Res 91-082
RESOLUTION NO.
91-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE
FINAL PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE, DESIGNATED AS KING
COUNTY BUILDING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT FILE
NO. S89POO16.
WHEREAS,
the
preliminary
plat
for
Campus
Ridge,
designated Building and Land Development File No. S89POO16, was
approved subject to conditions on July 17, 1990, by Federal Way
City Ordinance No. 90-37; and
WHEREAS,
the applicant submitted the application for
final
plat
for
Campus
Ridge within
three
years
of
receiving
approval for the above-referenced preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, city of Federal Way Community Development staff,
having reviewed the proposed final plat for its conformance to the
conditions (modified) of the preliminary plat; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
section 1.
Findinqs of Fact.
The Federal Way city
Council makes the following Findings of Fact:
1.
The final plat for Campus Ridge, Building and Land
Development File No.
S89POO16,
is in substantial
conformance
to
the
preliminary plat
and
is
in
conformance with applicable zoning ordinances or
other land use controls in effect at the time of
submittal
of
the
substantially
complete
application.
COpy
2.
All
conditions
recommended
by
the
Zoning
and
Subdivision
Hearing
Examiner
for
King
County,
Washington, contained in report and recommendation
to King County Council dated February 28, 1990, and
additional conditions imposed by the Federal Way
city Council pursuant to Ordinance 90-37, have been
satisfied,
and/or satisfaction of the conditions
have been sufficiently guaranteed by the applicant.
3.
Ninety percent of all required improvements have
been made and sufficient bond has been accepted by
King County as financial guaranty for completion of
all required plat improvements.
4.
All taxes and assessments owing on the property
being subdivided have been paid.
section 2.
Approval. . Based upon the above Findings of
Fact, the final plat of Campus Ridge, Building and Land Development
File No. S89POO16, is approved, subject to satisfaction of those
conditions
as
contained
in the Report of
Subdivision Hearing
Examiner dated February 28, 1990, attached hereto as Exhibit A and
Federal Way Ordinance 90-37,
attached hereto as Exhibit Band
incorporated by reference.
section 3.
Recordinq.
The approved and signed final
plat, together with all legal instruments pertaining thereto as
required pursuant to all applicable codes, shall be recorded by the
applicant in the King County Department of Elections and Records.
All recording fees shall be paid by the applicant.
-2-
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, this ~ day of
October
, 1991.
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
i1r~~L !Sw
OR, DEBRA ERTEL
M. SWANEY, CMC
~F~'
",TYATTORN~~
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-82
October 9, 1991
October 15, 1991
LA\EF\RES\91-0208.CAL
-3-
EXHIBIT "A"
febrUHY 28, 1990
ornCE or TI1E ZONING ^ND SUBDIVISION EXAMINER
KING COUNTY, WASHIIJGTON
REPORT ^ND RECOMMEND^TION TO THE KING COUNTY COUNCIL.
SUBJECT:
--
Building and Land Development File No. S89pOOl6
proposed Ordinance No. 89-811
",oposed Plat of CAMPUS RIDGE
10.45 acres generally lying between S.E. 35th and
36th place (if both roads were extended) and
generally between 212th Avenue S.E. and 216th
Avenue S.E. (if extended).
SUMMARY Of RECOMMENDATIONS:
Division's preliminary:
^pprove subject
(modified)
Approve subject
(modified)
Approve subject
(modified)
to conditions
Division's Pinal:
to conditions
Examiner:
to conditions
PRELIMINARY REPORT:
The Building and Land oevelopment Division's preliminary
Report on Item No. S89pOO16 was received by the Examiner
on January 2, 1990.
PUBLIC HEARING:
After reviewing the Building and Land Development
Division's Report, examining available information on file
with the application and visiting the property and
surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing
on the subject as follows:
The hearing on Item No. s89pOO16 was opened by the Examiner at
9:28 a.m., on January 16, 1990, in Building and Land
Development Division in Hearing Room No.1, 3600 - l36th place
S.E., Suite A, Bellevue, Washington, and closed at 11:45 a.m.
participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and
entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim
recording of the hearing is available in the office of the
zoning and Subdivision Examiner.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS. RECO"MENDATION: "aving reviewed the
record in this matter, the Examiner noW makes and enters the
following:
file No. s89pOO16
pa g e 2
~~:
1.
General Information:
STR:
Location:
18 -21- 4
Generally between S.E. 35th and
36th Place (if both roads were
extended) and generally between
212th Avenue S.E. and 216th
Avenue S.E, (if extended)
SR7,200
10.45
25
Ranges from 6,500 to 8,000
square feet
Detached single-family
residences
federal Way Water and Sewer
D i s t r i c t
federal Way Water and Sewer
D i s t r i c t
39 - federal Way
1210 - Federal way
Zon i ng :
Acreage:
Number of Lots:
Typical Lot Size: .
proposed Use:
Sewage Disposal:
Water supply:
fire District:
School oistrict:
2.
This is a request for preliminary approval of a
subdivision of 10.45 acres into 24 lots in the West campus
Master Plan area of federal Way. proposed lot sizes range
from 6,500 to 8,000 square feet which the Building and
planning Divisions report is consistent with the community
plan which deoignates the property single family, four to
nine units per acee, and the area zoning of SR. Sewer and
water wiIl be furnished by the federal way Water and Sewer
District which has issued certificates of sewer and water
availability for the project. It is proposed to serve the
subdivision with a cul-de-sac, 7th Avenue S.w., off S.W.
323rd Street. The site includes approximately half of the
lower puget Sound wetland No. 27 and approximatelY 40% of
the site will be set aside for the wetland and its buffer
(215,520 square feetl. The plat avails itseI! of the
recently adopted ordinance which allows the inclusion of
interior streets in the lot area. Using lot averaging,
the applicant's engineers estimate that 14% of the derived
lot areas are in the street which is below the 35% allowed
by the county.
3.
The subject property is surrounded by single family homes
in the developments of West Campus Divisions I and 3. Lot
sizes in earlier divisions are typically 9,600 square
feet. Area residents have suggested that development at
7,200 square foot densities are incompatible with the
existing character of the neighborhood and the lot sizes
should be increased.
4.
AS noted above, a Type I wetland is located on this site.
The County required a wetland study which its experts have
reviewed and approved. On the basis of the study, the
Division has required a 100 foot buffer around the
boundaries of the wetland and a 15 foot building setback
line from the buffer which will be placed in a Native
Growth Protection Easement. Because of the presence of
this wetland, interested neighbors have argued that the
site in question should not be developed. Federal Way, it
is argued, does not have adequate open space and parks and
any further development of open space areas should not
occur. Current residents enjoy the presence of the
undeveloped wetland and trees as an amenity to their
neighborhood.
File 1'0. S89POO16
page 3
5.
As amended, the Subdivision Technical committee's
recommended co"dition 9. a., would require the use of
swales and/or open ponds for water quality enhancement
prior to discharge of flows to the on-site wetland. The
applicant has requested that alternative technologies be
permitted If it can be demonstrated that similar water
quality enhancement can be achieved by other means. The
Cou"ty's engineers have indicated that they are willing to
consider alternative methods of assuring water quality
during the review of engineering plans.
6.
The subdivision Technical Committee has recommended that a
grading plan be prepared prior to the construction of
roads in order to minimize erosion and assure that
sediment laid in water does impact the wetland. In
addition, an erosion control inspector would be retained
by the applicant to provide recommendations during
implementation of the grading plan and submit weekly
reports to the King county Development Inspection Unit.
7.
Neighboring residents have requested that there be
sidewalks on both sides of 7th Avenue S.W.. the street
which is intended to provide access to lots in the
proposed development. The Subdivision Technical Committee
has recommended that sidewalks only be placed on one side
of the street pursuant to the King county Road standards,
(Section 3,021. The applicant has requested that this
walkway be on the west side of the street away from the
wetland.
8.
In addition to the NGPE and building setback line,
separating wetland No. 27 from the proposed homesites, the
subdivision Technical Committee recommends that a fence be
extended along the entire rear lot lines of lots 14
through 22. Interested neighbors have inquired what kind
of a fence will be built to which the Subdivision
Technical committee responds, the county has no strict
standard. The applicant's representatives have stated
that a cedar fence will be placed along that property 1 ine.
9.
^ grass lined swale will be run along the eastern boundary
of the plat to capture surface water heading toward the
wetlands. The Subdivision Technical Committee has stated
that this should be outside the backyard of future homes.
Residents who are unfomilia< with the purpose of the ditch
often ottempt to fill it and disrupt its function.
current residents have inquired who will maintain the
drainage system, stating that a home owner's association
should be estoblished for this purpose. The Subdivision
Technical committee has responded that maintenance of the
drainage system will be the responsibility of the county
when the plat is finally approved.
1O.
The Federal way School District, like school districts in
rapidly growing neighborhoods throughout the state, is
experiencing an increase in student population. Three
schools would serve the proposed subdivision--Silver Lake
Elementary school, Illahee Junior High School, and Federal
way High School. At the present time, the District
reports that both Illahee and Federal Way have adequate
space for additional students. Silver Lake students are
presently housed in temporary facilities until the new
silver Lake Elementary School is open in the fall of
1990. At that time, it is anticipated that the Elementary
School will be at capacity and new students may have to be
bussed to another location, or other measures taken to
alleviate overcrowding.
rile No. s69POO16
pa ge 4
11.
Except as "oted above, the facts, analysis and
recommendation presented in the Building and Land
Oevelopment oivision's Preliminary Report dated January
16, 1990 are uncontested and they are incorporated here by
reference. ^ copy of the Building and Land oevelopment
Division's report will be attached to the copies of the
Examiner's report which are submitted to the King County
Council.
CONCLUSIONS:
1.
The proposed lot sizes will be somewhat smaller than other
lots in the vicinity of Campus Ridge, however, they are in
compliance with the community plan and area zoning which
are the standards by which lot area is usually judged. In
the absence of severe topographical or other constraints,
the applicant is ordinarily entitled to develop property
in compliance with the applicable zoning and plan
standards. This provides a rational and consistent
standard on which the public and industry can rely. In
this instance, it is my conclusion that there is
insufficient basis to require larger lot sizes of this
applicant.
2.
While neighboring residents have enjoyed the view over the
wetland and vacant area encompassed by the proposed plat,
there is no basis in law to require it to remain open
space. Significant portions of the property have been
left undeveloped as noted in the rindings above,
(approximately 40\), and to requi,re dedication of the
entire property for park purposes would be an unlawful
taking of the applicant's property. There is nO right to
a view across another persons property in .the absence of
an easement or other ownership interest for that purpose.
unfortunately, the amenity of the view toward an
undeveloped property will be lost in part. However, a
significant undeveloped area encompassing the wetland will
remain for present and future residents to enjoy.
^" concluded in the decision on the threshold
determination appeal on the same applicantion, it is my
conclusion that the 100 foot buffer and 15 foot building
set back line recommended by the Subdivision Technical
committee will adequately protect the wetlands in
question. In addition, the applicant will be required to
u.tilize open grass lined swales and settling ponds or
equivalent systems to enhance water quality before release
into the wetland. The applicant's testimony is that there
will be at least 600 fee,t of grass lined swales in excess
of the county minimum standard of 200 feet.
3.
It is my conclusion that the seasonal grading and
temporary erosion sedimentation control plan, as
recommended by the subdivision Technical Committee, is
reasonable, and the conditions will be adopted below.
These conditions are now a part of the mitigated
determination of non-significance in this matter as well.
In view of the Class I wetland present on this site, great
care should be taken to assure that erosion and
sedimentation are controlled during development phases of
the project.
4.
The Subdivision Technical committee's recommendation that
sidewalks be required on only one side of 7th Avenue S.W.
is in conformity to the King County Road Standards adopted
file No. s89pOO16
Page S
by Ordinance 8041. Secio" 3.02 provides that subdivisions
of less than 3S lots are not required to have sidewalks on
both sides. In50far as, the standard is set by an
ordinance adopted by the legislative authority, the
Subdivision Technical committee's recommendation, in this
respect, appears correct. Therefore, the conditions
below, will not be modified to require sidewalks on both
sides of proposed 7th Avenue S.W.
5.
While the School District may have erred in its
determination that the subject property should be sold, it
is beyond the authority of the Examiner to reverse that
decision or cancel the sale. While there may be a need
for added open space in the Federal Way community, this
applicant has complied with County law and contributed a
significant portion of its property as open space. while
it might enhance the view of neighboring property owners
if the Examiner declared the site a park, this would
probably constitute an unlawful taking of private property
for a public purpose, and the Examiner is not authorized
to seize the property or to condemn it for public purposes
in this proceeding.
6.
Insofar as, the applicant has agreed to put in a cedar
fence along the entire eastern boundary of the plat, in
response to the neighbor's concerns, the conditions below
shall be amended to note this fact.
7,
If approved subject to the conditions recommended below,
the proposed subdivision will comply with the goals and
objectives of the Comprehensive plan, Federal way
Community plan, subdivision and zoning Codes, and other
official land use controls and policies of King county.
8.
If approved subject to the conditions recommended below,
this proposed subdivision will make appropriate provision
for the public health, safety and general welfare and for
drainage ways, streets, other public ways, water supply,
and sanitary wastes; and it will 5erve the public use and
interest.
9.
The conditions recommended in the Division of Building and
Land Development's preliminary Report as amended below are
in the public interest and are reasonable requirements.
RECOMMENDATIO~:
Grant preliminary approval to the plat of CAMPUS RIDGE as
revised and received by the Building and Land Development
Division, October 10, 1989, subject to the conditions set forth
on pages 7 through 13 of the report of the Building and Land
Development Division for the January 16, 1990 public hearing
with the following amendments:
9 (al As shown on the preliminary plat dated October 10, 1989, a
storm water retention/detention area is proposed adjacent
to lot 23. This drainage facility shall be designed to
achieve water quality enhancemen t use of vegetated swales,
and on open ponds subject to review of the applicant's
engineering plans prior to discharge of flowe to the
on-site wetland, The subdivision Technical committee may
consider alternate methods of assuring adequate water
quality. since the subject proprty is not located in a
designated King County critical drainage basin, the storm
water facility shall be designed at minimum using the
10-year design storm.
20.
The fence referred to in 191bl above shall be a 6 foot
cede r fence, the design and location of which are subject
to approval by the Subdivision Technical Committee.
File No. s69POO16
page 6
ORDERED this 28th day of February, 1990.
&~~
Deputy zoning and Subdivision
Examiner
TRANSMITTEO this 28th day of February, 1990 by certified mail
to the following parties of record:
Marti n Quehrn, Attorney
Don/Rosemary Bitterman
Ronald A. Cowan
C.W.DI/earbara Gard,,'"
Eileen Stauss
C. Douglas Hinkley
Julie Klouse
Heritage Land Dev.
J. Lavillette
Eugene J. Haldas
Jerian , Dale Peterson
Dae Ann Poston
Mar k Eide
Robert Gerard Lut.
pau 1 Booth
Graecean ConsL!s.' Kerrith finch
D.I.R.E./R. Burris
Thaddeus J. Kled.i k
CWWPC!R. curtis
Michael Ewing
Mark 8est
Pac-Tech Engineering, Inc.
West campus III HOA
victoria How
Eileen Stauss
1,Iona Morris' Don Van Note
Thomas cross, O.D.O.
pac-Tech/J. D. Mann/B. Harron
Scott Rosenbaum
TRANSMITTED this 26th day of February, 1990 to the following
parties:
!rv Berteig, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Barbara Questad, Rich Hudson,
Pete Dye, Ned Langford, Ralph colby and Brian Shea of Building
and Land Development Division
Pete r Hayes
Wa.St.Dept, Wildlife
Diana Kinared
Gail Bruce
Wa. St. Dept. Ecology
Christopher Brown' Assoc.
Wa. State oept. of Transp.
Fed.Way P.S./R. Hamlin, A.S.
K.C. Conservation District
NeW Construction Services
11'TRO
Shapiro' Assoc.
McConnell/Burke
Wa. Natural Gas
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
In order to appeal the recommend'ation of the Examiner, written
notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the King
County Council with a fee of 470.00 (check payable to King
county Office of Finance) on or before March 14, 1990. If a
notice of appeal is filed, the original and 6 copies of a
written appeal statement specifying the basis for the appeal
and argument in support of the appeal must be filed with the
Clerk of the King county council on or before March 21, 1990.
If a written notice of appeal and filing fee are not filed
within 14 calendar days of the date of this report, or if a
written appeal statement and argument are not filed within 21
calendar days of the date of this report, the Clerk of the
Council shall place a proposed ordinance which implements the
Examiner's recommended action on the agenda of the next
available Council meeting.
Filing requires actual delivery to the Office of the Clerk of
the Council, Room 403, King county courthouse, prior to the
File No. S69pOO16
Page 7
close of busioess (4,30 p.m.) 00 the date due. Prior mail!og
is not sUffideot if actual receipt by the Clerk does not occur
within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have
authority to exteod the time period unless the Office of the
Clerk is not open on the specified closiog date, io which eveot
delivery prior to tho close of busioess on the oext busiooss
day is sufficieot to meet the filiog requiremeot.
Action of the Council Fioal. The actioo of the Council
approviog or adoptiog a recommendatioo of the Examiner shall be
final and conclusive uoless within thrity (30) days from the
date of the action an aggrieved party or person applies for a
writ of certiorari from the superior court in and for the
County of King, State of Washington, for the purpose of review
of the action taken.
MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 16, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING ON BALD FILE NO.
S69pOO16,
Robert E. Beaty was the Hearing Examiner in this matter.
participating io the hearing were Rich Hudson, Pete Dye and
Fereshteh Dehkordi of Buildiog aod Land oevelopment Division,
Kerrith Finch, Bob Curtis, Jeff Mann, Brian Harron, Scott
Rosenbaum, Mark Eide, Robert Curtis and Robert Gerard Lutz.
The following exhibits were offered aod eotered into the record,
Exhibit No. 1
Exhibit No. 2
Exhibi t No. 3
Exhibit No. 4
Exhibit No. 5
Exhibit No. 6
Ex h ib i t No. 7
Exhibit No. 8
Exh i bi t No. 9A
Exhibit No. 9B
Exhibi t No. 10
Exhibit No. 11
Exhibit No. 12
Exhibit No. 13
Exhibit No. 14
Exhibit No. IS
Exhibit No. 16
4570D/REB/sm
Buildiog and Land Development Division
staf f report, dated 1/16/90
Applicatioo, dated 3/21/69
Environmental Checklist, dated 3/21/89
"itigated Declaration of Non-significance
dated, 10/3/69
Affidavit of posting indicating 12/7/69 as
the date of posting
Revised plat, dated 10/10/89
Limited traosporatioo study by Christopher
Brown & Assoc., dated 5/2/69
Wetland studY by Shapiro & Associates,
dated 5/12/69
Assessor's map NW 16-21-4
Assessor's map NE 16-21-4
Letter from Thomas Cross, dated 10/23/69
Letter from campus Woods wetlands
preservation Committee, dated 11/1/89
Letter from Jeri & Dale Peterson, dated
11/12/89
Letter from Mona Morris & Don Van Note
dated,ll/22/69
Letter from Eileen stauss, dated 11/14/69
Replacement for condition no. 9. a.
conceptual storm drainage plan
PAR1Œ, PLJù"':"~ AND RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
BUILDING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION EXAKINER
JANUARY 16, 1990 - PUBLIC HEMING AT 9:15 A.M. IN ROOM I
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FILE NO:
PROPOSED
ORDINANCE NO.:
S89POO16
89-811
A.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION:
This is a request for a subdivision of 10.45 acres into
24 lots for detached single-family dwellings. The typical
lot size ranges from 6,500 to 8,000 square feet. See
Attachment 1 for copy of proposed plat.
B.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Owner:
Greacen Construction, Inc.
1160 - 140th Ave. N.E., suite E
Bellevue, WA 98005
Engineer:
Pac-Tech Engineering, Inc.
2601 S. 35th st., suite 200
Tacoma, WA 98409
Phone: 473-4491
Developer:
Heritage Land Development
10317 - 122nd St. E.
Puyallup, WA 98373
Phone: 848-1987
STR:
18-21-4
Location:
Generally between Southeast 35th and
36th Place (if both roads were extended)
and generally between 2l2th Avenue
Southeast and 2I6th Avenue Southeast
(if extended)
Zoning:
Acreage:
Number of Lots:
Typical Lot Size:
Proposed Use:
Sewage Disposal:
Water Supply:
Fire District:
School District:
SR 7,200
10.45
25
Ranges from 6,500 to 8.000 square feet
Detached single-family residences
Federal Way Water and Sewer District
Federal Way Water and Sewer District
139 - Federal Way
2I 0 - Federal Way
C.
HISTORY IBACKGROUND:
The Subdivision Technical Committee of King County has
conducted an on-site examination of the subj ect property and
has discussed the propoc=d development with the applicant to
clarify technical details of the application and to deter-
mine the compatibility of this project with applicable King
County plans and codes and other official documents regul"t-
ing this development.
As a result of preliminary discussions, the applicant
presented the Technical CollUl1ittee with a revised plat on
October 10, 1989, The primary modification includes leaving
the wetland and 100-foot buffer in a separate tract. The
applicant also changed the orientation of lots 1, 2, 23, and
24. As a result of this change, these lots would have
direct access to Southwest 323rd Street.
� •
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAHPUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89P0016
� �� .• � � ; • • -�il
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (S�PA),
RCw 43.21C, the responsible official of the Building and
Land Development Division (BALD) issued a mitiqated thres-
hold determination of non-siqnificance (MDNS) for the pro-
posed development on October 3, 1989. This determination is
based on the review of the environmental checklist and other
pertinent documents, resultinq in the conclusion that the
proposal would not cause probable significant adversa im-
pacts on the environment provided the following measures are
complied with:
1. A 100-foot buffer shall be placed around wetland #3327,
with an additional 15'-foot BSHL beyond the butfer. The
wetland and the buffer shall have an NGPE placed upon
them and shall be placed in a separate tract.
2. To protect the function of the NGPE around the wetland,
a fence shall be constructed alonq the eastern.rear lot
lines of lots 14 throuqh 22. Fence detail shall be
submitted to and approved by the King County B]�LD Sub-
division Products Section at the time of Road Plan and
Profile/Drainaqe Review.
NOTE: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC)
Plan Guidelines are to be strictly adhered to durinq the
entire period of project development due to the ESC ratinq
on the site of 16 ES (which reflects moderate site topo-
graphy, relatively small lot size, hiqh lot density, and
on-site wetland area).
Aqencies, affected tribes and the public were offered the
opportunfty to comment on or appeal the determination for
fifteen days. After the close of the comment/appeal period,
any comments askinq for a reconsideration of the threshold
determination were reviewed and considered.
The mitigated determination of non-significance was
appealed, and the SEPA hearinq was conducted on November 16,
1989. No decision on SEPA has been made at this time. This
report will be modified to reflect the Examiner's decision
on the SEPA appeal at the hearinq date.
�L��[`,L�F����Z•3` : � �
1. Kinq County Natural Resources & Parks Division
"Parks Division has no interest in dedication o! this
open space to King County."
2. Kinq County Planninq & Community Development Division:
See Attachment 2. �
3. King County Fire Protection Enqineer:
See Attachment 3.
4. Seattle-King County Health Degartment:
The comments from the Health Department have been
incorporated into this report.
5. Federal Way School District �210:
"The proposed subdivision will affect Silver Lake
Elementary School, Illahee Junior Hiqh School, and
. . �
PR•�POSED PLAT OP CAuFUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89P0016
Federal way High School. At the present time,_both
Illahee and Federal Way have adequate space.for addi-
tional students. Silver Lake students are presently
housed in temporary facilities until the new Silver
Lake Elementary School is opened in the fall of 1990.
Therefore, at the time of openinq, Sflver Lake Elemen-
tary will be at capacity. Federal Way School District
would also like the followinq to be addrecsed:
1. Safe walkway for children; widened shoulder
is not adequate.
2. Crossing lights.
3. Turn-off area €or school bus loading and
unloadinq."
6. Federal Way Sewer District:
"Sewer service will require an improvement to tha sewer
system by construction of a collection system on the
site."
7. Federal way Water District:
"Water service will reqvire an improvement to the water
system by construction of a distribution system on the
site."
8. Washinqton State Department of Ecoloqy:
See Attachment 4.
9. Washington State Department of Fisheries: No response.
10. Washington State Depar:ment of Natural Resources:
No response.
11. Washington State Department of Wildlife:
The Department of Wildlife supports the protection
measures placed on the existinq wetland.
12. Washington State Department of Transportation:
washinqton State Department of Transportation reviewed
the proposed plat and concluded that the traffic gen-
erated by this development will not hav_ a sfgniffcant
adverse impact upon any state hiqhways.
13. Kinq County Conservation District:
"The Kinq County Conservati�n District rscoma�ends the
followinq development actions:
1. Minimize vegetative removal and disturbance.
2. Install Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control
facilities per plan prior to commencinq mass
clearing and qradinq operations.
3. Where possible, avofd �oil disturbance during
rainy season.
4. Install streets, utilities, and storm drains prior
to construction of buildings.
5. Avoid dumping soil, veqetative waste, or debris
over steep slopes.
3
� •
I=i.;i:'JS"D PLF,T OF CAN,PUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89P0016
6• Denuded ground cover should be protected within
15 days of final disturbance of a particular area.
7. Seedinq, mulchinq, nettinq and mechanical forms of
protection can be used to stabilize exposed soils.
e• All stockpiles of excavated soil or fill material
should have erosion protection at all times.
9• Connect all roof drains to existfnq or future
storm system.
10. Design and management of sub-surface drainaqe
system should be planner prior to construction and
implemented accordinq to that pinn. Al1 water
should be conveyed to a safe, non-erosive outlet.
11. Al1 road desiqns should use available soils
information."
14• METRO: See Attachment 5.
: . � ; a ,�,.
�
1• Topography: The site fs qerrtly rolling and slopes from
west to east. A large depression covers approximately
the east one-third of the site. This depression con-
tains the wetland describec3 in Section F.3. of this
report. The steepest area occurs around the edqe of
the depression, with the average slope of 15 to
25 percent. .
2. Soils: Two surface soils are found on this site per
Kinq County Soil Survey, 1973.
a. The west two-thirds of the site is classified AqC.
Bg� - Alderwood qravely, sandy loam, 6-15t slopes.
Runoff is slow to medium and the hazard of erosion
is moderate. This soil has a moderate limitation
for foundations, due to a saasonally high water
table and slope. It has a severe limitation for
septia tank filter fields due to very slow perme-
ability in the substratum.
b. Approximately the east one-third or tha site is
classilied Sk.
�- Seattle Muck, with lsss than 1! �lope.
Runoff ponds and there is little or no arosion.
This soil has severe limitationa !or building
foundations and�septic tank filter tields due to
high water table and organic content. Thit is a
class II soil and is used for seeded qrass,
pasture, hay, blueberries and truck crops.
3. liydroqraphy: Part of a lower Puqet Sound wetland,
Nc• 27, Type 1, is located on this site. � wetland
study was prepared by Shapiro and Associates on May 12,
1989. The Kinq County wetland specialist reviewed the
wetland study and recommended the watland with a
100-foot buffer around it be placed in a Native Growth
Protection Easement tract. See Condition 9.b. for
details.
4
.
�'etV "t'uS F.0
FI1.E NO.
4.
PLAT OF CAN,rv5 kIL�;E
S89P0016
�
The site lies within the Lower Puqet Sound sub-basin of
the Puqet Sound drainaqe basin. :
Vegetation: This site is heavily wooded with a second
and third-grcwth mixture of coniferous and broad-leafed
trees native to the Pacific Northwest.
The wetland vegetation consists of hardhack, wild
crabapple, salmonberry, and slough sedge.
5. Wildlife: Small birds and animals undoubtedly iMabit
this site; however, their population and species are
limited due to nearby development. No special or
endangered species are known to exist on or near the
property.
G.
H
The proposed lot and street layout is in conformance
with KCC Title 21, Zoning, and KCC Tftle 14, Road
Standards.
�: ••; •
6. Mapped Sensitive Areas: The Sensitive Areas Map Folio
indicates on Map No. 6 that the east portion of the
subject property is within Class III Seiemic Hazard
Areas. The east one-third of the subject property are
designated wetlands.
1►1����IZ��� � � � , : : T������t1i���
The property lies within an already developed West Campus
neiqhborhood. The surrounding high-density urban land use
is sinqle-famfly residential. The site is bounded on the
north by S.W. 323rd St., on the west by developed lots, and
on the east and south by open space tracts dedicated.to Kirnq
County.
The site itself is. undeveloped.
GENERAL DESIGN•
i. Internal Circulation:
will be constructed to
qutter, and sidewalks.
tends from S.W. 323rd
cul-de-sac.
The internal roadway section
urban road standards with curb,
Seventh Avenue Southwest ex-
St. southward and terminates in a
2. Lot Pattern: The applicant is usinq KCC 21.20.05o and
KCC 21.08 to meet the minimum lot area rsquirements.
The applicant is proposing to use the make-ug lot area
credited from the internal roadway.
1. Traffic Generation: It is Qxpectad that approximately
240 vehicle trips per day will be generated yith lull
development of the proposed division. This calculation
inc2udes :ervice vehicles (i.e. mail delivery, qarbage
pick-up, school bus) which may currently serve this
neighborhood, work trips, shoppinq, etc.
2. Subdivision Access: The subject plat is bounded by
S.W. 323rd St. on the north and obtains access to S.W.
32oth St. via 6th l�venue Southwest. '
3. Adequacy of Arterial Roads: This proposal has been
reviewed under both SEPA and the criteria in King
County Ordinances 7544 and 8052, Adequacy of Existinq
�
PnOPGSED
FILE NO.
�
K .
4.
Fi:,I OF L�:'.ri;5 RIGGE
S89P0016
�
Roadways and Intersections. A P.M. peak distribution
traffic analysis between the site and Interstate 5
along S. 32oth St. was prepared by Christopher Bzown
and Associates. The Kinq County Traffic Enqineer
reviewed this study and concluded that the subject plat
has no siqnificant effect on the above mentioned road.
The existinq arterial system will accommodate the
increased traffic volume qenerated by this proposal.
Transportation Plans: The Itirrq County Interim
Transportation Plan indicates that S.W. 320th St. fs
designated as a major arterial.
The subject subdivision is not in conflict with this
plan.
PUBLIC SERVI�FC;
1. Schools: �The subject subdivision will be served by
Silver Lake Elementary, �llahee Junior High, and
Federal Way Senior Hiqh Schools. See Section E-5 of
this report for comments received from the school
district.
2. Parks and Open Space: The nearest community park is
Alderbrook Park, located approximately 3/4 mfle south-
east of•the site.
KCC 19.38 requires subdivisions of ten acres or larger
in this zone classification to either provide on-site
common open space or to pay a fee to the Parks Division
for establishment and maintenance of neighborhood
parks.
The applicant�s desiqn provides no suitable open space
area and, therefore, paymenb of a fee will be required
as a condition of approval.
3. Fire Protection: The Certificate of Water Availability
from Federal Way Water and Sewer District indicates
that water is presently available to the site fn
sufficient quantfty to satfsfy Kinq County Fire Flow
Standards.
Prior to final recording of the plat, the water service
facilities must be either in place or bonded to meet
Kinq County Fire Flow Standards.
UT?LITTES•
1. Sewage Dfsposal: ?'he applicant proposes to aerve the
subject subdivision by means o! a public sawer system
manaqed by the Federal Way Water and Sewer Dfstrict.
A Certificate of Sewer Avaflability, dated November 9,
1988, indicates this sewer district�s capabilfty to
serve the proposed development.
'1'he Health Department has recommended preliminary
approval of this proposed method of sewaqe disposal,
and the Buildinq and Land Development Division concurs
with this recoaunendation.
z. water Supply: The applicant proposes to aerve the
subject subdivision with a public water supply and
•
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FILE NO. S89P0016
�
distribution system managed by the Federal Way.Water
and Sewer District.
A Certificate of Water Availability, dated November 9,
1988, indicates this district's capability to serve the
proposed development.
The Health Department has recommended preliminary
approval of this proposed method ot water supply, and
the Bufldinq and Land Development Division concurs with
the Health Department's recommendation. •
• Y ' r � • [�rl
1. Comprehensive Plan:
This proposal is qoverned by the 1985 Kinq County
Comprehensive Plan which desiqnates thia area as Urban.
The proposed subdivision is not in conflict with the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Community Plans:
The subject subdivision is located in the Federal Way
Community Planninq Area which desiqnates the property
Single-Family with a density of 4 to 9 homes per acre.
The Area Zoning is SR-7200. See Attachment 2 for
comments.
The subject subdivision is not in conflict with the
qoals, quidelines, and policfes of the Federal Way
Community Plan.
..
If apprcved with the recommended conditions in this report,
the proposed development will comply with the zequirements
of the County and State Plattinq Codes and Statutes, and the
lots in the proposed subdivision will comply with the mini-
mum dimensional requirements of the zone district.
N. ANALYSIS•
The Subdivision Technical Committee has not identitied any
significant issues involved in the prelfminary review and
recommendations of this proposal.
. . ,L�3�ii��•7:F�
The subject subdivision will comply with the qoals and
objectives of the Kinq County Comprehensiv4 Plan and will
comply with the requiren!snta o! the Subdivision and Zoninq
Codes and other official land use controls o! King County,
based on the conditions for final plat approval.
P .
It is recommended that the subject subdivision, revised and
received October 10, 1989, be qranted preliminary approval
subject to the following conditions of tinal approval:
1. Compliance with all plattinq provisions of Title 19 of
the King County Code.
2. All persons havinq an ownership interest in the subject
property shall siqn on the face of the final plat a
7
•
i nv'r G5 E D �' i.Is';' GF Cr.>: "r :, ;i :.: J,: i:
FILE NO. S89P0016
u
dedication which includes the languaqe set forth in
Kinq County Council Motion No. 5952.
3. The area and dimensions of all lots shall meet the
minimum requirements of the SR 7200 zone classification
or shall be as shown on the face of the approvsd pre-
liminary plat, whichever is larqer. (Minor revisions
may be considered.)
4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King
County Health Department.
5. Al2 construction and upgrading of public and private
roads shall be done in accordance with the Kinq County
Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No.
8041.
6. If an area-wide fire protection assessment is
suthorized by Kinq County prior to tinal recordinq of
this plat, this plat shall be subject to any assessment
provided by that ordinance.
7• The applicant must obtain the approval of the Kinq
County Fire Protection Engineer for the adeguacy of the
fire hydrant, water main, and fire flow standards of
Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code.
8. Final plat approval shall zequire full compliance with
drainaqe provisions set forth in Kinq County Code 9.04
and current storm drainaqe requirements and quidelines
as established by Surface Water Management. Compliance
may result in reducfnq the number and/ar locatfon of
lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. The
following conditions represent portions of the Code and
requirements and shall apply to � plats.
a. BALD approval of the drainage and roadway plans is
required prior to any construction.
b. A separate Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) plan
for this project shall be submitted with the
enqineering plans. The plan shall show areas to
be cleared (limits of the clearinq) and provide a
schedule of construction (constr.uction sequence).
c. Retention/detention (R/p) facilities shall be
located in tracts, unless located within improved
Kinq County riqhts-ol-way. Maintenanca access
shall be provfded to all facilities. This vill
require a 15-foot access roadway to all manholes
(R/D). Access must also be pr.ovided for mainten-
ance of the er.*_ire pond.
d. Prior to recording of the final plat those
portfons of the retention/de�ention facility
necessary to control the flaws discharginq from
the site shall be constructad and operational.
e. oil/water separation facilities shall be provided
at each point of permanent storm drainaqe release
from the site so contamina�ts do not enter natural
drainaqe features. In adc�ition to standard Kinq
County oil/water separato�s, the applicant is
required to provide biofiltration prior to dis-
charqe of stormwater int� any sensitive area (e.q.
streams, wetlands, lake�, etc.). Such biofiltra-
LJ
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FILE N0. S89P0016
�
tion includes 200 feet of broad, flat-bottom,
grass-lined swales) or equivalent systems.
f. Drainaqe outlets (stub-outs) shall be provided for
each individual lot, except for those lots
approved for infiltration by Kinq County. Stub-
out shall be shown on the enqineered plans and
shall conform to the followinq:
1) Each outlet shall be suitably located at the
lowest elevation on the lot, so as to service
all future roof downspouts and footing
drains, driveways, yard drains, and any other
surface or subsurface drains necasBary to
render the lots suitable for their intended
u�e. Each outlet shall have frae-tlowinq,
positive drainaqe to an approved stormwater
conveyance system or to an approvsd outfall
location.
2) Outlets on each lot shall be located aith a
five-foot-hiqh, 2" x 4" stake marked "storm"
or "drain". The stub-out st�all extend above
surface level, be visible and be secur�ed to
the stake.
3) Pipe material shall conform to underdrain
specifications descrfbed in KCRS 7.04 and, if
non-metallic, the pipe shall contain wfre or
other acceptable detection feature.
4) Drainaqe easements are required for drainaqe
systems desiqned to convey flows throuqh more
than one lot.
5) The developer and/or contractor is
responsfble for coordinating the location of
all stub-out conveyance lines with respect to
the utilities (e.g. power, gas, telephone,
television).
6) All individual stub-outs shall be privately
owned and maintained by the lot home owner.
q. In some cases, on-site infiltration systems may be
accepted for detention for tha lots dsp�ndinq on
soil conditions. To determine tha suitability of
the soil for infiltration systems, a soils report
that includes percolation teste and a•oil loq
taken at 6-foot minimum depth shall be submitted
by a professional engineer, or soil specialist.
This shall inc:iude, at a minimum, intormation on
soil texture, depth to seasonal hiqh water and the
occurrence of mottlinq and impervious layers. The
report shall also address potential down qradient
impacts due to increased hydraulic loading on
slopes and structures. Soil permeability data
obtained from the design of the septic system may
be used tor the drywell retention eystem, provid�d
data is submitted verifyinq that no impervious
layer exists within 6 feet of the soil surface.
I! the soils report is approved, the intiltration
systems shall be installed at the time of the
buildinq permit. A note to this effect shall be
placed on the map paqe of the recorded document.
•
PROPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE
FI�E NO. S89P0016
•
The drainage plan and the recorded document shall
indicate each lot approved for infiltration.
h: Include with the drainage plan a downstream
analysis. This analysis must extend for a minimum
distance of 1/4 mile from the point of release of
each flow discharging from the =ite. The analysis
must address any existing problems with floodinq,
capacity, overtoppinq, scouring, sloughing,
erosion or sedimentation ot any c�rainage fecility,
whether natural or man-made. Probahle impacts due
to construction of the project must also be ad-
dressed with respect to these same concerns..
Where this analysis reveals more restrictive
conditions, more stringent drainaqe controla may
be requfred than would otherwise be necessary for
a project of this type. These controls may
include additional on-site rate and/or volume
controls, off-site improvements, or a combination
of.both. Any off- site improvements will require
the approval of all affected property owners.
i. Current standard notes and ESC notes, as
established by BALD engineerinq review, shall be
placed on the engineered plans.
j. The following notes shall be provided on the map
paqe of the recorded document:
"All building downspouts, footinq drains and
drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios
and driveways shall be connected to the approved
permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the
approved construction drawings � on
file with the Department of Public Works. This
plan shall be submitted with the application of
any building permit. All connections of the
drains must be constructed and approved prior to
the final buildinq inspection approval." Those
lots that are desiqnated for "Individual lot
infiltration systems, the systems shall be con-
structed at the time of the buildinq permit and
shall comply with plans on file at the Public
Works Record Center."
9. The followinq conditions specifically address drainaqe
issues for this particular plat:
a. Due to the erosion hazard and/or the nsed for
protection of proposed drainfield areas, clearinq
shall be limited to those areas reguired lor.
construction c: roadways and utilities prior to
recordinq.
b. A Type 1 wetland is located on a portion of the
subject property. The folloWinq items shall be
addressed on the enqineering plans and final plat:
1) The wetland edge shall ba tield surveyed and
shown on the plans. The wetland and a
100-foot buffer shall be shown in a separate
tract and designated as a Native Growth
Protection Easement (NGPE).
2) A 15-foot buildfng setback line (HSBL) ahall
be shown from the NGPE boundariea.
l0
• POSED
FILE NO.
•
3�:�,T OF CAMPUS RI DGE
S89P0016
- If the drainage basin area is less than
50 acres, use the 100-year/24-hour
storm.
If qreater than 50 acres, use the 100-
year/7-day storm.
'7"'c--�t.2Fl
l0.
c.
��
3) Based upon field inspection, the wetland
appears to be a closed depression with no
surface water outlet. The 100-year flood-
plain for the wetland ehall be determined.
The following criteria shall be used in
making this determination:
The applicant's enqineerinq submittal shall
include a qrading plan which addresses preparation
of the site for construction o! roads and houses.
Comprehensive measures shall ba addrassed on the
plan to minimize erosion and assure sediment-laden
water does not impact the wetland. A special
erosion control inspector ehall be retained by the
applicant to provide recommendations durinq imple-
mentation of the gradinq_plan and sybmft
reports_to the Kinq County Development Inspection
Unit. The enqineering plans shall outline this
requirement with descriptive notes and identify
the name and phone number of the individual re-
sponsible for assurinq compliance.
To prevent downstream erosion fmpacts and a
reduction in water quality, initial roadway and
lot construction activity shall occur only durinq
the months of April through September. Construc-
tion plans shall be submitted well in advance of
the September 30th deadline to assure that ade-
quate time is allowed for plan revisw/approval and
site stabiliaation after construction has pro-
ceeded. Final construction work may proceed past
these dates provided that the site is stabilfzed
and presents no serious erosion hazards.
The following statement shall be shown on the final
engineerinq plan and recorded plat:
Buildiaq 8�tbacks ana Nativ� cirowth Prot�atioa
Eas�m�nts
Structures, fill and obstructions (including, but not
limited to decks, patios, outbuildinga, or overhangs
beyond 18 inches) are prohibited within the buildinq �
setback line (BSBL) and restricted floodplaina (if
applicable), and within the Native Growth Protection
Easement(s) as shown.
Dedication ot a Native Gro�rth Protection Easement
(NGPE) conveys to the public a beneticial interest in
the land within the easement. This interest includes
the preservatiot� of native veqetation tor all purposes
that benefit the public health� safety and welfare,
includinq control of surface water and erosion, main-
tenance of slope stability, visual and aural butferinq,
and protection of plant and animal habitat. The NGPE
imposes upon all present and futurs owners and occu-
piers of the land, subject to the Qasement, the obliqa-
tion, enforceable on behalf of the public by Kinq
County, which permission must be obtained in writinq
11
�.0: ��L� Pi�•.- O.T' Cl�^'FCS RZD;;E •
FILE NO. 589P0016
from the King County Buildinq and Land Development
Division or its successor agency.
Before and durinq the course of any gradinq, bu.ildinq
construction, or other development activity on a lot
subject to the NGPE, the common boundar.y between the
easement and the area of development activity must be
fenced or otherwise marked to the satisfaction of Kinq
County or its successor aqency.
il. Southwest 323rd Street shall be improved,with curb,
qutter, and sidewalk where it abuts this site.
12. Seventh Avenue Southwest shall be improved with curb,
qutter, and sidewalk.
13. The planter islands (if any) within the cul-de-sacs
shall be maintained by the abuttinq lot owners. This
shall be stated on the face of the final plat.
14. Al1 lots adjoininq an area or havinq area with a NGPE
restriction �hall be provided with an acceptable
boundary delineation between the lot or portions of the
lot and the area restricted with the NGPE. Said
boundary delineation shall be in place prior to any
gradinq or clearing of the subdivision and remain in
place until a dwellinq is constructed on the lot and
ownership transferred to the first owner-occupant.
15. If lot make-up area is required, calculations
demonstratinq compliance must be submitted prior to
approval of the plan atid profile. (This requirement is
separate fro�n and in addition to open space required in
KCC 19.38.)
16. The applicant shall comply with K.C.C. 19.38 by payfnq
a fee to the Parks Division in-lieu-of providinq on-
site open space. (K.C.C. 19.38 establishes the formula
for said fee amount.)
17. A homeowners association or other workable orqanization
shall be established to the satisfaction of BALD which
provides for the ownership and continued•maintenance of
the open space area(s).
18. The "panhandles" qivinq access t'o lots li and 14 from
the cul-de-sac shall have a minimum of 20 feet in
width.
19. The followinq have been establiehed by SEPA as
necessary requirements of this development as mitiqa-
tion. The applicants shall demonstrate cospliance wfth
these.items prior tc final approval.
a. A 100-foot bufler shall be placed around Wetland
No. 3327, with an additional 15-foot BSBL beyond
the buffer. The wetland and the buffer shall have
an NGPE placed upon them and shall be placed in a
separate tract.
b. To protect the function of the NGPE around the
wetland, a fence shall be constructed alonq the
eastern rear lot lines of lots 14 through 22.
Fence detail shall be submitted to and approved by
the Kinq County BALD subdivision Products Sectfon
12
. • .
. �l.'� �''a._. v. ...........J ..1:,'.�L
. FILE N0. S89P0016
at the time of Road Plan and Profile/Drainage
Review.
NOTE: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control
(ESC) Plan Guidelines are to be strictly adhered to
durinq the entire period of project development due to
the ESC ratinq on the site of 16 ES (which rellects
moderate site topography, relatively small lot size,
high lot density, and on-site wetland area).
• : ; . . .
1. The subdivision s�iall conform to KCC 26.38 relatinq to
grading on private property.
2. Development of the subject property may requira
registration with the Washinqton State Department of
Licensing, Rea1 E�tate Division.
3. Preliminary, approval of this application doas not limit
the applicant's responsibility to obtain any reguired
permit or license from the State or other regulatory
body.
NL:FD:lg
12/13/89
TRANSMITTED TO PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER:
Graecen Construction, Inc.
1160 - 140th Ave. N.E., Suite E, Bellevue, WA 98005
Pac-Tech Enqineering, Inc.
2601 S. 35th St., Suite 200, Tacoma, WA 98409
Heritage Land Development
10317 - 122nd St. E., Puyallup, WA 98373
Bob Curtis
32628 - 7th Ave. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
Diana Kinared
1200 - li�th Ave. N.E., Suite C-240, Bellevue, WA
98004
New Construction Services
17233 - 140th Ave. S.E., �5, Renton, WA 98058
cail Bruce
10909 N.E. 4th, P.O. Box 97015, Bellevue, WA 98009
Peter Hayes
12443 Bel-Red Rd., Suite F, Bldq. 8, Bellewe, WA
98004
West Campus III Homeowners� Association
P.O. Box 7237, Federal Way, WA 98003
Thaddeus Kledzik
522 S.W. 324th St., Federal Way, W� 98003
Ronald A. Cowan .—
32616 - 7th �,ve. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
J. LaVillette '
515 S.W. 322nd St., Federal Way, WA 98023
Victoria How
32115 - 6th Ave. S.W., Fe�leral Way, N�► 98023
Euqene J. Haldas
P.O. Box 7578, Federal Way, WA 98003
Eileen Stauss
32636 - 7th Ave. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
Jerian & Dale Peterson
c/o West Campus Division III, P.O. Box 7Z37,
Federal Way, WA 98003
Mona Morris & Don Van Note
215 S.W. 327th P1., Federal Way, aA 98023
13
�OPOSED PLAT OF CAMPUS RIDGE •
FILE NO. S89P0016
Dae Ann Poston
32208 - 7th P1. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
Mr. Robert Curtis, Chairman
Campus Wood Wetland Preservation Committee,
P.O. Box 7237, Federal Way, WA 98003
Thomas Cross, D.D.O.
30809 - lst Ave. S., Federal Way, WA �8003
Richa,rd Burris
P.O. Box 8062, Federal Way, WA 98003
Don & Rosemary Bitterman
32242 - 7th Pl. S.W., Federal Way, WA 98023
14
b, f
• ; i �
- - -- ;� _ _ . � --_ _ _ �
�
�
- �
—�- � Fsr
N
CAMPUS RIDGE
SECTION 18� TOWNSHIP 21 NORTN. RANGE 4 EAST. W. M.
. ,.�,
_--�� g
� 2
A
G S ,'��
O� ,
! � � ' � � ,
i . . � ; �
\ 9 + � ; i �
I B� ,��E S e ,.,
. ,
� � r a
' / `` 1 ���� - ,'�� ^i —j � , � . ; , ' ! '
/ 'l
�' � � ` Y � � / � • �� � � � ..'.s/^ _ � � _r
` _ `��. �' /••' � .. � /�� % � `��1 �` � �
. .--� 1 ' f �• i � / ���.T'••;^�ti � 7r�
' • �' t � ' � �..'., • � .
� , �S(. �� - ,jl r� �. ��, ,�,� .�
� C ,:,. ' .'� � •. _�N '�`/�'.�.`! i� a I � �
-- -- � � z ,�i. � / ` �h `i- ; ii tic�l �
Z C'. 3 , �• � i /'�. ` 'f ` l � � \r' , � � i /` ti . 1 •
� ' \ � [ < <� �! • �. �.� � � y a
__ � j� . s�l- � r s ,1 e � , ' , . '
/ l� �—�� � � l l �. '.,a-� F
�. _ , 1 �. //= 1 '°�, ': . '-- . i! TM.�vt
�� �/ ''�� ,�
. � � —� �
. , � . ,�_ �/_ —` +,.�= e , , . .
; �� �- _._.... � � \ ��:� � ,
�
. �� � `' d t ' ' � :
: o . t' �� r� �� �� '� ' � I -
cn' �'` ,• t � _ '�"—
,: �.\ 2 ti , ` ^+.; � a I ;�; -�'�];. ;
, ., /
\�. �. a '- � � � -� .
m ' ,� . ,
� �' � � .\ '
_ �- J •` �'4 �` i \ �__'��C .
�� � \ �q f ��, �..�'— _,N
J `� � ' �'g � ' ;
, . / 2 �; ,i� � �
x � �
� '�`� �� .
� � i y 6r..
�o.�� _ . , � .
� � i o. � � I
., 1 , � .
3
._
�\ '
. 8 • � � �
. �
i � '.
�. . .
\ , � ` �.
�
F' \ � \ � , �
fu '.�
� I ti
�
N' ! y
ATTACNMENT i
, , . ;
��
►.����; t��������•
1 'lennin�; and Connnunllv
� Ua•� riop�ucn� UI� blon
� 1'.r. 1.. P:.:r:ir.r sr.d
. Ar. , i:, r. U�.�,�.�q�r:i!
. � "n:ih Tnwrr Nui?�!�n
- ' � . , �i�! rlrrnur
h :. .� . 9P.:!y
(3 u 1 �1 ` Y�6•AGSO
•
: %^.� ` � S p f ;'.� '
: �;;`'�� ;,��'' ����EIVEp
���'
.•,` r%
� APk '1 f 1989
���''��� �a��:���
�aril 24, 1989
T�� 1rv Bert ig, Acting Manager� Building and Land Developrnent Division
FM: ��
_ Crai la en� Chief� Cortmunity Planning Section
Rc: BALD F� �
No. S89P0016' Pro osed Plat of Cam us Rid e
The proposed plat is consistent with the Federal Way Communfty Plan which
designates the property Single Family� four to nirte homes per acre. The
�+rea loning is SR.
1
The Sensitive Areas Map Folio indicates Lower Puget Sound wet'and number
27 - Wetiand Rating I( Unique/Outstanding) is located within portions
of the �roposed p1at, The proposed 100 foot buffer is consistent with
Kir,y County Comprehensive Plan policy E-329.
LL:Fw:fj
� �� �• a s /004
�=: Lois Schwennesen, � Planning and Community Development Oivision
RT7r�: pa�� WoZniak, Community Planner
�e-ek P�on, Chief, Resource P)anning
AT7N: Erik Stockdale, Resource Planner
0
AT TA C I-1 M E NT .�
.
�� �� .. '+ �_,
�.�. n.. .. ... ,. •
•• COND I T I ONS OF PERM I TiA�P�k: �i; � u DATE: l 0i24i89
Pro iect Nos,:.S89P0016 TYPE: PRE-P�AT PAGE: 1
Locet �on: KC QC� i 4 15d9
F I RE CON01 T 1 ONS �� �1 , �� p� SUbUlY1J1Urv� •
I��" �'-
F8C0 - Prel�minery Fire Enqineering epprovel hea been grented besed
upon the following informet�on provided.
To obta�n fi�al Fi�e Enginee�ing epp�ovel the followiny �
item(s) mu�t be submitted� reviemed end eppro�ed:
I• Certificate of Weter Aveilebility. (Provided by �
app�opriate weter purveyor). Velid one yeer from dete
of �igneture. Hinimum ecceptence�flow ahell be 1000
9ailons per minute et 20 pound� per squere inch
rea�duel.
1I. Three copiea of plens indieeting: '
A, Fire hydrant(s) locetion - meesured by vshiculer�
trevel diatence. IK.C. Ordi�enep No. 5828)
Residential
�
1. 700 ft. meximum spacing. '
2. Not more then 350 ft. from eech lot.
8. Watermein plecement tK.C. Ordinance No. 5828) �
1. Souree (i.e.) supply eonnection, �
2. Ma�n sizes identified,
3. Valves, fitting�, etc.
C. Fire eccens roada (U.F.C. Seetion 10.207) �
1. Minimum 20 ft. wide� unobet�ucted - 13'6" �
verticel cleerence� unobatructed. All-weether
surfece� eble to withstend 25 tona.
2. Fire eceess �oeda in excesa of 150 feet �
(deed-ends), must have a turn-eround e�se.
Required turn-arounds muat be a minimum 80 foot
diemeter.
3. Fi�e eccess �oeds muat provide ?0 foot minimum �
inside turning redius �nd �0 foot outside
turning redius when aeid roede cheng• dirsetion.
4. Fire secesa roeds ahall not exceed 15fi g�ed�. �
5. The requirsd width of any fi�e eppa�etua ace�sa�
roed ahal! not be obat�ueted in sny manne�� in-
cludi�g perki�g of vehicles. Minimum �equirsd
widths end cleerenees eatebliahed unde� this
aeetion sheli be meinteined et all timea.
6. Whsn required, approved siQna o�..oths� •oo�ovsd�
�otie�s shell bs p�ovided �nd m�inteined fo�
fire epp�r�tus eeeesa �oeds to idsntify sueh
roada end p�ohibit the obstruction the�sof o�
both.
F605 - Finai PP q ' ! �"' ' • "
plat;a �oval.rs ui��• •n.�;��p�etion �nd •pprov�l of
ths.,F;�e •hydr�nt ��d w�t�rm�in• in�t � ll�tion �by • K.C. BALD
._. Commerei�l f���•:in�p�cto�� p�ior.;to��cording. G11:•�.
�. 296-6615; �FCer'a p�rmit•to'inst�ll has b�en obtainid''f�om
BA��: Fi�s P�ot�ction_Enginee�ing. , •
ATTAC H M E NT 3
�
� w
0
��
.
•
\
/ .
I .'
t�
>T.V I i )f 11 ��HItiC11 )V
DEP OF ECOLOGY -
�!.r:l.Srop Pl•rl . iii�`�
nhrry��r, 11'r�h�nqrnn 9 NSWR.'l! • (1(.K �- :;�
� ri�(Xb � a, )
October 17, 1989 � =��
:Z r•
'.' :c
R� :,�::�
Mr. Ralph Colby
King County BALD
3600 - 136th Place SE
Bellevue, WA 98006
Dear Mr. Colby;
0� C�
s;,�,��� S U 19 89
NS
��i
�� ;';
:.� (,�
(' �
� �;1
� ,.
�,�
'V ,
0
Thank you for the o
of nonsig�ificance ppOrtunity to �o�ent on the determination
bY Herita for the Campus Ridqe Subdivision
environmentalachecklistp�ent (�S89P0016 , pr�Posed
and have the followin r�viewed the
1 • We agree with g COmments.
pora Y�ur call for strict adherence to the
rY erosion and sedimentation control
tire life of the construction tem-
project, plan throuqh the en-
2 • The Washinqton State Clean Air Act re
all known, available quires the use of
�pollution � and reasonable means of controllin
tion activitiesuc durin
g air
sources such as Y wettin g �onstruc-
before the areas of exposed sofls g those dust
yravel constructionhentrances�d installingsand maintaininglb
track-out is also Construction vehicle
track-out can tri a�a�Or dust source.
gqer violations and finesYfromdEcolo�f
the local air aqency.
gy or
If you have any questions on
Rachel Fri edman_Thomas of CO � Qe nt 1, plesse
(2G6) g67_� the Northwest Re �all Ms.
Mr. ,7 128 Questfons on Comment 2 shouldabe�ffice at'
8 �� _ � y Willenberg of the Northwest Regional Officelatcted to
117.
(206)
Sincerely,
—' ' ' �
'��"�_�.ii� .!�{,a[; �4 � 4.
Barbara J. �itchie
Environmental Review Section,
BJR:
cc: Rachel Friedmen-Thomas
Jay Willenberq
�
A TTACHMEIVT'4
g
�
�
I t
� ..� •,w. .-+-� �- •.• �..,
' .r
.�_ : ._
:l•���_ .: .1 :.i.�l..
• E�n�:� i;;::ld�ng • 8±1 Scc��nd Ave. • Scaltle. 11 'A•4•]SoB
October 16, 1989
Ba:ba:a Questad
Kin3 CoLnty Buildir,g
ar.3 Lan 1 Development
3600 - 136th Place Southeast
Bellevue, WA 98006-1400
•ac
Dete: of Nonsignificance
Tile ?ro. 589PO01� HQ t*aa Land D v
p r, r
Dear Ms. Questad:
' ' �f _.r+�r.
cro
�
� ° ::1
:�='',.�.•' c�
r%i n ~ ���
-• c� — c)
� �O � f''
?;o Z `�
rn
.J
Metro sta�f has reviewed this prcposal and anticipates no
siqnificant impacts to Metro's wastewater facilities or
puhlic transportation services. However, we have the
follo�:i.ng comments regardinq water quality:
This project is near a wet2and that is included in ICinq
county�s sensitive areas program. In order to minimize
a3verse environmental impacts to this wetland, we recommend
tl:e following protective measures:
- Ide:;tify any tributary, watercourse or surface drainaqe
r,ear :he construction site that might enter the wetland
area.
- Adhere to measures re�uired in the Kinq County drainaqe
rrar.Lal for water qualfty swales. Copies o! this
do�Lr�en,. are available from Kinq County, Resource
Planning Division.
- King County and the developer ahould ensure, through
� a�onitoring proqram, that the proposed wetland
mitigation measures are implamented and are adequately
protectinq the wetland. One or both of the parties
s::ould be designated responsible for designing and
inple*�er.tinq additional mesures in the event these
rrove inadequate,
T::ar.}; you for the opportunity to review and comment.
Slr.cerely,
�' / ;�.,�, �./ ,% �'�� ,!- :.i�� .
�'.�: Gre�ory M, Bush, Manager �
. Environneatal Planninq Divisfon
GKB:jmg3027
e
ATTA C �-�1 MENT 5'
�)V
�. •
� � �.n_n:� n:i�i1�E LAnJ DEY�LOPF�NT •
PROPOSAL: 10.45 ACRES INTO fl5 LOTS
� S7�R: 18-21-4
`���G..L.d pROPOSED
SUBDIVISION' N�
� o ----.... -N--
o • N I P. U. D. I
� �.-._J
I�. N
C
N � a �
� . /
6 . � ,�
_ � '.R
S-R "-
' 6U0' I
�
�
�
i
1
I
>
I
I
I
t
t
i
1
I
I
�
�
i
�
I
�
I I
I
FILE Sg9p0016 •