The URL can be used to link to this page

9a - Joint Use Maint Facility Site SelectionJoint Use Maintenan%0%., . %A%0111%. r Site Selection Public Works Department Parks Department 6/21/2022 1 Policy Question Should council select the preferred site for the new Joint Use Operations and Maintenance Facility and authorize $250,000.00 in expenditures from unallocated capital improvement funds to advanced preliminary design? Project Need — Size and Function Inefficient Multiple Existing Locations Park Ranger Station t O&M Fatik' s and storage 4ti 9TMEAI P +1.CA VA PGWL-li;.VoLl L ilden T I Lakeland t'. °� Nort17 S l La 'Park Federa; WayOLF— � L_ Pacifty bonsai MOse6m West HyFebos Wetlands Park Y�i[d Waves Theme t and WJ rer Perk �AA� t!":JU..11 Pe L'IJYL'L' mi GO: ale P rn -1 F =• 5 Project Need - Security • In the past 3 years: —17 break-ins — Over $250,000 equipment lost /damaged — Estimated over 600 crew hours lost due to break- ins. Project Need — Asset Protection • Materials and equipment left uncovered / unprotected. — Theft and Vandalism. • Catalytic converters; batteries; fuel; etc. — Maintenance issues. • Hydraulic systems — freeze damage; sun damage (e.g. cracked hoses). • Rain — water getting where it is not supposed to be (e.g. fuel tanks, filters) — Reduction of lifespan estimated at 5% to 35% (higher reduction for smaller equipment not designed to be outside when not in use). Background Information • May 2021—Briefed council on programming results. • Confirmed criteria for site selection. • May 2021 — February 2022: — Finalized site evaluation report. — Completed due diligence on potential property acquisition. • May 2022 —Update on final site selection report and outline next steps. • June 2022 —Select preferred site. Current & Future Staff Count STAFFING TABLE 0112M 1 Des0 Lion Current Future Streets FTE 10 15 Streets - Seasonal 6 6 Traffic - FTE .01 4 SVVM - FTE I 10 SWM - Seasonal 6 5 SWM - Inspection— 3 4 Parks - FTE 16 32 Parks - Seasonal 21 30 Fleet - FTE 1 Operations Manager' 0 1 Admin Assistant": 0 1 Construction Ins ectors" 5 6 TOTALS 75 118 Programming Current Vehicles and Equipment List Mane Monr06 Monroe Pelee it Pmgm&IL PaUemit Scbr Tgdi Stier Teal Sobr Tgdi Sorer Tacit SWr Tcr* rl Sd�r Tacit oranaon 31cr1ng Mark Swenaan $Wnnwn Spr+ Swef*on spro Tenon Ti{1er Marren Ford SP1*8der I 213M PW ST. SL 2 N4 WA V-Hopper Sander 2013 PVP 5T- SL 2 NO WA V-Hopper Sender UO 5Yd Dump 9d4 SYd Lump 36r id YD Dump M82-!L,R-1548 2015 PW ST- SL 2 NG WA 20GB Pyp ST- SL 2 NO A6274D 2009 PW ST- M 2 NO @75WE 2006 PVP ST- SL 2 NO A510D 2015 FW $T- 5L 2 NG 589W5 MB2-0W 548 2015 PW 87 - SL 2 NO 539640 'd924L1?o1 W 20115 PW ST- SL 2 NO 589mo M62-0,1648 2016 PW ST- 9L 2 NO 58W65 M@21R-1 }I$ 201$ PVd ST -% 2 NO .59741ID M62-LR-1548 2015 PW ST- SL 2 NO 507820 boat A11950ppvn11; EX-10D-ld-54 SS 1994 PW ST- 9L 2 NO 15920o 200.1 PUJ .ST -SL 2 No 125541D 1993 PW ST- 9L 2 NO WA Sgirbcw 2M PUJ ST•51. 2 NO WA Steel 26172 PW ST- 5L 2 N4 I" TC-12"-42 2002 PYv ST- SL 2 NO WA Bengal Brute 2RW PW ST- SL 2 NO WA CPS195K04T4 20% PVv ST- SL 58"b F-4504)A 2013 PW sWM=SL 55D471D Net Area 13,500 5,280 5,280 5,280 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,400 Programming - Summary • 10 —12 acre site (assuming flat site) • Operations and Maintenance Building — Staff offices, crew rooms, lunch / muster area, training /conference room space, locker rooms • Shop • Parking • Covered and Open Storage Programming — Summary (cont'd) • Identified Needs — Fleet maintenance — Fueling — Traffic Signs — Traffic Signals Property Search - General • Criteria — West side of 1-5 and centralized to City: • Between S 304t" Street and S 348t" Street • Between 11t" Ave SW and 28t" Ave S — Land use — ideally compatible with surroundings — Property impacts— minimize impacts to surroundings — Opportunity Cost (Tax impacts) • Existing site • City properties • 10-11 acre parcels —hard to come by. • Consolidate multiple — hard to come by and more costiv. Property Search -Boundaries -tic zwz�,trik Seaport Fred Meye r IM Lakeland `1�N ortn . eel L'ske Parr �r'.S�P.f�`�d�35' ~ Weil and's Pai v Y- -ins cies Ii Gar en .. 0 HOACO1Sr T,aca r.0ya 1��ild waves Theme . and %6)ater Park N Fife Heo: gle 15 minute travel time west city limits to 1-5. 15 minute travel time south city limits to north city limits. Site 1—Existing Site + more PROS -Existing Use -Minimal natural environment impacts -1-5 one side CONS -Property purchase ($8-$10 M) -Site is not level -Construction stag -Apartments to south. FUTURE EXPANSION S,3 AREA $9 C� Al 511 If Or I1 1r If +� + EXPANDED SITE 70 B2 f + f + f F 12.0 ACRES Ju r + 1+ 1 F j NEW SOUND TRANSIT RAIL ROUTE EA B I W 81 1 h3 ss + --- 0, F F-- P2 — —— Pi VI_��EXISTING SITE IEl A-'ARTMENTS LANDSCAPE BUFFER Site 2 - City Property South of 312th PROS • City owned property • Flat site • Compatible surrounding land use (school to south) CONS • Mitigate loss of park amenities. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG S7REET FRONTAGE A7I tch, STREET (E) HISTORICAL — — SOCIETY SkALDING I I P2 + 99 �* F I I I I '00J ir OF as rT 3 Bl1f: R ARF4 REPRESENTS A Ip ACRE SITE. r STEEL LAKE PARK 9-18P2 L _ JC—Dr . f, 1 f----, Hf IP31 M H7 L I n (E) SOCCER HELD I I �� M I giS Lj Is4 s,o' I -_....._____art sis Al --- Li L1 L1 L1 c— St 77s3 V Y Site 3 — Undeveloped Private Property PROS CONS • No impacts to existing developed • $16+ M property cost. use. • Wetland mitigation required. • Residential use surrounding. • Good arterial access • Loss opportunity for other development. -- -- -- -- ----- -- ------ C3--=--� uuuu` - -- — — — — — — — — — — — _ — — I 87 I R2 S / n n I nn :!tB as I H U H U II iil I ------- 61 — — — — — —— —�I S3 L_J C----------------- ------------------ T--T- S9 — — 81 A,3 so 5 3747H 57 M;D N ieAWN REQUIRM Construction — Current Program* SITE 1: Existing Site — Expand to North SITE 2: Steel Lake Park Annex SITE 3: Private Property Pridevelope nary Per site Land / TOTAL COST DIFF. Mitigation FROM Costs PREFERRED M mild ALTERNATIVE 17 Preferred Site — Site 2 • Least cost — city owned property. • No property acquisition / displacements. • Level site. • Easy construction staging away from existing operations. • Compatible surrounding use / buffer. • Mitigatable park impacts. Proposed Mitigation LANDSCAPE BUFFER S. ]12[h SYREE7 A LC N G STREET F RONTAGE (E) HISTORICAL Y' "• Parking = SOCIETY BUILDING� � ` P2 � Maintained iF11 P2 Added r «• 1 �u •fl FPTI; Z?� l Hi Skate Park wE7C Wo�UPFE vs I U I z •/ (E)SOCCER HELn 4 Replacement • AREA REPRESENTS I I (• I +r %0 ACRE SITE / 4. 1 1 1 i 1 L3 3 1 • I I r I iP3HI s,s �I II } - •, �1��'; , I I I � �� __ Perimeter Walking Path ;� •! .1 r j�seo� i I I I I IYI r STEEL LAKE PARK Baseball Field )��nFl I Replacement* __ Li L1 W C _ s, s2 53 ass J ems, Options Considered 1. Select "Site 2" (SW corner of S 312th Street and 28th Ave S) as the preferred location for the new Joint Use Operations and Maintenance Facility and authorize $250,000 in expenditures from unallocated capital improvement funds (Fund 401 and Fund 306) to advance preliminary design. 2. Select alternative site as the preferred location for the new Joint Use Operations and Maintenance Facility and authorize $250,000 in expenditures from unallocated capital improvement funds (Fund 401 and Fund 306) to advance preliminary design. Mayor's Recommendation Option 1: Select "Site 2" as the preferred location for the new Joint Use Operations and Maintenacne Facility and authorize $250,000.00 in expenditures to advance preliminary design. Questions?