Res 91-058
RESOLUTION NO.
91-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF PARKLANE
ESTATES, DIVISION 2, DESIGNATED AS KING COUNTY
BUILDING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT FILE NO. 589-21.
WHEREAS,
the preliminary plat
for Parklane Estates,
Division 2, designated Building and Land Development File No. 589-
21, was approved subject to conditions on June 20, 1989, by King
County Ordinance No. 9028¡ and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Federal
Way for
approval
of the
final plat
for the above-referenced
preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, City of Federal Way Community Development staff,
having reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the
conditions of the preliminary plat and to the provisions of Federal
Way Zoning Code Chapter 16; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
section 1.
Findinqs of Fact.
The Federal Way city
Council makes the following Findings of Fact:
1.
The Findings of Fact, as contained in the Reports
of King County Subdivision Hearing Examiner dated
June 2, 1989, are adopted by reference.
2.
The final plat for Park lane Estates, Division 2,
Building and Land Development File No. 589-21, is
in substantial conformance to the preliminary plat
and
is
in
conformance
with
applicable
zoning
ordinances or other land use controls in effect at
eJo;pr
8.
the time of submittal of the substantially complete
application.
3.
All
conditions
recommended
by
the
Zoning
and
Subdivision
Hearing
Examiner
King
for
County,
Washington,
contained
in
the
reports
and
recommendation to King County Council dated June 2,
1989, have been satisfied, and/or satisfaction of
the conditions have been sufficiently guaranteed by
the applicant.
4.
Ninety percent of all required improvements have
been made and sufficient bond has been accepted by
King County as financial guaranty for completion of
all required plat improvements.
5.
All taxes and assessments owing on the property
being subdivided have been paid.
6.
Tract A shall be dedicated to the City of Federal
Way for open space upon recording of the plat.
7.
Tracts C, D and E shall be dedicated to the city
without a commitment that these tracts are to be
considered
fulfillment
for
of
the
open
space
requirements for properties outside this plat.
Pedestrian access at the southerly extension of
15th Place s. W. shall be delineated in a manner
satisfactory
City
to
staff
to
ensure
adequate
protection for pedestrians using the roadway.
-2-
Section 2.
Approval.
Based upon the above Findings
of Fact and pursuant to Federal Way Zoning Code 16.410, the final
plat of Parklane Estates, Division 2, King County Building and Land
Development File No. 589-21 is approved, subject to satisfaction of
those conditions as contained in the Report of Subdivision Hearing
Examiner dated June 2,
1989, attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3.
Recordinq.
The approved and signed final
plat, together with all legal instruments pertaining thereto as
required pursuant to Federal Way Zoning Code, shall be recorded by
the City in the King County Department of Elections and Records.
All recording fees shall be paid by the applicant.
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way
this 16th day of
April
, 1991.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
~kv~
OR, DEBRA ERTE
-3-
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-58
91L121
April 10, 1991
April 16, 1991
-4-
!::Y!fIß/ r'i9 ~.
.}II no 1, 196 q
Ire Ilif
1t1r'¡ ,
Of PI eo Of THE ZONING Arll) oURDIVISION EXAMINER
----------ï<ÏÑë-r.;¡ii¡¡:iy -, ,i, ;'¡¡iiif.;¡:õ¡¡------------
./
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO Till: 'IIIC, COIHITY CQUNça.
,I
Building anoJ Lan" Do',oinnmcnt fiif. No.
Proposed Ordinanco 110, 89-130 ..-'
~UBJ!:Q"-
589-21
Ploposed Pla,( of 1'^i"L'IIV E.,'rH'.'
Located genelaiIy ho,w.on 16"h and 12th Avonues
Southwest an" qen",',iy "",woon Southwest 344th
and 347th Stroe"s (d all roads were extended!.
~~~:!.-.2.!:-"-!:£2~~!!::2~!.!.2!::~ '
Division's PreliminOty:
Division's rinaI:
'I'I"OVO, ,"hj.n.
'I'IHOVO, suhject
I m,,'¡ i f i ',d
^pp'OVo, subject
Im',ddioc!1
to conditions
to conditions
Examiner:
to conditions
"-"--"~!::~:!.-"-!"-2"-I:
"be Buiiùing ã"d Land 0"'-"°,.",0°' ",'.'isian's Preliminary
Report on Item No. 589-11 w", ,ooolvod by tbe Examiner on
Marcb J, 1969,
"-.f!lli£.J!!:~"-.!.!::£ :
After reviewing the 8uild,nn ,'noJ I",nd Development
Division's Report, examinin9 ava¡¡abI, information on file
with the application and vlsi'inn tho property and
surrounding area, the Examlno' conducted a public hearing
on the subject as follows:
The hearing on Item No. 589-2) w," op_nod by tho Examiner at
9:15 a,m, on May 25, 1989 in R',~,d.ng .nò Lanò Development
Division Mearing Room No.2, 3000 - i36th Place S.E., Suite A,
Bellevue, Washington, anoJ clnso': ,," In:02 a.m. Participants at
the public hearing and the exhib,'" offered and entered are
listed in the attached minu'.os. A ',«ba'.im recording of the
hearing is available in tho office of the Zoning and
Subdivision Examiner,
flNDINGSL CONCLUSIONS' RECOHIHliO'r!OIl: Having reviewed the
rëëõrdinthTs-iñã:ttë[:-the-Ëx.;';T~';,'-ñõw makes and enters the
fallowing:
""'-'J
Pog e 2
.u.!!~§. :
1.
Goneral Information:
STR:
Location:
Zoning:
Acreage:
Number of Lots:
,'1-21-'1
';"ne',11Iyhel:woon
^vcon",," Southwest
,..,Iweon Southwest
30rh Setoets (if
'Jore o"endod)
"R ',200
21.' ¡,.visod)
¡n? ¡,,'vio.d; proposed density
- cr, d,,/aor.)
1"""1"'. ho'w"on 5.000 and 9.000
,'I" ",.. (00 I
1i"")Ch',Ù s'n~le-family
,.sidenc.s
f.de,al Way Water and Sewer
DIstrIct
16th and 12th
ud genetaliy
¡'4th and
all roads
Typical I.ot 51,.:
Proposed Use:
Sewage Disposal:
Water Supply:
r.deral Way Water and Sewer
Ii,.s" i ot
11? - foderal way
Ii,n-fodc',,)JWay
fire District:
School Distrio.:
2.
The applicant ptoposes tn ""I,divi". 23.' acres into 109
single-Eami1y residen',ial oui I"ino lots which range in
size from 5.000 to 9,000 'q",1te feet, The lot size range
is permitted by the lot ,v.")1ing provisions of KCC
2LOS.OSO. The propeny is """iEied 5R '.200.
J.
An Environmental Impao ",)"'mon' is not required. The
Building and Land Dev.lorm"n, Division manager issued a
Mitigat.d Determination '" "..ncinn",c,)nc. (MDN5).
febtuaty 1'. 1989, Tho MIi"" '"'("lte.s the applicant to
obtain drainago easements (IOJm downst.toam propetty
ownetS. An appeal of thi, 11I>IIS h"s boen withdr"wn.
4.
The 8uilding and Land D.volc'r.ment Division recommends
approval of the propos.d pla'., subject to 24 conditions.
Recommended Condition 110, i 1 ¡as stated on page II of the
Division's March 16. 1989 Ploliminaty Report. Exhibie No.
11 is revised. This revisinn is discu.ssed further in
Finding No.5. below, Th" ,l"rIie.nr accepts the
Division's recommended con"i' iooo of approval.
5.
The King County Departm.n'.- of Puhlic Works is studying
alternative east-west tou,"" in '.-he vicinity of Southwest
J4Hh Street. This projen " known as the 'Sourhwest
J4Hh Street extension,' fo'" al,.rnative routes are
being considered fot the Sou'hwe., ¡'4th Street
extension. Three of th..s" ,li'.tn",ives require varying
amounts of right of w"y òion~ 'he nOlth boundary of the
subject ploperty. An.rn", ivos l and 2 would requite a
50-foot wide right of way S'I ip Icompt ising one-half of a
10O-foot wide arteriai tinh, of wòyl along the entire
north boundary of the subjeer. ploperty. Alternative J
would require a 50-fooe 'Jido I igh, of way dedication only
in the northwest cornet of ,he subj.Ct ptoperty.
6.
Future funding of the ptoi.c,- is uncle"t beyond the
environmental impact evaluation Stage. A draft
environmental impact Stat.mon, is curtently being
circulated. Additlona¡ly. f'Hure Eunding of the Southwest
344th Street extension is uncio.. ojue to the fact that the
area is being incorpolat.d as the City of Federal Way. It
is not known whethet tho now (iry of federal Way will seek
to develop the SOuthwest ¡44th Street extension or not.
"'1'),/,
Pa g e )
The Department of Public ""'>. .¡n'l tho ßullding and Land
Development Division tocn""""" 'h,l' the. applican, dedicate
the necessaty right of wa'/ ,1 ,nn~ Ihe enti" north property
line. However. they """> I""'"mon" tho"~ this condition be
w.ived if an alternHivo ai,.,nnent is 'piected which does
not ,equi,e that ligh" nr "<>'/ "od,e."inn. Noting that the
applicant intends to dove",p 'he p,npo.,ed plat in two
d,visions, the Depaltmon' nr Pc,biie WOI'S "commends that
the second division (plopn"o" In, nos. 6) through 109)
should not be recolde" un' " '"".lhi iohm"nt of Southwest
344th Street has been cnmpi,""", Plovided, that the
estahlishment is comple',..' .,'h,"';;;;;;-:¡:;¡-, follnwin~
p"liminalY plH approv,,;. '1'1,.. "I>"ICc,,'r does not object
to th..e "commended ennd" ""'" ,<I "ppt oval "lated to
Southwest )44th St"et' ""..n""", ,"" ,,>.s fol density
compensHion for the ,¡.,h, nf W'! "o"!Catinn.
7 .
For any portion of the propet'! which is not included
within the West campus "P.' n"inage Pl00 (MDPI d"inage
basin, the applicant will 1>0 "'q"i"d to plovide surface
water management Conttnl' ':nn:;"'-n': wi'h KCC 9.04. The
applicant asks for oppol""ni'! tn P'Ov,"e a detailed field
topOqraphic survey which W,;, ",nv.. '.h". ':he eoti"
subject ploperty is 10",'" "'I ." h" 'ho h"in upon which
the West Campus MDP i' I"","d. -,"ch a 'opogtaphic survey
finding would contradict' h. 'Jonetalized West Campus MOP
basin boundary depicted in Exhibit No. ¡6 of this hearing
record. The Building and Land Dev.lopment Division
believes that the topography ',bso,ved during the site
reconnaissance conducted in plopatation for this hearing
confirms Exhibit No. 16, IIow"vol. 'he nivision has no
objection to providing ':h" Ji'"lioJnt oppoltunity to
conduct a topographic fi.¡" "'"v"y which may prove
othe¡wise.
8.
NO party appeared at th. pubuo hoOting to oppose to
express concern regarding <his proposed plat. The record
contains one letter of npposi,ion, flom Dalla Wright. Her
letter expresses concern re~at"ing diminishing wildlife.
traffic, school enlollmon' ."owth, and ~uality of iife.
9.
Except as noted above, 'ho [,J<"", analy.,i, and
recommendation plesentorl in 'ho Division of Building and
Land Development Preliminary ".pOI': dated March 16, 1989
(published March ), 19BOI ",e unoont.sted and they ate
incorporated hOle by l.ce"nee. 'copy of the Division of
Building anrl Land Developm"n' l.pOtt will be attached to
the copies of the Examine¡'s report which are submitted to
the Xing County Council.
s.Q!l.s.!:!L~.!.~,-
l.
Based upon the whole lecolrl,lnd aocolding substantial
weight to the determination 01 .nvi,onmental significance
made by the Division of Bui iding and Land Development, it
is concluded that approva¡ of this subdivision as
recommended below would not conS'itute a major action
significantly affecting the guaL,y of the environment,
'11 evidence of environmen,,¡ impact relating to the
proposed action and reasonabi- aite¡natives to the
ploposed action have been ine¡,,'¡-d in the rewieo and
consideration of this actinn,
2.
If approved subject to tho conditions recommended below.
the proposed subdivision w,j I compiy with the goals and
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Subdivision and
ZonIng Codes. and other official ¡and use controls and
policies of King County.
,':" .'1
Pa~. 4
3.
If app[aved subject ',0 I,h" o"n<1I'..ons ,ecammondod below,
this p,apasod subdiviSIon 'J,; i make app,op,iate p,ovision
for the public health, .afp,.y and gono'al welfare and fa!
drainage ways, SI.,OOI.S, o'.hp, r"hlic ways, wato, supply,
and sanitð<y wastes: and i'. wId ".lV. '.ho public use and
i n t" OS '..
4.
The conditions ,ecammond"d on '.h" "ivioion of Building and
Land Development's Plellm,n,1I,/ Perall; .. amended below aro
in I;ho public intelp", .nd "," ":,Bonahle ,oqui,ements.
~DATION:J
GRANT preliminary approval '0 '.ho. "rooos.d ol.t of ParUane
Estatos as doscribod in Exhibi'. No. Ó, õubj.ct to tho fOllowing
conditions for final pIal, .no'o".,;,
/.
ø
Compliance with all pJal.'.lnn o,ovisions of Title 19 of the /'
King County Code.
All persons having an n~nn""'or ,n'.ore.>!; in tho subject
propertyshallsignono.Io"f.,,:poftheCi ~plat.a, V'/
dedicatioo which includ"" '.1", '.nn"'n. H' :o,th ln Klng
County Council Motioo No, '0',2.
r?5 Tho area and dimension" nf ,'ii ¡O'.S shail meet the minimum
¡equiroments of the S-R 7,2QQ zon. classification Or shall
bo as shown on the fac. of '.h. ,polaved prolimioary plat,
whichovor is larger. IMloo, ,.viõiooõ may bo cansidorod.1
e~The applicant must Oh'.,l,n fin.'" '1pl>tov, , from the King
1/z.~ County Health Departm.nl.. "2.J'1..cS'-q
/ All construction and urgr'ldln', of public and private roads
shall bo done ln accardanc. with tho King County Road
~tandardS established one adopt.d by Ordinance No. 8041.
. If a~ aroa-wido fire prot.cl..on ass.essment is,autharizod
by Klng County p!lar 0,0 l,n,'; reCO[d,ng of thLS plat, this
plat shall bo subject '.0 .'n'/ ""."smen'. provided by that
o[dinance.
Ifþf Tho applicant must abt.in '.h" approval of the King County
V Firo Marshal for tho adeq"acy of tho fire hydrant, water
maln, and fire flow standard., of Chapter 17.08 of tho King
_/caunty Code. f¿4r /J/ lo/§¡(/ðØf <>¡=- pi!):lf!n;?-t..- W~
~ Flnal plat approval sh;¡ii '.o'Jire full compliance with
drainage provisions sot fo,l.Io ,n 'ing County Cado 9.04 and
1Ver'- (}J CUrren'. sto,m draina9P '"O"i""'.nl,., and ~uidelines as
"J//# establlshed by Surfac. w".." /<"nanemeo'.. Compliance may
rrfrlr;,..; result In reducing '.h. num".o H,I/or ¡ocal.ion of lots as
r?"~ shown on the p[eJiminaoy app,oved plat. "Exhibit A"
I~')J~' attached to this ,eport r.p'"".nts par tions of the Code
V" and reguirements that applY '.0 a¡l plats.
/, Due to the erosion hazard anri/ar the need for protection
o~~af p,opased drainfield ar.a", clearlng shall be limited to
[pf.,..¡) those areas requi[ed fa, con"'.[uction of roadways and
rtpV'" utilitles prior to rocorriln'j.
¿:
With the exception of I,h. ';o"l.h,,"t.,n sub-basin, the
final storm sewer desigo Cor the propooed subdivision
shall conform to the requirements of the West Campus
Master Drainage Plan. Since the southeastern sub-basin ls
not within the West Campus 'aster Drainage Plan (see
Exhibit No, 16), the storm s.wer design shall conform to
'",',
Paqo ,
the standard requiremen" of rcc 9.04. The WeSt Campus
Master D,ainage Plan hound", '/, os contained in Exhibit No.
16 of this hearing 'ecoId, 5h',i] conttol the application
of this condition to ,'he r,n,', plo', unle.. the applicant
provides a detailed fio,d "'I""j,aph, ;;¡;ië¡;-modifies the
WeSt Capus HDP boun'],1fy--,n "hieh c"", >he basin
boundary defined by . or""""""'" rio,d "'Jlvey shall cont!ol
the "pplication oC thi" "",,", , , ion.
Seasonal ponding water occur" in ,he southeastern
sub-basin of the p[opozed """J,vision. The design of the
retention-detention facii",y shall fully compensate for
tbe ponding water which exi"s at these locations.
,::>If-../ @ The final engineerinq pl,n, "h"il (ully conform to the *":roE \VI,
'\',1)"'" requiled SEPA mitiqa' ion I" "" '" rin'l County approval.
;. /
ui. The King County Inte[im r",n"l'o['",on Plan {199D} and the
Feòeral Way Community Pl"n ,,"ow ',ho p,opo"ed construction
of a collector arterial, Sou"'WeSt ¡4Hh Street extension,
traversing northerly polt,ione< oC the p!oposed
subdivision. The numbe! of n'.w lOts and trips generated
by the p!oposed subdiv,.inn co,n", ibutes to the need for
the new arte[ial.
~
Iì ¡J, f¡.
w.þ¡.
J.?~ç.
,1ØÞ
,11\)0' ë!).
To plovide Cor the possihio .." 'e, i.); loadway alignments.
the applicant shaJJ dedic", . ,i9h.' oC way measuring 5D
Ceet ¡-,>--width and eXtenrlin9 ""'t-;Nst "long the entue
north property line. rhe "'v,,.d preliminary plat
(Exhibit No. 61 shaJj h" lo"""iqnn; to accoomodate the
proposed right of way. plio[ '0 final engineering plan
approval by King County. rh,. condition may ~e waived by
the King county Depa"ment of Public Works a",J Building
and LH,d "evelop"en, DivisCon U an alternative roadwa,
alignment is selected which ",oes not traverse the subjett
property, ,This condition,"' " .x ire one year"fo_ltowingt-2..0-.cc
Council"action on this P[.¡¡"coalY plat if K ng County <-'7
fO'lls to establish a ¡44th s" .nt extension right of way
during that period. Soe .1'" Condition l¡.B, below.
¿Phase II, lot nos. 63 'hlO"')" '09. shall he delayed for
one year from the date of Co"nry Council action on the
preliminary plat of Park i"o E",a,es, in order to provide
opportunity to establish the I ight of ~y necessary to
accommodate the Southwe" ¡""h S"eet XCension. If
establishment does nOt occur within one ear from the date
of County Council action, th'.n no d.dication shall be
requited and the plat may hn ,.corded accordingly. If
establishment is complet.ò wi'hin one year and does not
require dedication, the pI", m.', be recorded without
(!; dedication and withou~ woi"in'l ,he Cull required year.
There shall be no direct vehicular access to or from 12th
~ Avenue Southwest from thno. io','s which abut it; DIV. !(ONLY)
Access to the subdivision 5ha', be over a full-width
maintained county toad, òed,r."eò anò improved to county
standards.
The planter islands rif an,' wi,hin the cuI-de-sacs shail
be maintained b the abuttin1 iot owners This shal
stated on the face of 'he fin,)i plat. .
e) If lot make-up area is [equired, calculations
demonstrating compliance, inriudin9 the provision of
sufficient flat, dry, usabie Open spaCe. must be submitted
prior to approval of the pian and ptofile. {This
','I'J..
Page 6
,equi,ement is sepatate [[nm ,1nd ;n addition to open space
f@)reqUiredinKCCI9.Ja'1
\ The applicant shall comply ~".h ~C': i9.18 by paying a Cee 'A,~
to the Pat's Division in-I,"".'."'. r"ov"lin~ n.n-si'e open c.¡.illv,-c1.,
space, (KCC ¡9.J8 .".."0\""".. "'" r",m",., fol .aid fe. If.')?
amount.)
~ A homeo~ners associal,ion or '>'.I,cI "Olkable olganization J./tfl::1J""
sball be establtShed to I.b. "'.isfaction of 8udding and ^...JIIO
Land Development Division -hich provides ¡or the ownership (J<'~
and continued maintenance o¡ 'hp open space atea!s). h
¿The ¡ollowing have been '-"',.11" i,hod by ,"PA as nec.ssary
f,¡rt-: ¡;>!Irequirements oC this rlovol"I',,"'n', ,1" mitiga'ion. The
.ðI}f¡14V applicanJ. shall demonc'.' "'." ""'"nll"noo ~il.h these items
nJ"LYJi!J prior to final apPlov.,1.
....Jfð. r'V'- The applicant sha¡¡ obta,n rlrainage easements ¡rom J,}1.1JWS
Bit" do~nstream property o~n", (01 pI ior to Building and ~
Land Developmen' Division onnineering plan approval.
These easements shal I .Hond ¡,om the subdivision '0
an easement, righl. nr ~"',/, 01 n"'."ral drainage
¡eature, ~hichev., ic "':""I"",hl. 1.0 '.he 8uilding and
Lanrl Developmenl. nivi,:,o" Enninpe,inq Revie~ing Unit.
A King County Bui ',lin', ",,'I r..1nd Opv.lopment Oivision
approved storm drain,,"o '",nvey"nce ,ystem shall b.
~ constructed ~i'hin t.he pocempntois).
.ig The number oC lots shaii hp ,,'rluo.d '0 generate less than
/J' \ 10 peak-hour, pea,-dil.o',nn '.Iips I.hrough the
11111. interspction of SR l8/S? i", "nIPS. s 'he applicant chooses
~ I" to voluntarily contributp a I',o-,...a 5ha,e in the amount
o'f $5,785.00 to King Co"n'., r", '.I.offit: iml"ovemonts to .
this intersection. FIf-¡O 11-7...'-- 8q{CO"tOfCHoc-ILI#,F-ILIi')
/. A public 'rail easement. shail h. d.dica'ed to King County
r/$;,.7 witbin the 8PA easement. ^ '.Iail shall be constructed
~v within the easement, the "id,.h.. anrl improvements matching
í.)?1I,S those approved for the open 'r"'C. '.0 the south. The
. details shall be ~or'ed nu'. WI '.h '.he Parks Oivision and
¡)ð!l> Lð7ltit. the Subdivision Technical Co"mi'.t...
JL'.: fh?("The applicant shall provide ., ,.u,Pt from the Bonneville~ðtb~
°;.q¡ ~po~er Administ'ationthat gl"nl;s.p..,mission for the coFfJ,f,Ift.I:771P/.
~,1-;r.'If7I. proposed road and trail I,hlO"'lh ,he easemen, and for openp"hìrD9
e.<;¡;,.,¡,. space improvements, if any, ~,I,h,n the easement. II--cz-ø- 0
p ~
DHft
Redesign Tract B, serving in', no,. ~ and 6, to ensure
safety and function. PiC/. I (Otf/LY)
ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 1989.
TRANSHITTED this 2nd day of Jun., ¡189 by certified mail to the
Collowing patties of [ecord:
John R. Ch[isUanson
William Fo[tm'n
POtUane Vento/B. HcAloney
John R. Ne~ell, Inc.
For>.una,o Pena
Jamp" ^. Doherty
',i!'I-.:;
Pogo 7
DHla W,ight
Dale Offin
Alvin C. Burnett
Sam S. Tsai
("n',,":/Dnn Ca"
,I"',n :1o l ,nn
0",1rl...,n'. (Otp,/ß. Hendtic~s
'-"d""'1 P"h.Sch./.!. Thtðsh..
TRANSMITTED '.his 2nd day of ,I"ne, i~B9 10 I.h. following parties:
Heidi Koch, Building and I,,>nd D"'J",ormOn', Division
Joe Miles, Building and Land Oov..",pmonl. Division
Gary Samak, King County ROJd, "i',"..,oo
Jeanette Veasey, King Counl.y Pð<'" Divi'ion
Michael Ster i ing
John L. Scott Realty, Ann: C,>ii ""'CO, Mgt.
Wallace, Wheeler Realty
Winde.mete Bealty
££!l.,-E_2!:_p..Ir,I'!.._2:2..~!:E~"
In or de< to appeal the teeommond'>';on of the Examiner, written
notice of app.al mu,t he fiJod wi'" I.ho CI.tk of the <lng
County Council with a fee of .1',n.II" ("h.ck payable to King
County Offic. of "nanCOl on 0' ""IOto ,Jun. 16, 19B9. If a
notice of appeal is filed, '.he 0, ¡~inal'-.ñ;¡-6-ëõpieŠ- of a
written app.al statemen'specifyin'J '.ho basis fot the appeal
and argument in support of I.ho .proal must be filed with the
Cler~ of the King County CounCli on Ot before June 23, 19B9.
If a wtitlen notice of app.a, Jnoj filing fee aëë-ñõ,-ËTïë;¡-
within 14 calendar days of tho rl.1'.0 of ',hi, "POtt, or if a
wtitlen appeal statement and .) '1IIm"nl, .t. not filed within 21
calendar days of the date or !.I,i.. 10rOII" I.ho Clerk of the
Couocil shall place a ptopo.eoj ",,¡.naneo which implements the
Examiner's tecommend.d actinn nn 'ho 'nend. nf 'he next
available Council meeting,
Filing requires actual d.livety '.0 'h. Office of the Cler~ of
the Council, Room 4D3, King County Courthouse, prior to the
close of business (4:30 p,m.1 on ',h. date due. Ptior mailing
is not sufficient if actual t.c.ip'. by the Clerk does not occur
within the applicable time rOt iod. Th. rxaminet does not have
authority to extend the Ume rOt ""J uni.ss '-he Office of the
Cle'~ is not open on the spocU".,1 olo:;ing date, in which event
delivery prior to the close of h"iness on the next business
day is sufficient to meet the filing tequirement.
Action of the Council Final. The action of the Council
approving or adopting a recommendation of the Examiner shall be
final and conclusive unless wP.hin thirty (3D) days from the
dHe of the action an aggtieved p.,ty Ot petson applies for a
writ of cettiorati ftom the Sup."Ot Court in and for the
County of King, StHe of W,"hin"'."n, fot the purpose of review
of the action taken.
M'NOTES OF THE MAY 25, i989 PUBLIC HEAPrNG ON BALD rILE NO.
589-21.
The hearing examiner in this mat'..r was Robett Stanley Titus.
Those participating in the heating were Heidi Koch, Joe Miles
and Gary Samak of Building and I.and Development Division, and
Dale Offin, Don Carr and Bt i.n McAioney. .
The following exhlbits Wete pl""On'od and entered into the
,ocor d:
Exhibit No. I
Building and Land Development Division
Preliminaty pepott, dHed March 16, 19B9
Exhibit No. 2
Exh ibi t No. )
Ex h i bit No. 4
Exhibit No. \
Exhibit No. 6
Exh i bi t No. 7
Exhibit No. 8
Exhibit No. 9
Exhibit No. 10
Ex h i bit No. II
Exhibit No. 12
Exhibit No. 1)
Exhibit No. 14
Exhibit No. 15
Exhibit No. 16
406JO;RST;ja
'"", .',
p, ge 8
,Application, "",°" Oç',oO.. 2B, 19BB
Envitonmen""' "hoç' ""'., "H.d Octob.. 28,
] 9 8 8
Mitigaten 00«°' ,",ion of NonsiqniUcance,
dated rebtuaty ,4, 1189
Affidavil, of t"", "<n'1, indicoUng Aplil 20,
1989'5"""""/""""n')
Revisod /":", '1."0" ,.."I..,u,-"y 6, 1989
Land Use Map (ç"lo..n!
TtðUic An" IY5i5 pte.pled by Centtðc, dated
Decembet 1988
Lette, ftom feno,,1 Way Public Schools, dated
Aptil ]9, 19Bq
Letter floo 'H'hino'.on NHutal Gas, dated
March 20, IQlJ'J
Letto< ftnm ,",1/ ;., Wtioht;, dated Harch 29, 1989
Revision 1.0 ""nd,'.ion No.1)
Altetn"-iv. 1'0,)" (,oyout
Lettel ftom III i,)n McAloney to G',y Samak,
d"-ed May 17, ¡'IR9
Lettet to Jim "t.,CY ftom Rex Knight, dated
febtuary 27, /0110
pottlon of Wo.;', c.,mpus Maste, Drainage Plan
\8Q - 2 J
'-1-. .
). Exh!b" A
S tanda rd Storm Dr a L~~,1;-=-';~~1.:;~~_"-!!_'-."-!..!~~l
a'J:LD a"provol of tbe <i'.lIn."", ,1n<i rn.dw.y plans is
r qu"ed p"or to 'ny ron"""", Ion.
b.. A separate ESC plan for ,hi" I'rojo<t .hall be submirted
with the engineerinq pl,n". The plan shall show are.. to
be cleated (limits of cl.."ng) and prov,de a schedule for
/ons"UCtion (conStruc"on .equence).
e/ Retention/detention (R/D) fac"i,ies shall be 10cHed in
"acts, unless located WI thIn ImproVed KIng County
rights-of-way. Maint.n,1n". ,"'C.55 shall be provided to
all faci Ii ties. Th!s WI II ""1""0 ,] 15-foot access
roadway to all manholes ,p/nl, ^<cess muSt also be
/ provided for maintenanc. of '.he en,,« pond,
Prior to recording of ,he final plat ,"ose portions of theOJ<-)J:
retention/deeention faclliq necessary to concrol the ~ .
flows discharging from the SIte shall be constructed andl/-7-'lCJ
operat ional,
/.
f~
Oil/water separation facIlI' ",' 'hall he provided at each
point of permanent sto,m d""n,'q. release from the si" so
contaminants do not en,., n.1"'ral "Hinage features. rn
addition '° scandatd "ng (o"n,y oil/warer separators, the
applican, is required '° provIde b!ofiHration prior to
discharge of stormwater !noo 'ny senSltive atea (e.g..
streams. weelands, lakes. .,c.). Such biofilrtation
includes 200 feet of broad. flar-bortom, grass-lined
swales, or equivalent sYStem.,
f.
Drainage outlers (Stub-ou,,) ohall be provided for each
individual lot, except fo, ,ho'e lots approved for
infilrtation by King County. S,ub-outs shall be shown on
the engineered plans and shal I conform to the following'
1.
Each outlet shall be sui<ably located H the loweSt
elevation on the 1o" so as '° service all future roof
downspouts and foo,ing dr"ns, driveways, YHd drains,
and any other surface or ,ubsurface drains necessaty
to render the lors suH,hle for their incended use.
Each outlet shall have free-flowing, positive drainage
to an approved Stormwa,er conveyance sYStem or to an '
approved outfall loca"on.
2.
Outlets on each 1°' sh,ll be 10cHed with a
five-foot-high, 2. x 4' H'ke matked 'storm. or
.drain., The stub-out sh'll eXtend above surface
level, be visible and b. 'ecu'ed to the stake,
J.
Pipe material shall confo," '° underdrain '
specificHions desc"bed ,n '(PS 7.04 and, if
non-mecaJlic, the pipe "",111 concaln WUe or other
accepcable detection fe","re,
L
Dr..nage easemenrs are ,','!""ed for drainage sYStems
designed to convey flowo '.',ough individual lots.
5.
The developer and/or conrr.HtOr is responsible for
coordinHing the loca"on of all Stub-out conveyance
lines with respect to 'he "tilHies (e,g.. power, gas,
t~lephone, televiSlon),
6,
All individual stUb-outs .hall be privHely owned and
maincained by the lot hompowner.
J 04 5 0
g.
In some cases, on-51," tnfll',ra"on SYStems may be
accepted for decen"on for '.he lots dep.nding on soil
conditions. To derermtno ',h. 'ú-;-ë.blllty of the soil for
infil"Hion sYHems, a 'Otl, r.p°rt thH includes
percolHion teStS an~ a '011 lo~ oak.n H 6-foot minimum
depth shall be submlt"'~ "y .1 professional engineer or
soil specialist. This :;h,111 tnc¡u~e, H a minimum,
informHion on soil texcur", oepth to seasonal high Water
and the occurrence of mn"',no "n" .mporviou. layers. The
report shall also addre" pnton"al down gradient impacts
due to increased hydraulIC loadIng on slopes and
struCtures. Soil permeability daea obtained from the
design of the septic sYStem may b. used for the drywell
retention system, prov¡de~ ~ðta is submitted verifying
that no impervious layer .Xl'" -,thin 6 feet of the soil
surface. If the soils r"pnre is 'pproved, the
infiltrHion systems sh,," t", tn"-"'ed at the time of the
bUilding permit. A no,. '0 ,t",; "ffoct shall be placed on
the map page of the ,"onr""" "ncI,,'ont. Th. drainage plan
and the recorded documont "","I .ndicate each lot approve
for infiltrHion.
h.
Include -ith the drainage pl,n a do-nStream analysis.
This analysis muSt eXtend for a mtn'mum diStance of If¡
mile from the point of r.l.". of each flow discharging
from the site. The analy,," """, a~dress any exiSting
problems -ith floodin~, o,'r,'"".y, overtopping, scou"ng,
sloughing, erosion and '."""'n.."nn of any drainage
facility, -hether naeur"1 nr ".1n-ma~e. Probable impaces
due to construceion of the projeCt muSt also be addressed
-ioh respect to these same concerns. Where this analysis
reveals more restrictive cond"ions, more stringent
drainage 'ontrols may be requlled than would other-ise be
necessary for a project of thts type. These controls may
include additional on-Site r,He andlor volume controls,
off-site improvements, or , oomb,narion of both. Any
off-site improvements -tll r"'luICe tho a?proval of all
affected property o-nees.
i.
Current Standard notes and ~SC notes, as established by
BALD engineering reviH. shall be placed on the engineered
plan..
j.
The following notes shall he prov,ded on the map page of
the tecorded document:
1.
For all lots:
.All building do-nspoutS. footing drains and drains
from all impervious surfaces such as paeios and
drive-ays shall be conneqed to the approved permanent
storm drain outlet as sho-n on the approved
construction dra-inqs I on file with the
Department of Pub.lic wor,'s'~'-Theplan for the..
connections shall be suhm,,«d -Ith the applicaeion
for any building permit, All connections of the
drains must be cons"uo<.'1 and approved pr¡"or to the
final building inspeottOn "pproval..
2 .
For any lots approve~ ror lo~,..dual infiltration:
.Individual lot inf¡lera"on sYStems shall be
constructed ac the time t"e resIdence is constructed
and shall comply -ith plans on fIle ac the PubUc
Works Record Center."