Loading...
Res 95-205C� • RESOLUTION NO. 95-205 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, OPPOSING THE SHIPMENT OF SPENT NUCLEAR MATERIALS THROUGH THE PORT OF TACOMA WHEREAS, the Port of Tacoma is one of ten possible ports of entry listed in a Department of Energy March 1995 draft Environmental Impact Statement to receive spent nuclear fuel shipments and that such shipments would be trucked to nuclear fuel sites around the country; and WHEREAS, the draft Environmental Impact Statement is inadequate in several respects, including that it fails to adequately address security issues at the port and in transit, it fails to adequately identify emergency response in the event of a catastrophic mishap and it fails to adequately address the socio- economic impacts associated with the stigma of being within the proximity of a port of entry of spent nuclear wastes, WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way is a major municipality of 73,500 persons located only one mile from the Port of Tacoma; and WHEREAS, the stigma and inherent risk of having the Port of Tacoma as a port of entry for the shipment of spelzt nuclear �- materials would throw a pall over the entire area around the por�t, including Federal Way; NOW, THEREFORE, - Res . � 95-205 Page#� ORIGlNAL . • , THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Statement of Opbosition. The Federal Way City Council strongly opposes the shipment of spent nuclear materials through the Port of Tacoma and encourages the Department of Energy to choose a more suitable site to receive these shipments. Section 2. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect tMe validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 4. Effective Date This resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage by the Federal Way City Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, this (p �" day of ��� , 1995 . CITY OF FEDERAL WAY � _ MAYO , Y E. GATES ATTEST: �, � T LERK, N. C ISTINE GREEN, CMC Res . #_95-205, Page#_� 0 � � APPROVED AS TO FORM: IT A , . LIN FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: Hay 30, 1995 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: June 6, 1995 RE50LUTION NO. 95-205 K:\RESO\NUCLEAR.JJM 6-6-95 • � .._ Res . # qs_�n� Page#_� • CITY OF � - e - �� �� � 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH � (20fi) 661-4000 FEDERAl. WAY, WA 98Q03-6210 May 26, 1995 Mr. Chazles Head Office of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management (EM-37) U. S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D. C. 20585 • � Dear Mr. Head: Thank you for the opporlunity to comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) oa the proposed Nuclear Weapons Proliferation Policy Conceming Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel. The City of Federal Way is a municipality of 73,500 persons north of and adjacent to the City of Tacoma. Our municipal boundary is only one mile from the Port of Tacoma. Our review of the DEIS leads us to the conclusion that the review is inadequate in several respects: 1. The DEIS fails to adequately addresses security issues at the port and in transit. What measures aze provided to adequately secure the spent fuels from a hostile attempt to steal or pirate the casks while in transit on ship, rail or truck? 2. The DEIS fails to adequately identify emergency response in the event of a catastrophic mishap. What agency and resources would respond? What is the plan of action? Who is responsible for training? 3. The DEIS fails to adequately address the socio-economic factors that would be associate�i with the stigma of being a port for the transport of spent nuclear fuel. What costs would there be associate� with lack of future business to the Port of Tacoma and the City of Tacoma by those choosing to do business elsewhere because of this issue? Without a complete and detailed analysis addressing these issues it would appear that the DEIS is inadequate. You can contact me at (206) 661-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, � Gregory . M e, AICP Director of Community Development Services c: Federal Way Ciry Council United States Representative Randy Tate United States Senator Patty Murray United States Senator Slade Gorton State Representative Ray Schow State Representative Tim Hickel State Representative Maryann Mitchell Patrick O'Malley, President, Port of Tacoma, and Commissioners Harold G. Moss, Mayor, City of Tacoma, and Council , �- • MEETING DATE: June 6, 1995 I'rEM# CITY OF FEDERAL WAY City Council AGENDA ITEM ►,S�J�.T: Shipment of Spent Nuclear Fuels Through Port of Tacama CATEGORY: BUDGET IlVIPACT: � CONSENT RRRESOLUTION Amount Budgeted: $ �ORDINANCE STAFF REPORT Expenditure Amt: $ �( BUSINESS PROCLAMATION Contingency Reqd: $ HEARING STUDY SFSSION FYI OTHER �ATTAC�IlVIENTS: Resolution opposing the slupment of spent nuclear materials through the Pod of Tacoma. May 26 1995 staff comment letter on Draft Environmental Impact Statement. r SUMIVIARYBACKGROiJND: The Port of Tacoma is one of ten possible ports of entry listed in a draft Environmental Lnpact Statement to receive spent nuclear fuel shipments that would then be trucked to storage sites around the country. The Port. of Tacoma and the City of Tacoma are opposed, based on security, safety, image and socio-economic issues. Staff attended a May 22, 1995 Fact F'inding/Public Comment meeting. Public hearings by DOE are scheduled for May 2A and Jw►e 19, 1995. Staff prepared and sent a comments letter (dated May 26, 1995� on the Draft Environmental Lnpact Statement. Attached is a Resolution opposing the shipment of spent nudear materials through the Port of Tacoma. CITY COUNCIL COMMIITEE RECOMMENDATION: N/A CTTY MANAGER APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN COUNCIL PACKET: � (BELOW TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) CO CIL ACTION: APPROVED ��C°` ��— UNCIL BILL A� DE1vIID TABLED/DEFERRED/NO ACTION CO ORDINANCE � RESOLUTION # gs =a 0�S �an.�si3avs