The URL can be used to link to this page

Council PKT 01-06-1998 Regular I City of Federal Way City Council Meeting AGENDA COUNCILMEMBERS Jeanne Burbidge Jack Dovey Mary Gates Ron Gintz Linda Kachmar Michael Park Phil Watkins CITY MANAGER Kenneth E. Nyberg Office of the City Clerk JANUARY 6,1998 ~ ~- ( I. ll. ill. IV. V. a. b. VI. ** VIT. a. b. c. d. e. VITI. AGENDA FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Council Chambers - City Hall January 6, 1998 - 7:00 p.m. ***** - '...'- .-- , CALL MEETING TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SWEARING IN CEREMONY Council members-Elect Burbidge, Kochmar & Watkins SELECTION OF MAYOR & DEPUTY MAYOR ** PUBLIC RECEPfION FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS ** PRESENT A TIONS Martin Luther King, Jr. Proclamation Human Services Commissioner Introduction CITIZEN COMMENT (3 minute limit per person) CONSENT AGENDA Minutes/December 16, 1997 Re,gular Meeting Voucher/December 16, 1997 Monthly Financial Report/November 1997 Council BiIl #IS7/CiviI Service Code Amendment/Enactment Ordinance Council Bill HISS/Subdivision Code Amendments/Enactment Ordinance CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Council Committee Appointments over please. . . .. ~ \ I IX. CITY MANAGER REPORT X. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XI. ADJOURNMENT (, .:~.~- ( -.. .. PLEASBCOMPLBTR PINK SUP &: PRF.8RNT TO THB DEPUTY CITY CT FRK PRIOR TO SPI!AKlNO Citizens may addrca. 1M City Council at tbia time. Wbca rccopizcd by tho Mayor, plcuc come forward to 1hc podium. adjult IIIÍCI'OphOIMI to prop« hdcht, and atatc your - and addrcaa for the record. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR RRMARKS TO THREE m MINUTF.8. CiIúma may commc:ot CX1 iødividualaceada item.a at IÍmCI duriag any regularly scheduled City Couaci1I11CC1ÎDC, prior to Couucil discua.iCX1. 1bcac itcma iDcludc, but arc DOt limited to, Ordiaancea, RcaoIu1iooa and Council Busines. islllCl. Thcae comment IÍmCI atO in addition to 1hc C"atizea Comment at 1hc bccÍIIIIÎIIg of each rcguIarIy acbcdu1cd JDCCtÍDg. MEETING DATE: January 6,1998 ITEM# 7lL~ (4,1 ') """""""""""""""""""""""""""""".......................................................................",..................".....................................................................,....... ............. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes .................................................."..............................................................................-...............................,..................................... ......................."................... CATEGORY: BUDGET Il\1P ACT: .x CONSENT _ORDINANCE _BUSINESS HEARING FYI _RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT _PROCLAMATION _STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ..................................................,.......................................................................,..................................................,......................... .........................".................. ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes - Federal Way City Council Regular Mtg. - December 16, 1997. ................................................................................."....................................................................................................,................ ..............."........................... SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Written minutes required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) ........................................,.............................................................,............................................................,................................... .........................,.........,......... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approval of minutes as presented. ....................,..................................................,...........................................................................................,................................... ...............,........"""""""""'" ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~.~~~~~~ ~ ~ :~~~~o~~.~~~:~t~s.~~~ ~~:~~~ <. ~ ~~~~D FOr-S~~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CIlY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: _APPROVED DENIED TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # I:\agenda.bil DRAFT FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Council Chambers - City Hall December 16, 1997 - 7:00 p.m. MINUTES I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Priest opened the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council at 7:05 p.m., in Council Chambers, City Hall, Federal Way, Washington. City Council present: Mayor Mahlon "Skip" Priest, Deputy Mayor Hope Elder; Councilmembers Michael Park, Ron Gintz and Phil Watkins, Jack Dovey and Mal)' Gates. City Staff present: City Manager Ken Nyberg, Deputy City Manager Philip Keightley, City Attorney Londi Lindell, City Clerk Chris Green and Deputy City Clerk Bob Baker. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cub Scout Pack 361 led the flag salute. III. PRESENTATIONS a. Public Safety Department RecognitionlNehlhborhood Safety Program Deputy Mayor Elder read a Certificate of Recognition presented to the Department of Public Safety. The Washington State Traffic Safety Commission has recognized the department with its "Creative Solutions" award for the Neighborhood Speed Watch Program. Chief Wood accepted the Certificate; and in turn, he recognized Lt. Andy Hwang and Community Resources Manager Brooke Owen. Chief Wood also recognized and expressed appreciation for the partnership efforts of those who volunteer on the Neighborhood Speed Watch Program. Lt. Hwang thanked the Council and the volunteers. He especially thanked Chief Wood for his leadership and vision. He noted the volunteers for the Speed Watch program have donated over 750 hours. b. Weyerhaeuser - Special Presentation - Celebration Park Mayor Priest introduced Creigh Agnew, Vice President of Government Affairs and Corporate Contributions. He then asked Parks Commission member Laird Chambers and Celebration Park Funding Committee co-chairs Sarbara Reid and Dini Duclos to come forward for a special presentation. Ms. Agnew announced the donation of$50,000.00 by the Weyerhaeuser Company toward the development of Celebration Park. She presented a check to Councilmember Dovey and remarked she was especially thankful for Celebration Park as she is a Federal Way resident and has children who will benefit ITom its use. " CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 16,1997 - PAGE 2 Councilmember Dovey then presented a plaque to Ms. Agnew recognizing the generous contribution from the Weyerhaeuser Corporation. IV. CITIZEN COMMENT Dietrick Jones thanked the Council for approving use of Fishers Bog property and sought volunteers to assist the Federal Way Historical Society. Martin Barnes spoke in opposition to the proposed Pacific Place Condominiums~ King County Building Permit #B97CO270. This property is near the proposed area of annexation - Applewood. Harry Horan spoke of his general support of the nonconformance code amendments. He did, however, express concern relative to changes of use. He felt compliance will be next to impossible for some. Alison Corrigan spoke on the unallocated utility tax funds. The Chamber of Commerce, through Alison, expressed its appreciation for the investment in the downtown revitalization program. They are, however, concerned with the recent allocations to further fund the Knutzen Family Theatre and Celebration park. They have urged the Council to place the remaining unallocated funds into the downtown revitalization program. Dan Casey spoke extensively on the proposed nonconformance code amendments. Two areas of concern are the frontage improvement section and the water quality section. He proposed his own changes to the code for Council's consideration. V. CONSENT AGENDA c. d. e. f g. h. Minutes/December 2. 1997 Rewlar Meeting & December 8. 1997 Special Meeting "ouchernDecemberI6.1997 Monthly Financial Report/October 1997 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Motor" ehicle Excise Tax Grant Community Development Block Grant Automated Fingerprint Identification System Grant So. 3361hlKitts Regional Storage Facility Repair/Final Acceptance Celebration ParklMemorandum of Understanding 1. J. k. Councilmember Gates MOVED APPRO" AL OF ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS AS PRESENTED~ second by Councilmember Gintz. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes yes yes yes yes CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 1997 - PAGE 3 VI. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS Celebration Park Bid Award a. CouncilmemberDoveyMOVED APPROVAL TO AWARD THE CELEBRATION PARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO STAN PALMER CONSTRUCTION, INC., THE APP ARENT LOWEST RESPONSIVE RESPONSffiLE LOW BIDDER, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF EIGHT SPORTS FIELDS, NORTH ROAD, PARKING LOTS, TRAILS AND BRIDGES, WETLAND MITIGATION AND SITE WORK, 9TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS FOR $6,721,146 INCLUDING SALES TAX, AND TO ADVANCE $320,000 OF THE UNALLOCATED UTILITY TAX FUNDS TO THE PROJECT; second by Deputy Mayor Elder. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes no yes b. American Janitorial Services Amendment Councilmember Gintz MOVED APPROV AL TO EXECUTE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE JANITORIAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICES; second by Councilmember Park. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes c. King Conservation DistrictlResolution APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 97-263 Councilmember Dovey MOVED APPROVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE A PETITION FOR EXCLUSION OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FROM THE KING COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT; second by Deputy Mayor Elder. Discussion ensued. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 16,1997 - PAGE 4 The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes Councilmember Park MOVED APPROVAL TO ADD ITEM (d) - HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION APPOINTMENT; second by Deputy Mayor Elder. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes Mayor Priest MOVED APPROVAL TO ADD ITEM (e) - CITY MANAGER'S EVALUATION; second by Councilmember Gates. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes d. Human Services Commission Appointment Councilmember Park MOVED APPROVAL TO APPOINT CURRENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION ALTERNATE DARREN PASCHKE TO FILL THE VACANCY CREATED WITH THE RESIGNATION OF TOSKA RODRIQUEZ; second by Deputy Mayor Elder. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey "- yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes e. City Manager Evaluation Mayor Priest cited several awards and accomplishments of City Manager Nyberg over the last two years such as: -City Manager Award - Intergovernmental Coordination - 1996 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 1997 - PAGE 5 -City Manager Award - Excellence for Management - 1996 -City Manager Award - Excellence in Police Implementation - 1997 Councilmember Gintz MOVED APPROVAL TO AWARD CITY MANAGER NYBERG A ONE-TIME $7,800.00 PERFORMANCE PAYMENT FOR 1997; approximately 8% of his yearly salary. His base salary is to remain the same for 1998. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Dovey. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes VII. ORDINANCES a. Council Bill #181/Non-Conforming Code AmendmentsÆnactment Ordinance/APPROVED ORDINANCE # 97-307 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTERS 16 AND 22 OF THE FEDERAL WAY CITY CODE, PERTAINING TO LAND USE AND ZONING, ADOPTING NEW DEFINITIONS, REVISING EXISTING NONCONFORMANCE PROVISIONS AND CONSOLIDATING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS INTO THE NONCONFORMANCE, ARTICLE IV OF CHAPTER 22. Deputy City Clerk Baker conducted second reading of the ordinance. COUNCll.,MEMBER WATKINS MOVED TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS APPROVED AT THE LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE LEVEL; second by Councilmember Dovey. Discussion followed. Councilmember Gates moved to amend the main motion by AMENDING THE ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE PROPOSED CHANGES BY STAFF SUCH AS REFINEMENT OF TERM "STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT," INCLUSION OF GROSS FLOOR AREA WITHIN DEFINITION OF "REDEVELOPMENT" AND CORRESPONDING TRIGGER, INCLUSION OF "CHANGE OF USE INTRODUCING NEW POLLUTANTS" WITHIN "DEVELOPMENT," CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF "CHANGE OF USE," PROVISION FOR INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUSION OF REPLACEMENT OF STRUCTURE WITHIN "REDEVELOPMENT" DEFINITION AND USE OF MAPS, DATA OR WRITTEN POLICIES; second by Councilmember Gintz. Public Works Director Carr Roe gave an overview of the proposed revisions (by staff). He also paraphrased Mr. Casey's earlier comments and addressed concerns regarding the water quality thresh hold trigger. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 16,1997 - PAGE 6 " Further discussion ensued. The motion to amend carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes The main motion, as amended carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes b. Council Bill #187/Civil Services Code AmendmentlIntroduction Ordinance AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCil.. OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CIVil.. SERVICE AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT AND EXCLUDING FROM CIVil.. SERVICE THE RANK OF POLICE COMMANDER (AMENDS ORDINANCES 95-244 & 96-258) Deputy City Clerk Bob Baker read Council Bill #187. Deputy Mayor Elder moved AFPROV AL TO FORWARD COUNCIL BILL #187 TO JANUARY 6, 1998, FOR SECOND READINGÆNACTMENT; second by Councilmember Dovey. The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes Council Bill #188/Subdivision Code AmendmentslIntroduction Ordinance c. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCil.. OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE FEDERAL WAY SUBDMSION CODE, ADOPTING SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS AND ADDING NEW REGULATIONS FOR CLUSTER SUBDMSIONS. Deputy City Clerk Bob Baker read Council Bill #188. Deputy Mayor Elder moved APPROVAL TO FORWARD COUNCIL BILL #188 TO JANUARY 6,1998, FOR SECOND READINGÆNACTMENT; second by Councilmember Dovey. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 16,1997 - PAGE 7 The motion carried as follows: Priest Gates Gintz Dovey yes yes yes yes Elder Watkins Park yes yes yes VIII. CITY MANAGER REPORT Mr. Nyberg reported the next Council meeting is on January 6, 1998. The City will have no official Mayor or Deputy Mayor until that meeting. Should some urgent matter arise, the senior member on the Council, Mary Gates, will be contacted and asked to serve in a Mayoral capacity. Deputy City Manager Keightley is slated to be away from City Hall until January 18, 1998. Finally, he noted Council Retreat is set for January 9 and 10, 1998. IX. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Gates reported the RTA budget passed last Thursday and noted the Federal Way Park & Ride is on "Fast Track" and we need to ensure our wishes for that project are in place. Other regional issues were briefly discussed. Councilmember Dovey reported a ground breaking/dedication ceremony at Celebration Park on Friday, December 19, 1997, at 12:00 p.m. Deputy Mayor Elder made no report. Councilmember Gintz made no report. Councilmember Watkins reported the Land Useffransportation Committee was "disbanded" until such time as a new Chair would be appointed in January. Councilmember Park noted the next Public Safety/Human Services Committee regular meeting is tentatively scheduled for January 8, 1998. CITY COUNCn. REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 16, 1997 - PAGE 8 x. ADJOURNMENT Having no other business to corne before the Council, Mayor Priest adjourned the regular meeting at 8:25 p.m. Robert H. Baker Deputy City Clerk ...~~.!.~.Q..!>.A~;..~~!1.~~~..~.'...!.~~~........................................._..~.~~-~~ ) """""""""""""""" CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: VOUCHER ." ..........",.... .....", """""""""""'........................................................",................. ...-..... ................ ........... .........................,..... ........ ....................., ........ ...... ...... CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: X CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARIN G FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMA TION STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ 2,238,302.68 Expenditure Amt: $ 2,238,302.68 Contingency Reqd: ....................................................................................".................................................................................................................. ,..................................",...... ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST ....................................................................................".................................................................................................................. ".......................................... SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor peñormed as descrihed herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of Federal Way, Washingto and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claims. TEE RECOMMENDATION: .., ~P. P.r..~! ~..~ !~~.I). ~.~..! ~.~ ~.I). ~.~. P.~. ~~ ~.~ t!~..~ ç.~.. ~~ :.~...................................................................... .............................................. ........"...... ... ~.~ ~~.. ~~.~~~~. ~~. ~.~~.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.................... ~....... ~ ~ ~.~. ¿~.....~.~.... J..~ ~ APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ~~ ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # ORDINANCE # FIRST READING ENACTMENT READ RESOLUTION # CCCQVER-Sf24/\)4 -. CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 09/09/97 11/20/97 11/20/97 11/24/97 11/24/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 f 09:29 CHECK # 136082 137493 137494 137495 137496 137500 137501 137502 137503 137504 137505 137506 137507 137508 137509 137510 137511 137512 137513 137514 137522 137523 137524 137525 137526 137527 VEND # 003386 001130 000065 000007 000016 000017 000027 000029 000033 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME RICK PEREZ LITA SIPPY TIM ROBINSON ROTARY OFFSET PRESS INC U S POSTMASTER DANA CLEANING SERVICE EDMUND JACOB BOB OLSEN AC-CORD ELECTRIC INC. MAUREEN BERRY JIMMY KIM GLENN SCHMIDT LINDA JARVIS DOLAN FERNANDEZ NATL.DIOCESAN LIAISON SYMP. RELOCATION NETWORK CONSULTANTS RENTON AREA YOUTH & FAMILY SVC KING COUNTY LITERACY COALITION ELCA/DCM DON KELLEY BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS PEGGY'S PLANT SERVICE ICBO-INT'L CONF BLDG OFFICIALS KING MARKING SYSTEMS FIRESAFE INC AMOUNT 834.42 10.00 93.75 4,218.00 2,176.00 25.00 700.00 70.00 55.00 5.00 31.12 30.00 11.00 40.00 449.00 60.00 50.00 125.00 18.01 40.00 7,203.97 262.27 105.00 32.00 245.41 170.48 PAGE 1 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT LOST CK #136091 REPLACEMENT REPL CK #130356 DTD 10/15/96 RECREATION BROCHURES PRINTING BULK MAIL/BUS REPLY PERMITS REIMBURSE HOA FEE/OUT OF CITY REFUND-CASH BOND: E. JACOB REFUND-CASH DEPOSIT: B. OLSEN REFUND:ELECTRICAL FIXTURES REFUND:REC CLASS REGISTRATION REFUND:REC CLASS REGISTRATIION REFUND: REC CLASS REGISTRATION REFUND:REC CLASS REGISTRATION REFUND: REC CLASS REGISTRATION DBC-REF DMG DPST & OVERPAY DBC-REF DMG DPST 10/17/97. DBC-DMG DPST REFUND DBC-DMG DPST REFUND 10/07/97 DBC-REF BAL DMG DPST 10/15-18 REFUND:REC CLASS REGISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT COPIES/FAX MACHINES MAINT/SUPP FACILITIES INDOOR PLANTS MAINT BUILDING FEES/PUBLICATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES/REPAIRS CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 t 09:29 CHECK # 137529 137531 137532 137533 137534 137535 137536 137537 137538 137539 137540 137541 137542 137543 137544 137545 137546 13 754 7 137548 137549 137550 137551 137552 137553 137554 137555 VEND # 000043 000051 000053 000056 000063 000065 000067 000075 000089 000096 000101 000104 000106 000109 000112 000125 000142 000163 000196 000201 000202 000204 000217 000223 000253 000309 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME AMOUNT NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY PUGET SOUND ENERGY 482.66 6,028.29 COMMUNITY NEWS GROUP 445.99 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER 541 . 89 CORPORATE EXPRESS 191. 94 U S POSTMASTER 104.00 WALDRON & COMPANY INC 7,951.00 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES 4,522.42 NEWS TRIBUNE 129.36 LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 1,880.63 119.93 PETTY CASH EDELINE M LOGREYRA 332.50 SELECT TRAVEL INC ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DBA) 518.68 370.34 PACIFIC COAST FORD INC 9,719.67 KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION 1,123.96 2,041.14 CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE TRAVEL KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 35,323.60 FORTE RENTALS INC 213.72 KINKO'S 39.79 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 10,283.99 4,056.21 SOFTWARE SPECTRUM FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 22.75 ITE 178.00 WA STATE-TRANSPORTATION DEPT 36.58 FINANCIAL SYSTEMS PRODUCTS 161.81 PAGE 2 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CITY FACILITIES ELECTRIC & GAS NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS PRINTING SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT BULK MAIL/BUS REPLY PERMITS COM DEV PLANS EXAMINER SERVICE CELLULAR PHONES AIR TIME NEWSPAPER ADS & SUBSCRIPTIONS CITY FACILITIES WATER & SEWER PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC AIRFARE FOR CITY BUSINESS TRVL FACILITIES LOCKSMITH SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES CITY BUSINESS TRAVEL EXPENSES DISTRICT COURT FILING FEES EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES PRINTING SERVICES CITY FACILITIES PHONE SERVICES COMPUTER SYSTEM SOFTWARE/MAINT DOCUMENTS EXPRESS DELIVERY SVC ITE ANNUAL ASSOCIATION DUES ROADS & ENGINEERING SERVICES MICROFICHE TONER SUPPLIES CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 09:29 CHECK # 137556 137557 137558 137559 137560 137561 137562 137563 137564 137565 137566 137567 137568 137569 137570 137571 137573 137574 137575 137576 137577 137578 137579 137580 137581 137582 VEND # 000328 000340 000343 000368 000376 000385 000414 000438 000469 000473 000479 000515 000518 000533 000560 000566 000570 000575 000621 000630 000694 000699 000714 000721 000724 000730 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVICES EVER CLEAN WASH INC PERKINS COlE KING COUNTY WATER & LAND DIV ACCOUNTEMPS CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONES WA STATE-DOL PROF LICENSES SVC VICKI NORRIS WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY KING COUNTY FIRE PROT DIST #39 SAFETY & SUPPLY COMPANY PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES INC FEDERAL WAY PTSA COUNCIL POPICH SIGN COMPANY EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA) ATTORNEYS INFORMATION BUREAU MELVYN E WOODS LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE COMPANY MUNICIPAL RESEARCH & SERVICES SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY AMERICAN CONCRETE INC HOME GUARD SECURITY SYSTEMS ENTRANCO AMOUNT 4,010.52 1,210.55 461.18 203.65 15,270.64 1,059.79 3,630.51 42.71 96.00 128.93 45.00 9,425.00 395.80 736.31 1,800.58 60.27 2,474.85 40.00 83.27 39,475.47 70.43 15.00 36,012.90 834.05 82.90 29,076.49 PAGE 3 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION GASOLINE FOR CITY VEHICLES SCAN LONG DISTANCE SERVICE CAR WASHES FOR POLICE VEHICLES PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES SWM UTILITY BILLINGS/COLLECTNS TEMPORARY OFFICE HELP SERVICES DUMAS BAY CENTRE CATERING SVCS FOOD SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LICENSE CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT PUBLIC WORKS TRAINING COURSES CITY ID CARDS & FIRE PERMITS SAFETY SUPPLIES/CLOTHING PARKS GROUNDS MAINT SUPPLIES HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM PRINTED SIGNS & NAME PLATES VEHICLES MAINTENANCE & PARTS LAW INFORMATION RETAINER/SVCS PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES STREETS MAINT SVCS & SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES WA CITIES OFFICIALS DIRECTORY REC BALL SPORTS CAMP PROGRAMS CEMENT & SURFACING MATERIALS FACILITIES ALARM MONITORING ROADS IMPROVEMENT ENGINEERING ~ CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 t 09:29 CHECK # 137583 137584 137585 137586 137587 137588 137589 137590 137591 137592 137593 137594 137595 137596 137597 137598 137599 137600 137601 137602 137603 137604 137605 137606 137607 137608 VEND # 000732 000738 000748 000755 000799 000876 000914 000920 000939 000951 000954 001014 001025 001026 001037 001046 001061 001066 001079 001118 001131 001139 001240 001241 001250 001267 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME AMOUNT WASPC-WA ASSOC SHERIFFS & 55.00 G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY 364.80 HIGHLINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 119.00 ATTORNEY & NOTARY SUPPLY 85.00 JET CHEVROLET 833.57 FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC 183.72 ABOLINS AV PHOTOGRAPHICS PAPER DIRECT INC 40.20 61. 80 CULLYSPRING WATER COMPANY INC 176.94 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 1,241.35 517.43 DNB MAILING SERVICES SKCRA-SOCCER REFEREES ASSOC 3,150.00 PHOTO PRO (DBA) ALBERTSON'S FOOD CENTER #460 20.73 51. 36 KEY BANK VISA 2,129.99 16.00 EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SVC WA STATE-AGRICULTURE DEPARTMNT 25.00 BIG WHEEL AUTO PARTS SHRM-SOCIETY HUM RESOURCE MGNT 13.97 160.00 WA STATE-ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT 77.33 EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC 454.20 RED WING SHOE STORE 157.85 INRO CONSULTANTS INC 715.00 WEST COAST AWARDS 32.69 PACIFIC LASERS INC 127.32 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC 73.54 PAGE 4 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION WASPC FALL CONFERENCE/TRAINING SWM SAFETY CLOTHING COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING NOTARY SUPPLIES/SEMINARS FLEET REPAIR & MAINT PARTS PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT CAMERA FILM & SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK FACILITIES BOTTLED WATER RETAINAGE HELD FOR CONTRACTS RECYCLING FLYERS MAILING SVCS REC SOCCER LEAGUES REFEREE SVC PHOTOS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOOD SUPPLIES FOR CITY EVENTS CITY BUSINESS EXPENSES POLICE EMPLOYMT CREDIT REPORTS PESTICIDE LICENSES RENEWAL SUPPLIES FOR CITY VEHICLES SHRM ANNUAL ASSOCIATION DUES ECOLOGY INFORMATION PUBLICATNS CITY VEHICLES REPAIR SERVICES UNIFORM SAFETY FOOTWEAR TRANSPORTATION SOFTWARE COURSE UNIFORM CLOTHING ITEMS/SUPPLY POLICE PAINT SUPPLIES RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 09:29 CHECK # 137609 137610 137611 137612 137613 137614 137615 137616 137617 137618 137619 137620 137621 137622 137623 137624 137626 137627 137628 137629 137630 137631 137632 137633 137634 137635 VEND # 001285 001297 001305 001336 001367 001377 001411 001427 001431 001470 001472 001481 001552 001575 001612 001629 001630 001666 001673 001681 001732 001806 001843 001879 001902 001938 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME AMOUNT ALPINE PRODUCTS INC FINANCIAL MAINTENANCE CORP 121.46 289.97 ACE FIRE & SECURITY SYSTEMS 280.73 LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC 1, 134 .94 HDR ENGINEERING INC 1,834.99 PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL PIPE INC 628.72 POSTAL EXPRESS INC 869.00 WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT M A SEGALE INC 92.26 588.73 ALLTEL SUPPLY INC 66.29 DICK'S CAMERA & VIDEO 277.05 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 3,396.96 PETTY CASH-KLCC REC DEPT 79.54 P C COMPUTING 16.94 THE POLLARD GROUP INC 83.57 HUSKY-HANK'S TREE SERVICE 1,197.82 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 2,047.21 155.97 R & D SUPPLY INC ENUMCLAW QUARRY INC CAMPUS CAFE 181.55 126.02 HANSEN COMMUNICATIONS INC 80.00 RENTAL FENCE SERVICE 902.74 MORRIS PIHA MANAGEMENT GROUP 1,937.33 6,679.48 EARTH TECH MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE BURNER & CONTROL SERVICES 1,606.19 269.33 PAGE 5 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPLIES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES ALARM SYSTEM REPAIR PHONE SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE 356TH ST WIDENING PROJ DESIGN SWM REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES MAIL METERING & COURIER SVCS EQUIPMENT REPAIRS & SUPPLIES ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJECT TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT POLICE CAMERA EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SVCS PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT P C COMPUTING PUBLICATIONS PRINTING SERVICES REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS TREES POLICE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES CITY BLDGS MAINT SUPPLIES SWM ROCK & MATERIALS FOOD SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS SWM AFTER HOURS ANSWERING SVCS TEMPORARY FENCING RENTAL CITY/POLICE FACILITIES LEASE CONTRACTED ENGINEERING SVCS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FACILITIES FURNACES REPAIR ~ CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 l' 09:29 CHECK # 137636 137637 137638 137639 137640 137641 137642 137643 137644 137645 137646 137647 137648 137649 137650 137651 137652 137653 137654 137655 137656 137657 137658 137659 137660 137661 VEND # 001969 001988 001990 001998 002010 002014 002024 002044 002073 002119 002137 002241 002263 002328 002332 002363 002426 002454 002501 002521 002523 002544 002545 002547 002548 002644 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME MAT R W SCOTT CONSTRUCTION CO INC KCM INC MOORE BUSINESS SOLUTION DIRECT PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY INC VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER COMMERCIAL OFFICE INTERIORS INLAND FOUNDRY COMPANY INC SALVATION ARMY 3H CABLE COMMUNICATIONS TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES FEDERAL WAY PRINTING RAINBOW CONNECTION CHILDCARE UNITED GROCERS INC COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION SHOPE CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO INC SUPERLON PLASTICS COMPANY R & L TRUCKING & CONSTRUCTION HYUNDAI FOOD PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC W W GRAINGER INC SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL FEDERAL WAY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB AMOUNT 11.95 54.72 59.46 318,729.20 1,020.28 1,432.97 202.18 845.97 237.00 56.47 884.54 1,265.93 2,500.00 7,000.00 635.74 1,320.00 33.19 50.00 520.32 84.34 4,714.63 166.53 1,037.40 1,247.44 86.88 2,250.00 PAGE 6 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION KING COUNTY ZONING CODE BOOK KLCC KITCHEN LINEN SERVICES KLCC RENTAL MAT SERVICES 336TH STREET WIDENING PROJECT SWM 356TH FACILITY PROJECT PRINTING SERVICES DISTRICT COURT WITNESSES FEES WORK CREWS SAFETY SUPPLIES POLICE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS HARDWARE FOR OFFICE CABINETS SWM/PKM DRAIN COVERS & GRATES HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM CABLE TV CONSULTANT SERVICES DBC FIRE SERVICE DEPOSIT PRINTING SERVICES CDBG CARES PROGRAM SERVICES RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES SWM DRIVERS SKILLS TEST FEES SWM CONCRETE SUPPLIES SWM PIPE & SUPPLIES SAND FOR STREETS SANDING KLCC KOREAN LUNCHES SUPPLIES FACILITIES HVAC SYSTEM SVCS SWM/PARKS MAINT EQUIPMENT/SUPP FACILITIES PEST CONTROL SVCS HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM . CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 09:29 CHECK # 137662 137663 137664 137665 137666 137667 137668 137669 137670 137671 137672 137673 137674 137675 137676 137677 137678 137679 137680 137681 137682 137683 137684 137685 137686 137687 VEND # 002672 002787 002790 002798 002804 002826 002853 002871 002892 002899 002924 002959 003035 003039 003043 003085 003093 003111 003118 003173 003209 003212 003220 003225 003236 003258 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME MCGRAW-HILL INC OFFICE PRODUCT LIQUIDATORS INC CONSTRUCTION TESTING LABS INC HANNA NGUYEN IDENTIGRAPHICS INC KASSEL CONSTRUCTION INC 25 MINUTE PHOTO CHAE HYON CHO LYNCH CREEK QUARRY ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES INC THE ST PAUL CALDERON TEXTILES INC GUIDANCE SERVICES INC RONALD T WOOD OLEG K STEKLAR TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP CASCADE COMPUTER MAINTENANCE NATIONAL MAINT CONTRACTORS INC GALL'S INC HYDROSEEDING INC WASHINGTON POLYGRAPH BRIAN PEARSON KATHLEEN RORK POLLOCK PHD URS GREINER INC QFC COUNTER ASSAULT AMOUNT 76.89 781. 59 562.70 52.50 170.22 297,081.60 215.46 30.00 1,347.98 479.39 638.75 495.00 450.00 1,597.76 50.00 4,789.26 290.51 707.00 252.96 352.95 125.00 85.00 235.00 10,669.30 66.81 316.50 PAGE 7 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION PUBLIC WORKS PUBLICATIONS POLICE OFFICE FURNITURE ASPHALT & SOIL TESTING SVCS DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC SIGN INVENTORY SUPPLIES KNUTSEN FAMILY THEATRE PROJECT PRINTING/PHOTO SERVICES DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC ROCKS FOR SWM USE WETLAND BIOLOGIST SERVICES VEHICLE CLAIM SETTLEMENT DUMAS BAY ROOM SUPPLIES LAW DEPT OFFICE TEMP SERVICES POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENTS DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC COMPUTER EQUIPMENT LASER PRINTERS MAINTENANCE FACILITIES JANITORIAL SERVICE POLICE BINOCULARS HYDROSEEDING FOR SWM MAINT POLICE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPHS CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT POLICE EMPLOYMENT EVALUATIONS ROAD WIDENING PROJ ENGINEERING FOOD SUPPLIES FOR CITY EVENTS POLICE FIREARMS EQUIPMENT CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 09:29 CHECK # 137688 137689 137690 137691 137692 137693 137694 137695 137696 137697 137698 137699 137700 137701 137702 137703 137704 137705 137706 137707 137708 137709 137710 137711 137712 137713 . VEND # 003259 003270 003277 003302 003340 003341 003352 003376 003391 003414 003466 003469 003472 003500 003532 003536 003563 003589 003726 003736 003766 003786 003829 003831 003874 003893 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INT INC SEBRIS BUSTO PS HAMRE/DASHNEA PROLINE INDUSTRIES INC DAVID H SMITH PHD KING COUNTY FINANCE DEPT MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ALEX KIRICHENKO CRAFT OUTLET PROMEDIX DBA LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY INC ROAD WARRIORS INC RATELCO COMMUNICATION SVC INC WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS BUCKLEY NURSERY COMPANY INC ERGO & HEALTH NETWORK VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES SAFEWAY STORE #351 NORTHWEST TOWING INC TUCCI & SONS INC UNIV OF CALIF-BERKELEY EXTENSN PRO JET POWER INC GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES MCHUGH PROPERTIES PORTER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION AMOUNT 211 . 00 421.35 140.00 166.22 575.00 31.00 89.48 70.00 39.42 5.97 447.95 344.88 51.04 108.60 561.36 422.45 86,154.50 88.00 36.49 91.23 555.95 195.00 54.80 250.00 1,526.00 51,445.45 PAGE 8 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION POLICE DEPT EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES POLICE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH AUDIO/VIDEO SALES POLICE CONSULTATION SERVICES KING COUNTY BLDG PARKING FEES POLICE EQUIPMENT DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES POLICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE FINGERPRINT/SUPPLIES TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES POLICE RADIO REPAIR DISTRICT COURT RADAR EXPERT SPORTS FIELD RENOVATION OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT POLICE EMERGENCY DISPATCH SVCS POLICE MEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL FOOD/SUPPLY POLICE CEREMONIES VEHICLE TOWING FOR POLICE ROAD SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPL ROADWAY LIGHTING SEMINAR PARTS FOR PUMPS/GENERATORS POLICE POLYGRAPH SERVICES SPACE LEASE FOR POLICE USE S 356TH ST STORAGE/STREAM PRJT CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 DATE 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 11/26/97 t 09:29 CHECK # 137714 137715 137716 137717 137718 137719 137720 137721 137722 137723 137724 137725 137726 137727 137728 137729 137730 137731 137732 137733 137734 137735 137736 137737 137738 137739 VEND # 003894 003930 003955 003968 003972 003977 003983 004051 004083 004084 004106 004110 004123 004124 004125 004128 004131 004134 004135 004137 004141 004144 004145 004146 004147 004148 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON BARNETT IMPLEMENT INC OHANA NURSERY VAN PELT, CORBETT & ASSOCIATES CINDY WALTON KEY BANK VISA SEAFIRST BANK MUCK CREEK CONSTRUCTION APWA-AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS COUNTRY GREEN FARMS LAYFIELD PLASTICS INC ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH SVCS STAR NEW TRIBE BAVARIAN AUTOHAUS MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERNATIONAL NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER GLAS DOCTOR-SEATTLE POLYGLOT TRANSLATION SERVICES GODFATHER'S PIZZA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT MICROTRANS INC PIERCE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS FRONTIER BANK-LAKE CITY SEAFIRST BANK AMOUNT 5,026.55 135.68 25,197.94 251. 00 15.30 1,393.76 16,775.22 519.11 45.00 13,272.80 768.08 760.00 21. 50 201.82 334.93 250.87 595.00 499.55 50.00 50.15 11.50 271.50 69.00 62.28 14,337.91 6,558.13 PAGE 9 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION PORTER BROS CONST RETAINAGE SWM MOWER REPAIRS/PARTS LK GROVE SPORTS FIELD PROJECT COURT REPORTER SERVICES ENTERTAINMENT FOR FALL CARNIVL POLICE BUSINESS TRAVEL EXPENSE R W SCOTT CONSTRUCTN RETAINAGE S 336 STORAGE FACILITY REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLICATIONS TURF GRASS/MARK TWAIN BALLFLD GEO-SYNTHETICS MFR/SUPPLIES DIVERSITY COMMISSION RETREAT PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PARK LANDSCAPE TOOLS POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS PRINTING SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS SEMINARS POLICE VEHICLE GLASS REPAIRS DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC SPECIAL POPULATIONS OUTTING PUBLIC WORKS LAND PUBLICATIONS CLEANING STORM LINES SOFTWARE PROGRAMS STORMWATER MGMT/DEVELOP MANUAL KNUTZEN FAM THEATRE RETAINAGE RETAINAGE FOR BUCKLEY NURSERY CHEKREG2 DATE 11/26/97 09:29 DATE CHECK # VEND # 11/26/97 137740 004149 NAME CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER TOTAL CHECKS LMI OFFICE SUPPLY JOB WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AMOUNT 101. 36 1,186,479.01 Y PAGE 10 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION NOTARY OFFICE SUPPLIES , ~ CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 09 :40 DATE CHECK # VEND # 12/15/97 137744 12/15/97 137745 12/15/97 137746 12/15/97 137747 12/15/97 137748 12/15/97 137749 12/15/97 137750 12/15/97 137751 12/15/97 137752 12/15/97 137753 12/15/97 137754 12/15/97 137755 12/15/97 137756 12/15/97 137757 12/15/97 137758 12/15/97 137759 12/15/97 137760 12/15/97 137761 12/15/97 137762 12/15/97 137763 12/15/97 137764 12/15/97 137765 12/15/97 137766 12/15/97 137767 12/15/97 137768 12/15/97 137769 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME HYUNDAI ST VINCENT DE PAUL CARY LANG CONSTRUCTION DEREK PURTON DAVID BILYEU WENDY SCHONWETTER MEO FEROY SALL Y RAMOS WASHINGTON LIBRARY ASSOCIATION JANIS L BERRY CORWIN A BROWN KIMBERLY DAWN CHANDLER RUDOLPH DOBROWITS MARJORIE M FINEDORE MARION L FITZPATRICK KATHRYN H GIFT ROGER A JOHNSON BERYL JONES JAMES F LUMA ILLA M MADEN JOAN MAY MAJESTIC KELLY E MCKENZIE KAREN J MILLER JUDITH A MUSIC ROBERT LEE OLSON JAMES M PETE AMOUNT 1,103.00 11,528.00 460.60 15.00 39.00 39.00 32.00 500.00 631.65 12.60 11.56 26.24 13 .12 10.52 12.08 37.80 24.16 22.60 12.34 11.30 12.08 24.16 11.04 12.08 37.02 12.08 PAGE 1 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION REFUND-CASH BOND: HYUNDAI REFUND-CASH BOND: ST VINCENT'S REFUND- CASH BOND: CLANG CONST REFUND: REC CLASS REGISTRATION REFUND: REC CLASS REGISTRATIOM REFUND: REC CLASS REGISTRATIOM REFUND:REC CLASS REGISTRATION REFUND:DAMAGE DEPOSIT DBC-DMG DPST & OVERPAYMENT LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 137770 137771 137772 137773 137774 137775 137776 137777 137778 137779 137780 137781 137784 137785 137786 137787 137788 137789 137790 137791 137792 137793 137794 137795 137796 137797 VEND # 000007 000008 000014 000016 000027 000029 000033 000043 000049 000051 000053 000055 000063 000070 000075 000089 000096 000101 000104 000109 000125 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME ROBERT LEE POPE NANCY MARIE PUCKETT EVELYN L REITAN JONELLE MCCANN RIVIERA ALAN AGARDI BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS BOOK PUBLISHING COMPANY INC DAY-TIMERS INC IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS ICBO-INT'L CONF BLDG OFFICIALS KING MARKING SYSTEMS FIRESAFE INC NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP PUGET SOUND ENERGY COMMUNITY NEWS GROUP SEATTLE TIMES CORPORATE EXPRESS PUGET SOUND ENERGY AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES NEWS TRIBUNE LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PETTY CASH EDELINE M LOGREYRA ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DBA) KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION AMOUNT 12.08 26.24 12.86 11.56 11.56 147.58 38.01 105.40 2,605.15 210.00 81.29 14 .63 698.45 3,012.25 6,571.92 914.60 1,323.16 175.35 1,292.68 1,892.21 416.66 1,062.06 339.11 481. 25 129.01 75,333.52 PAGE 2 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 LAW-JUROR FEE WEEK OF 11/10/97 OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT PUBLICATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES COPIES/FAX MACHINES MAINT/SUPP BUILDING RESISTANCE SEMINAR OFFICE SUPPLIES SAFETY SUPPLIES/REPAIRS REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES CITY FACILITIES ELECTRIC & GAS NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT CITY FACILITIES ELECTRIC & GAS CELLULAR PHONES AIR TIME NEWSPAPER ADS & SUBSCRIPTIONS CITY FACILITIES WATER & SEWER PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC FACILITIES LOCKSMITH SERVICES INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 13 7798 137799 137800 137801 137803 137804 137805 137806 137807 137808 137809 137810 137811 137812 137813 137814 137815 137816 137817 137818 137819 137820 137821 137822 137823 137824 VEND # 000142 000161 000168 000196 000201 000202 000217 000229 000267 000286 000303 000308 000328 000332 000340 000351 000385 000412 000414 000423 000428 000432 000438 000475 000479 000504 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME AMOUNT CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE TRAVEL 1,028.90 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES 484.84 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE INC FORTE RENTALS INC 826.65 89.05 KINKO'S 1,468.40 374.66 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 6.50 FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERCE 480.00 KING COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT 544.00 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES 32.84 WAPELRA 150.00 SUBURBAN CITIES ASSOCIATION 275.00 ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA) 3,608.75 71.50 ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVICES 973.69 SEATTLE TIMES-SUBSCRIPTIONS 167.05 ACCOUNTEMPS 630.51 ROUND TABLE PIZZA 62.34 CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC 5,834.28 1,890.00 PERSONNEL RESOURCE CONSULTING WRPA-WA REC & PARK ASSOC 100.00 TAYLOR RENTAL 710.59 DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONES 176.05 CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS 162.74 WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY 760.18 ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER 460.20 PAGE 3 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION CITY BUSINESS TRAVEL EXPENSES OFFICE TEMPORARY HELP SERVICES NEWSPAPER LEGAL NOTICES EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES PRINTING SERVICES CITY FACILITIES PHONE SERVICES DOCUMENTS EXPRESS DELIVERY SVC CHAMBER DIRECTORY AD/LUNCHEONS POLICE BLDGS LEASE PAGERS MONTHLY SERVICE MEMBERSHIP DUES SCA DINNER MEETINGS GASOLINE FOR CITY VEHICLES LEGAL MESSENGER SERVICES SCAN LONG DISTANCE SERVICE NEWSPAPER SUBCRIPTION TEMPORARY OFFICE HELP SERVICES FOOD FOR CITY MEETINGS DUMAS BAY CENTRE CATERING SVCS CONSULTING & REPORT SERVICES MEMBERSHIP DUES EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOOD SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS ALARM MONITORING & SERVICES PESTICIDE TRAINING COURSE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPLIES CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09 :40 CHECK # 137825 137826 137827 137828 137829 137830 137831 137832 137833 137834 137835 137836 137837 137838 137839 137840 137841 137842 137843 137844 137845 137846 137847 137848 137849 137850 VEND # 000514 000515 000533 000541 000564 000570 000621 000630 000654 000713 000721 000723 000754 000771 000783 000790 000792 000799 000808 000891 000894 000914 000920 000923 000939 000947 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME WA STATE-STATE REVENUES KING COUNTY FIRE PROT DIST #39 PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES INC WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS KING COUNTY PET LICENSE EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA) MELVYN E WOODS LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC SEARS CASCADE PRINTING COMPANY AMERICAN CONCRETE INC SOUND RESOURCE MGMT GROUP INC OXYGEN SALES & SERVICE INC COST CO FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL CO INC SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER BARRY'S TRUCKING & LANDSCAPING JET CHEVROLET PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN SHEPARD'S/MCGRAW-HILL INC ABOLINS AV PHOTOGRAPHICS PAPER DIRECT INC FURNEY'S NURSERY INC CULLYSPRING WATER COMPANY INC SQUEEGEE CLEAN WINDOW CLEANING AMOUNT 41,379.53 21. 00 489.10 240.44 385.00 1,949.51 46.00 29,894.65 716.75 281.41 260.64 616.40 28.67 805.74 773.13 141.70 1,058.85 505.66 18.54 617.85 978.13 40.14 57.90 152.41 75.20 2,390.00 PAGE 4 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION STATE COURT FEES COLLECTED CITY ID CARDS & FIRE PERMITS PARKS GROUNDS MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS EQUIPMENT REPAIRS PET LICENSE FEES COLLECTED VEHICLES MAINTENANCE & PARTS PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES STREETS MAINT SVCS & SUPPLIES DUMAS BAY REFRIGERATOR PRINTING SERVICES CEMENT & SURFACING MATERIALS SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE REVIEW WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES RECYCLING DISPOSAL SERVICES NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION REPAIR SERVICES FLEET REPAIR & MAINT PARTS ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLY OFFICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES LAW REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS CAMERA FILM & SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PLANTS FOR PARKS & R/D PONDS PARK FACILITIES BOTTLED WATER FACILITIES JANITORIAL SERVICES CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 137851 137852 137853 137854 137855 137856 137857 137858 137859 137860 137861 137862 137863 137864 137865 137866 137867 137868 137869 137870 137871 137872 137873 137874 137875 137876 VEND # 000951 000977 000984 000991 001004 001015 001025 001028 001048 001052 001061 001086 001099 001109 001124 001130 001160 001189 001208 001233 001241 001254 001259 001267 001277 001297 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME AMOUNT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 967.47 MEASUREMENT RESEARCH CORP 3,800.00 MUZAK LTD PARTNERSHIP 129.72 CASCADE COFFEE INC 195.33 MAILMEDIA INC 381.01 REI INC 850.34 PHOTO PRO (DBA) JET CITIES CHORUS 29.46 1,532.53 SANDERSON SAFETY SUPPLY CO 554.82 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 57.53 WA STATE-AGRICULTURE DEPARTMNT KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER 25.00 139.00 KITS CAMERAS 433.69 SMITH TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 74.18 405.75 ROTARY OFFSET PRESS INC 5,930.67 KUKER-RANKEN INC 34.21 PETTY CASH 192.36 WA STATE-GENERAL ADMIN DEPT 90.00 AT & T BUSINESS SERVICE 26.69 WEST COAST AWARDS 93.61 WA STATE-SURPLUS PROPERTY 170.00 KING COUNTY CRIME VICTIMS FUND 745.38 TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC 314.70 MARY FABER FINANCIAL MAINTENANCE CORP 358.22 139.01 PAGE 5 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION RETAINAGE HELD FOR CONTRACTS PAVEMENT SOFTWARE MAINT SVCS CC CHAMBERS MICROPHONE REPAIR COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS ARTS COMMISSION MAILING SVCS PARKS & RECREATION EQUIPMENT PHOTOS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CHORUS DIRECTING/COACHING FEES SAFETY EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES FLEET REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES PESTICIDE LICENSES RENEWAL TRAINING SEMINAR CAMERA SUPPLIES/FILM DEVELPMNT PARKS/SWM EQUIP RENTAL/REPAIRS CELLULAR PHONES SERVICES RECREATION BROCHURES PRINTING SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS POLICE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT LONG DISTANCE PHONE SERVICES UNIFORM CLOTHING ITEMS/SUPPLY POLICE EQUIPMENT COURT FEES COLLECTED RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 137877 137878 137879 137881 137882 137883 137884 137885 137886 137887 137888 137889 137890 137891 137892 137893 137894 137896 137897 137898 137899 137900 137901 137902 137903 137904 VEND # 001299 001307 001315 001390 001431 001435 0014 72 001478 001481 001485 001512 001525 001545 001552 001572 001593 001612 001630 001666 001673 001686 001716 001802 001843 001856 001858 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME AMOUNT FORD GRAPHICS 4,214.60 55.80 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER LTD MOUNTAIN MIST WATER 332.34 EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN 009859 1,522.23 3,118.75 M A SEGALE INC DEBRA THOMAS 337.38 DICK'S CAMERA & VIDEO 27.95 GEOLINE POSITIONING SYSTEMS 58.11 CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC 27,321. 59 1,377.66 CHILDRENS WORLD ADVENTURE CLUB URESCO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 276.63 3CMA 145.00 C D LAW 54.30 PETTY CASH-KLCC REC DEPT 103.80 WA STATE-LICENSING DEPARTMENT FEDERAL WAY TOWING (DBA) 4,143.00 101. 27 THE POLLARD GROUP INC 1,922.80 5,764.21 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC R & D SUPPLY INC 104.39 ENUMCLAW QUARRY INC FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MACHINES 376.81 316.28 B J & SONS 740.03 PACIFIC ELECTRONICS INC 910.44 MORRIS PIHA MANAGEMENT GROUP 14,823.54 ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION 18,856.35 544.75 ABLE SPIFFY BIFFY PAGE 6 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION PRINTING SERVICES KOREAN INTERPRETER SERVICES CITY HALL/POLICE BOTTLED WATER MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPLIES ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJECT EDUCATION ASSISTANCE REIMBURMT POLICE CAMERA EQUIPMENT PW/PKM TOOLS & SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SVCS CDBG CARES PROGRAM SERVICES PARKS MAINT/REPAIR SUPPLIES CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES WASHINGTON STATUTES UPDATES PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT MINOR WORK PERMIT RENEWAL FEE VEHICLE TOWING SVC FOR POLICE PRINTING SERVICES POLICE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES CITY BLDGS MAINT SUPPLIES SWM ROCK & MATERIALS COPIER REPAIR, MAINT, SUPPLIES FACILITIES REPAIRS & MAINT SVC RADIO EQUIPMENT & SERVICES CITY/POLICE FACILITIES LEASE SWM VACUUM/JET RODDING SVCS PARKS SANITATION RENTAL CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 137905 137906 137907 137908 137909 137910 137911 137912 137913 137914 137915 137916 137917 137918 137919 137920 137921 137922 137923 137924 137925 137926 137927 137928 137929 137930 VEND # 001879 001902 001936 001988 001998 002010 002024 002038 002044 002057 002073 002087 002107 002148 002159 002231 002290 002363 002366 002379 002399 002405 002426 002544 002545 002557 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME EARTH TECH MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE PAGENET SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY R W SCOTT CONSTRUCTION CO INC KCM INC PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES WEST COAST BUSINESS FORMS PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY INC CATHLEEN CHANG VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER WHITMAN & ASSOCIATES INC COMPUSERVE INCORPORATED MAYHEW - FROEHLING ATTORNEYS INTERNATIONAL FESTIVALS ASSOC SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC REDONDO HEIGHTS TOWING RAINBOW CONNECTION INC ESM INC PACIFIC TOPSOILS INC RECOGNITION PLUS M LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS LLC UNITED GROCERS INC HYUNDAI FOOD PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT AMOUNT 5,553.00 7,862.42 663.31 82.08 116,286.86 49,285.06 238.14 1,053.26 97.74 225.00 253.00 389.00 9.95 821.72 95.00 725.40 646.72 1,342.75 810.45 870.59 975.60 127.00 213 . 84 121.05 521.74 183.16 PAGE 7 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION CONTRACTED ENGINEERING SVCS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES PAGERS LEASE & SERVICES KLCC KITCHEN LINEN SERVICES DBC PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJ SWM 356TH FACILITY PROJECT DISTRICT COURT WITNESSES FEES PRINTING SERVICES WORK CREWS SAFETY SUPPLIES DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC POLICE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS FACILITIES CARPET CLEANING SOFTWARE UPGRADES INFO/SUPPORT PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES MEMBERSHIP DUES WETLANDS BIOLOGIST SERVICES VEHICLE TOWING FOR POLICE CDBG CARES PROGRAM SERVICES STREETS ENGINEERING SERVICES SWM TOPSOIL MATERIAL DISPOSAL RECREATION PROGRAM TROPHIES WA EMPLOYMENT LAW SUBSCRIPTION RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES KLCC KOREAN LUNCHES SUPPLIES FACILITIES HVAC SYSTEM SVCS PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09 :40 CHECK # 137931 137932 137933 137934 137935 137936 137937 137938 137939 137940 137941 137942 137943 137944 137945 137946 137947 137948 137949 137950 137951 137952 137953 137954 137955 137956 VEND # 002566 002574 002616 002623 002656 002664 002693 002734 002747 002778 002780 002790 002798 002822 002846 002853 002870 002887 002898 002916 002924 002925 002935 002955 002962 003013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME AMOUNT U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS 26.20 GRAHAM & DUNN, P.C. 40.85 GREASE MONKEY 29.31 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 9.10 PETTY CASH FUND-SENIORS ACCT 85.62 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC 149.88 SAFELITE AUTO GLASS CORP 497.81 CTED-OFFICE OF MFGR HOUSING 85.00 DAVID WILBRECHT 57.85 SADDLE SOAR RANCH 240.00 FASTSIGNS 125.43 CONSTRUCTION TESTING LABS INC 78.00 HANNA NGUYEN 30.00 PETTY CASH-DUMAS BAY CENTRE 28.36 BRUCE DEES & ASSOCIATES 17,375.22 80.03 25 MINUTE PHOTO FREEWAY TRAILER SALES INC 135.99 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES 24,421.97 50.00 IACP CANBER CORPS 2,291.67 THE ST PAUL 1,200.00 CENTERFORCE 1,057.06 101. 66 COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION FERRELLS FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO 433.81 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 93.38 LAUCKS TESTING LAB INC 25.00 PAGE 8 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION DBC PROMOTIONAL ADVERTISING PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES CITY VEHICLES MAINT SERVICES OFFICE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEES FLEX ACCOUNTS PLAN CITY VEHICLES GLASS REPLACEMNT HOUSING SEMINAR CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT REC HORSEBACK RIDING CLASSES PRINTED SIGNS ASPHALT & SOIL TESTING SVCS DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT CELEBRATION PARK MASTER PLAN PRINTING/PHOTO SERVICES CITY VEHICLE REPAIR & SUPPLIES COMPUTER EQUIPMENT IACP ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES VEHICLE CLAIM SETTLEMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES POLICE CONFERENCES & MEETINGS FIRE EXTINGUISHER & SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SWM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY SVCS CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09 :40 CHECK # 137957 137958 137959 137960 137961 137962 137963 137964 137965 137966 137967 137968 137969 137970 137971 137972 137973 137974 137975 137976 137977 137978 137979 137980 137981 137982 VEND # 003014 003035 003043 003048 003068 003070 003072 003073 003085 003111 003119 003170 003198 003209 003211 003216 003259 003266 003340 003341 003346 003352 003376 003380 003391 003398 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME TRANSTECH ELECTRIC INC GUIDANCE SERVICES INC OLEG K STEKLAR PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC KAREN K MCMILLION HLA INFRASTRUCTURE INC MARTY A LYON TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION GROUP NATIONAL MAl NT CONTRACTORS INC FEDERAL WAY VACUUM REPAIR MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC SPEEDY SIGN-A-RAMA USA INC WASHINGTON POLYGRAPH IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE INC WA STATE-SECRETARY OF STATE FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INT INC TRENT D MILLER P.E. DAVID H SMITH PHD KING COUNTY FINANCE DEPT IMSA MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ALEX KIRICHENKO BRIAN WILSON CRAFT OUTLET WILLIAM MCATEER AMOUNT 62,756.19 832.50 135.00 297.36 371.01 760.00 105.89 1,065.60 90,185.78 1,825.00 32.53 30.00 524.54 250.00 255.27 10.00 464.18 4,816.00 725.00 32.00 50.00 68,710.25 35.00 140.00 84.46 79.00 PAGE 9 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION TRAFFIC SIGNAL CHANNELIZATION LAW DEPT OFFICE TEMP SERVICES DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT SWM WATER QUALITY EQUIPMENT DISTRICT COURT SCREENER SVCS TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT HERITAGE WOOD PARK MASTER PLAN COMPUTER EQUIPMENT FACILITIES JANITORIAL SERVICE DUMAS BAY VACUUM REPAIR/SUPPLY ALARM MONITORING SERVICES PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS POLICE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPHS CITY RECORDS STORAGE SERVICES COpy OF REPORT FILED POLICE DEPT EQUIPMENT STREETS PROJECTS ENGINEERING POLICE CONSULTATION SERVICES KING COUNTY BLDG PARKING FEES IMSA MEMBERSHIP DUES POLICE EQUIPMENT DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 137983 137984 137985 137986 137987 137988 137989 137990 137991 137992 137993 137994 137995 137996 137997 137998 137999 138000 138001 138002 138003 138004 138005 138006 138007 138008 VEND # 003410 003440 003444 003446 003466 003500 003502 003506 003528 003532 003559 003563 003587 003606 003611 003619 003643 003645 003716 003750 003752 003766 003782 003827 003831 003834 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME BP OIL COMPANY BILL HATCH SPORTING GOODS WEST CAMPUS CLEANERS STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY INC WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS KENNETH ERBAR DISPLAY SUPPLY INC WA STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRNG BUCKLEY NURSERY COMPANY INC PHILLIP WOLF GRAMM VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER THE PAPER ZONE WA STATE CRIME PREVENTION ASSN OMEGA CELLTECH FEDERAL WAY CYCLE CENTER HELSELL FETTERMAN LLP AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE GALLAGHER-WESTFALL GROUP INC STAFFORD FREY COOPER COAST WIDE SUPPLY TUCCI & SONS INC WESTMARK EXCAVATING INC BRUTE FORCE GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES SOUND TELECOM AMOUNT 52.97 697.76 540.68 281. 20 91. 85 438.20 201. 00 82.35 190.00 4,258.20 30.00 129.60 107.49 50.00 302.35 1,991 . 02 28.00 4,423.24 4,791.20 1,261.99 121. 88 127,750.32 18,381. 93 1,300.80 375.00 138.00 PAGE 10 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION FUEL FOR POLICE VEHICLES RECREATION SUPPLIES POLICE UNIFORMS CLEANING SVCS POLICE DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES POLICE FINGERPRINT/SUPPLIES DISTRICT COURT RADAR EXPERT POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION DECORATION/SUPPLIES POLICE TRAINING COURSES SPORTS FIELD RENOVATION DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC POLICE EMERGENCY DISPATCH SVCS POLICE EVIDENCE SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP DUES VEHICLE CELL PHONE INSTALLATN POLICE MOTORCYCLES REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES DUMAS BAY CENTRE JANITORIAL SV LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING POLICE INQUEST ATTORNEY SVCS FACILITIES RESTROOM SUPPLIES ROAD SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION SUPPL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION SVCS BPA TRAIL MATERIALS POLICE POLYGRAPH SERVICES PARK EMERGENCY ANSWERING SVC CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 138009 138010 138011 138012 138013 138014 138015 138016 138017 138018 138019 138020 138021 138022 138023 138024 138025 138026 138027 138028 138029 138030 138031 138032 138033 138034 VEND # 003851 003877 003893 003894 003898 003923 003924 003956 003983 003984 003987 003990 004001 004004 004019 004057 004060 004064 004074 004091 004093 004100 004105 004111 004114 004122 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME BOB C STERBANK LILE INTERNATIONAL PORTER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON RADIO COMMUNICATION SERVICES DIAZ FITNESS CENTER BIT-BY-BIT COMPUTERS INC IŒYBANK SEAFIRST BANK BEST PARKING LOT CLEANING NORTHWEST NEXUS INC PIVETTA BROS CONSTRUCTION INC BANK OF SUMNER PACIFIC COAST FORD INC COLUMBIA BANK ERICKSON MCGOVERN PETERSON DRILLCO DEVICES LTD NORTHWEST FIRE INVESTIGATORS CHILDRENS WORLD DAYCARE LILE MOVING & STORAGE U S WEST BRIAN R GRANT DOUGLAS B FORTNER BICSI MONROE SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESS AMERICAN ROD & GUN AMOUNT 52.80 1,212.00 16,139.13 1,138.59 4,560.00 738.00 217.20 3,302.96 5,612.30 141.18 425.00 974.94 51.31 600.00 6,723.70 1,530.00 349.50 75.00 241.44 988.84 360.95 543.00 642.50 100.00 135.76 67.44 PAGE 11 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT DUMAS BAY CENTRE MOVING CHARGE S 356TH ST STORAGE/STREAM PRJT PORTER BROS CONST RETAINAGE POLICE RADIO COMMUNICATION SVC RECREATION GYMNASTIC INSTRUCTR DUMAS BAY CENTRE EQPMNT RENTAL RETAINAGE FOR TRANSTECH ELEC R W SCOTT CONSTRUCTN RETAINAGE PARKING LOT CLEANING COMPUTER HARDWARE MILITARY ROAD WIDENING PROJECT RETAINAGE FOR PIVETTA BROS POLICE VEHICLES/EQUIPMT LEASE RETAINAGE FOR TUCCI & SONS CELEBRATION PARK ARCHITECTURAL PUBLIC WORKS CONCRETE SUPPLIES POLICE CONFERENCES & SEMINARS CDBG CARES CHILDCARE PROGRAM POLICE OFFICER RELOCATION EXP DATA COMM LINE SERVICES POLICE VEHICLE REPAIR/STRIPES TEMP CIVIL ATTORNEY SERVICES MEMBERSHIP DUES POLICE OFFICE EQUIPMENT/SUPPLY POLICE EQUIPMENT CHEKREG2 DATE 12/15/97 DATE 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 12/15/97 09:40 CHECK # 138035 138036 138037 138038 138039 138040 138041 138042 138043 138044 138045 138046 138047 138048 138049 138050 138051 138052 138053 138054 138055 138056 VEND # 004128 004133 004136 004139 004140 004142 004148 004150 004152 004154 004155 004157 004158 004159 004160 004161 004163 004164 004165 004166 004167 004169 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CHECK REGISTER NAME MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERNATIONAL VR SALES CURTIS & SONS COMPUSA ADOBE SYSTEMS INC SMITH & HAWKEN SEAFIRST BANK DOMINOS PIZZA CALIFORNIA CAD SOLUTIONS FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL LORI K GREEN PHILLIP Y AHN ILYA BERNER APPLE INTERNATIONAL GOODYEAR TIRE & SERVICE CENTER KENT LITTLE GYM CSI LARRY M HESSER TONY ROMA'S CSCDHH MARTHA BURKETT WESTERN WASHINGTON GOLF COURSE TOTAL CHECKS JOB WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AMOUNT 203.85 3,766.57 168.33 1,803.87 494.83 27,675.11 155.86 48.82 1,611.00 100.00 100.00 60.00 15.00 972.00 832.08 924.00 500.00 1,456.32 250.48 40.00 736.00 110.00 1,051,823.67 Y PAGE 12 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION PRINTING SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & PARTS UNIFORM SAFETY CLOTHING PC SOFTWARE/HARDWARE TRAINING SOFTWARE EQUIPMENT SW&R COMPOST BIN SALES/EDUCATN RETAINAGE FOR BUCKLEY NURSERY PIZZA FOR FALL CARNIVAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE MADRIGAL CHOIR PERFORMANCE JURIED ART EXHIBITION AWARD INTERPRETER SERVICES INTERPRETER SERVICES GRAPHIC DESIGN & MARKETING SVC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & PARTS RECREATION GYMNASTIC CLASSES POLICE CONSULTING ASSESSMENT POLICE LEADERSHIP TRAINING FOOD SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER SVCS POLICE LEADERSHIP TRAINING PARKS LANDSCAPE SEMINAR MEETING DATE: January 6, 1998 ITEM# :JILL -- fi) .......................................................................................................................................... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: Monthly Financial Report ........ ............................... ...... ............................................................................................. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: _X_CONSENT ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT _PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION _OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ......................................................................................................................................... . A TT ACHMENTS: Monthly Financial Report ........ ...................................... ............................................................................................ SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Month of November 1997 .......................................................................................................................................... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was not reviewed by the Finance Committee due to meeting cancellation, therefore no recommendation. .......................................................................................................................................... ~ ~ . ~ ~. ~. ~. ~ ~ . ~. ~. ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~. ~ ~. ~ . . . . ~.. ~. ~ ~ APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ~~-4:... ~ (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED _TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................,."""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"...1 Operating Revenues.................................................""""""""'."".""""""""""""""""2 Operating Expenditures """"""""""""""""""""""""""""".....................................2-3 Local Retail Sales Tax """"."""""""""""""""""'.""""'".........................................4-6 Real Estate Excise Tax................................................................................................6-7 State Shared Revenues.................................................................... ................ ...............7 Building Permit and Plan Check Activity ...................................................................... 8-9 Utility Taxes """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".........9 District Court Activity...................................................................................................... 1 0 Police and Jail Service Activity """""""""""""""""""""""""""................................11 Recreation Programs and Retreat Center Performance................................................ 12 Community Development Block Grants .........................................................................13 Public Works Contracted Services.................................................................................14 Capital Projects..............................................."""""""""""""""""""""""""""... 14-16 Cash and Investments................................................................................................... 17 City of Federal Way Novemb,." 1997 Monthly Financial Report INTRODUCTION 1e Monthly Financial Report (MFR) is intended to provide an overview of financial activity that have taken place in the .¿porting period. This report focuses mainly on activity incurred in the following operating funds: General, Street, Arterial Street, Solid Waste, Snow and Ice Removal, Paths & Trail, Surface Water Management, Strategic Reserve, Airport Strategic Reserve, Debt Service, and Dumas Bay Centre. There is a synopsis of the City's Capital Improvement Funds on pages 14 through 16. The Summary of Sources and Uses (Attachment A) captures financial activity through November for the years 1993 through 1997. Ib!!ú Prø8cted Fund 1181..- Nowmb8r, 1881 $13,4.24,124 P3llnIInd Loans Solid Wast. 2.3% I'oIiœ 2.2% 2.3% Overall, operating revenues ($31,047,915) are exceeding the adopted monthly budget ($29,714,411) as of November, 1997, and operating expenditures ($24,510,037) are below I the adopted monthly budget through November ! ($26,099,782). This results in the City's operating I funds having a projected increase in fund balance of $2,923,249 as of November 1997. The savings are a result of $1,333,504 in additional revenue mainly due to Utility Taxes, Real Estate Excise Taxes, Criminal Justice Sales Tax, and State Shared Revenue activity and projected expenditure savings due to Public Safety, Public Works, Community Development Services, and Parks and Recreation. Total General Governmental projected savings is $1,411,610 of which $521,862 is in the Public Safety Department due "'Irimarily to the hiring delay earlier in the year and internal service fund savings. The Parks and Recreation Department's vings of $297,177 is due in part to the delay of hiring seasonal maintenance workers. The Snow and Ice Fund has exceeded its adopted monthly budget ($42,369) by $13,923 due to the storms that occurred at the end of 1996 and beginning of 1997. The adopted monthly budget is one half of the total budget for the first six months with the assumption that storms occur during the first and last part of the year. Due to the fact that this fund may be overexpended by the end of the year, the budget was increased by $30,000 in the Mid-biennium Budget Adjustment. Table A identifies the adopted, revised, and actual fund balance as of November, 1997: I I I Designate ! 0.1% HIGHLIGHTS Snow & lea 0.6% .......-... FUND BALANCE COMPARISON 1997 If.V'.." ACtual lfev,.ecI V8 ~ÇßlfJI Fund Budget Budget November Amount Percent General & Street Reserved for Police $ 305,207 $ 305,207 $ 305,207 $ - 0.00% Reserved for P3 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 0.00% Reserved for Loans 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 0.00% Unreserved 228,679 2,486,042 3,479,646 993,604 434.50% Arterial Street 69,831 69,831 497,146 427,315 611.93% Utility Tax Fund 2,800,000 - 2,366,943 2,366,943 84.53% Solid Waste 146,346 237,114 279,992 42,878 29.30% Snow & Ice Removal 100,000 100,000 96,524 (3,476) -3.48% Path & Trails 14,951 3,310 13,698 10,388 69.48% Surface Water Management 646,697 957,881 2,684,897 1,727,016 267.05% Strategic Reserve 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,721,782 21,782 1.28% Airport Strategic Reserve 300,000 300,000 300,000 - 0.00% Debt Service 2,521,972 4,032,090 4,102,921 70,831 2.81% Dumas Bay Centre - - 39,739 39,739 nla Total . If, 14;S,H;J , 10,001,475 , .v, ....,_... , D,D.f.U~U '" City of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report Overall, operating revenues collected through November total $31,047,915 which is $1,333,504 or 4.5% above the historical monthly budget ($29,714,411). Operating revenues have grown $3,543,251 or 12.9% compared with activity through November 1996 ($27,504,664) due primarily to the addition of a utility tax which was not effective until the later part of February, 1996, as well as a rate increase in March, 1997. Criminal Justice Sales Tax and Dumas Bay revenues are exceeding 1996 revenues, as well as the revenue being collected by our new Police Department (ie: money/property seizures, mall security, licenses and permits). Real estate excise tax as well as State- Shared Revenues continues to outperform our current year estimates. Finally, Recreation Fees lag by $6,595 or 1.7%. This shortfall can be attributed to the late distribution of the activities brochure. We will continue to monitor all revenue sources and report all variances from our estimates. The following describes some of the major revenue sources and the variances that we are reporting through November 1997. REVENUES Graph 2 illustrates, through November, a comparison of actual revenue collections versus monthly historical estimates. Attachment A further details operating revenue collections and trends between 1993 and 1997. ~ ~ RIMn8 AduIII... HIIaIcII aq,t I3ItirrIIIIIa 'ßI'caVI rtMntIr 1997 sncm.<m $1acm.<m $16,cm.<m $14.cm.<m $12,cm.<m $1o,cm.cm ss.cm.cm l3.cm.cm $4.cm.cm szcm.<m $- T- 0'QIb' Sa FIr8 I Fa! ME IrtIIp.t Uti Rmts I. EsliITáe . PdlØ ¡ Sales tax payments received for October total $687,585 which is below the projected budget ($688,847) by $1,262 or . .2%. Compared to 1996 October, sales tax revenues have increased $20,834 or 3.1 %. Yea r-to-date , sales tax revenues. total $6,887,819 which is $9,747 above the monthly historical estimate ($6,878,072). Included in the January sales tax revenues was $16,187 for a major retailer that should have been recorded in December. Considering this correction, sales tax revenues through October would have been $6,871,632 or $6,440 below the adopted estimate. Government, which comprised 1.4% of our total sales tax collections through October, has increased $30,878 or 44.9% from 1996, which was due to a correction that was reported in January, 1996. The services and contracting components have also experienced growth. The 7.8% increase in services is attributable to an increase in activity for automotive repair shops and smaller business and personal activity. Construction activity has also increased significantly, which is further reflected in the City's building permit trends for 1997. However, these gains are offset by a slowdown in wholesaling activity, which has decreased $146,323 or 27.5%, due primarily to Lucent Technology's one-time large distribution in April 1996. Retailing activity increased $91,130 or 2.1 %. When considering the correction in January, retailing activity instead increased $58,756. Real estate excise taxes through November, 1997 were $1,713,697 and are continuing to exceed projections of $998,323 by $715,374 or 71.7%. Compared to year-to-date through November, 1996 ($1,378,825), they have increased $334,872 or 24.3%. We have not received any detailed information from King County regarding the November distribution, but will continue to monitor this revenue source. Building Permits and Related Fees are also exceeding budgetary projections. Through November, we have received $687,291 which is $7,596 or 1.1% above the adopted estimates ($679,695). These fees are exceeding or meeting all previous years revenues including 1992 (which was previously our highest year). In addition, this revenue source is recovering 37.0% of the Community Development operating budget, which exceeds the budgetary recovery rate of 35.7%. EXPENDITURES The City has expended $24,510,037 through November, which is below the monthly historical adopted budget of' $26,099,782 by $1,589,745 or 6.1%, due mainly to savings in the Public Safety, Public Works, Parks and Recreation and Community Development. 2 City of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report ~111 EIqødhns ÞduøI w HsIøIcå a.vt &iii I ..... 1troLVt ttMnbr 1997 Public Safety has expended $9,521,749 which is $521,862 or 5.6% below the monthly adopted budget estimate. The projected savings are due mainly to the delay of hiring police officers, savings in the internal service funds and lack of historical information for our new Police Department. $11,~cm $1Q~cm ~~cm $l,em,cm $7,~cm S6,~em ~em,em $4,~cm ~em,cm S2, em, em $1,~cm $- F\j) Sly AOR:S CD Sa PN lMi ~ Sa (X)'O.1 D.mIs 0!Ii &: 8Er¡ PARKS and Recreation are below monthly adopted budget estimates ($2,694,408) by $297,177. The savings consists of lower than anticipated expenditures in Recreation ($201,409) and Parks Maintenance ($95,767). The projected expenditure savings are due primarily to the delay of hiring seasonal maintenance workers. Compared with 1996 activities, expenditures have decreased $613,361, which would reflect the reductions that occurred in the Parks and Recreation department during the 1997 budget process. In addition, it is anticipated that the Arts Commission will again carry forward a portion of its budget for reappropriation in 1998. At year-end, an estimated savings of $100,000 is expected by the department. I. B.qEU kJLB I ,he Solid Waste Division will request a carry forward of over $52.000 in grant funding to be allocated to multi-family recycling program expansion and other projects for 1998 and 1999. This carry forward will offset the $64,685 variance through November, when combined with expenditures from the Fall Compost Bin Distribution and the Fall Yard Waste Calendar production and distribution, which will be recorded as December expenditures. The Asphalt Overlay Program has incurred expenses of $1,602,556 or 77% of it's appropriated budget ($2,091,661) for 1997. The budget includes $362,189 carried forward from the 1996 Overlay Program due to savings in construction and administration. 1997 Overlay Program: The City Council approved the overlay streets list at the 3/4/97 meeting. Bids were opened 5/13/97 and Lakeside Industries, the low bidder of $1,597,988, was awarded the project at the 5/20/97 Council Meeting. The contractor has completed all work on the contract. The contract will be presented at the January 1998 Council Meeting for final acceptance. CONCLUSION In summary, the overall operating revenues for November are exceeding the projected monthly budget, with Real Estate Excise Tax and utility tax exceeding budgetary projections. Building permit fees are also exceeding monthly budget estimates. The overall operating expenditures are below estimates at this time, with Management Services, Public Safety, Public Works, Community Development and Parks and Recreation under projections and Civil Legal Services, and Snow and Ice Removal exceeding projections. It is anticipated that all these departments will meet their budget projections as the year progresses. 3 City of Federal Way " November 1997 Monthly Financial Report Local Retail Sales Tax Table 1 and Graph 4 summarize local retail sales tax revenues. Sales tax collections lag two months. For October sales activities, the City accrues sales tax revenues in November, and the City receives cash in December. At the time this report was prepared, sales tax revenues were not available for November. Attachment A reflects accrued estimates. ~ SALES TAX REVENUES October 1995 through October 1997 11150,000 1IlOO,000 Holiday h...,n -------~---------~ ------------------ 1750,000 1850,000 - - - ----------------------- - ----------------- '-,000 - - - - ----------------- $850,000 Through October, sales tax proceeds totaled $6,887,819 which was $9,747 or .1% '_,000 above the adopted budget estimate ($6,878,072). Included in January sales tax revenue was $16,187 for a major retailer that should have been reported in December 1996. Considering this correction, sales tax revenues through October would have been $6,871,632 which is $6,440 below the adopted estimate, Compared to 1996 October sales tax, revenues have increased $20,834 or 3.1 %. It is estimated that the sluggish sales during the first two months of the year are due to the snow storm that occurred around the holiday season, when many of the post-holiday sales occur. $850,000 i 11 J JIll i ~ II ~ III i I ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ i J ~ TA8LE 1 I.OCAI. ¥TAIL SAL& TAX IæIlf!NUI!S """'.'887 1- ..... . .'05 1IN 1N7 1N7.udg8t Month kiwi Actual Actuel ActuIII .1IfIJI«° AdJMIJ '~C8 , 11'8tf8Ðce anuary $ 849,037 $ 870,318 $ 882,234 $ 883,229 $ 912,929 $ 902,478 $ (10,451) -1.1"A ebruary 579,220 580,171 602,830 607,790 641,470 640,967 (503) -O.1"A March 522,576 500,911 573,687 577,022 573,117 582,547 9,430 1.6~ "prii 585,809 597,164 624,667 768,980 660,433 660,733 300 0.0% May 556,790 632,367 599,100 607,104 652,260 669,058 16,798 26% une 615,567 603,320 617,531 600,594 648,996 657,032 8,036 1.2% uly 603,765 651,123 676,546 650,423 711,904 694,702 (17,202) -2.4% ugust 619,020 635,050 713,489 734,368 700,493 735,617 35,124 5.0% eptember 609,162 626,974 676,731 652,886 687,623 657,100 (30,523) -4.4011 )etober 627,343 636,254 654,050 666,751 688,847 687,585 (1,262) -0.2% Noverrber .. 594,528 618,765 650,583 664,611 828,141 """""ruor 603,980 654,256 644,666 623,386 678,581 rebil s 7""717 IS. 7,-,m IS 7,11f, 11'" "8,",1<13 ' . "'_,784 S ...,818 S 8,7.0 0.1" .......... S m,li8.l.a I 1OIi""~10 ' 1M2,38"DI S _,8D2,781 S -'1D,712 S . 'i18.J78,1O2 S 1,180,407 41.1" . Rop...'" m_, "'........ pottomo fat tho '887 Adopted BudVoI N_b.,ncludo..n ........ "'"82.337 duo to tho Mut.B,........ Budgol Adju_onl M AeoN. -- .... "'-In __onl A. .' 4 city of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report Graph 5 illustrates retail sales by industry sector. Retail trade has generated the largest component of sales activity during October (65.0%) followed by services (9.7%), contract & construction (7.6%), wholesaling (5.6%) and manufacturing (4.0%). Transp/comm/utility, finance, government and other activity generate the remainder of sales tax receipts. Table 2 and Graph 6 compare year-to-date sales tax growth by major industry sector be~een 1993 and 1997. Compared with 1996, sales tax collections have increased $138,673 or 2.1%. Once again when the correction for December receipts is considered ($16,187), the variance would be an increase of $106,299 or 1.6%. !iIIRIú RETAIL SALES TAX DISTR8UTION Major indUstry Sec:tors ServlCOl 1.~% Ret.1I Tr.dI Can_lanA::anlrlct WIId_iIIg TllnsplCcmmlUtHl1y Mlnufacturtng Goy"",omon! FlnilnsIROII EII.te Other 1.184 .............. ...............,. .................................' .........""""" 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 60.0% TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF SALES TAX COLLECTIONS BY SIC CODE GROUP TluDuøh October Component #993 UN ! 1885 ¡ 1996 un Ch"'fle from 1m GrouÞ AcDMI ActI.UII AC8Ial ! AdU", Actual , Chllnøe " ChMJøe Retail Trade $ 4,098,897 $ 4,200,441 $ 4,188,817 $ 4,386,506 $ 4,477,636 $ 91,130 2.1% ervices 508,136 505,077 555,806 617,813 665,957 48,144 7.8% onstructioßlContract 451,722 484,482 614,560 398,485 525,839 127,354 32.0% holesaling 354,479 345,941 487,626 531,991 385,668 (146,323) -27.5o/c ransp/Comm'Utility 312,113 319,556 242,430 259,655 296,131 36,476 14.0% o1anufacturing 255,082 275,700 319,953 346,890 273,577 (73,313) -21.1% )tiler 52,299 72,370 68,774 70,893 76,210 5,317 7.5% inilnsIReal Estale 64,342 63,772 56,947 68,170 87,180 19,010 27.9o/c :;ovømment 71,218 66,313 85,953 68,743 99,621 30,878 44.9°A Total $ 8,'18,288 $ 8,333,652 $ &,.820,866 I $ 8,748,'48 $ 1,IIB7,818 $ "8,813 2.'~ Taxable Sties $ 7",J20,ooo $ 7sc,GOI,190 S 788,1118,333 {$ 801,489,782 $ 819,978,A&2 S 11,508,880 2.1~ Retailing activity has increased by $58,756 or 1.3% compared to 1996 activities when considering the $16,187 change due to a major retailing reporting December receipts in January. In addition, the City has experienced reduced revenues from the closure of K-Mart, Olympic Sports, Home Express and Best. It is anticipated these lost revenues will be recognized by increased sales in other businesses. The services and contracting components have all experienced growth. The 7.8% increase in services is attributable to an increase in activity for automotive repair shops and smaller business and personal service activity. Construction activity has also increased significantly, which is further reflected in the City's building permit trends for 1997. Wholesaling related activity has decreased $146,323 or 27.5% due primarily to Lucent Technologies, which reported a large one-time project in 1996. The other decreases are due to the loss of Reinhold Petroleum which in 1996 consolidated its corporate headquarters and warehouse activities to Kent and Curtin Matheson relocating its business. 5 City of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report Government related activity have increased $30,878 or 44.9% due to a correction of approximately $17,000 that occurred in January, 1996. Iœb..I Table 3 details, through October, comparative sales tax activity between 1991 and 1997 segregated by various retail centers including the SeaTac Mall, S 348th retail center and the Pavilion retail center. The City's largest retail center, S 348th retail center which generates over 16% of the City's sales tax has experienced growth of $144,586 or 14.2% in taxable retail activity as compared with 1996. The SeaTac Mall experienced a slight increase in taxable retail sales for the month of October. Compared with 1996, sales tax collections have increased $1,514 or .2%. After moderate growth between 1991 and 1994, taxable retail sales activity at the mall has steadily slowed since 1994. The Pavillion Center has experienced an increase in sales tax collections of $14,683. Hotels & Motels activity have increased compared to 1996 due mainly to a correction in 1996 and the difference in timing of returns. We will continue to monitor and follow-up on the reporting of sales tax revenue for this business. SALES TAX GROWTH Major Induatry Sectors Change from October 1996 to 1997 /e""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" 80.0% ~----------------------------------------------- ': 40.0% ,,- - " ----------------- 2n0% 0.0% .20.0% -40.0% 1181811 Trade - com.otIng WI,,"_ng TCV Moll'" oø- ~E GeM TABUlE 3 &4U~$ TAX COMPARI$ON 1"1.1"7 .. 1IOi... II roup 1811 11192 '883 1.. 1995 1896 '1817 .' CMRoe % Chlnga ToW SaI.. 'nut ""341.8112 ' "'7(10.7" 'UfUN 'U33,852 '8.uo,.... ,. 7"'.141' 1.117,1111 I f~67a U% South :M8th Retail Block S <141,279 S 552,535 S 758,829 S 769,308 S 974,793 S 1,016,933 S 1,161,519 S 1<14,586 14.2' ~ chlll'lce from prev vr nJa 25.2% 37.0% 1.6% 26.7% 4.3% 14.2% na n ercent21ge r:A total 10.2% 9.7% 12.3% 12.1% 14.7% 15.1% 16.9% 1.8% 11.9 IeITIC: Mill 877,412 898,652 910,681 825,023 892,005 848,957 850,471 S 1,514 0.2". ~ chlll'lce from prev vr niB 2.5% 1.2% 1.6% -3.6% -4.8% 0.2% na n ercentage r:A total 20.2% 15.8% 14.8% 14.6% 13.5% 12.6% 12.3% -0.2% -1.8"A -'*r Auto Sales S 202,006 S 208,821 S 260,188 $ 306,548 S 307,049 $ 330,1153 $ 324,138 $ (5,915) .1.rA ~ chlll'loe from prev yr nIa 3.4% 246% 17.8% 0.2% 7.5% -1.8% na n ercentllae r:A total 4.7% 3.7% 4.2% 4.8% 4.6% 4.9% 4.7% -0.2% -3.8"A S 312th to S 318th Blk $ 82,415 $ 89,657 $ 88.aoo S 87,382 $ 87,080 $ 78,827 $ 70,053 $ (9,574) -12.0"A ~ chlll'lge from prev yr nIa 8.8% -1.0% -1.6% -0.4% -8.6% -12.0% na n Þercentaae r:A total 1.9% 1.6% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.0% -0.2% -13.8"A I"IvRHon Center nil nil nil nil nil 107,075 121.759 $ 14,684 13.7"11 ~ chlll'lge from prev yr nIa nIa nJa nJa nIa nJa nJa na m ercentage r:A total nIa nIa nJa nIa nJa 1.6% 1.8% na n Hotels & Motels $ 38,392 S 32,885 $ 33,685 $ 31,172 $ 38,012 $ 32,502 $ 38,289 $ 3.787 11.7"11 % chance from prev yr nJa -9.6% 2.4% -7.5% 21.9% -14.5% 11.7% na m ercentaae r:A total 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 9.4"A Real Estate Excise Tax .' Graph 7 and Table 4 illustrate collection history for the 1st and 2nd % percent real estate excise taxes. The table and graph both reflect the cyclical variation in this revenue source. During November, REET revenues exceeded the adopted budget by $103,551 or 121.2%. The monthly budget estimates are based on historical REET revenues received since incorporation in 1990 through 1996, a seven year period. Even with this slight refinement, monthly estimates are vulnerable to certain fundamental economic changes which do not 6 city of Federal Way Novømber 1997 Monthly Financial Report occur at the same point every year. Compared with 1996 activities, November REET revenues have increased $28,800 or 18.0%. Year-to-date through November, REET revenues are $715,374 or 71.7% above revenue estimates. ë ::I 0 ~ SWR!l1 $2,000,000 $1,BOO,OOO $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 "".: $200,000 $- REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX ACTIVITY .................,.....,...................................!~.r.~.u.~~..~~~~~.~!~..............................................,....,...".........,.........................". $1,11*,187 . . $M"'riSI '~'.~OI,ð18 . '$1,113,428 $1.121,IU4 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1996 1996 1997 Adpt 1997 Act TØtE.. .. . . MAt nTAn Df;ISI! TAX NwM.œs "813- f887 "". 1813 I 18a1 1/J85 11K18 1107 18818udff1t Month A I:tU8t Ar;tWI AdUIII AcfIJ8I 8udget . At1tU8/ , v.fMce ! 'V818nce anuary $ 80,908 ' $ 65,621 $ 52,253 $ 70.177 $ 51,060 $ 94.719 $ 43.659 ' 855 : ebruarv 56,212 72,702 63 , 025 84 ,096 57,125 101,508 44,383 77.7. \,larch 78,~ 249,510 83,156 105,133 107,858 132,678 24,820 23.0. &,pril 84,173 102,473 73,850 155,107 95,248 186,187 90,939 95.5. \,lay 105,092 94,387 73,648 133,203 96,271 108,060 11,789 12.2. une 167,854 130,113 107,801 133,081 109,889 120,432 10,543 9.6. uly 163,092 96,629 70,258 130,765 107,392 231,911 124,519 1159. ..ugust 106,684 97,514 183,599 123,913 101,813 181,490 79,677 78.3~ September 100,392 82,804 82,369 180,371 98,440 151,333 52,893 53.7~ :)debar 148,484 64,606 76,809 102,780 87,779 216,381 128,602 148.5. I/overnber" 114,078 65,105 132,917 160,199 85 ,448 188,999 103,551 1212" ~~._-_..._------- -- 2O2,~.- 93 ,509 ~,3~ 146,325 101,677 S' """'-'713,1&7 o.o~ Toal S 1,401,8i4 I $ 1,2t4,873 $ 1.-,061 Š'--¡;ÜŠ:;¡iëï S..ou¡:¡öO,ooö' S 718,374 n.~ Est. RE Value S 281,182,800 : S 242,914,IlOO S 218,010,200 S 30&,030,000 $ 220,000,000 $ 342,738,440 $ 143,074,840' nl . R09-ont. monthly histaricol )IIttom. for the 1997 Adopted Budget. - Accrued ootImet.. woro1locted In Attochmort A. State Shared Revenues Table 5 presents a comparison of state shared revenues received through October between 1993 and 1997 by revenue type. Accrued estimates for November are reflected in Attachment A for local criminal justice sales tax, fuel taxes, vehicle license fees, and liquor profits taxes. These payments will be received on December 31st for the month of November. : . TAIILIt $ "" STATE SNIIRED IŒIIEMJES fff13 .1881 ~ 1883 ,.... I 1885 "" L. 'iiiØet-!!!~- - ,--t. 18878udøet___.- R8II8nw Aeru.I AelUtll Ae"" ACIIMI ¡ 8u ., AØU8I , V8rl8nn . V8'f8lle8 M~!J' VeI'c,t'!;: 5P. T/I)I S IF!; ~"C S \'43~9'S 1 Jo:¡ò ::,::;> S 732 Bé4' S 566:¡at', S eli~.'C;2è : S 2',3'::; ~ 2' :::amper Excise Tax 15,710 17,555 17,546 17,318 17,985 17,447 (518) -2.9. iquor Prdits Tax" 375,268 367,111 305,281 312,901 312,027 303,170 (8,857) -2.80 iquor Excise Tax 182,112 181,356 169,252 164,509 156,382 168,084 11,702 7.5 :rim Just L!JN-PoplDCD 112,210 233,128 280,908 260,878 68,490 96,392 27,902 4O.n :rim Just Hgh Oime 163,477 211,697 185,695 204,913 177,666 224,894 47,228 26.6. qualization 515,437 621,225 464,140 305,645 204,276 292,941 88,665 43.40 ocaI Oim Just"" 824,001 880,346 910,712 951,954 940,584 1,061,502 120,918 12.9. uel Tax*" 1,370,960 1,440,853 1,415,355 1,397,788 1,428,830 1,424,859 (4,171) -0.3 eh Lie Fees" 506,131 535,034 516,507 518,880 518,279 549,281 31,002 6.00 T.. .<1 : o.zn.4Ø8 4,867.111 4,4811,585 -4 338,2'13 7.5' manor- ;æs - ..,,3'710 -I."" -1.1'110' .:mt M !WI Repro.on.. mo"'lyh....~..1 )IIlom. (11110- 11117)lartlle11117 Adopted Budge!. - A....edeotlme...IarNovombor 11117... ..tooted In AltacllmontA. 7 city of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report Local criminal justice sales tax to date of $1,061,502 is exceeding the estimated revenues ($940,584) by $120,918 or 12.9%. Motor vehicle excise taxes are greater than budgetary projections through October and vehicle license fees are exceeding projections by $31,002 or 6.0%. Equalization taxes are $88,665 or 43.4% above budgetary projections due to conservative budgeting. Graph 8 and Table 6 illustrate building permit I zoning fee I plan review fee activity between 1991 and 1997 and between 1993 and 1997, respectively. Overall, Community Development permits and fees total $687,291 which is $7,595 or 1.1 % above the adopted budget estimate ($679,696). Compared with 1996 activities ($535,784), permit revenues and building fees have increased $151,507 or 28.3%. Building permit fees have exceeded budgetary projections for the first several months of 1997, but have recently fallen below. Through November 1997. collections total $340,496 which is $7,582 or 2.2% below the adopted budget estimate ($348,078). Electrical fees have remained above budgetary expectations. Collections total $95,150 which is $9,125 or 10.6% above adopted budgetary estimates ($86,025). Zoning fees collected through November total $54,916 which is $28,374 or 34.1% below the adopted budget estimate ($83,290). Plan check fees collected during the same period total $196,730 which is above the adopted budget estimate ($162,303) by $34,427 or 21.2%. Sign code citation fee and sign code permit collections which through November total $13,337 are included with zoning fees. Building Pennit and Plan Check Activity 1Ir8b.J PERMITIZONINGIPLAN CHECK FEES Through NoY8ll\b8r $700,000 ,.-. --- .. .-. .. _.-- --. -1nIpI-0<I In .......,.~ $800,000 $800,000 $_,000 0 $300,000 $:2110,000 $'00.000 $- ,., ,.z ,.7- '.7-Act 0 TA8L.E 6 81J1.DNG PÐWrr'IIZOlM'IG ÆESII'&.AN CHECK FRS '883 . '887 1Ø3 fffU 1..5 1M ff1f7 f"'8udøet . Rlnnue .. . AduItl : ÄCfU8f .Adu8I Ar:tufI 8adJJet ACIUiI , VarI8Ke . V8rl8n CI .I8nu8ry $ 33,708 $ 36,051 $ 48,383 $ 26,306 $ <16,159 $ 59,933 $ 13,774 29.8% F8bN8ry 39,795 47,671 34,376 44,823 53,517 81,164 27,647 51.7% March 61,117 52,296 30,950 48,297 68,518 95,791 27,273 39.8% AprIl 61,936 63,273 36,508 51,060 61,907 93,260 31,353 50.6 May 61,353 53,636 65,038 50,280 70,874 52,379 (18,495} -26.1 Joo. 56,643 39,732 69,015 85,217 78,079 57,030 (21,049) -27.0 July 50,760 36,428 60,208 64,655 63,030 50,009 (13,021) -20.7 August <16,091 42,525 71,299 60,072 57,699 56,711 (988) -1.7 September 55,870 67,062 58,683 37,509 86,524 61,053 (5,471) -8.2% Oc:tober 59,489 38,435 60,354 42 ,402 56,673 47,776 (8,897) -15.7% NoY8mber 55,740 70,370 43,435 45,163 56,716 32,185 (24,531) -43.3% December 57,415' 49,954 81,867 49,613 64,613 0.0% """",',w""Ti." ""$:_~1: Eli. ,J",-~"'.: 1:,.,::,.,w.M1,' i,f"" .,' '. I""']'P.~ .::1;"'.: tM'" ,,:::::,::::'::::::::::::::::::::,;j!Ii,...,:::::::::::,: .. "...., . " ., ,.:,:.:.:.: . '., .. "".., , , :...::" :':' ::"':::::':':':""""""",:.:::, :', ,-:':':':':':'.,'..'.: .,'..,.': :,,::::::::::::::~~:,: '..,.., EJcp thru November 1,507,221 1,318,823 1,549,756 1,589,034 1,893,700 1,855,502 na III RIICCMr)' Ratio 38.6% 41.5'11. 37.3'11. 33.7'11. 35.9'11. 37.0'11. na III YTD RecOll8IY Ratio 39.4'11. 41.6'11. 39.0'11. 34.0'11. 35.7'11. na na 118 Through November, building permit related revenues have recovered 37.0% of Community Development operating expenditures which total $1,855,502. This recovery ratio is above the adopted estimate of 35.7% and also above the 1996 recovery ratio which through December 1996 totaled 34.0%. 8 City of Federal Way November J7 Monthly Financial Report Table 7 presents a synopsis of building permit activity through November for new construction between 1993 and 1997. 18;; S 10 ¡ro.:'!:;; Jc;:' TJUIU! 7 8UILDINØ AC7M1'Y . NeWCQHSfltflCTtON 7fvu NDV8tr68t 1885 --..--, L_._.!!!~__..._.. -.1- :53 S ¡:;.1:;!,,~d::1 ¡¡. S P,4~b,~;:;<: 21 18,607,453 12 5,514,653 3 215,451 3 11,793,140 t U "¡¡;I:s-"Té.~- :.::-, 19 24,088,646 2 522,564 1 241,000 29 229,148 '117 ";;4-' ~..., ¡"~',~-=¡;,¡,;':'~ 12 2,810,039 10 12,749,858 =--~-~ ~I!I\IOØ'!'II' Commercilll MuRi-fllrT1ily Public Mobile Homes ¡¡¡¡¡¡;¡a, fN3 6,545,978 . - 4 24 12,240,293 189,106 . - . . . 22 208,509 11 '."'A :"'1.. 69,039 17 :::1 112,723 $;!J65 'r:: Utility Taxes Table 8 summarizes utility tax revenue collections. Through October utility tax collections total $3,023,003 which is $404,235 or 15.4% above the monthly budget estimate ($2,618,768). This reflects the 5.0% rate which was effective 3/1/97. Since we only had this revenue source for one year, it is difficult to project the monthly estimates. TABLE' ... UTILITY TAXES V..,.-t0-ftf8 (thru October) RfWØed YTD Ilf1 Budg&t BudQet Budget AauaI . $ Varian!:. " VaI1ance Electric (Puget Power) $ 1,424,017 $ 1,110,954 $ 1,164,826 $ 53,872 4.8'* Gas (WNG) 478,504 358,934 318,291 (40,643) -11.3% Garbage (FW Disposal) 227,925 184,503 213,959 29,456 16.0% Cable (Viacom & TCI) 211,873 172,773 310,534 137,761 79.7% Phone 652,940 527,834 633,097 105,263 19.9% Storm Drainage 96,754 69,416 117,479 48,063 69.2% Cellular 234,859 189,687 257,331 67,644 35.7% Pagers & Intemet 5,833 4,667 7,486 2,819 60.4% ".""""'...',""""".:'::Tótâl..: '$ :"'$.;~321:ØS":' '$: :::~.1'T6e:. J ::f;ø~OO3:. $ :'.:~3I.: 1U,% 9 City of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report GENERAL FUND District Court Activity District Court filing fees for 1997 are $18.71 for each traffic infraction and $67.56 for all citations filed. In cases where bail or penalty is paid or forfeited, the filing fee is reduced to $3.00. Through November, fines & forfeiture collections total $583,118 which is $9,796 or 1.7% below the monthly estimated revenue ($592,914). However. this revenue shortfall is offset with expenditure savings which are the result primarily of lower than anticipated court activity and contract attorney for Domestic Violence not coming on board until June/July 1997. Overall, Criminal legal Service expenditures total $678,172 which is $36,667 or 5.1 % below the monthly estimated budget ($714.839). Graph 9 compares district court expenditures and number of cases filed through November between 1992 and 1997. Table 9 presents a monthly trend of municipal court revenues and expenditures between 1993 and 1997. Øœ!b..I Court eo.a va Number of Filing. Through November $320,000 14,000 11'- 11,287 12.000 $280,000 $240,000 10,000 . 8.000 ! ~ 6,000 I ::I 4,000 :z J $200,000 ] '180.000 $120,000 $80,000 $40,000 2,000 $- 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1- Court Coats -+- Number of Filings I Because invoice processing for district . court services is currently lagging one month. the table below and attached financials reflect an expenditure accrual for November district court services. TABLE 9 CRIMINAL LEGAL SERVICES 'TIttouøhNavember SourcNl f.,3 f't4 1.,' f,t. f.,7 Uses Actu., Actu., Actu., Actu.I Budget Actu., $ v.Ñnce % V.Ñnce Revenues FIn.. & Forfeitures $ 606,443 $ 547,370 $517,828 $ 526,971 $ 582,914 $583,118 $ (e,796) -1.7% Expenditures District Court 242.286 229.105 265,341 218,021 366,656 308,690 57,965 15.8% FilingMJitness Fees 7,778 10,489 10,868 9,649 5,534 8,026 (2,492) -45.0% . Administrative 121,818 132,356 141,916 157,925 100,520 208,225 (107,704) -107.1% Public Defense 138.937 179,571 162,373 186,994 225,253 140,554 84,700 37.6% Interpreter/Screener 15,956 2,924 7,872 13,182 16,876 12,677 4,199 24.9% Total $ 526,715 $~ $ 588,370 $ SIS,710 $ 714.839 $178,172 $ 38,187 5.1% Rev Over (Under) Exp (20,332) (7,076) (20,542) (58,799) (121,925) (95,054) 26,871 n/a ,ea.es FIled 11,297 11,189 12,780 1,057 - 12,229 nI8 nla 10 City of Federal Way November 19111' Monthly FinancIal Repon Public Safety - Law Enforcement and Jail Services I~ Jail Costs vs Bookings & Maintenance Through November $900.000 $800.000 ------~J.~-------------------- 12,337 $700,000 $600,000 i $500.000 to) i $400,000 .. $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $. 1992 1993 1995 1994 1996 1997 - Expenditures -- Cases 16,000 14,000 12,000 10.001 8,000 i oil . 6,000 ~ 4.000 ] 2.000 Table 10 presents public safety expenditures between 1993 and 1997. Overall, the 1997 police budget totals $11,102,406 which includes $9,697,604 for operations. In total, police expenditures through November total $9,521,749 of which $8,495,906 is for operations and transition costs of $335,993 relates to start-up expenses. Through November, jail service expenditures (including an accrued estimate for September, October, November) total $689,850. Graph 10 compares jail service expenditures and number of bookings filed between 1993 and 1997. The 1997 King County booking fee is $108.91 per booking (a 20.3% increase over 1996, which was $90.51 per booking/day). The King County maintenance fee is $67.93 per day (a 31.4% increase over 1996, which was $51.68 per day). Booking costs are associated with registering a prisoner, while maintenance costs reflect expenditures for daily meals and shelter of prisoners. In addition, King County will assess a 10% fee for investigative work. The city is also contracting with Kent for some jail services. TABLE 10 PUBLIC SAFETY Through November Sources! 1995 1996 Thru November, 1997 Uses , Actual Actual BudDe' Actual . \I8tI8fIU " \I8tI8fIU Police - KC Contract $ 7,414,352 $ 6,633,659 $ 139,081 $ 5,262 $ (133,819) -96.2% Comm. & Dispatch - - 901,694 908,921 7,227 0.8% Administration 170,823 1,688,316 7,976,995 7,581,724 (395,270) -5.0% Subtotal'Admlnlstration 7.585.175 8.321.975 9.017.770 8.495,907 (521,862) -5.8% , Police Transition Personnel n/a 271,780 8,959 8,959 - nla Duplication Services n/a 2,810 325 325 - n/a Data/Communications nla 175,445 3,692 3,692 - nla Law Enforcement n/a 419,832 108,215 108,215 - n/a Capital n/a 321,450 139,218 139,218 - n/a Transportation nla 830,739 75,584 75,584 - nla Subtotal Police Trans. - 2,022,057 335.993 335,993 - nIB Total Law Enforement 7.585.175 10.344.032 9.353.763 8,831,900 (521,862) -5.6% Jail Services 515,162 636,261 712,132 689,850 (22,283) -3.1% Total Public Safety $8'00337 $10.980.293 $10.065,895 $9.521.750 $(544,145) -5.4°" I 1 City of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly FInancial Report Recreation and Cultural Service Programs and Dumas Bay Centre Perfonnance Table 11 summarizes recreation and cultural service and Dumas Bay Centre activity and their related recovery rates. Through November, recreation and cultural service revenues total $392,030 or 86.7% of the revised budget ($452,157). Recreation's direct program expenditures total $615,794 or 84.2% of the revised budget ($731,364). Recreation fees have recovered 63.7% of direct program costs. Including administrative expenditures totaling $305,224, the overall recovery ratio is 42.6%. The 1997 target recovery rate is 40.0%. Dumas Bay Centre operating revenues, total $373,601 or 101.5% of the adopted budget ($367,982). In February the Dumas Bay Centre implemented a Facilities Booking Program which records revenues on an accrual basis. In the past revenues were recorded on a cash basis. Through November unearned revenues relating to 1997 and 1998 activities were $12,530 and $36,186 respectively, which would bring cash basis revenues collected through November to $386,131 or 104.9% of the revised budget. Operating expenditures total $376,971 or 102.4% (excluding one time costs) of the revised budget ($367,982). The Dumas Bay Centre has recovered 99.1 % of all operating costs when unearned revenues are not considered. When unearned revenues are considered, the recovery rate is increased to 102.4%. TABLE 11 RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND DUMAS BAY CENTRE PERfORMANCE Throuøh November I ReVMU88 I ex".,.dlfures I Recovery R8tJO % I Budø" I Actual I " 1 Budget I Actual I " I Burlget I Actulll ATHLETICS AND SPECIALIZED SERVICES 26,862 18,676 69.5% 78,179 64,910 83.0% 34.4% 28.8% 48,075 37,283 77.6% 61,434 54,878 89.3% 78.3% 67.9% 6,920 9,695 140.1 % 49,257 41,269 83.8% 14.0% 23.5% 4,600 551 12.0% 26,080 4,069 15.6% 17.6% 13.5% 600 . 0.0% 1,693 305 18.0% nla nla 135,000 126,681 93.8% 100,668 96,334 95.7% 134.1% 131.5% 64,350 50,145 77.9% 71,433 74,069 103.7% 90.1% 67.7% 2,500 2,033 81.3% 31,910 30,301 95.0% 7.8% 6.7% . - nIa - - nla nIa nIa '.'Mr.?.;... :,,¡1I, ......'::I@~'~.. .$....."¡1~ ......:'1¡~ .'..:D~T% .:.......::..~t% - . nla 223,256 161,089 72.2% nla nla 288,807 . 2~,064.-,-.~:8%.LL 84S,81~ =,:-~~:2~-- 8~:ri. f-- 44.8%1='~..48:~~ COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL SERVICES 28,800 27,753 96.4% 46,302 46,628 700 1,050 150.0% 76,250 43,510 118,500 99,951 84.3% 155,658 134,242 15,250 18,212 119.4% 32,500 25,280 ::'11'_.:."¡"'.ø~~.::.'Wil~O.. . $..~... - . nla 182,117 144,135 . 183.280 . 148,"' 10.0%' .tI2,8Z7 S 313,78 $ 412,117 $ 382,030 88.7% S 1,138,737 $ 821,018 367,982 373,601 101.5% 367,982 376,971 - - nla 16,321 16,321 - - nla 25,516 - ..:..U!MP?ll..iPl ..,:ai4~..$:tJ!iØ~ø"~~1C1 Pr0gr8m Community Center Senior Services Special Populations Teen Program Arts & Crafts Bazaar Adult Athletics Youth Athletics Aquatics C.A.R.E.S .'.P.'.....::SUbtØtåL Administration TotBi I S r----- .--.---'- Arts & Special Events Arts Commission Community Recreation Red, White & Blue "...................:~ÞtôtiU" Administration TotBi TOTAL RECREATION Dumas Bay Centre P3 Carryforward - Arts Comm. ....'TO'J~(:,:>":::':::::"':":':':": 100.7% 57.1% 86.2% 77.8% .:):.¡ìJ.%'.:. 79.1% 7U% 81.0% 102.4% 100.0% 0.0% ...;~.. 12 62.2% 0.9% 76.1% 46.9% .;:"~.': nla 33.1% 40.0% 100.0% nla nla .P:..~ft. . . P P P . . P PP' . P ":":':'PP"P"" :': 59.5% 2.4% 74.5% 72.0% ?I.¡"¡'¡ nla 37.3% 42.6'4 99.1% nIa nIB ::Q;~ " City of Federal Way November 1897 Monthly Financial Report SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Community Development Block Grant Fund The CDBG Fund accounts for the receipt and disbursement of federal grants received through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD awarded the City a total of $554,518 in 1997. CDBG 1997 revised budget totals $670,304 (excluding projects managed by KC) of which $426,173 or 63.6% has been expended through the end of November. : TAaa1t : .. "~nr J2fVIC.OMINT"OC( MAim ~....",.",.. v..,. ,.,., _øme I!dItnm ,AIIOCaIIatt 1"1 fN' fiN 1..4 1..5 IBM 1111 (rhMpJ .8Mnn CITY ADMINISTERED PROGRAMS I!nuaenwnt I'U nclS- rants CDBG 1991 S 305 000 S (60 083 S (116 392) I S (63 652 S (54076)1 s (18174)1 $ 7377 $ - CDBG 1992 320,000 (24,120), (184,748 (73,510) I (49,874)1 12,252 - CDBG 1993 456,000 (319,200 (56,431)1 (79,991\ I (378 - Consortium funds -indirect !'ederal Grants CDBG 1994 372,554 (88,425) (202,020 (302 (61,600 20,207 CDBG 1995 306,402 (90,718 (106,791 44,806 153,699 CDBG 1996 219,943 (92,849 127,094 CDBG 1997 375,956 (426,173 (50,217 StIÞ4Dt8I IS 2,355,855 , ....'Il,Ol3 II 11.,,1!) , 1$81.- , . (m""'2~$ (440,777 $. (ZOO.»o~ $ 14.,1731 $ 2,835 $ 250.783 Food Bank Wer8house - 94 70,000 (56,731 (11,889) 1,380 Housing Rehab-94 26,804 (26,804\ - Housing Assistance - 95 19,306 (9,653) (7,864) 1,789 Buiding Upgrade-95 20 ,000 (10,000) (9,879 121 Transitional Housina - 95 29,500 29500 Buiding RenCMltion-95 31,500 (13,450\ (13,360 4,670 Roar RØDlace. - 95 8,500 (4,250) (4,250) Shelter for Homeless - 95 50 ,000 (25,000 (19,385) 5,615 Housing Rehab - 95 125,000 (1 25, 000) Housing Assistance - 96 19,336 (18,986) 350 Shelter for HcmeIess - 96 150 000 (134 000) (13245 2755 Hightine Calleae . 96 30,148 30,148 Housing Rehab - 96 170,000 (140,106) (29,894 - Housing Rehab. 97 170,000 (88,277 81,723 AIDS Housing dWA-97 10,000 10,000 Easter Seal Society - 97 18,250 (18,000 250 Housing Authoritv - 97 25 000 25 000 Men18I He8Ith Housing - 97 11,183 11,183 W.Wiey R8'oAtaIization - 97 150, 000 (37,979 112,021 Unll8d CenIbraI Palsy . 97 15,000 I 15,000 SU...... .,.. $t.1""'27 - $..1 $ '.-1 ' (111,084 :t~~.': . - $ 331,605 ::rM<'" '.'1IØ8 If,:'" ":.f,,:;,.' T " ~i .$,. :$ :UM $::: ,m- ..." ,::$.::;1;:1 " .. " " . .."I:11UI., "". " Note: 1992 ~1I'IdIUes W8f8l1(Ulted \0 relied S22. 1!iO in ineligible cost; 1994 ~ do ncllndude $28,528 In GerweI Fund c:om1bUt1cns1cr mlnt..- purchase, 13 .. City of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report t Public Works - Contracted Services Table 13 presents a year-to-date analysis of the Public Works and Surface Water Management (SWM) contracts with King County, WSDOT and private vendors. Expenditure accruals have been made for November activity. Most on-going maintenance takes place during the spring and summer months. TABLE 13 . PUBUCWORKS - CONTRACTED SERVICES .Exø8nclltul'a ...... m ...... ...lJutløet . Actual " Expedited Plan Review (1) $ 25,000 $ 14,930 59.7% Contracted Plan Review (1) 20,000 34,415 172.1% lilubtotal Development ServIC88 $ ... ;41,000 $ 48,344 109.7% Neighborhood Safety (1) 10,000 1,140 11.4% T rafficIT ransportation 16,214 16,399 101.1% Traffic Maintenance - KC 307,600 271,456 88.2% I Tratftc 8erv1ce8 .. $ 333,814 $ . 288,995 86.6% Street Maintenance - Private Contractors (2) 640,725 630,667 98.4% Street Maintenance - WSDOT 123,037 96,281 78.3% Structure Maintenance (3) 97,467 97,025 99.5% Subtotal 8tNet Sy8t8ma $ 861,229 $ 823,972 95.7% Solid Waste Litter Control 45,100 44,016 97.6% Subtotal Solid Waite $ 41,100 $ 44,016 97.6% Water Utility Billing - KC 60,000 55,601 92.7% State Highway Maintenance - WSDOT 61,500 44,279 72.0% Water Analysis (1) 24,500 9,213 37.6% Str. Sweeping, Catch Basin, Manhole & Pipes (1) 251,400 217,415 86.5% Total Surface Water Management $ 397,400 $ 326,509 82.2% Snow & Ice Removal (1) 60,000 32,585 54.3% Snow & Ice Removal - Lakehaven Utility District 10,000 9,043 90.4% Subtotal Snow & Ice Removal $ 70,000 $ 41,627 59.5% Total Contractual Servlcee $ 1,752,543 $ 1,574,4&3 89.8% (1) Private Contractors (2) Private Contracts for street maintenance ($470,292), supplies ($37,000), R/IN vegetation mowing and tree maintenance ($93,200), Weyerhaeuser ($26,233), and Pavement Management System ($14,000). (3) Private contractors for sidewalk, ramps, curb and gutter maintenance ($83,696) and fences, guardrail, barriers and retaining wall maintenance ($6,671). CAPITAL PROJECTS UPDA TE CIP - 1997 GO Sond accounts for the capital projects funded with the 1997 GO Bonds. CIP - Paries accounts for the acquisition or construction of major park capital facilities except those facilities financed by proprietary funds. CIP - SWAt accounts for major capital facilities associated with managing the existing storm water conveyance systems, regulating the clearing, grading and erosion control phases of new land development, constructing, maintaining and repairing elements of the City's drainage system, and controlling water quality within the system. CIP - Traffic accounts for improvements to existing traffic signals and new signalization. CIP - Streets accounts for improvements of roadways and arterials, including the construction of new street sections, the purchase of rig ht-of-ways , the widening of roadways to provide additional vehicle lanes, and the installation of sidewalks and landscaping. Funding sources include transfers from the SWM Fund ($2,055,886), CDBG ($200,000), Donations Fund ($2,046), General Fund ($211,921) and Street CIP Fund ($396,256); mitigation fees ($491,967); grants ($4,210,484); interest earnings ($222,451); King County Bonds ($49,000); Open Space Proceeds ($264,683); Public Works Trust Fund Loan ($149,692); School District ($8,482); GO Bond Proceeds ($14,670.700) and beginning fund balance ($14,086,654). GO Bond interest earnings ($112,451) has been allocated to prefund debt service at this time. Table 13 represents year-to-date expenditures through November 1997. Llfe-to- date Impact fees collected through November 1997 total $1,804,245 which includes interest earnings. Currently, a balance of $311,415 is reserved for Parks, Traffic, Street and SWM capital improvements projects. 14 City of Federal Way November 1897 Monthly Financial Roport PROJECT UPDA TE Parks: 1) Dumas Bay Civic Theater: Demolition completed, contractor starting to pour concrete footings for the theatre; 2) Dumas Bay Centre Signage: Interpretive signs completed, Eagle Scout and volunteers installed signs November 27-29; 3) Community and Neighborhood Parks projects are: Lake Killamey Master Plan: SEPA/Enviromental check list completed, construction scheduled for Summer 1998; Lake Grove School Ball Field Renovation: Project completed; Heritage Woods Park: Project completed; Mark Twain Ball Field Renovation: Project completed; 4) BPA Phase II: Completed; 5) Celebration Park: Remediation work completed. SWM: 1) Culvert Upgrade and the SeaTac Mall Detention projects Phase I are designed and property acquisition is nearly complete. Project construction has been delayed until 1998 due to a hearing examiner appeal.; 2) S 356th Regional Storage Facility construction was completed in November 1997. Contractor is working on punch list items; 3) CIP studies Phase II is underway; 4) SW 336th retention modification began construction in early August of 1997; 5) Work for SeaTac Mall Phase II design has begun. 85% design completion to Council is anticipated for March 1998. 6) Annual Programs: Alder Brook retention modification was completed August 1; Mirror Lake Hydraulic Analysis Study was completed October 1997. Meeting with Mirror Lake Home Owner Association is scheduled for December 11, 1997; Storm Water System Operation & Maintenance Manual has been finalized; Westfork Hylebos Stream Rehabilitation construction has been completed. Kitts Comer/South 356th Regional Storage Facility repair of primary detention cell was completed in November 1997. Traffic: 1) The contracts are being processed for S. Star Lake Road/Military Road S. signal and SW 34Oth St/Hoyt Road SW signal; SW 334th Street and 21st Ave SW signal and S. 32Oth Street and Hwy 99 signal the scope of work for the contracts are under negotiation. Street: 1) S 356th-SR 99 to 1st Ave project is under final design; working with Parks on the wetland mitigation; right of way acquisition has also begun for the PSE parcel; 2) 23rd Ave $ project ($ 317th to S 324th) final design was approved by LUTC and at the 12/3/96 Council. TIB has approved a grant for $3.3M for construction. We have requested WSDOT provide Right of Way acquisition services for this project; 3) S 312th St-SR 99 to 23rd Ave S project final design phase was approved at the 11/18/96 LUTC meeting, right of way appraisals are complete and staff is currently working with the utility companies on relocation; purchase and sale agreements are being reviewed by the legal department. Purchase and sale agreements are also being presented to property owners along S. 312th Street by the negotiator hired by the City. Of the 27 parcels, 11 are complete; 4) $. 32Oth Street Downtown Core and Frame Improvements, reviewing scope of work for the contract; 5) BPA Trail Phase II construction bids were opened 2/25/97 and the project was awarded to Westmark Construction 3/18/97 in the amount of $460,708. Construction began 5/27/97. Work was completed on 10/31/97 and will be going to Council in January 1998 for acceptance; 6) The S.W 336th Street (from 21st to 26th) Project was awarded to R. W. Scott at the 7/15/97 Council Meeting in the amount of $1,888,468 and construction started August 8. Underground utilities and the two ponds are complete, working on the road, the south side is almost complete; 7) 21st Ave SWand SW Dash Point Road Traffic Signal bids were received 6/17/97 and Transtech Electric was the low bidder; the project was awarded at the 7/1/97 Council Meeting and construction began August 25, currently finishing signal project almost complete; 8) 8th Ave SWand SW Dash Point Road Traffic Signal design is complete and the appeal was denied regarding SEPA; 9) Military Road South from South 284th Street to South 286th Street Improvement Project was awarded at the 7/15/97 Council Meeting to Pivetta Brothers and construction began August 25, 1997. All work has been completed, scheduled to go to Council in January 1998 for acceptance; 10) 21st Avenue SW and SW 325th Street Traffic Signal and Street Improvement bids were received June 1997. The low bidder was Tucci and Son's. The contract was awarded at the 7/1/97 Council Meeting, the pre-construction meeting was held 7/10/97 and construction started August 18. Working on final paving and channelization, will be going to Council in January 1998 for acceptance; 11) The 1997 Sidewalk Replacement Project ($79,948) was awarded to KODO Construction at the 6/17/97 Council Meeting, construction started August 28, 1997, work is complete; 12) The 30% Design Plans and authorization to acquire right of way was approved by Council on 11/18/97 for the S. 304th Street and Military Road Signal Project. 15 city of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report TMLE M GlATAL ....~ fIIIOÆCTIS :)(::'~:':::~::~::::,;'\(::~';\.:r~'."':::~::~::~(::~::;';-;:::';.:::\::::: ;':;.:\::::,:-~)~,:~:~,:(:,::'i: ':~.;.:;;::::::~~.~:~:.~~7~:/:::in:~'~ ::F::':':::.::~~::,: .." CIP -1997 GO Bond8 101 Public SlIe1y .,500,000 - 5M78 nil 102 Downtown R8llftallzaUon 1,900,000 - 23,.2. nil 10. Opportunity Fund 725,000 - 8,938 n/a ~::~ ~\ \ ~ ~ /~ :// /œ ~~ ~~W: ~ ...:~:: ~ ://~::: ~:~ ://:>ï:'::: ~:::~ ~:~ ~~:: ~~::::::: ::: :::~ :~~:: ¥ \ \:~::::'::::::~ ~:: ~: ~:~ ~~ :~: /~:::~: ~:~ :~n~ ::::: \ :/::::::::::~:: \ \\:ïi~'" /~ 't//: \::: / / ~: ~ :~: /~ /: M CIP - PARCS 101 Open SPlIce ProJ- S 2&',683 S 130,000 S ~,~6 35.7'M. 102 SIple Pari< 12U89 50,000 32,616 65.2'1' 103 S1It8I Lake Pari< - - n/a 106 BPA TraM O_lopment - Pha..11 595,~ 595,.35 ~,273 83.0' 108 School SIte Improvements 31.,012 31.,012 .16,863 132.8 109 ProPII!ty AcquialUon 370,700 300,865 300,865 100.0' 112Netghbo_Parlal 112,970 30,000 17,1103 58.7'M. 11. Calebrallon Pari< 7,<193,567 1,000,000 890,252 89.0'11 115 Klahanee La. COmmuntty/Senior Cantler 158,000 120,000 123,5304 102.9'11 121 Oumas Pari< 6,233 6,233 1,668 26.8'M. )////?:::,:~(:::::::(:::j_:$,~i~~::':'~:::'::t\~:~:~:~f::=:\: '.~??:':'::~:~:~:::\\,,¡¡~:: :~:~:::\:::~:?:::(:::".;~~jC:j)~::::\:::\:~::'?í'îïfi~: :::://:??\\:~:::,::,)::~..~~ CIP.SWM 111 Small Cllpltal Projects S 370,366 $ 370,366 S 239,330 604.6'11 210 Panther Lake 11,801 5,000 300 6.0'11 213 SeaTac Mall Detention 3,218,.78 350,000 177,579 50.7'11 21. 338th Street Detention 1.s,800 1.s,800 1.s,800 100.0'11 220 338th Kitto Corner 155,359 135,000 98,678 73.1'11 2.0 S 356Ih Regtonal Storage 2,555,500 1,97.,569 1,967,371 99.6'11 310 CIP Studl.. 73,915 20,000 19,350 96.8'11 /::::~ :~: ~~ ': ~ '/ /~: ~: ~ :~:~:~: ~'\ ~ií'.* t~ ~..:~ ~~:~: ~~ ~:\:~:~::':': /::~~~ ~~:: '::/ ~ ,~:: '//:: ~ \ ://tR~ Hf:', / /::~ \ ~/ /Qiit m:::ï \ ~: ~:~ \:: \ ': ~ttü¡jl_' ::::: ~:: ~:tt::~ :~~: ~ \ ~ '~:t::::::... CIP-TI'8Iflc Transf8raOlttoOeÞtSeNtce S 86,"32 $ S 72,77. nil 10. SR99 Signal 288th to 3004th 52,532 51,569 12,502 2..2'1' IO5SR99 Signal 3561hto32.th 110,596 - - n/a 106 21atA..nue Q &W 325th SIgnal 779,O!M .59,036 "',153 96.8'11 107 SW ~Oth Q 35th A.. SIgnal 23,568 23,568 .,538 19.3'11 I08DashPolntRd.Q8thAvenueSW 306,290 117,928 25,195 2U'll 109 Dash PolntRd Q 21stAvenueSW .96,11. ~7,801 286,035 61.1'11 111 Nor>-molorlzed CIP Projects 12,990 - - n/a 112 SW Campus Drive Q 6th Ave. SW 2«,337 2«,337 225,6040 92.3'11 113S336thQSR99-COns!.RHTL 535,7.6 83,150 32,128 50.9'11 11. Military Rd & Star Lalœ Signal 180,776 - - n/a ~'::~::\\\t///t~':::~:~:ø.~~,_::':~'~~:::~:~:~~::::~:::):t~t :,:~~~\:/:\:~{t:::t;~m: ,j':"':::..... .'::R~'~":~:~~~\\~\::::~~~--='::::~\~\}\\::::~}::~W"~ CIP-..l881a Tranef8raOlttoOeÞtSeNtce $ 109,711 $ - $ 217,863 n/a 102 S 356th1SR99 to 1st Ave, 362,508 362,508 255,962 70.6'11 I06SWS338thQ21stto27\11AveSW 2,1~,256 2,021,230 1,2.6,315 61.7'11 109 317th- 326th, 23rd Ave. S 1,1~,331 125,100 91,707 73.3'14 112 S M81M-5 to SR99 30,727 30,727 - O.O'M 113312thSlISR99-23rdAve. .,535,012 1,353,000 93,315 6.9'11 115 Military Rd. S./286th 10 3004\11 Ave 1,152,<138 5304,000 391,.26 73.3'14 116 S 356Ih Q SR99 - COns!. RHTL 122,065 122,065 - O.O'M 118 B.. Zone Accealbility 22,000 22,000 - O.O'M 119 Dash Point ChannelIzation 5,603 5,603 678 12.1'14 121 373rd ~eÞ08 Brtdge Rehab 60,000 60,000 19,108 31.8'11 ~:: ~:l:~:t~::::l:':': ':~:::::~: ::1.: 'ii i.it ::::~ ~:~:~: H:~~:::: ::~::::::::: ::::'t ¡::& ~:::::::::~:~ ~~ :~~~~:~tt~..",....,...:...:.....: ~: ~j~: ~~~:: ~:: t:::: H::::~ :~:ií_-f:.::::::~:~ ~~~ j ~~:~:~ ~: ::::::;::ã:fim:::: t~:~:~:~ ~~ ~~ ~: ~::::~~:~:: ~.~. ~'~~:: :::::: :..W Dum- B8y c.nt.. Deferred Maintenance 69,239 69,239 32,331 ~.7'M. FEMA 3,906 3,906 2,875 73.6% 102 CMc TheatrelO\her 1,85ð,002 720,000 532,567 7..0'11 103 Restroom Improvements 138,736 138,736 11.,176 82.3'M. 10. BaHmentlmprovements .,67. .,67. .,616 98.7'M. 105 Parking Lot (Phs.. 1) 200,000 150,000 7,5M 5.1'M. 106 ADA Improvem.nts «,838 «,838 - 0.0'11 :::\ '/::::: ~:: ~ ~ r~ ,~~~: ~~ ~ ~: ~::::t ~~iiiW.Ii,íMO,¡¡j¡: \~: ~ ~~~ ~:~~:: ::::':'r::::: :::: t'r ',::::?~ ,:~:::: ~:~:~::'~::~ :::~,~:~ ~.:::'::: ':': ttt:: ::? t..~- n.. \ '(::::::: :?:r/: t"(~.:'::::: ~ ~:::': tt::~:: t :::::: ~:: ::: ~~~ Overlay Program 2,091,861 2,091,861 1,802,556 76.6'!4, T"OIII" C8III8I ~ . ".'."1 I 2,111',- . ',"'" ; 71." CI"G~1'at.. . ......7. . M.m,... . tUru",! '1'1,1'" 16 city of Federal Way November 1997 Monthly Financial Report OTHER STATISTICS Cash and Investments The total invested balance at the end of November is $47,179,384 which includes $23,225,485 in the State Investment Pool (SIP). The State Investment Pool securities consisted of Repurchase Agreements (46.49%), U.S. Agency Securities (42.69%), U.S. Treasury Securities (3.49%), and Certificates of Deposit (.79%) and Commercial Paper (6.54%). The average maturity of securities in the portfolio was 161 days. November's average portfolio net eamings rate was 5.75%, which has not changed from the previous month. The travel advance account, petty cash/change funds, and investigative funds are $5,000, $3,360, and $6,729 respectively. Per policy, the basis used by the City to determine whether market yields are being achieved shall be the range between the average six-month U.S. Treasury Bill (5.33%) and the State Investment Pool (5.51 %). Table 15 summarizes investment portfolio through November. Table 15 INVESTMENTS Setrlement Investment M a furl ry Yield to Tv"e Date Par Amount Cost Date Matuntv Treasury Note 5/16/96 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,002,578 05/15/98 6.13% Agency - FNMA 5/16/96 $ 1,000,000 $ 982,031 03/12/99 5.55% Certificate of Deposit 8/29/96 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2/17/98 5.98% Treasury Note 09/03/96 $ 1,000,000 $ 999,375 8/31/98 6.16% Treasury Note 11/18/96 $ 1,000,000 $ 999,219 11/30/97 5.45% Agency - FNMA 1/10/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,003,460 1/12/98 5.69% Treasury Note 2/20/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 995,703 2/28/98 5.56% Treasury Note 2/20/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 985,469 2/15/99 5.78% Treasury Note 4/2/97 $ 1,000 000 $ 1,001,641 4/30/99 6.41% Treasury Note 4/2/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 990,000 4/30/98 6.09% Agency - FHLB 5/22/97 $ 1,050,000 $ 1,050,483 5/21/99 6.27% Treasury Note 5/22/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,002,656 5/15/99 6.23% Bankers' Acceptance 6/4/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 972,100 12/01/97 5.82% Aaencv - FNMA 6/4/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,011,094 7/13/98 5.94% Treasury Note 6/4/97 $ 1 ,000 000 $ 1,003,594 7/31/98 5.92% Bankers' Acceptance 8/8/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 974,113 1/26/98 5.67% Certificate of Deposit 8/8/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 8/10/98 5.93% Treasury Note 8/14/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,002,188 9/30/98 5.79% Treasury Note 8/14/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,859 8/15/99 5.95% FNMA 9/24/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,690 9/18/98 5.73% FNMA 9/24/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,002,381 9/17/99 5.89% Banker's Acceptance 10/23/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 973,993 4/10/98 5.77% Certificate of Deposit 10/23/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 10/19/98 5.93% FNMA 11/14/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,274 11/12/99 5.80% Averaae Maturitv 297 Averaae Yield to Maturitv 5.96% Average Yield - 6 mo. T-Bill 5.33% State Investment Pool $ 23,225,485 1 day 5.51% Average Portfolio Maturity & Yield 151 5.74% :rotal tnvesiml!nts . $ 47,179.384 17 Actu8. 1997 RevlHcl Budget Actuals Varlance I . 1bIOugh Through Favorable Unfavorable) 1M3 IBM 1..5 1816 Annual November November Dollars IS) P8n:ent""{"k Sevlnnlng Fund Balance $ 12,870,618 $ 12,181,738 $ 11,403,627 $ 10,331,541 $ 10,386,188 $ 10,386,188 $ 10,386,188 $ - 0.0% Operating Revenues Property Taxes 5,027,562 5,515,977 5,786,231 5,970,665 6,119,886 5,521,780 5,521,780 . 0.0% Sales Tax 6,762,817 6,952,417 7,271,448 7,390,326 8,384,794 7,543,876 7,553,623 9,747 0.1% Criminal Justice Sales Tax 906,786 973,341 1,005,937 1,043,249 1,126,861 1,036,723 1,157,841 120,918 11.7% leasehold Excise Tax . 4,380 12,929 3,968 14,420 13,218 3,571 (9,847) -73.0% State-Shared Revenues 4,417,678 4,893,546 4,652,775 4,266,498 4,405,685 3,871,355 4,045,852 174,497 4.5% Real Estate Excise Tax 1,203,517 1,121,464 999,685 1,299,068 1,100,000 992,323 1,610,146 617,823 62.3% Gambling Taxes 245,196 351,454 325,989 338,832 347,438 376,390 339,156 (37,234) -9.9% Utility Taxes - - - 719,799 3,468,705 2,931,971 3,377,058 445,087 15.2% lFines & Forfeitures 506,443 547,370 567,828 526,971 663,163 592,914 583,118 (9,796) -1.7% Building PennitslFees-CD 582,502 547,479 578,248 535,784 800,308 679,696 887,291 7,595 1.1% ROW PennitslFees-PW 111,774 118,660 156,037 178,598 222,136 199,618 169,775 (29,843) -15.0% licenses 66,498 62,900 56,966 57,076 92,700 60,953 51,497 (9,456) -15.5% Franchise Fees 359,946 384,105 386,005 406,479 445,327 407,940 463,232 55,292 13.6% Recreation Fees 309,232 389,136 372,238 377,861 452,157 392,125 385,530 (6,595) -1.7% Dumas Bay Centre - 108,267 201,868 259,110 309,982 284,305 318,300 33,995 12.0% Interest Eamings 443,377 599,762 609,170 564,172 757,559 636,262 611,431 (24,831) -3.9% Admin Fee-SVIIM & Solid Waste - - 137,852 141,989 162,734 149,173 149,173 - 0.0% SVIIM Fees 2,865,628 2,939,139 2,952,011 2,934,767 2,914,559 2,676,639 2,676,639 - 0.0% Refuse Collection Fees 129,608 137,859 133,825 131,931 144,024 135,330 131,282 (4,048) -3.0% Police . - - - - 696,715 696,715 - 0.0% Grants 45,471 - 39,045 284,436 538,821 465,532 465,532 - 0.0% Other 128,603 46,596 58,487 73,085 48,729 49,573 49,573 - 0.0% otalOpersUng R.".nun 24.112,838 25;1173,852 .,304,57" 27.SM,"" 32,511,'" 29.714,411 31,0.&7.915 1.333,SM ,1.5% Operating expenditures City Council 197,758 180,658 184,404 174,755 190,510 187,397 178,402 8,995 4.8% City Manager 231,746 345,710 423,854 497,352 522,680 492,924 486,057 6,867 1.4% Management Services 955,849 1,017,083 1,140,856 1,404,702 1,563,996 1,374,761 1,240,990 133,771 9.7' Civil legal Services 320,407 305,270 406,513 478,996 471,042 431,176 485,135 (53,959) -12. çriminallegal Services 525,547 557,931 598,828 860,365 930,598 714,839 678,671 36,168 5.1',. Comm. Developement Services 3,256,945 2,900,381 3,254,608 2,624,183 2,801,871 2,586,900 2,303,170 283,730 11.0% Police Services 7,023,302 7,550,096 7,558,520 8,930,194 9,837,586 9,353,762 8,831.900 521,862 5.6% ~ail Services 486,241 595,352 515,162 636,261 782,000 712,132 689,850 22,282 3.1% Parlls & Recreation 3,049,619 2,878,054 2,844,634 3,010,592 2,788,846 2,694,408 2,397,231 297,177 11.0% Public WOr1ls 2,301,410 2,202,816 2,412,940 2,860,807 3,134,269 2,884,340 2,729,623 154,716 5.4% !city Overlay Program 1,959,044 650,914 529,695 863,333 2,091,861 1,602,556 1,602,556 - 0.0% Snow & Ice Removal (1) - 8,723 6,844 62,057 84,738 42,369 56,292 (13,923) -32.9% Solid Waste 122,287 131,896 183,070 284,175 587,287 511,133 446,448 64,685 12.7% Surface Water Management 1,108,565 1,018,886 1,245,103 1,490,808 1,546,349 1,435,060 1,287,857 147,204 10.3% Debt Service 12,457,924 526,054 1,787,279 1,717,049 3,010,304 719,379 719,379 - 0.0% Dumas Bay Centre 35,183 181,063 278,473 353,183 374,389 356,645 376,476 (19,831) -5.6% Non-departmental (2) 132,020 8,410 25,033 25,033 691,312 - . - nla otal Ope res " 21.0119.295 23.375,818 ae,o13,825 ;51.-,218 ø,U1I1I"e;¡: 24,510,031 1..9,7045 8.1% ¡ojIerstlng"'R.8YenuiS OY8I1(uncl8r) OperstlnaExIl8f1ClItu1'88 . .' (10,O$1,ZOt) 4,8U.5117 2.U8,9$11 1,430,839 1.110,770 ~"1....2t 8,537,878 2,923,2049 SO.9% Other Financing Sources - - - - 7,585,690 4,368,938 4,368,938 - 0.0% Pther Financing Usn 7,798,260 3,455,742 5,437,247 5,577 ,297 8,591,173 3,578,519 3,578,519 - 0.0% Ending Fund Balance Solid Waste 94,500 111,484 188,505 213,050 237,114 - 279,992 nla nla Snow & Ice - . 191,274 103,239 100,000 - 96,524 nIB nIl Arterial Street 1,465,904 1,563,648 971,893 362,100 69,831 - 497,146 nIB nIl Utility Tax - - - - - - 2,365,943 nla nIB SVIIM 2,503,855 2,018,324 1,702,890 1,077,666 957,881 - 2,811,880 nIl nIl Path & Trails 20,048 29,109 39,284 50,210 3,310 - 13,698 nIB nla Strategic Reserve 2,000,000 2,150,560 2,104,645 2,050,477 2,000,000 - 2,021,782 nla nla Debt Service 1,436,785 1,657,809 1,936,991 1,618,909 4,032,090 - 4,470,635 nIl nla Dumas Bay Centre - 562,861 157,897 115,131 - - 39,739 nIB 'II' Police - - 1,031,439 - 305,207 - 305,207 nIB 1'3 - - . - 300,000 - 300,000 nIB r. Interfund loans 60,000 60,000 10,000 - 10,000 - 10,000 nIB nIB Unreserved (12,559,943) 5,188,758 560,520 594,301 2,466,042 . 4,510,938 nIB nla rfotal EndinG Fund Balance " 1$1""78.851 113,340 553 $ 8,895,338 . $8,185,083 $ 10,501."75 S 1".801,236 1$ 17,724,485 $ 2,923,2<19 19.8% ATTACHMENT A CITY OF FEDERAL WAY SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES OPERATING FUNDS Through November 1893 . 1997 Note 1: These expenditures occur primarily during the winter months. Note 2: Includes contingency, unallocated 1'3 and vision premiums. 12/29/973:26 PM . ..~. ~'!.. !.~~_.T!.~!!:.._.~~!t- ~-¿CJ.. q ?_--..- ..._...!.!!~! :Jf / c C~J_---- .................". CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Councll AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT AND EXCLUDING FROM CIVIL SERVICE TIlE RANK OF POLICE COMMANDER. (AMENDS ...Q~~~Ç.~~..~Q~..~?:~~.~.. ~..~Q~..~~.:~.~~t.._......._....._._..................................... .................... ........... CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: CONSENT XXORDINANCE BUSINESS BEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION - 0 TJlliK Amount Budgeted: $0.00 Expenditure Amt: $0.00 Contingency Reqd: $0.00 ...." ...... ............, .........,. .................., """.""'."'..."'" """"'."".'" ..,..... .......................................,.... ...................., "" ............................. ...................................."... A TT A CBMENTS: Proposed Amended Ordinance ...........................................................,.."'.....".".".'."""""""""""'...""."'...-.....................................................................,.........,. .......................,.... .....,.. ""'" SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Federal Way Police Departmeat ... received approval of and funding for positions of Police Commander. The Public SafetylHuman Services Commlft~ approved this amendment at its December 4,1997 meeting. This amendment is a housekeeping item wbicb amends the ordinance which dictates the exclusion of certain Police Department ranks from Civil Service and includes the rank of Police Commander as an excluded rank. """"""""""""".""""".""""'.""'.""""..."'..""."'..."..""'.."..""""'.""""""""'.."'..."'..".........................................................,.......................................,. ....... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Public SafetylHuman Services Committee recommended at its December 4, 1997 meeting that this item be passed on to the full City Council Cor ...~P.P.r.9.!~~................................................".""""""'."""'."""."..."."".."'..""."'.."'...".'."""'.'."""'.""."""""""""""""'."'""'..""""""""""""""""'" ...., ...~~~-~-~.~~~~~~~:._.~:_=~~--~.~--A;)f~, ......... ...... APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: (j?1v' (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY cm CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNcn.. ACfION: APPROVED DENIED - T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION COUNCIL BILL /I ORDINANCE /I RESOLUTION' /d~ COVBP.CC-711$/97 IF7 1:¿/I&/q7 .' DRAFT /2-/ t?/1 7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNC;IL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT AND EXCLUDING FROM CIVIL SERVICE THE RANK OF POLICE COMMANDER. (AMENDS ORDINANCES NO. 95-244 AND NO. 96-258) WHEREAS, the Federal Way City Council recognizes the need for the Department of Public Safety to establish the rank of Police Commander; and WHEREAS, the Federal Way Civil Service Commission has decided that Police Commanders should be excluded from civil service; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment to Civil Service Ordinance. The Federal Way City Code, Chapter 2, Article 3 shall be amended as follows: DIVISION 1. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Sec. 2-47. Creation; appointment. There is hereby created a police civil service commission, consisting of five members who shall be appointed by the city manager to exercise the powers and perform the duties established , PAGE 1 ORD # .' by this chapter and by state law as set forth in Chapter 41.12 RCW in connection with the selection, appointment, promotion, demotion and employment of police officers commissioned pursuant to RCW 43.101.200, unless exempt pursuant to RCW41.06.070. The rank of . police chief, director of police servicesL ~ assistant or deputy to such chief or director, and commander shall be exempt from civil service pursuant to RCW 42.12.050 in recognition of the management authority delegated to such positions. Noncommissioned full-time, part-time or seasonal employees of the police department, such as police support officers, community service officers, identification technicians, property / evidence room technicians, record clerks, dispatchers and administration assistants shall be excluded from civil service pursuant to RCW 41.12.010 and RCW 41.12.220 and/or in recognition that the ci ty will create an orderly system of personnel administration to cover such employees. The commissioners shall serve without compensation, provided however, that they may be reimbursed for expenses incurred in service as a commissioner. Section 2. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. ORD # , PAGE 2 Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after it~ passage, approval, and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this day of , 1997. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MARLON S. PRIEST ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, LONDI K. LINDELL FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. K:\ORDIN\CIVLSERV.123 ORD # , PAGE 3 IlEBTIIiG DATB: JwWLU?j (¡;, /qq~ ITEM' -;JiLL ~) .... .... ........ .... ..... ....................................................,..... ..... ...... "....."...'."."..".' ... - ""'" ."'.'.."""..."'... ..... ..... ................ ....,.. ............ ............... ...... .......... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT: SUB D IVISI ONe ODE AMENDMENTS .,.... ... ....................... ....... ........,.............. ..... ".""'... .""....".'..." m..... ..... ....... .... "-" . ...................., ...... ..... ......................... . . ...... ...............,...... .. m . .... m... CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: ~ CONSENT X ORDINANCE BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION STAFF REPORT PROCLAMATION STUDY SESSION 0 mER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ ........... '.."""..'" ....... ....... .""'. ....... ....... ....... "....' ....... ""... ......, ....... .................... -.. ..... .,...... .,... ..... ..... ."""'" ..... ............. ..... '."'."" '.'.."".."'.'" .......... . .... ATTACHMENTS: 1) Ordinance 2) November 24th memorandum (McClung) to LUTC 3) October 28th memorandum (Largen) to the LUTC 4) October 14th memorandum (McClung) to the LUTC .5) Planning Commi~~ion Findings 6) Staff Report to PI~mning Commi~ion ..",......... "..""".'" .... ............ .... ... ... .. .. .... ......... ........ "." ..... . ... . .... . ...",. """.""",.".""...,.",.."".",...""""",...,.",...."""..,."" . ..............",.. .. . ."'.""'" ...",. no SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The City Council Land Use and Transportation Committee recommended at their December 1st meeting, approval of the attached amendments to the Subdivision Code. The Land Use Committee met on this issue on October 20, November 3rd and 17th and December 3rd and toured projects on October 28th. The Planning Commission conducted public meetings on this issue on June 4, June 18 and August 20, 1997. . .. no...... no... .. . no .. . . .. ".'.""'.'" . no . . .... .. .. ... .. . .... .... . .... .. .. no ... .. .. ... . ... .. .. .. .. . . ..... .. ." ... .. ..........,.......... .. .. .. .. ....",.......... . ........... .. ... . m ....,.. no . .. .. .... .. .. m . m.. .. .. no.. CITY COUNCIL COMMI'ITEE RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission and amended by the LUTC. ... ~~;:;. ~ ~.~;:;.;;;~.~~;; ~ ~ ~~~..... fj; ~..~:;;¡.: .::::.:... ë: ... ~ ;;; d .. ~~:;¿ ~:;; . ........ ... .... .... ~....... . ....." ......", . .. ...,.... "'.".'.'.."".""."'.""""'."".".""". ... ... .. ... .. '" .. .... no ... ... . ".' ""."""""""""."""."""..""'...." m ......... ... ...." It..~.. ~ .l4~.. .. . . ... .. .. .. . ... .,.. no (jJp APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED - TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION # IRtf /Jj/~/q7 . . ORDINANCE NO. DRAFT /~9(77 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON. AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE FEDERAL WAY SUBDIVISION CODE, ADOPTING SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS AND ADDING NEW REGULATIONS FOR CLUSTER SUBDIVISIONS. A. WHEREAS amendments to the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) text are authorized pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-217 pursuant to Process IV review; and B. WHEREAS the Federal Way City Council has considered proposed changes to the FWCC regarding specific subdivision regulations; and c. WHEREAS the Federal Way City Council, pursuant to FWCC 22-517, having determined the Proposal to be worthy of legislative consideration, referred the Proposal to the Federal Way Planning Commission as a priority item for its review and recommendation; and D. WHEREAS the Federal Way Planning Commission, having considered the Proposal at public hearings during 1997 on June 4, June 18, and August 20 pursuant to FWCC Section 22-523, and all public notices having been duly given pursuant to FWCC Section 22-521; and E. WHEREAS the public was given opportunities to comment on the Proposal during the Planning Commission review; and ORD# , PAGE 1 F. WHEREAS the City of Federal Way SEPA responsible official has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on April 27, 1997; and G. WHEREAS following the public hearings, the Planning Commission submitted to the Land Use and Transportation Committee of the City Council its recommendation in favor of proposed subdivision code amendments, adding sections to the FWCC as noted previously; and H. WHEREAS the Federal Way Land Use and Transportation City Council Committee met on October 20th, November 3rd and 17th, and December 1 st, 1997 to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and has moved to forward the Proposal, with amendments, to the full City Council; and I. WHEREAS there was sufficient opportunity for the public to comment on the Proposal; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findinas. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings with respect to the Proposal and the proposed amendments to the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC"): 1. The Federal Way City Council adopted the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan in order to comply with the state's Growth Management Act; and 2. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan contains policies that call for the amending of subdivision regulations to promote innovative and flexible standards in the ORD# , PAGE 2 design and development of new residential subdivisions; and 3. The Federal Way SEPA responsible official has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on April 27, 1997; and 4. The proposed code amendments would not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare; and 5. The Planning Commission, following notice thereof as required by RCW 35A.63.070, held public hearings on the proposed regulatory amendments and has considered the testimony, written comments, and material from the public by and through said hearings. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-217 and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the Proposal: 1. The Proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUP16 Revise existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single family developments and in-fill. LUP19 Consider special development techniques (e.g. accessory dwelling units, zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single family areas provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. I PAGE 3 ORD# LUP20 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, watercourses, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, and lot size averaging. HP14 Amend development regulations to encourage superior design and a greater diversity of housing types and costs through such techniques as incentives, inclusionary zoning, planned unit developments, density bonuses, and transfer of development rights. HP15 Consider zero lot line standards within planned unit developments to create higher density single family neighborhoods with large open space areas. 2. The Proposal bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety and welfare because it implements policies aimed at increasing housing diversity and availability, neighborhood identity and promotes site sensitive development to protect the environment and neighborhood character. Section 3. Amendment. The Federal Way City Code, Chapter 20, is amended to provide as set forth in Attachment A which is attached and by this reference is incorporated herein. Section 4. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. ORD# , PAGE 4 Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from the time of its final passage, as provided by law. of PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,1997. day CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MAHLON S. PRIEST ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, LONDI K. LINDELL FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. ORD# , PAGE 5 ATTACHMENT A " Article I. In General Sec. 20-1. Definitions Binding site plan shall mean a plan drawn to scale processed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and RCW 58.17. Binding site plans are divisions of land for sale or qround lease for commercial er ~ industrial. manufactured home Darks. and condominium uses. Article II Plats DIVISION 4. BINDING SITE PLANS* ---------- *Cross reference(s)--Site plan review procedure, §22-361 et seq. State law reference(s)--Binding site plans, RCW 58.17.035. ---------- Sec. 20-61. Subdivisions requiring binding site plan. Division of any land for sale or lease which is classified for commercial, business, office, or industrial development, or which is to be developed as condominiums or manufactured home 9ark shall be required to obtain an approved binding site plan in accordance with this and other ordinances of the city. Sec. 20-68. Alteration of binding site Ðlan. Alteration of an aDproved binding site Dlan shall follow the same process and requirements set forth in this division for the aDDroval of a bindinq site Dlan. Sec. 20-108.5. Alteration and vacation of short Ðlats. (a) Alteration of an apQroved short Dlat shall follow the same review process used to create a short plat as set forth in Sec. 20-81: EXCEPT that when an alteration involves a public dedication. the alteration shall be processed as provided in Division 9. (b) Vacation of an aDproved short ~lat shall follow the process established as follows: EXCEPT that. when a vacation involves a public dedication. the vacation shall be processed as Drovided in Division 9. 1 (1) A preapplication conference between the proponent and city staff to discuss the circumstances and reasons for the vacation as set forth in Sec. 20-82. (2) Review of the short subdivision vacation application to determine whether or not the application is complete and acceptable for filing. An application for vacation shall include the following: (a) An application for approval of a short subdivision vacation shall be made to the department of community development services upon forms furnished by the city. ApPlications shall be made by the owner or owners of the parcel or parcels of all property encompassed bv the application or by a duly authorized agent. The owner or owners of all parcels to be included must join in or be represented in the application. (b) The application shall include seven ~rints of the approved short subdivision and be accompanied bY a statement setting forth the reasons for vacation. Approval. a~proval with conditions. or denial of the short subdivision vacation by the director of the department of community development services. Filinq of the short subdivision vacation in the office of the county division of records and elections. (3) (4) Division 6. Preliminary Plat Sec. 20-110. content and form of application (8) Preliminary plat certificate not less from a licensed title insurance company. ~ Additional information as required at the director of community development services. than 90 days old the discretion of Division 9. Vacation of Subdivisions Sec. 20-250. Plat vacation apolication. When any person is interested in the vacation of any subdivision that person shall submit an application to request the vacation to the city. (a) Siqnatories. The application shall contain the signatures of the majority of those persons havinq an ownership interest of lots. tracts. parcels. sites or division in the subiect subdivision or a portion to be vacated. If the subdivision is subject to restrictive covenants which were filed at the time of approval of the subdivision. and the a~plication 2 for alteration would result in the violation of a covenant. the application shall contain an aareement sianed by all parties subiect to the covenants ~rovidina that the parties aaree to terminate or alter the relevant covenants to accomplish the purpose of the vacation of the subdivision or portion thereof. (b) Completed application defined. A completed application shall be as required for preliminarv plats. pursuant to FWCC Section 20-107. Sec. 20-251. Acceptance of application. routina. (a) Upon submittal of a completed application for vacation of plat. the department of communitv development services shall transmit at least one cOPV of the application for vacation for review and recommendation to each of the following: (1) Public works department: (2) Lakehaven utilitv District and/or city òf Tacoma Public Utility Department and/or other utility district. as appropriate: (3) Federal Way Fire Department: (4) County de~artment of public health. if septic systems are proposed for sewage disposal: (5) (6) Federal Way School District #210: Building division: and (7) Other individuals or iurisdictions as deemed appropriate by the director. (b) An application for plat vacation shall not be acce~ted for filina for the purpose of official processina until: The director of community development services determines that the applicant has paid all fees and submitted all documents and information as required herein to permit a full public hearina on the merits of the a~plication: and Sec. 20-252. Process for review and notice of pUblic hearina. (1) (a) U~on confirmation bY the director of community development services that the plat vacation apPlication is complete the application shall be processed and reviewed followina the procedures defined in section 20-109 et sea. (b) Notice of the hearing shall be mailed to the ap9ropriate city or county officials if the proposed plat vacation lies within one mile of the adjoinina city or county boundary. and to all 3 aqencies or Drivate companies Dursuant to section 20-251(a) herein. lc) All notices required in this section shall clearlY describe in laYperson's terms the nature of the request. the location of the proDosal. the date. time and location of the hearing. and address and teleDhone number where additional information may be obtained relatiye to the aDDlication. Sec. 20-253. Report to hearina examiner: review. la) No less than seven days Drior to the date of the 9ublic hearing. the department of community develoDment services shall submit to the hearing examiner a written reDort summarizina the application for Dlat vacation. The reDort shall contain. in addition to the requirements in section 20-111. et seg.. the followina information: (1) All communications from other agencies or individuals relating to the aDDlication which were received in time to be included in the reDort to the hearinq examiner. A list of recommendations from the department of community develoDment services. deDartment of public works. and other aDDroDriate departments relatinq to plat vacation aDDroval. (b) The hearing examiner shall review the aDplication in accordance with the procedures stiDulated in Article VII. Process IV Review. (2) Sec. 20-254. city council review. action. City council review of hearing examiner recommendations on aD~lications for Dlat alterations shall be limited to the record of the hearing examiner. oral comments received at the Dublic meetina (so lona as such comments do not raise new issues or information not contained in the examiner's record) and the hearing examiner's report. ARTICLE III. DESIGN CRITERIA. Sec. 20-153. Density. (b) Lots created in under Section 20-154 may be below minimum lot size requirements of chapter 22, provided the total number of lots created does not exceed the number which would be permitted in a conventional subdivision on a site of the same total area, after reservation of required open space. The total number of lots germitted will be calculated by subtracting the required ODen s~ace (15%) and subtractina 20% for streets from the aross land available. then dividing by the minimum lot size of the underlYina zoning district. Sec 20-154. Cluster subdivision. (a) In order to promote open space and the protection of natural 4 features such as trees, wetlands, and other environmentally sensitive areas. lots may be reduced in size and placed in clusters on the site. The aross land area available for cluster subdivisions must be a minimum of two acres. (b) Lots created in a cluster subdivision may be reduced in size below the minimum required in chapter 22, up to 1/2 of the size of the underlying zonina reauirement but in no case smaller than 3600 square feet. ~er lot. provided that minimum yard ðftà setback requirements are met exceDt as allowed for in (d) below. This provision cannot be used toaether with section 22-966 (d) 1 (affordable housina bonus). Buildin~ setsao)c linea fer each lot ahall so sheWß en the face af a cl~ater susdi.ieien plat. (c) Open space created by cluster subdivisions shall be protected from further subdivision or development by covenants filed and recorded with the final plat of the subdivision. (d) Cluster subdivisions can be constructed with provided that no more than two units may share a (e) Any subdivision created by this section must space on-site and it must all be usable. zero-lot lines. common wall. provide all °gen Sec. 20-155. Open Space and recreation. (b) All residential subdivisions shall be required to provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land area of the subdivision site, ar if the site ia five acrea or leaa in size, ap~lioaftts may sec)c alternative methoda of pre.iàift~ the re~ired open apaoe aa permitted by aection 19 41 ot ocq., if acceptaBle te the city; Except for subdivisions created under Section 20-154. a fee-in-lieu payment may be made to satisfy open space requirements at the discretion of the parks director after consideration of the City's overall Dark Dlan. auality. location. and service area of the ODen space that would otherwise be Drovided within the project. The fee-in-lieu of ODen SDace shall be calculated on fifteen Dercent (15%) of the most recent assessed value of the DroDerty. In the absence of an assessment. the market value shall be based on an appraisal conducted by a MAI certified appraiser or another Drofessional aDDraiser apDroved by the parks director. And exceDt for lots within an existina subdivision. where open space was alreadY dedicated or a fee in lieu paid. the percent of ODen SDace reauired will be the difference between the ODen SDace dedicated Drior and 15%. Any fees collected shall be utilized within the park comprehensive ~lan Dlanning area that the sub;ect proDerty falls within. (c) Any combination of open space types may be used to accomplish the total area required to be reserved as follows: Open Space % of Gross Land Category Area Usable 10% minimum " 5 Conservation Buffer Constrained No maximum or minimum 2% maximum 2% maximum An administrative alteration of the ODen space cateqory Dercentage reauirements within the above categories may be made bY the parks director on a case-by-case basis. but in no case shall the combination of cateqories total less than 15% unless otherwise provided for in section 20. Review and aDproval of such cases shall be based on the following considerations: 1. The chanqe in Dercentaqe reQUirements would result in a superior ODen space Dlan than could be accomDlished under the standard Dercentaqe reauirements. 2. The availabilitv and tYDeS of open space located within the immediate area. 3. The presence on-site of environmental features that are unique rare or of local imDortance. 4. The oDportunities for the Dreservation of significant views and creation of Dublic access to Doints of interest. 5. The relationshiD of the proDosed open SDaces to the city's park Dlan. CHAPTER 22 Zoning Article XIII. supplementary District Regulations Division 1. Generally Sec. 22-955. calculating lot coverage. (a) General. Except as specified in subsection (b) of this section, the area of all structures, pavement and any other impervious surface on the subject property will be calculated as a percentage of total lot area. exclusive of the area of any recorded access easements. in determining compliance with maximum lot coverage required in this chapter. If the subject property contains more than one use, the maximum lot coverage requirements for the predominant use will apply to the entire development. 6 .. MEMO FROM: Land Use Committee Members Kathy McClung, Deputy CDS Director tJJ\ TO: DATE: November 24, 1997 Subdivision Code and Subdivision Signs RE: Attached is the revised ordinance with changes discussed at previous meetings. ~- , .~. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE FEDERAL WAY SUBDIVISION CODE, ADOPTING SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS AND ADDING NEW REGULATIONS FOR CLUSTER SUBDIVISIONS AND. AMENDING CHAPTER 22 OF THE FEDERAL WAY ZONING CODE ADDING NEW PROVISIONS FOR SUBDIVISION SIGNS. A. WHEREAS amendments to the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) text are authorized pursuant to FWCC Sections 22-216 and 22-217 pursuant to Process IV review; and B. WHEREAS the Federal Way City Council has considered proposed changes to the FWCC regarding specific subdivision regulations; and C. WHEREAS the Federal Way City Council, pursuant to FWCC 22-517, having determined the Proposal to be worthy of legislative consideration, referred the Proposal to the Federal Way Planning Commission. as a priority item for its review and recommendation; and D. WHEREAS the Federal Way Planning Commission, having considered the Proposal at public hearings during 1997 on June 4, June 18, and August 20 pursuant to FWCC Section 22-523, and all public notices having been duly given pursuant to FWCC Section 22-521; and E. WHEREAS the public was given opportunities to comment on the Proposal ORD# , PAGE 1 during the Planning Commission review; and F. WHEREAS the City of Federal Way SEPA responsible official has issued a Declaration of Nonsignificance on April 27, 1997; and G. WHEREAS following the public hearings, the Planning Commission submitted . to the land Use and Transportation Committee of the City Council its recommendation in favor of proposed subdivision code amendments adding sections to the FWCC as noted previously; and H. WHEREAS the Federal Way land Use and Transportation City Council Committee met on September 3rd and 15th, October 6th and 20th, November 3rd and 17th and December 1 st, 1997 to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission and has moved to forward the Proposal, with amendments, to the full City Council; and " I. WHEREAS there was sufficient opportunity for the public to comment on the Proposal; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: Section 1. Findinas. After full and careful consideration, the City Council of the City of Federal Way makes the following findings with respect to the Proposal and the proposed amendments to the Federal Way City Code ("FWCC"): 1. The Federal Way City Council adopted the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan in order to comply with the state's Growth Management Act; and ORD# , PAGE 2 " . . 2. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan contains policies that call for the amending of subdivision regulations to promote innovative and flexible standards in the design and development of new residential subdivisions; and 3. The Federal Way SEPA responsible official has issued a Declaration of Nonsignificance on April 27, 1997; and 4. The proposed code amendments would not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare; and 5. The Planning Commission, following notice thereof as required by RCW 35A.63.070, held public hearings on the proposed regulatory amendments and has considered the testimony, written comments, and material from the public by and through said hearings. Section 2. Conclusions. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-217 and based upon the Findings set forth in Section 1, the Federal Way City Council makes the following Conclusions of Law with respect to the decisional criteria necessary for the adoption of the Proposal: 1. The Proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies: LUP16 Revise existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single family developments and in-fill. LUP19 Consider special development techniques (e.g. accessory dwelling units, zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit ORD# , PAGE 3 developments) in single family areas provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. LUP20 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, watercourses, vistas, and similar feqtures) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, and lot size averaging. HP14 Amend development regulations to encourage superior design and a greater diversity of housing types and costs through such techniques as incentives, inclusionary zoning, planned unit developments, density bonuses, and transfer of development rights. HP15 Consider zero lot line standards within planned unit developments to create higher density single family neighborhoods with large open space areas. 2. The Proposal bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety and welfare because it implements policies aimed at increasing housing diversity and availability, neighborhood identity and promotes site sensitive development to protect the environment and neighborhood character. Section 3. Amendment The Federal Way Zoning Code, Chapter 20, is amended to provide as set forth in Attachment A which is attached and by this reference is incorporated herein. Section 4. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application ORD# , PAGE 4 -~ ..~-- to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from the time of its final passage, as provided by law. of PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this ,1995. day CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MAYOR, MAHLON S. PRIEST ATTEST: CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, LaNDI K. LINDELL FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: ORD# I PAGE 5 EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. ORD# ,PAGE 6 ATTACHMENT A Article 1:. 1:n General Sec. 20-1. Definitions Binding site plan shall mean a plan drawn to scale processed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and RCW SQ.l? Binding site plans are divisions of land for sale or ground lease for commercial er ~ industrial. manufactured home parks. and condominium uses. Article II Plats DIVISION 4. BINDING SITE PLANS* ---------- *Cross reference(s)--site plan review procedure, §22-36l et seg. state law reference(s)--Binding site plans, RCW 58.17.035. ---------- Sec. 20-61. Subdivisions requiring binding site plan. Division of any land for sale or lease which is classified for commercial, business, office, or industrial development, or which is to be developed as condominiums or manufactured home park shall be required to obtain an approved binding site plan in accordance with this and other ordinances of the city. Sec. 20-68. Alteration of bindinq site Dlan. Alteration of an approved binding site plan shall follow the same process and reauirements set forth in this division for the approval of a bindinq site plan. Sec. 20-108.5. Alteration and vacation of short Dlats. (a) Alteration of an approved short plat shall follow the same review process used to create a short plat as set forth in Sec. 20-81: EXCEPT that when an alteration involves a public dedication. the alteration shall be processed as provided in Division 9.. (b) Vacation of an approved short plat shall follow the process established as follows: EXCEPT that. when a vacation involves a public dedication. the vacation shall be processed as provided in Division 9. 1 " (1) A preapplication conference between the proponent and city staff to discuss the circumstances and reasons for the vacation as set forth in Sec. 20-82. (2) Review of the short subdivision vacation application to determine whether or not the application is complete and acceptable for filina. An application for vacation shall include the followina: (a) An application for approval of a short subdivision vacation shall be made to the department of community development services upon forms furnished bv the city. Applications shall be made bv the owner or owners of the parcel or parcels of all property encompassed bv the application or bv a duly authorized aaent. The owner or owners of all parcels to be included must ioin in or be represented in the application. (b) The application shall include seven prints of the approved short subdivision and accompanied bv statement settina forth the reasons for vacation. Approval. approval with conditions. or denial of the short subdivision vacation bv the director of the department of community development services. Filina of the short subdivision vacation in the office of the county division of records and elections. (3) (4) Division 6. preliminary Plat Sec. 20-110. Content and form of' application (8) Preliminary plat certificate not less from a licensed title insurance company. , iil Additional information as required at the discretion of the director of community development services. than 90 days old Division 9. Vacation of Subdivisions Sec. 20-250. Plat vacation aDDlication. When any person is interested in the vacation of any subdivision that person shall submit an application to reauest the vacation to the city. (a) Signatories. The application shall contain the sianatures of the maioritv of those persons havina an ownershi~ interest of lots. tracts. parcels. sites or division in the subiect subdivision or a portion to be vacated. If the subdivision is subject to restrictive covenants which were filed at the time of approval of the subdivision. and the application 2 -~-~~ , " for alteration would result in the violation of a covenant. the application shall contain an aareement sianed bv all parties subiect to the covenants provldina that the parties aaree to terminate or alter the relevant covenants to accomplish the purpose of the vacation of the subdivision or portion thereof. (b) Completed application defined. A completed application shall be as required for preliminarv plats. pursuant to FWCC Section 20-107. Sec. 20-251. Acceotance of aoolication. routing. (a) Upon submittal of a completed application for vacation of plat. the department of communitv development services shall transmit at least one copv of the application for vacation for review and recommendation to each of the followina: (1) Public works department: (2) Lakehaven utility District and/or City of Tacoma Public utilitv Department and/or other utilitv district. as appropriate: (3) Federal Wav Fire Department: (4) county department of public health. if septic svstems are proposed for sewaae disposal: Federal Wav School District #210: and (5) (6) Buildina division: (7) Other individuals or iurisdictions as deemed appropriate bv the director. (b) An application for plat vacation shall not be accepted for filing for the pur~ose of official processina until: (1) The director of communitv development services determines that the ap~licant has paid all fees and submitted all documents and information as required herein to permit a full public hearina on the merits of the application: and Sec. 20-252. Process for review and notice of public hearing. (a) Upon confirmation bv the director of communitv development services that the plat vacation application is complete the application shall be processed and reviewed followina the procedures defined in Section 20-109 et sea. (b) Notice of the hearina shall be mailed to the appropriate citv or countv officials if their proposed plat vacation lies within one mile of the adioinina city or county boundarv. and to all 3 agencies or private companies pursuant to section 20-251(a) herein. (c) All notices reauired in this section shall clearly describe in layPerson's terms the nature of the reauest. the location of the proposal. the date. time and location of the hearina. and address and telephone number where additional informatiop may be obtained relative to the application. Sec. 20-253. Reþort to hearina examiner: review. (a) No less than seven days prior to the date of the public hearina. the department of community development services shall submit to the hearina examiner a written report summarizina the application for plat vacation. The report shall contain. in addition to the reauirements in section 20-111. et sea.. the followina information: (1) All communications from other agencies or individuals relatina to the application which were received in time to be included in the report to the hearing examiner. A list of recommendations from the de~artment of community development services. department of public works. and other appropriate departments relatina to plat vacati~n approval. (2) (b) The hearina examiner shall review the application in accordance with the procedures stipulated in Article VII. Process IV Review. Sec. 20-254. city council review. action. city council review of hearing examiner recommendations on applications for plat alterations shall be limited to the record of the hearina examiner. oral comments received at the public meeting (so lona as such comments do not raise new issues or information not contained in the examiner's record) and the hearina examiner's report. ARTICLE III. DESIGN CRITERIA* Sec. 20-153. Density. (b) Lots created in under Section 20-154 may be below minimum lot size requirements of chapter 22, provided the total number of lots created does not exceed the number which would be permitted in a conventional subdivision on a site of the same total area, after reservation of required open space. The total number of lots permitted will be calculated bY subtractina the required open space (15%) and subtractina 20% for streets from the aross land available. then dividina bY the minimum lot size of the underlyina zoina district. Sec 20-154. Cluster subdivision. (a) In order to promote open space and the protection of natural " 4 ...--- ...' 1 fatures such as trees, wetlands, and other environmental Iv sensitive areas. lots may be reduced in size and placed in clusters on the site. The qross land area available for cluster subdivisions must be a minimum of two acres. (b) Lots created in a cluster subdiviisionmay be reduced in size bbelow the minimum required in chaspter 22, UP to'l/2 of the size of the underlyinq zoninq reQUirement but in no case smaller than 3600 square feet. per lot.provided that minimum yard ðftà setback requirements are met except as allowed for in (d) below.Builàin~ oetback linea for each let shall be aho\ffl on the face of a cluoter aubdivioion plat. (c) Open space created by cluster subdivisions shall be protected from surhter subdivision or development by covenants filed and recorded with the final plat ot the subdivision. (d) Cluster subidivisons can be constructed with zero-lot lines. provided that no more than two units may share a common wall. (e) Any subdivision created by this section must provide all open space on-site and it must all be usable. Sec. 20-155. Open Space and recreation. (b) All residential subdivisions shall be required to provide open space in the amount of 15 percent of the gross land area of the subdivision site, or if the oite io five acreo or leaD in . aize, applicanta may acc]c alternati...e methoda of providing the required open apace aa permitted by aection 19 41 et aeq., if acceptable to the city; Except for subdivisions created under section 20-154. a fee-in-lieu payment may be made to satisfY open space requirements at the discretion of the parks director after consideration of the city's overall park plan. QUality. location. and service area of the open space that would otherwise be provided within the proiect. The fee-in-lieu of open space shall be calculated on fifteen percent (15%) of the most recent assessed value of the property. In the absence of an assessment. the market value shall be based on an appraisal conducted bY a MAI certified appraiser or another professional appraiser approved by the parks director. And except for lots within an existinq subdivision. where open space was alreadY dedicated or a fee in lieu paid. the percent of open space required will be the difference between the open space dedicated prior and 15% (c) Any combination of accomplish the total area Open Space Category Usable Conservation open space types may be required to be reserved % of Grqss Land Area 10% minimum No maximum or minimum used to as follows: 5 .....- Buffer Constrained 2% maximum 2% maximum An administrative alteration of the open space cateaorv percentaae reauirements within the above cateaories may be made bv the Darks director on a case-by-case basis. but in no case shall toe combination of cateaories total less than 15% unle3ss otherwise Drovided for in section 20. Review and approval of such cases shall be based on the followina considerations: 1. The chanae in percentaae reauirements would result in a superior open space plan than could be accomplished under the standard ~ercentaae reauirements. 2. The availability and tVDes of open space located within the immediate area. 3. The presence on-site of environmental features that are uniaue or rare or of local importance. 4. The opportunities for the preservation of sianificant views and creation of public access to points of interest. 5. The relationship of the proposed open spaces to the city's park plan. CHAPTER 2 2 Zoning Article XIII. Supplementary District Regulations Division 1. Generally Sec. 22-955. calculating lot coverage. (a) General. Except as specified in subsection (b) of this section, the area of all structures, pavement and any other impervious surface on the subject property will be calculated as a percentage of total lot area. exclusive of the area of any recorded access easements. in determining compliance with maximum lot coverage required in this chapter. If the subject property contains more than one use, the maximum lot coverage requirements for the predominant use will apply to the entire development. 6 -~-- .. , oj Changes to Section 22-335 Nonconforming signs. (e) Amortization. All legal nonconforming signs except subdivision siqns installed prior to February 28. 1990 (see Section 22-335 ;) shall be discontinued and removed or made conforming within ten years from the effective date of this code, on or before February 28,2000, and all signs which are made nonconforming by a subsequent amendment to this code sh~ll be discontinued and removed or made conforming within five years after the date of such amendment (collectively the "amortization period"). Upon the expiration of the amortization period, the sign shall be brought into conformance with this code, with a permit obtained, or be removed. A sign prohibited pursuant to section 22-1600 may not be brought into conformance and must therefore be immediately removed upon the expiration of the amortization period. (j) Subdivision signs. All leqal. nonconforminq subdivision siqns constructed prior to February 28.1990 shall be exempt from the amortization requirement unless they are removed. rebuilt. or altered beyond customary and routine maintenance. or are determined to be within the siqht distance trianqle or are in public riqht of way and interfere with construction. maintenance or other ~ublic improvements. in which case the siqn must be replaced with a siqn that meets the requirements of section 22- 1600. .. , Memo FROM: Land Use Committee Kathy Mcclung, Deputy CDS Director ~ TO: DATE: November 25, 1997 RE: Carryover work program Attached is the schedule for the code amendments and annexations from the 1997 work program into 1998. At a future meeting we will provide information regarding other code amendments we will be required to make in 1998 due to changes to state law as well as other proposed changes the staff and Planning commission have suggested. . 11125/97' I ~J, ( Projected Timelines for Code \ Amendments & Annexations n,!""" 'lW""'~'~¡<-~' ,. , ,,' ,'...:.- ' " '\."', ",' :t" ". ,,' ", <.. ' . "'"',:'DÏ'àfr :':', '?\'SEPA! 'P"l" "'~"':>:'~"", f ':'R,:.i~ ",',' ~\Cò<:",X¡;' '" ' It" .,' , m .' ,',~, cpo -',r:,_,:, ~'j1,,¡mR e ',", '""..,.,.'d""'«",<"",,," 1724 Complete Complete Complete Complete' Complete Downtown Parking Complete N/A Complete Complete Complete Essential Public Facilities Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Non- Conforming Complete 5/15 Complete Complete 12/2 Subdivision Complete 5/30 Complete 12/1 12/16, 1/6 Tele- communications 5/23 7/16 Complete Complete Complete Sensitive Areas Complete 6/11 October January February Affordable 11/18 Housing July September October November & 12/2 Shoreline November December Feb/Mar March April Comprehensive Plan Update December January January February March Residential Design January February April May June Wellhead Protection January February May May June Enchanted Annexation November November - DecemÞer December December ',.'~- We have been notified that the Weyerhaeuser Annexation will6écome active again shortly. Applewood Annexation will be incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan Update. Regional Governance is dependent on Suburban Cities Association Committee work. 1:IDOCUMÐmCODEADMN,CHT ~ ~ 16:30 t'.U¿ McConnell/Burke, Incorporated " Planning and Hearing Examiner Sezv1œs 10604 N.E. 38th Place S\úte 227 K1rkland, Washington 98033 (206) 827-6550 FAX; 889-0730 MEMORANDUM October 28. 1991 To: Federal Way Land Use & Transportation Committee From: Don Largen, Planning Consultant Subject: Proposed Subdivision Regulation Amendments --___MMM~___---_M-__MM___- -------- .M- .M- - - - .---... -- -- ... .., "" .. .- -- --- - -- -- "- -- M-M""" At the October 2O. 1991 meeting the Committee raised several questions and issues regarding the proposed subdivision code amendments. Below are the items the ComnJittee requested that staff address foe the next meeting. 1. The cost of a short plat versus a long plat is as follows: Short Plat = $1,333 ? ~ ~ Long Plat = $3.412 !:> The difference in cost is $2,079. All other associated fees are about the same between the two permits, 2. A copy of the County-Wide Planning Policies for King County relative to affordable housing is attached to this mcmo. 3. The following change is made to clarify that resubdivided parcels must meet the 15% opcn space requirement if the previous division o1'iginaUy required less, ARTICLE III. DESIGN CRITERIA. (b) All residential subdivisions shall be required to provida open space in the amount of 15 percen~ of the gro~s land area of the subdivision site. sr ~f ,he site is five aerea er less ~R aiae. applicants may see~ alterna~~ve metflsåa of P~ov4QiRg ~ftS re~ir£ã apeR space as permi~~~~ 9cceisn. :J:9-U el¡ seE!.. if aeeep~b-le eEl eke city; EXC1::l"r in those cases where a previous division of land met a 1Qsser £I:P~.Il. s ace re uirement. the rasubdivided arcel~ need on1 provide open space to t: -~ amount necessary t9..!,ect the 15\ minimum. 4, The Committee requested changes in the bonus program for PRDs. Below we have eliminated the zero lot line and clustered units bonuses and reallocated the eredÍls lo affordable housing units and housing diversity. 10/28/97 11m 16:34 I [TX/RX NO 6320] OCT-28-97 rUE 16:31 ~èö' - ~ '? !!~ v ...., :;:¡ t1 ..,- .!:! :... 0 The 40% density incrgase is reached by utilizing ~he following density bonus design factors: Design Factor Mix of housing types Modulated building facades Variation in Roof Lines Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail If it connects to off-site Public access to: vista or viewpoint Lake or stream Retention of native vegetation Utilization of natural drainage Enhanced or increased sensitive Affordable housing units Bonus Densiey % 13 4 3 3 trail system 4 area buffers 3 3 5 4 3 15 5. Language in proposed Section 20-312(c) would allow a fee-in-lieu payment Lo be made for open space at the discretion of the Parks Djrector under certain criteria. The concern expressed by the Committee was that these monies should be used to provide parks and open space in the same general vicinity in which the subdivision making the paymenr is loCéll~d. This raises the question of how to define the boundary of (his 'general vicinity' without being arbitrary. There appear to be Lhree reasonable choices the City could use: (a) The City establishes eight Park Planning Areas wirhin the Park Comprehensive Plan. Five are located west of 1-5 and the other three on the east sidc. Using these Park Planning Areas has the advantage of lying fee-in-lieu payments to established boundaries that are specific to the provision of park and open space resources. The disadvnntugc may be that these Park Planning Areas are larger than what the Committee had in mine!. (b) The service area boundaries for the elementary schools might also be used. There arc 21 elementary schools in the City, which means Lhese boundaries would cncolllpa.<;s smaller areas than the Park Planning Areas. The advantage to using school service ar~¡L~ is Ih,lt ùley generally correspond to a neighborhood scale and are recognized for other funding purposes. The disadvantage may be that the service areas may be small cnough thm in some cases there may be no sites suitable for the use of the fee-in-licu payment funds. (c) The other option would be to use the National Parks and Recreation AssocÍé1tion (NPRA) standards for park service areas. The NPRA standard for Neighborhood Parks is a service area with a ~ mile rùdius and would be the one most corresponding to \\ neighborhood sized area. The disadvantages to this would be that there are no identified boundaries, making monitoring and implementing of where the fce-in-lieu payments are to be used difficult for City staff. and that Lhe specific area within the ~ mile radius m,lY not conlain sites suitable for parks or open space. 6. The Committee suggested that Sh0l1 plats of 4 lots or less be re~ujred to make a fee-ill-lieu payment for open space rather than having an on-site open space rcquircrnenl. Legal starr has r~searçhcd (his issue and the RCW is ççur that a fce-in-licu paymcnr must be used in conjunction with the option of providing oll-site dedication of open space. The underlying 10/28/97 TUE 16:34 [TX/RX NO 6320] Ii V 'i ",. ~ ~ ,i 16: 31 P,O4 issue was whether or not we would get any quality on-site open spaces wilhin short plulS of 4 or less lots. The Commiltee's position wag that all subdivisions regardless of size should contribute in some manner to providing open space resources. Leaving the current open space requirements for short plats in place and allowing for a fcc-in-lieu payment could address both issues. 7. The Committee also suggested three different levels of review and approval for different sized plats, This was in response to the recommendation to rclise the number ot" lots qualifying for Ii short plat from 4 to 9, The concern raised was that the public would nul havc input to the process for plats of 5 to 9 lots, since the short plat process is administrative. The Committee suggested a public hearing requirement for plats of 5 to 9 lot,;. but not require a final plat approval. This can be done, but it still requires rclising the number of lots rTO\TI 4 to 9. The RCW requires a final plat approval process for long plats; the City does not have the option of waiving this requirement. To eliminate this requirement for plulO; of 5 to 9 loL'\ they must be eligible for the short plat process. We can add language that would estabHsh the public hearing requirement for plats of 5 to 9 lots within the short plat regulations. This raises the issue of who conducts the hearing and who would hear an appeal"! At present 10ng plats are approved based on a hearing examiner recommendation .md city council decsiol1. Appeals of the council decsion arc made to ~;uperior courl. Assuming the city council wi11 conduct the pub1ic hearing, then the appeals could be handled two ways: appeal to superior COUlt. or appeal to hearing examiner and then to court. 8. The Committee heard testimony regarding allowing the use of the proposed PRD regulations in the SE zoning districts. Staff and I have discussed this and we agree that there may be situations where (he use of a PRD in the SE lone makes sense. This would be parlicul;.u'ly true in situations where a parcel is largely constrained by sensitive areas. Our recommendation at this point would be to include the use of PRDs in the SE zoning dislricts. 9. Finally, a letter submitted to the City by Mr. Scholes raises a good point. As proposed we would be allowing a fee-in-lieu payment for open space for a standard subdivision. but would not for a PRD. The effect could be to make the PRD option less attractive and undennine the incentive to use the PRO option. " 10/28/97 TUE 16:34 (TX/RX NO 6320) ~ .' CC-10 CC-11 CC-12 Th ceptual map of open space systems contained in the 1988 King Co Open Space Plan shall be u the planning basis for regional open space lands and dors. All jurisdictions will work coope . I to revise and supplement this map to dil' e protection of these valua( resources throughout ounty. All jurisdictions shall use un range of regulatory a nd preservation tools available to cre- ate, maintain and rd the regional open space system has been cooperatively identi- fied. VI. urisdictions shall develop. coordinated leveJ-of-service standards for the p open spaces. Affordable Housing Adequate housing. for all economic segments of the population. is ó basic need of King County ~ residents and an issue of Countywide concern. Affordable housing needs must be addressed by local governments working in cooperation with the private sector and nonprofit housing agencies. . The Growth Management Act requires Countywide Policie-c: to address parameters for the distribution of affordable housing. including housing for .all income groups. This complex issues require-c: adequate information regarding cur- rent housing resources and housing needs., which is being developed for comprehensive plan housing elements. as well (IS in-depth discussiO~ of values and priorities for housing development ( , Providing sufficient land for housing development is an essential step in promoting affordable housing. Affordable housing can be enCOUl'aged by zoning additional land for higher residential densities. which helps provide needed' capacity for growth. reduces land development cost per unit, and allows for lower cost construction types such. as attached dwellings. Higher density housing includes a range of housing types: small-lot single family. attached single family, mobile home parks. apartments and condominiums. in addition, zoning changes that permit additional housing in established areas, such as accessory units. carriage houses, and residences built above commercial uses, increase .affordable housing opportunities. FW-28 AH-1 ! J All jurisdictions shall provide for a diversity of housing types to meet a variety of needs and provide for housing opportunities for all economic segments of the population. All jurisdictions shall cooperatively establish a process to ensure an equitable and rational distribution of low- income and affordable housing throughout the COunty in accordance with land use policies, trans- portation, and employment locations. All jurisdictions' shall plan for housing to meet the needs of all economic segments of the popula- tion. Each jurisdiction shall specify, based on the projected number of net new housing units anticipated in its comprehensive plan, the estimated number of units which will be affordable for the following income segments: Zero to 50 percent of the Countywide median household income, . 50 to 80 percent of median, 80 to 120 percent of median, and above 120 percent median. The estimates for housing affordable to households below 80 percent of median-income shall be con- sistent with Countywide objectives før low and 11'oderate income housing in policy AH-2.. The es- timated number of units for each income segment shall be reported to the Growth .Management Planning Council following adoption of the comprehensive plan, for the purpose of Countywide monitoring of capacity for housing development. . , , Within the Urban Growth Area, each jurisdiction shall demonstrate its ability to accommodate st " ficient, affordable housing for all economic segments of the population. Local actions may inetude 36 ~ I Ii . (" ( I' " 3. ....... AH-2 ç: ~~ iï~ ~t ./1;:j «II!! sey t zoning land for development of sufficient densities, revising development standards and pel, ¡fJ procedures as needed to encourage affordable housing, reviewing codes for redundancies an, inconsistencies, and providing opportunities for a range of housing types, such as accessory dwelling units, manufactured homes, group homes and foster care facilities, apartments, townhouses and attached single family housing. All jurisdictions shall share the responsibility for achieving a rational and equitable distribution of affordabl~ housing to meet the housing needs of low and moderate-income residents in King -county. The distribution of housing affordable to low and moderate-income households shall take into consideration the need for proximity to lower wage employment, access to transportation and human serviçes, and the adequacy of infrastructure to support housing development; recognize each jurisdiction's past and current efforts to provide housing affordable to low and moderate- income households: avoid over-concentration of assisted housing; and increase housing oppor- tunities and choices for low and moderate-income households in communities throughout King County. Each jurisdiction shall give equal consideration to local and Countywide housing needs. A. Existing Needs for Affordable Housing Each jurisdiction shall participate in developing Countywide housing resources and programs to assist the large number of low and moderate-income households who currentJy do not have affordable, appropriate housing. These Countywide efforts will help reverse current trends which concentrate low-income housing opportunities in certain communities, and achieve a more equitable participation by local jurisdictions in low income housing development and services. COuntywide efforts should give priority to assisting households below 50 percent of median-income that are in greatest need and communities with high proportions of low and moderate income residents. By October, 1994, the Growth Management Planning COuncilor-its successor shall appoint elected. and cor"'- munity representatives to develop recommendations for providing low and moderate-income housing and. related services. Within one year the committee shall recommend to the Growth Management Planning COuncilorässu~~ . New COuntywide funding source(s) for housing production and selVices, and a plan to establish this funding within three years; ~articipation by local governments, including appropriate public and private financing, such that each jurisdiction contributes on fair share basis; and Objectives for housing and related services, including measurable levels of housing production and costs to provide necessary related selVice. . COuntywide programs should provide the following types of housing and related services: 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. Low-income housing development, including new construction, acquisition, and rehabilitation; Housing assistance, such as rental vouchers and supportive services; Assistance to expand the capacity of nonprofit organizations to develop housing and provide housing related services; - Programs to assist homeless individuals and. families; Programs to prevent homelessness; and Assistance to low and moderate-income home buyers. 4. 5. 6. B. Future Needs for AffordabJe Housing Each jurisdiction shall specify the range and amount of housing affordable to low and moderate-income households to be accommodated in its comprehensive plan. Each jurisdiction shall plan for a number of housing unäs affordable to households with incomes between 50 and 80 percent of the County median household income that is equal to 17 percent of äs projected net household growth. In addition, each juri . diction shall plan for a number of housing units affordable to households with incomes below 50 percent OT .' median income that is either 20 percent or 24 percent of its projected net household growth. For this housing, 37 ~- \11. ~ 'II>. '" '" "" ~ 'II>.~~~ ~~~\ ~~~~ ~'6~~ ~~%<1 IS\ \II. \II ~ ,.,' ?2. II>. ~ i' 1 ~, <?> q... - the target percentage shall be detennined using the Affordable Housing Job/Housing Index developed using Census-based information, which is contained in Appendix 3. C. Each jurisdiction shall show in its comprehensive plan how it will use policies. incentives. regulations and programs to provide its share of housing affordable to low and moderate-income households, Each jurisdic.- tion should apply strategies which it determines to be most appropriate to the local housing market, For example, units affordable to low and moderate income households may be developed through new construction, projects that assure long-term affordability of existing ho~ng, oraccessory housing units added to existing structures. loCal actions may include: a. Identifying the costs to develop and preserve subsidized houSing and other low-cost housing not provided by private development in the local housing market, and identifying sources of funding; b. Revising land use regulations as needed to remove any unreasonable requirements that may create barriers to siting and operating housing for speåal needs groups. Special needs housing . serves persons, who,' by virtue of disability or other circumstances. face d~fficulty Jiving inde- pendently and require supportive services on a transitional or long-term b8sis: and . c. Adopting land use incentives programs or other regulatory measures to encourage private and nonprofit development Small, fully built cities and towns that are not planned to grow substantially under Growth Management Act may worK cooperatively with other jurisdictions and/or subregional housing agencies to meet their housing targets. In areas identified as city expansion areas, King County and cities should plan cooperatively for affordable housing development and preservation. AH-3 AH-4 AH-5 Each jurisdiction shall evaluate its existing resources of subsidized and low-cost non-subsidized housing and identify housing that may be lost due to redevelopment. deteriorating housing condi- tions, or public policies or actions. Where feasible, each jurisdiction shall develop strategies to p~erve existing low-income housing and provide relocation assistance to low-income residents ( who ,may be displaced. . The Growth Management Planning Councilor its successor shall identify ways to expand techn,ical assistance to local jurisdictions in affordable housing techniques. Technical assistance should include project case studies and model ordinances covering such topics as development and financing of nonprofit housing, provision of housing-related services, incentives programs for affordable housing, regulations that encourage welJ-designed higher density housing, improvements to development permit processing and standards to reduce development costs, and public education and involvement. The Affordable Housing Task Force Report, dated March 1994 contains a summary of actions that local govemments may use to encourage affordable housing. All jurisdictions shall monitor residential development within their jurisdiction and determine annually the total number of new and redeveloped units receiving permits and units constructed, housing types, developed densities and remaining capacity for residential growth. Housing prices and rents also should be reported, based on affordability to four income categories: Zero to 50 percent of median income, 50 to 80 percent of median, 80 to 120 percent of median, and above' 120 percent of median. King County shall report annually Qn housing development. the rate of housing cost and price increases and available residential capacity Countywide in its annual growth reporting. . The Affordable Housing and Data Technical Forums, which are comprised of city and County staff and private housing industry representatives, shall develop a unifonn approach for monitoring housing permit activity. construction. and affordability. Where feasible, the Affordable Housing and Data Technical Forums shall consider collc~cting statistics such as: housing units receiving building permits by income category, total units constructed by income category, low and moder- ~te-income housing acquired or preserved, households receiving rental assistance, and other local housing activities. In addition where feasible, planning and monitoring'for affordable housing I should use the median household income for King County indexed by household size, published' annu~lIy by the U.S. Department"of Housing and Urban Development. Calculations of affordable 38 ( AH-6 ( ~ !?-~ .Ii. ~ ~-'lh P-1 .. :fJ ~, ~ .: Ii. house prices should assume standard Federal Housing Administration lending cñtelia aoc1 ~\. "', ., § mum down payments. IJ . Every five years. beginning in 1999, the Growth Management Planning Councilor its successOr organization responsible for monitoring growth management implementation shall evaluate achievement of Countywide and local goals for housing for all economic segments of the popula- tion. The Growth Management Planning Councilor its successor shall consider annual reports prepared under policy AH-5 as well as market. conditions and other factors affecting housing development. If the Growth Management Planning Councilor its successor determines that housing planned for any economic segment falls short of the need for such housing, the Growth Management Planning Councilor its successor may recommend additional actions. As part of its evaluation, the Growth Management Planning Councilor its success.or shall review local performance in meeting low and moder:ate income housing needs. The basis for determining local performance shaff be a jurisdiction's participation in Countywide or subregional efforts to . address existing housing needs and actual development of the target percentage of low and mod- erate.income housing units as adopted in its comprehensive plan. In establishing planning targets to address future affordable housing needs, it is recognized that success will be dependent in part upon regional factors beyond the control of any single jurisdiction. Anyone jurisdiction acting alone, or even in concert with other local govemments. mayor may not be able to achieve its tar- gets in these policies, despite its best efforts. Success will require cooperation and support for affordable housing from the state, federal and local governments, as well as the private sector. The significant role of the market must also be recognized. In determining performance the . Growth Management Planning Councilor its successor shall therefore use reasonable judgment, and also shall consider these market and other factors, as well as action taken to encourage development and preservation of low and moderate-income housing, such as local funding, devel- opment code changes, and creation of new programs. VII. tiguous and Orderiy Development and Pro . Ion of Urba ervices to Such Development Chapter 11, "lAnd Use Palt .. contains policies for phasing development with. e Urban Growth Area. An integral component of the phasing process ensuring that development is accomp 0 by afull range of urban services. Equally important is ensuring that in cture improvements are not oded in advance of development which could undermine the Countywide develo ttun. This chØP. provides policies which support phasing within the Urban Growth Area and ensure the integrity 0 Countywi and development pattern. . FW-29 FW-30 FW-31 Jurisdictions shall ide' e services needed to act1 constructing need rvices shalf be identified. Protection 0 blic health and safety and the environment shall iven high priority in decision- making ut infrastructure improvements. County residents in both an and Rural Areas shall hav asonable access to a higtrquality drinking water sourœ meeting a ederal and State . king water requirements. Management and operation of existing on-site . c systems shall not result in adverse impacts to public.health or the environment. . General Policies To ensure that land use is accompanied with the maximum possible use of existing facilities and cost-effective service provisions and extensions. and to encourage development of strong. interrelated communities. policies are needed which integrate a full range of urban services with land-use planning and elfVironmental protection. Urban service 39 'b \b - /1.\' ~ ' 16:35 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,\~~ ~~ 144: 6 ~~~ O<L ~ ~~ <;!., ~- ,~,~ r ' ~. ifß no JobsIHqusÏD81ndex. wu developed by the AffonlüJe HOÞSÍQ,J TeehDlc:aI Forum as . WIly 10 adj&&st ho\31n,c ~. <:.."" wpu bue4 on each JllrildiotiOGl alltiDS concentrations of Jow..cost bouslD¡ and tow.wale empJc)'mont. A ~ Low-Wage ~obs Index grcatcrtba one It.d;e.t'~ that!bt ,raportiOft of tower WIp erop1D)aCftt is ~!t!!r!hut the coU1lt)' a~cj I ~w-cøs& Housln¡1ndß pcucr,1hID one indicates thaz lb. proportion of lower cost housing is Jw than thå county avenge. 11Ie JobLIHOlllÙlI JDda is exmpa1ed by JIIuJdplying the job¡ IUd bOU$ln¡ Indexes. IgRether, ~ . ' PoHcy AH-~ establishes plannm¡ tIrptS for hoU5ing Iffordabl~ to bouehoJds with incomes between 0 an~ SO porcerrroTtije county me4ian Jnoom6. Eiascd on 1M Jo.bsfHouiin¡ lDda.j\IÒ5dic:tions sliould' p1an.'før a ÞÞmbcr of units that is Dither 20 or 24 percent of projected net new bousinl untø,as follows: ' JobåIHolIsiDg I"~ poater than O'le: 24 pcr;ca1. JoIú/Housin¡ Index leulbao one: 20 pen:ent. Jurildlcåoft for which lDd8x could nat be ggmputed s own 85 NA : 20 1'"1'11,.._. \ . o~ ~ þ.s ,as 'iOl.Unt' "~i/,foüj¡f{-6. <1ó ill ~1l~ S So ~ ;3 ~ r -:;- p;u~ ¡ A tf'ENP\)( 3 : Ai'FO}U)ADLE HOUSING JOBSf}lOUSING INDEX : ;.:,¡;:~~¡¡ . .' -..... ., r.r 73 0.85 4Oe 0.61 0.52 Algpne.... '..¡cI..~;, ut)Utn "~.¡!f'.\"" 5.362 o.B3 9,245 0.65 0.54 , -,.~'t.' ~ BtUfwc Arts " '. ::~., ~ NA NA 3 20.74 NA BotJOVU8 ,. .~.. 22.297, 1.08 12.801 1,39 1.50 Black Diamond":i+ 59 1.28 259 0.73 0.93 Bethell . .,;~ 1,691 1.19 1.704 1.2 1.43 Car!natíon . &4 0.85 248 0.81 0.69 Clyte HiU .. 31 0.52 21 .26.07 13.58 De Moines 1.564 1.27 4,473 0.74 0.94 Du~1I S8 0.87 229 1.74 1.51 I Enumclsw 1,174 1.17 2,106 D.SS 0.78 F8Cferal W~y 6.384 1.26 14.107 . O.8Ø 1.12 Hunts Point' 0 O' ., 14.14 NA , , Issaquah 1.676 . 1.17 ' 1,594 1.01 1.18 Kent 8.067 0.78 11.526 0.69 0.64 Kir~land ' $,472 1.17 6,955 1.17 1.31 La~e Forest Pk. -554 1.28 251 2.98 3.81 Medina 2S 0.91 54 10.87 9.71 Msicer Island 1.697 1.11 1.'rL1 3-21 3.!56 Milton NA NA 77 1.08 NA No~mandy p~ 352 1.%3 488 2.æ 3.30 No(th Bend 506 1.15 695 0.84 0.97 Pacific 147 O.BS 1.107 0-67 0.67 Redmond 7,296 0.96 5.103 1.34 1.29 Re1ton 9,675 0.77 ",999 0.75 O.SS SeaTac 4.497 0.91 6.528 a.Em 0.63 Seattle 129,451 ".02 134.526 0.87 '0.89 Sk~kcm ish NA NA 72. 0.63 NA Sr1Qqualmie 444 - 1.18 426 0.74 .0.87 Tu~ila 10.875 D.BS 4,2iS 0.65 0.5$ , Yarrow Point 0 17 11.2 ' NA Citijas . 219.489 1.00 232.410 0.91 0.91 Unlhc. KC: 32.885 1.03 66.775 '.32 1.36 . . KC !TOTAl 252.374 1.00 299.185 1.00 1.00 10/28/97 TUE 16:34 [TX/RX NO 6320] ScNrcc: Kine CoUtu)' PI8ØÙ"~ md Conmlllll'lY ~t DMsiOfl. 1993. ~ Notes t. 1. LÒw-yta.¡e jobs a~ cstilnatcd using J'uga Sound RcaiOU8l Council employment data for fiyo aoC\ çoby~d \0 lo~r income qWUtilc hO\llOhalds, Kine CoW1t)' PlaMin¡ and CommWlIty Develop~ 2. Propqrtion oflow-w..jobs relative 10 the COUftty ."8J8Ie. 3. R.e1\tt.1 hou,in¡ untes with Nats lib than S7oo per month. plus owaocl bwsin. WIlts valued at lcds ~ $100,000. in 1990 dollin. 1990 CcGsIolS. 4. Pr~pd,nion of low.ço:it ho;¡ing nlatjve 10 the ;ounty average. 5. Low.?t~Be jobs index (2) multiplied by the low-c:ost housing irutex (4). ¡§ 10/28/97 TUE 16:34 [TX/RX NO 6320] MEMO FROM: Land Use and Transportation Committee Kathy McClung, Deputy CDS Director ~ TO: DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1997 REi Subdivision Code/PRD ordinance/Subdivision signs Attached is the Planning Commission recommendation for changes to the Subdivision Code. Included in the recommendation are Planned Residential Development regulations which allow development to increase density when certain amenities are added to the development. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on June 4 and 18th and August 20th. Don Largen, consultant from McConnell Burke will present the subdivision code changes and PRD ordinance to the Committee. Also attached is an analysis and code language recommendations for subdivision signs. I will be making that part of the presentation to you. If I can provide additional information or if you have questions prior to the meeting, please let me know. Attachments: 1. Planning commission Findings 2. Draft Ordinance 3. Staff Report 4. Subdivision Sign analysis CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Planning commission .' DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 9, 1997 CITY COUNCIL ROBERT VAUGHAN, CHAIR PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGULATION UPDATES - SUBDIVISION ----------------------------------------------------------------- I. BACKGROUND The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan contains goals and policies that encourage innovative residential development to address issues such as neighborhood character, housing diversity, and appropriate in-fill development. Techniques including planned residential developments, zero lot lines, smaller lots, density bonuses, incentives, clustering, and others are suggested for consideration. Currently, the City's subdivision regulations provide little in the way of flexibility in site development and design. For example, while there are existing provisions to allow clustering of units within subdivisions, there are virtually no incentives to do so. City staff has identified several provisions within the subdivision regulations for review and possible amendments. The intent is to further the City's goal of accommodating growth through in-fill development. II. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCESS The Planning Commission held public hearings on June 4, June 18, and August 20, 1997. The City's consultant and City staff provided the Commission with an overview of issues and draft regulatory provisions. The hearings were attended by several members of the public, one of which is a local developer. Written testimony was provided by two of the attendees. The hearings were devoted to a section-by-section review of the recommended regulatory language contained in the June 4, 1997 consultant staff report. The City's consultant and City staff have prepared draft subdivision regulation amendments and a draft planned residential development ordinance, the provisions of which are to be included 1 in Chapter 20, this document. Subdivisions Code. The drafts are attached to I I I. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS The following list summarize the major code amendments reviewed by the Commission during this code revision process. Subdivisions (Long Plats) a. The number of lots requiring a long plat process is raised from 5 to 10. A new Division 9 is added to Article II to provide a process for the vacation of approved long plats. A preliminary plat certificate will be required with the submitted application. Short Subdivisions (Short Plat) a. The number of lots qualifying for a short plat (i.e. administrative review) is raised from 4 9. 1. b. c. 2. b. 3. 4. ~~~.._--~_..'". ..- .... . process lots to provisions are added to allow for the alteration and/or vacation of an approved short plat. A party owning or having interests in adjoining short plats shall utilize the long plat review process. Binding Site Plans a. Condominiums, manufactured home parks, and recreational vehicle parks are required to use the binding site plan process. Condominiums having an approved binding site plan are exempted from the general subdivision (long plat) process requirements. A new section is added to allow for the alteration of approved binding site plans. Open Space Requirements A fee-in-lieu payment is allowed at the discretion of the Parks Director instead of providing on-site open space. Open space requirements for short subdivisions of 4 lots or less are eliminated. Open space requirements do not apply to resubdi vided parcels if they met the open space requirements at the time of the original plat. c. b. c. a. b. c. 2 5. The Parks Director may alter the open space percentage requirements on a case-by-case basis under certain criteria. Planned Residential Developments (PRD) A new section is added to Chapter 20 to provide for the use of Planned Residential Developments in creating new residential subdivisions. The pertinent provisions are as follows: d. a. Minimum tract size for a PRD is 2 acres. A maximum density increase of 40% is allowed on the net tract area after deducting street rights-of-way, environmentally sensitive areas (exclusive of buffers), and the required 15% of open space. The 40% density increase is reached by utilizing the following density bonus design factors: b. Design Factor Zero lot lines Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail If it connects to off-site trail system Public access to: vista or viewpoint Lake or stream Bonus Density % 3 5 10 4 3 3 4 3 3 5 4 3 10 Clustered units Mix of housing types Modulated building facades Variation in Roof Lines Retention of native vegetation Utilization of natural drainage Enhanced or increased sensitive area buffers Affordable housing units 6. Lot coverage provision in Chapter 22, Zoning Code, is amended to clarify that lot coverage is calculated based on the net lot area after the deduction of an access easement IV. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission bases its recommendation of adoption of the proposed amendments to the FWCC relative to subdivisions based on the following findings: 1. Whereas, the City's future growth will occur in the form of in-fill development on remaining vacant lots and larger 3 nonparcelized tracts; and 2. Whereas, existing subdivision regulations do flexible and innovative approaches to site housing development; ~nd not foster design and 3. Whereas, the proposed amendments are consistent with provisions of the Land Use and Housing chapters of Comprehensive Plan. the the 4. Whereas, the Federal Way SEPA responsible official has issued a Declaration of Nonsignificance on April 27, 1997; and 5. Whereas, the proposed code amendments would not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. £?¿d,}; ~ Robert Vaughan, Chal Federal Way Planning Commission 4 ......,-..---'"-....-......-.............. ,""""'-""" ""'" , ',:-' "', CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Planning Commission DATE June 4, 1997 APPLICANT City of Federal Way PROPOSED ACTION Text Amendments to Chapter 20, of Federal Way City Code (Subdivisions) STAFF REPRESENTATIVE Don Largen, AICP Planning Consultant McConnelVBurke, Inc, STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission use this report as basis upon which the Commission develops a recommendation of proposed Subdivision regulation amendments for City Council consideration. . I. INTRODUCTION Several items have been identified and prioritized by the City Council for completion during its 1997 Planning Commission work program. One of these tas~s is a review and update selected portions of the City's Subdivision regulations. II. BACKGROUND In January of 1994 City staff identified a list of topics within the Subdivisions regulations that needed to be addressed to either bring the code into compliance with State provisions, make them consistent with other city codes, or that would make them more helpful to staff and applicants and more applicable to the City's development context. Staff has since reviewed the subdivision regulations for consistency with State laws and other City codes. Most recently the subdivision regulations have been updated to comply with the State legislative requirements for regulatory reform (ESHB 1724). The remaining items on the list relate to making the subdivision regulations easier to use and more directly applicable to Federal Way. This list has been partially prioritized and reviewed again to make sure these items still need review. : " III. ISSUES & ALTERNATIVES The topics to be addressed fall into six general categories. Each of these issues contain several review items, with each item dealt with separately and provided with a staff recommendation. Relationships between discussion items are also indicated. A. SUBDIVISIONS (LONG PLATS) Subdivisions or long plats are one of the mechanisms by which tracts of land are divided into individual building lots or parcels. Under current City code a subdivision process (as opposed to a short subdivision) is required for divisions of land into five lots or greater. The subdivision process consists of two major parts. The first step is approval of a preliminary plat. Typically, a preliminary plat is meant to be general in nature and does not include detailed engineering specifications. In most cases preliminary plats establish the overall layout of the subdivision, indicating the proposed street network, general layout of blocks and lots, preliminary location of utilities, open spaces and sensitive areas, and other major elements of the subdivision. These are reviewed to ensure conformance with City zoning and engineering standards. This step is important in that many of the improvements (e.g. streets and sidewalks) become public and will later be taken over and maintained by the City. The second step is approval of a final plat, which is more specific as to the precise locations of utilities, public and private easements, actual number and configuration of individual lots, etc. Approval of a final plat is usually granted only after substantial completion or installation of the public improvements that were indicated on the preliminary plat. Final approval is required before property within the subdivision can be transferred or building permits issued. 1. PRELIMINARY PLATS The issue raised regarding preliminary plats is whether or not they can or should be processed administratively. An administrative review process does not require a public hearing. Under the current code, the hearings examiner holds a public hearing on a preliminary plat and then provides a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council then makes the final decision based on the established public record. Appeals of a Council decision are filed in King County Superior Court. Our conversations with staff suggest that the Council may wish to retain final approval of preliminary plat applications. This is clearly appropriate in those instances where concems are raised by adjoining property owners and where the subdivision is of a scale that could significantly affect the surrounding area. However, there are likely to be instances where a subdivision is modest in size, meets all City standards, and does not raise the concems of surrounding property owners. In these cases an administrative review process might be a better use of City resources and time, and would also help meet the requirements of ESHB 1724. 2 " One way to do this is to increase the minimum number of lots requiring a long subdivision application. The Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.095 gives the City legislative authority to increase the number of lots, tracts, or parcels to be regulated as short subdivisions to a maximum of nine. The short subdivision process is administrative so by increasing the number of lots qualifying as a short subdivision more subdivisions will be reviewed administratively. This approach appears particularly suited for Federal Way since much of the future growth will be in-fill development and would presumably involve smaller subdivisions. RECOMMENDATION: Make the following modification to Chapter 20: 1) Raise the minimum number of lots requiring a long subdivision from 5 lots to 10 lots in Article I, Section 20-1 Definitions. (Note: this will also require changing the definition of Short Plat). An additional approach the Planning Commission may wish to consider would be to have an administrative review of preliminary plats. RCW 58.17.020 allows for the administrative review of preliminary plats upon adoption of an ordinance to that effect. The ordinance must allow for appropriate notification of surrounding property owners, provide a comment period, and allow any effected party the ability to request that a public hearing be held. The City may also establish a threshold number of lots above which a public hearing would be required. For example, the City could provide for an administrative review of preliminary plats containing from 10 to 30 lots within Article II, Division 6. This would include the requirements from RCW 58.17.020, particularly the following provisions: a. Within at least 10 days notice of the application shall be published and mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposal and notice shall be posted in five conspicuous places around the proposal.' b. Any person may provide written comment on the proposed subdivision with 21 days after publishing notice of application. c. A public hearing shall be held if any person files a request for 'a hearing within 21 days of the publishing of the notice of application. d. A public hearing may also be initiated by the City. The key features of this approach are that it establishes a threshold above which an administrative review is not an option (i.e. 30 lots) and allows for a public hearing in the event an effected party requests one. Note that even though a preliminary plat may be reviewed administratively the final plat approval would still rest with the City Council. 3 " 2. TITLE REPORT WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT One of the items included on the list of code updates was to include a title report as a required application item for a preliminary plat. The recent code updates relative to regulatory reform did not address this item. The purpose of this requirement would' be to disclose at the beginning of the process whether or not some or all of the property to be subdivided is encumbered by ownership issues, deed restrictions, covenants, etc. In some cases knowing this information at the outset could enable the City to require that project sponsors resolve any civil legal issues before committing limited staff time to the review of the proposal. RECOMMENDATION: Add the following submittal requirement to Chapter 20, Division 6, Section 20.110(c): A complete and accurate title report, dated no more than 90 days prior to the application date, detailing all encumbrances, liens, covenants, restrictions, parties with interests, or any other legal commitment that is attached to the subject property(s). 3. LONG PLAT ALTERATfONSNACATION Current City regulations do allow for the revision of long plats, but are silent as to the process for vacation of an approved long plat. If a long plat alteration involves the relocation of driveways to streets external to the plat or there is an increase in the number of driveways, then the plat alteration process is the same as that required for preliminary plats: initial review by staff, staff report to hearings examiner and a public hearing, examiner recommendation to city council, and then city council approval. The basic issue is whether or not the plat alteration process can or should be made admin istrative. RCW 58.17.215 provides the basic procedural framework for the alteration of subdivisions. In general, if the proposed alteration involves a short plat or is considered a boundary line adjustment and does not create any additional lots, then the alteration may be reviewed and approved administratively by the planning director. Beyond that it appears that State law does not allow for the administrative alteration of long plats. If the intent of making plat alterations administrative is to make more efficient use of ' City resources and time, then it appears that' any reduction in the number of subdivisions permits that have to go through a full public review process would be a move in the right direction. Conversations with staff suggest that it is really the smaller subdivision applications where an administrative review process would best benefit both city staff and applicants. The City's subdivision alteration procedures already provide for as much administrative review as is allowed under State law. The exception may be the threshold 4 ", requirements relative to the relocation of driveways to streets external to the subdivision. These could be eliminated, but the rationale of requiring public review of alterations that would impact surrounding streets is a sound one and we would not recommend changing those thresholds. The one change that could be made to allow for more opportunity to administratively review alterations to smaller plats would be to raise the number of lots qualifying for short subdivision review from 4 lots to 9 lots. This would mean that all plats having fewer than 10 lots could be altered administratively. RECOMMENDATION: Increase the number of" lots that qualify as a short subdivision to a total of 9. (see also issue B.1 in the following section) As to the vacation of plats the RCW does not appear to allow for the administrative review and approval of long plat vacations. This is also true for short plats if the vacation involves some public dedication, such as a street. However, the City has no mechanism for plat vacation in its current regulations. RECOMMENDATION: Create a new Division 9 in Article II of Chapter 20 entitled Plat Vacations. Base the procedures for plat vacation on RCW 58.17.212. B. SHORT SUBDIVISION (SHORT PLAT) " A short subdivision is currently defined under City code as a division of land that creates four or fewer individual lots. The current process for short subdivisions provides for, an administrative review and approval by'the planning director, which includes review by affected utility providers. The, decision by the planning director is appealed to the hearings examiner. It should be noted that even though the approval process for short subdivisions is administrative the planning director must still review the proposed short plat relative to underlying City design and development standards. 1. INCREASE NUMBER OF LOTS One issue is whether to increase the allowed number of lots created under the short plat process. State law (RCW 58.17) allows a jurisdiction to raise the number of lots to nine. The advantage to raising the number of lots would be to allow for administrative review of smaller plats. This is related to the discussions under subdivisions above where the intent would be to streamline the City's overall subdivision processes. Another consideration is that future growth within the City will be largely from in-fill dëvelopment and likely involve the subdivision of smaller parcels or tracts. If such in-fill development meets City standards and has the effect of implementing the growth 5 '. strategy of the comprehensive plan, then administrative review of smaller subdivisions would be an appropriate mechanism for furthering the goals of the plan. RECOMMENDATION: Change the number of lots from 4 to 9 in the definition of short subdivisions in Article I, Section 20-1 Definitions. 2. OWNERSHIP OF CONTIGUOUS SHORT PLATS The issue here is that it is technically possible for a single individual or organization to own contiguous parcels and over time develop these parcels under a short plat process rather than use the long subdivision process. This poses a problem from the perspective of trying to plan for orderly incremental growth and the provision of public services and utilities since it allows for 'leap-frog' development. The City's current code structure is silent except for not allowing an exemption for alteration of a short subdivision if it is owned by the owner of a contiguous lot or parcel. The reasoning for the alteration of contiguously owned short subdivisions should also apply to their creation. In other words, the effect of developing several contiguously owned short subdivisions has the same overall impact as the development of a long subdivision and should be subject to public review. RECOMMENDATION: Add the following language to the end of the opening sentence in Section 20-81 : . ... PROVIDED, however, that this general procedure shall not apply if the proposed short subdivision is either simultaneously owned or has been owned within the previous five years by an owner of or a person having substantial financial interests in a contiguous lot, parcel, tract or short plat at the time of application; in which case the application procedures governing Division 6, Preliminary Plats, shall apply. . . The five year figure is used here since it is consistent with the period of time used for the completion of subdivisions and limitations on the use of the short subdivision process found in RCW 58.17. We should note that in our experience we have not seen an ordinance that deals directly with contiguous ownership 3. SHORT PLAT AL TERA TIONSN ACA TION Alteration or vacation of short plats is provided for in RCW 58.17.060. The RCW states that the City shall establish an administrative process for the review and approval of short plat applications, and the alteration or vacation of same. The issue here is what would be an appropriate process. . 6 ", ," The City's subdivision regulations do not appear to specify a process for either the alteration or the vacation of a short subdivision. Since the current short plat approval process is administrative it may make sense to simply utilize the existing process for the review of short plat alterations and vacations. RECOMMENDATION: Add short plat alterations and vacations to Division 5 of Article II In Chapter 20. This can be done either by adding two new sections at the end of the Division 5 or by Incorporating the words 'alteration' and 'vacation' Into the opening sections of Division 5. c. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS (PRD) One of the items on the code update list is to consider instituting a 'Planned Residential Development (PRO) process. The current subdivision regulations attempt to introduce some flexibility in residential plat layout by allowing a developer to cluster dwellings into one area of the parcel, with the intent of preserving open space and generally lessening the impacts of the development. In practice the clustering provisions have not worked well since there are essentially no incentives to encourage their use; for example the applicant is given no more lots than what is allowed under a standard subdivision process. There are also few guidelines relative to site design. A PRO provides more flexibility and discretion in site design and layout than the typical subdivision process. A PRD process offers incentives, usually density bonuses, for such things as open space, improved pedestrian circulation, building clustering, building design, etc. It allows a more flexible approach to accommodating site features such as slopes, wetlands, streams, and public areas. A PRO can also allow for innovative solutions to issues regarding impacts to adjacent properties and uses. At the heart of a PRO process are the incentives provided to encourage innovative and sensitive development. The City has been interested in encouraging the clustering of dwellings as a means to lessen the impact of new residential development on surrounding areas and preserve natural features. A density bo.nus. is not currently utilized for a clustered subdivision, but should be considered for a project if clustering is used. However, clustering by itself is no guarantee of the type of development the City may want. The provision and quality of open spaces, building layout and orientation, pedestrian amenities, protection of sensitive areas, and other items contribute to quality development and could be included in a bonus system. We have provided staff with a draft set of PRO regulations, which include the following recommended standards and bonuses. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a set of PRD regulations that establish the following standards and bonus system: " 7 " " PROCESS. PRDs shall be reviewed as referenced iq Article II, Division 6, PreliDÚnary Plat, and Division 7, Final Plat. MINIMUM SIZE. The minimum contiguous area of a PRD project shall be two acres. We have rarely seen PRD ordinances with less than a two acre minimum. On tracts less than two acres there is often not enough space for flexibility in lot locations, lot configurations, access, and meaningful protection of environmental features. We suggest this minimum since the size appears to fit with the in-fill growth pattern of the City. DESIGN CRITERIA - GENERALLY. (a) The design criteria established within this article shall be used as a guide for an applicant to follow in developing a preliminary and ~al PRD plan. (b) These criteria shall also be used as the basis for recommendation and decisions regarding density increases within a PRD. DEsIGN CRITERIA - REQUIRED OPEN SPACE. (a) For the purpose of this article, open space shall be described and provided in all PRDs as referenced in Article ill Section 20-155(a) through (0. Note also the discussions concerning open space requirements on page 11, section 'E' of this report. DESIGN CRITERIA - SINGLE-FAMILY PRDs. (a) Lot size. A maximum reduction of 25 percent for DÚnimum lot size for PRDs located in single-family RS residential zones may be permitted according to the following partial reductions for designated design criteria. The reductions are additive, but in no case may they exceed 2S percent in total. The exact amount of each partial reduction is determined by the planning director. ' The primary incentive for using the PRD approach in a single family zone is the ability to create more lots than is allowed in a èonventional subdivision. The greater the percent reduction in lot size the more lots are created. However, the Comprehensive Plan has a goal of preserving the character of single family neighborhoods. The maximum lot reduction allo~ed should not be so great as to introduce density that is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. A 25% reduction is suggested here because larger reductions produce lot sizes that are less than the lot size of the next higher density zoning district, which may not be compatible with existing neighborhoods. 8 (1) A maximum reduction of 6 percent may be granted if at least 2S percent of the gross land area of the PRD site is reserved as open space pursuant to the guidelines set forth in section 20-155. An additional reduction of 3 percent (9 percent cumulative) may be granted if at least 35 percent is reserved as open space; (2) A maximum reduction of 7 'percent may be granted if unusual or significant site features such as views, watercourses, wetlands or other natural characteristics are enhanced or incorporated into the PRD design; (3) A maximum reduction of 5 percent may be granted by the use of existing trees and mature vegetation or innovative landscaping methods for streetscapes,.open spaces, or recreational areas; and (4) A maximum reduction of 7 percent may be granted by the inclusion of features such as variation in building setbacks, use of materials consistent with surrounding neighborhoods, clustering of buildings, zero lot lines, or energy-efficient siting. The design criteria are the basis upon which lot sizes are decreased and more lots created. The percentages given above are similar to many codes we have worked with and are suggested as a starting point. Each of the percent figures gives a numerical weight to each of the design categories and are intended to reflect the relative importance of each. DESIGN CRITERIA - MULTI-FAMILY PRDs. (a) Density increase. A density increase of 30 percent greater than that permitted by the underlying zoning may be allowed for PRDs located in multi-family (RM) residential zones according to the following partial density increases for designated design criteria. The density increases are additive, but in no case may they exceed 30 percent in total. The exact amount of each partial density increase is determined by the review authority. (1) A maximum reduction of 6 percent may be granted if at least 2S percent of the gross land area of the PRD site is reserved as open space pursuant to the guidelines set forth in section 20-155. An additional reduction of 3 percent (9 percent cumulative) may be granted if at least 35 percent is reserved as open space; (2) A maximum reduction of 7 percent may be granted if unusual or significant site features such as views, watercourses,. wetlandS or other natural characteristics are enhanced or incorporated into the PRD design; (3) A maximum reduction of 5 percent may be granted by the use of existing trees and mature vegetation or innovative landscaping methods for streetsca'pes, open spaces, or recreational areas; and (4) A maximum reduction of7 percent may be granted by the inclusion of features such as variation in building setbacks, use of materials consistent with surrounding neighborhoods, clustering of buildings, zero lot lines, or energy-efficient siting. (5) A maximum increase of 5 percent may be granted if a variety of housing types is provided, such as duplexes, fourplexes attached single family, town houses, etc. (b) Required perimeter buffer vme. A minimum 30 foot buffer zone must be provided for any PRD of multifamily structures in the RM zone that is adjacent to a RS or SE zoning district. The buffer zone must be kept free of buildings, structures or parlång areas and . 9 " " must be landscaped, screened or protected by natural features so that adverse effects on surrounding areas are minimized. DESIGN CRITERIA - STREETS.. (a) Right-of-way width and street roadway widths may be reduced, especialiy where it is found that the plan for the PRD provides for the separation of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and provides for adequate off-street parlång facilities as deemed appropriate by the public works director. D. BINDING SITE PLANS A binding site plan is another way of legally laying out and developing a parcel. They have typically been uSed for developing commercial and industrial sites, but can be utilized for mobile home and recreational vehicle parks, and condominium developments as allowed under RCW 58.17. It is a somewhat streamlined subdivision process in that it assumes strict compliance with the underlying zoning and, as such, is often processed administratively. It can differ from a subdivision in several ways. The land is often held in one ownership and parceled as leaseholds rather than for sale. Internal roadways and utility corridors are more likely to be privately maintained instead of being dedicated to the City. A binding site plan may not necessarily divide the larger parcel into separate lots, but rather may simply locate the different uses and major features in relation to each other. There are typically no incentives such as density bonuses or height increases in a binding site plan process. The issues raised regarding binding site plans are 1} to review for appropriate process, 2} add provisions for their alteration, 3} allow this process to be used for condominiums, mobile home and recreational vehicle parks, and 4} clarify that these regulations are for ground leases only. In the recent code amendments relative to regulatory reform the City adopted an administrative review process, essentially utilizing the same process as for short subdivisions. Since City staff has just recently addressed this issue we have no further recommendation. RCW 58.17.040 allows for a binding site plan process to be used for condominiums, mobile home and recreational parks. The City simply needs to add these uses to the binding site plan process. RECOMMENDATION: Make the following changes to Chapter 20: 1) Article II, Division 4, Section 20-61: Add condominiums, manufactured home parks, and recreational vehicle parks to the list of uses requiring a binding site plan. 10 . .. 2) Article I, Section 20-3 Exemptions: Add condominiums having an approved binding site plan to the list of exemptions. 3) Article I, Section 20-1 Definitions: Clarify that a binding site plan applies to ground leases only. (Note: The same change should be made to the definitions of Short Subdivision and Subdivision also in Section 20-1) Current City regulations are silent regarding the alteration of an approved binding site plan. Since the recently proposed approval process for a binding site plan is administrative based on the short subdivision process, then it appears to makes sense to utilize that process for alterations. RECOMMENDATION: Add a new section, 20-66 Alteration of Binding Site Plans ,to Division 4 which states that alterations of an approved binding site plan shall follow the same process as stipulated for short subdivisions in section 20-81. E. OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS Several questions have been raised relative to open space requirements within the subdivision processes: 1) Should fee-in-lieu payments apply to long plats? A fee-in-lieu payment would allow a developer to make a monetary contribution to a fund rather than provide open space within the subdivision itself. City regulations do not now provide for fee-in-lieu contributions for subdivisions with lots greater than 5 acres. One factor to consider is that subdivisions can vary dramatically in size. Requiring open space in a relatively small subdivision may not create a quality community space. In addition, if a community has an overall park and open space plan there is the question of how the open spaces created in subdivisions fit into the plan. Many communities have found that by requiring open spaces in all subdivisions they have ended up with many disparate pieces that do not fit into a larger open space framework. Allowing for the option of making a fee-in-lieu payment does provide for somewhat greater flexibility and City control as to where and what kind of open space and park resources get developed. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Allow for a fee-in-lieu payment to be made at the discretion of the parks director after consideration of the City's park plan, quality, location and service area of the open space that would otherwise be provided within the project. The fee-in-lieu of open space shall be calculated on 15% of the most recent assessed value of the property. In 11 the absence of an assessment, the market value shall be based on an appraisal conducted by a MAl certified appraiser or another professional appraiser approved by the parks director. 2) Eliminate the requirement for open space within short subdivisions. 2 Should lar e lot subdivisions 1 + acre lots hav 0 e s ace re uirements? An open space requirement is intended to provide for adequate public open space within subdivisions. Someone owning a 1 acre residential lot is unlikely to be suffering from a lack of open space opportunities. If in the future the zoning for that area were to change, then open space would be provided based on the land being divided into smaller sized urban lots. RECOMMENDATION: Do not include open space requirements in the review and approval of subdivisions having 1 acre lots or larger. 3) Should open space dedications apply to resubdivided parcels if the dedication was previously met? In a number of communities any time new lots are created the open space requirements apply, regardless of whether the original division met the requirements in effect at the time. However, these communities also employ an impact fee structure which lends itself to being administered on a per lot basis. Federal Way does not use impact fees for parks and open space, so provision of open space is accomplished through the subdivision standards As pointed out in #1 above this can be a problematic approach. However, this question is stated in terms of dedications of open space. If the original plat dedicated an actual tract of land, -then it is unlikely that a functionally sized tract would remain for further open space dedication. This of course would depend on lot sizes within the plat, but in most cases requiring an additional land dedication upon the division of several of the lots will likely be impractical. RECOMMENDATION: Do not impose open space dedications on resubdivided parcels if a dedication had been made at the time of the previous plat. 4) Should the categories relative to how open space is calculated be changed? The categories of open space used in the subdivision regulations do not appear to require any modification. Other codes we have worked with or reviewed have similar categories. Some codes use terms such a 'improved open space' or 'passive' versus 'active' recreation areas, but there is no inherent advantage of using certain terms or definitions over others. This open space classification system 12 appears adequate for Federal Way's purposes. We are not aware of any other issues relative to these open space categories' and do not recommend any change in these categories at this time. A related consideration would be whether or not to allow for the alteration of the percentages of open space types on an individual basis. A particular subdivision may have a preponderance of one type of open space opportunity and not be able to meet the open space requirements in the other categories. In such cases it may be in the City's best interests to modify the percentages in order that the open space type that is there can be fully accommodated by allowing the applicant to count that one type in meeting their open space requirement. One approach would be to allow for the administrative alteration of the open space type percentages by the parks director based on some general criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Allow for the administrative alteration of the open space category percentage requirements on a case-by-case basis. Review of such cases would be performed by the parks director and would be based on the following considerations: 1. The change In percentage requirements would result In a superior open space plan than could be accomplished under the standard percentage requirements. " 2. The availability and types of open space located within the Immediate area. 3. The presence on-site of environmental features that are unique or rare or of local importance. 4. The opportunities for the preservation of significant views and creation of public access to points of interest. 5. The relationship of the proposed open sp~ces to the City's park plan. 13 oIL. F. Flag (Panhandle) Lots Panhandle or flag lots are lots that are created such that the access to a public street is over a long narrow extension of the lot. Staff has raised several questions and are seeking clarification on several issu~s relative to flag lots. 1. MEASURING LOT WIDTH Subdivision regulation Section 20-152(c) states that all lots should abut a public street. The question raised is if a long narrow lot were subdivided would it be creating one or more flag lots? If that were true how would lot width be measured? It is unlikely that flag lots would be approved under a long subdivision or PRO process. However, there are situations on older larger lots where there is sufficient space to subdivide, but the lot is relatively narrow. In these situations flag .Iots might be created to provide access to a public street, however we Figure 1 have rarely seen situations where there are 'nested' flag lots. Access could just as easily be accomplished via an easement across the front lot or across an already established flag lot access. This would eliminate the need for the 'pole' portion of a flag lot. In cases where such lots are created measuring lot width should be done behind the point where the 'pole' of the flag lot extends out from the main body of the lot. RECOMMENDATION: Do not allow more than one flag lot to be created out of any given narrow parcel of land. If multiple lots can be created the remaining Interior lots shall be given easements across the flag lot to provide access to public streets. 14 Lot A Lot Width . - - LotB +- -Lot B Access LotC . . Street ", 2. SETBACKS ON FLAG LOTS The issue here is basically how to determine which are the front, rear, and side yards on flag lots. We have dealt with this issue in several client communities and there is really no good specific formula or criteria that covers all potential flag lot configurations and relationships to adjacent lots. What we have done is use a generalized approach to establishing setbacks that relies on the arrangement of the yards on adjacent lots. In general where the yards of a subject lot abut side yards of adjacent lots, then those yards are the subject lot's side yards; and where it abuts front or rear yards on adjacent lots, those yards on the subject lot become the front or rear yards. RECOMMENDATION: Utilize the following approach in determining the yards on flag lots: The front yard of a flag lot shall be that yard which is adjacent to where the 'pole' portion of the 'lot connects with the main portion of the lot; UNLESS if in the judgment of the planning director the arrangement of setbacks on adjacent surrounding lots clearly suggest a different yard arrangement. 0"- Figure 2 Rear .. .... .............. ......... ............ '.'" Lot A "".".""'.. ........"..... """"" ...... Rear ............. ....... ".""""""" LotB ..... .".""". .... ............ ....... Rear ....... .......................... .0... LotC ..................................... Street 3. CALCULATING LOT SizE/LoT COVERAGE RELATIVE TO EASEMENTS Staff is looking for clarification on how to measure lot coverage where there are lots with reciprocal access easements. This question has been asked in terms of two panhandle lots, but this would apply to any easement situation. This is not strictly a subdivision issue, but is related. Calculation of lot coverage is found in the zoning code Section 22-955. It states: . A vehicular access easement or tract that serves more than one lot will not be used in determining compliance with the maximum lot coverage requirement of this chapter.. Our experience with other codes suggests that the intent of this language is to calculate lot coverage exclusive of the area of a recorded access easement. In other words, lot coverage will be calculated after the area of the easement is deducted form the total lot area. 15 -------,,_...., .., . RECOMMENDATION: Amend Section 22-955 to state that lot coverage is calculated based on the net lot area after the deduction of the area of an access easement. v. CON ClUSIONS These recommendations are intended to address the issues raised by staff on certain specific items in the subdivision regulations. It is not meant as a comprehensive update since the City has recently gone through an update to several portions of its code. These recommendations should provide a means for clarifying and streamlining the overall subdivision process. 16 . . (BLt6 ON DI/I.LJ TZ : 01 1."" L6/6V!ìO :>rOn ura¡r . rlunneu I'e~'uclluu, UI:"l:wJltm:m ~U:SMIUI""'" Chapter 20 SUBDMSIONS Article ##, Planned Residential Developments Sec. 20-301 Sec. 20-302 Sec. 20-303 Sec. 20-304 Sec. 20-305 Sec. 20-306 Sec:. 20-307 Sec. 20.308 Sec. 20-309 Sec:. 20-310 Sec. 20-311 Sec. 20-312 Sec:. 20-3]3 Sec:.2()'314 Sec. 20-315 Sec. 20-316 Sec. 20-317 Scc.20-318 Sec. 20-319 Sec. 20-320 Soc. 20-321 Sec. 20-322 Sec. 20-323 Soc. 20-324 Sec. 20-325 Sec.2Q.326 Sec. 20-327 Sec. 2()'328 Sec.2().329 See. 20-330 Sec. 20-331 Sec. 20-332 Sec. 20-333 Sec. 20-334 Sec. 20-335 Sec. 20-336 See. 20-337 Sec. 20-338 Sec. 20-339 Purpose. Minimum size. Permitted USC$. Prcapplicaòon conference. Conformance with applicable codes and standards. Preliminary PRD - Application Corm and content. Prc1imlnary PRD . Acceptance of application; routing. Preliminary PRD . Tune limitation for approval or disapproval. Preliminal)' PRD . Completion of environmental policy process. Preliminary PRD . Process for review. Preliminary PRD . Official file. Preliminary PRD - Notice of application. Preliminary PRO - Notice of public hearing. Preliminal)' PRO. Report to hearing examiner; review. PreJimiruuy PRD - Public bearing. . Preliminary PRD - Electronic sound IeCording. Prellmimuy PRO. Burden of proof. Preliminary PRD - Public comments and parucipation at the hearing. Preliminary PRD - Continuation or the bearing. Preliminary PRD - Rccommcndl11ion by the bCc1J'ing examiner. Preliminary PRD - City councillCvicw. action. Preliminary PRD - Notice of decision. Preliminary PRD - Judicial review. PreJiminary PRD - Duration of approval. F'mal PRD - Fonn and content. Final PRD. Administrative review. Final PRD - Planrung commission review. Pinal PRD - City council action. Pinal PRD - Appeal of city coucH decsion. Final PRD . Amendments. Building permit issuance. Construction start and completion limits. Review during construction. PRD public services aŸaitabUity. De.~ign criteria - GeneraJly. De.orign criteria - Required open space. Design criteria - Single-family PRDs. Design criteria - Multi-family PRDs. Design criteria - Streets. . " 3/26/97 J GO'd RI:nI nHJ JR-R~-Á"U £RLt6 ON DI/I~] "".,. """"", ""A-' 1Z : l .lB.L L6/6Z/S0 ¡JWJJ VIUJI - r WIUIC:U "c:",uC"uu. L'c",avy"oc.." ."'5""""""" Sec. 20-301 Pur¡>o~e. A planned rcsidënrinl development (PRD) is an altcrnéltive to conventional land use regulations, combining use, density (II,d site plan considcm[Ìons into a single process. A planned residential development has the following purposes: (it) To permit greater flexibility and consequcnl1ý more c:rearivc and imaginative site dc.c:ign than is generally possible undc:t' conventional subdivision and loning regulations: (b) To promote more cconomicnl and efficient UOIC of the land white providing a harmoniouo; v2lIÏety of housing choices, a higher level of city attractiveness and quality anti preservation of scenic open space; and (c) To encourage developments which will provide a dc.'¡irable and slnblc environment in harmony with thal or the sulTounding area. (d) To luovidc nexibility in site development in order to prcsCtve and protect open spaces and environmentally sensitive areas. See. 10.302 Minimum si:1.e. The minimum conligu,iu~ ~ of a PRD project is two acrc..'\. See. 20-303 Permitted uses. A planned residential development may include any uses pcnnÎlled ourright in the undðr1ying residential zune where the PRD is located, subject to the criteria established in this chapTer. Sec. 20.304 PreappUcation conference. For the purposes of expediting apptications and n.'f.fuc:ing PRO development costs, before filing any application for n PRD, the prospective app1icanl shall submil 10 the director of community development scrvicc.o¡ preliminary plans and sketches and basic site infonnalion for consideration and advice regarding the relation of the propusal to general developmental objectives and city policies. AClcr lCview of the preliminary plans by the director, a prcapplciaûon conference will he hcld 10 discuss land use, site design, required improvcme:nl'i and conformance with the comprehensive plan, 7.oning ordinançe and subdivision . code. The director may request the attendance of other slnCr members at the prcapplication çonference. A wrillcn recol'd of the preapplication conference shan be given to [he applicant within 30 calendar days after the mccûng with the applicant. and a eopy shall be retained on file for future t\;fcrcnce, See. 20.305 Conformao(e with applicable codes and standards. All applications for preJjminary anti final PRD appfovl1l shall be in conformance with the zoning code and official 7.nningomaps of the city, In the event an amendment to the zoning code and/or a change in Ihe 7.oning maps is required to assure !!Uch conformance, the director of community development services sl1all require that the appropriate applications for such change be submitled so (bat such requestS may he considered concumntly, Preliminary PRD . Application fonD and content. (a) After an applicant has a preapplication conference, the applicant may tile an application for preliminary PRD. The pre1iminary PRD application shall be filed with the dcpartmcnl or communilY development serviees on fonns furnished by the city. Applications shall be made by the owner or owners of the parcels of all property encompassed by the application or by a duly authorized agent or agents, The owner Or owners of all parcels to be included must join iñ or be represented in the application. An applicant may ...-ubmit applications for preliminary and final PRD approvnl simultaneously, PROVIDED. all information required pursuanllo articlc is submitted. (b) The application for preliminary PRD ¡;hall he accompanied by the following informa~ion: (I) A legal description and map of the property drawn to scale which shall include: the Innd nrea within the PRD, the uo;c zoning cJassiflc.1tion of the designated area, the zune classification and use of all abutting districts within three hundred feel oc d\e subject properly, amI aU public and private rights-of-way and clISCmcnts bounding and intersecting the designated area. which are proposed lo be continued. created, relocated and/or abandoned; (2) A title ~ performed for [he property(¡;); (3) A PRD plan, drawn al a scale of nor Ie.o;.s than one inch per two hundred feet, and II written description DC the proposed developmenl The PRD plan and/or the description shall show or stipulate the general location, alT(\ngemen~. ~xtent. and character for the following where applicable: See. 20.306 3/26/CJ7 2 £D'c! ....., .~, ~... ,~~~ ..... . . [flLt6 ON Dl/Il.] lZ:01 k ~ L616Z/S0 ~n...u UI"'J' - .. .......,.... ......-..,..- """"'-1""'-- "-0--'- 8. Adjacent slrcCts and alleys: b. l.nnd u.'ICS by type. including the gross acreage or square footage of cach proposed use; ~. Structures or building envelopes by lype of use. maximum height of SttUÇture.'!, maximum gross fluor area for each land usc, and land coverage of buildinSS and impervious area-'!; d. Residential densities by housing type and maximum numbot of dwelling units; c. Inlerior streets and drives; f. Parking, loading and outdoor storage areas and acce....... thereto. including areas for stornge of boats. campers, trailers and recreation vehicles; g. Public and pñvate open and reçrcation space; h. Landscaped materials: including typical arca.q Buffer arec"s and fencing including purpose and timing of con.'!lIUction; j. Pedestrian cm:ulation; k. Existing and proposed .utilities c.'\Sements: i. and I. School ~itcs; m. Dimensions of separations be[Wccn buildings, streets and othtr features; n. (.nnd dedications and public improvements; o. Areas subject to flooding. retention areas and surface dminage; p. Location. siu and lighting of signs; q. Treatment of sound, vibration. glare, radiation, Ñn)C$, and beat emission which will extend beyond me zone lot; and f. Other clements ¡u<:h IS archilccNral c;onccpl'!, building elevations, facade treatments. and exterior building materials a.o; nccc.UW)' to establish how I.hc proposed PRO uses and Sb"UCtUl"CS rc(91e to the neighboring prClperty. (4) Application for a substantial development pannit if required by the shoreline ma.'Iter program ordinance; . (5) Application to alter or pcrfonn work in an environmentaJly sensitive area if required by City ordinancc; (6) SEPA environmenmi checklist pursuant lO the BnvironmentaJ Policy Act; (1) A written litatemcnt gcntra11y describing the propos<:d PRD and the market which it is intended to. suve; its relationship to the comprehensive plan; and how the proposed PRD is to relate to the use of nelgf\boring property; (8) SlaLCntent of the applicant's intentions with regard to the future 5Cmng or leasing of all or portions of the PRO, such as land areas, dwelling units, etc.: (9) A. development schedule showing the approximate date of proposed construction and whether or not the project is intended to be developed in phases. If the PRD is to be developed in phases, a phasing plan is required. The phasing plan shan he submitted Cor the tolD! project visualized by the applicanL The phasing plan shaD identify the geographic area of each phase and shall present a broad but cohesive and complete overview of the project. Preliminary PRD applications for Cc1Ch PRD pha.'iC shall include all materials required by subsection (b) of this section; (lO)Other information deemed necessary by the director of community development services to evaluate the preliminary PRO application. The request for additional information must be mnde in writing to the applicant within twenty-eight calendar days after the submission of the preliminary appticalion. (c) The director of community development scrviL'CS may waive any information required by subsection (b) of this section on d1e basis that ,the information is DOl necessary to 8 review of the propo~ PRD. Such waiver shall be in writing and shall specify the reasons for such waivtr. PreIioún1\x-y PRD . Acceptance of appHcaUon; routing. (4) Within 28 calendar days of receiving an application for preliminary PRÐ, the city must determine whether the application is complclc. A checklist for determining complete appJica1ions is available through lbe department of community development services. If the city deems the application to be complete, a Letler of Completeness must be issued prior to the 28 day deadline. If the city See. 20-307 3/26/97 3 vO'J 61:01 nHl L6-6G-AijU [SU6 ON Dl/I.l] lZ: ilR1 L6/6Z/ÇO of. -- -. -J- a -~.- -'-~-""-' - -. ---r .---.- -'-0"'-""'. determines the application to be ineomplclo, the city shull notify the arl,liC4n1 of what needs to be submitted for a complete application. In this written determination, the chy shall all identify, to the extent known 10 the city. lhe other agencíe.~ of local. state or federal government that may have juñsdiction over some ~"pcCt or the proposed development activity. Within Councen calendar days after nn applicant has submlucd the additional information identified by the city as being necessary for a complete application. the city shan nodry the applicant whether the application is complete or whether additional information is ncCCS!c:uy . (b) A project pennit application is complete for purpo:ïCS of this secùon when it meets city's procedural submission requirements and is sufficient for continued prOCC$Sing even though additional information may be required or project modifications m."y be undertaken subsequently. A determination of completeness shall not preclude the city from reque.~ing additional information or studies either at the time of the Notice of Completeness or su~ntIy if ncw Information js required or substantial changes in the proposed action occur. (c) Upon 5ubmilbl of a completed preliminary PRD application, the department of community devctopment services shall Inm:.,rut at least one copy of the application for review and recommendation 10 each of d1C fonowing: (1) Public works d~arunent: (2) Parks department; (3) School District No. 210: (4) I..akehaven Utility District and City of Tacoma public utiU[y department, if necessary utilities wjJJ be provided by the City of Tacoma; (5) Fire District *39; and (6) Utility companies proposed to provide electricity. telephone. natUral gas, cable television, and solid waste collection. (d) A preliminary PRD application shall not be deemed complc:tc and acc:cptcd for filing for the purposc of official processing until: (I) TI1C dlreCtnr of community development sc:rviocs determines 1I1Id the appliçant has paid a11 fees nnd submitted all documents and infonn81Íon as required herein to permit a full public hearing upon the merits of the application; and (2) The director of eonununity development ,;crvicos has rcccivcd a notice of availabi1Îly from (he Lakehavcn Utility District and City of Tacoma public utilities department for sewer nnd wafer. a.~ appropriate. S Prdiuúnary PRD . Time limitation ~ ~ for approval or di...approval. \ . A complete preliminary PRÐ applicati shall be approved, disapproved, or resumed to applicant for modificaùon or correction wilhin 18 caJcndar days from date of filing thereof, unless the applicant consents to an eXtension of such time period: PROVIDED, that the ] 80 day period shall not indude the time spent preparing and circulating environmental -.L documents as ~uired. 1'hL I &> d ':!1 ~ ~ Nt tl I'1VT= ,~-f-t.~ 1M ,~l!~ ~s. a I.y: r I)e r ~ I rn\«: M. ~20-30~~ ~minnry RD - roo.uPleti(Jn~ environmental policy process. A preliminary PkD application will nor be NChc.dulal for public hearing until the Stare Environmental Policy Act revicw process has been completed. If there is an appeal of the threshold determination. d1e appeaJ hearing shan be held simultaneously with the public hearing in front of the hearing examiner on the preliminary PRD application. Said hearing ¡;hall be scheduled within 90 days from the date of the appeal of the threshold dcttrmination. See. 20-308 Preliminary PRO - Process tor reYiew. Upon confirmation by the director of community development services that the preliminary PRD application is complete and that aU pertinent requirements of the Environmental Policy. scction 18-26 ct seq. have been fulfilled, the application shall' be processed and reviewed See. 20-310 See. 20.311 Preliminary PRD . Official file. (a) ConlenU. The director of community development services d1al1 compile an official file on the applicalion containing the following: (1) All application materil11$; submitted by the applicant; (2) The staff report (3) All written comments received on the mntCcr; (4) ]he electronic recording of the public hearing On the matter, 3/26/97 4 SOOd n?:nlmn JR-R?-lHU (8¿Þ6 ON DII:U] ll:01 L L616llg0 ~"'JJ £""'J" - £ ............ ,,-........-.... "'~'~"'r"-'- "-0-- - .- (5) .JliC recommendation of rhe heañng examiner; (6) 11iC electronic sound recording and minu[cs of the city council proceedings on the matter. (7) The decision of city council; and (8) Any other information relevant to tho manor. (b) Availability. 1'he official file is a public record. It is available for i~-pcctlon and copying in the department of community development SClVic:cs during regular business hours. See. 20-312 Preliminary PRD . Notice of application. (a) Cnntelrrs. Witlùn 14 days of Iho Letter of Complclcnçss being Í$$ued, the director of community development services shall pn.-p&re and publish a notice of application within thc local newspaper of general circulation. The notice of application sball contain the following: ( I) The name of (he npplicant and. if app1icable. ilie project name; (2) The sacet ,"Idress of the subject propc:r1y or. if this is not availab1c. It localional desçription in nonlcglll language. fixccpt for notice published in the official newspaper of the city, the notice must 1\150 include a vicinity map that identifies the: subject propeny; . (3) The citation of the provision of this chapter describing the applied-for decision; (4) A brief verbal dcSt."Iiption of the reque.~ decision; (5) A list of the project pcnnits included in the application; (6) A list or all required smdics subrniUtd with d1C 8pplic~tion; (7) 11\c date of application, the date of the notice or completion of the application, and the date ofthc ~ v.-~ notice of the application; , 0,,1 \ \Ot (8) A statement that notification of the public .."J:t- h~ring date win occur ~proxltl12ltel)' 14 days !"V \t.~ poor to the scheduled heanng date; \ 1 â. (9) A statement of the avai1ability of the officiaJ file; (10) A SU\tcment of the right of any peROn to submh wñuen comments to the hearing cltaminer and appear at the public bearing of the hearing examiner to give comments orally; and (11) A statement Iha1 o,nly persons who submit written or oral comments to the hearing examine¡' may challenge OlC rccomtncndation of the hearing examiner, (b) Distribution. The director of community development servioe.& shall distribute this notice as: follows: (1) A eopy willobc sent to the persons receiving the property tax slJslcmcnts for all properly within '300 feet of each boundary of the subject property; (2) If the owner or the property which is proposed for the PRD owns another part.-cl. or parcels. of property which tic adjacent to the properly. notice of application shall be given to owners of property located within 300 feel of any portion of \be boundaries of such adjacently located parcels of property owned by the owner of the property proposed to be in the PRD¡ (3) A copy shan be mai1cd to appropriate city or county officials if the proposed PRD lies within one mile of an adjoining ciey or county boundary; (4) A eopy shall be mailed to aU parties listed in Section 20-307(c); (5) Notice shan be mailed to the state departmcnl of tr8nsportation if the proposed PRD abuts a state highway; (6) A copy will be pubJished in the official newspaper of the city; and (1) A copy will be posted on each of the official notification boards of the city and at public librañes within the city. (c) Public "oliJicarion sign. The applicant shall crecl at least one public Dutification sign which complics with standards developed by the department of community development services. This sign shaU he locatc4 on or neal the subject plOpcny fncing the righl-of-way or vehic1e access easement or tract provIding direct vehicle access to subject property. The diredOr of community development services may requiTe the placement of additional public notice sign.'! on or near the subject property if he or a:he determines that this is appropriate to provide notice to the public. (d) TIming. The pub1ic nolification sign or signs must be in place at 1C8Sl 14 calendar days after the Lcllcr of Comp1etencss has been issued. an<l removed within seven calendar days after the fina1 decision of the city on the man:er. ... 3/26/97 5 90 'd OG:Ol nHl L6-6G-AijW. . . (SH6 ON DI/:UJ TZ: ( lHl. L6/6Z/!;O ""'.. """'J> . . _.n.... ......--...-. -~._.-,..._.- .'-0--'- Prelinlinary PRD - Notice ofpubJic hearing. (n) CfJ1I1t!1It.f. Atlcast 14 calendar days prior to !he dale of the public heuring. the director of community development :occvices shall distribute a public notice in essentially the same form as the notice of application, except that a public hearing date will be scheduled. (b) Distribution. The public notice shall be mailed to all pcr~onS and agencies who received the original notice of application. In addirlon. any ~rson specifically requesting to be notified or who submitted cOmments as a result of the notice of application shall be notified at this time. (c) Public nolificatwn sign. The director of community development services shalt have changes Itk'\dc to ilia public notification sign or signs erected at the time of notice of application [0 reflect any changes in the application. including the scheduled date of the public hc.'tring. (d) Timing. The public notification sign or signs mu...[ be removed within seven calendar days after the final decision of thc ciry on the matter. Sec. 20-313 Preliminary PRD - Report to hearing examiner; review. (a) No less than seven days pñor to the datc of the public hearing. the department of community devcl<'pment scrvicc.r,¡ shall submit to dle heOU'ing examiner a wriucn report summarizing the application. The report shull contain the following infonnation: (I) All pertinent application materials. (2) An analysis of the application under the relevant provisions of this chapter and the comprehensive phm. Sec. 20-314 (3) ^ statement of the facts found by the director of community cJc\'elopment services and the conclusions drawn from those factS. (4) A notice of availability from tbe Lakchaven Utility District and City of Tacoma public utilities ~partment as appropriate. (5) All conununicéuions from other agencies or individuals relating to the applicaüon which were received in time (0 be included in the report to the hearing examiner. (6) A list ot reçommendations from she department of community development services. department of public works and other appropriate deparlments relating to alterations conditions of PRD approval. (7) A copy of the declaration of nonsignificance. mitigated declaration of nonsignificance. draft environmental impact stal&mcnt and final environmental impact statement.o¡ along with a list of any required mitilfdtion mea.'iurcs issued by the responsible official. (b) The hearing examiner shall review the preliminary PRO for compliance with this article and od1er applicable orcÍìnanccs or regulations oC the city. See. 20.315 Pn1iminary PRD -.Public hcttring. (a) Gl!nt!ral.. The hearing examiner shall hold a public hearing on each appJic.1tion. (b) Open to public. The he..uings of the hearing examiner are open to the public. (c) Effect 1'he hearing of [he hearing examiner is tbe open record hearing for city council on the application. The city council shall nOt hold another open record heañng on Ihe application. Preliminary PRD - Electronic sound recanting. The hearing examiner shall make a complete electronic sound recording of each public hearing. See. 20.316 Preliminary PRD - Durden or proof'. The 1tppliCMt has the responsibility of convincing the city that. under the provision of article. the applicant is entitled to the œqucsred decision. See. 20.311 Prcliminary PRD . Public comments and participation at the bearing. Any person may participate in' the public hearing in either or both of the following ways: (1) By submitting written comments to the hearing examiner. either by delivering Lhcse conunents to the department of community development services prior to she hearing or by giving tllese directly to the hearing examiner at the heañng. (2) By appcming in person. or dlrough a representative. at the hearing and making oral conunenrs directly to the hearing examiner. The hearing examiner DUly reasonably limit the extent of oral comments to facilitate the orderly and timely conduct of the bearing. See. 20-318 3/26/97 6 LO'd 12:01 nRI. JR-R~-ABU . . [8Lt6 ON DI/I~) TZ : 01 ~ L6/6VSO . ¡:,raJJ IJra¡r ~ rlannea J{eslaenßaI LleyelUpmclII AC/:uu-.UtlS Prc!liminary PRO - Continuation of the hearing. 111C hearing examiner may continue the hearing if. Cor any reason. he or she is unable to hear all of the public comments on the matter or if the hearing examiner dctcnnines that he or she needs' more information un the matter. If, during the hearing, the hcnring cx:ul1incr announces the time and p1acc of the next hearing on the matter and a notice thereof is posted on the door of the bearing room, no further notice of milt hearing need be given. See. 20-3J9 Preliminary PRD . Recommendation by the bearing ex.'\m1ner. (Ii) GelU!rCllly, Afrer cOn.~dCriDg aU of !he inConnmion and comment'! submitted on the matter, the hec1ring exnminer shan issue a wriuen recommendation to the city council. See, 20.320 (b) Timing. Unless a longer period is mutually aBreed to by the npplicant and the hearing cxamùJ.er, the hecving exnminer mw.1 issue the recommendation not later than ten working days following conclusion of aU testimony nod hearings. (c) Oed.donal criteria The hearing exwniner shan use the following criteria in reviewing the preJimimuy PRD and may recommend approva1 of the preliminary PRD to dIe city council if: . (1) It is consistcnt with the comprehensive plan; (2) It is con!Oistent with all applicable provisions of this chnpler. including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan: (3) It is con.'iistcl1t with public health, safety, and wclfarc~ (4) Il is consistent with design criteria contained in this article; and (5) II is consistent with the developlœDt standards listed in sections 22-_. Cd) COlJd;I;UfU and "srrictions. The heating examiner shall include in the writ(cn recommendations any \:onditions and restrictions that the examiner determines are rea!ionably necessary to eliminate or minimize any undesirable effects of granting the ap(J(iention. (0) Conttmts. The hearing examiner shan include the following in the wrinen recommendation to the citY council: (1) A statement of facts pre.~cntcd to the hearing examiner that supports his or her recommendation, including any conditions and restrictions dlat are recommended. (2) A statement of the hearing examiner's conclusions based on those fact'i. (3) A statement of criteria used by the bearing examiner in making the recommendation. (4) The date of issuance of the recommendation. (f) Disrriburion of written Tt!conurtendafion. The director of community development services shan distribute copies of the recommendation of the he:mng examiner as follows: (1) Within two working days after the hearing examiner's written recommendation is issued a copy will be scnt to the applic.1J1t, each person who submitted wrincn or oral teslimony to the. hearing examiner, and each person who specifically requested ii, (2) Prior to the public meeting where city council considers the hearing examiner's recommendation. a copy will be scnt to each member of the city 'council. The director of community development services shall include a draft re.'!olulÏon that embodies the hearing examiner's recommendation wid1 a copy of the recommendation. Sec. 20-321 Prellminary PRD - City council review. action, (n) Following receipt of the final rcpon and recommendations of the hearing examiner, a date shall be sot for a public meeting before the city council, (b) The c:ily council review of the preJiminnry PRD application shall be limited to the record of the hearing before the hearing cxaminccand'the hearing exnminor's wriucn rcpon and for compliance with review crilcrÎa set forth in section 20-320. (c) After considering the recommendations of the bcarlng examiner, the city council ma)' adopt or reject the hearing examiner's recommendations based on the record established at the public hearing. If, after considering the mancc at a public meeting, the city council deems a change in the hearing examiner's recommendation approving Or disapproving the preliminary PRD is ncce.CLWY, the city council shall adopt its own recommendations and approve Or disapprove (he prc1iminary PRD, 3/26/97 7 .80 'd GG:Ol nHl L6-6G-^ij~ , . [9HB ON DII:U] H:OT ..... 'U LB/BZ/SO '&OJ' - . ,.......... ...........'....., ...... """y"""" ..,,¿ (d) As p:1Tt or the final review, the city council may require or approve n minor modification to the preliminary PRD if the city determines that the change will not increase any odvcrse impacts or undesirable effect:; uf the project and iliat the change does not significamly alter the projoct. Sec, 20-322 Prcliminary PRD . Notice of decision. (a) Gmeral. Following the rmal decision by the city council, the director of community development services shall prepare a notiee of the city's final decision on the application. (b) (}isrribu.tiolL Within ten wooong days after the city council'!; decision is made, the dircc[or of community development services shall distribute a Cl1Py of the notice or the final decision as follows: (l) A copy will be 5ent to the applicant; (2) A copy will be sent to any person who submitted wriuen or oral comments to the hearing examiner, and (3) A copy will be sent to each person who ha.o; specifically requested it. See:. 20-323 Preliminary PRD . Judicial review, The action or the city in granting or denying an application under this anicl~ may be reviewed pursuant to the :>landard... !\et forth in RCW 36,7OC.I30 in the King County Jlupcrior court. The land use petition must be filed within 21 calendllI" days after tl1e fma1land use decision of the city. Preliminary PRD - Duration of approval. (¡¡) Approval or the preliminary PRD by the city council sho.ll include aU conditions. restrictions. and other requirements adopted by the council as part of approval. City council approval of a preliminary PRD shan not conJltitutc approval for land clearing or grading. vegetation rcmoval. or any other activities which olherwise require permits from the city. (b) Prior to con:,lruction of improvements pursuant to preliminary PRD approval. engineering drawings for public improvements shall be submitted for review and . Kppruvul lO the department of public works and tl1e Lakehaven Utility District OT Ci[y of Tacoma public utilities department. No constrUction or site work shall be perfonllcd unm final approval of all utility plans. including storm drainage. the payment of all pertinent Sec. 20-324 fees. and the submittal of performance and maintennnce securities as may be required. (c) Preliminary PRD approval shall expire 24 month.c¡ from the date of city council approval unless substantial progress has been made toward completion of the entire PRD, or tbe initial phase of the PRD. if the preliminary approval included phasing. In the event the applicant has not ronde substantial progress toWàrd completion of the ÞRD. the applicant may request an extension from the planning director. The reque.o;t for exten.'iÍon must be submiucd to the department of community development services atlca.st 30 days prior to the expiration date of the preliminary PRD. (d) In considering whe~er to grant the exren.o¡ion. the planning director shall consider whclher conditions in the vicinity of the PRD have changed to a sufficient degree since inilial approval to warrant rcconsidOOilÏon of the preliminary PRD. If the planning director deems such reconsider-d.tion is warranted. a public hearing shall be !lcheduled and advertised in accordance with procedures for a p~liminary PRD. Sec. 20-325 Final PRD - Form and content. (a) 111e applicant shall file with the department of eonununity development services a final PRO plan containing in a detailed form the information required in for the pre1iminary PRD application. (b) The final PRD plan mWit present all of the information required for the preliminary PRD in a finalized. detailed fom1. This includc.o; siLc plans sl.Ifficlent for recording and engineering drawings. All schemåtic plans pre.o;ented in lhe preliminary PRO plan stage must be prc.o;cnlcd in their detailed form. Any items not submitted during tbe preliminary PRD stage rou.o¡t be reviewed, and any final platS and public dedication documents shaU' also be submiUed at [his time. (c) For PRDs which arc phasèd, a phasing plan Mall be required. The phasing p1an ¡¡han de.,t¡cribc the general boundarie.4I of each phase and the expected date at which a detailed site plan will be submitted for each phase. PROVIDED. however, no project to be developed in phases may exceed five years from the time the phasing plan is submitted. See:. 20.326 Final PRD . Administrative review, The applicant(s) shall submit the final develapmcnL plan to the director of community deve1opmcnt services for review. If tl1e opplication meeLo¡ the minimum requirements as set forth in lhis chaplcr and is in subsCAntial compliance with the approved preliminary 3/26/97 8 60 'd 22:01 nHl L6-62-ABU . . (SU6 ON DI/UJ U:OI 0 "'-II .. L616Z1S0 . -._.~- _.~-._.--- --.~'~r"'~'" ---0-'- PRO development plan. it shall be submiuecJ to the hearing examiner. The final PRD development plan shall he deellloo sufficiently eon.o;istent with the preliminary PRO development plan, PROVIDED, n,odification by the applicant docs not involve a change of one or more of the: following: (a) Violate any provisions of this chapter, . (b) Vary the lot area requirements by more than five percent; (c) Invo1vc a rcducdon of more than five percent of the area reserved for upon space; (d) Increase the total ground area covered by buildings by more (han two percent; (f) Tncreu.'lIc density or number of dwelling unit.o; by mOre than five percent; and (g) Change in points of vehicular and/or pedestrian access. Sec. 20-327 Final PRD . Hearing examiner review. (a) The hearing examiner, upon receiving the final PRO development plan and rccommcndnùons from the director of community dcvcJopmcnt services, shan examine such plan and determine whether it conforms to the approved preliminary PRD development plan. If there i.' any significant discrepancy, tbe planning commi!lsion RIa)' permit the applicant to revise the plan and resubmit it as a final development plan within 90 dnys; (h) If the hearing examiner finds that the final PRD development plan substanûal1y conforms to the approved preliminary PRD development plan, the ~ -,fPlftftftiftg çgAawì;ltinn shall makc written findings and , cunclu.'Iions rct:ommending approval to the city council, If the .,&anaiAg r;:gmminigR docs not recommend approval or a final development plan, its speçific reasons for dis.'pproval !lhall be stated in writing and 11\c1de part óf thc public record as well as preSented to the 8¡'Ipticant: (c) The hearing examiner shaU make a re<;~mcndaùon on the final development plan within --I.L.l- calendar days after the official date it has received the plnn from (he director of community development services. Sec. 20.328 FInal rRD - City councO action. Following formo.l acceptance, the final PRD development plan shall be transmitlC:d to the city council for final approval. modification or rejection, Approvals subject to modifications or contlilionll shall be agreed to in writing by the applicant before fonnal acceptance. " Sec. 20-329 Final PRD . Appcal of city council decision. TIlc deçision approyjng or disapproving any final PRD shall be reviewable pur-...uant to the standards set forth in RCW 36.21c.130 before the King County superior court. Slanding to bring the aclion is limited to the following parties: (1) The applicant or owner of the property on which the PRD is proposed; (2) Any property owner wilhin 300 fccr of the proposal~ and (3) Any property owner who deems him or herself aggñevcd dtcrc:by and who wiU suffer direct and substantial impacu from the proposed PRD. See. 20-330 Final PRD - A mcndlnents. (8) Minor changes of lollincs or the combination of lots if no nc.w lots arc created, or minor changes in location, siting and height of buildings and s[ructurc!; may be authorized by the director of community development services if required by engineering or other circumstances not fore.o;een at the time the final pfU) was approved. No change authori7.cd by lhis subsection may cause any of the following: (I) A change in the use or ch3I"actCr of the development; (2) An ißcrcasc in the overall coveroge of slTUelurcs; (3) An increase in dlC intensity of use; (4) An increase in the number of acce.c;s pointo; and problems of traffic circulõltÎon, (5) An inCRase in the problems of public utilities; (6) A reduetion in approved open space: (7) A TCcluclion of oft'-str~t parking and loading space; and (8) A reduction in required pavement widLhs. (b) AU other changes in use or rearrangement of lots, blocks and building tracts, or any changes in the provision of common opeO space and changes other (han listed in subsection (a) of this section, must be made through a new preliminary and final PRO, 3/26/97 9 01 'd EG:Ol nHl L6-6G-^ij~ . . (9Lt6 ON DII:U] 1Z:01 r ~ L6/6Z/£O ,,)IUJJ }I - r MUUICU u.c.....c,..,u. VC pc.vl"""'" "".s~' Sec. 20-331 Building permit iss\lance. After neccssary actions by the city eouncU. such a~ rccunling site plans and rIals. building permits may be is$\led and construction may begin. Construction start aud completion limits, If no construction has begun in the PRD within 24 months from the approval of thc final PRD and recording of the documents, the approval shall lapse ond be of no further effect except that the city council, ba.'Icd on the recommendation of the director of community development services, upon showing of good cause by the applicant, may extend for two periods of 12 months each the Úme for beginning consU1.lcliol'l. RcquestS for extensions mu.~ be filed with the director of community development at least thirty days prior to the expiration of the pcnnit approval. Upon the cxpiration of such an çxtcnsìon(s), the linnl PRO shall become null and void. and a new one shall be required for any PRO development on the subject property. Sec. 20-332 See. 20-334 PRO public services availability. (n) The purpose or this section is to a.uure thal PRD approval¡¡ arc nol granted unless such facilities as water lines. scwer lines and streets exist or arc immediaLcly planned in sufficient quantity to service the proposcd new development. PRO projects shall be 50 Inc,llccJ with respect to ¡¡choot!, parks, playgrounds uncI other public facilities that they shall have access in the :mmc degree as would development in a form generally penniued in lbe area; PROVIDED, that a PRD may be approved if, alternatively: (I) TIle developers will provide pñvalc utilities, facilities or services ¡¡pproved by lhe public agencies which would normally provide such ulilitie~. facilitie.~ or SCNiccs as substituting on nn equivalent basis and assure their satisfactory continuing operation and maintenance pcnnanently or until equivalent public utilities. facilities or services are avaihiblc, or (2) The developers will make provision. acceptable to the city. for ofTsctting any added net public cost or early commitment of public funds neccssitated by such development, or (3) The cily is able to make such detcnninations through CXpCl1S acceptable to it and al the cost of the: dcvdopers. considering thc difference in anticipatcd public installation, operation and maintenance costq. and the difference in anticipated public revenue. (b) PRO projects shaH he so located willi respect to major streelc¡ and highways or other transportation facilities that they shall provide direct access to such facilities without creating [raffle along minor streets in re.oridential neighborhoods outside the PRD. Major and minor SlreC[S arc defined in the section 22-1525. < See. 20-335 Design criteria. Gencndly. (8) The design criteria established wilhin this article shall be used a.c; a guide for an applicant to follow in deve1oping a preliminary and final PRO deve1oprœnt plan. (b) These criteria shan also be u.'iCcJ as thc basis for recommendation and deci¡:ions regarding density int:reases within a PRO. Design criteria. Required open space. (a) For the purpose of this article. open space shan be described in the following categories: See. 20-336 (1) Usable open spaa. Arens which have appropriate topugraphy, soils, drainage and size to be considered for development as active recreation areas. (2) ConservaTion open spact:. Areas containing special natural or physical amenities or environmentntIy sensitive fealures. the conservation of which would benefit ;'iuITounding properties or the community a.'I a whole. Such areas may include. but lU'e not limited to, stands of large trCCs. view corridors or view points. crecks and Slr'Cams, wetlands and marshes, ponds and lake.... or areas of historical or archaeological importance. Conservation open space nnd usable open space may be, bUI are not always, mutually inclusive. (3) Buffer open !¡pace. Areas which are primarily intended to provide separation bclween properties or between propcrtic:l and streetS. Buffer open space may. but dues nol always. contain usable open space or conservation open space. (4) Severely collsrrained open spact!. Area.'i noL included in any of the above categories which. due to physical characteri!itics. arc impractical or unsafe for development. Sueh areas may 3/26/97 10 11 'd VG:OI nHl L6-6G-AijW [SH6 ON nI/Y~] 1Z : 01 11H.-. "" t6/6Z/S0 include but arc not limited 10 srocp rock c!icnrptncntS or areas of unstable soils- (b) All PROs shnll be required to providc open splIce in the ntnoulU of 15 percent of the gross land area of the PRO site. (C) Any combination of open space types may be u!lCd 10 accompli...h the tolal minimum area required to be TCSCrved as follows: Open ,:pace caEegory Pcrccnt of gross land area Usable 10% minimum Con¡¡crv-.ltion No maximum oc minimum Durrer 2% maximum Constrained 2% maximum See. 20-337 Design criteria. Single-family PRDs. (a) loOt sk~ and setback.t T~duct;on. A maximum reduction of 2S percent for minimum lot sizc and rec¡uirtd setbacks for PRDs located in single-family (RS) residential zones may be pcrmitlCÙ according to the following parrinl reductions for de.'lignatcd design criteria. Thc reductions arc addiüve, but in no case may they exceed 25 percent in total. The exact amount of each partial reduction is dctonnincd by the review authority., (1) A maximum reduction of 6 percent may be grunted if at lca.~l 25 percent of the gross land area of the PRD site is reserved 3." open !.-pacc pursuant to the guidelines set fonh in section 20-336(c). An additional reduction of 3 percent (9 percent cumulative) may be gnmtcd if at least 35 porœnt is reserved as open space; (2) A muimum reduction of 7 percent may be gronted if ndvantagc is taken or enhancement is rn:hieved of unu.c:ual or significant site fcaturc... such I1S views. watercourses, wetlands or other natural cbanu:tcristies; (3) ^ maximum reduction of 4 pcn:cnt ma~ be granted by the u!le of e'ti!iting land.'\caping or innovative hmdscaping methods for !\trceucapc5, opcn spaces, pluas or recreational areas; and (4) A maximum reduction of S percent may be grantcd by the Inclusion of featUres such ns variation in building setbacks. harmonious use of materials, clustering of buildings enörgy-efficient siting. or Sec, 20-338 Design criteria - Multi-fnmily PRDs. ;)0 a De ,it increase. A density increase o@ erccnt greal~r; than thnt permitted by the underlymg 7.on rriii.Y be aQowcd for PRDs located in multi- family (RM) residential zones according to the fo1towing partial density increases for designated design criteria. The 4ensity in e add" , ut -;¡o in no case may they exceed 30 percent i total. The exact amount of each parllR nSJty increase is determined by Ihe review authority. (1) A maximum increase or 6 percent may be granted if at least 25 ¡x.."rccnt of the gross land area of tho PRD site is rcscrvt.-d as open ~"pt\ce puTh"Uant to the guidelines set forth in secdon 2o-336(c). An additional reduction of 3 percent (9 percent cumulative) may bG grantcd if at lcast 35 percent is reserved ns open space; (2) A maximum increase of 7 percent may be 1Iranted if advantage is lakeD or enhancemont is achieved of unusual or significant site featuTe.~ such as views, watercourses, wetlands or other natural characteristics: (3) A maximum increasc of 4 percent may be gnmLcd by the use of existing landscaping Or innovative land.c;c¡¡ping method.<; for sueetscapes. open spnces, plaz.1s or recre.uionnl areas; (4) A maximum increa.o¡e of 5 percent may be granted by the inclusion of features such as vllriation in building setbacks, hannonious USe of materials, clustering of buildings or encrgy-cfficient siting; and (5) A maximum incrc.n....e of 5 percent may be. gr.mtcd if a variety of housing types is providcd. (b) R~quirtd p~rimeter buffer lOne. A minimum 30 foot buffer zone must be provided for nny PRD of multifnmily struc:tures in the RM t11at is adjacent to a RS or SE zoning district. The buffer zone mu¡¡t he kept free of buildings or structures and must bc landscaped, scrccnéd or protected by natural features so that adverse effects on surrounding areas are minimized. Sec, 20-339 Design criteria - Streets, (8) Right-of-way width and Slreet roadway widlhs may be reduced by the public works director upon a " 3/26/97 1J GI'd SG:OI nHl L6-6G-^~~ [RH6 ON DI/Y~J IZ:01 fiRl J/6~/~O . ""-JJ ""'-JO . _.~.-- -.-.--...-- -.-.-.r"..'- '--0----'-- finding that the plan for the PRD pro",id~s for the scparution of vehicular :1nd pedestrian circulation patterns nnd provides for adequate off-street parking facilities. 3/26/97 /2 ...., . 1 SG:Ol nHl L6-6G-^~U MEETING DATE: January 6, 1998 ITEM# Jill .................. ........................................................................................................................................................"..........""""""""""""""""' ....................."...... CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM '" §Y..~ .~~ ç.! .;. ....ç,!!y'.. ç.~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~. ..ç. ~.~ .~.~.~ ~ .~..Ap. P. ~.~.!1..!!!!~!! !~............. .... ........................ ........." ............... ............. CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT: _CONSENT _ORDINANCE X BUSINESS HEARING FYI RESOLUTION _STAFF REPORT - PROCLAMA TION _STUDY SESSION OTHER Amount Budgeted: $ Expenditure Amt: $ Contingency Reqd: $ """"""""""""",,"""""""."""""""""""""""""""""""""'"......................................................................................"....................................................."..... ATTACHMENTS: None """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"................................................................,.........................................."...................................... SUMMARYfBACKGROUND: Pursuant to Federal Way City Council Rules of Procedure, Section 21, the Mayor will make committee assignments each January, taking into consideration the interests and requests of individual Councilmemben, with memben serving one year terms. Membenhip of each committee will consist of three members. Committee chairs may serve for no more than two consecutive yean unless rules are suspended for that purpose. The following committees have been established: FinancelEconomic Development, Land Useffransportation, Public Safety/ Human Services, ParkslRecreation and Committee of Whole (regional issues). .............................,......................................................................................."................................................................................. .....,....................."............... CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: n/a ....................................................................................,................................................................."................................................ ......................................."... CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: n/a ...................................................................................."............................................................................................................"..... ...........................".............. APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ¥r'" B~}' ~ . (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CI1Y CLERK'S OFFICE) COUNCIL ACTION: _APPROVED _DENIED _TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION COUNCIL BILL # 1st Reading Enactment Reading ORDINANCE # RESOLUTION #