Loading...
Res 94-192 RESOLUTION NO. 94-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES. WHEREAS, the City Council previously authorized the entry into an Interlocal Agreement with King County for the purposes of providing law enforcement services to the City; and WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement") was amended by subsequent City council actions authorizing such amendments; and WHEREAS, in connection with the provisions of the Agreement as amended, and particularly in connection with the costs and charges for law enforcement services, termination provisions and negotiations provisions for a long-term agreement, it is appropriate to amend the Agreement in accordance with an agreement in principal reached between the City and King County, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: section 1. Amendment. That the amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with King County for law enforcement services, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as "Exhibit A" and incorporated herein by this reference, be, and the same hereby is, approved, and that the City Manager is authorized to execute the same on behalf of the city. Res. #94-192, Page#---1- COpy Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of the resolution is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective i~ediately upon passage by the Federal Way city Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY CO~CIL OF THE CITY OF FEDE~L WAY, WASHINGTON, this 6TH day of December , 1994. CITY OF FEDE~L WAY APPROVED AS TO FO~: FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 11/29/94. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 12/06~94 RESOLUTION NO. 9&-192 K: \RESO\POL I CE .[95 11/29/94 Res.#96-192, Page~ Z Amendment to Interlocal Agreement City of Federal Way and King County, Washington Relating to Law Enforcement Services WHEREAS, King County (hereafter County) and the City of Federal Way (hereafter City), have an agreement whereby the County, for an agreed upon price, provides law enforcement services to the City of Federal Way, and WHEREAS, that document provides, in Section 13, that the agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement, and WHEREAS, the County and the City have mutually agreed to a change in the compensation method and other provisions for such law enforcement services for the period of said amendment only, and WHEREAS, the County and the City wish to amend the existing interlocal agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, it is mutually agreed by and between the County and the City that the Interlocal Agreement relating to Law Enforcement Services is hereby amended as follows: The following new sections are added to the existing Law Enforcement Agreement and to the extent that the prior agreement is in conflict with this amendment, this amendment shall prevail: 16. Period of Amendment 16.1 This amendment covers the period from January 1, 1995 through October 15, 1996 only, unless or until it is superseded by a new interlocal agreement approved by the parties. 16.2 The parties hereby agree to negotiate with the intention of reaching agreement on a new interlocal agreement by April 15, 1995. If a new agreement is reached, it shall take effect on January 1, 1996, or upon another mutually agreed upon date. 16.3 In the event a new agreement has not been approved by the parties, the parties hereby agree that the interlocal agreement in effect prior to the execution of this amendment shall govern pricing of services provided pursuant to the agreement for the period from October 16, 1996 and beyond. 17. 1995 and 1996 Contract Charges: 17.1 For the period of this amendment, the County will provide to the City law enforcement services as described in the existing Interlocal Agreement at the level of service provided in 1994 for the price listed on Attachment" A" to this amendment. Amendment to Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement City of Federal Way 17.2 For the period of this amendment, Pa~rol Officer Units and non-patrol services, all as defined in the existing Interlocal Agree~ent as amended, may be added or deleted at the City's discretion at the 1994 estimated cost. The City hereby agrees to notify the County of any adjustments to the 1994 Patrol Officer Unit and non-patrol service levels immediately following any legislative action by the City to change said service levels, and by October I, 1995 for 1996 Unit and service level changes, if any. 17.3 No year end cost adjustment will be made for 1994 and for the period of this amendment. No annual update will be made for the period of this amendment. 18. Termination Process. For the period of this amendment, the following tennination process will apply: 18.1 The party desiring to terminate this agreement shall provide written notice to the other party. Such written notice shall not be provided prior to April 15, 1995. 18.2 Upon receipt of such notice, the parties agree to commence work on and complete a transition plan providing for an orderly transition of responsibilities from the County to the City over a minimum time frame of six (6) months for the transition planning and twelve (12) months for the implementation of the plan, for a total of eighteen (18) months. The transition plan shall identify personnel, capital equipment, workload and any other issues related to the transition. Each party shall bear its respective costs in developing the transition plan. This time period may be extended by mutual agreement. 19. Negotiations for Long Term Contract 19.1 The parties shall jointly develop a work program and schedule for development of a new interlocal agreement to take effect on January 1. 1996 or upon another mutually agreed upon date. An initial draft of the work program and schedule will be targeted for completion by December 15, 1994, which date can be extended by agreement of the parties. 19.2 The goal of the work program will be to develop a model that is consistent with the fundamental principles set forth in Attachment "Bn to this amendment. The work program shall consist of the tasks needed to be completed in order to develop the new contract model and prepare a new interlocal agreement by a target date of April 15, 1995, provided, however, that the target date may be extended for one 30-day extension period by mutual agreement of the parties if there is reason to believe that such extension would result in completion of the contract with tenDS agreeable to the parties. 2 Amendment to Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement City of Federal Way ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS of the Interlocal Agreement relating to Law Enforcement Services as amended remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this amendment to the Agreement to be executed. King County City of Federal Way King County Executive City Manager Date Date Approved as to Form Approved as to Form King County Prosecuting Attorney City Attorney Date Date KC OFM November 17, 1994 o:\regionallFederai Way\9Spolamd 3 Atlacluu""t "A" I KING COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT, _NDMENT 1995 AND 1996 COST FOR SERViCE BY CITY 11110/94 leoalraél Caleulatloa by City Beaux Federal Newport North Sky- Woodin- Arts Burica Way lillls' Bend SeaTae komisb ville TOTAL 285 27,612 75,320 7,751 2,620 22,840 250 9,407 146,085 ewpon Hills") 138,334 f2 0.21% 19.96% 54.45% 0% 1.89% 16.51% 0-18% 6.80% 100,00% ; $515 $49,901 $136,120 $0 $4,735 $41,277 $452 $17,001 $250,000 Amount $17,690 $3,746,014 $8,096,598 $343,344 $405,818 $3,324,587 $14,568 $702,378 $16,650,997 IJ'Ort) luction ($515) ($49,901) ($136,120) $0 ($4,735) ($41,277) ($452) ($17,001) ($250,000) $17,175 $3,696,113 $7,960,478 $343,344 $401,083 $3,283,310 $14,116 $685,377 $16,400,997 AMOUNT $0 $233,264 $127,902 $0 ($71,119) $483,617 $0 $66,542 $840,206 aYille one-time exPlnses, as per ¡antrac' ¡+ I $17,175 I $3,929,377 $8,088,380 $343,344 $329,964 $3,766,927 $14,116 $751,919 $17,241,203 SUPPLEMENTAL ~996 BASE COST PER MONTH $1,431 $308,009 S663,373 S28,612 S33,424 S273,609 SI,176 S57,I15 SI,366,750 1996 BASE, JAN - OCT 15 SI3,597 S2,926,089 S6,302,O45 S271,814 S317,524' S2,599,287 SI1,175 S542,591 SI2,984,123 WITH SUPPLEMENTALS: 1996 COST PER MONTH SI,431 S327,448 S674,032 S28,612 S27,497 S313,911 SI,176 S62,660 SI,436,767 1996 COST JAN-oCT 15 $13,597 S3,110,757 S6,403,301 S271,814 $261,222 S2,982,151 SI1,175 S595,270 S13,649,286 " Newport Hills price will be al annualized 1994 level with no portion of the additional reduction, as per agreement between the parties. Attachment "B" November 15, 1994 Police Contracts 1996 Model Development Goal: Cities and County will work cooperatively to create a new model structure for pricing and delivery of contract police services. Fundamental Principles for Development of 1996-1997 Model Proposed by Cities County Response 1. Greater city participation in detennining Contracting cities will determine services and services and staffmg levels staffing levels with the advice of the Sheriff. 2. Individual cities should have a greater role Operational modifications to be implemented in directing activities of patrol officers will include: assigned to them . County patrol services would function as city police forces and would foHow standard protocols for answering calls for assistance in outside jurisdictions. . Maintain stricter adherence to FTE levels budgeted for contract cities 3. Greater city budget control and Model will provide for greater city and county predictability budget control and predictability. 4. County provide independent analysis of Model will reflect the results of an independent incremental costs to assure that cities do not analysis that identifies costs, funding and bear the costs of regional services or general beneficiaries of services, support and overhead. government Goals of the independent analysis will be to ensure that: . Contract cities do not bear a disproportionate share of overhead or countywide police costs. . Residents of unincorporated areas or non" contract cities do not subsidize the cost of contract city police services 5. Bottoms up, menu model One ot more models will be adopted. At least one model will give cities the ability to chose from a menu of services and pay for services by building billable costs. from the lowest staffing or service unit. (bottoms up, menu structure) , . Attachment "B" November 15, 1994 6. More detailed accounting of costs and More detailed accounting of costs and services services should be delivered as a regular will be delivered to contracting cities as a reporting function regular reporting function 7. Basis for allocating costs should depend Basis for allocating costs could depend on the on the service service 8. Administration, personnel, training, Administration, personnel, training, major fingerprinting, records, etc. should be pooled crimes investigation, fingerprinting, records, and distributed on equitable basis. etc., would be pooled and distributed on equitable basis. 9. Stronger local identification of officers Patrol officers may be identified as local city police officers 10. Model with: Models could include: . "Tri-City" staffing structure proposed by . "Tri-City" staffing structure proposed by Burien, SeaTac and Federal Way, which Burien, SeaTac and Federal Way! which would put control of patrol resources at would put control of patrol resources at city level and shàred resources at county city level and shared resources at county level. level . Models with base, "variable and optional . Model with base, variable and optional services services . Cost Centers costing model proposed by King County . Some combination of those structures and cost approaches . Modifications of existing Dispatched Calls for Service model . Other models not yet identified ')