote by this Council on June 16, 1999 to add the following new Countywide Planning Policies: LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by cities. LU-2B The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. Preservation of the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District will provide an.urban separator as surrounding Urban areas are annexed and developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as appropriate. pAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ~0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 14656 In the event that this motion is ratified by the member jurisdictions of Growth Management Planning Council, then the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map shall be revised accordingly and the Urban Growth Boundary will be drawn around the Lower Green Agricultural Production District (APD) to clarify that the APD is outside of the Urban area. ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 26, 2001 in open session. ~ement Planning council . LtGMPC/2001GlVlPC/Motion01-2.doc - 2 - EXHIBIT PAGE 8 Metropolitan Kin, g County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 10 Name: Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0127 Date: Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO Lauren Smith March 18, 2003 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Actions In June of 1999, the GMPC adopted Substitute Motion 99-3, recommending amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, as follows: Recommendation #1. Add two new policies addressing the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts: LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production Districts shall not be annexed by cities. LU-2B The Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. Preservation of the Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District will provide an urban separator as surrounding urban areas are annexed and developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as appropriate. EXHI " F ' PAGF. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~2003-0127 (CPP Amendments - Lower Green River Valley APD)(3-18-O3).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM Recommendation #2. Amend the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Map in the CPPs so that the Lower Green River Valley APD does not appear within the PAA boundaries of any jurisdiction. Recommendation #3. Amend the Urban Growth Area map by drawing the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley. APD.. This is to clarify its classification as long- term resource land, and to emphasize that although it is located west of the main urban-rural J boundary line, it is not considered urban. King County Council Actions In 1999, the King County Council amended the King County Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the GMPC recommendations contained in Motion 99-3, by adopting policies R- 513 and R-544 (see below), and by drawing the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley APD (see Attachment 2). R-513 Designated Forest and Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by cities. R-544 The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District functions as an urban separator between the cities of Kent and Auburn. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as appropriate. In 2000, the King County Council further amended the King County Comprehensive Plan by adopting Policy R-543, which also supports the GMPC's recommendations in Motion 99-3: R-543 King County commits to preserve Agricultural Production District parcels in or near the Urban Growth Area because of their high production capabilities, their proximity to markets, and their value as open space. Finally, in 2001 the King County Council considered the adoption of Proposed Ordinance 2002- 0256, which would have amended the CPPs consistent with the recommendations of the GMPC and with the changes already made to the King County Comprehensive Plan. However, because the County was engaged in negotiations to purchase certain properties within the Lower Green River Valley APD, and out of concerns that the GMPC had adopted their recommendations in the absence of a quorum and without an adequate public review process, the Council did not adopt the Proposed Ordinance. Instead, the Council adopted Motion 11208 (see Attachment 3), which remanded the GMPC motion back to the GMPC for further review and reconsideration. Motion 11208 also directed the County Executive to complete negotiations with property owners in the Lower Green River Valley APD in the earliest possible timeframe. On September 26, 2001 the GMPC reconsidered its actions with respect to Motion 99-3, and via the adoption of Motion 01-2, reaffirmed those actions. On November 20, 2002 King County executed the fee simple purchase of what is known as the Nelson property in the Lower Green River Valley APD, thus fulfilling the second mandate of Motion 11208. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~2003-0127 (CPP Amendments - Lower Green River Valley APD)(3-18-O3).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM With these two actions complete, the King County Council is asked to consider once again amending the Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by the GMPC in Motions 99-3 and 01-2. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: Adding policies LU-2A and LU-2B addressing the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts; · Amending the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map to illustrate that the Lower Green River Valley APD is not within the PAA of any jurisdiction; and · Amending the land use map in the CPPs to illustrate that the Lower Green River Valley APD is outside the boundaries of the Urban Growth Area. Additionally, the 'ordinance would ratify the changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FWol. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127, with attachments 2. Map: Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District 3. King County Motion 11208, Adopted May 21, 2000 EXHIBIT__ Iff, PAGE C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~003-0127 (CPP Amendments - Lower Green River Valley APD)(3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM MEETING DATE: August 5, 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on Solid Waste Issues CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum and Attachments from the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee's July 22, 2003 meeting. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Suburban Cities Association [SCA] is coordinating City review of and response to King County's Solid Waste Management system changes. On July 10, 2003, the SCA Board voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the attached Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on SolM Waste Issues [Memorandum of Intent]. The Memorandum of Intent provides a framework for Cities to negotiate with King County on a range of Solid Waste issues, including waste export, transfer station configurations, service reductions (for self-haulers and County transfer station operating hours), and amendment of the Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement. Before their respective June 30, 2003 "opener" deadlines, fifteen suburban cities issued notice of intent to the County Executive to amend the existing SWIA. The initial response from the County Executive regarding amending the SWIA is due before the end of July 2003. Negotiations are anticipated to follow, with the Suburban City negotiation team established as set forth in the Memorandum of Intent. Federal Way's Public Works Director, Cary Roe, is a likely participant on this negotiation team. The intent is for negotiations to include a "most favored nations" clause, meaning that improvements to the SWIA would be provided to all Cities. The Memorandum of Intent also includes an assessment of Suburban Cities (totaling $80,000.00) for use in supplemental legal and financial review of related documentation, as needed. Federal Way's portion of the assessment amount totals approximately $9,224.00. These funds will come from the Solid Waste/Recycling Fund. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At their July 22, 2003 meeting, the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee (FEDRAC) forwarded the Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on Solid Waste Issues to the August 5, 2003 City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation of granting the City Manager authority to execute the Memorandum PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for City Council adoption of the recommendation granting the City Manager authority to execute the Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on Solid Waste Issues." k:\council\agdbillsL2003\0805 sw collaboration moi.doc (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # IsT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 072203 k:\council\agdbillsL2003\0805 sw collaboration moi.doc 13June 2003 Suburban Cities Association 6300 Southcenter Bouievard, Suite 206 Tuk, wila 'Washington 98188 Phone 206 433 7168 Fax 206 242 8076 Emaii $ca@$uburbancitie$.org Cynthia Sullivan, Chair Metropolitan King County Council King County Court House 516 Third Avenue, 12th Floor Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Councilmember Sullivan: We have received a copy Proposed Ordinance 2003-0254.1 which would appropriate over $8 million from the solid waste enterprise fund for the purpose of purchasing the Fisher Flour Mills property, to be the site of an intermodal export facility for solid waste. We understand that the Council will discuss and perhaps take action on this motion shortly. For the past several months, the County Executive, through the Solid Waste Division, has been advancing a variety of proposals concerning solid waste services, including the transfer of $7 million from the solid waste enterprise fund to the County's general fund and execution of a variety of actions in preparation for a solid waste export facility. There have been broad statements made about the continuing role of King County in controlling export and thereby assuring competitiveness in solid waste services after closure of the landfill in 2012. The purchase of the Fisher Flour Mills property would be the first step in implementation of the Executive's plan. The disposal of solid waste in cities outside of Seattle is controlled by an interlocal contract, by the King County Solid Waste Comprehensive Master Plan and by state statute. At present, the Executive's proposals are being reviewed through the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, the Solid Waste Policy Work Group and by cities individually for consistency with controlling authorities and for operational and policy implications. Based on information available to us, the purchase of the Fisher Flour Mills property may be a prudent action, taking current advantage of an opportunity to acquire property which may prove useful to the utility later on. We do not yet have agreement on the conclusions advanced by the Executive concerning waste export. The County and all cities outside of Seattle are partners in the system of collection, transport and disposal of solid waste from our residents and businesses. Therefore, we have a shared responsibility to take actions which are in the best interests of the affected ratepayers, including planning for eventual waste export. The Hon. Cynthia Sullivan, Chair .lune 13, 2003 Page 2 of 2 We would encourage you, as part of your consideration of the Fisher Flour Mills purchase, to also consider amendments to the ordinance which would make clear that the authorization to purchase land for the benefit of the utility does not constitute an endorsement of any other element of the Executive's proposals concerning waste export. Further, we would encourage you to consult with cities in identifying the appropriate processes to be undertaken in assessing and evaluating the Executive's proposals. Sincerely, Steve Mullet. Mayor, City of Tukwila and Co-chair, Management Board Jim White, Mayor, City of Kent and Co-chair, Intercity Cooperation Policy Board Larry Springer, Mayor, City of Kirkland and Co-chair, Management Board Sonny Putter, Councilmember, City of Newcastle and Co-chair, Intercity Cooperation Policy Board CC: All Member Cities Mayor Greg Nickels, Seattle Mayor Connie Marshall, Bellevue Councilmember .lulia Patterson, Chair, Regional Policy Committee C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\GWViewer~SWMKCCJune 1303.doc DRAFT Memorandum of Tntent to Collaborate on Solid Waste ]:ssues 1. Context and Purpose The King County Executive has made a variety of proposals affecting the solid waste utility which may have the effect of impacting the rights and responsibilities of the 38 cities with existing interlocal contracts for solid waste transfer and disposal services with King County. In considering the potential impacts of these proposals on cities and on ratepayers, the cities wish to realize the efficiencies and cost savings in collaboration, in addition to the benefit of integrated policy decisions for the region. Some cities have chosen to exercise a review and renegotiation term in the existing interlocal contracts with a 2003 anniversary date. Many issues arising under the Executive's proposals may be discussed and resolved within the context of the review and renegotiation process. Cities without currently effective review and renegotiation terms wish to take advantage of the opportunity to develop potential contract changes that will be of equal benefit to them. Cities may wish to consider other collaborative actions, such as a request to King County or to the State Department of Ecology for reopening of the comprehensive plan, formal input to the Metropolitan King County Council directly or through the Regional Policy Committee, or development of alternatives or options for solid waste transfer and disposal services. Suburban Cities Association, through its board of directors, has sanctioned this collaboration as dealing appropriately with both policy and administrative issues raised by the Executive's proposals and recommends participation by all cities with contracts with King County for solid waste transfer and disposal services. This memorandum sets out the roles and responsibilities, processes and goals for the collaboration, hereafter 'the project'. 2. Roles and Responsibilities 2.1 Participating Cities -- Any city receiving solid waste transfer and disposal services from King County may participate in this project by concurrence of their legislative body and/or mayor. No membership in Suburban Cities Association is required to participate in this project. Participating cities are expected to 2.1.1 act in good faith in support of this project and its goals for a period of six months, until December 31, 2003, including contribution to costs; 2.1.2 communicate to the principal work groups described here the city's interests and issues in the solid waste delivery system~ including potential solutions; 2.1.3 refrain from separate negotiations with any county staff or elected officials on these matters, without prior notice to the other participating cities; 2.1.4 identify one or more individuals to serve on the Solid Waste Oversight Group and identify possible participants in the SWPAG and SWNG, described below. 2.2 Solid Waste Oversight Group - Each participating city will identify one or more staff to serve on the Solid Waste Oversight Group. These individuals are expected to 2.2.1 elicit policy direction, interests and issues from their city's elected officials and convey it to the SWPAG and SWNG, described below; 2.2.2 review materials associated with this project, attend meetings where needed and give feedback to the SWPAG and SWNG, where needed; 2.2.3 report to their city's mayors, councils or staff, as may be required, included presenting policy materials or potential contracts for discussion and action. C:\WINDOW$\TEMP\GWViewer\SW Collab Agmt .July 2003.doc 2.3. Solid Waste Policy Advisory Group - After soliciting input from participating cities, the officers of SCA will identify six to eight elected officials to serve as the SWPAG and will identify these officials to all participating cities. These elected officials do not have to be from SCA member cities. The SWPAG shall include elected officials with the following interests: · at least one official serving on the Regional Policy Committee, · at least one official from a city with a future contract anniversary date, · at least one official from a city without a transfer station, · at least two officials from cities with transfer stations. The SWPAG will 2.3.1 oversee the work of the Solid Waste Negotiating Group for purposes of ensuring consistency with project goals, including approval of the team lead and approval of any resource contracts; 2.3.2. communicate with other city elected officials with interests in this issue, including individual city councils, mayors and the SCA Management Board, as may be appropriate; 2.3.3 where consistent with the group strategy being executed by the SWNG, communicate with county elected officials, including the County Executive and County Councimembers, as may be required. 2.4 Solid Waste Negotiating Group - The three participating cities with the highest population may, at their option, appoint a staff member to serve on the SWNG. Then ,the officers of SCA, after soliciting input from the participating cities and concurrence of supervisors, will identify a staff team of no more than seven members, including any appointees from the most populous participating cities, and identification of the team lead. The Solid Waste Negotiating Group will 2.4.:~ create a timeline, identifying cumulative issues, outcomes desired and strategies for accomplishing those outcomes, representing cities in the review and rengotiation process; 2.4.2 work with the SWPAG and county staff and elected officials, agree to a meeting schedule and timeline that ensures that the parties' mutual interests, at both the executive and legislative level, can be dealt with simultaneously; 2.4.3 reciprocally communicate with the SWOG and with the SWPAG, consistent with the roles of those groups; 2.4.4 provide support and assistance to the SWPAG, to the extent that elected officials must communicate with county elected officials on these issues; 2.4.5 provide for the identification, selection and contracting for any support services deemed necessary to the effort and approved by the SWPAG, through the fiscal agent. 3. Budqet, Coordination and Timeline Budget: An assessment of $80,000 will be made to support this collaboration, and apportioned to participating cities according to OFM April 2003 population figures. This assessment will cover the cost of all anticipated support services for this collaboration, which will be primarily in the form of legal support or advice. The Suburban Cities Association will act as the fiscal agent for the purposes of this collaboration, consistent with its fiscal powers under RCW 24.03 and its articles of incorporation. SCA will not use its assessment authority under its Bylaws, Article VII, unless later determined by the Management Board and approved by a majority · of the membership, as provided therein. Any balance remaining after completion of the project will be returned to the cities proportionately. C:\W[NDOWS\TEHP\GWViewer\SW Collab Agmt.luly 2003.doc CQ:~ 2 3.2 Coordination: SCA will act as coordinating agent and will keep project documents, including the following records for the project, available to all participating cities: c 3.2.1. Financial records, including any contracts for service; 3.2.2. Current communications lists, email group, fax and phone information for all participants in the collaboration, SWOG, SWPAG, SWNG; 3.2.3. An 'essential parties' list, including contact information for negotiating personnel from all parties, contract resources and constituent groups; 3.2.4. A list of all calendared meetings and records of notices to affected parties; 3.2.5. An index of all documents created or distributed through the effort, including electronic copies of such documents, where available. 3.3 Timeline: The SWNG will develop a timeline, identifying milestones for reports to SWPAG and SWOG, anticipating resolution of all issues within six months, or by December 31, 2003. Should that date pass with issues outstanding, then the SWNG will present to the $WPAG and SWOG the reasons for the delay and a plan for bringing the project to completion. 4. Goalf Outcomes and Work Products 4.1 Goal: The goal of this project is to ensure that plans and action for future solid waste transfer and disposal services are in the best interest of the ratepayers and the region, whether undertaken by King County, the cities or other entities. 4.2 Outcomes and Work Products: Each outcome for this project will be will be accompanied by a written work product. Initially, expected outcomes are as follows: 4.2.:[ Agreement on amendments or revisions to the interlocal contract with King County which are acceptable to both cities and to the county; 4.2.2 Agreement on amendment or revisions to the comprehensive plan which may be needed in light of the executive's proposals or agreements concerning the interlocal contract; 4.2.3 Development of options or alternatives for solid waste transfer and disposal which may be available in the future, and the conditions under which cities should consider exercising those options. ! have read the Memorandum of ]~ntent to Collaborate on Solid Waste !ssues and agree to its terms on behalf of my city. ! understand that my city is not obligated to accept any contract terms that may be produced during this project and that the elected officials of my jurisdiction have sole authority to accept or reject any contract terms. As a participating city, ! commit to fulfilling the responsibilities described in Section 2.1. Mayor/Manager/Administrator City Printed Name Date C:\W[NDOW$\TEHP\GWViewer\SW Collab Agmt .luly 2003.doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Via: From: Subject: July 22, 2003 Michael Park, Chair Finance, Econom,i.c Devel~opment and Regional Affairs Committee David H. Mo~nager Cary M. Roe, e.l~)~eublic Works Director Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste and Recycling Coordinator Regional Solid Waste System & Solid Waste Collaboration Agreement BACKGROUND: At the March 25, 2003 and May 27, 2003 FEDRAC meetings, the Committee considered several topics relating to the region's Solid Waste. These topics, with brief updates, follow: King County proposes charging an annual $7 million "rent" charge (with inflator) for use of Cedar Hills landfill. The County's solid waste utility (King County Solid Waste Division) proposes generating this rent by cutting services and staff, and also by reducing the "Regional Direct Fee" margin that provides private haulers an incentive to bypass closer County facilities and instead use their private transfer stations. The County has earmarked the $7 million for human services programming - potentially offsetting budget cuts required by the County's current fiscal crises. Ratepayers would continue to pay this amount to the County as part of solid waste tipping fees, while the County's solid waste utility will offset this loss in operational budget through reduced services and other cost cutting measures within their utility. Questions have arisen regarding the County's ability to engage in this practice, along with the amount of the "rent" charge, and the State Auditor is now investigating the basis for the County's proposal. Their opinion is expected before the end of September 2003. Cedar Hills landfill closes in approximately 10 years, and King County is planning its role in waste export, with their first step purchasing property for an intermodal rail access facility. On July 14, 2003 the County Council voted to make this purchase, with stipulations including an independent, third-party review of competitive waste export alternatives (focusing on use of private sector services), and a commitment to dispose of this property through competitive sale, should County development of this intermodal facility be stopped. These stipulations were sought via a letter to the King County Council Chair dated June 13, 2003 signed by the Suburban Cities Association's [SCA] four co-chairs (copy attached). The Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement [SWIA] grants solid waste "Flow Control" to the County, and sets the respective roles of haulers and Cities. Cities are now pressing for amendments to the SWIA, and the SCA is now engaged in fostering coordination of City negotiations with King County (see the following section for details). DISCUSSION: The Suburban Cities Association [SCA] is coordinating City review of and response to King County's Solid Waste Management system changes. On July 10, 2003, the SCA Board voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the attached Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on Solid Waste Issues [Memorandum of Intent]. The Memorandum of Intent provides a framework for Cities to negotiate with King County on a k:\fedc\2003\re~'ional ,~wi ...... ii.doc ~ ''~ Pa~e 1 O1'2 range of Solid Waste issues, including waste export, transfer station configurations, service reductions (for self-haulers and County transfer station operating hours), and amendment of the Solid Waste Interlocal Agreement. Before their respective June 30, 2003 "opener" deadlines, fifteen suburban cities issued notice of intent to the County Executive to amend the existing SWIA. The initial response from the County Executive regarding amending the SWIA is due before the end of July 2003. Negotiations are anticipated to follow, with the Suburban City negotiation team established as set forth in the Memorandum of Intent. Federal Way's Public Works Director, Cary Roe, is a likely participant on this negotiation team. The intent is for negotiations to include a "most favored nations" clause, meaning that improvements to the SWIA would be provided to all Cities. The Memorandum of Intent also includes an assessment of Suburban Cities (totaling $80,000.00) for use in supplemental legal and financial review of related documentation, as needed. Federal Way's portion of the assessment amount totals approximately $9,224.00. These funds will come from the Solid Waste/Recycling Fund. COMMITTEE ACTION: Staff makes the following recommendation: The Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee recommends granting the City Manager authority to execute a Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on Solid Waste Issues, in accordance with the intent of the attached draft Memorandum in a form approved by the City Attorney. The Committee's recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Council Consent Agenda of August 5, 2003, with a recommendation for adoption. ~OVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION: - RV:ss Attachments: June 13, 2003 Letter from SCA Co-Chairs to Cynthia Sullivan, King County Council Chair SCA Memorandum of Intent to Collaborate on Solid Waste Issues k:\fedc\2003\reeional sw issues ii.doc Page 2 of 2 MEETING DATE: August 5, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: West Hylebos Creek Trail Feasibility Project CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated July 11, 2003; West Hylebos Creek Trail Feasibility Project SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The Hylebos Drainage Basin is a significant local and regional environmental resource within the City of Federal Way. Federal Way has identified Hylebos Creek and the associated West Hylebos Wetland as resources in need of both protecting and restoring. The Parks and Recreation Commission held two public meetings to solicit input from the community and from the property owners whom would be directly impacted by the proposed trail.The Parks and Recreation Commission held two public meetings to solicit input from the community and from the property owners whom would be directly impacted by the proposed trail. After reviewing the survey results, citizen input and reviewing the City's policy on trails, the Parks Commission passed a motion at their February 6th meeting to not pursue consideration of a trail system in the West Hylebos Creek. Their decision not to pursue the trail was based on the following findings: 1) Insufficient public support for a trail that would link neighborhoods and connect to the overall citywide park system. 2) To minimize impact to thc natural habitat a trail would be limited to 5 feet wide, which does not conform to the city's trail standard ora 12 foot wide trail. 3) Trail would not be visible from surrounding properties and roadways, preventing site lincs into thc trail and potentially posing an un-safe condition to users. 4) The amount of transient activity throughout this open space poses un-safe conditions to users. The Parks Commission is however, in support of stream restoration and acquisition as components to stewardship, protection and education of this unique resource. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to recommend a "do pass" to the City Council to accept the Parks Commissions recommendation to not pursue a trail system at this time in the West Hylebos Creek. Forward to Full Council on August 5, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval to not puruse a trail system at this time in the West Hylebos Creek." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW 70 BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIl, ACTION: [-1 AI'PROVEI) [] I)ENI El) [] TAB1.ED/DEFERREI)/NO ACTION [] MOVE/) TO SECOND READING (ordinances on/y) REVISED - 05/10/2001 COUNCIL B1LL # IsT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: July 11,2003 PRHSPS Council Committee/,~ ~ ..... , Jennifer Schrode,~{l~irector ~ ~/' David Mo~~sX4VIan~er West Hylebos ~reck Trail Feasibility Project The purpose of this memorandum is to forward to the City Council the Parks Commissions findings and recommendation to not pursue a trail system in the West Hylebos Creek basin. The following summarizes the history of the project, the community input and the commission's basis for its recommendation. Project Background The Hylebos Drainage Basin is a significant local and regional environmental resource within the City of Federal Way. Federal Way has identified Hylebos Creek and the associated West Hylebos Wetland as resources in need of both protecting and restoring. Historically, Hylebos Creek has provided locally, significant habitat for many different aquatic species including salmonoids such as Chinook salmon. Federal Way, King County, Washington State Parks and local community activist groups have worked together to develop the West Hylebos Wetlands State Park, one of the headwaters to Hylebos Creek. Federal Way's Surface Water Utility and Parks Department are exploring opportunities to co-develop a management plan for a portion of the creek system that will maximize resource utilization consistent with common goals such as public education, involvement and recreation. CH2MHILL, working with Bruce Dccs and Associates was sclcctcd to assist in thc development of a long range planning document for Surface Water Utility stream restoration/preservation needs and to explore the feasibility for a trail within the corridor of thc West Hylebos Creek as a component of the City's trail system. Bruce Dees, and Associates (Bruce Dees) conducted the trail feasibility element covering the Hylebos Creek Corridor within the City of Federal Way along the west fork from the power line trail north around the Wetlands of the West Hylebos State Park and south to 373rd with potential connections identified. Projects Public Process Summary The Parks and Recreation Commission held two public meetings to solicit input from the community and from the property owners whom would be directly impacted by the proposed trail. Thc mcetings were hcld on September 5 and October 3. Comments have been primarily of concern of having a trail in a secluded area, and opposition toward any proposal to connect trail access from the neighborhoods to the west of the creek. Based on the public comments received, the Parks Commission asked staff to develop a trail survey that would solicit feedback on the community needs for trails, including feedback on the purpose(s) the community will use trails. The commission was concerned that in order to make a recommendation on whether to support the proposed trail in the West Hylebos Creek basin, better understanding is needed of how the proposed trail fits comprehensively with the citywide community vision/needs for trails. The Trail Survey was conducted for four weeks (Nov 22 - Dec 20th). Survey was mailed to all citizens that attended public meetings on the trail and posted on the city's web site. Total of 196 surveys were received. A copy of the survey results is included with this update. Commissions findings and recommendation After reviewing the survey results, citizen input and reviewing the City's policy on trails, the Parks Commission passed a motion at their February 6th meeting to not pursue consideration of a trail system in the West Hylebos Creek. Their decision not to pursue the trail was based on the following findings: 1) Insufficient public support for a trail that would link neighborhoods and connect to the overall citywide park system. 2) To minimize impact to thc natural habitat a trail would be limJtcd to 5 feet wide, which does not conform to the city's trail standard ora 12 foot wide trail. 3) Trail would not be visible from surrounding properties and roadways, preventing site lines into thc trail and potentially posing an un-safe condition to users. 4) The amount of transient activity throughout this open space poses un-safe conditions to users. The Parks Commission is however, in support of stream restoration and acquisition as components to stewardship, protection and education o£this unique resource. Committee Reeommend ation.' Motion to recommend a "do pass" to the City Council to accept the Parks Commissions recommendation to not pursue a trail system in the West Hylebos Creek. f'-,~,~ ~ ~ ,,...t,~,~,~,~', APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ~__x~mmittee Chair Committee Member CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Request for Street Vacation of Portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT [] ORDINANCE Amount Budgeted: $ [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING Expenditure Amt.: $ [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER ContingencyReq'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Land Use/Transportation Committee dated July 7, 2003 and Resolution SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Brad and Mary Jo McHenry have petitioned the City to vacate a portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive, located between SW Dash Point Road and 28th Avenue SW. (See the accompanying map of the area to be vacated for exact location.) The area requested for vacation is in two sections. The southern portion is unopened Right-of-Way that has been partially maintained by the abutting property owners and in some portions the property owner to the west has encroached upon the Right-of-Way with a fence. This portion is abutted by SW Dash Point Road to the south, a single private property to the west, 28th Avenue SW to the north, and two private properties to the east. The northern portion is unopened Right-of-Way that has been partially maintained by the property owner who owns both properties, east and west of the area proposed for vacation. The northern section also abuts Poverty Bay Park on the north end, and 28th Avenue SW to the south. The Right-of-Way width for both portions of Puget Sound Marine View Drive is Eighty-feet (80'). The areas in which the Right-of-Way is located are zoned Residential 15.0 and are listed as Single Family, Medium Density in the Comprehensive Plan. The street vacation is being sought by abutting property owners, as they believe the Right-of-Way will never be developed and thus want the existing Right-of-Way to have the ability to subdivide, build home additions or garages. The area to be vacated has four (4) abutting private property owners, all of which have signed the petition. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At their July 7, 2003 meeting, the Land Use and Transportation Committee recommended approval of the Resolution setting the Public Hearing for September 2, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for City Council approval of the Resolution setting the Public Hearing for September 2, 2003." .....__......_.L_._.______._ CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 CITY OF Federal Way DATE: July 7, 2003 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use / Transportation Committee FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: Marwan Salloum, Street Systems Manager David H.~anager Request for Street Vacation of Portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive BACKGROUND Brad and Mary Jo McHenry have petitioned the City to vacate a portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive, located between SW Dash Point Road and 28th Avenue SW. (See the accompanying map of the area to be vacated for exact location.) The area requested for vacation is in two sections. The southern portion is unopened Right-of-Way that has been partially maintained by the abutting property owners and in some portions the property owner to the west has encroached upon the Right-of-Way with a fence. This portion is abutted by SW Dash Point Road to the south, a single private property to the west, 28th Avenue SW to the north, and two private properties to the east. The northern portion is unopened Right-of-Way that has been partially maintained by the property owner who oxvns both properties, east and west of the area proposed for vacation. The northern section also abuts Poverty Bay Park on the north end, and 28th Avenue SW to the south. The Right-of-Way width for both portions of Puget Sound Marine View Drive is Eighty-feet (80'). The areas in which the Right-of-Way is located are zoned Residential 15.0 and are listed as Single Family, Medium Density in the Comprehensive Plan. The street vacation is being sought by abutting property owners, as they believe the Right-of-Way will never be developed and thus want the existing Right-of-Way to have the ability to subdivide, build home additions or garages. The area to be vacated has four (4) abutting private property owners, all of which have signed the petition. ACTION The petitioners did not meet Mandatory Criteria #lb - The street, alley or portion thereof is no longer required for public use, Discretionary Criteria #2c - Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists, or Discretionary Criteria #2e - The vacation would not interfere with future development or access to other existing or future development, as set forth in FWCC Section 13-102 required for granting the vacation request. The reason the criteria were not met was due to the potential use of this Right-of-Way as a vehicular and/or pedestrian access to Poverty Bay Park, which will be master planned in 2005. Because the petitioners did not meet all of the criteria, staff recommends denial of the vacation request. See the attached staff report for further details. RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends denial of the requested street vacation and requests placing the attached resolution setting the time and date of the Public Hearing to be at the Council meeting on Au.~,ust49, 2003 at 7:00 p.m., on the ~3 Council consent agenda. ~5 ~. ~ffo k:\lutcL2003Xrequest for street vacation of portion of puget sound marine view drive.doc MS:ss cc: Project File Day File RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, REGARDING VACATION OF A PORTION OF PUGET SOUND MARINE VIEW DRIVE, LOCATED BETWEEN SW DASH POINT ROAD AND POVERTY BAY PARK, ABUTTING PUGET SOUND MARINE VIEW DRIVE AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE STREET VACATION. WHEREAS, a proper petition has been filed requesting vacation of a portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive, located between SW Dash Point Road and Poverty Bay Park, in the City of Federal Way, Washington, and as depicted on Exhibit A (vicinity map), attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the petition contains the signatures of the owners of at lease two-thirds of the private property abutting the portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive proposed to be vacated; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A public heating on the aforesaid vacation petition shall be held at the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 2, 2003, in the Council Chambers located within City Hall, 33530- 1 st Way South, Federal Way, Washington. Said hearing date is not more than sixty (60) days nor less than twenty (20) days after the date of the passage of this resolution. Section 2. The City Clerk shall give at least twenty (20) days notice of the hearing and cause the notice to be posted as provided by law. Section 3. The Public Works Director shall obtain the necessary approval or rejection of, or other information from the City departments, affected agencies, and utilities, fire and police agencies, and shall transmit such information to the City Council so that the matter can be considered by the Res. # , Page 1 City Council at the public heating on Tuesday, September 2, 2003. Section 4. Severabilit¥. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON this day of ,2003. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ATTEST: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: Revised: 6/11/03 KSresolution\street vacation. Puget Sound Marine View Dr Res. # , Page 2 306 ST PUGET SOUND MARINE VIEW DRIVE STREET VACATION EXHIBIT A FOR RESOLUTION .N Map Printed-June 23, 2003 Federal Way CityMap Note.- This map is intended fo( use as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its acc~,ra(:v City of Federal Way STAFF REPORT TO THE LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE PETITION FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF PUGET SOUND MARINE VIEW DRIVE Federal Way File No. 03-100466 DATE: June 23, 2003 PROPOSED ACTION: Petition for vacation of a portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive PETITIONER: Brad and Mary Jo McHenry LOCATION: See attached vicinity map REPORT PREPARED BY: John Mulkey, Street Systems Engineer RECOMMENDATION: Deny Street Vacation Request I. BACKGROUND Brad and Mary Jo McHenry have petitioned the City to vacate a portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive, located between SW dash Point Road and 28th Avenue SW and between 28~h Avenue SW. See the Street Vacation Petition (Exhibit A) and the accompanying map of the area to be vacated (Exhibit B) for exact location. The area requested for vacation is in two sections. The southern portion is unopened Right-of-Way that has been partially maintained by the abutting property owners and in some portions the property owner to the west has encroached upon the Right-of-Way with a fence. This portion is abutted by SW Dash Point Road to south, a single private property to the west, 28th Avenue SW to the north, and two private properties to the east. The northern portion is unopened Right-of-Way that has been partially maintained by property owner who owns both properties, east and west of the area proposed for vacation. The northern section also abuts Poverty Bay Park on the north end, and 28th Avenue SW to the South. The Right-of-Way width, for both portions of Puget Sound Marine View Drive is eighty (80) feet. There is no proposed street section for either portion of Right-of-Way, as shown in the City's comprehensive Plan. The areas in which the Right-of-Way areas are located are zoned Residential 15.0 and are listed as single family, Medium Density in the Comprehensive Plan. The street vacation is being sought by abutting property owners, as they believe the areas will never be developed, and want the existing property to have the ability to subdivide, build home additions or garages. The area to be vacated has four (4) abutting private property owners, all of which have signed the petition. II. COMPLIANCE WITH CRITERIA DESCRIBED IN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CODE (FWCC) SECTION 13-102 A. Mandatory Criteria: The following criteria are mandatory and must be met before a petition for a street vacation may be approved: Criteria #la - The vacation provides a public benefit or is for a public benefit. The benefit may include economic or business support that the community as a whole derives from the abutting property owner. 1 Puget Sound Marine View Drive Street Vacation Staff Report The land is not currently used or maintained by the City. The vacation of the portion of Puget Sound marine View Drive could provide a public benefit in that the land will be purchased and maintained by property owners. The vacation would benefit the property owners in that they would have more property and allow for possible sub division or improvements to their respective properties. Criteria #lb - The street, alley or portion thereof is no longer required for public use. These areas encompass unopened Right-of-Way, which have not been used for access to any other areas, Although the Comprehensive Plan does not show this road to be opened to traffic the City Parks Department intends to begin planning development of Poverty Bay Park, which abuts the proposed area for vacation to the north. The Poverty Bay Park Master Plan is a 2005 funded project. As this right of way offers the potential for possible vehicular and/or pedestrian access to the park property, there is the potential for future public use of the property. Criteria #1 c - The vacation does not abut a body of water, such as a river, a lake, or salt water, except for a public purpose such as a park or port facility and which reverts to a public authority. This Right-of-Way is not located in the vicinity of a body of water, therefore this criteria is not applicable. B. Discretionary Criteria: Compliance with the following criteria is not mandatory, but the Council must consider them in making its decision. Criteria #2a - The vacation meets the intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan's general purposes and objectives. The City's Comprehensive Plan has no requirements for future roads in the locations proposed for vacation. The areas in which the Right-of-Way areas are located are zoned Residential 15.0 and are listed as single family, Medium Density in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed vacation area abuts Poverty Bay Park, which is planned for development in the future. Possible future pedestrian and/or vehicular access to the Park could be made through this Right-of-Way. Criteria #2b - The vacation provides for an exchange of public property in the public interest~ There is no exchange of public property associated with this vacation petition. Criteria #2c - Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists. The City Parks Department intends to begin planning development of Poverty Bay Park, which abuts the proposed are for vacation to the north, beginning in 2005. With development of the park property this area may be used to provide pedestrian and/or vehicular access to the park. This change in future conditions could provide a greater use and need for this property than currently exists if this route is selected as an access route to the park. Criteria #2d - Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the same. As all abutting private property owners have signed the petition, this criteria is not applicable. Puget Sound Marine View Drive Street Vacation Staff Report Criteria #2e - The vacation wouM not interfere with future development or access to other existing or future developments. The vacation could interfere with future access and development of Poverty Bay Park, if this Right-of-Way was chosen as a pedestrian and/or vehicular access route to the park. Qwest has notified the City they currently have utilities within the proposed vacation area. Lakehaven Utility District is proposing future utilities in this area as well. The existing and proposed utilities must be granted easements through the property before vacation is allowed. III. PAYMENT As per RCW 35.79.030, Section 1, because the property has been part of a dedicated public Right-of-Way for over twenty five (25) years, having been conveyed to King County in 1930, the full amount of the appraised value (based on an appraisal acceptable to the City) of the land would be required as payment to the City if the proposed vacation is approved. IV. RECOMMENDATION Mandatory Criteria lb and Discretionary Criteria 2c and 2e have not been met as per the potential to develop this area as an access to Poverty Bay Park. Staffrecommends the petition for vacation of a portion of Puget Sound Marine View Drive not be approved until such time as the decision for access into Poverty Bay Park has been determined. If the vacation petition is granted, the vacation should not be approved until all current and proposed utilities are granted easements through the property. kSstreetsXstreet vacation\puget sound marine view driveXfinal staff report.doc EXHIBIT A STREET and/or ALLEY VACATION and PETITION Dear Mayor and Federal Way City Council: We, the undersigned abutting property owners, hereby respectfully request that certain cc-9 ~ c~,v7 g/OT~,&- *>~ /C~'~£2-'JDv',°'-~/5'~2-~to-~/-/~--J ?"//Oq/~ hereby be vacated. (General Location) Legal Description Brief Statement Why Vacation is Being Sought Requi~dttachments~c,w~ Z ~e u~ ~U. ~ ~o~ Verificationastoownership: ~' ~ ~ ~¢~A~I~O ~ ~o~c ..... ~rporatio~artn¢rship (ff ~pplicabl¢) Pr~ of individu~l'~ ~uthori~ to si~ on behalf of ~rporatio~armership shall be submitted. At~aCh ~ ¢olor-cMCd map o~ a scale not le~s than 1" = 2~' o~ the a~¢a sought ~or va~tion. *Note: Map must corres~nd with legal desc~ption. Application &¢ Abutting Property Owners' Tax Lot # Signatures and Addresses Lot, Block & Plat/Sec. Twn. RG o,'t-,~ / ,2 ,~ 49~-i, 9',tal, [~eco 54qofr./ I,-'2aqT lV% .. n 4 4, ~ l~Mn~e -?-0g'~t-lo°-g0oP2/ ....... ff_.. ~ r--L- · v, ~ /3 _ Zor :2. i~z ~ O,z-,~ I~o>- .o~/..o-~, ,,~,.,o.~:a-or,/ _3Gq,>0 Fee Paid Appraisal Fee Paid Land Value Paid. Deed Accepted Trade Accepted Treasurer's Receipt No. O ,~-OO9~oq Treasurer's Receipt No. Treasurer's Receipt No. Date: Date: K:k~TREETS~ROW~Vacadon Process.doc 306 ST PUGET SOUND MARINE VIEW DRIVE STREET VACATION EXHIBIT B N Map Printed-Mar 26 2003 Federal Way CityMap Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only. Map made by .-KCM The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Cancellation of August 19, 2003 Regular Council Meeting CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: None SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: For the past several years, the City Council has canceled its second meeting in August for summer break. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to suspend Council Rules of Procedure for the purpose of canceling the August 19, 2003 regular meeting" (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinaaces oal~) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Steel Lake Soccer Field Renovation/Bid Award CATEGORY: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIl, BUSINESS [] OTHER BUDGET IMPACT: Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $800000.00 $729887.01 $ 51092.09 ATTACHMENTS: None SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The City has a budget of $800,000 to renovate the soccer field at Steel Lake Park using artificial turf. Of this amount $400,000 is from a grant from IAC and $100,000 is from the Federal Way Soccer Association. The City publicly advertised the project and received three bids, which were opened on July 23, 2003. The bid amounts, including Washington State Sales Tax, are as follows: 1. Athletic Fields, Inc. 2. Road Construction Northwest 3. Ohno Construction $706,345.92 $773,994.28 $775,961.60 Athletic Fields, Inc. of Issaquah, Washington is the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Two bid alternates were also included in the bid package. Staff is recommending acceptance of the bid alternates, bringing the total construction cost to $729,887.01. All expected costs are itemized below. Bid Amount: Bid Alternates: Total Contract: $706,345.92 $ 23,541.09 $729,887.01 7 % Contingency: $ 51,092.09 Goal/Nets: $ 8,380.01 A/E Costs: $ 10,640.89 TOTAL PROJECT: $800,000.00 These amounts will keep the project within the approved budget. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Council Committee has not reviewed this project because the next committeee meeting is August 11, and the next Council Meeting is September 2. Therefore, to begin construction in a timely manner, the Committee has approved placing this item before the full Council on August 5, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to award the bid to renovate the Steel Lake Soccer Field to Athletic Fields, Inc., for $729,887.01, including bid alternates, and to provide a contingency as described above." (BIz'LOW TO BE COMPLETED B Y CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # lsT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 MEETING DATE: August 5, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Amendments to Chapter 22 (Zoning) of the Federal Way Municipal Code to Address Regulations For Churches In Single Family Residential Zones (Amending Ordinance No. 03-443) CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [] CONSENT [] ORDINANCE [] RESOLUTION [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [] OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt.: $ Contingency Req'd: $ ATTACHMENTS: 1) Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit A. 2) July 2, 2003, Memorandum to the Land Use/Transportation Committee (LUTC) with Exhibits A-C. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Ordinance No. 03-443 was adopted by the City Council on May 20, 2003, and became effective on May 29, 2003. At the time that it was being forwarded to the codifier, staff realized that there were several typographical errors on Use Zone Chart, Section 22-635, relating to churches in Single Family Residential Zones. Note 3 pertaining to allowing a rectory on-site and Note 4 requiring the church site to be adjacent to a collector or right-of-way had been inadvertently struck out, and language relating to facade length, that was intended to be struck out, had been retained. The attached Ordinance (Attachment 1) would correct these errors. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the proposed corrections during a public meeting on July 7, 2003. At that meeting, the LUTC recommended forwarding the Adoption Ordinance with the corrected Use Zone Chart (Exhibit A) to the full Council for first reading on August 5, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the corrections to Ordinance No. 03-443 to second reading on September 2, 2003." (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: [] APPROVED [] DENIED [] TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION [] MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST READING ENACTMENT READING ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # K:\CD Planning\Design Guidelines & Definition of Height\City Council\080503 AGENDA BILL.DOC/07/29/2003 3:43 PM ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (ZONING) OF THE FEDERAL WAY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADDRESS REGULATIONS FOR CHURCHES IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES (AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 03-443) WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July 1996, which significantly revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 (Zoning); and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 03-443 on May 20, 2003, amending FWCC Chapter 22 relating to design guidelines and definition of height; and WHEREAS, typographical errors were made in Ordinance No. 03-443, and the City Council wishes to correct the mistakes by adopting a corrected version of Ordinance No. 03-443; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendment is consistent with intent and purpose of FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the general public; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment. FWCC, Chapter 22, Section 635 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Section 2. Severabili _ty. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Ord No. , Page 1 Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ., 2003. APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor, Jeanne Burbidge City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Patricia A. Richardson FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO: K:\CD Planning~Design Guidelines & Definition of Height\City Council\Correction to Ordinance 03-443.doc/07/29/2003 3:42 PM Ord No. , Page 2 EXHIBIT A Sec. 22-635. Churches, etc. The followin~ uses shall be permitted in the single family residential (RS) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: .... Z~)NE USE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use... THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS MAXIMUMS Z REQUIRED YARDS ~ ~ ZONE m m ~ © ~ c~ ~ m<:a~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Church, Process As 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 75% 30 ft. A 1. Minimum lot size per dwelling unit is as follows: synagogue IV established above transportation a. In RS 35.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 35,000 sq. ft. or other on the See notes 3 - 6 average management b. In RS 15.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 15,000 sq. ft. )lace of See note zoning building plan (TMP) c. In RS 9.6 zones, the minimum lot size is 9,600 sq. ft. religious 2 map. elevation, shall be d. In RS 7.2 zones, the minimum lot size is 7,200 sq. ft. worship See note 1. submitted as e. In RS 5.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 5,000 sq. 2. If the subject property, along with any contiguous area intended for future use for the religious activities or related purposes, is more than 5 See notes part of the 5, 6, 7, application, acres, the use must obtain a master plan approved through Process IV. The master plan must show the ultimate development of the site and 8. The TMP including all buildings, parking and circulation areas, other major improvements and butters. For proposals also requiring a development agreement, the city council's public hearing on a development agreement shall take the place of the public hearing for master plan approval by shall address the hearing examiner. the following: 3. The subject property may contain a rectory or similar dwelling unit for use by the religious leader of the congregation, lfthis is a detached traffic dwelling unit~ its setbacks are as established for detached dwelling units in the zone. control, 4~ The subiect property must be adjacent to a collector or arterial right-of-way. demand and b. The faTa~ ~c,~ ..... ;~ ~r.~ ........... p~"~ '~ management, 4~ 5~ Maximum height of any portion of the building may be increased from 30 ft. to 40 ft., if all of the following are met: and traffic a. Ihe additional height is necessmy to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and movement to b. Each required yard abutting the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ft. the adjacent c. An increase in height shall not block views designated by the comprehensive plan. street system. 5:6~ Maximum height of the sanctuary or principal worship area may be increased to 55 ft., if all &the following criteria are met: a. Each required yard abutting the structure is increased one fi. for each one R. the structure exceeds 30 ft. above average building elevation. b. An increase in height shall not block views designated by the comprehensive plan. 6: 7~Architectural extensions of flat rooflines such as parapets and articulated cornices may exceed the 30 ft. base height limit by three fi. % 8~ Religious symbols, and icons for churches and other religious institutions may exceed the highest point of the underlying roof on which it is mounted by an additional 15 ft., provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is permitted on the principal structure for this use. 8: 9~ Parking may be located within required side and rear yards, but not closer than 15 ft. to any property line. 9. 10~Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. 14} 11~ Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriate requirements. 44~ 12~For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. ~ 13.For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. Process I, II, III and IV are described in §§ 22 2S~ 22 ~.! ! 22-351 - 22-356, For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22-411, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. 22-431 - 22-460; respectively. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. 22 ~.7~22 ~.9°,, reg=zztive!v. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(20.25), 2-27-90; Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B), 4-20-93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3,1 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-385, § 3, 4-3-01) K:\CD Planning~Design Guidelines & Definition of Height\City Council\Corrected Ordinance Sec 22-635.doc/07/29/2003 3:45 PM CITY OF ~ Federal Way MEMORANDUM July 2, 2003 TO: VIA: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING DATE: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use/Transportation Comp~ee (LUTC) David Moseley, City Manager(~ Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner Janet Shull, Planning Consultant Correction to Ordinance No. 03-443 -Design Guidelines and Definition of Height (FWCC, Section 22-635, Churches, etc.) July 7, 2003 I. BACKGROUND Ordinance No. 03-443 was adopted by the City Council on May 20, 2003 and became effective on May 29, 2003 (Exhibit A). At the time that it was being forwarded to the codifier, staff realized that Note 3 pertaining to allowing a rectory on-site and Note 4 requiring the church site to be adjacent to a collector or right-of-way had been inadvertently struck-out for single-family residential zones only (Exhibit B). This change was not intended to be adopted and was never presented nor discussed at the Planning Commission public hearings on March 5, and March 19, 2003 or at the Land Use Transportation public meeting on April 21, 2003. II. STAFF REQUEST Staff is requesting the LUTC to recommend to the City Council that the Use Zone Chart, FWCC, Section 22-635 as shown in Exhibit C be adopted in lieu of that version adopted as part of Ordinance 03 -443. IlL COUNCIL ACTION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Committee has the following options: I. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed correction as requested by staff. 2. Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve the proposed correction. 3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed correction. Staff recommends that the LUTC recommend to the full Council Option No. 1 above, that is, adopt the corrected language. IV. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows: As recommended by Planning Staff. As recommended by Planning Staff and amended by the LUTC. APPROV~ OF coMMiTTEE ACTION: fir Dean McCol LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Ordinance No. 03-443 with attachments Exhibit B FWCC, Section 22-636. Churches, etc. as adopted by Ordinance No. 03443 Exhibit C Proposed correction of FWCC, Section 22-636. Churches, etc. K:\CD Planning~Design Guidelines & Definition of Height\LUTC\070703 Memo RS Use Zone Chart Correction. DOC/07/02/20034:51 PM Amendments to Business Park Zoning Charts Follow-up Research File #03-101758-00-UP Page 2 EXHIBIT A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ORDINANCE NO. 03 - 443 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CHAPTER 22 (ZONING), ARTICLE XIX OF THE CITY CODE --DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEFINITION OF HEIGHT WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July 1996, which significantly revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 (Zoning); WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) relating to maximum fagade length, modulation, roof pitch, and other miscellaneous standards for institutional uses, and height for churches will provide for more flexibility and improved design options · for institutional buildings; WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that these code amendments will. implement and are consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these code amendments on March 5, and March 19, 2003, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered these code amendments on April 21, 2003, following which it recommended adoption of the text amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendments relating to maximum fagade length, modulation, roof pitch, and other miscellaneous standards for institutional uses, and height for churches are consistent with the intent and purpose of FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. Ord No. 03 -443, Page I ¢eP¥ Now, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIl. OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendments will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposal: 1. The proposed FWCC text amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUGI Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. LUP 6 Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the development review process. LUG 3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods. L UP15 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. The proposed amendments bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because they will result in more aesthetically pleasing institutional buildings throughout the City, while ensuring compatibility with adjacent residential areas. and The proposed amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City because they will supplement existing development standards and clarify various code sections. Clarification of City codes is in the best interests of the residents of the City. Section 3. Amendment. FWCC Chapter 22 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. Ord No. 03 -443, Page 2 Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 20 day of }lay ,2003. APPROVED: OR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CiTY ~LEKK' N. CHRISTINE G]LEEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO: 4/30/03 5/20/03 5/z4/03 5/Z9/03 03-663 K:\CD PlanningkDesign Guidelines & Definition of HeighfiLUTCkAdoption Ordinance.doc/04/29/2003 4:09 PM Ord No. 03 ./~6 3, Page 3 EXHIBIT A FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE Chapter 22, "Zoning" 22-1 Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Average building elevation (ABE) means a reference datum on the surface topog, aphy of a subject property from which building height is measured. The reference datum shall be a point no higher than five feet above the lowest elevation taken at any extetim Wall of the sh uctme either prim to any d~vclopment activity ut at finished grade, whichever iu lower, provided the ~efcmnce datum i~ equal to ut lower than the highest elevation at arty extel im wall of the att uctm e prior to development actlvity. ABE Js (he aversge of ~he ~est and lowest exJs0ng or proud e!evatJons~ whJ~ever Js lowest, tske. at the base of the ex!erJor ws!!s of the structuro; provided that ABE sh~!! not be grester than five feet ~bove the !ow~ Allowed Building Height Lowest Reference Highest Elevation datum (ABE) Elevation Height of structure means the vertical distance above the average building elevation measured to the highest point'of the copiug of a flat roof or to the deck line of a mansard roof, or to the aveiage height of the highest gable of a pitched m hipped ~oof mi -cl=prfi_n_t betw. ee_n cave and ridge of the hi~w. xt principal roof of a gable_hi_p, gambrel, or si_mi!ar sloped roof_ For s[,,_gle-fami_!y residential str,_,~ere the totalxoof ares_ of-dormers ~5 perce_n_t of the total ~rea of t_he under!yi_ng_slopedxoof, A~eighLwillIw._measuredAo thexidge of theAfighest pri__n_cipaLgable. Sections: 22-1630 22-1631 22-1632 22-1633 22-1634 22-1635 22-1636 22-1637 22-1638 22-1639 22-1640 Article XIX. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES Purpose. Administration. Applicability. Definitions. Site design - All zoning districts. Building design - All zoning districts. Building and pedestrian orientation - All zoning districts. Mixed-use residential buildings in commercial zoning districts. District guidelines. Design criteria for public on-site open space. Design for cluster residential subdivision lots. 22-1641 - 22-1650 Reserved. 22-1630 Purpose. The purpose of this article is to: (1) Implement community design guidelines by: a. Adopting design guidelines in accordance with land use and development policies established in the Federal Way comprehensive plan and in accordance with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Guidelines. b. Requiring minimum standards for design review to maintain and protect property values and enhance the general appearance of the city. c. Increasing flexibility and encouraging creativity in building and site design, while assuring quality development pursuant to the comprehensive plan and the purpose of this article. d. Achieving predictability in design review, balanced with administrative flexibility to consider the individual merits of proposals. e. Improving and expanding pedestrian circulation, public open space, and pedestrian amenities in the city. (2) Implement Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles by: a. Requiring minimum standards for design review to reduce the rate of crime associated with persons and property, thus providing for the highest standards of public safety. b. CPTED design principles are functionally grouped into the following three categories: 1. Natural Surveillance. This focuses on strategies to design the built environment in a manner that promotes visibility of public spaces and areas. 2. Access Control. This category focuses on the techniques that prevent and/or deter unauthorized and/or inappropriate access. 3. Ownership. This category focuses on strategies to reduce the perception of areas as "ownerless" and, therefore, available for undesirable uses. c. CPTED principles, design guidelines, and performance standards will be used during project development review to identify and incorporate design features that reduce opportunities for criminal activity to occur. The effectiveness of CPTED is based on the fact that criminals make rational choices about their targets. In general: I. The greater the risk of being seen, challenged, or caught; the less likely they are to commit a crime. 2. The greater the effort required, the less likely they are to commit a crime. 3. The lesser the actual or perceived rewards, the less likely they are to commit a crime. d. Through the use of CPTED principles, the built environment can be designed and managed to ensure: Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 2 1. There is more chance of being seen, challenged, or caught; 2. Greater effort is required; 3. The actual or perceived rewards are less; and 4. Opportunities for criminal activity are minimized. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99- 333, § 3, 1-19-99;'Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-1631 Administration. Applications subject to community design guidelines and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) shall be processed as a component of the governing land use process,.and the director of community development services shall have the authority to approve, modify, or deny proposals under that process. Decisions under this'article will consider' proposals on the basis of individual merit and will encourage creative design alternatives in order to achieve the stated purpose and objectives of this article. Decisions under this article are appealable using the appeal procedures of the applicable land use process. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16- 01) 22-1632 Applicability. This article shall apply to all commercial, office, ~d industrial development applications, ;" commerc[a! zones except single-family residential, subject to FWCC 22, Zonings. and v/h;~ch':.'ere subm[~ed for review .... ;.,~ ...... ~;~,~ ...... ; ...... ;~ ,~ ,~ ~c¢~,h,~ ~,~ ~c,~ ..... ~.,o Project proponents shall demonstrate how each CPTED design principle is met by the proposal, or why it is not relevant by either a wri~en explanation or by responding to a checklist prepared by the ciW. Subject applications for remodeling or expansion of existing developments shall meet only those provisions of this a~icle that are dete~ined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the area of expansion or remodeling, ~is a~icle in no way should be construed to supersede or modi~ any other ci~ codes, ordinances, or policies that apply to the proposal. (Ord. No. 96-271, ~ 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 97-291, ~ 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, ~ 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, ~ ~, ]-]~-0]} 22-1633 Definitions. (1) Active use(s) means uses that by their very nature generate activity, and thus opportunities for natural surveillance, such as picnic areas, extracurricular school activities, exercise groups, etc. (2) Arcade means a linear pedestrian walkway that abuts and runs along the facade of a building. It is covered, but not enclosed, and open at all times to public use. Typically, it has a line of columns along its open side. There may be habitable space above the arcade. (3) Awning means a roof-like cover that is temporary or portable in nature and that projects from the wall of a building for the purpose of shielding a doorway or window from the elements. (4) Canopy means a permanent, cantilevered extension of a building that typically projects over a pedestrian walkway abutting and running along the facade of a building, with no habitable space above the canopy. A canopy roof is comprised of rigid materials. (5) Common/open space area means area within a development, which is used primarily by the occupants of that development, such as an entryway, lobby, courtyard, outside dining areas, etc. (6) Natural surveillance means easy observation of buildings, spaces, and activities by people passing or living/working/recreating nearby. (7) Parking structure means a building or structure consisting of more than one level, above and/or below ground, and used for temporary storage of motor vehicles. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File//03-100842-00-UP Page 3 (8) Plaza means a pedestrian space that is available for public use and is situated near a main entrance to a building or is clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. Typical features include special paving, landscaping, lighting, seating areas, water features, and art. (9) Public on-site open space means a space that is accessible to the public at all times, predominantly open above, and designed specifically for use by the general public as opposed to serving merely as a setting for the building.. (10) Right-of-way means land owned, dedicated or conveyed to the public, used primarily for the movement of vehicles, wheelchair and pedestrian traffic, and land privately owned, used primarily for the movement of vehicles, wheelchair and pedestrian traffic; so long as such privately owned land has been constructed in compliance with all applicable laws and standards for a Public right-of-way. (11) Sight line means the line of vision from a person to a place or building. (12) Streetscape means a term in urban design that defines and describes the character and quality of a street by the amount and type of features and furnishings abutting it. Such features and furnishings may include trees and other landscaping, benches, lighting, trash receptacles, bollards, curbing, walls, different paving types, signage, kiosks, trellises, art objects, bus stops, and typical utility equipment and appurtenances. (13) Surface parking lot means an off-street, ground level open area, usually improved, for the temporary storage of motor vehicles. (14) Transparent glass means windows that are transparent enough to permit the view of activities within a building from nearby streets, sidewalks and public spaces. Tinting or some coloration is permitted, provided a reasonable level of visibility is achieved. Reflective or very dark tinted glass does not accomplish this objective. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-1634 Site design - Ail zoning districts. (a) General criteria. (1) Natural amenities such as views, significant or unique trees, creeks, riparian corridors, and similar features unique to the site should be incorporated into the design. (2) Pedestrian areas and amenities should be incorporated in the overall site design. Pedestrian areas include but are not limited to outdoor plazas, arcades, courtyards, seating areas, and amphitheaters. Pedestrian amenities include but are not limited to outdoor benches, tables and other furniture, balconies, gazebos, transparent glass at the ground floor, and landscaping. (3) Pedestrian areas should be easily seen, accessible, and located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, open spaces, significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure. (4) Project designers shall strive for overall design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project such as architectural style and features, materials, colors, and textures. (5) Place physical features, activities, and people in visible locations to maximize the ability to be seen, and therefore, discourage crime. For example, place cafes and food kiosks in parks to increase natural surveillance by park users, and place laundry facilities near play equipment in multiple family residential development. Avoid barriers, such as tall or overgrown landscaping or outbuildings, where they make it difficult to observe activity. (6) Provide access control by utilizing physical barriers such as bollards, fences, doorways, etc., or by security hardware such as locks, chains, and alarms. Where appropriate, utilize security guards. All of these methods result in increased effort to commit a crime, and therefore, reduce the potential for it to happen. (7) Design buildings and utilize site design that reflects ownership. For example, fences, paving, art, signs, good maintenance, and landscaping are some physical ways to express ownership. Identifying intruders is much easier in a well-defined space. An area that looks protected gives the impression that greater effort is required to commit a crime. A cared for environment can also reduce fear of crime. Areas that are run down and the subject of graffiti and vandalism are generally more intimidating than areas that do not display such characteristics. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 4 (b) Surface parking lots. (1) Site and landscape design for parking lots are subject to the requirements of Article XVII of this chapter. (2) Vehicle turning movements shall be minimized. Parking aisles without loop access are discouraged. Parking and vehicle circulation areas shall be clearly delineated using directional signage. (3) Driveways shall be located to be visible from the right-of-way but not impede pedestrian circulation on-site or to adjoining properties. Driveways should be shared with adjacent properties to minimize .the number of driveways and curb cuts. (4) Multi-tenant developments with large surface parking lots adjacent to a right-of-way are encouraged to incorporate retail pads against the right-of-way to help break up the large areas of pavement. (5) See FWCC 22-1638 for supplemental guidelines. (c) Parking structures (includes parking floors located within commercial buildings). (1) The bulk (or mass) of a parking structure as seen from the right-of-way should be minimized'by placing its short dimension along the street edge. The parking structure should include active uses such as retail, offices or other commercial uses at the ground level and/or along the street frontage. (2) Parking structures which are part of new development shall be architecturally consistent with exterior architectural elements of the primary structure, including rooflines, facade design, and finish materials. (3) Parking structures should incorporate methods of articulation and accessory elements, pursuant to FWCC 22-1635(c)(2), on facades located above ground level. (4) Buildings built over parking should not appear to "float" over the parking area, but should be linked with ground level uses or screening. Parking at grade under a building is discouraged unless the parking area is completely enclosed within the building or wholly screened with walls and/or landscaped berms. (5) Top deck lighting on multi-level parking structures shall be architecturally integrated with the building, and screened to control impacts to off-site uses. Exposed fluorescent light fixtures are not permitted. (6) Parking structures and vehicle entrances should be designed to minimize views into the garage interior from surrounding streets. Methods to help minimize such views may include, but are not limited to landscaping, planters, and decorative grilles and screens. (7) Security grilles for parking structures shall be architecturally consistent with and integrated with the overall design. Chain-link fencing is not permitted for garage security fencing. (8) See FWCC 22-1638(c)(4) for supplemental guidelines. (d) Pedestrian circulation and public spaces. (1) Primary entrances to buildings should be clearly visible or recognizable from the right-Of-way. Pedestrian pathways from rights-of-way and bus stops to primary entrances, from parking lots to primary · entrances, and pedestrian areas, shall be accessible and should be clearly delineated. (2) Pedestrian pathways and pedestrian areas should be delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in paved texture and color, and protected from abutting vehicle circulation areas with landscaping. Approved methods of delineation include: stone, brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Paint striping on asphalt as a method of delineation is not encouraged. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 5 Fi~'~r¢ { - Scc~ 22. · 1634 l~igur,: 2- See. 22- 1634 (d) (3) Pedestrian connections should be provided between properties to establish pedestrian links to adjacent buildings, parking, pedestrian areas and public rights-of-way. (4) Bicycle racks should be provided for all commercial developments. (5) Outdoor furniture, fixtures, and streetscape elements, such as lighting, freestanding signs, trellises, arbors, raised planters, benches and other forms of seating, trash receptacles, bus stops, phone booths, fencing, etc., should be incorporated into the site design. (6) See FWCC 22-1638 for supplemental guidelines. (e)'Landscaping. Refer to Article XVII of this chapter for specific landscaping requirements and for definitions of landscaping types referenced throughout this article. (f) Commercial service and institutional facilities. Refer to FWCC 22-949 and 22-1564 for requirements related to garbage and recycling receptacles, placement and screening. (1) Commercial services relating to loading, storage, trash and recycling should be located in such a manner as to optimize public circulation and minimize visibility into such facilities. Service yards shall comply with the following: a. Service yards and loading areas shall be designed and located for easy access by service vehicles and tenants and shall not displace required landscaping, impede other site uses, or create a nuisance for adjacent property owners. b. Trash and recycling receptacles shall include covers to prevent odor and wind blown litter. c. Service yard walls, enclosures, and similar accessory site elements shall be consistent with the primary building(s) relative to architecture, materials and colors. d. Chain-link fencing shall not be used where visible from public streets, on-site major drive aisles, adjacent residential uses, or pedestrian areas. Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File//03-100842-00-UP Page 6 (2) Site utilities shall comply with the following: a. Building utility equipment such as electrical panels and junction boxes should be located in an interior utility room. b. Site utilities including transformers, fire standpipes and engineered retention ponds (except biofiltration swales) should not be the dominant element of the front landscape area. When these must be located in a front yard, they shall be either undergrounded or screened by walls and/or Type I landscaping, and shall not obstruct views of tenant common spaces, public open spaces, monument signs, and/or driveways. (g) Miscellaneous site elements. (1) Lighting shall comply with the following: a. Lighting levels shall not spill onto adjacent properties pursuant to FWCC 22-954(c). b. Lighting shall be provided in all loading, storage, and circulation areas, but shall incorporate cut-off shields to prevent off-site glare. c. Light standards shall not reduce the amount of landscaping required for the project by Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping. (2) Drive-through facilities such as banks, cleaners, fast food, drug stores and service stations, etc., shall comply with the following: Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 7 a. Drive-through windows and stacking lanes are not encouraged along facades of buildings that face a right-of-way. If they are permitted in such a location, then they shall be visually screened from such street by Type III landscaping and/or architectural element, or combination thereof, provided such elements reflect the primary building and provide appropriate screening. b. The stacking lane shall be physically separated from the parking lot, sidewalk, and pedestrian areas by Type III landscaping and/or architectural element, or combination thereof, provided such elements reflect the primary building and provide appropriate separation. Painted lanes are not sufficient. c. Drive-through speakers shall not be audible off site. d. A bypass/escape lane is recommended for all drive-through facilities. e. See FWCC 22-1638(d) for supplemental guidelines. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99- 333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-1635 Building design - All zoning districts. (a) General criteria. (1) Emphasize, rather than obscure, natural topography. Buildings should be designed to "step up" or "step down" hillsides to accommodate significant changes in elevation, unless this provision is precluded by other site elements such as stormwater design, optimal traffic circulation; or the proposed function or use of the site. (2) Building siting or massing shall preserve public viewpoints as designated by the Comprehensive Plan or other adopted plans or policies. (3) Materials and design features of fences and walls should reflect that of the primary building(s). (b) Building facade modulation and screening options, defined. All building facades that are both longer than 60 feet and are visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone shall incorporate facade treatment according to this section. Subject facades shall incorporate at least two of the four options described herein; except, however, facades that are solidly screened by Type I landscaping, pursuant to Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping, may Use facade modulation as the sole option under this section. Options used under this section shall be incorporated along the entire length of the facade, in any approved combination. Options used must meet the dimensional standards as specified herein; except, however, if more than two are used, dimensional requirements for each option will be determined on a case-by-case basis; provided, that the gross area of a pedestrian plaza may not be less than the specified minimum of 200 square feet. See FWCC 22-1638(c) for guidelines pertaining to city center core and city center frame. (1) Facade modulation. Minimum depth: two feet; minimum width: six feet; maximum width: 60 feet. Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved facade elements, off-set planes, wing walls and terracing, will be considered; provided, that the intent of this section is met. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03'- 100842-00-UP Page 8 Fi$1m 6 - Sec. 2l. 1635 (2) Landscape screening. Eight-foot-wide Type II landscape screening along the base of the facade, except Type IV may be used in place of Type II for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrance(s). For building facades that are located adjacent to a property line, some or all of the underlying buffer width required by Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping, may be considered in meeting the landscape width reqmrement of this section. Flgllrll: 7- See. ~2. -16g (b) (3) Canopy or arcade. As a modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of-way. Minimum length: 50 percent of the length of the facade using this option. (4) Pedestrian Plaza. Size of plaza: Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building, but it must be a minimum of 200 square feet. The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File//03-100842-00-UP Page 9 F~g'am 9 - Scc. 22 - 1635 (b) (c) Building articulation and scale. (1) Building facades visible from rights-of-way and other public areas should incorporate methods of articulation and accessory elements in the overall architectural design, as described in subsection (c)(2) of this section. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A {>2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 10 (2) Methods to articulate blank walls: Following is a nonexclusive list of methods to articulate blank walls, pursuant to FWCC 22-1564(u) and subsection (c)(1) of this section: a. Showcase, display, recessed windows; b. Window openings with visible trim material or painted detailin~ that resembles trim; b_c. Vertical trellis(es) in front of the wall with climbing vines or similar planting; ed. Set the wall back and provide a landscaped or raised planter bed in front of the wall, with plant material that will obscure or screen the wall's surface; de. Artwork such as mosaics, murals, decorative masonry or metal patterns or grillwork, sculptures, relief, etc., over a substantial portion of the blank wall surface. (The Federal Way arts commission may be Used as an advisory body at the discretion of the planning staff); of. Architectural features such as setbacks, indentations, overhangs, projections, articulated cornices, bays, reveals, canopies, and awnings; fg. Material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, or textural changes; and gh. Landscaped public plaza(s) with space for vendor carts', concerts and other pedestrian activities. (3) See FWCC 22-163 8(c) for supplemental guidelines. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00oUP 'Page 11 22-1636 Building and pedestrian orientation - All zoning districts. (a) Building and pedestrian orientation. (1) Buildings should generally be oriented to rights-of-way, as more particularly described in FWCC 22-163 8. Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows, should be oriented to the right-of-way; otherwise, screening or art features such as trellises, artwork, murals, landscaping, or combinations thereof, should be incorporated into the street-oriented facadex ta ........ ..... + apply +. ............ .... :a~.~ zones). (2) Plazas, public open spaces and entries Should be located at street comers to optimize pedestrian access and use. (3) All buildings adjacent to the street should provide visual access from the street into human services and activities within the building, if applicable. (4) Multiple buildings on the same site should incorporate public spaces (formal or informal). These should be integrated by elements such as plazas, walkways, and landscaping along pedestrian pathways, to provide a clear view to destinations, and to create a unified, campus-like development. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-1637 Mixed-use residential buildings in commercial zoning districts. (a) Ground level facades of mixed-use buildings that front a public right-of-way shall meet the following guidelines: (1) Retail, commercial, or office activities shall occupy at least 20 percent of the gross ground floor, area of the building (unless exempt from this requirement by FWCC district zoning regulations). (2) If parking occupies the ground level, see FWCC 22-1634(c). Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File//03 - 100842-00-UP Page 12 (3) Landscaped gardens, courtyards, or enclosed terraces for private use by residents should be designed with minimum exposure to the right-of-way. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19- 99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-1638 District guidelines. In addition to the foregoing development guidelines, the following supplemental guidelines apply to individual zoning districts: (a) Professional office (PO), neighborhood business (BN), and community business (BC). (1) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. .. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right-of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl-coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For residential uses only: (5) Significant trees shall be retained within a 20'-foot perimeter strip around site. (6) Landscaped yards shall be provided between building(s) and public street(s). Parking lots should be beside or behind buildings that front upon streets. (7) Parking lots should be broken up into rows conta!ning no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas. (8) Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. (9) Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoffshields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums and other comparable large institutional uses. The maximum height for large institutional uses shall be 30 feet and shall include cutoff shields. Figure 16- Sc'c. 22 ~ (10) Principal entries to buildings shall be highlighted with plaza or garden areas containing planting, lighting, seating, trellises and other features. Such areas shall be located and designed so windows overlook them. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 13 (11) Common recreational spaces shall be located and arranged so that windows overlook them. Fi~m~: 18 - ~. 22-. 1638 Ca) (12) Units on the ground floor (when permitted) shall have private outdoor spaces adjacent to them so those exterior portions of the site are controlled by individual households. (13) All new buildings, including accessory buildings, such as carports and garages shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4:12 to a maximum of 12:12. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File//03-100842-00-UP Page 14 (14) Carports and garages in front yards should be discouraged. (15) The longest dimension of any building facade shall not exceed 120 feet. Buildings on the same site may be connected by covered pedestrian walkways. (16) Buildings should be designed to have a distinct "base", "middle" and "top" The base (typically the first floor) should contain the greatest number of architectural elements such as windows, materials, details, overhangs, cornice lines, and masonry belt courses. The midsection by comparison may be simple. (Note: single-story buildings have no middle.) The top should avoid the appearance of a flat roof and include distinctive roof shapes including but not limited to pitched, vaulted or terraced, etc. lrtgt~ 2t- Sec, 22 - 1638 (al (17) Residential design features, including but not limited to entry porches, projecting window bays, balconies or decks, individual windows (rather than strip windows), offsets and cascading or stepped roof forms shall be incorporated into all buildings. Window openings shall have visible trim material or painted detailing that resembles trim. (b) Office park (OP), corporate park (CP), and business park (BP). (1) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). (2) Buildings with ground floor retail sales or services should orient major entrances, display windows and other pedestrian features to the right-of-way to the extent possible. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right-of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl-coated mesh and powder-coated poles. For non-single-family residential uses only: (5) Subsections (a)(5) through (A)(17) of this section shall apply. (c) City center core (CC-C) and city center frame (CC-F). (1) The city center core and frame will contain transitional forms of development with surface parking areas. However, as new development or re-development occurs, the visual dominance of surface parking areas shall be reduced. Therefore, surface parking areas shall be located as follows: a. The parking is located behind the building, with the building located between the right-of-way and the parking areas, or it is located in structured parking; or b. All or some of the parking is located to the side(s) of the building; or c. Some short-term parking may be located between the building(s) and the right-of-way, but this shall not consist of more than one double-loaded drive aisle, and pedestrian circulation shall be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). Large retail complexes may not be able to locate parking according to the above guidelines. Therefore, retail complexes of 60,000 square feet of gross floor area or larger may locate surface parking between the building(s) and the right-of-way. However, this form of development shall provide for small building(s) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A File/103-100842-00-UP ©2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 15 along the right-of-way to break up and reduce the visual impact of the parking, and pedestrian circulation must be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d). For purposes of this guideline, retail complex means the entire lot or parcel, or series of lots or parcels, on which a development, activity or use is located or will locate. (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Building facades that are visible from a right-of-way and subject to modulation per FWCC 22- 1635(b), shall incorporate facade treatment as follows: a. The facade incorporates modulation and/or a landscape screening, pursuant to FWCC 22- 1635(b); and b. The facade incorporates an arcade, canopy or plaza; and/or one or more articulation element listed in FWCC 22-1635(c)(2); provided, that the resulting building characteristics achieve visual interest and appeal at a pedestrian scale and proximity, contribute to a sense of public space, and reinforce the pedestrian experience. (4) Drive-through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located along a facade of a building that faces a right-of-way. (5) Above~grade parking structures with a ground level facade visible from a right-of-way shall incorporate any combination of the following elements at the ground level: a. Retail, commercial, or office uses that occupy at least 50 percent of the building's lineal frontage along the right-of-way; or b. A 15-foot-wide strip of Type II! landscaping along the base of the facade; or c. A decorative grille or screen that conceals interior parking areas from the right-of-way. (6) Facades of parking structures shall be articulated above the ground level pursuant to FWCC 22- 1635(c)(1). (7) When curtain wall glass and steel systems are used to enclose a building, the glazing panels shall be transparent on 50 percent of the ground floor facade fronting a right-of-way or pedestrian area. (8) Chain-link fences shall not be allowed. Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. For non-single-family residential uses only: (9) Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (d) For all residential zones. (1) Non-residential uses, Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(10) and (a)(13) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (2) Non-single-family residential uses. Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(17) of this section shall apply. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-1639 Institutional uses. (a) In all zoning districts where such uses are permitted the following shall apply. (1) Sections 22-1634, 22-1635, and 22-1636. (2) Subsections 1638(a)(1) through (a)(5) and (a)(7) through (a)(9). (3) Building facades that exceed 120 feet in length and are visible from an adjacent residential zone, right-of-way or public park or recreation area shall incorporate a significant structural modulation (offset). The minimum depth of the modulation shall be approximately equal to ten percent of the total length of the subiect facade and the minimum width shall be approximately twice the minimum depth. The modulation shall be integral to the building structure from base to roofline. (4) Roof design shall utilize forms and materials that avoid the general_appearance of a "flat" roof. Rooflines with an integral and obvious architectural pitch are an approved method to meet this guideline. Alternative distinctive roof forms such as varied and multiple stepped rooflines, architectural parapets, articulated cornices and fascias, arches, eyebrows, and Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A File #03-100842-00-UP ©2002 Code Publishing Co. Page 16 similar methods svill be considered by the director provided that the roof design minimizes uninterrupted horizontal planes and results in architectural and visual appeal. (5) Alternative methods to organize and shape the structural elements ora building and provide facade treatment pursuant to Subsection 1635(b) and/or (3), above, will be considered by the director as part of an overall design that addresses the following criteria: a. Faqade design incorporates at least two of the options listed at Subsection 1635(b)i b. The location and dimensions of structural modulations are proportionate to the height and length of the subiect facade, using Subsections 1635(b) and (3) above, as a guideline; c. Facade design incorporates a majori .fy of architectural and accessory, design elements listed at Subsection 22-1635(c)(2) and maximizes building and pedestrian orientation pursuant to Section 22-1636; and d. Overall building design utilizes a combination of structural modulation, facade treatment, and roof elements that organize and vary building bulk and scale, add architectural interest, and appeal at a pedestrian scale, and when viewed from an adjacent residential zone, rights-of-way, or other public area, results in a project that meets the intent of these guidelines. (6) The director may permit or require modifications to the parking area landscaping standards of Subsection 1638(a)(7) for landscape designs that preserve and enhance existing natural features and systems, provided that the total amount of existing and proposed landscaping within parking area(s) meets the applicable square footage requirement of FWCC Article XVII, Landscaping, and the location and arrangement of such landscaping is approved ~y the director. Existing natural features and systems include environmentally sensitive areas, stands of significant trees and native vegetation, natural topography and drainage patterns, wildlife habitat, migration corridors, and connectivity to adjacent habitats. 22-163940 Design criteria for public on-site open space. The following guidelines apply to public on-site open space that is developed pursuant to the height bonus program established in Article XI, Division 8, of this chapter. (1) Open space developed under this section should be located so that it: a. Abuts a public right-of-way, or alternatively, is visible and accessible from a public right-of- way; b. Is bordered on at least one side by, or is readily accessible from, structure(s) with entries to retail or office uses; housing, civic/public uses, or another public open space; and c. Is situated for maximum exposure to sunlight. (2) Open space site design and configuration must meet a majority of the following guidelines: a. The gross area of the open space does not incorporate any other site elements such as setbacks, landscaping, buffers, paving, or storm drainage facilities, that would otherwise be incorporated into site design without exercising the open space option; b. The gross area of the open space encompasses at least 2.5 percent of the lot area, up to a total aggregate square footage of 25,000 square feet; c. The open space area must be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way; d. The primary area is at least 25 feet in width; e. A minimum of 15 percent of the total area of the open space is landscaped using Type IV landscaping or other landscaping alternative; and f. The open space may not be used for parking or loading of commercial vehicles. Commercial vehicle loading areas abutting the open space must be screened by a solid, site-obscuring wall. (Ord. No. 96- 271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A File #03~ 100842-00-UP ©2002 Code Publishing Co. Page i 7 22-1640_1 Design for cluster residential subdivision lots. (a) Garages shall be provided for all residential lots except if the lot is in a multifamily zone. (b) Front entryways should be the prominent feature of the home. AttacBed garages should not compose more than 40 percent of the front facade of the single-family home if the garage doors are flush with the front facade, or will be set back a minimum of five feet from the rest of the front facade. Detached garages should also be set back a minimum of five feet from the facade. (c) If garage access is provided from alleys, the front yard setback can be reduced to 15 feet. (d) Each dwelling unit shall be intended for owner occupancy. (Ord. No. 01-381, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-164~2- 22-1650 Reserved. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File//03-100842-00-UP Page 18 Sec. 22-601. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in the suburban estate (SE) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use... THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS MAXIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS ~ ~ ZONE SE ~ ~ ~ > ~. ~ ~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES USE o o g: Church, Process IV 5 acres 30 ft. !30 ft. 30 ft. 75% 35 ft. A 1. This use must obtain a master plan approved through Process IV. The master plan must showthe ultimate development of the site synagogue See note 1 above transportation including all buildings, parking and ffculation areas, other major improvements and buffers. For nronosals also rmuirin~ a or other average i management develonment a~reement: the city council's public hearing on a development agreement shall takethe ~lace &the punic hearing for >lace of building i plan ClWIP) master nlan apnroval by the hearing examiner. religious elevation, shall be 2. The subject property may contain a rectory or similar dwelling unit fir use by the religious leader &the congregation. If this is a worship submitted as detached dwelling unit, its sabacks are as established for detached dwelling units in thezone. See notes part of the 3. The subject property must be adjacent to a collector or arterial right-of-way. 4, 5, and 6. application. . The TMP shall address the 4~Maximum bei~ht of any vortion of the buildin~ may be increased from 35 feet to 40 feet, if all of the followin~ are met: following: a. The additional hd~ht is necessa~ to accommodate the particular use conducted in the buildin:~; and traffic control, ....b~.Ea~hrequiredYardabuttin~thestmctureisinc~easedoneft'f~reach~nefhthestruetur eexceeds35feet. parking c, An increase in height shall not blo& views desitnated bvthe comprehensive plan. demand and 5,..Maximum height of the sanctuary or pfindpal ~rship area may be increased to 55 feet, if all &the followinl criteria are met" management, a. Each required yard abuttln~ thestructure is increased one fr, for each one t~. the structure exceeds 35 ~. above average building and traffic elevation, movement to b. An increase in heiiht shall not bio& views designated by the comprehensive plan. the adjacent 6. Religious swnbols and i~ons for churches and other religious institutions ~y exceed the highest point of the underlying roof on street system~ which it is mounted by an additional 15 t., provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is ~errnitted on the principal structure for this use & 2. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. ~.. 8~ Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriate requirements. ~. 9. For sign requirements that applyto the project, see Article XVIII. g, 1,~0. For community desiln tuiddines that applyto tbe project, see Article XIX. Process I, 1~ 111 and IV are described in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22411, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. 22431 - 22460 resoecfivelv. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(15.35), 2-27-90; Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh B), 4-20-93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-385, § 3, 4-3-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A File #03-100842-00-UP ~2002 Code Publishine Co. Page 19 Sec. 22-635. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in the single family residential (RS) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: ............. ~' ............ ~ ..................... *' " ' ' 'C ~HART USE ZONE DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use... THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS MAXIMUMS ~ !~ REqUIRED~, YARDS ~ ~u~ ~ i ~ ZONE USE ~ ~ o ~. $~ ~ cy < a, ,~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ mm SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Church, Process As 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 75% 30 ft. A 1. Minimum lot sim per dwelling unit is as flllows: synagogue IV established above transportation a. In RS 35.0 zones, the minimum lot sim is 35,000 sq. 'or other on the See notes 3 - 6 average management b. In RS 15.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 15,000 sq. f. place of See note zoning building ~lan (TMP) c. In RS 9.6 zones, the minimum lot size is 9,600 sq. religious 2 map. elevation, shall be d. In RS 7.2 zones, the minimum lot sim is 7,200 sq. worship See note 1. submitted as e. In RS 5.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 5,000 sq. tL See notes ~art of the 2. If the subject property, along with any contiguous area intended for future use for the religious activities or related purposes, is more than 5 - acres, the use must obtain a froster plan approved through Process IV. The master plan must showthe ultimate development of the site 5 6 7 & application, including all buildings, parking and irculation areas, other major improvements and buffers. For oronosals also rm. uirin_~ a development 8. The TMP a_erecment; the city. council's public hearing on a development agreement shall take the place of the public hearing for master plan approml bv shall address the hearine examiner. traffic control, dv.~!!ing -an!t, '~t: :~back: are a: ~tab!:':~ for d~ae~ ~'.'.e!!!ng '.'.nit: in thezene. parking ~.. T~.e :ubj~t, pre~-'~v' mx:t ~'~ "~:~* °~ ~ ~"~'~ ..... demand and 5. If any portion ora stmctura on the subject property is located less than 100 f. from an adjacent Iow density zone, then either: management, ~.2~..eSeig~teft~atr~xi~neft~:~ar~:~!!n~tm~ed~!5~:~ave~geb~!~ing~--"^~.er~ and traffic b. The facade of that portion ofthe structure parallel to the Iow density zone shall not ~ceed 50 ~. in length. movement to 5. Maximum height ofan¥ portion of the building n~¥ be increased from 30 feet to 40 feet, if all of the following are met: the adjacent a. The additional hdght is necessa~ to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and street system, b. Each required yard abutting thestruaure is increased one fi, for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 feet. c, An increase in height shall not bio& views designat~ by the comprehensive plan, 6, Maximum height oftbe sanctuary or principal worship arm may be increased to 55 feet, if all ofthe following criteria are met: a, Each required yard abutting thestmcture is increased one fi, for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ~. above average building devation. b. An increase in height shall not blod~ view~ deaignat~d by the comprehensive plan. 7, Architectural extensions of flat rooflinea such as parapets and articulated cornices may exceed the 30 ff. base height limit bythree ft. 8, Religious s~mbols and icons for churches and other religious institutions my exceed the highest point of the underlcng roof on which i~ is mounted by an additional 15 f., provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is permitted on the principal structure for this usa 6, 7. Parking may be located within required side and rear yards, but not closer than 15 ~. to any property line. ~ 8~ Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions ofthis chapter may applyto the subject property. 8~ 9, Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriaterequirements. ~ 10~ For sign requirements that applyto the project, see Article XVIII. ~ 11~_~ For communitydesi~n ~uiddines that applyto the project, see Article XIX. Process I, IL 111 and IV are described in §§ 22 2S~C22 ~. ! ! 22-351 - 22-356, For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. 22-361 - 22-370, 22-386 - 22411. For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq 22431 - 22460, respectively. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. (Ord. No. 9043, § 2(20.25), 2-27-90; Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B), 4-20-93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-385, § 3, 4-3-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A File #03-100842-00-UP r/~OOf~9 ("r~A,~ D,,hl;eh;ncr ('"r~ Page 20 Sec. 22-671. Churches, etc. The followin uses shall be vermitted in the multifamil'~ residential (RM) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use... THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS MAXIMUMS m REQUIRED YARDS m z ZONE .~. ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Church, Process IV 7,200 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 75% In RM 3.6 A 1. If the subject property, along with any contiguous area intended for future use for the religious activities or related purposes, synagogue - sq. ft. See notes 2 and 5. and 2.4 transportation more than 5 acres, the use must obtain a master plan approved through Process IV. The master plan must show the ultimate or'other See note I. zones, 30 ft. management development of the site including all buildings, parking and circulation areas, other major improvements and buffers. For place of above plan (TMP) proposals also requiring a development agreement, the city council's public hearing on a development agreement shall take the rcligious average shall be place of the public hearing for master plan approval by the hearing examiner. worship building submitted as 2. The subject property may contain a rectory or similar dwelling unit for use by the religious leader of the congregation. If this is a detached dwelling unit, its setbacks are as established for detached dwetling units in the zone. elevation. ~art of the 3. The subject property must be adjacent to a collector or arterial right-of-way. above shall address b, Th.-_ fxc~_~e cf*Ex: pc~!en cf:he gt.'~a'-~.2re p~mP.e! to ?Se !ow ~_e~sL~, :ene ~h~]! ne*. ~_xc_'e~_ 59 .~., '.'~ !en~ average the following: 4. Maximum height of any portion of the building may be increased from 30 feet in RM 3.6 and RM 2.4 zones and 35 feet~ ih RM building traffic 1.8 zones to 40 feet, if all of the following are met: elevation, control, a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and parking b. Each required yard abutting the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ft. in RM 3.6 and RM See notes 4a demand and 2.4 zones and 35 feet in RM 1.8 zones above average building elevation. 5, 6, and 7 management, c. An increase in height shall not block views designated by the comprehensive !Man. and traffic 5. Maximum height of the sanctuary or principal worship ama may be increased to 55 feet, if all of the following criteria are met: movement to a. Each required yard abutting the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft. the stmctura exceeds 35 ft. above average the adjacent buildin~ elevation. b. An increase in height shall not block view~ designated by the comprehensive plan. street system. 6. Architectural extensions of flat roofllnes such as parapets and articulated cornices may exceed the 30 ft. base height limit by three ft. 7. Religious symbols and icons for churches and other religious institutions may exceed the highest point of the underlying roof on which it is mounted by an additional 15 ft., provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is permitted on the principal structure for this use. ~ 8_. Parking may be located within required side and rear yards, but not closer than 15 fL to any property line. 6, 9~ Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. ~. 10~ Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriate requirements. 8,. 11_=. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. ~. 12__~. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX. Process I, II, III and IV are described in I For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. ~ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22-370, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. 22-386 - 22411, For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. 22-4~ 1 - 22460 respectively. (Ord. No. 9043, § 2(25.35), 2-27-90; Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B), 4-20,93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-385, § 3, 4-3-01; Ord. No. 02426, § 3, 10-15-02) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-I00842-00-UP Page 21 22-755 Schools - Day care facilities - Churches. The following uses shall be permitted in the community business (BC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use... THEN, across for REGULATIONS ~ Minimums ~ ~ Required Yards ~ ZONE ~ ~ ~ ~ .o =o~, BC USE e~ ~ ~ ~,'~ ~ ~ ::i:: ~ ~ ~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES Schools, Process II None 20 ft. 0 ft. 0 ft. 55 ft. above Schools and day 1. If any portion of a structure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacent residential zone, then that portion of business or See notes 1 and 11 average care: the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above average building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of 20 ft. from the vocational Possible building Determined on a propert3, line of the residential zone. schools, or Process elevation for ease-by-ease 2. Except for gyms, if approved through process III, the height of a structure may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a trade schools III gyms if basis maximum of 55 ft., if all of the following efite[ia are met: located 100 a. The additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and, b. Each required yard abutting the structure is increased five ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. above average building Day care See note ft. or more A transportation elevation; and facilities, 2 from an management e. The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject properly as established by the comprehensive except Class adjacent plan (TMP) plan. .II home residential shall be 3. For any structure, including gyms, an increase in height above 35 ft. shall not block views designated by the comprehensive plan. occupations zone submitted as 4.~ Religious symbols and icons for churches and other religious institutions may exceed the highest point of the underlying roof on )art of the which it is mounted by an additional 15 ft., provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is Church, 35 ft. above application. The )ermitted on the principal structure for this use. synagogue average TMP shall 4. 5_. Church facilities may contain a rectory or similar dwelling unit for use by the religious leader of the congregation. or other building address the 6, 6_. Day care facilities must contain an outdoor play area with at least 75 sq. ft. for each child using the area at any one time. This play place of elevation for following: area must be completely enclosed by a solid fence or other screen at least six ft. in height. Play equipment and structured play areas must religious all other traffic control, be set back at least five ft. from each properly line. worship structures parking demand 6, 7: Day care facilities may include accessory living facilities as defined by § 22-1. and ~ 8. Day care facilities and schools must comply with the requirements of the State Department of Social and Health Services and/or the See notes 1 management, State Superintendent of Public Instruction. - 3 4 and traffic 8, 9_. All activities pertaining to schools, business or vocational schools, or trade schools, such as auto-repair or other uses that may movement to the unpact adjacent properties, must take place within an enclosed building. adjacent street ~ 10~ No maximum lot coverage.is established. Instead, the buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, system. ~.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. 4~. 11__:. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article )fiX. ~. 12___:. For landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. ~. 13.__:. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. ~. 14__.~. Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to determine what 6ther provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject properly. lA, 15. Schools may locate containers on-site for the storage of emergency preparedness supplies as an accessory use. Containers may ~not be located in any required yard. Landscaping may be required by the director of community development services to screen the installation if the proposed location will be visible from a public right-of-way and/or neighboring properties. Siting is subject to review and approval under process I, Site Plan Review, unless proposed as a component of another project; in which case the siting of the container will be reviewed as part of the overall development proposal and subject to the underlying review process. / [ . For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. Process I, n, ll][ and IV are described in ~ §§ 22-351 -- 22-356, 22-361 -- 22-370 22-386 -- 22-411, For details of what may exceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. 22431 -- 22460, respectively. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. (Ord. No. 9043 § 2(45.65), 2-27-90; Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B), 4-20-93; Ord. No. 94-270, § 5, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 01-385, § 3, 4-3-01; Ord. No. 01-399 § 3, 8-7-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ©2002 Code Publishing Co. File # 03-100842-00-UP Page 22 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C