Res 91-076.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-76
�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING
APPLICATION TO KING COUNTY FOR RECYCLING FUNDS
PURSUANT TO THE KING COUNTY COORDINATED
PREVENTION GRANTS. (REPEALS 91-61).
WHEREAS, King County has monies available to it pursuant
to the Coordinated Prevention Grants for the purpose of achieving
waste reduction and recycling goals, and
WHEREAS, currently available information indicates that
suburban cities will be able to share approximately $715,000.00 in
1992 and in 1993, and
WHEREAS, the City has been advised b�r Department of
Ecoloqy of the allocat�on of additional funds. beyond those
authorized by the council by the passage of Resolution 91-61: and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to take advantage of the full
funding sources available for this project; and
WHEREAS, to be eligible for such funds the City must
evidence an intent to apply to King County for Coordinated -
Prevention Grant monies and evidence.a commitment by the City to
supply matching funds equaling 3�5 40 percent of the total project
costs of �Cri-98�A�9 5322 , 004; and
WHEREAS, Federal Way's application is expected to be in
the approximate amount of , 5193,202, which amount
includes funding for a recyclable start-up and collection process,
and community and yard waste start-up, education and hazardous
�aste, bulky items and special collections, and
WHEREAS, implementation of a recycling program is
important �o prevent degradation of the environment and adverse
ORIGINAL
� � �
effects on public health, safety and welfare; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL
WAY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council authorizes application by
the City to Ring County for Coordinated Prevention Grant monies in
the approximate amount of $�33,202. The Cit�r com�xits to s�gply
matching func�s equaling 40 pe�cent o€ the total project costs under
this program, equali�g approximatel�r $128,802. The received funds
shall be �sed for the purposes of developing a recyclable start-up
and collectian process, and the development anc� implementation af
the community and yard waste start-up, education and haza�dous
waste, bulky items ar�d special callection system.
Section 2. Renealer. Resolut�or� 91-61 is heFebg
repealed.
RESOLVED by, the City Cauncil of tkte Cit� af Fede�al Way,
Washington, t�iis 17th day of Sevtember , 199�.
CITY O�' FEDERAI, WAY
. �I�
�
ATTEST:
,_ . %� , 1 �.�i
. . �-
�
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�
C Y ATTO EY, SANDRA DR SCO L
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: September 12, 1991
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: September 17, 1991
RESOLUTION NO. 91-�6
LA\EF\RES\91-0132.
�
�
,
�
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89POOl6
D.
E.
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION OF ENVIROIlJ1ENTAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (StPA),
RCW 4J.21C, the responsible official of the Building and
Land Development Division (BALD) issued a mitigated thres-
hold deterJnination of non-significance (MDNS) for the pro-
posed development on October J, 1989. This detennination is
based on the review of the environmental checklist and other
pertinent documents, resulting in the conclusion that the
proposal would not cause probable significant adverse im-
pacts on the environment ~ the following measures are
complied with:
1.
A lOO-foot buffer shall be placed around wetland On?,
with an additional 15-foot BSBL beyond the buffer. The
wetland and the buffer shall have an NGPE placed upon
them and shall be placed in a separate tract.
2.
To protect the function of the NGPE around the wetland,
a fence sholl be constructed along the eastern. rear lot
lines of lots 14 through 22. Fence detail shall be
submitted to and approved by the King County BALD Sub-
division Products Section at the time of Road Plan and
Profile/Drainage Review.
NOTE: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC)
Plan Guidelines are to be strictly adhered to during the
entire period of project development due to the ESC rating
on the site of 16 ES (which reflects moderate site topo-
graphy, relatively small lot size, high lot density, and
on-site wetland area). .
Agencies, affected tribes and the public were offered the
opportunity to comment on or appeal the detennination for
fifteen days. After the close of the comment/appeal period,
any comments asking for a reconsideration of the threshold
determination were reviewed and considered.
The mitigated determination of non-significance was
appealed, and the SErA hearing was conducted on November 16,
1989. No decision on SErA has been made at this time. This
report will be modified to reflect the Examiner's decision
on the SErA appeal at the hearing date.
AGENCIES CONTACTED:
1.
King County Natural Resources & Parks Division:
"Parks Division has no intel'est in dedication of this
open space to King County."
2 .
King County Planning. & Community Development Division:
See Attachment 2.
3 .
King County Fire Protection Engineer:
See Attachment 3.
4 .
Seattle-King county Health Department:
The comments from the Health Department have been
incorporated into this report.
5.
Federal Way School District 1210:
"The proposed subdivision will affect Silver Lake
Elementary School, Illahee Junior High School, and
P'iOPOSED PLAT ')f CA~rUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89POOl6
Federal Way High School. At the present time, both
Illahee and Federal Way have adequate space .for addi-
tional students. silver Lake students are presently
housed in temporary facilities until the new silver
Lake Elementary School is opened in the fall of 1990.
Therefore, at the time of opening, Silver Lake Elemen-
tary will be at capacity. Federal Way School District
would also like the following to be addressed:
1. Safe walkway for children; widened shoulder
is not adequate.
2. Crossing lights.
3. Turn-off area for school bus loading and
unloading. "
6.
Federal Way Sewer District:
"Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer
system by construction of a collection systeJU on the
site. "
7.
Federal Way Water District:
"Water service will require an improvement to the water
system by construction of a distribution system on the
site. "
8.
Washington State Department of Ecology:
See Attachment 4.
9.
Washington State Department of Fisheries:
No response.
10.
Washington State Depar~ment of Natural Resources:
No response.
11.
Washington State Department of wildlife:
The Department of wildlife supports the protection
measures placed on the existing wetland.
12.
Washington State Department of Transportation:
Washington State Department of Transportation reviewed
the proposed plat and concluded that the traffic gen-
erated by this development will not hav~ a significant
adverse impact upon any state highways.
13.
King County Conservation District:
"The King County Conservati'Jn District recommends the
following development actions:
1.
Minimize vegetative removal and disturbance.
2.
Install Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control
facilities per plan prior to commencing mass
clearing and grading operations.
Where possible, avoid soil disturbance during
rainy season.
3.
4.
Install streets, util i ties, and stonn drains prior
to construction of buildings.
5.
Avoid dumping soil, vegetative waste, or debris
over steep slopes.
E:)¡"::S~D PLAT OF CA1-\PUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89POO16
14.
F.
6.
Denuded ground cover should be protected within
15 days of final disturbance of a particular area.
Seeding, mulching, netting and mechanical fonns of
protection can be used to stabilize exposed soils.
7.
8.
All stockpiles of excavated soil or fill material
should have erosion protection at all times.
9.
Connect all roof drains to existing or future
stonn system.
10.
Design and management of sub-surface drainage
system should be planner prior to construction and
implemented according to that plan. All water
should be COnveyed to a safe, non-erosive outlet.
All road designs should Use available soils
infonnation. "
11.
METRO:
See Attachment 5.
NATURAL ENVIROIlJ1EN'I::
1.
Topography: The site is gently rolling and slopes from
west to east. A large depression covers approximately
the east one-third of the site. This depression con-
tains the wetland described in Section F.3. of this
report. The steepest area Occurs around the edge of
the depression, with the average slope of 15 to
25 percent.
2.
Soils: T1oIo surface soils are found on this site per
King County Soil Survey, 1973.
a.
b.
3.
The west two-thirds of the site is classified AgC.
A£.Ç; - Alderwood gravely, sandy loam, 6-15% slopes.
Runoff is slow to medium and the hazard of erosion
is moderate. This soil has a moderate limitation
for foundations, due to a seasonally high water
table and, slope. It has a severe limitation for
septic tank filter fields due to very slow penne-
abili ty in the substratum.
Approximately the east one-third ot the site is
classified Sk.
.sJ¡ - Seattle Huck, with less than H slope.
Runoff ponds and there is little or no erosion.
This soil has severe limitations tor building
foundations and septic tank t11 ter fields due to
high water table and organic content. This is a
class II soil and is used for seeded grass,
pasture, hay, blueberries and truck crops.
Hydrography: Part of a lower Puget Sound wetland,
No. 27, Type 1, is located on this site. A wetland
study was prepared by Shapiro and Associates on May 12,
1989. The King County wetland specialist reviewed the
wetland study and recommended the wetland with a
100-foot bUffer around it be placed in a Native GroWth
Protection Easement tract. See Condition 9.b. for
details.
PKupùSEu >'LAT OF CA1'.rvS hI ÙvE
FILE NO. S89POO16
G,
H.
1.
The site lies within the Lower Puget Sound sub-basin of
the Puget Sound drainage basin.
4.
Vegetation: This site is heavily wooded with a second
and third-grc-.th mixture of coniferous and broad-leafed
trees native to the Pacific Northwest.
The wetland vegetation consists of hardhack, wild
crabapple, salmonberry, and slough sedge.
5.
Wildlife: Small birds and animals undoubtedly inhabi t
this site; however, their population and species are
limi ted due to nearby development. No special or
endangered species are known to exist on or near the
property.
6.
Mapped Sensitive Areas: The Sensitive Areas Map Folio
indicates on Map No.6 that the east portion of the
subj ect property is wi thin Class III Seismic Hazard
Areas. The east one-third of the subj ect property are
designated wetlands.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The property lies within an already developed West Campus
neighborhood. The surrounding high-density urban land use
is single-family residentiaL The site is bounded on the
north by S.W. 323rd st., on the west by developed lots, and
on the east and south by open space tracts dedicated, to King
County.
The site itself is undeveloped.
GENERAL DESIGN:
1.
Internal Circulation: The internal roadway section
will be constructed to urban road standards with curb,
gutter, and sidewalks. Seventh Avenue Southwest ex-
tends from S.W. 323rd St. southward and tenninates in a
cul-de-sac,
2.
Lot Pattern: The applicant is using KCC 21.20.050 and
KCC 21. 08 to meet the minimum lot area requirements.
The applicant is proposing to use the make-up lot area
credited from the internal roadway.
The proposed lot and street layout is in conforJnance
with KCC Title 21, Zoning, and KCC Title 14, Road
Standards.
TRANSPORTATION PLANS:
1.
Traffic Generation: - It is expected that approximately
240 vehicle trips per day "ill be generated "ith full
development of the proposed division. This calculation
includes service vehicles (i.e. mail delivery, garbage
pick-up, school bus) which may currently serve this
neighborhood, work trips, shopping, etc.
2 .
Subdivision Access: The subject plat is bounded by
S.W. 32Jrd St. on the north and obtains access to S.W.
320th st. via 6th Avenue Southwest.
J.
Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been
reviewed under both SEPA and the criteria in King
County Ordinances 7544 and 8052, Adequacy of Existing
PROPOSE;) FL.;T Of C~'~rL'5 RIDGE
FILE NO. S89POO16
J.
K.
2.
Roadways and Intersections. A P,M. peak distribution
traffic analysis between the site and Interstate 5
along S. 320th St. "'as prepared by Christopher Brown
and Associates. The King County Traffic Engineer
reviewed this study and concluded that the subject plat
has no significant effect on the above mentioned road.
4.
The existing arterial system will accommodate the
increased traffic volume generated by this proposal.
Transportation Plans: The King County Tnterim
Transportation Plan indicates that S.W. )20th St. is
designated as a maj or arterial.
The subject subdivision is not in conflict with this
plan.
PUBLIC SERVICES:
1.
Schools: The subject subdivision will be served by
Silver Lake Elementary, Il:1ahee Junior High, and
Federal Way Senior High Schools. See Section E-5 of
this report for comments received from the school
district.
2.
Parks and Open Space: The nearest community park is
Alderbrook Park, located approximately 3/4 mile south-
east of the site.
KCC 19.38 requires subdivisions of ten acres or larger
in this zone classification to either provide on-site
common open space or to pay a fee to the Parks Division
for establishment and maintenance Of neighborhood
parks.
The applicant's design provides no suitable open space
area and, therefore, payment of a fee will be required
as a condition of approval.
3.
Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability
from Federal Way Water and Sewer District indicates
that water is presently available to the site in
sufficient quantity to satisfy King County Fire Flow
Standards.
Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service
facilities must be either in place or bonded to meet
King County Fire Flow Standards.
UTILITIES:
1.
Sewage Disposal: The applicant proposes to serve the
subject subdivision by means of a public sewer system
managed by the Federal Way Water and Sewer District.
A Certificate of Sewer Availability, dated November 9,
1988, indicates this sewer district's capability to
serve the proposed development.
','he Health Department has recommended preliminary
approval of this proposed method of sewage disposal,
and the Building and Land Development Division concurs
with this recommendation.
Water Supply: The applicant proposes to serve the
subject subdivision with a public water supply and
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAHPUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89POOI6
distribution system managed by the Federal Way Water
and Sewer District.
A Certificate of Water Availability, dated November 9,
1988, indicates this district's capability to serve the
proposed development.
The Health Department has recommended preliminary
approval of this proposed method of water supply, and
the Building and Land Development Division concurs with
the Health Department's recommendation. '
L.
COMPREHENSIVE AND COMMUNITY PLAN:
1.
Comprehensive Plan:
This proposal is governed by the 1985 King County
Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Urban.
The proposed subdivision is not in conflict with the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Community Plans:
2.
The subject subdivision is located in the Federal Way
Communi ty Planning Area which designates the property
Single-Family with a density of 4 to 9 homes per acre.
The Area Zoning is SR-7200. See Attachment 2 tor
comments.
The subject subdivision is not in conflict with the
goals, guidelines, and policies of the Federal Way
Community Plan.
M.
STATUTES/CODES:
It approved with the recommended conditions in this report,
the proposed development will comply with the requirements
ot the County and State Platting Codes and Statutes, and the
lots in the proposed subdivision will comply with the mini-
mum dimensional requirements of the zone district.
N.
~:
The subdivision Technical Committee has not identified any
significant issues involved in the preliminary re\iew and
recommendations of this proposal.
O.
CONCLUSIONS:
The subject subdivision will comply with the goals and
objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will
comply with the require"'~nts of the Subdivision and Zoning
Codes and other official land use controls ot King County,
based on the conditions for final plat approval.
P.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the subject subdivision, revised and
received October 10, 1989, be granted preliminary approval
subj ect to the following conditions of final approval:
1.
Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of
the King County Code.
2.
All persons having an ownership interest in the subject
property shall sign on the face of the final plat a
ri'vic,5£D ;,'JÜ' CF C"':':F~~ :'¡J~L
FILE NO. S89POO16
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
dedication which includes the language set forth in
King County Council Motion No. 5952.
The area and dimensions of all lots
minimum requirements of the SR 7200
or shall be as shown on the face of
liminary plat, whichever is larger.
may be considered.)
shall meet the
Zone classification
the approved pre-
(Minor revisions
The applicant must obtain final approval from the King
County Health Department.
All construction and upgrading of public and private
roads shall be done in accordance with the King County
Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No.
8041.
If an area-wide fire protection assessment is
authorized by King County prior to final recording of
this plat, this plat shall be subj ect to any assessment
provided by that ordinance.
The applicant nlust obtain the approval of the King
County Fire Protection Engineer for the adequacy of the
fire hydrant, water main, and fire flolo' standards of
Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code.
Final plat approval shall require full compliance with
drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04
and current storm drainage requirements and guidelines
as established by Surface Water Management. Compliance
may result in reducing the number and/or location of
lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. The
following conditions represent portions of the Code and
reguirements and shall apply to £ll plats.
a.
BALD approval of the drainage and roadway plans is
required prior to any construction.
b.
A separate Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) plan
for this proj ect shall be submitted with the
engineering plans. The plan shall show areas to
be cleared (limits of the clearing) and provide a
schedule of construction (construction sequence).
c.
Retention/detention (R/D) tacili ties shall be
located in tracts, unless located within improved
King County rights-of-way. Ma intenance access
shall be provided to all facilities. This will
reguire a l5-foot access road'iay to all manholes
(R/D). Access must also be provided for mainten-
ance of the e"Ure pond.
d.
Prior to recording of the fir.al plat those
portions of the retention/detention facility
necessary to control the flows discharging from
the site shall be constructc:d and operational.
e.
Oil/water separation facilities shall be provided
at each point of pennanent stOrJn drainage release
from the site so contamina'.'ts do not enter natural
drainage features. In ad~ition to standard King
County oil/water separato':s, the applicant is
required to provide biofiltration prior to dis-
charge of stonnwater into any sensitive area (e.g.
streams, wetlands, lake., etc.). Such biofiltra-
PROPOSED PUT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89POOl6
f.
tion includes 200 feet of broad, flat-bottom,
grass-lined swales) or equivalent systems.
Drainage outlets (stub-outs) shall be provided for
each individual lot, except for those lots
approved for infiltration by King County. Stub-
out shall be shown on the engineered plans and
shall conform to the following:
1)
Each outlet shall be suitably located at the
lowest elevation on the lot, so as to service
all future roof downspouts and footing
drains, driveways, yard drains, and any other
surface or subsurface drains necessary to
render the lots sui table for their intended
use. Each outlet shall have free-flowing,
positive drainage to an approved stonnwater
conveyance system or to an approved outfall
location.
2 )
Outlets on each lot shall be located with a
five-foot-high, 2" x 4" stake marked "storJn"
or "drain". The stub-out shall extend above
surface level, be visible and be secured to
the stake.
3 )
Pipe material shall conform to underdrain
specifications described in KCRS 7.04 and, if
non-metallic, the pipe shall contain wire or
other acceptable detection feature.
4 )
Drainage easements are required for drainage
systems designed to convey flows through more
than one lot.
5)
The developer and/or contractor is
responsible for coordinating the location of
all stub-out conveyance lines with respect to
the utilities (e.g. power, gas, telephone,
television) .
All individual stub-outs shall be privately
owned and maintained by the lot home owner.
In some cases, on-site infiltration systems may be
accepted for detention for the l2U depending on
soil conditions. To deterJnine the suitability of
the soil for infiltration systems, a soils report
that includes percolation tests and a soil log
taken at 6-foot minimum depth shall be submitted
by a professional engineer, or soil specialist.
This shall in"lude, at a minimum, in!onnation on
soil texture, depth to seasonal high water and the
occurrence of mottling and impervious layers. The
report shall also address potential down gradient
impacts due to increased hydraulic loading on
slopes and structures. Soil permeability data
obtained from the design of the septic system may
be used for the drywell retention system, provided
data is submitted verifying that no impervious
layer exists within 6 feet of the soil surface.
If the soils report is approved, the inf iltration
systems shall be installed at the time of the
building pennit. A note to this effect shall be
placed on the map page of the recorded document.
g.
6)
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FI:'E NO. S89POO16
9.
The drainage plan and the recorded document shall
indicate each lot approved for infiltration.
h.
Include with the drainage plan a downstream
analysis. This analysis must extend for a minimum
distance of 1/4 mile from the point of release of
each flow discharging from the site. The analysis
must address any existing problems with flooding,
capaci ty, overtopping, scouring, sloughing,
erosion or sedimentation of any drainage facil i ty,
whether natural or man-made. Probable impacts due
to construction of the proj act must also be ad-
dressed with respect to these same concerns..
Where this analysis reveals more restrictive
condi tions, more stringent drainage controls may
be required than would otherwise be necessary for
a project of this type. These controls may
include additional on-site rate and/or volume
controls, off-site improvements, or a combination
of .both. Any off- site improvements will require
the approval of all affected property owners.
1.
Current standard notes and ESC notes, as
established by BALD engineering review, shall be
placed on the engineered plans.
j.
The following notes shall be provided on the map
page of the recorded document:
"All building downspouts, footing drains and
drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios
and driveways shall be connected to the approved
perJnanent storm drain outlet as shown on the
approved construction drawings' on
file with the Department of Public Works. This
plan shall be submitted with the application of
any building permit. All connections of the
drains must be constructed and approved prior to
the final building inspection approval." Those
lots that are designated for "Individual lot
infiltration systems, the systems shall be con-
structed at the time of the building permit and
shall comply with plans on file at the Public
Works Record Center."
The following conditions specifically address drainage
issues for this particular plat:
a.
Due to the erosion hazard and/or the need for
protection of proposed drainfield areas, clearing
shall be limited to those areas required for
construction Co: roadways and utilities prior to
recording.
b.
A Type 1 wetland is located on a portion of the
subj ect property. The following items shall be
addressed on the engineering plans and final plat:
1)
The wetland edge shall be field surveyed and
shown on the plans. The wetland and a
lOO-foot buffer shall be shown in a separate
tract and designated as a Native Growth
Protection Easement (NGPE).
A 15-foot building setback line (BSBL) shall
be shown from the NGPE boundaries.
2 )
10
PF.OPùSED ¡':..AT OF CAMPUS RI DGE
FILE NO. S89POO16
3 )
Based upon field inspection, the wetland
appears to be a closed depression with no
surface water outlet. The leO-year flood-
plain for the wetland shall be detennined.
The following criteria shall be used in
making this determination:
If the drainage basin area is less than
50 acres, use the 100-year/24-hour
storm.
If greater than 50 acres, use the 100-
year/7-day stonn.
c.
The applicant's engineering submittal shall
include a grading plan which addresses preparation
of the site for construction of roads and houses.
Comprehensive measures shall bs addressed on the
plan to minimize erosion and assure sediment-laden
water does not impact the wetland. A special
erosion control inspector shall bs retained by the
applicant to provide recommendations during imple-
mentation of the gradimi _p~~_a-,,-d_s_\!bmJ_t_we_ekly-
r_epo_r~s to the King County Development Inspection
Unit. The engineering plans shall outline this
requirement with descriptive notes and identify
the name and phone number of the individual re-
sponsible for assuring compliance,
T¿-;¿¡¿~
-=
To prevent downstream erosion impacts and a
reduction in water quality, initial roadway and
lot construction activity shall occur only during
the months of April through September. Construc-
tion plans shall be submitted well in advance of
the September 3 Oth deadline to assure that ade-
guate time is allowed for plan review/approval and
site stabilization after construction has pro-
ceeded. Final construction work may proceed past
these dates provided that the site is stabilized
and presents no serious erosion hazards.
10.
The following statement shall be shown on the final
eng ineering plan and recorded plat:
Building So~back. and Native Growth Protection
Easements
Structures, fill and obstructions (including, but not
limited to decks, patios, outbuildings, or overhangs
beyond 18 inches) are prohibited within the building
setback line (BSBL) and restricted floodplains (if
applicable), and within the Native Growth Protection
Easement(s) as shown.
Dedication of a Native Growth Protection Easement
(NGPE) conveys to the public a beneficial interest in
the land within the easement. This interest includes
the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes
that benefit the public health, safety and welfare,
including control of surface water and erosion, main-
tenance of slope stability, visual and aural buttering,
and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE
imposes upon all present and future owners and occu-
piers of the land, subject to the easement, the obliga-
tion, enforceable on behalf of the public by King
County, which permission must be obtained in writing
11
. "~; ~éé:J Pu..~ C>, Clc':Fi:S in D:E
FILE NO. S89POO16
19.
from the King County Building and Land Development
Division or its SUccessor agency.
Before and during the course of any grading, building
construction, or other development activity on a lot
sUbj ect to the NGPE, the COmmon bounda:cy between the
easement and the area of development activity must be
fenced or otherwise marked to the satisfaction of King
County or its successor agency.
11.
Southwest 323rd Street shall be improved , with curb,
gutter, and sidewalk where it abuts this site.
12.
Seventh Avenue Southwest shall be improved with curb,
gutter, and sidewalk.
13.
The planter islands (if any) within the cul-de-sacs
shall be maintained by the abutting lot owners. This
shall be stated on the face of the final plat.
14.
All lots adjoining an area or having area with a NGPE
restriction ~hall be provided with an acceptable
boundary delineation between the lot or portions of the
lot and the area restricted with the NGPE. Said
boundary delineation shall be in place prior to any
grading or clearing of the subdivision and remain in
place until a dwelling is constructed on the lot and
ownership transferred to the first owner-occupant.
15.
If lot make-up area is required, calculations
demonstrating compliance must be submitted prior to
approval of the plan a!1d profile. (This requirement is
separate from and in addition to open space required in
KCC 19.38.)
16.
The applicant shall comply with K.c.c. 19.38 by paying
a fee to the Parks Division in-lieu-of providing on-
si te open space. (K. C, C. 19.38 establishes the formula
for said fee amount.)
17.
A homeowners association or other workable organization
shall be established to the satisfaction of BALD which
provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of
the open space area (s) .
18.
The "panhandles" giving access to lots 11 and 14 from
the cul-de-sac shall have a minimum of 20 feet in
width.
The following have been established by SEPA as
necessary requirements of this development as mi tiga-
tion. The applicants shall demonstrate compliance with
these items prior tc final approval.
a.
A leO-foot buffer shall be placed around Wetland
No. 3327, with an additional l5-foot BSBL beyond
the buffer. The wetland and the buffer shall have
an NGPE placed upon them and shall be placed in a
separate tract.
b.
To protect the function of the NGPE around the
wetland, a fence shall be constructed along the
eastern rear lot lines of lots 14 through 22.
Fence detail shall be submitted to and approved by
the King County BALD Subdivision Products Section.
12
".c.; 'cC~ F:"'-.. ~, "'_,,,0 ".~~~
FILE NO. S89POO16
at the time of Road Plan and Profilel.Drainage
Review.
NOTE: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control
(ESC) Plan Guidelines are to be strictly adhered to
during the entire period of project development due to
the ESC rating on the site of 16 ES (which reflects
moderate site topography, relatively small lot size,
high lot density, and on-site wetland area).
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:
1.
The subdivision shall conform to KCC 16.38 relating to
grading on private property.
2.
Development of the subject property may require
registration with the Washington State Department of
Licensing, Real Estate Division.
3.
Preliminary approval of this application does not limit
the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required
perrni t or license from the State or other regulatory
body,
NL:FD:lg
12/13/89
TRANSMITTED TO PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER:
Graecen Construction, Inc.
1160 - 140th Ave. N.E., Suite E, Bellevue, WA 98005
Pac-Tech Engineering, Inc.
2601 S. 35th St., Suite 200, Tacoma, WA 98409
Heritage Land Development
10317 - 122nd St. E., Puyallup, WA 98373
Bob curtis
32628 - 7th Ave. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
Diana Kinared
1200 - lD,th Ave. N.E., Suite C-240, Bellevue, WA
98004
New Construction Services
17233 - 140th Ave. S.E., *5, Renton, WA 98058
Gail Bruce
10909 N.E. 4th, P.O. Box 97015, Bellevue, WA 98009
Peter Hayes
12443 B..l-Red Rd., Suite F, Bldg. B, Bellevue, WI.
98004
West Campus III Homeowners' Association
P.O. Box 7237, Federal Way, WI. 98003
Thaddeus Kledzik
522 S.W. 324th st., Federal Way, WA 98003
Ronald A. Cowan
32616 - 7th Ave. s.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
J. LaVillette '
515 S.W. 322nd st., Federal Way, WA 98023
Victoria How
32115 - 6th Ave. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
Eugene J. Haldas
P.O. Box 7578, Federal Way, WA 98003
Eileen Stauss
32636 - 7th Ave, S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
Jerian & Dale Peterson
c/o West Campus Division III, P.O. Box 7237,
Federal Way, WI. 98003
Mona Morris & Don Van Note
215 S.W. 327th Pl., Federal Way, ~A 98023
13
pROPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89POOl6
Dae Ann Poston
32208 - 7th P1. s.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
Mr. Robert Curtis, ChairJnan
Campus Wood Wetland Preservation Committee,
P.O. Box 7237, Federal Way, WA 98003
Thomas Cross, D.D.o.
30809 - 1st Ave. S., Federal Way, WA 98003
Richard Burris
P.O. Box 8062, Federal Way, WA 98003
Don & Rosemary Bitterman
32242 - 7th P1. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
14
j,
"
,
__1
---- - j
---------.
z~
~
,
~
~
------------
~~-!'r -
44"oV-!,
()/t,;
--
0
~
,
>
.
~
)
8'".
;Þ
CAMPUS RIDGE 4 EAST. w. M,
RAN6E
SHIP 21 NOJ:\T>i,
SECTION /8. TOWN
ATTAO-lMENT
'-'
,,"" ",""','
1"."""," ,;,,1 rO"""U"""
IJ", ,",01"""" V" "'O" -
- .'~,) '~-')
'::'s '
"Pil ,
::':;'~I",'?"IA(CË/VËD
. r ., ~"~
"~"I,> ADR ì r 1989
I'd., I':.""",,;
,.. "" 0,'>';"""'"
"-'~"hTo"" """",.<
, ""'"",,' A.."",
"". """, "'"""""'/
""',I '""";0
:'<)I;:):"~I\;iV~
horil 24, 1989
TO:
Divi S ion
FH:
R, :
The proposed plat is consistent with the Federal Way ColTrnonity Plan which
designates the property Single Family, four to nine homes per acre. The
Area Zoning i s ~
The Sensitive Areas Map Folio indicates Lower Puget Sound wet'and number
27 .. Wetland Rating I (Unique/Outstanding) is located within portions
of toe proposed plat, The prOposed 100 foot buffer is consistent Idth
Kir" Coonty Comprehensive Plan policy E-329,
Cl: ;W: f j
]3:,:",/004
cco
Lois Schwennesen, 11anager, Planning and ColTrnunity Development Division
An/I: Paul Wozniak, Community Planner
~"ekPoon, Chief, Resource Planning
~: Erik Stockdale, Resource Planner
ATTACHMENT,2.
II~ }
'"..,..""" "" "I""
.. CONDITIONS OF PERMIT/AFREÇ9~:l"iF.D
P'~~~:: ,~~r~~9POO16 TYPE: PRE-PLAT GCl ì. 4 1~ò9
DATE: 10/24/89
PAGE: 1
FIRE CDNa I TI DNS
((l¡\'>-fútlcf
SU~UIVI~IV"~
F8CO - P'ellmlne,y F"e Enginee'ing app,ove! h.. been g'Onted baoed
uOon the following Info,met Ion p'ovlded.
To obteln finel Fi'e Englnoe'lng epp'oval the following
Item(.) mu.t be .ubmltted, reviewed end epp'oved:
I.
Ce'tificate of Wete, Availability. (Provided by
appropriete wat., purveyo,). Velld one yeH from date
of 'Ignetu,". Minimum acceptence'flow .hell be 1000
gel Ion. p" minute et 20 pound. po, eqUHe inch
'e'ldual.
II.
Th,ee copie. of pion. indicoting:
A. Fi'e hyd'Ont (.) locot ion - mee.ured by vehicu!H
t'evel di.tonca. (K.C. a,dinonce No. 5828)
Re'ldantiel
1. 700 ft. maximum .pacing.
2, Not mo'e then 350 ft. f'om eech lot.
8, Wetermein plecement (K.C. a'dinance No. 5828)
1. SOu'ce (i.e.) aupply connection.
2. Main .izo. identified.
3. Velv.., fitting., etc.
C. Fi,e acce.. rood. W.F.C. Section 10.207)
1. Minimum 20 ft. "ide, unob.t,ucted - 13'6"
venical clea,ence, unobotructed. AII-"eethH
.udece, eble to "ith.tend 25 ton..
2. Fire ecce.. rood. in exce.. of 150 feet
(deed-end.), muot hove a tu,n-Hound H"".
Required tu,n-Hound. muot be a mInimum 80 foot
diemeter.
3. Fire acce.. road. mu.t p,ovide 20 foot minimum
in.ide tu,ning radiu. and 40 foot out.ide
turning radiu. when uid road. change direction.
4, Fire ecce.. rood. .hall not exceed 15" grade.
5. The required "idth of any fire opparotuo occo..
rood .hell not be ob.tructed in any manner, in-
cluding puking of vehieloo. Minimum required
width. and cleHonee. ootabliohed under th..
.ection ohall be mointeinod ot oIl timeo.
6. When requirod,app'ovod oigno or.othor aoorovod
~oticoo ohell bo provided and maintained for
fire apporotuo occo.. roodo to ¡dent Ify ouch
roodo end prohibit tho obotruction thereof or
both.
F605 -
, "
Finol'pl.at¡ap'proval,roquiroo an,;inapoction ~nd approval of
tho fir;' '¡'ydr',nl .~d "alarr..ln';n.t!)lotion ~y . K.C...BALD
Commercial rlro':inopoctor, prior..:tO<'rooording. Ca!.!..'
296-6615; .fror'o pormit,to' Inotall h.. boon obtoinod"from
8AL:J: Firo P'otoction_E~,~i..nooring."
ATTACHMENT 3
...
(Çt'.. :\
I\,~-..'
~
""'."opPI'11 . 01"""", ""n,ng'ooVfi5CJ.1-fl'-/J . (¿,Jo,¡<;""1XXJ
DEPAI\T¡\1E.'.;T OF ECOLOGY
,¡.", oJ{ 1\ \'HIV;l')~
Hr. Ralph COlby
King County BALD
3600 - l36th Place SE
Bellevue, WA 98006
AtCt/'vtD
OCT 2 J 198
$;;8ü '9
IVlôlUNS
<,)
,"
, , ','1 ¡:;,
ti~ ~ ~;
~~lli ~ ,
."
"
October 17, 1989
Dear Hr. COlby:
Thank you for the opportunity to colllJnent on the detel1nination
of nonsigniticance for the Campus Ridge SUbdivision proPOsed
by Heritage Land Development ('S89POO16). We reviewed the
environmental checklist and have the following comments.
1. We agree with Y"Jur call for strict adherence to the tem-
porary erosion and sedimentation control plan through the en-
tire life of the construction project.
2. The Washington State clean Air Act req1Jires the Use of
all known, available, and reasonable means of controlling air
Pollution, including dust. Dust generated during construc-
tion activities can be controlled by wetting those dust
sources such as areas of expOsed soils, Washing truck wheels
before they leave the site, and installing and maintaining
gravel construction entrances. Construction vehicle
trac):-out is also a major dust source. Any evidence of
track-out can trigger violations and fines from Ecology or
thE local air agency.
If you have any questions on Comment 1, please call Hs.
Ra=hel Friedman-Thomas of the Northwest Regional Office at
(206) 867 -712 8. Ques t ions on Comment 2 should be directed to
Mr. Jay Willenberg of the Northwest Regional Office at (206)
80-7117.
BJR:
Sincerely,
--" ( -""':;ot"¡',
';;;")-1,CH1'~d../,ï" -',.,,':
Barbara J. Iii tchie
Environmental Review Section
cc:
Rachel Fri~dman-Thornas
Jay Willenberg
"
ATTACHMENT 4
~""'-'......,¡r.;:""""- ---;
'.. ,
"'C, '
,C.,",.
¡.
"" ¡¡".Ioong . 8~] S""nJ A." . 5",11" \VA 98JO<.1508
October 16, 1989
5a::-ba::-a Questad
K:n;¡ Cot:nty Buildir.g
a:-.:] Lar.:] Development
J£OO - 136th Place Southeast
5ellevue, WA 98006-1400
L'O
'"'
;:¡;"" g ::¡
'~b ~ [1']
::'~) - (3
'§;': :=:: ~~
~~~ :-c ;:;
::;0 .. ','
,~
.,)
Detennination of Nonsignificanca
file !10. S89POO16 HeritaQe Land Develocmen1;
Dear Ms. Questad:
Metro sta~f has reviewed this prcposal and anticipates no
significant impacts to Met::-o's waste"'ater facilities or
public t::-ansportation services. However, we have the
follo,':ng comments regarding water quality:
This proj ect is near a wetland that is included in King
Cot.:nty's sensitive areas program. In order to minimize
a'¡verse e:lVironmental impacts to this wetland, we recommend
tr.e following protective measures:
Ide:-.tify any tributary, "'atercourse or surface drainage
near the construction site that might enter the wetland
area.
Adhere to measures required in the King County drainage
"a~t.:al for water quality swales. Copies of this
doou"ent are available from King County, Resource
Plonning Division.
King County and the developer should ensure, thrcugh
a t:onitoring program, that the proposed wetland
mitigotion measures are implemented and are adequately
protecting the wetland. One or both of the parties
s~ould be designated responsible for designing and
i!:\ple"'e~ting additional mesures in the event these
prove inadequate.
Thor.): you for the oppcrtunity to revie", and comment.
SI:-.oe::-ely,
/.:;(" "¿"/ /'~¿, "-,i,.,.."
./ :,,- Gre?ory '¡oj. Bush, Manager
Environ!:\e!1tal Planning Divisicn
GXB:jmgJ027
ATTACHMENT
?
FILE S89POOl6
l ,^-" nUi i !ul LA^J DEii.LDPHEHT
PROPOSAl.: 10.45 ^CRES INTO as LOTS
SIR: 18-21-4
~ : : /] ~~~mi~lON
0 I PU D, I
~ L=-J
S'R
S-II
I..
5-11
IIC-3.600-p
.~:,
==~-~-II~-- - -
~B" ./ S'II'
) ~,
~',
S-R
"D.
J"""
p, U, 0,
,~_/- -
'~~D" I
I
0072.150.016
JDW/naa
06/29/90
EXHIBIT "B"
THE FOLLOWINGLpAGES ARE
CERT~l)~ ~~I"S,
B~, ~
TITLE - ,
RESOLUTION NO.
90-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE, KING COUNTY
BUILDING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT FILE NO. S89POOl6
WITH CONDITIONS.
WHEREAS,
the
Hearing
Examiner
for
the
Office
of
the
Zoning
and
Subdivision Examiner
for King
County held
a
public
hearing concerning the preliminary plat of Campus Ridge, and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of said hearing the Office of
the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner for King County, Washington,
issued its Findings, Conclusions, Conditions, Recommendations and
Order, and
WHEREAS,
subsequent to said hearing and said decision,
the City of Federal Way incorporated, said incorporation occuring
prior
to
the
King
County
Council
making
a
decision
on
the
preliminary plat of Campus Ridge,and
WHEREAS, the city Council of the Federal of Federal Way
is the governmental body now having jurisdiction and authority to
pass upon the approval, denial or modification of the conditions
of said preliminary plat, and
WHEREAS,
the
city
Council
determined the
need
for a
public hearing to be held within the corporate limits of the newly
incorporated
city
of
Federal
Way,
and
having
called
for
said
hearing and notice of said hearing having been given, the hearing
having been held on May 17, 1990, and having been continued from
time to time,
and at the conclusion of said hearings,
the City
JDWO0904R
-1-
Copr
council having made its decision and determined that there is a
need to modify the conditions of approval, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section
1.
The
findings,
conclusions
and
recommendations
of
the
Office
of
the
Zoning
and
Subdivision
Examiner for King County, Washington, issued on February 28, 1990,
following a hearing held on January 16,
1990,
which included a
recommendation to approve the preliminary plat of Campus Ridge,
subject to certain conditions, are hereby adopted as the Findings
and
Conclusions
of the
city Council
subj ect to the additional
findings,
modifications and conditions set
forth hereinafter in
this resolution.
Section
2.
The
city
Council
makes
the
following
additional findings and conclusions:
A.
The
SEPA
checklist
filed
in
this
matter
identifies that there are no designated or informal recreational
opportunities in the immediate vicinity of the proposed plat.
The
applicant proposed no measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation
including
the
provision
of
any
recreational
opportunities to be provided by the project.
B.
The Hearing Examiner for King County in the SEPA
appeal
hearing
found that the proposed
density of the
subject
subdivision will be somewhat greater than that of the surrounding
developments.
C.
There is a substantial Type I wetland located on
the site.
Adequate conditions have been imposed to assure the
JDWO0904R
-2-
minimum degradation of the wetland and to discourage intrusions
into the wetland and the attendant buffer zone.
D.
The King County Staff Report confirmed that the
nearest community park is located approximately three-fourths of a
mile south east of the site.
E.
Testimony from residents in the area confirmed
that there are no other recreational facilities in the surrounding
developments.
F.
The record is repleat with testimony and facts
evidencing that there is no recreational or park or usable open
space opportunity in the adj acent surrounding areas nor has the
applicant proposed
any
on
site.
The Type
I wetland area and
attendant buffer zone
into which intrusion should be minimized
will, without the provision of other on-site area and facilities,
become
used
open
space
contrary
to
applicable
policies
and
requirements of the mitigated DNS conditions.
G.
King
County
Code
Chapter
19.38
requires
subdivisions of ten acres or larger in this zone classification to
make provision for common usable open space or to pay a fee to the
Parks Division of the County for establishment and maintenance of
neighborhood parks.
The decision as to whether on-site provision
or other method of providing park, recreation and/or usable open
space oppportunities must rest with the governmental entity having
the approval authority.
The delegation to the applicant of the
right to make the determination as to whether on-site provision or
in lieu of payments should be made would be an improper delegation
of decision-making authority to a private party.
JDWO0904R
-3-
H.
As noted in the Hearing Examiner's Findings and
Conclusions,
and in the testimony before the city Council,
the
zoning in this subdivision is for small lots.
In addition,
lot
averaging has been utilized resulting in a certain number of lots
in the proposed division being smaller than the minimum lot size
for the zone.
While lot averaging is permitted under King County
regulations,
the
attendant
small
size
lots
further
limit
area
available on each lot for recreation and open space uses by the
owners
thereof
and
further
substantiates
the
need
for
some
provision on site for recreation and usable open space area.
1.
Based
upon
the
evidence
in
the
record with
respect
to
expected
populations
of
children
in
single-family
residential
subdivisions
of
this
nature,
there
is
a
need
to
provide
on-site
recreational
and/or
usable
open
space
opportunities,
there being no
other
facility within reasonable
proximity of this site to provide such opportunity for residents
of this
proposed proj ect.
Accordingly,
a condition should be
imposed requiring the redesign to provide for recreation and/or
usable
open
space
in
that
portion
of
the
preliminary
plat
designated as proposed lots 23 and 24.
This area is approximately
one-third of an acre and will provide realistically usable space
for the residents of the proposed development.
In addition,
a
condition should be imposed requiring the installation of a play
structure for use of the residents of this proposed development on
the
area
to
be
provided
for
recreational
and/or
usable
open
space.
The nature of said play structure and its location to be
subject to the approval by the City staff.
JDWO0904R
-4-
J.
The
recommendations
of
the
city
staff
for
additions and modifications of the Hearing Examiner's report and
recommendations relating to establishment of interpretative signs
for
the
NGPE
area
and
amending
Condition
17
of
the
Hearing
Examiner's Report and Recommendation requiring maintenance of the
private
portions
of
the
drainage
system
should
be
added
as
additional conditions to the approval of the preliminary plat.
K.
The applicant has proposed installation of a
sidewalk on only one side of the street.
While the King county
road standards will permit sidewalks on one side, said standards
are guidelines which are designed to encourage standardization but
are not intended to prevent flexibility of the county or the city
in carrying out the duty
imposed by RCW Chapter 58.17 and the
general
duty
to
provide
adequate streets,
sidewalks
and
other
public 'Ways.
The city Council finds that it is in the public
interest and safety that sidewalks be provided on both sides of
the roadway.
Children and other pedestrians will be drawn to the
recreation/usable open space area at the north end of the plat,
and a sidewalk on both sides will provide safety
in accessing
those
facilities.
In
addition,
all
school
children
or
other
pedestrians
wishing
to
exit
the
plat
to
walk
to
schools
or
elsewhere must exit only through the entry way.
The additional
safety provided by a sidewalk on both sides of the street warrants
the requirement of the additional sidewalk.
section
3.
Based upon the Findings,
Conclusions and
Recommendations
of
the
Office
of
the
Zoning
and
Subdivision
Examiner, and based upon the report from the King county staff and
JDWO0904R
-5-
the report from the city of Federal Way staff and the Findings and
Conclusions
of
the
city
Council
set
forth
hereinabove,
the
preliminary plat of Campus Ridge,
Building and Land Development
File No.
S89POOl6
is
hereby approved
subj ect to the Findings,
Conclusions, Recommendations and Conditions of the Office of the
Zoning and Subdivision Examiner for King County, Washington, dated
February 28, 1990, and the recommended conditions by the King
County staff incorporated within said Examiner's report and
subject further to the modification of those conditions as
determined by the city of Federal Way to be in the interests of
the public health, safety and general welfare as follows:
A.
A new condition requiring identification of the
native
growth
protection
easement
shall
be
added
to
read
as
follows:
To insure that citizens understand the
importance of an NGPE area, an interpretive sign
shall be posted along the edge of the NGPE area
(S. W. 323rd street) describing the importance
of the area and listing prohibited activities,
i.e., no cutting of any vegetation, no dumping,
etc. Exact language, sign design and
construction shall be decided upon by the city
of Federal Way staff and applicants prior to
recording the final plat.
B.
Condition #17 of the Hearing Examiner's Report
and Recommendations should be modified to read as follows:
The homeowners association and/or property
owners of Campus Ridge shall have an ongoing
obligation to maintain the private portion of
the drainage system and open space. The city is
hereby granted a license to come upon the
premises to perform such maintenance in the
event that the Campus Ridge homeowners
association and/or property owners do not
properly maintain the drainage system or open
space. In the event that the City is required
to perform such maintenance work, after notice
JDWO0904R
-6-
to the Campus Ridge homeowners association or
property owners, and the failure of the Campus
Ridge homeowners association and/or property
owners to perform the required work, the city
may perform said work and shall charge back to
Campus Ridge homeowners association and/or
property owners the cost of performing said work
times a multiplier of two. Campus Ridge
homeowners association and/or property owners
shall pay wi thin thirty (30) days the amounts
invoiced by the City for performing such
required maintenance work. If Campus Ridge
homeowners association and/or property owners
fail to pay, the City is authorized to place a
lien on the lots included in the plat.
C.
In
order
to
provide
on-site
provision
for
recreation and usable open space in light of the small size of the
lots,
the need to discourage intrusions into the Type I wetland
and
the
absence of any
other recreation
or usable
open
space
facil i ties
for
the
residents
of
the
proposed
plat,
the
area
designated as proposed lots 23 and 24
shall be set aside as a
recreation and/or usable open space area for the residents of the
proposed
subdivision.
In
addition,
a
play structure shall be
located on the recreation/usable open space area of a type and in
a location to be agreed upon by the staff of the City of Federal
Way and the applicant prior to recording of the final plat.
said
common recreation/usable open space shall be owned by the Campus
Ridge homeowners association,
if the same is formed,
or by the
owners of the lots of the proposed plat and shall be maintained
for recreation and usable open space uses for the future residents
of said proposed plat.
King County staff recommendation number
J(2) is modified to conform with this condition.
D.
sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the
street
in
conformance
with
the
city
Council's
finding
and
JDWO0904R
-7-
conclusion and in the interests of public safety.
Section
4.
The
conditions
of
approval
of
the
preliminary plat are all integral to each other with respect to
the City Council finding that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting or subdivision of the subj ect property.
Should
any
court
having
jurisdiction
over
the
subject
matter
declare any of the conditions invalid,
then,
in said event,
the
proposed
preliminary
plat
approval
granted
in
this
resolution
shall be deemed void,
and the preliminary plat shall be remanded
to the Hearing Examiner for the City of Federal Way to review the
impacts
of the invalidation of any condition or conditions and
conduct such additional proceedings as are necessary to assure
that the proposed plat makes appropriate provisions for the public
health,
safety and general welfare and other factors as required
by RCW Chapter 58.17 and applicable County and/or city ordinances,
rules and regulations and forward such recommendation to the City
Council for further action.
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way
this l7th day of July, 1990.
APPMV," , ~
¡¿ç~
, YOR, DEBRA ERTEL
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: June 29, 1990
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: July 17, 1990
RESOLUTION NO. 90-37
JDWO0904R
-8-