Council PKT 07-07-1998 Special/Regular
~ '.
I
City of Federal Way
City Council Meeting
AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBERS
Ron Gintz, Mayor
Jeanne Burbidge Linda Kachmar
Jack Dovey Michael Park
Mary Gates Phil Watkins
....
CITY MANAGER
Kenneth E. Nyberg
Office of the City Clerk
.Iuly 7, 1998
.
-"
I.
II.
III.
I. ..
II.
III.
IV.
v,
I
AGENDA
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
July 7, 1998
(www.ci.federal-way. wa. us)
*****
CALL MEETING TO ORDER.
DIVERSITY COMMISSION & ETHICS BOARD INTERVIEWS
ADJOURN
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRESENTATIONS
a.
b.
Recreation & Parks Month/Proclamation
Community Policing Partnership A ward
CITIZEN COMMENT
PLEASE COMPLETE THE PINK SUP & PRESENT TO THE DEPUTY CLERK PRIOR TO SPEAKING.
Citizens may address City Council at this time. When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the
podium, adjust the microphone to proper height, and state your 1Ulme and address for the record. PLEASE
LIMIT YOUR REMARKS TO THREE f3) MINUTES. The Mayor may interrupt citizen comments that
continue too long, relate negatively to other individuals, or are otherwise i1UlpproprioJe.
CONSENT AGENDA
(Items listed below have been previously reviewed by a Council Committee of three members and brought before
full Council for approval; all items will be enacted by one motion; individual items may be removed by a
Councilmember for separate discussion and subsequent motion.)
a.
b.
Minutes/June 16, 1998 Regular Meeting
Voucher/July 7, 1998
over please. . .
.
, I
.II8i.
~.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
VI.
...
VII.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
VIII.
IX.
x.
Monthly Financial Rq)Ort/~ 1998
Human Services Appointment
Militat:)' Rd So at Star T .a1ce Rd Siina1i7.ation PrQjectll00% Desi¡n Approval &
Authorization to Bid
So 304th St & Militu:y Rd Street & Traffic Si¡nal ImprovemC;llt81100% Desi¡n
Approval & Authorization to Bid
SW 312th St & 14th Ave SW Pedestrian Wal~y/l00% Desi¡n Approval &
Authorization to Bid
Celebration Park F1~ Pole .
National Maintenance Coq>oration Contmct Amendment
Steel T ..a1ce Park/FoliC<)' on Park Use
Use of Rq>lacement Reserves Fund
PUBLIC HEARING
1999-2004 Tran$pOrtation-Arterial Street Improvement Pro¡ram
Staff Report
Citizen Comment
City Council Deliberation
Resolution/Adopting 1999-2004 TIP
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Cancellation of Au¡ust 18, 1998 R~u1ar Meeting
Diversity Commission Appointments
Ethics Board Appointments
SeaTac Phase I (ßelmo~)/ Authority to Award Construction Contract
Re¡ional Governance & Finance
INTRODUCTION ORDINANCE
Council Bill #197/Establishment of Public Safety Dq>artment Code Amendment
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS REGARDING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT. (AMENDING
ORDINANCE 95-252)
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
....
..
I
XI.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
a.
b.
Property ACQ)Iisition/Pursuant to RCW 42.30. 110(1)(b)
Personnel/Pursuant to RCW 42.30.11O(1)(~)
XII.
ADJOURNMENT
..,
.. THE COUNCIL MAY ADD AND TAKE ACTION ON OTHER ITEMS NOT USTED ON THE AGENDA ..
MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998
ITEM# ..:;;¡z- VL )
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'".........................................................................",..........................................................................".....
....
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
.........................................................................................."..................................................................................,............"""""""""""""
""""""""""""""""'"
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
...x.CONSENT
_ORDINANCE
_BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
_RESOLUTION
_STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMATION
_STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
................................................................."...............................................................................................".....................................
.........................,............,........
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes - June 16, 1998 Regular Meeting
....................................................................................."...........................................................................".....................................
............................................."
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Written minutes required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW)
"""""""""",""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'."""'.""'""""'."""""""""."."""'."".""""'."""""'.""'.""'.""""'"".""".""'."""""""""""""""""""""""
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes as presented.
.....................................................,...................................................,...............................................................,.............................
...............,.........................,.......
~: .~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ : . ~~ ~~: ~~ ~~~.~~t~~~~~~~s~~t~~ AQ ¡ ~~~,..
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNC(fv1}
PACKET: t
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CIlY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED
DENIED
- TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
I:\agenda. bil
DRAFT
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers - City Hall
Regular Meeting
June 16, 1998 - 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
I.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Ron Gintz opened the regular meeting of the Federal Way City Council at 7:05 p.m., in
Council Chambers, City Hall, Federal Way, Washington.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Ron Gintz, Deputy Mayor Michael Park, Councilmembers
Jeanne Burbidge, Jack Dovey, Linda Kochmar and Phil Watkins.
City Staff present: City Manager Kenneth E. Nyberg, Deputy City Manager Philip Keightley, City
Attorney Londi Lindell, City Clerk Chris Green and Deputy City Clerk Bob Baker.
Mayor Gintz noted Councilmember Gates had a family emergency and may not be in attendance.
Councilmember Watkins MOVED TO ADD A COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEM AFTER THE
PUBLIC HEARING, (ITEM VII) - A RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON
JULY 7, 1998, FOR ADOPTION OF EXTENDED AND REVISED SIX-YEAR
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND ARTERIAL STREET
IMPROVEMENTS; secon~ by Councilmember Dovey. The motion carried as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Kochmar
Watkins
yes
excused
yes
yes
Dovey
Gintz
Park
yes
yes
yes
II.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Girl Scout Troop #1850 led the flag salute.
III.
PRESENTATION
a.
"Silent Witness National Initiative" Proclamation
The proclamation was read by Councilmember Burbidge. The Silent Witness National Initiative
was established to promote peace, healing and responsibility in adult relationships in order to
eliminate domestic murders in the United States by the year 2010. The goals have been
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
June 16, 1998 - Page 2
established to provide Silent Witness traveling exhibits in every state, to honor victims, document
their murders and tell their stories across the country. The Council proclaimed the Week of June
15-19, 1998, as part of "Silent Witness National Initiative Month" and urged all citizens to raise
awareness and increase involvement in an effort to eliminate domestic violence within our
community.
b.
Public Safety Department Commendation
Councilmember Dovey read the Certificate of Commendation prepared for the employees of the
Public Safety Department and noted the sharp reduction in index crimes. He also stated Federal
Way had the largest decrease in violent and family crimes, in the State of Washington, last year.
Deputy Chief Tom Chaney accepted the Certificate and thanked the Council for their support.
Further, City Manager Nyberg presented a Certificate of Commendation on behalf of the City
Manager's Office, commending the Department for their efforts and progress.
c.
Economic Development Update
Debra Coates reported we are rapidly closing on the first six months of this project and stated
progress is being made in all target areas, including some unexpected benefits that are a bonus to
the program.
She and Ed Swan have toured and identified the specific projects for neighborhood grants and she
is working toward document submission.
Debra is currently working with about 70 sign incentive program applicants. She is making direct
contact with those businesses whose removal of existing pole signage would make the greatest
impact to encourage participation in the program.
She has dealt and continues to deal with the areas ofRTA, distinct districts as well as marketing
and economic development.
She thanked the Council, City staff, and her committee for the support and hard work on the first
six months of this program. She stated it is a partnership in every sense of the word.
IV.
CITIZEN COMMENT
Gitte Saravanda thanked the Council and City stafffor their work in the analysis for the need of
speed humps and spoke in favor of same. The humps will slow traffic and make the streets safer.
"
CITY COUNCn. REGULAR MEETING
June 16, 1998 - Page 3
Bob Dahl spoke in opposition to speed humps on 323rd, 20th and "wherever else they are
planned." He's been here before and said his presence is nothing new. He did, however, submit a
petition back in March with over 195 signatures to which he has never received a response.
Doreen Bodey, speaking from the audience, was here with her neighbors from the SW 338th area,
and spoke in favor of the speed humps.
Dale Spratt, spoke in opposition to the speed humps. He acknowledges a speeding problem in
Federal Way and also stated, the speed humps won't "fix" the problem. He doesn't know the
answer, but stated more enforcement is one solution to the problem.
Lindsay Kanesta spoke in favor of the speed humps and is happy to see action on the agenda
items this evening.
Mary LeProwse spoke in opposition to speed humps; especially with regard to those on SW 323rd
and 30th Avenue. Only one hump meets the criteria.
Jane Henderson spoke on behalf of the residents ofSW 323rd and noted they have satisfied criteria
for speed humps in that area and is very much in support of same.
Mayor Gintz noted Council does not usually respond during citizen comment; however, he wants
Consent Agenda Items ( c) and (d) pulled for Council to respond to the citizens who spoke this
evening, so they are not met with silence.
V.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
1.
J.
k.
1.
m.
n.
CONSENT AGENDA
Minutes/June 2. 1998 Regular Meeting
1998 Diversity Commission Work Plan
SW 323rd Speed Humps
30th Ave. SW Speed Humps
Barry's Trucking Contract Amendment
Amaya Electric Contract Amendment
Celebration Park Athletic Field Lights
Star Lake Rd Conveyance Improvements/30% Design Approval
So. 356th Regional Storm Water Control Facility/Final Acceptance
SeaTac Phase I (BelmorV Authority to Award Bid
Crown Point Storm Sewer Repair/30% Design Approval
Vacuum/Jet Rodding Services/Authority to Award Bid
SW 340th Regional Storm Water Control Facility/Authority to Award Bid
Joe's Creek Water Ouality Monitoring Station/l00% Desi~n & Authority to Bid
"
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
June 16, 1998 - Page 4
Mayor Gintz pulled items C & D
Councilmember Watkins pulled item G
Councilmember Dovey MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A, B, E, F, H,
I, J, K, L, M & N; second by Deputy Mayor Park. The motion carried as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Kochmar
Watkins
yes
excused
yes
yes
Dovey
Gintz
Park
yes
yes
yes
Items C & D: SW 323rd Speed Humps & 30th Ave. SW Speed Humps
These items were pulled for discussion. Councilmember Dovey addressed these issues as they
emerged from his committee. Other Councilmembers then spoke in response to citizen comments
received this evening. Most members agreed speed humps may not be the only solution to the
problems at hand; however, they are the best solution at this time.
Mayor Dovey MOVED APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS C & D; second by
Deputy Mayor Park. The motion carried as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Kochmar
Watkins
yes
excused
yes
yes
Dovey
Gintz
Park
Item G:
Celebration Park Athletic Field Lights
yes
yes
yes
Councilmember Watkins pulled this item for clarification. Councilmember Dovey MOVED
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM G; second by Councilmember Burbidge. The
motion carried as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Kochmar
Watkins
VI.
yes
excused
no
no
Dovey
Gintz
Park
PUBLIC HEARING
yes
yes
yes
1999-2000 Preliminary Biennial Budget Hearing for Citizen Suggestions
CI'lY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
June 16, 1998 - Page 5
Mayor Gintz opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
Citizen Comment was received trom Mike Shields, Executive Director of the Tacoma-Pierce
County Sports Commission. Mr. Shields is interested in creating a relationship between the City
of Federal Way and the Sports Commission. Tonight's proposal details that relationship trom his
perspective. Three points he wanted to make are 1.) He is currently servicing events in Federal
Way. 2.) The business of attracting amateur athletic events is becoming very competitive.
Seattle, Tacoma, and Spokane all have sports commissions trying to attract business on a daily
basis; and, 3.) His request for funding is "incredibly reasonable."
He would like to speak to the Council at a later date. He noted his appreciation for their time and
consideration.
There was a very brief question and answer period between Council and staff regarding this issue.
Peter Townsend spoke in opposition to discontinuation of funding the ACC $100,000.00
contribution for the 1999 budget. He stated it would be a disaster to stop that payment. By
spending $100,000.00 to fight the 3rd Runway, the City Council would, abandon all the citizens
who have fought the arrogance and bad faith tactics of the Port of Seattle and would send a
terrible message to the school district, which will be asked to join with others in a lawsuit against
the Port for pollution damage to Federal Way schools in the North end of town. He concluded by
saying the third runway fight is too important to abandon now. He asked the Council to maintain
the $100,000.00 annual contribution to the Airport Communities Coalition.
"
AI Ferney, President, Regional Commission on Airport Affairs, which operates out of the City of
Normandy Park, stated he maintains a network of citizens interested in the airport issue on a
region-wide basis. He provided two hand-outs which shows some of the iiûormation they feel is
pertinent to the decision Council may weigh in terms of the budget.
Barbara Reid, representing the Parks & Recreation Commission, wanted to discuss the 1999-2000
budget because "we're operating with pretty thin dollars" right now for the parks. Wedgewood
Park and the Skate Park must be finished and developed for the young people in Federal Way.
She is also concerned the staffis "thin." We are understaffed. She needs help. The commission
needs help.
H. David Kaplan echoed Barbara's comments and added the City must preserve and maintain City
assets. Our parks are a large part of our assets. There is a gap between the needs of maintenance
and the actual amount of maintenance which can actually be done. The gap is widening and we
are deteriorating an asset. He stated it has been proved that if the parks are maintained and ready
for use by students, there is a general reduction in crime.
Councilmember Gates arrived at 8:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
June 16, 1998 - Page 6
Councilmember Watkins made a request of staff to provide an accounting for the beginning
balance of the City Manager's Contingency Fund, as part of the budgeting process and as a
separate document, including expenditures and encumbrances, fÌ"om January 1, 1998.
Mayor Gintz closed the public hearing at 8:18 p.m.
VII.
COUNCIL BUSINESS (Added Item)
Setting a Public Hearing - Six Year T. 1. P. & Arterial Street Improvement
PlanlResolution APPROVED RESOLUTION 98-272
Councilmember Watkins MOVED APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION AS PROPOSED;
second by Councilmember Gates. The motion carried as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Kochmar
Watkins
yes
yes
yes
yes
Dovey
Gintz
Park
yes
yes
yes
VIII.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
The City/Lakehaven Liaison Committee Regular meeting is set for July 1, 1998, at 7:30 a.m.
at Lakehaven.
The City/School Liaison Committee Regular meeting is set for June 24, 1998, at 7:30 a.m., at
City Hall
Congratulations are in order for Mr. Derek Matheson. He has been appointed as Assistant to the
City Manager. His new duties began today. Derek will work under the direction of the City
Manager and Deputy City Manager.
Using photographs in connection with the overhead projector, PRCS Director Jennifer Schroder
made a presentation on the continued progress of the Knutzen Family Theatre. This project is
very much on schedule.
Also using photographs, PRCS Deputy Director Dave Wilbrecht made a presentation on the
progress of Celebration Park. This project is also on schedule.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
June 16, 1998 - Page 7
IX.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Dovey toured Celebration Park this week with Jenny Schroder and Dave
Wilbrecht. He also attended two field dedications this weekend - Lake Grove Elementary and
Mark Twain Elementary. The next Parks & Recreation Committee meeting is June 22, 1998.
Councilmember Watkins noted the next Land Use/Transportation Committee meeting will be July
6, 1998.
Councilmember Burbidge attended the "Moving King County 2000" meeting addressing potential
funding sources for transportation needs. Other meetings are to follow. She also toured the
Knutson Family Theatre last week with the Arts Commission members.
Councilmember Gates noted the next FEDRAC Committee meeting is June 23, 1998, at 12:00
p.m. RTA had several large milestone achieved recently. The Commuter Rail received the "go-
ahead" and Notice to Proceed for all of its environmental work. The RTA Board awarded a
contract for train cars so there will be equipment for people to ride on at the end of 1999. There
was also a watershed meeting in the fair-integration area trying to work with five agencies to
work together to integrate their fair structures, starting when the commuter rail and regional
buses come on in 1999. All five agencies came to agreement, and a phased-in approach was
agreed upon.
Councilmember Kochmar attended a Suburban Cities Association meeting recently, in Redmond.
She gave some information relative to current and future court costs. She then thanked Public
Works Director Cary Roe for his recent report on refuse.
Deputy Mayor Park made no report.
Mayor Gintz made no report and recessed the regular meeting at 8:46 p.m. for Council to
convene executive session.
X.
EXECUTIVE SESSI ON
At 9: 15 p.m., Deputy City Manager Keightley announced another: 10 minutes are necessary.
At 9:20 p.m., Deputy City Manager Keightley announced another: 15 minutes are necessary.
At 9:40 p.m., Mayor Gintz reconvened the regular meeting.
As part of the traffic improvements being as a result of the 1995 voter-approved bond issue,
Councilmember Watkins MOVED APPROV AI.. TO DIRECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO CLOSE THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY REQUIRED
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
June 16,1998 - Page 8
BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE STREET WIDENING PROJECT AT SO.
312m STREET, EAST OF HIGHWAY 99, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF A CERTAIN
REAL ESTATE AND EASEMENT PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 8,
1998, BETWEEN THE CITY, AS PURCHASER, AND WAL-MART REAL ESTATE
BUSINESS TRUST, AS SELLER, COVERING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
THE SW CORNER OF SO. 312m STREET AND 20m AVE SOUTH, FEDERAL WAY,
WASmNGTON, FOR A PURCHASE PRICE OF $84,000.00; second by Councilmember
Burbidge. The motion carried as follows:
Burbidge
Gates
Kochmar
Watkins
yes
yes
yes
yes
Dovey
Gintz
Park
yes
yes
yes
XI.
ADJOURNMENT
Having no other business to come before the Council, Mayor Gintz adjourned the meeting at
9:43 p.m.
Robert H. Baker
Deputy City Clerk
...M. ~ ~.!!N9...;Q.~~: J~ ~.Y. ..z L!~~~..................................................._..!~.M:~
~C&-)
'.."..'..""""'.""""'...
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: VOUCHER
"""""""" ..................................................................,.............................................................................,.............................................
.................."..... ......". .,..
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
X CONSENT
ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMA TION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $ 2,501,265.51
Expenditure Amt: $ 2,501,265.51
Contingency Reqd:
..... ".. ....." '."'" "."".".' ........."... .............................., ................, """""""'" ........" ..... ..........,........ ............."........ ...,.... ........
......... ............, ............ "'.""."""""""
ATTACHMENTS: VOUCHER LIST
..............................................................,..........""""""""""."""""""""""'.""".""""""""".".....................................,.........................................""'.""""
"'"
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services
rendered, o.r the labor performed as described herein and that the claims are just and due obligations against the City of
..~~t~~.:.~~~.:~~~~~~.~~.:::.~:.~~::........................................
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
... ~ P. P. r. ~ ~~.. ~.~~~!1. ~ P...!~. ~ ~.~ ~E. P. ~ ~!1.. ~!..! ~..~ Ç..~.. ~ ~ :.~...... .. .............:..: '."""'.""" ....".. .'.""""'" .. .. '."'.'" .. .. ....,.. ...... ~:.......
..,.. .
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: ~ L~~~ .., ,-rc~~Q1 ð~ "
........... .... ...........-......... .................,... ..................,... .... ...... ... ....................................., "."""",.".""",."-"."",."",.""",.,.",,, .......
.~....... ......0{. t'...~......... ..,...
&
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED
DENIED
T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
ORDINANCE #
FIRST READING
ENACTMENT READ
RESOLUTION #
CCCOVER-5/24/94
4-I-L(
{:.
~
p
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
05/15/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140555
140559
140560
140561
140562
140563
140564
140565
140566
140567
140568
140569
140570
140577
140579
140583
140584
140585
140586
140587
140588
140589
140590
140591
140592
140593
VEND #
004363
000004
000007
000043
000051
000063
000075
000083
000089
000096
000101
000104
000106
000109
000112
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
SOREN NORTHWEST INC
GEO ENGINEERS
WESLEY MATTSON
JOHN GREEN
ED JACOBS
BOB HANSEN
THERESA HOPPE
MARY PALIGUTAN
JUNE CRAMER
JOHN E. NELSON
TERRY PIERCE
DEBORAH HOFFMAN
ASSOC OF WASHINGTON CITIES
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
CORPORATE EXPRESS
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
LOCK SHOP (DBA)
NEWS TRIBUNE
LAKE HAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
PETTY CASH
EDELINE M LOGREYRA
SELECT TRAVEL INC
ACTIVE SECURITY CONTROL (DBA)
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
AMOUNT
2,500.00
700.00
224.40
94.50
720.00
700.00
58.00
60.00
50.00
200.00
13 .12
54.28
2,568.50
6,035.69
394.23
25,905.53
108.75
2,049.54
27.95
614.25
1,216.50
29.06
227.50
747.00
64.89
453.12
.
PAGE
1
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
LOBBYIST/POLITICAL CONSULTANT
REFUND-CASH BOND:GEO ENGINEERS
REFUND-CASH BOND:WESLEY
REFUND-CASH BOND:JOHN GREEN
REFUND:PART REL/ADMIN DEPOSIT
REFUND-CASH BOND:BOB HANSEN
REFUND: REC CLASS REGISTRATION
REFUND: PICNIC RENTAL
REFUND: PICNIC DAMAGE DEPOSIT
ALLOWANCE:PROPERTY APPRAISAL
LAW-DIST COURT WITNESS FEE
DBC-CHECK FRM JOHN HATCHER FOR
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
CITY FACILITIES ELECTRIC & GAS
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT
CELLULAR PHONES AIR TIME
FACILITIES LOCK & KEYING SVCS
NEWSPAPER ADS & SUBSCRIPTIONS
CITY FACILITIES WATER & SEWER
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
AIRFARE FOR CITY BUSINESS TRVL
FACILITIES/FLEET LOCKSMITH SVC
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
.
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
-{::. OS/28/98
-:L OS/28/98
W OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140594
140595
140596
140597
140598
140599
140600
140601
140602
140603
140604
140605
140606
140607
140608
140609
140610
140611
140612
140613
140614
140615
140616
140617
140618
140619
VEND #
000117
000125
000142
000163
000168
000196
000201
000202
000217
000229
000315
000328
000333
000343
000345
000373
000414
000437
000438
000442
000504
000533
000541
000555
000560
000566
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
GFOA-GOV'T FINANCE OFFICERS
KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION
CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE TRAVEL
KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE INC
FORTE RENTALS INC
KINKO'S INC
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER COMMERCE
PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO
ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA)
BLT LOT SERVICE
ELEPHANT CAR WASH
DOUG FOX TRAVEL
KING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC
ASSOCIATED COURIERS INC
DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONES
CITY OF BELLEVUE POLICE DEPT
ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER
PUGET SOUND SPECIALTIES INC
WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS
CRISIS CLINIC
FEDERAL WAY PTSA COUNCIL
POPICH SIGN COMPANY
AMOUNT
55.95
102,782.49
1,126.72
35,143.19
1,188.00
995.85
301.76
286.70
5.75
6,250.00
314.94
4,342.68
494.13
642.25
223.00
223.17
4,791.47
23.60
94.81
200.00
25.37
803.46
342.79
32.99
1,237.00
40.18
PAGE
2
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
INVESTING PUBLIC FUNDS BOOK
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
CITY BUSINESS TRAVEL EXPENSES
DISTRICT COURT FILING FEES
NEWSPAPER LEGAL NOTICES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES
PRINTING SERVICES
CITY FACILITIES PHONE SERVICES
DOCUMENTS EXPRESS DELIVERY SVC
CHAMBER EXECUTIVE SALARY
PROPERTIES TITLE REPORTS
GASOLINE FOR CITY VEHICLES
CELEBRATN PK WATER TRUCK RENTL
POLICE VEHICLE CAR WASHES
AIRFARE:CITY BUSINESS TRAVEL
LEGAL BOOKS & SUPPLEMENTS
DUMAS BAY CENTRE CATERING SVCS
COURIER SERVICES
FOOD SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS
POLICE TRAINING CLASSES
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPLIES
PARKS GROUNDS MAINT SUPPLIES
MOWER/VEHICLE EQUIPMENT REPAIR
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
PRINTED SIGNS & NAME PLATES
-+:
:¡:
-f:
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140621
140622
140623
140624
140625
140626
140627
140628
140629
140630
140631
140632
140633
140634
140635
140636
140637
140638
140639
140640
140641
140642
140643
140644
140645
140646
VEND #
000570
000575
000597
000649
000654
000671
000721
000724
000754
000808
000873
000874
000920
000939
000951
000954
000991
001033
001052
001066
001124
001131
001146
001189
001241
001267
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
AMOUNT
EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA)
1,882.40
20.00
ATTORNEYS INFORMATION BUREAU
CAVANAUGHS INN AT THE PARK
582.92
APPLY-A-LINE INC
6,355.50
SEARS
352.86
H D FOWLER COMPANY
214.64
AMERICAN CONCRETE INC
215.03
HOMEGUARD SECURITY SERVICES
39.90
OXYGEN SALES & SERVICE INC
409.64
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
TARGET/DAYTON'S CHARGE ACCOUNT
287.79
18.74
MACHINERY COMPONENTS INC
14.07
PAPER DIRECT INC
155.65
CULLYSPRING WATER COMPANY INC
81.72
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
814.50
DNB MAILING SERVICES
519.24
CASCADE COFFEE INC
229.38
WA STATE-LICENSING/ENGINEERS
288.00
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
113.47
BIG WHEEL AUTO PARTS
9.38
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
454.78
EVERGREEN AUTO ELECTRIC INC
82.33
USSSA/SLO-PITCH SOFTBALL ASSOC
PETTY CASH
960.00
191.79
WEST COAST AWARDS
1,046.32
80.61
TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC
PAGE
3
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
VEHICLES MAINTENANCE & PARTS
LAW INFORMATION RETAINER/SVCS
LODGING FOR POLICE CONFERENCE
PW CHANNELIZATION MODIFICATION
PW/PARKS UNIFORM CLOTHING
PIPE & IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
CEMENT & SURFACING MATERIALS
FACILITIES ALARM MONITORING
WELDING/MISC SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLY
RECREATION EVENT SUPPLIES
MOWER REPAIR PARTS/SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARK FACILITIES BOTTLED WATER
RETAINAGE HELD FOR CONTRACTS
RECYCLING FLYERS MAILING SVCS
COFFEE SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS
ENGINEERING LICENSES RENEWAL
FLEET REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
FLEET REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CELLULAR PHONES SERVICES
FLEET REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
SOFTBALL TEAMS REGISTRATION
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
UNIFORM CLOTHING ITEMS/SUPPLY
RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
i::
:;t.
~
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140647
140648
140649
140650
140651
140652
140653
140654
140655
140656
140657
140658
140659
140660
140661
140662
140663
140664
140665
140666
140667
140668
140669
140670
140671
140672
VEND #
001297
001307
001336
001390
001391
001405
001411
001422
001427
001431
001448
001470
001481
001523
001604
001612
001630
001646
001669
001732
001805
001837
001843
001858
001879
001893
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRACTR
DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER LTD
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN 009859
NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY
OLYMPIC FOUNDRY INC
POSTAL EXPRESS INC
BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS INC
WESTERN POWER & EQUIPMENT
M A SEGALE INC
BLUE RIBBON WINDOW CLEANING
ALLTEL SUPPLY INC
CH2M HILL NORTHWEST INC
OCE-BRUNING INC
GIGI Y BALL
THE POLLARD GROUP INC
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
BASIN OIL CO INC
FOSTER, PEPPER & SHEFELMAN
HANSEN COMMUNICATIONS INC
VADIS NORTHWEST
PETTY CASH-COMM SR CTR
MORRIS PlHA MANAGEMENT GROUP
ABLE SPIFFY BIFFY
EARTH TECH
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
AMOUNT
310.60
25.00
1,379.14
504.19
9.95
1,846.20
12,180.00
5,701.50
290.08
110.77
100.00
152.04
12,942.23
1,151.01
30.00
270.14
646.71
800.00
40.00
73.00
3,866.00
65.88
16,761.39
1,857.53
1,050.00
35,580.00
PAGE
4
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
INTERPRETER SERVICES
PHONE SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
STORM FRAMES/HOODS/GRATES
CITY MAIL POSTAGE/COURIER SVCS
ENGINEERING & REVIEW SERVICES
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS & SUPPLIES
ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJECT
CITY FACILITIES WINDOW WASHING
TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SVCS
PLANS COPIER MAINT/SUPPLIES
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
PRINTING SERVICES
POLICE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES
WASTE OIL RECYCLING SERVICES
FMLA ROUNDTABLE SESSION
SWM AFTER HOURS ANSWERING SVCS
ROADS LANDSCAPE/LITTER CONTROL
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
CITY/POLICE FACILITIES LEASE
PARKS SANITATION RENTAL
CONTRACTED ENGINEERING SVCS
SCHOOL IMPACT FEES COLLECTED
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
1:: OS/28/98
~ OS/28/98
~ OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140673
140674
140675
140676
140677
140678
140679
140680
140681
140682
140683
140684
140685
140686
140687
140688
140689
140690
140691
140692
140693
140694
140695
140696
140697
140698
VEND #
001898
001902
001938
001988
002007
002010
002038
002044
002087
002093
002098
002204
002263
002275
002351
002399
002426
002517
002521
002534
002544
002545
002547
002557
002562
002571
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
AMOUNT
KING COUNTY FINANCE OFFICE
MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE
230.00
1,191.64
BURNER & CONTROL SERVICES LLC
118.37
SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY
27.52
PETPRO PRODUCTS INC
545.59
KCM INC
1,878.61
WEST COAST BUSINESS FORMS
973.43
PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY INC
634.14
WHITMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
389.00
RALEIGH, SCHWARZ & POWELL INC
248.00
TCN, INC. DBA TRANSPORATION CO
1,817.50
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY
22.91
3H CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
2,010.00
WA STATE-LABOR & INDUSTRIES
315.00
CASCADE MOBILE MIX CONCRETE
412.68
RECOGNITION PLUS
308.94
UNITED GROCERS INC
105.25
ROB VAN ORSOW
95.00
SUPERLON PLASTICS COMPANY
1,237.31
705.90
ARBORS CAN INC
HYUNDAI FOOD
60.88
PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC
1,037.40
W W GRAINGER INC
312.26
PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT
167.26
INTERSTATE BATTERIES SEATTLE
88.50
FEDERAL WAY CHORALE
1,750.00
PAGE
5
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
HOME FREE GUARANTEE PROGRAM
PARKS/PW LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS
DUMAS BAY FURNACE/BOILR REPAIR
KLCC KITCHEN LINEN SERVICES
PET WASTE COLLECTORS FOR PARKS
MALL DETENTION PHASE 2 DESIGN
PRINTING SERVICES
PRINTED SAFETY SIGNS
FACILITIES CARPET CLEANING
VEHICLE INSURANCE PREMIUMS
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
ROADS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
CABLE TV CONSULTANT SERVICES
FACILITIES BOILER INSPECTIONS
CONCRETE FOR PARKS MAINT USE
RECREATION PROGRAM TROPHIES
RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENTS
SWM PIPE/IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
HAZARDOUS TREES REMOVAL SVCS
KLCC KOREAN LUNCHES SUPPLIES
FACILITIES HVAC SYSTEM SVCS
SWM/PARKS MAINT EQUIPMENT/SUPP
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT
RECYCLING EVENT STAFFING/CORES
ARTS PROGRAM MUSIC CONCERTS
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
...c. OS/28/98
+- OS/28/98
......j OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140699
140700
140701
140702
140703
140704
140705
140706
140707
140708
140709
140710
140711
140712
140713
140714
140715
140716
140717
140718
140719
140720
140721
140722
140723
140724
VEND #
002595
002656
002679
002692
002731
002797
002798
002866
002935
002945
002946
002950
003039
003043
003048
003053
003070
003071
003093
003100
003111
003129
003187
003215
003224
003236
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
MEYER BROS ROOFING INC
PETTY CASH FUND-SENIORS ACCT
SAI C KANG
TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
EXHIBIT TOURING SERVICES
MYRIAM LOMBARDO
HANNA NGUYEN
JOAN HERMLE
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION
BEVERLY'S HAPPY KEYBOARDS
CITY OF NORMANDY PARK-ACC
WETLANDS & WOODLANDS INC
RONALD T WOOD
OLEG K STEKLAR
PETTY CASH-PUBLIC SAFETY DEPT
THE BUMGARDNER ARCHITECTS
KAREN K MCMILLION
INCA ENGINEERS INC
CASCADE COMPUTER MAINTENANCE
CARBCO INC
NATIONAL MAINT CONTRACTORS INC
AMS LASER SUPPLY
TOM CHANEY
SEATTLE PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO
BARNES & NOBLE INC
QFC
AMOUNT
1,338.55
58.10
187.50
1,180.00
800.00
35.00
52.50
120.48
450.00
100.00
100,000.00
2,432.64
254.20
147.50
297.54
34,112.11
530.00
18,266.98
261.84
1,093.64
1,825.00
104.26
80.30
78.82
121.63
75.98
PAGE
6
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
RETAINAGE PAYABLE RELEASE
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
POLICE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE
CITY HALL ARTS EXHIBIT RENTAL
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
EDUCATION ASSISTANCE REIMBURMT
POLICE CALEA CONFERENCE
PIANO TUNING & REPAIR SERVICES
AIRPORT COALITION CITY SHARE
PLANTS FOR WETLANDS
POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENTS
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT
DBC RENOVATION STUDY SERVICES
DISTRICT COURT SCREENER SVCS
INTERSECTION MODIFICATION SVCS
LASER PRINTERS MAINTENANCE
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS/SERVICE
FACILITIES JANITORIAL SERVICE
TONER FOR LASER PRINTERS
POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
PARTS FOR WEED SPRAYER
WEB PUBLISHING/COREL WP BOOKS
FOOD SUPPLIES FOR CITY EVENTS
1=
:::r:.
0\>
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140725
140726
140727
140728
140729
140730
140731
140732
140733
140734
140735
140736
140737
140738
140739
140740
140741
140742
140743
140744
140745
140746
140747
140748
140749
140750
VEND #
003270
003313
003341
003472
003500
003563
003589
003643
003670
003736
003816
003832
003837
003841
003852
003874
003892
003893
003894
003947
003948
004004
004050
004110
004113
004166
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
SEBRIS BUSTO PS
SUPER SEER CORPORATION
KING COUNTY FINANCE DEPT
RATELCO COMMUNICATION SVC INC
WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS
VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES
HELSELL FETTERMAN LLP
IABTI
NORTHWEST TOWING INC
OLYMPIC REPROGRAPHICS
CITY OF SEATTLE POLICE DEPT
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
TEMPORARY STORAGE OF WA INC
EVANS & ASSOCIATES INC
MCHUGH PROPERTIES
MONTGOMERY WATER GROUP INC
PORTER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
EDGEWOOD FIREPLACE SHOP INC
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
MICHAEL P WILLIAMS CONSULTING
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH SVCS
LISA M READ P.E.
CSCDHH
AMOUNT
97.50
477.55
14.00
93.18
227.52
74,610.50
88.00
1,262.54
375.00
51.49
2,145.09
82.00
16.25
50.00
63.67
1,526.00
3,106.61
20,990.20
1,133.75
358.69
43.36
125.00
676.46
1,410.75
420.00
50.00
PAGE
7
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT
KING COUNTY BLDG PARKING FEES
POLICE RADIO REPAIRS
RADAR MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
POLICE EMERGENCY DISPATCH SVCS
POLICE MEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL
PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES
IABTI POLICE CONFERENCE
VEHICLE TOWING FOR POLICE
PRINTING SERVICES
POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION SERVICES
DOCUMENTS DELIVERY SERVICES
SPECIAL EVENT SANI-CAN RENTAL
LEGAL INVESTIVATIVE SERVICES
SPACE LEASE FOR POLICE USE
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM EVALUATIONS
S 356TH ST STORAGE PROJECT
PORTER BROS CONST RETAINAGE
POLICE USE CASH FUNDS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICES
POLICE VEHICLES/EQUIPMT LEASE
CELEBRATION PK CONSULTING SVCS
OUTCOMES MEASURES TRAINING SVC
CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW SVCS
SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER SVCS
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98
DATE
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
-..t OS/28/98
,:::r: OS/28/98
....D OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
OS/28/98
09:16
CHECK #
140751
140752
140753
140754
140755
140756
140757
140758
140759
140760
140761
140762
140763
140764
140765
140766
140767
140768
140769
140770
140771
14 0772
140773
140774
140775
140776
VEND #
004175
004273
004277
004280
004281
004288
004302
004315
004316
004317
004321
004328
004334
004337
004343
004344
004352
004353
004355
004357
004361
004362
004366
004371
004375
004376
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
AMOUNT
SUNNY JACKSON
58.24
JEFFREY K DAY
1,038.28
JERRY NYBO CONSTRUCTION INC
9,945.60
NORTHWEST JANITORIAL SUPPLY
566.44
NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
292.10
LAKE TAPPS PRESSURE WASH
468.39
FEDERAL WAY NEWS
13.00
BRENT'S ALIGHMENT & REPAIR INC
504.14
A & A TOWING SERVICES LLC
44.99
RITZ CAMERA ONE HOUR PHOTO
562.68
MARTHA LAKE ELECTRONICS
298.13
ENGINEERING NEWS-RECD MAGAZINE
80.07
RYAN PLANNING RESOURCES
1,125.75
342.09
AMERICOM TECHNOLOGY
GRANITE COMMUNICATIONS
401.00
EMERGENCY FEEDING PROGRAM
1,250.00
VRI MANAGED CARE
315.00
PCA MAIL & OFFICE EQUIPMENT
SCHELDE NORTH AMERICA LLC
89.60
19.50
REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY
7,434.18
NATIONAL SOCIETY-PROFESSIONAL
156.00
STOCK UP!
175.00
FLOYD EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC
39.38
JO'S SEWING SERVICE
837.59
BAUDVILLE INC
29.90
NIOA (NATIONAL INFORMATION
60.00
PAGE
8
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES
CROWN PT EMERGENCY REPAIR SVCS
FACILITIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
FACILITIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
COMMERCIAL FLEET WASHING SVCS
NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS/SUBSC
VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE TOWING SERVICES
CAMERA SUPPLIES/FILM DEVELOPMT
CAMCORDER REPAIR SERVICES
ENGINEERING SUBSCRIPTION
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES
TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
DRUG & ALCOHOL TRAINING CLASS
CHECK SIGNER REPAIRS & SERVICE
ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
CELEBRATION PARK DISPOSAL SVCS
PROF ENGINEER MEMBERSHIP DUES
VIDEO/PRODUCTION CONSULTING
METAL FOR EQP TRAILER RAMPS
POLICE MOTORCYCLE JACKETS
SERVICE AWARDS PAPER
NIAO MEMBERSHIP DUES
CHEKREG2
DATE OS/28/98 09:16
DATE CHECK # VEND #
OS/28/98 140777 004377
OS/28/98 140778 004382
OS/28/98 140779 004383
OS/28/98 140780 004385
-{:.
~
-
D
'.
NAME
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
PAUL D RUBENSTEIN
ANNE KIRKPATRICK
PETTY CASH: WELLNESS COMMITTEE
JOHN GAMACHE
TOTAL CHECKS
JOB WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
AMOUNT
388.45
200.00
362.53
70.10
638,299.98
Y
PAGE
9
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
POLICE PAINT SUPPLIES
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
'.
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/01/98
06/01/98
06/01/98
06/01/98
06/01/98
06/04/98
06/08/98
06/10/98
06/10/98
06/12/98
~
:t:..
06/12/98
06/12/98
.......
-
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09:40
CHECK #
140781
140782
140783
140784
140785
140786
140787
140788
140789
140793
140794
140795
140796
140797
140798
140799
140800
140801
140802
140803
140804
140805
140808
140809
140810
140811
VEND #
000860
000630
004386
003130
001793
001856
000315
000139
000016
000029
000033
000036
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
WASHINGTON MUTUAL
LLOYD ENTERPRISES INC
DAVID LEIDER
FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER INC
MICROFLEX INC
ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION
PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO
PSFOA-PUGET SND FINANCE OFFICR
FLEET MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
DARRELL BORNSTEIN
YELLOWSTONE INVESTMENT CO
NW SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT
KAMRAN ENTERPRISE LTD
ANNE AUERBACH
AL A. APATHY
RICK MANLEY
DEBRA L BROWNE
ANDREA GORDON
MARY J GRINSTEAD
JACQUELINE M SORDAHL
WARREN L TOBIN
ED RUSSELL STREIT
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
KING MARKING SYSTEMS
FIRESAFE INC
GRETCHEN L LUSINK
AMOUNT
200.00
45,996.23
144.04
95.00
2,123.14
24,411.95
1,000.00
40.00
100.00
930.00
31.66
13.04
10.00
40.00
270.42
24.00
13 .12
10.78
14.68
11.56
12.60
16.24
12,445.11
39.04
171.81
120.14
PAGE
1
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
RELEASE FEE FOR DEED OF TRUST
1998 STREETS MAINTENANCE SVCS
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
FBINAA POLICE CONFERENCE
SALES TAX SOFTWARE SUPPORT SVC
SWM-VACUUM/JET RODDING SERVICE
PROPERTY PURCHASE ERNEST MONEY
INTERNAL CONTROLS SEMINAR
PWST:ADMIN FEE:AKI PARCEL/312
REF:FULL ADM DEP:D.BORNSTEIN
CDP/REFUND FOR ENV PASS THRU
CDP/REFUND OF ENV PASS-THRU
CDP/REFUND ENV PASS-THRU FUNDS
REFUND: REC CLASS REGISTRATION
SALES TAX
REFUND:REC CLASS REGISTRATION
JUROR FEE-JURY WEEK MAY 11-15
JUROR FEE WEEK OF MAY 11-15
JUROR FEE WEEK OF MAY 11-15
JUROR FEE WEEK OF 5/11/98
JUROR FEE WEEK OF 5/11/98
JUROR FEE WEEK OF MAY 11-15
COPIES/FAX MACHINES MAINT/SUPP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SAFETY SUPPLIES/REPAIRS
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
-{:
::t.
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
-
~
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09:40
CHECK #
140812
140814
140815
140817
140818
140819
140820
140821
140823
140824
140825
140826
140827
140828
140829
140830
140831
140832
140833
140834
140835
140836
140838
140839
140840
140841
VEND #
000041
000043
000049
000051
000055
000056
000063
000075
000089
000094
000096
000101
000104
000106
000112
000125
000142
000168
000173
000190
000196
000197
000201
000202
000217
000286
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
MURTOUGH SUPPLY COMPANY INC
NEW LUMBER & HARDWARE COMPANY
PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
SEATTLE TIMES
SIR SPEEDY PRINTING CENTER
CORPORATE EXPRESS
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
NEWS TRIBUNE
WA STATE-AUDITOR'S OFFICE
LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT
PETTY CASH
EDELINE M LOGREYRA
SELECT TRAVEL INC
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION
CITY OF FED WAY-ADVANCE TRAVEL
DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE INC
WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION
APA-AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
FORTE RENTALS INC
WEST COAST WIRE ROPE
KINKO'S INC
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
.
AMOUNT
292.81
319.73
281. 70
12,829.32
3,513.78
287.44
70.50
1,688.83
2,950.63
15,774.03
1,240.16
175.57
367.50
373.00
946.11
812.32
1,286.74
356.40
417.78
724.00
303.53
97.74
1,675.36
180.57
18.50
33.36
PAGE
2
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
CITY BLDGS MAINT SUPPLIES
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES
CITY FACILITIES ELECTRIC & GAS
NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS
PRINTING SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT
CELLULAR PHONES AIR TIME
NEWSPAPER ADS & SUBSCRIPTIONS
STATE AUDITOR SERVICES
CITY FACILITIES WATER & SEWER
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
AIRFARE FOR CITY BUSINESS TRVL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES
CITY BUSINESS TRAVEL EXPENSES
NEWSPAPER LEGAL NOTICES
LAW RESOURCE PUBLICATIONS
APA MEMBERSHIP DUES/PUBLICATN
EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES
PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PRINTING SERVICES
CITY FACILITIES PHONE SERVICES
DOCUMENTS EXPRESS DELIVERY SVC
PAGERS MONTHLY SERVICE
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
-t:.
:::r:::
06/12/98
06/12/98
OJ
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09:40
CHECK #
140842
140843
140844
140845
140846
140847
140848
140849
140850
140851
140852
140853
140854
140855
140856
140857
140858
140859
140860
140862
140863
140864
140865
140866
140867
140868
VEND #
000302
000308
000328
000332
000340
000341
000351
000355
000379
000414
000432
000438
000475
000504
000519
000536
000541
000555
000564
000570
000575
000578
000581
000582
000618
000621
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
KING COUNTY RECORDS-ELECTIONS
SUBURBAN CITIES ASSOCIATION
ERNIE'S FUEL STOPS (DBA)
ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS INC
WA STATE-INFORMATION SERVICES
SUNRISE SELF STORAGE
SEATTLE TIMES-SUBSCRIPTIONS
APA-ZONING NEWS
SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
CAFE PACIFIC CATERING INC
TAYLOR RENTAL
DELI SMITH & CHOCOLATE JONES
CUSTOM SECURITY SYSTEMS
ORIENTAL GARDEN CENTER
JOBS AVAILABLE INC
VOLT TEMPORARY SERVICES
WESTERN EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS
CRISIS CLINIC
KING COUNTY PET LICENSE
EAGLE TIRE & AUTOMOTIVE (DBA)
ATTORNEYS INFORMATION BUREAU
DETAIL PLUS
TOOL TOWN INC
RODDA PAINT
UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY
MELVYN E WOODS
AMOUNT
57.73
100.00
4,190.91
163.60
1,088.18
795.00
26.65
50.00
120.00
12,109.26
31.57
79.41
162.74
49.35
122.40
2,606.12
19,893.35
28.00
850.00
3,205.38
20.00
325.80
21. 58
278.48
9.21
19.50
PAGE
3
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
KING COUNTY CODE SUPPLEMENTS
SCA DINNER MEETINGS
GASOLINE FOR CITY VEHICLES
LEGAL MESSENGER SERVICES
SCAN LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
STORAGE UNITS RENTAL FEES
NEWSPAPER SUBCRIPTION
APA ZONING NEWS SUBSCRIPTION
SO COUNTY SUBSCRIP/ADVERTISEMT
DUMAS BAY CENTRE CATERING SVCS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FOOD SUPPLIES FOR MEETINGS
ALARM MONITORING & SERVICES
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPLIES
NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENTS
OFFICE TEMPORARY HELP SERVICES
TORO GM3000 MOWER
WHERE TO TURN PUBLICATION
PET LICENSE FEES COLLECTED
VEHICLES MAINTENANCE & PARTS
LAW INFORMATION RETAINER/SVCS
FORD MINI BUS DETAILING WORK
REPAIR & MAINT TOOLS/SUPPLIES
PAINT AND REPAIR SUPPLIES
PARKS GROUNDS MAINT SUPPLIES
PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES
~
:J::
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
-
..f::
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09:40
CHECK #
140869
140870
140871
140872
140873
140874
140875
140876
140877
140878
140879
140880
140881
140882
140883
140884
140885
140886
140887
140888
140889
140890
140891
140892
140893
140894
VEND #
000650
000654
000667
000697
000708
000718
000721
000724
000730
000738
000771
000783
000790
000808
000846
000854
000876
000908
000915
000920
000939
000947
000976
000989
001018
001052
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
COASTLINE FORD TRACTOR
SEARS
RADIO SHACK
PIERCE COUNTY BUDGET & FINANCE
NRPA-NAT'L REC & PARK ASSOC
JENNINGS EQUIPMENT INC
AMERICAN CONCRETE INC
HOME GUARD SECURITY SERVICES
ENTRANCO
G I JOE'S FEDERAL WAY
COSTCO
FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL CO INC
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ICMA
D J TROPHY
FAMILIAN NORTHWEST INC
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
GRETCHEN HAYES
PAPER DIRECT INC
CULLYSPRING WATER COMPANY INC
SQUEEGEE CLEAN WINDOW CLEANING
WENDLE FORD SALES INC
FRED MEYER INC
NELSON TRUCK EQUIPMENT CO INC
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
AMOUNT
584.85
234.49
557.19
20,444.17
615.50
10,538.53
333.67
23.95
9,014.10
326.76
742.99
285.88
35.10
292.66
76.50
56.69
1,233.70
175.00
57.35
72.85
118.92
2,340.00
31,209.00
50.90
6,774.09
120.44
PAGE
4
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS/SUPPLIES
PW/PARKS UNIFORM CLOTHING
BATTERIES FOR POLICE EQUIPMENT
PUBLIC LEGAL DEFENSE SERVICES
ANNUAL AGENCY DUES/PUBLICATION
PARKS KUBOTA MOWER
CEMENT & SURFACING MATERIALS
FACILITIES ALARM MONITORING
ROADS IMPROVEMENT ENGINEERING
SWM SAFETY CLOTHING/FLEET SUPL
HOUSEHOLD SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT
RECYCLING DISPOSAL SERVICES
NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION
ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLY
GOVERNMENTAL PUBLICATIONS
PRINTED NAME PLATES/PLAQUES
PARKS MAINT DRINKING FOUNTAIN
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARK FACILITIES BOTTLED WATER
FACILITIES JANITORIAL SERVICES
FLEET FORD RANGER SUPERCABS
RECREATION/POLICE SUPPLIES
FLEET TRUCK BED ACCESSORIES
FLEET REPAIR & MAINT SUPPLIES
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
~
:t::.
06/12/98
06/12/98
-
06/12/98
06/12/98
~
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09:40
CHECK #
140895
140896
140897
140898
140899
140900
140901
140902
140903
140904
140905
140906
140907
140908
140909
140910
140911
140912
140913
140914
140915
140916
140917
140918
140919
140920
VEND #
001102
001109
001139
001174
001183
001189
001206
001233
001234
001267
001282
001291
001297
001315
001390
001424
001431
001457
001470
001498
001522
001552
001593
001600
001612
001630
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
AMOUNT
SEATTLE DATA SYSTEMS INC
103.25
SMITH TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO
RED WING SHOE STORE
293.65
115.00
PNBOA-PACIFIC NW BASKETBALL
6,043.50
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DIST #210
138.73
PETTY CASH
218.34
WSSUA-WA STATE SOFTBALL UMPIRE
4,378.00
37.26
AT & T BUSINESS SERVICE
MCCARTHY CAUSSEAUX ROURKE INC
314.90
TOP FOODS HAGGEN INC
142.02
LONDI LINDELL
108.88
CAPITAL COMMUNICATIONS
105.00
FACILITY MAINTENANCE CONTRACTR
139.01
MOUNTAIN MIST WATER
413 .44
EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN 009859
736.01
SOUND ELEVATOR
105.38
M A SEGALE INC
1,533.25
KELLY FENCING
1,897.24
ALLTEL SUPPLY INC
353.99
R W RHINE INC
73.69
AMERICAN RED CROSS
200.00
PETTY CASH-KLCC REC DEPT
139.15
FEDERAL WAY TOWING INC
328.23
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES
941.29
THE POLLARD GROUP INC
116.99
BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
2,112.63
PAGE
5
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
RIBBONS FOR LINE PRINTER
FLEET ENGINE OIL REPAIR
UNIFORM SAFETY FOOTWEAR
REC BASKETBALL OFFICIALS SVCS
PARK UTILITY WATER SVCS SHARE
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENTS
REC SOFTBALL UMPIRES SVCS
LONG DISTANCE PHONE SERVICES
HEARING EXAMINER SERVICES
RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
TAPES FOR COMMISSION MEETINGS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES
CITY HALL/POLICE BOTTLED WATER
MAINTENANCE & REPAIR SUPPLIES
CITY HALL BLDG ELEVATOR MAINT
ASPHALT OVERLAY PROJECT
FENCING SUPPLIES & REPAIR SVCS
KFT MUSIC ON HOLD SERVICES
SWM ASPHALT DUMPING FEES
FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT
VEHICLE TOWING SVC FOR POLICE
COMPUTER SYSTEM SUPPLIES
PRINTING SERVICES
POLICE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES
f:
J:-
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
~
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09 :40
CHECK #
140921
140922
140923
140924
140925
140926
140927
140928
140929
140930
140931
140932
140933
140934
140935
140936
140937
140938
140939
140940
140941
140942
140943
140944
140945
140946
VEND #
001666
001686
001715
001732
001814
001856
001879
001902
001936
001939
001968
001969
001988
001990
002010
002024
002044
002086
002127
002129
002204
002227
002231
002285
002426
002445
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
R & D SUPPLY INC
FIRST CHOICE BUSINESS MACHINES
TRUGREEN-CHEMLAWN
HANSEN COMMUNICATIONS INC
PARAMETRIX INC
ACTION SERVICES CORPORATION
EARTH TECH
MYERS MASTER LAWN CARE
PAGENET
LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
RICOH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY
SERVICE LINEN SUPPLY
WESTERN LINEN/WELCOME MAT
KCM INC
PETTY CASH-WITNESS FEES
PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY INC
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
PARK & PLAYGROUND PRODUCTS
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SERVICE
WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY
ROBERT ETTINGER
SHELDON & ASSOCIATES INC
SEATTLE AQUARIUM
UNITED GROCERS INC
BATES TECHNICAL COLLEGE
AMOUNT
72 .62
245.20
415.94
71.50
8,953.09
135.00
560.00
16,038.16
753.98
13,460.90
120.55
15.20
109.91
118.92
32,829.06
82.88
782.99
2,509.75
393.88
279.00
252.88
141.18
1,039.95
123.90
232.22
1,972.50
PAGE
6
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
CITY BLDGS MAINT SUPPLIES
COPIER REPAIR, MAINT, SUPPLIES
PARKS PESTICIDE SPRAYING SVCS
SWM AFTER HOURS ANSWERING SVCS
BPA TRAIL CORRIDOR PHASE II
SWM-VACUUM/JET RODDING SERVICE
GENERAL SURVEYING SERVICES
PARKS/PW LANDSCAPE MAINT SVCS
PAGERS LEASE & SERVICES
ENGINEERING REVIEW SERVICES
FAX/COPIER SUPPLIES & MAINT
KING COUNTY ZONING CODE BOOK
KLCC KITCHEN LINEN SERVICES
KLCC RENTAL MAT SERVICES
SW 340TH REGL STORAGE CONSTN
DISTRICT COURT WITNESSES FEES
PRINTED SAFETY SIGNS
LAW FAX MACHINE AND SUPPLIES
PICNIC TABLE/BLEACHER PARTS
LOCAL/STATE FUNDING REPORT
ROADS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
WETLANDS BIOLOGIST SERVICES
SPEC POPS TRIP ADMISSION FEES
RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES
FRONTLINE LEADERSHIP TRAINING
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
-f:
-¡:
06/12/98
06/12/98
-
06/12/98
06/12/98
--:J
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09:40
CHECK #
140947
140948
140949
140950
140951
140952
140953
140954
140955
140956
140957
140958
140959
140960
140961
140962
140963
140964
140965
140966
140967
140968
140969
140970
140971
140972
VEND #
002544
002545
002547
002548
002557
002562
002569
002664
002679
002798
002807
002826
002853
002887
002898
002933
002935
002960
003013
003043
003059
003070
003071
003072
003111
003137
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
HYUNDAI FOOD
PACIFIC AIR CONTROL INC
W W GRAINGER INC
SPRAGUE PEST CONTROL
PETTY CASH FUND-PARKS MAINT
INTERSTATE BATTERIES SEATTLE
BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS
FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC
SAI C KANG
HANNA NGUYEN
MEHDI SADRI
KASSEL CONSTRUCTION INC
25 MINUTE PHOTO
EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES
IACP
RONALD JORGENSEN
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION
THE PARAGON GROUP INC
LAUCKS TESTING LABS INC
OLEG K STEKLAR
TEK-KIAT PEIRCE
KAREN K MCMILLION
INCA ENGINEERS INC
HLA INFRASTRUCTURE INC
NATIONAL MAINT CONTRACTORS INC
KING COUNTY-TREASURY DIVISION
AMOUNT
52.06
146.70
124.01
276.93
140.78
39.10
37.98
225.90
225.00
75.00
633.60
518,084.59
95.11
18,505.44
260.00
1,992.80
568.00
11.60
80.00
190.00
45.00
440.00
13,006.51
7,442.20
1,118.00
476.46
PAGE
7
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
KLCC KOREAN LUNCHES SUPPLIES
FACILITIES HVAC SYSTEM SVCS
SWM/PARKS MAINT EQUIPMENT/SUPP
FACILITIES PEST CONTROL SVCS
PETTY CASH FUND REIMBURSEMENT
PAGER BATTERIES
RECREATION GLOVES/SHIN GUARDS
EMPLOYEES FLEX ACCOUNTS PLAN
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
KNUTSEN FAMILY THEATRE PROJECT
PRINTING/PHOTO SERVICES
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES
IACP MEMBERSHIP DUES/SEMINARS
RECREATION PROGRAM CLASSES
POLICE CALEA CONFERENCE
VIDEO TAPE DUPLICATION SERVICE
SWM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY SVCS
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
DISTRICT COURT SCREENER SVCS
DOWNTOWN CORE STUDY PROJECT
CELEBRATION PARK ROAD DESIGN
FACILITIES JANITORIAL SERVICE
PARK SOIL CONSRV/IMPR ASSESSMT
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
+:
:¡::
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
D() 06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
.
09:40
CHECK #
140973
140974
140975
140976
140977
140978
140979
140980
140981
140982
140983
140984
140985
140986
140987
140988
140989
140990
140991
140992
140993
140994
140995
140996
140997
140998
VEND #
003157
003170
003209
003210
003211
003266
003276
003302
003371
003410
003459
003466
003472
003500
003511
003514
003563
003565
003600
003619
003645
003667
003675
003736
003754
003831
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
AMOUNT
LES SCHWAB TIRE CTRS OF WA INC
475.70
MODERN SECURITY SYSTEMS INC
30.00
WASHINGTON POLYGRAPH
250.00
HOUGH BECK & BAIRD INC
3,105.01
307.23
IRON MOUNTAIN/SAFESITE INC
TRENT D MILLER P.E.
6,708.00
125.00
LABOR RELATIONS INFO SYSTEM
PROLINE INDUSTRIES INC
195.48
OFFICE TEAM
5,372.68
29.63
BP OIL COMPANY
MICHAEL KIM
LIGHTNING POWDER COMPANY INC
58.50
271.75
RATELCO COMMUNICATION SVC INC
287.79
WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS
487.88
J C RICHARDS CONSTR CO INC
104.26
THE JANUS GROUP
1,500.00
VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
BEL CUSTOM CLEANERS (DBA)
250.00
SPILLMAN TECHNOLOGIES INC
2,723.42
2,030.00
FEDERAL WAY CYCLE CENTER
1,201.42
AMERICAN JANITORIAL SERVICE
4,778.61
AT & T WIRELESS LONG DISTANCE
3.17
ART CRAFT INC
280.33
NORTHWEST TOWING INC
524.04
KENT OXYGEN CO INC
19.42
GSR POLYGRAPH SERVICES
375.00
PAGE
8
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
FLEET VEHICLE REPAIR SERVICES
ALARM MONITORING SERVICES
POLICE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPHS
PARK PLANNING SERVICES
CITY RECORDS STORAGE SERVICES
PROJECT ENGINEER SERVICES
POL LABOR NEWS SUBSCRIPTION
POLICE HITACHI PRINTER KITS
OFFICE TEMPORARY HELP SERVICES
FUEL FOR POLICE VEHICLES
POLICE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
POLICE FINGERPRINT/SUPPLIES
POLICE RADIO REPAIRS
EXPERT WITNESS/REPAIR SUPPLIES
CITY FACILITY REPAIRS
OUTPLACEMENT CONSULTATION SVCS
POLICE EMERGENCY DISPATCH SVCS
POLICE UNIFORMS CLEANING SVCS
POL RECORDS MGMT SOFTWARE/SVCS
POL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/SUPPLIES
DUMAS BAY CENTRE JANITORIAL SV
CELL PHONE LONG DISTANCE CHGS
RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES
VEHICLE TOWING FOR POLICE
POLICE WELDING SUPPLIES
POLICE POLYGRAPH TESTING
.
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98
DATE
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
{:
1:.
06/12/98
06/12/98
...()
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
06/12/98
09:40
CHECK #
140999
141000
141001
141002
141003
141004
141005
141006
141007
141008
141009
141010
141011
141012
141013
141014
141015
141016
141017
141018
141019
141020
141021
141022
141023
141024
VEND #
003834
003837
003846
003852
003898
003922
003947
003970
004004
004054
004075
004093
004099
004110
004113
004147
004174
004203
004244
004260
004264
004280
004281
004294
004296
004298
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
SOUND TELECOM
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES
EVANS & ASSOCIATES INC
RADIO COMMUNICATION SERVICES
NATIONAL BAG COMPANY INC
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DELORES BOTKIN
PACIFIC COAST FORD INC
WICKLANDER-ZULAWSKI & ASSOC
SIGN OF DISTINCTION BY CAROLYN
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
MARK HARREUS
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH SVCS
LISA M READ P.E.
FRONTIER BANK-LAKE CITY
PSI-PROFESSIONAL SV INDUSTRIES
HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
LMN ARCHITECTS
STAN PALMER CONSTRUCTION INC
THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT LLC
NORTHWEST JANITORIAL SUPPLY
NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
POLAROID CORPORATION
NEIL DOYLE
MELANIE PRITCHARD-KOSOFF
AMOUNT
151.00
47.50
520.00
1,171.00
2,280.00
151.25
1,653.43
40.00
75.00
379.00
156.96
393.65
94.25
65.32
6,405.00
25,004.08
1,648.50
11.73
15.56
823,024.03
390.96
201.76
135.66
3,779.28
82.88
2,058.00
PAGE
9
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
PARK EMERGENCY ANSWERING SVC
DOCUMENTS DELIVERY SERVICES
POLICE SEMINAR
LEGAL INVESTIVATIVE SERVICES
POLICE RADIO COMMUNICATION SVC
POLICE EVIDENCE SUPPLIES
POLICE USE CASH FUNDS
POLICE EVIDENCE BLOOD DRAWS
POLICE VEHICLES/EQUIPMT LEASE
POLICE FIELD INTERVIEWING SEMR
POLICE SIGNS/BANNERS
DATA COMM LINE SERVICES
POLICE BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
OUTCOMES MEASURES TRAINING SVC
CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW SVCS
KNUTZEN FAM THEATRE RETAINAGE
DBC SOILS TESTING SERVICES
PARTS FOR UREA TANK
URBAN DESIGN SERVICES
CELEBRATION PARK DEVELOPMENT
SOFTWARE CONSULTING SERVICES
FACILITIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
FACILITIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
CRIME SCENE CAMERA/SUPPLIES
CITY BUSINESS REIMBURSEMENT
RECREATION GYMNASTICS INSTRUCN
CHEKREG2
DATE 06/12/98 09:40
DATE CHECK # VEND #
06/12/98 141025 004313
06/12/98 141026 004323
06/12/98 141027 004349
06/12/98 141028 004354
06/12/98 141029 004357
06/12/98 141030 004359
06/12/98 141031 004365
06/12/98 141032 004367
06/12/98 141033 004370
06/12/98 141034 004372
06/12/98 141035 004379
06/12/98 141036 004387
+: 06/12/98 141037 004401
1:: 06/12/98 141038 004402
V 06/12/98 141039 004403
()
06/12/98 141040 004412
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CHECK REGISTER
NAME
OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES INC
ECONOMY HANDICRAFTS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR
DON JENSEN
REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY
CENTURY SQUARE SELF-STORAGE
RED WING SHOE STORE
GREENE-GASAWAY ARCHITECTS PLLC
WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL
ICS SUPPORT
WACVEO-WA ASSOC OF COMMERCIAL
WCSAP (WA COALITION OF SEXUAL
WA STATE-CONSERVATION COMMISSN
MOHAMMED K ROASHAU
HARRIS K~Y
CITY OF TACOMA/SURPLUS SALES
TOTAL CHECKS
JOB WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
AMOUNT
6,709.25
25.44
100.00
40.00
1,406.06
95.00
97.75
9,447.50
82.50
5,750.38
125.00
180.00
12.30
70.00
30.00
2,250.00
1,862,965.53
Y
PAGE 10
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
CP TESTING & INSPECTION SVCS
RECREATION SUPPLIES
AGENCY NOVA MEMBERSHIP
POLICE SUPPLIES
CELEBRATION PARK DISPOSAL SVCS
SW&R STORAGE RENTAL FEES
UNIFORM SAFETY FOOTWEAR
CELEBRATION PARK CONSULTANT SV
SPECIAL POPS ADMISSION FEES
COMPUTER HARDWARE & SOFTWARE
POLICE SEMINAR
POLICE SEMINAR
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PHOTOCOPIES
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
DISTRICT COURT INTERPRETER SVC
SURPLUS KAWASAKI MOTORCYCLES
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM# f (i:,-)
. ... ..........,........................................................................................... ................................
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: Monthly Financial Report
.....,........... ..........,.... ..,..................,............................,.............................................. .........
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
X CONSENT
_ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMATION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
..............,...........,....,................"...............................................,........................................
ATTACHMENTS: Monthly Financial Report
.........................,............,....,......,............,.....,..........."....,..........,...............................,.......
SUMMARY /BACKGROUND: Month of May 1998
...............,....................................,.....,..........,.............,........................,.............................
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Was approved by the
Finance Committee at their meeting on June 23, 1998.
.............,...........................,............................."................,.................,,...........,.................
I¡
~~.~~.~~~ ~ ~J~. ~.~.1~4~~ ~~:..~~:... ~~~!~:.: ...~.:-1
dJ¡¿
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE;)
COUNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED
DENIED
- T ABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1st READING
ENACTMENT READ
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
.................,..,..,.................................,...................,.......................,.......,............................
MEMORANDUM
Date:
June 23,1998
To:
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee
From:
Marie Mosley, Deputy Management Services Director
Subject:
May Monthly Financial Report
Action Requested:
Accept the Monthly Financial Report and forward to the June Council meeting for approval.
"
APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE REPORT
Committee Chair: Mary Gates Þ Committee Member: Jeanne Burbidge ~
Committee Member: Linda Kochmar 18"/
46.
¡F=C&ßED-
~~ FlY"
May 1998, Monthly Financial Report
I I -
Graph 1
Fund Balance Composition $10.19 Million
Unreserved
Snow & Ice 14.1%
1.0%
P3/lntfnd
SWM
0 Loans
8.4 Yo 3.0% Police
5.7%
.,~...",.,,~"""57,-"'~:~'~~""""'-"
Strategic Resv \..... ~.. ..:. - ~
19.6%
Designated Debt svc
0.1% «.5%
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
1
Summary
1
Fund Balance Position 1
Solid Waste
3.6% Revenues 1
Expenditure 2
Conclusion 2
INTRODUCTION
The Monthly Financial Report (MFR)
is intended to provide an overview of
financial activity that have taken
place in the reporting period. This
report focuses mainly on activity
incurred in the following operating
funds: General, Street, Arterial
Street, Utility Tax Projects, Solid
Waste, Snow and Ice Removal,
Paths & Trail, Surface Water
Management, Strategic Reserve,
Airport Strategic Reserve, Debt
Service, and Dumas Bay Centre.
There is a synopsis of the City's
Capital Improvement Funds on
pages 16 through 18. The Summary
of Sources and Uses (Attachment A)
captures financial activity through
May for the years 1994 through
1998.
SUMMARY
Overall, operating revenues
$15,453,156 are above the monthly
budget projection of $15,109,907 as
of May 1998, and operating
expenditures $10,761,956 are also
within the anticipated budget
expenditures $10,835,126 for the
period. The above results in the
City's operating funds having a
projected increase in fund balance of
$416,419 as of the end of May,
1998.
REVENUES
Graph 2 illustrates, through Maya
comparison of actual revenue
collections versus monthly estimates
based on historical trends.
Attachment A further details
operating revenue collections and
trends between 1994 and 1998.
The City has collected $15,453,156
or 44.98% of the annual operating
budget ($34,356,742) thru May.
Operating revenues have grown
$1,749,952 or 12.8% compared with
activity through May 1997
($13,703,204) due primarily to the
addition of a utility tax rate increase
which was not effective until March,
1997. The favorable variance is
also attributed to Real Estate
Excise Taxes (REET) which are
continuing to exceed budgetary
estimates by $426,434 or 106.0%
(Attachment A reflects an estimated
accrual for May 1998). In addition,
fines and forfeitures are exceeding
budgetary projections by $76,543 or
28.7%.
State-shared revenues are
exceeding budgetary estimates by
$155,632 or 9.5%. Local criminal
justice sales tax to date of $440,367
is exceeding the estimated revenues
($379,810) by $60,557 or 15.9%.
Equalization is exceeding estimated
revenues ($44,567) by $48,323 or
108.4%.
Sales tax revenues are exceeding
budgetary estimates ($2,871,587) by
$23,321 or 0.8% through April, 1998.
Compared to 1997 activity
4E, .
.
City of Federal Way
($2,786,725), revenues
increased $108,184 or 3.9%.
have
~...ý 1998 Monthly Financial Report
Building permit and plan check
activity has stayed consistently
under budgetary projections by
$71,079 or 21.4%. Interest
earnings are exceeding original
estimates by $61,704 or 26.0%
through May. Finally, recreation
fees are above budget by $11,690
or 6.7%. When compared to 1997
activity, fees have increased
$15,436 or 9.0%.
EXPENDITURES
The City has expended $10,761,956
or 29.8% of the annual operating
budget ($36,059,171) through May.
Operating expenditures are below
the revised budget ($10,835,126) by
$73,170 or 0.7% and have increased
$764,071 or 7.6% when compared
with activity through May 1997
($9,997,885). This variance consists
of savings in Management Services,
Criminal legal Services, Public
Safety and Parks and Recreation
and excess expenditures in Solid
Waste, Community Development
and Dumas Bay Centre. It is
anticipated that these departments
will either meet projections or stay
within their budget as the year
progresses.
Management Services
expenditures total $559,577 which is
$35,835 or 6.0% below the revised
budget estimate ($595,412). The
expenditure savings are due
primarily to the concerted effort of
management to control temporary
help and overtime.
Community Development
Operations has expended
$1,091,518 or 38.8% of its annual
appropriation ($2,810,070).
Through May they have exceeded
their budget by $42,934 or 4.1 %.
Compared with 1997 activities,
expenditures have decreased
$23,221 or 2.1 %.
PARCS Operations expenditures
total $1,050,335 which is $62,863 or
5.6% below the revised budget
estimate ($1,113,198).
Expenditures have increased by
$24,622 or 2.4% as compared with
1997 activities.
Dumas Bay Centre expenditures
($160,425) are exceeding operating
budgetary estimates ($156,030) by
$4,395 or 2.8%. Compared with
1997 activities, expenditures have
decreased by $1,919 or 1.2% while
corresponding revenue growth totals
$3,655 or 2.9% above budgetary
estimates ($126,904. Revenue
collections in 1996 are meeting
budgetary projections. Overall,
Dumas Bay Centre has recovered
81.6% of its 1998 operating costs
which is below the budgeted
recovery of 84.4%.
Public Works Operations is above
revised budget estimates
($1,167,654) by $58,186 or 5.0%,
and has expended $1,225,840 or
37.6% of its annual appropriation
($3,255,218).
The Solid Waste and Recycling
program has exceeded its budgetary
projection ($85,143) by $7,008 or
8.2%. This is due in part to the on-
going implementation of the Multi-
family recycling program. This pace
is consistent with 1997. In addition,
the 1998 grant-funded Compost Bin
Distribution project is scheduled for
June 13th instead of early fall.
Surface Water Management
Operations are below projections by
$12,382 or 2.2%. Compared with
1997, public works expenditures
have increased $141,872 or 13.1%,
while SWM operations have
decreased by $67,660 or 10.9%.
The 1998 Asphalt Overlay
Program has incurred expenses of
$93,522 or 4.1 % of it's appropriated
budget ($2,295,401). The
preliminary streets overlay list went
to the March 17, 1998 Council
Meeting for approval. The project
was bid on May 12, 1998, and MA
Segole was the low bidder. The
project is going to the May 19, 1998
Council Meeting for approval to
award the contract in the amount of
$1,993,755 to MA Segole. Work
will begin in late June.
CONCLUSION
The overall operating revenues for
May are above the projected
monthly budget, with Fines &
Forfeitures, Interest Earnings and
Utility Tax exceeding monthly
budget estimates. The overall
operating expenditures are below
estimates at this time, with
Management Services, Public Safety
and Parks and Recreation under
projections and Solid Waste &
Recycling, Public Works and
Community Development exceeding
projections. It is anticipated that
these departments will meet their
budget projections as the year.
progresses.
Should you have any questions
about this monthly financial report,
please contact the following staff.
This report is prepared by the following
staff of the Management Services
Department:
Marie Mosley 661-4063
Tho Kraus 661-4170
Mari Doring 661-4096
June 18, 1998
4~.
.
City of Federal Way
May 19:18 Monthly Financial Report
Local Retail Sales Tax
Table 1 and Graph 4 summarize local retail sales tax revenues. Sales tax collections lag two months. For
April sales activities, the City accrues sales tax revenues in May, and the City receives cash in June. At the
time this report was prepared, sales tax revenues were not available for May. Attachment A reflects accrued
estimates.
~
SALES TAX REVENUES
April 19961hrough Apr1/1998
51,000,000
,
5950,000 l- - -
5900,000 ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~H:I~d:Y~s::.:n~ ~~~ - - - - - - -,
SBSO,OOO - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
seoo,ooo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
S700,OOO
S7S0,OOO
SBSO,OOO
SBOO,OOO
5550,000
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8' ~ ~ ~, ~, ~, ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"'~","'.~ ~~~,,>~<.Q~><
~i;'~",~!ð~~~,f~~i;'~",~J;o:!!,!:~,f:E¿
.
Through April sales tax proceeds totaled $2,894,909 which is $23,321 or .8% above the adopted budget
estimate ($2,871,587). Included in January 1997 sales tax revenue was $16,187 for a major retailer that
should have been reported in December 1996.
.
Compared to 1997 April sales tax, revenues have decreased $5,337 or .8%.
TABLE 1
LOCAL RETAIL SALES TAX REVENUES
1993 . 1998
1993 I 1994 1995 I 1996 1997 I 1998 1998 Budtlf't
Month Actual Aetual Actual Actulll Actual I Budget. Actulll $ Varl811C8 " V_nee
anuary $ 849,037 $ 870,318 $ 882,234 $ 883,229 $ 902,478 $ 940,317 $ 949,276 $ 8,959 1.0%
ebruary 579,220 580,171 602,830 607,790 840,967 660,714 714,640 53,926 8.2%
"arch 522,576 500,911 573,687 577,022 582,547 590,311 575,596 (14,715) -2.5%
-.
pril.' 585,809 597,164 624,667 768,960 660,733 680,245 655,396 (24,649) -3,7%
"ay 556,790 632,367 599,100 607,104 669,058 671,827 OO"!.
una 615,567 603,320 617,531 600,594 657,032 : 668,466 00%
uly 603.765 651,123 676,546 650,423 694,702 733,262 0.0%
ugust 619,020 635,050 713,489 734,368 735,617 721,508 - 0.0%
eptember 609,162 : 626,974 676,731 652,886 657,100 708,252 O.O"!.
>ctober 627,343 ' 636,254 654,050 666,751 687,585 709,512 0,0%
November 594,528 , 618,765 650,583 , 664,611 793,528 685.778 O,O"!.
December 603,980 654,256 644,666 623,3æ 638,862 698,938 0,0%
TotAl! $ 7,366,797 I $ 7,606,673 $ 7,916,114 ! $ 8,037,143 $ 8,320,209 I $ 8,4&9,131 $ 2,894,909 $ 23,321 0.8%
Deb's Sales $ 876,999,643 I $ 106,666,310 $ 942,394,624 I $ 166,802,781 $ 910,501,079 I $ 1,008,229,823 $ 344,631,969 $ 2,776,306 0.8%
. R.O'..."" mon"", -...., p...m.',,'" '998 Ado.,.- Bud..,
- -- .-... ... ..- m "'dvnont'.
Lf-G,
.
City of Federal Way
May 1 ~~d Monthly Financial Report
Graph 5 illustrates retail sales by industry sector.
Im2Jtj
RETAIL SALES TAX DISTRIBUTION
Major Industry Sectors
Se",;o..
64.9'4
Ret", T,..,
9.7%
Const'uctòon/Contrect
6.8%
Whole..;,ng
6.6%
Tr'nsp/Comm/UW'Y
4.0%
"enutectur,ng
3.9%
Governement
F'n/lns/Reel este"
1.3%
Oth..
1.2%
.-...-..-..........................-/".
0 0"
10.0"
200..
300..
.00..
500"
000..
700..
000"
.
Retail trade has generated the largest component of sales activity during April (64.9%) followed by
services (9.7%), construcVcontract (6.8%), and wholesaling (6.6%). Transport/communication/utility,
manufacturing, finance/insurance/real estate, government and other activity generate the remainder of
sales tax receipts.
Table 2 and Graph 6 compare year-to-date sales tax growth by major industry sector between 1993 and 1998.
TABLE 2
COMPARISON OF SALES TAX COLLECTIONS BY SIC CODE GROUP
Through April
Component 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Change from 1997
Group Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual $ Change " Change
~etail Trade S 1.727.772 S 1,726,595 S 1,711.039 S 1.831,184 S 1.821,592 S 1,878,668 S 57.076 3.1%
ßervicel 223.405 194.323 224,277 243.463 265,471 280,691 S 15,220 5.7%
rvonstruction/Contract 162,139 167,112 220,975 158,185 187,262 197,133 S 9,870 5.3%
~olelaling 1 38. 006 145.829 210,730 315,430 148.839 190.530 $ 41,692 28,0%
!Transp/CommlUtmty 120,420 132,444 110.748 84.168 118,835 114,878 S (3,957) -3.3%
"'anufacturing 102,900 106,404 125,832 134,191 147,133 114.298 $ (32,835) -22.3%
pther 16,259 28.970 26,766 25,295 29.336 33 . 960 $ 4,624 15.8%
in/Ins/Real Estate 21,992 23,684 24.562 27.904 35,786 37.616 $ 1,830 5,1%
~ovemment 23,749 23,203 28,490 17,201 32,472 47,135 $ 14,663 45.2%
Total $ 2,536,642 $ 2.S48,S64 $ 2,683,418 $ 2,837,021 $ 2,786,725 $ 2,894,909 $ 108,184 3.9%
Taxable Sales $ 301,981,190 $ 303,400,476 $ 319,454,512 $ 337,740,568 $ 331,752,925 $ 344,631,879 $ 12,879,054 3.9%
.
Compared with 1997, sales tax collections have increased $108,184 or 3.9%. Once again when the
correction for December 1996 receipts is considered ($16,187), the variance would be an increase of
$91,997 or 3.3%. The variances may be due to the timing of when the tax returns are filed. The returns
may be filed monthly or quarterly depending on if certain criteria are met.
.
Retailing activity has increased by $57,076 or 3.1% compared to 1997 activities. The City has
experienced increased revenues overall in the retail sector.
.
Services have experienced growth of $15,220 when compared to 1997 activity. The 5.7% increase in
services is attributable to an increase in activity for automotive repair shops and smaller business and
personal service activity.
.
Wholesaling related activity has increased by $41,692 or 28.0% when compared to 1997 activity due
primarily to increased activity.
4G.
..
City of Federal Way
May 191:18 Monthly Financial Report
.
Manufacturing activity has decreased by $32,835 or 22.3% compared to 1997. The decrease is due to a
major manufacturing company reporting sales tax quarterly in 1998 versus monthly in prior years. It is
also possible that this company may be relocating it's business.
.
Government related activity for April increased by $14,663 or 45.2% compared to 1997 due primarily to an
adjustment of $13,300 made as a result of an internal audit of a major governmental agency for the
reporting period May, 1997 through March, 1998.
Or..h .
SALES TAX GROWTH
Mljor Industry Sectors
Chlnge from April 1997 to 1998
900%
----------------------------------------- --------
100%
100%
50.0%.
300%
-10.0%
-3D 0%.
--------..--------------------------------------
-500%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - - - .. - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - - - - - - - - - .. .. - -
-10.0%
-.00%
R.,." Trodo Sorv"" Controcl,n. Who'o..hn.
TCU
M.n"
OIho'
',nllnsIRE
Govt
Table 3 details, through April, comparative sales tax activity between 1992 and 1998 segregated by various
retail centers including the SeaTac Mall, S 348th retail center and the Pavilion retail center.
TABLE 3
SALES TAX COMPARISON
Through Aprl7
Change from 1997
Group 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 5 Change % Chlnge
10111 ....el TaX ¡Z,14;J,ou8 $2.263,680 $1.536,642 52,548,564 $2,683,418 $2.83 ',021 $2.786,725 $2,894,""" 5108,184 ..9%
Ii ...."n "etll BJock $132,893 $203,666 5289,153 5291,107 5371,115 $375,647 5437,141 S444,175 $7,03. 1.6%
% chanGe from orevious vr na 53.3% 42.0"/0 0.7% 27.5% 12% 16.4% 1.6% na na
Percentage of total 6.2% 9.0% 11.4% 11.4% 13.8% 13.2% 15.7% 15.3% -0.3% -22%
sea ac Mall $374,449 $392,96& $399,069 $391,116 $403,206 5383,325 534,4 5364,686 (510,055) .2.7%
% chanœ from DreVIOUS vr na 4.9% 1.6% -20% 3.1% -4.9% -22% .2.7% na na
Percentage of total 17.5% 174% 15.7% 15.3% 15.0"/0 13.5% 13.4% 12.6% -0.8% .6.3%
MI or Auto Salel 571,272 578,813 599,050 5117,587 51 1,978 5133,508 5117,832 5134,139 51ti,306 1..8%
% change from previous vr na 10.6% 25.7% 18.7% -4.8% 19.2% .11.7% 13.8% na na
Percentage of total 3.3% 3.5% 3.9% 4.6% 42% 4.7% 4.2% 4.6% 0.4% 9.6%
5 312th to 5 316111 Block 531,888 533, 20 $34,171 532, 42 533,285 531,412 $26,232 528,128 51,8"" 7..-110
% change from previous vr na 3.9% 3.2% -4.2% 1.7% .5.6% .16.5% 7.2% na na
Percentage of total 1.5% 1.5% 1.3% 1.3% 12% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0"/0 0.0% 3.2%
Plvlllon Center nl na na na na T56,765 $51,763 $51,851 S88 o.r/'
% chanœ from Drevious vr na na na na na na na 0.2% na na
Percentaae of total na na na na na 2.0"/0 1.9% 1.8% -0.1% .36%
Hotell & Motell 510,980 510,668 510,429 59,379 512,775 59,196 512,784 $12,276 ($508) -4.0%
% chanœ from previous vr na .2.8% .22% .10.1% 362% .28.0% 39.0"/0 -4.0"/0 na na
Percentage of total 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% 0.0% .7.6%
.
The City's largest retail center, S 348th retail center which generates over 15% of the City's sales tax has
experienced a slight increase in April of $7,033 or 1.6% in taxable retail activity as compared with 1997.
.
The SeaTac Mall has a decrease in taxable retail sales through the month of April. Compared with 1997,
sales tax collections have decreased $10,055 or 2.7%. After moderate growth between 1991 and 1994,
taxable retail sales activity at the mall has steadily slowed since 1994.
.
Major Auto Sales has an increase of $16,306 or 13.8% due to increase sales.
L/-G.
II
City of Federal Way
May 1!1S8 Monthly Financial Report
Real Estate Excise Tax
.'
Graph 7 and Table 4 illustrate collection history for the 1st and 2nd Y. percent real estate excise taxes. The
table and graph both reflect the cyclical variation in this revenue source. The monthly budget estimates are
based on historical REET revenues received since incorporation in 1990 through 1997, an eight year period.
REET revenue activity for May has exceeded the adopted budget by $178,528 or 193.7%, continuing the
trend we saw in 1997. Compared with 1997 activities, REET revenues through May have increased
$205,495 or 33.0%.
.
G...Dh7
$1,000,000
$900,000
S8OO,ooo
$700,000
S6OO,ooo
$500,000
$0100,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
s-
1:
"
~
0(
Month
11193
I Achlal
80,908 $
56,212
78,549
84,173
105,092
167,854
163,092
1 06, 684
100,392
146,484
114,078
202,396
I $ 1,405,914
$ 281,182,800
anuary
ebruary
lI1arch
pril-
lI1ay
una
uly
ugust
eptember
ctober
ovember
ecember
Total
Est. RE Value
$
. R.p'..."" ...nth~ n~tonç.' p.n.m,'" th. 1998 Adopt.d Bud 81
- - ..ti-., .,. ..fIe.... in Abcn""'n! A.
State Shared Revenues
REAL ESTA-re EXCISE TAX ACTMTY
Through May
$828,147
:;;
=
!
!
!
!
I
i
TABLE 4
REAL. ESTATE EXCISE TAX REVENUES
11193 . 11198
111H 19117
Achlal I Achlal
70,177 $ 94,719
84,096 101,508
105,133 132,678
155,107 186,187
133,203 108,060
133,081 120,432
130,765 231,911
123,913 181,490
180,371 151,333
102,780 216,381
160,199 188,999
146,325 163,211
$ 1,525,150 I $ 1,875,909
$ 305,030,000 $ 375,381,716
1994
Actual
65,621 $
72,702
249,510
102,473
94,387
130,113
96,629
97,514
82,804
64 , 606
65,105
93,509
$ 1,214,173
$ 242,194,800
1895
Actual
52,253 $
63,025
83,156
73,850
73,648
107,801
70,258
183,599
82,369
76,809
132,917
95,366
$ 1,0115,051
$ 219,010,200
!
..
...
'"
;
1998
Budget'
$ 51,608 $
57,412
1 04, 084
96,965
92,144
1 04, 964
110,936
102.366
97.207
92,638
88.613
101.063
$ 1,100,000 $ 828,647 I $ 421,434 I
$ 220,000,000 $ 165,729,420 $ 85,286,820
I 1998 Budget
Actual I S Vadance I S Vadance
119.717 $ 68.109 132.0%
82.116 $ 24,704 43.0%
166.282 $ 62.198 59.8%
189,860 $ 92,895 95.8%
270.672 $ 178,528 193.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
O.O°A.
0.0%
101.0%
nl
-
-
.
.
-
.
.
Table 5 and Graph 8 present a comparison of state shared revenues received through April between 1993 and
1998 by revenue type. Accrued estimates for May are reflected in Attachment A for local criminal justice
sales tax, fuel taxes and vehicle license fees. These payments will be received in June for the month of May.
TABLE 5
STATE SHARED REVENtÆS
1993 - 1998
1993 11194 11195 111H I 11191 I 1998 1998 BudII«
Revenue Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual I Budf et . Actual S Vatlance S Vatiance
~or Vehicle Excise Tax $ 296,876 $ 329.887 $ 330,289 $ 210.901 $ 222.358 $ 231.089 $ 235,970 $ 4,881 2.1'11
amper Excise Tax 2.603 2,803 2,820 2,746 2,738 3,228 2,862 (366) -11.3'11
iquor Profrts Tax 128,216 109,373 100,284 97,958 , 102,169 105.463 116,124 10,661 10.1'11
iquor Excise Tax 67,016 65,008 61,866 58,264 59,192 54,972 63,000 8,028 14.6%
(;rim Just Low-PopIDCD 36,913 77,715 90,242 79.612 31,336 24.728 31,620 6,892 27.goÆ
rim Just Hgh Crime - 79,796 63,289 68,689 59,966 60 ,000 73,376 13,376 22.3%
qualization 181,444 180.474 149,629 103,391 . 92,810 44,567 92 ,890 48,323 108.4
ocal Crim Just - 245,669 258,466 263,671 265,574 309.130 379,810 440,367 60,557 159
UBI Tax- 360, 1 80 393.047 388,747 382,469 373,313 535, 152 527,593 (7,559) -1.4
eh Lie Feesh 142.506 147,960 141,187 135,631 151,066 1 99, 222 210,061 10,839 5.4°
Total 1,481,423 1,644.529 1,592,024 1,405,235 i 1,404,078 , 1,638,231 1,793,863 155,632 1.5%
ÇMnge from prior y.... 031.1% 1z.5." .J.Z'IIo '11.~: -G.1%' 111."'" '0.1." nla nI
. Repr..- ...nth~ ""O""" pottom, (1990 - 1997110"" 199._"'" Budget
- - .._.. fo<Mey 1088... ........ ..-""""A.
..
4.(;,.
City of Federal Way
May 1&98 Monthly Financial Report
.
Equalization is exceeding estimated revenues ($44,567) by $48,323 or 108.4%.
.
Local criminal justice sales tax to date of $440,367 is exceeding the estimated revenues ($379,810) by
$60,557 or 15.9%.
.
Fuel taxes are lower than budgetary projections through April by $7,559 or 1.4% and vehicle license fees
are exceeding projections by $10,839 or 5.4%.
G ra D h 8
CVeh Lic Fees
5 TAT E -5 H ARE D REV E N U E 5
1993-1998
.Liquor
$1,800,000
$1,600,000
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000 ~
$- '
.Fuel Tax
CCriminal
Justice
CEqualization
~
~
II)
C1>
C1>
¡ß
C1>
....
C1>
C1>
Q.
'0
«
cO
C1>
C1>
ü
«
m
C1>
mMVET
Utility Taxes
Table 6 summarizes utility tax revenue collections.
Through April utility tax collections total $1,729,300 which is $83,404 or 5.1% above the monthly budget
estimate ($1,645,896). This reflects the 5.0% rate which was effective 3/1/97. Since we have only had this
revenue source for one year, it is difficult to project the monthly estimates.
TABLE 6
UTiUTY TAXES
Year.to-date (thru April)
Revised YTD 1998 Budget
Budget Budget Actual $ Variance "Variance
Electric (Puget Power) $ 1,753,100 $ 718,129 721,228 $ 3,099 0.4%
Gas (Puget Sound Energy) 572,400 308,161 271,201 (36,960) -12.0%
Garbage (FIN Disposal) 299,700 84,354 99,522 15,168 18.0%
Cable (Viacom & TCI) 342,000 112,130 146,457 34,327 30.6%
Phone 803,400 255,885 318,717 62,832 24.6%
Storm Drainage 134,500 69,282 47,503 (21,779) -31.4%
Cellular 313,200 95,210 121,129 25,919 27.2%
Pagers & Internet 8,700 2,745 3,543 798 29.1%
Total $ 4,227,000 $ 1,645,896 $ 1,729,300 $ 83,404 5.1%
4--6,.
II
City of Federal Way
May 1!1:Jrd Monthly Financial Report
Building Permit and Plan Check Activity
Graph 9 and Table 7 illustrate building permit I zoning fee I plan review fee activity between 1991 and 1998.
!ì..L.!.R.IL!
PERMIT/ZONING/PLAN CHECK FEES
Through May
$400,000
sso,ooo
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
$350,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -$
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
J
J $150,000
$-
. Overall, Community Development permits and fees total $261,644 which is $71,079 or 21.4% below the
adopted budget estimate ($332,743).
. Compared with 1997 activities ($382,530), permit revenues and building fees have decreased $120,866 or
31,6%. Building permit applications are holding steady, but several are currently being reviewed by staff
or are waiting for a response from the applicant. We anticipate an increase in revenues once these
applications have been processed and permits have been issued.
. Building permit fee collections through May total $120,344 which is $41,880 or 25.8% below the adopted
budget estimate ($162,224).
. Electrical fees have been consistent with budgetary expectations. Collections total $34,802 which is
$5,301 or 13.2% below adopted budgetary estimates ($40,103).
. Zoning fees collected through May total $20,613 which is $28,239 or 57.8% below the adopted budget
estimate ($48,852).
. Plan check fees collected during the same period total $85,905 which is above the adopted budget
estimate ($81,564) by $4,342 or 5.3%.
. Sign code citation fee and sign code permit collections which through May total $4,189 are included with
zoning fees.
4-G.
.
City of Federal Way
May 1998 Monthly Financial Report
TABLE 7
BUILDING PERMITS/ZONING FEES/PLAN CHECK FEES
1993. 1998
1993 \ 1994 1995 199/1 1997 1998 1998 Budget
Revenue Actual Actuel Actuel Actual Actuel Budget Actual S Verlence S Varlence
January $ 33,708 $ 36,051 $ 48,383 $ 26,306 $ 59,933 $ 51,292 $ 55,439 $ 4,147 8.1%
February 39,795 47,671 34,376 44,823 81,164 62,058 33,657 (28,401) -45.8%
March 61,117 52,296 30,950 48,297 95,791 77,879 46,504 (31,375) -40.3%
April 61,936 63,273 36,508 51,060 93,260 69,397 63,166 (6,231) -9.0%
May 61,353 53,636 65,038 50,280 52,379 72,117 62,898 (9,219) -12.8%
June 56,643 39,732 69,015 65,217 57,030 78,766 . 0.0%
July 50,760 36,428 60,208 64,655 SO,O09 63,850 . . 0.0%
August 46,091 42,525 71,299 60,072 56,711 60,804 . - 0.0%
September 55,870 67,062 58,683 37,509 61,053 70,420 . . 0.0%
October 59,489 38,435 60,354 42,402 47,776 58,736 - . 0.0%
November 55,740 70,370 43,435 45,163 32,185 56,403 . . 0.0%
December 57,415 49,954 81,867 49,613 47,978 65,300 . . 0.0%
Total S 639,917 ¡ S 597,433 S 660,116 S 585,397 S 735,269 S 787,022 S 261,664 $ (71,079) -21.4%
Exp thru April 714,609 631,968 690,689 749,383 931,470 895,530 887,511 na na
Recovery Ratio 36.1% 40.0% 31.2% 29.5% 41.1% 37.2% 29.5% na na
YTD Recovery Ratio 39.4% 41.6% 39.0% 34.0% 35.7% 37.8% na na na
.
Building permit related revenues have recovered 29.5% of Community Development operating
expenditures which total $887,511,
Table 8 presents a synopsis of building permit activity in May for new construction between 1993 and 1998. At
the time this report was produced, information for May of 1998 was not available.
TABLE 8
BUILDING ACTIVITY - NEW CONSTRUCTION
Thru May
Permit Type 1993 1- 1995 1996 1997 1999
Residential 69 S 11,141,840 88 S 14,661,041 44 S 6,987,557 57 S 10,419,587 84 S 12,139,938 32 S 5.512.664
--- - ------- _._--'--~-~-=- --'--'~T74,7~-10~-
CommerCIa' 4 1.689.783 -7------S:-29S:353 7 - 6,582.594 3 2.412,564 4 3,751,607
Multi-family 2 522,564 4 10.680,548
Public 3 7.524,134 1 241,000 -, --
Mobile Homes 9 66,669 13 111.955 15 135.706 6 41.952 3 24,240 9 67.276
"hInge from prior yr 85 S 20,422,426 111 $ 20,834,913 66 $ 13,705,857 66 S 13,236,262 81 $ 25,257,290 45 r S 9,331,547
J.I- 6 .
..
City of Federal Way
May 1998 Monthly Financial Report
GENERAL FUND
District Court Activity
District Court filing fees for 1998 are $19.75 for each traffic infraction and $71.61 for all citations filed. In cases
where bailor penalty is paid or forfeited, the filing fee is reduced to $3.36.
Graph 10 compares district court expenditures and number of cases filed through May between 1992 and
1998. Table 9 presents a monthly trend of municipal court revenues and expenditures between 1994 and
1998.
GrlDh 10
Court Costs vs Num bar of Filings
T h ro ugh M. Y
i
u
1:
::J
0
U
S220,000
S200,000
S 1 80,000
S160,000
S140,000
S120,000
S100,000
S80.000
S60,000
S40,000
S20,000
S-
4,888
4,781
4,658
6,500
6,000
5,500
5,000
4,500 ..
...
4,000 ,§
¡¡:
3,500 '!;
3,000 !
2,500 E
::J
2,000 z
1,500
1,000
500
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
_Court Costs _Number 01 Filings
.
For the month of May, fines & forfeiture collections total $343,679 which is $76,543 or 28.7% above the
monthly estimated revenue ($267,136).
.
Overall, Criminal Legal Service expenditures total $436,600 which is $18,155 or 4.0% below the monthly
estimated budget ($454,755).
Because invoice processing for district court services is currently lagging one month, the table below and
attached financials reflect an expenditure accrual for May district court services.
4
TABLE 9
CRIMINAL LEGAL SERVICES
Through May
Sources! 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Uses Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Actual $ Variance % Variance
Revenues
Fines & Forfeitures $ 236,841 $ 234,415 $ 260,334 $ 254,979 $ 267,136 $ 343,679 $ 76,543 28.7%
Expenditures
District Court 100,718 102,871 121,099 130,547 179,075 179,075 - 0.0%
Witness Fees 4,768 3,462 5,866 2,903 6,052 4,935 1,117 18.5%
Administrative 60,162 69,258 78,567 83,387 127,216 134,290 (7,075) -5.6%
Public Defense 81,623 80,426 82,045 73,421 132,819 106,955 25,864 19.5%
Interpreter/Screener 1,329 2,743 7,068 8,051 9,593 11,345 (1,752) -18.3%
Total $ 248,600 $ 258,760 $ 294,645 $ 298,309 $ 454,755 $ 436,600 $ 18,155 4.0%
Rev Over (Under) Exp (11,759) (24,345) (34,311) (43,330) (187,619) (92,921) 94,698 n/a
Cases Filed 4,869 4,791 4,658 4,867 - 6,103 nIB nIB
1&1
4-E¡,
City of Federal Way
May 1998 Monthly Financial Report
Public Safety - Law Enforcement and Jail Services
Graph 11 compares jail service expenditures and number of bookings filed between 1993 and 1998. Booking
costs are associated with registering a prisoner, while maintenance costs reflect expenditures for daily meals
and shelter of prisoners. In addition, King County will assess a 10% fee for investigative work. The city was
also contracting with Kent for some jail services during 1997, but does not anticipate the need to employ them
in 1998.
Graph 11
$400,000
$350,000
$300,000
J! $250,000
'"
/3 $200,000
¡;;
.., $150,000
$100,000
$50,000
Jail Costs vs Bookings & Maintenance
Through May
$-
1998
1992
1993
1995
1996
1997
7,000
6,000
II>
5,000 g
III
C
4 ,000 ~
¡;;
:IE
3,000011
'"
g)
2,000 ~
0
0
1,000 CD
.
Through May, jail service expenditures (including an accrued estimate for April and May) total $331.291.
1994
_Expenditures
--Cases
Table 10 presents public safety expenditures between 1994 and 1998. Overall, the 1998 police budget totals
$11,646,882 which includes $995,712 for emergency dispatch and $857,700 for jail services.
.
Total Public Safety expenditures through May total $4,905,598 which is $79,606 or 1.6% below the monthly
estimate of $4,985,204.
Thru Mav, 1998
Actual $V81Iwx» I" v81Iwx»
Sources!
Uses
1994 ! 1995
Actual ; Actual
TABLE 10
PUBUC SAFETY
Throuah Mav
1996 I 1997 I
Actual Actual I BUdQet
- $
897,597
97,821
761,555
222,523
68,661
1,947,104
183,839
4,179,100
395,207
331,291
$ 4,905,598 $
Police - KC Contract
Administration
Support Services
Investigations
Records
Field Operations
r~~
Patrol
Traffic
Subtotal Law Enforcement
CoITYT1. & Dispatch
Jail Services
Total Public Safety
$3,426,018 $3,345,463 $ 3,370,160 $ - $ - $
47,024. 102,344 161,450 3,588,464 1,057,813
- - - ' - 82,739
- - -I - 641,768
- I - - I - I 223,349
- - - - ~~
- j -f 1,989,112
- - 165,187
3,473,042 3,447,807 3,531,610 3,588,464 4,223,054
- - - , 387,032 414,880
299,484 227,381 260,828 399,476 347,270
$3,772,526 $3,675,188 $ 3,792,438 $ 4,374,972 ¡ $ 4,985,204
160,216!
(15,083)
(119,787)
826
(5,575)
42,008
(18,652)
43,954
19,673
15,979
79,606 I
-
nIa
15.1%
-18.2%
nIa
nIa
nIa
nIa
nIa
nI.
4.7%
4.6%
1.6%
4~.
m
City of Federal Way
MaY,)":r98 Monthly Financial Report
Public Safety Cost Comparison - King County Contract
The following chart and graph depicts a comparison of our Public Safety Department with contracting for
services from 1990 to 1998. This comparison is based on net operating costs (after deducting revenues) and
some assumptions as noted in the graph.
11.00
8.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10.00
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,
1
9.00
6.00
¡
-- ------1
¡
!
¡
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I
1
---- ---------------------------------------------------J
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I
, -+- Not Cost - City Police
[)opt
--- Not Costs 'II King
County
7.00
5.00
4.00
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1990 II) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 I» 1996 1997 I'lt.. 1998 (4, 1998 thru Ma\
Expenditures:
Police Contract 5.115,407 6,485,651 6,326.511 7,639,959 8.224,500 8,088,384 6.364,608 5,806 1.831 -
Other Police Services - 909 7,351 5.899 10.701 186,354 2,327.540 8,339,380 9,266.609 4.510.391
Valley Communications - - - 180,758 981,572 995.712 395,207
Total Expenditures 5,115,407 6,486,560 6,333,862 7,645,858 8,235,201 8,274,738 8,872,905 9,326,758 10,264,152 4,905,598
Revenues:
Criminal Justice-High Crime - - . 245,781 272,395 251,666 266.550 292.237 240,000 73.376
Criminal Justice-low Pop 238,715 162.241 142,785 149,987 44.508 178,918 131,623 128,467 103.324 31,620
Criminal Justice-Contracted Svc . - . - 266,106 205.309 213,960 . - -
Copies, Photos, Fingerprints, Permits - - . - . . 5.340 25,937 25,000 10,934
Police Security . - . - - - 12,500 55,992 50,000 27.073
Grants - - . - - - - 812,429 632,658 370,915
State Seizures - - . . . - - 149,667 1 00, 000 16,522
Interest & Miscellaneous - - - - - - 209 6,613 7,500 1.666
Total Revenues 238,715 162,241 142,785 395,769 583,009 635,893 630,182 1,471,342 1,158,482 532,108
Net Cost. City Police Dept 4,876,692 6,324,319 6,1111,077 7,250,090 7,652,192 7,638,845 8,242,723 7,855,416 9,105,670 4,373,490
King County Contract Estimate 5,115,407 6.486,560 6,333,862 7,645,858 8,235,201 8,754,018 9,368,135 10,046,598 10,713,993 4,464,164
Revenues:
Criminal Justice-High Crime - . - 245,781 272,395 251,666 266,550 292,237 240,000 100,000
Criminal Justice-Low Pop 238,715 162,241 142,785 149,987 44,508 178,918 131,623 128,467 103,324 43,052
Criminal Justice-Contracted Svc (5) - - - - 266,106 205,309 213,960 218,239 222,604 92,752
Toral Revenues 238,715 182,241 142,785 395,789 583,009 835,893 812,133 638,943 565,928 235,803
Net Costa wi King County 4,878,692 6,324,319 6,191,077 7,250,090 7,852,192 8,118,125 8,756,002 9,407,655 10,148,065 4,228,380
Notel:
(') '000 Io.n ......- .mount COy",..., 0"""'""".n... YO"
(2) """" County........ ...-................ - """""'- .............. - boon.....' "" ........n ""
(') '007.........._.......................,...,......",/97......__............""'007",-"" ...."",...,.....,...
(4) '89" "" "'. County co"""'.n"""" .... on'" .... c....,...- -, City.mount,..... on ,... -'
(5) ,..,.,... _100'- ...- .MOI. ..ve.... .-..... .... on'" priG, YO" .mount -. ~ .....M
.
4().
City of Federal Way
May., :198 Monthly Financial Report
Recreation and Cultural Service Programs and Dumas Bay Centre Peñormance
Table 11 summarizes recreation and cultural service and Dumas Bay Centre activity and their related recovery
rates.
.
Recreation and cultural services: Revenues total $182,917 or 40.1 % of the revised budget ($456,514).
Direct program expenditures total $210,805 or 31.7% of the revised budget ($664,134). Recreation fees
have recovered 86.8% of direct program costs. Including administrative expenditures totaling $143,288, the
overall recovery ratio is 51.7%. The 1998 budgeted recovery rate is 42.5%.
.
Dumas Bay Centre: Operating revenues, total $130,829 or 40.9% of the adopted budget ($319,780). In
1997 the Dumas Bay Centre implemented a Facilities Booking Program which records revenues on an
accrual basis. In the past revenues were recorded on a cash basis. Through May unearned revenues
relating to 1998 and 1999 activities were $47,885 and $8,981 respectively, which would bring cash basis
revenues collected through May to $178,714 or 55.9% of the revised budget. Operating expenditures total
$160,317 or 42.3% (excluding one time costs) of the revised budget ($379,107). The Dumas Bay Centre
has recovered 81.6% of all operating costs when unearned revenues are not considered. When unearned
revenues are considered, the recovery rate is increased to 111.48%.
TABLE 11
RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND DUMAS SAY CENTRE PERFORMANCE
Through May 1998
Revenues Expenditures I Recovery Ratio %
Program Budget Actual I % Budget T Actual 1 % I Budget I Actual
A THLETICS AND SPECIALIZED SERVICES
Community Center 26,500 8,398 31.7% 87,247 24,160 27.7% 30.4% 34.8%
Senior Services 54,549 18,725 34.3% 66,939 27,475 41.0% 81.5% 68.2%
Special Populations 9,715 5,382 55.4% 47,032 21,361 45.4% 20.7% 25.2%
Youth Commission 500 - 0.0% 2,300 733 31.9% 21.7% n/a
Adult Athletics 135,500 75,681 55.9% 110,279 38,547 35.0% 122.9% 196.3%
Youth Athletics 57,400 14,199 24.7% 79,789 16,410 20.6% 71.9% 86.5%
Aquatics 2,500 - 0.0% 31,910 430 1.3% 7.8% n/a
Subtotal $ 286,664 $ 122,385 42.7% $ 425,496 $ 129,116 30.3% 67.4% 94.8%
Administration - - n/a 216,270 67,715 31.3% n/a n/a
Total $ 286,664 $ 122,385 42.7% $ 641,766 $ 196,832 30.7% 44.7% 62.2%
COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL SERVICES
Arts & Special Events 30,600 10,669 34.9% 47,107 22,610 48.0% 65.0% 47.2%
Community Recreation 123,800 46,854 37.8% 159,031 57,446 36.1% 77.8% 81.6%
Red, White & Blue 15,450 3,009 19.5% 32,500 1,633 5.0% 47.5% 184.2%
Subtotal $ 169,850 $ 60,532 35.6% $ 238,638 $ 81,689 34.2% 71.2% 74.1%
Administration - - n/a 187,651 75,573 40.3% n/a n/a
Total $ 169,850 $ 60,532 35.6% $ 426,289 $ 157,262 36.9% 39.8% 38.5%
I TOTAL RECREATION
1$ 456,5141 $ 182,9171 40.1"/01 $ 1,068,055! $
354,094 I
33.2%1
42.5%1
51.7%1
Dumas Bay Centre 319,780 130,829 40.9% 379,107 160,317 42.3% 84.4% 81.6%
P3 - - n/a 19,004 19,004 100.0% n/a n/a
Arts Commission - 3,653 n/a 105,255 33,825 32.1% n/a 10.8%
GRAND TOTAL $ 776,294 $ 317,399 40.9% $ 1,571,421 $ 567,240 36.1% 49.4% 56.0%
m
4-~.
City of Federal Way
Mal' , ~98 Monthly Financial Report
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Community Development Block Grant Fund
"
. The CDBG Fund accounts for the receipt and disbursement of federal grants received through the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD awarded the City a total of $599,149 in 1998.
CDBG 1998 adopted budget totals $47,897 (excluding projects managed by KC) of which $32,165 or
67.1% has been expended through the end of May.
TABLE 12
caIM.NTY DEVELOPNI!!NT BLOCK GRANTS
Lifø.tr>.DIIœ Expendtues
VB" : Prog Income
Progam NIoœtIJon: 1994 1995 1996 19!1T 1998 J ~ ! BIlIBnœ
ConsortiLm FU1ds - Irdrect Federal GranIs
a:83 1994 372,554 (88,425) (202,020) (:m) (81,807) -
a:83 1995 300,402 (00,718) (100,791) (144,338) 44,800 9,361
a:83 1996 219,943 (92,849) (127,094) -
a:831997 375,956 (294,974) (36,144) 44, 838
a:83 1998 241,598 (32,165) 209,433
&btotaI $ 2,597,453 $(272,442) $(440,777) $(200,320) $(294,974) $(176,503) $ (163,238) $ (17,372) $ 263, 632
PROJECTS MANAGED BY KING COl.MY
Food Ben< V\9rehouse - 94 70,00) (56,731) (11,889) (1,380) -
KC t-bJsirg Rehab - 94 26,804 (26,804) -
Easter Seal Sodety - 95 19,300 (9,653) (7, S64) (1,789) -
Blildrg LN'ade - 95 20,00) (10,00) (9,879) (121) -
Tlël'lSitiooal t-bJsirg - 95 29,500 (24,008) (4,692) -
Blildrg Rero.iation - 95 31,500 (13,450), (13,380) 4,670
Roof ReP aœ - 95 8,500 (4,250) (4,250) -
Shelter for I-breIess - 95 50,00) (25,000) (19,385) 5,615
KC I-b.Jsirg Rehab - 95 125,00) (125,00) -
Easter Seal Sodety - 96 19,336 (18,986) (350) -
Shelter for HoræIss - 96 150,00) (134,000) (13,245) (2,755) -
Hg-4ine Cdlege - 96 ~,148 ~,148
KC t-bJsirg Rehab - 96 170,000 (140,100) (29,894) -
KC I-b.Jsirg Rehab - 97 170,00) (144,508) 25,492
AIDS I-b.Jsirg - 97 10,00) 10,00)
Easter Seal Sodety - ff1 18,250 (18,000) (250) -
I-b.Jsirg ÞUtøity - 97 25,00) (25,00) -
Merta! Health t-bJsirg - 97 11,183 (11,183) -
tbresiltt - ff1 100,000 100,000
OlaIlerge Qa1 - 97 50,000 (46,00) 4, 00)
Uited Cerebral Palsy - 97 15,00) 15,00)
Easter Seal Sodety - 98 18,989 18,989
tbresiltt - 98 75,00) 75,00)
EIcIert-eath Corred - 98 10,00) 10,00)
Tlël'lSitionall-b.Jsirg - 98 50,00) 50,00)
KC I-b.Jsirg Rehab - 98 170,00) 170,00)
KC I-b.Jsirg ÞUhaity - 98 8,400 8,400
KC I-b.Jsirg ÞUtøity - 98 10,00) 10,00)
KC I-b.Jsirg ÞUhaity - 98 40 ,00) 40,00)
Qíreach Alive 20 ,00) 20,00)
&btaIaI $ 1,551,916 $ . $(119,084) $(511,543) $(312,638) $ . $ . $ (11,337) $ 597,314
TCIIaI $ 4, 149,369 $(272,442) $(559,861) $(711,863) $(607,612) $(176,503) $(163,238) $ (28,709) $ 860,946
-
%.
City of Federal Way
May 1998 Monthly Financial Report
Public Works - Contracted Services
. Table 13 presents a year-to-date analysis of the Public Works and Surface Water Management (SWM)
contracts with King County, WSDOT and private vendors. Expenditure accruals have been made for May
activity. Most on-going maintenance takes place during the spring and summer months.
TABLE 13
PUBUC WORKS - CONTRACTED SERVICES
Expenditures
Program Budget Actual "
Expedited Plan Review (1) $ 25,000 $ 8,361 33.4%
Contracted Plan Review (1) 12,870 32,430 252.0%
Subtotal .Development Services $ 37,870 $ 40,791 107.7%
Neighborhood Safety (1) 10,000 29,634 296.3%
T rafficfT ra nsportation 10,000 13,377 133.ã%
Traffic Maintenance - KC 350,050 116,857 33.4%
Sutotal TrafftcServlces $ 370,050 $ 159,869 43.2%
Street Maintenance - Private Contractors (2) 707,225 242,918 34.3%
Street Maintenance - WSDOT 85,036 36,376 42.8%
Structure Maintenance (3) 119,367 - 0.0%
Subtotal Street Systems $ 911,628 $ 279,293 30.6%
Solid Waste Litter Control 45,100 18,980 42.1%
Subtotal Solid Waste .. $ 45,100 $ 18,980 42.1%
Water Utility Billing - KC 60,000 30,587 51.0%
State Highway Maintenance - WSDOT 42,500 7,217 17.0%
Water Analysis (1) 20,000 472 2.4%
Str. Sweeping, Catch Basin, Manhole & Pipes (1) 253,400 24,083 9.5%
Total Surface Water Management $ 375,900 $ 62,358 16.6%
Snow & Ice Removal (1) 30,000 4,079 13.6%
Snow & Ice Removal - Lakehaven Utility District 10,000 8,286 82.9%
Subtotal Snow & Ice Removal $ 40,000 $ 12,364 30.9%
Total Contractual Services $ 1,780,548 $ 573,655 32.2%
(1) Private Contractors
(2) Private Contracts for street maintenance ($470,292), supplies ($37,000), RNoJ vegetation mowing and tree maintenance ($93,200),
Weyerhaeuser ($26,233), and Pavement Management System ($14,000).
(3) Private contractors for sidewalk, ramps, curb and gutter maintenance ($83,696) and fences, guardrail, barriers and retaining wall
maintenance ($6,671).
CAPITAL PROJECTS UPDA TE
CIP - City Facilities accounts for the Public Safety and Downtown Revitalization capital projects funded with
the 1997 GO Bonds. CIP - Parks accounts for the acquisition or construction of major park capital facilities
except those facilities financed by proprietary funds. CIP - SWM accounts for major capital facilities associated
with managing the existing storm water conveyance systems, regulating the clearing, grading and erosion
control phases of new land development, constructing, maintaining and repairing elements of the City's
drainage system, and controlling water quality within the system. CIP - Traffic accounts for improvements to
existing traffic signals and new signalization. CIP - Streets accounts for improvements of roadways and
arterials, including the construction of new street sections, the purchase of right-of-ways, the widening of
roadways to provide additional vehicle lanes, and the installation of sidewalks and landscaping.
Funding sources include transfers from the SWM Fund ($1,625,223), General Fund ($75,000) and Street CIP
Fund ($86,662); interest earnings ($75,000); and beginning fund balance ($1,925,178). Table 14 represents
year-to-date expenditures through May 1998. Llfe-to-date impact fees collected through May 1998 total
$1,884.946 which includes interest earnings. Currently, a balance of $159,539 is reserved for Parks, Traffic,
Street and SWM capital improvements projects.
-
4-~ .
City of Federal Way
Ma) .998 Monthly Financial Report
PROJECT UPDA TE
City Facilities: 1) Downtown Revitalization: S. 320th Street Downtown Core and Frame Improvements,
design concepts for; landscape planters, street tree locations, street lights, pedestrian lights, bus shelters and
sidewalks were presented at the April 6, 1998 LUTC for 3, 5, and 7 lane Streets. Based on discussion and
input received at the meeting a recommended set of City Center Design Standards were developed and
presented at the April 21, 1998 Council meeting for adoption, where they were referred back to LUTC
Committee. The standards were taken back to Council on May 5, 1998 and were discussed and approved.
Parks: 1) Dumas Bay Civic Theatre: All exterior and interior walls framed, installation of fire protection
system, began installation of interior dry wall, wiring and doors; 2) Dumas Bay Centre Parking Lot Addition:
Installation of new parking lot lights, power transformer, fire protection and water service; 3) Community and
Neighborhood Parks projects are: Lake Killarney Master Plan: SEPA/Environmental check list completed,
construction scheduled for Summer 1998; Lake Grove School Ball Field Renovation: Project completed;
Heritage Woods Park Project completed; Mark Twain Ball Field Renovation: Project completed; 4) BPA
Phase II: Completed; 5) BPA Phase III: Parametric Engineering has been selected for design, design and
survey has begun, the design phase should be complete December 1998. Open house to be held 5/27/98 at
City Hall; 6) Celebration Park: Wetland mitigation work continuing within the BPA Phase I corridor.
SWM: 1) Culvert Upgrade and the SeaTac Mall Detention projects Phase I are designed and property
acquisition is nearly complete. Project construction is scheduled to start June 1998; 2) S 356th Regional
Storage Facility construction was completed in November 1997. Contractor is working on punch list items and
will be going to Council in June 1998 for acceptance; 3) CIP studies Phase II is underway; 4) Work for
SeaTac Mall Phase II design has begun. 85% design completion to Council is anticipated for August 1998. 5)
SW 340th Regional Storage Facility design is complete and property acquisition is being finalized. Project
construction is scheduled to start in June, 1998; 6) Starlake Road/S 272nd Conveyance Improvement has
begun design, 85% design completion to Council is anticipated for July, 1998; 7) Annual Programs: Mi"or
Lake Hydraulic Analysis Study was completed, proposed improvement has been incorporated into the SWM
facility plan which is currently under review. Crown Point Storm Line Replacement is under design and
construction will start in July, 1998. Emergency repair work was completed in April, 1998. Joe's Creek Water
Quality Monitoring Facility will commence construction in July of 1998.
StreetITraffic: 1) The design contract with HLA Engineers is complete for S. Star Lake Road and Military Road
S. signal and the design has started. The survey is complete and the consultant has completed design plans,
100% of design approved at 6/2/98 Council Meeting; 2) SW 340th St and Hoyt Road SW signal project, Inca
Engineers have completed 30% design plans which were reviewed by Public Works and were approved at the
5/19/98 Council Meeting; 3) SW 334th Street and 21st Ave SW signal the scope of work for the contract is
under negotiation with Parametrix, property acquired on 2 of 3 parcels; 4) S 356th-SR 99 to 1st Ave project is
under final design; working with Parks on the wetland mitigation; right of way acquisition for the PSE parcel is
complete and working with Legal on the purchase and sale; 5) 23rd Ave S project (S 317th to S 324th) We have
obtained WSDOT to provide Right of Way acquisition services for this project and they have just started
appraisals; 6) S 312th St-SR 99 to 23rd Ave S project Of the 27 parcels, 26 are complete. Approved by
Committee and Council for final design and authorization to bid; 7) SR-99 and S 320th Street Intersection
Improvements negotiating scope of work and waiting for ISTEA obligation; 8) The SW 336th Street (from 21 st to
26th) Project is final; 9) 8th Ave SWand SW Dash Point Road Traffic Signal design is complete and the
appeal was denied regarding SEPA. Working with the WSDOT on concerns they have; 10) 14th Avenue SW
Sidewalk Improvements from SW 312th Street to Jr. High currently under design, 100% plans approved at
6/16/98 LUTC; 11) SR-99 Improvements from S 312th Street to S 324th Street negotiating scope of work and
waiting for ISTEA obligation; 12) The 100% Design Plans and authorization to acquire right of way was
approved by Council on 6/2/98 for the S. 304th Street and Military Road Signal Project. The Open House was
held at City Hall on 4/15/98, all comments were positive.
"
4-~.
-
City of Federal Way
May 1998 Monthly Financial Report
TABLE 14
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1198 1198 ExptHrdituru "of
Pmgram RevIsed Bdgt P#JInned Actual Planned
CIP .1997 GO Bonds
101 Public Safety 4,805,207 - - nI~
102 Downtown Rev~aljzation 2,669,813 2,669,813 136,962 5.1%
104 Opportunity Fund 33 ,883 - nI~
TOIIIl ClP .1197 GO Bonds $ 7""'1103 $ 2,1169,813 $ 138,962 11.1"
CIP . PARCS
101 Open Space Projects 249,706 249,706 - 0.0%
108 School Site Improvements 19,277 19,277 6,836 35.5°Æ
112 Neighborhood Pari<s 87,692 87,692 2,471 2.8%
114 Celebration Pari< 7,919,260 7,919,260 1,146,936 14.5%
.-
115 Klahanee Lake Commun~ylSenior Center 28,247 28,247 1,018 3.6%
116 Steel Lake Improvements 40 , 000 40 ,000 29,073 72.7%
117 Celebration Pari< Contingency 250,000 250,000 0.0%
119 BPATrailPhaseli1 249,242 249,242 7,160 2.9%
124 Skateboard Pari< 15,727 15,727 179 1.1%
Total ClP . Paries $ 8,859,1111 $ 8,8119,151 $ 1,193,873 13.5%
CIP . SWM
111 Small Capital Projects 366,769 366,769 68,852 17.8%
210 Panther Lake 11,502 3,000 - °c~
--
213 SeaTac Mall Detention 3,436,648 1,850,000 98,275 ~~
215 34Oth St Regional Storm Detention 1,017,852 1,017,852 60,291 5.9%
220 336th Kitts Comer 42,954 20 ,000 2,476 12.4%
230 Starlake RoadlS 272nd Conveyance 64,164 64,164 622 1.0%
240 S 356th Regional Storage 563,224 387,847 347,214 89.5%
310 CIP Studies 54,535 54,535 O.OOÆ
Total ClP . SWM $ 11,1177,648 $ 3,784,167 $ 517,730 111.3%
CIP . Traffic
104 SR99 Signal 288th to 3O4th 10,031 10,031 . 0.0%
106 21st Avenue @ SW 325th Signal 105,770 105,770 12,868 122%
108 Dash Point Rd. @ 8th Avenue SW 279,719 279,719 32,097 11.5%
109 Dash Point Rd @ 21st Avenue SW 82 ,304 82,304 12,422 15c~
111 Non-motorized CIP Projects 12,990 12,990 - 0.0%
113 S 336th @ SR99 - Const RHTL 502,886 502,886 18,161 3.6%
114 Military Rd & Star Lake Signal 180,776 180,776 11,817 6.5%
115 SW Campus Dr. Traffic Sig Coord 152,620 152,620 0,0%
Total ClP . Traffic $ . 1,327,096 $ 1,327,096 $ 87,365 1.6"
CIP . Streets
102 S 356thlSR99 to 1st Ave, 494,593 65,000 4,685 7.2°Æ
106 SW5 336th @ 21 st to 27th Ave SW 782,547 782,547 593,315 75.8%
109 317th - 326th, 23rd Ave. 5 1,021,377 1,021,377 11,133 1,1%
112 S 348thll-5 to SR99 26 , 000 26 ,000 - 0.0%
113 312th StJSR99 . 23rd Ave. 1,672,793 1,672,793 41,605 2,5%
115 Military Rd. S.I286th to 3O4th Ave 748,376 746,376 17,943 2.4%
121 373rd Hylebos Bridge Rehab 10,824 10,824 0.0%
122 S 32Oth 5t & SR99 173,968 173,968 1,161 0.7%
123 21st Ave 5W & SW 334th St Pad 179,337 179,337 649 0,4%
124SW312thSt & 14thAveSWPed 60 , 000 60 ,000 - 0,0%
125 SW34Oth St & Hoyt Rd 58,191 58,191 41,366 71.1%
126 SR 99 Imp- S 312th to S 324th 109,312 109,312 258 0.2%
TotaICiP . Streets $ 5,337,318 $ 4107,725 $ 712,335 14.5%
Dum.. Bay Centre
Deferred Maintenance 21,521 21,521 107 0.5%
102 Civic Theatre 1,731,700 1,731,700 1,100,225 63.5%
105 Parl<ing Lot 139,709 139,709 146,271 104.7%
10111l Dumas Bay $ . 1,892,830 $ 1,882,830 $ 1,246,603 65.8%
Overlay Program 2,295,401 2,295,401 93,522 4.1%
Total Other CapItal Projects $ 2,285AO1 $ 2,2911,401 $ 83,522 <4.1"-
CIP Grand Total $ 32,798,447 $ 211,736,283 $ 4,048, 181 111.7%
46.
-
City of Federal Way
May,998 Monthly Financial Report
OTHER STATISTICS
Cash and Investments
. Total invested balance at the end of May is $46,684,727 which includes $22,701,598 in the State
Investment Pool (SIP). The State Investment Pool securities consisted of Repurchase Agreements
(34.97%), U.S. Agency Securities (50.42%), U.S. Treasury Securities (3.30%), and Certificates of Deposit
(.92%) and Commercial Paper (10.393%).
. The average maturity of securities in the portfolio was 123 days.
.
May's average portfolio net earnings rate was 5.67%, which is an decrease of .08% from the previous
month.
. The travel advance account, petty cash/change funds, and investigative funds are $5,000, $3,450, and
$4,579 respectively.
Per policy, the basis used by the City to determine whether market yields are being achieved shall be the range
between the average six-month U.S. Treasury Bill (5.36%) and the State Investment Pool (5.46%). Table 15
summarizes investment portfoli othrough May.
Table 15
INVESTMENTS
Settlement Investment Maturity Yield to
Type Date Par Amount Cost Date Maturity
Agency - FNMA 5/16/96 $ 1,000,000 $ 982,031 03/12/99 5.55%
Bankers Acceptance 2/11198 $ 1,000,000 $ 973,942 8/7/98 5.52%
Treasury Note 09/03/96 $ 1,000,000 $ 999,375 8/31/98 6.16%
Bankers Acceptance 4/30/98 $ 1,000,000 $ 974,697 10/16/98 5.61'1
Treasury Note 2/20/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 985,469 2/15/99 5.78% .
Treasury Note 4/2/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,001,641 4/30/99 6.41%
Treasury Note 4/30/98 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,008,633 4/30/99 5.60%
Agency - FNMA 6/4/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,011,094 7/13/98 5.94%
Treasury Note 6/4/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,003,594 7/31/98 5.92%
Certificate of Deposit 8/8/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 8/10/98 5.93%
Treasury Note 8/14/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,002,188 9/30/98 5.79%
Treasury Note 8/14/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,859 8/15/99 5.95%
FNMA 9/24/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,690 9/18/98 5.73%
FNMA 9/24/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,002,381 9/17/99 5.89%
FNMA 3/26/98 $ 1,000,000 $ 996,875 3/23/00 5.70%
Certificate of Deposit 3/26/98 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 3/25/99 5.68%
Certificate of Deposit 10/23/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 10/19/98 5.93%
FNMA 11/14/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,274 11/12/99 5.80%
Agency-FNMA 2/11198 $ 1,000,000 $ 999,180 2/9/99 5.47%
Certificate of Deposit 1/15/98 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 1/15/99 5.73%
Bankers Acceptance 5/29/98 $ 1,000,000 $ 979,412 10/13/98 5.60%
Treasury Note 5/29/98 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,007,656 5/15/99 5.43%
FHLB 5/22/97 $ 1,050,000 $ 1,050,483 5/21/99 6.27%
Treasury Note 5/29/97 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,002,656 5/15/99 6.23%
Average Maturity 238
Average Yield to Maturity 5.85%
Average Yield - 6 mo. T-Bill 5.36%
State Investment Pool $ 22,701,598 1 day 5.46%
Average Portfolio Maturity & Yield 123 5.67°/
Total Investments $ 46,684,727 .
'-fe;,
-
p Actuals 1998 Revised Budget Actuals Variance
Through Through Favorable (Unfavorable)
ces/Uses 1994 1995 1996 1997 Annual May May Dollars ($) Percent (%)
Beginning Fund Balance $ 12,181,738 $ 11,403,627 $ 10,331,541 $ 10,396,188 $ 15,128,343 $ 15,128,343 $ 15,128,343 $ - 0.0%
Operating Revenues
Property Taxes 2,868,535 2,888,348 3,563,580 3,147,880 6,410,094 3,545,735 3,545,735 - 0.0%
Sales Tax 3,180,931 3,282,518 3,473,861 3,438,985 8,469,131 3,543,414 3,554,515 11,101 0.3%
Criminal Justice Sales Tax 432,046 443,005 452,138 512,195 1,260,667 478,871 536,943 58,072 12.1%
Leasehold Excise Tax - - - 1,279 14,853 1,317 1,443 126 9.5%
State-Shared Revenues 1,773,736 1,701,982 1,523,696 1,608,649 4,469,217 1,653,428 1,656,708 3,280 0.2%
Real Estate Excise Tax 584,693 345,932 492,270 623,152 1,100,000 610,496 650,120 39,624 6.5%
Gambling Taxes 153,779 189,987 169,658 202,307 305,598 88,275 91,302 3,027 3.4%
Utility Taxes - - 230,894 1,093,527 4,227,186 1,939,631 2,021,528 81,897 4.2%
Fines & Forfeitures 236,841 234,415 260,334 254,979 662,224 267,136 343,679 76,543 28.7%
Building Permits/Fees-CD 252,927 215,255 220,766 382,530 787,112 332,743 261,664 (71,079) -21.4%
ROW Permits/Fees-PW 67,998 70,977 82,962 60,758 229,910 88,809 83,674 (5,135) -5.8%
Licenses 35,606 38,310 36,613 36,178 95,481 36,563 26,344 (10,219) -27.9%
Franchise Fees 181,099 186,359 198,457 220,978 420,179 204,339 227,464 23,125 11.3%
Recreation Fees 175,912 153,053 167,344 171,134 456,514 174,880 186,570 11,690 6.7%
Dumas Bay Centre 36,769 93,601 94,662 113,469 748,649 126,904 130,559 3,655 2.9%
Interest Eamings 207,606 164,234 193,074 193,978 918,284 237,420 299,124 61,704 26.0%
Admin Fee-SV\IM & Solid Waste - 62,660 64,540 67,806 165,989 69,162 69,162 (0) 0.0%
SV\IM Fees 808,686 768,187 1,029,681 1,412,747 2,943,429 1,264,248 1,264,248 - 0.0%
Refuse Collection Fees 62,155 62,070 60,648 60,407 146,329 61,554 61,159 (395) -0.6%
Police - - - 75,654 - - 56,234 56,234 nla
Grants 7,500 9,756 13,095 22,540 476,140 370,915 370,915 - 0.0%
Other 32,138 10,456 16,388 2,072 49,756 14,066 14,066 - 0.0%
Total Operating Revenues 11,098,957 10,921,105 I 12,344,661 13,703,204 34,356,742 15,109,907 15,453,156 343,249 2.3%
Operating Expenditures
City Council 102,878 97,504 97,156 105,252 192,955 109,098 109,489 (391) -0.4%
""". Manager 187,685 148,462 190,657 247,186 532,812 238,145 252,739 (14,594) -6.1%
gement Services 469,753 545,876 625,031 584,779 1,958,149 595,412 559,577 35,835 6.0%
., legal Services 125,759 157,673 183,844 224,806 489,468 194,314 202,477 (8,163) -4.2%
Criminal Legal Services 248,600 258,760 294,645 298,309 1,134,837 454,755 436,600 18,155 4.0%
Comm. Developement Services 1,494,342 1,534,440 1,114,739 1,112,553 2,810,070 1,048,584 1,091,518 (42,934) -4.1%
Police Services 3,473,042 3,447,807 3,531,610 3,975,496 10,789,182 4,637,934 4,574,307 63,627 1.4%
Jail Services 299,484 227,381 260,828 399,476 857,700 347,270 331,291 15,979 4.6%
Parks & Recreation 1,281,655 1,149,659 1,265,777 1,025,713 2,874,260 1,113,198 1,050,335 62,863 5.6%
Public Works 829,163 841,962 1,052,087 1,083,968 3,255,218 1,167,654 1,225,840 (58,186) -5.0%
City Overlay Program 234 - 127,067 43,373 2,295,401 93,522 93,522 - 0.0%
Snow & Ice Removal (1) - 23,838 38,551 50,537 54,738 28,825 28,825 0 0.0%
Solid Waste 51,042 52,274 80,727 163,441 295,914 85,143 92,152 (7,008) -8.2%
Surface Water Management 412,571 445,860 603,928 618,337 1,554,594 563,059 550,677 12,382 2.2%
Debt Service 1,101 2,006 3,123 (9,245) 4,411,190 2,184 2,184 - 0.0%
Dumas Bay Centre 78,586 107,425 128,546 162,344 401,228 156,030 160,425 (4,395) -2.8%
Non-departmental (2) 25,203 25,033 25,033 - 2,151,456 - - - nla
Total Operating Expenditures 9,081,098 9,065,960 9,623,349 10,086,325 36,059,171 10,835,126 10,761,956 73,170 0.7%
Operating Revenues over/(under)
Operating Expenditures 2,017,859 1,855,145 2,721,312 3,616,879 (1,702,429) 4,274,781 4,691,200 416,419 9.7%
Other Financing Sources - - - - 8,104,663 1,857,210 1,857,210 - 0.0%
Other Financing Uses 2,004,975 - - 551,953 11,755,528 1,436,529 1,436,529 - 0.0%
Ending Fund Balance
Solid Waste 111,484 188,505 213,050 296,991 370,089 - 259,659 nla nla
Snow & Ice - 191,274 103,239 73,358 100,000 - 73,052 nla nla
Arterial Street 1,563,848 971,893 362,100 470,902 - - 1,486,693 nla nla
Utility Tax - - - - 1,019,898 - 1,487,057 nla nla
SV\IM 2,016,324 1,702,890 1,077,666 1,566,522 840,139 - 1,805,326 nla nla
Path & Trails 29,109 39,284 50,210 6,153 12,907 - 7,699 nla nla
Strategic Reserve 2,150,560 2,104,645 2,050,477 2,022,389 2,000,000 - 2,019,573 nla nla
- -I)t Service 1,657,809 1,936,991 1,618,909 2,986,805 4,538,155 - 5,711,291 nla nla
IiIS Bay Centre 562,661 157,897 115,131 83,742 - - 39,739 nla nla
~ Ice - 1,031,439 - 1,082,207 583,861 - 748,150 nla nla
P3 - - - 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 nla nla
Interfund Loans 60,000 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 nla nla
Unreserved 4,042,827 4,923,954 7,462,071 4,562,045 (0) - 6,291,986 nla nla
Total Ending Fund Balance $ 12,194,622 $ 13,258,772 $ 13,052,853 $ 13,461,114 $ 9,775,049 $ 19,823,805 $ 20,240,224 $ 416,419 2.1%
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND USES
OPERATING FUNDS
Through May
1994 - 1998
Note 1. These expenditures occur pnmanly durIng the winter months.
Note 2: Includes contingency, unallocaled P3 and vision premiums.
L/--~. Ie¡
611819812:42 PM
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM#
JC{()
"""""'.""""""""""""""""""""""."'.""."""""""""'."................................",......................................................."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: Human Services Commission Appointment
............................................................................,........................................................................................................,.................
.........................................................."
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT: None
...x.. CONSENT
_ORDINANCE
_BUSINESS
_HEARING
_FYI
_RESOLUTION
_STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMA TION
_STUDY SESSION
_OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
"""""""""""""""""'.""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'."'"""""""""""""'."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".........................................".......................
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Memo to the Parks, Recreation, Public Safety and Human Services Committee dated June
... P.! }, ~~. ~ ;}J. M.~ p. ~ . ~. ~ ..~~. ~ ..9.~ Y.. S;g~. ~.~! .~ . ~ ~ ~~~ J ~ ~.~. 2 ?,}.~ ~ ~.;} 2 .:'?. !i ~.~ ..9. ~~ ~m .'. ~ ..~~.~. ~ g~. ~ ~.i. ~.~} ~.~~ ~ ~,.ß ~ ~ ~9}
~~. ~ ..~?. !..~ 2 ~:.....
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Brian Gammill resigned his position as Human Services Commissioner on June 8,
1998, leaving one vacancy on the commission. His tenD expires January 31, 1999. Currently, there are two
alternates appointed to serve until January 31. 2000. The alternates are Richard Bye and Michael Brummit. Mr. Bye
has actively participated in Commission meetings since he was appointed in February and has indicated an interest in
filling the position. Mr. Brummit attended one meeting in 1997 and has not indicated an interest in being appointed
...~~..~~~.P'?~!.~!g~:...~.~.~ŒE~~~~P.~~9.~..~P.P.~.~~.~P.~~~.~U~)~~~~.:'?y'~..~g..~~.~..~~E~!:I.~.P'.'?.~!.~!g~:........................................"..............................
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At their June 22, 1998 meeting, the Parks, Recreation,
Public Safety and Human Services Committee voted unanimously to appoint alternate Richard Bye to fill the vacant
'" P.~.~. ~~~ ~~.'..~~.! ~.~..~ ~ p'.i.~~~..'?!:1..!~~~~.. ~}.'...~.~.~2:.. ....................... ............. ......... ...................... ............ ..........". ..............
............................".. ..... ...... ......."
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Pii""'"tn,-" ~~'7:t.; ..-e.¿:C\o~~;Tt.~ '. /
..............................................................................,...............................................................................................................A«,,¡1..d
.L,.It-'~J""""""""""""
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: J]5)¿
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
_TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
G:\CLERK\AGENDA.BIL
Item 5E
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
Date:
June 12, 1998
Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager tt~
From:
Subject:
Human Services Commissioner Appointment
BackQround:
Brian Gammill resigned his position as Human Services Commissioner on June 8, 1998, leaving
one vacancy on the commission. His term expires January 31, 1999.
Currently, there are two alternates appointed to serve until January 31, 2000. The alternates are
Richard Bye and Michael Brummit. Mr. Bye has actively participated in Commission meetings since
he was appointed in February and has indicated an interest in filling the position. Mr. Brummit
attended one meeting in 1997 and has not indicated an interest in being appointed to the position.
Staff recommends appointment of Richard Bye to the vacant position.
Committee Recommendation:
Motion to appoint Richard Bye to fill the vacant position on the Human Services Commission which
expires on January 31, 1999. Forward the recommendation to the full City Council for approval on
July7,1998.
APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
~ -&"- . --
ommlttee Member
C
L/
"
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Councilmembers
FROM:
Chris Green, City Clerk
~
DATE:
June 9, 1998
S UBJEÇ1;
Human Services Commissioner Resignation
J
I have attached the resignation of Human Services Commissioner Brian Gamm.ip. There are
currently two alternates appointed to serve until January 31, 2000...those being Richard Bye and
Michael Brummit. Ann Guenther reported to me that Mr. Bye has been actively participating in
commission meetings and would be able to fill the vacancy at this time. Mr. Brummit has not
attended meetings and is not currently familiar with commission projects. The PRlHS/PS
Committee will consider the appointment on June 22 meeting, with their recommendation coming
before full Council on July 7.
c:
Kenneth Nyberg, City Manager
Philip Keightley, Deputy City Manager
Ann Guenther, Human Services Manager
. ..; : UK..
.' ~""",¡,'
MEMOCC
g'fUM ~
34610 2nd Lane South, Apt G-108 Federal Way, WA 98003
Ann Guenther
Human Services Manager
City of Federal Way
RECEIVED
JUN 09 1998
CITY CL
CITY OF PfteSRAOFFICE
LWAY
June 8, 1998
Dear Ann and the Human Services Commission:
First of ~IIJhank you for the work you are doing to serve those in need here in Federal Way.
I have E}njoyed being a volunteer with the City of Federal Way for the past year and a half.
Unfortunately, due to my upcoming move to India, I need to resign from my position on the
Human Services Commission.
In the short time that I have lived in Federal Way, I have seen many developments.. in the
community which I see as positive. Yet, there are many challenges remaining to create a
community where people feel connected to one another and where people are actively
concerned about helping their neighbors in times of need.
I believe that those volunteers serving on the Human Services Commission care about this
community, but there appears to be a lack of vision for the future or a clear focus on the
underlying purpose of the commission. Its decisions and actions seem to be more reactive
than proactive. Federal Way is a young city without the benefit of a well developed "social
infrastructure." By that I mean that there seems to be a shortage of opportunities for
community members to get personally involved serving the community, especially the "poor"
in Federal Way.
It is not enough to direct resources to professional agencies to serve the poor for ~.he rest of
us. What is needed is a commission that will be a catalyst for engaging peoplèìntd-àction
and connecting people's lives with one another. If we limit the activities of the commission
to providing financial resources for basic services, we fall short of what is best for helping
the poor and creating a strong community.
-_.~
I hope that these parting words are both an encouragement and a challenge to you and
those others involved with human services for the City of Federal Way.
~k-JP
Brian Gammill
MEETING DATE: July 7th, 1998
ITEM# :rz- Ç<)
.................................................................................................................................".....................................................................
............................................
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Military Road South at Star Lake Road Signalization Project; 100% Design Approval
and Authorization to Bid
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
X CONSENT
ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
HEARIN G
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMA TION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................
...~!!.~.ç.~.~.~.'!ß.:......~~.~.~.~.~~.?~~..~~..~~~..!~~.~..~..~~~.'...~.~?~..!:-..~~.?~~~!!.!~~.~p?~.~~.~?.~..ç.~.~.~~.~~~.~.........................
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The Military Road South and Star Lake Road Signalization Project will add
a traffic signal, illumination, asphalt overlay and channelization for left turns at this high accident location.
No right-of-way is required for this project.
Funding for the project is from the Hazard Elimination Program in the amount of $162,000.00 (90%
participation), and the City in the amount of$18,000.00 (10%) for a total budget of$180,000.00.
ESTIMA TED PROJECT COSTS
Design Engineering
WSDOT forces costs
Engineer's Estimate for Construction costs
10% Construction Contingency
Cost for advertising and printing
Total Estimated Project Cost
$ 33,771.40
$ 2,500.00
$ 129,092.50
$ 12,909.25
$ 2,500.00
$ 180,773.15
... TÞ.~. p. ~~ j ~.~~. ~.~.. ~s.~.~ ~ ~ ~~~.. ~.<?. .~.~..~?? ~:..~.?. ~.Y.~~. ~ ~ ~.~.~~?. ~~Y. .Y.~~! .~~.~~. .~!.~~..~.~.. ~~ ~.~~~~ ~~.. ~ ~..~ ~~~ ~..~ r.!l. ~.~~. ~~:.............
"""""""",,""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"
.".,..."...,...........,.......,....."...........,."""""""""""""""
""""",,""""""........................,..,..,"""""""""
CITY COUNCIL COl\1MITfl.L RECOMMENDATION: At its June l-'th, 1998 meeting, the Land Use
and Transportation Committee forwarded the following recommendations to the July 7th, 1998 City Council
meeting:
1) Approve the final design plans for the Military Road South at Star Lake Road Signalization Project;
"
2) Authorize staff to proceed with bidding the project. Bids will brought directly to the City Council for
award of the construction contract if bids received are within budget.
""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""/,""""""""""'"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: ~ c~ii:b ,~-~~~z-~~
~; ;~~~~ ;~~;~~~~; ~ ~;;. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~~~; ;:Æi~ð £{~mm
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
(
APPROVED
DENIED
_TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
K:\COUNCILlAGDBILLS\ 1998\ST ARLAKE.CC
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
DATE:
June 8, 1998
TO:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land Useffransportation Committee
FROM:
Ken Miller, Street Systems Manager
,?r-^
SUBJECT:
Military Road South at Star Lake Road Signalization Project;
100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid
BACKGROUND
The Military Road South and Star Lake Road Signalization Project will add a traffic signal,
illumination, asphalt overlay and channelization for left turns at this high accident location. No right-
of-way is required for this project.
Funding for the project is from the Hazard Elimination Program in the amount of $162,000 (90%
participation), and the City in the amount of $18,000 (10%) for a total budget of $180,000.
ESTIMA TED PROJECT COSTS
Design Engineering
WSDOT forces costs
Engineer's Estimate for Construction costs
Contingencies (10% of Construction costs)
Costs for advertising and printing
The total estimated cost for this project
$ 33,771.40
$ 2,500.00
$129,092.50
$ 12,909.25
$ 2,500.00
$180,773.15
The project is estimated to be $773.15 over budget, any variance will be addressed at award if
needed.
The 100% complete project plans and budget will be presented to the Committee at the June 15, 1998
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Place the following items on the July 7, 1998 Council Consent Agenda for approval:
- -1.: Approve -the final design plans.for the Military Road South at Star LakèRoadSignalization
Project.
2. Authorize staff to proceed with bidding the project. Bids will be brought directly to the City
Council for award of the construction contract if bids received are within budget.
MEETING DATE: July 7th, 1998
~-
ITEM# J (f)
"""""""""""""""""'.'."'."'."".""""...""""."..."".""".."..".""'..""'."'..".".".""""'.""...".".............................".............................................................................
.....,
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
A G END A ITEM
SUBJECT: South 304th Street and Military Road, Street and Traffic Signal Improvements, 100%
......................................!?~ ~.~g !!:..1:P P.r:.~ ~.f!:.~..f!:.'!:4./!!!:t!!:.f!..':!:!l!:.tj~1!:J~ ..!!J~~.. ......... .."..."'."."""...."."'. .""". ...,.. ..................
.... ....... .......... .......... ...........'
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
_X_CO NSENT
_ORDINANCE
_BUSINESS
_HEARING
_FYI
_RESOLUTION
_STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMA TION
_STUDY SESSION
_OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
"......................................................................"...........".............................................................................."....."..""'."...""""..."."."""......
.....................".............""'.'
...A.I.!,~.Ç~.~~~!§.:.....M.~!!l.~t~!1.~~~..~~..~~.~}~!1.~}.~~.~.:}.~?~..~~~.9..Y.~.~..~!1.~..T.~~~.~p'~~.~~.~?!?...ç.~.~!!l.~.~~.~~.................
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The South 304th Street and Military Road Improvement Project was
funded as a part of the 1995 voter approved bond issue. Currently, South 304th Street and Military Road
are two lanes at the intersection. In the evening, the intersection is very congested due to left turns
blocking the through traffic.
This project will install left turn lanes and an asphalt shoulder on Military Road and South 304th Street at
the intersection. Also, the intersection of South 304th Street and 28th A venue South will be lowered
approximately four (4) feet to improve site distance.
Estimated Project Costs:
Right of Way $ 3,500.00
Remaining Design Costs $ 25,000.00
Construction Estimate $ 667,000.00
Asphalt Overlay Costs $ 43,000.00
10% Construction Contingency $ 71,000.00
Printing/Advertising $ 5,000.00
Utility Adjustments $ 5,000.00
................ ""...'."""'."'.'.""'.".... ..... T 9. !.~~.. g~ !.tæ;:!-.~~g. ç9. ~ ~~..................................... $.. ~. t 2,.~ 9.9.:.Q9.............................................
..................".................,
. .1
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
.""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" . """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"
Available Budget:
Project Funds
Asphalt Overlay Funds
Total Funds Available
$ 748,000.00
$ 43,000.00
$ 791,000.00
The project is estimated to be approximately $28,500.00 over the available budget. This cost increase is due
to splitting the Military Road Project into two because of a Shoreline Permit requirement for the South 304th
Street phase. The first phase from South 284th Street to South 286th Street is complete. This change required
additional design, plans and specifications for the second phase. Construction costs are higher from the original
estimate due to inflation. Also, the concrete surface of Military Road is in poor condition which was not
originally identified in the original project scope and will need to be overlayed. All the costs for the asphalt
overlay will be reimbursed from the 1998 Asphalt Overlay Program contingency.
Staff recommends bidding the project as presented and reducing the 10% construction contingency of
$71,000.00 to 6%, or $42,600.00, to balance the budget. If the construction bids received are at or below the
estimated cost, the project will be taken directly to Council for award. If the bids are over the 6% available
contingency, the project will be brought back to Committee. There is one parcel of property required, the owner
.. . ~!:l.~. Þ.~~.~.. ~. ~Ð.~!:l.~ ~ ~.~.. !:l.~.~. . !:l.~.. ~ ff ~E.. ~.~ ~~.:... I.~.~. p'~gi ~.~ ~} ~ .. ~ ~ ~.~ ~P. ~ ~ ~.~.. ~g.. !?~..!? ~.~)~.. ~ ~~. Y.. A ~ g~ ~ ~:.... ......
""""" .. . """"" ..... "'"
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At its June 15th, 1998 meeting, the Land Use
and Transportation Committee approved forwarding the following recommendations to the July 7, 1998 City
Council meeting:
Approve the final design of the Military Road and South 304th Street Improvement
Project.
2. Authorize staff to bid the project. If the lowest responsive bid is within the proposed
budget and there is a 10% construction contingency available, it will be brought directly
back to Council for award.
3. Approve transferring $43,000.00 from the 1998 Asphalt Overlay Contingency to fund
........ """ .... ~.~.~. .~~ ~~E.~.~~~.~ ~~ ..~~ P ?!:l.~.~. g.~.~E~. ~ Y. :...... "'" .... """"""" """"" """"""""""""""""""" ...... """"'" ......... .... .... """""""'" """""" ........
..... ....... ""'"
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDA nON, ~";,~ ú-~"""- ~ ,1>'1':1'7 ~_D~
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""',"""'","""...m.'""""",,,f'-'it....~...~~..........n...................n.........
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: ~lt. .
1.
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
_TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
K:\COUNCIL\AGDBIUS\ I 998\MILUO4.CC
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
CITY OF ..
- . ~.....~..,,~
-~~ RY~~'-
DATE:
June 1, 1998
TO:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land Use and Transportation Committee r
Ken Miller, Street Systems Manager ~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
South 304th Street and Military Road, Street and Traffic
Signal Improvements, 100% Design Approval and Authorization to Bid.
BACKGROUND
The South 304th Street and Military Road Improvement Project was funded as a part of the 1995
voter approved bond issue. Currently South 304th Street and Military Road are two lanes at the
intersection. In the evening the intersection is very congested due to left turns blocking the through
traffic.
This project will install left turn lanes and an asphalt shoulder on Military Road and South 304th
Street at the intersection. Also, the intersection of South 304th Street and 28th Avenue South will
be lowered approximately 4 feet to improve site distance.
Estimated Project Costs:
Right of Way
$ 3,500.00
Remaining Design Costs
$ 25,000.00
Construction Estimate
$667,000.00
Asphalt Overlay Costs
$ 43,000.00
Construction Contingency (10%)
$ 71,000.00
Printing/Advertising
$ 5,000.00
Utility Adjustments
$ 5,000.00
Total Estimated Costs
$819,500.00
Available Budget:
"
Project Funds
$748,000.00
Asphalt Overlay Funds
$ 43,000.00
Total Funds Available
$791,000.00
The project is estimated to be approximately $28,500.00 over the available budget. This cost increase
is due to splitting the Military Road Project into two due to a Shoreline Permit requirement for the
South 304th Street phase. The first phase from South 284th Street to South 286th Street is
complete. This change required additional design, plans and specifications for the second phase.
Construction costs are higher from the original estimate due to inflation. Also, the concrete surface
of Military Road is in poor condition which was not originally identified and will need to be
overlayed. All the costs for the asphalt overlay will be reimbursed from the 1998 Asphalt Overlay
Program contingency.
Staff recommends bidding the project as presented and reducing the 10% contingency of $71,000.00
to 6% or $42,600.00 to balance the budget. If the construction bids received are at or below the
estimated cost, the project will be taken directly to Council for award. If the bids are over the 6%
available contingency, the project will be brought back to Committee.
There is one parcel of property required, the owner has been contacted and an offer made. The
project is anticipated to be bid in August. Staff will present the project and budget at the June 15,
1998 LUTC meeting for discussion.
Recommendation
Place the following items on the July 7, 1998 Council Consent Agenda.
1.
Approve the final design of the Military Road and South 304th Street Improvement
Project.
2.
Authorize staff to bid the project. If the lowest responsive bid is within the proposed
budget and there is a 10% contingency available, it will be brought directly back to
Council for award.
3.
Approve transferring $43,000.00 from the 1998 Asphalt Overlay Contingency to
fund the intersection asphalt overlay.
KM:km
K:\LUTaI998\MILC304.MEM
"
MEETING DATE: July 7th, 1998
ITEM#
-:II ~)
.............................................,........'..................,.................................."""""""""""."""".................,..............................................,........-.
..........................,...
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: SW 312th Street and 14th Avenue SW Pedestrian Walkway Project. Final Design
. ................,.......... .... ....1:.f!!.!.l!..~l!:t .l!:!!:.r! .1.'!:.~~~~~~l!:.tjl!..'!:..~l!...!!J~.... ... ......, -. ... ......... ..................... ..........,. .......,.......
..........."'" ....,................. ..........""
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMP ACT:
X CONSENT
ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMA TION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
....................................,..............................................,......................................................,............................................................
..............,...........................,..
...~!.!~.ç.~~~.~.T~.:......~~.~.?E~~.~~~..~.?~?~..!~~'~"~"?~~'...~.?~.~..~.~~.~.Y~~..~!l.~..!.~.~~~P.?~~~!.?!l...ç?~~.~~~.~................
SUMMARYfBACKGROUND: Final design of the SW 3121h St and 141h Ave SW Pedestrian Walkway
Project is complete and the plans have been reviewed by the Federal Way Fire Department and School
District.
The design consists of widening the existing shoulder to provide an approximately 6' asphalt walkway with
a mountable curb along SW 312th Street, from Dash Point Road to 8th Ave SW, installing a new 6' concrete
sidewalk (next to the curb), and concrete curb and gutter on the west side of 14th Avenue SW, from SW
312th Street to Lakota Junior High School.
The estimated cost of the project is $113,000.00 and includes the cost for construction and project
administration. The project budget consists of a $48,000.00 TIB grant, with a $12,000.00 grant match
budgeted in 1997, and $53,000.00 from the 1998 Streets Structures Operations budget.
Once the design of this project is approved by Council, staff will complete the bidding documents for the
...P'~?j~~~.~~.~..~.~~~E~!.~.~..!~.~..~!.~~.:....~.~t!.~.~~!~!p.~.~~.~..~~~~~!.~~..~~~..~~.~~~~~~..!.~..~~.~.~~.~:........................................................,.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMEND A nON: At its June 15th, 1998 meeting, the Land Use
and Transportation Committee approved fOlwarding the following recommendations to the July 7th, 1998 City
Council meeting:
1)
Approve the final design of the SW 312th St and 14th Ave SW Pedestrian Walkway Project;
2) Authorize staff to bid the project and return to Council for award.
""""""...................................,.......................................................,................................................,...........""'~"'-"""""""""'~f""""""""""'"..........
..,
CITY MANAGER RECOMMEND A TI ON, ~ ~-;;. ~v [:-~: Î v"'"'
""""""""""'..........................,......................................................."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""....;þ¡¡.......~...........................................'
...~;.; ~~ ~~~;~~..~~~~.~.~~~..~.. ~~ ~~~~..;¡~~;;..... "JJfi:"""'" """'" .".. ........ .... """""""" ...... ...... """" """""""
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
_APPROVED
DENIED
TABLED /DEFERRED /NO ACTION
K:\CQUNCILlAGDBILLS\ 1998\312SWBID.CC
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
DATE:
June 5, 1998
TO:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land UselTransportation Committee
FROM:
Ken Miller, Street Systems Manager
\t~
SUBJECT:
Approve Final Design and Authorization to bid
The SW 312th Street and 14h Avenue SW Pedestrian Walkway Project
Background: Public Works Staff has completed the design of the SW 312/h St and 14/11 Ave SW
Pedestrian Walkway Project, and plans are currently under review by the Federal Way Fire Department
and the Federal Way School District. The design consists of widening the existing shoulder to provide
an approximately 6' asphalt walkway with a mountable curb along SW 312th Street, from Dash Point
Road to 8th Ave SW, and installing a new 6' concrete sidewalk (next to the curb), concrete curb and
gutter on the west side of 14th Avenue SW, from SW 312th Street to Lakota Junior High School. The
estimated cost of the project is $113,000 and includes the cost for construction and project
administration. The project budget consists of $48,000 TIB grant, with a $12,000 grant match budgeted
in 1997, and $53,000 from the 1998 Streets Structures Operations budget.
The project and budget will be presented at the June 15, 1998 LUTC meeting.
Once the design of this project is approved by Council, staff will complete the bidding documents for the
project and advertise for bids. The anticipated award date for this contract is in August.
Recommendation
Place the following recommendations on the July 7, 1998 City Council meeting's consent agenda:
1)
Approve the final design of the SW 312th St and 14th Ave SW Pedestrian Walkway Project;
2)
Authorize staff to bid the project. Bids will be brought directly back to Council for award.
K:\LlTTC\I998\312SWBID.MEM (PSK)
.. ..--=-.-""'."'"
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM#
--=-v- '
X#L)
.
.....................................................................................",.......................................................................................,........................
.................................................................".....
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
....~y ~.J:~ .ç,,! .;... Ç, ~.~ ~.Þ ~ ~! ~ ~!!.. ~ ~ ~~. ..f.! ~ g J~. Q.!~.... -........................................................ """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
_X- CONSENT
_ORDINANCE
_BUSINESS
_HEARIN G
_FYI
_RESOLUTION
_STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMA TION
_STUDY SESSION
_OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
.........................................................................................,................""""""""""""""""""""-""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"...............................,........
........................
....A II A. ç.!~ M~.NT §.;...... ~.~.!~.?!:I.. ~ ~.~ ß ~ ~~~.~. ~~ ~~}.'. } .~ ~ ~. ~ }. ~ !.~~ ~. ~~~ ~ ..g~~.~. M ~.? ~~ :..PJ :.~~ ~.? ~ . ~ f. ç, ~ ~~. ~~.!>'.. P. ~ ~.~ ~ .? P..~.~
~.~.............
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: During the February 23, 1998 Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council
Committee meeting, committee members reviewed a motion from the Parks and Recreation Commission to consider increasing
the height of one of the 35 foot flag poles at Celebration Park to 60 feet. Staff reported that the requested height may require
approval or a variance. Since that meeting, staff have requested information from Community Developmenl and learned that the
Development Guide under section 22-1047 (2)(b) defines flag poles as an appurtenance and permits the Director of Community
Development to exceed the maximum height of 35 feet. Attached is the approval letter from the Director of Community
....P.~.~~.~9P.~~!:I.!:.............................................................................................................................................................,..................
..............................................................,....
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On March 3,1998, the Council Committee passed a
motion to direct staff to request increasing the height of one flag pole from 35 feet to 60 feet in accordance with
section 22-1047(2)(b) of the Development Guide, work with the architect to propose a flag pole, recommend
placement and appropriate size of the flag, and upon approval from the Director of Community Development,
.J?~~~~~..~g.,~~~J~,g.Ç~~.~E ~.U~!..~P'P'~~,~,~1.:.......... ..............................,....... """"""""""""""""""""""""""""-')-7, """', .,fl""""","",':"""""'" ........... ..............
~::~-:t.;,I' j ;,.Iil,~
.. ..ç,.! IX.. ~,~,~ ~ ç ~~.. ~~. ç,.Q ~.M~. ~P~! ~ 9..~.:.. A P.P. ~~,~ ~!..9r~g ~~. ~~~~ ~:... .............f. ~ I..... ~ j...... ............. ............. .....
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: dJlù
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
_TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
Item 5H
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, HUMAN SERVICES & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMnTEE
.'
Date:
March 3, 1998
From:
David Wilbrecht, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Subject:
Celebration Park Flag Pole
Background:
During the February 23, 1998 Parks, Recreation, Human Services and Public Safety Council
Committee meeting, committee members reviewed the motion from the Parks Commission to
consider increasing the height of one of the 35 foot flag poles at Celebration Park to 60 feet. Staff
reported that the requested height may require approval or a variance. The Committee members
requested staff to follow up and report back the Community Development requirements.
Since that meeting, staff have requested information from Community Development and have learned
that the Development Guide under section 22-1047 (2) (b) defines flagpoles as an appurtenance and
permits the Director of Community Development to exceed the maximum height of 3 5 feet.
mmi e m n ti n:
Direct staff to request increasing the height of one flag pole from 35 feet to 60 feet in
accordance with section 22-1047 (2) (b) of the Development Guide. Work with the architect
to propose a flag pole. Recommend placement and appropriate size of flag. Upon approval
from the Director of Community Development forward to the full Council for approval.
Maintain flag pole heights according to the approved plan adopted by the Council.
-2.
OF COl\f.MITIEE REPORT:
~-d~Lt--
ommlttee Member
ED ERAL
~ 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
(253) 661-4000
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
May 12, 1998
Mr. Dave Wilbrecht, Deputy Parks Director
City of Federal Way Parks Department
33530 First Way South
Federal Way, WA 98003
!'". :u,~f7
'~(Q)\f\J
Re:
Request to Install a 60-foot Flagpole - Federal Way File No: UP397-0002
FEDERAL WAY SPORTS FIELD COMPLEX CELEBRATION PARK
Dear Mr. Wilbrecht:
This is in response to your April 4, 1988, request to install one 60-foot tall flagpole instead of a
35-foot tall flag pole. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) allows structures up to 35 feet above
average building elevation subject to special regulations and notes contained in Section 22-833.
Furthennore, FWCC Section 22-104 7(b) allows certain appurtenances to exceed the maximum
height allowed pursuant to FWCC Section 22-833, if based on accurate graphic representations,
the director of community development services detennines that views from adjacent properties
will not be affected. In addition, any appurtenance other than chimneys and antennas must be
screened from all streets and nearby properties.
We have not received a graphic representation of the proposed flag, however graphically flags
are fairly unifonn in nature. Furthermore, based on information provided by you, the flag will be
a government flag or some other flag approved by the City Manager's Office. Based on
infonnation provided with your request, all flags will be located within the interior of the park in
the vicinity of the soft ball plaza and therefore, should not block views from adjacent properties.
Also, since this is a park which after development will have large areas of forest, vegetative open
space, and small dispersed buildings, adequate screening will be in place to screen the flag pole
from streets and nearby properties.
Your request for a 60 foot tall flag is hereby being granted. Please be advised that flag poles do
not require a building pennit, however structural calculations are required to be submitted to the
building division in order for them to review for potential wind shear problems that may result in
broken poles or overturning. It is my understanding that this requirement has not been met to
date for any of the flag poles.
Please contact Lee Bailey, Lead Plans Examiner, at (253) 661-4123 for further infonnation
concerning what needs to be submitted for building review.
Mr. Dave Wilbrecht
May 12, 1998
Page 2
Should you have any questions, please call Margaret H. Clark, AlCP, Senior Planner, 661-4111.
Sincerely,
~~M~
Director of Community Development Services
c: Philip Keightley, Deputy City Manager
.4enny Schroder, Parks Director
Kathy McClung, Deputy Director of CDS
Greg Fewins, Principal Planner
Margaret H. Clark, AICP, Senior Planner
Mary Kate Gaviglio, Building Official
Lee Bailey, Lead Plans Examiner
1:\LETTERS\Fl..AGPOUWPDIMIY 12. 1998
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM#
:=JZ:~,)
............................................................................,........"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".""""""""""""'".....................................................................
......."...............".....
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
....~ Y. ~.J ~. ç.!.;... ~ ~! ~ Q ~ ~ ~.. M ~!. ~.!~. ~ ~.~ ç~... ç. ~ ~p ~E ~.!~.~.~... ç.~.~.!!". ~ ~.t A ~.~~. ~ ~~~.!........................
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
_X- CONSENT
_ORDINANCE
_BUSINESS
_HEARING
_FYI
_RESOLUTION
_STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMA TION
_STUDY SESSION
_OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
...............................................................................................",........................................................................................".............
...........................................................",...........
... AI :r:~.. Ç}!M~~.I §.:.. ....~ ~.~ !.? ~J?~. ~ ~ ~ ~~..!~?~) ~ z), ~~.~ i ß~~!~.. ~~~.? ~.~ ..~!!l. ~ ~ ~.~ ~.~.~.....................................................................
..................... . ..
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: National Maintenance Corporation has been providing janitorial services at City Hall and
Klahanee Lake Community/Senior Center since July 1,996. Historically, there has been high turnover in staff within the
companies which held the contracts. NMC now has a good District Manager and maintenance staff that is performing well. Slaff
recommends extending the term of the contract an additional year to end June 30. 1999. at which time rebidding of services will
occur. This amendment increases the curren I contract by $23.700. for a total of $66,492 over a three year period. City policy
....~~.q~.!~~~..ç~.~~~!.!}p'p'~'?'~.~!..~.f.P. ~E.~.~.~~.~~.9.~.~~.~.?Q:QgQ:.................................. ......................".................... ................... ........................
.........,............ .................
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On June 22,1998, the Parks, Recreation, Human
Services & Public Safety Council Committee passed a motion to recommend amending the CUITent contract with
... ~.~~.! 9. ~~} ..~.~~. ~.~ ~.~ .~?. ~ ~ S:. 9. æg.~ ~ ~.~ 9.?.. ~ Y..i ?.~ ~~.~ ~.~ ?. g..~. ~.~. E ~ ~ P.~.~.~.~ ~! .? ~..~ ~ ~. ~ 2 QQ . ~?. 9.. ~.~;~!!. ~ ~ E.g.. ~~ ~.. ~~~~.
~.~} ~?. ~,} g.,. }, ~ ~~. :.....
.. ..Ç} !.Y...~.~.~. ~g ~ ~.. g~.ç.Q ~.~~.~P A!. ~ Q.~.: .. A P.P. ~~.Y. ~!.. ~ i. ~ .? ~ ~.!; ~ ~~ f~ Jl (/ iÄ................... ....,........ .. ... ..... ..
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: (jf)¿
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
- T ABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
Item 5D
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
Date:
June 15, 1998
From:
Steve Ikerd, Property Services Manager
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department
Subject:
National Maintenance Corporation Contract Amendment
Background:
National Maintenance Corporation has been providing janitorial services at City Hall and Klahanee
Lake Community/Senior Center since July 1, 1996. Historically, we have experienced high turnover
in staff within the companies which held the contracts. NMC now has a good District Manager and
maintenance staff that is performing well. I recommend extending the term of this contract an
additional year to end June 30, 1999, at which time rebidding of services will be solicited. This
amendment will increase the current contract by $23,700, for a total of $66,492 over a three year
period. City policy requires City Council approval of purchases over $20,000.
Committee Recommendation:
Motion to amend the current contract with National Maintenance Corporation by increasing the
compensation $23,700 and extending the term to June 30, 1999.
APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
~.Q --k'.~
ommittee Member
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
MAINTENANCE I LABOR AGREEMENT
FOR
JANITORIAL SERVICES
DR4FT
This Second Amendment ("Amendment") is dated effective this
1st day of July, 1998, and is entered into by and between the City
of Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation ("City"), and
National Maintenance Corporation a Washington corporation
("Contractor") .
A. The City and Contractor entered into a Maintenance/Labor
Agreement dated effective July I, 1996, as amended by First
Amendment dated effective July I, 1997, whereby Contractor agreed
to provide janitorial services at City Hall, 33530 1st Way South,
and Klahanee Lake Community/Senior Center, 33901 9th Avenue South,
Federal Way, Washington (collectively, the "Agreement").
B. 18.2 Modification of the Agreement provided that the
Agreement may only be amended by written agreement signed by the
parties.
C. The City and the Contractor desire to amend the Agreement
to continue the Services described in Section 1 of the Agreement by
extending the term of the Agreement and increasing the compensation
paid to the Contractor.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following terms and
conditions:
1. Term. Section 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to
extend the term of the Agreement until June 30, 1999.
2. Compensåtion. In consideration of Contractor continuing
to provide the Services described in Section 1 of the Agreement
during the extended term of the Agreement, Section 4.1 shall be
amended to increase the compensation paid to the Contractor by an
additional amount not to exceed Twenty Three Thousand Seven Hundred
and no/100 Dollars ($23,700.00). The total amount payable to
Contractor pursuant to the original Agreement, the First Amendment
and this Second Amendment shall be an amount not to exceed Sixty
Six Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Two and no/100 Dollars
($66,492.00) .
3. Full Force and Effect. All other terms and conditions of
the Agreement not modified by this Amendment shall remain in full
force and effect.
DATED the effective date set forth above.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By:
Kenneth E. Nyberg
Its City Manager
33530 1st Way South
Federal Way, Washington
98003
ATTEST:
City Clerk, N. Christine Green, CMC
v
. Lindell
NATIONAL MAINTENANCE CORPORATION
By:
Bill Gordy
Its: Account Executive
1801 130th Avenue NE
Bellevue, WA 98005
(425) 881-0500
a :nme. 2nd
06/10/98 (sef/Parks)
- 2 -
Exhibit A
JANITORIAL SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
KLAHANEE LAKE COMMUNITY/SENIOR CENTER
1. Daily Services (Sunday-Thursday)
1. Empty all waste receptacles and dispose of properly.
Recycling containers emptied 1-2 times per week.
2. Empty and clean all exterior ash/trash receptacles.
3. Replace liners as needed.
4. Police and dispose of litter and debris outside all entries.
5. Dust all horizontal surfaces within reach.
6. Dust and clean accessible surfaces of desk, chairs, tables, counters, and other office
furniture. Use cleaner when applicable.
7. Dust and clean directory boards.
8. Vacuum all carpeted areas and spot clean as needed.
9. Vacuum exterior entrance mats/sweep outside entries.
10. Vacuum elevator and spot clean interior.
11. Spot clean door glass at all entries.
12. Spot clean work surfaces for spillage or coffee rings.
13. Spot clean walls around light switches and door frames.
14. Clean lunch/conference room to include: wipe down table, chair, counter, sink,
aITange furniture neat and orderly. Vacuum carpet.
Clean counters, wash basins, miITors, dispensers, and chrome fixtures.
Clean and sanitize toilets, seats and urinals.
Sanitize and clean drinking fountain.
Sanitize walls around sinks, towel dispensers, urinals, partitions and doors.
Check and refill all dispensers: paper towels, toilet tissue, seat covers, sanitary napkin,
soap and air fresheners.
Sweep and damp mop hard surface floors with a neutral disinfectant.
Secure lights and lock all exterior doors after public meetings.
Notify building manger of any mechanical, plumbing or security problems.
Alann all areas at end of schedule.
Sanitize food prep tables, counters, appliances, sweep and mop kitchen floor.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
2. Monthly Services: (contractor to provide schedule the first of each month)
1. Detail vacuum comers and edges.
2. Vacuum upholstered furniture.
3. Dusting high and low ledges, surfaces and window blinds.
4. Sanitize all phones including public pay phone.
5. Computers and copy machines to be wiped clean.
6. Filing cabinets to be sanitized and cleaned of finger prints and stains.
7. Wipe down walls not done daily to include restrooms, kitchens, paneling and spot clean
halls.
8. Machine scrub and refinish restroom tile floors.
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM# :JL- Çj )
....................."....................................""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""","""""""""""""""""""""""..................
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
... ~ y~~~ Ç.T; ..~ 9. ~.~ .~Y..? !:...~ ~.~~.. y ~.~( ~ ~.~~~. .h.~~~.. P.~~~..... no................,.................... ..........., no.......' ....................,. no... no""""""'"
no....,....... no"""'"
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
X CONSENT
ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
HEARIN G
FYI
RESOLUTION
_STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMA TI 0 N
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
.............................................,................................................................,.....................................................,..................................
........,...................................................
...ATTAÇ~.~~~!.~.;.. ...A..~~~??.fs>.~..~~~~.~. }~!l.~..}.~ ?..~. ?? ~.. ......., ...... ....,... .... ..., .........., ....... ........... ..,.... .... .............,. .... """"""""""""""""'"
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: Since incorporation, the City has made significant improvements to Steel
Lake Park. These improvements, along with the level of maintenance and beautiful setting, have resulted
in Steel Lake Park becoming the preferred park for picnic reservations and special use requests. In 1997,
between AprilS and September 28, there were 116 picnic reservations for a total attendance of7,193. In
addition, there were 15 special events approved from March 25 to October 4 for a total attendance of
4,459. The high attendance on weekends during the summer from picnic reservations, beach use and
special events exceeded the park's parking capacity and staffing required to manage the restrooms, litter
and parking control. In addition, problems occurred requiring police assistance including illegal parking,
blocked access for emergency response, excessive littering, illegal drinking, dogs off leash, confrontations
at the basketball court, and driving on grass areas. On several occasions, the park entrance gate would be
closed in an effort to control the parking and crowds. At the conclusion of the summer season, staff
reviewed the picnic reservation and special use policies as well as received input from the Police
Department on how to prevent the types of problems that required police assistance. There were 185 calls
for service at the park during the months of May through August. Recognizing that Steel Lake Park has
215 parking stalls, staff used a 4: 1 ratio to establish a parking occupancy of 860 park users. Staff
presented the draft policies to the committee. It was recognized that Family Fest and the Salmon Bake
....~g.~}~.?g.~..~.~..~[f€?~~~.~..~.Y..~Þ:~..P~!.~~.Y.'........................... ...................,..... ...... "" .................. ....................,...... """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..
.
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: On June 22,1998, the Parks, Recreation,
Human Services & Public Safety Committee passed a motion recommending the following policies for
picnic and special use permits:
I. Special use permits and picnics combined are limited to up to 700 people;
2. Picnic reservations limited to 520 participants.
3. No picnic reservations will be accepted when a special use permit activity is scheduled for group(s)
of more than 500.
No special use permits will be accepted when the picnic reservations approved and the special use
requests exceed 700 participants.
4.
".,."",....,...,.,."",..,.."",."""",.",...,.,.,.,...",...".""""""""""""""",..,.""""",""",.,.,.,.",.",.."....,.,...,...",."""""..."""""""",...""",..""",..""""......"",..""".""""",..,.,.,
. ..~.~~~ ..~~~.~ ~.~ ~. ~ .~.~ ~~~ ~~.~ ~~~.~~.. ~.~ ~ ~~.~.~.~..~.~. ~.~.=.=.~ ~~~.~ ..~~~ ~~.ð ~........................................
.""."",.,."".",.,.,.".."".""..",.,."".,.""",."",.",.......
".""""'.""..""""""".'.""'.""""""""".""""""""'..".......
.""."".""""",..""""...",."".""."""",.",.."""",.
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL /lfi:
PACKET: ~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED
DENIED
_TABLED/DEFERREDINO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
I:\CQYERCC-5/14/96
Item 5B
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
Date:
June 16, 1998
From:
Jennifer Schroder, Director
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Subject:
Policy on Park Use/Steel Lake Park
Background
Since incorporation, the City has made significant improvements to Steel Lake Park: 1992 basketball
and volleyball court installation, 1994 park shelter and Family Funland, and the beach restroom and
plaza improvement in 1996. These improvements, along with the level of maintenance and beautiful
setting, have resulted in Steel Lake Park becoming the preferred park for picnic reservations and
special use requests.
In 1997, between April 5 and September 28, there were 116 picnic reservations for a total attendance
of7,193. In addition to picnic reservations, there were 15 special events approved from March 25
to October 4 for a total attendance of 4,459.
The high attendance on the weekends during the summer from picnic reservations, beach use and
special events exceeded the park's parking capacity and staffing required to manage the restrooms,
litter and parking control. In addition, problems occurred requiring police assistance included the
following:
.
illegal parking
blocked access for emergency response
excessive littering
illegal drinking
dogs off leash
confrontations at the basketball court
driving on grass areas
.
.
.
.
.
.
On several occasions, the park entrance gate would be closed in an effort to control the parking and
over-crowdedness.
At the conclusion of the summer season, staff reviewed the picnic reservation and special use
policies as well as recei ved input from the Police Department on how to prevent the type of problems
that required police assistance. There were 185 caBs for service at Steel Lake Park during the
summer months (May through August).
. .1
Parks, Recreation, Public Safety & Human Services Council Committee
June 16, 1998
Page Two
Policy Recommendation:
Recognizing Steel Lake Park has 215 parking stalls, staff have used a 4-1 stall ratio to establish a
parking occupancy limit of 860 park users. Based on this capacity, staff recommends the following
policies for picnic and special use permits:
CU\Cl.1 iclìic~ ~mb i I'\ed
Special use pennit§'limited to up to 700 people.
Special U3e permit3 Het accepted for \veektmds f>tarting July 1 throllg1+-babol Day.
Picnic reservations limited to 520 participants.
No picnic reservations will be accepted when a special use pennit activity is scheduled for
group(s) of more than 500.
No special use permits will be accepted when the picnic reservations approved and the
special use requests exceed 700 participants.
.
.
.
.
.
Committee Recommendation Options: (~;(~
1. Motion to recommend the park policies as presented by staff and forward to full Council for
approval.
(3) Motion to reommend the park policies as amended by the Council Committee.
APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
¥5~ '
--
~ ot :::i> K.;d.. '" ~
ommittee Member
C
MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998
ITEM#
:JL- §2-)
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
SlJBJECT: Approval of Use of Replacement Reserves to upgrade Dial-Out
Remote Communication Servers
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
-XCONSENT
ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMA TION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
A TT ACHMENTS: Committee recommendation.
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: The two existing dial-out communication servers were purchased in 1991 for a total of$3,200.
These units are used as poo] modems for staff to access various other agency's networks as well as allowing vendors and contractors
to access City network for maintenance and supp0l1. Many changes and enhancements have been made to the computing systems
since 199 I, hence the existing units are no longer capable of providing the connectivity needs of the CUlTent and upcoming systems
(such as ust: of Windows and Windows 95 applications over WAN, Client Server system supPOJ1, and TCP/IP connectivity).
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDA nON: This item was presented to the FinanceÆconumic
Development and RegionaJ Affairs Committee on June 23, 1998 for review The Committee has recommended forwarding to City
Council j(>r consent to use $3,200 in replacement reserves fund for the replacement of dia]-out remote communication servers.
~ ¿; ...J:6.:. 'v~~~-'"
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: ~ ~ i ~.iJl,
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET:
dJJJ?
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
- APPROVED
DENIED
- TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNCIL BILL #
1 st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
I:\CCC()VER-5/G/9(,
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MEMORANDUM
.'
Date:
To:
June 17, 1998
Finance, Economic Development & Regional Affairs Committee
Mehdi Sadri, Information Systems Manager ,B
Replacement of Dial-out / Remote Communications Servers
From:
Subject:
Action Requested:
Recommend approval of the use of$3,200 Replacement Reserves collected to purchase and
replace two dial-out communication servers.
Background:
The two existing dial-out communication servers were purchased in 1991 for a total of $3,200.
These units are used as pool modems for staff to access various other agency's networks as well
as allowing vendors and contractors to access City network for maintenance and support. Many
changes and enhancements have been made to the computing systems since 1991, hence the
existing units are no longer capable of providing the connectivity needs of the current and
upcoming systems (such as use of Windows and Windows 95 applications over WAN, Client
Server system support, and TCP/IP connectivity).
Committee Recommendation:
Recommend item be forwarded to full Council for review and approval.
APPROVAL BY COMMITTEE:
tv
Committee Chair
Æ9
Committee Member
ß/
Committee Member
K:\1ìnance\tincol1U11t\ 1 998\cOl1U11SVr. doc
.'
MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998 ITEM# :íZZ:.
......................................................,"""""""""""""""""""..........,...............................................,...............................................................,."
"""""""""""'"
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
... ~ ~~!~.~.!~...? ~ ~~. .~.. ~ ~~~..! ~~'!.~f. '!.'!l!.!!..? '!...! '!!R. ~'!.~:~ ~~ '!:.~. .l!!'!. $.!'..l!.~ 1:.'!~~~l!..~. ~~~~~.! '!':f. ~.?~~ ~.~ '!. ~.!:!'..? !f.~~~.........
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
CONSENT
ORDINANCE
BUSINESS
X HEARING
FYI
X RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMA TION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
.................."""""""""""""""""'"........................,........................................................................""""'"........................."""""""""""""'"...................
.""'"
ATTACHMENTS: Draft 1999-2004 Transportation Improvement Program/
Arterial Street Improvement Plan (TIP/ASIP) and
......,.... .......,......... ...............,......... P~.~.~~. ~~.~.?~.~~.~~!l.. .~.~~P~.~~.~. .~.~.~.~............................ .......""""""'" ........ ..............'" """""..........."""""""
'" ..............
SUMMARY/BACKGROUND: At its June 15, 1998 meeting, the City Council set the public hearing date of July 7,
1998 for accepting public comment on the proposed 1999-2004 TIP/ASIP, and ,,>'ill also consider adopting the TIP/ASIP
by Resolution.
Per RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26, the City of Federal Way adopted its original TIP/ASIP on July 23, 1991. The City
is further required to adopt a revised TIP/ASIP on an annual basis, and submit the revised version to the Washington State
Secretary of Transportation and the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board.
.......................................................,............................................................"........""""""""""""""".....................,...........'.........................
...........,.................
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: At the June 15, 1998 meeting, the Land Use/Transportation
Committee recommended that a Public Hearing be held at the July 7, 1998 City Council meeting for the purpose of
accepting public comment, and further recommended that the Council adopt the attached 1999-2004 TIP/ASIP by
Resolution.
...... "...........,....... ........ ........,............ ............,........... ............ .... ... .....""""'" ..ti~... '~~":h~"~' '('~'H~::s." j( -p In ')ï;.'>' Ä' ';~ ë~~ ~";i.AZ;.t..
~:¥:~::~=::~¡~;~~N~A:~~:~~~~~~ 14 ~~~
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED
DENIED
_TABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
K:\COL'NCIL\AGDBILLS\1998\ADOPT98. TIP
CO UN CIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
TRA NS PORTA TION IMPROVEMENT PLAN (TIP) -1998 TO 2004
.
Map 10 CAPITAL PROJECT LIST 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total
1 S 3201h St @ SR 99' Add turn lanes 136,200 1,482,900 1,619,100
2 S 336th St: 13th Ave S - 18th Ave S Wden to 4/5 lanes 693,500 693,500
3 Military Rd S @ S 304th St: Add turn lanes 704,000 704,000
4 Military Rd S @ S Star Lake Rd: Signalize, add left-turn lane 180,000 180,000
5 SR 99 S 312th St - S 324th St: Add HOV lanes 200,000 554,600 8,395,400 9,150,000
6 S 312th St SR 99 - 23rd Ave S: Wden to 5 lanes 3,336,100 1,200,000 4,536,100
7 SW 3401h St @ Hoyt Rd SW Signalize, add turn lanes 83,900 271,100 355,000
8 23rd Ave S S 317th St - S 324th St Wden to 5 lanes 800,000 3,172,000 1,601,000 5,573,000
9 SR 509 @ 8th Ave SW Signalization, left turn lanes 279,000 279,000
10 21st Ave SW @ SW 334th St: Relocate fire signal 180,000 180,C
11 SR 99 @ S 3301h St Signalization, left-turn lanes 100,000 140,000 240,000
12 S 288th St @ SR 99 Add left-turn lanes 1,115,300 1,115,300
13 S 312th St @ 14th Ave S Signalization 180,000 180,000
14 SR 99: S 324th St - S 3401h st: Construct HOV lanes 950,000 10,722,000 11,672,000
15 S 336th St @ \lVeyerhaeuser Wy S: Realign intersection 648,700 648,700
16 S 3201h St @ 1st Ave S: Add 2nd left-turn lanes we, and NB 1,739,000 1,739,000
17 5R 99 S 284th St - 5R 509 Construct HOV lanes 960,000 8,672,000 9,632,000
18 5 356th St 1st Ave 5 - 5R 99: Wden to 5 lanes 400,000 6,805,000 7,205,000
19 5 3201h St @ 201h Ave 5: Add NB rigl1t-turn lane, 2nd we, left-turn lane 1,358,000 1,358,000
20 S 3201h 5t @ 23rd Ave 5 Add 2nd left-turn lanes on 3201h 3,900,000 3,900,000
21 5 348th St: 9th Ave S - 5R 99 Add HOV lanes, EB right-turn lane at SR 99 3,096,000 3,096,000
22 21st Ave 5W/ 5W357th St: SW356th 5t - 22nd Ave SW Extend 2-lane collector 750,000 750,000
al Projects 2,700 6,780,600 10,136,400 9,050,300 10,722,000 10,712,700 10,411,000 64,805,700
.
.
.
.
NON-MOTORIZED CAPITAL PROJECT LIST 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total
23 BPA Trail Phase III SW Campus Dr - 5W 356tl1 5t: Extend trail 164,000 1 ,408,000 1,947,000
24 5W 312th St: SW Dash Pt Rd - 1st Ave 5 Shoulder improvement 73,400 244,400 377,8
25 \lVeyerhaeuser Way S 5 3201h St - S 349111 St' Shoulder improvement 652,700 652,7úu
Subtotal Non-Motorized Capital Pro ects 435,000 164,000 0 1,481,400 0 652,700 244,400 2,977,500
TOTAL CITY EXPENDITURES 10,722,000 11,365,400 10,655,400 67,783,200
.
Projects identified in 1995 StreetfTraffic Bond issue, These projects were selected to address safety and congestion in various parts of the City for a total of $7,5 million,
Delete from the TIP to derive Arterial Street Improvement Plan (A5IP)
Note: Project costs are inflated at 3% per year.
..
k:\tip98wb2
Draft 20 May 98
'.
nr'lft 1998 TIP
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN EXTENDED AND REVISED
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR 1999-2004 AND AN
ARTERIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND DIRECTING THE SAME
TO BE FILED WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE SECRETARY OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD.
(AMENDS RESOLUTION 91-67, 92-117, 93-155, 94-186, 95-210,
and 96 - 2 3 6) .
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 35.77 and
47.26 RCW, the City Council of the City of Federal Way adopted its original
Transportation Improvement Program on July 23, 1991 (Resolution No. 91-67);
and
WHEREAS,
the
Federal
Way
City
Council
updated
its
Transportation Improvement Program ("Program") on October 19, 1993, by its
passage of Resolution No. 93-155¡ and
WHEREAS,
the Federal Way City Council further updated its
Transportation Improvement Program on October 4, 1994 (Resolution No. 94-
186); and
WHEREAS,
the Federal Way City Council further updated its
Transportation Improvement Program on July 18, 1995 (Resolution No. 95-
210); and
RES #
, PAGE 1
[.--,..r, .,"'.¡..r...~.
. ì- - . ,- r,
-:'.5 ~ ,-' .; ~
WHEREAS,
the Federal Way City Council
further updated its
Transportation Improvement Program on July 16, 1996 (Resolution No. 96-
236); and
WHEREAS,
the Federal Way City council
further updated its
Transportation Improvement Program on July 1, 1997 (Resolution No., 97-
258); and
WHEREAS,
the City Council of the City of Federal Way has
reviewed the work accomplished under the existing Program and has reviewed
work scheduled to be accomplished according to the updated Program; and
WHEREAS,
a public hearing was held on the proposed annual
update to the Transportation Improvement Program on July 7,
1998,
in
compliance with the requirements of State laws; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council has determined current and future
City street and arterial needs, and based upon these findings has prepared
a revised and extended Transportation Improvement Program and an Arterial
Street Improvement Plan for the ensuing six calendar years; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 35.77 and
47.26
RCW,
the
City
Council
hereby
adopts
a
revised
and
extended
Transportation Improvement Program and an Arterial Street Improvement Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously found that there will
be no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of adoption or
implementation of this Transportation Improvement Program and the Arterial
Street
Improvement
Plan and
the
extended
and
revised Transportation
RES #
, PAGE 2
r"'~' "". '7.1
l '. l.
Improvement Program is not substantially changed from previous proposals;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section
1.
Program
Adopted.
The
extended
and
revised
Transportation Improvement Program and Arterial Street Improvement Plan for
the City of Federal Way for the ensuing six (6) calendar years (1999-2004
inclusive) ,
a
copy
of
which
is
attached
hereto
as
Exhibit
A
and
incorporated
herein by
this
reference,
which
sets
forth
the
City's
transportation project locations, types of improvements and the estimated
costs thereof, is hereby approved and adopted.
Section 2.
Filing of Program.
Pursuant to Chapter 35.77 RCW,
the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of this
resolution, together with Exhibit A, with the Washington State Secretary
of Transportation and a copy with the Washington State Transportation
Improvement Board.
Section 3.
Severability.
If any section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by
a
court
of
competent
jurisdiction,
such
invalidity
or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of
any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution.
, PAGE 3
[~ --," .-~, , t\, F" T
. >",-.
, .. ~ ¿ .... '.
RES #
Section
4.
Rat if ication.
Any act
consistent
with the
authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby
ratified and affirmed.
Section
54.
Effective
Date.
This
resolution
shall
be
effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, this 7th day of July, 1998.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, RON GINTZ
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, LONDI K. LINDELL
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
6/12/98
K:\council\agdbills\1998\99-2004.res
RES #
, PAGE 4
DRAFT
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM# -:JliL' (c~ J
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""".""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
...§Y..~~~ Ç!.;.... ...ç. ~.~.ç.~ !!~.~Q.~...Q.f.. ç~ ~. .ç.~~!1..çJ! ..~/ !.~ (~.~.. ~ ~g.~J ~ .~.. M.~. ~ ~~.~ g... ....... """""""""""
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
_CONSENT
ORDINANCE
_X_BUSINESS
HEARING
_FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMATION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'".....................................................................................,..............................................................."......
..
ATTACHMENTS: None
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".................................................,.....""""""""""""""""""""""""""""............
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: Mayor Gintz is recommending the City Council cancel their regular meeting scheduled
for August 18, 1998.
""""",,"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"
OTY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: (1) Council to approve suspension of rules to allow for
cancellation of August 18, 1998 regular meeting; and (2) to fu~her approve cancellation of August 18, 1998
...~~.~~~~~.=~~~~.~~:........................................................................................I~;J1..~JG%............. ...................... """'" """""""'" """""""""""
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNOL PACKET:
@~'
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNOL ACfION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
_TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACfION
COUNOL BILL #
Ist Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
1:\COVERCC-5/14/96
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM#
d!1LÚ~
......................................................................................................."'......."'."""""'..""""."""'."."""""""'."""'.""""""""""""" ..........................
..................
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
...~Y..!I..~ç.!.;......P.Jy"~.~~.~.~..çQ~.~.!~.~J~!!..~P.PQ~!!!~.~~~J~.................. ........................................ ...........................
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
_CONSENT
_ORDINANCE
X BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMA nON
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
..................................................... ............................................... ............................................. .......... ...........................
....................................... .......................
ATTACHMENTS: None
.............................................................................................""""""""".................................................................................................
....................................
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The rull Council will be interviewing applicants at a special meeting on July 7, and will
make their recommendation for the appointments ofthree (3) commissioners and one (1) alternate to the city's Diversity
Commission at the regular meeting.
... ........................ ......................... ...................................... ................................................ ........ ................... ..............
...... .............. ................... ........... ...............
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None
... .......................................................................... ..... ............................ ........... ........................................................
................ ......................................... ..........
:~=~~~~~~:: ~:~~:~~::_.~.:.:~.~::~~::: .[Z¡Z;;¿::~:i~~:i~~ :::i~~i:~::~
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNOL PACKET:
/JI
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED
DENIED
T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNOL BILL #I
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE ##
RESOLUTION #I
"
1:\COVERCC.S/14/96
MEETING DATE: July 7,1998
ITEM# -:iLL ~J
""""""'.""""""""""""""""""""""'........................................."""""""""""""""-"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""....................................................".
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
...~Y..~.J:~ ç J>.....¥.tÞ.J Ç.~. .~.Q .~! ~.. A P.P.Qt~.!~ ~!l.!~... """""""""""""""'" """"""""""""'" """"""""'" """""" """"""""'"
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
_CONSENT
ORDINANCE
_X_BUSINESS
_HEARING
FYI
_RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
- PROCLAMATION
- STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""---""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""'.................................................."...
ATTACHMENTS: None
""""""""""""""""""""'..""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'."""""
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The full Council will be interviewing applicants at a special meeting on July 7, and will
make their recommendation for the appointments of one (1) board member and one (1) alternate to the city's Ethics Board
at the regular meeting.
..........."..........................................................."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""
CITY COUNOL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"""""""""""""""""""""""'"
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: To approve the appointments to the Ethics Board as
r~~~==~~~e~~: t~~ ~ o:r~ O~:~I~:m...@Ô ((~.m m
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNOL PACKET: Jt-.
(BELOW TO BE COlvfPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNOL ACfION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
- T ABLEDIDEFERRED/NO ACfION
COUNOL BILL ##
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION ##
I:\COVERCC-S/14196
MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998
ITEM# ß.!- W
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""",,""""""""""""""""""""""""'"
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
...~~~!~.~.!~........~.~~ !..~.~. ~.~.~.~.~. .~.. (~.~~.~ .?~ J. ~~? j .~~~. .~.~.~.~~....... """""""""""""""""""""""""" ...,........ ....... ... """"""""'" ........ .....
CATEGORY:
BUDGET IMPACT:
CONSENT
ORDINANCE
X BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMA TION
STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted: $
Expenditure Amt: $
Contingency Reqd: $
..m...."""""""",""""""""""""""'""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..........................
ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum to the July 6,1998 meeting of the Land Use and
........ .......,... ...... .......... ""'" ............! ~~.~~ P'?~.~~.i.?~..~.?!?~ ~.~~~~. ... ............................... """,,"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" .....
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: This item was presented to you and was approved for Award to Stan
Palmer Construction, Inc. on June 1, 1998. Due to the reluctance of Stan palmer Construction, Inc.
To enter into a contract with the City for the construction of the above referenced project and in an
effort to potentially save project costs, the City rejected all bids and rebid the project.
On June 29, 1998, the City received one bid on the referenced project rebid. The low-bid contractor for
this project is Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc., with a total bid amount of $1,429,377.61. As an
aside, Pivetta was the second low bid on the initial project bid. This bid amount is 10% lower than the
average bid of the three lowest bidders combined of the first bidding process, and 6.5 % higher than the
engineer's estimated construction cost for this project (see attached rebid tabulation).
Based on the reference checks completed by CH2M HILL, Inc., the City's Design Consultant on this
project, and by City staff, there is no known reason why this low bidder should not be able to
successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction.
.....................,......................................."""""""","""""""""""""""""'"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""...,..................
........................................................................... .....................................................................................
.........................................................................
The project budget status is as follows:
Design
$ 195,900.00
Acquisition
$ 47,000.00
Construction Management
$ 214,700.00
Construction
$1,572,315.37
10% Construction Contingency
$ 142,937.76
Total Project Costs
$2,029,915.37
Council Authorized Budget
$1,853,356.00
Costs - Budget
$ 176,559.37
The estimated project shortfall ($176,559.37) is due to a two year construction delay and includes the
10% construction contingency in the amount of $142,937.76.
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Land Use/Transportation Committee
recommends that the project budget be amended by a budget increase in the amount of $176,559.37.
The Committee also recommends the award of this project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder,
Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,429,377.61 and that a 10% construction
contingency totaling $142,937.76 be established for the project.
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
~...:...................................
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: ~";T" {~~ ~-cv..vvv-.~'- .,-.,
. ..~~.;~~~~~. .;~~..~~ ~~.~.~.~.~~.~.. ~~.~~ ~.~..; ~ ~~ ;;"."......qÐÞ ..............oooooooo ..oo............... "'OO""""."OO.."".........OO'
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CIlY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNCIL ACTION:
APPROVED
DENIED
TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACTION
CO UN CIL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
K:\COUNCIL\AGDBILLS\1998\BELMORBI.A WD
CITY OF ..
..-- ED~
~~~
DATE:
July 1, 1998
TO:
Phil Watkins, Chair
Land Use/Transportation Committee
Jeff Pratt, Surface Water Manage~
SeaTac Phase I (Belmor) RFB98-107 "Rebid" - Authority to Award Bid
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Background:
This item was presented to you and was approved for A ward to Stan Palmer Construction, Inc.
on June 1, 1998. Due to the reluctance of Stan palmer Construction, Inc. To enter into a contract
with the City for the construction of the above referenced project and in an effort to potentially
save project costs, the City rejected all bids and rebid the project.
On June 29, 1998, the City received one bid on the referenced project rebid. The low-bid
contractor for this project is Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc., with a total bid amount of
$1,429,377.61. As an aside, Pivetta was the second low bid on the initial project bid. This bid
amount is 10 % lower than the average bid of the three lowest bidders combined of the first
bidding process, and 6.5 % higher than the engineer's estimated construction cost for this project
(see attached rebid tabulation).
Based on the reference checks completed by CH2M HILL, Inc., the City's Design Consultant on
this project, and by City staff, there is no known reason why this low bidder should not be able
to successfully complete this project to the City's satisfaction.
The project budget status is as follows:
Design
$ 195,900.00
Acquisition
$ 47,000.00
Construction Management
$ 214,700.00
Construction
$1,572,315.37
10% Construction Contingency
$ 142,937.76
Total Project Costs
$2,029,915.37
Council Authorized Budget
$1,853,356.00
Costs - Budget
$ 176,559.37
The estimated project shortfall ($176,559.37) is due to a two year construction delay and includes
the 10% construction contingency in the amount of $142,937.76.
Recommendations:
Staff recommends that the project budget be amended by a budget increase in the amount of
$176,559.37. Staff recommends the award of this project to the lowest responsive, responsible
bidder, Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc., in the amount of $1,429,377.61 and that a 10%
construction contingency totaling $142,937.76 be established for the project. In addition, staff
recommends that this matter be placed on the July 7, 1998 City Council meeting consent agenda
for their consideration.
K: \L UTC\1998 IBELREBID. WPD
4
MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998
ITEM#
VII ( ~)
--
........................................................................"....................."""""""""""""""""'---"""'.........................,......................................................
...........,............
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
...§ y.~.~~ç .!.;...!!: ~ g ~~.~.~~.. ç ~Y.~.~~. ~.~.~.~..~...¥J.~.~.~.~~................... """"""""""""""""""""'" ............................ ....... .....
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
- CONSENT
ORDINANCE
t/ BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
_RESOLUTION
_STAFF REPORT
PROCLAMATION
_STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt:
Contingency Reqd:
.........................................................................,...........................................................................................".................................
...............................,............
ATTACHMENTS:(l) Letter dated 4/29/98 to Suburban Cities Association from Mayor Ron Gintz,
(2) Letter dated 4/21/98 to County Executive Ron Sims from Mayor Gintz, (3) Letter to King
County Councilmembers McKenna and Nickels from SCA President Chuck Booth, (4) RG&F Work
Group List, (5) Draft Suburban Cities Policy Paper dated 6/24/98 and (6) Suburban Cities
Questionnaire on Regional Governance & Finance Plan Response Summary.
.......",......................................................................................................................................................................................,.......
............................................
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: See attached memo.
.........................................................................".............................................................................................................................
................................"..........
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Accept staff presentation.
:~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: ~~ :~~~~~~ ~~::~: ~i:~::::~i;ð :¡~::::
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNOL PACKET: J1jò "
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNOL ACTION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
_TABLEDillEFERRED/NO ACTION
COUNOL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
crrY OF ,...-..
. EI:J~
~~ AY"
DATE:
1 July 1998
TO:
City Council
Philip D. Keightley, Deputy City Manager JiiD
FROM
SUBJECT:
Regional Governance & Fmance
In March 1998, the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) approved a draft Regional
Governance and Finance (RG&F) proposal for public comment. The City Council approved the
attached letters to King County Executive Ron Sims dated April 21, 1998 and to Suburban Cities
Association (SCA) President Mary Gates dated April 29, 1998 as preliminary response to the
GMPC RG&F proposal. The latter letter is very similar to the subsequent letter also attached that
was sent by SCA to King County.
The SCA is preparing an alternative RG&F proposal. In order to meet the needs of all suburban
cities, the SCA sent out a questionnaire to all cities. The responses from 30 of the 36 cities are
attached. The SCA work group (see attached list of names) is using the questionnaire responses
as the basis for preparing the alternative SCA proposal.
As a part of the SCA proposal, SCA wanted to focus on the urban subsidy. The SCA consultant,
Ann Pflug, prepared the attached June 24, 1998 draft Financing of Regional and Local Services
RG&F plan policy paper for SCA. The last pages of this outlines a possible direction that the SCA
RG&F work group may recommend as a financing plan for the consideration of all cities.
The SCA RG&F work group plans to meet July 3 and 6. The SCA Board meets July 15 to review
their recommendations before sending them to all cities for review and comment. It is likely that
the cities will have the last two weeks of July to review the SCA alternative RG&F proposal. All
cities comments will be then summarized and sent to the GMPC as the SCA alternative RG&F
proposal.
"
ED ERAL
~ 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
(253) 661-4000
FEDERAL WAY. WA 98003-6210
~') '2 '1, IC¡(?~I
(253) 661-4013
Mary Gates, President
Suburban Cities Association
9611 S.E. 36th Street
Mercer Island, WA 98040-3732
Re:
Growth Management Planning Council's March 13, 1998 Regional Governance and
Finance Proposal
Dear Ms. Gates:
On Apri120, 1998, the Federal Way City Council reviewed the March 13, 1998 Growth Management
Planning Council ("GMPC") proposal on Regional Governance and Finance ("RG&F"). The Council
determined that the proposal was not acceptable to the City of Federal Way, for reasons stated
generally in an April 21, 1998 letter to Ron Sims (attached).
A special ad hoc Council Committee and all members of the City Council's RG&F Committee then
met on April 28, 1998, to further review and discuss the proposal. Our Committee identified a
number of specific deficiencies in the RG&F proposal, and discussed ways in which those deficiencies
could be remedied. They are as follows:
.
The CUITent County proposal contemplates the transfer of substantial funds ITom the
cities to King County. The County has stated that this "urban subsidy" is not subject
to negotiation. Federal Way strongly believes that there are several appropriate
circumstances in which funds should be transferred ITom the County to the cities
because of the amount of the urban subsidy. The existing amount of the subsidy is
too great. The "urban subsidy" must be made subject to negotiations.
.
Delegation of responsibility for managing regional facilities to the County raises
fundamental issues of trust and expertise. The County has demonstrated a serious
inability to control costs. Its overhead and costs of service for, among other things,
court and police contracts greatly exceed the overhead and costs for cities who
provide similar services. Further, the County's costs increase annually, at a level
several times that of inflation. Any serious RG&F proposal must include discussion
of the levels of service to be provided by the County for particular services, the costs
..
Mary Gates, President
Suburban Cities Association
April 29, 1998
Page 2
of any change in level of service, cost control or reduction, and the possibility for
regional input into the level and kind of service to be provided.
.
The Potential Annexation Areas (P AA) Rural Services elements need detailed revision
as part of this proposal, and not left until after the proposal is approved and less
leverage is available. As part of this, legal review is required on the subject of
whether cities have legal authority to spend tax dollars on areas outside of their city
limits and within P AAs.
.
The proposed realignment of human services needs significant reevaluation.
.
What does $2 million/year for zoo services provide and what would be provided for
a lesser amount? Does the region have a say on the level and kinds of service to be
provided? Consider prorated contributions based on proximity.
Our Council has many more specific concerns. The GMPC proposal requires substantial revision at
the threshold level. We request that the SCA incorporate these remarks into a consolidated response
on behalf of its members. We would be happy to assist the SCA with its preparation; just let us
know. In the meantime, we plan to move forward with preparation of an individual Federal Way
response, to be submitted to the GMPC prior to their June 3 deadline.
"
Thank you for the consideration of the above.
rd~?J-
Ron Gintz
Mayor
RLG:emr
Attachment
cc: City Councilmembers
City Manager
K:llel1crlrq¡govfn.pro
(253) 661-4000
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003-6210
The Honorable Ron Sims
King County Executive
Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
King County Court House
Fourth and James Street
Seattle, Waslúngton 98104-3272
April 21, 1998
Re:
Regional Governance and Finance
Dear Executive Sims:
The Federal Way City Council on April 21, 1998, unanimously agreed that the Growth
Management Planning Council's (GMPC) March 13,1998, Regional Governance & Finance
(RG&F) proposal that provides for the first phase realignment of regional and local services is
not acceptable to the City of Federal Way as currently proposed for the following reasons:
.
The significant cost to the City for the changes to services in the GMPC RG&F proposal
is not acceptable even after considering the possible regional benefits;
The present uurban subsidy" must be addressed as the contributions provided by the
cities to King County far exceed the benefits received and is unfairly unequal. The
GMPC proposal only adds to tills imbalance; and,
.
The City will not agree to the transfer of services to King COW1ty until the City can be
assured that the County's cost of providing the services and the overhead to provide
them is less than if the services are provided locally or by a contractor; and, that the
quality of Ùle services will likely be improving over time.
The City of Federal Way is initiating a process to review in detail the GMPC RG&F proposal so
that the GMPC can be provided with specific modifications to the proposal by the GMPC's
deadline of JW1e 3, 1998. These modifications will be coordinated with ù1e Suburban Cities
Association (SCA).
Sincerely,
.J
frfi~~
Ronald L. Gintz
Mayor
COUNCfL\RG98.020pb
c
GtyC""".:;!
.,t>ru¡:<f1'<n' Tc~m
sc.'\
ATTACHMENT A
Honorable Rob McKenna
Honorable Greg Nickels
King County Council
I
I:
Re:
SCA Interests for Discussion at Moving King County 2000
Dear Councilmembers McKenna and Nickels:
On behalf of the Suburban Cities Association, I am writing to thank you for your leadership in
calling for a conference, Moving King County 2000, oflocal elected officials to discuss the
enactment and use of local option transportation revenues. All local jurisdictions are in need of
additional funds to meet transportation needs critical to maintaining the region's economic well-
being and high quality of life and a local option gas tax could provide a guaranteed source of
funds to begin to address these needs. Suburban Cities Association members have identified a
number of interests for discussion at the June 23 conference.
.
Local jurisdictions are willing to do their share to secure adequate transportation funding for
local needs, but wish to do so with assurances trom the State Legislature that they will
aggressively work toward resolving state funding needs beyond Referendum 49.
.
If there is support for a local option gas tax, cities prefer to retain local control of how these
funds are spent consistent with the current law, as even relatively small amounts of revenue
can provide opportunities to address important needs.
.
Local jurisdictions have a long history of cooperation (through interlocal agreements) to
jointly fund projects with their neighbors and to fund projects of regional importance. Local
control of any potential local option revenues would provide additional opportunities for
jointly funded projects and other projects oflocal importance.
.
With Referendum 49 and Initiatives 690 and 691 related to transportation funding already on
the November ballot, actions to proceed to the voters with a local option gas tax should be
delayed until after November to avoid further voter confusion and to better understand the
impacts the votes on these measures would have on support for a local option gas tax.
We look forward to discussing these and other issues at Moving King County 2000.
Sincerely,
Chuck Booth
SCA President
c: King County Executive Ron Sims
King County Councilmembers
King County Public Works Directors
SCA
~GIONAL GOVERNANCE & FINANCE
WORK GROUP
I
,
í
'-
.cted Officials
Mayor Wally Rants, Tukwila
Councilmember Debbie Eddy, Kirkland
Mayor Jesse Tanner, Renton
Mayor Jim White, Kent
Mayor Scott Jepsen, Shoreline
Mayor Erselle Eade, Hunts Point
Mayor Rosemarie Ives, Redmond
Deputy Mayor Shirley Thompson, SeaTac
Council President Bob Edwards, Renton
SCA
President Mary Gates, Federal Way
Vice President Chuck Booth, Auburn
SedTres Judy Clibborn, Mercer Island
Staff
Steve Bauer, Bellevue
~n Reed, Bellevue
Bob Dies, Shoreline
Linda Herzog, Redmond
Brent Me Fall, Kent
Jay Covington, Renton
Manny Ocampo, Bothell
Rich Conrad, Mercer Island
Lynda Ring Erickson, SCA
Rob Odle, Consultant
Anne Pflug, Consultant
GMPC
Mayor Howard Botts, Black Diamond
Mayor Mike Creighton, Bellevue
Mayor George Rossman, Enumclaw
Councilmember Sally Nelson, Burien
Couneilmember Trish Borden, Auburn
206-433-1850
425-827-4574
425-235-2580
253-859-3359
206-546-1700
425-451-8245
425-556-2101
253-824-7677
206-682-6261
253-661-4013
253-931-3041
206-232-8941
425-452-6810
425-452-6837
206-546-1503
425-556-2102
253-859-3359
425-235-2580
425-486-3256
206-236-5300
206-236-7676
206-248-5501
425-486-1869
360-886-2560
425-452-7810
360-802-0226
206-243-8030
253-931-3037
Mayor John Wiltse, Normandy Park' 206-248-7603
Council member Sandy Guinn, Bothell 425-486-3256
Councilmember Rebecca Clark, Covington 253-638-1110
L/-h- 7
(
1
(,',
DRAFT
Financing of Regional and Local Services
Regional Governance and Finance Plan
Suburban Cities Policy Paper
June 24,1998
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy paper is to:
1. Provide an overview of King County finances and how they are effected by
annexation/in corp oration
2. Evaluate the amount and content of the "Urban Subsidy"
3. Determine the amount of ' 'urban subsidy" that Suburban Cities and Seattle
could expect to have redirected to regional services as unincorporated urban
areas annex or incorporate
4. Propose a financing plan for Phase I of the RFG process for regional and local
services and the requirements within P AA' s
5. Provide a "balance sheet" for suburban cities under the proposed financing
pbn .
OVERVIEW OF KING COUNTY FINANCES
This section of the Policy Paper provides basic facts about King County Finances in a
question / answer format. It is designed so that the reader can quickly grasp the
information presented.
At a high level what is the basic structure of the County's budget?
The King County budget is organized in a different manner than most city budgets. The
County has a much larger number of funds that track revenues and expenses for CmDlty
operations in addition to the County's General or Current Expense fund. Below is a table
that helps to show the similarities and differences between the County and City budgets.
CITY AND COUNTY BUDGET STRUCTURE
BY KEY FUND AND REVENUE TYPES
(JT ALlCS HIGHLIGHT DIFFERENCES)
Fund type Typical City Fund Key City Revenues County Fund Key County
Names Names Revenues
Operating . Current . Property, criminal . Current . Property and
Expense or justice and general Expense Sales Tax
General Fund sales tax . Contract
. Utility or business paY11l e II ts
taxes I
c.
. Street Fund
. Park and
Recreation
Fund
Enterprise
. Water Utility
. Garbage
Utility
. Storm Water
Utility
. Sewer Utility
. Recreation
Fac' .
. Facilities
. Insurance
. Equipment
Rep lacement
. Computers and
communication
s
. Employee
Benefits
Internal
Service
. State shared per
capita revenue
. Licenses and permits
. Fees and fines
. Reimbursement
from other funds for
services
. Gas tax
. Fees
. Part of Property or
Sales Tax bv Council
policy
. Rate revenues
. Vendor income
. Payments from user
departments of City
government
2
. Criminal Justice
State Shared
. Licenses and
permits
. Fees and fines
. Reimbursement
from other funds
for services
. Criminal . CJ Sales Tax
Justice . RE Excise Taxes
. Substance . State and
Abuse Federal
. Develop menta apportionments
I Disabilities or grants for
. Mental Heahh OlJerations
. EMS . Soecial prooerty
. Public Heahh tax levies
. Work . Fees
Training. Gas Tax
. Surface Water. County Road
Management Property Tax
. County Road Lm
. CDBG . Contract
. REET ~ents
. Development. Permit fees
& . Mitigation
Environmenta payments
I Services
. Solid Waste
. Boeing Field
. Kingdom
. Metro Transit
. Metro Transit
. Facilities
. Insurance
. Equipment
Replacement
. Computers
and
Communicati
ons
. E 10 ee
. Rate revenues
. Lease income
. Contract fees
. Vendor income
. Payments from !
user departments
of County
government
(
(
3
Benefits I
. Printing
. FinaJlCe and
Budf!et
Capital . Arterial Street . Gas tax . Capital . Gas tax
Project .. Fund Mitigation funds Projects Mitigation funds
. .
. Capital . General Taxes, Funds for . General Taxes,
Projects FWlds grants or rate individual grants or rate
revenues allocated operations revenues
by Council thru CIP allocated by
. REET Council thru CIP
. Bond proceeds . REET
. Bond proceeds
Debt . . Fund for each . Property tax or other . Fund for each . Property tax or
servtce bond issue designated revenue bond issue other designated
revenue
What is the size and composition of King County's overall budget?
To get a picture of the King County budget size and proportion I have used the same fund
category breakdown as above in a table that shows the proportion of revenues for the
various parts of the County's activities.
ALLOCATION OF KING COUNTY REVENUES
1998 BUDGET
FUND TYPE COUNTY FUND 1998 BUDGETED PERCENTAGE OF
NAMES REVENUE S TOTAL
($1,000's)
Operating $395,005 15%
Current Expense $395,005
and Misc. Operating
Special Revenue $520,809 19.8%
Criminal Justice, $35,241
AFIS and E911
Developmental $96,897
Disabilities and
Mental Health
EMS $24,948
Public Heahh $145,267
Work Training $4,034
Surface Water $31,300
Management
County Road $82,090
CDBG $16,794
(
4
REET $13,049
Development & $27,927
Environmental
Services
Hazardous Waste $9,045
Other $34.217
Enterprise $577,140 22%
Solid Waste $63,803
Boeing Field $8,543
Kingdom $12,943
Metro Transit $316.343
Metro Wastewater $175,508
Intenuù Service ... $225,659 8.6%
.
Facilities $22,298
Insurance $19.914
Equipment $53,240
Replacement
Computers and $24,955
Communications
Employee Benefits . $84,886
Printing $2,649
Finance and Budget $17,717
Capital Project $679,890 25.8%
Capital Projects $679,890
Funds for individual
operations
Debt Service $230,449 8.8%
Fund for each bond $230,449
issue
TOTAL $2,628,952 100%
Where do the major County taxes come from?
Below are t~bles that show the proportion of the two major sources of County taxes that
are derived fÌom within unincorporated areas, suburban cities and Seattle.
~~~ ~c ~;~~~~~~~~~~~~ ?~~~ ~, ~::~ 9:~ ~f, ~? ~: ~i~Ç~~~~;~ ~ ~~$" ;~~
,':~;""::.'..f:~~~~~'!,c~}(~~. .~R9~~R:~ TAX ,CQLLECTIONS .'. .
KING COUNTY GOVERNMENT
C.'
it ,~96:.- ~ 1: ~ T M5R ep E 00: [) 1 ~~ ~~~..;
'.",.,.,..,.-..- ~">"-"',"-;-""'>r",?"'",,=.""""=;"","".i'~' ;:-"~=-~".~7."'M.,."
Unincorporated
Suburban Cities
Seattle
KING COUNTY TOTAL
$58,500,000
100%
KING COUNTY GOVERNMENT
:'~~:r.~~~~.~~P..RQ.~E.~~~:r:~~;'~;~~f;~{i;:~ ;:.:;~;êÔÙettiônš~;;< : ~:-~:,:.:ci:
RECI;:.IV.E;.D BV:'AREA:..~~::~.'.;î;i;';;";:!l~i~A";:~.:'~,,!-,j~ .:~~:.i..:S:::'~'~::::':~f:i:.;ro'7:!:: " .:--:¡.:J.,.;.
Unincorporated $43,967,037 20%
Suburban Cities $102.316,052 46%
Seattle $75,493,388 34%
KING COUNTY GENERAL LEVY TOTAL
$221,774,162
100%
(
What happens to the County's revenues when unincorporated areas annex or
incorporate?
The table below list King County's major revenues and what happens to them with
annexation or incorporation.
KING COUNTY REVENUES
EFFECTED BY ANNEXATION OR INCORPORA nON
REVENUE UNINCORPORATED AFTER
COUNTY INCORPORATION
CURRENT
EXPENSE FUND
COUNTY GENERAL 100% TO COUNTY 100% TO COUNTY;
PROPERTY TAX CITY ALSO HAS
SEPARATE LEVY
SALES TAX 100% TO COUNTY 15% TO COUNTY;
. 85% TO CITY
FEES FOR 100% TO COUNTY GOES TO CITY IF
RECREATION, CITY OFFERS
COURT, POOLS PROGRAMS; MAY
GO TO COUNTY AS
PART OF
CONTRACT FEE
5
(
(
6
FRANCIllSES AND 100% TO COUNTY 100% TO CITY
LICENCES
GAMBLING TAXES 100% TO COUNTY 100% TO CITY
OTHER COUNTY
FUND S
ROAD DISTRICT 100% TO COUNTY WHEN C ITY
PROPERTY TAX PROPERTY TAX
LEVY IS IN PLACE
TIllS TAX IS NO
LONGER
COLLECTED (1)
CRIMINAL mSTICE 10% of all funds collected in No change.
SALES TAX County
STORM WATER 100% TO COUNTY 100% TO CITY
MANAGEMENT FEES UNLESS
CONTRACTED TO
COUNTY
REET 100% TO COUNTY 100% TO CITY
LAND USE AND 100% TO COUNTY NEW PERMIT
BUILDING PERMITS REVENUE WOULD
GO TO CITY
(1) Cities receive Road District Tax levy after annexation/incorporation until City general property tax
levy begins collections.
(2) Cities receive state shared revenues (MVET, gas tax, liquor taxes and sales tax equalization) after
incorporation. They may also collect Utility tax, B&O tax, and optional County vehicle licence fee for
streets if they are ~nacted by the City. The County receives limited state shared revenues - a little liquor tax
and MVET that support Health and human services, the County continues to receive gas tax.
What responsibilities does the County retain and what resposibilites do they lose
when an area is annexed?
The table below displays both revenues and service responsibility changes with
annexation.
REVENUES AND SERVICE RESPONSffiIL TIES FOR KING COUNTY
BEFORE AND AFTER INCORPORATION
(Services that chaD.2e in italics)
RE VENUE BEFORE SERVICE AFfE R SERVICE
INCORP ATION RESPONSffiILITY INCORPORA- RESPONSffiILITY
TION
CURRENT
EXPENSE
FUND
(
7
COUNfY 100% TO . Council and 100% TO . Council and
GENERAL COUNfY Executive COUNfY; Executive
PROPERTY . Adm'¡ni~ation CITY ALSO . Admini~ation
TAX . Tax Assessment HAS . Tax Assessment
. Elections and SEPARATE . Elections and
Records LEVY Records
SALES TAX 100% TO . Parks and 15% TO . Targeted Human
COUNTY Recreation COUNTY; 85% Services
. Animal Control TO CITY . Superior Court
FEES FOR 100% TO . DDES subsidy GOES TO CITY . Felony Prosecutor,
RECREATIO COUNTY . Targeted Human IFCITY Jail and Defense
N, COURT, Services OFFERS . Juvenile Court,
POOLS . Land Use PROGRAMS; Detention and
Planning MAY GO TO Intervention
COUNTY AS
. Jail PART OF
. Sheriff CONTRACT
Prosecutor and FEE
FRANCmSES 100% TO Defense 100% TO CITY
AND COUNTY . District and
LICENCES Superior Court .
GAMBLING 100% TO . Juvenile Court, 100% TO CITY
TAXES COUNTY Detention and
Intervention
. Contribution to
CIP
OTHElt
COUNIY
FUND S
ROAD 100% TO . Road WHEN C 1TY None
DISTRICT COUNTY Maintenance PROPERTY
PROPERTY . Street Repair TAX LEVY IS
TAX . Transportation IN PLACE TInS
system planning TAX IS NO
. Street LONGER
Improvement COLLECTED
. Signal. sign and (1)
street lif!ht system
CRIMJN AL 10 % of all funds Helps fund Criminal No change. Helps fund Criminal
JUSTICE collected in Justice Services in Justice Services
SALES TAX County the Current Expense primarily in the
Fund Current ExPense Funq
STORM 100% TO Storm water system 100% TO CITY None
8
(
WATER COUNTY planning, UNLESS
MANAGEME maintenance. CONTRACfED
NT FEES development review TO COUNTY
and constroction
REET 100% TO Parks and sports 100% TO CITY None
COUNTY fields acquisition and
development
LAND USE 100% TO Development and NEW PERMIT Complete permits
AND COUN1Y building permits RE VENUE submitted prior to
BUILDING WOULD GO incorporation.
PERMITS TO CITY
(1) Cities receive Road District Tax levy after annexation/incorporation until City general property tax
levy begins collections.
(2) Cities receive state shared revenues (MVET, gas tax, liquor taxes and sales tax equalization) after
incorporation. They may also collect Utility tax, B&O tax, and optional County vehicle licence fee for
streets if they are enacted by the City. The County receives limited state shared revenues - a little liquor tax
and MVET that support Health and human services, the County continues to receive gas tax.
What did County property taxes collected in Cities pay for in 1997?
A number of elected officials wanted to know what the property taxes that are paid to the
county each year buy for their citizens. Below is a table that attempts to layout the types
of services and facilities that the property taxes collected from every city resident by the
county pay for.
WHERE DO MY COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES GO?
FUND Amount of General County Services
Property Tax Allocated in
1997 ($I,OOO's)
Current Expense $154,284 . Council and Executive
. Administration
. Tax Assessment
. Elections and Records
. Targeted Human
Services
. Superior Court
. Felony Prosecutor, Jail
and Defense
. Juvenile Court,
Detention and
Intervention
. Subsidy for Special
Revenue funds that are
not self supporting --
permitting, human
services and health
Human Services $3,155 Mental Health services
(
9
Veterm's Aid $1,420 Services for veteran's
River Improvement $2,000 Flood prevention
improvements
Bond Redemption $21,210 Conservation Futures Open
Space land purchase
TOTAL $182, 071
10
(
URBAN SUBSIDY EVALUATION
Why would suburban cities be concerned about an "Urban Subsidy"?
"In the simplest terms, urban subsidies exist when taxpayers in incorporated cities are
taxed to provide services for residents and businesses in unincorporated areas."
(Gardiner, pg. 3)
The suburban cities are interested in this issue for three reasons:
. The financial inequities that subsidizing unincorporated area public services
impose on City residents and businesses;
. A subsidy ofunincorporated area public services increases the obstacles to
annexation or incorporation ofunincorporated urban areas into adjacent cities
- perpetuating inefficient service delivery, development patterns and public
facilities;
. A subsidy promotes County local service delivery patterns that are costly and
interfere with the County's focus on its countywide regional service delivery
responsibilities.
What do all the reports and letters about Urban Subsidy really mean?
In recent years the Cities and the County have commissioned jointly and individually
studies of the "Urban Subsidy" and corollary issues in order to attempt to define the
amount of subsidy. Armed with information about the scope of the subsidy the Cities
and the County could then make policy and service delivery decisions that would
eliminate or substantially reduce the subsidy and its effects.
Below is a summary of the major points from each report or relevant issue paper /
statement and an evaluation of their content.
McIntire Report (April 1997. Commissioned by GMPC)
The McIntire report is a case study which attempted to project the County's future
financial position and define and project the amount of the urban subsidy over the life of
the current GMA planning period (1992 - 2012). The consultant analyzed County
revenue and expenditure trends and created a financial model to project revenues,
expenses and the subsidy through the year 2012 using a set of assumptions about revenue
growth, county service levels, population growth and annexation. The report focused on
three funds - Current Expense, Criminal Justice, and Road.
The base year from which all projections were made was 1995. Prior to the base year the
County and Metro had been merged and significant incorporation and annexation activity
had already taken place. The County has changed its approach to annexation and
incorporation becoming a major contract service provider among the newer cities.
Between 1995 and 1998 additional incorporation and major annexation has occUlTed
(Maple Valley, Covington, Kenmore incorporations~ Kent and Lake Forest Park
11
(
annexations). The County also renegotiated its largest contract (for Policing) with its
contract cities, changing its contracting and pricing approach significantly.
In order to make projections the report used a set of key assumptions. The report
projected future County expenses and revenues using a constant ratio of County full time
employees (FfE) to population and a constant tax rate based on 1995. These
assumptions were modified by pricing assumptions for contract or overhead services (for
each price increase of 10%, 3% less service was purchased from the County) and an
assumption about decreases in federal revenue (10% overall from 1995 to 2012).
Annexation and incorporation was projected to move 237,122 out of 364,400 urban
unincorporated residents into cities by 2012, leaving 127, 278 or 35% still in urban
unincorporated areas and 155,000 in rural unincorporated areas (based on Rural Subsidy
Issue Paper 5/18/98). By 199870,000 more residents were already incorporated or 29%
of the projection in 3 years.
McIntyre then allocated revenues and expenses to regional services, unincorporated
municipal services, contract municipal services, municipal services in cities and federal
contracts.
Important conclusions include:
. The County FfE to population ratio increased by 12.2% between 1990 and 1995 after
the effect of the METRO merger is deducted.
. At the 1995 ratio of County employee FfE to population County revenues would
exceed County expenses by $92 Million in the year 2012 (in constant 1995 dollars)
and $70 Million in the year 2000.
. In 1995 the County spent more to provide municipal services in both unincorporated
and incorporated areas than those areas generate in revenue.
. In 1995 the County spent more to provide contract municipal services in cities than
those cities provided in contract payments to the County.
. There are significant shifts in County service delivery patterns. Between 1992 and
2012 the County's service population in unincorporated areas shrinks while the
County's service population for regional services grows. The County has provided a
growing amount of municipal service within cities, mostly by contract.
. When all Current Expense sales tax revenue is assigned to support unincorporated
municipal services between $8.9 and $11.2 Million more revenue is needed to support
unincorporated services at the 1995 FfE to population level. When only sales tax
revenue originating in unincorporated areas is assigned to support unincorporated
municipal services $50.9 million more revenue is needed to support unincorporated
servIces.
12
(
. Total Current Expense Fund expenses in the unincorporated area for 1995 were
estimated at $85 Million. Approximately $20 Million in expenses for the rural
unincorporated area (based on 5/18/1998 Rural Subsidy Issue Paper) and $65 Million
was for the urban unincorporated area.
Reviewing the report raises some issues that may effect the conclusions. The key issues
are:
(1) The assumption about the level of capital investment by the County between 1995
and the year 2012 both overall and as it effects the amount of property tax revenue
available to the Current Expense fund for service delivery.
(
The projections of capital investment by the County between 1995 and 2012 were $427
Million in 2000 and $503 Million in 2012 (constant 1995 dollars). This investment level
was intended to represent an averaging of cyclical highs and lows adjusted for reduced
unincorporated area responsibilities and increased regional responsibilities. The actual
average scheduled investment in the 1998 County CIP over six years is $364 Million
(1998 dollars) 15 to 20% less. Ifplanned levels of investment have decreased a
disproportionate amount of revenue would have been allocated to capital and not
available for operations in the projections especially in funds such as Road and Storm
Water Management. Actual County policy may be moving funds fiom capital to
operations or reserves. Funding that in part might be available for investment in
unincorporated urban area infrastructure.
Total property tax revenue to the County in 1995 was $273 Million. Of that amount $142
Million went to the Current Expense Fund, $44 Million to the Road Fund, $6 Million to
special revenue funds including mental health, approximately $20 Million to debt service
for capital projects and the balance to voter approved purposes like EMS and Regional
Justice Center construction. In addition, the Current Expense fund contributed $5 Million
toward capital projects in the CIP in 1995.
Allocation of property tax revenue to capital investment is a policy decision that reduces
the amount ofproperty tax revenue available for service delivery. Decreasing the amount
ofproperty tax directed the CIP would increase the amount available for operations
having the effect of increasing regional revenues.
(2) The amount of sales tax revenue assigned to support unincorporated municipal
services.
The McIntire Report does not reach a conclusion about the Urban Subsidy or even define
it. After allocating all Current Expense Fund sales tax revenues to support
unincorporated municipal services the report implies that there is a relatively small
subsidy of up to $11 Million dollars needed. One could even go the next step and imply
that this subsidy is offset by the amount of subsidy needed to cover the net loss incurred
in municipal service contract costs where the County provides services in cities.
13
c.
Even the County is no longer arguing (Sims, Sullivan and Vance letter to Steering
Committee 5/28/97) that the sales tax beyond that generated in the unincorporated area
should be assigned to unincorporated municipal services. Using this assumption the
McIntire report would estimate the Urban Subsidy ~t $50.9 Million in 1995 dollars or
approximately $54 Million in 1998 (2% annual inflation assumed).
(3) Allocation of General Government expenses.
The County has the difficult job of determining what portion of its general government
services should be paid for by general tax dollars and what parts are the responsibility of
other funds. Special revenue, capital and enterprise funds as well as direct services
funded from the current expense fund all share in paying for general government services
in the county's financial plan. General Government includes computer and telephone
system costs, insurance, fucilities, records, motor poo~ finance, personnel, County
Council and Executive.
How general government services are paid for effects the amount of the urban subsidy. If
funds outside the current expense fund pay for the majority of general government
services then that leaves more funding available for regional services. In fact in 1995 $25
million dollars was collected to offset $38 million in general government expenses (Table
n - 6a, McIntire). This leaves $13 million or 34% for support by tax and other Current
Expense revenues. The current expense fund is only 18% of the total county operation.
If an increased amount of general government expense was allocated to other funds so
that the Current Fund paid 18% then $6 million more would be available for regional
services (since some of the County's non-current expense services are subsidized by the
Current Expense fund the total here would likely be less). As non-current expense fund
activities increase the share of general government services goes down, increasing
available regional revenues.
(4) Assignment of a proportion of service cost for services provided to cities to the
unincorporated areas for parks and human services.
In the McIntire study the cost of a little more than half of human services, special
programs, recreation, park maintenance and pools was allocated to the category
"municipal services in cities" a total of$12.5 Million. Whether this allocation is
appropriate given the amount of service received by city vs unincorporated citizens could
be challenged. An increase in the amount allocated to unincorporated citizens increases
the subsidy.
(5) Subsidy of regional services outside of the current expense fund from Currrent
expense revenues.
In 1995 $23 million of Current Expense revenue was used to subsidize the operations of
special revenue funds such as the Health Department, Department of Development and
Environmental Services (DDES), AFIS, Park operations and Alcohol and Substance
14
c.
Abuse services. Special revenue funds support regional (ex. Public Health) and
municipal services (ex. DDES) that have legally restricted revenue sources but usually
are not seIf supporting like Enterprise Funds. All of these expenses were allocated to
either regional ($9 million) or unincorporated municipal services ($14 million). To the
extent that the allocation is revised, over time the urban subsidy is either increased or
decreased.
(6) The assignment of responsibility for a deficit in municipal service contract services
provided by the County in Cities.
The McIntire study does not reach a conclusion about the assignment of responsibility for
the deficit to the County when municipal service contract costs exceed charges for
service. It should be noted however that the impact of a change in the County's largest
contract's pricing model occurred after the McIntire study was complete. This creates a
question about the real extent of the "deficit".
Gardiner Report (April 1997. commissioned by Suburban Cities Association)
(
The Gardiner Report is an independent analysis of the Urban Subsidy. The study focuses
on defining the amount of the Urban Subsidy given alternative sets of assumptions. The
same base year, 1995, is used to allocate County Current Expense Fund revenues and
expenses among regional services, municipal unincorporated services, contract municipal
services, municipal services provided in cities and federal contract services. The
Gardiner report does not project the future financial position of the County nor does it
look at funds outside the Current Expense Fund in its analysis.
Major conclusions:
. The report concludes that the Current Expense Fund Urban Subsidy is $36.3 Million
in 1995 dollars ($38.5 in 1998 dollars) when 20% of the sales tax collected in cities
and all of the sales tax collected in unincorporated areas is allocated to offset the cost
of municipal service provision in unincorporated King County. The Urban Subsidy
grows to $42.3 Million in 1995 dollars ($44.8 in 1998 dollars) when only the sales
taxes collected in the unincorporated area is allocated to offset the cost of services.
. Regional services cost $48 million ($50.9 in 1998 dollars) less than the available
regional revenues in 1995 when 80% of the sales tax collected in cities was allocated
to regional services and $54 million ($57.2 in 1998 dollars) when 100% of the sales
tax was allocated.
. The "additional" regional revenues were being used to subsidize both unincorporated
municipal services ($42.3 million) and other county services ($11.8 million).
. When all sales tax revenue is assigned to support unincorporated municipal services
$9.7 Million additional non-sales tax revenue is needed to support unincorporated
servlces.
15
c.
. As a result of incorporations and annexation after 1990 the County has experienced a
34% decline in sales tax revenue from the unincorporated area.
. When Human Services are considered "regional services" rather than "municipal
services" and sales tax collected in the unincorporated areas is allocated to
unincorporated service expenses - regional services have a $47.9 Million ($50.8
million in 1998) surplus of revenue; municipal services in unincorporated areas have
a deficit of$31 million ($32.9 in 1998); and municipal services in cities have a deficit
of$I1.8 million ($12.5 in 1998).
~ Subsidy Issue Paper (5/18/98 prepared by King County stafi)
The Rural Subsidy Issue Paper uses the McIntire Report approach as the basis for
calculating the amount of subsidy required to support services in the rural unincorporated
. area of King County. The paper calculates the amount of revenue and expenses
attributable to the rural area and determines the extent of the revenue shortfall or needed
subsidy to pay for the services delivered to the rural area.
1996 is used as the base year and the analysis of expenses and revenues is limited to the
Current Expense Fund. A fommla for determining the amount of rural service in each of
the key "municipal" and general government service areas is defined and then applied to
1996 total Current Expense Fund expenditures. The rural portion of ' 'regional services"
was not defined. A 1996 population of 131,000 was defined for the rural unincorporated
area.
"
Major conclusions:
. Between 1991 and 1997 the County Current Expense Fund took in less than it spent
four out of seven years. The deficit varied from 1.5% to 4.5% of expenditures.
. The public safety '1ur'a!" level of service was determined by using the staffing model
developed for municipal policing contracts. The rural area was treated as a "contract
city". Dispatched caUs for service to the rural area or % of police cases derived from
the rural population vs urban population was used as an allocator for other criminal
justice costs such as court, jail and attorney expenses.
. Parks and Human Services costs were allocated based on specific expenditures in the
rural areas line by line.
. Overhead was allocated at 5% ofthe expenses of each general government services
department for a total of$2.2 million. These expenses were offset by reimbursement
from other funds totaling $319,000 for a net expense of$1.9 million.
. The total level of rural expenditures was estimated at $22.4 million in 1996 dollars.
16
(
. Revenues including sales tax generated in the rural area to support "municipal
services" totaled $8.2 Million. Sales tax represented $5.3 Milllion of the total.
Property taxes generated in the rural area were allocated to offset "regional services".
. The amount of 1996 dollars from other sources needed to support "municipal
services" in the rural area or the "rural subsidy" was calculated to be $14.1 Million.
. The county received $40.9 million in current expense fund sales tax revenue that was
collected within cities in 1996.
Reviewing the report raises some issues that may effect the conclusions. The key issues
are:
1. Should the "rural" subsidy calculation also consider expenses and revenue from the
Criminal Justice and Road Funds?
The McIntire Report considered expenses and revenues from all three funds in evaluating
the "Urban Subsidy". When determining the level of service provided in the
unincorporated rural area it would be appropriate to review these two funds as well.
The McIntire Report found a total of$17.9 million in Criminal Justice Revenues and
$16.4 million in expenses, $4.3 million of which were allocated to the unincorporated
area. The rural area accounted for 12.7% of the public safety budget in 1996 so applying
the same ratio would add $2 million in expenses to the current expense total of$22.4,
increasing the subsidy by a like amount. The Criminal Justice sales tax totaled $10.1
million in 1995 and $10.3 million in 1997 so it is likely that the 1996 total is close to the
same amount. Regional revenues would also increase by $10 million in sales tax
revenue to a total of$50.9 million available to offset a subsidy requirement of$16.1
million (1996).
Property tax, gas taxes, vehicle licence fees and mitigation fees are the key revenues in
the Road fund. Services and capital projects are both funded fÌom these revenues and the
McIntire report allocates all the revenues and expenses to unincorporated areas since the
County is responsible for the road system only in the unincorporated area. While the
rural unincorporated area represented 30% of the unincorporated population in 1996 it
can be argued that the proportion of road miles located in the rural area is higher than
30% of all county road miles and therefore expenses are disproportionately high. I do not
have information on rural road miles or total road miles to verify this assumption.
However, the county receives 20% of its Road Fund revenue fÌom Gas Taxes which
decrease very little as a result of incorporation. It could be argued that these funds would
offset any disproportionate needs in the rural area. As a result there is likely not a
subsidy necessary for rural road services to the Road Fund.
2. Is the level of allocation of General Government or overhead expenses too high?
.
17
(
The current expense fund is 18% of total non-debt County expenses. The current
expense fund bore 34% of the cost of General Government in 1995 or $13 million. The
rural unincorporated population (8% of county total population) receives both regional
and municipal services ftom the County which would require more than their
population) s share of general government effort. Eight percent of $13 million is $1
million dollars. The Rural Subsidy Issue Paper allocates a net general government cost
of $1.9 million to the rural area or 15% of total net general government expenses.
This proportion of general costs is probably reasonable.
3. Is the Public Safety staffing model used for cities the app~opriate "rural" level of
service?
This question is key to a definition of "rural" service levels. While the rural part of the
County has a low population base it has a large land area. Rural response times are
expected to be lower than urban response times. It is likely that the staffing level to
achieve a rural response time may result in a higher FIE/population ratio than is typical
for an urban area to achieve that same lower response time due to travel distances and
land area. Whether an "urban» staffing level, as used in this model, is appropriate would
be subject to additional review. The County Council apparently has a policy of keeping
public safety staffing levels at or near 1990 levels. This date is prior to most annexation
and incorporation activity in the County and is descnòed by County staff as an
historically high level I do not know how the public safety staffing model for cities
relates to the 1990 level of service policy. If it is the same or higher however, then the
use of the staffing model is likely unreasonable. Adjusting the "rural" public safety
service level costs downward would have the effect of decreasing the rural subsidy.
Since public safety is the single largest service cost the effect could be as much as 10%.
4. Is it appropriate to use part of the Urban Subsidy to underwrite services in the rural
unincorporated part of the county?
As a policy matter, a good argument can be made for subsidizing rural service delivery
with regional revenues because rural areas provide a general benefit to the region.
Growth Management policies and implementing regulations reduce potential
development levels (and therefore potential tax revenues) for the rural area while
providing areas of open rural lands adjacent to the metropolitan area. Less densely
developed land is more expensive to serve on a per capita basis.
Urban Subsidy Letter fÌ'om Executive Sims and Councilmembers Sullivan and Vance
(dated 5/28/98)
This letter defines Urban Subsidy from the County) s perspective and proposes
reallocation of urban subsidy derived revenues to specific services.
The key conclusions from the letter are:
. The County believes that the Cities' position based on its 4/21/981etter is that the
urban subsidy be defined as "the revenue which is generated in cities and directed to
18
(
unincorporated area local service." Further the County believes that our focus is on
the 15% sales tax generated in cities which we believe should finance regional
services instead of local services in unincorporated areas.
. The County believes that the total urban subsidy is $38 million dollars (1995 dollars)
the equivalent of sales taxes collected within cities for the current expense fund ('the
15%').
. The net urban subsidy available for reallocation is $11 million (1995 dollars) after
deducting support for rural services ($14 million in 1996 dollars) and local services
provided by the County in cities (primarily human services and parks -- $13 million).
. The County would like to reallocate the remaining $11 million in revenue to cover;
1) the "full costs" of suburban cities contracts with the County $5 million
1995 dollars (from the McIntire report)
2) subsidizing "urban-level local services" in the urban unincorporated part
of the County until they are annexed by cities, after annexation the
subsidy would be used for regional services and local services in the
rural area.
. The County supports the RFG proposal before GMPC as a reasonable compromise
but is willing to carefully consider any modifications proposed by Suburban Cities
provided that additional costs to the county for one service are offset by
improvements for the County on other services.
Reviewing the letter raises some issues that may effect the conclusions. The key issues
are:
. We should reallocate net regional revenues not the urban subsidy (see next section).
Rural subsidy is one of the items that needs to be considered.
. The responsibility for contract under-pricing is the County's not the Cities' taxpayers.
Contract pricing has changed since 1995 especially for policing, so we question the
application of a $5 million cost subsidy today.
. An urban level oflocal services should be provided to unincorporated urban areas
only after annexation.
. Reallocation of regional revenues should be coupled with reduction in county local
service responsibilities related to urban unincorporated areas so that the transition
does not disrupt service levels. We are not negotiating tradeoffs in service financing
we are realigning service delivery.
. The County will be solvent with revenue to spare if it is diligent about controlling its
FfE to population ratio between now and the year 2012.
. Human Services are a regional not a local service for the following reasons:
1. The CPP's call for the County to have a key role as a regional service
provider in human services.
19
(
2. Human services are currently financed through regional and state revenues
not only in King County but most Counties in the state.
3. The state recognizes Counties as the primary government responsible for
human services.
4. The county currently provides human services to all county residents not
just unincorporated residents.
What should be the suburban cities definition of urban subsidy?
Basic concepts
In order to clarify what resources are available for the financing of the RFG plan it is
important to distinquish between three concepts introduced and liberally confused in the
financial work to date. The first concept I would like to dub "Net Regional Revenues".
These are the funds that are available ftom regional revenue sources not currently being
used to fund regional services. Regional revenues come from all county taxpayers (like
the general county property tax levy) or are generated within cities (like the 15% sales
tax).
The second concept is the "urban subsidy" which occurs. when the taxpayers in
incorporated cities are taxed to provide services for residents and businesses in
unincorporated areas. The urban subsidy could never be bigger than the amount it costs
to provide service to the unincorporated area whereas the amount of net regional revenue
available to fund regional services could far surpass funding for unincorporated areas,
especially over time as the unincorporated area shrinks. "Net Regional Revenues" could
be used in part to subsidize the unincorporated urban and mral areas and so the "urban
subsidy" is a shrinking subset of "Net Regional Revenues".
The third concept I would like to dub "Incorporation Impacted Revenues". These are
County operating and capital revenues both within and outside the County Current
Expense fund that are lost as a result of annexation or incorporation. These funds are tied
to unincorporated urban areas directly and come to the county only when the area is
unincorporated.
How much is it?
Both McIntire and Gardiner define "Net Regional Revenues" and the "Urban Subsidy",
neither attempt to define "Incorporation Impacted Revenues". First let us look at Net
Regional Rèvenues.
Net Regional Revenue
McIntire establishes $83.7 million (1998 dollars) as the amount of current expense
regional revenue not already committed to regional services when the 15% sales tax
collected in cities is assigned as a regional revenue. I would argue that all or a large part
20
(
of the Criminal Justice Fund's sales tax revenues ($10.3 million in 1997) and a smaller
CX contribution to General Government expense (initially estimated at $5 million in
1998 dollars) be added to the McIntire estimate. This modification would boost the total
of "Net Regional Revenue" to $94 million (1998 dollars).
Gardiner establishes $57.2 million (1998 dollars) as the amount of current expense
regional revenue not already committed to regional services when the 15% sales tax:
collected in cities is assigned as a regional revenue. I would argue the same two
additions to this number which would resuh in a total of $67.5 million (1998 dollars) in
"Net Regional Revenue".
An amount of ' 'Net Regional Revenues" in the $76 million ballpark (1998 dollars) would
be reasonable based on these two separate evaluations. This number will likely increase
with time as the 15% sales tax collected in cities changes.
Urban Subsidy
McIntire establishes the urban subsidy at $54 million (1998 dollars) out of a total
unincorporated services cost of$90 million (1998 dollars). All of the 15% sales tax
collected in cities plus $11 million fÌ'om other regional revenues would need to be
allocated to the subsidy.
Gardiner estimates the urban subsidy to be $44.8 million (1998 dollars) in the current
expense fund using the same assumptions about sales tax allocation. An additional
subsidy would be present in the Criminal Justice Fund of approximately $4.5 million
(1998 dollars).
An "Urban Subsidy" amount of$50 million would be reasonable based on these two
separate evaluations.
Incorporation Impacted Revenues
Incorporation Impacted Revenues are County operating and capital revenues both within
and outside the County Current Expense fund that are lost as a result of annexation or
incorporation. The following table is a rough estimate of the impact of the urban
unincorporated area moving into cities.
KING COUNIY REVENUES
EFFEcrED BY ANNEXATION OR INCORPORATION
TOTAL URBAN UNINCORPORATED AREA
REVENUE REVENUE ESTIMATE 1998DOLLARS
CURRENT ANNUAL OPERATING
EXPENSE FUND REVENUE
SALES TAX $12.3 million (1996) $12.8 million
FEES FOR $1.8 million Courts (1995) $3.7 million
21
(
RECREATION, $1.2 million Pools (1995)
COURT, POOLS $.5 million (1)
RecreationlParks (1995)
FRANCIDSES, $2.4 million Gambling (1995) $5.3 million
GAMBLING TAXES $2.6 million Cable and other
AND LICENCES licences (1995)
OTHER COUNTY
FUND S .
ROAD DISTRICT Urban portion of$50 million Same
PROPERTY TAX ave per yr spent on capital
AND OTHER ROAD $28 million in revenue for
RELATED capital ftom road fund
REVENUES annually
$34 million total ftom
mitigation over six years
(1998)
STORM WATER $12.1 capital funds total Same
MANAGEMENT FEES (1998)
Urban portion of$15.5
million in fees annually
(1998)
REET Urban portion of$12 million Same
annually committed by policy
to parks
LAND USE AND Urban portion of$5.5 million Same
BUILDING PERMITS (1998) annually
Source: Gardiner Report revenue charts for operating revenue in current expense fund;
County 1998 budget, CIP and CIP information paper for GMPC all other.
How much revenue do suburban cities and Seattle have available to reallocate?
The amount of revenue available to allocate is equivalent to "Net Regional Revenues" or
$76 million in 1998 dollars. All County taxpayers contribute to regional revenues with
City taxpayers contributing through general fees and charges, property and sales taxes
and unincorporated taxpayers contributing through general fees and charges and property
taxes. To determine how much net regional revenue suburban cities would have
available to reallocate the beginning of a simple "balance sheet" helps.
Net Re 'onal Revenues
Less: Rural Subsid 1
Sub total
Less: Ci of Seattle share 2
Remainder of regional revenue
available for reallocation
$76 000,000
$16,700,000
$59 300 000
$20,200,000
$39,100,000
22
(
(I) Current and Criminal Justice Funds combined -- $14.7 million in 1998 dollars for
CX, $2 million for CJ
(2) Weighted average of property and sales tax proportional contributions - Seattle 34%.
FINANCING PLAN
Regional Services
Based on the information provided above there would be $39.1 million (1998 dollars) in
annual regional revenue available to reallocate as annexation or incorporation occurs or
the county freezes/reduces local service levels in urban unincorporated areas in
anticipation of annexation. Once a picture of the end result has been agreed on then a
phasing plan can be developed.
The suburban cities revised RFG proposal would allocate the annual $39.1 million in the
following ways:
(
1. Nine categories of Human Services shifted to the County from Cities $7,100,000
2. Investments in parks and open space within the urban unincorporated area $9,000,000
3. Phase II RFG Plan $23,000,000 (phase II includes Jails, EmergencylDisaster
Management and Pools)
Transition
During the transition of urban unincorporated areas to cities and the realignment of
county and city service delivery a number of steps will have to be taken to 1) assure
continuous quality of service delivery, 2) assure that unincorporated urban areas new
inftastructure is built to adjacent city standards, 3) assure that the County remains fiscally
sound and can stick to an appropriate FIE to population ratio for unincorporated service,
and 3) facilitate annexation or incorporation of remaining areas of the County with
serious in1Ìastructure deficiencies.
The RFG Plan needs to address each of this items through commitments by the parties to
perform specific actions over the transition period.
Proposed Annexation Area Infrastructure Investment Program
A combination of grant monies fÌ"om the State Public Works Trust Fund ($50 million per
year for ten years); other state funds that can be leveraged and King County Capital
Improvement Program Target investments (Minimum of$50 million per year oflocally
derived dollars for ten years including any accumulated mitigation payments) would be
set aside to address the in1Ìastructure needs often urban unincorporated areas in the
County. The total available dollars would be set aside separately in accounts for each
23
(
annexation/incorporation area. Improvements from the set aside funds would be made on
a schedule determined by the County and the annexing or incorporating city in a formal
written agreement. County monies would be targeted for roads, stormwater/flood
prevention and parks. State money would also be available for water and sewer system
upgrades/improvement.
The total cumulative revenue available for the ten areas combined at the end of the ten
year period would be $500 million (plus any accumulated interest) in County capital
improvement dollars and $500 million from the state Public Works Trost Fund adjusted
for inflation. The County and the Cities would jointly approach the legislature to create
any necessary authorization for the use ofPWTF in this manner. The source ofPWTF
financing is already in place.
The ten areas are as follows:
1. East Federal Way
2. White Center/North HighHne
3. Skyway
4. Sammamish Plateau
5. Kingsgate
6. North Kirkland
7. Renton P AA
8. South Park
9. Lee Hill
10. Rural Cities PAA's
"
Cities may nominate additional areas or remove areas from the list for one year after all
or part of an area is designated as part of its P AA or for one year after the RFG Plan
ratification which ever is longest. Allocation of monies among the ten areas will be
determined based on criteria developed by all of the cities involved. Areas planned for
incorporation will be represented by the County.
BALANCE SHEET FOR SUBURBAN CITIES WITH THE
PROPOSED FINANCING PLAN
A number of cities have asked how this all adds up for the suburban cities as a whole.
The financing plan as described above does not require any new revenue from suburban
cities. (what about courts and animal control?? )
REGIONAL REVENUE I URBAN SUBSIDY
BALANCE SHEET
Net Re 'anal Revenues
Less: Rural Subsid I
Subtotal
Less: Crt of Seattle share (2
Remainder of re 'onal revenue/
$76,000,000
$16,700,000
$59,300,000
$20,200,000
$39,100,000
24
(
urban subsidy available for
reallocation
RFG Plan -- Phase I
Nme cate~ories of human services $7,100,000
Parks Investments $9,000,000
RFG Plan - Phase n
Potential service areas include $23,000,000
Pools, Jail services,
EmergencylDisaster Management
(1) Current and Criminal Justice Funds combined -- $14.7 million in 1998 dollars for
Cx, $2 million for CJ
(2) Weighted average ofproperty and sales tax proportional contributions - Seattle 34%.
P AA transition fund
. Total available: $1 Billion accumulated over ten years in individual accounts
. Allocated among ten urban unincorporated areas of the County
. Improvements are scheduled based on written agreement between the annexing city
and the County
. County would administer adjacent city in..&astructure standards in order to assure that
new development in unincorporated areas has appropriate improvements
¡;!2J.-tr¿f
(j)
06/19/98 Page I of20- SeA Regional GO\ . .,anee and Finance Plan Survey
("
SUBURBAN CITIES QUESTIONNAIRE
ON REGIONAL GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE PLAN
RESPONSES~ARY
30 CITIES (Representing 96 % of population) OF 36 RESPONDING
OVERVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Do you believe your city would ratify the RFG Plan as it is proposed today?
Yes: 1
No: 27
Don't know: 1
If no, what are the key chan2:es that if made, would make it acceptable to your city?
Urban Subsidy
. Dealing with the Urban subsidy (Burien, Redmond and Normandy Park)
. Recognize that first and foremost, the urban subsidy must be quantified and allocated in an
appropriate fashion for regional services.(Bothell)
. Eliminate the need for cities to fund any aspect of the RFG plan from any source other than the urban
subsidy. This should be an urban subsidy reallocation process/negotiation and funding discussion
should be soley contained to that (Clyde Hill)
. Explicitly itemize urban subsidy and plan to pay for any added county to city services with the
subsidy (Des Moines)
. No net added cost to the city. Discussion and resolution ofthe urban subsidy issue (Federal Way)
. Urban Services Element needs to be changed. Recognition of urban subsidy and commitment by KC
to transfer those funds to regional services (Lake Forest Park).
. Address urban subsidy first through compromise ifnecessary.(SeaTac)
. Recognition of the urban subsidy and the rural contribution by the County to our area as well
(Enumclaw)
PAA's
. Firm commitment by the County to fund PAA infrastructure deficits and reduce service levels in
unincorporated urban areas to match revenues generated in those areas (Bellevue)
. Remove PAA's from proposal (Covington)
. Urban unincorporated transition provisions are vague - on the surface it appears that cities are
accepting county responsibility(Lake Forest Park)
. We are concerned about County land use and development activities in our UGA. Need to deal with
this issue ASAP. Rural cities have differing levels of concern about accelerating annexation
schedules. (North Bend)
. Once agreement is made that area will annex, County must commit to deny new development in
PAA unless it conforms to city's level of service standards.(Redmond)
. Equitable sharing of the cost of improving currently deficient infrastructure in PAAs which
acknowledges the County's responsibility to achieve and maintain its own service level standards set
prior to pre-annexation agreements, and to invest revenues collected from P AAs in those P AAs; and
which recognizes that serious unresolved infrastructure and service deficiencies present an
insurmountable barrier to annexation. (Redmond)
. County's agreement to cease allowing and supporting development at densities which put pressure
on adjacent city services and infrastructure.(Redmond)
.'
(
06/19/98 Page 2 of20- SCA Regional G(
l~
ance and Finance Plan Survey
.
Cities should not be required to serve any PAAs prior to annexation. Cities which choose to provide
services to these PAAs may develop their own PAA service agreement with the County.
Termination procedures must be incorporated into any agreements in the event that PAAs refuse to
annex by a date certain.(Renton)
No operational subsidy to PAAs prior to annexation. Cities provide urban services on a full cost
recovery basis while PAA remains unincorporated. If the county refuses to cover the revenue
shortfall, levels of service must be reduced to equalize revenues and expenses.(Renton)
County funds all capital improvements prior to annexation and undertakes the task of identifying
infrastructure deficiencies within the individual P AAs as well of the task of procuring necessary
funds. (Renton)
P AAs should be negotiated by KC and each city, not decided by GMPC or centrally. Address
regional park funding including 0 and M.(SeaTac)
Acknowledge cities in the rural areas in the annexation area proposal. Annexation for
accommodating population target should only occur after at least 50% of buildable land within the
existing city limits has been developed. Annexations should be phased over the 20 year life of the
plan based upon individual plans for each city.(Snoqualmie)
Infrastructure improvements financing/transition fund (Auburn)
Devise collaborative process in PAA decision-making to involve cities and county; agree on cost
sharing for capital investments in PAAs.(Tukwila)
Not a good deal for Cities. The County still has a responsibility (Newcastle)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Human Services
. Continued funding of Human Services at the same level (Algona)
. Remove city financial contribution to regional human services (Bellevue)
. Deal with the funding equity concerns related to human services element (Bothell)
. Remove human services(Covington and Des Moines)
. Human services should be funded out of urban subsidy.(Lake Forest Park and Shoreline)
. Local components of human services like youth and parent services are not possible in small cities
under 5,000 population (Medina).
. Reduce or eliminate "SB5038 transfer" of city revenues (eg MVET) to county. County make up
difference from the urban subsidy(Mercer Island).
. The Human services delivery plan will have to be more specific. Need to know the effect on current,
local service providers. We are concerned about losing MVET monies and still having to fund local
providers at our current amount. (North Bend)
. Revise HS to consider creation of subregional governance that is coordinated regionally with local
representation. Perhaps school district boundaries could define subregional areas (schools would not
do the services).(SeaTac)
. Have the county be more specific about how human services would be delivered to the Cities in the
Rural area. Use local non-profit service providers for delivery of HS. Develop efficiency and
effectiveness benchmarks in order to gauge del ivery of HS by providers. Develop methods to assure
that most dollars are allocated to service areas where money comes from. Could have some money
go to a regional fund that is allocated based upon need, similar to RNA funding for Watersheds.
Have some organization with City participation, such as CDBG consortium, make allocation
decisions.(Snoqualmie ).
. Family Support Health & Human Services should be clåssified as a Regional service. (Shoreline)
. Human Services- Better definition (with community involvement); use urban subsidy and phase-in
with smaller package first (Auburn).
. Better definition of the human services element as it relates to service programs and
access.(Enumclaw)
@)
06/19/98 Page 3 of20- SCA Regional Go,'
1ce and Finance Plan Survey
.
Begin HS regional services by working with 1-2 pilot programs; allow greater funding in areas where
HS are most needed. (Tukwila)
Review of the justification and phasing of the monies (Newcastle)
(
.
Costs
. Clarification of costs, Beaux Arts Village is an area of high real estate values with small population.
Our revenues frequently are based on population numbers. Provision of services, when based on per
capita formula is preferred over real estate valuation formula.(Beaux Arts Village)
. Issue of revenues available to King County and how they are spent; priority(Burien)
. Change at county level must be made within existing revenue.(Normandy Park)
Courts
. Remove courts from package(Bellevue)
. Remove courts of limited jurisdiction. This is a losing proposition for Medina. We cannot share in
County capital costs.(Medina)
. Courts - 50%-50% city-county split of future capital costs for district courts needs attention - some
owner equity? Perhaps shorter contract term (10 years) if capital costs remain the same. (Mercer
Island)
. If cities are responsible for half of this capital, they should have half the decision-making
authority .(Shoreline)
. Concerned about funding District court (funded partly by County general fund $) when we have
muni court. Also concerned about the state funding judges salaries for similar reasons (Milton)
Pools
. Develop regional solution to Forward Thrust Pools. Cities could operate and manage pools in their
jurisdiction but some long-term regional source of funds is needed for capital and operating
expenses. Short of regional solution, additional county funds are needed for capital and operating
transition period. Also, resolution of bond covenants that prohibit closing of pools is needed. County
indemnification of cities? (Mercer Island)
. Drop pools from the proposal altogether.(Bothell, Des Moines and Lake Forest Park)
. County should maintain pools in Cities in the rural area. The County pool in North Bend is primarily
used by County residents (Snoqualmie).
. Refurbish pools to like-new status before turning them over to cities (Tukwila)
. Full capital funding; no operating restrictions (Auburn)
. Negotiation on the pool transfer to address our interest in the adjacent golf course (Enumc1aw)
Zoo
. Remove Zoo from the proposal (Covington)
. Seattle Zoo should not be first in line for allocation of Regional revenues.(Shoreline)
. Remove zoo provision. Seattle should fund this themselves (Milton)
Specialized Police Services
. Should small cities have to pay County for special police services? Why not find a regional funding
source for these services? These services cost North Bend about $100,000 per year or 1/6 of the
police budget. (North Bend).
Misc.
(
ÆJ
06/19198 Page 4 of20- SCA Regional Go
,nee and Finance Plan Survey
.
Greater local flexibility and choice regarding the range of services and funding levels in the area of
human services. Recognition of funding limitations faced by newly incorporated cities. Any
funding formula should be gradually applied to new cities and should reflect the degree of reliance
on sales tax equalization. Clarification on how the County proposes to deliver regional services in
outlying communities such as Maple Valley (Maple Valley)
Mercer Island would likely choose not to ratify the proposal because of the lack of support among
other Suburban Cities. However, the Mercer Island Council, on balance, sees sufficient regional
benefit in the proposal to outweigh the local costs that would be incurred. In that sense, Mercer
Island is supportive ofthe proposal.
(See letter dated May 11, 1998 -- attached) -- The County should allocate Regional revenues for
Regional services only.(Shoreline)
No contribution to county animal control from cities who do not use it (Milton)
State Oregon Medicaid model suggested by CM Dan Shennan has merit (Milton)
Approval process (Normandy Park)
More information about tenns; what is the rural service level?; Lack of trust, How does King County
spend its funds? (Black Diamond)
Would need to further educate, discuss with other contract cities and neighbor cities (Woodinville)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2. From your city's perspective are there key elements of the plan that are missing?
Yes 22
No6
HYes, what would you add?
Costs
. Specific costs (Beaux Arts Village)
. County to provide accurate revenue amounts from each individual P AA together with actual
expenditures to provide existing levels of service. (Renton)
. More real financial data (Milton)
Regional Parks
. Regional funding of regional parks/facilities including the zoo, Colton Park, Highland Center, etc
(Bellevue)
. Full discussion of and agreement on regional parks, ball fields and open spaces (Redmond)
. Regional parks such as North SeaTac Regional Park should be addressed along with the
Zoo.(SeaTac)
Urban Subsidy
. A much clearer way to deal with the "urban subsidy". Allocate the dollars to a set of regional
services in an appropriate fashion. Provide for more city by city flexibility in dealing with
"transition" issues.(Bothell)
. Deal with Urban subsidy and EMS (Covington, Kent)
. Recognize the Urban Subsidy and work towards reducing it. (Federal Way)
. Define how dollars from the urban subsidy will be distributed. Because of high property values in
Hunts Point, the town pays far more than most municipalities through property taxes. (Hunts Point)
. Recogn ¡tion of Urban Subsidy (Lake Forest Park)
. Agreement on the disposition of urban subsidy, on rural service levels, and on rural subsidy levels.
(Redmond)
. Recognition of Urban subsidy -- Commitment by King County for tax fairness (Regional revenues
fund regional services and local revenues fund local services).(Shoreline)
06/19/98 Page 5 ono- SCA Regional Go,
lce and Finance Plan Survey
\W
.
( .
.
.
.
Definition of "rural" level of service to determine "rural subsidy".(Shoreline)
Complete details on the subsidy issues, and reference to address their concerns about human services
and urban subsidy.{Enumclaw)
Urban subsidy and how it will be dealt with (Normandy Park)
Address the Urban subsidy issue (Tukwila)
Financing provisions which include a greater level of County funding of regional services - ie reduce
the urban subsidy (Mercer Island)
Specialized Police
. Clarification of the Police Services component (Maple Valley)
. Interlocal agreement with Pierce County regarding comparable information, management standards
and proticol for computer based regional law enforcement (Milton)
Courts
. Independent performance audit of District Court's business practices to see how it can operate more
efficiently. (Shoreline)
. Courts - KC should also look at reducing District Court costs given annexations and incorporations.
(SeaTac)
PAA
. Commitment to supply services and facilities to county residents at a level which will satisfy their
needs, or pay cities to do so. Or assist those areas to annex so that they contribute to the cost of the
facilities they use.(Redmond)
. Use collaborative process in negotiating PAA's (Tukwila)
Misc.
. Phase II has more important matters directly impacting the lives of our residents than phase I has.
Would like to provide small Police Dept. perspective on specialized police task force study (Clyde Hill).
. Cities need to have a seat at the table when it comes to the delivery of regional services (Kirkland)
. Jails (North Bend and Snoqualmie)
. Better definition of guiding principles (Enumclaw)
. Regional services; Storm water management (Black Diamond)
. Perhaps the attack should be making the County an arm ofthe state and removing cities from being
an arm of the state. That way responsibilities would be clearer. (Newcastle)
3. Lets look at the flip side for a minute. What are the key features in the plan that you
would most like to see stay the way that they are?
. Animal Control -- 21 Cities
. Police Specialty Services -- 11 Cities
. Police Specialized Services, Phase I - I City
. Courts of Limited jurisdiction with some minor revisions - 7 Cities
. Zoo - 3 Cities
. Pools - I City
. The concept of regional finance and governance is important (Kirkland and Newcastle)
. King County taking responsibility for regional human services package. (Mercer Island)
. Sub-regional planning and oversight of human services (but not financing plan!) (Redmond)
. Agreement to standardize police data management and communication technology (Redmond)
. Pools OK as long as the County keeps Si View pool (North Bend)
. Small cities under 5,000 have advantages.
06119/98 Page 6 of 20- SCA Regional Gt
ance and Finance Plan Survey
CQ
(
4. If the "Urban Subsidy" (those sales tax dollars currently collected by the County that
are being used to provide "local" services in the unincorporated urban portion of King
County) were to be re-directed to "regional services", how would your city like to see those
dollars spent? (Please prioritize starting with "1" as the most important to fund, "2" as the
next in importance and so on. You need not prioritize the entire list just those that are most
important to your City.)
SUBURBAN CITIES PRIORITIES FOR USE OF URBAN SUBSIDY
F~~: ~R:ešpõñses~'~i; :;R E G 10 N~' S ERVI GES~~~~~~1~'!?'.~\ó;~~,.'!~J~':!1!"\f.'
.-t:~. '/~~¡~"'.,;.: ':'-,' ' ", " , '; ~;, ..'::; '.:';~::':~r;~Tæ;fj~;;Ç.' :~i~~~{;;:;:~~:~¡l}~~i;,:,~',~:;~;;~~]¡¡f$.1!~r~j¡!~~;,~)l:.:.1
,. ,-,...,. .'...,.. " .'~md Score: ,. '
1 23/8.70 Emergency Medical Services at the end of the current three year levy
2 26/8.15 Region -wide human services with the County matching funding 3 to 1
3 22/7.46 Transition fund to finance infrastructure improvements 10 proposed annexation areas
4 2317.09 Regional parks and open space system acquisition, development and operations
5 13/6.85 District Court and probation costs not covered by fine collections
6 17/6.67 Misdemeanant jail servIces
7 13/5.86 Animal control costs not covered by license IOcome
8 15/5.6 County wide Emergency/Disaster Management
9 1115.05 Transition fund to finance capital and operating costs of King County pools movIng
to City ownership
10 8/1.89 Woodland Park Zoo program (not capital improvement) expansIOn
11 2/8.5 Other -- Reduce taxes; reallocate to small cities
-';,': :~:"'" -:" ::$"'" , " ::"
"J
"',' 'J vi,Llty
,,:,,',
UrbaÌ1;less than
6,000 population (6)
?'Rural;'less than I
'. 6,000 population (3)
?Rural,grea~.èr than
.. 6,000 population (1)
;'NêvvGitÍêšlessthan'
:,",,' , ' ,
5 yearsôld (4)
NewCitÍes more
than 5 years old (4)
Urban, greater than
6,000 population
(12)
':"':':'?, . " "
ALL"CITIES
. "'..' ,.., "
, "1' OF ,FOUR 'üR:ËAÑ.8 VB sîñWPlUÛ roTIEŠ:ïi ~¡'TcAfE GÕ RYtOF;'GriW;fIi:m~i~,¡~~~W~~~'è"~
EMS
Human Annex . R~gioria .JaiL,'Cour ,AI1irifaly,])isâster'C !J?,()9]s'"j
SerVice Transition I Parks Ser"ices' t ë()lit'rê)' ¡ Emcr., ','~"::' ',:';
. ,'" Fund' .', I l\-1gmt. ';":--".:"1
1
..,
J
2
2
4
..,
J
2
2
3
1
4
1
2
3
4
3
2
4
3
2
4
1
3
7
9
6
5
8
2
4
06/19/98 Page 7 of20- SCA Regional GO\'
1ce and Finance Plan Survey
(i)
(
5. If the major components of the service delivery changes in the RFG Plan were going to
be phased in, how would you most like to see them phased? Mark the option you would
most like to see.
, #. OF:' :.,'. .::.~.,..: jÍöW:eltIE'š\Woi:fiÏrMõsí>ï..ïkE'TO'-SEÈ~PDÄN1>HÄŠED~;r.~~~(..
',""""~ ..', ".-.:.' '" .'. ",;;.""""",'-'-.'~'" ~."~."'~~"'...'."'¡;"""".'...'."'. .'.."";"""".."7,"."~.!.' '.'0'0' ,,~.,:"'1.':.i'-'"
~RESPONSES"" .,~~:.~~,~, '~ ~".;-"!,¡,;:...,::;,,,IS~;;¡r,,~.,' -." I
'., ' ,"."'",,',,"~....,.-.~.t:..... .."....,..,..:-SI¡::.~~í," '.",',!':'i5'.¡=tt!¥"!1i1IÌ'jll!'.i"-' . ;~_..'
10 Time would not be a factor, we would set up accountability measures for all sides, when
the accountability standard was met then we would move on to the next phase.
The implementation would be phased over 1- 5 years
Time would not be a factor, the plan would be phased based on perfonnance of certain
components by the County and the Cities - when each side perfonned their list of
required activities we would move on to the next phase of implementation.
The financing plan would be phased over a series of years
The implementation would be phased over 1 - 3 years
I do not see a need to phase in the implementation, we should just pick a start date and
go for it.
The implementation would be phased over 1- 10 years
Other: Sunset element sounds good. Costs of Phase II concern us (Beaux Arts Village)
Depends on the item, no single answer. (Bellevue) It would not matter if the plan just
shifted to urban subsidy (Clyde Hill) The plan would be phased over a period of 10 years
based on perfonnance of certain components by the County and the Cities - when each
side perfonned their list of required activities we would move on to the next phase of
implementation (Renton) First set up accountability measures; different phasing for
various programs ranging from I - 10 years (Tukwila)
8
3
3
3
I
0
5
1. What do you believe are the key issues between the County and the Cities that need to
be addressed in order to reach an agreement related to Potential Annexation Areas?
Up2:rade infrastructure
. Correcting infrastructure deficiencies in P AAs. Requiring the County to implement City
development statndards in P AAs as soon as possible. Establishing a transition process (fund?) that
will encourage unincorporated urban areas to transition to cities in a timeframe and method that is
sustainable by the cities. (Bothell)
. Capital infrastructure improvements or funding (Des Moines)
. County brings P AAs up to County standards and maintains roads. County funds allocated in previous
County TIPs transfer to cities on annexation. (Federal Way)
. County must discontinue its provision of urban levels of service in unincorporated urban areas.
County must make infrastructure improvements. (Kent)
. Inadequate condition of roadway and drainage facilities; lack of local park/recreation facilities. (Lake
Forest Park)
. Condition and plans for correcting infrastructure deficiencies. (Maple Valley).
. Adherence to GMA, and both comprehensive plans. Bring County infrastructure up to standards.
Phasing of annexation (North Bend)
. Infrastructure improvements to city standards (Auburn)
. Cities and county together bring infrastructure in P AAs up to agreed-upon standard before
annexation (Tukwila)
06/19/98 Page 8 ono- SCA Regional G,
ilance and Finance Plan Survey
ø
(
.
Agreement on standards (Black Diamond)
Urban Subsidy
. Key issues are urban subsidy; Cities should not have to take fiscal responsibility for P AAs until they
are annexed. Infrastructure in the PAAs should be brought up to standards before annnexation
(Covington).
. Agreement on urban/rural subsidy(Auburn)
Financinl! of improvements/services in P AA 's
. Financing of infrastructure (Algona and Snoqualmie)
. Burien does not have a PAA. However, the process to deal with the North Highline area is of major
importance to the City. If, then, the City had a P AA, the issues of infrastructure/transition fund
would be significant to the City (Burien).
. Classify PAA's by tiers according to severity of infrastructure and operating deficits - fund
improvement in worst tiers only. No payback upon annexation for infrastructure improvements
(prospective or retroactive).
. The County needs to properly identify dollars spent in unincorporated and rural areas. Have finance
directors review numbers and reach agreement. A recognition that PAA is a financial loser for cities.
Needs to be a financial transition plan for both services and infrastructure. Options could include a
larger share of sales tax or property tax or CIP transition fund during transition period. Proposed
policies for PAA's need to have more reasonable timelines. Concern that policies LU 31.2 requires
significant efforts by cities and special districts prior to annexation.(Kirkland)
. County and cities must agree on fair/equitable sharing of cost to bring infrastructure and services to
appropriate levels for the transition from unincorporated to incorporated status not to bankrupt cities
or degrade their city-wide levels of service. This financial agreement must recognize revenues
collected by the County from P AA residents prior to annexation; the extent to which those revenues
were spent on (or allocated to) the area; and the County's record of delivering services /
infrastructure at appropriate levels prior to annexation.(Redmond)
. No operating subsidy prior to annexation. No capital expenditures by cities prior to annexation
(except at the city's option). No requirement for cities to serve PAAs prior to annexation. There is
no legal mechanism to require annexation within a specific time frame after city starts providing
urban services. ( Renton)
. The residents in P AA' s need to begin paying for the full costs of governmental services.
. Cost sharing on infrastructure improvements between the county, city and expectations upon the
residents(Enumclaw)
. Funding infrastructure improvements (Milton)
. The county needs to continue to improve infrastructure and provide services in PAAs (Newcastle)
Development Re!:!ulation in PAA's
. Ownership status of open space lands. Flexibility in making reasonable changes to the Urban
line(Maple Valley)
. County must agree to stop or slow development within P AAs. If development continues at current
pace, cities will experience greater and greater pressure from P AA residents on the services they are
trying to provide for their own residents. The end result will be diminished service levels within the
cities, and "warfare" at the edges, where residents of unincorporated areas expect urban level
services, can't get it from the county, and believe that they have a right to use the services provided
by and in the cities adjacent to them. During period prior to annexation, County should adopt city
development regulations, and contract with the city to manage development. (Redmond)
. Long-term Planning and Development Services should immediately be assumed by the respective
city to ensure new development complies with city standards.(Shoreline)
(
06119/98 Page 9 of20- SeA Regional Gov
cÐ
Ice and Finance Plan Survey
Misc.
. Mercer Island has no PAA. Consequently, it would not be appropriate to provide specific input on
this item. However, MI believes this issue is of the highest priority to the region and to the suburban
cities and must be addressed to the satisfaction of the cities that have P AAs before a full package can
go forward. (Mercer Island)
. Outside the P AA boundary, County must commit to maintaining services at a rural level which is
substantially below the urban level provided by the cities. If agreement is not reached on this point,
we will continually have this problem.(Redmond)
. Do not force cities to take PAA's. Require mutual City/County agreements instead. (SeaTac)
. Annexations should be "citizen driven" (Auburn)
. Define smaller "discrete" in relation to annexations under LU 33. 1 (Milton)
. Create a collaborative process among potentially annexing cities, with King County as
moderator.(Tukwila)
. Allow a 3 year process for negotiations on P AAs. If no agreement after 3 years, refer decision to
GMPC. (Tukwila)
. Does not apply the city has very little PAA (Woodinville)
"
2. Are you generally comfortable with the Potential Annexation Areas section of the plan
as it stands now?
Yes 1
N022
If no, what key change(s) would make it more acceptable?
.
Refinement on process for areas of "dispute"(Burien).
Transition fund mechanism and details (Burien)
Define county obligation to PAA's - process, money set aside, time line. Leave room for individual
P AA negotiations. Match service levels in unincorporated area to unincorporated revenue. Define
rural service levels; Joint advocacy on state annexation law reform (Bellevue).
Too costly for cities (Des Moines)
Provide greater details as to agreement expectations. King County approve P AA agreements that
local agencies have approved (Federal Way)
County should bring infrastructure up to standards. They have been collecting road tax and drainage
fees from these areas for years. Service transitions should be spelled out. (Kent)
Our PAA is so small that this does not really apply to LFP (Lake Forest Park)
Recognize the infrastructure deficiencies involved in newly incorporated cities which in essence are
100% P AA.(North Bend)
Rural cities with extensive UGAs can not be forced to accept annexation until they are prepared for
them (North bend)
CPPs need to recognize the Bear Creek UPD as a future, stand-alone city. This "unclaimed" area
should remain unclaimed by any existing city! Additionally, wording and map changes need to be
made to state with certainty that a city cannot annex a non-contiguous area by "piercing" through a
rural area. .
Wording changes are needed to clarify when an interlocal (pre-annexation) agreement is needed, and
when it is not necessary. Cities should not be required to negotiate a PAA agreement if there are no
material concerns or issues with the County.
Wording needs to be retained which allows for PAAs to incorporate rather than annex, ifthat is
desired by the residents of the P AA, and is the best overall outcome for the parties concerned.
(Redmond)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
c.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
06/19/98 Page 10 of20- SCA Regional ú".ernance and Finance Plan Survey
@
County agrees to upgrade infrastructure to county standards or establish a fund for the cities to do so.
County provides accurate total revenue data and accurate total expenditure data for each individual
PAA.
Realign PAA boundary and responsibility on West Hill (Skyway) to recognize that certain portions
of this PAA identify with Seattle or Tukwila. (Renton)
Local services within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAA's) need to be funded only by local
revenues -- the gap in either revenues or inadequate service levels must be funded by the P AA
Funding for PAA's (infrastructure) should not come at the expense of other RG&F
priorities.(Shoreline)
Better define how infrastructure would be funded (Milton)
Define the rural subsidy and the expected level of service (EnumcIaw)
Define the appropriate level of infrastructure need in the P AA, and the relative share from the
County (Enumclaw)
City should not pay to bring infrastructure up to County standards (Auburn)
Need infrastructure policy/plan and interlocal agreements before annexation (Auburn)
Allow timing to be more "citizen driven" (Auburn)
Delete the GMPC role in providing a map of P AAs (Tukwila)
Include cities, county in negotiation for PAAs (Tukwila)
Involve King County as moderator for disagreeing cities (Tukwila)
County should continue to service the area and infrastructure of the PM (Newcastle)
Include close urban area in city P AA (Black Diamond)
3. Does your city have a Potential Annexation Area?
Yes: 20
No: 8
Will have a PAA when GMA plan done: 2 (Maple Valley and Covington)
Burien does not currently have a P AA, however a large area to the north White Center/ North Highline
is in dispute.
Woodinville's PAA is very small.
If yes, please answer the following questions:
a. Is there a dispute about part or all of the your P AA boundary?
Yes: 4_Renton, Burien, Tukwila and Lake Forest Park
No: .l2.
Redmond is assuming that the Bear Creek UPD and the Sammamish Plateau incorporate rather than
annex.
Auburn has a P AA dispute in Pierce County
b. What other jurisdiction(s) would potentially have the disputed area(s) in their PAA?
Tukwila and Seattle (Renton) Shoreline (LFP) Election this Sept will decide remaining area (Shoreline);
Seattle and? (Burien); Seattle and SeaTac (Tukwila
c. What is/are the area's common name (if it has one) and how large is the disputed
area(s) in acres or square miles?
Renton - Skyway or Westhill ( 3.18 square miles); LFP-- Annexation area A; White Center or North
Highline (Burien); South Park; Tukwila Valley South (Tukwila)
d. "Vhat is the approximate population of your P AA?
06/19/98 Page II of20- SCA Regional Go' .
nce and Finance Plan Survey
~)
(
15; 7,000;3,200;300;25,000;34,000;1,000; Bear Creek UPD 11,000 to 20,000 with 7,000 jobs;
40,000;250; 1 ,500; 20,000; 10,000; 550;50;60
e. How much of the population is in the disputed area(s)?
2,000 Kirkland; Renton 13,000; Lake Forest Park 1,000/1,500 for the same area reported by Shoreline; 20,000
(Burien); 50 (Tukwila);
f. Have you any written information describing your P AA and/or the
infrasturcture/service delivery issues in your PAA?
Yes: Kent; Kirkland; Sammamish Plateau Incorporation Study; Renton; Lake Forest Park and
Shoreline; Milton; Tukwila; Black Diamond and Auburn
No: 9
g. Have you started negotiations with the County on a transition agreement for all or part
of your P AA?
Yes: Kent; Auburn; Tukwila; Black Diamond
No: 13
h. Do you have a written preliminary draft agreement?
Yes: Kent; Black Diamond
No: 15
i. If you could control the rate of annexation for your P AA how long would it take to annex
your entire P AA to the City? Please mark the answer that best applies to you.
We would annex it all right now: 5 Cities
1-3 years: I City
3-5 years: 4 Cities
5-10 years: 3 Cities
Other: We would prefer all at once with a transition agreement (Kirkland) If Sammamish Plateau
does not incorporate Redmond would need to consider impacts (Redmond) 10 - 20 years
(Snoqualmie)
Residents will not approve annexation for two reasons -- the city require debt assumption and the
city opposes creation of a new community council with land use veto authority (Bellevue regarding
Eastgate);Depends on resources 10-20 years(Enumclaw and Black Diamond); Wait until property
owners ask for annexation (Tukwila)
~
~
06/19/98 Page 12 of 20- SCA Regional G~ _mance and Finance Plan Survey
(
j. Please prioritize the infrastructure needs in your P AA from 1 (needing the most
improvement) to 10 (needing no improvements). You may use "10" more than once.
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
I3
14
øI{,~,..,'Bg~$~""""""';;^iC~¿ ',l',.,<,.,:..;Fg.,~.:",~,,~,. ,...Q'f""~'~."",,,
'AND'SCORES"',,"",'.","".' .," "",""'::'~""""'!~"'"'::5::~,,,"""'~'~',':',::"','""",--.,
,.. , ..~ "" """"""" "":~""."'-~~",~'t".:è'1~'..."~H~.;",,:,,:,~,.,¿;t<.:..j
17/7.71 Street surface and/or lane improvements
15/6,93 Stonn water system
16/6.69 Sidewalks or other pedestrian improvements
15/5,87 Flood prevention system
16/5.8 I Sanitary sewer system
14/5.71 Additional park acreage
15/5.60 Intersection and traffic safety improvements
11/4.82 Stream or lake restoration
13/4,62 Water system
10/4.60 Development of existing park acreage
I I/4,O Recreation buildings and facilities
14/3,86 Street light system
10/3. I Redevelopment or major maintenance of existing
developed parks
Fire stations
Other - Support facilities for municipal services in new
area (Kirkland) Ready to annex Eastgate "as is" but does
not want to pay back improvement costs in the area to
county improvements (BeIIevue)
9/2,89
2
T () ÞTI;' (j úR~ R. oPpS ED .. A~ xX- i'(ÕN':.\RE A:. C AP ITAL 'l1\!P B Q-yË -~ m ~~Ï) $mX7~~~~
TYPE ,,'
Category of
City
.,
Urban, less than
6,000populatiôJ¡
(2)
..Rural, less than
6,000 population
(2)
Rurahgr~atêr" .
than6,'MO,i
populatìön(i) . ' .
New Cities less
than 5 years old
(3)
New Cities more
than 5 years old
(2) .,.
Urban;gr~~tTg'<'",
than6;OOO",,:,,'
population (10)
ALL CITIES
(20)
Street
Surface
Intersection
Improvcment
Water Sewer Park""":
System' System "Acquisition
Pedestrian
Improvements
Stoml
water
System
3
2
~
.J
1
2
Flood
Prevo
2
I
1
3
2
I
2
2
Flood
Prevo
3
3
I
3
2
(
06/19/98 Page 13 of20- SCA Regional GO\ . nee and Finance Plan Survey
@
POOLS
1. Do you have a county or city pool in your City?
Yes: 11
No: lQ
If yes, please answer the following questions:
a. Who owns the pool in your community? Please mark the those that apply.
.
City pool that was never owned by the County: I City-- Kirkland
City pool that was transferred from the County: 2 Cities-Shoreline and Bellevue
County pool that has not been transferred to the City yet: 9 Cities - Redmond, Mercer Island, Kent,
Federal Way, Des Moines, Bothell, Enumclaw, Auburn, Tukwila
County pool that is not proposed for transfer: 1 City -- North Bend
County Pool in P AA: 1 City -- Renton
Redmond's county pool is on city property not school district property.
.
.
.
.
.
b. If the City operates the pool, how much does your pool make a year in revenue above
expenses?
If your pool costs more to run than is collected in revenue, what is the annual subsidy?
$100 - 150,000 per year (Bellevue) 90,000 to 120,000 per year King Co. Northshore pool (Bothell)
$50,000 per year (Kirkland); City will subsidize about 50% after 4 years of transition from the
County. City subsidizes 22% now after one year county subsidizes 33% (Shoreline)
c. If you have a County pool in your city and it has not been transferred to you yet, please
answer the following questions:
i. Does your city want to take over the County pool?
Yes: 0 Cities
No: 10 Cities
ii. Are you generally comfortable with the terms and process for transferring the County
pool to you as described in the draft RFG plan?
Yes: 1
No: 8
If no, what would make the transfer more acceptable?
.
Does not want the pool under any circumstances (Bothell and Kent)
Make it optional on the part of the city (Des Moines)
Transfer land title to the City. Upgrade or redevelop the pool to meet today's needs and programs. If
regionally used then regional contribution to cost (Federal Way)
The transition period is short, the funds provided are small and the condition/design of the pools are
dated and not contemporary to the demands of the public. Also, the city's legal staff believes that
the Forward Thrust bond covenants prohibit closing a pool (without replacing it with a forward thrust
eligible facility) for 40 years. Hence, the proposal's language concerning three year transition with
the local option to close is not real. There appears to be real (unacceptable) political and legal
consequences to pool closures. Have the transfer be part of a regional solution that gauges current
.
.
.
06/19/98 Page 14 of20- SCA Regional L "mance and Finance Plan Survey
@
.
and future aquatics service needs and directly addresses them. Explore opportunities for new
designs, new marketing, new governance and new financing. (Mercer Island)
Redmond is willing to commit time and energy to develop a long-range aquatics plan for king
county. Without such a plan to provide context for the discussion about pool ownership, we cannot
consider the current proposal (Redmond)
Longer term financial analysis on the pool; capital improvement (Enumclaw)
Control of the fee structure at the pool (Enumclaw)
Need more capital funding from the County and continued maintenance cost sharing. No restrictions
on City operation of pool (Auburn)
Improve the pool to make sure no capital improvements are needed for 8-10 years after takeover
(Tukwila)
Clarify legal requirements for keeping pools open and for city-county responsibilities
(
.
.
.
.
.
iii. If you do not want the county pool transferred to you under any terms, would it be all
right for the county to eventually close the pool?
Yes: 3
No: 5
Would need further discussion among the county and school district, plus community
input.(Auburn)
(
If no, what would you propose happen with the pool?
. Based on significant public input, the city would not support the county choosing to close the pool.
Therefore, the city supports the pool continuing to be available to the regions residents and being run
by the County. (Bothell)
. A vocal and effective group of local citizens would object to a closure of the pool if no other
alternative is offered. A successful legal challenge would be quite possible. Under those
circumstances, it is unlikely the City would support closure (Mercer Island)
. Pools need to ultimately be replaced by modern aquatics facilities located throughout the county.
(Redmond)
NINE CATEGORIES OF REGIONAL HUMAN SERVICES
1. Are you generally comfortable with this section of the plan?
Yes: 2
No: 25
Unsure: 2
If no, would you be comfortable with this part of the plan if the following changes were made?
(please indicate the most important change to your city as "I", the next as "2" and so on. Please
rank only those important to your city):
~~h ;?~;RËspõNSEŠ;;~ ~~<?~Q.~~J~~~S:fO¡'í!~fI;ffi..~~~.~V~~~J§!!:,Çì~O~
i!:....,; '.,' . "AND SCORE .' 'PJ.'AN'~!;;";.t\~""" ':;'~""",:'~'~';"" ,:;...~^;.t:..;..(..~,(-!,..~,~.~~.~"~~::1'i¡:);;>"-..i!l'?~~. .
:° . . . , J..J ,_.,...,.. "'" "'""""'" ~_.."~~,~..."...~~..
1 23/1.19 The City did not have to transfer any funding or funding source to the
County? Instead we would allocate part of the "urban subsidy"
County contributions to human services would offset any city
contributions as annexation occurs to encourage annexation of revenue
negative neighborhoods.
2
11/2.5
06/19/98 Page 15 of20- SCA Regional Gt . anee and Finance Plan Survey
4Ð
(
3
6/2.67
The cost and provision of services in Cities under 6,000 population would
be the direct responsibility of the County under certain conditions.
Cities who direct a larger than average amount of funding to Human
Services would have the option to opt out of the County service agreement
and be fully responsible for the human services in their community.
4
912.72
2. If you are not comfortable with this part of the plan, what key change(s) would make it
more acceptable?
. Eliminate city funding of regional human services transferred to the County (Bellevue, Des Moines).
. IfHS is seen truly as a regional service, then, according to the adopted SCA principles, they should
be funded from regional revenues. This should be either through current County wide funding
sources or a new revenue source or a combination of the two. Previous city Human Services
funding should be allocated to local human service needs determined by local officials(Bothell).
. Eliminate the need for cities to fund this part of the plan, use the urban subsidy (Clyde Hill).
. No transfer of funds or services from city to county, local needs determined by city and
accountability system needs to be completed (Covington).
. Do any regionalization one step or service category at a time with measures of service level annually
and cost controls (Federal Way).
. The regional vs. local service designation does not work. County should either take it all and pay for
it from existing revenue or leave it to cities (Kent).
. Current Level of service must be at least maintained; Need greater involvement of HS providers in
transition (Kirkland)
. Because it is a department of the City and a direct service provider, the City seeks some assurance
that MI Youth and Family services will be the human services provider for MI. (Mercer Island).
. Financing from the "urban subsidy" or some other regional source which would not have the effect
of increasing the cities contribution to financing regional services (which must be funded fully by the
County) (Redmond).
. Use the urban subsidy to fund this. Even the most conservative estimate places this subsidy at 9.7
Million (Gardiner page 10). Under the proposed plan the county formula for assessing hs revenue is
5.6 million dollars. Thus the subsidy will fund hs with 4.1 million left over for other regional
services. If the Gardiner Report's higher estimate ($31 million) is used in this equation, the amount
left over is 25.4 million dollars (Renton).
. One idea is to consider subregional level of governance coordinated regionally but with local level
representation.(SeaT ac).
. Have the County be more specific about how human services would be delivered to the Cities in the
rural area. Use local non-profit service providers for delivery of human services. Develop efficiency
and effectiveness benchmarks in order to gauge delivery of human services by providers. Develop
methods to assure that most dollars are allocated to service areas where money comes from. Could
have some money go to a regional fund that is allocated based upon need, similar to RNA funding
for watersheds. Have some organization with city participation, such as CDBG consortium, make
allocation decisions (Snoqualmie).
. Financing by King County and taking full responsibility for the listed "regional services". (Burien)
. Local direction on service priorities in our community ({...ake Forest Park).
. County simply assumes responsibility for Health & Human Services.
. Family Support Services need to be a Regional service program -- it cannot be separated from the
balance of related Regional services.(Shoreline)
. Better definition of the services and access(EnumcIaw)
. Identify "regional" and "local" more clearly; assign more to regional; phase in implementation;
include sunset clause; no city funds transferred (Auburn)
.
( .
.
.
.
06/19/98 Page 16 of20- SCA Regional (
(~
nance and Finance Plan Survey
Not reducing city's level of service for HS (Tukwila)
Focusing HS funds to areas of greatest need (eg South King County) Tukwila
Ensure services are accessible f or city residents (Tukwila)
The county should provide a full range of HS county wide and if cities wish to fund other human
services and a higher service level they will pay.( Nonnandy Park)
Phasing in a must and use of the urban subsidy(Newcastle)
3. Does your city fund human services in any of the nine categories of regional service
being proposed for transfer to the county (family support and child development, youth,
information and referral, basic needs/survival services, domestic violence, sexual assault
services, community health clinics, employment, senior programs)?
Yes: 24
No: 5
4. If you do not fund human services now, do you feel that your citizens have a need for the
services?
Yes: 4
No: I
5. If you do not fund human services now do you have a plan to fund human services in the
next 1 - 3 years?
Yes: I
No:4
6, If you do fund human services and responsibility was transferred to the County for the
nine categories of regional service as proposed, do you want the option to continue to
augment the regional programs with local funding?
Yes: 18
No: 6
. The City Council supports bright line in funding of human services between cities and county.
While Bellevue would not choose to fund regional human services once that obligation has been
transferred to the county, other cities may choose to do so and could not be prohibited from this
(Bellevue ).
. However, if the City chooses to fund these programs defined as regional within its own city limits
then, obviously, it may do so (Renton).
. We feel it will happen despite transfer to regional level (SeaTac).
.
If yes, why is it important to you to retain the option to augment regional funding?
Don't know how the County will operate. Will they meet our community's expectations and needs?
(Clyde Hill)
To meet local gaps in regional funding (Des Moines)
Some locally important services my not be funded by the County (Federal Way).
We do not have confidence that the county will respond adequately to local needs (Kent).
Ability to respond to local priorities and needs (Maple Valley)
MI has a long history of providing very high levels of HS to its community. HS are considered as
part of the City's fundamental mission. The nine basic "regional" services are considered the bare
minimum for hs programs for MI. The City will continue to exceed that level of service provision
regardless of the County's role in regional HS (Mercer Island).
Residents like to see some of their tax dollars used locally (North Bend)
.
.
.
.
.
.
(
06/19/98 Page 17 of 20- SCA Regional Gc.
Q:Y
mce and Finance Plan Survey
.
Augmentation of regional funding should be an option for the city, but should be designed in a way
that does not allow agencies to come directly to cities for "enhancement" funding. If a city chooses
to enhance the service level of a regional system in its own jurisdiction, the city's enhancement funds
should go directly to the sub-regional account for the service identified by the city. This would
prevent dual contracts (one with the county and one with the city) for a regional service. It would
allow cities to offer more than a baseline service level where waTTanted, and if desired (Redmond)
Always would like to retain this option (Lake Forest Park).
Address unique and special needs of the city's demographics (Shoreline)
To ensure that we provide services that meet the needs (Milton)
Want to maintain relationship with providers; confusion between local and regional financing could
create confusion for providers and possibly service disruption (Auburn)
Local control of priorities as a community (Enumclaw)
Tukwila has greater HS needs than many other cities, and we feel it is necessary to address those
needs (Tukwila).
Different cities may have differing HS needs that should be paid for by the cities.(Normandy Park)
While regional funding and service delivery would address regional standards there may be instances
where local standards exceed the county funded standard.(Woodinville)
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
If yes, Which of the nine categories would you most likely fund?
Eastside Domestic violence and Eastside sexual assault for Children (Clyde Hill)
Domestic violence and seniors (Des Moines)
Youth services (Maple Valley)
To varying extents, all nine of the categories would be supplemented with local funds. Family
support and child development, youth counseling, resource and refeTTal, and employment services
would receive the largest shares of funding (Mercer Island).
Children's services, youth programs, seniors and food bank (North Bend).
Family support and Child Development and Youth services (Redmond)
Youth development and substance abuse prevention (Shoreline)
Youth (Auburn)
Senior Programs (Enumclaw and Milton)
Almost all (Tukwila)
DV and senior programs (Woodinville)
Family support, senior programs and child development (Newcastle)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
"
06/19/98 Page 18 of20- SCA Regionall
mance and Finance Plan Survey
@
(
7. If human services are transferred to the County, are there accountability measures or
types of city or community involvement that would make you more confident in the quality,
quantity and effectiveness of the services being delivered through the County in your
community? (Please indicate which of the following list would be the most important to
you - rank only those that are important with number "I" being the most important, "2"
the next important and so on.)
'?RÃÑK;':'¡;~ ":~ESPO N~rE§"":"'~ --II liMA ~rSERVì cts'Äcêo UNT ;\B IL ITY.'~tE;\:SUR Es:.l~:':~~':~:::" .~;~ ::~7~.;;j
:~,"" AND SCORE ,. ',"," ,'~:, <t, ':".>:~",:'~~;.::~~:~~~.:,:.-:,:",;
1 911.67 Monitor County perfonnance or be involved in the human services
funding/planning process for a set amount of time, if the County is
doing alright then drop City participation and monitoring.
City involvement in service delivery planning, priority setting and
funding after transfer
If the County assumes the responsibility for the proposed nine categories
of human services I do not believe the City should have any further
involvement.
Other: Local review of plan before implementation (Kirkland);Use
already established community networks to recommend funding, take
local input and monitor County (North Bend); Full city
participation/active partnership of cities and county in subregional
council (will require intensive involvement and participation from the
cities (Redmond); On-going assessment/study of needs; more public
involvement; more savings on administration (Auburn); Need to make a
benchmark for minimum services and if a City wants to augment then
they have the ability (Newcastle)
Periodic audits of level of effort in funding services in my community
after responsibility is transferred to the County
Periodic performance audits of County service delivery effectiveness
Periodic reporting on human service funding priorities and service
delivery results for my community by the County to the City Council
Audit of County and City level of effort in funding services in my
community before transfer occurs
Establish a sunset date for County perfonnance in the human services
area - services and transferred funds would revert back to the Cities if
the County does not perfonn.
Local option to continue to fund human services
Establishment of a County overhead rate which could not be exceeded
Monitor County perfonnance or be involved in the human services
funding and planning process for a set amount of time, if the County is
doing alright then drop city participation and monitoring.
2
12/2.75
3
6/2.5
4
5/2.4
5
17/3.46
6
7
17/3.25
23/3.48
8
11/3.82
9
11/3,64
10
11
12
11/4.27
12/4.08
1/3
06/19/98 Page 19 of20- SCA Regional Go~, .d/1ce and Finance Plan Survey
00
-~
(
POLICE SPECIAL TV SERVICES. ANIMAL CONTROL. COURTS OF
LIMITED JURISDICTION AND ZOO
1. Are you generally comfortable with these sections of the plan?
Police specialty services
Yes:24 (One city said "but funded by County")
No: 4
Animal control
Yes: 25
No: 2
Courts of Limited JurisdictionlDistrict Court Services
Yes: 15
No: II
Zoo
Yes: 14
No: 13
2. If you are not comfortable with these parts of the plan, what key change would make it
more acceptable?
POLICE
. Working well, no substantial changes are desired, we wish not to be surprised at undue unforeseen
costs. (Beaux Arts Village)
. Don't see a plan yet, just an 18 month study. (Clyde Hill)
. Not in favor of phase II services being regional (Federal Way)
. More specifics on police services. (Maple VaHey)
. Sharing information is only the beginning. We need a regional funding source to allow the Sheriffs
Dept. to handle specialty services: air support, bomb disposal, K-9, MARR, Drug Task Force,
Communications, etc,CNorth Bend)
. Cities less than 5,000 population should not have to pay for police specialty services, except air
support. (Snoqualmie)
"
ANIMAL CONTROL
. Working well. Don't change it. One time per capita is fine. (Beaux Arts Village)
. It is unclear if the County is responsible for their apparent shortfaH (Shoreline)
. Animal control should not be subsidized by cities that do not use it.(Milton)
COURTS
. Remove from package. Also final agreements with county may not conform to court commission
recommendations. (Bellevue)
. In terms of courts, would support seeking legislative change to allow contracting with other cities for
municipal court services.(Bothell)
. We are a net $ loser without any better service. The capital costs provision is off the wall. (Clyde
Hill)
. Option should be available for city to city contracting (Covington)
. Concerned about the additional city costs (Federal Way)
. The County has performed extremely poorly in managing its expenses and facilities in this area. We
have great concern about turning over city revenues and participating in capital costs (Medina)
(
06/19/98 Page 20 of20- SCA Regional G
(jjJj
V
. nance and Finance Plan Survey
.
The 50/50 share of future capital expenses is a problem. Who owns the court facilities after
construction? Shared equity? (Mercer Island)
Courts should be a regional service. Cities should not need to negotiate for this service, but we
should be able to depend on the County to deliver excellent service at convenient locations, with
customer-friendly processes, and minimal financial impact on associated city services such as police
and prosecution. It remains to be seen whether cities can negotiate acceptable agreements with King
County under the "ground rules" and assumptions resulting from the Court Commission's work. We
anticipate that the most troublesome components will be cities capital investments in new
courthouses still owned by the county, the ten year term of the agreement, the cost (or proportion of
revenue the County will retain), and our confidence that the County can/will provide consistently
high quality service.(Redmond)
Do not eliminate municipal courts, reduce district court costs to reflect reduced workload and
eliminate subsidy to cities (SeaTac).
If the city is going to be responsible for 50% of the capital, we need 50% of the say (Shoreline)
Courts should not be subsidized by Cities that do not use it (Milton)
Need accountability for expenditures (Black Diamond)
.
.
.
.
.
zoo
. We need to know cost to our city. (Beaux Arts Village)
. Only accommodate Seattle's urban subsidy (Federal Way)
. Seattle's baby! (Covington)
. We just don not see that the zoo belongs in this discussion. It is trival when compared to P AA' sand
Human Services. Is that the best Seattle could do? (Kent)
. It's probably OK if Seattle needs something to make this work. Ifwe don't care about
accommodating Seattle, then 2 million dollars a year is a lot of the subsidy to allocate to
animals...how about back to people who need human services? (Clyde Hill)
. Eliminate the zoo subsidy. It is either regional or it is not.(Renton)
. Addressed along with regional parks.(SeaTac)
. All regional facilities should have opportunity to access regional dollars. Also, need more
clarification on Seattle's application of County's Zoo dollars. (Bellevue)
. Strong concern that money should go to Seattle for zoo funding (Burien)
. The zoo should not be first in line for Regional revenues. (Shoreline)
. Zoo should not be subsidized by cities that do not use it (Milton)
. Some question about why such a large amount (Auburn)
. Need accountability for expenditures (Black Diamond)
MEETING DATE: July 7, 1998
ITEM#Jl7ïT
......................................................,......................................""'."""""""'."""""""'.""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..............................,.........................
.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
City Council
AGENDA ITEM
...§y~.~ç.!.;...~ ~.~ .~.~.~. ..~. ~f~!Y. ..9.. !".~~~~.~.~~.... .........-................................,.......... .........................", ...............".. ............ ..",......
CATEGORY: BUDGET IMPACT:
- CONSENT
X ORDINANCE
_BUSINESS
HEARING
FYI
RESOLUTION
STAFF REPORT
_PROCLAMATION
_STUDY SESSION
OTHER
Amount Budgeted:
Expenditure Amt:
Contingency Reqd:
...........................................................................................,...""""""""".""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"...................................................,......
.
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance
.......................................................,..............................................................................................................................",...............
....................................,.......
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND:
This is a housekeeping item which amends Ordinance 95-252 creating the Public Safety Department so that the
appointments and the reporting structure of Deputy Directors are consistent with other City departments,
...................,................................................................................................................................................,..................................
...................,.........................
CITY COUNOL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to amend Ordinance 95-252 creating the Public Safety Department and forwarding to full Council for
approval.
........................................................"......................................................................,.......................................................................
.....,................."<""""~""""
OTY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: ~W( û......../~ Y1~t"::;¡i\"'~~~'" I~ ~~ C~~d""';'
.......i;:".....~~....~~~...~..:................................................................................................,...............................~...1..!~.......
APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNOL PACKET:
(BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE)
COUNOL ACTION:
_APPROVED
_DENIED
_TABLEDIDEFERREDINO ACfION
COUNOL BILL #
1st Reading
Enactment Reading
ORDINANCE #
RESOLUTION #
197
.
Item SF
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS, RECREATION, PUBLIC SAFETY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
Date:
June 22, 1998
From:
Ron Wood, Director
Department of Public Safety
Subject:
Public Safety Department Ordinance
Background:
This is a housekeeping item which amends Ordinance 95-252 creating the Public Safety Department
so that the appointments and the reporting structure of Deputy Directors are consistent with other
City departments.
Committee Recommendation:
Motion to amend Ordinance 95-252 creating the Public Safety Department and forwarding to full
Council for approval.
APPROV AL OF COMMITTEE REPORT:
~:'m;;; /
c
DRAFT
1c!~c¡17j:-
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS REGARDING
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT.
(AMENDING ORDINANCE 95-252)
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 95-252 the Federal Way City Council
established a City Department known as the Federal Way Public Safety Department
("Department") and created the positions of Director of the Department ("Director") and
one or more Deputy Directors ("Deputy Director") who report directly to the City
Manager; and
WHEREAS, when the Department was created, a Director for the
Department had not been appointed and the scope of the Director's duties were not
fully defined; and
WHEREAS, the reporting structure and future appointments of Deputy
Director(s) should be consistent with all other City departments wherein the Deputy
Director(s) shall be appointed by and report directly to the Director;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendment. Ordinance 95-252 shall be amended as follows:
A.
Appointment of Deputy Director(s) of Public Safety. Section 4 of ordinance
92-252 shall be amended as follows:
Section 4. One or more Deputy Directors of the Department ("Deputy Director") shall
be appointed by the Director. The Deputy Director(s) shall perform such duties as
required by, and be directly accountable to, the Director. The position(s) of Deputy
Director shall be exempt from the civil service system.
B.
Administrative Authority. Section 5 of ordinance No. 92-252 shall be amended
as follows:
Section 5. The Director shall be in direct charge of the Department and shall be
responsible for all aspects of Department operations and police services delivery. The
Director shall perform such duties as required by, and be directly accountable to, the
City Manager.
Section 9. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and
severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or
portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or
circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the
validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 10. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective
date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 11. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty
(30) days from the time of its final passage, as provided by law.
day of
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this
,1998.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
MAYOR, RONALD L. GINTZ
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, N. CHRISTINE GREEN, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY, LONDI K. LINDELL
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.