The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 05-06-2003 Regular City of Federal Way City Council Meeting AGENDA CO UN CILMEMBERS Jeanne Burbidge, Mayor Jack Dovey Eric Faison Mary Gates Linda Kochmar Dean McColgan Mike Park CITY MANAGER David H. Moseley Office of the City Clerk May 6, 2003 1. II. III. IV. v. AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Regular Meeting May 6, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. (wwwcityoffedemlway.corn) * * '" * * CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATIONS a. b. c. SPIRIT Award/Month of May Swearing-In Ceremony/Police Officers Independent Salary Commission Introductions/Certificates Arts Commission Honorable Mention A wards/Jr-Sr High Art Show Proclamation/"Mental Health Month" Introduction of New Employees/City Manager Emerging Issues/City Manager d. e. f. g. CITIZEN COMMENT PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SLIP & PRESENT TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor. please come Jorward to the podium and state your name Jor the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE (3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that continue too long. relate negatively to other individuals. or are otherwise inappropriate. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee oj three members and brought before Jull Council Jar approval; all items are enacted by one motion. Individual items may be removed by a Councilmember Jar separate discussion and subsequent motion. a. b. Minutes/April 15, 2003 Regular Meeting Vouchers Quarterly Financial Report/March 2003 Banking Services Contract c. d. Over please. . . e. f. g. h. 1. j. k. I. m. n. o. p. q. VI. a. b. VII. VIII. Ix. X. a. b. XI. 2003 Interlo¿~l Agree¡¡j~ht lorwat6rfowl Management Program King County Developmental Disabilities Grant Amendment to Extend Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) Contract Amendment to Extend Myers Master Lawn Care Contract Dumas Bay Centre/Roof Maintenance System Final Acceptance & Release of Retainage Red, White & Blues Festival Fireworks/Request for Proposal (RFP) Parks Commission 2003-2004 Work Plan Human Services Commission 2003 Work Plan Purchase of Storage Trailer Valley Special Response Team Support of Special Olympics/Resolution Steel Lake Management District Petition/Resolution Tourism Enhancement Grant A':Yards CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Selection of Voting Delegates for A WC Annual Business Meeting Parks & Recreation Commission Appointments INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE Council Bill #322/Amendments to Zoning Code/Design Guidelines/Height AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CHAPTER 22 (ZONING), ARTICLE XIX OF THE CITY CODE-DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEFINITION OF HEIGHT. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b) ADJOURNMENT ** THE COUNClL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTlON ON OTHER ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA .* THE COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT CITY HALL AND ALSO ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE UNDER "NEW-FEDERAL WAY DOCUMENT LIBRARY" MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# .x-C tt ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the City Council regular meeting held on April 15,2003. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Official City Council meeting minutes for permanent records pursuant to RCW requirements. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: nla PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the draft meeting minutes of the City Council regular meeting held April 15,2003, as presented." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # I ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers - City Hall Regular Meeting April 15, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. OR~f1 Minutes I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Burbidge called the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council to order at the hourof7:00p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jeanne Burbidge, Deputy Mayor Dean McColgan, Councilmembers Jack Dovey, Eric Faison, Mary Gates, Linda Kochmar, and Mike Park. Staff present: City Manager David Moseley, City Attorney Pat Richardson, and City Clerk Chris Green. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Counci1member Park led the flag salute. DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN MOVED TO AMEND TONIGHT'S AGENDA TO ADD "YOUTH RECOGNITION WEEK PROCLAMATION" TO TONIGHT'S AGENDA; COUNCILMEMBER GATES SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes III. PRESENTATIONS a. Proclamation/Sister City Hachinohe Incorporation Anniversary Mayor Burbidge read and presented the Sister City of Hac hi no he Incorporation Anniversary proclamation to Assistant City Manager Derek Matheson. Mr. Matheson accepted and thanked the Council for this proclamation. He encouraged citizens to attend the monthly meetings and upcoming events the Sister City Association is working on. Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April 15, 2003 - Page 2 of 6 b. Proclamation/Youth Recognition Week (ADDED ITEM) Mayor Burbidge was pleased to read and present Lindsey Newport and various members of the Youth Commission with the Youth Recognition Week proclamation. Ms. Newport thanked Council for the proclamation and invited everyone to attend the Youth Recognition Dinner on Wednesday, April 16th at Dumas Bay Centre. c. Introduction of New Employees/City Manager City Manger David Moseley was happy to announce and introduce Aaron Nix, the city's new Surface Water Maintenance Inspector for the Public Works Department; Mayor Burbidge welcomed Mr. Nix. d. Emerging Issues/City Manager City Manager David Moseley announced there were no emerging issues to discuss tonight. IV. CITIZEN COMMENT There was no citizen COmment this evening. V. CONSENT AGENDA a. b. Minutes/April 1, 2003 Regular Meeting -Approved Bellacarino Woods Sewer Extension Project/lOO% Design Approval & Authorization to Execute Developer Extension Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District & Authorization to Bid -Approved West Hylebos Creek Restoration/gO% Design Status Report-Approved Lakota Creek Restoration/60% Design Status Report-Approved Steel Lake Soccer Field Project Agreement-Approved c. d. e. DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY SECOND. Counci1member Kochmar pulled items (b)/Bellacarino Woods Sewer Extension Project/1 00% Design Approval & Authorization to Execute Developer Extension Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District & Authorization to Bid and item (e)/Steel Lake Soccer Field Project Agreement. The motion to approve items (a), (c), and (d) passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey yes yes Kochmar McColgan yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April 15, 2003 -Page 3 0[6 Faison Gates yes yes Park yes Item (b)/ Bellacarino Woods Sewer Extension Project/WO% Design Approval & Authorization to Execute Developer Extension Agreement with Lakehaven Utility District & Authorization to Bid: Councilmember Kochmar noted she would be recusing herself from voting on this item, as she is employed with Lakehaven Utility District. COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEM (b)/BELLACARINO WOODS SEWER EXTENSION PROJECT/IOO% DESIGN APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE DEVELOPER EXTENSION AGREEMENT WITH LAKEHA VEN UTILITY DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZATION TO BID; DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN SECOND. The motion passed 6-0 as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kachmar McColgan Park recused yes yes Item (e)/Steel Lake Soccer Field Project Agreement: Counci1member Kochmar asked City Manager Moseley for a brief staff report on this item. Mr. Moseley reported the city has secured grant funding for the new all surface field for Steel Lake. The grant covers $400,000 of the $800,000 total needed to complete the project. He noted this is a welcomed improvement for those citizens who use the field, and have dealt with the problem of dust in the summer and mud in the winter. COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM (e)/STEEL LAKE SOCCER FIELD PROJECT AGREEMENT; DEPUTY MAYOR MCCOLGAN SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April/5, 2003 - Page 4 0/6 VI. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Independent Salary Commission Appointments COUNCILMEMBER DOVEY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE INDEPENDENT SALARY COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS AS PRESENTED; COUNCILMEMBER KOCHMAR SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey Faison Gates yes yes yes yes Kochmar McColgan Park yes yes yes VII. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Gates gave a brief update to Council on the various regional meetings she has attended, and also updated Council on numerous Sound Transit issues. Counci1member Kochmar gave a brief update to Council on the various regional meetings and community events she has attended. She recognized and welcomed the Boy Scouts who were visiting tonight's meeting. Counci1member Park announced the next meeting of the Finance/Economic Development/Regional Affairs Committee would be held April 22nd at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall. Counci1member Faison announced the next meeting of the Land Use/Transportation Committee would be held April 21st at 5:30 p.m. at City Hall. Deputy Mayor McColgan announced the next meeting ofthe Lodging Tax Advisory Committee would be held Apri118th at 8:00 a.m. at City Hall. Mayor Burbidge gave a brief update to Council on her attendance at various regional meetings; she announced and encouraged citizens to attend various community events in the performing arts. VII1. CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager David Moseley reported the two major facility projects are off to a good and aggressive start. While in the due diligence stage, staff continue working on drafting a purchase and sale agreement for the Paragon building for a combined municipal facility. He noted they are also working on conducting a "fatal flaw" analysis on the building. The Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April 15, 2003 - Page 5 of 6 Community Center's architectural consultants will be in town in late April. The first community meeting on the community/senior/swim center will be held April 29th at Saghalie Junior High School. Mr. Moseley announced Earth Day is April 22nd and Arbor Day is April 25th He noted the Parks, Community Development, and Public Works Departments have planned activities throughout the month. For more information, review the city's spring newsletter or contact the volunteer coordinator. He was also pleased to comment on the article written up in a national magazine on the city's Police Department. He noted this was another example of the national recognition the police department is receiving. He congratulated Chief Kirkpatrick and her staff on their success in the short seven-year history of the department. City Manager David Moseley further reminded Council of the need for an Executive Session for the purpose of discussing Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RVW 42.30.110(1 )(i) and Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b); for approximately one hour with action expected. Ix. EXECUTIVE SESSION a. b. Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b) At 7:30 p.m. Mayor Burbidge announced the Council would be recessing into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing Potential Litigation/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i), and Property Acquisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1 )(b); for approximately one hour with action anticipated. At 8:30 p.m. Assistant City Manager Derek Matheson announced the Council would be extending executive session for an additional fifteen minutes. At 8:45 p.m. Council returned to Chambers. COUNCILMEMBER FAISON MOVED TO DIRECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO DIRECT CITY STAFF TO SETTLE THAT PORTION OF THE CONDEMNATIONLA WSUIT THAT PERTAINS TO DEFENDANT, SHDP ASSOCIATES, PARCEL 67, THROUGH THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT-OF- WAY FOR $98,500; COUNCILMEMBER PARK SECOND. The motion passed as follows: Burbidge Dovey yes yes Kochmar McColgan yes yes Federal Way City Council Regular Meeting Minutes April15, 2003 - Page 6 0/6 Faison Gates yes yes Park yes x. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Federal Way City Council, Mayor Burbidge adjourned the regular meeting at 8:45 p.m. Stephanie Courtney Deputy City Clerk MEETING DATE: MAy!P ~, 2003 ITEM# -=rz.- 4- \ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: VOUCHERS CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: i:8J CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $1,611,766.34 $1,611,766.34 $ ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor perf Of ed s des' d herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Way, Washin am authorized to authenticate and certify said claims. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached vouchers pursuant to RCW 42.24 PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of Vouchers. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 fZ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 2003 Federal Way City Council / Tho Kraus;::r;:~anag~ David Mos?-vT\1 \anager Follow-up to Voucher Questions TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: The following is a response to the voucher question raised at the Finance, Economic Development and Regional Affairs Committee meeting: . Check#172074-GiggleWorks $500.00 This payment is for a juggler and balloon artist at the 4/9/03 Safety Station Express event sponsored by the Public Safety Department and St. Joseph's Bum Unit. This was a community event that teaches preschool children basic safety rules, with many organizations such as the local fire department and American Red Cross participating. Funding for the City's participation at this event is through donations received from Wa1Mart and St. Joseph's Bum Unit. If you have any additional questions regarding vouchers, please do not hesitate to ask. C: City Manager Department Directors ~ CITY OF ~..;, Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: April 17,2003 To: Finance. Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee From: Via: Tho Kraus, Finance Manager David Moseley, City Manager Subject: Vouchers Action ReQuested: Accept the vouchers and forward to the Next Council meeting for approval. ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION: ~ Committee Member k:\finlacctspay\checkrun\mfr cover.doc ¡::;- apChklst 03/21/2003 10:06:37AM FinalCheck List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17196503/17/2003002024 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES 3/17103 Voucher: 171965 17196603/17/2003002024 PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES FEB/MAR 03 Voucher: 171966 17196703/17/2003003464 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR C0172104 9065 Voucher: 171967 17196803/21/2003001790 BARGREEN ELLINGSON INC 4014487 Voucher: 171968 17196903/21/2003006968 CITY OF DUVALL 2003 DUE -,.>.. Voucher: 171969 J..i 17197003/21/2003005208 COMMERCIAL CARD SERVI FEB 2003 Voucher: 171970 171971 03/21/2003000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC 00165043 Voucher: 171971 17197203/21/2003000438 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J 9596 Voucher: 171972 17197303/21/2003007133 ECO-PAN LLC 2003-; Voucher: 171973 17197403/21/2003006250 EFFECTIVE PROMOTIONS 93191 Voucher: 171974 17197503/21/2003001299 FORD GRAPHICS 25105 Voucher: 171975 17197603/21/2003007241 JACO ENVIRONMENTAL INC 1769 Voucher: 171976 171977 03/21/2003 000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI 0066231-0150 Voucher: 171977 17197803/21/2003004837 PACIFIC UTILITY EQUIPMENT649087 01 Voucher: 171978 64908702 17197903/21/2003002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M016192 Voucher: 171979 17198003/21/2003007297 ROBERTS, BRIAN Voucher: 171980 171981 03/21/2003003873 SIGN-A-RAMA Voucher: 171981 2003 DUES 2003-258 2510596 EMP REIM 6580 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/17/2003 MSF-REIM WITNESS FUND P 405.16 405.16 03/17/2003 MSF-REIM WITNESS FUND P 473.50 473.50 03/17/2003 PWCIP- 02-2-19486-9 KNT/#1 50,910.00 50,910.00 02/17/2003 PWSWR-RECYCLING CONT 548.35 548.35 03/19/2003 MSC-2003 DUE/C GREEN & S 40.00 40.00 02/28/2003 MSF-CITY VISA CHARGES F 5,481.79 5,481.79 02/21/2003 PWS-ECOLOGY BLOCKS; C 65.28 65.28 02/25/2003 PWSCIP-LUNCH MEETING S 48.23 48.23 02/14/2003 SWMM-CONCRETE REClA 163.20 163.20 03/04/2003 PWSWR-RECYCLING BROC 331.55 331.55 02/17/2003 PWS-PRINTING OF RFB FOR 160.81 160.81 03/10/2003 PWS-APPLIANCE PICKUP; I 45.00 45.00 03/19/2003 SWM-APPLFEE-DEVELOPE 500.00 500.00 02/21/2003 PWS-EQUIPMENT RENTAL- 522.24 02/24/2003 PWS-EQUIPMENT RENTAl- 174.08 696.32 03/19/2003 PKM-MILEAGE/LLEWIS 85.19 85.19 03/10/2003 PW-WORK BOOTS REIMBU 63.08 63.08 02/21/2003 PWSWR-SIGNS FOR RECY 49.16 49.16 Page: 1 apChkLst 03/21/2003 10:06:37AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriPtion Amount Paid Check Total 02/11/2003 AG02-133B:RPLCMNT OF MT 16,528.88 16,528.88 03/05/2003 CITY VISA CHARGES FOR (F 3,146.00 3,146.00 03/05/2003 PS-CITY VISA CHARGES FO 2,425.41 2,425.41 02/28/2003 SWMM-HOTMIX SWMM RE 89.66 02/28/2003 SWMM-HOTMIX SWMM RE 45.20 134.86 Sub total for us bank: 82,301.77 17198203/21/2003003014 TRANSTECH ELECTRIC INC 001919 Voucher: 171982 17198303/21/2003005253 US BANCORP Voucher: 171983 17198403/21/2003005254 US BANCORP Voucher: 171984 17198503/21/2003000660 WOODWORTH & COMPANY 1153344 Voucher: 171985 153343 FEB 2003 FEB 2003 1 Page: 2 M ;,; '" '" n. >- ~ ø..J :Jë:i ""w " c .. W t3u. -u. :!O ü:~ i3 :¡¡; <C "'" M cD 0 ë .... M - 0 "'0 ..IN ""- .r:..... U!:! Q.M "'0 '" OJ '" III a. ~ " .. .r:. U C( ¡¡¡ Õ I- ... c: '" is .¿ 0 Q. e "' ~ .5 "' "" " .. .r:. " N f-S 'ot ëö en co 0.. >- ~ Ui...l :::¡~ "':w u C CD W c3u. -u. :g 0 ü:~ Õ M - 0 jo ...:!::! .c.... O!::! CLM CO 0 :æ « ... M CÖ 0 Ö .... > Q) -'" ëö 'C 0 u - -'" Q) :; Õ III .5. ~ apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor 17198603/21/2003001129 J & K FOUNDATIONS INC Voucher: 171986 17198703/28/2003001004 MAILMEDIA INC Voucher: 171987 17198803/31/2003000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 812651 Voucher: 171988 17198903/31/2003000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13198 Voucher: 171989 17199003/31/2003007309 AHSOAK-STEVENS. TONYA L 03-41537 Voucher: 171990 171991 03/31/2003006121 AIRTIME AVIATION 02-40402 Voucher: 171991 17199203/31/2003000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 268366 ~ Voucher: 171992 268467 -J 17199303/31/2003001285 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-54726 Voucher: 171993 17199403/31/2003 005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6417 Voucher: 171994 17199503/31/2003005501 ANDREWS. AMY CA26282 Voucher: 171995 CA25990 17199603/31/2003005715 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS IM6163838C Voucher: 171996 17199703/31/2003 007158 ARCHIVES NORTHWEST LLC 0040 Voucher: 171997 17199803/31/2003005822 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENS F03-062471 Voucher: 171998 17199903/31/2003 003057 ASSOC OF PERMIT TECHNIC APT 2003 Voucher: 171999 17200003/31/2003 001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE Voucher: 172000 Invoice STL LK PK 39711 02-40402 051066149401 AT&T-CELL SV 050491611501 051071461201 050532095501 051067844101 Inv Date Description 12/20/2002 PKM-FORM,PLACE, GUTTER 03/04/2003 PRCS-ARTS COMM NEWSLE 03/13/2003 MSC -LEGAL MESSENGER S 03/12/2003 PKM-FACILITY LOCKSMITH S 03/07/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 03/06/2003 PW-REFUND 100% BOND R 02/20/2003 PKRCS-ALRM MNTR SVC 3/ 02/20/2003 PKCHB-ALRM MNTR SVC 3/ 03/04/2003 PWST- HOYT ROAD 03/01/2003 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 03/04/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2628 02/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2599 03/22/2003 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE 313/ 02/27/2003 MC- STORGAGE FEES 1/1/0 02/26/2003 PS-NIK TEST E,G. K BOX OF . 03/13/2003 CDL - APT 2003 MEMB DUES 02/28/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 03/27/2003 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 3/9/03 , 03/10/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 02/24/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 02/25/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 02/28/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV Amount Paid 3,546.88 1,034.74 5.00 61.24 100.00 778.00 59.74 103.00 196.93 54.00 70.00 130.00 1,089.41 291.23 364.26 25.00 23.97 23.97 18.54 26.71 21.27 21.27 Check Total 3,546.88 1,034.74 5.00 61.24 100.00 778.00 162.74 196.93 54.00 200.00 1,089.41 291.23 364.26 25.00 135.73 Page: 1 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 172001 03/31/2003000075 AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES I 25028069 Voucher: 172001 49095524 20405718 17200203/31/2003000575 ATTORNEYS INFORMATION E51687 Voucher: 172002 17200303/31/2003 001604 BALL, GIG I Y CA24926 Voucher: 172003 17200403/31/2003002386 BANHEGYI/ PAWLAK, SUSANCA22355 Voucher: 172004 CA28161 17200503/31/2003005421 BARGER, KENNETH CA26405 Voucher: 172005 CA28281 CA24222 PS-BENSEN CA24926 17200603/31/2003 007247 BENSEN, MARK Voucher: 172006 -n 172007'03/31/2003007282 BERK & ASSOCIATES INC ~ Voucher: 172007 17200803/31/2003005098 BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO ~258367 Voucher: 172008 17200903/31/2003007310 BLOUNT. CURTIS Voucher: 172009 1760-1 03-41625 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/12/2003 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 3/12 5.70 03/02/2003 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME FEB 2 3.46 03/02/2003 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME FEB 2 731.06 740.22 02/28/2003 LAW - FEBRUARY, 2003 DUE 26.71 26.71 02/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2492 61.25 61.25 03/10/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2235 210.00 02/24/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2816 78.00 288.00 02/18/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2640 45.00 02/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2828 45.00 02/21/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2422 45.00 135.00 03/12/2003 PS-INVEST DET CLOTHING A 275.00 275.00 02/26/2003 AG03-8A:FACILITATOR FOR ( 4,800.00 4,800.00 03/11/2003 PS-REPAIRS#618 16.85 16.85 03/07/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 75.00 '<:; Page: 2 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check list CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 'l") ---.¡j Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17201103/31/2003001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 1287249 Voucher: 172011 284683 287489 287494 282900 287551 289436 287794-01 280491 287496-01 287490 287907 289971 276602-01 288371 288373 288374 288859-01 288863-01 288895-01 288375 285849 286267 288613 282436-81 287868 289710 288230 280491-80 288234 290221 290355 273493 274358 274373 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 251.16 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 231.58 02126/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 184.85 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 154.39 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 147.91 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 134.48 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 117.45 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 102.76 01/23/2003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 100.00 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 98.14 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 91.88 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 91.88 03/04/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 91.28 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 80.02 02/25/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 40.15 02/25/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 40.15 02/25/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 40.15 03/10/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 40.15 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 40.15 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 40.15 02/25/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 31.44 02/25/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 21.17 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 20.67 02/27/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 1,152.19 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 19.58 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 982.95 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 16.32 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 10.83 01/31/2003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 10.76 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 7.18 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 4.90 03/11/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 4.90 02/19/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 761.93 02/19/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 761.93 02/19/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 761.93 Page: 3 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 287496 288103 285839 288444 290071 287465 100949 S 100975 S 098227 17201203/31/2003005032 BOBCAT NORTHWEST Voucher: 172012 17201303/31/2003000007 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS Voucher: 172013 172014 03/31/2003 005640 BOTACH TACTICAL Voucher: 172014 \\ 172015 03/31/2003 004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP 005144 ~ Voucher: 172015 005259 0 17201603/31/2003000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 6578 Voucher: 172016 6640 6629 6579 6635 6628 6632 6637 6639 241501 55533 17201703/31/2003001348 CANOPY WORLD INC Voucher: 172017 17201803/31/2003 702491 CAREAGE DEVELOPMENT 02-38381 Voucher: 172018 17201903/31/2003000991 CASCADE COFFEE INC Voucher: 172019 17202003/31/2003003093 CASCADE COMPUTER MAIN Voucher: 172020 172021 03/31/2003 001481 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3378539 Voucher: 172021 20322610 30309967 9066184 Inv Date Description 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCEs. 02/12/2003 PS-UNIFORM CLOTHING 02/26/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 02/25/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES. 02/05/2003 PKM-BUCKET WfTEETH PAR 02/06/2003 PKM-UPGRADE THROUGH B 02/27/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/12/2003 PS-POLICE EQUIPMENT EYE 02/12/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/07/2003 MSFL T-REPAIRIMAINT SVCS 02/03/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 03/07/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 03/13/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 02/24/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 03/18/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 03/13/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 03/18/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 03/18/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 03/18/2003 DBC - CATERING SVCS 02/13/2003 MSFLT-AUTO REPAIRS 03/11/2003 PW-REFUND 100% BOND R 03/24/2003 MSM&D-MTG COFFEE SUPP 01/15/2003 PKRLS-MTG COFFEE SUPPL 03/11/2003 MSDP-PRINTER MAINT 02/19/2003 AG02-8: PAC HWY HOV PHA Amount Paid 718.79 652,80 638.28 358.88 355.78 352.35 1,895.33 1,892.73 30.48 54.00 578.34 97.23 102.90 803.25 81.60 2,001.19 79.82 45.04 39.84 111.22 152.28 1.565.63 5,825.00 89.90 72.00 625.60 38,938.33 Check Total 9,764.24 3,788.06 30.48 54.00 675.57 3,417.14 1,565.63 5,825.00 161.90 625.60 38,938.33 Page: 4 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: key us bank (Continued) CA25389 CA26185 CA28130 17202303/31/2003005622 CHELAN COUNTY TREASUREOO0941 Voucher: 172023 17202403/31/2003005657 CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECO ABOOO0651437 Voucher: 172024 17202503/31/2003000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2014 Voucher: 172025 CK# 2011 CK# 2008 CK# 2015 CK# 2006 CK# 2009 CK# 2016 0000587 lJ 17202603/31/2003005817 CITY OF FIFE Voucher: 172026 17202703/31/2003003551 CITY OF KENT Voucher: 172027 17202803/31/2003003153 CITY OF MILTON Voucher: 172028 17202903/31/2003004412 CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS W02-03 Voucher: 172029 17203003/31/2003 005507 CLIFTON, THOMAS E Voucher: 172030 17203103/31/2003003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA Voucher: 172031 Check # Date Vendor 17202203/31/2003005712 CHANG. JENNY Voucher: 172022 Invoice 24349 CD APPEALS FEB-MAR/03 T1172822-1 T1181017 T1182926 T1183857 T1181017-1 33609261 17203203/31/2003 005300 COMPAQ CORPORATION Voucher: 172032 17203303/31/2003007296 COMPRESOURCElFIDELITY F337450 Voucher: 172033 Inv Date Description 03/03/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2538 03/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2618 03/03/2003 MC-INTE.RPRETER:CA#2813 03/05/2003 PS-JAIL SERVICES (FEB/03) 02/28/2003 PS-AUTOTRACKXP - FEB 20 03/27/2003 PS-TRAVEL EXP:BACKGROU 03/24/2003 PW-TRAVEL EXP:RESTORAT 03/13/2003 PS-TRAVEL EXP:SERGEANT' 03/31/2003 MSHR-TRAVEL EXP:AWC WE 03/04/2003 PKRCS-TRAVEL EXP:NTNL A 03/20/2003 PS-TRAVEL EXP:SFST & DRU 03/31/2003 MSHR-TRAVEL EXP:AWC WE 03/07/2003 PS-JAIL SERVICES (FEB/03) 03/04/2003 PS-VINYL COVER:SRT VEHIC 03/24/2003 CDPL - SEPA APPEAL FEE 01/31/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS 1/1 - 1 03/06/2003 PKRCS-DANCE CLASSES 2/ 02/25/2003 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 02/28/2003 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 03/05/2003 PKM-GRD MNT JANITORIAL ~ 03/07/2003 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 03/03/2003 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 03/13/2003 MSDP - HP SDLT BACKUP T 01/31/2003 PS-5 OZ. PEPPER SPRAY:PA" Amount Paid 70.00 35.00 52.50 13,008.00 60.00 93.00 75.00 198.40 49.00 175.00 156.00 147.56 17,640.00 36.27 500.00 2,778.38 504.00 397.23 129.33 398.84 130.51 14.79 1,157.63 324.57 Check Total 157.50 13,008.00 60.00 893.96 17,640.00 36.27 500.00 2,778.38 504.00 1,070.70 1,157.63 324.57 Page: 5 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17203403/31/2003004395 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICA 0220-419349 Voucher: 172034 0220-419194 0220-419111 0220-419329 0220-419192 17203503/31/2003000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC 0018723 Voucher: 172035 0018112 ì\ ~ Inv Date Description 03/04/2003 PKCHB/LiGHT BULBS;- 02/28/2003 PKCHB/FLOURESCENT BUL 03/04/2003 PKDBC-THEATRE LIGHTING: 03/04/2003 PKCHB/LiGHT BULBS;- 03/11/2003 PKMCHB-LlGHTING SUPPLI 03/18/2003 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK 03/12/2003 PKM-QUARRY ROCK Amount Paid 20.89 129.91 259.81 129.91 129.91 157.43 98.74 Check Total 670.43 256.17 Page: 6 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) ì\ '-"~ Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17203603/31/2003000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF 41709630 Voucher: 172036 41517370 41517400 41364663 40741326 40546223 40741325 4170936 41709635 41364666 41709631 41709632 41517369 40970573 41481729 41364665 40610759 41364667 41223682 41709633 40923737 41040932 40884370 41709628 40741346 40779900CR 41709629 41364664 41554434 41326386 40704115 40666468 41326365 41290978 41709634 Inv Date Description 03/20/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 03/13/2003 MSHR -OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/13/2003 CD-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/07/2003 MSHR -OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/14/2003 MSC-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQU 02/07/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/14/2003 MC-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 03/20/2003 PS-PAPER SUPPLY 03/20/2003 PS-PAPER SUPPLY 03/07/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 03/20/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 03/20/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 03/13/2003 CD-OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/24/2003 PK-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUI 03/12/2003 CD-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/07/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 02/11/2003 CD-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/07/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 03/03/2003 CD-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/20/2003 PS-PAPER SUPPLY 02/21/2003 MSC-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQU 02/26/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/20/2003 MC-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 03/20/2003 MSHR -OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/14/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/17/2003 MSC-OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQU 03/20/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 03/07/2003 CH-PAPER SUPPLY 03/14/2003 MSF-OFFICE SUPPLlES- 03/06/2003 CD-OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/13/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/12/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/06/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/27/2003 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 03/20/2003 PS-PAPER SUPPLY Amount Paid 76.70 76.40 74.37 67.51 65.33 65.02 57.96 51.14 51.14 51.14 51.14 51.14 42.47 36.26 33.25 76.70 26.98 76.70 25.80 25.57 23.13 12.28 9.35 7.06 5.83 -17.47 76.70 76.70 78.48 81.44 91.33 121.24 134.98 167.47 178.98 Check Total 2,130.22 Page: 7 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17203703/31/2003003536 CREATIVE OFFICE FURNISH 03-59911 Voucher: 172037 172038 03/31/2003 000939 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C166842 Voucher: 172038 166841 207902 166792 166790 166843 17203903/31/2003006056 CUFLEY. CHRISTY GERHART 1/27103 Voucher: 172039 17204003/31/2003004530 CWACONSULTANTS 03-133 Voucher: 172040 -H 172041 03/31/2003000854 D J TROPHY 00210453 \ \ Voucher: 172041 00210400 ....c 00210266 17204203/31/2003000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMER3138214 Voucher: 172042 17204303/31/2003007242 DASHER TECHNOLOGIES 30908 Voucher: 172043 17204403/31/2003005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA CA27530 Voucher: 172044 CA24499 CA26282 CA16473 17204503/31/2003007277 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 33994 Voucher: 172045 34065 17204603/31/2003000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11025248 Voucher: 172046 1025325 1025106 1025214 1025409 1025108 2003-295 03-133 17204703/31/2003 007133 ECO-PAN LLC Voucher: 172047 17204803/31/2003000152 ELECTRO PRODUCTS/CABLE 101792 Voucher: 172048 101887 Inv Date Description 02/20/2003 CREATIVE OFFICE - CUSTOr. 02/28/2003 PKRLS-WATER/CLR RNTL A 02/28/2003 PKM-WATER/CLR RNTL ACC 02/28/2003 PKCP-WATERlCLR RNTL AC 02/28/2003 PKCHB-WATER/CL RNTL AC 02/28/2003 PKDBC-WATERlCL RNTL AC 02/28/2003 MC-WATERlCLR RNTL ACC 03/11/2003 MC-PRO TERM JUDGE 1/27 03/19/2003 CD-EXPR-ENCHANTED PKS t 03/14/2003 PKAC-NAMES PLATES/PLAQ 03/11/2003 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES 02/25/2003 MSC-NAMES PLATES/PLAQ 02/18/2003 PKlPL NEWSPAPER LEGAL N 03/03/2003 MS/POL-RMS SERVER UPG- 03/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2753 02/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2449 03/04/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2628 02/27/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#1647 02/07/2003 PS-AMMUNITION:FIREARMS' 02/25/2003 PS-AMMUNTION 180 GR JAC 03/11/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS & TIRES 03/14/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS & TIRES 03/05/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS & TIRES 03/10/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS & TIRES 03/18/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS & TIRES 03/05/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS & TIRES 02/20/2003 PKM-CONCRETE RECLAIMI 02/26/2003 MS/POL COPS MORE 2001- 1 03/12/2003 MS/POL -COPS MORE 2001 Amount Paid 39.17 15.02 13.49 6.53 226.96 95.96 58.97 400.00 775.86 95.20 7.07 11.21 193.80 32,30356 100.00 300.00 90.00 80.00 5,480.00 1.040.00 274.67 18.49 13.32 146.01 561.39 29.35 163.20 190.40 81.60 Check Total 39.17 416.93 400.00 775.86 113.48 193.80 32,303.56 570.00 6,520.00 1,043.23 163.20 272.00 Page: 8 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17204903/31/2003000343 ELEPHANT CAR WASH Voucher: 172049 172050 03/31/2003 006514 ENGINEERING BUSINESS SY 14964 Voucher: 172050 172051 03/31/2003000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0124805 Voucher: 172051 0123731 17205203/31/2003002985 ESRI BUSINESS INFOR SOLU'90709056 Voucher: 172052 17205303/31/2003004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 101850 Voucher: 172053 101876 101875 101685 17205403/31/2003001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR 004725 Voucher: 172054 004722 004723 004727 004697 004726 C2259R13374 Invoice 200 ~ ~ 172055 03/31/2003 007307 EVERGREEN CHURCH Voucher: 172055 172056 03/31/2003 007082 EXPANETS Voucher: 172056 17205703/31/2003006258 EXPRESS BUSINESS SYSTE 30989 Voucher: 172057 17205803/31/2003007279 EYE FOR TALENT 1127 Voucher: 172058 17205903/31/2003001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 135-003 Voucher: 172059 137-003 136-003 134-003 6947710015 14252765 1127 172060 03/31/2003 005285 FADLER, ED Voucher: 172060 172061 03/31/2003000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-607-74153 Voucher: 172061 Inv Date Description 02/28/2003 PS-CAR WASH SERVICE FE 03/04/2003 MSDP-SERVICE & MAINTEN 03/15/2003 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 03/01/2003 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 03/14/2003 MSGIS-ARCINFO ANNUAL M 02/21/2002 PS-VEHICLE SUPPLIES 02/28/2002 PS-VEHICLE SUPPLIES 02/28/2002 PS-VEHICLE SUPPLIES 12/30/2002 PS-VEHICLE SUPPLIES 03/10/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/10/2003 MSFLT-REPAIRIMAINT SVCS 03/10/2003 MSFL T-REPAIRIMAINT SVCS 03/10/2003 MSFL T-REPAIRIMAINT SVCS 03/05/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/10/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/23/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 03/04/2003 MIS-PBX MAINT FOR 2128/0 03/06/2003 M&D-FOLDER/INSERrER YE 03/05/2003 AG03-27:PKDBC-SILK ROAD r 03/15/2003 AG01-59:PKS LANDSCAPE M 03/15/2003 AG01-59:PKS LANDSCAPE M 03/15/2003 AG01-59:PKS LANDSCAPE M 03/15/2003 AG01-59:PKS LANDSCAPE M 03/18/2003 PS-REIMB:EYEWEAR ANNUA 03/14/2003 MSDP-DELIVERY SERVICES \ Amount Paid 607.39 227.63 6,422.09 5.390.66 8,660.23 110.98 32.64 114.24 95.74 116.66 114.41 146.31 32.59 211.49 32.59 75.52 1,529.12 1,194.60 1,250.00 438.46 311.17 148.51 254.60 50.00 7.25 Check Total 607.39 227.63 11,812.75 8,660.23 353.60 654.05 75.52 1,529.12 1,194.60 1,250.00 1,152.74 50.00 7.25 Page: 9 apChklst 0313112003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 172062 03/31/2003 004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR Voucher: 172062 Invoice 004625 004590 04591 004637 004579 004580 004589 172063 03/31/2003 004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION S 0304FWPDFEB Voucher: 172063 17206403/31/2003001183 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOAPR02912 Voucher: 172064 17206503/31/2003001593 FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC 15188 Voucher: 172065 17206603/31/2003002955 FERREllS FIRE EXTINGUISH 2269 '"'T) Voucher: 172066 2210 'ë- 2268 2270 2271 0240-48 17206703/31/2003002862 FIEDLER, WALTER Voucher: 172067 17206803/31/2003003066 FIRESTONE TIRE & SERVICE 025599 Voucher: 172068 17206903/31/2003003729 FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTA20094157 Voucher: 172069 17207003/31/2003001686 FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MAOO020364 Voucher: 172070 172071 03/3112003 000738 G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY 74695 Voucher: 172071 17207203/31/2003004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC49047 Voucher: 172072 17207303/31/2003007302 GAHAN. ROXANA Voucher: 172073 17207403/31/2003005733 GIGGLE WORKS Voucher: 172074 74695 CA25891 2003-6 Inv Date Description 03/01/2003 CDPL-LEGALS- 02/15/2003 PKM-NEWSPAPER ADS/IN 02/15/2003 CDPL-LEGALS- 03/08/2003 CDPL-LEGALS- 02/12/2003 PKM-NEWSPAPER ADS/IN 02/12/2003 PKM-NEWSPAPER ADS/IN 02/15/2003 PKM-NEWSPAPER ADS/IN 03/28/2003 PS-LUNCH:OFFICER PATRO 03/13/2003 PKM-UTILITY SVC/CONTRAC 02/20/2003 PS-VEHICLE TOWING SVC F 02/28/2003 PKM-FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 03/03/2003 PKM-FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 02/28/2003 PKM-FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 02/28/2003 PKM-FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 02/28/2003 PKM-FIRE EXTINGUISHER S 03/05/2003 PKM-WORK BOOTS/FIEDL 03/10/2003 PS-CITY VEHICLES TIRES & ~ 02/2712003 MSDP/ALL-METROSCAN AN 02/2712003 MSHR-COPIER RPR,MNT.SU 03/2012003 PKM-RAINGEAR FOR SEASO 03/11/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR SUPPLIES 01/0812003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2589 02/06/2003 PS-ENTERTAINMENT SVC 03 Amount Paid 252.32 51.04 109.56 102.92 53.12 53.12 51.04 143.75 65.48 122.94 187.14 73.98 106.62 199.65 88.13 119.68 19.03 1,450.30 429.87 131.91 65.82 45.00 500.00 Check Total 673.12 143.75 65.48 122.94 655.52 119.68 19.03 1,450.30 429.87 131.91 65.82 45.00 500.00 Page: 10 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17207503/31/2003702066 GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT 02-42789 Voucher: 172075 172076 03/31/2003 000179 GREEN, CHRIS MSC GRI Voucher: 172076 172077 03/31/2003 003210 HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC 4951 Voucher: 172077 17207803/31/2003004381 HUMMINGBIRD COMMUNICA190016369 Voucher: 172078 17207903/31/2003003256 HURLEY ENGINEERING COM 413350 S Voucher: 172079 17208003/31/2003 002137 INLAND FOUNDRY COMPAN 30032 Voucher: 172080 172081 03/31/2003004834 INPRINT PRINTING COMPAN 14844 Voucher: 172081 .:D 17208203/31/2003004605 IPTM-INST OF POLICE TECHtl2200305136 -J Voucher: 172082 17208303/31/2003003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I F168880 Voucher: 172083 172084 03/31/2003 005978 JACKSON, LAURIE PS 3, Voucher: 172084 17208503/31/2003007241 JACO ENVIRONMENTAL INC 1861 Voucher: 172085 17208603/31/2003007275 JASCO. DIVISION OF JOHNSC7866 Voucher: 172086 17208703/31/2003004486 JONES & JONES 3/1/0 Voucher: 172087 17208803/31/2003007157 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATI0013397 Voucher: 172088 17208903/31/2003005934 K P TRANSLATION SERVICE CA66552 Voucher: 172089 CA20716 17209003/31/2003700317 KENNETH R ANDERSON &, A 400 Voucher: 172090 172091 03/31/2003001259 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIM FEB 2003 Voucher: 172091 Invoice MSC GREEN PS 3/17103 3/1/03 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/12/2003 PW-REFUND 100% BOND R 15,524.00 15,524.00 03/24/2003 MSC - WMCA CONFERENCE 266.29 266.29 03/01/2003 AG01-128: DUMAS BAY REST 263.75 263.75 03/13/2003 MSDP-ANNUAL SUPPORT/M 910.27 910.27 03/11/2003 PKMT/REPAIR BOILER AT ST 173.64 173.64 03/17/2003 SWM-VANED GRATE 372.10 372.10 03/21/2003 MSHR-PRIN'G FOREIGN BU 211.07 211.07 01/13/2003 PS-POLICE TRAINING SERVI 575.00 575.00 02/28/2003 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE S 953.91 953.91 03/17/2003 PS-PER DIEM REIMB:LAURIE 170.00 170.00 03/07/2003 PWS-RECYCLE SVCS CASE 25.00 25.00 02/19/2003 PKM-PANELS/MOLDING/SCR 297.79 297.79 03/01/2003 MSHR-CITY SHIRTS/UNIFOR 284.88 284.88 02/25/2003 AG02-136:POTENTIAL ANNE) 48,062.60 48,062.60 02/14/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 6655 160.00 02/27/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2071 80.00 240.00 03/11/2003 PKM-SURVEY SERVICES 1,200.00 1,200.00 03/24/2003 MSF-REMIT CRIME VICTIM F 1,402.01 1,402.01 Page: 11 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 172092 03/31/2003 000125 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIV 1230582 Voucher: 172092 1233414 17209303/31/2003005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI201565 Voucher: 172093 172094 03/31/2003 000564 KING COUNTY PET LICENSE FEB 2003 Voucher: 172094 17209503/31/2003003898 KING COUNTY RADIO Voucher: 172095 \\ <::5> 302160 37997 38025 36766 37971 36501 17209603/31/2003003137 KING COUNTY-TREASURY DI 292104904308 Voucher: 172096 292104901106 666491046007 218000129005 218000139103 302104916309 032104920908 032104921005 666491047005 122103914604 926500036005 112103905108 926480016001 797820016203 092104902603 072104918106 17209703/31/2003000201 KINKO'S INC. ACCOUNT #020 515100067505 Voucher: 172097 515100067493 515100067589 515100067626 515100067581 PS 2/26/03 17209803/31/2003007278 KRUSEY, KC. (CASEY) Voucher: 172098 Inv Date Description 02/24/2003 PS-KING CO JAIL(JAN 1 - 31/ 03/06/2003 PWST-DEBRIS DUMPED IN R 03/13/2003 PKM-MATERIALS/SUPPLIES f 03/24/2003 MSF-REMIT KC PET FEES R 02/28/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 02/26/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 02/26/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 02/26/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 02/26/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 02/26/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 03/01/2003 PKM 2003 PROP TAX 292104 03/01/2003 PKM-2003 PROP TAX 29210 03/01/2003 PKM-2003 PROP TAX 66649 03/01/2003 ARMSTRONG TAX 218000 03/01/2003 ARMSTRONG TAX 218000 03/01/2003 ARMSTRONG PROP TAX 30 03/01/2003 PKM-TAX 032104-9209-08 03/01/2003 PKM-TAX 032104-9210-05 03/01/2003 PKM 2003 PROP TAX 666491 03/01/2003 DBC-2003 PROP TAX;- 03/01/2003 CHB/2003 PROP TAX 926500 03/01/2003 PKM-PROPTAX 112103-90 03/01/2003 KLCC-2003 PROP TAX 92648 03/01/2003 PKM/2003 PROP TAX 797820 03/01/2003 PKM-2003 PROP TAX 09210 03/01/2003 PKM-PROP TAX 072104-91 03/07/2003 CDA-PRINTING SERVICES 03/06/2003 PKKFT-PRINTING SVCS 03/14/2003 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS SKA 03/17/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 03/13/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES TRÞ 02/26/2003 PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI Amount Paid 50,419.71 63.49 240.89 779.00 4,393.00 2.24 89.00 44.50 66.75 89.00 41.89 41.89 39.00 0.89 0.79 1.25 5.00 5.00 13.91 1,210.42 693.18 305.45 203.91 41.89 41.89 41.89 53.26 365.57 203.73 544.00 337.28 103.46 Check Total 50,483.20 240.89 779.00 4,684.49 2,688.25 1,503.84 103.46 Page: 12 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17209903/31/2003000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI 2926402 Voucher: 172099 3075201 2926501 3075301 99902 101103 2957001 279301 2830801 2573402 3050801 1768602 1639103 3075401 12003286MB 1'\ -::::ç, 172100 03/31/2003 001963 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC Voucher: 172100 172101 03/31/2003001939 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 0013644 Voucher: 172101 17210203/31/2003005076 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGE 0037471-IN Voucher: 172102 0038470-IN 17210303/31/2003007050 LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIE 9 Voucher: 172103 7A 172104 03/31/2003 004934 LAYMAN, SANDRA CA26556 Voucher: 172104 CA26556 17210503/31/2003005478 LEBEL, SHELLEY EMPL REIMB Voucher: 172105 17210603/31/2003004386 LEIDER, DAVID Voucher: 172106 17210703/31/2003005303 LEWIS, ENOCH Voucher: 172107 17210803/31/2003000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC 63992 Voucher: 172108 17210903/31/2003007311 MACE. MICHAEL C Voucher: 172109 PKM 2/28/03 jnv Date Description 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/14/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/14/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKDBC-SEWER SVCS - 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/11/2003 PKM- UTILITIES 03/04/2003 PWS-EZ STREET ASPHALT 02/28/2003 CDPL-ENV REV:COLELLA ES 01/15/2003 POLICE TARGET SUPPLIES 03/05/2003 PS-POLICE TARGET SUPPLIE 02/20/2003 AG02-125:PUBLIC DEFENDEF 01/24/2003 AG02-125:PUBLIC DEFENDE 03/04/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2655 03/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2655 03/21/2003 PRCS-EMPLOYEE EXPENSE 02/28/2003 PKM-WORK JEANS/LEIDER 010995211605 03/06/2003 PKM-WORK JEANS/LEWIS 03-41538 02/18/2003 PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL 03/07/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC Amount Paid 110.16 98.72 98.28 98.28 30.16 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 402.46 304.62 122.00 481.92 196.03 632.50 8278 11,538.50 4,253.50 56.43 56.20 259.58 135.95 101.68 93.87 75.00 Check Total 1,351.56 481.92 196.03 715.28 15,792.00 112.63 259.58 135.95 101.68 93.87 75.00 Page: 13 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 17211203/31/2003007281 MAHER, PATRICK ~ Voucher: 172112 ~~ 17211303/31/2003005307 MALLOTT'S FINISHING TOUC 012365 otJ Voucher: 172113 172114 03/31/2003 000960 MATTHEW BENDER & COMP 4987895001 Voucher: 172114 17211503/31/2003005407 MCCOLGAN. DEAN CC MO Voucher: 172115 17211603/31/2003004182 MCDONOUGH & SONS INC 126577 Voucher: 172116 172117 03/31/2003001064 METROPOLITAN PARK DIST 149557 Voucher: 172117 17211803/31/2003007303 MILLER, LEZLlE CA205~ Voucher: 172118 17211903/31/2003004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERN 5307 Voucher: 172119 17212003/31/2003003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE MODERN SEC Voucher: 172120 172121 03/31/2003001843 MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE ¡896-APRIU03 Voucher: 172121 898-APR/03 897-APRl03 899-APRl03 2681APRIL 03 220280 Check # Date Vendor 17211003/31/2003005043 MACHINERY POWER & EQU Voucher: 172110 172111 03/31/2003004431 MADRONA PLANNING DVLP Voucher: 172111 17212203/31/2003000089 NEWS TRIBUNE Voucher: 172122 Invoice G0184001 00002800-2 00002800-1 00002800 00002800-6 00002800-4 00002800-5 00002800-3 PS 3/11/03 Inv Date Description 03/06/2003 EQUIPMENT RENTAL OF CA 03/01/2003 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 03/01/2003 CD EPR: PAVILION CENTRE I 03/01/2003 CDPL-PLN EXP REV:ST FRA 03/01/2003 CD-EXPR-EAST CAMPUS LO 03/01/2003 CD EPR: TRUMAN HIGH SCH 03/01/2003 CD EPR: TRUMAN HIGH SCH 03/01/2003 CD EPR: TRUMAN HIGH SCH 03/11/2003 PS-REIMB:VEHICLE SHIPPIN 02/18/2003 PS-UPHOLSTERY CLEANING 02/28/2003 MATTHEW BENDER - LAW R CC MCCOLGA 03/11/2003 PARKING REIMB AT SEATAC 03/15/2003 AG01-95:PKM-PKNG LOT VA CA20551 03/12/2003 PKRCS-SO BKB TOURN. EN 02/05/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2055 03/14/2003 SWR-PRINTING COMPOST S 02/28/2003 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S 03/26/2003 AG99-139A:MC BLDG LEASE~ 03/26/2003 AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASE 03/26/2003 AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASE 03/26/2003 AG98-212B:PS BLDG LEASES 03/26/2003 AG93-51:KLCC PARKING LO 03/02/2003 MSHR-JOB AD 2/3/03-3/2/03 Amount Paid 659.33 19.80 49.80 49.80 270.00 334.80 19.80 270.00 1,692.50 90.00 4.21 123.96 47.60 35.00 120.00 34.12 34.82 6,646.00 13.334.60 4,571.40 3,106.00 499.41 1,509.71 Check Total 659.33 1,014.00 1,692.50 90.00 4.21 123.96 47.60 35.00 120.00 34.12 34.82 28,157.41 1,509.71 Page: 14 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17212303/31/2003006200 NORTHWEST NEXUS INC 323-14677 Voucher: 172123 172124 03/31/2003 005386 NORTHWEST PARENT PUBL 6466422 Voucher: 172124 17212503/31/2003000708 NRPA-NAT'L REC & PARK AS 15772 Voucher: 172125 NAQ 3/03 17212603/31/2003005117 NWPMA-NW PAVEMENT MG 203006 Voucher: 172126 172127 03/31/2003 003529 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SE 67746-001 02/27/2003 PS-POLICE PRE-EMPL YMT P Voucher: 172127 68196-001 02/27/2003 PS- PRE-PHYSICAL HAZMAT 17212803/31/2003000891 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN843119011000 03/05/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES-BATT Voucher: 172128 813106516000 02/19/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES-MAGI -,..\ 17212903/31/2003 005678 OKANOGAN COUNTY JAIL JANUARY 2003 01/31/2003 PS-JAIL SERVICES (JAN/03) , ) Voucher: 172129 1:. 17213003/31/2003000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 017504 Voucher: 172130 017790 172131 03/31/2003000705 OSBORNE INNOVATIVE PRO 0000536-IN Voucher: 172131 0000722-IN 17213203/31/2003702235 OWEN, PATRICIA 0341561 Voucher: 172132 17213303/31/2003006010 OWL FENCING INC Voucher: 172133 17213403/31/2003 002545 PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC Voucher: 172134 17213503/31/2003000112 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC Voucher: 172135 Invoicè 950 79622 79451 FOCS86926 259202 FOCS86734 FOCS87899 17213603/31/2003004004 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC FEB/03 Voucher: 172136 MAR/03 17213703/31/2003004644 PACIFIC PLANTS INC 36839 Voucher: 172137 36885 17213803/31/2003007178 PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY (08131938 Voucher: 172138 Inv Date Description 03/05/2003 MSGAC-MTHL Y INTERNET S 02/03/2003 PRCS-SUMMER DAY CAMP A 03/21/2003 PKM-ASSOCIATION DUESI K 02/19/2003 PRCS-NRPAAQUATIC CONF 03/18/2003 PWS-PAVING CONFERENCE 03/11/2003 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 03/21/2003 PWST-MAINTENANCEIREPAI 03/06/2003 PKM-DIAMOND PUMP 03/18/2003 PKM-DIAMOND PUMP CAP 03/27/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 03/07/2003 PKM-CELEBRATION PARK G 03/13/2003 AG01-08B:KNUTZEN-HVAC S 03/15/2003 AG01-08B:KNUTZEN-HVAC S 02/17/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 01/24/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 02/06/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 03/05/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 02/01/2003 SIU-POLICE VEHICLES LEASI 03/01/2003 SIU-POLICE VEHICLES LEASI 01/10/2003 PKiPL-PLANTS FOR ALEA PR 01/14/2003 PKiPL-PLANTS FOR ALEA PR 02/27/2003 PKM-ADA TOILET Amount Paid Check Total 500.00 500.00 150.00 150.00 65.00 515.00 580.00 50.00 50.00 385.00 187.00 572.00 78.27 6.30 84.57 1,302.00 1,302.00 20.66 18.37 39.03 99.84 15.96 115.80 75.00 75.00 1,904.00 1,904.00 139.26 770.62 909.88 612.54 541.50 220.61 262.59 1,637.24 1,015.01 1,015.01 2,030.02 8,539.21 1,668.28 10,207.49 728.34 728.34 Page: 15 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17213903/31/2003 005290 PACIFIC SCIENCE CENTER Voucher: 172139 17214003/31/2003006440 PAPE MACINERY INC Voucher: 172140 172141 03/31/2003001814 PARAMETRIX INC Voucher: 172141 17214203/31/2003004415 PARK, MICHAEL Voucher: 172142 17214303/31/2003000885 PARKER PAINT MANUFACTUF122456 Voucher: 172143 119722CR 119716 119526 119724 104847 Invoice C2318R13371 C2318R13372 2392600 2394400 01-62039 CC M PARK " 17214403/31/2003003088 PART WORKS lNG, THE \7 Voucher: 172144 ~ 17214503/31/2003005025 PCCI - PROFESSIONAL COMIII20966 Voucher: 172145 20965 17214603/31/2003000101 PETTY CASH CD 3/25/03 Voucher: 172146 17214703/31/2003001189 PETTY CASH CM 3/21/03 Voucher: 172147 17214803/31/2003002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MPKM 3/21/03 Voucher: 172148 17214903/31/2003002822 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CEDBC 03/24/03 Voucher: 172149 17215003/31/2003006161 PICKLEBALL STUFF Voucher: 172150 172151 03/31/2003001612 POLLARD GROUP INC Voucher: 172151 17215203/31/2003001411 POSTAL EXPRESS INC BM2301008 Voucher: 172152 BM2302003 17215303/31/2003000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 578842 Voucher: 172153 17215403/31/2003004788 PROPERTY DAMAGE APPRA CIT455001 Voucher: 172154 CM 3/21/03 02080 61132 Inv Date Description 03/23/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 03/23/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 03/04/2003 PKM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL- B 02/27/2003 PKM-EQUIPMENT RENTAL - J 02128/2003 AG02-109:CHRISTIAN FAITH ( 03/13/2003 GROUND TRANSPORTATIO 03/06/2003 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES 02/27/2003 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES 02/27/2003 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES 02/27/2003 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES 02/27/2003 PKM-PAINT SUPPLIES 03/04/2003 PKDBC-FACILITY REPAIR SU 03/01/2003 AG03-22:MAINT OFFICE JNT 03/01/2003 AG03-22:STEEL LK-JNTRL S 03/25/2003 CDL - MILEAGEICHAMBERLAI 03/21/2003 GROUND TRANSP. REIMB T 03/21/2003 PKM-PETTY CASH FUND RE 03/24/2003 PKDBC-FILE BOXES:STORIN 03/04/2003 PRCS-PICKLEBALLS FOR SR 03/17/2003 MSHR-BUSINESS CARDS 01/31/2003 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COl 02/28/2003 CITY MAIL PROCESSING/COl 02/11/2003 AG02-124:LAW-LEGAL SERVI 01/27/2003 LOSS DATE 12/6/01 CLAIMAN Amount Paid 726.82 150.00 897.60 32.64 16,930.93 69.82 203.90 -2.72 159.27 55.10 2.13 97.92 375.00 333.33 313.90 278.24 43.13 128.82 29.92 282.40 5,841.12 4,334.90 3,882.67 77.00 Check Total 876.82 930.24 16,930.93 69.82 417.68 97.92 708.33 313.90 278.24 43.13 128.82 29.92 282.40 10,176.02 3,882.67 77.00 Page: 16 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17215503/31/2003000512 PUGET SOUND BUSINESS J 01040668 Voucher: 172155 17215603/31/2003000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 345-200-2003 Voucher: 172156 109-922-1002 918-041-1002 722-288-1000 319-041-1003 002-141-1004 102-141-1002 711-141-1000 177-159-1003 954-567-1001 376-488-6325 519-842-1009 439-922-1003 31283 11 ~ ~ 17215703/31/2003005977 PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS I Voucher: 172157 17215803/31/2003 700536 QUADRANT CORPORATION Voucher: 172158 17215903/31/2003000202 QWEST Voucher: 172159 02-36174 2062040609 2538159920 2536301529 115684 17216003/31/2003000667 RADIOSHACK INC Voucher: 172160 172161 03/31/2003 004285 RAINIER BLOWER SERVICE I 8544 Voucher: 172161 8545 17216203/31/2003001139 RED WING SHOE STORE 13200075000 Voucher: 172162 17216303/31/2003006873 REGENCY CLEANERS 18432 Voucher: 172163 17216403/31/2003007293 RIVER ROAD LANDSCAPE SU116404 Voucher: 172164 17216503/31/2003007107 ROEDA SIGNS INC & SCREEN63264 Voucher: 172165 18432 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 02/24/2003 MSA-RENEWAL PSBJ SBSCP 78.95 78.95 03/12/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 2,825.73 03/10/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 1,306.22 03/10/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 721.40 03/10/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 222.70 03/10/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 114.27 03/10/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 20.70 03/10/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 5.84 03/10/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 6.58 03/06/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 5.84 02124/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 5.89 03/11/2003 PS-ELECTRICITY CHARGES 4,538.28 03/11/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 3,483.79 03/12/2003 PKM - UTLITIES 2,943.02 16,200.26 03/10/2003 PS-BOTTLED WATER SVC 391.68 391.68 03/06/2003 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS 12,208.00 12,208.00 03/04/2003 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 3 4,592.92 03/04/2003 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 3 63.65 02/28/2003 MSTEL-PHONEIDATA SVC 2 42.14 4,698.71 03/17/2003 PKM- REPAIR SUPPLIES 22.26 22.26 02/13/2003 PKM-LANDSCAPE SUPPLIE 1,077.12 02/13/2003 PKM-LANDSCAPE SUPPLIE 1,077.12 2,154.24 03/05/2003 PKM-WORK BOOTS/LEIDER 160.00 160.00 03/01/2003 AG02-98:PS DRY CLNG SVC 2,379.40 2,379.40 02/24/2003 CD/HS YARD BARK FOR NEI 84.32 84.32 03/07/2003 SWR-RECYCLING CONTAIN 52.08 52.08 Page: 17 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17216603/31/2003700984 SAINT PAULS EPISCOPAL CH C2041 R13370 Voucher: 172166 17216703/31/2003003174 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPME553402 Voucher: 172167 553386 17216803/31/2003007294 SAND, ERIN 3/7/03 Voucher: 172168 17216903/31/2003006241 SCHROEDER, JEANNE Voucher: 172169 172170 03/31/2003 000055 SEATTLE TIMES Voucher: 172170 172171 03/31/2003000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC Voucher: 172171 PS 3/18/03 070171006 303141095 303131008 302281002 303131003 CA24313 \\ ~ 172172 03/31/2003 005539 SEMISI-TUPOU. VAIVAO Voucher: 172172 17217303/31/2003005340 SENIOR SERVICES OF SEAT FEB 2003 Voucher: 172173 17217403/31/2003001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY 306/55 Voucher: 172174 17217503/31/2003002231 SHELDON & ASSOCIATES IN 96974 Voucher: 172175 97002 17217603/31/2003001480 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 0567-9 Voucher: 172176 172177 03/31/2003 007306 SHORE. LYNN 03-01-: Voucher: 172177 17217803/31/2003007314 SIMPLY STATED PHOTOGRAf1048 Voucher: 172178 17217903/31/2003000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI28517 Voucher: 172179 28645 28588 172180 03/31/2003 002405 SMITH PUBLISHERS LLC. M L 8606267-B4 Voucher: 172180 172181 03/31/2003007308 SOUND CHRISTIAN FELLOWEC2385R13373 Voucher: 172181 306/5574 03-01-210324 Inv Date Description 03/23/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 03/06/2003 PS-POLICE EQUIPMENT 03/05/2003 PS-POLICE EQUIPMENT 03/07/2003 PKRCS-PARKING FEE-REC T 03/18/2003 PS-REIMB:KC CHIEFS ASSO 01/03/2003 MSHR-NEWSPAPER AD 03/18/2003 PS-AIRFARE: CITY TRAVEL K 03/13/2003 PS-AIRF ARE 4/12/03-4/18/03 E 02/28/2003 PS-AIRFARE:CITY TRAVEL A 03/13/2003 PS-AIRFARE 7/12/03-7/18/03 ~ 02/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2431 03/07/2003 PRCS-SENIOR MEAL PROGR 03/06/2003 PKRLS-LiNEN SERVICES AC 02/06/2003 CDPL-ENV REV:STARKOVIC 02/26/2003 CDPL-ENV REV:STARKOVIC 02/27/2003 PKICHB: FACILITIES PAINT S 03/07/2003 OVERSPRAY PAINT. LOSS D 03/27/2003 CC-PHOTOGRAPHY 411/03 F 02/27/2003 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 03/13/2003 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 03/18/2003 CRIMINAL - PLEA FORMS - P 03/04/2003 WASHINGTON EMPLOYMEN 03/23/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE Amount Paid 83.20 1,724.65 1,437.92 93.52 192.87 1,019.25 219.00 302.50 251.50 1.024.44 119.25 292.75 20.50 1,063.92 754.18 16152 288.54 688.16 236.42 250.26 451.19 247.00 129.00 Check Total 83.20 3,162.57 93.52 192.87 1,019.25 1,797.44 119.25 292.75 20.50 1,818.10 161.52 288.54 688.16 937.87 247.00 129.00 Page: 18 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11:46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY page: 19 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 172182 03/31/2003 004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC Voucher: 172182 012926 012890 012856 012891 02-42207 17218303/31/2003700928 SPIEKER PROPERTIES Voucher: 172183 17218403/31/2003003600 SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES I 2003-042 Voucher: 172184 17218503/31/2003002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL 1-336322 Voucher: 172185 1-336289 17218603/31/2003005933 STUART PARKS ASSOCIATE 200629 Voucher: 172186 172187 03/31/2003 005891 SUDDEN IMAGE INC Voucher: 172187 ì'\ 172188 03/31/2003 004356 SUMPTER, KYLE ~ Voucher: 172188 "^' 17218903/31/2003007312 SUNG, CHI L Voucher: 172189 17219003/31/2003000341 SUNRISE SELF STORAGE A84/03 Voucher: 172190 172191 03/31/2003 007246 SWENSON. ALAN CA2784 Voucher: 172191 17219203/31/2003007292 TACOMA COMMUNITY COLL TCC 4/24/03 Voucher: 172192 17219303/31/2003000588 TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 007-307-501 Voucher: 172193 17219403/31/2003000873 TARGET STORES DIVISION, ,111103372519 Voucher: 172194 17219503/31/2003003085 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION2043020 Voucher: 172195 17219603/31/2003006255 TEKS SERVICES, INC 2268 Voucher: 172196 17219703/31/2003005321 TOSCO/FLEET SERVICES 9642889 Voucher: 172197 2890 PS 3/16/03 03-41569 CA27841 2268 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/01/2003 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 212.40 02/28/2003 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 54.00 02/26/2003 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 380.00 02/28/2003 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 150.00 796.40 03/14/2003 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS 11,904.00 11,904.00 03/17/2003 AG03-24:LlVESCAN INTERFAI 14,640.00 14,640.00 03/03/2003 PKM-ST LK PEST CONTROL ~ 89.22 03/03/2003 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC 52.22 141.44 02/27/2003 PS-POLICE TRAINING LAURI 650.00 650.00 03/09/2003 PS-PHOTO SERVICES 720.02 720.02 03/16/2003 PS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEMEI 81.34 81.34 03/27/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 75.00 03/10/2003 PS-MTHL Y STRGE RENTAL F 165.00 165.00 03/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2784 50.00 50.00 03/17/2003 PS-TCC JOB FAIR:PS RECRU 75.00 75.00 03/06/2003 PKM- WATER SERVICE @ P 21.23 21.23 03/06/2003 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 48.26 48.26 03/04/2003 MSDP- ARCSERVE UPG PIN 744.45 744.45 03/28/2003 PWSWR-BROCHURE POST 3,189.64 3,189.64 03/06/2003 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 82.67 82.67 Page: 19 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 17219803/31/2003 006164 TRAINBUILDER PRODUCTION063030703 Voucher: 172198 17219903/31/2003002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 14921 Voucher: 172199 14479 11881 000F80F48113 000F6588V093 000F6588V113 000F6588V103 172201 03/31/2003 000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO I 5704092CR Voucher: 172201 5496325CR 5453645CR 5719718 SC23688 5718820 5745750 5724448 5749247 17220203/31/2003005019 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWE31767941-001 Voucher: 172202 17220303/31/2003 003563 VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS (0000896 Voucher: 172203 17220403/31/2003 005599 VAUSE. GREG Voucher: 172204 17220503/31/2003001124 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher: 172205 17220603/31/2003000094 WA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFI L44435 Voucher: 172206 17220703/31/2003004339 WA STATE DEPT OF PERSON35583 Voucher: 172207 17220803/31/2003000340 WA STATE INFORMATION S Voucher: 172208 17220903/31/2003 000851 WA STATE PATROL Voucher: 172209 Check # Date Vendor 17220003/31/2003003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Voucher: 172200 ~ Invoice EMPL REIMB 1004-652615 2003020222 2003020220 10301882 Inv Date Description 03/05/2003 PRCS-LEGO INSTRUCTION F 03/06/2003 PKRCS-CHICKEN QUISADEL 03/03/2003 PKRCS-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 02/15/2003 PKRCS-SWEETHEART DANC 03/15/2003 PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S 03/01/2003 PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S 03/15/2003 PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S 03/08/2003 PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S 12/11/2002 PKM-RETURN IRRIGATION S 06/06/2002 PKM- 04/30/2002 PKM-RETURN IRRIGATION S 01/09/2003 PKlPL: IRRIGATION SUPPLIEi 02/28/2003 PKM-PAST DUE FEE 01/08/2003 PKlMT: IRRIGATION SUPPLIE 02/19/2003 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 01/07/2003 PKlPL: IRRIGATION SUPPLIEi 02/25/2003 PKM-IRRIGATION SUPPLIESI 03/12/2003 PWS-REPAIRIMAINT SUPPL 03/11/2003 PS-EMER DISPATCH SVCS M 03/25/2003 PS-REIMB:SHIPPING/INSURA 03/05/2003 MSTEL-CELL AIR TIME 316/ 03/13/2003 MSF-AUDIT SVCS:FEB 2003 03/14/2003 MSA- COMMUNICATING W/ D 03/04/2003 MSDP/RR-NEW AUTOCAD L 03/04/2003 MSTEL-SCAN SERVICE FEB ; 03/04/2003 MSHR-BACKGROUND CHEC Amount Paid 150.00 38,01 35.10 119.47 39.59 20.25 8.63 16.44 -110.14 -79.34 -17.08 53.76 72.78 362.21 145.79 4.642.76 344.63 10.07 145,286.00 306.27 503.22 22,081.79 240.00 10,343.69 839.87 10.00 Check Total 150.00 192.58 84.91 5,415.37 1007 145,286.00 306.27 503.22 22,081.79 240.00 11,183.56 10.00 Page: 20 apChkLst 03/31/2003 11 :46:00AM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17221003/31/2003000514 WA STATE-STATE REVENUE FEB 2003 Voucher: 172210 17221103/31/2003006853 WAHl, PRAN Voucher: 172211 17221203/31/2003006007 WALKER ACE HARDWARE Voucher: 172212 17221303/31/2003000783 WASTE MANAGEMENT Voucher: 172213 17221403/31/2003003500 WESCOM COMMUNICATIO 13295 Voucher: 172214 17221503/31/2003005787 WESCRAFT INC Voucher: 172215 .\ 17221603/31/2003001241 WEST COAST AWARDS ~ Voucher: 172216 ~ 172217 03/31/2003 006116 WEST GROUP PAYMENT CE 803870391 Voucher: 172217 17221803/31/2003005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL3229 Voucher: 172218 2124 17221903/31/2003003380 WILSON, BRIAN 0216a Voucher: 172219 17222003/31/2003000428 WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASS SKAM 03 JH Voucher: 172220 SKAM 03 JM SKAM 03 MF 172221 03/31/2003004440 WSLEFIA-WA STATE LAW E WSLEFIA2003 Voucher: 172221 17222203/31/2003005722 YAKIMA COUNTY DEPARTMEIFEB 2003 Voucher: 172222 17222303/31/2003007273 YELLOW TRANSPORTATION 1242-002519 Voucher: 172223 172224 03/31/2003 000947 YOUR INC Voucher: 172224 17222503/31/2003007313 ZAYKA, STELLA M Voucher: 172225 CA66281 0009136316 0009329616 002463510558 REPAIRS 39446 2924 03-41562 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/24/2003 MSF-REMIT STATE FEES FE 67,159.52 67,159.52 02/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#6628 100.00 100.00 02/26/2003 PKM-SPRAYER/FUNNEUREE 33.24 03/12/2003 PKDBC-CONST TOOLS/EQP f 17.38 50,62 03/01/2003 PWSWR-LiTTER DISPOSAL F 334.93 334.93 02/28/2003 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST 97.92 97.92 03/27/2003 VEHICLE REPAIRS BATTERY 151.23 151.23 03/10/2003 PKM-UNIFORM CLOTHING 2,011.77 2,011.77 03/01/2003 MSDP-DATABASE/COMM CH 1,130.68 1,130.68 03/11/2003 PS-9MMAMMO 271.78 02/28/2003 PS-FIRING RANGE USE 91.39 363.17 03/12/2003 PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM 139.41 139.41 03/11/2003 WRPA CONF-SKAMANIA-- 255.00 03/11/2003 PRCS-WRPA CONF FEES SK 265.00 03/11/2003 PRCS-WRPA CONF DUES- S 255.00 775.00 03/11/2003 PS-POLICE FIREARMS TRAI 80.00 80.00 03/06/2003 PS-JAIL SERVICES (FEB/03) I 9,172.80 9,172.80 01/17/2003 PS/SRT- CRT STC WEATHEF 182.62 182.62 03/20/2003 AG02-48:PS/JANITORIAL SV 1,629.40 1,629.40 03/07/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 100.00 100.00 Page: 21 '" '" ëD '" .. a.. >- ~ -...J :¡~ ""w "'0 "w c3u. ~~ ¡¡:~ 13 ,.., -0 "0 ...J", ""- 0:... o£:! ...,.., .. 0 '" a ,..: <J) '" ,..: <0 I'- N N Qj 0> '" (L :,¿ c:: .. .a '" ::I ~ ii Š .a ::I I/ :¡;; c( 0 0 cD -,; ... ... f~ .., N ëÞ "" co Q. >- ~ -...I ~~ ""w gß 13u.. -u.. :go ¡¡:~ ë3 :::¡¡; ~ 0 cD ~ .- .- .., -0 "0 ...IN ""- .I:..- ()t! 0..., CO 0 ..,. a ,.: en ..,. ,....- IX) ,.... (') N i¡j "" co Cl. ~ u .. .I:. () :;¡: õi Õ I- 'C C f! (! .¿ 0 a. I!! .. f¡ .5 .. "" u .. .I:. U en .., N p2-1 '<t N åi '" co - .11. > ~ ÛÎ....I :ic:i ""w ua "w c311. -II. ~o ü:~ <3 CO) -0 "0 ....IN ""- "'..- ()t! CoCO) CO 0 :¡¡ 0« 0 0 cë ~ ..- ..- ~ ¡¡; 0> (1 CL '" a .,0 'õi~ ¡¡; at! ... 8 ¡,; 10 -g 'It. ..- u ""~ ... Ur-- C ".... co '" III () p~ apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 1 Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17222604/02/2003007316 AMERICAN SAFETY CASUAL RETAIN REL Voucher: 172226 17222704/02/2003002108 KODO CONSTRUCTION INC RETAIN REL Voucher: 172227 17222804/02/2003007315 WA STATE-PUBLIC WORKS CRETAIN REL Voucher: 172228 17222904/04/2003007266 KAWSHUN "D" SAFETY CLO SAFETY STN Voucher: 172229 17223004/08/2003 007331 MAIL ADVERTISING BUREAU 31249 Voucher: 172230 l' 172231 04/11/2003007351 EASTER, MELVIN 01-47815 Voucher: 172231 ~ 17223204/15/2003000332 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS I 0058818-1 Voucher: 172232 17223304/15/2003004895 ABOU-ZAKI, KAMAL CA#0211. Voucher: 172233 17223404/15/2003007348 ABSHER CONSTRUCTION C 02-48400 Voucher: 172234 17223504/15/2003004234 ABT TOWING OF FEDERAL W7031 Voucher: 172235 172236 04/15/2003 000109 ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL 13208 Voucher: 172236 13210 17223704/15/2003700084 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 02-104759-00 Voucher: 172237 17223804/15/2003007318 ADVANCED SAFETY & FIRE S104772 Voucher: 172238 105000 17223904/15/2003006219 AELE PUBLICATIONS 30401P05 Voucher: 172239 17224004/15/2003007191 AIRPRO EQUIPMENT INC Voucher: 172240 01-47815 CA#021122 11623 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 04/02/2003 PW-RET RELEASE AGOO-13 167,479.54 167,479.54 04/02/2003 PW-RET RELEASE AGOO-13 27,500.00 27,500.00 04/02/2003 PW-RET RELEASE AGOO-13 19,808.79 19,808.79 03/27/2003 PS-ENTERTAINMENT:SAFET 100.00 100.00 04/08/2003 CM-PRE-POSTAGE FOR SPR 5,040.00 5,040.00 04/11/2003 MSF-REFUND KC PET LICE 5500 55.00 03/30/2003 CRIMINAL MONTHLY MESSEr 96.00 96.00 03/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#0211 119.00 119.00 04/08/2003 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS 43.72 43.72 01/27/2002 PS-VEHICLE TOWING SERVI 987.69 987.69 04/02/2003 PWS-LOCKSMITH SERVICES 26.14 04/02/2003 PKRCS-LOCKSMITH SERVIC 4,097.12 4,123.26 03/26/2003 CDB-REFUND ELEC PERMIT 69.60 69.60 11/05/2002 PS-FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAl 196.56 01/27/2003 PS-FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAl 50.04 246.60 03/25/2003 PS-CRITICAL INCIDENT RES 649.00 649.00 02/20/2003 PKM-COMMERCIAL MOWER 3,862.40 3,862.40 Page: 1 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 2 Bank: key us bank (Continued) ~ Date Vendor Invoice 172241 04/15/2003000475 ALARM CENTERS/CUSTOM S 272914 Voucher: 172241 272915 272978 272882 272913 17224204/15/2003005287 AMERICALL COMMUNICATIO D6416 Voucher: 172242 D6417 17224304/15/2003001194 AMERICAN HOSE & FITTINGS597740-001 Voucher: 172243 17224404/15/2003005027 AMERICAN MUSIC Voucher: 172244 17224504/15/2003003129 AMS LASER SUPPLY Voucher: 172245 :}1 172246 04/15/2003 005079 ANDERSON, SHELLY Voucher: 172246 r.J 17224704/15/2003005501 ANDREWS, AMY Voucher: 172247 509590 338810 PS 3/25/03 CA#26965 CA#28407 CA#28085 CA#28087 17224804/15/2003000190 APA-AMERICAN PLANNING A 091465 Voucher: 172248 091464 092187 082347 17224904/15/2003000355 APA-ZONING NEWS Voucher: 172249 17225004/15/2003005715 ARCH WIRELESS HOLDINGS M6163838D Voucher: 172250 17225104/15/2003007337 ASADI, RAY Voucher: 172251 17225204/15/2003001233 AT&T BUSINESS SERVICE Voucher: 172252 117849 051071461201 051066149401 051069153801 050532095501 051064514901 058494854901 Inv Date DescriDtion 03/20/2003 PKCP-ALRM MNTR APR-JUN 03/20/2003 PKCP-ALRM MNTR APR-JUN 03/20/2003 PKCHB-ALRM MNTR SVC AP 03/20/2003 PKRCS-ALRM MNTR SVC AP 03/20/2003 PKKFT-ALRM MNTR SVC AP 04/01/2003 SWM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 04/01/2003 PKM-AFTER HR CALL-OUT S 02/25/2003 PKM-BOBCAT ATTACHMENT 03/28/2003 PKKFT-MUSIC EQP/REPAIRS 03/21/2003 MSDP-PRINTER TONER- 03/25/2003 PS-REIMBPATROL PANTS A 04/01/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2696 03/18/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2840 03/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 2808 03/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2808 02/21/2003 CDPL - APA RENEWAL - LOR 02/21/2003 CDPL - APA RENEWAL - MA 02/21/2003 CDPL - APA RENEWAL - GRE 02/25/2003 CDA - ANNUAL 2003-2004 AP 04/02/2003 MSTEL-PAGER LEASE APRIL 03/27/2003 PKRCS-REFUND RENTAL 03/24/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 03/28/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 03/15/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 03/25/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 03/15/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV 03/13/2003 MSTEL-LONG DISTANCE SV Amount Paid 120.00 120.00 103.00 59.74 60.00 114.60 83.90 60.49 587.48 381.78 60.00 40.00 40.00 80.00 100.00 309.00 342.00 210.00 65.00 1,047.20 70.00 29.44 23.97 21.27 23.97 22.31 21.27 Check Total 462.74 198.50 60.49 587.48 381.78 60.00 260.00 861.00 65.00 1,047.20 70.00 142.23 Page: 2 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 3 Bank: key us bank (Conlinued) 17225304/15/2003 000004 AWC-ASSOC OF WASHINGT 5536 03/28/2003 PS-AWC 2003 LABOR RELAT Voucher: 172253 AWC STANLEY 04/03/2003 MSHR-03 AWC LABOR REL AWC MCDOUG 04/03/2003 MSHR-03 AWC LABOR REL 17225404/15/2003002386 BANHEGYI/ PAWLAK. SUSANIA#65343 04/14/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:IA#65343' Voucher: 172254 CA#25943 03/13/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2594 17225504/15/2003005421 BARGER. KENNETH CA#25174 03/10/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2517 Voucher: 172255 17225604/15/2003000792 BARRY'S TRUCKING & LAND 8527 Voucher: 172256 8529 8528 8560 8531 1) 17225704/15/2003700349 BAYVIEW COUNTRY ESTATE C2401R13425 \H Voucher: 172257 ~ 172258 04/15/2003 007327 BBC DODGE INC Voucher: 172258 17225904/15/2003007159 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR Voucher: 172259 17226004/15/2003005645 BERTUCCI, MICHAEL Voucher: 172260 172261 04/15/2003007336 BETHEL LUTHERAN CHURCHC2046R13427 Voucher: 172261 C2046R13426 17226204/15/2003005098 BIG 0 TIRES 4 LESS & AUTO ~258110 Voucher: 172262 258349 258594 259016 258599 259029 258420 Check # Date Vendor Invoice ST3-079 0028753 624109 Inv Date Description Amount Paid 150.00 125.00 125.00 35.00 52.50 45.00 1,904.00 272.00 2,029.12 228.48 217.60 150.00 31,815.16 5,641.56 120.00 519.51 150.00 16.81 335.40 16.81 13.55 16.81 16.81 14.02 Check Total 400.00 87.50 45.00 4,651.20 150.00 31,815.16 5,64156 120.00 669.51 430.21 03/27/2003 AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND 03/31/2003 AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND 03/27/2003 AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND 03/31/2003 AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND 03/31/2003 AG02-79:LANDSCAPING AND 04/02/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 03/26/2003 PS-NEW VEHICLE: 2 DODGE 02/25/2003 AG03-13 QUADRANT BLDG I 03/01/2003 PS-REIMB:RANGE MEMBERS 04/03/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 04/03/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 03/04/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SVC 03/10/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS/SVC 03/19/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SVC 03/31/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SVC 03/19/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SVC 03/31/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SVC 03/12/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS/SVC Page: 3 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 4 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) jj \,¡\ -L Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17226404/15/2003001630 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO 1289521 Voucher: 172264 281981-03 287249-01 284121-01 290167 292996 285839-80CR 282360-81 290215 286678 289228-02 289219-02 289209-02 287496-80 288863-02 288859-02 291301 285485 284180 293197 291411 290302 289218 293556 289209 289238 291302 289219 276691-02 284674 290479 291300 289209-01 290952 289219-01 Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total 02/28/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 11.97 03/19/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 12.24 03/03/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 20.67 03/26/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 21.54 03/24/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 2421 03/24/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 28.23 03/12/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES -34.76 03/05/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 40.80 03/12/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 3.26 03/19/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 5.39 03/26/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 5.39 03/26/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 5.39 03/26/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 5.39 03/24/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 6.53 03/17/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 65.23 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 65.23 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 91.88 03/12/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 93.02 03/12/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 99.99 03/26/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 99.99 03/13/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 100.00 03/06/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 100.00 03/01/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 10000 03/27/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 100.00 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 141.60 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 147.10 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 170.16 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 193.88 03/12/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 218.25 03/24/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 231.58 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 243.49 03/17/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 260.47 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 1,202.73 03/19/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 1,165.74 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 1,121.56 Page: 4 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 5 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice \) ~ 289228-01 289238-01 290298 287253 288860 288863 289961 283103 288859 288895 293310 290435 289238-02 284683-01 289228 290217 290952-01 211503 199532 253002 200217 218346 166810 163050 005406 005317 005342 005347 005297 97721 17226504/15/2003000007 BOISE OFFICE SOLUTIONS Voucher: 172265 17226604/15/2003004315 BRENT'S ALIGNMENT & REP Voucher: 172266 17226704/15/2003002093 BROWN & BROWN OF WA, I Voucher: 172267 172268 04/15/2003 005801 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET. OL 1091 Voucher: 172268 1090 172269 04/15/2003 007338 CABRERA. DENISE 117850 Voucher: 172269 Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid 1.065.32 922.68 848.31 707.20 441.18 432.92 429.54 422.80 405.17 405.17 358.55 348.05 296.97 275.64 275.32 3.26 10.34 48.99 50.53 6.23 70.22 4.15 143.53 154.85 733.07 316.38 154.32 135.13 34.84 175.00 14,458.10 14,458.10 10.00 Check Total 13,816.57 478.50 1,373.74 175.00 28,916.20 10.00 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/06/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/24/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/24/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 03/18/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/27/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 03/19/2003 PS- UNIFORM & ACCES. 03/26/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 03/12/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/07/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/12/2003 PS- UNIFORMS & ACCES 03/26/2003 PS-UNIFORM & ACCES. 03/06/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/06/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/10/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/06/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/06/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/04/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/04/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 04/07/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/21/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/26/2003 MSFL T -REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/26/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT SVCS 03/17/2003 MSFLT-REPAIR/MAINTSVCS 01/23/2003 INSURANCE PREMIUMS GL/ 03/19/2003 PS-NEW VEHICLE:2003 CHE\ 03/19/2003 PS-NEW VEHICLE:2003 CHE\ 03/27/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C Page: 5 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 6 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17227004/15/2003000414 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING IN 6698 Voucher: 172270 6683 6633 6684CR 6655 6648 6651 6649 6631 6671 6653 6630 6685 6672 6700 6656 6650 6694 6699 6654 6645 6652 6646 6647 IB56535 \1 \,}.\ 'Ç' 172271 04/15/2003 005573 CDW GOVERNMENT INC Voucher: 172271 17227204/15/2003002341 CENTRAL PUGET SOUND 2003-1 Voucher: 172272 17227304/15/2003005712 CHANG. JENNY CA#27088 Voucher: 172273 CA#28101 17227404/15/2003 005657 CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECO ABOOO0671310 Voucher: 172274 Inv Date Description 04/08/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 02/28/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 03/18/2003 DBC-CATERING SVCS 02/28/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 03/18/2003 DBC-CATERING SVCS 03/28/2003 DBC-CATERING SVCS 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 03/18/2003 DBC-CATERING SVCS 02/28/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 03/28/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/08/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/07/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/08/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 04/01/2003 DBC - CATERING SVC 03/24/2003 MSDP/RR TOSHIBA TABLET 03/21/2003 MSA- CENTRAL PGT SND R 03/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA#2708 03/18/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA#2810 03/31/2003 PS-AUTOTRACKXP MARCH 2 Amount Paid 101.52 21.25 15.30 -973.76 833.00 1,142.60 1,717.92 1,90068 128.73 134.40 150.48 217.60 227.76 234.98 287.00 294.24 294.24 169.20 299.20 367.20 407.04 441.36 543.68 711.60 231.99 163.20 70.00 35.00 93.00 Check Total 9,667.22 231.99 163.20 105.00 93.00 Page 6 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 7 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17227504/15/2003000142 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE CK# 2012 Voucher: 172275 CK# 2007 CK#2010 CK# 2019 24597 17227604/15/2003003551 CITY OF KENT Voucher: 172276 172277 04/15/2003 004412 CITY OF TACOMNSURPLUS ~018-03 Voucher: 172277 17227804/15/2003006380 CITY OF VANCOUVER PIT 4/: Voucher: 172278 17227904/15/2003002640 CLASS SOFTWARE SOLUTIO 15845 ì1 Voucher: 172279 ~ 17228004/15/2003 007347 CLEMENT. ELIZABETH 02-01- ..J Voucher: 172280 17228104/15/2003003752 COASTWIDE SUPPLY DBA T1190635 Voucher: 172281 T1187027 17228204/15/2003 007317 COMCAST OF WASHINGTON 01-47417 Voucher: 172282 APRIL 2003 17228304/15/2003007323 COMMERCIAL NETLEASE RE 02-01-210318 Voucher: 172283 17228404/15/2003005300 COMPAQ CORPORATION Voucher: 172284 PIT 4/25/03 02-01-091314 33640163 33613603 33619763 17228504/15/2003004395 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICA 0220-419755 Voucher: 172285 0220-419404 0220-419980 0220-419978 3/27/2003 17228604/15/2003000135 CORDI & BEJARANO INC PS Voucher: 172286 17228704/15/2003000721 CORLISS RESOURCES INC 0018383 Voucher: 172287 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/27/2003 CD-TRAVEL EXP:APA CONF 160.00 03/13/2003 PS-TRAVEL EXP:INSTRUCTO 519.35 03/20/2003 PS-TRAVEL EXP:SFST&DRU 469.60 04/11/2003 PS-TRAVEL EXP:BACKGROU 97.00 1,245.95 04/03/2003 PS-EVOC TRAINING 3/27103- 59.59 59.59 02/28/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS 2/1- 2 847.70 847.70 04/04/2003 PS-POLICE SERVICES TRNG 175.00 175.00 03/20/2003 MSDP/PK-ESCOM SYS CONV 3,500.00 3,500.00 04/01/2003 LOSS DATE 12/6/01,CAR DOC 817.74 817.74 03/25/2003 PKCHB-JANITORIAL SUPPLI 183.77 03/14/2003 PKRLS-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 88.13 271.90 04/07/2003 PW-REFUND DUPLICATE P 191.50 03/27/2003 MSGAC - COMMERCIAL DMX 81.59 273.09 04/02/2003 LOSS DATE JULY-NOV/02 CL 1,100.00 1,100.00 03/19/2003 MSDP-PS COPS MORE 2001. 236.10 03/13/2003 MSDP-PS COPS MORE 2001, 2,841.86 03/14/2003 MSDP-PS COPS MORE 2001, 437.38 3,515.34 03/18/2003 PKCHB/FLOURESCENT BUL 129.91 03/18/2003 PKCHB/FLOURESCENT BUL 129.91 03/26/2003 PKMCHB-LlGHTING SUPPLI 65.82 03/26/2003 PKMCHB-LlGHTING SUPPLI 14.75 340.39 03/27/2003 MC-PRO TERM JUDGE 3/27 125.00 12500 03/14/2003 PWS-5/8 CRUSHED ROCK- 47.58 47.58 Page: 7 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 8 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17228804/15/2003000063 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF Voucher 172288 \'\ vJ d' Invoice 41481726 41326349 40986732CR 41924399CR 41662538CR 40814089 41746929 40970570 41823257 41554438 41780519CR 41861717 41023546CR 41861721 41932430 41096634 41003014 41932431 41642772 419324449 41675081 41932432 41642777 41223671 41746907 41610194 41932444 41932429 40741327 40666458 41431554 41290960 41932427 41823233 41117293 Inv Date Description 03/12/2003 MC- OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/06/2003 MC- OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/25/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 CDM -OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/19/2003 PKADM - OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/18/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/21/2003 PK-FAC/OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 02/24/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/25/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/14/2003 PKADM - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/24/2003 PKADM - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/26/2003 MC- OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/26/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/26/2003 COM -OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 MSMD-CHB PAPER SUPPLY 02/28/2003 MC- OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/25/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 MSMD-CHB PAPER SUPPLY 03/18/2003 PKAOM - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 MSHR-OFFICE SUPPLIES/E 03/19/2003 PS-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 MSMD-CHB PAPER SUPPLY 03/18/2003 CDM -OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/03/2003 MC- OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/21/2003 PKADM - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/17/2003 PKRCS-OFFICE SUPPLIESIE 03/28/2003 CDM -OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 MSMD-CHB PAPER SUPPLY 02/14/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/12/2003 MC- OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/11/2003 MC- OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 MSMD-PS: PAPER SUPPLIES 03/25/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES 02/28/2003 CD/HS - OFFICE SUPPLIES Amount Paid 1444 7.62 -12.14 -14.74 -16.00 258.77 169.37 166.74 135.31 132.76 -20.02 125.53 -103.01 105.70 103.90 101.73 8843 87.37 80.84 76.96 76.79 76.70 71.35 68.54 66.61 58.05 56.17 51.14 40.58 39.48 35.58 33.10 27.21 19.80 17.88 Check Total 2,228.54 Page: 8 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 9 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17228904/15/2003000771 COSTCO/HRS USA Voucher: 172289 Invoice 06547500 06227800 04272300 06078700 06998400 06204100 01198000 06646700 20003268 17229004/15/2003003258 COUNTERASSAULT Voucher: 172290 172291 04/15/2003007025 COZEN O'CONNOR Voucher: 172291 17229204/15/2003003536 CREATIVE OFFICE FURNISH 03-60931 Voucher: 172292 ~ 172293 04/15/2003 000854 D J TROPHY "-'> Voucher: 172293 354893 00210313 00210599 00210530 17229404/15/2003000168 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMER3139567 Voucher: 172294 3138185 3137955 3138184 3139568 3138443 17229504/15/2003 005739 DCL-POLICE TRAINING SYST PS 1/27/03 Voucher: 172295 17229604/15/2003000438 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE J 9677 Voucher 172296 17229704/15/2003 007335 DELLOSA & DElLOSA Voucher: 172297 17229804/15/2003701001 DIOCESE OF OLYMPIA Voucher: 172298 17229904/15/2003005619 DMCMA Voucher: 172299 03-101137-00 C2205R 13428 Inv Date Description 03/05/2003 PS- OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2003 PS- PATROL & DET. SUPPLIE 03/18/2003 PRCS-REC IN HORTICUL TUR 02/28/2003 PRCS-YOUTH COMMISSION I 03/14/2003 PKKFT- SUPPLIES 03/20/2003 PS- 98 PRINT SHOP 03/21/2003 CD- BATTERIES 03/20/2003 CM- CITY/KOREAN COMMUN 03/21/2003 PS-POLICE FIREARMS EQUI 03/20/2003 AG02-114: LEGAL SERVICES 04/09/2003 PS-OFFICE FURNITURE & E 03/03/2003 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES H 04/03/2003 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES V 03/25/2003 PS-ENGRAVING SERVICES U 03/26/2003 PWS-NEWSPAPER LEGAL N 02/15/2003 PKM-CONCESSIONAIRE LE 02/08/2003 PWS-PUBLICATION - 02/01 & 02/15/2003 PKM-CONCESSIONAIRE LE 03/26/2003 MSF-NEWSPAPER LEGAL N 02/24/2003 PW-SWMM-RFP-AQUATIC P 01/27/2003 PS-POLICE TRAINING JOHN I 03/21/2003 PWA-LUNCHX4-ADMIN IIN 03/28/2003 CDB-PLAN CHECK FEE 04/03/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 2003 DUES 04/01/2003 MC-MEMBERSHIP DUES 200 WOODROW 03 04/01/2003 MC-MEMBER DUES BONNIE' Amount Paid 27143 22845 98.31 65.00 40.69 2.57312 32.86 21.52 237.95 19247 76149 208.32 178.32 17746 36040 129.20 666.40 129.20 95.20 96.20 195.00 36.51 105.74 64.82 75.00 100.00 Check Total 3,331.38 237.95 192.47 76149 564.10 1,476.60 195.00 36.51 105.74 64.82 175.00 Page: 9 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 10 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17230004/15/2003005341 DODD, ESCOLASTICA ROSA CA#25041 Voucher: 172300 CA#27078 CA#26813 CA#27059 CA#28676 CA#28676 02-47158 172301 04/15/2003007350 DONOVAN BROTHERS INC Voucher: 172301 17230204/15/2003007277 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 34133 Voucher: 172302 17230304/15/2003005048 DUPONT FLOORING SYSTE 4153-052 Voucher: 172303 1 Q Inv Date DescriDtion 03/31/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA#2504 04/01/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA#2707 03/21/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 2681 03/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA#2705 03/12/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA#2867 03/18/2003 MC-INTERPRETERCA# 2867 04/08/2003 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS 03/10/2003 PS-AMMUNITION:FIREARMS' 03/20/2003 PKDBC/KFT-CARPET CLEAN Amount Paid 80.00 180.00 80.00 300.00 80.00 120.00 874.00 233.50 775.00 Check Total 840.00 874.00 233.50 775.00 Page: 10 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 11 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 1 17230504/15/2003000570 EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE 11025143 Voucher: 172305 1025142 1025169 1025523 1025769 1025700 1024806 1025557 1025622 1025444 1025269 1025307 1025040 1025451 1025430 1025634 1025421 1025447 1025493 1025531 1025114 1025492CR 1025095 1025693 1025129 1025128 1025771 1025755 1025747 1025411 1025746 1025072 1025518 1025123 1025311 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/07/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 54.38 03/07/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS 60.34 03/07/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS 73.00 03/24/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 83.86 04/04/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 91.25 04/01/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 91.49 02/20/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 99.87 03/25/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 175.94 03/28/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 177.53 03/19/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 199.32 03/12/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 229.41 03/13/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 289.12 03/03/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 29202 03/20/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 303.68 03/19/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 309.47 03/28/2003 PS-REPAIR SERVICES/MAIN 314.22 03/19/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS 326.84 03/20/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 334.77 03/22/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 359.21 03/24/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 386.46 03/05/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 531.74 03/22/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS -303.68 03/05/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 11.09 03/31/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 13.32 03/06/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 13.32 03/06/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 13.32 04/04/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 18.49 04/03/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 18.49 04/03/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS 18.49 03/18/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS 823.19 04/03/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS 18.49 03/04/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 73.00 03/24/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 18.49 03/06/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 18.49 03/13/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRS 23.86 Page: 11 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 12 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 1025063 1025640 1025431 1025703 471 17230604/15/2003007299 EARTHCORPS Voucher: 172306 17230704/15/2003005639 ELLINGTON. THOMAS MARK 3/28/2003 Voucher: 172307 3/17/2003 17230804/15/2003005598 ELLIOTT SALES CORPORATlCO84635 Voucher: 172308 17230904/15/2003002867 ENCHANTED PARKS INC 02-4797, Voucher: 172309 ""ò 17231004/15/2003006514 ENGINEERING BUSINESS SY 15130 ...Ç. Voucher: 172310 15192 N 15129 \ 17231104/15/2003004585 ENGINEERING DYNAMICS 17469 Voucher: 172311 17231204/15/2003001046 EOUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATI6546940 Voucher: 172312 6546941 17231304/15/2003000328 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 0125949 Voucher: 172313 725934 0125948 0124804 17231404/15/2003004840 EVAC-EMERGENCY VEHICLE 101929 Voucher: 172314 101930 101934 101977 101971 101956 101935 101906 101907 101903 101873 02-47977 Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid 34.78 44.39 44.39 54.38 2,228.26 350.00 175.00 336.37 17,857.50 854.08 258.66 502.82 1,195.00 21.07 21.76 6,289.64 2.82 2,342.19 1,92786 65.28 65.28 63.10 71.05 58.75 108.80 32.64 179.03 104.67 80.68 65.28 Check Total 5,740.22 2,228.26 525.00 33637 17,857.50 1,615.56 1,195.00 42.83 10,562.51 894.56 03/04/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 03/29/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 03/19/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 04/01/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRS 03/27/2003 PKMT/LANDSCAPE SERVICE 03/28/2003 MC-PRO TERM JUDGE 3128 03/17/2003 MC-PRO TERM JUDGE 3/17 03/20/2003 PKDBC/KFT-PROMOTIONAL f 04/07/2003 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS 03/31/2003 MIS/ALL-POWERSCRIPT 3 PF 04/02/2003 MSDP-SERVICE & MAINTEN 03/31/2003 MSDP-36 INCH ROLL OF DO 03/25/2003 PS-COMPUTER SOFTWAREI 03/25/2003 PS-CREDIT REPORTS (MAR/ 03/25/2003 PS-CREDIT REPORTS (MARl 03/31/2003 PS-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 3/1 03/27/2003 MSFL T-OIL FOR VEHICLES- 03/31/2003 MSFL T-FUEL FOR VEHICLES 03/15/2003 MSFL T -FUEL FOR VEHICLES 03/18/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRIINSTALLA 03/18/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRIINSTALLA 03/18/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIRIINSTALLA 04/02/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIR/INSTALLA 03/31/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIR/INSTALLA 03/24/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRIINSTALLA 03/18/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIR/INSTALLA 03/11/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRIINSTALLA 03/11/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIR/INSTALLA 03/11/2003 PS-AUTO REPAIRIINSTALLA 02/28/2003 PS- AUTO REPAIR/INSTALLA Page: 12 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 13 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17231504/15/2003001131 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTR 004775 Voucher: 172315 004774 004779 004758 17231604/15/2003001297 FACILITY MAINTENANCE CO 138-003 Voucher: 172316 17231704/15/2003003130 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAP1PS 4/25/03 Voucher: 172317 17231804/15/2003000217 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPOR4-606-11346 Voucher: 172318 4-654-16830 4-654-98789 --rì 17231904/15/2003003121 FEDERAL WAY DISCOUNT G 3/19/03 :5 Voucher: 172319 17232004/15/2003000285 FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPART 03-0014 Voucher: 172320 172321 04/15/2003004270 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR Voucher: 172321 004587 004643 004634 004616 004655 004640 004605 004588 004642 004572 004641 004633 004632 004604 004555 004571 004649 17232204/15/2003004690 FEDERAL WAY NUTRITION S 0403FWPD303 Voucher: 172322 Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid 80.55 80.55 39.93 147.65 452.62 70.00 50.00 8.75 12.10 1,198.80 250.00 76.36 73.04 73.04 66.40 59.76 59.76 53.12 119.52 46.48 119.52 46.48 46.48 46.48 76.36 23904 239.04 132.80 183.00 Check Total 348.68 452.62 70.00 70.85 1,198.80 250.00 1,573.68 183.00 03/17/2003 MSFL T - AUTO REPAIR/SERV 03/17/2003 MSFL T - AUTO REPAIR/SERV 0311712003 MSFL T - AUTO REPAIR/SERV 03/13/2003 MSFLT - AUTO REPAIR/SERV 03/15/2003 AG01-52DBC LANDSCAPE S 04/01/2003 PS-FBINAA POLICE CONF K 02/1712003 PRCS- DELV SERVICE 03/21/2003 CDL - OVERNIGHT DOCS TO 04/04/2003 CM-DELIVERY SERVICE 03/19/2003 PS-POLICE DEPT FIREARMS/ 03/31/2003 PKDBC:REMIT FIRE DEPT F 02/15/2003 PW-SWMM-RFP-AQUATIC P 03/12/2003 PKMT/RFB TRACTOR;- 03/12/2003 PKMT/RFB TRACTOR;- 02/26/2003 PW-SWMM-RFP-AQUATIC P 03/19/2003 MSHR-NEWSPAPER ADS FL 03/12/2003 MSHR-NEWSPAPER ADS FL 02/22/2003 MSC-ORDINANCE ADVERTIS 02/15/2003 PKPL/NEWSPAPER ADS;- 03/12/2003 PKM-LEGAL NOTICE/CONCE 02/08/2003 PKPLINEWSPAPER ADS;- 03/12/2003 PKM-LEGAL NOTICE/CONCE 03/05/2003 PKM-LEGAL NOTICE/CONCE 03/05/2003 PKM-LEGAL NOTICE/CONCE 02/22/2003 PW-SWMM-RFP-AQUATIC P 02/01/2003 PWS-PUBLICATION 02/01 - 2 02/08/2003 PWS-PUBLICA TION 02/01 - 2 03/15/2003 PWS-PUBLICATION 03/15 - R 03/31/2003 PS-LUNCH:OFFICER PATRO Page: 13 apChklst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check list CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 14 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17232304/15/2003001893 FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIS Voucher: 172323 17232404/15/2003005213 FIFE PRINTING Voucher: 172324 172325 04/15/2003 004910 FILETEX LLC Voucher: 172325 Invoice Iny Date DescriDtion SIF-MAR 2003 04/11/2003 MSF-REMIT IMPACT FEES F 15170 03-966 03-994 02-950 03-970 03-979 6506471 17232604/15/2003 002962 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Voucher: 172326 -t\ 17232704/15/2003007340 FISHER, CHRISTINA ...ç Voucher: 172327 '"'- 17232804/15/2003007301 FORENSIC SCIENCE ASSOC 6142 Voucher: 172328 17232904/15/2003007341 FRANCES, DIANE Voucher: 172329 172330 04/15/2003 006803 FULLER, CHRISTY Voucher: 172330 172331 04/15/2003 004566 G&M HONEST PERFORMANC49308 Voucher: 172331 17233204/15/2003003118 GALLS INC 56310 Voucher: 172332 17233304/15/2003700929 GATEWAY CENTER HOTEL L 02-35928 Voucher: 172333 17233404/15/2003004578 GENE'S TOWING INC 240331 Voucher: 172334 17233504/15/2003001478 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYS 149728 Voucher 172335 17233604/15/2003007062 GONCHAROVA TRANSLATI 3/30/03 Voucher: 172336 17233704/15/2003001992 GOSNEY MOTOR PARTS 12576C Voucher: 172337 17233804/15/2003003831 GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES 03-006 Voucher: 172338 03-41866 03-41892 117848 563109040 240331 125760 03/08/2003 MC-PRINTING SERVICES CR 01/31/2003 CDA - COLORCODED LASERI 03/03/2003 CDA - COLORCODED LASERI 01/15/2003 CDA - COLOR CODED LASERI 02/04/2003 CDA - COLORCODED LASERI 02/18/2003 CDA - COLORCODED LASERI 03/24/2003 PS-CRIME SCENE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 12/12/2002 PS-LAB ANAL YSISDNA EVID 03/28/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 03/27/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 03/19/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 03/06/2003 PS-POLICE CLOTHING/EQUIF 04/04/2003 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS 03/09/2003 PS-TOWING SERVICES- 03/10/2003 PWS-ENGINEERS HI-VIS TA 03/30/2003 PWSWR-RUSSIAN FLYER F 04/02/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 03/31/2003 PS-POL YGRAPH EXAMS JOH Amount Paid 13,916.00 144.16 45.27 120.29 35.77 29.51 42.04 156.39 75.00 7,165.00 75.00 15.50 37.28 679.85 4,584.00 122.94 17.10 27.00 369.88 250.00 Check Total 13,916.00 144.16 272.88 156.39 75.00 7,165.00 75.00 15.50 37.28 679.85 4,584.00 122.94 17.10 27.00 369.88 250.00 Page: 14 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 15 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid 17233904/15/2003000671 H 0 FOWLER COMPANY 11270941 03/25/2003 PKM-GD REPAIR/MAINT SUP 162.26 Voucher: 172339 17234004/15/2003007339 HARP, STEPHEN 117847 03/27/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 6.00 Voucher: 172340 172341 04/15/2003 003841 HEAD-QUARTERS PTS 6779 04/01/2003 AG01-109: PKM SANITATION 382.50 Voucher: 172341 172342 04/15/2003 002477 HOME DEPOT 2030660 03/26/2003 PS-REPAIR/MAINTENANCE S 21.41 Voucher: 172342 6022363 03/12/2003 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 48.20 5032301 03/03/2003 PKDBC-REPAIR/MAINTENAN 67.43 4031421 03/14/2003 SWM-REPAIR/MAINTENANC 130.12 7030937 03/11/2003 PKDBC-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 199.10 1 5010367 03/13/2003 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 10.84 4032451 03/04/2003 PKMF-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 221.95 VI 5202287 03/13/2003 MIS-REPAIR/MAINTENANCE ~ 16.77 17234304/15/2003007109 HUGHES, HARRY CA#22308 03/17/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2230 112.50 Voucher: 172343 17234404/15/2003003256 HURLEY ENGINEERING COM 413346 S 03/11/2003 PKDBC-SERVICE BOILER- 120.23 Voucher. 172344 4133615 04/10/2003 PKMT/REPAIR BOILER;- 260.14 17234504/15/2003001431 ICON MATERIALS INC 195645 03/25/2003 PWS-ASPHALT OVERLAY P 157.65 Voucher: 172345 172346 04/15/2003 007300 INIA SUICIDEBYCO 03/04/2003 PS-SUICIDE BY COpy SEMIN 150.00 Voucher: 172346 17234704/15/2003005231 10S CAPITAL INC 58400750 03/28/2003 MSMD-COPIER RENTAL 4/ 2,535.76 Voucher: 172347 172348 04/15/2003 003211 IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE I F577438 03/31/2003 MSC-RECORDS STORAGE S 898.34 Voucher: 172348 17234904/15/2003007342 JACKSON, DAVID G 03-41938 03/28/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 Voucher: 172349 17235004/15/2003 007343 JAMES. PEGGE M 03-41940 03/28/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 75.00 Voucher: 172350 172351 04/15/2003004096 JOHNSON CHRISTIE ANDRE 6936 RLC 03/13/2003 AGOO-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS 3 2,364.00 Voucher: 172351 6903 RLC 03/13/2003 AGOO-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS 3 808.00 6902 RLC 03/13/2003 AGOO-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS 3 2,091.50 6935 RLC 03/13/2003 AGOQ-60B:PS LEGAL SVCS 3 1,495.50 Check Total 162.26 6.00 382.50 715.82 112.50 380.37 157.65 150.00 2,535.76 898.34 7500 7500 6,759.00 Page: 15 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 16 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17235204/15/2003007157 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATI0013314 Voucher: 172352 172353 04/15/2003 002933 JORGENSEN, RONALD THOR SEP-DEC 2002 Voucher: 172353 JAN-MAR 2003 17235404/15/2003005934 K P TRANSLATION SERVICE CA#24326 Voucher: 172354 17235504/15/2003002679 KANG, SAI C Voucher: 172355 17235604/15/2003005956 KING COUNTY AUDITOR Voucher: 172356 17235704/15/2003005568 KING COUNTY FLEET ADM DI201566 Voucher: 172357 !j 17235804/15/2003 007332 KING COUNTY PARKS DIVIS 2ND PAYMENT 04/11/2003 PKADMIINTERLOCAL POOL; ( J: Voucher: 172358 (" 17235904/15/2003003898 KING COUNTY RADIO Voucher: 172359 Jnv Date Description Amount Paid 3,817.08 938.40 902.40 80.00 87.50 19.00 1,336.10 34,630.50 4,370.00 443.00 14,223.40 398.50 80.29 220.96 115.00 89.00 Check Total 3,817.08 1,840.80 80.00 87.50 19.00 1,336.10 34,630.50 19,940.15 02/10/2003 AG02-136:POTENTIAL ANNEX 03/20/2003 PRCS-TAI CHI SEPT-DEC. 2 03/20/2003 PRCS-JAN-MAR 2003 TAl CHI 03/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2432 CA#22449 01/23/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2244 8548 03/14/2003 PS-NEEDS ADDITIONAL REC 03/13/2003 PW-SWR-MATERIALS/SUPP 302264 37980 302239 37981 38046 38000 38042 38133 03/31/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 03/28/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES 03/27/2003 MSDP/PS-5 PORT RADIOS - fJ 03/28/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 03/28/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 03/28/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 03/28/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - 03/28/2003 MSTEL-RADIO SERVICES - Page: 16 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 17 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid 17236004/15/2003000201 KINKO'S lNG, ACCOUNT #020515100065548 10/29/2002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 20155 Voucher: 172360 515100067534 03/10/2003 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS RWE 199.92 515100067878 04/02/2003 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 194.75 515100067853 04/01/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 663.63 515100067664 03/19/2003 PKRCS-PRINT'G SVCS ART C 194.75 515100067800 03/27/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 4.31 515100065666 11/06/2002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 114.45 515100067656 03/18/2003 CDA-PRINTING SERVICES 97.92 515100067804 03/27/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 82.14 515100067877 04/02/2003 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS 50.05 515100067896 04/03/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 45.97 ':2 515100067734 03/24/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 30.74 515100067749 03/25/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES 30.46 -J 515100066217 12/14/2002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 29.83 515100067642 03/17/2003 PWTR-PRINTING SERVICES 6.53 515100065357 10/17/2002 PKRCS-PRINTING SVCS- 5.83 172361 04/15/2003 000201 KINKO'S INC. ACCOUNT #020515100067818 03/28/2003 PW/DS-PRINTING SERVICES 54.40 Voucher: 172361 515100067785 03/26/2003 PW/AD-PRINTING SERVICES 21.76 172362 04/15/2003 006420 KIPP BROTHERS 612477 03/15/2003 PRCS-RWBF GENERAL STO 169.30 Voucher: 172362 172363 04/15/2003 007249 KNOLL INC 1376000 03/22/2003 PKM-OFFICE FURNISHINGSI 1,576.21 Voucher: 172363 172364 04/15/2003 004298 KOSOFF-ROACH, MELANIE E FEB-MAR/03 04/03/2003 PKRCS-GYMNASTIC INSTRU 1,495.73 Voucher: 172364 172365 04/15/2003 007298 KUNTZ, ARTHUR J 75 03/17/2003 MSDP-PROFESSIONAL SER 3,500.00 Voucher: 172365 17236604/15/2003001456 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC 154961 03/24/2003 PS-POLICE EQUIPMENT MAl 140.00 Voucher: 172366 17236704/15/2003003399 KVASNYUK. NIKOLAY CA#26198 03/11/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2619 290.00 Voucher: 172367 CA#28777 03/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2877 150.00 17236804/15/2003007334 KWON, SUN AE 01-46255 03/28/2003 MSF-REFUND BUSINESS LI 50.00 Voucher: 172368 Check Total 1,952.83 76.16 169.30 1,576.21 1,495.73 3,500.00 140.00 440.00 50.00 Page: 17 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 18 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) 17237004/15/2003000276 LANIER WORLDWIDE INC Voucher: 172370 172371 04/15/2003 004052 LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIP Voucher: 172371 17237204/15/2003007050 LAW OFFICES OF HAL GEIE -n Voucher: 172372 ....Ç. 172373 04/15/2003 005478 LEBEL, SHELLEY (5j Voucher: 172373 17237404/15/2003003157 LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF '238003 Voucher: 172374 237037 237391 237709 237878 CA#26835 Check # Date Vendor 17236904/15/2003000096 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRI Voucher: 172369 17237504/15/2003004594 LlM, VANNARA S Voucher: 172375 17237604/15/2003000630 LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC Voucher: 172376 Invoice 2592802 1014202 2781401 3059601 2781501 2906301 0090099855 0090104342 03290311 03290312 7B 1006703 64323 64325 64324 Inv Date Descriotion Amount Paid 14.48 75.93 14.48 14.48 14.48 14.48 442.82 442.82 248.23 164.89 2.820.00 96.60 323.14 90.79 28.83 66.64 32.64 90.00 783.36 20.02 535.89 Check Total 148.33 885.64 413.12 2,820.00 96.60 542.04 90.00 1,339.27 03/27/2003 PKM - UTILITIES 03/27/2003 PKM - UTILITIES 03/19/2003 PKM - UTILITIES 03/24/2003 PKM - UTILITIES 03/27/2003 PKM - UTILITIES 03/27/2003 PKM - UTILITIES 01/17/2003 MC-ADVOCATE V RECORDE 02/05/2003 MC-ADVOCATE V RECORDE 03/29/2003 PS-SAFETY EQUIPMENT 03/29/2003 PS-SAFETV EQUIPMENT 01/24/2003 AG02-125:PUBLIC DEFENDE 03/14/2003 PRCS-RWBF NOVEL TV ITE 03/21/2003 MSFL T- REPAIRI SERVICE 03/05/2003 MSFLT- REPAIR/ SERVICE 03/11/2003 MSFLT- REPAIR/ SERVICE 03/17/2003 MSFLT- REPAIRI SERVICE 03/19/2003 MSFL T- REPAIR/ SERVICE 03/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2683 03/20/2003 PKM-STONE/GRAVEL SUPPL 03/19/2003 PWS-MEDIUM BARK DUMP C 03/21/2003 PWS-DUMP CONCRETE Page: 18 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 19 (Continued) Bank: kev us bank Check # Date Vendor 172377 04/15/2003 005339 LOWE'S HIW INC Voucher: 172377 Invoice 002405886205 00240628641 002407186816 002406686579 002406386451 002407186840 002406486487 002407186814 002408387304 002406586536 002406586551 002407186813 1'1 17237804/15/2003000874 MACHINERY COMPONENTS 1107526 Voucher: 172378 ::? 17237904/15/2003005828 MARINE VIEW SAND & GRAV 16 Voucher: 172379 8 17238004/15/2003007328 MARX, EUGENE & VICTORIA 01-47476 Voucher: 172380 172381 04/15/2003007344 MAXWORTH, TREVOR K Voucher: 172381 17238204/15/2003005406 MAYBERRY, MITCHEL Voucher: 172382 17238304/15/2003001234 MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX RO 9025-00M Voucher: 172383 17238404/15/2003000370 MCCLUNG. KATHY DFLlXM Voucher: 172384 17238504/15/2003 007324 MCNEIL ISLAND CORRECTIO NDDT 4TH aT Voucher: 172385 17238604/15/2003004380 MICRO DATA BUSINESS FOR 25629-1 Voucher: 172386 17238704/15/2003 001793 MICROFLEX INC 00014226 Voucher: 172387 00014202 17238804/15/2003004128 MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERN 5333 Voucher: 172388 03-41426 Inv Date Description 02/27/2003 PK-CITY HALL MAINT SUPPLI 03/03/2003 PKM-GROUND MT MAINT SU 03/12/2003 PKCP-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 03/07/2003 PK-CITY HALL MAINT SUPPLI 03/04/2003 PKM-KLCC MAINT SUPPLIES 03/12/2003 PWS-REPAI R/MAI NT SUPPL 03/05/2003 PK-MC MAINT SUPPLIES 03/12/2003 PK-CITY HALL MAINT SUPPLI 03/24/2003 PK-CITY HALL MAINT SUPPLI 03/06/2003 PKDBC-REPAIR SUPPLIES 03/06/2003 PKM-FACILITIES MAINT SUP 03/12/2003 PKM-GROUND MT MAINT SU 03/18/2003 MSFL T-HILLSIDER 640 REPA 03/24/2003 PKMT/ASPHAL T REMOVAL:~ 03/21/2003 SWMM-MIXED ASPHALT & C 04/07/2003 MSF-REFUND ON RID100-15 I WINTER 2003 04/06/2003 PKRCS-MARTIAL ART CLS- 03/28/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC DFLlXM 03/31/2003 MSC-HEARING EXAMINER S 01/31/2003 CDA - REIMBURSE AIRFARE' 02/28/2003 PS-NARCOTIC DETECTION D 03/18/2003 PS-PRINTING SERVICES- 04/01/2003 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM P 03/12/2003 MSA-TAX AUDIT PROGRAM ~ 03/24/2003 PRCS-PRINTING SERVICES F Amount Paid 78.63 51.52 38.03 143.41 31.06 17.28 12.54 21.00 11.87 344 10.85 942 8,365.13 526.99 325.20 18.90 75.00 3,211.20 1,352.14 332.24 500.00 3,302.70 183.63 65.53 1,105.85 Check Total 429.05 8,365.13 852.19 18.90 75.00 3,211.20 1,352.14 332.24 500.00 3,302.70 249.16 1,105.85 Page: 19 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 20 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 17238904/15/2003005470 MIRAI ASSOCIATES 8 Voucher: 172389 7 17239004/15/2003003170 MODERN SECURITY SYSTE 35398 Voucher: 172390 17239104/15/2003006301 MRSC DWCl Voucher: 172391 17239204/15/2003000955 MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPAAB342128S Voucher 172392 17239304/15/2003001902 MYERS MASTER LAWN CAR Voucher: 172393 17239404/15/2003001052 NAPA AUTO PARTS Voucher: 172394 Check # Date Vendor 1\ '-;" 17239504/15/2003004445 NATIONAL SAFETY INC Voucher: 172395 Invoice DWCTO 2003 546 545 689943 687988 686759 686479 0113058-IN 0113102-IN Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total 03/07/2003 AG01-118A:TRAFFIC IMPACT 3,872.21 03/07/2003 AG01-118A:TRAFFIC IMPACT 595.09 4,467.30 03/25/2003 PKM-ALARM MONITORING S 34.82 34.82 03/26/2003 CDA - DIRECTORY OF WA C 60.00 60.00 03/1712003 PWSWMM-BRICK (2 1/4X 195.84 195.84 04/01/2003 AG01-66:LANDSCAPE MNT S 918.53 04/01/2003 AG01-66:LANDSCAPE MNT S 153.07 1,071.60 03/31/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 43.51 03/19/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 23.91 03/12/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR SUPPLIES 10.32 03/10/2003 MSFL T-REPAJR SUPPLIES 17.38 95.12 03/24/2003 PKM-GLOVES/EYEWEAR/EA 324.94 03/25/2003 PKM-FIRST AID KITIINV#01 30.19 355.13 Page: 20 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 21 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice -n \Jì 17239704/15/2003000043 NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE 152373 Voucher: 172397 151614 151829 151783 151618 151975 152237 152147 151470 151785 151821 152455 151708 152470 152419 152498 151777 151986 152227 151556 151685 152228 151901 151218 151890 152448 152016 151771 151750 152103 151735 151674 151770 152105 152387 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/24/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 91.58 03/04/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 73.86 03/10/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 61.94 03/07/2003 PW-REPAI R/MAI NT SUPPLI 60.19 03/04/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 57.39 03/13/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 48.07 03/19/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 46.81 03/17/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 44.41 02/27/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 40.72 03/07/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 40.62 03/10/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 36.80 03/25/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 36.80 03/06/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 36.31 03/26/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 34.25 03/25/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 21.53 03/26/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 17.32 03/07/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 169.27 03/13/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 17.11 03/19/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 1.00 03/03/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 16.57 03/05/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 15.04 03/19/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 12.72 03/11/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 1214 02/21/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 9.79 03/11/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 9.79 03/25/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 9.54 03/13/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 9.17 03/07/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 7.17 03/07/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 6.85 03/17/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 6.51 03/06/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 5.86 03/05/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 5.28 03/07/2003 PW-REPAI R/MAI NT SUPPLI 3.50 03/17/2003 PW-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 3.49 03/24/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 2.50 Page: 21 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 22 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17239804/15/2003000089 NEWS TRIBUNE Voucher: 172398 17239904/15/2003004701 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Voucher: 172399 17240004/15/2003007345 NGUYEN, RANDY T Voucher: 172400 172401 04/15/2003003138 NORMED Voucher: 172401 152248 152492 2536614000 Inv Date Description 03/20/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAl NT SUPP 03/26/2003 PARKS-REPAIR/MAINT SUPP 03/14/2003 PKM-RPF FOOD CONCESSIO 400102318016 03/29/2003 MSTEL-CELLULAR AIRTIME 03-41867 12378-407391 12378-407205 12378-409418 17240204/15/2003007349 NORTHWEST DESIGN CO NT 02-42011 Voucher: 172402 17240304/15/2003006200 NORTHWEST NEXUS INC 323/15884 Voucher: 172403 ï\ 172404 04/15/2003 003736 NORTHWEST TOWING INC 7755 '^ Voucher: 172404 r-' 17240504/15/2003000708 NRPA-NAT'L REC & PARKAS 19735 Voucher: 172405 17240604/15/2003005808 NW MUNICIPAL CLERKS INS CL-12003 Voucher: 172406 17240704/15/2003003529 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SE 69878-001 Voucher: 172407 17240804/15/2003005678 OKANOGAN COUNTY JAIL FEB 2003 Voucher: 172408 17240904/15/2003 006408 OLSON, MICHAEL WMTA 03 Voucher: 172409 17241004/15/2003000504 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 018059 Voucher: 172410 017731 17241104/15/2003005741 OUTCOMES BY LEVY MARCH 2003 Voucher: 172411 17241204/15/2003000112 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC FOCS87863 Voucher: 172412 focs88188 17241304/15/2003 000315 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE 1520800 Voucher: 172413 323/15884 03128/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 03/04/2003 PS-GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL 02/28/2003 PS-GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL 03/31/2003 PS-GLOVES/SAFETY SUPPL 03/31/2003 PW-REFUND BOND RELEAS 04/05/2003 MSGAC-MTHL Y INTERNET S 03/26/2003 PS-TOWING SERVICES 04/01/2003 PKiAD/PL: NRPA ASSOC 200 03/26/2003 CDA - MUNICIPAL CLERK'S I 03/18/2003 PS-PHYSICAL EXAM:HAZMA 02/28/2003 PS-JAIL SERVICES FEB 2003 WMTA 03 CON 03/24/2003 MSF- 2003 WMTA CONFERE~ 03/28/2003 SWM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPL 03/19/2003 PKM-REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLI 03/31/2003 AG01-9E: LEGISLATIVE LOBB 03/06/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 03/13/2003 PS-VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAIN 03/21/2003 PKM-TITLE REPORTS Amount Paid 2.37 2.20 364.16 2,035.59 7500 331.71 218.54 139.23 132.50 500.00 184.42 450.00 440.00 187.00 798.00 155.00 53.62 43.41 4,150.00 686.38 548.75 359.04 Check Total 1,076.47 364.16 2,035.59 75.00 689.48 132.50 500.00 184.42 450.00 440.00 187.00 798.00 155.00 97.03 4,150.00 1,235.13 359.04 Page: 22 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 23 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17241404/15/2003002044 PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY IN Voucher: 172414 17241504/15/2003006440 PAPE MACINERY INC Voucher: 172415 17241604/15/2003000920 PAPER DIRECT INC Voucher: 172416 17241704/15/2003001814 PARAMETRIX INC Voucher: 172417 17241804/15/2003005025 PCCI- PROFESSIONAL COM~21035 Voucher: 172418 21034 21036 21037 ALGEBRA 98 Invoice 120230 120444 2301738 Inv Date Description 02/18/2003 PWS-OPERATING SUPPLIE 03/03/2003 PWS-OPERATING SUPPLIES 03/11/2003 MSFL T-REPAIR/MAINT. SER 337740340101 03/27/2003 MSC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 337701330101 03/24/2003 MSC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 03-42918 02/27/2003AG02-113: 13AVE S/14 AVE & :]117241904/15/2003007139 PETTIE, TONI Voucher: 172419 17242004/15/2003 000101 PETTY CASH Voucher: 172420 17242104/15/2003001166 PETTY CASH FLASHLIGHT Voucher: 172421 KLCC 3/31/03 172422 04/15/2003 001189 PETTY CASH CM 4/4/03 Voucher: 172422 CM 4/10/03 172423 04/15/2003 002557 PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS M PKM 4/3/03 Voucher: 172423 17242404/15/2003 007333 PIFER, TIMOTHY Voucher: 172424 17242504/15/2003000808 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Voucher: 172425 172426 04/15/2003 005682 PLF INC Voucher: 172426 17242704/15/2003000566 POPICH SIGN COMPANY Voucher: 172427 17242804/15/2003000049 PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LL 581805 Voucher: 172428 581813-A 581813-B 581813 CD 4/9/03 JUROR 2868219 2868215 7710 33555 04/01/2003 AGOO-51C:CHB JANITORIAL ~ 04/01/2003 AGOO-14C:KLCC JNTRL SVC 04/01/2003 AG03-22:STEEL LK JNTRL S 04/01/2003 AG03-22:MAINT OFFICE JNT 12/20/2002 MSHR-EDUC ASSNTITUITI 04/09/2003 SWR - MILEAGEITOUART 04/11/2003 PRCS-PETTY CASH:FLASHL 03/31/2003 PRCS-MILEAGE REIMBURSEI 04/04/2003 PARKING REIMB TO PAT RI 04/10/2003 PARKING REIMB FOR GARY F 04/03/2003 PKM-FILM DEVELOPMENT 03/17/2003 MC-JUROR FEE: 3117/2003 03/14/2003 PKM-LiGHTING SUPPLIES 03/14/2003 PKM-LiGHTING SUPPLIES 03/10/2003 PS-POLICE SUPPLY BLUE L 03/27/2003 MSHR-NAME PLATES FOR N 03/18/2003 AG02-124:LAW-LEGAL SERVI 03/18/2003 AG02-137:CLASS ACTiON LA 03/18/2003 AG02-73:LEGAL SRVCS-CONi 03/18/2003 AGOO-107C LEGAL SVC (SI Amount Paid 341.63 204.63 359.50 47.93 27.94 154.92 1,846.00 950.00 333.33 375.00 272.20 223.74 200.00 162.82 247.50 163.73 73.08 15.04 40.72 32.98 770.00 222.70 4,799.85 943.60 23,475.92 470.50 Check Total 546.26 359.50 75.87 154.92 3,504.33 272.20 223.74 362.82 411.23 73.08 1504 73.70 770.00 222.70 29,689.87 Page: 23 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 24 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17242904/15/2003003829 PRO JET POWER WASHERS 100010013 Voucher: 172429 17243004/15/2003004439 PROFESSIONAL VIDEO & TA P23814 Voucher: 172430 P23815 17243104/15/2003000938 PRYOR RESOURCES INC 6509209 Voucher: 172431 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/26/2003 PKM-FUEL FILTER 4.66 4.66 03/18/2003 MSGAC-SVHS EDIT PLAYER I 1,111.17 03/18/2003 MSGAC-SVHS EDIT PLAYER I 963.47 2,074.64 03/27/2003 PS-TRAINING SEMINAR FEE I 151.23 151.23 ìJ v, -Ç. Page: 24 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 25 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) \J Vì v-, Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17243304/15/2003000051 PUGET SOUND ENERGY INC 504-228-1005 Voucher: 172433 017-470-0575 727-469-1000 398-842-1008 311-112-7001 250-275-5917 980-132-1002 669-650-2001 625-940-2003 128-255-2015 888-389-1007 128-255-3948 604-130-2008 483-657-3297 458-148-1001 487-550-2008 330-694-9979 141-467-1006 536-673-1007 250-275-0389 925-940-2007 225-650-2002 525-940-2005 241-985-1007 183-469-1006 100-093-8728 112-722-1008 373-087-1005 895-405-1002 733-829-1003 733-930-2007 131-066-1002 996-289-0001 699-699-1003 652-017-1007 Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/19/2003 PKM-FAC ELECTRCTY CHRG 3,355.65 01/21/2003 PWST-UNDERGD CONVERS 2,799.99 03/24/2003 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRCTY CH 2,055.00 03/11/2003 PKRCS-ELECTRICITY CHGS I 1,770.26 03/24/2003 PKDBC/KFT-ELECTRCTY CH 1.39468 03/11/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 701.63 03/18/2003 PKM-FAC ELECTRCTY CHRG 685.46 03/14/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 417.87 03/12/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 416.13 03/05/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 378.12 03/11/2003 MC-ELECTRICITY CHRGS ( 348.17 03/11/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 340.04 03/11/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 317.88 03/20/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 310.34 03/07/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 290.84 03/14/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 289.45 03/14/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 261.76 03/07/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 251.28 03/04/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 246.06 03/06/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 202.47 03/10/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 189.16 03/11/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 184.97 03/10/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 184.90 03/10/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 181.68 03/19/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 165.56 03/05/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 161.76 03/10/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 159.84 03/07/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 151.63 03/17/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 148.71 03/06/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 143.14 03/10/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 141.39 03/04/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 11,971.36 03/12/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 140.59 03/20/2003 PWS-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 2 5.84 03/11/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 137.30 Page: 25 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 26 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice ì\ '.1ì ç 720-429-1004 904-388-1003 497-198-1008 177-437-1007 252-150-2001 420-530-2005 342-691-1008 638-448-1005 917-259-1001 472-400-1005 233-930-2008 062-691-1002 738-448-1003 755-430-2005 889-288-1007 504-368-1005 786-203-1007 886-203-1005 004-919-1000 359-540-2003 352-691-1007 442-691-1006 221-220-2002 657-289-0009 303-218-1004 121-220-2004 17243404/15/2003000533 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES 17290 Voucher: 172434 17243504/15/2003 006860 QUIGG BROS INC Voucher: 172435 17243604/15/2003000202 QWEST Voucher: 172436 205637 Inv Date Description 03/06/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/04/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/11/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/07/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/19/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/14/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/04/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/04/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/05/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/19/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/10/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/04/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/04/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/06/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/12/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/07/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/11/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/11/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/11/2003 SWM-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 2 03/14/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/04/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/04/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/13/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/05/2003 PWST-ELECTRICITY CHRS ( 03/19/2003 PKM-FAC ELECTRCTY CHRG 03/13/2003 PWTR-ELECTRICITY CHRGS 03/25/2003 PKCP-BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 02/28/2003 PWSWMM-1 1/4" CRUSHED ~ 206T02867423 03/16/2003 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC M 936935 03/31/2003 MSDP/MC MAINTENANCE V 206T02651818 03/16/2003 MSTEL-PHONEIDATA SVC 3 253661983375 04/05/2003 MSTEL-PHONE/DATA SVC 3 Amount Paid 134.79 134.75 124.54 115.01 114.78 104.79 99.68 83.51 81.23 76.54 73.24 66.24 62.63 59.42 58.59 56.04 53.47 50.83 39.88 37.35 27.34 27.34 6.58 6.43 5.84 5.84 352.08 7406 555.29 2,992.00 438.74 60.86 Check Total 32,607.59 35208 74.06 4,046.89 Page: 26 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 27 Bank: key us bank (Continued) 172437 04/15/2003 005922 QWEST DEX Voucher: 172437 17243804/15/2003004093 QWEST INTERPRISE Voucher: 172438 17243904/15/2003006873 REGENCY CLEANERS Voucher: 172439 17244004/15/2003006442 RENT MY HONEY Voucher: 172440 172441 04/15/2003006165 RENTON FISH & GAME CLUB RFGC 2003 Voucher: 172441 17244204/15/2003004930 RHODE ISLAND NOVELTY 1009064 Voucher: 172442 172443 04/15/2003 005939 RIGHT BRAIN UNLIMITED LL 23220 \\ Voucher: 172443 \.1\' 17244404/15/2003006441 RYAN-CONNELLY. LESLIE PWSM-REIMB ,~ Voucher: 172444 17244504/15/2003004849 SAMS SANITARY & MAINTEN 75143 Voucher: 172445 17244604/15/2003 007140 SCHNEIDER HOMES INC Voucher: 172446 17244704/15/2003006241 SCHROEDER, JEANNE Voucher: 172447 17244804/15/2003000790 SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENC50680432 Voucher: 172448 17244904/15/2003000106 SELECT TRAVEL INC Voucher: 172449 172450 04/15/2003 001988 SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY Voucher: 172450 Check # Date Vendor Invoice 014026678000 253D08604604 18432 197361 02-37344 PS 4/1103 303241026 327/2540 320/6845 313/2144 172451 04/15/2003002501 SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUC'117889 Voucher: 172451 17245204/15/2003003873 SIGN-A-RAMA 6647 Voucher: 172452 17245304/15/2003000056 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTI28756 Voucher: 172453 6647 Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total 03/22/2003 PKDBC-DIRECTORY AD MAR 265.74 265.74 03/19/2003 MSTEL-DATA COMM LINES 3 511.33 511.33 03/31/2003 AG02-98:PS DRY CLNG SVCS 3,110.74 3,110.74 03/31/2003 PKDBC-TOILET REPAIR (AD 110.51 110.51 03/19/2003 PS-MEMBERSHIP FEES: BILL 63.36 63.36 03/20/2003 PRCS-RWB FESTIVAL GENEf 55.74 55.74 03/13/2003 PKM-DOG MITT DISPENSER I 65.23 65.23 03/31/2003 PWSWM - CONFERENCE P 162.71 16271 03/17/2003 PKCP-JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 688.25 688.25 03/27/2003 PW-REFUND ADM CASH DE 182.40 182.40 04/01/2003 PS-MILEAGE REIMB:T. HOCH 175.84 175.84 03/24/2003 PS-NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIP 37.70 37.70 03/24/2003 PS-AIRFARE:CITY TRAVEL R 301.50 301.50 03/27/2003 PRCS- LINEN CLEANING 22.52 03/20/2003 PRCS- LINEN CLEANING 18.81 03113/2003 PRCS- LINEN CLEANING 21.42 62.75 04/01/2003 PW-SWMM-TYPE 1 CATCH B 1,067.00 1,067.00 04/08/2003 PWSWR-TRANSLATED & LA 40.80 40.80 03/26/2003 MSC-PRINTING SERVICES 165.91 165.91 Page: 27 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 28 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 17245404/15/2003004738 SKAMANIA LODGE Voucher: 172454 17245504/15/2003003340 SMITH PHD, DAVID H Voucher: 172455 17245604/15/2003006531 SMITH. PEGGY S. Voucher: 172456 17245704/15/2003001045 SOS TECHNOLOGIES Voucher: 172457 17245804/15/2003004963 SOUND PUBLISHING INC Voucher: 172458 Invoice 369290 9954655 352 117846 4038 012968 013025 012994 17245904/15/2003007186 SPECIAL INTEREST AUTO W~118930 ì\ Voucher: 172459 117417 \f\ 17246004/15/2003001618 SPEEDY AUTO & WINDOW G 1052053 C-- Voucher: 172460 172461 04/15/2003004981 SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMI6086-A Voucher: 172461 17246204/15/2003002548 SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL Voucher: 172462 1-336263 1-336264 1-333772 17246304/15/2003005602 SPRINGWOODASSOCIATES 11010 Voucher: 172463 17246404/15/2003700416 ST PATRICK'S PARISH Voucher: 172464 17246504/15/2003003307 STERICYCLE INC Voucher: 172465 17246604/15/2003005910 SUMNER TRACTOR & EOUI 269425 Voucher: 172466 17246704/15/2003006414 SUMNER VETERINARY HOS 233351 Voucher: 172467 17246804/15/2003004356 SUMPTER, KYLE 000010 Voucher: 172468 172469 04/15/2003 003085 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION 2042259 Voucher: 172469 2045136 C2213R13429 0002139822 0000104484 Inv Date DescriDtion Amount Paid Check Total 03/14/2003 PS-POLICE LODGING:COMM¡ 783.42 03/20/2003 PS-POLICE LODGING FEES B 58.68 842.10 03/14/2003 PS- 8 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PS 3,000.00 3,000.00 03/27/2003 PKRCS-REFUND FOR REC C 4.50 4.50 03/31/2003 MSHR-CPR/FIRST AID TRAI 875.00 875.00 03/15/2003 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 212.40 03/29/2003 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 212.40 03/22/2003 MSHR-JOB ADVERTISEMENT 212.40 637.20 03/05/2003 PS- TOWING SERVICE 192.20 03/05/2003 PS- TOWING SERVICES 95.00 287.20 03/26/2003 PS-WINDSHIELD REPAIR #80 54.40 54.40 04/03/2003 PS-RIOTCONTROL TACTIC N 525.00 525.00 03/03/2003 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC 92.48 03/03/2003 PKDBC-PEST CONTROL SVC 272.00 02/03/2003 PKRLS-PEST CONTROL SVC 52.22 416.70 03/31/2003 AG#00-155:CEL PK MTGTN M 1,884.82 1,884.82 04/03/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 77. 73 77.73 02/28/2003 PS-WASTE DISPOSAL FEES 10.96 10.96 03/27/2003 PKM-TRACTOR PIN 6.69 6.69 01/24/2003 PS-K-9 PROGRAM VETERINA 219.69 219.69 03/20/2003 PS-POLICE BUSINESS REIM 68.86 68.86 02/28/2003 MS/POL -COPS MORE 2002 - 1.657.02 03/10/2003 PS-COPS MORE 2002- SWIT 662.59 2,319.61 - Page: 28 apChkLst 0411512003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 29 Bank: kev us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 1724700411512003005113 THE ADMINISTRATOR OFFIC B WOODROW Voucher: 172470 172471 04/15/2003 006033 THE FAB SHOP LLC Voucher: 172471 Z-1281 Z-1423 Z-1444 6790 6791 200315 172472 04/15/2003 002819 THE FINISHING TOUCH Voucher: 172472 17247304/15/2003005623 THUILLIER. JENNIFER Voucher: 172473 17247404/15/2003001267 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC 336508 Voucher: 172474 ~ 17247504/15/2003001436 TREE RECYCLERS 3/1831< 1J Voucher: 172475 $ 172476 04/15/2003 002426 UNITED GROCERS CASH & C 17111 Voucher: 172476 17066 172477 04/15/2003003837 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 000F6588V133 Voucher: 172477 17247804/15/2003000769 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY CO I 5768359 Voucher: 172478 5766303 5765498 5764832 5764797 5764856 172479 04/15/2003 005704 VERTICAL TRANSPORT A TIO DVT05646X403 Voucher: 172479 17248004/15/2003007305 VILLAGE SUPPLIES LTD 352318 Voucher: 172480 172481 04/15/2003006173 VINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOC2300R13405 Voucher: 172481 17248204/15/2003007304 WAASSOC OF TELECOM OF WATOA 2003 Voucher: 172482 17248304/15/2003003606 WA STATE CRIME PREVENTI WSCPA FLOR Voucher: 172483 17248404/15/2003004339 WA STATE DEPT OF PERSON1058-D Voucher: 172484 3/183/21/03 352318 Inv Date Description 04/01/2003 MC-JOINT MGRS SPRING P 03/17/2003 PKMT/STAGE REPAIR 03/21/2003 MSFL T - REPAIRS SVC 03/31/2003 MSFL T - REPAIRS SVC #113 03/18/2003 PKDBC-CLEAN/REGROUT S 03/18/2003 PKDBC-SCRAPE/CAULK TUB 03/31/2003 GRAPHICS FOR BROCHUREI 03/20/2003 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 03/21/2003 PKM-REMOVE MAPLE FROM 03/20/2003 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 03/20/2003 PKRCS-PROGRAM SUPPLIE 03/29/2003 PS-DOCUMENT DELIVERY S 03/24/2003 PKDBC - PIPE SUPPLIES 03/19/2003 PKDBC - PIPE SUPPLIES 03/19/2003 PKDBC - PIPE SUPPLIES 03/19/2003 PKDBC - PIPE SUPPLIES 03/19/2003 PKDBC - PIPE SUPPLIES 03/19/2003 PKDBC - PIPE SUPPLIES 03/20/2003 AG01-61:CITY HALL ELEVATC 03/04/2003 PS-FINGERPRINT SUPPLIES 04/03/2003 PKDBC-REFUND RENTAL DE 03/26/2003 MSTEL-WATOA MEMBERSHI 03/27/2003 PS-WSCPA SPR CONF S. FL 03/20/2003 AG02-55:RETREAT FACILITA Amount Paid 80.00 6,673.56 206.72 1,554.75 788.80 103.36 375.00 82.66 652.80 192.63 67.07 8.62 440.18 229.63 167.98 112.80 883.25 50.62 145.14 89.80 48.67 50.00 175.00 700.00 Check Total 80.00 8.435.03 892.16 375.00 82.66 652.80 259.70 8.62 1,88446 145.14 89.80 48.67 50.00 175.00 700.00 Page: 29 apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01 :45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 30 Bank: key us bank (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Invoice 17248504/15/2003000280 WA STATE EMPLOYMENT S 537-78-9734 Voucher: 172485 17248604/15/2003004553 WA STATE OFFICE OF MINO 4/1-6/30/03 Voucher: 172486 17248704/15/2003000851 WA STATE PATROL Voucher: 172487 17248804/15/2003006853 WAHl. PRAN Voucher: 172488 17248904/15/2003006007 WALKER ACE HARDWARE Voucher: 172489 17249004/15/2003000266 WCPDA-WASHINGTON CITY fWCPDA2003 Voucher: 172490 -n 172491 04/15/2003003500 WESCOM COMMUNICATIO 13352 ç' Voucher: 172491 0 17249204/15/2003 001241 WEST COAST AWARDS 39452 Voucher: 172492 17249304/15/2003000541 WESTERN EQUIPMENT DIS 321241 Voucher: 172493 319749 17249404/15/2003001990 WESTERN LlNENIWELCOME 1113/0325 Voucher: 172494 172495 04/15/2003 001798 WESTERN PETERBIL T INC T238021 Voucher: 172495 17249604/15/2003002087 WHITMAN GLOBAL CARPET C21681 Voucher' 172496 21683 21682 21684 17249704/15/2003005680 WILD WEST INTERNATIONAL2189 Voucher: 172497 172498 04/15/2003 005805 WILLIAMS OIL FILTER SVC C 495990 Voucher: 172498 17249904/15/2003007346 WILLIAMS. BILLY L 03-41776 Voucher: 172499 17250004/15/2003006749 WILLIAMS. HILARY ALYSSA CA# 28169 Voucher: 172500 00018880 10302514 CA#25796 CA#66281 0009609916 39452 03-41776 Inv Date Descriotion 03/19/2003 PS-EMPLOYMENT SECURIT 03/31/2003 MS-PRORATED SHARE FOR I 03/15/2003 MSDP-DATA STATION SVC 04/03/2003 MSHR-BACKGROUND CHEC 03/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 2579 02/25/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA# 6628 03/31/2003 PKM-GRD:CNSTRCTN TOOL 03/20/2003 CDA - PLAN'G DIR ANNUAL M 04/02/2003 PS-CALIBRATE RADAR SYST 03/13/2003 PKKFT-UNIFORM CLOTHING 03/20/2003 MSFLT-TORO MOWER REPA 03/31/2003 PKM-REPAIR SUPPLIES/EQU 03/24/2003 PKRLS-CARPET RENTAL 3/ 03/18/2003 MSFLT-CITYVEHICLE REPA 03/31/2003 AG03-11 :CARPET CLEANING 03/31/2003 AG03-11 CARPET CLEANING 03/31/2003 AG03-11 :CARPET CLEANING 03/31/2003 AG03-11 :CARPET CLEANING 03/31/2003 PS-FIRING RANGE FEE SVC~ 03/27/2003 MSFL T-VEHICLE SUPPLIES 03/28/2003 PS-REFUND TRAFFIC SCHOC 03/12/2003 MC-INTERPRETER:CA#2816 Amount Paid 10.37 25.00 3,416.31 20.00 140.00 100.00 28.57 50.00 81.60 377.32 129.85 66,58846 90.05 261.76 798.89 98.89 398.00 319.89 121.86 20.23 75.00 45.00 Check Total 10.37 25.00 3,436.31 240.00 28.57 50.00 81.60 377.32 66,718.31 9005 261.76 1,615.67 121.86 20.23 75.00 45.00 Page: 30 apChklst 0411512003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 31 (Continued) Bank: key us bank Check # Date Vendor 172501 04/15/2003005336 WilSON, JASON Voucher: 172501 17250204/15/2003006225 WilSON. TERRY Voucher: 172502 17250304/15/2003 701265 WRPA Voucher: 172503 17250404/15/2003000428 WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASS 2125 Voucher: 172504 Invoice Amount Paid 60.00 Inv Date DescriDtion 03/20/2003 PS-EXPlORER CHALLENGE I CCACC 03 PS 3123-3/27 04/0112003 PS-MILEAGE REIMB:TRAINI 175.93 2103 03/10/2003 PRCS-WRPA CONF DUES/D 255.00 03/24/2003 PKM-WRPA REGISTRATION 255.00 Sub total for us bank: ~ Check Total 60.00 175.93 255.00 255.00 741,967.53 Page: 31 .... M Q¡ C) co D- >- ~ ûí...J :J~ "'w "'0 "w c3... -... ~ 0 ¡¡:~ õ :::¡; D- on ~ 0 N M -0 I/) 0 ...J.... '" - .con U:!: 0...,. CO 0 '" LO r- <0 0>- ~ r- N '" (¡j 0> ro D- iñ '" '" .. .c U < ñi Õ I- " c CO <5 .¿ 0 0. e I/) 5 .= I/) '" '" .. .c '" on ... .... FIÓV apChkLst 04/15/2003 2:01:45PM Final Check List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Page: 33 Void Checks Bank code: key Check # Date ~ 04/15/2003 172304 04/15/2003 172396 04/15/2003 172432 04/15/2003 ~ Page: 33 MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# ..::rz::-(G:-) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: March 2003 Quarterly Financial Report CATEGORY: ~ CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS BUDGET IMPACT: D ORDINANCE D PUBUC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: March 2003 Quarterly Financial Report SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee during their April 22nd meeting, PROPOSED MOTION: "I move for the approval of the March 2003 Quarterly Financial Report." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 0511012001 E:Z CITY OF ~ Federal Way MEMORANDUM Date: April 15,2003 To: Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee From: Via: Tho Kraus, Finance Manager David Moseley, City Manager Subject: March 2003 Quarterly Financial Report Action ReQuested: Accept the March 2003 Quarterly Financial Report and forward to the May 6th Council meeting for full Council approval. K: IFINIM FR IMFRFED RACCVR.OOC J-I EJ- Citv of Federal Wav March 2003 Duarterlv Financial Reoort ~~ [ I CITY OF ~ I Quarterly Financial Report - March, 2003 I Federal WaY-~-~~~-~~~~~-~----~ ...~-- J YTD Operating Revenues vs Operating Expenditures Thru March The Quarterly Financial Report is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that has taken place in the reporting period. This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid Waste & Recycling, HoteI/MoteI Lodging Tax, Paths & Trails, Surface Water Management, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Center. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial activity through March for the years 1998 through 2003. Tax Incentives for City Center Residential Development The City Council approved a tax incentive code amendment to encourage city center development. Developers of new multifamily housing improvements would receive a 10-year property tax exemption. However, taxes on land and commercial portions of any project would not be exempt. National Awardfor City's Diversity Commission The City of Federal Way's Diversity Commission received the award March 9th during the National League of Cities Congressional City Conference in Washington DC. The City's Diversity Commission was given this award because it "sets a strong example of how cities can improve and promote cultural diversity in their communities", PugetSound Energy Filesfor Natural Gas Rate Increase On March 5th, PSE requested a rate increase as a result of the rising wholesale prices it pays to acquire natural gas for its customers. PSE will not make a profit from the increased rate rather it simply passes the costs to its customers with no mark-up. PSE is asking for the new rates to take effect April 10th. If approved, the price PSE customers pay for natural gas will still be among the lowest in the state. Gradual Remake of the Mall James D. Yoder, VP of Steadfast Commercial Properties, the new owners of the SeaTac Mall, says that that the company's main priority is to bring more of the City's retail dollars into the mall instead of letting those dollars slip away to other tax jurisdictions. A recent study revealed that while average per capita spending in South King County is about $28,000 annually, per capita spending in Federal Way is only about half that amount. To achieve those goals, the new owners are undertaking a gradual remake of the mall which will include re-naming the mall, performing interior and exterior renovations, reducing the number of retail spaces, assisting existing retailers through special promotions, and other short and long-term efforts. A theatre and a play center for children are also under consideration. Discussions are also being held between Steadfast and the Federal Way School District, concerning the continued tenancy of the school district's mall resource center, one of the few such school resource centers in the nation. F3 CitvofFederal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort General governmental operating revenue collections through rlIst quarter, 2003, total $9.I5M, which is $76K or 0.8% above the YTD budget of $9.07M. Of this amount, $ I 53K is related to Utility taxes and REET that are reserved for the payment of debt services. Attachment A provides a comparison ofYTD revenues by major sources for 2003 with comparative figures for the past five years. REVENUE SUMMARY BY MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Period Ending March 31, 2003 Building Permits/Fees-CD Expedited Review Fees-CD ROW P.,mlts/Fees-PW Expedited Review Fees-PW Licenses F",nchise Fees Recreation Fees 227,344 $ 2.781,314 32.360 428.735 799.755 346,190 555.902 1.735.129 244.948 279.971 19.841 86.553 643 31.552 139.590 132.392 132.223 12.900 292.491 119,076 144.639 36.658 202.317 15,372 ~,798;495 . 5.739.885 :.'«14.~,*':$:' Dumas Bay Centre Knutzen Family Theatre Interest Eamln9s dmin/Cash Management Fees SWM Fees her '"~tPt.iþþ.mi"g:I!.".,,~..: . Other Flnancln9 Sources TotoilWv.òliò. &:Otho<SOÙ"'$' . .: 2oa3:Re.,..dBùd9.' :-,-.". '. :thrilugl>... 'Än"~aJ : March' 7,777,226 $ 302,740 $ 10,999,574 2.897.693 134.000 25,074 1.611.369 402,090 3.345.546 776,138 1.900,000 333,549 1,850,000 452,668 7.747,611 1,945.632 l.aI8,813 287,976 1.179.818 273,242 54.739 88.036 3.934 48.485 150,577 154,914 108,329 12.862 172,966 131,648 142,846 54.486 250,320 22,604 ~)!~74'i:: 4,177.399 <t3,2$1M$í$.': 261,202 $ 2,844,807 21,805 407,232 820,359 474,664 598,513 1.755,853 216,189 421,439 9.339 64,047 15.252 60.599 163,447 176.878 130.893 18,982 119,531 101,525 130,465 52,725 214,246 24.825 . 'S;la4,818' . 4.45M05 < j$;~82.:121:' '$: . 369.455 142.tOO 621.964 930.450 493,750 69.976 743,621 526.592 3.432.770 165,240 926,062 98.292 :- 48;064;247. . 16,061.663 ~M4~,91oJ$ < t1 . Aètùà'O:: . Tlirói<9h. March <. 302.740 2.743,687 32,590 409.106 753.672 784.124 468.763 1,648,a14 365.054 297.510 54,739 124.647 3,934 28,718 172.938 163.377 136.916 20,545 78,429 131.648 142.846 68,138 162.856 54,370 : 9,i'9;..{ 4,177,399 . 13;32M80. .f< <.V"'à"C. .,: l:iiVó¡Üie¡UÒÒl;;';làbie,.' 'i>èiiià~j$):I:"~centrM 0.0% -5.3% 30.0% 1.7% -2.9% (154.006) 7,516 7,017 (22,466) 450.575 16,095 (297.618) 97.078 24.269 36.811 (19,766) 22.360 8.463 28.587 7,664 (94.53?) (0) 13,652 (87.463) 31,566 ".'i5,Bt,,: :- ~~;g1$:' 135.1% 3.6% -15.3% 36.2% 8.9% 0.0% 41.8% 0.0% -40.8% 14.8% 5.5% 26,4% 59.7% -54.7% 0.0% 0.0% 25.1% -34.9% 0.0% ::-Q" 0.0% <.0;8% 2 Citv of Federal War March 1003 Ouarterlv Financial Report Real Estate Excise Tax To date, actual collections of $784K exceed the ytd budget of $334K by $450K or 135%. Compared to 2002, collections are up $309K or 65%. March's receipt of $ 13 OK is $3.5K above the monthly estimate and includes only one major transaction - the sale of a retail/office building on South 341" Place for $1.2M. Sales in the current month include a total of 229 real estate transactions, of which 89 were tax exempt, and of the remaining 140,4 were mobile home sales. Other significant transactions during the fITst quarter include: January. The Pointe at Redondo Apartments ($15.5M); Abam Office Building ($6.5M); Washington Park Office Building ($5.5M); Charwood Mobile Home Park ($3.IM); an office building on 23'. Ave South ($4.IM); and another office building on South 336th ($IM). February - SeaTac Mall ($37M); Spectrum Business Park ($4.5M); and a retail/office building on South 341" Place ($1.8M). REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX ACTIVITY Year-to-date through March $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- g,'P ,,"5 ,,~ g,CiJ ,,"5 e'" r¡,'iS e" r¡,'iS "",,')r «"q. -,S>if <¡; en;, ,?-CJ r¡,'iS en;, r¡,'iS r-5 CitvofFederal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort Sales Tax Ytd sales tax of$2.74M is $I54K or 5.3% below the ytd budget of$2.9M. Ytd 2002 collection is also below ytd 2002 of$2.84M by $IOIK or 3.6%. Current month's sales tax of$735K is below the monthly budget by $102K or 12.3%. Fob Mar pr May Jun Jul UQ Sap Oct 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Nov """""p~"""Md~....,y.."h,,'" Retail Trade Services onstrucVContract holesaling ransp/Comm/Utility Manufacturing Government Fin/Ins/Real Estate Other -5.1% 5.7% -7.8% -10.4% 1.9% -32.9% 54.6% 26.4% -5.2% Retail sales continue to remain the largest source of sales tax revenue, accounting for 66% of all sales tax collections. Ytd 2003 collection is down $96K or 5% lower than ytd 2002. Decreases can be found in retail food stores ($I4K due to one store not reporting for the current period) auto sales ($23K), retail furniture ($30K), and miscellaneous retail trade ($20K). Service industries account for 10.9% of the total sales tax collections through I" quarter. On a ytd basis, service sales tax is up $I8K or 6% from rd 2002. The increase is mainly due to one taxpayer grouped under amusement/recreation that reported about $2M in sales for 4' quarter 2002. Staff is following up with the state to find out the nature of this distribution. Construction and contracting activity, which accounts for 10.3% of sales tax collections is $23K or 8% below year 2002 activity. This is consistent with the downward trend we are seeing in building permits through the first quarter. Wholesale tax which accounts for about 5% of total sales tax collection, is $I5K or 10% below year 2002 activity due an overall decline in activity. tb Citv of Federal Wav March 1003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoart SALES TAX ACTIVITY BY SIC CODE YTD Through March 2003 Sales Tax Activity by Area -11.1% -3.3% 13.4% 12.9% 1 ¡ç¡j\,,;~ '267,240 1.2% 1.6% 1.2% 3.6% -11.9% -9.1% na na 13.6% 13.0% 11.8% 12.0% 10.3% 9.7% -0.6% -5.7% '89,165, 85.194 ,1%f!lf790, -. 'h~' 115,817 93;342 ($22¡'4'l5f ,::'19.4% 12.6% -4.5% 38.3% -17.7% 19.5% -19.4% na na 3.9% 3.5% 4.3% 3.5% 4.1% 3.4% -0.7% -16.4% 22,589' 39,389 ;~_. =:§è 118: .cy"y¡¡¡¡141;720; 1'46;809; '$5,089 :t.ß.% % chg from prev yr -2.2% 74.4% 223.3% -6.7% 19.3% 3.6% na na Parcentaga of total 1.0% 1.6% 4.7% 4.3% 5.0% 5.4% 0.4% 7.4% 30;~8 7 .o;;/';'-" ~; :115,155 . $21-" % chg from prev yr -9.1% 35.1% 48.2% 3.0% 113.6% -15.7% na na Percentage of total 1.3% 1.7% 2.3% 2.3% 4.8% 4.2% -0.6% -12.6% otela&,MOIela 1!Jj -- - 7!F;;X; '.,11;621 ,-;:~;. 20,939 31;145 1Q¡2Ø11' :;1';,48.7,% % chg from prev yr 10.1% 23.1% 67.0% 75.4% -32.3% 48.7% na na Percentage of total 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 1.1% 0.7% 1.1% 0.4% 54.2% The City's largest retail center, South 348th, which generates about 13% of the City's sales tax experienced a $I2K or 3.3% declined compared to 2002. All areas are down except for retail eating and drinking which is up $3K. SeaTac Mall is showing a $27K or 9% decline compared to 2002. On a YTD basis for taxes paid, retail general merchandise is down $I8K; retail apparel & accessories down $2K; electronics and furniture down $5K; miscellaneous retaiVother down $7K; retail eating & drinking up $4K. January & February 2003's sales tax were significantly lower compared to 2002, while March's distribution remained relatively similar. Major auto sales are down $22K or 19% due to significant declines in sales compared to last year. South 312'h to South 3I6'h is up $5K or 3.6% due to a major retail general merchandise store increasing by $8K. Pavilion Center is down $21K or 16%. Major contributors to the decline are: retail furniture (down $5K); a major electronics/appliance store (down $IOK); and retail food stores & eating/drinking (down $3K). ËÎ CilV of Federal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort Hotels & Motels I" quarter sales tax total $3IK, which is $IOK or 49% above the same period in 2002. Two major hotels account for the increase. SALES TAX BY AREA YTD through March, 2003 Other 64.4% Gambling Tax To date, actual collections of $468K is $16K or 3.6% above the ytd budget of $453K. In comparison to ytd 2002, the current quarter's tax collection is down by $130K or 21.7%. This decrease is in cardroom tax which accounts for 80% of the total gambling tax revenue. The newest of the top three cardroom establishments reported substantially higher activity in March compared to January and February, but tax collections are slightly lower compared to the card room that it replaced. The other two establishments account for $98K or 75% of the decline when compared to 2002. Ée 6 Citv of Federal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort HoteVMotel Lodging Tax Lodging taxes coHected through March total $32K, which is $7.5K or 30% above the ytd budget of $25K due to an increase in activity at one hotel and timing of payments at another hotel. 52.0% 34.8% Utility Tax The utility tax rate increased from 5% to 6% effective February 1,2003. The additional 1% was adopted by Council to fund new service level adjustments and is budgeted to yield an additional $1.25M. Quite a few phone and ceHuIar companies have not adjusted to the new rates. Based on staff's audit, we anticipate an additional $15K from phone and $13K from cellular for February activity. The analysis below does not reflect these anticipated receipts. Council also approved an ordinance earlier this year that would provide utility tax relief for low income seniors. The ordinance would relieve the fuH6% of the utility tax to eligible citizens through a City administered "rebate" program. The first requests for reimbursement of paid 2003 (February through December) utility taxes will be due no later than April 30, 2004. YTD taxes received total $1.65M, which is $298K or 15.3% below the ytd budget of$1.95M. Compared to ytd 2002, the decrease is $1O7K or 6.1%. Gas is below the ytd budget of$407K by $148K or 34%. Compared to ytd 2002, gas is down $I27K or 32%. Electricity is below the ytd budget of $706 by $93K or 13%. Compared to 2002, electricity is up $21K or 3.6%. Cellular is below the ytd budget of $295K by $I5K or 5%. However, compared to prior years' activity, ceHuIar activity continues to increase. Phone is down $21K compared to ytd budget, and also down $8K compared to prior year's I" quarter coHections. E:'l 7 Citv of Federal Waf March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort Utility Tax Revenue Thru March 2003 Phon' 14.42" Ce",'" 16.97" EI_c 37.24" G,- 626" G.. 1572" as Solid Waste Cable Phone Cellular Pager SWM State Shared Revenue I" quarter's distribution of $ 1.1 6M is below the ytd budget of$1.I8M by $ISK or 1.3%. The unfavorable variance is due mainly to vehicle licensing fees offset by major increases liquor profits tax, liquor excise tax and criminal justice high crime. As of December Sth, the effective date of 1-776, local license fees collected in King and Pierce Counties are being held in an account at the State Treasurer's Office until it is detennined whether the initiative is constitutional. According to the state, through I" quarter the City's share is $IS6K but anticipated distribution date is uncertain at this time. Considering the $IS6K distribution held with the state, the result would be a favorable variance of$140K or 12%. 35.064 6,689 6,825 3,837 116,124 108.338 110,704 110,553 104.080 109,164 171,691 62,507 56,070 38,887 36,415 66,458 72,065 60,393 73,054 12.662 32,117 31.866 33,916 17,691 19,286 20,116 18,611 (1.505) 140,719 173,087 40,798 40.796 185.049 197.937 24,058 5,136 5,136 331.764 362,640 _~428,735 407,232 402,090 409.106 7,017 397,990 395,456 434,712 423,211 415,228 422,627 7,399 644,532 144.737 167,616 163,048 171.217 18,196 (153,021) 10,908 2.725 3,606 3,561 3.561 ~IO Citv of Federal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort Building Permits and Plan Check Fees Overall Community Development ytd pennit revenue of $298K is above the ytd budget of $273K by $24K or 9%. This does not include ytd pass-through revenue of $55K for expedited and environmental review. Ytd building pennits, including mechanical, plumbing and clear/grade pennits total $158K, which exceeds the ytd budget of $I33K by $25K or 19%. Electrical pennits total $3IK and is above the ytd budget by $6K or 26%. Plan check fees of$73K exceed the ytd budget by $19K or 21%. Major pennits issued through the flfst quarter include Star Lake Vista development, Rosewood, and Tresden Place. 9 E;/I Citv of Federal Way March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort The table below presents a synopsis of 1" quarter's building pennit activity for new construction between 2001 and 2003: Building Divisiuu - Permit Activity YTD Through March, 2003 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 'Typóofformit. :.:NO;", ¥¥Jilú;($j. .~No~~.' :YOIiJ<¡$j ..No;:" :"Volo.:($)'.. New Residential (Platted) 9 $ 1,618,226 32 $ 5,654,270 40 $ 9,570,644 New Commercial 4 15,393,080 5 24,233,941 2 445,972 New Multi-Family Units 3 873,919 I 0 0 0 New Public 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:stibtotid:'New:CoriitiWiiilil'.: ::16:: .:.S:~ 11,885;22:$:' A8.' :.$ ".19;888;m. '..42 .$' W,OI6:6:1i, Manufactured Homes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential Alterations 25 970,453 33 715,181 24 1,018,782 Commercial Alterations 69 5,537,002 128 6,609,919 44 3,703,924 Plumbing Only 22 0 25 0 18 0 Mechanical Only 85 410,114 84 432,583 71 183,315 Misc. Building Pennits 0 0 0 0 0 0 :stibtotal':Alteiatiorii:::" ::201.' ..$.' . :h;91';5iÐ: .'216...'$'. '1;151;683. m $ .':4;906:021: Electrical Pennits 286 0 273 0 266 0 .:TotaJll\iuitiuj¡:I:'«iiti¡;¡:': 550~,:$: ::~;$U2;7~;J::::$n, ':Sn,6'i5;lj94 '.465.. $. .'14;922;637 Non-Building Permits: Sign Pennits 59 119,664 67 142,212 55 143,574 T~~ :"59.~ $$~: ..n9;6Ií'r:. ''67:: : $: .1~212' : 55' : .S. :1:43;5:74. ITotaICònim.:rc¡'iJVåíúatiò';::. 0..1.3.~ . 'S"~:2Q;ÓJJO;OS1: 'U3"$" JO;843;860'" 46' . S . '4;t4989fi Còm:titercial:ai:it:%:òfTòhil:', ttW". ":,114%: :23%:' 82%' 10%: '28%:" . Includes all new, alternatIOn ROW Permits and Fees Overall Public Works pennils and fees collected Ihrough March tolal $I25K, which is $37K or 42% above the ytd budget of$88K. The $37K favorable variance is comprised of: $IOK decrease in ROW pennits and $IOK decrease in plan review fees offset by a $57K increase in inspection fees. 10 ~/Z-- Citv of Federal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort Court Revenue Court revenue is $4K or 1.9% above the YTD budget of$2I2K from fines and forfeitures. Total court revenue collected through I" quarter amounts to $365K, which is $97K or 36.2% above the YTD budget of$267K. Traffic and non-parking is up $31K or 31 % compared to 2002 and is more in line with prior years' collections. Parking infractions are up $7K or 8% compared to 2002. Probation services revenue total $148K but has associated expenditures ($11 7K), resulting in net revenues of$31K. January February March April May June July August September October November December 62,565 $ 66.562 84.843 82.673 61.106 72,121 61,536 71,255 62.059 58.199 64.346 58,863 61,809 $ 83,491 83,707 74,273 75,541 73,046 71,957 97,179 71,311 60.635 71,783 65.100 78.577 $ 70.573 74,074 77,631 62.169 73,812 59,668 71,793 67,015 62,650 52,340 45.366 48,982 $ 57.256 69.769 72,609 46,487 49,004 65.189 68.659 55.775 79,013 67.344 66,133 ""1ucIed "Court Reve"uea..Probabatlo" Se""",T.... School Adm" Fee <even... as ","as """"',,es from OO""tCourtto,"Shaoed CourtCosts", "CourtReeo", Se"," ""doth"Court..~ted m.cella"",,", <even.... T.... Schoo' Adm", Feeft""" lheadd""aICourtCIeI1< posII"m. Civil Pe"alties 1,272 2,731 931 1,784 1,324 6.761 Traff", & Non-Pa"""" 142,666 125,643 136,601 130,066 96,938 543.548 Palki"9 '"fractioos 6,766 16,290 9,125 20,146 6.332 51,007 DUI & Other Misd 22,406 26,411 35,568 36,619 37,114 145,Q47 Crimi"a' Traffic Misd 11.585 14,793 17,706 13,178 13,662 63,469 Crimi'" Costs" 14.574 22,278 24,956 19,524 15.522 67,432 Sharad Court Costs 10.535 3,624 2,099 1.907 1,115 11,532 Probatio" Services" 38,724 110,000 Traffic Schoo' Admin Fee 1.457 'C_.oo..""',..--", """""'"o",..""..e'c"""",, el3 1,494 129,667 15,429 36,666 14.783 17,467 1,233 (91) 2.510 3.476 2,677 (116) (3,023) (1.470) 93.115 169.3% 0.0% 11 Citv of Federal Wav March 2003 Quarterlv Financial Reoort General governmental expenditures through March total $8.3M or 14% of the annual operating budget of $55.9M. Operating expenditures are below the ytd budget of$9.IM by $780K or 8.6%. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT Period Ending March 31, 2003 . 2003:Re"i-.IIBIId et... ,,: ",~tQ.".:: .'.'..'.'."V1In."ee'."" :::>iiJji1:.:< 2002: Th~ouilli<. . Th:i'Qiljjh: :: FåÝoÌ'åIÌI.> UiitåÝoÌ'åble) . ::;!ièlliál< .. ::.ACtuaI. :.' :'<lIIari:h': '<. .. '::fI1àri:h:::::.. < <D<illa;,. j~) P.rolintj'k) City Counoil 112,057 $ 157.169 $ 260.050 $ 149.373 $ 142,177 $ 7,196 4.8% City Manager 161.801 171.007 691.203 192,293 168.289 24.004 12.5% Municipal Court-Operations 259,514 320,961 1.210,569 292,716 376,962 (84.246) -28.8% Management Services 431.214 444.628 2,005,360 496,928 438,459 58,469 11.8% Civil/Criminal Le9al Services 282,396 299,675 1,448,586 381.558 232,497 149,061 39.1% Comm. Development Services 664.096 689,753 3,606.322 831,618 799.544 32.073 3.9% Police Services 3,420,599 3,455.477 15,572,132 3,960.068 3.919.267 40,800 1.0% Jail Services 228,057 221,175 1.342.000 213.202 179.397 33,805 15.9% Parks and Recreation 629,091 639,170 4.041,628 852,379 691.021 161.358 18.9% Public Works 610,910 751,430 4,090,497 888,456 647,062 241,394 27.2% City Overlay Program 21,431 24,580 2.379,347 40,535 40,535 0.0% Solid Waste 75,452 55,516 420,855 78.616 66,064 12,532 1S.9% HoteVMotel Lod9in9 Tax 5.763 22,109 367,662 41.325 3.629 37,696 91.2% Surface Water Management 335,907 422.468 2.198,152 514.148 424,366 89.782 17.5% Debt Service 10,245 (3,800) 15,630,394 15.271 15,271 0.0% Dumas Bay Centre 129,993 130.710 493,796 119.299 124.502 (5,203) -4.4% Knutzen Fami! Theatre 43,380 31,003 177,050 29,638 48,122 18,464 -62.4% Subtot¡¡IO .ratio :Ex' '.ndi1ùre$:': <7;421;900.' <:1 ;031< 55;935;594' : :9;1197;422:' 8:;317;185 '780,231' .. U% Other Flnancin Uses' 9.831,358 7 234 20,860,788 7.742,248 7,742,248 n/a Tòtál:E liriditúili,,:&:otbér:Uses..' 17;253;264 :$'16196:362> ' $16;839669' $:nOS9;432< 180 31 .4.6% r Inane"g .o.are City Council City Council expenditures total $142K, which is below the ytd budget total of $I49K by $7K or 4.8%. Savings are due to one- time funding for new programs including: PSRC membership ($24K); ACC participation ($20K); and association dues increase ($7K), none of which has been spent to date. City Manager I" quarter activity totals $168K, and is below the ytd budget of$192K by $24K or 12.5%. One-time funding for new programs of $I46K include: City Newsletter ($46K); Management Analyst Intern ($14,560); Contract Lobbying Services ($50K); and Update City Video ($30K). Only $12K or 8.7% of the total one-time funding has been spent for the management analyst intern and contract lobbyist. Municipal Court Municipal Court expenditures total $377K, which is above the ytd budget of $293K by $84K or 28.8%. The variance is due mainly to higher than budgeted BI contract expenditures which have offsetting revenues. One-time funding of $6K for a filing system to accommodate files transferred tram District Court has not been spent to date. Management Services Management Services expenditures total $438K and is below the ytd budget of$497K by $58K or 11.8%. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs such as: labor negotiations ($15K); recruitment advertising ($I6.5K); OPAC (office proficiency assessment certification) software; document imaging system ($26K); Kronos timekeeping system ($2IK); Eden financial system ($9.5K); web redesign/data conversion ($30K); wellness program ($6.8K); and education assistance ($12K), none of which has been spent to date. Civil/Criminal Legal Activity through I" quarter total $232K, which is below the ytd budget of$382K by $I49K or 39%. Savings can be found in the one-time budgets for: CDBG domestic violence and victim assistance program (20K); outside legal counsel ($79K); and public defender ($48K). To date only less than 1% of the one-time funds has been spent for domestic violence program. Also, only 1.4% t:L( 12 CitvofFederal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial ReDort of the ongoing bndget for outside legal counsel ($84K) and 14.5% of public defender ($249K) has been expended ytd. Community Development Expenditures through I" quarter total $800K, which is $32K or 3.9% below the ytd budget of $832K. Adopted one-time funded programs total $173K of which only 5% has been expended for EDC membership. These new programs include: EDC membership ($8.5K); neighborhood matching grant ($15K); Human Services contract increase ($12.5K); CERT program start-up cost ($4.3K); shoreline inventory ($40K); code amendments ($60K); abatement program ($3K); pemrit process improvement plan reviewer position workstation and computer ($13.2K); and permit process-collectidraftlinterpret non-codified regulations and rules ($I5K). Other one-time funds approved through the carryforward budget adjustment total $397K of which only 12% of the total has been expended for PAA study. These one-time budgeted items include: volunteer program, CERT program, matching funds ($7.5K); employee giving & HS contribution ($44.4K); PAA study ($93K); code amendments ($IOK); citation delivery ($3K); comp plan printing ($3.7K); intern ($4.8K); consultant ($52K); planned action SEPA ($I70K); and EDC web page temp help ($8K). Police Services Police Services have expended $3.92M through I" quarter, which is below ytd budget estimate of $3.96M by $4IK or 1.0%. Since police services budget is largely saIarieslbenefits, lease payments and some supplies, the budget estimate takes this into consideration and excludes one-time funded programs for the monthly budget calculation. Salaries and benefits are below budget estimate, but are offset by overages in overtime, termination pay and supplies. One-time funded budgets total $874K, of which only 7.2% of the totat has been expended to date. These one-time budgets include: traffic school ($3K); explorer program ($5K); state and federal seizures ($30IK); LLEBG & COPS More grants ($337K); temp help for volunteer program ($20K); Building BridgeslWestway ($20K); Reinvesting in Youth ($5K); Narotics K-9 ($5K); AFIS Spillman System Interface ($22K); Mugshot System ($6K); and vehicle, computers and other setup costs for new positions ($15IK Jail Services The table below compares activity through February as March invoices have not been paid. Jail Services is below the ytd budget of$213K by $34K or 16%. The annual budget of$1.34M maybe slightly high when compared to 2002 annual total of$1.07M. Parks and Recreation Parks Operations expenditures through I" quarter total $69IK, which is $I6IK or 18.9% below the ytd budget of$852K. Savings are due largely to one-time funded programs such as: senior program ($25K); continue contract maintenance ($I2.5K); arts commission contracted services ($40.5K); fleet & equipment replacement ($36K); Steel Lake work shed ($15K); Barclay Ridge Trail ($I2K); and facilities repairs & maintenance ($39K). Recreation fee revenues are $I64K or $8.5K (5.5%) above the ytd budget of$I55K. Direct program expenditures total $208K or 12.6% of the annual budget of $ I .6K not including indirect costs. Recreation fees have recovered 78.6% of direct program costs. Including administrative expenditures totaling $94K, the total recreation recovery ratio is 54.0%. Dumas Bay Centre operating revenue total of$I37K is $29K or 26.4% above the ytd budget of$I08K Operating expenditures of $I25K is above the YTD budget of$I 19K by $5K or 4.4%. Knutzen Theatre operating revenue total $2IK, which is $8K or 59.7% [IC) 13 CitvofFederal Wav above the YTD budget of$13K. Total operating expenditure of$48K is $I8K or 62.4% above the ytd budget of$30K. March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort Aquatics Arts & Special Events Youth Athletics Adult Athletics Community Recreation Community Center Recreation Inc Youth Commission Red. White & Blue Senior Services Celebration Park Kenneth Jones Pool Administration l::WrA~RJ;;~EI!c'. " Dumas Bay Centre Knutzen Family Theatre . L~.=.m_~"..ø~n.n. Arts Commission 9.7% 82.7% 67.3% 175.3% 121.1% 30.3% 34.0% 27.8% 60.0% 9.1% 8.9% 51.1% t"!I!.iI!!î\!'.'" , f~....... nla :0.'10'-' Rovo"." do no' ind,de ,<an". in'..." ..min". '" _ating .an,'.... Expanditu'.. do not ind"". ,.,idua' equi~ .an,'... '" oth., int.""nd ",""ibutron,. nla 76.1% 14.9% 308.1% 132.2% 34.3% 63.9% nla nla 31.0% 0.2% nla nla '......... Celebration Park revenues total $107 (concession fees) while operating expenditures total $54.6K. Expenditures are comprised of: personnel costs ($37K); supplies ($6K); utilities ($4K); repairs & maintenance ($2K); other services & charges ($4K) and internal service charges ($2K). Operatin9 Revenue. Concession Fees Transfer-In from Utility Tax 107 220,803 Public Works Operations Expenditures are below I" quarter's ytd budget of$888K by $241K or 27.2%. Savings can be found in various one-time funded programs including: auxiliary generator ($ 11 OK); traffic impact fee analysis ($29K); LED lamp retrofit ($88K); traffic counts ($40K); traffic counter ($6K); workstation, computer and other setup costs for new positions ($32K); color basket/banner start-up costs ($50K); tree replacement ($20K); and CTR ($4.5K). Also contributing to the favorable variance is the timing of contract payments and delayed hiring of the two new positions. The street systems project engineer and senior traffic engineer were hired the beginning of March. Salaries & Benefits Supplies Professional Services LeaseslRenlals Electricity Water & Sewer Repairs & Maintenance Interfund Charges 37.060 5.894 717 2,745 3.696 348 1.904 2,235 f:/"-' 14 Citv of Federal Way March 2003 Quarterlv Financial Reoort Solid Waste and Recycling Operations Expenditures of $66K is below the ytd budget of $78K by $I3K or 15.9%. Savings are attributable to timing of grant programs. The Spring Recycling Event is scheduled for Saturday, April 26th. Surface Water Management Operations I" quarter expenditures of$424K are below the ytd budget of$514K by $90K or 17.5%. Savings can be found in one-time funded programs including equipment ($1 IK) and SWM Inspector vehicle, computer, and other setup costs ($43K), as well as salaries and benefits due to not hiring the SWM inspector until the first part of April. ~. 'h"'."',..' ,n.' d,,'.""'~~" . . ... . . ~ ~. . .. '. "~J~C"",.. .'~ : . " ~...m :"., ""."" , '" ,'..', ' . , ,. "rn'~,,~~c"";"" ...",.-. . "~~'""'=""'"Y"""'~YY_-"""~""",.""-"-""-'~'ey¡;~ ~~--~ """""""""',.MC"'-"""""" .. ... ~"""""~" '~'~"'~""'"" ~~~,...,.w,¡.;;,'~'-"~~-' ,~",.-,-,._~ Contracted Engineering Services I Expedited Plan Review (1) 500 -I 3,934 Neiahborhood Traffic Safety-Private Contract Pavement Marking Maintenance-Private Contract Access Management Retrofits Expedited Plan Review Contracted Enaineering Services NeiQhborhood Traffic SafelY Traffic Maintenance-Kina County Traffic Impact Fee 10,000 15,000 8,000 , 8,000 40,000 360. 1 00 28,667 31.910 Street Maintenance" Private Contractors (2) Street Maintenance - WSDOT Structure Maintenance (3) 247,327 50,036 119,367 Pavement ManaQement System 20,000 I Solid Waste Litter Control 48,250 8,206 Water Utility Billina - KC Watershed Interlocal AQreement State Highway Maintenance - WSDOT Water Analysis Str. Sweepino, Catch Basin,Manhole & Pices ESAlNPDES Gap Anal SIS (including 1 time) 82,053 5,524 20,000 13,877 214,840 15000 6.002 3220 - OOY, nfa - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% nfa 0.0% 0.0% 8.9% 0.0% - - - 0.0%\ 0.0%1 O.Oo/; - 0.0%1 17.0%1 - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 215% - - (1) Expedited plan review service expend~ures have matching revenues. (2) Private Contracts for streets maintenanceltraffic control ($16.687), ROW vegetation, mowing and tree maintenance ($161,000), stump grinding, irrigation services, dangerous tree removal ($10.000), small works projects ($14,000). noxious weed control ($6.000), paving inspection services ($19,640), and tree replacement ($20,000). (3) Private Contractors for sidewalk, ramps. curb and gutter maintenance ($112.696) and fences. guardrails, barriers and retaining wall maintenance ($6,671). t:1í 15 Citv of Federal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoart ^~;rE;^^.,^^ . 'E!æ!lbYtlNVESTMBl'fTS The following table shows the in-house investment activity schedule and their related yields and comparison to benchmark. Per policy, the basis used by the City to detennine whether market yields are being achieved is the range between the average 6 month US Treasury Bill (1.14%) and the State Investment Pool (1.29%). The CUrTent in-house yield is 3.51% which is greater than both benchmarks. Avera e Maturi Avera e Yield to Matu" Average Yield - 6 mo. T-Bill State Investment Pool Avera e Portfolio Maturi & Yield 989 51.535,130 1 da 101 3.51% 1.14% 1.29% 1.81% The total invested balance at the end of March is $57.3M, which includes $51.5M in the state investment pool. The state pool is composed of agency coupons (35%), discount notes (30%), certificates of deposit (13%), treasury securities (11%) and repurchase agreements (11 %). The City's total portfolio is made up 90% state pool and 10% in-house investments. SIP Average Invested Balance by Type March 30, 2003 Total Portfolio by Catøgory March 30, 2003 Certificates of Depos~ 13% n-House >west (Agencies) 10% Year 6 Month T-Bill State Investment Pool In-house Investment Portfolio Avera e t::/8 16 Citv of Federal Wav March 2003 Ouarterlv Financial Reoort DE.l;JTSERVleE The following is a schedute of outstanding debt as of March 31, 2003: Amount Beginning Ending Funding Date of Matority Origioally Outstanding Amount Outstanding Dmri tion P"'PO'" SO"", I"ue Date Int"e" Rate I"ued Debt Redeemed Debt v,""al Vbligalion Hand,.. 1991 Limited & 1993 Refunding Ce]eb""on P"k Acquisition REET I3-May-93 OI-Dec-2I 2.70 - 5.85 12.105,000 11,455.000 11,455,000 1993 Limited Develop Sagha!ie Parl< REET 14-)un-93 01-Dec-O8 2.70-5.70 2,390.000 1,170,000 l.t70,000 1995 Limited T"",sport. & Street Improve Projects lIT Tax 28-Dec.95 OI-Dec-05 3.90-4.75 5,000,000 1,880,000 1,880,000 1996 Limited Tnmsport. & Street Impmve Pmjects lIT Tax 29-Feb-96 01-Dec-05 3.50-4.50 2,500,000 935,000 935,000 Knut"n Theatre, Sportsfields, Downtown t 997 Limited PSFac;;;ty lIT Tax 22-Ap,-97 OI-Dec.12 5.00-5.30 16,150.000 9,915,000 9,915,000 ]999 COPS Pu"h Sl. Mainl. Mower & Dump Truck REET OI-Aug-99 01-)un-04 5.16 184.000 59,936 59,936 Valley Comm (91 I o;spatch}Cente' Bldg 2000 Limited & Eouioment REET I2.S~oo 01-Dec-15 5.31 2,551600 2 327,000 2,327000 Tota! Gene..1 Oh;; tion Debt $ 40,880 600 $ 27741,936 $ $ 27,74t 936 Public Wo,*-, Trust Fund Loan.. 3I-Aug-94, 24-)ul- pwn. SWM CIP-Kitts Com"Pm;ect SWM 96 & O4-SeI"97 OI.)u]-14 1.00 1,555,440 1,034.873 1.034,873 Pwn. SWM CIP-SeaTac Ma!I Detention Pm'. SWM 31-Mav & I4.Au, 01-)ul-19 1.00 1860417 I 634035 I 634035 Subtotal PWfFL 3415857 2,668908 2668908 Gnmd Tota! $ 44296 457 $ 30410844 $ $ 30410.844 Under RCW 39.36.020(2), the public may vote to approve bond issues for general government in an amount not to exceed 2.5% of the value of all taxable property within the City. Within the 2.5% limit, the City Council may approve bond issues not to exceed 1.5% ofIhe City's assessed valuation. Prior to the passage of new legislation in 1994, the statutory limit on council manic (non- voted) debt for general government purposes was 0.75% of assessed valuation. Another 0.75% of council manic debt was available only for Iease-pUIchase contracts (RCW 35.43.200). These two components have now been combined and can be used for any municipal purpose, including using the entire 1.5% for bonds. The City's remaining debt capacity without voter approval is $73M and an additional $59Mcan be accessed with voters approval. The voter approved capacity is generally referred to as unlimited tax general obligation debt, which requires 60% voter approval and the election must have a voter turnout of at least 40% of those who voted in the last State general election. With this vote, the voter approves additional property tax be levied above and beyond the constitutional and statutory caps on property tax. .:.QOIiII>VT:4TIO":O~:~IIiIIT4W11O1'I"'P~I;IT~I'J"~$$:' """,:-",":-:-':-:--:"-:Måi:i;/i:3{20o3::::-'-:-:"-:"," ..' General Purooses Excess Levy Excess Levy Total Councilmanic Excess Levy Open Space Utility Debt DESCRIPTION (Limited GO) (Unlimited GO) and Parl< ~ ~ AV' $5.912,547,524 (A) 1.50% $ 88.688.213 $ (88.688.213) 2.50% 147,813,688 147,813,688 147.813,688 $ 443,441.064 Add: Cash on hand for debt redemption (B) 12,168.788 12.188,788 Less: COPs outstanding (59.936) (59.936) Bonds outstanding (27.882.000) (27,882,000) REMAINING DEBT CAPACITY $ 73,115,065 $ 59,125,475 $ 147,813,688 $ 147,813,688 $ 427,867,916 GENERAL CAPACITY (C) $~ (A) Final 2002 Assessed Valuation. (B) Fund balance as of 3/31/03 of $8.085.925 in debt seNice prefunding balance and $4,082.863 in utility tax fund. (C) Combined total lor Councilmanic, and Excess Levy capacities. In addition to these general purpose debt capacity, RCW 39.36.030(4) also allows voters to approve park facilities and utility bond issues, each limited to 2.5% of the City's assessed valuation. Therefore, legally the City can issue up to a total of7.5% of the City's assessed valuation in bonds for $428M. The table to the left shows the available debt capacity for the City as of March 31,2003. The Public Works Trust Fund Loans are the obligation of the SUIface Water Utility and backed by the rates collected from users thus not considered as the City's general obligation debts nor are they subject to the limitation of indebtedness calculation. The 2003 adopted budget includes using $IOM in excess utility tax to retire the 1993 refunding general obligation bond for the acquisition of Celebration Park. This will reduce the annual debt service to be repaid with REET and will substantially shorten the average life of the City's long-term debts. îlj' 17 Citv of Federal Way March 2003 Quarterlv Financial ReDort GeneiaVSm;Øt:F<in.d, . :-$:-: : 9,588,390' :$::- :-.19;099;24:1 :-$:: :8,'197,351.: .$.. : :1:;90:1:;890: :$:: . .11,467,2:40 DObt:Service:F<ind::(1) :-.5,519,129" :<3,515;Oðð' '.10ea: 71 :-.2,50&,797' . < 81188'925 Special Revenue: Arterial Street 895,572 1,237,226 40,535 1.196.691 1,892,263 Utility Tax (1) 7.872,948 1.792.159 5,582,245 (3.790,085) 4,082,863 Solid Waste & Recyclin9 162.896 117,052 66,084 50,968 213,884 Special Study (Gov. TV) 106,511 321 321 106,832 HoteVMotel Lod9in9 Tax 182,119 89,031 3,629 85,401 267,521 2% for the Arts 28,114 10,840 (10,840) 17,274 CDBG 5,943 50,082 14.591 35,491 41,434 Paths & Trails 51.592 2,266 2.266 53,858 $II~f$'Ø(:iljfRevtiQ~eF~lìd¡;:' . :9;101i,'!J91i.' ';¡.mò1:U' ..1i.:717.92if. . . (-2.4.9ò78'!J)" :-o;'!J:71i.909. Capital Project: Public Safety Facility 7.440,966 16,749 16,749 7.457,716 Downtown Revitaiization 1,031,140 1,031.140 (1,031,140) 0 Unallocated 1997 Bond Proceeds 20,365 20,36S (20.365) (0) Community/Senior Center/Pool 952,846 361 952.485 952,485 Celebration Park 107.908 235 23S 108,142 Park improvements 574.042 776,121 9,411 766,711 1.340,753 Surface Water Management 6,634,716 589.754 106,870 482,883 7,117,600 Trans ortation 8.092.939 1,662,566 1,844,280 (181.714 7,911,225 SùbtotalCaþitafPi:òjOi:./S. .' .: .3,902;077.: ':.3;998;.10 . .: 3.()1:?427:-. . '.985;/14« . :.:24,887;921: Enterprise Funds: Surface Water Management (3) 487,502 143.385 1.005,084 (861,699) (374.196) Dumas Bay Centre Operations 136,946 124,502 12.444 12,444 Dumas Bay Centre Capital 134,712 164,140 64,249 79,891 214.603 Knutzen Family Theatre Capital 103,237 230 230 103,467 Knutzen Fami Theatre 0 rations 120,841 48,122 72,719 72,719 $II~fElìt~":Fùl14¡;':' ..... <:12M51. '::5'!J5ò54;1' .' 1.261;957 . . :(69M14)" ::-:29;.031' Internal Service Funds: (2) Risk Management 4,057,551 165.355 27,088 138,268 Information Systems 1,962,972 377,761 441,523 (63,762) Mail & Duplication 140.528 54,996 44.807 10,189 Fleet & Equipment 2,119,918 306,694 162,984 143,731 Buildin9s & Furnishin s 609,634 105,688 72,608 33,080 $libitiial híìeir>al SiirvleeFlIndS:..: :-:9,¡¡90.~: :-.1;01:0,495:: 748.:990 . .2&1;51J5 . .Jt!viI#i1r~iltcoitlrt¡Jf'!J17iI . :TotafAlfFùnds '. ." .. ... ::$': . : 57,968,305: :$< ..':'22;536;754::$" ': 20.()(}6;919::$ (1) Utility Tax and Debt Service fund balance is reserved for the payment of debt service. (2) Internal Service fund balance is comprised of accumulated replacement reserves for the purpose of fixed asset replacement, with the exception of Risk Management, which is comprised of accumulated reserves for self-insurance and strategic reserve. (3) Ne9ative balance due to timing of transfer out to SWM CIP from SWM Operations. 18 [Z,D ATTACHMENT A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES OPERATING FUNDS rhrough March 2003 10.. - 2003 . ThrO:~h .~. '.:":~~. 'F~"O;;¡b~:ria~~~.;'¡;ì~], 'Ma,""'. '._~,.'. .<pqll~ij,$'::- .P!Ì;çoi)\I'.' $ 24,597,100 $ 24,597,100 $ 0.0% Dparatlng Revenuas P",perty Taxes Sales Tax HotellMotel Lodging Tax Cnminal Justice Sales Tax Inte_emmental Real Estate Excise Tax Gambling Taxes 280,194 2,302,778 174,596 2,441,862 236,678 2,725,697 19,628 397,475 1,192,417 372,877 350,483 1,502,644 442,777 237,889 17,584 61,956 6,308 35,694 112,748 127,962 113,361 14,016 246,594 42,753 125,353 35,890 107,156 33,138 :-:.;~59Þ7.. . 227,344 2,781,314 32,360 428,735 799,755 346,190 555,902 1,735,129 244,948 279,971 19,841 88,553 843 31,552 139,590 132,392 132,223 12,900 292,491 119,076 144,839 36,858 202,317 15,372 t7~M9~: : 261,202 2,644,807 21,805 407,232 820,359 474,664 ' 598,513 'I 1,755,853 216,189 421,439 9,339 ' 64,047 15,252 60,599 163,447 176,878 130,893 18,982 119,531 101,525 130,465 52,725 214,246 24,825 '.g;jø~;.\.: 7,777,226 10,999,574 134,000 1,611,369 3,345,546 1,900,000 1,850,000 7,747,611 1,018,813 1,179,816 302,740 2,897,693 25,074 402,090 776,138 333,549 452,668 1,945,632 267,978 273,242 54,739 88,036 3,934 48,485 150,577 154,914 108,329 12,862 172,966 131,848 142,846 54,486 250,320 22,804 Mn'~': . 302,740 2,743,687 32,590 409,106 753,672 784,124 488,763 1,848,014 365,054 297,510 54,739 124,847 3,934 28,718 172,938 163,377 136,916 20,545 78,429 131,648 142,848 e8,138 162,856 54,370 .<M~M.' 0.0% -5.3% 30.0% 1.7% -2.9% 135.1% 3.6% -15.3% 36.2% 8.9% 0.0% 418% 0.0% -40.8% 14.8% 5.5% 26.4% 59.7% -54.7% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% -34.9% 138.4% ': :0:. (154,006) 7,516 7,017 (22,466) 450,575 16'0951 (297,eI8) 97,078 24,268 36,811 I (19'76~)1 22,360 8,463 28,587 7,684 (94,537) (0) 331,784 1,817,386 365,044 72,669 1,324,059 211,827 133,751 362,640 1,361,096 436,070 292,910 1,415,884 213,770 318,150 12,326 74,877 6,995 e5,703 111,625 139,057 96,012 8,678 290,039 42,120 108,316 37,320 127,230 21,496 :<Ø;1..,ru. . 36,971 369,455 21,555 113,401 106,227 66,010 142,100 621,964 930,450 493,750 69,976 743,621 526,592 3,432,770 165,240 926,082 98,292 :~~7: Recreation Fees Dumas Bay Cent.. Knutzen Family Theat.. Interest Eamings miniCash Management Fees SWM Fees Refuse Co_on Fees Police Services Othe' 101010' 'io\I,;:l!'air!Ì,;",,: 62,498 41,497 63,437 36,501 37,495 174,176 ":7;!IØJ;~f. 13,652 (87,463) 31,566 ':n,"':.:. Operating ExpendRu,e. City Council City Manage, Municipal Court-OperaUons Management Services CiviVCnminal Legal Services Comm. Development Services ponce Services Jail Services Pa"s and Roc..ation Public Wort<s aty Overlay Program o'd Weste oteVMotel Lodging Tax ment 91,659 161,569 98,946 165,533 92,252 132,924 164,412 ~~~:;:; I 742,307 3,104,354 248,142 680,902 709,754 25,534 53,316 587 392,798 102 125,863 37,897 7,ZOe,0O2 I 112,057 161,801 259,514 431,214 282,396 664,096 3,420,599 228,057 629,091 610,910 21,431 75,452 5,763 335,907 10,245 129,993 43,380 7,421,90e 157,169 ~~:~~; ! 444,628 299,675 689,753 3.455.477 221,175 639,170 751,430 24,580 55,516 22,100 : 422.468 , ,~:~~)! 31.003 I 7,833,031 : 260,050 691,203 1,210,569 2,005,360 1,448,586 3,606,322 15,572,132 1,342,000 4,041,628 4,090,497 2,379,347 420,855 367,662 2,198,152 15,630,394 493,786 177,050 '5,935,5" 149,373 192,293 292,716 496,928 381,558 831,618 3,960,068 213,202 852,379 888,456 40,535 78,61e 41,325 514,148 15,271 119,299 29,e38 9,097,422 142,177 188,289 376,962 438,459 232,497 799,544 3,919,267 179,397 691,021 647,062 40,535 66,084 3,629 424,366 15,271 124,502 48,122 8,317,185 7,196 24,004 (84,246) 58,469 149,061 32,073 40,800 33,805 161,358 241,3": I 12,532 37,696 89,782 ., (5,203) 18,484 780,237 4.8% 12.5% .288% 11.8% 39.1% 3.9% 10% 15.9% 18.9% 27.2% 0.0% 15.9% 91.2% 17.5% 0.0% -4.4% -62.4% 8.e~ 352,316 385,855 550,800 2,807,551 125,385 613,582 719,633 82,819 44,484 417,778 422,206 6",174 3,067,137 184,497 619,546 780,171 13,920 45,697 365,486 2,184 93,678 370,528 102 107,110 24,354 7,015,'" e,3O7,101 1,271,785 ! 1,376,589 ! 858,051 j 1,211,140 1,143,073 1,353,02e -3615.8% Othe, Flnanclno Source. Othe, Financing U... 2,822,839 2,034,372 5,381,058 9,253,813 7,230,373 11,425,326 , 0.0% 0.0% Ending Fund Balance Solid Waste Artenal Street UtiilyTax SWM Path & Trai~ Stralegic Reserve Debt Service Dumas Bay Cen"e Police P3 Inte"und Loans Unreserved TolalEndln F""dBalance 294,316 477,375 2,120,030 2,276,459 12,555 2,025,496 5,283,482 13,286 786,441 300,000 10,000 2,31e,181 $ 15915eO, 299,842 349,431 2,830,148 1,643,113 22,353 2,028,204 5,748,508 47,775 748,150 300,000 10,000 822,932 $ 14850 456 196,303 192,137 456,790 715,382 4,944,684 1 e,168,921 812,213 1 500,230 31,474 I 41,84B 2'033'8321 _I 4,561,433 6,505,879 35,745 63,775 800,229 , 604,131 ~:g: I 3~:ggg 1,026,026' 3,000,712 $15208729 $18'03018 71,97¿ I 31, 992,700 ' 60,892 i 3,872,57~ 1 3,465 427,83e ' ~:ggg! 3,886,049 : 9.25$'19>$ 213,864 1,892,263 4,082,863 (374,196)1 53,858 .1 8,085,926 85,184 435'23el 300,000 30,500 7,059,157 ; $>218 63&. nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla . 85Ug, nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla 5,579,129 25,250 ~:~~¿ I 25,DOO 5,075,119 $20 e93 450 .. e-Z-,¡ 04116120D3515PM 03 MFR TABLES.xlsSUMMARY >- :2 >- W '" :!: 0 >- a.. "':2W «0'" a..-", W"'::I O»- "'-« ",O>- "':!:'" 03:>- 3:",¡¡¡ () ., ¡¡¡ ~ ::I a.. a.. ~ '" ~ c ~ c 0 'i;; .;; Õ . ~ ~ ~ 't: .¡¡ w .: if '¡; .¡¡ <i 'S f1. '" 0 ¡¡¡ ~ 0 "' " EH HH HH gh~ :;:e~~ ','!:~~ u""',, c ~Æ ] 6 8§ ~E £"5 ~55 '" ,.; N '" " '" ,.; :g '" .. :3 ~ '" '" N '" '" '" g ~ t- o ~ N ;; N " " t t- '" '" ~ ". ;; ~ Ii ë; ¡!~¡¡¡i;;ii¡ ¡;iij~¡flî!¡jt¡{ ~~c..goo .2~~ E "' UcCiJC ~¡¡._~.--o "' iõj ~i~~. h~l~ ~ h ¡I;~ iHi H;nH ~H~lH~HHHÆHH~H~HH~ U~ :3 õ " z "" z ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ :3 ;¡ ~ 0 0 ;¡ g .. ~ 0 ~ ~ " z * ~ '" '" " z § . . "' n. ~I= 8 '" 0 N 0 ~ ,¡; ~.~ :0'1 -0 c . ~.¡¡, ~Æ .-0 "'. .5.2 c in ~£c iÕu>~ ~ >- ~ 3:'§E. u>w(!!, t j UJ :;:E~ ..0 :;E"' ~a ~H ~ . . u 0 . ~ it ,:]£ g õ .. 0 õ .. ~ .. ~ g :3 ;¡ g ~ ~ ~ ~ :3 ;¡ .. ~ ~ '" 0 § § '5> £ H 'On. 36 ~.~ ~~ E:Z-7.-- <- '" <- ~ <- <- '" ai ::; ~ ~~~!H!o~ ~šHUU;11 i~ E:€H~£.¡;Æ:i:Bg~~g>. ¡;1!~::~ K ~~~~'¡;ID1!~li~.I~I¡~OI~ _I og>o>E-N2~ ~'EE~o~ 0>0 00 ~ln~HH~b~~U~U~~ ~:~ ~ë.g~n~q:¡¡~:K~8-r5.~~ .Bg ]~-g~~~~~~::;~~L~-~'õ:¡~. ~~Q. ~ ..ox"£E~õo~o".2. E~..'~ ~~g> ó¡i~:il~li¡¡:¡¡~o..~DIJI ~;j rn~Hn~H[~ ~sH] nH ~~~ " 0 õ « Z š « Z :; ;¡o « Z :; ~ « Z g ::; « Z ~ « Z " ~ ~ N 0 <- i;1 0 0 .~ Eli- ÆB~ ÆH .H~ j",8 Ë -g '" I ihd I! - .>;E.."E-o j~IJUHH § ~ ~'H~~~ ~ o~-_.'o"o HI~~H~H :;:; ~w:; Eo.ø E .~ E ~ :; .~ ~ ~ § n~ KE - 0 DO -. gSo~oD ~~à'j;:.~ , :; , "ò: 'Õ g> ~ ~ EH~H .~.~;o "'Ii! Æ~h~j g[ -g~~¡n £'" 0= ;:,"~ØM e' Hð8 ~~8 DO '" ~'" 0 N._. N '" <- oo g '" '" N ~ ß ~ , ! I ~ H~ ~ "'If l~t ~ ,~ -g.s~g E oo,;;oõ~" ~ ~BHH ~ ;:"""uEuo ~ ~z.,3 PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC DIVISION PROJECT STATUS REPORT Traffic Signal at SW Dash I 4/96 I 12/02 I 6196 I 10/96 I 4102 I 8/97 I 08/02 I Project complete, I $773,967 I $773,193 Point Road at 8th Avenue SW Design, ROWand Construction S 312'" Street at 8'" I 1/01 I 12/03 I 1101 I N/A 112/02 I N/A I 6/03 I Project is out to bid and opens April I $411,207 I $411,207 Avenue S Signal 29, 2003 Design and Construction S 312'" Street at 14'" I 1/01 3/04 [ 5/01 I N/A I 7/01 [ N/A [10/031 Project is fully funded by City, I $180,000 I $0 Avenue S Signal Working with the engineering consultant on design, Design and Construction S 314'" Street at 23" I 1/01 I 4/04 I 5/01 I N/A I 7/03 I N/A 110/031 Project includes $195,000 CDBG I $210,000 I $0 Avenue S Signal funding. Negotiating scope with consultant. Waiting for authorization Design and to proceed. Construction II "I",lt"fO'OZ,do, \\\ t--.:\ -.C PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREETS DIVISION PROJECT STATUS REPORT 23ld Avenue So Ro,d 8193 12/02 NIA 1100 7/96 12/98 6101 Pmje"w" eornp]"oo by DPK, Inc. 1nJ""u"')'2003. The I 8,470,042 I 8,470,042 bnpmvemen",S03]7!hStto eontmtot h" ,ubnrinoo , $633,337 C]';m fot "¡dihon~ So 324th, ""d So 320th Stre<t eompen"hon. City ,taff ""d Enlt""eo the Eng1neonng do"b]e left turn """, eoo,u1""t on the pmje" ,to p"..nlly "viewoo the documentation ""d tbe v~¡dity ofthe e),im. n"ign, ROWond Co",lro"io, (TEA 2], AlP) , (D"lgnIROWI Con"ru"ion) Sooth32OthSlteot-lIthP]", ]198 ]2/03 1198 NIA NIA NIA NIA The ""et",.. pmjoet w" eomp]etoo. 1,923,930 Sooth to 1-5, Utility The only "oWning item to be eomp]eted on thl, pm]e" i, UndcrglOund ""d Slteet"'pe th, onde¡",ound¡ng of ove¡ h"d uh]iti" wlthln pnv'te (D,,¡gni e"emen" ,long S320th Site" betweon 20' Ave ond ,," Co",truetion) n"ign, ROW ond Co",/ru"¡on Avo. Staff.." in ",goti,tio", wlth PSE fo<the completion C1\ ofthl,wOtk. I P",¡fie Highw..y South HOY 5198 ]2/03 8198 7199 9198 3100 7102 Thi, pmjoe! i, unde¡ '""'truetion. The eonn,etOt i, SCI I 11,983,380 I 1 ],983,380 M ùm"Phase I-So. 312thSneet Inm"tructu", LLC E,hmatoo pmje" ,"mpletion ¡, '-'\ to So. 324!h Slteet nuign, Octobe¡ 2003. ROW o,d Co",lroeh" (D"ignlROWI (TEA 21, TPP) Co",truetion) ""eifie H1ghw,y South HOY 6/00 12/04 NIA 9100 6/00 1]100 5/03 4,309,000 ùm" Phase 11- So. 324th Snoot Thi, pmje" i, ful1y fundoo rOt D"ign, ROW ""d to So. 340th Stre<t n"ign. Co",truetion. The d"lgn ,"",ult"", 1, CH2M Hil1, ]ne, ROW o,d Co",lroeti" Pmj'" eo",truetion i, out to Ad. B1d opening ¡, "hoou]oo (TEA 21, TPP,AIP) foIM..y7,2003 (D"ignlROW) S3241h Slteet " SR99 Pmje" 6100 ]2/03 NIA 9100 6100 JIloo 4/03 Pmjoet i, being wo<ked on in conjunction wlth the ],146,506 (T1A) p",ifie Highw..ySouth HOY ùm" Ph"e I - So. 312th S"eet to So. 324th Slteet pmjoet" ..Ch""ge O,de¡. E"im"ed pmjoet completion i, Octobe¡ 2003. (Con'truetion) 4103 I 12106 I N/A I 4/04 I 12104 I 9/04 I 5/05 I Thi, pwjo" i, fully fundO<! fo, O"ign ",d ROW only. I 3,500,000 I 0.0 Stam "0 in tho pw"" of "Io"ing , oonsult"" fo, tho d"ign ",d tho ROW '<XJui,ition of tho pwjoet (D"ignJROWj 2003 Asph,lt Ov"l,>" I 9/02 Thi'pwJo" i, und",on"""tion. Tho ,ontrncto,is ICOM 2,056,975 M"ori"s. E"imatod "'0;0" oomplotion i, 0"0,",' 2003. D"'gn. Con"","'on S288th Stteo! I 2,939,679 I 645,%0 SR99 to MiIit"'Y Ro"¡ South I 10/01 I 12103 I 10/01 I I/02 I 4/02 I 1/02 I 5/03 I This pwj'<Ot is fundO<! fo, O"ign, ROW ",d Constru,tion. O"ign oonsult",t is CH2M Hill, In'., Pwj"'t,onstruction D"'gn. ROW and Con"","ion I I I i,outtoAd.BidoponingiS"hOdUl0dfO,APri123,2003 I (O"ign& (TIA, HES) ROW) Woy"h",us" W'y ",d S336th \1\ SITW lnt""<Otion 5/01 12/03 5/01 9/01 9/01 I N/A I 8/031 This project is funded fo, Design, ROW,nd I 1,102,880 I 163,700 lm",ov""on" Construction. Consultant is T,anspo Gwup ~ D"'gn, ROWond Con""""on cu"ently working on p,oject final design. Project I I (Oos;gn) construction Ad date is estimated to be July 2003 K,\CIPISTR0403.doc 04/1412003 MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# :z ClJ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Banking Services Contract CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: I2J D D CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: FEDRAC Memorandum and Projected cost analysis for the tenn of the contract. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The CitY's current contract with U,S, Bank for banking services expires June 30 this year. Staff issued an RFP for banking services on March 19th and received seven proposals on April 7"', The proposals were evaluated based on price (50%), ability and service history (40%) and responsiveness to the requests (10%), Three of the seven proposals did not provide investment safekeeping services in their proposal. In each of these three cases, we included the cost of the Statewide Custody Contract for safekeeping by Bank of New York for costing comparison. U.S. Bank provided the overall lowest price of the seven proposals and has demonstrated through this last contract their abilitY to meet our banking service needs. Customer service and responsiveness provided by U.S. Bank in this past four year contact period has been very positive. The CitY will compensate the bank through a combination of fees and interest earnings on funds in the account. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Forward to full Council to authorize the CitY Manager to enter into a four year contract for Banking Services with U.S. Bank. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the motion to authorize the City Manager to enter into a four year contract for Banking Services with U.S. Bank. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .. ~..~ .. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: April 17,2003 To: Finance, Econom.ic De elopment and Regional Affairs Committee Via: David H, Mos anager From: ~chae1 Olson, Duty Director of Management Services Subject: Banking Services Requestfor Proposal BACKGROUND: The City's current contract with u.S. Bank for banking services expires June 30 this year. Stalfissued an RFP for banking services on March 19th and received seven proposals on April 7th from Bank of America, Columbia Bank, HomeStreet Bank, Key Bank, Sterling Savings Bank, U.S. Bank, and Wells Fargo Bank. The proposals were evaluated based on price (50%), ability and service history (40%) and responsiveness to the requests (10%). Attached is the projected cost analysis for the term of the contract, based on proposals received from each of the seven banks. Three of the seven proposals did not provide investment safekeeping services in their proposal. In each of these three cases, we included the cost of the Statewide Custody Contract for safekeeping by Bank of New York for costing comparison. U.S. Bank provided the overall lowest price of the seven proposals and has demonstrated through this last contract their ability to meet our banking service needs. Customer service and responsiveness provided by u.S. Bank in this past four year contact period has been very positive. The City will compensate the bank through a combination of fees and interest earnings on funds in the account. RECOMMENDATION: Stalfrecommends the City to enter into a new four year contract with U.S. Bank. COMMITTEE ACTION: Forward to full Council at the May 6th Regular Meeting to authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with U.S, Bank for a four-year term. k, lfi nancelcfplbank\2003 Ifedmcmemo .doc 1)\ Four Year Contract Cost Comparison Home."..! <"." prorid. full,.""" ' K Ongoing Cumn! Smi"" I ~'~'re~') .=~- '-'~!o ._~!-~. . -_21:_=_-+lli- --i:~~~ ._A"oOOIR..o",i]~ti~nProgmm M"ualJur"'-----.L. .so. -. --=--+- ... - --~ _..J.20... 720---."0 P'drernR'I"rt'd-Onlineb'I"",rep~i. 1.600 ,"':' 7,680,-= -=--=-- . ----=----_-.],072._-,--.. "'-"':.£8",,: -= 7,68Õ. £;ii.~-=rq-{t;--':- ?"Ë '~~=.:..k,::,,~ Ic~ ~~E[:;,,~===-= - ~L~ ...'..,- ;{i¡-=4~-=~__~:~~r~-=-~1~:~=~~~ì=. ':~ -::::;::: ::::'. \':~:::I--==1:{r '::: -'::: '-':¡¡ -"*.. ':;:- ';;';':1t =!:~~¿tê::~ . ~~ )Ì:- -:- :.~:: ,~-= :::È _~'~:T~ :':~¡ '- ---=~2r- -~ :':~-- -::1~ _S~P'ymon"-M"ual I I 480 ].200 240 -'.0~+-_960 ---, . 480, _38. ,..I",,~"""""p,,\t'm,ho'g'onCD 750 1,440' 18,000 1,2<;<J__-, 1,800__DJ80 -2,16tJ _I""!!,,,,""mmonthly,h..... I 1,920 1,200 1,200 IJOO 1,920 ha.dPme.... ' " --- -.........~- "'. ,-0. -- '--- ""'r ';00' - ",00'-- . {~~~i","- -==ìr,--;;~~-3n ,.:; ==c,ic=:i ~_:;~~.; -"'!\Wore M,'n"..n" (B,I"" R,porting) I 4.56tJ ' 1,200~ 478 -, --"60 . 1,680 M,inlTomrinol Wire Modul, I' 480 720 1,680 Xcii T""adi.. -- ------,- I F,dR,,"vodACHCredii 20 - -.8[__- 48 ---- - 144': --- FodR..,'vodACHDebii 5 12 , " ]6 ACH Ori";;;,;'dQ;;-U-š í¡';';-- 2~, 96 60 60 144 96 -lAC¡Ù'yroll -",ing . I day S,rt]"",n! 2 480 -~-- - - -- 480 - : 960: ACIIOrigin",d F,d lrem 85"-- - -- ],264 I 2,040 -- _2,040 4,'96 4,~'~ ACHretnm'rem; 5 -- --,,", __..i8O 480, ACH Fil'" (F"",,Proioction) 2 __96tJ 1,440' -- ACH'M"nten';"~--- I 1,20<J__- --- 720-' Ca,p""" ",dO ,ani I CrewIC,"',nnualf';;-------- 200 ~ M~:~;~~;~:;, ni Conn"tlSnm - -- 2 ':'=-J'~;] == 2,:80 CrewtC'nl,di"ooolf~% --- ,- 25,000 ]9.72'-",'_--'4.9.6tJ___19,O80 Credll C",", d"'oootf,~,wi -$ ---~- ]<JO -L, 2,~8() -. ],024 Credi¡C.;;¡;di"~""'-¡""o",d.% 11,000 i 9,157 i4,414~11,563 CredllC."',"'"oootf..""",,-.$-- ""--__'64 'u 1;382 --Cred¡t-¿,';¡'-wsc~""¡¡"t'n"t % 200 ]67 251 210 -Cred;tC';;¡"di,,~;.ntinremo!$ 8 19 Sa¡""p¡.g ";;';;;';;0""(;;;;;;"- I 4.'00 S,f,k.. in M.turiti,~C.ll, I ]84 ]'4 S,f,k in Inmtmon§ottl"",';¡,(oYD:."'d' - 1 576 576 Ovenlraft Pr.""",. 1,92<J 96 24 120 96tJ 4,OSO 540 480 1,,20<1 1,440 1,400 u- 75°- 2,592 - ],264, u-- 2I,36tJ 18,]20 ],45~ _~,880 12,<J]8 11,9]] - 1,382 ';72'" _219 228 92 134 ------"'-00 ~--- i,44'- 2.4()() 2'400_. 96tJ 13.889 --4,028 --,,472.,- - 1,200 _1,200 (64,'00) (69,000) 119 1,152 (71,400) 1699 -2:361 ------,4,028 1.296 - 1,296 --- 960 (70,800)~-- (70,'00) (75,000) 1 I 18 15 .. 960 (70.'00) 13 . -----~ 225 ~~~!:F~~=-m ~~ 1- -- 555 (I~~r- ---l~~; (4,726) 216 14118 15 K~INANCE'RF""'ANK"OO3IRFPprid'g" 4 y,. T". 1)3 ""12003 Four Year Contract Cost Comparison Qt~:=",,-==-_.. -. -- 1- ~35';;;=-~-::O~--~~ .0 0:='0:- C°'l'o"I"",di",roin""""'" I 0 0,16 0,16 0,1224 6A%+.l'ri"", 7.4%+Prim<'- I'ri"",+2%- ~i~i~- ...I~~~f(rj~;~4~= .1-. .,~i~:~J~ :z.E:m ,.. , , . Cí"?'" . .~. .,...L, -&----'¡'=-,FU¡=+ ~=hL :[~~~J-.J==~~t. ~--1~1~~ =-"'-"--'-"~~=f= -c ~ -.. '-".:= Fe ...' =~ --B-1; -=i- -:.:=;~~B ' Contmotl,"g",g'modifio;ti~n . f<. Dœ,"ot"rify '0 'topP'ymon,,";, 0 . --' 0 . L"ngwog'to'" ACHtmn",,'on, "",",o",bl,prio, . I mu,""l1y City to in;;," no'«"; ,,«ptablo ,nd""y"',ddl I ,,',k«ping' only I ,b",don 1,« to ",o'fy , 1""PO",ibl"ill ' Idi"","iono' ,;:~':.,";::~in 'I' ,.~::~~I;::mg I ~::~~:::~ "IDeontm" &om" b,w June 3112006'1 Doo,notpw,,;d, ,n'glig,n«. R,qui""1 ,(Typo??) I 1=--" ¡ 1 I~~=- I I§T .+---i8P~4P';¡;diy,JMilabl'~,,_"" =,I~""", ~ ..'" 'I=~,. , >",Iday I~q"¡re, 'w/og"",n", ¡W/Og"",at« ,'°'1 day. Colwnbi, Onlin'l I II day win ~~::;:~ti,þbki?- '10-+- oba" ' l'aywl1 !'we",ing ""yon« day, ACHFil", -'0----- Ifil"'O""";'w K~'NANCEIRFP\BANK~OO3IRFPpri""p. 4 Y=Too' yL/ 4/>712003 Four Year Contract Cost Comparison CO"""", C"d F""d A~,il'bili ,-~ ~"", ¡fliWm"¡C.",W...-nSf ' So",';" Ch"g, S"tI"",", (=x) "~X Fin' R,q, "'",d "x"k<xcd!'"", W'i'" d i" '"d;,;,h", """"'O"" 1 IfiI;¡;;;~'f"""-¡O- ~d'mi,",p'" , i"m"olifi""", , If" by 10 'm I ;~" by 2.00 1 w,n, F. 0 ',._--'",-",-- -, Po,iû" P'Y ---'. 0 10 I IW¡;,O";;;¡- °'''" "q"i", ,"'W "'O"", b,""""d ,od I"'W ,hook b, prim,d, . I;i:~::: 1ro,"",&,om "'gi>mi"g " -,,- ,0 0 Mo"",ly/Qw"'dy AM"""d,biti,,,d" A"nwl Opûoæ. °' Annwl ".-ryfiwd to n,xI ~nlhly, ...~~=~.....-"-' I ' r,S'f""¡;ingl;Ë:-:-I""'~ ~!;.Ë~ ~' 'I~~:~ , , ~n",]yin"m" "'M"', B,," b'""i~g "M" mil,b], "', ml'=1 ------+, '-I" :~:~~d.i/'" I ~";.~~:'"" "ii, ~Ol ;¡,ecifi'd~~~:::~nl .1 ~~~~:~~;~:n ,', ~~~~~& wi", I' ~~p~~:~:- I b']'"""',BOA (mil,b"45 ""°""'""0",, info(0"lin'24'n,]y'i","0"" ""n",'ion, Di=tIT"""", ""y'),""n,f,, ,nd",i"'",,"', ~n""),,,op, I""n'f""'tw"n ,h"ki=g', I "Di""(W'b)iCC"fundbIWO""',¡ I,K'YTO",]T"""""idi""P"""""t(to,"'O""",¡,uS",v¡'in"=t "',BOACCIS; "",w"n"n,d I ,,""mil,b" 45 "nJpty),po,iri" B'"" Wi" "q"¡'" 1"report "'x ,=il in'I"k i=g' , "">"iin"",,"y. ,p'Yid,po""lip& ,CoM,,""æCEOb",i"'" ,do"', ,top",y (ly",),ACH, """h,d" I ,tmt on CD ROM. 'W,b, Ox", po,"" "'x mod"" "BiIIPXY' Slop "û"',i"""i"d, "C'","]""h"k" '1""mion.5,,"y, , px"""n'@ ,CC ""=,ûon "O, ,],."""b],o" ,"n,,"roIlS,,"y, I I I?-:::III'-- I-" §f;1 ~~:,';;',ë"di,-,,-xring ',- -,- ""+1' ""-tI:E~:~~I,rBB+'~I:^ --~::::':-,:::.,,- r""'f""M' .:~='~;rongh I I AI"""",toCompB,];",,--' -+' ~s;."" 'SW"""";;-";'llò --f'~~IO--- .ICo~l° :;:;,~u" @1.44%i~n'y ,m""i,ipxl 1 @,49%ilnto"," '=,k"f""d I linw,to""O""' " I=x~" ] ]4~ 1@1.24% I (F,dfund+,25% if ' , .,. , o",SlOi I I ,F,dfund+,35%if , ow,SI5), KWINANCEIRFPIBANK"O03IRFPPri""",,k4 Y'$T.., l)iS 4/1712003 Four Year Contract Cost Comparison Horn..'....' (coo" p_de rull omtee , NA__- 0 WelU F. 0 Du"..nding- , 'Sah.¡"tory ,-- Du"taod",!!. ° No p.pe' report. Internet b.nking. 00 Hne me"h.ot o ,.."ApriI2003, Po.iti..p.y trnn~"iond'ta;¡ I E"";¡.dvi,, i",n.mitby3.0Opm;"",;¡.bJdo,I3' "",;¡.biHty, if not ¡di"rep.n,y montb" downIo.ded in 9O reported by noon .ddihon.] pe' IdaY""1'ort"nnot 2ndday "",¡", b'reere",d, ' '."'b" $'mIce, "",,"""""'YII#<#, F """, IntemetG"'w.yF" '" A. 30/mo - - IS.OO' - - E~~: :: ~:=t- . ,'.,1-=::5 -:cc. i~~ l'-::' -~f¿:~~1:~~:;an,e_- -,- -- -, T ,,", i-~'-~~ ", :, ,- - " :',,',', fu-' -,:'_,Ô:i2 " , ", -~",U_-, : ;:r~" - -~---- I~ ~ , ~--:- - -~Z~-~'- - -: -i-___- :-:.:_"::neg~t;'¡'d ~U:I _:-::-- :;:?'","1:'.":::~'~- 1:- ,;". --~-I--- ~t_' _uri - '1- ,:~ ¡~::~}~iB,~~~~]~=F~=+=E,- : .". I~_:i-~;:E, - :-t, --, ~'~;' =-:-..:- , :~u,-' ~.~ Ch"kl",,;,R~p"rel.tiOn'hip~ - I - -,---=------- --'.5.00 - u--- - I 15.00, ,,~,~,,~,~,;,~,~,~igf~:::,:,~~~,-,P,_o,u;;;g,d'¡¡¡I'P,,~te"'-. '--! !~~:--,-,-,#', ---~',.".'.,_L,',~,.-~,~, ' -~--,,-',',',',,',-,-,,=.,-,,',," ~F".-.-.~..~.~.2. ~;~~:;;~:i,";:::n~~:~~- u_~-----=-- - - ----=-1ó: -- -- --- .---- - - u---=- _K.TTP""io",O.yl"p<>rtingP"Chont , 10.000 -, --- ---- " KTTPrevio",O.~/CWTentO.yDe~;¡P"'t'm , ; ----. I - 0.040 --un, -' '- u KTT C=entO'l Reportmgpe,CH,nt ,- ~- ,c----- ]0.000 ------, i- , (TTReturnIturnR'1'ortpe!,Çli",tpe>'Montb -"~--om ]0.00°.,... --' '----, Kg~~:::~:n~::~:~~;pe>'Aoo~unt .1-- . -, --,.-=-= -=[.~",.:~.,..--',--, _=,-3I,.~,',00,"_,I,--_'", ~,-,:.".~-.-"-_. KTTBAIReportpetMontb -----,--- -----,15.ooo,-------- - _Aooo";;r;'",¡eton-linepe,"""&;' , nota"i",bl.. - I -' - ---l..00 ---'--:-, ---- -----:: Stop P.yment-on Hne not ".,JabJ, 600 ~~¡I¡~ - ~':I ;:"':~-- -~ -' , --A;d~'¡;'iRe'on"h.honl'.rti;;¡¡;";MontbP"Aoo,-,- -----1,,----,' Mini""""i¡pe;-'temi.]e" tlum 2°'00, -====t== ~~æ¡::t:..~ ."".~ ~......... K~[NANCE\RFPlBANK~OO3\RFPprid"g,[, 4 Y= To.[ v<o 4nmOO3 MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# .JZ(£) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2003 Interloeal Agreement for Waterfowl Managcment Program CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORÐJNANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Rcq'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee action form dated April 14, 2003; 2003 Interlocal Agreement for Waterfowl Management Program -"" -"--"-"-- "-" _MMM --------"----"-"-"-"-""""""-"""""-""""""""""""" -" "-"-" " - _M -- -- "" """-"""""""""""""""""-""""""" " - --- -- "-"-"""""""-""-"-" " SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Canada Geese populate the beach at Steel Lake Park and in Celebration Parks wetlands and sports fields. The geese increase our cost to manage the parks and pose a health and safety risk to the park user. Some of the most measurable impacts arc the increased labor costs to keep the beaches and picnic areas clean, risk to the water quality of Steel Lake for swimming and pose a threat to the success of the wetland plantings are a few exampIes.The most significant tool to manage the Canada Geese population is the InterIocal Agreement for Waterfowl (Canada Goose) Management Program. The purpose of this agreement is to provide the joint funding to contract with thc WildJifc Scrvices Program of the V.S, Department of Agriculture (WS) to manage the Canada Geese population within King County, The plan win include an egg addJing program, lethal control, population monitoring and census: mainly of Canada Gecse, within King County, The City's contribution win be limited to $2,930. The term of this Agreement is from January ], 2003 to December 3],2003, CiTYCOUNCïicóMMiTTEEïŒcoMMËNriATióN;App~o~~ihe 2003 InterIocal Agreement for Waterfowl (Canada Goose) Management Program and forward to fun Council at the May 6 meeting for consideration to authorize the City Manager to execute the InteIocal Agreement. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the 2003 InterlocaI Agreement for Waterfowl Management Program as presented." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLEnlJ BY CITY CLERKS OFnCEj COUNCIL ACTION: 0 API'ROVED COUNCIL HILL # 0 DENIED 0 TAßLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND REA])]NG (ordinances only) 1 ST reading Enactment reading OR])]NANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.G CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: April 14,2003 PRHSPS Council Committee Kurt Reuter, Park operations~perintendent David Moseley, City Manage Ii' 2003 Interlocal Agreement for aterfowl Management Program Back!!xound Canadian Geese populate the beach at Steel Lake Park and in Celebration Park wetlands and sports fields, The geese increase our cost to manage the parks and pose a health and safety risk to the park user. Some of the most measurable negative impacts are increased labor costs to keep the beaches and picnic areas clean, reduced water quality at Steel Lake for swimming, and destruction of wetland plantings. The most significant tool to manage the Canadian Geese population is the InterIocaI Agreement for Waterfowl (Canada Goose) Management Program. Ten cities in King County along with the University of Washington, U.S.D.A. Wildlife Services, and the U,S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Services make up the Oversight Committee to manage this program. The City has participated in this program for the past two years, PurDose The purpose of this agreement is to provide the joint funding to contract with the Wildlife Services Program of the U,S, Department of Agriculture to manage the Canada Geese population within King County. The plan will include an egg addling program, lethal control, population monitoring and gathering census data on Canada Geese, within King County. Scope of prol!ram 2003 will be the eleventh year of an egg addling program and the fourth year utilizing "lethal control". In addition, educational programs will be conducted to inform the public about urban Canada Geese and the associated health and safety problems, Responsibilities Each party, represented on the Waterfowl Management Committee will share in the ongoing review of the programs carried out by WS. Compensation The City's contribution will be limited to $2,930, The amount paid in 2003 was $3,400. The reason for the cost reduction is that one additional city was added to the program. Term The tenn of this Agreement is from January 1,2003 to December 31, 2003. Deliverables WS will make every effort to conduct an egg-addling program on 2,000 - 2,500 eggs. Lethal control will be implemented as necessary and total numbers will be established by the V,S. Fish and Wildlife Service Penni!. Participants will receive a report on the number of eggs addled and geese euthanized in 2003, Committee Recommendation: Approve the 2003 Interlocal Agreement for Waterfowl (Canada Goose) Management Program and forward to full Council at the May 6 meeting for consideration to authorize the City Manager to execute the Interloeal Agreement. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REI'ORT: ~ - 0 J...--.-- ~~ mittee Ch ir ~~mber. C mi ember (;-\ For Your Action 2003 Interlocal Agreement for Waterfowl (Canada Goose) Management Program Please Note: Final Form Ready for Your Submittal for Signature and Funding Authorization n: llaffolp \db \ w...ñw I \agrcemnt 1Intor2000 DRAFT 1+(2?-/03 2003 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR WATERFOWL (CANADA GOOSE) MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34.040 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act) pennits local government units to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities on a basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services in a manner pursuant to forms of government organization that will accord best with recreational, park and natural resources and other factors influencing the needs and development oflocal communities and WHEREAS, the various agencies, cities, counties, Washington State and agencies of the Federal Government listed in Exhibit A - Page 6 of this Agreement, desire to manage waterfowl, especially Canada Geese; and WHEREAS, all parties require assistance ITom the Wildlife Services Program of the u.s. Department of Agriculture, to reduce negative impacts on water quality, minimize resource damage, ensure safety ITom disease for park visitors, and enhance other property managed; and WHEREAS, information dating to a 1989 Waterfowl Research Project done by the University of Washington and current data indicates a large surplus of geese and other waterfowl species in the greater Seattle area; and WHEREAS, this program will be an ongoing resource management activity attempting to maintain a manageable number of birds on a year-to-year basis; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein, it is mutually agreed as follows: SECTION 1 - PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to provide joint funding for an egg addling program, lethal control, population monitoring and census; mainly of Canada Geese, within King County, This program will assist each party in maintaining and managing public and selected and approved private sites that are impacted by a surplus of waterfowl. .: llaffoop \db \ waterfwl \agreemnllIntcr2000 2 SECTION IT - SCOPE OF PROGRAM Wildlife Services (WS) will receive funds fTom each participating member for the continuation of an egg addling program, lethal control and evaluation during spring and summer 2003. Using best management practices WS will carry out an egg addling program, seeking as many accessible nesting areas as possible and will make every effort to minimize damage to the surrounding environment. WS will also implement a program of "lethal control" as requested by the Waterfowl Management Committee, subject to the terms and conditions of a permit to be issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This will be done on a case by case basis in situations where an over population of Canada geese may result in an impact on human health and safety, such as potable water contamination, bird aircraft strikes, disease transmission or other situations as determined by WMC members. Agency and corporate participants acknowledge by approval signature (below) that their participation includes a request to WS for direct assistance through the removal of Canada geese, and will rely on the experience and expertise ofWS to identify locations where goose removal is appropriate. Participants may identify locations where control is not to be carried out. Approved by: for Agency Date: WS will provide an annual report to the members of the WMC which will include information regarding egg addling, the general location of nests and number of eggs addled, number of geese removed, difficulties encountered and whatever other information would be valuable to the WMC. . 2003 will be the eleventh year of an egg addling program and the fourth year utilizing "lethal control". All methods and tools utilized to accomplish addling and "lethal control" activities in 2002 will again be used in 2003. A census of urban Canada Geese will be conducted during 2003, however as in 2002 these census counts will be expanded using stafffTom local agencies and participants at times and places to be specified. Where possible, educational programs will be initiated to inform the public about urban Canada Geese, the associated problems, and the efforts of this committee at addressing those problems. SECTION ill - RESPONSmILITIES Each party, represented on the Waterfowl Management Committee, as shown on Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein, will share in the ongoing review of the programs carried out by WS. Each party agrees that if necessary, an Oversight Committee will be appointed to monitor and report back to the general committee on a regular basis, Three members of the Committee will make up the Oversight Committee chaired by the City of Seattle representative. SECTION IV - COMPENSATION The total cost of the 2003 waterfowl management program shall not exceed Thirty eight thousand, five hundred dollars ($38,500). Each party shall contribute to the financial costs ofthe program as shown in Table 1. SECTION V - TERM AND EXTENSION The Term of this Agreement is from January 1, 2003 to December 31,2003, This Agreement may be extended in time, scope or funding by mutual written consent from all parties referenced herein. SECTION VI - TERMINATION This agreement may be unilaterally terminated by any of the parties referenced herein or Wildlife Services upon presentation of written notice to the Oversight Committee at least 30 days in advance of the severance date shown in Section V. Should termination of this agreement occur without completion of the egg addling, each party shall pay only its' pro rata share of any expenses incurred under the agreement at the date of the termination, and each party shall receive copies of all products resulting from the addling activities up to the time of the termination. SECTION VII - DELIVERABLE Wildlife Services will make every effort to conduct a 1,000-2,000 egg addling program, Field conditions or changing conditions may increase or decrease these numbers. Lethal control will be implemented as necessary and the total numbers are established by the u.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Permit. 2003. Participants will receive a report on the number of eggs addled and geese euthanized in 4 SECTION VIII - FILING As provided by RCW 39.34.040, this agreement shall be filed prior to its entry and force with the City or County Clerks of the participating parties, the County Auditor and the Secretary of State, and, if found to be necessary, with the State Office of Community Affairs as provided by RCW 39.34.120, SECTION IX - LIABILITY Each party to this agreement shall be responsible for damage to person or property resulting ftom the negligence on the part of itself, its employees, its agents or its officers. No party assumes any responsibility to another party for the consequences of any act or omission of any person, firm, or corporation not at party to this agreement. 5 EXHIBIT A WATERFOWL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE PARTICIPANTS City of Bellew e.........................................,.....,..,.,..,..,. """""""""""""""""""""""" Pat Harris City of Federal Way......... """""""'" """ """"""'" .................. ...............KurtReuter City of Kent............................."......,.......... .......,...........,..., ".......,....,.RickWeiss City of Kirkland......,.,...,.......".,..,.,.,....,..........,......... .,............,..,.....,..,..,..............,Mark Johnston City of Mercer Island ............................,.............,....,...............,..,..,.........,.................Greg Brown City ofMountiake Terrace """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"..,............."..,Don Sarcletti City of Redmond.......,............."........,.,.......,.......... ........,........................................ Teresa Kluver City of Renton """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"......................,...Terrence Flatley City of Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation .............................................Barbara DeCaro City of Seattle Department of Public Utilities............. ...........................................Mike Bonoff City ofWoodinville......... """""""""'" ..,.............................. ...... .........BrianMeyer University of Washington """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..,.....Charles Easterberg U.S,D.A. Wildlife Services, .........,..................... """""""""'" ...Mike LinneI/Kee1 Price US.D.l. Fish and Wildlife Service ............................................................................Brad Bortner 6 TABLE I AGENCIES City of Bellewe City of Federal Way City of Kent City of Kirkland CONTRIBUTIONS 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 4,600 City of Mercer Island City ofMountlake Terrace City of Redmond City of Renton City ofWoodinville Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation Seattle Public Utilities University of Washington TOTAL 4,600 2,930 $38, 500 All checks will be made payable to the USDA-APlllS-ADC, eannarked for the Wildlife Services and sent to the following addresses: Mr. Roger Woodruff State Director -Wildlife Services Program U.S. Department of Agriculture 720 O'Leary Street Northwest Olympia, Washington 98502 (360) 753-9884 In case of procedural questions regarding this project, please contact: Maggie Rayls, Administrative Officer Wildlife Services Program (360) 753-9884 FAX: 753-9466 For questions regarding implementation of control measures and census, please contact: Keel Price (360) 337-2179 SECTION X - SEVERABILITY ..Ifany section of this agreement is adjudicated to be invalid, such action shall not affect the validity of any section so adjudged, 7 This agreement shall be executed on behalf of each party by its authorized representative. It shall be deemed adopted upon the date of execution by the last so authorized representative. This agreement is approved and entered into by the undersigned county and local government units, university and other private parties. City of BeUevue By: Patrick Foran, Director of Parks and Community SelVÎces Date: City of Federal Way By: David IL Moseley, City Manager Date: City of Kent By: John Hodgson, Director Date: City of_Kirkland By: David Ramsey, City Manager Date: City of Mercer Island By: Rich Comad, City Manager Date: City of Mountlake Terrace By: NamelI'itle: Date: _City of Redmond By: Rosemarie Ives, Mayor Date: City of Renton By: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Date: City of SeaTac By: Calvin Hoggart, City Manager Date: CityofWoodinvilIe By: DonaIdD, Rose, City Manager- Date: King County By: Craig Larsen, Director of King County Parks System Date: Seattle Department ofParl<s and Recreation By: Kenneth R Bounds, Superintendent Date: Seattle Public Utilities By: Chuck Clark, Managing Director Date: University of Washington By: Karen VanDusen Director of Bnv. Health & Safety Date: 8 MEETING ])ATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUnJECT: King County Developmental Disabilitics Grant CATEGORY: nUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL nUSINESS 0 ORDINANO: 0 PUnLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount nudgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committcc action form datcd April 7, 2003; King County Developmental Disabilitics Grant SUMMARYffiACKGROUND: The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Dept. would like to renew our Interlocal Agreement with King County Community and Human Services Department/Developmental Disabilities Division, This would aI1ow us to receive funds for our Horticulture and Swimming and Fitness programs, which are geared toward people with developmental disabilities in the Federal Way area, Our department would receive $2, I 00 for the period of service bctwecn now and Junc 30, 2003. ,"",,","",", """,""""""".""""""""""""""""""",""""" ,""""""m, ","", " """,," ",,","m"" """" m"" """ "" , CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMEN])ATION: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to accept this agrecmcnt and to place this itcm bcforc City Council on May 6, 2003 for approval. PROPOSE]) MOTION: "I move approval of the King County Developmental Disabilities Grant as presented," CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETE)) BY C1TY CLERKS OFnCE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 AI'I'ROVIW 0 ])ENIED 0 TAnLE])/DEFERRE])/NO ACTION 0 MOVE]) TO SECON]) REA])JNG (ordinances only) COUNCIL nILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.C CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: April 7, 2003 PRHSPS Council Committee Mary Faber, Recreation and ~~tural Services Coordinator David Moseley, City ManageI'\) \II' King County Developmental Disabilities Grant Back!!round: The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Dept. would like to renew our Interloca1 Agreement with King County Community and Human Services DepartmentlDeyeiopmenta1 Disabilities Division, This would allow us to receive funds for our Horticulture and Swimming and Fitness programs, which are geared toward people with developmental disabilities in the Federal Way area, Our department would receive $2, I 00 for the period of service between now and June 30, 2003. This is an opportunity for the City to help servc low-income families and promote health, fitness and wellness. Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to accept this agreement and to place this item before City Council on May 6, 2003 for approval. c..-\ ~~f1 Qft~ôJ King County Contract No. Federal Taxpayer ID No. 0325400 91-1462550 Department/Division Community and Human ServiceslDevelopmental Disabilities Division Agency City of Federal Way Project Title Developmental Disabilities Contract Amount $ b1QQ Fund Code 0107 Contract Period From: January 1, 2003 To June 30, 2003 KING COUNTY AGENCY SERVICES CONTRACT - 2003 THIS CONTRACT is entered into by KING COUNTY (the "County") and CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, whose address is P.O. Box 9718. Federal Wav, WA 98063-9718. (the "Agency"). WHEREAS, the County has been advised that the following are the current funding sources, funding levels and effective dates: FUNDING SOURCES FUNDING LEVELS EFFECTIVE DATES COUNTY FEDERAL Federal Catalogue No. 84.181 STATE $2,100 January 1 to June 30, 2003 TOTAL $2,100 and WHEREAS, the County desires to have certain services performed by the Agency as described in this Contract, and as authorized by Ordinance No. 14517. This form is available in alternate formats for people with disabilities upon request. City of Federal Way Page I of 18 t. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the parties hereto, the parties covenant and do mutually agree as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Agency shall provide services and comply with the requirements set forth hereinafter and in the following attached exhibits, which are incorporated herein by reference: ~ ~ ~ ¡¿;;¡ 0 D D D II. Certificates of Insurance/Endorsements 504fADA Assurance of Compliance General Requirements Family Support Community Service Grant Attached hereto as Exhibit I Attached hereto as Exhibit II Attached hereto as Exhibit III Attached hereto as Exhibit IV Attached hereto as Exhibit Attached hereto as Exhibit Attached hereto as Exhibit Attached hereto as Exhibit DURATION OF CONTRACT This Contract shall commence on the 1st day of Januarv 2003, and shall terminate on the 30th day of June 2003, unless extended or terminated earlier, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Contract. III. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT A. The County shall reimburse the agency for satisfactory completion of the services and requirements specified in this Contract, payable in the following manner: Payable monthly upon submission of required reports in accordance with terms and conditions expressed in this contract, including attached exhibits. B. The Agency shall submit an invoice and all accompanying reports as specified in the attached exhibits not more than 10 working days after the close of each indicated reporting period. The County will initiate authorization for payment after approval of corrected invoices and reports. The County shall make payment to the Agency not more than 45 days after a complete and accurate invoice is received. C. The Agency shall submit its final invoice and all outstanding reports within 1 days of the date this Contract terminates. If the Agency's final invoice and reports are not submitted by the day specified in this subsection, the County will be relieved of all liability for payment to the Agency of the amounts set forth in said invoice or any subsequent invoice. IV. OPERATING BUDGET When a budget is attached hereto as an exhibit, the Agency shall apply the funds received from the County under this Contract in accordance with said budget. The Agency shall request prior approval from the County for an amendment to this Contract when the cumulative amount of transfers among the budget categories is expected to exceed 10% of City of Federal Way Page 2 of18 the Contract amount. Supporting documents necessary to explain fully the nature and purpose of the amendment must accompany each request for an amendment. V. INTERNAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM The Agency shall establish and maintain a system of accounting and internal controls which complies with applicable, generally accepted accounting principles, and governmental accounting and financial reporting standards. VI. MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS A. The Agency shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, financial, and programmatic records and other such records as may be deemed necessary by the County to ensure proper accounting for all Contract funds and compliance with this Contract. B. These records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years after termination hereof unless permission to destroy them is granted by the Office of the Archivist in accordance with Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 40,14, C. The Agency shall inform the County in writing of the location, if different from the Agency address listed on page one of this Contract, of the aforesaid books, records, documents, and other evidence and shall notify the County in writing of any changes in location within ten (10) working days of any such relocation. VII. AUDITS A. If the Agency expends a total of $300,000 or more in federal financial assistance and has received federal financial assistance from the County during its fiscal year, it shall have an independent audit conducted of its financial statement and condition, which shall comply with the requirements of GAAS (generally accepted auditing standards); GAO's Standards for Audits of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions; and OMB Circular A-133, as amended, and as applicable. The Agency shall provide a copy of the audit report to each County division providing financial assistance to the Agency no later than six (6) months subsequent to the end of the Agency's fiscal year. The Agency shall provide to the County their response and corrective action plan for all findings and reportable conditions contained in their audit. When reference is made in their audit to a "Management Letter" or other correspondence made by the auditor, the Agency shall provide copies of those communications and the Agency's response and corrective action plan. B. If the Agency is a municipal corporation, it shall submit to the County a copy of its annual report of examination/audit, conducted by the Washington State Auditor, within thirty (30) days of receipt, which submittal shall constitute compliance with subsection VilA C. Additional audit or review requirements which may be imposed on the County will be passed on to the Agency and the Agency will be required to comply with any such requirements. VIII. EVALUATIONS AND INSPECTIONS City of Federal Way Page 3 of 18 A. The Agency shall provide right of access to its facilities, including those. of any subcontractor to the County, the state, and/or federal agencies or officials at all reasonable times in order to monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. The County will give advance notice to the Agency in the case of fiscal audits to be conducted by the County. B. The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Contract shall be subject at all times to inspection, review, or audit by the County and/or federal/state officials so authorized by law during the performance of this Contract and six (6) years after termination hereof, unless a longer retention period is required by law. C. The Agency agrees to cooperate with the County or its agent in the evaluation of the Agency's performance under this Contract and to make available all information reasonably required by any such evaluation process. The results and records of said evaluations shall be maintained and disclosed in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17. IX. CORRECTIVE ACTION If the County determines that a breach of Contract has occurred, that is, the Agency has failed to comply with any terms or conditions of this Contract or the Agency has failed to provide in any manner the work or services agreed to herein, and if the County deems said breach to warrant corrective action, the following sequential procedure will apply: A, The County will notify the Agency in writing of the nature of the breach; The Agency shall respond in writing within three (3) working days of its receipt of such notification, which response shall indicate the steps being taken to correct the specified deficiencies. The corrective action plan shall specify the proposed completion date for bringing the Contract into compliance, which date shall not be more than ten (10) days from the date of the Agency's response, unless the County, at its sole discretion, specifies in writing an extension in the number of days to complete the corrective actions; ß, The County will notify the Agency in writing of the County's determination as to the sufficiency of the Agency's corrective action plan, The determination of sufficiency of the Agency's corrective action plan shall be at the sole discretion of the County; C, In the event that the Agency does not respond within the appropriate time with a corrective action plan, or the Agency's corrective action plan is determined by the County to be insufficient, the County may commence termination of this Contract in whole or in part pursuant to Section XI.B; D. In addition, the County may withhold any payment owed the Agency or prohibit the Agency from incurring additional obligations of funds until the County is satisfied that corrective action has been taken or completed; and E. Nothing herein shall be deemed to affect or waive any rights the parties may have pursuant to Section XI, Subsections A, B, C, D, and E. City of Federal Way Page 4 of! 8 X. ASSIGN M ENT ISU BCONTRACTING A, The Agency shall not assign or subcontract any portion of this Contract or transfer or assign any claim arising pursuant to this Contract without the written consent of the County. Said consent must be sought in writing by the Agency not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of any proposed assignment. B. "Subcontract" shall mean any agreement between the Agency and a subcontractor or between subcontractors that is based on this Contract, provided that the term "subcontract" does not include the purchase of (1) support services not related to the subject matter of this Contract, or (2) supplies. XI. TERMINATION A, This Contract may be terminated by the County without cause, in whole or in part, prior to the date specified in Section II. by providing the Agency thirty (30) days advance written notice of the termination. B. .The County may terminate this Contract, in whole or in part, upon seven (7) days advance written notice in the event: (1) the Agency materially breaches any duty, obligation, or service required pursuant to this Contract, or (2) the duties, obligations, or services required herein become impossible, illegal, or not feasible. If the Contract is terminated by the County pursuant to this Subsection XI. B. (1), the Agency shall be liable for damages. including any additional costs of procurement of similar services from another source. If the termination results from acts or omissions of the Agency, including but not limited to misappropriation, nonperformance of required services, or fiscal mismanagement, the Agency shall return to the County immediately any funds, misappropriated or unexpended, which have been paid to the Agency by the County. C. If County expected or actual funding is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way prior to the termination date set forth above in Section II, the County may, upon written notification to the Agency, terminate this Contract in whole or in part. If the Contract is terminated as provided in this Subsection: (1) the County will be liable only for payment in accordance with the terms of this Contract for services rendered prior to the effective date of termination; and (2) the Agency shall be released from any obligation to provide such further services pursuant to the Contract as are affected by the termination. Funding or obligation under this Contract beyond the current appropriation year is conditional upon appropriation by the County Council of sufficient funds to support the activities described in the Contract. Should such appropriation not be approved, this Contract will terminate at the close of the current appropriation year. 0, The Agency may terminate this Contract upon seven (7) days written notice, should the County commit any material breach of this Contract. City of Federal Way Page 5 of 18 E. Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or remedy provided by this Contract or law that either party may have in the event that the obligations, terms, and conditions set forth in this Contract are breached by the other party. XII. FUTURE SUPPORT The County makes no commitment to support the services contracted for herein and assumes no obligation for future support of the activity contracted herein except as expressly set forth in this Contract. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION XIII. A. In providing services under this Contract, the Agency is an independent Contractor, and neither it nor its officers, agents, or employees are employees of the County for any purpose. The Agency shall be responsible for all federal and/or state tax, industri.al insurance, and Social Security liability that may result from the performance of and compensation for these services and shall make no claim of career service or civil service rights which may accrue to a County employee under state or local law. The County assumes no responsibility for the payment of any compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes by, or on behalf of the Agency, its employees, and/or others by reason of this Contract. The Agency shall protect, indemnify, and save harmless the County and the State of Washington, their officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all claims, costs, and/or losses whatsoever occurring or resulting from (1) the Agency's failure to pay any such compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes, and/or (2) the supplying to the Agency of work, services, materials, or supplies by Agency employees or other suppliers in connection with or support of the performance of this Contract. B. The Agency further agrees that it is financially responsible for and will repay the County all indicated amounts following an audit exception which occurs due to the negligence, intentional act, and/or failure, for any reason, to comply with the terms of this Contract by the Agency, its officers, employees, agents, and/or representatives. This duty to repay the County shall not be diminished or extinguished by the prior termination of the Contract pursuant to the Duration of Contract or the Termination section. C. Each party to the Contract shall be responsible for the negligence of its officers, employees, and agents in the performance of the Contract. No party to the Contract shall be responsible for the acts and/or omissions of entities or individuals not a party to the Contract. D. Nothing contained within this provision shall affect or alter the application of any other provision contained within this Contract. XIV. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS A. By the date of execution of this Contract, the Agency shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Contract, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from, or in connection with, the performance of work hereunder by the Agency, its agents, representatives, employees, and/or subcontractors. The costs of such insurance shall be paid by the Agency or City of Federal Way Page 6 of18 subcontractor. The Agency may furnish separate certificates of insurance and policy endorsements for each subcontractor as evidence of compliance with the insurance requirements of this Contract. The Agency is responsible for ensuring compliance with all of the insurance requirements stated herein. Failure by the Agency, its agents, employees, officers, and or subcontractors, to comply with the insurance requirements stated herein shall constitute a material breach of this Contract. For All Coverages: Each insurance policy shall be written on an "occurrence" form; except that insurance on a "claims made" form may be acceptable with prior County approval. If coverage is approved and purchased on a "claims made" basis, the Agency warrants continuation of coverage, either through policy renewals or the purchase of an extended discovery period, if such extended coverage is available, for not less than three (3) years from the date of Contract termination, and/or conversion from a "claims made" form to an "occurrence" coverage form. By requiring such minimum insurance, the County shall not be deemed or construed to have assessed the risks that may be applicable to the Agency under this Contract. The Agency shall assess its own risks and, if it deems appropriate and/or prudent, maintain greater limits and/or broader coverage. Nothing contained within these insurance requirements shall be deemed to limit the scope, application and/or limits of the coverage afforded by said policies, which coverage will apply to each insured to the full extent provided by the terms and conditions of the policy(s). Nothing contained within this provision shall affect and/or alter the application of any other provision contained within this Contract. B. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. General Liability: Insurance Services Office form number (CG 00 01 Ed. 11-88) covering COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY). 2. Professional Liability: Professional Liability, Errors, and Omissions coverage. In the event that services delivered pursuant to this Contract either directly or indirectly involve or require professional services, Professional Liability, Errors, and Omissions coverage shall be provided. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this Contract section, shall mean any services provided by a licensed professional or those services that . require a professional standard of care. 3. Automobile Liability: In the event that services delivered pursuant to this Contract require the use of a vehicle or involve the transportation of clients by Agency personnel in Agency- owned vehicles or non-owned vehicles, the Agency shall provide evidence of the appropriate automobile coverage. City of Federal Way Page 7 of 18 Insurance Services Office form number (CA 00 01 Ed. 12-90) covering BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE, symbol 1 "any auto"; or the appropriate coverage provided by symbols 2, 7, 8, or 9. 4. Workers' Compensation Workers' Compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance Act of the State of Washington, as well as any similar coverage required for this work by applicable federal or "Other States" state law. 5. Stop Gap/Emplovers Liabilitv Coverage shall be at least as broad as the protection provided by the Workers' Compensation policy Part 2 (Employers Liability) or, in states with monopolistic state funds, the protection provided by the "Stop Gap" endorsement to the general liability policy. C. Minimum Limits of Insurance The Agency shall maintain limits no less than, for: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence by bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, and for those policies with aggregate limits, a $2,000,000 aggregate limit. 2. Professional Liability, Errors, and Omissions: $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. 3. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Except if the transport of clients by Agency personnel is involved, then Risk Management will review the appropriate amount of coverage. 4. Workers' Compensation: Statutory requirements of the state of residency. 5. Stop Gap/Employers Liability: $1,000,000 D. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the County. The deductible and/or self-insured retention of the policies shall not apply to the Agency's liability to the County and shall be the sole responsibility of the Agency. E. Other Insurance Provisions City of Federal Way The insurance policies required in this Contract are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. Liabilitv Policies Except Professional and Workers Compensation a, The County, its officers, officials, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Agency in connection wilh this Contract. Page 8 of 18 b. The Agency's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the County, its officers, officials, employees, and agents. Any insurance and/or self-insurance maintained by the County, its officers, officials, employees, or agents shall not contribute with the Agency's insurance or benefit the Agency in any way. c. The Agency's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made and/or lawsuit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 2. All Policies Coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits, except by the reduction of the applicable aggregate limit by claims paid, until after forty-five (45) days prior written notice has been given to the County. F, Acceptability of Insurers Unless otherwise approved by the County, insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A: VIII, or, if not rated with Bests, with minimum surpluses the equivalent of Bests' surplus size VIII. Professional Liability, Errors, and Omissions insurance may be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of B+VII. Any exception must be approved by King County. If, at any timè, the foregoing policies shall fail to meet the above minimum requirements the Agency shall, upon notice to that effect from the County, promptly obtain a new policy, and shall submit the same to the County, with appropriate certificates and endorsements, for approval. G, Verification of Coveraqe The Agency shall furnish the County certificates of insurance and endorsements required by this Contract. Such certificates and endorsements, and renewals thereof, shall be attached as exhibits to the contract. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be on forms approved by the County prior to the commencement of activities associated with the Contract. The County reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. H. Subcontractors The Agency shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates of insurance and policy endorsements from each subcontractor. Insurance coverages provided by subcontractors as evidence of compliance with the insurance requirements of this Contract shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. I. Municipal or State Aqency Provisions If the Agency is a Municipal Corporation or an Agency of the State of Washington and is self-insured for any of the above insurance requirements, a certification of self- City of Federal Way Page 9 of18 insurance shall be attached hereto and be incorporated by reference and shall constitute compliance with this Section. xv. NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY A, Nondiscrimination in Employment and Provision of Services During the performance of this Contract, neither the Agency nor any party subcontracting under the authority of this Contract shall discriminate or tolerate harassment on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, age, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability in the employment or ¡:¡pplication for employment or in the administration or delivery of services or any other benefits under this Contract. B. Nondiscrimination in Subcontractinq Practices During the solicitation, award and term of this Contract, the Agency shall not create barriers to open and fair opportunities to participate in County contracts or to obtain or compete for contracts and subcontracts as sources of supplies, equipment, construction and services. In considering offers from and doing business with subcontractors and suppliers, the Agency shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation or the presence of any mental or physical disability in an otherwise qualified disabled person. C. Compliance with Laws and ReQulations The Agency shall comply fully with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, executive orders and regulations that prohibit discrimination. These laws include, but are not limited to, RCW Chapter 49.60, Titles VI, VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Restoration Act of 1987. The Agency shall further comply fully with any affirmative action requirements set forth in any federal regulations, statutes or rules included or referenced in the contract documents. D. Small Business and Minoritv and Women Business Enterprise Opportunities King County encourages the Agency to utilize small businesses, including Minority- owned and Women-owned Business Enterprises ("MIWBEs") in County contracts. The County encourages the Agency to use the following voluntary practices to promote open competitive opportunities for small businesses, including M/WBEs: 1. Attending a pre-bid or pre-solicitation conference, if scheduled by the County, to provide project information and to inform small businesses and other firms of contracting and subcontracting opportunities. 2. Placing all qualified small businesses, attempting to do business in King County, including M/WBEs, on solicitation lists, and providing written notice of City of Federal Way Page 10 of18 subcontracting opportunities to these firms capable of performing the work, including without limitation all businesses on any list provided by the County, in sufficient time to allow such businesses to respond to the written solicitations. 3, Breaking down total requirements into smaller tasks or quantities, where economically feasible, in order to permit maximum participation by small businesses, including M/WBEs. 4. Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirements of this contract permit, that encourage participation by small businesses, including M/WBEs. 5. Providing small businesses, including M/WBEs that express interest with adequate and timely information about plans, specifications, and requirements of the Contract. 6. Using the services of available community organizations, contractor groups, local assistance offices, the County, and other organizations that provide assistance in the recruitment and placement of small businesses, including M/WBEs. 7. The Washington State Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises (OMWBE) can provide a list of certified M/WBEs. Contact OMWBE office on-line through their web site at www.wsdot.wa.qov/omwbe or at (360) 763-9693, E. Equal Emplovment Opportunitv. The Agency will implement and carry out the obligations in its Affidavit and Certificate of Compliance regarding equal employment opportunity, and all other requirements as set forth in the Affidavit and Certificate of Compliance. F. Fair Emplovment Practices. City of Federal Way King County Code Chapters 12.18 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein and such requirements apply to this Contract. During the performance of this Contract, neither the Agency nor any party subcontracting under the authority of this Contract shall engage in unfair employment practices. It is an unfair employment practice for any: 1. Employer or labor organization to discriminate against any person with respect to referral, hiring, tenure, promotion, terms, conditions, wages or other privileges of employment; 2. Employment agency or labor organization to discriminate against any person with respect to membership rights and privileges, admission to or participation in any guidance program, apprenticeship training program, or other occupational training program; Page 11 of18 3. Employer, employment agency, or labor organization to print, circulate, or cause to be printed, published or circulated, any statement, advertisement, or publication relating to employment or membership, or to use any form of application therefore, which indicates any discrimination unless based upon a bona fide occupation qualification; 4. Employment agency to discriminate against any person with respect to any reference for employment or assignment to a particular job classification; 5. Employer, employment agency or a labor organization to retaliate against any person because that person has opposed any practice forbidden by KCC Chapter 12.18 or because that person has made a charge, testified or assisted in any manner in any investigation, proceeding or hearing initiated under the provisions of KCC Chapter 12.18; 6. Publisher, firm, corporation, organization or association printing, publishing or circulating any newspaper, magazine or other written publication to print or cause to be printed or circulated any advertisement with knowledge that the same is in violation of KCC Chapter 12.18.030.C., or to segregate and separately designate advertisements as applying only to men or women unless such discrimination is reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business, enterprise or employment, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification; 7. Employer to prohibit any person from speaking in a language other than English in the workplace unless: a, The employer can show that requiring that employees speak English at certain times is justified by business necessity, and b. The employer informs employees of the requirement and the consequences of violating the rule. G. Record-Keepinq Requirements and Site Visits The Agency shall maintain, for at least six (6) years after completion of all work under this Contract, the following: 1. Records of employment, employment advertisements, application forms, and other pertinent data, records and information related to employment, applications for employment or the administration or delivery of services or any other benefits under this Contract; and 2. Records, including written quotes, bids, estimates or proposals submitted to the Agency by all businesses seeking to participate on this Contract, and any other information necessary to document the actual use of and payments to subcontractors and suppliers in this Contract, including employment records. City of Federal Way Page 12 of 18 The County may visit, at any time, the site of the work and the Agency's office to review the foregoing records. The Agency shall provide every assistance requested by the County during such visits. In all other respects, the Agency shall make the foregoing records available to the County for inspection and copying upon request. If this Contract involves federal funds, the Agency shall comply with all record keeping requirements set forth in any federal rules, regulations or statutes included or referenced in the contract documents, H. Sanctions for Violations Any violation of the mandatory requirements of the provisions of this Section shall be a material breach of contract, for which the Agency may be subject to damages, withholding payment and any other sanctions provided for by Contract and by applicable law. I. Reportinq 1. The Agency entering into a contract or agreement with King County valued at $25,000 or more shall submit with this contract a total Personnel Inventory Report providing employment data for minorities, females, and persons with disabilities, Subject to the provisions of KCC Chapter 12.16.060, the Agency's Personnel Inventory Report shall be effective for two years after the date on which the report was submitted. 2. The Agency entering into a contract with King County valued at more than $25,000, or contracts which in the aggregate have a value to the Agency of more than $25,000 should submit an affidavit of compliance in the form provided by the County, demonstrating commitment to comply with the provisions of KCC Chapter 12.16 in accordance with paragraph A of this Section XV. The Agency shall complete the affidavit of compliance provided by the County and attach the original, notarized, completed form to this Contract. Subject to the provisions of KCC Chapter 12.16.060, the Agency's affidavit of compliance shall be effective for two years after the date on which the report was submitted, If the Agency engages in unfair employment practices as defined above, remedies as set forth in KCC Chapter 12.18 shall be applied. The Agency will complete all reports and forms (including Department of Social and Health Services non-discrimination forms, where applicable) provided by the County and will otherwise cooperated fully with the County in monitoring and assisting the Agency in providing nondiscriminatory programs. XVI. SECTION 504 AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The Agency shall complete a 504/ADA Self-Evaluation Questionnaire for all programs and services offered by the Agency (including any services not subject to this Contract) and shall evaluate its services, programs and employment practices for compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended ("504") and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"). The Agency shall complete a 504/ADA Assurance of Compliance, and corrective action plan as needed for structural, programmatic, and/or City of Federal Way Page 13 of18 service changes necessary at each of its premises within the State of Washington to comply with 504 and the ADA, and it is attached as an exhibit to this Contract and is incorporated herein by reference. XVII. SUBCONTRACTS AND PURCHASES A. The Agency will include the above Sections IV, V, VI, VII, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, and XVI, in every subcontract or purchase agreement for services which relate to the subject matter of this Contract. 8, The Agency agrees to include the following language verbatim in every subcontract, provider agreement, or purchase agreement for services which relate to the subject matter of this contract: "Subcontractor shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless King County, its officers, employees and agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments, and/or awards of damages arising out of, or in any way resulting from the negligent act or omissions of subcontractor, its officers, employees, and/or agents in connection with or in support of this Contract. Subcontractor expressly agrees and understands that King County is a third party beneficiary to this contract and shall have the right to bring an action against subcontractor to enforce the provisions of this paragraph." XVIII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST KCC Chapter 3.04 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth hence, and the Agency agrees to abide by all conditions of said chapter. Failure by the Agency to comply with any requirement of said KCC Chapter shall be a material breach of contract. A. The Agency covenants that no officer, employee, or agent of the County who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and implementation of the program funded herein, or any other person who presently exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and implementation of the program funded herein shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Contract. The Agency shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance with this provision. B. If the Agency violates the provisions of Subsection XVII. or does not disclose other interest required to be disclosed pursuant to KCC Chapter 3.04, the County will not be liable for payment of services rendered pursuant to this Contract. Violation of this Section shall constitute a material breach of this Contract and grounds for termination pursuant to Section XI. above, as well as any other right or remedy provided in this Contract or law. XIX. POLITICAL ACTIVITY PROHIBITED None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this Contract shall be used for any partisan political activity or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office. xx. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE, MAINTENANCE. AND OWNERSHIP City of Federal Way Page 14 of18 A. The Agency agrees that any equipment purchased, in whole or in part, with Contract funds at a cost of $1,000 per item or more, when the purchase of such equipment is reimbursable as a Contract budget item, is upon its purchase or receipt the property of the County and/or federal/state government. B. The Agency shall be responsible for all such property, including the proper care and maintenance of the equipment. C. The Agency will ensure that all such equipment will be returned to the County or federal/state government upon termination of this Contract unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. D. The Agency will admit County staff to the Agency's premises for the purpose of marking such property with County property tags, E. The Agency shall establish and maintain inventory records and transaction documents (purchase requisitions, packing slips, invoices, receipts) of equipment purchased with Contract funds. XXI. NOTICES Whenever this Contract provides for notice to be provided by one (1) party to another, such notice shall be: A. In writing; and B. Directed to the chief executive officer of the Agency and the director of the County department specified on page one (1) of this Contract. Any time within which a party must take some action shall be computed from the date that the notice is received by said party. XXII. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS The parties to this Contract hereby mutually agree that if any patentable or copyrightable material or article should result from the work described herein, all rights accruing from such material or article shall be the sole property of the County. The County agrees to and does hereby grant to the Agency, irrevocable, nonexclusive, and royalty-free license to use, according to law, any material or article and use any method that may be developed as part of the work under this Contract. The foregoing license shall not apply to existing training materials, consulting aids, checklists, and other materials and documents of the Agency which are modified for use in the performance of this Contract. The foregoing provisions of this section shall not apply to existing training materials, consulting aids, checklists, and other materials and documents of the Agency that are not modified for use in the performance of this Contract. XXIII. CONTRACT AMENDMENTS Either party may request changes to this Contract. Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated by written amendments to this Contract. City of Federal Way Page 15 ofl8 XXIV KING COUNTY RECYCLED PRODUCT PROCUREMENT POLICY The Agency shall use recycled paper for the production of all printed and photocopied documents related to the fulfillment of this Contract and shall ensure that, whenever possible, the cover page of each document printed on recycled paper bears an imprint identifying it as recycled paper. If the cost of recycled paper is more than 15% higher than the cost of non-recycled paper, the Agency may notify the Contract Administrator, who may waive the recycled paper requirement. The Agency shall use both sides of paper sheets for copying and printing and shall use recycled/recyclable products wherever practical in the fulfillment of this Contract. XXV. ENTIRE CONTRACTIWAIVER OF DEFAULT The parties agree that this Contract is the complete expression of the terms hereto and any oral or written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. Both parties recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Contract. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of the Contract shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Contract unless stated to be such through written approval by the County, which shall be attached to the original Contract. XXVI. SERVICES PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND RULE AND REGULATION The Agency and any subcontractor agree, when applicable, to abide by the terms of Chapters 26.44, 69,54, 70.02, 70.96A, 71.05, 71A,10, 71A.14, 71A.18, 71.20, 71.24, and 71,34 of the Revised Code of Washington, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; the Basic Interagency Contract between the Department of Social and Health Services and King County, as amended, and regulations of the state and federal governments, as applicable, which control disposition of funds granted under this Contract, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. In the event that there is a conflict between any of the language contained in any exhibit or attachment to this Contract, the language in the Contract shall have control over the language contained in the exhibit or the attachment, unless the parties affirmatively agree in writing to the contrary. XXVII. CONFIDENTIALITY The agency agrees that all information, records, and data collected in connection with this contract shall be protected from unauthorized disclosure in accordance with applicable state and federal law. XXVIII. COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 Terms used in this section shall have the same meaning as those terms in the Privacy Rule, 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164. A. Obliqations and Activities of the Aqency City of Federal Way Page 16 of 18 B. C. City of Federal Way 1. The Agency agrees not to use or disclose protected health information other than as permitted or required by law. 2. The Agency agrees to use appropriate safeguards to prevent use or disclosure of protected health information other than as provided for in this Contract. 3. The Agency agrees to mitigate, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect that is known to the Agency of a use or disclosure of protect health information by the Agency in violation of the requirements of this Contract. 4. The Agency agrees to report to King County any use or disclosure of protected health information not provided for by this Contract of which it becomes aware, 5. The Agency agrees to ensure that any agent, including a subcontractor, to whom it provides protected health information received from, or created or received by the Agency on behalf of King County, agrees to the same restrictions and conditions that apply through this Contract to the Agency with respect to such information. 6. The Agency agrees to make available protected health information in accordance with 45 CFR § 164.524. 7. The Agency agrees to make available protected health information for amendment and incorporate any amendments to protected health information in accordance with 45 CFR § 164-526. 8. The Agency agrees to make internal practices, books, and records, including policies and procedures and protected health information, relating to the use and disclosure of protected health information received from, or created or received by the Agency on behalf of King County, available to the Secretary, in a reasonable time and manner for purposes of the Secretary determining King County" compliance with the privacy rule. 9, The Agency agrees to make available the information required to provide an accounting of disclosures in accordance with 45 CFR § 528. Permitted Uses and Disclosures by Business Associate The Agency may use or disclose protected health information to perform functions, activities, or services for, or on behalf of, King County as specified in this Contract, provided that such use or disclosure would not violate the Privacy Rule if done by King County or the minimum necessary policies and procedures of King County. Effect of Termination 1. Except as provided in paragraph C.2. of this section, upon termination of this Contract, for any reason, the Agency shall return or destroy all protected health information received from King County, or created or received by the Agency on behalf of King County, This provision shall apply to protected health information that is in the possession of subcontractors or agents of the Agency. The Agency shall retain no copies of the protected health information. Page 17 of 18 2. In the event the Agency determines that returning or destroying the protected health information is infeasible, the Agency shall provide to King County notification of the conditions that make return or destruction infeasible. Upon notification that return or destruction of protected health information is infeasible, the Agency shall extend the protections of Contract to such protected health information and limit further uses and disclosure of such protected health information to those purposes that make the return or destruction infeasible, for so long as the Agency maintains such protected health information. KING COUNTY: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY .FOR Signature King County Executive Date Name (Please type or print) Date Approved as to Form: OFFICE OF THE KING COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY November _,2002 City of Federal Way Page 18of18 From: StevIe Roberton At B.-own & B.-own of Washington FaxID: Fax 253-396-4500 To: Cliff Floberg UatE Exhibit I ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCI;EDi~~OSR I OA TE IMMIDONY¡ 01/02/03 PROOUœR THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Brown & Brown of Washington HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P. O. Box 1718 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Tacoma WA 98401 Phone: 253-396-5500 Fax: 253-396-4500 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSl-"ED INSœER A: st Pau1 Fire & Marine ~H!J,°iJ;~iÍ~~s~~~ein INSU<ER B INS\.ÆRC POBox 9718 tt<SURERD. ~ederalway WA 98063-9718 INSU<ER E COVERAGES 1>£ POliCIES Œ ...........,. LISTED BELOW I¥.VE BEEN """'" TO 1>£ "'"'-"ED """"0 /'BOVE FOR 1>£ POliCY PERIOD """CATED. NOTWITHSTANDING .ANY REQU1RfMENT, TERM OR cowmaN Œ - COI<TRACT OR OT>£R oocu.EHT WT1H RESPECT TO WHIOi lHS CERnFlCA TE MAY EIE ISSŒO OR MAY PERTAIN, 1>£ 1NSlR'NŒ AFFOROED BY 1>£ POlICIES DESCRIBED >£REIN IS 5œ.Æ'CT TO ALL 1>£ TERMS exQUSIONS AND C"""'TIONS Œ SUCH POliCIES. AGGREGATELIMfTS SHO'M< MAY I¥.VE BEEN REDUCED BY PAlDa.AJMS. . LTR TYPE OF INStRWIœ DATE \MM/DDIYY} POlICY """""" OATE (MMIOOI'IY ~ UASI.ITY A ~~IÞJ.GElERAL.L"""lITY GP09306934 I- U ClAIMS....". ŒJ oca.o¡ 01/31/02 EACH OCcæ!<ENŒ 01/31/03 FlREDAMAGE!"""""""J '-EDEXP IAny"""""",,) PERSDNAL & I'DV IN..U<Y FiGE"'- AGGRE~ L,::, ~~ PER PQUCY I I .>'CT I I LOC ~BILE LIABIUTY A~-ALJfO I- "'-LO'MoEDALJfOS I- SQ£IJLŒ) ALJfOS I- HlREDALJfOS I-- NON-DWIoED ALJfOS I- GEr-ERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - C""'IOP """ GP09306934 01/31/02 C"""'IoED SINGLE LIMIT 01/31/03 IE..oo_) BOOIL Y INJæY IP""""",J BOOIL Y INJæY IP.'ocd"""J PROPERTY DAMAGE IP" ocd_J hGELlABR.ITY H.ANYALJfD ALJfO ""'- Y - EAACC()ENr DT>£R THAN ALJfD,,",-Y A t~r:c=LITY 0 a.AJMS....". h DEDUCTIBLE Ix1RETENT1aN $10,000 WORIŒRS COMPENSA11ON AND EMPLOYERS'LIASLITY A GP09306934 01/31/02 EACH OCCU<RENCE 01/31/03 AGGREGATE UMITS $ $1,000,000 $ $ 100,000 $$ 0 $$1,000,000 $$2,000,000 1$2,000,000 11,000,000 1 $ 1 EAACC $ """ $ $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $ 1 1 .........., """ OM - 01/31/02 Imk~l';'~1 X¡o~:¡- 01/31/03 EL EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 ELOISEASE-EAEM'lOYEE $1,000,000 ELDISEASE-POlICYLIMIT $1,000,000 EMl'LOYERS L:IAIIXL:ITY D1HER DESCRIPTlON OF OPeRAT1ONS4.OCATlONSIVEHCLESÆXCLUSIONS ADOED BY ENDORSEMEHTISÆCIAl PROVISIONS :It is agreed that the certificate Ho1der is inc1uded as Additional :Insured but on1y as respects the contract #D32540D inc1uding the Fami1y support Extension Srant CERTIFICATE HOLDER Iy] AOOfT1ONAI.""""",,,;""'-""RLETTE'" A KJ:NG-09 CANCELLATION King county - Deve1opmenta1 Disabilities Division Attn; C1iff F1oberg 821 Second Avenue, #400 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SHOU.O "" OF '!HE ABOVE [lESCRlBED POUCIES Be CANCELLED BEFORE THE eXPIRATION DATE '!HEREOF, '!HE ISSlm'IG INSURER WIlL ENDEAVOR TO MAL ~ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICe TO '!HE CERTlfICA TE HOLDER NAMED TO '!HE LEFT, BUT FAA.""" TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF "" KINO """" '!HE ""S'-"ER, ITS AGENTS OR RePRESENTATIVES. 11WJ"1~ ~SENTATIVE I L/A7JI '"I - ACORD 25-5 (1/97) @ACORDCORPORATIONI988 From: Ste\;e Roberton At Brown & Brown of Washòngton FaxIO: Fax 253-396-4500 To: em Floberg ADDmONAl PROTECTED PERSONS ENDORSEMENT - DESCRIBED PERSONS OR ORGANIZATIONS This endorsement changes your Commercial General Liability Protection. Date: lmu~ UL:~L ~M ~age: 1 of 3 w..stIIU How Coverage Is Changed There are two chenges explained below. 1. The following is added to the Who Is Protected Under This Agreement section. This change edds certain protected persons and limits their protection. Described addiUonal protected persons. The person or organization shown in the Coverage Summary as an additional protected person for this endorsement is a protected person. But only for covered bodily injury and property damage that results from your work for that person or organization. If you agree In a written contract for insurance to add that person or organization as an additional protected person under this agreement and if that written contract for Insurance specifically requires such coverage for them, that person or organization Is also a protected person for the following: . covered bodily Injury or property damage that results from your completed work for that person or organization; or . covered personal in1ury that results from your business activities for that person or organization. Howevar, any person or organization shown in the Coverage Summary as an additional protected person for this endorsement is a protected person only for the lesser of: . the limits of coverage required by the written contract for insurance; or . the limits of coverage for this agreement, But a person or organization who's an architect, engineer. or surveyor and Is shown In the Coverage Summary as an additional protected person for this endorsement is not a protected person for bodily injury. property damage. or personal Injury resulting from the performance of or failure to perform architect, engineer. or surveyor professional services. Written contract for insurance means that part of any written contract or agreement In which you agree to add a person or organization as an additional protected person under this agreement that: . was made before; and . is in effect when; the bodily Injury or property damage happens. or the personal injury offense is committed. Additional protected person may elso be called an additional insured in a written contract for insurance. We explain what we: . mean by your work and your completed wort( in the Products and completed work total limit section; and . consider architect. engineer, or surveyor professional s8l"vlces to include in the Contract liability exclusion. 2. The following Is added to the Other primary' or excess Insurance part of the Other Insurance section. This change limits coverage. We'll also apply thIs agreement as excess Insurance over the part or parts of any primary or excess other insurance which provides protection for any person or organization shown In the Coverage Summary as an additional protected person for this endorsement. However. If you specifically agree In a written contract for insurance that this Insurance must be primary to and non-contributory VOO55 Ed. 8-00 PrInted in U.S.A. Endorsement oSt.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 2000 All Rights Reserved Page 1 of 2 From: Stevie Roberton At Brown & Brown of Waslllngton FaxlU:..ax 2S3-3~"'4~UU 10: um rlODerg ~d'e. ,,=~ U£.~£ eM rage: ¿ m ~ 1MSt1W with other Insurance Issued directly to that person or organization, we'll apply this agreement as primary Insurance for damages covered by. this endorsement that are Incurred by that person or organization. and we won't share those damages with such other Insurance. Other Terms All other terms of your policy remain the same. VOO55 Ed. 8-00 Printed in U.S.A. Page 2 of 2 cSt.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. 2000 All Rights Reserved " ~EB. 4.2003 2: WPM SUPPORT SVCS Exhibit II 504fADA DISABILITY ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE! Complying with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the A~ericans With Disa bilities Act of 1990, two federal laws which prohibit discrimination ~gainst qualifie<! people with disabilities. I understand that federal and state laws prohibit discrimination ¡npublic accommodatiQns and employment based solely on disability, In addition, I recognize that Section 604 requi~s recipients of federal funds (either directly or through contracting with a governmental entity receiving federal funds) to make their programs, services, alid activities, when viewed in their entirety, ~ccessible to qualified and/or eligible people with disabilities. I agree to comply with, and to require ~hat aU subcontractors comply with, the Section 5O4/ADA requirements. I understand that re~onable accommodation is requireQ in both program services and employment, except where tþ do so would cause an undue hardship or burden. . I agree to cooperate in any compliance review and to proVide reasonable access to th~ premises of all places of business and employment and to records, files. information, and employees therein to King County for reviewing compliance with Section 504 and ADA requirements. I agree that any violatíQtl of the specific provisions and terms of the 504/ADA Disabilit)\ Assurance of Compliance and/or Corrective Action Plan require<! herein or Section 504 or the ADA, J:¡hall be deemed a breach of a material provision of the Contract between the County and the (¡X)ntractor. Such a breach shall be grounds for cancellation, termination, or suspension. in whole ~r in part, of this Contract by the County. According to the responses to the questions in the 504/ADA Self-Evaluation Questionnaire, (company name) 1\u. ~ of ~ÁUILi W'^'1 . is in compliance wIth 504/ADA. If the above response is NO, the following corrective actions will be taken: (ý§) NO Corrective Action Plan The following Corrective Action Plan is submitted to comply with Section 504 and ADA requirements. General Requirements Actions To Be Taken Cbmpletlon Date Program Access Cpmp(lItion Dale ActIons To Be Taken , 504fADA DISABILITY ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE (contln~ed) 5041ÆDA Cootn¡ct Forms, 8-21-01 FEB. 4.2003 " " ,'- 2: llPM SUPPORT SVCS NO. 955 P.3/3 Actions To l3e Taken " . Employment and Reasonable Accommodation (fompleUon Date Actions To Be Taken Physical Accessibility Oompleton Pate I Declare Under Penalty of Perjury under the Laws of the State of Washington th~t the Foregoing Is True and Correct. Contractor: (\.I\~' I'JfWu~\ ~~ Company'Name " ~?m ~~s ) ~ \~\ ~'\\.- ~\ ~\ Authorized Signer. ~,..{\~ s¿,\--"foJ.e..r '\::::.::n-u.!-\Y' NaZ? J:rç T~e 7e ~ For NoblY: , State of Washington, County of ~ Signed and attested before me on (date) ~ '/1 )óV signer name) &." '(í Ø( Wk 4- t'bb3 Slate: Zip 2b3~&I+-4°tfD Phone by (print allthorized >0..,. ,~ ";:"o¡" , N C '" "- ...,.... ( ". '\ . "'~~'IUt". 1...\"", , .~'" . "," '. ~ ~, f !!;f{:~OTMf' ~ ?'- ~ >1>, ,¡'°Þ-".- M , , . ~p \c, OJ , , ',"¡"; U Ð \. <.0 .. ":'.:1'~~(}~" ~'")' ,<' '.. ",~,"', '+ ...- " ". w"""',,,..,. ..", My appointment expires: 5D4IADA Contract Form9, 8-21-01 2 I. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GR-III-1 EXHIBIT III GENERAL REQUIREMENTS WORK STATEMENT A. Board of Directors 1. If the Agency is incorporated, it must have an active, legally constituted board of directors in accordance with RCW Chapters 23B or 24, as applicable, If the Agency is non-profit, the board cannot include staff members or consultants who are directly involved in the Agency's operation 2. 3. The board's membership roster, copies of the bylaws and minutes of meetings of the past year must be available for review. 4. The board must approve the Agency's annual budget, and there must be board oversight of fiscal operations. B. Agency Administration 1. The Agency shall have current organizational charts describing administrative lines of authority and containing the position titles of program staff. 2. The Agency shall maintain a job description for each position within the organization, detailing duties and responsibilities. 3. The agency shall have a written statement describing the mission of the organization. 4. The Agency will have on file all appropriate certificates and licenses in order for the Agency to operate as required by Federal, State or local law, rule or regulation. II. INDIVIDUAL HUMAN AND CIVil RIGHTS PROTECTION A. The Agency will protect individual human and civil rights by its actions and by having written policies which address, at a minimum, the following: 1. Prohibiting discrimination in accordance with Section XV. Nondiscrimination and Equal Emplovment Opportunitv of this Contract. 2. If providing a direct service, an appeal/grievance process when a participant or his/her guardian disagrees with an Agency decision. This appeal/grievance process must ensure that CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GR-III-2 a. All conflicts are negotiated, b. That a mediation process is available upon request using someone unaffected by the outcome That the individual may be represented by an advocate. c. 3. Protecting participants from exploitation, neglect, and abuse while receiving services. 4. Complying with Washington State law requiring background checks as required by RCW 43.43.830 - RCW 43.43.845 on all employees providing direct service to persons with developmental disabilities. This shall be completed prior to working with participants and their families. c. A copy of the completed and current background inquiries shall be maintained in the Agency's records. Criminal history background checks performed by DSHS DDD expire in 3 years and Washington State Patrol checks expire in 2 years from the date the check was made and either background check is acceptable. Policy and procedures for Mandated Reporters, which includes all staff and volunteers, in accordance RCW 74.34, RCW 26.44 and DSHS DDD Policy 5.13 Protection from Abuse. a. b. a. Report any suspected instance of abuse, neglect or exploitation to local law enforcement and either Children's Protective Services or Adult Protective Services as appropriate. b. For any suspected physical or sexual abuse, or a potential life threatening situation, immediately call 911. c. Ensure that all staff and volunteers are aware of the special statewide phone number 1 (800) 562-5624 for mandated reporters. 5. Providing for staff intervention in the most dignified, age-appropriate manner necessary in all situations, including instances when a participant's behavior jeopardizes the safety of him/herself or others or the behavior significantly disrupts program operations. All interventions must meet the requirements of DSHS/DDD policies 5.14, Positive Behavioral Supports, 5.15 Use of Restrictive Procedures, and 5.17 Physical/Manual Intervention Techniques issued under authority of RCW 71.A. Personnel policies must include disciplinary consequences for staff members for violation of client rights. 6. III. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GR-III-3 B. 7. Ensuring client confidentiality of records, including the provision of release of information and/or an oath of confidentiality. 8. The Agency shall also provide each client and/or family or advocate, as appropriate, who is receiving the service, an orientation or other informational meeting in which the following are explained a. Participant Rights b. Grievance/complaint procedures c. A description of what the recipient may expect through participation in the Agency's services. The Agency shall provide this information in a written document 9. The Agency shall maintain documentation to demonstrate that all staff is knowledgeable of and trained in the implementation of items above. The agency retains the right to turn down new referrals. The Agency also retains the right to terminate services to individuals for cause. 1. The Agency must have written policies which reflect their referral acceptance policies and termination policies. 2. The policies must describe reasons which may lead to rejection of a referral or termination of current service to an individual. 3. The policy must contain procedures for appeal on behalf of existing or potential clients. SERVICE DELIVERY A. Services to be purchased by the County with State funds are restricted to King County residents who have been declared eligible by the State Division of Development Disabilities (ODD) Field Services Region IV. However, with pre-authorization from the County of residence, an Agency may bill for services provided to a resident of another county provided that King County has negotiated with the county of residence for funding to cover the costs of the services provided. B. Services for eligible children and adults and their family are available in accordance with WAC 388. C. Services should have clear outcomes for individuals consistent with the values and principles of integration and increased independence, The County Guidelines, and the authorized service being purchased by the County. The Agency shall cooperate with Region 4 Field Services and the County in any efforts to increase access to services for communities of color and to deliver services in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner. D. IV. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GR-III-4 E. The Agency shall coordinate services and resources, as appropriate, to meet the needs of individuals served by the Agency in order to complement and maximize available community resources REPORTING AND EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS A. Reporting Requirements 1. Monthly DDD Service Report The Monthly DDD Service Reports are due on or before the 101h working day after the close of the calendar month in which the services were delivered. However, the reports for the months of the June and December are due on or before the 411\ working day of the following month. The reports must be submitted according to the process and format specified by the County. The Agency shall review the documents for accuracy and completeness prior to submitting them to the County. 2. B. The Agency shall report any injury accident, which requires more than simple first aid, and any extraordinary incident which requires intervention by the Agency, to the case manager for the individual involved and to the County. 1. The initial report may be done through documented telephone calls to the County Social Service Coordinator and the DSHS DDD Case Manager. 2. The Agency shall submit a written follow-up report within 10 days to the County 3. Serious and emergent incidents shall be handled in accordance with DSHS/DDD Policy 12.01 Incident Management. C. The file for each client receiving services billed to King County must contain medical information (medications, diet, allergies, etc.) needed during the hours of service shall be available for each individual. D. The Agency's attendance records and/or service delivery records shall document all services billed to King County. The Agency shall submit, when required by the County, Corrective Action Plans and Corrective Action Reports in accordance with time frames established by the County. E. F. Revenue, Expenditure, and Accounting Reports 1. The Agency agrees to cooperate with the County should revenue and expenditure information be required by the County in the future, and/or if the County seeks financial data related to specific service delivery costs. V. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GR-III-5 2. The agency shall include by insertion or attachment the following certification in its monthly invoice, with signature and date signed by Agency Director or designee: Vendor's Cerlificate. I hereby cerlify under penalty of perjury that the items and total listed herein are proper charges for materials, merchandise or selVices furnished to King County, and that all goods furnished and/or selVices rendered have been provided without discrimination because of age, sex, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, handicap, religion, sexual orientation, or Vietnam era or disabled veterans status. By: Date: 3. Final Billing The Agency shall submit final billings for services provided during the period January 1, through June 30, 2003 including retroactive adjustments by July 8, 2003, to meet the State of Washington fiscal year-end close-out. The Agency shall submit final billings for services provided during the period July 1, through December 31, 2003 including retroactive adjustments by January 6, 2003 to meet the King County fiscal year-end close-out, 2003. Should the Agency not provide the invoices by these deadline dates, the County will be relieved of all liability for payment of amounts billed in said or in any subsequent invoice monthly reimbursement. SPECIAL PAYMENT PROVISIONS -TEMPORARY CLOSURES OF PROGRAMS A. Programs receiving reimbursement on a fee for service basis or on the basis of meeting a minimum monthly service level may qualify for reimbursement for any closure or substantial non-attendance necessitated by natural causes, disasters, state offered training such as the Ellensburg Conference, or mechanical failures above and beyond the control of the service provider. In order to qualify for reimbursement, the Agency must demonstrate that the closure meets one of the following conditions: B. 1. Weather conditions or other natural causes necessitating the closure of the public schools in the Agency's catchment area. 2. Other conditions, including training events, for which the County has obtained concurrence from ODD Regional Manager/Administrator that the closure is necessary. Fee-for-service reimbursement shall be based on the average units of service provided per client per day during the service month immediately preceding the month in which the closure occurred. Likewise, the adjusted reimbursement for a minimum service level contract will be calculated using the service month immediately preceding the month in which the closure occurred. The Agency shall CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GR-III-6 report, on the invoice attached to the Monthly DDD Service Report ("CHRIS") form, the units of service (and clients) thus claimed separate from the clients and units of service claimed for "open" days. C. No Federal Title XIX funds may be used for this purpose. I. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FSCSG -IV- I EXHIBIT IV FAMILY SUPPORT COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT WORK STATEMENT The Agency shall provide services to enrolled participants in accordance with the terms and conditions described hereinafter and in accordance with Exhibit III. General Requirements. The total amount of reimbursement for this Exhibit shall not exceed $2.100 from State and/ or County Funds for the contract period January 1 through June 30, 2003. II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION A. B. C. 4. 5. D. Goal To promote and support community opportunities for individuals (children and adults) with developmental disabilities who reside with their families. Objectives 1. 2. 3. 4. To be family focused Increase inclusion of persons with developmental disabilities Promote community collaboration Expand horticultural skills, increase health and fitness opportunities for 20 to 30 individuals with developmental disabilities. Eligible Population Activities funded by this contract can be provided to assist only individuals (children and adults) whose label of developmental disabilities means a condition, which meets the following: 1. A condition defined as mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, or another neurological or other condition as defined in revised WAC 388; 2. Originates before the individual reaches eighteen (18) years of age; 3. Continues indefinitely; Results in a substantial handicap. ODD eligible children and their families as defined in WAC 388-825. Such eligibility shall be approved by Region 4 ODD. Program Requirements III. IV. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FSCSG -IV. 2 1. To develop and implement community based service projects that benefit individuals (children and adults) with developmental disabilities and their families as stated in the 2003 Contract Project Data Sheet. Reference Attachments A. 2. Eligible participants are individuals (children and adults) who live with their families or independently. 3. The Agency shall facilitate the use of generic community resources. 4. The Agency shall build community partnerships within and outside of the developmental disabilities system. 5. The Agency shall address the diverse needs of communities of color and limited or non-English speaking groups. 6. The Agency shall administer a survey to evaluate whether the activities are meeting the needs of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT A. The Agency shall complete the Billing Invoice Attachment B when billing for reimbursement of actual allowable expenditures under this contract. B. The total reimbursement for the contract period shall not exceed the amount in I. Work Statement of this Exhibit. C. The billing invoice and other required reporting documents serve as the Agency's invoice to the County for services rendered. The County may, at its option, withhold reimbursement for any months for which the required reports have not been received or are not accurate and/or complete. REPORTING AND EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS A. Submit with each billing a brief progress report, on the activities identified in the project and complete the Project Participant Sheet Attachment C, B. For the purposes of this contract administer a survey to evaluate whether the activities are meeting the needs of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. A report of the results shall be submitted no later than with the June 30, 2003 billing. ATIACHMENT A 2003 Contract Project Data Sheet 1, Project Name: Discovery Trust. Swimmino/Fitness & Horticulture. 2. Name of Agency/Organization: City of Federal Way & Highline CC. 3. Date project (services) will begin Jan 2, 2003. (Cannot be earlier than January 1, 2003) 4. Date project (services) will end June 30, 2003. (Cannot be later than June 30, 2003 5. Project goal or goals. What results are expected from project? (Limit your response to 50 words or less,) We desire to increase community involvement and awareness of and for people with developmental disabilities through' inclusive programming of our two funded areas. We wish to help remove barriers for those with disabilities (physical, financial, mental), increase health and fitness levels, and increase horticultural skills and horticultural benefit recognition (mental, physical and environmental) for all involved. 6. Check the theme(s) that best describes your project: 2S; Community Resource Development Parents Helping Parents - (Respite) Provider Development 7. How many eligible (ODD enrolled individuals living with their families) participants will the project serve? 20 - 30 8. Identify service population: 2S; Adults Only Children Only Both Adults and Children 9. What area( s) of the County will the project serve? South King County - mostly Federal Way 10. What are these funds being used for? (Limit your response to 50 words or less.) The funds will be used to either offset program fees, or enable people to participate completely free. They will also be used to pay necessary staff G:lAgencieslAgencies 2003\C~y of Federal Way 2003\FSCSG Data Sheet 2003.doc ATTACHMENT A 2003 Contract Project Data Sheet or one to one assistants, pay facility fees (for example, pool fees) and some program supplies, 11. Briefly describe the project. (Limit your response to one page or less.) HORTICULTURE PROGRAM. An on-going community horticulture project held at Dumas Bay Centre, a City of Federal Way facility located in Federal Way, Washington. People with developmental disabilities can work with their families and other members of the community to create a beautiful park that can be enjoyed by the entire community. By participating in this program, all people involved will realize the mental, physical and environmental benefits that stem from gardening, landscaping and caring for an outdoor facility. All involved will also be educated on different aspects of horticulture, which could possibly lead to a career in the field. SWIMMING & FITNESS PROGRAM. The purpose of this program is to help people with developmental disabilities access existing swimming lessons, water aerobics classes for health and fitness, therapy, social skills, enrichment and education. In most cases, the individual will attend class with a person who does not have a disability, therefore promoting inclusion. This program has expanded beyond water activities for fitness to include walking, Yoga, Tai Chi, aerobics and more. An individual plan is made for each person wishing to participate to facilitate individual needs to the highest degree. 2 G:lAgencieslAgencies 2003\City of Federal Way 2003\FSCSG Data Sheet 2003.doc KCDDD FAMILY SUPPORT COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Manual legend: I Black 1- For description and formulas. Don't change any black cells. Blue - For mònthly update areas. Red - For linking data from other sheet. Don't change any red cells. Submitted by: E-mail P-mail - "kc.chris@metrokc.gov"; send invoice with original signature by P-mail. - Attn: EstherWu, KCDDD Address For questions about service programs, please contact Irma Hill @ (206) 296-2913. For questions about fiscal issues, please contact Esther Wu @ (206) 205-0681. Instruction 03_FSCSG_lnvoice 12/4/02 12:13 PM ATTACHMENT B KCDDD FAMILY SUPPORT COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT BILLING INVOICE Agency Name: Address: Month: Program Name: Telephone: Describe Unit Total # EXDenditures Price Quantity Amount Note 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total 2003 Budget Balance Available .King County Vendor's Certificate I hereby certify under penalty of perjury thaf fhe ~ems and total listed herein are proper charges for materials, merchandise or services furnished to King County, and that all goods furnished and/or services rendered have been provided without discrimination because of age, sex. marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, handicap, religion, sexual orientation, or Vietnam era or disabled veterans status. Prepared by: Date: PRINT NAME & TITLE SIGNATURE 03 JSCSG _Invoice Invoice 12/8/02 4:17 PM * Project Participant Definition: 1) List only participants with a developmental disability who live at home or on their own and who are enrolled in the developmental disabilities system. 2) You may no longer list participants who are not enrolled in the DD system. ATTACHMENT C KCDDD FAMILY SUPPORT COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT PROJECT PARTICIPANT SHEET Agency Name: Address: Month Program Name: T I h e ~ one: # Last First Middle Case Date of Participation Describe Name Name Initial Number" BIrth Days Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 . The Case Numbers should be the same as the State DD Case Numbers. Prepared by: Date: PRINT NAME & TITLE Activity 03 _FSCSG Jnvoice 12/8/02 4:17 PM MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Amendment to extend Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) contract. CATEGORY: UUDGET IMPACT: [8J CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUULIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Uudgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated March 20, 2003; Amendment to extend Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) contract. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) has been providing landscape maintenance services to Adelaide, Alderdale, AIderbrook and English Garden Parks since May 2001, for an annual cost of $20,221 .32, with a total for the 2 year contract of $40,442,64 including tax, Staff recommends extending their contract for an additional year. The legal department has reviewed this contract amendment. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Move to recommend a "do pass" to fuB Council and authorize the City Manager to accept this amendment to extend the Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) contract for an additional one year for an annual cost of $20,258,56 and a grand total of $60,70 l.20 and place this item before Council on May 6, 2003, PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of the Amendment to extend Facility Maintenance Contractors contract as presented, " ~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 API'ROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 181" reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.1 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: March 20, 2003 PRHSPS Council Committee Steve Ikerd, Property Service!'JVlanager SJ:.. David Moseley, City Manage~~ Amendment to extend Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) contract Backe:round: Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) has been providing landscape maintenance services to Adelaide, Alderdale, A]derbrook and English Gardens Parks since May 2001, for an annua] cost of $20,221.32, with a total for the 2 yr contract of $40,442,64 including tax, Recommendation: Staff recommends extending their contract for an additional one year for an annual cost of $20,258,56, which reflects a tax rate increase since the last contract. The total for the three-year contract is $60,701.20. The legal department has reviewed this contract amendment. Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommcnd a "do pass" to full Council and to authorize the City Manager to accept this amendment to extend the Facility Maintenance Contractors (FMC) contract for an additional one year for an annual cost of $20,258.56 and a grand tota] of $60,701.20 and place this itcm before Council on May 6, 2003. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: 1:.-1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE/LABOR AGREEMENT FOR FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRAcToRS ~4Fr ~é1J This First Amendment ("Amendment") is dated effective this 1" day of May, 2003, and is entered into by and between the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City"), and Facility Maintenance Contractors, a Washington Corporation ("Contractor"), A. The City and Contractor entered into a Maintenance!Labor Agreement dated effective May 1,2001, whereby Contractor agreed to provide park landscape maintenance at Adelaide Park, Alderdale Park, Alderbrook Park and English Gardens, located in Federal Way, Washington ("Agreement"). B. Section 18.2 ofthe Agreement provided that the Agreement may only be amended by written agreement signed by the parties. C. The City and the Contractor desire to amend the Agreement to continue the Services described in Section 1 ofthe Agreement by extending the term of the Agreement and increasing the compensation paid to the Contractor. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions: I. Term. Section 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term of the Agreement until April 30, 2004. 2. Compensation. Compensation. In consideration of Contractor continuing to provide the Services described in Section I of the Agreement during the extended term of the Agreement, Section 4.1 shall be amended to increase the compensation paid to the Contractor by an additional amount not to exceed Eighteen Thousand Six Hundred Twenty and 00/100 ($18,620.00), and Washington State sales tax equal to One thousand Six Hundred Thirty-Eight and 56/100 Dollars ($1,638.56) for a total amount payable to the Contract not to exceed Twenty Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Eight and 56/100 Dollars ($20,258.56). The total amount payable to Contractor pursuant to tlie original Agreement and this First Amendment shall be an amount not to exceed Sixty Thousand Seven Hundred Forty- Five and 68/100 Dollars ($60,745.68). 7-L (Individual Notary] STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me, , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and on oath swore that he/she/they executed the foregoing instrument as his/her/their fTee and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal this ~ day of ,200_. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires :L,t¡ - 3 - MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# ;JZ.:(---4) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Amendment to extend Myers Master Lawn Carc Contract CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: 18J CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated March 20, 2003; Amendment to extend Myers Master Lawn Care Contract SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Myers Master Lawn Care has been providing landscape maintenance services to City HaJJ, Gateway Monument, Coronado, Heritage Woods, Lakota, and Wildwood Parks since May 2001, for an annual cost of$2I,756,9], with a total for the 2 year contract of$43,513,82 including tax. Staff recommends extending their contract for an additional year. The legal department has reviewed this contract amendment. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDA TlON: Move to recommend a "do pass" to fuJJ Council and authorize the City Manager to accept this amendment to extend the Myers Master Lawn Care contract for an additional one year for an annual cost of $22,4] 8.36 and a grand total of$65,932.] 8 and place this item before Council on May 6, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: "1 move approval of the Amendmcntto extend Myers Master Lawn Care Contract as presented. " ~~;~:~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~:=fID\ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # ] ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 SoH CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: March 20, 2003 PRHSPS Council Committee Steve Ikerd, Property Service~ttanagcr '2(Ç.... David Moseley, City Manage~lt\ Amendment to extend Myers Master Lawn Care contract Background: Myers Master Lawn Carc has been providing landscape maintenance services to City Hall, Gateway Monument, Coronado, Heritage Woods, Lakota, and Wildwood Parks since May 200], for an annual costof$21,756,91, with a total for the 2 yrcontract of$43,513,82 including tax, Recommendation: Staff recommends extending their contract for an additional one year for an annual cost of $22,4] 8.36, which reflects a rate and tax increase since the last contract. The total for the thrce- year contract is $65,932.18. The legal department has reviewed this contract amendment. Committee Recommendation: Motion to recommend a "do pass" to full Council and authorize thc City Manager to acccpt this amendment to extend the Myers Master Lawn Care contract for an additional one year for an annual cost of$22,4J 8.36 and a grand total of$65,932,] 8 and place this item before Council on May 6, 2003, APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: C~~~ t-l-I FIRST AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE/LABOR AGREEMENT FOR MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE DRAFT ~~3 This First Amendment ("Amendment") is dated effective this 1" day of May, 2003, and is entered into by and between the City of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City"), and Myers Master Lawn Care, a sole proprietorship ("Contractor"). A. The City and Contractor entered into a MaintenancelLabor Agreement dated effective May 1, 2001, whereby Contractor agreed to provide park landscape maintenance at City Hall, Coronado Park, Gateway Monument, Heritage Woods Park, Lakota Park and Wildwood Park, located in Federal Way, Washington ("Agreement"). B. Section 18.2 of the Agreement provided that the Agreement may only be amended by written agreement signed by the parties. C. The City and the Contractor desire to amend the Agreement to continue the Services described in Section 1 ofthe Agreement by extending the term ofthe Agreement and increasing the compensation paid to the Contractor. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions: l. Term. Section 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the term of the Agreement until April 30, 2004. 2. Compensation. Compensation. In consideration of Contractor continuing to provide the Services described in Section 1 of the Agreement during the extended term of the Agreement, Section 4.1 shall be amended to increase the compensation paid to the Contractor by an additional amount not to exceed Twenty Thousand Six Hundred Five and 11/100 ($20,605.11), and Washington State sales tax equal to One thousand Eight Hundred Thirteen and 25/100 Dollars ($1,813,25) for a total amount payable to the Contract not to exceed Twenty-two Thousand Four Hundred Eighteen and 36/100 Dollars ($22,418.36). The total amount payable to Contractor pursuant to the original Agreement and this First Amendment shall be an amount not to exceed Sixty-Five Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-Two and 18/100 Dollars ($65,932.18). H-L (Individual Notary] STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss, COUNTY OF ) On this day personalJy appeared before me, , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrwnent, and on oath swore that he/she/they executed the foregoing instrument as hislber/their fTee and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal this - day of- ,200_. (typed/printed name of notary) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires H-Y - 3 - MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# ~c<,) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Dumas Bay Centre, RoofMaintcnance Systcm, Final Acccptancc and Rcleasc of Rctainagc CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committcc Action Form datcd April 3, 2003; Dumas Bay Ccntrc, Roof Maintcnancc System, Final Acceptance and Release of Retainage, SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Prior to release of Retainage on any Public Works projcct, the City Council must acccpt thc work as complctc to mcct State Departmcnt of Rcvenuc and Dcpartment of Labor and Industrics requirements, Thc final cost for the roof maintenance system is $53,199,94. The contractor is Commercial Industrial Roofing Inc, The contractor completed the work within thc contract period and within budget. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to place this item on Councils May 6 conscnt agcnda with a "do pass" rccommcndation to accept the Dumas Bay Centre, roof maintenance system contract as complete and authorize staff to release retainage. The amount ofrctainage to release to Commercial Industrial Roofing Inc, is $2,371.10. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Dumas Bay Centre, Roof Maintenance System, Final Acceptancc and Release of Retainage as presented." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~.. (Bh'LOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.J City ofFcderaJ Way Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department MEMORANDUM Date: April 3, 2003 To: PRHSPS Council Committee From: Via: r,::~ Stevc Ikerd, Property ServiccsMlmagcr David Moseley, City Managcr~ t&o\ Subject: Dumas Bay Centre, Roof Maintenance System, Final Acceptance and ReJease of Retain age Background On September 17,2002 Council approved to contract with Commcrcial Industrial Roofing Inc "CIR " in the amount of $53,199.94 to repair the complete roof system at Dumas Bay Centre, Thc contractor complcted the work within the contract period and within budget. Prior to release of Retainage on any Public Works project, the City Council must accept the work as complete to meet State Department of Revenue and Department of Labor and Industries requirements, Recommendation Staff recommends the PRHSPS Council Committee to place the f01l0wing recommendation on the May 6, 2003 Council Consent Agenda: To accept the Dumas Bay Centre, roof maintenance system contract as complete and authorize staff to reI case retainage. The amount of retain age to release to Commercial Industrial Roofing Inc, is $2,371.] 0 Committee Recommendation Motion to place this item on Councils May 6th consent agenda with a "do pass" recommendation to acccpt the Dumas Bay Centrc, roof maintenance system contract as complete and authorize staffto rcleasc retainage. The amount of retain age to release to Commercia] Industrial Roofing Inc. is $2,371.10 =bcr J 3-1 77(~c!?~ Co mittec Member MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# Yf),) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Red, White and Blues Festival Fireworks RFP CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: [8] CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee action form dated April 7, 2003; Red, White and Blues Festival Fireworks RFP --.------------.-.--- _m......--- . SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Fireworks services are contracted with professional pyrotechnic vendors, The budget for fireworks is $15,000 annually; a two-year contract would total $30,000, In March, staff distributed a Request for Proposal for the provision of fireworks at the Red, White and Blues Festival on July 4 for 2003 and 2004. Vendors were requested to submit a proposal that would include a proposed budget based on $15,000 for 2003 and $15,000 for 2004, an inventory and explanation of product, the firm's previous experience, staffing, and references. Three submittals were received and two staff members and an employee of the Federal Way Fire Department compIetcd an evaluation of the firm's proposa1. The RFP evaluation reviewed the following items: 1. Responsiveness to Quote: 20% Well thought out, organized, easy to understand approach Appropriate safety precautions Site map attached and clear, easy to understand Understands specific issues of site and evaluated site Organized time schedule and task outline 2. Creativity, Variety and Content of Fireworks Display: Creative ideas with use of product Able to provide sound track Good variety of inventory 20% 3. Price: 30% Product Inventory Included Product Inventory Competitive Product Size Competitive (number of shells) A lot of "bang" for the buck Proposed budget includes products and tasks for 2003-04 4. Responsibility: 30% Experience with other community fireworks show 1.las well trained staff Three references provided Based on the above criteria the vendor's ranked as follows: 1.) 2). Entertainment Fireworks, 1nc,: This firm is a Washington firm, based in Olympia, This firm was the vendor for the fireworks show in 2001-2002, Western Display Fireworks: This is an Oregon firm, based in Canby, This is the first time they have submitted a bid for fireworks, In 2001-02 they opted not to submit a proposal. Child's Fireworks Display Co" Inc.: This is a Washington firm, based out of the Tacoma area, They are a new company and bid for the first time on the fireworks display, 3), u- --""""""-""""""""""-- ---"-""-""-"""-"-"-"-"--------"-""""""-"-""- - "-""""""""-- - ----""""""""----- - " """"" "-" " -- """"""" -"--"-"-""""""""-"-"- - -m""""""""-- - -" """"" "- U"""""" -----"" -""""" CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Motion to recommend to Council a "do pass" to authorize staff to negotiate a two-year contract with Entertainment Fireworks Inc, for a total $30,000 or $15,000 annually, and place this item before City Council on May 6, 2003 for approval. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Red, White and Blues Festival Fireworks RFP as presented." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: -~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLEDillEFEIUŒD/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1sT reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 S.B CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: Subject: April 7, 2003 PRHSPS Council Committee Mary Faber, Recreation and Çj,Iltural Services Coordinator David Moseley, City Manage~~ Red, White and Blues Festival Fireworks RFP Backl!round: A fireworks display is a part of every Red, White and Blues Festival held on July 4 each year. Fireworks services are contracted with professional pyrotechnic vendors, The budget for fireworks is $15,000 annually; a two-year contract would total $30,000. The previous contract executed in 2000 expired on January 1,2003. Staff issued an RFP for fireworks for and received three proposals. Two staff members and an employee ITom the fire district evaluated the proposals, The current vendor, Entertainment Fireworks Inc. received the highest ratings based on response to the proposal, competitive pricing and creativity. Committee Recommendation: Motion to rec¡~22 t~l:!llcil a "do pass" to authorize staff to negotiate a two-year contract with t8rtaiaFireworks Inc. for a total $30,000 or $15,000 annually, and place this item before City Council on May 6, 2003 for approval. 1)-\ MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# ~?I:-) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Parks Commission 2003/2004 Work Plan CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Committee Action Form dated April 14, 2003; Parks Commission 2003/2004 Work Plan, SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At their March 6 meeting, the Parks Commission identified their current and upcoming projects and planning issues that wi1l form the basis of their work plan for the remainder of2003 and into 2004, The Parks Commission passed a motion to forward to Council their work plan, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Move to recommend to Council a "do pass" to accept the Parks Commission 2003/2004 work plan as amended, and to place this item on councils May 6 Council Agenda under consent. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the Parks Commission 2003/2004 Work Plan as presentcd." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ....~... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 CITY Or rEDERAL WAY PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Via: SUBJECT: April 14, 2003 ~1 PRHSPS Council Committee (I.- Jennifer Schroder, Director . G:¡( 0" David Moseley, CIty Manager r-I ~ Parks Commission 2003/2004Work Plan S.F At the Parks Commissions March 6'" meeting, the commission passed a motion to forward to the Council the following work p Ian for annroval: TIMELINE 2003 ACTIVITY 1OT QTR 2NU QTR 3 QTR 4 QTR 1. Armstrong Property: Conduct public meetings 10 galher community input for park development. Recommend to Councii preferred altemative(s) Conduct nubiic nrocess for naminn a oark 2, Thompson Property: Conduct public meetings to gather community input for park deveiopment. Recommend to Council preferred alternative(s) Conduct nubiic orocess for namino a oark 3, Community Center: Chair to participate in Advisory Group for the Community Center. ~~.::'.::'~~~~~~;;;~~~nitor process and participate in the 4. Lakota Park: Update master Plan Conduct public meetings Recommend to Council nreferred master ian 5. Steel Lake Soccer Field renovation: Dedication ceremony 6. Sacajawea Park: Site improvement Pian, Conduct public meeting on aitemativeslimnrovements 7, Park Impact Fee: Review information on a park impact fee Provide recommendation to City Council on whether a park imnact fee shouid be considered 8, Kenwood Pit Property: Conduct public meeting to gather community input for park development. Input to be incorporated into parks CIP list of nro'ects for future fundinn 9. Bike Facility: Conceptual planning for location of a bike facility 10. Play ground: "o~IU\ P~ludes for 2003, funding for a.."",. play area at Lakota Par Commission to recommend the placement '{>c<u-- iocation and piay equipment elements. 11, Downtown Park: Coordinate with Community Deveiopment Services to determine/explore the location of and amenities within the I nark ?-<'-i~"-.ì Committee Recommendation: Move 10 recommend to Council a "do pass" to accept the Parks Commissions 2003/2004 work plan as ~, and to place this item on councils May 6" Council Agenda under consent û~ APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ~~~m~k P-\ her MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# ::Jl: () J CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: 2003 Human Services Commission Work Plan CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: rg¡ CONSENT 0 RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $0.00 $ $ ATTACHMENTS: 1) A memo to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety (PRHSPS) Committee dated April 14,2003. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Human Services Commission finalized their proposed 2003Work Plan at their March 17th meeting. The Work Plan is consistent with the Commission's roles and responsibilities as defined in City Ordinance #90-72. Highlights ofthe 2003 Plan include: learn more about current human services needs and gaps in the system; investigate CDBG options; review CDBG applications, and make recommendations to Council; learn about sub- regional planning efforts; review the performance of contracted agencies, tour funded agencies, collaborate and develop partnerships with service clubs, religious establishments, human services agencies and other community organizations, continue working with government entities, and marketing and outreach to increase Community awareness. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the April 14,2003 Parks, Recreation, Human Services, and Public Safety (PRHSPS) Committee meeting, the Committee voted to recommend approval ofthe Human Services Commission Work Plan with modifications. PROPOSED MOTION: I authorize Council Committee's recommendation to approve the Human Services Commission's 2003 Work Plan. ~~:~~--"~-;'-A~:~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Date: TO: From: Via: Subject: April 14, 2003 (Revised) Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Human Services Manager David Moseley, City Manager 2003 Human Services Commission Work Plan Backqround The Human Services Commission held a highly successful and effective annual retreat on March 17, 2003 at Dumas Bay. Council appointed one new Commissioner and two alternates at the beginning of the year, so this retreat was very beneficial to them. The Commission and staff also discussed what had been effective and proposed changes for the coming year to make the work easier and to better reach the community. The Commission and staff agreed to focus on awareness and education of human services programs at the community level, allowing those in need of the services better access to them. At this retreat, the Commission also finalized its proposed 2003 Work Plan, which is outlined as follows. 2003 Human Services Commission Work Plan Listed below is the Commission's proposed work plan for 2003 and the lead person assigned to work on each project. 1) Learn more about current human services needs and identify gaps in the human services system. Host a Community Forum in the Fall, to identify needs and gaps, Complete analysis of the 2000 census information for Federal Way. Needs Assessment Housing and Human Services - Phased as funding allows Lead: Ron Secreto, Kari Newport, David Larson and Staff. 2) Review Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Direct entitlement or stay in the King County Consortium (Timeline) CBDO Employment Project Funding recommendation for 2003 Additional Capital funds Conduct 2004 CDBG allocation processes and make recommendations to the Council. This includes review of the 2004 CDBG Pass Through Acceptance form and estimated funding available, review and evaluation of applications, applicant interviews, deliberations, recommendations to the City Council, and evaluation of the processes. Census Data Analysis Lead: Staff and Commissioners 3) Learn about sub-regional human services planning efforts Update on the South King County Human Services Forum I PRHSPS Human Services Work Plan Page -2- 04//4/03 Update on the South King Council of Human Services Follow information and provide input on ~County'-s,st<3tE)?rl(:LtE)dera_1 Human Services funding Update on Sub-Area Plan lead: Staff 4) Review the performance of contracted agencies (Human Services and CDBG) on a quarterly basis. lead: Staff 5) Tour Human Services agencies that receive City funding. Commissioners will sign up to visit two agencies and report back to the Commission. Prepare three basic questions to ask for ease of reporting and to narrow the purpose of the tour. lead: All Commissioners 6) Develop Partnerships with service clubs, churches, human services agencies, Federal Way Public Schools and the Greater Federal Way Chamber of Commerce to increase coordination and collaboration on human services issues. Explore other funding sources and opportunities as the budget for human services continues to decline. Consider using the City's cable channel to promote City funded human services programs by showing agency videos on the channel. lead: Dave larson and Staff 7) Staff and cGommission members will continue working closely with all levels of G4y government by: monitorinq meetinqs where human services fundinq decisions are made. alertinq the Council to those decisions, 3ttending City Council Cind Council Committee mootingc and emphasizing the need to maintain a strong level of Human Services funding in the City budget process. lead: Commission members 8) Review evaluating Human Services Application and a biennium process lead: Staff, Rick Agnew and Richard Bye 9) Marketing f Outreach to increase Community awareness of Human Services. Consider using the City's Cable Channel to promote City funded Human Services programs by showing agency videos on the channel Create brochures for distribution and display at local stores, restaurants and public areas. lead: David larson and Vicki Bunker Summary 2 PRHSPS Human Services Work Plan Page -3- 04/14/03 The Commission is committed to assuming and fulfilling these responsibilities and is confident that the 2003 Work Plan will enable the Commission and staff to provide the Community with a clear service delivery system. If you have any questions about the Work Plan or any other Human Services issues, please contact Lydia Assefa-Dawson, Human Services Manager, at 253-661-4039, Committee Recommendation 1. Approve the Human Services Commission's 2003 Work Plan, as proposed by the Commission and forward to the full Council for approval on May 6, 2003. § Approve the Human Services Commission's 2003 Work Plan as amended by the Committee and forward to the full Council for approval on May 6, 2003, MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# Z( Þ7 ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Purchase of Storage Trailer CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: r8J D D CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ A TT ACHMENTS: Memorandum from Chief Kirkpatrick to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public SafetY regarding the purchase of storage trailer for storage of traffic control cones. SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: To provide Emergency Vehicle Operations Course (EVOC) Training to police officers, the Department purchased several thousand dollars of traffic cones in 2002. The traffic cones are currently being stored in Building C. This room is also used by the Firearms Unit, Records and is also used as a drying room for evidence, The storage area is inadequate to serve all these functions. The traffic cones are consistently moved around to accommodate other equipment stored in the room. When transporting the equipment, the EVOC Team has to use a truck to move the cones and this requires at least an hour to load the equipment using three officers. In addition to overtime cost, valuable time would be lost in the event of a major incident in which traffic cones are required. The purchase of a storage trailer will reduce the overtime costs to the Department and the constant hassle of moving the cones to accommodate other units within the Department. The total purchase price for the 6 x 12 storage trailer is $3,173.70, The source of funding will come from the Traffic Account. The maintenance and operational cost associated with the purchase is $400 per year. The life expectancy of the trailer is about 15 years, which places the replacement reserves at $350 per year (inflation built in), An existing vehicle with a hitch system will be used to tow the trailer. Replacement reserve for 2002 will be funded ITom the Traffic Account and the remaining years from the Public SafetY Budget. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the April 14, 2003 meeting, the Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public SafetY Committee recommended that the purchase of storage trailer be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the May 6, 2003 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: Move to approve the purchase of a storage trailer. CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ....~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.M City of Federal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Council Committee Anne Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police 0 ( -(C. . David Moseley, City ManagelAtliiT' .~'",."'~ , , From: Via: Date: April 14, 2003 Subject: Purchase of Storage Trailer for Traffic Cones Backl!round: To provide Emergency Vehicle Operations Course (EVOC) Training to police officers, the Department purchased several thousand dollars of traffic cones in 2002, The traffic cones are currently being stored in Building C. This room is also used by the Firearms Unit, Records and is also used as a drying room för evidence, The storage area is inadequate to serve all these functions. The traffic cones are consistently moved around to gain access to other equipment within the room. When transporting the equipment, the EVOC Team has to use a truck to move the cones and this requires at least an hour to load the equipment using three officers. In addition to overtime cost, valuable time would be lost in the event of a major incident in which traffic cones are required, The purchase of a storage trailer will reduce the overtime costs to the Department and the constant hassle of moving the cones to accommodate other units within the Department. The total purchase price for the 6 x 12 storage trailer is $3,173.70, The source of funding will come from the Traffic Account. The maintenance and operational cost associated with the purchase is $400 per year. The life expectancy ofthe trailer is about 15 years, which places the replacement reserves at $350 per year (inflation built in). An existing vehicle with a hitch system will be used to tow the trailer. Replacement reserve for 2002 will be funded from the Traffic Account and the remaining years from the Public Safety Budget. Start-up Costs: The cost details are attached, The following table summarizes the costs and identifies the funding sources, The total city fund needed for this acquisition is $3,173.70. M-I Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve the purchase ofthe Storage trailer and authorizing the purchase ofthe trailer will cost the city $3,173.70 from the Traffic Account. There will be savings in overtime costs in the upcoming years as a result of this acquisition. Please forward to full Council for Consideration at its May 6, 2003 meeting, VProjectslEVOC Trailer purchase VYì-'L MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# ITh\ CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL ::::E::~y: !d~~~~;~~~;. x 0 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memo fÌom Chief Anne Kirkpatrick to the Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Public Safety Committee regarding the Interloca1 Cooperative Agreement between Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and The Port of Seattle, for Creation of the Valley Special Response Team, and the actual lnterlocal Agreement, SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: King County and the municipalities within the Puget Sound area have experienced increasingly violent criminal confrontations due to increased gang activity, increased drug abuse, increased urbanization, and increased population densities. The ability to safely control, contain, and resolve criminal conduct such as civil disobedience, barricaded subjects, hostage situations, gang member arrests, high risk felony arrests, and narcotic/high risk search warrants has strained resources of the members' individual police department specialty teams, Pursuant to Chapters 10,93, 39,34, and 53,08 of the Revised Code of Washington, the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to enter into an Interloca1 Cooperative Agreement between Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and The Port of Seattle, for Creation of the Valley Special Response Team. This agreement allows the above agencies to establish and maintain a multi-jurisdictional team to effectively respond to serious criminal occurrences,. A multi-jurisdictional effort to handle specific serious criminal confrontations, as well as weapons of mass destruction, will result in more effective pooling of personnel, improved utilization of municipal funds, reduced duplication of equipment, improved training, development of specialized expertise, and increased utilization/application of a combined special response team, The results of a multi-jurisdictional effort will be improved services for the citizens of all participating jurisdictions, increased safety for officers and the community, and improved cost effectiveness. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the April 14, 2003 Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee meeting, it was recommended that the InterlocaI Cooperative Agreement between Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and The Port of Seattle, for Creation of the Valley Special Response Team be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the May 6, 2003 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and The Port of Seattle, for Creation of the Valley Special Response Team, CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~. (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: 0 APPROVED 0 DENTED 0 TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION 0 MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 5.K City of Federal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY Date: April 14, 2003 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & Publ~c Safety Council Committee Anne E. Kirkpatrick, Chief of Police ",.,1";(: ,-.,~ (/2",. David Moseley, City Manger~{ß"" Valley Special Response Team From: Via: Subject: ßack!!round: King County and the municipalities within the Puget Sound area have experienced increasingly violent criminal confrontations due to increased gang activity, increased drug abuse, increased urbanization, and increased population densities, The ability to safely control, contain, and resolve criminal conduct such as civil disobedience, barricaded subjects, hostage situations, gang member arrests, high risk felony arrests, and narcotic/high risk search warrants has strained resources of the members' individual police department specialty teams. Pursuant to Chapters 10.93, 39.34, and 53.08 of the Revised Code of Washington, the City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to enter into an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and The Port of Seattle, for Creation of the Valley Special Response Team. This agreement allows the above agencies to establish and maintain a multi-jurisdictional team to effectively respond to serious criminal occurrences, Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept this request for an Interlocal Agreement between Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and The Port of Seattle for the creation of the SRT, and forward to full Council for consideration at its May 6, 2003 meeting, APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ~t!!~ ommlttee Member \(-\ INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUBURN, FEDERAL WAY, KENT, RENTON, TUKWILA, AND THE PORT OF SEATTLE, FOR CREATION OF THE VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM DRAFT "Ý/cf/ ÔJ> I. PARTIES The parties to this Agreement are the Port of Seattle and the municipalities of Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, and Tukwila, each of which is a municipal corporation operating under the laws of the State of Washington. II. AUTHORITY This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Chapters 10.93, 39.34, and 53.08 of the Revised Code of Washington. III. PURPOSE The parties hereto desire to establish and maintain a multi-jurisdictional team to effectively respond to serious criminal occurrences as described below. IV. FORMATION There is hereby created a multi-jurisdictional team to be hereafter known as the "Valley Special Response Team" ("SRT"), the members of which shall be the Port of Seattle, and the cities of Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, and Tukwila. As special needs arise, it may be necessary to request from other law enforcement agencies assistance and/or personnel, at the discretion of the SRT Incident Commander and/or the SRT Tactical Commander. V. STATEMENT OF PROBLEM King County and the municipalities within the Puget Sound area have experienced increasingly violent criminal confrontations due to increased gang activity, increased drug abuse, increased urbanization, and increased population densities. The ability to safely control, contain, and resolve criminal conduct such as civil disobedience, barricaded subjects, hostage situations, gang member arrests, high risk felony arrests, and narcotic/high risk search warrants has strained resources of the members' individual police department specialty teams, Law enforcement efforts directed at dealing with these violent confrontations have, for the most part, been conducted by law enforcement agencies working independently. A multi-jurisdictional effort to handle specific serious criminal confrontations, as well as weapons of mass destruction, will result in more effective pooling of personnel, improved utilization of municipal funds, reduced duplication of equipment, improved training, development of specialized expertise, and increased utilization/application of a VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM 1 OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT combined special response team. The results of a multi-jurisdictional effort will be improved services for the citizens of all participating jurisdictions, increased safety for officers and the community, and improved cost effectiveness. VI. TEAM OBJECTIVES The individual specialty units from each participating jurisdiction will be consolidated and combined to form the SRT, The SRT shall service each participating jurisdiction, The SRT shall also be available to outside law enforcement agencies as provided by chapter 10.93 RCw. The objective of the SRT shall be to provide enhanced use of personnel, equipment, budgeted funds, and training. The SRT shall respond as requested by any of the participating jurisdictions and provide a coordinated response to high-risk incidents. VII. DURATION AND TERMINATION The minimum term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year, effective upon its adoption. This Agreement shall automatically be extended for consecutive one (1) year terms, unless terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. A jurisdiction may withdraw its participation in the SRT by providing written notice of its withdrawal, and serving such notice upon each Executive Board member of the remaining jurisdictions, A notice of withdrawal shall become effective ninety (90) days after service of the notice on all participating members. The SRT may be terminated by a majority vote of the Executive Board. Any vote for termination shall occur only when the police chief of each participating jurisdiction is present at the meeting in which such vote is taken. VIII. GOVERNANCE The affairs of the team shall be governed by an Executive Board ("Board"), whose members are composed of the police chief, or his/her designee, from each participating jurisdiction. Each member of the Board shall have an equal vote and voice on all Board decisions. All Board decisions shall be made by a majority vote of the Board members, or their designees, appearing at the meeting in which the decision is made. A majority of Board members, or their designees, must be present at each meeting for any actions taken to be valid. A presiding officer shall be elected by the Board together with such other officers as a majority of the Board may decide. There shall be a minimum of four (4) Board meetings each year. One meeting shall be held in March of each year to review the prior year's service. Another meeting shall be held in August of each year to review and present a budget to the participating jurisdictions, At least two (2) other meetings shall be held each year to review the SRT's activities and policies. The presiding officer, or any Board member, may call extra meetings as deemed appropriate. The presiding officer shall provide no less than forty-eight (48) hours notice of all meetings to all members of the Board; PROVIDED, VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT however, that in emergency situations, the presiding officer may conduct a telephonic meeting or poll of Board members to resolve any issues related to such emergency. The Board shall develop SRT written policies, regulations, and operational procedures within ninety (90) calendar days of the execution of this Agreement. The SRT written policies, regulations, and operational procedures shall apply to all SRT operations, Thus, to the extent that the written policies, regulations, and operational procedures of the SRT conflict with the policies, regulations, and operational procedures of the individual jurisdictions, the SRT written policies, regulations, and procedures shall prevail. IX. STAFF A Tactical Commander, which shall be a command level officer, shall be appointed annually by the Board to act as the principal liaison and facilitator between the Board and the members of the SRT. The Tactical Commander shall operate under the direction of the presiding officer of the Board, The Tactical Commander shall be responsible for informing the Board on all matters relating to the function, expenditures, accomplishments, training, number of calls that the SRT responds to, problems of the SRT, and any other matter as requested by the Board. The Tactical Commander may be removed by action of the Board at anytime and for any reason, with or without cause, The Tactical Commander shall prepare monthly written reports to the Board on the actions, progress, and finances of the SRT. In addition, the Tactical Commander shall be responsible for presenting rules, procedures, regulations, and revisions thereto for Board approval. Each jurisdiction shall contribute seven (7) full-time commissioned officers, which shall include at least one (1) Sergeant or other first level supervisor, to be assigned to the SRT. The personnel assigned to the SRT shall be considered employees of the contributing jurisdiction. The contributing jurisdiction shall be solely and exclusively responsible for the compensation and benefits for the personnel it contributes to the SRT. All rights, duties, and obligations of the employer and the employee shall remain with the contributing jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable laws with regard to employees and with provisions of any applicable collective bargaining agreements and civil service rules and regulations. The Board may appoint the finance department of a participating jurisdiction to manage the finances of the SRT. Before appointing the finance department of a particular jurisdiction to manage the finances of the SRT, the Board shall consult with the finance department of the jurisdiction and obtain its approval. The duty of managing the finances of the SRT shall be rotated to other participating jurisdictions at the discretion of the Board. The Board may, at its discretion, appoint one (1) or more legal advisors to advise the Board on legal issues affecting the SRT. The legal advisor(s) shall be the legal representative(s) for one or more of the jurisdictions participating in the SRT. The legal VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT advisor(s) shall, when appropriate or when requested by the Board, consult with the legal representatives of all participating jurisdictions before rendering legal advice. X. COMMAND AND CONTROL During field activation of the SRT, an Incident Commander, SRT Tactical Commander, and SRT Team Leader(s) will be designated. The duties and procedures to be utilized by the Incident Commander, the SRT Tactical Commander, and the SRT Team Leader(s) shall be set forth in the standard operating procedures approved by the Board, The standard operating procedures approved by the board may designate other personnel to be utilized during an incident. XI. EQUIPMENT, TRAINING, AND BUDGET Each participating jurisdiction shall acquire the equipment of its participating SRT members. Each participating jurisdiction shall provide sufficient funds to update, replace, repair, and maintain the equipment and supplies utilized by its participating SRT members. Each participating jurisdiction shall provide sufficient funds to provide for training of its participating SRT members. The equipment, supplies, and training provided by each jurisdiction to its personnel participating in the SRT shall be equal to those provided by the other participating jurisdictions. Each member jurisdiction shall maintain an independent budget system to account for funds allocated and expended by its participating SRT members. The Board must approve any joint capital expenditure for SRT equipment. XII. DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS UPON TERMINATION Termination shall be in accordance with those procedures set forth in prior sections. Each participating jurisdiction shall retain sole ownership of equipment purchased and provided to its participating SRT members. Any assets acquired with joint funds of the SRT shall be equally divided among the participating jurisdictions at the asset's fair market value upon termination. The value of the assets of the SRT shall be determined by using commonly accepted methods of valuation, If two (2) or more participating jurisdictions desire an asset, the final decision shall be made by arbitration (described below). Any property not claimed shall be declared surplus by the Board and disposed of pursuant to state law for the disposition of surplus property. The proceeds from the sale or disposition of any SRT property, after payment of any and all costs of sale or debts of the agency, shall be equally distributed to those jurisdictions participating in the SRT at the time of dissolution in proportion to the jurisdiction's percentage participation in the SRT as of the date of dissolution. In the event that one (1) or more jurisdictions terminate their participation in the SRT, but the SRT continues to exist, the jurisdiction terminating participation shall be deemed to have waived any right or title to any property owned by the SRT or to share in the proceeds at the time of dissolution. VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT Arbitration pursuant to this section shall occur as follows: A. The jurisdictions interested in an asset shall select one (1) person (Arbitrator) to determine which agency will receive the property. If the jurisdictions cannot agree to an Arbitrator, the chiefs of the jurisdictions participating in the SRT upon dissolution shall meet to determine who the Arbitrator will be. The Arbitrator may be any person not employed by the jurisdictions that desire the property. B. During a meeting with the Arbitrator, each jurisdiction interested in the property shall be permitted to make an oral and/or written presentation to the Arbitrator in support of its position. C. At the conclusion of the presentation, the Arbitrator shall determine which jurisdiction is to receive the property. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and shall not be the subject of appeal or review. XIII. LIABILITY, HOLD HARMLESS, AND INDEMNIFICATION It is the intent of the participating jurisdictions to provide services of the SRT without the threat of being subject to liability to one another and to fully cooperate in the defense of any claims or lawsuits arising out of or connected with SRT actions that are brought against the jurisdictions. To this end, the participating jurisdictions agree to equally share responsibility and liability for the acts or omissions of their participating personnel when acting in furtherance of this Agreement. In the event that an action is brought against any of the participating jurisdictions, each jurisdiction shall be responsible for an equal share of any award for or settlement of claims of damages, fines, fees, or costs, regardless of which jurisdiction or employee the action is taken against or which jurisdiction or employee is ultimately responsible for the conduct. The jurisdictions shall share equally regardless of the number of jurisdictions named in the lawsuit or claim or the number of officers from each jurisdiction named in the lawsuit or claim. This section shall be subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in subsections A through G below. A. B, Jurisdiction Not Involved In SRT Response. In the event that a jurisdiction or its personnel were not involved in the SRT response to the incident that gives rise to a claim or lawsuit, and judgment on the claim or lawsuit does not, in any manner, implicate the acts of a particular jurisdiction or its personnel, such jurisdiction shall not be required to share responsibility for the payment of the judgment or award. Intentionallv Wronqful Conduct Bevond the Scope of Emplovment. Nothing herein shall require, or be interpreted to require indemnification or payment of any judgment against any SRT personnel for intentionally wrongful conduct that is outside of the scope of employment of any individual or for any judgment of punitive damages against any individual or jurisdiction. Payment of any award for punitive damages shall be the VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT F. G, sole responsibility of the person or jurisdiction that employs the person against whom such award is rendered. C. Collective Representation and Defense. The jurisdictions may retain joint legal counsel to collectively represent and defend the jurisdictions in any legal action. Those retaining joint counsel shall share equally the costs of such representation or defense. In the event a jurisdiction does not agree to joint representation, the jurisdiction shall be solely responsible for all attorneys fees accrued by its individual representation or defense. The jurisdictions and their respective defense counsel shall make a good faith attempt to cooperate with other participating jurisdictions by, including but not limited to, providing all documentation requested, and making SRT members available for depositions, discovery, settlement conferences, strategy meetings, and trial. D. Removal From Lawsuit. In the event a jurisdiction or employee is successful in withdrawing or removing the jurisdiction or employee from a lawsuit by summary judgment, qualified immunity, or otherwise, the jurisdiction shall nonetheless be required to pay its equal share of any award for or settlement of the lawsuit; PROVIDED, however, that in the event a jurisdiction or employee is removed from the lawsuit and subsection (A) of this section is satisfied, the jurisdiction shall not be required to pay any share of the award or settlement. E, Settlement Process. It is the intent of this Agreement that the jurisdictions act in good faith on behalf of each other in conducting settlement negotiations on liability claims or lawsuits so that, whenever possible, all parties agree with the settlement or, in the alternative, agree to proceed to trial. In the event a claim or lawsuit requires the sharing of liability, no individual jurisdiction shall be authorized to enter into a settlement agreement with a claimant or plaintiff unless all jurisdictions agree with the terms of the settlement. Any settlement made by an individual jurisdiction without the agreement of the remaining jurisdictions, when required, shall not relieve the settling jurisdiction from paying an equal share of any final settlement or award. Defense Waiver. This section shall not be interpreted to waive any defense arising out of RCW Title 51. Insurance. The failure of any insurance carrier or self-insured pooling organization to agree to or follow the terms of this section shall not relieve any individual jurisdiction from its obligations under this Agreement. VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT XIV. NOTICE OF CLAIMS, LAWSUITS, AND SETTLEMENTS In the event a claim is filed or lawsuit is brought against a participating jurisdiction or its employees for actions arising out of their conduct in support of 3RT operations, the jurisdiction shall promptly notify the other jurisdictions that the claim or lawsuit has been initiated. Any documentation, including the claim or legal complaints, shall promptly be provided to each participating jurisdiction, Any jurisdiction or member who believes or knows that another jurisdiction would be liable for a claim, settlement, or judgment that arises from a 3RT action or operation, shall have the burden of notifying each participating jurisdiction of all claims, lawsuits, settlements, or demands made to that jurisdiction. In the event a participating jurisdiction has a right, pursuant to section XIII of this Agreement, to be defended and held harmless by another participating jurisdiction, the jurisdiction having the right to be defended and held harmless shall promptly tender the defense of such claim or lawsuit to the jurisdiction that must defend and hold the other harmless. XV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW The 3RT and all its members shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws that apply to the 3RT. XVI. ALTERATIONS This Agreement may be modified, amended, or altered by agreement of all participating jurisdictions and such alteration, amendment, or modification shall be effective when reduced to writing and executed in a manner consistent with paragraph XX of this Agreement. XVII. RECORDS Each jurisdiction shall maintain training records related to the 3RT for a minimum of seven (7) years. A copy of these records will be forwarded and maintained with the designated 3RT Training CoordinatoL All records shall be available for full inspection and copying by each participating jurisdiction. XVIII. FILING Upon execution hereof, this Agreement shall be filed with the city clerks of the respective participating municipalities, the Director of Records and Elections of King County, the secretary of state, and such other governmental agencies as may be required by law. XIX. SEVERABILITY If any part, paragraph, section, or provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of any remaining section, part, or provision of this Agreement. VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT XX. MUNICIPAL AUTHORIZATIONS This Agreement shall be executed on behalf of each participating jurisdiction by its duly authorized representative and pursuant to an appropriate resolution or ordinance of the governing body of each participating jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be deemed effective upon the last date of execution by the last so authorized representative. This Agreement may be executed by counterparts and be valid as if each authorized representative had signed the original document. By signing below, the signor certifies that he or she has the authority to sign this Agreement on behalf of the jurisdiction, and the jurisdiction agrees to the terms of this Agreement. Mayor, City of Auburn Date City Attorney, City of Auburn Date City Clerk, City of Auburn Date Mayor, City of Renton Date Date City Attorney, City of Renton City Clerk, City of Renton Date Date City Attorney, City of Tukwila Date Mayor, City of Tukwila City Clerk, City of Tukwila Date Mayor, City of Kent Date City Attorney, City of Kent Date City Clerk, City of Kent Date City Manager, City of Federal Way Date City Attorney, City of Federal Way Date City Clerk, City of Federal Way Date Executive Director, Port of Seattle Date Port Counsel, Port of Seattle Date '"",wmo~~"......,w,,--......,",~~..- VALLEY SPECIAL RESPONSE TEAM OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# =:IT (0 ) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: CATEGORY: ~ CONSENT X RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 0 ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum from CniefKirkpatrick to PRHS&PS regarding the Special Olympics Washington Resolution, and the actual Resolution The City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to create A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, to endorse the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs to designate Special Olympics Washington as an Official Non-Profit Charity Organization, The City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, supports the ideals and principals of the Special Olympics Washington, and desires to endorse the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs fund raising efforts. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the April 14, 2003 Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Committee meeting, it was recommended to accept the request for A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, endorsing the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs designation of Special Olympics Washington as an Official Non- Proíìt Chanty Organization, and forward to City Council for consideration at its May 6, 2003 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: I move approval of the Resolution of the City Council ofíhe City of Federal Way, Washingíon, endorsing the Washingíon Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs designation of Special Olympics Washington as an Official Non-Profit Charity Organization, CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - 05/10/2001 S.L City (¡fFederal Way CITY COUNCIL PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES, AND PUBLIC SAFETY Date: April 14, 2003 To: Parks, Recreation, Human Services & ~IiC Safety Council Committee Anne E. Kirkpatrick, Chief of POliClj£,--{. From: Via: David Mo Subject: Back!!round: The City of Federal Way Department of Public Safety requests approval to create A Resolution of the City Council ofthe City of Federal Way, Washington, to endorse the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs to designate Special Olympics Washington as an Official Non-Profit Charity Organization. The City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, supports the ideals and principals of the Special Olympics Washington, and desires to endorse the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs fund raising efforts, Committee Recommendation: Motion to approve and accept this request for A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Federal Way, Washington, endorsing the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs designation of Special Olympics Washington as an Official Non-Profit Charity Organization, and forward to full Council for consideration at its May 6, 2003 meeting. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT: ~~ é? h4 Co Ittee Member L-\ RESOLUTION NO. DRAFT 57í ~ó 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, ENDORSING THE WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF SHERIFFS AND POLICE CHIEFS DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON AS AN OFFICIAL NON-PROFIT CHARITY ORGANIZATION. WHEREAS, the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs have designated Special Olympics Washington as the non-profit charity organization to support; WHEREAS, the City Council ofthe City of Federal Way, Washington, supports the ideals and principals of the Special Olympics Washington, and desires to endorse the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs fund raising efforts; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Endorsement of Special OlvlllPics Washington. The fund raising efforts ofthe Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs for the Special Olympics Washington is hereby endorsed by the City. Section 2. Severabi1itv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed, Res. #_, Page 1 Section 4, Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this - day of , 2003. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON CITY ATTORNEY, FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. k:\resolspecial olympics rev, 9/5/02 Res. #_, Page 2 MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# ::s:r:()) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: Steel Lake Management District ---.-..---.-------.-.----..-.- .--.--.---.-----..---.--.--.-.--..---.---.--. -._._.r:~:::::~g::::: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ CATEGORY: 0 ~ 0 CONSENT RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Land Use I Transportation Committee dated April 15, 2003 and Resolution to form Steel Lake Management District Number I. SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Over the past ten years, the City of Federal Way has worked with residents living adjacent to Steel Lake on management of Eurasian water milfoi1, a non-native invasive aquatic plant. Surveys to identifY miIfoiI were conducted in 1995, 1996, 1998,2001, and 2002, Chemical treatment to kill the plant was conducted in 1994 and 2002. The main source of the milfoi1 re-introduction to the lake is from the public boat launch owned by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. During 2002 and 2003, the City met with residents around the lake to develop a long-term management strategy for aquatic plants in Steel Lake. Neighborhood meetings were held in June, July, and November of 2002, and April of 2003. At the July 2002 neighborhood meeting a Steel Lake Committee was formed to work on identifYing methods to fund Iong- term lake management activities. During 2002, the Committee met and consulted with several lake management experts to evaluate funding options. In November 2002, the Committee recommended to the residents the formation of a lake management district pursuant to RCW 36.61. There was unanimous support from approximately 35 residents present to form a lake management district. The Committee was then charged with developing a scope of activities, budget and rate structure for the lake management district. During the first quarter of 2003, the Committee addressed these items and presented a petition to form a lake management district at a neighborhood meeting in April 2003. All residents at the meeting were supportive of the committee's recommended lake management district scope, budget, and rate structure and signed the petition. The final petition has signatures representing 25 of the 102 parcels adjacent to the lake, The residents' petition conforms to the requirements of RCW 36.61. The petition identifies a list of lake management activities to be conducted, the duration and boundaries of the district, a proposed rate structure, and a request for the formation of a Steel lake Advisory Board to oversee the district. The first step to initiate the Jake management district formation process is the adoption of a Resolution of Intention that includes setting a date for a public hearing. The entire administrative process is expected to take nine months. In addition to lake management funding activities, the Steel Lake Committee was also been advising the City on an update of the Aquatic Plant Management Plan ITom 1995- Update of the plan is a requirement of the new permitting scheme when applying aquatic herbicides in Washington State. An updated plan is required in 2004. In addition, the plan forms the basis for the proposed lake management district activities, A final draft of the plan, renamed the 2003 Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan, was presented at the April 2003 neighborhood meeting for public review. The plan will be submitted to the Department of Ecology thIs year for final adoption before the 2004 growing season. ~ Fëderal Way DATE: April 15,2003 TO: Eric Faison, Chair Land Use and Transportation Committee i'i J \)~ Leslie Ryan-Connelly ESAINPDES Coordinator, nager FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND Over the past ten years, the City of Federal Way has worked with residents living adjacent to Steel Lake on management of Eurasian water milfoiI, a non-native invasive aquatic plant. Surveys to identify milfoil were conducted in 1995, 1996, 1998,200 I, and 2002, Chemical treatment to kill the plant was conducted in 1994 and 2002. The main source of the milfoil re-introduction to the lake is from the public boat launch owned by the Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife. During 2002 and 2003, the City met with residents around the lake to develop a long-term management strategy for aquatic plants in Steel Lake. Neighborhood meetings were held in June, July, and November of 2002, and April of2003. At the July2002 neighborhood meeting a Steel Lake Committee was fonned to work on identifying methods to fund long-term lake management activities. During 2002, the Committee met and consulted with several lake management experts to evaluate funding options. In November 2002, the Committee recommended to the residents the formation of a lake management district pursuantto RCW 36.61, There was unanimous support from approximately 35 residents present to fonn a lake management district. The Committee was then charged with developing a scope of activities, budget and rate structure for the lake management district. During the first quarter of 2003, the Committee addressed these items and presented a petition to form a lake management district at a neighborhood meeting in April 2003. All residents at the meeting were supportive of the committee's recommended lake management district scope, budget, and rate structure and signed the petition. The final petition has signatures representing 25 of the 102 parcels adjacent to the lake. The residents' petition conforms to the requirements of RCW 36.61. The petition identifies a list of lake management activities to be conducted, the duration and boundaries of the district, a proposed rate structure, and a request for the formation of a Steel lake Advisory Board to oversee the district. The first step to initiate the lake management district formation process is the adoption of a Resolution ofIntention which includes setting a date for a public hearing. The entire administrative process is expected to take nine months. In addition to lake managemcnt funding activities, the Steel lake Committee was also been advising the City on an update of the Aquatic Plant Management Plan from 1995. Update of the plan is a requirement of the new permitting scheme when applying aquatic herbicides in Washington State. An updated plan is required in 2004, In addition, the plan forms the basis for the proposed lake management district activities. A final draft of the plan, renamed the 2003 Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan, was presented at the April 2003 neighborhood meeting for public review, The plan will be submitted to the Department of Ecology this year for final adoption before the 2004 growing season, RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends placing the following items on the May 6, 2003, City Council consent agenda for approval: Adopt a Resolution oflntention to initiate the Steel Lake Management District formation process and set a public hearing date for June 17,2003 regular City Council meeting. cc: Project File Day File k:\lutc\2003\steellakc management districtdoc DRAft tf( 3 ()jð3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, TO FORM STEEL LAKE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 1 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FORMATION OF THE PROPOSED DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way completed the Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Management Plan in December of 1995 and updated this plan in April of2003 (renamed the Steel Lake Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan) (the "Plan") (Attachment A); and WHEREAS, the Plan was initiated because of citizen interest in the long-term protection of Steel Lake; and WHEREAS, Steel Lake contains significant natural resources, such as wetlands, and forms the headwaters for Redondo Creek; and WHEREAS, the existing lake quality supports fishing, wildlife habitat, swimming, boating, visual aesthetics, waterfront property values, irrigation, and other beneficial uses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.21.403 and RCW 36,61, a lake management district can be formed to generate funds for financing lake improvement and maintenance projects as recommended in the Steel Lake Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way is committed to a good faith effort of continuing these activities; and WHEREAS, the Steel Lake community has demonstrated support for the formation of a lake management district through submittal of a petition (Attachment B) pursuant to the requirements of RCW 36.6 I; and Res. # Page I WHEREAS, the hearing notice requirements of RCW 36.61 will provide an opportunity to evaluate property owner interest in lake management district activities. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Intention to Form Steel Lake Management District. The City of Federal Way City Council declares, by passing this resolution, its intention to conduct the activities required by RCW 36.61 for the establishment of Lake Management District Number 1 (Steel Lake) (The "District"). The nature of the proposed activity to be undertaken by the District is the continued implementation of the Steel Lake Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan. Special assessments totaling $13,598 will be collected annually to finance the District activities, with the total amount to be collected during the life of the District being $166,440, which includes an automatic inflation increase based upon the Seattle Consumer Price Index not to exceed five percent in any given year. The proposed duration ofthe District is ten years from the date such District is actually formed by ordinance. The proposed boundaries ofthe District encompass all properties adjacent to Steel Lake with lake front footage. The proposed rate structure is based on equal charges for similar parcels. Undeveloped parcels will be charged $30 per year. Single family developed parcels will be charged $85 per year. The multi-family parcels will be charged $275 per year. The City of Federal Way parcel will be charged $2,048 per year. The Department ofFish and Wildlife parcel will be charged $3,500 per year. Section 2. Public Hearing. A public hearing conducted by the City of Federal Way City Council shall be held on the formation ofthe proposed District: DATE: June 17,2003 TIME: 7:00 pm or shortly thereafter Res. # Page 2 PLACE: City of Federal Way City Hall 35530 1st Way South Federal Way, W A Section 3. Establishment of Advisory Committee. If Lake Management District Number 1 is formed, the City of Federal Way City Council will establish a non-paid Advisory Board of lakefi'ont property owners representative of the diversity among property owners around Steel Lake to oversee the implementation of the Lake Management District program and to assist the City of Federal Way in establishing annual budgets and work plans for the use of Lake Management District revenues and expenditures. The Advisory Board will meet regularly as determined by the Board, propose annual budgets for Lake Management District expenditures to the City of Federal Way, educate its neighbors on Lake Management District issues, and submit annual reports of Lake Management District activities to the City of Federal Way. Section 4. Public Notice. The City of Federal Way Clerk is hereby directed to publish and mail notices as required by RCW 36,61. Section 5. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase ofthis resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 7. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. Res. # Page 3 RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this day of ,2003. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, MC APPROVED AS TO FORM: PATRICIA ~CHARDSON, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Res. # Page 4 FINAL DRAFT Attachment "A" STEEL LAKE IA VMP APRIL 3, 2003 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 f NAL DRAFT PROBLEM STATEMENT Steel Lake is located in the City of Federal Way in King County, Washington. It is a small (47 acres), shallow (maximum depth 24 feet, mean depth 13 feet) lake with a watershed area of 304 acres that is primarily developed as residential and commercial property. The only source of surface water inflow to the lake is from city stormwater outfalls. In the past decade, infestations of non-native aquatic plants Eurasian watermilfoi1 (Myriophyllum spicatum) and fragrant water lily (Nymphae odorata) have occurred on several occasions that colonized lake areas in large quantities. Because Steel Lake is a shallow system, a large portion of the surface area of this lake is available for aquatic weed colonization. Aquatic weed infestations on Steel Lake, such as those exhibited by M Spicatum (milfoil), are well documented. In the early 1990s, the lake became fully infested with milfoil, which dominated the entire littoral zone, Extensive milfoi1 colonies near the beach, shoreline, and homeowner docks posed serious threats to swimmers - and significantly reduced native plant communities. In addition, the public fishing dock was surrounded by milfoil beds that made fishing from the shore nearly impossible. A whole- lake application using fluridone (Sonar@) in 1994 was required to treat the aquatic plant problem. In 2001, mi1foil re-infested Steel Lake, this time appearing as a pioneering colony. It was spot treated with 2,4-D (AquaKleen@) in August of2002. It is likely that milfoil is being spread on boats that enter the lake at the public boat launch. These boats tend to travel from lake to lake in the Federal Way region. Because Star Lake and Lake Killamey are within a few miles distance of Steel Lake, they (and other nearby systems) are threatened with introductions of mil foil if Steel Lake is not controlled. Non-native fragrant water lily, a noxious weed, continues to colonize the western end of the lake and other scattered areas where water depths are limited, The lilies, in combination with the very shallow water depth have greatly restricted use of this portion of the lake. Large sections of root and plant masses break away and float to the surface of the lake, forming unsightly clumps and causing potential boating safety problems. Through the years, individual homeowners have implemented lily treatment and control, but these efforts are offset if adjacent properties are not maintained. Consequently, the lake requires a comprehensive aquatic weed management approach, Aquatic weed infestations in Steel Lake threaten the investment that Steel Lake residents have made to protect their property values and to preserve the lake's aesthetic beauty, 2 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 fiNAL recreational attributes, and wildlife habitat. The Steel Lake Community recognizes that a concerted, long-term effort is necessary to control future aquatic weed infestations. The facts listed above were used to create a problem statement for Steel Lake, The purpose of the problem statement is to describe as clearly as possible how the lake and it's inhabitants are being negatively impacted by aquatic plants. Problem Statement Aquatic plants, including the non-native species Myriophyllum spicatum, (milfoil) in Steel Lake historically have impaired the use and aesthetic value of the lake. Dense aquatic plant beds have restricted access, fishing, swimming, sailing, and other types of boating to the mid-section of the lake, due to the obstruction caused by plants in the shallower, near shore area. In 1993, milfoil was reportedly colonizing areas up to the 15-foot depth interval. In addition, other regional lakes are in danger of becoming infested with milfoil originating in Steel Lake. Because of the lake's shallow characteristic, submerged plants have the potential to restrict the available area for recreation activities. The non-native lily, Nymphaea sp., (fragrant water lily) continues to colonize a large portion of the west end of the lake. The lilies, in combination with the very shallow water depth, have greatly restricted use of this portion of the lake. Personal efforts to control the lilies are offset if adjacent properties are not also maintained, and consequently suffer from the need for a lake-wide approach. Large sections of root and plant masses break away and float to the surface of the lake, forming unsightly clumps and create potential boating safety problems. Property values may be affected by the plant problems. This may be especially true of the western end of the lake, where water depth limitations in combination with lily beds are causing the "waterfront" to move farther from the existing shoreline. A long-term strategy is required for the control of aquatic plants, and to assure that milfoil does not become re-established in the lake. MANAGEMENT GOALS The Steel Lake Steering Committee has developed the following set of management goals for the long-term management of aquatic weeds in Steel Lake: 3 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 F! . Form a Lake Management District that creates a funding source for all future aquatic plant management activities, and continue to seek grant opportunities. Perform annual diver surveys to monitor changes in the aquatic plant community. Control and contain both milfoi1 populations and fragrant water lily populations at as Iowa density as is environmentally and economically feasible, and at levels that will not impact public safety or the beneficial uses of the lake. Reduce all other identified species of noxious weeds as listed in WAC 16-750 to levels that do not impact public safety or the beneficial uses of the lake. Use appropriate aquatic plant control and treatment methods as needed for all other problematic aquatic weeds, using the best available science to identify and understand their effects on human, aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems prior to implementation. Provide for adequate native vegetation for fish and, if necessary, mitigate for any negative impacts to fish habitat due to non-native plant removal activities. Continue public education to prevent the introduction of noxious weeds, nuisance plants and non-native animal species to the lake; and to aid -in the early detection of aquatic weed re-infestations. Continue to involve the Steel Lake Community in the aquatic plant management process, . . PAST MANAGEMENT EFFORTS Prior to 1993, lake homeowners optioned to contract individually to have their near shore areas sprayed with glyphosate (Rodeo@) to control lilies. In 1993, the lake became heavily infested with milfoil. That year, the City of Federal Way and the Steel Lake Residents' Association (SLRA) formed an advisory committee, and began aquatic plant management planning. The city and SLRA agreed to combine funds to eradicate the milfoil infestation. In the spring of 1994, fluridone (Sonar@) was applied by Resource Management (RMI). In 1993, the City of Federal Way received an Aquatic Weeds Management Fund Grant from the Department of Ecology to provide long-term aquatic plant control. The A WMF Grant was used to contract with Envirovision for the development of an Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan (IA VMP). The IA VMP was completed in December 1995, and approved by the Department of Ecology in February 1996. Funds collected by the SLRA, combined with a city match, were applied toward several post-treatment lake surveys. A I-year post treatment aquatic plant survey performed by RMI in 1995 demonstrated that milfoil had not re-infested the lake. Additional follow-up systematic surveys performed by Herrera Environmental Consultants in 1996 and 1998 4 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 f indicated that the lake had remained free of mil foil. Between 1998 and 2001, no aquatic weed management efforts (surveys, control, treatment, or public meetings) took place. In the summer of 200 1, the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks (through a grant provided by the Department of Ecology), contracted with AquaTechnex (formerly RM1) to survey Steel Lake for noxious weeds. This simple survey confirmed that a pioneering level of milfoil had re-established itself in the lake. In the fall of2001, the City of Federal Way provided notification of this re-infestation to all affected residents, primarily those concentrated along the northwest portion of the lake. Thereafter, the city began to develop a strategy for future aquatic weeds management. In early 2002, the City applied for an Early Infestation Grant from the Department of Ecology for short-term mi1foil identification, treatment, and control. Following the award of the grant, AquaTechnex was given city approval to perform a comprehensive underwater survey for mi1foil in August. In the interim, the city organized two well-attended (more than thirty people each) Steel Lake Residents' meetings in June and July of2002 to discuss lake management issues, including future treatment options and funding alternatives. An overview of the Lake Management District (LMD) formation process was presented at these two public meetings. In order to discuss and plan aquatic plant management in further detail, volunteers were solicited to form the Steel Lake Steering Committee. The underwater survey performed by Aqua Technex in August 2002, specific for milfoil, indicated that the noxious aquatic weed had spread throughout the littoral zone of the lake, colonizing a total of five acres. In late August, the lake was spot treated with 2,4-D (AquaKleen@). A follow-up visual evaluation performed approximately 5 weeks later verified that the treatment produced a significant weed kill. The Integrated Treatment Plan outlined in this IA VMP will address the future management of mil foil infestations. In addition, some Steel Lake residents elected to spot treat their waterfront for white water lily in 2002 using Glycosate, Again, Aqua Technex applied the aquatic herbicide, contracting individually with the interested homeowners. A brief post-treatment evaluation indicated a moderate lily population reduction. Systematic lake surveys planned for 2003 will confirm the effectiveness of the lily treatment, and define future action, In late 2002, the Steel Lake Steering Committee began to lay the groundwork for a long- term and effective aquatic weed management program. The Committee began meeting on a monthly basis to formulate a work plan. The feasibility of forming a LMD was closely examined and discussed. During this time, industry professionals from both the public and private sectors were consulted concerning the LMD process. The Committee recognized that the Department of Ecology (DOE) is a strong proponent of special purpose districts for managing lakes; STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 and that future DOE grant awards were more likely if a Steel Lake LMD was formed. These factors led to an agreement that a LMD would be the best solution in providing a stable source of funds for aquatic plant management activities, On November 13, 2002, a Steel Lake Community public meeting was held to present the Committee LMD recommendation. An informal straw vote showed unanimous support for LMD formation. As of March 2003, the Steel Lake Committee is pursuing formation of the LMD through the district formation process defined in RCW 36.61. LAKE AND WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS Location The Steel Lake watershed is located approximately 20 miles south of Seattle, in the City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, The watershed is 304 acres in size and drains a gently sloping topographic area with elevations ranging from 440. feet to 500 feet (Figure 1). The maximum depth is 24 feet, and the mean depth is 13 feet. Lake depth contours are depicted in Figure 3. A Sediment Type Map for Steel Lake is depicted in Figure 4. The entire watershed of Steel Lake lies within the City of Federal Way, Land Use Land use in the watershed is primarily comprised of single-family residences (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Table 1). Steel Lake Park, multi-family residences, and vacant land comprise most of the remaining land in the watershed. It should be noted that the sub- basin boundary in Figure 1 and land use estimates in Table 1 are for Redondo Creek sub- basin CPR3, which includes an additional acreage to the north and west of the lake outlet. In addition, thirteen percent (13%) of the Central Puget Sound basin, which includes the Steel Lake and Redonodo Creek watershed, is available for re-deve10pment, including 21 parcels on Steel Lake (11 vacant and lOre-developable). There are 631 residential properties in CPR3, Table 1. land Use Estimates for the Steel lake Watershed (Subbasin CPR3) Land Use Classification Commercial Industrial Multi-Family Office (Acres) 2.9 0.2 11.1 2.8 (Percent) 0.96 0.07 3.6 0.92 6 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 1=1 Common Ownership Park Quasi-public Religious Services Single Family Vacant Steel Lake Wetlands 1.7 24.6 2.2 3.8 149.8 47.0 47.4 10.4 0.57 8.1 0.73 1.2 49.3 15.4 15.6 3.4 Watershed 303 100 TOTAL 303 Shoreline Use Steel Lake includes 7,123 feet of shoreline (Table 2), The majority of the shoreline includes lake frontage adjacent to single-family property (5,315 feet), Public access to the lake is from Steel Lake Park, owned and managed by the City of Federal Way. The Park is located on the south shore of the lake, and includes a public beach area. A public boat launch, also located on the south shore near the park, is owned by the Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW). There are eleven (11) undeveloped parcels around the lake. The largest undeveloped parcel (092104 9012) is located at the northwest comer, and has a shoreline measuring 332 feet, with a portion classified as wetland. Table 2. Shoreline Use Estimates for Steel Lake Shoreline Use Total Frontage % (It) Single family residential 5315 75 Steel Lake Park 875 12 Undeveloped Parcels 477 6.7 Multi-family 392 5.5 Public Boat Launch 64 0.9 Stream and Wetland Locations Steel Lake forms the headwaters of Redondo Creek, Outflow from the lake generally occurs only during the wet season (November through June). The lake outlet drains in a northwest direction from the west end of the lake, passing through a wetland 10 a culvert crossing at South 304th Street. The outlet continues to flow in a northwest direction, passing underneath Pacific Highway South and eventually discharging into Puget Sound at Redondo Beach in the City of Des Moines, Runoff from the wetland, open space, and development near the northwest portion does not drain into the lake. 7 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Wetlands in the Steel Lake Watershed have been mapped by the US Department ofFish and Wildlife as part of the National Wetland Inventory (NW1, 1987). Wetlands in Steel Lake proper have been identified as either open water wetland (lacustrine-limnetic) or aquatic bed wetland (lacustrine-littoral). This wetland areas was surveyed by Sheldon & Associates for the City of Federal Way in 1998, which identified it as a Category I wetland as defined by Federal Way city code. The vegetation of the wetland complex was described as a palustrine-scrub- shrub/forested-seasonally flooded wetland adjacent to Steel Lake and a palustrine- emergent-semi-permanently flooded wetland toward the beginning of Redondo Creek. On February 24,2003, a search was conducted by the Washington Department of Natural Resources of the National Heritage Program database for information on rare plants and high quality native ecosystems in the Steel Lake watershed, There is no information on significant features within this study area (Moody, 2003, DNR). Non-point Nutrient Source Locations The majority of surface water is conveyed to the lake from the 304-acre watershed through the city's stormwater system, and enters the lake via 14 stormwater outfalls located around the perimeter. (Figure 1). The largely urbanized nature of the watershed can be expected to contribute typical urban area nutrient-related pollutants to the lake, in particular nitrogen and phosphorous, Significant pollutant sources in the watershed - including landscaping, gardening, large flocks of Canada geese at Steel Lake Park, and vehicle washing - all have the potential to contribute nutrients into the lake. Lakeshore residences and most of the development in the watershed are connected to the Lakehaven Utility District sanitary sewer system. Lakehaven Utility District does not have a record of a documented sanitary sewer overflow in the Steel Lake region. In addition, Lakehaven does not have records concerning on-site household septic systems (Asbury, 2003, personal communication). Failing septic systems may also be a source of pollutants such as nutrients and bacteria to Steel Lake, The 1995 Steel Lake IA VMPA reported that approximately 35 acres of single-family residences, located in the northwest and northeast portions of the watershed, were served by on-site septic systems (Federal Way Water and Sewer and RP A, 1992). The King County Health Department does not maintain a list or map of household septic systems, or the incidence of septic system failure in the Steel Lake watershed. Information and as-builts may only be obtained through a request that includes details concerning the specific address or parcel (Bishop, 2003, KC Health). Large concentrations of non-point nutrients can increase the biological productivity of the lake, and stimulate plant growth. Data collected by the King County Lake Stewardship Volunteer Monitoring Program include levels of nitrogen and phosphorous; and concentrations of phytoplankton and chlorophyll. This information is used to calculate the Trophic State Index (TSI) for the lake, a measurement if the lake's health. The most 8 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL up-to-date water quality data and TSI values provided by King County Lake Volunteers are included in the Water Quality section of the IA VMP. The City of Federal Way is participating in a Canada geese management program at Steel Lake Park with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). In 2002, nuisance flocks of geese were removed from the park as a part of this program. In successive years, Parks Department staff will employ non-lethal geese management techniques (using bird- bangers and other harassment tools) to control populations. A reduction in numbers of Canada geese visiting the park will result in a reduction in nutrients entering the lake. Water Source Steel Lake, located in the City of Federal Way, is 46 acres in size with a watershed area of243 acres. Steel lake is relatively shallow with a mean depth of 13 feet, a maximum depth of 24 feet, and a lake volume of 600 acre-feet. Physical characteristics of Steel Lake are summarized in Table 3. The majority of surface water enters the lake via 14 stormwater outfalls located around the perimeter of the lake (Figure 1). No streams flow into the lake. Table 3. Physical Characteristics of Steel Lake and Its Watershed Characteristic English Units Metric Units 304 acres 98.3 hectares 47 acres 18.6 hectares 600 acre-It 7.4 x 105 cubic meters 24 feet 7.3 meters 13 feet 4.0 meters 440 feet 134.1 meters 1.3 miles 2.1 kilometers 0.77 timeslyear 0.77 times/year Watershed area Surface area lake volume Maximum depth Mean depth lake altitude Shoreline length Flushing rate Water Quality The assessment of biological activity (or trophic state) can be classified into three general categories of lake water quality: oligotrophic, mesotrophic, and eutrophic. Lakes with low concentrations of nutrients and algae and high transparency (or clarity) are considered oligotrophic. A lake with high concentrations of nutrients and algae and low transparency is considered eutrophic, Lakes whose quality ranges between eutrophic and oligotrophic are considered mesotrophic. 9 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 One of the most common measures used to calculate a lake's water quality classification is the numerical trophic state index (TSI) developed by Robert Carlson (1977). This index allows the easy comparison of lake water quality by relating values for water clarity, phosphorous, and chlorophyll a along a trophic continuum based on a scale of 0 to 100 (Table 4). Table 4. Summary of Summer Water Quality Parameters and Associated Values for the Trophic State Index Secchi Depth Chi-a" (ug/L) TP" (Ug/L) TSI" Trophic Statel Bioiogical (meter) Activity Oligotrophic/Low >4.0 <2.6 <12 <40 Mesotrophic/Moderate 2.0-4.0 2.6-6.4 12-24 40-50 Eutrophic/High <2.0 >6.4 >24 >50 'Data Source: Carlson, 1977 ,. Chl-a chlorophyll a, TP = total phosphorous, and TSI = trophic state index The King County Volunteer Lake Monitoring Program for Steel Lake began in the 1980s, and has continued through 2001, with a gap from1991 through 1993. The following data indicate that Steel Lake is relatively low in primary productivity (borderline oligotrophic to mesotrophic) with very good water quality. No significant trends in water quality were found based on the data record (A Trend Report on King County Small Lakes, November 2001), See historical TSI values for Steel Lake represented in Table 5. Table 5. Averaae Values for Select Trophic Parameters at Ste Year # Secchi Chi-a" TP" TSI" TSI TSI TSI Samples (meter) (ug/L) (Ug/L) Secchi Chi a TP Ave 1985 12 3.5 2.6 16 42 40 44 42 1986 11 3.4 3.9 16 43 44 44 44 1987 11 3.4 3.1 15 42 43 43 43 el Lake* 10 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 1988 1 3.6 3.6 15 42 43 43 42 1989 12 3.0 4.1 18 44 46 46 45 1990 9 2.9 5.0 16 45 44 44 45 1991 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1992 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - 1993 -- -- -- - - - -- -- 1994 12 3.6 4.6 24 42 50 50 46 1995 12 3.7 5.3 19 41 46 46 45 1996 10 3.9 4.2 17 40 45 45 43 1997 12 3.5 3.8 21 42 48 48 44 1998 13 3.4 5.1 13 42 41 41 43 1999 12 3.7 4.3 12 41 40 40 42 2000 8 4.6 3.3 11 38 39 39 40 'Dala Source: A Trend Report on King County Small Lakes, November 2001 " Chl-a chlorophyll a , TP=lolal phosphorous, and TSI=lrophic state index In 2001, Secchi transparency ranged from 1.0 to 6.0m through the year based on both Level I and Level II records. Water levels rose steadily through winter and dropped steadily after April. Annual water temperatures ranged from 4.5 to 22.5 degrees Celsius. Appendix A includes 2001 Secchi Depth graph (Figure 14),2001 Precipitation/Lake Level graph (Figure 15), and 2001 Lake Temperature graph (Figure 16). Phytoplankton made a peak in June 2001, and the population was climbing at the end of the sampling season, Early populations ofthe diatom Cyclotella were replaced by the chrysophyte Dinobryon and the b1uegreen Anabaena at peak volume in June 2001. A variety of taxa were present over the summer, but none made a large population until October 2001 when another Dinobryon species began to increase rapidly. Chlorophyll content did not relate closely to the phytoplankton maximum in June 2001 , but did show an increase in October 2001. Oscillatori sp., a blue-green algae, was found in small quantities in 2000 and 2001. Moderate blooms of Oscillatori sp. were noted in 2002, and generated a number of citizen complaints. The City of Federal way responded to these complaints by issuing a mild health notice to Steel Lake residents concerning the toxic effects of the algae. See Appendix A for 2001 Phytoplankton and Chlorophyll concentrations (Figures 17,18). Total phosphorus and total nitrogen remained in proportion to each other through the sampling period, with the N:P ratio ranging from 23 to 35. In 2001, the TSI indicators were close together, just above the threshold between oligotrophy and mesotrophy. In 2000, the values were close together, but just below the threshold. Before 2000, relationships changed between the indicators, but all three values were never close 11 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 together. See Attachment A for 2001 Total Phosphorous/Total Nitrogen graph (Figure 19). The primary source of pollutants to Steel Lake is likely stormwater runoff discharged from 14 outfalls located at various points on the shoreline, in addition to the runoff that enters the lake directly from shoreline property, Typical pollutants of concern in urban runoff include; suspended solids, nutrients, bacteria, fertilizers, pesticides and toxic substances (e,g., metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) Elfish (1986). Eutrophication over time is a process that occurs naturally in some lakes and may be accelerated in others by human activities- An acceleration of the eutrophication process may result from normal daily activities that occur in the urban environment. For example, automobiles and road surfaces contribute metals and petroleum products and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, gardening, cleaning and other household activities contribute fertilizers, pesticides, nutrients, and various toxic substances. There is no data available to determine whether these pollutants exist in Steel Lake, and no current evidence of toxic effects. In addition, increases in impervious surfaces associated with land development activities, also result in increased quantities of surface water runoff flowing to the lake. These larger surface water flows often carry loads of nutrients and sediments that stimulate plant growth. This process may result in the overall eutrophication process (A Trend Report on King County Small Lakes, 2001). The Central Puget Sound basin, which includes the Steel Lake basin, is 43% impervious cover. Beneficial and Recreational Uses Table 6 contains a list of characteristic or beneficial uses that Steel Lake provides to area residents, visitors, and wildlife, In particular, the lake supports a large city park, excellent wetland habitat, and a trout-stocking program. It is also important to note that no motorized boats are allowed on the lake. Table 6. List of Beneficial Uses for Steel lake Beneficial Use Location Swimming Around homes and in City park ----- Non-motorized Boats Entire Lake 12 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAfT Fishing Whole lake (Fishing derby at park site) Sailing Whole lake Waterfowl Habitat Concentrated along western shore Aesthetic enjoyment In lake and surrounding shoreline Birdwatching Throughout the lake Irrigation One water right and three claims exist Wetland Habitat Near the lake outlet (western end of the lake) Wildlife Habitat Crayfish, turtles, and frogs primarily near shore Trout Stocking Deep water habitat (No trout spawn in the lake.) City park Approximately 700 feet of shoreline Fish Habitat Spawning (warmwater fish) occurs near docks and lilies in the west end. No salmon spawn in the lake. Wildlife Aquatic noxious weeds (non-native species) can adversely affect the ecological functions and aesthetics in lakes and streams by crowding out native vegetation and creating single species stands, Therefore, it is important to recognize the value of native plant species for fish and wildlife (WDFW, Aquatic Plants and Fish), The fish and wildlife habitat in Steel Lake will greatly improve by removing non-native aquatic plant species (milfoil, fragrant water lily, yellow flagjris), allowing the native vegetation to thrive. Steel Lake is managed by the Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW) as a trout and warm-water fishery. Between 1947 and 1969, the lake was rehabilitated on five occasions by treating with rotenone to reduce populations of spiny-ray fish, and was stocked each year with approximately 7,000 recently hatched (fry) rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Due to the mixed species character of the fish community and the poor survival of trout fry, the fish management program changed in the 1970's by eliminating rotenone treatments and by stocking with trout of catchable size (i.e. between 8 and 12 inches long) in the spring of each year (Pfeifer 1995 personal communication), During 1985 and 1995, a total of 46,635 trout were allotted for release into Steel Lake, During this period, surveys identified the presence of the following other fish species: largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides1 yellow perch (Percajlavescens), pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus), and brown bullhead (Jctalurus melas). Since 1991, an average of 6,000 trout were released into the lake each year. In most years, half of the trout were released directly into the lake during April, prior to opening day of 13 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 fiNAL DRAF1" the fishing season. The other half were released during June into a pen near the Steel Lake fishing pier for the opening day fishing derby. Trout not caught in the pen were released into the lake, WDFW stocked Steel Lake in April of2002. Stocking included: 4,600 rainbow trout (8"-12"); and 650 triploid rainbow trout (sterile, trophy-sized), On May 13 and 16,2002, WDFW conducted a survey of Steel Lake.to determine fish populations, organized by species count and length measurements. WDFW staff used electro-fishing boat, and gull and tyke nets during the survey. Table 7 contains the results ofthis survey. Table 7. Steel lake Total Fish counts by Species and length Increments WDFW Survey 2002 Total # 621 148 79 16 37 Sampled Percent 68.9% 16.4% 8,8% 4,1 1.8% Species Yellow Largemouth Pumpkin - Rainbow Brown Perch Bass seed Trout Bullhead Size (inches) 1-4 4 88 51 0 0 4-7 415 49 28 0 2 7-11 202 7 0 37 12 11-14 0 1 0 0 2 14-17 0 1 0 0 0 17-19 0 2 0 0 0 In addition, several red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) were captured during the 2002 WDFW survey. This exotic, aquatic-nuisance species is native to the south central United States, and was most likely introduced to Steel lake as a result of it's use as live bait by anglers, or during an aquarium dumping incident. The impact of this introduction is unknown, but most have had negative consequences (Mueller, WDFW). Red swamp crayfish are voracious herbivores, and may compete against native crayfish for food sources, presenting implications for Steel Lake if they multiply dramatically. Efforts to control red swamp crayfish in Steel Lake will be focused on public education. Signage, provided by the Department of Ecology, is in place at the public boat launch that visually identifies the species and warns lake-users of their presence. Lake residents will also be instructed to destroy the nuisance red swamp crayfish when captured. 14 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 The Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW) conducted a search of the non-game data system for known occurrences of threatened, endangered, and sensitive species of animals in the watershed, Bald eagle nests have been sighted adjacent to Puget Sound, approximately 2 miles west of Steel Lake. In addition, a great blue heron rookery (breeding area) is present 2,5 miles southeast of the lake, Although these species may visit Steel Lake no sightings of these or other priority (sensitive) species have been reported at Steel Lake (Thompson, 1995, pers. comm.). Other priority species that may visit the lake include the following cavity-nesting ducks: wood duck, Barrow's goldeneye, common goldeneye, bufflehead, and hooded merganser. Aquatic Plants and Algae The aquatic plant community in Steel Lake was surveyed by Metro in 1976, 1978, and 1979; by Resource Management, Inc. (RMI) in 1994 and 1995; by Herrera Environmental Consultants in 1996 and 1998; by AquaTechnex in 2001 and 2002; and by in 2003. The relative presence, density, and areal coverage of aquatic plants fÌ'om 1976 through 2003 is summarized in Table 8. The scope and methodologies of each of these surveys were not similar. For example, some surveys were for all aquatic vegetation and some were only for milfoil and species identification was not consistent. Caution should be used when comparing the surveys The following are narratives describing aquatic plant community information and surveys from 1976 to 2003: 1976 -1993 Metro Surveys During this time period, aquatic plants inhabited approximately 27 acres (59 percent) of the lake (Figures 5 and 6), with submerged macrophytes and macroalgae comprising approximately 18 acres (67 percent) ofthe total plant area, and floating-leaved plants (waterli1ies) comprising the remaining 9 acres (33 percent). Comparison of the 1979 and 1994 pre-treatment survey results indicate that although the total area coverage of submerged macrophytes did not change, the relative density of these plants increased. Therefore, the plant composition changed to include stands of mil foil. During the same time period, the area coverage of submerged macroalgae increased, while floating-leaved plants (waterlilies) decreased, The decrease in waterlilies was primarily due to approved herbicide (glyphosate) treatments in addition to non-chemical controls (i.e. mechanical harvesting, bottom barriers, and hand cutting) that occurred during this time period. 1994 Survey Immediately prior to the 1994 Sonar @ treatment, submerged macrophytes were present in 7.8 acres of the area currently occupied by Nilella (May 1994, Figure 7). Native pondweeds (Potamogeton amplifolius and P. pusillus) dominated the submerged macrophyte community. Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), was present in 15 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAFT 1.3 acres of the lake, Milfoil was not detected during the September 1994 survey (Figure 8). 1995 RMI Survey The RMI survey conducted in May 1995 showed no significant change when compared to the September 1994 post-treatment survey. Aquatic plants inhabited 35 acres (76 percent) of the lake, with submerged macroalgae (Nitella sp.) comprising 31.4 acres (90 percent) of the total plant area. Floating-leaved plants, primarily consisting ofwaterli1ies (Nymphaea odorata and Nuphar lutea spp. variegata), comprised the remaining 3.6 acres (10 percent). Waterli1y growth was characterized by a large population which grew to a maximum depth of 5 feet at the west end of the lake. A few small patches of waterli1y were also distributed along the remaining shoreline, Submerged macrophytes such as Large-leaf pond weed (Potamogeton amplifolius) and thin-leaf pondweed (Potamogeton pusillus) were present between depths of 5 and 10 feet at densities too sparse to map. Although they are not shown in the figures, small stands of emergent plants grew along 1,400 feet (20 percent) of the shoreline, covering a total area ofOA acres. Yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus) and cattail (Twha sp.) dominated the emergent plant community. Marsh cinquefoil (Potentilla palustris) and rushes (Juncas sp. and Eleocharis palustris) were also present (RMI 1994, 1995; Parsons 1995 personal communication). 1996 Herrera Survey An aquatic plant underwater survey was conducted on July 1 and 2, 1996. The survey was intended to document the presence, condition, and abundance of aquatic plant species in Steel Lake (Figure 9). Phytoplankton growth reduced visibility to approximately 10 feet, thus a limited area of the lake was surveyed. This level of effort was considered adequate by Herrera personnel for the purposes of the evaluation. Neither mi1foil nor other submerged, non-native, and invasive aquatic plants were present in the area surveyed. The composition, distribution, and density of the aquatic plant community was reported to be similar to that observed prior to the 1994 lake treatment with Sonar@. Floating-leafed plants were dominated by fragrant waterlily, and distributed similarly as was documented in 1994 (at the west end of the lake). The only variation included a reduction in a small area between transects 49 and 53; and between transects 47 and 49 near the north shore. Submerged macroalgae dominated the aquatic plant community, and again was similar to 19941evels. Chara schweinitzii dominated the shallow region (shoreline to 12 feet); and Nitella flexilis dominated the deeper region ofthe lake between 12 and 17 feet. These populations appear to have been recovering from the 1994 Sonar@ treatment, but had not become dense enough to significantly impair the recreational use of the lake, 16 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAfT Submerged macrophytes were typically present at relatively low densities (less than 25 percent coverage). Their distribution, density, and diversity appeared to have increased since the 1994 post-treatment survey - but not to nuisance levels. Small-leafed pondweed, (or thin-leafed pondweed), Potamogelon pusillus, was the dominant submerged macrophyte reported. 1998 Herrera Survey An aquatic plant underwater survey was conducted on June 15 and 17, 1998. The survey was intended to document the presence, condition, and abundance of aquatic plant species in Steel Lake. Survey methods employed were similar to those used in 1996. Neither milfoi1 nor other submerged, non-native aquatic plants were present in the area surveyed. Native species of submerged macrophytes and macroalgae were present in a healthy condition along each transect from shore to a maximum depth of approximately 15 feet (Figure 10). Floating-leafed plants were dominated by fragrant waterli1y, and distributed similarly as was documented in the 1998 survey. Again, as in 1996, Polamogelon pusillus, (small-leaved pondweed) was the dominant submerged macrophyte. Nqjas fexilis (naiad) was commonly present in shallow waters less than 8 feet deep. The distribution of naiad was higher in 1998 than in 1996. Submerged macroalgae dominated the aquatic plant community again in 1998. Chara schweinilzii dominated the shallow region (less than 8 feet); and Nilellaflexilis dominated the deeper region of the lake between 12 and 15 feet. These populations were still not dense enough to significantly impair the recreational use of the lake. 2001 AquaTechnex Survey This survey, conducted in the summer of2001 for King County through a grant from the Department of Ecology, was very limited. Mi1foil plants were found along the north shoreline during the diver survey of the lake (Figure 11). The milfoil colonies were estimated to be less than 3 acres in size, and at a pioneering level of infestation. The report stressed the threat posed to other local water bodies, and indicated that the objective should be eradication of the milfoil. It recommended that an intense survey of the littoral zone of the lake be conducted in 2002 to detect expansionofthe population. In addition, the report pointed out that Steel Lake would be eligible for a Department of Ecology Early Infestation Grant, which should be pursued by the appropriate jurisdiction. A yearly budget of $1 0,000 was presented that would cover aquatic plant management efforts if the control program started in 2002. The report warned that it was probable that the weed would expand dramatically by 2003 if no action were taken, and that a Sonar@ treatment protocol might then be required to remove this plant. The estimated cost for this approach would be $38,000. 2002 AquaTechnex Survey 17 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 On August 16, a complete underwater survey was conducted to identify and map all milfoil plants and their densities. Milfoil was found in several locations throughout the littoral zone, with the southwest corner exhibiting the largest and most dense (heavy) colonies, Lesser dense colonies (moderate) were found along the eastern shoreline and in the bay in the north eastern corner of the lake. Most of the northern shoreline of the lake contained small patches (sparse) around residential docks (Figure 12). The size of the milfoil plants ranged from single stems 6-12 inches long, to multiple stems 2-5 feet long originating from a single root crown. Many milfoil plants in the southwest corner of the lake had reproductive structures (flowers) above the surface of the water. At the time of the survey, milfoil was estimated to be colonizing approximately five (5) acres. The survey indicated the presence of more than 50 milfoil plants. Diver hand removal, diver dredging and/or application of bottom burlap barriers were deemed to be impractical for the extent of infestation. AquaTechnex obtained an general NPDES Noxious Weed Permit to apply the aquatic herbicide 2,4-D (AquaK;Jeen@). On August 26, affected areas of Steel Lake was treated with 2,4-D by spray gun at a rate of 100 pounds per acre. On August 27 and 30, City of Federal Way Surface Water Management (SWM) staff collected post treatment lake samples pursuant to the Early Infestation Grant Agreement with the Department of Ecology. Samples were collected using a Wi1dco Alpha 2.2 liter Van Dorn style water bottle. Samples were retrieved from various depths, and combined into individual composite samples. Samples were analyzed for chlorinated herbicides by USEPA 8151 GC/MS Modified. Concentrations of2,4-D were unexpectedly low. On September 30, SWM staff inspected the lake to determine the effectiveness of treatment. Low light conditions prevented an accurate evaluation. On October 4, SWM staff accompanied AquaTechnex staff, and concluded that there were no surviving milfoil plants in the treated areas (north, eastern, and western portions) of the lake. The dead plants were brown in color, stripped of leaves, with only dead stems connected to their root crowns. No reproductive structures remained above the surface of the water. 2003 Survey In$~rt~oÞii!>urvey info in .Sprirlg AQUATIC PLANT CHARACTERIZATION 18 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Plant Type Description Based upon the findings contained in the 2003 Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Survey, the following includes the characteristics of the dominant species for each type of aquatic plants: Emergent; Rooted Floating-Leaved Plants; Submerged Macrophytes; and Submerged Macroalgae. The 2003 Steel Lake aquatic plant survey found three (3) listed noxious weed species: Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), fragrant water lily (Nymphaea odorata), and yellow flag iris. These species will be the focus of the plant management efforts on Steel Lake. Noxious weeds are legally defined by Washington's Noxious Weed Control Law (RCW 17.10). The term "noxious weed" refers to those non-native plants that are highly destructive, competitive, or difficult to control once established. Noxious weeds have usually been introduced accidentally as a contaminant or as ornamentals. Non-native plants often do not have natural predators (i.e. herbivores, pathogens) or strong competitors to control their numbers as they may have had in their home range. WAC 16.750 sets out three classes (A, B, C) of noxious weeds based on their distribution in the state, each class having different control requirements, County Weed Boards are given some discretion as to setting control priorities for Class Band C weeds. Native Plant Species NA TIVE EMERGENT PLANTS There are no dominant native Emergent Plant types noted in Steel Lake. NA TlVE ROOTED FLOA TING-LEA VED PLANTS There are no dominant native Rooted Floating-Leaved Plant types noted in Steel Lake, NA TlVE SUBMERGED MACROPHYTES Small-leafed pondweed (Potamogeton pusillus) (The following information was obtained in part from the Department of Ecology website) Small and leafy pondweeds grow in similar habitats and look alike, They also resemble other aquatic plants with thin leaves and delicate stems. These pondweeds have long, narrow leaves and, except for an occasional flower spike that briefly rises above the water, they remain underwater for their entire lives, Because the narrow leaved 19 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 DRAFT pondweeds look so much alike, close attention must be paid to minute details to distinguish between them. The stem is slender and profusely branched, often having with small paired yellowish glands at the leaf base. The flower appears in 1-4 whorls on spikes measuring 3-15 mm long, not always above the water. The root is fibrous, from the base of the plant, and is often non-rhizomatous. The plant's seeds and winter buds form at the lateral branch tips and near the leaf bases. It's seeds and vegetation provide cover and food for aquatic animals. Naiads (Naja flexilis) (The following information was obtained in part from the Department of Ecology website) Naiads (or slender water-nymph and common water-nymph) are completely submerged annual plants, although they are often found as floating fragments, They have opposite leaves that are often clustered near the tips of the stems. The leaf base is much wider than the rest of the leaf blade, which helps to distinguish the naiads from other underwater plants. These plants have inconspicuous flowers and fruits that are almost completely hidden by the leaf bases. Naiad pollination takes place underwater. The plants have glossy, green, and finely toothed leaves that are oppositely arranged, but appear to be whorled near ends of the stems. The leaves are long and narrow with broad bases that clasp the stem, and taper to a long point 1-3 cm long and 1-2 mm wide. The stem is slender, limp and branched up to 2 m long and easily broken. The flower is inconspicuous, tiny (2-3 mm), and is located in clusters at the base of the leaves. Male and female flowers occur separately on the same plant. Naiad pollen is transported by water currents. The fruit is a small, oval-shaped fruit is located in the leaf bases, and are present in late summer. The entire plant is eaten by waterfowl. Naiads are considered to be one of their most important food sources. They also provide shelter for small fish and insects. NA T/VE SUBMERGED MACROALGAE (The following information was obtained in part from the Department of Ecology website) Plant-like algae (Chara, spp) Although these common lake inhabitants look similar to many underwater plants, they are actually algae. Chara are green or gray-green colored algae that grow completely submersed in shallow (4 cm) to deep (20 m) water. Individuals can vary greatly in size, 20 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 INAl DRAfT ranging from 5 cm to 1 m in length. The main "stem" of Char a bear whorls of branch lets, clustered at regularly spaced joints, When growing in hard water, Chara sometimes become coated with lime, giving them a rough gritty feel. These algae are identifiable by their strong skunk-like or garlic odor, especially evident when crushed. Algae lack true leaves. Six to 16 leaf-like branchlets of equal length grow in whorls around the stem, and are never divided. These branchlets often bear tiny thorn-like projections, which give the plant a rough or prickly appearance when magnified. They also lack true stems. The round, stem-like structure varies from 5 cm to over 1 m in length. Chara, like other algae, do not produce flowers. Instead, microscopic one-celled sex organs called oogonia are formed. These tiny organs and patterns in the cases that surround them are used to distinguish between species. Tiny spores are produced in fruiting bodies. In some species the fruiting bodies are orange and very conspicuous. In addition, Chara may be attached to the bottom by root-like structures called ho1dfasts. Plant-like algae (Nitella, sp.) Nitellas are bright green algae that often are mistaken for higher plants because they appear to have leaves and stems. These long, slender, delicate, smooth-textured algae lie on the bottom of a lake or pond and are seldom found in the water column. They are found growing in shallow to deep waters of soft water or acid lakes and bogs. They often grow in deeper water than flowering plants and frequently form a thick carpet or grow in clumps along the bottom. Whorls of forked branches are attached at regularly spaced intervals along the "stems". Nitellas sometime grow together with muskgrasses (Chara spp.), another plant-like algae, to form underwater meadows, The plant has no true leaves, Six-eight evenly forked branchlets grow in whorls at regularly spaced intervals along the "stem". Unlike the rough branchlets of most muskgrasses (Chara spp.), nitella branch1ets have a smooth texture. Nitellas have no true stems, but have hollow, stem-like structures that have whorls of forked branches along their entire length. The largest nitella species have "stems" up to 2 mlong. The plant does not bear flowers. Instead nitellas have microscopic spore-producing organs. Male organs grow at the base of the branchlets. Female organs are located in a cluster on the sides of the branchlets below the male organs. Nitellas produce spores (which are transported by wildlife) rather than fruits, and lack roots. The plants may be attached to the bottom by root-like structures called holdfasts or floating free above the sediment. 21 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAl.. DRAFT They provide cover for fish, food for fish and waterfowl, and stabilizes the sediment. Because nitellas have no roots, they remove nutrients directly from the water. Nitellas are considered desirable species in Washington. Non-Native Plant Species NON-NA TIVE EMERGENT PLANTS Yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus) Yellow flag iris is native to mainland Europe, the British Isles, and the Mediterranean region of North Africa (Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board, 200la). This plant was introduced widely as a garden ornamental. It has also been used for erosion control. The earliest collection in Washington is /Tom Lake McMurray in Skagit County in 1948 (Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board, 2001a). The yellow flowers are a distinguishing characteristic, and when not flowering it may be confused with cattail (Typha sp.) or broad-fruited bur-reed (Sparganium eurycarpum). . Yellow flag iris is considered an obligate wetland species (OBL), with a >99% probability of occurring in wetlands as opposed to upland areas (Reed, 1988). The plants produce large fruit capsules and corky seeds in the late summer. Yellow flag iris spreads by rhizomes and seeds. Up to several hundred flowering plants may be connected rhizomatously. Rhizome fragments can form new plants, Yellow flag iris can spread by rhizome growth to form dense stands that can exclude even the toughest of our native wetland species, such as Typha latifolia (cattail). In addition to threatening plant diversity, this noxious weed can also alter hydrologic dynamics through sediment accretion along the shoreline. This species produces prolific seeds that could easily be transported downstream to invade other valuable resource areas. NON-NA TIVE ROOTED FLOA TING-LEA VED PLANTS Fragrant water lily, white water lily (Nymphaea odorata) (The following information was obtained in part from the Department of Ecology website) Fragrant water lily is a Class C Noxious Weed, Fragrant water lilies (Nymphaea odorata) are water plants with floating leaves and large many-petaled fragrant blossoms. The hardy white and (sometimes) pink lilies have become naturalized in Washington lakes and rivers. These plants are native to the eastern United States and it is believed that the water lily was introduced to Washington in the late 1800s. Water lilies have been intentionally planted in many Washington lakes, especially those lakes in western 22 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Washington. Lake residents are strongly discouraged from planting fragrant waterlilies in lakes or natural waterbodies because they are aggressive plants, and sometimes "hitchhiker" plants such as hydrilla can also be introduced to our lakes when water lilies are planted. Of 15 lakes surveyed in 1994 in King County, Nymphaea odorata appeared on the species list of all 15 lakes, Shallow lakes are particularly vulnerable to being totally covered by fragrant waterli1ies, Left unmanaged, waterlilies will restrict lake-front access and eliminate swimming opportunities. Requests for waterli1y control represent a high percentage of the herbicide permit requests received by the Department of Ecology. Water lilies grow in dense patches, excluding native species and even creating stagnant areas with low oxygen levels underneath the floating mats. These mats make it difficult to fish, water ski, swim, or even paddle a canoe through. Although relatively slow-spreading, water lilies will eventually colonize shallow water depths to six feet deep and can dominate the shorelines of shallow lakes. For this reason, planting water lilies in lakes is not recommended. Waterlilies provide excellent cover for largemouth bass, sunfish, and frogs. However, when allowed to grow in dense stands, the floating leaves prevent wind mixing and extensive areas of low oxygen can develop under waterlily beds during the summer. When managed to form a patchy distribution interspersed with open water, waterlilies can provide excellent habitat. Water lilies reproduce by seed and also by new plants sprouting from the large spreading roots (underground stems called rhizomes), A planted rhizome will cover about a 15-foot diameter in about five years. Each spring (April) new shoots appear from the rhizomes and grow up through the water until they reach the surface. The flowers appear from June to September. After the flowers have closed for the final time, the flower stalk "corkscrews" and draws the developing fruit below the water. The plant senesces in the fall and over-winters as the rhizome. Root systems are tenacious, and if pieces of the rhizome are broken off during control efforts, they will drift to other locations and establish a new patch of lilies. Because of their large, showy flowers, water lilies are easy to identify when flowering, They have white or pink showy flowers. When not in flower look for: . Nearly-circular floating leaves, up-to-ll inches in diameter. The underside of the leaf is often red or purple with numerous veins. The stem is attached to the center of the leaf. The leaves each have a deep cleft to the stem. NON-NA T/VE SUBMERGED MACROPHYTES 23 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 FINAL DRAFT (I'hefollowing i'?formation was obtained in partfrom the Department of Ecology website) Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) Eurasian watermilfoi1 (milfoil) is a Class B Noxious Weed. Mi1foil is an attractive plant with feathery underwater foliage. Once commonly sold as an aquarium plant, mi1foil originated from Europe and Asia. It was introduced to North America 50 to 100 years ago. The first known specimen of mil foil in Washington was collected from Lake Meridian near Seattle in 1965. By the mid 1970s it was also found in Lake Washington. Now milfoil is found throughout the Northwest; and in western Washington, has followed the Interstate 5 corridor. Milfoi1 is an extremely adaptable plant, able to tolerate and even thrive in a variety of environmental conditions. It grows in still to flowing waters, grows rooted in water depths from 1 to 10 meters (regularly reaching the surface while growing in water 3 to 5 meters deep), and can survive under ice. Relative to other submersed plants, mi1foi1 requires high light, has a high photosynthetic rate, and can grow over a broad temperature range. Mi1foi1 grows best on fine-textured, inorganic sediments and relatively poorly on highly organic sediments. Because it is widely distributed and difficult to control, milfoil is considered to be the most problematic plant in Washington. The introduction of mil foil can drastically alter a waterbody's ecology. Milfoil forms very dense mats of vegetation on the surface of the water. These mats interfere with recreational activities such as swimming, fishing, water skiing, and boating. The sheer mass of plants can cause flooding and the stagnant mats can create good habitat for mosquitoes. Milfoi1 mats can rob oxygen from the water by preventing the wind from mixing the oxygenated surface waters to deeper water. The dense mats of vegetation can also increase the sedimentation rate by trapping sediments. Milfoil also starts spring growth sooner than native aquatic plants and can shade out these beneficial plants. When milfoil invades new territory, typically the species diversity of aquatic plants declines. While some species of waterfowl will eat milfoil, it is not considered to be a good food source. Milfoil adversely impacts aquatic ecosystems by forming dense canopies that often shade out native vegetation. Mono-specific stands of mil foil provide poor habitat for waterfowl, fish, and other wildlife. Significant rates of plant sloughing and leaf turnover, as well as the decomposition of high biomass at the end of the growing season, increase the internal loading of phosphorus and nitrogen to the water column. Dense milfoil mats alter water quality by raising pH, decreasing oxygen under the mats, and increasing temperature. Milfoil exhibits an annual pattern of growth. In the spring, shoots begin to grow rapidly as water temperatures approach 15 degrees centigrade. When they near the surface, shoots 24 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FI branch profusely, forming a dense canopy. The leaves below I-meter senesce in response to self-shading. Typically, plants flower upon reaching the surface (usually in mid to late July). After flowering, plant biomass declines as the result of the fragmentation of stems. Where flowering occurs early, plant biomass may increase again later in the growing season and a second flowering may occur. During fall, plants die back to the root crowns, which sprout again in the spring. In some areas, like western Washington, milfoil frequently over-winters in an evergreen form and may maintain considerable winter biomass, Milfoil plants do not form specialized over-wintering structures such as turions. Carbohydrate storage occurs throughout over-wintering shoots and roots. Although Milfoi1 can potentially spread by both sexual and vegetative means, vegetative spread is considered the major method of reproduction. During the growing season, the plant undergoes auto-fragmentation. The abscising fragments often develop roots at the nodes before separation from the parent plants. Fragments are also produced by wind and wave action and boating activities, with each fragment having the potential to develop into a new plant. Milfoil can easily be transported from lake to lake on boat trailers or fishing gear. Once introduced, milfoi1 also may spread rapidly and can infest an entire lake within two years of introduction to the system. Some tips to identify milfoil: . Count the pairs of leaflets. Milfoil usually has twelve or more pairs on each leaf. Milfoilleaves tend to collapse around the stem when removed from the water. Other milfoil species have thicker stems and are usually more robust. The mature leaves are typically arranged in whorls of four around the stem. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL ALTERNATIVES The aquatic plant management goals are based on controlling four plant communities: milfoil, fragrant water lily, native submerged plants, and yellow flag iris. The feasibility of different plant control techniques depends on the specific aquatic plant and the degree of control desired. This section outlines common methods used to control aquatic weeds. Much of the information in this section is quoted directly from the Department of Ecology's website. Additional information is derived from the field experience of the King County Noxious 25 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FI l DRAfl' Weed Control Program, in particular from Drew Kerr, Aquatic Noxious Weed Specialist and WSDA licensed aquatic herbicide applicator. Recommendations found in the 2001 draft version of the "King County Regional Mi1foi1 Plan" have also been taken into consideration. Control/eradication methods discussed herein include Aquatic Herbicide, Manual Methods, Bottom Screens, Diver Dredging, Biological Control, Rotovation, Cutting, Harvesting, and DrawdoWll. Aquatic Herbicides Description Aquatic herbicides are chemicals specifically formulated for use in water to eradicate or control aquatic plants. Herbicides approved for aquatic use by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) have been reviewed and considered compatible with the aquatic environment when used according to label directions. However, individual states may also impose additional constraints on their use. Aquatic herbicides are sprayed directly onto floating or emergent aquatic plants, or are applied to the water in either a liquid or pellet form. Systemic herbicides are capable of killing the entire plant by tran10cating from foliage or stems and killing the root. Contact herbicides cause the parts of the plant in contact with the herbicide to die back, leaving the roots alive and capable ofre-growth (chemical mowing). Non-selective herbicides will generally affect all plants that they come in contact with, both monocots and dicots. Selective herbicides will affect only some plants (usually dicots - broad leafed plants like Eurasian watermilfoil will be affected by selective herbicides whereas monocots like Brazilian elodea and our native pondweeds may not be affected). Because of environmental risks from improper application, aquatic herbicide use in Washington State waters is regulated and has certain restrictions. The Washington State Department of Agriculture must license aquatic applicators. In addition, because of a March 2001 court decision (Federal 9th Circuit District Court), coverage under a discharge permit called a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit must be obtained before aquatic herbicides can be applied to some waters of the U.S. This ruling, referred to as the Talent Irrigation District decision, has further defined Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. Ecology has developed a general NPDES permit which is available for coverage under the Washington Department of Agriculture for the management of noxious weeds growing in an aquatic situation and a separate general permit for nuisance aquatic weeds (native plants) and algae control. For nuisance weeds (native species also referred to as beneficial vegetation) and algae, applicators and the local sponsor of the project must obtain a NPDES permit from the Washington Department of Ecology before applying herbicides to Washington water bodies. Although there are a number of EP A registered aquatic herbicides, the Department of Ecology currently issues permits for four aquatic herbicides (as of2002 treatment 26 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAFT season). Several other herbicides are undergoing review and it is likely that other chemicals may be approved for use in Washington in the future. As an example, Garlon 3A is due to be approved by the U.S. EPA for aquatic use before spring 2003. The chemicals that are currently permitted for use in 2002 are: Rodeo@ or AQuamaster@) is a systemic non-selective herbicide is.used to control floating-leaved plants like water lilies and shoreline plants like purple loosestrife and yellow flag iris. It's active ingredient is glyphosate. It is generally applied as a liquid to the leaves. Rodeo@ or Aquamaster<ID does not work on underwater plants such as Eurasian watermilfoil. Although glyphosate is a non-selective herbicide, a good applicator can somewhat selectively remove targeted plants by focusing the spray only on the plants to be removed. Plants take several weeks to die. A repeat application is often necessary to remove plants that were missed during the first application. Note: there are now other glyphosate products available, like Aquamaster@, with the exact formulation as Rodeo@ but with different trade names now that the patent has expired. Additional surfactants are often added to improve the penetration of the leaf cuticle and help the herbicide stay on the plant long enough to be effective. Those that may be used for emergent weed control include X-77, LI-700, and R-l! as approved by the SEPA process. 2,4-D is a systemic, selective herbicide used for the control of Eurasian watermilfoil and other broad-leaved species. Formulations of2,4-D include: . Navigate@ and AquaKleen@ - Active ingredient 2,4-D BEE. These granular products contain the low-volatile butoxyethyl-ester (BEE) formulation of2,4-D. 2,4- D is a relatively fast acting selective, systemic herbicide. It is applied in a granular formulation and can be effective for spot treatment of Eurasian watermilfoil. When used at a rate of 100 pounds per acre, 2,4-D has shown to be selective to Eurasian watermilfoil, leaving native aquatic species relatively unaffected. DMA*4IVM@- Dimethy1amine Salt of2,4-D. This is a liquid formulation that is labeled for aquatic weed control. Since 2,4-D DMA (like 2,4-D BEE) is rapidly converted to 2,4-D acid, the two products should be equally effective in controlling Eurasian watermilfoil. Previously, 2,4-D DMA was only registered for this use in dams and reservoirs of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TV A) System, but is now approved for use in Washington. It has recently been used to successfully control Eurasian watermi1foil in parts of Lake Washington, King County (Dorling, pers. comm,). Sonar@) - Active ingredient fluridone. Sonar@) is a slow-acting systemic herbicide used to control Eurasian watermilfoil and other underwater plants. It may be applied in pelleted form or as a liquid. Fluridone can show good control of submersed plants where there is little water movement and an extended time for the treatment. Its use is most applicable to whole-lake or isolated bay treatments where dilution can be minimized. It is not effective for spot treatments. It may take six to twelve weeks before the dying plants fall to the sediment and decompose. When used to manage Eurasian watermilfoil, Sonar@) is applied several times during the summer to maintain a low, but consistent concentration in the water. Although fluridone is considered to 27 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAFT be a non-selective herbicide, when used at low concentrations, it can be used to selectively remove Eurasian watermilfoil. Some native aquatic plants, especially pondweeds, are minimally affected by low concentrations offluridone. . Aquathol@ - Active ingredient the dipotassium salt of endothall. Aquathol@ is a fast-acting non-selective contact herbicide, which destroys the vegetative part of the plant but does not kill the roots. Aquatho1@ may be applied in a granular or liquid form. Generally endothall compounds are used primarily for short-term (one season) control of a variety of aquatic plants. However, there has been some recent research that indicates that when used in low concentrations, Aquathol@ can be used to selectively remove exotic weeds, leaving native species unaffected. Because it is fast acting, Aquatho1@ can be used to treat smaller areas effectively. There are water use restrictions associated with the use of Aquatho1@ in Washington. Advantages . Aquatic herbicide application can be less expensive than other aquatic plant control methods. Aquatic herbicides are easily applied around docks and underwater obstructions. 2,4-D DMA & 2,4-D BEE have been shown to be effective in controlling smaller infestations (not lake-wide) of Eurasian watermilfoi1 in Washington, Washington has had some success in eradicating Eurasian watermilfoil from some smaller lakes (320 acres or less) using Sonar@. Disadvantages Some herbicides have swimming, drinking, fishing, irrigation, and water use restrictions. Herbicide use may have unwanted impacts to people who use the water and to the environment. Non-targeted plants as well as nuisance plants may be controlled or killed by some herbicides. Depending on the herbicide used, it may take several days to weeks or several treatments during a growing season before the herbicide controls or kills treated plants. Rapid-acting herbicides like Aquathol@ may cause low oxygen conditions to develop as plants decompose. Low oxygen can cause fish kills. 28 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 DRAFT To be most effective, generally herbicides must be applied to rapidly-growing plants. . Some expertise in using herbicides is necessary in order to be successful and to avoid unwanted impacts. Many people have strong feelings against using chemicals in water. . Some cities or counties may have policies forbidding or discouraging the use of aquatic herbicides. Permit Requirements A NPDES permit is needed for the use of aquatic herbicides. Both the noxious and nuisance NPDES permits require the development of integrated aquatic vegetation management plan by the third year of control work. Monitoring may also be required. For noxious weed control, apply to the Washington Department of Agrículture for coverage under their NPDES permit each treatment season. There is no permit or application fee to obtain coverage under Agriculture's permit. Costs Approximate costs for one-acre herbicide treatment (costs will vary from site to site): DMA*4IVM@: $500-700 . Navigate@ and AquaKleen@: $500-700 Rodeo@ or Aquamaster@ : $250 Sonar@: $900 to $1,000 Human Health and Fish and Wildlife Considerations As far as restrictions for aquatic 2,4-D applications, there is a I-day swimming restriction, no fishing restriction, and three to five days after treatment the water is generally below the drinking water standard (70 ppb, irrigation standard is 100 ppb for broad-leafed plants). There is no irrigation restriction for watering lawns. This chemical has a low acute toxicity (from an LD50 standpoint, is less toxic than caffeine and slightly more toxic than aspirin). Based on the low dermal absorption of the chemical, the dose of the chemical received from skin contact with treated water is not considered significant (Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 200lb). Recent, state-of-the-art EPA studies. continue to find that it is not considered a carcinogen or mutagen, nor does it cause birth defects. It has a relatively short persistence in aquatic systems, since it tends to bind to 29 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAFT organic matter in the sediments. The herbicide 2,4-D generally does not bioaccumu1ate to a great extent, and the small amounts which do accumulate are rapidly eliminated once exposure ceases (Washington State Department of Ecology, 2001b). Based on laboratory data reported in the Department of Ecology's Risk Assessment of 2,4-D, 2,4-D DMA has a low acute toxicity to fish (LC50 = > 1 00 to 524 mg a.i./L for the rainbow trout and bluegill sunfish respectively). No Federally sensitive/threatened or endangered species were tested with 2,4-D DMA. However, it is likely that endangered salmonids would not exhibit higher toxic effects to 2,4-D DMA than those seen in rainbow trout. Since the maximum use rate of 2,4-D DMA would be no higher than the maximum labeled use rate (4.8 mg a.i./L) even the most sensitive fish species within the biota should not suffer acute impacts from the effects of2,4-D DMA. In conclusion, 2,4- D DMA will not effect fish or free-swimming invertebrate biota acutely or chronically when applied at typical use rates of 1.36 to 4.8 mg a.i./L (Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 2001 b). However, more sensitive species of benthic invertebrates like glass shrimp may be affected by 2,4-D DMA, but 80 and 90% of the benthic species should be safe when exposed to 2,4-D DMA acutely or chronically at rates recommended on the label. Field work indicates that 2,4-D has no significant adverse impacts on fish, free- swimming invertebrates and benthic invertebrates, but well designed field studies are in short supply. According to the Department of Ecology's Risk Assessment of2,4-D, in the United States, 2,4-D BEE is the most common herbicide used to control aquatic weeds. 2,4-D BEE, has a high laboratory acute toxicity to fish (LC50 =.0.3 to 5.6 mg a.i./L for rainbow trout fry and fathead minnow fingerlings, respectively). Formal risk assessment indicates that short-term exposure to 2,4-D BEE should cause adverse impact to fish since the risk quotient is above the acute level of concern of 0.01 (RQ = 0.1 ppm/O.3 ppm = 0.33). However, the low solubility of 2,4-D BEE and its rapid hydrolysis to 2,4-D acid means fish are more likely to be exposed to the much less toxic 2,4-D acid. 2,4-D acid has a toxicity similar to 2,4-D DMA to fish (LC50 = 20 mg to 358 mg a.i./L for the common carp and rainbow trout, respectively). In contrast, formal risk assessment with 2,4-D acid indicates that short-term exposure to 2,4-D BEE should not cause adverse impact to fish since the risk quotient is below the federal level of concern of 0.01 (RQ = 0.1 ppm/20 ppm = 0.005), To conclude, 2,4-D BEE will have no significant impact on the animal biota acutely or chronically when using applied rates recommended on the label (Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 2001b). Although laboratory data indicates that 2,4- D BEE may be toxic to fish, free-swimming invertebrates and benthic invertebrates, data indicates that its toxic potential is not realized under typical concentrations and conditions found in the field. This lack of field toxicity is likely due to the low solubility of2,4-D BEE and its rapid hydrolysis to the practically non-toxic 2,4-D acid within a few hours to a day following the application. Glyphosate is practically nontoxic by ingestion, with a reported acute oral LD50 of 5600 mg/kg in the rat. Technically, glyphosate acid is practically nontoxic to fish and may be slightly toxic to aquatic invertebrates (EXTOXNET, 1996). Some formulations may be 30 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 NAL DRAFT more toxic to fish and aquatic species due to differences in toxicity between the salts and the parent acid,or to surfactants used in the formulation. There is a very low potential for the compound to build up in the tissues of aquatic invertebrates or other aquatic organisms, Glyphosate is moderately persistent in soil, with an estimated average half-life of 47 days. It is strongly adsorbed to most soils, even those with lower organic and clay content. Thus, even though it is highly soluble in water, field and laboratory studies show it does not leach appreciably, and has low potential for runoff (except as adsorbed to colloidal matter). One estimate indicated that less than 2% of the applied chemical is lost to runoff. Microbes are primarily responsible for the breakdown of the product, and volatilization or photodegradation losses will be negligible. In water, glyphosate is strongly adsorbed to suspended organic and mineral matter and is broken down primarily by microorganisms. Suitability for Steel Lake Aquatic herbicides can provide an effective method for control and eventual eradication of noxious weeds, The use ofa formulation of2,4-D should provide excellent initial control of Eurasian watermilfoil while allowing for the more-appropriate spot treatments for future scattered infestation. Annual surveys, public education, effective and spot treatments as necessary will be sufficient to control and eradicate milfoil. Therefore, the potential for future lake-wide fluridone treatments with fluridone (Sonar@) will be reduced substantially. The granular formulations of2,4-D BEE found in Navigate@ and AquaKleen@ has been shown to be highly effective for spot treatment of mil foil in Steel Lake. The time-released nature of these granular formulations is less susceptible to drift, Liquid formulations can drift off target as a result of wind and/or boat activity. Therefore, liquid formulations have a slightly higher risk of injuring off-target organisms. In addition, granular applications are visible - the applicator can direct the product directly onto the target plants. The granules adhere to the leaves, increasing the effectiveness (Vandermeulen, personal communication). However, impacts to resident fish populations in the short term would be greatest with the use of2,4-D BEE as it has a high acute toxicity before its hydrolysis to 2,4-D acid. Steel Lake does not appear to have anadromous salmonids. According to King County's Hy1ebos and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan, salmon habitat potentially exists on the lower reach of Redondo Creek into Federal Way. However, the stream is likely blocked to salmon migration due to a culvert at the mouth of the stream where the lower most 500 feet of the channel is piped, and likely presenting an impassable barrier to migrating fish. (Hy1ebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basins Current and Future Conditions Report). Therefore, the choice of treatment methodologies is not limited by the presence of anadromous salmonids, Glyphosate should be very effective on the other target species: fragrant water lily, and yellow flag iris. Westerdah1 and Getsinger (1988) report excellent control of the fragrant 31 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 water lily with glyphosate. Generally glyphosate is the recommended herbicide for water lily control because it can be applied directly to the floating leaves, unlike fluridone or endothall which must be applied to the water. The application of glyphosate allows specific plants or areas of plants to be targeted for removal. Generally two applications of glyphosate are needed. The second application later in the summer controls the plants that were missed during the first herbicide application. The control effectiveness of fragrant water lily is easy to measure through visual surveys due to the floating leaves. Glyphosate should also provide excellent systemic control of yellow flag iris. This species has an abundant leaf surface area to absorb the chemical for translocation to the rhizome. The use of an herbicide will enable the elimination of the mature plants without potentially destructive disturbance of the shoreline by excavation. One of the main reasons to eradicate milfoil and fragrant water lily is to maintain the health of the native aquatic plant community for all of the species that utilize them in their life cycles, as well as for the human recreational uses. The nature of the control methods to be implemented will minimize impacts to native aquatic vegetation. The control of the Eurasian watermilfoil and fragrant water lily will be conducted by methods designed to preserve (and eventually enhance or conserve) the native plant communities. Herbicide selective to Eurasian watermilfoil will be used for its control and should not require a whole-lake treatment that would expose all the submersed plants to the herbicide, The herbicide for the fragrant water lily will be applied to the leaves, and therefore should be easily focused to kill only the target vegetation. The application of herbicide to the emergent species (yellow flag iris) will also be conducted by manual spot applications. An experienced herbicide applicator can selectively target individual weed species and limit collateral damage to other species to a minimum. This is especially true when infestations are small so that large areas with a diverse plant distribution don't have to be treated. Since the emergent noxious weed infestations at Steel Lake are still confined largely to the shoreline, it should be relatively simple for the control applicator to avoid collateral damage and preserve the native plant community. The need to revegetate after controlling the milfoil and fragrant water lily is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that removal of the invasive vegetation will promote growth of native plants. The goal is to have at least 40% native aquatic vegetative cover. The annual survey will help determine whether there is sufficient native vegetation to support aquatic wildlife. In the terrestrial environment, bare ground will often be colonized rapidly by invasive species, but this is not usually a problem in lacustrine areas. A drawback of using herbicides is the "uplifting" of mats of decomposing water lily roots that can form large floating islands in the waterbody after the herbicides have killed the plants. These floating mats may become problematic, especially at the west end of the lake where a larger area is covered with fragrant water lily. Often these large islands float to the east end of the lake landing on the shoreline. 32 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3. 2003 Manual Methods Hand-Pulling Hand-pulling aquatic plants is similar to pulling weeds out of a garden. It involves removing entire plants (leaves, stems, and roots) from the area of concern and disposing of them in an area away from the shoreline, In water less than three feet deep no specialized equipment is required, although a spade, trowel, or long knife may be needed if the sediment is packed or heavy. In deeper water, hand-pulling is best accomplished by divers with SCUBA equipment and mesh bags for the collection of plant fragments. Some sites may not be suitable for hand pulling such as areas where deep flocculent sediments may cause a person hand pulling to sink deeply into the sediment. Cutting Cutting differs from hand pulling in that plants are cut and the roots are not removed. Cutting is performed by standing on a dock or on shore and throwing a cutting tool out into the water. A non-mechanical aquatic weed cutter is commercially available, Two single-sided, razor sharp stainless steel blades forming a "V" shape are connected to a handle, which is tied to a long rope. The cutter can be thrown about 20 - 30 feet into the water. As the cutter is pulled through the water, it cuts a 48-inch wide swath, Cut plants rise to the surface where they can be removed. Washington State requires that cut plants be removed from the water. The stainless steel blades that form the V are extremely sharp and great care must be taken with this implement. It should be stored in a secure area where children do not have access. Raking A sturdy rake makes a useful tool for removing aquatic plants. Attaching a rope to the rake allows removal of a greater area of weeds. Raking literally tears plants from the sediment, breaking some plants off and removing some roots as well. Specially designed aquatic plant rakes are available. Rakes can be equipped with floats to allow easier plant and fragment collection. The operator should pull towards the shore because a substantial amount of plant material can be collected in a short distance. Cleanup All of the manual control methods create plant fragments, It's important to remove all fragments from the water to prevent them from re-rooting or drifting onshore. Plants and fragments can be composted or added directly to a garden, Advantages 33 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Manual methods are easy to use around docks and swimming areas, The equipment is inexpensive. Hand-pulling allows the flexibility to remove undesirable aquatic plants while leaving desirable plants. . These methods are environmentally safe and will not harm aquatic wildlife. Manual methods don't require expensive permits, and can be performed on aquatic noxious weeds with Hydraulic Project Approval obtained by reading and following the pamphlet Aquatic Planls and Fish (publication #APF -1-98) available from the Washington Department ofFish & Wildlife. Disadvantages . As plants re-grow or fragments re-colonize the cleared area, the treatment may need to be repeated several times each summer. Because these methods are labor intensive, they may not be practical for large areas or for thick weed beds. Even with the best containment efforts, it is difficult to collect all plant fragments, leading to re-colonization. Some plants, like water lilies which have massive rhizomes, are difficult to remove by hand pulling. Pulling weeds and raking stirs up the sediment and making it difficult to see remaining plants. Sediment re-suspension can also increase nutrient levels in lake water. Hand pulling and raking impacts bottom-dwelling animals. . The V -shaped cutting tool is extremely sharp and can be dangerous to use. Permit Requirements Permits are required for many types of manual projects in lakes and streams. The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife requires a Hydraulic Project Approval permit for all activities taking place in the water including hand pulling, raking, and cutting of aquatic plants. In addition, some projects may require a Shoreline Development permit from the City of Federal Way. Costs . Hand-pulling costs up to $130 for the average waterfront lot for a hired commercial puller. 34 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 A commercial grade weed cutter costs about $130 with accessories. A commercial rake costs about $95 to $125. A homemade weed rake costs about $85 (asphalt rake is about $75 and the rope costs 35- 75 cents per foot). Other Considerations Manual methods must include regular scheduled surveys to determine the extent of the remaining weeds and/or the appearance of new plants after eradication has been attained. Manual methods have the potential for missing milfoil plants, especially after stirring up sediments, Manual methods have the potential for fragmentation, exacerbating the existing mil foil problem Suitability for Steel lake Annual diver hand-pulling should be sufficient to remove a portion of re-emerging milfoil plants, In combination with herbicide treatments (when needed), manual methods used to contain and control, can effectively combat milfoil re-infestations in subsequent years, Cutting can be used to control small areas of fragrant water lily, especially those close to the shoreline, Using this method out in the open water would require a stable boat (not canoe) and great care not to injure oneself or another passenger. Since repeated cutting over several seasons may be required to starve the roots, this would fit best as a supplement to other control methods. Manual efforts are much more difficult on yellow flag iris since the plants don't emerge from simple stems that can be cut, and they arise from massive rhizomes inhibiting pulling or digging, The growth area may also be dangerous for volunteers or homeowners due to the deep muck along the lakeshore. Because there is a large amount of root mass associated with the iris, a significant effort is necessary to remove by excavation, an activity that may potentially disturb other plant communities. This would also expose the face of the peat layer, which could contribute to desiccation and disintegration of the other beneficial plant colony edges, This could lead to water quality problems. Diver Dredging Diver dredging (suction dredging) is a method whereby SCUBA divers use hoses attached to small dredges (often dredges used by miners for mining gold from streams) to 35 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 suck plant material from the sediment. The purpose of diver dredging is to remove all parts of the plant including the roots. A good operator can accurately remove target plants, like Eurasian watermilfoil, while leaving native species untouched. The suction hose pumps the plant material and the sediments to the surface where they are deposited into a screened basket. The water and sediment are returned back to the water column (if the permit allows this), and the plant material is retained. The turbid water is generally discharged to an area curtained off from the rest of the lake by a silt curtain. The plants are disposed of on shore. Removal rates vary from approximately 0,25 acres per day to one acre per day depending on plant density, sediment type, and diver efficiency. Diver dredging is more effective in areas where softer sediment allows easy removal of the entire plants, although water turbidity is increased with softer sediments. Harder sediment may require the use of a knife or tool to help loosen sediment from around the roots. In very hard sediments, milfoil plants tend to break off leaving the roots behind and defeating the purpose of diver dredging. In a large-scale operation in western Washington, two years of diver dredging reduced the population of milfoil by 80 percent (Silver Lake, Everett). Diver dredging is less effective on plants where seeds, turions, or tubers remain in the sediments to sprout the next growing season. For that reason, Eurasian watermilfoil is generally the target plant for removal during diver dredging operations. Advantages Diver dredging can be a very selective technique for removing pioneer colonies of Eurasian watermilfoil. Divers can remove plants around docks and in other difficult to reach areas, Diver dredging can be used in situations where herbicide use is not an option for aquatic plant management. Disadvantages Diver dredging is very expensive. Dredging stirs up large amounts of sediment. This may lead to the release of nutrients or long-buried toxic materials into the water column. Only the tops of plants growing in rocky or hard sediments may be removed, leaving a viable root crown behind to initiate growth. Acquisition of permits may take more than a year. . Permit Requirements Permits are required for many types of projccts in lakes and streams. Diver dredging requires Hydraulic Approval from the Department ofFish and Wildlife and a Temporary Modification of Water Quality Standards from Ecology. The city and county must be reviewed for any local requirements before proceeding with a diver-dredging project. 36 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 Also diver dredging may require a Section 404 permit from the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers. Costs Depending on the density of the plants, specific equipment used, and disposal requirements, costs can range from a minimum of $1 ,500 to $2,000 per day. Other Considerations Might be good spot control method in subsequent years (coordinated with diver survey) Suitability for Steel lake As with diver hand pulling, diver dredging could be used after the initial herbicide applications to remove plants that were missed or unaffected by the herbicide. However, permit costs may warrant having this work done as diver hand pulling since the roots should be largely removed from the loose sediments without the need for dredging. Diver dredging greatly disturbs sediments and can affect nutrient concentrations and algal production in the lake (see Disadvantages above). If other removal techniques are suitable, diver dredging should not be considered. Bottom Barriers A bottom screen or benthic barrier covers the sediment like a blanket, compressing aquatic plants while reducing or blocking light. Materials such as burlap, plastics, perforated black Mylar, and woven synthetics can all be used as bottom screens. Some people report success using pond liner materials, There is also a commercial bottom screen fabric called Texe1, a heavy, felt-like polyester material, which is specifically designed for aquatic plant control. An ideal bottom screen should be durable, heavier than water; reduce or block light, prevent plants from growing into and under the fabric, be easy to install and maintain, and should readily allow gases produced by rotting weeds to escape without "ballooning" the fabric upwards. Even the most porous materials, such as window screen, will billow due to gas buildup. Therefore, it is very important to anchor the bottom barrier securely to the bottom. Unsecured screens can create navigation hazards and are dangerous to swimmers. Anchors must be effective in keeping the material down and must be regularly checked. Natural materials such as rocks or sandbags are preferred as anchors. The duration of weed control depends on the rate that weeds can grow through or on top of the bottom screen, the rate that new sediment is deposited on the barrier, and the durability and longevity of the material. For example, burlap may rot within two years, 37 STEEl LAKE JAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 plants can grow through window screening material, and can grow on top of felt-like Texel fabric. Regular maintenance is essential and can extend the life of most bottom barriers. Bottom screens will control most aquatic plants, however freely-floating species will not be controlled by bottom screens, Plants like Eurasian watermilfoil will send out lateral surface shoots and may canopy over the area that has been screened giving less than adequate control. In addition to controlling nuisance weeds around docks and in swimming beaches, bottom screening has become an important tool to help eradicate and contain early infestations of noxious weeds such as Eurasian watermi1foil and Brazilian elodea. Pioneering colonies that are too extensive to be hand pulled can sometimes be covered with bottom screening material. For these projects, burlap with rocks or burlap sandbags can be used for anchors. By the time the material decomposes, the mil foil patches will be dead as long as all plants were completely covered, Snohomish County staff reported native aquatic plants colonizing burlap areas that covered pioneering patches of Eurasian watermilfoil. When using this technique for Eurasian watermilfoil èradication projects, divers should recheck the screen within a few weeks to make sure that all milfoil plants remain covered and that no new fragments have taken root nearby. Bottom screens can be installed by the homeowner or by a commercial plant control specialist. Installation is easier in winter or early spring when plants have died back. In summer, cutting or hand pulling the plants first will facilitate bottom screen installation. Research has shown that much more gas is produced under bottom screens that are installed over the top of aquatic plants. The less plant material that is present before installing the screen, the more successful the screen will be in staying in place. Bottom screens may also be attached to frames rather than placed directly onto the sediment. The frames may then be moved for control of a larger area. Advantages Installation of a bottom screen creates an immediate open area of water. Bottom screens are easily installed around docks and in swimming areas. . Properly installed bottom screens can control up to 100 percent of aquatic plants. Screen materials are readily available and can be installed by homeowners or by divers. Disadvantages . Because bottom screens reduce habital by covering the sediment, they are suitable only for localized control. 38 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 For safety and performance reasons, bottom screens must be regularly inspected and maintained. Harvesters, rotovators, fishing gear, propeller backwash, or boat anchors may damage or dislodge bottom screens, Improperly anchored bottom screens may create safety hazards for boaters and swimmers. . Swimmers may be injured by poorly maintained anchors used to pin bottom screens to the sediment. Some bottom screens are difficult to anchor on deep muck sediments. . Bottom screens interfere with fish spawning and bottom-dwelling animals. Without regular maintenance aquatic plants may quickly colonize the bottom screen, Permit Requirements Bottom screening in Washington requires hydraulic approval, obtained free from the Department ofFish and Wildlife. Check with your local jurisdiction to determine whether a shoreline permit is required. Costs Barrier materials cost $0.22 to $1,25 per square foot. The cost of some commercial barriers includes an installation fee. Commercial installation costs vary depending on sediment characteristics and type of bottom screen selected. It costs up to about $750 to have 1,000 square feet of bottom screen installed. Maintenance costs for a waterfront lot are about $120 each year. Other Considerations . None Suitability for Steel lake . Infested areas are too scattered or are too large to use a bottom barrier without becoming cost prohibitive. Barriers could be effective in dense milfoil areas that have shown resistance to 2,4-D herbicide applications, Barricrs could bc used to eradicate localized infestations. 39 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Biological Control General Overview Many problematic aquatic plants in the western United States are non-indigenous species. Plants like Eurasian watermilfoil have been introduced to North America from other continents. Here they grow extremely aggressively, forming monocultures that exclude native aquatic plants and degrade fish and wildlife habitat. Yet, often these same species are not aggressive or invasive in their native range. This may be in part because their populations are kept under control by insects, diseases, or other factors not found in areas new to them. The biological control of aquatic plants focuses on the selection and introduction of other organisms that have an impact on the growth or reproduction of a target plant, usually from their native ranges. Theoretically, by stocking an infested waterbody or wetland with these organisms, the target plant can be controlled and native plants can recover. Classic biological control uses control agents that are host specific..These organisms attack only the species targeted for control. Generally these biocontrol agents are found in the native range of the nuisance aquatic plants and, like the targeted plant, these biocontrol agents are also non-indigenous species. With classic biological control an exotic species is introduced to control another exotic species. However, extensive research must be conducted before release to ensure that biological control agents are host specific and will not harm the environment in other ways. The authors of Biological Control of Weeds - A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds state that after 100 years of using biocontrol agents, there are only eight examples, world-wide, of damage to non-target plants, "none of which has caused serious economic or environmental damage..." Search for a classical biological control agent typically starts in the region of the world that is home to the nuisance aquatic plant. Researchers collect and rear insects and/or pathogens that appear to have an impact on the growth or reproduction of the target species, Those insects/pathogens that appear to be generalists (feeding or impacting other aquatic plant species) are rejected as biological control agents. Insects that impact the target species (or very closely related species) exclusively are considered for release. Once collected, these insects are reared and tested for host specificity and other parameters. Only extensively researched, host-specific organisms are cleared by the United States for release. It generally takes a number of years of study and specific testing before a biological control agent is approved. Even with an approved host-specific bio-control agent, control can be difficult to achieve. Some biological control organisms are very successful in controlling exotic species and others are oflittle value, A number of factors come into play. It is sometimes difficult to establish reproducing populations of a bio-control agent. The ease of collection of the bio-control and placement on the target species can also have a role in the effectiveness. Climate or other factors may prevent its establishment, with some species not proving capable of over-wintering in their new setting. Sometimes the bio-control insects become 40 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 prey for native predator species, and sometimes the impact of the insect on the target plant just isn't enough to control the growth and reproduction of the species, People who work in this field say that the more biological control species that you can put to work on a problem plant, the better success you will have in controlling the targeted species, There arc some good examples where numerous biological ,control agents have had little effect on a targeted species, and other examples where one bio-control agent was responsible for the complete control of a problem species. However, even when biological control works, a classic biological control agent generally does not totally eliminate all target plants. A predator-prey cycle establishes where increasing predator populations will reduce the targeted species. In response to decreased food supply (the target plant is the sole food source for the predator), the predator species will decline, The target plant species rebounds due to the decline of the predator species, The cycle continues with the predator populations building in response to an increased food supply, Although a successful biological control agent rarely eradicates a problem species, it can reduce populations substantially, allowing native species to return,'Used in an integrated approach with other control techniques, biological agents can stress target plants making them more susceptible to other control methods. A number of exotic aquatic species have approved classic biological control agents available for release in the US. These species include Hydrilla, water hyacinth, alligator weed, and purple loosestrife. Another type of biological control uses general agents such as grass carp (see below) to manage problem plants. Unlike classical bio-control agents, these fish are not host specific and will not target specific species. Although grass carp do have food preferences, under some circumstances, they can eliminate all submersed vegetation in a waterbody. Like classic biological control agents, grass carp are exotic species and originate from Asia. In Washington, all grass carp must be certified sterile before they can be imported into the state. There are many waterbodies in Washington (mostly smaller sites) where grass carp are being used to control the growth of aquatic plants. During the past decade a third type of control agent has emerged, In this case, a native insect that feeds and reproduces on northern milfoil (Myriophyllum sibericum) which is native to North America, was found to also utilize the non-native Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicalum), Vermont government scientists first noticed that Eurasian watermilfoil had declined in some lakes and brought this to the attention of researchers. It was discovered that a native watermilfoil weevil (Euhlychiopsis lecontei) feeding on Eurasian watermilfoil caused the stems to collapse Because native milfoil has thicker stems than Eurasian watermilfoil, the mining activity of the larvae does not cause it the same kind of damage. A number of declines of Eurasian watermilfoil have been documented around the United States and researchers believe that weevils may be implicated in many of these declines. 41 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Several researchers around the United States (Vermont, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ohio, & Washington) have been working to determine the suitability of this insect as a bio-control agent. The University of Washington is conducting research into the suitability of the milfoil weevil for the biological control of mil foil in Washington lakes and rivers. Surveys have shown that in Washington the weevil is found more often in eastern Washington lakes and it seems to prefer more alkaline waters. However, it is also present in cooler, wetter western Washington, The most likely candidates for use as biological controls are discussed in the following section. Grass Carp The grass carp (Cteno pharynogodon) , also known as the white amur, is a vegetarian fish native to the Amur River in Asia. Because this fish feeds on aquatic plants, it can be used as a biological tool to control nuisance aquatic plant growth. In some situations, sterile (triploid) grass carp may be permitted for introduction into Washington waters. Permits are most readily obtained if the lake or pond is privately owned, has no inlet or outlet, and is fairly small. The objective of using grass carp to control aquatic plant growth is to end up with a lake that has about 20 to 40 percent plant cover, not a lake devoid of plants. In practice, grass carp often fail to control the plants, or in cases of overstocking, all the submersed plants are eliminated from the waterbody. The Washington Department ofFish and Wildlife determines the appropriate stocking rate for each waterbody when they issue the grass carp-stocking permit. Stocking rates for Washington lakes generally range from 9 to 25 eight- to eleven-inch fish per vegetated acre. This number will depend on the amount and type of plants in the lake as well as spring and summer water temperatures. To prevent stocked grass carp from migrating out of the lake and into streams and rivers, all inlets and outlets to the pond or lake must be screened. For this reason, residents on waterbodies that support a salmon or steelhead run are rarely allowed to stock grass carp into these systems, Once grass carp are stocked in a lake, it may take from two to five years for them to control nuisance plants, Survival rates of the fish will vary depending on factors like presence of otters, birds of prey, or fish disease, A lake will probably need restocking about every ten years. Success with grass carp in Washington has been varied. Sometimes the same stocking rate results in no control, control, or even complete elimination of all underwater plants. Bonar et. AI. Found that only 18 percent of98 Washington lakes stocked with grass carp at a median level of24 fish per vegetated acre had aquatic plants controlled to an intermediate level. In 39 percent of the lakes, all submersed plant species were eradicated. It has become the consensus among researchers and aquatic plant managers around the country that grass carp are an all or nothing control option. They should be stocked only in waterbodies where complete elimination of all submersed plant species can be tolerated. 42 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Grass carp exhibit definite food preferences and some aquatic plant species will be consumed more readily than others. Pauley and Bonar performed experiments to evaluate the importance of20 Pacific Northwest aquatic plant species as food items for grass carp, Grass carp did not remove plants in a preferred species-by-species sequence in multi- species plant communities. Instead they grazed simultaneously on palatable plants of similar preference before gradually switching to less preferred groups of plants. The relative preference of many plants was dependent upon what other plants were associated with them. The relative preference rank for the 20 aquatic plants tested was as follows: Potamogeton crispus (curly leafpondweed) = P. pectinatus (sago pond weed) > P. zosteriformes (flat-stemmed pond weed) > Chara sp.(muskgrasses) = Elodea canadensis (American waterweed) = thin-leaved pondweeds Potamogeton spp. > Egeria densa (Brazilian elodea) (large fish only) > P. praelongus (white-stemmed pondweed) = Vallisneria americana (water celery) > Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian watermilfoil) > Ceratophyllum demersum (coontail) >Utricularia vulgaris (bladderwort) > Polygonum amphibium (water smartweed) > p, natans (floating leaved pondweed) > P. amplifolius (big 1eafpondweed) > Brasenia schreberi (watershield) = Juncus sp.(rush) > Egeria densa (Brazilian elodea) (fingerling fish only) > Nymphaea sp. (fragrant water lily) > Typha sp, (cattail) > Nuphar sp. (spatterdock). Generally in Washington, grass carp do not consume emergent wetland vegetation or water lilies even when the waterbody is heavily stocked or over stocked, A heavy stocking rate of triploid grass carp in Chambers Lake, Thurston County resulted in the loss of most submersed species, whereas the fragrant water lilies, bog bean, and spatterdock remained at pre-stocking levels. A stocking of 83,000 triploid grass carp into Silver Lake Washington resulted in the total eradication of all submersed species, including Eurasian watermilfoil, Brazilian elodea, and swollen bladderwort, However, the extensive wetlands surrounding Silver Lake have generally remained intact. In southern states, grass carp have been shown to consume some emergent vegetation (Washington State Department of Ecology, 2002). Grass carp stocked into Washington lakes must be certified disease free and sterile, Sterile fish, called triploids because they have an extra chromosome, are created when the fish eggs are subjected to a temperature or pressure shock. Fish are verified sterile by collecting and testing a blood sample. Triploid fish have slightly larger blood cells and can be differentiated from diploid (fertile) fish by this characteristic. Grass carp imported into Washington must be tested to ensure that they are sterile. Because Washington does not allow fertile fish within the state, all grass carp are imported into Washington from out of state locations. Most grass carp farms are located in the southern United States where warmer weather allows for fast fish growth rates. Large shipments are transported in special trucks and small shipments arrive via air. Some facts about grass carp: Are only distantly related to the undesirable European carp, and share few of its habits, 43 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Generally live for at least ten years and possibly much longer in Washington State waters. Will grow rapidly and reach at least ten pounds. They have been known to reach 40 pounds in the southern United States, Feed only on plants at the age they are stocked into Washington waters. Will not eat fish eggs, young fish or invertebrates, although baby grass carp are omnivorous. Feed from the top of the plant down so that mud is not stirred up. However, in ponds and lakes where grass carp have eliminated all submersed vegetation the water becomes turbid. Hungry fish will eat organic material out ofthe sediments. Have definite taste preferences. Plants like Eurasian milfoil and coontai1 are not preferred. American waterweed and thin leaved pondweeds are preferred. Water lilies are rarely consumed in Washington waters. Are dormant during the winter. Intensive feeding starts when water temperatures reach 68° F, Prefer flowing water to still waters (original habitat is fluvial). Are difficult to recapture once released. They may not feed in swimming areas, docks, boating areas, or other sites where there is heavy human activity. Advantages Grass carp are inexpensive compared to some other control methods and offer long- term control, but fish may need to be restocked at intervals, Grass carp offer a biological alternative to aquatic plant control. Disadvantages Depending on plant densities and types, it may take several years to achieve planl control using grass carp and in many cases control may not occur. If the waterbody is overstocked, all submersed aquatic plants may be eliminated. Removing excess fish is difficult and expensive. The type of plants grass carp prefer may also be Ihose most important for habitat and for waterfowl food. If not enough fish are stocked, less-favored plants, such as Eurasian mi1foil, may take over the lake. Stocking grass carp may lead to algae blooms. 44 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAfT All inlets and outlets to the lake or pond must be screened to prevent grass carp from escaping into streams, rivers, or other lakes. Permit Requirements Stocking grass carp requires a fish-stocking permit from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Also, if inlets or outlets need to be screened, an Hydraulic Project Approval application must be completed for the screening project. Costs In quantities of 10,000 or more, 8 to 12 inch sterile grass carp can be purchased for about $5.00 each for truck delivery. The cost of small air freighted orders will vary and is estimated at $8 to $10 per fish. The costs for researchers to locate, culture, and test bio-contro1 agents is high. Once approved for use, insects can sell for $1.00 or more per insect. Sometimes it is possible to establish nurseries where weed specialists can collect insects for reestablishment elsewhere. . Other Considerations . Would not achieve immediate results - takes time and is not guaranteed to work. Community may have concerns with introduced species. Potential damage to the native plant community of the lake, which could result in the establishment of aggressive other plant species as pioneers. Concerns from fishermen about grass carp Initial investment very expensive The introduction of grass carp has generally been discouraged by State agencies, especially in systems like Steel Lake. . . . Suitability for Steel Lake Grass carp are not suitable for aquatic plant control in Steel Lake. The infestation of milfoil has not reached a level where a bio-control such as grass carp would be necessary, Their preferred food species include the dominant submersed native aquatic species in Steel Lake, which might be grazed before the milfoil. They could remove all the beneficial plants that support a healthy fish population. Without cover and the invertebrates associated with beneficial native aquatic vegetation, the system would be degraded and some species (invertebrates, fish, etc.) may be extirpated. The lake also has an outlet stream that eventually flows into Puget Sound, making it much more difficult to obtain the permits necessary to stock grass carp. Watermilfoil Weevil 45 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 DRAfT The following information and citations on the watermi1foi1 weevil are taken from the Washington State Department of Ecology's website on Aquatic Plant Management. The milfoi1 weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei, has been associated with declines of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in the United States (e.g. Illinois, Minnesota, Vermont, and Wisconsin). Researchers in Vermont found that the mi1foil weevil can negatively impact Eurasian watermi1foil by suppressing the plants growth and reducing its buoyancy (Creed and Sheldon 1995). In 1989, state biologists reported that Eurasian watermilfoi1 in Brownington Pond, Vermont had declined from approximately 10 hectares (in 1986) to less than 0,5 hectares. Researchers from Middlebury College, Vermont hypothesized that the mil foil weevil, which was present in Brownington Pond, played a role in reducing Eurasian watermilfoil (Creed and Sheldon 1995). During 1990 through 1992, researchers monitored the populations of Eurasian watermilfoi1 and the milfoi1 weevil in Brownington Pond. They found that by 1991 Eurasian watermilfoil cover had increased to approximately 2.5 hectares (approximately 55-65 glm2) and then decreased to about 1 hectare «15 g/m2) in 1992. Weevil abundance began increasing in 1990 and peaked in June of 1992, where 3 - 4 weevils (adults and !arvae) per stem were detected (Creed and Sheldon 1995). These results supported the hypothesis that the mil foil weevil played a role in reducing Eurasian watermilfoi1 in Brownington Pond, Another documented example where a crash of Eurasian watermilfoil has been attributed to the mil foil weevil is in Cenaiko Lake, Minnesota. Researchers from the University of Minnesota reported a decline in the density of Eurasian watermilfoil from 123 g/m2 in July of 1996 to 14 glm2 in September of 1996. Eurasian watermilfoil remained below 5 g/m2 in 1997, then increased to 44 g/m2 in June and July of 1998 and declined again to 12 g/m2 in September of 1998 (Newman and Biesboer, in press). In contrast, researchers found that weevil abundance in Cenaiko Lake was 1.6 weevils (adults and larvae) per stem in July of 1996. Weevil abundance, however, decreased with declining densities of Eurasian watermilfoil in 1996 and by September 1997 weevils were undetectable. In September of 1998 weevil abundance had increased to >2 weevils per stem (Newman and Biesboer, in press). Based on observations made by researchers in Vermont, Ohio and Wisconsin it seems that having 2 weevils (or more) per stem is adequate to control Eurasian watermilfoil. However, as indicated by the study conducted in Cenaiko Lake, Minnesota, an abundance of 1.5 weevils per stem may be sufficient in some cases (Newman and Biesboer, in press). In Washington State, the milfoil weevil is present primarily in eastern Washington and occurs on both Eurasian and northern watermilfoil (M sibiricum), the latter plant being native to the state (Tamayo et. AI. 1999). During the summer of 1999, researchers from the University of Washington determined the abundance of the mi1foi1 weevil in 11 lakes in Washington. They found, that weevil abundance ranged from undetectable levels to 0.3 weevils (adults and larvae) per stem, Fan Lake, Pend Oreille County had the greatest density per stem of 0.6 weevils (adults, larvae and eggs per stem), The weevils were present on northern watermilfoil. These abundance results are well below the recommendations made by other researchers in Minnesota, Ohio, Vermont, and Wisconsin of having at least 1.5 - 2.0 weevils per stem in order to control Eurasian watermilfoil. 46 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 To date, there have not been any documented declines of Eurasian watermilfoil in Washington State that can be attributed to the milfoil weevil, although Creed speculated that declines of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake Osoyoos and the Okanogan River may have been caused by the milfoil weevil. In Minnesota, Cenaiko Lake is the only lake in that state that has had a Eurasian watermilfoil crash due to the weevil; other weevil lakes are yet to show declines in Eurasian watermilfoil. Researchers in Minnesota have suggested that sunfish predation may be limiting weevil densities in some lakes (Sutter and Newman 1997). The latter may be true for Washington State, as sunfish populations are present in many lakes in the state, including those with weevils. In addition, other environmental factors that may be keeping weevil populations in check in Washington, but have yet to be studied, include over-wintering survival and habitat quality and quantity (Jester et. AI. 1997; Tamayo et. AI., in press), Although the milfoil weevil shows potential as a biological control for Eurasian watermilfoil more work is needed to determine which factors limit weevil densities and what lakes are suitable candidates for weevil treatments in order to implement a cost and control effective program. Advantages . Milfoil weevils offer a biological alternative to aquatic plant control. They may be cheaper than other control strategies. Biocontrols enable weed control in hard-to-access areas and can become se1f- supporting in some systems, Ifthey are capable of reaching a critical mass, biocontro1s can decimate a weed population. . Disadvantages There are many uncertainties as to the effectiveness of this biocontro1 in western Washington waters, There have not been any documented declines of Eurasian watermilfoil in Washington State that can be attributed to the milfoil weevil. Bio-contro1s often don't eradicate the target plant species, and there would be population fluctuations as the milfoil and weevil follow predator-prey cycles. Permit Requirements The milfoil weevil is native to Washington and is present in a number of lakes and rivers. It is found associated with both native northern milfoil and Eurasian watermi1foil. A company is selling milfoil weevils commercially, However, to import these out-of-state weevils into Washington requires a permit from the Washington Department of Agriculture, As of October 1,2002 no permits have been issued for Washington. 47 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Suitability for Steel lake Since the milfoil weevil is a new bio-control agent, it has not been released yet intentionally in western Washington to control Eurasian watermilfoil. It is uncertain how effective the weevil will be and whether populations per stem can be maintained at levels high enough to eradicate Eurasian watermilfoil. Also, as with the grass carp, the infestation of milfoil in Steel Lake is not heavy enough to warrant bio-control introduction when other methods are still available. Rotovation Rotovators use underwater rototiller-like blades to uproot Eurasian watermilfoi1 plants. The rotating blades churn seven to nine inches deep into the lake or river bottom to dislodge plant root crowns that are generally buoyant. The plants and roots may then be removed from the water using a weed rake attachment to the rototiller head or by harvester or manual collection. Harvesting Mechanical harvesters are large machines which both cut and collect aquatic plants, Cut plants are removed from the water by a conveyor belt system and stored on the harvester until disposal. A barge may be stationed near the harvesting site for temporary plant storage or the harvester carries the cut weeds to shore. The shore station equipment is usually a shore conveyor that mates to the harvester and lifts the cut plants into a dump truck. Harvested weeds are disposed of in landfills, used as compost, or in reclaiming spent gravel pits or similar sites. Mechanical Cutting Mechanical weed cutters cut aquatic plants several feet below the water's surface. Unlike harvesting, cut plants are not collected while the machinery operates. Suitability for Steel lake None of these options are suitable for the level of infestation at Steel Lake. They are not eradication tools, but rather are used to manage and control heavy, widespread infestations of aquatic weeds. These processes create plant fragments, and therefore should not be used in systems where milfoil is not already widespread. In infestation levels recently experienced by Steel Lake, these methods would probably serve to spread and expand the infestation. According to Ecology, "There is little or no reduction in plant density with mechanical harvesting." Since the aim of this project is to eliminate milfoil from the system, these are not compatible control strategies. Harvesting and cutting do not remove root systems. Rotovation would cause damage to the lake 48 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 1"1 sediments and associated animals in a system that does not already receive dredging for navigability. Drawdown Lowering the water level of a lake or reservoir can have a dramatic impact on some aquatic weed problems. Water level drawdown can be used where there is a water control structure that allows the managers of lakes or reservoirs to drop the water level in the waterbody for extended periods of time. Water level drawdown often occurs regularly in reservoirs for power generation, flood control, or irrigation; a side benefit being the control of some aquatic plant species. However, regular drawdowns can also make it difficult to establish native aquatic plants for fish, wildlife, and waterfowl habitat in some reservoirs. Suitability for Steel Lake Drawdown is not a viable control strategy for Steel Lake. The outlet from Steel Lake flows through a wetland to a natural stream system, and does not have a control structure installed, Not only would drawdown be difficult to achieve, it would also cause significant damage to the ecosystem. The amount of drawdown required to impact milfoil would dry out the littoral zone of the lake. This would damage native plants and animals in both the lake and the adjacent wetland and have many negative consequences for residents living around the lake. Without a surface inflow to the system, returning the water level to a previous state would be both cost and time prohibitive. INTEGRATED TREATMENT PLAN The following outlines control measures to be implemented to contain listed noxious weed species, and other identified weed species, in Steel Lake and along the shoreline, These control measures will prevent and/or halt the spread of their invasions and reverse potential lake degradation. In addition, the eradication of noxious weed species will provide the opportunity for the reintroduction of native aquatic plants. The target species are Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), fragrant water lily (Nymphaea odorata), and yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus). In addition, native aquatic weeds (i.e. thin-leafed pond weed and submerged macro algae) will be controlled to levels that do not impact public safety or the beneficial uses of the lake; and will be preserved for fish and wildlife habitat. 49 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) The aquatic formulation of2,4-D (Aquakleen@) was used in Steel Lake the summer of 2002 to control an early infestation of milfoil. Approximately 5 acres were treated around the lake with this herbicide, A follow-up visual survey in late summer of2002 indicated that the Aquakleen@ formulation was extremely effective, and shown to be highly effective for spot treatment of milfoil in Steel Lake. The time-released nature of this granular formulation is less susceptible to drift. Liquid formulations can drift off target as a result of wind and/or boat activity. Therefore, liquid formulations have a slightly higher risk of injuring off-target organisms, In addition, granular applications are visible - the applicator can direct the product directly onto the target plants. The granules adhere to the leaves, increasing the effectiveness (Vandermeulen, personal communication). The preferred formulation for the eradication of pioneering colonies of Eurasian watermi1foil is 2,4-D (Aquakleen@ or Navigate@). As described earlier, milfoil can easily be transported from lake to lake on boat trailers or fishing gear, and once introduced it can spread rapidly, infesting an entire lake within two years of introduction to the system, It is widely distributed in Washington and difficult to control. Because of Steel Lake's historical infestations of mil foil, and the danger the introduction of this aquatic weed poses to the lake's ecology, an aggressive but environmentally sound integrated treatment plan has been developed. In Year One (2003), a systematic diver survey will be conducted at the beginning of the growing season (April-May) to identify milfoi1 colony locations, Selective diver hand- pulling will take place then. Manual methods don't require expensive permits, and can be performed on aquatic noxious weeds with Hydraulic Project Approval obtained by reading and following the pamphlet Aquatic Plants and Fish (publication #APF-I-98) available from the Washington Department ofFish & Wildlife. Spot herbicide treatment with 2,4-D (Aquakleen@ or Navigate@) will begin in late May to early June 2003. Approximately 3-acres of mil foil will be estimated to have survived the 2002 treatment, and require selective spot herbicide treatments, A second diver survey will be performed later in the 2003 growing season to detect stray or surviving mil foil plants; and to assess the effectiveness of the earlier manual and/or herbicide control methods used, During this time, diver hand-pulling will be performed again, if required, to remove mil foil remaining after the herbicide application has had time to take effect. Each successive year will begin with diver surveys of the lake performed at the beginning of the growing season. Following these initial diver surveys, the level of mil foil infestation, if any, will be established. Using the survey information, the Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee will decide upon the preferred control strategy to contain milfoil populations at as Iowa density as is environmentally and economically feasible. The need for a second annual diver survey will also be determined by the Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee. 50 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 DRAFT If significant milfoil re-infestations occur over time (greater than 3 acres), it is possible that the aquatic weed has built-up herbicide resistance. In this case, Triclopyr (Garlon 3A) may be used if fully approved for aquatic use by U.S. EPA and by the State of Washington (late 2004). Milfoil is not known to reproduce from seed in this region, so there is no seed bank to exhaust. Because the aquatic weed is introduced by boat traffic, the severity of re- infestations cannot be fully predicted or controlled. Potential reintroduction will remain a challenge. Due to this, an annual herbicide spot treatment application will be planned. Since Steel Lake does not currently have prolific plant growth, milfoil should be located easily during the diver survey, Manual control methods should therefore prove to be very effective. The goal of the treatment plan will be to limit annual herbicide treatment, if possible, and control the majority of milfoil re-infestations by diver hand-pulling. But because of the continual threat of re-infestations, annual herbicide treatment of at least 3- acres of mi1foil will be conservatively budgeted for each year. Additionally, there should be no need to re-vegetate the areas of mil foil after treatment. Most of the native submersed species are monocots (Potamogeton sp.) that should be relatively unaffected by either the 2,4-D (or Triclopyr) application. Removing the noxious invaders will halt the degradation of the system and allow beneficial native vegetation to thrive, Community public education efforts will also continue, including lake resident training in milfoil identification and survey methods. In addition, improved signage will be located in a position approaching the public boat launch to warn boaters before their watercraft enter the water. The NPDES permit coverage requires notification and posting of the waterbody, and these specific protocols will be followed. The NPDES permit also requires monitoring of the herbicide levels in the lake after treatment. Independent samples will be collected at the time of the application and again five days post treatment. One sample is taken from within the treatment area, and one from outside. These four samples (per application) will be sent to an independent laboratory for the analysis, Surveys after the initial application are essential to determining the success of the effort, and will be used to determine what measures need to be implemented to complete the milfoil control. Problems may arise if the same firm that conducted the herbicide application also surveys for the success of the effort. To counter this potential conflict, City of Federal Way and or lake volunteers will conduct these post-treatment surveys. Volunteers from the Steel Lake community will be directly involved with overseeing the implementation of control work to keep the contractors accountable, Fragrant water lily (Nymphaea odorata) 51 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 Control and containment efforts for fragrant water lily will be conducted on an annual, as- needed basis, In 2002, approximately 8 acres of fragrant water lily were reported to be colonizing the lake, with the majority at the west end of the lake, (Vandermuelen, 2003, personal communication). In 2002, approximately three (3) acres of fragrant water lily were treated with Glyphosate, (primarily at the west end), Glyphosate was selected because of it's effectiveness, low cost, and low environmental impact. This aquatic herbicide is a systemic herbicide absorbed by foliage and passed throughout the plant. Since it kills the tubers, it results in long-term control of the plant community. It also exhibits low toxicity to bottom-dwelling organisms, fish, birds and other mammals, and dissipates quickly, Therefore it is considered to have a low environmental impact. In Year One (2003), a systematic diver survey will be conducted at the beginning of the growing season (April-May) to identify and locate fragrant water lily colonies. The Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee will review the findings of the diver survey, and identify the necessary fragrant water lily control and containment methods (aquatic herbicide and/or manual methods) to be implemented, Herbicide treatment (Glysophate) if required, will begin in late May to early June. The herbicide will be applied when floating leaves have formed on the water lily (late spring, early summer). The applications may be followed by cutting and removing operations if target plant areas are not killed by the herbicide, Each year, the Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee will review the findings of the annual diver survey, and identify the most effective and ecologically safe control and containment methods required This integrated approach should be sufficient to ensure the control and containment of fragrant water lily to levels that do not impact public safety or the beneficial uses of the lake. In addition, a year-by-year, systematic eradication of this noxious species will allow for the eventual re-introduction of desirable native aquatic plants, This integrated approach, combined with the Fish Habitat Mitigation Plan described in this IA VMP, will improve fish and wildlife habitat, and the overall ecological health of Steel Lake. A commercially available non-mechanical aquatic weed cutter will be purchased with Lake Management District funds for targeted manual water lily removal when the total acreage is less than one acre, It would also be available to all property owners who wish to control populations near their docks and waterfronts, The primary advantage of hand- cutting is the low cost. The primary drawback is the high amount of labor required to provide adequate control. There are no depth limitations for hand-cutting, therefore the control zone may include any portion of the lake containing water lily beds. However, since it requires manual labor, it is best suited for small patches oflilies that may be hindering lake access. Hand-cutting should be performed by the end of the summer before the plants set seed. Because the plant roots (tubers) are not removed using these tools, the duration of the control is comparatively low. The frequency of the application will be dependant upon 52 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 fiNAL DRAfT water depth. Monthly cuts will maintain deep areas, but more frequent cuts may be necessary for areas less than 3 feet deep. Although cut fragments ofwaterlily will not re- root and grow as some submerged plants do, these fragments should be removed to prevent aesthetic impacts from floating debris and onshore decay of plant materials. Cut fragments float and are best removed with a modified fish seine that encircles small working areas, or is positioned down-wind of the working area. The net should have at least a I-inch mesh so that it will not trap small fish. Another concern associated with the lily beds is the tendency for large "islands" to separate from the main beds and move out into the lake. These floating islands are a safety hazard; they can be unseen obstacles to boaters and attract children who can sometimes stand on the islands, but who could easily be hurt or drown if they broke through the mat of vegetation. Lake residents have tried various methods of removing these islands, but they are too large and awkward to handle. A technique that was successful at Lake Kathleen (King County) used a water pump and hose to wash sediment off the vegetation. Sections of washed vegetation were then removed by hand and placed on the boat for later disposal or compo sting. This'technique is recommended for removing lily islands from Steel Lake. The Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee will identify problematic water lily islands, and recruit volunteers from the community to remove these larger sediment mats on an as-needed basis. A Hydraulic Project Approval from Washington Fish & Wildlife is required for this work. Smaller mats may be towed to shore and remove the sediment with hand tools. Other Submerged Plants Immediately following the whole-lake Sonar@ treatment in 1994, the submerged plant population (other than milfoil) in Steel Lake maintained at a moderate density. As a result, the small populations have not been causing a significant hindrance to recreational activity. Therefore, the intent of the control plan is to identify the dominant submerged plant community during the annual diver survey, an<l devise methods that can be used to maintain their density to levels that do not impact the beneficial uses of the lake. In addition, this program will not promote the growth of milfoil or other non-native submerged plants. Herbicide application is not anticipated. A moderate level of control will allow the submerged plant community to thrive, and allow a diverse fish and wildlife habitat. Methods considered will be focused on controls that do not adversely affect the existing populations of other native plants. For example, native submerged plants such as Nitella and Najas jIexilis do not grow tall enough or are not dense enough to hinder recreation in Steel Lake. These are important plants to protect since they provide valuable wildlife habitat and their presence eliminates plant habitat that might otherwise by available for invasion by one of the more nuisance plant types. 53 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAFT Each year, the Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee will review the findings of the annual diver survey, and determine the need for the implementation of manual methods to control targeted submerged plants. Manual methods don't require expensive permits, and can be performed on aquatic noxious weeds with Hydraulic Project Approval obtained by reading and following the pamphlet Aquatic Plants and Fish (publication #APF-I-98) available from the Washington Department ofFish & Wildlife. Examples of possible manual methods to be employed for control of submerged plants: . Depending upon plant densities and whether exotics are detected, additional diver time during the annual survey will be planned for hand-pulling native plants in beds that have been identified as potential problems. In deeper water, hand-pulling is best accomplished by divers with SCUBA equipment and mesh bags for the collection of plant fragments. In water less than three feet deep, homeowners may perform this activity, as no specialized equipment is required, although a spade, trowel, or'long knife may be needed if the sediment is packed or heavy. Some sites may not be suitable for hand pulling such as areas where deep flocculent sediments may cause a person hand pulling to sink deeply into the sediment. Hand-pulling of aquatic plants is similar to pulling weeds out of a garden. It involves removing entire plants (leaves, stems, and roots) from the area of concern, They are placed in a mesh bag, and disposed of in an area away from the shoreline, or composted. Cutting differs from hand pulling in that plants are cut and the roots are not removed. Cutting is performed by standing on a dock or on shore and throwing a commercially available non-mechanical aquatic weed cutting tool out into the water. Because of the lower pond weed biomass, hand-cutting for these plants is less labor intensive than that for water lily control. The equipment would be available to all property owners who wish to control small populations near their docks identified for control by the Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee. In some cases, raking may be identified as a preferred method in removing submerged plants. Attaching a rope to a rake allows removal of a greater area of weeds. Raking literally tears plants from the sediment, breaking some plants off and removing some roots as well. Specially designed aquatic plant rakes will be purchased for use by lake residents to control small populations near their docks identified for control by the Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee. . Yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus) Control and containment efforts on yellow flag iris will be conducted on an annual, as- needed basis. Each year, the Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee will review 54 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 INAL DRAFT the findings of the annual plant survey, and approve the methods to be used (aquatic herbicide and/or manual methods) for control and containment of yellow flag iris. Because yellow flag iris appears at the shoreline, individual homeowners will be responsible for the control of yellow flag iris colonies on their property. Fish Habitat Mitigation Plan The text below is adapted from "Aquatic Plants and Fish" published by the Department of Fish and Wildlife Publication # APF-I-98 Aquatic noxious weeds can adversely affect ecological functions by crowding out native vegetation and creating single species stands. While it is recognized that native aquatic plants can become a nuisance to swimmers and boaters due to excessive growth, it is important to recognize the value of native plant species for fish and wildlife. These native plants provide habitat for fish and wildlife, help stabilize shorelines, produce oxygen, trap beneficial nutrients, and keep sediment in place. For example, pondweed is a critical food source for waterfowl and marsh birds. Pondweed also provides cover from predators for warmwater fish such as perch and bass. Aquatic beneficial plants are defined as native plants (such as pondweeds, bladderwort, or coontail) or non-native plants not included on the King County noxious weed list. Warmwater gamefish often utilize vegetation in the shallow waters oflakes for spawning, early rearing, and feeding. Largemouth and smallmouth bass generally prefer ponds and reservoirs with abundant aquatic vegetation. Bluegill, sunfish and crappie also inhabit vegetated quiet or slow-moving waters for protection from predators. Too much vegetation can result in overpopulation if predators are unable to access prey species, while too little vegetation can also adversely affect the predator-prey balance and result in a decline in the fishery. Aquatic plants provide important living space for insects, snails and crustaceans, which in turn become food for fish and waterfowl. Vegetated areas support many times more of these tiny creatures than to do non-vegetated areas, The plants make important nurseries for young fish, frogs, salamanders, and other amphibians. Several species of reptiles, including turtles, garter snakes and water snakes use these areas for cover and forage. Removal of all non-native plant species within Steel Lake may have a short-term negative impact on warmwater fish populations due to a loss of habitat cover. With removal of the non-native vegetation, areas will likely re-seed with native plant species over the long- term. The recommended extent of native vegetative cover for fish habitat needs is 40% of 55 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 ORAfT the lake acreage (WDFW, personal communication). Previous surveys of the lake show an average of23 acres (50% lake coverage) of submerged native aquatic vegetation. Based upon results ofthe annual plant survey, the acreage of the native vegetation will be calculated. If there is less than 19 acres (40% coverage of the lake) of native aquatic vegetation cover, the Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee should determine whether mitigation measures are necessary to support wildlife species. If mitigation efforts are deemed necessary, native aquatic vegetation will be planted and/or wooden fish structures placed in the lake to supplement natural recovery efforts. Native vegetation may include floating leaved rooted plants such as Brasenia schreberi (water-shield); submerged plants such as Ceratophyllum demersum (coontail), Utricularia vulgaris (common bladderwort), and Potamogeton spp, (pondweeds); and submerged macroalgae such as Chara spp. (muskgrass) and Nitella sp. Fish structures may be composed of wood snags, root wads, or Engineered Large WoodTM secured to the bottom of the lake or some other stable environment. COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM The community education and involvement program for Steel Lake consists of four parts: (I) an Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee to oversee implementation of the plan, (2) a non-native aquatic plant identification and prevention plan, and (3) informational and workshop activities to alert homeowners to stormwater pollution prevention and best management practices (lawn, garden, home care activities) that protects the lake's water quality, Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Management Advisory Committee Proper implementation of the described plan relies upon formation of a Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Management Advisory Committee, The Aquatic Plant Advisory Committee is to be composed of representatives from the lakefront residential community, the City of Federal Way Surface Water Utility and the City of Federal Way Parks Art Recreation and Cultural Services Department. The duties and responsibilities of the Advisory Committee may be transferred to the Steel Lake Management District Steering Committee when created. The Advisory Committee will have the following responsibilities: Review annual plant survey information and determine the need for a second annual survey. Develop an annual aquatic plant management workplan based upon the information revealed in the annual plant surveys. The workp1an will prioritize aquatic weed problem areas and identify preferred control methods for each species. Assist the City of Federal Way with oversight of control work to keep contractors accountable. 56 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 FINAL DRAFT . Participate in preparation of an annual evaluation report that summarizes plant control activities, lake user's perspectives on the plant community, and recommendations for the next year's control strategy. Assist with presentation of aquatic plant management efforts to lake residents at an annual Steel Lake community meeting, Ensure that all lake residents, whether legal water rights users or not, receive proper notification pursuant to the requirements of the NPDES Noxious Weed Permit. Determine and participate in other annual community involvement and education strategies as needed. . Non-native Aquatic Plant Identification and Prevention Eradication and control efforts will only be successful if future infestations are prevented, or detected and eliminated soon after detection. Since the re-introduction of non-native aquatic plants to Steel Lake is almost certain, a prevention and detection plan is essential. A more informed community of residents and lake-users will be more likely to identify and report noxious aquatic weeds and other potential problems. - There are four main elements to the prevention plan, I. Annual distribution of educational materials, The Advisory Committee will compile published materials and generate literature specifically related to Steel Lake for distribution to alilakefront residents each year. 2. Annual plant identification workshops. At the annual Steel Lake community meeting, part of the meeting time will review native and non-native aquatic plant identification. Aquatic plant experts could be invited from the Department of Ecology, King County Noxious Weed Control Program, or other experts. 3. Improved signs. Improved noxious weed identification signs will be installed before and at the boat launch, in addition to the existing sign at the water's edge. The improved signs will identify the species of concern and illustrate how boat owners should clean their boats before entering and when leaving the lake. A trash receptacle will be provided next to the signs for proper disposal of the weeds. 4. Boater outreach. Volunteers from the Advisory Committee as well as other lake residents will conduct outreach efforts with boaters during opening day. Boaters will be given educational materials about non-native plants and instructed on how to prevent re-infestation of the lake. Boaters may be approached at the boat launch and/or on the water by other boaters. Non-Point Pollution Prevention Significant sources of nutrients can increase the occurrence of aquatic nuisance species such as cyanobacteria. Reducing the nutrient impacts to the lake will help reduce the outbreak of algae blooms. To protect the lake from water quality degradation, residents within the Steel Lake basin will be provide educational as well as instructional workshops on how to reduce the amount of nutrients running off of their yards, into the storm drain system, and into Steel Lake. One example of an effective program is King County's 57 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 FINAL DRAFT Natural Lawn Campaign including the Natural Yard Care program, The City of Federal Way currently participates in the Natural Lawn Campaign through the Solid Waste Division. The Natural Yard Care program is planned for implementation in the Steel Lake basin in Spring 2003. Other issues of concern for the non-point pollution prevention program include 1) maintenance of sewer system and septic fields, 2) reducing residential car washing activities, and 3) disposal ofresidential hazardous materials such as paints and car fluids. These topics may also be included in the community education and involvement program as determined by the Advisory Committee. PLAN EVALUATION The results of the aquatic plant control program must be evaluated against the goals set for the lake. In short, the program will have been a success if: 1) milfoil re-infestations are prevented; 2) the herbicide (glyphosate) treatment and manual controls implemented in designated fragrant water lily areas are successful to an extent that is acceptable by the majority of the lake users, and, 3) manual controls for water lily and native submerged plants are successful, reducing the populations to levels where they do not significantly impact the beneficial uses of the lake; or do not negatively impact fish and wildlife habitat. It should be noted that this is a working plan, it is not necessary that all the goals be achieved by some given date, but instead that the lake plant community is continually being evaluated against these goals and each years control plan is developed accordingly. The annual aquatic plant survey will provide the primary support for the evaluation plan. The results will provide evidence to evaluate: 1) if milfoil continues to be eradicated; 2) the extent of coverage of fragrant water lily beds; 3) whether beneficial submerged plants are continuing to inhabit much of the submerged plant habitat; 4) whether there are changes in the density of other native submerged plants, and 5) the effectiveness of fish mitigation efforts. Each year's plant survey results will be evaluated against the stated plant management goals to set the following year's plant control agenda, This evaluation will be supported by City of Federal Way Surface Water Management staff input. PLAN ELEMENTS, COSTS, AND FUNDING Table 9 provides a summary of each element identified in this plan and the associated costs. The total ten-year cost for the plan is estimated at $166,440, including a 5% rate of inflation each year, for an average of$16,644 per year. The majority of the cost occurs during the first year when equipment purchases all occur. Depending upon the revenue generated to support plan implementation, the Advisory Committee will determine which 58 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 FINAL DRAFT elements of the plan to implement on an annual basis. For example, the annual funds available may not cover all activities identified in this plan in year one (2003). Therefore, the Advisory Committee will need to prioritize activities based upon funds available, To implement this plan and provide a long-term funding source for continued plant control activities, public education, and evaluation, a stable long-term funding source is needed. Funding through the formation of a special taxing district, a Lake Management District (LMD), is to be completed by 2004, The Department of Ecology Aquatic Weeds Management Fund can be applied to for additional funds to augment funding provided by the LMD. However, Ecology grants require 25 % contribution from the applicant (City of Federal Way). Other possible funding sources include King County's Water Works and the Natural Resources Stewardship Network. In addition, the King County Noxious Weed Program has limited funds available to contribute to weed control projects. Table 9. Estimated Cost for Implementation of the Steel lake IAVMP Plan Element 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009- Total 13 10 vear Aquatic Mapping/Survey 4,000 4,200 4,410 4,630 4,860 28,170 50,270 and Reoort Milfoil eradication Spot herbicide treatment 1,725 1,810 1,900 1,995 2,095 12,150 21,675 12,4-0) (Note 1) NPDES oermit fee 100 100 100 100 100 500 1,000 NPDES permit notification 400 400 400 400 400 2,000 4,000 tNote 2\ NPDES monitorinq costs 1,000 1,050 1,100 1,155 1,210 7,000 12,515 Fraqrant water lily control Spot herbicide treatment 1,500 1,575 1,655 1,740 1,825 10,575 18,870 ¡~Ivohosate\ (Note 3\ NPDES oermit fee Note 4) - -- -- -- -- -- NPDES permit notification -- -- - -- -- (Note 4) Contract cullinq (Note 5) 1,200 1,260 1,360 1,385 1,455 8,420 15,040 Submeroed olant control Diver hand-oullinq (Note 6) 1,200 1,260 1,320 1,385 1,455 8,420 15,040 Equioment ourchases Weed culler 130 -- -- -- -- -- -- Rakes 200 -- - -- -- -- -- Fish habitat slructures 2,000 1,000 1,000 -- - -- 4,000 Pumo, oenerator & hose 200 -- -- -- -- Public education Prinlinq and Maiiinq 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 7,500 15,000 Natural Yard Care 3,500 -- -- -- - 4,000 7,500 Proqram Boater outreach 1,000 -- -- -- -- -- 1,000 Totals 19,655 13,255 14,745 14,290 14,900 88,735 166,440 59 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3,2003 DRAFT Costs are based on an annual increase of five percent (5%) Note 1. Note 2. Note 3. Note 4. Note 5. Note 6. Based on treating 3 acres 01 milloil, one time per year Beginning in 2003, a legal notice must be published in a local newspaper annually. An estimate based upon treating 2 acres fragrant water lily annually The same NPDES Noxious Weed Permit lor may be used both for milloil and fragrant water lily worn done in the same year. Assumes contract cutting at $150/hour for 2 days Assumes divers worning at $150/hour for 2 days Appendix A King County Water Quality Graphs 60 STEEL LAKE IAVMP APRIL 3, 2003 ~ -~ \ ~v ~ 0 ~ II~:S "',""','"",,.,.,/ "--'=¥ "~ -.''If-'' . ~ ~.', I,,'~ ~- ¡ 8 ~ ~ ' Steel lake ~ ro . 0 ~ ~ i :c- ~ --I .1-=- ------" 47.4 acres ~--' J -- ~ ~- 3 0 ~ ¿¡ ~ ~ ~ j5 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ j - = L._____-- --, ' , ~ jj 1 ro ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - CCJ-, : E ~ Figure 1. Steel lake Watershed & land Use ~ N 0 250 500 I I - Stann Drain Outfall D Sub-basin Boundary Wetlands D Common Ownership LANDUSE Park Commercial Quasi-Public 1,000 I ¡![---¡II Steel lake Park Boundary --+ Lake Outfall Channel D Steel Lake Shoreline Industrial D Multi-Family Feet Office Religious Services Single Family g Vacant c:\stlkbasln.mxd (/ <jz 0 N a N LO LO ã) OJ u.. ~~- ! ! °1 I o¡ ° - N II ó¡ °1 I OJ i lei I SZ ¡ I ,-,' ~: ¿I '-' , .r:! I õ..: i c3 i Q) ~ ro -1 Q) Q) U5 5- ro ¿ ,ñ ~ ~ " ~ .s :0 ~ ;¡; J! <D Q! ;õ N ¡¡j ro 0 cc ro :;; r ~ a ~ ro >- ~ ~ g ~ " ~ Ë >- ~ ~ æ a >- Õ " ~ >- g c a ro c " ~ " Ci ~ ~ E :¡- 0. ro ~ ro 11 ~ ~ I Figure 5. Steel' Lake Aquatic Plant Survey Results, August 1976 (Metro 1994) i I i /\/ Depth ~ Floating-leaved plants 0 Submerged macroalgae only ,,< Submerged macrophytes/algae Eurasian watermilfoil 6. N 100 0 100200 Feet 1"""";;-,-_c'_:C:':1 This is intended as a graphical representation only, The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy, Map Date: 8f76 lusers/tabithamlswmlstikbasi n.apr Figure 6. Steel Lake Aquatic Plant Survey Results, August 1979 (Metro 1994) N Depth ~ Floating-leaved plants D Submerged macroalgae only D Submerged macrophytes/algae Eurasian watermilfoil 100 0 100200 Feet ~---- -l ,I ~ N This is intended as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy, Map Date: 8/76 , . Ii lusers/tabltham\swm\stlkbasm,apr : ~ Figure 7. Steè'1 lake Aquatic Plant Survey Results Be.'fo.'. re Treatme:t with Sonar, May 1994 (RMI1995) ,~ .- N Depth ~ Floating-leaved plants D Submerged macroalgae only ¡i,!!",;':!:,!",! Submerged macrophytes/algae Eùrasian watermilfoil 100 0 100200 Feet ~,-,------' This Is Intended as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Map Date: 8/76 lusers/tabitham\swm\stlkbasin .apr ~ N I Figure 8. Steël Lake Aquatic Plant Survey Results Be-fore Treatme~VI with Sonar, September 1994 (RMI1994) , --~---- -j /\I Depth ~ Floating-leaved plants CJ Submerged macroalgae only I¡:,i::",':. Submerged macrophytes/algae Eurasian watermilfoil 6. N 100 0 100200 Feet ~_I-n-l ThiS is intended as a graphical representation only The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy- Map Date: 8/76 lusersllabilham\swm\stlkbasin .apr 0 .[ i !¡ I tJl í Ji ~+¡ , . ". . , ,< ~- t/) c 0 :¡:; cu () 0 ...J ..... () C t/) 0 c:¡:; CU :J ¡:::g ~.~ C:O :J..... (J)C .......!!! CQ.. ..!!! () Q..:¡:; .~ ~ ""'0" ~<1: 0" ..... <1: a¡ ~.§ CU CU ...J - .... <1>1- 2 Ô> (J)õ:. (D (J')"tJ (J') C T""CU (J') .... :J 0> U. 0 D E:Jo [ ,1 , 0 0 ri Q.. II ,I] 1 Q 10 .¡¡ ~+: j , . " I/) s:: 0 :¡:¡ ('i u 0 -.J .... u Q) s:: I/) 0 s:::¡:¡ ('i ::I .:::s I- >. .... Q) I/) £:0 ::I.... (I) s:: .... ('i s::ã: ('i ë: .~ UCO :¡:¡g. ~<1; 0".... <1; s:: Q) Q) .:.:E ('i"" -.J ~ - I- Q)!- Q) . .... (]) (1)1- <X)Q. m"D IDS:: 't"" ('i 0 't"" Q) I- ::I C) ü: ¡de. ulSeq ~IIS\LUMS\lUe~llqeI/SJasnl ",(oemooe s', 01 se .I¡UeJJeM ou sa~ew .IeM leJapa~ ¡o .III:) a41. ".I,uo UOI¡e¡uasaJdaJ 1e:>'4dCJ6 e se papua,uI Sl S141. 0 ~ - c rn ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ >- ~ [ ~ ~ i?; ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ I M"to" I IJ!!!!! De'" Eura"a' Water Mdto" --- Map Date 2002 Figure 14. 2001 Steel lake Secchi Depth (King County) [111 li:':-'::~~:'~~.. :ë 8.0 g no -.. .. ' tt, ~~~'t~'Z'Z~'t~'6,'b.~ ö ~ õ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ö ------ Figure 15. 2001 Steel lake Precipitation (King County) ~P recipitatio n -Lake Level, 'E' 100 T g 80 t :! :~ t CL .~ 20 Ii: 0.. .. .. 8 8 ~ ð ~ æ ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ' 6 00 ~ N N N N N - ~ - ~ ~ 100 . . E 75 ,£, -.; so 5 25 ~ '" -' Figure 16. 2001 Steel lake Temperature (King County) ,--- I ,..., 30.0 ' ~ 20.0 I 0- I! . Level 1 . Level 2 --..--- , --- ........It,,*~-' .. ...- . no ~~~~~. . 0.0. E; E; E; C;> , . , c Õ :> 0 '" 0 ~ õ ~ b b b b b 1:. ¿ ¿ ~ C:. .. '" CL '" ::> IL ¿ « ¿ ~ b b b b sg>~i> ~ « (I) 0 Figure 17. 2001 Steel Lake Phytoplankton Concentrations Total phytoplankton 2 0 >- ! >- c: c: ~ ~ ~ ~ gBG ~~~.w.w~~§ ~ N ~ ¿, iJ [!!chrys rIJdino Dother õ q N Phytoplankton Chart BG=Bluegreens; chrys=Chrysophytes; dino=Dinofiagellates Figure 18. 2001 Steel lake Chlorophyll Concentrations 15 Chlorophyll a 12 9 3 0 ~ 6 >- >- c: '" '" ::J :;;: :;;: 7 '" §~~~gg~~;g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¿, M ~ '" '" õ q '" Figure 19. 2001 Steel lake Total PhosphorousfTotal Nitrogen -<>- Total Phospohrus -.- Total Nitrogen 100 1000 Average N:P = 27.4 80 800 60 600 TP TN 40 ."""'.""""".--.-. 400 .---.--.-. 20 200 ~ 0 .0 >. >. c: '" '" ::J :;;: :;;: 7 '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,¡, ¿, ~ '" .w.w & & ~ ~ ~ ~ ¿, ~ t-- N '" c .s'* .~ ;g <! ß'S :J co :J '" cao..(J)~ EJDDD m ~ ~~ ~ ~ d H19Z ~ õ'" ~È~ê U~~~ H8~§ Wi. ~~H~ :>, <Iz ~ ~ () ,"C ¡If ~ 0 g Q) ..I<: ro ...J Qj 2 en C) c: 'õ c: :;:¡ e 5 en C/) C) c: :§ '5 c::! oð C/) ãj ~ ro a. Table 6. Relative Presence, Density, and Areal Coverage of Aquatic Plants In Steel Lake Common 1994" 1994" 1996' 1998' 2001' 2002' 2003' Relative Presence Name 1976' 1978' 1979' (Pre-Treat) (Post-Treat) Rooted Floating-Leaved Nymphaea odorata Waterlily Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant No data No data Nuphar lutea spp, v Watertil Present Present Present Present Present Absent Absent No data No data Nuphar variegatum Watertily Present Present No data No data I~::- Watershleld Present Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent No data No data ophytes No data No data fifolius Pondweed Present Present Dominant Dominant Present Present Present No data No data s Pondweed Dominant Dominant Present Dominant Absent Dominant Dominant No data No data Water purslane Present Present No data No data odea canadensis Wate",eed Present Present Present Present Absent Absent Present No data No data Na'as flexilis Naiads Dominant Dominant Dominant Unknown Unknown Present Present No data No data Myriophyllum spicatum Milfoil Absent Absent Absent Present Absent Absent Absent Present Present Ufricularia vulgaris Bladderwort Absent Absent Present Absent Absent Absent Absent No data No data Ceratoph lIum demersum Coontail Absent Present Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent No data No'data Submerged macroalgae Nitella sp. Nilella Present Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant No data No data Chara sp. Muskgee" Dominant Present Presenl Absent Absent Dominant Dominant No data No data Relative Densl of Submer ed Macro h tes North Shore Moderate Sparse Moderate Dense Sparse Dense Dense Moderate Moderate East Shore Moderate Sparse Sparse Dense Sparse Dense Dense None Sparse South Shore Moderate Sparse Sparse Dense Sparse Moderate Moderate None Sparse Areal Coverane facres) Floating-leaved plants 9.6 8,5 8,2 3.6 3.6 No data No data No data No data Submerçed macrophytesfalgae 19,1 8,6 6,2 6,5 0 No data No data No data No data Eurasian watennilfoil 0 0 0 1,3 0 No data No data 3 5 Submer ed macroatgae 0 8,9 126 23,6 31.4 No data No data No data No data Total 29 26 27 35 35 No data No data 3tmUroll} 5 tmllr,U} 'S'",œ M,'""" "" "79,200' 1m"',""',, 'S'",œ RM"'" 'S'.,œ H'~","""98 'S,",œ "",,',"'"" 200'lmilf," ,",,¡ . S'",œ 2003 , TO", p',""m., O""""mi."""r.. """,, ,"0'"", """'..mil."" Property assessed on dollar per unit Type # of Units RatelUnit Total ($) Percentage Undeveloped parcel 7 $30 $210 1% Developed parcel (1 single-family 89 $85 $7,565 57% dwelling) Parcel with mu1ti- 1 $275 $275 2% family dwelling City Park 1 $2,048 $2,048 15% Public Boat Launch 1 $3,500 $3,500 25% A.nnual Total $13,598 The estimated maximum amount that is proposed for the LMD in 2004 is $13,598. An automatic increase based on the Seattle Consumer Price Index (CPI) will be included in each annual billing after 2004. At no time is the increase to be more than five (5) percent per year. Total maximum LMD rate revenue for the ten year LMo' based on an annual five percent increase for inflation is $166,440, Issuance of revenue bonds is not proposed. The attached Steel Lake Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan includes an estimated itemization of the use of these funds for the ten-year period. The LMD budget and rates will be approved through a public hearing and a public vote after the city council adopts a resolution to form the LMD. Once approved by the public and city council, the annual rates and charges may not be altered without another public vote and city council approval with the exception of the CPI increase described above. 5. Steel Lake Management District Steering Committee The volunteer Steel Lake Management District Steering Committee is proposed to represent the interests of LMD property owners in the various neighborhoods around the lake. City staff will work with the Steering Committee to develop the annual work plan. The annual LMD work plan and budget will be forwarded by the Steering Committee for implementation by the City's surface water utility. The Steering Committee will track and review activities and expenditures by the City as well as outside contractors. City staff will provide Steering Committee support including quarterly financial reports. Attachment Steel Lake Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan 2 en ~ ~~ 5'0 . ... 'C ~B~O III~ [8J! I; ..~ S' ;¡: râ (þ c 111- ; ~r- II J[i~ il 0 03: , I() '"0 t» I i :D:J I III t» I~ ~ ~ 3 (þ ;i :J IIi o~ 9- I ~ ~ ~i g ñ :1 - A ì Ii ,\ II i.¡t ! ! VIcIn/Iy Map II~",~...,...,... 4- i: 'i' II II, . il .~, :' \..8'1""""...."", Duo: ¡,()t. Th"""'--"':J:"".......n;«t.....- ~ ~-r~;"~~==:~ ~ ~~ ..:.,-:-~~~. S 301 PL I/~ . qllWllJJllUI~U /.-..J l--_- . ~-J . " j CJ) L5 ~1308 CT co ,... CJ) > < 0 C\I en ~ gJ S en/310 5T > < æl ~11 STI "I 2I2OO3.."J S 310 8T Petition to the Federal Way City Council to create a Lake Management District for Steel Lake ~,2003 lj-p{l/ -3 Signature of property owner Full address Parcel number (if known) ~~ J£¡V/<'.""J<;. <S¿:: lit//'- 3 04/14/2003 MON 07: 27 FAX 4252378281 ENABLING TECHNOLGY ~004 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 3 Petition to the Federal Way City Council to Crate a Lake management District for Steel Lake We, the undersigned Steel Lake property owners, request that the Federal Way City Council approve the creation of a Lake Management District (LMD) for Steel Lake pursuant to RCW 36,61 I' I Name Address Phone: Date: Parcel # (if known) Petition to the Federal Way City Council to Crate a Lake management District for Steel Lake We, the undersigned Steel Lake property owners, request that the Federal Way City Council approve the creation ora Lake Management District (LMD) for Steel Lake pursuant to RCW 36.61 I I Name Address Phone: Date: Parcel # (if known) I I -z..n f;' .>'ì..,,;c¡ z-i' L-f-7f) Petition to the Federal Way City Council to Crate a Lake management District for Steel Lake We, the undersigned Steel Lake property owners, request that the Federal Way City Council approve the creation ofa Lake Management District (LMD) for Steel Lake pursuant to RCW 36.61 I I Name Address Phone: Date: Parcel # (if known) I I 6xL'dPMRK1A B~fJ> 301/'i- r(t!¡fvE. So. :J5"3~939-tf/ra 1hÞ=3 MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL ITEM# ~ SUBJECT: 2003, First Round, Tourism Enhancement Grant Awards BUDGET IMP ACT: CATEGORY: X CONSENT RESOLUTION 0 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING 0 OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $34,000 $25,200 $ ATTACHMENTS: Memo to Council Committee and attached grant applications SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:Twòroülids of the Toiir;s~ Enhancèment-Gfant-ãrè i;;ë¡il<ïè<ï in the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee's work program and budget for 2003. The total amount budgeted for the grant program in 2003 is $34,000. These grants are intended for not-for-profit organizations engaged in sports or cultural events in Federal Way that will bring out-of-town visitors to the City, During this first round of grant applications for 2002, seven applications were received for a total amount requested of$51,200, as detailed below: USSSA ofW A, Seattle "Major" N.I.T. Softball Tournament- 7/18-20/2003 Pac. NW US Synchronized Swimming, 2003 United Airlines Open- 7/15-19/2003 Rhododendron Species FoundationlTacoma Concert Band, Concert in the Park-8/7/2003 Federal Way United Soccer Club, Blast Off Soccer Toumament-8/8-1O/2003, 8/15-17/2003 USSSA ofW A Men's "C" NW Divisional National Champ. Softball Tournament 8/31-9-2 King Aquatic Club, 2003 US Open Swimming Championship-12/2-6/2003 Tacoma-Pierce Sports Comm., WlAA Gridiron Classic HS State Football-12/5-6/2003 $5,000 $10,000 $4,200 $2,000 $5,000 $20,000 $5,000 The applications were reviewed by the Tourism Enhancement Grant Review Subcommittee on April 10, 2003 and were subsequently reviewed by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee on April 18, 2003, The LTAC recommended awarding Tourism Enhancement Grants to all but one of the seven applicants in the amounts itemized below, for a total of $25,200. This leaves $8,800 in potential grant monies for the second Year 2003 grant round. In addition, there is a total of $15,000 in LTAC funds in the Council-approved budget available to augment the Tourism Enhancement Grant funding during this biennium, This additional amount may be applied in whole or in part to any of the four grant rounds of the biennium, USSSA ofW A, Seattle "Major" N.I.T. Softball Tournament--7/18-20/2003 Pacific NW US Synchronized Swimming, 2003 United Airlines Open-7/15-19/2003 Rhododendron Species FoundationlTacoma Concert Band, Concert in the Park-8/7/2003 Federal Way United Soccer Club, Blast Off Soccer Tournament--8/8-10/2003, 8/15-17/2003 USSSA ofW A Men's "C" NW Divisional National Champ. Softball Tournament 8/31-9-2/2003 King Aquatic Club, 2003 US Open Swimming Championship--12/2-6/2003 Tacoma-Pierce Sports Comm" WlAA Gridiron Classic HS State Football-12/5-6/2003 $2,500 $5,000 $4,200 $1,000 $2,500 $10,000 $0 -.-. .----.-.-.-.-.--.-..-. --- -- .-.---.----. - .. .--.-.-- .....-.- ----.-.-..."..-.-.-.-.----.- CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its April 24, 2003 meeting, the FEDRAC recommended Tourism Enhancement Grants the Tax Committee. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MEMORANDUM Date: To: Via: From: Subject: April 18, 2003 Finance, Econo David H. Patrick 0 ic D ve10pment and Regional Affairs Committee anager y Director, Community Development Services a cement Grant awards BACKGROUND Two rounds of the Tourism Enhancement Grant are included in the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee's work program and budget for 2003. The total amount budgeted for grant awards if $34,000. These grants are intended for not-for-profit organizations engaged in sports or cultural events in Federal Way that will bring out-of-town visitors to the City, During this first round of grant applications for 2003, seven applications were received, as detailed below: USSSA of W A, Seattle "Major" N.I.T, Softball Toumament- 7 /18-20 $5,000 Pac. NW US Synchronized Swimming, 2003 United Airlines Open-7/15-19 $10,000 Rhododendron Species Foundation/Tacoma Concert Band, Concert in the Park-8/7 $4,200 Fed. Way United Soccer Club, Blast Off Soccer Toumament-8/8-1O, 8/15-17 $2,000 USSSA ofWA Men's "C"NW Divisional National Champ. Softball Toum, 8/31-9-2 $5,000 King Aquatic Club, 2003 US Open Swimming Championship--12/2-6 $20,000 Tacoma-Pierce Sports Comm., WIAA Gridiron Classic HS State Football-12/5-6 $5,000 A copy of each application submittal is attached to this memo. The Federal Way Tourism Enhancement Grant Review Subcommittee reviewed each of these applications on April 10, 2003. The Committee recommendations are as follows: USSSA ofWA, Seattle "Major" N.I.T. Softball Tournament-7/18-20 $2,500 Pac. NW US Synchronized Swimming, 2003 United Airlines Open-7/15-19 $5,000 Rhododendron Species Fonndation/Tacoma Concert Band, Concert in the Park-8/7 $4,200 Fed. Way United Soccer Club Blast Off Soccer Toumament-8/8-10, 8/15-17 $1,000 USSSA ofWA Men's "c" NW Divisional National Champ, Softball Tourn. 8/31-9-2 $2,500 King Aquatic Club, 2003 US Open Swimming Championship--12/2-6 $10,000 Tacoma-Pierce Sports Comm., WIAA Gridiron Classic HS State Football-12/5-6 $0 CI City of Federal Way Tourism Enhancement Grant Subcommittee Recommendations Apri11Oth,2003 United States Specialty Sports Association of Washington / Seattle "Ma'or" N.I.T, Softball Tournament 7/18-7/20 $5,000 $2,500 Pacific Northwest Association of United States Synchronized Swimming / 2003 United Airlines 0 en 7/15-7/19 $10,000 $5,000 Rhododendron Species Foundation / Tacoma Concert Band Concert in the Garden 8/7 or 8/8 $4,200 $4,200 Federal Way United Soccer Club / Federal Way United Blast Off (Youth 8/8-8/10, Soccer Tournament 8/15-8/17 $2,000 $1,000 United States Specialty Sports Association of Washington / USSSA Men's "C" NW Divisional National Cham ionshi s Softball Tournament 8/31-9/2 $5,000 $2,500 King Aquatic Club / 2003 U.S. Open Swimmin Cham ions hi 12/2-12/6 $20,000 $10,000 Tacoma-Pierce County Sports Commission Amateur Athletic Fund / WIAA Gridiron Classic (High School State Football Cham ionshi s 12/5-12/6 $5,000 $0 ITotal: 7 Applications »> $51,200 $25,2001 The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee has allocated $34,000 in total to be applied towards the Tourism Enhancement Grant for the two rounds in 2003. In addition, there is a total of $15,000 in the Council-approved budget available to augment the Tourism Enhancement Grant funding during this biennium, This additional amount may be applied in whole or in part to any of the four grant rounds of the biennium, c.;) ~~/~lIL~~~ 14;~':J L~b-/"':J-lb::J':J u::>::>::>... w... ::>,...,t:. r...= <I'" RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MAR 3 1 2003 GRANT APPLICATION GRANT APPLICA nON INSTRUCTIONS; Read the entire packet, including the attached .selection criterj¡¡ before completing this application, Please type or print Answer each question to the best of your ability. The BOARD does not próvide funding for tournament entry fees, travel, lodging, meals, uniforms, equipment, coaches. sa1aries~. facility upgrades or capilat campaigns. If a question is not applicable w.your event, simply write "N/A" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver yoU! completed application to the address' listed below. Attn:Patrick Doherry, TEG Applicarion City of Federal Way P,O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 APPLlCANT'SNAME;~~£.Q., Ì). \J" !;.o'" ORGANIZATION:, c;.(Ñt~b ST~ ~JAL"'1 .$øoe.1'S ~. (ll<c;.~) of ~ASH'...c;"J'1:)fJ IS A QUALIFIED 5010 ORGANIZATION~ FEDERAL TAX ID:9<f, .!tl\" oS'? STREET ADDRESS: .5'10 Ñ>. 81.4-4 5E.A1TLJ; UA , '1¿43 DAYTIME TeIephone:(~) "71Jtf- 9/1 ~ Fax: (,;(;¡ ~ð!/-II..« Official Event Name:. c- 'Çç- .a-rTL¡; " . " tf]A.:"~ . IV. r. -r. Briefly describe the event (type Ofactivig. female. co-cd, etc): t).,,- trl- 11... ..s"uui ~t',.\\ "'Tt....:tlbl;"¡""f:"'~ 11'<& "TWt; NATION 4rr1lAd1"'~ '1ò4£ 11)4' T"~ . .'" " .., LJ ~'- 5r't"', AIL 'It""" fðll. A Pp.Y.T'tttIDU<tV"'DIJ"\.:5~I2IE.S .D~If!TH. Scope of Event (che¡;k 1): Local State ReRionaI ð Tnt~~tional 03/31/03 MON 16; 43 ¡TX/RX NO 9207] C5 Has this event ever been held in. Federal Way? ~ . . . .. ~ t~s ~v~nt ever ~n h*ld in Ki~ Goun~7 ~ Pi~rc~ Coun~'~ ~0 Ify~. When: Month: Year: Venue: Ci~ EVE~ ~NANCIAL ~FOR~TION . . I~ a ~st fee requlred?~lf~o, what amouar? ~ ~or % of ~o~eds . . ~at is .~e projected ~humb~ Of ~ickem ~at will ~e *old? Avemg~ tick~ price: $ ~ Event's ~taJ estimat*d expenses: ~o~t of expenses I~al host is responsible for? 1~'~ ~ Evers tot~ estim~d r~*nu~s~[ ~ ~ ~ ~at potion of the event's proe~ will ~ k~t by the local ho~t? $ 03/31/03 M0N 16:43 [TX/~ NO 9207] 133/31/213133 14: 3'3 2135-78'3-155'3 U~~~A WA ~IAII:. I"'I-\\:>"- 1:14 VENUE INFOR1\1ATlON . Proposed locaf.¡enue: . F'"Æ..~"'rU.l WAf Location: C" I~RQ.A-T,nÑ . P.12k Proposed dates: .-J ~ . fA -Zl'I ~~~ J Have youconfiimed the av<1ilability of the proposed dates at the primary venue@ NO Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues? YES B c ~ TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (bi)th comperitiortand practice sitO$) $ 1'2.00- ECONOMIC IMPACT How many participants wilÙhe ."ent attract? . :!l{)n How many teams/groups:wìl1 the event attract? 2.'4 Tt:A "" S How far away will the (athleie/participants) travel (local, regional, national, intemationaI)?~"",L How máay spectalOrs will the event anract? ¡S(J(}-=ll:1OO How faraway win spectators tra~1 ftom? .c:tRa.tÑD "'T\.I4: u-c;. Howmany suppOrt (staff,.vendot, :etc)people wi the event attract? ~ - 12 OCthe nwnbÚslistedabove. whatpercentage will require overnight lodging? Partipan!S Spectators ~.ç 10 't9 % Teams/Groups 2.4Ç % Event Staff 75'" % $ 5,000 ~ . I GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED: 03/31/03 MON 16: 43 [TX/RX NO 9207] Cl b~1 ~1I Lbb~ ,q; ~'; Lb"-{J:j';-",::>'; U"""" WA "'A'I:. "'A"I:. b::> How will these grant funds be utiHzed? Please list the c;>ther sources of financial.suppon (sponsorship, etc.) which you have pursued: Source: ~""'c>&AnAQ.ð. ~R . commi!ted~ NO Amount: . $ ~,. -+~a:.r . S"¡\A= 1."\o"iØT". ç{)"t:.~ .cornmitted@ NO Amount: $ C::<:¡)U .~ Committed: YES NO Amount: $ . Theundersígned certify the infonnarion pro'(ided above is true and accurate ðnd anyprojectioris are básed on history of simiiar events arid activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local ~'~~ Applicant'sSigturf'. .....~ .- AppHcant'sTitle:A'I:~ ~1)'Q""'Td~ Date: '-Y~LL"I. ~~S. PttD~ '1>.auxø" £'\Jbc-r OAlaAHI u:A. cß 03/31/03 MON 16:43 [TX/RX NO 92071 RECEIVED BY """"""N'TV T1coVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GRANT APPLICATION MAR 3 1 2003 GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS: Read the entire packet, including the attached selection criteria before completing this application. Please type or print. Answer each question to the best of your ability. The BOARD does not provide funding for tournament entry fees, travel, lodging, meals, unifonns, equipment, coaches salaries, facility upgrades or capital campaigns. If a question is not applicable to your event, simply write "N/ A" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver your completed application to the address listed below. Attn: Patrick Doherty, TEG Application City of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 APPLICANT'S NAME: Peggy McKasy ORGANIZATION: Pacific Northwest Association of United States Synchronized Swimming FEDERAL TAX ill: 91-1868181 IS A QUALIFIED 501@;) ORGANIZATION yes STREET ADDRESS: 31002 39th Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 DAYTIME Telephone: (253)952-5608 Fax: (253)952-5877 Official Event Name: 2003 United Airlines Open Briefly describe the event (type of activity, male, female, co-ed, etc): Female Synchronized Swimming athletes &om at least four international countries as well as ¡¡-om the United States will be coming to Federal Way to compete in this event held at the Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatic Center July 15-19, 2003. The competition is comprised of both a Junior (14-18 years of age) and a Senior level (14 and over).The event has been held at venues throughout the US since 1991, but it will be the flfSttime a concerted effort has been made to invite International Teams. The US Junior National team as well as US National team II will represent the United States, and the Junior National teams ¡¡-om Canada, Mexico, China and Japan will also be attending.. Scope of Event (check 1): Local State Regional National X International Cï Previous Hosts: YEAR 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 CITY/STATE Venue Detroit, Michigan Kona, Hawaii New Haven, Connecticut 5t Peter, Missouri Hilo, Hawaii Has this event ever been held in Federal Way? No Has this event ever been held in King County? No Pierce County? No rfyes, when: Month: Year: Venue: City: EVENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION Is a host fee required? No If so, what amount? What is the projected number of tickets that will be sold? 1000 (estimate 500 per finals event) Average ticket price: $7 Event's total estimated expenses: $17,000 Amount of expenses local host is responsible for? All expenses Events total estimated revenues? $13,650 What portion of the event's proceeds will be kept by the local host? 90% to host; 10% to King County VENUE INFORMATION Proposed local venue: Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatic Center Location: 650 SW Campus Drive, Federal Way, W A 98023-8425 Proposed dates: July 15-19 clO Have you confinned the availabilitY of the proposed dates at the primary venue? Yes Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues? Yes TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competition and practice sites) $11,250 ECONOMIC IMPACT How many participants will the event attract? 300+ How many teams/groups will the event attract? 40+ How far away will the (athlete/participants) travel (local, regional, national, international)? All categories How many spectators will the event attract? 1000 How far away will spectators travel from? International, Regional, Local How many support (staff, vendor, etc) people will the event attract? 75 Of the numbers listed above, what percentage will require overnight lodging? Partipants Spectators Teams/Groups 100% Event Staff 30% 100% 40% I GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED: $10,000 How will these grant funds be utilized? To promote the event, provide webcasting, pay facilitY and hospitalitY costs, and other necessary expenses; as well as to support local grassroots efforts to develop the sport in the region, Please list the other sources of financial support (sponsorship, etc.) which you have pursued: Source: usss $750 committed CAI Title Sponsorship Other Sponsorships $20,000 seeking seeking seeking Tacoma-Pierce County Sports Commission Grant $2,000 The undersigned certifY the information provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based on history of similar events and activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local conditions. Applicant's Signature {9'f1 ~K ð-4<j Applicant's Title: Event Director Date: 3/30/03 c.x¿ GRANT APPLICATION GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS: Read the entire packet, including the attached selection criteria before completing this application. Please type or print. Answer each question to the best of your ability. The BOARD does not provide funding for tournament entry fees, travel, lodging, meals, uniforms, equipment, coaches salaries, facility upgrades or capital campaigns. If a question is not applicable to your event, simply write '"N/ A" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver your completed application to the address listed below. Attn: Patrick Doherty, TEG Application City of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 .- RECEIVED BY COMMUNI1Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MAR 3 1 2003 \\'.-,~.......~.. t. .....~ APPLICANT'S NAME: Rhododendron Species Foundation ORGANIZATION: Rhododendron Species Foundation FEDERALTAXID: 93"6033854 IS A QUALIFIED 501({;> ORGANIZATION YES STREET ADDRESS: 2525 South 296th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 DAYTIME Telephone:(25 3) 838 - 464 6 Fax: (251> 838-4686 Official Event Name: Tacoma Co~rt Band Concert in the Garden I' Briefly describe the event (type of activity, male, female, co-.:d, etc): Tacoma Concert Band Summer Performance in the Rhododendron Species Botanical Garden Scope of Event (check I): Local State * Regional National International *puget Sound C-13 Previous Hosts: YEAR CITY/STATE Venue N/A Has this event ever been held in Federal Way? NO Has this event ever been held in King County? NO Pierce County?- NO If yes, when: Month: Year: Venue: City: EVENT FINANCIAL INFORMA nON Is a host fee required? NO If so, what amount? $ 0 00 or % of proceeds N / A What is the projected number of tickets that will be sold? FREE EVENT Average ticket price: $ N / A Event's total estimated expenses: $ 4,200 . 00 Amount of expenses local host is responsible for? $ 4,200.00 Events total estimated revenues?$ N/A What portion of the event's proceeds will be kept by the local host? $ N/A 0'"1 VENUEINFO~TION Proposed local venue: Rhododendron Species Foundation Botanical Garden Location: Federal Way, Washington Proposed dates: August 7 or 8, 2003 Have you confirmed the availability of the proposed dates at the primary venue~ NO Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues? YES ~ TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competition and practice sites) $ 0.00 ECONOMIC IMPACT How many participants will the event attract? 60 musicians N/A How many teams/groups will the event attract? How far away will the (athlete/participants) travel (local, regional, national, international)? Pu Q'e t Sound re g i on How many spectators will the event attract? 500 + How far away will spectators travel tTom? 25 miles How many support (staff, vendor, etc) people will the event attract? 20 Of the numbers listed above, what percentage will require ovemight lodging? unknown % Teams/Groups Event Staff N(A % Partipants Spectators 0 % 0 % I GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED: $ 4200.00 C-l5 How will these grant funds be utilized? The grant funds will cover the band fee, production costs (stage and chair rental), sound system, generator, security, and nxes. Please list the other sources offmancial support (sponsorship, etc.) which you have pursued: Source: N/A Committed: YES NO Amount: $ Committed: YES NO Amount: $ Committed: YES NO Amount: $ The undersigned certify the information provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based on history of similar events and activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local conditions. Applicant's Signature f2t ~~<:> J Applicant's Title:ú?- e't-çG-önl/F; O¡¡lÐL:tlSl-Date: 3-~\- D~ 7)0 ~O!Md f2~¿ . ----f8~ ~ {')cJ ß,oo 5{)û if 'J. (D () 3 tQð cCA-ez..,.u..ç ~~# 6't~~-' ~tt ¿ reI hM! C¡(o " RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARmENT FEB 2 1 2003 GRANT APPLICATION GRANT APPLICA nON INSTRUCTIONS: Read the entire packet, including the attached selection criteria before completing this application, Please tYpe or print. Answer each question to the best of your abilitY. The BOARD does not provide funding for tournament entry fees, travel, lodging, meals, uniforms, equipment, coaches salaries, facilitY upgrades or capital campaigns. If a question is not applicable to your event, simply write "NI A" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver your completed application to the address listed below. Attn: Patrick Doherty, TEG Application CitY of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 APPLICANT'S NAME: Perr)/ Wood -f'tly cL ORGANIZATION: F-edt'Yt't1 Wa)/ U VI Ir T-frf SðCrT'r- (. (""h FEDERAL TAX ID: '11- Iì ro5'o 'f I IS A QUALIFIED 50 I «:> ORGANIZA nON ~ STREET ADDRESS: 'L')Z-Iq L(J J::.d Fi, S I bnt; w;4-1~tl?2- 4//5-" DAYTIME Telephone:!'?,)) 7 ??- 7&' J r Fax: ! ¿sJ ì ?J - '11'1 tJ Official Event Name: F-e,{t'YilCL ÚJa >/ Uh ;r-eð{ ßIi1t<T' o-t:ý Briefly describe the evenl (type of activity, male, female, co-ed, etc): T Ju;: I' f "L- 'yð'-1r-t, 50(('1' r- r~/;t "'ham.,., 'f-" f:t2.r. m~L. ~ -Çt'M &4/"(' -t-'t"~W¡ 5- ~_ICJ T ð ----12--.S-0r-:. oJ..f.. Un,'}-1"d St-~.b~~ T eo,.." )1 Scope of Event (check 1):__Loca' _.5gtc~egiOnal Natioll!!L- --'m<:£'J<tlig-'!<1I en Previous Hosts: YEAR CITY/STATE Venue r-h;;¡ -e ~ lA/A ( .(-""-7 h d -e&>L ,',..., Ç.,.Al"yd WAC;' ,/ CihA h¿f({ b.,ø,....., h-.ebt. j¡.,øy.¿ {2ð y- f-ðl4r-j-V'1"YJ \/~4Y5 , / Has this event ever been held in Federal Way? A-J U/¿:¡), ("' Has this event ever been held in King CountY? A-/u/dy ( Pierce CountY?_1lJ 0 !fyes, when: Month: Year: /170 -loG <- Venue: CitY: ~ vteJ/a£ UJa >' EVENT FINANC[AL INFORM A nON Is a host fee required? ,AIO If so, what amount? $ or % of proceeds What is the projected number of tickets that will be sold? Irr, () Teams ~ 1S-0,ðONc4 ?2,otJO / Average ticket price: $ ?)(;.OO Event's total estimated expenses: $ Amount of expenses local host is responsible for'l $ /1-[ C Events total estimated revenues?L-h.~ () 0 () What portion of the event's proceeds will he kept by the local host? $ A- L L- GI'¿ VENUE INFORMATION Proposed local venue; {-eJ-f' bra hð'" p-~ ¿"4/;;O*'- Location; 4L 1- ,~ Ý\ -S:""~'I"yd F¿:rý~ ST-eRL / "?ÞfJ ¡:;qcc¡i'~Llv"'~ Wtlfy r Proposed dates; A-~~Þ- ¡-¡Ø c(J1~ I)-I? , Have you confirmed the availability of the proposed dates at the primary venue? ~ NO Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues? YES ~ ? 00 I 0 0 TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competition and practice sites) $ ECONOMIC IMPACT How many participants will the event attract? Z 100 pllty.o'.j J..-C(u((.Ä.M.... ì How many teams/groups will the event attract? '~O How far away will the (athlete/participants) travel (IOCal,9national, international)?- How many spectators will the event aUract? f! 7 'J() 3' -r:ðy- [' '" ~~ P /4y,..r How far away will spectators travel from? S l' 0 k-a?l1 J To P t7f'- -¡- / ~ How many support (staff, vendor, etc) people will the event attract? .1°0 Of the "umbers listed above, whal percentage will require overnight lodging? Partipa"ts % Teams/Groups Event Staff t % --_O% Spcctators___-_.. s-...._-Yo ¡[{A-NT AMOUNT REQUESTED J $ ¿OOO,OO 01 How will these grant funds be utilized? ~ ....--J. /' <:> " Lv~ Ivg~ ~ r",-- C-r-..;l-- /0 Ju/I'" /'A.y rCJr- I ~ r. '7 ,.~~ Woe. fJrÞV,~ ~ ¡pJ~. ~.. Ct'ac4.,. "'L. /,ré':Þ-'Þ'e::uv1. ~ Wo~ ~a... /¡.,t-......e ¿is r ~ p),Ç)~ .v"1"1~"to rl.¿ pr~þ'----.- Please list the other sources of financial support (sponsorship, etc.) which you have pursued: Source: ßqk- ~ Committed: ~ NO .eJr. Amount: $ 2- sc? ¿J (/ L-e~ (,p¿y-}{ f~dÞ:J'~erl:~ G7lfJ1.yryt!(vPt-- by /YIårrj'~ Committed: YES c§:) Amount: $ ¿OO¡!)O S't'~ l-oc.d (jlc.¿. "'-'; 1/ b "'-,y 5 ""'~ ¿[~ ~ s:.~r- ,Pro..s-;-<?~~ NO Amount: $ ]'¿Jé>¡C'O The undersigned certifY the information provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based on history of similar events and activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local conditions. A"Ii,,""> SO",..re ~/)¡/~-<' Applicant's Title: To"'rfJt7ho..~ Ð,;'--'n: ;/¿.......Date: 2) foe" r", ..~.v ¿ 00.-1 py"~j~..1" t='.ee/Y>rJ Wc<,y Ú¡.,/'f...Pl.. .faCt: er- (..1",6 cw "":>1':>11 L""".:> 1'1;':>~ L"'b-"'~-1b::J~ U::>::>::>I-I WI-I ::>'1-1,"- RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAR'TMENT MAR 3 f 2003 GRANT APPLICATION GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS: R~ad the enrire packet, including the attached seJecrion criteria before compl~ting this application. Please type or print. Answer each question to the best of your . ability. The' BOARD does not provide funding fot tournament entry fees, [ravel, lodging, meals, unifonns, equipment, coa~hes salaries, facility upgrades or capiral campaigns. [fa'question is not applicable toyour event, simplywri!e "NtA" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver your .completed application ro the address listed below. . Attn: Pamck Doherty, TEG. Application City of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 .Federal Way.. WA 98063-9718 APPLICANT'S NAME: ::b ~ t!... J D O)WANIZATION:(u.~"~-&.tJA) U.,ITAb -S-rRft.S _~"U..'I'j SA:>an: AS!;.. IS A QUALIFIED 501~ORGANIZATION~ FEDERAL TAXID:9'1 .JJl1 ,';L.1 STREET ADDRESS: - ~In IIIð 8"~ "T S«AlTUJ ,J4 '. J ~Rlo:J. DAYTIME Telepbone:(2./::1(. ) 7"'- qJ~ Fax:~ 71/'~ 91 T3 'Official Event'Name: u.~'¡<"", "" II!: II ~ . .. c. " NuJ DUJlIrlllNAl tJA1" ~,.P's "'..IS WILl. alE TOle TO,"'" T~' Brieflydescribe the even!, (type ofactiviry, male, female, co-ed. erc): FIDto\ 1&14 ".J .", -~, f .A~"'" cø""peTi...c¡...."....LAC... O'I'~ÇøA .. SfOT'N TW~ ~L,þ' c::1t_~..øoCs""As' ~. ~t. ...~~ .s'~1' I.-z.\ I"" .sT'Cu"",,, ..17.. """"'4-. AI.O../tW,'TM' T"~, .",e.,1'MJE .14IIcJ.. 81: 14ÞST""( -rift. ,"""""$ IlIJc,. ~~tC C:,...,.:S ~\w.M ..,h"L "'~.2L noli""". Ttd:.\~ ...",/ .«.JI#( IN ".-, "..I1"IG"..\Jlðu..us or.. ......It.r1JM"""~" ... I~ III tA~ P"'aT" ~ CWl, A&,l1",/. T. AI!> .""n¡£ ."'AT'......" ~-~".Uh"t Scope of Evenr (check I): LoCal s[ate(9 Nariona! Intema!ionai CLI 03/31103 MON 16: 43 [TX/RX NO 9207] w, ~., LUU~ LUU 'UJ .U~J UUUUH nH U'H.~ Previous Hosts: YÉAR CITY/STATE Venue .~ w""'" . ,.."d~.si:'J) ',....~ UIc.TDQ.,~ D& ~/t",t....8. £.Jt:.r4'f"!r. H~LJ) 11'1 . Ç'~Ð~..L Ú)Þlf:Øil~4- TW" LAs... J r~AtlS Has thisevenrever been held in Federai Way? ~II ~Nc) Pierce County?- . , Has this eVent ever been held In King County? Ifye$, when: . Month: Year: Venue: City: ~vtNTFINANCIAL INFORMA nON ... . . .\1;.;. ~ Is a host feereqUired?4~-,"Jf so, what amount? s.3 1M or % of Droceeds --- What is the pr?jec!ed number. ~f!ickets that will be sold? 8trJ - (Dl'JD sJlcio Average. ticket price: .... - . Event's toni! estimated expenses: $/~.J 1!JtV:J Amount of expenseslocai host is resporisible for? $ ALL . Events total estimated revenue5?$7,.5ðll.Dn WhÌlt~ortion ofth~ event'.~ proceeds will be kept by the local host? $ ø c.:¿1. 03/31/03 MON 16:43 [TX/RX NO 9207] "~I ~'-I """~ .L'<. ~, ""O-/O"-.LO"" U""':>H WH ""H'I:. I"'H"I:. VENUE iNFORMÁTION. Proposed ¡o;,al venue: ~Ii haRÁI. úJ'-I Location: eiÆ< ß~A4r,.,:, . ß&It Proposed dates:. AU" .11;!t - ~~èÞr 2" .2ðð~ Ii."e you confirmei¡:thè availability rifthe proposed date. at the primary venue@ NO Will you have a neèd for secondar)' or practice venues? (§) NO TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competirion and pracrice sires) $ J~"""~ ECONOMICIMPACT .. How maný participants will the evem attracr? ....!lOð How many teall1Slgtoups will the event attract? 2.0 (C' ""'-9 112- flu.. S"1'1IWfC. How far away will rh~ (arhlerdparricipants) travel (locaI'~~n9ational, intemational)?- How many SpeCTaTOrS will the event auracr? I()(jfj H.owfar away will spectators travel from? R~lðlllI1llL - . How ¡nany suPPOtt{sta(T, vendor:.etc) people will me event REtracr? /2. Of me n)Jri¡bers .listedabove, what percentage will require overnight lodging? Parripams Spectators iJ}.7f) If) ..% % Teams/Groups Event Staff /.0.,0 ?S % % /GRANTAMOUNTREQUESTED: $ ~OOO !!! CZ:3 03/31/03 MON 16: 43 [TX/RX NO 9207] t:J~1 ~!I Lt:Jt:J~ !q;~~ Lt:Jb-I"~-!b~~ U::'::'::'I-\ WI-\ ::'II-\Ie. "'1-\"'", t:J~ How wiJI these grant funds be utilized? Please list the other sources of financial support (sponsorship, etc.) which you have pursued: Source: . .8w:JJ~T~Q'" Committed: YES ~ Amount: $ . S-ð~fk:6£) ¡¿.. commj¡cc@ NO Amount: $ ~I'...,¡.. SIAff'DU" Committed: YES NO Amount: $ The \I11dersign.ed certify the. infonnation provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based on bìstory of sim:ilai evenis änd activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local COl1djriQÍ1s. Applicanfs Signatur~ ¿¿/ ~ Applicant's Ti~~."';t:' .. V~ç"......... ~ ~T d""",,7.C~ Date:~Y~ð.!l L 7....'-1 03/31/03 MON 16: 43 [TXlRX NO 9207] CO-ASSISTANT STATE DIRECTOR . Roger Wilson Days (206) 789-9133 Eves (206) 789-1359 ~SSS<1 TM USSSA WA. STATE P,O. Box 31089 Seattle, WA 98103-1089 (206) 789-9133 Fax: (206) 789-1659 United States Specialty Sports Association To whom it may concern Re: Economic Impact of softball to your community September 9, 2002 Another season has come and gone in the adult softball world, and the City of Federal Way has once again experienced the very best of the recreational and financial impact that the sport brings to a community. Adult softball is big business when it comes to the impact that it can and does have on any community. The amount of dollars generated within your community through adult softball is directly linked to how you as a city organization address the worth of adult participation within your complexes. By bringing large and prestigious post-season tournaments to your city, you have initiated the biggest step that can be taken towards these financial gains. League play brings to your community a certain economic impact; but tournament play is where the big money is at, for your city. The direct benefits are felt the most at local restaurants, bars and hotels; but the long term benefits will be felt throughout your community. The benefits of hosting post-season Championship play can have a very significant effect on the overall dollars spent within your community. It is my hope that the enclosed information will help enlighten those that are not aware of the impact softball has on your city, and will encourage everyone to recognize and support the value of the sport. Sincerely, ~ Co-Assistant State Director-Washington USSSA t,L-ç 2002 MENS "D" Nationals Hotel Information Held Aug 30-Sept 2 - Federal Way .8L3.O .B.L3..1.9.L1 uz I21aJ HOLIDA Y INN EXPRESS Automatic (San Jose, Ca.) Greg Haselhorst 6 6 6 18 Worth/Steel (Salem, Or.) Mikki Rice 6 6 6 li! Total 36 BEST WESTERN EXECUTEL Superior Door (Brentwood, Ca.) Dan Diaz 4 4 4 12 Destiny (Port Angeles, Wa.) John Pearce 1 1 2 Angels (Olympia, Wa.) Tony Ewing 1 1 2 Seven Cedars (Port Angeles, Wa.) Mike Steim 5 5 10 Team Gold (Roseville, Ca.) Jay letz 4 4 4 12 Regency Softball (Vallejo, Ca.) Vijay Patel 6 6 6 18 Frontier Excavating (Portland) Ray Dunkelberger 4 4 4 12 WSSUA, Wa. Dale McGregor 5 5 5 16 USSSA, Wa. Dave Nusser 1 1 1 --.3 Total 87 COMFORT INN Kino's (Grandview, Wa.) Dave Palomerez 4 4 4 12 A & C Chuggers (Bremerton, Wa.) Jim McNamara 1 2 3 Bay Mt. Air (Campbell, Ca.) Todd Stone 6 6 6 li! Total 33 COURTYARD MARRIOTT Sharkbait (Dayton, Or.) Matt Jacks 1 4 4 9 Magnum/Worth (Hayward, Ca.) Roger Cassie 2 2 2 6 Runnin' Daggs (Boise, Id.) Chris Crawford 4 4 4 12 Salem Concrete (Salem, Or.) Brian Frazier 3 3 3 9 Bow Wow Softball (Boise, Id.) Darryl Weiss 6 6 4 16 Total 52 TRAVELODGE - FEDERAL WAY Damage Inc. (Boise, Id) Ryan Bratt 6 6 6 li! Total 18 MISC MOTELS IN THE SOUTH END Hand Picked (Santa Rosa) Holiday Inn-Renton 3 3 3 9 AMF (Pt. Townsend, Wa.) Eastwind Motel 2 5 5 12 l-Dawgs (Nampa, Id.) SeaTac Marriote 5 5 5 15 TPS Bombers (Boise, 'd.) Extended Stay Am. 5 5 5 15 Gold's Gym (Boise, Id.) Quality Inn-FW 5 5 10 Barnone (Danville, Ca.) Best West./So. Ctr 5 5 5 15 2 Idaho Teams McChord AF Base 9 9 9 n Total 103 C '2Jo Page #2 Of the 32 teams that participated in this tournament from outside the immediate area we received questionnaires back from 29 of them. This gives us a total number of room nights of approximately 329. If we allow a 10% error rate in the numbers (for early check outs, etc.), we find that approximately 296 room nights were accounted for in connection with this event. If we apply these numbers to the formula that the National Visitors and Convention Bureaus use for figuring the economic impact of an event on their particular city you will find the following: National Visitors and Convention Bureaus Formula: Number of teams 67 Players, fans and coaches per team x --.2.'i 1675 Days of toumament ----1L3 5025 Daily average cost of meals, gas beverages, souvenirs, lodging, etc.. ...xB $376,875 Impact of outside dollars on local economy based on roll-over established by the International Ass. of Convention and Visitors Bureaus 2L3....S Economic Impact of Tournament $1,319,062 The foregoing information was based on the actual formula that is used throughout the country. However, I have supplied the following breakdown based on the room usage that was actually used over this weekend and what I feel is a more realistic view of what each visitor may have spent within the community. MEN'S USSSA "0" NATIONALS - AUG 30-SEPT 2, 2002 (FED WAY) A total of 67 teams participated in this event ( 40 teams from within Washington and 27 teams from outside of the state). From the above information that was supplied to us from the teams themselves and by adjusting the figures that are used in the formula I have deducted the following: With 67 teams entered into this event, approximately 1400 people were brought into the community for each of the three days of the event. C'LÎ Page #3 Number of people brought to the event ~ (# of days) 4200 Daily average cost of meals, gas beverages and souvenirs................ 1400 296 room nights times an average cost of $79.......... $30 x...42QQ $126,000 23 384 $149,384 Times the National Roll-over~ $522,844 The above figure is a very conservative estimate and does not include the additional revenue generated for the city through local sales tax and Motel taxes. These local taxes would more than likely amount to an additional revenue for the city of approximately $50,000. As you can see by the above examples, softball is big business regardless of what community is involved. We, in USSSA, appreciate what the city of Federal Way has done towards the development of adult slow pitch softball in the northwest, and we truly appreciate the support that the businesses have shown to this particular event. S;.w.ly, ~ Æ:f? Co-Assistant State Director - Washington USSSA CL~ CO-ASSISTANT STATE DIRECTOR Roger Wilson Days (206) 789-9133 Eves (206) 789-1359 <>sss«{ TM USSSA WA. STATE P.O. Box 31089 Seattle, WA98103-1089 (206) 789-9133 Fax: (206) 789-1659 United States Specialty Sports Association To whom it may concem Re: Economic Impact of softball to your community September 11, 2001 Adult softball is big business when it comes to the impact that it can and does have on any community. The amount of dollars generated within your community through adult softball is directly linked to how you as a city organization address the worth of adult participation within your complexes. By bringing large and prestigious post-season tournaments to your city, you have initiated the biggest step that can be taken towards these financial gains. League play brings to your community a certain economic impact; but tournament play is where the big money is at, for your city. The direct benefits are felt the most at local restaurants, bars and hotels; but the long tenn benefits will be felt throughout your community. The benefits of hosting post-season Championship play can have a very significant effect on the overall dollars spent within your community. It is my hope that the enclosed information will help enlighten those that are not aware of the impact softball has on your city, and will encourage everyone to recognize and support the value of the sport. Sincerely, Roger D. Wilson Co-Assistant State Director-Washington USSSA c?.~ Page #2 Of the 26 teams that participated in this tournament from outside the immediate area we received questionnaires back from all 26 of them. This gives us a total number of room nights of approximately 360. If we allow a 10% error rate in the numbers (for early check outs, etc.), we find that approximately 324 room nights were accounted for in connection with this event. If we apply these numbers to the formula that the National Visitors and Convention Bureaus use for figuring the economic impact of an event on their particular city you will find the following: National Visitors and Convention Bureaus Formula' Number of teams 46 Players, fans and coaches per team x ~ 1150 Days of toumament ~ 3450 Daily average cost of meals, gas beverages, souvenirs, lodging, etc.. ..x...li $25B,750 Impact of outside dollars on local economy based on roll-over established by the Intemational Ass. of Convention and Visitors Bureaus x...3....S. Economic Impact of Tournament $905,625 The foregoing information was based on the actual formula that is used throughout the country. However, I have supplied the following breakdown based on the room usage that was actually used over this weekend and what I feel is a more realistic view of what each visitor may have spent within the community. WOMEN'S USSSA "B/C/O" NATIONALS - AUG 31-SEPT 3.2001 (FED WAy) A total of 46 teams participated in this event ( 20 teams from within Washington and 26 teams from outside of the state). From the above information that was supplied to us from the teams themselves and by adjusting the figures that are used in the formula I have deducted the following: With 46 teams entered C-'7° Page #3 into this event, approximately 1000 people were brought into the community for each of the three days of the event. Number of people brought to the event ....lL...l (# of days) 3000 Daily average cost of meals, gas beverages and souvenirs................ 1000 $30 ~ $ 90,000 324 room nights times an average cost of $79.......... 25 596 $115,596 Times the National Roll-over lL....li $404,586 The above figure is a very conservative estimate and does not include the additional revenue generated for the city through local sales tax and Motel taxes. These local taxes would more than likely amount to an additional revenue for the city of approximately $38,000. As you can see by the above examples, softball is big business regardless of what community is involved. We, in USSSA, appreciate what the city of Federal Way has done towards the development of adult slow pitch softball in the northwest, and we truly appreciate the support that the businesses have shown to this particular event. Sincerely, Roger D. Wilson Co-Assistant State Director - Washington USSSA ~?\ ... W OMENS "a/c/O" Natiøaals Botellalonaatiøa BeM ADI ~.-se»t , . Federal Way .B.Lil Ul. !li.l.. Ul I21il HOLIDAY INN/LA OUINTA Maddness (La Mirada, Ca.) Russ Wells 4 4 4 12 Beaver Inn (Bellingham, Wa.) John O'Conner 5 5 5 15 Sharks (La Palma, Ca.) Joe Delafuente 6 6 6 18 Whatcam Merchants Laurrah Williams 3 3 -.§. Total 51 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Ringor (Portland, Or.) Jerry Liebertz 6 6 6 ll. Total 18 BEST WESTERN EXECUTEL Gary's Carpets (Caldwell, Id.) Gary Beougher 4 4 4 12 USSSA, Wa. Mark Lewis 1 1 1 J Total 15 COMFORT INN Chata (Sylmar, Ca.) Katrina Garcia 4 4 4 12 Deux Pah Dah (Sacramento, Ca.) Addrena Mauga 6 6 6 6 24 Extreme (Kennewick, Wa.) Karen Coulson 5 5 5 15 Fibromialgia (Bend, Or.) Marc Faulconer 8 8 8 24 Hafta Play (Laguna Hills, Ca.) Tisha Schafer 6 6 6 18 LTI (Bellingham, Wa.) Pam Harmon 3 3 3 9 Playaz (Portland, Or.) Toshi Brown 6 6 6 18 Terminal Freezer (Salem, Or.) Laura Hollenbeck 3 3 3 ....9. Total 129 COURTYARD MARRIOTT Christo's (Bellingham, Wa.). Cindy Koehn 4 4 - 4 12 Who's Yer Daddy (Vanc., Wa.) John Seekins 6 6 6 18 Bleckberry Dev. (Bell., Wa.) Sharon Munger 2 2 2 6 Posh Bagel (Sunnyside, Ca.) Sharron Zolezzi 5 5 5 15 Walmart (Centralia, Wa.) Rob Stackman 4 4 4 .lZ.. Total 63 TRAVELODGE - FEDERAL WAY Freemont Fury (Freemont, Ca.) Cheri/Jack Svenson 5 5 5 15 Storm (San Jose, Ca.) Mike Smith 8 8 8 il Total 39 MISC MOTELS IN THE SOUTH END Chain Reaction (San Ramon, Ca.) 3 3 3 9 Dream Team (Concord, Ca.) 5 5 5 15 No Doubt (Martinez, Ca.) 4 4 4 12 SNW Sistas (Hillsboro, Or.) 3 3 3 ....9. Total 45 C7¡<-- MEN'S PROGRAM DIRECTOR Roger Wilson Eves (2061 798-1359 USSSA WA. STATE P.O. Box 31089 Seattle, WA 98103-1089 (206) 789-9133 Fax: (206) 789-1659 'J,(H-dd Sta.t.u SLo.-PdcI.. S~ ¡:¡~Ú6H. " 2.000 ~NT" To whom it may concern Re: Economic Impact of softball to your community September 15, 2000 Adult softball is big business when it comes to the impact that it can and does have on any community. The amount of dollars generated within your community through adult softball is directly linked to how you as a city organization address the worth of adult participation within your complexes. By bringing large and prestigious post-season tournaments to your city, you have initiated the biggest step that can be taken towards these financial gains. League play brings to your community a certain economic impact; but tournament play is where the big money is at, for your city. The direct benefits are felt the most at local restaurants, bars and hotels; but the long term benefits will be felt throughout your community, The benefits of hosting post-season Championship play can have a very significant effect on the overall dollars spent within your community, It is my hope that the enclosed information will help enlighten those that are not aware of the impact softball has on your city, and will encourage everyone to recognize and support the value of the sport. Ro D. Wilson Co-Assistant State Director-Washington USSSA ~7) 2000 "H/C" Na1:ionals-Ro1:ellnforma1:ion Reid Sep1:ember I-4 - Federal Way Ul. uz. .an. ~ .I.!1.li! HOLIDAY INN RSC/ Johny E. (San Diego, Ca) Tony Sawyer 9 9 9 0 27 Designated Hitter (San Jose, Ca) Thomas Hom 6 6 6 6 24 Team Alpha/Nike (Grants Pass) Jeff Hunter 6 6 6 0 18 WSSUA Dale McGreger 3 3 3 1 .1.Q 79 HOLIDA Y INN EXPRESS Team Hara's (Salem, Or) Ron Black 4 4 4 0 12 Carsmart.Com (Danville, Ca) John Tortolini 6 6 6 0 ll. 78 BEST WESTERN EXECUTEl Cascade Telecom (Bend, Or) Russ Holiday 5 5 5 0 15 Capital Casino (Sacramento, Ca) Jay letz 3 4 4 4 .li 30 COMFORT INN Fowlers/EWM (Moses lake, Wa.) Charles Garcia 0 4 4 4 12 Cenco Rattlers (San Carlos, Ca) Darryl Clark 7 7 7 0 21 Sportsman/Cat Elect. (Concord, Ca.) Mike McCullen 5 5 5 5 20 Master Collision (Denver, Co.) Wil Wilmer 6 7 7 7 27 Worth/Smith (California) 5 5 5 5 ZQ 100 COURTYARD MARRIOTT Redwood Painting (Concord, Ca) Jim Higgins 7 7 7 0 21 Bully's (Reno, Nv.) Paul Sonner 8 8 8 0 il 45 TRAVElODGE - FEDERAL WAY Noble Softball (LA., Ca) Phillip Cobbs 5 5 5 0 15 Topline (Phoenix, Az.) Debbie Wilmoth 5 5 5 0 .li 30 c,~ Page #2 MOTEL 6 - FIFE .îil. Ul U1. .:!.ti I.!Wl.! Arizona Demarini (Phoenix, Az) Jim Henninger 10 10 10 0 30 III Street Records (Glendale, Az) John Delgado 1 7 7 0 15 A-1 Lite Trucking (Portland, Or) Adriann Miller 6 6 6 0 18 Team Worth/Mizuno (Ca.) Wayne Goodwin 9 9 9 0 n.. 80 MISC MOTELS IN THE SOUTH END Six Different Teams 40 40 40 0 120 Of the 31 teams that participated in this tournament from outside the immediate area we received questionnaires back from 26 of them. The average number of rooms booked for this weekend, figured from the above information, was 21 room-nights per team. If you multiply this number times the number of out-of-town teams that did not return the questionnaire, you will find that approximately 105 more rooms were booked for the weekend in question. This gives us a total number of room nights of approximately 677. If we allow a 20% error rate in the numbers (for early check outs, etc.), we find that approximately 542 room nights were accounted for in connection with this event. If we apply these numbers to the formula that the National Visitors and Convention Bureaus use for figuring the economic impact of an event on their particular city you will find the following: National Visitors and Convention Bureaus Formula' Number of teams 43 Players, fans and coaches per team x ~ 1075 Days of tournament -Ll. 3225 Daily average cost of meals, gas beverages, souvenirs, lodging, etc.. ..x..li $241,875 Impact of outside dollars on local economy based on roll-over established by the International Ass. of Convention and Visitors Bureaus ûá Economic Impact of Tournament $846,563 C35 Page #3 The foregoing information was based on the actual formula that is used throughout the country. However, I have supplied the following breakdown based on the room usage that was actually used over this. weekend and what I feel is a more realistic view of what each visitor may have spent within the community. MEN'S USSSA "D" NATIONALS - HELD SEPTEMBER 1-4 2000 (FEDERAL WAY) A total of 43 teams participated in this event ( 19 teams from within Washington and 26 teams from outside of the state). From the above information that was supplied to us from the teams themselves and by adjusting the figures that are used in the formula I have deducted the following: With 43 teams entered into this event, approximately 1000 people were brought into the community for each of the three days of the event. Number of people brought to the event ~ (# of days) 3000 Daily average cost of meals, gas beverages and souvenirs................ x.1QQQ 1000 $30 $ 90,000 542 room nights times an average cost of $79.......... 42818 $132,818 Times the National Roll-over L...1á $464,863 The above figure is a very conservative estimate and does not include the additional revenue generated for the city through local sales tax and Motel taxes. These local taxes would more than likely amount to an additional revenue for the city of approximately $40,000. As you can see by the above examples, softball is big business regardless of what community is involved. We, in USSSA, appreciate what the city of Federal Way has done towards the development of adult slow pitch softball in the northwest, and we truly appreciate the support that the businesses have shown to this particular event. Sincerely, Roger D. Wilson Co-Assistant State Director - Washington USSSA C3<O KING Aquatic Club/ Stephen 1. Freeborn - Secretary d r3 8 i{" KING Aquatic Club / - . '1L(f6ØJ '. J/l-<D t.U.. e - ;H) þ --- 6'Z'-{ )"15~ 7,> 66i oWO (w GRANT APPLICATION APPLICANT'S NAME: ORGANIZATION: KING Aquatic Club FEDERAL TAX ID: 91-1363268 IS A QUALIFIED SOIC CORPORATION: -- RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT [\tPARTMENT Yes STREET ADDRESS: MAR 3 12003 P.O. Box 25259 Federal Way, WA 98093 '.._"""~"""""". 29925 2nd Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 DAYTIME TELEPHONE: 253.503.1355 FAX: 253.941.6808 OFFICIAL EVENT NAME: 2003 U.S. Open Swimming Championship Briefly describe the eve8t (type of activity, male, female, cooed, etc.): The U.S. Open Swimming Championship is one of the prenùer events for U.S. Swimming. It is an international event (co-ed) that generally attracts 800-900 athletes (however. This year's attendance is expected to exceed 1200 athletes). In the past years this competition has had strong international representation fÌ'om Canada, Belgiwn, the Netherlands, France, Australia, and many Latin American countries. In 2001, more than 30 conntries participated in the event. The event is often used as a "tune-up" competition by many U.S. National Team members, as well as international athletes, in their preparation for the Olympic Games. Many national and world records have been established at the annual competition. In pre-Olympic years (i.e. 2003), the event is typically broadcast on national television, as it is the final major competition in the United States prior to the Olympic Trials. Seope of event: International Previous Hosts: Year 2002 2001 CityJState Minneapolis, MN Long Island, NY Venue Univ. of Minn. Aquatic Ctr. Nassau Goodwill Games Aquatic Center Has the event ever been held ita Federal Way? NO (,')1 Has the event ever been held in King County? NO Pierce County? NO This event has never been held in the state of Washington EVENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION Is a host fee required? No If so, what amount? OR % of proceeds What is the projected number of tickets that wiD be sold? Project about $10,000.00 - $15,000.00 Average Ticket Price: All Sessions: Adults/Students/Children $25.00 Includes heat sheet for all sessions Daily: Preliminaries: Adults/Students/Children $5.00 Daily: Finals: Adult s/ Stud ents/ Chil lIte n $7.00 Single Day Pass For Prelims and Finals: Adult s/ Stud ents/ C hil lIte n $10.00 Event's total estimated revenues? Gross about $50,000.00 Amount of expenses local host is responsible for? ~~1>-e !> Event's total estimated 7es? c'j 0 - 5-0í OO¿) What portion ofthe event's proceeds wiD be kept by the local host? 90% to host and 10% to King County 100% C3'Ï3 VENUE INFORMATION Proposed Local Venue: Weyerhaeuser King County Aquatic Center Location: Federal Way, Washington Proposed Dates: December 2, 2003 - December 6, 2003 Have you confirmed the availahility of the proposed dates at the primary venue? YES Will you have need for secondary or practice venues? NO ECONOMIC IMPACT $18,000.00 - 10% ofRet re'.~m¡e + WI. ..f (>t"ht See Attachment For Additional EconoDÙc Impact Statistics Total Venue Rental: How many participants will the event attract? 1000 - 1200 at1ùetes How many teams/groups will the event attract? Projected 500 How far away wiD the (athlete/participants) travel (local, regional, national, international)? This is an international event with athletes/teams/clubs participating ITom around the world. How many spectators wiD the event attract? especially for finals. Project capacity or near capacity, How far away will the spectators travel from? It is expected that the bulk of the spectators will come ITom the Puget Sound area; however, because this is an international event, with athletes ITom around the world, it is expected that a good percentage of the spectators will be ITomput of the area and, therefore, requiring accommodations. How many support (staff, vendors, etc) people wiD the event attract? Timers, judges, officials, volunteers, vendors, children/participants for opening ceremolÙes and awards, medical personnel, drug testing personneL security C"71 Of the numbers listed above, what percentage wiD require overnight lodging? Participants 95% Team/Groups 95% Spectators 50% Event Staff 75% GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED: $20,000.00 How will the grant funds be utilized? To finance meet promotion and operations and to aid in covering expenses incurred. Please list other sources of financial support which you have pursued: Source: USA Swimming Committed $15,000.00 Amount Committed Amount Committed Amount Committed Amount The undersigned certify the information provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based on istory of similar events and activities that are available to the industry- an djusted 0 10 I conditions. Applicant's Signature Applicant's Title: S{~ rll--w';J , JC,..., lr ~"" iT/; Date: 3 - 30 -".3 ~ I.. b 0,-/0 Economic Impact Attendance reports from meet hosts of the Phillips 66 Nationals, U.S. Open, and Olympic Trials Competitions were used to compile the following statistics. Expenses should be adjusted for your locale. Participant Attendance Swimmers. Coaches Officials 1999 Spring Nationals 1999 Summer Nationals 1999 U.S. Open 855 1593 1135 270 580 345 120 110 105 2000 Spring Nationals 2000 Olympic Trials 2000 U.S. Open 951 1306 637 359 400 204 107 175 72 2001 Spring Nationals 2001 Summer Nationals 2001 u.S. Open 751 953 1165 275 277 266 80 105 85 AVERAGE 1037 330 106 Club Attendance 1999 Spring Nationals 1999 Summer Nationals 1999 US Open 240 330 245 2000 Spring Nationals 2000 Olympic Trials 2000 U.S. Open 276 380 195 2001 Spring Nationals 2001 Summer Nationals 2001 U.S. Open 254 287 304 AVERAGE 279 ~ . - 5- C<.fl Hotel Revenues To determine the average amount spent at these meets for accommodations we use the following fonnula: Swimmers(1037) + Coaches(330) + Officials(1O6) + average # of people per room(2.5) x length of meet in days(5) x average cost perroom($90) = total hotel income ($265,140) Rental Car Revenue It is important to consider the income ITom rental cars also. Prices will vary according to area and type of car. The average daily rate for a rental car/van. is $55. Indications are that most clubs rent one van or two cars. Based on these assumptions this is the formula car rental income for a 6 day meet: # c1ubs(279) x # ofcars(I.5) x dai1yrate($55) x # days(5) = total rental car income($115,088) FoodIMisceUaneous Revenue People attending the meet will also be purchasing meals, souvenirs and miscellaneous items. Using as an average 1037 athletes, 330 coaches and 95 additional personnel spending $45 per day, the additional impact would reflect as follows: 1,367 people x $45/day x 5 days = $3(17,575 Summary: 1,473 athletes/coaches/officials $265,140 $115,088 $307.575 $687,803 Hotels Rental Cars Food!Misc. Total These figures exclude any airport tax or landing fees paid to the site, city, or special events coordinated with amusement or water slide parks, etc. Based on the assumption that .5 support people will travel with each athlete (parents, chaperons), consequently an additional impact of $209,993 can be determined ITom the formulas used above. (Hotels - $93,330; Food/Misc. - $116,663) - 6- CLtL , , - , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , þ , , , . . . þ þ Advertising Exposure (programiSignage) Determine your "cost per impression" by multiplying the number of attendees (including spectators) times the number of sessions. Example: 1,600 attendees x 9 sessions = 14,400 impressions. *Check with your local convention or tourism cowcil to determine the amount of money spent by out of town guests. Also find out how many times that money changes hands in the community. Figures may be 5-7 times. The figures are belpful when dealing with city fathers, sponsors, hotels and advertisers. Financial Opportunities for Hosts . USA Swimming works with the local organizing committee (LOC) on all aspects of the competition. . The LOC has opportunities to generate revenue from the event from areas such as: . ticket sales . advertisement sales . entry fees . local sponsorships . concessions . USA Swimming shall retain signage, merchandise and entitlement rights in all venues where its competitions are held. Any potential conflicts MUST be noted on event applications. Profit Information from Past Meets 2001 2000 1999 1998 Spring Nationals $4,776 $20,029 $10,518 $20,226 Summer NationaIslTrials* $32,034 $226,540* $43,332 $49,907 U.S. Open NA $7,000 $22,229 $18,250 Zone - West NA NA $10,860 NA Zone - East $3579 $3,048 $12,591 $9,238 Zone - South $16,954 $8,348 $12,621 $4,954 Zone - Central (I) ($6,982) $15,191 $11,357 $1,891 Zone - Central (2) $17,752 $16,257 $670 $17,164 Speedo Champions Series Spring Average NA Summer Average $7,419 ~ . - 7- Cy) GRANT APPLICA nON GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS: Read the entire packet, including the attached selection criteria before completing this application. Please type or print. Answer each question to the best of your ability. The BOARD does not provide funding for tournament entry fees, travel, lodging, meals, unifonns, equipment, coaches salaries, facility upgrades or capital campaigns. If a question is not applicable to your event, simply write "N/ A" in the space provided. You may mail or deliver your completed application to the address listed below, Attn: Patrick Doherty, TEG Application City of Federal Way P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 . joé RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVEI.(1PMF~T [lFPARTMENT MAR 3 1 2003 APPLICANT'S NAME: Brad Moeller. Executive Director ORGANIZATION: Tacoma-Pierce County Sports Commission Amateur Athletic Fund FEDERAL TAX ID: 94-3160367 IS A QUALIFIED 501@ ORGANIZATION 50!(c)(3) STREET ADDRESS: 1119 Pacific Ave. 5th Floor. Tacoma. WA 98402 DAYTIME Telephone:(253) 284-3260 Fax: (253) 627-8783 Official Event Name: WlAA Gridiron Classic (High School State Football Championships) Briefly describe the event (type of activity, male, female, co-ed, etc): The WIAA Gridiron Classic is the Washington State High School Football Championships. This years event will take place at the Tacoma Dome on December 5-6. 2003. Annuallv. the Gridiron Classic attracts an estimated 30.000 visitors to our region, Conservative estimates place visitor spending in excess of $2.500.000. This event was attracted and serviced through the Tacoma-Pierce County Sports Commission Amateur Athletic Fund. Scope of Event (check I): Local X State Regional National International (j-/5 Previous Hosts: YEAR CITY/STATE King Dome 1977 - 1994 Tacoma Dome 1995 - Present Venue Has this event ever been held in Federal Way? No Has this event ever been held in King County? Yes Pierce County? Yes If yes, when: See above Month: Year: Venue: City: EVENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION Is a host fee required? Yes 1994-99 If so, what amount? $75.000 or % of proceeds What is the projected number of tickets that will be sold? 30.000 Average ticket price: $ 8.00 Event's total estimated expenses: $ 200.000 Amount of expenses local host is responsible for? $ 0 Events total estimated revenues?$ 250.000 What portion of the event's proceeds will be kept by the local host? $ 0 C ~l \" VENUE INFORMATION Proposed local venue: Tacoma Dome Location: Tacoma. Washington Proposed dates: December 5-6. 2003 Have you confirmed the availability of the proposed dates at the primary venue? YES Will you have a need for secondary or practice venues? NO TOTAL VENUE RENTAL (both competition and practice sites) $ 30.000 ECONOMIC IMPACT How many participants will the event attract? 300 How many teams/groups will the event attract? 10 teams. with cheerleaders. coaches. bands How far away will the (athlete/participants) travel (local, regional, national, international)?State-wide How many spectators will the event attract? 30.000 How far away will spectators travel from? State-wide How many support (staff, vendor, etc) people will the event attract? 125 Of the numbers listed above, what percentage will require overnight lodging? Partipants Spectators 90 % 70 % Teams/Groups_90 % Event Staff 50 % I GRANT AMOUNT REQUESTED: $ 5,000 CL/ì How will these grant funds be utilized? Over the course of the past 8 years, $75,000 has been used for facility costs associated with the WIAA Gridiron Classic. Facility costs are concrete, while local companies that value the events importance typically donate other event services. Subsequently, this fund has also given over $5,000 to events in the King County Aquatic Center since 1998. Please list the other sources of financial support (sponsorship, etc,) which you have pursued: Source: Ricoh Business Svstems Committed: YES NO Amount: $ In-kind Sheraton Tacoma Committed: YES NO Amount: $ In-kind LaclUinta Inn Committed: YES NO Amount: $ In-kind The undersigned certify the infonnation provided above is true and accurate and any projections are based on history of similar events and activities that are available to the industry and adjusted to local conditions, Applicant's Signature~¿ Applicant's Title: exec: (¿;f1/1tC Ì)¡JØB:-~ Date: /5 131 h3 I G'f~) MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# VT~J CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: SELECTION OF VOTING DELEGATES FOR 2003 A WC ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: D CONSENT D RESOLUTION ~ CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS D ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contingency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: None SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Association of Washington Cities (A We) has asked Council to select up to three city officials and/or city staff who will serve as voting delegates to represent the city at the 2003 A WC annual business meeting. Following the selection, the City Clerk is directed to advise A WC of the voting delegates. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a PROPOSED MOTION: "( move approval of _(delegate names) delegates at the 2003 A WC annual business meeting." CITY MANAGER APPROV AL:~u to serve as the city's voting (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1ST reading Enactment reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # REVISED - OS/1 0/2001 MEETING DATE: May 6, 2003 ITEM# YiT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA BILL SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE (FWCC) CHAPTER 22, ARTICLE XIX - DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEFINITION OF HEIGHT CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: D CONSENT D RESOLUTION D CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS [8: ORDINANCE D PUBLIC HEARING D OTHER Amount Budgeted: Expenditure Amt.: Contiugency Req'd: $ $ $ ATTACHMENTS: 1) Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit A. 2) April 14, 2003, Memorandum to the Land Use Transportation Committee (LUTC) (Please note that Exhibits 1-6 of this memorandum is on file with the Clerk's Office). SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Du¡:¡niiiheCi¡Y coïïn;;iÏ .public;;;eeiiiïii of Yïïiy iZ,200Z, the Coïïn;;¡idi~e;;iedsiàffio.... prepare amendments to Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines," pertaining to maximum façade length and roof pitch for institutional uses and maximum height for religious institutions. As a result, these code amendments were added to the Planning Commission Work Program. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 5, and March 19, 2003 and recommended that the council adopt the code amendments, as recommended by staff and amended by the Planning Commission. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The LUTC discussed the proposed text amendments during a public meeting on April 21, 2003. At that meeting, the LUTC recommended forwarding the amendments as proposed by the Planning Commission and amended by the LUTC (Exhibit A) to the full Council for first reading on May 6, 2003. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move approval of the LUTC's recommendation to approve the code amendments, which are attached as Exhibit A to the Adoption Ordinance." CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: .~........ .................-.......... (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERKS OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION D MOVED TO SECOND READING (ordinances only) COUNCIL BILL # 1 ST READING ENACTMENT READING ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # 3~-z K:ICD PlanninglDesign Guidelines & Definition of HeightlCity Councill050603 AGENDA BILLDOC/04/30/2003 10:40 AM CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA TION April ]4,2003 FROM: Eric Faison, Chair Land Userrransportation Committee (LUTe) David MO~nager Kathy McClung: Director of Community Development Services ~ Margaret H. CI~~P, Senior Planner~ Lori MichaeIs~Iyt', Senior Planner To: VIA: SUBJECT: Amendments to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article XIX - Design Guidelines and Definition of Height (File #03-100842-00-UP) MEETING DATE: April 2],2003 I. BACKGROUND During the City Council public meeting of July 12, 2002, the Council directed staff to prepare amendments to Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines," pertaining to maximum façade length and roof pitch for institutional uses in residential zones and maximum height for religious institutions in residential zones, As a result, these code amendments were added to the Planning Commission Work Program, 11. REASON FOR THE CODE AMENDMENTS The Community Design Guidelines were initially adopted in 1996, at which time they applied only to commercial, office, and industrial development uses in non-residential zones, They were later amended in 1999 to apply to all non-single family uses in any zone. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) regulations were adopted in 2000. These regulations pertain to all non-single family development. The purpose of the guidelines relating to roof pitch and façade was to control the visual impacts associated with large institutional uses, However, recent review of large institutional buildings such as schools and churches has identified that they are having difficulty meeting existing provisions relating to façade length, modulation, and roof pitch in any zone. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-], "Definitions," institutional uses are defined as schools, churches, colleges, hospitals, parks, government facilities, and public utilities. Staff has also found that the maximum allowable height in the code does not allow sufficient height for sanctuaries with high ceilings, multiple level seating, or religious symbols that project above the rooftop. We have also received variance requests from churches relating to height; St. Vincent in 1995 and Christ Church in 2003. The City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner approved both of these variance requests. Rather than continuing to review individual variance requests, staff is recommending alternative design options for institutional uses to provide more flexibility in façade treatment, building modulation, and roof design, and increased building height for churches in all residential zones and the Community Business zone. III. PLANNING COMMISSION/STAFF RECOMMENDA nON The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on March 5, and March 19, 2003, and recommended that the code amendments, as recommended by staff and modified by the Planning Commission, be adopted by the council (Exhibit 1 - Code Amendments as Recommended by the Planning Commission and Exhibit 2- March 19,2003, Planning Commission Minutes). The staff reports to the Planning Commission are attached as Exhibits 3,4, and 5 of this memorandum. The staff recommended changes are shown as ~ underline (additions). Additional changes by the Planning Commission are shown as sItaèeà (deletions) and 5hád~tl;aÎ1dÜÎ1diŒline (additions). IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The proposed code amendments are summarized as follows: 1. Amendments to FWCC Section 22-1. Definitions of Average Building Elevation and Height As shown on Page I of Exhibit 1, changes are being recommended to the definition of "height" in order to clarify how height is being measured. This is simply a housekeeping amendment and neither the methodology nor the resulting maximum allowable height will be affected as a result of the clarification. A slightly lower height limit for single-family residential structures is also being proposed where the total roof area of dormers exceeds 35 percent of the total area of the underlying sloped roof. Excessive use of dormers on very large houses is becoming a trend and may pose a problem in the future in terms of blocking views especially along the shoreline. 2. Amendments to FWCC Section 22-1632. Applicability As shown on Page 3 of Exhibit 1, this section is proposed to be amended to state that the Community Design Guidelines apply to all development applications except single-family residential. The existing code language was written to protect the vesting of applications submitted prior to adoption of the different code amendments affecting this section and due to the passage of time since the amendments were adopted, is no longer necessary. 3. Amendments to FWCC Section 22-1635(b) Relating to Façade Treatment and Building Articulation FWCC Section 22-1635(b) requires that all building facades that are both longer than 60 feet and visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone incorporate certain facade treatment. In addition, FWCC Section 22-1 638(a)(I 5) requires that the longest dimension of any non-single family building façade in any zone not exceed 120 feet. The latter requirement is not practical for large institutional buildings. As a result, staff has interpreted this to mean that no single plane of any building façade can exceed 120 feet in length without a significant structural modulation (i.e. building offset) every 120 feet. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 2 However, staff has little code-based direction, beyond the administrative interpretation, as to what constitutes a "significant structural modulation." Additionally, the current code does not provide alternative treatments for these longer facades that may be equal to or more effective than modulation, Given this lack of existing code direction and design flexibility, it is recommended that the modulation standard be clarified and that additional design options be considered that will effectively break up and soften the appearance of long, institutional facades. In order to accomplish this a new section, FWCC Section 22-1639, is proposed to be added to address institutional uses in any zone where they are permitted. The proposed amendment gives both prescriptive direction on how the major structural modification should be accomplished as well as performance based options for alternative methods to accomplish the design (see pages 16 and 17 of Exhibit 1). 4. Roof Pitch Pursuant to FWCC Chapter 22, Section 22-1638(a)(l3) of the Community Design Guidelines, all new non-single-family residential uses, including accessory buildings such as carports and garages, shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4: 12 to a maximum of 12: 12. The Use Zone Charts regulate heights of buildings. While building height and roof design are important factors in regulating the bulk and scale of a building, the current regulations, when taken together, are inflexible and problematic for larger institutional buildings, like churches and schools, These types of facilities often need greater height for elements like sanctuaries, multi-level seating, and choir mezzanines; thereby, making it difficult to also accommodate a roof pitch without exceeding height limits. In some instances, the roof pitch requirement actually adds to the mass of the structure, which could have negative effects on surrounding residential properties or the residential character of the area. The code amendment proposes to delete the roof pitch requirements for institutional uses and replace it with the performance-based language (Section 22-1639[4], see Pages 16 and 17 of Exhibit 1). 5. Modification of Use Zone Charts The following special regulation currently applies to many uses in residential areas: If any portion of a structure on the subject property is within 100 fret of a low-densitY zone, then either: a) The height of that structure shall not exceed IS feet above average building elevation; or b) The façade of that portion of the structure parallel to the low-density zone shall not exceed 50 feet in length. As part of the 2002 code amendments, the definition of low-densitY zone was modified for consistency with the comprehensive plan to mean only the Suburban Estates (SE) wne, which requires a minimum lot size of five acres. Previously, the low-density zone definition referred to all single-family residential zoning districts (SE, RS 35.0, RS 15.0, RS 9.6, and RS 7.2) except for the RS 5.0 wne (one unit per 5,000 square feet). With the 2002 code amendment, only uses within 100 fret of the SE zone would now be subject to this special regulation. In addition, there is already the requirement under FWCC Chapter Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #O3-100842-00-UP Page 3 22, Section 22-1635(b) of the Community Design Guidelines that requires special architectural treatment of facades over 60 feet in length. Consequently, there appears to be some duplication between these two requirements. The recommendation is therefore to delete the special regulation as described above in the Use Zone Charts for churches in residential zones (refer to page 19 of Exhibit J - SE Use Zone Chart, for an example of this language). 6. Maximum Height As mentioned earlier in this memorandum, a number of churches have asked for height variances for sanctuaries with high ceilings, multi-level seating, raised pulpits or platforms for the preacher or pastor, and a steeple or religious symbol. The maximum height for churches in zones where they are allowed are as follows: Zone Chnrch SE 35 ft RS 30 ft RM 3.6 &2.4 30 ft RM 1.8 35 ft BC 35 ft CC-C 35 ft CC-F 35 ft There is already a provision to allow increased height for churches in the CommunitY Business (BC), City Center Core (CC-C), and City Center Frame (CC-F) zones if approved through a Process III review. There is no maximum upper limit for the CC-C and CC-F zones and a maximum of up to 55 feet for the BC zone. Therefore, the height provisions for churches are recommended to be modified as follows: (a) For Suburban Estates (SE - one unit per five acres), Single Family Residential (RS), and Multiple Family Residential (RM) zones, allow an increase to 55 feet for sanctuaries if an additional one-foot setback beyond the required setback is provided for every one additional foot in height above the base height allowed. For all other portions of the building, allow an increase to 40 feet if an additional one-foot setback is provided for everyone-foot in additional height, and the additional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use to be conducted in the building. Staff had recommended to the Planning Commission that the footprint of that portion of the sanctuary exceeding 40 feet in height not exceed 50 percent of the total area of the building footprint of the portion of the church use on the subject propertv, Upon further analvsis. staff is recommending that this provision be deleted as it mav actuallv penalize smaller churches where the maioritvofthe building is proposed for a sanctuarv. (b) For Suburban Estates (SE), Single Family Residential (RS), Multiple Family Residential (RM), and Community Business (BC) zones, religious symbols for churches and other religious institutions may exceed the highest point ofthe underlying roof on which it is mounted by an additional 15 feet, provided that such symbol is a minor architectural accent and only one such symbol is permitted on the principal structure for this use (refer to page 19 of Exhibit J - SE Use Zone Chart, for an example of this language). (c) The proposed amendments to the design guidelines will provide design flexibilitY for rooflines as an alternative to pitched roofs as discussed in Section IV (4) above. Two-story churches have a Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 4 typical floor-to-ceiling height of 28 to 29 feet. It is therefore recommended that architectural extensions of flat rooflines, such as parapets and articulated cornices, be allowed to exceed the height limit by three feet when the base height is 30 feet; rooflines above 30 feet would not require the exception to accommodate the additional elements, This will allow and encourage added architectural elements to two-story buildings instead of forcing designers to drop the underlying ceiling height below 30 feet to accommodate such roofline aesthetics, The three-foot exception is recommended since it is 10 percent of the 30-foot base height. Language has been inserted in the RS and RM Use Zone Charts which both have base heights of 30 feet to address this (refer to page 20 of Exhibit 1 - RS Use Zone Chart, for an example of this language). 7. Proposed Miscellaneous Changes to Article XIX. Community Design Guidelines (a) FWCC Section 22-1635. Building Design, All Zoning Districts - The following additional criterion is proposed to articulate blank walls (see page I I of Exhibit 1): (c) (2) b. Window openings with visible trim material. or painted detailing that resembles !!:i!!!; (b) FWCC Section 22-1636. Building and Pedestrian Orientation, All Zoning Districts - The statement "(does not apply to residential zones)" is proposed to be deleted because non-residential uses such as churches and schools are allowed in residential zones and should also be governed by this section (see page 12 of Exhibit 1). (c) FWCC Section 22-1638. District Guidelines - Section 22-1638(9) is proposed to be amended as follows (see page 13 of Exhibit 1): Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums and other comparable large institutional uses. The maximum height for large institutional uses shall be 30 feet and shall include cutoff shields. This change is being proposed because the height of the lighting structure is related to the amount of illumination coverage. Similar to public parks and school stadiums, other large institutional sites would have to provide more 20-foot taillight fixtures than 30-foot tall fixtures to safely illuminate the site, Requiring shorter structures would add substantially to the cost of lighting for larger sites. In addition, the taller structures would not be out of scale with larger facilities. The provision for 20-foot fixtures is, therefore, not proposed for larger institutional uses, However, there would still be the flexibility to require 20-foot tall structures for smaller institutional sites. (d) New FWCC Section 22-1639. Institutional Use - Section 22-1639(6) is being proposed to allow modifications to the parking lot landscaping requirements of FWCC Section 22-1 638(a)(7) (see page 17 of Exhibit 1). The reason for this proposed amendment is to encourage retention of existing natural features and systems on large mostly undeveloped sites, which is also consistent with low- impact development techniques being considered by the City. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation to LUTC File #O3-IOO842-00-UP Page 5 v. COUNCIL ACTION/STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Committee has the following options: I. Recommend that the full Council adopt an ordinance approving the proposed code amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. æ Recommend that the full Council modify and then approve the proposed code amendments, 3. Recommend that the full Council disapprove the proposed code amendments. Staff recommends that the Committee recommend to the full Council Option No.2 above, that is, adoption of the Planning Commission's recommendations with the further clarification changes recommended by staff as described in Section N (6)(a) (shown as underlined). VI. LAND UsEffRANSPORT A TION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The LUTC forwards the proposed amendment to the full Council for first reading as follows: ~ As recommended by Planning Commission. As recommended by Planning Commission and amended by the LUTC, ApPROVAL OF COMMITTEE ACTION: ~/l~ c aiso! (bhair) A~~/L /' Mike Park . ..-/ '-....... LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit I Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Planning Commission Recommendation March 19,2003, Planning Commission Minutes Staff Report for the March 5, 2003, Planning Commission Public Hearing Staff Report for the March 19,2003, Planning Commission Public Hearing (Continued) Follow-up Materials for the March 19,2003, Planning Commission Public Hearing (Continued) Ordinance Adopting Code Amendments K:ICD PlanninlÌlDesign Guidelines & Definitioo ofHeightlUITCIPC Rec StalTReport to LUTC.DOC/041151200J II: II AM Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Planning Commission Recommendation tò LUTC File #O3-IOO842-O0-UP Page 6 ORDINANCE NO. 03 - OR~f1 ~/& 1/~J CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING FEDERAL WAY CHAPTER 22 (ZONING), ARTICLE XIX OF THE CITY CODE -DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEFINITION OF HEIGHT WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way adopted Ordinance No. 96-270 in July 1996, which significantly revised the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22 (Zoning); WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that the amendments to FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) relating to maximum façade length, modulation, roof pitch, and other miscellaneous standards for institutional uses, and height for churches will provide for more flexibility and improved design options for institutional buildings; WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way finds that these code amendments will implement and are consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on these code amendments on March 5, and March 19, 2003, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council; WHEREAS, the Land Use Transportation Committee of the Federal Way City Council considered these code amendments on April 21, 2003, following which it recommended adoption of the text amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the code amendments relating to maximum façade length, modulation, roof pitch, and other miscellaneous standards for institutional uses, and height for churches are consistent with the intent and purpose of FWCC Chapter 22 (Zoning) to provide for and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. Ord No. 03- , Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way finds that the proposed code amendments will protect and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. Section 2, Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-528, and based upon the Findings set forth in Section I, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the proposal: 1. The proposed FWCC text amendments are consistent with, and substantially implement, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUG] Improve the appearance andfunction of the built environment, LUP6 Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the development review process. LUG3 Preserve and protect Federal Way's single-family neighborhoods. LUPl5 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. 2. The proposed amendments bear a substantial relationship to public health, safety, or welfare because they will result in more aesthetically pleasing institutional buildings throughout the City, while ensuring compatibility with adjacent residential areas. and 3. The proposed amendments are in the best interest of the residents of the City because they will supplement existing development standards and clarifY various code sections, Clarification of City codes is in the best interests of the residents of the City. Section 3, Amendment. FWCC Chapter 22 is amended as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Section 4. Severability, The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable, The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to any other persons or circumstances. OrdNo. 03- ,Page 2 Section 5, Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affinned. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of ,2003. ApPROVED: MAYOR, JEANNE BURBIDGE ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N, CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC ApPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, PATRICIA A. RICHARDSON FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE No: K:\CD Planning\Design Guidelines & Definition ofHeightlLUTClAdoption Ordinance.docl04/2812003 5:09 PM Ord No. 03 - , Page3 EXHIBIT A FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE Chapter 22, "Zoning" 22-1 Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Average building elevation (A.BE) means a reference datum on lh~ >ulfa~~ luvugwVhy uf a subject property from which building height is measured. Th~ l~f~l~ll~~ datulll >hall b~ a VUilltllU high~l lhall fiv~ f~~l ábuv~ lh~ luw~>t d~valiull lak~ll al allY ~Xkliul wall uf lh~ >llU~lul~ ~ilh~l VIÍUI lu any d~vduVlll~ul aclivily Ul at filli>h~d glad~, whidl~V~1 i> luw~l, vlUvid~d lh~ l~f~l~ll~~ dalulll i> ~4uallu Ul luw~l lhall tlœ high~>l ~kvaliull al allY ~Xkliul wall ufth~ >llUclUl~ Vliu, lu d~vduVlll~lll aclivily. A RF i. thp gvprggp nf the highest and lowest existing or proposed elevations, whirhpvpr i. Inwpd, tglzpn gt thp ho.p ofthe pyfp,.;nrwgll. nfthp drnrtnrp; prnvirlp,1 thgt A RF .holl nnt hp grpotpr thon fivp fppt ohovp the lowest existing nr prnpn.prl plevation Allowed :---nn-- Building: Height: , , , , , , , , , , , , _----un, , , , , , , , , , , un_' Lowest Elevation Reference datum (ABE) Highest Elevation Height of structure means the vertical distance above the average building elevation measured to the highest point of lhe coping uf a flat roof or to the deck line of a mansard roof, or to the av~wg~ h~ighl uf th~ high~>t gabI~ uf a Vikh~d Ul hivv~d lUuf mirl-pnint hptwpe" eave and ri<;Jge of the highpd prinripol rnnfnfg goble, hip, gomhrpl, nr .imilgr .lope<;J roof FQr ~inglp-fomily rp.irlpntöol drnrtnrp. whprp thp tnt~1 rQof orpo nf rlnrmpr< PYrpprl~ 35 per~ent ofthp tntol orpo nf thp lIurlprlying .Inpprl rnQf, "eight will hp mpo.nrprl tn the ri-:Jge oftbe "ighpd prinripol gohlp. Article XIX. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES Sections: 22-1630 Purpose. 22-1631 Administration. 22-1632 Applicability. 22-1633 Definitions. 22-1634 Site design - All zoning districts. 22-1635 Building design - All zoning districts. 22-1636 Building and pedestrian orientation - All zoning districts. 22-1637 Mixed-use residential buildings in commercial zoning districts. 22-1638 District guidelines. 22-1639 Design criteria for public on-site open space. 22-1640 Design for cluster residential subdivision lots. 22-1641- 22-1650 Reserved. 22-1630 Purpose. The purpose of this article is to: (I) Implement community design guidelines by: a. Adopting design guidelines in accordance with land use and development policies established in the Federal Way comprehensive plan and in accordance with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Guidelines. b. Requiring minimum standards for design review to maintain and protect property values and enhance the general appearance of the city. c. Increasing flexibility and encouraging creativity in building and site design, while assuring quality development pursuant to the comprehensive plan and the purpose of this article. d. Achieving predictability in design review, balanced with administrative flexibility to consider the individual merits of proposals. e. Improving and expanding pedestrian circulation, public open space, and pedestrian amenities in the city. (2) Implement Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles by: a, Requiring minimum standards for design review to reduce the rate of crime associated with persons and property, thus providing for the highest standards of public safety, b. CPTED design principles are functionally grouped into the following three categories: I. Natural Surveillance. This focuses on strategies to design the built environment in a manner that promotes visibility of public spaces and areas, 2, Access Control. This category focuses on the techniques that prevent and/or deter unauthorized and/or inappropriate access. 3, Ownership. This category focuses on strategies to reduce the perception of areas as "ownerless" and, therefore, available for undesirable uses. c, CPTED principles, design guidelines, and performance standards will be used during project development review to identify and incorporate design features that reduce opportunities for criminal activity to occur. The effectiveness of CPTED is based on the fact that criminals make rational choices about their targets, In general: I, The greater the risk of being seen, challenged, or caught; the less likely they are to commit a crime. 2. The greater the effort required, the less likely they are to commit a crime. 3, The lesser the actual or perceived rewards, the less likely they are to commit a crime. d. Through the use of CPT ED principles, the built environment can be designed and managed to ensure: Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A iÞ2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-] 00842-00-UP Page 2 I. There is more chance of being seen, challenged, or caught; 2. Greater effort is required; 3, The actual or perceived rewards are less; and 4, Opportunities for criminal activity are minimized, (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99- 333, § 3, I-I9-99;Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1631 Administration. Applications subject to community design guidelines and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) shall be processed as a component of the governing land use process, and the director of community development services shall have the authority to approve, modifY, or deny proposals under that process, Decisions under this article will consider proposals on the basis of individual merit and will encourage creative design alternatives in order to achieve the stated purpose and objectives of this article. Decisions under this article are appealable using the appeal procedures of the applicable land use process, (Ord, No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3,4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16- 01) 22-1632 Applicability. This article shall apply to all cemmerGial, effice, and industrial development applications, in cemmercial ænes except sinl!le-familv residential. subject to FWCC 22, Zoning" and which were submitted for r-e','iew after July I, 1996, and shall apply to any non single family residential de'/elepment applicatien in any zene, which "'as submitted after January 25, 1999. CPTED guidelines and performanee standards shall also "I'pIy to all pre'/iously described applications abeye, inGiuding cemmunity facilities anà public parks submitted after January 21, 2QQQ. CPTED guidelines anà perfermance standards shall not apply te prEJ:iects that haye receiveà preapplication revie'v prior te the effecti"e date ef the amendments. Project proponents shall demonstrate how each CPTED design principle is met by the proposal, or why it is not relevant by either a written explanation or by responding to a checklist prepared by the city, Subject applications for remodeling or expansion of existing developments shall meet only those provisions of this article that are detennined by the director to be reasonably related and applicable to the area of expansion or remodeling. This article in no way should be construed to supersede or modifY any other city codes, ordinances, or policies that apply to the proposal. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3,4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, §3, l-I9-99;Ord. No.OI-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1633 Definitions. (1) Active usee s) means uses that by their very nature generate activity, and thus opportunities for natural surveillance, such as picnic areas, extracurricular school activities, exercise groups, etc. (2) Arcade means a linear pedestrian walkway that abuts and runs along the facade ofa building. It is covered, but not enclosed, and open at all times to public use, Typically, it has a line of columns along its open side. There may be habitable space above the arcade. (3) Awning means a roof-like cover that is temporary or portable in nature and that projects from the wall of a building for the purpose of shielding a doorway or window trom the elements. (4) Canopy means a pennanent, cantilevered extension of a building that typically projects over a pedestrian walkway abutting and running along the facade of a building, with no habitable space above the canopy, A canopy roof is comprised of rigid materials, (5) Common/open space area means area within a development, which is used primarily by the occupants ofthat development, such as an entryway, lobby, courtyard, outside dining areas, etc, (6) Natural surveillance means easy observation of buildings, spaces, and activities by people passing or living/working/recreating nearby, (7) Parking structure means a building or structure consisting of more than one level, above and/or below ground, and used for temporary storage of motor vehicles. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A (Çj2002 Code Publishing Co. File #O3-IOO842-00-UP Page 3 (8) Plaza means a pedestrian space that is available for public use and is situated near a main entrance to a building or is clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way. Typical features include special paving, landscaping, lighting, seating areas, water features, and art. (9) Public on-site open space means a space that is accessible to the public at all times, predominantly open above, and designed specifically for use by the general public as opposed to serving merely as a setting for the building. (10) Right-of-way means land owned, dedicated or conveyed to the public, used primarily for the movement of vehicles, wheelchair and pedestrian traffic, and land privately owned, used primarily for the movement of vehicles, wheelchair and pedestrian traffic; so long as such privately owned land has been constructed in compliance with all applicable laws and standards for a public right-of-way. (11) Sight line means the line of vision from a person to a place or building, (12) Streetscape means a term in urban design that defines and describes the character and quality of a street by the amount and type of features and furnishings abutting it. Such features and furnishings may include trees and other landscaping, benches, lighting, trash receptacles, bollards, curbing, walls, different paving types, signage, kiosks, trellises, art objects, bus stops, and typical utility equipment and appurtenances. (13) Surface parking lot means an off-street, ground level open area, usually improved, for the temporary storage of motor vehicles. (14) Transparent glass means windows that are transparent enough to permit the view of activities within a building from nearby streets, sidewalks and public spaces. Tinting or some coloration is permitted, provided a reasonable level of visibility is achieved. Reflective or very dark tinted glass does not accomplish this objective. (Ord, No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No, 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1634 Site design - All zoning districts. (a) General criteria, (1) Natural amenities such as views, significant or unique trees, creeks, riparian corridors, and similar features unique to the site should be incorporated into the design. (2) Pedestrian areas and amenities should be incorporated in the overall site design, Pedestrian areas include but are not limited to outdoor plazas, arcades, courtyards, seating areas, and amphitheaters. Pedestrian amenities include but are not limited to outdoor benches, tables and other furniture, balconies, gazebos, transparent glass at the ground floor, and landscaping. (3) Pedestrian areas should be easily seen, accessible, and located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, open spaces, significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure, (4) Project designers shall strive for overall design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project such as architectural style and features, materials, colors, and textures. (5) Place physical features, activities, and people in visible locations to maximize the ability to be seen, and therefore, discourage crime. For example, place cafes and food kiosks in parks to increase natural surveillance by park users, and place laundry facilities near play equipment in multiple family residential development. Avoid barriers, such as tall or overgrown landscaping or outbuildings, where they make it difficult to observe activity, (6) Provide access control by utilizing physical barriers such as bollards, fences, doorways, etc., or by security hardware such as locks, chains, and alarms. Where appropriate, utilize security guards. All of these methods result in increased effort to commit a crime, and therefore, reduce the potential for it to happen. (7) Design buildings and utilize site design that reflects ownership. For example, fences, paving, art, signs, good maintenance, and landscaping are some physical ways to express ownership, Identifying intruders is much easier in a well-defined space. An area that looks protected gives the impression that greater effort is required to commit a crime. A cared for environment can also reduce fear of crime. Areas that are run down and the subject of graffiti and vandalism are generally more intimidating than areas that do not display such characteristics, Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A iÞ2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 4 (b) Surface parking lots. (1) Site and landscape design for parking lots are subject to the requirements of Article XVII of this chapter. (2) Vehicle turning movements shall be minimized, Parking aisles without loop access are discouraged. Parking and vehicle circulation areas shall be clearly delineated using directional signage. (3) Driveways shall be located to be visible from the right-of-way but not impede pedestrian circulation on-site or to adjoining properties. Driveways should be shared with adjacent properties to minimize the number of driveways and curb cuts. (4) Multi-tenant developments with large surface parking lots adjacent to a right-of-way are encouraged to incorporate retail pads against the right-of-way to help break up the large areas of pavement. (5) See FWCC 22-1638 for supplemental guidelines. (c) Parking structures (includes parking floors located within commercial buildings). (I) The bulk (or mass) ofa parking structure as seen from the right-of-way should be minimized by placing its short dimension along the street edge, The parking structure should include active uses such as retail, offices or other commercial uses at the ground level and/or along the street frontage. (2) Parking structures which are part of new development shall be architecturally consistent with exterior architectural elements of the primary structure, including rooflines, facade design, and finish materials. (3) Parking structures should incorporate methods of articulation and accessory elements, pursuant to FWCC 22-1 635(c)(2), on facades located above ground level. (4) Buildings built over parking should not appear to "float" over the parking area, but should be linked with ground level uses or screening. Parking at grade under a building is discouraged unless the parking area is completely enclosed within the building or wholly screened with walls and/or landscaped benns. (5) Top deck lighting on multi-level parking structures shall be architecturally integrated with the building, and screened to control impacts to off-site uses. Exposed fluorescent light fixtures are not permitted, (6) Parking structures and vehicle entrances should be designed to minimize views into the garage interior from surrounding streets. Methods to help minimize such views may include, but are not limited to landscaping, planters, and decorative grilles and screens. (7) Security grilles for parking structures shall be architecturally consistent with and integrated with the overall design. Chain-link fencing is not permitted for garage security fencing. (8) See FWCC 22-1 638(c)(4) for supplemental guidelines, (d) Pedestrian circulation and public spaces. (I) Primary entrances to buildings should be clearly visible or recognizable from the right-of-way. Pedestrian pathways from rights-of-way and bus stops to primary entrances, from parking lots to primary 'entrances, and pedestrian areas, shall be accessible and should be clearly delineated, (2) Pedestrian pathways and pedestrian areas should be delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in paved texture and color, and protected from abutting vehicle circulation areas with landscaping, Approved methods of delineation include: stone, brick or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Paint striping on asphalt as a method of delineation is not encouraged. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <Þ2002 Code Publishing Co. File #O3-100842-00-UP Page 5 Figure I . See. 22. 1634 (d} "-dool... potllwoyl ~"" R.OW. 1"1110,,:2- Scc.l2- 16M!:!) Pt9."",. ,"n..""".. (3) Pedestrian connections should be provided between properties to establish pedestrian links to adjacent buildings, parking, pedestrian areas and public rights-of-way. (4) Bicycle racks should be provided for all commercial developments. (5) Outdoor furniture, fixtures, and streetscape elements, such as lighting, freestanding signs, trellises, arbors, raised planters, benches and other forms of seating, trash receptacles, bus stops, phone booths, fencing, etc., should be incorporated into the site design, (6) See FWCC 22-1638 for supplemental guidelines. (e) Landscaping. Refer to Article XVII of this chapter for specific landscaping requirements and for definitions of landscaping types referenced throughout this article. (f) Commercial service and institutional facilities. Refer to FWCC 22-949 and 22- I 564 for requirements related to garbage and recycling receptacles, placement and screening. (I) Commercial services relating to loading, storage, trash and recycling should be located in such a manner as to optimize public circulation and minimize visibility into such facilities. Service yards shall comply with the following: a. Service yards and loading areas shall be designed and located for easy access by service vehicles and tenants and shall not displace required landscaping, impede other site uses, or create a nuisance for adjacent property owners. b, Trash and recycling receptacles shall include covers to prevent odor and wind blown litter. c. Service yard walls, enclosures, and similar accessory site elements shall be consistent with the primary bui1ding(s) relative to architecture, materials and colors. d, Chain-link fencing shall not be used where visible ITom public streets, on-site major drive aisles, adjacent residential uses, or pedestrian areas. Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ~2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 0O842-00-UP Page 6 Fi~J -s",.22-IOJ.l(t) TIm.... lIo'og. ..... J -~ ... . . " -. " """"""'I';;~_;'~I' . ~ fI¡ur¡:4-S".22-t.~4(1) L""', .r..' (2) Site utilities shall comply with the following: a, Building utility equipment such as electrical panels and junction boxes should be located in an interior utility room. b, Site utilities including transfonners, fire standpipes and engineered retention ponds (except biofiltration swales) should not be the dominant element of the front landscape area. When these must be located in a front yard, they shall be either undergrounded or screened by walls and/or Type 1 landscaping, and shall not obstruct views of tenant common spaces, public open spaces, monument signs, and/or driveways, (g) Miscellaneous site elements. (I) Lighting shall comply with the following: a. Lighting levels shall not spill onto adjacent properties pursuant to FWCC 22-954( c). b, Lighting shall be provided in all loading, storage, and circulation areas, but shall incorporate cut-off shields to prevent off-site glare, c. Light standards shall not reduce the amount oflandscaping required for the project by Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping. (2) Drive-through facilities such as banks, cleaners, fast food, drug stores and service stations, etc" shall comply with the following: Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A "'2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-QQ-UP Page 7 a. Drive-through windows and stacking lanes are not encouraged along facades of buildings that face a right-of-way. If they are pennitted in such a location, then they shall be visually screened from such street by Type III landscaping and/or architectural element, or combination thereof, provided such elements reflect the primary building and provide appropriate screening. b. The stacking lane shall be physically separated from the parking lot, sidewalk, and pedestrian areas by Type III landscaping and/or architectural element, or combination thereof, provided such elements reflect the primary building and provide appropriate separation. Painted lanes are not sufficient. c, Drive-through speakers shall not be audible off site. d. A bypass/escape lane is recommended for all drive-through facilities. e. See FWCC 22-1638(d) for supplemental guidelines. (Ord, No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord, No. 99- 333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No, 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1635 Building design - All zoning districts. (a) General criteria. (1) Emphasize, rather than obscure, natural topography. Buildings should be designed to "step up" or "step down" hillsides to accommodate significant changes in elevation, unless this provision is precluded by other site elements such as stormwater design, optimal traffic circulation; or the proposed function or use of the site, nIlW"" S«. 'Z2 - 1625(0) ~mpho- ......, "~t (2) Building siting or massing shall preserve public viewpoints as designated by the Comprehensive Plan or other adopted plans or policies, (3) Materials and design features offences and walls should reflect that of the primary building(s). (b) Building facade modulation and screening options, defined, All building facades that are both longer than 60 feet and are visible from either a right-of-way or residential use or zone shall incorporate facade treatment according to this section. Subject facades shall incorporate at least two of the four options described herein; except, however, facades that are solidly screened by Type I landscaping, pursuant to Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping, may use facade modulation as the sole option under this section, Options used under this section shall be incorporated along the entire length of the facade, in any approved combination. Options used must meet the dimensional standards as specified herein; except, however, if more than two are used, dimensional requirements for each option will be detennined on a case-by-case basis; provided, that the gross area of a pedestrian plaza may not be less than the specified minimum of200 square feet. See FWCC 22-l638(c) for guidelines pertaining to city center core and city center frame. (I) Facade modulation. Minimum depth: two feet; minimum width: six feet; maximum width: 60 feet. Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved facade elements, off-set planes, wing walls and terracing, will be considered; provided, that the intent of this section is met. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A @2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 8 .-.:..;,:~;t:.:,;....;,-...~.. k G"'.-""_' J fjg1U'" 6. See. 22. Hil, (bí ""..,..,..""............ (2) Landscape screening. Eight-foot-wide Type II landscape screening along the base of the facade, except Type IV may be used in place of Type II for facades that are comprised of 50 percent or more window area, and around building entrance(s). For building facades that are located adjacent to a property line, some or all of the underlying buffer width required by Article XVII of this chapter, Landscaping, may be considered in meeting the landscape width requirement of this section. ","-"ø .~: ; ~~ '. "'001- """,' : . Gf; "'910 '04'@ Gll' .,to"~'Ït'" ~- fjg¡¡r<?-Scc. 22-1635 (b) -'PO'~ ...,,- ....." (3) Canopy or arcade, As a modulation option, canopies or arcades may be used only along facades that are visible from a right-of-way. Minimum length: 50 percent of the length of the facade using this option, (4) Pedestrian Plaza. Size of plaza: Plaza square footage is equal to one percent of the gross floor area of the building, but it must be a minimum of200 square feet. The plaza should be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way, Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <1:>2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00.UP Page 9 ~ a;- ç ~- ~ ! =~ Filf"" 8 - Sec. 22 - 11>35 (b) -'I"H"'~' ...,.."",ea.. -' ~--' .~.. Fig-"" 9 - B«. 22-1~35(ò) -"""""9".- pi... (c) Building articulation and scale. (1) Building facades visible ITom rights-of-way and other public areas should incorporate methods of articulation and accessory elements in the overall architectural design, as described in subsection (c)(2) of this section. FíJlUftW,""'.22 ".,5«1 Bulldlnlf............ Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <Þ2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 10 ~ H~u,c 11-5<:<.22. IH>(CJ ""-"1 80...",. .,"~.',' . n ~ - .. Ar1wo"-."'" I ~h........ ...~OW. Fi",,!I'<' I) Sec. 2} I (,'~ (cJ ~~ ~....";;;-..:<. lWJ!J LJblJ =£5 "'..""'~.. """"". ""."."""",, """"r.. ..""", ..",...,~ Pi""" 13. s<>:.!z, lóJJ (0) ,--"". ...w..".... (2) Methods to articulate blank walls: Following is a nonexclusive list of methods to articulate blank walls, pursuant to FWCC 22-!564(u) and subsection (c)(1) of this section: a. Showcase, display, recessed windows; b. Window openin!!s with visible trim material, or painted detamn!! that resembles trim; b~. Vertical trellis(es) in front of the wall with climbing vines or similar planting; Gi!, Set the wall back and provide a landscaped or raised planter bed in front of the wall, with plant material that will obscure or screen the wall's surface; ~. Artwork such as mosaics, murals, decorative masonry or metal patterns or grillwork, sculptures, relief, etc., over a substantial portion of the blank wall surface. (The Federal Way arts commission may be used as an advisory body at the discretion of the planning staff); af. Architectural features such as setbacks, indentations, overhangs, projections, articulated cornices, bays, reveals, canopies, and awnings; fg. Material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, or textural changes; and g!!. Landscaped public plaza(s) with space for vendor carts, concerts and other pedestrian activities, (3) See FWCC 22-l638(c) for supplemental guidelines. (Ord. No, 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord, No, 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A rQ2002 Code Puhlishing Co. File #O3-IOO842-00-UP Page I I 22-1636 Building and pedestrian orieutation - All zoning districts. (a) Building and pedestrian orientation, (I) Buildings should generally be oriented to rights-of-way, as more particularly described in FWCC 22- I 638. Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows, should be oriented to the right-of-way; otherwise, screening or art features such as trellises, artwork, murals, landscaping, or combinations thereof, should be incorporated into the street-oriented facade (does not app~' to residential :lones). (2) Plazas, public open spaces and entries should be located at street corners to optimize pedestrian access and use, 01,[1""'14.8«22-1636(0) Shore<! M1Ic opmoo'ÞI.... (3) All buildings adjacent to the street should provide visual access from the street into human services and activities within the building, if applicable, (4) Multiple buildings on the same site should incorporate public spaces (fonnaI or infonnal). These should be integrated by elements such as plazas, walkways, and landscaping along pedestrian pathways, to provide a clear view to destinations, and to create a unified, campus-like development. (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; O,d. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1637 Mixed-use residential buildings in commercial zoning districts. (a) Ground level facades ofmixed-use buildings that ITont a public right-of-way shall meetthe following guidelines: (I) Retail, commercial, or office activities shall occupy at least 20 percent of the gross ground floor, area of the building (unless exempt from this requirement by FWCC district zoning regulations). (2) ¡fparking occupies the ground level, see FWCC 22-l634(c). JÐ UUß HJJ Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <l:>2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-IOO842-00-UP Page 12 (3) Landscaped gardens, courtyards, or enclosed terraces for private use by residents should be designed with minimum exposure to the right-of-way, (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord, No, 99-333, § 3,1-19- 99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3, 1-16-01) 22-1638 District guidelines. In addition to the foregoing development guidelines, the following supplemental guidelines apply to individual zoning districts: (a) Professional office (PO), neighborhood business (BN), and community business (BC), (I) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1634( d), (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right-of-way or pedestrian area. (4) Ifutilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl-coated mesh and powder-coated poles, For residential uses only: (5) Significant trees shall be retained within a 20-foot perimeter strip around site. (6) Landscaped yards shall be provided between buiIding(s) and public street(s), Parking lots should be beside or behind buildings that front upon streets. (7) Parking lots should be broken up into rows containing no more than 10 adjacent stalls, separated by planting areas. (8) Pedestrian walkways (minimum six feet wide) shall be provided between the interior of the project and the public sidewalk. (9) Lighting fixtures should not exceed 20 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. This shall not apply to public parks and school stadiums and other comparable Iarl!e institutional uses. The maximum heil!ht for larl!e institutioual uses shall be 30 feet and shall include cutoff shields. 20' fig=16-S<ç.22-1638/.) (10) Principal entries to buildings shall be highlighted with plaza or garden areas containing planting, lighting, seating, trellises and other features, Such areas shall be located and designed so windows overlook them, Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <¡J2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 13 fí~,"" 17 . !!Iv 22. 16)8 (¡o) (II) Common recreational spaces shall be located and arranged so that windows overlook them, ~:if~ Fle.,dS-""',.22-IM8(.;' (12) Units on the ground floor (when pennitted) shall have private outdoor spaces adjacent to them so those exterior portions of the site are controlled by individual households. Fig"", 19 - 5«, 2, - 16.18 {iJ (13) All new buildings, including accessory buildings, such as carports and garages shall appear to have a roof pitch ranging from at least 4: 12 to a maximum of 12: 12. ~2' . 4' -~~",~" '.' Design Guidelines & Definition of Heighl Code Amendments Exhibit A <1)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 14 (14) Carports and garages in front yards should be discouraged. (15) The longest dimension of any building facade shall not exceed 120 feet. Buildings on the same site may be connected by covered pedestrian walkways. (16) Buildings should be designed to have a distinct "base", "middle" and "top" The base (typically the first floor) should contain the greatest number of architectural elements such as windows, materials, details, overhangs, cornice lines, and masonry belt courses. The midsection by comparison may be simple. (Note: single-story buildings have no middle,) The top should avoid the appearance ofa flat roofand include distinctive roof shapes including but not limited to pitched, vaulted or terraced, etc. fEIBE8ææ Egu..-21- S<'ç, 22'1638(.) (17) Residential design features, including but not limited to entry porches, projecting window bays, balconies or decks, individual windows (rather than strip windows), offsets and cascading or stepped roof forms shall be incorporated into all buildings. Window openings shall have visible trim material or painted detailing that resembles trim. (b) Office park (OP), corporate park (CP), and business park (BP). (1) Surface parking may be located behind the building, to the side(s) of the building, or adjacent to the right-of-way; provided, however, that parking located adjacent to the right-of-way maximizes pedestrian access and circulation pursuant to FWCC 22-1 634(d). (2) Buildings with ground floor retail sales or services should orient major entrances, display windows and other pedestrian features to the right-of-way to the extent possible. (3) Ground-level mirrored or reflective glass is not encouraged adjacent to a public right-of-way or pedestrian area. (4) If utilized, chain-link fences visible from public rights-of-way shall utilize vinyl-coated mesh and powder-coated poles, For non-single-family residential uses only: (5) Subsections (a)(5) through (A)(17) of this section shall apply. (c) City center core (CC-C) and city center frame (CC-F). (I) The city center core and frame will contain transitional forms of development with surface parking areas, However, as new development or re-development occurs, the visual dominance of surface parking areas shall be reduced. Therefore, surface parking areas shall be located as follows: a, The parking is located behind the building, with the building located between the right-of-way and the parking areas, or it is located in structured parking; or b. All or some of the parking is located to the side(s) ofthe building; or c. Some short-term parking may be located between the building(s) and the right-of-way, but this shall not consist of more than one double-loaded drive aisle, and pedestrian circulation shall be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d), Large retail complexes may not be able to locate parking according to the above guidelines. Therefore, retail complexes of 60,000 square feet of gross floor area or larger may locate surface parking between the building(s) and the right-of-way. However, this form of development shall provide for small building(s) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A í:>2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 0O842-00-UP Page 15 along the right-of-way to break up and reduce the visual impact of the parking, and pedestrian circulation must be provided pursuant to FWCC 22-1634(d), For purposes of this guideline, retail complex means the entire lot or parcel, or series of lots or parcels, on which a development, activity or use is located or will locate. (2) Entrance facades shall front on, face, or be clearly recognizable from the right-of-way; and should incorporate windows and other methods of articulation, (3) Building facades that are visible fi'om a right-of-way and subject to modulation per FWCC 22- l635(b), shall incorporate facade treatment as follows: a. The facade incorporates modulation and/or a landscape screening, pursuant to FWCC 22- 1635(b); and b. The facade incorporates an arcade, canopy or plaza; and/or one or more articulation element listed in FWCC 22-l635(c)(2); provided, that the resulting building characteristics achieve visual interest and appeal at a pedestrian scale and proximity, contribute to a sense of public space, and reinforce the pedestrian experience. (4) Drive-through facilities and stacking lanes shall not be located along a facade of a building that faces a right-of-way. (5) Above-grade parking structures with a ground level facade visible from a right-of-way shall incorporate any combination ofthe following elements at the ground level: a. Retail, commercial, or office uses that occupy at least 50 percent of the building's lineal frontage along the right-of-way; or b. A 15-foot-wide strip of Type III landscaping along the base of the facade; or c, A decorative grille or screen that conceals interior parking areas from the right-of-way. (6) Facades of parking structures shall be articulated above the ground level pursuant to FWCC 22- l635(c)(l), (7) When curtain wall glass and steel systems are used to enclose a building, the glazing panels shall be transparent on 50 percent ofthe ground floor facade fronting a right-of-way or pedestrian area. (8) Chain-link fences shall not be allowed, Barbed or razor wire shall not be used. For non-single-family residential uses only: (9) Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(I 7) of this section shall apply. (d) For all residential zones. (I) Non-residential uses, Subsections (a)(5) through (a)(IO) and (a)(I3) through (a)(I7) of this section shall apply. (2) Non-single-family residential uses, Subsections (a)(5) through (aX I 7) of this section shall apply, (Ord. No. 96-271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No. 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) 22-1639 Institutional uses. (a) In all zonin!! districts where such uses are permitted the followin!! shall apply. (1) Sections 22-1634, 22-1635, and 22-1636. (2) Subsections 1638(a)(1) throu!!h (a)(5) and (a)(7) throu!!h (a)(9). (3) Duildin!! facades that exceed 120 feet in len!!th and are visible from an adjacent residential zone, ri!!ht-of-way or public park or recreation area shall incorporate a si!!nificant structural modulation (offset). The minimum depth ofthe modulation shall be approximately equal to ten percent of the totallenl!th of the subject facade and the minimum width shall be approximately twice the minimum depth. The modulation shall be intel!ral to the buildinl! structure from base to roofline. (4) Roof desi!!n shall utilize forms and materials that avoid the I!eneral appearance of a "flat" roof. Rooflines with an intel!raI and obvious architectural pitch are an approved method to meet this I!uideline. Alternative distinctive roofforms such as varied and multiple stepped rooflines, architectural parapets, articulated cornices and fascias, arches, eyebrows, and Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <02002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-100842-00-UP Page 16 similar methods will be considered by the director provided that the roof desi!.!n minimizes uninterrupted horizontal planes and results in architectural and visual appeal. (5) Alternative methods to or!.!anize aud shape the structural elements of a buildiu!.! and provide facade treatment pursuant to Subsection 1635(h) and/or (3), above, will be considered by the director as part of an overall desi!.!u that addresses the followin!.! criteria: a. Facade desi!.!n incorporates at least two ofthe options listed at Subsection 1635(b); b. The location and dimensions of structural modulations are proportionate to the hei!!ht and len!!th of the subiect facade, usin!! Subsections 1635(b) and (3) above, as a !.!uideline: c. Facade desi!.!n incorporates a maiority of architectural and accessory desi!.!n elements listed at Subsection 22-1635(c)(2) and maximizes buildin!! and pedestrian orientation pursuant to Section 22-1636: and d. Overall buildin!.! desi!.!n utilizes a combination of structural modulation, facade treatment, and roof elements that or!.!anize and vary build in!.! bulk and scale, add architectural interest, and appeal at a pedestrian scale, and when viewed from an adiacent residential zoue, ri!!hts-of-way, or other public area, results in a project that meets the intent of these !.!uidelines. (6) The director may permit or require modifications to the parkin!.! area landscapin!! standards of Subsection 1638(a)(7) for Iaudscape desi!!ns that preserve and enhance existin!! natural features aud systems, provided that the total amount of existiu!! and proposed landscapiu!! within parkin!.! area(s) meets the applicable square foota!.!e requirement ofFWCC Article XVII, Landscapin!!, and the location and arran!!ement of such Iandscapin!! is approved by the director. Existin!! natural features and systems include environmentally sensitive areas, stauds of si!!nificant trees and native ve!.!etation, natural topo!.!raphy and draina!.!e patterns, wildlife habitat, mi!.!ration corridors, and connectivity to adiacent habitats. 22-16;W~ Design criteria for public on-site open space. The following guidelines apply to public on-site open space that is developed pursuant to the height bonus program established in Article XI, Division 8, ofthis chapter. (1) Open space developed under this section should be located so that it: a, Abuts a public right-of-way, or alternatively, is visible and accessible from a public right-of- way; b, Is bordered on at least one side by, or is readily accessible from, structure(s) with entries to retail or office uses; housing, civic/public uses, or another public open space; and c. Is situated for maximum exposure to sunlight. (2) Open space site design and configuration must meet a majority ofthe following guidelines: a, The gross area ofthe open space does not incorporate any other site elements such as setbacks, landscaping, buffers, paving, or storm drainage facilities, that would otherwise be incorporated into site design without exercising the open space option; b, The gross area of the open space encompasses at least 2.5 percent of the lot area, up to a total aggregate square footage of25,000 square feet; c, The open space area must be clearly visible and accessible from the adjacent right-of-way; d, The primary area is at least 25 feet in width; e. A minimum of 15 percent ofthe total area of the open space is landscaped using Type IV landscaping or other landscaping alternative; and f. The open space may not be used for parking or loading of commercial vehicles. Commercial vehicle loading areas abutting the open space must be screened by a solid, site-obscuring wall. (Ord, No. 96- 271, § 3, 7-2-96; Ord. No, 99-333, § 3,1-19-99; Ord, No, 01-382, § 3,1-16-01) Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A ~2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 0O842-00-UP Page 17 22-16401 Design for cluster residential subdivision lots. (a) Garages shall be provided for all residential lots except if the lot is in a multifamily zone. (b) Front entryways should be the prominent feature of the home, Attached garages should not compose more than 40 percent of the front facade ofthe single-family home ifthe garage doors are flush with the front facade, or will be set back a minimum of five feet from the rest of the front facade. Detached garages should also be set back a minimum of five feet from the facade. (c) If garage access is provided from alleys, the front yard setback can be reduced to 15 feet. (d) Each dwelling unit shall be intended for owner occupancy. (Ord, No. 01-381, § 3,1-16-01) 22-164l~- 22-1650 Reserved. Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <1;)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 18 Sec. 22-601. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be pennitted in the suburban estate (SE) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: '" z 0 ¡:: -<: ...¡ ;:¡ '" USE ~ Church. synagogue or other place of relig;ous worship USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read do~ to find uso, . THEN, "TO" fm REGULATIONS MINIMUMS I MAXIMUMS REQUlREDYARDS on ¡:] ~ 0'" ~~ :oi:J 0'> ~~ "' f¡j '"' 0 ...¡ 'B Jj, "' ~ "' C> ;:i ""~ "' 0:0 6 5:t; u c>:o '"' - '" 3 !H; 75% 35 ft. above average bu;lding elevation. '"' ~ "" '" ~ Proce" IV 15 acres 130 ft. 130ft. 130ft. See note I P'"e" l, n. ltl ""d IV Me de",ribed in §§ 22-351 - 22-356, 22-361 - 22.370, 22-386 - 22-411, 22-431 - 22-460 resDOChvoly. A 1 This use must obtain a m"'ter plan appro"d through Process IV. The m"ter plan must show the ultimate development of the Iransportatiun site induding alt build;ngs, parking and circulation areas, other majm improvements and buffers. For oTOoosaJs_alsnreouirin' a management develooment "reemeot lhe C;l)' council's oublic h",;n, on a develoomenl mccmenJ,shalt take the olaceofthe p"¡'lic h"ring plan (TMP) fo"master nlan aooroval bv the hearing "xaminer . . shalt be 2 The subject property may contain "ectory orsimilar dwelting unitfmuse by the religious leader of the congregation. Iftb" " submitted", a detached dwelting unit, ;ts setbacks are " established for detached dwelting uoits in the wne. S t I art fth 3.Thesubjeclpropertymustbeadjacenttoacolteclororarterialright-of-way. 4e~no~s6 p lo.e 1.thRJ Fonion ofastfUctüT"nt."ubj," prepert) islocat,dl",than1PoftfTOmaR adja".t!o d'n"i~'nn"tbeneith" ~ i:~~'~"¡, It a.TÀ,.,ight.ft.atpoctionoft.,","".",.all.,t"""d15A.abo" "'g' b',;lding ,I, alion:.r e sa b.Tb,facad,ofthatpoctioo.fth""""""pamll,lt.tb,l. d",i~ ".,h,lIn.t"""d,PAinl"gtb addres~ the 4. Maximum height of an V portion oftbe building mav be increased from 35 feet to 40 feet if all of the following are met followmg: a. Tbe additional height is necessa", to accommodate the oarticu]" use conducted in the building' and traffic control, b. Eacb required wd abutting the 'tructure is increased one ft. for each one ft the structure exceeds 35 fcct p"king c. An incre"e in height shall not block views designated bv the comprehensive olano demand and 5. Maximum beightofthe sanctua", or principal worsbip area mav be increased to 55 feel ifall of the following criteria "e met management, a. Each required vard abutting the structure is increased one 1\. for each one 1\ the structure exceeds 35 ft above average building and traffic elevation. movemen!!o b. An increase in height shall not block views designated bv the comorehensive olan the adjacent 6. Religious svmbols and icons for chnrches and other religious institutions rnav exceed the highest point of the nnderlving roof on slreet system. which it is mounted bv an additional 15 ft. orovided that such svmbol is a minor architectural accent and on]v one such svmbol IS permitted on tbe orincipal structure for this nse. ~ Z Referto§22-946etseq. to determine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. <h I!, Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping. for appropriate requirements. 1- 2. For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII ~ ill For community design gnidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIx. C Fm otb" infonnation about parking ,"dparking ate"" see § 22-1376 et sec. I l ¡:] U '" .. 0'" ~C> -2'; §~ ~¡;:; ZONE SE SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES For detail, of what may exceed this beight limit, see §22-1O46 et soq. FordetaiisreganJingrequiredyatds,soe§22-1131etsoq. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(15.35), 2-27-90: Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B), 4-20-93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3. 4-1-97: Ord. No. 99-333, § 3, 1-19-99: Ord. No. 01-385. § 3, 4-3-01) Desigtt Guidelines & Definitiott of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <Þ2002 Code Publishing Co. File #O3-IOO842-00-UP Page 19 Sec. 22-635. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be pennitted in the single family residential (RS) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: '" Z 0 ¡:: < ...¡ ;:¡ '" USE ~ Church, synagogue or other place of religious worship USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use.. . THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS I MAXIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS '" ~~~ ::>-u 0'>0 ~~g: U1 ¡¡j .... 0 ...¡ Process As 130ft. IV estahlished on the See note zoning :Ie map. See note 1. Pm"ss I, II, III ~d IV a" d""ribed in §§~22.351-22-356, 22-361-22-370 22.386-22-411 22-431 -22.460".""",",oIv. .... § '" U1:è '" 0 t;;! ~ ~ h", §~~ ~ ;;:; ~ SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES A 1. Minimum 101 size perdw,lling unilis as follows. transportation a. In RS 350 znnes, the minimum lot size is 35,000 sq. ft. management b. In RS 15.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 15,000 sq. ft plan (TMP) c. In RS 9.6 zone" the minimum lot size is 9,600 sq. ft shall be d. In RS 7.2 zones, the minimum lot size is 7,200 sq. ft. submitted as e. In RS 5.0 zones, the minimum lot size is 5,000 sq. ft S t I rt fth 2. If the subject property, along witb any contiguo", area intended for future use forthereligious activit.ies.or.re lated purposes, is more 5 e~ n~ l~ pa 10 f e than 5 acres, the use must obtain a mosterplan appmved thmugh Pmcess IV. The mosterplan must show the uItimate developmentoftbe 8= ite *~;n. site including all buildings, p~rking and eirculotioa areas, other major improvements and buffers,FQUfw"i¡.also reouirin. a ~ deveionmeatmeement tbe_clt)' councIl's aublre hearmg oaa develoameat ameme.at shall take the otace of the nublrc beanng for.'!liI'lli sball addr~ss plan aporoval bv the heari" examine[. the followmg: 3. Th, subj"t prop,1t) m" ,.ntai, a "cto'"' or similar ò ,Ili'g ..it for use 1>, th, "ligious i..ò" ofth, eo'g"gatio,. IfIRis is a traffic ò,tashcò ò" .lli'g unit, i~ s"Þasks are " ",abIioh,ò for ò""h,ò ò" ,1liAg units in tho "". control, 1. Th"ubjcctprop'l1j m""b.aòja"ntt' a coll,eror or m"ial ,ight of" '0). parking 5. Ifany portion of a struerure on the subject property is located Ie" than 100 ft. from an adjacent low density zone, then either. demand ROd a. Tire asigHt .ftaat p,"iQR ofths "",er"" ,aall notcx",ò 15 A. ab, " "ag' building .1, atien: or management, b The facade of that portion of the structure parallel to the low density zone shall not exceed 50 ft. in length and traffic 5. Maximum beight ofanv portion of the building may be increos,d from 30 feet to 40 feet ifall of the following are met. movement to a. The additional heigbt is necess,"" to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building and the adjacent b. Each required vard abctting the structure is increased one ft for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 feet street system. c An increase in height shall not block views designated bv the comprehensive ptan 6. Maximum height oftbc sanctuary or principal worship area mav be increased to 55 feet if all of the following criteria are met. a. Each reQuired vard abutting the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft the structure exceeds 30 It. above ave"" building elevation b. An increase in height shall not block views designated bv the comprehensive plan. 7. Architectural extensions of fiat rooftines such as parapets and articulated cornices mav exceed the 30 ft. base height limit bv three ft 8. Religious symbols and icons for chccches and other religious institutions mav exceed the highest point of the underlving roof on which iti is mounted bv an additional 15 ft. provided that such svmbol is a minnr architectural accent and onlv one such svmbot is oennitted on the I principal structure fnr this use. ó, L Parking may be located within required side and rear yards, but not closer than 15 ft tn any property line "" ~ Referto § 22-946 etseq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. &c ~ Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriate requirements '" ill For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. +<), I I. For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX L- For othe< information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 et seq. "' " ~ "' ....> 00 ...¡u '"~ 0::> ...."" ;¡:U ,,::> -'" ~t; 30 ft. above average building elevation. ZONE RS I For details of what may exceed this height limil, see § 22-1046 et seq. For details regarding required yards, see § 22-1131 et seq. (o,d.No. 90-43,§2(20.25), 2-27-90;o,d. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B), 4-20-93; o,d.No. 97.291, §3, 4-1-97;Or.d. No. 99-333, §3, 1-19-99; O,d. Nc. 01-385,§J,4-3-DI) 30ft. 130ft. 175% See notes 3 - 6 I Design Guidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A <Q2002 Code Publishing Co. File #O3-1O0842-00-UP Page 20 Sec. 22-671. Churches, etc. The following uses shall be pennitted in the multifamily residential (RM) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find nse... THEN, across for REGULATIONS MINIMUMS I MAXIMUMS REQUIRED YARDS USE Church. synagogue or other place of religious worship ~ ¡: ;:¡ ;;, '-' :;¡ ~ '" 15 0'" gj~ 5g¡ 0'> gjgj .... ~ '" :¡; -! '" 0 ü3 '" N ü3 Ó ...J See note I. Process I, II, III and IV are described in I §§22-351-22-356, 22-361- 22-370, 22-386-22-411, 22ÆI- 2~Dectjyelv '" -<: gj '" CO ~ '" ....> 00 ...JU ",gj 0;;, ...."" :tu CO;;' -'" gjt;; InRM3.6 and 2.4 zones, 30 fi. above average building elevation. InRM 1.8 zones, 35 ft. above average building elevation. if] u ~ 0'" gjCO -Ï!i 5~ gj~ ZONE RM SPECIAL REGULA nONS AND NOTES A 1. If the "bjoet property, along with ""y cnntiguous area intended for future use for the religious activities or related purposes, is tr,,"sportation more th,," 5 acres, the use must obtain a master pi,," approved thmugh Procm IV. The master plan must show the ultimate management development of the site including all buildings, parking and circulation areas, other major impmvements ,,"d buITers. For pI,," (TMP) pmpo"ls also requiring a development agreemeot, the city coundrs public hearing on a development agreement shall take the shall be place of the public heOting for master plan approval by the hearing examiner submitted as 2. The subject property may contain a rectory orsimilar dwelling unit for u," by the religious leader ofthecongregation. If this is art of the a detacheddwelling unit, its setbacks are as established for detached dwelling units in the zone p r t' 3. The subject property must be adjacent to a collector or arteroal roght-of-way. i:~~~n. 1IfaR:paHionohstR"tR"oRtho'fbj"tp"p'w,isl","dl"sthaoIOQA.fmmalo ;'nsi~zoR"th'n,itlr'r e a.TRolroightofllr"'ßMi9RoftH"t,"etrcuHollnet"""dl'ftabo """ag' building 01"alion; or shall addr~ss b. TIr, facad, ofllral poRion of tho ""Jetu« p",llol to IHO 10 dORSi~ .0.. shall not """d 50 ft in longllr the followmg: 4. Maximum height of an v portion of the buHding mav be increased from 30 feet in RM 3.6 ,,"d RM 2.4 zones and 35 feet in RM traffic I.8 zones to 40 feel ifoll of the following are met. control, a. The additional height is necess,"" to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building' and parking b. Each reouired vard abutting the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft. the structure exceeds 30 ft. in RM 3.6 and RM See note, 4, I demand and 2.4 zones and 35 feet in RM 1.8 zones above average building elevation. 5 6 and 7 management. c. An increase in height shan not block views designated bv the comprehensive plan. and traffic 5. Maximum height of the sanctuary or principal worship area mav be increased to 55 feet if all of the following criteria are met movement to a. Each reouired vord abutting the structure is increased one ft. for each one ft. the structuce exceeds 35 ft. above average the adjacent building elevation. street system. b. An increase in height shan not block views designated bv the comprehensive pi,," 6. Architectural extensions of flat rooftines such as para""ts and articulated cornices may exceed the 30 ft. base herght hmft bv three ft. 7. Religious svmbols and icons for churches and other religious institutions may exceed the highest point of the underlving roof on which it is mounted bv "" additional 15 ft. provided that such svmbol is a minor architectural accent and on Iv one such symbol is ""nnitted on the principal structure for this use >'1L Parking may be located within required side and rear yards, but not closer than IS ft. to any property line. ~ ~ Refer to § 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject property. +- ill Refer to Article XVII, Landscaping, for appropriate requirements. &0 LL For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII 90 ß For community design guidelines that apply to the project, see Article XIX l L For other information about parking and parking areas, see § 22-1376 etseq. For details of what may exceed this height limil, see § 22- 1046 el seq. For details regarding required yards, see §22-I131 etseq. (Ord. No. 90-43, § 2(25.35), 2-27-90; Ord. No. 93-170. § 7(Exh. B), 4-20-93; Ord. No. 97-291, § 3, 4-1-97; Ord. No. 99-333, §3, 1-19-99; Ord. No. 01-385, § 3,4-3-01; Ord. No. 02-426, § 3,10-15-02) Design Gttidelines & Definition of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A Ç)2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03- 1O0842-00-UP Page 21 22-755 Schools -Day care facilities - Churches. The following uses shall be pennitted in the commuoity busioess (BC) zone subject to the regulations and notes set forth in this section: USE ZONE CHART ~ DIRECTIONS: FIRST, read down to find use . ::: Minimums j ~ Required Yards G ë '" "",- ~ .§.~ !~ THEN, across for REGULATIONS USE ~ N ¡;; .3 E .:: f¡ ~ '" ¡;; :. ~ ~ ~ ;:3 ~g :tv> g "'~ H' ~£ ZONE DC SPECIAL REGULATIONS AND NOTES SChOOIS""jrocess IIINone business or vocational Possible schools, or Process trade schools III 20 ft. 10 ft. 0 ft. 55 ft. above Schools and day 1. Ifany portion of astructure on the subject property is located less than 100 ft. from an adjacentresidential zone, then that portion of See notes 1 and 11 average care: the structure shall not exceed 30 ft. above amage building elevation and the structure shall be set back a minimum of20 ft. from the building Determined on a property line of the "sidential zone elevation for case-by-case 2. Except for gyms, ifapproved through process III, the height of a structure may exceed 35 ft. above average building elevation to a gyms if basis maximum of 55 ft, ifall of the following ctiteriaare met located 100 a. Theadditional height is necessary to accommodate the particular use conducted in the building; and, ft. or more A transportation ele~;t;:~;h::¿Ui"d yard abutting the structure is incre""ed five ft. focoach one ft. the structure exceeds 35 ft. aboveaverage building ITdom an m¡ana(gTeMmpen)t c The increased height is consistent with goals and policies for the area of the subject property as established by the comprehensive a ~acent p an plan resldenlial shall be 3. For any structure, including gyms, an increase in height above 35 ft. shall not block views designated by the comprehensive plan. zone submitted as 4. Religious svmbols and icons for churches and other religious institutions mav exceed the highest ooint of the underlving roof on part of the which it is mounted bv an additiooal15 ft. orovided that such symbol is aminorarchitectural accent and onlv one such svmbol is 35 ft. above application. The oennitted on the orincioal structure for this use. average TMP shall <k ~ Church facilities may contain a recto')' or similar dwelling unit for use by the religious leader ofthe congregation building address the ~2cDay care facilities must contain an outdoor play area with at least 75 sq ft for each child using the area at any one time. This play elevation for following: area must be completely enclosed by a solid fence or other screen at least six ft. in height Play equipment and structured play areas must all other traffic control, be set back at le""t five ft. from each property line. structures parking demand Gc L Day care facilities may include accessory living facilities as defined by ~ 22-1 and +, ~ Day care facilities and schools must comply with the requirements of the State Department of Social and Health Services and/or the See notes I management, StateSuperintendeatofPublictnstruction - J 4 and traffic g, '1c All activities pertaining to schools, business or vocational schools, or trade schools, such as auto-repair or other uses that may - movement to the impact adjacent properties. must take place within an enclosed building. adjacent street "- ill No maximum lot coverage is established. Instead, the buildable area will be detennined by oth" site development requirements system. ~,~~~~~:~:~;¡~a~~:~:;~~\~~1i~:;;~;; :~~~c~ -;;::e~:~~:~~i:;~ ~~icle XIX J-k lL Fo, landscaping requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVII. +z.1l For sign requirements that apply to the project, see Article XVIII. -'-'-lie Refer to ~ 22-946 et seq. to detennine what other provisions of this chapter may apply to the subject pmperty. M- Q Schools may locate containers on-site for the storage of em"gency preparedness supplies as an accessory use Conta;n"s may not be located in any required yard. Landscaping may be required by the director of community development services to screen the installation if the proposed location will be visible from a public right-of-way and/or neighboring properties. Siting is subject to review and approval und" pmcess 1, Site Plan Review, unless pmposed as acomponentofanother project; in which casethe siting ofthe container will be reviewed as part of the overall development proposal and subject to the underlying review process C Fmoth" info=ation about parking and parking areas. see§22-t376 etseq. I Fo,delails of what may "ceed this height limit, see § 22-1046 et seq. Fordetail"egardin"'qui"d yard" see § 22-1 t3I et seq. Day care I See note facilities, 2 except Class IIhnme occupations Church, synagogue or oth" place of religinus worship PmmsI,TI,lIIandIVaredeseribedin I §§22.351-22-356, 22-361 -22-370 22-386-22-4lt, 22-431-22-460. ,=cclivelv. (On!. No. 90-43 § 2(45.65),2.27-90: Ord. No. 93-170, § 7(Exh. B), 4.20-93: û,d. No. 96-270, ~ 5, 7-2-96:0rd. No. 97.29!, § 3,4-1-97; O,d.No. 01-385, § 3, 4-3-DI: O,d. No. Ot-399 ~3, 8-7.0t) Design Guidelines & Definilion of Height Code Amendments Exhibit A "'2002 Code Publishing Co. File #03-1 00842-00-UP Page 22