Res 92-102
RESOLUTION NO.
92-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, REGARDING WASHINGTON
STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT GRANT FUNDS FOR 1992-1993.
WHEREAS, the 1990 and 1991 State Legislatures passed the Growth Management Act
legislation which requires all jurisdictions in King County to prepare comprehensive plans in accordance
with its requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires jurisdictions' plans to be consistent; and
WHEREAS, the 1991 Growth Management Act requires the adoption of countywide planning
policies in 1992; and .
WHEREAS, the Legislature appropriated funds to assist local governments in implementing the
1990 and 1991 Growth Management Act; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development has allocated $2,290,066 to King
County general purpose governments provided that 60% of those governments representing 75 % of the
County's population agree to the grant distribution formula and a joint regional strategy for growth
management activities; and
WHEREAS, the City approved by Resolution the elements required to accept 1990-l991 Growth
Management Act grant funds and an interlocal agreement with King County regarding the distribution
of those funds; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized under RCW 39.34 to enter into interlocal agreements; and
WHEREAS, the King County Liaison Group, an interjurisdictional group of planning, public
works, and finance officials, has recommended a grant distribution formula and Joint Regional Strategy
for 1992;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
To be eligible to apply for 1991-1992 Growth Management Act funds, the City agrees to:
A. Authorize the Mayor to sign an interlocal agreement with King County regarding the
distribution of 1991-92 Growth Management Act grant funds, substantially in the form of Attachment
A;
B. Participate and provide information and data as requested to accomplish the 1992 Joint
Regional Strategy (Attachment 1);
COpy
C. The grant allocation formula which reserves $332,000 for region-wide efforts and reduces
each jurisdiction's allocation by 14.5% from the 1990-91 formula of $35,000 base and a per capita
allocation based on the jurisdiction's share of the total county population (Attachment 2);
D. Designate the King County Liaison Group, and inteIjurisdictional group of planning, public
works and finance officials, to coordinate the inteIjurisdictional work in the Joint Regional Strategy
(Attachment 3);
E. Designate King County as the fiscal agent to: submit the application to DCD for 1991-92
Growth Management Act grant funds on behalf of participating jurisdictions; receive DCD grant funds;
and distribute funds to jurisdictions according to the approved allocation formula.
RESOLVED BY THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF FEDERAL WAY,
WASHINGTON, this 17th day of
March
, 1992.
C1TY OF FEDERAL WAY
çJo@ç~
Mayor, Robert Stead
aney, CMC
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~.~~ ~C,,~
FILED WiTH THE CITY CLERK: March 12, 1992
PASSED BY THE C1TY COUNCIL: March l7, 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 92-l02
CDlKBlRESI92-O100.LMS
ATTACHMENT A
A SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE DISTRIBUTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF CERTAIN
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1990
199
THIS AGREEMENT, si9ned this - day of
by and between Ki ng County and the City/Town of
("the Municipal Jurisdiction").
WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature passed the Growth Management
Act of 1990 and 1991 (Chapter 17), hereinafter referred to as "the Act," which
requires all jurisdictions in the County of King to prepare comprehensive
plans consistent with new guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires that jurisdictions prepare these plans in
cooperation with nei9hboring units of general government; and
WHEREAS, the State of Washington through the adoption and administration
of the Act will make funds available to local jurisdictions through the State
of Washington Department of Community Development, hereinafter referred to as
DCD, fo.r expenditure during the 1991-1992 funding years; and
WHEREAS, the Act directs DCD to establish funding levels for planning
and technical assistance grants for counties and cities that plan under this
Act and DCD has allocated approximately $2_29 million dollars to King County
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County
have been designated together as a county region by DCO for the purpose of
receiving DCD funds; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires King County' and the municipal jurisdictions within
King County to develop a regional work program, hereinafter referred to as a
"Joint Regional Strategy," for the 1992 calendar year and beyond for implemen-
tation of the Act and for the purpose of receiving DCD funds and to designate
an institutional framework to coordinate the accomplishment of the Joint
Regional Strategy; and
WHEREAS, DCO requires King County and the municipal jurisdictions within
Ki ng County to develop an all ocat i on formul a for rece i pt of the DCD grant
funds within the county region and designate a fiscal agent to receive and
distribute DCO funds according to the approved allocation formula; and
WHEREAS, DCD requires that the Joint Regional Strategy and allocation
formula be approved by 60% of legislative authorities of the county and
municipal jurisdictions within King County representing 75% of the total
population of King County; and
WHEREAS, only King County and municipal jurisdictions which have adopted
the Joint Regional Strategy and have agreed to the allocation formula by
resolution, motion, or ordinance will be eligible to receive DCD grant funds;
and
WHEREAS, in 1991 King County and municipal jurisdictions entered into
interlocal agreements for the distribution of 1990-1991 DCD Growth Management
Act grant funds which included approving a 1991 Joint Regional Strategy and
grant allocation formula; and
WHEREAS, the King County Liaison Committee, which consists of Planning
Directors, Public Works Directors and Finance Directors representing King
County, the City of Seattle, and other municipal jurisdictions within King
County, recommends the Joint Regional Strategy and the grant allocation
formula contained herein; and
WHEREAS, King County has entered into a contract with DCD to serve as
fiscal agent for the distribution of grant funds among King County and the
municipal jurisdictions within King County; and
WHEREAS, in November 1991 the King County Council through the adoption
of Ordinance #10182, Section 76. appropriated DCD funds for distribution to
King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County for the 1991-
1992 funding year; and
WHEREAS, King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction enter into this
Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with the State Interlocal Cooperation
Act, RCW Chapter 39.34, for the purpose of distributing and administrating DCD
funds and for the execution of activities in accordance with and under author-
ity of the Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIOERATION OF THE FOREGOING CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN
CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES HEREIN, IT IS AGREED THAT:
I.
GENERAL AGREEMENT
King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction agree to comply with the
provisions of the "Joint Regional Strategy," which is attached hereto as
Attachment 1 and is incorporated herein as is fully set forth, by under-
taking growth management activities, including coordination of planning
efforts to ach i eve cons i stency, the development of a pub lie part i ci pa-
tion process, and undertaking other coordinated planning activities as
specified in the Growth Management Act of 1990 and 1991.
II.
ENTITLEMENT
The parties agree that the allocation of funds appropriated by the State
of Washington Department of Community Development ("DCD") among King
County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County shall be
governed by the following provisions as outlined in the Grant Allocation
Formula, which is attached hereto as Attachment 2 and is incorporated
herei n as is fully set forth;
A.
8y enterin9 this Agreement the Municipal Jurisdiction is eli9ible
to receive a direct share, hereinafter referred to as a pass-
through, of DCD funds as calculated in the Grant Allocation
Formula, which is based on the following principles;
1.
Of the total DCD grant to Kin9 County, $332,000 shall be
reserved for county-wide efforts. This results in the
Municipal Jurisdiction Share calculated under subsections
A.2 and A.3 below being reduced by fourteen and one-half
percent (14.5%).
2 -
The pass-through shall include a minimum amount of $35,000.
3.
The remainder of the funds shall be allocated on a per
capita basis based on a proportional distribution of total
population with King County as determined in the April 1991
estimate by the State of Washington Office of Financial
Management.
If the Municipal Jurisdiction is partially within King
County and partially within an adjacent county, it shall
have its base amount adjusted based on the proportion of its
population which is located in King County.
4.
8.
King County shall distribute any unallocated funds in the same
manner as described in paragraph II(A)(2) above or in another
manner approved by King County and a minimum of nineteen (19)
municipal jurisdictions within King County. Together the popula-
tion of unincorporated King County and the approving municipal
jurisdictions must represent 75% of the total population of King
County.
c.
This Agreement is contingent upon the adoption of a resolution,
motion, or ordinance by the Municipal Jurisdiction approving the
Joint Regional Strategy and Grant Allocation Formula for DCD grant
funds and of a municipal work program which outlines the Municipal
Jurisdiction's implementation of the Act or the Joint Regional
Strategy.
I I I.
REIMBURSEMENT PROVISIONS
The parties agree that King County is the designated fiscal agent for
the distribution of DCD funds under the terms of this Agreement. Within
ten (10) business days after receiving each quarterly warrant from DCD,
King County shall issue a warrant to the Municipal Jurisdiction for an
amount equal to one quarter (to the nearest dollar) of the total amount
the Muni c i pa 1 Juri sdi ct i on is ent itl ed to recei ve accord i ng to the Grant
Allocation Formula.
IV.
USE OF FUNDS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
A.
Funds provided to the Mun i c i pa I Juri sdi ct i on under th is Agreement
shall be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the
requirements of the Act and to implement the Joint Regional
Strategy.
B.
The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to conduct the appropriate
citizen participation activities as required by the Act, Section
14. Such activities shall include the broad dissemination of
proposa 1 s and a 1 tern at i ves, opportun ity for wri tten comments,
public meeting after effective notice, provisions for open discus-
sion, communication programs, information services, and considera-
t i on of and response to pub 1 i c comments.
V.
ROLE OF THE LIAISON GROUP
The parties agree that the King County Liaison Group (Attachment 3),
which consists of the planning directors, public works directors, and
finance directors or their designees from King County, the City of
Seattle, and other municipal jurisdictions within King County, shall
serve as a joint forum for the review and recommendation of policy
matters and state requirements to the legislative authorities of King
County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County. The parties
hereby agree that the Liaison Group shall prepare for DCD an annual
regional progress report which describes accomplishments of the Joint
Regional Strategy.
VI.
RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF THE MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall have the following responsibilities and
powers:
A.
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall propose to its legislative
authority a local work program which includes an examination of
its role in recognizing and addressing regional or county-wide
needs through a coordinated funding approach with King County and
other municipal jurisdictions.
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall prepare an annual progress report
in accordance with the primary objectives and requirements of the
Act, Section 19. The Municipal Jurisdiction's annual progress
report shall be sent to the Office of the Manager, King County
Planning and Community Development Division, 707 Smith Tower
Building, 506 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 9BI04.
B.
C.
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall exercise its discretion in deter-
mining the use of its pass-through funds in a manner consistent
with the Act and the Joint Regional Strategy including the Munici-
pal Jurisdiction's local policies.
VI I.
D.
The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to propose to its legislative
authority activities and budgets for inclusion in the implementa-
tion of the Joint Regional Strategy.
E -
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall send representatives to partici-
pate act i ve ly in techni ca 1 forums for the purpose of accompli sh i ng
the Joint Regional Strategy-
F.
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall prepare and submit to King County
for transmittal to DCD a short written description of high prior-
ity growth management work program projects upon which the Munici-
pal Jurisdiction intends to begin work during the period between
July I, 1991 and June 30, 1992. This description shall include
reference to work program projects which implement the Joint
Regi ona 1 Strategy.
G.
The Municipal Jurisdiction undertaking activities and/or projects
with DCD funds distributed under this Agreement retains full civil
and criminal liability as though these funds were locally gener-
ated.
H.
The Muni ci pal Juri sdi ct ion shall full y comply with the State
Envi ronmenta 1 Pol icy Act.
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall maintain accounts and records,
including personnel, property, financial, and programmatic
records, and other such records as deemed necessary, to ensure
proper account i ng for all proj ect funds and comp Ii ance with thi s
Agreement. All such records shall sufficiently and properly
reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and
services provided in the performance of this Agreement. These
records shall be maintained until June 30, 1994, unless a longer
retention period is required by law.
I.
RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS OF KING COUNTY
King County, by and through its employees, agents, and representatives,
agrees to:
A.
Obtain and present to the Liaison Group al1 applicable State and
DCD policy guidelines, special conditions, and format requirements
related to the implementation of the Joint Regional Strategy and
related to the administration of the grant funds distributed
pursuant to the Act, Sect i on 2O.
Prepare and present to DCD the annual progress report regarding
the implementation of the Joint Regional Strategy as required by
DCD pursuant to the Act, Section 19.
B.
c.
Identify supplemental sources of funding to increase the ability
of King County and the municipal jurisdictions within King County
to carry out effective growth management activities.
0-
Prepare reports, organize meetings and technical forums/work
9roups as needed for the Liaison Group to assist in the implemen-
tation of the Joint Regional Strategy.
VIII. GENERAL TERMS
A.
This Agreement for the 1991-1992 fund distribution shall be effec-
tive July I, 1991 through June 30, 1992. The parties acknowledge,
however, that commitments to accomplish the Joint Regional Strat-
egy do not terminate with this Agreement. The parties agree to
use their best efforts to work with DCD to secure additional
funding beyond the 1991-1992 funding period and to execute subse-
quent agreements.
The King County Council through the adoption of Ordinance #10182,
Section 76 appropriated DCD funds for distribution to King County
B.
IX.
X.
and the municipal jurisdictions within King County for the 1991-
1992 funding year;
C.
It is recognized that amendments to this Agreement may become
necessary, and such amendment shall take place only when the
part i es have executed a written addendum to th is Agreement.
EVALUATION AND MONITORING
A.
The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by
this Agreement shall be subject to inspection, review, or audit by
King County so authori zed or as requested by DCD duri ng the
performance of thi s Agreement and unt il June 30, 1994, unless a
longer retention period is required by law-
B.
The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees to cooperate with any monitoring
or evaluation activities conducted by King County that pertain to
the subject of this Agreement. The Municipal Jurisdiction agrees
to allow King County, DCD, the State Auditor, and/or any of their
employees, agents, or representatives to have full access to and
the right to examine during normal business hours and as often as
King County may deem necessary, all of the Municipal Jurisdic-
t i on's records with respect to all matters covered by th is Agree-
ment. King County and/or any of its employees, agents, or repre-
sentatives shal1 be permitted to audit, examine, and make excerpts
or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all
i nvoi ces, materi a 1 s, payro 11 s, and record of matters covered by
this Agreement. King County will give advance notice to the
Municipal Jurisdiction in the case of fiscal audits to be
conducted.
C.
The results and records of sa i d eva 1 uat ion sha 11 be ma i nta i ned and
disclosed in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17.
HOLD HARMLESS
A.
King County assumes no responsibility for the payment of any
compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes to or on behalf of the
Municipal Jurisdiction, its employees, or others by reason of this
Agreement. The Municipal Jurisdiction shall protect, indemnify
and save harmless King County, its officers, agents, and employees
from and against any and all claims, costs, and losses whatsoever
occurring or resulting from (1) the Municipal Jurisdiction's
failure to pay any such compensation, wages, benefits, or taxes;
and (2) the supplying to the Municipal Jurisdiction of work,
services. materials, or supplies by municipal employees or others
in connection with or in support of the performance of this Agree-
ment.
B.
The Municipal Jurisdiction further agrees that it is financially
respons i b 1 e for and shall repay Ki ng County a 11 i nd i cated amounts
fo 11 owi ng an audi t except i on wh i ch occurs due to the negl i gence,
intentional acts or failure for any reason to comply with the
terms of this Agreement by the Municipal Jurisdiction, its offi-
cers, employees, agents, or representat i ves. Th is duty to repay
King County shal1 not be diminished or extinguished by the prior
termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section VIII or Section
IX.
C.
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall protect, defend, indemnify, and
save harmless King County and the State of Washington, their offi-
cers, employees, and agents from any and all costs, claims, judg-
ments, or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way
resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Municipal
Jurisdiction, its officers, employees, or agents. The Municipal
Jurisdiction agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph
extend to any c 1 aim, demand, or cause of act i on brought by or on
behalf of any employee of the Municipal Jurisdiction against King
County, its officers, agents, or employees, and includes any judg-
ment, award, and cost arising therefrom, including attorney fees-
King County shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless
the Municipal Jurisdiction, its officers, employees, and agents
from any and all costs, c 1 aims, judgments, or awards of damages,
arising out of or in any way resulting from the negligent acts or
omissions of King Counti, its officers, employees, or agents-
King County agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph
extend to any claim, demand, or cause of action brought by or on
behalf of any employee of King County against the Municipal Juris-
diction, its officers, agents, or employees, and includes any
judgment, award, and cost arising therefrom, including attorney
fees -
Claims shall include, but not be limited to, assertions that the
use or transfer of any software, book, document, report, film,
tape, or sound reproduct i on or 'materi a 1 of any ki nd, del i vered
hereunder, const itutes an i nfri ngement or any copyri ght, patent,
trademark, trade name, or otherwise results in unfair trade
practice.
D.
The Municipal Jurisdiction shall provide King County with evidence
of general liability insurance with limits of no less than $1
mi 11 i on per occurrence to provi de coverage for c 1 ai ms for i nj uri es
to persons or damages to property whi ch may ari se from, or in
connection with the performance of work hereunder by the Municipal
Jurisdiction, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcon-
tractors. If the Municipal Jurisdiction is self-insured for this
requirement, a certification of self-insurance shall constitute
compliance with this section.
XI.
TERMINATION
A.
Th is Agreement may be termi nated wi thout cause by Ki ng County, in
whole or in part, prior to the date specified in Section VIII,
upon thirty (30) days advance written notice of the termination to
the Municipal Jurisdiction.
If at any time during the term of this Agreement, either (I) the
State of Washington terminates King County's DCD grant status, or
otherwise acts to terminate, reduce, modify, or withhold its grant
funding to King County, or (2) any necessary appropriations of
funds for the Municipal Jurisdiction are not made to King County
by the State of Washington, or are revoked or withheld, or (3) the
Ki ng County Counci 1 does not appropri ate DCD funds for di stri bu-
tion to the Municipal Jurisdiction, then King County may terminate
this Agreement upon giving twenty (20) days' written notice to the
Municipal Jurisdiction. The parties acknowledge that, except as
otherwise specifically provided for herein, King County shall in
no event be responsible for the payment of any funds to the Munic-
ipal Jurisdiction. King County, as the official fiscal agent,
shall have the authority and responsibility to ensure that upon
termination of this Agreement, any remaining DCD funds are made
available in the manner described in paragraph !I(C) above and in
accordance with state regulations, or returned to DCD.
B.
C.
Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish ani right or
remedy provi ded by thi s Agreement or 1 aw that either party may
have in the event that the obligations, terms, and conditions set
forth in this Agreement are breached by the other party.
XI I.
REDUCTION OF FUNDS
In the event that there is a reduction of funds by the State of Washing-
ton or DCD, and if such funds are the basi s for th i s Agreement, then
King County may unilaterally terminate all or part of this Agreement, or
King County and the Municipal Jurisdiction may reduce their respective
scopes of work or budgets under thi s Agreement.
XIII. SEVERABILITY
In the event any term or condition of this Agreement or application
thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity
shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications of this
Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition
or application- To this end the terms and conditions of this Agreement
are declared severable.
XIV.
RECAPTURE PROVISION
A.
In the event that OCO elects to recapture funds from either King
County or the Municipal Jurisdiction for failure to expend grant
funds in accordance with state law and/or the provisions of this
Agreement, King County reserves the right to recapture such funds
on behalf of DCD in an amount equivalent to the extent of noncom-
pliance.
B.
Such right of recapture shall exist for a period not to exceed
three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. Repay-
ment by the Municipal Jurisdiction of such funds under this recap-
ture provision shall occur within thirty (30) days of demand.
Funds recaptured by King County shall be returned to DCD. In the
event that King County is required to institute legal proceedings
to enforce the recapture provi sian, or is requ i red to part i ci pate
in legal proceedings as a result of the Municipal Jurisdiction's
non camp 1 i ance with the provi s ions of thi s Agreement, or is
required to reimburse the State of Washington for the cost of
legal proceedings, then King County shall be entitled to reim-
bursement of its costs from the Municipal Jurisdiction, including
reasonab 1 e attorney's fees.
XV.
NONDISCRIMINATION
There shall be no discrimination against any employee or independent
contractor paid by any funds which are the subject of this Agreement or
against any applicant for such employment because of race, religion,
color, sex, age, sexual orientation, handicap, or national origin. This
provision shall include, but not be limited to the following: employ-
ment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, advertising, lay-off
or termination, rates of payor other forms of compensation, and selec-
tion for training.
The Municipal Jurisdiction and any independent contractor paid by funds
which are the subject of this Agreement shall comply with the require-
ments of Sect i on 504 of the Rehabi 1 itat i on Act of I 973, as amended.
XVI.
RI GHTS TO OTHER PARTI ES
It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the bene-
fit of the parties hereto and conveys no right to any other party.
XVII. GOVERNING LAW AND FlUNG
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and
the validity and performance hereof shall be governed by, the laws of
the State of Washington. This Agreement shall be filed with the city
clerk of the Municipal Jurisdiction, the King County Records and Elec-
tion Division, and the State of Washington Department of Community
Development.
XVI I I. ADMINISTRATION
A.
King County's representative shall be
Address:
Phone:
B.
The Municipal Jurisdiction's representative shall be
Address:
Phone:
XIX-
ENTIRE AGREEMENT/WAIVER OF DEFAULT
The parties agree that this Agreement is the complete expression of the
terms hereto and any oral representations or understandings not incorpo-
rated herei n are excl uded. Both parties recogni ze that time is of the
essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement. Waiver
of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent
default. Waiver or breach of any provision of the Agreement shall not
be deemed to be waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not
be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Agreement unless
stated to be such through written approval by King County, which shall
be attached to the original Agreement.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION
Signature of
Designated Official
King County Executive
Official Title
City or Town
approved as to form on 1 y bv
K i nq Countv Prosecut i nq Attornev
per memo dated December 12, Iggl
APPROVUAS TO FORM:
~~
Official Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GM2/gmagree7
ATT ACHMENT 1
KING COUNTY JOINT REGIONAL STRATEGY
1992
Background:
The interjurisdictional coordination required by the Growth Management Act has been undertaken in King
County through the establishment of Technical Forums and Public Works Work Groups in 1991. These Inter-
jurisdictional actlv~ies will be coordinated through the liaison Group, which consists of planning, public works
and finance directors of Seattle, suburban c~ies and King County, and is chaired by Lois Schwennesen, King
County Parks Planning and Resources Dlrector- The Planning Directors Association and Public Works Direc-
tors will continue to work in conjunction w~h the liaison Group to oversee inte~urisdictional efforts. The rec-
ommended grant distribution formula reserves $86,000 for regional funding to support staffing of the interjuris-
dictional Technical Forums and Work Groups.
Primary Activities for 1992 include:
1.
Countywide Planning Policies:
ReESHB 1025 requires countywide planning policies to be adopted by July, 1992 according to an
agreed-upon process. The recommended grant distribution formula reserves $246,000 for regional
funding to support this effort.
Actions: According to the process agreed to by King County jurisdictions, a Growth Management
Planning Council of King County, an interjurisdictional group of elected officials, will recommend poli-
cies to King County. Following King County adoption, the policies will be submitted to c~ies for ratifi-
cation. King County Executive staff will prepare policy alternatives for review by the Uaison Group (see
Attachment).
Milestones:
GMPC begins meeting
Dec 1991
Recommendation on Urban Area pattern
Feb 1992
Draft Policies to C~ies for Review
April 1992
Final Recommendations to King County
May 1992
King County Adoption
June 1992
Ratification by c~ies
July 1992
Products: Countywide Planning Policies on elements required by ReESHB 1025, locally based dispute
resolution process, and public participation/input on Countywide policies-
JRS
December 19,1991
2.
Urban Growth Areas
Background: The Urban Growth Area Technical Forum established in 1991 will continue its work in
1992. King County and cities will participate in the Technical Forum and provide information and data
as requested to aid in recommendations for Urban Growth Area for the county and for individual cities.
An interim Urban Growth Area established under the Growth Management Act by King County Ordi-
nance 9849, adopted in March, 1991, is recognized as preserving options for the final designation of
Urban Growth Areas in 1993.
1991 Accomplishments:
Agreed on a process and criteria for designating urban growth areas
Identified data required to support Urban Growth Area designation
1992 Objectives:
Oversee the collection and analysis of land use and level of service data (Ongoing)
Review preliminary draft policies (March 1992)
Review and propose methods to encourage urban growth (April 1992)
Propose draft urban growth areas (August 1992)
Prepare draft map of alternative city urban growth areas (September 1992)
Review recommended UGA and policies (November 1992)
Contributing Products From Other Technical Forums And Work Groups:
The work and products of other Work Groups and Technical Forums contribute to the objectives of the
Urban Growth Area designation process by providing information and recommendations on infra-
structure level of service and financing, land capacity, fair share of affordable housing, and open space
systems for community separators. The groups also provide information-sharing and encourage con-
sistency between jurisdictions in preparing Comprehensive Plan elements required by the Growth
Management Act King County and cities will participate in the Work Groups and Technical Forums
and will provide information and data as requested to assist in the completion of products and objec-
tives of the groups. Detailed work plans for each Technical Forum and Work Group have been pre.
pared and presented here in summary form.
Transportation Work Group
1991 Accomplishments:
Agreed to a common process for travel demand forecasting and worked with PSRC in developing land
use and transportation models.
Researched methodologies for arterials and transit, and will have agreement on conceptual level of
service approach.
JRS
2
December 12,1991
1992 Objectives:
Establish a coordinated and consistent arterial level of service standard and work with Metro to set a
transit level of service tied to land use actions (preliminary standards-February 1992, Final standards-
June, 1992)
Develop future estimates of travel demand based on land use aiternatives (preliminary forecasts-March
1992; Revised forecasts-July 1992)
Establish a process for estimating transportation needs based on levels of service and demand esti-
mates. Assess adequacy (August 1992) and develop a process for reevaluating or reassessing alter-
native actions for achieving adequacy (September 1992)
Analyze financing adequacy and develop strategies to finance alternative land use/transportation
scenarios. (preliminary-February, 1992; FinaJ-August, 1992)
Data Resources Technical Forum
1991 Accomplishments:
Agreed on a method to estimate residential capacity of land under current plans in incorporated and
unincorporated King County. .
Initiated data work in each jurisdiction to estimate residential capacity and produced a map identifying
capacity by census tract, jurisdiction and planning area-
1992 Objectives:
Produce redevelopment capacity data and mapping (January 1992)
Integrate critical areas data to refine land capacity estimates and support delineation of urban separa-
tors (February, 1992)
Compare land capacity results with growth forecasts for 2010 (May, 1992)
Integrate capital facilities and utilities data with land capacity and forecast data to support UGA desig-
nation (June-November, 1992)
Determine a unit of measurement for consistency in analyzing and mapping data.
Critical Areas Technical Forum
1991 Accomplishments:
Produced King County Model Ordinance Package to be used as a resource to jurisdictions in the
development of policies and regulations to meet interim GMA requirements
Produced a matrix identifying which jurisdictions currently regulate critical areas and resource lands
JRS
3
December 12.1991
Established subregions for achieving consistency in critical areas and resource lands protection, and
convened sessions to share technical information on each critical area/resource land defined by the
GMA.
1992 Objectives:
Produce a countywide map of major critical areas and resource lands (March, 1992)
Identify the relationship between critical areas, open space corridors and Urban Growth Areas (Aprii,
1992)
The Critical Areas Technical Forum will conclude its regular meetings in April, and will convene as
needed later in 1992.
Surface Water Work Group
1991 Accomplishments:
Identified data format and needs to support and coordinate with other Technical Forums and County-
wide Planning Policies
Discussed compatible approaches to developing mandatory elements of the capital facilities plans
Initiated inventory
1992 Objectives:
Produce guidelines for coordinated levels of service (January, 1992)
Develop surface water criteria for Countywide and municipal Urban Growth Area designation. Prepare
recommendations for service provision in annexation areas- (May, 1992)
Develop financing strategies and propose land use reassessment mechanisms for Incorporation into
capital facilities plans. (May, 1992)
Affordable Housing Technical Forum
This forum will be established in 1992 to identify regional needs for affordable housing, recommend
implementation measures for countywide planning policies, and provide technical assistance and
information in the preparation of each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan housing element
1992 Objectives:
Define and quantify countywide housing need, including housing for low and moderate households,
special needs, and first-time home buyers (February 1992)
Survey jurisdictions on existing housing units, existing and projected needs, and priorities for future
programs; produce a menu of strategies to deveiop and preserve affordable housing (Aprii 1992)
Evaiuate Urban Growth Area alternatives for impact on affordable housing (June 1992)
JRS
4
December 12, 1991
Evaluate and recommend Implementation mechanisms to be adopted at the local and regional levels
to achieve consistency w~h countywide affordable housing policies. (July 1992)
Develop mon~oring and evaluation measures to determine success In meeting housing needs and
countywide policies for distribution of affordable housing (October 1992)
Sewer Work Group
1991 Accomplishments:
Coordinated collection of update Information and available sewer comprehensive plans, CIPs, and
adopting ordinances from King County sewerage agencies
1992 Objectives: (Preliminary)
Organize facility inventory data (March 1992)
Assessment of sewer system and UGA impacts (August 1992)
Identification of long term sewer agency facility needs (September 1992)
Prepare need/cost/revenue analysis for financial capacity determination (October 1992)
Water Work Group
1991 Accomplishments:
Completed in~ial assessment of relationships between water supply. federal safe drinking water regu-
lations and land use
1992 Objectives:
. Publish draft Seattle Water Department comprehensive regional Water Supply Plan and DEIS, which
addresses water supply issues for the majority of existing and future urban areas, and covers a thirty
year planning period (April, 1992)
Finalize water supply demand forecasts and programs and projects needed to meet projected demand
for the thirty year planning period (July 1992)
3.
Public Involvement
The Countywide Planning Policies process includes a public participation contract that will be funded
and managed interjurisdlctionally. The public involvement element will include public meetings
throughout King County where comments and opinions on growth management will be elic~ed. A
report of the comments received will be prepared for the Growth Management Planning Council to
assist In ~s consideration of recommended policies.
Individual jurisdictions' work programs include public participation elements.
JRS
5
December 12.1991
4.
JRS
Assistance To Small Cities
Cities are encouraged to combine resources when appropriate or engage the services of neighboring
jurisdictions to complete work required by the Growth Management Act. In 1991, six cities contracted
with King County's Environmental Division to produce critical areas maps as required by the GMA. The
cities of Hunt's Point, Clyde Hill, Yarrow Point and Medina jointly contracted with consulting firms for
GMA work. Skykomish is receiving assistance from KJng County in preparing work plans and contract
management.
The small city perspective is particularly valuable in the deliberations of the Liaison Group, and Dan
Drentlaw, Enumclaw Planning Director, is a member of that group. The LJaison Group will identify
technical assistance resources that will be available to small cities upon request.
individual Jurisdiction work plans are to include plans for combining resources with other cities and/or
assisting neighboring small cities as appropriate.
6
December 12,1991
o'r .dopl<d
by Ju/)' 1;
ID citkIJ for """"""""
",drK.ÔOø ...., "'"
,.. Seattle & ..,
! Suburban ¡
\......~.~~.i.~...../
.\ tllIl'I\lltt, H
, " ..,. " ....
Growth Management County-wide Planning Policy
(CPP) Development"'Adoption~..& Ratification
T'ff'omnlf"flci-d
CI'1'byMq /5
"""""'"
/' City, """
f public !
\~.:.~/
.Review by City and County legislative authorities and Public
JC/BB 10/18/91
ATTACHMENT 2
Growth Management Act Grant, 1991-92 Allocations to King Count Jurisdictions
King County - countywide allocation $2,290,066 Base $35,000 NO:JC:JR
Amount reserved for countywide efforts ($332,000) Countywide dec19
Amount for distribution among jurisdictions $1,958,066 reduction 14.5%
=======================================================================================================
Jurisdiction 1991 Base Per Capi ta Total Grant $$ Diff 90 to 91
Population Percent in 90
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A l gona 1,757 D.11% $29,926 1,171 $31,097 $36,279 ($5,182)
Auburn 33,280 2.16% $29,926 22,172 52,098 60,389 (8,291)
Beaux Arts 287 0.02% $29,926 191 30,117 35,219 (5,102)
Bellevue 87,900 5.70% $29,926 58,562 88,488 101,085 (12,597)
Black Oiamond 1,505 0.10% $29,926 1,003 30,929 36,123 (5,194)
Bothell 12,630 0.82% $28,956 8,414 37.371 42,416 (5,045)
Carnation 1,265 0.08% $29,926 843 30,769 35,933 (5,164)
Clyde Hill 2,980 0.19% $29,926 1,985 31,911 37,297 (5,386)
Des Moines 17,480 1.13% $29,926 11,646 41,572 46,516 (4,944)
Duvall 3,D20 0.20% $29,926 2,012 31,938 36,810 (4,872)
Enl.l1lClaw 7,450 0.48% $29,926 4,963 34,889 39,751 (4,862)
Federal Way 70,660 4.58% $29,926 47,076 77,002 82,565 (5,563)
Hunts Point 505 D.D3% $29,926 336 30,262 35,375 (5,113)
Issaquah 7,860 0.51% $29,926 5,237 35,163 40,494 (5,331)
Kent 39,650 2.57:>: $29,926 26,416 56,342 62,835 (6,493)
King County 531,881 34.49% $29,926 354,355 384,281 417,750 <33,469)
Kirkland 40,590 2.63% $29,926 27,042 56,968 63,028 (6,060)
Lake Forest Par 4,030 0.26% $29,926 2,685 32,611 37,082 (4,471)
Hna 2,970 0.19% $29,926 1,979 31,905 37,201 (5,296)
Mercer Island 21,190 1.37:>: $29,926 14,117 44,043 50,337 (6,294)
Milton 695 0.05% $3,804 463 4,267 4,869 (602)
Normandy Park 6,730 0.44% $29,926 4,484 34,410 39,922 (5,512)
North Bend 2,590 0.17:>: $29,926 1,726 31,652 36,799 (5,147)
Pacific 4,690 0.30% $29,926 3,125 33,051 38,033 (4,982)
Redmond 37,460 2.43% $29,926 24,957 54,883 61,333 (6,450)
Renton 43,000 2.m $29,926 28,648 58,574 64,247 (5,673)
SeaTac 22,830 1. 48% $29,926 15,210 45,136 52,843 (7,707)
Seattle 518,000 33.59% $29,926 345,107 375,033 408,060 (33,027)
Skykomi sh 275 0.02% $29,926 183 30,109 35,181 (5,072)
Snoqualmie 1,545 0.10% $29,926 1,029 30,955 36,149 (5,194)
Tukwila 14,630 0.95% $29,926 9,747 39,673 43,044 (3,371)
Yarrow Point 965 0.06% $29,926 643 30,569 35,732 (5,163)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1,542,300 $930,540 $1,027,526 $1,958,066 $2,190,697 ($232,631)
-----_--___--n----_---_------_--____n__--_n_--_----_-___--__n_--------__n_--__--_----___n___n_--
------------------------------_____nn_-------_____n_--______n_-___n_------____--_nn__--__nnn-
Note: Bothell and Milton receive a proportionate share of the base
amount, based on the portion of population in King County.
A TT ACHMENT 3
KING COUNTY PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS/FINANCE LIAISON GROUP
Publ ic Works
Bill Guenzler, Bellevue 462-406l FAX 637-5272
Carol Osborne, Redmond (alternate) BB2-6460 FAX 882-9700
Ross Earnst, Tukwila 433-0179 FAX 431-3665
Lynn Guttman, Renton (alternate) 235-2569 FAX 235-25l3
Philip Keightley, Federal Way 661-4131 FAX 66l-4129
Frank Currie, Auburn (alternate) 93l-30l0 FAX 93l-3053
Gary Zarker. Seattle 684-5000 FAX 233-3887
Paul Tanaka, King County 296-6500 FAX 296-3749
Lou Haff (alternate) 296-6590 FAX 296-0655
Planning
Larry Springer, Federal Way 66l-4l02 FAX 66l-4129
Eric Shields, Des Moines (alternate) 878-8626 FAX 824-6975
Dan Drentlaw, Enumclaw 825-3591 FAX 825-7232
Sandra Davis, Mercer Island (alternate) 236-5300 FAX 236-3651
Roberta Lewandowski, Redmond 882-6447 FAX 869-0l48
Rob Odle, Bellevue (alternate) 455-6880 FAX 637-7l15
Gary Lawrence, Seattle 684-8056 FAX 684-5360
Elsie Crossman (alternate) 684-8056 FAX 684-5360
Lois Schwennesen, King County 296-7503 FAX 296-B686
Miriam Greenbaum (alternate) 296-B658 FAX 296-01l9
Finance
Dan Clement, Renton 235-2558 FAX 235-2513
Pat Dugan, Auburn (alternate) 931-3033 FAX 931-3053
Joanne Sylvis, Mercer Island 236-3555 FAX 236-3651
Lenda Crawford, Redmond (alternate) 882-6424 FAX 867-7657
METRO
Ron Posthuma 684-1007 FAX 684-l677
C
°A